UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
| | | | | |
| ☒ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172019
or
|
| | | | |
¨☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-23081
FARO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
| | |
Florida | | 59-3157093 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation or Organization)
| | (I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| Florida | | 59-3157093 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation or Organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| 250 Technology Park, | Lake Mary, FL | Florida | 32746 |
| (Address of Principal Executive Offices) | | | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (407) 333-9911
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Title of each class | Trading Symbols(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered |
| Common Stock, par value $.001 | FARO | The Nasdaq Global SelectStock Market LLC |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨☐ No ý☒
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨☐ No ý☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant:registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý☒ No ¨☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý☒ No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definite proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.¨
☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company”company,” and "emerging“emerging growth company"company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Large accelerated filer | ý
☒ | | Accelerated filer | ¨☐ |
| Non-accelerated filer | ¨☐ | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨☐ |
| | | Emerging growth company | ¨
| | | ☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨☐ No ý☒
The aggregate market value of the Registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on June 30, 201728, 2019 (the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was $622,261,000$895,727,799 based on the closing price of the Registrant’s common stock on such date on the Nasdaq Global Select Market, and assuming solely for the purposes of this calculation that all directors and executive officers of the Registrant are “affiliates.”
As of February 19, 2018,17, 2020, there were outstanding 16,797,61817,601,851 shares of the Registrant’s common stock.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant’s proxy statement for the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | |
| | Page |
| | |
| Item 1. | | |
| Item 1A. | | |
| Item 1B. | | |
| Item 2. | | |
| Item 3. | | |
| Item 4. | | |
| | |
| | |
| Item 5. | | |
| Item 6. | | |
| Item 7. | | |
| Item 7A. | | |
| Item 8. | | |
| Item 9. | | |
| Item 9A. | | |
| Item 9B. | | |
| | |
| | |
| Item 10. | | |
| Item 11. | | |
| Item 12. | | |
| Item 13. | | |
| Item 14. | | |
| | |
| | |
| Item 15. | | |
| Item 16. | | |
PART I
CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS FOR FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
FARO Technologies, Inc. (“FARO,” the “Company,” “us,” “we” or “our”) has made “forward-looking statements” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Statements that are not historical facts or that describe our plans, beliefs, goals, intentions, objectives, projections, expectations, assumptions, strategies, or future events are forward-looking statements. In addition, words such as “may,” “might,” “would,” “will,” “will be,” “future,” “strategy,” “believe,” “plan,” “should,” “could,” “seek,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “goal,” “objective,” “project,” “forecast,” “target” and similar words identify forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Consequently, undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements. We do not intend to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, unless otherwise required by law. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated in such forward-looking statements include, among others, the following:
•an economic downturn in the manufacturing industry or the domestic and international economies in the regions of the world where we operate;
•our inability to further penetrate our customer base and target markets;
•our ability to realize the intended benefits of our undertaking to transition to a company that is reorganized around functions to improve the efficiency of our sales organization and to improve operational effectiveness;
•our inability to successfully execute our new strategic plan and restructuring plan, including but not limited to additional impairment charges and/or higher than expected severance costs and exit costs, and our inability to realize the expected benefits of such plans;
•development by others of new or improved products, processes or technologies that make our products less competitive or obsolete;
•our inability to maintain what we believe to be our technological advantage by developing new products and enhancing our existing products;
•the outcome of the U.S. Government’s review of, or investigation into, our potential overcharging of the U.S. Government under our General Services Administration Federal Supply Schedule contracts, any resulting penalties, damages or sanctions imposed on us and the outcome of any resulting litigation to which we may become a party, loss of future government sales and potential impacts on customer and supplier relationships and our reputation;
•risks associated with expandingour international operations, such as difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations, increased political and economic instability, compliance with potentially evolving import and export regulations, and the burdens and potential exposure of complying with a wide variety of U.S. and foreign laws and labor practices;
•changes in trade regulation, which result in rising prices of imported steel, steel byproducts, aluminum, and aluminum byproducts used as raw materials in the production of measurement devices, and our ability to pass those costs on to our customers or require our suppliers to absorb such costs;
•changes in foreign regulation, which may result in rising prices of our measurement devices sold as exports to our international customers, our customers’ willingness to absorb incremental import tariffs, and the corresponding impact on our profitability;
•our inability to successfully identify and acquire target companies and achieve expected benefits from, and effectively integrate, acquisitions that are consummated;
•the cyclical nature of the industries of our customers and material adverse changes in our customers’ access to liquidity and capital;
•change in the potential for the computer-aided measurement (“CAM2”) market and the potential adoption rate for our products, which are difficult to quantify and predict;
•our inability to protect our patents and other proprietary rights in the United States and foreign countries;
•our inability to adequately establish and maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting;
•fluctuations in our annual and quarterly operating results and the inability to achieve our financial operating targets as a result of a number of factors including, without limitation (i) litigation and regulatory action brought against us, (ii) quality issues with our products, (iii) excess or obsolete inventory, shrinkage or other inventory losses due to product obsolescence, change in demand for our products, scrap or material price changes, (iv) raw material price fluctuations and other inflationary pressures, (v) expansion of our manufacturing capability, (vi) the size and timing of customer orders, (vii) the amount of time that it takes to fulfill orders and ship our products, (viii) the length of our sales cycle to new customers and the time and expense incurred in further penetrating our existing customer base, (ix) increases in operating expenses required formanufacturing inefficiencies associated with new product introductions, (x) costs associated with new product introductions, such as product development, marketing, assembly line start-up costs and new product marketing, (x)low introductory period production volumes, (xi) the timing and market acceptance of new products and product enhancements, (xi)(xii) customer order deferrals in anticipation of new products and product enhancements, (xii)(xiii) the inability of our sales and marketing programs to achieve their sales targets, (xiii)(xiv) start-up costs associated with opening new sales offices outside of the United States, (xiv)(xv) fluctuations in revenue without proportionate adjustments in fixed costs, (xv)(xvi) inefficiencies in the management of our inventories and fixed assets, (xvi)and (xvii) compliance with government regulations including health, safety, and environmental matters, and (xvii) investment costs associated with the training and ramp-up time for new sales people;matters;
•changes in gross margin due to a changing mix of products sold and the different gross margins on different products and sales channels;
•changes in applicable laws, rules or regulations, or their interpretation or enforcement, or the enactment of new laws, rules or regulations that apply to our business operations or require us to incur significant expenses for compliance;
•our inability to successfully comply with the requirements of the Restriction of use of Hazardous Substances (“ROHS2”) Directive and the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (“WEEE”) Directive in the European Union;
•the inability of our products to displace traditional measurement devices and attain broad market acceptance;
•the impact of competitive products and pricing on our current offerings;
the loss of •our Chief Executive Officer orability to successfully retain our executive officers and other key personnel;
•delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers;
•difficulties in recruiting research and development engineers and application engineers;
•the failure to effectively manage the effects of any future growth;
•the impact of reductions or projected reductions in government spending, or uncertainty regarding future levels of government expenditures, particularly in the defense sector;
•variations in our effective income tax rate, which make it difficult to predict our effective income tax rate on a quarterly and annual basis, and the impact of the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017;basis;
•the loss of key suppliers and the inability to find sufficient alternative suppliers in a reasonable period of time or on commercially reasonable terms;
•the impact of fluctuations in exchange rates;
•the effect of estimates and assumptions with respect to critical accounting policies and the impact of the adoption of recently issued accounting pronouncements;
•the impacteffect of new product introductions,changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which we operate, including the costs associated with new product introductions, such as product development, marketing, assembly line start-up costseffect of changes in U.S. trade policies or the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union, on general market conditions, global trade policies and low introductory period production volumes, and manufacturing inefficiencies associated with new product introductions;currency exchange rates;
•the magnitude of increased warranty costs from new product introductions and enhancements to existing products;
•the sufficiency of our plants to meet manufacturing requirements;
•the continuation of our share repurchase program;
•the sufficiency of our working capital and cash flow from operations to fund our long-term liquidity requirements;
•the impact of geographic changes in the manufacturing or sales of our products on our effective income tax rate; and
•our ability to comply with the requirements for favorable income tax rates in foreign jurisdictions.
A detailed discussion of these and other risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from such forward-looking statements is included throughout this filing and particularly in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Moreover, new risks and uncertainties emerge from time to time, and we undertake no obligation to update publicly or review the risks and uncertainties included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, unless otherwise required by law.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
FARO was founded in 1982 and re-incorporated in Florida in 1992. Our worldwide headquarters are located at 250 Technology Park, Lake Mary, Florida 32746 and our telephone number is (407) 333-9911.
We are a global technology company that designs, develops, manufactures, markets and supports software driven, three-dimensional (“3D”) measurement and imaging and realization systems.solutions. This technology permits high-precision 3D measurement, imaging and comparison of parts and complex structures within production and quality assurance processes. Our devices are used for inspection of components and assemblies, rapid prototyping, reverse engineering, documenting large volume or structures in 3D, surveying and construction, as well as for investigation and reconstruction of accident sites or crime scenes. We sell the majority of our products through a direct sales force across a broad number of customers in a range of manufacturing, industrial, architecture, surveying, building information modeling, construction, public safety forensics, cultural heritage, and other applications. Our FaroArm®, FARO ScanArm®, FARO Gage®, FARO Laser TrackerTM, FARO Cobalt Array Imager, FARO Laser Projector, and their companion CAM2®, BuildIT, and RayTracerBuildIT ProjectorTM software solutions, provide for Computer-Aided Design (“CAD”) based inspection, factory-level statistical process control, high-density surveying, and laser-guided assembly and production. Together, these products integrate the measurement, quality inspection, and reverse engineering functions with CAD and 3D software to improve productivity, enhance product quality, and decrease rework and scrap in the manufacturing process, mainly supporting applications in our Factory Metrology vertical.the automotive, aerospace, metal and machine fabrication and other industrial manufacturing markets. Our FARO Focus and FARO Scanner Freestyle3DX laser scanners,ScanPlan, and their companion FARO SCENE, BuildIT, FARO PointSense,As-BuiltTM, and FARO Zone public safety forensics software offerings, are utilized for a wide variety of 3D modeling, documentation and high-density surveying applications primarily in our Construction Building Information Modeling - Construction Information Managementthe architecture, engineering and construction (“Construction BIM-CIM”AEC”) and Public Safety Forensics verticals.public safety markets. Our FARO ScanArm®, FARO Cobalt Array Imager, FARO Scanner Freestyle3DX laser scanners and theirits companion SCENE software also enable a fully digital workflow used to capture real world geometry for the purpose of empowering design, enabling innovation, and speeding up the design cycle, supporting our Productcycle.
Since the fourth quarter of 2016, we had operated in five verticals—3D Manufacturing, Construction Building Information Modeling (“Construction BIM”), Public Safety Forensics, 3D Design vertical. FARO Visual Inspect enables large, complex and Photonics—and had three reporting segments—3D CAD data to be transferred to a tablet deviceManufacturing, Construction BIM and then used for mobile visualization and comparison to real world conditions, facilitating in-process inspection, assembly, guidance and positioning for applicationsEmerging Verticals. As discussed in our Factory MetrologyQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the third quarter of 2019, our new management team, led by our new Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), formulated and Construction BIM-CIM verticals.began to implement a new comprehensive strategic plan for our business. As part of our strategic planning process, we identified areas of our business that needed enhanced focus or change in order to improve our efficiency and cost structure. As part of our new strategic plan, we have reassessed and redefined our go-to-market strategy, refocused our marketing engagement with our customers and re-evaluated our hardware product portfolio and have begun to focus on other organizational optimization efforts, including the simplification of our overly complex management structure.
As part of our new strategic plan, and based on the recommendation of our CEO, who is also our Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”), in the fourth quarter of 2019, we eliminated our vertical structure and began reorganizing the Company into a functional structure. Our lineexecutive leadership team is now comprised of galvanometer-based scan headsfunctional leaders in areas such as sales, marketing, operations, research and laser scan controllersdevelopment and general and administrative, and resources are used inallocated to each function at a consolidated unit level. We no longer have separate business units, or segment managers or vertical leaders who report to the CODM with respect to operations, operating results or planning for levels or components below the total Company level. Instead, our CODM now allocates resources and evaluates performance on a Company-wide basis. Based on these changes, commencing with the fourth quarter of 2019, we are now reporting as one reporting segment that develops, manufactures, markets, supports and sells CAD-based quality assurance products integrated with CAD-based inspection and statistical process control software and 3D documentation systems. Our reporting segment sells into a variety of laser applicationsend markets, including automotive, aerospace, metal and machine fabrication, architecture, engineering, construction and public safety.
In addition to the reorganization of the Company’s structure, as part of our strategic planning process, we also evaluated our hardware product portfolio and the operations of certain of our recent acquisitions. As a result of this evaluation, we are integrated into larger componentssimplifying our hardware product portfolio, ceasing to sell certain products and systems.evaluating whether or not we will divest or shut down the related operations.
We performed our annual goodwill and intangible asset impairment test in December 2019 in connection with the preparation of our financial statements for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2019.As a result of this test, we recorded an impairment charge of $35.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2019, which included $21.2 million in goodwill, $10.5 million in intangible assets associated with recent acquisitions, $1.4 million in intangible assets related to capitalized patents and $2.1 million in other asset write-downs.See Note 7, “Goodwill” and Note 8, “Intangible Assets” to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information. We also recorded a charge of $12.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2019, increasing our reserve for excess and obsolete inventory, based on our analysis of our inventory reserves in connection with our strategy to simplify our hardware product portfolio and cease selling certain products.
In addition to the implementation of our new strategic plan, on February 14, 2020, our Board of Directors approved a global restructuring plan (the “Restructuring Plan”), which is intended to support our strategic plan in an effort to improve operating performance and ensure that we are appropriately structured and resourced to deliver sustainable value to our shareholders and customers.Key activities under the Restructuring Plan include a continued focus on efficiency and cost-saving efforts, which includes decreasing total headcount by approximately 500 employees upon the completion of the Restructuring Plan.
These activities are expected to be substantially completed by the end of 2021.We estimate that the Restructuring Plan will reduce gross annual pre-tax expenses by approximately $40 million, to be realized in the fourth quarter of 2020 on an annualized basis.We estimate that the implementation of the Restructuring Plan will result in pre-tax charges of approximately $26 million to $36 million, which are in addition to the pre-tax charges of approximately $49 million recorded in the fourth quarter of 2019 in connection with the implementation of our new strategic plan. We expect $18 million to $22 million of these additional charges to be in the form of cash charges. Actual results, including the costs of the Restructuring Plan, may differ materially from our expectations, resulting in our inability to realize the expected benefits of the Restructuring Plan and our new strategic plan and negatively impacting our ability to execute our future plans and strategies, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Industry Background
We believe four principal forces drive the need for our products and services: 1) the widespread use by manufacturers of CAD in product development, which shortens product cycles; 2) the adoption by manufacturers of quality standards such as Six Sigma and ISO 9001 (and its offshoot QS 9000), which stress the measurement of every step in a manufacturing process to reduce or eliminate defects; 3) the inability of traditional measurement devices to address many manufacturing problems such as throughput, efficiency and accuracy, especially with respect to large components for products such as automobiles, aircraft, heavy dutyheavy-duty construction equipment and factory retrofits; and 4) the growing demand to capture and synthesize large volumes of three-dimensional3D data for modeling, analysis and analysis.simulation.
CAD improves the manufacturing process. The creation of physical products involves the processes of design, engineering, production, and measurement and quality inspection. These basic processes have been profoundly affected by the computer hardware and software revolution that began in the 1980s. CAD software was developed to automate the design process, providing manufacturers with computerized 3D design capability and shortening the time between design changes. Today, most manufacturers use some form of CAD software to create designs and engineering specifications for new products and to quantify and modify designs and specifications for existing products. While manufacturers previously designed their products to remain in production for longer periods of time, current manufacturing practices must accommodate more frequent product introductions and modifications, while satisfying more stringent quality and safety standards. Assembly fixtures and measurement tools must be linked to the CAD design to enable production to keep up with the rate of design change.
Quality standards dictate measurement to reduce defects. QS 9000 is the name given to the Quality System requirements of the automotive industry developed by Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V. (formerly Chrysler Corporation), Ford Motor Company, General Motors Company and major truck manufacturers. Companies registered under QS 9000 are considered to have higher standards and better quality products. Six Sigma is a set of quality standards that embodies the principles of total quality management, focused on measuring results and reducing product or service failure rates to 3.4 per million. All aspects of a Six Sigma company’s infrastructure must be analyzed and, if necessary, restructured to increase revenues and raise customer satisfaction levels. The all-encompassing nature of these and other quality standards has resulted in manufacturers measuring every aspect of their processes, including stages of product assembly that may never have been measured before, in part, because of the lack of suitable measurement equipment.
Traditional products do not measure up. A significant aspect of the manufacturing process entails measurement and quality inspection. Historically, manufacturers have measured and inspected products using hand-measurement tools such as scales, calipers, micrometers and plumb lines for simple measuring tasks, test (or check) fixtures for certain large manufactured products, and traditional (or fixed) coordinate measurement machines (“CMM”CMMs”) for objects that require higher precision measurement. However, the broader utility of each of these measurement methods is limited.
Although hand-measurement tools are often appropriate for simple geometric measurements, including hole diameters or length and width of a rectangular component, their use for complex part measurements, such as the fender of a car, is limited. Also, these devices do not allow for the measurements to be directly compared electronically to the CAD model of the part. Test fixtures (customized fixed tools used to make comparative measurements of complex production parts to “master parts”) are relatively expensive and must be reworked or discarded each time a dimensional change is made in the part being measured. In addition, these manual measuring devices do not permit the manufacturer to electronically compare the dimensions of an object with its CAD model.
Conventional CMMs are generally large, fixed-base machines that provide very high levels of precision and provide a link to the CAD model of the object being measured. However, fixed-base CMMs require that the object being measured be brought to the CMM and fit within the CMM’s measurement grid. As manufactured subassemblies increase in size and become integrated into even larger assemblies, they become less transportable, thus diminishing the utility of a conventional CMM. Consequently, manufacturers must continue to use hand-measurement tools, or expensive customized test fixtures, to measure large or unconventionally shaped objects. In addition, some parts or assemblies are not easily accessible and cannot be measured using traditional devices.
The market demands three-dimensional3D data. Various factors contribute to market demand for FAROour products and services. Conventional surveying equipment is limited to single-point measurements and does not have the capacity to capture and analyze large volumes of 3D data. As data requirements for construction, civil engineering and public safety applications become more complex, single-point measurement devices will become increasingly more difficult to utilize in those applications.
Escalating global competition has created a demand for higher quality products with shorter life cycles. Customers require more rapid design, greater control of the manufacturing process, tools to compare components to their CAD specifications, the ability to precisely measure components that cannot be measured or inspected by conventional devices, and the ability to capture and analyze large volumes of three-dimensional3D data. Moreover, they increasingly require measurement capabilities to be integrated into manufacturing processes and to be available on the factory floor. These changing demands have contributed to the demand for FARO’sour products and services.
Business Segments and Markets
In 2016, we reorganized our business to align our sales, marketing, and product management to five specific vertical markets and better redefine our end market applications. In accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, vertical markets that do not meet the criteria to be a reportable segment are aggregated into one “Other” segment; therefore, we reorganized into three reporting segments encompassing our various applications and product lines: Factory Metrology, Construction BIM-CIM and Other. Our segments are distinguished by the applications they serve. Each segment is responsible for its own product management, sales, strategy and financial performance. Information regarding our net sales and profit by segment, as well as a reconciliation of total segment profit to income from operations, is set forth in Note 16 to the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Total assets are not allocated to a particular segment or segments.
Factory Metrology. The Factory Metrology segment provides solutions for manual and automated measurement and inspection in an industrial or manufacturing environment. Applications include alignment, part inspection, dimensional analysis, first article inspection, incoming and in-process inspection, machine calibration, non-contact inspection, robot calibration, tool building and set-up, and assembly guidance.
Construction BIM-CIM. The Construction BIM-CIM segment provides solutions for as-built data capturing and 3D visualization in building information modeling and construction information management applications, allowing our customers in the architecture, engineering and construction markets to quickly and accurately extract 2D and 3D measurement points. Applications include as-built documentation, construction monitoring, surveying, asset and facility management, and heritage preservation.
Other. The Other segment includes our Product Design, Public Safety Forensics and 3D Machine Vision (formerly known as 3D Solutions) operating segments. Our Product Design operating segment provides advanced 3D solutions to assist in the engineering or design of a movable object, enabling a full digital workflow for applications that include reverse engineering and virtual simulation. Our Public Safety Forensics operating segment provides solutions to public safety officials and professionals to capture environmental or situational scenes in 2D and 3D for crime, crash and fire scene investigations and environmental safety evaluations. Our 3D Machine Vision operating segment provides solutions to customers who require customized 3D measurement and realization solutions not otherwise addressed by our off-the-shelf product offerings.
All operating segments that do not meet the criteria to be reportable segments are aggregated in the Other reporting segment and have been combined based on the aggregation criteria and quantitative thresholds in accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 280. Each of our reporting segments employs consistent accounting policies.
Recent Acquisitions
Instrument Associates, LLC. In April 2017, we acquired Instrument Associates, LLC d/b/a Nutfield Technology (“Nutfield”), located in Hudson, New Hampshire. Nutfield specializes in the design and manufacture of advanced galvanometer-based optical scanners, scan heads and laser kits. The acquisition supports our long-term strategy to expand our presence in key markets and improve our existing product lines with innovative technology.
MWF-Technology GmbH. In December 2016, we acquired MWF-Technology GmbH (“MWF”), located near Frankfurt, Germany. MWF is an innovator in mobile augmented reality solutions, with technology that enables large, complex 3D CAD data to be transferred to a tablet device and then used for mobile visualization and comparison to real world conditions. This enables real time, actionable manufacturing insight for in-process inspection, assembly, guidance and positioning.
Laser Projection Technologies, Inc. In August 2016, we acquired Laser Projection Technologies, Inc. (“LPT”), located in Londonderry, New Hampshire. LPT specializes in laser projection and measurement systems used throughout manufacturing environments around the globe to maximize productivity and efficiency. The acquisition enhances our portfolio of 3D measurement solutions and supports our long-term strategy to expand our presence in key markets.
BuildIT Software & Solutions Ltd. In July 2016, we acquired BuildIT Software & Solutions Ltd. (“BuildIT”), located in Montreal, Canada. BuildIT specializes in process-configurable 3D metrology software solutions with hardware agnostic interfaces. The acquisition provides customers greater software options to use in a variety of applications to reduce inspection and assembly times and increase productivity.
FARO Products
FaroArm.FaroArm®. The FaroArm® is a combination of a portable, six or seven-axis, articulated measurement arm, a computer, and CAM2® software programs, which are described below under “FARO Software” and are primarily sold to customers in the Factory Metrologyautomotive, aerospace, metal and Product Design segments.machine fabrication markets.
•Articulated Arm – The articulated arm is comprised of three major joints, each of which may consist of one, two or three axes of motion. The articulated arm is available in a variety of sizes, configurations and precision levels suitable for a broad range of applications. To take a measurement, the operator simply touches the object to be measured with a probe at the end of the arm and presses a button. Data can be captured at either individual points or a series of points. Optical encoders, located at each of the joints of the arm, measure the angles at those joints, and thisjoints. This rotational measurement data is transmitted to an on-board controller that converts the arm angles to precise locations in 3D space using “xyz” position coordinates and “ijk” orientation coordinates.
In August 2018, we released the FARO 8-Axis FaroArm® which is a comprehensive solution that combines either the portable Quantum FaroArm®, Quantum ScanArm or Design ScanArm® portfolio products with a functionally integrated, yet physically separate, rotating platform that functions as the 8th axis.
•Computer – We pre-install our CAM2® software primarily on either a notebook or desktop styledesktop-style computer, depending on the customer’s need, and the measurement arm, computer and installed software are sold as a system. We purchase the computers sold with our products from various suppliers.
FARO ScanArm.ScanArm®. The FARO ScanArm® is a FaroArm equipped with a combination of a hard probe (like that in the FaroArm)FaroArm®) and a non-contact laser line probe. This product provides our customers with the ability to measure products without touching them and offers a seven-axis contact/non-contact measurement device with a fully integrated laser scanner.them. The ScanArm® is used for contact and non-contact measurement applications, including inspection, cloud-to-CAD comparison, rapid prototyping, reverse engineering and 3D modeling. This product is primarily sold to customers in the Factory Metrologyautomotive, aerospace, metal and Productmachine fabrication markets.
FARO Design segments.
ScanArm®2.5C and FARO Gage.PrizmTM. The FARO GageDesign ScanArm®2.5C is a smaller, higher-accuracy version of the FaroArm that is sold as a combination of an articulated arm device with a computer and software. The FARO Gage is also distinguished from the FaroArm by the special mounting features and software unique tocolor-capable, portable lightweight 3D ScanArm. Using the FARO Gage. ThePrizmTM full-color Laser Line Probe with 3D design and modeling software, the FARO Gage is targeted at machine toolsDesign ScanArm®2.5C delivers high-resolution, color point-cloud data, enabling more insight into object design and bench tops around machine tools, where basic measurementscreation.
FARO Laser Tracker.TrackerTM. The FARO Laser TrackerTM combines a portable, large-volume laser measurement tool, a computer, and CAM2® software programs, representing a product offering primarily sold to customers in the Factory Metrology segment.automotive, aerospace, metal and machine fabrication markets.
•Laser Tracker Vantage – The FARO Laser Tracker Vantage utilizes an ultra-precisea laser beam to measurefor ultra-precise measurement of objects of up to 80 meters. It enables manufacturing, engineering, and quality control professionals to measure and inspect large parts, machine tools and other large objects on-site and in-process.
In January 2017, we released the•6DoF FARO VantageS and Laser Tracker – Together with the hand-held 6Probe, a fully-integrated hand-held probe, the 6DoF FARO VantageE Laser Trackers. The VantageS is intended for short-to-long range measurement applications of up to 80 meters, while the VantageE supports short-to-medium range applications of up to 25 meters.
Laser Tracker IONexpands the capabilities of large volume measurement by allowing users to access hidden, hard-to-reach locations by probing and scanning.
•Computer – The FARO Laser Tracker ION is an interferometer (IFM)-based measurement system that provides the high accuracy and range to complete measurement tasks, such as in-line measurements, high-speed dynamic measurements, or high-accuracy machine calibration.
Computer – The FARO Laser TrackerTM includes a notebook or desktop styledesktop-style computer, depending on the customer’s requirements, that includes the pre-installed CAM2® Software.
FARO Cobalt Array Imager.Laser Projector. The FARO Cobalt Array Imager is a metrology-grade structured light imager that utilizes blue light technology to capture millions of high resolution 3D coordinate measurements in seconds. FARO Cobalt’s versatility supports a variety of deployment options including rotary table, robot, industrial inspection cellsTracerM and multiple imager arrays. This technology is used in quality control to improve product quality and reduce scrap, as well as for reverse engineering and rapid manufacturing. This product is primarily sold in the Factory Metrology segment.
FARO Laser Projector. The FARO TracerMSI accurately projectsproject a laser line onto a surface or object, providing a virtual template that operators and assemblers can use to quickly and accurately position components with confidence.components. The laser template is created using a 3D CAD model that enables the system to visually project a laser outline of parts, reference points, or areas of interest. The result is a virtual and collaborative 3D template to streamline a wide range of assembly and production applications. This product is primarily sold to customers in the Factory Metrology segment.aerospace and AEC markets.
FARO Focus. The FARO Focus laser scanner utilizes laser technology to measure and collect a cloud of data points, allowing for the detailed and precise three-dimensional3D rendering of an object or an area as large as an industrial facility. This technology is currently used for factory planning, facility life-cycle management, quality control, forensic analysis and capturing large volumes of three-dimensional3D data. The FARO Focus simplifies modeling, reduces project time and maintains or increases the detail, identifies the colors and measures the dimensions of surrounding structures. The resulting data is used with major CAD systems or FARO’sour own proprietary FARO SCENE, PointSense,As-BuiltTM, BuildIT, and FARO Zone.Zone, which are described below. This product is primarily sold to customers in the Construction BIM-CIMAEC and Public Safety Forensics segments.public safety markets.
FARO Scanner Freestyle3DX.ScanPlan. The FARO Scanner Freestyle3DXScanPlan is a handheld scannermapper that quickly documents rooms, structures and objects in 3D and creates high-definition point clouds. The applications of the FARO Scanner Freestyle3DX include architecture, construction, industrial production and forensics.captures two-dimensional (“2D”) floor plans. The FARO Scanner Freestyle3DX’s durable carbon fiber design equips the user with a versatileScanPlan performs real-time capturing and ergonomic tooldiagramming of as-built floor plans of buildings for performing accurate scanning in confined spaces.threat assessment, pre-incident planning and fire protection engineering. The FARO Scanner Freestyle3DX can be used independently or as a complement to the FARO Focus. The FARO Scanner Freestyle3DXScanPlan comes with twoFARO Zone 2D software applications in addition to FARO’s proprietary SCENE software: SCENE Capture, which is installed onturn any floor plan map into a tablet computer to recordcompleted diagram by adding doors, stairs, hazardous materials, notes and visualize the capturing of 3D data, and SCENE Process, which processes the captured 3D data.dimensions, among others. This product is primarily sold to customers in the Construction BIM-CIMAEC and Public Safety Forensics segments.public safety markets.
FARO Software. We provide a family of proprietary CAD-based measurement and laser scanner software used with our measurement and scanning devices.
•CAM2 Measure 10® 2019 allows customers to complete measurement jobs quickly and gives customers the freedom to measure as required by the application, thereby improving every process where measuring is needed.
application.
•CAM2 SmartInspect is our CAM2 solution for measuring geometry and building dimensions. The software allows customers to quickly measure geometric features and report dimensions for control.
•BuildITis a CAD-to-part inspection software that enables quick and easy dimensional verification of manufactured parts and assemblies for tool building, assembly, alignment, process automation, reverse engineering and quality control. BuildIT’s advanced analysis and reporting capabilities combine measurement data from multiple sources to produce detailed graphical and textual reports that are used to quickly identify manufacturing and production trends. With both numerical and graphical feedback of real-time deviations, BuildIT allows users to position parts with micrometer accuracy for high-precision assembly and alignment applications.
•FARO SCENE software combines ease-of-use, networking, and an enhanced 3D experience to deliver a complete scan processing solution. With SCENE, customers can display, analyze, administer and edit 3D measurements in point clouds.
•FARO Zone software makes diagramming and pre-planning easier for law enforcement officers, firefighters and loss control engineers by allowing the users who need to draw site plans or crash or crime scene diagrams to be able to do so in a fast and efficient manner.
•FARO As-BuiltTM software products enable and simplify the use of real world objects in CAD applications. Primarily serving the surveying and architecture, engineering and construction spaces, the offering allows the user to integrate 3D laser scan data with CAD environments.
| |
• | PointSense software products enable and simplify the use of real world objects in CAD applications. Primarily serving the surveying and architecture, engineering and construction spaces, the offering allows the user to integrate 3D laser scan data with CAD environments. PointSense offerings include PointSense for Revit® (a registered trademark of Autodesk), PointSense Building, PointSense Heritage, PointSense Plant, and PointSense Pro.
|
| |
• | FARO RayTracerTM software streamlines processes for factory workers and enables the projection of 3D templates. Primarily serving manufacturing environments, the offering can be used to establish databases, manage their components, configure jobs and control parameters, edit projection data and reference tool data. The FARO RayTracerTM offerings include RayTracerTM Administrator and RayTracerTM Operator.
|
Warranties, Software Maintenance and Services. We warrant our products against defects in design, materials and workmanship for one year. To support our product lines, we also separately sell extended warrantieshardware service plans that typically range from less thanone year to three years, software maintenance renewals that typically range from one year to three years, and comprehensive support, training and technology consulting services to our customers.
Customers
Our sales are diversified across a broad number of over 15,00014,000 customers worldwide in our Factory Metrology, Construction BIM-CIM, Product Design, Public Safety Forensics,a range of metrology, reverse engineering, factory automation, building information modeling, public safety and 3D Machine Vision verticalother applications. Our metrology, reverse engineering and factory automation applications are purchased primarily by customers in the automotive and aerospace markets and a diverse array of manufacturing customers from small machine shops to large industrial manufacturers. Applications are used by these customers for alignment, part inspection, dimensional analysis, first article inspection, incoming and in-process inspection, machine calibration, non-contact inspection, robot calibration, tool building and setup, and assembly guidance. Our building information modeling applications are purchased primarily by customers in the AEC markets. Applications are used by these customers for as-built documentation, construction monitoring, surveying, asset and facility management, and heritage preservation. Our public safety applications are purchased primarily by law enforcement agencies, private investigators, and forensic experts and are used for capturing environmental or situational scenes, crash and fire scene investigations and environmental safety evaluations. Our ten largest customers by revenue represented an aggregate of approximately 4.2%4.0% of our total sales in 2017.2019. No customer represented more than 1.0% of our sales in 2017.2019.
Sales and Marketing
We conductsell our sales and marketing efforts on a vertical basis. Each vertical has its own sales and marketing team coordinated by our Lake Mary headquarters. Geographically, we have operations in three main regions around the world: Americas, Europe/Middle East/Africa (“EMEA”) and Asia-Pacific. The regional headquarters for the Americas, which is also our global headquarters, is located in Lake Mary, Florida; the EMEA regional headquarters is located in Stuttgart, Germany; and the regional headquarters for the Asia-Pacific region is located in Singapore. Each of these regional sales and marketing organizations support each of our reporting segments. As of December 31, 2017, we employed 705 sales and marketing specialists globally.
We sell most of our products worldwide through direct sales representationand service offices, as well as third-party distributors and resellers. We have direct sales personnel in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Our sales and marketing efforts use a process of integrated lead qualification and sales demonstration. Once a customer opportunity is identified, we employ a team-based sales approach involving inside and outside sales personnel who are supported by application engineers.personnel. Each team has the ability to sell multiple product lines. We employ a variety of marketing techniques to promote brand awareness and customer identification.
Information regarding our net As of December 31, 2019, we employed 804 sales and long-lived assets by geographic region is set forth in Note 16 to the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
marketing specialists globally.
Research and Development
We believe that our future success depends, in part, on our ability to maintain what we believe to be our technological leadership, which will require ongoing enhancements of both our hardware and software products and the development of new applications and products that provide 3D measurement and imaging solutions. The field of 3D measurement and imaging continues to expand, and new technologies and applications will be essential to competing in this market. Accordingly, we intend to continue to make substantial investments in the development of new technologies, the commercialization of new products that build on our existing technological base, and the enhancement and development of additional applications for our products.
Our research and development efforts are directed primarily at enhancing the functional adaptability of our current products and developing new and innovative products that respond to specific requirements of the emerging market for 3D measurement and imaging and realization systems. Our engineering development efforts will continue to focus on enhancing the mechanical hardware, electronics, and software in our existing products and developing new products for the CAM2 market. Additionally, certain of our acquisitions are intended, in whole or in part, to further the development of technologies which, on a risk adjusted basis, are better to be acquired than developed internally by us.solutions. Research and development activities, especially with respect to new products and technologies, are subject to significant risks, and there can be no assurance that any of our research and development activities will be completed successfully or on schedule, or, if completed, will be commercially accepted.
At December 31, 2017,2019, we employed 229242 scientists and technicians in our research and development efforts. Research and development expenses were approximately $35.4$44.2 million in 2017,2019, compared to $30.1$46.1 million in 20162018 and $26.7$41.1 million in 2015.2017.
Intellectual Property
We own approximately 860640 patents and pending patent applications worldwide, which generally expire on a rolling basis between 20182020 and 2040.2042. We also own approximately 7383 trademark registrations worldwide, with 4 pending trademark applications.
Our success and ability to maintain a competitive position depends, in large part, on our ability to protect our intellectual property. We rely on a combination of contractual provisions and trade secret laws to protect our proprietary information. However, there can be no assurance that the steps taken by us to protect our trade secrets and proprietary information will be sufficient to prevent misappropriation of our proprietary information or preclude third-party development of similar intellectual property.
Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products or to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. We intend to vigorously defend our proprietary rights against infringement by third parties. However, policing unauthorized use of our products is difficult, particularly in foreign countries, and we may be unable to determine the extent, if any, to which unauthorized uses of our products exist. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States.
We do not believe that any of our products infringe on the valid, proprietary rights of third parties. There can be no assurance, however, that third parties will not claim infringement by us with respect to current or future products. Any suchSuch claims, with or without merit, could be time consuming, result in costly litigation, cause product shipment delays or require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements, which could have a material adverse effect upon our business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, such royalty or licensing agreements, if required, may not be available on terms acceptable to us, if at all.
Manufacturing and Assembly
Manufacturing consists primarily of assembling and integrating components and subassemblies purchased from suppliers into finished products. The primary components, which include machined parts and electronic circuit boards, are produced by subcontractors according to our specifications. Products are assembled, calibrated and tested for accuracy and functionality before shipment. We perform limited in-house circuit board assembly and component part machining. Typically, we enter into purchase commitments for manufacturing components to cover production requirements for 60 to 120 days. We have entered, and may continue to enter, into longer agreements to purchase sufficient inventory to satisfy warranty commitments or to ensure adequate component availability. To date, we have not experienced any significant difficulty in locating and obtaining the materials necessary to fulfill our production schedules.
Our manufacturing, engineering, and design headquarters have been registered to the ISO 9001 standard since July 1998. Semi-annual surveillance audits have documented continuous improvement to this multinational standard. Currently, our manufacturing sites in Lake Mary, Florida; Exton, Pennsylvania; Stuttgart, Germany; Schaffhausen, Switzerland; and Singapore are jointly registered to ISO 9001. Our FARO Laser TrackerTM, andFaroArm®, FARO Gage, and FARO Cobalt Array Imager products are all registered to ISO 17025:2005. We continue to examine our scope of registration as our business evolves, and we have chosen English as the standard business language for our operations.
Our efforts to register our manufacturing, engineering and design headquarters to the ISO 9001 standard in concert with the ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management System Certification verifies our commitment to quality through an internationally recognized standard. Additionally, we take a global approach to ISO 17025:2005 regarding the recognition of the Competence of Calibration and Testing Laboratories, seeking to have all locations registered with similar scopes of accreditation and capabilities for the products generated and serviced.
We manufacture our FaroArm®, FARO ScanArm®, and FARO GageScanArm® products in our manufacturing facility located in Switzerland for customer orders from EMEA,Europe, the Middle East and Africa (“EMEA”), in our manufacturing facility located in Singapore for customer orders from the Asia-Pacific region, and in our manufacturing facility located in Florida for customer orders from the Americas. We manufacture our FARO Focus in our manufacturing facilities located in Germany and Switzerland for customer orders from EMEA and the Asia-Pacific region, and in our manufacturing facility located in Pennsylvania for customer orders from the Americas. We manufacture our FARO Freestyle3DX products in our facility located in Germany. We manufacture our FARO Laser TrackerTM, FARO Cobalt Array Imager and our FARO Laser Projector products in our facility located in Pennsylvania. We expect all of our existing manufacturing facilities to have the production capacity necessary to support our volume requirements during 2018.2020.
Competition
Our measurement systems compete in the broad and highly competitive market for measurement devices for manufacturing and industrial applications, which, in addition to portable articulated arms, laser trackers, 3D imaging and laser scanner products, consist of fixed-base CMMs, templates and go/no-go gages, check fixtures, handheld measurement tools, and various categories of surveying equipment. In the FARO Gage product line, we compete with a number of manufacturers of handheld measurement tools and fixed-base CMMs, including some large, well-established companies. In the FaroArm®, FARO ScanArm®, FARO Laser TrackerTM, and FARO Focus product lines, we compete primarily with Hexagon Manufacturing Intelligence, a division of Hexagon AB; Automated Precision, Inc.; Artec Europe, S.a.r.l.; Leica Geosystems Inc.,AG, a division of Hexagon AB; and Trimble Inc. In the FARO Cobalt Array Imager product lines, we compete primarily with Carl Zeiss Optotechnik GmbH, GOM GmbH, Hexagon Manufacturing Intelligence, and Nikon Metrology, Inc., a division of Nikon Inc. In the FARO Laser Projector product line, we compete primarily with ViRTEK,Virtek Vision International, a division of Gerber Technology LLC. We also compete in these product lines with a number of other smaller companies. We compete on the basis of technical innovation, product performance, quality and price with respect to all of our products.
We will be required to make continued investments in technology and product development to maintain and extend the technological advantage that we believe we currently have over our competition. However, we cannot be certain that our technology or our product development efforts will allow us to successfully compete as the industry evolves. As the market for our measurement systems expands, additional competition may emerge, and our existing and future competitors may commit more resources to the markets in which we participate.
Government Regulation
Our operations are subject to numerous governmental laws and regulations, including those governing antitrust and competition, the environment, collection, recycling, treatment and disposal of covered electronic products and components, import and export of products, currency conversions and repatriation, taxation of foreign earnings, and earnings of expatriate personnel, andthe use of local employees and suppliers. Our foreign operations are subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or FCPA, and similar foreign anti-corruption laws, which makes illegal any payments to government officials or government employees that are intended to induce their influence to assist us or to gain any improper advantage for us. We operate in certain regions in the Middle East, Africa, Latin America and Asia-Pacific that are more prone to risk under these anti-corruption laws.
Manufacturers of electrical goods are subject to the European Union’s RoHS2 and WEEE directives, which took effect during 2006. RoHS2 prohibits the use of lead, mercury and certain other specified substances in electronics products, and WEEE makes producers of electrical goods financially responsible for specified collection, recycling, treatment, and disposal of covered electronic products and components. Parallel initiatives are being proposed in other jurisdictions, including several states in the United States and China. We currently hold RoHS2 and WEEE registration, and we believe we are in compliance with such directives of the European Union.
In addition, a number of data protection laws impact, or may impact, the manner in which we collect, process and transfer personal data. Most notably, the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), which went into effect in May 2018, expands data protection compliance obligations and authorizes significantly increased fines for noncompliance, requiring additional compliance resources and efforts on our part. Further, a number of other regions where we do business, including the United States, the Asia-Pacific region and Latin America, have enacted or are considering new data protection regulations that may impact our business activities that involve the processing of personal data. Compliance with enhanced data protection laws requires additional resources and efforts, and noncompliance with personal data protection regulations could result in increased regulatory enforcement and significant monetary fines and costs.
We currently sell our products and related services to the U.S. Government (the “Government”) under two General Services Administration (“GSA”) Federal Supply Schedule contracts (the “GSA Contracts”). The Government, as well as state and local governments, can typically terminate or modify their contracts with us either at their discretion or if we default by failing to perform under the terms of the applicable contract, which could expose us to liability and impede our ability to compete in the future for contracts and orders. Our sales to the Government under the GSA Contracts represented approximately 4.0% of our total sales for 2019.
Backlog and Seasonality
At December 31, 2017,2019, we had orders representing approximately $18.0$28.0 million in sales outstanding, of which $6.8$8.0 million related to services that we expect to deliver within one year. The product-related outstanding orders as of December 31, 20172019 were $11.2$20.0 million, of which $6.4$9.4 million were shipped by February 16, 2018.17, 2020. As of February 16, 2018,17, 2020, we had orders representing approximately $20.5$25.1 million in sales outstanding, inclusive of 20172019 open and undelivered orders, of which $6.3$7.8 million related to service orders and $14.2$17.4 million were product-related orders. We believe that substantially alla significant portion of the outstanding product-related orders as of February 16, 201817, 2020 will be shipped during 2018.2020. At December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017, we had orders representing approximately $13.4$17.5 million and $9.1$18.0 million in sales outstanding, respectively.
We typically experience greater order volume during the fourth quarter, as customers spend the remaining balances of their capital expenditure budgets.
Employees
At December 31, 2017,2019, we had 1,6691,818 full-time employees, consisting of 705804 sales and marketing professionals, 291308 customer service/training/application engineering specialists, 246250 production and supply chain staff, 229242 research and development staff, and 198214 administrative staff. We are not a party to any collective bargaining agreements and believe our employee relations are satisfactory. Management believes that our future growth and success will depend in part on our ability to retain and continue to attract highly-skilled personnel. We anticipate that we will be able to obtain the additional personnel required to satisfy our staffing requirements during 2018.
Available Information
We make available, free of charge on our Internet website at http://www.faro.com, our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC. You can find these reports on our website at www.faro.com by first clicking “Investor Relations” and then “SEC Filings.” We have included our website address throughout this filing as textual references only. The information on, or accessible through, our website is not a part of, or incorporated into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
These reports may also be obtained at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room is available by calling the SEC at (800) SEC-0330. You may also access this information at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. This site contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.FACTORS
The statements under this heading describe the most significant risks to our business identified by management and should be considered carefully in conjunction with the discussion in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in our Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K before deciding to invest in, or retain, shares of our common stock.
Any of the following risks and uncertainties could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, liquidity, and financial condition. These are not the only risks we face. Our operations could also be affected by additional factors that are not presently known by us or by factors that we currently do not consider to be material to our business.
Competitors may develop products that make our products obsolete or less competitive.
The CAM23D measurement and imaging solutions market is characterized by rapid technological change. Competitors may develop new or improved products, processes or technologies that may make our products obsolete or less competitive.
As a result, our success depends, in part, on our ability to maintain our technological advantage by developing new products and applications and enhancing our existing products, which can be complex and time-consuming and require substantial investment. Significant delays in new product releases or difficulties in developing new products could adversely affect our business and results of operations. We can provide no assurance that we will be able to adapt to evolving markets and technologies or maintain our technological advantage.
Our financial performance is dependent on the conditions of various industries, including the automotive, aerospace, and heavy equipmentheavy-equipment industries, which have from time to time experienced, and may again experience, significant disruptions in the economic environment.
A significant portion of our sales are to manufacturers in the automotive, aerospace, and heavy equipment industries. We are dependent upon the continued viability and financial stability of our customers in these industries, which are highly cyclical and dependent upon the general health of the economy and consumer spending.
Because a significant portion of our revenues and expenses are denominated in foreign currencies, we face significant exposure to foreign exchange rate risk.
Our results of operations are affected by fluctuations in exchange rates, which hashave caused, and may continue toin the future cause, significant fluctuations in our quarterly and annual results of operations. Fluctuations in exchange rates may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition and could result in potentially significant foreign exchange gains and losses. Additionally, currency fluctuations could require us to increase prices to foreign customers, which could result in lower net sales by us to those customers. If we do not adjust the prices for our products in response to unfavorable currency fluctuations, we could be forced to sell our products at a lower margin or at a net loss. To the extent that the percentage of our non-U.S. dollar revenues derived from international sales increases in the future, our exposure to risks associated with fluctuations in foreign exchange rates will increase.
We may be unable to recognize the anticipated benefits of our Restructuring Plan and our new strategic plan.
On February 14, 2020, our Board of Directors approved a global Restructuring Plan, which is intended to support our new strategic plan in an effort to improve operating performance and ensure that we are appropriately structured and resourced to deliver sustainable value to our shareholders and customers. Key activities under the Restructuring Plan include a continued focus on efficiency and cost-saving efforts, which includes decreasing total headcount by approximately 500 employees upon completion of the Restructuring Plan. In addition, as part of our new strategic plan, we have reassessed and redefined our go-to-market strategy, refocused our marketing engagement with our customers and re-evaluated our hardware product portfolio and have begun to focus on other organizational optimization efforts, including the simplification of our overly complex management structure. These activities are expected to be substantially completed by the end of 2021. Actual results, including the costs of the Restructuring Plan, may differ materially from our expectations, resulting in our inability to realize the expected benefits of the Restructuring Plan and our new strategic plan and negatively impacting our ability to execute our future plans and strategies, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Product failures or product availability and performance issues could result in increased warranty costs and delays in new product introductions and enhancements, and could adversely affect our business and financial condition.
We regularly introduce new products and enhance existing products. The impact of new product introductions, including the costs associated with new product introductions, such as product development, marketing, assembly line start-up costs and low introductory period production volumes, and manufacturing inefficiencies associated with new product introductions could have an adverse effect on our business and financial condition. Failures in, or performance issues impacting, our new or existing products could result in increased warranty costs, product recall costs, delays in new product introductions or existing product enhancements, and a loss of sales and customers, which would have an adverse effect on our business and financial condition. The supply of raw materials for a new or existing product could be delayed or constrained, or a key vendor could delay shipments, which may decrease product availability, causing a loss of sales and customers.
Our growth depends on the ability of our products to attain broad market acceptance.
The market for traditional fixed-base CMMs, check fixtures, handheld measurement tools, and surveying equipment is mature. Part of our strategy is to continue to displace these traditional measurement devices. Displacing traditional measurement devices and achieving broad market acceptance for our products requires significant effort to convince customers to reevaluate their historical measurement procedures and methodologies.
The potential size and growth rate of the CAM2 market is uncertain and difficult to quantify. If the CAM2 market does not continue to expand or does not expand as quickly as we anticipate, we may not be able to grow our sales, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
We market eight closely interdependent hardware products (FaroArm®, FARO ScanArm®, FARO Gage, FARO Laser Tracker™, FARO Laser Projector, FARO Cobalt Array Imager, FARO Focus and FARO Scanner Freestyle3DX)ScanPlan) and related software for use in measurement, inspection, and high density surveying applications. Substantially all of our revenues are currently derived from sales of these products and software, and we plan to continue our business strategy of focusing on the software-driven, 3D measurement and inspectionimaging solutions market. Consequently, our financial performance will depend, in large part, on computer-based measurement, inspection and high density surveying products achieving broad market acceptance. If our products cannot attain broad market acceptance, we will not grow as anticipated and may be required to make increased expenditures on research and development for new applications or new products.
Increases in the cost of raw materials or components used in our products could negatively impact our business and profitability.
Our products contain various raw materials, including steel, steel byproducts, aluminum and aluminum byproducts. We use raw materials directly in manufacturing and in components that we purchase from our suppliers. These raw materials are subject to extensive laws, governmental regulations and policies, including tariffs and other import restrictions. Changes to the laws, governmental regulations and policies governing these raw materials, including tariffs and other import restrictions, have increased and could continue to increase the cost of such raw materials and, correspondingly, the cost of manufacturing our products. If the costs of our raw materials further increase, whether due to changes in laws, governmental regulations or policies or for other reasons, we may not be able to pass on these costs to our customers, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Even in the event that increased costs can be passed through to our customers, our gross margin percentages would decline. Additionally, our suppliers are also subject to fluctuations in the prices of raw materials and may attempt to pass all or a portion of such increases on to us. In the event they are successful in doing so, our margins would decline.
Changes in tariffs and other export regulations could increase the cost of our products sold to our international customers, which could negatively impact our sales and profitability.
Our international sales operations are subject to extensive laws, governmental regulations and policies, including but not limited to tariffs and other export regulations. Changes in export regulations could increase the cost of our products sold as exports to our international customers. If our international customers are not willing to absorb the incremental costs resulting from those tariffs or other export regulations, it could negatively impact our sales to such customers, as well as our profitability.
We may not be able to identify or consummate acquisitions or achieve expected benefits from or effectively integrate acquisitions, which could harm our growth.
Our growth strategy partly depends on our ability to obtain additional technologies, complementary product lines and sales channels through selective acquisitions and strategic investments. We may not be able to identify and successfully negotiate suitable acquisitions, obtain financing for future acquisitions, if necessary, on satisfactory terms or otherwise complete acquisitions in the future. In the past, we have used our stock as consideration for acquisitions. Our common stock may not remain at a price at which it can be used as consideration for acquisitions without diluting our existing shareholders, and potential acquisition candidates may not view our stock attractively.
In addition, realization of the benefits of acquisitions often requires integration of some or all of the sales and marketing, distribution, manufacturing, engineering, software development, customer service, finance and administrative organizations of the acquired companies. The integration of acquisitions demands substantial attention from senior management and the management of the acquired companies. Our recent acquisitions are, and any future acquisitions may be, subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties including:
•the inability to assimilate effectively the operations, products, technologies and personnel of the acquired companies (some of which may be located in diverse geographic regions);
•the inability of the acquired business to meet our performance expectations;
•the inability to maintain uniform standards, controls, procedures and policies;
•the need or obligation to divest portions of the acquired companies; and
•the potential impairment of relationships with customers.
We cannot offer any assurance that we will be able to identify, complete or successfully integrate any suitable acquisitions, that any acquired companies will operate profitably, or that we will realize the expected synergies and other benefits from any acquisition.
The buying process for most of our customers for our measurement products is highly decentralized and typically requires significant time and expense for us to further penetrate the potential market of a specific customer, which may delay our ability to generate additional revenue.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to further penetrate our customer base. During 2017,2019, approximately 85%76% of our revenue was attributable to sales to our existing customers. If we are not able to continue to further penetrate our existing customer base, our future sales may decline. However, most of our customers have a decentralized buying process for measurement devices, and we must spend significant time and resources to increase revenues from a specific customer. For example, we may provide products to only one of our customer’s manufacturing facilities or for a specific product line within a manufacturing facility. We cannot offer any assurance that we will be able to maintain or increase the amount of sales to our existing customers, which could adversely affect our financial results.
OurWe have experienced a significant transition in our executive management team in the last year. Any delay in the integration of our executive management team or our failure to successfully attract and retain qualified personnel could lead tohave an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Our executive management team has gone through a losssignificant transition in the last year, including the hiring of sales or decreased profitability.
The lossa new President and Chief Executive Officer and the hiring of anya new Chief Financial Officer. Any delay in the integration of our current executive officers,management team could affect our ability to develop, implement and execute our business strategies and plans, which could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
In addition, if we fail to successfully attract qualified personnel or to retain our executive management team and other key personnel, could adversely affect our sales, profitability or growth. Moreover, we continueand growth and our ability to rely, in part, on equity awards to attractexecute our business strategies and retainplans could be adversely impacted. Turnover of management could also adversely impact our stock price and our client relationships and could make recruiting for future management positions more difficult. We face competition for qualified personnel, which maycould result in an increase inincreased salaries and other compensation expense.
expenses and could negatively affect our profitability.
Any failure to protect our patents and proprietary rights in the United States and foreign countries could adversely affect our revenues.
Our success depends, in large part, on our ability to obtain and maintain patents and other proprietary rights protection for our processes and products in the United States and other countries. We also rely upon trade secrets, technical know-how and continuing inventions to maintain our competitive position. We seek to protect our technology and trade secrets, in part, by confidentiality agreements with our employees and contractors. However, our employees may breach these agreements;agreements, or our trade secrets may otherwise become known or be independently discovered by inventors. If we are unable to obtain or maintain protection of our patents, trade secrets and other proprietary rights, we may not be able to prevent third parties from using our proprietary rights, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
In addition, despite our efforts to protect our patents and other proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products or to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. Policing unauthorized use of our products is difficult, particularly in foreign countries, and we may be unable to determine the extent, if any, to which unauthorized uses of our products exist. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States.
Our patent protection involves complex legal and technical questions. Our patents may be challenged, narrowed, invalidated or circumvented. Further, we may be able to protect our proprietary rights from infringement by third parties only to the extent that our proprietary processes and products are covered by valid and enforceable patents or are effectively maintained as trade secrets. Furthermore, others may independently develop similar or alternative technologies or design around our patented technologies. Litigation or other proceedings to defend or enforce our intellectual property rights could require us to spend significant time and money, which could have an adverse impact on our financial condition.
Claims from others that we infringed on their intellectual property rights may adversely affect our business and financial condition.
From time to time, we receive notices from others claiming that we infringed on their intellectual property rights. Resolving these claims may require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements on unfavorable terms, require us to stop selling or to redesign affected products, or require us to pay damages. In addition, from time to time, we are involved in intellectual property lawsuits. We could, in the future, incur judgments or enter into settlements of lawsuits and claims that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition. Any litigation or interference proceedings, regardless of their outcome, may be costly and may require significant time and attention of our management and technical personnel.
Our operations are vulnerable to the effects of epidemics, such as the coronavirus, which could materially disrupt our business.
We are vulnerable to the general economic effects of epidemics and other public health crises, including the ongoing coronavirus outbreak that has surfaced in China. Due to the recent outbreak of the coronavirus, there has been a substantial curtailment of business activities, particularly to and from China, and China has also limited the shipment of products in and out of its borders, which could negatively impact our ability to receive products from our China-based suppliers and our ability to ship products to customers in that region. Further, the virus could have a negative impact on operations outside of China, and if it is not contained or otherwise continues, the impact of the epidemic could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We may not be able to achieve financial results within our target goals, and our operating results may fluctuate due to a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control.
Our ability to achieve financial results that are within our goals is subject to a number of factors beyond our control. Moreover, our annual and quarterly operating results have varied significantly in the past and likely will vary significantly in the future. Factors that cause our financial results to fluctuate include, but are not limited to, the following:
•adverse changes in the manufacturing industry and general economic conditions;
•the effectiveness of sales promotions;
•geographic expansion in our regions;
•training and ramp-up time for new sales people;
•investments in strategic sales, product or other initiatives;
•investments in technologies and new products and product enhancements, including costs associated with new development and product introductions, and the timing and market acceptance of new products and product enhancements;
•manufacturing inefficiencies related to new product introductions;
•excess or obsolete inventory, shrinkage or other inventory losses due to product obsolescence, change in demand for our products, scrap or material price changes;
•impairment charges of goodwill or intangible assets;
•expansion of our manufacturing capability;
•the size and timing of customer orders, many of which are received towards the end of a quarter;
•the amount of time that it takes to fulfill orders and ship our products;
•the length of our sales cycle to new customers;
•customer order deferrals in anticipation of new products and product enhancements;
•start-up costs and ramp-up time associated with opening new sales offices outside of the United States;
•variations in our effective income tax rate and difficulty in predicting our effective tax rate on a quarterly and annual basis; and
•litigation and regulatory action brought against us.
Any one or a combination of these factors could adversely affect our annual and quarterly operating results in the future and could cause us to fail to achieve our target financial results.
Future impairments of our goodwill, intangible and long-lived assets could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Because the historical and projected future performance of certain of our recently acquired operations were lower than our expectations, the technologies, intellectual property, know-how and related intangibles are no longer aligned with our go-forward strategies, and due to other initiatives in connection with our new strategic plan, in the fourth quarter of 2019, we recorded an impairment of $35.2 million on our non-current assets, which charge was included in operating expenses. See Note 7, “Goodwill” and Note 8, “Intangible Assets” to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information regarding the impairment. We held a total of $14.5 million in intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization, and $49.7 million in goodwill at December 31, 2019 after recording such impairment. Events may occur or circumstances may change such that the carrying value is not recoverable or it becomes more likely than not that the fair value of long-lived assets is reduced below the carrying value of the assets, which could result in a further write-down of our assets.
In addition, certain of our long-lived assets such as leasehold improvements, machinery, equipment, and sales demonstration assets may experience impairment as a result of events such as the closure of sites, introduction of new products, decisions to exit certain products or markets, and changes in technology. We depreciate long-lived assets and amortize intangible assets at levels we believe are adequate; however, an impairment of these assets could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
An impairment of our investments could reduce our available liquidity.
Our investment portfolio is comprised of debt securities issued by U.S. governmental agencies. These investments are intended to be highly liquid and low risk. If the markets for these securities deteriorated for any reason, including as a result of a downgrade in the credit rating of U.S. government securities, the liquidity and value of these investments could be negatively affected, which could result in impairment charges and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We compete with manufacturers of measurement systems and traditional measurement devices, many of which have more resources than us and may develop new products and technologies.
Our measurement systems compete in the broad and highly competitive market for measurement devices for manufacturing and industrial applications, which, in addition to portable articulated arms, laser trackers, 3D imaging and laser scanner products, consist of fixed-base CMMs, templates and go/no-go gages, check fixtures, handheld measurement tools, and various categories of surveying equipment. In the FARO Gage product line, we compete with a number of manufacturers of handheld measurement tools and fixed-base CMMs, including some large, well-established companies. In the FaroArm®, FARO ScanArm®, FARO Laser TrackerTM, and FARO Focus product lines, we compete primarily with Hexagon Manufacturing Intelligence, a division of Hexagon AB; Automated Precision, Inc.; Artec Europe, S.a.r.l.; Leica Geosystems Inc.,AG, a division of Hexagon AB; and Trimble Inc. In the FARO Cobalt Array Imager product lines, we compete primarily with Carl Zeiss Optotechnik GmbH, GOM GmbH, Hexagon Manufacturing Intelligence, and Nikon Metrology, Inc., a division of Nikon Inc. In the FARO Laser Projector product line, we compete primarily with ViRTEK,Virtek Vision International, a division of Gerber Technology LLC. We also compete in these product lines with a number of other smaller companies. We compete on the basis of technical innovation, product performance, quality and price with respect to all of our products.
We will be required to make continued investments in technology and product development to maintain the technological advantage that we believe we currently have over our competition. Some of our competitors possess substantially greater financial, technical, and marketing resources than we possess. Moreover, we cannot be certain that our technology or our product development efforts will allow us to successfully compete as the industry evolves. AsIf the market for our measurement systems expands, additional competition may emerge and our existing and future competitors may commit more resources to the markets in which we participate. Our results of operations could be adversely affected by pricing strategies pursued by competitors or technological or product developments by competitors.
If we fail to establish and maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting, our financial statements could contain a material misstatement, which could adversely affect our business and financial condition.
Under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules promulgated by the SEC, companies are required to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of their internal controls over financial reporting. As part of this process, we are required to document and test our internal controls over financial reporting;reporting, management is required to assess and issue a report concerning our internal controls over financial reporting;reporting, and our independent registered public accounting firm is required to attest to the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. Our internal controls over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements because of their inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error, the circumvention or overriding of controls, or fraud. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Even effective internal controls over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements. If we fail to adequately establish and maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting, our financial statements may contain material misstatements, and we could be required to restate our financial results. This could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations, lead to a loss of investor confidence and adversely affect our business, our financial condition, and the trading price of our common stock.
We derive a substantial part of our revenues from our international operations, which are subject to greater volatility and often require more management time and expense to achieve profitability than our domestic operations.
We derive more than half of our revenues from international operations. Our international operations are subject to various risks, including:
•difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations;
•political and economic instability;
•unexpected changes in regulatory requirements and laws;
•longer customer payment cycles and difficulty collecting accounts receivable;
•compliance with export and import regulations, including tariffs, and trade restrictions;
•governmental restrictions on the transfer of funds to us from our operations outside the United States; and
•burdens of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws and labor practices.
Several of the countries where we operate have emerging or developing economies, which may be subject to greater currency volatility, negative growth, high inflation, limited availability of foreign exchange and other risks. These factors may harm our results of operations and any measures that we may implement to reduce the effect of volatile currencies and other risks of our international operations may not be effective.
Our financial results may be adversely affected by exposure to additional tax liabilities.
As a multinational corporation, we are subject to income tax in the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Our effective tax rate is directly impacted by the application of complex tax laws and regulations and is highly dependent upon the geographic mix of our worldwide earnings or losses, the tax regulations in each country or geographic region in which we operate, and the availability of tax credits and loss carry-forwards. Our provision for income taxes and tax liability in the future could be adversely affected by many factors including, but not limited to, income before taxes being lower than anticipated in countries with lower statutory tax rates and higher than anticipated in countries with higher statutory tax rates, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, and changes in tax laws, regulations, accounting principles or interpretation of accounting principles. Application of tax laws and regulations is also subject to legal and factual interpretation, judgment, and uncertainty. Further, tax laws are subject to change as a result of changes in fiscal policy and legislation and the evolution of regulations and court rulings.
On December 22, 2017, the United States enacted tax reform legislation commonly known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Tax Cuts Act”), resulting in significant modifications to existing law. SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 (“SAB 118”) provides additional clarification regarding the application of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 740 in situations where a company does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of the Tax Cuts Act for the reporting period in which the Tax Cuts Act was enacted. SAB 118 provides for a measurement period beginning in the reporting period that includes the Tax Cuts Act's December 2017 enactment date and ending when we have obtained, prepared, and analyzed the information needed in order to complete the accounting for such income tax effects, but in no circumstances will the measurement period extend beyond one year from the enactment date. Additional work is necessary to perform a more detailed analysis of historical foreign earnings. Upon gathering all necessary data, interpreting any additional guidance from tax authorities, and completing the analysis, our provisional amount will be adjusted in the measurement period allowable in accordance with SAB 118. Our provisional amount relating to the transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of foreign earnings may materially differ upon completing the analysis compared to the amount accrued as of December 31, 2017.
The income and non-income tax regimes we are subject to or operate under may be subject to significant change. Changes in tax laws or tax rulings, or changes in interpretations of existing laws, could materially affect our financial position and results of operations. Certain countries in Europe, as well as a number of other countries and organizations, have recently proposed or recommended changes to existing tax laws that could significantly increase our tax obligations in many countries where we do business or require us to change the manner in which we operate our business. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (“OECD”) has continued to work on aissue guidelines and proposals related to its Base Erosion and Profit Sharing (“BEPS”) initiative. In 2015, the OECD issued initial guidelines and proposals that may change various aspects of the existing framework underinitiative, which our tax obligations are determined in many of the countries in which we do business. As BEPS guidance is further released, legislative changes may result that could potentially impact the recorded amounts of our deferred tax assets, deferred tax liabilities and our effective tax rate. The European Commission has conducted investigationsresult in multiple countries focusing on whether local country tax rulings or tax legislation provides preferential tax treatment that violates European Union state aid rules and concluded that certain countries, including Ireland, have provided illegal state aid in certain cases. These investigations may result inlegislative changes to the tax treatment of our foreign operations.operations, as well as impact our effective tax rate and the value of our deferred tax assets.
Implementation ofDevelopments relating to the United Kingdom's (“UK”) exit from European Union membership could adversely impact our business.
On June 23, 2016, the UK held a referendum in which voters approved an exit from the European Union. In March 2017,Union, commonly referred to as “Brexit.” Following a protracted period of negotiation, the UK invoked Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union, which triggeredceased to be a two-year period, subject to extension by unanimous consentmember of the European Union member states,on January 31, 2020, after the ratification and approval of a withdrawal agreement by the European Union and the UK. The withdrawal agreement provides for a transition period until December 31, 2020 (the “Transition Period”), during which the UK government will negotiate its withdrawal agreement with the European Union. Although it is unknown what the terms of the UK’s future trading relationship withbetween the European Union and the UK will be negotiated. Throughout the Transition Period, the legal and regulatory framework as between the UK and the European Union will beremain the same.
Brexit and the perceptions as to its potential impact have and may continue to adversely affect business activity and economic conditions in Europe and globally and could contribute to instability in global financial and foreign exchange markets both during and after the UK’s exit from European Union membership, it is possible that there will beTransition Period. Brexit could also have the effect of imposing greater restrictions on, and costs associated with, imports and exports between the UK and European Union members,member states, including, without limitation, the imposition of tariffs and increased regulatory complexities. The hiring and retention of skilled labor may also become more challenging if the free movement of workers between the European Union and the UK ends. We may also be impacted by exchange rate volatility during and after the Transition Period. Any of these factors could adversely affect our business and operating results by adversely affecting customer demand and our relationships with customers in the UK and the European Union. In addition, as a result of Brexit, other European countries may seek to conduct referenda with respect to their continuing membership with the European Union. If there is no agreed upon long-term trading arrangement by the end of the Transition Period (a so-called “hard Brexit”), it would likely have a significant adverse impact on labor and trade and create significant short-term currency volatility.
Given these possibilities and others we may not anticipate, as well as the lack of comparable precedent, the full extent to which we will be affected by Brexit is uncertain. Any of the potential negative effects of Brexit could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Reductions in defense spending could adversely affect our business.
Certain of our customers operate in the defense sector and depend significantly on U.S. government spending. In August 2011, Congress enacted the Budget Control Act of 2011, which imposed spending caps and certain reductions in defense spending through 2021. Automatic spending reductions, referred to as sequestration, were implemented in March 2013. Ongoing budgetary discussions in the federal government may result in other cuts to defense spending. Reductions in defense spending that impact the aerospace and defense industries, or uncertainty regarding future levels of government expenditures, could have an adverse effect on our results of operations. Additionally, if Congress is unable to pass appropriations bills in a timely manner, a government shutdown could result, which may have impacts in addition to those resulting from budget cuts, sequestration impacts or program-level appropriations, including payment delays, impairment of our ability to perform work on existing contracts and reductions in future orders.
We are subject to the impact of governmental and other similar certification processes and regulations, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Our operations are subject to numerous governmental laws and regulations, including those governing antitrust and competition, the environment, collection, recycling, treatment and disposal of covered electronic products and components, import and export of products, currency conversions and repatriation, taxation of foreign earnings and earnings of expatriate personnel, and use of local employees and suppliers. An inability to comply with these regulations or obtain any necessary certifications in a timely manner could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Manufacturers of electrical goods are subject to the European Union’s RoHS2 and WEEE directives, which took effect during 2006. RoHS2 prohibits the use of lead, mercury and certain other specified substances in electronics products, and WEEE makes producers of electrical goods financially responsible for specified collection, recycling, treatment, and disposal of covered electronic products and components. While we currently hold WEEE registration and believe we are in compliance with the directives of the European Union, including the RoHS2 directive, parallel initiatives are being proposed in other jurisdictions, including several states in the United States and China. If we do not comply with any such initiatives, our sales and results of operations could be materially impacted.
In addition, a number of data protection laws impact, or may impact, the manner in which we collect, process and transfer personal data. Most notably, the GDPR, which went into effect in May 2018, expands data protection compliance obligations and authorizes significantly increased fines for noncompliance, requiring additional compliance resources and efforts on our part. Further, a number of other regions where we do business, including the United States, the Asia-Pacific region and Latin America, have enacted or are considering new data protection regulations that may impact our business activities that involve the processing of personal data. Compliance with enhanced data protection laws requires additional resources and efforts, and noncompliance with personal data protection regulations could result in increased regulatory enforcement and significant monetary fines and costs, which could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our sales to the U.S. government are subject to compliance with regulatory and contractual requirements, and noncompliance could expose us to liability or impede current or future business.
The Government, as well as state and local governments, can typically terminate or modify their contracts with us either at their discretion or if we default by failing to perform under the terms of the applicable contract, which could expose us to liability and impede our ability to compete in the future for contracts and orders. The failure to comply with regulatory and contractual requirements could subject us to investigations, price reductions, up to treble damages, fines or other sanctions and penalties. Additionally, violations of certain regulatory and contractual requirements could also result in us being suspended or debarred from future government contracting.
We have sold our products and related services to the Government under General Services Administration Federal Supply Schedule contracts since 2002 and are currently selling our products and related services to the Government under two such GSA Contracts. Our sales to the Government under the GSA Contracts were approximately $15.2 million, or approximately 4.0% of our total sales, for the year ended December 31, 2019. Each GSA Contract is subject to extensive legal and regulatory requirements and includes, among other provisions, a price reduction clause (the “Price Reduction Clause”), which generally requires us to reduce the prices billed to the Government under the GSA Contracts to correspond to the lowest prices billed to certain benchmark customers.
Late in the fourth quarter of 2018, during an internal review we preliminarily determined that certain of our pricing practices may have resulted in the Government being overcharged under the Price Reduction Clauses of the GSA Contracts (the “GSA Matter”). On February 14, 2019, we reported the GSA Matter to the GSA and its Office of Inspector General.
As a result of the GSA Matter, for the fourth quarter of 2018, we reduced our total sales by a $4.8 million estimated cumulative sales adjustment, representative of the last six years of estimated overcharges to the Government under the GSA Contracts. In addition, for the fourth quarter of 2018, we recorded $0.5 million of imputed interest related to the estimated cumulative sales adjustment, which increased Interest expense, net and resulted in an estimated total liability of $5.3 million for the GSA Matter. This estimate was based on our preliminary review as of February 20, 2019, the date of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.
On July 15, 2019, we submitted a report to the GSA and its Office of Inspector General setting forth the findings of the review conducted by our outside legal counsel and forensic accountants (the “Review”). Based on the results of the Review, we reduced our total sales for second quarter 2019 by an incremental $5.8 million sales adjustment, reflecting an estimated aggregate overcharge of $10.6 million under the GSA Contracts for the period from July 2011 to March 2019. In addition, we recorded an incremental $0.8 million of imputed interest related to the estimated cumulative sales adjustment during 2019, which increased Interest expense, net and resulted in a $6.6 million total incremental increase in the estimated total liability for the GSA Matter. As of the date of the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have recorded an aggregate estimated total liability for the GSA Matter of $11.9 million. This estimate is based on the information we have as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is subject to change based on discussions with our outside legal counsel and the Government.
In January 2020, we received requests for additional information from the GSA and its Office of Inspector General, and we are working with the GSA in responding to such inquiries. We intend to cooperate fully with this and any other Government inquiries. The Government’s review of, or investigation into, this matter could result in civil and criminal penalties, administrative sanctions and contract remedies being imposed on us, including but not limited to, termination of the GSA Contracts, repayments of amounts already received under the GSA Contracts, forfeiture of profits, damages, suspension of payments, fines, and suspension or debarment from doing business with the Government and possibly U.S. state and local governments. We may also be subject to litigation and recovery under the federal False Claims Act and possibly similar state laws, which could include claims for treble damages, penalties, fees and costs. As a result, we cannot reasonably predict the outcome of the Government's review of, or investigation into, this matter at this time or the resulting future financial impact on us. Any of these outcomes could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, our sales, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition, and the trading price of our common stock. In addition, we have incurred, and will continue to incur, legal and related costs in connection with the Review and the Government's response to this matter.
Any failure to comply with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act or similar anti-corruption laws could subject us to fines and penalties.
In 2012, our monitorship expired pursuant to our settlement with the SEC and the United States Department of Justice, or DOJ, concerning certain payments made by our subsidiary in China that may have violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or the FCPA and other applicable laws. We are, of course, still subject to such laws and have adopted and maintain a compliance program designed to ensure compliance with these laws; however, in light of our prior conduct, any future failure to comply with any such continuing obligations could result in the SEC and the DOJ aggressively seeking to impose penalties against us. In addition, many countries in which we operate have increased regulation regarding anti-corruption practices generally. Compliance with such regulations could be costly and could adversely impact our results of operations or delay entry into new markets.
We may face difficulties managing the effects of any future growth.
If our business grows rapidly in the future, we expect it to result in:
•increased complexity;
•increased responsibility for existing and new management personnel; and
•incremental strain on our operations and financial and management systems.
If we are not able to manage the effects of any future growth, our business, financial condition and operating results may be harmed.
Our dependence on suppliers for materials could impair our ability to manufacture our products.
Outside vendors provide key components used in the manufacture of our products. Any supply interruption in a limited source component would hinder our ability to manufacture our products until a new source of supply is identified. In addition, an uncorrected defect or supplier’s variation in a component, either known or unknown, or incompatibility with our manufacturing processes, could hinder our ability to manufacture our products. We may not be able to find a sufficient alternative supplier in a reasonable period of time, or on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. If we fail to obtain a supplier for the manufacture of components of our potential products, we may experience delays or interruptions in our operations, which would adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
A valuation allowance may be required for our U.S. deferred tax assets, which may reduce our earnings and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our balance sheet includes $15.6$18.8 million in deferred tax assets. Approximately half of that amount relates to U.S. deferred tax assets. On a quarterly basis, we assess our ability to realize our deferred tax assets to ensure no valuation allowance is required. The ultimate realization of our U.S. deferred tax assets is dependent upon our ability to generate future U.S. taxable income during the periods in which those deferred tax assets would be deductible. Our inability to realize our U.S. deferred tax assets may reduce our earnings and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Based on an evaluation we conducted, we determined that it was not necessary to establish a valuation allowance against any of our U.S. deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2017.2019. However, we will continue to monitor whether a valuation allowance is necessary, and if we are required to establish a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets, it could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Risks generally associated with our information systems could adversely affect our business reputation and results of operations.
We rely on our information systems to obtain, rapidly process, analyze and manage data to, among other things:
•facilitate the purchase and distribution of thousands of inventory items;
•receive, process and ship orders on a timely basis;
•accurately bill and collect from customers;
•process payments to suppliers and employees; and
•summarize results and manage our business.
Our primary and back-up computer systems are subject to damage or interruption from power outages, computer and telecommunication failures, computer viruses, security breaches, natural disasters and errors by employees. Though losses arising from some of these issues wouldmay be covered by insurance, interruptions of our critical business computer systems or failure of our back-up systems could lead to a loss of sales or decreased profitability.
A cyberattack or security breach of our systems may compromise the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of our internal data and the availability of our products and websites designed to support our customers or their data. Computer hackers, foreign governments or cyber terrorists may attempt to penetrate our network security and our website. Unauthorized access to our proprietary business information or customer data may be obtained through break-ins, sabotage, breach of our secure network by an unauthorized party, computer viruses, computer denial-of-service attacks, employee theft or misuse or other misconduct. Because the techniques used by computer programmers who may attempt to penetrate and sabotage our network security or our website change frequently and may not be recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques. It is also possible that unauthorized access to customer data may be obtained through inadequate use of security controls by customers, suppliers or other vendors. Any security breach, cyberattack or cyber security breach, and any incident involving the misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized disclosure of, or access to, sensitive or confidential customer information, whether involving us or involving one of our vendors, could require us to expend significant resources to remediate any damage, could interrupt our operations and damage our reputation, and could also result in regulatory enforcement actions, material fines and penalties, litigation or other actions which could have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation and results of operations.
We are subject to risks of natural disasters.disasters and other catastrophic events.
The occurrence of one or more natural disasters, such as fires, explosions, tornadoes, hurricanes, earthquakes, floods and other forms of severe weather, or the occurrence of acts of war, political unrest, terrorist activities or labor issues, including due to public health crises such as pandemics and epidemics, where we have a manufacturing facility could result in physical damage to, and complete or partial closure of, our manufacturing facilities, which could adversely affect our business, operations and financial performance. Interruptions in our manufacturing operations or damage to our manufacturing facilities could reduce our revenues and increase our costs, and the extent of losses from natural disasters, and severe weather and such other events will be a function of both the severity of the event and the total amount of insured exposure. Although we maintain insurance coverage, we can offer no assurance that our insurance coverage will be adequate to cover any losses or that we will be able to maintain insurance at a reasonable cost in the future. If losses from business interruption or property damage exceed the amounts for which we are insured, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.
We may experience volatility in our stock price.
The price of our common stock has been, and may continue to be, highly volatile in response to various factors, many of which are beyond our control, including:
•fluctuations in demand for, and sales of, our products or prolonged downturns in the industries that we serve;
•actual or anticipated variations in quarterly or annual operating results;
•general economic uncertainties;
•speculation in the press or investment community; and
•announcements of technological innovations or new products by us or our competitors.
The market price of our common stock may also be affected by our inability to meet analyst and investor expectations and failure to achieve projected financial results. Any failure to meet such expectations or projected financial results, even if minor, could cause the market price of our common stock to decline significantly. Volatility in our stock price may result in the inability of our shareholders to sell their shares at or above the price at which they purchased them.
Our relatively small public float and daily trading volume have in the past caused, and may in the future result in, significant volatility in our stock price. At December 31, 2017,2019, we had approximately 16.517.5 million shares outstanding held by non-affiliates. Our daily trading volume for the year ended December 31, 20172019 averaged approximately 97,523100,645 shares.
In addition, stock markets have experienced in the past and may in the future experience a high level of price and volume volatility, and the market prices of equity securities of many companies have experienced in the past and may in the future experience wide price fluctuations not necessarily related to the operating performance of such companies. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our common stock. In the past, securities class action lawsuits frequently have been instituted against such companies following periods of volatility in the market price of such companies’ securities. If any such litigation is instigated against us, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Anti-takeover provisions in our articles of incorporation, bylaws and provisions of Florida law could delay or prevent a change of control that you may favor.
Our articles of incorporation, bylaws and provisions of Florida law could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us. Although we believe such provisions are appropriate to protect long-term value for our shareholders, these provisions could discourage potential takeover attempts and could adversely affect the market price of our shares. Because of these provisions, you might not be able to receive a premium on your investment. These provisions include:
•a limitation on shareholders’ ability to call a special meeting of our shareholders;
•advance notice requirements to nominate directors for election to our board of directors or to propose matters that can be acted on by shareholders at shareholder meetings;
•our classified board of directors, which means that approximately one-third of our directors are elected each year; and
•the authority of the board of directors to issue, without shareholder approval, preferred stock with such terms as the board of directors may determine.
The provisions described above could delay or make more difficult transactions involving a change in control of the Company or our management.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Americas
Our headquarters is located in a leased building in Lake Mary, Florida containing approximately 46,500 square feet. This facility houses our sales, marketing, customer service/application operations and administrative staff. Our U.S. production, research and development, service operations and manufacturing are located in another leased building in Lake Mary, Florida, which consists of approximately 35,000 square feet, as well as a leased facility consisting of approximately 90,400 square feet located in Exton, Pennsylvania containing research and development, manufacturing and service operations of our FARO Laser Tracker™, FARO Cobalt Array Imager, FARO Focus, and FARO Laser Projector product lines, as well as a leased facility consisting of approximately 21,400 square feet located in Hudson, New Hampshire containing research and development, manufacturing, sales, and the service operations of our advanced galvanometer-based optical scanner product lines. We also lease a facility in Nuevo Leon, Mexico containing service and sales operations, which consists of approximately 36,000 square feet. The facilities in the Americas region serve all of our reporting segments.
Europe/Middle East/Africa
OurIn EMEA, headquarters isour primary operations are located in a leased building in Stuttgart, Germany containing approximately 105,300 square feet. This facility houses the manufacturing, research and development, administration, sales, marketing and service management personnel for our EMEA operations. Additionally, we have a leased facility consisting of approximately 15,900 square feet located in Schaffhausen, Switzerland containing manufacturing operations for our products shipped to customers in EMEA. We also have a leased service and sales facility located in Warwickshire, Great Britain consisting of approximately 12,700 square feet. The facilities in the EMEA region serve all of our reporting segments.
Asia-Pacific
Our Asia-Pacific headquarters isIn APAC, our primary operations are located in a leased building in Singapore containing approximately 22,000 square feet. This facility houses the administration, sales, marketing, service management personnel and manufacturing for our Asia-Pacific operations. Our Japan operations are located in a leased building in Nagoya, Japan containing approximately 15,900 square feet. This facility houses our Japanese sales, marketing and service operations. Our China operations are located in a leased building in Shanghai, China containing approximately 24,700 square feet for sales, marketing and service operations. The facilities in the Asia-Pacific region serve all of our reporting segments.
We believe our current facilities will be adequate for our needs in 20182020 and that we will be able to locate suitable space for additional regional offices or enhanced production needs as necessary.
The information required by the remainder of this Item is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are not involved in any legal proceedings other than routine litigation arising in the normal course of business, none of which we believe will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.SECURITIES
Market Information and Holders
Our common stock is listed and traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “FARO”.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices of our common stock as reported by the Nasdaq Global Select Market:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| | | High | | Low | | High | | Low |
| First Quarter | | $ | 38.95 |
| | $ | 33.10 |
| | $ | 35.70 |
| | $ | 20.72 |
|
| Second Quarter | | 40.00 |
| | 31.90 |
| | 38.01 |
| | 27.87 |
|
| Third Quarter | | 40.60 |
| | 32.25 |
| | 36.87 |
| | 30.20 |
|
| Fourth Quarter | | 54.40 |
| | 37.30 |
| | 40.15 |
| | 29.00 |
|
As of February 19, 2018,17, 2020, we had 5041 holders of record of our common stock.
Dividends
To date, we have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We expect to retain future earnings for use in operating and expanding our business, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the reasonably foreseeable future.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
During the yearyears ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, we did not sell any equity securities that were not registered under the Securities Act.
Purchases of Equity Securities
On November 24, 2008, our Board of Directors approved a $30$30.0 million share repurchase program. Subsequently, in October 2015, our Board of Directors authorized an increase to the existing share repurchase program from $30.0 million to $50.0 million. In December 2018, our Board of Directors authorized management to utilize the share repurchase program, beginning January 1, 2019, to maintain the number of our issued and outstanding shares to address the dilutive impact of stock options exercises and the settlement of restricted stock units. Acquisitions for the share repurchase program may be made from time to time at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements and subject to market conditions and other factors.factors under this program. The share repurchase program may be discontinued at any time. There is no expiration date or other restriction governing the period over which we can repurchase shares under the program. In October 2015, our Board of Directors authorized an increase to the existing share repurchase program from $30 million to $50 million. We made no stock repurchases during the yearyears ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 under this program. As of December 31, 2017,2019, we had authorization to repurchase $18.3 million remainingof the $50.0 million authorized by our Board of Directors under the existing share repurchase program.
Performance Graph
The following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing.
The following line graph compares the cumulative five-year returns of our common stock with (1) the cumulative returns of the Nasdaq Composite-Total Returns and (2) the Morningstar Scientific & Technical Instruments Index.
For purposes of preparing the graph, we assumed that an investment of $100 was made at market close on December 31, 2012,2014, the last trading day before the beginning of our fifth preceding fiscal year, with reinvestment of any dividends at the time they were paid. We did not pay any dividends during the period indicated.
The comparison in the graph below is based on historical data. The stock price performance shown on the graph is not necessarily indicative of future price performance. Information used in the graph and table was obtained from Zacks Investment Research, a source believed to be reliable, but we are not responsible for any errors or omissions in such information.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Company/Market/Peer Group | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2019 |
| FARO Technologies, Inc. | | $ | 100.00 | | | $ | 47.10 | | | $ | 57.43 | | | $ | 74.99 | | | $ | 64.84 | | | $ | 80.33 | |
| Nasdaq Composite-Total Returns | | $ | 100.00 | | | $ | 106.96 | | | $ | 116.45 | | | $ | 150.96 | | | $ | 146.67 | | | $ | 200.50 | |
| Morningstar Scientific & Technical Instruments Index | | $ | 100.00 | | | $ | 85.94 | | | $ | 103.91 | | | $ | 143.93 | | | $ | 130.34 | | | $ | 180.17 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Company/Market/Peer Group | | 2012 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2017 |
| FARO Technologies, Inc. | | $ | 100.00 |
| | $ | 163.40 |
| | $ | 175.67 |
| | $ | 82.74 |
| | $ | 100.90 |
| | $ | 131.73 |
|
| Nasdaq Composite-Total Returns | | $ | 100.00 |
| | $ | 140.12 |
| | $ | 160.78 |
| | $ | 171.97 |
| | $ | 187.22 |
| | $ | 242.71 |
|
| Morningstar Scientific & Technical Instruments | | $ | 100.00 |
| | $ | 126.56 |
| | $ | 132.76 |
| | $ | 115.65 |
| | $ | 148.25 |
| | $ | 206.73 |
|
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.DATA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year ended December 31, | | | | | | | | |
| in thousands, except share and per-share data | | 2019 (3) | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Consolidated Statement of Operations Data: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Sales | | $ | 381,765 | | | $ | 403,627 | | | $ | 360,917 | | | $ | 325,584 | | | $ | 317,548 | |
| (Loss) Income from operations | | (58,634) | | | 5,754 | | | 5,322 | | | 13,284 | | | 13,122 | |
| (Loss) Income before income tax expense (benefit) | | (61,014) | | | 4,558 | | | 5,827 | | | 12,626 | | | 12,806 | |
| Net (loss) income | | (62,147) | | | 4,930 | | | (14,516) | | | 11,107 | | | 12,813 | |
| Net (loss) income per common share: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | | $ | (3.58) | | | $ | 0.29 | | | $ | (0.87) | | | $ | 0.67 | | | $ | 0.74 | |
| Diluted | | $ | (3.58) | | | $ | 0.29 | | | $ | (0.87) | | | $ | 0.67 | | | $ | 0.74 | |
| Weighted average shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | | 17,383,415 | | | 17,043,167 | | | 16,711,534 | | | 16,654,786 | | | 17,288,665 | |
| Diluted | | 17,383,415 | | | 17,348,456 | | | 16,711,534 | | | 16,681,710 | | | 17,389,473 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | As of December 31, | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Consolidated Balance Sheet Data: | | | | | | | | | | |
Working capital (1) (2) (3) | | $ | 216,251 | | | $ | 219,219 | | | $ | 218,274 | | | $ | 212,055 | | | $ | 221,335 | |
| Total assets | | 486,842 | | | 506,244 | | | 458,578 | | | 423,714 | | | 409,186 | |
| Total debt-capital leases | | 799 | | | 360 | | | 475 | | | 21 | | | 28 | |
| Total shareholders’ equity | | 331,992 | | | 376,609 | | | 352,066 | | | 339,657 | | | 327,644 | |
(1)In 2015, management reassessed certain inventory policies based on then-current sales and customer trends. As a result, we now expect our sales demonstration inventory to be held by our sales representatives for more than one year. To reflect this change in policy, we reclassified $18.5 million as of December 31, 2015 from current assets to long-term assets, impacting the working capital calculation.
(2)In 2017, we adopted Accounting Standards Update 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes (“ASU 2015-17”), as issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, which requires that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as non-current in a classified balance sheet. We adopted ASU 2015-17 on a retrospective basis. As a result, the working capital amounts as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 have been reduced by $7.6 million and $7.8 million, respectively, to conform with the current year presentation of deferred tax assets as non-current assets.
(3)As part of our new strategic plan, in the fourth quarter of 2019, we began reorganizing the Company into a functional structure and evaluated our hardware product portfolio and the operations of certain of our recent acquisitions. As a result of our annual goodwill and intangible asset impairment test in December 2019 performed in connection with the preparation of our financial statements for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2019, we recorded an impairment charge of $35.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2019, which included $21.2 million in goodwill, $10.5 million in intangible assets associated with recent acquisitions, $1.4 million in intangible assets related to capitalized patents and $2.1 million in other asset write-downs.We also recorded a charge of $12.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2019, increasing our reserve for excess and obsolete inventory, based on our analysis of our inventory reserves in connection with our strategy to simplify our hardware product portfolio and cease selling certain products.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year ended December 31, |
| in thousands, except share and per-share data | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| Consolidated Statement of Operations Data: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Sales | | $ | 360,917 |
| | $ | 325,584 |
| | $ | 317,548 |
| | $ | 341,826 |
| | $ | 291,784 |
|
| Gross profit (1) | | 204,637 |
| | 177,960 |
| | 167,236 |
| | 188,510 |
| | 161,651 |
|
| Income from operations | | 5,322 |
| | 13,284 |
| | 13,122 |
| | 37,340 |
| | 30,154 |
|
| Income before income tax expense(benefit) | | 5,827 |
| | 12,626 |
| | 12,806 |
| | 37,522 |
| | 28,862 |
|
| Net (loss) income | | (14,516 | ) | | 11,107 |
| | 12,813 |
| | 33,649 |
| | 21,509 |
|
| Net (loss) income per common share: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | | $ | (0.87 | ) | | $ | 0.67 |
| | $ | 0.74 |
| | $ | 1.95 |
| | $ | 1.26 |
|
| Diluted | | $ | (0.87 | ) | | $ | 0.67 |
| | $ | 0.74 |
| | $ | 1.93 |
| | $ | 1.25 |
|
| Weighted average shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | | 16,711,534 |
| | 16,654,786 |
| | 17,288,665 |
| | 17,247,727 |
| | 17,087,104 |
|
| Diluted | | 16,711,534 |
| | 16,681,710 |
| | 17,389,473 |
| | 17,416,453 |
| | 17,241,115 |
|
| | | As of December 31, |
| | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| Consolidated Balance Sheet Data: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Working capital (2) (3) | | $ | 218,274 |
| | $ | 212,055 |
| | $ | 221,335 |
| | $ | 250,234 |
| | $ | 258,565 |
|
| Total assets | | 458,578 |
| | 423,714 |
| | 409,186 |
| | 425,463 |
| | 391,496 |
|
| Total debt-capital leases | | 475 |
| | 21 |
| | 28 |
| | 8 |
| | 16 |
|
| Total shareholders’ equity | | 352,066 |
| | 339,657 |
| | 327,644 |
| | 343,854 |
| | 315,950 |
|
| |
(1) | In 2016, certain prior year stock compensation expenses were reclassified between cost of sales, general and administrative, selling and marketing, and research and development expenses to reflect the appropriate departmental costs. As a result of this reclassification, gross profit for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013 was reduced by $0.4 million, $0.4 million and $0.2 million, respectively. |
| |
(2) | In 2015 management reassessed certain inventory policies based on the then-current sales and customer trends. As a result, we now expect our sales demonstration inventory to be held by our sales representatives for more than one year. To reflect this change in policy, we reclassified $18.5 million as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 from current assets to long-term assets, impacting the working capital calculation. Working capital as of December 31, 2013 has not been adjusted to reflect this change in policy as it is not practical to do so. |
| |
(3) | In 2017, we adopted Accounting Standards Update 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes (“ASU 2015-11”), as issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, which requires that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as non-current in a classified balance sheet. We adopted ASU 2015-11 on a retrospective basis. As a result, the working capital amounts as of December 31, 2016, 2015, 2014 and 2013 have been reduced by $7.6 million, $7.8 million, $5.9 million and $4.6 million, respectively, to conform with the current year presentation of deferred tax assets as non-current assets.
|
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.OPERATIONS
The following information should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements, including the notes thereto, included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Overview and Highlights
We are a global technology company that designs, develops, manufactures, markets and supports software driven, three-dimensional (“3D”) measurement and imaging and realization systems.solutions. This technology permits high-precision 3D measurement, imaging and comparison of parts and complex structures within production and quality assurance processes. Our devices are used for inspection of components and assemblies, rapid prototyping, reverse engineering, documenting large volume or structures in 3D, surveying and construction, as well as for investigation and reconstruction of accident sites or crime scenes. We sell the majority of our products through a direct sales force across a broad number of customers in a range of manufacturing, industrial, architecture, surveying, building information modeling, construction, public safety forensics, cultural heritage, and other applications. Our FaroArm®, FARO ScanArm®, FARO Gage®, FARO Laser TrackerTM, FARO Cobalt Array Imager, FARO Laser Projector, and their companion CAM2®, BuildIT, and RayTracerBuildIT ProjectorTMsoftware solutions, provide for Computer-Aided Design (“CAD”) based inspection, factory-level statistical process control, high-density surveying, and laser-guided assembly and production. Together, these products integrate the measurement, quality inspection, and reverse engineering functions with CAD and 3D software to improve productivity, enhance product quality, and decrease rework and scrap in the manufacturing process, mainly supporting applications in our Factory Metrology vertical.the automotive, aerospace, metal and machine fabrication and other industrial manufacturing markets. Our FARO Focus and FARO Scanner Freestyle3DXScanPlan laser scanners, and their companion FARO SCENE, BuildIT, FARO PointSense,As-BuiltTM, and FARO Zone public safety forensics software offerings, are utilized for a wide variety of 3D modeling, documentation and high-density surveying applications primarily in our Construction Building Information Modeling - Construction Information Management (“Construction BIM-CIM”)the architecture, engineering and Public Safety Forensics verticals.construction and public safety markets. Our FARO ScanArm®, FARO Cobalt Array Imager, FARO Scanner Freestyle3DX laser scanners and theirits companion SCENE software also enable a fully digital workflow used to capture real world geometry for the purpose of empowering design, enabling innovation, and speeding up the design cycle, supporting our Product Design vertical. FARO Visual Inspect enables large, complex 3D CAD data to be transferred to a tablet device and then used for mobile visualization and comparison to real world conditions, facilitating in-process inspection, assembly, guidance and positioning for applications in our Factory Metrology and Construction BIM-CIM verticals. Our line of galvanometer-based scan heads and laser scan controllers are used in a variety of laser applications and are integrated into larger components and systems.cycle.
We derive our revenues primarily from the sale of our measurement equipment and related multi-faceted software programs. Revenue related to these products is generally recognized upon shipment. In addition, we sell extended warranties and training and technology consulting services relating to our products. We recognize the revenue from extended warranties on a straight-line basis over the term of the warranty, and revenue from training and technology consulting services when the services are provided.
We operate in international markets throughout the world and maintain sales offices in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Switzerland, Thailand, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
We manufacture our FaroArm®, FARO ScanArm®, and FARO GageScanArm® products in our manufacturing facility located in Switzerland for customer orders from Europe, the Middle East and Africa (“EMEA”), in our manufacturing facility located in Singapore for customer orders from the Asia-Pacific region, and in our manufacturing facility located in Florida for customer orders from the Americas. We manufacture our FARO Focus in our manufacturing facilities located in Germany and Switzerland for customer orders from EMEA and the Asia-Pacific region, and in our manufacturing facility located in Pennsylvania for customer orders from the Americas. We manufacture our FARO Freestyle3DX products in our facility located in Germany. We manufacture our FARO Laser TrackerTM, FARO Cobalt Array Imager and our FARO Laser ProjectionProjector products in our facility located in Pennsylvania. We expect all of our existing manufacturing facilities to have the production capacity necessary to support our volume requirements during 2018.2020.
We account for wholly-owned foreign subsidiaries in the currency of the respective foreign jurisdiction; therefore, fluctuations in exchange rates may have an impact on the value of the intercompany account balances denominated in different currencies and reflected in our consolidated financial statements. We are aware of the availability of off-balance sheet financial instruments to hedge exposure to foreign currency exchange rates, including cross-currency swaps, forward contracts and foreign currency options. However, we have not used such instruments in the past, and none were utilized in 2017, 20162019, 2018 or 2015.2017.
Executive Summary
Our total sales decreased $21.9 million, or 5.4%, to $381.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 from $403.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. Our product sales decreased $30.9 million, or 9.6%, primarily driven by a softening in many of our served markets, with particular softness in the automotive and broader Asian markets. Our service revenue increased $35.3$9.0 million, or 10.9%, as we continued to capitalize on the growth of our global installed, serviceable base and focused sales initiatives to maintain customer relationships after the purchase of our measurement devices. Also, foreign exchange rates had a negative impact on sales of $13.0 million, decreasing our overall sales by approximately 3.2%, primarily due to the weakening of the Euro and Chinese Yuan relative to the U.S. dollar.
Change in Organizational Structure and Segment Reporting
Since the fourth quarter of 2016, we had operated in five verticals—3D Manufacturing, Construction Building Information Modeling (“Construction BIM”), Public Safety Forensics, 3D Design and Photonics—and had three reporting segments—3D Manufacturing, Construction BIM and Emerging Verticals. As discussed in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the third quarter of 2019, our new management team, led by our new Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), formulated and began to implement a new comprehensive strategic plan for our business. As part of our strategic planning process, we identified areas of our business that needed enhanced focus or change in order to improve our efficiency and cost structure. In the fourth quarter of 2019, we reassessed and redefined our go-to-market strategy, refocused our marketing engagement with our customers and re-evaluated our hardware product portfolio. We have also begun to focus on other organizational optimization efforts, including the simplification of our overly complex management structure.
As part of our new strategic plan, and based on the recommendation of our CEO, who is also our Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”), in the fourth quarter of 2019, we eliminated our vertical structure and began reorganizing the Company into a functional structure. Our executive leadership team is now comprised of functional leaders in areas such as sales, marketing, operations, research and development and general and administrative, and resources are allocated to each function at a consolidated unit level. We no longer have separate business units, or segment managers or vertical leaders who report to the CODM with respect to operations, operating results or planning for levels or components below the total Company level. Instead, our CODM now allocates resources and evaluates performance on a Company-wide basis. Based on these changes, commencing with the fourth quarter of 2019, we are now reporting as one reporting segment that develops, manufactures, markets, supports and sells CAD-based quality assurance products integrated with CAD-based inspection and statistical process control software and 3D documentation systems. Our reporting segment sells into a variety of end markets, including automotive, aerospace, metal and machine fabrication, architecture, engineering, construction and public safety.
New Strategic Plan and Restructuring Plan
In addition to the reorganization of the Company’s structure, as part of our strategic planning process, we also evaluated our hardware product portfolio and the operations of certain of our recent acquisitions. As a result of this evaluation, we are simplifying our hardware product portfolio, ceasing to sell certain products and evaluating whether or not we will divest or shut down the related operations.
We performed our annual goodwill and intangible asset impairment test in December 2019 in connection with the preparation of our financial statements for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2019.As a result of this test, we recorded an impairment charge of $35.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2019, which included $21.2 million in goodwill, $10.5 million in intangible assets associated with recent acquisitions, $1.4 million in intangible assets related to capitalized patents and $2.1 million in other asset write-downs.See Note 7, “Goodwill” and Note 8, “Intangible Assets” to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information. We also recorded a charge of $12.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2019, increasing our reserve for excess and obsolete inventory, based on our analysis of our inventory reserves in connection with our strategy to simplify our hardware product portfolio and cease selling certain products.
In addition to the implementation of our new strategic plan, on February 14, 2020, our Board of Directors approved a global restructuring plan (the “Restructuring Plan”), which is intended to support our strategic plan in an effort to improve operating performance and ensure that we are appropriately structured and resourced to deliver sustainable value to our shareholders and customers.Key activities under the Restructuring Plan include a continued focus on efficiency and cost-saving efforts, which includes decreasing total headcount by approximately 500 employees upon the completion of the Restructuring Plan.
These activities are expected to be substantially completed by the end of 2021.We estimate that the Restructuring Plan will reduce gross annual pre-tax expenses by approximately $40 million, to be realized in the fourth quarter of 2020 on an annualized basis.We estimate that the implementation of the Restructuring Plan will result in pre-tax charges of approximately $26 million to $36 million, which are in addition to the pre-tax charges of approximately $49 million recorded in the fourth quarter of 2019 in connection with the implementation of our new strategic plan. We expect $18 million to $22 million of these additional charges to be in the form of cash charges. Actual results, including the costs of the Restructuring Plan, may differ materially from our expectations, resulting in our inability to realize the expected benefits of the Restructuring Plan and our new strategic plan and negatively impacting our ability to execute our future plans and strategies, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
GSA Matter
We have sold our products and related services to the U.S. Government (the “Government”) under General Services Administration (“GSA”) Federal Supply Schedule contracts (the “GSA Contracts”) since 2002 and are currently selling our products and related services to the Government under two such GSA Contracts. Our sales to the Government under the GSA Contracts represented approximately 4.0% of our total sales for the year ended December 31, 2019. Each GSA Contract is subject to extensive legal and regulatory requirements and includes, among other provisions, a price reduction clause (the “Price Reduction Clause”), which generally requires us to reduce the prices billed to the Government under the GSA Contracts to correspond to the lowest prices billed to certain benchmark customers.
Late in the fourth quarter of 2018, during an internal review we determined that certain of our pricing practices may have resulted in the Government being overcharged under the Price Reduction Clauses of the GSA Contracts (“the GSA Matter”). As a result, we performed remediation efforts, including but not limited to, the identification of additional controls and procedures to ensure future compliance with the pricing and other requirements of the GSA Contracts. We also retained outside legal counsel and forensic accountants to assist with these efforts and to conduct a comprehensive review of our pricing and other practices under the GSA Contracts (the “Review”). On February 14, 2019, we reported the GSA Matter to the GSA and its Office of Inspector General.
As a result of the GSA Matter, for the fourth quarter of 2018, we reduced our total sales by a $4.8 million estimated cumulative sales adjustment, representative of the last six years of estimated overcharges to the Government under the GSA Contracts. In addition, for the fourth quarter of 2018, we recorded $0.5 million of imputed interest related to the estimated cumulative sales adjustment, which increased Interest expense, net and resulted in an estimated total liability of $5.3 million for the GSA Matter, which was based on our preliminary review as of February 20, 2019, the date of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.
On July 15, 2019, we submitted a report to the GSA and its Office of Inspector General setting forth the findings of the Review conducted by our outside legal counsel and forensic accountants. Based on the results of the Review, we reduced our total sales for second quarter 2019 by an incremental $5.8 million sales adjustment, reflecting an estimated aggregate overcharge of $10.6 million under the GSA Contracts for the period from July 2011 to March 2019. In addition, we recorded an incremental $0.8 million of imputed interest related to the estimated cumulative sales adjustment during 2019, which increased Interest expense, net and resulted in a $6.6 million total incremental increase in the estimated total liability for the GSA Matter. As of the date of the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have recorded an aggregate estimated total liability for the GSA Matter of $11.9 million. This estimate is based on the information we have as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is subject to change based on discussions with our outside legal counsel and the Government.
Presentation of Information and Reclassifications
Amounts reported in millions within this Annual Report on Form 10-K are computed based on the amounts in thousands. As a result, the sum of the components reported in millions may not equal the total amount reported in millions due to rounding. Certain columns and rows within the tables that follow may not add due to the use of rounded numbers. Percentages presented are calculated based on the respective amounts in thousands.
Depreciation and amortization expenses are being reported in our statements of operations to reflect departmental costs. Previously, those expenses were reported as a separate line item under operating expenses. Amounts related to depreciation and amortization expenses for years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 have been restated throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K to reflect this reclassification of depreciation and amortization expenses and to conform to the current period presentation.
Selling and marketing expenses and general and administrative expenses are now being reported in the accompanying statements of operations together in one line as Selling, general and administrative. Previously, those expenses were reported as two separate line items under operating expenses. Amounts related to selling, general and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 have been restated throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K to reflect this reclassification of selling, general and administrative expenses and to conform to the current period presentation.
Software maintenance revenue is now being reported in the accompanying statements of operations as a component of product sales. Previously, these revenues were reported in service sales. Amounts related to software maintenance revenue for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 have been restated throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K to reflect this reclassification of software maintenance revenue and to conform to the current period presentation.
Software maintenance cost of sales is now being reported in the accompanying statements of operations as a component of product cost of sales. Previously, these cost of sales was reported in service cost of sales. Amounts related to software maintenance cost of sales for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 have been restated throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K to reflect this reclassification of software maintenance cost of sales and to conform to the current period presentation.
Results of Operations
2019 Compared to 2018
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Years ended December 31, | | | | | | |
| | 2019 | | | 2018 | | | Change |
| (dollars in millions) | | | % of Sales | | | % of Sales | | 2019 vs 2018 |
| | | | | | | | |
| Product | | $ | 289.7 | | 75.9 | % | | $ | 320.6 | | 79.4 | % | | $ | (30.9) | |
| Service | | 92.1 | | 24.1 | % | | 83.0 | | 20.6 | % | | 9.0 | |
| Total sales | | 381.8 | | 100.0 | % | | 403.6 | | 100.0 | % | | (21.9) | |
| Product | | 133.2 | | 34.9 | % | | 130.9 | | 32.4 | % | | 2.4 | |
| Service | | 50.4 | | 13.2 | % | | 51.2 | | 12.7 | % | | (0.8) | |
| Total cost of sales | | 183.6 | | 48.1 | % | | 182.1 | | 45.1 | % | | 1.6 | |
| Gross profit | | 198.1 | | 51.9 | % | | 221.6 | | 54.9 | % | | (23.4) | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Operating expenses | | | | | | | | |
| Selling, general and administrative | | 177.4 | | 46.5 | % | | 169.7 | | 42.0 | % | | 7.7 | |
| Research and development | | 44.2 | | 11.6 | % | | 46.1 | | 11.4 | % | | (1.9) | |
| Impairment loss | | 35.2 | | 9.2 | % | | — | | — | % | | 35.2 | |
| Total operating expenses | | 256.8 | | 67.3 | % | | 215.8 | | 53.5 | % | | 41.0 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Other expense | | 2.4 | | 0.6 | % | | 1.2 | | 0.3 | % | | 1.2 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Income tax expense (benefit) | | 1.1 | | 0.3 | % | | (0.4) | | (0.1) | % | | 1.5 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Net (loss) income | | $ | (62.1) | | (16.3) | % | | $ | 4.9 | | 1.2 | % | | $ | (67.0) | |
| | | | | | | | |
Consolidated Results
Sales. Total sales decreased by $21.9 million, or 5.4%, to $381.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 from $403.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. Total product sales decreased by $30.9 million, or 9.6%, to $289.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 from $320.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. Our product sales decrease reflected lower unit sales primarily driven by continuing softness in many of our served markets, with particular softness in the automotive and broader Asian markets. Service sales increased by $9.0 million, or 10.9%, to $92.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 from $83.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to an increase in warranty and customer service revenue driven by the growth of our global installed, serviceable base and focused sales initiatives to maintain customer relationships after the purchase of our measurement devices. Foreign exchange rates had a negative impact on sales of $13.0 million, decreasing our overall sales by approximately 3.2%, primarily due to the weakening of the Euro and Chinese Yuan relative to the U.S. dollar.
Gross profit. Gross profit decreased by $23.4 million, or 10.6%, to $198.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 from $221.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. Gross margin decreased to 51.9% for the year ended December 31, 2019 from 54.9% in the prior year period. Gross margin from product revenue decreased by 5.2 percentage points to 54.0% for the year ended December 31, 2019 from 59.2% in the prior year period. This decrease in gross margin from product revenue was primarily due to the $12.8 million increase in our reserve for excess and obsolete inventory recorded in the fourth quarter of 2019 in connection with our strategic decisions to simplify our hardware product portfolio and cease selling certain products, compared to a $4.7 million increase in our reserve for excess and obsolete inventory recorded in 2018. Gross margin from service revenue increased by 7.0 percentage points to 45.3% for the year ended December 31, 2019 from 38.3% for the prior year period, primarily due to the leveraging effect of higher warranty and customer service revenue as well as improved efficiencies in our customer service repair process.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses increased by $7.7 million, or 4.5%, to $177.4 million, for the year ended December 31, 2019 from $169.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. This increase was driven primarily by executive team transition costs, including the acceleration of stock-based compensation expense related to the accelerated vesting of stock options and restricted stock units granted to our prior executive officers and severance costs, professional fees incurred related to the GSA Matter, and an increase in compensation expenses related to our increased selling headcount, partially offset by lower commission expense due to the decrease in product sales. SG&A expenses as a percentage of sales increased to 46.5% for the year ended December 31, 2019 from 42.0% for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Research and development expenses. Research and development expenses decreased $1.9 million, or 4.1%, to $44.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 from $46.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. This decrease in research and development expenses was mainly due to a decrease in materials and consulting costs, as well as favorable changes in foreign currencies as the U.S. dollar strengthened against the Euro, which decreased the compensation cost of foreign research and development employees. Research and development expenses as a percentage of sales increased to 11.6% for the year ended December 31, 2019 from 11.4% for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Impairment loss. As a result of our annual goodwill and intangible asset impairment test performed in December 2019, we recorded an impairment loss of $35.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2019, which included $21.2 million in goodwill, $10.5 million in intangible assets associated with recent acquisitions, $1.4 million in intangible assets related to capitalized patents, and $2.1 million in other asset write-downs. There were no similar impairments in 2018.
Other expense. Other expense was $2.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. This increase was primarily driven by the impairment charge related to our equity investment in present4D GmbH (“present4D”) recorded in the second quarter of 2019 and the impairment charge related to our note receivable due from present4D recorded in the fourth quarter of 2019, partially offset by a favorable adjustment to the contingent consideration liability from a prior year acquisition.
Income tax expense (benefit). Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $1.1 million compared with an income tax benefit of $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. Our effective tax rate was 1.9% for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to (8.2%) for the year ended December 31, 2018. The change in income tax expense (benefit) was primarily due to $8.5 million of income tax expense recorded in the year ended December 31, 2019 resulting from our determination that it is more likely than not that certain foreign deferred tax assets will not be fully realized and the establishment of a valuation due to a history of cumulative losses in related jurisdictions. Additionally, the year-over-year change in our income tax expense (benefit) and our effective tax rate was partially due to a pretax book loss during the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared with pretax book income in the year ended December 31, 2018, as well as provision-to-return adjustments recorded in 2019 and 2018.
Net (loss) income. Net loss was $62.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared with net income of $4.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, reflecting the impact of the factors described above.
2018 Compared to 2017
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Years ended December 31, | | | | | | |
| | 2018 | | | 2017 | | | Change |
| (dollars in millions) | | | % of Sales | | | % of Sales | | 2018 vs 2017 |
| | | | | | | | |
| Product | | $ | 320.6 | | 79.4 | % | | $ | 287.2 | | 79.6 | % | | $ | 33.4 | |
| Service | | 83.0 | | 20.6 | % | | 73.7 | | 20.4 | % | | 9.4 | |
| Total sales | | 403.6 | | 100.0 | % | | 360.9 | | 100.0 | % | | 42.7 | |
| Product | | 130.9 | | 32.4 | % | | 115.8 | | 32.1 | % | | 15.1 | |
| Service | | 51.2 | | 12.7 | % | | 46.5 | | 12.9 | % | | 4.7 | |
| Total cost of sales | | 182.1 | | 45.1 | % | | 162.2 | | 45.0 | % | | 19.8 | |
| Gross profit | | 221.6 | | 54.9 | % | | 198.7 | | 55.0 | % | | 22.9 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Operating expenses | | | | | | | | |
| Selling, general and administrative | | 169.7 | | 42.0 | % | | 152.3 | | 42.2 | % | | 17.4 | |
| Research and development | | 46.1 | | 11.4 | % | | 41.1 | | 11.4 | % | | 5.0 | |
| Total operating expenses | | 215.8 | | 53.5 | % | | 193.4 | | 53.6 | % | | 22.4 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Other expense (income) | | 1.2 | | 0.3 | % | | (0.5) | | (0.1) | % | | 1.7 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Income tax (benefit) expense | | (0.4) | | (0.1) | % | | 20.3 | | 5.6 | % | | (20.7) | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Net income (loss) | | $ | 4.9 | | 1.2 | % | | $ | (14.5) | | (4.0) | % | | $ | 19.4 | |
Consolidated Results
Sales. Total sales increased by $42.7 million, or 11.8%, to $403.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 from $360.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 from $325.62017. Our sales increase was primarily driven by increases in both unit sales and average selling prices and growth in hardware warranty revenue, partially offset by the $4.8 million reduction of our total sales recorded in the fourth quarter of 2018 as a result of the GSA Matter (the “GSA cumulative sales adjustment”). Total product sales increased by $33.4 million, or 11.6%, to $320.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. This increase reflected improved growth in both product and service revenue as we have continued to grow our global sales force consistent with our strategy.
We began undertaking several important strategic initiatives in 2016 that we believe will drive our long-term growth and profitability, including reorganizing our business to align our sales, marketing, product management and research and development around specific vertical markets and to better define our end market applications; modernizing our sales process to improve the efficiency of our sales organization by supplementing our current direct sales approach of conducting on-site demonstrations with multimedia, web-based demonstrations and cloud-based customer relations development; accelerating and maintaining a consistent schedule of new product introductions; and reorganizing all functions, processes and people to a harmonized global mindset to improve operational efficiencies. Our vertical approach, coupled with our continued investment in our global sales force, release of new products and cost optimization represent important steps towards our long-term financial objectives. We successfully completed these strategic initiatives during 2017.
We achieved numerous milestones in 2017 involving significant product launches, sales force growth and acquisitions:
Product innovation – In 2017, we launched several new products including:
| |
◦ | FARO QuantumS FaroArm® - This introduction is certified to ISO 10360 - 12:2016. The QuantumS tests to the International Electrical Commission (IEC 60068-2) standards for shock, vibration and temperature stress relief of electro-mechanical or electronic equipment and devices.
|
| |
◦ | FARO FocusS 70 - This addition to the FARO Focus laser scanner portfolio provides industrial grade performance, which includes an Ingress Protection Rating for use in high particulate and wet weather conditions, high dynamic range imaging and extended temperature range.
|
| |
◦ | FARO FocusM 70 - This addition to the FARO Focus laser scanner portfolio provides an entry point for all professional users considering laser scanning in the Construction BIM-CIM and Public Safety Forensics markets.
|
| |
◦ | FARO VantageS and VantageE Laser Trackers - The VantageS is intended for short-to-long range measurement applications of up to 80 meters, while the VantageE supports short-to-medium range applications of up to 25 meters.
|
| |
◦ | FARO PointSense 18.0 Software Suite – This software platform delivers seamless integration into the latest 2018 AutoCAD® and Revit® (registered trademarks of Autodesk) design tools.
|
| |
◦ | FARO CAM2 Measure 10.5 – This software platform provides users with streamlined analysis and visual reporting. Workflow efficiencies are enhanced through programming data analysis to reduce required training time and minimize operator errors.
|
| |
◦ | FARO Zone – This platform enables investigators to move fluidly between 2D and 3D environments for public safety professionals. The application is used for presentations in courtroom exhibits, and enhances the ability of public safety professionals to plan for and respond to emergencies by creating accurate representations of real-world locations within local communities.
|
| |
◦ | FARO SCENE 7.0 – This software platform includes the quality and functionality of SCENE 6.2, such as automatic object recognition, scan registration and position. It adds additional functionality by enabling 3D scan data, whether it be from a single scan or multiple scans in process simultaneously, to be wirelessly transmitted directly to an onsite computer workstation in real time.
|
Global Sales Force –In 2017, consistent with our strategic initiative to drive sales growth, our worldwide period-ending selling headcount increased by 95, or 17.7%, to 631 at December 31, 2017 from 536 at December 31, 2016.
Acquisition – During 2017, we acquired Instrument Associates, LLC d/b/a Nutfield Technology (“Nutfield”), which is located in Hudson, New Hampshire. Nutfield specializes in the design and manufacture of advanced galvanometer-based optical scanners, scan heads and laser kits. The acquisition, which was completed in April 2017 for a total purchase price of approximately $5.5 million, supports our long-term strategy to expand our presence in key markets and improve our existing product lines with innovative technology.
Results of Operations
2017 Compared to 2016
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Years ended December 31, | | |
| | | 2017 | | 2016 | | Change |
| (dollars in millions) | | | % of Sales | | | % of Sales | | 2017 vs 2016 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Sales | | $ | 360.9 |
| 100.0 | % | | $ | 325.6 |
| 100.0 | % | | $ | 35.3 |
|
| Cost of sales | | 156.3 |
| 43.3 | % | | 147.6 |
| 45.3 | % | | 8.7 |
|
| Gross profit | | 204.6 |
| 56.7 | % | | 178.0 |
| 54.7 | % | | 26.6 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Operating expenses | | | | | | | | |
| Selling and marketing | | 103.5 |
| 28.7 | % | | 79.9 |
| 24.5 | % | | 23.6 |
|
| General and administrative | | 43.8 |
| 12.1 | % | | 40.8 |
| 12.5 | % | | 3.0 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | | 16.6 |
| 4.6 | % | | 13.9 |
| 4.3 | % | | 2.7 |
|
| Research and development | | 35.4 |
| 9.8 | % | | 30.1 |
| 9.3 | % | | 5.3 |
|
| Total operating expenses | | 199.3 |
| 55.2 | % | | 164.7 |
| 50.6 | % | | 34.6 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Other (income) expense | | (0.5 | ) | (0.1 | )% | | 0.7 |
| 0.2 | % | | (1.2 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Income tax expense | | 20.3 |
| 5.6 | % | | 1.5 |
| 0.5 | % | | 18.8 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Net (loss) income | | $ | (14.5 | ) | (4.0 | )% | | $ | 11.1 |
| 3.4 | % | | $ | (25.6 | ) |
Consolidated Results
Sales. Total sales increased by $35.3 million, or 10.9%, to $360.9$287.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 from $325.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.2017. Our product sales increase was primarily driven by a strong increaseincreases in our Construction BIM-CIM segment, growth in warranty revenue, and a modest increase in average selling prices. Total product sales increased by $21.9 million, or 8.6%, to $277.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 from $256.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. Our product sales increase reflected an increase inboth unit sales within our Construction BIM-CIM segment, as well as higherand average selling prices, attributable to technological advances.partially offset by the GSA cumulative sales adjustment. Service revenue increased by $13.4$9.4 million, or 19.3%12.7%, to $83.0 million for the year ended December 31, 20172018 from $69.6$73.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016,2017, primarily due to an increase in warranty and customer service revenue driven by the growth of our installed, serviceable base and focused sales initiatives.initiatives, partially offset by the GSA cumulative sales adjustment. Foreign exchange rates had a slightly positive impact on sales of $1.9$2.5 million, increasing our overall sales growth by 0.60.7 percentage points, primarily due to the strengthening of the Euro, relative to the U.S. dollar offset partly by the weakening of the Japanese Yen and Chinese Yuan relative to the U.S. dollar.
Gross profit.Gross profit increased by $26.6$22.9 million, or 15.0%11.5%, to $204.6$221.6 million for the year ended December 31, 20172018 from $178.0$198.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.2017. Gross margin increaseddecreased to 56.7%54.9% for the year ended December 31, 20172018 from 54.7% in the prior year period. Gross margin from product revenue increased by 2.6 percentage points to 60.4%55.0% for the year ended December 31, 2017 from 57.8% in the prior year period.2017. This increasedecrease was primarily due to higher average selling pricesthe GSA cumulative sales adjustment recorded in the fourth quarter of 2018 and a $4.7 million inventory charge recorded in the third quarter of 2018 resulting from an analysis of our products attributable toinventory reserves in connection with our new product introductions and acquisitions, increasing our reserve for excess and obsolete inventory, partially offset by higher average selling prices of our measurement solutions due to new product introductions, improved manufacturing efficiencies. Grossefficiencies and higher gross margin from service revenue increased by 1.4 percentage points to 44.4% for the year ended December 31, 2017 from 43.0% for the prior year period, primarily due to higher warrantyrevenue.
Selling, general and customer service revenue.
administrative expenses.Selling, general and Marketing Expenses. Selling and marketingadministrative expenses increased by $23.6$17.4 million, or 29.6%11.4%, to $103.5$169.7 million, for the year ended December 31, 20172018 from $79.9$152.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.2017. This increase was driven primarily bydue to higher compensation expense reflecting an investment in sellingfrom headcount as part ofincreases, primarily driven by our global strategic initiatives to drive sales growth. Sellingforce headcount increase, an increase in commission expense driven by increased sales and marketingan increase in global system expenses associated with implementing the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation. SG&A expenses as a percentage of sales were 28.7%42.0% for the year ended December 31, 20172018 compared with 24.5%42.2% for the year ended December 31, 2016. Our worldwide period-ending selling headcount2017.
Research and development expenses. Research and development expenses increased by 95,$5.0 million, or 17.7%12.2%, to 631 at December 31, 2017 from 536 at December 31, 2016.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased by $3.0 million, or 7.3%, to $43.8$46.1 million for the year ended December 31, 20172018 from $40.8$41.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.2017. This increase in generalresearch and administrativedevelopment expenses was primarily driven bymainly due to higher compensation and global system expenses. The higher global system expenses resultedexpense resulting from our strategic initiative to harmonize global verticals through the implementation of entity-wide systems, such as our human resource information system. Generalincreased engineering headcount and administrative expenses were 12.1% of sales for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 12.5% of sales in the prior year.
Depreciation and amortization expenses. Depreciation and amortization expenses increased by $2.7 million, or 19.6%, to $16.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 from $13.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. This increase in depreciation and amortization expenses was primarily due to higher amortization of intangible assets related to acquisitions and new production tooling for the manufacture of our new products.
Research and development expensesOther expense (income). Research and development expenses increased $5.3 million, or 17.4%, to $35.4 Other expense was $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 from $30.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. This increase in research and development expenses was mainly due2018 compared to higher compensation expense resulting from increased headcount in connection with our acquisitions. Research and development expenses as a percentageother income of sales increased to 9.8% for the year ended December 31, 2017 from 9.3% for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Other (income) expense. Other income was $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to Other expense of $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The2017. This change was primarily driven by foreign exchange transaction gains resulting from the positive impact$0.5 million of changesimputed interest expense recorded in the fourth quarter of 2018 related to the GSA cumulative sales adjustment and the effect of foreign exchange rates on the value of the current intercompany account balances of our subsidiaries denominated in other currencies duringcurrencies.
Income tax (benefit) expense. Income tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 20172018 was $0.4 million compared to losses resulting from the negative impactwith income tax expense of changes in foreign exchange rates during$20.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Income tax expense. Income2017. This change was primarily due to the higher income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 related to the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act”).
On December 22, 2017, the United States enacted the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, resulting in significant modifications to existing law. We followed the guidance in Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 (“SAB 118”), which provided additional clarification regarding the application of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 740, Income Taxes (“FASB ASC Topic 740”), if a company did not have the necessary information available, prepared or analyzed in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act for the reporting period in which the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was $20.3enacted. As a result, in accordance with the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, we recorded a provisional amount of $19.4 million compared withof additional income tax expense in the fourth quarter of $1.52017, the period in which the legislation was enacted. The portion of this $19.4 million provisional amount that related to the transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of foreign earnings was $17.4 million based on our best estimate and guidance available at that time.
As additional guidance was released during the SAB 118 remeasurement period, we completed our transition tax analysis, which resulted in an income tax benefit of $1.0 million and a $1.8 million decrease of our deferred tax assets recorded in the fourth quarter of 2018 related to adjustments to the transition tax on mandatory deemed repatriation of foreign earnings.
Net income (loss). Net income was $4.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase was primarily related to tax expense2018 compared with a net loss of $19.4 million recorded in the fourth quarter of 2017 pursuant to the Tax Cuts Act. $17.4 million of this expense related to the provisional transition tax expense on the mandatory deemed repatriation of foreign earnings. $2.0 million of this expense related to the remeasurement of our deferred tax assets and liabilities that we expect to utilize in the future as a result of the Tax Cuts Act decreasing the United States statutory corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% for tax years beginning January 1, 2018.
Net (loss) income. Net loss was $14.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared with net income of $11.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, reflecting the impact of the factors described above.
Segment Results
We use segment profit to evaluate the performance of our reportable segments, which are Factory Metrology, Construction BIM-CIM and Other. Segment profit is calculated as gross profit, net of selling and marketing expenses, for the reporting segment. The discussion of segment results for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 presented below is based on segment profit, as described above, and segment profit as a percent of sales, which is calculated as segment profit divided by net sales for such reporting segment. Our definition of segment profit may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies. For additional information, including a reconciliation of total segment profit to income from operations, see Note 16 to the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|
| | | | | | | |
| Factory Metrology | | | |
| (dollars in millions) | | December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 |
| Net sales | | $ | 245.1 |
| $ | 236.3 |
|
| Segment profit | | $ | 78.9 |
| $ | 73.7 |
|
| Segment profit as a % of Sales | | 32.2 | % | 31.2 | % |
Sales. Sales in our Factory Metrology segment increased $8.8 million, or 3.7%, to $245.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 from $236.3 million in the prior year, primarily reflecting higher average selling prices and higher service revenue.
Segment profit. Segment profit in our Factory Metrology segment increased $5.2 million, or 7.1%, to $78.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 from $73.7 million in the prior year. This increase was primarily due to the increase in average selling prices and service revenue, partially offset by an increase in selling and marketing expenses reflecting higher headcount.
|
| | | | | | | |
| Construction BIM-CIM | | | |
| (dollars in millions) | | December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 |
| Net sales | | $ | 86.3 |
| $ | 65.1 |
|
| Segment profit | | $ | 21.1 |
| $ | 14.8 |
|
| Segment profit as a % of Sales | | 24.4 | % | 22.7 | % |
Sales. Sales in our Construction BIM-CIM segment increased $21.2 million, or 32.7%, to $86.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 from $65.1 million in the prior year, primarily reflecting an increase in units sold and higher service revenue.
Segment profit. Segment profit in our Construction BIM-CIM segment increased $6.3 million, or 42.4%, to $21.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 from $14.8 million in the prior year. This increase was primarily due to the increase in units sold and higher service revenue, partially offset by an increase in selling and marketing expenses reflecting higher headcount.
|
| | | | | | | |
| Other | | | |
| (dollars in millions) | | December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 |
| Net sales | | $ | 29.5 |
| $ | 24.2 |
|
| Segment profit | | $ | 1.2 |
| $ | 9.6 |
|
| Segment profit as a % of Sales | | 3.9 | % | 39.8 | % |
Sales. Sales in our Other segment increased $5.2 million, or 21.6%, to $29.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 from $24.2 million in the prior year, primarily reflecting an increase in unit sales and higher service revenue.
Segment profit. Segment profit in our Other segment decreased $8.5 million, or 88.0%, to $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 from $9.6 million in the prior year. This decrease was primarily due to an increase in selling and marketing expenses reflecting higher headcount as part of our long-term initiatives to grow these emerging verticals, partially offset by an increase in unit sales and higher service revenue.
2016 Compared to 2015
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Years ended December 31, | | |
| | | 2016 | | 2015 | | Change |
| (dollars in millions) | | | % of Sales | | | % of Sales | | 2016 vs 2015 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Sales | | $ | 325.6 |
| 100.0 | % | | $ | 317.5 |
| 100.0 | % | | $ | 8.1 |
|
| Cost of sales | | 147.6 |
| 45.3 | % | | 150.3 |
| 47.3 | % | | (2.7 | ) |
| Gross profit | | 178.0 |
| 54.7 | % | | 167.2 |
| 52.7 | % | | 10.8 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Operating expenses | | | | | | | | |
| Selling and marketing | | 79.9 |
| 24.5 | % | | 79.8 |
| 25.1 | % | | 0.1 |
|
| General and administrative | | 40.8 |
| 12.5 | % | | 36.4 |
| 11.5 | % | | 4.4 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | | 13.9 |
| 4.3 | % | | 11.2 |
| 3.5 | % | | 2.7 |
|
| Research and development | | 30.1 |
| 9.2 | % | | 26.7 |
| 8.4 | % | | 3.4 |
|
| Total operating expenses | | 164.7 |
| 50.6 | % | | 154.1 |
| 48.5 | % | | 10.6 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Other expense | | 0.7 |
| 0.2 | % | | 0.3 |
| 0.1 | % | | 0.4 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Income tax expense (benefit) | | 1.5 |
| 0.5 | % | | — |
| — | % | | 1.5 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | | $ | 11.1 |
| 3.4 | % | | $ | 12.8 |
| 4.0 | % | | $ | (1.7 | ) |
Consolidated Results
Sales. Total sales increased $8.1 million, or 2.5%, to $325.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $317.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. Our sales increase was primarily driven by higher service revenue and a modest increase in average selling prices, partially offset by a decrease in product sales. Total product sales decreased by $3.8 million, or 1.5%, to $256.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $259.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. Our product sales decrease reflected a decline in unit sales partially offset by an increase in average selling prices in our products. Service revenue increased by $11.9 million, or 20.6%, to $69.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $57.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, primarily due to an increase in warranty and customer service revenue driven by the growth of our installed, serviceable base and focused sales initiatives. Foreign exchange rates had a slightly negative impact on sales of $1.8 million, decreasing our overall sales growth by 0.6 percentage points, primarily due to the decline of the British pound sterling and the Chinese yuan renminbi relative to the U.S. dollar.
Gross profit. Gross profit increased by $10.8 million, or 6.4%, to $178.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $167.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. Gross margin increased to 54.7% for the year ended December 31, 2016 from 52.7% in the prior year period. Gross margin from product revenue increased by 1.8 percentage points to 57.8% for the year ended December 31, 2016 from 56.0% in the prior year period. This increase was primarily due to higher average selling prices in our products and a lower write-down of inventory, partially offset by increased sales of service and demonstration inventory, which results in lower gross margins. Gross margin from service revenue increased by 5.5 percentage points to 43.0% for the year ended December 31, 2016 from 37.5% for the prior year period, primarily due to higher warranty and customer service revenue.
Selling and marketing expenses. Selling and marketing expenses were virtually flat year-over-year as a result of increased compensation expenses reflecting higher headcount, higher incentive compensation, and higher base salaries from a change in our commission structure as well as higher recruiting-related expense, almost entirely offset by lower costs resulting from not holding our annual sales meeting in 2016 and a decrease in commissions due to lower product sales and the change in our commission structure. Selling and marketing expenses as a percentage of sales were 24.5% for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared with 25.1% for the year ended December 31, 2015. Our worldwide selling period-ending headcount increased by 85, or 18.8%, to 536 at December 31, 2016 from 451 at December 31, 2015.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased by $4.4 million, or 12.2%, to $40.8 million, for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $36.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily driven by higher compensation expense due to higher headcount, higher incentive compensation, increased recruiting costs and higher costs related to businesses acquired, partially offset by lower year-over-year consulting fees. General and administrative expenses were 12.5% of sales for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 11.5% of sales in the prior year.
Depreciation and amortization expenses. Depreciation and amortization expenses increased by $2.7 million, or 23.6%, to $13.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $11.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, primarily due to increased depreciation for our new enterprise resource planning (ERP) system and service inventory that was transferred to fixed assets, as well as increased amortization of intangibles related to our prior and current year acquisitions.
Research and development expenses. Research and development expenses increased $3.4 million, or 12.9%, to $30.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $26.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. This increase was mainly due to higher project material costs and higher compensation expense resulting from increased engineering headcount in connection with our initiative to accelerate new product development and introductions, and an overall increase in incentive compensation. Research and development expenses as a percentage of sales increased to 9.2% for the year ended December 31, 2016 from 8.4% for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Other expense (income). Other expense increased by $0.4 million to $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared with $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase was primarily driven by foreign exchange transaction losses resulting from the negative impact of changes in foreign exchange rates on the value of the current intercompany account balances of our subsidiaries denominated in other currencies.
Income tax (benefit) expense. Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $1.5 million compared with income tax benefit of less than $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. This change was primarily the result of a shift in the distribution of profits and losses among our tax jurisdictions. Our effective tax rate was 12.0% for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared with (0.1%) in the prior year. Our effective tax rate continues to be lower than the statutory tax rate in the United States primarily because of our global footprint in foreign jurisdictions with lower tax rates. Our effective tax rate could be impacted positively or negatively by geographic changes in the manufacturing or sales of our products and a change in statutory tax rates in a jurisdiction, as well as the resulting effect on taxable income in each jurisdiction.
Net income. Net income was $11.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared with $12.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 reflecting the impact of the factors described above.
Segment Results
|
| | | | | | | |
| Factory Metrology | | | |
| (dollars in millions) | | December 31, 2016 | December 31, 2015 |
| Net sales | | $ | 236.3 |
| $ | 222.7 |
|
| Segment profit | | $ | 73.7 |
| $ | 63.5 |
|
| Segment profit as a % of Sales | | 31.2 | % | 28.5 | % |
Sales. Sales in our Factory Metrology segment increased $13.6 million, or 6.1%, to $236.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $222.7 million in the prior year, primarily reflecting higher average selling prices and higher service revenue across all our regions, partially offset by a decline in units sold mainly in the EMEA region. Foreign exchange rates had a negative impact on sales of $1.5 million, decreasing sales growth by 0.7 percentage points.
Segment profit. Segment profit in our Factory Metrology segment increased $10.2 million, or 16.1%, to $73.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $63.5 million in the prior year. This increase was primarily due to the increase in segment sales in addition to a higher write-down of inventory recorded in 2015 compared to 2016, partially offset by an increase in selling and marketing expenses reflecting higher headcount allocated to this segment partially offset by cost savings due to not holding the annual sales meeting in 2016.
|
| | | | | | | |
| Construction BIM-CIM | | | |
| (dollars in millions) | | December 31, 2016 | December 31, 2015 |
| Net sales | | $ | 65.1 |
| $ | 70.8 |
|
| Segment profit | | $ | 14.8 |
| $ | 16.3 |
|
| Segment profit as a % of Sales | | 22.7 | % | 23.0 | % |
Sales. Sales in our Construction BIM-CIM segment decreased $5.8 million, or 8.2%, to $65.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $70.8 million in the prior year, primarily reflecting a decline in units sold mostly in the Americas and the EMEA regions, partially offset by an increase in average selling prices and higher service revenue across all of our regions. Foreign exchange rates had a slightly negative impact on sales of $0.1 million, decreasing sales growth by 0.2 percentage points.
Segment profit. Segment profit in our Construction BIM-CIM segment decreased $1.5 million, or 9.2%, to $14.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $16.3 million in the prior year. This decrease was primarily due to the decrease in product sales.
|
| | | | | | | |
| Other | | | |
| (dollars in millions) | | December 31, 2016 | December 31, 2015 |
| Net sales | | $ | 24.2 |
| $ | 24.0 |
|
| Segment profit | | $ | 9.6 |
| $ | 7.6 |
|
| Segment profit as a % of Sales | | 39.8 | % | 31.9 | % |
Sales. Sales in our Other segment increased $0.2 million, or 1.1%, to $24.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $24.0 million in the prior year, primarily reflecting higher average selling prices mostly in the Americas region, and higher service revenue across all of our regions, partially offset by a decline in unit sales particularly in the EMEA region. Foreign exchange rates had a slightly negative impact on sales of $0.2 million, decreasing sales growth by 0.6 percentage points.
Segment profit. Segment profit in our Other segment increased $2.0 million, or 26.2%, to $9.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $7.6 million in the prior year. This increase was primarily due to a shift in our product and services sales mix resulting in higher gross margins, partially offset by an increase in selling and marketing expenses reflecting higher headcount and cost savings due to not holding the annual sales meeting in 2016.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash and cash equivalents increased by $34.8$24.9 million to $141.0$133.6 million at December 31, 20172019 from $106.2$108.8 million at December 31, 2016.2018. The increase was primarily driven by the maturity of U.S. Treasury Bills that were not re-invested,net cash flow from operationsprovided by operating activities and the proceeds from the issuance of stock,financing activities, partially offset by the purchase of property and equipment andnet cash used in the Nutfield acquisition.investing activities.
Cash flows from operating activities provide our primary source of liquidity. We generated positive cash flows from operations of $10.4$32.5 million during the year ended December 31, 20172019 compared to cash provided by operations of $37.6$6.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2016.2018. The decreaseincrease was mainly due to our strategic growth initiatives increasing ourthe non-cash impairment charges recorded in the fourth quarter of 2019, as well as changes in working capital, primarily comprised of a decrease in accounts receivable, an increase in GSA liability and unearned service and sales demonstration inventory and higher accounts receivable.revenue; partially offset by an increase in inventory.
Cash flows provided byused in investing activities during the year ended December 31, 20172019 were $15.1$9.3 million compared with cash flows used in investing activities of $37.1$55.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2016.2018. The change was primarily due to cash paid for acquisitions of $27.1 million, for our $1.8 million equity investment in Present4D, and for the maturitynet purchase of $14.0 million in U.S. Treasury Bills that were not re-invested during the year ended December 31, 2017 and a $22.1 million decrease2018, compared to no such activity in cash used for acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the year ended December 31, 2016.2019.
Cash flows provided by financing activities during the years ended December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 20162018 were $3.0$2.2 million and $0.2$19.8 million, respectively. The increasedecrease was primarily driven by thea reduction in proceeds from the issuance of stock relating to the exercise of stock options during the year ended December 31, 2017.2019 compared to the prior year, increased contingent consideration paid in connection with our recent acquisitions in the year ended December 31, 2019, and increased payments for taxes related to the net share settlement of equity awards in the year ended December 31, 2019.
Of our cash and cash equivalents, $98.8$89.3 million was held by foreign subsidiaries as of December 31, 2017.2019. On December 22, 2017, the United States enacted the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, resulting in significant modifications to existing law. We continuelaw, which included a transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of foreign earnings. Despite the changes in US tax law, our current intent is to gather and analyze information, including whether or not we will repatriate cash to the United States fromindefinitely reinvest these funds in our foreign subsidiaries. Duringoperations, as the fourth quarter of 2017, we recorded a provisional amount of $17.4 million relatedcash is needed to the increase to our taxes payable pursuant to the Tax Cuts Act associated with earnings of foreign subsidiaries. We will pay this liability over 8 years, with 8% of the liability paid each year for the first 5 years, followed by 15% in the sixth year, 20% in the seventh year, and concluding with 25% in the eighth year.fund ongoing operations.
On November 24, 2008, our Board of Directors approved a $30$30.0 million share repurchase program. Subsequently, in October 2015, our Board of Directors authorized an increase to the existing share repurchase program from $30.0 million to $50.0 million. In December 2018, our Board of Directors authorized management to utilize the share repurchase program, beginning January 1, 2019, to maintain the number of our issued and outstanding shares to address the dilutive impact of stock options exercises and the settlement of restricted stock units. Acquisitions for the share repurchase program may be made from time to time at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements and subject to market conditions and other factors.factors under this program. The share repurchase program may be discontinued at any time. There is no expiration date or other restriction governing the period over which we can repurchase shares under the program. In October 2015, our Board of Directors authorized an increase to the existing share repurchase program from $30 million to $50 million. We made no stock repurchases during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 and 2016.under this program. As of December 31, 2017,2019, we had authorization to repurchase $18.3 million remainingof the $50.0 million authorized by our Board of Directors under the existing share repurchase program.
We believe that our working capital and anticipated cash flow from operations will be sufficient to fund our long-term liquidity operating requirements during 2018.for at least the next 12 months.
We have no off balanceoff-balance sheet arrangements.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
We are party to capital leases on equipment with an initial term of 36 to 60 months and other non-cancellable operating leases. These obligations are presented below as of December 31, 20172019 (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | Payments Due by Period | | | Payments Due by Period | |
| Contractual Obligations | | Total | | < 1 Year | | 1-3 Years | | 3-5 Years | | > 5 Years | Contractual Obligations | | Total | | < 1 Year | | 1-3 Years | | 3-5 Years | | > 5 Years |
| Operating lease obligations | | $ | 20,639 |
| | $ | 6,563 |
| | $ | 8,048 |
| | $ | 2,464 |
| | $ | 3,564 |
| Operating lease obligations | | $ | 22,173 | | | $ | 7,188 | | | $ | 7,065 | | | $ | 5,549 | | | $ | 2,371 | |
| Capital lease obligations | | 475 |
| | 119 |
| | 229 |
| | 127 |
| | | Capital lease obligations | | 799 | | | 355 | | | 401 | | | 43 | | | $ | — | |
| Purchase obligations | | 54,029 |
| | 53,320 |
| | 709 |
| | — |
| | — |
| Purchase obligations | | 54,169 | | | 52,640 | | | 1,529 | | | — | | | — | |
| Transition tax liability | | 17,340 |
| | $ | 1,387 |
| | $ | 2,774 |
| | $ | 2,774 |
| | $ | 10,405 |
| Transition tax liability | | 12,247 | | | 1,166 | | 2,333 | | 5,103 | | 3,645 |
| Other obligations | | 412 |
| | $ | 412 |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| Other obligations | | 733 | | | 733 | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Total | | $ | 92,895 |
| | $ | 61,801 |
| | $ | 11,760 |
| | $ | 5,365 |
| | $ | 13,969 |
| Total | | $ | 90,121 | | | $ | 62,082 | | | $ | 11,328 | | | $ | 10,695 | | | $ | 6,016 | |
We enter into purchase commitments for products and services in the ordinary course of business. These purchases generally cover production requirements for 60 to 120 days as well as materials necessary to service customer units through the product lifecycle and for warranty commitments. As of December 31, 2017,2019, we had approximately $53.3$52.6 million in purchase commitments that are expected to be delivered within the next 12 months. To ensure adequate component availability in preparation for new product introductions, we also had $0.7$1.5 million in long-term commitments for purchases to be delivered after 12 months. During the fourth quarter of 2017, we recorded a provisional amount of $17.4 million related to the increase to our taxes payable pursuant to the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act associated with the mandatory deemed repatriation of the earnings of our foreign subsidiaries.subsidiaries, or transition tax. During the fourth quarter of 2018, we decreased the provisional estimate of the one-time transition tax by $2.8 million upon completing our analysis of earnings and profits of our foreign subsidiaries and utilization of foreign tax credits. $1.8 million of the decrease related to a change in our deferred tax assets, and $1.0 million was an income tax benefit recorded in the fourth quarter of 2018. We made our first two transition tax payments in 2018 and 2019 and will pay thisthe remaining liability over eight years, with 8% of the liability paid each year for the first five years, followed by 15% in the sixth year, 20% in the seventh year, and concluding with 25% in the eighth year.next six years. Other obligations included in the table primarily represent estimated payments due for acquisition related earn-outs.earn-outs of $0.7 million.
Inflation
Inflation did not have a material impact on our results of operations in recent years, and we do not expect inflation to have a material impact on our operations in 2018.
2020.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, as well as disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience, along with various other factors believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Some of these judgments can be subjective and complex and, consequently, actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. While for any given estimate or assumption made by our management there may be other estimates or assumptions that are reasonable, we believe that, given the current facts and circumstances, it is unlikely that applying any such other reasonable estimate or assumption would materially impact the financial statements.
In response to the SEC’sSEC's financial reporting release, FR-60, “Cautionary Advice Regarding Disclosure About Critical Accounting Policies,” we have selected our critical accounting policies for purposes of explaining the methodology used in our calculation, in addition to any inherent uncertainties pertaining to the possible effects on our financial condition. The critical policies discussed below are our processes of recognizing revenue, the reserve for excess and obsolete inventory, income taxes, the reserve for warranties, goodwill impairment, business combinations and stock-based compensation. These policies affect current assets, current liabilities and operating results and are therefore critical in assessing our financial and operating status. These policies involve certain assumptions that, if incorrect, could have an adverse impact on our operating results and financial position.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized when
For arrangements with multiple performance obligations, which represent promises within an arrangement that are capable of being distinct, we allocate revenue to all distinct performance obligations based on their relative standalone selling prices (“SSP”). When available, we use observable prices to determine the price is fixed, collectability is reasonably assured,SSP. When observable prices are not available, SSPs are established that reflect our best estimates of what the title and risks and rewardsselling prices of ownership have passed to the customer, and the earnings process is complete. performance obligations would be if they were sold regularly on a standalone basis.
Revenue related to our measurement imaging, and realizationimaging equipment and related software is generally recognized upon shipment from our facilities or when delivered to the customer's location, as determined by the agreed upon shipping terms, at which time we considerare entitled to payment and title and control has passed to the earnings process complete as of the shipping date.customer. Fees billed to customers associated with the distribution of products are classified as revenue. We warrant our products against defects in design, materials and workmanship for one year. A provision for estimated future costs relating to warranty expense is recorded when products are shipped. We separately sell extended warranties. Extended warranty revenues are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the warranty. Costs relating to extended warranties are recognized as incurred. Revenue from sales of software only is recognized when no further significant production, modification or customization of the software is required and when the following criteria are met: persuasive evidencerisks and rewards of a sales agreement exists, delivery has occurred, andownership have passed to the sales price is fixed or determinable and deemed collectible.customer. These software arrangements generally include short-term maintenance that is considered post-contract support (“PCS”)., which is considered to be a separate performance obligation. We generally establish vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair valuea standalone sales price for this PCS component based on our maintenance renewal rate. Maintenance renewals, when sold, are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the maintenance agreement. Revenues resulting from sales of comprehensive support, training and technology consulting services are recognized as such services are performed and are deferred when billed in advance of the performance of services. Payment for products and services is collected within a short period of time following transfer of control or commencement of delivery of services, as applicable. Revenues are presented net of sales-related taxes.
Reserve for Excess and Obsolete Inventory
Because the value of inventory that will ultimately be realized cannot be known with exact certainty, we rely upon both past sales history and future sales forecasts to provide a basis for the determination of the reserve. Inventory is considered potentially obsolete if we have withdrawn those products from the market or had no sales of the product for the past 12 months and have no sales forecasted for the next 12 months. Inventory is considered potentially excess if the quantity on hand exceeds 12 months of expected remaining usage. The resulting obsolete and excess parts are then reviewed to determine if a substitute usage or a future need exists. Items without an identified current or future usage are reserved in an amount equal to 100% of the first-in first-out (“FIFO”) cost of such inventory. Our products are subject to changes in technologies that may make certain of our products or their components obsolete or less competitive, which may increase our historical provisions to the reserve.
Income Taxes
We review our deferred tax assets on a regular basis to evaluate their recoverability based upon expected future reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projections of future taxable income, over a two-year period, and tax planning strategies that we might employ to utilize such assets, including net operating loss carryforwards. Based on the positive and negative evidence of recoverability, we establish a valuation allowance against the net deferred assets of a taxing jurisdiction in which we operate, unless it is “more likely than not” that we will recover such assets through the above means. In the future, ourOur evaluation of the need for the valuation allowance will beis significantly influenced by our ability to achieve profitability and our ability to predict and achieve future projections of taxable income over at least a two-year period.income.
Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes. In the ordinary course of operating a global business, there are many transactions for which the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain. We establish provisions for income taxes when, despite the belief that tax positions are fully supportable, there remain certain positions that do not meet the minimum probability threshold as described by Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”)FASB ASC Topic 740,Income Taxes, which is a tax position that is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority. In the ordinary course of business, we are examined by various federal, state, and foreign tax authorities. We regularly assess the potential outcome of these examinations and any future examinations for the current or prior years in determining the adequacy of our provision for income taxes. We assess the likelihood and amount of potential adjustments and adjust the income tax provision, the current tax liability and deferred taxes in the period in which the facts that gave rise to a revision become known.
Reserve for Warranties
We establish at the time of sale a liability for the one yearone-year warranty included with the initial purchase price of equipment,our products, based upon an estimate of the repair expenses likely to be incurred for the warranty period. The warranty period is measured in installation-months for each major product group. The warranty reserve is included in accrued liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The warranty expense is estimated by applying the actual total repair expenses for each product group in the prior period and determining a rate of repair expense per installation-month. This repair rate is multiplied by the number of installation-months of warranty for each product group to determine the provision for warranty expenses for the period. We evaluate our exposure to warranty costs at the end of each period using the estimated expense per installation-month for each major product group, the number of units remaining under warranty, and the remaining number of months each unit will be under warranty. We have a history of new product introductions and enhancements to existing products, which may result in unforeseen issues that increase our warranty costs. While such expenses have historically been within expectations, we cannot guarantee this will continue in the future.
Goodwill Impairment
Goodwill represents the excess cost of a business acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired. We do not amortize goodwill; however, we perform an annual review each year, or more frequently if indicators of potential impairment exist (i.e., that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying value), to determine if the carrying value of the recorded goodwill or indefinite lived intangible assets is impaired.
We have historically evaluatedchanged the timing of our annual test of goodwill during 2019 to align with our updated strategic plan and annual budgetary process. Accordingly, we performed our annual quantitative test for impairment annuallyof our recorded goodwill as of December 31, or when an indicator10, 2019. As a result of impairment exists. During 2017, we changedthis test, the dateestimated fair value of annual impairment assessment for our reporting units to October 1. This voluntary change in the annual goodwill testing date is a change in accounting policy, which we concluded is preferable as it better aligns the timingeach of the assessmentPhotonics reporting unit, which included goodwill recognized with the Instrument Associates, LLC d/b/a Nutfield Technology (“Nutfield”), Laser Control Systems Limited (“Laser Control Systems”) and Lanmark Controls, Inc. (“Lanmark”) acquisitions, and the 3D Design reporting unit, which included goodwill recognized with the acquisition of Opto-Tech SRL and its subsidiary Open Technologies SRL (collectively, “Open Technologies”), were determined to be significantly less than the carrying value of such reporting unit, indicating a full impairment. This impairment was driven primarily by historical and projected financial performance lower than our expectations and changes in our go-forward strategy in connection with our annual budgeting process. This change in the date of the annual impairment assessment was applied prospectively and did not accelerate, delay or avoid a potential impairment charge. If an asset is impaired, the difference between the value of the asset reflected in the financial statements and its current fair value is recognized as an expense in the period in which the impairment occurs.new strategic plan.
Each period, and for any of our reporting units, we can elect to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. If we believe, as a result of our qualitative assessment, that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit containing goodwill is less than its carrying amount, then the first and second steps of the quantitative goodwill impairment test areis unnecessary. If we elect to bypass the qualitative assessment option, or if the qualitative assessment was performed and resulted in the Company being unable to conclude that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit containing goodwill is greater than its carrying amount, we will perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. We perform the first step of the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test by calculating the fair value of the reporting unit using a discounted cash flow method and market approach method, and then comparing the respective fair value with the carrying amount of the reporting unit. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, we performimpair goodwill for the second step of the quantitative goodwill impairment test to measure theexcess amount of the impairment loss, if any.reporting unit compared to its fair value, not to be reduced below zero. Management has concluded there was no goodwill impairment for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162018 and 2015.2017.
Business Combinations
We allocate the fair value of purchase consideration to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values at the acquisition date. The excess of the fair value of purchase consideration over the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed is recorded as goodwill. When determining the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, management makes significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets. Critical estimates in valuing intangible assets include, but are not limited to, expected future cash flows, which include consideration of future growth rates and margins, customer attrition rates, future changes in technology and brand awareness, loyalty and position, and discount rates. Critical estimates are also made in valuing earn-outs, which represent arrangements to pay former owners based on the satisfaction of performance criteria. Fair value estimates are based on the assumptions management believes a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability. Amounts recorded in a business combination may change during the measurement period, which is a period not to exceed one year from the date of acquisition, as additional information about conditions existing at the acquisition date becomes available.
Stock-Based Compensation
We measure and record compensation expense using the applicable accounting guidance for share-based payments related to stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance-based awards granted to our directors and employees. The fair value of stock options, including performance awards, without a market condition is determined by using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The fair value of restricted stock awardsunits and stock options with a market condition is estimated, at the date of grant, using the Monte Carlo Simulation valuation model. The Black-Scholes and Monte Carlo Simulation valuation models incorporate assumptions as to stock price volatility, the expected life of options or awards, a risk-free interest rate and dividend yield. In valuing our stock options, significant judgment is required in determining the expected volatility of our common stock and the expected life that individuals will hold their stock options prior to exercising. Expected volatility for stock options is based on the historical and implied volatility of our own common stock while the volatility for our restricted stock units with a market condition is based on the historical volatility of our own stock and the stock of companies within our defined peer group. The expected life of stock options is derived from the historical actual term of option grants and an estimate of future exercises during the remaining contractual period of the option. While volatility and estimated life are assumptions that do not bear the risk of change subsequent to the grant date of stock options, these assumptions may be difficult to measure, as they represent future expectations based on historical experience. Further, our expected volatility and expected life may change in the future, which could substantially change the grant-date fair value of future awards of stock options and, ultimately, the expense we record. The fair value of restricted stock, including performance awards, without a market condition is estimated using the current market price of our common stock on the date of grant. Additionally, in calculating compensation expenseWe elect to account for these awards, we are also required to estimate the extent to which awards will be forfeited prior to vesting. Many factors are considered when estimating expected forfeitures including types of awards, employee class and historical experience. To the extent actual results or updated estimates of forfeiture differ from current estimates, such amounts are recorded as a cumulative adjustmentrelated to the previously recorded amounts.service condition-based awards as they occur.
We expense stock-based compensation for stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and performance awards over the requisite service period. For awards with only a service condition, we expense stock-based compensation adjusted for estimated forfeitures, using the straight-line method over the requisite service period for the entire award. For awards with both performance and service conditions, we expense the stock-based compensation adjusted for estimated forfeitures, on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award, taking into account the probability that we will satisfy the performance condition. Furthermore, we expense awards with a market condition over the three-year vesting period regardless of the value that the award recipients ultimately receive.
Also, beginning in October 2018, our non-employee directors may elect to have their annual cash retainers and annual equity retainers paid in the form of deferred stock units pursuant to the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2018 Non-Employee Director Deferred Compensation Plan. Each deferred stock unit represents the right to receive one share of our common stock upon the non-employee director's separation of service from the Company. We record compensation cost associated with our deferred stock units over the period of service.
Impact of Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In January 2017,February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU"(“ASU”) No. 2017-01, Business Combinations2016-02, Leases (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business842) (“ASU 2017-01”) in order to clarify the definition of a business and provide additional guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. Currently, ASC Topic 805 recognizes three elements of a business: inputs, processes, and outputs. While an integrated set of assets and activities (collectively referred to as a “set”) that is a business usually has outputs, outputs are not required to be present. Additionally, all the inputs and processes that a seller uses in operating a set are not required if market participants can acquire the set and continue to produce outputs. ASU 2017-01 provides a screen to determine when a set is not a business. The screen requires that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business. If the screen is not met, the new guidance (1) requires that to be considered a business, a set must include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create output and (2) removes the evaluation of whether a market participant could replace missing elements. The new guidance provides a framework to assist entities in evaluating whether both an input and a substantive process are present. This framework includes two sets of criteria to consider that depend on whether a set has outputs. Although outputs are not required for a set to be a business, outputs generally are a key element of a business. ASU 2017-01 provides more stringent criteria for sets without outputs and more narrowly defines the term output. ASU 2017-01 became effective for us on January 1, 2018 and was applied prospectively. Our adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other than Inventory (“ASU 2016-16”2016-02”), which removesis intended to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the prohibition in ASC 740 againstbalance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements to enable users of financial statements to assess the immediate recognition of the current and deferred income tax effects of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. This ASU requires the tax effects of intercompany transactions, other than sales of inventory, to be recognized when the transfer occurs, instead of deferred until the transferred asset is sold to a third party or otherwise recovered through use of the asset. The new guidance must be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption and is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim period therein. ASU 2016-16 became effective for us on January 1, 2018 and was applied on a modified retrospective basis. Our adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”), which clarifies how companies present and classify certain cash receipts and cash payments in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 became effective for us on January 1, 2018 and was applied on a modified retrospective basis. Our adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers:(Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”), amending its accounting guidance related to revenue recognition. Under this ASU and subsequently issued amendments, revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Additional disclosures are required to provide the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgmentsleases. ASU No. 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, was issued by the FASB in July 2018 and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfillallows for a contract.
cumulative-effect adjustment transition method of adoption. We have evaluated the effect that this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements by analyzing both transactional and analytical data for each of our revenue streams. The following is a status of our evaluation of impacts by significant revenue stream:
• Measurement equipment and related software: Under the prior accounting guidance, sales of measurement, imaging and realization equipment and related software sales were generally recognized upon shipment, as we considered the earnings process completeadopted ASU 2016-02 effective as of January 1, 2019 utilizing the shipping date. The related software sold with our measurement, imaging and realization equipment functions together with such equipment to delivercumulative-effect adjustment transition method of adoption, which resulted in the tangible product’s essential functionality. Our adoption of the new guidance did not result in material changes to our accounting for revenue related to our measurement, imaging and realization equipment and related software.
• Extended warranties: Under the prior accounting guidance, extended warranty sales were recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the warranty. Our adoption of the new guidance did not result in material changes to our accounting for revenue related to extended warranties.
• Software: Under the prior accounting guidance, software only sales were recognized when no further significant production, modification or customization of the software was required and when the following criteria were met: persuasive evidence of a sales agreement existed, delivery had occurred, and the sales price was fixed or determinable and deemed collectible. These software arrangements generally include short-term maintenance that is considered post-contract support. Maintenance renewals, when sold, were recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the maintenance agreement. Our adoption of the new guidance did not result in material changes to our accounting for revenue related to software only sales and maintenance renewals.
Under the prior accounting guidance, we recognized sales commission expense as incurred. Under the new guidance, we will capitalize the commission expense for those sales arrangements that extend beyond one year and amortize such costs ratably over the term of the contract. As a result, we will recognize a deferred cost assetrecognition on our consolidated balance sheet uponas of December 31, 2019 of $18.4 million of right-of-use assets for operating leases, $19.6 million of lease liability for operating leases, $0.8 million of property and equipment, net for finance leases and $0.8 million of lease liability for finance leases under which we function as a lessee. We elected certain practical expedients available under the transition provisions to (i) allow aggregation of non-lease components with the related lease components when evaluating accounting treatment, (ii) apply the modified retrospective adoption method, utilizing the simplified transition option, which allows us to continue to apply the legacy guidance in FASB ASC Topic 840, including its disclosure requirements, in the comparative periods presented in the year of adoption, and (iii) use hindsight in determining the new guidance; however,lease term (that is, when considering our options to extend or terminate the impactlease and to purchase the underlying asset) and in assessing impairment of this change on our consolidated balance sheet is not material.right-of-use assets. The adoption of the new guidance didASU 2016-02 also required us to include any initial direct costs, which are incremental costs that would not have a material change to our results of operations or cash flows. We adopted this guidance utilizingbeen incurred had the modified retrospective method but are applying it only to contracts that arelease not completed as of the date of initial adoption, an option that is available under ASC Topic 606.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2016-09”), which is intended to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 became effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods therein (our fiscal year 2017). We adopted ASU 2016-09 effective January 1, 2017. Under the new guidance, excess tax benefits that were not previously recognized because the related tax deduction had not reduced current taxes payable are to be recorded on a modified retrospective basis. This is achieved through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period in which the new guidance is adopted. Historically, we recognized all excess tax benefits when an option was exercised or a share vested since we did not have a U.S. net operating loss carryforward. Therefore, the tax benefit will be allowed under the current guidance and no adjustment to retained earnings is required.
Under the new guidance, all tax-related cash flows resulting from share-based payments are reported as operating activitiesbeen obtained, in the statementright-of-use assets. The recognition of cash flows. Effective January 1, 2017, we adopted this portion of the guidance on a prospective basis. This approach incorporates the net of the inflow and outflow from all tax-related cash flows resulting from share-based paymentsthese costs in the deferred income tax (benefit) expense line item and presents it alongconnection with other income tax cash flows as operating activities in the statement of cash flows.
We also elected to account for forfeitures related to the service condition-based awards as they occur effective January 1, 2017, which is a change from our treatment of estimating forfeitures in previous years. However, we continue to assess performance condition-based awards quarterly as required. In adopting the new policy using a modified retrospective approach, we assessed the cumulative effect adjustment and recorded to retaining earnings the difference between the amount of compensation cost previously recorded and the amount that would have been recorded without assuming forfeitures. The cumulative effect adjustment recorded to retained earnings was not material. We will continue to assess the impact of the adopted guidance on a quarterly basis and do not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory (“ASU 2015-11”), which changes the measurement principle for inventory from the lower of cost or market to the lower of cost and net realizable value. ASU 2015-11 defines net realizable value as estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. The new guidance must be applied on a prospective basis. We adopted ASU 2015-11 effective January 1, 2017. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes (“ASU 2015-17”), which requires that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as non-current in a classified balance sheet. ASU 2015-17 became effective for us on January 1, 2017. We adopted this guidance on a retrospective basis, which resulted in the reclassification of current deferred tax assets totaling approximately $7.6 million as of December 31, 2016 from current to non-current in our consolidated financial statements.
Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangible - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (“ASU 2017-04”), which is intended to simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Under the current guidance, performance of Step 2 requires us to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill by following procedures that would be required to determine the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Under the new guidance, we will perform our goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An impairment charge will beis recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value up to the amount of the goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. The new guidance also eliminates the requirements for any reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it fails the qualitative assessment. As a result, all reporting units will be subject to the same impairment assessment. We will still have the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitativeadopted this guidance in connection with our annual impairment test is necessary. ASU 2017-04 becomes effective for annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted for annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests after January 1, 2017. The amendments in this ASU will be applied on a prospective basis. Disclosure of the nature and reason for the change in accounting principle is required upon transition. This disclosure is required in the first annual period and in the interim period within the first annual period when we initially adopt the amendments in this ASU. We plan to adopt this guidance for our fiscal year endingended December 31, 2020. We do not expect that the2019. The adoption of this guidance willdid not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In FebruaryJune 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, LeasesNo. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 842)326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-02”2016-13”), which is intendedrequires the measurement and recognition of expected credit losses for financial assets held at amortized cost. ASU 2016-13, and subsequent related amendments to increase transparencyASU 2016-13, replace the existing incurred loss impairment model with an expected loss model that requires the use of forward-looking information to calculate credit loss estimates. It also eliminates the concept of other-than-temporary impairment and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangementsrequires credit losses related to enable users of financial statementsavailable-for-sale debt securities to assess the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. ASU 2016-02 must be applied onrecorded through an allowance for credit losses rather than as a modified retrospective basis and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. We plan to adopt ASU 2016-02reduction in the first quarteramortized cost basis of 2019. Although we arethe securities. These changes will result in the processearlier recognition of evaluatingcredit losses. We adopted ASU 2016-13 effective as of January 1, 2020, and the impact of adoption of this ASUthe new guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements, we currently believe the most significant changes will be related to the recognitionstatements.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Foreign Exchange Exposure
We conduct a significant portion of our business outside the United States. In 2017, 61%2019, 60% of our revenue was invoiced, and a significant portion of our operating expenses were paid, in foreign currencies. At December 31, 2017, 58%2019, 41% of our assets were denominated in foreign currencies. Fluctuations in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and such foreign currencies may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition and could specifically result in foreign exchange gains and losses. The impact of future exchange rate fluctuations on the results of our operations cannot be accurately predicted due to the constantly changing exposure to various currencies, the fact that all foreign currencies do not react in the same manner in relation to the U.S. dollar and the number of currencies involved, although our most significant exposures are to the Euro, Swiss franc, Japanese yen, and Brazilian real. To the extent that the percentage of our non-U.S. dollar revenues derived from international sales increases in the future, our exposure to risks associated with fluctuations in foreign exchange rates may increase. We are aware of the availability of off-balance sheet financial instruments to hedge exposure to foreign currency exchange rates, including cross-currency swaps, forward contracts and foreign currency options. However, we have not used such instruments in the past, and none were utilized in 2017, 20162019, 2018 or 2015.2017.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.DATA
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
FARO Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Opinion on the financial statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of FARO Technologies, Inc. (a Florida corporation) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive (loss) income, (loss), changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2019, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control— IntegratedControl-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”), and our report dated February 21, 201819, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion.
Change in accounting principle
As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for leases in 2019 due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Codification Topic 842, Leases.
Basis for opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical audit matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Reserve for excess and obsolete inventory
As described further in Note 1 to the financial statements, the reserve for excess and obsolete inventory is established utilizing the Company’s past sales history and future sales forecasts. Inventory is considered to be potentially obsolete if the product has been withdrawn from the market or the product had no sales for the past 12 months and the product has no sales forecasted for the next 12 months. Inventory is considered potentially excess if the quantity on hand exceeds 12 months of expected future sales. The resulting obsolete and excess items are then reviewed to determine if a substitute usage exists, and items without an identified current or future usage are reserved in an amount equal to 100% of the first-in first-out cost of the inventory. We identified the reserve for excess and obsolete inventory as a critical audit matter.
The principal consideration for our determination that the reserve for excess and obsolete inventory was a critical audit matter was the high risk of estimation uncertainty due to significant judgments in management’s analysis, which included management’s assessment of current and future usage of identified potentially excess and obsolete inventory. Management’s assessment was based on qualitative and quantitative factors, such as the impact from competitors, impact of competing products, product market acceptance, introduction of newer product offerings, product failures, dependence on suppliers for materials, and other considerations evaluated by management in making its assessment of excess and obsolete inventories.
Our audit procedures related to the reserve for excess and obsolete inventory included the following, among others:
•We tested the design and operating effectiveness of the key controls relating to the excess and obsolete reserve.
•We tested the calculation of current inventories within the excess and obsolete reserve by recalculating the analysis of the previous 12 months' usage, and evaluating the reasonableness of forecasted sales.
•We tested the significant assumptions made by management for not reserving potentially excess and obsolete inventory. As part of our procedures, we obtained and inspected corroborating information to support the expectation of future usage, which included evidence such as forecasts of future sales, evaluation of product repair rates, outstanding products in the field, as well as need for replacement parts. We also inquired if any outstanding purchase orders from customers, or any other relevant evidence was available to corroborate management’s assertions, as applicable.
Income taxes
As described further in Note 12 to the financial statements, the Company is a multinational corporation that is subject to income taxes in the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. The Company’s effective tax rate is directly impacted by the application of complex tax laws and regulations, which are highly dependent upon the geographic mix of worldwide earnings or losses, the tax regulations in each country or geographic region in which they operate, and the availability of tax credit and loss-carryforwards. In addition, the recoverability of deferred tax assets in both domestic and foreign jurisdictions is based on the weight of positive and negative evidence of recoverability, which includes future reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projections of future taxable income, and tax planning strategies. We identified income tax expense (benefit) and the deferred tax assets and liabilities as a critical audit matter.
The principal consideration for our determination that the income tax expense (benefit) and valuation and recoverability of deferred tax assets and liabilities was a critical audit matter were due to the multinational presence of the Company in numerous foreign jurisdictions, with varying complex tax laws and regulations. These rules may be subject to interpretation depending on the jurisdiction, and may involve significant management judgment. In addition, there is a high risk of estimation uncertainty due to significant management judgment related to establishing or reversing a valuation allowance against a deferred tax asset in a jurisdiction, which may be based on various forms of positive and negative evidence regarding the recoverability of a deferred tax asset.
Our audit procedures related to the income tax expense (benefit) and deferred tax asset and liability amounts included the following, among others:
•We tested the design and operating effectiveness of the key controls relating to the income tax provision and deferred tax asset and liability amounts. We also tested management’s controls around the review of the completeness and accuracy of the qualitative and quantitative valuation allowance analysis.
•We involved foreign tax professionals from member firms to assess significant income tax positions and calculations for completeness and accuracy. In addition, we reconciled the tax provision calculations to the underlying accounting records, tax returns, and other evidential documentation.
•We involved international tax professionals from the firm to test the Company’s assumptions regarding its geographic mix of worldwide earnings or losses. As part of those procedures, we noted the Company’s geographic mix of earnings or losses was calculated pursuant to third party transfer pricing studies performed by qualified parties.
•We tested the Company’s analysis of recoverability of its deferred tax assets in each of its jurisdictions based on evidence received from management to support the balances.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2004.
Orlando, Florida
February 21, 201819, 2020
FARO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| | | (in thousands, except share and per share data) | | December 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | (in thousands, except share and per share data) | | December 31, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
| ASSETS | | | | | ASSETS | | | | |
| Current assets: | | | | | Current assets: | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 140,960 |
| | $ | 106,169 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 133,634 | | | $ | 108,783 | |
| Short-term investments | | 10,997 |
| | 42,942 |
| Short-term investments | | 24,870 | | | 24,793 | |
| Accounts receivable, net | | 72,105 |
| | 61,364 |
| Accounts receivable, net | | 76,162 | | | 88,927 | |
| Inventories, net | | 53,786 |
| | 51,886 |
| Inventories, net | | 58,554 | | | 65,444 | |
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | 16,311 |
| | 16,304 |
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | 28,996 | | | 28,795 | |
| Total current assets | | 294,159 |
| | 278,665 |
| Total current assets | | 322,216 | | | 316,742 | |
| Property and equipment: | | | | | |
| Machinery and equipment | | 66,514 |
| | 57,063 |
| |
| Furniture and fixtures | | 6,945 |
| | 6,099 |
| |
| Leasehold improvements | | 19,872 |
| | 18,778 |
| |
| Property and equipment at cost | | 93,331 |
| | 81,940 |
| |
| Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization | | (61,452 | ) | | (50,262 | ) | |
| Property and equipment, net | | 31,879 |
| | 31,678 |
| |
| Non-current assets: | | Non-current assets: | | | | |
| Plant and equipment, net | | Plant and equipment, net | | 26,954 | | | 30,417 | |
| Operating lease right-of-use asset | | Operating lease right-of-use asset | | 18,418 | | | — | |
| Goodwill | | 52,750 |
| | 46,744 |
| Goodwill | | 49,704 | | | 67,274 | |
| Intangible assets, net | | 22,540 |
| | 22,279 |
| Intangible assets, net | | 14,471 | | | 33,054 | |
| Service and sales demonstration inventory, net | | 39,614 |
| | 29,136 |
| Service and sales demonstration inventory, net | | 33,349 | | | 39,563 | |
| Deferred income tax assets, net | | 15,606 |
| | 14,307 |
| Deferred income tax assets, net | | 18,766 | | | 14,719 | |
| Other long-term assets | | 2,030 |
| | 905 |
| Other long-term assets | | 2,964 | | | 4,475 | |
| Total assets | | $ | 458,578 |
| | $ | 423,714 |
| Total assets | | $ | 486,842 | | | $ | 506,244 | |
| LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | |
| Current liabilities: | | | | | Current liabilities: | |
| Accounts payable | | $ | 11,569 |
| | $ | 11,126 |
| Accounts payable | | $ | 13,718 | | | $ | 20,093 | |
| Accrued liabilities | | 27,362 |
| | 24,572 |
| Accrued liabilities | | 38,072 | | | 36,327 | |
| Income taxes payable | | 4,676 |
| | 618 |
| Income taxes payable | | 5,182 | | | 5,081 | |
| Current portion of unearned service revenues | | 29,674 |
| | 27,422 |
| Current portion of unearned service revenues | | 39,211 | | | 32,878 | |
| Customer deposits | | 2,604 |
| | 2,872 |
| Customer deposits | | 3,108 | | | 3,144 | |
| Lease liability | | Lease liability | | 6,674 | | | — | |
| Total current liabilities | | 75,885 |
| | 66,610 |
| Total current liabilities | | 105,965 | | | 97,523 | |
| Unearned service revenues - less current portion | | 11,815 |
| | 13,813 |
| Unearned service revenues - less current portion | | 20,578 | | | 15,505 | |
| Lease liability - less current portion | | Lease liability - less current portion | | 13,698 | | | — | |
| Deferred income tax liabilities | | 695 |
| | 1,409 |
| Deferred income tax liabilities | | 357 | | | 736 | |
| Income taxes payable - less current portion | | 15,952 |
| | — |
| Income taxes payable - less current portion | | 13,177 | | | 12,247 | |
| Other long-term liabilities | | 2,165 |
| | 2,225 |
| Other long-term liabilities | | 1,075 | | | 3,624 | |
| Total liabilities | | 106,512 |
| | 84,057 |
| Total liabilities | | 154,850 | | | 129,635 | |
| Commitments and contingencies - See Note 12 | |
| |
| |
| Commitments and contingencies - See Note 13 | | Commitments and contingencies - See Note 13 | | | | |
| Shareholders’ equity: | | | | | Shareholders’ equity: | |
| Preferred stock - par value $0.01, 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued | | — |
| | — |
| |
| Common stock - par value $.001, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 18,277,142 and 18,170,267 issued; 16,796,884 and 16,680,791 outstanding, respectively | | 18 |
| | 18 |
| |
| Preferred stock - par value $0.01, 10,000,000 shares authorized; NaN issued | | Preferred stock - par value $0.01, 10,000,000 shares authorized; NaN issued | | — | | | — | |
| Common stock - par value $0.001, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 18,988,379, 18,676,059 issued; 17,576,618 and 17,253,011 outstanding, respectively | | Common stock - par value $0.001, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 18,988,379, 18,676,059 issued; 17,576,618 and 17,253,011 outstanding, respectively | | 19 | | | 19 | |
| Additional paid-in capital | | 223,055 |
| | 212,602 |
| Additional paid-in capital | | 267,868 | | | 251,329 | |
| Retained earnings | | 168,624 |
| | 183,436 |
| Retained earnings | | 112,879 | | | 175,353 | |
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | (7,822 | ) | | (24,561 | ) | Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | (17,399) | | | (18,483) | |
| Common stock in treasury, at cost - 1,480,258 shares and 1,489,476, respectively | | (31,809 | ) | | (31,838 | ) | |
| Common stock in treasury, at cost - 1,411,761 shares and 1,423,048, respectively | | Common stock in treasury, at cost - 1,411,761 shares and 1,423,048, respectively | | (31,375) | | | (31,609) | |
| Total shareholders’ equity | | 352,066 |
| | 339,657 |
| Total shareholders’ equity | | 331,992 | | | 376,609 | |
| Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | | $ | 458,578 |
| | $ | 423,714 |
| Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | | $ | 486,842 | | | $ | 506,244 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
FARO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
| | | | | Years ended December 31, | | | Years ended December 31, | |
| (in thousands, except share and per share data) | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | (in thousands, except share and per share data) | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| SALES | | | | | | | SALES | | | | | | |
| Product | | $ | 277,922 |
| | $ | 256,010 |
| | $ | 259,842 |
| Product | | $ | 289,679 | | | $ | 320,584 | | | $ | 287,248 | |
| Service | | 82,995 |
| | 69,574 |
| | 57,706 |
| Service | | 92,086 | | | 83,043 | | | 73,669 | |
| Total sales | | 360,917 |
| | 325,584 |
| | 317,548 |
| Total sales | | 381,765 | | | 403,627 | | | 360,917 | |
| COST OF SALES | | | | | | | COST OF SALES | | | | | | |
| Product | | 110,143 |
| | 107,965 |
| | 114,257 |
| Product | | 133,246 | | | 130,876 | | | 115,761 | |
| Service | | 46,137 |
| | 39,659 |
| | 36,055 |
| Service | | 50,387 | | | 51,198 | | | 46,474 | |
| Total cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization, shown separately below) | | 156,280 |
| | 147,624 |
| | 150,312 |
| |
| Total cost of sales | | Total cost of sales | | 183,633 | | | 182,074 | | | 162,235 | |
| GROSS PROFIT | | 204,637 |
| | 177,960 |
| | 167,236 |
| GROSS PROFIT | | 198,132 | | | 221,553 | | | 198,682 | |
| OPERATING EXPENSES | | | | | | | OPERATING EXPENSES | |
| Selling and marketing | | 103,544 |
| | 79,870 |
| | 79,837 |
| |
| General and administrative | | 43,807 |
| | 40,813 |
| | 36,370 |
| |
| Depreciation and amortization | | 16,588 |
| | 13,868 |
| | 11,217 |
| |
| Selling, general and administrative | | Selling, general and administrative | | 177,378 | | | 169,717 | | | 152,299 | |
| Research and development | | 35,376 |
| | 30,125 |
| | 26,690 |
| Research and development | | 44,175 | | | 46,082 | | | 41,061 | |
| Impairment loss | | Impairment loss | | 35,213 | | | — | | | — | |
| Total operating expenses | | 199,315 |
| | 164,676 |
| 1 |
| 154,114 |
| Total operating expenses | | 256,766 | | | 215,799 | | | | 193,360 | |
| INCOME FROM OPERATIONS | | 5,322 |
| | 13,284 |
| | 13,122 |
| |
| (LOSS) INCOME FROM OPERATIONS | | (LOSS) INCOME FROM OPERATIONS | | (58,634) | | | 5,754 | | | 5,322 | |
| OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME) | | | | | | | OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME) | |
| Interest income | | (319 | ) | | (212 | ) | | (111 | ) | Interest income | | (714) | | | (429) | | | (319) | |
| Other (income) expense, net | | (190 | ) | | 822 |
| | 371 |
| |
| Other expense (income), net | | Other expense (income), net | | 2,313 | | | 1,139 | | | (190) | |
| Interest expense | | 4 |
| | 48 |
| | 56 |
| Interest expense | | 781 | | | 486 | | | 4 | |
| INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT) | | 5,827 |
| | 12,626 |
| | 12,806 |
| |
| (LOSS) INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT) | | (LOSS) INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT) | | (61,014) | | | 4,558 | | | 5,827 | |
| INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT) | | 20,343 |
| | 1,519 |
| | (7 | ) | INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT) | | 1,133 | | | (372) | | | 20,343 | |
| NET (LOSS) INCOME | | $ | (14,516 | ) | | $ | 11,107 |
| | $ | 12,813 |
| NET (LOSS) INCOME | | $ | (62,147) | | | $ | 4,930 | | | $ | (14,516) | |
| NET (LOSS) INCOME PER SHARE - BASIC | | $ | (0.87 | ) | | $ | 0.67 |
| | $ | 0.74 |
| NET (LOSS) INCOME PER SHARE - BASIC | | $ | (3.58) | | | $ | 0.29 | | | $ | (0.87) | |
| NET (LOSS) INCOME PER SHARE - DILUTED | | $ | (0.87 | ) | | $ | 0.67 |
| | $ | 0.74 |
| NET (LOSS) INCOME PER SHARE - DILUTED | | $ | (3.58) | | | $ | 0.29 | | | $ | (0.87) | |
| Weighted average shares - Basic | | 16,711,534 |
| | 16,654,786 |
| | 17,288,665 |
| Weighted average shares - Basic | | 17,383,415 | | | 17,043,167 | | | 16,711,534 | |
| Weighted average shares - Diluted | | 16,711,534 |
| | 16,681,710 |
| | 17,389,473 |
| Weighted average shares - Diluted | | 17,383,415 | | | 17,348,456 | | | 16,711,534 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
FARO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME (LOSS)
| | | | | Years ended December 31, | | | Years ended December 31, | |
| (in thousands) | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | (in thousands) | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Net (loss) income | | $ | (14,516 | ) | | $ | 11,107 |
| | $ | 12,813 |
| Net (loss) income | | $ | (62,147) | | | $ | 4,930 | | | $ | (14,516) | |
| Currency translation adjustments, net of income tax | | 16,739 |
| | (4,700 | ) | | (13,166 | ) | Currency translation adjustments, net of income tax | | 1,084 | | | (10,661) | | | 16,739 | |
| Comprehensive income (loss) | | $ | 2,223 |
| | $ | 6,407 |
| | $ | (353 | ) | |
| Comprehensive (loss) income | | Comprehensive (loss) income | | $ | (61,063) | | | $ | (5,731) | | | $ | 2,223 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
FARO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016,2019, 2018, AND 20152017
| | | | | | | | | Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss) | | Common
Stock in
Treasury | | Total | | | | | | | | Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss | | Common
Stock in
Treasury | | Total |
| | | | | Additional
Paid-in
Capital | | Retained Earnings | | | | | | | Additional
Paid-in
Capital | | Retained Earnings | | |
| | | Common Stock | | | | Common Stock | | | | | | | | Total | |
| (in thousands, except share data) | | Shares | | Amounts | | (in thousands, except share data) | | Shares | | Amounts | | | | | | |
| BALANCE JANUARY 1, 2015 | | 17,317,430 |
| | $ | 18 |
| | $ | 200,090 |
| | $ | 159,516 |
| | $ | (6,695 | ) | | $ | (9,075 | ) | | $ | 343,854 |
| |
| Net income | | | | | | | | 12,813 |
| | | | | | 12,813 |
| |
| Currency translation adjustment, net of income tax | | | | | | | | | | (13,166 | ) | | | | (13,166 | ) | |
| Restricted stock issued and stock based compensation under incentive plans | | 13,143 |
| | | | 4,306 |
| | | | | | | | 4,306 |
| |
| Stock options exercised | | 66,786 |
| | | | 2,287 |
| | | | | | | | 2,287 |
| |
| Tax impact from restricted stock and stock options | | | | | | 313 |
| | | | | | | | 313 |
| |
| Repurchase of common stock |
| (809,241 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (22,763 | ) |
| (22,763 | ) | |
| BALANCE DECEMBER 31, 2015 | | 16,588,118 |
| | $ | 18 |
| | $ | 206,996 |
| | $ | 172,329 |
| | $ | (19,861 | ) | | $ | (31,838 | ) | | $ | 327,644 |
| |
| Net income | | | | | | | | 11,107 |
| | | | | | 11,107 |
| |
| Currency translation adjustment, net of income tax | | | | | | | | | | (4,700 | ) | | | | (4,700 | ) | |
| Restricted stock issued and stock based compensation under incentive plans | | 20,925 |
| | | | 5,374 |
| | | | | | | | 5,374 |
| |
| Stock options exercised | | 71,748 |
| | | | 674 |
| | | | | | | | 674 |
| |
| Tax impact from restricted stock and stock options | | | | | | (442 | ) | | | | | | | | (442 | ) | |
| BALANCE DECEMBER 31, 2016 | | 16,680,791 |
| | $ | 18 |
| | $ | 212,602 |
| | $ | 183,436 |
| | $ | (24,561 | ) | | $ | (31,838 | ) | | $ | 339,657 |
| |
| BALANCE JANUARY 1, 2017 | | BALANCE JANUARY 1, 2017 | | 16,680,791 | | | $ | 18 | | | $ | 212,602 | | | $ | 183,436 | | | $ | (24,561) | | | $ | (31,838) | | | $ | 339,657 | |
| Net loss | | | | | | | | (14,516 | ) | | | | | | (14,516 | ) | Net loss | | | | | | | | (14,516) | | | | | | | (14,516) | |
| Currency translation adjustment, net of income tax | | | | | | | | | | 16,739 |
| | | | 16,739 |
| Currency translation adjustment, net of income tax | | 16,739 | | | 16,739 | |
| Restricted stock issued and stock based compensation under incentive plans | | 19,881 |
| | | | 6,450 |
| | | | | | | | 6,450 |
| Restricted stock issued and stock based compensation under incentive plans | | 19,881 | | | 6,450 | | | 6,450 | |
| Stock options exercised, net of shares withheld for employee taxes | | 86,994 |
| | | | 3,284 |
| | | | | |
| | 3,284 |
| Stock options exercised, net of shares withheld for employee taxes | | 86,994 | | | 3,284 | | | 3,284 | |
| Reissuance of treasury shares | | 9,218 |
| | | | 281 |
| | | | | | 29 |
| | 310 |
| Reissuance of treasury shares | | 9,218 | | | 281 | | | 29 | | | 310 | |
| Cumulative effect of the adoption of ASU 2016-09 | | | | | | 438 |
| | (296 | ) | | | | | | 142 |
| Cumulative effect of the adoption of ASU 2016-09 | | 438 | | | (296) | | | 142 | |
| BALANCE DECEMBER 31, 2017 | | 16,796,884 |
| | $ | 18 |
| | $ | 223,055 |
| | $ | 168,624 |
| | $ | (7,822 | ) | | $ | (31,809 | ) | | $ | 352,066 |
| BALANCE DECEMBER 31, 2017 | | 16,796,884 | | | $ | 18 | | | $ | 223,055 | | | $ | 168,624 | | | $ | (7,822) | | | $ | (31,809) | | | $ | 352,066 | |
| Net income | | Net income | | | | | | | | 4,930 | | | | | | | 4,930 | |
| Currency translation adjustment, net of income tax | | Currency translation adjustment, net of income tax | | (10,661) | | | (10,661) | |
| Restricted stock issued and stock based compensation under incentive plans | | Restricted stock issued and stock based compensation under incentive plans | | 15,960 | | | 7,620 | | | 7,620 | |
| Stock options exercised, net of shares withheld for employee taxes | | Stock options exercised, net of shares withheld for employee taxes | | 382,957 | | | 1 | | | 17,027 | | | 17,028 | |
| Reissuance of treasury shares | | Reissuance of treasury shares | | 57,210 | | | 3,627 | | | | 200 | | | 3,827 | |
| Cumulative effect of the adoption of ASU 2014-09 | | Cumulative effect of the adoption of ASU 2014-09 | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,799 | | | | | | | | | 1,799 | |
| BALANCE DECEMBER 31, 2018 | | BALANCE DECEMBER 31, 2018 | | 17,253,011 | | | $ | 19 | | | $ | 251,329 | | | $ | 175,353 | | | $ | (18,483) | | | $ | (31,609) | | | $ | 376,609 | |
| Net loss | | Net loss | | | | | | | | (62,147) | | | | | | | (62,147) | |
| Currency translation adjustment, net of income tax | | Currency translation adjustment, net of income tax | | 1,084 | | | 1,084 | |
| Restricted stock issued and stock based compensation under incentive plans | | Restricted stock issued and stock based compensation under incentive plans | | 88,606 | | | 11,071 | | | 11,071 | |
| Stock options exercised, net of shares withheld for employee taxes | | Stock options exercised, net of shares withheld for employee taxes | | 224,214 | | | | | | 5,468 | | | | | | | 5,468 | |
| Reissuance of treasury shares | | Reissuance of treasury shares | | 10,787 | | | | | | 234 | | | 234 | |
| Cumulative effect of the adoption of ASU 2016-02 | | Cumulative effect of the adoption of ASU 2016-02 | | | | | | | | | (327) | | | | | | (327) | |
| BALANCE DECEMBER 31, 2019 | | BALANCE DECEMBER 31, 2019 | | 17,576,618 | | | $ | 19 | | | $ | 267,868 | | | $ | 112,879 | | | $ | (17,399) | | | $ | (31,375) | | | $ | 331,992 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
FARO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
| | | | | Years Ended December 31, | | | Years Ended December 31, | |
| (in thousands) | | 2017 |
| 2016 | | 2015 | (in thousands) | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| CASH FLOWS FROM: | |
|
|
| | | CASH FLOWS FROM: | | | | | | |
| OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | |
|
|
| | | OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | |
| Net (loss) income | | $ | (14,516 | ) |
| $ | 11,107 |
| | $ | 12,813 |
| Net (loss) income | | $ | (62,147) | | | $ | 4,930 | | | $ | (14,516) | |
| Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities: | |
|
|
| | | Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities: | |
| Depreciation and amortization | | 16,588 |
|
| 13,868 |
| | 11,217 |
| Depreciation and amortization | | 18,516 | | | 18,313 | | | 16,588 | |
| Compensation for stock options and restricted stock units | | 6,450 |
|
| 5,374 |
| | 4,306 |
| Compensation for stock options and restricted stock units | | 11,071 | | | 7,620 | | | 6,450 | |
| Provision for bad debts (net recovery of) | | 370 |
|
| 898 |
| | 346 |
| |
| Provision for bad debts | | Provision for bad debts | | 2,090 | | | 907 | | | 370 | |
| Loss on disposal of assets | | 451 |
|
| 860 |
| | 947 |
| Loss on disposal of assets | | 2,639 | | | 192 | | | 451 | |
| Write-down of inventories | | 1,734 |
|
| 4,134 |
| | 10,878 |
| |
| Deferred income tax benefit | | (1,740 | ) |
| (2,002 | ) | | (655 | ) | |
| Income tax benefit from exercise of stock options | | — |
|
| (357 | ) | | (313 | ) | |
Provision for excess and obsolete inventory
| | Provision for excess and obsolete inventory
| | 16,886 | | | 5,757 | | | 1,734 | |
| Impairment of goodwill | | Impairment of goodwill | | 21,233 | | | — | | | — | |
| Impairment of acquired intangibles | | Impairment of acquired intangibles | | 10,548 | | | — | | | — | |
| Impairment of loan to affiliate | | Impairment of loan to affiliate | | 549 | | | — | | | — | |
| Deferred income tax (benefit) expense | | Deferred income tax (benefit) expense | | (6,304) | | | 689 | | | (1,740) | |
| Change in operating assets and liabilities: | |
|
|
| | | Change in operating assets and liabilities: | |
| Decrease (increase) in: | |
|
|
| | | |
| (Increase) decrease in: | | (Increase) decrease in: | |
| Accounts receivable, net | | (6,766 | ) |
| 6,727 |
| | 9,584 |
| Accounts receivable, net | | 10,406 | | | (15,995) | | | (6,766) | |
| Inventories, net | | (10,926 | ) |
| (6,729 | ) | | (18,021 | ) | |
| Inventories | | Inventories | | (4,136) | | | (20,532) | | | (10,926) | |
| Prepaid expenses and other assets | | (253 | ) |
| 3,588 |
| | (2,834 | ) | Prepaid expenses and other assets | | 1,188 | | | (11,310) | | | (253) | |
| (Decrease) increase in: | |
|
|
| | | |
| Increase (decrease) in: | | Increase (decrease) in: | |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | 1,103 |
|
| 534 |
| | (6,401 | ) | Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | (2,518) | | | 11,195 | | | 1,103 | |
| Income taxes payable | | 20,011 |
|
| 618 |
| | — |
| Income taxes payable | | 1,041 | | | (3,286) | | | 20,011 | |
| Customer deposits | | (461 | ) |
| (1,310 | ) | | 1,114 |
| Customer deposits | | (30) | | | 513 | | | (461) | |
| Unearned service revenues | | (1,690 | ) |
| 273 |
| | 5,051 |
| Unearned service revenues | | 11,436 | | | 7,330 | | | (1,690) | |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | | 10,355 |
|
| 37,583 |
| | 28,032 |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | | 32,468 | | | 6,323 | | | 10,355 | |
| INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | |
|
|
| | | INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | |
| Purchases of investments | | Purchases of investments | | (50,000) | | | (47,000) | | | (33,000) | |
| Proceeds from sale of investments | | 32,000 |
|
| — |
| | 22,001 |
| Proceeds from sale of investments | | 50,000 | | | 33,000 | | | 65,000 | |
| Purchases of property and equipment | | (8,970 | ) |
| (7,720 | ) | | (14,169 | ) | Purchases of property and equipment | | (6,675) | | | (11,021) | | | (8,970) | |
| Payments for intangible assets | | (2,377 | ) |
| (1,657 | ) | | (2,140 | ) | |
| Payments for internally capitalized patents | | Payments for internally capitalized patents | | (2,118) | | | (1,900) | | | (2,377) | |
| Acquisition of business, net of cash received | | (5,596 | ) |
| (27,708 | ) | | (12,066 | ) | Acquisition of business, net of cash received | | — | | | (27,067) | | | (5,596) | |
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | | 15,057 |
|
| (37,085 | ) | | (6,374 | ) | |
| Other | | Other | | (549) | | | (1,786) | | | — | |
| Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | | Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | | (9,342) | | | (55,774) | | | 15,057 | |
| FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | |
|
|
| | | FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | |
| Payments on capital leases | | (108 | ) |
| (8 | ) | | (8 | ) | Payments on capital leases | | (358) | | | (157) | | | (108) | |
| Payments of contingent consideration for acquisitions | | (521 | ) |
| (774 | ) | | — |
| Payments of contingent consideration for acquisitions | | (3,101) | | | (888) | | | (521) | |
| Repurchase of common stock | | — |
|
| — |
| | (22,763 | ) | |
| Income tax benefit from exercise of stock options | | — |
|
| 357 |
| | 313 |
| |
| Proceeds from issuance of stock, net | | 3,594 |
|
| 674 |
| | 2,287 |
| |
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | 2,965 |
|
| 249 |
| | (20,171 | ) | |
| Payments for taxes related to net share settlement of equity awards | | Payments for taxes related to net share settlement of equity awards | | (2,199) | | | — | | | — | |
| Proceeds from issuance of stock related to stock option exercises | | Proceeds from issuance of stock related to stock option exercises | | 7,901 | | | 20,855 | | | 3,594 | |
| Net cash provided by financing activities | | Net cash provided by financing activities | | 2,243 | | | 19,810 | | | 2,965 | |
| EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | 6,414 |
|
| (1,934 | ) | | (3,420 | ) | EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | (518) | | | (2,536) | | | 6,414 | |
| INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | 34,791 |
|
| (1,187 | ) | | (1,933 | ) | INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | 24,851 | | | (32,177) | | | 34,791 | |
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR | | 106,169 |
|
| 107,356 |
| | 109,289 |
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR | | 108,783 | | | 140,960 | | | 106,169 | |
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR | | $ | 140,960 |
|
| $ | 106,169 |
| | $ | 107,356 |
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR | | $ | 133,634 | | | $ | 108,783 | | | $ | 140,960 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
FARO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017
(in thousands, except share and per share data or as otherwise noted)
1.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Description of Business—FARO Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively “FARO,” the “Company,” “us,” “we” or “our”) design, develop, manufacture, market and support software driven, three-dimensional (“3D”) measurement and imaging and realization systems.solutions. This technology permits high-precision 3D measurement, imaging and comparison of parts and complex structures within production and quality assurance processes. Our devices are used for inspection of components and assemblies, rapid prototyping, reverse engineering, documenting large volume or structures in 3D, surveying and construction, as well as for investigation and reconstruction of accident sites or crime scenes. We sell the majority of our products through a direct sales force across a broad number of customers in a range of manufacturing, industrial, architecture, surveying, building information modeling, construction, public safety forensics, cultural heritage, and other applications. Our FaroArm®FaroArm®, FARO ScanArm®, FARO Gage®, FARO Laser TrackerTM, FARO Cobalt Array Imager, FARO Laser Projector, and their companion CAM2®, BuildIT, and RayTracerBuildIT ProjectorTMsoftware solutions, provide for Computer-Aided Design (“CAD”) based inspection, factory-level statistical process control, high-density surveying, and laser-guided assembly and production. Together, these products integrate the measurement, quality inspection, and reverse engineering functions with CAD and 3D software to improve productivity, enhance product quality, and decrease rework and scrap in the manufacturing process, mainly supporting applications in our Factory Metrology vertical.the automotive, aerospace, metal and machine fabrication and other industrial manufacturing markets. Our FARO Focus and FARO Scanner Freestyle3DX laser scanners,ScanPlan, and their companion FARO SCENE, BuildIT, FARO PointSense,As-BuiltTM, and FARO Zone public safety forensics software offerings, are utilized for a wide variety of 3D modeling, documentation and high-density surveying applications primarily in our Construction Building Information Modeling-Construction Information Management (“Construction BIM-CIM”)the architecture, engineering and Public Safety Forensics verticals.construction and public safety markets. Our FARO ScanArm®, FARO Cobalt Array Imager, FARO Scanner Freestyle3DX laser scanners and theirits companion SCENE software also enable a fully digital workflow used to capture real world geometry for the purpose of empowering design, enabling innovation, and speeding up the design cycle, supporting our Productcycle.
Since the fourth quarter of 2016, we had operated in five verticals—3D Manufacturing, Construction Building Information Modeling (“Construction BIM”), Public Safety Forensics, 3D Design vertical. FARO Visual InspectTM enables large, complex and Photonics—and had three reporting segments—3D CAD data to be transferred to a tablet deviceManufacturing, Construction BIM and then used for mobile visualization and comparison to real world conditions, facilitating in-process inspection, assembly, guidance and positioning for applicationsEmerging Verticals. As discussed in our Factory MetrologyQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the third quarter of 2019, our new management team, led by our new Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), formulated and Construction BIM-CIM verticals.began to implement a new comprehensive strategic plan for our business. As part of our strategic planning process, we identified areas of our business that needed enhanced focus or change in order to improve our efficiency and cost structure. In the fourth quarter of 2019, we reassessed and redefined our go-to-market strategy, refocused our marketing engagement with our customers and re-evaluated our hardware product portfolio.
As part of our new strategic plan, and based on the recommendation of our CEO, who is also our Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”), in the fourth quarter of 2019, we eliminated our vertical structure and began reorganizing the Company into a functional structure. Our lineexecutive leadership team is now comprised of galvanometer-based scan headsfunctional leaders in areas such as sales, marketing, operations, research and laser scan controllersdevelopment and general and administrative, and resources are used inallocated to each function at a consolidated unit level. We no longer have separate business units, or segment managers or vertical leaders who report to the CODM with respect to operations, operating results or planning for levels or components below the total Company level. Instead, our CODM now allocates resources and evaluates performance on a Company-wide basis. Based on these changes, commencing with the fourth quarter of 2019, we are now reporting as one reporting segment that develops, manufactures, markets, supports and sells CAD-based quality assurance products integrated with CAD-based inspection and statistical process control software and 3D documentation systems. Our reporting segment sells into a variety of laser applicationsend markets, including automotive, aerospace, metal and are integrated into larger components and systems.
Reportable Segments—During fiscal 2016, we evaluated our reportable segment structure based on our new management organization and the changes implemented in connection with our initiatives to reorganize our business around certain vertical markets. As a result of this assessment, we report our activities in the following three reportable segments:
The Factory Metrology segment provides solutions for manual and automated measurement and inspection in an industrial or manufacturing environment. Applications include alignment, part inspection, dimensional analysis, first article inspection, incoming and in-process inspection, machine calibration, non-contact inspection, robot calibration, tool building and set-up, and assembly guidance.
The Construction BIM-CIM segment provides solutions for as-built data capturing and 3D visualization in building information modeling and construction information management applications, allowing our customers in ourfabrication, architecture, engineering, construction and construction markets to quickly and accurately extract 2D and 3D measurement points. Applications include as-built documentation, construction monitoring, surveying, asset and facility management, and heritage preservation.public safety.
The Other segment includes our Product Design, Public Safety Forensics and 3D Machine Vision operating segments. Our Product Design operating segment provides advanced 3D solutions to assist in the engineering or design of a movable object, enabling a full digital workflow for applications that include reverse engineering and virtual simulation. Our Public Safety Forensics operating segment provides solutions to public safety officials and professionals to capture environmental or situational scenes in 2D and 3D for crime, crash and fire scene investigations and environmental safety evaluations. Our 3D Machine Vision operating segment provides solutions to customers who require customized 3D measurement and realization solutions not otherwise addressed by our off-the-shelf product offerings.
All operating segments that do not meet the criteria to be reportable segments are aggregated in the Other category and have been combined based on the aggregation criteria and quantitative thresholds in accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 280, “Segment Reporting” (“FASB ASC Topic 280”). Our reportable segments have been determined in accordance with our internal management structure, which is based on operating activities. We evaluate business performance based upon several metrics, using profitable revenue growth and segment profit as the primary financial measure.
We report our segment information in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 280. See Note 16, “Segment Reporting” for further information.
Principles of Consolidation—Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of FARO Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. The financial statements of our foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars using exchange rates in effect at period-end for assets and liabilities and average exchange rates during each reporting period for results of operations. Adjustments resulting from financial statement translations are reflected as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive loss. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in net income (loss) income..
Revenue Recognition, Product Warranty and Extended Warranty Contracts—Revenue is recognized whenas performance obligations within a contract are satisfied in an amount that reflects the consideration we expect to receive in exchange for satisfaction of those performance obligations, or standalone selling price. Our contracts with customers may include multiple performance obligations. For such arrangements, we allocate revenues to each performance obligation based on its relative standalone selling price. We make this allocation estimate utilizing data from the sale of our applicable products and services to customers separately in similar circumstances, with the exception of software licenses. With respect to software licenses, we use the residual method for allocating the contract price is fixed, collectability is reasonably assured, the title and risks and rewards of ownership have passed to the customer, and the earnings process is complete.performance obligations relating to software licenses. Revenue related to our measurement imaging, and realizationimaging equipment and related software is generally recognized upon shipment from our facilities or when delivered to the customer's location, as determined by the agreed upon shipping terms, at which time we considerare entitled to payment and title and control has passed to the earnings process complete as of the shipping date. The related software sold with our equipment function together and deliver the tangible product’s essential functionality.customer. Fees billed to customers associated with the distribution of products are classified as revenue. We warrant our products against defects in design, materials and workmanship for one year. A provision for estimated future costs relating to warranty expense is recorded when products are shipped. We separately sell extended warranties. Extended warranty revenues are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the warranty. Costs relating to extended warranties are recognized as incurred. Revenue from sales of software only is recognized when no further significant production, modification or customization of the software is required and when the following criteria are met: persuasive evidencerisks and rewards of a sales agreement exists, delivery has occurred, andownership have passed to the sales price is fixed or determinable and deemed collectible.customer. These software arrangements generally include short-term maintenance that is considered post-contract support (“PCS”)., which is considered to be a separate performance obligation. We generally establish vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair valuea standalone sales price for this PCS component based on our maintenance renewal rate. Maintenance renewals, when sold, are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the maintenance agreement. Revenues resulting from sales of comprehensive support, training and technology consulting services are recognized as such services are performed and are deferred when billed in advance of the performance of services. Payment for products and services is collected within a short period of time following transfer of control or commencement of delivery of services, as applicable. Revenues are presented net of sales-related taxes.
Cash and Cash Equivalents—We consider cash on hand and amounts on deposit with financial institutions with maturities of three months or less when purchased to be cash and cash equivalents. We havehad deposits with foreign banks totaling $98.8$89.3 million and $87.3$77.5 million as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively.
Accounts Receivable and Related Allowance for Doubtful Accounts—Credit is extended to customers based on an evaluation of a customer’s financial condition and, generally, collateral is not required. Accounts receivable are generally due within 30 to 90 days and are stated at amounts due from customers, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. Accounts outstanding longer than the contractual payment terms are considered past due. We make judgments as to the collectability of accounts receivable based on historical trends and future expectations. Management estimates an allowance for doubtful accounts, which adjusts gross trade accounts receivable to itstheir net realizable value. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on an analysis of all receivables for possible impairment issues and historical write-off percentages. We write off accounts receivable when they become uncollectible, and payments subsequently received on such receivables are credited to the allowance for doubtful accounts. We do not generally charge interest on past due receivables.
Inventories—Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value using the first-in first-out (“FIFO”) method. Shipping and handling costs are classified as a component of cost of sales in the consolidated statements of operations. Sales demonstration inventory is comprised of measuring imaging and realizationimaging devices utilized by sales representatives to present our products to customers. Management expects sales demonstration inventory to be held by our sales representatives for up to three years, at which time it is refurbished and transferred to finished goods as used equipment, stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Management expects these refurbished units to remain in finished goods inventory and be sold within 12 months at prices that produce reduced gross margins. Sales demonstration inventory remains classified as inventory, as it is available for sale and any required refurbishment prior to sale is minimal.
Service inventory is typically used to provide a temporary replacement product to a customer covered by a premium warranty when the customer’s unit requires service or repair and as training equipment. Service inventory is available for sale; however, management does not expect service inventory to be sold within 12 months and, as such, classifies this inventory as a long-term asset. Service inventory that we utilize for training or repairs which we deem as no longer available for sale is transferred to fixed assets at the lower of cost or net realizable value and depreciated over its remaining useful life, typically three years. See Note 5, "Inventories"6, “Inventories” for further information regarding inventories.
Reserve for Excess and Obsolete Inventory—SinceBecause the value of inventory that will ultimately be realized cannot be known with exact certainty, we rely upon both past sales history and future sales forecasts to provide a basis for the determination of the reserve. Inventory is considered potentially obsolete if we have withdrawn those products from the market or had no sales of the product for the past 12 months and have no sales forecasted for the next 12 months. Inventory is considered potentially excess if the quantity on hand exceeds 12 months of expected remaining usage. The resulting potentially obsolete and excess parts are then reviewed to determine if a substitute usage or a future need exists. Items without an identified current or future usage are reserved in an amount equal to 100% of the FIFO cost of such inventory. Our products are subject to changes in technologies that may make certain of our products or their components obsolete or less competitive, which may increase our historical provisions to the reserve.
Property and Equipment—Property and equipment purchases exceeding aone thousand dollars are capitalized and recorded at cost. Depreciation is computed beginning on the date that the asset is placed into service using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the various classes of assets as follows:
|
| | | | |
| |
| Machinery, equipment and software | 2 to 5 years |
| Furniture and fixtures | 3 to 10 years |
Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lesser of the life of the asset or the remaining term of the lease.
Depreciation expense was $13.0 million, $12.9 million and $12.3 million $10.9 millionin 2019, 2018 and $9.2 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Accelerated methods of depreciation are used for income tax purposes in contrast to book purposes, and as a result, appropriate provisions are made for the related deferred income taxes. Balances of major classes of depreciable assets and total accumulated depreciation as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
| Property and equipment: | | | | |
| Machinery and equipment | | 83,900 | | | | 76,048 | |
| Furniture and fixtures | | 6,377 | | | | 6,749 | |
| Leasehold improvements | | 21,397 | | | | 20,304 | |
| Property and equipment at cost | | 111,674 | | | | 103,101 | |
| Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization | | (84,720) | | | | (72,684) | |
| Property and equipment, net | | 26,954 | | | | 30,417 | |
Business Combinations—We allocate the fair value of purchase consideration to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values at the acquisition date. The excess of the fair value of purchase consideration over the fair value of these assets acquired and liabilities assumed is recorded as goodwill. When determining the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, management makes significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets. Critical estimates in valuing intangible assets include, but are not limited to, expected future cash flows, which includesinclude consideration of future growth rates and margins, customer attrition rates, future changes in technology and brand awareness, loyalty and position, and discount rates. Critical estimates are also made in valuing earn-outs, which represent arrangements to pay former owners based on the satisfaction of performance criteria. Fair value estimates are based on the assumptions management believes a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability. Amounts recorded in a business combination may change during the measurement period, which is a period not to exceed one year from the date of acquisition, as additional information about conditions existing at the acquisition date becomes available.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets—Goodwill represents the excess cost of a business acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired. We do not amortize goodwill; however, we perform an annual review each year, or more frequently if indicators of potential impairment exist (i.e., that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying value), to determine if the carrying value of the recorded goodwill or indefinite lived intangible assets is impaired.
We have historically evaluatedchanged the timing of our annual test of goodwill during 2019 to align with our updated strategic plan and annual budgetary process. Accordingly, we performed our annual quantitative test for impairment annuallyof our recorded goodwill as of December 31, or when an indicator of impairment exists. During 2017, we changed the date of annual impairment assessment for our reporting units to October 1. This voluntary change in the annual goodwill testing date is a change in accounting policy, which we concluded is preferable as it better aligns the timing of the assessment with our annual budgeting process. This change in the date of the annual impairment assessment was applied prospectively and did not accelerate, delay or avoid a potential impairment charge. If an asset is impaired, the difference between the value of the asset reflected in the financial statements and its current fair value is recognized as an expense in the period in which the impairment occurs. See Note 6, "Goodwill" and Note 7, "Intangible Assets" for further information regarding goodwill and intangible assets, respectively.
Each period, and for any of our reporting units, we can elect to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. If we believe, as10, 2019. As a result of our qualitative assessment, that it is not more likely than not thatthis test, the estimated fair value of aeach of the Photonics reporting unit, containingwhich included goodwill isrecognized with the Instrument Associates, LLC d/b/a Nutfield Technology (“Nutfield”), Laser Control Systems Limited (“Laser Control Systems”) and Lanmark Controls, Inc. (“Lanmark”) acquisitions, and the 3D Design reporting unit, which included goodwill recognized with the acquisition of Opto-Tech SRL and its subsidiary Open Technologies SRL (collectively, “Open Technologies”), were determined to be significantly less than itsthe carrying amount, then the first and second steps of the quantitative goodwill impairment test are unnecessary. If we elect to bypass the qualitative assessment option, or if the qualitative assessment was performed and resulted in the Company being unable to conclude that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of asuch reporting unit, containing goodwill is greater than its carrying amount, we will perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. We perform the first step of the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test by calculating the fair value of the reporting unit usingindicating a discounted cash flow method and market approach method, and then comparing the respective fair value with the carrying amount of the reporting unit. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, we perform the second step of the quantitative goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of thefull impairment. This $21.2 million impairment loss if any.was driven primarily by historical and projected financial performance lower than our expectations and changes in our go-forward strategy in connection with our new strategic plan. Management has concluded there was no0 goodwill impairment for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162018 and 2015.2017. See Note 7, “Goodwill” for further information regarding goodwill.
Other intangible assets principally include patents, existing product technology and customer relationships that arose in connection with our acquisitions. Other intangible assets are recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition and are amortized over their estimated useful lives of 3 to 20 years. As of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, there were no0 indefinite-lived intangible assets.
Product technology and patents are recorded at cost. Amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the lives of the product technology and patents of 7 to 20 years.
The remaining weighted-average amortization period for all our intangible assets is eight4 years.
Long-Lived Assets—Long-lived assets, otherAs a result of historical and projected financial performance lower than goodwill, are evaluated for impairment when events orour expectations and changes in business circumstances indicate thatour go-forward strategy in connection with our new strategic plan, the carrying amountestimated fair value of an asset group may notacquired intangibles recognized with the Nutfield, Laser Control Systems, Lanmark and Open Technologies acquisitions were determined to be fully recoverable, comparing projected undiscounted future cash flows toless than the carrying value of the asset group. Management has concluded that there were no indicatorsnet carrying value for such assets. We recognized an impairment charge related to such acquired intangibles of impairment of these assets during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.$10.5 million in 2019. See Note 8, “Intangible Assets” for further information regarding intangible assets.
Research and Development—Research and development costs incurred in the discovery of new knowledge and the resulting translation of this new knowledge into plans and designs for new products prior to the attainment of the related products’ technological feasibility are recorded as expenses in the period incurred. To date, the time incurred between the attainment of the related products' technological feasibility and general release to customers has been short.
Reserve for Warranties—We establish at the time of sale a liability for the one year-year warranty included with the initial purchase price of our products, based upon an estimate of the repair expenses likely to be incurred for the warranty period. The warranty period is measured in installation-months for each major product group. The warranty reserve is included in accrued liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The warranty expense is estimated by applying the actual total repair expenses for each product group in the prior period and determining a rate of repair expense per installation-month. This repair rate is multiplied by the number of installation-months of warranty for each product group to determine the provision for warranty expenses for the period. We evaluate our exposure to warranty costs at the end of each period using the estimated expense per installation-month for each major product group, the number of units remaining under warranty, and the remaining number of months each unit will be under warranty. We have a history of new product introductions and enhancements to existing products, which may result in unforeseen issues that increase our warranty costs. While such expenses have historically been within expectations, we cannot guarantee this will continue in the future.
Income Taxes—We review our deferred tax assets on a regular basis to evaluate their recoverability based upon expected future reversals of deferred tax assets and liabilities, projections of future taxable income, and tax planning strategies that we might employ to utilize such assets, including net operating loss carryforwards. Based on the positive and negative evidence for recoverability, we establish a valuation allowance against the net deferred tax assets of a taxing jurisdiction in which we operate unless it is “more likely than not” that we will recover such assets through the above means. In the future, ourOur evaluation of the need for the valuation allowance will beis significantly influenced by our ability to maintain profitability and our ability to predict and achieve future projections of taxable income over at least a two-year period.income.
We recognize tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. For those positions where it is not more likely than not that a tax benefit will be sustained, no tax benefit has been recognized in the financial statements. In the ordinary course of business, we are examined by various federal, state, and foreign tax authorities. We regularly assess the potential outcomes of these examinations and any future examinations for the current or prior years in determining the adequacy of our provision for income taxes. See Note 11, "Income Taxes"12, “Income Taxes” for further information regarding income taxes.
(Loss) Earnings Per Share (EPS)(“EPS”)—Basic (loss) earnings per share is computed by dividing net (loss)(income) income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed by also considering the impact of potential common stock on both net income and the weighted average number of shares outstanding. Our potential common stock consists of employee stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance-based awards. Our potential common stock is excluded from the basic earnings per share calculation and is included in the diluted earnings per share calculation when doing so would not be anti-dilutive. Performance-based awards are included in the computation of diluted earnings per share only to the extent that the underlying performance conditions (and any applicable market condition) (i) are satisfied as of the end of the reporting period or (ii) would be considered satisfied if the end of the reporting period were the end of the related contingency period and the result would be dilutive under the treasury stock method. When we report a loss for the period presented, the diluted loss per share calculation does not include our potential common stock, as the inclusion of these shares in the calculation would have an anti-dilutive effect. A reconciliation of the number of common shares used in the calculation of basic and diluted EPS is presented in Note 14,15, “(Loss) Earnings Per Share.”
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—We have two2 stock-based employee and director compensation plans, which are described more fully in Note 13,14, “Stock Compensation Plans.”
We measure and record compensation expense using the applicable accounting guidance for share-based payments related to stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance-based awards granted to our directors and employees. The fair value of stock options, including performance awards, without a market condition is estimated, at the date of grant, using the Black-Scholes option-pricingoption-valuation model. The fair value of restricted stock unit awards and stock options with a market condition is estimated, at the date of grant, using the Monte Carlo Simulation valuation model. The Black-Scholes and Monte Carlo Simulation valuation models incorporate assumptions as to stock price volatility, the expected life of options or awards, a risk-free interest rate and dividend yield. In valuing our stock options, significant judgment is required in determining the expected volatility of our common stock and the expected life that individuals will hold their stock options prior to exercising. Expected volatility for stock options is based on the historical and implied volatility of our own common stock while the volatility for our restricted stock units with a market condition is based on the historical volatility of our own stock and the stock of companies within our defined peer group. The expected life of stock options is derived from the historical actual term of option grants and an estimate of future exercises during the remaining contractual period of the option. While volatility and estimated life are assumptions that do not bear the risk of change subsequent to the grant date of stock options, these assumptions may be difficult to measure as they represent future expectations based on historical experience. Further, our expected volatility and expected life may change in the future, which could substantially change the grant-date fair value of future awards of stock options and, ultimately, the expense we record. The fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock units, including performance awards, without a market condition is estimated using the current market price of our common stock on the date of grant.
We expense stock-based compensation for stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and performance awards over the requisite service period. For awards with only a service condition, we expense stock-based compensation using the straight-line method over the requisite service period for the entire award. For awards with both performance and service conditions, we expense the stock-based compensation on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award, taking into account the probability that we will satisfy the performance conditions. Furthermore, we expense awards with a market condition over the three-yearthree-year vesting period regardless of the value that the award recipients ultimately receive. Effective January 1, 2017, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2016-09”), simplifying several aspects of the accounting forAll income tax-related cash flows resulting from share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classifications of awardspayments are reported as either equity or liabilities, and classification onoperating activities in the statement of cash flows. The impacts of adopting ASU 2016-09 are described more fully withinflows in the Impact of Recently Adopted Accounting Standards section below.deferred income tax benefit line item. We elect to account for forfeitures related to the service condition-based awards as they occur.
Concentration of Credit Risk—Financial instruments that expose us to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of short-term investments and operating demand deposit accounts. Our policy is to place our operating demand deposit accounts with high credit quality financial institutions, the balances of which at times may exceed federally insured limits. We continually monitor our banking relationships and believe we are not exposed to any significant credit risk on our operating demand deposit accounts.
Estimates—The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Impact of Recently Adopted Accounting Standards—In January 2017,February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU"(“ASU”) No. 2017-01, Business Combinations2016-02, Leases (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business842) (“ASU 2017-01”) in order to clarify the definition of a business and provide additional guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. Currently, ASC Topic 805 recognizes three elements of a business: inputs, processes, and outputs. While an integrated set of assets and activities (collectively referred to as a “set”) that is a business usually has outputs, outputs are not required to be present. Additionally, all the inputs and processes that a seller uses in operating a set are not required if market participants can acquire the set and continue to produce outputs. ASU 2017-01 provides a screen to determine when a set is not a business. The screen requires that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business. If the screen is not met, the new guidance (1) requires that to be considered a business, a set must include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create output and (2) removes the evaluation of whether a market participant could replace missing elements. The new guidance provides a framework to assist entities in evaluating whether both an input and a substantive process are present. This framework includes two sets of criteria to consider that depend on whether a set has outputs. Although outputs are not required for a set to be a business, outputs generally are a key element of a business. ASU 2017-01 provides more stringent criteria for sets without outputs and more narrowly defines the term output. ASU 2017-01 became effective for us on January 1, 2018 and was applied prospectively. Our adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other than Inventory (“ASU 2016-16”2016-02”), which removesis intended to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the prohibition in ASC 740 againstbalance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements to enable users of financial statements to assess the immediate recognition of the current and deferred income tax effects of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. This ASU requires the tax effects of intercompany transactions, other than sales of inventory, to be recognized when the transfer occurs, instead of deferred until the transferred asset is sold to a third party or otherwise recovered through use of the asset. The new guidance must be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption and is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim period therein. ASU 2016-16 became effective for us on January 1, 2018 and was applied on a modified retrospective basis. Our adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”), which clarifies how companies present and classify certain cash receipts and cash payments in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 became effective for us on January 1, 2018 and was applied on a modified retrospective basis. Our adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers:(Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”), amending its accounting guidance related to revenue recognition. Under this ASU and subsequently issued amendments, revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Additional disclosures are required to provide the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgmentsleases. ASU No. 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, was issued by the FASB in July 2018 and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfillallows for a contract.
cumulative-effect adjustment transition method of adoption. We have evaluated the effect that this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements by analyzing both transactional and analytical data for each of our revenue streams. The following is a status of our evaluation of impacts by significant revenue stream:
• Measurement equipment and related software: Under the prior accounting guidance, sales of measurement, imaging and realization equipment and related software sales were generally recognized upon shipment, as we considered the earnings process completeadopted ASU 2016-02 effective as of January 1, 2019 utilizing the shipping date. The related software sold with our measurement, imaging and realization equipment functions together with such equipment to delivercumulative-effect adjustment transition method of adoption, which resulted in the tangible product’s essential functionality. Our adoption of the new guidance did not result in material changes to our accounting for revenue related to our measurement, imaging and realization equipment and related software.
• Extended warranties: Under the prior accounting guidance, extended warranty sales were recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the warranty. Our adoption of the new guidance did not result in material changes to our accounting for revenue related to extended warranties.
• Software: Under the prior accounting guidance, software only sales were recognized when no further significant production, modification or customization of the software was required and when the following criteria were met: persuasive evidence of a sales agreement existed, delivery had occurred, and the sales price was fixed or determinable and deemed collectible. These software arrangements generally include short-term maintenance that is considered post-contract support. Maintenance renewals, when sold, were recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the maintenance agreement. Our adoption of the new guidance did not result in material changes to our accounting for revenue related to software only sales and maintenance renewals.
Under the prior accounting guidance, we recognized sales commission expense as incurred. Under the new guidance, we will capitalize the commission expense for those sales arrangements that extend beyond one year and amortize such costs ratably over the term of the contract. As a result, we will recognize a deferred cost assetrecognition on our consolidated balance sheet uponas of December 31, 2019 of $18.4 million of right-of-use assets for operating leases, $19.6 million of lease liability for operating leases, $0.8 million of property and equipment, net for finance leases and $0.8 million of lease liability for finance leases under which we function as a lessee. We elected certain practical expedients available under the transition provisions to (i) allow aggregation of non-lease components with the related lease components when evaluating accounting treatment, (ii) apply the modified retrospective adoption method, utilizing the simplified transition option, which allows us to continue to apply the legacy guidance in FASB ASC Topic 840, including its disclosure requirements, in the comparative periods presented in the year of adoption, and (iii) use hindsight in determining the new guidance; however,lease term (that is, when considering our options to extend or terminate the impactlease and to purchase the underlying asset) and in assessing impairment of this change on our consolidated balance sheet is not material.right-of-use assets. The adoption of the new guidance didASU 2016-02 also required us to include any initial direct costs, which are incremental costs that would not have a material change to our results of operations or cash flows. We adopted this guidance utilizingbeen incurred had the modified retrospective method but are applying it only to contracts that arelease not completed as of the date of initial adoption, an option that is available under ASC Topic 606.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2016-09”), which is intended to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 became effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods therein (our fiscal year 2017). We adopted ASU 2016-09 effective January 1, 2017. Under the new guidance, excess tax benefits that were not previously recognized because the related tax deduction had not reduced current taxes payable are to be recorded on a modified retrospective basis. This is achieved through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period in which the new guidance is adopted. Historically, we recognized all excess tax benefits when an option was exercised or a share vested since we did not have a U.S. net operating loss carryforward. Therefore, the tax benefit will be allowed under the current guidance and no adjustment to retained earnings is required.
Under the new guidance, all tax-related cash flows resulting from share-based payments are reported as operating activitiesbeen obtained, in the statementright-of-use assets. The recognition of cash flows. Effective January 1, 2017, we adopted this portion of the guidance on a prospective basis. This approach incorporates the net of the inflow and outflow from all tax-related cash flows resulting from share-based paymentsthese costs in the deferred income tax (benefit) expense line item and presents it alongconnection with other income tax cash flows as operating activities in the statement of cash flows.
We also elected to account for forfeitures related to the service condition-based awards as they occur effective January 1, 2017, which is a change from our treatment of estimating forfeitures in previous years. However, we continue to assess performance condition-based awards quarterly as required. In adopting the new policy using a modified retrospective approach, we assessed the cumulative effect adjustment and recorded to retaining earnings the difference between the amount of compensation cost previously recorded and the amount that would have been recorded without assuming forfeitures. The cumulative effect adjustment recorded to retained earnings was not material. We will continue to assess the impact of the adopted guidance on a quarterly basis and do not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory (“ASU 2015-11”), which changes the measurement principle for inventory from the lower of cost or market to the lower of cost and net realizable value. ASU 2015-11 defines net realizable value as estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. The new guidance must be applied on a prospective basis. We adopted ASU 2015-11 effective January 1, 2017. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes (“ASU 2015-17”), which requires that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as non-current in a classified balance sheet. ASU 2015-17 became effective for us on January 1, 2017. We adopted this guidance on a retrospective basis, which resulted in the reclassification of current deferred tax assets totaling approximately $7.6 million as of December 31, 2016 from current to non-current in our consolidated financial statements.
Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards—In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangible - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (“ASU 2017-04”), which is intended to simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Under the current guidance, performance of Step 2 requires us to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill by following procedures that would be required to determine the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Under the new guidance, we will perform our goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An impairment charge will beis recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value up to the amount of the goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. The new guidance also eliminates the requirements for any reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it fails the qualitative assessment. As a result, all reporting units will be subject to the same impairment assessment. We will still have the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitativeadopted this guidance in connection with our annual impairment test is necessary. ASU 2017-04 becomes effective for annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted for annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests after January 1, 2017. The amendments in this ASU will be applied on a prospective basis. Disclosure of the nature and reason for the change in accounting principle is required upon transition. This disclosure is required in the first annual period and in the interim period within the first annual period when we initially adopt the amendments in this ASU. We plan to adopt this guidance for our fiscal year endingended December 31, 2020. We do not expect that the2019. The adoption of this guidance willdid not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards—In FebruaryJune 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, LeasesNo. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 842)326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-02”2016-13”), which is intendedrequires the measurement and recognition of expected credit losses for financial assets held at amortized cost. ASU 2016-13, and subsequent related amendments to increase transparencyASU 2016-13, replace the existing incurred loss impairment model with an expected loss model that requires the use of forward-looking information to calculate credit loss estimates. It also eliminates the concept of other-than-temporary impairment and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangementsrequires credit losses related to enable users of financial statementsavailable-for-sale debt securities to assess the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. ASU 2016-02 must be applied onrecorded through an allowance for credit losses rather than as a modified retrospective basis and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. We plan to adopt ASU 2016-02reduction in the first quarteramortized cost basis of 2019. Although we arethe securities. These changes will result in the processearlier recognition of evaluatingcredit losses. We adopted ASU 2016-13 effective as of January 1, 2020, and the impact of adoption of this ASUthe new guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements, we currently believe the most significant changes will be related to the recognition of new right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on our balance sheet for real estate operating leases.statements.
Reclassifications—Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified in the accompanying consolidated financial statements to conform to the current period presentation. For example:presentation:
Deferred income tax assets, net•Depreciation and amortization expenses are being reported in the accompanying statements of operations to reflect departmental costs. Previously, those expenses were reclassified from current to non-current in our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016reported as a result of adopting ASU No. 2015-17.
Certain reclassifications were made between reporting segmentsseparate line item under operating expenses. Amounts related to depreciation and amortization expenses for segment profit during the yearyears ended December 31, 20162018 and 2017 have been restated throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K to reflect this reclassification of depreciation and amortization expenses and to conform to the current period presentation, as set forth in Note 16, “Segment Reporting”the following tables;
•Selling and marketing expenses and general and administrative expenses are now being reported in the accompanying statements of operations together in one line as Selling, general and administrative. Previously, those expenses were reported as two separate line items under operating expenses. Amounts related to selling, general and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 have been restated throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K to reflect this reclassification of selling, general and administrative expenses and to conform to the current period presentation, as set forth in the following tables;
•Software maintenance revenue is now being reported in the accompanying statements of operations as a resultcomponent of changesproduct sales. Previously, these revenues were reported in service sales. Amounts related to our methodologysoftware maintenance sales for allocating manufacturing variancesthe years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 have been restated throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K to our segments. These reclassifications only impacted our segment reporting footnote disclosure.reflect this reclassification of software maintenance sales and to conform to the current period presentation, as set forth in the following tables; and
•Software maintenance cost of sales is now being reported in the accompanying statements of operations as a component of product cost of sales. Previously, these cost of sales was reported in service cost of sales. Amounts related to software maintenance cost of sales for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 have been restated throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K to reflect this reclassification of software maintenance cost of sales and to conform to the current period presentation, as set forth in the following tables.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the twelve months ended December 31, 2018: | | | | | | | | | |
| As Reported | | Depreciation and Amortization Adjustment | | Selling, General and Administrative Adjustment | | Software Maintenance Adjustment | | As Adjusted |
| Sales | | | | | | | | | |
| Product | $ | 311,102 | | | | $ | — | | | | $ | — | | | | $ | 9,482 | | | | $ | 320,584 | |
| Service | 92,525 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (9,482) | | | | 83,043 | |
| Total sales | $ | 403,627 | | | | $ | — | | | | $ | — | | | | $ | — | | | | $ | 403,627 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Cost of Sales | | | | | | | | | |
| Product | $ | 124,802 | | | | $ | 3,406 | | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,668 | | | $ | 130,876 | |
| Service | 50,480 | | | | 3,386 | | | | — | | | (2,668) | | | 51,198 | |
| Total cost of sales | $ | 175,282 | | | | $ | 6,792 | | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 182,074 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operating Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Selling, general and administrative | $ | — | | | $ | 5,145 | | | $ | 164,572 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 169,717 | |
| Selling and marketing | 116,920 | | | | — | | | | (116,920) | | | | — | | | | — | |
| General and administrative | 47,652 | | | | — | | | | (47,652) | | | | — | | | | — | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 18,313 | | | | (18,313) | | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Research and development | 39,706 | | | | 6,376 | | | | — | | | — | | | 46,082 | |
| Total operating expenses | $ | 222,591 | | | | $ | (6,792) | | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 215,799 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the twelve months ended December 31, 2017: | | | | | | | | | |
| As Reported | | Depreciation and Amortization Adjustment | | Selling, General and Administrative Adjustment | | Software Maintenance Adjustment | | As Adjusted |
| Sales | | | | | | | | | |
| Product | $ | 277,922 | | | | $ | — | | | | $ | — | | | | $ | 9,326 | | | | $ | 287,248 | |
| Service | 82,995 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (9,326) | | | | 73,669 | |
| Total sales | $ | 360,917 | | | | $ | — | | | | $ | — | | | | $ | — | | | | $ | 360,917 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Cost of Sales | | | | | | | | | |
| Product | $ | 110,143 | | | | $ | 3,254 | | | | $ | — | | | | $ | 2,364 | | | | $ | 115,761 | |
| Service | 46,137 | | | | 2,701 | | | | — | | | | (2,364) | | | | 46,474 | |
| Total cost of sales | $ | 156,280 | | | | $ | 5,955 | | | | $ | — | | | | $ | — | | | | $ | 162,235 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operating Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Selling, general and administrative | $ | — | | | | $ | 4,948 | | | | $ | 147,351 | | | | $ | — | | | | $ | 152,299 | |
| Selling and marketing | 103,544 | | | | — | | | | (103,544) | | | | — | | | | — | |
| General and administrative | 43,807 | | | | — | | | | (43,807) | | | | — | | | | — | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 16,588 | | | | (16,588) | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| Research and development | 35,376 | | | | 5,685 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 41,061 | |
| Total operating expenses | $ | 199,315 | | | | $ | (5,955) | | | | $ | — | | | | $ | — | | | | $ | 193,360 | |
2. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Selected cash payments and non-cash activities were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Years ended December 31, | | | | |
| | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Supplemental cash flow information: | | | | | | |
| Cash paid for interest | | $ | 6 | | | $ | 4 | | | $ | 9 | |
| Cash paid for income taxes | | $ | 5,498 | | | $ | 5,813 | | | $ | 2,488 | |
| Supplemental noncash investing and financing activities: | | | | | | |
| Transfer of service and sales demonstration inventory to fixed assets | | $ | 3,044 | | | $ | 964 | | | $ | 2,844 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Years ended December 31, |
| | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Supplemental cash flow information: | | | | | | |
| Cash paid for interest | | $ | 9 |
| | $ | 28 |
| | $ | 55 |
|
| Cash paid for income taxes | | $ | 2,488 |
| | $ | 2,576 |
| | $ | 4,682 |
|
| Supplemental noncash investing and financing activities: | | | | | | |
| Transfer of service and sales demonstration inventory to fixed assets | | $ | 2,844 |
| | $ | 511 |
| | $ | 2,979 |
|
The following tables present our revenues by sales type as presented in our consolidated statements of operations disaggregated by the timing of transfer of goods or services (in thousands):
3. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years ended December 31, | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Product Sales | | | | | | |
| Products transferred to a customer at a point in time | | $ | 277,841 | | | $ | 311,102 | | | $ | 277,922 | |
| Products transferred to a customer over time | | 11,838 | | | 9,482 | | | 9,326 | |
| | $ | 289,679 | | | $ | 320,584 | | | $ | 287,248 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years ended December 31, | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Service Sales | | | | | | |
| Service transferred to a customer at a point in time | | $ | 48,593 | | | $ | 42,932 | | | $ | 36,164 | |
| Service transferred to a customer over time | | 43,493 | | | 40,111 | | | 37,505 | |
| | $ | 92,086 | | | $ | 83,043 | | | $ | 73,669 | |
The following table presents our revenues disaggregated by geography, based on the billing addresses of our customers (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years ended December 31, | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Total Sales to External Customers | | | | | | | | | |
| United States | | $ | 151,646 | | | $ | 156,242 | | | $ | 141,595 | |
EMEA (1) | | 122,279 | | | 127,261 | | | 115,061 | |
Other APAC (1) | | 60,796 | | | 68,908 | | | 60,325 | |
| China | | 32,934 | | | 36,130 | | | 30,405 | |
Other Americas (1) | | 14,110 | | | 15,086 | | | 13,531 | |
| | $ | 381,765 | | | $ | 403,627 | | | $ | 360,917 | |
(1) Regions represent Europe, the Middle East, and Africa (EMEA); Asia-Pacific, excluding China (Other APAC); and Canada, Mexico, and Brazil (Other Americas).
For revenue related to our measurement and imaging equipment and related software, we allocate the contract price to performance obligations based on our best estimate of the standalone selling price. We make this allocation estimate utilizing data from the sale of our applicable products and services to customers separately in similar circumstances, with the exception of software licenses. With respect to software licenses, we use the residual method for allocating the contract price to performance obligations relating to software licenses. Revenue related to our measurement and imaging equipment and related software is generally recognized upon shipment from our facilities or when delivered to the customer location, as determined by the agreed upon shipping terms, at which time we are entitled to payment and title and control has passed to the customer. Software arrangements generally include short-term maintenance that is considered PCS, which is considered to be a separate performance obligation. We generally establish a standalone sales price for this PCS component based on our maintenance renewal rate. Maintenance renewals, when sold, are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the maintenance agreement. Payment for products and services is collected within a short period of time following transfer of control or commencement of delivery of services, as applicable.
Further, customers frequently purchase extended warranties with the purchase of measurement equipment and related software. Warranties are considered a performance obligation when services are transferred to a customer over time and as such, we recognize revenue on a straight-line basis over the warranty term. Extended warranty sales include contract periods that extend between one month and three years.
We capitalize commission expenses related to deliverables transferred to a customer over time and amortize such costs ratably over the term of the contract. As of December 31, 2019, the deferred cost asset related to deferred commissions was approximately $3.1 million. For classification purposes, $2.1 million and $1.0 million are comprised within the Prepaid expenses and other current assets and Other long-term assets, respectively, on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2019. As of December 31, 2018, the deferred cost asset related to deferred commissions was approximately $2.7 million. For classification purposes, $1.8 million and $0.9 million are comprised within the Prepaid expenses and other current assets and Other long-term assets, respectively, on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018.
The unearned service revenue liabilities reported on our consolidated balance sheets reflect the contract liabilities to satisfy the remaining performance obligations for extended warranties and software maintenance. The current portion of unearned service revenues on our consolidated balance sheets is what we expect to recognize to revenue within twelve months after the applicable balance sheet date relating to extended warranty and software maintenance contract liabilities. The Unearned service revenues - less current portion on our consolidated balance sheets is what we expect to recognize to revenue extending beyond twelve months after the applicable balance sheet date relating to extended warranty and software maintenance contract liabilities. Customer deposits on our consolidated balance sheets represent customer prepayments on contracts for performance obligations that we must satisfy in the future to recognize the related contract revenue. These amounts are generally related to performance obligations which are delivered in less than 12 months. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we recognized $30.2 million of service revenue that was deferred on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we recognized $25.0 million of service revenue that was deferred on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2017.
The nature of certain of our contracts gives rise to variable consideration, primarily related to an allowance for sales returns. We are required to estimate the contract asset related to sales returns and record a corresponding adjustment to Cost of Sales. Our allowance for sales returns was approximately $0.1 million as of both December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.
Shipping and handling fees billed to customers in a sales transaction are recorded in Product Sales and shipping and handling costs incurred are recorded in Cost of Sales. We exclude from Sales any value-added, sales and other taxes that we collect concurrently with revenue-producing activities.
4. ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
Activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Years ended December 31, | | | | |
| | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Balance, beginning of year | | $ | 1,748 | | | $ | 1,957 | | | $ | 1,829 | |
| Provision (net of recovery) | | 2,090 | | | 907 | | | 370 | |
| Amounts written off, net of recoveries | | (389) | | | (1,116) | | | (242) | |
| Balance, end of year | | $ | 3,449 | | | $ | 1,748 | | | $ | 1,957 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Years ended December 31, |
| | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Balance, beginning of year | | $ | 1,829 |
| | $ | 1,417 |
| | $ | 1,844 |
|
| Provision (net of recovery) | | 370 |
| | 898 |
| | 346 |
|
| Amounts written off, net of recoveries | | (242 | ) | | (486 | ) | | (773 | ) |
| Balance, end of year | | $ | 1,957 |
| | $ | 1,829 |
| | $ | 1,417 |
|
4.5. SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS
Short-term investments at December 31, 2017 consisted2019 were comprised of U.SU.S. Treasury Bills totaling $11.0$24.8 million, that matured through Januaryconsisting of $8.9 million maturing on March 12, 2020 and $15.9 million maturing on June 11, 2018.2020. The interest rates on the U.S. Treasury Bills held on December 31, 2019 and maturing on March 12, 2020 and June 11, 2020 are 1.8%, and 1.4%, respectively. Short-term investments at December 31, 2016 consisted2018 were comprised of U.S. Treasury Bills totaling $42.9$24.8 million, consisting of $9.0 million that matured throughon March 14, 2019, $10.9 million that matured on June 15, 2017.6, 2019 and $4.9 million that matured on June 20, 2019. The interest raterates on the U.S. Treasury Bills is less than one percent.held on December 31, 2018 that matured on March 14, 2019, June 6, 2019, and June 20, 2019 were 2.2%, 2.4% and 2.3%, respectively. The investments are classified as held-to-maturity and recorded at cost plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value. We do not intend to sell our short-termthese investments, and it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell suchthe investments before recovery ofwe recover their amortized cost bases, which may be maturity. The fair valuebases.
5.6. INVENTORIES
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value using the first-in first-out (FIFO) method. We have three principal categories of inventory: 1) manufactured product to be sold; 2) sales demonstration inventory - completed product used to support our sales force, for demonstrations and demonstrations;held for sale; and 3) service inventory - completed product and parts used to support our service department.department and held for sale. Shipping and handling costs are classified as a component of cost of sales in our consolidated statements of operations. Sales demonstration inventory is held by our sales representatives for up to three years, at which time it is refurbished and transferred to finished goods as used equipment, stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Management expectsWe expect these refurbished units to remain in finished goods inventory and to be sold within 12 months at prices that produce reduced gross margins. Service inventory is used to provide a temporary replacement product to a customer covered by a premium warranty when the customer’s unit requires service or repair and as training equipment. Service inventory is available for sale; however, management does not expect service inventory to be sold within 12 months and, as such, classifies this inventory as a long-term asset. Service inventory that we utilize for training or repairs and which we deem as no longer available for sale is transferred to fixed assets at the lower of cost or net realizable value and depreciated over the remaining life, typically three years.
Inventories consist of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
| Raw materials | | $ | 36,956 | | | $ | 39,859 | |
| Finished goods | | 21,598 | | | 25,585 | |
| Inventories, net | | $ | 58,554 | | | $ | 65,444 | |
| Service and sales demonstration inventory, net | | $ | 33,349 | | | $ | 39,563 | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
| Raw materials | | $ | 36,328 |
| | $ | 36,760 |
|
| Finished goods | | 17,458 |
| | 15,126 |
|
| Inventories, net | | $ | 53,786 |
| | $ | 51,886 |
|
| Service and sales demonstration inventory, net | | $ | 39,614 |
| | $ | 29,136 |
|
6.7. GOODWILL
OurWe had approximately $49.7 million and $67.3 million of goodwill atas of December 31, 20172019 and 2016 is related to our acquisitions. 2018, respectively. Changes in these balances are shown below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in thousands) | | | December 31, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
| Goodwill, beginning | | | $ | 67,274 | | | $ | 52,750 | |
| Recognized goodwill | | | 4,443 | | | 16,423 | |
| Impairment of goodwill | | | (21,233) | | | — | |
| Foreign currency translation | | | (780) | | | (1,899) | |
| Goodwill, ending | | | $ | 49,704 | | | $ | 67,274 | |
We evaluate each reporting unit’s fair value as compared to its carrying value on October 1st of each yeartest goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently if eventsan event occurs or changes in circumstances would indicate that the carrying value may exceed the fair value. Prior to 2017, we evaluated each reporting unit's fair value as compared to its carrying value on December 31, 2017. During Step 1 of the quantitative goodwill impairment test,it is more likely than not the fair value of the reporting unitsunit is measured using a discounted cash flow model incorporating discount rates commensurateless than the carrying value. We changed the timing of our annual test of goodwill during 2019 to align with our updated strategic plan and annual budgetary process. Accordingly, in connection with the risks involvedpreparation of our financial statements for each reporting unitthe quarter and a market approach. The key assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model include discount rates, growth rates, cash flow projections and terminal value rates. These rates are susceptible to change and require significant management judgment. The market approach relies on an analysisyear ended December 31, 2019, we performed our annual quantitative test for impairment of publicly-traded companies similar to us and derives a rangeour recorded goodwill as of revenue and profit multiples. The publicly-traded companies used in the market approach are selected based on our defined peer group. The resulting multiples are then applied to each reporting unit to determine fair value. Impairments to goodwill are charged against earnings in the period the impairment is identified.
During 2016, we realigned our organizational structure to focus on five operating segments: Factory Metrology, Construction BIM-CIM, Product Design, Public Safety Forensics, and 3D Machine Vision.December 10, 2019. As a result of this test, the changeestimated fair value of each of the Photonics reporting unit, which included goodwill recognized with the Nutfield, Laser Control Systems and Lanmark acquisitions, and the 3D Design reporting unit, which included goodwill recognized with the Open Technologies acquisition, were determined to be less than the carrying value of such reporting unit, indicating a full impairment. This impairment was driven primarily by historical and projected financial performance lower than our operating segments in 2016, we realigned our reporting units for which goodwill was tested as of December 31, 2016: Factory Metrology, Construction BIM-CIM and Public Safety Forensics as shown in the table below.
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, we did not have any goodwill that was identified as impaired. The increase in goodwill during 2017 and 2016 reflected the acquisitions completed in those periodsexpectations and changes in foreign exchange rates.our go-forward strategy in connection with our new strategic plan.
As part of our new strategic plan, and based on the recommendation of our CEO, who is also our CODM, in the fourth quarter of 2019, we eliminated our vertical structure and began reorganizing the Company into a functional structure. Our executive leadership team is now comprised of functional leaders in areas such as sales, marketing, operations, research and development and general and administrative, and resources are allocated to each function at a consolidated unit level. We no longer have separate business units, or segment managers or vertical leaders who report to the CODM with respect to operations, operating results or planning for levels or components below the total Company level. Instead, our CODM now allocates resources and evaluates performance on a Company-wide basis. Based on these changes, commencing with the fourth quarter of 2019, we are now reporting as one reporting segment that develops, manufactures, markets, supports and sells CAD-based quality assurance products integrated with CAD-based inspection and statistical process control software and 3D documentation systems. Our reporting segment sells into a variety of end markets, including automotive, aerospace, metal and machine fabrication, architecture, engineering, construction and public safety. Accordingly, there are no reporting segment goodwill balances at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2017 | | Beginning
Balance | | Additions | | Foreign
Currency
Translation | | Ending
Balance |
| Factory Metrology | | $ | 37,861 |
| | $ | 2,357 |
| | $ | 2,941 |
| | $ | 43,159 |
|
| Construction BIM-CIM | | 6,078 |
| | — |
| | 443 |
| | 6,521 |
|
| Public Safety Forensics | | $ | 2,805 |
| | $ | 55 |
| | $ | 210 |
| | $ | 3,070 |
|
| Total | | $ | 46,744 |
| | $ | 2,412 |
| | $ | 3,594 |
| | $ | 52,750 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2016 | | Beginning
Balance | | Additions | | Foreign
Currency
Translation | | Ending
Balance |
| Factory Metrology | | $ | 21,360 |
| | $ | 16,709 |
| | $ | (208 | ) | | $ | 37,861 |
|
| Construction BIM-CIM | | 3,429 |
| | 2,682 |
| | (33 | ) | | 6,078 |
|
| Public Safety Forensics | | $ | 1,582 |
| | $ | 1,238 |
| | $ | (15 | ) | | $ | 2,805 |
|
| Total | | $ | 26,371 |
| | $ | 20,629 |
| | $ | (256 | ) | | $ | 46,744 |
|
7.8. INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible assets consist of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | As of December 31, 2019 | | | | |
| | | Carrying Value | | Accumulated
Amortization | | Net Intangible |
| Amortizable intangible assets: | | | | | | |
| Product technology | | $ | 24,135 | | | $ | 19,798 | | | $ | 4,337 | |
| Patents and trademarks | | 13,726 | | | 6,894 | | | 6,832 | |
| Customer relationships | | 5,150 | | | 2,509 | | | 2,641 | |
| Other | | 8,875 | | | 8,214 | | | 661 | |
| Total | | $ | 51,886 | | | $ | 37,415 | | | $ | 14,471 | |
| | | | | As of December 31, 2017 | | | As of December 31, 2018 | |
| | | Carrying Value | | Accumulated
Amortization | | Net Intangible | | | Carrying Value | | Accumulated
Amortization | | Net Intangible |
| Amortizable intangible assets: | | | | | | | Amortizable intangible assets: | | | | | | |
| Product technology | | $ | 19,459 |
| | $ | 10,885 |
| | $ | 8,574 |
| Product technology | | $ | 26,588 | | | $ | 12,332 | | | $ | 14,256 | |
| Patents and trademarks | | 13,948 |
| | 5,720 |
| | 8,228 |
| Patents and trademarks | | 14,647 | | | 6,601 | | | 8,046 | |
| Customer relationships | | 5,889 |
| | 1,685 |
| | 4,204 |
| Customer relationships | | 12,027 | | | 2,588 | | | 9,439 | |
| Other | | 7,443 |
| | 5,909 |
| | 1,534 |
| Other | | 8,693 | | | 7,380 | | | 1,313 | |
| Total | | $ | 46,739 |
| | $ | 24,199 |
| | $ | 22,540 |
| Total | | $ | 61,955 | | | $ | 28,901 | | | $ | 33,054 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | As of December 31, 2016 |
| | | Carrying Value | | Accumulated
Amortization | | Net Intangible |
| Amortizable intangible assets: | | | | | | |
| Product technology | | $ | 15,700 |
| | $ | 7,614 |
| | $ | 8,086 |
|
| Patents and trademarks | | 13,328 |
| | 4,927 |
| | 8,401 |
|
| Customer relationships | | 5,466 |
| | 837 |
| | 4,629 |
|
| Other | | 8,013 |
| | 6,850 |
| | 1,163 |
|
| Total | | $ | 42,507 |
| | $ | 20,228 |
| | $ | 22,279 |
|
Amortization expense was $5.6 million, $5.4 million and $4.5 million $2.9 millionin 2019, 2018 and $2.0 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The estimated amortization expense for each of the years 20182020 through 20222024 and thereafter is as follows:
| | | | | |
| |
| Years ending December 31, | Amount |
| 2020 | $ | 3,287 | |
| 2021 | 3,128 | |
| 2022 | 2,642 | |
| 2023 | 2,214 | |
| 2024 | 1,649 | |
| Thereafter | 1,551 | |
| $ | 14,471 | |
| |
|
| | | |
| | |
| Years ending December 31, | Amount |
| 2018 | $ | 4,022 |
|
| 2019 | 3,770 |
|
| 2020 | 3,311 |
|
| 2021 | 2,880 |
|
| 2022 | 2,015 |
|
| Thereafter | 6,542 |
|
| | |
| | $ | 22,540 |
|
| | |
8.9. ACCRUED LIABILITIES
Accrued liabilities consist of the following:
| | | | | As of December 31, | | | As of December 31, | |
| | | 2017 | | 2016 | | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Accrued compensation and benefits | | $ | 16,144 |
| | $ | 13,649 |
| Accrued compensation and benefits | | $ | 15,366 | | | $ | 17,745 | |
| Accrued warranties | | 2,628 |
| | 2,594 |
| Accrued warranties | | 2,090 | | | 2,571 | |
| Professional and legal fees | | 1,541 |
| | 1,775 |
| Professional and legal fees | | 1,793 | | | 2,154 | |
| Taxes other than income | | 3,787 |
| | 4,026 |
| Taxes other than income | | 4,077 | | | 3,550 | |
| General services administration contract contingent liability (see Note 13) | | General services administration contract contingent liability (see Note 13) | | 11,886 | | | 5,267 | |
| Other accrued liabilities | | 3,262 |
| | 2,528 |
| Other accrued liabilities | | 2,860 | | | 5,040 | |
| | | $ | 27,362 |
| | $ | 24,572 |
| | $ | 38,072 | | | $ | 36,327 | |
Activity related to accrued warranties was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Years ended December 31, | | | | |
| | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Balance, beginning of year | | $ | 2,571 | | | $ | 2,628 | | | $ | 2,594 | |
| Provision for warranty expense | | 3,600 | | | 4,096 | | | 4,045 | |
| Fulfillment of warranty obligations | | (4,081) | | | (4,153) | | | (4,011) | |
| Balance, end of year | | $ | 2,090 | | | $ | 2,571 | | | $ | 2,628 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Years ended December 31, |
| | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Balance, beginning of year | | $ | 2,594 |
| | $ | 2,309 |
| | $ | 2,719 |
|
| Provision for warranty expense | | 4,045 |
| | 3,544 |
| | 3,597 |
|
| Fulfillment of warranty obligations | | (4,011 | ) | | (3,259 | ) | | (4,007 | ) |
| Balance, end of year | | $ | 2,628 |
| | $ | 2,594 |
| | $ | 2,309 |
|
9.10. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The guidance on fair value measurements and disclosures defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and requires enhanced disclosures about assets and liabilities measured at fair value. Fair value is defined as the price at which an asset could be exchanged in a current transaction between knowledgeable, willing parties. A liability’s fair value is defined as the amount that would be paid to transfer the liability to a new obligor, not the amount that would be paid to settle the liability with the creditor. Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters or derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available, valuation models are used to determine fair value. These models employ valuation techniques that involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency for the instruments or market and the instruments’ complexity.
Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in our consolidated balance sheets are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. Hierarchical levels, defined by the guidance on fair value measurements, are directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuation of these assets and liabilities and are as follows:
Level 1 - Valuation is based upon quoted market priceprices for identical instruments traded in active markets.
Level 2 - Valuation is based on quoted market prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.
Level 3 - Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market. Valuation techniques include use of discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.
Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are categorized in the tables below based upon the lowest level of significant input to the valuations:valuations. Historically, we have presented short-term investments in the fair value table presented below. As our short-term investments in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are comprised of U.S. Treasury Bills, these investments are classified as held-to-maturity investments and are not recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in our consolidated balance sheets. As such, we have removed short-term investments from the table below.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, 2017 |
| | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 |
| Assets: | | | | | | |
| Short-term investments (1) | | $ | 10,997 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Total | | $ | 10,997 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Liabilities: | | | | | | |
| Contingent consideration (2) | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 412 |
|
| Total | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 412 |
|
| | | December 31, 2016 |
| | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 |
| Assets: | | | | | | |
| Short-term investments (1) | | $ | 42,942 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Total | | $ | 42,942 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Liabilities: | | | | | | |
| Contingent consideration (2) | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,100 |
|
| Total | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,100 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | Short-term investments in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are six-month U.S. Treasury Bills. The fair values of these assets are based on Level 1 inputs in the fair value hierarchy. |
| December 31, 2019 | | | | |
(2) | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 |
| Liabilities: | | | | | | |
Contingent consideration liability represents arrangements to pay the former owners of certain companies we acquired. For the year ended (1) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 733 | |
| Total | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 733 | |
| | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2017, we paid $0.5 million as part of these arrangements. For the year ended December 31, 2016, we paid $0.8 million as part of these arrangements. The remaining change in the fair value of the contingent2018 | | | | |
| | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 |
| Liabilities: | | | | | | |
Contingent consideration from December 31, 2016 to December 31, 2017 was related to a $1.3 million decrease due to the expiration of the contingent consideration period for one of our acquisitions and changes in foreign currency exchange rates.(1) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 5,531 | |
| Total | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 5,531 | |
10.(1)Contingent consideration liability represents arrangements to pay the former owners of certain companies we acquired based on the former owners attaining future product release milestones. We use a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of contingent consideration liabilities. These probability weightings are developed internally and assessed on a quarterly basis. For the year ended December 31, 2019, we paid $3.1 million as part of these arrangements. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we paid $0.9 million as part of these arrangements. The remaining change in the fair value of the contingent consideration from December 31, 2018 to December 31, 2019 was related to changes in our estimates regarding the probability that the former owners will attain certain product release milestones. The undiscounted maximum payment as of December 31, 2019 under the arrangements was $0.8 million, based on certain milestones.
11. OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME) EXPENSE,, NET
Other expense (income) expense,, net consists of the following:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Years ended December 31, |
| | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Foreign exchange transaction (gains) losses | | $ | (162 | ) | | $ | 1,356 |
| | $ | 377 |
|
| Other | | (28 | ) | | (534 | ) | | (6 | ) |
| Total other (income) expense, net | | $ | (190 | ) | | $ | 822 |
| | $ | 371 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Years ended December 31, | | | | |
| | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Foreign exchange transaction losses (gains) | | $ | 1,211 | | | $ | 1,386 | | | $ | (162) | |
| Present4D impairment | | 2,152 | | | — | | | — | |
| Contingent consideration fair value adjustment | | (1,562) | | | — | | | — | |
| Other | | 512 | | | (247) | | | (28) | |
| Total other expense (income), net | | $ | 2,313 | | | $ | 1,139 | | | $ | (190) | |
11.
12. INCOME TAXES
Income (loss)(Loss) income before income tax expense (benefit) consists of the following:
| | | | | Years ended December 31, | | | Years ended December 31, | |
| | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Domestic | | $ | 2,468 |
| | $ | (1,527 | ) | | $ | (144 | ) | Domestic | | $ | (40,963) | | | $ | (1,723) | | | $ | 2,468 | |
| Foreign | | 3,359 |
| | 14,153 |
| | 12,950 |
| Foreign | | (20,051) | | | 6,281 | | | 3,359 | |
| Income before income taxes | | $ | 5,827 |
| | $ | 12,626 |
| | $ | 12,806 |
| |
| (Loss) Income before income taxes | | (Loss) Income before income taxes | | $ | (61,014) | | | $ | 4,558 | | | $ | 5,827 | |
The components of the income tax expense (benefit) for income taxes are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Years ended December 31, | | | | |
| | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Current: | | | | | | |
| Federal | | $ | 3,215 | | | $ | (1,694) | | | $ | 18,951 | |
| State | | 400 | | | 120 | | | 507 | |
| Foreign | | 3,809 | | | 1,394 | | | 2,072 | |
| Current income tax expense (benefit) | | 7,424 | | | (180) | | | 21,530 | |
| Deferred: | | | | | | |
| Federal | | (7,630) | | | (486) | | | 1,038 | |
| State | | (1,667) | | | (153) | | | (580) | |
| Foreign | | 3,006 | | | 447 | | | (1,645) | |
| Deferred income tax benefit | | (6,291) | | | (192) | | | (1,187) | |
| Income tax expense (benefit) | | $ | 1,133 | | | $ | (372) | | | $ | 20,343 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Years ended December 31, |
| | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Current: | | | | | | |
| Federal | | $ | 18,951 |
| | $ | 409 |
| | $ | 199 |
|
| State | | 507 |
| | 40 |
| | 78 |
|
| Foreign | | 2,072 |
| | 3,482 |
| | 562 |
|
| Current income tax expense | | 21,530 |
| | 3,931 |
| | 839 |
|
| Deferred: | | | | | | |
| Federal | | 1,038 |
| | (2,357 | ) | | 88 |
|
| State | | (580 | ) | | (229 | ) | | 9 |
|
| Foreign | | (1,645 | ) | | 174 |
| | (943 | ) |
| Deferred income tax benefit | | (1,187 | ) | | (2,412 | ) | | (846 | ) |
| Income tax expense (benefit) | | $ | 20,343 |
| | $ | 1,519 |
| | $ | (7 | ) |
Reconciliations of the income tax expense at the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate compared to our actual income tax expense (benefit) are summarized below:
| | | | | | | | | | | Years ended December 31, | |
| | | Years ended December 31, | | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | |
| Tax expense at statutory rate of 34% | | $ | 1,981 |
| | $ | 4,427 |
| | $ | 4,354 |
| |
| Tax expense at statutory rate | | Tax expense at statutory rate | | $ | (12,812) | | | $ | 956 | | | $ | 1,981 | |
| State income taxes, net of federal benefit | | 81 |
| | (50 | ) | | 54 |
| State income taxes, net of federal benefit | | (1,564) | | | (13) | | | 81 | |
| Foreign tax rate difference | | (2,057 | ) | | (1,939 | ) | | (3,708 | ) | Foreign tax rate difference | | (1,954) | | | (1,003) | | | (2,057) | |
| Research and development credit | | (1,037 | ) | | (917 | ) | | (853 | ) | Research and development credit | | (753) | | | (919) | | | (1,037) | |
| Change in valuation allowance | | 678 |
| | 162 |
| | (28 | ) | Change in valuation allowance | | 8,485 | | | 464 | | | 678 | |
| Equity based compensation | | 33 |
| | (255 | ) | | 54 |
| Equity based compensation | | (25) | | | (390) | | | 33 | |
| Manufacturing credit | | (191 | ) | | (61 | ) | | 11 |
| Manufacturing credit | | — | | | — | | | (191) | |
| Permanent impact of non-deductible cost | | 766 |
| | 412 |
| | (14 | ) | Permanent impact of non-deductible cost | | 1,550 | | | 727 | | | 766 | |
| Provision to return adjustments | | 777 |
| | (61 | ) | | (59 | ) | |
| Impact of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 | | 19,355 |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
| Provision to return adjustments & deferred adjustments | | Provision to return adjustments & deferred adjustments | | 356 | | | (654) | | | 777 | |
| Impact of the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 | | Impact of the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 | | — | | | — | | | 17,340 | |
| Change in enacted tax rates | | Change in enacted tax rates | | 359 | | | 58 | | | 2,015 | |
| Global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”) | | Global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”) | | 1,795 | | | 402 | | | — | |
| Intangible & goodwill impairment | | Intangible & goodwill impairment | | 4,999 | | | — | | | — | |
| Other | | (43 | ) | | (199 | ) | | 182 |
| Other | | 697 | | | — | | | (43) | |
| Income tax expense (benefit) | | $ | 20,343 |
| | $ | 1,519 |
| | $ | (7 | ) | Income tax expense (benefit) | | $ | 1,133 | | | $ | (372) | | | $ | 20,343 | |
The components of our net deferred income tax assetassets and liabilities are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | As of December 31, | | |
| | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Net deferred income tax asset - Non-current | | | | |
| Warranty cost | | $ | 616 | | | $ | 533 | |
| Inventory reserve | | 4,820 | | | 1,559 | |
| Unearned service revenue | | 11,616 | | | 6,684 | |
| Employee stock options | | 4,157 | | | 4,222 | |
| Tax credits | | 1,207 | | | 485 | |
| Loss carryforwards | | 7,481 | | | 7,038 | |
| Depreciation | | 345 | | | — | |
| Other, net | | 1,760 | | | 641 | |
| Total deferred tax assets | | 32,002 | | | 21,162 | |
| Valuation allowance | | (10,419) | | | (1,924) | |
| Total deferred tax assets net of valuation allowance | | 21,583 | | | 19,238 | |
| Net deferred income tax liability - Non-current | | | | |
| Depreciation | | — | | | (2,996) | |
| Intangibles & goodwill | | (3,174) | | | (2,261) | |
| Total deferred tax liabilities | | (3,174) | | | (5,257) | |
| Net deferred tax assets | | $ | 18,409 | | | $ | 13,981 | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | As of December 31, |
| | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Net deferred income tax asset - Non-current | | | | |
| Warranty cost | | $ | 695 |
| | $ | 1,121 |
|
| Inventory reserve | | 419 |
| | 456 |
|
| Unearned service revenue | | 5,364 |
| | 7,088 |
|
| Employee stock options | | 4,366 |
| | 4,501 |
|
| Tax Credits | | 1,785 |
| | 2,035 |
|
| Loss carryforwards | | 8,782 |
| | 8,005 |
|
| Other, net | | 1,479 |
| | 1,213 |
|
| Total deferred tax assets | | 22,890 |
| | 24,419 |
|
| Valuation Allowance | | (1,631 | ) | | (876 | ) |
| Total deferred tax assets net of valuation allowance | | 21,259 |
| | 23,543 |
|
| Net deferred income tax liability - Non-current | | | | |
| Bad debt reserve | | (2 | ) | | (159 | ) |
| Depreciation | | (3,675 | ) | | (6,799 | ) |
| Goodwill | | (1,574 | ) | | (2,279 | ) |
| Intangible assets | | (1,097 | ) | | (1,409 | ) |
| Total deferred tax liabilities | | (6,348 | ) | | (10,646 | ) |
| Net deferred tax assets | | $ | 14,911 |
| | $ | 12,897 |
|
On December 22, 2017, the United States enacted the Tax Cuts Act, resulting in significant modifications to existing law. We follow the guidance in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 (“SAB 118”), which provides additional clarification regarding the application of ASC Topic 740 in situations where a company does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of the Tax Cuts Act for the reporting period in which the Tax Cuts Act was enacted. SAB 118 provides for a measurement period beginning in the reporting period that includes the Tax Cuts Act's December 2017 enactment date and ending when we have obtained, prepared, and analyzed the information needed in order to complete the accounting for such income tax effects, but in no circumstances will the measurement period extend beyond one year from the enactment date.
Under the Tax Cuts Act, changes include lowering the statutory corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, eliminating certain deductions, imposing a mandatory tax on accumulated earnings in foreign subsidiaries, introducing new tax regimes, and changing how foreign earnings are subject to United States taxation. The statutory corporate tax rate reduction is effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2018. Based on our best estimate, we have calculated the impact of the Tax Cuts Act in our current year-end provision in accordance with our understanding of the Tax Cuts Act and available guidance. As a result, we recorded an amount of $19.4 million as an additional income tax expense in the fourth quarter of 2017, the period in which the legislation was enacted. The portion of this provisional amount that related to the transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of foreign earnings was $17.4 million based on our best estimate and guidance available as of the date of this filing. Additional work is necessary to perform a more detailed analysis of historical foreign earnings. Upon gathering all necessary data, interpreting any additional guidance from tax authorities, and completing the analysis, our provisional amount will be adjusted in the measurement period allowable in accordance with SAB 118. Our provisional amount relating to the transition tax may materially differ upon completing the analysis compared to the amount accrued as of December 31, 2017. The portion of the amount that related to the remeasurement of certain deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the rates at which they are expected to reverse in the future was $2.0 million.
Our domestic entities had deferred income tax assets in the amount of $7.7$15.3 million and $7.8$7.2 million as of December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 2016,2018, respectively. At December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, our foreign subsidiaries had deferred tax assets primarily relating to net operating losses of $7.9$7.2 million and $6.4$6.5 million, respectively, somethe majority of which expire in the next 1 to 9 years and others which can be carried forward indefinitely. The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets as of December 31, 20172019 and 20162018 was $1.6$10.4 million and $0.9$1.9 million, respectively. The net change in the total valuation allowance for each of the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 2016was an $8.5 million, a $0.3 million and 2015 was a $0.7 million and a $0.1 million increase, and $1.0 million decrease, respectively.
The valuation allowance as of December 31, 20172019 and 20162018 was primarily related to foreign net operating loss carryforwards that, in the judgment of management, were not more likely than not to be realized. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets depends on the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences are deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities (including the impact of available carryback and carryforward periods), projected taxable income, and tax-planning strategies in making this assessment.
Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes. In the ordinary course of a global business, there are many transactions for which the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain. We review our tax contingencies on a regular basis and make appropriate accruals as necessary.
As of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, our unrecognized tax benefits totaled $1.9 million, $0.3 million and $0.3 million, respectively, which are included in Income taxes payable - less current portion in our consolidated balance sheet.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years ended December 31, | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Balance at January 1 | | $ | 324 | | | $ | 324 | | | $ | 324 | |
| Additions based on tax positions related to the current year | | 314 | | | — | | | — | |
| Additions for tax positions of prior years | | 1,675 | | | — | | | — | |
| Lapse of statute of limitations | | (389) | | | — | | | — | |
| Balance at December 31 | | $ | 1,924 | | | $ | 324 | | | $ | 324 | |
We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions. The table below summarizes the open tax years and ongoing tax examinations in major jurisdictions as of December 31, 2017:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Jurisdiction | | Open Years | | Examination
in Process |
| United States - Federal Income Tax | | 2014-20172016-2019 | | N/A2016 |
| United States - various states | | 2013-20172015-2019 | | 2014-2016N/A |
| Germany | | 2013-20172013-2019 | | N/A2013-2014 |
| Switzerland | | 20172017-2019 | | N/A |
| Singapore | | 2013-20172015-2019 | | N/A |
We recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate is not material.$1.9 million. We do not currently anticipate that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits will result in material changes to our financial position. We are subject to income taxes at the federal, state and foreign country level. Our tax returns are subject to examination at the U.S. federal level from 2014 forward and at the state level are subject to a three to four year statute of limitations, depending on the state.
12.13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Leases – We lease buildings and equipment under non-cancellable operating leases through 2026. Some of these leases include cost-escalation clauses. Such cost-escalation clauses are recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments required under non-cancelable operating leases with initial terms in excess of one year, in effect at December 31, 2017:
|
| | | |
| | |
| Years ending December 31, | Amount |
| 2018 | $ | 6,563 |
|
| 2019 | 4,925 |
|
| 2020 | 3,123 |
|
| 2021 | 1,251 |
|
| 2022 | 1,213 |
|
| Thereafter | 3,564 |
|
| Total future minimum lease payments | $ | 20,639 |
|
Rent expense for 2017, 2016, and 2015 was $7.5 million, $7.7 million and $6.9 million, respectively.
Purchase Commitments — We enter into purchase commitments for products and services in the ordinary course of business. These purchases generally cover production requirements for 60 to 120 days as well as materials necessary to service customer units through the product lifecycle and for warranty commitments. As of December 31, 2017,2019, we had approximately $53.3$52.6 million in purchase commitments that are expected to be delivered within the next 12 months. To ensure adequate component availability in preparation for new product introductions, as of December 31, 2017,2019, we also had $0.7$1.5 million in long-term commitments for purchases to be delivered after 12 months.
Legal Proceedings — We are not involved in any legal proceedings other than routine litigation arising in the normal course of business, none of which we believe will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
U.S. Government Contracting Matter — We have sold our products and related services to the U.S. Government (the “Government”) under General Services Administration (“GSA”) Federal Supply Schedule contracts (the “GSA Contracts”) since 2002 and are currently selling our products and related services to the Government under two such GSA Contracts. Each GSA Contract is subject to extensive legal and regulatory requirements and includes, among other provisions, a price reduction clause (the “Price Reduction Clause”), which generally requires us to reduce the prices billed to the Government under the GSA Contracts to correspond to the lowest prices billed to certain benchmark customers.
13.Late in the fourth quarter of 2018, during an internal review we preliminarily determined that certain of our pricing practices may have resulted in the Government being overcharged under the Price Reduction Clauses of the GSA Contracts (the “GSA Matter”). As a result, we performed remediation efforts, including but not limited to, the identification of additional controls and procedures to ensure future compliance with the pricing and other requirements of the GSA Contracts. We also retained outside legal counsel and forensic accountants to assist with these efforts and to conduct a comprehensive review of our pricing and other practices under the GSA Contracts (the “Review”). On February 14, 2019, we reported the GSA Matter to the GSA and its Office of Inspector General.
As a result of the GSA Matter, for the fourth quarter of 2018, we reduced our total sales by a $4.8 million estimated cumulative sales adjustment, representative of the last six years of estimated overcharges to the Government under the GSA Contracts. In addition, for the fourth quarter of 2018, we recorded $0.5 million of imputed interest related to the estimated cumulative sales adjustment, which increased Interest expense, net and resulted in an estimated total liability of $5.3 million for the GSA Matter. This estimate was based on our preliminary review as of February 20, 2019, the date of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.
On July 15, 2019, we submitted a report to the GSA and its Office of Inspector General setting forth the findings of the Review conducted by our outside legal counsel and forensic accountants. Based on the results of the Review, we reduced our total sales for second quarter 2019 by an incremental $5.8 million sales adjustment, reflecting an estimated aggregate overcharge of $10.6 million under the GSA Contracts for the period from July 2011 to March 2019. In addition, we recorded an incremental $0.8 million of imputed interest related to the estimated cumulative sales adjustment during 2019, which increased Interest expense, net and resulted in a $6.6 million total incremental increase in the estimated total liability for the GSA Matter. As of the date of the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have recorded an aggregate estimated total liability for the GSA Matter of $11.9 million. This estimate is based on the information we have as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is subject to change based on discussions with our outside legal counsel and the Government.
In January 2020, we received requests for additional information from the GSA and its Office of Inspector General, and we are working with the GSA in responding to such inquiries. We intend to cooperate fully with this and any other Government inquiries. The Government’s review of, or investigation into, this matter could result in civil and criminal penalties, administrative sanctions, and contract remedies being imposed on us, including but not limited to, termination of the GSA Contracts, repayments of amounts already received under the GSA Contracts, forfeiture of profits, damages, suspension of payments, fines, and suspension or debarment from doing business with the Government and possibly U.S. state and local governments. We may also be subject to litigation and recovery under the federal False Claims Act and possibly similar state laws, which could include claims for treble damages, penalties, fees and costs. As a result, we cannot reasonably predict the outcome of the Government’s review of, or investigation into, this matter at this time or the resulting future financial impact on us. Any of these outcomes could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, our sales, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition, and the trading price of our common stock. In addition, we have incurred, and will continue to incur, legal and related costs in connection with the Review and the Government’s response to this matter.
14. STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS
We have two2 compensation plans that provide for the granting of stock options and other share-based awards to key employees and non-employee members of the Board of Directors. The 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (“2009 Plan”), and the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (“2014 Plan”) provide for granting options, restricted stock, restricted stock units or stock appreciation rights to employees and non-employee directors.
We were authorized to grant awards for up to 1,781,546 shares of common stock under the 2009 Plan, as well as any shares underlying awards outstanding under our 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2004 Plan"“2004 Plan”) as of the effective date of the 2009 Plan that thereafter terminated or expired unexercised or were canceled, forfeited or lapsed for any reason. There were 390,35174,386 options outstanding at December 31, 20172019 under the 2009 Plan at exercise prices between $35.90$43.33 and $57.54. The options outstanding under the 2009 Plan have a 10-year term (7 years on grants beginning in 2010) and vest over a 3-year period.7-year term.
In May 2014, our shareholders approved the 2014 Plan authorizing us to grant awards for up to 1,974,543 shares of common stock, as well as any shares underlying awards outstanding under the 2004 Plan and 2009 Plan as of the effective date of the 2014 Plan that thereafter terminate or expire unexercised or are canceled, forfeited or lapse for any reason. In May 2018, our shareholders approved an amendment to the 2014 Plan, which increased the number of shares available for issuance under the 2014 Plan by 1,000,000 shares. A maximum of 2,974,543 shares are available for issuance under the 2014 Plan, as amended, plus the number of shares (not to exceed 891,960) underlying awards outstanding under the 2004 Plan and the 2009 Plan as of May 29, 2014 that thereafter terminate or expire unexercised or are canceled, forfeited or lapse for any reason. There were 766,912412,343 options outstanding at December 31, 20172019 under the 2014 Plan at exercise prices between $29.98$33.05 and $59.97.$61.30. The options outstanding under the 2014 Plan have a 7-year term and generally vest over a 3-year period. No awards were outstanding under the 2004 Plan as of December 31, 2017, and we will not make any further grants under the 2004 Plan or the 2009 Plan.
Upon election to the Board, each non-employee director receives an initial equity grant of shares of restricted common stock with a value equal to $100,000, calculated using the closing share price on the date of the non-employee director’s election to the Board. The initial restricted stock grant vests on the third anniversary of the grant date, subject to the non-employee director’s continued membership on the Board. Annually, the non-employee directors are granted restricted shares equal to 50% of their compensation on the first business day following the annual meeting of shareholders, calculated using the closing price of our common stock on that day. In addition, the independent Chairman of the Board is annually granted restricted shares with a value equal to $50,000, and the Lead Director, if one has been appointed, would be annually granted restricted shares with a value equal to $40,000 on the first business day following the annual meeting of shareholders, calculated using the closing price of our common stock on that day. The shares of restricted stock granted annually to our non-employee directors, our independent Chairman of the Board and, if applicable, our Lead Director vest on the day prior to the following year’s annual meeting date, subject to a non-employee director’s continued membership on the Board. We record compensation cost associated with our restricted stock grants on a straight-line basis over the vesting term. Our non-employee directors also may elect to have their annual cash retainers and annual equity retainers paid in the form of deferred stock units pursuant to the 2014 Plan and the 2018 Non-Employee Director Deferred Compensation Plan. Each deferred stock unit represents the right to receive one share of our common stock upon the non-employee director's separation of service from the Company. We record compensation cost associated with our deferred stock units over the period of service.
Annually, upon approval by our Compensation Committee, we grant stock-based awards, which historically have been in the form of stock options andand/or restricted stock units, to certain employees. We also grant stock-based awards, which historically have been in the form of stock options andand/or restricted stock units, to certain new employees throughout the year. Prior to 2016, these awards vested in three equal annual installments beginning one year after the grant date. The fair value of these stock-based awards is determined by using (a) the current market price of our common stock on the grant date in the case of restricted stock units without a market condition, (b) the Monte Carlo Simulation valuation model in the case of performance-based restricted stock units with a market condition, or (b)(c) the Black-Scholes option valuation model in the case of stock options.
In 2015, weOur annual grants in February 2019 and the stock-based awards granted to Michael D. Burger upon the commencement of his service as our President and Chief Executive Officer in June 2019 and to Allen Muhich upon the commencement of his service as our Chief Financial Officer in July 2019 consisted of performance-based restricted stock units and time-based restricted stock units. Our annual grants in March 2018 consisted of time-based stock options and time-based restricted stock units. The number of stock options and/or restricted stock units granted was based on the employee’s individual objectives, performance against operational metrics assigned to certain executives. Thesethe employee and overall contribution to the Company over the prior year.
For the stock-based awards granted in 2019, the time-based restricted stock units vest in three3 equal annual installments beginning one year after the grant datedate. The performance-based restricted stock unit awards vest at the end of the 3-year performance period if the applicable performance measures or strategic objectives aremeasure is achieved. The related stock-based compensation expense iswill be recognized over the requisite service period, taking into account the probability that we will satisfy the performance measures or strategic objectives. In addition to certain strategic objectives, themeasure. The performance-based stock options and restricted stock units granted in 2015 are2019 will be earned and will vest based on (1) our achievement of specified revenue and EPS targets, and (2)upon our total shareholder return ("TSR"(“TSR”) relative to the TSR attained by companies within our defined peer group.
benchmark group, the Russell 2000 Growth Index. Due to the TSR presence in certainthese performance-based grants,restricted stock units, the fair value of these awards iswas determined using the Monte Carlo Simulation valuation model. We expense these market condition awards over the three-year vesting period regardless of the value that the award recipients ultimately receive. In February 2017, our Compensation Committee determinedreceive
For the number of performance-based stock options and restricted stock units that were earned forstock-based awards granted in 2018, the 2016 performance period. Based on the performance and strategic objectives achieved in 2016, 8,590 stock options and 300 restricted stock units were earned and vested and 20,388 stock options and 604 restricted stock units were determined to be unearned, as the required metrics were not achieved.
We did not grant performance-based stock options and restricted stock units to our employees during 2017. Instead, our annual grant in March 2017 consisted of stock options and restricted stock units that are subject to only time-based vesting. The number of stock options and restricted stock units granted was based on the employee’s individual objectives, performance against operational metrics assigned to the employee, and overall contribution over the last year. The restricted stock unit awards vest in full on the three-yearthree-year anniversary of the grant date. The stock options vest in three equal annual installments beginning one year after the grant date. The fair value of these stock-based awards is determined by using (a) the current market price of our common stock on the grant date in the case of restricted stock units or (b) the Black-Scholes option valuation model in the case of stock options.
The Black-Scholes optionMonte Carlo Simulation valuation model incorporates assumptions as to stock price volatility, the expected life of options or awards, a risk-free interest rate and dividend yield. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of the performance-based restricted stock units that were granted during 2019 and valued using the Monte Carlo Simulation valuation model was $66.16. NaN performance-based restricted stock units were granted during 2018 and 2017. For performance-based restricted stock units granted during 2019 valued using the Monte Carlo Simulation valuation model, we used the following assumptions:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31 |
| | 2019 |
| Risk-free interest rate | | 1.8% - 2.48% |
| Expected dividend yield | | — | % |
| Expected volatility | | 45.0 | % |
| Weighted-average expected volatility | | 45.0 | % |
The Black-Scholes option valuation model incorporates assumptions as to stock price volatility, the expected life of options or awards, a risk-free interest rate and dividend yield. The weighted-average grant date fair value of the stock options that were granted during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2018 and 20152017 and valued using the Black-Scholes option valuation model was $14.51, $12.90$23.43 and $15.08$14.51 per option, respectively. There were 0 stock options granted in 2019. For stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2018 and 20152017 valued using the Black-Scholes option valuation model, we used the following assumptions:
| | | | | Years ended December 31, | | | Year ended December 31 | |
| | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Risk-free interest rate | | 1.88% - 2.02% |
| | 1.06% - 1.57% |
| | 0.80% - 1.21% |
| Risk-free interest rate | | 2.65 | % | | 1.88% - 2.02% |
| Expected dividend yield | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | Expected dividend yield | | — | % | | — | % |
| Expected option life | | 5 years |
| | 4 years |
| | 3 years |
| Expected option life | | 4 years | | 5 years |
| Expected volatility | | 45.2 | % | | 45.0% - 47.0% |
| | 42.3% - 48.5% |
| Expected volatility | | 45.0 | % | | 45.2 | % |
| Weighted-average expected volatility | | 45.2 | % | | 46.1 | % | | 43.5 | % | Weighted-average expected volatility | | 45.0 | % | | 45.2 | % |
Historical information was the primary basis for the selection of the expected dividend yield, expected volatility and the expected lives of the options. The risk-free interest rate was based on the yields of U.S. zero coupon issues and U.S. Treasury issues, with a term equal to the expected life of the option being valued.
There were no market condition awards granted during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 and, as such, the Monte Carlo Simulation valuation model was not used to determine the fair value of the stock options and restricted stock units granted during 2017. In 2015, we granted performance-based stock options and restricted stock units which included the presence of a market condition and were valued using the Monte Carlo Simulation model. This valuation model incorporates assumptions as to stock price volatility, the expected life of options or awards, a risk-free interest rate and dividend yield. The assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the performance-based stock options and restricted stock units granted during 2015 and valued under the Monte Carlo Simulation model were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | Years Ended December 31, |
| | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Risk-free interest rate | | — | % | | — | % | | 0.95% - 1.48% |
|
| Expected dividend yield | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % |
| Expected option life | | — |
| | — |
| | 4 years |
|
| Expected volatility | | — | % | | — | % | | 44.5 | % |
| Weighted-average expected volatility | | — | % | | — | % | | 44.5 | % |
A summary of stock option activity and weighted average exercise prices follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Options | | Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price | | Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
(Years) | | Aggregate Intrinsic
Value as of
December 31, 2017 |
| Outstanding at January 1, 2017 | | 1,090,160 |
| | $ | 48.02 |
| | | | |
| Granted | | 267,794 |
| | 34.75 |
| | | | |
| Forfeited | | (84,591 | ) | | 44.39 |
| | | | |
| Exercised | | (96,212 | ) | | 37.05 |
| | | | |
| Unearned performance-based options | | (20,388 | ) | | 59.97 |
| | | | |
| Outstanding at December 31, 2017 | | 1,156,763 |
| | $ | 45.93 |
| | 4.3 | | $ | 7,082 |
|
| Options exercisable at December 31, 2017 | | 914,941 |
| | $ | 42.20 |
| | 2.3 | | $ | 2,369 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Options | | Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price | | Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
(Years) | | Aggregate Intrinsic
Value as of
December 31, 2019 |
| Outstanding at January 1, 2019 | | 792,943 | | | $ | 47.59 | | | | | |
| Granted | | — | | | — | | | | | |
| Forfeited | | (80,782) | | | 54.82 | | | | | |
| Exercised | | (225,479) | | | 35.45 | | | | | |
| Outstanding at December 31, 2019 | | 486,682 | | | $ | 52.37 | | | 3.4 | | $ | 2,267 | |
| Options exercisable at December 31, 2019 | | 428,411 | | | $ | 52.86 | | | 2.1 | | $ | 1,836 | |
The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 2016, and 2015 was $1.2$3.4 million, $1.7$7.5 million and $1.7$1.2 million, respectively. The total fair value of stock options vested during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 2016was $5.1 million, $3.7 million and 2015 was $4.1 million, $3.8 million and $3.9 million, respectively.
The following table summarizes the restricted stock and restricted stock unit activity and weighted average grant-dateweighted-average grant date fair values for the year ended December 31, 2017:2019:
| | | | | | | | Shares | | Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value |
| | | Shares | | Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value | |
| Non-vested at January 1, 2017 | | 150,682 |
| | $ | 33.39 |
| |
| Non-vested at January 1, 2019 | | Non-vested at January 1, 2019 | | 311,000 | | | $ | 42.66 | |
| Granted | | 155,975 |
| | 35.79 |
| Granted | | 284,445 | | | 50.83 | |
| Forfeited | | (26,855 | ) | | 33.95 |
| Forfeited | | (33,291) | | | 48.43 | |
| Vested | | (21,706 | ) | | 34.55 |
| Vested | | (163,836) | | | 39.32 | |
| Unearned performance-based awards | | (604 | ) | | 52.83 |
| |
| Non-vested at December 31, 2017 | | 257,492 |
| | $ | 34.75 |
| |
| Non-vested at December 31, 2019 | | Non-vested at December 31, 2019 | | 398,318 | | | $ | 49.53 | |
We recorded total stock-based compensation expense associated with our stock incentive plans of $11.1 million, $7.6 million and $6.5 million $5.4 millionin 2019, 2018 and $4.3 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
As of December 31, 2017,2019, there was $9.4$11.7 million in total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested stock-based compensation arrangements. The expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted averageweighted-average period of 1.92.0 years.
The following table summarizes total stock-based compensation expense for each of the line items on our consolidated statement of operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years ended December 31, | | | | |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Cost of Sales | | | | | | | | |
| Product | $ | 628 | | | $ | 477 | | | $ | 342 | |
| Service | 373 | | | 351 | | | 430 | |
| Total cost of sales | $ | 1,001 | | | $ | 828 | | | $ | 772 | |
| Operating Expenses | | | | | |
| Selling, general and administrative | $ | 8,786 | | | $ | 5,210 | | | $ | 4,412 | |
| Research and development | 1,282 | | | 1,583 | | | 1,272 | |
| Total operating expenses | $ | 10,068 | | | $ | 6,793 | | | $ | 5,684 | |
14.
15. (LOSS) EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic (loss) earnings per share is computed by dividing net (loss) income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed by also considering the impact of potential common stock on both net income and the weighted average number of shares outstanding. Our potential common stock consists of employee stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance-based awards. Our potential common stock is excluded from the basic (loss) earnings per share calculation and is included in the diluted earnings per share calculation when doing so would not be anti-dilutive. Performance-based awards are included in the computation of diluted earnings per share only to the extent that the underlying performance conditions (and any applicable market condition) (i) are satisfied as of the end of the reporting period or (ii) would be considered satisfied if the end of the reporting period were the end of the related contingency period and the result would be dilutive under the treasury stock method. When we report a net loss for the period presented, the diluted loss per share calculation does not include our potential common stock, as the inclusion of these shares in the calculation would have an anti-dilutive effect. A reconciliation of the number of common shares used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) earnings per share is presented below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Years Ended December 31, | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2019 | | | | 2018 | | | | 2017 | | |
| | | Shares | | Per-Share
Amount | | Shares | | Per-Share
Amount | | Shares | | Per-Share
Amount |
| Basic (loss) earnings per share | | 17,383,415 | | | $ | (3.58) | | | 17,043,167 | | | $ | 0.29 | | | 16,711,534 | | | $ | (0.87) | |
| Effect of dilutive securities | | — | | | — | | | 305,289 | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Diluted (loss) earnings per share | | 17,383,415 | | — | | $ | (3.58) | | | 17,348,456 | | | $ | 0.29 | | | 16,711,534 | | | $ | (0.87) | |
| Securities excluded from the determination of weighted average shares for the calculation of diluted (loss) earnings per share, as they were potentially antidilutive | | 886,274 | | | | | 393,970 | | | | | 1,049,563 | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Years Ended December 31, |
| | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | | Shares | | Per-Share
Amount | | Shares | | Per-Share
Amount | | Shares | | Per-Share
Amount |
| Basic (loss) earnings per share | | 16,711,534 |
| | $ | (0.87 | ) | | 16,654,786 |
| | $ | 0.67 |
| | 17,288,665 |
| | $ | 0.74 |
|
| Effect of dilutive securities | | — |
| | — |
| | 26,924 |
| | — |
| | 100,808 |
| | — |
|
| Diluted (loss) earnings per share | | 16,711,534 |
| — |
| $ | (0.87 | ) | | 16,681,710 |
| | $ | 0.67 |
| | 17,389,473 |
| | $ | 0.74 |
|
| Securities excluded from the determination of weighted average shares for the calculation of diluted (loss) earnings per share, as they were potentially antidilutive | | 1,049,563 |
| | | | 1,046,947 |
| | | | 870,421 |
| | |
15.16. EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN
We maintain a 401(k) defined contribution retirement plan for our eligible U.S. employees. Costs charged to operations in connection with the 401(k) plan during 2019, 2018 and 2017 2016,aggregated to $2.2 million, $2.1 million, and 2015 aggregated $1.7 million, $1.4respectively.
17. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITY
A variable interest entity (“VIE”) is an entity that has one of three characteristics: (1) it is controlled by someone other than its shareowners or partners, (2) its shareowners or partners are not economically exposed to the entity's earnings (for example, they are protected against losses), or (3) it lacks sufficient equity to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties.
On April 27, 2018, we invested $1.8 million in present4D GmbH (“present4D”), a software solutions provider for professional virtual reality presentations and $1.3training environments, in the form of an equity capital contribution. This contribution represented a minority investment in present4D. This investment's business purpose is to coordinate the design and development of modules supporting compatibility with virtual reality for our existing software offerings.
As of our investment date, present4D was thinly capitalized and lacked the sufficient equity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support and is classified as a VIE. We do not have power over decisions that significantly affect present4D’s economic performance and do not represent its primary beneficiary. After April 27, 2020, present4D may request additional equity financing of up to $1.8 million respectively.from us in exchange for additional share capital, which additional equity financing would be at our discretion. In July 2019, we originated a $0.5 million note with present4D, which we may convert into additional equity in present4D at our discretion in the event of a default. Further, the note is collateralized by the perpetual and royalty-free, non-exclusive, transferable and sublicensable license granted to us to use present4D’s software.
16. SEGMENT REPORTING
We have three reportable segments: Factory Metrology, Construction BIM-CIM, and Other. These segments are based upon the vertical markets that we currently serve. Business activities that do not meetintend to provide future support to present4D or to obtain the criteria to be reportable segments are aggregatedaforementioned additional share capital in the future. We do not intend to use the perpetual and royalty-free, non-exclusive, transferable and sublicensable license granted to us to use present4D’s software. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we wrote off our investment in, and our note receivable with, present4D and recognized a total loss of $2.2 million. Our portion of present4D’s net loss for the year ended
December 31, 2019 was approximately $0.2 million. We had no remaining asset related to present4D at December 31, 2019. Our investment in this unconsolidated VIE was $1.7 million as of December 31, 2018 and was included in Other category.long-term assets in our consolidated balance sheet as of such date. We have 0 remaining exposure to loss for our involvement with present4D.
18. GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Since the fourth quarter of 2016, we had operated in five verticals—3D Manufacturing, Construction Building Information Modeling (“Construction BIM”), Public Safety Forensics, 3D Design and Photonics—and had three reporting segments—3D Manufacturing, Construction BIM and Emerging Verticals. As discussed in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the third quarter of 2019, our new management team, led by our new Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), formulated and began to implement a new comprehensive strategic plan for our business. As part of our strategic planning process, we identified areas of our business that needed enhanced focus or change in order to improve our efficiency and cost structure. In the fourth quarter of 2019, we reassessed and redefined our go-to-market strategy, refocused our marketing engagement with our customers and re-evaluated our hardware product portfolio.
As part of our new strategic plan, and based on the recommendation of our CEO, who is also our Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”), in the fourth quarter of 2019, we eliminated our vertical structure and began reorganizing the Company into a functional structure. Our executive leadership team is now comprised of functional leaders in areas such as sales, marketing, operations, research and development and general and administrative, and resources are allocated to each function at a consolidated unit level. We develop, manufacture, market, supportno longer have separate business units, or segment managers or vertical leaders who report to the CODM with respect to operations, operating results or planning for levels or components below the total Company level. Instead, our CODM now allocates resources and sellevaluates performance on a Company-wide basis. Based on these changes, commencing with the fourth quarter of 2019, we are now reporting as one reporting segment that develops, manufactures, markets, supports and sells CAD-based quality assurance products integrated with CAD-based inspection and statistical process control software and three-dimensional3D documentation systems in eachsystems. Our reporting segment sells into a variety of these reportable segments.end markets, including automotive, aerospace, metal and machine fabrication, architecture, engineering, construction and public safety. These activities represent more than 99% of consolidated sales.
Our Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM), our Chief Executive Officer, evaluates segment performance and allocates resources based upon profitable growth. We use segment profit to evaluate the performance of our reportable segments. Segment profit is calculated as gross profit, net of selling and marketing expenses, for the reporting segment. Our definition of segment profit may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.
The following tables present information about our reportable segments for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Factory
Metrology | | Construction
BIM-CIM | | Other | | Total |
| 2017 | | | | | | | | |
| Net sales to external customers | | $ | 245,114 |
| | $ | 86,349 |
| | $ | 29,454 |
| | $ | 360,917 |
|
| Segment profit | | $ | 78,857 |
| | $ | 21,077 |
| | $ | 1,159 |
| | $ | 101,093 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| General and administrative | | | | | | | | 43,807 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | | | | | | | | 16,588 |
|
| Research and development | | | | | | | | 35,376 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Income from operations | | | | | | | | $ | 5,322 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Factory
Metrology | | Construction
BIM-CIM | | Other | | Total |
| 2016 | | | | | | | | |
| Net sales to external customers | | $ | 236,313 |
| | $ | 65,056 |
| | $ | 24,215 |
| | $ | 325,584 |
|
| Segment profit | | $ | 73,656 |
| | $ | 14,799 |
| | $ | 9,635 |
| | $ | 98,090 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| General and administrative | | | | | | | | 40,813 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | | | | | | | | 13,868 |
|
| Research and development | | | | | | | | 30,125 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Income from operations | | | | | | | | $ | 13,284 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Factory
Metrology | | Construction
BIM-CIM | | Other | | Total |
| 2015 | | | | | | | | |
| Net sales to external customers | | $ | 222,745 |
| | $ | 70,849 |
| | $ | 23,954 |
| | $ | 317,548 |
|
| Segment profit | | $ | 63,463 |
| | $ | 16,299 |
| | $ | 7,637 |
| | $ | 87,399 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| General and administrative | | | | | | | | 36,370 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | | | | | | | | 11,217 |
|
| Research and development | | | | | | | | 26,690 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Income from operations | | | | | | | | $ | 13,122 |
|
NetTotal sales to external customers is based upon the geographic location of the customer.
| | | | | | | | | | | For the Years Ended December 31, | |
| | | For the Years Ended December 31, | | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | |
| Net sales to external customers | | | | | | | |
| Total sales to external customers | | Total sales to external customers | | | | | | |
| United States | | $ | 141,595 |
| | $ | 133,924 |
| | $ | 131,670 |
| United States | | $ | 151,646 | | | $ | 156,242 | | | $ | 141,595 | |
| Americas-Other | | 13,531 |
| | 11,815 |
| | 11,718 |
| Americas-Other | | 14,110 | | | 15,086 | | | 13,531 | |
| Germany | | 49,860 |
| | 44,041 |
| | 41,151 |
| Germany | | 52,083 | | | 53,251 | | | 49,860 | |
| Europe-Other | | 65,201 |
| | 57,710 |
| | 62,032 |
| Europe-Other | | 70,196 | | | 74,010 | | | 65,201 | |
| Japan | | 35,270 |
| | 32,530 |
| | 24,018 |
| Japan | | 33,361 | | | 37,607 | | | 35,270 | |
| China | | China | | 32,934 | | | 36,130 | | | 30,405 | |
| Asia-Other | | 55,460 |
| | 45,564 |
| | 46,959 |
| Asia-Other | | 27,435 | | | 31,301 | | | 25,055 | |
| | | $ | 360,917 |
| | $ | 325,584 |
| | $ | 317,548 |
| | $ | 381,765 | | | $ | 403,627 | | | $ | 360,917 | |
Long-lived assets consist primarily of property, plant, and equipment, goodwill, and intangible assets, and are attributed to the geographic area in which they are located or originated, as applicable.
| | | | | As of December 31, | | | As of December 31, | |
| | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Long-Lived Assets | | | | | | | Long-Lived Assets | | | | | | |
| United States | | $ | 54,703 |
| | $ | 54,157 |
| | $ | 39,973 |
| United States | | $ | 45,225 | | | $ | 61,557 | | | $ | 54,703 | |
| Americas-Other | | 13,834 |
| | 13,486 |
| | 9,447 |
| Americas-Other | | 10,889 | | | 10,702 | | | 13,834 | |
| Germany | | 26,611 |
| | 23,734 |
| | 24,637 |
| Germany | | 26,295 | | | 30,154 | | | 26,611 | |
| Europe-Other | | 9,124 |
| | 6,949 |
| | 1,146 |
| Europe-Other | | 4,984 | | | 24,935 | | | 9,124 | |
| Japan | | 558 |
| | 460 |
| | 517 |
| Japan | | 1,423 | | | 1,039 | | | 558 | |
| Asia-Other | | 2,246 |
| | 1,915 |
| | 2,582 |
| Asia-Other | | 2,313 | | | 2,358 | | | 2,246 | |
| | | $ | 107,076 |
| | $ | 100,701 |
| | $ | 78,302 |
| | $ | 91,129 | | | $ | 130,745 | | | $ | 107,076 | |
17.
19. LEASES
We have operating and finance leases for manufacturing facilities, corporate offices, research and development facilities, sales and training facilities, vehicles, and certain equipment under which we assume the role of lessee. We do not lease assets as a lessor. Our leases have remaining lease terms of less than one year to approximately seven years, some of which include options to extend the leases for up to eight years, and some of which include options to terminate the leases within three months. We currently do not sublease any of our leased assets.
We determine if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Operating leases are included in Operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) asset, Lease liability, and Lease liability - less current portion in our consolidated balance sheets. Finance leases are included in Property and equipment, net, Lease liability, and Lease liability - less current portion in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.
ROU assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term, and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease ROU assets and lease liabilities are recognized on the commencement date of the lease based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. Variable lease payments that depend on an index or rate include the variable portion when calculating ROU assets and lease liabilities. Variable lease payments that do not depend on an index or rate are expensed as incurred. As most of our leases do not provide an implicit rate, we use our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available on the commencement date of the lease to determine the present value of lease payments. We use the implicit rate when readily determinable. The operating lease ROU assets also include any lease payments made and lease incentives. Our lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise that option at the time the lease is commenced. Lease expense for lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
While we have lease agreements with lease and non-lease components, we account for the lease and non-lease components as a single lease component.
The components of lease expense were as follows:
| | | | | |
| Year Ended
December 31, 2019 |
| Operating lease cost | $ | 8,114 | |
| |
| Finance lease cost: | |
| Amortization of ROU assets | $ | 363 | |
| Interest on lease liabilities | $ | 45 | |
| Total finance lease cost | $ | 408 | |
We recognize lease payments made for short-term leases where terms are 12 months or less as the payments are incurred. Our short-term lease cost for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $0.2 million.
Supplemental balance sheet information related to leases was as follows:
| | | | | |
| As of |
| December 31, 2019 |
| Operating leases: | |
| Operating lease right-of-use asset | $ | 18,418 | |
| |
| Current operating lease liability | $ | 6,349 | |
| Operating lease liability - less current portion | 13,272 | |
| Total operating lease liability | $ | 19,621 | |
| |
| Finance leases: | |
| Property and equipment, at cost | $ | 1,870 | |
| Accumulated depreciation | (1,150) | |
| Property and equipment, net | $ | 720 | |
| | |
| Current finance lease liability | $ | 325 | |
| Finance lease liability - less current portion | 426 | |
| Total finance lease liability | $ | 751 | |
| |
| Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term (in years): | |
| Operating leases | 4.48 |
| Finance leases | 2.48 |
| |
| Weighted Average Discount Rate: | |
| Operating leases | 5.10 | % |
| Finance leases | 5.09 | % |
Supplemental cash flow information related to leases was as follows:
| | | | | |
| Year Ended
December 31, 2019 |
| Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities: | |
| Operating cash flows from operating leases | $ | 8,037 | |
| Operating cash flows from finance leases | $ | 45 | |
| Financing cash flows from finance leases | $ | 358 | |
| |
| ROU assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations: | |
| Operating leases | $ | 8,970 | |
| Finance leases | $ | — | |
Maturities of lease liabilities are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ending December 31, | Operating leases | | Finance leases |
| 2020 | $ | 7,188 | | | $ | 355 | |
| 2021 | | 3,955 | | | 315 | |
| 2022 | | 3,110 | | | 86 | |
| 2023 | | 2,841 | | | 37 | |
| 2024 | | 2,709 | | | 6 | |
| Thereafter | 2,371 | | | — | |
| Total lease payments | $ | 22,174 | | | $ | 799 | |
| Less imputed interest | (2,553) | | | (48) | |
| Total | $ | 19,621 | | | $ | 751 | |
20. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
In April 2017, we completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Instrument Associates, LLC d/b/a Nutfield, Technology (“Nutfield”), a component technology business located in Hudson, New Hampshire, which specializes in the design and manufacture of advanced galvanometer-based optical scanners, scan heads and laser kits, for a total purchase price of approximately $5.5 million. This acquisition supports our long-term strategyDuring the fourth quarter of 2019, we impaired the goodwill and intangible assets related to expand our presence in key marketsthis acquisition. See Note 7, “Goodwill” and improve our existing product lines with innovative technology.Note 8, “Intangible Assets” for further information. The results of the acquired business’ operations as of and after the date of acquisition have been included in our consolidated financial statements as of and for the yearyears ended December 31, 2019, December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.
In December 2016,On March 9, 2018, we acquired MWF-technology, GmbH (“MWF”)all of the outstanding shares of Laser Control Systems, a laser component technology business located in Bedfordshire, United Kingdom, which specializes in the design and manufacture of advanced digital scan heads and laser software, for a purchase price net of cash acquired,$1.7 million. We paid an additional $0.6 million in contingent consideration earned by the former owners for meeting certain milestones. During the fourth quarter of approximately $6.6 million, paid with cash on hand. MWF, an innovator2019, we impaired the goodwill and intangible assets related to this acquisition. See Note 7, “Goodwill” and Note 8, “Intangible Assets” for further information. The results of Laser Control Systems’ operations as of and after the date of acquisition have been included in mobile augmented reality solutions located near Frankfurt, Germany, provides technology that enables large, complex 3D CAD data to be transferred to a tablet deviceour consolidated financial statements as of and for use in mobile visualizationthe years ended December 31, 2019 and comparison to real world conditions. This enables real time, actionable manufacturing insight for in-process inspection, assembly, guidance and positioning.December 31, 2018.
In August 2016,On March 16, 2018, we acquired Laser Projection Technologies, Inc. (“LPT”)all of the outstanding shares of Photocore AG, a vision-based 3D measurement application and software developer in Zurich, Switzerland, for a total purchase price net of cash acquired, of approximately $17.2 million, paid with cash on hand. LPT, located in Londonderry, New Hampshire, specializes in laser projection and measurement systems used throughout manufacturing environments around the globe to maximize productivity and efficiency. The$2.4 million. This acquisition enhances our portfolio of 3D measurement solutions and supports our long-term strategy to expandimprove our presenceexisting software offerings with innovative technology in key markets.photogrammetry. The results of Photocore AG’s operations as of and after the date of acquisition have been included in our consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.
InOn July 2016,6, 2018, we acquired BuildIT Software & Solutions Ltd. (“BuildIT”)all of the outstanding shares of Lanmark, a high-speed laser marking control boards and laser marking software provider located in Acton, Massachusetts, for a purchase price net of cash$6.3 million. We paid an additional $0.3 million in contingent consideration earned by the former owners for meeting certain milestones. During the fourth quarter of 2019, we impaired the goodwill and intangible assets related to this acquisition. See Note 7, “Goodwill” and Note 8, “Intangible Assets” for further information. The results of Lanmark’s operations as of and after the date of acquisition have been included in our consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.
On July 13, 2018, we acquired all of approximately $3.9 million, paid with cash on hand. BuildIT,the issued and outstanding corporate capital of Open Technologies, a software solutions business3D structured light scanning solution company located in Montreal, Canada, specializesBrescia, Italy, for an aggregate purchase price of up to €18.5 million ($21.6 million), subject to post-closing adjustments based on actual net working capital, net financial position and transaction expenses. We paid an additional $2.2 million in process-configurable 3D metrology software solutions with hardware agnostic interfaces.contingent consideration earned by the former owners for meeting certain product development milestones. An additional €2.0 million ($2.2 million) in contingent consideration may be earned by the former owners if certain product development milestones are met in the future. The additionU.S. Dollar amounts have been converted from Euros based on the foreign exchange rate in effect on the closing date of BuildIT enhancesthe acquisition. During the fourth quarter of 2019, we impaired the goodwill and intangible assets related to this acquisition. See Note 7, “Goodwill” and Note 8, “Intangible Assets” for further information. The results of Open Technologies’ operations as of and after the date of acquisition have been included in our metrology portfolio, providing customers greater software options to use in a varietyconsolidated financial statements as of applications to reduce inspection and assembly timesfor the years ended December 31, 2019 and increase productivity.December 31, 2018.
The acquisitions of Nutfield, MWF, LPT,Laser Control Systems, Photocore AG, Lanmark and BuildITOpen Technologies constitute business combinations as defined by FASB ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations. Accordingly, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their fair values on the date of acquisition.
The purchase price allocations below represent our final determination of the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed for such acquisitions. In the year ended December 31, 2019, certain refinements were booked for the Open Technologies acquisition as part of the finalization process, which included a reduction of $2.6 million to the valuation of the customer relationship intangible and the recognition of a deferred tax liability of $1.9 million. Goodwill increased $4.4 million as result of these changes in the finalization process.
Following is a summary of our allocations of the purchase price to the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the date of each acquisition:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nutfield | | Laser Controls Systems | | Photocore AG | | Lanmark | | Open Technologies (3) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Accounts receivable | | $ | 160 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 610 | | | $ | 2,735 | |
| Inventory | | 539 | | | — | | | — | | | 299 | | | 1,852 | |
| Other assets | | 96 | | | — | | | — | | | 76 | | | 634 | |
| Deferred income tax assets | | 131 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Intangible assets | | 2,329 | | | 1,400 | | | 1,435 | | | 1,366 | | | 7,821 | |
Goodwill (1) | | 2,357 | | | 928 | | | 1,010 | | | 5,355 | | | 13,573 | |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | (12) | | | — | | | — | | | (159) | | | (2,926) | |
Other liabilities (2) | | (104) | | | (579) | | | — | | | (971) | | | (5,201) | |
| Deferred income tax liabilities | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (325) | | | (1,876) | |
| Total purchase price, net of cash acquired | | $ | 5,496 | | | $ | 1,749 | | | $ | 2,445 | | | $ | 6,251 | | | $ | 16,612 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | BuildIt | | LPT | | MWF | | Nutfield |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Accounts receivable | | $ | 237 |
| | $ | 54 |
| | $ | 150 |
| | $ | 160 |
|
| Inventory | | — |
| | 322 |
| | — |
| | 539 |
|
| Other assets | | 36 |
| | 160 |
| | 666 |
| | 96 |
|
| Deferred income tax assets | | — |
| | 1,112 |
| | — |
| | 131 |
|
| Intangible assets | | 1,015 |
| | 5,474 |
| | 1,816 |
| | 2,329 |
|
| Goodwill (1) | | 3,393 |
| | 11,922 |
| | 5,364 |
| | 2,357 |
|
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | (95 | ) | | (747 | ) | | (700 | ) | | (12 | ) |
| Other liabilities | | (471 | ) | | (1,086 | ) | | (345 | ) | | (104 | ) |
| Deferred income tax liabilities | | (205 | ) | | — |
| | (364 | ) | | — |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total purchase price, net of cash acquired | | $ | 3,910 |
| | $ | 17,211 |
| | $ | 6,587 |
| | $ | 5,496 |
|
(1)The goodwill arising from the acquisitions consists largely of the expected synergies from combining operations as well as the value of the workforce. A portion of the goodwill is expected to be tax deductible for Nutfield.
| |
(1) | The goodwill arising from the acquisitions consists largely of the expected synergies from combining operations as well as the value of the workforce. A portion of the goodwill is expected to be tax deductible for both the LPT and Nutfield acquisitions. |
(2)For Laser Control Systems, Lanmark and Open Technologies, this total consists primarily of the fair value of the projected contingent consideration.
(3)Amounts converted from Euros to U.S. Dollars based on the foreign exchange rate on the closing date of the acquisition.
Following are the details of the purchase price allocated to the intangible assets acquired for the acquisitions noted above:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nutfield | | | | Laser Control Systems | | | | Photocore AG | | | Lanmark | | | Open Technologies | |
| | Amount | | Weighted Average Life (Years) | | | Amount | | Weighted Average Life (Years) | | | Amount | Weighted Average Life (Years) | | Amount | Weighted Average Life (Years) | | Amount | Weighted Average Life (Years) |
| Trade name | | $ | 29 | | 1 | | $ | — | | 0 | | $ | — | | 0 | | $ | — | | 0 | | $ | — | | 0 |
| Brand | | — | | 0 | | | 26 | | 1 | | 22 | | 1 | | 26 | | 1 | | 103 | | 1 |
| Non-competition agreement | | 144 | | 5 | | 29 | | 3 | | 9 | | 3 | | — | | 0 | | — | | 0 |
| Technology | | 1,970 | | 10 | | 1,319 | | 7 | | 1,343 | | 7 | | 760 | | 7 | | 4,441 | | 7 |
| Customer relationships | | 95 | | 10 | | 26 | | 10 | | 61 | | 10 | | 580 | | 10 | | 3,277 | | 10 |
| Favorable in-place lease | | 91 | | 12 | | — | | 0 | | — | | 0 | | — | | 0 | | — | | 0 |
Fair value of intangible
assets acquired | | $ | 2,329 | | 10 | | $ | 1,400 | | 7 | | $ | 1,435 | | 7 | | $ | 1,366 | | 8 | | $ | 7,821 | | 8 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | BuildIt | | LPT | | MWF | | Nutfield |
| | | Amount | Weighted Average Life | | Amount | Weighted Average Life | | Amount | Weighted Average Life | | Amount | Weighted Average Life |
| Trade name | | $ | 346 |
| 7 | | $ | 64 |
| 1 | | $ | 36 |
| 1 | | $ | 29 |
| 1 |
| Non-competition agreement | | 31 |
| 5 | | — |
| 0 | | 3 |
| 2 | | 144 |
| 5 |
| Technology | | 361 |
| 7 | | 4,260 |
| 7 | | 951 |
| 5 | | 1,970 |
| 10 |
| Customer relationships | | 277 |
| 7 | | 1,150 |
| 7 | | 826 |
| 5 | | 95 |
| 10 |
| Favorable in-place lease | | — |
| 0 | | — |
| 0 | | — |
| 0 | | 91 |
| 12 |
Fair value of intangible
assets acquired | | $ | 1,015 |
| 7 | | $ | 5,474 |
| 7 | | $ | 1,816 |
| 5 | | $ | 2,329 |
| 10 |
TheWe test goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances would indicate that it is more likely than not the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying value. We changed the timing of our annual test of goodwill during 2019 to align with our updated strategic plan and annual budgetary process. Accordingly, we performed our annual quantitative test for impairment of our recorded goodwill as of December 10, 2019. As a result of this test, the estimated fair value of each of the Photonics reporting unit, which included goodwill recognized with the Nutfield, Laser Control Systems and Lanmark acquisitions, and the 3D Design reporting unit, which included goodwill recognized with the Open Technologies acquisition, has been allocatedwere determined to be less than the Factory Metrologycarrying value of the reporting segment. The goodwill forunit, indicating a full impairment. This impairment was driven primarily by historical and projected financial performance lower than our expectations and changes in our go-forward strategy in connection with our new strategic plan.
Additionally, as a result of historical and projected financial performance lower than our expectations and changes in our go-forward strategy in connection with our new strategic plan, the BuildIT, LPT and MWF acquisitions was allocated to the appropriate operating segments using the relativeestimated fair value approachof acquired intangibles recognized with the Nutfield, Laser Control Systems, Lanmark and Open Technologies acquisitions were determined to be less than the carrying value of the net carrying value for such assets. We recognized an impairment charge related to such acquired intangibles of $10.5 million in 2016. the fourth quarter of 2019.
Acquisition and integration costs are not included as components of consideration transferred, but are recorded as expense in the period in which such costs are incurred. To date, we have incurred approximately $0.9$0.8 million in acquisition and integration costs for the BuildIT, LPT, MWFNutfield, Laser Control Systems, Photocore AG, Lanmark and NutfieldOpen Technologies acquisitions. Pro forma financial results for BuildIT, LPT, MWFNutfield, Laser Control Systems, Photocore AG, Lanmark, and NutfieldOpen Technologies have not been presented because the effects of these transactions, individually and in the aggregate, were not material to our consolidated results of operations.
21. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
18.
On February 14, 2020, our Board of Directors approved a global restructuring plan (the “Restructuring Plan”), which is intended to support our strategic plan in an effort to improve operating performance and ensure that we are appropriately structured and resourced to deliver sustainable value to our shareholders and customers. Key activities under the Restructuring Plan include a continued focus on efficiency and cost-saving efforts, which includes decreasing total headcount by approximately 500 employees upon the completion of the Restructuring Plan.
These activities are expected to be substantially completed by the end of 2021.We estimate that the Restructuring Plan will reduce gross annual pre-tax expenses by approximately $40 million, to be realized in the fourth quarter of 2020 on an annualized basis.We estimate that the implementation of the Restructuring Plan will result in pre-tax charges of approximately $26 million to $36 million, which are in addition to the pre-tax charges of approximately $49 million recorded in the fourth quarter of 2019 in connection with the implementation of our new strategic plan. We expect $18 million to $22 million of these additional charges to be in the form of cash charges. Actual results, including the costs of the Restructuring Plan, may differ materially from our expectations, resulting in our inability to realize the expected benefits of the Restructuring Plan and our new strategic plan and negatively impacting our ability to execute our future plans and strategies, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
22. QUARTERLY RESULT OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter ended | | March 31,
2019 | | June 30,
2019 | | September 30,
2019 | | December 31,
2019 |
Sales (1) | | $ | 93,617 | | | $ | 93,491 | | | $ | 90,516 | | | $ | 104,141 | |
Gross profit (2) | | 53,018 | | | 50,741 | | | 50,772 | | | 43,601 | |
Net income (loss) (3) | | 152 | | | (6,405) | | | (6,199) | | | (49,695) | |
| Net income (loss) per share: | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | | $ | 0.01 | | | $ | (0.37) | | | $ | (0.36) | | | $ | (2.85) | |
| Diluted | | $ | 0.01 | | | $ | (0.37) | | | $ | (0.36) | | | $ | (2.85) | |
(1)For the second quarter of 2019, sales were reduced by an incremental $5.8 million sales adjustment related to our GSA Contracts based on the results of the Review conducted by our outside legal counsel and forensic accountants.
(2)For the fourth quarter of 2019, gross profit was reduced by a $15.1 million inventory reserve charge primarily driven by the evaluation of our hardware product portfolio, which increased our reserve for excess and obsolete inventory.
(3)For the fourth quarter of 2019, we incurred an impairment loss of $35.2 million, which included $21.2 million in goodwill, $10.5 million in intangible assets associated with recent acquisitions, $1.4 million in intangible assets related to capitalized patents, and $2.1 million in other asset write-downs.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter ended | | March 31,
2018 | | June 30,
2018 | | September 30,
2018 | | December 31,
2018 |
Sales (1) | | $ | 92,834 | | | $ | 98,244 | | | $ | 99,705 | | | $ | 112,844 | |
Gross profit (2) | | 52,106 | | | 55,994 | | | 50,612 | | | 62,841 | |
Net income (loss) (3) | | 455 | | | 1,205 | | | (2,488) | | | 5,758 | |
| Net income (loss) per share: | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | | $ | 0.03 | | | $ | 0.07 | | | $ | (0.15) | | | $ | 0.33 | |
| Diluted | | $ | 0.03 | | | $ | 0.07 | | | $ | (0.15) | | | $ | 0.33 | |
(1)For the fourth quarter of 2018, sales were reduced by a $4.8 million estimated cumulative sales adjustment, representative of the last six years of estimated overcharges to the Government under the GSA Contracts.
(2)For the third quarter of 2018, gross profit was reduced by a $4.7 million inventory reserve charge resulting from an analysis of our inventory reserves in connection with our new product introductions and acquisitions, which increased our reserve for excess and obsolete inventory.
(3)For the fourth quarter of 2018, as additional guidance was released during the Securities and Exchange Commission's Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 remeasurement period related to the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, we completed our transition tax analysis, which resulted in an income tax benefit of $1.0 million.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter ended | | March 31,
2017 | | June 30,
2017 | | September 30,
2017 | | December 31,
2017 |
| Sales | | $ | 81,562 |
| | $ | 82,682 |
| | $ | 90,250 |
| | $ | 106,423 |
|
| Gross profit | | 43,749 |
| | 46,760 |
| | 52,034 |
| | 62,094 |
|
| Net (loss) income | | (1,461 | ) | | (3,625 | ) | | 1,628 |
| | (11,058 | ) |
| Net (loss) income per share: | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | | $ | (0.09 | ) | | $ | (0.22 | ) | | $ | 0.10 |
| | $ | (0.66 | ) |
| Diluted | | $ | (0.09 | ) | | $ | (0.22 | ) | | $ | 0.10 |
| | $ | (0.66 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter ended | | March 31,
2016 | | June 30,
2016 | | September 30,
2016 | | December 31,
2016 |
| Sales | | $ | 75,748 |
| | $ | 78,538 |
| | $ | 79,600 |
| | $ | 91,698 |
|
| Gross profit | | 42,671 |
| | 43,934 |
| | 42,678 |
| | 48,677 |
|
| Net income | | 3,080 |
| | 3,392 |
| | 1,090 |
| | 3,545 |
|
| Net income per share: | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | | $ | 0.19 |
| | $ | 0.20 |
| | $ | 0.07 |
| | $ | 0.21 |
|
| Diluted | | $ | 0.19 |
| | $ | 0.20 |
| | $ | 0.07 |
| | $ | 0.21 |
|
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2017.2019. Disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act)Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this Annual Report on Form 10-K, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures also include, without limitation, controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
The evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures included a review of the control objectives and design, our implementation of the controls and the effect of the controls on the information generated for use in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In conducting this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined by Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act, were effective as of December 31, 20172019 to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and was accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 20172019 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act). Internal control over financial reporting is the process designed under the Chief Executive Officer’s and the Chief Financial Officer’s supervision, and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.
There are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility that misstatements may not be prevented or detected. Accordingly, an effective control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the designed control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. The design of any system of controls is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2019, as required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(c). In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in the 2013 Internal Control - Integrated Framework. Based on our assessment under the framework in the 2013 Internal Control - Integrated Framework, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.2019.
Grant Thornton LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited our consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, has issued an attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2019, which appears below.
FARO Technologies, Inc.
Lake Mary, Florida
February 21, 201819, 2020
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
FARO Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Opinion on internal control over financial reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of FARO Technologies, Inc. (a Florida corporation) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017,2019 based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control— IntegratedControl-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2019 based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control— IntegratedControl-Integrated Framework issued by COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, and our report dated February 21, 201819, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Basis for opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and limitations of internal control over financial reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Orlando, Florida
February 21, 201819, 2020
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.GOVERNANCE
The information required by this Item with respect to directors and executive officers is incorporated herein by reference to the information under the headings “Election of Directors” and “Executive Officers” contained in our definitive proxy statement for our 20182020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which we refer to as the Proxy Statement.
The information required by this Item regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act appears under the heading “Section“Delinquent Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance”Reports” in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
The information required by this Item with respect to corporate governance and our Code of Ethics is incorporated herein by reference to the information contained in the Proxy Statement under the heading “Corporate Governance and Board Matters."”
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.COMPENSATION
The information required by this Item regarding executive compensation is incorporated herein by reference to the information contained in the Proxy Statement under the headings “Executive Compensation” and “2017“2019 Director Compensation.”
The information required by this Item regarding Compensation Committee interlocks and insider participation is incorporated herein by reference to the information contained in the Proxy Statement under the heading “Corporate Governance and Board Matters.”
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.MATTERS
The information required by this Item regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters is incorporated herein by reference to the information contained in the Proxy Statement under the headings “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information.”
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.INDEPENDENCE
The information required by this Item about certain relationships and related transactions appears under the heading “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
The information required by this Item regarding director independence is incorporated herein by reference to the information contained in the Proxy Statement under the heading “Corporate Governance and Board Matters.”
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTINGACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.SERVICES
The information required by this Item about principal accountingaccountant fees and services as well as related pre-approval policies appears under the heading “Independent Public Accountants” in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.SCHEDULES
(a) (1) Financial Statements.
The following consolidated financial statements required by this item are included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the caption “Financial StatementStatements and Supplementary Data”:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income (Loss)
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
(2) Financial Statement Schedules.
All financial statement schedules have been omitted as they are either not required or not applicable, or the required information is otherwise included in our consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.
(b) Exhibits. The exhibits listed in the accompanying Exhibit Index are filed or incorporated by reference as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
EXHIBIT INDEX
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| Exhibit No. | | Description |
Exhibit No. | | Description |
| 2.1 | |
2.1 | | Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 26, 2016, by and among FARO Technologies, Inc., Laser Projection Technologies, Inc., each of the shareholders of Laser Projection Technologies, Inc. and Steven P. Kaufman in the capacity of the Seller Representative (Filed as Exhibit 2.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 30, 2016, and incorporated herein by reference)** |
| | |
3.12.2 | | Quota Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 13, 2018, by and among FARO Technologies, Inc., Opto-Tech SRL, each of the shareholders of Opto-Tech SRL, and Mr. Gianfranco Chiapparini, in the capacity as the Seller Representative (Filed as Exhibit 2.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed July 19, 2018, and incorporated herein by reference)** |
| 3.1 | | |
| | |
| 3.2 | | |
| | |
| 4.1 | | |
| | |
10.14.2 | | |
| 10.1 | |
10.2 | | |
| |
10.3 | | |
| | |
10.410.2 | | |
| | |
10.510.3 | | |
| | |
10.610.4 | | |
| 10.5 | | |
| | |
10.710.6 | | |
| | |
10.810.7 | | |
| |
10.9 | | |
| | |
10.1010.8 | | |
| | |
10.1110.9 | | |
| | |
10.1210.10 | | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | |
10.1410.12 | | |
| | |
10.1510.13 | | |
| 10.14 | | |
| | |
| 10.15 | | |
| | |
| 10.16 | | |
| | |
10.1610.17 | | |
| 10.18 | | |
| 10.19 | | |
| | |
10.1710.20 | | |
| 10.21 | | |
| | |
| 10.22 | | |
| | |
10.1810.23 | | |
| | |
10.1910.24 | | |
| 10.25 | | |
| 10.26 | | |
| 10.27 | | |
| 10.28 | | |
| | |
10.2010.29 | | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | |
| 10.30 | | |
| | |
| 10.31 | | |
| | |
| 10.32 | | |
| | |
| 10.33 | | |
| | |
10.2110.34 | | |
| | |
10.2210.35 | | |
| 10.36 | | |
| | |
10.2310.37 | | |
| | |
10.2410.38 | |
|
| | |
| 10.39 | | |
| | |
10.2510.40 | | |
| | |
10.26 | | |
| | |
10.27 | | |
| | |
21.110.41 | | |
| | |
| 21.1 | | |
| | |
| 23.1 | | |
| | |
| 24.1 | | |
| | |
| 31-A | | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | |
| 32-B | | |
| | |
99.1 | | |
| | |
101.INS | | XBRL Instance Document |
| | |
101.SCH | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
| | |
101.CAL | | XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase |
| | |
101.DEF | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
| | |
101.LAB | | XBRL Taxonomy Labels Linkbase Document |
| | |
101.PRE | | XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document |
| | |
|
| | |
*99.1 | | |
| | |
| 101 | | The following information from our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, formatted in Inline XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity; (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (vi) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
| | |
| 104 | | Cover Page Interactive Data File (Formatted in Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101) |
| | | | | |
| * | Indicates management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements |
| ** | Schedules and exhibits are omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. Registrant agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted schedules or exhibits to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request. |
ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY.SUMMARY
None.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | FARO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. |
| | | | |
| Date: | February 19, 2020 | By: | | FARO TECHNOLOGIES, INC./s/ Allen Muhich |
| | | |
Date: | February 21, 2018 | By: | | /s/ Robert Seidel |
| | | | Robert Seidel,Allen Muhich, Chief Financial Officer |
| | | | (Duly Authorized Officer) |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints each of SIMON RAAB, ROBERT SEIDELMICHAEL BURGER AND JODY GALEALLEN MUHICH his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and revocation, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this report and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| Signature | | Title | | Date |
Signature | | Title | | Date |
| | | |
/s/ Simon RaabMichael Burger | | Chairman of the Board, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) | | February 21, 201819, 2020 |
Simon RaabMichael Burger | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Robert SeidelAllen Muhich | | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) | | February 21, 201819, 2020 |
Robert SeidelAllen Muhich | | | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ John Donofrio | | Chairman of the Board and Director | | February 19, 2020 |
| John Donofrio | | | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ John Caldwell | | Director | | February 21, 201819, 2020 |
| John Caldwell | | | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ Lynn Brubaker | | Director | | February 21, 201819, 2020 |
| Lynn Brubaker | | | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ Stephen R. Cole | | Director | | February 21, 201819, 2020 |
| Stephen R. Cole | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Marvin Sambur | | Director | | February 21, 2018 |
Marvin Sambur | | | | |
| | | |
/s/ John Donofrio | | Director | | February 21, 2018 |
John Donofrio | | | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ Jeffrey A. Graves | | Director | | February 21, 201819, 2020 |
| Jeffrey A. Graves | | | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ Yuval Wasserman | | Director | | February 21, 201819, 2020 |
| Yuval Wasserman | | | | |
