UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K10-K/A

Amendment No. 1

(Mark One)
  X     Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2016
or
         Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from             to             
Commission file number001-32978
SOLITARIO EXPLORATION & ROYALTY CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

 Colorado
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
84-1285791
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 4251 Kipling St. Suite 390, Wheat Ridge, CO
(Address of principal executive offices)
80033
(Zip Code)
 Registrant's telephone number, including area code(303)  534-1030

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:  

Title of each className of exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.01 par valueNYSE MKT

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

YES [  ]   NO [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

YES [  ]   NO [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YES [X]   NO [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

YES [X]   NO [  ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained to the best of registrant's knowledge in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  [ ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.:

 

 Large accelerated filer [ ]Accelerated filer [  ]   Non-accelerated Filer [  ]
(Do not check if a smaller
    reporting company)
Smaller Reporting Company [X]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

YES [ ] NO [X]

 

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter, based upon the closing sale price of the registrant's common stock on June 30, 2016 as reported on NYSE MKT, was approximately $18,598,000.

 

There were 38,686,989 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding on March 10, 2017.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement for the Registrant’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which is expected to be filed by April 28, 2017, have been incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K

 1 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTSDOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

Page
PART 1
Item 1   Business3
Item 1A Risk Factors5
Item 1B Unresolved Staff Comments10
Item 2    Properties11
Item 3    Legal Proceedings16
Item 4    Mine Safety Disclosures16
PART II
Item 5    Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
                   Purchases of Equity Securities17
Item 6    Selected Financial Data19
Item 7    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
                  Results of Operations20
Item 7A  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk27
Item 8    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data28
Item 9    Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
                   Financial Disclosure47
Item 9A  Controls and Procedures47
Item 9B  Other Information47
PART III
Item 10    Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance48
Item 11    Executive Compensation48
Item 12    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
                    Stockholder Matters
48
Item 13    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence48
Item 14    Principal Accounting Fees and Services48
PART IV
Item 15    Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules49
SIGNATURES50

None

 

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (this “Amendment”) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Solitario Exploration & Royalty Corp. (“Solitario” or "the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, initially filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on March 13, 2017 (the “Original Filing”), is being filed to include the information required in Part III of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Part III information was previously omitted from the Original Filing in reliance on General Instruction G (3) to Form 10-K, which permits the information in the above referenced items to be incorporated in the Form 10-K by reference to our definitive proxy statement if such statement is filed no later than 120 days after our fiscal year end. The reference on the cover of the Original Filing to the incorporation by reference to portions of our definitive proxy statement into Part III of the Original Filing is hereby deleted.

In addition, pursuant to the rules of the SEC, the exhibit list included in Item 15 of Part IV of the Original Filing has been amended to contain currently-dated certifications from the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The certifications of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are attached as exhibits to this Amendment.

Except for the foregoing amended information, this Amendment does not amend or update any other information contained in the Original Filing. Therefore, this Amendment should be read together with other documents that the Company has filed with the SEC subsequent to the filing of the Original Filing. Information in such reports and documents updates and supersedes certain information contained in the Original Filing.

 2 

 

Item 10.PART IDirectors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

 

ThisDirectors and Officers

(a)Identification of Directors

NameAge
Brian Labadie
Chairman
(1)(2)(3)(4)
64Mr. Labadie has been a director of Solitario since June 2006 and Chairman since March of 2009.  He is an independent mining industry consultant.  He was a director of Crown Resources Corporation (CRS: TSX) ("Crown") from June of 2002 until August 2006 upon completion of Crown’s merger with Kinross Gold Corporation ("Crown-Kinross Merger") and a director of Battle Mountain Gold Exploration Corporation (BMGX:OTC) from June 2005 to June 2007.  In evaluating Mr. Labadie’s qualifications as a director, Solitario’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) considered the experience Mr. Labadie has in over forty years-experience in the mining industry.  The specific experience that Mr. Labadie brings to Solitario includes formal training and experience as a mining engineer including developing and operating mines, both as a mine manager and as a senior executive at Miramar Mining Corporation and Echo Bay Mines.  The Board believes Mr. Labadie’s operating experience complements and enhances the knowledge and understanding the other Board members and management of Solitario have in mining exploration, and corporate finance.  Mr. Labadie spent ten years with Miramar Mining Corporation from November 1996 to September 2006 as the Executive Vice President, COO.  Prior to that, Mr. Labadie spent nine years with Echo Bay Mines, Ltd. as Vice President of Operations.  Mr. Labadie holds a Bachelor of Science degree in geological engineering from the University of Toronto.

John Labate
(1)(2)(3)(4)

67Mr. Labate has been a director of Solitario since December 2016 and is the Audit Committee Chairman.  Since May 2015 he has been the CFO of Gold Resources Corporation.  Mr. Labate has held management positions in the mining industry for the past 36 years.  These included Operations Analysis Manager for Anaconda Minerals Company (1980-1986), Corporate Controller for Bond International Gold (1987-1991), CFO for Crown (1992-1997), CFO for GeoBiotics (1997-1999); CFO for Applied Optical Technologies (1999-2004), CFO for Constellation Copper (2004-2008,  CFO for Golden Star Resources (2008-2012) and principal of East Cape Advisors (2012-2015).  Mr. Labate is experienced in all aspects of accounting, finance and regulatory management within the public sector of the mining industry in both the United States and Canada.  The Board believes Mr. Labate’s formal training in accounting and finance, coupled with his 36 years of industry experience, makes him uniquely suited to serve on the Board.  Mr. Labate received a Bachelor of Science, Accounting, from San Diego State University and passed all parts of the CPA examination. 

3

Leonard Harris
(1)(2)(3)(4)
89Mr. Harris has been a director of Solitario since June 1998.  Prior to his retirement from Newmont Mining Corporation, Mr. Harris gained over 60 years of experience in the mining industry serving in various capacities including as the former General Manager of Minera Yanacocha, South America's largest gold mine, and former Vice President and General Manager of Newmont Latin America. Mr. Harris has over 20 years of experience in managing mining operations in Latin America that include base metal and gold deposits, underground and open pit mines, gold and base metal processing plants and smelting and refining operations.  In evaluating Mr. Harris’s qualifications to serve as a director, the Board believes Mr. Harris experience in managing and developing mines all over the world, but specifically in Peru and Latin America, where much of Solitario’s exploration efforts have been focused, is paramount to the success of Solitario.  In addition, Mr. Harris has a strong reputation in the mining industry and has provided Solitario with numerous opportunities and introductions that Solitario would likely not have had without his association with Solitario as a Board member.  Mr. Harris currently serves on the board of directors of Aztec Metals Corp., Canarc Resources, Wealth Minerals, Inc and Cardero Resources Corp.  He is a 1949 graduate metallurgist of The Mount Morgan School of Mines (Australia).
Christopher E. Herald

63Mr. Herald has been a director of Solitario since August 1992.  He has also served as Chief Executive Officer since June 1999 and President since August 1993.  Mr. Herald also served as a director of Crown starting in April 1989, as Chief Executive Officer of Crown starting in June of 1999, President of Crown from November 1990 until August 2006, when he resigned from such positions upon completion of the Crown-Kinross Merger.  In evaluating Mr. Herald’s qualifications to serve as a director, the Board of Solitario believes his leadership of Solitario since Solitario’s inception as Chief Executive Officer, as well as his knowledge of the operations, make him an invaluable member of the Board.  In addition, Mr. Herald has shown a keen insight in the evaluation of various opportunities in the mining industry, including the acquisition of properties for exploration and potential merger and acquisition candidates for Solitario.  Mr. Herald has a track record of operating mining companies both with Crown and Solitario and the Board believes these are significant contributors to the success of Solitario.  Prior to joining Crown, Mr. Herald was a Senior Geologist with Echo Bay Mines and Anaconda Minerals Mr. Herald was formerly a director of  Underworld Resources Inc. (UW: V) from June 2009 to June 2011, and Atna Resources from May 2009 to June 2015.  Mr. Herald is past Chairman of the Denver Gold Group, a non-profit industry trade group that organizes the preeminent gold mining industry institutional conferences in the United States and Europe.   Mr. Herald received a M.S. in Geology from the Colorado School of Mines and a B.S. in Geology from the University of Notre Dame.
  1. The Board has determined this director to be an independent member of the Board in accordance with Section 803A of the NYSE-MKT Company Guide.
  2. Member of the Audit Committee.
  3. Member of the Compensation Committee.
  4. Member of the Nominating Committee.

(b)Identification of Executive Officers

Executive Officers

The following biographies describe the business experience of our executive officers (each also being a "Named Executive Officer" as defined in Item 402 of Regulation S-K):

Christopher E. HeraldSee biography above under the heading “Identification of Directors.”

Walter H. Hunt (66) has been Chief Operating Officer of Solitario since June 2008 and Vice President - Operations and President - South American Operations of Solitario since June 1999. He also served as Vice President - Peru Operations from July 1994 until June 1999. Mr. Hunt was also Vice President - Operations of Crown from 1994 until completion of the Crown - Kinross Merger in August of 2006. Mr. Hunt has over 35 years of exploration, development and operational experience with Anaconda Minerals, Noranda and Echo Bay Mines where he served as Superintendent, Technical Services and Chief Geologist at Echo Bay's Kettle River Operations. Mr. Hunt received his M.S. degree in Geology from the Colorado School of Mines and a B.S. degree from Furman University.

James R. Maronick (61) has served as Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of Solitario since 1999 and was Chief Financial Officer of Crown from June 1999 until completion of the Crown - Kinross Merger in August of 2006. Prior to that, Mr. Maronick served as Vice President - Finance and Secretary/Treasurer of Consolidated Nevada Gold Fields Corporation from November 1994 to September 1997. Mr. Maronick graduated with honors from the University of Notre Dame in 1977 with a BA in accounting and received his Master’s degree in Finance with highest honors from the University of Denver in 1986.

4

(c) Identification of Certain Significant Employees

Not Applicable.

(d) Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among any director or executive offices of the Company

(e) Business Experience

The business experience of each of our directors and executive officers is set forth in Item 10(a)—Identification of Directors of this Annual Report on Form 10-K contains statements that constitute "forward-looking statements" within10-K/A and the meaningbusiness experience of section 27Athose executive officers who are not also our directors is set forth in Item 10(b)—Identification of the Securities ActExecutive Officers of 1933 and section 21Ethis Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.

The directorships held by each of our directors in any company with a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical information and include the words "expects", "believes", "anticipates", "plans", "may", "will", "intend", "estimate", "continue" or other similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those currently anticipated. These risks and uncertainties include, butSection 15(d) of the Exchange Act or any company registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, are not limited to, items discussed belowset forth in Item 1A "Risk Factors"10(a)—Identification of Directors of this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.

(f) Involvement in this Form 10-K. Forward-looking statements speak only asCertain Legal Proceedings

During the past ten years none of the date made. We undertake no obligationpersons serving as executive officers and/or directors of the Company has been the subject matter of any of the following legal proceedings that are required to publicly releasebe disclosed pursuant to Item 401(f) of Regulation S-K including: (a) any bankruptcy petition filed by or update forward-looking statements, whether asagainst any business of which such person was a resultgeneral partner or executive officer either at the time of new information, future eventsthe bankruptcy or otherwise. You are, however, advised to consult any further disclosures we make on related subjects in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and any reports made on Form 8-K to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC").

Item 1.Business

The Company

Solitario Exploration & Royalty Corp. (“Solitario,” “Company,” “we,” or “us”) is an exploration stage company at December 31, 2016 under Industry Guide 7, as issued by the SEC. Solitario was incorporated in the state of Colorado on November 15, 1984 as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Crown Resources Corporation ("Crown"). In July 1994, Solitario became a publicly traded company on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the “TSX”) through its initial public offering. We have been actively involved in mineral exploration since 1993. Our primary business is to acquire exploration mineral properties or royalties on mineral properties, and/or to discover economic deposits on our mineral properties and advance these deposits, either on our own or through joint ventures, up to the development stage (development activities include, among other things, completion of a feasibility study for the identification of proven and probable reserves, as well as permitting and preparing a deposit for mining). At that point, or sometimewithin two years prior to that point, we would likely attempttime; (b) any criminal convictions; (c) any order, judgment, or decree permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; (d) any finding by a court, the SEC or the U.S. Commodity Future Trading Commission to sellhave violated a given mineral property, pursue its development either on our own,federal or through a joint venture with a partner that has expertise in mining operations,state securities or obtain a royalty from a third party that continues to advance the property. In addition to focusing on our current assets and the evaluationcommodities law, any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies, or any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud; or (e) any sanction or order of mineral properties for acquisitionany self-regulatory organization or purchase of royalty interests, we also evaluate potential strategic corporate transactions for the potential acquisition of new precious and base metal properties and assets with exploration potentialregistered entity or business combinations we determineequivalent exchange, association or entity. Further, no such legal proceedings are believed to be favorable to Solitario.contemplated by governmental authorities against any director or executive officer.

 

Sale of Mt. Hamilton LLC(g) Promoters and Control Persons

 

On August 25, 2015, we, along with DHI Minerals (US) Ltd. (“DHI”), sold our combined interests in the Mt. Hamilton gold project to Waterton Nevada Splitter, LLC, (“Waterton”) for total cash proceeds of US$30 million (the “Transaction”) pursuant to a definitive agreement entered into on June 10, 2015 (the “Agreement”). We sold our 80% interest in Mt. Hamilton LLC (“MH-LLC”), a limited liability company which held 100% of the Mt. Hamilton project assets, and DHI sold its 20% interest in MH-LLC. DHI is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ely Gold and Minerals, Inc. (“Ely”). We received gross cash proceeds of US$24 million and Ely received gross cash proceeds of US$6 million. Our costs and fees related to the Transaction, including broker fees and professional service fees, were $439,000. The Transaction was structured as the sale of DHI’s and our combined membership interests in MH-LLC. We recorded a gain on sale related to the Transaction of $12,309,000. Concurrent with the closing of the Transaction, we paid $5,000,000 plus $7,000 of interest and fees to fully repay the funds we had borrowed (the “RMB Loan”) pursuant to a facility agreement (the “Facility Agreement”) with RMB Australia Holdings Limited (“RMBAH”) and RMB Resources, Inc. (“RMBR”).Not Applicable.

 

Corporate structure(h) Meetings of Board of Directors Annual Meeting Attendance

 

Solitario Exploration & Royalty Corp. [Colorado]

- Minera Chambara, S.A. [Peru] (85%)

- Minera Solitario Peru, S.A. [Peru]

- Minera Bongará, S.A. [Peru] (39%)

- Minera Soloco, S.A. [Peru]

Our Bongará and Chambara projects are joint ventured to Compania Minera Milpo S.A.A. (“Milpo”). Milpo is traded onDuring the Lima exchange under the symbol “MILPOCI”. In January 2015, Solitario began accounting for its interest in both Bongará and Minera Chambara under the equity method of accounting. During thefiscal year ended December 31, 2016, we sold our previously owned subsidiary, Solitario Mexico, SA,there were four meetings of the Board. Each of the incumbent directors attended each of those Board meetings. Each of the incumbent directors attended all meetings held by committees of the Board (described below) on which had held interest in exploration properties in Mexico.

3

they served during 2016. All of the references to meetings exclude actions taken by written consent.

At December 31, 2016, we had three mineral exploration properties in Peru and our Yanacocha royalty property in Peru,The Company does not have a retained royalty onformal policy regarding the Pedra Branca project in Brazil, a retained royalty on the Norcan and Aconchi non-producing exploration properties in Mexico, and during 2016 we acquired a royalty on certain non-producing mineral claims in Montana. We are conducting exploration activities and limited property evaluation activities in those countries either on our own using contract geologists, or through joint ventures operated by our partners.

Our exploration activities and thoseattendance of our joint venture partners are carried out on a property-by-property basis. When these activities, including drilling, samplingBoard members at our annual meetings of shareholders and geologic testing, indicate a project may not be economic or contain sufficient geologic or economic potential, we may impair or completely write-off the property. Another significant factor in the success or failure of our activities is the price of commodities. For example, when the price of gold is down, the value of any of our gold-bearing mineral exploration properties decreases; however, it may also become easier and less expensive to locate and acquire new gold-bearing mineral exploration properties with potential to have economic deposits.

Our current and near-term future exploration activities in Peru consist of reconnaissance exploration for the identification of new properties for acquisition, as well as evaluation of strategic corporate opportunities and ongoing exploration activities on our existing exploration projects through the use of contract geologists, and oversight of our joint ventures in Peru that are managed by our partners.

Solitario has recorded revenue in the past from the sale of mineral properties, joint venture property payments and the sale of a royalty on its formerly-held Mt. Hamilton property. Proceeds from the sale or joint venture of properties, although potentially significant when they occur, have not been a consistent source of cash and may only occur in the future, if at all, on an infrequent basis. Accordingly, while we conduct exploration activities on our projects, we need to maintain and replenish our capital resources. We have met our need for capital in the past through (i) proceeds of the Transaction; (ii) sale of our shares of common stock of Kinross Gold Corporation (“Kinross”); (iii) borrowing in the form of short-term margin debt secured by our investment in Kinross; (iv) borrowing under the Facility Agreement (v) joint venture delay rental payments, including payments on our Bongará project; (vi) a royalty sale for $10,000,000 in 2012; (vii) issuance of common stock; (viii) sale of covered call options on our Kinross common stock; and (ix) interest on short term Treasury Notes and Bank CDs. In the past, we have reduced our exposure to the costs of our exploration activities through the use of joint ventures.

We operate in one segment, mineral exploration. We currently conduct exploration activities in Peru and exploration evaluation activities throughout North and South America, including Canada, Peru, Mexico and the United States. As of March, 10, 2017, we had five full-time employees, located in the United States and no full-time employees outside of the United States. We utilize contract managers, geologists and laborers to execute our Latin American project work and acquisition evaluations.

A large number of companies are engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties, many of which have substantially greater technical and financial resources than we have and, accordingly, we may be at a disadvantage in being able to compete effectively for the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties. WeBoard members are not aware of any single competitor or group of competitors that dominate the exploration and development of mineral properties. In acquiring mineral properties for exploration and development, we rely on the experience, technical expertise and knowledge of our employees and advisors, which is limited by the size of our company compared to many of our competitors who may have either more employees or employees with more specialized knowledge and experience.

Governmental Regulations

Mineral development and exploration activities are subject to various national, state/provincial, and local laws and regulations, which govern prospecting, development, mining, production, exports, taxes, labor standards, occupational health, waste disposal, protection of the environment, mine safety, hazardous substances and other matters.  Similarly, if any of our properties are developed and/or mined those activities are also subject to significant governmental regulation and oversight. We are required to obtainattend such meetings. Mr. Herald was the licenses, permits and other authorizations in order to conduct our exploration programs.only director that attended the annual meeting of shareholders held on June 14, 2016.

Environmental Regulations

Our current and planned activities are subject to various national and local laws and regulations governing protection of the environment. These laws are continually changing and, in general, are becoming more restrictive. We are required to conduct our operations in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Changes to current local, state or federal laws and regulations in each jurisdiction in which we conduct our exploration activities could, in the future, require additional capital expenditures and increased operating and/or reclamation costs. Although we are unable to predict what additional legislation, if any, might be proposed or enacted, additional regulatory requirements could impact the economics of our projects. During 2016, we had no material environmental incidents or non-compliance with any applicable environmental regulations.

4

Financial Information about Geographic Areas

Included in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2016 and 2015 are total assets of $60,000 and $86,000, respectively, related to Solitario's operations located outside of the United States.

Available Information

We file our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports electronically with the SEC. The public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC's public reference room at 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 or by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an internet website, http://www.sec.gov, which contains reports, proxy information and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.

Paper copies of our Annual Report to Shareholders, our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports are available free of charge by writing to Solitario at its address on the front of this Form 10-K. In addition, electronic versions of the reports we file with the SEC are available on our website, www.solitarioxr.com as soon as practicable, after filing with the SEC.

Item 1A.Risk Factors

In addition to considering the other information in this Form 10-K, you should consider carefully the following factors. The risks described below are the significant risks we face and include all material risks. Additional risks not presently known to us or risks that we currently consider immaterial may also adversely affect our business.

Our mineral exploration activities involve a high degree of risk, and a significant portion of our business model envisions the sale or joint venture of mineral property. If we are unable to sell or joint venture these properties, the money spent on exploration may never be recovered and we could incur an impairment of our investments in our projects.

The exploration for mineral deposits involves significant financial and other risks over an extended period of time. Few properties that are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. Major expenditures are required to determine if any of our mineral properties may have the potential to be commercially viable and be salable or joint ventured. Prior to completion of the feasibility study on our Mt. Hamilton project, we had never established reserves on any of our properties. Significant additional expense and risks, including drilling and determining the feasibility of a project, are required prior to the establishment of reserves. It is impossible to ensure that the current or proposed exploration programs on properties in which we have an interest will be commercially viable or that we will be able to sell, joint venture or develop our properties. Whether a mineral deposit will becommercially viable depends on a number of factors, some of which are the particular attributes of the deposit, such as its size and grade, costs and efficiency of the recovery methods that can be employed, proximity to infrastructure, financing costs and governmental regulations, including regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, infrastructure, land use, importing and exporting of gold or other minerals, and environmental protection.

We believe the data obtained from our own exploration activities or our partners' activities to be reliable; however, the nature of exploration of mineral properties and analysis of geological information is often subjective and data and conclusions are subject to uncertainty. Even if exploration activities determine that a project is commercially viable, it is impossible to ensure that such determination will result in a profitable sale of the project or development either on our own or by a joint venture in the future and that such project will result in profitable commercial mining operations. If we determine that capitalized costs associated with any of our mineral interests are not likely to be recovered, we would incur an impairment of our investment in such property interest. All of these factors may result in losses in relation to amounts spent, which are not recoverable. We have experienced losses of this type from time to time including during 2016 when we wrote down our investments in our exploration projects in Mexico and abandoned our Canta Colorado project in Peru, recording mineral property impairments totaling $13,000.

A significant portion of our liquid assets consist of U.S. Treasuries and bank certificates of deposit. The failure of the financial institutions that issued or hold these financial instruments could have a material adverse impact on the market price of our common stock and our liquidity and capital resources.

 5 

 

(i) Procedures for Stockholder Nominations to the Registrant’s Board of Directors

At

No material changes to the procedures for nominating directors by our shareholders, as described in the Proxy Statement filed by the Company on April 28, 2016 with respect to the 2016 annual meeting of shareholders, has been made since such Proxy Statement was filed.

(j) Audit Committee and Financial Expert

Solitario has a separately-designated standing audit committee established in accordance with section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee consists of Mr. Labate, Mr. Harris and Mr. Labadie, each of whom is “independent” in accordance with NYSE MKT standards, as well as the independence requirements for audit committee members under Rule 10A-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act. The Board has determined that Mr. Labate is the audit committee financial expert as defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K. The Audit Committee acts under a written charter that was adopted and approved by the Board on July 26, 2006, a current copy of which is available on the Company website at www.solitarioxr.com. The Audit Committee’s primary function is to review Solitario's financial reporting process on behalf of the Board. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting processes, including the system of internal controls. The Audit Committee met five times during the year ended December 31, 2016.

Audit Committee Report

In performing its duties the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements contained in the 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K with management and Solitario's independent registered public accountant, EKS&H LLLP. The Audit Committee met with EKS&H LLLP, and discussed all issues deemed to be significant by EKS&H LLLP, including any matters required by Rule 2-07 of Regulation S-X, "Communication with Audit Committees" and by the statements on Auditing Standard No. 16, as amended (AICPAProfessional Standards, Vol. 1, AU section 380), as adopted by the Public Company Oversight Board, and without management present, discussed and reviewed the results of the independent auditor's examination of the financial statements. In addition, in accordance with Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, "Independence Discussions with Audit Committees" as amended or supplemented, the Audit Committee discussed with EKS&H LLLP its independence from Solitario and its management, and has received and reviewed the written disclosures and letter from EKS&H LLLP required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding EKS&H LLLP’s communications with the Audit Committee including that EKS&H LLLP is independent and has discussed EKS&H LLLP’s independence with them.

Based on the reviews and discussions outlined above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that Solitario include the audited financial statements in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 we have invested approximately $7,499,000 in separate, FDIC insured certificates of depositwhich was filed with the maximum individual bank exposureSEC on March 13, 2017.

AUDIT COMMITTEE
                John Labate, Chairman
                Leonard Harris
                Brian Labadie

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of $250,000. Further, asthe Exchange Act requires Solitario's directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of Solitario's equity securities, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of the Company’s Common Stock and other equity securities of Solitario. Officers, directors, greater than ten percent shareholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish Solitario with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Based solely on review of the copies of such reports, furnished to Solitario and written representations that no other reports were required, during the year ended December 31, 2016, we have invested $7,751,000 in United States Treasury securities, with maturities of between 30 daysMr. Labadie, Mr. Jones (a former Director), Mr. Hainey (a former Director), Mr. Harris, Mr. Herald, Mr. Maronick and 18 monthsMr. Hunt, each filed a single Form 4 reporting one transaction late. No other person failed to timely meet the Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to officers, directors, and we have approximately $94,000 of our cash in uninsured deposit accounts including $57,000 held in a brokerage account at Charles Schwab, none of which are covered by FDIC insurance. The failure of either Charles Schwab orgreater than ten percent beneficial owners during the financial institutions holding these funds and assets could have a material impact on the market price of our common stock and our liquidity and capital resources.year ended December 31, 2016.

We have no reported mineral reserves and none of our current projects are likely to be monetized in the near future and any projects we may acquire are not likely to offer the opportunity for near term revenues or sale proceeds, and if we are unsuccessful in identifying mineral reserves in the future, we may not be able to realize any profit from these property interests.

None of our projects have reported mineral reserves. Any mineral reserves on these projects will only come from extensive additional exploration, engineering and evaluation of existing or future mineral properties. The lack of reserves on these mineral properties could prohibit us from any near-term sale or joint venture of our mineral properties and we would not be able to realize any proceeds and or profit from our interests in such mineral properties, which could materially adversely affect our financial position or results of operations.

Our mineral exploration activities are inherently dangerous and could cause us to incur significant unexpected costs, including legal liability for loss of life, damage to property and environmental damage, any of which could materially adversely affect our financial position or results of operations.

Our operations are subject to the hazards and risks normally related to exploration of a mineral deposit, including mapping and sampling, drilling, road building, trenching, assaying and analyzing rock samples, transportation over primitive roads or via small contract aircraft or helicopters and severe weather conditions, any of which could result in damage to life or property, environmental damage and possible legal liability for such damage. Any of these risks could cause us to incur significant unexpected costs that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and ability to finance our exploration and development activities.

We have a history of losses and if we do not operate profitably in the future it could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations and the trading price of our common stock would likely decline.

We have reported losses in 20 of our 23 years of operations. We can provide no assurance that we will be able to operate profitably in the future or begin to generate significant and consistent sources of revenues or cash flows from operations. We have had net income in only three years in our history; during 2015, as a result of the Transaction, during 2003, as a result of a $5,438,000 gain on a derivative instrument related to our investment in certain Crown warrants and during 2000, when we sold our former Yanacocha property. We cannot predict when, if ever, we will be profitable again or able to begin generating consistent revenues or cash flows from our operations or assets. If we do not operate profitably or identify and execute on outside sources of funding, we may be unable to fund our current or contemplated exploration activities, acquire new assets, or otherwise further our business plan.

Our operations outside of the United States of America may be adversely affected by factors outside of our control, such as changing political, local and economic conditions, any of which could materially adversely affect our financial position or results of operations.

Our mineral properties located in Latin America consist primarily of mineral concessions granted by national governmental agencies and are held 100% by us or in conjunction with our joint venture partners, or under lease, option or purchase agreements. Our mineral properties are located in Peru and we hold royalties on non-producing exploration properties in Peru, Mexico, Brazil and Montana (U.S.). We act as operator on all of our mineral properties that are not held in joint ventures or royalty properties. The success of projects held under joint ventures or royalty properties that are not operated by us is substantially dependent on the joint venture partner, over which we have limited or no control.

Our exploration activities, mineral properties and royalties located outside of the United States are subject to the laws of Peru, Mexico and Brazil. Exploration and potential development activities in these countries are potentially subject to political and economic risks, including:

 6 

 

·cancellation or renegotiationCode of contracts;

·disadvantages of competing against companies from countries that are not subject to US laws and regulations, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act;

·changes in foreign laws or regulations;

·changes in tax laws;

·royalty and tax increases or claims by governmental entities, including retroactive claims;

·expropriation or nationalization of property;

· ��     currency fluctuations (particularly related to declines in the US dollar compared to local currencies);

·foreign exchange controls;

·restrictions on the ability for us to hold US dollars or other foreign currencies in offshore bank accounts;

·import and export regulations;

·environmental controls;

·risks of loss due to community opposition to our activities, civil strife, acts of war, guerrilla activities, insurrection and terrorism; and

·other risks arising out of foreign sovereignty over the areas in which our exploration activities
are conducted.Ethics

 

Accordingly,We adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics including a Code of Ethics applicable to the principal executive officer and the principal financial and accounting officer of Solitario (the "Code of Ethics") on June 27, 2006, a copy of which may be found on our current exploration activities outsidewebsite at www.solitarioxr.com and on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Any person who wishes to receive a copy of the United StatesCode of Ethics may be substantially affecteddo so at no charge by factors beyond our control, any of which could materially adversely affect the value of certain of our assets or results of operations. Furthermore, in the event of a dispute arising from such activities, we would likely be subjectwritten request to the exclusive jurisdiction of courts outside of the United States or may not be successful in subjecting persons to the jurisdictions of the courts in the United States, which could adversely affect the outcome of a dispute.Investor Relations, Solitario Exploration & Royalty Corp., 4251 Kipling St, Suite 390, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033.

Item 11.Executive Compensation

We may not have sufficient funding for explorationCompensation Discussion and development, which may impair our profitability and growth.Analysis

 

The capital requiredfollowing discussion provides information regarding the compensation program for Solitario's Named Executive Officers for 2016.

Objectives of the Company’s Compensation Program

The Compensation and Management Development Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) has responsibility for approving the compensation program for Solitario's Named Executive Officers and acts according to a charter that has been approved by the Board and is available on the Company website at www.solitarioxr.com. The compensation program is designed to attract, retain and reward our executives who contribute to Solitario's long-term success. This in turn is intended to build value for Solitario and its shareholders. The program is based upon three fundamental principles:

(1)       A substantial portion of Solitario's Named Executive Officer compensation should be performance and equity-based to achieve alignment with shareholder interests.

This principle is accomplished in two primary ways; first, through the award of stock options or, other equity awards contemplated in the equity compensation plans adopted by Solitario, in an amount and with such terms intended to encourage our Named Executive Officers to promote the long-term growth and performance of Solitario as may be reflected in the price of our Common Stock as quoted on the TSX and the NYSE-MKT.

Second, this is also reflected in terms of cash compensation in the form of cash bonuses. These bonuses are set by the Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, in a range of zero to 100% of base salary. The extent to which bonuses are paid depends entirely on the extent to which the Compensation Committee believes Solitario has met its development, exploration, budget and developmentshareholder goals, as set by the Compensation Committee and the current and expected financial condition of mineral properties is substantial.the Company. In March 2016 the past we have financed operationsCompensation Committee awarded a $60,000 bonus to Mr. Herald, a $44,000 bonus to Mr. Hunt and a $40,000 bonus to Mr. Maronick for the performance of the Named Executive Officers and the achievement of certain Company goals during 2015. The Compensation Committee considered the milestones achieved during 2015 by the Company, including (i) completion of the sale of our former interest in the Mt. Hamilton project through the sale of interestsour interest in mineral properties, includingMt. Hamilton LLC (“MH-LLC”) to Waterton Nevada Splitter, Ltd. (“Waterton”) for gross proceeds of $24,000,000 (the “Transaction”), (ii) the refinancing and eventual repayment, upon the closing of the Transaction, in 2015, the utilization of joint venture arrangements with third parties (generally providing that the third party will obtain a specified percentage$5,000,000 short-term debt due to RMB Australia Holdings, Ltd., and (iii) successful marketing of our interest in a certain property or a subsidiary owning a propertyMH-LLC, including obtaining approval of the Transaction by holders of over 90% of our outstanding shares at our annual meeting held in exchange forAugust 2015. Primarily due to the expenditurelimited financial resources of a specified amount),the Company during 2015, prior to the sale of other assets, sale of marketable equity securities we hold, short-term margin loans, funds fromour interest in MH-LLC, no bonuses were authorized by the Facility Agreement,Compensation Committee to be paid during 2015. The Compensation Committee considered the bonuses paid in 2016 as earned in 2015 and the issuance of common stock. We may need to raise additional capital, or enter into joint venture arrangements, in order to fund the exploration activities required to determine whether mineral deposits on our projectsthese bonuses are commercially viable. New financing or acceptable joint venture partners may or may not be available on a basis that is acceptable to us. The inability to obtain new financing or joint venture partners on acceptable terms may prohibit us from continued development or exploration of our mineral properties. Without the successful sale or future development of our mineral properties through joint ventures, or on our own, we will not be able to realize any profit from our interests in such properties, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.

A large number of companies are engagedincluded in the exploration and development or sale of mineral properties, many of which have substantially greater technical and financial resources than us and, accordingly, we may be unablesummary compensation table below for each Named Executive Officer for the year ended December 31, 2015. The Compensation Committee did not award any bonuses for the year ended December 31, 2016 to compete effectively in this sectorany Named Executive Officer based upon their review of the mining industry which could haveperformance of the price of the Company’s common stock during the year and upon the absence of a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

We are at a disadvantage with respect to many of our competitors in the acquisition, exploration and development or sale of mining projects. Our competitors with greater financial resources than us will be better able to withstand the uncertainties and fluctuations associated with sustained downturns in the market and to acquire high quality exploration and mining properties when market conditions are favorable. In addition, we compete with other companies in the mineral properties sector to attract and retain key executives and other employees with technical skills and experience in the mineral exploration business. There can be no assurance that we will continue to attract and retain skilled and experienced employees or to acquire additional exploration projects. The realization of any of these risks from competitors could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

The title to our mineral properties may be defective or challenged which could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

In connection with the acquisition of our mineral properties, we conduct limited reviews of title and related matters, and obtain certain representations regarding ownership. These limited reviews do not necessarily preclude third parties from challenging our title and, furthermore, our title may be defective. Consequently, there can be no assurance that we hold good and marketable title to all of our mineral interests. Additionally, we have to make annual filings to various government agencies on all of our mineral properties. If we fail to make such filings, or improperly document such filings, the validity of our title to amajor mineral property could be lostacquisition and / or challenged. If any of our mineral interests were challenged, we could incur significant costs in defending such a challenge. These costs or an adverse ruling with regards to any challenge of our titles could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

strategic investment during the year ended December 31, 2016.

 7 

 

(2)        Solitario's compensation program for Named Executive Officers is intended to enable the Company to compete for the best executive talent available.

The Compensation Committee believes shareholders are best served when the Company can attract and retain the highest caliber executives appropriate for a company of our size and complexity. This is done with compensation packages we believe to be fair and competitive. Our operations could be negatively affected byNamed Executive Officers have served Solitario for many years. During 2016 and 2015 the Compensation Committee reviewed published compensation surveys and publically available compensation disclosures of several of our peer group companies (“Peer Group Companies”) for which Solitario competes for executive talent as the Compensation Committee believes that each of these public companies share some attributes of Solitario with regard to similar size to, and in a similar industry as Solitario. These Peer Group Companies included the following companies:

Vista Gold Corp.Midas Gold Corp.
Entree Gold Corp.Riverside Resources Inc.

These reviews were not used to create specific benchmarks applicable to our Named Executive Officer compensation levels. These reviews were used to inform the Compensation Committee of current standards in the industry as such standards may relate, in their independent judgment, to appropriate modifications to Solitario's existing lawscompensation levels. During 2016, Solitario's activities were generally focused on the evaluation of mineral properties for acquisition and on junior mining companies with mineral properties for strategic investment in the form of potential merger, acquisition or sale; during most of 2015 Solitario’s activities were more narrowly focused initially on the development of the Mt. Hamilton project, and subsequently on the marketing and eventual sale of the Mt. Hamilton project, as well as potential changesother early stage exploration. As the focus of Solitario during the two most recent fiscal years did not directly compare in lawsall cases to the activities of the Peer Group Companies, the Compensation Committee took the difference in focus into consideration when reviewing compensation of Solitario’s Named Executive Officers compared to the peer companies. Additionally, Solitario has traditionally maintained a very minimal staff and regulatory requirements to which we are subject, including regulation of mineral exploration and ownership, environmental regulations and taxation.

The exploration and development of mineral properties is subject to federal, state, provincial and local laws and regulationsthe difference in the countriesnumber of total employees of Solitario, which currently has six employees world-wide, compared to the Peer Group Companies; do not lend itself to effective use of specific benchmarks.

Subsequent to the completion of the Transaction, the Compensation Committee, in which we operateconsultation with the Named Executive Officers, in light of the then difficult financial conditions in the junior mining sector as a varietyresult of ways, including regulation of mineral explorationcontinued low precious and land ownership, environmental regulation and taxation. These laws and regulations,base metal prices as well as future interpretationthe reduction in Mt. Hamilton related Company activities, decided to reduce the annual salaries of or changesits Named Executive Officers, as of October 1, 2015; with the salary of Mr. Herald being reduced from $230,000 to existing laws and regulations, may require substantial increases in capital and operating costs$198,000, the salary of Mr. Maronick being reduced from $160,000 to us and delays, interruptions, or a termination of operations.

In the United States$150,000 and the other countriessalary of Mr. Hunt being reduced from $178,000 to $158,000. The Named Executive Officers’ salaries remained at the reduced amount during 2016, except for an increase in which we operate,September 2016 to Mr. Hunt’s salary of $1,000 per month and an increase to Mr. Herald’s salary in orderJune of $500 per month related to obtain permits for exploration or potential future developmentan increase in health care costs. At the beginning of mineral properties, environmental regulations generally require a description2015, based upon the difficult financial markets and the limited financial resources of the existing environment,Company, the Compensation Committee decided to leave the ending annual 2014 salary amounts the same during 2015 with the salary of Mr. Herald at $230,000, the salary of Mr. Maronick at $164,000 and the salary of Mr. Hunt at $178,000. However, to conserve cash resources during 2015, all employees of Solitario, including but not limitedits Named Executive Officers agreed to natural, archeologicaldefer between 15% and socio-economic environments, at34% of the project sitegross cash salary payments due during 2015. Upon completion of the Transaction, and given the strong financial condition of Solitario, all amounts previously deferred during 2015, were paid in the region; an interpretationfourth quarter of 2015.

(3)        Solitario's compensation program for the natureNamed Executive Officers should be fair to the executive, the Company and magnitude of potential environmental impacts that might result fromall its employees and perceived as such, activities;both internally and a description and evaluation of the effectiveness of the operational measures planned to mitigate the environmental impacts. Currently the expenditures to obtain exploration permits to conduct our exploration activities are not material to our total exploration cost.

externally.

The lawsCompensation Committee strives to create a compensation program that promotes good corporate practice, encourages our Named Executive Officers to perform at a high level and regulationspromotes teamwork among our employees. The Compensation Committee takes these goals into consideration by comparison of executive pay in relation to all other Solitario salary costs for internal consistency, and by comparison to both Peer Group Companies and industry salaries for external consistency. In addition, the countries in which we operate are continually changingcompensation program is intended to enhance shareholder value and are generally becoming more restrictive, especially environmental lawsthe Compensation Committee strives to provide transparency and regulations. As part of our ongoing exploration activities, we have made expendituresfull disclosure to comply with such laws and regulations, but such expenditures could substantially increase our costs to achieve compliance in the future. Delays in obtaining or failure to obtain government permits and approvals or significant changes in regulation could have a material adverse effect on our exploration activities, our ability to locate economic mineral deposits, and our potential to sell, joint venture or eventually develop our properties, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.all interested parties.

Occurrence of events for which we are not insured may materially adversely affect our business.

Mineral exploration is subject to risks of human injury, environmental liability and loss of assets. We maintain limited insurance coverage to protect ourselves against certain risks related to loss of assets for equipment in our operations and limited corporate liability coverage; however, we have elected not to have insurance for other risks because of the high premiums associated with insuring those risks or for various other reasons including those risks where insurance may not be available. There are additional risks in connection with investments in parts of the world where civil unrest, war, nationalist movements, political violence or economic crisis are possible. These countries may also pose heightened risks of expropriation of assets, business interruption, increased taxation and a unilateral modification of concessions and contracts. We do not maintain insurance against political risk. Occurrence of events for which we are not insured could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

Severe weather or violent storms could materially affect our operations due to damage or delays caused by such weather.

Our exploration activities in Peru are subject to normal seasonal weather conditions that often hamper and may temporarily prevent exploration or development activities. There is a risk that unexpectedly harsh weather or violent storms could affect areas where we conduct these activities. Delays or damage caused by severe weather could materially affect our operations or our financial position.

Our business is dependent on the market price of commodities and currency exchange rates over which we have no control.

Our operations are significantly affected by changes in the market price of commodities since the evaluation of whether a mineral deposit is commercially viable is heavily dependent upon the market price of the commodities related to any specific project, such as gold or zinc. The price of commodities also affects the value of exploration projects we own or may wish to acquire or joint venture. These commodity prices fluctuate on a daily basis and are affected by numerous factors beyond our control. The supply and demand for commodities, the level of interest rates, the rate of inflation, investment decisions by large holders of these commodities, including governmental reserves, and stability of exchange rates can all cause significant fluctuations in prices. Currency exchange rates relative to the United States dollar can affect the cost of doing business in a foreign country in United States dollar terms, which is our functional currency. Consequently, the cost of conducting exploration in the countries where we operate, accounted for in United States dollars, can fluctuate based upon changes in currency exchange rates and may be higher than we anticipate in terms of United States dollars because of a decrease in the relative strength of the United States dollar to currencies of the countries where we operate. We currently do not hedge against currency or commodity fluctuations. The prices of commodities as well as currency exchange rates have fluctuated widely and future significant price declines in commodities or changes in currency exchange rates could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

 8 

 

The Compensation Committee has no authority to recover salary, bonuses or stock option awards or other equity awards made to Named Executive Officers. Although the Compensation Committee has the ability to consider prior compensation (e.g. gains from prior option grants or other equity awards) in setting current compensation, it has no formal procedure or requirement to do so. The Compensation Committee does not set or utilize benchmarks of any kind to set, evaluate or allocate compensation. There have been no actions taken or adjustments made to the process of setting executive compensation discussed herein by the Compensation Committee subsequent to December 31, 2016.

Our business is dependent on keyKey Elements of Executive Compensation

The elements of the Company’s compensation program are intended to balance long term and short term compensation for its executives and attempt to motivate executives to provide excellent leadership and achieve Company goals by linking short-term (such as salaries and benefits) and long-term incentives (such as equity based compensation) to the lossachievement of anybusiness objectives, thereby aligning the interests of executives and shareholders. In addition the Compensation Committee recognizes the performance of the Company’s Common Stock is often influenced by the general investment climate of the junior mining industry, which is not within the control of the specific performance of the Named Executive Officers in achieving the objectives set by the Company. The key elements of the compensation of the Named Executive Officers are outlined below. The Compensation Committee considers shareholder input when setting compensation for Named Executive Officers. At our 2016 annual meeting of shareholders, greater than 91% of the votes cast on the advisory vote on executive compensation were in favor of our key executives could adversely affectexecutive compensation program. The Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee reviewed these vote results and determined that, given the significant level of support, no major re-examination of our business, future operations and financial condition.executive compensation program was necessary at that time.

(1)Base Salary

 

WeThe Compensation Committee attempts to provide base salary to the Named Executive Officers that is commensurate with their review of our Peer Group Companies. The Compensation Committee fixed the base salary for the Named Executive Officers for 2016 (which commenced on January 1, 2016) during its meeting in September 2015. Increases or decreases in base salary are dependent on the servicesCompensation Committee's evaluation of key executives, including our Chiefeach individual Named Executive Officer Christopher E. Herald, our Chief Operating Officer, Walter H. Hunt, and our Chief Financial Officer, James R. Maronick. Allperformance, the effect of those officers have many yearsa peer group review, the performance of experience and an extensive background with Solitario and in the mining industry in general. We may not be able to replace that experience and knowledge with other individuals. We do not have "Key-Man" life insurance policies on any of our key executives. The loss of these persons or our inability to attract and retain additional highly skilled employees may adversely affect our business, future operations and financial condition.

Our business model relies significantly on other companies to joint venture our projects and we anticipate continuing this practice in the future. Therefore, our results are subjectentire Company relative to the additional risks associated withCompany’s general goals and objectives, and the Company’s current and projected financial condition, operational expertiseresources. No Named Executive Officers receive minimum base salary payments pursuant to any employment agreement, or other written agreement. The Compensation Committee has authority from the Board to set the base salary at any amount it believes is appropriate. Although the Compensation Committee, has used its review of the accomplishments of the Named Executive Officers against general goals of the Company, including planned exploration programs, potential mineral property acquisitions, evaluation of strategic opportunities for a corporate merger, acquisition or sale; the 2015 sale of the Mt. Hamilton project, corporate financing activities and corporate prioritiesmarket price of our joint venture partners.Solitario’s Common Stock, among other things, the Compensation Committee has full discretion to set compensation levels and has not set specific compensation levels to specific criteria. Some of the general criteria are discussed below.

(2)Bonuses

The Compensation Committee may provide bonuses to the Named Executive Officers, in its sole discretion, based upon their evaluation of the individual Named Executive Officer in light of the certain parameters, including the following:

 

(i)Bonuses based upon operational goals and parameters;
(ii)The desire, discussed above, to provide a substantial portion of compensation based on performance
(iii)The performance of the Company relative to Company goals including share price performance;
(iv)The financial strength of the Company, including liquid financial assets;
(v)The quality of mineral property assets, including exploration assets and mineral properties under joint venture; and
(vi)The financial strength and prospects for the smaller (junior) exploration mining industry.

Our Bongará project is joint-ventured with another mining company that manages the exploration and development activities on the project and we are the minority-interest party. Although our joint venture agreements provide certain voting rights and other minority-interest safeguards, the majority partner not only manages operations, but controls most decisions, including budgets and scope and pace of exploration and development activities. Consequently, we are highly dependent on the operational expertise and financial condition of our joint venture partner, as well as its own corporate priorities. For instance, even though our joint venture property may be highly prospective for exploration success, or economically viable based on feasibility studies, our partner may decide to not fund the further exploration or development of our project based on their respective financial condition or other corporate priorities. Therefore, our results are subject to the additional risks associated with the financial condition, operational expertise and corporate priorities of our joint venture partners, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

We may look to joint venture with another mining company in the future to develop and/or operate one of our foreign projects; therefore, in the future, our results may become subject to additional risks associated with development and production of our foreign mining projects.

We are not currently involved in mining development or operating activities at any of our properties. In order to realize a profit from these mineral interests we either have to: (1) sell such properties outright at a profit; (2) form a joint venture for the project with a larger mining company with greater resources, both technical and financial, to further develop and/or operate the project at a profit; (3) develop and operate such projects at a profit on our own; or (4) create and retain a royalty interest in a property with a third party that agrees to advance the property toward development and mining. In the future, if our exploration results show sufficient promise in one of our foreign projects, we may either look to form a joint venture with another mining company to develop and/or operate the project, or sell the property outright and retain partial ownership or a retained royalty based on the success of such project. Therefore, in the future, our results may become subject to the additional risks associated with development and production of mining projects in general.

In the future, we may participate in a transaction to acquire a new property, royalty or another company that requires a substantial amount of capital or the issuance of Solitario equity to complete. Our acquisition costs may never be recovered due to changing market conditions, or our own miscalculation concerning the recoverability of our acquisition investment. Such an occurrence could adversely affect our business, future operations and financial condition.

We have evaluated a wide variety of acquisition opportunities involving mineral properties and companies for acquisition and we anticipate evaluating potential acquisition opportunities in the future. Some of these opportunities may involve a substantial amount of capital or the issuance of Solitario equity to successfully acquire. As many of these opportunities do not have reliable feasibility-level studies, we may have to rely on our own estimates for investment analysis. Such estimates, by their very nature, contain substantial uncertainty. In addition, economic assumptions, such as future costs and commodity prices, also contain significant uncertainty. Consequently, if we are successful in acquiring any new opportunities and our estimates prove to be in error, either through miscalculations or changing market conditions, this could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

 9 

 

In establishing its goals for any particular year, the Compensation Committee strives to ensure that the goals provide both an incentive and an attainable goal that provides shareholders with the opportunity for return on their investment while minimizing corporate and shareholder risk to the extent possible. Although certain targets and goals related certain operational goals, such as to potential property acquisitions and/or potential merger or acquisition activities, if any, are confidential, the Compensation Committee has structured these types of goals to be reasonable and obtainable by our Named Executive Officers, without undue risk to the assets of Solitario. Due to the nature of Solitario's corporate activities relating to (i) the evaluation of mineral properties for acquisition; (iii) the evaluation of strategic opportunities for a corporate merger, acquisition or sale; (iii) the sale of the Mt. Hamilton project during 2015 and (iv) early-stage exploration of mineral properties located in Peru, the goals for Named Executive Officers are not specifically related to traditional financial metrics, such as revenue growth, earnings or earnings per share. The marketoperational targets and goals are more subjective and generally include (i) the evaluation, negotiation and acquisition of mineral property agreements; (ii) evaluation of strategic opportunities; (iii) land and royalty joint ventures on our existing properties, (iv) exploration activities and success, both on our own and through joint ventures; (v) training and retaining employees, (vi) operational activities including: maintaining adequate liquidity to fund future exploration activities, financial reporting and disclosure, and shareholder return. The Compensation Committee also evaluates the financial strength and prospects for sharesthe junior exploration segment of the mining industry. The Compensation Committee reviews the annual goals with the Named Executive Officers at or near the start of each year. The evaluation of the performance of our common stock has limited liquidity and the market price of our common stock has fluctuated and may decline.

An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. The liquidity of our shares, or the ability of a shareholder to buy or sell our common stock, may be significantly limited for various unforeseeable periods. The average combined daily volume of our shares traded on the NYSE MKT and the TSX during 2016 was approximately 81,000 shares. The market price of our shares has historically fluctuated within a wide range. The price of our common stock may be affected by many factors, including an adverse change in our business, a decline in the price of gold or other commodity prices, negative news on our projects, negative investment sentiment for mining and commodity equities and general economic trends.

We are dependent upon information technology systems, which are subject to disruption, damage, failure and risks associated with implementation and integration.

We are dependent upon information technology systems in the conduct of our operations. Our information technology systems are subject to disruption, damage or failure from a variety of sources, including, without limitation, computer viruses, security breaches, cyber-attacks, natural disasters and defects in design. Cybersecurity incidents, in particular, are evolving and include, but are not limited to, malicious software, attempts to gain unauthorized access to data and other electronic security breaches that could lead to disruptions in systems, unauthorized release of confidential or otherwise protected information and the corruption of data. Various measures have been implemented to manage our risks related to information technology systems and network disruptions. However, given the unpredictability of the timing, nature and scope of information technology disruptions, we could potentially be subject to operational delays, the compromising of confidential or otherwise protected information, destruction or corruption of data, security breaches, other manipulation or improper use of our systems and networks or financial losses from remedial actions, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, competitive position, financial condition or results of operations.

Failure to comply with the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) could subject us to penalties and other adverse consequences.

As a Colorado corporation, we are subjectNamed Executive Officers, relative to the FCPA and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws, which generally prohibit United States companies and their intermediaries from engaging in bribery or other improper payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Foreign companies, including some that may compete with our company, are not subject to U.S. laws and regulations, including the FCPA, and therefore our exploration, development, production and mine closure activities are subject to the disadvantage of competing against companies from countries that are not subject to these prohibitions.

In addition, we could be adversely affected by violations of the FCPA and similar anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions. Corruption, extortion, bribery, pay-offs, theft and other fraudulent practices may occur from time-to-time in the countries outside of the United States in which we operate. Our mineral properties are located in countries that may have experienced governmental corruption to some degree and, in certain circumstances, strict compliance with anti-bribery laws may conflict with local customs and practices. Our policies mandate compliance with these anti-bribery laws; however, we cannot assure you that our internal controls and procedures always will protect us from the reckless or criminal acts committed by our employees or agents. We can make no assurance that our employees or other agents will not engage in such conduct for which we might be held responsible. If our employees or other agents are found to have engaged in such practices or we are found to be liable for FCPA violations, we could suffer severe criminal or civil penalties or other sanctions and other consequences that may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments

None

10

Item 2.Properties

Joint Ventures and Strategic Alliance Properties

Bongará Zinc Project (Peru)

1.Property Description and Location

 

(Map of Bongará Property)

The Bongará project consists of 16 concessions comprising 12,600 hectares of mineral rights granted to Minera Bongará S.A., our subsidiary incorporated in Peru. The property is located in the Department of Amazonas, northern Peru. On August 15, 2006, Solitario signed a Letter Agreement with Votorantim Metais Cajamarquilla, S.A., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Votorantim Metais (both companies referred to as "Votorantim”) on Solitario's 100%-owned Bongará zinc project (the “Bongará Letter Agreement”). On March 24, 2007, Solitario signed the Framework Agreement with Votorantim for the Exploration and Potential Development of Mining Properties, (the "Framework Agreement") pursuant to, and replacing, the Bongará Letter Agreement. Solitario's and Votorantim's property interests are held through the ownership of shares in Minera Bongará S.A., a joint operating company that holds a 100% interest in the mineral rights and other project assets. Solitario currently owns 39% of the shares in Minera Bongará S.A.

During 2015 Votorantim completed the steps required to earn a 61% interest in the Bongará project, with Solitario retaining a 39% interest. In addition, Solitario consented to the transfer of Votorantim’s interest in both the Bongará and Chambara projects to Compañía Minera Milpo S.A.A. (“Milpo”). Milpo, an 80%-owned affiliate of Votorantim, is traded on the Lima exchange under the symbol MILPOCI.

Milpo may earn an additional 9% interest (up to a 70% shareholding interest) in Minera Bongará S.A., by funding future annual exploration and development expenditures until a production decision is made. The option to earn the 70% interest can be exercised by Milpo at any time by committing to place the project into production based upon a completed feasibility study. Milpo is the project manager. Once Milpo has committed to place the project into production based upon a feasibility study, it has further agreed to finance Solitario's 30% participating interest until production with a loan facility from Milpo to Solitario. Solitario will repay this loan facility through 50% of Solitario's cash flow distributions from the joint operating company.

According to Peruvian law, concessions may be held indefinitely, subject only to payment of annual fees to the government. In June 2017, payments of approximately $140,000 to the Peruvian government will be due in order to maintain the mineral rights of Minera Bongará. Milpo is responsible for paying these costs as part of its work commitment. Peru also imposes a sliding scale net smelter return royalty (“NSR”) on all precious and base metal production of 1% on all gross annual proceeds from production up to $60,000,000, a 2% NSR on annual proceeds between $60,000,000 and $120,000,000 and a 3% NSR on annual proceeds in excess of $120,000,000. From time to time Milpo may enter into surface rights agreements with individual landowners or communities to provide access for exploration work. Generally, these are short-term agreements.

Environmental permits are required for exploration and development projects in Peru that involve drilling, road building or underground mining. The requisite environmental and archeological studies were completed for all past work, but new studies are required for the expanded activities planned for future years. Although we believe that these permits will be obtained in a timely fashion, the timing of government approval of permits remains beyond our control.

2.Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiology

The Bongará property is accessed by the paved Carretera Marginal road, which provides access from the coastal city of Chiclayo. The nearest town is Pedro Ruiz located 15 kilometers southeast of the property, and the Carretera Marginal, a heavily travelled paved national highway, is situated approximately eight kilometers south of the deposit. The area of the majority of past drilling and the most prospective mineralization, Florida Canyon, was previously inaccessible by road, the work to date having been done by either foot or helicopter access. Milpo has now completed approximately 30 kilometers of access road. Milpo maintains project field offices in Pedro Ruiz and a drill core processing facility and operations office in the nearby community of Shipasbamba.   The climate is tropical and the terrain is mountainous and jungle covered. Seasonal rains hamper exploration work by limiting access for four to five months of the year, November through March. Several small villages are located within five kilometers of the drilling area.

3.History

We discovered the Florida Canyon mineralized zone of the Bongará Project in 1996. Subsequently, we optioned the property in December 1996 to Cominco (now Teck Resources). Cominco drilled 80 core holes from 1997-2000. Cominco withdrew from the joint venture in February 2001, and Solitario retained its 100% interest in the project. We maintained the claims from 2001 to 2006, until the Bongará Letter Agreement was signed. Votorantim conducted surface drilling on an annual basis from 2006 to 2013 and underground tunneling and drilling from 2010 to 2013. All significant work on the propertygoals outlined herein, has been conducted by our joint venture partners: Cominco, Votorantim and now Milpo, and is described below in Section 5, “Prior Exploration.”

11

4.Geological Setting

The geology of the Bongará area is relatively simple consisting of a sequence of Jurassic and Triassic clastic and carbonate rocks which are gently deformed. The Mississippi Valley type zinc-lead mineralization occurs in the carbonate facies of the Chambara (rock) Formation. This sedimentary sequence is part of what is referred to as the Pucura Group that hosts mineral deposits throughout Peru.

5.Prior Exploration

We conducted a regional stream sediment survey and reconnaissance geological surveys leading to the discovery of the Florida Canyon area in 1996. The discovered outcropping mineralization is located in two deeply incised canyons within the limestone stratigraphy.

Subsequent to our initial work, Cominco conducted extensive mapping, soil and rock sampling, stream sediment surveys and drilling. This work was designed to determine the extent and grade of the zinc-lead mineralization, the controls of mineral deposition and to identify areas of potential new mineralization. Votorantim began work in the fall of 2006 and worked continuously on the project until it transferred its interest to Milpo, in 2015. All work performed by us, Cominco, Votorantim or Milpo was done by direct employees of the respective companies with the exception of the drilling, underground tunneling, helicopter services and road building, all of which were performed by third-party contractors under the direction of Cominco, Votorantim or Milpo.

6.Mineralization

Mineralization occurs as massive to semi-massive replacements of sphalerite and galena localized by specific sedimentary facies (rock strata) within the limestone stratigraphy and by structural feeders and karst breccias. Approximately two-thirds of mineralization is sulfide dominant and a third is oxide-dominant. A total of 11 preferred beds for replacement mineralization have been located within the middle unit of the Chambara Formation. Mineralization is associated with the conversion of limestone to dolomite, which creates porosity and permeability within the rock formations, promoting the passage of mineralizing fluids through the rock formations forming stratigraphically controlled near-horizontal manto deposits and structurally controlled near-vertical replacement deposits. Drilling of stratigraphic targets has shown that certain coarser-grained facies of the stratigraphy are the best hosts for mineralization.

Karst features are localized along faults and locally produce "breakout zones" where mineralization may extend vertically across thick stratigraphic intervals along the faults where collapse breccias have been replaced by ore minerals. Mineralized karst structures are up to 50 meters in width (horizontal), up to 100 meters vertically, and up to hundreds of meters along strike.

Evidence for these breakout zones is provided by the following drill holes from various locations on the property:

Breakout
Zone Name
 Drill Hole
Number
 Intercepts
(meters)
 Zinc
%
 Lead
%
 Zinc+Lead
%
Sam GC-17
FC-23
 58.8
81.5
 12.0
4.8
 2.8
0.8
 14.8
5.6
Karen A-1  36.2   12.8   2.7   15.5 
North Zone V-21  92.0   5.5   1.7   7.2 
South Zone V-44
V-169
  28.3
51.6
   15.2
7.1
   0.8
0.7
   16.0
7.8
 
San Jorge V-297  56.6   22.69   1.15   23.84 

Stratigraphically controlled mineralization is typically one to several meters in thickness, but often attains thicknesses of five to ten meters. Generally the known stratigraphic mineralization, while thinner, is of higher grade and laterally more extensive.

Dolomitization reaches stratigraphic thicknesses in excess of 100 meters locally. This alteration is thought to be related to the mineralizing event in most cases and is an important exploration tool. Continuity of the mineralization is demonstrable in areas of highest drilling density by correlation of mineralization within characteristic sedimentary facies, typical of specific stratigraphic intervals or within through-going observable structural zones in drill core.

12

7.Drilling

From 1997 through 2001, Cominco drilled 80 surface core holes totaling 24,696 meters. From 2006-2013, Votorantim completed 309 surface core holes totaling 77,193 meters. From 2011-2013, Votorantim completed 95 underground core holes totaling 15,144 meters. The majority of Votorantim’s surface drilling was infill drilling designed to demonstrate the continuity and geometry of mineralization, and to a lesser extent, test for extensions of known mineralization. The underground drilling was conducted from 10 drill stations at generally 40-meter centers (two drill stations at 20-meter centers) and entirely within the San Jorge mineralized zone. Anywhere from three to 14 holes were drilled from each of the eight drill stations. The underground drilling was tightly spaced and designed to allow for feasibility-level reserve estimation.

All drilling conducted is within a footprint measuring approximately 2.5 kilometers long in a north-south direction and a little over a kilometer in an east-west direction. The entire drill pattern is within what we have informally labeled the Florida Canyon district. Within this district, several zones of strong zinc mineralization have been defined. The two zones with the largest amount of drilling are the San Jorge and the Karen-Milagros zones. Drilling indicates that, for the most part, the entire Florida Canyon district remains open to expansion.

8.Sampling, Analysis and Security of Samples

Core samples were transported from the drill by helicopter in sealed boxes to the processing facility in Shipasbamba where they were split by a diamond saw. Half of the core was taken of intervals selected according to geologic criteria under the supervision of the geologist in charge and shipped in sealed bags by land. Cominco used SGS Laboratories and Votorantim used ALS-Chemex, both in Lima, Peru, where all samples were analyzed by ICP. Any samples that contained greater than 1% zinc were then analyzed by wet chemistry assay for zinc and lead to provide a more accurate analysis of grade.

Since April 2015, Milpo has been in control of all field activities on the project and is responsible for the security of samples. Milpo has indicated to us that there have been no breaches in the security of the samples. We have reviewed and engaged SRK Consulting (USA) Inc. (“SRK”) (a large independent international mining engineering firm) to review Milpo’s sampling procedures and believe that adequate procedures are in place to ensure the future security and integrity of samples. No breaches of security of samples are known to have occurred prior to Milpo’s work on the project.

9.Prefeasibility Studies

Votorantim and Milpo, either through its engineering staff or contracted independent mining engineering firms, has conducted prefeasibility-level studies to provide estimates of deposit size and grade, sizing of appropriate scale of operations, infrastructure design, and capital and operating cost estimates on a scoping level of detail. Votorantim has engaged an independent metallurgical testing firm to evaluate metal recoveries and various processing options for mineralized material at Florida Canyon. Tests to date on composited samples indicate zinc recoveries of 91.8% and lead recoveries of 81.9% in the San Jorge zone and zinc recoveries of 80.3% and lead recoveries of 71.7% in the Karen-Milagros zone.

In 2013 Votorantim drilled 16 diamond core holes evaluating geotechnical and hydrological parameters of the mineralized areas for both engineering and environmental purposes. Votorantim also completed detailed geology-mineralization modeling to develop an internal resource estimate as part of their ongoing pre-feasibility efforts. Additionally, Votorantim completed scoping-level infrastructure design and costing analysis for the project. In 2016, Milpo completed a geochemical/metallurgical study that more accurately defined the distribution of sulfide/oxide mineralization based on re-assaying of past drill hole samples.

10.Reserves and Resources

There are no reported mineral reserves.

11.Mining Operations

No commercial mining operations to recover metals have occurred on the project. However, in September 2010 Votorantim initiated an underground tunneling program to access mineralization. As of December 31, 2016, 700 meters of tunneling were completed.

13

12.Planned Exploration and Development

In early 2017, Solitario engaged SRK to complete a Preliminary Economic Assessment (“PEA”) of the Florida Canyon deposit. The PEA will be based on Milpo’s recent geochemical/metallurgical work and other previous work, including metallurgical, resource estimation and engineering. The focus of the study will be to characterize the economic potential of the sulfide component of the mineralization. The PEA is expected to continue to be completed byat the enddiscretion of the second-quarter 2017. SRK is an independent and internationally recognized mining engineering firm with offices in both Peru andCompensation Committee. As discussed above, In December of 2016, the United States, among other international locations. SRK previously prepared a NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources for the Bongará Project in 2014.

Chambara Zinc Property (Peru)

In April 2008, we signed the Minera Chambara shareholders’ agreement with Votorantim for the exploration of a large area of interest in northern Peru measuring approximately 200 by 85 kilometers. In 2015 Milpo became the project manager funding and conducting all exploration on the project. Votorantim originally contributed 52 mineral concessions within the area of interest totaling 52,000 hectares to Minera Chambara for a 15% interest in Minera Chambara. We contributed 9,600 hectares of mineral claims and certain exploration data in our possession for an 85% interest in Minera Chambara. Existing and future acquired properties subject to the terms of the shareholders’ agreement will be controlled by Minera Chambara. In 2013 and 2016, Minera Chambara dropped selected concessions, resulting in Minera Chambara now holding 28 concessions totaling 22,000 hectares of valid concessions. As of December 31, 2016, Minera Chambara’s only assets are the properties and Minera Chambara hasCompensation Committee determined that no debt. Milpo may increase its shareholding interest to 49% through cumulative spending of $6,250,000, and may further increase its interest to 70% by funding a feasibility study and providing for construction financing for Solitario's interest. If Milpo provides such construction financing, we would repay that financing, including interest, from 80% of Solitario's portion of the project cash flow.

 The project is currently on care and maintenance. No field work is proposed for 2017, but Milpo is responsible for maintaining the property in good standing and making all concession payments to the Peruvian government.

Newmont Alliance and the La Promesa Project (Peru)

On January 18, 2005, we signed a Strategic Alliance Agreement (the "Alliance Agreement") with Newmont Overseas Exploration Limited ("Newmont") to explore for gold in South America (the "Strategic Alliance"). Concurrent with the signing of the Alliance Agreement, Newmont Mining Corporation of Canada made an equity investment in Solitario, a portion of which Solitario spent on exploration on Strategic Alliance areas covered by the Alliance Agreement. Under the terms of the Alliance Agreement, we granted Newmont a 2% NSR on properties included in the Strategic Alliance areas including the La Promesa project. If we meet certain minimum exploration expenditures on the project, Newmont will have the right to joint venture it and earn up to a 75% interest by taking the project through feasibility and financing Solitario's retained 25% interest into production.

The La Promesa property, acquired in 2008, consists of three concessions totaling 2,600 hectares. Our only holding costs for the mineral rights are annual payments of three dollars or nine dollars per hectare, depending on the age of the claims, to the Peruvian government. Total holding costs in 2017 will be approximately $8,000. During 2017 we intend to continue to pursue an agreement with the local community to conduct surface exploration.

At least five high-grade polymetallic veins have been identified and sampled at surface. Two of the veins, about 300 meters apart, have been traced for at least 400 meters along strike. There appears to be a systematic trend towards greater vein thickness with depth, as the widest observed vein in outcrop occurs at the lowest elevation sampled to date. Channel sampling along 300 meters of strike length from the best exposed vein yielded the following high-grade results:

Chip Channel # True Width Silver gpt % Zinc % Lead Indium gpt
A  2.8   758   19.4   7.2   153 
B  1.1   181   21.0   2.4   190 
C  0.5   433   10.5   6.3   23 
D  0.4   458   10.2   10.8   15 
E  1.0   346   5.9   3.4   27 
F  1.2   1975   33.1   5.6   430 

14

Royalty Properties

Yanacocha Royalty Property (Peru)

The Yanacocha royalty property consists of 69 concessions totaling approximately 61,000 hectares in northern Peru, 25 kilometers north of the city of Cajamarca. The property position consists of a rectangular-shaped contiguous block of concessions nearly 50 kilometers long in an east-west direction and 25 kilometers wide in a north-south direction. The southern boundary of the royalty property abuts Newmont Mining Corporation's Minera Yanacocha mining operation, a large gold mine currently in operation. We held 100% interest in the concessions until April 2000, at which time we signed an agreement with Newmont Peru, Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Newmont Mining Corporation (both companies referred to as "Newmont Peru"), whereby we sold our Yanacocha Property to Newmont Peru for $6,000,000 and retained a sliding scale net smelter return royalty ("NSR-Royalty") that varied from two to five percent, depending on the price of gold.

In January 2005 we signed an Amended and Restated Royalty Grant with affiliates of Newmont Peru to modify the NSR-Royalty schedule. The modified royalty structure is classified into several categories, depending on the type of process used to recover each metal, gold silver and copper prices, as well as any government royalty burden imposed by Peru on the project ores. Assuming the current maximum royalty due the government of Peru and gold prices above $500 per ounce, our gold royalty ranges from 1% to 2¾%, our silver royalty would be 2% and our copper royalty would be 1%. No resources or reserves have been reported by Newmont, nor has any mining been conducted on the property.

Pedra Branca Platinum-Palladium Metals Project (Brazil)

During 2015 we converted our operating interest in the Pedra Branca project to a 1% NSR interest. The Pedra Branca platinum-palladium (“PGM”) project consisted of 57 exploration concessions totaling approximately 70,000 hectares in Ceará State, Brazil. The property is now owned by Garrison Capital Partners Limited, a Dubai, UAE company, which controls all activities related to the Pedra Branca project.

Montana royalty property (United States)

In May 2016 we acquired a 1.5% net smelter royalty on non-producing exploration properties covering 16,548 acres in Montana previously owned by Atna Resources, Ltd. for $40,000.

Norcan and Aconchi royalty properties (Mexico)

In June 2010 we acquired the 35,991 hectare Norcan Copper property located north of the Cananea mine, in the State of Sonora, Mexico. Geochemical and biogeochemical surveys in this area exhibit locally anomalous copper values. We acquired the 8,200 hectare Aconchi property in northern Sonora, Mexico in October 2010. It is an early-stage property that displays copper and other trace element anomalies in soils. Upon the closure of our Mexico exploration officebonus was earned during 2016, we retained a 1% net smelter royalty on both the Norcan and Aconchi exploration projects. We had previously written down both exploration projects and have no capitalized costs related to the Norcan or Aconchi royalties as of December 31, 2016.

Discontinued Projects

During 2016, we closed our exploration office in Mexico. We retained a 1% royalty on both our Norcan and Aconchi exploration projects in Mexico. Solitario recorded a mineral property write-down of $10,000 related to the Norcan and Aconchi properties during 2016. During 2016, Solitario abandoned its interest in its Canta Colorado property in Peru and recorded a mineral property write-down expense of $3,000 related to Canta Colorado.

During 2015, Solitario converted its operating interest in Pedra Branca Mineracao, Ltd (“PBM”), which was the owner of the Pedra Branca project in Brazil, to a 1% net smelter royalty in the Pedra Branca project, upon the termination of its interest in PBM. Solitario had no remaining asset value related to its investment in PBM as it had accounted for its interest in PBM under the equity method of accounting and had recognizing a reduction of its remaining interest in PBM to zero prior to the year ended December 31, 2015. Solitario recorded no mineral property write-down expense during 2015.

GLOSSARY OF MINING TERMS

Assay” means to test minerals by chemical or other methods2016 and the Named Executive Officers would not be paid a bonus for the purpose of determining the amount of valuable metals contained.year ended 2016 during 2017.

Breccia” means rock consisting of fragments, more or less angular, in a matrix of finer-grained material or of cementing material.

Claim” or “Concession” means a mining interest giving its holder the right to prospect, explore for and exploit minerals within a defined area.

15(3)Equity

“Clastic” means pertaining to rock or rocks composed of fragments or particles of older rocks or previously existing solid matter; fragmental.

Deposit” means an informal term for an accumulation of mineral ores.

“Development”means work carried out for the purpose of opening up a mineral deposit and making the actual ore extraction possible.

Dolomite” means calcium magnesium carbonate, CaMg (CO3)2, occurring in crystals and in masses.

“Facies” means the appearance and characteristics of a sedimentary deposit, especially as they reflect the conditions and environment of deposition and serve to distinguish the deposit from contiguous deposits.

Fault” means a fracture in rock along which there has been displacement of the two sides parallel to the fracture.

“gpt”means grams per tonne.

“Karst” meansa landscape that is characterized by the features of solution weathering and erosion in the subsurface. These features include caves, sinkholes, disappearing streams, subsurface drainage and deeply incised narrow canyons.

“Manto deposits” means replacement ore bodies that are strata bound, irregular to rod shaped ore occurrences usually horizontal or near horizontal in attitude.

Mineralization” means the concentration of metals within a body of rock.

NSR” means net smelter return royalty.

“opt” or“oz/ton”means ounces per ton.

Ore” means material containing minerals that can be economically extracted.

“Ounce” means a troy ounce.

Reserves” or “Ore Reserves” means that part of a mineral deposit, which could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination.

Sampling” means selecting a fractional, but representative, part of a mineral deposit for analysis.

Sediment” means solid material settled from suspension in a liquid.

“Sphalerite” means a very common mineral, zinc sulfide, usually containing some iron and a little cadmium, occurring in yellow, brown, or black crystals or cleavable masses with resinous luster and it is the principal ore of zinc.

“Stratigraphy” means the arrangement of rock strata, especially as to the geographic, chronologic order of sequence (age), classification, characteristics and formation.

Strike” when used as a noun, means the direction, course or bearing of a vein or rock formation measured on a level surface and, when used as a verb, means to take such direction, course or bearing.

Sulfide” means a compound of sulfur and some other element.

Ton” means a short ton (2,000 pounds).

Tonne” means a metric ton that contains 2,204.6 pounds or 1,000 kilograms.

Vein” means a fissure, fault or crack in a rock filled by minerals that have traveled upwards from some deep source.

Item 3.Legal Proceedings

None

Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable

16

PART II

Item 5.Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common stock trades on the NYSE MKT under the symbol “XPL” and on the TSX under the symbol “SLR.” Since 2008 trading volume of our stock on NYSE MKT has exceeded the trading volume of our stock on the TSX by a substantial margin.

 

The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices on NYSE MKT for our common stock for the quarterly periods from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2016:

  All prices are in US$
  2016 2015
Period High Low High Low
First quarter $0.56  $0.42  $0.95  $0.74 
Second quarter  0.58   0.43   0.83   0.52 
Third quarter  0.91   0.60   0.65   0.45 
Fourth quarter  0.77   0.58   0.58   0.44 
                 

The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices on the TSX for our common stock for the quarterly periods from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2016:

  All prices are in CDN$
  2016 2015
Period High Low High Low
First quarter $0.72  $0.60  $1.18  $0.92 
Second quarter  0.73   0.58   0.96   0.70 
Third quarter  1.20   0.73   0.80   0.57 
Fourth quarter  0.99   0.76   0.74   0.57 
                 

Shares authorized for issuance underonly equity compensation plans

On June 18, 2013, Solitario's shareholders approvedour Named Executive Officers have historically received is in the form of stock options granted pursuant to the 2006 Stock Option Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”) and the 2013 Solitario Exploration & Royalty Corp. Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan (the "2013 Plan"“2013 Plan”). Under, with the exercise price of such options equal to the current market value of our Common Stock at the date of grant. The Compensation Committee believes that a portion of our Named Executive Officers’ compensation should be performance based and tied to the long term value of the Company. The Compensation Committee also believes that our compensation policies should be fair to our shareholders, and be focused on our long-term viability. The Compensation Committee believes the granting of stock options or other forms of equity based compensation aligns the interests of the Named Executive Officers and our shareholders and provides the incentive to manage the Company from the perspective of an owner of the Company. In addition, the Compensation Committee believes the vesting terms of the stock options granted from the 2013 Plan, discussed below, provide that a significant portion of the compensation will be received at a future date, which provides a tempered longer-term incentive for our Named Executive Officers as well as an incentive for them to remain with the Company.

The amount of all individual grants and the grant date of the stock options have been determined periodically by the Compensation Committee or by the full Board. All grants to date are as of the date of the approval by the Compensation Committee (or the full Board, if requested by the Compensation Committee) at the fair market value on the date of grant. To date, all option grants from the 2006 Plan and the 2013 Plan vest 25% on the date of grant and the remaining options vest at 25% per year on the anniversary of the grant over a three-year period. On July 28, 2016 the Board of Directors may grant awards of stockgranted 1,699,000 options stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, and restricted stock units. A total of 1,750,000 shares of common stock were initially reserved for issuance under the 2013 Plan. AsPlan, which included 450,000 options to Mr. Herald, 330,000 options to Mr. Hunt, and 309,000 options to Mr. Maronick. On August 24, 2016, the holders of December 31, 2016, a total of 1,699,438 shares of Solitario common stock are availableoptions voluntarily surrendered for issuance of future awards undercancellation all options previously granted to such persons pursuant to the 2013 Plan. As of December 31, 2016, there are no outstanding options or other awards under the 2013 Plan.

On June 27, 2006, Solitario's shareholders approved the 2006 Stock Option Incentive Plan (the "2006 Plan"). A total of 2,800,000 shares of common stock were initially reserved for issuance under the 2006 Plan. On June 26, 2016,and the 2006 Plan, terminatedincluding Mr. Herald, Mr. Hunt and perMr. Maronick. Solitario cancelled the terms of the 2006 Plan, no additional shares may be granted from the 2006 Plan.options upon surrender. As of December 31, 2016,a result, there are no outstanding options under either the 2006 Plan.Plan or the 2013 Plan as of December 31, 2016.

In the future, our officers and directors may receive additional equity based awards pursuant to the 2013 Plan, which may take the form of stock options or the other forms of awards including restricted stock awards, restricted stock units or stock appreciation rights.

10

Allocation between the Key Elements of Compensation

The Compensation Committee has complete discretion in allocating total compensation between the key elements of compensation discussed above. Each of the individual components of compensation is evaluated by the Compensation Committee independently and each component is not evaluated based upon the other components. The Compensation Committee has not developed a set formula (such as fair value of equity compensation to equal 50% of base salary) to allocate the elements of compensation to each individual Named Executive Officer.

Employment Agreements

None of our Named Executive Officers have ongoing employment agreements other than individual Change in Control Severance Benefits Agreements, discussed under “Change in Control Agreements” below.

Change in Control Agreements

The Compensation Committee and Solitario consider it essential to the best interest of its shareholders to foster the continuous employment of key management personnel. In this regard, the Compensation Committee and Board recognize that, as is the case with many publicly held corporations and their subsidiaries, the possibility of a change in control may exist and that such possibility, and the uncertainty and questions which it may raise among management, may result in the departure or distraction of management personnel to the detriment of the Company and its shareholders.

Accordingly, on March 14, 2007, the Compensation Committee approved separate Change in Control Severance Benefits Agreements (each a "CIC") for each of the persons serving as our Named Executive Officers, Mr. Herald, Mr. Maronick and Mr. Hunt. Each CIC provides for the payment of severance benefits if the employment of one of the Named Executive Officers is terminated during a period of three years following the last day of the month in which a Change in Control of Solitario (as defined in the CIC) occurs equal to 2.5 times the base salary of the Named Executive Officer. In addition any unvested stock options held by the Named Executive Officer will vest upon the Change in Control. The CIC provides an additional gross up for any taxes due as a result of Excise Tax, as defined by Section 4999 of the Code.

Generally, the CIC defines a "Change in Control" as (i) a person acquiring more than 50% of the outstanding stock of the Company, (ii) the shareholders of the Company approving a merger or acquisition whereby more than 50% of the outstanding shares held prior to the vote will be held by a new person or corporation, (iii) the shareholders of the Company approving the sale or disposition of substantially all of the company's assets or (iv) the shareholders of the Company approving a plan of liquidation or dissolution of the Company. During 2015, the Company determined that the Transaction did not constitute a Change in Control as defined in each CIC and did not trigger any compensation due to an officer that is a party to a CIC.

Benefits are payable under each CIC after a Change in Control if the Named Executive Officer terminates his employment for "good reason," or is terminated by the Company, other than for "cause." "Good reason" is generally defined as a reduction in the compensation, level of responsibility or forced relocation, among other things. "Cause" is generally defined in the CIC as the conviction of a felony, gross and willful failure to perform assigned duties, and dishonest conduct that is intentional and materially injurious to the Company.

Tax Implications of Executive Compensation

Under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Company generally receives a tax deduction for compensation on payments which total less than $1,000,000 paid to our Named Executive Officers, unless that compensation is performance based. The total non-performance based compensation for any of our Named Executive Officers did not exceed $1,000,000 during 2016, nor do we anticipate it will exceed $1,000,000 for the foreseeable future.

11

Stock Ownership Guidelines

Solitario has not established formal stock ownership guidelines for our Named Executive Officers. The Company's Insider Trading Policy prohibits the Named Executive Officers, as well as other insiders, who may have access to material inside information, from purchasing, selling, entering into short sale transactions, engaging in hedging or offsetting transactions regarding Solitario's Common Stock during periods where such persons have access to material inside information.

Compensation Policies with Regard to Risk Management

The Board is responsible for the overall risk management of the Company. Solitario is subject to the inherent risks involved in the exploration and development of mineral properties and shareholders should carefully review Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. However, Solitario does not have any compensation plans or incentives for our Named Executive Officers or any employee for any risk taking activity or risk management activities. Solitario does not engage in activities that have traditional incentives for financial risk taking activities, such as buying or selling derivatives or other similar instruments, other than our limited use of derivatives to reduce our exposure to our holdings of Kinross common stock and the holdings of Vendetta Mining Corp. (“Vendetta”) warrants, which were acquired during 2016.

Role of the Chief Executive Officer in Compensation Decisions

The Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) annually reviews the performance of all other Named Executive Officers. The performance of the CEO is reviewed by the Chairman of the Compensation Committee. The conclusions and recommendations, which include salary, bonus and equity grants, if any, are presented to the Compensation Committee, which has absolute discretion in modifying or applying any of the recommendations for the Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee presents its conclusions and recommendations to the Board for their input and review.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table provides summary information regarding compensation earned by our Named Executive Officers for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Name and Principal  Position Year Salary
($)
 Bonus
($)(1)
 Stock Awards
($)
 Option Awards
($)(2)(4)
 Non-equity incentive plan compensation Change in
Pension
Value and Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
 All
Other
Compensation
($)(3)
 Total
($)
Mr. Herald, CEO  2016   201,000   —     —     225,036   —     —     28,596   307,096 
   2015   222,000   60,000   —     —     —     —     25,096   307,096 
                                     
Mr. Maronick, CFO  2016   150,000   —     —     154,525   —     —     28,596   225,596 
   2015   160,500   40,000   —     —     —     —     25,096   225,596 
                                     
Mr. Hunt, COO  2016   163,000   —     —     165,026   —     —     27,212   242,096 
   2015   173,000   44,000   —     —     —     —     25,096   242,096 
                                    
(1)Amount for bonus earned during the year. No bonus amount was earned during 2016.
(2)The amount represents the grant date fair value of option awards granted during the year in accordance with FASB ASC No. 718. See Note 9, “Employee Stock Compensation Plans” to the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion regarding assumptions used to calculate fair value.
a.The 2016 options were granted from the 2013 Plan on July 28, 2016, had a five-year term and vested 25% on grant date and 25% on the next three anniversary dates. The assumptions used in determining our 2016 grant date fair value are based upon a Black-Scholes model using a five year term, historical volatility of 63% and a risk-free interest rate of 0.9%.
b.On August 24, 2016, holders of option awards from the 2013 Plan voluntarily cancelled awards for 1,699,000 options with an option price of $.072 with an expiration date of July 27, 2021 to allow Solitario to have

additional financial flexibility. No consideration was given or received by the holders of the options to cancel the awards. Included in the cancellation of those awards were all of the options granted during 2016 to the Named Executive Officers, including 450,000 options to Mr. Herald, 330,000 options to Mr. Hunt and 309,000 options to Mr. Maronick.

(3)Mr. Herald, Mr. Maronick and Mr. Hunt each received $24,000 401(K) match during 2016 and 2015. Mr. Herald and Mr. Maronick each received $4,596 and $1,096, respectively for contributions to their health savings account during 2016 and 2015. Mr. Hunt received $3,212 and $1,096, respectively, for contributions to his health savings account during 2016 and 2015.
(4)Mr. Herald, Mr. Hunt and Mr. Maronick have no stock options outstanding at December 31, 2016.

12

Option exercises and Stock Vested

There were no exercises of stock options during the year ended December 31, 2016 or 2015 by our Named Executive Officers.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

There are no outstanding equity awards at December 31, 2016.

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information as of December 31, 2016:
Plan category Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights
(2006 Plan -Cdn$)
(2013 Plan – US$)
 Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
2013 Plan (a) (b) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by
 security holders
  —    N/A  1,699,438 
Equity compensation plans not approved
 by security holders
  —    N/A  —   
                  Total 2013 Plan  —    N/A  1,699,438 

 

17

HoldersCompensation of our common stockDirectors

 

As of March 10, 2017, we have approximately 3,612 holders ofIn addition to any options granted pursuant to the 2006 Plan and the 2013 Plan, our common stock.directors receive the following compensation in their capacities as directors:

Annual Director retainer fee$9,000 ($2,250 per quarter)
Additional Chairman fee$5,000 ($1,250 per quarter)
Additional Vice Chairman fee$3,000 ($750 per quarter)
Additional Audit Committee Chairman fee$2,000 ($500 per quarter)

 

Dividend policy

We have notAll the above referenced fees were paid a dividendquarterly during the year ended December 31, 2016. Fees cover participation in our historyall board and do not anticipate paying a dividend incommittee meetings, including the foreseeable future.

Issuer purchasesposition of equity securities

all committee chairmen (excluding audit chairman who receives an additional fee). A deduction of $1,000 is made for any regularly scheduled board meeting (four quarterly meetings) that is missed. The above director fees were increased for 2017 to $13,000 per annum, plus $6,000 per annum additional Chairman fee, $4,000 per annum additional Audit Committee Chairman fee, and $2,000 per annum Compensation Committee Chairman fee.

The following table provides summary information aboutregarding compensation earned by our purchase of our common sharesdirectors during the three months ended December 31, 2016.

PeriodTotal Number of Shares PurchasedAverage Price Paid Per ShareTotal Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs(1)Maximum number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs(1)
October 1, 2016 – October 31, 2016-    $   -    -    1,431,000  
November 1, 2016—November 30, 201627,000  $0.65  27,000  1,404,000  
December 1, 2016—December 31, 201624,600  $0.68  24,600  1,379,400  

 

 

 

    

(1)       On October 28, 2015, our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program pursuant to which we may acquire up to 2 million of our common shares. All purchases listed were made in open-market transactions through a broker dealer. During 2016 our Board of Directors extended the termination date of the repurchase program to December 31, 2017, however the repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time, and does not obligate us to acquire any particular amount of our shares. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we purchased 475,600 and 145,000 shares of Solitario common stock, respectively, for an aggregate purchase price of $248,000 and $67,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2016, we have purchased a total of 620,600 shares of Solitario common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $315,000 under the share repurchase program since its inception.

18

Item 6.Selected Financial Data

The following table summarizes the consolidated statements of operations and balance sheet data for our business since January 1, 2012. This data has been derived from our audited consolidated statements of operations for each of the five years ended December 31, 2016 and our audited consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2012. You should read this information in conjunction with Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and Solitario's historical consolidated financial statements and notes included in Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." The information set forth below is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Balance sheet data: As of December 31,
(in thousands) 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Total current assets $16,797  $17,990  $3,217  $3,784  $7,936 
Total assets $17,614  $18,054  $19,040  $19,500  $23,483 
Working capital (deficit)(1) $16,671  $17,811  $(1,987) $2,531  $4,245 
Long-term debt $—    $—    $—    $3,144  $2,437 
Shareholders' equity $17,488  $17,875  $6,781  $7,963  $9,217 
Statement of operations data: Year ended December 31,
(in thousands, except per share amounts) 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Property and joint venture revenue $—    $—    $200  $300  $300 
Net (loss) income $(1,710) $8,872  $(1,833) $(2,052) $(3,297)
Per share information:                    
  Basic and diluted                    
    Net (loss) income $(0.04) $0.23  $(0.05) $(0.06) $(0.10)

(1) Working capital consists of current assets less current liabilities.

19

Item 7.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the information contained in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." Our financial condition and results of operations are not necessarily indicative of what may be expected in future years.

(a). Business Overview and Summary

We are an exploration stage company at December 31, 2016 under Industry Guide 7, as issued by the SEC. We were incorporated in the state of Colorado on November 15, 1984 as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Crown Resources Corporation ("Crown"). In July 1994, we became a publicly traded company on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the "TSX") through our initial public offering. We have been actively involved in mineral exploration since 1993. Our primary business is to acquire exploration mineral properties or royalties and/or discover economic deposits on our mineral properties and advance these deposits, either on our own or through joint ventures, up to the development stage (development activities include, among other things, completion of a feasibility study for the identification of proven and probable reserves, as well as permitting and preparing a deposit for mining). At that point, or sometime prior to that point, we would likely attempt to sell a given mineral property, pursue its development either on our own, or through a joint venture with a partner that has expertise in mining operations, or obtain a royalty from a third party that continues to advance the property. In addition to focusing on our current assets and the evaluation of mineral properties for acquisition or purchase of royalty interests, we also evaluate potential strategic corporate transactions for the potential acquisition of new precious and base metal properties and assets with exploration potential or business combinations we determine to be favorable to Solitario.

Our geographic focus for the evaluation of potential mineral property assets is in North and South America, however we have conducted property evaluations for potential acquisition in in other parts of the world. Our exploration properties may be developed in the future by us or through a joint venture, although we have never developed a mineral property. At December 31, 2016, we had three exploration properties in Peru, and one royalty property in each of Peru, Brazil, the United States and Mexico. We are conducting limited exploration activities in those countries either on our own or through joint ventures operated by our partners.

In analyzing our activities, the most significant aspect relates to results of our exploration and potential development activities and those of our joint venture partners on a property-by-property basis. When our exploration or development activities, including drilling, sampling and geologic testing, indicate a project may not be economic or contain sufficient geologic or economic potential we may impair or completely write-off the property. Another significant factor in the success or failure of our activities is the price of commodities. For example, when the price of gold is down, the value of gold-bearing mineral properties decreases; however, when the price of gold is up it may become more difficult and expensive to locate and acquire new gold-bearing mineral properties with potential to have economic deposits.

The potential sale, joint venture or development of our mineral properties will occur, if at all, on an infrequent basis. We have recorded revenues and met our need for capital in the past through (i) the sale of properties; (ii) joint venture payments, including delay rental payments discussed above; (iii) a royalty sale on our former Mt. Hamilton property during 2012; (iv) the sale of our shares of Kinross common stock; (v) borrowing against the Facility Agreement; (vi) short-term margin borrowing; and (vii) issuance of common stock. In 2015 we recorded a gain on the sale on the Transaction (discussed below) of $12,309,000. During June 2012, we sold a royalty interest in our Mt. Hamilton project to Sandstorm Gold Ltd. (“Sandstorm”) for $10,000,000. Previous to the Transaction, our last significant cash proceeds were recorded in 2000 upon the sale of our former Yanacocha property for $6,000,000.  Proceeds from the sale or joint venture of properties, although significant when they occur, have not been a consistent annual source of cash and would occur in the future, if at all, on an infrequent basis. We have reduced our exposure to the costs of our exploration activities in the past through the use of joint ventures. Although we anticipate the use of joint venture funding for some of our exploration activities will continue for the foreseeable future, we can provide no assurance that these or other sources of capital will be available in sufficient amounts to meet our needs, if at all.

(b). Sale of Mt. Hamilton LLC

On August 25, 2015, we, along with DHI, sold our combined interests in the Mt. Hamilton gold project to Waterton, for total cash proceeds of US$30 million (as defined above, the “Transaction”) pursuant to the Agreement. We sold our 80% interest in MH-LLC, a limited liability company which held 100% of the Mt. Hamilton project assets, and DHI sold its 20% interest in MH-LLC. We received gross cash proceeds of US$24 million as a result of the Transaction. Our costs and fees related to the Transaction, including broker fees and professional service fees, were $439,000. The Transaction was structured

as the sale of Solitario’s and DHI’s combined membership interests in MH-LLC. Concurrent with the closing of the Transaction, we paid $5,000,000 plus $7,000 of interest and fees to fully repay the funds we had borrowed pursuant to the Facility Agreement with RMBAH and RMBR whereby we had borrowed $5,000,000 from RMBAH (as defined above, the “RMB Loan”). 

20

Duringfiscal year ended December 31, 2015, virtually all of the costs incurred by MH-LLC were directly related to the development of the Mt. Hamilton project, which were capitalized to mineral property. Accordingly, separate presentation of discontinued operations would not have resulted in any material change to the results presented in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2015.

The sale of MH-LLC in 2015 is shown as gain on sale of discontinued operations as follows:

(in thousands) Year ended December 31,
  2015
Proceeds from sale of MH-LLC $24,000 
Net assets and liabilities disposed of  9,998 
Non-controlling interest  256 
Expenses of sale of MH-LLC  439 
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, before tax  13,307 
Income tax expense  998 
Gain on sale of discontinued operations $12,309 

Income taxes have been allocated between discontinued operations and continuing operations in accordance with ASC No. 740 “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”).

(c). Results of Operations

Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2016 to the year ended December 31, 2015

We had a net loss of $1,710,000 or $0.04 per basic and diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to net income of $8,872,000 or $0.23 per basic and diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2015. As explained in more detail below, the primary reason for change to net loss during 2016 compared to 2015 was the gain on sale from the Transaction during 2015. However, our loss from continuing operations decreased to $1,710,000 in 2016 compared to the net loss from continuing operations of $3,440,000 during 2015. Factors contributing to the decrease in loss from continuing operations included (i) a gain on the sale of marketable equity securities during 2016 of $40,000 compared to a loss on the sale of marketable equity securities of $969,000 during 2015; (ii) an increase in gain on derivative instruments to $672,000 during 2016 compared to gain on derivative instruments of $84,000 during 2015 (iii) a decrease in depreciation and amortization expense to $5,000 during 2016 compared to depreciation and amortization expense of $11,000 during 2015; (iv) an increase in interest and dividend income during 2016 to $44,000 compared to interest and dividend income of $12,000 during 2015; and (v) a deferred income tax credit of $353,000 during 2016 compared to an income tax expense of $560,000 during 2015. Partially offsetting these decreases in net loss from operations were (i) an increase in exploration expense to $628,000 during 2016 compared to exploration expense of $89,000 during 2015; (ii) an increase in general and administrative expense of $2,163,000 during 2016 compared to general and administrative expense of $1,965,000 during 2015; (iii) a loss on sale of assets and property abandonment of $27,000 during 2016 compared to a gain on sale of assets of $7,000 during 2015; and (iv) a gain on warrant liability of $4,000 during 2016 compared to a gain on warrant liability of $51,000 during 2015. Each of these items is discussed in greater detail below.

Our primary activities during 2016 and 2015 subsequent to the Transaction, has been the evaluation of mineral properties and other junior mining companies for possible acquisition and or merger, with an increase in related reconnaissance exploration activities and expense. Prior to the Transaction our focus had been on the engineering and permitting activities to advance the Mt. Hamilton property toward future production, and to a lesser extent the monitoring of the exploration and development activities of our joint venture partners. Up until the closing of the Transaction, during 2015 we continued our development efforts related to our Mt. Hamilton project capitalizing $1,382,000 in mineral property costs including $699,000 in direct development costs, property payments of $190,000 and capitalization of interest costs of $493,000. There were no such capitalization of development costs during 2016, and our exploration efforts and expenditures were less during 2015 as we focused on the Transaction. We decided to close our Mexico exploration office during 2016; however this reduction in exploration was more than offset by the exploration and evaluation efforts of our staff and contract geologists during 2016. We did no drilling on any of our exploration projects in South America or Mexico during 2016 or 2015. Our 2017 exploration and development expenditure budget is approximately $813,000, which is expected to be directed toward the evaluation and potential acquisition of new mineral exploration properties. We cannot predict with certainty that we will acquire new mineral exploration properties during 2017; however, we will continue our reduced early-stage exploration activities. Our exploration activities may be modified, as necessary for changes in the acquisition of new properties, joint venture funding, commodity prices and deployment of our capital.

21

Exploration expense (in thousands) by property consisted of the following:

Property Name 2016 2015
La Promesa $81  $8 
Bongará  2   13 
Pachuca  —     8 
Norcan  —     2 
Reconnaissance exploration activity  545   58 
  Total exploration expense $628  $89 

We believe a discussion of our general and administrative costs should be viewed without the non-cash stock option compensation expense which is discussed below. Excluding these costs, general and administrative costs were $1,193,000 during 2016 compared to $1,399,000 during 2015. We reduced salary and benefits expense to $708,000 during 2016 compared to $789,000 during 2015 as a result of salary reductions. In addition, (i) legal and accounting costs were reduced to $126,000 during 2016 compared to $183,000 during 2015 as a result of increased legal work during 2015 associated with the Transaction; (ii) travel and investor relation costs were reduced to $177,000 during 2016 compared to $207,000 during 2015 as a result of ongoing cost reductions and reduced activities in travel and investor relations costs during 2016 and (iii) other costs related to office, insurance and miscellaneous costs were reduced to $180,000 during 2016 compared to $193,000 during 2015 primarily due to cost reductions and our focus on evaluation of exploration properties and potential corporate transactions during 2016. We anticipate general and administrative costs for 2017 will be comparable to the costs incurred during 2016, however this amount may vary significantly during 2017 depending on the outcome of our property evaluations and or our entry into any possible corporate transaction, which cannot be predicted at this time. We have forecast 2017 general and administrative costs to be approximately $1,107,000, excluding non-cash stock option compensation expense.

We account for our employee stock options under the provisions of ASC 718. We recognize stock option compensation expense on the date of grant for 25% of the grant date fair value, and subsequently, based upon a straight line amortization of the grant date fair value of each of its outstanding options. During the year ended December 31, 2016, we recorded $970,000 of non-cash stock option expense for the amortization of grant date fair value with a credit to additional paid-in-capital compared to $566,000 of non-cash stock option compensation expense during 2015. On August 24, 2016, holders of option awards voluntarily cancelled awards for 390,000 options from our 2006 Plan and 1,699,000 options from our 2013 Plan to allow Solitario to have additional financial flexibility. No consideration was given or received by the holders of the options to cancel the awards. The cancellation of the awards and the grant of 1,699,000 options from our 2013 Plan on June 22, 2016 and the related 25% expense of the grant date fair value on that date, contributed to the increase in the non-cash stock option compensation during 2016 compared to 2015. As of December 31, 2016 we have no outstanding options or stock awards from our 2013 Plan or 2016 Plan. See Note 9, “Employee Stock Compensation Plans,” to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for an analysis of the changes in the fair value of our outstanding stock options and the components that are used to determine the fair value.

During 2016 we sold 3,000 shares of Kinross common stock for proceeds of $10,000 and recorded a gain on sale of $8,000 and we also sold 250,000 shares of International Lithium Corp marketable equity securities for proceeds of $45,000 and recorded a gain of $32,000. These combined 2016 sales proceeds of $55,000 and recorded 2016 gain on sale of $40,000 compared to the sale of 380,000 shares of Kinross common stock during 2015 for proceeds of $809,000 and recorded a gain on sale of Kinross of $541,000. The sale of Kinross stock during 2015 was a major source of operating funds, which was not necessary during 2016 after the Transaction. Prior to the Transaction, Solitario entered into an agreement with Ely and transferred 15,732,274 shares of Ely common stock we held, in exchange for cancellation of certain payment obligations related to MH-LLC, and in consideration for consent to extend the RMB Loan from August 21, 2015 to September 30, 2015 (the “Ely Consent”). Solitario recorded a loss on sale of marketable equity securities of $1,510,000 on the transfer of the Ely common stock during 2015. During 2016, we made acquired an investment in Vendetta Mining Corp., a publicly traded company traded on the TSX venture exchange (“Vendetta”). See Note 3, “Marketable Equity Securities” to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for a discussion of our investments in marketable equity securities. We may sell some of our marketable equity securities from time to time during 2017; however we do not expect to sell all of our holdings of marketable equity securities during 2017. Any proceeds we may receive from sales of marketable equity securities during 2017 will be dependent on the quoted market price of the securities sold on the date of sale and may be at prices below the fair value at December 31, 2016. See Liquidity and Capital Resources below.2016:

 2213 

 

 

Name(1) Fees earned or paid in cash
($)
 Stock Awards
($)
 Option Awards
(2)(3)
($)
 Non-equity incentive plan compensation Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
 All
Other
Compensation
($)
 Total
($)
Mr. Labadie, Chairman (4)  14,000   —     82,513   —     —     —     96,513 
Mr. Hainey (5)  11,000   —     72,512   —     —     —     83,512 
Mr. Harris (6)  9,000   —     72,512   —     —     —     81,512 
Mr. Jones (7)  12,000   —     77,512   —     —     —     89,512 
Mr. Labate (8)  —     —     —     —     —     —     —   
(1)Mr. Herald received a salary and other compensation for his services as an officer of Solitario during the year ended December 31, 2016, which are shown below under the “Summary Compensation Table”.
(2)The 2016 options were granted from the 2013Plan on July 28, 2016, had a five-year term and vest 25% on grant date and 25% on the next three anniversary dates. The assumptions used in determining our 2016 grant date fair value are based upon a Black-Scholes model using a five year term, historical volatility of 63%, and a risk-free interest rate of 0.9%. Mr. Harris and Mr. Hainey each received 145,000 options, Mr. Labadie received 165,000 options and Mr. Jones received 155,000 options. All options were granted with an exercise price of $0.72 per share being the closing share price as quoted on the NYSE MKT on July 28, 2016, the date of grant. On August 24, 2016, the holders of options to acquire Solitario common stock voluntarily surrendered for cancellation all options previously granted to such persons pursuant to the 2013 Plan. Solitario cancelled the options upon surrender. As a result, there are no outstanding options under the 2013 Plan as of December 31, 2016.
(3)All options granted to directors during 2016, were subsequently cancelled, No options are outstanding at December 31, 2016.
(4)Mr. Labadie is also Chairman of the Compensation Committee and has no stock options outstanding at December 31, 2016.
(5)Mr. Hainey was the Audit Committee Chairman and resigned from the Board effective December 31, 2016 and has no stock options outstanding at December 31, 2016.
(6)Mr. Harris is Chairman of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and has no stock options outstanding at December 31, 2016.
(7)Mr. Jones was the Vice Chairman of the Board and resigned from the Board on November 11, 2016 and has no stock options outstanding at December 31, 2016.
(8)Mr. Labate joined the Board on December 22, 2016, was appointed Audit Committee Chairman and received no stock options or director fees during the year ended December 31, 2016.

During 2016 we recorded a gain

Compensation Committee

On June 27, 2006, the Board approved the charter for and formed the Compensation Committee. A current copy of the Compensation Committee charter is available on derivative instrumentsthe Company website at www.solitarioxr.com. Mr. Labadie, Mr. Labate and Mr. Harris are the members of $672,000 comparedthe Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee met three times during 2016.

The primary purposes of the Compensation Committee are to a gain on derivative instruments(a) review from time to time and approve the overall management evaluation and compensation policies of $84,000 during 2015. The gains during 2016 were related to our investment in Vendetta Warrants (defined below), which were purchased on May 2, 2016, as part of our strategic investment in Vendetta, where we acquired 7,240,000 units for Cdn$0.05 per unit, with each unit consisting of one share of Vendetta common stockSolitario; (b) review and one Vendetta Warrant. Each Vendetta warrant entitles Solitario the right to acquire one share of Vendetta common stock at a price of Cdn$0.10 per share for a period of two years. (the “Vendetta Warrants”) We recorded a gain on derivative instruments of $629,000 relatedapprove goals and objectives relevant to the Vendetta Warrants during 2016,compensation of the executive officers, including the chief executive officer, of Solitario and there was no similar item during 2015.evaluate the performance of Solitario's executive officers; (c) set the compensation of the executive officers of Solitario, in light of the Compensation Committee's review; (d) review, approve and periodically evaluate Solitario's compensation and other benefit plans, including incentive compensation and equity-based plans and programs for non-employee directors, executive officers and senior management, and make recommendations as necessary; (e) review and approve any amendments and modifications to any such plan or program requiring approval of the Board, subject to applicable regulatory and shareholder approval requirements; (f) review and approve the granting of options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights and other equity-based grants to Solitario's non-employee directors, executive officers and senior management consistent with the Company’s incentive compensation plans and programs and compensation and retention strategy, subject to ratification by the Board; (g) review and approve plans of the Company for management development and senior managerial succession; (h) oversee compliance with the applicable compensation reporting requirements of the SEC and (i) conduct an annual performance self-evaluation of the Compensation Committee and prepare an annual report thereon to the Board. The remaining changeCompensation Committee has not engaged compensation consultants but has the authority to do so under the Compensation Committee charter. Further, the Compensation Committee may form, and delegate authority to, subcommittees when appropriate.The processes and procedures used for the consideration and determination of executive compensation are described above under "Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

The scope and authority of the Compensation Committee, including the role of executive officers and compensation consultants in increasedetermining or recommending the amount and form of compensation and the ability of the Compensation Committee to delegate authority, are more fully described in the gain on derivative instruments was related to the sale of Kinross calls during 2016 and 2015. We have sold covered calls on a limited portion of our Kinross common stock that we intend to sell within one year, to enhance our return on Kinross common stock in exchange for potential upside in those covered Kinross shares. We intend to continue to sell covered Kinross call options during 2017. See Note 6, “Derivative Instruments,” to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” for an analysis of the changes in our derivative instruments, and the components that are used to determine the fair value of our derivative instruments.Compensation Committee charter.

We recorded $5,000 of depreciation and amortization during 2016 compared to $18,000 of depreciation and amortization during 2015, of which we capitalized $7,000 to mineral property in connection with the development of Mt. Hamilton. The decrease is primarily as a result of certain equipment being fully amortized during 2015 and 2016 as well as the elimination of Mt. Hamilton depreciation after the Transaction. We amortize these assets over a three-year period. We anticipate our 2017 depreciation and amortization costs will similar to the 2016 amount.

We had no interest cost during 2016 compared to interest cost of $493,000 during 2016, all of which was capitalized to Mt. Hamilton prior to the transaction. The 2015 interest cost included (i) $228,000 paid in cash on the RMB Loan, (ii) $126,000 for the amortization of our deferred offering costs on the RMB Loan and (iii) $139,000 of interest costs associated with the amortization of the discount associated with the RMB Warrants issued in connection with the RMB Loan. As discussed above, we capitalized all of our interest costs during 2015 to mineral property associated with the development of Mt. Hamilton. See Note 2, “Mineral Properties” to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” As a result of the Transaction we do not anticipate incurring any interest cost in 2017.

We recorded interest and dividend income of $44,000 during 2016 compared to interest and dividend income of $12,000 during 2015. The increase during 2016 was related to the investment of the net proceeds from the Transaction in short-term certificates of deposit and United States Treasury notes since the date of the Transaction. We anticipate our interest income will decrease in 2017 as a result of the use of our short-term investments and our cash balances for the exploration, evaluation and or acquisition of mineral properties discussed above. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources,” below, for further discussion of our cash and cash equivalent balances.

During 2016 we recorded deferred tax expense of $353,000 to other comprehensive income related to the net increase in the unrealized value of our marketable equity securities, with a corresponding credit to income tax expense in the statement of operations. See Note 3, “Marketable Equity Securities” to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. During 2015 we recorded $560,000 of income tax expense resulting primarily from: (a) $1,558,000 of tax expense related to the clearing of a disproportionate tax effect lodged in other comprehensive income; and (b) allocation of $998,000 of tax benefit related to current year losses. The disproportionate tax effect in other comprehensive income was cleared due to Solitario's disposition of substantially all of the associated available for sale securities. See Note 5, “Income Taxes” to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for additional discussion of our income tax valuation allowance, deferred tax assets and our net operating losses for 2016 and 2015. We continue to provide a valuation allowance for our foreign net operating losses, which are primarily related to our exploration activities in Peru. We anticipate we will continue to provide a valuation allowance for these foreign net operating losses until we are in a net tax liability position with regards to those countries where we operate or until it is more likely than not that we will be able to realize those net operating losses in the future.

We regularly perform evaluations of our mineral property assets to assess the recoverability of our investments in these assets. All long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances change which indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable utilizing guidelines based upon future net cash flows from the asset as well as our estimates of the geologic potential of early stage mineral property and its related value for future sale, joint venture or development by us or others. During 2016, we closed our exploration office in Mexico. We retained a 1% royalty on both the Norcan and Aconchi exploration projects in Mexico Solitario recorded a mineral property write-down of $10,000 related to the Norcan and Aconchi properties during 2016. During 2016, we abandoned our interest in its Canta Colorado property in Peru and recorded a mineral property write-down expense of $3,000 related to Canta Colorado. In addition, we recorded a loss

on other assets in Mexico of $14,000 related to the exit from its exploration activities in Mexico during 2016. We had no mineral property impairments during 2015.

 2314 

 

(d). LiquidityCompensation Committee Interlocks and Capital Resources

CashInsider Participation

AsMr. Labadie, Mr. Labate and Mr. Harris are the members of December 31, 2016 we have $119,000 in cash. We intend to utilize a portion of this cash and a portion of our Short-term investments, discussed below, in our exploration activities and the potential acquisition of mineral properties and other assets over the next several years. We may also use a portion of these assets to repurchase shares of our common stock, pursuant to the terms of a stock buy-back program discussed below.

Short-term Investments

As of December 31, 2016, we have $7,510,000 of our current assets in United States Treasury securities (“USTS”) with maturities of 15 days to one year. The USTS are recorded at their fair value, based upon quoted market prices. The USTS are highly liquid and may be sold in their entirety at any time at their quoted market priceCompensation Committee and are classified as a current asset. We anticipate we will roll over that portion of our USTS not used for operating costs or mineral property acquisitions as they mature during 2017.

As of December 31, 2016 we have $7,499,000 in separate bank certificates of deposit (“CDs”) each with a maximum value of $250,000, and each of which are covered by Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance to the full face value of the CDs. At December 31, 2016, the CDs have maturities of between 20 days and eighteen months. The CDs are recorded at their fair value, based upon quoted market prices. The CDs are highly liquid and may be sold in their entirety at any time at their quoted market price and are classified as a current asset. We anticipate we will roll over that portion of our CDs not used for operating costs or mineral property acquisitions as they mature during 2017.

Marketable Equity Securities

Our marketable equity securities are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value, which is based upon market quotes of the underlying securities. We owned 100,000 shares of Kinross common stock at December 31, 2016. The Kinross shares are recorded at their fair value of $311,000 at December 31, 2016. On May 2, 2016 we purchased 7,240,000 units of Vendetta for an aggregate purchase price of $289,000. Each unit consists of one share of Vendetta common stock and one Vendetta Warrant for the purchase of one share of Vendetta common stock at Cdn$0.10 per share for a period of two years. As of December 31, 2016 we have recorded our investment in the common shares of Vendetta at their fair market value of $1,022,000 based upon quoted market prices. In addition we own other marketable equity securities with a fair value of $6,000 as of December 31, 2016 based upon quoted market prices. Changes in the fair value of marketable equity securities are recorded as gains and losses in other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity.

Working Capital

We had working capital of $16,671,000 at December 31, 2016 compared to working capital of $17,811,000 as of December 31, 2015. Our working capital at December 31, 2016 consists primarily of our cash and cash equivalents, our investment in USTS and CDs, discussed above, and our marketable equity securities of $1,339,000, less our accounts payable of $124,000 and the fair value of our Kinross calls, discussed above, of $4,000. As of December 31, 2016, our cash balances along with our short-term investments and marketable equity securities are adequate to fund our expected expenditures over the next year.

The nature of the mineral exploration business requires significant sources of capital to fund exploration, development and operation of mining projects. We expect we will need additional capital if we decide to develop or operate any of our current exploration projects or any projects or assets we may acquire. We anticipate we would finance any such development through the use of our cash reserves, short-term investments, joint ventures, issuance of debt or equity, or the sale of other exploration projects or assets.

Stock-Based Compensation Plans

During 2016, the holders of options to acquire our common stock voluntarily surrendered for cancellation all options previously granted to such persons pursuant to the 2013 Plan and the 2006 Plan. Solitario cancelled the options upon surrender. As of June 26, 2016, the 2006 Plan has terminated, and“independent” in accordance with the termsdefinition of independence set forth in the NYSE-MKT Company Guide. No member of the 2006 Plan, no additional awards mayCompensation Committee is currently, or has been an officer or employee of Solitario for the last three years or had a relationship with Solitario required to be madedisclosed pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed, evaluated and discussed the 2006 Plan. As(i) allocation of December 31,executive compensation, including the allocation of compensation between salary paid in cash and deferred compensation in the form of stock option grants and awards; (ii) goals and objectives of our executive compensation including the need to be competitive with peer companies to retain and attract the best available executive talent; (iii) existing elements of executive compensation including salary, bonus and stock options, and (iv) performance of our existing executives, including our CEO against general targets and goals including budgets, exploration activities and success, the performance of our stock and other measures. Neither the Compensation Committee nor management has engaged any compensation consultants in determining or recommending the amount or form of executive or director compensation in the last year. During 2016, there are no outstanding options under either the 2006 Plan orCompany hired an independent consultant to review the 2013 Plan. See Note 9, “Employee Stock Compensation Plans,” above for a discussionCompany’s administration of its equity compensation plans, including the related internal controls over its compensation plan practices as well as to provide recommendations on best practices in administering its equity compensation plans. The Company reviewed and implemented the recommendations of the activity inindependent consultant and these are included and incorporated into the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, above. The Compensation Committee has reviewed recommendations prepared by our 2013 PlanCEO for levels of compensation for Mr. Hunt, our Chief Operating Officer and Mr. Maronick, our 2006 Plan during 2016. We do not anticipate that stock option exercises will be a sourceChief Financial Officer. The Compensation Committee has reviewedand discussed with management the Company's Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of cash during 2017.

24

Share Repurchase Program

On October 28, 2015, ourthis Annual Report. Based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program that authorized us to purchase up to two million shares of our outstanding common stock through December 31, 2016. During 2016, our Board of Directors extended the term of the share repurchase program until December 31, 2017. All shares purchased have been cancelledCompensation Discussion and reduced the number of shares of outstanding common stock. The amount and timing of any shares purchased has been and willAnalysis be determined by our management and the purchases will be effectedincluded in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions based upon market conditions and other factors, including price, regulatory requirements and capital availability and in compliance with applicable state and federal securities laws. Purchases may also be made in accordance with Rule 10b-18 of the Exchange Act. The repurchase program does not require the purchase of any minimum number of shares of common stock by the Company, and may be suspended, modified or discontinued at any time without prior notice. No purchases will be made outside of the United States, including on the Toronto Stock Exchange. Payment for shares of common stock repurchased under the program will be funded using the Company’s working capital. As of December 31, 2016, since the inception of the share repurchase program, we have purchased a total of 620,600 shares for an aggregate purchase price of $315,000 and these shares are no longer included in our issued and outstanding shares. We anticipate we will continue to purchase a limited number of shares under the share repurchase plan as during 2017 as determined by management.

Off-balance sheet arrangements

As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, we have no off-balance sheet arrangements.

(e). Cash Flows

Net cash used in operations during the year ended December 31, 2016 increased to $1,835,000 compared to $1,723,000 for 2015 primarily as a result of cash used in operations related to increased exploration expense during 2016 for the evaluation of potential acquisitions, discussed above under “Results of Operations. Partially offsetting this increased use of cash in operations was: (i) the use of cash in discontinued operations of $190,000 prior to the date of the Transaction during 2015 with no comparable item during 2016, and (ii) a decrease in the non-stock compensation general and administrative costs to $1,193,000 during 2016 compared to non-stock compensation general and administrative costs of $1,397,000 during 2015 as discussed in further detail above under “Results of Operations.”

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities decreased to a use of cash of $15,516,000 during 2016 compared to an increase in cash from investing activities of $23,833,000 during 2015. The primary reason for the cash provided during 2015 was as a result of the gross proceeds of $24,000,000 received in the Transaction. The primary use of cash during 2016 was the net purchases of CD and USTS short-term investments of $15,572,000 discussed above in “Liquidity and Capital Resources.” In addition we (i) used $40,000 of cash for the purchase of a royalty on certain non-producing mineral leases in Montana during 2016; (ii) received $56,000 in proceeds from the sale of marketable equity securities during 2016 compared to proceeds of $809,000 during 2015, prior to the Transaction, when the sale of our Kinross common stock was a major source of funding of our operations; and (iii) received $45,000 during 2016 from the sale of derivative instruments related to Kinross calls compared to $84,000 from the sale of Kinross calls during 2015. The Transaction is more fully discussed above under “Sale of Mt. Hamilton.”

Net cash used in financing activities was $248,000 during 2016 compared to cash used in financing activities of $4,879,000 during 2015. The primary reason for the change in cash provided from financing activities in 2015 was the repayment of the $5,000,000 RMB Loan, discussed above.

(f). Development Activities, Exploration Activities, Environmental Compliance and Contractual Obligations

Development Activities

With the completion of the Transaction we no longer have any ongoing development activities.

25

Exploration Activities

A historically significant part of our business involves the review of potential property acquisitions and continuing review and analysis of properties in which we have an interest, to determine the exploration and development potential of the properties. In analyzing expected levels of expenditures for work commitments and property payments, our obligations to make such payments fluctuate greatly depending on whether, among other things, we make a decision to sell a property interest, convey a property interest to a joint venture, or allow our interest in a property to lapse by not making the work commitment or payment required. In acquiring many of our interests in mining claims and leases, we have entered into

agreements, which generally may be canceled at our option. We are often required to make minimum rental and option payments in order to maintain our interest in certain claims and leases. Our net 2016 mineral and surface property rental and option payments, included in exploration expense, were $19,000. Our 2017 total exploration property rentals and option payments for properties we own or operate are estimated to be approximately $271,000. Assuming that our joint ventures continue in their current status and that we do not appreciably change our property positions on existing properties, we estimate that our joint venture partners will pay on our behalf, or reimburse us approximately $263,000 of these annual payments. These obligations are detailed below under “Contractual Obligations.” In addition, we may be required to make further payments in the future if we elect to exercise our options under those agreements or if we enter into new agreements.

Environmental Compliance

We are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations in the countries where we operate. We are required to obtain permits in advance of initiating certain of our exploration activities, to monitor and report on certain activities to appropriate authorities, and to perform remediation of environmental disturbance as a result of certain of our activities. Historically, the nature of our activities of review, acquisition and exploration of properties prior to the establishment of reserves, which may include mapping, sampling, geochemistry and geophysical studies, as well as some limited exploration drilling, has not resulted in significant environmental impacts in the past. We have historically carried on our required environmental remediation expenditures and activities, if any, concurrently with our exploration activities and expenditures. The expenditures to comply with our environmental obligations are included in our exploration expenditures in the statement of operations and have not been material to our capital or exploration expenditures, and have not had a material effect on our financial position. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we have not capitalized any costs related to environmental control facilities. We do not anticipate our exploration activities will result in any material new or additional environmental expenditures or liabilities in the near future.

Contractual Obligations

The following table provides an analysis of our contractual obligations:

(in thousands)      As of December 31, 2016
      Payments due by period
     Total     Less than 1 year     1–3 years     4–5 years     More than
     5 years
Operating Lease Obligations (1)$   81 $   38 $43 $   -  $   -  
Mineral property option and lease payments$   8 $   8 $  -  $   -  $   -  
(1)Lease obligation on our Wheat Ridge Colorado office.

(g). Exploration Joint Ventures, Royalty and Other Properties

The following discussion relates to an analysis of our anticipated property exploration plans as of December 31, 2016. Please also see Note 2, “Mineral Properties,” to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” and our discussion of our properties under Item 2, “Properties” of thisCompany's Annual Report on Form 10-K for a more complete discussion of all of our mineral properties.

Bongará

The Bongará project is an advanced-stage high-grade zinc project in Peru. Based on extensive exploration and development work conducted to date, we believe the property has excellent potential to be developed into a mine over the next several years. In August 2006 we signed a Letter Agreement with Votorantim, granting Votorantim the right to earn up to a 70% interest in the project by meeting certain spending and development milestones. During 2015 Votorantim announced the transfer of the Bongará project to Milpo, an 80%-owned affiliate of Votorantim. Milpo has assumed all of the development responsibilities of Votorantim. The Bongará project hosts the Florida Canyon zinc deposit, where high-grade zinc mineralization has been encountered in drill holes over an area approximately 2.5 kilometers by 1.3 kilometers in dimension.

In early 2017, we engaged SRK to complete a PEA of the Florida Canyon deposit. The PEA will be based on Milpo’s recent geochemical/metallurgical work and other previous work, including metallurgical, resource estimation and engineering. The focus of the study will be to characterize the economic potential of the sulfide component of the mineralization. The PEA is expected to be completed by the end of the second-quarter 2017. Milpo is funding and managing all other conducted on the project.

26

Royalty Properties

The 61,000-hectare Yanacocha royalty property is located in northern Peru immediately north of Newmont Mining-Buenaventura's Minera Yanacocha Mine, one of the largest gold mines in South America. We acquired the property in 1993 and sold it to Newmont in 2000 for $6.0 million and we retained a sliding scale net smelter return royalty on the property that varies from two to five percent, depending on the price of gold. In addition, we hold royalties on the Pedra Branca property in Brazil, the Norcan and Aconchi properties in Mexico and certain non-producing mineral leases in Montana, acquired from Atna Resources, Inc. We consider all of these royalty properties to be an early-stage exploration property, and although we believe each may have good potential to host economic mineralization, we will not receive any royalties from any of these properties until such time as their owners develops and places into operation a mine on the properties covered by our royalty. Accordingly, we cannot predict revenue from our royalties in the near future, if ever.

Other Properties

We have budgeted 2017 exploration expenditures of $813,000 for exploration and evaluation of potential new acquisitions of properties primarily in North and South America, but potentially in other regions of the world. We expect to carry on limited exploration activities during 2017 by utilizing our own employees and contract geologists.

(h). Discontinued Projects

During 2016, we closed our exploration office in Mexico. We sold our Norcan and Aconchi exploration projects in Mexico for a retained a 1% royalty on both the Norcan and Aconchi properties. Solitario recorded a mineral property write-down of $10,000 related to the Norcan and Aconchi properties during 2016. During 2016, we abandoned our interest in its Canta Colorado property in Peru and recorded a mineral property write-down expense of $3,000 related to Canta Colorado. In addition, we recorded a loss on other assets in Mexico of $14,000 related to the exit from its exploration activities in Mexico during 2016. We had no mineral property impairments during 2015.

(i). Significant Accounting Policies

See Note 1, “Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for a discussion of our significant accounting policies.

(j). Related Party Transactions

None

(k). Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 1, “Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements.

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Smaller reporting companies are not required to provide the information required by this item.

27

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Page
Consolidated Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm29
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 201530
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 201531
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31,
2016 and 2015
32
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the years ended December 31, 2016 and
2015
33
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 201534
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements35

28

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders

Solitario Exploration & Royalty Corp.

Wheat Ridge, Colorado

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Solitario Exploration & Royalty Corp. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Solitario Exploration & Royalty Corp. as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

EKS&H LLLP

March 10, 2017

Denver, Colorado

SOLITARIO EXPLORATION & ROYALTY CORP.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share amounts) December 31, December 31,
  2016 2015
Assets        
Current assets:        
  Cash and cash equivalents $119  $17,718 
  Short-term investments, at fair value  15,250   —   
  Investments in marketable equity securities, at fair value  1,339   202 
  Prepaid expenses and other  89   70 
    Total current assets  16,797   17,990 
         
Mineral properties  46   19 
Other assets  771   45 
      Total assets $17,614  $18,054 
         
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity        
Current liabilities:        
  Accounts payable $124  $175 
  Other  2   4 
    Total current liabilities  126   179 
         
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 2 and 9)        
         
Shareholders’ equity:        
Solitario shareholders’ equity        
  Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 10,000,000 shares (none     issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 and 2015)  —     —   
  Common stock, $0.01 par value, authorized, 100,000,000 shares
    (38,693,589 and 39,169,189 , respectively, shares issued and      outstanding  at December 31, 2016 and 2015)
  387   392 
  Additional paid-in capital  55,790   55,063 
  Accumulated deficit  (39,401)  (37,691)
  Accumulated other comprehensive income  712   111 
    Total shareholders' equity  17,488   17,875 
      Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $17,614  $18,054 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

29

SOLITARIO EXPLORATION & ROYALTY CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

(in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except per share amounts) For the year ended December 31,
  2016 2015
     
Costs, expenses and other        
  Exploration expense  628   89 
  Depreciation and amortization  5   11 
  General and administrative  2,163   1,965 
  Gain on derivative instruments  (672)  (84)
  Property abandonment and impairment  13   —   
  Loss (gain) on sale of assets  14   (7)
  Interest expense and dividend income (net)  (44)  (12)
Total costs, expenses and other  2,107   1,962 
Other (expense) income        
  Gain (loss) on sale of marketable equity securities  40   (969)
  Gain on warrant liability  4   51 
Total other income (expense)  44   (918)
Loss before income tax  (2,063)  (2,880)
  Income tax benefit (expense)  353   (560)
Loss from continuing operations  (1,710)  (3,440)
  Gain on sale of discontinued operations  —     12,309 
Net income (loss)  (1,710)  8,869 
  Loss attributable to noncontrolling interest  —     3 
Net income (loss) attributable to Solitario shareholders $(1,710) $8,872 
Income (loss) per common share attributable to Solitario        
  shareholders basic and diluted        
     Continuing operations $(0.04) $(0.09)
     Discontinued operations  —     0.31 
     Net income (loss) $(0.04) $0.23 
Weighted average shares outstanding        
  Basic and diluted  38,906   39,287 
         

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

30

SOLITARIO EXPLORATION & ROYALTY CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

(in thousands of U.S. Dollars) For the year ended December 31,
  2016 2015
Net income (loss) for the period, before other comprehensive loss $(1,710) $8,869 
Other comprehensive income :        
  Unrealized gain on marketable equity securities, net of deferred taxes  601   1,231 
Comprehensive income (loss)  (1,109)  10,100 
  Loss attributable to noncontrolling interests  —     3 
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Solitario shareholders $(1,109) $10,103 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

31

SOLITARIO EXPLORATION & ROYALTY CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

(in thousands, of U.S. Dollars       Accumulated Total    
except share amounts)   Additional   Other Solitario Non- Total
  Common Stock Paid-in Accumulated Comprehensive Shareholders’ Controlling Shareholders’
  Shares Amount Capital Deficit Income Equity Interest Equity
Balance at December 31, 2014  39,247,689   393   54,512   (46,563)  (1,120)  7,222   (441)  6,781 
                                 
Stock option expense  —     —     566   —     —     566   —     566 
Issuance of shares for
mineral property
  66,500   —     51   —     —     51   —     51 
Noncontrolling interest contribution  —     —     —     —     —     —     188   188 
Sale of MH-LLC  —     —     —     —     —     —     256   256 
Repurchase of shares for
cancellation
  (145,000)  (1)  (66)          (67)      (67)
Net income (loss)  —     —     —     8,872   —     8,872   (3)  8,869 
Net unrealized gain  
  on marketable equity
  securities (net of deferred taxes)
  —     —     —     —     1,231   1,231   —     1,231 
Balance at December 31, 2015  39,169,189  $392  $55,063  $(37,691) $111  $17,875  $—    $17,875 
                                 
                                 
Stock option expense  —     —     970   —     —     970   —     970 
Repurchase of shares for
cancellation
  (475,600)  (5)  (243)          (248)      (248)
Net loss  —     —     —     (1,710)  —     (1,710)  —     (1,710)
Net unrealized gain  
  on marketable equity
  securities (net of deferred taxes)
  —     —     —     —     601   601   —     601 
Balance at December 31, 2016  38,693,589  $387  $55,790  $(39,401) $712  $17,488  $—    $17,488 
                                 
                                 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

32

SOLITARIO EXPLORATION & ROYALTY CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

(in thousands of U.S. Dollars) For the year ended
December 31,
  2016 2015
Operating activities:        
  Net income (loss) $(1,710) $8,869 
  Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:        
     Gain on derivative instruments  (672)  (84)
     Depreciation and amortization  5   11 
     Property abandonment and impairment  13   —   
     Employee stock option expense  970   566 
     Deferred income taxes  (353)  560 
    Gain on warrant liability  (4)  (51)
    (Gain) loss on asset and equity security sales  (26)  962 
     (Gain) on sale of discontinued operations  —     (12,309)
     Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
         Prepaid expenses and other current assets  (7)  (53)
         Accounts payable and other current liabilities  (51)  (4)
     Net cash (used in) operating activities from continuing operations  (1,835)  (1,533)
    Net cash (used in ) operating activities from discontinued operations  —     (190)
     Net cash (used in) operating activities  (1,835)  (1,723)
         
Investing activities:        
  Purchase of short-term investments (net)  (15,272)  —   
  Purchase of mineral property  (40)  —   
  Purchase of marketable equity securities  (304)  —   
  Proceeds from sale of marketable equity securities  56   809 
  Sale of derivative instrument, net  45   84 
  Additions to other assets  (1)  (8)
  Proceeds from sale of MH-LLC  —     24,000 
  Proceeds from sale of other assets  —     7 
     Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities from continuing operations  (15,516)  24,892 
     Net cash (used in) investing activities from discontinued operations  —     (1,059)
     Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  (15,516)  23,833 
         
Financing activities:        
  Repurchase of Solitario common stock for cancellation  (248)  (67)
  Repayment of long-term debt  —     (5,000)
  Noncontrolling interest contribution, net  —     188 
     Net cash used in financing activities  (248)  (4,879)
         
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents  (17,599)  17,231 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year  17,718   487 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $119  $17,718 
         
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:        
   Cash paid for interest, capitalized to mineral property $—    $228 
         
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash flow investing and financing activities:        
   Capitalized non-cash interest $—    $265 
   Capitalized depreciation $—    $7 
   Issuance of stock for mineral property $—    $51 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

33

SOLITARIO EXPLORATION & ROYALTY CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

1.Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Sale of Mt. Hamilton LLC

On August 25, 2015 Solitario Exploration & Royalty Corp. (“Solitario,” the “Company,” “we,” or “us”), along with DHI Minerals (U.S.) Ltd. (“DHI”), sold their combined interests in the Mt. Hamilton gold project (“Mt. Hamilton”) to Waterton Nevada Splitter, LLC (“Waterton”), for total cash proceeds of US$30 million (the “Transaction”) pursuant to a definitive agreement entered into on June 10, 2015 (the “Agreement”). Solitario sold its 80% interest in Mt. Hamilton LLC (“MH-LLC”), a limited liability company which held 100% of the Mt. Hamilton project assets, and DHI sold its 20% interest in MH-LLC. DHI is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ely Gold and Minerals, Inc. (“Ely”). Solitario received gross cash proceeds of US$24 million and DHI received gross cash proceeds of US$6 million. Solitario’s costs and fees related to the Transaction, including broker fees and professional service fees, were $439,000. Concurrent with the closing of the Transaction, Solitario paid $5,000,000 plus $7,000 of interest and fees to fully repay the funds Solitario had borrowed pursuant to a facility agreement (the “Facility Agreement”) with RMB Australia Holdings Limited (“RMBAH”) and RMB Resources, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“RMBR”). Certain warrants granted to RMB in connection with the Facility Agreement to acquire 1,624,748 shares of Solitario common stock (the “RMB Warrants”) expired unexercised during 2016.

During the year ended December 31, 2015 virtually all of the costs associated with MH-LLC and the assets sold were directly related to the development of the Mt. Hamilton project, and were capitalized to mineral property during all periods. Accordingly, separate presentation of discontinued operations would not have resulted in any material change to the results presented in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2015.2016.

The sale of MH-LLC in 2015 is shown as gain on sale of discontinued operations as follows:

(in thousands) Year ended December 31,
  2015
Proceeds from sale of MH-LLC $24,000 
Net assets and liabilities disposed of  9,998 
Noncontrolling interest  256 
Expenses of sale of MH-LLC  439 
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, before tax  13,307 
Income tax expense  998 
Gain on sale of discontinued operations $12,309 

Business and company formation

Solitario is an exploration stage company under Industry Guide 7, as issued by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Solitario was incorporated in the state of Colorado on November 15, 1984 as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Crown Resources Corporation ("Crown"). In July 1994, Solitario became a publicly traded company on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the "TSX") through its initial public offering. Solitario has been actively involved in mineral exploration since 1993. Solitario’s primary business is to acquire exploration mineral properties or royalties and/or discover economic deposits on its mineral properties and advance these deposits, either on its own or through joint ventures, up to the development stage. At that point, or sometime prior to that point, Solitario would attempt to sell its mineral properties, pursue their development either on its own, or through a joint venture with a partner that has expertise in mining operations, or create a royalty with a third party that continues to advance the property. In addition to focusing on its mineral exploration properties and the evaluation of mineral properties for acquisition or purchase of royalty interests, Solitario also evaluates potential strategic corporate transactions for the potential acquisition of new precious and base metal properties and assets with exploration potential or business combinations that we determine favorable to Solitario.

Solitario has recorded revenue in the past from the sale of mineral property, including the Transaction, and joint venture property payments and the sale of a royalty on its Mt. Hamilton property. Revenues from the sale or joint venture of properties, although significant when they occur, have not been a consistent annual source of revenue and would only occur in the future, if at all, on an infrequent basis.

34

Financial reporting

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Solitario and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("generally accepted accounting principles"), and are expressed in US dollars.

Revenue recognition

Solitario records delay rental payments as revenue in the period received. Any payments received for the sale of property interests are recorded as a reduction of the related property's capitalized cost. Proceeds which exceed the capitalized cost of the property without reserves are recognized as revenue. Payments received on the sale of properties with reserves are recognized as revenue to the extent the proceeds exceed the proportionate basis in the assets sold. There were no delay rental payments in either 2016 or 2015. In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) amended its guidance on revenue recognition. The core principle of those accounting standards it that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services. The standards are effective for revenue recognition by Solitario beginning in January 2018 and adoption is not expected to have a material impact on Solitario’s consolidated financial statements.

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Some of the more significant estimates included in the preparation of Solitario's financial statements pertain to: (i) Solitario’s carrying value of short-term investments; (ii) the recoverability of mineral properties related to its mineral exploration properties and their future exploration potential; (iii) the fair value of stock option grants to employees; (iv) the ability of Solitario to realize its deferred tax assets; (v) Solitario's investment in marketable equity securities; and (vi) the fair value of the Vendetta Mining Corp. (“Vendetta”) warrants Solitario owns.

In performing its activities, Solitario has incurred certain costs for mineral properties. The recovery of these costs is ultimately dependent upon the sale of mineral property interests or the development of economically recoverable ore reserves and the ability of Solitario to obtain the necessary permits and financing to successfully place the properties into production, and upon future profitable operations, none of which is assured.

Cash equivalents

Cash equivalents include investments in highly liquid money-market securities with original maturities of three months or less when purchased. As of December 31, 2016, a portion of Solitario’s cash and cash equivalents are held in brokerage accounts and foreign banks, which are not covered under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) rules for the United States.

Short-term investments

As of December 31, 2016, Solitario has $7,510,000 of our current assets in United States Treasury securities (“USTS”) with maturities of 15 days to one year. The USTS are recorded at their fair value, based upon quoted market prices. As of December 31, we have $7,499,000 in separate bank certificates of deposit (“CDs”) each with a maximum value of $250,000, and each of which are covered by Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance to the full face value of the CDs. At December 31, 2016, the CDs have maturities of between twenty days and eighteen months. Solitario’s short-term investments are recorded at their fair value, based upon quoted market prices. The short-term investments are highly liquid and may be sold in their entirety at any time at their quoted market price and are classified as a current asset.

35

Mineral properties

Solitario expenses all exploration costs incurred on its mineral properties prior to the establishment of proven and probable reserves through the completion of a feasibility study. Initial acquisition costs of its mineral properties are capitalized. Solitario regularly performs evaluations of its investment in mineral properties to assess the recoverability and/or the residual value of its investments in these assets. All long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances change which indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable, utilizing established guidelines based upon undiscounted future net cash flows from the asset or upon the determination that certain exploration properties do not have sufficient potential for economic mineralization.

Derivative instruments

Solitario accounts for its derivative instruments in accordance with ASC 815, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" (“ASC 815”). Solitario acquired its investment in Vendetta Mining Corp. units, including the Vendetta Warrants (defined below) during 2016. Solitario has classified the Vendetta Warrants as derivative instruments under ASC 815 and recorded the Vendetta Warrants at their fair value as other assets on the consolidated balance sheet. Changes in fair value of the Vendetta Warrants are recognized in the statement of operations in the period of change as gain or loss on derivative instruments. Solitario has entered into covered calls from time to time on its investment in Kinross marketable equity securities. Solitario has not designated its covered calls as hedging instruments and any changes in the fair value of the covered calls and its warrants are recognized in the statement of operations in the period of the change as gain or loss on derivative instruments.

Fair value

FASB ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”) establishes a framework for measuring fair value and requires enhanced disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. For certain of Solitario's financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents and accounts payable, the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their short-term maturities. Solitario's short-term investments in USTS and CDs, its marketable equity securities and any covered call options against those marketable equity securities are carried at their estimated fair value based on quoted market prices. Solitario’s investment in the Vendetta Warrants, defined below, is carried at fair value as determined by a Black-Scholes model. See Note 7, “Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” below.

Marketable equity securities

Solitario's investments in marketable equity securities are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value, which is based upon quoted prices of the securities owned. Solitario records investments in marketable equity securities as available-for-sale for investments in publicly traded marketable equity securities for which it does not exercise significant control and where Solitario has no representation on the board of directors of those companies and exercises no control over the management of those companies. The cost of marketable equity securities sold is determined by the specific identification method. Changes in fair value are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income within shareholders' equity, unless a decline in fair value is considered other than temporary, in which case the decline is recognized as a loss in the consolidated statements of operations.

Foreign exchange

The United States dollar is the functional currency for all of Solitario's foreign subsidiaries. Although Solitario's South American exploration activities during 2016 and 2015 have been conducted primarily in Peru a portion of the payments under the land, leasehold and exploration agreements of Solitario are denominated in United States dollars. Foreign currency gains and losses are included in the results of operations in the period in which they occur.

Income taxes

Solitario accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”). Under ASC 740, income taxes are provided for the tax effects of transactions reported in the financial statements and consist of taxes currently due plus deferred taxes related to certain income and expenses recognized in different periods for financial and income tax reporting purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the future tax return consequences of those differences, which will either be taxable or deductible when the assets and liabilities are recovered or settled. Deferred taxes are also recognized for operating losses and tax credits that are available to offset future taxable income and income taxes, respectively. A valuation allowance is provided if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

36

Accounting for uncertainty in income taxes

ASC 740 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a company's financial statements. ASC 740 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. ASC 740 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. ASC 740 provides that a company's tax position will be considered settled if the taxing authority has completed its examination, the company does not plan to appeal, and it is remote that the taxing authority would reexamine the tax position in the future. These provisions of ASC 740 had no effect on Solitario's financial position or results of operations. See Note 5, “Income Taxes,” below.

Earnings per share

The calculation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share is based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. Potentially dilutive shares related to outstanding common stock options of 40,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015, and the RMB Warrants of 1,624,748 for the year ended December 31, 2015 were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share because the effects were anti-dilutive. There were no similar potentially dilutive securities outstanding at December 31, 2016, and the effects of the potentially dilutive shares outstanding during the year ended December 31, 2016 were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the effects were anti-dilutive.

Employee stock compensation and incentive plans

Solitario classifies all of its stock options as equity options in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation.” See Note 9, “Employee Stock Compensation Plans,” below.

Recent accounting pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2014-09,Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), (“ASU No. 2014-09”), which amended the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition. ASU No. 2014-09 establishes principles for recognizing revenue upon the transfer of promised goods or services to customers, in an amount that reflects the expected consideration received in exchange for those goods or services. In July 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The amendments may be applied retrospectively to each prior period (full retrospective) or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of initial application (modified retrospective). Solitario will adopt ASU 2014-09 in the first quarter of 2018 and apply the full retrospective approach and does not expect the impact on its consolidated financial statements to be material.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases” (“ASU No. 2016-02”), which will require lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases that are not short-term in nature. For a lessor, the accounting applied is also largely unchanged from previous guidance. The new rules will be effective for Solitario in the first quarter of 2019. Solitario does not anticipate early adoption. Solitario does not expect the adoption of ASU No. 2016-02 to materially change its current accounting methods and therefore it does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In January 2016 the FASB issued ASU No 2016-01, Financial Instruments – Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (Topic 825) (“ASU No. 2016-01”). ASU No. 2016-01 revises the classification and measurement of investment in certain equity investments and the presentation of certain fair value changes for certain financial liabilities measured at fair value. ASU No. 2016-01 requires the change in fair value of many equity investments to be recognized in net income. ASU No. 2016-01 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. Adoption of ASU No. 2016-01 may result in a cumulative effect adjustment to the consolidated statement of equity retained earnings as of the beginning of the year of adoption. Solitario is evaluating the new guidance and has not determined the impact of ASU No. 2016-01 on its consolidated financial statements.

37

2.Mineral Properties:

The following table details Solitario’s capitalized investment in exploration mineral property:

(in thousands) December 31,
  2016 2015
Exploration    
   La Promesa (Peru) $6  $6 
   Montana Royalty property (US)  40   —   
   Canta Colorado (Peru)  —     3 
   Norcan (Mexico)  —     5 
   Aconchi (Mexico)  —     5 
         
     Total exploration mineral property $46  $19 

Capitalized costs

Solitario had been capitalizing its development costs incurred at its Mt. Hamilton project subsequent to the completion of a feasibility study on the Mt. Hamilton project in February 2012. The following table details the capitalization during 2015 up to the date of the Transaction:

(in thousands) Year ended
December 31,
  2015
Development expenditures $692 
Capitalized interest  493 
Property payments  190 
Capitalized depreciation  7 
  Total capitalized costs $1,382 

Included in the property payments during 2015 are the issuance of 66,500 common shares of Solitario with fair values of $51,000, issued to underlying leaseholders, which were recorded as an increase to common stock, for the par value of the shares issued and to additional paid-in-capital. Additionally, during 2015, Solitario capitalized interest due to RMBAH under the Facility Agreement, which was paid in full upon completion of the Transaction.

Exploration property

Solitario's exploration mineral properties at December 31, 2016 and 2015 consist of use rights related to its exploration properties, and the value of such assets is primarily driven by the nature and amount of economic mineral ore believed to be contained, or potentially contained, in such properties. The amounts capitalized as mineral properties include concession and lease or option acquisition costs. Capitalized costs related to a mineral property represent its fair value at the time it was acquired. At December 31, 2016, none of Solitario’s exploration properties have production (are operating) or contain proven or probable reserves. Solitario's exploration mineral properties represent interests in properties that Solitario believes have exploration and development potential. Solitario's mineral use rights generally are enforceable regardless of whether proven and probable reserves have been established.

In addition to its capitalized exploration properties, Solitario has an interest in its Bongará exploration concession, which is currently subject to a joint venture agreement where joint venture partners made stand-by joint venture payments to Solitario prior to January 1, 2015. Solitario recorded joint venture property payment revenue received in excess of capitalized costs. Per the joint venture agreement, as of December 31, 2016, no further standby joint-venture payments are due to Solitario on the Bongará project. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, Solitario has no remaining capitalized costs related to its Bongará joint venture.

Solitario previously sold its mineral interests in its Yanacocha exploration projects and retained a royalty interest. Solitario has no capitalized costs related to its Yanacocha royalty interest. During the year ended December 31, 2016, Solitario acquired certain net smelter royalties on non-producing exploration leases in Montana previously owned by Atna Resources, Ltd. for $40,000.

Discontinued projects

During 2016, Solitario closed its exploration office in Mexico. Solitario retained a 1% net smelter royalty on its Norcan and Aconchi exploration projects in Mexico. Solitario recorded a mineral property write-down of $10,000 related to the Norcan and Aconchi properties during 2016. During 2016, Solitario abandoned its interest in its Canta Colorado property in Peru and recorded a mineral property write-down expense of $3,000 related to Canta Colorado. In addition, Solitario recorded a loss on other assets in Mexico of $14,000 related to the cessation of its exploration activities in Mexico during 2016.

38

During 2015, Solitario converted its operating interest in Pedra Branca Mineracao, Ltd (“PBM”), which was the owner of the Pedra Branca project in Brazil, to a 1% net smelter royalty in the Pedra Branca project, upon the termination of its interest in PBM. Solitario had no remaining asset value related to its investment in PBM, as it had accounted for its interest in PBM under the equity method of accounting and had recognizing a reduction of its remaining interest in PBM to zero prior to the year ended December 31, 2015. Solitario recorded no mineral property write-down expense during 2015.

Exploration Expense

The following items comprised exploration expense:

  For the year ended
December 31,
(in thousands) 2016 2015
Geologic and field expenses $537  $31 
Administrative  91   58 
  Total exploration expense $628  $89 

3.Marketable Equity Securities

On May 2, 2016 Solitario purchased 7,240,000 units of Vendetta for aggregate consideration of $289,000. Each unit included one common share of Vendetta and one purchase warrant which allows the holder to purchase one share of Vendetta common stock at a price of Cdn$0.10 per share for a period of two years (the “Vendetta Warrants”). The purchase price of the units of $289,000 was allocated between the Vendetta common shares and the Vendetta Warrants based upon total fair values on the date of purchase. The Vendetta common stock was allocated a purchase cost of $186,000 and the Vendetta Warrants were allocated a purchase cost of $103,000. As of December 31, 2016, the common shares of Vendetta are carried at their fair value based upon the quoted market price of Vendetta, a publicly traded company on the TSX venture exchange, and included in marketable equity securities. The Vendetta Warrants are carried at their fair value, based upon a Black-Scholes valuation model. During the year ended December 31, 2016, Solitario recorded a gain on derivative instruments of $629,000, related to the Vendetta Warrants; see Note 6, “Derivative Instruments,” below.

The following tables summarize Solitario’s marketable equity securities and accumulated other comprehensive income related to its marketable equity securities:

(in thousands) December 31,
  2016 2015
  Marketable equity securities at fair value $1,339  $202 
  Cost  274   91 
  Accumulated other comprehensive income for
    unrealized holding gains
  1,065   111 
  Deferred taxes on accumulated other comprehensive
    income for unrealized holding gains
  353   —   
Accumulated other comprehensive income $712  $111 

39

The following table represents changes in marketable equity securities:

(in thousands) Year ended
       December 31,
  2016 2015
Gross cash proceeds from sales $56  $809 
Cost  16   1,778 
Gross gain (loss) on sale included in earnings during the period  40   (969)
Deferred taxes on gross gain on sale included in earnings  (15)  —   
Reclassification adjustment to unrealized gain in other
   comprehensive income for net (gain) loss included in earnings
  (25)  969 
Gross unrealized holding gain (loss) arising during the period
   included in other comprehensive income (loss)
  994   (1,296)
Deferred taxes on unrealized holding losses included in other comprehensive
(income) loss
  (368)  1,558 
Net unrealized holding gain  626   262 
Other comprehensive income  from marketable equity
   securities
 $601  $1,231 

4. Other Assets:

The following items comprised other assets:

(in thousands) December 31,
  2016 2015
Furniture and fixtures, net of accumulated depreciation $32  $41 
Exploration bonds and other assets  4   4 
Vendetta Warrants  735   —   
Total other assets $771  $45 

5.Income Taxes:

Solitario's income tax expense from continuing operations consists of the following as allocated between foreign and United States components:

(in thousands) 2016 2015
Current:        
  Federal $—    $—   
  State  —     —   
  Foreign  —     —   
Deferred:        
  Federal  (309)  662 
  State  (44)  (102)
  Foreign  —     —   
Income tax (benefit) expense $(353) $560 

Income tax (benefit) expense is included in the financial statements as follows:

(in thousands) 2016 2015
  Continuing Operations $(353) $560 
  Discontinued Operations  —     998 
  Other Comprehensive Income  353   (1,558)

Consolidated loss before income taxes includes losses from foreign operations of $154,000 and $98,000 in 2016 and 2015, respectively.

As discussed in Note 1, “Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” during 2015, the Transaction resulted in a $13,307,000 before tax gain reported in discontinued operations. Solitario recorded $998,000 of tax expense in discontinued operations which was net of $3,930,000 tax benefit for the release of valuation allowance. Income taxes have been allocated between discontinued operations and continuing operations in accordance with ASC 740.

See Note 3, “Marketable Equity Securities,” for detail of the deferred taxes associated with the sale of marketable equity securities and the deferred taxes associated with unrealized gains and losses associated with other comprehensive income related to marketable equity securities.

40

The net deferred tax assets/liabilities in the December 31, 2016 and 2015 consolidated balance sheets include the

following components:

(in thousands) 2016 2015
Deferred tax assets:        
  Loss carryovers $8,168  $6,982 
  Stock option compensation expense  —     7 
  Royalty  1,482   1,482 
  Unrealized loss on derivative securities  —     38 
  Other  105   105 
  Valuation allowance  (9,118)  (8,571)
Total deferred tax assets  637   43 
  Deferred tax liabilities:        
  Unrealized gain on derivative securities  196   —   
  Unrealized gains on marketable equity securities  395   41 
  Other  46   2 
Total deferred tax liabilities  637   43 
     Net deferred tax liabilities $—    $—   

A reconciliation of expected federal income taxes on income (loss) from continuing operations at statutory rates, with the expense for income taxes is as follows:

(in thousands) 2016 2015
Expected income tax benefit $(701) $(976)
Reversal of disproportionate tax effect in other comprehensive income  —     1,558 
Equity based compensation  366   575 
Foreign tax rate differences  6   3 
State income tax  (237)  (606)
True-up of deferred taxes  —     267 
Tax attributes of disposed subsidiary  1,652   3,941 
Previously unrecognized basis in disposed subsidiary  (1,884)  (4,170)
Change in valuation allowance  547   (40)
MH-LLC investment  —     1 
Permanent differences and other  (102)  7 
Income tax (benefit) expense $(353) $560 

During 2016, the valuation allowance was decreased primarily due to the removal of deferred tax assets related to abandoned properties in Mexico. During 2015, the valuation allowance was decreased primarily due to the utilization of loss carryforwards for which no tax benefit was previously realized.

During 2016 and 2015, other comprehensive income/(loss) was recognized in the amounts of approximately $954,000 and ($327,000), respectively. In 2016 we recognized an income tax benefit of $353,000 and in 2015 no tax benefit was recorded in other comprehensive income/(loss) as a $111,000 valuation allowance fully offset the attendant tax benefit.

At December 31, 2016, Solitario has unused US Federal Net Operating Loss ("NOL") carryovers of $1,658,000 and unused US State NOL carryovers of $3,191,000 which begin expiring in 2034. Solitario has unused Capital Loss carryovers of $11,845,000 for US Federal and US State purposes which begin expiring in 2019. Solitario has foreign loss carryforwards for which Solitario has provided a full valuation allowance and which expire over five years related to its prior exploration in Peru.

41

Solitario adopted ASC 740, which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. ASC 740 requires that Solitario recognize in its consolidated financial statements, only those tax positions that are “more-likely-than-not” of being sustained as of the adoption date, based on the technical merits of the position. As a result of the implementation of ASC 740, Solitario performed a comprehensive review of its material tax positions in accordance with recognition and measurement standards established by ASC 740. The provisions of ASC 740 had no effect on Solitario’s financial position, cash flows or results of operations at December 31, 2016 or December 31, 2015, or for the years then ended as Solitario had no unrecognized tax benefits.

Solitario and its subsidiaries are subject to the following material taxing jurisdictions: United States Federal, State of Colorado and Peru. Solitario’s United States federal return for years 2013 and forward and our United States state and Peru returns for tax years 2012 and forward are subject to examination. Solitario’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax benefits in income tax expense. Solitario has no accrued interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2016, or December 31, 2015 or for the years then ended

6.Derivative Instruments:

RMB warrants

The RMB Warrants, which entitled the holder to purchase a total of 1,624,748 shares of Solitario common stock, expired worthless on August 21, 2016. As of December 31, 2016, Solitario has no liability related to the RMB Warrants. Solitario recorded a $4,000 liability for the RMB Warrants as of December 31, 2015 for the fair value of the RMB Warrants based upon a Black-Scholes model. Solitario recorded a gain on derivative instruments of $4,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 related to the expiration of the RMB Warrants.

Covered call options

From time to time Solitario has sold covered call options against its holdings of Kinross. The business purpose of selling covered calls is to provide additional income on a limited portion of shares of Kinross that Solitario may sell in the near term, which is generally defined as less than one year. Solitario has not designated its covered calls as hedging instruments as described in ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging,” and any changes in the fair value of its covered calls are recognized in the statement of operations in the period of the change. As of December 31, 2016, Solitario had two covered calls against its holdings of Kinross common stock, which had a fair value of $2,000. As of December 31 2015, all of the covered calls had expired unexercised and there were no liabilities related to those calls entered during each of the years.

Solitario recorded the following gain on derivative instruments:

(in thousands) Year ended
December 31,
  2016 2015
  Gain on Kinross calls $43  $84 
  Gain on Vendetta Warrants  629   —   
  $672  $84 

The following table provides the location and amount of the fair values of Solitario's derivative instruments presented in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015:

  Derivatives
(in thousands) Balance Sheet Location 2016 2015
 Vendetta warrants Other assets $735  $—   
 RMB warrants Other current liabilities $—    $4 
 Kinross calls Other current liabilities $2  $—   

7.Fair Value of Financial Instruments:

For certain of Solitario's financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, payables and short-term debt, the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their short maturities. Solitario's marketable equity securities, including its investment in shares of Kinross common stock, Vendetta common stock and TNR Gold Corp (“TNR”) common stock, are carried at their estimated fair value primarily based on publicly available quoted market prices.

42

Solitario applies ASC 820, "Fair Value Measurements" (“ASC 820”). ASC 820 establishes a framework for measuring fair value and requires enhanced disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. ASC 820 also requires disclosure about how fair value is determined for assets and liabilities and establishes a hierarchy for which these assets and liabilities must be grouped, based on significant levels of inputs as follows:

Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Level 2: Quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability; or               Brian Labadie, Chairman
Level 3: Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

The determination of where assets and liabilities fall within this hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, there were no reclassifications in financial assets or liabilities between Level 1, 2 or 3 categories.

The following is a listing of Solitario’s financial assets and liabilities required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis and where they are classified within the hierarchy as of December 31, 2016:

(in thousands) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Assets                
  Marketable equity securities $1,339  $—    $—    $1,339 
  Vendetta Warrants      735       735 
Liabilities                
  Kinross calls  —     2   —     2 

The following is a listing of Solitario’s financial assets and liabilities required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis and where they are classified within the hierarchy as of December 31, 2015:

(in thousands) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Assets                
  Marketable equity securities $202  $—    $—    $202 
Liabilities                
  RMB Warrants  —     4   —     4 

Items measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

Marketable equity securities:At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the fair value of Solitario’s holdings in shares of Vendetta, Kinross, and TNR marketable equity securities and the Kinross calls are based upon quoted market prices.

Vendetta Warrants: The Vendetta Warrants are not traded on any public exchange. Solitario determines the fair value of the Vendetta Warrants using a Black-Scholes pricing model, using inputs, including share price, volatility of Vendetta common stock and discount rates that include an assessment of performance risk, that are readily available from public markets; therefore, they are classified as Level 2 inputs as of December 31, 2016.

RMB Warrants: The RMB Warrants were not traded on any public exchange. Solitario determined the fair value of the RMB Warrants using a Black-Scholes pricing model, using inputs, including share price, volatility of Solitario common stock and discount rates that include an assessment of performance risk, that are readily available from public markets; therefore, they are classified as Level 2 inputs as of December 31, 2015.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, Solitario did not change any of the valuation techniques used to measure its financial assets and liabilities at fair value.

8.Commitments and Contingencies:

In acquiring its interests in mineral claims and leases, Solitario has entered into lease agreements, which may be canceled at its option without penalty. Solitario is required to make minimum rental and option payments in order to maintain its interests in certain claims and leases. See Note 2, “Mineral Properties,” above. Solitario estimates its 2017 property rentals and option payments, excluding certain earn-in payments discussed below, for properties we own or operate to be approximately $271,000. Assuming that our joint ventures continue in their current status and that we do not appreciably change our property positions on existing properties, approximately $263,000 of these annual payments are paid or are reimbursable to us by our joint venture partners. In addition, we may be required to make further payments in the future if we elect to exercise our options under those agreements or if we enter into new agreements.

Solitario leases office space under a non-cancelable operating lease for the Wheat Ridge, Colorado office which provides for total minimum annual rent payments of $38,000 through January of 2019.

43

9.Employee Stock Compensation Plans:

On August 24, 2016, the holders of options to acquire Solitario common stock voluntarily surrendered for cancellation all options previously granted to such persons pursuant to the 2013 Solitario Exploration and Royalty Corp Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan (the “2013 Plan”) and the 2006 Stock Option Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”). Solitario cancelled the options upon surrender. As a result, there are no outstanding options under either the 2006 Plan or the 2013 Plan as of December 31, 2016.

Historically, stock option awards at the time of grant had a five year term and vested 25% on date of grant and 25% on each of the next three anniversary dates. Solitario recognizes stock option compensation expense on the date of grant for 25% of the grant date fair value, and subsequently, based upon a straight line amortization of the unvested grant date fair value of each of its outstanding options. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, Solitario recorded $970,000 and $516,000, respectively, of stock option expense for the amortization of the grant date fair value through the date of cancellation and for any unrecognized grant date fair value on the date of cancellation of each of its outstanding options with a credit to additional paid-in-capital. Solitario classifies its stock options under the 2006 Plan and the 2013 Plan as equity options in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation.”

a.)     The 2006 Plan

On June 27, 2006, Solitario's shareholders approved the 2006 Plan. Under the terms of the 2006 Plan, the Board of Directors reserved a total of 2,800,000 shares of Solitario common stock for the potential awards to directors, officers and employees with exercise prices equal to the market price of Solitario's common stock at the date of grant. As of June 26, 2016, the 2006 Plan terminated, and in accordance with the terms of the 2006 Plan, no additional awards may be made pursuant to the 2006 Plan.

b.)     2006 Plan stock option grants

The following table shows the grant date fair value of Solitario’s only option grant during either 2016 or 2015 from the 2006 Plan as of the date of grant.

Grant date fair value

Grant Date 6/22/16
Option – grant date price (Cdn$) $0.72 
Options granted  350,000 
Expected life years  5.0 
Expected volatility  63%
Risk free interest rate  1.0%
Weighted average fair value $0.30 
Grant date fair value $105,000 

c.)     2006 Plan stock option activity

During 2016 and 2015 there were no shares issued from the exercise of options. The following table summarizes the activity for stock options outstanding under the 2006 Plan as of December 31, 2016 and 2015:

44

  2016 2015
    Weighted     Weighted  
    Average Aggregate   Average Aggregate
    Exercise Intrinsic   Exercise Intrinsic
  Options Price (Cdn$) Value(1) Options Price (Cdn)$ Value(1)
2006 Plan            
Outstanding, beginning of year  40,000  $1.66       2,348,000  $1.66     
Granted  350,000  $0.72       —     —       
Exercised  —     —         —     —       
Cancelled/expired (2)  (390,000) $0.82       (2,188,000)  1.66     
Forfeited  —     —         (120,000)  1.60     
Outstanding, end of year  —     —    $—     40,000  $1.60  $—   
Exercisable, end of year  —     —    $—     20,000  $1.60  $—   

(1)The intrinsic value at December 31, 2015 based upon the quoted market price of Cdn$0.70, respectively, per share for our common stock on the TSX and an exchange ratio of 0.72120, United States dollars per Canadian dollar. There were no options outstanding from the 2006 Plan at December 31, 2016.

(2)On August 24, 2016, holders of option awards from the 2006 Plan voluntarily cancelled awards for 350,000 options with an option price of Cdn$.072 with an expiration date of June 21, 2021 and 40,000 options with an option price of Cdn$1.66 with an expiration date of August 14, 2019 to allow Solitario to have additional financial flexibility. No consideration was given or received by the holders of the options to cancel the awards.

d.)     The 2013 Plan

On June 18, 2013, Solitario’s shareholders approved the 2013 Plan. Under the terms of the 2013 Plan, a total of 1,750,000 shares of Solitario common stock are reserved for awards to Directors, officers, employees and consultants. Such awards may take the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, and restricted stock units. The terms and conditions of the awards are pursuant to the 2013 Plan and are granted by the Board of Directors or a committee appointed by the Board of Directors.

e.)     2013 Plan stock option grants

The following table shows the grant date fair value of Solitario’s only award during either 2016 or 2015 from the 2013 Plan as of the date of grant.

Grant date fair value

Grant Date 7/28/16
Option – grant date price $0.72 
Options granted  1,699,000 
Expected life years  5.0 
Expected volatility  63%
Risk free interest rate  0.9%
Weighted average fair value $0.50 
Grant date fair value $850,000 

Solitario made no grants of awards during 2015 from the 2013 Plan. Options grants from the 2013 Plan have a five-year term, and vest 25% on date of grant and 25% on each of the next three anniversary dates. Solitario recognizes stock option compensation expense on the date of grant for 25% of the grant date fair value, and subsequently, based upon a straight-line amortization of the unvested grant date fair value and for any unrecognized grant date fair value on the date of cancellation of each of its outstanding options.

f.)     Stock option activity

During 2016 and 2015 no options granted from the 2013 Plan were exercised. The following table summarizes the activity for stock options and RSUs outstanding under the 2013 Plan as of December 31, 2016 and 2015:

  2016 2015
    Weighted     Weighted  
    Average Aggregate   Average Aggregate
  RSUs/ Exercise Intrinsic RSUs/ Exercise Intrinsic
  Options Price Value(1) Options Price Value(1)
2013 Plan            
Outstanding, beginning of year  —     —         1,400,000  $0.96     
Granted  1,699,000  $0.72       —     —       
Exercised  —     —         —     —       
Cancelled/expired(2)  (1,699,000)  0.94       (1,250,000)  0.94     
Forfeited  —     1.10       (150,000)  1.10     
Outstanding, end of year  —     —    $—     —     —    $—   
Exercisable, end of year  —     —    $—     —     —    $—   

45

(1)There were no options outstanding from the 2013 Plan at December 31, 2016 and 2015.

(2) On August 24, 2016, holders of option awards from the 2013 Plan voluntarily cancelled awards for 1,699,000 options with an option price of $.072 with an expiration date of July 27, 2021 to allow Solitario to have additional financial flexibility. No consideration was given or received by the holders of the options to cancel the awards.

10.       Share Repurchase Program

On October 28, 2015, Solitario’s Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program that initially authorized Solitario to purchase up to two million shares of its outstanding common stock through December 31, 2016. During 2016, Solitario’s Board of Directors extended the expiration date of the share repurchase program through December 31, 2017. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, Solitario purchased 475,600 and 145,000 shares of Solitario common stock, respectively, for an aggregate purchase price of $248,000 and $67,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2016, Solitario has purchased a total of 620,600 shares for an aggregate purchase price of $315,000 under the share repurchase program since its inception.

46

Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None

Item 9A.Controls and Procedures

The management of Solitario is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act). During the fiscal period covered by this report, Solitario's management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of Solitario’s internal control over financial reporting and the design and operation of Solitario’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act). This evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting was based on the framework and criteria established inInternal ControlIntegrated Framework (2013), issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on such evaluations, Solitario’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2016, Solitario’s internal control over financial reporting is effective and that its disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by Solitario in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in its reports is accumulated and communicated to Solitario’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There were no changes in internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended December 31, 2016.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. As a smaller reporting company, Solitario’s management’s report was not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Item 9B.Other Information

          None

47

PARTIII

Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

          The information required under Item 10 is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth in our definitive proxy statement in connection with the annual meeting of shareholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act (the "2017 Proxy").

Item 11.Executive Compensation

          The information required under Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth in the 2017 Proxy.               Leonard Harris
               John Labate

 

Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

The information on Solitario’s equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2016 is included in Item 5 of Part II of the Annual Report on Form 10-K “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities” and is further described in Note 9, “Employee Stock Compensation Plans” in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of the Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

To our knowledge, as of April 25, 2017, no person beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, or exercises control or direction over, more than five percent of our issued and outstanding Common Stock with the exception of Newmont Mining Corporation of Canada Limited, which directly owns 2,700,000 shares representing approximately 7.0 percent of our issued and outstanding Common Stock.

The following table sets forth, as of April 25, 2017, the beneficial ownership of our outstanding Common Stock by each of our shareholders owning more than five percent, our directors, each Named Executive Officer and all of our executive officers and directors as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, the persons listed in the table below have sole voting and investment powers with respect to the shares indicated. Except as indicated below the mailing address for each person is 4251 Kipling Street, Suite 390, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033.

15

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership*(1) Percent of Class*
John Labate, Director  —     ** 
Leonard Harris, Director  67,476   ** 
Christopher E. Herald, CEO and Director  1,505,000   3.9%
Brian Labadie, Director  192,857   ** 
Walter H. Hunt, COO  391,962   1.0%
James R. Maronick, CFO  583,048   1.5%
All directors and executive officers as a group  2,740,343   7.1%
Newmont Mining Corporation of Canada
20 Eglinton Ave West, Suite 1900
Toronto, Ontario M4R 1K8
  2,700,000   7.0%

*     Calculated in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act and Item 12 is incorporated herein403of Regulation S-K.

**     Indicates holdings of less than 1%.

(1)     None of our directors or Named Executive Officers beneficially own any shares of Common Stock that may by referenceacquired under options granted pursuant to the information set forth2013 Plan or the 2006 Plan.

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

As noted under "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" above, the Company entered into certain change in control agreements on March 14, 2007 with the following Named Executive Officers: Christopher E. Herald, James R. Maronick and Walter H. Hunt (as defined above, each such agreement being a “CIC”). The terms of the CICs are more fully described under "Change in Control Agreements" in the 2017 Proxy."Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section above. The potential payments to each Named Executive Officer are described below in the event of an assumed change in control as defined in the applicable CIC as of December 31, 2016.

Name Salary(1) Stock option vesting(2) Tax gross up(3) Total
Christopher E. Herald, CEO $502,500  $—    $—    $495,000 
James R. Maronick, CFO  375,000   —     —     375,000 
Walter H, Hunt, COO  407,500   —     —     400,000 

(1)Two and one half times base salary as of December 31, 2016. Paid as a lump sum payment.
(2)None of our Named Executive Officers have any outstanding options or equity awards at December 31, 2016. Accordingly, there was no intrinsic value from the acceleration of any unvested options owned by the Named Executive Officer as of December 31, 2016.
(3)The change in control provides for a gross-up for taxes in the event the combined salary and all other compensation, triggered by a change in control, results in Excise Tax, as defined by Section 4999 of the Code. The CIC provide for additional cash compensation to pay the Named Executive Officer for the Excise Tax, which is 20% of all compensation in excess of the base salary amount, when the total payments, including the fair value from acceleration of vesting for unvested options, under the CIC exceed three times base salary. We have estimated that no tax gross up would have been due or payable as of December 31, 2016 because the total compensation, including the fair value from the acceleration of any outstanding unvested options would not exceed three times the base salary.

 

Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

 

There are no material interests, direct or indirect, of current directors, executive officers, or any shareholder who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, more than 10% of the outstanding shares of Solitario common stock, or any known associates or affiliates of such persons, in any transaction since the beginning of the Company’s last fiscal year or in any proposed transaction which has materially affected or would materially affect the Company and in which the amount involved exceeded $120,000.

Policy Regarding Related Party Transactions

The informationBoard of Directors has adopted a written Related Party Transaction Policy. Pursuant to that policy, Solitario may enter into transactions with respectcertain "related persons." Related persons include the Company's executive officers, directors, 5% or more beneficial owners of the Company's Common Stock, immediate family members of these persons and entities in which one of these persons has a direct or indirect material interest. These transactions are referred to Item 13 is incorporated herein by referenceas "related party transactions." All related party transactions are subject to the information set forthfollowing related party transaction policy requirements:

16

·the transaction must be approved by disinterested members of the Board;
·the Audit Committee must approve or ratify such transaction and the terms of the transaction are comparable to that which could be attained in an arm's-length dealing with unrelated third parties; or
·a transaction that involves compensation must be approved by the Compensation Committee.

Director Independence

Solitario’s Board has determined Mr. Labate, Mr. Harris, Mr. Jones and Mr. Labadie are independent members of the Board of Directors in accordance with Section 803(A) of the 2017 Proxy.NYSE-MKT Company Guide.

·Mr. Labate, Mr. Labadie and Mr. Harris are members of the Audit Committee.
·Mr. Labate, Mr. Labadie and Mr. Harris are members of the Compensation Committee.
·Mr. Labate, Mr. Labadie and Mr. Harris are members of the Nominating Committee.

 

Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services

          

Audit Fees

The informationfollowing table summarizes the aggregate fees billed to Solitario by EKS&H LLLP for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

 20162015
Audit Fees (1)$40,000$39,000
Audit related fees (2)33,00027,000
Tax fees (3)22,00037,000
All other fees (4)-    30,000
Total$95,000$133,000

(1)Fees billed for audit services in 2016 and 2015 consisted of:
i.Audit of our annual financial statements for 2016 and 2015.
ii.Consents and other services related to SEC filings.
(2)Represents fees billed related to reviews of our quarterly reports for 2016 and 2015.
(3)Represents fees billed in connection with the preparation and filing of our United States federal and Colorado state income tax returns.
(4)All other fees in 2015 primarily include audit related fees billed for accounting and tax consultations related to the sale of our membership interest in MH-LLC during 2015, an IRS examination of MH-LLC, transaction structuring for our former subsidiary, Altoro Gold Corp. and our Bongará project and other matters.

Pre-approval of Audit Fees

On an annual basis the Audit Committee approves the proposed audit services and the fees related thereto by our independent auditors in advance of the year of service in accordance with the pre-approval policy adopted by the Audit Committee. All other fees are pre-approved on an ongoing basis as required. The Audit Committee pre-approval policy requires that the Audit Committee determine that proposed services and related fees are required and reasonable under Item 14 is incorporated hereinthe circumstances. All of the fees billed to Solitario by referenceEKS&H LLLP during 2016 and 2015 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to the information set forth inAudit Committee pre-approval policy. The Audit Committee considered whether the 2017 Proxy.provision of non-audit services is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant's independence and has determined that the provision is compatible.

 48
 

PART IV

 

Item 15.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

 

          The following documents are filed as a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

1.     Financial Statements

          The following financial statements contained in Part II, Item 8 are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

Consolidated Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

2.     Financial Statement Schedules

          Financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not required or are not applicable, or the required information is provided in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto described in Item 15(1) above.

3.     Exhibits

          The Exhibits listed in the Index to Exhibits, which appears immediately following the signature page and is incorporated herein by reference, are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

49

SIGNATURES

          Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

SOLITARIO EXPLORATION & ROYALTY CORP.
By:/s/ James R. Maronick
     Chief Financial Officer
Date:March 10, 2017

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate
/s/

Christopher E. Herald,

Chief Executive Officer

Principal Executive Officer and  DirectorMarch 10, 2017
/s/
James R. Maronick,
Chief Financial Officer
Principal Financial and Accounting OfficerMarch 10, 2017

   |
   |
   |
   |
   |
   |
   |
   |
   |
   |
   |
   |
   |
   |
|
/s/
John Labate
A majority of
/s/the Board ofMarch 10, 2017
Brian LabadieDirectors
/s/
Leonard Harris
By: /s/
      James R. Maronick,
           Attorney-in-fact

50

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

 

Description
3.1  
3.1Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Solitario Exploration & Royalty Corp., as Amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Solitario’s Form 10-Q filed on August 10, 2010)
 
   
3.2Amended and Restated By-laws of Solitario Exploration & Royalty Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Solitario’s Form 8-K filed on March 22, 2013)
 
   
4.1Form of Common Stock Certificate of Solitario Exploration & Royalty Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Solitario’s Form 10-Q filed on August 7, 2008)
 
   
10.1Membership Interest Purchase Agreement between Solitario Exploration & Royalty Corp., Ely Gold & Minerals, Inc., DHI Minerals (U.S.) Ltd., and Waterton Nevada Splitter LLC dated June 10, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Solitario’s Form 8-K filed on June 12, 2015)
 
   
10.2Waterton Commitment Letter Agreement between Solitario Exploration & Royalty Corp. and Waterton Precious Metals Fund II Cayman, LP dated June 10, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Solitario’s Form 8-K filed on June 12, 2015)
 
   

10.3

Consent and Waiver between Solitario Exploration & Royalty Corp., Ely Gold & Minerals, Inc., and DHI Minerals (U.S.) Ltd. dated June 10, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Solitario’s Form 8-K filed on June 12, 2015)
 
   
10.42013 Solitario Exploration & Royalty Corp. Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Solitario’s Form 8-K filed on June 20, 2013)
 
   
10.5Alliance Agreement, dated January 18, 2005, between Solitario Resources Corporation and Newmont Overseas Exploration Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Solitario's Form 8-K filed on January 20, 2005)
 
   
10.6Amended and Restated Royalty Grant, dated January 18, 2005, between Solitario Resources Corporation and Minera Los Tapados S.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to Solitario's Form 8-K filed on January 20, 2005)
 
   
10.7Change in Control Severance Benefits Agreement between Solitario Resources Corporation and Christopher E. Herald, dated as of March 14, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Solitario's Form 8-K filed on March 14, 2007)
 
   
10.8Change in Control Severance Benefits Agreement between Solitario Resources Corporation and James R. Maronick, dated as of March 14, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to Solitario's Form 8-K filed on March 14, 2007)
 
   
10.9Change in Control Severance Benefits Agreement between Solitario Resources Corporation and Walter W. Hunt, dated as of March 14, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to Solitario's Form 8-K filed on March 14, 2007)
 
   
10.10Framework Agreement for the Exploration and Development of Potential Mining Properties, related to Solitario's 100% owned Bongará project in Peru between Minera Bongará S.A., Minera Solitario Peru S.A.C., Solitario Resources Corporation, and Votorantim Metais – Cajamarquilla S.A., dated March 24, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Solitario's Form 8-K filed on October 4, 2007)
   
14.1Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Solitario's Form 8-K filed on July 18, 2006)
     

 21.1** Subsidiaries of Solitario Exploration & Royalty Corp.
     
 

51

23.1** Consent of EKS&H LLLP
     
 24.1** Power of Attorney
     
 31.1* Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to SEC Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
     
 31.2* Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to SEC Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
     
 32.1* Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
     
 101** The following financial statements, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015; (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015; and (vi) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
     

* Filed herewith

** Exhibit was previously filed with the original Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2016.

17

SIGNATURES

          Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

SOLITARIO EXPLORATION & ROYALTY CORP.
By:/s/ James R. Maronick
     Chief Financial Officer
Date:April 25, 2017

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate
/s/

Christopher E. Herald,

Chief Executive Officer

Principal Executive Officer and  DirectorApril 25, 2017
/s/
James R. Maronick,
Chief Financial Officer
Principal Financial and Accounting OfficerApril 25, 2017

   |
   |
   |
   |
   |
   |
   |
   |
   |
   |
   |
   |
   |
   |
|
/s/
John Labate **
A majority of
/s/the Board ofApril 25, 2017
Brian Labadie **Directors
/s/
Leonard Harris **

**By James R. Maronick, attorney-in-fact pursuant to power of attorney granted in the Original Filing.