UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

 
FORM 10-K
 

(MARK ONE)
xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended March 31, 201230, 2013
 OR
oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the transition period from ___________ to _____________
 
Commission file number: 1-12696
 
Plantronics, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 
Delaware 77-0207692
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
   
345 Encinal Street, Santa Cruz, California 95060
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
 
(831) 426-5858
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
 
Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
   
COMMON STOCK, $.01 PAR VALUENEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE
PREFERRED SHARE PURCHASE RIGHTS NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
NONE
(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  
Yes S No £

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.   
Yes £ No S



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes S No £
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes S No £

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K  is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. £
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one).
Large Accelerated Filer S
Accelerated Filer £
  
Non-accelerated Filer £ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller Reporting Company £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  Yes £ No S
 
The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, based upon the closing price of $28.45$35.33 for shares of the Registrant's common stock on September 30, 2011,29, 2012, the last trading day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter as reported by the New York Stock Exchange, was approximately $1,240,169,114.$1,492,167,700.  In calculating such aggregate market value, shares of common stock owned of record or beneficially by officers, directors, and persons known to the Registrant to own more than five percent of the Registrant's voting securities as of September 30, 201129, 2012 (other than such persons of whom the Registrant became aware only through the filing of a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission) were excluded because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates.  This determination of affiliate status is for purposes of this calculation only and is not conclusive.
 
As of April 28, 2012, 42,509,50527, 2013, 43,286,166 shares of common stock were outstanding.
 
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant's Proxy Statement for its 20122013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on or about August 10, 20121, 2013 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

 





Plantronics, Inc.
FORM 10-K
For the Year Ended March 31, 20122013

TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
Part I.  Page
Item 1. 
Item 1A. 
Item 1B. 
Item 2. 
Item 3. 
Item 4. 
Part II.   
Item 5. 
Item 6. 
Item 7. 
Item 7A. 
Item 8. 
Item 9. 
Item 9A. 
Item 9B. 
Part III.   
Item 10. 
Item 11. 
Item 12. 
Item 13. 
Item 14. 
Part IV.   
Item 15. 
 
Plantronics®, Clarity®, BackBeat® GO, and Simply Smarter Communications™Communications® are trademarks or registered trademarks of Plantronics, Inc.

DECT™ is a trademark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its members in France and other jurisdictions.

The Bluetooth name and the Bluetooth® trademarks are owned by Bluetooth SIG, Inc. and are used by Plantronics, Inc. under license.

All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.



Table of Contents

PART I
 
This Form 10-K is filed with respect to our fiscal year 2012.2013. Each of our fiscal years ends on the Saturday closest to the last day of March. Fiscal year 2013 ended on March 30, 2013, fiscal year 2012 ended on March 31, 2012, and fiscal year 2011 ended on April 2, 2011, and fiscal year 2010 ended on April 3, 2010.  Fiscal years 2013, 2012, and 2011 each consisted of 52 weeks and fiscal year 2010 consisted of 53 weeks.  For purposes of consistent presentation, we have indicated in this report that each fiscal year ended "March 31" of the given year, even though the actual fiscal year end may have been on a different date.

CERTAIN FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
 
This Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).  These statements may generally be identified by the use of such words as "expect," "anticipate," "believe," "intend," "potential""potential," or "will," or variations of such words and similar expressions are based on current expectations and entail various risks and uncertainties.  Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the factors discussed in the subsection entitled "Risk Factors" in Item 1A of this Form 10-K.  This Form 10-K should be read in conjunction with these risk factors.  We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

ITEM 1.  BUSINESS
COMPANY BACKGROUND
 
Plantronics, Inc. (“Plantronics,” “Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us”) is a leading global designer, manufacturer, and marketer of lightweight communications headsets, telephone headset systems, and accessories for the worldwide business and consumer markets under the Plantronics brand.  In addition, we manufacture and market specialty products under our ClarityClarity® brand, specialty products, such as telephones for the hearing impaired, and other related products for people with special communication needs.

Prior to December 1, 2009, we operated as two segments, the Audio Communications Group (“ACG”) and the Audio Entertainment Group ("AEG"). We completed the sale of Altec Lansing, which comprisedoperate our AEG segment, effective December 1, 2009; therefore, it is no longer included in continuing operations, and we operatebusiness as one segment.  We have classified the AEG operating results, including the loss on sale of AEG, as discontinued operations in the Consolidated statement of operations for all periods presented.

Our headsets are communications tools providing freedoma hands-free connection to use your hands while staying connected to your communication or entertainment device,devices, while also allowing freedom to move around and freedom from using keyboards by enhancing speech recognition capabilities.of movement for our users.  We use a variety of technologies to develop high quality products that meet the needs of our customers, whether for communications or personal entertainment.  Our headsets are widely used with mobile phones,for applications such as Unified Communications (“UC”), in contact centers, in the office and in the home, for applications such as Unified Communications (“UC”), with mobile phones and Internet telephony, for gaming, and for other specialty applications.  Our major product categories include Office and Contact Center (“OCC”), which includes corded and cordless communication headsets, audio processors, and telephone systems; Mobile, which includes Bluetooth® and corded products for mobile phone applications; Gaming and Computer Audio, which includes personal computer ("PC") and gaming headsets; and Clarity, which includes specialty products marketed for hearing impaired individuals.  The majority of ourOur products are sold under the Plantronics and Clarity brands.

We ship our products to approximately 7060 countries through a worldwide network of distributors, retailers, wireless carriers, original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”), and telephony service providers.  We have well-developed distribution channels in North America, Europe, and in some parts of the Asia Pacific region, particularly in China, Australia, Japan, and New Zealand, where use of our products is widespread.  Our distribution channels in other geographic regions are less mature, and while we primarily serve the contact center markets in those regions, we continue to expand into the office, mobile, gaming and computer audio, and specialty telephone markets in those regions and additionalother international locations.  Revenues from our retail channel are typically seasonal, with ourthe December quarter (our third fiscal quarterquarter) typically being the strongest quarter due to holiday seasonality.strongest.

Plantronics was founded and incorporated in 1961 and initially became a public company in 1977. Plantronics is incorporated in the State of Delaware and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the ticker symbol "PLT".
 
Our principal executive offices are located at 345 Encinal Street, Santa Cruz, California, 95060.  Our telephone number is (831) 426-5858.  Our Company website is www.plantronics.com.  


1

Table of Contents

In the Investor Relations section of our website, we provide access free of charge, directly or through a link on our website, as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, to the following filings: our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In addition, documents regarding our corporate governance and the charters of the standing committeecommittees of our Board of Directors are also accessible in the Investor Relations section of our website.

1

Table of Contents

MARKET INFORMATION
 
General Industry Background
 
Plantronics operates predominantly in the electronics industry and focuses on the design, manufacture, and distribution of headsets for business and consumer applications, and other specialty products for the hearing impaired.  We develop enhanced communication products for offices and contact centers, mobile and cordless phones, and computers and gaming consoles.  We offer our products under two brands – Plantronics and Clarity.

The proliferation of desktop computing makescommunications devices and the corresponding ubiquity of voice communications across many venues of people's daily lives make communications headsets a key product in many occupations because they permit users to be more efficient in an ergonomically comfortable environment by allowing them to verbally communicate without holding traditional handset devices, as well as to participate in webinars, conference calls,driver of efficiency, ergonomic comfort, and other audio communication sessions on a hands-free basis without disturbing colleagues who may be sitting nearby.safety for our users.  Growing awareness of driver safety and impending or existing hands-free legislation mandating hands-free devices for telephonic communications while driving has led to increased headset adoption for mobile phone users.  The increased adoption of new and existing technologies, such as UC, Bluetooth, Voice over Internet Protocol ("VoIP"), Digital Signal Processing ("DSP"), and Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications (“DECT”DECT™”), each of which is described below, has contributed to increased demand for our headsets and audio solutions:

UC is the integration of voice, data, and video-based communications systems enhanced with software applications and IP networks.  It may include the integration of devices and media associated with a variety of business workflows and applications, including e-mail, instant messaging, presence, audio, video and web conferencing, and unified messaging.  UC seeks to provide seamless connectivity and user experience for enterprise workers regardless of their location and environment, improving the overall business efficiency and providing more effective collaboration among an increasingly distributed workforce.  

Bluetooth wireless technology is a short-range communications technology intended to replace the cables connecting portable and/or fixed devices while maintaining high levels of security.  The key features of Bluetooth technology are robustness,ubiquitousness, low power, and low cost.  The Bluetooth specification defines a uniform structure for a wide range of devices to connect and communicate with each other.  Bluetooth technology has achieved global acceptance such that any Bluetooth enabled device, almost anywhere in the world, can connect to other Bluetooth enabled devices in proximity.

VoIP is a technology that allows a person to communicate using a broadband Internet connection instead of a regular (or analog) telephone line.  VoIP converts the voice signal into a digital signal that travels over the Internet or other packet-switched networks and then converts it back at the other end so that the caller can speak to anyone with another VoIP connection or a regular (or analog) phone line.

DSP is a technology that delivers acoustic protection and optimal sound quality through noise reduction, echo cancellation, and other algorithms to improve both transmit and receive quality.

DECT is a wireless communications technology that optimizes audio quality, lowers interference with other wireless devices, and is digitally encrypted for heightened call security.

The demand for headsets has generally grown over time for both business and consumer applications.  The trend towards wireless products has been a significant factor in each of these markets but may be less so in the future, as we believe the pace of change from wired to wireless will likely decrease as the market continues to mature.  Our business is sensitive to economic cycles, and we experienced a decrease in demand in fiscal years 2009 andyear 2010 due to the global economic recession.  WeIn the second half of our fiscal year 2010, we began to experience a recovery in revenues, starting in the second half of fiscal year 2010 which has continued over the last twothree fiscal years; however, there can be no assurance that revenues will not decline in the future.




2

Table of Contents

Solutions
 
UC solutions continue to represent our primary focus area. EnterprisesOur portfolio of solutions, which combines hardware with ground-breaking sensor technology and consumers alike are experiencing rapidly evolving communications needs, transforming the requirement for a traditional headset used only for voice communications into a device providing contextual intelligence. Contextual intelligencesoftware functionality, provides the ability to reach people using the mode of communication that is most effective, on the device that is most convenient, and with control over when and how they can be reached. Our portfolio of solutions, which combines hardware with ground-breaking sensor technology, achieves contextual intelligence designed to address the needs of constantly changing business environments and evolving work styles, making connecting easier and sharing information about user availability. For example, the advanced sensor technology in our UC solutions can detect a user's presence, including proximity to the user's PC and whether the headset is being worn, and can share this information with others to make them aware of the user's presence and availability. Using this same technology, our solutions can automatically pause audio applications during an incoming call, change the default audio selection to the user's headset, and then answer the call; all of this is achieved without manual intervention. Finally, our solutions allow users to seamlessly transition calls seamlessly between PCs, smartphones, tablets, and desk phones, without interruption in the conversation or loss in audio quality. We believe UC systems will become more commonly adopted by enterprises to reduce costs and improve collaboration, and we believe our solutions will be an important part of the UC environment through the offering of contextual intelligence.

As a commitment to our investment in UC solutions, we announced in the first quarter of fiscal year 2013 the Plantronics Developer Connection ("PDC"), which includes programming interfaces, technical resources, and forums through a software development kit.discussion forums.  The PDC serves as a community for software developers to connect with our technical staff and comes witheach other, and includes an emulator that allows application testingcontext-rich applications to be rapidly developed even without a physical headset.  We believe the PDC will continue to bringhelp developers to add contextual intelligence to existing applications. PDC partners have already developed applications ultimately providing an endless array of capabilities such as user authentication, customerthat use incoming caller id and contextual information retrieval based on incoming mobile calls,derived from sensors, and connection of a user's physical actions in the real world to the virtual world.have combined contextual information with analytics.

Our products enhance communications by providing the following benefits:

sensorSensor technology that allows calls to be answered automatically when the user attaches the headset, transfers callsswitches the audio from the headset to the mobile phone when the user removes the headset and, with some softphone applications, updates the user's presence;presence

enabling smarterSmarter working capability through seamless communications and high quality audio across a mobile device, desk phone, and PC, thereby allowing users to workcommunicate more flexibly anywhere, anytime,from a wide array of physical locations and be more productive without the need to be physically present in an office;when away from a traditional office environment
 
providing aA convenient means for connecting between various applications and voice networks, whether between land line and mobile phones, or between PC-based communications and other networks;networks

betterBetter sound quality that provides clearer conversations on both ends of a call through a variety of features and technologies, including noise-canceling microphones, Digital Signal Processing (“DSP”), and more;more

wirelessWireless freedom allowing people to take and make calls as they move freely without cords or cables around their office or home, or easily from public to private space when privacy is required;required

multi-taskingMulti-tasking benefits that allow people to use computers and mobile devices, including smartphones or other devices, while talking hands free;free

enabling emerging UC integration forof telephony, mobile cloudtechnologies, cloud-based communications, and PC across varied applications, and providing greater privacy than traditional speakerphones;

contributing to greater driving safety and enabling a motor vehicle operator to complyCompliance with hands-free legislation and enhanced roadway safety by havingallowing users to have both hands free to drive while talking on a mobile phone;phone

voiceVoice command and control that allow people to take advantage of voice dialing and/or other voice-based features to make communications and the human/electronic interface more natural and convenient;convenient

providing ergonomicErgonomic relief from repetitive stress injuries and discomfort associated with placing a telephone handset between the shoulder and neck; andneck

providing greaterGreater comfort and convenience than aon longer-duration telephone alone on longer duration calls.calls



3

Table of Contents

Markets and Product Categories

Our products are designed to meet the needs of specific markets and applications, such as offices (ranging from enterprise to home offices), contact centers, mobile devices (such as mobile phones and smartphones), computer and gaming, residential, and other specialty applications.  These markets and applications are increasingly overlapping as work styles and lifestyles change, and people use devices for multiple applications such as communication, music, and video entertainment.  We serve these markets through our product categories listed below.
 
Office and Contact Center ("OCC")
 
The office market comprises our largest revenue stream and we believe it also represents our largest revenue and profit growth opportunity. We offer a broad range of communications headsets, including high-end, ergonomically designed headsets, audio processors, and telephone systems.  Our end-users consist of enterprise employees as well asand small office, home office, and remote workers.  Growth in this market comes from the following three main factors:

increasingIncreasing deployment of UC systems;solutions
employee turnover; andEmployee turnover
growingGrowing awareness of the benefits of using headsets, including the benefits of wireless solutions.solutions

The contact center market is our most mature market, and we expect this market to grow slowly over the long-term.  We expect that contact centers will also adopt UC to help improve productivity and reduce costs.  We develop audio endpoints tailored specifically to UC, and as UC adoption continues to increase, we will continue to lead in new product performance by creating solutions that combine hardware and software for an improved customer solutions.experience.
 
Mobile
 
We believe thatthe Mobile headset market will continue to grow as individuals use the technology for both communications and entertainment. The use of headsets with mobile phones has grown worldwide. Mobile represents a large unithigh volume market and is our second largest revenue stream.  Use of headsets with mobile phones has grown due to factors such as continued Bluetooth technology adoption and hands-free legislation regarding the use of mobile phones while driving.  AsIn addition to the use of mono headsets become more widelytypically used users are becoming more fashion consciouswith mobile phones, the use of stereo Bluetooth technology has increased as well as individuals want to remain wireless without compromising on stereo sound quality. Our mono and stereo Bluetooth mobile headsets merge technological innovations with style, because we believe that style has become as important as functionality and technology.  Our mobile headsets merge technological innovations with style.  Growthtechnology in shaping consumers' purchasing decisions in the wearable technology space.  While growth in the mobile headset market has slowed in the United States ("U.S."), and continues to mature, we believe this market is likely to grow more slowly in the future than it has in the past as it continues to mature.growth will be driven primarily by demand for stereo Bluetooth technology.
 
Gaming and Computer Audio
Gaming and computer audio headsets, whether they are used for interactive on-line or console gaming, or switching between music and phone calls for multi-functional devices, represent an emerging market opportunity for us. We believe that a number of fundamental factors are likely to increase our customers’customers' needs for PC-compatible headsets in the future, including the convergence of telephony and entertainment, Internet multimedia applications such as streaming audio and video, increasing use of softphones, gaming, and video conferencing.  As devices providing these users’users' needs converge, our headsets need to be compatible with PCs, mobile phones, MP3 players, and various combinations of these.  We believe our product development roadmaps address the convergence brought about by these needs and we are currently increasing our investment in this area to enable future growth.

Specialty Products
 
Our specialty products sold under ourthe Clarity brand consist of products such as speakerphones, amplified captioned phones, amplified corded phones, personal listeners, and alarm clocks and are designed to address the unique needs of various consumer groups, one of which is the increasing number of people worldwide suffering from hearing loss.  We offer a comprehensive range of communications products that serves customers with mild, moderate, and severe hearing loss, as well as the deaf community.



4

Table of Contents

FOREIGN OPERATIONS
 
In fiscal years 20122013, 20112012 and 20102011, net revenues outside the U.S. accounted for approximately 43%, 41%43%, and 38%41%, respectively, of our total net revenues.  Revenues derived from foreign sales are generally subject to additional risks, such as fluctuations in exchange rates, increased tariffs, the imposition of other trade barriers, and potential currency restrictions.  In fiscal year 2012,2013, we continued to engage in hedging activities to limit our transaction and economic exposures, and to mitigate our exchange rate risks.  We hedgemanage our economic exposure by hedging a portion of our anticipated Euro and Great Britain Pound denominated sales and our Mexican Peso denominated expenditures, which together constitute the most significant portion of our currency exposure.  In addition, we hedgemanage our balance sheet exposure by hedging Euro, Great Britain Pound, and Australian Dollar denominated cash, balances, accounts receivable, and accounts payable. There have been fluctuations in the value of thepayable balances. Excess foreign currencies not required for local operations are converted into U.S. Dollar relative to the Euro and Great Britain Pound.Dollars. While our existing hedges cover a certain amount of exposure for fiscal year 20132014, any long-term weakening of the Euro and Great Britain Pound relative to the U.S. Dollar may have a material adverse impact on our financial results. See further discussion on our business risks associated with foreign operations under the risk titled, "We are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, which may adversely affect our revenues, gross profit, and profitability" within Item 1A Risk Factors in this Form 10-K.

Further information regarding our foreign operations, as required by Item 101(d) of Regulation S-K, can be found in Note 19, 18Geographical, Geographic Information, of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-K.
 
COMPETITION
 
The market for our products is very competitive and some of our competitors have greater financial resources than we do,us, as well as production, marketing, engineering and other capabilities to develop, manufacture, market, and sell their products.
 
One of our primary competitors is GN Netcom, a subsidiary of GN Store Nord A/S., a Danish telecommunications conglomerate that competes with us in the office, contact center, and mobile markets and, on a limited scale, in the gaming and computer audio market.  In addition, Aliph, Motorola, Logitech, Blue Ant Wireless, Samsung, LG, and Turtle BeachBose are significant competitors in the consumer mono Bluetoothheadset market, andmarket. Sennheiser Communications is a competitorand Logitech are competitors in the computer, office, and contact center markets.  There may also be increased competition frommarkets, while Beats and LG are competitors in the major mobile phoneBluetooth Stereo headset market.  In addition, Turtle Beach, Skullcandy, and accessory device makers such as Motorola, LG Electronics, and Samsung.Razer are competitors in the gaming market.

We believe the principal factors to be successful and competitive in each of the markets we serve are:are as follows:
 
ourOur understanding of emerging trends and new communication technologies, such as UC, and our ability to react quickly to the opportunities they provide;provide
ourAlliances and integration/compatibility with major UC vendors
Our ability to bring products to market that deliver on performance, product design, style, comfort, features, sound quality, simplicity, price, and reliability;reliability
maintenanceMaintenance of our brand name recognition and reputation;reputation
superiorSuperior customer service, support, and warranty terms; andterms
effectiveEffective and efficient distribution channels that allow us to market and sell our products.solutions
Increasing global reach

We believe that our products and our strategy enable us to compete based on these factors.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
 
We believe the future success of our business depends upon our ability to enhance our existing products, to develop compelling new and cost-effective products, to develop cost effective products, to have our products qualified by our technology partners and customers, to successfully introduce these products to existing and new markets on a timely basis, and to commence and sustain volume production to meet customer demands.

During fiscal year 20122013, we developed and introduced innovative products that enabled us to better address changing customer demands and emerging market trends.  Our goal is to bring the right products to market at the right time and have best in classbest-in-class development processes.
 

5

Table of Contents

Our core research and development focus in fiscal year 20132014 continueswill continue to be on UC, which will require incremental investments in firmware and software engineering to enhance the broad compatibility of our products inwith the enterprise systems withinto which they will be deployed and to develop value-added software applicationapplications for business users.  The products we are developing require significant technological knowledge and maymight be protected by intellectual property.property rights. Separately or together, this technological knowledge and our intellectual property may increase the barriers to entry for manygives us a competitive advantage over competitors. We are continually striving to improve the efficiency of our development processes through, among other things, strategic architecting, common platforms, and increased use of software and test tools.

5

Table of Contents


The success of new product introductions is dependent on a number of factors, including appropriate new product selection, timely completion and introduction to the market, cost-effective manufacturing, quality, acceptance of new technologies, and general market acceptance.  See further discussion onregarding our business risks associated with our manufacturers under the risk titled, "Our business will be materially adversely affected if we are unable to develop, manufacture, and market new products in response to changing customer requirements and new technologies" within Item 1A Risk Factors in this Form 10-K.

During fiscal years 20122013, 20112012 and 20102011, we incurred approximately $69.780.4 million, $63.269.7 million, and $57.863.2 million, respectively, in research, development and engineering expenses.  Historically, we have conducted most of our research, development and engineering with an in-house staff withand the limited use of contractors.  Key locations for our research, development and engineering staff are our facilities in the U.S., Mexico, China, and the United Kingdom.  

SALES AND DISTRIBUTION
 
We maintain a worldwide direct sales force to provide ongoing customer support and service globally.  WeTo support our customers' needs, we have a well-established, multi-level distribution network in North America, Europe, China, Australia, Japan, and New Zealand, where use of our products is widespread to support our customers' needs.widespread. Our distribution channels in other regions are less mature, and while we primarily serve the contact center markets in those regions, we are expanding into the office, mobile, gaming and computer audio, and specialty telephone markets in those locations.

Our commercial distributors include technology and electronics distributors that operate globally, headset specialists, and national and regional wholesalers.  The wholesalers typically offer a wide variety of products from multiple vendors to both resellers and end users.  Our commercial distribution channel generally maintains inventory of our products.  Our distribution of specialty products includes specialized distributors, retail, government programs, audiologists, and other health care professionals.
 
We use commissioned manufacturers' representatives to assist in selling through the retail channel. Our retail channel consists of both traditional and online consumer electronics retailers, consumer products retailers and office supply distributors, wireless carriers, catalog and mail order companies, and mass merchants.  In some countries we use commissioned manufacturers' representatives to assist in selling through the retail channel. Our headsets are sold through retailers who sell headsets to corporate customers, small businesses, and to individuals who use them for a variety of personal and professional purposes.  Revenues from this channel are seasonal, with our third fiscal quarter typically being the strongest quarter due to holiday seasonality. A portion of our retail partners manage inventories on consignment.

We have a broad, diverse group of customers whose businesses are located throughout the world.  Our principal channel partners are distributors, retailers, carriers, and OEMs.  Our commercial distributors and retailers represent our first and second largest sales channels in terms of net revenues, respectively.  No customer accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated net revenues in fiscal yearyears 20122013, 20112012 or 20102011.

Our telephony OEMs, manufacturers of automatic call distributor systemssingle and other telecommunications,two tier distributors, resellers, system integrators, e-commerce partners, telephony, and computer equipment providers alsoall resell our headsets.  Contact center equipment OEMs do not typically manufacture their own peripheralcommercial headsets and end point products. Wireless carriers, retailers, and e-commerce partners also sell our consumer headsets as Plantronics-branded products and therefore, distribute our headsets underin some cases, in their own private label or as a Plantronics-branded product.  Wireless carriers do not manufacture headsets but sell our headsets as a Plantronics-branded product or under their own private label.  Telephone service providerspackaging. Carriers purchase headsetsheadset products from us for use by their own agents.  Certain service providersagents and in some cases, also reselloffer headsets to their customers.

Computer OEMs include both manufacturers of computer hardware (including PCs and specialized components and accessories for PCs) and software.  Most computer OEMs do not manufacture headsets but look for manufacturers such as Plantronics to supply headsets that can be used with their products. We supply certain headsets to computer OEMs, particularly for use in UC systems.

We also make direct sales as a General Services Administration (“GSA”) contractor to certain government agencies in the U.S. These sales did not comprise a significant portion of our net revenues in fiscal years 2013, including the National Aeronautics and Space Administration ("NASA") and other federal government agencies, including the Department of Defense.  2012 or 2011.

In addition, certain distributors are authorized resellers under a GSA schedule price list and sell our products to government customers pursuant to that agreement.  These sales did not comprise a significant portion of our net revenues in fiscal year 2012, 2011 or 2010.


6

Table of Contents

We have also established strong UC partnerships with leading providers of UC software solutions, and these partnerships enhance the sales and distribution of our products to large enterprises deploying UC solutions. In some cases, these partners also resell our solutions to customers as part of a broader communications solution.

Our products may also be purchased directly from our website at www.plantronics.com.

We continue to evaluate our logistics processes and implement new strategies to further reduce our transportation costs and improve lead-times to customers. Currently, we have distribution centers in the following locations:

Tijuana, Mexico, which provides logistics services for products destined for customers in the U.S., Canada, Asia Pacific, and Latin America regions;regions
Prague, Czech Republic, which provides logistics services for products shipped to customers in our Europe Middle East and Africa regions;regions
Suzhou, China, which provides logistics services for products shipped to customers withinin Mainland China;China
Melbourne, Australia, which provides logistics services for products shipped to the retail channel in Australia and New Zealand;Zealand
Sao Paulo, Brazil, which provides logistics services for products shipped to customers in Brazil; andBrazil
Tokyo, Japan, which provides logistics services for products shipped to customers in Japan.Japan

With respect to the above locations, we use third party warehouses in the Czech Republic, Australia, Brazil, and Japan. We operate all other warehouse facilities.

BACKLOG
 
Our backlog of unfilled orders was $36.0 million and $26.8 million at March 31, 20122013 compared to $29.6 million atand March 31, 20112012., respectively.  We include all purchase orders scheduled for future delivery over the next 12 months in backlog.  We have a “book and ship” business model whereby we fulfill the majority of orders within 48 hours of receipt of the order.  Ourorder and as such, our net revenues in any fiscal year depend primarily on orders booked and shipped in that year. In addition, our backlog is occasionally subject to cancellation or rescheduling by the customer on short notice with little or no penalty.  BecauseTherefore, there is a lack of meaningful correlation between backlog at the end of a fiscal year and the following fiscal year's net revenues. Similarly, there is a lack of meaningful correlation between year-over-year changes in backlog as compared with year-over-year changes in net revenues. As a result, we believe that backlog information is not material to an understanding of our “book and ship” model, as well as the uncertainty of order cancellations or rescheduling, we do not believe our backlog as of any particular date is indicative of actual sales for any future period and; therefore, should not be used as a measure of future revenue.overall business.
 
MANUFACTURING AND SOURCES OF MATERIALS
 
Manufacturing operations consist primarily of assembly and testing, both of which isare performed in our manufacturing facility in Tijuana, Mexico, and we maintain a small assembly operation in California primarily for custom products.Mexico.  We outsource the manufacturing of our Bluetooth products to a third party manufacturermanufacturers in China. We also outsource the manufacturing of a limited number of our other products to third parties, typically in China and other countries in Asia.  See further discussion on our business risks associated with our manufacturers under the risk titled, “We depend on original design manufacturers and contract manufacturers who may not have adequate capacity to fulfill our needs or may not meet our quality and delivery objectives, which could have an adverse effect on our business” within Item 1A Risk Factors ofin this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We purchase the components for our products primarily from suppliers in Asia, Mexico, the U.S., and Europe, including proprietary semi-custom integrated circuits, amplifier boards, and other electrical components, primarily from suppliers in Asia, Mexico, the U.S., and Europe.components.  The majority of the components and sub-assemblies used in our manufacturing operations are obtained, or are reasonably available, from dual-source suppliers, although we do have a number of sole-source suppliers.

We procure materials to meet forecasted customer requirements.  Special products and certain large orders are quoted for delivery after receipt of orders at specific lead times.  We maintain minimum levels of finished goods based on market demand, in addition to inventories of raw materials, work in process, and sub-assemblies, and components.  In addition, certain vendors maintain inventoriesa substantial portion of the raw materials, components, and sub-assemblies used in our products are provided by our suppliers on a consignment which primarily consist of finished goods and components.basis.  Refer to "Off Balance Sheet Arrangements" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional details regarding consigned inventories. We write-down inventory items determined to be either excess or obsolete to the lower of cost or markettheir net realizable value.


7

Table of Contents

ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
 
We are required to comply and are currently in compliance with the European Union ("EU") and other Directives on the Restrictions of the use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment (“RoHS”) and on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment ("WEEE") requirements.  Additionally, we believe we are compliant with the RoHS initiatives in China and Korea.
 

7

Table of Contents

We are subject to various federal, state, local, and foreign environmental laws and regulations, including those governing the use, discharge, and disposal of hazardous substances in the ordinary course of our manufacturing process.  We believe that our current manufacturing and other operations comply in all material respects with applicable environmental laws and regulations; however, it is possible that future environmental legislation may be enacted or current environmental legislation may be interpreted to create an environmental liability with respect to our facilities, operations, or product.products. See further discussion on our business risks associated with environmental legislation under the risk titled, "We are subject to environmental laws and regulations that expose us to a number of risks and could result in significant liabilities and costs" within Item 1A Risk Factors of this Form 10-K.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
 
We maintain a program of seeking patent protection for our technologies when we believe it is commercially appropriate.  As of March 31, 20122013, we had approximately 570600 worldwide patents in force, expiring between calendar years 20122013 and 2035.2038.

We intend to continue to seekseeking patents on our inventions when commercially appropriate. Our success will depend in part on our ability to obtain patents and preserve other intellectual property rights covering the design and operation of our products.  See further discussion on our business risks associated with our intellectual property under the risk titled, "Our intellectual property rights could be infringed on by others, and we may infringe on the intellectual property rights of others resulting in claims or lawsuits. Even if we prevail, claims and lawsuits are costly and time consuming to pursue or defend and may divert management's time from our business" within Item 1A Risk Factors of this Form 10-K.
 
We own trademark registrations in the U.S. and a number of other countries with respect to the Plantronics and Clarity trademarks, as well as the names of many of our products and product features.  We currently have pending U.S. and foreign trademark applications pending in connection with certain new products and product features.  We also attempt to protect our trade secrets and other proprietary information through comprehensive security measures, including agreements with customers and suppliers, and proprietary information agreements with employees and consultants.  We may seek copyright protection where we believe it is applicable.  We own a number of domain name registrations and intend to seek more as appropriate.  There can be no assurance that our existing or future copyright registrations, trademarks, trade secrets, or domain names will be of sufficient scope or strength or provide meaningful protection or any commercial advantage to us.


8

Table of Contents

EMPLOYEES
 
On March 31, 20122013, we employed approximately 3,1003,400 people worldwide, including approximately 2,1002,300 employees at our manufacturing facility in Tijuana, Mexico.  To our knowledge, no employees are currently covered by collective bargaining agreements.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Set forth in the table below is certain information regarding the executive team of Plantronics:

NAME AGE POSITION
Ken Kannappan *
 5253 President and Chief Executive Officer (presently on leave of absence)
Barbara Scherer Pamela Strayer *
 5644 Senior Vice President Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer and Acting Interim Chief Executive Officer
Joe Burton * 4748 Senior Vice President of Engineering and Development and Chief Technology Officer
Alejandro Bustamante57Senior Vice President, Worldwide Operations
Don Houston *
 5759 Senior Vice President, Sales
Susan Lovegren52Senior Vice President, Human Resources
Barry Margerum 6061 Chief Strategy Officer
Marilyn Mersereau 5859 Senior Vice President, Marketing and Chief Marketing Officer
Renee Niemi *
 4748 Senior Vice President, Communication Solutions
Carsten Trads 5658 President, Clarity Division
Philip Vanhoutte *
 5657 Managing Director, Europe Middle East &and Africa
Patricia Wadors47Senior Vice President, Human Resources
Larry Wuerz54Senior Vice President, Worldwide Operations
*    Executive is also considered an Executive Officer as defined under Regulation S-K Item 401(b).

Mr. Kannappan joined Plantronics in 1995 as Vice President of Sales and was promoted to various positions prior to being named President and Chief Operating Officer in March 1998.  In January 1999, he was promoted to Chief Executive Officer and has been a member of our Board of Directors since 1999.  Prior to joining Plantronics, Mr. Kannappan served as Senior Vice President of Investment Banking for Kidder, Peabody & Co. Incorporated, where he was employed from 1985 to 1995.that date.  Mr. Kannappan currently serves onas Chairman of the Board of Directors at Mattson Technology, Inc., a supplier of advanced process equipment for the semiconductor industry.  Mr. Kannappan has a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics from Yale University and a Master of Business Administration from Stanford University.

On April 14, 2013, Mr. Kannappan commenced a temporary medical leave of absence to address a treatable form of cancer. Mr. Kannappan is expected to be on leave for approximately four months and during this time, he will stay involved in directing the Company to the extent practical and will remain a member of the Board of Directors. The Company's Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer, Pamela Strayer, will serve as the acting Interim Chief Executive Officer during Mr. Kannappan's absence.

Ms. SchererStrayer joined Plantronics in 1997July 2012 as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and is responsible for all aspects of the Company's financial management, in addition to managing the information technology, legal, and investor relations organizations. Prior to joining Plantronics, from 2005 to 2012, Ms. Strayer held senior financial management roles at Autodesk, Inc., a world leading software design and services company. Most recently, Ms. Strayer served as Autodesk's Vice President of Finance, & AdministrationCorporate Controller, and Chief Financial Officer.  In 1998, Ms. SchererPrincipal Accounting Officer, where she was promoted to Senior Vice President of Finance & Administrationresponsible for establishing a long-term strategy for the corporate controller organization and Chief Financial Officer.managing a global team responsible for SEC reporting and compliance, the financial close process, revenue accounting, credit and collections, mergers and acquisitions finance, and payroll. Prior to joining Plantronics, Ms. Scherer held various executive management positions in the data storage industry, principally with Micropolis Corporation. She also performed strategic planning with the Boston Consulting Group and was a member of the corporate finance team at ARCO.  In September 2004, Ms. Scherer joined the Board of Directors of Keithley Instruments, a test and measurement company, on which she servedAutodesk, from 2000 until the company was acquired in December 2010. In August 2011,2005, Ms. Scherer was elected to the Board of Directors of Netgear,Strayer held senior finance positions at Epiphany, Inc., a global networking company that delivers innovative products to consumers, businessesdeveloped customer relationship management software. Earlier in her career, Ms. Strayer worked for Informix Software, Inc., a developer of database software for computers, and service providers.in audit services at KPMG, LLP. Ms. Scherer has Bachelor degreesStrayer holds a bachelor's degree in Economics and Environmental Studies from the University of California, Santa Barbara and received a Master of Business Administration from the Yale SchoolThe Ohio State University and is a California licensed Certified Public Accountant.


9

Table of Organization and Management.  Contents

Mr. Burton joined Plantronics in 2011 as Chief Technology Officer and Senior Vice President of Engineering and Development.Development and Chief Technology Officer. Prior to joining Plantronics, Mr. Burton held various executive management, engineering leadership, strategy, and architecture-level positions. From October 2010 to May 2011, Mr. Burton was employed by Polycom, Inc., a global provider of unified communications solutions for telepresence, video and voice, most recently as Executive Vice President, Chief Strategy and Technology Officer and, for a period of time, as General Manager, Service Provider concurrently with his technology leadership role. From 2001 to 2010, Mr. Burton was employed by Cisco Systems, Inc., a global provider of networking equipment, and served in various roles with increasing responsibility including Vice President and Chief Technology Officer for Unified Communications and Vice President, SaaS Platform Engineering, Collaboration Software Group. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Computer Information Systems from Excelsior College (formerly Regents College) and attended the Stanford Executive Program.

9

TableMr. Bustamante joined Plantronics in July 1994 as President of ContentsPlantronics Mexico. In June 2012, Mr. Bustamante was promoted to Senior Vice President of Worldwide Operations and is responsible for leading Plantronics' operations and supply chain across both commercial and retail sectors.  Prior to joining Plantronics, from 1991 to 1994, Mr. Bustamante held several key executive positions in operations management at Matrix Aeronautica, a joint venture between Mexico and Hong Kong, to repair and overhaul commercial aircraft.  From 1986 to 1991, Mr. Bustamante served as Executive Vice President of Offshore Factories, a shelter operation that provided support for foreign companies to set up manufacturing operations in Mexico. Mr. Bustamante holds a Bachelor of Science degree from La Salle University in Mexico City and a Master of Business Administration from Pepperdine University.


Mr. Houston joined Plantronics in 1996 as Vice President of Sales and was promoted to Senior Vice President of Sales in 1998.   From 1995 through 1996, Mr. Houston served as Vice President of Worldwide Sales for Proxima Corporation, a designer, developer, manufacturer, and marketer of multi-media projection products.  From 1985 to 1995, Mr. Houston held various management positions at Calcomp, Inc., a company engaged in the business of manufacturing computer peripherals for the CAD and graphic market.  Prior to 1985, Mr. Houston held various sales and marketing management positions with IBM Corporation.  Mr. Houston graduated from the University of Arizona with a Bachelor of Science degree in Business/Marketing.

Ms. Lovegren joined Plantronics in 2013 as Senior Vice President of Human Resources. Prior to joining Plantronics, from 2006 to 2013, Ms. Lovegren was employed by Juniper Networks, a global provider of networking equipment and software. At Juniper Networks, from 2008 to 2013, Ms. Lovegren served as Corporate Vice President, Business Aligned Human Resources, Predictive Analytics and Global Access HR Organization, and from 2006 to 2008, she served as Senior Director, Human Resources.  Prior to her employment at Juniper Networks, Ms. Lovegren served in various roles in human resources management at Agilent Technologies and Hewlett-Packard. Ms. Lovegren has a Bachelor of Arts degree in Communications from San Jose State University and a Master of Science degree in Human Resources Management from Golden Gate University.

Mr. Margerum joined Plantronics in 1994 as Vice President of Marketing and was promoted in 1996 to President and General Manager of the Computer and Mobile Systems Group.  In 1997, he left Plantronics to become President and CEO of Euphonix, Inc., a public company in the high-end audio equipment space.  In 2000, he re-joined Plantronics and in 2004, he became Vice President of Strategy and Business Development, and in 2008, he was named Chief Strategy Officer.Officer in 2008.  Prior to joining Plantronics, from 1989 to 1994, Mr. Margerum was CEO of MITEM Corporation, a middleware software company.company serving the healthcare industry.  From 1980 to 1989, he held a variety of marketing and sales positions, including Vice President of Marketing for GRiD Systems Corporation, a laptop computer manufacturer.   Mr. Margerum also serves on the Board of Directors of MITEM Corporation. Mr. Margerum holds a Bachelor of Science in Engineering from Princeton University and a Master of Business Administration from Stanford University.

Ms. Mersereau joined Plantronics in April 2012 as Senior Vice President, Marketing and Chief Marketing Officer.  Prior to joining Plantronics, from November 2011 to February 2012, Ms. Mersereau served as Chief Marketing Officer and Senior Vice President of C3 Energy Network, a provider of energy management software solutions. From 2002 to 2011, at Cisco Systems, Inc., a global provider of networking equipment, Ms. Mersereau served in various roles of increasing responsibility including Senior Vice President of Corporate Marketing. Earlier in her career, Ms. Mersereau served in various senior marketing roles at  IBM, Coca-Cola, Wendy's, and Burger King International. Ms. Mersereau holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Western Ontario. 

Ms. Niemi joined Plantronics in 2005 as Vice President and General Manager, Mobile and Entertainment.  In 2009, she was promoted to Senior Vice President, Communications Solutions.  Prior to joining Plantronics, Ms. Niemi held senior positions with companies such as Visto Corporation, Mobilesys, Inc., Xircom, and NEC Technologies, and was most recently at Danger, Inc.  Ms. Niemi graduated from Santa Clara University with a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical Engineering.  She also earned a certificate in General Management for High Technology from Stanford University's IEEE Joint Program.


10

Table of Contents

Mr. Trads joined Clarity (formerly Walker-Ameriphone) in 2003 as President. Prior to joining Plantronics, from 1994 to 1998, Mr. Trads served as a Senior Vice President at GN Resound. From 1998 to 2003, Mr. Trads served as President of GN Resounds' North American operation. From 1991 to 1994, Mr. Trads was Vice President of Sales and Marketing for Dancall Radio A/S, a manufacturer of cell phones and cordless phones. Mr. Trads holds a degree in Business Administration and Management from the Copenhagen Business School in Denmark.

Mr. Vanhoutte joined Plantronics in 2003 as Managing Director of Europe, Middle East, and Africa (“EMEA”).  Effective for fiscal year 2013, Mr. Vanhoutte will serveserved as Managing Director of Europe and Africa. Prior to joining Plantronics, from 2001 to 2003, Mr. Vanhoutte served as Corporate Vice President of Marketing at Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications. In 2001, he served as Vice President of Strategic Market Development at Ericsson's Personal Communications Division. From 1998 until 2000, he served as Senior Vice President of Products, Marketing and Sales at MCI WorldCom's International Division in London.  Mr. Vanhoutte held various management positions at Dell Computer Corporation and Nokia Data, which was merged into Fujitsu-ICL Systems Inc. Mr. Vanhoutte studied Applied Economics and Engineering at the University of Leuven, Belgium.
Ms. Wadors joined Plantronics in 2010 as Senior Vice President of Human Resources and Facilities. Prior to joining Plantronics, Ms. Wadors worked at Yahoo, Inc. where she served as Senior Vice President of Total Rewards, Systems and Mergers and Acquisitions - Human Resources from 2009 to 2010, and as Senior Vice President of World Wide Business Partners - Human Resources from 2007 to 2009. Ms. Wadors has held various human resource management positions with Align Technology, Inc., Applied Materials, Inc., Merck & Co., Inc. and Viacom, Inc. Ms. Wadors graduated from Ramapo College with a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration with a focus in Human Resource Management.
Mr. Wuerz joined Plantronics in 2007 as Senior Vice President of Worldwide Operations.  Prior to Plantronics, Mr. Wuerz spent 28 years at Hewlett-Packard Company ("HP") where he held several senior positions.  Most recently, Mr. Wuerz was the Worldwide Vice President of Operations and Supply Chain for the Desktop Personal Computer organization, including consumer, commercial and workstation PCs. Prior to this role, Mr. Wuerz held the same title for HP's Consumer Desktop Personal Computer organization.  In addition to Mr. Wuerz's operations roles at HP, he also held senior positions in other functional areas, including Research and Development and Human Resources.  Mr. Wuerz holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Missouri - Rolla and a Master of Science in Electrical Engineering degree from Stanford University.

10

Table of Contents

Executive officers serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.  There are no family relationships between any of the directors and executive officers of Plantronics.
 

11

Table of Contents

ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS
 
Investors in our stockYou should carefully consider the following risk factors in connection with any investment in our stock.  Our stock price will reflect the performance of our business relative to, among other things, our competition, expectations of securities analysts or investors, and general economic market conditions and industry conditions.  Our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially adversely affected if any of the following risks occur.  Accordingly, the trading price of our stock could decline, and investors could lose all or part of their investment.
 
Adverse or uncertain economic conditions may materially adversely affect the Company.us.

Our operations and performance are dependent on worldwide economic conditions. Uncertainty regarding future economic conditions makes it more challenging for us to forecast operating results, make business decisions, and identify the risks that may affect our business, sources and uses of cash, financial condition, and results of operations. Global economic concerns, such as the recurrenceuncertain and slow pace of recession on a regionaleconomic recovery or global basisgrowth worldwide and the continued economic downturn in certain regions of Europe and the Asia Pacific region, have increased uncertainty and unpredictability for our business as consumers and addedbusinesses postpone or forego spending, increasing risk to our future outlook. A global economic downturn, inconsistent or declining business hiring, a downturnrecurrence of recession in the U.S. or a more severe downturn in Europe, whether short-term or prolonged, couldmay result in reductions in sales of our products, longer sales cycles, slower adoption of new technologies, increased price competition, and customer and supplier bankruptcies.

Replacement cycles of our Office and Contact Center ("OCC") headset products, in particular, are impacted by lower voluntary employee turnover as new headset demand is typically created when employees change employers and transition to new job opportunities. In the current economic environment, post-recession inconsistent domestic and international business hiring has perpetuated employee reluctance to change jobs and limits the opportunities for unemployed workers to reenter the workforce. As a consequence, voluntary employee turnover rates remain below historic non-recessionary levels which, therefore, impedes sales of our OCC headsets.

Financial institutions continue to experience significant market pressure and increasing regulatory scrutiny most recently in connection with a variety of factors and events, including lenders' exposure to the sovereign debt of countries like Greece, Italy, Spain, Cyprus, Portugal and Spain.failures of financial services institutions and low liquidity levels. As a result of the pressure and regulatory scrutiny, lenders may be more likely to further consolidate, cease to do business, or be required to meet increased compulsory capitalization thresholds, any of which could result in afurther tightening of the credit markets, a low level of liquidity in many financial markets, and increased volatility in fixed income, credit, currency, and equity markets. There could be a number of negative effects on our business, including impaired credit availability, and increased financial instability and cautionary spending practices of our customers, suppliers, and distributors, and other sales channel sources. Any of these events could harm our business, results of operations, and financial condition.


11

Table of ContentsUncertainty regarding future economic conditions also makes it more challenging

In August 2011, Congress enacted the Budget Control Act of 2011 (“BCA”), committing the U.S. government to significantly reduce the federal deficit over ten years. The BCA contains provisions commonly referred to as “sequestration”, which call for us to forecast operating results, make business decisions,substantial, unspecified automatic spending cuts split between defense and identify the risksnon-defense programs that may affectcontinue for a period of ten years.  In January 2013, Congress enacted the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, which temporarily postponed enactment of the sequestration provisions for approximately two months. The sequestration cuts went into effect at the beginning of March 2013 and the impact of the spending reductions have only recently begun to spread through the economy. Likewise, various European governments have implemented or intend to implement austerity measures intended to reduce government spending, which has, and in the future, will likely reduce demand for our business, sourcesproducts directly by affected governmental agencies and usesby our customers who derive all or a portion of cash, financial conditiontheir revenues from these governmental agencies. We cannot currently predict the impact of governmental spending reductions on us or our customers or whether and to what extent our business and results of operations. operations may be adversely harmed.

Further, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates may impact our revenues and profitability because we report our financial statements in U.S. Dollars ("USD"), whereas a significant portion of our sales to customers are transacted in other currencies, particularly the Euro and the Great Britain Pound (“GBP”). We hedge a portion of our Euro and GBP forecasted revenue exposure for the future, typically over a twelve month period. We can offer no assurance that such strategies will be effective in minimizing our exposure. If the Euro and GBP fall against the USD, our revenues, gross profit, and profitability in the future could be negatively affected. See also our risk titled, “We are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates which may adversely affect our revenues, gross profit, and profitability.”

Our operating results are difficult to predict, and fluctuations may cause volatility in the trading price of our common stock.

Given the nature of the markets in which we compete, our revenues and profitability are difficult to predict for many reasons, including the following:




Our operating results are highly dependent on the volume and timing of orders received during the quarter. Customers generally order on an as-needed basis, and we typically do not obtain firm, long-term purchase commitments from our customers, making forecasting difficult. As a result, our revenues in any quarter depend primarily on orders booked and shipped in that quarter.
Our operating results are highly dependent on the volume and timing of orders received during the quarter. Customers generally order on an as-needed basis, and we typically do not obtain firm, long-term purchase commitments from them, making forecasting difficult. As a result, our revenues in any quarter depend primarily on orders booked and shipped in that quarter, which fluctuate for many reasons beyond our control, including customers' sales promotions and campaigns, large customer deployments of Unified Communications ("UC") infrastructure, general economic conditions, seasonality, customer cancellations and rescheduling, and fluctuating employment opportunities that increase or reduce employee turnover and, thereby, new headset needs.




We incur a large portion of our costs in advance of sales orders because we must plan research and production, order components and enter into development, incur sales and marketing expenditures, and other operating commitments prior to obtaining firm commitments from our customers. In the event our inventories for one or more products exceed demand, the risk of future inventory write-downs increases. Conversely, in the event we have inadequate inventory to timely meet the demand for particular products, we may miss significant revenue opportunities or incur significant expenses such as air freight, costs for expediting shipments, and other negative variances in our manufacturing processes as we attempt to make up for the shortfall.  When a significant portion of our revenue is derived from new products, forecasting appropriate volumes of production is even more difficult.
Our gross margins can vary for a number of reasons, including customer demand, competition, product life cycle, new product introductions, unit volumes, commodity and supply chain costs, geographic sales mix, foreign currency exchange rates, and the complexity and functionality of new product innovations. Moreover, there are significant variances in gross profit percentages between our higher and lower margin products such that small variations in product mix, which can be difficult to predict, can materially impact gross profit. Additionally, if we are unable to timely introduce new products within projected costs, product demand is less than anticipated, there are product pricing, marketing and other initiatives by our competitors to which we need to react or that are initiated by us to drive sales that lower our margins, then our overall gross margin will decrease. Our gross margins also vary significantly by sales geography and customer type. When the mix of products sold shifts from higher margin product lines to lower margin product lines, to lower margin sales geographies, or to lower margin products within product lines, our overall gross margins and our profitability may be adversely affected and create unanticipated fluctuations in our operating results, which may cause volatility in the price of our common stock.

We incur a large portion of our costs in advance of customer orders because we must plan research and production, order materials and components, commence manufacturing, incur sales and marketing expenditures, and other operating commitments prior to obtaining firm commitments from our customers. In the event inventories for one or more products exceed demand, the risk of inventory write-downs increases. Conversely, in the event we have inadequate inventory to timely meet the demand for particular products, we may miss significant revenue opportunities or incur significant expenses such as air freight, costs for expediting shipments, and other negative variances in our manufacturing processes as we attempt to make up for the shortfall.  When a significant portion of our revenue is derived from new products, forecasting appropriate volumes of production is even more difficult.

12

Table of Contents


Increasingly, we are incorporating software features and functionalities into our products, offering firmware and software fixes, updates and upgrades electronically over the Internet and developing standalone software applications. Rules and policies regarding revenue recognition in connection with software are determined by regulations promulgated by national accounting standards bodies and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). As the nature and extent of software integration in our products increases or if sales of standalone software applications become more material to our revenues, the way we report our revenue related to our products could be significantly affected by these rules and policies. For example, we could be required to recognize revenue in connection with headset sales over an extended period of time instead of at the time of sale as we have done traditionally. Moreover, the software revenue recognition rules are complex and dynamic. If we fail to accurately apply these complex rules and policies to our business, we may incorrectly report revenues in one or more quarterly or annual periods. If this were to occur and the error were to be material, we may be required to restate our financial statements, which could materially, negatively impact our results for the affected periods, cause our stock price to decline, and result in securities class actions or other similar litigation.

Fluctuations in our operating results, including the failure to meet our expectations or the expectations of financial analysts, may cause volatility, including material decreases, in the trading price of our common stock.


12

Table of Contents

The success of our business depends heavily on our ability to effectively market our UC products, and our business could be materially adversely affected if markets do not develop as we expect.

We compete in the business market for the saleOur OCC products represent our largest source of our office and contact center products.revenue.  We believe that our greatest long-term opportunity for revenue and profit growth in the OCC market and overall is in the UC office market, and our foremost strategic objective for this segment is to increase headset adoption. UC is the integration of voice and video-based communications systems enhanced with software applications and Internet Protocol (“IP”) networks. It may include the integration or consolidation of devices and media associated with a variety of business workflows and applications, including e-mail, instant messaging, presence, audio, video and web conferencing, and unified messaging. UC seeks to provide seamless connectivity and user experience for enterprise workers regardless of their location and environment, improving overall business efficiency and providing more effective collaboration among an increasingly distributed workforce. We continue to invest in the development of new products and to enhance existing products to be more appealing in functionality and design for the UC market. In addition, in 2012 we introduced our developer community, Plantronics Developer Connection (the "PDC"), to enable third party developers to utilize the functionality of our UC portfolio in their product offerings. However, it remains unclear if the PDC will successfully generate sufficient third party developer interest in new or unique uses for our UC products to expand the rate or extent of their adoption. We also target certain vertical segments to increase sales.  We continue to believe that the implementation of UC technologies by large corporationsenterprises will be a significant long-term driver of enterprise UC headset adoption, and, as a result, a key long-term driver of revenue and product growth. However,growth; however, we can give no assurance that significant growth in UC will occur or that we will be able to take advantage of any growth that does occur.

Our ability to realize our UC plans and to achieve the financial results projected to arise from UC adoption could be adversely affected by a number of factors, including:including the following:




The risk that, as UC becomes more widely adopted, competitors will offer solutions that will effectively commoditize our headsets which, in turn, will reduce the sales prices for our headsets.
As UC becomes more widely adopted, the risk that competitors will offer solutions that will effectively commoditize our headsets, which, in turn, will reduce the sales prices for our headsets.



Our plans are dependent upon the market success of major platform providers such as Microsoft Corporation, Cisco Systems, Inc., Avaya, Inc., Alcatel-Lucent, and IBM, and we have limited ability to influence such providers with respect to the functionality of their platforms, their rate of deployment, and their willingness to integrate their platforms with our solutions.




The development of UC solutions is technically complex and this may delay or obstruct our ability to introduce solutions that are cost effective, feature-rich, stable and attractive to our customers on a timely basis.
Our plans are dependent upon the market success of major platform providers and strategic partners such as Microsoft Corporation, Cisco Systems, Inc., Avaya, Inc., Alcatel-Lucent, and IBM, and we have limited ability to influence such providers with respect to the functionality of their platforms and product offerings, their rate of deployment, and their willingness to integrate their platforms and product offerings with our solutions.




Our development of UC solutions is dependent on our ability to implement and execute new and different processes in connection with the design, development and manufacturing of complex electronic systems comprised of hardware, firmware and software that must work in a wide variety of environments and multiple variations, which may in some instances increase the risk of development delays or errors and require the hiring of new personnel and/or third party contractors.
The development of UC solutions is technically complex and may delay or limit our ability to introduce solutions that are cost effective, feature-rich, stable, and attractive to our customers on a timely basis.




Because UC offerings involve complex integration of hardware and software with UC infrastructure, our sales model and expertise will need to continue to evolve.  If we fail to anticipate or effectively implement changes in our sales model or channel our selling techniques and efforts at the primary UC decision makers within enterprises, our ability to maintain and grow our share of the UC market may be adversely impacted.
Our development of UC solutions is dependent on our ability to implement and execute new and different processes in connection with the design, development, and manufacturing of complex electronic systems composed of hardware, firmware, and software that must work in a wide variety of environments and multiple variations, which in some instances may increase the risk of development delays or errors and require the hiring of new personnel and/or third party contractors at increased cost.




As UC becomes more widely adopted we anticipate that competition for market share will increase, and some competitors may have superior technical and economic resources.
Because UC offerings involve complex integration of hardware and software with UC infrastructure, our sales model and expertise will need to continue to evolve.  If we fail to anticipate or effectively implement changes in our sales model or channel our selling techniques and efforts at the primary UC decision makers within enterprises, our ability to maintain and grow our share of the UC market may be adversely impacted.




UC solutions may not be adopted with the breadth and speed in the marketplace that we currently anticipate.
Competition for market share is anticipated to increase, and some competitors may have superior technical and economic resources.




UC may evolve rapidly and unpredictably and our ability to adapt to those changes and future requirements may impact our profitability in this market and our overall margins.

13

Table of Contents

UC solutions may not be adopted with the breadth and speed in the marketplace that we currently anticipate and sales cycles for more complex UC deployments may substantially increase over our traditional OCC products.

UC may evolve rapidly and unpredictably and our inability to timely and cost-effectively adapt to those changes and future requirements may impact our profitability in this market and our overall margins.

Because the major providers of UC software utilize complex and proprietary platforms in which our UC products will be integrated, it will beis necessary for us to expand our technical support capabilities. This expansion will result in additional expenses to hire and train the personnel and develop the infrastructure necessary to adequately serve our UC customers. Our support expenditures may substantially increase over time as these platforms evolve and as UC becomes more commonly adopted.

If theseour investments doin, and strategic focus on, UC does not generate incremental revenue, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.  


13

Table of Contents

The failure of our suppliers to provide quality components or services in a timely manner could adversely affect our results of operations.

Our growth and ability to meet customer demand depends in part on our ability to timely obtain sufficient quantities of raw materials, components, sub-assemblies, and products of acceptable quality from our suppliers. We buy raw materials, components, and sub-assemblies from a variety of suppliers and assemble them into finished products. We also haveIn addition, certain of our components and products are manufactured for us by third party suppliers. The cost, quality, and availability of such goods are essential to the successful production and sale of our products. Obtaining raw materials, components, sub-assemblies, and finished products entails various risks, including the following:




Rapid increases in production levels to meet unanticipated demand for our products could result in higher costs for components and sub-assemblies, increased expenditures for freight to expedite delivery of required materials, and higher overtime costs and other expenses. These higher expenditures could reduce our profit margins. Further, if production is increased rapidly, there may be decreased manufacturing yields, which may also reduce our margins.
Rapid increases in production levels to meet unanticipated demand for our products could result in higher costs for components and sub-assemblies, increased expenditures for freight to expedite delivery of required materials, and higher overtime costs and other expenses, which could reduce our profit margins. Further, if production is increased rapidly, manufacturing yields may decrease, which may also reduce our margins.




We obtain certain raw materials, sub-assemblies, components, and products from certain raw materials, sub-assemblies, components and products from single suppliers, including a majority of our Bluetooth products from GoerTek, Inc. Alternate sources for these items may not be readily available or at acceptable prices. Any failure of GoerTek or our other suppliers to remain in business, provide us with the quantity of components or products that we need or purchase the raw materials, subcomponents and parts required to produce and provide to us the components or products we need could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.Bluetooth products from GoerTek, Inc. Alternate sources for these items may not be readily available or at acceptable prices. Any failure of GoerTek or our other suppliers to remain in business, provide us with the quantity of components or products that we need or purchase the raw materials, subcomponents and parts of acceptable quality required to produce and provide the components or products we need could, among other things, delay our ability to meet demand for our products or require us to incur additional costs to obtain components from other suppliers, if alternative sources are available at all.




Although we generally use standard raw materials, parts and components for our products, the high development costs associated with existing and emerging wireless and other technologies may require us to work with a single source of silicon chips, chip-sets or other components or materials (“components or materials”) on any particular product. We, or any of our suppliers of components or materials, may experience challenges in designing, developing and manufacturing components or materials using these new technologies which could affect our ability to meet market schedules.  Our components or materials suppliers may decide for commercial reasons to discontinue components or materials that we have designed into our products or may cease doing business completely due to adverse economic conditions or otherwise. Due to our dependence on single suppliers for certain components or materials, we could experience higher prices, a delay in development of the components or materials, be forced to redesign or end of life products, make large last-time buys which are held in inventory for extended periods of time or be unable to meet customer demand for these products.  If this occurs, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected as a result of these factors.
Although we generally use standard raw materials, parts, and components for our products, the high development costs associated with existing and emerging wireless and other technologies may require us to work with a single source of silicon chips, chip-sets, or other components or materials (“components or materials”) on any particular product. We, or any of our suppliers, may experience challenges in designing, developing, and manufacturing components or materials using these new technologies, which could affect our ability to meet market schedules.  Our suppliers may decide for commercial reasons to discontinue components or materials that we have designed into our products or may cease doing business completely due to adverse economic conditions or otherwise. Due to our dependence on single suppliers for certain components or materials, if our suppliers cease making the components or materials we use or cannot meet our demand, we could experience higher prices, a delay in manufacturing of the components or materials, be forced to redesign or end of life products, make large last-time buys which are held in inventory for extended periods of time or be unable to meet customer demand.  If this occurs, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.




Because of the lead times required to obtain certain raw materials, sub-assemblies, components and products from certain suppliers, we may not be able to react quickly to changes in demand, potentially resulting in either excess inventories of such goods or materials, sub-assemblies, components and product shortages. Lead times are particularly long on silicon-based components incorporating radio frequency and digital signal processing technologies and such components make up an increasingly larger portion of our product costs.  In particular, many consumer product orders have shorter lead times than the component lead times, making it increasingly necessary to carry more inventory in anticipation of those orders, which may not materialize.  Failure to synchronize the timing of purchases of raw materials, sub-assemblies, components and products to meet demand could increase our inventories and/or decrease our revenues and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Because of the lead times required to obtain certain raw materials, sub-assemblies, components, and products from certain suppliers, we may be unable to react quickly to changes in demand, potentially resulting in either (i) excess inventories of such goods or materials, sub-assemblies, or components, or (ii) product shortages. Lead times are particularly long for silicon-based components incorporating radio frequency and digital signal processing technologies and such components make up an increasingly larger portion of our product costs.  In particular, many consumer product orders have shorter lead times than component lead times, making it increasingly necessary to carry more inventory in anticipation of orders, which may not materialize.  Failure to synchronize the timing of purchases of raw materials, sub-assemblies, components, and products to meet demand could increase our inventories and/or decrease our revenues and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.



We buy most of our raw materials, components and subassemblies on a purchase order basis and do not have long-term commitments from our suppliers as to price or supply. Prices for many commodities are rising and are increasing our costs. Additionally, if our suppliers experience increased demand or shortages, it could affect the timeliness of deliveries to us. Any such shortages or further increases in prices could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.




As part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") has proposed disclosure requirements regarding the use of certain minerals, known as conflict minerals, which are mined from the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining countries, as well as procedures regarding a manufacturer's efforts to prevent the sourcing of such minerals and metals produced from those minerals. The implementation of these requirements could affect the sourcing and availability of metals used in the manufacture of a limited number of raw material parts contained in our products. For example, the implementation of these disclosure requirements may decrease the number of suppliers capable of supplying our needs for certain metals, thereby negatively affecting our ability to obtain products in sufficient quantities or at competitive prices. Our material sourcing is broad based and multi-tiered, and we may not be able to conclusively verify the origins for all metals used in our products.


14

Table of Contents

Prices for commodities may rise based on demands from within our industry and other industries with which we compete for raw materials and components. Additionally, if our suppliers experience increased demand or shortages, it could affect the timeliness of deliveries to us and our customers. Any such shortages or further increases in prices could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

As part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the SEC adopted disclosure requirements regarding the use of certain minerals, known as conflict minerals, which are mined from the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining countries, as well as procedures regarding a manufacturer's efforts to identify and prevent the sourcing of such minerals and metals produced from those minerals. The disclosure requirements became effective for calendar year 2013. The implementation of these requirements could affect the sourcing and availability of metals used in the manufacture of a limited number of parts contained in our products. For example, the implementation of these disclosure requirements may decrease the number of suppliers capable of supplying our needs for certain metals, thereby negatively affecting our ability to obtain products in sufficient quantities or at competitive prices. Our material sourcing is broad based and multi-tiered, and we may be unable to conclusively verify the origins for all metals used in our products. We may suffer financial and reputational harm if customers require, and we are unable to deliver, certification that our products are conflict free. Regardless, we will incur additional costs associated with compliance with these disclosure requirements, including time-consuming and costly efforts to determine the source of any conflict minerals used in our products.

If we do notfail to forecast demand for our products or successfully match production to demand, we may lose business, become obligated to purchase consigned inventory, or our gross margins could be materially adversely affected.

Our industry is characterized by rapid technological changes, evolving industry standards, frequent new product introductions, short-term customer commitments and changes in demand. We determine productionProduction levels are forecasted based on our forecasts ofanticipated and actual demand for our products. Actual demand for our products depends on many factors, which makes it difficult to forecast. In view of the uncertainties inherent in the recovery from the global recession, including the pace and scale of the recovery, itIt is particularly difficult to make accurate forecasts because of the uncertainties inherent in this business environment.global and regional economies. Significant unanticipated fluctuations in product supply or demand could cause operating problems. For example, if forecasted demand does not develop, we could have excess inventory and capacity.  We have experienced differences between our actual and our forecasted demand in the past and expect differences to arise in the future.

SomeWe will lose opportunities to increase revenues and profits, may incur penalties for late delivery, and may be unable to later sell the excess inventory if we are unable to timely deliver products to meet the market window of our retail customers. Conversely, over-forecast of demand could result in higher inventories of finished products, components, and sub-assemblies. For example, because our retail business has pronounced seasonality, we typically build inventory well in advance of the December quarter to stock up for the anticipated demand.  If we are unable to sell these inventories, we may have to write off some or all of our inventories of excess products, unusable components, and sub-assemblies.

Moreover, a substantial portion of the raw materials, components, and subassemblies used in our products are provided by our suppliers on a consignment basis. As such, we do not take possession of and title to the raw materials, components and subassemblies until they are consumed in the production process. Prior to consumption in the production process, title and risk of loss to consigned inventory remains solely with the suppliers. Consigned inventory not consumed in the production process is returnable to our suppliers in accordance with the terms of our agreements with them. If we purchase all or a material portion of the materials and components consigned by our suppliers, we could incur unanticipated expenses, including write-downs for excess and obsolete inventory, which, if material, could negatively affect our business and financial results.

In addition, some of our products utilize long-lead time parts, which are only available from a limited set of vendors. The combined effects of variability of demand amongfrom our customer basecustomers with significant long-lead time of single sourced materials has in the past contributed to significant inventory write-downs, particularly for our consumer products.

Furthermore, suppliers may choose to discontinue supplying raw materials or manufacturing one or more components or subassemblies essential to our products, which may be difficult, time-consuming, or costly to replace. In certain instances, we may choose to purchase large quantities of the raw materials, components, or subassemblies being discontinued as part of a last- time buy strategy. For example, we have periodically made last-time purchases in excess of our short-term needs, which are included in inventory for consumer products. For OCC products, long life-cycles periodically necessitate last-time buys of raw materials that may beand used over the coursea period of several years. We routinely review inventory for usage potential, including fulfillment of customer warranty obligations and spare part requirements, and we write down to the lower of cost or market value the excess and obsolete inventory, which may have an adverse effect on our results of operations.


15

Table of Contents

From time to time, we or our competitors may announce new products, capabilities, or technologies that may replace or shorten the life cycles of our products or cause customers to defer or stop purchasing our products until new products become available. Additionally, the announcement of new products may incite customers to increase purchases of successful legacy products as part of a last timelast-time buy strategy;strategy, thereby increasing sales in the short-term while decreasing future sales by delaying consumer adoption of new products. These inherent risks of transitioning to new products increase the difficulty of accurately forecasting demand for discontinued products as well as demand and acceptance for new products. Accordingly, we must effectively manage inventory levels to have an adequate supply of the new product and avoid retention of excess legacy product; however, we must also concurrently maintain sufficient levels of older product inventory to support continued sales during the transition. Our failure to effectively manage transitions from old products to new products could result in inventory obsolescence, and/or loss of revenue and associated gross profit, which may further result in one or more material adverse effecteffects on our revenues and profitability.

Over-forecast of demand could result in higher inventories of finished products, components, and sub-assemblies. In addition, because our retail customers have pronounced seasonality, we must build inventory well in advance of the December quarter in order to stock up for the anticipated future demand.  If we are unable to sell these inventories, we would have to write off some or all of our inventories of excess products and unusable components and sub-assemblies. Conversely, if we are unable to deliver products on time to meet the market window of our retail customers, we will lose opportunities to increase revenues and profits, we may incur penalties for late delivery and we may be unable to later sell the excess inventory. 

Any of the foregoing problems could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Prices of certain raw materials, components, semiconductors, and sub-assemblies may rise depending upon global market conditions.

We have experienced volatility in costs from our suppliers, particularly in light of the price fluctuations of oil, gold, copper and other commodities, semiconductors, and other components and products in the U.S. and around the world. We expect to continue experiencing volatility, which could negatively affect our profitability or market share. Constraints in the availability of certain commodities originating from certain countries in and around the Democratic Republic of Congo or reduction of the number of suppliers that can certify that such commodities are conflict-free under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act may exacerbate this volatility. If we are unable to pass cost increases on to our customers or to achieve operating efficiencies that offset these increases, our business, financial condition, and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

We have strong competitors and expect to face additional competition in the future. If we are unable to compete effectively, our results of operations may be adversely affected.

All of the markets for our marketsproducts are intensely competitive. We could face pressure on our average selling prices, competition on sales terms and conditions, or competition with respect toand performance, technical, and feature enhancements from our competitors. Also, aggressive industry pricing practices may result in downward pressure on margins.

Currently, our single largest competitor is GN Store Nord A/S (“GN”), a Danish telecommunications conglomerate with whom we experience price competition in the businessOCC and consumer markets. Motorola is a significant competitor in the consumer headset market, primarily in the mobile Bluetooth market, and has a brand name that is very well known and supported with significant marketing investments. Motorola also benefits from the ability to bundle other offerings with its headsets. We are also experiencing competition from other consumer electronics companies that currently manufacture and sell mobile phones or computer peripheral equipment. These competitors generally are larger, offer broader product lines, bundle or integrate with other products' communications headset topsdevices and basesadapters manufactured by them or others, offer products containing bases that are incompatible with our headset tops, and have substantially greater financial, marketing, and other resources.


15

Table of Contents

Competitors in audio devices vary by product line.  The most competitive product line is headsets for cell phones where we compete with GN's Jabra brand, Motorola, Nokia,Samsung, Aliph's Jawbone brand, BlueAnt Wireless, Samsung, GN's Jabra brand,Nokia, Bose, and Sony Ericsson, among many others.others.  Many of these competitors have substantially greater resources than us, and each of them has established market positions in this business. In the UC and office and contact center markets, the largest competitors are GN, LogitechSennheiser Communications, VXI and Sennheiser Communications.Logitech. For the entertainment and computer audio market, our primary competitors are LogitechSennheiser and Sennheiser.Logitech.  Our product markets are intensely competitive, and market leadership changes frequently as a result of new products, designs, and pricing.  We are facing additional competition from companies, principally located in the Asia Pacific region, which offer very low cost headset products including products that are modeled on or are direct copies of our products. These new competitors are offeringoffer very low cost products, which resultresults in pricing pressure in the market. If market prices are substantially reduced by new entrants into the headset market, our business, financial condition, or results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

If we do not distinguish our products, particularly our retail products, through distinctive, technologically advanced features and design, as well as continue to build and strengthen our brand recognition, our products may become commoditized and our business could be harmed.  If we do not otherwise compete effectively, demand for our products could decline, our revenues and gross margins could decrease, we could lose market share, and our earnings could decline.

We also compete in the consumer market for the sale of our mobile, entertainment, gaming and computer audio, and Clarity products.  The consumer market is highly competitive, characterized by relatively rapid product obsolescence, and we are at risk if we do not have the right products available at the right time to meet consumer needs.  In addition, some of our competitors have significant brand recognition, thereby creating barriers to entry or making market share increases difficult and costly. Moreover, we are experiencingsometimes experience more price-based competition whichthat can result in significant losses and excess inventory.


16

Table of Contents

If we are unable to stimulate growth in our business or if our costsexpenditures to stimulate demand do not generate incremental profit, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows could suffer.  In addition, failure to effectively market our products to customers could lead to lower and more volatile revenue and earnings, excess inventory, and the inability to recover the associated development costs, any of which could also have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Prices of certain raw materials, components, semiconductors and sub-assemblies may rise depending upon global market conditions.

We have experienced volatility in costs from our suppliers, particularly in light of the price fluctuations of oil, gold, copper and other commodities, semiconductors and other components and products in the U.S. and around the world. We may continue to experience volatility, which could negatively affect our profitability or market share. If we are unable to pass cost increases on to our customers or to achieve operating efficiencies that offset these increases, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

We depend on original design manufacturers and contract manufacturers who may not have adequate capacity to fulfill our needs or may not meet our quality and delivery objectives, which could have an adverse effect on our business.

Original design manufacturers and contract manufacturers produce key portions of our product lines, for us, including, for example, GoerTek, Inc., which manufacturers the majority of our mono Bluetooth products. Our reliance on these original design manufacturers and contract manufacturers involves significant risks, including reduced control over quality and logistics management, the potential lack of adequate capacity and timely deliveries, and unanticipated or inconveniently timed loss of services.services, and reduced flexibility to respond to changes specific to us or our industry. Financial instability of our manufacturers or contractors resulting from the global recession or otherwise could result in our having to find or transition manufacturing to new suppliers, which could increase our costs and delay our product deliveries. These manufacturers and contractors may also choose to discontinue manufacturing our products for a variety of reasons. Consequently, if one or more original design manufacturers or contract manufacturers is unable or unwilling to meet our demand, delivery, or price requirements, our business and operating results in all or a portion of our product lines could be severely and materially affected in the event it is difficult, costly, or time-consuming to identify and ramp-up alternative manufacturers.


16

Table of Contents

Our consumer business is volatile and failure to compete successfully in this business may have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

Our consumer business, which consists primarily of Bluetooth headsets, entertainment (stereo) and gaming and computer and gamingaudio headsets, is highly competitive and presents many significant manufacturing, marketing and operational risks and uncertainties. The risks include the following:




the
The global market for mono Bluetooth headsets appears to be shrinking as evidenced by continuing declines in retail sales in the U.S., at least partially attributable to increasing integration of Bluetooth systems into automobiles;Bluetooth headsets is shrinking, which is at least partially attributable to increasing integration of Bluetooth systems into automobiles. The market for stereo Bluetooth headsets is growing rapidly, although it is dominated by lifestyle brands. Our market share has been and is significantly larger in the mono market than in the stereo market and it remains unclear whether we will be able to sufficiently increase share in the stereo market in order to continue growing in the overall market for Bluetooth headsets, which may be particularly difficult considering we do not offer a lifestyle brand.




reductions
Reductions in the number of key suppliers participating in the Bluetooth market, thereby reducing our sourcing options and potentially increasing our costs at a time when our ability to offset higher costs with corresponding product price increases is limited;Bluetooth market, thereby reducing our sourcing options and potentially increasing our costs at a time when our ability to offset higher costs with corresponding product price increases is limited.




difficulties
Difficulties retaining or obtaining shelf space and maintaining a robust and compelling eCommerce presence for consumer products in our sales channel, particularly with large "brick and mortar" retailers and Internet "etailers" as the market for mono Bluetooth headsets continues to contract;Bluetooth headsets continues to contract.




the varying pace and scale of global economic recovery creates uncertainty and unpredictability about the demand for consumer products;
The varying pace and scale of global economic recovery creates uncertainty and unpredictability about the demand for consumer products.




our ability to forecast trends and thereafter timely meet the market windows for consumer products, particularly as it relates to our dependence on third parties to supply key components, many of which have longer lead times than commitments from some of our customers;
Our ability to forecast global trends and thereafter timely meet the market windows for consumer products, particularly as it relates to our dependence on third parties to supply key components, many of which have longer lead times than commitments from some of our customers.




difficulties achieving or maintaining sufficient gross margin and uncertainties in the forecasting of demand for the variety of Bluetooth headsets, computer and gaming headsets and new products generally within this category for which relevant data is incomplete or unavailable;
Our ability to maintain insight into, and quickly respond to, sudden changes in laws or regulations before our competitors.



our focus on UC products may weaken our competitive position; and




competition may increase more than we expect and result in product pricing pressures.
Difficulties achieving or maintaining sufficient gross margin and uncertainties in the forecasting of demand for the variety of Bluetooth headsets, entertainment, gaming and computer audio headsets, and new products generally within this category for which relevant data is incomplete or unavailable.

Competition may increase more than we expect and result in product pricing pressures.

Failure to compete successfully in the consumer business market may have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.


17

Table of Contents

We are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, which may adversely affect our revenues, gross profit, and profitability.

Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates impact our revenues and profitability because we report our financial statements in USD, whereas a significant portion of our sales to customers are transacted in other currencies, particularly the Euro and the GBP. Furthermore, fluctuations in foreign currency rates impact our global pricing strategy, resulting in our lowering or raising selling prices in one or more currencies in order to avoid disparity with USD prices and to respond to currency-driven competitive pricing actions. Large or frequent fluctuations in foreign currency rates, coupled with the ease of identifying global price differences for our products via the Internet, increase the likelihood of unauthorized third party sales in varying countries, thereby undermining our established sales channels and operations. We also have significant manufacturing operations in Mexico and fluctuations in the Mexican Peso exchange rate can impact our gross profit and profitability. Additionally, the majority of our suppliers are located internationally, principally in Asia. Accordingly, volatile or sustained increases or decreases in exchange rates of Asian currencies may result in increased costs or reductions in the number of suppliers qualified to meet our standards.

Currency exchange rates are volatile, and although we hedge those exposures we deem material, changes in exchange rates may nonetheless still have a negative impact on our financial results. Among the factors that may affect currency values are trade balances, the level of short-term interest rates, differences in relative values of similar assets in different currencies, long-term opportunities for investment and capital appreciation, and political developments.

We hedge a portion of our Euro and GBP forecasted revenue exposures for the future, typically over 12-month periods. In addition, we hedge a portion of our Mexican Peso forecasted cost of revenues and we have foreign currency forward contracts denominated in Euros, GBP, and Australian Dollars that hedge against a portion of our foreign-currency denominated assets and liabilities. Our foreign currency hedging contracts reduce, but do not eliminate, the impact of currency exchange rate movements and we do not execute hedging contracts in all currencies in which we conduct business. We can offer no assurance that such hedging strategies will be effective. Additionally, even if our hedging techniques are successful in the periods during which the rates are hedged, our future revenues, gross profit, and profitability may be negatively affected both at current rates and by adverse fluctuations in currencies against the USD.

Our business will be materially adversely affected if we are unable to develop, manufacture, and market new products in response to changing customer requirements and new technologies.

The market for our products is characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards, short product life cycles, and frequent new product introductions.introductions by us and our competitors and partners, including mobile phone and software application developers. As a result, we must continually introduce new products and technologies and enhance or adapt existing products to work with a wider variety of new and existing devices and applications in order to maintain customer satisfaction and remain competitive.

The technology used in our products is evolving more rapidly now than it has historically,in the past and we anticipate that this trend will continue. Historically, the technology used in lightweight communications headsets evolved slowly. Newnew products primarily offered stylistic changes and quality improvements rather than significant new technologies. Our increasing reliance and focus on the UC market has resulted in a growing portion of our products that integrate significantcomplex, state-of-the-art technology, increasing the risks associated with new technology.product ramp-up, including product performance and defects in the early stages of production. In addition, our increasing participation in the consumer market requires us to rapidly and frequently adopt new technology and changing market trends; thus, our consumer products experience shorter lifecycles. We believe this is particularly true for our newer emerging technology products in the mobile, entertainment, gaming and computer audio, residential, and certain parts of the office markets.  In particular, we anticipate a trend towards more integrated solutions that combine audio, video, and software functionality, while historically our focus was limited to audio products.

Office phones have begun to incorporate Bluetooth functionality, which has opened the market to consumer Bluetooth headsets and reduced the demand for our traditional office telephony headsets and adapters as well as impacting potential revenues from our own wired and wireless headset systems, resulting in lost revenue, lower margins, or both. ShouldMoreover, the increasing adoption of wireless headsets has also resulted in increased development costs associated with the introduction of new wireless standards and more frequent changes in those standards and capabilities as compared to wired technologies. If sales and margins on our traditional corded and cordless products decline and we are unable to successfully design, develop, and market alternatives at historically comparable margins, our revenue and profits may decrease.

In addition, innovative technologies such as UC have moved the platform for certain of our products from our customers' closed proprietary systems to open platforms such as the PC. In turn, the PC has become more open as a result of technologies such as cloud computing and trends toward more open source software code development. As a result, we are exposed to the risk that current and potential competitors could enter our markets and commoditize our products by offering similar products.products has increased.


1718

Table of Contents

The success of our products depends on several factors, including our ability to:




anticipate technology and market trends;



develop innovative new products and enhancements on a timely basis;



distinguish our products from those of our competitors;



create industrial designs that appeal to our customers and end-users;



manufacture and deliver high-quality products in sufficient volumes and acceptable margins; and



price our products competitively.
Anticipate technology and market trends
Develop innovative new products and enhancements on a timely basis
Distinguish our products from those of our competitors
Create industrial designs that appeal to our customers and end-users
Manufacture and deliver high-quality products in sufficient volumes and acceptable margins
Price our products competitively
Hire and retain qualified personnel in the highly competitive field of software development for future generations of our products
Provide timely, effective and accurate technical product support to our customers
Leverage new and existing channel partners effectively

If we are unable to develop, manufacture, market, and introduce enhanced or new products in a timely manner in response to changing market conditions or customer requirements, including changing fashion trends and styles, it will materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.  Furthermore, as we develop new generations of products more quickly, we expect that the pace of product obsolescence will increase concurrently.  The disposition of inventories of excess or obsolete products may result in reductions to our operating margins and materially adversely affect our earnings and results of operations.

We have significant foreign manufacturing operations and rely on third party manufacturers located outside the United States,U.S., and a significant amount of our revenues are generated internationally, which subjects our business to risks of international operations.

We have a manufacturing facility in Tijuana, Mexico. We also have suppliers and other vendors throughout Asia, including GoerTek, Inc., located in Weifang, China, which is the manufacturer of the majority of our Bluetooth products. We also generate a significant amount of our revenues from foreign customers.

The types of risks faced in connection withOur international operations and sales include,expose us to various risks including, among others:




fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates;



cultural differences in the conduct of business;



greater difficulty in accounts receivable collection and longer collection periods;



the impact of recessionary, volatile or adverse global economic conditions;



reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some countries;



unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;



tariffs and other trade barriers;



political conditions, health epidemics, civil unrest or criminal activities within each country;



the management and operation of an enterprise spread over various countries;



the burden and administrative costs of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws and regulations;



currency restrictions; and



compliance with anti-bribery laws, including, without limitation, compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom's Bribery Act.
Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates
Cultural differences in the conduct of business
Greater difficulty in accounts receivable collection and longer collection periods
The impact of recessionary, volatile or adverse global economic conditions
Reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some countries
Unexpected changes in regulatory requirements
Tariffs and other trade barriers, particularly in developing nations such as Brazil, India, and others
Political conditions, health epidemics, civil unrest, or criminal activities within each country
The management, operation, and expenses associated with an enterprise spread over various countries
The burden and administrative costs of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws and regulations
Currency restrictions
Compliance with anti-bribery laws, including the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom's Bribery Act

The above-listed and other inherent risks of international operations could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates which may adversely affect our revenues, gross profit, and profitability.

Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates impact our revenues and profitability because we report our financial statements in USD, whereas a significant portion of our sales to customers are transacted in other currencies, particularly the Euro and the GBP. Furthermore, fluctuations in foreign currency rates impact our global pricing strategy resulting in our lowering or raising selling prices in one or more currencies in order to avoid disparity with USD prices and to respond to currency-driven competitive pricing actions. We also have significant manufacturing operations in Mexico and fluctuations in the Mexican Peso exchange rate can impact our gross profit and profitability. Additionally, a large majority of our suppliers are located internationally, principally in Asia. Accordingly, volatile or sustained increases or decreases in exchange rates of Asian currencies may result in increased costs or reductions in the number of qualified suppliers.

Currency exchange rates are volatile, and while we hedge our major exposures, changes in exchange rates in the future may still have a negative impact on our financial results. Among the factors that may affect currency values are trade balances, the level of short-term interest rates, differences in relative values of similar assets in different currencies, long-term opportunities for investment and capital appreciation, and political developments.


1819

Table of Contents

We hedge a portion of our Euro and GBP forecasted revenue exposures for the future 12 month period. In addition, we hedge a portion of our Mexican Peso forecasted cost of revenues. Although we have employed these hedging techniques to minimize these risks, we can offer no assurance that such strategies will be effective. If the Euro and GBP fall against the USD, our revenues, gross profit and profitability in the future could be negatively affected.

We also have foreign currency forward contracts denominated in Euros, GBP and Australian Dollars which hedge against a portion of our foreign-currency denominated assets and liabilities. Our foreign currency forward contracts reduce, but do not eliminate, the impact of currency exchange rate movements. For example, we do not execute forward contracts in all currencies in which we conduct business.

We sell our products through various distribution channels of distribution that can be volatile, and failure to establish and maintain successful relationships with our channel partners could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations. In addition, bankruptcies or financial difficulties of our customers may impact our business.

We sell substantially all of our products to end users through distributors, retailers, OEMs, and telephony service providers. Effectively managing these relationships and avoiding channel conflicts can be difficult and time-consuming. Our existing relationships with these parties are generally not exclusive and can be terminated by us or them without cause.cause on short notice. In the future, we may not be ableunable to retain or attract a sufficient number of qualified distributors, retailers, OEMs, and telephony service providers. These customers also sell or may sell products offered by our competitors. To the extent that our competitors offer these customers more favorable terms or more compelling products, such customers may decline to carry, de-emphasize, or discontinue carrying our products. Further, such customers may not recommend or may stop recommending our products. In the future, our OEMs or potential OEMs may elect to manufacture their own products that are similar to those we currently sell to them. The inability to establish or maintain successful relationships with distributors, OEMs, retailers, and telephony service providers or to expand our distribution channels could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations. We have experienced the bankruptcy of certain customers; for example, in fiscal year 2012, the bankruptcy of one of our customers negatively impacted our operating income by $1.2 million. If global or regional economic conditions deteriorate, more of our customers or suppliers may become insolvent. It is not possibleimpossible to predictreliably determine whether additional bankruptcies may occur.

As a result of the evolution of our consumer business, our customer mix is changing, and certain retailers, OEMs, and wireless carriers are more significant.  This reliance on certain large channel partners could increase the volatility of our revenues and earnings. In particular, we have several large customers whose order patterns are difficult to predict. Offers and promotions by these customers may result in significant fluctuations of their purchasing activities over time.  If we are unable to correctly anticipate the quantities and timing of the purchase requirements of these customers, our revenues may be adversely affected, or we may be exposed to large volumes of inventory that cannot be resold to other customers.
 
Our corporate tax rate may increase or we may incur additional income tax liabilities, which could adversely impact our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations.

We have significant operations in various tax jurisdictions throughout the world, and a substantial portion of our taxable income has been generated historically in jurisdictions outside of the U.S. Currently, some of our operations are taxed at rates substantially lower than U.S. tax rates. If our income in these lower tax jurisdictions were no longer to qualify for these lower tax rates, the applicable tax laws were rescinded or changed, or the mix of our earnings shifts from lower rate jurisdictions to higher rate jurisdictions, our operating results could be materially adversely affected. In addition, various governmental tax authorities have recently increased their scrutiny of tax strategies employed by corporations and individuals. If U.S. or other foreign tax authorities change applicable tax laws or successfully challenge the manner in which our profits are currently recognized, our overall taxes could increase, and our business, cash flow, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Our Board of Directors has authorizedWe are also subject to examination by the repurchase of sharesInternal Revenue Service ("IRS") and other tax authorities, including state revenue agencies and foreign governments. In July 2012, the IRS commenced an examination of our common stock2010 tax year. While we regularly assess the likelihood of favorable or unfavorable outcomes resulting from examinations by the IRS and other tax authorities to enhance stockholder value and may do so again indetermine the future. Stock repurchases may not result in enhanced stockholder value, may not prove to be the best useadequacy of our cash resources and may require us to draw additional funds on our existing credit agreement.

On March 8, 2012, we announced the completion of a 7,000,000 share repurchase program initially authorized by our Board of Directors in May 2011. We further announced that our Board of Directors had authorized an additional 1,000,000 share repurchase program. Thereprovision for income taxes, there can be no assurance that the actual outcome resulting from these examinations will not materially adversely affect our stock repurchase programs will have a beneficial impact on our stock price or if our Boardfinancial condition and results of Directors will authorize additional stock repurchase programs in the future. Additionally, the timing of our stock repurchases varies with fluctuations in the trading price of our common stock such that at any particular time our domestic cash flow from operations has been, and may be again in the future, insufficient to fully cover our stock repurchases and support our working capital needs. In May 2011 we entered into a credit agreement (“Credit Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association which provides for a $100 million unsecured revolving credit facility. We have previously drawn funds and expect to continue drawing funds under the Credit Agreement from time to time, which amounts bear interest. Moreover, the Credit Agreement contains affirmative and negative covenants with which we must comply. These restrictions apply regardless of whether any loans are outstanding and could adversely impact how we operate our business.operations.


1920

Table of Contents

We are subject to environmental laws and regulations that expose us to a number of risks and could result in significant liabilities and costs.

There are multiple initiatives in several jurisdictions regarding the removal of certain potential environmentally sensitive materials from our products to comply with the European Union (“EU”) and other Directives on the Restrictions of the use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment (“RoHS”) and on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (“WEEE”).  In certain jurisdictions, the RoHS legislation was enacted as of July 1, 2006; however, other jurisdictions have delayed implementation. If unusual occurrences arise or we are wrong in our assessment of what it will take to fully comply with the RoHS and WEEE directives, there is a risk that we will not be able to comply with the legislation as passed by the EU member states or other global jurisdictions. Moreover, if additional new or existing environmental laws or regulations in the U.S., Europe or other jurisdictions are enacted or amended, we may be required to modify some or all of our products or replace one or more components in those products which, if such modifications are possible, may be time-consuming, expensive to implement and decrease end-user demand as result of increased price. If any of the foregoing were to happen, our ability to sell one or more of our products may be limited or prohibited causing a material negative effect on our financial results.

We are subject to various federal, state, local, and foreign environmental laws and regulations on a global basis, including those governing the use, discharge, and disposal of hazardous substances in the ordinary course of our manufacturing process. Although we believe that our current manufacturing operations comply in all material respects with applicable environmental laws and regulations, it is possible that future environmental legislation may be enacted or current environmental legislation may be interpreted in any given country to create environmental liability with respect to our facilities, operations, or products.  To the extent that we incur claims for environmental matters exceeding reserves or insurance for environmental liability, our operating results could be negatively impacted.

Our intellectual property rights could be infringed on by others, and we may infringe on the intellectual property rights of others resulting in claims or lawsuits. Even if we prevail, claims and lawsuits are costly and time consuming to pursue or defend and may divert management's time from our business.

Our success depends in part on our ability to protect our copyrights, patents, trademarks, trade dress, trade secrets, and other intellectual property, including our rights to certain domain names. We rely primarily on a combination of nondisclosure agreements and other contractual provisions as well as patent, trademark, trade secret, and copyright laws to protect our proprietary rights. Effective trademark, patent, copyright, and trade secret protection may not be available in every country in which our products and media properties are distributed to customers. The process of seeking intellectual property protection can be lengthy, expensive, and expensive. Patentsuncertain. For example, patents may not be issued in response to our applications, and any patents that may be issued may be invalidated, circumvented, or challenged by others. If we are required to enforce our intellectual property or other proprietary rights through litigation, the costs and diversion of management's attention could be substantial. Furthermore, we may be countersued by an actual or alleged infringer if we attempt to enforce our intellectual property rights, which may materially increase our costs, divert management attention, and result in injunctive or financial damages being awarded against us. In addition, the rights granted under any intellectual property may not provide us competitive advantages or be adequate to safeguard and maintain our proprietary rights. Moreover, the laws of certain countries do not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as do the laws of the U.S. If we doit is not feasible or possible to obtain, enforce, andor protect our intellectual property rights, it could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets are owned by individuals or entities that may make claims or commence litigation based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. As we have grown, the intellectual property rights claims against us have increased. There has also been a general trend of increasing intellectual property infringement claims against corporations that make and sell products. Our products and technologies may be subject to certain third-party claims and, regardless of the merits of the claim, intellectual property claims are often time-consuming and expensive to litigate, settle, or otherwise resolve. In addition, to the extent claims against us are successful, we may have to pay substantial monetary damages or discontinue the manufacture and distribution of products that are found to be in violation of another party's rights. We also may have to obtain, or renew on less favorable terms, licenses to manufacture and distribute our products, which may significantly increase our operating expenses. In addition, many of our agreements with our distributors and resellers require us to indemnify them for certain third-party intellectual property infringement claims. Discharging our indemnity obligations may involve time-consuming and expensive litigation and result in substantial settlements or damages awards, our products being enjoined, and the loss of a distribution channel or retail partner, any of which may have a material adverse impact on our operating results.

We are subject to environmental laws and regulations that expose us to a number of risks and could result in significant liabilities and costs.

There are multiple initiatives in several jurisdictions regarding the removal of certain potential environmentally sensitive materials from our products to comply with the European Union (“EU”) and other Directives on the Restrictions of the use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment (“RoHS”) and on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (“WEEE”).  If it is determined that our products do not comply with RoHs or WEEE, or additional new or existing environmental laws or regulations in the U.S., Europe, or other jurisdictions are enacted or amended, we may be required to modify some or all of our products or replace one or more components in those products, which, if such modifications are possible, may be time-consuming, expensive to implement and decrease end-user demand, particularly if we increase prices to offset higher costs. If any of the foregoing were to happen, our ability to sell one or more of our products may be limited or prohibited causing a material negative effect on our financial results.

We are subject to various federal, state, local, and foreign environmental laws and regulations on a global basis, including those governing the use, discharge, and disposal of hazardous substances in the ordinary course of our manufacturing process. Although we believe that our current manufacturing operations comply in all material respects with applicable environmental laws and regulations, it is possible that future environmental legislation may be enacted or current environmental legislation may be interpreted in any given country to create environmental liability with respect to our facilities, operations, or products.  To the extent that we incur claims for environmental matters exceeding reserves or insurance for environmental liability, our operating results could be negatively impacted.

We cannot guarantee we will continue to repurchase our common stock pursuant to stock repurchase programs or that we will declare future dividend payments at historic rates or at all. The repurchase of our common stock and the payment of dividends may not achieve our desires or may result in negative side effects.

Since May 2011, we have repurchased in excess of 8 million shares of our common stock through multiple share repurchase programs authorized by our Board of Directors. In addition, we continue to operate under a 1,000,000 share repurchase program approved in August 2012. Moreover, our Board of Directors has declared quarterly dividends of $.10 per share since May 2012 and $0.05 per share over a number of years prior to May 2012.

2021

Table of Contents

Our products
Although our Board of Directors has consistently declared quarterly cash dividend payments on our common stock and has authorized the repurchase of shares of our common stock under share repurchase programs with more frequency in recent years, any determination to pay cash dividends at recent rates or at all, or any authorization to repurchase shares of our common stock under share repurchase programs will be assessed based on a variety of factors, including our financial condition, results of operations, business requirements, and our Board of Directors' continuing determination that such dividends or share repurchases are in the best interests of our stockholders and are in compliance with all laws and applicable agreements. Additionally, there can be no assurance that the quantities of stock repurchased under our stock repurchase programs will continue at recent historical levels or at all, or that our stock repurchase programs or dividend declarations will have a beneficial impact on our stock price. The timing of our stock repurchases varies with fluctuations in the trading price of our common stock such that at any particular time, our domestic cash flow from operations has been, and may be again in the future, insufficient to fully cover our stock repurchases and support our working capital needs, causing us to borrow to support our repurchase or other activities. Although we currently have sufficient reserves in our international locations to fund our existing and any future stock repurchase programs, repatriating all or a portion of our foreign cash would likely result in material tax obligations.

To improve our domestic liquidity in connection with further stock repurchases and other business activities, in May 2011, we entered into a credit agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association ("the Bank"), as most recently amended in May 2013 to extend its term to May 2016 ("the Credit Agreement"). The Credit Agreement provides for a $100 million unsecured revolving credit facility. We have previously drawn funds and expect to continue drawing funds under the Credit Agreement from time to time, which amounts bear interest. Moreover, the Credit Agreement contains affirmative and negative covenants with which we must comply. These restrictions apply regardless of whether any loans are outstanding and could adversely impact how we operate our business, our operating results, and dividend declarations, which, in turn, may negatively impact our stock price. In addition, as we borrow additional funds on the credit facility under the Credit Agreement, we may be required to increase the borrowing limit under the Credit Agreement or seek additional sources of credit. Given tightening credit markets, there is no assurance that if we were to seek additional credit, it would be available to us when needed or if it is available, the cost or restrictive terms and conditions accompanying additional loans would not be prohibitive.

We are subject to various regulatory requirements, and changes in such regulatory requirements and increases in the number and types of products using limited radio frequencies for wireless products may adversely impact our gross margins as we comply with such changes, or reduce our ability to generate revenues if we are unable to comply.comply, or decrease demand for our wireless products if increased radio frequency interference reduces the actual or perceived quality of those products.

Our products must meet the requirements set by regulatory authorities in the numerous jurisdictions in which we sell them. For example, certain of our office and contact centerOCC products must meet certain standards to work with local phone systems. Certain of our wireless office and mobile products must work within existing frequency ranges permitted in various jurisdictions. Moreover, competition for limited radio frequency bandwidth as a result of an increasing number of wireless products by us, our competitors, and other third party product manufacturers increases the risk of interference or diminished product performance. In particular, there is an effort by a third party manufacturer of wireless devices to release a product in the U.S. that operates in the unlicensed 903-928 megahertz radio frequency range using significantly higher power than the power used by our wireless products and those of many other users in the unlicensed radio frequency range. If use of this product is approved by the Federal Communications Commission, we anticipate our wireless products will experience interference which, if material, will harm our reputation and adversely affect sales of our wireless products.

As regulations and local laws change and competition for limited bandwidth on various radio frequencies increases, we must modify our products to address those changes. Regulatory restrictions and competition may increase the costs to design, manufacture, and sell our products, resulting in a decrease in our margins or a decrease in demand for our products if the costs are passed along. Compliance with regulatory restrictions and bandwidth limitations may impact the actual or perceived technical quality and capabilities of our products, reducing their marketability. IfIn addition, if the products we do notsupply to various jurisdictions or which are conveyed by customers or merchants into unauthorized jurisdictions fail to comply with thesethe applicable local or regional regulations, our products might interfere with other devices that properly use the frequency ranges in which our products operate, and we or consumers purchasing our products may be responsible for the damages that our products cause. This could result in our having to alter the performance of our products, and make payment ofpay substantial monetary damages or penalties.penalties, harm to our reputation, or other adverse consequences.

We are exposed to potential lawsuits alleging defects in our products and/or other claims related to the use of our products.

The sales of our products expose us to the risk of product liability, including hearing loss claims. These claims have in the past been, and are currently being, asserted against us. None of the previously resolved claims have materially affected our business, financial condition, or results of operations, nor do we believe that any of the pending claims will have such an effect. Although we maintain product liability insurance, the coverage provided under our policies could be unavailable or insufficient to cover the full amount ofNevertheless, there is no guarantee that any one or more claims. Therefore, successful product liability or hearing losssuch claims brought against us could have a material adverse effect uponmay materially negatively impact our business financial condition, and resultsor result in substantial damages, or both, in the future.

22

Table of operations.Contents


For example,Additionally, our mobile headsets are used with mobile telephones and there has been continuing public controversy over whether the radio frequency emissions from mobile phones are harmful to users of mobile phones. We are unaware of any conclusive proof of any health hazard from the use of mobile phones, but research in this area continues. Although weWe have tested our headsets through independent laboratories and have found that use of our corded headsets reduces radio frequency emissions at the user's head to virtually zero and our Bluetooth and other wireless headsets emit significantly less powerful radio frequency emissions than mobile phones; however, if research establishes a health hazard from the use of mobile phones or public controversy grows even in the absence of conclusive research findings, the likelihood of litigation against us may increase.  Likewise, should research establish a link between radio frequency emissions and corded or wireless headsets or should we become a party to litigation claiming such a link and public concern in this area grows, demand for our corded or wireless headsets could be reduced creating a material adverse effect on our financial results.

There is also continuing and increasing public controversy over the use of mobile phones by operators of motor vehicles. While we believe that our products enhance driver safety by permitting a motor vehicle operator to generally keep both hands free to operate the vehicle, there is no certainty that this is the case, and we may be subject to claims arising from allegations that use of a mobile phone and headset contributed to a motor vehicle accident.

We maintain product liability insurance and general liability insurance that we believe would cover any such claims;claims, including those described above; however, the coverage provided under our policies could be unavailable or insufficient to cover the full amount of any one or more claims. Therefore, successful product liability claims brought against us could have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition, and results of operations.


21

Table of Contents

Our stock price may be volatile and the value of an investment in Plantronics stock could be diminished.

The market price for our common stock has been affected and may continue to be affected by a number of factors, including:




uncertain economic conditions, including the length and scope of the recovery from the domestic and global recession or double dip recession in the U.S. or Europe, slowing economic growth in Asia, inflationary pressures, and a potential decline in investor confidence in the market place;



failure to meet our forecasts or the expectations and forecasts of securities analysts;



changes in our published forecasts of future results of operations;



quarterly variations in our or our competitors' results of operations and changes in market share;



the announcement of new products or product enhancements by us or our competitors;



our ability to develop, introduce, ship and support new products and product enhancements and manage product transitions;



repurchases of our common shares under our repurchase plans;



our decision to declare dividends or increase or decrease dividends over historical rates;



the loss of services of one or more of our executive officers or other key employees;



changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by securities analysts;



developments in our industry;



sales of substantial numbers of shares of our common stock in the public market;



general economic, political, and market conditions, including market volatility; and



other factors unrelated to our operating performance or the operating performance of our competitors.
Uncertain economic conditions, including the length and scope of the recovery from the domestic and global recession or double dip recession in the U.S. or Europe, slowing economic growth in Asia, inflationary pressures, and a potential decline in investor confidence in the market place
Failure to meet our forecasts or the expectations and forecasts of securities analysts
Changes in our published forecasts of future results of operations
Quarterly variations in our or our competitors' results of operations and changes in market share
The announcement of new products, product enhancements, or partnerships by us or our competitors
Our ability to develop, introduce, ship, and support new products and product enhancements and manage product transitions
Repurchases of our common shares under our repurchase plans
Our decision to declare dividends or increase or decrease dividends over historical rates
The loss of services of one or more of our executive officers or other key employees
Changes in earnings estimates, recommendations, or ratings by securities analysts or a reduction in the number of analysts following our stock
Developments in our industry, including new or increased enforcement of existing governmental regulations related to our products and new or revised communications standards
Concentrated ownership of our common stock by a limited number of institutional investors that may limit liquidity for investors interested in acquiring or selling positions in our common stock, particularly substantial positions
Sales of substantial numbers of shares of our common stock in the public market by us, our officers or directors, or unaffiliated third parties, including institutional investors
General economic, political, and market conditions, including market volatility
Litigation brought by or against us
Other factors unrelated to our operating performance or the operating performance of our competitors

Our business could be materially adversely affected if we lose the benefit of the services of key personnel.

Our success depends to a large extent upon the services of a limited number of executive officers and other key employees. The unanticipated loss of the services of one or more of our executive officers or key employees could have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition, and results of operations. For example, on April 14, 2013, we announced that our President and CEO, Ken Kannappan, was taking a temporary medical leave of absence to address a treatable form of cancer. His leave is currently expected to last approximately four months. In the interim, our Board of Directors has named our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Pam Strayer, as Acting Interim Chief Executive Officer. Should Mr. Kannappan's leave be extended or if his absence is perceived by investors and analysts as materially negative for any reason, they may sell our stock or enact other strategies that may cause our stock price to decline.


23

Table of Contents

We also believe that our future success will depend in large part upon our ability to attract and retain additional highly skilled technical, management, sales, and marketing personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense. We may not be successful in attracting and retaining such personnel, and our failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, or financial condition.

Our purchase of property and a facility in Tijuana, Mexico, the expansion of the facilities to meet our operating needs, and the transfer of certain responsibilities to Tijuana could affect our operating results.

In June 2012, we announced the purchase of property and an existing building in Tijuana, Mexico. We are in the process of modifying and expanding the building by approximately one-third and intend to move all of our Tijuana operations, currently divided into four leased buildings in Tijuana, into the new facility after completion of construction, estimated to be in July 2013. We currently expect that, when completed, the cost of the property and building, along with the modifications and expansion of the existing building, will approximate $31 million, an increase of $1 million over prior estimates. Construction projects of this size and scope are complex and prone to cost overruns, unexpected contingencies, and delays in obtaining construction and governmental permits. As part of the expansion process, we are also concurrently consolidating a portion of our worldwide operations by transferring some responsibilities to Tijuana. Our failure or inability to oversee and manage the construction, operations, and costs of our facilities in Tijuana, any delays in the construction or transition of operations into the new facility, or issues arising with the transfer of responsibilities to Tijuana, could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

We have $14.4$16.4 million of goodwill and other intangible assets recorded on our balance sheet.  If the carrying value of our goodwill were to exceed its implied fair value, or if the carrying value of intangible assets iswere not recoverable, an impairment loss may be recognized, which would adversely affect our financial results.

As a result of past acquisitions, including an immaterial acquisition in the quarter ended September 30, 2012, we have $14.4$16.4 millionof goodwill and other intangible assets on our consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2012.2013.  It is not possibleimpossible at this time to determine if any future impairment charge would result or, if it does, whether such charge would be material related to these remaining assets.assets would be material. If such a charge is necessary, it may have a material adverse effect our financial results.

If we are unable to protect our information systems against service interruption, misappropriation of data or breaches of security, our operations could be disrupted, our reputation may be damaged, and we may be financially liable for damages.

We rely on networks, information systems, and other technology (“information systems”), including the Internet and third-party hosted services, to support a variety of business activities, including procurement, manufacturing, sales, distribution, invoicing, and collections. We use information systems to process and report financial information internally and to comply with regulatory reporting. In addition, we depend on information systems for communications with our suppliers, distributors, and customers. Consequently, our business may be impacted by system shutdowns or service disruptions during routine operations, such as system upgrades or user errors, as well as network or hardware failures, malicious software, hackers, natural disasters, communications interruptions, or other events. Such events (collectively, "network incidents"). Our computer systems have been, and will likely continue to be, subject to network incidents. While, to date, the Company has not experienced a network incident resulting in material impairment to our operations, nor have we experienced material intentional or inadvertent disclosure of our data or information or the information or data of our customers or vendors, future network incidents could result in unintended disruption of our operations or disclosure of sensitive information or assets. Furthermore, we may experience targeted attacks and although we continue to invest in personnel, technologies, and training to prepare for and reduce the adverse consequences of such attacks, these investments are expensive and do not guarantee that such attacks will be unsuccessful.unsuccessful, either completely or partially.

If our information systems are disrupted or shutdown and we fail to timely and effectively resolve the issues, we could experience delays in reporting our financial results and we may lose revenue and profits. Misuse, leakage, or falsification of information could result in a violation of data privacy laws and regulations, damage our reputation, and have a negative impact on net operating revenues.results. In addition, we may suffer financial damage and damage to our reputation because of loss or misappropriation of our confidential information or assets, or those of our partners, customers, or suppliers. We could also be required to spendexpend significant effort and incur financial and other resourcescosts to remedy security breaches or to repair or replace networks and information systems.


2224

Table of Contents


War, terrorism, public health issues, natural disasters, or other business interruptions could disrupt supply, delivery, or demand of products, which could negatively affect our operations and performance.

War, terrorism, public health issues, natural disasters, or other business interruptions, whether in the U.S. or abroad, have caused or could cause damage or disruption to international commerce by creating economic and political uncertainties that may have a strong negative impact on the global economy, us, and our suppliers or customers.  Our major business operations and those of many of our vendors and their sub-suppliers (collectively, "Suppliers") are subject to interruption by disasters, including, without limitation, earthquakes, floods, and volcanic eruptions or other natural or manmade disasters, fire, power shortages, terrorist attacks and other hostile acts, public health issues, flu or similar epidemics or pandemics, and other events beyond our control and the control of our Suppliers.  Our corporate headquarters, information technology, manufacturing, certain research and development activities, and other critical business operations are located near major seismic faults or flood zones.  While we are partially insured for earthquake-related losses or floods, our operating results and financial condition could be materially affected in the event of a major earthquake or other natural or manmade disaster.

Although it is impossible to predict the occurrences or consequences of any of the events described above, such events could significantly disrupt our operations or the operations of our Suppliers.  In addition, should any of the events above arise we could be negatively impacted by the need for more stringent employee travel restrictions, limitations in the availability of freight services, governmental actions limiting the movement of products between various regions, delays in production, and disruptions in the operations of our Suppliers.  Our operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected by these events.

We are required to evaluate our internal control over financial reporting under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and any adverse results from such evaluation could result in a loss of investor confidence in our financial reports and have an adverse effect on our stock price.

Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, our management is required to report on, and our independent registered public accounting firm are required to attest to,report annually on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. We have an ongoing program to perform the system and process evaluation and testing necessary to comply with these requirements.

We have and will continue to consume management resources and incur significant expenses for Section 404 compliance on an ongoing basis. In the event that our chief executive officer, chief financial officer, or independent registered public accounting firm determines in the future that our internal control over financial reporting is not effective as defined under Section 404, we may not be able to produce timely and accurate financial statements, and we may conclude that our internal control over financial reporting is not effective. If this were to occur, we could be subject to one or more investigations or enforcement actions by state or federal regulatory agencies, stockholder lawsuits, or other adverse actions requiring us to incur defense costs, pay fines, settlements or judgments, and causing investor perceptions to be adversely affected and potentially resulting in a decline in the market price of our stock.

We may still be subject to certain liabilities from our discontinued Audio Entertainment Group ("AEG") business segment.

Under the terms of an Asset Purchase Agreement, dated October 2, 2009, by and among us, certain of our subsidiaries and Audio Technologies Acquisition, LLC (the "Asset Purchase Agreement"), a First Amendment to the Asset Purchase Agreement, dated November 30, 2009, a Side Letter to the Asset Purchase Agreement, dated January 8, 2010, and a second Side Letter to the Asset Purchase Agreement, dated February 15, 2010 (collectively, the “Purchase Agreement”), we retained certain assets and liabilities of Altec Lansing as of the closing date, December 1, 2009 and may be required to indemnify the purchaser ("Purchaser") for certain losses they may incur.  If the Purchaser incurs certain losses, the Purchaser may make an indemnification claim and we may be required to pay certain expenses or reimburse Purchaser for losses they incur, which could harm our operating results.  In addition, our ability to defend ourselves may be impaired because most of our former AEG employees are employees of the Purchaser and our management may have to devote a substantial amount of time to resolving the claim, and, as we are no longer in the AEG business, we may not be able to readily offer products, service and intellectual property in settlement.  In addition, these indemnity claims may divert management attention from our continued business.  It may also be difficult to determine whether a claim from a third party stemmed from actions taken by us or the Purchaser and we may expend substantial resources trying to determine which party has responsibility for the claim.


23

Table of Contents

Provisions in our charter documents and Delaware law or a decision by our Board of Directors to adopt a stockholder rights plan in the future may delay or prevent a third party from acquiring us, which could decrease the value of our stock.

Our Board of Directors has the authority to issue preferred stock and to determine the price, rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions, including voting and conversion rights, of those shares without any further vote or action by the stockholders. The issuance of our preferred stock could have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire us. In addition, we are subject to the anti-takeover provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which could also have the effect of delaying or preventing our acquisition by a third party. Further, certain provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation and bylaws could delay or make more difficult a merger, tender offer or proxy contest, which could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Additionally, the stockholders rights plan adopted by our Board of Directors in 2002 ("Rights Plan") recently expired. Were our Board of Directors to approve the renewal of the Rights Plan or adopt a new or similar plan, the ability of one or more third parties to acquire us or a significant percentage of our capital stock would be more difficult and require any third parties to first negotiate with our Board of Directors, thereby potentially decreasing the value placed on our stock.



24

Table of Contents

ITEM 1B.  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
 
None.
 

25

Table of Contents

ITEM 2.  PROPERTIES
 
Our principal executive offices are located in Santa Cruz, California.  Our facilities are located throughout the Americas, Europe, and Asia.  The table below lists the major facilities owned or leased as of March 31, 20122013:

LocationSquare FootageLease/OwnPrimary Use
Chattanooga, Tennessee10,125OwnLight Assembly, Sales and Marketing, Engineering, Administration
Hoofddorp, Netherlands14,788LeaseAdministrative and TAC (Technical Assistance Center)
San Diego, California13,40023,368LeaseIndustrial and Office Space
Santa Cruz, California79,253OwnLight Assembly, Sales and Marketing, Engineering, Administration
Santa Cruz, California44,183OwnLight Assembly, Sales, Engineering, Administration
Santa Cruz, California39,892OwnLight Assembly, Sales, Engineering, Administration
Santa Cruz, California18,250LeaseLight Assembly, Sales, Engineering, Administration, and TAC. To be vacated at the end of May 2013 as part of a restructuring plan. Lease obligation will continue until March 2018.
Santa Cruz, California20,325LeaseLight Assembly, Sales, Engineering, Administration
Santa Cruz, California7,000LeaseLight Assembly, Sales, Engineering, Administration
Suzhou, China42,012LeaseSales, Administration, Design Center, Quality, TAC
Tijuana, Mexico792,304OwnCurrently under construction. Building is anticipated to be fully completed in July 2013 and fully operational in August 2013. All the activities in the 4 leased buildings in Tijuana, Mexico (listed below) will be consolidated in this building.
Tijuana, Mexico95,980LeaseEngineering, Assembly, AdministrationAdministration. To be vacated in July 2013 and will be restored and returned to landlord in August 2013. Lease obligation will continue until the last day of October 2013.
Tijuana, Mexico61,785LeaseEngineering, AssemblyAssembly. To be vacated in July 2013 and will be restored and returned to landlord in August 2013. Lease obligation will continue until the last day of October 2013.
Tijuana, Mexico289,589LeaseLogistic and Distribution CenterCenter. To be vacated in June 2013, and will be restored and returned to landlord in July 2013. Lease obligation will continue until the last day of April, 2014.
Tijuana, Mexico53,732LeaseEngineering, Design Center, Call Center, and TAC. To be vacated in July 2013 and will be restored and returned to landlord in August 2013. Lease obligation will continue until the last day of October 2013.
Wootton Bassett, UK21,824OwnMain Building Sales, Engineering, Administration
Wootton Bassett, UK15,970OwnCurrently leased to a third party

We believe that our existing properties are suitable and generally adequate for our current business; however, future growth may require that we obtain additional space. We are currently evaluating the purchase of a new manufacturing facility in Mexico that would replace and consolidate our existing leased facilities shown in the preceding table. If we complete the purchase in the first half of fiscal year 2013, we would expect to move into the new facility in the first quarter of fiscal year 2014.business.




2526

Table of Contents

ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

SixFive class action lawsuits have been filed against us alleging that our Bluetooth headsets may cause noise-induced hearing loss.loss are outstanding.  Shannon Wars et al. vs. Plantronics, Inc. was filed on November 14, 2006 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.  Lori Raines, et al. vs. Plantronics, Inc. was filed on October 20, 2006 in the U.S. District Court, Central District of California.  Kyle Edwards, et al vs. Plantronics, Inc. was filed on October 17, 2006 in the U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida.  Ralph Cook vs. Plantronics, Inc. was filed on February 8, 2007 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.  Randy Pierce vs. Plantronics, Inc. was filed on January 10, 2007 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.  Bruce Schiller, et al vs. Plantronics, Inc. was filed on October 10, 2006 in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Los Angeles.  The complaints state that they do not seek damages for personal injury to any individual.  These complaints seek various remedies, including injunctive relief requiring us to include certain additional warnings with our Bluetooth headsets and to redesign the headsets to limit the volume produced, or, alternatively, to provide the user with the ability to determine the level of sound emitted from the headset.  Plaintiffs also seek unspecified general, special, and punitive damages, as well as restitution.  The federal cases have been consolidated for all pre-trial purposes in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Los Angeles before Judge Fischer.Angeles.  The California State Court case was dismissed by the plaintiffs.  The parties have agreed in principle to settle theirall outstanding claims.  The U.S. District Court for the Central District of Los Angeles signed an order approving the final settlement of the lawsuit entitled In Re Bluetooth Headset Products Liability Litigation, brought against Plantronics, Inc., Motorola, Inc., and GN Netcom, Inc., alleging that the three companies failed to adequately warn consumers of the potential for long termlong-term noise induced hearing loss if they used Bluetooth headsets.  The companies contested the claims of the lawsuit, but settled the lawsuit on a nationwide basis for an amount which we believe is less than the cost of litigating and winning the lawsuit.  On September 25, 2009,lawsuit which the District Court signed a judgment in the case resolving all matters except the issue of outstanding attorneys' fees, which will be split among the three defendants.  On October 22, 2009, the Court issued an order setting the class counsel's attorneys' fees and costs and the incentive award at the maximum amounts agreed to by the parties in their settlement.  The objectorsthereafter approved.  Objectors to the settlement appealed the judgment issued by the District Court. TheCourt that the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Ninth Circuit) on August 19, 2011, issued a decision vacatingvacated and remanding the caseremanded with instructions to the District Court. On remand, the District Court is instructed to properly exercise its discretion in accordance with the principles set forth in the decision by the Ninth Circuit. In re-examining this case, the District Court may re-affirm its prior approval of the settlement, disapprove the settlement or approve a modified settlement. The District Court must properly analyze the conduct of the parties and their counsel in accordance with the instructions of the Ninth Circuit. The District Court established a schedule to accomplish this analysis and to re-issuere-issued its decision and judgment. We will continuejudgment in August 2012, significantly reducing the amount of attorneys' fees awarded to defend our interests throughout thiscounsel for the plaintiffs. The time for further appeal has now expired. The defendants are in process of making the settlement payments to the four charitable institutions entitled to receive those payments and to pay the remainder of the case.attorneys' fees and costs. Once these payments are finalized, a dismissal with prejudice is expected to be entered. We believe that any loss related to these proceedings would not be material and have adequately reserved for these costs in the consolidated financial statements.

On October 12, 2012, GN Netcom, Inc. sued Plantronics, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, case number 1:12cv01318, alleging violations of the Sherman Act, the Clayton Act, and Delaware common law. In its complaint, GN specifically alleges four causes of action: Monopolization, Attempted Monopolization, Concerted Action in Restraint of Trade, and Tortious Interference with Business Relations. GN claims that Plantronics dominates the market for headsets sold into contact centers in the United States and that a critical channel for sales of headsets to contact centers is through a limited network of specialized independent distributors (“SIDs”). GN asserts that Plantronics attracts SIDs through Plantronics Only Distributor Agreements and the use of these agreements is allegedly illegal. Plantronics denies each of the allegations in the complaint and is vigorously defending itself.

In addition, we are presently engaged in various legal actions arising in the normal course of business.  We believe it is unlikely that any of these actions will have a material adverse impact on our operating results; however, because of the inherent uncertainties of litigation, the outcome of any of these actions could be unfavorable and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

ITEM 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

2627

Table of Contents

PART II
 
ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER REPURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
 
Price Range of Common Stock
 
Our common stock is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol “PLT”.  The following table sets forth the low and high sales prices as reported on the NYSE for each period indicated.indicated:

Low HighLow High
Fiscal Year 2013   
First Quarter$28.95
 $40.80
Second Quarter$31.31
 $37.66
Third Quarter$31.30
 $37.29
Fourth Quarter$36.87
 $45.61
Fiscal Year 2012   
 
  
First Quarter$33.51
 $38.87
$33.51
 $38.87
Second Quarter28.45
 38.26
$28.45
 $38.26
Third Quarter27.45
 35.98
$27.45
 $35.98
Fourth Quarter35.12
 40.26
$35.12
 $40.26
Fiscal Year 2011 
  
First Quarter$27.80
 $34.17
Second Quarter26.79
 34.28
Third Quarter33.30
 38.20
Fourth Quarter33.75
 38.04

As of April 28, 2012,27, 2013, there were approximately 6050 holders of record of our common stock.  Because many of our shares of common stock are held by brokers and other institutions on behalf of beneficial owners, we are unable to estimate the total number of beneficial owners, but we believe it is significantly higher than the number of record holders.  On March 30, 2012,28, 2013, the last trading day of fiscal year 20122013, the last sale reported on the NYSE for Plantronics’our common stock was $40.26$44.19 per share.

Cash Dividends
 
InQuarterly dividends paid per share in fiscal years 20122013 and 20112012, we paid quarterly cash dividends of were $0.10 and $0.05, per sharerespectively, resulting in total payments of $9.017.1 million and $9.79.0 million, respectively. On March 19, 2012, our Board of Directors ("Board") approved a proposal to increase the rate of the Company's quarterly dividend from $0.05 per share to $0.10 per share as presented at the meeting, subject to the Audit Committee approving and declaring dividends. On April 27, 2012, the Audit Committee approved the payment of a dividend of $0.10 per share on June 8, 2012 to holders of record on May 18, 2012. We expect to continue paying a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share of our common stock; however, the actual declaration of dividends and the establishment of record and payment dates are subject to final determination by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors each quarter after its review of our financial performance and financial position.


28

Table of Contents

Share Repurchase Programs
 
The following table presents a month-to-month summary of the stock purchase activity in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 20122013:

 
Total Number of Shares Purchased 1
 
Average Price Paid per Share 4
 Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs 
Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs 5
January 1, 2012 to January 28, 201279,439
 $36.11
 79,439
 705,642
January 29, 2012 to March 3, 2012501,336
2 
$37.80
 497,650
 207,992
March 4, 2012 to March 31, 2012574,379
3 
$37.25
 574,379
 633,613
 
Total Number of Shares Purchased 1
 
Average Price Paid per Share 2
 Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs 
Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs 4
December 30, 2012 to January 26, 20132,200
 $35.99
 2,200
 887,595
January 27, 2013 to March 2, 20139,959
3 
$39.74
 5,000
 882,595
March 3, 2013 to March 30, 2013688
 $39.81
 688
 881,907




27

Table of Contents

1 

On March 1, 2011,August 6, 2012, the Board of Directors ("Board") authorized a program to repurchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, 390,900 shares were repurchased under this program and, as of March 31, 2012, there were no remaining shares authorized for repurchase. On May 3, 2011, the Board authorized the repurchase of up to 7,000,000 shares of our common stock through open market or privately negotiated transactions. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, 394,181 shares were repurchased under this authorization and, as of March 31, 2012, there were no remaining shares authorized for repurchase. On March 8, 2012, the Board authorized a new program to repurchase 1,000,000 shares of our common stock. As of March 31, 2012, there were 633,613 remaining shares authorized for repurchase under this program.
  
2 

Includes 359,887 shares"Average Price Paid per Share" reflects only our open market repurchases of our common stock received upon settlement of an accelerated share repurchase agreement ("ASR Agreement"). Refer to Note 13, Common Stock Repurchases, of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-K for more information regarding the ASR Agreement.
stock.
  
3 

Includes 3,6864,959 shares that were tendered to us in satisfaction of employee tax withholding obligations upon the vesting of restricted stock grantedgrants under our stock plans.
  
4 

The calculation of average price paid per share only includes amounts attributable to repurchases inThese shares reflect the open market. In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2012, we received 359,887 shares of our common stock upon settlement of the ASR Agreement, for a total of 1,496,251 shares at an average price per share of $33.42 based on the volume-weighted average price of our common stock during the term of the ASR Agreement, less a discount. Refer to Note 13, Common Stock Repurchases, of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-K for more information regarding the ASR Agreement.
5

"Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased under the Plans or Programs" reflects the remainingavailable shares authorized for repurchase under the March 8,August 6, 2012 program for the repurchase of 1,000,000 shares.program.

Refer to Note 13,12, Common Stock Repurchases, of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information regarding our stock repurchase programs.



2829

Table of Contents

ITEM 6.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
 
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
 
The information set forth below is not necessarily indicative of results of future operations and should be read in conjunction with Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K in order to fully understand factors that may affect the comparability of the information presented below. Fiscal year 2010 consisted of 53 weeks and all other fiscal years presented consisted of 52 weeks.  

Fiscal Year Ended March 31,Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
2012 
2011  1, 2
 
2010 1,3
 
2009 1,3,4
 
2008 3
2013 1
 
2012  
 
2011 2,3
 
2010 2,4
 
2009 2,4,5
($ in thousands, except per share data)($ in thousands, except per share data)
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA: 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
Net revenues$713,368
 $683,602
 $613,837
 $674,590
 $747,935
$762,226
 $713,368
 $683,602
 $613,837
 $674,590
Operating income$141,353
 $140,712
 $97,635
 $61,461
 $115,166
$138,097
 $141,353
 $140,712
 $97,635
 $61,461
Operating margin19.8% 20.6% 15.9% 9.1% 15.4%18.1% 19.8% 20.6% 15.9% 9.1%
Income from continuing operations$142,602
 $140,656
 $100,740
 $57,917
 $121,020
$138,425
 $142,602
 $140,656
 $100,740
 $57,917
Income from continuing operations, net of tax$109,036
 $109,243
 $76,453
 $45,342
 $92,012
$106,402
 $109,036
 $109,243
 $76,453
 $45,342
Basic earnings per share - continuing operations$2.48
 $2.29
 $1.58
 $0.93
 $1.91
$2.55
 $2.48
 $2.29
 $1.58
 $0.93
Diluted earnings per share - continuing operations$2.41
 $2.21
 $1.55
 $0.93
 $1.87
$2.49
 $2.41
 $2.21
 $1.55
 $0.93
Loss on discontinued operations, net of tax$
 $
 $(19,075) $(110,241) $(23,617)$
 $
 $
 $(19,075) $(110,241)
Cash dividends declared per common share$0.20
 $0.20
 $0.20
 $0.20
 $0.20
$
 $0.20
 $0.20
 $0.20
 $0.20
Shares used in basic per share calculations44,023
 47,713
 48,504
 48,589
 48,232
41,748
 44,023
 47,713
 48,504
 48,589
Shares used in diluted per share calculations45,265
 49,344
 49,331
 48,947
 49,090
42,738
 45,265
 49,344
 49,331
 48,947
BALANCE SHEET DATA:   
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
Cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments$334,512
 $429,956
 $369,192
 $218,180
 $163,091
$345,357
 $334,512
 $429,956
 $369,192
 $218,180
Total assets$672,470
 $744,647
 $655,351
 $633,120
 $741,393
$764,605
 $672,470
 $744,647
 $655,351
 $633,120
Revolving line of credit$37,000
 $
 $
 $
 $
$
 $37,000
 $
 $
 $
Other long-term obligations$13,360
 $12,667
 $13,850
 $13,698
 $14,989
$12,930
 $13,360
 $12,667
 $13,850
 $13,698
Total stockholders' equity$527,244
 $634,852
 $571,334
 $525,367
 $578,620
$646,447
 $527,244
 $634,852
 $571,334
 $525,367
OTHER DATA: 
      
  
 
      
  
Cash provided from operating activities$140,448
 $158,232
 $143,729
 $99,150
 $102,900
$125,501
 $140,448
 $158,232
 $143,729
 $99,150


1

We initiated a restructuring plan during the third quarter of fiscal year 2013. Under the plan, we reallocated costs by eliminating certain positions in the US., Mexico, China, and Europe, and transitioned some of these positions to lower cost locations. As part of this plan, we also plan to vacate a portion of a leased facility at our corporate headquarters in the first quarter of fiscal year 2014. The pre-tax charges incurred during fiscal year 2013 included $1.9 million for severance and related benefits and an immaterial amount of accelerated amortization on leasehold assets with no alternative future use. We expect to incur $1.0 million for lease termination costs to be recorded when we exit the facility in the first quarter of fiscal year 2014. We anticipate the restructuring plan will be substantially complete by the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2014.
2 
During fiscal year 2009, we announced several restructuring plans whichthat included reductions in force, including the planned closure of our Suzhou, China Bluetooth manufacturing facility in fiscal year 2010.  As a result of these activities,In fiscal year 2009, $11.0 million in restructuring and other related charges has beenare included in our consolidated income from continuing operations for the year ended March 31, 2009.operations.  In fiscal year 2010, we recorded an additional $1.9 million of Restructuringrestructuring and other related charges consisting of $0.8 million of severance and benefits and $1.1 million of non-cash charges, including $0.7 million for the acceleration of depreciation on building and equipment associated with research and development and administrative functions due to the change in the assets’ useful lives as a result of the assets being taken out of service prior to their original service period and $0.4 million of additional loss on Assetsassets held for sale.  In addition, in fiscal year 2010, we recorded non-cash accelerated depreciation charges of $5.2 million for accelerated depreciation related to the building and equipment associated with manufacturing operations, which is included in Costcost of revenues.  There were no charges in fiscal year 2011; however, we completed the sale of our Suzhou facility, resulting in an immaterial net gain recorded in Restructuringrestructuring and other related charges. See Note 9 of the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes, included elsewhere, herein.

2

3
 
During fiscal year 2011, we recognized a gain of $5.1 million upon receiving payment from a competitor to dismiss litigation involving the alleged theft of our trade secrets. In addition, we recorded $1.4 million in accelerated amortization expense to reflect the revised estimated life of an intangible asset we deemed to be abandoned.

3

4
 
On December 1, 2009, we completed the sale of Altec Lansing, our AEG segment, and, therefore, its results are no longer included in continuing operations for the periods presented.  Accordingly, we have classified the AEG operating results, including the loss on sale, as discontinued operations in the Consolidated statement of operations for all periods presented.  See Note 4 of the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes, included elsewhere, herein.

4

5
 
As originally reported in fiscal year 2009, potentially dilutive common shares attributable to employee stock plans diluted shares were excluded from the diluted share calculation as they would have been anti-dilutive and would have reduced the net loss per share; however, as a result of reporting our AEG segment as discontinued operations, the anti-dilution of these potentially dilutive common shares is now based on income from continuing operations as compared to net income (loss) and are now included in the shares used in diluted per share calculation.

2930

Table of Contents

ITEM 7.   MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
The following discussion and analysis is intended to help you understand our results of operations and financial condition. It is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.  This discussion contains forward-looking statements.  Please see the "Cautionary Statement" and "Risk Factors" above for discussions of the uncertainties, risks, and assumptions associated with these statements.  Our fiscal year-end financial reporting periods are 52 or 53 week years endingend on the Saturday closest to March 31st.  Fiscal yearyears 2013, 2012 had 52 weeks, and ended on March 31, 2012. Fiscal year 2011 each had 52 weeks and ended on March 30, 2013, March 31, 2012, and April 2, 2011.  Fiscal, respectively.  For purposes of presentation, wehave indicated our accounting fiscal year 2010 had 53 weeks, with the extra week occurring in the fourth quarter of the year, and endedas ending on April 3, 2010.  Except as noted, financial results are for continuing operations; Altec Lansing, our former AEG segment, was sold effective December 1, 2009 and is reported as discontinued operations.March 31.

OVERVIEW
 
We are a leading designer, manufacturer, and marketer of lightweight communications headsets, telephone headset systems, and accessories for the worldwide business and consumer markets under the Plantronics brand.  In addition, we manufacture and market, under our Clarity brand, specialty telephone products, such as telephones for the hearing impaired, and other related products for people with special communication needs.

Our priorities during fiscal year 20122013 were to win in Unified Communications (“UC”), to improve our execution effectiveness, and to deliver strong financial results. We sharply increased revenues from UC products, growing by 76%40% over the prior year to $93.4$130.8 million and believe we continueour innovation and breakthroughs in contextual intelligence and other product features and enhancements spurred this growth and allowed us to leadmaintain a premium position in the marketmarket. Our increased investments in this category. We improved our execution effectiveness by extending our Simply Smarter CommunicationsTM technology branding to become an integral partResearch and Development versus a year ago yielded increased functionality for UC endpoints and successful launches of the value proposition available through UC solutions.new consumer products in key markets.  We also created the Plantronics Developer Connection (“PDC”), subsequently launched on May 9, 2012,continued to extend the opportunitiesinvest in UCour global sales force in order to bring these and other products to the vast ecosystemmarketplace. Despite macroeconomic headwinds in some of vendors, application developers and vertical markets. Even with continued pressures from the macroeconomic environment,our key markets, we deliveredachieved strong financial results. As part of our continued commitment to a strong and innovative set of integrated solutions, we increased research, development and engineering spending by approximately 10% over the prior year, yet still achieved $109.0results, delivering $106.4 million in net income, representing approximately 15%14% of our net revenues.
      
We believe UC represents our key long-term driver of revenue and profit growth, and it continues to be our primary focus area. Business communications are being transformed from voice-centric systems supported by traditional PBX infrastructure to communication systems that are fully integrated with voice, video, and data and are supported by feature richfeature-rich UC software. With this transformation, the requirement for a traditional headset used only for voice communications continues to evolve into a device that delivers contextual intelligence, providing the ability to reach people using the mode of communication that is most effective, on the device that is most convenient, and with control over when and how they can be reached. Our portfolio of UC solutions combines hardware with advanced sensor technology and capitalizes on contextual intelligence, addressing the needs of the constantly changing business environments and evolving work styles to make connecting easier and by sharing presence information to convey user availability and other contextual information. We believe UC systems will become more commonly adopted by enterprises to reduce costs and improve collaboration, and we believe our solutions with Simply Smarter CommunicationsTM® technology will be an important part of the UC environment.

The contact center is the most mature market in which we participate, and we expect this market to grow slowly over the long-term. Given the migration to UC by corporations globally, we also expect the market for headsets for non-UC enterprise applications to grow very slowly.slowly, if at all. We believe the growth of UC will increase overall headset adoption in enterprise environments and we therefore expect most of the growth in Office and Contact Center ("OCC") over the next five years to come from headsets designed for UC.

BasedIn fiscal year 2013, we built on the prioritization of UC investmentstraction gained during fiscal year 2012 in fiscal years 2010 and 2011, our Bluetooth product portfolio for mobile phone applications was less competitive duringwith the first halfintroduction of fiscal year 2012, contributing to a decline in our Mobile market share. However, by the beginning of our third quarter, we were in volume production on several new models, that were well-received andincluding Legend, our market share position began recovering. Over the course of the year, we also invested in the stereo Bluetooth mobile category and, at the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2012, introduced the BackBeat GO, our first stereonext-generation Voyager mono Bluetooth product, in several years. While we experienced an approximate 4% declinewhich was successfully launched in the Mobile categorysecond half of the fiscal year. We believe we gained share in fiscal year 2012 over fiscal year 2011, due in part to weakness in theboth stereo and mono Bluetooth product category, we believecategories during fiscal year 2013 and intend to manage our recent and planned investments will help position usportfolio to maintain or grow share in the overall market for Bluetooth headsets.going forward.


30

Table of Contents

Integral to our core research and development in fiscal year 20122013 were investments in firmware and software engineering to enhance the broad compatibility of our products in the enterprise systems with which they will be deployed and development of value-added software applications for business users. We believe our investments in strategic architecting may allow us to differentiate our products and sustain strong long-term gross margins. During fiscal year 2012,2013, we continued to strengthen our strategic partnerships with platform suppliers to ensure that our products areremain compatible with all major platforms as UC usage becomes an essential part of a unified work environment.


31

Table of Contents

Looking forward, we continue to believe that UC is a key long-term driver of revenue and profit growth. We remain cautious about the macroeconomic environment and will monitor our expenditures accordingly; however, we will continue to invest strategically in our long-term growth opportunities. We will continue focusing on innovative product development through our core research and development efforts, including the use of software and services as part of our portfolio. As part of our commitment to UC, we recently announced in the PDC,first quarter of fiscal year 2013 the Plantronics Developer Connection ("PDC") , which provides a software developer kit allowing registered developers access to a rich set of tools and providing a forum to interact, share ideas and develop innovative applications. We believe the PDC is a valuable resource for application developers to leverage the contextual intelligence built into our headsets, ultimately providing an endless array of capabilities such as user authentication, customer information retrieval based on incoming mobile calls, and connection of a user's physical actions in the real world to the virtual world. We will also continue to grow our sales force and increase marketing and other customer service and support as we expand key strategic partnerships to market our UC products.  We believe we have an excellent position in the market and a well-deserved reputation for quality and service that we will continually strive to earn through ongoing investment and strong execution.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
The following tables set forth, for the periods indicated, the consolidated statements of operations data.  The financial information and the ensuing discussion should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.  Except as noted, financial results are for continuing operations.  Altec Lansing, our former AEG segment, was sold effective December 1, 2009.  We have classified the AEG operating results as discontinued operations in the Consolidated statement of operations for all periods presented.

(in thousands) Fiscal Year Ended March 31, Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
 2012 2011 2010 2013 2012 2011
Net revenues $713,368
 100.0% $683,602
 100.0 % $613,837
 100.0 % $762,226
100.0% $713,368
100.0% $683,602
100.0 %
Cost of revenues 329,017
 46.1% 321,846
 47.1 % 312,767
 51.0 % 359,045
47.1% 329,017
46.1% 321,846
47.1 %
Gross profit 384,351
 53.9% 361,756
 52.9 % 301,070
 49.0 % 403,181
52.9% 384,351
53.9% 361,756
52.9 %
Operating expenses:  
    
  
  
  
  
  

 
 

 
Research, development and engineering 69,664
 9.8% 63,183
 9.2 % 57,784
 9.4 % 80,373
10.5% 69,664
9.8% 63,183
9.2 %
Selling, general and administrative 173,334
 24.3% 163,389
 23.9 % 143,784
 23.4 % 182,445
23.9% 173,334
24.3% 163,389
23.9 %
Gain from litigation settlement 
 % (5,100) (0.7)% 
 
 
% 
% (5,100)(0.7)%
Restructuring and other related charges 
 % (428) (0.1)% 1,867
 0.3 % 2,266
0.3% 
% (428)(0.1)%
Total operating expenses 242,998
 34.1% 221,044
 32.3 % 203,435
 33.1 % 265,084
34.8% 242,998
34.1% 221,044
32.3 %
Operating income 141,353
 19.8% 140,712
 20.6 % 97,635
 15.9 % 138,097
18.1% 141,353
19.8% 140,712
20.6 %
Interest and other income (expense), net 1,249
 0.2% (56)  % 3,105
 0.5 % 328
% 1,249
0.2% (56) %
Income from continuing operations before income taxes 142,602
 20.0% 140,656
 20.6 % 100,740
 16.4 %
Income tax expense from continuing operations 33,566
 4.7% 31,413
 4.6 % 24,287
 4.0 %
Income from continuing operations, net of tax 109,036
 15.3% 109,243
 16.0 % 76,453
 12.5 %
Discontinued operations:  
    
  
  
  
Loss from operations of discontinued AEG segment (including loss on sale) 
 
 
  % (30,468) (5.0)%
Income tax benefit on discontinued operations 
 
 
  % (11,393) (1.9)%
Loss on discontinued operations 
 
 
  % (19,075) (3.1)%
Income before income taxes 138,425
18.2% 142,602
20.0% 140,656
20.6 %
Income tax expense 32,023
4.2% 33,566
4.7% 31,413
4.6 %
Net income $109,036
 15.3% $109,243
 16.0 % $57,378
 9.3 % $106,402
14.0% $109,036
15.3% $109,243
16.0 %

31

Table of Contents


Net Revenues

 Fiscal Year Ended     Fiscal Year Ended     Fiscal Year Ended     Fiscal Year Ended    
(in thousands) March 31, 2012 March 31, 2011 Increase (Decrease) March 31, 2011 March 31, 2010 Increase (Decrease) March 31, 2013 March 31, 2012 Change March 31, 2012 March 31, 2011 Change
Net revenues:                                
Office and Contact Center $531,709
 $490,472
 $41,237
 8.4 % $490,472
 $404,397
 $86,075
 21.3 %
OCC $549,301
 $531,709
 $17,592
 3.3 % $531,709
 $490,472
 $41,237
 8.4 %
Mobile 131,825
 137,530
 (5,705) (4.1)% 137,530
 149,756
 (12,226) (8.2)% 163,460
 131,825
 31,635
 24.0 % 131,825
 137,530
 (5,705) (4.1)%
Gaming and Computer Audio 31,855
 36,736
 (4,881) (13.3)% 36,736
 39,260
 (2,524) (6.4)% 30,747
 31,855
 (1,108) (3.5)% 31,855
 36,736
 (4,881) (13.3)%
Clarity 17,979
 18,864
 (885) (4.7)% 18,864
 20,424
 (1,560) (7.6)% 18,718
 17,979
 739
 4.1 % 17,979
 18,864
 (885) (4.7)%
Total net revenues $713,368
 $683,602
 $29,766
 4.4 % $683,602
 $613,837
 $69,765
 11.4 % $762,226
 $713,368
 $48,858
 6.8 % $713,368
 $683,602
 $29,766
 4.4 %

OCC products represent our largest source of revenues, while Mobile products represent our largest unit volumes.  Net revenues may vary due to seasonality, the timing of new product introductions and discontinuation of existing products, discounts and other incentives, and channel mix. Net revenues derived from sales of consumer goods into the retail channel typically account for a seasonal increase in our net revenues in the third quarter of our fiscal year.

32

Table of Contents

Our consolidated net revenues increased in fiscal year 2013 compared to fiscal year 2012 driven by growth in Mobile product revenues as a result of our stronger portfolio of Mobile products and increased demand attributable to hands-free laws enacted in the People's Republic of China (PRC) during the fiscal year. OCC product revenues also increased, primarily as a result of growth in demand for UC.  Unfavorable foreign exchange fluctuations in the Euro ("EUR") and Great Britain Pound ("GBP") reduced net revenues by approximately $6.1 million in fiscal year 2013 compared to fiscal year 2012, net of the effects of hedging.
Our consolidated net revenues increased in fiscal year 2012 compared to fiscal year 2011 driven by growth in OCC product revenues as a result of higher volumes due to growth in demand for UC.  In addition, favorable foreign exchange fluctuations in the Euro ("EUR") and Great Britain Pound ("GBP") contributed approximately $4.0 million to the growth in our net revenues.

Our consolidatedThese increases were partially offset by a decrease in Mobile net revenues increased in fiscal year 2011 compareddue mostly to fiscal year 2010 primarily in our OCC product category as a result of growth in demand for UC, offset partly byoverall weakness in the Bluetooth market and loss of market share which resultedproduct category, resulting in a decrease inlower unit volume of sales. We also believe our Mobile product revenues. While we experienced foreign exchange fluctuations in our net revenues during the first half of both fiscal years 2011 and 2010, the overall foreign exchange impact for eachshare of the fiscal years was not material.

Fluctuations in net revenuestotal market decreased in fiscal year 2012, compared to fiscal year 2011 resulted primarily from the following:



$41.2 million increase in OCC net revenues as a result of higher volumes due to growth in demand for UC products;



$5.7 million decrease in Mobile net revenues due mostly to overall weakness in the product category, which resulted in a lower unit volume of sales. We also believe our share of the total global market decreased, with reductions in U.S. market share offset partially by gains achieved internationally; and,



$4.9 million decrease in U.S. market share offset partially by gains achieved internationally. In addition, Gaming and Computer Audio net revenues due primarily to market share loss as a result of decreased investment in this category over the last two years as we have prioritized our investments in UC products and development. We are currently planning to increase our investments in this area to enable future growth.
Fluctuations in net revenues decreased due primarily to market share loss resulting from decreased investment in this category in fiscal yearyears 2012 and 2011 compared to fiscal year 2010 resulted primarily from the following:as we prioritized our investments in UC products and development.



$86.1 million increase in OCC net revenues as a result of higher volumes due to improved global economic conditions and growth in demand for UC products; and,



$12.2 million decrease in Mobile net revenues due primarily to overall weakness in the product category, which resulted in a lower unit volume of sales.


32

Table of Contents

GeographicalGeographic Information

 Fiscal Year Ended     Fiscal Year Ended     Fiscal Year Ended     Fiscal Year Ended    
(in thousands) March 31, 2012 March 31, 2011 Increase (Decrease) March 31, 2011 March 31, 2010 Increase (Decrease) March 31, 2013 March 31, 2012 Change March 31, 2012 March 31, 2011 Change
Net revenues:                                
United States $406,233
 $400,292
 $5,941
 1.5% $400,292
 $378,119
 $22,173
 5.9% $436,447
 $406,233
 $30,214
 7.4% $406,233
 $400,292
 $5,941
 1.5%
As a percentage of net revenues 56.9% 58.6% (1.7) ppt. 58.6% 61.6% (3.0) ppt. 57.3% 56.9% 
 56.9% 58.6% 
 
Europe, Middle East and Africa 181,761
 169,521
 12,240
 7.2% 169,521
 148,070
 21,451
 14.5%
Europe and Africa 181,439
 177,157
 4,282
 2.4% 177,157
 165,800
 11,357
 6.8%
Asia Pacific 74,249
 62,697
 11,552
 18.4% 62,697
 46,494
 16,203
 34.8% 92,193
 78,853
 13,340
 16.9% 78,853
 66,419
 12,434
 18.7%
Americas, excluding United States 51,125
 51,092
 33
 0.1% 51,092
 41,154
 9,938
 24.1% 52,147
 51,125
 1,022
 2.0% 51,125
 51,091
 34
 0.1%
Total international net revenues 307,135
 283,310
 23,825
 8.4% 283,310
 235,718
 47,592
 20.2% 325,779
 307,135
 18,644
 6.1% 307,135
 283,310
 23,825
 8.4%
As a percentage of net revenues 43.1% 41.4% 1.7
 ppt. 41.4% 38.4% 3.0
 ppt. 42.7% 43.1% 
 43.1% 41.4% 
 
Total consolidated net revenues $713,368
 $683,602
 $29,766
 4.4% $683,602
 $613,837
 $69,765
 11.4%
Total net revenues $762,226
 $713,368
 $48,858
 6.8% $713,368
 $683,602
 $29,766
 4.4%

As a percentage of total net revenues, consolidated U.S. net revenues remained flat in fiscal year 2013 compared to fiscal year 2012. As a percentage of total net revenues, consolidated international net revenues also remained flat in fiscal year 2013 compared to fiscal year 2012. The increase in absolute dollars in U.S. net revenues resulted from increased OCC net revenues due to continued growth in demand for UC. The increase in absolute dollars in international revenues was due primarily to increased Mobile net revenues driven mainly by increased demand attributable to hands-free laws enacted in the PRC during the fiscal year and to a lesser extent, the benefit of a stronger portfolio, especially in Europe and Africa. International revenues were reduced by approximately $6.1 million in fiscal year 2013 compared to fiscal year 2012, due to unfavorable foreign exchange fluctuations in the EUR and GBP, net of the effects of hedging.
As a percentage of total net revenues, consolidated U.S. net revenues decreased by 1.7 percentage points to 57%in fiscal year 2012 from 59% incompared to fiscal year 2011 due mostly to strong international growth in OCC net revenues and by weakness in the Mobile product category in the U.S. As a percentage of total net revenues, consolidated international net revenues increased to 43%in fiscal year 2012 from 41% incompared to fiscal year 2011. The increase in absolute dollars in U.S. net revenues resulted from increased OCC net revenues due to growth in demand for UC. The increase in absolute dollars in international revenues was also due to increased OCC net revenues, alongcoupled with an increase in Mobile net revenues as we gained market share in markets outside the U.S.

33


As a percentage of total net revenues, consolidated U.S. net revenues decreased by 3.0 percentage points to 59% in fiscal year 2011 from 62% in fiscal year 2010 due mostly to weakness in the Mobile product category in the U.S. As a percentage of total net revenues, consolidated international net revenues increased to 41% in fiscal year 2011 from 38% in fiscal year 2010. The increase in absolute dollars in U.S. net revenues was a result of increased OCC net revenues due to growth in demand for UC. The increase in absolute dollars in international net revenues was also due to increased OCC net revenues along with an increase in Mobile net revenues from market share gains in markets outside the U.S.

Cost of Revenues and Gross Profit
 
Cost of revenues consists primarily of direct manufacturing and contract manufacturer costs, warranty expense, freight expense, depreciation, duty expense, reserves for excess and obsolete inventory, royalties, and an allocation of overhead expenses, including facilities, IT, and facilitieshuman resources costs.

 Fiscal Year Ended     Fiscal Year Ended     Fiscal Year Ended     Fiscal Year Ended    
(in thousands) March 31, 2012 March 31, 2011 Increase (Decrease) March 31, 2011 March 31, 2010 Increase (Decrease) March 31, 2013 March 31, 2012 Change March 31, 2012 March 31, 2011 Change
Net revenues $713,368
 $683,602
 $29,766
 4.4% $683,602
 $613,837
 $69,765
 11.4% $762,226
 $713,368
 $48,858
 6.8% $713,368
 $683,602
 $29,766
 4.4%
Cost of revenues 329,017
 321,846
 7,171
 2.2% 321,846
 312,767
 9,079
 2.9% 359,045
 329,017
 30,028
 9.1% 329,017
 321,846
 7,171
 2.2%
Gross profit $384,351
 $361,756
 $22,595
 6.2% $361,756
 $301,070
 $60,686
 20.2% $403,181
 $384,351
 $18,830
 4.9% $384,351
 $361,756
 $22,595
 6.2%
Gross profit % 53.9% 52.9% 1.0
 ppt. 52.9% 49.0% 3.9
 ppt. 52.9% 53.9% 
   53.9% 52.9% 
  

The increase in gross profit in fiscal year 2013 compared to fiscal year 2012 was due primarily to the increase in net revenues. As a percentage of net revenues, gross profit decreased primarily from the effect of product mix being weighted more heavily to Mobile products, resulting from demand attributable to hands-free laws enacted in the PRC during the fiscal year and to a lesser extent, from the effect of a stronger U.S. dollar.

The increase in gross profit in fiscal year 2012 compared to fiscal year 2011 was due primarily to increasedthe increase in net revenues of $29.8 million along withand operational efficiencies.  As a percentage of net revenues, gross profit increased due primarily to operational efficiencies such as lower freight and logistics costs and the benefits from a weaker U.S. dollar, offset partially by the net effect of unfavorable component sourcing costs, slightly higher warranty obligations, and reserves for excess and obsolete inventory.


33


The increase in gross profit in fiscal year 2011 compared to fiscal year 2010 was due primarily to increased net revenues of $69.8 million along with improved margins on those revenues. As a percentage of net revenues, gross profit increased due primarily to higher product margins, driven by a greater proportion of net revenues from our higher margin OCC products and improved Bluetooth margins resulting from our decision to outsource manufacturing which commenced in July 2009, and lower depreciation expenses in fiscal year 2011 due to accelerated depreciation expenses in fiscal year 2010 related to the closure of our Suzhou, China manufacturing facility.

There are significant variances in gross profit percentages between our higher and lower margin products; therefore, small variations in product mix, which can be difficult to predict, can have a significant impact on gross profit.  In addition, if we do not accurately anticipate changes in demand, we have in the past, and may in the future, incur significant costs associated with writing off excess and obsolete inventory or incur charges for adverse purchase commitments.  Gross profit may also vary based on distribution channel, return rates, and other factors.

Research, Development, and Engineering
 
Research, development, and engineering costs are expensed as incurred and consist primarily of compensation costs, outside services, including legal fees associated with protecting our intellectual property, expensed materials, depreciation, and an allocation of overhead expenses, including facilities, IT, and human resources costs.

 Fiscal Year Ended     Fiscal Year Ended     Fiscal Year Ended     Fiscal Year Ended    
(in thousands) March 31, 2012 March 31, 2011 Increase (Decrease) March 31, 2011 March 31, 2010 Increase (Decrease) March 31, 2013 March 31, 2012 Change March 31, 2012 March 31, 2011 Change
Research, development and engineering $69,664
 $63,183
 $6,481
 10.3% $63,183
 $57,784
 $5,399
 9.3% $80,373
 $69,664
 $10,709
 15.4% $69,664
 $63,183
 $6,481
 10.3%
% of total consolidated net revenues 9.8% 9.2% 0.6
 ppt. 9.2% 9.4% (0.2) ppt.
% of total net revenues 10.5% 9.8% 

   9.8% 9.2% 
  

The increase in research, development and engineering expenses in fiscal year 2013 compared to fiscal year 2012 was due primarily to $9.1 million in headcount-related costs, including increased salary expense, higher levels of performance-based compensation related to stronger achievement against targets and, to a lesser extent, various other support costs related to higher headcount. 

The increase in research, development and engineering expenses in fiscal year 2012 compared to fiscal year 2011was due primarily to $4.2 million in higher compensation costs resulting from increased headcount and related costs to support investments in UC and software and $1.8 million in increased investments in UC product development, offset partially by lower performance-based compensation related to lower achievement ofagainst targets.


The increase in research, development and engineering expenses in fiscal year 2011 compared to fiscal year 2010 was due primarily to increased compensation costs resulting from increased headcount and higher performance-based compensation on higher achievement
34


Selling, General, and Administrative
 
Selling, general, and administrative expense consists primarily of compensation costs, marketing costs, travel expenses, expensed equipment, professional service fees, and allocations of overhead expenses, including IT, facilities, and human resources costs.

 Fiscal Year Ended     Fiscal Year Ended     Fiscal Year Ended     Fiscal Year Ended    
(in thousands) March 31, 2012 March 31, 2011 Increase (Decrease) March 31, 2011 March 31, 2010 Increase (Decrease) March 31, 2013 March 31, 2012 Change March 31, 2012 March 31, 2011 Change
Selling, general and administrative $173,334
 $163,389
 $9,945
 6.1% $163,389
 $143,784
 $19,605
 13.6% $182,445
 $173,334
 $9,111
 5.3% $173,334
 $163,389
 $9,945
 6.1%
% of total consolidated net revenues 24.3% 23.9% 0.4
 ppt. 23.9% 23.4% 0.5
 ppt.
% of total net revenues 23.9% 24.3% 

   24.3% 23.9% 

  

The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses in fiscal year 2013 compared to fiscal year 2012 was due primarily to $9.3 million in higher compensation costs resulting from increased headcount, mainly resulting from our investment in Plantronics' global sales presence, and from higher performance-based compensation, including sales commissions, reflecting higher net revenues and higher overall achievement against targets. We also made additional investments in marketing programs of $3.7 million, including product launch activities and brand awareness campaigns. These increases were offset in part by an approximate $2.4 million reduction in expense from the effects of a stronger U.S. Dollar.

The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses in fiscal year 2012 compared to fiscal year 2011was due primarily to $8.2 million in higher compensation costs resulting from increased headcount and $2.3 million in increased marketing and sales promotions and travel-related costs associated with increased net revenues. These increases were offset in part by a $1.6 million decrease in professional service fees related to litigation that was settled favorably in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011 and lower performance-based compensation resulting from lower achievement ofagainst targets.


34


The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses in fiscal year 2011 compared to fiscal year 2010 was due primarily to $8.9 million in increased compensation costs resulting from increased headcount and higher performance-based compensation on higher achievement of targets, $7.1 million in increased marketing and sales promotions, travel-related expenses and external sales representative fees and commissions associated with higher net revenues, and $2.5 million in increased legal costs due to additional litigation that was settled favorably in fiscal year 2011. These increases were offset in part by a decrease of $1.1 million in depreciation expense due to assets being fully depreciated during fiscal year 2010 and a majority of the current capital projects were not completed and placed in service as of the end of fiscal year 2011.

Gain from Litigation Settlement

 Fiscal Year Ended     Fiscal Year Ended     Fiscal Year Ended     Fiscal Year Ended    
(in thousands) March 31, 2012 March 31, 2011 Increase (Decrease) March 31, 2011 March 31, 2010 Increase (Decrease) March 31, 2013 March 31, 2012 Change March 31, 2012 March 31, 2011 Change
Gain from Litigation Settlement $
 $(5,100) $5,100
 100.0% $(5,100) $
 $(5,100) 100.0% $
 $
 $
 % $
 $(5,100) $5,100
 100.0%
% of total consolidated net revenues % (0.7)% 0.7
 ppt. (0.7)% % (0.7) ppt.
% of total net revenues % % 

   % (0.7)% 

  

During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011, we entered into a binding settlement agreement to dismiss litigation involving the alleged theft of our trade secrets by a competitor in mobile headsets, and in the same quarter, pursuant to the settlement agreement, we received a $5.1 million payment in exchange for a full release and settlement of the claims.

Restructuring and Other Related Charges

 Fiscal Year Ended     Fiscal Year Ended     Fiscal Year Ended     Fiscal Year Ended    
(in thousands) March 31, 2012 March 31, 2011 Increase (Decrease) March 31, 2011 March 31, 2010 Increase (Decrease) March 31, 2013 March 31, 2012 Change March 31, 2012 March 31, 2011 Change
Restructuring and other related charges $
 $(428) $428
 (100.0)% $(428) $1,867
 $(2,295) (122.9)% $2,266
 $
 $2,266
 100.0% $
 $(428) $428
 (100.0)%
% of total consolidated net revenues % (0.1)% 0.1
 ppt. (0.1)% 0.3% (0.4) ppt.
% of total net revenues 0.3% % 

   % (0.1)% 
  
 
InWe initiated a restructuring plan during the third quarter of fiscal year 2009,2013.  Under the plan, we announced various restructuring activities that were completed aseliminated certain positions in the U.S., Mexico, China, and Europe, and transitioned some of December 31, 2010. There were no charges duringthese positions to lower cost locations.  We also plan to vacate a portion of a leased facility at our corporate headquarters in the years ended March 31, 2012 or 2011; however, infirst quarter of fiscal year 2011 we recorded an immaterial net gain upon the sale2014.  We expect to incur total pre-tax charges of a facility located in Chinaapproximately $3.1 million in connection with the restructuring activities. In fiscal year 2010, we recorded restructuring charges of $1.9 million, consisting of severance and benefits along with facilities and equipment charges.

Operating Income

  Fiscal Year Ended     Fiscal Year Ended    
(in thousands) March 31, 2012 March 31, 2011 Increase (Decrease) March 31, 2011 March 31, 2010 Increase (Decrease)
Operating income $141,353
 $140,712
 $641
 0.5% $140,712
 $97,635
 $43,077
 44.1%
% of total consolidated net revenues 19.8% 20.6% (0.8) ppt. 20.6% 15.9% 4.7
 ppt.

In fiscal year 2012, we reported operating income of $141.4 million comparedthis plan. Going forward, savings from this plan will allow us to $140.7 million in fiscal year 2011 due to increased net revenues and higher margins resulting primarily from a favorable product mix that consisted of a greater proportion of OCC net revenues, which generally have higher gross margins than other product categories, offset partially by higher operating expenses reflecting ourincrease investments in UC.

In fiscal year 2011,areas that we reported operating income of $140.7believe will improve our business growth, particularly sales and marketing, by $4.0 million compared to $97.6 million in fiscal year 2010 due to increased net revenues and higher margins resulting primarily from a favorable product mix that consisted of a greater proportion of OCC net revenues. In addition, we experienced improved Bluetooth margins resulting primarily from lower costs as a result of outsourcing our manufacturing operations in China, which began in July 2009.annually. 


35


Operating income may vary basedThe pre-tax charges incurred during fiscal year 2013 included $1.9 million for severance and related benefits and an immaterial amount of accelerated amortization expense on product mix shifts, product life cycles,leasehold improvement assets with no alternative future use. We expect to record $1.0 million for lease termination costs and seasonality.the remaining accelerated depreciation on leasehold improvements when we exit the facility in the first quarter of fiscal year 2014.  We anticipate that the plan will be substantially complete by the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2014.

Interest and Other Income (Expense), Net 

 Fiscal Year Ended     Fiscal Year Ended     Fiscal Year Ended     Fiscal Year Ended    
(in thousands) March 31, 2012 March 31, 2011 Increase (Decrease) March 31, 2011 March 31, 2010 Increase (Decrease) March 31, 2013 March 31, 2012 Change March 31, 2012 March 31, 2011 Change
Interest and other income (expense), net $1,249
 $(56) $1,305
 (2,330.4)% $(56) $3,105
 $(3,161) 101.8% $328
 $1,249
 $(921) (73.7)% $1,249
 $(56) $1,305
 (2,330.4)%
% of total net revenues 0.2%  % 0.2
 ppt.  % 0.5% (0.5) ppt. % 0.2% 

   0.2%  % 
  

InterestDuring fiscal year 2013, interest and other income (expense), net indecreased from the prior year due to lower levels of interest income on our investment portfolio and slightly higher interest expense on our revolving line of credit.

During fiscal year 2012, interest and other income (expense), net increased from fiscal year 2011 due primarily to the priorfiscal year 2011 including an expense related to penaltiesinterest and interestpenalties recorded upon settlement of an indirect tax matter in Brazil. In addition, we had greater interest income resulting from increased interest on a higher average investment portfolio in fiscal year 2012.

Interest and other income (expense), net in fiscal year 2011 decreased from fiscal year 2010 due primarily to greater foreign currency exchange gains in fiscal year 2010 as a result of a weaker U.S. Dollar in fiscal year 2010 than in fiscal year 2011, in addition to penalties and interest recorded in fiscal year 2011 related to the settlement of an indirect tax matter in Brazil. In addition, we generated income from a government stimulus program in Mexico in fiscal year 2010 that did not recur in fiscal year 2011.

Income Tax Expense

  Fiscal Year Ended   Fiscal Year Ended  
(in thousands) March 31, 2012 March 31, 2011 Increase (Decrease) March 31, 2011 March 31, 2010 Increase (Decrease)
Income from continuing operations before income taxes $142,602
 $140,656
 $1,946
 1.4 % $140,656
 $100,740
 $39,916
 39.6%
Income tax expense from continuing operations 33,566
 31,413
 2,153
 6.9 % 31,413
 24,287
 7,126
 29.3%
Income from continuing operations, net of tax $109,036
 $109,243
 $(207) (0.2)% $109,243
 $76,453
 $32,790
 42.9%
Effective tax rate 23.5% 22.3% 1.2
 ppt. 22.3% 24.1% (1.8) ppt.
  Fiscal Year Ended   Fiscal Year Ended  
(in thousands) March 31, 2013 March 31, 2012 Change March 31, 2012 March 31, 2011 Change
Income before income taxes $138,425
 $142,602
 $(4,177) (2.9)% $142,602
 $140,656
 $1,946
 1.4 %
Income tax expense 32,023
 33,566
 (1,543) (4.6)% 33,566
 31,413
 2,153
 6.9 %
Net income $106,402
 $109,036
 $(2,634) (2.4)% $109,036
 $109,243
 $(207) (0.2)%
Effective tax rate 23.1% 23.5% 

   23.5% 22.3% 

  

In comparison to fiscal year 2012, the decrease in the effective tax rate for fiscal year 2013 was due primarily to the increased benefit from the U.S. federal research tax credit in fiscal 2013 offset by a smaller proportion of income earned in foreign jurisdictions that is taxed at lower rates. The U.S. federal research tax credit was reinstated in January 2013 retroactively to January 1, 2012; therefore, the fiscal year 2013 effective tax rate includes the impact of the credit earned in our fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to the benefit of the credit for only three quarters in fiscal 2012.

In comparison to fiscal year 2011, the increase in the effective tax rate for fiscal year 2012 was due primarily to the reduced benefit from the U.S. federal research tax credit as the credit expired in December 2011; therefore, the effective tax rate in fiscal year 2012 included the benefit of the credit for only three quarters. The effective tax rate for fiscal year 2011 includes the impact of credits earned in our fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010 because the credit was reinstated in December 2010 retroactively to January 2010.

In comparison to fiscal year 2010, the decrease in the effective tax rate for fiscal year 2011 was due primarily to the increased benefit from the U.S. federal research tax credit.

Our effective tax rate for fiscal yearyears 2013, 2012, 2011 and 20102011 differs from the statutory rate due to the impact of foreign operations taxed at different statutory rates, income tax credits, state taxes, and other factors.  Our future tax rate could be impacted by a shift in the mix of domestic and foreign income, tax treaties with foreign jurisdictions, changes in tax laws in the U.S. or internationally, or a change in estimate of future taxable income, which could result in a valuation allowance being required.

AsOn January 2, 2013, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of March2012, which included a provision that retroactively extended the federal tax research credit to January 1, 2012 for two years, was signed into law. We recognized an approximate $1.8 million discrete tax benefit in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2013 for the previously expired period from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012, we2012.

We had $11.1$11.1 million of unrecognized tax benefits as of March 31, 2013 and 2012compared to $10.5$10.5 million as of March 31, 2011 and $11.2 million as of March 31, 2010.. The unrecognized tax benefits as of the end of fiscal year 20122013 would favorably impact the effective tax rate in future periods if recognized.


36



It is our continuing practice to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. As of March 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010,2013, we had approximately $1.7$2.0 million of accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions.positions, compared to $1.7 million as of March 31, 2012 and 2011. No penalties have been accrued.
  
Although the timing and outcome of income tax audits is highly uncertain, it is possible that certain unrecognized tax benefits may be reduced as a result of the lapse of the applicable statutes of limitations in federal, state, and foreign jurisdictions within the next twelve months.  Currently, we cannot reasonably estimate the amount of reductions, if any, during the next twelve months.  Any such reduction could be impacted by other changes in unrecognized tax benefits.

We and our subsidiaries are subject to taxation in various foreign and state jurisdictions, as well as inincluding the U.S. We are no longer subject to U.S. federal tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2009. We are under examination by the Internal Revenue Service for our 2010 tax year and the California Franchise Tax Board for our 2007 and 2008 tax years. Foreign income tax matters for material tax jurisdictions have been concluded for tax years prior to fiscal year 2006, except for the United Kingdom for which hastax matters have been concluded for tax years prior to fiscal year 2010.

Discontinued Operations

We entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (“APA”) on October 2, 2009, as subsequently amended, to sell Altec Lansing, our AEG segment.  The sale was completed effective December 1, 2009.  All of the revenues in the AEG segment were derived from sales of Altec Lansing products.  All operations of AEG have been classified as discontinued operations in the Consolidated statement of operations for all periods presented.

There was no income or loss from discontinued operations for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. The results from discontinued operations for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 were as follows (in thousands):

Net revenues $64,916
 
Cost of revenues (53,127) 
Operating expenses (16,433) 
Impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets (25,194) 
Restructuring and other related charges (19) 
Loss on sale of AEG (611) 
Loss from operations of discontinued AEG segment (including loss on sale of AEG) (30,468) 
Tax benefit from discontinued operations (11,393) 
Loss on discontinued operations, net of tax $(19,075) 

In addition, the results from discontinued operations in fiscal year 2010 included a loss of $0.6 million on sale of Altec Lansing, which is calculated as follows (in thousands):
Proceeds received upon close$11,075
Escrow payments received to date2,065
Remaining escrow payments to be received (subsequently received in fiscal 2011)1,625
Payment to purchaser for adjustment for final value of net assets under APA(3,956)
Total estimated proceeds10,809
Book value of net assets sold(11,057)
Costs incurred upon closing(363)
Loss on sale of AEG$(611)
2012.



37


FINANCIAL CONDITION

The following table below provides selected consolidatedsummarizes our cash flow informationflows from operating, investing, and financing activities for each of the periods indicated:past three fiscal years:

(in thousands) March 31, 2012 March 31, 2011 March 31, 2010
Cash provided by operating activities $140,448
 $158,232
 $143,729
       
Capital expenditures and other assets $(19,140) $(18,667) $(6,262)
Cash provided by maturities and sales of investments, net of investment purchases 9,725
 (168,937) 64,760
Proceeds received from sale of AEG segment 
 1,625
 9,121
Cash provided by other investing activities 
 9,066
 277
Cash (used for) provided by investing activities $(9,415) $(176,913) $67,896
       
Repurchase of common stock, including equity forward contract $(273,791) $(105,522) $(49,652)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock 38,222
 50,109
 32,581
Net proceeds from revolving line of credit 37,000
 
 
Payment of cash dividends (9,040)
 (9,703)
 (9,781)
Cash provided by other financing activities 9,348
 9,939
 5,870
Cash used for financing activities $(198,261) $(55,177) $(20,982)
(in thousands) Fiscal Year Ended March 31, Change
Total cash provided by (used for): 2013 2012 2011 2013 vs. 2012 2012 vs. 2011
Operating activities $125,501
 $140,448
 $158,232
 $(14,947) $(17,784)
Investing activities (58,928) (9,415) (176,913) (49,513) 167,498
Financing activities (46,463) (198,261) (55,371) 151,798
 (142,890)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents (669) (810) 1,464
 141
 (2,274)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents $19,441
 $(68,038) $(72,588)    

Cash ProvidedWe use cash provided by operating activities as our primary source of liquidity. We expect that cash provided by operating activities will fluctuate in future periods as a result of a number of factors, including fluctuations in our revenues, the timing of product shipments during the quarter, accounts receivable collections, inventory and supply chain management, and the timing and amount of tax and other payments. 

Operating Activities
 
CashNet cash provided by operating activities during the year ended March 31, 2013 decreased from the prior year due to the following:

A decrease in net income
An increase in current accounts receivable related to higher net revenues in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2013 compared with the same prior year quarter
An increase in inventories related primarily to last-time buys from one of our primary chip suppliers

These decreases were partially offset by an increase in accrued liabilities resulting primarily from higher accruals for performance-based compensation in fiscal year 2013 due to higher achievement against targets than in fiscal year 2012.

Net cash provided by operating activities during the year ended March 31, 2012 decreased from the year ended March 31, 2011 due to the following:

An increase in accounts receivable resulting from the timing of revenues earned during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2012 compared with the same prior year quarter
A decrease in accrued liabilities due primarily to lower accruals for performance-based compensation in fiscal year 2012 was $140.4 million and consisted of net income of $109.0 million, non-cash charges of $25.9 million and working capital sources of cash of $5.5 million. Non-cash charges consisted primarily of $17.5 million of stock-based compensation expense, $13.8 million of depreciation and amortization and a $5.6 million income tax benefit associated with stock option exercises,due to lower achievement against targets than in fiscal year 2011

These decreases were partially offset in part by a $9.1 million benefit from deferred income taxes and $7.0 million in excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation expense. Working capital sources of cash consisted primarily of an$18.5 million net increase in accrued income taxes due to refunds received in fiscal year 2012 related to over-payments made in fiscal year 2011 and the timing of current year income tax accruals, partly offset by a $9.4 million increase in accounts receivable and a $4.3 million decrease in accrued liabilities. Inventory turns increased to 6.1 as of March 31, 2012 from 5.8 as of March 31, 2011 as a result of lower inventory balances on higher cost of revenues in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2012 compared to the same period in fiscal year 2011 due to better inventory management. Days Sales Outstanding ("DSO") increased to 57 days as of March 31, 2012 from 54 days as of March 31, 2011, resulting from a higher accounts receivable balance due to timing of revenues earned during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2012 as compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011. The net decrease in accrued liabilities resulted primarily from the payout in fiscal year 2012 of performance-based compensation related to fiscal year 2011 and lower accruals for performance-based compensation in fiscal year 2012 due to lower achievement of targets than in fiscal year 2011.

Cash provided by operating activities in fiscal year 2011 was $158.2 million and consisted of net income of $109.2 million, non-cash charges of $29.1 million and working capital sources of cash of $19.9 million. Non-cash charges consisted primarily of $16.3 million of depreciation and amortization, $15.9 million of stock-based compensation expense and a $6.2 million income tax benefit associated with stock option exercises, offset in part by $5.7 million in excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation expense and a $5.2 million benefit from deferred income taxes. Working capital sources of cash consisted primarily of a decrease in inventory of $13.0 million as we continued to improve the management of our inventory levels, increases in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $10.2 million and $9.9 million, respectively, due to timing of payments along with an increase in income taxes of $4.2 million. Working capital uses of cash consisted primarily of an increase in accounts receivable of $15.1 million due to higher revenues in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011 than in the prior year quarter. Inventory turns, which is calculated using Cost of revenues from continuing operations only and consolidated inventory balances, increased to 5.8 as of March 31, 2011 from 4.2 as of March 31, 2010 as a result of our lower inventory balances on higher cost of revenues in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011 compared to the same period in fiscal year 2010. DSO, which is calculated using Net revenues from continuing operations only and consolidated accounts receivable balances, increased to 54 days as of March 31, 2011 from 49 days as of March 31, 2010 as a result of higher accounts receivable balance due to timing of revenues earned during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011 as compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010.accruals.


3837


Cash provided by operating activities in fiscal year 2010 was $143.7 million and consisted of net income of $57.4 million, non-cash charges of $54.3 million and working capital sources of cash of $32.0 million.  Non-cash charges consisted primarily of $25.2 million related to the AEG impairment charge on long-lived assets recorded in discontinued operations, $18.1 million of depreciation and amortization, $14.6 million of stock-based compensation expense, and non-cash restructuring charges of $6.3 million offset in part by a $12.5 million benefit from deferred income taxes.  Working capital sources of cash consisted primarily of a decrease in inventory of $27.6 million as we continued to improve the management of our inventory levels, income tax refunds received and decreases in other assets.  Working capital uses of cash consisted primarily of decreases in accounts payable and accrued liabilities from reduced spending during the fiscal year as a result of the sale of Altec Lansing in December 2009.  Inventory turns, which is calculated using Cost of revenues from continuing operations only and consolidated inventory balances, increased to 4.2 as of March 31, 2010 from 3.1 as of March 31, 2009 as a result of our lower inventory balances on higher revenues in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to the same period in fiscal year 2009.  Accounts receivable remained relatively flat from fiscal year 2009 to fiscal year 2010; however, DSO, which is calculated using Net revenues from continuing operations only and consolidated accounts receivable balances, decreased to 49 days as of March 31, 2010 from 59 days as of March 31, 2009 as a result of collections of the accounts receivable related to our AEG business which were retained by us upon the sale of Altec Lansing on December 1, 2009.  

We expect that cash provided by operating activities may fluctuate in future periods as a result of a number of factors including fluctuations in our net revenues and operating results, collection of accounts receivable, changes to inventory levels and timing of payments.
Cash Used for Investing Activities
 
In fiscal year 2012, netNet cash used for investing activities was $9.4 million, consistingduring the year ended March 31, 2013 increased from the year ended March 31, 2012 due to the following:

An increase in net cash used for purchases of short- and long-term investments
An increase in capital expenditures related primarily of $176.9 million and $91.0 million forto the purchase of short-terma new manufacturing facility in Tijuana, Mexico and long-term investments, respectively, along with capital expenditurescosts incurred to commence implementation of $19.1 million. These usesa new enterprise resource planning ("ERP") system
The acquisition of cash were offsetall the equity interests in part by net proceeds of $277.6 million from salesTonalite B.V. ("Tonalite"), a product and maturities of short-termdesign company specializing in wireless wearable products and long-term investments. Capital expenditures during fiscal year 2012 related primarily to building and leasehold improvements, tooling and various IT projects and equipment.miniaturization technology

In fiscal year 2011, netNet cash used for investing activities was $169.9 million, consisting primarily of $256.3 million and $48.9 million forduring the purchase of short-term and long-term investments, respectively, along with capital expenditures of $18.6 million. These uses of cash were offset in part by net proceeds of $142.5 million from sales and maturities of short-term investments, $9.1 millionyear ended March 31, 2012 decreased from the sale of Assets held for sale and $1.6 million in net proceeds from the release of escrow relatedyear ended March 31, 2011 due to the sale of Altec Lansing, our AEG segment. Capital expenditures during fiscal year 2011 related primarily to building and leasehold improvements, including the installation of an expanded solar energy system in our headquarters in Santa Cruz, California, tooling and various IT projects and equipment.

In fiscal year 2010, net cash provided by investing activities was $67.9 million, consisting primarily of net maturities and sales of short-term investments of $64.0 million and $9.1 millionincrease in net proceeds from the sale and maturity of Altec Lansing,short-term investments. This decrease was partially offset by the following:

An increase in part by capital expendituresnet cash used for purchases of $6.3 million.  Capital expenditures during fiscal year 2010 related primarily to toolinglong-term investments
A decrease in proceeds from the sale of property, plant and various IT projects.equipment

We anticipate our capital expenditures in fiscal year 20132014 to range from $51.0$48.0 million to $54.0$52.0 million. The increase from fiscal year 20122013 is primarily related to continued costs associated with the potential purchase and related construction of a new manufacturing facility in Mexico that would replace and consolidate our existing leased facilities.Mexico. The estimated cost of theremaining costs associated with this facility includes the purchase of an existing building,include solar upgrades, labs, and other building furnishings, including furniture and fixtures. If we complete the purchase of the facility in the first half of fiscal year 2013, weWe expect to complete the required upgrades and to move into the new facility in the first quarter of fiscal year 2014. In addition,As part of this move, we would not renew our existing leases and will consolidate all of our operations into the new facility. As a result of purchasing the building, we would record significant non-cash charges, including approximately $2.0 million in accelerated depreciation related to the remaining useful lives of the leasehold improvements and, once we stop using the leased facilities,recognize a one-time lease charge of approximately $2.0 million, representing the costs we would otherwise continue to incur under the original lease terms. In addition toterms of the potential new facility in Mexico,leased facilities we plan to migrate to avacate when we move into the new enterprise resource planning ("ERP") environment, with capital expenditures commencingfacility. We will also recognize one-time lease charge in the second halffirst quarter of fiscal year 2013 and continuing through2014 of approximately $1.0 million when we exit a leased facility at our Corporate headquarters, which is part of the restructuring program we commenced in the third quarter of fiscal year 2013. In addition, we will continue to incur costs related to the implementation of a new ERP system, which we expect to place in service at the start of our fiscal year 2015. The remainder of the anticipated capital expenditures for fiscal year 20132014 consists primarily of building and leasehold improvements inat our U.S. headquarters, other IT relatedIT-related expenditures, and tooling for new products. We will continue to evaluate new business opportunities and new markets; as a result, our future growth within the existing business or new opportunities and markets may dictate the need for additional facilities and capital expenditures to support that growth.


39


Cash Used for Financing Activities 
 
Net cash used for financing activities during the year ended March 31, 2013 decreased from the year ended March 31, 2012 due to a decrease in the level of common stock repurchases, driven by our participation in accelerated share repurchase ("ASR") agreements in fiscal year 2012 that did not recur in fiscal year 2013. This decrease was $198.3 million and consisted of $273.8 millionpartially offset by the following:

An increase in net cash used for the repurchase of common stock and $9.0 million for dividend payments, offset in part by $37.0 million in proceeds fromto repay all outstanding amounts due under our revolving line of credit net of principal payments, $38.2 million
A decrease in proceeds from theemployees' exercise of employee stock options$7.0 million of excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation and $4.9 million
An increase in proceedscash dividend payments, resulting from the saledoubling of treasury stock issued for purchases under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”).per share cash dividend amounts over prior years

Net cash used for financing activities during the year ended March 31, 2012 increased over the year ended March 31, 2011 due to the following:

An increase in fiscal year 2011 was $55.4 million and consisted of $105.5 million used for the repurchaselevel of common stock and $9.7 millionrepurchases, resulting from our participation in dividend payments,ASR agreements
A decrease in proceeds from employees' exercise of stock options

These increases were partially offset by $50.1 million innet proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options, $4.2 million in proceeds from the sale of treasury stock issued for purchasesreceived under our ESPP and $5.7 millionrevolving line of excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation.

Net cash used for financing activities in fiscal year 2010 was $21.0 million and consisted of $49.7 million related to repurchases of common stock and $9.8 million in dividend payments, partially offset by $32.6 million in proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options, $3.6 million in proceeds from the sale of treasury stock issued for purchases under our ESPP and $2.2 million of excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation.credit.

On May 1, 2012,7, 2013, we announced that our Board of Directors ("the Board") had declared a cash dividend of $0.10 per share of our common stock, payable on June 8, 201210, 2013 to stockholders of record at the close of business on May 18, 2012.  This represents a doubling of the per share cash dividend amount in comparison to historical levels.20, 2013.  We expect to continue paying a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share of our common stock; however, the actual declaration of dividends and the establishment of record and payment dates are subject to final determination by the Audit Committee of the Board each quarter after its review of our financial performance and financial position.


38


Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
Our primary discretionary cash uses have historically been for repurchases of our common stock.  At March 31, 20122013, we had working capital of $463.0 million, including $345.4 million of cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments, compared to working capital of $438.0 million, including $334.5 million of cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments compared to working capital of $524.1 million, including $430.0 million of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments at March 31, 20112012.  The decreaseincrease in working capital at March 31, 20122013 compared to March 31, 2011 is a result of2012 results from the decreaseincrease in cash and cash equivalents due primarily to significant payments for repurchasesa lower volume of our common stock repurchases during the fiscal year ended March 31, 20122013, which were funded primarily from cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments on hand at March 31, 2011 and from net borrowings under our revolving line of credit..

Our cash and cash equivalents as of March 31, 20122013 consist of Commercial Paper, U.S. Treasury Bills, and bank deposits with third party financial institutions.  We monitor bank balances in our operating accounts and adjust the balances as appropriate.  Cash balances are held throughout the world, including substantial amounts held outside of the U.S.   As of March 31, 20122013, of our $334.5345.4 million of cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments, $11.625.2 million is held domestically while $322.9320.2 million is held by foreign subsidiaries. The costs to repatriate our foreign earnings to the U.S. would likely be material; however, our intent is to permanently reinvest our earnings from foreign operations, and our current plans do not require us to repatriate them to fund our U.S. operations as we generate sufficient domestic operating cash flow and have access to external funding under our current revolving line of credit. For information regarding tax considerations surrounding the undistributed earnings of our foreign operations, refer to Note 17, Income Taxes, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-K.

Our investments are intended to establish a high-quality portfolio that preserves principal and meets liquidity needs.  As of March 31, 2012,2013, our investments are composed of U.S. Treasury Bills, Government Agency Securities, Commercial Paper, U.S. Corporate Bonds, and Certificates of Deposit ("CDs").

From time to time, our Board authorizes programs under which we may repurchase shares of our common stock, depending on market conditions, in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions, including accelerated share repurchase ("ASR")ASR agreements. During the fiscal years ended March 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010,2011, we repurchased 8,027,287751,706, 3,315,0008,027,287 and 1,935,1003,315,000 shares, respectively, of our common stock as part of these publicly announced repurchase programs for a total cost of $273.823.9 million, $105.5273.8 million million, and $49.7105.5 million million,, respectively. In addition, we withheld 74,73293,206 shares valued at $2.63.0 million during the fiscal year ended March 31, 20122013, compared to 74,732 shares valued at $2.6 million in fiscal year 2012 and an immaterial amount in fiscal year 2011 and none in fiscal year 2010,, in satisfaction of employee tax withholding obligations upon the vesting of restricted stock granted under our stock plans.


40


As of March 31, 20122013, there were a total of 633,613881,907 remaining shares authorized for repurchase, all of which are under our program approved by the Board of Directors on March 8,August 6, 2012. Refer to Note 13,12, Common Stock Repurchases, of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-K for more information regarding our stock repurchase programs.

On January 2, 2013, December 28, 2011, and December 7, 2010, and December 2, 2009, we retired5,398,376, 5,000,000, 4,000,000and 2,000,0004,000,000 shares of treasury stock, respectively, which were returned to the status of authorized but unissued shares.  These were non-cash equity transactions inunder which the cost of the reacquired shares was recorded as a reduction to both Retainedretained earnings and Treasurytreasury stock.

In May 2011, we entered into a Credit Agreement ("Credit Agreement") with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association ("the Bank"), as most recently amended in May 2013 to extend its term to May 2016 ( "Bank"as amended, "the Credit Agreement") which. The Credit Agreement provides for a $100.0 million unsecured revolving line of credit (the "line("the line of credit") to augment our financial flexibility to facilitate the ASR Program and, if requested by us, the Bank may increase its commitment thereunder by up to $100.0 million, for a total facility of up to $200.0 million.  Principal,Any outstanding principal, together with accrued and unpaid interest, is due on the amended maturity date of May 9, 20142016 and our obligations under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by our domestic subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions. As of March 31, 20122013, we had no outstanding borrowings of $37.0 million under the line of credit. Loans under the Credit Agreement bear interest at theour election of the Company (1) at the Bank's announced prime rate less 1.50% per annum, (2) at a daily one month LIBOR rate plus 1.10% per annum, or (3) at an adjusted LIBOR rate, for a term of one, three or six months, plus 1.10% per annum. The line of credit requires us to comply with the following two financial covenant ratios, in each case at each fiscal quarter end and determined on a rolling four-quarter basis:

maximumMaximum ratio of funded debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA"); and,
minimumMinimum EBITDA coverage ratio, which is calculated as interest payments divided by EBITDA.EBITDA

As of March 31, 2012, weWe were in compliance with these financial covenant ratios by a substantial margin.as of March 31, 2013.


39


In addition, we and our subsidiaries are required to maintain, on a consolidated basis, unrestricted cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities plus availability under the Credit Agreement at the end of each fiscal quarter of at least $200.0 million. The line of credit contains affirmative covenants, including covenants regarding the payment of taxes and other liabilities, maintenance of insurance, reporting requirements, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. The line of credit facility also contains negative covenants, among other things, limiting our ability to incur debt, make capital expenditures, grant liens, make acquisitions, and make investments. The events of default under the line of credit include payment defaults, cross defaults with certain other indebtedness, breaches of covenants, judgment defaults, and bankruptcy and insolvency events involving us or any of our subsidiaries. As of March 31, 20122013, we were in compliance with all covenants under the line of credit.

We enter into foreign currency forward-exchange contracts, which typically mature in one month intervals, to hedge our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations of Euro, Great Britain Pound and Australian Dollar denominated cash, receivables and payables balances.  We record the fair value of our forward-exchange contracts in the Consolidated balance sheets at each reporting period and record any fair value adjustments in our Consolidated statements of operations.  Gains and losses associated with currency rate changes on contracts are recorded within Interest and other income (expense), net in our Consolidated statements of operations, offsetting transaction gains and losses on the related assets and liabilities.  Please see Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, for additional information.

We also have a hedging program to hedge a portion of forecasted revenues denominated in the Euro and Great Britain Pound with put and call option contracts used as collars.  We also hedge a portion of the forecasted expenditures in Mexican Pesos with a cross-currency swap.  At each reporting period, we record the net fair value of our unrealized option contracts in the Consolidated balance sheets with related unrealized gains and losses as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive income, a separate element of Stockholders’ equity.  Gains and losses associated with realized option contracts and swap contracts are recorded within Net revenues and Cost of revenues, respectively, in our Consolidated statements of operations.  Please see Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, for additional information.

Our liquidity, capital resources, and results of operations in any period could be affected by repurchases of our common stock, the exercise of outstanding stock options, restricted stock grants to employeesunder stock plans, and the issuance of common stock under our ESPP.  Theemployee stock purchase plan ("ESPP").  We receive cash from the exercise of outstanding stock options and the issuance of shares under our ESPP; however, the resulting increase in the number of outstanding shares from these equity grants and issuances could affect our earnings per share; however, weshare. We cannot predict the timing or amount of proceeds from the sale or exercise of these securities or whether they will be exercised, at all. forfeited, or expire unexercised.

WeBased on past performance and current expectations, we believe that our current cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, cash provided by operations, and the availability of additional funds under the Credit Agreement will be sufficient to fundsupport business operations, capital expenditures, contractual obligations, and other liquidity requirements associated with our operations for at least the next twelve months; however,months. However, any projections of future financial needs and sources of working capital are subject to uncertainty.  See “Certain Forward-Looking Information” and “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for factors that could affect our estimates for future financial needs and sources of working capital.

41



OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS AND CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
 
We have not entered into any transactions with unconsolidated entities whereby we have financial guarantees, subordinated retained interests, derivative instruments, or other contingent arrangements that expose us to material continuing risks, contingent liabilities, or any other obligation under a variable interest in an unconsolidated entity that provides us with financing and liquidity support, or market risk, or credit risk supportsupport.

A substantial portion of the raw materials, components, and subassemblies used in our products are provided by our suppliers on a consignment basis. These consigned inventories are not recorded on our consolidated balance sheet until we take possession of and title to the Company.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONSraw materials, components, and subassemblies, which occurs when they are consumed in the production process. Prior to consumption in the production process, our suppliers bear the risk of loss and retain title to the consigned inventory. Consigned inventory not consumed in the production process is returnable to our suppliers in accordance with the terms of our agreements with them. If our suppliers were to discontinue financing consigned inventory, it would require us to make cash outlays and we could incur expenses, including write-downs for excess and obsolete inventory, which, if material, could negatively affect our business and financial results. As of March 31, 2013 and 2012, we had off-balance sheet consigned inventories of $31.3 million and $24.7 million, respectively.
 
The following table summarizes theour future contractual obligations that we were reasonably likely to incur as of March 31, 20122013 and the effect that such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods.periods:

 Payments Due by Period Payments Due by Period
(in thousands) Total Less than 1 year 1-3 years 3-5 years More than 5 years Total Less than 1 year 1-3 years 4-5 years More than 5 years
Revolving line of credit $37,000
 $
 $37,000
 $
 $
Operating leases 13,210
 5,355
 6,041
 1,128
 686
 $10,878
 $4,686
 $3,247
 $1,377
 $1,568
Unconditional purchase obligations 58,323
 58,323
 
 
 
 182,460
 182,231
 229
 
 
Total contractual cash obligations $108,533
 $63,678
 $43,041
 $1,128
 $686
 $193,338
 $186,917
 $3,476
 $1,377
 $1,568

Operating Leases

We lease certain facilities under operating leases expiring through our fiscal year 2022. Certain of these leases provide for renewal options for periods ranging from one to three years and in the normal course of business, we exercise the renewal options.


40


Unconditional Purchase Obligations

We utilize several contract manufacturers to manufacture raw materials, components, and subassemblies for our products. We provide these contract manufacturers with demand information that typically covers periods up to 270 days, and they use this information to acquire components and build products. We also obtain individual components for our products from a wide variety of individual suppliers. Consistent with industry practice, we acquire components through a combination of purchase orders, supplier contracts, and open orders based on projected demand information. As of March 31, 2013, we had outstanding off-balance sheet third-party manufacturing commitments and component purchase commitments of $182.5 million, all of which we expect to consume in the normal course of business.

Unrecognized Tax Benefits

As of March 31, 2012, the2013, long-term income taxes payable reported on our consolidated balance sheet included unrecognized tax benefits and related interest under the Income Tax Topic of the FASB ASC were $11.1$11.1 million and $1.7$2.0 million respectively, and are included in Long-term income taxes payable in our Consolidated balance sheet., respectively.  We are unable to reliably estimate the timing of future payments related to unrecognized tax benefits and they are not included in the contractual obligations table above.  We do not anticipate any material cash payments associated with our unrecognized tax benefits to be made within the next twelve months.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
 
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP"). In connection with the preparation of our financial statements, we are required to make assumptions and estimates about future events, and apply judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses and the related disclosures. We base our assumptions, estimates and judgments on historical experience, current trends, future expectations and other factors that management believes to be relevant at the time our consolidated financial statements are prepared. On a regularan ongoing basis, we review the accounting policies, assumptions, estimates and judgments to ensure that our consolidated financial statements are presented fairly and in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Because future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, actual results could differ from our assumptions and estimates, and such differences could be material.

Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We believe the following accounting estimates are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results, and they require our most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, resulting from the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. We have reviewed these critical accounting estimates and related disclosures with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.




Revenue Recognition and Related Allowances



Inventory Valuation



Product Warranty Obligations



Income Taxes
Revenue Recognition and Related Allowances
Inventory Valuation
Product Warranty Obligations
Income Taxes


42


Revenue Recognition and Related Allowances
 
We sell substantially all of our products directly to customers andend users through other distribution channels, including distributors, retailers, carriers, and original equipment manufacturers ("OEMs"). Commercial distributors and retailers represent our largest sources of net revenues. Sales through our distribution and retail channels are made primarily under agreements allowing for rights of return and include various sales incentive programs, such as rebates, advertising, price protection, and other sales incentives. We have an established sales history for these arrangements and we record the estimated reserves and allowances at the time the related revenue is recognized. Customer sales returns are estimated based on historical data, relevant current data, and the monitoring of inventory build-up in the distribution channel. The primary factors affecting our reserve for estimated customer sales returns include the general timing of historical returns and estimated return rates. The allowance for sales incentive programs is based on historical experience and contractual terms in the form of lump sum payments or sell-through credits. Future market conditions and product transitions may require us to take actions to increase customer incentive offerings, possibly resulting in an incremental reduction of revenue at the time the incentive is offered. Additionally, certain incentive programs require us to estimate, based on historical experience, the specific terms and conditions of the incentive and the estimated number of customers that will actually redeem the incentive.


41


We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology we use to measure sales return reserves or incentive allowances during the past three fiscal years. Substantially all credits associated with these activities are processed within the following fiscal year, and therefore, do not require subjective long-term estimates; however, if actual results are not consistent with the assumptions and estimates used, we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material. If we increased our estimate as of March 31, 20122013 by a hypothetical 10%, our sales returns reserve and sales incentive allowance would have increased by approximately $0.8$0.9 million and $1.3$1.4 million, respectively. Net of the estimated value of the inventory that would be returned, this would have decreased gross profit and net income by approximately $1.7$1.8 million and $1.3$1.4 million, respectively.

When a sales arrangement contains multiple elements, such as hardware and software products and/or services, we allocate revenue to each element based on relative selling prices. The selling price for a deliverable is based on its vendor specific objective evidence ("VSOE"), if available, third party evidence ("TPE") if VSOE is not available, or estimated selling price ("ESP") if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. In multiple element arrangements where more-than-incidental software deliverables are included, we allocate revenue to each separate unit of accounting for each of the non-software deliverables and to the software deliverables as a group using the relative selling prices of each of the deliverables in the arrangement based on the aforementioned selling price hierarchy. Revenue recognized for the software portion of multiple element arrangements was less than 1% of total net revenues for the years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012. As of March 31, 2013 and 2012, total deferred revenue related to the software portion of multiple-element arrangements was $3.1 million and $1.6 million, respectively.

Inventory Valuation

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market.  The Company writes down inventories that have become obsolete or are in excess of anticipated demand or net realizable value. Our estimate of write downs for excess and obsolete inventory areis based on a detailed analysis of on-hand inventory and purchase commitments in excess of forecasted demand. Our products require long-lead time parts available from a limited number of vendors and, occasionally, last-time buys of raw materials for products with long lifecycles. The effects of demand variability, long-lead times, and last-time buys have historically contributed to inventory write-downs.  Our demand forecast considers projected future shipments, market conditions, inventory on hand, purchase commitments, product development plans and product life cycle, inventory on consignment, and other competitive factors.  Refer to "Off Balance Sheet Arrangements" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional details regarding consigned inventories.

We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology we use to estimate our inventory write-downs or adverse purchase commitments during the past three fiscal years. If the demand or market conditions for our products are less favorable than forecasted or if unforeseen technological changes negatively impact the utility of our inventory, we may be required to record additional inventory write-downs or adverse purchase commitments, which would negatively affect our results of operations in the period the write-downs or adverse purchase commitments were recorded. If we increased our estimateinventory reserve and adverse purchase commitment reserve estimates as of March 31, 20122013 by a hypothetical 10%, our inventorythe reserves and cost of revenues would have each increased by approximately $0.6$0.5 million and our net income would have been reduced by approximately $0.4 million.

Product Warranty Obligations

The Company records a liability for the estimated costs of warranties at the time the related revenue is recognized. Factors that affect the warranty obligation include product failure rates, estimated return rates, material usage, and service related costs incurred in correcting product failures. If actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material. If we increased our warranty obligation estimate as of March 31, 20122013 by a hypothetical 10%, our warranty obligation and the associated cost of revenues would have each increased by approximately $1.3 million and our net income would have been reduced by approximately $1.0 million.

Income Taxes

We account for income taxes under an asset and liability approach that requires the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the book and tax bases of assets and liabilities to be recognized as deferred tax assets and liabilities.  Valuation allowances are established to reduce deferred tax assets when, based on available objective evidence, it is more likely than not that the benefit of such assets will not be realized.


43


We are subject to income taxes in the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions and our income tax returns like those of most companies, are periodically audited by domestic and foreign tax authorities. These audits may include questions regarding our tax filing positions, including the timing and amount of deductions and the allocation of income among various tax jurisdictions. At any one time, multiple tax years may be subject to audit by the various tax authorities. In evaluating the exposures associated with our various tax filing positions, we record a liability for such exposures. A number of years may elapse before a particular matter for which we have established a liability is audited and fully resolved or clarified.


42


We recognize the impact of an uncertain income tax position on income tax expense at the largest amount that is more-likely-than-not to be sustained.  An unrecognized tax benefit will not be recognized unless it has a greater than 50% likelihood of being sustained. We adjust our tax liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the period in which an uncertain tax position is effectively settled, the statute of limitations expires for the relevant taxing authority to examine the tax position, or when more information becomes available. We recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters as part of our provision for income taxes.

Our liability for unrecognized tax benefits contains uncertainties because management is required to make assumptions and apply judgment to estimate the exposures associated with our various filing positions. Our effective income tax rate is also affected by changes in tax law, the level of earnings and the results of tax audits.

Our provision for income taxes does not include provisions for U.S. income taxes and foreign withholding taxes associated with the repatriation of undistributed earnings of certain foreign operations that we intend to reinvest indefinitely in the foreign operations. If these earnings were distributed to the U.S. in the form of dividends or otherwise, we would be subject to additional U.S. income taxes, subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits, and foreign withholding taxes. Our current plans do not require repatriation of earnings from foreign operations to fund the U.S. operations because we generate sufficient domestic operating cash flow and have access to external funding under our line of credit. As a result, we do not expect a material impact on our business or financial flexibility with respect to undistributed earnings of our foreign operations.

Although we believe that our judgments and estimates are reasonable, actual results could differ and we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material.

To the extent we prevail in matters for which a liability has been established, or are required to pay amounts in excess of our established liability, our effective income tax rate in a given financial statement period could be materially affected. An unfavorable tax settlement would generally require use of our cash and may result in an increase in our effective income tax rate in the period of resolution. A favorable tax settlement would be recognized as a reduction in our effective income tax rate in the period of resolution.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Recently Adopted Pronouncements

In September 2011,February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB"(“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2011-08, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment. This ASU allows entities to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not (that is, a likelihoodamended its guidance on the presentation of more than 50 percent) thatcomprehensive income. Under the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If this is the case, the entity is required to perform a more detailed two-step goodwill impairment test that is used to identify potential goodwill impairment and to measure the amount of goodwill impairment losses, if any, to be recognized. We adopted ASU 2011-08 in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2012 and it did not have an impact on our financial statements. Refer to Note 8, Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-K for details of our goodwill impairment analysis.

Recently Issued Pronouncements

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. This ASU requiresamended guidance, an entity to disclose both net and grossmust present information about assets and liabilities that have been offset, if any, and the related arrangements. The disclosures under this new guidance are required to be provided retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. We are required to implement this guidance effective for the first quarter of fiscal year 2014. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2011-11 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), Presentation of Comprehensive Income, as amended, which requires us to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. Certain of the provisions are effective for the us in the first quarter of fiscal year 2013 and will be applied retrospectively.

44


We intend to presentregarding reclassification adjustments from accumulated other comprehensive income in two separatea single note or on the face of the financial statements. This is required for both annual and consecutive statements.interim reporting. We elected to adopt this guidance during the quarter ended March 31, 2013.

ITEM 7A.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
 
The following discusses our exposure to market risk related to changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates.  This discussion contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties.  Actual results could vary materially as a result of a number of factors, including those set forth in Item 1A, Risk Factors.
 
INTEREST RATE AND MARKET RISK
 
As of March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, we reported the following balances in cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, and long-term investments:

 March 31, March 31,
(in millions) 2012 2011
(in thousands) 2013 2012
Cash and cash equivalents $209.3
 $277.4
 $228,776
 $209,335
Short-term investments 125.2
 152.6
 $116,581
 $125,177
Long-term investments 55.3
 39.3
 $80,261
 $55,347

As of March 31, 20122013, our investments were composed of U.S. Treasury Bills, Government Agency Securities, Commercial Paper, and U.S. Corporate Bonds, and CDs.Certificates of Deposit ("CDs").


43


Our investment policy and strategy are focused on preservation of capital and supporting our liquidity requirements. A portion of our cash is managed by external managers within the guidelines of our investment policy. Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our investment portfolio. We typically invest in highly rated securities and ourOur investment policy generally limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer. Our investment policyissuer and requires investments to be high credit quality, primarily rated A or A2 and above, with the objective of minimizing the potential risk of principal loss. All highly liquid investments with initial maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase are classified as cash equivalents. We classify our investments as either short-term or long-term based on each instrument's underlying effective maturity date. All short-term investments have effective maturities less than 12 months, while all long-term investments have effective maturities greater than 12 months or we do not currently have the ability to liquidate the investment.investments. We may sell our investments prior to their stated maturities for strategic purposes, in anticipation of credit deterioration, or for duration management. We recognized noNo material realized or unrealized net gains or losses were recognized during the years ended March 31, 20122013 and 2011.2012.

Interest rates in general were relatively unchanged in the year ended March 31, 20122013 compared to the prior year; however, we earned slightly greater interest income due to a higher average investment portfolio in fiscal year 2012 compared with the prior year. During the year ended March 31, 20122013, we generated approximately $1.5$1.3 million inof interest income from our portfolio of cash equivalents and investments, compared to an immaterial amount$1.5 million in fiscal year 2011.2012. During the years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, we did not incur a significant amount of interest expense from outstanding balances under our revolving line of credit. A hypothetical increase or decrease in our interest rates by 10 basis points would have a minimal impact on our interest income.income or expense.
 
FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE RISK

We are exposed to currency fluctuations, primarily in the Euro ("EUR"), Great Britain Pound ("GBP"), Australian Dollar ("AUD") and the, Mexican Peso ("MX$"), and the Chinese Renminbi ("RMB"). We use a hedging strategy to diminish, and make more predictable, the effect of currency fluctuations. All of our hedging activities are entered into with large financial institutions, which we periodically evaluate for credit risks. We hedge our balance sheet exposure by hedging EUR, GBP, and AUD denominated cash, receivablesaccounts receivable, and payablesaccounts payable balances, and our economic exposure by hedging a portion of anticipated EUR and GBP denominated sales and our MX$ denominated expenditures. We can provide no assurance that our strategy will be successful in the future and that exchange rate fluctuations will not materially adversely affect our business. We do not hold or issues derivative financial instruments for speculative trading purposes.

We experienced immaterial net foreign currency losses in the year ended March 31, 20122013. Although we hedge a portion of our foreign currency exchange exposure, the weakening of certain foreign currencies, particularly the EuroEUR and the Great Britain PoundGBP in comparison to the U.S. Dollar ("USD"), could result in material foreign exchange losses in future periods.


45


Non-designated Hedges

We hedge our EUR, GBP, and AUD denominated cash, receivablesaccounts receivable, and payablesaccounts payable balances by entering into foreign exchange forward contracts.

The table below presents the impact on the foreign exchange gain (loss) of a hypothetical 10% appreciation and a 10% depreciation of the USD against the forward currency contracts as of March 31, 20122013 (in millions):

Currency - forward contracts Position USD Value of Net Foreign Exchange Contracts Foreign Exchange Gain From 10% Appreciation of USD Foreign Exchange (Loss) From 10% Depreciation of USD Position USD Value of Net Foreign Exchange Contracts Foreign Exchange Gain From 10% Appreciation of USD Foreign Exchange (Loss) From 10% Depreciation of USD
EUR Sell Euro $25.3
 $2.5
 $(2.5) Sell EUR $24.4
 $2.4
 $(2.4)
GBP Sell GBP $5.8
 $0.6
 $(0.6) Sell GBP $7.3
 $0.7
 $(0.7)
AUD Sell AUD $2.7
 $0.3
 $(0.3) Sell AUD $2.6
 $0.3
 $(0.3)
 
Cash Flow Hedges
 
Approximately 43%, 41%43%, and 38%41% of net revenues in fiscal years 20122013, 20112012, and 20102011, respectively, were derived from sales outside of the U.S., which were denominated predominantlyprimarily in EUR and GBP in each of the fiscal years.

As of March 31, 2013, we had foreign currency put and call option contracts with notional amounts of approximately €50.2 million and £19.9 million, denominated in EUR and GBP, respectively. As of March 31, 2012, we also had foreign currency put and call option contracts with notional amounts of approximately €63.7 million and £20.0 million denominated in EUR and GBP, respectively. As of March 31, 2011, we also had foreign currency put and call option contracts with notional amounts of approximately €52.7 million and £14.5 million denominated in EUR and GBP, respectively. Collectively, our option contracts hedge against a portion of our forecasted foreign currency denominated sales. If the USD is subjected to either a 10% appreciation or 10% depreciation versus these net exposed currency positions, we could realize a gain of $9.4 million or incur a loss of $8.1 million, respectively.


44


The table below presents the impact on the Black-Scholes valuation of our currency option contracts of a hypothetical 10% appreciation and a 10% depreciation of the USD against the indicated option contract type for cash flow hedges as of March 31, 20122013 (in millions):

Currency - option contracts USD Value of Net Foreign Exchange Contracts Foreign Exchange Gain From 10% Appreciation of USD Foreign Exchange (Loss) From 10% Depreciation of USD USD Value of Net Foreign Exchange Contracts Foreign Exchange Gain From 10% Appreciation of USD Foreign Exchange (Loss) From 10% Depreciation of USD
Call options $123.9
 $1.6
 $(5.3) $99.3
 $0.9
 $(4.8)
Put options $115.1
 $7.8
 $(2.8) $92.0
 $5.8
 $(1.5)

Collectively, our swap contracts hedge against a portion of our forecasted MX$ denominated expenditures. As of March 31, 2012,2013, we had cross currency swap contracts with notional amounts of approximately MX$317.5325.4 million.

The table below presents the impact on the valuation of our cross-currency swap contracts of a hypothetical 10% appreciation and a 10% depreciation of the USD as of March 31, 20122013 (in millions):

Currency - cross-currency swap contracts USD Value of Cross-Currency Swap Contracts Foreign Exchange (Loss) From 10% Appreciation of USD Foreign Exchange Gain From 10% Depreciation of USD USD Value of Cross-Currency Swap Contracts Foreign Exchange (Loss) From 10% Appreciation of USD Foreign Exchange Gain From 10% Depreciation of USD
Position: Buy MX$ $23.5
 $(2.2) $2.7
 $25.2
 $(2.3) $2.9


4645


ITEM 8.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Plantronics, Inc.:

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(1) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Plantronics, Inc. and its subsidiaries at March 31, 201230, 2013 and April 2, 2011March 31, 2012, and the results of their operations, their comprehensive income, and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 201230, 2013 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedules listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) presentpresents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements.  Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 201230, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).  The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule,schedules, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.  Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements, on the financial statement schedule,schedules, and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits.  We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.  Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk.  Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California
May 25, 201224, 2013

4746


PLANTRONICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except per share data)
 
March 31,March 31,
2012 20112013 2012
ASSETS 
   
  
Current assets: 
   
  
Cash and cash equivalents$209,335
 $277,373
$228,776
 $209,335
Short-term investments125,177
 152,583
116,581
 125,177
Accounts receivable, net111,771
 103,289
128,209
 111,771
Inventory, net53,713
 56,473
67,435
 53,713
Deferred tax assets11,090
 11,349
10,120
 11,090
Other current assets13,088
 16,653
15,369
 13,088
Total current assets524,174
 617,720
566,490
 524,174
Long-term investments55,347
 39,332
80,261
 55,347
Property, plant and equipment, net76,159
 70,622
99,111
 76,159
Goodwill and purchased intangibles, net14,388
 14,861
16,440
 14,388
Other assets2,402
 2,112
2,303
 2,402
Total assets$672,470
 $744,647
$764,605
 $672,470
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 
  
 
  
Current liabilities: 
  
 
  
Accounts payable$34,126
 $33,995
$37,067
 $34,126
Accrued liabilities52,067
 59,607
66,419
 52,067
Total current liabilities86,193
 93,602
103,486
 86,193
Deferred tax liabilities8,673
 3,526
1,742
 8,673
Long-term income taxes payable12,150
 11,524
12,005
 12,150
Revolving line of credit37,000
 

 37,000
Other long-term liabilities1,210
 1,143
925
 1,210
Total liabilities145,226
 109,795
118,158
 145,226
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)

 

Stockholders' equity: 
  
 
  
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share; 1,000 shares authorized, no shares outstanding
 

 
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share; 100,000 shares authorized, 47,160 shares and 50,043 shares issued at 2012 and 2011, respectively741
 720
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share; 100,000 shares authorized, 43,296 shares and 47,160 shares issued at 2013 and 2012, respectively757
 741
Additional paid-in capital557,218
 499,027
612,283
 557,218
Accumulated other comprehensive income6,357
 1,473
5,567
 6,357
Retained earnings115,358
 192,468
28,344
 115,358
Total stockholders' equity before treasury stock679,674
 693,688
646,951
 679,674
Less: Treasury stock (common: 4,648 and 1,728 shares at 2012 and 2011, respectively) at cost(152,430) (58,836)
Less: Treasury stock (common: 13 shares and 4,648 shares at 2013 and 2012, respectively) at cost(504) (152,430)
Total stockholders' equity527,244
 634,852
646,447
 527,244
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$672,470
 $744,647
$764,605
 $672,470

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


4847


PLANTRONICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)
 
Fiscal Year Ended March 31,Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
2012 2011 20102013 2012 2011
Net revenues$713,368
 $683,602
 $613,837
$762,226
 $713,368
 $683,602
Cost of revenues329,017
 321,846
 312,767
359,045
 329,017
 321,846
Gross profit384,351
 361,756
 301,070
403,181
 384,351
 361,756
Operating expenses:   
  
     
Research, development and engineering69,664
 63,183
 57,784
80,373
 69,664
 63,183
Selling, general and administrative173,334
 163,389
 143,784
182,445
 173,334
 163,389
Gain from litigation settlement
 (5,100) 

 
 (5,100)
Restructuring and other related charges
 (428) 1,867
2,266
 
 (428)
Total operating expenses242,998
 221,044
 203,435
265,084
 242,998
 221,044
Operating income141,353
 140,712
 97,635
138,097
 141,353
 140,712
Interest and other income (expense), net1,249
 (56) 3,105
328
 1,249
 (56)
Income from continuing operations before income taxes142,602
 140,656
 100,740
Income tax expense from continuing operations33,566
 31,413
 24,287
Income from continuing operations, net of tax109,036
 109,243
 76,453
Discontinued operations:   
  
Loss from operations of discontinued AEG segment (including loss on sale)
 
 (30,468)
Income tax benefit on discontinued operations
 
 (11,393)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
 
 (19,075)
Income before income taxes138,425
 142,602
 140,656
Income tax expense32,023
 33,566
 31,413
Net income$109,036
 $109,243
 $57,378
$106,402
 $109,036
 $109,243
          
Earnings (loss) per common share:   
  
Earnings per common share:   
  
Basic   
  
$2.55
 $2.48
 $2.29
Continuing operations$2.48
 $2.29
 $1.58
Discontinued operations$
 $
 $(0.39)
Net income$2.48
 $2.29
 $1.18
Diluted   
  
$2.49
 $2.41
 $2.21
Continuing operations$2.41
 $2.21
 $1.55
Discontinued operations$
 $
 $(0.39)
Net income$2.41
 $2.21
 $1.16
          
Shares used in basic per share calculations44,023
 47,713
 48,504
Shares used in diluted per share calculations45,265
 49,344
 49,331
Shares used in computing earnings per common share:     
Basic41,748
 44,023
 47,713
Diluted42,738
 45,265
 49,344
          
Cash dividends declared per common share$0.20
 $0.20
 $0.20
0.40
 0.20
 0.20

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

48


PLANTRONICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands)

  Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
  2013 2012 2011
Net income

 $106,402
 $109,036
 $109,243
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:

      
Foreign currency translation adjustments

 (261) (788) 1,613
Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges:

      
Unrealized cash flow hedge gains (losses) arising during the year 3,379
 2,888
 (3,573)
Net (gains) losses reclassified into income for revenue hedges (3,306) 2,353
 (2,423)
Net (gains) losses reclassified into income for cost of revenues hedges (628) 377
 (423)
Net unrealized (losses) gains on cash flow hedges $(555) $5,618
 $(6,419)
Unrealized gains (losses) on investments:

      
Unrealized holding gains during the year 26
 64
 29
Net losses reclassified into income 
 (10) (22)
Net unrealized gains on investments $26
 $54
 $7
Other comprehensive income (loss)

 (790) 4,884
 (4,799)
Comprehensive income

 $105,612
 $113,920
 $104,444




The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


49

PLANTRONICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)



Fiscal Year Ended March 31,Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
2012 2011 20102013 2012 2011
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES 
  
  
 
  
  
Net income$109,036
 $109,243
 $57,378
$106,402
 $109,036
 $109,243
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

  
  
     
Depreciation and amortization13,760
 16,275
 18,144
16,219
 13,760
 16,275
Stock-based compensation17,481
 15,873
 14,577
18,350
 17,481
 15,873
Provision for (benefit from) doubtful accounts and sales allowances758
 (8) (243)430
 758
 (8)
Provision for excess and obsolete inventories2,222
 1,099
 418
1,576
 2,222
 1,099
Benefit from deferred income taxes(9,134) (5,165) (12,449)
Income tax benefit associated with stock option exercises5,637
 6,195
 3,669
Deferred income taxes984
 (3,497) 1,030
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation(7,043) (5,747) (2,247)(2,722) (7,043) (5,747)
Amortization of premium on investments, net1,554
 578
 
1,126
 1,554
 578
Impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets
 
 25,194
Non-cash restructuring charges
 
 6,261
Loss on sale of discontinued operations
 
 611
Other operating activities683
 (5) 384
693
 683
 (5)
Changes in assets and liabilities:   
  
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisition:     
Accounts receivable, net(9,402) (15,086) 388
(16,335) (9,402) (15,086)
Inventory, net606
 12,962
 27,620
(14,811) 606
 12,962
Current and other assets(67) (2,280) 2,868
(6,056) (67) (2,280)
Accounts payable131
 10,216
 (9,048)2,778
 131
 10,216
Accrued liabilities(4,303) 9,873
 (1,001)9,641
 (4,303) 9,873
Income taxes18,529
 4,209
 11,205
7,226
 18,529
 4,209
Cash provided by operating activities140,448
 158,232
 143,729
125,501
 140,448
 158,232
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES 
  
  
 
  
  
Proceeds from sales of short-term investments78,554
 28,034
 4,000
39,423
 78,554
 28,034
Proceeds from maturities of short-term investments189,131
 114,495
 145,000
184,115
 189,131
 114,495
Purchase of short-term investments(176,941) (263,260) (84,990)(145,103) (176,941) (263,260)
Proceeds from sales of long-term investments9,935
 664
 750
17,048
 9,935
 664
Purchase of long-term investments(90,954) (48,870) 
(113,175) (90,954) (48,870)
Capital expenditures and other assets(19,140) (18,667) (6,262)(39,310) (19,140) (18,667)
Acquisition, net of cash acquired(1,926) 
 
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment and assets held for sale
 9,066
 277

 
 9,066
Proceeds received from sale of AEG segment
 1,625
 9,121

 
 1,625
Cash (used for) provided by investing activities(9,415) (176,913) 67,896
Cash used for investing activities(58,928) (9,415) (176,913)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES 
  
  
 
  
  
Repurchase of common stock(273,791) (105,522) (49,652)(23,931) (273,791) (105,522)
Proceeds from sale of treasury stock4,901
 4,192
 3,623
Proceeds from issuance of common stock38,222
 50,109
 32,581
Proceeds from issuances under stock-based compensation plans

31,865
 43,123
 54,301
Employees' tax withheld and paid for restricted stock and restricted stock units(3,047) (2,596) (194)
Proceeds from revolving line of credit68,500
 
 
18,000
 68,500
 
Repayments of revolving line of credit(31,500) 
 
(55,000) (31,500) 
Payment of cash dividends(9,040) (9,703) (9,781)(17,072) (9,040) (9,703)
Employees' tax withheld and paid for restricted stock and restricted stock units(2,596) (194) 
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation7,043
 5,747
 2,247
2,722
 7,043
 5,747
Cash used for financing activities(198,261) (55,371) (20,982)(46,463) (198,261) (55,371)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents(810) 1,464
 1,125
(669) (810) 1,464
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents(68,038) (72,588) 191,768
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents19,441
 (68,038) (72,588)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year277,373
 349,961
 158,193
209,335
 277,373
 349,961
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$209,335
 $277,373
 $349,961
$228,776
 $209,335
 $277,373
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES   
  
   
  
Cash paid for income taxes$20,752
 $29,180
 $11,663
$29,953
 $20,752
 $29,180
Transfers from long-term investments to short-term investments$71,235
 $64,853
 $

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

50

PLANTRONICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(in thousands)



Common Stock Additional Paid-In Accumulated Other Comprehensive Retained Treasury Total Stockholders'Common Stock Additional Paid-In Accumulated Other Comprehensive Retained Treasury Total Stockholders'
Shares Amount Capital Income Earnings Stock EquityShares Amount Capital Income Earnings Stock Equity
Balances at March 31, 200948,892
 $678
 $386,224
 $8,855
 $203,936
 $(74,326) $525,367
Balances at March 31, 201048,870
 $695
 $428,407
 $6,272
 $195,293
 $(59,333) $571,334
Net income
 
 
 
 57,378
 
 57,378

 
 
 
 109,243
 
 109,243
Foreign currency translation adjustments
 
 
 1,047
 
 
 1,047

 
 
 1,613
 
 
 1,613
Unrealized loss on hedges, net of tax
 
 
 (3,630) 
 
 (3,630)
Comprehensive income 
  
  
 

  
  
 54,795
Exercise of stock options1,493
 15
 32,564
 
 
 
 32,579
Issuance of restricted common stock154
 2
 
 
 
 
 2
Net unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax
 
 
 (6,419) 
 
 (6,419)
Net unrealized gains on investments, net of tax
 
 
 7
 
 
 7
Proceeds from issuances under stock-based compensation plans2,792
 25
 50,428
 
 
 3,848
 54,301
Repurchase of restricted common stock(18) 
 
 
 
 
 
(26) 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash dividends
 
 
 
 (9,781) 
 (9,781)
 
 
 
 (9,703) 
 (9,703)
Stock-based compensation
 
 14,877
 
 
 
 14,877

 
 15,873
 
 
 
 15,873
Income tax benefit associated with stock options
 
 (476) 
 
 
 (476)
Repurchase of common stock(1,935) 
 
 
 
 (49,652) (49,652)
Sale of treasury stock284
 
 (4,782) 
 
 8,405
 3,623
Retirement of treasury stock
 
 
 
 (56,240) 56,240
 
Balances at March 31, 201048,870
 695
 428,407
 6,272
 195,293
 (59,333) 571,334
Net income
 
 
 
 109,243
 
 109,243
Foreign currency translation adjustments
 
 
 1,613
 
 
 1,613
Unrealized loss on hedges, net of tax
 
 
 (6,419) 
 
 (6,419)
Unrealized gain on investments, net of tax
 
 
 7
 
 
 7
Comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 104,444
Exercise of stock options2,196
 22
 50,084
 
 
 
 50,106
Issuance of restricted common stock424
 3
 
 
 
 
 3
Repurchase of restricted common stock(26) 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash dividends
 
 
 
 (9,703) 
 (9,703)
Stock-based compensation
 
 15,873
 
 
 
 15,873
Income tax benefit associated with stock options
 
 4,319
 
 
 
 4,319
Tax benefit from stock-based awards
 
 4,319
 
 
 
 4,319
Repurchase of common stock(3,315) 
 
 
 
 (105,522) (105,522)(3,315) 
 
 
 
 (105,522) (105,522)
Employees' tax withheld and paid for restricted stock and restricted stock units(6) 
 
 
 
 (194) (194)(6) 
 
 
 
 (194) (194)
Sale of treasury stock172
 
 344
 
 
 3,848
 4,192
Retirement of treasury stock
 
 
 
 (102,365) 102,365
 

 
 
 
 (102,365) 102,365
 
Balances at March 31, 201148,315
 720
 499,027
 1,473
 192,468
 (58,836) 634,852
48,315
 720
 499,027
 1,473
 192,468
 (58,836) 634,852
Net income
 
 
 
 109,036
 
 109,036

 
 
 
 109,036
 
 109,036
Foreign currency translation adjustments
 
 
 (788) 
 
 (788)
 
 
 (788) 
 
 (788)
Unrealized gain on hedges, net of tax
 
 
 5,618
 
 
 5,618
Unrealized gain on investments, net of tax
 
 
 54
 
 
 54
Comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 113,920
Exercise of stock options1,831
 18
 38,201
 
 
 
 38,219
Issuance of restricted common stock346
 3
 
 
 
 
 3
Net unrealized gains on cash flow hedges, net of tax
 
 
 5,618
 
 
 5,618
Net unrealized gains on investments, net of tax
 
 
 54
 
 
 54
Proceeds from issuances under stock-based compensation plans2,359
 21
 37,415
 
 
 5,687
 43,123
Repurchase of restricted common stock(60) 
 
 
 
 
 
(60) 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash dividends
 
 
 
 (9,040) 
 (9,040)
 
 
 
 (9,040) 
 (9,040)
Stock-based compensation
 
 17,481
 
 
 
 17,481

 
 17,481
 
 
 
 17,481
Income tax benefit associated with stock options
 
 3,295
 
 
 
 3,295
Tax benefit from stock-based awards
 
 3,295
 
 
 
 3,295
Repurchase of common stock(8,027) 
 
 
 
 (273,791) (273,791)(8,027) 
 
 
 
 (273,791) (273,791)
Employees' tax withheld and paid for restricted stock and restricted stock units(75) 
 
 
 
 (2,596) (2,596)(75) 
 
 
 
 (2,596) (2,596)
Sale of treasury stock182
 
 (786) 
 
 5,687
 4,901
Retirement of treasury stock
 
 
 
 (177,106) 177,106
 

 
 
 
 (177,106) 177,106
 
Balances at March 31, 201242,512
 $741
 $557,218
 $6,357
 $115,358
 $(152,430) $527,244
42,512
 741
 557,218
 6,357
 115,358
 (152,430) 527,244
Net income
 
 
 
 106,402
 
 106,402
Foreign currency translation adjustments
 
 
 (261) 
 
 (261)
Net unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax
 
 
 (555) 
 
 (555)
Net unrealized gains on investments, net of tax
 
 
 26
 
 
 26
Proceeds from issuances under stock-based compensation plans1,730
 16
 29,289
 
 
 2,560
 31,865
Repurchase of restricted common stock(114) 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash dividends
 
 
 
 (17,072) 
 (17,072)
Stock-based compensation
 
 18,350
 
 
 
 18,350
Tax benefit from stock-based awards
 
 1,260
 
 
 
 1,260
Repurchase of common stock(752) 
 
 
 
 (23,931) (23,931)
Employees' tax withheld and paid for restricted stock and restricted stock units(93) 
 
 
 
 (3,047) (3,047)
Adjustment related to expired stock options
 
 6,166
 
 
 
 6,166
Retirement of treasury stock
 
 
 
 (176,344) 176,344
 
Balances at March 31, 201343,283
 $757
 $612,283
 $5,567
 $28,344
 $(504) $646,447


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

51


PLANTRONICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.THE COMPANY
 
Plantronics, Inc. (“Plantronics” or the “Company”“the Company”) is a leading worldwide designer, manufacturer, and marketer of lightweight communications headsets, telephone headset systems, and accessories for the business and consumer markets under the Plantronics brand. In addition, the Company manufactures and markets specialty products under theits Clarity brand, specialty products, such as telephones for the hearing impaired, and other related products for people with special communication needs. The Company operates its business as one segment.
 
Founded in 1961, Plantronics is incorporated in the state of Delaware and trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “PLT”.

2.SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Management's Use of Estimates and Assumptions
 
The preparation ofCompany's consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP") requires management. In connection with the preparation of our financial statements, the Company is required to make assumptions and estimates about future events, and assumptionsapply judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, net revenues, expenses, and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assetsrelated disclosures. The Company bases its assumptions, estimates, and liabilitiesjudgments on historical experience, current trends, future expectations, and other factors that management believes to be relevant at the date oftime the consolidated financial statements are prepared. On an ongoing basis, the Company reviews its accounting policies, assumptions, estimates, and judgments, including those related to revenue and related reserves and allowances, inventory valuation, product warranty obligations, the reported amountsuseful lives of revenueslong-lived assets including property, plant and expenses duringequipment and intangible assets, investment fair values, stock-based compensation, goodwill, income taxes, contingencies, and restructuring charges, to ensure that the reporting period.  These estimatesconsolidated financial statements are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements.  Actualpresented fairly and in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Because future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, actual results could differ materially from thosethe Company's assumptions and estimates.

Principles of Consolidation
 
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Plantronics and its wholly owned subsidiaries.  The Company has included the results of operations of acquired companies from the date of acquisition. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Reclassifications
Certain financial statement reclassifications have been made to previously reported amounts to conform to the current year's presentation.

Segment Information
Prior to December 1, 2009, the Company operated under two reportable segments, the Audio Communications Group (“ACG”) and the Audio Entertainment Group (“AEG”).  As set forth in Note 4, Discontinued Operations, the Company completed the sale of Altec Lansing, its AEG segment, effective December 1, 2009, and, therefore, it is no longer included in continuing operations and the Company operates as one segment.  Accordingly, the Company has classified the AEG operating results, including the loss on sale of AEG, as discontinued operations in the Consolidated statement of operations for all periods presented.

Fiscal Year
 
The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to the last day of March.  Fiscal yearyears 2013, 2012 ended on March 31, 2012, and consists of 52 weeks, fiscal year 2011 ended on April 2, 2011 and consistseach consisted of 52 weeks and fiscal year 2010ended on March 30, 2013, March 31, 2012, and April 3, 20102, 2011 and consists of 53 weeks., respectively.  For purposes of presentation, the Company has indicated its accounting fiscal year as ending on March 31.


52


Financial Instruments
 
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments
The Company's investment policy and strategy are focused on preservation of capital and supporting liquidity requirements. A portion of the Company's cash is managed by external managers within the guidelines of the Company's investment policy. The Company's exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to its investment portfolio. The Company's policy limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer and requires investments to be rated A or A2 and above, with the objective of minimizing the potential risk of principal loss. All highly liquid investments with initial stated maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase are classified as cash equivalents. The Company classifies its investments as either short-term or long-term based on each instrument's underlying effective maturity date and reasonable expectations with regard to sales and redemptions of the instruments. All short-term investments have effective maturities less than 12 months, while all long-term investments have effective maturities greater than 12 months or the Company does not currently have the ability to liquidate the investments. The Company may sell its investments prior to their stated maturities for strategic purposes, in anticipation of credit deterioration, or for duration management.   

As of March 31, 20122013, all investments were classified as available-for-sale, with unrealized gains and losses recorded as a separate component of Accumulatedaccumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI") in Stockholders’stockholders’ equity.  The specific identification method is used to determine the cost of securities disposed of,securities, with realized gains and losses reflected in Interestinterest and other income (expense), net.


52


For investments with an unrealized loss, the factors considered in the review include the credit quality of the issuer, the duration that the fair value has been less than the adjusted cost basis, severity of impairment, reason for the decline in value and potential recovery period, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the investees, and whether the Company would be required to sell an investment due to liquidity or contractual reasons before its anticipated recovery. (See Note 5)

Foreign Currency Derivatives
The Company accounts for its derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities and carries them at fair value.  Derivative foreign currency call and put option contracts are valued using pricing models that use observable inputs. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative depends on the intended use of the derivative and the resulting designation.  For derivative instruments designated as a

The Company enters into foreign exchange forward contracts to reduce the impact of foreign currency fluctuations on assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the reporting entity.  These foreign exchange forward contracts are not subject to the hedge accounting provisions of the Derivatives and Hedging Topic of the FASB ASC, but are carried at fair value hedge, the gain or loss is recognized in earningswith changes in the periodfair value recorded within interest and other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of change togetheroperations in accordance with the offsetting loss or gainForeign Currency Matters Topic of the FASB ASC.  Gains and losses on these contracts are intended to offset the impact of foreign exchange rate changes on the hedged item attributedunderlying foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities, and therefore, do not subject the Company to the risk being hedged.  For a derivative instrument designatedmaterial balance sheet risk. 

The Company has significant international revenues and costs denominated in foreign currencies, subjecting it to foreign currency risk. The Company purchases foreign currency exchange contracts that qualify as a cash flow hedge,hedges, with maturities of 12 months or less, to reduce the volatility of cash flows related primarily to forecasted revenue and intercompany transactions denominated in certain foreign currencies. All outstanding derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value. The effective portion of the derivative’sdesignated derivative's gain or loss is initially reported as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive income in Stockholders’ equityAOCI and is subsequently reclassified into earnings whenthe financial statement line item in which the hedged exposureitem is recorded in the same period the forecasted transaction affects earnings.  The ineffective portion of the gain or loss is reported in earnings immediately.  For derivative instruments that are not designated as accounting hedges, changes in fair value are recognized in earnings in the period of change.  
The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for speculative trading purposes.  Plantronics enters into derivatives only with counterparties that are among the largest United States ("U.S.") banks, ranked by assets, in order to minimize its credit risk and to date, no such counterparty has failed to meet its financial obligations under such contracts. (See Note 16)

Provision for Doubtful Accounts
 
The Company maintains a provision for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments.  Plantronics regularly performs credit evaluations of its customers’ financial conditions and considers factors such as historical experience, credit quality, age of the accounts receivable balances, geographic or country-specific risks, and economic conditions that may affect a customer’s ability to pay.  

Inventory and Related Reserves
 
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market.  The Company writes down inventories that have become obsolete or are in excess of anticipated demand or net realizable value. Our estimate of write downs for excess and obsolete inventory is based on a detailed analysis of on-hand inventory and purchase commitments in excess of forecasted demand. Cost is computed using standard cost, which approximates actual cost on a first-in, first-out basis.  Shipping and handling costs incurred in connection with the sale of products are included in Costcost of revenues.

Management writes downA substantial portion of the raw materials, components and subassemblies used in the Company's products are provided by its suppliers on a consignment basis. These consigned inventories that have become obsolete or are in excessnot recorded on the Company's consolidated balance sheet until it takes possession of anticipated demand or net realizable valueand title to the lowerraw materials, components, and subassemblies, which occurs when they are consumed in the production process. Prior to consumption in the production process, the Company's suppliers bear the risk of cost or market value. Once inventory is written down, subsequent changes in factsloss and circumstances do not result in restorationretain title to the original cost basis or an increaseconsigned inventory. Consigned inventory not consumed in the new, lower-cost basis.production process is returnable to the Company's suppliers in accordance with the terms of the Company's agreements with them. If the Company were to purchase all or a material portion of the materials and components consigned by its suppliers, the Company could incur unanticipated expenses, including write-downs for excess and obsolete inventory. As of March 31, 2013 and 2012, the off-balance sheet consigned inventory balances were $31.3 million and $24.7 million, respectively.

Product Warranty Obligations
 
The Company records a liability for the estimated costs of warranties at the time the related revenue is recognized. The specific warranty terms and conditions range from one to two years starting from the delivery date to the end user and vary depending upon the product sold and the country in which the Company does business. Factors that affect the warranty obligations include product failure rates, estimated return rates, the amount of time lapsed from the date of sale to the date of return, material usage, and service delivery costs incurred in correcting product failures.

53



Goodwill and Purchased Intangibles
 
Goodwill has been measured as the excess of the cost of acquisition over the amount assigned to tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired less liabilities assumed.  At least annually, in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist, management performs a review to determine if the carrying value of goodwill is impaired. The identification and measurement of goodwill impairment involves the estimation of fair value at the Company’s reporting unit level.  The Company determines its reporting units by assessing whether discrete financial information is available and if segment management regularly reviews the results of that component. The Company has determined it has one reporting unit.

The Company performs an initial assessment of qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events and circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If, after assessing the totality of relevant events and circumstances, the Company determines that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value and there is no indication of impairment, no further testing is performed; however, if the Company concludes otherwise, the first step of the two-step impairment test must be performed by estimating the fair value of the reporting unit and comparing it with its carrying value, including goodwill. (See Note 8)

Intangible assets other than goodwill are carried at cost and amortized over their estimated useful lives. The Company reviews identifiable finite-lived intangible assets to be held and used for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. Determination of recoverability is based on the lowest level of identifiable estimated undiscounted cash flows resulting from use of the asset and its ultimate disposition. Measurement of any impairment loss is based on the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair market value.

Property, Plant and Equipment
 
Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets, which range from two to thirty years.  Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the remaining lease term. Costs associated with internal-use software are recorded in accordance with the Intangibles - Goodwill and Other Topic of the Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC").  Capitalized software costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life.life of the assets.
 
Long-lived assets, including property,Property, plant and equipment areis reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. The Company recognizes an impairment charge in the event the net book value of such assets exceeds the future undiscounted cash flows attributable to the assets.asset group. No material impairment losses were incurred in the periods presented.

Fair Value Measurements

The Company applies fair value accounting for allAll financial assets and liabilities and non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements. Fair value is estimated by applying the following hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three levels and bases the categorization within the hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement:

Level 1
The Company's Level 1 financial assets consist of cash, money market funds and U.S. Treasury Bills, and derivative foreign currency forward contracts that are traded in an active market with sufficient volume and frequency of transactions.Bills. Level 1 financial liabilities consist of derivative contracts that have closed but have not settled.

The fair value of Level 1 financial instruments is measured based on the quoted market price of identical securities.

Level 2
The Company's Level 2 financial assets and liabilities consist of Government Agency Securities, Commercial Paper, U.S. Corporate Bonds, Certificates of Deposit ("CDs"), and derivative foreign currency call and put option contracts.

The fair value of Level 2 investment securities is determined based on other observable inputs, including multiple non-binding quotes from independent pricing services. Non-binding quotes are based on proprietary valuation models that are prepared by the independent pricing services and use algorithms based on inputs such as observable market data, quoted market prices for similar securities, issuer spreads, and internal assumptions of the broker. The Company corroborates the reasonableness of non-binding quotes received from the independent pricing services using a variety of techniques depending on the underlying instrument, including: (i) comparing them to actual experience gained from the purchases and maturities of investment securities, (ii) comparing them to internally developed cash flow models based on observable inputs, and (iii) monitoring changes in ratings of similar securities and the related impact on fair value.

54



The fair value of Level 2 derivative foreign currency call and put option contracts is determined using pricing models that use observable market inputs.


54


Level 3
The fair value of Level 3 financial instruments is determined using inputs that are unobservable and reflect the Company's estimate of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The Company had no Level 3 assets or liabilities as of March 31, 20122013 or 2011.

In accordance with the fair value accounting requirements, companies may choose to measure eligible financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The Company has not elected the fair value option for any eligible financial instruments.2012.

Revenue Recognition
 
The Company sells substantially all of its products directly to customers andend users through other distribution channels, including distributors, retailers, carriers, and original equipment manufacturers ("OEMs"). The Company's revenue is derived primarily from the sale of headsets, telephone headset systems, and accessories for the business and consumer markets and is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured. These criteria are usually met at the time of product shipment; however, the Company defers revenue when any significant obligations remain and to date this has accounted for less than 1% of the Company's Netnet revenues. Customer purchase orders and/or contracts are used to determine the existence of an arrangement. Product is considered delivered once it has been shipped and title and risk of loss have been transferred to the customer. The Company assesses whether a price is fixed or determinable based upon the selling terms associated with the transaction and whether the sales price is subject to refund or adjustment. The Company assesses collectibility based on a customer's credit quality, historical experience, and geographic or country-specific risks and economic conditions that may affect a customer's ability to pay.

Sales through retail and distribution channels are made primarily under agreements or commitments allowing for rights of return and include various sales incentive programs, such as rebates, advertising, price protection, and other sales incentives. The Company has an established sales history for these arrangements and records the estimated reserves and allowances at the time the related revenue is recognized. Sales return reserves are estimated based on historical data, relevant current data, and the monitoring of inventory build-up in the distribution channel. The allowance for sales incentive programs is based on historical experience and contractual terms or commitments in the form of lump sum payments or sell-through credits.
Research, Development and Engineering

Research, developmentWhen a sales arrangement contains multiple elements, such as hardware and engineering costssoftware products and/or services, the Company allocates revenue to each element based on relative selling prices. The selling price for a deliverable is based on its vendor specific objective evidence ("VSOE"), if available, third party evidence ("TPE") if VSOE is not available, or estimated selling price ("ESP") if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. In multiple element arrangements where more-than-incidental software deliverables are expensedincluded, the Company allocates revenue to each separate unit of accounting for each of the non-software deliverables and to the software deliverables as incurred and consist primarilya group using the relative selling prices of compensation costs, outside services, including legal fees associated with protectingeach of the Company's intellectual property, expensed materials, depreciation, and an allocation of overhead expenses, including facilities, IT and human resources costs.deliverables in the arrangement based on the aforementioned selling price hierarchy.

Advertising Costs
 
The Company expenses all advertising costs as incurred.  Advertising expense for the years ended March 31, 20122013, 20112012 and 20102011 was$3.6 million, $2.6 million, $2.4 millionand $4.62.4 million, respectively.

Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes are determined based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the currently enacted tax rates and laws. The Company records a valuation allowance against particular deferred income tax assets if it is more likely than not that those assets will not be realized. The provision for income taxes comprises the Company's current tax liability and changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities.

Significant judgment is required in evaluating the Company's uncertain tax positions and determining its provision for income taxes. The Company establishes reserves for tax-related uncertainties based on estimates of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. These reserves are established when the Company believes that certain positions might be challenged despite its belief that its tax return positions are in accordance with applicable tax laws. The Company adjusts these reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the closing of a tax audit, new tax legislation, or the change of an estimate. To the extent that the final tax outcome of these matters is different than the amounts recorded, such differences will affect the provision for income taxes in the period in which such determination is made. The provision for income taxes includes the effect of reserve provisions and changes to reserves that are considered appropriate, as well as the related net interest and penalties. The Company follows the tax law ordering to determine when excess tax benefits have been realized.


55


The Company is subject to income taxes in the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions. At any one time, multiple tax years are subject to audit by the various tax authorities.

The Company recognizes the impact of an uncertain income tax position on income tax expense at the largest amount that is more-likely-than-not to be sustained.  An unrecognized tax benefit will not be recognized unless it has a greater than 50% likelihood of being sustained.  The Company adjusts its tax liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the period in which an uncertain tax position is effectively settled, the statute of limitations expires for the relevant taxing authority to examine the tax position, or when more information becomes available. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to income tax matters as a part of its provision for income taxes. (See Note 17)


55


Earnings Per Share
 
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing the net income for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, less common stock subject to repurchase.  Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing the net income for the period by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially dilutive common stock outstanding during the period.  Potentially dilutive common shares include shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options, the vesting of awards of restricted stock, and the estimated shares to be purchased under the Company’s employee stock purchase plan ("ESPP"), which are reflected in diluted earnings per share by application of the treasury stock method.  Under the treasury stock method, the amount that the employee must pay for exercising stock options, the amount of stock-based compensation cost for future services that the Company has not yet recognized, and the amount of tax benefit that would be recorded in additional paid-in capital upon exercise are assumed to be used to repurchase shares.  (See Note 18)
 
Comprehensive Income
 
Comprehensive income consists of two components, net income and other comprehensive income.  Other comprehensive income refers to income, expenses, gains, and losses that under U.S. GAAP are recorded as an element of stockholders’ equity but are excluded from net income.  Accumulated other comprehensive income, as presented in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, consists of foreign currency translation adjustments, unrealized gains and losses on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, net of tax, and unrealized gains and losses related to the Company’s investments,on marketable securities classified as available-for-sale, net of tax.
 
Foreign Operations and Currency Translation

The functional currency of the Company’s foreign sales and marketing offices, except as noted in the following paragraph, is the local currency of the respective operations.  For these foreign operations, the Company translates assets and liabilities into U.S. dollars using the period-end exchange rates in effect as of the balance sheet date and translates revenues and expenses using the average monthly exchange rates.  The resulting cumulative translation adjustments are included in Accumulatedaccumulated other comprehensive income, a separate component of Stockholders'stockholders' equity in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

The functional currency of the Company’s European finance, sales and logistics headquarters in the Netherlands, sales office and warehouse in Japan, manufacturing facilities in Tijuana, Mexico, and logistic and research and development facilities in China, is the U.S. Dollar.  For these foreign operations, assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are re-measured at the period-end or historical rates, as appropriate.  Revenues and expenses are re-measured at average monthly rates, which the Company believes to be a fair approximation of actual rates.  Currency transaction gains and losses are recognized in current operations.  (See Note 16)
 
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
 
The Company applies the provisions of the Compensation – Stock Compensation Topic of the FASB ASC, which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and non-employee directors based on estimated fair values. (See Note 12)The Company recognizes the grant-date fair value of stock-based compensation as compensation expense using the straight-line attribution approach over the service period for which the stock-based compensation is expected to vest.

The Company uses the “with and without” approach in determining the order in which tax attributes are utilized. As a result, the Company only recognizes a tax benefit from stock-based awards in additional paid-in capital if an incremental tax benefit is realized after all other tax attributes currently available to the Company have been utilized. When tax deductions from stock-based awards are less than the cumulative book compensation expense, the tax effect of the resulting difference (“shortfall”) is charged first to additional paid-in capital to the extent of the Company's pool of windfall tax benefits, with any remainder recognized in income tax expense. The Company has determined that it had a sufficient windfall pool available through the end of fiscal year 2013 to absorb any shortfalls. In addition, the Company accounts for the indirect effects of stock-based awards on other tax attributes, such as the research tax credit, through the consolidated statements of income.


56


Treasury Shares
 
From time to time, the Company repurchases shares of its common stock, depending on market conditions, in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions, in accordance with programs authorized by the Board of Directors.  Repurchased shares are held as treasury stock until such time as they are retired or re-issued. Retirements of treasury stock are non-cash equity transactions in which the reacquired shares are returned to the status of authorized but unissued shares and the cost is recorded as a reduction to both Retainedretained earnings and Treasurytreasury stock. (See Note 13)The stock repurchase programs are intended to offset the impact of dilution resulting from the Company's stock-based compensation programs.

Concentration of Risk
 
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents, short-term and long-term investments, and trade receivables.accounts receivable.  

Plantronics’ investment policies for cash limitpolicy limits investments to those that are low risk and also limithighly-rated securities. In addition, the Company limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer and restrictrestricts placement of these investments to issuers evaluated as creditworthy.  As of March 31, 20122013 and 20112012, the Company's investments were composed of U.S. Treasury Bills, Government Agency Securities, Commercial Paper, U.S. Corporate Bonds, and CDs.


56


Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited due to the large number of customers that comprise the Company’s customer base and their dispersion across different geographies and markets.  As of March 31, 2013 there was one customer whose outstanding accounts receivable balance was 10.3% of the Company's snet accounts receivable balance. No customer accounted for 10% or more of total net accounts receivable for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012. The Company does not believe other significant concentrations of credit risk exist. Plantronics performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers' financial condition and requires no collateral from its customers.  The Company maintains a provision for doubtful accounts based upon expected collectibility of all accounts receivable.

Certain inventory components required by the Company are only available from a limited number of suppliers.  The rapid rate of technological change and the necessity of developing and manufacturing products with short lifecycles may intensify these risks.  The inability to obtain components as required, or to develop alternative sources, as required in the future, could result in delays or reductions in product shipments, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. 

3.RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Recently Adopted Pronouncements

In September 2011,February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2011-08, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment. This ASU allows entities to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not (that is, a likelihood of more than 50 percent) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less thanFASB amended its carrying amount. If this is the case, the entity is required to perform a more detailed two-step goodwill impairment test that is used to identify potential goodwill impairment and to measure the amount of goodwill impairment losses, if any, to be recognized. The Company adopted ASU 2011-08 in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2012 and it did not have an impactguidance on the Company's financial statements. Refer to Note 8, Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets, for details of the goodwill impairment analysis.

Recently Issued Pronouncements

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. This ASU requires the Company to disclose both net and gross information about assets and liabilities that have been offset, if any, and the related arrangements. The disclosures under this new guidance are required to be provided retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. The Company is required to implement this guidance effective for the first quarter of fiscal 2014 and does not expect the adoption of ASU 2011-11 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), Presentation of Comprehensive Income, as amended, which requires the Company to present the totalpresentation of comprehensive income,income. Under the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. Certain of the provisions are effective for the Company in its first quarter of fiscal 2013 and will be applied retrospectively. The Company intends toamended guidance, an entity must present information regarding reclassification adjustments from accumulated other comprehensive income in two separatea single note or on the face of the financial statements. This is required for both annual and consecutive statements.

4.DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

interim reporting. The Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement on October 2, 2009has elected to sell Altec Lansing, its AEG segment ("AEG"), for whichadopt this guidance during the sale was completed effective December 1, 2009. AEG was engaged in the design, manufacture, sales and marketing of audio solutions and related technologies.  All of the revenues in the AEG segment were derived from the sale of Altec Lansing products. All operations of AEG have been classified as discontinued operations in the Consolidated statement of operations for all periods presented.

There was no income or loss from discontinued operations for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. The results from discontinued operations for the fiscal yearquarter ended March 31, 2010 were as follows (in thousands):2013.

Net revenues $64,916
Cost of revenues (53,127)
Operating expenses (16,433)
Impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets (25,194)
Restructuring and other related charges (19)
Loss on sale of AEG (611)
Loss from operations of discontinued AEG segment (including loss on sale of AEG) (30,468)
Tax benefit from discontinued operations (11,393)
Loss on discontinued operations, net of tax $(19,075)

57

Table of Contents


The Company recognized a pre-tax loss on the sale of Altec Lansing in fiscal year 2010, calculated as follows (in thousands):

Proceeds received upon close $11,075
Escrow payments received to date 2,065
Remaining escrow payments to be received (subsequently received in fiscal year 2011) 1,625
Payment to purchaser for adjustment for final value of net assets under APA (3,956)
Total estimated proceeds 10,809
Book value of net assets sold (11,057)
Costs incurred upon closing (363)
Loss on sale of AEG $(611)

5.4.CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND INVESTMENTS

The following table presents the Company's cash, cash equivalents and investments as of March 31, 20122013 and 20112012:

(in thousands) March 31, 2012 March 31, 2011 March 31, 2013 March 31, 2012
 Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value
Cash and cash equivalents:                                
Cash $147,338
 $
 $
 $147,338
 $136,804
 $
 $
 $136,804
 $118,881
 $
 $
 $118,881
 $147,338
 $
 $
 $147,338
Cash equivalents 61,996
 2
 (1) 61,997
 140,569
 1
 (1) 140,569
 109,895
 
 
 109,895
 61,996
 2
 (1) 61,997
Total Cash and cash equivalents $209,334
 $2
 $(1) $209,335
 $277,373
 $1
 $(1) $277,373
 $228,776
 $
 $
 $228,776
 $209,334
 $2
 $(1) $209,335
Short-term investments:                                
U.S. Treasury Bills and Government Agency Securities $61,898
 $22
 $(24) $61,896
 $105,849
 $17
 $(3) $105,863
 $66,092
 $18
 $(3) $66,107
 $61,898
 $22
 $(24) $61,896
Commercial Paper 20,041
 1
 (3) 20,039
 30,071
 5
 (1) 30,075
 15,670
 9
 
 15,679
 20,041
 1
 (3) 20,039
Corporate Bonds 38,300
 60
 (4) 38,356
 11,212
 4
 
 11,216
 34,766
 31
 (2) 34,795
 38,300
 60
 (4) 38,356
Certificates of Deposit ("CDs") 4,883
 3
 
 4,886
 5,420
 9
 
 5,429
 
 
 
 
 4,883
 3
 
 4,886
Total Short-term investments $125,122
 $86
 $(31) $125,177
 $152,552
 $35
 $(4) $152,583
 $116,528
 $58
 $(5) $116,581
 $125,122
 $86
 $(31) $125,177
                                
Long-term investments:                                
U.S. Treasury Bills and Government Agency Securities $29,814
 $24
 $(1) $29,837
 $17,387
 $4
 $
 $17,391
 $55,317
 $42
 $(1) $55,358
 $29,814
 $24
 $(1) $29,837
Corporate Bonds 25,507
 29
 (26) 25,510
 19,086
 8
 (35) 19,059
 23,878
 23
 (3) 23,898
 25,507
 29
 (26) 25,510
CDs 
 
 
 
 2,879
 3
 
 2,882
 1,002
 3
 
 1,005
 
 
 
 
Total Long-term investments $55,321
 $53
 $(27) $55,347
 $39,352
 $15
 $(35) $39,332
 $80,197
 $68
 $(4) $80,261
 $55,321
 $53
 $(27) $55,347
                                
Total cash, cash equivalents and investments $389,777
 $141
 $(59) $389,859
 $469,277
 $51
 $(40) $469,288
 $425,501
 $126
 $(9) $425,618
 $389,777
 $141
 $(59) $389,859

As of March 31, 20122013 and 20112012, all of the Company's investments are classified as available-for-sale securities. The carrying value of available-for-sale securities included in cash equivalents approximates fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments.


58

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the amortized cost and fair value of the Company's cash equivalents, short-term investments and long-term investments, classified by stated maturity as of March 31, 20122013 and 20112012:

(in thousands) March 31, 2012 March 31, 2011 March 31, 2013 March 31, 2012
 Amortized Cost Fair Value Amortized Cost Fair Value Amortized Cost Fair Value Amortized Cost Fair Value
Due in 1 year or less $187,118
 $187,174
 $293,121
 $293,152
 $226,423
 $226,476
 $187,118
 $187,174
Due in 1 to 3 years 55,321
 55,347
 39,352
 39,332
 80,197
 80,261
 55,321
 55,347
Total $242,439
 $242,521
 $332,473
 $332,484
 $306,620
 $306,737
 $242,439
 $242,521

The Company did not incur any material realized or unrealized net gains or losses for the fiscal years ended March 31, 20122013 and 20112012.


58

Table of Contents

6.5.FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The following table represents the Company's fair value hierarchy for its financial assets and liabilities:

Fair Values as of March 31, 2013:

(in thousands) Level 1 Level 2 Total
Cash and cash equivalents:      
Cash $118,881
 $
 $118,881
U.S. Treasury Bills 104,995
 
 104,995
Commercial Paper 
 4,900
 4,900
Short-term investments:      
   U.S. Treasury Bills and Government Agency Securities 7,243
 58,864
 66,107
Commercial Paper 
 15,679
 15,679
Corporate Bonds 
 34,795
 34,795
Long-term investments:      
U.S. Treasury Bills and Government Agency Securities 22,904
 32,454
 55,358
Corporate Bonds 
 23,898
 23,898
CDs 
 1,005
 1,005
Other current assets:      
   Derivative assets 
 1,665
 1,665
Total assets measured at fair value $254,023
 $173,260
 $427,283
       
Accrued liabilities:      
   Derivative liabilities $3
 $291
 $294

Fair Values as of March 31, 2012:

(in thousands) Level 1 Level 2 Total
Cash and cash equivalents:      
Cash $147,338
 $
 $147,338
U.S. Treasury Bills 50,000
 
 50,000
Commercial Paper 
 11,997
 11,997
Short-term investments:      
U.S. Treasury Bills and Government Agency Securities 12,898
 48,998
 61,896
Commercial Paper 
 20,039
 20,039
Corporate Bonds 
 38,356
 38,356
CDs 
 4,886
 4,886
Long-term investments:      
U.S. Treasury Bills and Government Agency Securities 6,647
 23,190
 29,837
Corporate Bonds 
 25,510
 25,510
Other current assets:      
Derivative assets 
 2,658
 2,658
Total assets measured at fair value $216,883
 $175,634
 $392,517
       
Accrued liabilities:      
Derivative liabilities $7
 $714
 $721

59


Fair Values as ofThere were no transfers between fair value measurement levels during the years ended March 31, 20112013: and

(in thousands) Level 1 Level 2 Total
Cash and cash equivalents:      
Cash $136,804
 $
 $136,804
U.S. Treasury Bills 74,991
 
 74,991
Commercial Paper 
 22,495
 22,495
Corporate Bonds 
 3,082
 3,082
CDs 
 2,001
 2,001
Money Market Accounts 38,000
 
 38,000
Short-term investments:      
U.S. Treasury Bills and Government Agency Securities 71,756
 34,107
 105,863
Commercial Paper 
 30,075
 30,075
Corporate Bonds 
 11,216
 11,216
CDs 
 5,429
 5,429
Long-term investments:      
U.S. Treasury Bills and Government Agency Securities 7,955
 9,436
 17,391
Corporate Bonds 
 19,059
 19,059
CDs 
 2,882
 2,882
Other current assets:      
Derivative assets 
 360
 360
Total assets measured at fair value $329,506
 $140,142
 $469,648
       
Accrued liabilities:      
Derivative liabilities $27
 $4,174
 $4,201
2012.

Refer to Note 16,15, Foreign Currency Derivatives, which discloses the nature of the Company's derivative assets and liabilities as of March 31, 20122013 and 2011.2012.


59


7.6.DETAILS OF CERTAIN BALANCE SHEET ACCOUNTS

Accounts receivable, net:

 March 31, March 31,
(in thousands) 2012 2011 2013 2012
Accounts receivable $133,233
 $125,137
 $151,250
 $133,233
Provisions for returns (7,613) (10,437) (8,957) (7,613)
Provisions for promotions, rebates and other (12,756) (10,460)
Provisions for promotions and rebates (13,675) (12,756)
Provisions for doubtful accounts and sales allowances (1,093) (951) (409) (1,093)
Accounts receivable, net $111,771
 $103,289
 $128,209
 $111,771

Inventory, net:

 March 31, March 31,
(in thousands) 2012 2011 2013 2012
Raw materials $14,062
 $15,315
 $28,743
 $14,062
Work in process 2,740
 2,558
 82
 2,740
Finished goods 36,911
 38,600
 38,610
 36,911
Inventory, net $53,713
 $56,473
 $67,435
 $53,713


60

Table of Contents

Property, plant, and equipment, net:

 March 31, March 31,
(in thousands) 2012 2011 2013 2012
Land $6,531
 $5,867
 $13,961
 $6,531
Buildings and improvements (useful life: 7-30 years) 67,417
 55,256
 72,263
 67,417
Machinery and equipment (useful life: 2-10 years) 90,643
 87,001
 88,538
 90,643
Software (useful life: 5-6 years) 28,951
 27,096
 30,538
 28,951
Construction in progress 2,323
 8,556
 16,101
 2,323
 195,865
 183,776
 221,401
 195,865
Accumulated depreciation and amortization (119,706) (113,154) (122,290) (119,706)
Property, plant and equipment, net $76,159
 $70,622
 $99,111
 $76,159

Depreciation and amortization expense for fiscal years 20122013, 2012, and 2011 andwas 2010$15.8 million was, $13.3 million, and $13.7 million, respectively. Included in depreciation and amortization expense in fiscal year 2013 is an immaterial amount of accelerated amortization in connection with restructuring activity in fiscal year 2013 related to leasehold improvement assets with no alternative future use.

Included in Software are unamortized capitalized software costs of $6.1 million and $16.4 million, respectively. In addition, the Company incurred $5.2 million of accelerated depreciation in fiscal year 2010 related to discontinued operations at its former Suzhou China facilities, which was included in Restructuring and other related charges on the Consolidated statements of operations.

Unamortized capitalized software costs were $6.7 million and $7.4 million at March 31, 20122013 and 20112012, respectively.  Amortization expense related to capitalized software costs in fiscal years 20122013, 20112012, and 20102011 was $3.12.9 million, $3.1 million, and $3.03.1 million, respectively.
 

60

Table of Contents

Accrued liabilities:

 March 31, March 31,
(in thousands) 2012 2011 2013 2012
Employee compensation and benefits $24,458
 $27,478
 $29,796
 $24,458
Warranty obligation 13,346
 11,016
 13,410
 13,346
Accrued advertising and sales and marketing 1,317
 2,873
 3,735
 1,317
Income taxes payable 3,376
 222
Restructuring and other related charges (1)
 1,165
 
Accrued other 12,946
 18,240
 14,937
 12,724
Accrued liabilities $52,067
 $59,607
 $66,419
 $52,067
(1) Refer to Note 8, Restructuring and Other Related Charges, for more information regarding the Company's restructuring activity.

Changes in the warranty obligation, which are included as a component of Accruedaccrued liabilities in the Consolidatedconsolidated balance sheets, are as follows:

 Year ended March 31, Year ended March 31,
(in thousands) 2012 2011 2013 2012
Warranty obligation at beginning of period $11,016
 $11,006
Warranty obligation at beginning of year $13,346
 $11,016
Warranty provision relating to products shipped during the year 17,061
 14,769
 16,287
 17,061
Deductions for warranty claims processed (14,731) (14,759) (16,223) (14,731)
Warranty obligation at end of period $13,346

$11,016
Warranty obligation at end of year $13,410

$13,346

8.7.GOODWILL AND PURCHASED INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill

The Company has goodwill of $14.0 millionGoodwill as of March 31, 20122013 and 2011March 31, 2012 was $15.5 million and there were no changes$14.0 million, respectively. The increase in goodwill relates to the carrying valueCompany's acquisition of all the equity interests in Tonalite B.V. ("Tonalite"), a product and design company that specialized in wireless wearable products and miniaturization technology, during the fiscal years then ended.year ended March 31, 2013. This acquisition was not material to the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In fiscal years 20122013 and 20112012, for purposes of the annual goodwill impairment test, the Company determined there to be no reporting units below its operating segment; therefore, the annual goodwill impairment analysis was performed at the segment level in both of these years.


61


In the fourth quarter of fiscal yearyears 2013 and 2012, the Company identifiedevaluated qualitative factors that may affect the fair value of the reporting unit including changes in the Company's industry, competitive environment, business strategy, and product mix; current and historical budgeted to actual performance; Company and peer market capitalization trends; macro-economic conditions and currency rate fluctuations. The Company also considered the results of its most recent fair value calculation and the amount by which the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded its carrying value, as well as the extent to which the inputs and assumptions in the fair value calculation would need to deteriorate in order for the reporting unit's fair value to fall below carrying value. Based on the assessment of the foregoing factors, the Company concluded there to be no indication of goodwill impairment.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011, the Company elected to use the fair value carry forward approach previously allowed under the Intangibles - Goodwill and Other Topic of the FASB ASC and determined each of the relevant criteria had been met. As a result of this determination, the Company concluded it was appropriate to carry forward the fair value from the valuation performed in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010 and concluded there to be no indication of goodwill impairment.

Purchased Intangible Assets

The following table presents the carrying value of purchased intangible assets with remaining net book values as of March 31, 20122013 and 20112012:

 March 31, 2012 March 31, 2011    March 31, 2013 March 31, 2012   
 Gross Accumulated Net Gross Accumulated Net    Gross Accumulated Net Gross Accumulated Net   
(in thousands) Amount Amortization Amount Amount Amortization Amount Useful Life Amount Amortization Amount Amount Amortization Amount Useful Life
Technology $3,000
 $(3,000) $
 $3,000
 $(2,812) $188
 6
years $1,000
 $(133) $867
 $
 $
 $
 5
years
Customer relationships 1,705
 (1,322) 383
 1,705
 (1,044) 661
 8
years 1,705
 (1,624) 81
 1,705
 (1,322) 383
 8
years
OEM relationships 27
 (27) 
 27
 (20) 7
 7
years
Total $4,732
 $(4,349) $383
 $4,732
 $(3,876) $856
    $2,705
 $(1,757) $948
 $1,705
 $(1,322) $383
   

Amortization expense relating to intangible assets was immaterial for fiscal yearyears 2013 and 2012, and was $2.6 million for fiscal year 2011 and 2010 was $2.6 million and $1.8 million, respectively..


61

The Company tests its indefinite lived intangible assets for impairment by comparing the fair value
Table of the intangible asset with its carrying value.  If the fair value is less than its carrying value, an impairment charge is recognized for the difference.  As of ContentsMarch 31, 2012, the Company had no indefinite lived intangible assets other than goodwill; however, the Company had previously reported indefinite lived intangible assets for which impairment or accelerated amortization charges were recorded in prior years presented in the Consolidated statements of operations and these are discussed below.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011, the Company finalized a long-term product development strategy and in doing so, evaluated the extent to which acquired technology would be used in future products. As part of this analysis, the Company elected to abandon certain of its acquired technology and therefore, recorded $1.4 million in accelerated amortization expense in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011 to reflect the revised estimate of the asset's useful life.

During the second quarter This accelerated amortization expense was recorded in cost of fiscal year 2010, management entered into a non-binding letter of intent to sell Altec Lansing, the Company’s AEG segment.  The Company concluded that this triggered an interim impairment review as it was now more likely than not that the segment would be sold; however, as the Company’s Board of Directors had not yet approved the sale of the segment, the assets did not qualify for “held for sale” accounting under the Property, Plant and Equipment Topic of the FASB ASC.  The Company tests its indefinite lived assets for impairment by comparing the fair value of the intangible asset with its carrying value.  If the fair value is less than its carrying value, an impairment charge is recognized for the difference.  The Company used the proposed purchase price of the AEG segment net assets per the non-binding letter of intent signed during the quarter as the fair value of the segment’s net assets.  This resulted in a full impairment of the Altec Lansing trademark and trade name; therefore, the Company recognized a non-cash impairment charge of $18.6 millionrevenues in the second quarterCompany's consolidated statements of fiscal year 2010 and recognized a deferred tax benefit of $7.1 million associated with this impairment charge, which is included in discontinued operations for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010.


62


As a result of the proposed purchase price of the net assets of the AEG segment, the Company also evaluated the long-lived assets within the reporting unit.  The fair value of the long-lived assets, which included purchased intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, was determined for each individual asset and compared to the asset’s relative carrying value.  This resulted in a full impairment of the AEG intangibles and a partial impairment of its property, plant and equipment; therefore, in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010, the Company recognized non-cash impairment charges of $6.6 million and $3.8 million related to purchased intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, respectively.   The Company recognized a deferred tax benefit of $2.5 million associated with these impairment charges.  The impairment charges and tax benefit are recorded in discontinued operations for the year ended March 31, 2010.operations.

9.8.RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER RELATED CHARGES

The Company recorded theaccounts for restructuring activities discussed below applying the guidance of eithercosts in accordance with the Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations Topic and the Compensation - Nonretirement Postemployment Benefits TopicTopics of the FASB ASC. The Company initiated a restructuring plan during the third quarter of fiscal year 2013.  Under the plan, the Company eliminated certain positions in the U.S., Mexico, China, and Europe, and transitioned some of these positions to lower cost locations.  The Company also plans to vacate a portion of a leased facility at its corporate headquarters in the first quarter of fiscal year 2014.  The Company expects to incur total pre-tax charges of approximately $3.1 million in connection with this plan. 

InThe pre-tax charges incurred during fiscal year 2009, the Company announced various restructuring activities that were completed as of December 31, 2010. These actions consisted of reductions in force throughout all of the Company's geographies along with a plan to close its manufacturing operations in its Suzhou, China facility due to the decision to outsource the manufacturing of Bluetooth products to a third party supplier in China. There were no restructuring charges during the years ended March 31, 2012 or 2011; however, in fiscal year 2011 the Company recorded an immaterial net gain upon the sale of a facility located in China impacted by the restructuring activities. In fiscal year 2010, the Company recorded restructuring charges of2013 included $1.9 million, consisting of for severance and related benefits alongand an immaterial amount of accelerated amortization expense on leasehold improvement assets with facilitiesno alternative future use. The Company expects to record $1.0 million for lease termination costs and equipment charges.the remaining accelerated depreciation on leasehold improvements when it exits the facility in the first quarter of fiscal year 2014.  The Company anticipates that the plan will be substantially complete by the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2014.

10.9.COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Minimum Future Rental Payments

The Company leases certain equipment and facilities under operating leases expiring in various years through fiscal year 2022. The terms of some of the Company's leases provide for rental payments on a graduated scale. The Company recognizes rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease period, and has accrued for rent expense incurred but not paid.  

Minimum future rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year as of March 31, 20122013 are as follows:

Fiscal Year Ending March 31, (in thousands) (in thousands)
2013 $5,355
2014 4,392
 $4,686
2015 1,649
 1,913
2016 887
 1,334
2017 241
 727
2018 650
Thereafter 686
 1,568
Total minimum future rental payments $13,210
 $10,878

Total rent expense for operating leases was approximately $5.95.6 million, $5.65.9 million, and $6.05.6 million in fiscal years 20122013, 20112012, and 20102011, respectively.

Certain operating leases provide for renewal options for periodsUnconditional Purchase Obligations

The Company purchases services and components from one to three years.  Ina variety of suppliers and manufacturers. During the normal course of business operating leases are generally renewed or replaced by other leases.

Indemnifications

The Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement ("Agreement") on October 2, 2009and to sell Altec Lansing, its AEG segment. Under the Agreement, as amended,manage manufacturing operations and general and administrative activities, the Company made representationsmay enter into firm, non-cancelable, and warranties tounconditional purchase obligations for which amounts are not recorded in the purchaser about the condition of AEG, including matters relating to intellectual property, taxes, employee or environmental matters, and fraud.  No indemnification costs have been recordedconsolidated balance sheets. Such unconditional purchase obligations totaled $182.5 million as of March 31, 2012 or March 31, 20112013.


6362


Other Guarantees and Obligations

TheIn the ordinary course of business, the Company sells substantially allmay provide indemnifications of its productsvarying scope and terms to end users through distributors, retailers, OEMs, and telephony service providers (collectively "customers"). As is customary in the Company’s industry and as provided for in local law in the U.S.customers, vendors, lessors, business partners, purchasers of assets or subsidiaries and other jurisdictions, Plantronics’ standard contracts provide remediesparties with respect to its customers, such as defense, settlement,certain matters, including, but not limited to, losses arising out of the Company's breach of agreements or payment of judgment forrepresentations and warranties made by the Company, services to be provided by the Company, intellectual property infringement claims made by third parties or, with respect to the sale of assets or a subsidiary, matters related to the useCompany's conduct of its products.the business and tax matters prior to the sale. From time to time, the Company indemnifies customers against combinations of loss, expense, or liability arising from various triggertriggering events relating to the sale and use of its products and services.  In addition, Plantronics also provides protection to customers against claims related to undiscovered liabilities, additional product liability, or environmental obligations.  In addition, the Company’s experience, claims madeCompany has entered into indemnification agreements with its directors and certain of its officers that will require the Company, among other things, to indemnify them against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors or officers. The Company maintains director and officer insurance, which may cover certain liabilities arising from its obligation to indemnify its directors and officers in certain circumstances. It is not possible to determine the aggregate maximum potential loss under these indemnifications are rareindemnification agreements due to the limited history of prior indemnification claims and the associated estimated fair valueunique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. Such indemnification agreements might not be subject to maximum loss clauses. Historically, the Company has not incurred material costs as a result of obligations under these agreements and it has not accrued any liabilities related to such indemnification obligations in the liability is not material.consolidated financial statements.

Claims and Litigation

On October 12, 2012, GN Netcom, Inc. sued Plantronics, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging violations of the Sherman Act, the Clayton Act, and Delaware common law. In its complaint, GN specifically alleges four causes of action: Monopolization, Attempted Monopolization, Concerted Action in Restraint of Trade, and Tortious Interference with Business Relations. GN claims that Plantronics dominates the market for headsets sold into contact centers in the United States and that a critical channel for sales of headsets to contact centers is through a limited network of specialized independent distributors (“SIDs”). GN asserts that Plantronics attracts SIDs through Plantronics Only Distributor Agreements and the use of these agreements is allegedly illegal. The Company denies each of the allegations in the complaint and is vigorously defending itself. Given the preliminary nature of the case, the Company is unable to estimate an amount or range of any reasonably possible losses resulting from these allegations.

In addition, the Company is involved in various legal proceedings arising in the normal course of conducting business. For such legal proceedings, where applicable, the Company has accrued an amount that reflects the aggregate liability deemed probable and estimable, but this amount is not material to the Company's financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. The Company is not able to estimate an amount or range of any reasonably possible additional losses because of the preliminary nature of many of these proceedings, the difficulty in ascertaining the applicable facts relating to many of these proceedings, the variable treatment of claims made in many of these proceedings, and the difficulty of predicting the settlement value of many of these proceedings;however, based upon the Company's historical experience, the resolution of these proceedings is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. The Company may incur substantial legal fees, which are expensed as incurred, in defending against these legal proceedings.

11.10. CREDIT AGREEMENT

InOn May 9, 2011, the Company entered into a credit agreement ("Credit Agreement") with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association ("the Bank")., which was most recently amended on May 3, 2013 to extend its term to May 9, 2016 (as amended, "the Credit Agreement") with the Bank. The Credit Agreement provides for a $100.0 million unsecured revolving line of credit ("line of credit") and, if requested by the Company, the Bank may increase its commitment thereunder by up to $100.0 million, for a total facility size of up to $200.0 million. As of March 31, 20122013, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the line of credit, compared with $37.0 million under the lineas of credit.March 31, 2012.

Loans under the Credit Agreement bear interest at the election of the Company (i) at the Bank's announced prime rate less 1.50% per annum, (ii) at a daily one month LIBOR rate plus 1.10% per annum or (iii) at an adjusted LIBOR rate, for a term of one, three or six months, plus 1.10% per annum. Interest on the loans is payable quarterly in arrears. In addition, the Company pays a fee equal to 0.20% per annum on the average daily unused amount of the line of credit, which is payable quarterly in arrears.

Principal, together with accrued and unpaid interest, is due on the amended maturity date, May 9, 20142016. The Company may prepay the loans and terminate the commitments in whole at any time, without premium or penalty, subject to reimbursement of certain costs in the case of LIBOR loans.

The Company's obligations under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by the Company's domestic subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions.

63


The line of credit requires the Company to comply with a maximum ratio of funded debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") and a minimum EBITDA coverage ratio, in each case at each fiscal quarter end and determined on a rolling four-quarter basis. In addition, the Company and its subsidiaries are required to maintain unrestricted cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities plus availability under the Credit Agreement at the end of each fiscal quarter of at least $200.0 million.

The line of credit contains affirmative covenants, including covenants regarding the payment of taxes and other liabilities, maintenance of insurance, reporting requirements, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. The line of credit also contains negative covenants, among other things, limiting, subject to certain monetary thresholds, the ability of the Company to incur debt, make capital expenditures, grant liens, make acquisitions, and make investments. The events of default under the line of credit include payment defaults, cross defaults with certain other indebtedness, breaches of covenants, judgment defaults, and bankruptcy and insolvency events involving the Company or any of its subsidiaries. The Company was in compliance with all covenants at March 31, 20122013.



64


12.11.STOCK PLANS AND STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Stock Plans

Stock options granted subsequent to September 2007 generally vest over a three-year period. Options granted from September 2004 to September 2007 generally vested over a four-year period. Restricted stock grants generally have vesting periods over three or four years, depending on the size of the grant. The Management Equity Committee is authorized to make option and restricted stock grants to employees who are not senior executives pursuant to guidelines approved by the Compensation Committee and subject to quarterly reporting to the Compensation Committee. The Company currently grants options and restricted stock from only the 2003 Stock Plan.  The Company settles stock option exercises and releases of vested restricted stock with newly issued common shares.

2003 Stock Plan
 
In June 2003, the Board of Directors ("Board") and stockholders approvedadopted the Plantronics, Inc. Parent Corporation 2003 Stock Plan (the "2003("2003 Stock Plan"). The 2003 Stock Plan, which has a term of 10 years (unless amended orwill continue in effect until terminated earlier by the Board) and is due to expire in September 2013, providesBoard, allows for incentivethe issuance of the Company's common stock options,through the granting of non-qualified stock options, restricted stock awards, stock appreciation rights, and restricted stock units.  As of March 31, 20122013, there have been 11,900,00012,900,000 shares of common stock (which number is subject to adjustment in the event of stock splits, reverse stock splits, recapitalization or certain corporate reorganizations) cumulatively reserved since inception underof the 2003 Stock Plan for issuance to employees, directors, and consultants of Plantronics.
 
Under the 2003 Stock Plan, allthe exercise price of stock options may not be granted at less than 100% of the estimated fair market value of the Company's common stock aton the date of grant. Incentive stock options may not be granted at less than 100%The term of the estimated fair market value of the Company's common stock at the date of grant, as determined by the Board, and thean option term may not exceed 7 years. Incentive stock options granted to a 10% stockholder may not be granted at less than 110% of the estimated fair market value of the common stock atyears from the date of grant and the option term may not exceed five years.it is granted.

Awards of restricted stock and restricted stock units with a per share or per unit purchase price less than the fair market value on the grant date that were granted from July 26, 2006 through August 4, 2011 are counted against the total number of shares issuable under the Plan as 2.5 shares for every 1 share subject thereto. No participant shall receive restricted stock awards in any fiscal year having an aggregate initial value greater than $2.0 million, and no participant shall receive restricted stock units in any fiscal year having an aggregate initial value greater than $2.0 million.

At March 31, 20122013, options to purchase 2,828,0872,146,033 shares of common stock and 951,247 shares of unvested restricted stock of 815,440 were outstanding, and there were 2,608,9413,121,721 shares available for future grant under the 2003 Stock Plan which takes into account the 2.5 ratio for grants of restricted stock during the specific time period as noted above.Plan.

1993 Stock Option Plan

In September 1993, the Board approvedadopted the Plantronics, Inc. Parent Corporation 1993 Stock Option Plan (the "1993("1993 Stock Option Plan"). Under the 1993 Stock Option Plan, there were 22,927,726 shares of common stock (which number is subject to adjustment in the event of stock splits, reverse stock splits, recapitalization, or certain corporate reorganizations) were cumulatively reserved since inception for issuance to employees and consultants of Plantronics. The 1993 Stock Option Plan, which providedallowed for the issuance of the Company's common stock through the granting of incentive stock options as well as nonqualifiednon-qualified stock options, to purchase shares of common stock, had a term of 10 years; therefore, the abilityauthority to grant new options under thisthe 1993 Stock Option Plan expired in September 2003.  At March 31, 20122013, options to purchase 475,788269,041 shares of common stock wereremained outstanding under the 1993 Stock Option Plan.
 

64


2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP")ESPP
 
On June 10, 2002, the Board approvedadopted the 2002 ESPP,Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP"), which was approved by the stockholders on July 17, 2002, to provide certaineligible employees with an opportunity to purchase Plantronics'the Company's common stock through payroll deductions. The planESPP qualifies under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. Under the 2002 ESPP, which is effective through June 2012,until terminated by the Board, the purchase price of Plantronics'the Company's common stock is equal to 85% of the lesser of the fair market value closing price of Plantronics'the common stock on (i) the first day of the offering period or (ii) the last day of the offering period. Each offering period is generally six months long.  There were 182,209158,596, 170,376182,209, and 281,598170,376, shares issued under the 2002 ESPP in fiscal years 20122013, 20112012, and 20102011, respectively.  At March 31, 20122013, there were 317,810459,214 shares reserved for future issuance under the 2002 ESPP. The total cash received from employees as a result of stock issuances under the ESPP during fiscal year 2013 was $4.8 million, net of taxes.


65


Stock-based Compensation

The following table summarizes the amount of stock-based compensation expense included in the Consolidatedconsolidated statements of operations for the periods presented:

  Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
(in thousands) 2012 2011 2010
Cost of revenues $2,212
 $2,202
 $1,929
       
Research, development and engineering 3,917
 3,765
 3,505
Selling, general and administrative 11,352
 9,906
 9,443
Stock-based compensation expense included in operating expenses 15,269
 13,671
 12,948
Total stock-based compensation 17,481
 15,873
 14,877
Income tax benefit (5,463) (4,892) (4,746)
Total stock-based compensation expense, net of tax $12,018
 $10,981
 $10,131

For the year ended March 31, 2010, stock-based compensation expense presented in the table above includes $1.2 million recorded in discontinued operations.

As of March 31, 2012, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options was $8.7 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.9 years. The total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock awards was $16.9 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.5 years.
  Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
(in thousands) 2013 2012 2011
Cost of revenues $2,020
 $2,212
 $2,202
       
Research, development and engineering 4,842
 3,917
 3,765
Selling, general and administrative 11,488
 11,352
 9,906
Stock-based compensation expense included in operating expenses 16,330
 15,269
 13,671
Total stock-based compensation 18,350
 17,481
 15,873
Income tax benefit (5,479) (5,463) (4,892)
Total stock-based compensation expense, net of tax $12,871
 $12,018
 $10,981

Stock Plan Activity

Stock Options

The following is a summary of the Company’s stock option activity during fiscal year 20122013:

Options OutstandingOptions Outstanding
Number of Shares Weighted Average Exercise Price Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life Aggregate Intrinsic ValueNumber of Shares Weighted Average Exercise Price Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life Aggregate Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)   (in years) (in thousands)(in thousands)   (in years) (in thousands)
Outstanding at March 31, 20115,360
 $25.58
    
Outstanding at March 31, 20123,304
 $26.47
    
Options granted654
 $34.93
    428
 $33.23
    
Options exercised(1,831) $20.88
    (1,110) $24.37
    
Options forfeited or expired(879) $38.96
    
(207) $34.45
    
Outstanding at March 31, 20123,304
 $26.47
 3.7
 $45,544
Vested and expected to vest at March 31, 20123,225
 $26.29
 3.6
 $45,044
Exercisable at March 31, 20122,316
 $23.79
 2.8
 $38,137
Outstanding at March 31, 20132,415
 $27.96
 3.6 $39,206
Vested and expected to vest at March 31, 20132,388
 $27.89
 3.6 $38,919
Exercisable at March 31, 20131,713
 $25.56
 2.7 $31,918

The total intrinsic values of stock options exercised during fiscal years 20122013, 2012, and 2011 andwere 2010$15.6 million were, $27.6 million, $26.2 millionand $9.026.2 million, respectively. Intrinsic value is defined as the amount by which the fair value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price at the time of option exercise. The total cash received from employees as a result of employee stock option exercises during fiscal year 20122013 was $38.227.0 million, net of taxes. The total net tax benefit attributable to stock options exercised during the year ended March 31, 2013 was $5.2 million.


6665


As of March 31, 2013, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options was $6.3 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.9 years.

Restricted Stock

Restricted stock consists of awards of restricted stock and restricted stock units ("RSUs"). The following is a summary of the Company’s restricted stock activity during fiscal year 20122013:

 Number of Shares Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
 (in thousands)  
Non-vested at March 31, 2011688
 $29.52
Granted391
 $36.37
Vested(202) $27.35
Forfeited(62) $30.91
Non-vested at March 31, 2012815
 $33.37
 Number of Shares Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
 (in thousands)  
Non-vested at March 31, 2012815
 $33.37
Restricted stock granted584
 $32.22
Restricted stock vested(254) $31.24
Restricted stock forfeited(120) $32.59
Non-vested at March 31, 20131,025
 $33.34

The weighted average grant-date fair value of restricted stock is based on the quoted market price of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. The weighted average grant-date fair values of restricted stock granted during fiscal years 20122013, 20112012 and 20102011 were $36.3732.22, $33.5436.37, and $24.6233.54, respectively. The total grant-date fair values of restricted stock that vested during fiscal years 20122013, 2012, and 2011 andwere 2010$7.9 million were, $5.5 million,$3.1 million and $3.1 million, respectively.

As of March 31, 2013, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock awards was $21.3 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.5 years.

Restricted stock granted during fiscal year 2013 included 74,298 shares of RSUs granted under a special stock inducement plan to former employees of Tonalite in connection with the Company's acquisition of all the equity interests in Tonalite during the year. The RSUs vest annually over four years, subject to the continued employment of the RSU holder on each vesting date. As future services are required, the fair value of the RSUs was not included in the acquisition consideration and the associated expense will be recognized over the post-acquisition requisite service period.

Valuation Assumptions
 
The Company estimates the fair value of stock options and ESPP shares using a Black-Scholes option valuation model.  TheAt the date of grant, the Company estimated the fair value of each stock option grant and purchase right granted under the stock options and ESPP shares granted during the respective periods is estimated on the date of grant using the following weighted average assumptions:

 Employee Stock Options ESPP Employee Stock Options ESPP
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2012 2011 2010 2012 2011 2010 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011
Expected volatility 45.3% 45.7% 53.7% 37.3% 38.7% 49.0% 41.8% 45.3% 45.7% 32.4% 37.3% 38.7%
Risk-free interest rate 1.0% 1.4% 2.0% 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 0.6% 1.0% 1.4% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2%
Expected dividends 0.6% 0.6% 1.0% 0.6% 0.6% 0.8% 1.2% 0.6% 0.6% 1.0% 0.6% 0.6%
Expected life (in years) 4.0
 4.2
 4.5
 0.5
 0.5
 0.5
 4.3
 4.0
 4.2
 0.5
 0.5
 0.5
Weighted-average grant date fair value $12.06
 $11.92
 $8.71
 $8.69
 $8.67
 $7.22
 $10.31
 $12.06
 $11.92
 $9.00
 $8.69
 $8.67


The Company recognizes the grant-date fair value
66


The expected stock price volatility for the years ended March 31, 20122013, 20112012, and 20102011 was determined based on an equally weighted average of historical and implied volatility.  Implied volatility is based on the volatility of the Company’s publicly traded options on its common stock with terms of six months or less.  The Company determined that a blend of implied volatility and historical volatility is more reflective of market conditions and a better indicator of expected volatility than using purelyexclusively historical volatility.  The expected life was determined based on historical experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms of the stock-based awards, vesting schedules, and expectations of future employee behavior.  The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods corresponding with the expected life of the option.  The dividend yield assumption is based on our current dividend and the market price of our common stock at the date of grant.



67


13.12. COMMON STOCK REPURCHASES

From time to time, the Company's Board authorizes programs under which the Company may repurchase shares of its common stock, depending on market conditions, in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. Repurchased shares are held as treasury stock until such time as they are retired or re-issued. During the years ended March 31, 2013, 2012 2011, and 2010,2011, the Company repurchased 8,027,287751,706, 3,315,0008,027,287, and 1,935,1003,315,000 shares of its common stock, respectively, for a total cost of $273.823.9 million, $105.5273.8 million, and $49.7105.5 million, respectively. All repurchases in fiscal years 2013 and 2011 were made in the open market. Of the total 8,027,287 shares repurchased in fiscal year 2012, 4,327,770 shares were repurchased in privately negotiated transactions and 3,699,517 shares were repurchased in the open market. All repurchases in fiscal years 2011 and 2010 were made in the open market. Repurchases by the Company pursuant to the Board authorized programs during fiscal years 2013, 2012 2011, and 20102011 are discussed in detail below. As of March 31, 20122013, there wereremained 633,613881,907 remaining shares authorized for repurchase.

Privately Negotiated Transactions

In May 2011, pursuant to a Board authorized accelerated share repurchase ("ASR") program, the Company entered into two separate Master Confirmation and Supplemental Confirmations (“May 2011 ASR Agreements”) with Goldman, Sachs & Co. (“Goldman”) consisting of a "Collared ASR Agreement" and an "Uncollared ASR Agreement". In August 2011, the Company entered into an additional Supplemental Confirmation with Goldman, consisting of an uncollared ASR ("August 2011 Uncollared ASR Agreement"). Details of these transactions are described further below.

In accordance with the Equity topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC"), the Company accounted for each agreement with Goldman as two separate transactions: (i) as shares of common stock acquired in a treasury stock transaction recorded on the acquisition date and (ii) as a forward contract indexed to the Company’s own common stock. As such, the Company accounted for the shares that it received under the May 2011 ASR Agreements andprogram approved by the Board on August 2011 Uncollared ASR Agreement as a repurchase of its common stock for the purpose of calculating earnings per common share. The Company has determined that the forward contracts indexed to the Company’s common stock met all of the applicable criteria for equity classification in accordance with the Derivatives and Hedging topic of the FASB ASC and, therefore, were not accounted for as derivative instruments.

May 2011 ASR Agreements

Under the May 2011 ASR Agreements, the Company paid Goldman $100.0 million in May 2011. As of March 31, 2012, Goldman delivered 2,831,519 shares of the Company's common stock under the Collared ASR and Uncollared ASR Agreements.

As of March 31, 2012, the Company received a total of 1,398,925 shares from Goldman under the Collared ASR Agreement at a total cost of $50.0 million and an average price per share of $35.74 based on the volume-weighted average price ("VWAP") of the Company's common stock during the term of the Collared ASR Agreement, less a discount.

As of March 31, 2012, the Company received a total of 1,432,594 shares from Goldman under the Uncollared ASR Agreement at a total cost of $50.0 million and an average price per share of $34.90 based on the VWAP of the Company's common stock during the term of the Uncollared ASR Agreement, less a discount.
August 2011 Uncollared ASR Agreement

Under the August 2011 Uncollared ASR Agreement, the Company paid Goldman $50.0 million in August 2011. As of March 31, 2012, the Company received a total of 1,496,251 shares from Goldman at a total cost of $50.0 million and an average price per share of $33.42 based on the VWAP of the Company's common stock during the term of the agreement, less a discount.6, 2012.

Open Market Repurchases

Under the Board authorized programs, during the years ended March 31, 20122013, 20112012, and 20102011, the Company repurchased 3,699,517751,706, 3,315,0003,699,517, and 1,935,1003,315,000 shares of its common stock, respectively, in the open market for a total cost of $123.823.9 million, $105.5123.8 million, and $49.7105.5 million, respectively, and an average price per share of $33.4631.84, $31.8333.46, and $25.6631.83, respectively. The Company financed the repurchases using a combination of funds generated from operations and borrowings under its revolving line of credit.

Privately Negotiated Transactions

68



In addition, the Company withheld shares valued at $2.63.0 million during the year ended March 31, 20122013, compared to$2.6 million in fiscal year 2012 and an immaterial amount in fiscal year 2011 and none in fiscal year 2010,, in satisfaction of employee tax withholding obligations upon the vesting of restricted stock granted under the Company's stock plans. The amounts withheld were equivalent to the employees' minimum statutory tax withholding requirements and are reflected as a financing activity within the Company's Consolidatedconsolidated statements of cash flows. These share withholdings have the effect of share repurchases by the Company asbecause they reduce the number of shares outstanding as a result of the vesting.

Treasury Stock Retirement

During the years ended March 31, 20122013, 20112012, and 20102011, the Company retired 5,000,0005,398,376, 4,000,0005,000,000, and 2,000,0004,000,000 shares of treasury stock, respectively, at a total value of 177.1$176.3 million, 102.4$177.1 million, and 56.2$102.4 million, respectively. These were non-cash equity transactions in which the cost of the reacquired shares was recorded as a reduction to both Retainedretained earnings and Treasurytreasury stock. TheThese shares were returned to the status of authorized but unissued shares.


67

14.

13. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

The components of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of associated tax impacts, were as follows:
 March 31, March 31,
(in thousands) 2012 2011 2013 2012
Accumulated unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges, net of an immaterial tax impact $1,904
 $(3,715)
Accumulated unrealized gain on cash flow hedges $1,349
 $1,904
Accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments 4,392
 5,181
 4,131
 4,392
Accumulated unrealized gain on investments, net of an immaterial tax impact 61
 7
Accumulated unrealized gain on investments 87
 61
Accumulated other comprehensive income  $6,357
 $1,473
 $5,567
 $6,357

15.14.EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

The Company has a defined contribution benefit plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, which covers substantially all U.S. employees. Eligible employees may contribute pre-tax amounts to the plan viathrough payroll withholdings, subject to certain limitations. Under the plan, the Company currently matches 50% of the first 6% of employees' compensation and provides a non-elective Company contribution equal to 3% of base salary. All matching contributions are currently 100% vested immediately. The Company reserves the right to modify its policies at any time, including increasing, decreasing, or eliminating contribution matching and vesting requirements. Total Company contributions in fiscal yearyears 2013, 2012, 2011and 20102011 were $3.84.0 million, $3.73.8 million, and $3.7 million, respectively.
 
16.15.FOREIGN CURRENCY DERIVATIVES

The Company uses derivative instruments primarily to manage exposures toCompany's foreign currency risks.derivatives consist primarily of foreign currency forward exchange contracts, option contracts, and cross-currency swaps.  The Company’s primary objective in holding derivatives is to reduce the volatility of earnings and cash flows associated with changes in foreign currency.  The program is not designed for trading or speculative purposes.  The Company’s derivatives expose the Company to credit risk to the extent that the counterparties may be unable to meet the terms of the agreements.derivative instrument.  The Company's maximum exposure to loss due to credit risk that it would incur if parties to derivative contracts failed completely to perform according to the terms of the contracts was equal to the carrying value of the Company's derivative contracts as of March 31, 2013.  The Company seeks to mitigate such risk by limiting its counterparties to major financial institutions and by spreading the risk across several majorlarge financial institutions.  In addition, the Company monitors, on an ongoing basis, the potential risk of loss with any one counterparty resulting from this type of credit risk is monitored on an ongoing basis.

In accordance with Derivatives and Hedging Topic of the FASB ASC, the Company recognizes derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet at fair value.  Changes in fair value (i.e., gains or losses) of the derivatives are recorded as Net revenues or Interest and other income (expense), net or as Accumulated other comprehensive income.

risk. Refer to Note 6,5, Fair Value Measurements, which disclosesfor disclosure of the Company's fair value hierarchy for its derivative instruments.


69


Non-Designated Hedges
The Company enters into foreign exchange forward contracts to reduce the impact of foreign currency fluctuations on assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the reporting entity.  These foreign exchange forward contracts are not subject to the hedge accounting provisions of the Derivatives and Hedging Topic of the FASB ASC, but are carried at fair value with changes in the fair value recorded within Interest and other income (expense), net in the Consolidated statements of operations in accordance with the Foreign Currency Matters Topic of the FASB ASC.  Gains and losses on these contracts are intended to offset the impact of foreign exchange rate changes on the underlying foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities, and therefore, do not subject the Company to material balance sheet risk.  The Company does not enter into foreign currency forward contracts for trading purposes.
 
As of March 31, 20122013, the Company had foreign currency forward contracts denominated in Euros ("EUR"), Great Britain Pounds ("GBP")EUR, GBP and Australian Dollars ("AUD"). These forward contracts hedge against a portion of the Company's foreign currency-denominated cash, balances, receivablesaccounts receivable, and payables.accounts payable balances. The following table summarizes the notional value of the Company’s outstanding foreign exchange currency contracts and approximate U.S. Dollar equivalent (“USD Equivalent”) at March 31, 20122013:

 Local Currency USD Equivalent Position Maturity
 (in thousands) (in thousands)    
EUR19,000
 $25,349
 Sell EUR 1 month
GBP3,600
 $5,756
 Sell GBP 1 month
AUD2,600
 $2,688
 Sell AUD 1 month

As of March 31, 2011, the notional value of the Company's foreign currency forward contracts was €18.0 million, £4.0 million and A$3.4 million denominated in EUR, GBP and AUD, respectively.
 Local Currency USD Equivalent Position Maturity
 (in thousands) (in thousands)    
EUR19,000
 $24,371
 Sell EUR 1 month
GBP4,800
 $7,277
 Sell GBP 1 month
AUD2,500
 $2,598
 Sell AUD 1 month

Foreign currency transactions, net of the effect of hedging activity on forward contracts, resulted in immaterial gainslosses in fiscal year 20122013, and immaterial gains in fiscal years 20112012 and 20102011, which are included in Interestinterest and other income (expense), net in the Consolidatedconsolidated statements of operations.

Cash Flow Hedges
 
The Company’s hedging activities include a hedging program to hedge the economic exposure from anticipated EUR and GBP denominated sales.  The Company hedges a portion of these forecasted foreign denominated sales with currency options.  These transactions are designated as cash flow hedges and are accounted for under the hedge accounting provisions of the Derivatives and Hedging Topic of the FASB ASC.  The effective portion of the hedge gain or loss is initially reported as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive income and subsequently reclassified into Net revenues when the hedged exposure affects earnings.  Any ineffective portion of related gains or losses is recorded in the Consolidated statements of operations immediately.  On a monthly basis, the Company enters into option contracts with a one-year term.  ItThe Company does not purchase options for trading purposes.  As of March 31, 2013, the Company had foreign currency put and call option contracts of approximately €50.2 million and £19.9 million.  As of March 31, 2012, the Company had foreign currency put and call option contracts of approximately €63.7 million and £20.0 million.  As

68

Table of ContentsMarch 31, 2011, it had foreign currency put and call option contracts of approximately €52.7 million and £14.5 million.

In fiscal year 2013, a realized gain of $3.4 million on cash flow hedges was recognized in net revenues in the consolidated statement of operations. In fiscal years 2012 and 2011, a realized loss of $2.4 million on cash flow hedges was recognized in Net revenues in the Consolidated statement of operations. In fiscal years 2011 and 2010, realized gains of $2.5 million and $1.8 million, respectively, on cash flow hedges were recognized in Netnet revenues in the Consolidatedconsolidated statements of operations.  The Company expects to reclassify the entireAn immaterial gain, of $1.2 million, net of tax, in Accumulated other comprehensive incomeAOCI as of March 31, 20122013 is expected to Netbe reclassified to net revenues during the next 12 months due to the recognition of the hedged forecasted sales.

The Company hedges expenditures denominated in Mexican Peso (“MX$”), which are designated as cash flow hedges and are accounted for under the hedge accounting provisions of the Derivatives and Hedging Topic of the FASB ASC. The Company hedges a portion of the forecasted MX$ denominated expenditures with a cross-currency swap.  The effective portion of the hedge gain or loss is initially reported as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive incomeAOCI and subsequently reclassified into Costcost of revenues when the hedged exposure affects operations.  Any ineffective portion of related gains or losses is immediately recorded in the Consolidatedconsolidated statements of operations immediately.operations. As of March 31, 20122013 and 20112012, the Company had foreign currency swap contracts of approximately MX$317.5325.4 million and MX$343.9317.5 million, respectively.


70


In fiscal years 20122013, 20112012, and 20102011, there were no material realized gains or losses on MX$ cash flow hedges recognized in Costcost of revenues in the Consolidatedconsolidated statements of operations and there were no material gains in Accumulated other comprehensive incomeAOCI as of March 31, 20122013 to be recognized during the next 12 months due to the recognition of the hedged forecasted expenditures.

The following table summarizes the notional value of the Company's outstanding MX$ currency swaps and approximate USD Equivalent at March 31, 20122013:

  Local Currency USD Equivalent Position Maturity
  (in thousands) (in thousands)    
MX$ 317,500
 $23,511
 Buy MX$ Monthly over 12 months
  Local Currency USD Equivalent Position Maturity
  (in thousands) (in thousands)     
MX$ 325,400
 25,222
 Buy MX$ Monthly over12 months

The amounts in the tables below include fair value adjustments related to the Company’s own credit risk and counterparty credit risk.

Fair Value of Derivative Contracts

The fair value of derivative contracts under the Derivatives and Hedging Topic of the FASB ASC was as follows:

 Derivative Assets Reported in Other Current Assets Derivative Liabilities Reported in Accrued Liabilities Derivative Assets Reported in Other Current Assets Derivative Liabilities Reported in Accrued Liabilities
(in thousands) March 31, 2012 March 31, 2011 March 31,
2012
 March 31,
2011
 March 31, 2013 March 31, 2012 March 31,
2013
 March 31,
2012
Foreign exchange contracts designated as cash flow hedges $2,658
 $360
 $721
 $4,201
 $1,665
 $2,658
 $294
 $721


69


Effect of Designated Derivative Contracts on Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

The following table represents only the balance of designated derivative contracts under the Derivatives and Hedging Topic of the FASB ASC as of March 31, 20122013 and 20112012 and the pre-tax impact of designated derivative contracts on Accumulatedaccumulated other comprehensive income ("OCI") for fiscal years ended March 31, 20122013 and 20112012:

(in thousands) Gain (loss) included in OCI as of March 31, 2011 Amount of gain (loss) recognized in OCI (effective portion) Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from OCI to income (loss) (effective portion) Gain (loss) included in OCI as of March 31, 2012 Gain (loss) included in AOCI as of March 31, 2012 Amount of gain (loss) recognized in AOCI (effective portion) Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI to income (loss) (effective portion) Gain (loss) included in AOCI as of March 31, 2013
Foreign exchange contracts designated as cash flow hedges $(3,814) $2,951
 $(2,800) $1,937
 $1,937
 $3,441
 $4,007
 $1,371
(in thousands) Gain (loss) included in OCI as of March 31, 2010 Amount of gain (loss) recognized in OCI (effective portion) Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from OCI to income (loss) (effective portion) Gain (loss) included in OCI as of March 31, 2011 Gain (loss) included in AOCI as of March 31, 2011 Amount of gain (loss) recognized in AOCI (effective portion) Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI to income (loss) (effective portion) Gain (loss) included in AOCI as of March 31, 2012
Foreign exchange contracts designated as cash flow hedges $2,771
 $(3,668) $2,917
 $(3,814) $(3,814) $2,951
 $(2,800) $1,937

Effect of Designated Derivative Contracts on the Consolidated Statements of Operations

The effect of designated derivative contracts under the Derivatives and Hedging Topic of the FASB ASC on results of operations recognized in Gross profitinterest and other income (expense), net in the Consolidatedconsolidated statements of operations was as follows:

 Fiscal Year Ended March 31, Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
(in thousands) 2012 2011 2010 2013 2012 2011
Gain (loss) on foreign exchange contracts designated as cash flow hedges $(2,800) $2,917
 $2,282
 $4,007
 $(2,800) $2,917


71


Effect of Non-Designated Derivative Contracts on the Consolidated Statements of Operations

The effect of non-designated derivative contracts under the Derivatives and Hedging Topic of the FASB ASC on results of operations recognized in Interestinterest and other income (expense), net in the Consolidatedconsolidated statements of operations was as follows:

 Fiscal Year Ended March 31, Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
(in thousands) 2012 2011 2010 2013 2012 2011
Gain (loss) on foreign exchange contracts $1,009
 $(1,800) $(996) $1,065
 $1,009
 $(1,800)


70


17.16.INCOME TAXES

Income tax expense from continuing operations for fiscal years 20122013, 20112012, and 20102011 consisted of the following:

(in thousands) Fiscal Year Ended March 31, Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
 2012 2011 2010 2013 2012 2011
Current:  
  
    
  
  
Federal $23,844
 $22,601
 $17,761
 $25,530
 $23,844
 $22,601
State 2,719
 1,077
 2,290
 2,452
 2,719
 1,077
Foreign 5,080
 5,888
 7,241
 4,777
 5,080
 5,888
Total current provision for income taxes 31,643
 29,566
 27,292
 32,759
 31,643
 29,566
Deferred:    
  
    
  
Federal 2,324
 475
 (2,841) (586) 2,324
 475
State (569) 1,262
 (199) (474) (569) 1,262
Foreign 168
 110
 35
 324
 168
 110
Total deferred benefit for income taxes 1,923
 1,847
 (3,005) (736) 1,923
 1,847
Income tax expense from continuing operations $33,566
 $31,413
 $24,287
Income tax expense $32,023
 $33,566
 $31,413

The components of income from continuing operations before income taxes for fiscal years 20122013, 20112012, and 20102011 are as follows:

 Fiscal Year Ended March 31, Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
(in thousands) 2012 2011 2010 2013 2012 2011
United States $79,589
 $75,426
 $51,392
 $80,875
 $79,589
 $75,426
Foreign 63,013
 65,230
 49,348
 57,550
 63,013
 65,230
Income from continuing operations before income taxes $142,602
 $140,656
 $100,740
Income before income taxes $138,425
 $142,602
 $140,656

The following is a reconciliation between statutory federal income taxes and the income tax expense from continuing operations for fiscal years 20122013, 20112012, and 20102011:

(in thousands) Fiscal Year Ended March 31, Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
 2012 2011 2010 2013 2012 2011
Tax expense at statutory rate $49,911
 $49,229
 $35,259
 $48,449
 $49,911
 $49,229
Foreign operations taxed at different rates (16,973) (16,308) (11,166) (15,244) (16,973) (16,308)
State taxes, net of federal benefit 2,149
 2,340
 2,091
 1,978
 2,149
 2,340
Research and development credit (1,392) (3,234) (1,383) (3,380) (1,392) (3,234)
Other, net (129) (614) (514) 220
 (129) (614)
Income tax expense from continuing operations $33,566
 $31,413
 $24,287
Income tax expense $32,023
 $33,566
 $31,413

The effective tax rate for fiscal years 2013, 2012, and 2011 was 23.1%, 23.5%, and 22.3% respectively.  The effective tax rate for fiscal year 2013 is lower than the previous year due primarily to the increased benefit from the U.S. federal research tax credit in fiscal year 2013, offset by a smaller proportion of income earned in foreign jurisdictions that is taxed at lower rates. The U.S. federal research credit was reinstated in January 2013 retroactively to January 2012; therefore, the effective tax rate for fiscal year 2013 includes the benefit of the credit earned in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to the benefit of the credit for only three quarters in fiscal 2012.

In comparison to fiscal year 2011, the increase in the effective tax rate for fiscal year 2012 was due primarily to the reduced benefit from the U.S. federal research tax credit because the credit expired in December 2011; therefore, the effective tax rate in fiscal year 2012 included the benefit of the credit for only three quarters.


7271


The effective tax rate for fiscal years 20122013, 2011 and 2010 was 23.5%, 22.3%2012, and 24.1% respectively.  The effective tax rate for fiscal year 2012 is higher than the previous year due primarily to the reduced benefit from the U.S. federal research tax credit in fiscal year 2012 as the credit expired in December 2011; therefore, the effective tax rate for fiscal year 2012 included the benefit of the credit for only three quarters. Because the credit was reinstated in December 2010 retroactively to January 1, 2010, the effective tax rate for fiscal year 2011 includes the impact of credits earned in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010.

In comparison to fiscal year 2010, the decrease in the effective tax rate for fiscal year 2011 was due primarily to the increased benefit from the U.S. Federal research tax credit.

The effective tax rate for fiscal years 2012, 2011 and 2010 differs from the statutory rate due to the impact of foreign operations taxed at different statutory rates, income tax credits, state taxes, and other factors.  The future tax rate could be impacted by a shift in the mix of domestic and foreign income, tax treaties with foreign jurisdictions, changes in tax laws in the U.S. or internationally, or a change in estimate of future taxable income which could result in a valuation allowance being required.

Permanently reinvested foreign earnings were approximately $491.0 million at March 31, 2012. The determination of the tax liability that would be incurred if these amounts were remitted back to the U.S. is not practical but would likely be material. The Company's provision for income taxes does not include provisions for U.S. income taxes and foreign withholding taxes associated with the repatriation of undistributed earnings of certain foreign operations that it intends to reinvest indefinitely in the foreign operations. Permanently reinvested foreign earnings were approximately $545.6 million at March 31, 2013. The determination of the tax liability that would be incurred if these amounts were remitted back to the U.S. is not practical but would likely be material. If these earnings were distributed to the U.S. in the form of dividends or otherwise, the Company would be subject to additional U.S. income taxes, subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits and foreign withholding taxes. The Company's current plans do not require repatriation of earnings from foreign operations to fund the U.S. operations because it generates sufficient domestic operating cash flow and has access to external funding under its line of credit. As a result, the Company does not expect a material impact on its business or financial flexibility with respect to undistributed earnings of its foreign operations.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and income tax purposes.  Significant components of ourthe Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities as of March 31, 20122013 and 20112012 are as follows:

 March 31, March 31,
(in thousands) 2012 2011 2013 2012
Accruals and other reserves $9,822
 $9,850
 $7,983
 $9,822
Net operating loss carry forward 6,317
 5,095
 5,956
 6,317
Stock compensation 1,388
 5,519
 8,199
 1,388
Other deferred tax assets 3,561
 4,417
 3,643
 3,561
Valuation allowance (6,088) (5,274) (5,984) (6,088)
Total deferred tax assets 15,000
 19,607
 19,797
 15,000
Deferred gains on sales of properties (1,881) (1,954) (1,756) (1,881)
Purchased intangibles (143) (323) (11) (143)
Unremitted earnings of certain subsidiaries (3,064) (3,064) (3,064) (3,064)
Fixed asset depreciation (5,309) (4,244) (4,402) (5,309)
Other deferred tax liabilities (2,186) (2,199) (2,186) (2,186)
Total deferred tax liabilities (12,583) (11,784) (11,419) (12,583)
Net deferred tax assets $2,417
 $7,823
 $8,378
 $2,417

The Company evaluates its deferred tax assets, including a determination of whether a valuation allowance is necessary, based upon its ability to utilize the assets using a more likely than not analysis.  Deferred tax assets are only recorded to the extent that they are realizable based upon past and future income.  The Company has a long established earnings history with taxable income in its carryback years and forecasted future earnings.  The Company has concluded thatno valuation allowance is required, except for the specific items discussed below, no valuation allowance is required.below.

The valuation allowance of $6.16.0 million million as of March 31, 20122013 was related to the net operating losses of a foreign subsidiary with an insufficient history of earnings to support the realization of the deferred tax asset and for another foreign subsidiary with uncertain utilization of research incentives.

73


The impact of an uncertain income tax position on income tax expense must be recognized at the largest amount that is more-likely-than-notmore likely than not to be sustained.  An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized unless it has a greater than 50% likelihood of being sustained.  As of March 31, 20122013, 20112012, and 20102011, the Company had $11.1 million, $10.511.1 million, and $11.210.5 million, respectively, of unrecognized tax benefits.  The unrecognized tax benefits as of March 31, 20122013 would favorably impact the effective tax rate in future periods if recognized.


72


A reconciliation of the change in the amount of gross unrecognized income tax benefits for the periods is as follows:

 March 31, March 31,
(in thousands) 2012 2011 2010 2013 2012 2011
Balance at beginning of period $10,458
 $11,201
 $11,090
 $11,141
 $10,458
 $11,201
Increase (decrease) of unrecognized tax benefits related to prior years 116
 (960) 100
 (117) 116
 (960)
Increase of unrecognized tax benefits related to the current year 2,074
 2,185
 2,016
 2,430
 2,074
 2,185
Reductions to unrecognized tax benefits related to lapse of applicable statute of limitations (1,507) (1,968) (2,005) (2,382) (1,507) (1,968)
Balance at end of period $11,141
 $10,458
 $11,201
 $11,072
 $11,141
 $10,458

The Company's continuing practice is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. The interest related to unrecognized tax benefits was $2.0 million and $1.7 million as of March 31, 20122013 and 2011.2012, respectively. No penalties have been accrued.

The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to taxation in various foreign and state jurisdictions, as well as inincluding the U.S.  The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal tax examinations by tax authorities for tax years prior to 2009.  The Company is under examination by the Internal Revenue Service for its 2010 tax year and the California Franchise Tax Board for its 2007 and 2008 tax years.  Foreign income tax matters for material tax jurisdictions have been concluded for tax years prior to fiscal 2006, except for the United Kingdom, which has been concluded for tax years prior to fiscal year 2010.2012.

The Company believes that an adequate provision has been made for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations; however, the outcome of such examinations cannot be predicted with certainty. If any issues addressed in the tax examinations are resolved in a manner inconsistent with the Company's expectations, the Company could be required to adjust its provision for income tax in the period such resolution occurs. Although timing of any resolution and/or closure of tax examinations is not certain, the Company does not believe it is reasonably possible that its unrecognized tax benefits would materially change in the next twelve months.



74



18.
17.

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE

The Company has a share-based compensation plan under which employees may be granted share-based awards, including shares of restricted stock on which non-forfeitable dividends are paid on unvested shares. As such, shares of restricted stock are considered participating securities under the two-class method of calculating earnings per share as described in the Earnings per Share Topic of the FASB ASC. The two-class method of calculating earnings per share did not have a material impact on the Company's earnings per share calculation as of March 31, 20132012, and 2011.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share:

(in thousands, except earnings per share data) Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
  2012 2011 2010
Income from continuing operations, net of tax $109,036
 $109,243
 $76,453
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax 
 
 (19,075)
Net income $109,036
 $109,243
 $57,378
       
Weighted average shares-basic 44,023
 47,713
 48,504
Dilutive effect of employee equity incentive plans 1,242
 1,631
 827
Weighted average shares-diluted 45,265
 49,344
 49,331
       
Earnings (loss) per common share    
  
Basic    
  
Continuing operations $2.48
 $2.29
 $1.58
Discontinued operations 
 
 (0.39)
Net income $2.48
 $2.29
 $1.18
       
Diluted    
  
Continuing operations $2.41
 $2.21
 $1.55
Discontinued operations 
 
 (0.39)
Net income $2.41
 $2.21
 $1.16
       
Potentially dilutive securities excluded from earnings per diluted share because their effect is anti-dilutive 1,199
 1,606
 4,902
(in thousands, except earnings per share data) Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
  2013 2012 2011
Numerator:      
Net income $106,402
 $109,036
 $109,243
       
Denominator:      
Weighted average common shares-basic 41,748
 44,023
 47,713
Dilutive effect of employee equity incentive plans 990
 1,242
 1,631
Weighted average shares-diluted 42,738
 45,265
 49,344
       
Basic earnings per common share $2.55
 $2.48
 $2.29
Diluted earnings per common share $2.49
 $2.41
 $2.21
       
Potentially dilutive securities excluded from earnings per diluted share because their effect is anti-dilutive 1,038
 1,199
 1,606
 

73


19.18.GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

The Company designs, manufactures, markets, and sells headsets for business and consumer applications, and other specialty products for the hearing impaired.  With respect to headsets, it makes products for use in offices and contact centers, with mobile and cordless phones, and with computers and gaming consoles.  Major product categories include “Office and Contact Center”, which includes corded and cordless communication headsets, audio processors, and telephone systems; “Mobile”, which includes Bluetooth and corded products for mobile phone applications; “Gaming and Computer Audio”, which includes personal computer ("PC") and gaming headsets; and “Clarity”, which includes specialty products marketed for hearing impaired individuals.

The following table presents Netnet revenues by product group:

 Fiscal Year Ended March 31, Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
(in thousands) 2012 2011 2010 2013 2012 2011
Net revenues from unaffiliated customers:  
  
  
  
  
  
Office and Contact Center $531,709
 $490,472
 $404,397
 $549,301
 $531,709
 $490,472
Mobile 131,825
 137,530
 149,756
 163,460
 131,825
 137,530
Gaming and Computer Audio 31,855
 36,736
 39,260
 30,747
 31,855
 36,736
Clarity 17,979
 18,864
 20,424
 18,718
 17,979
 18,864
Total net revenues $713,368
 $683,602
 $613,837
 $762,226
 $713,368
 $683,602
 

75


For reporting purposes, revenue is attributed to each geographic region based on the location of the customer. Other than the U.S., no country accounted for 10% or more of the Company's net revenues for the years ended March 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011. The following table presents Netnet revenues by geography:

 Fiscal Year Ended March 31, Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
(in thousands) 2012 2011 2010 2013 2012 2011
Net revenues from unaffiliated customers:  
  
  
  
  
  
U.S. $406,233
 $400,292
 $378,119
 $436,447
 $406,233
 $400,292
            
Europe, Middle East and Africa 181,761
 169,521
 148,070
Europe and Africa 181,439
 177,157
 165,800
Asia Pacific 74,249
 62,697
 46,494
 92,193
 78,853
 66,419
Americas, excluding U.S. 51,125
 51,092
 41,154
 52,147
 51,125
 51,091
Total International net revenues 307,135
 283,310
 235,718
 325,779
 307,135
 283,310
Total net revenues $713,368
 $683,602
 $613,837
 $762,226
 $713,368
 $683,602

No customer accounted for 10% or more of total Netnet revenues for fiscal years 20122013, 2011 and 20102012, nor did any one customer account for 10% or more of Accounts receivable, net at March 31, 2012or March 31, 2011.

The following table presents long-lived assets by geographic area on a consolidated basis:

 Fiscal Year Ended March 31, Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
(in thousands) 2012 2011 2013 2012
U.S. $70,808
 $65,899
 $62,263
 $56,420
Mexico 6,728
 7,293
 24,033
 6,728
Other countries 13,011
 12,291
 12,815
 13,011
Total Long-lived assets $90,547
 $85,483
Total long-lived assets $99,111
 $76,159


20.
19.

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Dividend Declaration
On May 1, 20127, 2013, the Board declared a cash dividend of $0.10 per share of the Company's common stock, payable on June 8, 201210, 2013 to stockholders of record on May 18, 201220, 2013.








7674


SUPPLEMENTARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA
(Unaudited)

Each of the Company's fiscal years ends on the Saturday closest to the last day of March.  The Company's fiscal years 20122013 and 20112012 consist of 52 weeks. Our interim fiscal quarters for the first, second, third, and fourth quarter of fiscal year 2013 ended on June 30, 2012, September 29, 2012, December 29, 2012, and March 30, 2013, respectively, and our interim fiscal quarters for the first, second, third, and fourth quarter of fiscal year 2012 ended on July 2, 2011, October 1, 2011, December 31, 2011, and March 31, 2012, respectively, and our interim fiscal quarters for the first, second, third and fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011 ended on July 3, 2010, October 2, 2010, January 1, 2011 and April 2, 2011, respectively. For purposes of presentation, the Company has indicated its accounting fiscal year as ending on March 31 and our interim quarterly periods as ending on the last calendar day of the applicable month end.

Quarter EndedQuarter Ended
March 31,
2012
 December 31,
2011
 September 30,
2011
 June 30,
2011
March 31, 2013 
December 31, 2012 1
 September 30,
2012
 June 30,
2012
(in thousands, except per share data)(in thousands, except per share data)
Net revenues$177,584
 $183,236
 $176,948
 $175,600
$204,179
 $197,402
 $179,280
 $181,365
Gross profit$95,115
 $96,212
 $98,966
 $94,058
$106,093
 $102,164
 $97,228
 $97,696
Net income$23,886
 $30,898
 $27,521
 $26,731
$28,709
 $28,206
 $25,924
 $23,563
Basic net income per common share$0.57
 $0.73
 $0.62
 $0.57
$0.68
 $0.68
 $0.62
 $0.57
Diluted net income per common share$0.55
 $0.71
 $0.60
 $0.56
$0.67
 $0.66
 $0.61
 $0.55
Cash dividends declared per common share$0.05
 $0.05
 $0.05
 $0.05
$0.10
 $0.10
 $0.10
 $0.10
Quarter EndedQuarter Ended
March 31, 2011 1
 December 31,
2010
 September 30, 2010 June 30, 2010March 31, 2012 December 31,
2011
 September 30, 2011 June 30, 2011
(in thousands, except per share data)(in thousands, except per share data)
Net revenues$173,077
 $181,585
 $158,255
 $170,685
$177,584
 $183,236
 $176,948
 $175,600
Gross profit$90,541
 $95,808
 $85,959
 $89,448
$95,115
 $96,212
 $98,966
 $94,058
Net income$26,316
 $31,552
 $25,429
 $25,946
$23,886
 $30,898
 $27,521
 $26,731
Basic net income per common share$0.55
 $0.66
 $0.54
 $0.54
$0.57
 $0.73
 $0.62
 $0.57
Diluted net income per common share$0.53
 $0.64
 $0.52
 $0.52
$0.55
 $0.71
 $0.60
 $0.56
Cash dividends declared per common share$0.05
 $0.05
 $0.05
 $0.05
$0.05
 $0.05
 $0.05
 $0.05
 
1 
DuringWe initiated a restructuring plan during the fourththird quarter of fiscal year 2011,2013. Under the Company recognized a gainplan, we eliminated certain positions in the US., Mexico, China, and Europe, and transitioned some of these positions to lower cost locations. The pre-tax charges incurred during fiscal year 2013 included $5.11.9 million for severance and related to a binding settlement agreement with a competitor to dismiss litigation involving the alleged theftbenefits and an immaterial amount of the Company's trade secrets and received payment in the same quarter. In addition, the Company recorded $1.4 million in accelerated amortization expense to reflect the revised estimated useful life of an intangible asset the Company deemed to be abandoned.on leasehold assets with no alternative future use.




7775


ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
 
There have been no disagreements with accountants on any matter of accounting principles and practices or financial disclosure. 

ITEM 9A.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
 
Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-K.  Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to Plantronics’ management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management.  Our disclosure controls and procedures include components of our internal control over financial reporting.  Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting is expressed at the level of reasonable assurance because a control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met.
 
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended).  Our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”).  Based on this evaluation, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of March 31, 2012.2013.  The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, has issued a report on our internal control over financial reporting, which appears on page 4746 of this Form 10-K.
 
Changes in internal control over financial reporting
 
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 20122013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. 

ITEM 9B.  OTHER INFORMATION
 
None.


7876


PART III
 
ITEM 10.  DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
 
The information regarding the identification and business experience of our directors under the captions "Nominees" and “Business Experience of Directors” under the main caption "Proposal One – Election of Directors" in our definitive 20122013 Proxy Statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on or about August 10, 20121, 2013 (“20122013 Proxy Statement”), expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about June 22, 201211, 2013, is incorporated in this Item 10 by reference.  For information regarding the identification and business experience of our executive officers, see "Employees" at the end of Item 1 in Part I of this Form 10-K. Information regarding the standing audit committee and names of the financial expert(s) in the audit committee, under the caption "Corporate Governance” subhead “Audit Committee" in our 20122013 Proxy Statement is incorporated into this Item 10 by reference.  Information concerning filing requirements applicable to our executive officers and directors under the caption "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in our 20122013 Proxy Statement is incorporated into this Item 10 by reference.
 
Code of Ethics
 
Plantronics has adopted a Code of Conduct (the “Code”), which applies to all Plantronics’ employees, including directors and officers.  The Code is posted on the Plantronics’ corporate website under the Corporate Governance section of the Company portal (www.plantronics.com).  We intend to disclose future amendments to the Code, or any waivers of such provisions granted to executive officers and directors, on this web sitewebsite within four business days following the date of such amendment or waiver.
 
Stockholders may request a free copy of the Code from our Investor Relations department as follows:
 
Plantronics, Inc.
345 Encinal Street
Santa Cruz, California 95060
Attn: Investor Relations
(831) 426-5858
 
Corporate Governance Guidelines
 
Plantronics has adopted the Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are available on Plantronics' website under the Corporate Governance portal in the Company section of our website at www.plantronics.com.  Stockholders or any interested party may request a free copy of the Corporate Governance Guidelines by contacting us at the address and phone numbers set forth above under “Code of Ethics.”
 
ITEM 11.  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
 
The information required under this item is included under the captions "Executive Compensation", "Compensation of Directors", “Report of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors” and “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” in our 20122013 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
 
ITEM 12.  SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
 
The information required by this item is included under the captions “Equity Compensation Plan Information” under the main caption “Proposal ThreeTwo – Approval of Amendments to the 2002 Employee2003 Stock Purchase Plan”, and "Security Ownership of Principal Stockholders and Management" under the main caption "Additional Information" in our 20122013 Proxy Statement and is incorporated into this Item 12 by this reference.

ITEM 13.  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information required by this item is included under the caption "Corporate Governance” subhead “Director Independence" in the 20122013 Proxy Statement and is incorporated into this Item 13 by this reference.
 

7977



ITEM 14.  PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
 
The information required by this item is included under the caption "Proposal FourThree - Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in our 20122013 Proxy Statement and is incorporated in this Item 14 by this reference.

8078


PART IV

 
ITEM 15.  EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
 
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this Form 10-K:
 
(1)
Financial Statements.  The following consolidated financial statements and supplementary information and Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm are included in Part II of this Report.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 

8179


(2)Financial Statement Schedules.
PLANTRONICS, INC.
SCHEDULE II: VALUATION AND QUALIFYING
ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES
(in thousands)

 Balance at Beginning of Year Charged to Expenses or Other Accounts Deductions Balance at End of Year
Provision for doubtful accounts and sales allowances: 
  
  
  
Year ended March 31, 2012$951
 $758
 $(616) $1,093
Year ended March 31, 20112,279
 (8) (1,320) 951
Year ended March 31, 20104,011
 (243) (1,489) 2,279
        
Provision for returns: 
  
  
  
Year ended March 31, 2012$10,437
 $16,660
 $(19,484) $7,613
Year ended March 31, 201113,812
 21,910
 (25,285) 10,437
Year ended March 31, 20107,592
 30,417
 (24,197)
1 
13,812
        
Provision for promotions, rebates and other: 
  
  
  
Year ended March 31, 2012$10,460
 $34,170
 $(31,874) $12,756
Year ended March 31, 201113,780
 36,885
 (40,205) 10,460
Year ended March 31, 201022,961
 41,237
 (50,418)
1 
13,780
        
Warranty obligation: 
  
  
  
Year ended March 31, 2012$11,016
 $17,061
 $(14,731) $13,346
Year ended March 31, 201111,006
 14,769
 (14,759) 11,016
Year ended March 31, 201012,424
 14,482
 (15,900)
1 
11,006
        
Valuation Allowance for Deferred Tax Assets:       
Year ended March 31, 2012$5,274
 $1,259
 $(445) $6,088
Year ended March 31, 20111,399
 4,659
 (784) 5,274
Year ended March 31, 2010123
 1,342
 (66) 1,399

1
Deductions include the following amounts assumed by the purchaser as part of the sale of Altec Lansing on December 1, 2009:
Provision for returns$(1,440)
Provision for promotions, rebates and other$(3,284)
Warranty reserves$(383)
 Balance at Beginning of Year Charged to Expenses or Other Accounts Deductions Balance at End of Year
Provision for doubtful accounts and sales allowances: 
  
  
  
Year ended March 31, 2013$1,093
 $468
 $(1,152) $409
Year ended March 31, 2012951
 758
 (616) 1,093
Year ended March 31, 20112,279
 (8) (1,320) 951
        
Provision for returns: 
  
  
  
Year ended March 31, 2013$7,613
 $21,111
 $(19,767) $8,957
Year ended March 31, 201210,437
 16,660
 (19,484) 7,613
Year ended March 31, 201113,812
 21,910
 (25,285) 10,437
        
Provision for promotions and rebates: 
  
  
  
Year ended March 31, 2013$12,756
 $33,343
 $(32,424) $13,675
Year ended March 31, 201210,460
 34,170
 (31,874) 12,756
Year ended March 31, 201113,780
 36,885
 (40,205) 10,460
        
Inventory reserves:       
Year ended March 31, 2013$5,712
 $1,089
 $(2,026) $4,775
Year ended March 31, 20127,423
 2,154
 (3,865) 5,712
Year ended March 31, 201112,044
 1,083
 (5,704) 7,423
        
Warranty obligation: 
  
  
  
Year ended March 31, 2013$13,346
 $16,287
 $(16,223) $13,410
Year ended March 31, 201211,016
 17,061
 (14,731) 13,346
Year ended March 31, 201111,006
 14,769
 (14,759) 11,016
        
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets:       
Year ended March 31, 2013$6,088
 $89
 $(193) $5,984
Year ended March 31, 20125,274
 1,259
 (445) 6,088
Year ended March 31, 20111,399
 4,659
 (784) 5,274

All other schedules have been omitted because the required information is either not present or not present in the amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

8280


3. Exhibits.  See Item 15(b) below.
 
(b)  Exhibits
 
We have filed, or incorporated by reference into this Report, the exhibits listed on the accompanying Index to Exhibits immediately following the signature page of this Form 10-K.
 
(c) Financial Statement Schedules
 
See Items 8 and 15(a) (2) above.

8381


SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
 
    
May 25, 201224, 2013PLANTRONICS, INC.
   
 By:/s/ Ken Kannappan
 Name:Ken Kannappan
 Title:Chief Executive Officer

POWER OF ATTORNEY
 
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS:
 
That the undersigned officers and directors of Plantronics, Inc., a Delaware corporation, do hereby constitute and appoint Ken Kannappan and Barbara Scherer,Pamela Strayer, or either of them, the lawful attorney-in-fact, with full power of substitution, for him in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact or his substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
SignatureTitleDate
   
/s/ Ken Kannappan
(Ken Kannappan)
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)May 25, 201224, 2013
   
/s/ Barbara SchererPam Strayer
(Barbara Scherer)Pam Strayer)
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)May 25, 201224, 2013
   
/s/ Marv Tseu
(Marv Tseu)
Chairman of the Board and DirectorMay 25, 201224, 2013
   
/s/ Brian Dexheimer
(Brian Dexheimer)
DirectorMay 25, 201224, 2013
   
/s/ Robert Hagerty(Robert Hagerty)
DirectorMay 25, 201224, 2013
   
/s/ Gregg Hammann
(Gregg Hammann)
DirectorMay 25, 201224, 2013
   
/s/ John Hart
(John Hart)
DirectorMay 25, 201224, 2013
   
/s/ Marshall Mohr
(Marshall Mohr)
DirectorMay 25, 201224, 2013


8482


EXHIBITS INDEX
    Incorporation by Reference  
Exhibit Number Exhibit Description Form File No. Exhibit Filing Date Filed Herewith
2.1 Asset Purchase Agreement, dated October 2, 2009, by and among Plantronics, Inc., Plantronics, B.V., and Audio Technologies Acquisition, LLC. 10-Q 001-12696 2.1 1/27/2010  
             
2.1.1 First Amendment to Asset Purchase Agreement, dated November 30, 2009, by and among Plantronics, Inc., Plantronics, B.V., Altec Lansing, LLC (f/k/a Audio Technologies Acquisition, LLC) and Audio Technologies Acquisition B.V. 10-Q 001-12696 2.1.1 1/27/2010  
             
2.1.2 Side Letter, dated January 8, 2010, to the Asset Purchase Agreement, dated October 2, 2009, by and among Plantronics, Inc., Plantronics, B.V., and Audio Technologies Acquisition, LLC., as amended by that certain First Amendment to Asset Purchase Agreement, dated November 30, 2009, by and among Plantronics, Inc., Plantronics, B.V., Altec Lansing, LLC (f/k/a Audio Technologies Acquisition, LLC), and Audio Technologies Acquisition B.V. 10-Q 001-12696 2.1.2 1/27/2010  
             
2.1.3 Side Letter, dated February 15, 2010, to the Asset Purchase Agreement, dated October 2, 2009, by and among Plantronics, Inc., Plantronics, B.V., and Audio Technologies Acquisition, LLC., as amended by that certain First Amendment to Asset Purchase Agreement, dated November 30, 2009, by and among Plantronics, Inc., Plantronics, B.V., Altec Lansing, LLC (f/k/a Audio Technologies Acquisition, LLC), and Audio Technologies Acquisition B.V. 10-K 001-12696 2.1.3 6/1/2010  
             
3.1.1 Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Registrant 8-K 001-12696 3.1 6/20/2011  
             
3.2.1 2009 Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware on January 20, 2009 8-K 001-12696 3(i) 1/20/2009  
             
3.3 Registrant’s Certificate of Designation of Rights, Preferences and Privileges of Series A Participating Preferred Stock filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on April 1, 2002 8-A 001-12696 3.6 3/29/2002  
             
4.1 Preferred Stock Rights Agreement, dated as of March 13, 2002 between the Registrant and Equiserve Trust Company, N.A., including the Certificate of Designation, the form of Rights Certificate and the Summary of Rights attached thereto as Exhibits A, B, and C, respectively 8-A 001-12696 4.1 3/29/2002  
             
10.1* Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and certain directors and executives 10-K 001-12696 10.2 5/31/2005  
             
10.2.1* Executive Incentive Plan, dated May 8, 2009, as Amended September 10, 2010 8-K 001-12696 10.1 9/16/2010  
             
          X
             
10.3.1 Lease Agreement dated May 2004 between Finsa Portafolios, S.A. DE C.V.and Plamex, S.A. de C.V., a subsidiary of the Registrant, for premises located in Tijuana, Mexico (translation from Spanish original) 10-Q 001-12696 10.5.1 8/6/2004  
             
10.3.2 Lease Agreement dated May 2004 between Finsa Portafolios, S.A. DE C.V.and Plamex, S.A. de C.V., a subsidiary of the Registrant, for premises located in Tijuana, Mexico (translation from Spanish original) 10-Q 001-12696 10.5.2 8/6/2004  
             
    Incorporation by Reference  
Exhibit Number Exhibit Description Form File No. Exhibit Filing Date Filed Herewith
3.1.1 Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Registrant 8-K 001-12696 3.1 6/20/2011  
             
3.2.1 2009 Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware on January 20, 2009 8-K 001-12696 3(i) 1/20/2009  
             
10.1* Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and certain directors and executives 10-K 001-12696 10.2 5/31/2005  
             
10.2.1* Executive Incentive Plan, dated May 8, 2009, as Amended September 10, 2010 8-K 001-12696 10.1 9/16/2010  
             
10.2.2 Plantronics, Inc. Executive Incentive Plan 10-K 001-12696 10.2.2 5/25/2012  
             
10.3.1 Lease Agreement dated May 2004 between Finsa Portafolios, S.A. DE C.V.and Plamex, S.A. de C.V., a subsidiary of the Registrant, for premises located in Tijuana, Mexico (translation from Spanish original) 10-Q 001-12696 10.5.1 8/6/2004  
             
10.3.2 Lease Agreement dated May 2004 between Finsa Portafolios, S.A. DE C.V.and Plamex, S.A. de C.V., a subsidiary of the Registrant, for premises located in Tijuana, Mexico (translation from Spanish original) 10-Q 001-12696 10.5.2 8/6/2004  
             
10.4 Purchase and Sale Agreement between Plamex, S.A. de C.V., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Registrant, and CP Monterrey, S.A. de C.V. dated June 2012 10-Q 001-12696 10.32 10/20/1993  
             
10.5* Plantronics, Inc. 2003 Stock Plan, as amended and restated effective as of August 10, 2012, as approved by Registrant's Board of Directors on June 11, 2012 8-K 001-12696 10.1 8/13/2012  
             
10.6* 1993 Stock Option Plan 10-K 001-12696 10.8 6/21/2002  
             
10.7.1* 1993 Director Stock Option Plan S-1   10.29 10/20/1993  
             
10.7.2* Amendment to the 1993 Director Stock Option Plan S-8 333-14833 4.4 10/25/1996  
             
10.7.3* Amendment No. 2 to the 1993 Director Stock Option Plan 10-K 001-12696 10.9(a) 6/1/2001  

            
10.7.4 * Amendment No. 3 to the 1993 Director Stock Option Plan 10-K 001-12696 10.9(b) 6/1/2001  
             
10.7.5* Amendment No. 4 to the 1993 Director Stock Option Plan 10-K 001-12696 10.9.5 6/21/2002  
             
10.8* Plantronics, Inc. 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, amended and restated effective as of August 10, 2012, as approved by the Plantronics Board of Directors on June 11, 2012 8-K 001-12696 10.2 8/13/2012  
             
10.9 Trust Agreement Establishing the Plantronics, Inc. Annual Profit Sharing/Individual Savings Plan Trust S-8 333-19351 4.3 1/7/1997  
             
10.10.1* Plantronics, Inc. Basic Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended August 8, 1996 S-8 333-19351 4.5 3/25/1997  
             
10.10.2 Trust Agreement Under the Plantronics, Inc. Basic Deferred Stock Compensation Plan S-8 333-19351 4.6 3/25/1997  
             
10.10.3 Plantronics, Inc. Basic Deferred Compensation Plan Participant Election S-8 333-19351 4.7 3/25/1997  
             
10.11* Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated on November 17, 2009 between Registrant and Ken Kannappan 10-K 001-12696 10.11.1 6/1/2010  
             
10.12* Employment Agreement dated as of November 1996 between Registrant and Don Houston 10-K 001-12696 10.14.2 6/2/2003  
             
10.13* Employment Agreement dated as of June 2003 between Registrant and Philip Vanhoutte 10-K 001-12696 10.12.4 5/31/2005  
             
10.14 Employment Agreement dated as of April 1, 2011 between Registrant and Joe Burton 10-K 001-12696 10.15 5/25/2012  
             

8583


    Incorporation by Reference  
Exhibit Number Exhibit Description Form File No. Exhibit Filing Date Filed Herewith
10.4 Lease dated December 7, 1990 between Canyge Bicknell Limited and Plantronics Limited, a subsidiary of the Registrant, for premises located in Wootton Bassett, The United Kingdom S-1   10.32 10/20/1993  
             
10.5* Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Plan 10-K 001-12696 10.2 11/3/2011  
             
10.6* 1993 Stock Option Plan 10-K 001-12696 10.8 6/21/2002  
             
10.7.1* 1993 Director Stock Option Plan S-1   10.29 10/20/1993  
             
10.7.2* Amendment to the 1993 Director Stock Option Plan S-8 333-14833 4.4 10/25/1996  
             
10.7.3* Amendment No. 2 to the 1993 Director Stock Option Plan 10-K 001-12696 10.9(a) 6/1/2001  

            
10.7.4 * Amendment No. 3 to the 1993 Director Stock Option Plan 10-K 001-12696 10.9(b) 6/1/2001  
             
10.7.5* Amendment No. 4 to the 1993 Director Stock Option Plan 10-K 001-12696 10.9.5 6/21/2002  
             
10.8* Plantronics, Inc. 2002 Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan, effective as of July 29, 2009, as approved by the Plantronics Board of Directors on January 14, 2010 10-K 001-12696 10.9.1 6/1/2010  
             
10.9 Trust Agreement Establishing the Plantronics, Inc. Annual Profit Sharing/Individual Savings Plan Trust S-8 333-19351 4.3 1/7/1997  
             
10.10.1* Plantronics, Inc. Basic Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended August 8, 1996 S-8 333-19351 4.5 3/25/1997  
             
10.10.2 Trust Agreement Under the Plantronics, Inc. Basic Deferred Stock Compensation Plan S-8 333-19351 4.6 3/25/1997  
             
10.10.3 Plantronics, Inc. Basic Deferred Compensation Plan Participant Election S-8 333-19351 4.7 3/25/1997  
             
10.11* Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated on November 17, 2009 between Registrant and Ken Kannappan 10-K 001-12696 10.11.1 6/1/2010  
             
10.12* Employment Agreement dated as of November 1996 between Registrant and Don Houston 10-K 001-12696 10.14.2 6/2/2003  
             
10.13.1* Employment Agreement dated as of March 1997 between Registrant and Barbara Scherer 10-K 001-12696 10.14.4 6/2/2003  
             
10.13.2* Transition Agreement dated February 27, 2012 between Registrant and Barbara Scherer 8-K 001-12696 10.1 3/1/2012  
             
10.14* Employment Agreement dated as of June 2003 between Registrant and Philip Vanhoutte 10-K 001-12696 10.12.4 5/31/2005  
             
          X
             
10.16* Form of Change of Control Severance Agreement dated on or about January 26, 2009 between Registrant, Barbara Scherer, Don Houston, Rich Pickard and Renee Niemi and effective September 15, 2011 between Registrant and Joe Burton 8-K 001-12696 10.1 1/30/2009  
             
10.17 Standby Letter of Credit Agreement dated as of March 31, 2009 between Registrant, Plantronics BV and Wells Fargo Bank N.A. 10-K 001-12696 10.13.6 5/26/2009  
             
10.18.1** Credit Agreement dated May 9, 2011, between Registrant and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association 8-K 001-12696 10.1 5/9/2011  
    Incorporation by Reference  
Exhibit Number Exhibit Description Form File No. Exhibit Filing Date Filed Herewith
10.15 Employment Agreement dated as of June 1, 2012 between Registrant and Pamela Strayer 8-K/A 001-12696 10.1 8/8/2012  
             
10.16* Form of Change of Control Severance Agreement dated on or about January 26, 2009 between Registrant, Don Houston, Rich Pickard and Renee Niemi and effective September 15, 2011 between Registrant and Joe Burton and effective on July 16, 2012 between Registrant and Pamela Strayer 8-K 001-12696 10.1 1/30/2009  
             
10.17 Standby Letter of Credit Agreement dated as of March 31, 2009 between Registrant, Plantronics BV and Wells Fargo Bank N.A. 10-K 001-12696 10.13.6 5/26/2009  
             
10.18.1** Credit Agreement dated May 9, 2011, between Registrant and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association 8-K 001-12696 10.1 5/9/2011  
             
10.18.1.1 First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated June 11, 2012, between Registrant and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association 10-Q 001-12696 10.2 8/8/2012  
             
10.18.1.2 Second Modification to Revolving Line of Credit Note dated December 2, 2012 between Registrant and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association 10-Q 001-12696 10.1 1/31/2013  
             
10.18.1.3 Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated August 2, 2012, between Registrant and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association 8-K 001-12696 10.1 8/6/2012  
             
10.18.1.4 Third Amendment to Credit Agreement dated May 3, 2013, between Registrant and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association 8-K 001-12696 10.1 5/7/2013  
             
10.18.1.5 Third Modification to Revolving Line of Credit Note dated May 3, 2013, between Registrant and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association 8-K 001-12696 10.2 5/7/2013  
             
10.18.2** 
Accelerated Stock Buyback Master and Supplemental Confirmations dated May 9, 2011 by and between the Company and Goldman, Sachs & Co.

 10-Q 001-12696 10.1 8/4/2011  
             
10.18.3** Collared Accelerated Stock Buyback Master and Supplemental Confirmations dated May 9, 2011 by and between Registrant and Goldman, Sachs & Co. 10-Q 001-12696 10.2 8/4/2011  
             
10.18.4** 
Accelerated Stock Buyback Supplemental Confirmation dated August 19, 2011 by and between the Company and Goldman, Sachs & Co.

 10-Q 001-12696 10.1 11/3/2011  
             
10.19** Third Amended and Restated Development and Manufacturing Agreement, dated October 15, 2011, between Plantronics, B.V., and GoerTek, Inc. 10-Q 001-12696 10.1 2/2/2012  
             
10.20 Employment Agreement dated as of March 1997 between Registrant and Barbara Scherer 10-K 001-12696 10.14.4 6/2/2003  
             
10.20.1 Transition Agreement dated February 27, 2012 between Registrant and Barbara Scherer 8-K 001-12696 10.1 3/1/2012  
             
10.20.1.1 Amendment Number 01 to Transition Agreement dated August 2, 2012 between Registrant and Barbara Scherer 10-Q 001-12696 10.5 11/1/2012  
             
          X
             
          X
             
24 Power of Attorney – Power of Attorney (incorporated by reference to the signature page of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.)          
             
          X
             
          X
             

86


    Incorporation by Reference  
Exhibit Number Exhibit Description Form File No. Exhibit Filing Date Filed Herewith
             
10.18.2** 
Accelerated Stock Buyback Master and Supplemental Confirmations dated May 9, 2011 by and between the Company and Goldman, Sachs & Co.

 10-Q 001-12696 10.1 8/4/2011  
10.18.3** Collared Accelerated Stock Buyback Master and Supplemental Confirmations dated May 9, 2011 by and between Registrant and Goldman, Sachs & Co. 10-Q 001-12696 10.2 8/4/2011  
10.18.4** 
Accelerated Stock Buyback Supplemental Confirmation dated August 19, 2011 by and between the Company and Goldman, Sachs & Co.

 10-Q 001-12696 10.1 11/3/2011  
             
10.19** Third Amended and Restated Development and Manufacturing Agreement, dated October 15, 2011, between Plantronics, B.V., and GoerTek, Inc. 10-Q 001-12696 10.1 2/2/2012  
             
10.20 Contract for the Transfer of Factory Building and the Land-Use Right, Dated July 23, 2010 10-Q 001-12696 10.1 11/4/2010  
             
          X
             
          X
             
24 Power of Attorney – Power of Attorney (incorporated by reference to the signature page of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.)          
             
          X
             
          X
             
          X
             
101 INS*** XBRL Instance Document         X
             
101 SCH*** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document         X
             
101 CAL*** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document         X
             
101 LAB*** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document         X
             
101 PRE*** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document         X
             
101 DEF*** XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document         X
             
* Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement in which any Director or any Executive Officer participates.          
** Confidential treatment has been granted with respect to certain portions of this Exhibit.          

8784


    Incorporation by Reference  
Exhibit Number Exhibit Description Form File No. Exhibit Filing Date Filed Herewith
X
101 INS***XBRL Instance DocumentX
101 SCH***XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema DocumentX
101 CAL***XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase DocumentX
101 LAB***XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase DocumentX
101 PRE***XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase DocumentX
101 DEF***XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase DocumentX
*Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement in which any Director or any Executive Officer participates.
**Confidential treatment has been granted with respect to certain portions of this Exhibit.
*** In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the information in these exhibits is furnished and deemed not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposed of Section 18 of the Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections and shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.          


8885