Table of Contents


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K
[X]ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162017
OR
[   ]TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 for the transition period from _________ to ___________
 
Commission File
Number
Registrant; State of Incorporation;
Address and Telephone Number
IRS Employer
Identification No.
   
1-11459
PPL Corporation
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
(Pennsylvania)
Two North Ninth Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1179
(610) 774-5151
23-2758192
   
1-905
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
(Pennsylvania)
Two North Ninth Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1179
(610) 774-5151
23-0959590
   
333-173665
LG&E and KU Energy LLC
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
(Kentucky)
220 West Main Street
Louisville, Kentucky 40202-1377
(502) 627-2000
20-0523163
   
1-2893
Louisville Gas and Electric Company
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
(Kentucky)
220 West Main Street
Louisville, Kentucky 40202-1377
(502) 627-2000
61-0264150
   
1-3464
Kentucky Utilities Company
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
(Kentucky and Virginia)
One Quality Street
Lexington, Kentucky 40507-1462
(502) 627-2000
61-0247570



Table of Contents


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
   
Common Stock of PPL Corporation New York Stock Exchange
   
Junior Subordinated Notes of PPL Capital Funding, Inc.  
2007 Series A due 2067 New York Stock Exchange
2013 Series B due 2073 New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock of PPL Electric Utilities Corporation
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants are well-known seasoned issuers, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. 
PPL Corporation
Yes  X   
No        
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation
Yes        
No  X   
LG&E and KU Energy LLC
Yes        
No  X   
Louisville Gas and Electric Company
Yes        
No  X   
Kentucky Utilities Company
Yes        
No  X   
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrants are not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. 
PPL Corporation
Yes        
No  X   
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation
Yes        
No  X   
LG&E and KU Energy LLC
Yes        
No  X   
Louisville Gas and Electric Company
Yes        
No  X   
Kentucky Utilities Company
Yes        
No  X   
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
PPL Corporation
Yes  X   
No        
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation
Yes  X   
No        
LG&E and KU Energy LLC
Yes  X   
No        
Louisville Gas and Electric Company
Yes  X   
No        
Kentucky Utilities Company
Yes  X   
No        
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants have submitted electronically and posted on their corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to submit and post such files).
PPL Corporation
Yes   X  
No        
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation
Yes   X  
No        
LG&E and KU Energy LLC
Yes   X  
No        
Louisville Gas and Electric Company
Yes   X  
No        
Kentucky Utilities Company
Yes   X  
No        




Table of Contents


Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants' knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
PPL Corporation[ X ] 
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation[ X ] 
LG&E and KU Energy LLC[ X ] 
Louisville Gas and Electric Company[ X ] 
Kentucky Utilities Company[ X ] 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants are large accelerated filers, accelerated filers, non-accelerated filers, or a smaller reporting company.companies or emerging growth companies. See definition of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer", "smaller reporting company" and "smaller reporting"emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): 
 
Large accelerated
filer
Accelerated
filer
Non-accelerated
filer
Smaller reporting
company
Emerging growth company
PPL Corporation[ X ][     ][     ][     ][     ]
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation[     ][     ][ X ][     ][     ]
LG&E and KU Energy LLC[     ][     ][ X ][     ][     ]
Louisville Gas and Electric Company[     ][     ][ X ][     ][     ]
Kentucky Utilities Company[     ][     ][ X ][     ][     ]
 
If emerging growth companies, indicate by check mark if the registrants have elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
PPL Corporation[     ]
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation[     ]
LG&E and KU Energy LLC[     ]
Louisville Gas and Electric Company[     ]
Kentucky Utilities Company[     ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrants are shell companies (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). 
PPL Corporation
Yes        
No  X   
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation
Yes        
No  X   
LG&E and KU Energy LLC
Yes        
No  X   
Louisville Gas and Electric Company
Yes        
No  X   
Kentucky Utilities Company
Yes        
No  X   
 
As of June 30, 2016,2017, PPL Corporation had 677,548,721685,472,890 shares of its $0.01 par value Common Stock outstanding. The aggregate market value of these common shares (based upon the closing price of these shares on the New York Stock Exchange on that date) held by non-affiliates was $25,577,464,218.$26,500,381,927. As of January 31, 2017,2018, PPL Corporation had 680,602,000694,049,792 shares of its $0.01 par value Common Stock outstanding.
 
As of January 31, 2017,2018, PPL Corporation held all 66,368,056 outstanding common shares, no par value, of PPL Electric Utilities Corporation.
 
PPL Corporation directly holds all of the membership interests in LG&E and KU Energy LLC.
 
As of January 31, 2017,2018, LG&E and KU Energy LLC held all 21,294,223 outstanding common shares, no par value, of Louisville Gas and Electric Company.
 
As of January 31, 2017,2018, LG&E and KU Energy LLC held all 37,817,878 outstanding common shares, no par value, of Kentucky Utilities Company.
 



Table of Contents


PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company meet the conditions set forth in General Instructions (I)(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K and are therefore filing this form with the reduced disclosure format.
 
Documents incorporated by reference:
 
PPL Corporation has incorporated herein by reference certain sections of PPL Corporation's 20172018 Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after December 31, 2016.2017. Such Statements will provide the information required by Part III of this Report.




Table of Contents


PPL CORPORATION
PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES CORPORATION
LG&E AND KU ENERGY LLC
LOUISVILLE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
KENTUCKY UTILITIES COMPANY
 
FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT TO
THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20162017
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
This combined Form 10-K is separately filed by the following Registrants in their individual capacity: PPL Corporation, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company. Information contained herein relating to any individual Registrant is filed by such Registrant solely on its own behalf and no Registrant makes any representation as to information relating to any other Registrant, except that information under "Forward-Looking Information" relating to subsidiaries of PPL Corporation is also attributed to PPL Corporation and information relating to the subsidiaries of LG&E and KU Energy LLC is also attributed to LG&E and KU Energy LLC.
 
Unless otherwise specified, references in this Report, individually, to PPL Corporation, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company are references to such entities directly or to one or more of their subsidiaries, as the case may be, the financial results of which subsidiaries are consolidated into such Registrants' financial statements in accordance with GAAP. This presentation has been applied where identification of particular subsidiaries is not material to the matter being disclosed, and to conform narrative disclosures to the presentation of financial information on a consolidated basis.
 
Item Page Page
 PART I  PART I 
  
  
1.  
1A.  
1B.  
2.  
3.  
4.  
      
 PART II  PART II 
5.  
6.  
7.  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  



Table of Contents


Item  Page
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
7A. 
  
8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 
  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
  PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries 
  
  
  
  
  
  PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries 
  
  
  
  
  LG&E and KU Energy LLC and Subsidiaries 
  
  
  
  
  
  Louisville Gas and Electric Company 
  
  
  
  
  Kentucky Utilities Company 
  
  
  
  
    



Table of Contents


Item Page Page
 COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
      
 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA  SUPPLEMENTARY DATA 
 Schedule I - Condensed Unconsolidated Financial Statements  Schedule I - Condensed Unconsolidated Financial Statements 
  
  
  
  
9.  
9A.  
9B.  
  
 PART III  PART III 
10.  
11.  
12.  
13.  
14.  
  
 PART IV  PART IV 
15.  
  
  
  
    
    
    
    





Table of Contents


GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
 
PPL Corporation and its subsidiaries
 
KU - Kentucky Utilities Company, a public utility subsidiary of LKE engaged in the regulated generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity, primarily in Kentucky.
 
LG&E - Louisville Gas and Electric Company, a public utility subsidiary of LKE engaged in the regulated generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity and the distribution and sale of natural gas in Kentucky.
 
LKE - LG&E and KU Energy LLC, a subsidiary of PPL and the parent of LG&E, KU and other subsidiaries.
 
LKS - LG&E and KU Services Company, a subsidiary of LKE that provides administrative, management and support services primarily to LKE and its subsidiaries.
 
PPL - PPL Corporation, the parent holding company of PPL Electric, PPL Energy Funding, PPL Capital Funding, LKE and other subsidiaries.
 
PPL Capital Funding - PPL Capital Funding, Inc., a financing subsidiary of PPL that provides financing for the operations of PPL and certain subsidiaries. Debt issued by PPL Capital Funding is guaranteed as to payment by PPL.
 
PPL Electric - PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, a public utility subsidiary of PPL engaged in the regulated transmission and distribution of electricity in its Pennsylvania service area and that provides electricity supply to its retail customers in this area as a PLR.
 
PPL Energy Funding - PPL Energy Funding Corporation, a subsidiary of PPL and the parent holding company of PPL Global and other subsidiaries.
 
PPL EU Services - PPL EU Services Corporation, a subsidiary of PPL that provides administrative, management and support services primarily to PPL Electric.
 
PPL Global - PPL Global, LLC, a subsidiary of PPL Energy Funding that primarily through its subsidiaries, owns and operates WPD, PPL's regulated electricity distribution businesses in the U.K.
 
PPL Services - PPL Services Corporation, a subsidiary of PPL that provides administrative, management and support services to PPL and its subsidiaries.
 
PPL WPD Limited - an indirect U.K. subsidiary of PPL Global, which holdscarries a liability for a closed defined benefit pension plan and a receivable from WPD plc. Following a reorganization in October 2015 and October 2017, PPL WPD Limited is nowan indirect parent to WPD plc having previously been a sister company.
 
WPD - refers to PPL WPD Limited and its subsidiaries.
 
WPD (East Midlands) - Western Power Distribution (East Midlands) plc, a British regional electricity distribution utility company.
 
WPD plc - Western Power Distribution plc, a directan indirect U.K. subsidiary of PPL WPD Limited. Its principal indirectly owned subsidiaries are WPD (East Midlands), WPD (South Wales), WPD (South West) and WPD (West Midlands).
 
WPD Midlands - refers to WPD (East Midlands) and WPD (West Midlands), collectively.
 
WPD (South Wales) - Western Power Distribution (South Wales) plc, a British regional electricity distribution utility company.
 
WPD (South West) - Western Power Distribution (South West) plc, a British regional electricity distribution utility company.
 
WPD (West Midlands) - Western Power Distribution (West Midlands) plc, a British regional electricity distribution utility company.
 

i


Table of Contents


WKE - Western Kentucky Energy Corp., a subsidiary of LKE that leased certain non-utilitynon-regulated utility generating plants in western Kentucky until July 2009. 

Other terms and abbreviations
 
£ - British pound sterling.
 
2001 Mortgage Indenture - PPL Electric's Indenture, dated as of August 1, 2001, to the Bank of New York Mellon (as successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank), as trustee, as supplemented.
2011 Equity Unit(s) - a PPL equity unit, issued in April 2011, consisting of a 2011 Purchase Contract and, initially, a 5.0% undivided beneficial ownership interest in $1,000 principal amount of PPL Capital Funding 4.32% Junior Subordinated Notes due 2019.
2011 Purchase Contract(s) - a contract that is a component of a 2011 Equity Unit requiring holders to purchase shares of PPL common stock on or prior to May 1, 2014.
401(h) account(s) - Aa sub-account established within a qualified pension trust to provide for the payment of retiree medical costs.
 
Act 11 - Act 11 of 2012 that became effective on April 16, 2012. The Pennsylvania legislation authorized the PUC to approve two specific ratemaking mechanisms: the use of a fully projected future test year in base rate proceedings and, subject to certain conditions, a DSIC.
 
Act 129 - Act 129 of 2008 that became effective in October 2008. The law amended the Pennsylvania Public Utility Code and created an energy efficiency and conservation program and smart metering technology requirements, adopted new PLR electricity supply procurement rules, provided remedies for market misconduct and changed the Alternative Energy Portfolio Standard (AEPS).

Act 129 Smart Meter program - PPL Electric's system-wide meter replacement program that installs wireless digital meters that provide secure communication between PPL Electric and the meter as well as all related infrastructure.
  
Advanced Metering System - meters and meter readingmeter-reading systems that provide two-way communication capabilities, which communicate usage and other relevant data to LG&E and KU at regular intervals, and are also able to receive information from LG&E and KU, such as software upgrades and requests to provide meter readings in real time.

AFUDC - Allowanceallowance for Funds Used During Construction.funds used during construction. The cost of equity and debt funds used to finance construction projects of regulated businesses, which is capitalized as part of construction costs.

AIP - annual iteration process.
 
AOCI - accumulated other comprehensive income or loss.
 
ARO - asset retirement obligation.
 
ATM Program - At-the-Marketat-the-market stock offering program.
BSER - Best System of Emission Reduction. The degree of emission reduction that the EPA determines has been adequately demonstrated when taking into account the cost of achieving such reduction and any non-air quality health and environmental impact and energy requirements. 
 
Cane Run Unit 7 - a natural gas combined-cycle generating unit in Kentucky, jointly owned by LG&E and KU, with a capacity of 642 MW (141 MW and 501 MW to LG&E and KU).KU.
 
CCR(s) - Coal Combustion Residual(s)coal combustion residual(s). CCRs include fly ash, bottom ash and sulfur dioxide scrubber wastes.
 
Clean Air Act - federal legislation enacted to address certain environmental issues related to air emissions, including acid rain, ozone and toxic air emissions.
 
Clean Water Act - federal legislation enacted to address certain environmental issues relating to water quality including effluent discharges, cooling water intake, and dredge and fill activities.
 
COBRA - Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, which provides individuals the option to temporarily continue employer group health insurance coverage after termination of employment.

ii


Table of Contents

 
CPCN - Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. Authority granted by the KPSC pursuant to Kentucky Revised Statute 278.020 to provide utility service to or for the public or the construction of certain plant, equipment, property or facility for furnishing of utility service to the public.
 
Customer Choice Act - the Pennsylvania Electricity Generation Customer Choice and Competition Act, legislation enacted to restructure the state's electric utility industry to create retail access to a competitive market for generation of electricity.
 
DDCP - Directors Deferred Compensation Plan.
 

ii


Table of Contents


Depreciation not normalized - the flow-through income tax impact related to the state regulatory treatment of depreciation-related timing differences.

Distribution Automation - advanced grid intelligence enabling LG&E and KU to perform remote monitoring and control, circuit segmentation and "self-healing" of select distribution system circuits, improving grid reliability and efficiency.
 
DNO - Distribution Network Operator in the U.K.
 
DOJ - U.S. Department of Justice.
DPCR4 - Distribution Price Control Review 4, the U.K. five-year rate review period applicable to WPD that commenced April 1, 2005.
 
DPCR5 - Distribution Price Control Review 5, the U.K. five-year rate review period applicable to WPD that commenced April 1, 2010.
 
DRIP - PPL Amended and Restated Dividend Reinvestment and Direct Stock Purchase Plan.
 
DSIC - the Distribution System Improvement Charge authorized under Act 11, which is an alternative ratemaking mechanism providing more-timely cost recovery of qualifying distribution system capital expenditures.
 
DSM - Demand Side Management. Pursuant to Kentucky Revised Statute 278.285, the KPSC may determine the reasonableness of DSM programs proposed by any utility under its jurisdiction. DSM programs consist of energy efficiency programs intended to reduce peak demand and delay the investment in additional power plant construction, provide customers with tools and information regarding their energy usage and support energy efficiency. Pursuant to Kentucky Revised Statute 278.285, the KPSC may determine the reasonableness of DSM plans proposed by any utility under its jurisdiction. Proposed DSM mechanisms may seek full recovery of costs and revenues lost by implementing DSM programs and/or incentives designed to provide financial rewards to the utility for implementing cost-effective DSM programs. The cost of such programs shall be assigned only to the class or classes of customers that benefit from the programs.
DUoS -Distribution Use of System. This forms the majority of WPD's revenues and is the charge to electricity suppliers who are WPD's customers and use WPD's network to distribute electricity.
 
Earnings from Ongoing Operations - Aa non-GAAP financial measure of earnings adjusted for the impact of special items and used in "Item 7. Combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" (MD&A).
 
EBPB - Employee Benefit Plan Board. The administrator of PPL's U.S. qualified retirement plans, which is charged with the fiduciary responsibility to oversee and manage those plans and the investments associated with those plans.
 
ECR - Environmental Cost Recovery. Pursuant to Kentucky Revised Statute 278.183, Kentucky electric utilities are entitled to the current recovery of costs of complying with the Clean Air Act, as amended, and those federal, state or local environmental requirements that apply to coal combustion wastes and by-products from the production of energy from coal.
 
ELG(s) - Effluent Limitation Guidelines, regulations promulgated by the EPA.
 
EPA - Environmental Protection Agency, a U.S. government agency.
 
EPS - earnings per share.
 

iii


Table of Contents

Equity Unit(s)Fast pot - refers toUnder RIIO-ED1, Totex costs that are recovered in the 2011 Equity Units.period they are incurred.

FERC - Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the U.S. federal agency that regulates, among other things, interstate transmission and wholesale sales of electricity, hydroelectric power projects and related matters.
 
GAAP - Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the U.S.
 
GBP - British pound sterling.
 
GHG - greenhouse gas(es).
 
GLT - Gas Line Tracker.gas line tracker. The KPSC - approved mechanism for LG&E's recovery of costs associated with gas transmission lines, gas service lines, gas risers, leak mitigation, and gas main replacements.
  
GWh - gigawatt-hour, one million kilowatt hours.
 
Holdco - Talen Energy Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which was formed for the purposes of the June 1, 2015 spinoff of PPL Energy Supply, LLC.
 

iii


Table of Contents


IBEW - International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers.
 
ICP - The PPL Incentive Compensation Plan. This plan provides for incentive compensation to PPL's executive officers and certain other senior executives. New awards under the ICP were suspended in 2012 upon adoption of PPL's 2012 Stock Incentive Plan.
 
ICPKE - The PPL Incentive Compensation Plan for Key Employees. The ICPKE provides for incentive compensation to certain employees below the level of senior executive.
If-Converted Method - A method applied to calculate diluted EPS for a company with outstanding convertible debt. The method is applied as follows: Interest charges (after-tax) applicable to the convertible debt are added back to net income and the convertible debt is assumed to have been converted to equity at the beginning of the period, and the resulting common shares are treated as outstanding shares. Both adjustments are made only for purposes of calculating diluted EPS. This method was applied to PPL's Equity Units prior to settlement.
 
IRS - Internal Revenue Service, a U.S. government agency.
 
KPSC - Kentucky Public Service Commission, the state agency that has jurisdiction over the regulation of rates and service of utilities in Kentucky.
 
KU 2010 Mortgage Indenture - KU's Indenture, dated as of October 1, 2010, to The Bank of New York Mellon, as supplemented.
 
kV - kilovolt.
 
kVA - kilovolt ampere.
 
kWh - kilowatt hour, basic unit of electrical energy.
 
LCIDA - Lehigh County Industrial Development Authority.
 
LG&E 2010 Mortgage Indenture - LG&E's Indenture, dated as of October 1, 2010, to The Bank of New York Mellon, as supplemented.
 
LIBOR - London Interbank Offered Rate.
 
Margins - Aa non-GAAP financial measure of performance used in "Item 7. Combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" (MD&A). 


iv


Table of Contents

MATS- Mercury and Air Toxics Standards, regulations promulgated by the EPA.
MMBtu - Oneone million British Thermal Units.
 
MOD - Aa mechanism applied in the U.K. to adjust allowed base demand revenue in future periods for differences in prior periods between actual values and those in the agreed business plan.
 
Moody's - Moody's Investors Service, Inc., a credit rating agency.

MPR- Mid-period review, which is a review of output requirements in RIIO-ED1 that can be initiated by Ofgem halfway through the price control covering material changes to existing outputs that can be justified by clear changes in government policy or new outputs that may be needed to meet the needs of consumers and other network users.
 
MW - megawatt, one thousand kilowatts.
 
NAAQS - National Ambient Air Quality Standards periodically adopted pursuant to the Clean Air Act.
 
NERC - North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
 
NGCC - Naturalnatural gas-fired combined-cycle generating plant.
 
NPNS - the normal purchases and normal sales exception as permitted by derivative accounting rules. Derivatives that qualify for this exception may receive accrual accounting treatment.
 
NRC - Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the U.S. federal agency that regulates nuclear power facilities.
 
NSR - The new source review provisions of the Clean Air Act that impose stringent emission control requirements on new and modified sources of air emissions that result in emission increases beyond thresholds allowed by the Clean Air Act.
OCI - other comprehensive income or loss.
 

iv


Table of Contents


Ofgem - Office of Gas and Electricity Markets, the British agency that regulates transmission, distribution and wholesale sales of electricity and related matters.
 
OVEC - Ohio Valley Electric Corporation, located in Piketon, Ohio, an entity in which LKE indirectly owns an 8.13% interest (consists of LG&E's 5.63% and KU's 2.50% interests), which is accounted for as a cost-method investment. OVEC owns and operates two coal-fired power plants, the Kyger Creek plant in Ohio and the Clifty Creek plant in Indiana, with combined capacities of 2,120 MW.
 
PEDFA - Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority.

Performance unit - stock-based compensation award that represents a variable number of shares of PPL common stock that a recipient may receive based on PPL's attainment of (i) total shareowner return (TSR) over a three-year performance period as compared to companies in the Philadelphia Stock Exchange Utility Index; or (ii) corporate return on equity (ROE) based on the average of the annual ROE for each year of the three-year performance period.
 
PJM - PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., operator of the electricity transmission network and electricity energy market in all or parts of Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia and the District of Columbia.
 
PLR - Provider of Last Resort, the role of PPL Electric in providing default electricity supply within its delivery area to retail customers who have not chosen to select an alternative electricity supplier under the Customer Choice Act.
 
PP&E - property, plant and equipment.
 
PPL EnergyPlus - prior to the June 1, 2015 spinoff of PPL Energy Supply, PPL EnergyPlus, LLC, a subsidiary of PPL Energy Supply that marketed and traded wholesale and retail electricity and gas, and supplied energy and energy services in competitive markets.  
 
PPL Energy Supply - prior to the June 1, 2015 spinoff, PPL Energy Supply, LLC, a subsidiary of PPL Energy Funding and the parent company of PPL EnergyPlus and other subsidiaries.
 
PPL Montana - prior to the June 1, 2015 spinoff of PPL Energy Supply, PPL Montana, LLC, an indirect subsidiary of PPL Energy Supply, LLC that generated electricity for wholesale sales in Montana and the Pacific Northwest. 
PUC - Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, the state agency that regulates certain ratemaking, services, accounting and operations of Pennsylvania utilities.

v


Table of Contents

Purchase Contract(s) - refers collectively to the 2010 and 2011 Purchase Contracts, which are components of the 2010 and 2011 Equity Units.
RAV - regulatory asset value. This term, used within the U.K. regulatory environment, is also commonly known as RAB or regulatory asset base. RAV is based on historical investment costs at time of privatization, plus subsequent allowed additions less annual regulatory depreciation, and represents the value on which DNOs earn a return in accordance with the regulatory cost of capital. RAV is indexed to Retail Price Index (RPI) in order to allow for the effects of inflation. Since the beginning of DPCR5 in April 2010, RAV additions have been based on a percentage of annual total expenditures which have continued from April 2015 under RIIO-ED1. RAV is intended to represent expenditures that have a long-term benefit to WPD (similar to capital projects for the U.S. regulated businesses that are generally included in rate base).
 
RCRA - Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976.
 
RECs - Renewable Energy Credits.renewable energy credits.
 
Regional Transmission Expansion Plan - PJM conducts a long-range Regional Transmission Expansion Planning process that identifies changes and additions to the PJM grid necessary to ensure future needs are met for both the reliability and the economic performance of the grid. Under PJM agreements, transmission owners are obligated to build transmission projects assigned to them by the PJM Board.

Registrant(s) - refers to the Registrants named on the cover of this Report (each a "Registrant" and collectively, the "Registrants").
 
Regulation S-X - SEC regulation governing the form and content of and requirements for financial statements required to be filed pursuant to the federal securities laws.
 
RFC - ReliabilityFirstReliabilityFirst Corporation, one of eight regional entities with delegated authority from NERC that work to safeguard the reliability of the bulk power systems throughout North America.
 

v


Table of Contents


RIIO-ED1RIIO - RIIO representsOfgem's framework for setting U.K. regulated gas and electric utility price controls which stands for "Revenues = Incentive + Innovation + Outputs." RIIO-1 refers to the first generation of price controls under the RIIO framework. RIIO-ED1 refers to the initial eight-year rate review periodRIIO regulatory price control applicable to WPDthe operators of U.K. electricity distribution networks, the duration of which commencedis April 1, 2015.2015 through March 2023. RIIO-2 refers to the second generation of price controls under the RIIO framework. RIIO-ED2 refers to the second regulatory price control applicable to the operators of U.K. electricity distribution networks, which will begin in April 2023.
 
Riverstone - Riverstone Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and, as of December 6, 2016, ultimate parent company of the entities that own the competitive power generation business contributed to Talen Energy.
 
RJS Power - RJS Generation Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company controlled by Riverstone, that owns the competitive power generation business contributed by its owners to Talen Energy.

RPI - Retail Price Index,retail price index, is a measure of inflation in the United Kingdom published monthly by the Office for National Statistics.
SCRs - selective catalytic reduction, a pollution control process for the removal of nitrogen oxide from exhaust gas.
SIP - PPL Corporation's 2012 Stock Incentive Plan.
S&P - Standard & Poor's Ratings Services, a credit rating agency.
 
Sarbanes-Oxley - Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which sets requirements for management's assessment of internal controls for financial reporting. It also requires an independent auditor to make its own assessment.

SCRs - selective catalytic reduction, a pollution control process for the removal of nitrogen oxide from exhaust gas.

Scrubber - an air pollution control device that can remove particulates and/or gases (primarily sulfur dioxide) from exhaust gases.

SEC - the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, a U.S. government agency primarily responsible to protect investors and maintain the integrity of the securities markets.
 
SERC - SERC Reliability Corporation, one of eight regional entities with delegated authority from NERC that work to safeguard the reliability of the bulk power systems throughout North America.
 

SIP - PPL Corporation's Amended and Restated 2012 Stock Incentive Plan.
vi


Table of Contents
Slow pot - Under RIIO-ED1, Totex costs that are added (capitalized) to RAV and recovered through depreciation over a 20 to 45 year period.

Smart meter - an electric meter that utilizes smart metering technology.
 
Smart metering technology - technology that can measure, among other things, time of electricity consumption to permit offering rate incentives for usage during lower cost or demand intervals. The use of this technology also has the potential to strengthen network reliability.

S&P - Standard & Poor's Ratings Services, a credit rating agency.
 
Superfund - federal environmental statute that addresses remediation of contaminated sites; states also have similar statutes.
 
Talen Energy - Talen Energy Corporation, the Delaware corporation formed to be the publicly traded company and owner of the competitive generation assets of PPL Energy Supply and certain affiliates of Riverstone.
 
Talen Energy Marketing - Talen Energy Marketing, LLC, the new name of PPL EnergyPlus subsequent to the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply.
 
TCJA - Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Comprehensive U.S. federal tax legislation enacted on December 22, 2017.

Total shareowner return - the change in market value of a share of the Company's common stock plus the value of all dividends paid on a share of the common stock during the applicable performance period, divided by the price of the common stock as of the beginning of the performance period. The price used for purposes of this calculation is the average share price for the 20 trading days at the beginning and end of the applicable period.
 

vi


Table of Contents


Totex (total expenditures) - Totex generally consists of all the expenditures relating to WPD's regulated activities with the exception of certain specified expenditure items (Ofgem fees, National Grid transmission charges, property and corporate income taxes, pension deficit funding and cost of capital). The annual net additions to RAV are calculated as a percentage of Totex. Totex can be viewed as the aggregate net network investment, net network operating costs and indirect costs, less any cash proceeds from the sale of assets and scrap.

Treasury Stock Method - a method applied to calculate diluted EPS that assumes any proceeds that could be obtained upon exercise of options and warrants (and their equivalents) would be used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the relevant period.

TRU - a mechanism applied in the U.K. to true-up inflation estimates used in determining base demand revenue.

U.K. Finance Acts - refers to U.K. Finance Act of 2015 and 2016, enacted in November 2015 and September 2016 respectively, which collectively reduced the U.K. statutory corporate income tax rate from 20% to 19%, effective April 1, 2017 and from 19% to 17%, effective April 1, 2020.
 
VEBA - Voluntary Employee Benefit Association Trust, accounts for health and welfare plans for future benefit payments for employees, retirees or their beneficiaries.

Volumetric risk - the risk that the actual load volumes provided under full-requirement sales contracts could vary significantly from forecasted volumes.
 
VSCC - Virginia State Corporation Commission, the state agency that has jurisdiction over the regulation of Virginia corporations, including utilities.


vii


Table of Contents




















(THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY.)


viii


Table of Contents


Forward-looking Information
 
Statements contained in this Annual Report concerning expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance and underlying assumptions and other statements that are other than statements of historical fact are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Although the Registrants believe that the expectations and assumptions reflected in these statements are reasonable, there can be no assurance that these expectations will prove to be correct. Forward-looking statements are subject to many risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in forward-looking statements. In addition to the specific factors discussed in "Item 1A. Risk Factors" and in "Item 7. Combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in this Annual Report, the following are among the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially and adversely from the forward-looking statements.statements:
 
the outcome of rate cases or other cost recovery or revenue filings;
changes in U.S. or U.K. tax laws or regulations;regulations, including the TCJA;
effects of cyber-based intrusions or natural disasters, threatened or actual terrorism, war or other hostilities;
significant decreases in demand for electricity in the U.S.;
expansion of alternative and distributed sources of electricity generation and storage;
changes in foreign currency exchange rates for British pound sterling and the related impact on unrealized gains and losses on PPL's foreign currency economic hedges;
the effectiveness of our risk management programs, including foreign currency and interest rate hedging;
non-achievement by WPD of performance targets set by Ofgem;
the results of the potential RIIO-ED1 MPR currently being evaluated by Ofgem, with a decision as to whether to engage in such a review and the scope thereof to be announced in the spring of 2018;
the effect of changes in RPI on WPD's revenues and index linked debt;
the effect of the June 23, 2016 referendum indevelopments related to ongoing negotiations regarding the U.K.'s intent to withdraw from the European Union and any actions taken in response thereto;
defaults by counterparties or suppliers for energy, capacity, coal, natural gas or key commodities, goods or services;
capital market conditions, including the availability of capital or credit, changes in interest rates and certain economic indices, and decisions regarding capital structure;
a material decline in the market value of PPL's equity;
significant decreases in the fair value of debt and equity securities and its impact on the value of assets in defined benefit plans, and the potential cash funding requirements if fair value declines;
interest rates and their effect on pension and retiree medical liabilities, ARO liabilities and interest payable on certain debt securities;
volatility in or the impact of other changes in financial markets and economic conditions;
the potential impact of any unrecorded commitments and liabilities of the Registrants and their subsidiaries;
new accounting requirements or new interpretations or applications of existing requirements;
changes in the corporate credit ratings or securities analyst rankings of the Registrants and credit ratings;their securities;
any requirement to record impairment charges pursuant to GAAP with respect to any of our significant investments;
laws or regulations to reduce emissions of "greenhouse" gasesGHGs or the physical effects of climate change;
continuing ability to access fuel supply for LG&E and KU, as well as the ability to recover fuel costs and environmental expenditures in a timely manner at LG&E and KU and natural gas supply costs at LG&E;
fuel supply for LG&E and KU;
weather and other conditions affecting generation, transmission and distribution operations, operating costs and customer energy use;
changes in political, regulatory or economic conditions in states, regions or countries where the Registrants or their subsidiaries conduct business;
receipt of necessary governmental permits and approvals;
new state, federal or foreign legislation or regulatory developments;
the impact of any state, federal or foreign investigations applicable to the Registrants and their subsidiaries and the energy industry;
our ability to attract and retain qualified employees;
the effect of any business or industry restructuring;
development of new projects, markets and technologies;
performance of new ventures;
business dispositions or acquisitions and our ability to realize expected benefits from such business transactions;
collective labor bargaining negotiations; and
the outcome of litigation against the Registrants and their subsidiaries.



1


Table of Contents


Any such forward-looking statements should be considered in light of suchthese important factors and in conjunction with other documents of the Registrants on file with the SEC.

Table of Contents


New factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for the Registrants to predict all such factors, or the extent to which any such factor or combination of factors may cause actual results to differ from those contained in any forward-looking statement. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and the Registrants undertake no obligation to update the information contained in suchthe statement to reflect subsequent developments or information.

 


2


Table of Contents


PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS
 
General
 
(All Registrants)
 
PPL Corporation, headquartered in Allentown, Pennsylvania, is a utility holding company, incorporated in 1994, in connection with the deregulation of electricity generation in Pennsylvania, to serve as the parent company to the regulated utility, PPL Electric, and to generation and other unregulated business activities. PPL Electric was founded in 1920 as Pennsylvania Power & Light Company. PPL, through its regulated utility subsidiaries, delivers electricity to customers in the U.K., Pennsylvania, Kentucky, Virginia and Tennessee; delivers natural gas to customers in Kentucky; and generates electricity from power plants in Kentucky. In June 2015, PPL completed the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply, which combined its competitive power generation businesses with those of Riverstone to form a new, stand-alone, publicly traded company named Talen Energy. See "Spinoff of PPL Energy Supply" below for more information.
 
PPL's principal subsidiaries at December 31, 20162017 are shown below (* denotes a Registrant).
 
       PPL Corporation*       
              
                  
           
PPL Capital Funding
 Provides financing for the operations of PPL and certain subsidiaries
  
             
                  
                  
 
PPL Global
 Engages in the regulated distribution of electricity in the U.K.
  
LKE*
 
  
PPL Electric*
 Engages in the regulated transmission and distribution of electricity in Pennsylvania
 
                  
                  
    
LG&E*
 Engages in the regulated generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity and the regulated distribution and sale of natural gas in Kentucky
  
KU*
 Engages in the regulated generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity, primarily in Kentucky
    
                
 
U.K.
Regulated Segment
  
Kentucky
Regulated Segment
  
Pennsylvania
Regulated Segment
 
 
PPL Global is not a registrant, however, unauditedregistrant. Unaudited annual consolidated financial statements for the U.K. Regulated Segment are furnished contemporaneously with this report on a Form 8-K with the SEC.

In addition to PPL, the other Registrants included in this filing are as follows.
 
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, headquartered in Allentown, Pennsylvania, is a direct wholly owned subsidiary of PPL organized in Pennsylvania in 1920 and a regulated public utility that is an electricity transmission and distribution service provider in eastern and central Pennsylvania. PPL Electric is subject to regulation as a public utility by the PUC, and certain of its transmission activities are subject to the jurisdiction of the FERC under the Federal Power Act. PPL Electric delivers electricity in its Pennsylvania service area and provides electricity supply to retail customers in that area as a PLR under the Customer Choice Act.
 
LG&E and KU Energy LLC, headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky, is a wholly owned subsidiary of PPL and a holding company that owns regulated utility operations through its subsidiaries, LG&E and KU, which constitute substantially all of LKE's assets. LG&E and KU are engaged in the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity. LG&E also


3


Table of Contents


engages in the distribution and sale of natural gas. LG&E and KU maintain separate corporate identities and serve customers in Kentucky under their respective names. KU also serves customers in Virginia under the Old Dominion Power name and in Tennessee under the KU name. LKE, formed in 2003, is the successor to a Kentucky entity incorporated in 1989.
 
Louisville Gas and Electric Company, headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky, is a wholly owned subsidiary of LKE and a regulated utility engaged in the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity and distribution and sale of natural gas in Kentucky. LG&E is subject to regulation as a public utility by the KPSC, and certain of its transmission activities are subject to the jurisdiction of the FERC under the Federal Power Act. LG&E was incorporated in 1913.

Kentucky Utilities Company, headquartered in Lexington, Kentucky, is a wholly owned subsidiary of LKE and a regulated utility engaged in the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity in Kentucky, Virginia and Tennessee. KU is subject to regulation as a public utility by the KPSC and the VSCC, and certain of its transmission and wholesale power activities are subject to the jurisdiction of the FERC under the Federal Power Act. KU serves its Virginia customers under the Old Dominion Power name and its Kentucky and Tennessee customers under the KU name. KU was incorporated in Kentucky in 1912 and in Virginia in 1991.
 
(PPL)
Spinoff of PPL Energy Supply
In June 2014, PPL and PPL Energy Supply executed definitive agreements with affiliates of Riverstone to spin off PPL Energy Supply and immediately combine it with Riverstone's competitive power generation businesses to form a new, stand-alone, publicly traded company named Talen Energy. On April 29, 2015, PPL's Board of Directors declared the June 1, 2015 distribution to PPL's shareowners of record on May 20, 2015 of a newly formed entity, Holdco, which at closing owned all of the membership interests of PPL Energy Supply and all of the common stock of Talen Energy.
Immediately following the spinoff on June 1, 2015, Holdco merged with a special purpose subsidiary of Talen Energy, with Holdco continuing as the surviving company to the merger and as a wholly owned subsidiary of Talen Energy and the sole owner of PPL Energy Supply. Substantially contemporaneous with the spinoff and merger, RJS Power was contributed by its owners to become a subsidiary of Talen Energy. PPL's shareowners received approximately 0.1249 shares of Talen Energy common stock for each share of PPL common stock they owned on May 20, 2015. Following completion of these transactions, PPL shareowners owned 65% of Talen Energy and affiliates of Riverstone owned 35%. The spinoff had no effect on the number of PPL common shares owned by PPL shareowners or the number of shares of PPL common stock outstanding. The transaction is intended to be tax-free to PPL and its shareowners for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
PPL has no continuing ownership interest in or control of Talen Energy and Talen Energy Supply (formerly PPL Energy Supply).
See Note 8 to the Financial Statements for additional information.

Segment Information
 
(PPL)
 
PPL is organized into three reportable segments as depicted in the chart above: U.K. Regulated, Kentucky Regulated, and Pennsylvania Regulated. The U.K. Regulated segment has no related subsidiary Registrants. PPL's other reportable segments' results primarily represent the results of its related subsidiary Registrants, except that the reportable segments are also allocated certain corporate level financing and other costs that are not included in the results of the applicable subsidiary Registrants. PPL also has corporate and other costs which primarily include financing costs incurred at the corporate level that have not been allocated or assigned to the segments, as well as certain other unallocated costs. As a result of the June 1, 2015 spinoff of PPL Energy Supply, PPL no longer has a Supply segment.

Table The operations of Contents

the Supply segment are included in "Loss from Discontinued Operations (net of income taxes)" on the Statements of Income.

A comparison of PPL's three regulated segments is shown below:below.
  Kentucky Pennsylvania  Kentucky Pennsylvania
U.K. Regulated Regulated RegulatedU.K. Regulated Regulated Regulated
For the year ended December 31, 2016:     
For the year ended December 31, 2017:     
Operating Revenues (in billions)$2.2
 $3.1
 $2.2
$2.1
 $3.2
 $2.2
Net Income (in millions)$1,246
 $398
 $338
$652
 $286
 $359
Electricity delivered (GWh)74,728
 33,006
 36,645
74,317
 31,839
 35,996
At December 31, 2016: 
  
  
At December 31, 2017: 
  
  
Regulatory Asset Base (in billions) (a)$8.5
 $8.9
 $6.1
$9.8
 $9.2
 $6.9
Service area (in square miles)21,600
 9,400
 10,000
21,600
 9,400
 10,000
End-users (in millions)7.8
 1.3
 1.4
7.9
 1.3
 1.4
 
(a)Represents RAV for U.K. Regulated, capitalization for Kentucky Regulated and rate base for Pennsylvania Regulated. For U.K. Regulated, RAV is lower for 2016 compared with 2015 due to the effect of foreign currency exchange rates.
 
See Note 2 to the Financial Statements for additional financial information about the segments.
 
(PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU)
 
PPL Electric has two operating segments that are aggregated into a single reportable segment. LKE, LG&E and KU are individually single operating and reportable segments.

U.K. Regulated Segment (PPL)

Consists of PPL Global, which primarily includes WPD's regulated electricity distribution operations, the results of hedging the translation of WPD's earnings from British pound sterling into U.S. dollars, and certain costs, such as U.S. income taxes, administrative costs and acquisition-related financing costs.



4


Table of Contents


WPD through indirect wholly owned subsidiaries, operates four of the 1514 Ofgem regulated distribution networksDNOs providing electricity service in the U.K. through indirect wholly owned subsidiaries: WPD (South West), WPD (South Wales), WPD (East Midlands) and WPD (West Midlands). The number of network customers (end-users) served by WPD totals 7.87.9 million across 21,600 square miles in south Wales and southwest and central England.
 
Revenues, in millions, for the years ended December 31 are shown below. 
 2016 2015 2014
Operating Revenues$2,207
 $2,410
 $2,621
 2017 2016 2015
Operating Revenues (a)$2,091
 $2,207
 $2,410
 
(a)WPD’s Operating Revenues are translated from GBP to U.S. dollars using the average GBP to U.S. dollar exchange rates in effect each month. The annual weighted average of the monthly GBP to U.S. dollar exchange rates used for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 were $1.28 per GBP, $1.37 per GBP and $1.53 per GBP.
The majority of WPD's operating revenue is known as DUoS and is generated by providing regulated electricity distribution services to licensed third party energy suppliers who pay WPD for the use of WPD's distribution network to transfer electricity to the suppliers' customers, the end-users.

Franchise and Licenses

TheWPD’s operations of WPD's principal subsidiaries, WPD (South West), WPD (South Wales), WPD (East Midlands) and WPD (West Midlands), are regulated by Ofgem under the direction of the Gas and Electricity Markets Authority. Ofgem is a non-ministerial government department and an independent National Regulatory Authority that is responsible for protecting the interests of existing and future electricity and natural gas consumers. The Electricity Act 1989 provides the fundamental framework for electricity companies and established licenses that require each of the DNOs to develop, maintain and operate efficient distribution networks. WPD’s operations are regulated under these licenses which set the outputs WPD needs to deliver for their customers and associated revenues WPD is allowed to earn. WPD operates under a regulatory year that begins April 1 and ends March 31 of each year.
WPD is authorized by Ofgem to provide electricity distribution services within its concession areas and service territories, subject to certain conditions and obligations. For instance, WPD is subject to Ofgem regulation with respect to the regulated revenue it can earn and the quality of service it must provide, and WPD can be fined or have its licenses revoked if it does not meet the mandated standard of service.

Ofgem has the formal powerspower to propose modifications to each distribution license. In January 2014, Ofgemlicense; however licensees can appeal such changes to the U.K.’s Competition and WPD agreedMarkets Authority in the event of a disagreement with the regulator. Generally, any potential changes to these licenses are reviewed with stakeholders in a formal regulatory consultation process prior to a reduction of £5 per residential end-user in the 2014/15 regulatory year to be recovered in the 2016/17 regulatory year. See "Item 7. Combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Overview - U.K. Distribution Revenue Reduction" for additional information.

Table of Contents

formal change proposal.

Competition

Although WPD operates in non-exclusive concession areas in the U.K., it currently faces little competition with respect to end-users connected to its network. WPD's four distribution businesses are, therefore, regulated monopolies, which operate under regulatory price controls.

Revenue and Regulation
Ofgem has adopted a price control mechanism that establishes the amount of base demand revenue WPD can earn, subject to certain true-ups, and provides for an increase or reduction in revenues based on incentives or penalties for performance relative to pre-established targets. WPD's allowed revenue primarily includes base demand revenue (adjusted for inflation using RPI), performance incentive revenues or penalties, adjustments for over- or under-recovery from prior periods and adjustments related to the DPCR4 line loss close out.
WPD is currently operating under the eight-year price control period of RIIO-ED1, which commenced on April 1, 2015. The RIIO framework is intended to:
encourage DNOs to deliver safe, reliable and sustainable network service at long-term value to customers;
enable DNOs to finance required investment in a timely and efficient way;
remunerate DNOs according to their delivery for customers;
increase emphasis on outputs and incentives;
enhance stakeholder engagement including network customers;
provide a stronger incentive framework to encourage more efficient investment and innovation; and
continue to stimulate innovation.

Additionally, from a financial perspective the RIIO-ED1 framework:
regulates revenues for the DNOs in real terms using 2012/13 prices;
inflates revenue components using the RPI beginning March 31, 2013, which has the effect of inflating RAV, with respect to base demand revenue;
splits the recovery of Totex between immediate recovery (called "fast pot") and deferred recovery as an addition to the RAV (called "slow pot");
provides DNOs with a general pass-through for costs over which the DNOs have no control (i.e., Ofgem fees, National Grid transmission charges and property taxes);
provides a tax allowance based on Ofgem's notional tax charge, which may not equal the actual corporate tax paid;
extends the recovery period for depreciation of RAV additions after April 1, 2015 from a 20 year life as used under DPCR5, to 45 years, with a transitional arrangement that will gradually increase the average asset life for RAV additions during RIIO-ED1 to approximately 35 years. The RAV as of March 31, 2015 will continue to be depreciated over 20 years. The asset lives used to determine depreciation expense for U.S. GAAP purposes are not the same as those used for the depreciation of the RAV in setting revenues and, as such, vary by asset type and are based on the expected useful lives of the assets;
provides successful DNOs an incentive to be fast-tracked through the regulatory approval process, equivalent to 2.5% of Totex during the 8-year price control period; and
maintains an incentive scheme for DNOs to be rewarded or penalized for performance in the areas of reliability and customer satisfaction, but places a maximum cap on the amount of incentive revenues that can be earned by a DNO.

The key components of WPD's four Ofgem-accepted RIIO-ED1 business plans are:
all four DNO business plans were accepted for fast-track status (fast-track incentive is worth approximately $35 million annually for WPD assuming a $1.30/£ foreign currency exchange rate);
WPD received a higher level of cost savings retention, which was established at 70% for WPD compared to approximately 55% for slow-tracked DNOs;
a cost of debt recovery comprised of a 10-year trailing average debt allowance, to be adjusted annually, compared to a 20-year trailing average for slow-tracked DNOs applied to 65% of RAV;
a return on regulatory equity (RORE) allowance with an equity ratio of 35% of RAV and a cost of equity rate of 6.4% compared to 6.0% for slow-tracked DNOs;
a Totex split of 80% slow pot and 20% fast pot;
recovery of approximately 80% of pension deficit funding for certain of WPD's defined benefit pension plans; and
incentive targets that are significantly more stringent than those set under DPCR5, reducing the expected incentive revenues WPD can earn in RIIO-ED1 compared to DPCR5.


Table of Contents

WPD's combined business plans include funding for total expenditures of approximately $16.6 billion over the eight-year period (assuming a $1.30/£ foreign currency exchange rate), broken down as follows:
Totex - $11.0 billion ($8.8 billion additions to RAV; $2.2 billion fast pot);
Pension deficit funding - $1.6 billion;
Cost of debt recovery - $1.3 billion;
Property taxes, Ofgem fees and National Grid transmissions charges - $2.1 billion; and
Corporate income taxes recovery - $600 million.

The U.K. regulatory structure is an incentive-based structure in contrast to the typical U.S. regulatory structure, which operates on a cost-recovery model. The base demand revenue that a DNO can earn in each year of the current price control period is the sum of:
a return on capital from RAV;
a return of capital from RAV (i.e., depreciation);
the fast pot recovery;
pension deficit funding;
an allowance for cash taxes paid less a potential reduction for tax benefits from excess leverage if a DNO is levered more than 65% Debt/RAV;
certain pass-through costs over which the DNO has no control;
certain legacy price control adjustments from preceding price control periods, including the information quality incentive (also known as the rolling RAV incentive);
fast-track incentive - because WPD's four DNOs were fast-tracked through the price control review process for RIIO-ED1, their base demand revenue also includes the fast-track incentive discussed above;
profiling adjustments - these adjustments do not affect the total base demand revenue in real terms over the eight-year price control period, but change the year in which the revenue is earned;
adjustments from the Annual Iteration Process (AIP), discussed further below; and
adjustments for inflation true-ups, discussed further below.

In addition to base demand revenue, WPD's allowed revenue primarily includes:
an increase or reduction in revenues based on incentives or penalties for actual performance against pre-established targets from prior periods;
adjustments for over- or under-recovery of allowed revenue from prior periods; and
a reduction in revenue related to the DPCR4 line loss close out.

During DPCR5, the prior price control review period, WPD's total base demand revenue for the five-year period was profiled in a manner that resulted in a weighted-average increase of about 5.5% per year for all four DNOs. In the first year of RIIO-ED1, base demand revenue decreased by about 11.8% primarily due to a change in profiling methodology and a lower weighted-average cost of capital. Base demand revenue will then increase by approximately 2.5% per annum before inflation for regulatory years up to March 31, 2018 and by approximately 1% per annum before inflation for each regulatory year thereafter for the remainder of RIIO-ED1.
As the regulatory model is incentive based rather than a cost recovery model, WPD is not subject to accounting for the effects of certain types of regulation as prescribed by GAAP. Therefore, the accounting treatment of adjustments to base demand revenue and/or allowed revenue is evaluated based on revenue recognition and contingency accounting guidance.
Base Demand Revenue True-up Mechanisms
Unlike prior price control reviews, base demand revenue under RIIO-ED1 will be adjusted during the price control period. The most significant of those adjustments are:

Inflation True-Up - The base demand revenue for the RIIO-ED1 period was set in 2012/13 prices. Therefore an inflation factor as determined by forecasted RPI, provided by HM Treasury, is applied to base demand revenue. Forecasted RPI is trued up to actuals and affects future base demand revenue two regulatory years later. This revenue change is called the "TRU" adjustment.
The TRU for the 2015/16 regulatory year was a $40 million reduction to revenue and will reduce base demand revenue in calendar years 2017 and 2018 by $27 million and $13 million, respectively.
The projected TRU for the 2016/17 regulatory year is a $6 million reduction to revenue and will reduce base demand revenue in calendar years 2018 and 2019 by $4 million and $2 million, respectively.

Annual Iteration Process - The RIIO-ED1 price control period also includes an Annual Iteration Process (AIP). This will allow future base demand revenues agreed with the regulator as part of the price control review to be updated

Table of Contents

during the price control period for financial adjustments including tax, pensions and cost of debt, legacy price control adjustments from preceding price control periods and adjustments relating to actual and allowed total expenditure together with the Totex Incentive Mechanism (TIM). Under the TIM, WPD's DNOs are able to retain 70% of any amounts not spent against the RIIO-ED1 plan and bear 70% of any over-spends. The AIP calculates an incremental change to base demand revenue, known as the "MOD" adjustment.
The MOD provided by Ofgem in November 2016 included the TIM for the 2015/16 regulatory year as well as the cost of debt calculation based on the 10-year trailing average to October 2016. This MOD of $15 million will reduce base demand revenue in calendar years 2017 and 2018 by $10 million and $5 million, respectively.
The projected MOD for the 2016/17 regulatory year is a $52 million reduction to revenue and will reduce base demand revenue in calendar years 2018 and 2019 by $35 million and $17 million, respectively.
As both MOD and TRU are changes to future base demand revenues as determined by Ofgem, these adjustments are recognized as a component of revenues in future years in which service is provided and revenues are collected or returned to customers. PPL's projected earnings per share growth rate through 2020 includes both the TRU and MOD for regulatory year 2015/16 and the estimated TRU and MOD for 2016/17.
Allowed Revenue Components
In addition to base demand revenue, certain other items are added or subtracted to arrive at allowed revenue. The most significant of these are discussed below.
Incentives: Ofgem has established incentives to provide opportunities for DNO's to enhance overall returns by improving network efficiency, reliability and customer service. Some of the more significant incentives that may affect allowed revenue include:
Interruptions Incentive Scheme (IIS) - This incentive has two major components: (1) Customer interruptions (CIs) and (2) Customer minutes lost (CMLs), and both are designed to incentivize the DNOs to invest in and operate their networks to manage and reduce both the frequency and duration of power outages. The IIS target under RIIO-ED1 is divided into interruptions caused by planned and unplanned work. The target for planned interruptions is calculated as the annual average level of planned interruptions and minutes lost over a previous three-year period. The targets for unplanned interruptions for RIIO-ED1 are specified in the DNOs license, and targets for both the CIs and CMLs become more demanding each year.

In addition to the IIS, the broad measure of customer service is enhanced in RIIO-ED1. This broad measure encompasses:
customer satisfaction in supply interruptions, connections and general inquiries;
complaints;
stakeholder engagement; and
delivery of social obligations.

The following table shows the amount of incentive revenue, primarily from IIS, that WPD has earned during DPCR5 and RIIO-ED1: 
  Incentive Earned Regulatory Year Ended Incentive
Regulatory Year Ended (in millions) Included in Revenue
March 2012 $83
 March 2014
March 2013 104
 March 2015
March 2014 117
 March 2016
March 2015 110
 March 2017
March 2016 99
 March 2018
Based on applicable GAAP, incentive revenues are recorded in revenues when they are billed to customers.
DPCR4 Line Loss Adjustment
For regulatory years 2015/16 through 2018/19, allowed revenue will also be reduced to reflect Ofgem's final decision on the DPCR4 line loss incentives and penalties mechanism. WPD has a liability recorded related to this future revenue reduction and, therefore, this will not impact future earnings. See Note 6 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
Correction Factor
During the price control period, WPD sets its tariffs to recover allowed revenue. However, in any fiscal period, WPD's revenue could be negatively affected if its tariffs and the volume delivered do not fully recover the allowed revenue for a particular

Table of Contents

period. Conversely, WPD could over-recover revenue. Over and under-recoveries are subtracted from or added to allowed revenue in future years, known as the "Correction Factor" or "K-factor." Over and under-recovered amounts arising for periods beginning with the 2014/15 regulatory year and refunded/recovered under RIIO-ED1 will be refunded/recovered on a two year lag (previously one year). Therefore, the 2014/15 over/under-recovery adjustment will occur in the 2016/17 regulatory year. Under this mechanism, in the 2016/17 regulatory year, WPD will recover the £5 per residential network customer reduction given through reduced tariffs in 2014/15. As a result, revenues were positively affected by $39 million in calendar year 2016 and are projected to be positively affected by $16 million in calendar year 2017.
Historically, tariffs have been set a minimum of three months prior to the beginning of the regulatory year (April 1). In February 2015, Ofgem determined that, beginning with the 2017/18 regulatory year, tariffs would be established a minimum of fifteen months in advance. Therefore, in December 2015, WPD was required to establish tariffs for 2016/17 and 2017/18. This change will potentially increase volatility in future revenue forecasts due to the need to forecast components of allowed revenue including MOD, TRU, K-factor and incentive revenues.
See Note 1 to the Financial Statements for additional information on revenue recognition.

See "Item 1A. Risk Factors - Risks Related to U.K. Regulated Segment" for additional information on the risks associated with the U.K. Regulated Segment.

Customers
 
WPD provides regulated electricity distribution services to licensed third party energy suppliers who use WPD's networks to transfer electricity to their customers, the end-users. WPD bills energy suppliers for this service and the supplier is responsible for billing its end-users. Ofgem requires that all licensed electricity distributors and suppliers become parties to the Distribution Connection and Use of System Agreement. This agreement specifies how creditworthiness will be determined and, as a result, whether the supplier needs to collateralize its payment obligations.

WPD’s costs make up approximately 16% of a U.K. end-user customer’s electricity bill.

U.K. Regulation and Rates
Overview
Ofgem has adopted a price control regulatory framework with a balanced objective of enhancing and developing electricity networks for the future, controlling costs to customers and allowing DNOs, such as WPD's DNOs, to earn a fair return on their investments. This regulatory structure is focused on outputs and performance in contrast to traditional U.S. utility ratemaking that operates under a cost recovery model. Price controls are established based on long-term business plans developed by each DNO with substantial input from its stakeholders. To measure the outputs and performance, each DNO business plan includes incentive targets that allow for increases and/or reductions in revenues based on operational performance, which are intended to align returns with quality of service, innovation and customer satisfaction.

For comparative purposes, amounts listed below are in British pounds sterling, nominal prices and in calendar years unless otherwise noted.



5


Table of Contents


Key Ratemaking Mechanisms

PPL believes the U.K. electricity utility model is a premium jurisdiction in which to do business due to its significant stakeholder engagement, incentive-based structure and high-quality ratemaking mechanisms.

Current Price Control: RIIO-ED1
WPD is currently operating under an eight-year price control period called RIIO-ED1, which commenced for electricity distribution companies on April 1, 2015. The regulatory framework is based on an updated approach for sustainable network regulation known as the "RIIO" model where Revenue = Incentives + Innovation + Outputs.

The RIIO framework allows for a MPR, which is a review halfway through the price control period to assess potential changes in outputs during the price control period. The scope of the potential MPR was originally limited to material changes to outputs that can be justified by clear changes in government policy and the introduction of new outputs that are needed to meet the needs of consumers and other network users. Ofgem is currently consulting on the scope of the potential MPR. See "Item 7. Combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Overview - Financial and Operational Developments - Regulatory Requirements" for additional information.

In coordination with numerous stakeholders, WPD developed its business plans for RIIO-ED1 building off its historical track record and long-term strategy of delivering industry-leading levels of performance at an efficient level of cost. As a result, all four of WPD’s DNOs' business plans were accepted by Ofgem as "well justified" and were "fast-tracked" ahead of all of the other DNOs. WPD's DNOs were rewarded for being fast-tracked with preferential financial incentives, a higher return on equity and higher cost savings retention under their business plans as discussed further below.

WPD's combined RIIO-ED1 business plans include funding for total expenditures of approximately £12.8 billion (nominal) over the eight-year period, broken down as follows:

Totex - £8.5 billion (£6.8 billion recovered as additions to RAV over time ("Slow pot"); £1.7 billion recovered in the year spent in the plan ("Fast pot"));
Pension deficit funding - £1.2 billion;
Cost of debt recovery - £1.0 billion;
Pass Through Charges - £1.6 billion (Property taxes, Ofgem fees and National Grid transmissions charges); and
Corporate income taxes recovery - £0.5 billion.

The chart below illustrates the building blocks of allowed revenue and GAAP net income for the U.K. Regulated Segment. The revenue components are shown in either 2012/13 prices or nominal prices, consistent with the formulas Ofgem established for RIIO-ED1. The reference numbers included in each block correspond with the descriptions that follow.
(a)Primarily pension deficit funding, pass through costs, profiling adjustments and legacy price control adjustments.
(b)Primarily pass through true-ups and £5 per residential customer reduction.



6


Table of Contents



(c)Reference Form 8-K filed February 22, 2018 for U.K. Regulated Segment GAAP Statement of Income component values.
(d)Includes GAAP pension costs/income (see “Defined Benefits, Net periodic defined benefit costs (credits)” in Note 11 to the Financial Statements).
(e)Primarily property taxes.
(f)Primarily gains and losses on foreign currency hedges.
(g)Includes WPD interest and $32 million of allocated interest expense to finance the acquisition of WPD Midlands.
(h)GAAP income taxes represent an effective tax rate of 19% for 2017, 16% for 2016 and approximately 17% going forward.

(1) Base Revenue

The base revenue that a DNO can collect in each year of the current price control period is the sum of the following which are discussed further below:

a return on capital from RAV;
a return of capital from RAV (i.e., depreciation);
the Fast pot recovery, see discussion “(4) Expenditure efficiency mechanisms” below;
an allowance for cash taxes paid less a potential reduction for tax benefits from excess leverage if a DNO is levered more than 65% Debt/RAV;
pension deficit funding
certain pass-through costs over which the DNO has no control;
profiling adjustments, see discussion “(6) Other revenue included in base revenue” below;
certain legacy price control adjustments from preceding price control periods, including the information quality incentive (also known as the rolling RAV incentive); and
fast-track incentive - because WPD's four DNOs were fast-tracked through the price control review process for RIIO-ED1, their base demand revenue also includes the fast-track incentive.

(2) Real Return on capital from RAV

Real-time returns on cost of regulated equity (real) - Ofgem establishes an allowed return on regulated equity that DNOs earn in their base business plan revenues as a consideration of the financial parameters for each RIIO-ED1 business plan. For WPD, the base cost of equity collected in revenues was set at 6.4% (real). Base equity returns exclude inflation adjustments, allowances for incentive rewards/penalties and over/under collections driven by cost efficiencies. WPD’s base equity returns are calculated using an equity ratio of 35% of RAV at the DNO. The equity ratio was reviewed and set during the RIIO-ED1 business plan process taking various stakeholder impacts into consideration such as costs to consumers, credit ratings and investor needs. The amounts of base real equity return, for 2017 and 2016 were £151 million and £144 million.

Indexed cost of debt recovery (real) - As part of WPD’s fast-track agreement with Ofgem for RIIO-ED1, WPD collects in revenues an assumed real cost of debt that is derived from a historical 10-year bond index (iBoxx) and adjusted annually for inflation. This calculated real cost of debt is then applied to 65% of RAV at the DNOs to determine the cost of debt revenue recovery. The cost of debt was set at 2.55% in the original "well justified" business plans. The recovery amounts are trued up annually as a component of the MOD true-up mechanism described within "(9) MOD and Inflation True-Up (TRU)" below.

Actual interest expense is reflective of prior financing activities and any financing required to fund capital expenditures. Therefore, the amount collected in revenues may differ from the actual interest expense recorded in the Statements of Income. Currently, WPD is under-recovering its DNO-related interest expense and is expected to continue to under-recover through the remainder of RIIO-ED1.

Interest costs relating to debt issued at WPD’s holding companies are not recovered in revenues and for 2017 and 2016 were approximately £49 million and £54 million.

(3) Recovery of depreciation in revenues - Recovery of depreciation in regulatory revenues is one of the key mechanisms Ofgem uses to support financeable business plans that provide incentives to attract the continued substantial investment required in the U.K. Differences between GAAP and regulatory depreciation exist primarily due to differing assumptions on asset lives and because RAV is adjusted for inflation using RPI.

Compared to asset lives established for GAAP, asset lives established for ratemaking are set by Ofgem based on economic lives which results in improved near-term revenues and cash flows for DNOs during investment cycles. Under U.K. regulation prior to RIIO-ED1, electric distribution assets were depreciated on a 20-year asset life for the purpose of setting revenues. After review and consultation, Ofgem decided to use 45-year asset lives for RAV additions after April 1, 2015, with transitional arrangements available for DNOs that fully demonstrated a need to ensure a financeable plan. WPD adopted a transition that


7


Table of Contents


has a linear increase in asset lives from 20 to 45 years for additions to RAV in each year of RIIO-ED1 (with additions averaging a life of approximately 35 years over this period), which adds support to its credit metrics. RAV additions prior to March 31, 2015 continue to be recovered in revenues over 20 years.

The asset lives used to determine depreciation expense for GAAP purposes are not the same as those used for the depreciation of the RAV in setting revenues and, as such, vary by asset type and are based on the expected useful lives of the assets. Effective January 1, 2015 after completing a review of the useful lives of its distribution network assets, WPD set the weighted average useful lives to 69 years for GAAP depreciation expense.

Because Ofgem uses a real cost of capital, the RAV and recovery of depreciation are adjusted for inflation using RPI. The inflation revenues collected in this line item help recover the cost of equity and debt returns on a "nominal" basis, compared to the "real" rates used to set the return component of base revenues.

This regulatory construct, in combination with the different assets lives used for ratemaking and GAAP, results in amounts collected by WPD as recovery of depreciation in revenues being significantly higher than the amounts WPD recorded for depreciation expense under GAAP. For 2017 and 2016, this difference was £424 million and £415 million (pre-tax) and positively impacted net income. We expect this difference to continue in the £400 million to £450 million (pre-tax) range at least through 2022 (the last full calendar year of RIIO-ED1) assuming RPI of approximately 3.0% per year from 2018 through 2022 and based on expected RAV additions of approximately £800 million per year to prepare the distribution system for future U.K. energy objectives while maintaining premier levels of reliability and customer service.

(4) Expenditure efficiency mechanisms -Ofgem introduced the concept of Totex in RIIO to ensure all DNOs face equal incentives in choosing between operating and capital solutions. Totex is split between immediate recovery (called "Fast pot") and deferred recovery as an addition to the RAV (called "Slow pot"). The ratio of Slow pot to Fast pot was determined by each DNO in their business plan development. WPD established a Totex split of 80% Slow pot and 20% Fast pot for RIIO-ED1 to balance maximizing RAV growth with immediate cost recovery to support investment grade credit ratings. Comparatively, other DNOs on average used a ratio of approximately 70% Slow pot and 30% Fast pot for RIIO-ED1.

Ofgem also allows a Totex Incentive Mechanism that is intended to reward DNOs for cost efficiency. WPD's DNOs are able to retain 70% of any amounts not spent against its RIIO-ED1 plan and bear 70% of any over-spends. Any amounts to be returned to customers are trued up in the AIP discussed below.

Because Fast pot cost recovery represents 20% of Totex expenditures and certain other costs are recovered in other aspects of revenue, Fast pot will not equal operation and maintenance expenses recorded for GAAP purposes.

(5) Income Tax Allowance - For price control purposes, WPD collects income tax based on Ofgem’s notional tax charge, which will not equal the amount of income tax expense recorded for GAAP purposes. The following table shows the amount of taxes collected in revenues and recorded under GAAP.
  2017 2016
Taxes collected in revenues £57
 £53
Taxes recorded under GAAP 139
 119

(6) Other revenue included in base revenue - Other revenue included in base revenue primarily consists of pension deficit funding, pass through costs, profiling adjustments and legacy price control adjustments.

Recovery of annual (normal) pension cost and pension deficit funding - Ofgem allows DNOs to recover annual (normal) pension costs through the Totex allocation, split between the previously described Fast pot (immediate recovery) and Slow pot recovery (as an addition to RAV). The amount of normal pension cost is computed by the pension trustees, using assumptions that differ from those used in calculating pension costs/income under GAAP. In addition, the timing of the revenue collection may not match the actual pension payment schedule, resulting in a timing difference of cash flows.

In addition, WPD recovers approximately 80% of pension deficit funding for certain of WPD's defined benefit pension plans in conjunction with actual costs similar to the Fast pot mechanism. The pension deficit is determined by the pension trustees on a triennial basis in accordance with their funding requirements. Pension deficit funding recovered in revenues was £142 million and £139 million in 2017 and 2016.

See Note 11 to the Financial Statements for additional information on pension costs/income recognized under GAAP.


8


Table of Contents



Recovery of pass through costs - WPD recovers certain pass-through costs over which the DNO has no control such as property taxes, National Grid transmission charges and Ofgem fees. Although these items are intended to be pass-through charges there could be timing differences, primarily related to property taxes, as to when amounts are collected in revenues and when amounts are expensed in the Statements of Income. WPD over-collected property taxes by £19 million and £8 million in 2017 and 2016. WPD expects to continue to over-recover property taxes until the end of RIIO-ED1. Amounts under-or over-recovered in revenues in a regulatory year are trued up through revenues two regulatory years later.

Profiling adjustments - Ofgem permitted DNOs the flexibility to make profiling adjustments to their base revenues within their business plans. These adjustments do not affect the total base revenue in real terms over the eight-year price control period, but change the year in which the revenue is collected. In the first year of RIIO-ED1, WPD’s base revenue decreased by 11.8% compared to the final year of the prior price control period (DPCR5), primarily due to a change in profiling methodology and a lower weighted-average cost of capital. Base revenue then increases by approximately 2.5% per annum before inflation for regulatory years up to March 31, 2018 and by approximately 1% per annum before inflation for each regulatory year thereafter for the remainder of RIIO-ED1.

(7) Incentives for developing high-quality business plans (known as fast-tracking) - For RIIO-ED1, Ofgem incentivized DNOs with certain financial rewards to develop "well justified" business plans that drive value to customers. WPD was awarded the following incentives for being fast-tracked by Ofgem:

an annual fast-track revenue incentive worth 2.5% of Totex (approximately £25 million annually for WPD);
a real cost of equity rate of 6.4% compared to 6.0% for slow-tracked DNOs; and,
cost savings retention was established at 70% for WPD compared to approximately 55% for slow-tracked DNOs.

(8) Allowed Revenue -Allowed revenue is the amount that a DNO can collect from its customers in order to fund its investment requirements.

Base revenues are adjusted annually during RIIO-ED1 to arrive at allowed revenues. These adjustments are discussed in sections (9) through (13) below.

(9) MOD and Inflation True-Up (TRU)
MOD - RIIO-ED1 includes an AIP that allows future base revenues, agreed with the regulator as part of the price control review, to be updated during the price control period for financial adjustments including taxes, pensions, cost of debt, legacy price control adjustments from preceding price control periods and adjustments relating to actual and allowed total expenditure together with the Totex Incentive Mechanism (TIM). The AIP calculates an incremental change to base revenue, known as the "MOD" adjustment.

The MOD provided by Ofgem in November 2016 included the TIM for the 2015/16 regulatory year, as well as the cost of debt calculation based on the 10-year trailing average to October 2016. This MOD of £12 million reduced base revenue in calendar years 2017 and 2018 by £8 million and £4 million.
The MOD provided by Ofgem in November 2017 for the 2016/17 regulatory year is a £39 million reduction to revenue and will reduce base revenue in calendar years 2018 and 2019 by £26 million and £13 million.
The projected MOD for the 2017/18 regulatory year is a £45 million reduction to revenue and is expected to reduce base revenue in calendar years 2019 and 2020 by £30 million and £15 million.

TRU - As discussed below in "(10) Inflation adjusted, multi-year rate cycle," the base revenue for the RIIO-ED1 period was set based on 2012/13 prices. Therefore an inflation factor as determined by forecasted RPI, provided by HM Treasury, is applied to base revenue. Forecasted RPI is trued up to actuals and affects future base revenue two regulatory years later. This revenue change is called the "TRU" adjustment.

The TRU for the 2015/16 regulatory year was a £31 million reduction to revenue and reduced base revenue in calendar years 2017 and 2018 by £21 million and £10 million.
The TRU for the 2016/17 regulatory year was a £6 million reduction to revenue and will reduce base revenue in calendar years 2018 and 2019 by £4 million and £2 million.
The projected TRU for the 2017/18 regulatory year is a £5 million increase to revenue and is expected to increase base revenue in calendar years 2019 and 2020 by £3 million and £2 million.



9


Table of Contents


As both MOD and TRU are changes to future base revenues as determined by Ofgem, these adjustments are recognized as a component of revenues in future years in which service is provided and revenues are collected or returned to customers. PPL's projected earnings per share growth rate through 2020 includes both the TRU and MOD for regulatory years 2015/16 and 2016/17 and the estimated TRU and MOD for 2017/18.

(10) Inflation adjusted, multi-year rate cycle - Ofgem built its price control framework to better coincide with the long-term nature of electricity distribution investments. The current price control for electricity distribution is for the eight-year period from April 1, 2015 through March 31, 2023. This both required and enabled WPD to design a base business plan with predictable revenues and expenses over the long-term to drive value for its customers through predetermined outputs and for its investors through preset base returns. A key aspect to the multi-year cycle is an annual inflation adjustment for revenue and cost components, which are inflated using RPI from the base 2012/13 prices used to establish the business plans. Consistent with Ofgem’s formulas, the inflation adjustment is applied to base revenue, MOD and TRU when determining allowed revenue. This inflation adjustment also has the effect of inflating RAV, and real returns are earned on the inflated RAV.

(11) Incentive revenues for strong operational performance and innovation - Ofgem has established incentives to provide opportunities for DNOs to enhance overall returns by improving network efficiency, reliability and customer service. These incentives can result in an increase or reduction in revenues based on incentives or penalties for actual performance against pre-established targets based on past performance. Some of the more significant incentives that may affect allowed revenue include the Interruptions Incentive Scheme (IIS), the broad measure of customer service (BMCS) and the time to connect (TTC) incentive:

The IIS has two major components: (1) Customer interruptions (CIs) and (2) Customer minutes lost (CMLs), and both are designed to incentivize the DNOs to invest in and operate their networks to manage and reduce both the frequency and duration of power outages.
The BMCS encompasses customer satisfaction in supply interruptions, connections and general inquiries, complaints, stakeholder engagement and delivery of social obligations.
The TTC incentive rewards DNOs for reducing connection times for minor connections against an Ofgem set target.

The annual incentives and penalties are reflected in customer rates on a two-year lag from the time they are earned and/or assessed. Based on applicable GAAP, incentive revenues and penalties are recorded in revenues when they are billed to customers. The following table shows the amount of incentive revenues (in total), primarily from IIS, BMCS and TTC that WPD has received and is projected to receive on a calendar year basis:
  Incentive Received Calendar Year Ended Incentive
Calendar Year Ended Incentive Earned (in millions) Included in Revenue
2014 £83
 2016
2015 79
 2017
2016 76
 2018
2017 (a) 65-80
 2019
2018 (a) 70-85
 2020
(a)Reflects projected incentive revenues.

(12) Correction Factor (K-factor) - During the price control period, WPD sets its tariffs to recover allowed revenue. However, in any fiscal period, WPD's revenue could be negatively affected if its tariffs and the volume delivered do not fully recover the allowed revenue for a particular period. Conversely, WPD could over-recover revenue. Over- and under-recoveries are subtracted from or added to allowed revenue in future years, known as the "Correction Factor" or "K-factor." Over and under-recovered amounts during RIIO-ED1 will be refunded/recovered two regulatory years later. The K-factors created in the 2016/17 and 2015/16 regulatory years were not significant.

Historically, tariffs have been set a minimum of three months prior to the beginning of the regulatory year (April 1). In February 2015, Ofgem determined that, beginning with the 2017/18 regulatory year, tariffs would be established a minimum of fifteen months in advance. Therefore, in December 2015, WPD was required to establish tariffs for the 2016/17 and 2017/18 regulatory years. This change will potentially increase volatility in future revenue forecasts due to the need to forecast components of allowed revenue including MOD, TRU, K-factor and incentive revenues.




10


Table of Contents


(13)Other Allowed Revenue -Other Allowed Revenue primarily consists of pass through true-ups and £5 per residential customer reduction. For a discussion on property tax true-ups, see recovery of pass through costs in "(6) Other revenue included in base revenue" above.

In the 2016/17 regulatory year, WPD recovered a £5 per residential network customer reduction given through reduced tariffs in 2014/15. As a result, revenues were positively affected in calendar years 2017 and 2016 by £13 million and £25 million.

(14) GAAP Operating Revenue - Operating revenue under GAAP primarily consists of allowed revenue that has been collected in the calendar year converted to U.S. dollars. It also includes miscellaneous revenue primarily from engineering recharge work and ancillary activity revenue. Engineering recharge is work performed for a third party by WPD which is not for general network maintenance or to increase reliability. Examples are diversions and running new lines and equipment for a new housing complex. Ancillary activity revenue includes revenue primarily from WPD’s Telecoms and Property companies. For additional information on ancillary activity revenue, see footnote c in "Item 7. Combined Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operation - Reconciliation of Margins." The amounts of miscellaneous revenue for 2017 and 2016 were £90 million and £84 million, however, the margin or profit on these activities was not significant.

(15) Currency Hedging - Earnings generated by PPL's U.K. subsidiaries are subject to foreign currency translation risk. Due to the significant earnings contributed from WPD, PPL enters into foreign currency contracts to economically hedge the value of the GBP versus the U.S. dollar. These hedges do not receive hedge accounting treatment under GAAP. See "Overview- Financial and Operational Developments - U.K. Membership in European Union" in "Item 7. Combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for a discussion of U.K. earnings hedging activity.

GAAP Accounting implications:

As the regulatory model in the U.K. is incentive based rather than a cost recovery model, WPD is not subject to accounting for the effects of certain types of regulation as prescribed by GAAP. Therefore, the accounting treatment for the accelerated recovery of depreciation, pension deficit funding, cost of debt recovery, income tax recovery and the adjustments to base revenue and/or allowed revenue is evaluated primarily based on revenue recognition guidance.

See "Revenue Recognition" in Note 1 to the Financial Statements for additional information.

See "Item 1A. Risk Factors - Risks related to our U.K. Regulated Segment" for additional information on the risks associated with the U.K. Regulated Segment.

Kentucky Regulated Segment (PPL)

Consists of the operations of LKE, which owns and operates regulated public utilities engaged in the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity and distribution and sale of natural gas, representing primarily the activities of LG&E and KU. In addition, certain acquisition-related financing costs are allocated to the Kentucky Regulated segment.  

(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
 
LG&E and KU, direct subsidiaries of LKE, are engaged in the regulated generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity in Kentucky and, in KU's case, Virginia and Tennessee. LG&E also engages in the distribution and sale of natural gas in Kentucky. LG&E provides electric service to approximately 407,000411,000 customers in Louisville and adjacent areas in Kentucky, covering approximately 700 square miles in nine counties and provides natural gas service to approximately 324,000326,000 customers in its electric service area and eight additional counties in Kentucky. KU provides electric service to approximately 521,000525,000 customers in 77 counties in central, southeastern and western Kentucky, approximately 28,000 customers in five counties in southwestern Virginia, and fourthree customers in Tennessee, covering approximately 4,800 non-contiguous square miles. KU also sells wholesale electricity to 1110 municipalities in Kentucky under load following contracts.
 


11


Table of Contents


Details of operating revenues, in millions, by customer class for the years ended December 31 are shown below. 
 2016 2015 2014
 Revenue 
% of
Revenue
 Revenue 
% of
Revenue
 Revenue 
% of
Revenue
LKE           
Commercial$834
 27
 $816
 26
 $815
 26
Industrial601
 19
 628
 20
 627
 20
Residential1,261
 40
 1,245
 40
 1,281
 40
Retail - other288
 9
 267
 9
 279
 9
Wholesale - municipal116
 4
 114
 4
 109
 3
Wholesale - other (a)41
 1
 45
 1
 57
 2
Total$3,141
 100
 $3,115
 100
 $3,168
 100


Table of Contents
 2017 2016 2015
 Revenue 
% of
Revenue
 Revenue 
% of
Revenue
 Revenue 
% of
Revenue
LKE           
Commercial$854
 27
 $834
 27
 $816
 26
Industrial603
 19
 601
 19
 628
 20
Residential1,259
 40
 1,261
 40
 1,245
 40
Other (a)280
 9
 288
 9
 267
 9
Wholesale - municipal112
 4
 116
 4
 114
 4
Wholesale - other (b)48
 1
 41
 1
 45
 1
Total$3,156
 100
 $3,141
 100
 $3,115
 100

(a)Primarily includes revenues from street lighting and other public authorities.
(b)Includes wholesale power and transmission revenues.
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Revenue 
% of
Revenue
 Revenue 
% of
Revenue
 Revenue 
% of
Revenue
Revenue 
% of
Revenue
 Revenue 
% of
Revenue
 Revenue 
% of
Revenue
LG&E                      
Commercial$442
 31
 $436
 30
 $433
 28
$453
 31
 $442
 31
 $436
 30
Industrial185
 13
 199
 14
 194
 13
187
 13
 185
 13
 199
 14
Residential627
 44
 633
 44
 650
 43
637
 44
 627
 44
 633
 44
Retail - other135
 9
 117
 8
 130
 8
Wholesale - other (a) (b)41
 3
 59
 4
 126
 8
Other (a)123
 8
 135
 9
 117
 8
Wholesale - other (b)53
 4
 41
 3
 59
 4
Total$1,430
 100
 $1,444
 100
 $1,533
 100
$1,453
 100
 $1,430
 100
 $1,444
 100

(a)Includes wholesale powerPrimarily includes revenues from street lighting and transmission revenues.other public authorities.
(b)Includes wholesale power and transmission revenues. Also includes intercompany power sales and transmission revenues, which are eliminated upon consolidation at LKE.
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Revenue 
% of
Revenue
 Revenue 
% of
Revenue
 Revenue 
% of
Revenue
Revenue 
% of
Revenue
 Revenue 
% of
Revenue
 Revenue 
% of
Revenue
KU                      
Commercial$392
 22
 $380
 22
 $382
 22
$401
 23
 $392
 22
 $380
 22
Industrial416
 24
 429
 25
 433
 25
416
 24
 416
 24
 429
 25
Residential634
 36
 612
 35
 631
 36
622
 36
 634
 36
 612
 35
Retail - other153
 9
 150
 9
 149
 9
Other (a)157
 9
 153
 9
 150
 9
Wholesale - municipal116
 7
 114
 7
 109
 6
112
 6
 116
 7
 114
 7
Wholesale - other (a) (b)38
 2
 43
 2
 33
 2
Wholesale - other (b)36
 2
 38
 2
 43
 2
Total$1,749
 100
 $1,728
 100
 $1,737
 100
$1,744
 100
 $1,749
 100
 $1,728
 100
 
(a)Includes wholesale powerPrimarily includes revenues from street lighting and transmission revenues.other public authorities.
(b)Includes wholesale power and transmission revenues. Also includes intercompany power sales and transmission revenues, which are eliminated upon consolidation at LKE.

Franchises and Licenses
 
LG&E and KU provide electricity delivery service, and LG&E provides natural gas distribution service, in their respective service territories pursuant to certain franchises, licenses, statutory service areas, easements and other rights or permissions granted by state legislatures, cities or municipalities or other entities. 
 
Competition

There are currently no other electric public utilities operating within the electric service areas of LKE. From time to time, bills are introduced into the Kentucky General Assembly which seek to authorize, promote or mandate increased distributed generation, customer choice or other developments. Neither the Kentucky General Assembly nor the KPSC has adopted or approved a plan or timetable for retail electric industry competition in Kentucky. The nature or timing of legislative or regulatory actions, if any, regarding industry restructuring and their impact on LKE, which may be significant, cannot currently


12


Table of Contents


be predicted. Virginia, formerly a deregulated jurisdiction, has enacted legislation that implemented a hybrid model of cost-based regulation. KU's operations in Virginia have been and remain regulated.
 
Alternative energy sources such as electricity, oil, propane and other fuels indirectly impact LKE'sLG&E's natural gas revenues. Marketers may also compete to sell natural gas to certain large end-users. LG&E's natural gas tariffs include gas price pass-through mechanisms relating to its sale of natural gas as a commodity; therefore, customer natural gas purchases from alternative suppliers do not generally impact LG&E's profitability. Some large industrial and commercial customers, however, may physically bypass LG&E's facilities and seek delivery service directly from interstate pipelines or other natural gas distribution systems.

Power Supply
 
At December 31, 2016,2017, LKE owned, controlled or had a minority ownership interest in generating capacity of 8,0118,017 MW, of which 2,9162,920 MW related to LG&E and 5,0955,097 MW related to KU, in Kentucky, Indiana, and Ohio. See "Item 2. Properties - Kentucky Regulated Segment" for a complete list of LKE's generating facilities.
 

Table of Contents

The system capacity of LKE's owned or controlled generation is based upon a number of factors, including the operating experience and physical condition of the units, and may be revised periodically to reflect changes in circumstances.
 
During 2016,2017, LKE's Kentucky power plants generated the following amounts of electricity.
GWhGWh
Fuel SourceLKE LG&E KULKE LG&E KU
Coal (a)28,029
 11,722
 16,307
28,519
 12,161
 16,358
Oil / Gas6,357
 1,463
 4,894
Gas4,625
 1,105
 3,520
Hydro408
 321
 87
337
 278
 59
Solar18
 7
 11
Total (b)34,794
 13,506
 21,288
33,499
 13,551
 19,948

(a)Includes 864794 GWh of power generated by and purchased from OVEC for LKE, 598549 GWh for LG&E and 266245 GWh for KU.
(b)
This generation represents a 0.1% increase3.7% decrease for LKE, a 0.6% decrease0.3% increase for LG&E and a 0.4% increase6.3% decrease for KU from 20152016 output.

The majority of LG&E's and KU's generated electricity was used to supply their retail and KU's municipal customer base.
 
LG&E and KU jointly dispatch their generation units with the lowest cost generation used to serve their retail and municipal customers. When LG&E has excess generation capacity after serving its own retail customers and its generation cost is lower than that of KU, KU purchases electricity from LG&E and vice versa.
 
As a result of environmental requirements and energy efficiency measures, KU retiredanticipates retiring two older coal-fired units at the E.W. Brown plant in 2019 with a combined summer rating capacity of 161 MW, at the Green River plant in September 2015. LG&E retired a 240 MW coal-fired unit in March 2015 and two additional coal-fired units, with a combined capacity of 323 MW, in June 2015 at the Cane Run plant. KU retired a 71 MW coal-fired unit at the Tyrone plant in 2013. 272 MW.

In June 2016, LG&E and KU completed construction activities and placed into commercial operation a 10 MW solar generating facility at the E.W. Brown generating site.

In 2016, Additionally, LG&E and KU received approval from the KPSC to develop a 4 MW solar share facility to service a solar share program. The solar share program is an optional, voluntary program that allows customers to subscribe capacity in the solar share facility. Construction is expected to begin, in 500-kilowatt phases, when subscription is complete. As of December 31, 2017, LG&E and KU have not yet constructed the first solar share facility and are actively marketing the program and continue to receive interest from customers.

In 2015, KU retired two coal-fired units, with a combined capacity of 161 MW, at the Green River plant. Additionally, LG&E retired three coal-fired units with a combined capacity of 563 MW, at the Cane Run plant.

Fuel Supply
 
Coal continuesand natural gas will continue to be the predominant fuel used by LG&E and KU for generation for the foreseeable future. As a result of Cane Run Unit 7 being placed into operation during 2015, naturalNatural gas used for generation is also a prominent fuel. The natural gas for this generating unit isprimarily purchased using contractual arrangements separate from LG&E's natural gas distribution operations. Natural gas and oil will continue to be used for intermediate and peaking capacity and flame stabilization in coal-fired boilers.
 


13


Table of Contents


Fuel inventory is maintained at levels estimated to be necessary to avoid operational disruptions at coal-fired generating units. Reliability of coal deliveries can be affected from time to time by a number of factors including fluctuations in demand, coal mine production issues and other supplier or transporter operating difficulties.
 
LG&E and KU have entered into coal supply agreements with various suppliers for coal deliveries through 2023 and augment their coal supply agreements with spot market purchases, as needed.
 
For their existing units, LG&E and KU expect for the foreseeable future to purchase most of their coal from western Kentucky, southern Indiana and southern Illinois. LG&E and KU continue to purchase certain quantities of ultra-low sulfur content coal from Wyoming for blending at Trimble County Unit 2. Coal is delivered to the generating plants primarily by barge and rail.
 
To enhance the reliability of natural gas supply, LG&E and KU have secured firm long-term pipeline transport capacity with contracts of various durations from 2019 to 2024 on the interstate pipeline serving Cane Run Unit 7. This pipeline also serves the six simple cycle combustion turbine units located at the Trimble County site as well as four other simple cycle units at the Cane Run and Paddy's Run sites. LG&E has also secured long-term firm pipeline transport capacity on an interstate pipeline for the summer months through October 2018 to serve an additional simple cycle gas turbine operated under a tolling agreement.agreement that ends April 30, 2019. For the seven simple cycle combustion turbines at the E.W. Brown facility, no firm long-term pipeline transport capacity has been purchased due to the facility being interconnected to two pipelines and some of the units having dual fuel capability.
 
LG&E and KU have firm contracts for a portion of the natural gas fuel for Cane Run Unit 7 for delivery in future months. The bulk of the natural gas fuel remains purchased on the spot market.


Table of Contents

(PPL, LKE and LG&E)

Natural Gas Distribution Supply
 
Five underground natural gas storage fields, with a current working natural gas capacity of approximately 15 billion cubic feet (Bcf), are used in providing natural gas service to LG&E's firm sales customers. By using natural gas storage facilities, LG&E avoids the costs typically associated with more expensive pipeline transportation capacity to serve peak winter heating loads. Natural gas is stored during the summer season for withdrawal during the following winter heating season. Without this storage capacity, LG&E would be required to purchase additional natural gas and pipeline transportation services during winter months when customer demand increases and the prices for natural gas supply and transportation services can be expected to be at their highest. At December 31, 2016,2017, LG&E had 12 Bcf of natural gas stored underground with a carrying value of $42$43 million.

LG&E has a portfolio of supply arrangements of varying durations and terms that provide competitively priced natural gas designed to meet its firm sales obligations. These natural gas supply arrangements include pricing provisions that are market-responsive. In tandem with pipeline transportation services, these natural gas supplies provide the reliability and flexibility necessary to serve LG&E's natural gas customers.
 
LG&E purchases natural gas supply transportation services from two pipelines. LG&E has contracts with one pipeline that are subject to termination by LG&E between 20182020 and 2021.2023. Total winter season capacity under these contracts is 184,900 MMBtu/day and summer season capacity is 60,000 MMBtu/day. With this same pipeline, LG&E also has another contract for pipeline capacity through 2026 in the amount of 60,000 MMBtu/day during both the winter and summer seasons. LG&E has a single contract with a second pipeline with a total capacity of 20,000 MMBtu/day during both the winter and summer seasons that expires in 2018.2023.
 
LG&E expects to purchase natural gas supplies for its gas distribution operations from onshore producing regions in South Texas, East Texas, North Louisiana and Arkansas, as well as gas originating in the Marcellus and Utica production areas.
 
(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)

Transmission

LG&E and KU contract with the Tennessee Valley Authority to act as their transmission reliability coordinator and contract with TranServ International, Inc. to act as their independent transmission operator.organization.
 


14


Table of Contents


Rates
 
LG&E is subject to the jurisdiction of the KPSC and the FERC, and KU is subject to the jurisdiction of the KPSC, the FERC and the VSCC. LG&E and KU operate under a FERC-approved open access transmission tariff.
 
LG&E's and KU's Kentucky base rates are calculated based on a return on capitalization (common equity, long-term debt and short-term debt) including adjustments for certain net investments and costs recovered separately through other means. As such, LG&E and KU generally earn a return on regulatory assets in Kentucky.

KU's Virginia base rates are calculated based on a return on rate base (net utility plant plus working capital less deferred taxes and miscellaneous deductions). As all regulatory assets and liabilities, except the levelized fuel factor, are excluded from the return on rate base utilized in the calculation of Virginia base rates, no return is earned on the related assets.
 
KU's rates to 1110 municipal customers for wholesale power requirements are calculated based on annual updates to a formula rate that utilizes a return on rate base (net utility plant plus working capital less deferred taxes and miscellaneous deductions). As all regulatory assets and liabilities, except regulatory assets recorded for AROs related to CCR impoundments, are excluded from the return on rate base utilized in the development of municipal rates, no return is earned on the related assets. In April 2014, nine municipalities submitted notices of termination, under the notice period provisions, to cease taking power under the wholesale requirements contracts. Such terminations are to be effective in 2019, except in the case of one municipality with a 2017 effective date.that terminated service in 2017.

Rate Case Proceedings

On(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)

In November 23, 2016, LG&E and KU filed requests with the KPSC for increases in annual base electricity rates of approximately $103 million at KU and an increase in annual base electricity and gas rates of approximately $94 million and $14 million at LG&E. The proposed base rate increases would result in an electricity rate increase of 6.4% at KU and

Table of Contents

electricity and gas rate increases of 8.5% and 4.2% at LG&E. New rates are expected to become effective on July 1, 2017.rates. LG&E's and KU's applications includeincluded requests for CPCNs for implementing an Advanced Metering System program and a Distribution Automation program. The applications are based on

In April and May 2017, LG&E and KU, along with all intervening parties to the proceeding, filed with the KPSC, stipulation and recommendation agreements (stipulations) resolving all issues with the parties. Among other things, the proposed stipulations provided for increases in annual revenue requirements associated with LG&E base electricity rates of $59 million, LG&E base gas rates of $8 million and KU base electricity rates of $55 million, reflecting a forecasted test year of July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018 and a requested return on equity of 10.23%9.75%, the withdrawal of LG&E's and KU's request for a CPCN for the Advanced Metering System and other changes to the revenue requirements, which dealt primarily with the timing of cost recovery, including depreciation rates.

In June 2017, the KPSC issued orders approving, with certain modifications, the proposed stipulations filed in April and May 2017. The orders modified the stipulations to provide for increases in annual revenue requirements associated with LG&E base electricity rates of $57 million, LG&E base gas rates of $7 million, KU base electricity rates of $52 million and incorporated an authorized return on equity of 9.7%. A numberConsistent with the stipulations, the orders approved LG&E's and KU's request for implementing a Distribution Automation program and their withdrawal of parties have been granted intervention requests ina request for a CPCN for the proceedings. Data discovery and the filing of written testimony will continue through April 2017. A public hearing on the applications is scheduled to commence on May 2, 2017.Advanced Metering System program. The orders also approved new depreciation rates for LG&E and KU cannot predictthat resulted in higher depreciation of approximately $15 million ($4 million for LG&E and $11 million for KU) in 2017, exclusive of net additions to PP&E. The orders resulted in base electricity and gas rate increases of 5.2% and 2.1% at LG&E and a base electricity rate increase of 3.2% at KU. The new base rates and all elements of the outcomeorders became effective July 1, 2017. On June 23, 2017, the KPSC issued orders establishing an authorized return on equity of these proceedings.9.7% for all of LG&E's and KU's existing approved ECR plans and projects, replacing the prior authorized return on equity levels of 9.8% for CCR projects and 10% for all other ECR approved projects, effective with bills issued in August 2017. The annual impact of the new authorized return for ECR projects is not expected to be significant.

(LKE and KU)

On September 29, 2017, KU filed a request seeking approval from the VSCC to increase annual Virginia base electricity revenue by $7 million, representing an increase of 10.4%. KU's request is based on an authorized 10.42% return on equity. Subject to regulatory review and approval, new rates would become effective July 1, 2018.



15


Table of Contents


(PPL, LKE and KU)

In October 31, 2016, KU filed a request with the FERC to modify its formula rates to provide for the recovery of CCR impoundment closure costs from its departing municipal customers. OnIn December 30, 2016, the FERC accepted the revised rate schedules providing recovery of the costs effective December 31, 2016, subject to refund, and established limited hearing and settlement judge procedures relating to determining the applicable amortization period. In March 2017, the parties reached a settlement in principle regarding a suitable amortization period. In June 2017, a FERC judge issued an order implementing the settlement's rates on an interim basis, effective July 1, 2017. In August 2017, the FERC issued a final order approving the settlement.

TCJA Impact on LG&E and KU Rates

(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)

On December 21, 2017, Kentucky Industrial Utility Customers, Inc. submitted a complaint with the KPSC against LG&E and KU, as well as other utility companies in Kentucky, alleging that their respective rates would no longer be fair, just and reasonable following the enactment of the TCJA reducing the federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. The complaint requested the KPSC to issue an order requiring LG&E and KU to begin deferring, as of January 1, 2018, the revenue requirement effect of all income tax expense savings resulting from the federal corporate income tax reduction, including the amortization of excess deferred income taxes by recording those savings in a regulatory liability account and establishing a process by which the federal corporate income tax savings will be passed back to customers.

On December 27, 2017, as a result of the complaint, the KPSC ordered LG&E and KU to satisfy or address the complaint and commence recording regulatory liabilities to reflect the reduction in the federal corporate tax rate to 21% and the associated savings in excess deferred taxes on an interim basis until utility rates are adjusted to reflect the federal tax savings.

On January 8, 2018, LG&E and KU responded to the complaint, denying certain claims in the complaint but concurring that the TCJA will result in savings for their customers. LG&E and KU have stated in their responses that the companies have recorded regulatory liabilities as of December 31, 2017 to reflect the reduction in the federal corporate tax rate and the associated savings in excess deferred taxes and will make changes to their ECR, DSM and LG&E's GLT rate mechanisms to begin providing the applicable savings to customers. LG&E and KU also offered to establish a new bill credit mechanism effective with the April 2018 billing cycle to begin distributing the tax savings associated with base rates to customers.

On January 29, 2018, LG&E and KU reached a settlement agreement to commence returning savings related to the TCJA to their customers. The savings will be distributed through their ECR, DSM and LG&E's GLT rate mechanisms beginning in March 2018 and through a new bill credit mechanism from April 1, 2018 through April 30, 2019. The estimated impact of the rate reduction represents approximately $91 million in KU electricity revenues, $69 million in LG&E electricity revenues and $17 million in LG&E gas revenues for the period January 2018 through April 2019. Ongoing tax savings are expected to also be addressed in LG&E's and KU's next Kentucky base rate case. LG&E and KU have indicated their intent to file an application for base rate changes during 2018 to be effective during spring 2019. The settlement agreement is subject to review and approval by the KPSC. An order in the proceeding may occur during the first quarter of 2018.

Additionally, on January 8, 2018, the VSCC ordered KU, as well as other utilities in Virginia, to accrue regulatory liabilities reflecting the Virginia jurisdictional revenue requirement impacts of the reduced federal corporate tax rate.

The FERC has not issued any guidance on the effect on rates of the TCJA. 

LG&E and KU cannot predict the outcome of these proceedings.

See Note 6 to the Financial Statements for additional information on cost recovery mechanisms.



16


Table of Contents


Pennsylvania Regulated Segment (PPL)

Consists of PPL Electric, a regulated public utility engaged in the distribution and transmission of electricity.
 
(PPL and PPL Electric)
 
PPL Electric delivers electricity to approximately 1.4 million customers in a 10,000-square mile territory in 29 counties of eastern and central Pennsylvania. PPL Electric also provides electricity supply to retail customers in this area as a PLR under the Customer Choice Act.
 
Details of revenues, in millions, by customer class for the years ended December 31 are shown below. 
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Revenue % of Revenue Revenue % of Revenue Revenue % of RevenueRevenue % of Revenue Revenue % of Revenue Revenue % of Revenue
Distribution                      
Residential$1,327
 61
 $1,338
 63
 $1,285
 63
$1,351
 62
 $1,327
 61
 $1,338
 63
Industrial42
 2
 58
 3
 52
 3
44
 2
 42
 2
 58
 3
Commercial338
 16
 377
 18
 367
 18
349
 16
 338
 16
 377
 18
Other (a)(4) 
 (44) (2) 5
 
(36) (2) (4) 
 (44) (2)
Transmission453
 21
 395
 18
 335
 16
487
 22
 453
 21
 395
 18
Total$2,156
 100
 $2,124
 100
 $2,044
 100
$2,195
 100
 $2,156
 100
 $2,124
 100
 
(a)Includes regulatory over- or under-recovery reconciliation mechanisms, pole attachment revenues and street lighting, offset by contra revenue associated with the network integration transmission service expense.

Franchise, Licenses and Other Regulations

PPL Electric is authorized to provide electric public utility service throughout its service area as a result of grants by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in corporate charters to PPL Electric and companies, which it has succeeded and as a result of certification by the PUC. PPL Electric is granted the right to enter the streets and highways by the Commonwealth subject to certain conditions. In general, such conditions have been met by ordinance, resolution, permit, acquiescence or other action by an appropriate local political subdivision or agency of the Commonwealth.

Competition

Pursuant to authorizations from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the PUC, PPL Electric operates a regulated distribution monopoly in its service area. Accordingly, PPL Electric does not face competition in its electricity distribution business. Pursuant to the Customer Choice Act, generation of electricity is a competitive business in Pennsylvania, and PPL Electric does not own or operate any generation facilities.
 
The PPL Electric transmission business, operating under a FERC-approved PJM Open Access Transmission Tariff, is subject to competition pursuant to FERC Order 1000 from entities that are not incumbent PJM transmission owners with respect to the construction and ownership of transmission facilities within PJM.


Table of Contents

Rates and Regulation
 
Transmission
 
PPL Electric's transmission facilities are within PJM, which operates the electricity transmission network and electric energy market in the Mid-Atlantic and Midwest regions of the U.S.
 
PJM serves as a FERC-approved Regional Transmission Operator (RTO) to promote greater participation and competition in the region it serves. In addition to operating the electricity transmission network, PJM also administers regional markets for energy, capacity and ancillary services. A primary objective of any RTO is to separate the operation of, and access to, the transmission grid from market participants that buy or sell electricity in the same markets. Electric utilities continue to own the transmission assets and to receive their share of transmission revenues, but the RTO directs the control and operation of the transmission facilities. Certain types of transmission investment are subject to competitive processes outlined in the PJM tariff.



17


Table of Contents


As a transmission owner, PPL Electric's transmission revenues are recovered through PJM and billed in accordance with a FERC-approved Open Access Transmission Tariff that allows recovery of incurred transmission costs, a return on transmission-related plant and an automatic annual update based on a formula-based rate recovery mechanism. Under this formula, rates are put into effect in June of each year based upon prior year actual expenditures and current year forecasted capital additions. Rates are then adjusted the following year to reflect actual annual expenses and capital additions, as reported in PPL Electric’s annual FERC Form 1, filed under the FERC’s Uniform System of Accounts. Any difference between the revenue requirement in effect for the prior year and actual expenditures incurred for that year is recorded as a regulatory asset or regulatory liability. Any change in the prior year PPL zonal peak load billing factor applied on January 1st of each year, will result in an increase or decrease in revenue until the next annual rate update goes into effect on June 1st of that same year.

As a PLR, PPL Electric also purchases transmission services from PJM. See "PLR" below.
 
See Note 6 to the Financial Statements for additional information on rate mechanisms.
 
Distribution
 
PPL Electric's distribution base rates are calculated based on a return on rate base (net utility plant plus a cash working capital allowance less plant-related deferred taxes and other miscellaneous additions and deductions). All regulatory assets and liabilities are excluded from the return on rate base; therefore, no return is earned on the related assets unless specifically provided for by the PUC. Currently, PPL Electric's Smart Meter rider and the DSIC are the only riders authorized to earn a return. Certain operating expenses are also included in PPL Electric's distribution base rates including wages and benefits, other operation and maintenance expenses, depreciation and taxes.
 
Pennsylvania's Alternative Energy Portfolio Standard (AEPS) requires electricity distribution companies and electricity generation suppliers to obtain from alternative energy resources a portion of the electricity sold to retail customers in Pennsylvania. Under the default service procurement plans approved by the PUC, PPL Electric purchases all of the alternative energy generation supply it needs to comply with the AEPS.
 
Act 129 created an energy efficiency and conservation program, a demand side management program, smart metering technology requirements, new PLR generation supply procurement rules, remedies for market misconduct and changes to the existing AEPS.
 
Act 11 authorizes the PUC to approve two specific ratemaking mechanisms: the use of a fully projected future test year in base rate proceedings and, subject to certain conditions, the use of a DSIC. Such alternative ratemaking procedures and mechanisms provide opportunity for accelerated cost-recovery and, therefore, are important to PPL Electric as it is in a period of significant capital investment to maintain and enhance the reliability of its delivery system, including the replacement of aging assets. PPL Electric has utilized the fully projected future test year mechanism in theits 2015 base rate proceeding. PPL has had the ability to utilize the DSIC recovery mechanism since July 2013.
 
See "Regulatory Matters - Pennsylvania Activities" in Note 6 to the Financial Statements for additional information regarding Act 129 and other legislative and regulatory impacts.
 
PLR
 
The Customer Choice Act requires Electric Distribution Companies (EDCs), including PPL Electric, or an alternative supplier approved by the PUC to act as a PLR of electricity supply for customers who do not choose to shop for supply with a competitive supplier and provides that electricity supply costs will be recovered by the PLR pursuant to PUC regulations. In

Table of Contents

2016, 2017, the following average percentages of PPL Electric's customer load were provided by competitive suppliers: 49%46% of residential, 86%85% of small commercial and industrial and 99%98% of large commercial and industrial customers. The PUC continues to be interested infavor expanding the competitive market for electricity. See "Regulatory Matters - Pennsylvania Activities - Act 129" in Note 6 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
 
PPL Electric's cost of electricity generation is based on a competitive solicitation process. The PUC approved PPL Electric's default service plan for the period June 2015 through May 2017, which included 4 solicitations for electricity supply held semiannually in April and October. The PUC approved PPL Electric's default service plan for the period June 2017 through May 2021, which includes a total of 8 solicitations for electricity supply held semiannually in April and October. Pursuant to both the current and future plans, PPL Electric contracts for all of the electricity supply for residential customers and commercial and industrial customers who elect to take that service from PPL Electric. These solicitations include a mix of 6- and 12-month fixed-price load-following contracts for residential and small commercial and industrial customers, and 12-month12-


18


Table of Contents


month real-time pricing contracts for large commercial and industrial customers to fulfill PPL Electric's obligation to provide customer electricity supply as a PLR.
 
Numerous alternative suppliers have offered to provide generation supply in PPL Electric's service territory. Since the cost of generation supply is a pass-through cost for PPL Electric, its financial results are not impacted if its customers purchase electricity supply from these alternative suppliers.

TCJA Impact on PPL Electric Rates

The PUC issued a Secretarial Letter on February 12, 2018 regarding the TCJA. The Commission is requesting comments from interested parties addressing whether the Commission should adjust current customer rates to reflect the reduced federal income tax expense and, if so, the appropriate negative surcharge or other methodology that would permit immediate adjustment to consumer rates, and whether the surcharge or other said methodology should provide that any refunds to customers due to reduced taxes be effective as of January 1, 2018. In addition, the Secretarial Letter requests certain Pennsylvania regulated utilities, including PPL Electric, to provide certain data related to the effect of the TCJA on PPL Electric’s income tax expense and rate base including whether any of the potential tax savings from the reduced federal corporate tax rate can be used for purposes other than to reduce customer rates. PPL Electric’s responses are due to the PUC not later than March 9, 2018.

The FERC has not issued any guidance on the effect on rates of the TCJA.

(PPL)

Corporate and Other(PPL)

PPL Services provides PPL subsidiaries with administrative, management and support services. The costs of these services are charged directly to the respective recipients for the services provided or indirectly charged to applicable recipients based on an average of the recipients' relative invested capital, operation and maintenance expenses and number of employees.employees or a ratio of overall direct and indirect costs.

PPL Capital Funding, PPL's financing subsidiary, provides financing for the operations of PPL and certain subsidiaries. PPL's growth in rate-regulated businesses provides the organization with an enhanced corporate level financing alternative, through PPL Capital Funding, that enables PPL to cost effectively support targeted credit profiles across all of PPL's rated companies. As a result, PPL plans to utilize PPL Capital Funding as a source of capital in future financings, in addition to continued direct financing by the operating companies.
 
Unlike PPL Services, PPL Capital Funding's costs are not generally charged to PPL subsidiaries. Costs are charged directly to PPL. However, PPL Capital Funding participated significantly in the financing for the acquisitions of LKE and WPD Midlands and certain associated financing costs were allocated to the Kentucky Regulated and U.K. Regulated segments. The associated financing costs, as well as the financing costs associated with prior issuances of certain other PPL Capital Funding securities, have been assigned to the appropriate segments for purposes of PPL management's assessment of segment performance. The financing costs associated primarily with PPL Capital Funding's securities issuances beginning in 2013, with certain exceptions, have not been directly assigned or allocated to any segment.

Spinoff of PPL Energy Supply
In June 2014, PPL and PPL Energy Supply executed definitive agreements with affiliates of Riverstone to spin off PPL Energy Supply and immediately combine it with Riverstone's competitive power generation businesses to form a new, stand-alone, publicly traded company named Talen Energy. On April 29, 2015, PPL's Board of Directors declared the June 1, 2015 distribution to PPL's shareowners of record on May 20, 2015 of a newly formed entity, Holdco, which at closing owned all of the membership interests of PPL Energy Supply and all of the common stock of Talen Energy.
Immediately following the spinoff on June 1, 2015, Holdco merged with a special purpose subsidiary of Talen Energy, with Holdco continuing as the surviving company to the merger and as a wholly owned subsidiary of Talen Energy and the sole owner of PPL Energy Supply. Substantially contemporaneous with the spinoff and merger, RJS Power was contributed by its owners to become a subsidiary of Talen Energy. PPL's shareowners received approximately 0.1249 shares of Talen Energy common stock for each share of PPL common stock they owned on May 20, 2015. Following completion of these transactions, PPL shareowners owned 65% of Talen Energy and affiliates of Riverstone owned 35%. The spinoff had no effect on the


19


Table of Contents


number of PPL common shares owned by PPL shareowners or the number of shares of PPL common stock outstanding. The transaction is intended to be tax-free to PPL and its shareowners for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
PPL has no continuing ownership interest in or control of Talen Energy and Talen Energy Supply (formerly PPL Energy Supply).
See Note 8 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
 
(All Registrants)
 
SEASONALITY
 
The demand for and market prices of electricity and natural gas are affected by weather. As a result, the Registrants' operating results in the future may fluctuate substantially on a seasonal basis, especially when more severeunpredictable weather conditions such as heat waves or extreme winter weather make such fluctuations more pronounced. The pattern of this fluctuation may change depending on the type and location of the facilities owned. See "Environmental Matters" in Note 13 to the Financial Statements for additional information regarding climate change.
 
FINANCIAL CONDITION
 
See "Financial Condition" in "Item 7. Combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for this information.
 
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE REQUIREMENTS
 
See "Financial Condition - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Forecasted Uses of Cash - Capital Expenditures" in "Item 7. Combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for information

Table of Contents

concerning projected capital expenditure requirements for 20172018 through 2021.2022. See Note 13 to the Financial Statements for additional information concerning the potential impact on capital expenditures from environmental matters.

ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
 
The Registrants are subject to certain existing and developing federal, regional, state and local laws and regulations with respect to air and water quality, land use and other environmental matters. The EPA has issued numerous environmental regulations relating to air, water and waste that directly affect the electric power industry. See "Financial Condition - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Forecasted Uses of Cash - Capital Expenditures" in "Item 7. Combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for information on projected environmental capital expenditures for 20172018 through 2021.2022. Also, see "Environmental Matters" in Note 13 to the Financial Statements for additional information and Note 6 to the Financial Statements for information related to the recovery of environmental compliance costs.
 
EMPLOYEE RELATIONS
 
At December 31, 2016,2017, PPL and its subsidiaries had the following full-time employees and employees represented by labor unions.
Total Full-Time
Employees
 
Number of  Union
Employees
 
Percentage of Total
Workforce
Total Full-Time
Employees
 
Number of Union
Employees
 
Percentage of Total
Workforce
PPL 12,689
 6,274
 49%12,512
 6,113
 49%
PPL Electric1,837
 1,150
 63%1,755
 1,084
 62%
LKE3,507
 819
 23%3,470
 782
 23%
LG&E1,023
 696
 68%986
 660
 67%
KU919
 123
 13%910
 122
 13%
 
PPL's domestic workforce has 2,1732,001 employees, or 36%34%, that are members of labor unions. A three-year bargaining agreement with the IBEW labor union, which expires in May 2017, covers 1,150 PPL Electric employees and 204 other employees. LG&E has 696 employees and KU has 69 employees that are represented by an IBEW labor union. LG&E and KU have three-year labor agreements with the IBEW, which expire in November 2017 and August 2018. The KU IBEW agreement includes a wage reopener in 2017. KU has 54 employees that are represented by a United Steelworkers of America (USWA) labor union, under an agreement that expires in August 2017. 

WPD has 4,1014,112 employees who are members of labor unions (or 62% of PPL's U.K. workforce). WPD recognizes four unions, the largest of which represents 41%42% of its union workforce. WPD's Electricity Business Agreement, which covers 4,0354,047 union employees, may be amended by agreement between WPD and the unions and can be terminated with 12 months' notice by either side.


20


Table of Contents



CYBERSECURITY MANAGEMENT

The Registrants and their subsidiaries are subject to risks from cyber-attacks that have the potential to cause significant interruptions to the operation of their businesses. The frequency of these attempted intrusions has increased in recent years and the sources, motivations and techniques of attack continue to evolve and change rapidly. PPL has undertaken a variety of actions to monitor and address cyber-related risks. Cybersecurity and the effectiveness of PPL’s cybersecurity strategy are regular topics of discussion at Board and Audit Committee meetings. PPL's strategy for managing cyber-related risks is risk-based and, where appropriate, integrated within the company's enterprise risk management processes. PPL’s Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), who reports directly to the Chief Executive Officer, leads a dedicated cybersecurity team and is responsible for the design, implementation, and execution of cyber-risk management strategy. Among other things, the CISO and the cybersecurity team actively monitor the Registrants' systems, regularly review policies, compliance, regulations and best practices, perform penetration testing, lead response exercises and internal campaigns, and provide training and communication across the organization to strengthen secure behavior. The cybersecurity team also routinely participates in industry-wide programs to further information sharing, intelligence gathering, and unity of effort in responding to potential or actual attacks. In addition to these enterprise-wide initiatives, PPL’s Kentucky and Pennsylvania operations are subject to extensive and rigorous mandatory cybersecurity requirements that are developed and enforced by NERC and approved by FERC to protect grid security and reliability. Finally, PPL purchases insurance to protect against a wide range of costs that could be incurred in connection with cyber-related incidents. There can be no assurance, however, that these efforts will be effective to prevent interruption of services or other damage to the Registrants' businesses or operations or that PPL's insurance coverage will cover all costs incurred in connection with any cyber-related incident.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
 
PPL's Internet website is www.pplweb.com. Under the Investors heading of that website, PPL provides access to all SEC filings of the Registrants (including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(d) or 15(d)) free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after filing with the SEC. Additionally, the Registrants' filings are available at the SEC's website (www.sec.gov) and at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549, or by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.



21


Table of Contents


ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
 
The Registrants face various risks associated with their businesses. Our businesses, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations could be materially adversely affected by any of these risks. In addition, this report also contains forward-looking and other statements about our businesses that are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties. See "Forward-Looking Information," "Item 1. Business," "Item 7. Combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and Note 13 to the Financial Statements for more information concerning the risks described below and for other risks, uncertainties and factors that could impact our businesses and financial results.
 
As used in this Item 1A., the terms "we," "our" and "us" generally refer to PPL and its consolidated subsidiaries taken as a whole, or PPL Electric and its consolidated subsidiaries taken as a whole within the Pennsylvania Regulated segment discussion, or LKE and its consolidated subsidiaries taken as a whole within the Kentucky Regulated segment discussion.
 
(PPL)
 
Risks Relating to the Spinoff of PPL Energy Supply and Formation of Talen Energy Corporation
If the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply does not qualify as a tax-free distribution under Sections 355 and 368 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), including as a result of subsequent acquisitions of stock of PPL or Talen Energy, then PPL and/or its shareowners may be required to pay substantial U.S. federal income taxes.
Among other requirements, the completion of the June 1, 2015 spinoff of PPL Energy Supply and subsequent combination with RJS Power was conditioned upon PPL's receipt of a legal opinion of tax counsel to the effect that the spinoff will qualify as a reorganization pursuant to Section 368(a)(1)(D) and a tax-free distribution pursuant to Section 355 of the Code. Although receipt of such legal opinion was a condition to completion of the spinoff and subsequent combination, that legal opinion is not binding on the IRS. Accordingly, the IRS could reach conclusions that are different from those in the tax opinion. If, notwithstanding the receipt of such opinion, the IRS were to determine the distribution to be taxable (including as a result of the subsequent acquisition of Talen Energy by affiliates of Riverstone on December 6, 2016 (the "Talen Acquisition")), PPL would, and its shareowners could, depending on their individual circumstances, recognize a tax liability that could be substantial. In addition, notwithstanding the receipt of such opinion, if the IRS were to determine the merger to be taxable (including as a result of the Talen Acquisition), PPL shareowners may, depending on their individual circumstances, recognize a tax liability that could be material.
In addition, the spinoff would be taxable to PPL pursuant to Section 355(e) of the Code if there were a 50% or greater change in ownership (by vote or value) of either PPL or Talen Energy (including as a result of the Talen Acquisition), directly or indirectly, as part of a plan or series of related transactions that include the spinoff. Because PPL's shareowners collectively owned more than 50% of Talen Energy's common stock following the spinoff and combination with RJS Power, the combination alone would not cause the spinoff to be taxable to PPL under Section 355(e) of the Code. However, Section 355(e) of the Code might apply if acquisitions of stock of PPL before or after the spinoff, or of Talen Energy after the combination (including the Talen Acquisition), were considered to be part of a plan or series of related transactions that include the spinoff. PPL is not aware of any such plan or series of transactions that include the spinoff.

In connection with the closing of the Talen Acquisition, Talen Energy was required to deliver to PPL a legal opinion of tax counsel concluding that the Talen Acquisition would not affect the tax-free status of the spinoff. As described above, such legal opinion is not binding on the IRS, and accordingly, the IRS could reach conclusions that are different from those expressed in the legal opinion.
Risks related to our U.K. Segment
 
Our U.K. distribution business contributes a significant amount of PPL's earnings and exposes us to the following additional risks related to operating outside the U.S., including risks associated with changes in U.K. laws and regulations, taxes, economic conditions and political conditions and policies of the U.K. government and the European Union. These risks may adversely impact the results of operations of our U.K. distribution business or affect our ability to access U.K. revenues for payment of distributions or for other corporate purposes in the U.S.

changes in laws or regulations relating to U.K. operations, including rate regulations, operational performance and tax laws and regulations;
changes in government policies, personnel or approval requirements;
changes in general economic conditions affecting the U.K.;

Table of Contents

regulatory reviews of tariffs for distribution companies;DNOs, including the potential RIIO-EDI mid-period review currently being evaluated by Ofgem, with a decision as to whether to engage in such a review and the scope thereof to be announced in the spring of 2018;
changes in labor relations;
limitations on foreign investment or ownership of projects and returns or distributions to foreign investors;
limitations on the ability of foreign companies to borrow money from foreign lenders and lack of local capital or loans;
changes in U.S. tax law applicable to taxation of foreign earnings;
compliance with U.S. foreign corrupt practices laws; and
prolonged periods of low inflation or deflation.

PPL's earnings may be adversely affected as a result of the June 23, 2016 referendum inMarch 2017 formal notification by the U.K. of its intent to withdraw from the European Union.

Significant uncertainty existscontinues to exist concerning the effects of the June 23, 2016 referendum in favor ofMarch 2017 formal notification by the U.K. withdrawalof its intent to withdraw from the European Union, including the natureduration and durationoutcome of negotiations between the U.K. and European Union as to the terms of anythe withdrawal. PPL cannot predict the impact, in either the short-term or long-term, on foreign exchange rates or PPL’s long-term financial condition that may be experienced as a result of anythe actions that may be taken by the U.K. government to withdraw from the European Union, although such impacts could be significant.

We are subject to foreign currency exchange rate risks because a significant portion of our cash flows and reported earnings are currently generated by our U.K. business operations.
 
These risks relate primarily to changes in the relative value of the British pound sterling and the U.S. dollar between the time we initially invest U.S. dollars in our U.K. businesses, and our strategy to hedge against such changes, and the time that cash is repatriated to the U.S. from the U.K., including cash flows from our U.K. businesses that may be distributed to PPL or used for repayments of intercompany loans or other general corporate purposes. In addition, PPL's consolidated reported earnings on a GAAP basis may be subject to earnings translation risk, which is the result of the conversion of earnings as reported in our U.K. businesses on a British pound sterling basis to a U.S. dollar basis in accordance with GAAP requirements.
 


22


Table of Contents


Our U.K. segment is subject to inflationary risks.
 
Our U.K. distribution business is subject to the risks associated with fluctuations in RPI in the U.K., which is a measure of inflation.
 
In RIIO-ED1, WPD's base demand revenue was established by Ofgem inbased on 2012/13 prices. Base demand revenue is then increased bysubsequently adjusted to reflect any increase or decrease in RPI for each year to arrive atdetermine the amount of revenue WPD can collect in tariffs. The RPI is forecasted annually by HM Treasury and subject to true-up in subsequent years. TheConsequently, the fluctuations between forecasted and actual RPI can then result in variances in base demand revenue. WhileAlthough WPD also has debt that is indexed to RPI and certain components of operations and maintenance expense are affected by inflation, these may not offset changes in base demand revenue and timing of such offsets would likely affect differentnot be correlated precisely with the calendar years.year in which the variance in demand revenue was initially incurred. Further, as RAV is indexed to RPI under U.K. rate regulations, a reduction in RPI could adversely affect the debt/RAVa borrower's debt-to-RAV ratio, potentially limiting future borrowings at WPD's holding company.
 
Our U.K. delivery business is subject to revenue variability based on operational performance.
 
Our U.K. delivery businesses operate under an incentive-based regulatory framework. Managing operational risk and delivering agreed-upon performance are critical to the U.K. Regulated segment's financial performance. Disruption to these distribution networks could reduce profitability both directly by incurring costs for network restoration and also through the system of penalties and rewards that Ofgem administers relating to customer service levels.
 
A failure by any of our U.K. regulated businesses to comply with the terms of a distribution license may lead to the issuance of an enforcement order by Ofgem that could have an adverse impact on PPL.
 
Ofgem has powers to levy fines of up to ten percent of revenue for any breach of a distribution license or, in certain circumstances, such as insolvency, the distribution license itself may be revoked. Ofgem also has formal powers to propose modifications to each distribution license and there can be no assurance that a restrictive modification will not be introduced in the future, which could have an adverse effect on the operations and financial condition of the U.K. regulated businesses and PPL.
 
Risks Related to All Segments
(All Registrants)
The operation of our businesses is subject to cyber-based security and integrity risks.

Numerous functions affecting the efficient operation of our businesses are dependent on the secure and reliable storage, processing and communication of electronic data and the use of sophisticated computer hardware and software systems. The operation of our transmission and distribution operations, as well as our generation plants, are all reliant on cyber-based technologies and, therefore, subject to the risk that such systems could be the target of disruptive actions, principally by terrorists or criminals, or otherwise be compromised by unintentional events. As a result, operations could be interrupted, property could be damaged and sensitive customer information lost or stolen, causing us to incur significant losses of revenues, other substantial liabilities and damages, costs to replace or repair damaged equipment and damage to our reputation. In addition, under the Energy Policy Act of 2005, users, owners and operators of the bulk power transmission system, including PPL Electric, LG&E and KU, are subject to mandatory reliability standards promulgated by NERC and SERC and enforced by FERC. As the operator of natural gas distribution systems, LG&E is also subject to mandatory reliability standards of the U.S. Department of Transportation. Failure to comply with such standards could result in the imposition of fines or civil penalties, and potential exposure to third party claims for alleged violations of such standards.

We are subject to risks associated with federal and state tax laws and regulations.
Changes in tax law, including the recent enactment of the TCJA, as well as the inherent difficulty in quantifying potential tax effects of business decisions could negatively impact our results of operations. We are required to make judgments in order to estimate our obligations to taxing authorities. These tax obligations include income, property, gross receipts, franchise, sales and use, employment-related and other taxes. We also estimate our ability to utilize tax benefits and tax credits. Due to the revenue needs of the jurisdictions in which our businesses operate, various tax and fee increases may be proposed or considered. We cannot predict changes in tax law or regulation or the effect of any such changes on our businesses. Any such changes could increase tax expense and could have a significant negative impact on our results of operations and cash flows.


23


Table of Contents


The TCJA had a significant impact on our 2017 financial statements and expected future operating cash flows. We have completed or made reasonable estimates of the effects of the TCJA reflected in our December 31, 2017 financial statements, but we continue to evaluate the application of various components of the law in the calculation of income tax expense.

Increases in electricity prices and/or a weak economy, can lead to changes in legislative and regulatory policy, including the promotion of energy efficiency, conservation and distributed generation or self-generation, which may adversely impact our business.
Energy consumption is significantly impacted by overall levels of economic activity and costs of energy supplies. Economic downturns or periods of high energy supply costs can lead to changes in or the development of legislative and regulatory policy designed to promote reductions in energy consumption and increased energy efficiency, alternative and renewable energy sources, and distributed or self-generation by customers. This focus on conservation, energy efficiency and self-generation may result in a decline in electricity demand, which could adversely affect our business.

We could be negatively affected by rising interest rates, downgrades to our credit ratings, adverse credit market conditions or other negative developments in our ability to access capital markets.
In the ordinary course of business, we are reliant upon adequate long-term and short-term financing to fund our significant capital expenditures, debt service and operating needs. As a capital-intensive business, we are sensitive to developments in interest rates, credit rating considerations, insurance, security or collateral requirements, market liquidity and credit availability and refinancing opportunities necessary or advisable to respond to credit market changes. Changes in these conditions could result in increased costs and decreased availability of credit.
A downgrade in our credit ratings could negatively affect our ability to access capital and increase the cost of maintaining our credit facilities and any new debt.
Credit ratings assigned by Moody's and S&P to our businesses and their financial obligations have a significant impact on the cost of capital incurred by our businesses. A ratings downgrade could increase our short-term borrowing costs and negatively affect our ability to fund liquidity needs and access new long-term debt at acceptable interest rates. See "Item 7. Combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Financial Condition - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Ratings Triggers" for additional information on the financial impact of a downgrade in our credit ratings.
Our operating revenues could fluctuate on a seasonal basis, especially as a result of extreme weather conditions.
Our businesses are subject to seasonal demand cycles. For example, in some markets demand for, and market prices of, electricity peak during hot summer months, while in other markets such peaks occur in cold winter months. As a result, our overall operating results may fluctuate substantially on a seasonal basis if weather conditions diverge adversely from seasonal norms.
Operating expenses could be affected by weather conditions, including storms, as well as by significant man-made or accidentaldisturbances, including terrorism or natural disasters.
Weather and these other factors can significantly affect our profitability or operations by causing outages, damaging infrastructure and requiring significant repair costs. Storm outages and damage often directly decrease revenues and increase expenses, due to reduced usage and restoration costs.
Our businesses are subject to physical, market and economic risks relating to potentialeffects of climate change.
Climate change may produce changes in weather or other environmental conditions, including temperature or precipitation levels, and thus may impact consumer demand for electricity. In addition, the potential physical effects of climate change, such as increased frequency and severity of storms, floods, and other climatic events, could disrupt our operations and cause us to incur significant costs to prepare for or respond to these effects. These or other meteorological changes could lead to increased operating costs, capital expenses or power purchase costs. Greenhouse gas regulation could increase the cost of electricity, particularly power generated by fossil fuels, and such increases could have a depressive effect on regional economies. Reduced economic and consumer activity in our service areas -- both generally and specific to certain industries and consumers accustomed to previously lower cost power -- could reduce demand for the power we generate, market and deliver. Also, demand for our energy-related services could be similarly lowered by consumers' preferences or market factors favoring energy efficiency, low-carbon power sources or reduced electricity usage.


24


Table of Contents


We cannot predict the outcome of the legal proceedings and investigations currently being conducted with respect to our current and past business activities. An adverse determination could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
We are involved in legal proceedings, claims and litigation and subject to ongoing state and federal investigations arising out of our business operations, the most significant of which are summarized in "Federal Matters" in Note 6 to the Financial Statements and "Legal Matters," "Regulatory Issues" and "Environmental Matters" in Note 13 to the Financial Statements. We cannot predict the ultimate outcome of these matters, nor can we reasonably estimate the costs or liabilities that could potentially result from a negative outcome in each case.
Significant increases in our operation and maintenance expenses, including health care and pension costs, could adversely affect our future earnings and liquidity.
We continually focus on limiting and reducing our operation and maintenance expenses. However, we expect to continue to face increased cost pressures in our operations. Increased costs of materials and labor may result from general inflation, increased regulatory requirements (especially in respect of environmental regulations), the need for higher-cost expertise in the workforce or other factors. In addition, pursuant to collective bargaining agreements, we are contractually committed to provide specified levels of health care and pension benefits to certain current employees and retirees. These benefits give rise to significant expenses. Due to general inflation with respect to such costs, the aging demographics of our workforce and other factors, we have experienced significant health care cost inflation in recent years, and we expect our health care costs, including prescription drug coverage, to continue to increase despite measures that we have taken and expect to take to require employees and retirees to bear a higher portion of the costs of their health care benefits. In addition, we expect to continue to incur significant costs with respect to the defined benefit pension plans for our employees and retirees. The measurement of our expected future health care and pension obligations, costs and liabilities is highly dependent on a variety of assumptions, most of which relate to factors beyond our control. These assumptions include investment returns, interest rates, health care cost trends, inflation rates, benefit improvements, salary increases and the demographics of plan participants. If our assumptions prove to be inaccurate, our future costs and cash contribution requirements to fund these benefits could increase significantly.
We may incur liabilities in connection with discontinued operations.
In connection with various divestitures, and certain other transactions, we have indemnified or guaranteed parties against certain liabilities. These indemnities and guarantees relate, among other things, to liabilities which may arise with respect to the period during which we or our subsidiaries operated a divested business, and to certain ongoing contractual relationships and entitlements with respect to which we or our subsidiaries made commitments in connection with the divestiture. See "Guarantees and Other Assurances" in Note 13 to the Financial Statements.

We are subject to liability risks relating to our generation,transmission and distribution operations.
The conduct of our physical and commercial operations subjects us to many risks, including risks of potential physical injury, property damage or other financial liability, caused to or by employees, customers, contractors, vendors, contractual or financial counterparties and other third parties.
Our facilities may not operate as planned, which may increase our expenses and decrease our revenues and have an adverse effect on our financial performance.
Operation of power plants, transmission and distribution facilities, information technology systems and other assets and activities subjects us to a variety of risks, including the breakdown or failure of equipment, accidents, security breaches, viruses or outages affecting information technology systems, labor disputes, obsolescence, delivery/transportation problems and disruptions of fuel supply and performance below expected levels. These events may impact our ability to conduct our businesses efficiently and lead to increased costs, expenses or losses. Operation of our delivery systems below our expectations may result in lost revenue and increased expense, including higher maintenance costs, which may not be recoverable from customers. Planned and unplanned outages at our power plants may require us to purchase power at then-current market prices to satisfy our commitments or, in the alternative, pay penalties and damages for failure to satisfy them.
Although we maintain customary insurance coverage for certain of these risks, no assurance can be given that such insurance coverage will be sufficient to compensate us in the event losses occur.



25


Table of Contents


We are required to obtain, and to comply with, government permits and approvals.
We are required to obtain, and to comply with, numerous permits, approvals, licenses and certificates from governmental agencies. The process of obtaining and renewing necessary permits can be lengthy and complex and can sometimes result in the establishment of permit conditions that make the project or activity for which the permit was sought unprofitable or otherwise unattractive. In addition, such permits or approvals may be subject to denial, revocation or modification under various circumstances. Failure to obtain or comply with the conditions of permits or approvals, or failure to comply with any applicable laws or regulations, may result in the delay or temporary suspension of our operations and electricity sales or the curtailment of our power delivery and may subject us to penalties and other sanctions. Although various regulators routinely renew existing licenses, renewal could be denied or jeopardized by various factors, including failure to provide adequate financial assurance for closure; failure to comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations or permit conditions; local community, political or other opposition; and executive, legislative or regulatory action.
Our cost or inability to obtain and comply with the permits and approvals required for our operations could have a material adverse effect on our operations and cash flows. In addition, new environmental legislation or regulations, if enacted, or changed interpretations of existing laws may elicit claims that historical routine modification activities at our facilities violated applicable laws and regulations. In addition to the possible imposition of fines in such cases, we may be required to undertake significant capital investments in pollution control technology and obtain additional operating permits or approvals, which could have an adverse impact on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
War, other armed conflicts or terrorist attacks could have a material adverse effect on our business.
War, terrorist attacks and unrest have caused and may continue to cause instability in the world's financial and commercial markets and have contributed to high levels of volatility in prices for oil and gas. In addition, unrest in the Middle East could lead to acts of terrorism in the United States, the United Kingdom or elsewhere, and acts of terrorism could be directed against companies such as ours. Armed conflicts and terrorism and their effects on us or our markets may significantly affect our business and results of operations in the future. In addition, we may incur increased costs for security, including additional physical plant security and security personnel or additional capability following a terrorist incident.
We are subject to counterparty performance, credit or other risk in their provision of goods or services to us, which could adversely affect our ability to operate our facilities or conduct business activities.
We purchase from a variety of suppliers energy, capacity, fuel, natural gas, transmission service and certain commodities used in the physical operation of our businesses, as well as goods or services, including information technology rights and services, used in the administration of our businesses. Delivery of these goods and services is dependent on the continuing operational performance and financial viability of our contractual counterparties and also the markets, infrastructure or third-parties they use to provide such goods and services to us. As a result, we are subject to the risks of disruptions, curtailments or increased costs in the operation of our businesses if such goods or services are unavailable or become subject to price spikes or if a counterparty fails to perform. Such disruptions could adversely affect our ability to operate our facilities or deliver our services and collect our revenues, which could result in lower sales and/or higher costs and thereby adversely affect our results of operations. The performance of coal markets and producers may be the subject of increased counterparty risk to LKE, LG&E and KU currently due to weaknesses in such markets and suppliers. The coal industry is subject to increasing competitive pressures from natural gas markets and new or more stringent environmental regulation, including greenhouse gases or other air emissions, combustion byproducts and water inputs or discharges. Consequently, the coal industry faces increased production costs or closed customer markets.

We are subject to the risk that our workforce and its knowledge base may become depleted in coming years.
We are experiencing an increase in attrition due primarily to the number of retiring employees, with the risk that critical knowledge will be lost and that it may be difficult to replace departed personnel, and to attract and retain new personnel, with appropriate skills and experience, due to a declining trend in the number of available skilled workers and an increase in competition for such workers.



26


Table of Contents



(PPL and LKE)
 
Risk Related to Registrant Holding Companies

Table of Contents

 
PPL and LKE are holding companies and their cash flows and ability to meet their obligations with respect to indebtedness and under guarantees, and PPL's ability to pay dividends, largely depends on the financial performance of their respective subsidiaries and, as a result, is effectively subordinated to all existing and future liabilities of those subsidiaries.
 
PPL and LKE are holding companies and conduct their operations primarily through subsidiaries. Substantially all of the consolidated assets of these Registrants are held by their subsidiaries. Accordingly, these Registrants' cash flows and ability to meet debt and guaranty obligations, as well as PPL's ability to pay dividends, are largely dependent upon the earnings of those subsidiaries and the distribution or other payment of such earnings in the form of dividends, distributions, loans, advances or repayment of loans and advances. The subsidiaries are separate legal entities and have no obligation to pay dividends or distributions to their parents or to make funds available for such a payment. The ability of the Registrants' subsidiaries to pay dividends or distributions in the future will depend on the subsidiaries' future earnings and cash flows and the needs of their businesses, and may be restricted by their obligations to holders of their outstanding debt and other creditors, as well as any contractual or legal restrictions in effect at such time, including the requirements of state corporate law applicable to payment of dividends and distributions, and regulatory requirements, including restrictions on the ability of PPL Electric, LG&E and KU to pay dividends under Section 305(a) of the Federal Power Act.
 
Because PPL and LKE are holding companies, their debt and guaranty obligations are effectively subordinated to all existing and future liabilities of their subsidiaries. Although certain agreements to which certain subsidiaries are parties limit their ability to incur additional indebtedness, PPL and LKE and their subsidiaries retain the ability to incur substantial additional indebtedness and other liabilities. Therefore, PPL's and LKE's rights and the rights of their creditors, including rights of debt holders, to participate in the assets of any of their subsidiaries, in the event that such a subsidiary is liquidated or reorganized, will be subject to the prior claims of such subsidiary's creditors. In addition, if PPL elects to receive distributions of earnings from its foreign operations, PPL may incur U.S. income taxes, net of any available foreign tax credits, on such amounts.
 
(PPL Electric, LG&E and KU)
 
Risks Related to Domestic Regulated Utility Operations
 
Our domestic regulated utility businesses face many of the same risks, in addition to those risks that are unique to each of the Kentucky Regulated segment and the Pennsylvania Regulated segment. Set forth below are risk factors common to both domestic regulated segments, followed by sections identifying separately the risks specific to each of these segments.
 
The operation of our businesses is subject to cyber-based security and integrity risks.
Numerous functions affecting the efficient operation of our businesses are dependent on the secure and reliable storage, processing and communication of electronic data and the use of sophisticated computer hardware and software systems. The operation of our transmission and distribution operations, as well as our generation plants, are all reliant on cyber-based technologies and, therefore, subject to the risk that such systems could be the target of disruptive actions, principally by terrorists or vandals, or otherwise be compromised by unintentional events. As a result, operations could be interrupted, property could be damaged and sensitive customer information lost or stolen, causing us to incur significant losses of revenues, other substantial liabilities and damages, costs to replace or repair damaged equipment and damage to our reputation.
Our profitability is highly dependent on our ability to recover the costs of providing energy and utility services to our customers and earn an adequate return on our capital investments. Regulators may not approve the rates we request and existing rates may be challenged.
 
The rates we charge our utility customers must be approved by one or more federal or state regulatory commissions, including the FERC, KPSC, VSCC and PUC. Although rate regulation is generally premised on the recovery of prudently incurred costs and a reasonable rate of return on invested capital, there can be no assurance that regulatory authorities will consider all of our costs to have been prudently incurred or that the regulatory process by which rates are determined will always result in rates that achieve full or timely recovery of our costs or an adequate return on our capital investments. Federal or state agencies, intervenors and other permitted parties may challenge our current or future rate requests, structures or mechanisms, and ultimately reduce, alter or limit the rates we receive. Although our rates are generally regulated based on an analysis of our costs incurred in a base year or on future projected costs, the rates we are allowed to charge may or may not match our costs at any given time. Our domestic regulated utility businesses are subject to substantial capital expenditure requirements over the next several years, which will likely require rate increase requests to the regulators. If our costs are not adequately recovered through rates, it could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
 

Table of Contents

Our domestic utility businesses are subject to significant and complex governmental regulation.
 
In addition to regulating the rates we charge, various federal and state regulatory authorities regulate many aspects of our domestic utility operations, including:
 
the terms and conditions of our service and operations;


27


Table of Contents


financial and capital structure matters;
siting, construction and operation of facilities;
mandatory reliability and safety standards under the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and other standards of conduct;
accounting, depreciation and cost allocation methodologies;
tax matters;
affiliate transactions;
acquisition and disposal of utility assets and issuance of securities; and
various other matters, including energy efficiency.

Such regulations or changes thereto may subject us to higher operating costs or increased capital expenditures and failure to comply could result in sanctions or possible penalties which may not be recoverable from customers.
 
Our domestic regulated businesses undertake significant capital projects and these activities are subject to unforeseen costs, delays or failures, as well as risk of inadequate recovery of resulting costs.
 
The domestic regulated utility businesses are capital intensive and require significant investments in energy generation (in the case of LG&E and KU) and transmission, distribution and other infrastructure projects, such as projects for environmental compliance and system reliability. The completion of these projects without delays or cost overruns is subject to risks in many areas, including:
 
approval, licensing and permitting;
land acquisition and the availability of suitable land;
skilled labor or equipment shortages;
construction problems or delays, including disputes with third-party intervenors;
increases in commodity prices or labor rates; and
contractor performance;performance.

Failure to complete our capital projects on schedule or on budget, or at all, could adversely affect our financial performance, operations and future growth if such expenditures are not granted rate recovery by our regulators.
We are subject to the risk that our workforce and its knowledge base may become depleted in coming years.
We are experiencing an increase in attrition due primarily to the number of retiring employees, with the risk that critical knowledge will be lost and that it may be difficult to replace departed personnel, and to attract and retain new personnel, due to a declining trend in the number of available skilled workers and an increase in competition for such workers.
 
We are or may be subject to costs of remediation of environmental contamination at facilities owned or operated by our former subsidiaries.
 
We may be subject to liability for the costs of environmental remediation of property now or formerly owned by us with respect to substances that we may have generated regardless of whether the liabilities arose before, during or after the time we owned or operated the facilities. We also have current or previous ownership interests in sites associated with the production of manufactured gas for which we may be liable for additional costs related to investigation, remediation and monitoring of these sites. Remediation activities associated with our former manufactured gas plant operations are one source of such costs. Citizen groups or others may bring litigation regarding environmental issues including claims of various types, such as property damage, personal injury and citizen challenges to compliance decisions on the enforcement of environmental requirements, which could subject us to penalties, injunctive relief and the cost of litigation. We cannot predict the amount and timing of all future expenditures (including the potential or magnitude of fines or penalties) related to such environmental matters, although they could be material.

Risks Specific to Kentucky Regulated Segment
 

Table of Contents

(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
 
The costs of compliance with, and liabilities under, environmental laws are significant and are subject to continuing changes.
 
Extensive federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations are applicable to LG&E's and KU's generation business, including its air emissions, water discharges and the management of hazardous and solid wastes, among other business-related activities, and the costs of compliance or alleged non-compliance cannot be predicted but could be material. In addition, our costs may increase significantly if the requirements or scope of environmental laws, regulations or similar rules are expanded or changed. Costs may take the form of increased capital expenditures or operating and maintenance expenses, monetary fines, penalties or forfeitures, operational changes, permit limitations or other restrictions. At some of our older generating facilities it may be uneconomic for us to install necessary pollution control equipment, which could cause us to retire those units. Market prices for energy and capacity also affect this cost-effectiveness analysis. Many of these environmental law considerations are


28


Table of Contents


also applicable to the operations of our key suppliers or customers, such as coal producers and industrial power users, and may impact the costs of their products and demand for our services.
 
Ongoing changes in environmental regulations or their implementation requirements and our related compliance strategies entail a number of uncertainties.
 
The environmental standards governing LG&E's and KU's businesses, particularly as applicable to coal-fired generation and related activities, continue to be subject to uncertainties due to rulemaking and other regulatory developments, legislative activities and litigation, administrative or permit challenges. Revisions to applicable standards, changes in compliance deadlines and invalidation of rules on appeal may require major changes in compliance strategies, operations or assets and adjustments to prior plans. Depending on the extent, frequency and timing of such changes, the companies may be subject to inconsistent requirements under multiple regulatory programs, compressed windows for decision-making and short compliance deadlines that may require new technologies or aggressive schedules for construction, permitting and other regulatory approvals. Under such circumstances, the companies may face higher risks of unsuccessful implementation of environmental-related business plans, noncompliance with applicable environmental rules, delayed or incomplete rate recovery or increased costs of implementation.
 
We are subject to operational, regulatory and other risks regarding certain significant developments in environmental regulation affecting coal-fired generation facilities.
 
Certain regulatory initiatives have been implemented or are under development which could represent significant developments or changes in environmental regulation and compliance costs or risk associated with the combustion of coal as occurs at LG&E's and KU's coal-fired generation facilities. In particular, such developments include the federal Clean Power Plan regulations governing greenhouse gas emissions at existing or new generation facilities, the federal Coal Combustion Residuals regulations governing coal by-product storage activities and the federal Effluent Limitations Guidelines governing water discharge activities. Such initiatives have the potential to require significant changes in generation portfolio composition and in coal combustion byproduct handling and disposal or water treatment and release facilities and methods from those historically used or currently available. Consequently, such developments may involve increased risks relating to the uncertain cost, efficacy and reliability of new technologies, equipment or methods. Compliance with such regulations could result in significant changes to LG&E's and KU's operations or commercial practices and material additional capital or operating expenditures. Such circumstances could also involve higher risks of compliance violations or of variations in rate or regulatory treatment when compared to existing frameworks.
 
Risks Specific to Pennsylvania Regulated Segment
 
(PPL and PPL Electric)
 
We plan to selectively pursue growth of our transmission capacity, which involves a number of uncertainties and may not achieve the desired financial results.
 
We plan to pursue expansion of our transmission capacity over the next several years. We plan to do this through the potential construction or acquisition of transmission projects and capital investments to upgrade transmission infrastructure. These types of projects involve numerous risks. With respect to the construction or acquisition of transmission projects, we may be required to expend significant sums for preliminary engineering, permitting, resource exploration, legal and other expenses before it can be established whether a project is feasible, economically attractive or capable of being financed. Expansion in our regulated businesses is dependent on future load or service requirements and subject to applicable regulatory processes. The success of

Table of Contents

both a new or acquired project would likely be contingent, among other things, upon the negotiation of satisfactory construction contracts, obtaining acceptable financing and maintaining acceptable credit ratings, as well as receipt of required and appropriate governmental approvals. If we were unable to complete construction or expansion of a project, we may not be able to recover our investment in the project.
 
We face competition for transmission projects, which could adversely affect our rate base growth.
 
FERC Order 1000, issued in July 2011, establishes certain procedural and substantive requirements relating to participation, cost allocation and non-incumbent developer aspects of regional and inter-regional electric transmission planning activities. The PPL Electric transmission business, operating under a FERC-approved PJM Open Access Transmission Tariff, is subject to competition pursuant to FERC Order 1000 from entities that are not incumbent PJM transmission owners with respect to the construction and ownership of transmission facilities within PJM. Increased competition can result in lower rate base growth.
 


29


Table of Contents


We could be subject to higher costs and/or penalties related to Pennsylvania Conservation and Energy Efficiency Programs.
 
PPL Electric is subject to Act 129 which contains requirements for energy efficiency and conservation programs and for the use of smart metering technology, imposes PLR electricity supply procurement rules, provides remedies for market misconduct, and made changes to the existing Alternative Energy Portfolio Standard. The law also requires electric utilities to meet specified goals for reduction in customer electricity usage and peak demand. Utilities not meeting these Act 129 requirements are subject to significant penalties that cannot be recovered in rates. Numerous factors outside of our control could prevent compliance with these requirements and result in penalties to us.

Other

(PPL)

Risks RelatedRelating to All Segmentsthe Spinoff of PPL Energy Supply and Formation of Talen Energy Corporation
 
(All Registrants)
Increases in electricity prices and/orIf the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply does not qualify as a weak economy, can lead to changes in legislativetax-free distribution under Sections 355 and regulatory policy,368 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), including the promotion of energy efficiency, conservation and distributed generation or self-generation, which may adversely impact our business.
Energy consumption is significantly impacted by overall levels of economic activity and costs of energy supplies. Economic downturns or periods of high energy supply costs can lead to changes in or the development of legislative and regulatory policy designed to promote reductions in energy consumption and increased energy efficiency, alternative and renewable energy sources, and distributed or self-generation by customers. This focus on conservation, energy efficiency and self-generation may result in a decline in electricity demand, which could adversely affect our business.
We could be negatively affected by rising interest rates, downgrades to our credit ratings, adverse credit market conditions or other negative developments in our ability to access capital markets.
In the ordinary course of business, we are reliant upon adequate long-term and short-term financing to fund our significant capital expenditures, debt service and operating needs. As a capital-intensive business, we are sensitive to developments in interest rates, credit rating considerations, insurance, security or collateral requirements, market liquidity and credit availability and refinancing opportunities necessary or advisable to respond to credit market changes. Changes in these conditions could result in increased costs and decreased availability of credit.
A downgrade in our credit ratings could negatively affect our ability to access capital and increase the cost of maintaining our credit facilities and any new debt.
Credit ratings assigned by Moody's and S&P to our businesses and their financial obligations have a significant impact on the cost of capital incurred by our businesses. A ratings downgrade could increase our short-term borrowing costs and negatively affect our ability to fund liquidity needs and access new long-term debt at acceptable interest rates. See "Item 7. Combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Financial Condition - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Ratings Triggers" for additional information on the financial impact of a downgrade in our credit ratings.
Our operating revenues could fluctuate on a seasonal basis, especially as a result of extreme weather conditions.subsequent acquisitions of stock of PPL or Talen Energy, then PPL and/or its shareowners may be required to pay substantial U.S. federal income taxes.
 
Our businessesAmong other requirements, the completion of the June 1, 2015 spinoff of PPL Energy Supply and subsequent combination with RJS Power was conditioned upon PPL's receipt of a legal opinion of tax counsel to the effect that the spinoff will qualify as a reorganization pursuant to Section 368(a)(1)(D) and a tax-free distribution pursuant to Section 355 of the Code. Although receipt of such legal opinion was a condition to completion of the spinoff and subsequent combination, that legal opinion is not binding on the IRS. Accordingly, the IRS could reach conclusions that are subjectdifferent from those in the tax opinion. If, notwithstanding the receipt of such opinion, the IRS were to seasonal demand cycles. For example, in some markets demand for, and market prices of, electricity peak during hot summer months, while in other markets such peaks occur in cold winter months. Asdetermine the distribution to be taxable (including as a result our overall operating results may fluctuate substantiallyof the subsequent acquisition of Talen Energy by affiliates of Riverstone on a seasonal basis if weather conditions such as heat waves, extreme cold,

Table of Contents

unseasonably mild weather or severe storms occur. The patterns of these fluctuations may changeDecember 6, 2016 (the "Talen Acquisition")), PPL would, and its shareowners could, depending on their individual circumstances, recognize a tax liability that could be substantial. In addition, notwithstanding the type and locationreceipt of our facilities.such opinion, if the IRS were to determine the merger to be taxable (including as a result of the Talen Acquisition), PPL shareowners may, depending on their individual circumstances, recognize a tax liability that could be material.
 
Operating expenses could be affected by weather conditions, including storms, as well as by significant man-made or accidentaldisturbances, including terrorism or natural disasters.
Weather and these other factors can significantly affect our profitability or operations by causing outages, damaging infrastructure and requiring significant repair costs. Storm outages and damage often directly decrease revenues and increase expenses, due to reduced usage and restoration costs.
Our businesses are subject to physical, market and economic risks relating to potentialeffects of climate change.
Climate change may produce changes in weather or other environmental conditions, including temperature or precipitation levels, and thus may impact consumer demand for electricity. In addition, the potential physical effects of climate change, such as increased frequency and severity of storms, floods, and other climatic events, could disrupt our operations and cause usspinoff would be taxable to incur significant costsPPL pursuant to prepare for or respond to these effects. These or other meteorological changes could lead to increased operating costs, capital expenses or power purchase costs. Greenhouse gas regulation could increase the cost of electricity, particularly power generated by fossil fuels, and such increases could have a depressive effect on regional economies. Reduced economic and consumer activity in our service areas -- both generally and specific to certain industries and consumers accustomed to previously lower cost power -- could reduce demand for the power we generate, market and deliver. Also, demand for our energy-related services could be similarly lowered by consumers' preferences or market factors favoring energy efficiency, low-carbon power sources or reduced electricity usage.
We cannot predict the outcomeSection 355(e) of the legal proceedings and investigations currently being conducted with respect to our current and past business activities. An adverse determination could haveCode if there were a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results50% or greater change in ownership (by vote or value) of operationseither PPL or cash flows.
We are involved in legal proceedings, claims and litigation and subject to ongoing state and federal investigations arising out of our business operations, the most significant of which are summarized in "Federal Matters" in Note 6 and "Legal Matters," "Regulatory Issues" and "Environmental Matters - Domestic" in Note 13 to the Financial Statements. We cannot predict the ultimate outcome of these matters, nor can we reasonably estimate the costs or liabilities that could potentiallyTalen Energy (including as a result from a negative outcome in each case.
Significant increases in our operation and maintenance expenses, including health care and pension costs, could adversely affect our future earnings and liquidity.
We continually focus on limiting and reducing our operation and maintenance expenses. However, we expect to continue to face increased cost pressures in our operations. Increased costs of materials and labor may result from general inflation, increased regulatory requirements (especially in respect of environmental regulations), the need for higher-cost expertise in the workforce or other factors. In addition, pursuant to collective bargaining agreements, we are contractually committed to provide specified levels of health care and pension benefits to certain current employees and retirees. These benefits give rise to significant expenses. Due to general inflation with respect to such costs, the aging demographics of our workforce and other factors, we have experienced significant health care cost inflation in recent years, and we expect our health care costs, including prescription drug coverage, to continue to increase despite measures that we have taken and expect to take to require employees and retirees to bear a higher portion of the costsTalen Acquisition), directly or indirectly, as part of their health care benefits. In addition, we expect to continue to incur significant costsa plan or series of related transactions that include the spinoff. Because PPL's shareowners collectively owned more than 50% of Talen Energy's common stock following the spinoff and combination with respect toRJS Power, the defined benefit pension plans for our employees and retirees. The measurement of our expected future health care and pension obligations, costs and liabilities is highly dependent on a variety of assumptions, most of which relate to factors beyond our control. These assumptions include investment returns, interest rates, health care cost trends, inflation rates, benefit improvements, salary increases andcombination alone would not cause the demographics of plan participants. If our assumptions provespinoff to be inaccurate, our future costs and cash contribution requirementstaxable to fund these benefits could increase significantly.PPL under Section 355(e) of the Code. However, Section 355(e) of the Code might apply if acquisitions of stock of PPL before or after the spinoff, or of Talen Energy after the combination (including the Talen Acquisition), were considered to be part of a plan or series of related transactions that include the spinoff. PPL is not aware of any such plan or series of transactions that include the spinoff.
We may incur liabilities in connection with discontinued operations.

In connection with various divestitures,the closing of the Talen Acquisition, Talen Energy was required to deliver to PPL a legal opinion of tax counsel concluding that the Talen Acquisition would not affect the tax-free status of the spinoff. As described above, such legal opinion is not binding on the IRS, and certain other transactions, we have indemnified or guaranteed parties against certain liabilities. These indemnities and guarantees relate, among other things, to liabilities which may arise with respect toaccordingly, the period during which we or our subsidiaries operated a divested business, and to certain ongoing contractual relationships and entitlements with respect to which we or our subsidiaries made commitments in connection with the divestiture. See "Guarantees and Other Assurances" in Note 13 to the Financial Statements.


Table of Contents

WeIRS could reach conclusions that are subject to liability risks relating to our generation,transmission and distribution operations.
The conduct of our physical and commercial operations subjects us to many risks, including risks of potential physical injury, property damage or other financial liability, caused to or by employees, customers, contractors, vendors, contractual or financial counterparties and other third parties.
Our facilities may not operate as planned, which may increase our expenses and decrease our revenues and have an adverse effect on our financial performance.
Operation of power plants, transmission and distribution facilities, information technology systems and other assets and activities subjects us to a variety of risks, including the breakdown or failure of equipment, accidents, security breaches, viruses or outages affecting information technology systems, labor disputes, obsolescence, delivery/transportation problems and disruptions of fuel supply and performance below expected levels. These events may impact our ability to conduct our businesses efficiently and lead to increased costs, expenses or losses. Operation of our delivery systems below our expectations may result in lost revenue and increased expense, including higher maintenance costs, which may not be recoverabledifferent from customers. Planned and unplanned outages at our power plants may require us to purchase power at then-current market prices to satisfy our commitments or,those expressed in the alternative, pay penalties and damages for failure to satisfy them.
Although we maintain customary insurance coverage for certain of these risks, no assurance can be given that such insurance coverage will be sufficient to compensate us in the event losses occur.
We are subject to risks associated with federal and state tax laws and regulations.
Changes in tax law as well as the inherent difficulty in quantifying potential tax effects of business decisions could negatively impact our results of operations. We are required to make judgments in order to estimate our obligations to taxing authorities. These tax obligations include income, property, gross receipts and franchise, sales and use, employment-related and other taxes. We also estimate our ability to utilize tax benefits and tax credits. Due to the revenue needs of the jurisdictions in which our businesses operate, various tax and fee increases may be proposed or considered. We cannot predict whether such tax legislation or regulation will be introduced or enacted or the effect of any such changes on our businesses. If enacted, any changes could increase tax expense and could have a significant negative impact on our results of operations and cash flows.
We are required to obtain, and to comply with, government permits and approvals.
We are required to obtain, and to comply with, numerous permits, approvals, licenses and certificates from governmental agencies. The process of obtaining and renewing necessary permits can be lengthy and complex and can sometimes result in the establishment of permit conditions that make the project or activity for which the permit was sought unprofitable or otherwise unattractive. In addition, such permits or approvals may be subject to denial, revocation or modification under various circumstances. Failure to obtain or comply with the conditions of permits or approvals, or failure to comply with any applicable laws or regulations, may result in the delay or temporary suspension of our operations and electricity sales or the curtailment of our power delivery and may subject us to penalties and other sanctions. Although various regulators routinely renew existing licenses, renewal could be denied or jeopardized by various factors, including failure to provide adequate financial assurance for closure; failure to comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations or permit conditions; local community, political or other opposition; and executive, legislative or regulatory action.
Our cost or inability to obtain and comply with the permits and approvals required for our operations could have a material adverse effect on our operations and cash flows. In addition, new environmental legislation or regulations, if enacted, or changed interpretations of existing laws may elicit claims that historical routine modification activities at our facilities violated applicable laws and regulations. In addition to the possible imposition of fines in such cases, we may be required to undertake significant capital investments in pollution control technology and obtain additional operating permits or approvals, which could have an adverse impact on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
War, other armed conflicts or terrorist attacks could have a material adverse effect on our business.
War, terrorist attacks and unrest have caused and may continue to cause instability in the world's financial and commercial markets and have contributed to high levels of volatility in prices for oil and gas. In addition, unrest in the Middle East could lead to acts of terrorism in the United States, the United Kingdom or elsewhere, and acts of terrorism could be directed against companies such as ours. Armed conflicts and terrorism and their effects on us or our markets may significantly affect our business and results of operations in the future. In addition, we may incur increased costs for security, including additional physical plant security and security personnel or additional capability following a terrorist incident.

Table of Contents

We are subject to counterparty performance, credit or other risk in their provision of goods or services to us, which could adversely affect our ability to operate our facilities or conduct business activities.
We purchase from a variety of suppliers energy, capacity, fuel, natural gas, transmission service and certain commodities used in the physical operation of our businesses, as well as goods or services, including information technology rights and services, used in the administration of our businesses. Delivery of these goods and services is dependent on the continuing operational performance and financial viability of our contractual counterparties and also the markets, infrastructure or third-parties they use to provide such goods and services to us. As a result, we are subject to the risks of disruptions, curtailments or increased costs in the operation of our businesses if such goods or services are unavailable or become subject to price spikes or if a counterparty fails to perform. Such disruptions could adversely affect our ability to operate our facilities or deliver our services and collect our revenues, which could result in lower sales and/or higher costs and thereby adversely affect our results of operations. The performance of coal markets and producers may be the subject of increased counterparty risk to LKE, LG&E and KU currently due to weaknesses in such markets and suppliers. The coal industry is subject to increasing competitive pressures from natural gas markets and new or more stringent environmental regulation, including greenhouse gases or other air emissions, combustion byproducts and water inputs or discharges. Consequently, the coal industry faces increased production costs or closed customer markets.legal opinion.
 
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
 
PPL Corporation, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company

None.
 


30


Table of Contents



ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
 
U.K. Regulated Segment (PPL)
 
For a description of WPD's service territory, see "Item 1. Business - General - Segment Information - U.K. Regulated Segment." WPD has electric distribution lines in public streets and highways pursuant to legislation and rights-of-way secured from property owners. At December 31, 2016,2017, WPD's distribution system in the U.K. includes 1,7921,877 substations with a total capacity of 7273 million kVA, 56,29456,080 circuit miles of overhead lines and 82,77683,465 underground cable miles.
 
Kentucky Regulated Segment (PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
 
LG&E's and KU's properties consist primarily of regulated generation facilities, electricity transmission and distribution assets and natural gas transmission and distribution assets in Kentucky. The capacity of generation units is based on a number of factors, including the operating experience and physical condition of the units, and may be revised periodically to reflect changed circumstances. The electricity generating capacity at December 31, 20162017 was:
   LKE LG&E KU   LKE LG&E KU
Primary Fuel/Plant 
Total MW
Capacity
Summer
 
Ownership or
Other Interest
in MW
 
% Ownership
or Other
Interest
 
Ownership or
Other Interest
in MW
 
% Ownership
or Other
Interest
 
Ownership or
Other Interest
in MW
 
Total MW
Capacity
Summer
 
Ownership or
Other Interest
in MW
 
% Ownership
or Other
Interest
 
Ownership or
Other Interest
in MW
 
% Ownership
or Other
Interest
 
Ownership or
Other Interest
in MW
Coal                        
Ghent - Units 1- 4 1,917 1,917 100.00 1,917 1,919 1,919 100.00 1,919
Mill Creek - Units 1- 4 1,465 1,465 100.00 1,465  1,465 1,465 100.00 1,465 
E.W. Brown - Units 1-3 681 681 100.00 681 681 681 100.00 681
Trimble County - Unit 1 (a) 493 370 75.00 370  493 370 75.00 370 
Trimble County - Unit 2 (a) 732 549 14.25 104 60.75 445 732 549 14.25 104 60.75 445
OVEC - Clifty Creek (b) 1,164 95 5.63 66 2.50 29 1,164 95 5.63 66 2.50 29
OVEC - Kyger Creek (b) 956 78 5.63 54 2.50 24 956 78 5.63 54 2.50 24
 7,408 5,155 2,059 3,096 7,410 5,157 2,059 3,098
Natural Gas/Oil  
E.W. Brown Unit 5 (c) 130 130 53.00 69 47.00 61 130 130 53.00 69 47.00 61
E.W. Brown Units 6 - 7 292 292 38.00 111 62.00 181 292 292 38.00 111 62.00 181
E.W. Brown Units 8 - 11 (c) 484 484 100.00 484 484 484 100.00 484
Trimble County Units 5 - 6 318 318 29.00 92 71.00 226 318 318 29.00 92 71.00 226
Trimble County Units 7 - 10 636 636 37.00 235 63.00 401 636 636 37.00 235 63.00 401
Paddy's Run Units 11 - 12 35 35 100.00 35  35 35 100.00 35 
Paddy's Run Unit 13 147 147 53.00 78 47.00 69 147 147 53.00 78 47.00 69
Haefling - Units 1 - 2 24 24 100.00 24 24 24 100.00 24
Zorn Unit 14 14 100.00 14  14 14 100.00 14 
Cane Run Unit 7 662 662 22.00 146 78.00 516 662 662 22.00 146 78.00 516
Cane Run Unit 11 14 14 100.00 14   14 14 100.00 14  
 2,756 2,756 794 1,962 2,756 2,756 794 1,962
Hydro  
Ohio Falls - Units 1-8 60 60 100.00 60  64 64 100.00 64 
Dix Dam - Units 1-3 32 32 100.00 32 32 32 100.00 32
 92 92 60 32 96 96 64 32
Solar  
E.W. Brown Solar (d) 8 8 39.00 3 61.00 5 8 8 39.00 3 61.00 5
  
Total 10,264 8,011 2,916 5,095 10,270 8,017 2,920 5,097
 
(a)Trimble County Unit 1 and Trimble County Unit 2 are jointly owned with Illinois Municipal Electric Agency and Indiana Municipal Power Agency. Each owner is entitled to its proportionate share of the units' total output and funds its proportionate share of capital, fuel and other operating costs. See Note 12 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
(b)These units are owned by OVEC. LG&E and KU have a power purchase agreement that entitles LG&E and KU to their proportionate share of these unit'sunits' total output and LG&E and KU fund their proportionate share of fuel and other operating costs.costs, including debt service. Clifty Creek is located in Indiana and Kyger Creek is located in Ohio. See Note 13 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
(c)There is an inlet air cooling system attributable to these units. This inlet air cooling system is not jointly owned; however, it is used to increase production on the units to which it relates, resulting in an additional 10 MW of capacity for LG&E and an additional 88 MW of capacity for KU.


31


Table of Contents


(d)This unit is a 10 MW facility and achieves such production. The 8 MW solar facility summer capacity rating is reflective of an average expected output across the peak hours during the summer period based on average weather conditions at the solar facility.

For a description of LG&E's and KU's service areas, see "Item 1. Business - General - Segment Information - Kentucky Regulated Segment." At December 31, 2016,2017, LG&E's transmission system included in the aggregate, 45 substations (31 of which are shared with the distribution system) with a total capacity of 8 million kVA and 669 pole miles of lines. LG&E's distribution system included 97 substations (31 of which are shared with the transmission system) with a total capacity of 65 million kVA, 3,8943,892 circuit miles of overhead lines and 2,5202,553 underground cable miles. KU's transmission system included 142 substations (60 of which are shared with the distribution system) with a total capacity of 14 million kVA and 4,0684,066 pole miles of lines. KU's distribution system included 474469 substations (60 of which are shared with the transmission system) with a total capacity of 7 million kVA, 14,03014,016 circuit miles of overhead lines and 2,4432,484 underground cable miles.

LG&E's natural gas transmission system includes 4,3634,310 miles of gas distribution mains and 401396 miles of gas transmission mains, consisting of 264260 miles of gas transmission pipeline, 119117 miles of gas transmission storage lines, 18 miles of gas combustion turbine lines and one mile of gas transmission pipeline in regulator facilities. Five underground natural gas storage fields, with a total working natural gas capacity of approximately 15 Bcf, are used in providing natural gas service to ultimate consumers. KU's service area includes an additional 11 miles of gas transmission pipeline providing gas supply to natural gas combustion turbine electricity generating units.
 
Substantially all of LG&E's and KU's respective real and tangible personal property located in Kentucky and used or to be used in connection with the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity and, in the case of LG&E, the storage and distribution of natural gas, is subject to the lien of either the LG&E 2010 Mortgage Indenture or the KU 2010 Mortgage Indenture. See Note 7 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
 
LG&E and KU continuously reexamine development projects based on market conditions and other factors to determine whether to proceed with the projects, sell, cancel or expand them or pursue other options. In 2016, LG&E and KU received approval from the KPSC to develop a 4 MW solar share facility to service a solar share program. The solar share program is an optional, voluntary program that allows customers to subscribe capacity in the solar share facility. Construction is expected to begin, in 500-kilowatt phases, when subscription is complete. As of December 31, 2017, LG&E and KU have not yet constructed the first solar share facility and are actively marketing the program and continue to receive interest from customers.
 
Pennsylvania Regulated Segment (PPL and PPL Electric)
 
For a description of PPL Electric's service territory, see "Item 1. Business - General - Segment Information - Pennsylvania Regulated Segment." PPL Electric has electric transmission and distribution lines in public streets and highways pursuant to franchises and rights-of-way secured from property owners. At December 31, 2016,2017, PPL Electric's transmission system includes 4749 substations with a total capacity of 2528 million kVA and 5,3145,400 circuit miles in service. PPL Electric's distribution system includes 350351 substations with a total capacity of 1314 million kVA, 37,29137,195 circuit miles of overhead lines and 8,4948,549 underground circuit miles. All of PPL Electric's facilities are located in Pennsylvania. Substantially all of PPL Electric's distribution properties and certain transmission properties are subject to the lien of the PPL Electric 2001 Mortgage Indenture. See Note 7 to the Financial Statements for additional information.

See Note 8 to the Financial Statements for information on the Regional Transmission Line Expansion Plan.
 
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
 
See Notes 5, 6 and 13 to the Financial Statements for information regarding legal, tax litigation, regulatory and environmental proceedings and matters.
 
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
 
Not applicable.
 


32


Table of Contents


PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY,
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
 
See "Item 7. Combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Financial Condition - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Forecasted Uses of Cash" for information regarding certain restrictions on the ability to pay dividends for all Registrants.
 
PPL Corporation
 
Additional information for this item is set forth in the sections entitled "Quarterly Financial, Common Stock Price and Dividend Data," "Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters" and "Shareowner and Investor Information" of this report. At January 31, 2017,2018, there were 58,19455,409 common stock shareowners of record.
 
There were no purchases by PPLIssuer Purchase of its common stockEquity Securities during the fourth quarterFourth Quarter of 2016.2017.
PeriodTotal Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased (1)Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit)Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans of ProgramsMaximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares(or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (1)
October 1 to October 31, 2017

  
November 1 to November 30, 2017

  
December 1 to December 31, 20176,956
$36.27
  
Total6,956
$36.27
  

(1)
Represents shares of common stock withheld by PPL at the request of its executive officers to pay income taxes upon the vesting of the officer's restricted stock awards, as permitted under the terms of PPL's ICP.

PPL Electric Utilities Corporation
 
There is no established public trading market for PPL Electric's common stock, as PPL owns 100% of the outstanding common shares. Dividends paid to PPL on those common shares are determined by PPL Electric's Board of Directors. PPL Electric paid common stock dividends to PPL of $336 million in 2017 and $288 million in 2016 and $181 million in 2015.2016.
 
LG&E and KU Energy LLC
 
There is no established public trading market for LKE's membership interests. PPL owns all of LKE's outstanding membership interests. Distributions on the membership interests are paid as determined by LKE's Board of Directors. LKE made cash distributions to PPL of $402 million in 2017 and $316 million in 2016 and $219 million in 2015.2016.
 
Louisville Gas and Electric Company
 
There is no established public trading market for LG&E's common stock, as LKE owns 100% of the outstanding common shares. Dividends paid to LKE on those common shares are determined by LG&E's Board of Directors. LG&E paid common stock dividends to LKE of $192 million in 2017 and $128 million in 2016 and $119 million in 2015.2016.
 
Kentucky Utilities Company
 
There is no established public trading market for KU's common stock, as LKE owns 100% of the outstanding common shares. Dividends paid to LKE on those common shares are determined by KU's Board of Directors. KU paid common stock dividends to LKE of $226 million in 2017 and $248 million in 2016 and $153 million in 2015.2016.


33


Table of Contents


ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA
PPL Corporation (a) (b) 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Income Items (in millions)
                    
Operating revenues $7,517
 $7,669
 $7,852
 $7,263
 $6,856
 $7,447
 $7,517
 $7,669
 $7,852
 $7,263
Operating income 3,048
 2,831
 2,867
 2,561
 2,228
 3,068
 3,048
 2,831
 2,867
 2,561
Income from continuing operations after income taxes attributable to PPL shareowners 1,902
 1,603
 1,437
 1,368
 1,114
 1,128
 1,902
 1,603
 1,437
 1,368
Income (loss) from discontinued operations (net of
income taxes) (f)
 
 (921) 300
 (238) 412
 
 
 (921) 300
 (238)
Net income attributable to PPL shareowners (f) 1,902
 682
 1,737
 1,130
 1,526
 1,128
 1,902
 682
 1,737
 1,130
Balance Sheet Items (in millions)
                    
Total assets (d) 38,315
 39,301
 48,606
 45,889
 43,509
 41,479
 38,315
 39,301
 48,606
 45,889
Short-term debt (d) 923
 916
 836
 701
 296
 1,080
 923
 916
 836
 701
Long-term debt (d) 18,326
 19,048
 18,054
 18,269
 16,120
 20,195
 18,326
 19,048
 18,054
 18,269
Noncontrolling interests 
 
 
 
 18
Common equity (d) 9,899
 9,919
 13,628
 12,466
 10,480
 10,761
 9,899
 9,919
 13,628
 12,466
Total capitalization (d) 29,148
 29,883
 32,518
 31,436
 26,914
 32,036
 29,148
 29,883
 32,518
 31,436
Financial Ratios                    
Return on common equity - % (d)(f) 19.2
 5.8
 13.0
 9.8
 13.8
 10.9
 19.2
 5.8
 13.0
 9.8
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (c) 3.8
 2.8
 2.8
 2.4
 2.1
 3.1
 3.8
 2.8
 2.8
 2.4
Common Stock Data                    
Number of shares outstanding - Basic (in thousands)                    
Year-end 679,731
 673,857
 665,849
 630,321
 581,944
 693,398
 679,731
 673,857
 665,849
 630,321
Weighted-average 677,592
 669,814
 653,504
 608,983
 580,276
 685,240
 677,592
 669,814
 653,504
 608,983
Income from continuing operations after income taxes
available to PPL common shareowners - Basic EPS
 $2.80
 $2.38
 $2.19
 $2.24
 $1.91
 $1.64
 $2.80
 $2.38
 $2.19
 $2.24
Income from continuing operations after income taxes
available to PPL common shareowners - Diluted EPS
 $2.79
 $2.37
 $2.16
 $2.12
 $1.90
 $1.64
 $2.79
 $2.37
 $2.16
 $2.12
Net income available to PPL common shareowners - Basic EPS $2.80
 $1.01
 $2.64
 $1.85
 $2.61
 $1.64
 $2.80
 $1.01
 $2.64
 $1.85
Net income available to PPL common shareowners - Diluted EPS $2.79
 $1.01
 $2.61
 $1.76
 $2.60
 $1.64
 $2.79
 $1.01
 $2.61
 $1.76
Dividends declared per share of common stock $1.52
 $1.50
 $1.49
 $1.47
 $1.44
 $1.58
 $1.52
 $1.50
 $1.49
 $1.47
Book value per share (d) $14.56
 $14.72
 $20.47
 $19.78
 $18.01
 $15.52
 $14.56
 $14.72
 $20.47
 $19.78
Market price per share $34.05
 $34.13
 $36.33
 $30.09
 $28.63
 $30.95
 $34.05
 $34.13
 $36.33
 $30.09
Dividend payout ratio - % (e)(f) 55
 149
 57
 84
 55
 96
 55
 149
 57
 84
Dividend yield - % (g) 4.5
 4.4
 4.1
 4.9
 5.0
 5.1
 4.5
 4.4
 4.1
 4.9
Price earnings ratio (e)(f)(g) 12.2
 33.8
 13.9
 17.1
 11.0
 18.9
 12.2
 33.8
 13.9
 17.1
Sales Data - GWh                    
Domestic - Electric energy supplied - wholesale 2,177
 2,241
 2,365
 2,383
 2,304
 2,084
 2,177
 2,241
 2,365
 2,383
Domestic - Electric energy delivered - retail 67,474
 67,798
 68,569
 67,848
 66,931
 65,751
 67,474
 67,798
 68,569
 67,848
U.K. - Electric energy delivered 74,728
 75,907
 75,813
 78,219
 77,467
 74,317
 74,728
 75,907
 75,813
 78,219

(a)The earnings each year were affected by several items that management considers special. See "Results of Operations - Segment Earnings" in "Item 7. Combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for a description of special items in 2017, 2016 2015 and 2014.2015. The earnings for 2015, 2014 and 2013 were also affected by the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply and the sale of the Montana hydroelectric generating facilities. See Note 8 to the Financial Statements for a discussion of discontinued operations in 2015 and 2014.2015.
(b)See "Item 1A. Risk Factors" and Notes 1, 6 and 13 to the Financial Statements for a discussion of uncertainties that could affect PPL's future financial condition.
(c)Computed using earnings and fixed charges of PPL and its subsidiaries. Fixed charges consist of interest on short and long-term debt, amortization of debt discount, expense and premium-net, other interest charges, the estimated interest component of operating rentals and preferred securities distributions of subsidiaries. See Exhibit 12(a) for additional information.
(d)2015 reflects the impact of the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply and a $3.2 billion related dividend.
(e)Based on diluted EPS.
(f)2015 includes an $879 million loss on the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply, reflecting the difference between PPL's recorded value for the Supply segment and the estimated fair value determined in accordance with the applicable accounting rules under GAAP. 2015 also includes five months of Supply segment earnings, compared to 12 months in 2014.2014 and 2013.
(g)Based on year-end market prices.


34


Table of Contents


ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA

PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company
 
Item 6 is omitted as PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU meet the conditions set forth in General Instructions (I)(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K.



35


Table of Contents


Item 7. Combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
(All Registrants)
 
This "Item 7. Combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" is separately filed by PPL, PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU. Information contained herein relating to any individual Registrant is filed by such Registrant solely on its own behalf, and no Registrant makes any representation as to information relating to any other Registrant. The specific Registrant to which disclosures are applicable is identified in parenthetical headings in italics above the applicable disclosure or within the applicable disclosure for each Registrant's related activities and disclosures. Within combined disclosures, amounts are disclosed for individual Registrants when significant.
 
The following should be read in conjunction with the Registrants' Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes. Capitalized terms and abbreviations are defined in the glossary. Dollars are in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise noted.
 
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" includes the following information:
 
"Overview" provides a description of each Registrant's business strategy and a discussion of important financial and operational developments.

"Results of Operations" for all Registrants includes a "Statement of Income Analysis," which discusses significant changes in principal line items on the Statements of Income, comparing 2017 with 2016 and 2016 with 2015 and 2015 with 2014.2015. For PPL, "Results of Operations" also includes "Segment Earnings" and "Margins" which provide a detailed analysis of earnings by reportable segment. These discussions include non-GAAP financial measures, including "Earnings from Ongoing Operations" and "Margins" and providesprovide explanations of the non-GAAP financial measures and a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measures to the most comparable GAAP measure. The "2017"2018 Outlook" discussion identifies key factors expected to impact 20172018 earnings. For PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU, a summary of earnings and margins is also provided.

"Financial Condition - Liquidity and Capital Resources" provides an analysis of the Registrants' liquidity positions and credit profiles. This section also includes a discussion of forecasted sources and uses of cash and rating agency actions.

"Financial Condition - Risk Management" provides an explanation of the Registrants' risk management programs relating to market and credit risk.

"Application of Critical Accounting Policies" provides an overview of the accounting policies that are particularly important to the results of operations and financial condition of the Registrants and that require their management to make significant estimates, assumptions and other judgments of inherently uncertain matters.

Overview
 
For a description of the Registrants and their businesses, see "Item 1. Business."
 
On June 1, 2015, PPL completed the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply, which combined its competitive power generation businesses with those of Riverstone to form a new, stand-alone, publicly traded company named Talen Energy. See Note 8 to the Financial Statements for additional information.

Business Strategy
 
(All Registrants)
 
Following the June 1, 2015 spinoff of PPL Energy Supply, PPL completed its strategic transformation to a fully regulated business model consisting ofoperating seven diverse, high-performing utilities. These utilities are located in the U.K., Pennsylvania and Kentucky and each jurisdiction has different regulatory structures and customer classes. The Company believes this diverse portfolio provides strong earnings and dividend growth potential that will create significant value for its shareowners and positions PPL well for continued growth and success.


Table of Contents

PPL's businesses of WPD, PPL Electric, LG&E and KU plan to achieve growth by providing efficient, reliable and safe operations and strong customer service, maintaining constructive regulatory relationships and achieving timely recovery of costs. These businesses are expected to achieve strong, long-term growth in rate base in the U.S. and RAV as applicable,in the U.K., driven by planned significant capital expenditures to maintain existing assets and improve system reliability and, for LKE, LG&E and


36


Table of Contents


KU, to comply with federal and state environmental regulations related to coal-fired electricity generation facilities. Additionally, significant transmission rate base growth is expected through at least 2020 at PPL Electric.

For the U.S. businesses, our strategy is to recover capital project costs efficiently through various rate-making mechanisms, including periodic base rate case proceedings using forward test years, annual FERC formula rate mechanisms and other regulatory agency-approved recovery mechanisms designed to limit regulatory lag. In Kentucky, the KPSC has adopted a series of regulatory mechanisms (ECR, DSM, GLT, fuel adjustment clause, gas supply clause and recovery on construction work-in-progress) that reduce regulatory lag and provide timely recovery of and return on, as appropriate, prudently incurred costs. In addition, the KPSC requires a utility to obtain a CPCN prior to constructing a facility, unless the construction is an ordinary extension of existing facilities in the usual course of business or does not involve sufficient capital outlay to materially affect the utility's financial condition. Although such KPSC proceedings do not directly address cost recovery issues, the KPSC, in awarding a CPCN, concludes that the public convenience and necessity require the construction of the facility on the basis that the facility is the lowest reasonable cost alternative to address the need. In Pennsylvania, the FERC transmission formula rate, DSIC mechanism, Smart Meter Rider and other recovery mechanisms are in place to reduce regulatory lag and provide for timely recovery of and a return on, as appropriate, prudently incurred costs.

Rate base growth in the domestic utilities is expected to result in earnings growth for the foreseeable future. In 2017, earnings from the U.K. Regulated segment are expected to declinedeclined mainly due to the unfavorable impact of lower GBP to U.S. dollar exchange rates. RAV growth is expected in the U.K. Regulated segment throughduring the RIIO-ED1 price control period which ends on March 31, 2023 and to result in earnings growth after 2017in 2018 through at least 2020. See "Item 1. Business - Segment Information - U.K. Regulated Segment" for additional information on RIIO-ED1.

To manage financing costs and access to credit markets, and to fund capital expenditures, a key objective of the Registrants is to maintain their investment grade credit ratings and adequate liquidity positions. In addition, the Registrants have financial and operational risk management programs that, among other things, are designed to monitor and manage exposure to earnings and cash flow volatility, as applicable, related to changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and counterparty credit quality. To manage these risks, PPL generally uses contracts such as forwards, options and swaps. See "Financial Condition - Risk Management" below for further information.

Earnings generated by PPL's U.K. subsidiaries are subject to foreign currency translation risk. Due to theBecause WPD's earnings represent such a significant portion of PPL's consolidated earnings, contributed from WPD, PPL enters into foreign currency contracts to economically hedge the value of the GBP versus the U.S. dollar. These hedges do not receive hedge accounting treatment under GAAP. See "Financial and Operational Developments - U.K. Membership in European Union" for aadditional discussion of the U.K. earnings hedging activity in the third and fourth quarters of 2016.activity.

The U.K. subsidiaries also have currency exposure to the U.S. dollar to the extent of their U.S. dollar denominated debt. To manage these risks, PPL generally uses contracts such as forwards, options and cross-currency swaps that contain characteristics of both interest rate and foreign currency exchange contracts.

As discussed above, a key component of this strategy is to maintain constructive relationships with regulators in all jurisdictions in which we operate (U.K., U.S. federal and state). This is supported by our strong culture of integrity and delivering on commitments to customers, regulators and shareowners, and a commitment to continue to improve our customer service, reliability and efficiency of operations.operational efficiency.

Financial and Operational Developments
 
U.S. Tax Reform (All Registrants)

Tax reform has been discussed as a high priorityOn December 22, 2017, President Trump signed into law the TCJA. Substantially all of the new U.S. presidential administration. Significant uncertainty exists asprovisions of the TCJA are effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017. The TCJA includes significant changes to the ultimatetaxation of corporations, including provisions specifically applicable to regulated public utilities. The more significant changes that may be made,impact the timingRegistrants are:

The reduction in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from a top marginal rate of those changes35% to a flat rate of 21%, effective January 1, 2018;
The exclusion from U.S. federal taxable income of dividends from foreign subsidiaries and the related impactassociated "transition tax;"
Limitations on the tax deductibility of interest expense, with an exception to PPL's financial condition or resultsthese limitations for regulated public utilities;
Full current year expensing of operations. The Company is workingcapital expenditures with industry groups and carefully monitoring related developments in an effort both to have inputexception for regulated public utilities that qualify for the exception to the legislative process where possibleinterest expense limitation; and plan effectively to respond to any forthcoming changes in a manner that will optimize value for ratepayers and shareowners.


37


Table of Contents


The continuation of certain rate normalization requirements for accelerated depreciation benefits. For non-regulated businesses, the TCJA generally provides for full expensing of property acquired after September 27, 2017.

As a result, PPL expects cash flows at its domestic utilities to decline as the benefit of the lower U.S. federal corporate income tax rate is passed through to its utility customers. In addition, as PPL is not a current federal tax payer because of available net operating loss carry forwards, there is no immediate corporate cash benefit associated with the lower tax rate. The lack of cash benefit resulted in degradation of PPL’s projected financial credit metrics. In an effort to maintain its current credit rating, PPL, among other things, currently plans to issue about $1 billion of equity in 2018. This compares to PPL's actual 2017 equity issuances of $482 million.

The changes enacted by the TCJA were recorded as an adjustment to the Registrants' deferred tax provision, and have been reflected in "Income Taxes" on the Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2017 as follows:
 PPL PPL Electric LKE LG&E KU
Income tax expense (benefit)$321
 $(13) $112
 $
 $

The components of these adjustments are discussed below:

Reduction of U.S. Federal Corporate Income Tax Rate

At the date of enactment, the Registrants' deferred taxes were remeasured based upon the new U.S. federal corporate income tax rate of 21%. For PPL’s regulated entities, the changes in deferred taxes were, in large part, recorded as an offset to either a regulatory asset or regulatory liability and will be reflected in future rates charged to customers. The rate reduction on non-regulated deferred tax assets and liabilities were recorded as an adjustment to the Registrants' deferred tax provision, and have been reflected in "Income Taxes" on the Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2017 as follows:
 PPL PPL Electric LKE LG&E KU
Income tax expense (benefit)$220
 $(13) $112
 $
 $

For PPL's U.S. regulated operations, reductions in accumulated deferred income tax balances due to the reduction in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate to 21% under the provisions of the TCJA may result in amounts previously collected from utility customers for these deferred taxes to be refundable to such customers over a period of time. The TCJA includes provisions that stipulate how these excess deferred taxes are to be passed back to customers for certain accelerated tax depreciation benefits. Potential refunds of other deferred taxes will be determined by the Registrants’ regulators. The Balance Sheets at December 31, 2017 reflect the increase to the Registrants' net regulatory liabilities as a result of the TCJA as follows:
 PPL PPL Electric LKE LG&E KU
Net Increase in Regulatory Liabilities$2,185
 $1,019
 $1,166
 $532
 $634

Transition Tax

The TCJA included a conversion from a worldwide tax system to a territorial tax system, effective January 1, 2018. In the transition to the territorial regime, a one-time transition tax was imposed on PPL’s unrepatriated accumulated foreign earnings in 2017. These earnings were treated as a taxable deemed dividend to PPL of approximately $462 million. As the PPL consolidated U.S. group had a taxable loss for 2017, inclusive of the taxable deemed dividend, the foreign tax credits associated with the deemed dividend were recorded as a deferred tax asset. However, it is expected that under the TCJA, the current and prior year foreign tax credit carryforwards will not be fully realizable.

As a result, the net deferred income tax expense impact of the deemed repatriation was $101 million and was recorded in "Income Taxes" on the PPL Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2017 and "Deferred tax liabilities" on the PPL Balance Sheet at December 31, 2017.

See Note 5 to the Financial Statements for additional information.

U.K. Membership in European Union (PPL)

Significant uncertainty exists concerning the effects of the June 23, 2016 referendum in favor ofOn March 29, 2017, the U.K. withdrawal fromformally notified the European Council of the European Union (EU). In October 2016, the U.K. Prime Minister, Theresa May, announced her of its intent to invokewithdraw from the EU, thereby commencing the two-year negotiation period to establish the terms of that withdrawal under Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty (Article 50) by March 31, 2017.Treaty. Article 50 specifies that if a member state decides to withdraw from the EU, it shouldmust notify the European


38


Table of Contents


Council of its intention to leave the EU, negotiate the terms of withdrawal and establish the legal grounds for its future relationship with the EU. Article 50 provides two years from the date of the Article 50 notification to conclude negotiations. Failure to complete negotiations within two years, unless negotiations are extended, would result in the treaties governing the EU no longer being applicable to the U.K. with there being no agreement in place governing the U.K.'s relationship with the EU. Under the terms of Article 50, negotiations can only be extended beyond two years if all of the 27 remaining EU states agree to an extension. Any withdrawal agreement will need to be approved by both the European Council and the European Parliament. There remains significant uncertainty as to whether the events referred to in the Prime Minister's announcement will occur within the times suggested as well as the ultimate outcome of the withdrawal negotiations and the related impact on the U.K. economy and the GBP to U.S. dollar exchange rate.

In response to the decrease in the GBP to U.S. dollar exchange rate that occurred subsequent to the U.K.'s vote to withdraw from the EU, PPL has executed additional hedges to mitigate the foreign currency exposureexchange risk to the Company's U.K. earnings. In the third quarter of 2016, PPL settled existing hedges related to 2017 and 2018 anticipated earnings, resulting in receipt of approximately $310 million of cash, and entered into new hedges at market rates. The notional amount of the settled hedges was approximately £1.3 billion (approximately $2.0 billion based on contracted rates) with termination dates from January 2017 through November 2018. The settlement did not have a significant impact on net income as the hedge values were previously marked to fair value and recognized in "Other Income (Expense) - net" on the Statement of Income.

Additionally, in the third and fourth quarters of 2016, PPL restructured existing hedges related to 2016 and 2017 anticipated earnings and entered into additional hedges using forward contracts for 2018. This restructuring did not have a significant impact on 2016 net income as the hedge values continue to be marked to fair value. As of January 31, 2017,February 20, 2018, PPL's foreign currencyexchange exposure related to budgeted earnings is 92%100% hedged for 2017 at an average ratethe remainder of $1.21 per GBP, 87% hedged for 2018 at an average rate of $1.42$1.34 per GBP, and 50%100% hedged for 2019 at an average rate of $1.34$1.39 per GBP and 35% hedged for 2020 at an average rate of $1.46 per GBP.

PPL cannot predict either the short-term or long-term impact to foreign currency exchange rates or long-term impact on PPL's financial condition that may be experienced as a result of anythe actions that may be taken by the U.K. government to withdraw from the EU, although such impacts could be significant.

Regulatory Requirements

(All Registrants)
 
The Registrants cannot predict the impact that future regulatory requirements may have on their financial condition or results of operations.
 
(PPL)

RIIO-2 Framework Review

In July 2017, Ofgem published an open letter commencing its RIIO-2 framework review, which covers all U.K. gas and electricity, transmission and distribution price controls. The purpose of this framework review is to build on lessons learned from the current price controls and to develop a framework that will be adaptable to meeting the needs of an evolving U.K. energy sector.

The letter sets out the context for the development of the next price controls, RIIO-2, and seeks views from stakeholders on the RIIO-2 framework. Responses to the open letter were published in September 2017 and will be used to guide the full RIIO-2 framework consultation which is expected to be published in March of 2018. The promulgation of sector specific price controls will begin with the gas and electricity transmission networks, with electricity distribution price control work scheduled to begin in 2020, at which time Ofgem plans to publish its RIIO-ED2 strategy consultation document.

The current electricity distribution price control, RIIO-ED1, continues through March 31, 2023 and will not be impacted by this RIIO-2 consultation process. PPL cannot predict the outcome of this process or the long-term impact it or the final RIIO-ED2 regulations will have on its financial condition or results of operations.

RIIO-ED1 Mid-period Review

In December 2017, Ofgem initiated a consultation on a potential RIIO-ED1 mid-period review (MPR). The RIIO framework allows for a MPR of outputs halfway through the price control. Ofgem is consulting on three potential approaches:
whether to implement a MPR as currently defined;
whether to implement a MPR with an extension for WPD rail electrification; and
whether to implement a MPR with a significant extension of scope to include financial parameters.

Ofgem’s initial assessment as set forth in its December 2017 consultation publication is that a MPR as currently defined under RIIO-ED1 is not required. In addition, Ofgem recognized that the rail electrification is outside the scope of the MPR and that implementing a MPR to include financial parameters could undermine the stability of the regulatory regime. The consultation, however, requests interested party comments on those conclusions. The period for submission of comments to the consultation closed on February 2, 2018. Formal consultation responses have been submitted by PPL and WPD. A decision on whether to


39


Table of Contents


proceed with a MPR is expected in spring 2018. If Ofgem decides to launch a MPR, it will consult on detailed proposals in summer 2018 and any associated changes to DNO licenses would be in place by April 1, 2019. Although, PPL cannot predict the outcome of the consultation process, a MPR is not expected to have a significant impact on PPL's financial condition or results of operations.

(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
 
The businesses of LKE, LG&E and KU are subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental laws, rules and regulations, including those pertaining to CCRs, GHG, ELGs MATS and the Clean Power Plan. See "Financial Condition - Environmental Matters" below for additional information on the CCRs requirements. See Note 6, Note 13 and Note 19 to the Financial Statements for a discussion of the otherthese significant environmental matters. These and other stringent environmental requirements led PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU to retire approximately 800 MW of coal-fired generating plants in Kentucky, primarily in 2015. Additionally, KU anticipates retiring two older coal-fired units at the E.W. Brown plant in 2019 with a combined summer rating capacity of 272 MW.
 
Also as a result of the environmental requirements discussed above, LKE projects $1.4 billion$828 million ($0.6 billion335 million at LG&E and $0.8 billion$493 million at KU) in environmental capital investment over the next five years. See PPL's "Financial Condition - Forecasted Uses of Cash - Capital Expenditures", Note 6 and Note 13 for additional information.

(PPL)Rate Case Proceedings


Table of Contents

U.K. Distribution Revenue Reduction
In December 2013, WPD and other U.K. DNOs announced agreements with the U.K. Department of Energy and Climate Change and Ofgem to a reduction of £5 per residential customer of electricity distribution revenues that otherwise would have been collected in the regulatory year beginning April 1, 2014. Full recovery of the revenue reduction in GBP, together with the associated carrying cost will occur in the regulatory year which began April 1, 2016. Revenues for the U.K. Regulated segment were adversely affected by $19 million ($15 million after-tax or $0.02 per share) in 2015 and $40 million ($31 million after-tax or $0.05 per share) in 2014. Revenues for the U.K. Regulated segment were positively affected by $39 million ($31 million after-tax or $0.05 per share) in 2016. PPL projects revenues for 2017 will be positively affected by $16 million ($13 million after-tax or $0.02 per share).
U.K. Tax Rate Change
The U.K. Finance Act 2016, enacted in September 2016, reduced the U.K. statutory income tax rate effective April 1, 2020 from 18% to 17%. As a result of this change, PPL reduced its net deferred tax liabilities and recognized an income tax benefit of $42 million in 2016. Of this amount, $37 million relates to deferred taxes recorded in prior years and is treated as a special item.

U.K. Foreign Tax Credits

PPL will amend certain prior year U.S. federal income tax returns to claim foreign tax credits, rather than deduct foreign taxes, resulting in an income tax benefit of approximately $35 million recognized in the fourth quarter of 2016. This decision was prompted by changes to the Company's most recent business plan.
Discount Rate Change for U.K. Pension Plans
In selecting the discount rate for its U.K. pension plans, WPD historically used a single weighted-average discount rate in the calculation of net periodic defined benefit cost. WPD began using individual spot rates to measure service cost and interest cost for the calculation of net periodic defined benefit cost in 2016. In 2016, this change in discount rate resulted in lower net periodic defined benefit costs recognized on PPL's Statement of Income of $43 million ($34 million after-tax or $0.05 per share). See "Application of Critical Accounting Policies-Defined Benefits" for additional information.
Regional Transmission Expansion Plan (PPL and PPL Electric)
In July 2014, PPL Electric announced Project Compass, a proposal to construct a new multi-state transmission line. In October 2015, PPL Electric filed an interconnection application with the New York Independent System Operator for the first segment of the project which contains a proposed 95-mile, $500 million to $600 million line between Blakely, Pennsylvania, and Ramapo, New York. The proposed line is intended to provide significant economic benefits for electricity customers in New York and also to provide grid reliability and grid security benefits for electricity customers in both states. The proposal envisions construction to begin in 2021 and for the project to be in operation by 2023. Numerous approvals will be required, including, among others, the public utility commissions of Pennsylvania and New York, the New York Independent System Operator, PJM, and FERC. As originally proposed in 2014, Project Compass would have run from western Pennsylvania into New York and New Jersey and also south into Maryland, covering approximately 725 miles at an estimated cost of $4 billion to $6 billion. The project has been revised to include about 475 miles of transmission line in Pennsylvania and New York at an estimated cost of $3 billion to $4 billion. Beyond this segment, no schedule is proposed for the rest of the project. There can be no assurance that this segment of Project Compass will be approved as proposed. Additionally, PPL Electric is continuing to study the project and may modify it in the future. The capital expenditures related to this project are excluded from the Capital Expenditures table included in "Liquidity and Capital Resources-Forecasted Uses of Cash" below. 
Rate Case Proceedings (PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)

OnIn November 23, 2016, LG&E and KU filed requests with the KPSC for increases in annual base electricity rates of approximately $103 million at KU and an increase in annual base electricity and gas rates of approximately $94 million and $14 million at LG&E. The proposed base rate increases would result in an electricity rate increase of 6.4% at KU and electricity and gas rate increases of 8.5% and 4.2% at LG&E. New rates are expected to become effective on July 1, 2017.rates. LG&E's and KU's applications includeincluded requests for CPCNs for implementing an Advanced Metering System program and a Distribution Automation program. The applications are based on

In April and May 2017, LG&E and KU, along with all intervening parties to the proceeding, filed with the KPSC, stipulation and recommendation agreements (stipulations) resolving all issues with the parties. Among other things, the proposed stipulations provided for increases in annual revenue requirements associated with LG&E base electricity rates of $59 million, LG&E base gas rates of $8 million and KU base electricity rates of $55 million, reflecting a forecasted test year of July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018 and a requested return on equity of 10.23%. A number9.75%, the withdrawal of parties have been granted intervention requests inLG&E's and KU's request for a CPCN for the proceedings. Data

TableAdvanced Metering System and other changes to the revenue requirements, which dealt primarily with the timing of Contents
cost recovery, including depreciation rates.

discoveryIn June 2017, the KPSC issued orders approving, with certain modifications, the proposed stipulations filed in April and May 2017. The orders modified the filingstipulations to provide for increases in annual revenue requirements associated with LG&E base electricity rates of written testimony will continue through April 2017. A public hearing$57 million, LG&E base gas rates of $7 million, KU base electricity rates of $52 million and incorporated an authorized return on equity of 9.7%. Consistent with the applications is scheduled to commence on May 2, 2017.stipulations, the orders approved LG&E's and KU's request for implementing a Distribution Automation program and their withdrawal of a request for a CPCN for the Advanced Metering System program. The orders also approved new depreciation rates for LG&E and KU cannot predictthat resulted in higher depreciation of approximately $15 million ($4 million for LG&E and $11 million for KU) in 2017, exclusive of net additions to PP&E. The orders resulted in base electricity and gas rate increases of 5.2% and 2.1% at LG&E and a base electricity rate increase of 3.2% at KU. The new base rates and all elements of the outcomeorders became effective July 1, 2017. On June 23, 2017, the KPSC issued orders establishing an authorized return on equity of these proceedings.9.7% for all of LG&E's and KU's existing approved ECR plans and projects, replacing the prior authorized return on equity levels of 9.8% for CCR projects and 10% for all other ECR approved projects, effective with bills issued in August 2017. The annual impact of the new authorized return for ECR projects is not expected to be significant.

(LKE and KU)

On September 29, 2017, KU filed a request seeking approval from the VSCC to increase annual Virginia base electricity revenue by $7 million, representing an increase of 10.4%. KU's request is based on an authorized 10.42% return on equity. Subject to regulatory review and approval, new rates would become effective July 1, 2018.

(PPL, LKE and KU)

In October 31, 2016, KU filed a request with the FERC to modify its formula rates to provide for the recovery of CCR impoundment closure costs from its departing municipal customers. OnIn December 30, 2016, the FERC accepted the revised rate schedules providing recovery of the costs effective December 31, 2016, subject to refund, and established limited hearing and settlement judge procedures relating to determining the applicable amortization period. In March 2017, the parties reached a


40


Table of Contents


settlement in principle regarding a suitable amortization period. In June 2017, a FERC judge issued an order implementing the settlement's rates on an interim basis, effective July 1, 2017. In August 2017, the FERC issued a final order approving the settlement.

TCJA Impact on LG&E and KU Rates (PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)

On December 21, 2017, Kentucky Industrial Utility Customers, Inc. submitted a complaint with the KPSC against LG&E and KU, as well as other utility companies in Kentucky, alleging that their respective rates would no longer be fair, just and reasonable following the enactment of the TCJA reducing the federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. The complaint requested the KPSC to issue an order requiring LG&E and KU to begin deferring, as of January 1, 2018, the revenue requirement effect of all income tax expense savings resulting from the federal corporate income tax reduction, including the amortization of excess deferred income taxes by recording those savings in a regulatory liability account and establishing a process by which the federal corporate income tax savings will be passed back to customers.

On December 27, 2017, as a result of the complaint, the KPSC ordered LG&E and KU to satisfy or address the complaint and commence recording regulatory liabilities to reflect the reduction in the federal corporate tax rate to 21% and the associated savings in excess deferred taxes on an interim basis until utility rates are adjusted to reflect the federal tax savings.

On January 8, 2018, LG&E and KU responded to the complaint, denying certain claims in the complaint but concurring that the TCJA will result in savings for their customers. LG&E and KU have stated in their responses that the companies have recorded regulatory liabilities as of December 31, 2017 to reflect the reduction in the federal corporate tax rate and the associated savings in excess deferred taxes and will make changes to their ECR, DSM and LG&E's GLT rate mechanisms to begin providing the applicable savings to customers. LG&E and KU also offered to establish a new bill credit mechanism effective with the April 2018 billing cycle to begin distributing the tax savings associated with base rates to customers.

On January 29, 2018, LG&E and KU reached a settlement agreement to commence returning savings related to the TCJA to their customers. The savings will be distributed through their ECR, DSM and LG&E's GLT rate mechanisms beginning in March 2018 and through a new bill credit mechanism from April 1, 2018 through April 30, 2019. The estimated impact of the rate reduction represents approximately $91 million in KU electricity revenues, $69 million in LG&E electricity revenues and $17 million in LG&E gas revenues for the period January 2018 through April 2019. Ongoing tax savings are expected to also be addressed in LG&E's and KU's next Kentucky base rate case. LG&E and KU have indicated their intent to file an application for base rate changes during 2018 to be effective during spring 2019. The settlement agreement is subject to review and approval by the KPSC. An order in the proceeding may occur during the first quarter of 2018.

Additionally, on January 8, 2018, the VSCC ordered KU, as well as other utilities in Virginia, to accrue regulatory liabilities reflecting the Virginia jurisdictional revenue requirement impacts of the reduced federal corporate tax rate.

The FERC has not issued any guidance on the effect on rates of the TCJA. 

LG&E and KU cannot predict the outcome of these proceedings.

TCJA Impact on PPL Electric Rates(PPL and PPL Electric)

The PUC issued a Secretarial Letter on February 12, 2018 regarding the TCJA. The Commission is requesting comments from interested parties addressing whether the Commission should adjust current customer rates to reflect the reduced federal income tax expense and, if so, the appropriate negative surcharge or other methodology that would permit immediate adjustment to consumer rates, and whether the surcharge or other said methodology should provide that any refunds to customers due to reduced taxes be effective as of January 1, 2018. In addition, the Secretarial Letter requests certain Pennsylvania regulated utilities, including PPL Electric, to provide certain data related to the effect of the TCJA on PPL Electric’s income tax expense and rate base including whether any of the potential tax savings from the reduced federal corporate tax rate can be used for purposes other than to reduce customer rates. PPL Electric’s responses are due to the PUC not later than March 9, 2018.

The FERC has not issued any guidance on the effect on rates of the TCJA.

Discontinued Operations (PPL)
 
The operations of PPL's Supply segment prior to its June 1, 2015 spinoff are included in "Income (Loss)"Loss from Discontinued Operations (net of income taxes)" on the 2015 and 2014 StatementsStatement of Income.


41


Table of Contents



See Note 8 to the Financial Statements for additional information related to the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply, including the components of Discontinued Operations.

Results of Operations

(PPL)
 
The "Statement of Income Analysis" discussion below describes significant changes in principal line items on PPL's Statements of Income, comparing year-to-year changes. The "Segment Earnings" and "Margins" discussions for PPL provide a review of results by reportable segment. These discussions include non-GAAP financial measures, including "Earnings from Ongoing Operations" and "Margins," and provide explanations of the non-GAAP financial measures and a reconciliation of those measures to the most comparable GAAP measure. The "2017"2018 Outlook" discussion identifies key factors expected to impact 20172018 earnings.
 
Tables analyzing changes in amounts between periods within "Statement of Income Analysis," "Segment Earnings" and "Margins" are presented on a constant GBP to U.S. dollar exchange rate basis, where applicable, in order to isolate the impact of the change in the exchange rate on the item being explained. Results computed on a constant GBP to U.S. dollar exchange rate basis are calculated by translating current year results at the prior year weighted-average GBP to U.S. dollar exchange rate.
 
(PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU)
 
A "Statement of Income Analysis, Earnings and Margins" is presented separately for PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU.
The "Statement of Income Analysis" discussion below describes significant changes in principal line items on the Statements of Income, comparing year-to-year changes. The "Earnings" discussion provides a summary of earnings. The "Margins" discussion includes a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to "Operating Income."



PPL: Statement of Income Analysis, Segment Earnings and Margins
 
Statement of Income Analysis

Net income for the years ended December 31 includes the following results.
      Change      Change
2016 2015 2014 2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Operating Revenues$7,517
 $7,669
 $7,852
 $(152) $(183)$7,447
 $7,517
 $7,669
 $(70) $(152)
Operating Expenses                  
Operation                  
Fuel791
 863
 965
 (72) (102)759
 791
 863
 (32) (72)
Energy purchases706
 855
 924
 (149) (69)685
 706
 855
 (21) (149)
Other operation and maintenance1,745
 1,938
 1,856
 (193) 82
1,635
 1,745
 1,938
 (110) (193)
Depreciation926
 883
 923
 43
 (40)1,008
 926
 883
 82
 43
Taxes, other than income301
 299
 317
 2
 (18)292
 301
 299
 (9) 2
Total Operating Expenses4,469
 4,838
 4,985
 (369) (147)4,379
 4,469
 4,838
 (90) (369)
Other Income (Expense) - net390
 108
 105
 282
 3
(255) 390
 108
 (645) 282
Interest Expense888
 871
 843
 17
 28
901
 888
 871
 13
 17
Income Taxes648
 465
 692
 183
 (227)784
 648
 465
 136
 183
Income from Continuing Operations After Income Taxes1,902
 1,603
 1,437
 299
 166
1,128
 1,902
 1,603
 (774) 299
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations (net of income taxes)
 (921) 300
 921
 (1,221)
Loss from Discontinued Operations (net of income taxes)
 
 (921) 
 921
Net Income$1,902
 $682
 $1,737
 $1,220
 $(1,055)$1,128
 $1,902
 $682
 $(774) $1,220



42


Table of Contents


Operating Revenues
 
The increase (decrease) in operating revenues was due to:
2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Domestic:      
PPL Electric Distribution price (a)$126
 $22
$53
 $126
PPL Electric Distribution volume(9) (4)(21) (9)
PPL Electric PLR Revenue (b)(135) 15
(16) (135)
PPL Electric Transmission Formula Rate59
 60
34
 59
LKE Base rates68
 64
58
 68
LKE Volumes(c)1
 (85)(73) 1
LKE Fuel and other energy prices (b)(d)(81) (113)10
 (81)
LKE ECR39
 86
10
 39
Other(17) (17)(9) (17)
Total Domestic51
 28
46
 51
U.K.:      
Price98
 (99)60
 98
Volume(36) 5
(30) (36)
Line loss accrual adjustments (c)
 65
Foreign currency exchange rates(255) (188)(154) (255)
Other(10) 6
8
 (10)
Total U.K.(203) (211)(116) (203)
Total$(152) $(183)$(70) $(152)

(a)Distribution rider prices resulted in an increase of $47 million in 2017 compared with 2016. Distribution rate case effective January 1, 2016, resulted in increasesan increase of $160 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.in 2016 compared with 2015.
(b)DecreasesDecrease in 2016 compared with 2015 was primarily due to lower energy purchase prices.
(c)Decrease in 2017 compared with 2016 was primarily due to milder weather in 2017.
(d)Decrease in 2016 compared with 2015 was due to lower recoveries of fuel and energy purchases primarily as a result ofdue to lower commodity costs at LKE and lower energy purchase prices at PPL Electric.

Table of Contents

(c)In 2014, Ofgem issued its final decision on the DPCR4 line loss incentives and penalties mechanism, which resulted in a $65 million reduction to Operating Revenues in 2014. See Note 6 to the Financial Statements for additional information.costs.

Fuel

Fuel decreased $32 million in 2017 compared with 2016 primarily due to a decrease in fuel usage driven by milder weather in 2017.

Fuel decreased $72 million in 2016 compared with 2015 primarily due to a decrease in market prices for coal and natural gas.

Fuel decreased $102 million in 2015 compared with 2014 due to a $57 million decrease in volumes, driven by milder weather during the fourth quarter of 2015, and a $45 million decrease in commodity costs as a result of a decrease in market prices for coal and natural gas.

Energy Purchases

Energy purchases decreased $21 million in 2017 compared with 2016 primarily due to lower PLR prices of $17 million.

Energy purchases decreased $149 million in 2016 compared with 2015 primarily due to a $124 million decrease in PLR prices and a $12 million decrease in PLR volumes at PPL Electric and a $9 million decrease in the market price of natural gas and a $5 million decrease in natural gas volumes at LKE.

Energy purchases decreased $69 million in 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due to a $38 million decrease in the market price

43


Table of natural gas and a $30 million decrease in natural gas volumes at LKE.Contents


Other Operation and Maintenance

The increase (decrease) in other operation and maintenance was due to:
2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Domestic: 
  
 
  
LKE plant operations and maintenance (a)$(19) $9
$(2) $(19)
LKE pension expense(12) 14
1
 (12)
PPL Electric payroll-related costs(26) 2
(12) (26)
PPL Electric Act 129(15) 9
9
 (15)
PPL Electric contractor related expenses7
 7
(4) 7
PPL Electric vegetation management4
 7
(17) 4
PPL Electric universal service programs3
 6
(3) 3
Storm costs6
 (18)4
 6
Bad debts(5) 
(17) (5)
Stock compensation expense5
 (6)
Third-party costs related to the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply (Note 8)(13) 5

 (13)
Separation benefits related to the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply (Note 8)(8) (12)
 (8)
Corporate costs previously included in discontinued operations (b)8
 27
Stock compensation expense(6) 3
Corporate costs previously included in discontinued operations
 8
Other18
 26
(1) 18
U.K.: 
  
 
  
Pension expense (c)(b)(86) (14)(67) (86)
Foreign currency exchange rates(33) (33)(15) (33)
Third-party engineering(8) 7
6
 (8)
Engineering management7
 19
National Grid exit charges(2) 11
Other(13) 7
3
 (8)
Total$(193) $82
$(110) $(193)
 
(a)Includes a $29 million reduction of costs in 2016 compared with 2015 due to the retirement of Cane Run and Green River coal units partially offset by $5 million of additional costs for Cane Run Unit 7 plant operations.
(b)The increase in 2015 compared with 2014 was due to the corporate costs allocated to PPL Energy Supply (and included in discontinued operations) prior to the spin. As a result of the spinoff on June 1, 2015, these corporate costs now remain in continuing operations.
(c)The decrease in 2016 compared with 2015 wasdecreases were primarily due to an increaseincreases in expected returns on higher asset balances and lower interest costs due to a change in the discount rate methodology.costs.



Table of Contents

Depreciation

The increase (decrease) in depreciation was due to: 
2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Additions to PP&E, net$76
 $77
$93
 $76
Foreign currency exchange rates(27) (19)(16) (27)
Network asset useful life extension (a)
 (84)
Depreciation rates (a)15
 
Other(6) (14)(10) (6)
Total$43
 $(40)$82
 $43

(a)Effective JanuaryHigher depreciation rates were effective July 1, 2015, after completion of a review of the useful lives of its distribution network assets, WPD extended the weighted average useful lives of these assets to 69 years from 55 years resulting in lower depreciation.2017 at LG&E and KU.

Taxes, Other Than Income
 
The increase (decrease) in taxes, other than income was due to: 
2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
State gross receipts tax (a)$11
 $(14)$3
 $11
Domestic property tax expense4
 5
4
 4
Domestic capital stock tax(6) 
Foreign currency exchange rates(15) (11)(8) (15)
Other2
 2
(2) 2
Total$2
 $(18)$(9) $2
 
(a)2016 increased compared with 2015 includesdue to the settlement of thea 2011 gross receipts tax audit that resulted in the reversal of $17 million of previously recognized reserves.reserves in 2015.


44


Table of Contents



Other Income (Expense) - net
 
Other income (expense) - net decreased $645 million in 2017 compared with 2016 and increased $282 million in 2016 compared with 2015 and increased $3 million in 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due to changes in realized and unrealized gains (losses) on foreign currency contracts to economically hedge GBP denominated earnings from WPD.
 
Interest Expense
 
The increase (decrease) in interest expense was due to: 
2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Long-term debt interest expense (a)$63
 $61
$34
 $63
Short-term debt interest7
 2
Hedging activities and ineffectiveness(4) (4)1
 (4)
Loss on extinguishment of debt (b)
 (9)
Foreign currency exchange rates(43) (26)(26) (43)
Other1
 6
(3) (1)
Total$17
 $28
$13
 $17
 
(a)The increaseInterest expense increased in 2017 compared with 2016, primarily due to accretion on Index linked bonds at WPD and a debt issuance at PPL Electric in May 2017.

Interest expense increased in 2016 compared with 2015 was primarily due to debt issuances at WPD in November 2015, LG&E and KU in September 2015 and PPL Capital Funding in May 2016 as well as higher interest rates on bonds refinanced in September 2015 at LG&E and KU.
The increase in 2015 compared with 2014 was primarily due to 2015 including interest expense related to certain PPL Energy Funding debt that was previously associated with PPL's former Supply segment and included in "Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations (net of income taxes) in 2014.
(b)In March 2014, a $9 million loss was recorded related to PPL Capital Funding's remarketing and debt exchange of the junior subordinated notes originally issued in April 2011 as a component of the 2011 Equity Units.



Income Taxes

The increase (decrease) in income taxes was due to: 
2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Change in pre-tax income at current period tax rates$184
 $(18)$(223) $184
Valuation allowance adjustments (a)(8) (31)20
 (8)
Federal and state tax reserve adjustments (b)22
 (21)
 22
Foreign income tax return adjustments(10) 2
U.S. income tax on foreign earnings net of foreign tax credit (c)(50) (55)89
 (50)
U.K. Finance Act adjustments (d)42
 (90)
Interest benefit on U.K. financing activities3
 (15)
Stock-based compensation (e)(10) 
Impact of U.K. Finance Acts (d)33
 42
Deferred tax impact of U.S. tax reform (e)220
 
Stock-based compensation (f)7
 (10)
Other
 3

 1
Total$183
 $(227)$136
 $183

(a)During 2016,2017, PPL recorded deferred tax expense foran increase in valuation allowances of $23 million primarily related to the increaseforeign tax credits recorded in Pennsylvania net operating loss carryforwards2016. The future utilization of these credits is expected to be unutilized.lower as a result of the TCJA.

During 2017 and 2016, PPL recorded deferred income tax expense of $16 million and $13 million for valuation allowances primarily related to increased Pennsylvania net operating loss carryforwards expected to be unutilized.

During 2015, PPL recorded $24 million of deferred income tax expense related to deferred tax valuation allowances. PPL recorded state deferred income tax expense of $12 million primarily related to increased Pennsylvania net operating loss carryforwards expected to be unutilized and $12 million of federal deferred income tax expense primarily related to federal tax credit carryforwards that are expected to expire as a result of lower future taxable earnings due to the extension of bonus depreciation.

As a result of the PPL Energy Supply spinoff announcement, PPL recorded $50 million of deferred income tax expense during 2014 to adjust the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets primarily for state net operating loss carryforwards that were previously supported by the future earnings of PPL Energy Supply. See Note 8 to the Financial Statements for additional information on the spinoff.
(b)
During 2015, PPL recorded a $9$9 million income tax benefit related to a planned amendment of a prior period tax return and a $12 million income tax benefit related to the settlement of thean IRS audit for the tax years 1998-2011.
(c)During 2016, 2017, PPL recorded a federal income tax benefit of $35 million primarily attributable to UK pension contributions.

During 2017, PPL recorded deferred income tax expense of $83 million primarily related to enactment of the TCJA. The enacted tax law included a conversion from a worldwide tax system to a territorial tax system, effective January 1, 2018. In the transition to the territorial regime, a one-time transition tax was imposed on PPL’s unrepatriated accumulated foreign earnings in 2017. These earnings were treated as a taxable deemed dividend to PPL of approximately $462 million, including $205 million of foreign tax credits. As the PPL consolidated U.S. group had a taxable loss for 2017, inclusive of the taxable deemed dividend, these credits were recorded as a deferred tax asset. However, it is expected that under the TCJA, only $83 million of the $205 million of foreign tax credits will be realized in the carry forward period. Accordingly, a valuation allowance on the current year foreign tax credits in the amount of $122 million has been recorded to reflect the reduction in the future utilization of the credits. The foreign tax credits


45


Table of Contents


associated with the deemed repatriation result in a gross carryforward and corresponding deferred tax asset of $205 million offset by a valuation allowance of $122 million.

PPL recorded lower income taxes in 2016 compared with 2015 primarily attributable to foreign tax credit carryforwards, arising from a decision to amend prior year tax returns to claim foreign tax credits rather than deduct foreign taxes. This decision was prompted by changes to the Company's most recent business plan.

During 2015, PPL recorded lower income taxes primarily due to a decrease in taxable dividends.
During 2014, PPL recorded $47 million of income tax expense primarily attributable to taxable dividends.
(d)The U.K.’s Finance Act 2016, enacted in September 2016, reducesreduced the U.K. statutory income tax rate effective April 1, 2020 from 18% to 17% effective April 1, 2020.. As a result, PPL reduced its net deferred tax liabilities and recognized a $42 million deferred income tax benefit induring 2016.

The U.K.'s Finance Act 2015, enacted in November 2015, reducesreduced the U.K. statutory income tax rate from 20% to 19% effective April 1, 2017 and from 19% to 18% effective April 1, 2020. As a result, PPL reduced its net deferred tax liabilities and recognized a $90 million deferred income tax benefit induring 2015, related to both rate decreases.
(e)During 2017, PPL recorded deferred income tax expense for the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate reduction from 35% to 21% enacted by the TCJA.
(f)During 2016, PPL recorded lower income tax expense related to the application of new stock-based compensation accounting guidance. See Note 1 ofto the Financial Statements for additional information.

See Note 5 to the Financial Statements for additional information on income taxes.
 
Income (Loss)Loss from Discontinued Operations (net of income taxes)
 
Income (Loss)Loss from Discontinued Operations (net of income taxes) for 2015 and 2014 includes the results of operations of PPL Energy Supply, which was spun off from PPL on June 1, 2015 and substantially represents PPL's former Supply segment. See "Discontinued Operations" in Note 8 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
 
Segment Earnings

PPL's net income by reportable segments were as follows:
      Change      Change
2016 2015 2014 2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
U.K. Regulated$1,246
 $1,121
 $982
 $125
 $139
$652
 $1,246
 $1,121
 $(594) $125
Kentucky Regulated398
 326
 312
 72
 14
286
 398
 326
 (112) 72
Pennsylvania Regulated338
 252
 263
 86
 (11)359
 338
 252
 21
 86
Corporate and Other (a)(80) (96) (120) 16
 24
(169) (80) (96) (89) 16
Discontinued Operations (b)
 (921) 300
 921
 (1,221)
 
 (921) 
 921
Net Income$1,902
 $682
 $1,737
 $1,220
 $(1,055)$1,128
 $1,902
 $682
 $(774) $1,220
 

Table of Contents

(a)Primarily represents financing and certain other costs incurred at the corporate level that have not been allocated or assigned to the segments, which are presented to reconcile segment information to PPL's consolidated results. 2017 includes $97 million of additional income tax expense related to the enactment of the TCJA. See Note 5 to the Financial Statements for additional information. 2015 and 2014 includeincludes certain costs related to the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply. See Note 8 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
(b)As a result of the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply, substantially representing PPL's former Supply segment, the earnings of the Supply segment prior to the spinoff are included in Discontinued Operations. 2015 includes an $879 million charge reflecting the difference between PPL's recorded value for the Supply segment and its estimated fair value as of the spinoff date, determined in accordance with the applicable accounting rules under GAAP. See Note 8 to the Financial Statements for additional information.

Earnings from Ongoing Operations
 
Management utilizes "Earnings from Ongoing Operations" as a non-GAAP financial measure that should not be considered as an alternative to net income, an indicator of operating performance determined in accordance with GAAP. PPL believes that Earnings from Ongoing Operations is useful and meaningful to investors because it provides management's view of PPL's earnings performance as another criterion in making investment decisions. In addition, PPL's management uses Earnings from Ongoing Operations in measuring achievement of certain corporate performance goals, including targets for certain executive incentive compensation. Other companies may use different measures to present financial performance. 

Earnings from Ongoing Operations is adjusted for the impact of special items. Special items are presented in the financial tables on an after-tax basis with the related income taxes on special items separately disclosed. Income taxes on special items, when applicable, are calculated based on the effective tax rate of the entity where the activity is recorded. Earnings from Ongoing Operations for 2014 also reflects, within the Corporate and Other category, the impact of spinoff dissynergies that, if not mitigated, would remain with PPL after completion of the spinoff. Special items include:

Unrealized gains or losses on foreign currency-relatedcurrency economic hedges (as discussed below).
Spinoff of the Supply segment discontinued operations.segment.
Gains and losses on sales of assets not in the ordinary course of business.


46


Table of Contents


Impairment charges. 
WorkforceSignificant workforce reduction and other restructuring effects.
Acquisition and divestiture-related adjustments.
Other charges or credits that are, in management's view, non-recurring or otherwise not reflective of the company's ongoing operations.

Unrealized gains or losses on foreign currency economic hedges include the changes in fair value of foreign currency contracts used to hedge GBP-denominated anticipated earnings. The changes in fair value of these contracts are recognized immediately within GAAP earnings. Management believes that excluding these amounts from Earnings from Ongoing Operations until settlement of the contracts provides a better matching of the financial impacts of those contracts with the economic value of PPL's underlying hedged earnings. See Note 17 to the Financial Statements and "Risk Management" below for additional information on foreign currency-relatedcurrency economic activity.

PPL's Earnings from Ongoing Operations by reportable segment were as follows: 
      Change      Change
2016 2015 2014 2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
U.K. Regulated$1,015
 $968
 $907
 $47
 $61
$885
 $1,015
 $968
 $(130) $47
Kentucky Regulated398
 343
 312
 55
 31
395
 398
 343
 (3) 55
Pennsylvania Regulated338
 252
 265
 86
 (13)349
 338
 252
 11
 86
Corporate and Other (b)(77) (74) (135) (3) 61
(76) (77) (74) 1
 (3)
Earnings from Ongoing Operations$1,674
 $1,489
 $1,349
 $185
 $140
$1,553
 $1,674
 $1,489
 $(121) $185
 
(a)2014 was adjusted to include costs that were previously allocated to the Supply segment that would remain with PPL after the completion of the transaction, if left unmitigated.
(b)Costs were lower in 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due to the benefits of corporate restructuring.

See "Reconciliation of Earnings from Ongoing Operations" below for a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to Net Income.

U.K. Regulated Segment
 
The U.K. Regulated segment consists of PPL Global, which primarily includes WPD's regulated electricity distribution operations, the results of hedging the translation of WPD's earnings from GBP into U.S. dollars, and certain costs, such as U.S.

Table of Contents

income taxes, administrative costs, and certain acquisition-related financing costs. The U.K. Regulated segment represents 66%58% of PPL's Net Income for 20162017 and 38%41% of PPL's assets at December 31, 2016.2017.
 
Net Income and Earnings from Ongoing Operations include the following results.
      Change      Change
2016 2015 2014 2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Operating revenues$2,207
 $2,410
 $2,621
 $(203) $(211)$2,091
 $2,207
 $2,410
 $(116) $(203)
Other operation and maintenance344
 477
 482
 (133) (5)272
 344
 477
 (72) (133)
Depreciation233
 242
 337
 (9) (95)230
 233
 242
 (3) (9)
Taxes, other than income135
 148
 157
 (13) (9)127
 135
 148
 (8) (13)
Total operating expenses712
 867
 976
 (155) (109)629
 712
 867
 (83) (155)
Other Income (Expense) - net386
 123
 127
 263
 (4)(261) 386
 123
 (647) 263
Interest Expense402
 417
 461
 (15) (44)397
 402
 417
 (5) (15)
Income Taxes233
 128
 329
 105
 (201)152
 233
 128
 (81) 105
Net Income1,246
 1,121
 982
 125
 139
652
 1,246
 1,121
 (594) 125
Less: Special Items231
 153
 75
 78
 78
(233) 231
 153
 (464) 78
Earnings from Ongoing Operations$1,015
 $968
 $907
 $47
 $61
$885
 $1,015
 $968
 $(130) $47
 
The following after-tax gains (losses), which management considers special items, impacted the U.K. Regulated segment's results and are excluded from Earnings from Ongoing Operations. 


47


Table of Contents


 Income Statement Line Item 2016 2015 2014
Foreign currency-related economic hedges, net of tax of $4, ($30), ($68) (a)Other Income (Expense) - net $(8) $55
 $127
Settlement of foreign currency contracts, net of tax of ($108), $0, $0 (b)Other Income (Expense) - net 202
 
 
Change in U.K. tax rate (c)Income Taxes 37
 78
 
WPD Midlands acquisition-related adjustment, net of tax of $0, ($1), $0Other operation and maintenance 
 2
 
Settlement of certain income tax positions (d)Income Taxes 
 18
 
Change in WPD line loss accrual, net of tax of $0, $0, $13 (e)Operating Revenues 
 
 (52)
Total  $231
 $153
 $75
 Income Statement Line Item 2017 2016 2015
Foreign currency economic hedges, net of tax of $59, $4, ($30) (a)Other Income (Expense) - net $(111) $(8) $55
U.S. tax reform (b)Income Taxes (122) 
 
Settlement of foreign currency contracts, net of tax of $0, ($108), $0 (c)Other Income (Expense) - net 
 202
 
Change in U.K. tax rate (d)Income Taxes 
 37
 78
WPD Midlands acquisition-related adjustment, net of tax of $0, $0, ($1)Other operation and maintenance 
 
 2
Settlement of certain income tax positions (e)Income Taxes 
 
 18
Total  $(233) $231
 $153
 
(a)Represents unrealized gains (losses) on contracts that economically hedge anticipated GBP-denominated earnings. 2016 includes the reversal of $310 million ($202 million after-tax) of unrealized gains related to the settlement of 2017 and 2018 contracts.
(b)During 2017, PPL recorded deferred income tax expense for the enactment of the TCJA. See Note 5 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
(c)In 2016, PPL settled 2017 and 2018 foreign currency contracts, resulting in $310 million of cash received ($202 million after-tax). The settlement did not have a material impact on net income as the contracts were previously marked to fair value and recognized in "Other Income (Expense) - net" on the Statement of Income. See Note 17 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
(c)(d)The U.K. Finance Acts of 2016 and 2015 reduced the U.K.'s statutory income tax rates. As a result, PPL reduced its net deferred tax liability and recognized a deferred tax benefit in 2016 and 2015. See Note 5 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
(d)(e)Relates to the April 2015 settlement of the IRS audit for the tax years 1998-2011. See Note 5 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
(e)In 2014, Ofgem issued its final decision on the DPCR4 line loss incentives and penalties mechanism. As a result, during 2014 WPD increased its existing liability for over-recovery of line losses. See Note 6 to the Financial Statements for additional information.

The changes in the components of the U.K. Regulated segment's results between these periods were due to the factors set forth below, which reflect amounts classified as U.K. Gross Margins, the items that management considers special and the effects of movements in foreign currency exchange, including the effects of foreign currency hedge contracts, on separate lines and not in their respective Statement of Income line items. 
 2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 2014
U.K. 
  
Gross margins$62
 $(110)
Other operation and maintenance94
 (14)
Depreciation(18) 76
Interest expense(28) 3
Other(3) (5)
Income taxes(18) 48

Table of Contents

2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
U.K. 
  
Gross margins$30
 $62
Other operation and maintenance64
 94
Depreciation(14) (18)
Interest expense(21) (28)
Other(6) (3)
Income taxes11
 (18)
U.S.   
   
Interest expense and other(2) 12
1
 (2)
Income taxes41
 55
(10) 41
Foreign currency exchange, after-tax(81) (4)(185) (81)
Earnings from Ongoing Operations47
 61
(130) 47
Special items, after-tax78
 78
(464) 78
Net Income$125
 $139
$(594) $125
 
U.K. 

See "Margins - Changes in Margins" for an explanation of U.K. Gross Margins.

Lower other operation and maintenance expense in 2017 compared with 2016 primarily due to $67 million from higher pension income due to an increase in expected returns on higher asset balances and lower interest costs due to a lower discount rate.

Lower other operation and maintenance expense in 2016 compared with 2015 primarily due to $86 million from lowerhigher pension expenseincome due to an increase in estimatedexpected returns on higher asset balances and lower interest costs due to a change in the discount rate methodology.

LowerHigher depreciation expense in 20152017 compared with 20142016 and 2016 compared with 2015, primarily due to an $84additions to PP&E, net of retirements.

Higher interest expense in 2017 compared with 2016 primarily due to higher interest expense on indexed linked bonds.


48


Table of Contents



Higher interest expense in 2016 compared with 2015 primarily due to $16 million impact of an extension of the network asset lives. See Note 1higher long-term debt interest expense due to the Financial Statements for additional information.a debt issuance in November 2015 and $12 million higher interest expense on indexed linked bonds.

Lower income taxes in 20152017 compared with 20142016 primarily due to $25decreases of $10 million related to accelerated tax deductions and $7 million from lower U.K. tax rates, andpartially offset by an increase of $11 million from lowerhigher pre-tax income.

Higher income taxes in 2016 compared with 2015 primarily due to an increase of $21 million from higher pre-tax income, partially offset by a decrease of $7 million from lower U.K. tax rates.

U.S. 

Higher income taxes in 2017 compared with 2016 primarily due to a $37 million benefit related to foreign tax credit carryforwards in 2016, partially offset by a $29 million tax benefit on accelerated pension contributions made in the first quarter of 2017.

Lower income taxes in 2016 compared with 2015 primarily due to a benefit related to foreign tax credit carryforwards.carryforwards in 2016.

Lower income taxes in 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due to decreases in taxable dividends.

Kentucky Regulated Segment
 
The Kentucky Regulated segment consists primarily of LKE's regulated electricity generation, transmission and distribution operations of LG&E and KU, as well as LG&E's regulated distribution and sale of natural gas. In addition, certain acquisition-related financing costs are allocated to the Kentucky Regulated segment. The Kentucky Regulated segment represents 21%25% of PPL's Net Income for 20162017 and 37%35% of PPL's assets at December 31, 2016.2017.

Net Income and Earnings from Ongoing Operations include the following results.
      Change      Change
2016 2015 2014 2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Operating revenues$3,141
 $3,115
 $3,168
 $26
 $(53)$3,156
 $3,141
 $3,115
 $15
 $26
Fuel791
 863
 965
 (72) (102)759
 791
 863
 (32) (72)
Energy purchases171
 184
 253
 (13) (69)178
 171
 184
 7
 (13)
Other operation and maintenance804
 837
 815
 (33) 22
806
 804
 837
 2
 (33)
Depreciation404
 382
 354
 22
 28
439
 404
 382
 35
 22
Taxes, other than income62
 57
 52
 5
 5
65
 62
 57
 3
 5
Total operating expenses2,232
 2,323
 2,439
 (91) (116)2,247
 2,232
 2,323
 15
 (91)
Other Income (Expense) - net(9) (13) (9) 4
 (4)(3) (9) (13) 6
 4
Interest Expense260
 232
 219
 28
 13
261
 260
 232
 1
 28
Income Taxes242
 221
 189
 21
 32
359
 242
 221
 117
 21
Net Income398
 326
 312
 72
 14
286
 398
 326
 (112) 72
Less: Special Items
 (17) 
 17
 (17)(109) 
 (17) (109) 17
Earnings from Ongoing Operations$398
 $343
 $312
 $55
 $31
$395
 $398
 $343
 $(3) $55
 
The following after-tax gains (losses), which management considers special items, impacted the Kentucky Regulated segment's results and are excluded from Earnings from Ongoing Operations. 

Table of Contents

 Income Statement Line Item 2016 2015 2014
Certain income tax valuation allowances (a)Income Taxes $
 $(12) $
LKE acquisition-related adjustment, net of tax of $0, $0, $0 (b)Other Income (Expense) - net 
 (5) 
Total  $
 $(17) $
 Income Statement Line Item 2017 2016 2015
U.S. tax reform (a)Income Taxes $(112) $
 $
Adjustment to investment, net of tax of $0, $0, $0 (b)Other Income (Expense) - net (1) 
 
Settlement of indemnification agreement, net of tax of ($2), $0, $0 (c)Other Income (Expense) - net 4
 
 
Certain income tax valuation allowances (d)Income Taxes 
 
 (12)
LKE acquisition - related adjustment, net of tax of $0, $0, $0 (e)Other Income (Expense) - net ��
 
 (5)
Total  $(109) $
 $(17)
 
(a)During 2017, LKE recorded deferred income tax expense related to the enactment of the TCJA associated with LKE's non-regulated entities. See Note 5 to the Financial Statements for additional information.


49


Table of Contents


(b)KU recorded a write-off of an equity method investment.
(c)Recorded at LKE and represents the settlement of a WKE indemnification. See Note 13 to the financial statements for additional information.
(d)Recorded at LKE and represents a valuation allowance against tax credits expiring through 2020 that are more likely than not to expire before being utilized.
(b)(e)Recorded at PPL and allocated to the Kentucky Regulated segment. The amount represents a settlement between E.ON AG (a German corporation and the indirect parent of E.ON US Investments Corp., the former parent of LKE) and PPL for a tax matter.

The changes in the components of the Kentucky Regulated segment's results between these periods were due to the factors set forth below, which reflect amounts classified as Kentucky Gross Margins and the items that management considers special on separate lines and not in their respective Statement of Income line item. 
2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Kentucky Gross Margins$83
 $88
$29
 $83
Other operation and maintenance42
 (21)
 42
Depreciation(4) (1)(27) (4)
Taxes, other than income(4) (3)(2) (4)
Other Income (Expense) - net(1) 1
1
 (1)
Interest Expense(28) (13)(1) (28)
Income Taxes(33) (20)(3) (33)
Earnings from Ongoing Operations55
 31
(3) 55
Special Items, after-tax17
 (17)(109) 17
Net Income$72
 $14
$(112) $72
 
See "Margins - Changes in Margins" for an explanation of Kentucky Gross Margins.

Lower other operation and maintenance expense in 2016 compared with 2015 primarily due to a $29 million reduction of costs as a result of coal units retired in 2015 at the Cane Run and Green River plants, partially offset by $5 million of additional costs for Cane Run Unit 7 plant operations and $12 million of lower pension expense mainly due to higher discount rates and deferred amortization of actuarial losses.

Higher other operation and maintenancedepreciation expense in 20152017 compared with 20142016 primarily due to $14 millionadditions to PP&E, net of retirements, and higher pension expense and $11 million of higher costs related to the Cane Run units' retirements consisting of an inventory write-down and separation benefits, partially offset by $7 million of lower storm costs and lower bad debt expense of $6 million.

Higher interest expense for both periods primarily due to the September 2015 issuance of $550 million of incremental First Mortgage Bonds by LG&E and KU, higher interestdepreciation rates on the September 2015 issuance of $500 million of First Mortgage Bonds by LG&E and KU used to retire the same amount of First Mortgage Bonds in November 2015 and $400 million of notes refinanced by LKE with an affiliate in November 2015.effective July 1, 2017.

Higher income taxes for both periodsin 2016 compared with 2015 primarily due to higher pre-tax income.income at current period tax rates.

Pennsylvania Regulated Segment
 
The Pennsylvania Regulated segment includes the regulated electricity transmission and distribution operations of PPL Electric. In addition, certain costs are allocated to the Pennsylvania Regulated segment. The Pennsylvania Regulated segment represents 18%32% of PPL's Net Income for 20162017 and 25%24% of PPL's assets at December 31, 2016.2017.
 
Net Income and Earnings from Ongoing Operations include the following results.
       Change
 2017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Operating revenues$2,195
 $2,156
 $2,124
 $39
 $32
Energy purchases 
  
  
  
  
External507
 535
 657
 (28) (122)
Intersegment
 
 14
 
 (14)
Other operation and maintenance571
 601
 607
 (30) (6)
Depreciation309
 253
 214
 56
 39
Taxes, other than income107
 105
 94
 2
 11
Total operating expenses1,494
 1,494
 1,586
 
 (92)
Other Income (Expense) - net16
 17
 8
 (1) 9
Interest Expense142
 129
 130
 13
 (1)
Income Taxes216
 212
 164
 4
 48
Net Income359
 338
 252
 21
 86
Less: Special Items10
 
 
 10
 
Earnings from Ongoing Operations$349
 $338
 $252
 $11
 $86



50


Table of Contents


       Change
 2016 2015 2014 2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 2014
Operating revenues$2,156
 $2,124
 $2,044
 $32
 $80
Energy purchases 
  
  
  
  
External535
 657
 587
 (122) 70
Intersegment
 14
 84
 (14) (70)
Other operation and maintenance601
 607
 543
 (6) 64
Depreciation253
 214
 185
 39
 29
Taxes, other than income105
 94
 107
 11
 (13)
Total operating expenses1,494
 1,586
 1,506
 (92) 80
Other Income (Expense) - net17
 8
 7
 9
 1
Interest Expense129
 130
 122
 (1) 8
Income Taxes212
 164
 160
 48
 4
Net Income338
 252
 263
 86
 (11)
Less: Special Items
 
 (2) 
 2
Earnings from Ongoing Operations$338
 $252
 $265
 $86
 $(13)
The following after-tax loss,gain, which management considers a special item, impacted the Pennsylvania Regulated segment's results and is excluded from Earnings from Ongoing Operations.
 Income Statement Line Item 2016 2015 2014
Separation benefits, net of tax of $0, $0, $1 (a)Other operation and maintenance $
 $
 $(2)
 Income Statement Line Item 2017 2016 2015
U.S. tax reform (a)Income Taxes $10
 $
 $
Total  $10
 $
 $

(a)In June 2014,During 2017, PPL Electric's largest IBEW local ratifiedrecorded a new three-year labor agreement. In connection withdeferred income tax benefit for the new agreement, bargaining unit one-time voluntary retirement benefits were recorded.enactment of the TCJA. See Note 5 to the Financial Statements for additional information.

The changes in the components of the Pennsylvania Regulated segment's results between these periods were due to the factors set forth below, which reflect amounts classified as Pennsylvania Gross Margins and the item that management considers special on separate lines and not in their respective Statement of Income line item.items.
2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Pennsylvania Gross Margins$177
 $65
$31
 $177
Other operation and maintenance
 (58)42
 
Depreciation(39) (29)(35) (39)
Taxes, other than income(14) 18
1
 (14)
Other Income (Expense) - net9
 1
(1) 9
Interest Expense1
 (8)(13) 1
Income Taxes(48) (2)(14) (48)
Earnings from Ongoing Operations86
 (13)11
 86
Special Item, after-tax
 2
10
 
Net Income$86
 $(11)$21
 $86
 
See "Margins - Changes in Margins" for an explanation of Pennsylvania Gross Margins.

Lower other operation and maintenance expense for 2017 compared with 2016 primarily due to $17 million of lower bad debt expense, $17 million of lower vegetation management expense and $12 million of lower payroll related expenses, partially offset by $19 million of higher corporate service costs allocated to PPL Electric.
Other operation and maintenance expense for 2016 was comparable with 2015 primarily due to $26 million of lower payroll related expenses, partially offset by $8 million of higher corporate service costs allocated to PPL Electric, $8 million of higher costs for additional work done by outside vendors and other costs, which were not individually significant in comparison to the prior year.

Higher other operation and maintenance expense for 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due to $30 million of higher corporate service costs allocated to PPL Electric, $11 million of higher vegetation management expenses and related costs for additional work done by outside vendors and $5 million of higher bad debt expenses.

Higher depreciation expense for both periods primarily due to transmission and distribution additions placed into service related to the ongoing efforts to improve reliability and replace aging infrastructure and improve reliability, net of retirements.

Higher taxes, other than income for 2016 compared with 2015 and lower taxes, other than income for 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due to the settlement of a 2011 gross receipts tax audit resulting in the reversal of $17 million of previously recognized reserves in 2015.

TableHigher interest expense for 2017 compared with 2016 primarily due to the issuance of Contents

$475 million of 3.950% First Mortgage Bonds in May 2017.

Higher income taxes in 2016 compared with 2015for both periods primarily due to higher pre-tax income.income at current period tax rates.

Reconciliation of Earnings from Ongoing Operations
 
The following tables contain after-tax gains (losses), in total, which management considers special items, that are excluded from Earnings from Ongoing Operations and a reconciliation to PPL's "Net Income" for the years ended December 31. 
 2016
 U.K.
Regulated
 KY
Regulated
 PA
Regulated
 Corporate
and Other
 Total
Net Income$1,246
 $398
 $338
 $(80) $1,902
Less: Special Items (expense) benefit:         
Foreign currency-related economic hedges, net of tax of $4(8) 
 
 
 (8)
Spinoff of the Supply segment, net of tax of $2
 
 
 (3) (3)
Other:         
Settlement of foreign currency contracts, net of tax of ($108)202
 
 
 
 202
Change in U.K. tax rate37
 
 
 
 37
Total Special Items231
 
 
 (3) 228
Earnings from Ongoing Operations$1,015
 $398
 $338
 $(77) $1,674

 2015
 U.K. Regulated KY Regulated PA Regulated Corporate and Other Discontinued Operations Total
Net Income$1,121
 $326
 $252
 $(96) $(921) $682
Less: Special Items (expense) benefit:           
Foreign currency-related economic hedges, net of tax of ($30)55
 
 
 
 
 55
Spinoff of the Supply segment:           
Discontinued operations, net of tax of $30
 
 
 
 (921) (921)
Transition and transaction costs, net of tax of $6
 
 
 (12) 
 (12)
Employee transitional services, net of tax of $2
 
 
 (5) 
 (5)
Separation benefits, net of tax of $3
 
 
 (5) 
 (5)
Other:           
Change in U.K. tax rate78
 
 
 
 
 78
Settlement of certain income tax positions18
 
 
 
 
 18
WPD Midlands acquisition-related adjustment, net of tax of ($1)2
 
 
 
 
 2
Certain income tax valuation allowances
 (12) 
 
 
 (12)
LKE acquisition-related adjustment, net of tax of $0
 (5) 
 
 
 (5)
Total Special Items153
 (17) 
 (22) (921) (807)
Earnings from Ongoing Operations$968
 $343
 $252
 $(74) $
 $1,489

 2014
 
U.K.
Regulated
 
KY
Regulated
 
PA
Regulated
 
Corporate
and Other
 
Discontinued
Operations
 Total
Net Income$982
 $312
 $263
 $(120) $300
 $1,737
Less: Special Items (expense) benefit:           
Foreign currency-related economic hedges, net of tax of ($68)127
 
 
 
 
 127
Spinoff of the Supply segment:           
Supply segment earnings, net of tax of ($93)
 
 
 
 307
 307
Discontinued operations adjustments, net of tax of $3, ($3)
 
 
 (5) 5
 
Change in tax valuation allowances
 
 
 (46) 
 (46)
Transition and transaction costs, net of tax of $3, $7
 
 
 (5) (12) (17)
Separation benefits, net of tax of $6
 
 
 (12) 
 (12)
51


Table of Contents


 2014
 
U.K.
Regulated
 
KY
Regulated
 
PA
Regulated
 
Corporate
and Other
 
Discontinued
Operations
 Total
Other:           
Change in WPD line loss accrual, net of tax of $13(52) 
 
 
 
 (52)
Separation benefits, net of tax of $1
 
 (2) 
 
 (2)
Total Special Items75
 
 (2) (68) 300
 305
Dissynergies-spinoff of Supply segment expense (benefit):           
Indirect operation and maintenance, net of tax of ($33)
 
 
 47
 
 47
Interest expense, net of tax of ($20)
 
 
 29
 
 29
Depreciation, net of tax of ($5)
 
 
 7
 
 7
Total dissynergies-spinoff of Supply segment
 
 
 83
 
 83
Earnings from Ongoing Operations$907
 $312
 $265
 $(135) $
 $1,349
 2017
 U.K.
Regulated
 KY
Regulated
 PA
Regulated
 Corporate
and Other
 Total
Net Income$652
 $286
 $359
 $(169) $1,128
Less: Special Items (expense) benefit:         
Foreign currency economic hedges, net of tax of $59(111) 
 
 
 (111)
Spinoff of the Supply segment, net of tax of ($1)
 
 
 4
 4
Other:         
U.S. tax reform (a)(122) (112) 10
 (97) (321)
Adjustment to investment, net of tax of $0
 (1) 
 
 (1)
Settlement of indemnification agreement, net of tax of ($2)
 4
 
 
 4
Total Special Items(233) (109) 10
 (93) (425)
Earnings from Ongoing Operations$885
 $395
 $349
 $(76) $1,553

(a)During 2017, PPL recorded deferred income tax (expense) benefit related to the enactment of the TCJA. See Note 5 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
 2016
 U.K. Regulated KY Regulated PA Regulated Corporate and Other Total
Net Income$1,246
 $398
 $338
 $(80) $1,902
Less: Special Items (expense) benefit:         
Foreign currency economic hedges, net of tax of $4(8) 
 
 
 (8)
Spinoff of the Supply segment, net of tax of $2
 
 
 (3) (3)
Other:

 

 

 

 

Settlement of foreign currency contracts, net of tax of ($108)202
 
 
 
 202
Change in U.K. tax rate37
 
 
 
 37
Total Special Items231
 
 
 (3) 228
Earnings from Ongoing Operations$1,015
 $398
 $338
 $(77) $1,674
 2015
 
U.K.
Regulated
 
KY
Regulated
 
PA
Regulated
 
Corporate
and Other
 
Discontinued
Operations
 Total
Net Income$1,121
 $326
 $252
 $(96) $(921) $682
Less: Special Items (expense) benefit:           
Foreign currency economic hedges, net of tax of ($30)55
 
 
 
 
 55
Spinoff of the Supply segment:           
Discontinued operations, net of tax of $30
 
 
 
 (921) (921)
Transition and transaction costs, net of tax of $6
 
 
 (12) 
 (12)
Employee transitional services, net of tax of $2
 
 
 (5) 
 (5)
Separation benefits, net of tax of $3
 
 
 (5) 
 (5)
Other

 

 

 

 

 

Change in U.K. tax rate78
 
 
 
 
 78
Settlement of certain income tax positions18
 
 
 
 
 18
WPD Midlands acquisition-related adjustment, net of tax of ($1)2
 
 
 
 
 2
Certain income tax valuation allowances
 (12) 
 
 
 (12)
LKE acquisition-related adjustment, net of tax of $0
 (5) 
 
 
 (5)
Total Special Items153
 (17) 
 (22) (921) (807)
Earnings from Ongoing Operations$968
 $343
 $252
 $(74) $
 $1,489
 
Margins
 
Management also utilizes the following non-GAAP financial measures as indicators of performance for its businesses.
 
"U.K. Gross Margins" is a single financial performance measure of the electricity distribution operations of the U.K. Regulated segment. In calculating this measure, direct costs such as connection charges from National Grid, which owns and manages the electricity transmission network in England and Wales, and Ofgem license fees (recorded in "Other operation and maintenance" on the Statements of Income) are deducted from operating revenues, as they are costs passed


52


Table of Contents


through to customers. As a result, this measure represents the net revenues from the delivery of electricity across WPD's distribution network in the U.K. and directly related activities.

"Kentucky Gross Margins" is a single financial performance measure of the electricity generation, transmission and distribution operations of the Kentucky Regulated segment, LKE, LG&E and KU, as well as the Kentucky Regulated segment's, LKE's and LG&E's distribution and sale of natural gas. In calculating this measure, fuel, energy purchases and certain variable costs of production (recorded in "Other operation and maintenance" on the Statements of Income) are deducted from operating revenues. In addition, certain other expenses, recorded in "Other operation and maintenance", "Depreciation" and "Taxes, other than income" on the Statements of Income, associated with approved cost recovery mechanisms are offset against the recovery of those expenses, which are included in operating revenues. These mechanisms allow for direct recovery of these expenses and, in some cases, returns on capital investments and performance incentives. As a result, this measure represents the net revenues from electricity and gas operations.

"Pennsylvania Gross Margins" is a single financial performance measure of the electricity transmission and distribution operations of the Pennsylvania Regulated segment and PPL Electric. In calculating this measure, utility revenues and expenses associated with approved recovery mechanisms, including energy provided as a PLR, are offset with minimal impact on earnings. Costs associated with these mechanisms are recorded in "Energy purchases," "Other operation and maintenance," (which are primarily Act 129 and Universal Service program costs), "Depreciation" (which is primarily related to the Act 129 Smart Meter program) and "Taxes, other than income," (which is primarily gross receipts tax) on the Statements of Income. This performance measure includes PLR energy purchases by PPL Electric from PPL EnergyPlus, which are reflected in "Energy purchases from affiliate" in the 2015 reconciliation tables.table. As a result of the June 2015 spinoff of PPL Energy Supply and the formation of Talen Energy, PPL EnergyPlus (renamed Talen Energy Marketing) is no longer an affiliate of PPL Electric. PPL Electric's purchases from Talen Energy Marketing subsequent to May 31, 2015 are reflected in "Energy Purchases" in the reconciliation tables. This measure represents the net revenues from the Pennsylvania Regulated segment's and PPL Electric's electricity delivery operations.

These measures are not intended to replace "Operating Income," which is determined in accordance with GAAP, as an indicator of overall operating performance. Other companies may use different measures to analyze and report their results of operations. Management believes these measures provide additional useful criteria to make investment decisions. These performance measures are used, in conjunction with other information, by senior management and PPL's Board of Directors to manage operations and analyze actual results compared with budget.
 

Table of Contents

Changes in Margins

The following table shows Margins by PPL's reportable segments and by component, as applicable, for the year ended December 31 as well as the changes between periods. The factors that gave rise to the changes are described following the table.
      Change      Change
2016 2015 2014 2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
U.K. Regulated                  
U.K. Gross Margins$2,067
 $2,243
 $2,527
 $(176) $(284)$1,952
 $2,067
 $2,243
 $(115) $(176)
Impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates      (238) (174)      (145) (238)
U.K. Gross Margins excluding impact of foreign currency exchange rates      $62
 $(110)      $30
 $62
                  
Kentucky Regulated                  
Kentucky Gross Margins                  
LG&E$887
 $867
 $833
 $20
 $34
$910
 $887
 $867
 $23
 $20
KU1,122
 1,059
 1,005
 63
 54
1,128
 1,122
 1,059
 6
 63
Total Kentucky Gross Margins$2,009
 $1,926
 $1,838
 $83
 $88
$2,038
 $2,009
 $1,926
 $29
 $83
                  
Pennsylvania Regulated                  
Pennsylvania Gross Margins                  
Distribution$960
 $842
 $837
 $118
 $5
$958
 $960
 $842
 $(2) $118
Transmission454
 395
 335
 59
 60
487
 454
 395
 33
 59
Total Pennsylvania Gross Margins$1,414
 $1,237
 $1,172
 $177
 $65
$1,445
 $1,414
 $1,237
 $31
 $177
 


53


Table of Contents


U.K. Gross Margins
 
U.K. Gross Margins, excluding the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, increased in 2017 compared with 2016 primarily due to $81 million from the April 1, 2016 price increase, partially offset by $30 million from lower volumes and $21 million from the April 1, 2017 price decrease, which includes lower true-up mechanisms partially offset by higher base demand revenue.
 
U.K. Gross Margins, excluding the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, increased in 2016 compared with 2015 primarily due to $166 million from the April 1, 2016 price increase, which includesincluded $39 million of the recovery of prior customer rebates, and $21 million of other revenue adjustments in the first quarter of 2016, partially offset by $89 million from the April 1, 2015 price decrease resulting from the commencement of RIIO-ED1 and $36 million from lower volumes.
U.K. Gross Margins, excluding the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, decreased in 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due to $171 million from the April 1, 2015 price decrease resulting from the commencement of RIIO-ED1, partially offset by $46 million from the April 1, 2014 price increase.

Kentucky Gross Margins
Kentucky Gross Margins increased in 2017 compared with 2016 primarily due to higher base rates of $58 million ($32 million at LG&E and $26 million at KU) and gas cost recoveries added to base rates of $5 million at LG&E, partially offset by $41 million of lower sales volumes due to milder weather in 2017 ($15 million at LG&E and $26 million at KU).

The increases in base rates were the result of new rates approved by the KPSC effective July 1, 2017. The gas cost recoveries added to base rates were the result of the transfer of certain GLT expenses into base rates as a result of the 2016 Kentucky rate case. This transfer results in depreciation and other operation and maintenance expenses associated with the GLT program being excluded from margins in the second half of 2017, while the recovery of such costs remain in Kentucky Gross Margins through base rates.
 
Kentucky Gross Margins increased in 2016 compared with 2015 primarily due to higher base rates of $68 million ($4 million at LG&E and $64 million at KU) and returns on additional environmental capital investments of $13 million at LG&E. The increases in base rates were the result of new rates approved by the KPSC effective July 1, 2015.
 
Kentucky Gross Margins increased in 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due to higher base rates of $64 million ($3 million at LG&E and $61 million at KU) and returns on additional environmental capital investments of $53 million ($36 million at LG&E and $17 million at KU). The increases in base rates were the result of new rates approved by the KPSC effective July 1, 2015. These increases were partially offset by lower sales volumes of $28 million ($5 million at LG&E and $23 million at KU) driven by milder weather during the fourth quarter of 2015.
Pennsylvania Gross Margins
 
Distribution
Distribution margins decreased in 2017 compared with 2016 primarily due to $10 million of lower electricity sales volumes due to milder weather in 2017, partially offset by $7 million of returns on additional Smart Meter capital investments.
 
Distribution margins increased in 2016 compared with 2015 primarily due to $121 million of higher base rates, effective January 1, 2016 as a result of the 2015 rate case.
 

Table of Contents

Distribution margins increased in 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due to returns on additional distribution improvement capital investments of $17 million partially offset by a $12 million benefit recorded in the first quarter of 2014 as a result of a change in estimate of a regulatory liability.
Transmission
 
Transmission margins increased for both periodsin 2017 compared with 2016 primarily due to an increase of $51 million from returns on additional transmission capital investments focused on replacing aging infrastructure and improving reliability, partially offset by a $17 million decrease as a result of a lower PPL zonal peak load billing factor which affected transmission revenue in the first five months of 2017.

Transmission margins increased in 2016 compared with 2015 primarily due to returns on additional capital investments focused on replacing the aging infrastructure and improving reliability.

Reconciliation of Margins
 
The following tables contain the components from the Statement of Income that are included in the non-GAAP financial measures and a reconciliation to PPL's "Operating Income" for the years ended December 31. 
 2016
 
U.K.
Gross
Margins
 
Kentucky
Gross
Margins
 
PA
Gross
Margins
 Other (a) 
Operating
Income (b)
Operating Revenues$2,165
(c)$3,141
 $2,156
 $55
 $7,517
Operating Expenses         
Fuel
 791
 
 
 791
Energy purchases
 171
 535
 
 706
Other operation and maintenance98
 109
 108
 1,430
 1,745
Depreciation
 56
 
 870
 926
Taxes, other than income
 5
 99
 197
 301
Total Operating Expenses98
 1,132
 742
 2,497
 4,469
Total$2,067
 $2,009
 $1,414
 $(2,442) $3,048

 2015
 
U.K.
Gross
Margins
 
Kentucky
Gross
Margins
 PA
Gross
Margins
 Other (a) 
Operating
Income (b)
Operating Revenues$2,364
(c)$3,115
 $2,124
 $66
 $7,669
Operating Expenses         
Fuel
 863
 
 
 863
Energy purchases
 184
 657
 14
 855
Energy purchases from affiliate
 
 14
 (14) 
Other operation and maintenance121
 100
 114
 1,603
 1,938
Depreciation
 38
 
 845
 883
Taxes, other than income
 4
 102
 193
 299
Total Operating Expenses121
 1,189
 887
 2,641
 4,838
Total$2,243
 $1,926
 $1,237
 $(2,575) $2,831

 2014
 
U.K.
Gross
Margins
 
Kentucky
Gross
Margins
 PA
Gross
Margins
 Other (a) 
Operating
Income (b)
Operating Revenues$2,638
(c)$3,168
 $2,044
 $2
 $7,852
Operating Expenses         
Fuel
 965
 
 
 965
Energy purchases
 253
 587
 84
 924
Energy purchases from affiliate
 
 84
 (84) 
Other operation and maintenance111
 99
 103
 1,543
 1,856
Depreciation
 11
 
 912
 923
Taxes, other than income
 2
 98
 217
 317
Total Operating Expenses111
 1,330
 872
 2,672
 4,985
Total   $2,527
 $1,838
 $1,172
 $(2,670) $2,867
54


Table of Contents


 2017
 
U.K.
Gross
Margins
 
Kentucky
Gross
Margins
 
PA
Gross
Margins
 Other (a) 
Operating
Income (b)
Operating Revenues$2,050
(c)$3,156
 $2,195
 $46
 $7,447
Operating Expenses         
Fuel
 759
 
 
 759
Energy purchases
 178
 507
 
 685
Other operation and maintenance98
 111
 120
 1,306
 1,635
Depreciation
 64
 21
 923
 1,008
Taxes, other than income
 6
 102
 184
 292
Total Operating Expenses98
 1,118
 750
 2,413
 4,379
Total$1,952
 $2,038
 $1,445
 $(2,367) $3,068
 2016
 
U.K.
Gross
Margins
 
Kentucky
Gross
Margins
 PA
Gross
Margins
 Other (a) 
Operating
Income (b)
Operating Revenues$2,165
(c)$3,141
 $2,156
 $55
 $7,517
Operating Expenses         
Fuel
 791
 
 
 791
Energy purchases
 171
 535
 
 706
Other operation and maintenance98
 109
 108
 1,430
 1,745
Depreciation
 56
 
 870
 926
Taxes, other than income
 5
 99
 197
 301
Total Operating Expenses98
 1,132
 742
 2,497
 4,469
Total$2,067
 $2,009
 $1,414
 $(2,442) $3,048
 2015
 
U.K.
Gross
Margins
 
Kentucky
Gross
Margins
 PA
Gross
Margins
 Other (a) 
Operating
Income (b)
Operating Revenues$2,364
(c)$3,115
 $2,124
 $66
 $7,669
Operating Expenses         
Fuel
 863
 
 
 863
Energy purchases
 184
 657
 14
 855
Energy purchases from affiliate
 
 14
 (14) 
Other operation and maintenance121
 100
 114
 1,603
 1,938
Depreciation
 38
 
 845
 883
Taxes, other than income
 4
 102
 193
 299
Total Operating Expenses121
 1,189
 887
 2,641
 4,838
Total   $2,243
 $1,926
 $1,237
 $(2,575) $2,831
(a)Represents amounts excluded from Margins.
(b)As reported on the Statements of Income.
(c)2017, 2016 and 2015 and 2014 exclude $41 million, $42 million $46 million and $48$46 million of ancillary activity revenues. 2014 also excludes $65 million of revenue reductions related to adjustments to WPD's line loss accrual related to DPCR4, which is considered a special item.

2017 2018Outlook
 
(PPL)
 
LowerHigher net income is projected in 20172018 compared with 20162017. The increase in net income reflects the 2017 unfavorable impact of U.S. tax reform and unrealized losses on foreign currency economic hedges. Excluding these 2017 special items, the increase is primarily from a lower assumed GBP exchange rateattributable to increases in 2017the U.K. Regulated and 2016 tax benefits that are not expected to repeat in 2017.Pennsylvania Regulated segments. The following projections and factors underlying these projections (on an after-tax basis) are provided for PPL's segments and the Corporate and Other category and the related Registrants.
 


55


Table of Contents


(PPL's U.K. Regulated Segment)

LowerHigher net income is projected in 20172018 compared with 2016 due2017. The increase in net income reflects the 2017 unfavorable impact of U.S. tax reform and unrealized losses on foreign currency economic hedges. Excluding these 2017 special items, the increase is expected to a lowerbe driven primarily by higher assumed GBP exchange rate in 2017, lower incentive revenues, higher interest expense, higher depreciation expenserates and higher pension income, taxes, partially offset by lower operation and maintenance expense, including pension expense.higher taxes.
 
(PPL's Kentucky Regulated Segment and LKE, LG&E and KU)
 
Slightly higherHigher net income is projected in 20172018 compared with 20162017, which reflects the 2017 unfavorable impact of U.S. tax reform.
Excluding this 2017 special item, earnings in 2018 compared with 2017 are projected to be lower, driven primarily driven by electricity and gas base rate increases, partially offset by higher operation and maintenance expense, higher depreciation expense, higher interest expense and a lower tax shield on holding company interest and expenses, partially offset by an assumed return to normal weather and higher depreciation expense.base electricity and gas rates effective July 1, 2017.

(PPL's Pennsylvania Regulated Segment and PPL Electric)
 
Relatively flatHigher net income is projected in 20172018 compared with 20162017, driven primarily driven by higher transmission earnings and lower operation and maintenance expense, partially offset by higher depreciation expense and higher interest expense and higher income taxes.expense.

(PPL's Corporate and Other Category)
 
Relatively flatLower costs are projected in 20172018 compared with 2016.2017, which reflects the 2017 unfavorable impact of U.S. tax reform. Excluding this 2017 special item, costs are projected to be flat in 2018 compared to 2017, due to a lower tax shield on holding company interest expense offset by lower financing costs.
 
(All Registrants)
 
Earnings in future periods are subject to various risks and uncertainties. See "Forward-Looking Information," "Item 1. Business," "Item 1A. Risk Factors," the rest of this Item 7, and Notes 1, 6 and 13 to the Financial Statements (as applicable) for a discussion of the risks, uncertainties and factors that may impact future earnings.



PPL Electric: Statement of Income Analysis, Earnings and Margins
 
Statement of Income Analysis

Net income for the years ended December 31 includes the following results.
      Change      Change
2016 2015 2014 2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Operating Revenues$2,156
 $2,124
 $2,044
 $32
 $80
$2,195
 $2,156
 $2,124
 $39
 $32
Operating Expenses                  
Operation                  
Energy purchases535
 657
 587
 (122) 70
507
 535
 657
 (28) (122)
Energy purchases from affiliate
 14
 84
 (14) (70)
 
 14
 
 (14)
Other operation and maintenance599
 607
 543
 (8) 64
571
 599
 607
 (28) (8)
Depreciation253
 214
 185
 39
 29
309
 253
 214
 56
 39
Taxes, other than income105
 94
 107
 11
 (13)107
 105
 94
 2
 11
Total Operating Expenses1,492
 1,586
 1,506
 (94) 80
1,494
 1,492
 1,586
 2
 (94)
Other Income (Expense) - net17
 8
 7
 9
 1
11
 17
 8
 (6) 9
Interest Income from Affiliate5
 
 
 5
 
Interest Expense129
 130
 122
 (1) 8
142
 129
 130
 13
 (1)
Income Taxes212
 164
 160
 48
 4
213
 212
 164
 1
 48
Net Income$340
 $252
 $263
 $88
 $(11)$362
 $340
 $252
 $22
 $88



56


Table of Contents


Operating Revenues
 
The increase (decrease) in operating revenues was due to:
2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Distribution Price (a)$126
 $22
$53
 $126
Distribution volume(9) (4)(21) (9)
PLR (b)(135) 15
(16) (135)
Transmission Formula Rate59
 60
34
 59
Other(9) (13)(11) (9)
Total$32
 $80
$39
 $32

(a)
Distribution rider prices resulted in an increase of $47 million in 2017 compared with 2016. Distribution rate case effective January 1, 2016, resulted in increasesan increase of $160 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.in 2016 compared with 2015.
(b)InDecrease in 2016 compared with 2015 the decrease was primarily due to lower energy purchase prices as described below.

Energy Purchases

Energy purchases decreased $28 million in 2017 compared with 2016 and $122 million in 2016 compared with 2015 primarily due to lower PLR prices of $124 million. Energy purchases increased $70 million in 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due to higher PLR volumes of $73 million.prices.

Energy Purchases from Affiliate

Energy purchases from affiliate decreased by $14 million in 2016 compared with 2015 and decreased $70 million in 2015 compared with 2014 as a result of the June 1, 2015 PPL Energy Supply spinoff.
 
Other Operation and Maintenance
 
The increase (decrease) in other operation and maintenance was due to:

Table of Contents

2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Act 129$(15) $9
$9
 $(15)
Universal service programs3
 6
(3) 3
Contractor-related expenses7
 7
(4) 7
Vegetation management4
 7
(17) 4
Payroll-related costs(26) 2
(12) (26)
Corporate service costs (a)8
 30
19
 8
Storm costs9
 (11)5
 9
Bad debts (4) 6
(17) (4)
Environmental costs(6) 5

 (6)
Other12
 3
(8) 12
Total$(8) $64
$(28) $(8)
 
(a)The increase in 2015 compared with 2014 was due to higher corporate support costs charged to Electric Utilities primarily as a result of the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply.

Depreciation
 
Depreciation increased by $56 million in 2017 compared with 2016 primarily due to additional assets placed into service, related to the ongoing efforts to ensure the reliability of the delivery system and the replacement of aging infrastructure as well as the roll-out of the Act 129 Smart Meter program, net of retirements.

Depreciation increased by $39 million in 2016 compared with 2015 and by $29 million in 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due to additional assets placed into service, related to the ongoing efforts to ensure the reliability of the delivery system and the replacement of aging infrastructure, net of retirements.
 
Taxes, Other Than Income
 
Taxes, other than income increased by $11 million in 2016 compared with 2015 and decreased by $13 million in 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due to the settlement in 2015, of a 2011 gross receipts tax audit that resulted in the reversal of $17 million of previously recognized reserves.reserves in 2015.



57


Table of Contents


Interest Expense

Interest expense increased $13 million in 2017 compared with 2016, primarily due to the May 2017 issuance of $475 million of 3.950% First Mortgage Bonds due 2047.

Income Taxes
 
The increase (decrease) in income taxes was due to: 
2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Change in pre-tax income$58
 $1
Change in pre-tax income at current period tax rates$10
 $58
Depreciation not normalized(5) 2

 (5)
Stock-based compensation (a)(6) 
Deferred tax impact of U.S. tax reform (a)(13) 
Stock-based compensation (b)4
 (6)
Other1
 1

 1
Total$48
 $4
$1
 $48
 
(a)During 2017, PPL Electric recorded a deferred income tax benefit related to the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate reduction from 35% to 21% enacted by the TCJA.
(b)During 2016, PPL Electric recorded lower income tax expense related to the application of the new stock-based compensation accounting guidance. See Note 1 to the Financial Statements for additional information.

See Note 5 to the Financial Statements for additional information on income taxes.

Earnings
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Net Income$340
 $252
 $263
$362
 $340
 $252
Special item, gain (loss), after-tax
 
 (2)10
 
 
 
Excluding special items, earnings increased in 2017 compared with 2016, primarily due to lower operation and maintenance expense and higher transmission margins from additional capital investments, partially offset by a lower PPL zonal peak load billing factor, lower distribution sales volumes due to unfavorable weather, higher depreciation expense, higher interest expense and higher income taxes.

Earnings increased in 2016 compared with 2015, primarily due to higher base electricity rates for distribution effective January 1, 2016, and higher transmission margins from additional capital investments, partially offset by higher depreciation expense and the release of a gross receipts tax reserve in 2015.
 
Earnings decreased in 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expense and higher depreciation expense, partially offset by returns on additional transmission and distribution improvement capital investments and the release of a gross receipts tax reserve in 2015.

Table of Contents

The table below quantifies the changes in the components of Net Income between these periods, which reflect amounts classified as Pennsylvania Gross Margins and an item that management considers special on separate lines within the table and not in their respective Statement of Income line items.
2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Pennsylvania Gross Margins$177
 $65
$31
 $177
Other operation and maintenance2
 (58)40
 2
Depreciation(39) (29)(35) (39)
Taxes, other than income(14) 18
1
 (14)
Other Income (Expense) - net9
 1
(1) 9
Interest Expense1
 (8)(13) 1
Income Taxes(48) (2)(11) (48)
Special Item, after-tax
 2
10
 
Net Income$88
 $(11)$22
 $88
 
Margins
 
"Pennsylvania Gross Margins" is a non-GAAP financial performance measure that management utilizes as an indicator of the performance of its business. See PPL's "Results of Operations - Margins" for information on why management believes this measure is useful and for explanations of the underlying drivers of the changes between periods.
 


58


Table of Contents


The following tables contain the components from the Statements of Income that are included in this non-GAAP financial measure and a reconciliation to "Operating Income."
2016 20152017 2016
PA
Gross
Margins
 Other (a) 
Operating
Income (b)
 PA
Gross
Margins
 Other (a) 
Operating
Income (b)
PA
Gross
Margins
 Other (a) 
Operating
Income (b)
 PA
Gross
Margins
 Other (a) 
Operating
Income (b)
Operating Revenues$2,156
 $
 $2,156
 $2,124
 $
 $2,124
$2,195
 $
 $2,195
 $2,156
 $
 $2,156
Operating Expenses                      
Energy purchases535
 
 535
 657
 
 657
507
 
 507
 535
 
 535
Energy purchases from affiliate
 
 
 14
 
 14
Other operation and maintenance108
 491
 599
 114
 493
 607
120
 451
 571
 108
 491
 599
Depreciation
 253
 253
 
 214
 214
21
 288
 309
 
 253
 253
Taxes, other than income99
 6
 105
 102
 (8) 94
102
 5
 107
 99
 6
 105
Total Operating Expenses742
 750
 1,492
 887
 699
 1,586
750
 744
 1,494
 742
 750
 1,492
Total $1,414
 $(750) $664
 $1,237
 $(699) $538
$1,445
 $(744) $701
 $1,414
 $(750) $664
20142015
PA
Gross
Margins
 Other (a) 
Operating
Income (b)
PA
Gross
Margins
 Other (a) 
Operating
Income (b)
Operating Revenues$2,044
 $
 $2,044
$2,124
 $
 $2,124
Operating Expenses          
Energy purchases587
 
 587
657
 
 657
Energy purchases from affiliate84
 
 84
14
 
 14
Other operation and maintenance103
 440
 543
114
 493
 607
Depreciation
 185
 185

 214
 214
Taxes, other than income98
 9
 107
102
 (8) 94
Total Operating Expenses872
 634
 1,506
887
 699
 1,586
Total $1,172
 $(634) $538
$1,237
 $(699) $538
 
(a)Represents amounts excluded from Margins.
(b)As reported on the Statements of Income.



LKE: Statement of Income Analysis, Earnings and Margins
 
Statement of Income Analysis
 
Net income for the years ended December 31 includes the following results.
      Change      Change
2016 2015 2014 2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Operating Revenues$3,141
 $3,115
 $3,168
 $26
 $(53)$3,156
 $3,141
 $3,115
 $15
 $26
Operating Expenses                  
Operation                  
Fuel791
 863
 965
 (72) (102)759
 791
 863
 (32) (72)
Energy purchases171
 184
 253
 (13) (69)178
 171
 184
 7
 (13)
Other operation and maintenance804
 837
 815
 (33) 22
806
 804
 837
 2
 (33)
Depreciation404
 382
 354
 22
 28
439
 404
 382
 35
 22
Taxes, other than income62
 57
 52
 5
 5
65
 62
 57
 3
 5
Total Operating Expenses2,232
 2,323
 2,439
 (91) (116)2,247
 2,232
 2,323
 15
 (91)
Other Income (Expense) - net(9) (8) (9) (1) 1
(3) (9) (8) 6
 (1)
Interest Expense197
 178
 167
 19
 11
197
 197
 178
 
 19
Interest Expense with Affiliate17
 3
 
 14
 3
18
 17
 3
 1
 14
Income Taxes257
 239
 209
 18
 30
375
 257
 239
 118
 18
Net Income$429
 $364
 $344
 $65
 $20
$316
 $429
 $364
 $(113) $65


59


Table of Contents



Operating Revenues
 
The increase (decrease) in operating revenues was due to:
2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Base rates$68
 $64
$58
 $68
Volumes(a)1
 (85)(73) 1
Fuel and other energy prices (a)(b)(81) (113)10
 (81)
ECR39
 86
10
 39
Other(1) (5)10
 (1)
Total$26
 $(53)$15
 $26

(a)DecreasesDecrease in 2017 compared with 2016 was primarily due to milder weather in 2017.
(b)Decrease in 2016 compared with 2015 was due to lower recoveries of fuel and energy purchases due to lower commodity costs as described below.costs.

Fuel

Fuel decreased $32 million in 2017 compared with 2016 primarily due to a decrease in fuel usage driven by milder weather in 2017.

Fuel decreased $72 million in 2016 compared with 2015 primarily due to a decrease in market prices for coal and natural gas.

Fuel decreased $102 million in 2015 compared with 2014 due to a $57 million decrease in volumes, driven by milder weather during the fourth quarter of 2015, and a $45 million decrease in commodity costs as a result of a decrease in market prices for coal and natural gas.

Energy Purchases

Energy purchases decreased $13 million in 2016 compared with 2015 primarily due to a $9 million decrease in the market price of natural gas and a $5 million decrease in natural gas volumes driven by milder weather during the first quarter of 2016.

Energy purchases decreased $69 million in 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due to a $38 million decrease in the market price for natural gas and a $30 million decrease in natural gas volumes driven by milder weather during the fourth quarter of 2015.


Table of Contents

Other Operation and Maintenance

The increase (decrease) in other operation and maintenance was due to: 
2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Plant operations and maintenance (a)$(19) $9
$(2) $(19)
Pension expense(12) 14
1
 (12)
Timing and scope of scheduled generation maintenance outages(5) (1)(1) (5)
Storm costs(3) (7)(1) (3)
Bad debts(1) (6)
 (1)
Energy efficiency programs5
 (1)
 5
Other2
 14
5
 2
Total$(33) $22
$2
 $(33)
 
(a)IncludesDecrease in 2016 compared with 2015 was due to a $29 million reduction of costs in 2016 due to the retirement of Cane Run and Green River coal units partially offset by $5 million of additional costs for Cane Run Unit 7 plant operations.
Depreciation

Interest ExpenseDepreciation increased $35 million in 2017 compared with 2016 primarily due to a $19 million increase related to additions to PP&E, net of retirements, and a $15 million increase related to higher depreciation rates effective July 1, 2017.

Interest expenseDepreciation increased $33$22 million in 2016 compared with 2015 and increased $14 million in 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due the September 2015 issuanceto additions to PP&E, net of $550 million of incremental First Mortgage Bonds by LG&E and KU, higher interest rates on the September 2015 issuance of $500 million of First Mortgage Bonds by LG&E and KU used to retire the same amount of First Mortgage Bonds in November 2015 and $400 million of notes refinanced with an affiliate in November 2015.retirements.

Income Taxes

The increase (decrease) in income taxes was due to:
2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Higher pre-tax book income$32
 $19
Change in pre-tax income at current period tax rates$2
 $32
Certain income tax valuation allowances (a)(12) 12

 (12)
U.S. tax reform (a)112
 
Other(2) (1)4
 (2)
Total$18
 $30
$118
 $18



60


Table of Contents


(a)Management considers this a special item. See PPL's "Results of Operations - Segment Earnings - Kentucky Regulated Segment" for details of this item.During 2017, LKE recorded deferred tax expense related to the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate reduction from 35% to 21% enacted by the TCJA associated with LKE's non-regulated entities.

See Note 5 to the Financial Statements for additional information on income taxes.

Earnings
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Net Income $429
 $364
 $344
$316
 $429
 $364
Special items, gains (losses), after-tax
 (12) 
(109) 
 (12)
 
Excluding special items, earnings decreased in 2017 compared with 2016 primarily due to lower sales volumes driven by milder weather in 2017 and higher depreciation expense, partially offset by higher base electricity and gas rates effective July 1, 2017.

Excluding special items, earnings increased in 2016 compared with 2015 primarily due to higher base electricity rates effective July 1, 2015, returns on additional environmental capital investments and lower other operation and maintenance expense partially offset by higher interest expense.

Excluding special items, earnings increased in 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due to higher base rates and returns on additional environmental capital investments partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expense, income taxes, financing costs and lower sales volume. The increases in base rates were the result of new rates approved by the KPSC effective July 1, 2015. The change in sales volume was due to milder weather during the fourth quarter of 2015.
The table below quantifies the changes in the components of Net Income between these periods, which reflect amounts classified as Margins and an item that management considers special on separate lines and not in their respective Statement of

Table of Contents
Income line items.

Income line items.
2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Margins$83
 $88
$29
 $83
Other operation and maintenance42
 (21)
 42
Depreciation(4) (1)(27) (4)
Taxes, other than income(4) (3)
Other Income (Expense)-net(1) 1
Taxes, Other than income(2) (4)
Other Income (Expense) - net1
 (1)
Interest Expense(33) (14)(1) (33)
Income Taxes(30) (18)(4) (30)
Special items, after-tax (a)12
 (12)
Total$65
 $20
Special items, gains (losses), after-tax (a)(109) 12
Net Income$(113) $65

(a)See PPL's "Results of Operations - Segment Earnings - Kentucky Regulated Segment" for details of the special item.items.
 
Margins
 
"Margins" is a non-GAAP financial performance measure that management utilizes as an indicator of the performance of its business. See PPL's "Results of Operations - Margins" for an explanation of why management believes this measure is useful and the factors underlying changes between periods. Within PPL's discussion, LKE's Margins are referred to as "Kentucky Gross Margins."
 
The following tables contain the components from the Statements of Income that are included in this non-GAAP financial measure and a reconciliation to "Operating Income" for the periods ended December 31. 
2016 20152017 2016
Margins Other (a) Operating Income (b) Margins Other (a) Operating
Income (b)
Margins Other (a) Operating Income (b) Margins Other (a) Operating
Income (b)
Operating Revenues$3,141
 $
 $3,141
 $3,115
 $
 $3,115
$3,156
 $
 $3,156
 $3,141
 $
 $3,141
Operating Expenses
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
Fuel791
 
 791
 863
 
 863
759
 
 759
 791
 
 791
Energy purchases171
 
 171
 184
 
 184
178
 
 178
 171
 
 171
Other operation and maintenance109
 695
 804
 100
 737
 837
111
 695
 806
 109
 695
 804
Depreciation56
 348
 404
 38
 344
 382
64
 375
 439
 56
 348
 404
Taxes, other than income5
 57
 62
 4
 53
 57
6
 59
 65
 5
 57
 62
Total Operating Expenses1,132
 1,100
 2,232
 1,189
 1,134
 2,323
1,118
 1,129
 2,247
 1,132
 1,100
 2,232
Total $2,009
 $(1,100) $909
 $1,926
 $(1,134) $792
$2,038
 $(1,129) $909
 $2,009
 $(1,100) $909


61


Table of Contents


20142015
Margins Other (a) Operating
Income (b)
Margins Other (a) Operating
Income (b)
Operating Revenues$3,168
 $
 $3,168
$3,115
 $
 $3,115
Operating Expenses
 
 

 
 
Fuel965
 
 965
863
 
 863
Energy purchases253
 
 253
184
 
 184
Other operation and maintenance99
 716
 815
100
 737
 837
Depreciation11
 343
 354
38
 344
 382
Taxes, other than income2
 50
 52
4
 53
 57
Total Operating Expenses1,330
 1,109
 2,439
1,189
 1,134
 2,323
Total $1,838
 $(1,109) $729
$1,926
 $(1,134) $792
 
(a)Represents amounts excluded from Margins.
(b)As reported on the Statements of Income.
 


LG&E: Statement of Income Analysis, Earnings and Margins
 
Statement of Income Analysis
 
Net income for the years ended December 31 includes the following results.
      Change      Change
2016 2015 2014 2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Operating Revenues                  
Retail and wholesale$1,406
 $1,407
 $1,445
 $(1) $(38)$1,422
 $1,406
 $1,407
 $16
 $(1)
Electric revenue from affiliate24
 37
 88
 (13) (51)31
 24
 37
 7
 (13)
Total Operating Revenues1,430
 1,444
 1,533
 (14) (89)1,453
 1,430
 1,444
 23
 (14)
Operating Expenses                  
Operation                  
Fuel301
 329
 404
 (28) (75)292
 301
 329
 (9) (28)
Energy purchases153
 166
 230
 (13) (64)160
 153
 166
 7
 (13)
Energy purchases from affiliates14
 20
 14
 (6) 6
10
 14
 20
 (4) (6)
Other operation and maintenance355
 377
 379
 (22) (2)355
 355
 377
 
 (22)
Depreciation170
 162
 157
 8
 5
183
 170
 162
 13
 8
Taxes, other than income32
 28
 25
 4
 3
33
 32
 28
 1
 4
Total Operating Expenses1,025
 1,082
 1,209
 (57) (127)1,033
 1,025
 1,082
 8
 (57)
Other Income (Expense) - net(5) (6) (3) 1
 (3)(5) (5) (6) 
 1
Interest Expense71
 57
 49
 14
 8
71
 71
 57
 
 14
Income Taxes126
 114
 103
 12
 11
131
 126
 114
 5
 12
Net Income$203
 $185
 $169
 $18
 $16
$213
 $203
 $185
 $10
 $18

Operating Revenues
 
The increase (decrease) in operating revenues was due to:
2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Base rates$4
 $3
$32
 $4
Volumes(a)(8) (81)(20) (8)
Fuel and other energy prices (a)(b)(36) (51)
 (36)
ECR26
 51
5
 26
Other
 (11)6
 
Total$(14) $(89)$23
 $(14)

(a)DecreasesDecrease in 2017 compared with 2016 was primarily due to milder weather in 2017.
(b)Decrease in 2016 compared with 2015 was due to lower recoveries of fuel and energy purchases due to lower commodity costs as described below.costs.



62


Table of Contents


Fuel

Fuel decreased $28 million in 2016 compared with 2015 primarily due to a $24 million decrease in commodity costs as a result of a decrease in market prices for coal and natural gas.

Fuel decreased $75 million in 2015 compared with 2014 due to a $65 million decrease in volumes, driven by milder weather during the fourth quarter of 2015, and a $10 million decrease in commodity costs as a result of a decrease in market prices for coal and natural gas.

Energy Purchases

Energy purchases decreased $13 million in 2016 compared with 2015 primarily due to a $9 million decrease in the market price of natural gas and a $5 million decrease in natural gas volumes driven by milder weather during the first quarter of 2016.

Energy purchases decreased $64 million in 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due to a $38 million decrease in the market price for natural gas and a $30 million decrease in natural gas volumes driven by milder weather during the fourth quarter of 2015.

Table of Contents


Other Operation and Maintenance

The increase (decrease) in other operation and maintenance was due to: 
2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Plant operations and maintenance (a)$(21) $(1)$(1) $(21)
Pension expense(6) 6
1
 (6)
Timing and scope of scheduled generation maintenance outages3
 (3)
 3
Storm costs(2) (4)(1) (2)
Bad debts
 (3)
Energy efficiency programs2
 (1)
 2
Other2
 4
1
 2
Total$(22) $(2)$
 $(22)
 
(a)IncludesDecrease in 2016 compared with 2015 was due to a $23 million reduction of costs in 2016 due to the retirement of Cane Run coal units.

Interest Expense
 
Interest expense increased $14 million in 2016 compared with 2015 and increased $8 million in 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due to the issuance of $300 million of incremental First Mortgage Bonds in September 2015 and higher interest rates on $250 million of First Mortgage Bonds refinanced by LG&E.
  
Earnings
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Net Income $203
 $185
 $169
$213
 $203
 $185
Special items, gains (losses), after-tax (a)
 
 

 
 

(a)There are no items management considers special for the periods presented.

Earnings in 2017 compared with 2016 increased primarily due to higher base electricity and gas rates effective July 1, 2017, partially offset by lower sales volumes driven by milder weather in 2017 and higher depreciation expense.

Earnings in 2016 compared with 2015 increased primarily due to returns on additional environmental capital investments and lower other operation and maintenance expense, partially offset by higher interest expense.

Earnings in 2015 compared with 2014 increased primarily due to returns on additional environmental capital investments partially offset by higher income taxes, financing costs and lower sales volume. The change in sales volume was due to milder weather during the fourth quarter of 2015.

The table below quantifies the changes in the components of Net Income between these periods, which reflect amounts classified as Margins on a separate line and not in their respective Statement of Income line items. 
2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Margins$20
 $34
$23
 $20
Other operation and maintenance23
 (3)2
 23
Depreciation3
 9
(10) 3
Taxes, other than income(3) (2)
 (3)
Other Income (Expense) - net1
 (3)
 1
Interest Expense(14) (8)
 (14)
Income Taxes(12) (11)(5) (12)
Net Income$18
 $16
$10
 $18
 
Margins
 
"Margins" is a non-GAAP financial performance measure that management utilizes as an indicator of the performance of its business. See PPL's "Results of Operations - Margins" for an explanation of why management believes this measure is useful


63


Table of Contents


and the underlying drivers of the changes between periods. Within PPL's discussion, LG&E's Margins are included in "Kentucky Gross Margins."
 

Table of Contents

The following tables contain the components from the Statements of Income that are included in this non-GAAP financial measure and a reconciliation to "Operating Income" for the periods ended December 31.
2016 20152017 2016
Margins Other (a) Operating
Income (b)
 Margins Other (a) Operating
Income (b)
Margins Other (a) Operating
Income (b)
 Margins Other (a) Operating
Income (b)
Operating Revenues$1,430
 $
 $1,430
 $1,444
 $
 $1,444
$1,453
 $
 $1,453
 $1,430
 $
 $1,430
Operating Expenses                      
Fuel301
 
 301
 329
 
 329
292
 
 292
 301
 
 301
Energy purchases167
 
 167
 186
 
 186
170
 
 170
 167
 
 167
Other operation and maintenance43
 312
 355
 42
 335
 377
45
 310
 355
 43
 312
 355
Depreciation29
 141
 170
 18
 144
 162
32
 151
 183
 29
 141
 170
Taxes, other than income3
 29
 32
 2
 26
 28
4
 29
 33
 3
 29
 32
Total Operating Expenses543
 482
 1,025
 577
 505
 1,082
543
 490
 1,033
 543
 482
 1,025
Total $887
 $(482) $405
 $867
 $(505) $362
$910
 $(490) $420
 $887
 $(482) $405
 
20142015
Margins Other (a) Operating
Income (b)
Margins Other (a) Operating
Income (b)
Operating Revenues$1,533
 $
 $1,533
$1,444
 $
 $1,444
Operating Expenses          
Fuel404
 
 404
329
 
 329
Energy purchases244
 
 244
186
 
 186
Other operation and maintenance47
 332
 379
42
 335
 377
Depreciation4
 153
 157
18
 144
 162
Taxes, other than income1
 24
 25
2
 26
 28
Total Operating Expenses700
 509
 1,209
577
 505
 1,082
Total $833
 $(509) $324
$867
 $(505) $362
 
(a)Represents amounts excluded from Margins.
(b)
As reported on the Statements of Income. 



64


Table of Contents


KU: Statement of Income Analysis, Earnings and Margins
 
Statement of Income Analysis
 
Net income for the years ended December 31 includes the following results.

       Change
 2016 2015 2014 2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 2014
Operating Revenues         
Retail and wholesale$1,735
 $1,708
 $1,723
 $27
 $(15)
Electric revenue from affiliate14
 20
 14
 (6) 6
Total Operating Revenues1,749
 1,728
 1,737
 21
 (9)
Operating Expenses         
Operation         
Fuel490
 534
 561
 (44) (27)
Energy purchases18
 18
 23
 
 (5)
Energy purchases from affiliates24
 37
 88
 (13) (51)
Other operation and maintenance424
 435
 408
 (11) 27
Depreciation234
 220
 197
 14
 23
Taxes, other than income30
 29
 27
 1
 2
Total Operating Expenses1,220
 1,273
 1,304
 (53) (31)
Other Income (Expense) - net(5) 1
 (1) (6) 2
Interest Expense96
 82
 77
 14
 5
Income Taxes163
 140
 135
 23
 5
Net Income$265
 $234
 $220
 $31
 $14

Table of Contents

       Change
 2017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Operating Revenues         
Retail and wholesale$1,734
 $1,735
 $1,708
 $(1) $27
Electric revenue from affiliate10
 14
 20
 (4) (6)
Total Operating Revenues1,744
 1,749
 1,728
 (5) 21
Operating Expenses         
Operation         
Fuel467
 490
 534
 (23) (44)
Energy purchases18
 18
 18
 
 
Energy purchases from affiliates31
 24
 37
 7
 (13)
Other operation and maintenance424
 424
 435
 
 (11)
Depreciation255
 234
 220
 21
 14
Taxes, other than income32
 30
 29
 2
 1
Total Operating Expenses1,227
 1,220
 1,273
 7
 (53)
Other Income (Expense) - net(3) (5) 1
 2
 (6)
Interest Expense96
 96
 82
 
 14
Income Taxes159
 163
 140
 (4) 23
Net Income$259
 $265
 $234
 $(6) $31

Operating Revenue

The increase (decrease) in operating revenue was due to:
2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Base rates$64
 $61
$26
 $64
Volumes(a)(8) (28)(48) (8)
Fuel and other energy prices (a)(b)(47) (68)8
 (47)
ECR13
 35
5
 13
Other(1) (9)4
 (1)
Total$21
 $(9)$(5) $21

(a)DecreasesDecrease in 2017 compared with 2016 was primarily due to milder weather in 2017.
(b)Decrease in 2016 compared with 2015 was due to lower recoveries of fuel and energy purchases due to lower commodity costs as described below.costs.

Fuel

Fuel decreased $23 million in 2017 compared with 2016 primarily due to a $31 million decrease in fuel usage driven by milder weather in 2017, partially offset by an $8 million increase in market prices for natural gas.
Fuel decreased $44 million in 2016 compared with 2015 primarily due to a $46 million decrease in commodity costs as a result of a decrease in market prices for coal and natural gas.
Fuel decreased $27 million in 2015 compared with 2014 due to a $35 million decrease in commodity costs, as a result of a decrease in market prices for coal, partially offset by an $8 million increase in natural gas volumes driven by Cane Run Unit 7 being placed in-service in June 2015.

Energy Purchases from Affiliate

Energy purchases from affiliate decreased $13 million in 2016 compared with 2015 primarily due to decreased volumes driven by milder weather in the first quarter of 2016.

Energy purchases from affiliate decreased $51 million in 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due to decreased volumes driven by Cane Run Unit 7 being placed in-service in June 2015.

Other Operation and Maintenance

The increase (decrease) in other operation and maintenance was due to:
 2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 2014
Timing and scope of scheduled generation maintenance outages$(8) $2
Pension expense(8) 10
Plant operations and maintenance2
 10
Bad debts(1) (3)
Storm costs(1) (3)
Energy efficiency programs3
 
Other2
 11
Total$(11) $27
Depreciation
 
Depreciation increased $14$21 million in 20162017 compared with 2015 and increased $23 million in 2015 compared with 20142016 primarily due to additional assets placed into service,an $11 million increase related to higher depreciation rates effective July 1, 2017, and a $9 million increase related to additions to PP&E, net of retirements.



65


Table of Contents


Income Taxes
 
Income taxes increased $23 million in 2016 compared with 2015 and increased $5 million in 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due to higher pre-tax income.income at current period tax rates.

See Note 5 to the Financial Statements for additional information on income taxes.


Table of Contents

Earnings
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Net Income$265
 $234
 $220
$259
 $265
 $234
Special items, gains (losses), after tax (a)
 
 
(1) 
 

(a)There are no items management considers special for the periods presented.
Excluding special items, earnings in 2017 compared with 2016 decreased primarily due to lower electricity sales volumes driven by milder weather in 2017 and higher depreciation expense, partially offset by higher base electricity rates effective July 1, 2017.

EarningsExcluding special items, earnings in 2016 compared with 2015 increased primarily due to higher base electricity rates effective July 1, 2015 and lower other operation and maintenance expense partially offset by higher interest expense.

Earnings in 2015 compared with 2014 increased primarily due to higher base rates and returns on additional environmental capital investments partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expense, depreciation expense and lower sales volume. The increases in base rates were the result of new rates approved by the KPSC effective July 1, 2015. The change in sales volume was due to milder weather during the fourth quarter of 2015.
 
The table below quantifies the changes in the components of Net Income between these periods, which reflect amounts classified as Margins on separate line and not in their respective Statement of Income line items.
2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Margins$63
 $54
$6
 $63
Other operation and maintenance19
 (21)
 19
Depreciation(7) (10)(16) (7)
Taxes, Other than income(1) (1)(2) (1)
Other Income (Expense) - net(6) 2
3
 (6)
Interest Expense(14) (5)
 (14)
Income Taxes(23) (5)4
 (23)
Special items, gains (losses), after-tax (a)(1) 
Net Income$31
 $14
$(6) $31
 
(a)See PPL's "Results of Operations - Segment Earnings - Kentucky Regulated Segment" for details of the special item.

Margins
 
"Margins" is a non-GAAP financial performance measure that management utilizes as an indicator of the performance of its business. See PPL's "Results of Operations - Margins" for an explanation of why management believes this measure is useful and the factors underlying changes between periods. Within PPL's discussion, KU's Margins are included in "Kentucky Gross Margins."
 
The following tables contain the components from the Statements of Income that are included in this non-GAAP financial measure and a reconciliation to "Operating Income."
2016 20152017 2016
Margins Other (a) Operating
Income (b)
 Margins Other (a) Operating
Income (b)
Margins Other (a) Operating
Income (b)
 Margins Other (a) Operating
Income (b)
Operating Revenues$1,749
 $
 $1,749
 $1,728
 $
 $1,728
$1,744
 $
 $1,744
 $1,749
 $
 $1,749
Operating Expenses                      
Fuel490
 
 490
 534
 
 534
467
 
 467
 490
 
 490
Energy purchases42
 
 42
 55
 
 55
49
 
 49
 42
 
 42
Other operation and maintenance66
 358
 424
 58
 377
 435
66
 358
 424
 66
 358
 424
Depreciation27
 207
 234
 20
 200
 220
32
 223
 255
 27
 207
 234
Taxes, other than income2
 28
 30
 2
 27
 29
2
 30
 32
 2
 28
 30
Total Operating Expenses627
 593
 1,220
 669
 604
 1,273
616
 611
 1,227
 627
 593
 1,220
Total $1,122
 $(593) $529
 $1,059
 $(604) $455
$1,128
 $(611) $517
 $1,122
 $(593) $529


66


Table of Contents


20142015
Margins Other (a) Operating
Income (b)
Margins Other (a) Operating
Income (b)
Operating Revenues$1,737
 $
 $1,737
$1,728
 $
 $1,728
Operating Expenses          
Fuel561
 
 561
534
 
 534
Energy purchases111
 
 111
55
 
 55
Other operation and maintenance52
 356
 408
58
 377
 435
Depreciation7
 190
 197
20
 200
 220
Taxes, other than income1
 26
 27
2
 27
 29
Total Operating Expenses732
 572
 1,304
669
 604
 1,273
Total $1,005
 $(572) $433
$1,059
 $(604) $455
 
(a)Represents amounts excluded from Margins.
(b)As reported on the Statements of Income.
 
Financial Condition
 
The remainder of this Item 7 in this Form 10-K is presented on a combined basis, providing information, as applicable, for all Registrants.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
(All Registrants)
 
The Registrants' cash flows from operations and access to cost effective bank and capital markets are subject to risks and uncertainties. See "Item 1A. Risk Factors" for a discussion of risks and uncertainties that could affect the Registrants' cash flows.
 
The Registrants had the following at: 
PPL (a) 
PPL
Electric
 LKE LG&E KU
December 31, 2017 
  
  
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents$485
 $49
 $30
 $15
 $15
Short-term debt1,080
 
 244
 199
 45
Long-term debt due within one year348
 
 98
 98
 
Notes payable with affiliates  
 225
 
 
PPL (a) 
PPL
Electric
 LKE LG&E KU         
December 31, 2016 
  
  
  
  
 
    
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents$341
 $13
 $13
 $5
 $7
$341
 $13
 $13
 $5
 $7
Short-term debt923
 295
 185
 169
 16
923
 295
 185
 169
 16
Long-term debt due within one year518
 224
 194
 194
 
Notes payable with affiliates  
 163
 
 
  
 163
 
 
                  
December 31, 2015 
    
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents$836
 $47
 $30
 $19
 $11
$836
 $47
 $30
 $19
 $11
Short-term debt916
 
 265
 142
 48
916
 
 265
 142
 48
Notes payable with affiliates  
 54
 
 
         
December 31, 2014 
  
  
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents$1,399
 $214
 $21
 $10
 $11
Short-term investments120
 
 
 
 
Short-term debt836
 
 575
 264
 236
Long-term debt due within one year485
 
 25
 25
 
Notes payables with affiliates  
 41
 
 
  
 54
 
 
 
(a)At December 31, 2016, $52017, $58 million of cash and cash equivalents were denominated in GBP. If these amounts would be remitted as dividends, PPL would not anticipate a materialan incremental U.S. tax cost. Historically, dividends paid by foreign subsidiaries have been limited to distributions of the current year's earnings. See Note 5 to the Financial Statements for additional information on undistributed earnings of WPD.

(PPL)
 
The Statements of Cash Flows separately report the cash flows of the discontinued operations. The "Operating Activities",Activities," "Investing Activities" and "Financing Activities" sections below include only the cash flows of continuing operations.



67


Table of Contents


(All Registrants)
 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating, investing and financing activities for the years ended December 31 and the changes between periods were as follows. 
PPL 
PPL
Electric
 LKE LG&E KU
2017         
Operating activities$2,461
 $880
 $1,099
 $512
 $634
Investing activities(3,156) (1,252) (888) (458) (428)
Financing activities824
 408
 (194) (44) (198)
PPL 
PPL
Electric
 LKE LG&E KU         
2016                  
Operating activities$2,890
 $872
 $1,027
 $482
 $606
$2,890
 $872
 $1,027
 $482
 $606
Investing activities(2,918) (1,130) (790) (439) (349)(2,918) (1,130) (790) (439) (349)
Financing activities(439) 224
 (254) (57) (261)(439) 224
 (254) (57) (261)
                  
2015                  
Operating activities$2,272
 $602
 $1,063
 $554
 $608
$2,272
 $602
 $1,063
 $554
 $608
Investing activities(3,439) (1,108) (1,203) (689) (512)(3,439) (1,108) (1,203) (689) (512)
Financing activities482
 339
 149
 144
 (96)482
 339
 149
 144
 (96)
                  
2014         
2017 vs. 2016 Change         
Operating activities$2,941
 $613
 $999
 $371
 $566
$(429) $8
 $72
 $30
 $28
Investing activities(3,826) (791) (1,191) (656) (603)(238) (122) (98) (19) (79)
Financing activities262
 367
 178
 287
 27
1,263
 184
 60
 13
 63
                  
2016 vs. 2015 Change                  
Operating activities$618
 $270
 $(36) $(72) $(2)$618
 $270
 $(36) $(72) $(2)
Investing activities521
 (22) 413
 250
 163
521
 (22) 413
 250
 163
Financing activities(921) (115) (403) (201) (165)(921) (115) (403) (201) (165)
         
2015 vs. 2014 Change         
Operating activities$(669) $(11) $64
 $183
 $42
Investing activities387
 (317) (12) (33) 91
Financing activities220
 (28) (29) (143) (123)
 
Operating Activities
 
The components of the change in cash provided by (used in) operating activities were as follows. 
PPL 
PPL
Electric
 LKE LG&E KU
2017 vs. 2016         
Change - Cash Provided (Used):         
Net income$(774) $22
 $(113) $10
 $(6)
Non-cash components363
 100
 31
 (8) 42
Working capital38
 (87) 93
 (33) (14)
Defined benefit plan funding(138) (24) 50
 42
 (3)
Other operating activities82
 (3) 11
 19
 9
Total$(429) $8
 $72
 $30
 $28
PPL 
PPL
Electric
 LKE LG&E KU         
2016 vs. 2015                  
Change - Cash Provided (Used):                  
Net income$299
 $88
 $65
 $18
 $31
$299
 $88
 $65
 $18
 $31
Non-cash components195
 40
 66
 20
 (20)195
 40
 66
 20
 (20)
Working capital47
 101
 (206) (100) (51)47
 101
 (206) (100) (51)
Defined benefit plan funding72
 33
 (15) (20) 1
72
 33
 (15) (20) 1
Other operating activities5
 8
 54
 10
 37
5
 8
 54
 10
 37
Total$618
 $270
 $(36) $(72) $(2)$618
 $270
 $(36) $(72) $(2)
         
2015 vs. 2014         
Change - Cash Provided (Used):         
Net income$166
 $(11) $20
 $16
 $14
Non-cash components(280) 181
 (184) 21
 (52)
Working capital(341) (148) 335
 190
 152
Defined benefit plan funding(115) (10) (25) (13) (16)
Other operating activities(99) (23) (82) (31) (56)
Total$(669) $(11) $64
 $183
 $42


68


Table of Contents



(PPL)
 
PPL had a $429 million decrease in cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations in 2017 compared with 2016.
Net income declined $774 million between periods and included net non-cash benefits of $363 million. The increase in net non-cash benefits was primarily due to an increase in unrealized losses on hedging activities, an increase in deferred income taxes (primarily due to the impact of the TCJA) and an increase in depreciation expense (primarily due to additional assets placed into service, net of retirements, and higher depreciation rates at LG&E and KU effective July 1, 2017, partially offset by the impact of foreign currency at WPD), partially offset by an increase in the U.K. net periodic defined benefit credits (primarily due to a decrease in the U.K. pension plan discount rates used to calculate the interest cost component of the net periodic defined benefit costs (credits) and increase in expected returns).

The $38 million increase in cash from changes in working capital was primarily due a decrease in net regulatory assets and liabilities (due to timing of rate recovery mechanisms), a decrease in fuel, materials and supplies (primarily due to a decrease in fuel purchases due to lower generation driven by milder weather in 2017 compared to 2016) and a decrease in unbilled revenue (primarily due to lower growth in volumes in 2017 compared to 2016), partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable (due to timing of payments), a decrease in taxes payable (primarily due to the timing of payments) and an increase in accounts receivable.

Defined benefit plan funding was $138 million higher in 2017. The increase was primarily due to the acceleration of WPD's contributions to its U.K. pension plans.

PPL had a $618 million increase in cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations in 2016 compared with 2015.
Net income improved by $299 million between the periods. This included an additional $195 million of net non-cash charges,benefits, including a $132 million increase in deferred income taxes and $96 million of lower unrealized gains on hedging activity (primarily due to the settlement of hedges in the third quarter of 2016) partially offset by a $96 million increase in defined benefit plan income (primarily due to an increase in estimated returns on higher asset balances and lower interest costs due to a change in the discount rate for the U.K. pension plans).

The $47 million increase in cash from changes in working capital was primarily due to an increase in taxes payable (due to timing of payments) and an increase in accounts payable (primarily due to timing of payments), partially offset by an increase in unbilled revenues (primarily due to favorable weather compared to December 2015), an increase in net regulatory assets/liabilities (due to timing of rate recovery mechanisms) and an increase in accounts receivable (primarily due to increased volumes and favorable weather in 2016).

Defined benefit plan funding was $72 million lower in 2016.

(PPL Electric)

PPL Electric had a $669an $8 million decreaseincrease in cash fromprovided by operating activities from continuing operations in 20152017 compared with 2014.2016.
Net income improved by $166$22 million between the periods, butperiods. This included a decrease inan additional $100 million of net non-cash chargesbenefits primarily due to a $56 million increase in depreciation expense (primarily due to additional assets placed into service, related to the ongoing efforts to ensure the reliability of $280 million. Thesethe delivery system and the replacement of aging infrastructure as well as the roll-out of the Act 129 Smart Meter program, net non-cash charges includedof retirements) and a $238$37 million decreaseincrease in deferred income taxes and $65 million of changes to the WPD line loss accrual. These decreases in non-cash charges were partially offset by $110 million of lower unrealized gains on hedging activities. The net $114 million decrease from net income and non-cash adjustments between the periods was primarily(primarily due to lower margins from the U.K. Regulated segment, partially offset by higher margins from the Kentucky and Pennsylvania Regulated segments.book versus tax plant timing differences).

The $341$87 million decrease in cash from changes in working capital was primarily due to a decreasean increase in taxes payableaccounts receivable (primarily due to a decrease in current2017 federal income tax expense in 2015) andbenefit refund, not yet received), a decrease in accounts payable (primarily due to timing of fuel purchasespayments) and payments and unfavorable weatheran increase in 2015)prepayments (primarily due to an increase in the 2017 gross receipts tax prepayment compared to 2016), partially offset by an decrease in net regulatory assets and liabilities (due to timing of rate recovery mechanisms) and a decrease in accounts receivableunbilled revenue (primarily due to unfavorable weatherlower growth in 2015)volumes in 2017 compared to 2016).

The $99Pension funding was $24 million decreasehigher in cash provided by other operating activities was primarily2017 due to payments of $101 million forcontributions made in 2017 to the settlement in 2015 of forward starting interest rate swaps.PPL Retirement Plan.

(PPL Electric)

69


Table of Contents


PPL Electric had aan $270 million increase in cash provided by operating activities in 2016 compared with 2015.
Net income improved by $88 million between the periods. This included an additional $40 million of net non-cash benefits primarily due to a $39 million increase in depreciation expense (primarily due to the replacement of aging infrastructure and to ensure system reliability).

The $101 million increase in cash from changes in working capital was primarily due to an increase in accounts payable (primarily due to timing of payments), an increase in taxes payable (primarily due to timing of payments) and a decrease in prepayments (primarily due to higher tax payments in 2015), partially offset by an increase in net regulatory assets and liabilities (due to timing of rate recovery mechanisms), an increase in unbilled revenues (primarily due to higher volumes and favorable weather compared to December 2015) and an increase in accounts receivable.

Pension funding was $33 million lower in 2016.

PPL Electric(LKE)
LKE had an $11a $72 million decreaseincrease in cash provided by operating activities in 20152017 compared with 2014.2016.
Net income decreaseddeclined by $11$113 million between the periods and included an additional $181increase of $31 million of net non-cash charges primarily due to increasesa $35 million increase in depreciation expense and a $3 million increase in deferred income taxes due to the impact of the TCJA, largely offset by book versus tax expenseplant timing differences and depreciation.reduced benefit from net operating losses.

The $148 million decreaseincrease in cash from changes in working capital was partiallydriven primarily by an increase in other current liabilities due to customer advances and the timing of payments, a decrease in taxes payable (primarilyfuel purchases due to lower generation driven by milder weather in 2017 compared to 2016, an increase in current income tax benefits in 2015) and a decrease in accountstaxes payable (primarily due to milder weather and lower energy prices in December 2015),the timing of payments, partially offset by a decrease in accounts receivable (primarilypayable due to improved collection performance).

Tablethe timing of Contents
payments.


PensionDefined benefit plan funding was $10$50 million higherlower in 2015.2017.

(LKE)
LKE had a $36 million decrease in cash provided by operating activities in 2016 compared with 2015.
Net income improved by $65 million and included an increase of $66 million of net non-cash charges primarily due to a $55 million increase in deferred income taxes and a $22 million increase in depreciation expense.

The decrease in cash from changes in working capital was driven primarily by lower tax payments received from PPL for the use of prior year excess tax depreciation deductions. Other decreases in cash were related to accounts receivable and unbilled revenues due to more favorable weather in December 2016 compared to December 2015, and a decrease in taxes payable due to the timing of payments, partially offset by an increase in accounts payable due to the timing of fuel purchases and payments.

Defined benefit plan funding was $15 million higher in 2016.

The increase in cash from LKE's other operating activities was driven primarily by lower payments for the settlement of interest rate swaps, partially offset by an increase in ARO expenditures.

LKE(LG&E)
LG&E had a $64$30 million increase in cash provided by operating activities in 20152017 compared with 2014.2016.
LKE's non-cash componentsNet income improved by $10 million and included a decrease of $8 million of net income includednon-cash charges primarily due to a $213$21 million decrease in deferred income taxes largely due to book versus tax plant timing differences, partially offset by a $28$13 million increase in depreciation due to additional assets in service in 2015. Deferred income taxes were lower in 2015 as a large portion of the effect of accelerated tax depreciation did not result in cash as a result of the Federal net operating losses.expense.

The increasedecrease in cash from changes in working capital was driven primarily by a decrease in income tax receivable as a result of receiving payment from PPL in 2015 for the use of excess tax depreciation deductions in 2014, decreases in accounts receivablepayable and unbilled revenuestaxes payable due to milder weather in December 2015, a decrease in coal inventory as a resultthe timing of plant retirements, and a decrease in natural gas stored underground due to lower gas prices in 2015,payments, partially offset by a decrease in accounts payablereceivable from affiliates due to lower intercompany settlements associated with energy sales and inventory and an increase in other current liabilities due to customer advances and the timing of fuel purchases and payments.

Defined benefit plan funding was $42 million lower in 2017.

The decreaseincrease in cash from LKE'sLG&E's other operating activities was driven primarily by $88 million inlower payments for the settlement of interest rate swaps.

(LG&E)

70


Table of Contents



LG&E had a $72 million decrease in cash provided by operating activities in 2016 compared with 2015.
Net income improved by $18 million and included an increase of $20 million of net non-cash charges primarily due to a $21 million increase in deferred income taxes.

The decrease in cash from changes in working capital was driven primarily by lower tax payments received from LKE for the use of prior year excess tax depreciation deductions. Other decreases in cash were related to accounts receivable and unbilled revenues due to more favorable weather in December 2016 compared to December 2015, and an increase in accounts receivable from affiliates due to higher intercompany settlements associated with energy sales and inventory, partially offset by an increase in accounts payable due to the timing of fuel purchases and payments.

Defined benefit plan funding was $20 million higher in 2016.

The increase in cash from LG&E's other operating activities was driven primarily by lower payments for the settlement of interest rate swaps, partially offset by an increase in ARO expenditures.

LG&E(KU)
KU had a $183$28 million increase in cash provided by operating activities in 20152017 compared with 2014.2016.
LG&E's non-cash componentsNet income declined by $6 million and included an increase of $42 million of net income includednon-cash charges primarily due to an $8increase of $26 million increase in deferred income taxes largely due to the utilization of net operating losses and a $5an increase of $21 million increase in depreciation due to additional assets in service in 2015.expense.

The increasedecrease in cash from changes in working capital was driven primarily by a decrease in income tax receivable as a resulttaxes payable due to the timing of receiving payment from LKE in 2015 for the use of excess tax depreciation deductions in 2014,payments and a decrease in accounts receivable frompayable to affiliates due to lower fuel costs for jointly owned units compared to an increase in the prior

Table of Contents

year, a decrease in accounts receivable due to milder weather in December 2015 compared to an increase in the prior year, a decrease in coalintercompany settlements associated with energy purchases and inventory, as a result of the retirement of Cane Run coal units, and a decrease in natural gas stored underground due to lower gas prices in 2015, partially offset by a decrease in fuel purchases due to lower generation driven by milder weather in 2017 compared to 2016 and an increase in accounts payable due to the timing of fuel purchases and payments compared to an increase in the prior year.payments.

The decrease in cash from LG&E's other operating activities was driven primarily by $44 million in payments for the settlement of interest rate swaps.

(KU)
KU had a $2 million decrease in cash provided by operating activities in 2016 compared with 2015.
Net income improved by $31 million and included a decrease of $20 million of net non-cash charges primarily due to a $34 million decrease in deferred income taxes, partially offset by a $14 million increase in depreciation expense.

The decrease in cash from changes in working capital was driven primarily by lower tax payments received from LKE for the use of prior year excess tax depreciation deductions. Other decreases in cash were related to accounts receivable and unbilled revenues due to more favorable weather in December 2016 compared to December 2015, partially offset by an increase in accounts payable to affiliates due to higher intercompany settlements associated with energy purchases and inventory, and an increase in taxes payable due to the timing of payments.

The increase in cash from KU's other operating activities was driven primarily by lower payments for the settlement of interest rate swaps, partially offset by an increase in ARO expenditures.

KU had a $42 million increase in cash provided by operating activities in 2015 compared with 2014.
KU's non-cash components of net income included a $64 million decrease in deferred income taxes, partially offset by a $23 million increase in depreciation due to additional assets in service in 2015. Deferred income taxes were lower in 2015 as a large portion of the effect of accelerated tax depreciation did not result in cash as a result of the Federal net operating losses.

The increase in cash from changes in working capital was driven primarily by a decrease in income tax receivable as a result of receiving payment from LKE in 2015 for the use of excess tax depreciation deductions in 2014, a decrease in coal inventory as a result of the retirement of Green River coal units, and decreases in accounts receivable and unbilled revenues due to milder weather in December 2015, partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable to affiliates compared to an increase in the prior year due to lower fuel costs for jointly owned units and a decrease in accounts payable due to the timing of fuel purchases and payments.

The decrease in cash from KU's other operating activities was driven primarily by $44 million in payments for the settlement of interest rate swaps.

Investing Activities
 
(All Registrants)
 
The components of the change in cash provided by (used in) investing activities were as follows. 
PPL 
PPL
Electric
 LKE LG&E KUPPL 
PPL
Electric
 LKE LG&E KU
2016 vs. 2015         
2017 vs. 2016         
Change - Cash Provided (Used):                  
Expenditures for PP&E$613
 $(28) $419
 $250
 $169
$(213) $(119) $(101) $(19) $(82)
Investment activity, net(134) 
 
 
 
(2) 
 
 
 
Other investing activities42
 6
 (6) 
 (6)(23) (3) 3
 
 3
Total$521
 $(22) $413
 $250
 $163
$(238) $(122) $(98) $(19) $(79)
                  


71


Table of Contents


PPL 
PPL
Electric
 LKE LG&E KUPPL 
PPL
Electric
 LKE LG&E KU
2015 vs. 2014         
2016 vs. 2015         
Change - Cash Provided (Used):                  
Expenditures for PP&E$141
 $(166) $52
 $(33) $85
$613
 $(28) $419
 $250
 $169
Notes receivable with affiliates activity, net
 (150) (70) 
 
Restricted cash and cash equivalent activity(11) 
 
 
 
Investment activity, net256
 
 
 
 
(134) 
 
 
 
Other investing activities1
 (1) 6
 
 6
42
 6
 (6) 
 (6)
Total$387
 $(317) $(12) $(33) $91
$521
 $(22) $413
 $250
 $163
 
(PPL)For PPL, in 2017 compared with 2016, higher project expenditures at PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU were partially offset by lower project expenditures at WPD. The increase in project expenditures for PPL Electric was primarily due to an increase in capital spending related to the ongoing efforts to improve reliability and replace aging infrastructure, as well as the roll-out of the Act 129 Smart Meter program. The increase in expenditures for LKE, LG&E and KU was primarily due to increased spending for environmental water projects at LG&E’s Mill Creek plant, CCR projects at the Trimble County plant and increased spending on various transmission projects at KU, partially offset by lower spending driven by completion of environmental air projects. The decrease in expenditures at WPD was primarily due to a decrease in foreign currency exchange rates partially offset by an increase in expenditures to enhance system reliability.

For PPL, in 2016 compared with 2015, lower project expenditures at WPD, LKE, LG&E and KU were partially offset by higher project expenditures at PPL Electric. The decrease in expenditures for WPD was primarily due to a decrease in expenditures to enhance system reliability and a decrease in foreign currency exchange rates. The decrease in expenditures for LG&E was primarily driven by the completion of the environmental air projects at LG&E's Mill Creek Plant. The decrease in expenditures for KU was primarily driven by the completion of the environmental air projects at KU's Ghent plant and the CCR project at KU's E.W. Brown plant. The increase in expenditures for PPL Electric was primarily due to the Northern Lehigh and Greater Scranton transmission reliability projects and other various transmission and distribution projects, partially offset by the completion of the Northeast Pocono reliability project and Susquehanna-Roseland transmission project.

The change in "Investment activity, net" for 2016 compared with 2015 resulted from PPL receiving $136 million during 2015 for the sale of short-term investments.

For PPL, in 2015 compared with 2014, lower project expenditures at WPD and KU were partially offset by higher project expenditures at PPL Electric and LG&E. The decrease in expenditures for WPD was primarily due to a decrease in expenditures to enhance system reliability associated with the end of the DPCR5 price control period and changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The decrease in expenditures for KU was related to lower expenditures for the construction of Cane Run Unit 7 which was put into commercial operation in June 2015, and lower expenditures for environmental air projects and CCR projects at KU's Ghent and E.W. Brown plants. The increase in expenditures for PPL Electric was primarily due to the Northeast Pocono reliability project, smart grid projects and other various projects, partially offset by the completion of the Susquehanna-Roseland transmission project. The increase in expenditures for LG&E was primarily due to environmental air projects at LG&E's Mill Creek plant, partially offset by lower expenditures for the construction of Cane Run Unit 7.

The change in "Investment activity, net" for 2015 compared with 2014 resulted from PPL receiving $136 million during 2015 for the sale of short-term investments and paying $120 million during 2014 for the purchase of short-term investments.

(PPL Electric)
For PPL Electric, in 2016 compared with 2015, the increase in expenditures was primarily due to the Northern Lehigh and Greater Scranton transmission reliability projects and other various transmission and distribution projects, which was partially offset by the completion of the Northeast Pocono reliability project and the Susquehanna-Roseland transmission project.

For PPL Electric, in 2015 compared with 2014, the increase in expenditures was primarily due to the Northeast Pocono reliability project, smart grid projects and other various projects, partially offset by the completion of the Susquehanna-Roseland transmission project.

The changes in "Notes receivable with affiliates activity, net" resulted from proceeds of $150 million received in 2014 from repayments on a note extended in 2013.
(LKE)
For LKE, in 2016 compared with 2015, cash used in investing activities decreased primarily due to lower PP&E expenditures. The decrease in expenditures for LG&E was primarily driven by completion of the environmental air projects at LG&E's Mill Creek plant. The decrease in expenditures for KU was primarily driven by completion of the environmental air projects at KU's Ghent plant and the CCR project at KU's E.W. Brown plant.

Table of Contents

For LKE, in 2015 compared with 2014, cash used in investing activities increased as a result of receiving payment from PPL in 2014 for the notes receivable issued in 2013, partially offset by lower PP&E expenditures. An increase in expenditures for LG&E was primarily due to higher expenditures for environmental air projects at the Mill Creek plant, partially offset by lower expenditures for the construction of Cane Run Unit 7. A decrease in expenditures for KU was primarily due to lower expenditures for the construction of Cane Run Unit 7 which was put into commercial operation in June 2015, and lower expenditures for environmental air projects and CCR projects at the Ghent and the E.W. Brown plants.

(LG&E)
For LG&E, in 2016 compared with 2015, cash used in investing activities decreased due to lower PP&E expenditures driven by completion of the environmental air projects at the Mill Creek plant.
For LG&E, in 2015 compared with 2014, cash used in investing activities increased primarily due to higher expenditures for environmental air projects at the Mill Creek plant, partially offset by lower expenditures for the construction of Cane Run Unit 7 which was put into commercial operation in June 2015.

(KU)
For KU, in 2016 compared with 2015, cash used in investing activities decreased primarily due to lower PP&E expenditures driven by completion of the environmental air projects at the Ghent plant and the CCR project at the E.W. Brown plant.
For KU, in 2015 compared with 2014, cash used in investing activities decreased primarily due to lower expenditures for the construction of Cane Run Unit 7 which was put into commercial operation in June 2015, and lower expenditures for environmental air projects and CCR projects at the Ghent and the E.W. Brown plants.

(All Registrants)
 
See "Forecasted Uses of Cash" for detail regarding projected capital expenditures for the years 20162018 through 2020.2022.

Financing Activities

(All Registrants)
 
The components of the change in cash provided by (used in) financing activities were as follows. 
PPL 
PPL
Electric
 LKE LG&E KUPPL 
PPL
Electric
 LKE LG&E KU
2016 vs. 2015         
2017 vs. 2016         
Change - Cash Provided (Used):                  
Debt issuance/retirement, net$(824) $(248) $(175) $(325) $(250)$935
 $470
 $115
 $115
 $
Debt issuance/retirement, affiliate  
 (400) 
 
Stock issuances/redemptions, net(59) 
 
 
 
309
 
 
 
 
Dividends(26) (107) 
 (9) (95)(42) (48) 
 (64) 22
Capital contributions/distributions, net  (55) (161) (19) 20
  355
 (147) (41) (20)
Changes in net short-term debt (a)(65) 295
 326
 149
 156
86
 (590) 92
 3
 61
Other financing activities53
 
 7
 3
 4
(25) (3) 
 
 
Total$(921) $(115) $(403) $(201) $(165)$1,263
 $184
 $60
 $13
 $63


72
 PPL 
PPL
Electric
 LKE LG&E KU
2015 vs. 2014         
Change - Cash Provided (Used):         
Debt issuance/retirement, net$1,177
 $(38) $150
 $300
 $250
Debt issuance/retirement, affiliate  
 400
 
 
Stock issuances/redemptions, net(871) 
 
 
 
Dividends(37) (23) 
 (7) (5)
Capital contributions/distributions, net  12
 94
 (67) (91)
Changes in net short-term debt (a)(53) 20
 (668) (366) (274)
Other financing activities4
 1
 (5) (3) (3)
Total$220
 $(28) $(29) $(143) $(123)


Table of Contents


 PPL 
PPL
Electric
 LKE LG&E KU
2016 vs. 2015         
Change - Cash Provided (Used):         
Debt issuance/retirement, net$(824) $(248) $(175) $(325) $(250)
Debt issuance/retirement, affiliate  
 (400) 
 
Stock issuances/redemptions, net(59) 
 
 
 
Dividends(26) (107) 
 (9) (95)
Capital contributions/distributions, net  (55) (161) (19) 20
Changes in net short-term debt (a)(65) 295
 326
 149
 156
Other financing activities53
 
 7
 3
 4
Total$(921) $(115) $(403) $(201) $(165)
 
(a)Includes net increase (decrease) in notes payable with affiliates.

(PPL)
 
For PPL, in 2017 compared with 2016, cash provided by financing activities increased primarily as a result of an increase in cash required to fund capital and general corporate expenditures and a decrease in cash from operations of $429 million.

For PPL, in 2016 compared with 2015, $921 million less cash fromprovided by financing activities was requireddecreased primarily due to improvements in cash from operations of $618 million.

For PPL, in 2015 compared with 2014, $220 million additional cash from financing activities was required including the WPD, LG&E and KU long-term debt issuances in 2015, partially offset by lower common stock issuances in 2015.
 
(PPL Electric)
 
For PPL Electric, in 2017 compared with 2016, cash provided by financing activities increased primarily as a result of an increase in cash required to fund capital and general expenditures.

For PPL Electric, in 2016 compared with 2015, $115 million less cash fromprovided by financing activities was required to support its significant capital expenditure programdecreased primarily due to improvements in cash from operations of $270 million.

For PPL Electric, in 2015 compared with 2014, $28 million less cash from financing activities was required primarily due to the use of cash on hand which helped support the significant capital expenditure program.
(LKE)(LKE, LG&E and KU)
 
For LKE, LG&E and KU, in 20162017 compared with 2015,2016, cash provided by financing activities decreasedincreased primarily as a result of a decreasean increase in cash required to fund capital and general corporate expenditures.
 
For LKE, in 2015 compared with 2014, cash provided by financing activities decreased as a result of the repayment of short-term debt, partially offset by the $550 million of additional long-term debt issued by LG&E and KU in 2015 and lower distributions to PPL.
(LG&E)
For LG&E, in 2016 compared with 2015, cash provided by financing activities decreased primarily as a result of a decrease in cash required to fund capital and general corporate expenditures.
For LG&E, in 2015 compared with 2014, cash provided by financing activities decreased as a result of the repayment of short-term debt and lower capital contributions from LKE, partially offset by the $300 million of additional long-term debt issued in 2015.

(KU)
For KU, in 2016 compared with 2015, cash provided by financing activities decreased primarily as a result of a decrease in cash required to fund capital and general corporate expenditures.
For KU, in 2015 compared with 2014, cash provided by financing activities decreased as a result of the repayment of short-term debt and lower capital contributions from LKE, partially offset by the $250 million of additional long-term debt issued in 2015.
 
(All Registrants)
 
See "Long-term Debt and Equity Securities" below for additional information on current year activity. See "Forecasted Sources of Cash" for a discussion of the Registrants' plans to issue debt and equity securities, as well as a discussion of credit facility capacity available to the Registrants. Also see "Forecasted Uses of Cash" for a discussion of PPL's plans to pay dividends on common securities in the future, as well as the Registrants' maturities of long-term debt.
 
Long-term Debt and Equity Securities
 
Long-term debt and equity securities activity for 20162017 included: 
 Debt Net Stock
 Issuances (a) Retirements Issuances
Cash Flow Impact:     
PPL$1,515
 $168
 $453
PPL Electric   470
 
  
LKE160
 70
  
LG&E160
 70
  
KU
 
  


73


Table of Contents


 Debt Net Stock
 Issuances (a) Retirements Issuances
Cash Flow Impact:     
PPL$1,342
 $930
 $144
PPL Electric   224
 224
  
LKE221
 246
  
LG&E125
 150
  
KU96
 96
  
(a)Issuances are net of pricing discounts, where applicable, and exclude the impact of debt issuance costs.

See Note 7 to the Financial Statements for additional information about long-term debt.

ATM Program (PPL)
 
During 2016,2017, PPL issued 71010,373 thousand shares of common stock under the program, at an average price of $35.23 per share, receiving net proceeds of $25$377 million. The compensation paid to the selling agents by PPL may be up to 1% of the gross offering proceeds of the shares sold with respect to each equity distribution agreement. See Note 7 to the Financial Statements for additional information about the ATM Program.

Forecasted Sources of Cash
 
(All Registrants)
 
The Registrants expect to continue to have adequate liquidity available from operating cash flows, cash and cash equivalents, credit facilities and commercial paper issuances. Additionally, subject to market conditions, the Registrants and their subsidiaries may access the capital markets, and PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU anticipate receiving equity contributions from their parent or member in 2017.2018.
 
Credit Facilities
 
The Registrants maintain credit facilities to enhance liquidity, provide credit support and provide a backstop to commercial paper programs. Amounts borrowed under these credit facilities are reflected in "Short-term debt" on the Balance Sheets except for borrowings under LG&E's term loan agreement which are reflected in "Long-term debt" on the Balance Sheets. At December 31, 2016,2017, the total committed borrowing capacity under credit facilities and the use of this borrowing capacityborrowings under these facilities were:

External
Committed Capacity Borrowed 
Letters of
Credit
and
Commercial
Paper
Issued
 
Unused
Capacity
Committed Capacity Borrowed 
Letters of
Credit
and
Commercial
Paper
Issued
 
Unused
Capacity
PPL Capital Funding Credit Facilities$1,400
 $
 $37
 $1,363
$1,400
 $
 $248
 $1,152
PPL Electric Credit Facility650
 
 296
 354
650
 
 1
 649
              
LKE Credit Facility75
 
 
 75
75
 
 
 75
LG&E Credit Facility500
 
 169
 331
LG&E Credit Facilities700
 100
 199
 401
KU Credit Facilities598
 
 214
 384
598
 
 243
 355
Total LKE Consolidated1,173
 
 383
 790
1,373
 100
 442
 831
Total U.S. Credit Facilities (a) (b) (c)$3,223
 $
 $716
 $2,507
Total U.S. Credit Facilities (a) (b)$3,423
 $100
 $691
 $2,632
              
Total U.K. Credit Facilities (c) (d) (e)£1,055
 £279
 £
 £775
Total U.K. Credit Facilities (b) (c)£1,055
 £448
 £
 £605
 
(a)The syndicated credit facilities, as well as KU's letter of credit facility, each contain a financial covenant requiring debt to total capitalization not to exceed 70% for PPL Capital Funding, PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU, as calculated in accordance with the facility, and other customary covenants.

The commitments under the domestic credit facilities are provided by a diverse bank group, with no one bank and its affiliates providing an aggregate commitment of more than the following percentages of the total committed capacity: PPL - 10%, PPL Electric 7%, LKE - 18%, LG&E - 33% and KU - 37%.
(b)The commitments under the domestic credit facilities are provided by a diverse bank group, with no one bank and its affiliates providing an aggregate commitment of more than the following percentages of the total committed capacity: PPL - 10%, PPL Electric 7%, LKE - 21%, LG&E - 7% and KU - 37%.
(c)Each company pays customary fees under its respective syndicated credit facility, as does LG&E under its term loan agreement and KU under its letter of credit facility, and borrowingsfacility. Borrowings generally bear interest at LIBOR-based rates plus an applicable margin.
(d)(c)The facilities contain financial covenants to maintain an interest coverage ratio of not less than 3.0 times consolidated earnings before income taxes, depreciation and amortization and total net debt not in excess of 85% of its RAV, calculated in accordance with the credit facility.

TableThe amounts borrowed at December 31, 2017, include a USD-denominated borrowing of Contents$200 million and GBP-denominated borrowings of £300 million, which equated to $406 million. The unused capacity reflects the USD-denominated amount borrowed in GBP of £150 million as of the date borrowed. At December 31, 2017, the USD equivalent of unused capacity under the U.K. committed credit facilities was $819 million.

(e)The amounts borrowed at December 31, 2016, include a USD-denominated borrowing of $200 million and GBP-denominated borrowings of £119 million, which equated to $148 million. The unused capacity reflects the USD-denominated amount borrowed in GBP of £161 million as of the date borrowed. At December 31, 2016, the USD equivalent of unused capacity under the U.K. committed credit facilities was $969 million.

The commitments under the U.K.'s credit facilities are provided by a diverse bank group with no one bank providing more than 13%20% of the total committed capacity.



74


Table of Contents


In addition to the financial covenants noted in the table above, the credit agreements governing the above credit facilities contain various other covenants. Failure to comply with the covenants after applicable grace periods could result in acceleration of repayment of borrowings and/or termination of the agreements. The Registrants monitor compliance with the covenants on a regular basis. At December 31, 2016,2017, the Registrants were in compliance with these covenants. At this time, the Registrants believe that these covenants and other borrowing conditions will not limit access to these funding sources.
 
See Note 7 to the Financial Statements for further discussion of the Registrants' credit facilities.
 
Intercompany (LKE, LG&E and KU) 
Committed
Capacity
 Borrowed 
Other Used
Capacity
 
Unused
Capacity
Committed
Capacity
 Borrowed 
Non-affiliate Used
Capacity
 
Unused
Capacity
LKE Credit Facility$225
 $163
 $
 $62
$275
 $225
 $
 $50
LG&E Money Pool (a)500
 
 169
 331
500
 
 199
 301
KU Money Pool (a)500
 
 16
 484
500
 
 45
 455
 
(a)LG&E and KU participate in an intercompany agreement whereby LKE, LG&E and/or KU make available funds up to $500 million at an interest rate based on a market index of commercial paper issues. However, the FERC has authorized a maximum aggregate short-term debt limit for each utility at $500 million from all covered sources.

See Note 14 to the Financial Statements for further discussion of intercompany credit facilities.

Commercial Paper (All Registrants)
 
PPL, PPL Electric, LG&E and KU maintain commercial paper programs to provide an additional financing source to fund short-term liquidity needs, as necessary. Commercial paper issuances, included in "Short-term debt" on the Balance Sheets, are supported by the respective Registrant's Syndicated Credit Facility. The following commercial paper programs were in place at:

December 31, 2016December 31, 2017
Capacity 
Commercial
Paper
Issuances
 
Unused
Capacity
Capacity 
Commercial
Paper
Issuances
 
Unused
Capacity
PPL Capital Funding$1,000
 $20
 $980
$1,000
 $230
 $770
PPL Electric400
 295
 105
650
 
 650
          
LG&E350
 169
 181
350
 199
 151
KU350
 16
 334
350
 45
 305
Total LKE700
 185
 515
700
 244
 456
Total PPL$2,100
 $500
 $1,600
$2,350
 $474
 $1,876

In January 2017, PPL Electric's commercial paper program capacity was increased to $650 million.

See Note 7 to the Financial Statements for further discussion of the Registrants' commercial paper programs.
Long-term Debt and Equity Securities
 
(PPL)
 
PPL and its subsidiaries are currently authorized to incur, subject to market conditions, up to approximately $3.4$3.2 billion of long-term indebtedness in 2017,2018, the proceeds of which would be used to fund capital expenditures and for general corporate purposes.

PPL plansis authorized to issue, subject to market conditions, up to $350 million$3.5 billion of common stock in 2017.equity over three years.
 

Table of Contents

(PPL Electric)
 
PPL Electric is currently authorized to incur, subject to market conditions, up to approximately $500$650 million of long-term indebtedness in 2017,2018, the proceeds of which would be used to fund capital expenditures and for general corporate purposes. PPL Electric currently plans to remarket, subject to market conditions, $224 million of its bonds with put dates in 2017.
 
(LKE, LG&E and KU)
 
LG&E is currently authorized to incur, subject to market conditions and regulatory approvals, up to approximately $400$200 million of long-term indebtedness in 2017, the proceeds2018, of which $100 million was issued in January 2018. The proceeds would be used to fund capital expenditures and for general corporate purposes. LG&E currently plans to remarket, subject to market conditions, $194$98 million of its bondsPollution Control Bonds with put dates in 2017.2018.


75


Table of Contents



KU is currently authorized to incur, subject to market conditions and regulatory approvals, up to approximately $100 million of long-term indebtedness in 2017,2018, the proceeds of which would be used to fund capital expenditures.
 
Contributions from Parent/Member (PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU)
 
From time to time, LKE's member or the parents of PPL Electric, LG&E and KU make capital contributions to subsidiaries. The proceeds from these contributions are used to fund capital expenditures and for other general corporate purposes and, in the case of LKE, to make contributions to its subsidiaries.
 
Forecasted Uses of Cash
 
(All Registrants)
 
In addition to expenditures required for normal operating activities, such as purchased power, payroll, fuel and taxes, the Registrants currently expect to incur future cash outflows for capital expenditures, various contractual obligations, payment of dividends on its common stock, distributions by LKE to its member, and possibly the purchase or redemption of a portion of debt securities.
 
Capital Expenditures
 
The table below shows the Registrants' current capital expenditure projections for the years 20172018 through 2021.2022. Expenditures for the domestic regulated utilities are expected to be recovered through rates, pending regulatory approval.

  Projected  Projected
Total 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021Total 2018 (b) 2019 2020 2021 2022
PPL                      
Construction expenditures (a) (b) 
  
    
    
Construction expenditures (a) 
  
    
    
Generating facilities$862
 $220
 $212
 $195
 $97
 $138
$892
 $238
 $253
 $124
 $204
 $73
Distribution facilities8,849
 1,855
 1,743
 1,761
 1,732
 1,758
9,244
 1,875
 1,819
 1,851
 1,863
 1,836
Transmission facilities4,077
 900
 881
 875
 859
 562
3,771
 902
 854
 883
 628
 504
Environmental1,435
 329
 438
 210
 220
 238
828
 429
 191
 91
 62
 55
Other664
 137
 215
 189
 66
 57
685
 127
 201
 193
 117
 47
Total Capital Expenditures$15,887

$3,441
 $3,489
 $3,230
 $2,974
 $2,753
$15,420

$3,571
 $3,318
 $3,142
 $2,874
 $2,515
                      
PPL Electric (a) (b)
           
PPL Electric (a)
           
Distribution facilities$1,908
 $434
 $389
 $390
 $348
 $347
$2,077
 $476
 $404
 $403
 $396
 $398
Transmission facilities3,283
 768
 737
 675
 704
 399
2,901
 757
 686
 692
 404
 362
Total Capital Expenditures$5,191

$1,202
 $1,126
 $1,065
 $1,052
 $746
$4,978

$1,233
 $1,090
 $1,095
 $800
 $760
           
LKE
           
Generating facilities$892
 $238
 $253
 $124
 $204
 $73
Distribution facilities1,699
 347
 388
 360
 338
 266
Transmission facilities870
 144
 169
 190
 225
 142
Environmental828
 429
 191
 91
 62
 55
Other663
 119
 196
 189
 114
 45
Total Capital Expenditures$4,952

$1,277
 $1,197
 $954
 $943
 $581
           
LG&E
 
  
  
  
  
  
Generating facilities$408
 $127
 $108
 $35
 $94
 $44
Distribution facilities1,084
 223
 265
 233
 210
 153
Transmission facilities161
 27
 36
 36
 40
 22
Environmental335
 176
 83
 38
 22
 16
Other331
 58
 97
 94
 58
 24
Total Capital Expenditures$2,319

$611
 $589
 $436
 $424
 $259


76


Table of Contents


  Projected  Projected
Total 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021Total 2018 (b) 2019 2020 2021 2022
                      
LKE (b)
           
KU
 
  
  
  
  
  
Generating facilities$862
 $220
 $212
 $195
 $97
 $138
$484
 $111
 $145
 $89
 $110
 $29
Distribution facilities1,652
 297
 339
 348
 325
 343
615
 124
 123
 127
 128
 113
Transmission facilities795
 132
 144
 200
 156
 163
709
 117
 133
 154
 185
 120
Environmental1,435
 329
 438
 210
 220
 238
493
 253
 108
 53
 40
 39
Other636
 129
 209
 184
 61
 53
332
 61
 99
 95
 56
 21
Total Capital Expenditures$5,380

$1,107
 $1,342
 $1,137
 $859
 $935
$2,633

$666
 $608
 $518
 $519
 $322
           
LG&E (b)
 
  
  
  
  
  
Generating facilities$422
 $138
 $104
 $81
 $36
 $63
Distribution facilities1,090
 188
 223
 228
 216
 235
Transmission facilities222
 24
 32
 74
 43
 49
Environmental645
 150
 201
 78
 95
 121
Other310
 60
 102
 92
 28
 28
Total Capital Expenditures$2,689

$560
 $662
 $553
 $418
 $496
           
KU (b)
 
  
  
  
  
  
Generating facilities$440
 $82
 $108
 $114
 $61
 $75
Distribution facilities562
 109
 116
 120
 109
 108
Transmission facilities573
 109
 112
 126
 113
 113
Environmental789
 178
 237
 131
 126
 117
Other328
 69
 106
 94
 32
 27
Total Capital Expenditures$2,692

$547
 $679
 $585
 $441
 $440
 

(a)Construction expenditures include capitalized interest and AFUDC, which are expected to total approximately $86$84 million for PPL and $67$62 million for PPL Electric.
(b)The 20172018 total excludes amounts included in accounts payable as of December 31, 2016.2017.

Capital expenditure plans are revised periodically to reflect changes in operational, market and regulatory conditions. For the years presented, this table includes PPL Electric's asset optimization program to replace aging transmission and distribution assets. This table also includes LKE's environmental projects related to existing and proposed EPA compliance standards excluding the Clean Power Plan (actual costs may be significantly lower or higher depending on the final requirements and market conditions; most environmental compliance costs incurred by LG&E and KU in serving KPSC jurisdictional customers are generally eligible for recovery through the ECR mechanism). See Note 6 to the Financial Statements for information on LG&E's and KU's ECR mechanism and CPCN filing.

In addition to cash on hand and cash from operations, the Registrants plan to fund capital expenditures in 20172018 with proceeds from the sources noted below. 
Source PPL PPL Electric LKE LG&E KU
Issuance of common stock X        
Issuance of long-term debt securities X X X X X
Equity contributions from parent/member   X X X X
Short-term debt X X X X X

X = Expected funding source.


Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations
 
The Registrants have assumed various financial obligations and commitments in the ordinary course of conducting business. At December 31, 2016,2017, estimated contractual cash obligations were as follows:
Total 2017 2018 - 2019 2020 - 2021 After 2021Total 2018 2019 - 2020 2021 - 2022 After 2022
PPL                  
Long-term Debt (a)$18,399
 $518
 $484
 $2,412
 $14,985
$20,282
 $348
 $1,708
 $2,424
 $15,802
Interest on Long-term Debt (b)14,556
 808
 1,577
 1,502
 10,669
15,318
 868
 1,723
 1,529
 11,198
Operating Leases (c)118
 31
 42
 19
 26
96
 28
 27
 16
 25
Purchase Obligations (d)3,596
 1,050
 1,179
 579
 788
3,636
 1,121
 1,374
 563
 578
Other Long-term Liabilities Reflected on the Balance Sheet (e)878
 377
 428
 73
 
565
 293
 272
 
 
Total Contractual Cash Obligations$37,547

$2,784

$3,710

$4,585

$26,468
$39,897

$2,658

$5,104

$4,532

$27,603
                  
PPL Electric                   
Long-term Debt (a)$2,864
 $224
 $
 $500
 $2,140
$3,339
 $
 $100
 $874
 $2,365
Interest on Long-term Debt (b)2,441
 120
 237
 232
 1,852
2,894
 141
 282
 260
 2,211
Unconditional Power Purchase Obligations106
 24
 48
 34
 
77
 23
 45
 9
 
Total Contractual Cash Obligations$5,411

$368

$285

$766

$3,992
$6,310

$164

$427

$1,143

$4,576
         
LKE         
Long-term Debt (a)$5,110
 $194
 $234
 $1,225
 $3,457
Interest on Long-term Debt (b)3,336
 196
 389
 350
 2,401
Operating Leases (c)93
 24
 35
 15
 19
Coal and Natural Gas Purchase Obligations (f)2,165
 575
 955
 409
 226
Unconditional Power Purchase Obligations (g)705
 29
 57
 58
 561
Construction Obligations (h)270
 258
 9
 2
 1
Pension Benefit Plan Obligations (e)18
 18
 
 
 
Other Obligations297
 111
 110
 76
 
Total Contractual Cash Obligations$11,994
 $1,405
 $1,789
 $2,135
 $6,665
         
LG&E         
Long-term Debt (a)$1,634
 $194
 $138
 $
 $1,302
Interest on Long-term Debt (b)1,257
 61
 118
 112
 966
Operating Leases (c)50
 15
 21
 6
 8
Coal and Natural Gas Purchase Obligations (f)912
 248
 416
 163
 85
Unconditional Power Purchase Obligations (g)488
 20
 39
 40
 389
Construction Obligations (h)147
 143
 3
 1
 
Other Obligations138
 45
 53
 40
 
Total Contractual Cash Obligations$4,626
 $726
 $788
 $362
 $2,750
         
KU         
Long-term Debt (a)$2,351
 $
 $96
 $500
 $1,755
Interest on Long-term Debt (b)1,820
 92
 186
 170
 1,372
Operating Leases (c)42
 9
 14
 9
 10
Coal and Natural Gas Purchase Obligations (f)1,252
 327
 538
 246
 141
Unconditional Power Purchase Obligations (g)217
 9
 18
 18
 172
Construction Obligations (h)105
 102
 2
 1
 
Pension Benefit Plan Obligations (e)18
 18
 
 
 
Other Obligations117
 40
 45
 32
 
Total Contractual Cash Obligations$5,922
 $597
 $899
 $976
 $3,450


77


Table of Contents


 Total 2018 2019 - 2020 2021 - 2022 After 2022
          
LKE         
Long-term Debt (a)$5,200
 $98
 $1,405
 $250
 $3,447
Interest on Long-term Debt (b)3,120
 199
 388
 300
 2,233
Operating Leases (c)82
 26
 27
 14
 15
Coal and Natural Gas Purchase Obligations (f)1,955
 582
 930
 375
 68
Unconditional Power Purchase Obligations (g)593
 29
 53
 54
 457
Construction Obligations (h)500
 305
 147
 48
 
Pension Benefit Plan Obligations (e)105
 105
 
 
 
Other Obligations417
 151
 143
 70
 53
Total Contractual Cash Obligations$11,972
 $1,495
 $3,093
 $1,111
 $6,273
          
LG&E         
Long-term Debt (a)$1,724
 $98
 $334
 $
 $1,292
Interest on Long-term Debt (b)1,185
 63
 117
 108
 897
Operating Leases (c)39
 15
 13
 5
 6
Coal and Natural Gas Purchase Obligations (f)839
 252
 403
 154
 30
Unconditional Power Purchase Obligations (g)411
 20
 37
 38
 316
Construction Obligations (h)256
 185
 62
 9
 
Pension Benefit Plan Obligations (e)54
 54
 
 
 
Other Obligations149
 47
 59
 26
 17
Total Contractual Cash Obligations$4,657
 $734
 $1,025
 $340
 $2,558
          
KU         
Long-term Debt (a)$2,351
 $
 $596
 $
 $1,755
Interest on Long-term Debt (b)1,719
 93
 186
 153
 1,287
Operating Leases (c)41
 10
 14
 9
 8
Coal and Natural Gas Purchase Obligations (f)1,115
 330
 527
 221
 37
Unconditional Power Purchase Obligations (g)182
 9
 16
 16
 141
Construction Obligations (h)218
 101
 80
 37
 
Pension Benefit Plan Obligations (e)46
 46
 
 
 
Other Obligations187
 49
 64
 38
 36
Total Contractual Cash Obligations$5,859
 $638
 $1,483
 $474
 $3,264
 
(a)Reflects principal maturities based on stated maturity or earlier put dates. See Note 7 to the Financial Statements for a discussion of variable-rate remarketable bonds issued on behalf of LG&E and KU. The Registrants do not have any significant capital lease obligations.
(b)Assumes interest payments through stated maturity or earlier put dates. For PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU the payments herein are subject to change, as payments for debt that is or becomes variable-rate debt have been estimated and for PPL, payments denominated in British pounds sterling have been translated to U.S. dollars at a current foreign currency exchange rate.
(c)See Note 9 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
(d)The amounts include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding and specify all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. Primarily includes as applicable, the purchase obligations of electricity, coal, natural gas and limestone, as well as certain construction expenditures, which are also included in the Capital Expenditures table presented above.

Table of Contents

applicable, the purchase obligations of electricity, coal, natural gas and limestone, as well as certain construction expenditures, which are also included in the Capital Expenditures table presented above.
(e)The amounts for PPL include WPD's contractual deficit pension funding requirements arising from actuarial valuations performed in March 2013 and March 2016. The U.K. electricity regulator currently allows a recovery of a substantial portion of the contributions relating to the plan deficit. The amounts also include contributions made or committed to be made in 20172018 for PPL's and LKE's U.S. pension plans (for PPL Electric, LG&E and KU includes their share of these amounts). Based on the current funded status of these plans, except for WPD's plans, no cash contributions are required. See Note 11 to the Financial Statements for a discussion of expected contributions.
(f)Represents contracts to purchase coal, natural gas and natural gas transportation. See Note 13 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
(g)Represents future minimum payments under OVEC power purchase agreements through June 2040. See Note 13 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
(h)Represents construction commitments, including commitments for LG&E's and KU's Trimble County landfill construction and CCR Rule Closure and Process Water Program along with LG&E's Paddy'sMill Creek Gypsum Dewatering and Cane Run plant demolition, Ohio Falls refurbishment and completion of the Mill Creek environmental air project, which are also reflected in the Capital Expenditures table presented above.



78


Table of Contents


Dividends/Distributions
 
(PPL)
 
PPL views dividends as an integral component of shareowner return and expects to continue to pay dividends in amounts that are within the context of maintaining a capitalization structure that supports investment grade credit ratings. In November 2016,2017, PPL declared its quarterly common stock dividend, payable January 3, 2017,2, 2018, at 3839.5 cents per share (equivalent to $1.52$1.58 per annum). On February 1, 2017,22, 2018, PPL announced that the company is increasing its common stock dividend to 39.541.0 cents per share on a quarterly basis (equivalent to $1.581.64 per annum). Future dividends will be declared at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend upon future earnings, cash flows, financial and legal requirements and other relevant factors.

See Note 8 to the Financial Statements for information regarding the June 1, 2015 distribution to PPL's shareowners of a newly formed entity, Holdco, which at closing owned all of the membership interests of PPL Energy Supply and all of the common stock of Talen Energy.

Subject to certain exceptions, PPL may not declare or pay any cash dividend or distribution on its capital stock during any period in which PPL Capital Funding defers interest payments on its 2007 Series A Junior Subordinated Notes due 2067 or 2013 Series B Junior Subordinated Notes due 2073. At December 31, 2016,2017, no interest payments were deferred.
 
(PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU)
 
From time to time, as determined by their respective Board of Directors, the Registrants pay dividends or distributions, as applicable, to their respective shareholders or members. Certain of the credit facilities of PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU include minimum debt covenant ratios that could effectively restrict the payment of dividends or distributions.
 
(All Registrants)
 
See Note 7 to the Financial Statements for these and other restrictions related to distributions on capital interests for the Registrants and their subsidiaries.
 
Purchase or Redemption of Debt Securities
 
The Registrants will continue to evaluate outstanding debt securities and may decide to purchase or redeem these securities in open market or privately negotiated transactions, in exchange transactions or otherwise, depending upon prevailing market conditions, available cash and other factors, and may be commenced or suspended at any time. The amounts involved may be material.
 
Rating Agency Actions

Moody's and S&P have periodically reviewedreview the credit ratings of the debt of the Registrants and their subsidiaries. Based on their respective independent reviews, the rating agencies may make certain ratings revisions or ratings affirmations.
 
A credit rating reflects an assessment by the rating agency of the creditworthiness associated with an issuer and particular securities that it issues. The credit ratings of the Registrants and their subsidiaries are based on information provided by the Registrants and other sources. The ratings of Moody's and S&P are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any securities of the Registrants or their subsidiaries. Such ratings may be subject to revisions or withdrawal by the agencies at any time and should be evaluated independently of each other and any other rating that may be assigned to the securities.

Table of Contents

 
The credit ratings of the Registrants and their subsidiaries affect their liquidity, access to capital markets and cost of borrowing under their credit facilities. A downgrade in the Registrants' or their subsidiaries' credit ratings could result in higher borrowing costs and reduced access to capital markets. The Registrants and their subsidiaries have no credit rating triggers that would result in the reduction of access to capital markets or the acceleration of maturity dates of outstanding debt.
 
The following table sets forth the Registrants' and their subsidiaries' credit ratings for outstanding debt securities or commercial paper programs as of December 31, 2016.2017.


79


Table of Contents


  Senior Unsecured Senior Secured Commercial Paper
             
Issuer Moody's S&P Moody's S&P Moody's S&P
PPL            
PPL Capital Funding Baa2 BBB+     P-2 A-2
WPD plc Baa3 BBB+        
WPD (East Midlands) Baa1 A-        
WPD (West Midlands) Baa1 A-        
WPD (South Wales) Baa1 A-        
WPD (South West) Baa1 A-        
             
PPL and PPL Electric            
PPL Electric     A1 A P-2 A-2
             
PPL and LKE            
LKE Baa1 BBB+        
LG&E     A1 A P-2 A-2
KU     A1 A P-2 A-2
 
The rating agencies have taken the following actions related to the Registrants and their subsidiaries.

(PPL)
 
In February 2016,March 2017, Moody's and S&P affirmed their commercial paperassigned ratings for PPL Capital Funding's $1.0 billion commercial paper program.of Baa1 and A- to WPD (South Wales)’s £50 million 0.01% Index-linked Senior Notes due 2029.

In May 2016,September 2017, Moody's and S&P assigned ratings of Baa2 and BBB+ to PPL Capital Funding's $650Funding’s $500 million 3.10%4.00% Senior Notes due 2026.2047.

In June 2016,September 2017, S&P assignedaffirmed its ratings with a long-term issuer rating of A-stable outlook for PPL and a short-term issuer rating of A-2 to PPL Capital Funding.

(PPL Electric)
In February 2016, Moody's and S&P affirmed their commercial paper ratings for PPL Electric's $400 million commercial paper program.
In February 2016,November 2017, Moody's and S&P assigned ratings of A1Baa1 and AA- to LCIDA's $116WPD (South West)'s £250 million 0.90% Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds2.375% Senior Notes due 2029 and $108 million 0.90% Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds due 2027, issued on behalf of 2029.

(PPL Electric.Electric)

In January 2017, Moody's and S&P affirmed their commercial paper ratings for PPL Electric's $650 million commercial paper program.

(LG&E)

In September 2016,May 2017, Moody's and S&P assigned ratings of A1 and A to the $125PPL Electric's $475 million County3.95% First Mortgage Bonds due 2047.

In August 2017, Moody's assigned a rating of Trimble, KentuckyA1 and S&P confirmed its rating of A for LCIDA's $116 million 1.80% Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds (PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Project) Series 20162016A due 2029 and LCIDA's $108 million 1.80% Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds (PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Project) Series 2016B due 2027, each previously issued on behalf of PPL Electric.

In September 2017, S&P affirmed its ratings with a stable outlook for PPL Electric.

(LKE)

In September 2017, S&P affirmed its ratings with a stable outlook for LKE.

(LG&E)

In March 2017, Moody’s assigned a rating of A1 and S&P confirmed its rating of A for the Louisville/Jefferson Metro Government of Kentucky's $128 million 1.5% Pollution Control Revenue Bonds, 2003 Series A (Louisville Gas and Electric Company Project) due 2044,2033, previously issued on behalf of LG&E.



80


Table of Contents

(KU)

In August 2016, Moody'sMay 2017, Moody’s and S&P assigned ratings of A1 and A to the $96 million County of Carroll, Kentucky Pollution ControlTrimble, Kentucky's $60 million 3.75% Environmental Facilities Revenue Bonds, 2017 Series A (Louisville Gas and Electric Company Project) due 2033, issued on behalf of LG&E.

In May 2017, Moody’s assigned a rating of A1 and in June 2017, S&P confirmed its rating of A for the Louisville/Jefferson Metro Government of Kentucky's $31 million 1.25% Environmental Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds, 2007 Series 2016A (Louisville Gas and Electric Company Project) due 2033, previously issued on behalf of LG&E.

In May 2017, Moody’s assigned a rating of A1 and in June 2017, S&P confirmed its rating of A for the Louisville/Jefferson Metro Government of Kentucky's $35 million 1.25% Environmental Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds, 2007 Series B (Louisville Gas and Electric Company Project) due 2033, previously issued on behalf of LG&E.

In September 2017, S&P affirmed its ratings with a stable outlook for LG&E.

(KU)

In July 2017, Moody’s affirmed its rating of Aa2 and in August 2017, S&P confirmed its rating of AA for the County of Mercer, Kentucky's $13 million Solid Waste Disposal Facility Revenue Bonds, 2000 Series A (Kentucky Utilities Company Project) due 2042,2023, the County of Carroll, Kentucky's $50 million Environmental Facilities Revenue Bonds, 2004 Series A (Kentucky Utilities Company Project) due 2034, the County of Carroll, Kentucky's $78 million Environmental Facilities Revenue Bonds, 2008 Series A (Kentucky Utilities Company Project) due 2032 and the County of Carroll, Kentucky's $54 million Environmental Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds, 2006 Series B (Kentucky Utilities Company Project) due 2034, each previously issued on behalf of KU.

In September 2017, S&P affirmed its ratings with a stable outlook for KU.

In January 2018, S&P affirmed its rating of AA for the County of Mercer, Kentucky's $13 million Solid Waste Disposal Facility Revenue Bonds, 2000 Series A (Kentucky Utilities Company Project) due 2023, the County of Carroll, Kentucky's $50 million Environmental Facilities Revenue Bonds, 2004 Series A (Kentucky Utilities Company Project) due 2034, the County of Carroll, Kentucky's $78 million Environmental Facilities Revenue Bonds, 2008 Series A (Kentucky Utilities Company Project) due 2032 and the County of Carroll, Kentucky's $54 million Environmental Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds, 2006 Series B (Kentucky Utilities Company Project) due 2034, each previously issued on behalf of KU.
 
Ratings Triggers
 
(PPL)
 
As discussed in Note 7 to the Financial Statements, certain of WPD's senior unsecured notes may be put by the holders to the issuer for redemption if the long-term credit ratings assigned to the notes are withdrawn by any of the rating agencies (Moody's or S&P) or reduced to a non-investment grade rating of Ba1 or BB+ or lower in connection with a restructuring event. A restructuring event includes the loss of, or a material adverse change to, the distribution licenses under which WPD (East Midlands), WPD (South West), WPD (South Wales) and WPD (West Midlands) operate and would be a trigger event for each company. These notes totaled £4.4£4.7 billion (approximately $5.5$6.4 billion) nominal value at December 31, 2016.2017.
 
(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
 
Various derivative and non-derivative contracts, including contracts for the sale and purchase of electricity and fuel, commodity transportation and storage, interest rate and foreign currency instruments (for PPL), contain provisions that require the posting of additional collateral, or permit the counterparty to terminate the contract, if PPL's, LKE's, LG&E's or KU's or their subsidiaries' credit rating, as applicable, were to fall below investment grade. See Note 17 to the Financial Statements for a discussion of "Credit Risk-Related Contingent Features," including a discussion of the potential additional collateral requirements for PPL, LKE and LG&E for derivative contracts in a net liability position at December 31, 2016.2017.
 
Guarantees for Subsidiaries (PPL)
 
PPL guarantees certain consolidated affiliate financing arrangements. Some of the guarantees contain financial and other covenants that, if not met, would limit or restrict the consolidated affiliates' access to funds under these financing arrangements, accelerate maturity of such arrangements or limit the consolidated affiliates' ability to enter into certain transactions. At this


81


Table of Contents


time, PPL believes that these covenants will not limit access to relevant funding sources. See Note 13 to the Financial Statements for additional information about guarantees.
 
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements (All Registrants)
 
The Registrants have entered into certain agreements that may contingently require payment to a guaranteed or indemnified party. See Note 13 to the Financial Statements for a discussion of these agreements.
 
Risk Management
 
Market Risk
 
(All Registrants)
 
See Notes 1, 16, and 17 to the Financial Statements for information about the Registrants' risk management objectives, valuation techniques and accounting designations.
 
The forward-looking information presented below provides estimates of what may occur in the future, assuming certain adverse market conditions and model assumptions. Actual future results may differ materially from those presented. These disclosures are not precise indicators of expected future losses, but are rather only indicators of possible losses under normal market conditions at a given confidence level.
 
Interest Rate Risk
 
The Registrants and their subsidiaries issue debt to finance their operations, which exposes them to interest rate risk. The Registrants and their subsidiaries utilize various financial derivative instruments to adjust the mix of fixed and floating interest rates in their debt portfolios, adjust the duration of their debt portfolios and lock in benchmark interest rates in anticipation of future financing, when appropriate. Risk limits under the risk management program are designed to balance risk exposure to

Table of Contents

volatility in interest expense and changes in the fair value of the debt portfolios due to changes in the absolute level of interest rates. In addition, the interest rate risk of certain subsidiaries is potentially mitigated as a result of the existing regulatory framework or the timing of rate cases.
 
The following interest rate hedges were outstanding at December 31. 
2016 20152017 2016
Exposure
Hedged
 
Fair Value,
Net - Asset
(Liability) (a)
 
Effect of a
10% Adverse
Movement
in Rates (b)
 
Maturities
Ranging
Through
 
Exposure
Hedged
 
Fair Value,
Net - Asset
(Liability) (a)
 
Effect of a
10% Adverse
Movement
in Rates (b)
Exposure
Hedged
 
Fair Value,
Net - Asset
(Liability) (a)
 
Effect of a
10% Adverse
Movement
in Rates (b)
 
Maturities
Ranging
Through
 
Exposure
Hedged
 
Fair Value,
Net - Asset
(Liability) (a)
 
Effect of a
10% Adverse
Movement
in Rates (b)
PPL                          
Cash flow hedges 
  
  
    
  
  
 
  
  
    
  
  
Interest rate swaps (c)$
 $
 $
 $300
 $(24) $(7)
Cross-currency swaps (d)802
 191
 (90) 2028 1,262
 87
 (152)
Cross-currency swaps (c)$702
 $103
 $(84) 2028 $802
 $191
 $(90)
Economic hedges                          
Interest rate swaps (e)147
 (32) (2) 2033 179
 (48) (2)
Interest rate swaps (d)147
 (27) (1) 2033 147
 (32) (2)
LKE                          
Economic hedges                          
Interest rate swaps (e)147
 (32) (2) 2033 179
 (48) (2)
Interest rate swaps (d)147
 (27) (1) 2033 147
 (32) (2)
LG&E                          
Economic hedges                          
Interest rate swaps (e)147
 (32) (2) 2033 179
 (48) (2)
Interest rate swaps (d)147
 (27) (1) 2033 147
 (32) (2)
 
(a)Includes accrued interest, if applicable.
(b)Effects of adverse movements decrease assets or increase liabilities, as applicable, which could result in an asset becoming a liability. Sensitivities represent a 10% adverse movement in interest rates, except for cross-currency swaps which also includes a 10% adverse movement in foreign currency exchange rates.
(c)Changes in the fair value of such cash flow hedges are recorded in equity or as regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities, if recovered through regulated rates, and reclassified into earnings in the same period during which the item being hedged affects earnings.
(d)Cross-currency swaps are utilized to hedge the principal and interest payments of WPD's U.S. dollar-denominated senior notes. Changes in the fair value of these instruments are recorded in equity and reclassified into earnings in the same period during which the item being hedged affects earnings.
(e)(d)Realized changes in the fair value of such economic hedges are recoverable through regulated rates and any subsequent changes in the fair value of these derivatives are included in regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities.



82


Table of Contents


The Registrants are exposed to a potential increase in interest expense and to changes in the fair value of their debt portfolios. The estimated impact of a 10% adverse movement in interest rates on interest expense at December 31, 20162017 and 20152016 was insignificant for PPL, PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU. The estimated impact of a 10% adverse movement in interest rates on the fair value of debt at December 31 is shown below.
10% Adverse Movement in Rates10% Adverse Movement in Rates
2016 20152017 2016
PPL$590
 $710
$620
 $590
PPL Electric138
 152
162
 138
LKE182
 192
168
 182
LG&E66
 69
62
 66
KU100
 104
92
 100
 
Foreign Currency Risk (PPL)
 
PPL is exposed to foreign currency risk primarily through investments in U.K. affiliates. Under its risk management program, PPL may enter into financial instruments to hedge certain foreign currency exposures, including translation risk of expected earnings, firm commitments, recognized assets or liabilities, anticipated transactions and net investments.
 

Table of Contents

The following foreign currency hedges were outstanding at December 31. 
 2016 2015
 
Exposure
Hedged
 
Fair Value,
Net - Asset
(Liability)
 
Effect of a 10%
Adverse Movement
 in Foreign Currency
Exchange Rates (a)
 
Maturities
Ranging
Through
 Exposure
Hedged
 
Fair Value,
Net - Asset
(Liability)
 
Effect of a 10%
Adverse Movement
in Foreign Currency
Exchange Rates (a)
Net investment hedges (b)£
 $
 $
   £50
 $10
 $(7)
Economic hedges (c)1,909
 184
 (215) 2018 1,831
 198
 (246)
 2017 2016
 
Exposure
Hedged
 
Fair Value,
Net - Asset
(Liability)
 
Effect of a 10%
Adverse Movement
 in Foreign Currency
Exchange Rates (a)
 
Maturities
Ranging
Through
 Exposure
Hedged
 
Fair Value,
Net - Asset
(Liability)
 
Effect of a 10%
Adverse Movement
in Foreign Currency
Exchange Rates (a)
Economic hedges (b)£2,563
 $15
 $(323) 2020 £1,909
 $184
 $(215)
 
(a)Effects of adverse movements decrease assets or increase liabilities, as applicable, which could result in an asset becoming a liability.
(b)To protect the value of a portion of its net investment in WPD, PPL executes forward contracts to sell GBP.
(c)To economically hedge the translation of expected earnings denominated in GBP.

(All Registrants)
 
Commodity Price Risk
 
PPL is exposed to commodity price risk through its domestic subsidiaries as described below.

PPL Electric is exposedrequired to purchase electricity to fulfill its obligation as a PLR. Potential commodity price risk from its obligation as PLR; however,is mitigated through its PUC-approved cost recovery mechanism substantially eliminates its exposure to this risk. PPL Electric also mitigates its exposure to commodity price risk by entering intoand full-requirement supply agreements to serve its PLR customers. These supply agreementscustomers which transfer the commodity price risk associated with the PLR obligation to the energy suppliers.
LG&E's and KU's rates include certain mechanisms for fuel, fuel-related expenses and fuel-related expenses.energy purchases. In addition, LG&E's rates include a mechanism for natural gas supply expenses. These mechanisms generally provide for timely recovery of market price fluctuations associated with these expenses.

Volumetric Risk
 
PPL is exposed to volumetric risk through its subsidiaries as described below.
 
WPD is exposed to volumetric risk which is significantly mitigated as a result of the method of regulation in the U.K. Under the RIIO-ED1 price control period,regulations, recovery of such exposure occurs on a two year lag. See Note 1 to the Financial Statements for additional information on revenue recognition under RIIO-ED1.
PPL Electric, LG&E and KU are exposed to volumetric risk on retail sales, mainly due to weather and other economic conditions for which there is limited mitigation between rate cases.


83




Defined Benefit Plans - Equity Securities Price Risk
 
See "Application of Critical Accounting Policies - Defined Benefits" for additional information regarding the effect of equity securities price risk on plan assets.
 
Credit Risk
 
(All Registrants)

Credit risk is the risk that the Registrants would incur a loss as a result of nonperformance by counterparties of their contractual obligations. The Registrants maintain credit policies and procedures with respect to counterparty credit (including requirements that counterparties maintain specified credit ratings) and require other assurances in the form of credit support or collateral in certain circumstances in order to limit counterparty credit risk. However, the Registrants, as applicable, have concentrations of suppliers and customers among electric utilities, financial institutions and energy marketing and trading companies. These concentrations may impact the Registrants' overall exposure to credit risk, positively or negatively, as counterparties may be similarly affected by changes in economic, regulatory or other conditions.
 


(PPL and PPL Electric)
 
In 2014, PPL Electric filed a request withJanuary 2017, the PUC for approval of PPL Electric's PLR procurement plan for the period of June 2015 through May 2017, which was approved in January 2015. To date, PPL Electric has conducted all of its planned competitive solicitations. In February 2016, PPL Electric filedissued a request with the PUC for approval ofFinal Order approving PPL Electric's PLR procurement plan for the period June 2017 through May 2021, which includes a total of eight solicitations for electricity supply held semiannuallysemi-annually in April and October. In October 2016, the PUC approvedTo date, PPL Electric's plan with the exceptionElectric has conducted two of one item. On January 26, 2017, the PUC issued a Final Order approving its original position and concluded proceedings on the plan.planned eight competitive solicitations.
 
Under the standard Supply Master Agreement (the Agreement) for the competitive solicitation process, PPL Electric requires all suppliers to post collateral if their credit exposure exceeds an established credit limit. In the event a supplier defaults on its obligation, PPL Electric would be required to seek replacement power in the market. All incremental costs incurred by PPL Electric would be recoverable from customers in future rates. At December 31, 2016,2017, most of the successful bidders under all of the solicitations had an investment grade credit rating from S&P, and were not required to post collateral under the Agreement. A small portion of bidders were required to post an insignificant amount of collateral under the Agreement. There is no instance under the Agreement in which PPL Electric is required to post collateral to its suppliers.
 
See Note 17 to the Financial Statements for additional information on credit risk.
 
Foreign Currency Translation (PPL)
 
The value of the British pound sterling fluctuates in relation to the U.S. dollar. In 2017, changes in this exchange rate resulted in a foreign currency translation gain of $537 million, which primarily reflected a $935 million increase to PP&E and $198 million increase to goodwill partially offset by a $549 million increase to long-term debt and an increase of $47 million to other net liabilities. In 2016, changes in this exchange rate resulted in a foreign currency translation loss of $1.1 billion, which primarily reflected a $2.1 billion decrease to PP&E and $490 million decrease to goodwill partially offset by a $1.3 billion decrease to long-term debt and a decrease of $208 million to other net liabilities. In 2015, changes in this exchange rate resulted in a foreign currency translation loss of $240 million, which primarily reflected a $472 million decrease to PP&E and $117 million decrease to goodwill partially offset by a $285 million decrease to long-term debt and a decrease of $64 million to other net liabilities. In 2014, changes in this exchange rate resulted in a foreign currency translation loss of $290 million, which primarily reflected a $542 million decrease to PP&E and $138 million decrease to goodwill partially offset by a $337 million decrease to long-term debt and a decrease of $53 million to other net liabilities. The impact of foreign currency translation is recorded in AOCI.

(All Registrants)
 
Related Party Transactions
 
The Registrants are not aware of any material ownership interests or operating responsibility by senior management in outside partnerships, including leasing transactions with variable interest entities, or other entities doing business with the Registrants. See Note 14 to the Financial Statements for additional information on related party transactions for PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU.
 
Acquisitions, Development and Divestitures
 
The Registrants from time to time evaluate opportunities for potential acquisitions, divestitures and development projects. Development projects are reexamined based on market conditions and other factors to determine whether to proceed with,


84




modify or terminate the projects. Any resulting transactions may impact future financial results. See Note 8 to the Financial Statements for information on the more significant activities.
 
(PPL)
 
See Note 8 to the Financial Statements for information on the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply.
 
(All Registrants) 

Environmental Matters
 
Extensive federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations are applicable to PPL's, PPL Electric's, LKE's, LG&E's and KU's air emissions, water discharges and the management of hazardous and solid waste, as well as other aspects of the Registrants' businesses. The cost of compliance or alleged non-compliance cannot be predicted with certainty but could be


significant. In addition, costs may increase significantly if the requirements or scope of environmental laws or regulations, or similar rules, are expanded or changed. Costs may take the form of increased capital expenditures or operating and maintenance expenses, monetary fines, penalties or other restrictions. Many of these environmental law considerations are also applicable to the operations of key suppliers, or customers, such as coal producers and industrial power users, and may impact the cost for their products or their demand for the Registrants' services. Increased capital and operating costs are subject to rate recovery. PPL, PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU can provide no assurances as to the ultimate outcome of future environmental or rate proceedings before regulatory authorities.
 
See Note 13 to the Financial Statements for a discussion of the more significant environmental matters including:

Legal Matters,
NAAQS, Climate Change,
Coal Combustion Residuals,
Effluent Limitations Guidelines, CCRs, and
National Ambient Air Quality Standards.

Additionally, see ELGs. See "Financial Condition - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Forecasted Uses of Cash - Capital Expenditures" in "Item 1. Business - Environmental Matters"7. Combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for further information on projected environmental matters.capital expenditures for 2018 through 2022. See Note 19 to the Financial Statements for information related to the impacts of CCRs on AROs.

Sustainability

Increasing attention has been focused on a broad range of corporate activities under the heading of “sustainability”, which has resulted in a significant increase in the number of requests from interested parties for information on sustainability topics. These parties range from investor groups focused on environmental, social, governance and other matters to non-investors concerned with a variety of public policy matters. Often the scope of the information sought is very broad and not necessarily relevant to an issuer’s business or industry. As a result, a number of private groups have proposed to standardize the subject matter constituting sustainability, either generally or by industry. Those efforts remain ongoing. In addition, certain of these private groups have advocated that the SEC promulgate regulations requiring specific sustainability reporting under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “’34 Act”), or that issuers voluntarily include certain sustainability disclosure in their ’34 Act reports. To date, no new reporting requirements have been adopted or proposed by the SEC.

As has been PPL’s practice, to the extent sustainability issues have or may have a material impact on the Registrants’ financial condition or results of operation, PPL discloses such matters in accordance with applicable securities law and SEC regulations. With respect to other sustainability topics that PPL deems relevant to investors but that are not required to be reported under applicable securities law and SEC regulation, PPL will continue each spring to publish its annual sustainability report and post that report on its corporate website at www.pplweb.com and on www.pplsustainability.com. Neither the information in such annual sustainability report nor the information at such websites is incorporated in this Form 10-K by reference, and it should not be considered a part of this Form 10-K. In preparing its sustainability report, PPL is guided by the framework established by the Global Reporting Initiative, which identifies environmental, social, governance and other subject matter categories, together with recent efforts by the Edison Electric Institute to provide guidance as to the appropriate subset of sustainability information that can be applied consistently across the electric utility industry.

Cybersecurity

See “Cybersecurity Management” in “Item 1. Business” and “Item 1A. Risk factors” for a discussion of cybersecurity risks affecting the Registrants and the related strategies for managing these risks.



85




Competition
 
See "Competition" under each of PPL's reportable segments in "Item 1. Business - General - Segment Information" and "Item 1A. Risk Factors" for a discussion of competitive factors affecting the Registrants.
 
New Accounting Guidance
 
See Notes 1 andNote 21 to the Financial Statements for a discussion of new accounting guidance adopted and pending adoption.
 
Application of Critical Accounting Policies
 
Financial condition and results of operations are impacted by the methods, assumptions and estimates used in the application of critical accounting policies. The following accounting policies are particularly important to an understanding of the reported financial condition or results of operations and require management to make estimates or other judgments of matters that are inherently uncertain. Changes in the estimates or other judgments included within these accounting policies could result in a significant change to the information presented in the Financial Statements (these accounting policies are also discussed in


Note 1 to the Financial Statements). Senior management has reviewed with PPL's Audit Committee these critical accounting policies, the following disclosures regarding their application, and the estimates and assumptions regarding them.
Price Risk Management(PPL)
See "Financial Condition - Risk Management" above, as well as "Price Risk Management" in Note 1 to the Financial Statements.

Defined Benefits

(All Registrants)
 
Certain of the Registrants'Registrants and/or their subsidiaries sponsor or participate in, as applicable, variouscertain qualified funded and non-qualified unfunded defined benefit pension plans and both funded and unfunded other postretirement benefit plans. These plans are applicable to the majority of the Registrants' employees (based on eligibility for their applicable plans). The Registrants and certain of their subsidiaries record an asset or liability to recognize the funded status of all defined benefit plans with an offsetting entry to AOCI or, in the case of PPL Electric, LG&E and KU, regulatory assets and liabilities for amounts that are expected to be recovered through regulated customer rates. Consequently, the funded status of all defined benefit plans is fully recognized on the Balance Sheets. See Notes 6 and 11 to the Financial Statements for additional information about the plans and the accounting for defined benefits.
 
A summary of plan sponsors by Registrant and whether a Registrant or its subsidiaries sponsor (S) or participate in and receives allocations (P) from those plans is shown in the table below.
Plan Sponsor PPL PPL Electric LKE LG&E KU
PPL Services S P      
WPD (a) S        
LKE     S P P
LG&E       S  
 
(a)Does not sponsor or participate in other postretirement benefits plans.

Management makes certain assumptions regarding the valuation of benefit obligations and the performance of plan assets. As such, annual net periodic defined benefit costs are recorded in current earnings or regulatory assets based on estimated results. Any differences between actual and estimated results are recorded in AOCI, or in the case of PPL Electric, LG&E and KU, regulatory assets and liabilities for amounts that are expected to be recovered through regulated customer rates. These amounts in AOCI or regulatory assets and liabilities are amortized to income over future periods. The delayed recognition allows for a smoothed recognition of costs over the working lives of the employees who benefit under the plans. The primary assumptions are:
 
Discount Rate - The discount rate is used in calculating the present value of benefits, which is based on projections of benefit payments to be made in the future. The objective in selecting the discount rate is to measure the single amount that, if invested at the measurement date in a portfolio of high-quality debt instruments, would provide the necessary future cash flows to pay the accumulated benefits when due.

Expected Return on Plan Assets - Management projects the long-term rates of return on plan assets that will be earned over the life of the plan. These projected returns reduce the net benefit costs the Registrants record currently.


86





Rate of Compensation Increase - Management projects employees' annual pay increases, which are used to project employees' pension benefits at retirement.

Health Care Cost Trend Rate - Management projects the expected increases in the cost of health care.

In addition to the economic assumptions above that are evaluated annually, Management must also make assumptions regarding the life expectancy of employees covered under their defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans.

U.S. - at December 31, 2014, the plan sponsors adopted the new mortality tables issued by the Society of Actuaries in October 2014 (RP-2014 base tables) for all U.S. defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans. In


addition, at December 31, 2017, the plan sponsors updated the basis for estimating projected mortality improvements and selected the IRS BB-2D two-dimensionalMP-2017 improvement scale on a generational basis for all U.S. defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans. TheseThis new mortality assumptions reflect the recognition of both improved life expectancies andassumption reflects the expectation of continuinglower ongoing improvements in life expectancies.

U.K. - at March 31 2016, the UKU.K. plan sponsors adopted the new mortality assumptions based on the “SAPS S2 All” tables issued by the Self-Administered Pensions Schemes’ (SAPS) study for all U.K. defined benefit pension plans. In addition, the UKU.K. plan sponsors updated the basis for estimating projected mortality improvements and selected the CMI 2015 Core Projections model published by the Continuous Mortality Investigation study with a long-term future improvement rate of 1% for all U.K. defined benefit pension plans. These new mortality assumptions reflect the impact of the most recently available actual scheme mortality data (which has been higher than previously expected) on both current life expectancies and the expectation of continuing improvements in life expectancies. The use of the new base tables and improvement scale resulted in a decrease to U.K. defined benefit pension obligations, a decrease to future expense and an increase to funded status.

(PPL)
 
In selecting the discount rate for its U.K. pension plans, WPD starts with a cash flow analysis of the expected benefit payment stream for its plans. These plan-specific cash flows are matched against a spot-rate yield curve to determine the assumed discount rate. The spot-rate yield curve uses an iBoxx British pounds sterling denominated corporate bond index as its base. From this base, those bonds with the lowest and highest yields are eliminated to develop an appropriate subset of bonds. Historically, WPD used the single weighted-average discount rate derived from the spot rates used to discount the benefit obligation. Concurrent with the annual remeasurement of plan assets and obligations at December 31, 2015, WPD began using individual spot rates to measure service cost and interest cost beginning with the calculation of 2016 net periodic defined benefit cost.
 
An individual bond matching approach, which is used for the U.S. pension plans as discussed below, is not used for the U.K. pension plans because the universe of bonds in the U.K. is not deep enough to adequately support such an approach.
 
(All Registrants)
 
In selecting the discount rates for U.S. defined benefit plans, the plan sponsors start with a cash flow analysis of the expected benefit payment stream for their plans. The plan-specific cash flows are matched against the coupons and expected maturity values of individually selected bonds. This bond matching process begins with the full universe of Aa-rated non-callable (or callable with make-whole provisions) bonds, serving as the base from which those with the lowest and highest yields are eliminated to develop an appropriate subset of bonds. Individual bonds are then selected based on the timing of each plan's cash flows and parameters are established as to the percentage of each individual bond issue that could be hypothetically purchased and the surplus reinvestment rates to be assumed.
 
To determine the expected return on plan assets, plan sponsors project the long-term rates of return on plan assets using a best-estimate of expected returns, volatilities and correlations for each asset class. Each plan's specific current and expected asset allocations are also considered in developing a reasonable return assumption.
 
In selecting a rate of compensation increase, plan sponsors consider past experience in light of movements in inflation rates.
 
The following table provides the weighted-average assumptions selected for discount rate, expected return on plan assets and rate of compensation increase at December 31 used to measure current year obligations and subsequent year net periodic defined benefit costs under GAAP, as applicable. 


87




Assumption / Registrant 2016 2015 2017 2016
Discount rate        
Pension - PPL (U.S.) 4.21% 4.59% 3.70% 4.21%
Pension - PPL (U.K.) Obligations 2.87% 3.68% 2.65% 2.87%
Pension - PPL (U.K.) Service Cost (a) 2.99% 3.90% 2.73% 2.99%
Pension - PPL (U.K.) Interest Cost (a) 2.41% 3.14% 2.31% 2.41%
Pension - LKE 4.19% 4.56% 3.69% 4.19%
Pension - LG&E 4.13% 4.49% 3.65% 4.13%
Other Postretirement - PPL 4.11% 4.48% 3.64% 4.11%
Other Postretirement - LKE 4.12% 4.49% 3.65% 4.12%
        
Expected return on plan assets        
Pension - PPL (U.S.) 7.00% 7.00% 7.25% 7.00%
Pension - PPL (U.K.) 7.22% 7.20% 7.23% 7.22%
Pension - LKE 7.00% 7.00% 7.25% 7.00%
Pension - LG&E 7.00% 7.00% 7.25% 7.00%
Other Postretirement - PPL 6.21% 6.11% 6.40% 6.21%
Other Postretirement - LKE 6.82% 6.82% 7.15% 6.82%
        
Rate of compensation increase        
Pension - PPL (U.S.) 3.95% 3.93% 3.78% 3.95%
Pension - PPL (U.K.) 3.50% 4.00% 3.50% 3.50%
Pension - LKE 3.50% 3.50% 3.50% 3.50%
Other Postretirement - PPL 3.92% 3.91% 3.75% 3.92%
Other Postretirement - LKE 3.50% 3.50% 3.50% 3.50%
 
(a)WPD began using individual spot rates from the yield curve used to discount the benefit obligation to measure service cost and interest cost for the calculation of net periodic defined benefit cost in 2016. PPL's U.S. plans use a single discount rate derived from an individual bond matching model to measure the benefit obligation, service cost and interest cost. See Note 1 to the Financial Statements for additional details.

In selecting health care cost trend rates, plan sponsors consider past performance and forecasts of health care costs. At December 31, 2016,2017, the health care cost trend rate for all plans was 7.0%6.6% for 2017,2018, gradually declining to an ultimate trend rate of 5.0% in 2022.
 
A variance in the assumptions listed above could have a significant impact on accrued defined benefit liabilities or assets, reported annual net periodic defined benefit costs and AOCI or regulatory assets and liabilities. At December 31, 2016,2017, the defined benefit plans were recorded in the Registrants' financial statements as follows.
PPL PPL Electric LKE LG&E KUPPL PPL Electric LKE LG&E KU
Balance Sheet:                  
Regulatory assets (a)$947
 $549
 $398
 $246
 $152
$880
 $504
 $376
 $234
 $142
Regulatory liabilities23
  
 23
  
 23
27
  
 27
   27
Pension assets284
        
Pension liabilities1,008
 281
 354
 53
 62
813
 246
 369
 45
 36
Other postretirement and postemployment
benefit liabilities
213
 72
 122
 76
 40
184
 62
 107
 74
 32
AOCI (pre-tax)2,930
  
 119
  
  
3,144
  
 150
  
  
                  
Statement of Income: 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
Defined benefits expense$(35) $11
 $30
 $11
 $7
$(87) $12
 $33
 $11
 $5
Increase (decrease) from prior year(93) (4) (8) (1) (3)(52) 1
 3
 
 (2)
 
(a)As a result of the 2014 Kentucky rate case settlement that became effective July 1, 2015, the difference between pension cost calculated in accordance with LG&E's and KU's pension accounting policy and pension cost calculated using a 15 year amortization period for actuarial gains and losses is recorded as a regulatory asset. As ofAt December 31, 2016,2017, the balances were $20$33 million for PPL and LKE, $11$18 million for LG&E and $9$15 million for KU. See Note 6 to the Financial Statements for additional information.

The following tables reflect changes in certain assumptions based on the Registrants' primary defined benefit plans. The tables reflect either an increase or decrease in each assumption. The inverse of this change would impact the accrued defined benefit liabilities or assets, reported annual net periodic defined benefit costs and AOCI or regulatory assets and liabilities by a similar


88


Table of Contents


amount in the opposite direction. The sensitivities below reflect an evaluation of the change based solely on a change in that assumption.
Actuarial assumption 
Discount Rate(0.25%)
Expected Return on Plan Assets(0.25%)
Rate of Compensation Increase0.25 %
Health Care Cost Trend Rate (a)1 %
 
(a)Only impacts other postretirement benefits.
Increase (Decrease) (Increase) Decrease Increase (Decrease) Increase (Decrease)Increase (Decrease) (Increase) Decrease Increase (Decrease) Increase (Decrease)
Actuarial assumption
Defined Benefit
Liabilities
 
AOCI
(pre-tax)
 
Net Regulatory
Assets
 
Defined Benefit
Costs
Defined Benefit
Liabilities
 
AOCI
(pre-tax)
 
Net Regulatory
Assets
 
Defined Benefit
Costs
PPL 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
Discount rate$460
 $361
 $99
 $33
Discount rates$520
 $416
 $104
 $43
Expected return on plan assetsn/a
 n/a
 n/a
 26
n/a
 n/a
 n/a
 27
Rate of compensation increase63
 52
 11
 9
72
 60
 12
 9
Health care cost trend rate (a)5
 1
 4
 
4
 
 4
 
              
PPL Electric 
  
  
   
  
  
  
Discount rate60
 
 60
 4
Discount rates64
 
 64
 4
Expected return on plan assetsn/a
 
 n/a
 4
n/a
 
 n/a
 4
Rate of compensation increase7
 
 7
 1
8
 
 8
 1
Health care cost trend rate (a)1
 
 1
 
1
 
 1
 
 
  
  
   
  
  
  
LKE 
  
  
   
  
  
  
Discount rates64
 25
 39
 5
68
 28
 40
 8
Expected return on plan assetsn/a
 n/a
 n/a
 3
n/a
 n/a
 n/a
 3
Rate of compensation increase8
 4
 4
 1
10
 5
 5
 2
Health care cost trend rate (a)4
 1
 3
 
3
 
 3
 
              
LG&E 
  
  
         
Discount rates21
 n/a
 21
 2
21
 n/a
 21
 3
Expected return on plan assetsn/a
 n/a
 n/a
 1
n/a
 n/a
 n/a
 1
Rate of compensation increase2
 n/a
 2
 
2
 n/a
 2
 
Health care cost trend rate (a)1
 n/a
 1
 
1
 n/a
 1
 
              
KU 
  
  
         
Discount rates18
 n/a
 18
 2
18
 n/a
 18
 2
Expected return on plan assetsn/a
 n/a
 n/a
 1
n/a
 n/a
 n/a
 1
Rate of compensation increase2
 n/a
 2
 
3
 n/a
 3
 
Health care cost trend rate (a)2
 n/a
 2
 
2
 n/a
 2
 
 
(a)Only impacts other postretirement benefits.

Goodwill Impairment(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level. PPL has determined its reporting units to be at the same level as its reportable segments. LKE, LG&E and KU are individually single operating and reportable segments. A goodwill impairment test is performed annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the reporting unit may be greater than the reporting unit's fair value. Additionally, goodwill is tested for impairment after a portion of goodwill has been allocated to a business to be disposed of.
PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU may elect either to initially make a qualitative evaluation about the likelihood of an impairment of goodwill or to bypass the qualitative evaluation and test goodwill for impairment using a two-step quantitative test. If the qualitative evaluation (referred to as "step zero") is elected and the assessment results in a determination that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying amount, the two-step quantitative impairment test is not necessary.

Table of Contents

When the two-step quantitative impairment test is elected or required as a result of the step zero assessment, in step one, PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU determine whether a potential impairment exists by comparing the estimated fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill, on the measurement date. If the estimated fair value exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill is not considered impaired. If the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value, the second step is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any.
The second step of the quantitative test requires a calculation of the implied fair value of goodwill, which is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill in a business combination. That is, the estimated fair value of a reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of that reporting unit as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the estimated fair value of the reporting unit was the price paid to acquire the reporting unit. The excess of the estimated fair value of a reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill. The implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill is then compared with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount exceeds the implied fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The loss recognized cannot exceed the carrying amount of the reporting unit's goodwill.
PPL's goodwill was $3.1 billion at December 31, 2016, which consists of $2.4 billion related to the acquisition of WPD and $662 million related to the acquisition of LKE. PPL (for its U.K. Regulated and Kentucky Regulated segments), and individually, LKE, LG&E and KU elected to perform the qualitative step zero evaluation of goodwill in the fourth quarter of 2016. These evaluations considered the excess of fair value over the carrying value of each reporting unit that was calculated during step one of the quantitative impairment tests performed in the fourth quarter of 2015, and the relevant events and circumstances that occurred since those tests were performed including:

current year financial performance versus the prior year,
changes in planned capital expenditures,
the consistency of forecasted free cash flows,
earnings quality and sustainability,
changes in market participant discount rates,
changes in long-term growth rates,
changes in PPL's market capitalization, and
the overall economic and regulatory environments in which these regulated entities operate.

Based on these evaluations, management concluded it was not more likely than not that the fair value of these reporting units was less than their carrying values. As such, the two-step quantitative impairment test was not performed.  
Asset Retirement Obligations(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
ARO liabilities are required to be recognized for legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets. The initial obligation is measured at its estimated fair value. An ARO must be recognized when incurred if the fair value of the ARO can be reasonably estimated. An equivalent amount is recorded as an increase in the value of the capitalized asset and amortized to expense over the useful life of the asset. For LKE, LG&E and KU, all ARO accretion and depreciation expenses are reclassified as a regulatory asset. ARO regulatory assets associated with approved ECR projects for CCRs are amortized to expense over a period of 10 to 25 years based on retirement expenditures made related to the obligation. For other AROs, at the time of retirement, the related ARO regulatory asset is offset against the associated cost of removal regulatory liability, PP&E and ARO liability.
See Note 19 to the Financial Statements for additional information on AROs.

In determining AROs, management must make significant judgments and estimates to calculate fair value. Fair value is developed using an expected present value technique based on assumptions of market participants that consider estimated retirement costs in current period dollars that are inflated to the anticipated retirement date and then discounted back to the date the ARO was incurred. Changes in assumptions and estimates included within the calculations of the fair value of AROs could result in significantly different results than those identified and recorded in the financial statements. Estimated ARO costs and settlement dates, which affect the carrying value of the ARO and the related capitalized asset, are reviewed periodically to ensure that any material changes are incorporated into the latest estimate of the ARO. Any change to the capitalized asset, positive or negative, is generally amortized over the remaining life of the associated long-lived asset.

Table of Contents

At December 31, 2016, the total recorded balances and information on the most significant recorded AROs were as follows. 
   Most Significant AROs
 
Total
ARO
Recorded
 
Amount
Recorded
 % of Total Description
PPL$488
 $337
 69
 Ash ponds, landfills and natural gas mains
LKE433
 337
 78
 Ash ponds, landfills and natural gas mains
LG&E145
 84
 58
 Ash ponds, landfills and natural gas mains
KU288
 253
 88
 Ash ponds and landfills
The most significant assumptions surrounding AROs are the forecasted retirement costs (including the settlement dates and the timing of cash flows), the discount rates and the inflation rates. At December 31, 2016, a 10% increase to retirement cost would increase the ARO liabilities by $36 million. A 0.25% decrease in the discount rate would increase the ARO liabilities by $5 million and a 0.25% increase in the inflation rate would increase the ARO liabilities by $5 million. There would be no significant change to the annual depreciation expense of the ARO asset or the annual accretion expense of the ARO liability as a result of these changes in assumptions.
Income Taxes (All Registrants)
 
The Registrants have completed or made reasonable estimates of the effects of the TCJA and reflected these amounts in their December 31, 2017 financial statements. The Registrants continue to evaluate the application of the TCJA and have used significant management judgment to make certain assumptions concerning the application of various components of the law in the calculation of 2017 income tax expense. The current and deferred components of the income tax expense calculations that the Registrants consider provisional due to uncertainty either with respect to the technical application of the law or the quantification of the impact of the law include (but are not limited to): tax depreciation, deductible executive compensation, and the accumulated foreign earnings used to calculate the deemed dividend included in PPL's taxable income in 2017 along with the impact of associated foreign tax credits and related valuation allowances. The Registrants believe that classification of these items as provisional is appropriate. The Registrants have accounted for these items based on their interpretation of the TCJA.


89


Table of Contents


Further interpretive guidance on the TCJA from the IRS, Treasury, the Joint Committee on Taxation through its "Blue Book" or from Congress in the form of Technical Corrections may differ from the Registrants' interpretation of the TCJA.

Significant management judgment is also required in developing the Registrants' provision for income taxes, primarily due to the uncertainty related to tax positions taken or expected to be taken in tax returns, valuation allowances on deferred tax assets and whether the undistributed earnings of WPD are considered indefinitely reinvested.
 
Significant management judgment is required to determine the amount of benefit recognized related to an uncertain tax position. Tax positions are evaluated following a two-step process. The first step requires an entity to determine whether, based on the technical merits supporting a particular tax position, it is more likely than not (greater than a 50% chance) that the tax position will be sustained. This determination assumes that the relevant taxing authority will examine the tax position and is aware of all the relevant facts surrounding the tax position. The second step requires an entity to recognize in the financial statements the benefit of a tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition criterion. The benefit recognized is measured at the largest amount of benefit that has a likelihood of realization, upon settlement, that exceeds 50%. Management considers a number of factors in assessing the benefit to be recognized, including negotiation of a settlement.
 
On a quarterly basis, uncertain tax positions are reassessed by considering information known as of the reporting date. Based on management's assessment of new information, a tax benefit may subsequently be recognized for a previously unrecognized tax position, a previously recognized tax position may be derecognized, or the benefit of a previously recognized tax position may be remeasured. The amounts ultimately paid upon resolution of issues raised by taxing authorities may differ materially from the amounts accrued and may materially impact the financial statements in the future. Unrecognized tax benefits are classified as current to the extent management expects to settle an uncertain tax position by payment or receipt of cash within one year of the reporting date.
 
At December 31, 2016,2017, no significant changes in unrecognized tax benefits are projected over the next 12 months.
 
The need for valuation allowances to reduce deferred tax assets also requires significant management judgment. Valuation allowances are initially recorded and reevaluated each reporting period by assessing the likelihood of the ultimate realization of a deferred tax asset. Management considers a number of factors in assessing the realization of a deferred tax asset, including the reversal of temporary differences, future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. Any tax planning strategy utilized in this assessment must meet the recognition and measurement criteria utilized to account for an uncertain tax position. Management also considers the uncertainty posed by political risk and the effect of this uncertainty on the various factors that management takes into account in evaluating the need for valuation allowances. The amount of deferred tax assets ultimately realized may differ materially from the estimates utilized in the computation of valuation allowances and may materially impact the financial statements in the future.
 
See Note 5 to the Financial Statements for income tax disclosures, including the impact of the TCJA and management's conclusion that the undistributed earnings of WPD are considered indefinitely reinvested. Based on this conclusion, PPL Global does not record U.S. federal income taxes on WPD's undistributed earnings.

Table of Contents

Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
(PPL)
WPD operates in an incentive-based regulatory structure under distribution licenses granted by Ofgem. As the regulatory model is incentive-based rather than a cost recovery model, WPD is not subject to accounting for the effects of certain types of regulation as prescribed by GAAP for entities subject to cost-based rate regulation. Therefore, the accounting treatment of adjustments to base demand revenue and/or allowed revenue is evaluated based on revenue recognition and contingency guidance. See Note 1 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
 
(All Registrants)
 
PPL Electric, LG&E and KU, are subject to cost-based rate regulation. As a result, the effects of regulatory actions are required to be reflected in the financial statements. Assets and liabilities are recorded that result from the regulated ratemaking process that may not be recorded under GAAP for non-regulated entities. Regulatory assets generally represent incurred costs that have been deferred because such costs are probable of future recovery in regulated customer rates. Regulatory liabilities are recognized for amounts expected to be returned through future regulated customer rates. In certain cases, regulatory liabilities are recorded based on an understanding or agreement with the regulator that rates have been set to recover costs that are expected to be incurred in the future, and the regulated entity is accountable for any amounts charged pursuant to such rates and not yet expended for the intended purpose.
 
Management continually assesses whether the regulatory assets are probable of future recovery by considering factors such as changes in the applicable regulatory and political environments, the ability to recover costs through regulated rates, recent rate orders to other regulated entities, and the status of any pending or potential deregulation legislation. Based on this continual assessment, management believes the existing regulatory assets are probable of recovery. This assessment reflects the current political and regulatory climate at the state and federal levels, and is subject to change in the future. If future recovery of costs


90


Table of Contents


ceases to be probable, the regulatory asset would be written-off. Additionally, the regulatory agencies can provide flexibility in the manner and timing of recovery of regulatory assets.
 
At December 31, 2016,See Note 6 to the Financial Statements for regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities were recorded at December 31, 2017 and 2016, as reflected in the table below.well as additional information on those regulatory assets and liabilities. All regulatory assets are either currently being recovered under specific rate orders, represent amounts that are expected to be recovered in future rates or benefit future periods based upon established regulatory practices.

(PPL)
WPD operates in an incentive-based regulatory structure under distribution licenses granted by Ofgem. As the regulatory model is incentive-based rather than a cost recovery model, WPD is not subject to accounting for the effects of certain types of regulation as prescribed by GAAP for entities subject to cost-based rate regulation. Therefore, the accounting treatment of adjustments to base demand revenue and/or allowed revenue is primarily evaluated based on revenue recognition guidance. See Note 1 to the Financial Statements for additional information.

Price Risk Management(PPL)
See "Financial Condition - Risk Management" above, as well as "Price Risk Management" in Note 1 to the Financial Statements.

Goodwill Impairment(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level. PPL has determined its reporting units to be at the same level as its reportable segments. LKE, LG&E and KU are individually single operating and reportable segments. A goodwill impairment test is performed annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the reporting unit may be greater than the reporting unit's fair value. Additionally, goodwill is tested for impairment after a portion of goodwill has been allocated to a business to be disposed of.
PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU may elect either to initially make a qualitative evaluation about the likelihood of an impairment of goodwill or to bypass the qualitative evaluation and test goodwill for impairment using a two-step quantitative test. If the qualitative evaluation (referred to as "step zero") is elected and the assessment results in a determination that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying amount, the two-step quantitative impairment test is not necessary.
When the two-step quantitative impairment test is elected or required as a result of the step zero assessment, in step one, PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU determine whether a potential impairment exists by comparing the estimated fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill, on the measurement date. If the estimated fair value exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill is not considered impaired. If the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value, the second step is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any.
The second step of the quantitative test requires a calculation of the implied fair value of goodwill, which is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill in a business combination. That is, the estimated fair value of a reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of that reporting unit as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the estimated fair value of the reporting unit was the price paid to acquire the reporting unit. The excess of the estimated fair value of a reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill. The implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill is then compared with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount exceeds the implied fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The loss recognized cannot exceed the carrying amount of the reporting unit's goodwill.
PPL's goodwill was $3.3 billion at December 31, 2017, which consists of $2.6 billion related to the acquisition of WPD and $662 million related to the acquisition of LKE. PPL (for its U.K. Regulated and Kentucky Regulated segments), and individually, LKE, LG&E and KU elected to perform the qualitative step zero evaluation of goodwill, as of October 1, 2017. These evaluations considered the excess of fair value over the carrying value of each reporting unit that was calculated during step one of the quantitative impairment tests performed in the fourth quarter of 2015, and the relevant events and circumstances that occurred since those tests were performed including:

current year financial performance versus the prior year;
changes in planned capital expenditures;


91


Table of Contents

 PPL 
PPL
Electric
 LKE LG&E KU
Regulatory assets$1,957
 $1,113
 $844
 $459
 $385
Regulatory liabilities1,000
 83
 917
 424
 493

the consistency of forecasted free cash flows;
earnings quality and sustainability;
changes in market participant discount rates;
changes in long-term growth rates;
changes in PPL's market capitalization; and
the overall economic and regulatory environments in which these regulated entities operate.

Based on these evaluations, management concluded it was not more likely than not that the fair value of these reporting units was less than their carrying values. As such, the two-step quantitative impairment test was not performed. 
Asset Retirement Obligations(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
ARO liabilities are required to be recognized for legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets. The initial obligation is measured at its estimated fair value. An ARO must be recognized when incurred if the fair value of the ARO can be reasonably estimated. An equivalent amount is recorded as an increase in the value of the capitalized asset and amortized to expense over the useful life of the asset. For LKE, LG&E and KU, all ARO accretion and depreciation expenses are reclassified as a regulatory asset. ARO regulatory assets associated with certain CCR projects are amortized to expense in accordance with regulatory approvals. For other AROs, at the time of retirement, the related ARO regulatory asset is offset against the associated cost of removal regulatory liability, PP&E and ARO liability.
 
See Note 619 to the Financial Statements for additional information on regulatory assetsAROs.

In determining AROs, management must make significant judgments and liabilities.estimates to calculate fair value. Fair value is developed using an expected present value technique based on assumptions of market participants that consider estimated retirement costs in current period dollars that are inflated to the anticipated retirement date and then discounted back to the date the ARO was incurred. Changes in assumptions and estimates included within the calculations of the fair value of AROs could result in significantly different results than those identified and recorded in the financial statements. Estimated ARO costs and settlement dates, which affect the carrying value of the ARO and the related capitalized asset, are reviewed periodically to ensure that any material changes are incorporated into the latest estimate of the ARO. Any change to the capitalized asset, positive or negative, is generally amortized over the remaining life of the associated long-lived asset.

At December 31, 2017, the total recorded balances and information on the most significant recorded AROs were as follows. 
   Most Significant AROs
 
Total
ARO
Recorded
 
Amount
Recorded
 % of Total Description
PPL$397
 $284
 72
 Ponds, landfills and natural gas mains
LKE356
 284
 80
 Ponds, landfills and natural gas mains
LG&E121
 89
 74
 Ponds, landfills and natural gas mains
KU235
 195
 83
 Ponds and landfills
The most significant assumptions surrounding AROs are the forecasted retirement costs (including the settlement dates and the timing of cash flows), the discount rates and the inflation rates. At December 31, 2017, a 10% increase to retirement cost would increase these ARO liabilities by $32 million. A 0.25% decrease in the discount rate would increase these ARO liabilities by $4 million and a 0.25% increase in the inflation rate would increase these ARO liabilities by $2 million. There would be no significant change to the annual depreciation expense of the ARO asset or the annual accretion expense of the ARO liability as a result of these changes in assumptions. 
 
Revenue Recognition - Unbilled RevenueRevenues (LKE, LG&E and KU)
 
Revenues related to the sale of energy are recorded when service is rendered or when energy is delivered to customers. Because customers are billed on cycles which vary based on the timing of the actual meter reads taken throughout the month, estimates are recorded for unbilled revenues at the end of each reporting period. For LG&E and KU, such unbilled revenue amounts reflect estimates of deliveries to customers since the date of the last reading of their meters. The unbilled revenue estimates reflect consideration of factors including daily load models, estimated usage for each customer class, the effect of current and different rate schedules, the meter read schedule, the billing schedule, actual weather data and where applicable, the impact of


92


Table of Contents


weather normalization or other regulatory provisions of rate structures. AtSee "Unbilled revenues" on the Registrants' Balance Sheets for balances at December 31, unbilled revenues recorded on the Balance Sheets were as follows.
 2016 2015
LKE$170
 $147
LG&E75
 67
KU95
 80
2017 and 2016.
 


Other Information (All Registrants)
 
PPL's Audit Committee has approved the independent auditor to provide audit and audit-related services, tax services and other services permitted by Sarbanes-Oxley and SEC rules. The audit and audit-related services include services in connection with statutory and regulatory filings, reviews of offering documents and registration statements, and internal control reviews.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
 
PPL Corporation, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company
 
Reference is made to "Risk Management" for the Registrants in "Item 7. Combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."



93





REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareowners and the Board of Directors and Shareowners of PPL Corporation

Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsheets of PPL Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows, for the yearyears then ended. Our audit also includedended, and the financial statementrelated notes and the schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 as listed in the Index at Item 15. 15 (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 22, 2018, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audit.

audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our auditaudits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includesmisstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An auditOur audits also includes assessingincluded evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audit providesaudits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of PPL Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 17, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Parsippany, NJNew Jersey  
February 22, 2018  

February 17, 2017We have served as the Company's auditor since 2015.














94




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareowners and the Board of Directors and Shareowners of PPL Corporation
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of PPL Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2016,2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control-IntegratedControl – Integrated Framework (2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017, of the Company and our report dated February 22, 2018, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company'sCompany’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting at Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of theits inherent limitations, of internal control over financial reporting including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be preventedprevent or detected on a timely basis.detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 of the Company, and our report dated February 17, 2017, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedule.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Parsippany, NJNew Jersey
February 22, 2018

February 17, 2017

95




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
The Board of Directors and Shareowners of PPL Corporation
 
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of PPL Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows of PPL Corporation and subsidiaries for each of the two years in the periodyear ended December 31, 2015. Our auditsaudit also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(2) as of December 31, 2015 and for each of the two years in the periodyear ended December 31, 2015. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.audit.
 
We conducted our auditsaudit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provideaudit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial positionresults of operations and cash flows of PPL Corporation and subsidiaries at December 31, 2015, andfor the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the periodyear ended December 31, 2015, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule as of December 31, 2015 and for each of the two years in the periodyear ended December 31, 2015, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
 
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), PPL Corporation and subsidiaries' internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 19, 2016, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

 
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
 
 
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
February 19, 2016


























96




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareowner and the Board of Directors and Shareowner of PPL Electric Utilities Corporation

Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsheets of PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of income, equity, and cash flows for the yearyears then ended. ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audit.

audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our auditaudits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included considerationAs part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audit providesaudits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Parsippany, NJNew Jersey  
February 22, 2018  

February 17, 2017We have served as the Company's auditor since 2015.



97




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
The Board of Directors and Shareowner of PPL Electric Utilities Corporation
 
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetstatements of income, equity, and cash flows of PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015, andfor the related consolidated statements of income, equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the periodyear ended December 31, 2015. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.audit.
 
We conducted our auditsaudit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Our auditsaudit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provideaudit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial positionresults of operations and cash flows of PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and subsidiaries at December 31, 2015, andfor the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the periodyear ended December 31, 2015, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
 
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
 
 
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
February 19, 2016



98




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Sole Member and the Board of Directors and Sole Member of LG&E and KU Energy LLC

Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsheets of LG&E and KU Energy LLC and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows, for the yearyears then ended. Our audit also includedended, and the financial statementrelated notes and the schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 as listed in the Index at Item 15. 15 (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audit.

audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our auditaudits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included considerationAs part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audit providesaudits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of LG&E and KU Energy LLC and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Louisville, Kentucky

February 17, 201722, 2018

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2015.



99




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
The Board of Directors and Sole Member of LG&E and KU Energy LLC
 
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetstatements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows of LG&E and KU Energy LLC and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015, andfor the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the periodyear ended December 31, 2015. Our auditsaudit also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(2) as of December 31, 2015 and for each of the two years in the periodyear ended December 31, 2015. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.audit.

We conducted our auditsaudit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Our auditsaudit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provideaudit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial positionresults of operations and cash flows of LG&E and KU Energy LLC and subsidiaries at December 31, 2015, andfor the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the periodyear ended December 31, 2015, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule as of December 31, 2015 and for each of the two yearsyear ended December 31, 2015, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

 
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
 
 
Louisville, Kentucky
February 19, 2016



100




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholder and the Board of Directors and Stockholder of Louisville Gas and Electric Company

Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying balance sheetsheets of Louisville Gas and Electric Company (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related statements of income, equity, and cash flows, for the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Louisville, Kentucky
February 22, 2018

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2015.



101




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholder of Louisville Gas and Electric Company
We have audited the accompanying statements of income, equity and cash flows of Louisville Gas and Electric Company for the year then ended.ended December 31, 2015. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Louisville, Kentucky

February 17, 2017



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholder of Louisville Gas and Electric Company
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Louisville Gas and Electric Company as of December 31, 2015, and the related statements of income, equity and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2015. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Our auditsaudit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provideaudit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial positionresults of operations and cash flows of Louisville Gas and Electric Company at December 31, 2015, andfor the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the periodyear ended December 31, 2015, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
 
 
Louisville, Kentucky
February 19, 2016




102




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholder and the Board of Directors and Stockholder of Kentucky Utilities Company

Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying balance sheetsheets of Kentucky Utilities Company (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related statements of income, equity, and cash flows, for the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Louisville, Kentucky
February 22, 2018
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2015.



103




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholder of Kentucky Utilities Company
We have audited the statements of income, equity and cash flows of Kentucky Utilities Company for the year then ended.ended December 31, 2015. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Louisville, Kentucky

February 17, 2017



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholder of Kentucky Utilities Company
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Kentucky Utilities Company as of December 31, 2015, and the related statements of income, equity and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2015. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Our auditsaudit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provideaudit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial positionresults of operations and cash flows of Kentucky Utilities Company at December 31, 2015, andfor the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the periodyear ended December 31, 2015, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

 
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
 
 
Louisville, Kentucky
February 19, 2016





104






















(THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY.)




105




ITEM 8.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Millions of Dollars, except share data)

2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Operating Revenues$7,517
 $7,669
 $7,852
$7,447
 $7,517
 $7,669
          
Operating Expenses 
  
  
 
  
  
Operation 
    
 
    
Fuel791
 863
 965
759
 791
 863
Energy purchases706
 855
 924
685
 706
 855
Other operation and maintenance1,745
 1,938
 1,856
1,635
 1,745
 1,938
Depreciation926
 883
 923
1,008
 926
 883
Taxes, other than income301
 299
 317
292
 301
 299
Total Operating Expenses4,469
 4,838
 4,985
4,379
 4,469
 4,838
          
Operating Income3,048
 2,831
 2,867
3,068
 3,048
 2,831
          
Other Income (Expense) - net390
 108
 105
(255) 390
 108
          
Interest Expense888
 871
 843
901
 888
 871
          
Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes2,550
 2,068
 2,129
1,912
 2,550
 2,068
          
Income Taxes648
 465
 692
784
 648
 465
          
Income from Continuing Operations After Income Taxes1,902
 1,603
 1,437
1,128
 1,902
 1,603
          
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations (net of income taxes) (Note 8)
 (921) 300
Loss from Discontinued Operations (net of income taxes) (Note 8)
 
 (921)
          
Net Income$1,902
 $682
 $1,737
$1,128
 $1,902
 $682
          
Earnings Per Share of Common Stock:  
Income from Continuing Operations After Income Taxes Available to PPL Common Shareowners:  
Basic$2.80
 $2.38
 $2.19
$1.64
 $2.80
 $2.38
Diluted$2.79
 $2.37
 $2.16
$1.64
 $2.79
 $2.37
Net Income Available to PPL Common Shareowners: 
  
  
 
  
  
Basic$2.80
 $1.01
 $2.64
$1.64
 $2.80
 $1.01
Diluted$2.79
 $1.01
 $2.61
$1.64
 $2.79
 $1.01
          
Dividends Declared Per Share of Common Stock$1.52
 $1.50
 $1.49
$1.58
 $1.52
 $1.50
          
Weighted-Average Shares of Common Stock Outstanding (in thousands)   
  
   
  
Basic677,592
 669,814
 653,504
685,240
 677,592
 669,814
Diluted680,446
 672,586
 665,973
687,334
 680,446
 672,586
 
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.



106


Table of Contents


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Millions of Dollars)

2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Net income$1,902
 $682
 $1,737
$1,128
 $1,902
 $682
          
Other comprehensive income (loss): 
  
  
 
  
  
Amounts arising during the period - gains (losses), net of tax (expense) benefit: 
  
  
 
  
  
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax of ($4), $1, ($8)(1,107) (234) (275)
Available-for-sale securities, net of tax of $0, ($9), ($39)
 8
 35
Qualifying derivatives, net of tax of ($18), $0, $2391
 26
 (10)
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax of ($1), ($4), $1538
 (1,107) (234)
Available-for-sale securities, net of tax of $0, $0, ($9)
 
 8
Qualifying derivatives, net of tax of $19, ($18), $0(79) 91
 26
Defined benefit plans: 
  
  
 
  
  
Prior service costs, net of tax of $2, $6, ($4)(3) (9) 5
Net actuarial gain (loss), net of tax of $40, $67, $225(61) (366) (509)
Prior service costs, net of tax of $0, $2, $6
 (3) (9)
Net actuarial gain (loss), net of tax of $72, $40, $67(308) (61) (366)
Reclassifications to net income - (gains) losses, net of tax expense (benefit): 
  
  
 
  
  
Available-for-sale securities, net of tax of $0, $2, $7
 (2) (6)
Qualifying derivatives, net of tax of $21, ($15), $23(91) 2
 (64)
Available-for-sale securities, net of tax of $0, $0, $2
 
 (2)
Qualifying derivatives, net of tax of ($18), $21, ($15)73
 (91) 2
Equity investees' other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax of $0, $0, $0(1) (1) 
1
 (1) (1)
Defined benefit plans: 
  
  
 
  
  
Prior service costs, net of tax of ($1), $0, ($3)1
 
 4
Net actuarial (gain) loss, net of tax of ($35), ($46), ($34)121
 146
 111
Prior service costs, net of tax of ($1), ($1), $01
 1
 
Net actuarial (gain) loss, net of tax of ($37), ($35), ($46)130
 121
 146
Total other comprehensive income (loss)(1,050) (430) (709)356
 (1,050) (430)
          
Comprehensive income$852
 $252
 $1,028
$1,484
 $852
 $252
 
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.



107


Table of Contents


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Millions of Dollars)
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Cash Flows from Operating Activities 
  
  
 
  
  
Net income$1,902
 $682
 $1,737
$1,128
 $1,902
 $682
Loss (income) from discontinued operations (net of income taxes)
 921
 (300)
Loss from discontinued operations (net of income taxes)
 
 921
Income from continuing operations (net of income taxes)1,902
 1,603
 1,437
1,128
 1,902
 1,603
Adjustments to reconcile Income from continuing operations (net of taxes) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities- continuing operations 
  
  
Adjustments to reconcile Income from continuing operations (net of taxes) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities - continuing operations 
  
  
Depreciation926
 883
 923
1,008
 926
 883
Amortization80
 59
 65
97
 80
 59
Defined benefit plans - expense (income)(40) 56
 48
(95) (40) 56
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits560
 428
 666
707
 560
 428
Unrealized (gains) losses on derivatives, and other hedging activities19
 (77) (187)178
 19
 (77)
Adjustment to WPD line loss accrual
 
 65
Stock compensation expense38
 28
 31
Other16
 17
 66
(9) (12) (14)
Change in current assets and current liabilities 
  
  
 
  
  
Accounts receivable(15) 47
 (123)(33) (15) 47
Accounts payable57
 (116) 40
(10) 57
 (116)
Unbilled revenues(63) 54
 22
(48) (63) 54
Prepayments(4) (23) 87
Fuel, materials and supplies40
 (3) 24
Taxes payable31
 (175) 161
3
 31
 (175)
Regulatory assets and liabilities, net(59) 42
 (7)(12) (59) 42
Other(31) 40
 30
14
 (32) (7)
Other operating activities 
  
  
 
  
  
Defined benefit plans - funding(427) (499) (384)(565) (427) (499)
Settlement of interest rate swaps(9) (101) 
2
 (9) (101)
Other assets42
 (19) 9
30
 42
 (19)
Other liabilities(95) 53
 23
(12) (95) 53
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities - continuing operations2,890
 2,272
 2,941
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities - discontinued operations
 343
 462
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities2,890
 2,615
 3,403
Net cash provided by operating activities - continuing operations2,461
 2,890
 2,272
Net cash provided by operating activities - discontinued operations
 
 343
Net cash provided by operating activities2,461
 2,890
 2,615
Cash Flows from Investing Activities 
  
  
 
  
  
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment(2,920) (3,533) (3,674)(3,133) (2,920) (3,533)
Expenditures for intangible assets(37) (37) (49)(38) (37) (37)
Purchases of other investments
 
 (120)
Proceeds from the sale of other investments2
 136
 

 2
 136
Net decrease in restricted cash and cash equivalents8
 8
 19
Other investing activities29
 (13) (2)15
 37
 (5)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities - continuing operations(2,918) (3,439) (3,826)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities - discontinued operations
 (149) 497
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities(2,918) (3,588) (3,329)
Net cash used in investing activities - continuing operations(3,156) (2,918) (3,439)
Net cash used in investing activities - discontinued operations
 
 (149)
Net cash used in investing activities(3,156) (2,918) (3,588)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities 
  
  
 
  
  
Issuance of long-term debt1,342
 2,236
 296
1,515
 1,342
 2,236
Retirement of long-term debt(930) (1,000) (237)(168) (930) (1,000)
Settlement of cross currency swaps46
 
 
Issuance of common stock144
 203
 1,074
453
 144
 203
Payment of common stock dividends(1,030) (1,004) (967)(1,072) (1,030) (1,004)
Net increase in short-term debt29
 94
 147
115
 29
 94
Other financing activities(40) (47) (51)(19) 6
 (47)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities - continuing operations(439) 482
 262
824
 (439) 482
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities - discontinued operations
 (546) (846)
Net cash used in financing activities - discontinued operations
 
 (546)
Net cash distributions to parent from discontinued operations
 132
 1,167

 
 132
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities(439) 68
 583
824
 (439) 68
Effect of Exchange Rates on Cash and Cash Equivalents(28) (10) (8)15
 (28) (10)
Net (Increase) Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents included in Discontinued Operations
 352
 (113)
 
 352
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents(495) (563) 536
144
 (495) (563)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period836
 1,399
 863
341
 836
 1,399
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period$341
 $836
 $1,399
$485
 $341
 $836
          
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information          
Cash paid (received) during the period for:          
Interest - net of amount capitalized$854
 $822
 $959
$845
 $854
 $822
Income taxes - net$70
 $179
 $190
$65
 $70
 $179
Significant non-cash transactions:          
Accrued expenditures for property, plant and equipment at December 31,$281
 $310
 $458
$360
 $281
 $310
Accrued expenditures for intangible assets at December 31,$117
 $55
 $19
$68
 $117
 $55

 The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.


108


Table of Contents


CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT DECEMBER 31,
PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Millions of Dollars, shares in thousands)
2016 20152017 2016
Assets 
  
 
  
Current Assets 
  
 
  
Cash and cash equivalents$341
 $836
$485
 $341
Accounts receivable (less reserve: 2016, $54; 2015, $41) 
  
Accounts receivable (less reserve: 2017, $51; 2016, $54) 
  
Customer666
 673
681
 666
Other46
 59
100
 46
Unbilled revenues480
 453
543
 480
Fuel, materials and supplies356
 357
320
 356
Prepayments63
 66
66
 63
Price risk management assets63
 139
49
 63
Other current assets52
 63
50
 52
Total Current Assets2,067
 2,646
2,294
 2,067
      
Property, Plant and Equipment 
  
 
  
Regulated utility plant34,674
 34,399
38,228
 34,674
Less: accumulated depreciation - regulated utility plant6,013
 5,683
6,785
 6,013
Regulated utility plant, net28,661
 28,716
31,443
 28,661
Non-regulated property, plant and equipment413
 516
384
 413
Less: accumulated depreciation - non-regulated property, plant and equipment134
 165
110
 134
Non-regulated property, plant and equipment, net279
 351
274
 279
Construction work in progress1,134
 1,315
1,375
 1,134
Property, Plant and Equipment, net30,074
 30,382
33,092
 30,074
      
Other Noncurrent Assets 
  
 
  
Regulatory assets1,918
 1,733
1,504
 1,918
Goodwill3,060
 3,550
3,258
 3,060
Other intangibles700
 679
697
 700
Pension benefit asset284
 9
Price risk management assets336
 156
215
 336
Other noncurrent assets160
 155
135
 151
Total Other Noncurrent Assets6,174
 6,273
6,093
 6,174
      
Total Assets$38,315
 $39,301
$41,479
 $38,315
 
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.


109


Table of Contents


CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT DECEMBER 31,
PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Millions of Dollars, shares in thousands)
2016 20152017 2016
Liabilities and Equity 
  
 
  
Current Liabilities 
  
 
  
Short-term debt$923
 $916
$1,080
 $923
Long-term debt due within one year518
 485
348
 518
Accounts payable820
 812
924
 820
Taxes101
 85
105
 101
Interest270
 303
282
 270
Dividends259
 255
273
 259
Customer deposits276
 326
292
 276
Regulatory liabilities101
 145
95
 101
Other current liabilities569
 549
624
 569
Total Current Liabilities3,837
 3,876
4,023
 3,837
      
Long-term Debt17,808
 18,563
19,847
 17,808
      
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities 
  
 
  
Deferred income taxes3,889
 3,440
2,462
 3,889
Investment tax credits132
 128
129
 132
Accrued pension obligations1,001
 1,405
800
 1,001
Asset retirement obligations428
 536
312
 428
Regulatory liabilities899
 945
2,704
 899
Other deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities422
 489
441
 422
Total Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities6,771
 6,943
6,848
 6,771
      
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Notes 5, 6 and 13)

 

Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Notes 6 and 13)

 

      
Equity 
  
 
  
Common stock - $0.01 par value (a)7
 7
7
 7
Additional paid-in capital9,841
 9,687
10,305
 9,841
Earnings reinvested3,829
 2,953
3,871
 3,829
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(3,778) (2,728)(3,422) (3,778)
Total Equity9,899
 9,919
10,761
 9,899
      
Total Liabilities and Equity$38,315
 $39,301
$41,479
 $38,315
 
(a)1,560,000 shares authorized; 693,398 and 679,731 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016; 780,000 shares authorized; 673,857 shares issued2017 and outstanding at December 31, 2015.2016.

The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.



110


Table of Contents


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Millions of Dollars)

PPL Shareowners  PPL Shareowners  
Common
stock shares outstanding
(a)
 
Common
 stock
 
Additional
paid-in
capital
 
Earnings
reinvested
 
Accumulated other comprehensive
loss
 Total
Common
stock shares outstanding
(a)
 
Common
 stock
 
Additional
paid-in
capital
 
Earnings
reinvested
 
Accumulated other comprehensive
loss
 Total
December 31, 2013630,321
 $6
 $8,316
 $5,709
 $(1,565) $12,466
Common stock issued35,528
 1
 1,089
  
  
 1,090
Stock-based compensation 
  
 28
  
  
 28
Net income 
  
  
 1,737
   1,737
Dividends and dividend equivalents 
  
  
 (984)   (984)
Other comprehensive income (loss) 
  
  
  
 (709) (709)
December 31, 2014665,849
 $7
 $9,433
 $6,462
 $(2,274) $13,628
665,849
 $7
 $9,433
 $6,462
 $(2,274) $13,628
           
Common stock issued8,008
 

 249
  
  
 249
8,008
 

 249
  
  
 249
Stock-based compensation 
  
 5
  
  
 5
 
  
 5
  
  
 5
Net income 
  
  
 682
  
 682
 
  
  
 682
   682
Dividends and dividend equivalents 
  
  
 (1,010)  
 (1,010) 
  
  
 (1,010)   (1,010)
Distribution of PPL Energy Supply (Note 8) 
  
  
 (3,181) (24) (3,205)      (3,181) (24) (3,205)
Other comprehensive income (loss) 
  
  
  
 (430) (430) 
  
  
  
 (430) (430)
December 31, 2015673,857
 $7
 $9,687
 $2,953
 $(2,728) $9,919
673,857
 $7
 $9,687
 $2,953
 $(2,728) $9,919
                      
Common stock issued5,874
  
 185
  
  
 185
5,874
 

 185
  
  
 185
Stock-based compensation 
  
 (31)  
  
 (31) 
  
 (31)  
  
 (31)
Net income 
  
  
 1,902
  
 1,902
 
  
  
 1,902
  
 1,902
Dividends and dividend equivalents 
  
  
 (1,033)  
 (1,033) 
  
  
 (1,033)  
 (1,033)
Other comprehensive income (loss) 
  
  
  
 (1,050) (1,050) 
  
  
  
 (1,050) (1,050)
Adoption of stock-based compensation guidance cumulative effect adjustment (Note 1) 
  
  
 7
   7
      7
   7
December 31, 2016679,731
 $7
 $9,841
 $3,829
 $(3,778) $9,899
679,731
 $7
 $9,841
 $3,829
 $(3,778) $9,899
           
Common stock issued13,667
  
 482
  
  
 482
Stock-based compensation 
  
 (18)  
  
 (18)
Net income 
  
  
 1,128
  
 1,128
Dividends and dividend equivalents 
  
  
 (1,086)  
 (1,086)
Other comprehensive income (loss) 
  
  
  
 356
 356
December 31, 2017693,398
 $7
 $10,305
 $3,871
 $(3,422) $10,761
 
(a)Shares in thousands. Each share entitles the holder to one vote on any question presented at any shareowners' meeting.

The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.


111


Table of Contents



























(THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY.)




112


Table of Contents



CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Millions of Dollars)

2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Operating Revenues$2,156
 $2,124
 $2,044
$2,195
 $2,156
 $2,124
          
Operating Expenses 
  
  
 
  
  
Operation 
  
  
 
  
  
Energy purchases535
 657
 587
507
 535
 657
Energy purchases from affiliate
 14
 84

 
 14
Other operation and maintenance599
 607
 543
571
 599
 607
Depreciation253
 214
 185
309
 253
 214
Taxes, other than income105
 94
 107
107
 105
 94
Total Operating Expenses1,492
 1,586
 1,506
1,494
 1,492
 1,586
          
Operating Income664
 538
 538
701
 664
 538
          
Other Income (Expense) - net17
 8
 7
11
 17
 8
          
Interest Income from Affiliate5
 
 
     
Interest Expense129
 130
 122
142
 129
 130
          
Income Before Income Taxes552
 416
 423
575
 552
 416
          
Income Taxes212
 164
 160
213
 212
 164
          
Net Income (a)$340
 $252
 $263
$362
 $340
 $252
 
(a)Net income equals comprehensive income.

The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.



113


Table of Contents


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Millions of Dollars)
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Cash Flows from Operating Activities 
  
  
 
  
  
Net income$340
 $252
 $263
$362
 $340
 $252
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 
  
  
 
  
  
Depreciation253
 214
 185
309
 253
 214
Amortization32
 26
 19
33
 32
 26
Defined benefit plans - expense11
 16
 15
12
 11
 16
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits221
 220
 87
258
 221
 220
Other(13) (12) (23)(8) (13) (12)
Change in current assets and current liabilities 
  
  
 
  
  
Accounts receivable16
 50
 (64)(57) 16
 50
Accounts payable58
 (107) 30
3
 58
 (107)
Unbilled revenues(23) 22
 3
(13) (23) 22
Prepayments43
 (1) 1
3
 43
 (1)
Regulatory assets and liabilities(62) 35
 5
(5) (62) 35
Taxes payable(12) (108) 75
(4) (12) (108)
Other(7) 21
 10
(1) (7) 21
Other operating activities 
  
  
 
  
  
Defined benefit plans - funding
 (33) (23)(24) 
 (33)
Other assets19
 (10) 19
15
 19
 (10)
Other liabilities(4) 17
 11
(3) (4) 17
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities872
 602
 613
Net cash provided by operating activities880
 872
 602
          
Cash Flows from Investing Activities 
  
  
 
  
  
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment(1,125) (1,097) (931)(1,244) (1,125) (1,097)
Expenditures for intangible assets(9) (10) (26)(10) (9) (10)
Net decrease in notes receivable from affiliate
 
 150
Other investing activities4
 (1) 16
2
 4
 (1)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities(1,130) (1,108) (791)
Net cash used in investing activities(1,252) (1,130) (1,108)
          
Cash Flows from Financing Activities 
  
  
 
  
  
Issuance of long-term debt224
 348
 296
470
 224
 348
Retirement of long-term debt(224) (100) (10)
 (224) (100)
Contributions from PPL220
 275
 263
575
 220
 275
Payment of common stock dividends to parent(288) (181) (158)(336) (288) (181)
Net increase (decrease) in short-term debt295
 
 (20)(295) 295
 
Other financing activities(3) (3) (4)(6) (3) (3)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities224
 339
 367
Net cash provided by financing activities408
 224
 339
          
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents(34) (167) 189
36
 (34) (167)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period47
 214
 25
13
 47
 214
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period$13
 $47
 $214
$49
 $13
 $47
          
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information 
  
  
 
  
  
Cash paid (received) during the period for: 
  
  
 
  
  
Interest - net of amount capitalized$115
 $117
 $110
$128
 $115
 $117
Income taxes - net$(48) $38
 $40
$4
 $(48) $38
Significant non-cash transactions:          
Accrued expenditures for property, plant and equipment at December 31,$126
 $98
 $95
$133
 $126
 $98

The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.


114


Table of Contents


CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT DECEMBER 31,
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Millions of Dollars, shares in thousands)

2016 20152017 2016
Assets 
  
 
  
Current Assets 
  
 
  
Cash and cash equivalents$13
 $47
$49
 $13
Accounts receivable (less reserve: 2016, $28; 2015, $16) 
  
Accounts receivable (less reserve: 2017, $24; 2016, $28) 
  
Customer272
 286
279
 272
Other21
 10
71
 21
Unbilled revenues114
 91
127
 114
Materials and supplies32
 34
34
 32
Prepayments9
 66
6
 9
Regulatory assets19

13
16

19
Other current assets8
 8
6
 8
Total Current Assets488
 555
588
 488
      
Property, Plant and Equipment 
  
 
  
Regulated utility plant9,654
 8,734
10,785
 9,654
Less: accumulated depreciation - regulated utility plant2,714
 2,573
2,778
 2,714
Regulated utility plant, net6,940
 6,161
8,007
 6,940
Construction work in progress641
 530
508
 641
Property, Plant and Equipment, net7,581
 6,691
8,515
 7,581
      
Other Noncurrent Assets 
  
 
  
Regulatory assets1,094
 1,006
709
 1,094
Intangibles251
 244
259
 251
Other noncurrent assets12
 15
11
 12
Total Other Noncurrent Assets1,357
 1,265
979
 1,357
      
Total Assets$9,426
 $8,511
$10,082
 $9,426
 
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.




115


Table of Contents


CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT DECEMBER 31,
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Millions of Dollars, shares in thousands)

2016 20152017 2016
Liabilities and Equity 
  
 
  
Current Liabilities 
  
 
  
Short-term debt$295
 $
$
 $295
Long-term debt due within one year224
 

 224
Accounts payable367
 288
386
 367
Accounts payable to affiliates42
 35
31
 42
Taxes12
 24
8
 12
Interest34
 37
36
 34
Customer deposits23
 31
Regulatory liabilities83
 113
86
 83
Other current liabilities78
 77
98
 101
Total Current Liabilities1,158
 605
645
 1,158
      
Long-term Debt2,607
 2,828
3,298
 2,607
      
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities 
  
 
  
Deferred income taxes1,899
 1,663
1,154
 1,899
Accrued pension obligations281
 183
246
 281
Regulatory liabilities
 22
668
 
Other deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities90
 91
79
 90
Total Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities2,270
 1,959
2,147
 2,270
      
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Notes 6 and 13)

 



 

      
Equity 
  
 
  
Common stock - no par value (a)364
 364
364
 364
Additional paid-in capital2,154
 1,934
2,729
 2,154
Earnings reinvested873
 821
899
 873
Total Equity3,391
 3,119
3,992
 3,391
      
Total Liabilities and Equity$9,426
 $8,511
$10,082
 $9,426
 
(a)170,000 shares authorized; 66,368 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 20162017 and 2015.December 31, 2016.

The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.



116


Table of Contents


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Millions of Dollars)

Common stock shares outstanding
(a)
 
Common
stock
 
Additional paid-in
capital
 
Earnings
reinvested
 Total
Common stock shares outstanding
(a)
 
Common
stock
 
Additional paid-in
capital
 
Earnings
reinvested
 Total
December 31, 201366,368
 $364
 $1,340
 $645
 $2,349
Net income 
  
  
 263
 263
Capital contributions from PPL 
  
 263
  
 263
Dividends declared on common stock 
  
  
 (158) (158)
December 31, 201466,368
 $364
 $1,603
 $750
 $2,717
66,368
 $364
 $1,603
 $750
 $2,717
         
Net income 
  
  
 252
 252
 
  
  
 252
 252
Capital contributions from PPL (b) 
  
 331
  
 331
 
  
 331
  
 331
Dividends declared on common stock 
  
  
 (181) (181) 
  
  
 (181) (181)
December 31, 201566,368
 $364
 $1,934
 $821
 $3,119
66,368
 $364
 $1,934
 $821
 $3,119
                  
Net income 
  
  
 340
 340
 
  
  
 340
 340
Capital contributions from PPL (b) 
  
 220
  
 220
Dividends declared on common stock 
  
  
 (288) (288)
December 31, 201666,368
 $364
 $2,154
 $873
 $3,391
         
Net income 
  
  
 362
 362
Capital contributions from PPL 
  
 220
  
 220
 
  
 575
  
 575
Dividends declared on common stock 
  
  
 (288) (288) 
  
  
 (336) (336)
December 31, 201666,368
 $364
 $2,154
 $873
 $3,391
December 31, 201766,368
 $364
 $2,729
 $899
 $3,992
 
(a)Shares in thousands. All common shares of PPL Electric stock are owned by PPL.
(b)Includes non-cash contributions of $56 million. See Note 11 for additional information.

The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.



117


Table of Contents



CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
LG&E and KU Energy LLC and Subsidiaries
(Millions of Dollars)

2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Operating Revenues$3,141
 $3,115
 $3,168
$3,156
 $3,141
 $3,115
          
Operating Expenses 
  
   
  
  
Operation 
  
   
  
  
Fuel791
 863
 965
759
 791
 863
Energy purchases171
 184
 253
178
 171
 184
Other operation and maintenance804
 837
 815
806
 804
 837
Depreciation404
 382
 354
439
 404
 382
Taxes, other than income62
 57
 52
65
 62
 57
Total Operating Expenses2,232
 2,323
 2,439
2,247
 2,232
 2,323
          
Operating Income909
 792
 729
909
 909
 792
          
Other Income (Expense) - net(9) (8) (9)(3) (9) (8)
          
Interest Expense197
 178
 167
197
 197
 178
          
Interest Expense with Affiliate17
 3
 
18
 17
 3
          
Income Before Income Taxes686
 603
 553
691
 686
 603
          
Income Taxes257
 239
 209
375
 257
 239
          
Net Income$429
 $364
 $344
$316
 $429
 $364
 
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.


118


Table of Contents


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
LG&E and KU Energy LLC and Subsidiaries
(Millions of Dollars)

2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Net income$429
 $364
 $344
$316
 $429
 $364
          
Other comprehensive income (loss): 
  
  
 
  
  
Amounts arising during the period - gains (losses), net of tax (expense) benefit: 
  
  
 
  
  
Defined benefit plans: 
  
  
 
  
  
Prior service costs, net of tax of $0, $2, $4
 (3) (7)
Net actuarial gain (loss), net of tax of $18, $2, $32(27) (4) (50)
Reclassification from AOCI - (gains) losses, net of tax expense (benefit): 
  
  
Prior service costs, net of tax of $1, $0, $2(2) 
 (3)
Net actuarial gain (loss), net of tax of $13, $18, $2(23) (27) (4)
Reclassifications to net income - (gains) losses, net of tax expense (benefit): 
  
  
Equity investees' other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax of $0, $0, $0(1) 
 (1)1
 (1) 
Defined benefit plans: 
  
  
 
  
  
Prior service costs, net of tax of ($1), ($1), $02
 1
 1
Net actuarial (gain) loss, net of tax of ($1), ($3), $02
 5
 (1)
Prior service costs, net of tax of ($1), ($1), ($1)1
 2
 1
Net actuarial (gain) loss, net of tax of ($2), ($1), ($3)5
 2
 5
Total other comprehensive income (loss)(24) (1) (58)(18) (24) (1)
          
Comprehensive income$405
 $363
 $286
$298
 $405
 $363
 
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.


119


Table of Contents


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
LG&E and KU Energy LLC and Subsidiaries
(Millions of Dollars)
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Cash Flows from Operating Activities 
  
  
 
  
  
Net income$429
 $364
 $344
$316
 $429
 $364
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 
  
  
 
  
  
Depreciation404
 382
 354
439
 404
 382
Amortization29
 27
 25
24
 29
 27
Defined benefit plans - expense27
 38
 25
25
 27
 38
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits291
 236
 449
294
 291
 236
Other
 2
 16

 
 2
Change in current assets and current liabilities 
  
  
 
  
  
Accounts receivable(31) 24
 (20)(12) (31) 24
Accounts payable24
 (58) 12
(9) 24
 (58)
Accounts payable to affiliates1
 (2) (1)2
 1
 (2)
Unbilled revenues(23) 20
 13
(33) (23) 20
Fuel, materials and supplies2
 6
 (32)45
 2
 6
Income tax receivable1
 135
 (136)
 1
 135
Taxes payable(7) 10
 (3)27
 (7) 10
Accrued interest
 9
 

 
 9
Other(6) 23
 (1)34
 (6) 23
Other operating activities 
  
  
 
  
  
Defined benefit plans - funding(85) (70) (45)(35) (85) (70)
Settlement of interest rate swaps(9) (88) 

 (9) (88)
Expenditures for asset retirement obligations(26) (7) (5)(34) (26) (7)
Other assets2
 (7) (7)8
 2
 (7)
Other liabilities4
 19
 11
8
 4
 19
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities1,027
 1,063
 999
Net cash provided by operating activities1,099
 1,027
 1,063
Cash Flows from Investing Activities 
  
  
 
  
  
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment(791) (1,210) (1,262)(892) (791) (1,210)
Net decrease in notes receivable from affiliates
 
 70
Other investing activities1
 7
 1
4
 1
 7
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities(790) (1,203) (1,191)
Net cash used in investing activities(888) (790) (1,203)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities 
  
  
 
  
  
Net increase in notes payable with affiliates109
 13
 41
62
 109
 13
Issuance of long-term note with affiliate
 400
 

 
 400
Issuance of long-term debt221
 1,050
 
160
 221
 1,050
Retirement of long-term debt(246) (900) 
(70) (246) (900)
Net increase (decrease) in short-term debt(80) (310) 330
Debt issuance and credit facility costs(3) (10) (5)
Distributions to member(316) (219) (436)(402) (316) (219)
Contributions from member61
 125
 248

 61
 125
Net increase (decrease) in short-term debt59
 (80) (310)
Other financing activities

(3) (3) (10)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities(254) 149
 178
(194) (254) 149
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents(17) 9
 (14)17
 (17) 9
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period30
 21
 35
13
 30
 21
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period$13
 $30
 $21
$30
 $13
 $30
          
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information          
Cash paid (received) during the period for:          
Interest - net of amount capitalized$198
 $163
 $157
$204
 $198
 $163
Income taxes - net$(24) $(139) $(75)$48
 $(24) $(139)
Significant non-cash transactions:          
Accrued expenditures for property, plant and equipment at December 31,$104
 $150
 $286
$174
 $104
 $150
 
 The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.


120


Table of Contents


CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT DECEMBER 31,
LG&E and KU Energy LLC and Subsidiaries
(Millions of Dollars)

2016 20152017 2016
Assets 
  
 
  
Current Assets 
  
 
  
Cash and cash equivalents$13
 $30
$30
 $13
Accounts receivable (less reserve: 2016, $24; 2015, $23) 
  
Accounts receivable (less reserve: 2017, $25; 2016, $24) 
  
Customer235
 209
246
 235
Other17
 17
44
 17
Unbilled revenues170
 147
203
 170
Fuel, materials and supplies297
 298
254
 297
Prepayments24
 23
25
 24
Regulatory assets20
 35
18
 20
Other current assets4
 6
8
 4
Total Current Assets780
 765
828
 780
      
Property, Plant and Equipment 
  
 
  
Regulated utility plant12,746
 11,906
13,187
 12,746
Less: accumulated depreciation - regulated utility plant1,465
 1,163
1,785
 1,465
Regulated utility plant, net11,281
 10,743
11,402
 11,281
Construction work in progress317
 660
627
 317
Property, Plant and Equipment, net11,598
 11,403
12,029
 11,598
      
Other Noncurrent Assets 
  
 
  
Regulatory assets824
 727
795
 824
Goodwill996
 996
996
 996
Other intangibles95
 123
86
 95
Other noncurrent assets78
 76
68
 78
Total Other Noncurrent Assets1,993
 1,922
1,945
 1,993
      
Total Assets$14,371
 $14,090
$14,802
 $14,371
 
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.



121


Table of Contents


CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT DECEMBER 31,
LG&E and KU Energy LLC and Subsidiaries
(Millions of Dollars)

2016 20152017 2016
Liabilities and Equity 
  
 
  
Current Liabilities 
  
 
  
Short-term debt$185
 $265
$244
 $185
Long-term debt due within one year194
 25
98
 194
Notes payable with affiliates163
 54
225
 163
Accounts payable251
 266
338
 251
Accounts payable to affiliates6
 5
7
 6
Customer deposits56
 52
58
 56
Taxes39
 46
66
 39
Price risk management liabilities4

5
4

4
Regulatory liabilities18
 32
9
 18
Interest32
 32
32
 32
Asset retirement obligations60
 50
85
 60
Other current liabilities119
 135
161
 119
Total Current Liabilities1,127
 967
1,327
 1,127
      
Long-term Debt 
  
 
  
Long-term debt4,471
 4,663
4,661
 4,471
Long-term debt to affiliate400
 400
400
 400
Total Long-term Debt4,871
 5,063
5,061
 4,871
      
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities 
  
 
  
Deferred income taxes1,735
 1,463
866
 1,735
Investment tax credits132
 128
129
 132
Price risk management liabilities27

42
22

27
Accrued pension obligations350
 296
365
 350
Asset retirement obligations373
 485
271
 373
Regulatory liabilities899
 923
2,036
 899
Other deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities190
 206
162
 190
Total Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities3,706
 3,543
3,851
 3,706
      
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Notes 6 and 15)

 

Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Notes 6 and 13)

 

      
Member's equity4,667
 4,517
4,563
 4,667
      
Total Liabilities and Equity$14,371
 $14,090
$14,802
 $14,371
 
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.



122


Table of Contents


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
LG&E and KU Energy LLC and Subsidiaries
(Millions of Dollars)

Member's
Equity
Member's
Equity
December 31, 2013$4,150
Net income344
Contributions from member248
Distributions to member(436)
Other comprehensive income (loss)(58)
December 31, 2014$4,248
$4,248
 
Net income$364
364
Contributions from member125
125
Distributions to member(219)(219)
Other comprehensive income (loss)(1)(1)
December 31, 2015$4,517
$4,517
 
 
Net income$429
$429
Contributions from member61
61
Distributions to member(316)(316)
Other comprehensive income (loss)(24)(24)
December 31, 2016$4,667
$4,667
 
Net income$316
Distributions to member(402)
Other comprehensive income (loss)(18)
December 31, 2017$4,563
 
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.


123


Table of Contents



























(THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY.)



124


Table of Contents



STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
Louisville Gas and Electric Company
(Millions of Dollars)

2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Operating Revenues 
  
   
  
  
Retail and wholesale$1,406
 $1,407
 $1,445
$1,422
 $1,406
 $1,407
Electric revenue from affiliate24
 37
 88
31
 24
 37
Total Operating Revenues1,430
 1,444
 1,533
1,453
 1,430
 1,444
          
Operating Expenses 
  
   
  
  
Operation 
  
   
  
  
Fuel301
 329
 404
292
 301
 329
Energy purchases153
 166
 230
160
 153
 166
Energy purchases from affiliate14
 20
 14
10
 14
 20
Other operation and maintenance355
 377
 379
355
 355
 377
Depreciation170
 162
 157
183
 170
 162
Taxes, other than income32
 28
 25
33
 32
 28
Total Operating Expenses1,025
 1,082
 1,209
1,033
 1,025
 1,082
          
Operating Income405
 362
 324
420
 405
 362
          
Other Income (Expense) - net(5) (6) (3)
Other Income (Expense) – net(5) (5) (6)
          
Interest Expense71
 57
 49
71
 71
 57
          
Income Before Income Taxes329
 299
 272
344
 329
 299
          
Income Taxes126
 114
 103
131
 126
 114
          
Net Income (a)$203
 $185
 $169
$213
 $203
 $185
 
(a)Net income equals comprehensive income.

The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.



125


Table of Contents


STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
Louisville Gas and Electric Company
(Millions of Dollars)
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Cash Flows from Operating Activities 
     
    
Net income$203
 $185
 $169
$213
 $203
 $185
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities          
Depreciation170
 162
 157
183
 170
 162
Amortization14
 11
 12
14
 14
 11
Defined benefit plans - expense8
 12
 9
7
 8
 12
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits147
 126
 118
126
 147
 126
Other
 8
 2
1
 
 8
Change in current assets and current liabilities          
Accounts receivable(22) 19
 (12)(7) (22) 19
Accounts receivable from affiliates(16) 11
 (23)4
 (16) 11
Accounts payable31
 (29) 25
(7) 31
 (29)
Accounts payable to affiliates1
 5
 (4)(4) 1
 5
Unbilled revenues(8) 9
 9
(16) (8) 9
Fuel, materials and supplies8
 3
 (8)12
 8
 3
Income tax receivable4
 70
 (74)
 4
 70
Taxes payable20
 1
 8
(15) 20
 1
Accrued interest
 5
 

 
 5
Other(7) 17
 
11
 (7) 17
Other operating activities          
Defined benefit plans - funding(46) (26) (13)(4) (46) (26)
Settlement of interest rate swaps(9) (44) 

 (9) (44)
Expenditures for asset retirement obligations(18) (6) (4)(15) (18) (6)
Other assets
 11
 (2)5
 
 11
Other liabilities2
 4
 2
4
 2
 4
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities482
 554
 371
Net cash provided by operating activities512
 482
 554
Cash Flows from Investing Activities          
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment(439) (689) (656)(458) (439) (689)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities(439) (689) (656)
Net cash used in investing activities(458) (439) (689)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities          
Issuance of long-term debt125
 550
 
160
 125
 550
Retirement of long-term debt(150) (250) 
(70) (150) (250)
Net increase (decrease) in short-term debt27
 (122) 244
Debt issuance and credit facility costs(2) (5) (2)
Payment of common stock dividends to parent(128) (119) (112)(192) (128) (119)
Contributions from parent71
 90
 157
30
 71
 90
Net increase (decrease) in short-term debt30
 27
 (122)
Other financing activities
(2) (2) (5)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities(57) 144
 287
(44) (57) 144
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents(14) 9
 2
10
 (14) 9
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period19
 10
 8
5
 19
 10
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period$5
 $19
 $10
$15
 $5
 $19
          
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information          
Cash paid (received) during the period for:          
Interest - net of amount capitalized$65
 $48
 $46
$65
 $65
 $48
Income taxes - net$(43) $(81) $65
$22
 $(43) $(81)
Significant non-cash transactions:          
Accrued expenditures for property, plant and equipment at December 31,$56
 $97
 $162
$92
 $56
 $97

The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.


126


Table of Contents


BALANCE SHEETS AT DECEMBER 31,
Louisville Gas and Electric Company
(Millions of Dollars, shares in thousands)

2016 20152017 2016
Assets 
  
 
  
Current Assets 
  
 
  
Cash and cash equivalents$5
 $19
$15
 $5
Accounts receivable (less reserve: 2016, $2; 2015, $1) 
  
Accounts receivable (less reserve: 2017, $1; 2016, $2) 
  
Customer109
 92
116
 109
Other11
 11
13
 11
Unbilled revenues75
 67
91
 75
Accounts receivable from affiliates28
 12
24
 28
Fuel, materials and supplies143
 151
131
 143
Prepayments12
 5
11
 12
Regulatory assets9
 16
12
 9
Other current assets1
 2
3
 1
Total Current Assets393
 375
416
 393
      
Property, Plant and Equipment 
  
 
  
Regulated utility plant5,357
 4,804
5,587
 5,357
Less: accumulated depreciation - regulated utility plant498
 404
614
 498
Regulated utility plant, net4,859
 4,400
4,973
 4,859
Construction work in progress133
 390
305
 133
Property, Plant and Equipment, net4,992
 4,790
5,278
 4,992
      
Other Noncurrent Assets 
  
 
  
Regulatory assets450
 424
411
 450
Goodwill389
 389
389
 389
Other intangibles59
 73
53
 59
Other noncurrent assets17
 17
12
 17
Total Other Noncurrent Assets915
 903
865
 915
      
Total Assets$6,300
 $6,068
$6,559
 $6,300
 
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.


127


Table of Contents


BALANCE SHEETS AT DECEMBER 31,
Louisville Gas and Electric Company
(Millions of Dollars, shares in thousands)

2016 20152017 2016
Liabilities and Equity 
  
 
  
Current Liabilities 
  
 
  
Short-term debt$169
 $142
$199
 $169
Long-term debt due within one year194
 25
98
 194
Accounts payable148
 157
179
 148
Accounts payable to affiliates26
 25
23
 26
Customer deposits27
 26
27
 27
Taxes40
 20
25
 40
Price risk management liabilities4
 5
4
 4
Regulatory liabilities5
 13
3
 5
Interest11
 11
11
 11
Asset retirement obligations41
 25
24
 41
Other current liabilities36
 39
52
 36
Total Current Liabilities701
 488
645
 701
      
Long-term Debt1,423
 1,617
1,611
 1,423
      
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities 
  
 
  
Deferred income taxes974
 829
572
 974
Investment tax credits36
 35
35
 36
Price risk management liabilities27
 42
22
 27
Accrued pension obligations53
 56
45
 53
Asset retirement obligations104
 149
97
 104
Regulatory liabilities419
 431
919
 419
Other deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities87
 91
86
 87
Total Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities1,700
 1,633
1,776
 1,700
      
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Notes 6 and 15)

 

Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Notes 6 and 13)

 

      
Stockholder's Equity 
  
 
  
Common stock - no par value (a)424
 424
424
 424
Additional paid-in capital1,682
 1,611
1,712
 1,682
Earnings reinvested370
 295
391
 370
Total Equity2,476
 2,330
2,527
 2,476
      
Total Liabilities and Equity$6,300
 $6,068
$6,559
 $6,300
 
(a)75,000 shares authorized; 21,294 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 20162017 and December 31, 2015.2016.

The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.



128


Table of Contents


STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
Louisville Gas and Electric Company
(Millions of Dollars)
Common
stock
shares
outstanding
(a)
 
Common
stock
 
Additional
paid-in
capital
 
Earnings
reinvested
 Total
Common
stock
shares
outstanding
(a)
 
Common
stock
 
Additional
paid-in
capital
 
Earnings
reinvested
 Total
December 31, 201321,294
 $424
 $1,364
 $172
 $1,960
Net income 
  
  
 169
 169
Capital contributions from LKE 
  
 157
  
 157
Cash dividends declared on common stock 
  
  
 (112) (112)
December 31, 201421,294
 $424
 $1,521
 $229
 $2,174
21,294
 $424
 $1,521
 $229
 $2,174
         
Net income      185
 185
 
  
  
 185
 185
Capital contributions from LKE 
  
 90
   90
 
  
 90
  
 90
Cash dividends declared on common stock 
  
  
 (119) (119) 
  
  
 (119) (119)
December 31, 201521,294
 $424
 $1,611
 $295
 $2,330
21,294
 $424
 $1,611
 $295
 $2,330
                  
Net income      203
 203
      203
 203
Capital contributions from LKE 
  
 71
   71
 
  
 71
   71
Cash dividends declared on common stock 
  
  
 (128) (128) 
  
  
 (128) (128)
December 31, 201621,294
 $424
 $1,682
 $370
 $2,476
21,294
 $424
 $1,682
 $370
 $2,476
         
Net income      213
 213
Capital contributions from LKE 
  
 30
   30
Cash dividends declared on common stock 
  
  
 (192) (192)
December 31, 201721,294
 $424
 $1,712
 $391
 $2,527
 
(a) Shares in thousands. All common shares of LG&E stock are owned by LKE.
 
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.



129


Table of Contents



























(THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY.)



130


Table of Contents



STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
Kentucky Utilities Company
(Millions of Dollars)

2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Operating Revenues 
     
    
Retail and wholesale$1,735
 $1,708
 $1,723
$1,734
 $1,735
 $1,708
Electric revenue from affiliate14
 20
 14
10
 14
 20
Total Operating Revenues1,749
 1,728
 1,737
1,744
 1,749
 1,728
          
Operating Expenses 
  
   
  
  
Operation 
  
   
  
  
Fuel490
 534
 561
467
 490
 534
Energy purchases18
 18
 23
18
 18
 18
Energy purchases from affiliate24
 37
 88
31
 24
 37
Other operation and maintenance424
 435
 408
424
 424
 435
Depreciation234
 220
 197
255
 234
 220
Taxes, other than income30
 29
 27
32
 30
 29
Total Operating Expenses1,220
 1,273
 1,304
1,227
 1,220
 1,273
          
Operating Income529
 455
 433
517
 529
 455
          
Other Income (Expense) - net(5) 1
 (1)
Other Income (Expense) – net(3) (5) 1
          
Interest Expense96
 82
 77
96
 96
 82
          
Income Before Income Taxes428
 374
 355
418
 428
 374
          
Income Taxes163
 140
 135
159
 163
 140
          
Net Income (a)$265
 $234
 $220
$259
 $265
 $234
 
(a)Net income approximates comprehensive income.

The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.



131


Table of Contents


STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
Kentucky Utilities Company
(Millions of DollarsDollars)
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Cash Flows from Operating Activities 
     
    
Net income$265
 $234
 $220
$259
 $265
 $234
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 
  
  
 
  
  
Depreciation234
 220
 197
255
 234
 220
Amortization14
 13
 11
9
 14
 13
Defined benefit plans - expense5
 10
 5
4
 5
 10
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits126
 160
 224
152
 126
 160
Other(1) (5) 13

 (1) (5)
Change in current assets and current liabilities 
  
  
 
  
  
Accounts receivable(8) 5
 (9)(5) (8) 5
Accounts receivable from affiliates1
 (1) 

 1
 (1)
Accounts payable(10) (32) (10)
 (10) (32)
Accounts payable to affiliates15
 (10) 22
(6) 15
 (10)
Unbilled revenues(15) 11
 4
(17) (15) 11
Fuel, materials and supplies(6) 3
 (25)32
 (6) 3
Income tax receivable
 59
 (60)
 
 59
Taxes payable25
 6
 (19)(26) 25
 6
Accrued interest
 5
 

 
 5
Other(3) 4
 (5)7
 (3) 4
Other operating activities 
  
  
 
  
  
Defined benefit plans - funding(20) (21) (5)(23) (20) (21)
Settlement of interest rate swaps
 (44) 

 
 (44)
Expenditures for asset retirement obligations(8) (1) (1)(19) (8) (1)
Other assets(6) (11) (4)3
 (6) (11)
Other liabilities(2) 3
 8
9
 (2) 3
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities606
 608
 566
Net cash provided by operating activities634
 606
 608
Cash Flows from Investing Activities 
  
  
 
  
  
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment(350) (519) (604)(432) (350) (519)
Other investing activities1
 7
 1
4
 1
 7
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities(349) (512) (603)
Net cash used in investing activities(428) (349) (512)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities 
  
  
 
  
  
Issuance of long-term debt96
 500
 

 96
 500
Retirement of long-term debt(96) (250) 

 (96) (250)
Net increase (decrease) in short-term debt(32) (188) 86
Debt issuance and credit facility costs(1) (5) (2)
Payment of common stock dividends to parent(248) (153) (148)(226) (248) (153)
Contributions from parent20
 
 91

 20
 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities(261) (96) 27
Net increase (decrease) in short-term debt29
 (32) (188)
Other financing activities
(1) (1) (5)
Net cash used in financing activities(198) (261) (96)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents(4) 
 (10)8
 (4) 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period11
 11
 21
7
 11
 11
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period$7
 $11
 $11
$15
 $7
 $11
          
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information          
Cash paid (received) during the period for:          
Interest - net of amount capitalized$89
 $75
 $73
$92
 $89
 $75
Income taxes - net$13
 $(84) $
$34
 $13
 $(84)
Significant non-cash transactions:          
Accrued expenditures for property, plant and equipment at December 31,$47
 $53
 $124
$82
 $47
 $53
  
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.


132


Table of Contents


BALANCE SHEETS AT DECEMBER 31,
Kentucky Utilities Company
(Millions of Dollars, shares in thousands)

2016 20152017 2016
Assets 
  
 
  
Current Assets 
  
 
  
Cash and cash equivalents$7
 $11
$15
 $7
Accounts receivable (less reserve: 2016, $2; 2015, $2) 
  
Accounts receivable (less reserve: 2017, $1; 2016, $2) 
  
Customer126
 117
130
 126
Other5
 9
30
 5
Unbilled revenues95
 80
112
 95
Accounts receivable from affiliates
 1
Fuel, materials and supplies154
 147
123
 154
Prepayments12
 8
14
 12
Regulatory assets11
 19
6
 11
Other current assets3
 4
5
 3
Total Current Assets413
 396
435
 413
      
Property, Plant and Equipment 
  
 
  
Regulated utility plant7,382
 7,099
7,592
 7,382
Less: accumulated depreciation - regulated utility plant965
 759
1,170
 965
Regulated utility plant, net6,417
 6,340
6,422
 6,417
Construction work in progress181
 267
321
 181
Property, Plant and Equipment, net6,598
 6,607
6,743
 6,598
      
Other Noncurrent Assets 
  
 
  
Regulatory assets374
 303
384
 374
Goodwill607
 607
607
 607
Other intangibles36
 50
33
 36
Other noncurrent assets57
 48
52
 57
Total Other Noncurrent Assets1,074
 1,008
1,076
 1,074
      
Total Assets$8,085
 $8,011
$8,254
 $8,085
 
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.



133


Table of Contents



BALANCE SHEETS AT DECEMBER 31,
Kentucky Utilities Company
(Millions of Dollars, shares in thousands)

2016 20152017 2016
Liabilities and Equity 
  
 
  
Current Liabilities 
  
 
  
Short-term debt$16
 $48
$45
 $16
Accounts payable78
 88
137
 78
Accounts payable to affiliates56
 39
53
 56
Customer deposits29
 26
31
 29
Taxes45
 20
19
 45
Regulatory liabilities13
 19
6
 13
Interest16
 16
16
 16
Asset retirement obligations19
 25
61
 19
Other current liabilities36
 44
46
 36
Total Current Liabilities308
 325
414
 308
      
Long-term Debt2,327
 2,326
2,328
 2,327
      
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities 
  
 
  
Deferred income taxes1,170
 1,046
691
 1,170
Investment tax credits96
 93
94
 96
Accrued pension obligations62
 46
36
 62
Asset retirement obligations269
 336
174
 269
Regulatory liabilities480
 492
1,117
 480
Other deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities50
 60
43
 50
Total Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities2,127
 2,073
2,155
 2,127
      
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Notes 6 and 15)

 

Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Notes 6 and 13)

 

      
Stockholder's Equity 
  
 
  
Common stock - no par value (a)308
 308
308
 308
Additional paid-in capital2,616
 2,596
2,616
 2,616
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(1) 

 (1)
Earnings reinvested400
 383
433
 400
Total Equity3,323
 3,287
3,357
 3,323
      
Total Liabilities and Equity$8,085
 $8,011
$8,254
 $8,085
 
(a)80,000 shares authorized; 37,818 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 20162017 and December 31, 2015.2016.
 
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.



134


Table of Contents


STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
Kentucky Utilities Company
(Millions of Dollars)

Common
stock
shares
outstanding
(a)
 
Common
stock
 
Additional
paid-in
capital
 
Earnings
reinvested
 
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
income
(loss)
 Total
Common
stock
shares
outstanding
(a)
 
Common
stock
 
Additional
paid-in
capital
 
Earnings
reinvested
 
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
income
(loss)
 Total
December 31, 201337,818
 $308
 $2,505
 $230
 $1
 $3,044
Net income 
  
  
 220
  
 220
Capital contributions from LKE 
  
 91
  
  
 91
Cash dividends declared on common stock 
  
  
 (148)  
 (148)
Other comprehensive income (loss)        (1) (1)
December 31, 201437,818
 $308
 $2,596
 $302
 $
 $3,206
37,818
 $308
 $2,596
 $302
 $
 $3,206
           
Net income      234
   234
 
  
  
 234
  
 234
Cash dividends declared on common stock 
  
  
 (153)  
 (153) 
  
  
 (153)  
 (153)
December 31, 201537,818
 $308
 $2,596
 $383
 $
 $3,287
37,818
 $308
 $2,596
 $383
 $
 $3,287
                      
Net income      265
   265
      265
   265
Capital contributions from LKE    20
     20
 
  
 20
  
  
 20
Cash dividends declared on common stock 
  
  
 (248)  
 (248) 
  
  
 (248)  
 (248)
Other comprehensive income (loss)        (1) (1) 
  
  
  
 (1) (1)
December 31, 201637,818
 $308
 $2,616
 $400
 $(1) $3,323
37,818
 $308
 $2,616
 $400
 $(1) $3,323
           
Net income      259
   259
Cash dividends declared on common stock 
  
  
 (226)  
 (226)
Other comprehensive income (loss)        1
 1
December 31, 201737,818
 $308
 $2,616
 $433
 $
 $3,357
 
(a) Shares in thousands. All common shares of KU stock are owned by LKE.
(a)Shares in thousands. All common shares of KU stock are owned by LKE.
 
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.



 


135


Table of Contents


COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
(All Registrants)
 
General
 
Capitalized terms and abbreviations appearing in the combined notes to financial statements are defined in the glossary. Dollars are in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise noted. The specific Registrant to which disclosures are applicable is identified in parenthetical headings in italics above the applicable disclosure or within the applicable disclosure for each Registrants' related activities and disclosures. Within combined disclosures, amounts are disclosed for any Registrant when significant.
 
Business and Consolidation
 
(PPL)
 
PPL is a utility holding company that, through its regulated subsidiaries, is primarily engaged in: 1) the distribution of electricity in the U.K.; 2) the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity and the distribution and sale of natural gas, primarily in Kentucky; and 3) the transmission, distribution and sale of electricity in Pennsylvania. Headquartered in Allentown, PA, PPL's principal subsidiaries are PPL Global, LKE (including its principal subsidiaries, LG&E and KU) and PPL Electric. PPL's corporate level financing subsidiary is PPL Capital Funding.
 
WPD, a subsidiary of PPL Global, through indirect, wholly owned subsidiaries, operates distribution networks providing electricity service in the U.K. WPD serves end-users in South Wales and southwest and central England. Its principal subsidiaries are WPD (South Wales), WPD (South West), WPD (East Midlands) and WPD (West Midlands).
 
PPL consolidates WPD on a one-month lag. Material events, such as debt issuances that occur in the lag period, are recognized in the current period financial statements. Events that are significant but not material are disclosed.
 
(PPL and PPL Electric)
 
PPL Electric is a cost-based rate-regulated utility subsidiary of PPL. PPL Electric's principal business is the transmission and distribution of electricity to serve retail customers in its franchised territory in eastern and central Pennsylvania and the regulated supply of electricity to retail customers in that territory as a PLR.
 
(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
 
LKE is a utility holding company with cost-based rate-regulated utility operations through its subsidiaries, LG&E and KU. LG&E and KU are engaged in the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity. LG&E also engages in the distribution and sale of natural gas. LG&E and KU maintain their separate identities and serve customers in Kentucky under their respective names. KU also serves customers in Virginia (underunder the Old Dominion Power name)name and in Tennessee under the KU name.
 
(PPL)
 
"Income (Loss)Loss from Discontinued Operations (net of income taxes)" on the Statements2015 Statement of Income for the years 2015 and 2014 includes the activities of PPL Energy Supply, substantially representing PPL's former Supply segment, which was spun off and distributed to PPL shareowners on June 1, 2015. In addition, the StatementsStatement of Cash Flows for the same periodsperiod separately reportreports the cash flows of the discontinued operations. See Note 8 for additional information.
 
(All Registrants)
 
The financial statements of the Registrants include each company's own accounts as well as the accounts of all entities in which the company has a controlling financial interest. Entities for which a controlling financial interest is not demonstrated through voting interests are evaluated based on accounting guidance for Variable Interest Entities (VIEs). The Registrants consolidate a VIE when they are determined to have a controlling interest in the VIE, and thusas a result are the primary beneficiary of the entity. The Registrants are not the primary beneficiary in any VIEs. Investments in entities in which a company has the ability to exercise


136


Table of Contents


exercise significant influence but does not have a controlling financial interest are accounted for under the equity method. All other investments are carried at cost or fair value. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
 
The financial statements of PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU include their share of any undivided interests in jointly owned facilities, as well as their share of the related operating costs of those facilities. See Note 12 for additional information.
 
Regulation
 
(PPL)
 
WPD operates in an incentive-based regulatory structure under distribution licenses granted by Ofgem. Electricity distribution revenues are set by Ofgem for a given time period through price control reviews that are not directly based on cost recovery. The price control formula that governs WPD's allowed revenue is designed to provide economic incentives to minimize operating, capital and financing costs. As a result, WPD is not subject to accounting for the effects of certain types of regulation as prescribed by GAAP and does not record regulatory assets and liabilities.
 
(All Registrants)PPL Electric, LG&E and KU)
 
PPL Electric, LG&E and KU are cost-based rate-regulated utilities for which rates are set by regulators to enable PPL Electric, LG&E and KU to recover the costs of providing electric or gas service, as applicable, and to provide a reasonable return to shareholders. Base rates are generally established based on a future test period. As a result, the financial statements are subject to the accounting for certain types of regulation as prescribed by GAAP and reflect the effects of regulatory actions. Regulatory assets are recognized for the effect of transactions or events where future recovery of underlying costs is probable in regulated customer rates. The effect of such accounting is to defer certain or qualifying costs that would otherwise currently be charged to expense. Regulatory liabilities are recognized for amounts expected to be returned through future regulated customer rates. In certain cases, regulatory liabilities are recorded based on an understanding or agreement with the regulator that rates have been set to recover costs that are expected to be incurred in the future, and the regulated entity is accountable for any amounts charged pursuant to such rates and not yet expended for the intended purpose. The accounting for regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities is based on specific ratemaking decisions or precedent for each transaction or event as prescribed by the FERC or the applicable state regulatory commissions. See Note 6 for additional details regarding regulatory matters.
 
(All Registrants)

Accounting Records
 
The system of accounts for domestic regulated entities is maintained in accordance with the Uniform System of Accounts prescribed by the FERC and adopted by the applicable state regulatory commissions.
 
(All Registrants)

Use of Estimates
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
Loss Accruals
 
Potential losses are accrued when (1) information is available that indicates it is "probable" that a loss has been incurred, given the likelihood of the uncertain future events and (2) the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Accounting guidance defines "probable" as cases in which "the future event or events are likely to occur." The Registrants continuously assess potential loss contingencies for environmental remediation, litigation claims, regulatory penalties and other events. Loss accruals for environmental remediation are discounted when appropriate.
 
The accrual of contingencies that might result in gains is not recorded, unless realization is assured.

Changes in Classification
The classification of certain amounts in the 2015 and 2014 financial statements have been changed to conform to the current presentation. These reclassifications did not affect the Registrants' net income or equity.

Table of Contents

Earnings Per Share (PPL)
 
EPS is computed using the two-class method, which is an earnings allocation method for computing EPS that treats a participating security as having rights to earnings that would otherwise have been available to common shareowners. Share-basedShare-


137


Table of Contents


based payment awards that provide recipients a non-forfeitable right to dividends or dividend equivalents are considered participating securities.
 
Price Risk Management
 
(All Registrants)
 
Interest rate contracts are used to hedge exposure to changechanges in the fair value of debt instruments and to hedge exposuresexposure to variability in expected cash flows associated with existing floating-rate debt instruments or forecasted fixed-rate issuances of debt. Foreign currency exchange contracts are used to hedge foreign currency exposures, primarily associated with PPL's investments in U.K. subsidiaries. Similar derivatives may receive different accounting treatment, depending on management's intended use and documentation.
 
Certain contracts may not meet the definition of a derivative because they lack a notional amount or a net settlement provision. In cases where there is no net settlement provision, markets are periodically assessed to determine whether market mechanisms have evolved that would facilitate net settlement. Certain derivative contracts may be excluded from the requirements of derivative accounting treatment because NPNS has been elected. These contracts are accounted for using accrual accounting. Contracts that have been classified as derivative contracts are reflected on the balance sheets at fair value. The portion of derivative positions that deliver within a year are included in "Current Assets" and "Current Liabilities," while the portion of derivative positions that deliver beyond a year are recorded in "Other Noncurrent Assets" and "Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities." See Note 17 for additional information.

Cash inflows and outflows related to derivative instruments are included as a component of operating, investing or financing activities on the Statements of Cash Flows, depending on the classification of the hedged items.

PPL and its subsidiaries have elected not to offset net derivative positions against the right to reclaim cash collateral (a receivable) or the obligation to return cash collateral (a payable) under master netting arrangements.
 
(PPL)
 
Processes exist that allow for subsequent review and validation of the contract information as it relates to interest rate and foreign currency derivatives. See Note 17 for additional information. The accounting department provides the treasury department with guidelines on appropriate accounting classifications for various contract types and strategies. Examples of accounting guidelines provided to the treasury department staff include, but are not limited to:
 
Transactions to lock in an interest rate prior to a debt issuance can be designated as cash flow hedges, to the extent the forecasted debt issuances remain probable of occurring.

Cross-currency transactions to hedge interest and principal repayments can be designated as cash flow hedges.

Transactions entered into to hedge fluctuations in the fair value of existing debt can be designated as fair value hedges.

Transactions entered into to hedge the value of a net investment of foreign operations can be designated as net investment hedges.

Derivative transactions that do not qualify for cash flow or net investment hedge treatment are marked to fair value through earnings. These transactions generally include foreign currency forwards and options to hedge GBPGBP-denominated earnings translation risk associated with PPL's U.K. subsidiaries that report their financial statements in GBP. As such, these transactions reduce earnings volatility due solely to changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

(All Registrants)

Derivative transactions may be marked to fair value through regulatory assets/liabilities at PPL Electric, LG&E and KU if approved by the appropriate regulatory body. These transactions generally include the effect of interest rate swaps that are included in customer rates.


Table of Contents

(PPL and PPL Electric)
 
To meet its obligation as a PLR to its customers, PPL Electric has entered into certain contracts that meet the definition of a derivative. However, NPNS has been elected for these contracts.


138


Table of Contents


 
See Notes 16 and 17 for additional information on derivatives.
 
Revenue
 
(PPL)

Operating Revenues
 
For the years ended December 31, the Statements of Income "Operating Revenues" line item contains revenue from the following: 
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Domestic electric and gas revenues (a)$5,297
 $5,239
 $5,209
$5,351
 $5,297
 $5,239
U.K. operating revenues (b)2,207
 2,410
 2,621
2,091
 2,207
 2,410
Domestic - other13
 20
 22
5
 13
 20
Total$7,517
 $7,669
 $7,852
$7,447
 $7,517
 $7,669
 
(a)Represents revenues from cost-based rate-regulated generation, transmission and/or distribution in Pennsylvania, Kentucky, Virginia and Tennessee, including regulated wholesale revenue.
(b)Primarily represents regulated electricity distribution revenues from the operation of WPD's distribution networks.

Revenue Recognition
 
(All Registrants)
 
Operating revenues are primarily recorded based on energy deliveries through the end of the calendar month. Unbilled retail revenues result because customers' bills are rendered throughout the month, rather than bills being rendered at the end of the month. For LKE, LG&E and KU, unbilled revenues for a month are calculated by multiplying an estimate of unbilled kWh by the estimated average cents per kWh. Any difference between estimated and actual revenues is adjusted the following month.month when the previous unbilled estimate is reversed and actual billings occur. For PPL Electric, unbilled revenues for a month are calculated by multiplying the actual unbilled kWh by an average rate per customer class.
 
(PPL)
 
WPD is currently operating under the eight-year price control period of RIIO-ED1, which commenced for electric distribution companies on April 1, 2015. Ofgem has adopted a price control mechanism that establishes the amount of base demand revenue WPD can earn, subject to certain true-ups, and provides for an increase or reduction in revenues based on incentives or penalties for performance relative to pre-established targets. WPD's allowed revenue primarily includes base demand revenue (adjusted for inflation using RPI), performance incentive revenues/penalties and adjustments for over or under-recovery from prior periods and adjustments related to the DPCR4 line loss close out.periods.
 
As the regulatory model is incentive based rather than a cost recovery model, WPD is not subject to accounting for the effects of certain types of regulation as prescribed by GAAP. Therefore, the accounting treatment of adjustments to base demand revenue and/or allowed revenue is evaluated primarily based on revenue recognition and contingency accounting guidance.
 
Unlike prior price control reviews, base demand revenue under RIIO-ED1 will beis adjusted during the price control period. The most significant of those adjustments are:
 
Inflation True-Up - The base demand revenue for the RIIO-ED1 period was set inbased on 2012/13 prices. Therefore an inflation factor as determined by forecasted RPI, provided by HM Treasury, is applied to base demand revenue.
Forecasted RPI is trued up to actuals and affects future base demand revenue two regulatory years later. This revenue change is called the "TRU" adjustment.


Table of Contents

Annual Iteration Process (AIP) - The RIIO-ED1 price control period also includes an Annual Iteration Process (AIP).AIP. This will allow future base demand revenues agreed with the regulator as part of the price control review, to be updated during the price control period for financial adjustments including tax, pensions, and cost of debt, legacy price control adjustments from preceding price control periods and adjustments relating to actual and allowed total expenditure together with the Totex Incentive Mechanism (TIM). Under the TIM, WPD's DNOs are able to retain 70% of any amounts not spent against the RIIO-ED1


139


Table of Contents


plan and bear 70% of any over-spends. The AIP calculates an incremental change to base demand revenue, known as the "MOD" adjustment.

As both MOD and TRU are changes to future base demand revenues as determined by Ofgem, under applicable GAAP, these adjustments are recognized as a component of revenues in future years in which service is provided and revenues are collected or returned to customers.
 
In addition to base demand revenue, certain other items are added or subtracted to arrive at allowed revenue. The most significant of these are:
 
Incentives - Ofgem has established incentives to provide opportunities for DNO's to enhance overall returns by improving network efficiency, reliability and customer service. BasedThese incentives can result in an increase or reduction in revenues based on applicable GAAP, incentiveincentives or penalties for actual performance against pre-established targets based on past performance. The annual incentives and penalties are reflected in customers' rates on a two-year lag from the time they are earned and/or assessed. Incentive revenues are not recorded as assets and penalties are included in revenues when they are billed to customers.

DPCR4 Line Loss Adjustment - For regulatory years 2015/16 through 2018/19 allowed revenue will also be reduced to reflect Ofgem's final decision on the DPCR4 line loss incentives and penalties mechanism. WPD has a liability recorded related to this future revenue reduction and, therefore, this will not impact future earnings. See Note 6 for additional information.

Correction Factor - During the current price control period, WPD sets its tariffs to recover allowed revenue. However, in any fiscal period, WPD's revenue could be negatively affected if its tariffs and the volume delivered do not fully recover the revenue allowed for a particular period. Conversely, WPD could also over-recover revenue. Over and under-recoveries are subtracted from or added to allowed revenue in future years when they are billed to customers, known as the "Correction Factor" or "K-factor." Over and under-recovered amounts arising for the periods beginning with the 2014/15 regulatory year and refunded/recovered under RIIO-ED1 will be refunded/recovered on a two year lag (previously one year). Therefore the 2014/15 over/under-recovery adjustment will occuroccurred in the 2016/17 regulatory year.
Under applicable GAAP, WPD does not record a receivable for under-recoveries, but does record a liability for over-recoveries. K-factor is measured as of the end of the regulatory year, March 31. While WPD estimates over-recoveries and records a liability when it is probable that there will be an over-recovered position at the end of the regulatory-year, weather-related volume changes and other factors such as sales mix can affect the over or under-recovery between the end of PPL's calendar year and the end of the regulatory year.

Accounts Receivable
 
(All Registrants)
 
Accounts receivable are reported on the Balance Sheets at the gross outstanding amount adjusted for an allowance for doubtful accounts.
 
(PPL and PPL Electric)
In accordance with a PUC-approved purchase of accounts receivable program, PPL Electric purchases certain accounts receivable from alternative electricity suppliers at a discount, which reflects a provision for uncollectible accounts. The alternative electricity suppliers have no continuing involvement or interest in the purchased accounts receivable. Accounts receivable that are acquired are initially recorded at fair value on the date of acquisition. During 2016, 2015 and 2014, PPL Electric purchased $1.4 billion, $1.3 billion and $1.1 billion of accounts receivable from unaffiliated third parties. During 2015 and 2014, PPL Electric purchased $146 million and $336 million of accounts receivable from PPL EnergyPlus. PPL Electric's purchases from PPL EnergyPlus for 2015 include purchases through May 31, 2015, which is the period during which PPL Electric and PPL EnergyPlus were affiliated entities. As a result of the June 1, 2015 spinoff of PPL Energy Supply and creation of Talen Energy, PPL EnergyPlus (renamed Talen Energy Marketing) is no longer an affiliate of PPL Electric. PPL Electric's purchases from Talen Energy Marketing subsequent to May 31, 2015 are included as purchases from unaffiliated third parties.

Table of Contents

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

(All Registrants)

Accounts receivable collectability is evaluated using a combination of factors, including past due status based on contractual terms, trends in write-offs and the age of the receivable. Specific events, such as bankruptcies, are also considered when applicable. Adjustments to the allowance for doubtful accounts are made when necessary based on the results of analysis, the aging of receivables and historical and industry trends.
 
Accounts receivable are written off in the period in which the receivable is deemed uncollectible.
 
The changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts were: 
  Additions      Additions    
Balance at
Beginning of Period
 Charged to Income 
Charged to
Other Accounts
 Deductions (a) 
Balance at
End of Period
Balance at
Beginning of Period
 Charged to Income 
Charged to
Other Accounts
 Deductions (a) 
Balance at
End of Period
PPL                  
2017$54
 $28
 $(1) $30
 $51
2016$41
 $44
 $
 $31
 $54
41
 44
 
 31
 54
201544
 49
 (2) 50
 41
44
 49
 (2) 50
 41
201443
 49
 
 48
 44
                  
PPL Electric                  
2017$28
 $18
 $
 $22
 $24
2016$16
 $35
 $
 $23
 $28
16
 35
 
 23
 28
201517
 39
 
 40
 16
17
 39
 
 40
 16
201418
 34
 
 35
 17
         
LKE         
2016$23
 $8
 $
 $7
 $24
201525
 9
 (2) 9
 23
201422
 14
 
 11
 25
         
LG&E         
2016$1
 $2
 $1
 $2
 $2
20152
 2
 
 3
 1
20142
 5
 (1) 4
 2
         
KU         
2016$2
 $4
 $
 $4
 $2
20152
 5
 
 5
 2
20144
 8
 (3) 7
 2


140


Table of Contents


   Additions    
 
Balance at
Beginning of Period
 Charged to Income 
Charged to
Other Accounts
 Deductions (a) 
Balance at
End of Period
          
LKE         
2017$24
 $8
 $(1) $6
 $25
201623
 8
 
 7
 24
201525
 9
 (2) 9
 23
          
LG&E         
2017$2
 $2
 $(1) $2
 $1
20161
 2
 1
 2
 2
20152
 2
 
 3
 1
          
KU         
2017$2
 $4
 $(1) $4
 $1
20162
 4
 
 4
 2
20152
 5
 
 5
 2
 
(a)Primarily related to uncollectible accounts written off.

Cash

(All Registrants)

Cash Equivalents
 
All highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents.

(PPL and PPL Electric)
 
Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
Bank deposits and other cash equivalents that are restricted by agreement or that have been clearly designated for a specific purpose are classified as restricted cash and cash equivalents. The change in restricted cash and cash equivalents is reported as an investing activity on the Statements of Cash Flows. On the Balance Sheets, the current portion of restricted cash and cash equivalents is included in "Other current assets," while the noncurrent portion is included in "Other noncurrent assets."

Table of Contents


At December 31, the balances of restricted cash and cash equivalents included the following: 
PPL PPL ElectricPPL PPL Electric
2016 2015 2016 20152017 2016 2017 2016
Low carbon network fund (a)$17
 $22
 $
 $
$17
 $17
 $
 $
Other9
 11
 2
 2
9
 9
 2
 2
Total$26
 $33
 $2
 $2
$26
 $26
 $2
 $2
 
(a)Funds received by WPD, which are to be spent on approved initiatives to support a low carbon environment.

(All Registrants)

Fair Value Measurements
 
The Registrants value certain financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities at fair value. Generally, the most significant fair value measurements relate to price risk management assets and liabilities, investments in securities in defined benefit plans, and cash and cash equivalents. PPL and its subsidiaries use, as appropriate, a market approach (generally, data from market transactions), an income approach (generally, present value techniques and option-pricing models) and/or a cost approach (generally, replacement cost) to measure the fair value of an asset or liability. These valuation approaches incorporate inputs such as observable, independent market data and/or unobservable data that management believes are predicated on the


141


Table of Contents


assumptions market participants would use to price an asset or liability. These inputs may incorporate, as applicable, certain risks such as nonperformance risk, which includes credit risk.
 
The Registrants classify fair value measurements within one of three levels in the fair value hierarchy. The level assigned to a fair value measurement is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
 
Level 1 - quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that are accessible at the measurement date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

Level 2 - inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

Level 3 - unobservable inputs that management believes are predicated on the assumptions market participants would use to measure the asset or liability at fair value.

Assessing the significance of a particular input requires judgment that considers factors specific to the asset or liability. As such, the Registrants' assessment of the significance of a particular input may affect how the assets and liabilities are classified within the fair value hierarchy.
 
Investments
 
(All Registrants)
 
Generally, the original maturity date of an investment and management's intent and ability to sell an investment prior to its original maturity determine the classification of investments as either short-term or long-term. Investments that would otherwise be classified as short-term, but are restricted as to withdrawal or use for other than current operations or are clearly designated for expenditure in the acquisition or construction of noncurrent assets or for the liquidation of long-term debts, are classified as long-term.
 
Short-term Investments
 
Short-term investments generally include certain deposits as well as securities that are considered highly liquid or provide for periodic reset of interest rates. Investments with original maturities greater than three months and less than a year, as well as investments with original maturities of greater than a year that management has the ability and intent to sell within a year, are included in "Other current assets" on the Balance Sheets.


Table of Contents

(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)

Cost Method Investment
 
LG&E and KU each have an investment in OVEC, which is accounted for using the cost method. The investment is recorded in "Other noncurrent assets" on the PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU Balance Sheets. LG&E and KU and ten other electric utilities are equity owners of OVEC. OVEC's power is currently supplied to LG&E and KU and 11 other companies affiliated with the various owners. LG&E and KU own 5.63% and 2.5% of OVEC's common stock. Pursuant to a power purchase agreement, LG&E and KU are contractually entitled to their ownership percentage of OVEC's output, which is approximately 120 MW for LG&E and approximately 53 MW for KU.
 
LG&E's and KU's combined investment in OVEC is not significant. The direct exposure to loss as a result of LG&E's and KU's involvement with OVEC is generally limited to the value of their investments; however, LG&E and KU are conditionally responsible for a pro-rata share of certain OVEC obligations, pursuant to their power purchase contract with OVEC. As part of PPL's acquisition of LKE, the value of the power purchase contract was recorded as an intangible asset with an offsetting regulatory liability, both of which are being amortized using the units-of-production method until March 2026. See Notes 6, 13 and 18 for additional discussion of the power purchase agreement.
 


142


Table of Contents


Long-Lived and Intangible Assets
 
Property, Plant and Equipment
 
(All Registrants)
 
PP&E is recorded at original cost, unless impaired. PP&E acquired in business combinations is recorded at fair value at the time of acquisition. If impaired, the asset is written down to fair value at that time, which becomes the new cost basis of the asset. Original cost for constructed assets includes material, labor, contractor costs, certain overheads and financing costs, where applicable. The cost of repairs and minor replacements are charged to expense as incurred. The Registrants record costs associated with planned major maintenance projects in the period in which the costs are incurred. No costs associated with planned major maintenance projects are accrued to PP&E in advance of the period in which the work is performed. LG&E and KU accrue costs of removal net of estimated salvage value through depreciation, which is included in the calculation of customer rates over the assets' depreciable lives in accordance with regulatory practices. Cost of removal amounts accrued through depreciation rates are accumulated as a regulatory liability until the removal costs are incurred. For LKE, LG&E and KU, all ARO depreciation expenses are reclassified to a regulatory asset. See "Asset Retirement Obligations" below and Note 6 for additional information. PPL Electric records net costs of removal when incurred as a regulatory asset. The regulatory asset is subsequently amortized through depreciation over a five-year period, which is recoverable in customer rates in accordance with regulatory practices.
 
AFUDC is capitalized at PPL Electric as part of the construction costs for cost-based rate-regulated projects for which a return on such costs is recovered after the project is placed in service. The debt component of AFUDC is credited to "Interest Expense" and the equity component is credited to "Other Income (Expense) - net" on the Statements of Income. LG&E and KU generally do not record AFUDC, except for certain instances in KU's FERC approved rates charged to its municipal customers, as a return is provided on construction work in progress.
 
(PPL)
 
PPL capitalizes interest costs as part of construction costs. Capitalized interest, including the debt component of AFUDC for PPL, was as follows:
 PPL
2016$11
201511
201416

Table of Contents

$11 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015.
 
Depreciation
 
(All Registrants)
 
Depreciation is recorded over the estimated useful lives of property using various methods including the straight-line, composite and group methods. When a component of PP&E that was depreciated under the composite or group method is retired, the original cost is charged to accumulated depreciation. When all or a significant portion of an operating unit that
was depreciated under the composite or group method is retired or sold, the property and the related accumulated depreciation account is reduced and any gain or loss is included in income, unless otherwise required by regulators.
 
Following are the weighted-average annual rates of depreciation, for regulated utility plant, for the years ended December 31:
 2016 2015 2014
PPL2.73% 2.57% 2.92%
PPL Electric2.63% 2.46% 2.46%
LKE3.69% 3.69% 3.80%
LG&E3.58% 3.65% 4.05%
KU3.77% 3.71% 3.63%
(PPL)
Effective January 1, 2015, after completing a review of the useful lives of its distribution network assets, WPD extended the weighted average useful lives of these assets to 69 years from 55 years for GAAP reporting of depreciation expense. For 2015, this change in useful lives resulted in lower depreciation expense compared with 2014 of $84 million ($66 million after-tax or $0.10 per share).
 2017 2016 2015
PPL2.65% 2.73% 2.57%
PPL Electric2.86% 2.63% 2.46%
LKE3.64% 3.69% 3.69%
LG&E3.63% 3.58% 3.65%
KU3.66% 3.77% 3.71%
 
(All Registrants)
 
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
 
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price paid over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired in a business combination.
 
Other acquired intangible assets are initially measured based on their fair value. Intangibles that have finite useful lives are amortized over their useful lives based upon the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible assets are consumed


143


Table of Contents


or otherwise used. Costs incurred to obtain an initial license and renew or extend terms of licenses are capitalized as intangible assets.
 
When determining the useful life of an intangible asset, including intangible assets that are renewed or extended, PPL and its subsidiaries consider consider:

the expected use of the asset;
the expected useful life of other assets to which the useful life of the intangible asset may relate;
legal, regulatory, or contractual provisions that may limit the useful life;
the company's historical experience as evidence of its ability to support renewal or extension;
the effects of obsolescence, demand, competition, and other economic factors; and,
the level of maintenance expenditures required to obtain the expected future cash flows from the asset.
 
 Asset Impairment (Excluding Investments)
 
The Registrants review long-lived assets that are subject to depreciation or amortization, including finite-lived intangibles, for impairment when events or circumstances indicate carrying amounts may not be recoverable.
 
A long-lived asset classified as held and used is impaired when the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. If impaired, the asset's carrying value is written down to its fair value.

A long-lived asset classified as held for sale is impaired when the carrying amount of the asset (disposal group) exceeds its fair value less cost to sell. If impaired, the asset's (disposal group's) carrying value is written down to its fair value less cost to sell.
 

Table of Contents

PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU review goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level annually or more frequently when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a reporting unit may be greater than the unit's fair value. Additionally, goodwill must be tested for impairment in circumstances when a portion of goodwill has been allocated to a business to be disposed. PPL's, LKE's, LG&E's and KU's reporting units are at the operating segment level.
 
PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU may elect either to initially make a qualitative evaluation about the likelihood of an impairment of goodwill or to bypass the qualitative evaluation and test goodwill for impairment using a two-step quantitative test. If the qualitative evaluation (referred to as "step zero") is elected and the assessment results in a determination that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying amount, the two-step quantitative impairment test is not necessary. However, the quantitative impairment test is required if management concludes it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying amount based on the step zero assessment.
 
If the carrying amount of the reporting unit, including goodwill, exceeds its fair value, the implied fair value of goodwill must be calculated in the same manner as goodwill in a business combination. The fair value of a reporting unit is allocated to all assets and liabilities of that unit as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. The excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill. If the implied fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying amount, goodwill is written down to its implied fair value.
 
PPL (for its U.K. Regulated and Kentucky Regulated segments), and individually, LKE, LG&E and KU elected to perform the qualitative step zero evaluation of goodwill in the fourth quarteras of 2016.October 1, 2017. These evaluations considered the excess of fair value over the carrying value of each reporting unit that was calculated during step one of the quantitative impairment tests performed in the fourth quarter of 2015, and the relevant events and circumstances that occurred since those tests were performed including:

current year financial performance versus the prior year,year;
changes in planned capital expenditures,expenditures;
the consistency of forecasted free cash flows,flows;
earnings quality and sustainability,sustainability;
changes in market participant discount rates,rates;
changes in long-term growth rates
changes in PPL's market capitalization,capitalization; and,
the overall economic and regulatory environments in which these regulated entities operate.



144


Table of Contents


Based on these evaluations, management concluded it was not more likely than not that the fair value of these reporting units was less than their carrying value. As such, the two-step quantitative impairment test was not performed and no impairment was recognized.
 
(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)

Asset Retirement Obligations
 
PPL and its subsidiaries record liabilities to reflect various legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets. Initially, this obligation is measured at fair value and offset with an increase in the value of the capitalized asset, which is depreciated over the asset's useful life. Until the obligation is settled, the liability is increased through the recognition of accretion expense classified within "Other operation and maintenance" on the Statements of Income to reflect changes in the obligation due to the passage of time. For LKE, LG&E and KU, all ARO accretion and depreciation expenses are reclassified as a regulatory asset. ARO regulatory assets associated with approved ECRcertain CCR projects for CCRs are amortized to expense over a period of 10 to 25 years based on retirement expenditures made related to the obligations.in accordance with regulatory approvals. For other AROs, at the time of retirement, the related ARO regulatory asset is offset against the associated cost of removal regulatory liability, PP&E and ARO liability.
 
Estimated ARO costs and settlement dates, which affect the carrying value of the ARO and the related capitalized asset, are reviewed periodically to ensure that any material changes are incorporated into the latest estimate of the ARO. Any change to the capitalized asset, positive or negative, is generally amortized over the remaining life of the associated long-lived asset. See Note 6 and Note 19 for additional information on AROs.
 

Table of Contents

Compensation and Benefits
 
Defined Benefits (All Registrants)
 
Certain PPL subsidiaries sponsor various defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans. An asset or liability is recorded to recognize the funded status of all defined benefit plans with an offsetting entry to AOCI or, for LG&E, KU and PPL Electric, to regulatory assets or liabilities. Consequently, the funded status of all defined benefit plans is fully recognized on the Balance Sheets.
 
The expected return on plan assets is determined based on a market-related value of plan assets, which is calculated by rolling forward the prior year market-related value with contributions, disbursements and long-term expected return on investments. One-fifth of the difference between the actual value and the expected value is added (or subtracted if negative) to the expected value to determine the new market-related value.
 
PPL uses an accelerated amortization method for the recognition of gains and losses for its defined benefit pension plans. Under the accelerated method, actuarial gains and losses in excess of 30% of the plan's projected benefit obligation are amortized on a straight-line basis over one-half of the expected average remaining service of active plan participants. Actuarial gains and losses in excess of 10% of the greater of the plan's projected benefit obligation or the market-related value of plan assets and less than 30% of the plan's projected benefit obligation are amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected average remaining service period of active plan participants.
 
See Note 6 for a discussion of the regulatory treatment of defined benefit costs and Note 11 for a discussion of defined benefits.

Discount Rate Change for U.K. Pension Plans (PPL)
 
In selecting the discount rate for its U.K. pension plans, WPD historically used a single weighted-average discount rate in the calculation of net periodic defined benefit cost. WPD began using individual spot rates to measure service cost and interest cost for the calculation of net periodic defined benefit cost in 2016. In 2016, this change in discount rate resulted in lower net periodic defined benefit costs recognized on PPL's Statement of Income of $43 million ($34 million after-tax or $0.05 per share).

See Note 11 for additional information.

Stock-Based Compensation (PPL, PPL Electric and LKE)
 
PPL has several stock-based compensation plans for purposes of granting stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance units to certain employees as well as stock units and restricted stock units to directors. PPL grants most stock-basedstock-


145


Table of Contents


based awards in the first quarter of each year. PPL and its subsidiaries recognize compensation expense for stock-based awards based on the fair value method. Forfeitures of awards are recognized when they occur. See Note 10 for a discussion of stock-based compensation. All awards are recorded as equity or a liability on the Balance Sheets. Stock-based compensation is primarily included in "Other operation and maintenance" on the Statements of Income. Stock-based compensation expense for PPL Electric and LKE includes an allocation of PPL Services' expense.
 
Taxes
 
Income Taxes
 
(All Registrants)
 
PPL and its domestic subsidiaries file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return.
 
The Registrants have completed or made reasonable estimates of the effects of the TCJA and reflected these amounts in their December 31, 2017 financial statements. The Registrants continue to evaluate the application of the TCJA and have used significant management judgment to make certain assumptions concerning the application of various components of the law in the calculation of 2017 income tax expense. The current and deferred components of the income tax expense calculations that the Registrants consider provisional due to uncertainty either with respect to the technical application of the law or the quantification of the impact of the law include (but are not limited to): tax depreciation, deductible executive compensation, and the accumulated foreign earnings used to calculate the deemed dividend included in PPL's taxable income in 2017 along with the impact of associated foreign tax credits and related valuation allowances. The Registrants believe that classification of these items as provisional is appropriate. The Registrants have accounted for these items based on their interpretation of the TCJA.

Further interpretive guidance on the TCJA from the IRS, Treasury, the Joint Committee on Taxation through its "Blue Book" or from Congress in the form of Technical Corrections may differ from the Registrants' interpretation of the TCJA.

Significant management judgment is also required in developing the Registrants' provision for income taxes, primarily due to the uncertainty related to tax positions taken or expected to be taken in tax returns, valuation allowances on deferred tax assets and whether the undistributed earnings of WPD are considered indefinitely reinvested.
 
Significant management judgment is also required to determine the amount of benefit to be recognized in relation to an uncertain tax position. The Registrants use a two-step process to evaluate tax positions. The first step requires an entity to determine whether, based on the technical merits supporting a particular tax position, it is more likely than not (greater than a 50% chance) that the tax position will be sustained. This determination assumes that the relevant taxing authority will examine

Table of Contents

the tax position and is aware of all the relevant facts surrounding the tax position. The second step requires an entity to recognize in the financial statements the benefit of a tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition criterion. The benefit recognized is measured at the largest amount of benefit that has a likelihood of realization, upon settlement, that exceeds 50%. The amounts ultimately paid upon resolution of issues raised by taxing authorities may differ materially from the amounts accrued and may materially impact the financial statements of the Registrants in future periods.
 
Deferred income taxes reflect the net future tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for accounting purposes and their basis for income tax purposes, as well as the tax effects of net operating losses and tax credit carryforwards.
 
The Registrants record valuation allowances to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts that are more likely than not to be realized. The Registrants consider the reversal of temporary differences, future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in initially recording and subsequently reevaluating the need for valuation allowances. If the Registrants determine that they are able to realize deferred tax assets in the future in excess of recorded net deferred tax assets, adjustments to the valuation allowances increase income by reducing tax expense in the period that such determination is made. Likewise, if the Registrants determine that they are not able to realize all or part of net deferred tax assets in the future, adjustments to the valuation allowances would decrease income by increasing tax expense in the period that such determination is made.
 
The Registrants defer investment tax credits when the credits are utilized and amortize the deferred amounts over the average lives of the related assets.
 
The Registrants recognize interest and penalties in "Income Taxes" on their Statements of Income.


146


Table of Contents



See Note 5 for additional discussion regarding income taxes, including the impact of the TCJA and management's conclusion that the undistributed earnings of WPD are considered indefinitely reinvested. Based on this conclusion, PPL Global does not record U.S. taxes on WPD's undistributed earnings.
 
The provision for PPL's, PPL Electric's, LKE's, LG&E's and KU's deferred income taxes for regulatedregulatory assets and liabilities is based upon the ratemaking principles reflected in rates established by the regulators. The difference in the provision for deferred income taxes for regulatedregulatory assets and liabilities and the amount that otherwise would be recorded under GAAP is deferred and included on the Balance SheetSheets in noncurrent "Regulatory assets" or "Regulatory liabilities."
 
(PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU)
 
The income tax provision for PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU is calculated in accordance with an intercompany tax sharing agreement, which provides that taxable income be calculated as if PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E, KU and any domestic subsidiaries each filed a separate return. Tax benefits are not shared between companies. The entity that generates a tax benefit is the entity that is entitled to the tax benefit. The effect of PPL filing a consolidated tax return is taken into account in the settlement of current taxes and the recognition of deferred taxes.

At December 31, the following intercompany tax receivables (payables) were recorded:
2016 20152017 2016
PPL Electric$13
 $56
$61
 $13
LKE1
 (10)(23) 1
LG&E(18) 4

 (18)
KU(29) (5)
 (29)
 
Taxes, Other Than Income (All Registrants)
 
The Registrants present sales taxes in "Other current liabilities" and PPL presents value-added taxes in "Taxes" on the Balance Sheets. These taxes are not reflected on the Statements of Income. See Note 5 for details on taxes included in "Taxes, other than income" on the Statements of Income.
 

Table of Contents

Other
 
(All Registrants)
 
Leases
 
The Registrants evaluate whether arrangements entered into contain leases for accounting purposes. See Note 9 for additional information.
 
Fuel, Materials and Supplies
 
Fuel, natural gas stored underground and materials and supplies are valued using the average cost method. Fuel costs for electric generation are charged to expense as used. For LG&E, natural gas supply costs are charged to expense as delivered to the distribution system. See Note 6 for further discussion of the fuel adjustment clause and gas supply clause.

(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
 
"Fuel, materials and supplies" on the Balance Sheets consisted of the following at December 31:
PPL LKE LG&E KUPPL LKE LG&E KU
2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016
Fuel$158
 $168
 $158
 $168
 $60
 $71
 $98
 $97
$107
 $158
 $107
 $158
 $45
 $60
 $62
 $98
Natural gas stored underground (a)42
 42
 42
 42
 42
 42
 
 
43
 42
 43
 42
 43
 42
 
 
Materials and supplies156
 147
 97
 88
 41
 38
 56
 50
170
 156
 104
 97
 43
 41
 61
 56
Total$356
 $357
 $297
 $298
 $143
 $151
 $154
 $147
$320
 $356
 $254
 $297
 $131
 $143
 $123
 $154
 
(a)Natural gas stored underground is primarily held to serve retail customers.


147


Table of Contents


Guarantees (All Registrants)
 
Generally, the initial measurement of a guarantee liability is the fair value of the guarantee at its inception. However, there are certain guarantees excluded from the scope of accounting guidance and other guarantees that are not subject to the initial recognition and measurement provisions of accounting guidance that only require disclosure. See Note 13 for further discussion of recorded and unrecorded guarantees.
 
Treasury Stock (PPL and PPL Electric)(PPL)
 
PPL and PPL Electric restorerestores all shares of common stock acquired to authorized but unissued shares of common stock upon acquisition.
 
Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions (PPL)
 
WPD's functional currency is the GBP, which is the local currency in the U.K. As such, assets and liabilities are translated to U.S. dollars at the exchange rates on the date of consolidation and related revenues and expenses are generally translated at average exchange rates prevailing during the period included in PPL's results of operations. Adjustments resulting from foreign currency translation are recorded in AOCI.
 
Gains or losses relating to foreign currency transactions are recognized in "Other Income (Expense) - net" on the Statements of Income. See Note 15 for additional information.
 
New Accounting Guidance Adopted(All Registrants)

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
Effective January 1, 2016, the Registrants adopted accounting guidance to simplify the accounting for share-based payment transactions. The guidance requires excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies to be recorded as income tax benefit or expense on the statement of income, eliminates the requirement that excess tax benefits be realized before companies can recognize them and changes the threshold for statutory income tax withholding requirements to qualify for equity classification to the

Table of Contents

maximum statutory tax rates in the applicable jurisdictions. This guidance also changes the classification of excess tax benefits to an operating activity and employee taxes paid when shares are withheld to satisfy the employer's statutory income tax withholding obligation to a financing activity on the statement of cash flows and allows entities to make a policy election to either estimate forfeitures or recognize them when they occur. The adoption of this guidance had the following impacts:
Using the required prospective method of transition, for the year ended December 31, 2016, PPL recorded tax benefits of $10 million ($0.01 per share), and PPL Electric recorded tax benefits of $6 million, related to excess tax benefits for awards that were exercised and vested. These amounts were recorded to "Income Taxes" on the Statements of Income and "Deferred income taxes" on the Balance Sheets. The impact on LKE was not significant.

PPL elected to use the prospective method of transition for classifying excess tax benefits as an Operating activity on the Statement of Cash Flows. The amounts classified as Financing activities in the prior periods were not significant.

Upon adoption, using the required modified retrospective method of transition, PPL recorded a cumulative effect adjustment of $7 million to increase "Earnings reinvested" and decrease "Deferred income taxes" on the Balance Sheet related to prior period unrecognized excess tax benefits.

PPL has historically presented employee taxes paid for net settled awards as a Financing activity on the Statement of Cash Flows. Therefore, there is no transition impact for this requirement.

PPL has elected to recognize forfeitures when they occur. Due to past experience of insignificant forfeitures, there is no transition impact of this policy election.

2. Segment and Related Information
 
(PPL)
 
PPL is organized into three segments: U.K. Regulated, Kentucky Regulated and Pennsylvania Regulated. PPL's segments are segmented by geographic location.
 
The U.K. Regulated segment consists of PPL Global, which primarily includes WPD's regulated electricity distribution operations, the results of hedging the translation of WPD's earnings from GBP into U.S. dollars, and certain costs, such as U.S. income taxes, administrative costs, and certain acquisition-related financing costs.
 
The Kentucky Regulated segment consists primarily of LKE's regulated electricity generation, transmission and distribution operations of LG&E and KU, as well as LG&E's regulated distribution and sale of natural gas. In addition, certain acquisition-related financing costs are allocated to the Kentucky Regulated segment.
 
The Pennsylvania Regulated segment includes the regulated electricity transmission and distribution operations of PPL Electric. In addition, certain costs are allocated to the Pennsylvania Regulated segment.
 
"Corporate and Other" primarily includes financing costs incurred at the corporate level that have not been allocated or assigned to the segments, as well as certain other unallocated costs, which is presented to reconcile segment information to PPL's consolidated results.
 
On June 1, 2015, PPL completed the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply, which substantially represented PPL's Supply segment. As a result of this transaction, PPL no longer has a Supply segment.segment and its results are presented in "Discontinued Operations". See Note 8 for additional information. 

FinancialIncome Statement data for the segments and reconciliation to PPL's consolidated results for the years ended December 31 are as follows: 


148
 2016 2015 2014
Income Statement Data     
Operating Revenues from external customers (a)     
U.K. Regulated$2,207
 $2,410
 $2,621
Kentucky Regulated3,141
 3,115
 3,168
Pennsylvania Regulated2,156
 2,124
 2,044
Corporate and Other13
 20
 19
Total$7,517
 $7,669
 $7,852


Table of Contents


 2017 2016 2015
Operating Revenues from external customers (a)     
U.K. Regulated$2,091
 $2,207
 $2,410
Kentucky Regulated3,156
 3,141
 3,115
Pennsylvania Regulated2,195
 2,156
 2,124
Corporate and Other5
 13
 20
Total$7,447
 $7,517
 $7,669
      
Depreciation 
    
U.K. Regulated$230
 $233
 $242
Kentucky Regulated439
 404
 382
Pennsylvania Regulated309
 253
 214
Corporate and Other30
 36
 45
Total$1,008
 $926
 $883
      
Amortization (b) 
  
  
U.K. Regulated$34
 $16
 $6
Kentucky Regulated24
 29
 27
Pennsylvania Regulated33
 32
 26
Corporate and Other6
 3
 
Total$97
 $80
 $59
      
Unrealized (gains) losses on derivatives and other hedging activities (c)     
U.K. Regulated$166
 $13
 $(88)
Kentucky Regulated6
 6
 11
Corporate and Other6
 
 
Total$178
 $19
 $(77)
      
Interest Expense 
  
  
U.K. Regulated$397
 $402
 $417
Kentucky Regulated261
 260
 232
Pennsylvania Regulated142
 129
 130
Corporate and Other101
 97
 92
Total$901
 $888
 $871
      
Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes 
  
  
U.K. Regulated$804
 $1,479
 $1,249
Kentucky Regulated645
 640
 547
Pennsylvania Regulated575
 550
 416
Corporate and Other (d)(112) (119) (144)
Total$1,912
 $2,550
 $2,068
      
Income Taxes (e) 
  
  
U.K. Regulated$152
 $233
 $128
Kentucky Regulated359
 242
 221
Pennsylvania Regulated216
 212
 164
Corporate and Other (d)57
 (39) (48)
Total$784
 $648
 $465
      
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits (f) 
  
  
U.K. Regulated$66
 $31
 $45
Kentucky Regulated294
 291
 236
Pennsylvania Regulated257
 221
 220
Corporate and Other (d)90
 17
 (73)
Total$707
 $560
 $428


149
 2016 2015 2014
      
Depreciation 
    
U.K. Regulated$233
 $242
 $337
Kentucky Regulated404
 382
 354
Pennsylvania Regulated253
 214
 185
Corporate and Other36
 45
 47
Total$926
 $883
 $923
      
Amortization (b) 
  
  
U.K. Regulated$16
 $6
 $17
Kentucky Regulated29
 27
 25
Pennsylvania Regulated32
 26
 19
Corporate and Other3
 
 4
Total$80
 $59
 $65
      
Unrealized (gains) losses on derivatives and other hedging activities (c)     
U.K. Regulated$13
 $(88) $(199)
Kentucky Regulated6
 11
 12
Total$19
 $(77) $(187)
      
Interest Expense 
  
  
U.K. Regulated$402
 $417
 $461
Kentucky Regulated260
 232
 219
Pennsylvania Regulated129
 130
 122
Corporate and Other97
 92
 41
Total$888
 $871
 $843
      
Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes 
  
  
U.K. Regulated$1,479
 $1,249
 $1,311
Kentucky Regulated640
 547
 501
Pennsylvania Regulated550
 416
 423
Corporate and Other (d)(119) (144) (106)
Total$2,550
 $2,068
 $2,129
      
Income Taxes (e) 
  
  
U.K. Regulated$233
 $128
 $329
Kentucky Regulated242
 221
 189
Pennsylvania Regulated212
 164
 160
Corporate and Other (d)(39) (48) 14
Total$648
 $465
 $692
      
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits (f) 
  
  
U.K. Regulated$31
 $45
 $94
Kentucky Regulated291
 236
 449
Pennsylvania Regulated221
 220
 87
Corporate and Other (d)17
 (73) 36
Total$560
 $428
 $666
      
Net Income 
  
  
U.K. Regulated$1,246
 $1,121
 $982
Kentucky Regulated398
 326
 312
Pennsylvania Regulated338
 252
 263
Corporate and Other (d)(80) (96) (120)
Discontinued Operations (g)
 (921) 300
Total$1,902
 $682
 $1,737


Table of Contents


 2016 2015 2014
Cash Flow Data     
Expenditures for long-lived assets 
  
  
U.K. Regulated$1,031
 $1,242
 $1,438
Kentucky Regulated791
 1,210
 1,262
Pennsylvania Regulated1,134
 1,107
 957
Corporate and Other1
 11
 66
Total$2,957
 $3,570
 $3,723
 As of December 31,
 2016 2015
Balance Sheet Data 
  
Total Assets 
  
U.K. Regulated (h)$14,537
 $16,669
Kentucky Regulated14,037
 13,756
Pennsylvania Regulated9,426
 8,511
Corporate and Other (i)315
 365
Total$38,315
 $39,301
 2017 2016 2015
      
Net Income 
  
  
U.K. Regulated$652
 $1,246
 $1,121
Kentucky Regulated286
 398
 326
Pennsylvania Regulated359
 338
 252
Corporate and Other (d)(169) (80) (96)
Discontinued Operations (g)
 
 (921)
Total$1,128
 $1,902
 $682

Geographic data for the years ended December 31 are as follows: 
 2016 2015 2014
Geographic Data 
  
  
Revenues from external customers 
  
  
U.K.$2,207
 $2,410
 $2,621
U.S.5,310
 5,259
 5,231
Total$7,517
 $7,669
 $7,852
 As of December 31,
 2016 2015
Long-Lived Assets 
  
U.K. (h)$11,177
 $12,487
U.S.19,595
 18,569
Total$30,772
 $31,056
(a)See Note 1 for additional information on Operating Revenues.
(b)Represents non-cash expense items that include amortization of regulatory assets, debt discounts and premiums, debt issuance costs, emission allowances and RECs.
(c)Includes unrealized gains and losses from economic activity. See Note 17 for additional information.
(d)2015 and 2014 includeincludes certain costs related to the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply, including deferred income tax expense, transition costs and separation benefits for PPL Services employees. See Note 8 for additional information.
(e)Represents both current and deferred income taxes, including investment tax credits. See Note 5 for additional information on the impact of the TCJA in 2017.
(f)Represents a non-cash expense item that is also included in "Income Taxes."
(g)2015 includes an $879 million loss on the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply and five months of Supply segment earnings. 2014 includes a gain of $237 million ($137 million after-tax) on the sale of the Montana hydroelectric generating facilities. See Note 8 for additional information on these transactions.

Cash Flow data for the segments and reconciliation to PPL's consolidated results for the years ended December 31 are as follows: 
 2017 2016 2015
Expenditures for long-lived assets 
  
  
U.K. Regulated$1,015
 $1,031
 $1,242
Kentucky Regulated892
 791
 1,210
Pennsylvania Regulated1,254
 1,134
 1,107
Corporate and Other10
 1
 11
Total$3,171
 $2,957
 $3,570

The following provides Balance Sheet data for the segments and reconciliation to PPL's consolidated results as of:
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
Total Assets 
  
U.K. Regulated (a)$16,813
 $14,537
Kentucky Regulated14,468
 14,037
Pennsylvania Regulated10,082
 9,426
Corporate and Other (b)116
 315
Total$41,479
 $38,315

(h)(a)
Includes $10.8$12.5 billion and $12.2$10.8 billion of net PP&E as of December 31, 20162017 and December 31, 2015.2016. WPD is not subject to accounting for the effects of certain types of regulation as prescribed by GAAP.
(i)(b)Primarily consists of unallocated items, including cash, PP&E and the elimination of inter-segment transactions.

Geographic data for the years ended December 31 are as follows: 
 2017 2016 2015
Revenues from external customers 
  
  
U.K.$2,091
 $2,207
 $2,410
U.S.5,356
 5,310
 5,259
Total$7,447
 $7,517
 $7,669
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
Long-Lived Assets 
  
U.K.$12,851
 $11,177
U.S.20,936
 19,595
Total$33,787
 $30,772


150


Table of Contents


(PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU)
 
PPL Electric has two operating segments that are aggregated into a single reportable segment. LKE, LG&E and KU are individually single operating and reportable segments.
 
3. Preferred Securities
 
(PPL)
 
PPL is authorized to issue up to 10 million shares of preferred stock. No PPL preferred stock was issued or outstanding in 2017, 2016 2015 or 2014.2015.
 

Table of Contents

(PPL Electric)
 
PPL Electric is authorized to issue up to 20,629,936 shares of preferred stock. No PPL Electric preferred stock was issued or outstanding in 2017, 2016 2015 or 2014.2015.

(LG&E)
 
LG&E is authorized to issue up to 1,720,000 shares of preferred stock at a $25 par value and 6,750,000 shares of preferred stock without par value. LG&E had no preferred stock issued or outstanding in 2017, 2016 2015 or 2014.2015.
 
(KU)
 
KU is authorized to issue up to 5,300,000 shares of preferred stock and 2,000,000 shares of preference stock without par value. KU had no preferred or preference stock issued or outstanding in 2017, 2016 2015 or 2014.2015.
 
4. Earnings Per Share
 
(PPL)
 
Basic EPS is computed by dividing income available to PPL common shareowners by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the applicable period. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing income available to PPL common shareowners by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, increased by incremental shares that would be outstanding if potentially dilutive non-participating securities were converted to common shares as calculated using the Treasury Stock Method or If-Converted Method, as applicable.Method. Incremental non-participating securities that have a dilutive impact are detailed in the table below.
 
Reconciliations of the amounts of income and shares of PPL common stock (in thousands) for the periods ended December 31, used in the EPS calculation are:
 2016 2015 2014
Income (Numerator) 
  
  
Income from continuing operations after income taxes$1,902
 $1,603
 $1,437
Less amounts allocated to participating securities6
 6
 7
Income from continuing operations after income taxes available to PPL common
shareowners - Basic
1,896
 1,597
 1,430
Plus interest charges (net of tax) related to Equity Units (a)
 
 9
Income from continuing operations after income taxes available to PPL common
shareowners - Diluted
$1,896
 $1,597
 $1,439
      
Income (loss) from discontinued operations (net of income taxes) available to PPL
common shareowners - Basic and Diluted
$
 $(921) $300
      
Net income$1,902
 $682
 $1,737
Less amounts allocated to participating securities6
 2
 9
Net income available to PPL common shareowners - Basic1,896
 680
 1,728
Plus interest charges (net of tax) related to Equity Units (a)
 
 9
Net income available to PPL common shareowners - Diluted$1,896
 $680
 $1,737
      
Shares of Common Stock (Denominator) 
  
  
Weighted-average shares - Basic EPS677,592
 669,814
 653,504
Add incremental non-participating securities: 
  
  
Share-based payment awards (b)2,854
 2,772
 1,910
Equity Units (a)
 
 10,559
Weighted-average shares - Diluted EPS680,446
 672,586
 665,973
 2017 2016 2015
Income (Numerator) 
  
  
Income from continuing operations after income taxes$1,128
 $1,902
 $1,603
Less amounts allocated to participating securities2
 6
 6
Income from continuing operations after income taxes available to PPL common
shareowners - Basic and Diluted
$1,126
 $1,896
 $1,597
      
Income (loss) from discontinued operations (net of income taxes) available to PPL
common shareowners - Basic and Diluted
$
 $
 $(921)
      
Net income$1,128
 $1,902
 $682
Less amounts allocated to participating securities2
 6
 2
Net income available to PPL common shareowners - Basic and Diluted$1,126
 $1,896
 $680


151


Table of Contents


2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
     
Shares of Common Stock (Denominator) 
  
  
Weighted-average shares - Basic EPS685,240
 677,592
 669,814
Add incremental non-participating securities: 
  
  
Share-based payment awards (a)2,094
 2,854
 2,772
Weighted-average shares - Diluted EPS687,334
 680,446
 672,586
          
Basic EPS 
  
  
 
  
  
Available to PPL common shareowners: 
  
  
 
  
  
Income from continuing operations after income taxes$2.80
 $2.38
 $2.19
$1.64
 $2.80
 $2.38
Income (loss) from discontinued operations (net of income taxes)
 (1.37) 0.45

 
 (1.37)
Net Income$2.80
 $1.01
 $2.64
$1.64
 $2.80
 $1.01
     
Diluted EPS 
  
  
 
  
  
Available to PPL common shareowners: 
  
  
 
  
  
Income from continuing operations after income taxes$2.79
 $2.37
 $2.16
$1.64
 $2.79
 $2.37
Income (loss) from discontinued operations (net of income taxes)
 (1.36) 0.45

 
 (1.36)
Net Income$2.79
 $1.01
 $2.61
$1.64
 $2.79
 $1.01
 
(a)In 2014, the If-Converted Method was applied to the Equity Units prior to settlement. See Note 7 for additional information on the Equity Units, including the issuance of PPL common stock to settle the Purchase contracts.
(b)The Treasury Stock Method was applied to non-participating share-based payment awards.

For the year ended December 31, PPL issued common stock related to stock-based compensation plans and DRIP as follows (in thousands):
 20162017
Stock-based compensation plans (a)3,2241,748
DRIP1,5621,552
 
(a)Includes stock options exercised, vesting of performance units, vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock units and conversion of stock units granted to directors.

See Note 7 for additional information on common stock issued under ATM Program.
 
For the years ended December 31, the following shares (in thousands) were excluded from the computations of diluted EPS because the effect would have been antidilutive:
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Stock options696
 1,087
 1,816
696
 696
 1,087
Performance units176
 36
 5

 176
 36
Restricted stock units
 
 31
 
5. Income and Other Taxes
 
(All Registrants)
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA)

On December 22, 2017, President Trump signed into law the TCJA. Substantially all of the provisions of the TCJA are effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017. The TCJA includes significant changes to the taxation of corporations, including provisions specifically applicable to regulated public utilities. The more significant changes that impact the Registrants are:

The reduction in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from a top marginal rate of 35% to a flat rate of 21%, effective January 1, 2018;
The exclusion from U.S. federal taxable income of dividends from foreign subsidiaries and the associated "transition tax;"
Limitations on the tax deductibility of interest expense, with an exception to these limitations for regulated public utilities;
Full current year expensing of capital expenditures with an exception for regulated public utilities that qualify for the exception to the interest expense limitation; and


152


Table of Contents


The continuation of certain rate normalization requirements for accelerated depreciation benefits. For non-regulated businesses, the TCJA generally provides for full expensing of property acquired after September 27, 2017.

Under GAAP, the tax effect of changes in tax laws must be recognized in the period in which the law is enacted, or December 2017 for TCJA. The changes enacted by the TCJA were recorded as an adjustment to the Registrants' deferred tax provision, and have been reflected in "Income Taxes" on the Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2017 as follows:
 PPL PPL Electric LKE LG&E KU
Income tax expense (benefit)$321
 $(13) $112
 $
 $

The components of these adjustments are discussed below:

Reduction of U.S. Federal Corporate Income Tax Rate

GAAP requires deferred tax assets and liabilities to be measured at the enacted tax rate expected to apply when temporary differences are to be realized or settled. Thus, at the date of enactment, the Registrants' deferred taxes were remeasured based upon the new U.S. federal corporate income tax rate of 21%. For PPL’s regulated entities, the changes in deferred taxes were, in large part, recorded as an offset to either a regulatory asset or regulatory liability and will be reflected in future rates charged to customers. The rate reduction on non-regulated deferred tax assets and liabilities were recorded as an adjustment to the Registrants' deferred tax provision, and have been reflected in "Income Taxes" on the Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2017 as follows:
 PPL PPL Electric LKE LG&E KU
Income tax expense (benefit)$220
 $(13) $112
 $
 $

As indicated in Note 1 - "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Income Taxes", PPL’s U.S. regulated operations' accounting for income taxes are impacted by rate regulation. Therefore, reductions in accumulated deferred income tax balances due to the reduction in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate to 21% under the provisions of the TCJA may result in amounts previously collected from utility customers for these deferred taxes to be refundable to such customers over a period of time. The TCJA includes provisions that stipulate how these excess deferred taxes are to be passed back to customers for certain accelerated tax depreciation benefits. Potential refunds of other deferred taxes will be determined by the Registrants’ regulators. The Balance Sheets at December 31, 2017 reflect the increase to the Registrants' net regulatory liabilities as a result of the TCJA as follows:
 PPL PPL Electric LKE LG&E KU
Net Increase in Regulatory Liabilities$2,185
 $1,019
 $1,166
 $532
 $634

Prior to the TCJA, PPL Electric had recorded a net regulatory asset related to taxes recoverable on certain property related deferred taxes, the tax benefit of which was received by the customer. The net regulatory asset represents the future taxes owed in excess of taxes paid by the customer to date, with an additional tax gross-up. As a result of the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate reduction enacted by the TCJA, the future taxes expected to be due are now less than taxes funded through rates, resulting in a net regulatory liability.

Transition Tax

The TCJA included a conversion from a worldwide tax system to a territorial tax system, effective January 1, 2018. In the transition to the territorial regime, a one-time transition tax was imposed on PPL’s unrepatriated accumulated foreign earnings in 2017. These earnings were treated as a taxable deemed dividend to PPL of approximately $462 million. As the PPL consolidated U.S. group had a taxable loss for 2017, inclusive of the taxable deemed dividend, the foreign tax credits associated with the deemed dividend were recorded as a deferred tax asset. However, it is expected that under the TCJA, the current and prior year foreign tax credit carryforwards will not be fully realizable.

As a result, the net deferred income tax expense impact of the deemed repatriation was $101 million and was recorded in "Income Taxes" on the PPL Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2017 and "Deferred tax liabilities" on the PPL Balance Sheet at December 31, 2017.

SEC Guidance on Accounting for TCJA



153


Table of Contents


On December 22, 2017, the SEC issued guidance for accounting for income taxes in the event that information is not available or is incomplete for purposes of reflecting the impact of the TCJA. The SEC guidance provides a period of up to one year (the measurement period) to complete the analysis and accounting to properly reflect the TCJA. The SEC guidance provides a three-step process that companies should apply to each reporting period within the measurement period:

1.A company should record the effects of the TCJA for which the accounting is complete.
2.
A company should report provisional amounts (or adjustments to provisional amounts) for the effects of the TCJA for which the accounting is not complete, but for which a reasonable estimate can be determined. Provisional amounts and any related adjustments to such provisional amounts should be recorded to income tax expense through continuing operations in the period they are identified.
3.
A company should continue to apply GAAP based on the tax law in effect just prior to enactment of TCJA if a reasonable estimate of the specific effect of the TCJA cannot be made.

The measurement period ends at the earlier of the time the company finalizes its accounting for the impact of the TCJA or one year.

The Registrants have completed or made reasonable estimates of the effects of the TCJA and reflected these amounts in their December 31, 2017 financial statements. The Registrants continue to evaluate the application of the TCJA and have made certain assumptions concerning the application of various components of the law in the calculation of 2017 income tax expense. The current and deferred components of the income tax expense calculations that the Registrants consider provisional within the meaning of the SEC guidance due to uncertainty either with respect to the technical application of the law or the quantification of the impact of the law include (but are not limited to): tax depreciation, deductible executive compensation, and the accumulated foreign earnings used to calculate the deemed dividend included in PPL’s taxable income in 2017 along with the impact of associated foreign tax credits and related valuation allowances. The Registrants believe that classification of these items as provisional is appropriate. The Registrants have accounted for these items based on their interpretation of the TCJA. 

Further interpretive guidance on the TCJA from the IRS, Treasury, the Joint Committee on Taxation through its “Blue Book” or from Congress in the form of Technical Corrections may differ from the Registrants' interpretation of the TCJA.

(PPL)
 
"Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes" included the following:
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Domestic income$1,463
 $968
 $922
$874
 $1,463
 $968
Foreign income1,087
 1,100
 1,207
1,038
 1,087
 1,100
Total$2,550
 $2,068
 $2,129
$1,912
 $2,550
 $2,068
 
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for accounting purposes and their basis for income tax purposes and the tax effects of net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. The provision for PPL's deferred income taxes for regulated assets and liabilities is based upon the ratemaking principles of the applicable jurisdiction. See Notes 1 and 6 for additional information.
 
Net deferred tax assets have been recognized based on management's estimates of future taxable income for the U.S. and the U.K.
 
Significant components of PPL's deferred income tax assets and liabilities were as follows:


154


Table of Contents


2016 20152017 (a) 2016
Deferred Tax Assets      
Deferred investment tax credits$51
 $50
$33
 $51
Regulatory liabilities94
 123
62
 94
Income taxes due to customer (b)499
 
Accrued pension costs250
 217
159
 250
Federal loss carryforwards565
 587
356
 565
State loss carryforwards326
 319
409
 326
Federal and state tax credit carryforwards256
 201
455
 256
Foreign capital loss carryforwards302
 387
329
 302
Foreign loss carryforwards3
 4
2
 3
Foreign - pensions41
 171
(32) 41
Foreign - regulatory obligations6
 12
2
 6
Foreign - other5
 8
7
 5
Contributions in aid of construction141
 139
134
 141
Domestic - other188
 209
104
 188
Unrealized losses on qualifying derivatives20
 15
10
 20
Valuation allowances (a)(593) (662)
Valuation allowances(838) (593)
Total deferred tax assets1,655
 1,780
1,691
 1,655
      
Deferred Tax Liabilities      
Domestic plant - net4,325
 3,875
Taxes recoverable through future rates170
 162
Domestic plant - net (b)3,168
 4,325
Taxes recoverable through future rates (b)
 170
Regulatory assets343
 332
211
 343
Reacquired debt costs25
 28
15
 25
Foreign plant - net640
 777
726
 640
Domestic - other14
 24
9
 14
Total deferred tax liabilities5,517
 5,198
4,129
 5,517
Net deferred tax liability$3,862
 $3,418
$2,438
 $3,862
 
(a)Includes $77 million of deferred tax assets related to state loss carryforwards and related valuation allowances previously reflected on the PPL Energy Supply Segment. The deferredDeferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2017 reflect the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate reduction from 35% to 21% enacted by the TCJA.
(b)The impact on net deferred tax liabilities as a result of the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate reduction enacted by the TCJA is primarily related valuation allowance remained with PPL afterto plant (net of net operating losses) and resulted in a regulatory liability for income taxes due to customers, the spinoff.deferred tax impact of which is reflected as a deferred tax asset.

State deferred taxes are determined on a by entity, by jurisdiction basis. As a result, $27$24 million and $22$27 million of net deferred tax assets are shown as "Other noncurrent assets" on the Balance Sheets for 20162017 and 2015.2016.

At December 31, 2016,2017, PPL had the following loss and tax credit carryforwards, related deferred tax assets and valuation allowances recorded against the deferred tax assets.
Gross Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Allowance ExpirationGross Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Allowance Expiration
Loss carryforwards              
Federal net operating losses(a)$1,583
 $554
 $
 2029-2035$1,662
 $349
 $
 2029-2037
Federal charitable contributions(a)28
 11
 
 2020-202136
 7
 
 2020-2022
State net operating losses(a)5,387
 325
 (269) 2017-20365,512
 407
 (348) 2018-2037
State charitable contributions(a)12
 1
 
 2017-202126
 2
 
 2018-2022
Foreign net operating losses17
 3
 (3) Indefinite10
 2
 
 Indefinite
Foreign capital losses1,783
 302
 (302) Indefinite1,938
 329
 (329) Indefinite
Credit carryforwards              
Federal investment tax credit 133
 
 2025-2036 133
 
 2025-2036
Federal alternative minimum tax credit(b) 30
 
 Indefinite 30
 
 Indefinite
Federal foreign tax credits(c) 62
 (3) 2024-2025 267
 (148) 2024-2027
Federal - other 30
 (11) 2017-2036 24
 (8) 2019-2037
State - other 1
 
 Indefinite 1
 
 Indefinite
 


155


Table of Contents


(a)Due to the enactment of the TCJA, deferred tax assets are reflected at the new U.S. federal corporate income tax rate of 21%.
(b)The TCJA repealed the corporate alternative minimum tax (AMT) for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. The existing indefinite carryforward period for AMT credits was retained.
(c)Includes $62 million of foreign tax credits carried forward from 2016 and $205 million of additional foreign tax credits in 2017 related to the taxable deemed dividend associated with the TCJA.

Valuation allowances have been established for the amount that, more likely than not, will not be realized. The changes in deferred tax valuation allowances were as follows:

Table of Contents

  Additions      Additions    
Balance at
Beginning
of Period
 
Charged
to Income
 
Charged to
Other
Accounts
 Deductions 
Balance
at End
of Period
Balance at
Beginning
of Period
 
Charged
to Income
 
Charged to
Other
Accounts
 Deductions 
Balance
at End
of Period
2017$593
 $256
(a)$

$11

$838
2016$662
 $17
 $2

$88
(a)$593
662
 17
 2

88
(b)593
2015622
 24
 77
(b)61
(a)662
622
 24
 77
(c)61
(b)662
2014585
 57
 6
 26
 622
 
(a)Increase in valuation allowance of approximately $145 million related to expected future utilization of both 2017 foreign tax credits and pre-2017 foreign tax credits carried forward. For additional information, see the "Reconciliation of Income Tax Expense" and associated notes below.

In addition, the reduction of the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate enacted by the TCJA in 2017 resulted in a $62 million increase in federal deferred tax assets and a corresponding valuation allowance related to the federal tax benefits of state net operating losses.
(b)The reductions of the U.K. statutory income tax rates in 2016 and 2015 resulted in $19 million and $44 million in reductions in the deferred tax assets and corresponding valuation allowances. See "Reconciliation of Income Tax Expense" below for more information on the impact of the U.K. Finance Acts 2016 and 2015. In addition, the deferred tax assets and corresponding valuation allowances were reduced in 2016 by approximately $65 million due to the effect of foreign currency exchange rates.
(b)(c)Valuation allowance related to the deferred tax assets previously reflected on the PPL Energy Supply Segment. The deferred tax assets and related valuation allowance remained with PPL after the spinoff.

PPL Global does not pay or record U.S. income taxes on the undistributedunremitted earnings of WPD, as management has determined that thesuch earnings are indefinitely reinvested for accounting purposes.reinvested. Current year distributions from WPD to the U.S. are sourced from a portion of the current year'syear’s earnings of the WPD group. As noted above, the TCJA includes a conversion from a worldwide tax system to a territorial tax system, effective January 1, 2018. In the transition to the territorial regime, a one-time transition tax was imposed on PPL’s unrepatriated accumulated foreign earnings in 2017. These earnings were treated as a taxable deemed dividend from the U.K. The total amount of the taxable deemed dividend was approximately $462 million, including $205 million of foreign tax credits. The U.S. tax consequences of the deemed dividend have been recorded in PPL’s 2017 tax provision and are explained below. Despite this 2017 deemed dividend, there have been no material changes to the facts underlying PPL’s assertion that historically reinvested earnings of WPD as well as some portion of current year earnings will continue to be indefinitely reinvested. WPD's long-term working capital forecasts and capital expenditure projections for the foreseeable future require reinvestment of WPD's undistributed earnings. Additionally, U.S. long-term working capital forecasts and capital expenditure projections for the foreseeable future do not require or contemplate annual distributions from WPD in excess of some portion of WPD's future annual earnings. The cumulative undistributed earnings are included in "Earnings reinvested" on the Balance Sheets. The amountsamount considered indefinitely reinvested at December 31, 2016 and 2015 were $5.5 billion and $4.62017 was $6.0 billion. It is not practicable to estimate the amount of additional taxes that could be payable on these foreign earnings in the event of repatriation to the U.S.
 
Details of the components of income tax expense, a reconciliation of federal income taxes derived from statutory tax rates applied to "Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes" to income taxes for reporting purposes, and details of "Taxes, other than income" were as follows:
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)          
Current - Federal$(14) $(26) $18
$6
 $(14) $(26)
Current - State21
 25
 26
25
 21
 25
Current - Foreign80
 89
 152
45
 80
 89
Total Current Expense87
 88
 196
76
 87
 88
Deferred - Federal(a)385
 699
 299
532
 385
 699
Deferred - State89
 68
 120
88
 89
 68
Deferred - Foreign86
 41
 96
133
 86
 41
Total Deferred Expense, excluding operating loss carryforwards560
 808
 515
753
 560
 808
     
Amortization of investment tax credit(3) (4) (5)
Tax expense (benefit) of operating loss carryforwards     
Deferred - Federal (a)25
 (396) 8
Deferred - State(21) (31) (22)
Total Tax Expense (Benefit) of Operating Loss Carryforwards4
 (427) (14)
Total income taxes from continuing operations$648
 $465
 $692
     
Total income tax expense - Federal$393
 $273
 $320
Total income tax expense - State89
 62
 124
Total income tax expense - Foreign166
 130
 248
Total income taxes from continuing operations$648
 $465
 $692


156


Table of Contents


 2017 2016 2015
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)     
      
Amortization of investment tax credit(3) (3) (4)
Tax expense (benefit) of operating loss carryforwards     
Deferred - Federal (b)(16) 25
 (396)
Deferred - State(26) (21) (31)
Total Tax Expense (Benefit) of Operating Loss Carryforwards(42) 4
 (427)
Total income taxes from continuing operations$784
 $648
 $465
      
Total income tax expense - Federal$519
 $393
 $273
Total income tax expense - State87
 89
 62
Total income tax expense - Foreign178
 166
 130
Total income taxes from continuing operations$784
 $648
 $465
 
(a)Due to the enactment of the TCJA in 2017, PPL recorded the following:
$220 million of deferred income tax expense related to the impact of the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate reduction from 35% to 21% on deferred tax assets and liabilities;
$162 million of deferred tax expense related to the utilization of current year losses resulting from the taxable deemed dividend; partially offset by,
$60 million of deferred tax benefits related to the $205 million of 2017 foreign tax credits partially offset by $145 million of valuation allowances.
(b)Increase in Federalfederal loss carryforwards for 2015 primarily relates to the extension of bonus depreciation and the impact of bonus depreciation related to provision to return adjustments.

In the table above, the following income tax expense (benefits)(benefit) are excluded from income taxes from continuing operations:

Table of Contents

 2017 2016 2015
Discontinued operations - PPL Energy Supply Segment$
 $
 $(30)
Stock-based compensation recorded to Earnings Reinvested
 (7) 
Other comprehensive income(34) (6) (2)
Valuation allowance on state deferred taxes recorded to other comprehensive income(1) 1
 (4)
Total$(35) $(12) $(36)
 2016 2015 2014
Discontinued operations - PPL Energy Supply Segment$
 $(30) $198
Stock-based compensation recorded to Additional Paid-in Capital
 
 (4)
Stock-based compensation recorded to Earnings Reinvested(7) 
 
Other comprehensive income(6) (2) (190)
Valuation allowance on state deferred taxes recorded to other comprehensive income1
 (4) 
Total$(12) $(36) $4
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Reconciliation of Income Tax Expense 
  
  
 
  
  
Federal income tax on Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes at statutory tax rate - 35%$893
 $724
 $745
$669
 $893
 $724
Increase (decrease) due to: 
  
  
 
  
  
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit46
 31
 28
46
 46
 31
Valuation allowance adjustments (a)16
 24
 55
36
 16
 24
Impact of lower U.K. income tax rates (b)(177) (176) (180)(176) (177) (176)
U.S. income tax on foreign earnings - net of foreign tax credit (c)(42) 8
 63
47
 (42) 8
Federal and state tax reserves adjustments (d)
 (22) (1)
 
 (22)
Foreign income return adjustments(8) 2
 
Impact of the U.K. Finance Acts on deferred tax balances (b)(49) (91) (1)(16) (49) (91)
Depreciation not normalized(10) (5) (7)(10) (10) (5)
Interest benefit on U.K. financing entities(17) (20) (5)(16) (17) (20)
Stock-based compensation (e)(10) 
 
(3) (10) 
Deferred tax impact of U.S. tax reform (f)220
 
 
Other(2) (8) (5)(5) (4) (8)
Total increase (decrease)(245) (259) (53)115
 (245) (259)
Total income taxes from continuing operations$648
 $465
 $692
$784
 $648
 $465
Effective income tax rate25.4% 22.5% 32.5%41.0% 25.4% 22.5%
 
(a)During 2016,2017, PPL recorded deferred tax expense foran increase in valuation allowances of $23 million primarily related to increased Pennsylvania net operating loss carryforwardsforeign tax credits recorded in 2016. The future utilization of these credits is expected to be unutilized.lower as a result of the TCJA.

During 2017 and 2016, PPL recorded deferred income tax expense of $16 million and $13 million for valuation allowances primarily related to increased Pennsylvania net operating loss carryforwards expected to be unutilized.

During 2015, PPL recorded $24 million of deferred income tax expense related to deferred tax valuation allowances. PPL recorded state deferred income tax expense of $12 million primarily related to increased Pennsylvania net operating loss carryforwards expected to be unutilized and $12 million of


157


Table of Contents


federal deferred income tax expense primarily related to federal tax credit carryforwards that are expected to expire as a result of lower future taxable earnings due to the extension of bonus depreciation.
As a result of the PPL Energy Supply spinoff announcement, PPL recorded $50 million of deferred income tax expense during 2014, to adjust the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets primarily for state net operating loss carryforwards that were previously supported by the future earnings of PPL Energy Supply. See Note 8 for additional information on the spinoff.
(b)The U.K. Finance Act 2016, enacted in September 2016, reducesreduced the U.K. statutory income tax rate effective April 1, 2020 from 18% to 17%. As a result, PPL reduced its net deferred tax liabilities and recognized a $42 million deferred income tax benefit during 2016.

The U.K. Finance Act 2015, enacted in November 2015, reduced the U.K. statutory income tax rate from 20% to 19% effective April 1, 2017 and from 19% to 18% effective April 1, 2020. As a result, PPL reduced its net deferred tax liabilities and recognized a $90 million deferred income tax benefit during 2015, related to both rate decreases.
(c)During 2016,2017, PPL recorded lowera federal income taxestax benefit of $35 million primarily attributable to foreign tax credit carryforwards, arising from a decision to amend prior year tax returns to claim foreign tax credits rather than deduct foreign taxes. This decision was prompted by changes to the Company's most recent business plan.U.K. pension contributions.

During 2015,2017, PPL recorded deferred income tax expense of $83 million primarily related to enactment of the TCJA. The enacted tax law included a conversion from a worldwide tax system to a territorial tax system, effective January 1, 2018. In the transition to the territorial regime, a one-time transition tax was imposed on PPL’s unrepatriated accumulated foreign earnings in 2017. These earnings were treated as a taxable deemed dividend to PPL of approximately $462 million, including $205 million of foreign tax credits. As the PPL consolidated U.S. group had a taxable loss for 2017, inclusive of the taxable deemed dividend, these credits were recorded as a deferred tax asset. However, it is expected that under the TCJA, only $83 million of the $205 million of foreign tax credits will be realized in the carry forward period. Accordingly, a valuation allowance on the current year foreign tax credits in the amount of $122 million has been recorded to reflect the reduction in the future utilization of the credits. The foreign tax credits associated with the deemed repatriation result in a gross carryforward and corresponding deferred tax asset of $205 million offset by a valuation allowance of $122 million.

During 2016, PPL recorded lower income taxes primarily attributable to foreign tax credit carryforwards, arising from a decrease in taxable dividends.
During 2014, PPL recorded $47 million of incomedecision to amend prior year tax expense primarily attributablereturns to taxable dividends.claim foreign tax credits rather than deduct foreign taxes. This decision was prompted by changes to the Company's most recent business plan.
(d)
During 2015, PPL recorded a $12$9 million income tax benefit related to a planned amendment of a prior period tax return and a $12 million income tax benefit related to the settlement of the IRS audit for the tax years 1998-2011.
(e)During 2016, PPL recorded lower income tax expense related to the application of new stock-based compensation accounting guidance. See Note 1 for additional information.
(f)During 2017, PPL recorded deferred income tax expense related to the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate reduction from 35% to 21% enacted by the TCJA.
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Taxes, other than income          
State gross receipts (a)$100
 $89
 $102
$102
 $100
 $89
State capital stock(6) 
 
Foreign property135
 148
 157
127
 135
 148
Domestic Other66
 62
 58
69
 66
 62
Total$301
 $299
 $317
$292
 $301
 $299
  
(a)The decrease in
In 2015, was primarily due to the settlement of a 2011 gross receipts tax audit resultingresulted in the reversal of $17$17 million of previously recognized reserves.


Table of Contents

(PPL Electric)
 
The provision for PPL Electric's deferred income taxes for regulated assets and liabilities is based upon the ratemaking principles reflected in rates established by the PUC and the FERC. The difference in the provision for deferred income taxes for regulated assets and liabilities and the amount that otherwise would be recorded under GAAP is deferred and included in "Regulatory assets" or "Regulated"Regulatory liabilities" on the Balance Sheets.
 


158


Table of Contents


Significant components of PPL Electric's deferred income tax assets and liabilities were as follows:
2016 20152017 (a) 2016
Deferred Tax Assets      
Accrued pension costs$107
 $92
$63
 $107
Contributions in aid of construction112
 111
117
 112
Regulatory liabilities34
 56
25
 34
Income taxes due to customers (b)193
 
State loss carryforwards22
 27
19
 22
Federal loss carryforwards147
 146
91
 147
Other81
 87
45
 81
Total deferred tax assets503
 519
553
 503
      
Deferred Tax Liabilities      
Electric utility plant - net2,001
 1,803
Taxes recoverable through future rates141
 135
Electric utility plant - net (b)1,544
 2,001
Taxes recoverable through future rates (b)
 141
Reacquired debt costs15
 18
8
 15
Regulatory assets240
 213
150
 240
Other5
 13
5
 5
Total deferred tax liabilities2,402
 2,182
1,707
 2,402
Net deferred tax liability$1,899
 $1,663
$1,154
 $1,899

(a)Deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2017 reflect the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate reduction from 35% to 21% enacted by the TCJA.
(b)The impact on net deferred tax liabilities as a result of the U.S. federal tax rate reduction enacted by the TCJA is primarily related to plant (net of net operating losses) and resulted in a regulatory liability for income taxes due to customers, the deferred tax impact of which is reflected as a deferred tax asset.

At December 31, 2016,2017, PPL Electric had the following loss carryforwards and related deferred tax assets:
Gross Deferred Tax Asset ExpirationGross Deferred Tax Asset Expiration
Loss carryforwards(a)          
Federal net operating losses$411
 $144
 2031-2035$426
 $89
 2031-2037
Federal charitable contributions5
 2
 2020-20218
 2
 2020-2022
State net operating losses (a)327
 21
 2030-2032233
 18
 2030-2032
State charitable contributions11
 1
 2017-202113
 1
 2018-2022
 
(a)An immaterial amountDue to the enactment of valuation allowances has been recorded against the TCJA, deferred tax asset for state contributions.assets are reflected at the new U.S. federal corporate income tax rate of 21%.

Credit carryforwards were insignificant at December 31, 2016.2017.

Details of the components of income tax expense, a reconciliation of federal income taxes derived from statutory tax rates applied to "Income Before Income Taxes" to income taxes for reporting purposes, and details of "Taxes, other than income" were as follows.
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)          
Current - Federal$(29) $(80) $60
$(65) $(29) $(80)
Current - State19
 23
 15
20
 19
 23
Total Current Expense (Benefit)(10) (57) 75
(45) (10) (57)
Deferred - Federal(a)193
 287
 70
234
 193
 287
Deferred - State29
 12
 16
29
 29
 12
Total Deferred Expense, excluding operating loss carryforwards222
 299
 86
263
 222
 299
          


159


Table of Contents


2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Amortization of investment tax credit
 
 (1)
 
 
Tax expense (benefit) of operating loss carryforwards          
Deferred - Federal
 (75) 
(5) 
 (75)
Deferred - State
 (3) 

 
 (3)
Total Tax Expense (Benefit) of Operating Loss Carryforwards
 (78) 
(5) 
 (78)
Total income tax expense$212
 $164
 $160
$213
 $212
 $164
          
Total income tax expense - Federal$164
 $132
 $129
$164
 $164
 $132
Total income tax expense - State48
 32
 31
49
 48
 32
Total income tax expense$212
 $164
 $160
$213
 $212
 $164

(a)Due to the enactment of the TCJA in 2017, PPL Electric recorded a $13 million deferred tax benefit related to the impact of the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate reduction from 35% to 21% on deferred tax assets and liabilities.
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Reconciliation of Income Taxes 
  
  
 
  
  
Federal income tax on Income Before Income Taxes at statutory tax rate - 35%$193
 $146
 $148
$201
 $193
 $146
Increase (decrease) due to: 
  
  
 
  
  
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit36
 25
 22
36
 36
 25
Depreciation not normalized(8) (4) (6)(8) (8) (4)
Stock-based compensation (a)(6) 
 
(2) (6) 
Deferred tax impact of U.S. tax reform (b)(13) 
 
Other(3) (3) (4)(1) (3) (3)
Total increase (decrease)19
 18
 12
12
 19
 18
Total income tax expense$212
 $164
 $160
$213
 $212
 $164
Effective income tax rate38.4% 39.4% 37.8%37.0% 38.4% 39.4%
 
(a)During 2016, PPL Electric recorded lower income tax expense related to the application of new stock-based compensation accounting guidance. See Note 1 for additional information.
(b)During 2017, PPL Electric recorded a deferred tax benefit related to the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate reduction from 35% to 21% enacted by the TCJA.
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Taxes, other than income 
  
  
 
  
  
State gross receipts (a)$100
 $89
 $102
$102
 $100
 $89
Property and other5
 5
 5
5
 5
 5
Total$105
 $94
 $107
$107
 $105
 $94
 
(a)The decrease in
In 2015, was primarily due to the settlement of a 2011 gross receipts tax audit resultingresulted in the reversal of $17$17 million of previously recognized reserves.

(LKE)
 
The provision for LKE's deferred income taxes for regulated assets and liabilities is based upon the ratemaking principles reflected in rates established by the KPSC, VSCC and the FERC. The difference in the provision for deferred income taxes for regulated assets and liabilities and the amount that otherwise would be recorded under GAAP is deferred and included in "Regulatory assets" or "Regulatory liabilities" on the Balance Sheets.



160


Table of Contents


Significant components of LKE's deferred income tax assets and liabilities were as follows:
2016 20152017 (a) 2016
Deferred Tax Assets      
Federal loss carryforwards$248
 $280
$150
 $248
State loss carryforwards35
 35
41
 35
Tax credit carryforwards186
 181
Federal tax credit carryforwards181
 186
Contributions in aid of construction29
 29
17
 29
Regulatory liabilities60
 66
37
 60
Accrued pension costs58
 53
29
 58
Income taxes due to customers(b)15
 17
305
 15
Deferred investment tax credits51
 50
33
 51
Derivative liability12
 18
7
 12
Other49
 55
26
 49
Valuation allowances(11) (12)(8) (11)
Total deferred tax assets732
 772
818
 732
      
Deferred Tax Liabilities      
Plant - net(b)2,352
 2,105
1,615
 2,352
Regulatory assets102
 119
61
 102
Other13
 11
8
 13
Total deferred tax liabilities2,467
 2,235
1,684
 2,467
Net deferred tax liability$1,735
 $1,463
$866
 $1,735

(a)Deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2017 reflect the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate reduction from 35% to 21% enacted by the TCJA.
(b)The impact on net deferred tax liabilities as a result of the U.S. federal tax rate reduction enacted by the TCJA is primarily related to plant (net of net operating losses) and resulted in a regulatory liability for income taxes due to customers, the deferred tax impact of which is reflected as a deferred tax asset.

At December 31, 2016,2017, LKE had the following loss and tax credit carryforwards, related deferred tax assets, and valuation allowances recorded against the deferred tax assets.
Gross Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Allowance ExpirationGross Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Allowance Expiration
Loss carryforwards(a)              
Federal net operating losses$709
 $248
 $
 2029-2035$713
 $150
 $
 2028-2037
Federal contribution carryforwards11
 4
 
 2020-2021
Federal charitable contributions14
 3
 
 2020-2022
State net operating losses907
 35
 
 2028-2036874
 41
 
 2028-2037
Credit carryforwards            
Federal investment tax credit 133
 
 2025-2036 133
 
 2025-2036
Federal alternative minimum tax credit(b) 27
 
 Indefinite 27
 
 Indefinite
Federal - other 26
 (11) 2017-2036 21
 (8) 2019-2037
State - other 1
 
 Indefinite 1
 
 Indefinite

(a)Due to the enactment of the TCJA, deferred tax assets are reflected at the new U.S. federal corporate income tax rate of 21%.
(b)The TCJA repealed the corporate alternative minimum tax (AMT) for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. The existing indefinite carryforward period for AMT credits was retained.

Changes in deferred tax valuation allowances were: 
Balance at
Beginning
of Period
 Additions Deductions 
Balance
at End
of Period
Balance at
Beginning
of Period
 Additions Deductions 
Balance
at End
of Period
2017$11
 $4
(a)$7
(b)$8
2016$12
 $
 $1
(a)$11
12
 
 1
(b)11
2015
 12
(b)
 12

 12
(c)
 12
20144
 
 4
(c)

(a)Federal tax creditcredits expiring in 2016.2021 that are more likely than not to expire before being utilized.
(b)Federal tax credit expiring.
(c)Federal tax credits expiring in 2016 through 2020 that are more likely than not to expire before being utilized.
(c)Primarily related to the expiration of state capital loss carryforwards.


161


Table of Contents


Details of the components of income tax expense, a reconciliation of federal income taxes derived from statutory tax rates applied to "Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes" to income taxes for reporting purposes, and details of

Table of Contents

"Taxes, "Taxes, other than income" were:
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) 
  
  
 
  
  
Current - Federal$(36) $2
 $(247)$74
 $(36) $2
Current - State1
 1
 8
6
 1
 1
Total Current Expense (Benefit)(35) 3
 (239)80
 (35) 3
Deferred - Federal(a)248
 405
 437
268
 248
 405
Deferred - State38
 32
 23
32
 38
 32
Total Deferred Expense, excluding benefits of operating loss carryforwards286
 437
 460
300
 286
 437
Amortization of investment tax credit - Federal(3) (3) (4)(3) (3) (3)
Tax benefit of operating loss carryforwards 
  
  
 
  
  
Deferred - Federal10
 (198) (8)(2) 10
 (198)
Deferred - State(1) 
 

 (1) 
Total Tax Expense (Benefit) of Operating Loss Carryforwards9
 (198) (8)(2) 9
 (198)
Total income tax expense from continuing operations (a)(b)$257
 $239
 $209
$375
 $257
 $239
          
Total income tax expense - Federal$219
 $206
 $178
$337
 $219
 $206
Total income tax expense - State38
 33
 31
38
 38
 33
Total income tax expense from continuing operations (a)(b)$257
 $239
 $209
$375
 $257
 $239

(a)Excludes current andDue to the enactment of the TCJA in 2017, LKE recorded $112 million of deferred federal and stateincome tax expense, (benefit) recordedof which $108 million related to Discontinued Operationsthe impact of less than $1the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate reduction from 35% to 21% on deferred tax assets and liabilities and $4 million related to valuation allowances on tax credits expiring in 2016, 2015 and 2014. Also, excludes2021.
(b)Excludes deferred federal and state tax expense (benefit) recorded to OCI of $(10) million in 2017, $(16) million in 2016 and less than $(1) million in 2015 and $(36) million in 2014.2015.
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Reconciliation of Income Taxes 
  
  
 
  
  
Federal income tax on Income Before Income Taxes at statutory tax rate - 35%$240
 $211
 $194
$242
 $240
 $211
Increase (decrease) due to: 
  
  
 
  
  
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit25
 22
 20
25
 25
 22
Amortization of investment tax credit(3) (3) (4)(3) (3) (3)
Valuation allowance adjustment (a)
 12
 

 
 12
Stock-based compensation (b)(3) 
 
1
 (3) 
Deferred tax impact of U.S. tax reform (c)112
 
 
Other(2) (3) (1)(2) (2) (3)
Total increase17
 28
 15
133
 17
 28
Total income tax expense$257
 $239
 $209
$375
 $257
 $239
Effective income tax rate37.5% 39.6% 37.8%54.3% 37.5% 39.6%

(a)
Represents a valuation allowance against tax credits expiring through 2020 that are more likely than not to expire before being utilized.
(b)
During 2016, LKE recorded lower income tax expense related to the application of new stock-based compensation accounting guidance. See Note 1 for additional information.
(c)During 2017, LKE recorded deferred income tax expense primarily due to the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate reduction from 35% to 21% enacted by the TCJA.
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Taxes, other than income 
  
  
 
  
  
Property and other$62
 $57
 $52
$65
 $62
 $57
Total$62
 $57
 $52
$65
 $62
 $57

(LG&E)
 
The provision for LG&E's deferred income taxes for regulated assets and liabilities is based upon the ratemaking principles reflected in rates established by the KPSC and the FERC. The difference in the provision for deferred income taxes for regulated assets and liabilities and the amount that otherwise would be recorded under GAAP is deferred and included in "Regulatory assets" or "Regulatory liabilities" on the Balance Sheets.


162


Table of Contents


Significant components of LG&E's deferred income tax assets and liabilities were as follows:
2016 20152017 (a) 2016
Deferred Tax Assets      
Federal loss carryforwards$80
 $76
$29
 $80
Contributions in aid of constructions18
 18
Contributions in aid of construction11
 18
Regulatory liabilities34
 38
21
 34
Deferred investment tax credits14
 13
9
 14
Income taxes due to customers(b)17
 17
142
 17
Derivative liability12
 18
7
 12
Other17
 15
12
 17
Total deferred tax assets192
 195
231
 192
      
Deferred Tax Liabilities      
Plant - net(b)1,058
 914
724
 1,058
Regulatory assets65
 75
40
 65
Accrued pension costs35
 28
34
 35
Other8
 7
5
 8
Total deferred tax liabilities1,166
 1,024
803
 1,166
Net deferred tax liability$974
 $829
$572
 $974

(a)Deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2017 reflect the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate reduction from 35% to 21% enacted by the TCJA.
(b)The impact on net deferred tax liabilities as a result of the U.S. federal tax rate reduction enacted by the TCJA is primarily related to plant (net of net operating losses) and resulted in a regulatory liability for income taxes due to customers, the deferred tax impact of which is reflected as a deferred tax asset.

LG&E expects to have adequate levels of taxable income to realize its recorded deferred income tax assets.

At December 31, 2016,2017, LG&E had $229$140 million of federal net operating loss carryforwards that expire in 2035 $7 million of federal contribution carryforwards that expire from 2020 to 2021 and $5$6 million of federal credit carryforwards that expire from 2034 to 2036.2037.
 
Details of the components of income tax expense, a reconciliation of federal income taxes derived from statutory tax rates applied to "Income Before Income Taxes" to income taxes for reporting purposes, and details of "Taxes, other than income" were:
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) 
  
  
 
  
  
Current - Federal$(22) $(15) $(25)$
 $(22) $(15)
Current - State1
 3
 10
5
 1
 3
Total Current Benefit(21) (12) (15)
Total current Expense (Benefit)5
 (21) (12)
Deferred - Federal134
 190
 114
112
 134
 190
Deferred - State18
 13
 6
14
 18
 13
Total Deferred Expense, excluding benefits of operating loss carryforwards152
 203
 120
126
 152
 203
Amortization of investment tax credit - Federal(1) (1) (2)(1) (1) (1)
Tax benefit of operating loss carryforwards   
  
   
  
Deferred - Federal(4) (76) 
1
 (4) (76)
Total Tax Benefit of Operating Loss Carryforwards(4) (76) 
1
 (4) (76)
Total income tax expense$126
 $114
 $103
$131
 $126
 $114
          
Total income tax expense - Federal$107
 $98
 $87
$112
 $107
 $98
Total income tax expense - State19
 16
 16
19
 19
 16
Total income tax expense$126
 $114
 $103
$131
 $126
 $114


163


Table of Contents


2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Reconciliation of Income Taxes 
  
  
 
  
  
Federal income tax on Income Before Income Taxes at          
statutory tax rate - 35%$115
 $105
 $95
$120
 $115
 $105
Increase (decrease) due to: 
  
  
 
  
  
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit12
 11
 10
13
 12
 11
Amortization of investment tax credit(1) (1) (2)(1) (1) (1)
Other
 (1) 
(1) 
 (1)
Total increase11
 9
 8
11
 11
 9
Total income tax expense$126
 $114
 $103
$131
 $126
 $114
Effective income tax rate38.3% 38.1% 37.9%38.1% 38.3% 38.1%
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Taxes, other than income 
  
  
 
  
  
Property and other$32
 $28
 $25
$33
 $32
 $28
Total$32
 $28
 $25
$33
 $32
 $28
 
(KU)
 
The provision for KU's deferred income taxes for regulated assets and liabilities is based upon the ratemaking principles reflected in rates established by the KPSC, VSCC and the FERC. The difference in the provision for deferred income taxes for regulated assets and liabilities and the amount that otherwise would be recorded under GAAP is deferred and included in "Regulatory assets" or "Regulatory liabilities" on the Balance Sheets.

Significant components of KU's deferred income tax assets and liabilities were as follows:
2016 20152017 (a) 2016
Deferred Tax Assets      
Federal loss carryforwards$79
 $97
$13
 $79
Contributions in aid of construction11
 11
6
 11
Regulatory liabilities26
 28
16
 26
Deferred investment tax credits37
 36
24
 37
Income taxes due to customers (b)163
 
Other11
 7
9
 11
Total deferred tax assets164
 179
231
 164
      
Deferred Tax Liabilities      
Plant - net1,280
 1,175
Plant - net (b)882
 1,280
Regulatory assets37
 44
21
 37
Accrued pension costs12
 4
17
 12
Other5
 2
2
 5
Total deferred tax liabilities1,334
 1,225
922
 1,334
Net deferred tax liability$1,170
 $1,046
$691
 $1,170

(a)Deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2017 reflect the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate reduction from 35% to 21% enacted by the TCJA.
(b)The impact on net deferred tax liabilities as a result of the U.S. federal tax rate reduction enacted by the TCJA is primarily related to plant (net of net operating losses) and resulted in a regulatory liability for income taxes due to customers, the deferred tax impact of which is reflected as a deferred tax asset.

KU expects to have adequate levels of taxable income to realize its recorded deferred income tax assets.
 
At December 31, 2016,2017, KU had $227$61 million of federal net operating loss carryforwards that expire in 2035 and $5$6 million of federal credit carryforwards that expire from 2034 to 2036.2037.
 


164


Table of Contents


Details of the components of income tax expense, a reconciliation of federal income taxes derived from statutory tax rates applied to "Income Before Income Taxes" to income taxes for reporting purposes, and details of "Taxes, other than income" were: 
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) 
  
  
 
  
  
Current - Federal$31
 $(21) $(95)$
 $31
 $(21)
Current - State5
 1
 6
7
 5
 1
Total Current Expense (Benefit)36
 (20) (89)7
 36
 (20)
Deferred - Federal131
 240
 212
138
 131
 240
Deferred - State19
 19
 14
16
 19
 19
Total Deferred Expense, excluding benefits of operating loss carryforwards150
 259
 226
154
 150
 259
Amortization of investment tax credit - Federal(2) (2) (2)(2) (2) (2)
Tax benefit of operating loss carryforwards 
  
  
 
  
  
Deferred - Federal(21) (97) 

 (21) (97)
Total Tax Benefit of Operating Loss Carryforwards(21) (97) 

 (21) (97)
Total income tax expense (a)$163
 $140
 $135
$159
 $163
 $140
          
Total income tax expense - Federal$139
 $120
 $115
$136
 $139
 $120
Total income tax expense - State24
 20
 20
23
 24
 20
Total income tax expense (a)$163
 $140
 $135
$159
 $163
 $140

(a)Excludes deferred federal and state tax expense (benefit) recorded to OCI of less than $1 million in 2017, and less than $(1) million in 2016 2015 and 2014.2015.
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Reconciliation of Income Taxes 
  
  
 
  
  
Federal income tax on Income Before Income Taxes at statutory tax rate - 35%$150
 $131
 $124
$146
 $150
 $131
Increase (decrease) due to: 
  
  
 
  
  
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit16
 13
 13
15
 16
 13
Amortization of investment tax credit(2) (2) (2)(2) (2) (2)
Other(1) (2) 

 (1) (2)
Total increase13
 9
 11
13
 13
 9
Total income tax expense$163
 $140
 $135
$159
 $163
 $140
Effective income tax rate38.1% 37.4% 38.0%38.0% 38.1% 37.4%
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Taxes, other than income 
  
  
 
  
  
Property and other$30
 $29
 $27
$32
 $30
 $29
Total$30
 $29
 $27
$32
 $30
 $29

Unrecognized Tax Benefits (All Registrants)
 
PPL or its subsidiaries file tax returns in four major tax jurisdictions. The income tax provisions for PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU are calculated in accordance with an intercompany tax sharing agreement, which provides that taxable income be calculated as if each domestic subsidiary filed a separate consolidated return. Based on this tax sharing agreement, PPL Electric or its subsidiaries indirectly or directly file tax returns in two major tax jurisdictions, and LKE, LG&E and KU or their subsidiaries indirectly or directly file tax returns in two major tax jurisdictions. With few exceptions, at December 31, 2016,2017, these jurisdictions, as well as the tax years that are no longer subject to examination, were as follows. 
 PPL PPL Electric LKE LG&E KU
U.S. (federal)20122013 and prior 20122013 and prior 20122013 and prior 20122013 and prior 20122013 and prior
Pennsylvania (state)2011 and prior 2011 and prior      
Kentucky (state)20112012 and prior   20112012 and prior 20112012 and prior 20112012 and prior
U.K. (foreign)20132014 and prior        
 


165


Table of Contents


Other (PPL)

In 2015, PPL recorded a tax benefit of $24 million, related to the settlement of the IRS audit for tax years 1998-2011. Of this amount, $12 million is reflected in continuing operations. PPL finalized the settlement of interest in 2016 and recorded an additional $3 million tax benefit.

6. Utility Rate Regulation
 
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
 
(All Registrants)
 
PPL, PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU reflect the effects of regulatory actions in the financial statements for their cost-based rate-regulated utility operations. Regulatory assets and liabilities are classified as current if, upon initial recognition, the entire amount related to thatan item will be recovered or refunded within a year of the balance sheet date.

(PPL)
 
WPD is not subject to accounting for the effects of certain types of regulation as prescribed by GAAP and does not record regulatory assets and liabilities. See Note 1 for additional information.
 
(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
 
LG&E is subject to the jurisdiction of the KPSC and FERC, and KU is subject to the jurisdiction of the KPSC, FERC and VSCC.
 
LG&E's and KU's Kentucky base rates are calculated based on a return on capitalization (common equity, long-term debt and short-term debt) including adjustments for certain net investments and costs recovered separately through other means. As such, LG&E and KU generally earn a return on regulatory assets.
 
As a result of purchase accounting requirements, certain fair value amounts related to contracts that had favorable or unfavorable terms relative to market were recorded on the Balance Sheets with an offsetting regulatory asset or liability. LG&E and KU recover in customer rates the cost of coal contracts, power purchases and emission allowances.purchases. As a result, management believes the regulatory assets and liabilities created to offset the fair value amounts at LKE's acquisition date meet the recognition criteria established by existing accounting guidance and eliminate any rate-making impact of the fair value adjustments. LG&E's and KU's customer rates continue to reflect the original contracted prices for remaining contracts.
 
(PPL, LKE and KU)
 
KU's Virginia base rates are calculated based on a return on rate base (net utility plant plus working capital less deferred taxes and miscellaneous deductions). All regulatory assets and liabilities, except the levelized fuel factor, are excluded from the return on rate base utilized in the calculation of Virginia base rates. Therefore, no return is earned on the related assets.
 
KU's rates to municipal customers for wholesale requirements are calculated based on annual updates to a rate formula that utilizes a return on rate base (net utility plant plus working capital less deferred taxes and miscellaneous deductions). All regulatory assets and liabilities, except regulatory assets recorded for AROs related to certain CCR impoundments, are excluded from the return on rate base utilized in the development of municipal rates. Therefore, no return is earned on the related assets.
 
(PPL and PPL Electric)
 
PPL Electric's distribution base rates are calculated based on recovery of costs as well as a return on distribution rate base (net utility plant plus a working capital allowance less plant-related deferred taxes and other miscellaneous additions and deductions). PPL Electric's transmission revenues are billed in accordance with a FERC tariff that allows for recovery of transmission costs incurred, a return on transmission-related rate base (net utility plant plus a working capital allowance less plant-related deferred taxes and other miscellaneous additions and deductions) and an automatic annual update. See "Transmission Formula Rate" below for additional information on this tariff. All regulatory assets and liabilities are excluded from distribution and transmission return on investment calculations; therefore, generally no return is earned on PPL Electric's regulatory assets.


166


Table of Contents


(All Registrants)
 
The following table provides information about the regulatory assets and liabilities of cost-based rate-regulated utility operations at December 31,:
PPL PPL ElectricPPL PPL Electric
2016 2015 2016 20152017 2016 2017 2016
Current Regulatory Assets:              
Environmental cost recovery$6
 $24
 $
 $
$5
 $6
 $
 $
Generation formula rate11
 7
 
 
6
 11
 
 
Transmission service charge7
 10
 7
 10

 7
 
 7
Gas supply clause4
 3
 
 
Smart meter rider6
 2
 6
 2
15
 6
 15
 6
Storm costs5
 
 5
 

 5
 
 5
Other4
 5
 1
 1
4
 1
 1
 1
Total current regulatory assets (a)$39
 $48
 $19
 $13
$34
 $39
 $16
 $19
              
Noncurrent Regulatory Assets:              
Defined benefit plans$947
 $809
 $549
 $469
$880
 $947
 $504
 $549
Taxes recoverable through future rates340
 326
 340
 326
3
 340
 3
 340
Storm costs57
 93
 9
 30
33
 57
 
 9
Unamortized loss on debt61
 68
 36
 42
54
 61
 29
 36
Interest rate swaps129
 141
 
 
26
 31
 
 
Terminated interest rate swaps92
 98
 
 
Accumulated cost of removal of utility plant159
 137
 159
 137
173
 159
 173
 159
AROs211
 143
 
 
234
 211
 
 
Other14
 16
 1
 2
9
 14
 
 1
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$1,918
 $1,733
 $1,094
 $1,006
$1,504
 $1,918
 $709
 $1,094
Current Regulatory Liabilities:              
Generation supply charge$23
 $41
 $23
 $41
$34
 $23
 $34
 $23
Demand side management3
 8
 
 
Gas supply clause
 6
 
 
Transmission service charge9
 
 9
 
Universal service rider14
 5
 14
 5
26
 14
 26
 14
Transmission formula rate15
 48
 15
 48
9
 15
 9
 15
Fuel adjustment clause11
 14
 
 
Fuel adjustment clauses3
 11
 
 
Act 129 compliance rider17
 
 17
 

 17
 
 17
Storm damage expense13
 16
 13
 16
Storm damage expense rider8
 13
 8
 13
Other5
 7
 1
 3
6
 8
 
 1
Total current regulatory liabilities$101
 $145
 $83
 $113
$95
 $101
 $86
 $83
              
Noncurrent Regulatory Liabilities:              
Accumulated cost of removal of utility plant$700
 $691
 $
 $
$677
 $700
 $
 $
Coal contracts (b)
 17
 
 
Power purchase agreement - OVEC (b)75
 83
 
 
68
 75
 
 
Net deferred tax assets23
 23
 
 
Act 129 compliance rider
 22
 
 22
Net deferred taxes (c)1,853
 23
 668
 
Defined benefit plans23
 24
 
 
27
 23
 
 
Interest rate swaps78
 82
 
 
Terminated interest rate swaps74
 78
 
 
Other
 3
 
 
5
 
 
 
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$899
 $945
 $
 $22
$2,704
 $899
 $668
 $
LKE LG&E KULKE LG&E KU
2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016
Current Regulatory Assets:                      
Environmental cost recovery$6
 $24
 $6
 $13
 $
 $11
$5
 $6
 $5
 $6
 $
 $
Generation formula rate11
 7
 
 
 11
 7
6
 11
 
 
 6
 11
Gas supply clause4
 3
 4
 3
 
 
Other3
 4
 3
 3
 
 1
3
 
 3
 
 
 
Total current regulatory assets$20
 $35
 $9
 $16
 $11
 $19
$18
 $20
 $12
 $9
 $6
 $11


167


Table of Contents


LKE LG&E KULKE LG&E KU
2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016
                      
Noncurrent Regulatory Assets:                      
Defined benefit plans$398
 $340
 $246
 $215
 $152
 $125
$376
 $398
 $234
 $246
 $142
 $152
Storm costs48
 63
 26
 35
 22
 28
33
 48
 18
 26
 15
 22
Unamortized loss on debt25
 26
 16
 17
 9
 9
25
 25
 16
 16
 9
 9
Interest rate swaps129
 141
 88
 98
 41
 43
26
 31
 26
 31
 
 
Terminated interest rate swaps92
 98
 54
 57
 38
 41
AROs211
 143
 70
 57
 141
 86
234
 211
 61
 70
 173
 141
Plant retirement costs4
 6
 
 
 4
 6
Other9
 8
 4
 2
 5
 6
9
 13
 2
 4
 7
 9
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$824
 $727
 $450
 $424
 $374
 $303
$795
 $824
 $411
 $450
 $384
 $374
Current Regulatory Liabilities:                      
Demand side management$3
 $8
 $2
 $4
 $1
 $4
$
 $3
 $
 $2
 $
 $1
Gas supply clause
 6
 
 6
 
 
Fuel adjustment clause11
 14
 2
 2
 9
 12
3
 11
 
 2
 3
 9
Gas line tracker3
 
 3
 
 
 
Other4
 4
 1
 1
 3
 3
3
 4
 
 1
 3
 3
Total current regulatory liabilities$18
 $32
 $5
 $13
 $13
 $19
$9
 $18
 $3
 $5
 $6
 $13
                      
Noncurrent Regulatory Liabilities:                      
Accumulated cost of removal                      
of utility plant$700
 $691
 $305
 $301
 $395
 $390
$677
 $700
 $282
 $305
 $395
 $395
Coal contracts (b)
 17
 
 7
 
 10
Power purchase agreement - OVEC (b)75
 83
 52
 57
 23
 26
68
 75
 47
 52
 21
 23
Net deferred tax assets23
 23
 23
 23
 
 
Net deferred taxes (c)1,185
 23
 552
 23
 633
 
Defined benefit plans23
 24
 
 
 23
 24
27
 23
 
 
 27
 23
Interest rate swaps78
 82
 39
 41
 39
 41
Terminated interest rate swaps74
 78
 37
 39
 37
 39
Other
 3
 
 2
 
 1
5
 
 1
 
 4
 
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$899
 $923
 $419
 $431
 $480
 $492
$2,036
 $899
 $919
 $419
 $1,117
 $480
 
(a)For PPL, these amounts are included in "Other current assets" on the Balance Sheets.
(b)These liabilities wereThis liability was recorded as offsetsan offset to certainan intangible assetsasset that werewas recorded at fair value upon the acquisition of LKE by PPL.
(c)Primarily relates to excess deferred taxes recorded as a result of the TCJA, which lowered the federal corporate income tax rate effective January 1, 2018 requiring deferred tax balances and the associated regulatory liabilities to be remeasured as of December 31, 2017.

Following is an overview of selected regulatory assets and liabilities detailed in the preceding tables. Specific developments with respect to certain of these regulatory assets and liabilities are discussed in "Regulatory Matters."

Defined Benefit Plans

(All Registrants)

Defined benefit plan regulatory assets and liabilities represent the portion of unrecognized transition obligation, prior service cost and net actuarial gains and losses that will be recovered in defined benefit plans expense through future base rates based upon established regulatory practices and, generally, are amortized over the average remaining service lives of plan participants. These regulatory assets and liabilities are adjusted at least annually or whenever the funded status of defined benefit plans is re-measured.remeasured. Of the regulatory asset and liability balances recorded, costs of $58$68 million for PPL, $25$30 million for PPL Electric, $33$38 million for LKE, $22$26 million for LG&E and $11$12 million for KU, are expected to be amortized into net periodic defined benefit costs in 20172018 in accordance with PPL's, PPL Electric's, LKE's, LG&E's and KU's pension accounting policy.

(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)

As a result of the 2014 Kentucky rate case settlement that became effective July 1, 2015, the difference between pension cost calculated in accordance with LG&E's and KU's pension accounting policy and pension cost calculated using a 15-year amortization period for actuarial gains and losses is recorded as a regulatory asset. As of December 31, 2017, the balances were $33 million for PPL and LKE, $18 million for LG&E and $15 million for KU. As of December 31, 2016, the balances were $20 million for PPL and LKE, $11 million for LG&E and $9 million for KU. Of the costs expected to be amortized into net periodic defined benefit costs in 2017, $142018, $16 million for PPL and LKE, $8$10 million for LG&E and $6 million for KU, are expected to be recorded as a regulatory asset in 2017.2018.


168


Table of Contents



(All Registrants)

Storm Costs

PPL Electric, LG&E and KU have the ability to request from the PUC, KPSC and VSCC, as applicable, the authority to treat expenses related to specific extraordinary storms as a regulatory asset and defer such costs for regulatory accounting and reporting purposes. Once such authority is granted, LG&E and KU can request recovery of those expenses in a base rate case and begin amortizing the costs when recovery starts. PPL Electric can recover qualifying expenses caused by major storm events, as defined in its retail tariff, over three years through the Storm Damage Expense Rider commencing in the application year after the storm occurred. PPL Electric's, LG&E's and KU's regulatory assets for storm costs are being amortized through various dates ending in 2020.

Unamortized Loss on Debt

Unamortized loss on reacquired debt represents losses on long-term debt reacquired or redeemed that have been deferred and will be amortized and recovered over either the original life of the extinguished debt or the life of the replacement debt (in the case of refinancing). Such costs are being amortized through 2029 for PPL Electric, through 2042 for KU, and through 2044 for PPL, LKE and LG&E.

Accumulated Cost of Removal of Utility Plant

LG&E and KU charge costs of removal through depreciation expense with an offsetting credit to a regulatory liability. The regulatory liability is relieved as costs are incurred.

PPL Electric does not accrue for costs of removal. When costs of removal are incurred, PPL Electric records the costs as a regulatory asset. Such deferral is included in rates and amortized over the subsequent five-year period.

Regulatory Liability Associated with Net Deferred Taxes

Regulatory liabilities associated with net deferred taxes represent the future revenue impact from the adjustment of deferred income taxes required primarily for excess deferred taxes and unamortized investment tax credits. At December 31, 2017, excess deferred taxes recorded as a result of the TCJA were $2.2 billion at PPL, $1.0 billion at PPL Electric, $1.2 billion at LKE, $532 million at LG&E and $634 million at KU, which include the gross-up associated with the excess deferred taxes.

(PPL and PPL Electric)

Generation Supply Charge (GSC)

The GSC is a cost recovery mechanism that permits PPL Electric to recover costs incurred to provide generation supply to PLR customers who receive basic generation supply service. The recovery includes charges for generation supply (energy and capacity and ancillary services), as well as administration of the acquisition process. In addition, the GSC contains a reconciliation mechanism whereby any over- or under-recovery from prior quarters is refunded to, or recovered from, customers through the adjustment factor determined for the subsequent rate filing period.

Transmission Service Charge (TSC)

PPL Electric is charged by PJM for transmission service-related costs applicable to its PLR customers. PPL Electric passes these costs on to customers, who receive basic generation supply service through the PUC-approved TSC cost recovery mechanism. The TSC contains a reconciliation mechanism whereby any over- or under-recovery from customers is either refunded to, or recovered from, customers through the adjustment factor determined for the subsequent year.

Transmission Formula Rate

PPL Electric's transmission revenues are billed in accordance with a FERC-approved Open Access Transmission Tariff that utilizes a formula-based rate recovery mechanism. Under this formula, rates are put into effect in June of each year based upon prior year actual expenditures and current year forecasted capital additions. Rates are then adjusted the following year to reflect actual annual expenses and capital additions, as reported in PPL Electric's annual FERC Form 1, filed under the FERC's


169


Table of Contents


Uniform System of Accounts. Any difference between the revenue requirement in effect for the prior year and actual expenditures incurred for that year is recorded as a regulatory asset or regulatory liability.

Storm Damage Expense Rider (SDER)

The SDER is a reconcilable automatic adjustment clause under which PPL Electric annually will compare actual storm costs to storm costs allowed in base rates and refund or recover any differences from customers. In the 2015 rate case settlement approved by the PUC in November 2015, it was determined that reportable storm damage expenses to be recovered annually

Table of Contents

through base rates will be set at $15 million. The SDER will recover from or refund to customers, as appropriate, only applicable expenses from reportable storms that are greater than or less than $15 million recovered annually through base rates. Beginning January 1, 2018, the amortized 2011 storm expense of $5 million will be included in the base rate component of the SDER.

Taxes Recoverable through Future Rates

Taxes recoverable through future rates represent the portion of future income taxes that will be recovered through future rates based upon established regulatory practices. Accordingly, this regulatory asset is recognized when the offsetting deferred tax liability is recognized. For general-purpose financial reporting, this regulatory asset and the deferred tax liability are not offset; rather, each is displayed separately. This regulatory asset is expected to be recovered over the period that the underlying book-tax timing differences reverse and the actual cash taxes are incurred.

Act 129 Compliance Rider

In compliance with Pennsylvania's Act 129 of 2008 and implementing regulations, Phase I of PPL Electric's energy efficiency and conservation plan was approved by a PUC order in October 2009. The order allowed PPL Electric to recover the maximum $250 million cost of the program ratably over the life of the plan, from January 1, 2010 through May 31, 2013. Phase II of PPL's energy efficiency and conservation plan allowed PPL Electric to recover the maximum $185 million cost of the program over the three year period June 1, 2013 through May 31, 2016. Phase III of PPL's energy efficiency and conservation plan allows PPL Electric to recover the maximum $313 million over the next five year period, June 1, 2016 through May 31, 2021. The plan includes programs intended to reduce electricity consumption. The recoverable costs include direct and indirect charges, including design and development costs, general and administrative costs and applicable state evaluator costs. The rates are applied to customers who receive distribution service through the Act 129 Compliance Rider. The Phase II program costs were reconciled at the end of the program and any remaining over- or under-recovery was rolled into Phase III. The actual Phase III program costs are reconcilable after each 12 month period, and any over- or under-recovery from customers will be refunded or recovered over the next rate filing period. See below under "Regulatory Matters - Pennsylvania Activities" for additional information on Act 129.

Smart Meter Rider (SMR)

Act 129, alsowhich became effective November 14, 2008, requires installation of smart meters for new construction, uponeach electric distribution company (EDC) with more than 100,000 customers to have a PUC approved Smart Meter Technology Procurement and Installation Plan (SMP). PPL Electric filed its initial SMP in 2009. However, in 2010, the request of consumers and at their cost, or on a depreciation schedule not exceeding 15 years. Under Act 129, EDCs are able to recover the costs of providing smart metering technology. All ofPUC found that PPL Electric's metered customers currently have advanced meters installed at their service locations capable of many of"Advanced Metering Infrastructure" (AMI) system did not fully meet the functions required under Act 129. PPL Electric conducted pilot projects and technical evaluations of its current advanced metering technology and concluded that the current technology does not meet all of the requirementsstandards of Act 129. In June 2014, PPL Electric filed a plan withits current SMP, which was approved by the PUC toin 2015. Under its SMP, PPL Electric will replace its current meters with new meters that meet the Act 129 requirements by the end of 2019. Under Act 129, EDCs are able to recover the costs of providing smart metering technology. PPL Electric uses a mechanism known as the Smart Meter Rider (SMR) to recover the costs to implement its SMP on a full and current basis. The SMR containsis a reconciliation mechanism whereby any over- orover-or under-recovery from prior years is refunded to, or recovered from, customers through the adjustment factor determined for the subsequent quarters.

Universal Service Rider (USR)

The USR provides for recovery of costs associated with universal service programs, OnTrack and Winter Relief Assistance Program (WRAP), provided by PPL Electric to residential customers. OnTrack is a special payment program for low-income households and WRAP provides low-income customers a means to reduce electric bills through energy saving methods. The USR rate is applied to residential customers who receive distribution service. The actual program costs are reconcilable, and any over- or under-recovery from customers will be refunded or recovered annually in the subsequent year.



170


Table of Contents


(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)

Environmental Cost Recovery

Kentucky law permits LG&E and KU to recover the costs, including a return of operating expenses and a return of and on capital invested, of complying with the Clean Air Act and those federal, state or local environmental requirements, which apply to coal combustion wastes and by-products from coal-fired electricity generating facilities. The KPSC requires reviews of the past operations of the environmental surcharge for six-month and two-year billing periods to evaluate the related charges, credits and rates of return, as well as to provide for the roll-in of ECR amounts to base rates each two-year period. As a resultIn December 2017, the KPSC issued orders continuing the use of the 2014 Kentucky rate case settlement that became effective July 1, 2015, LG&E and KU werean authorized to earn a 10% return on equity of 9.7% for all existing approved ECR plans. On August 8, 2016, the KPSC issued an order establishing a 9.8% authorized return

Table of Contents

on equity for the 2016 plan projects that pertain to the handling of coal combustion byproductsplans and MATS.projects. The ECR regulatory asset or liability represents the amount that has been under- or over-recovered due to timing or adjustments to the mechanism and is typically recovered within 12 months.

Fuel Adjustment Clauses

LG&E's and KU's retail electric rates contain a fuel adjustment clause, whereby variances in the cost of fuel to generate electricity, including transportation costs, from the costs embedded in base rates are adjusted in LG&E's and KU's rates. The KPSC requires public hearings at six-month intervals to examine past fuel adjustments and at two-year intervals to review past operations of the fuel adjustment clause and, to the extent appropriate, reestablish the fuel charge included in base rates. The regulatory assets or liabilities represent the amounts that have been under- or over-recovered due to timing or adjustments to the mechanism and are typically recovered within 12 months.

KU also employs a levelized fuel factor mechanism for Virginia customers using an average fuel cost factor based primarily on projected fuel costs. The Virginia levelized fuel factor allows fuel recovery based on projected fuel costs for the coming year plus an adjustment for any under- or over-recovery of fuel expenses from the prior year. The regulatory assets or liabilities represent the amounts that have been under- or over-recovered due to timing or adjustments to the mechanism and are typically recovered within 12 months.

Demand Side Management

LG&E's and KU's DSM programs consist of energy efficiency programs, intended to reduce peak demand and delay investment in additional power plant construction, provide customers with tools and information to become better managers of their energy usage and prepare for potential future legislation governing energy efficiency. LG&E's and KU's rates contain a DSM provision, which includes a rate recovery mechanism that provides for concurrent recovery of DSM costs and incentives, and allows for the recovery of DSM revenues from lost sales associated with the DSM programs. Additionally, LG&E and KU earn an approved return on equity for capital expenditures associated with the residential and commercial load management and demand conservation programs. The cost of DSM programs is assigned only to the class or classes of customers that benefit from the programs.

AROs

As discussed in Note 1, for LKE, LG&E and KU, all ARO accretion and depreciation expenses are reclassified as a regulatory asset. ARO regulatory assets associated with approved ECRcertain CCR projects for CCRs are amortized to expense over a period of 10 to 25 years based on retirement expenditures made related to the obligation.in accordance with regulatory approvals. For other AROs, at the time of retirement, the related ARO regulatory asset is offset against the associated cost of removal regulatory liability, PP&E and ARO liability.

Coal Contracts

As a result of purchase accounting associated with PPL's acquisition of LKE, LG&E's and KU's coal contracts were recorded at fair value on the Balance Sheets with offsets to regulatory assets for those contracts with unfavorable terms relative to current market prices and offsets to regulatory liabilities for those contracts with favorable terms relative to current market prices. These regulatory assets and liabilities were amortized over the same terms as the related contracts, which expired at various times through 2016.

Power Purchase Agreement - OVEC

As a result of purchase accounting associated with PPL's acquisition of LKE, the fair values of the OVEC power purchase agreement were recorded on the balance sheets of LKE, LG&E and KU with offsets to regulatory liabilities. The regulatory liabilities are being amortized using the units-of-production method until March 2026, the expiration date of the agreement at the date of the acquisition. See Notes 1, 13 and 18 for additional discussion of the power purchase agreement.

Regulatory Liability Associated with Net Deferred Tax Assets

LG&E's and KU's regulatory liabilities associated with net deferred tax assets represent the future revenue impact from the reversal of deferred income taxes required primarily for unamortized investment tax credits. These regulatory liabilities are recognized when the offsetting deferred tax assets are recognized.


Table of Contents

Interest Rate Swaps

Periodically, LG&E and KU enter into forward-starting interest rate swaps with PPL that have terms identical to forward-starting swaps entered into by PPL with third parties. Net realized&E's unrealized gains and losses on all of these swaps are probable of recovery through regulated rates;recorded as such, any gains and losses on these derivatives are included in regulatory assets or liabilities and will be recognized in "Interest Expense" on the Statements of Income over the life of the underlying debt at the time the underlying hedged interest expense is recorded. In September 2015, first mortgage bonds totaling $1.05 billion were issued (LG&E issued $550 million and KU issued $500 million) and all outstanding forward-starting interest rate swaps were terminated. Net cash settlements of $88 million were paid on the swaps that were terminated (LG&E and KU each paid $44 million). Net realized losses on these terminated swaps will be recovered through regulated rates. As such, the net settlements were recorded in regulatory assets and are being recognized in "Interest Expense" on the Statements of Income over the life of the new debt that matures in 2025 and 2045. There were no forward starting interest rate swaps outstanding at December 31, 2016. See Note 17 for additional information related to the forward-starting interest rate swaps.

Net cash settlements of $86 million were received on forward starting interest rate swaps that were terminated in 2013 (LG&E and KU each received $43 million). Net realized gains on these terminated swaps will be returned through regulated rates. As such, the net settlements were recorded as regulatory liabilities and are being recognized in "Interest Expense" on the Statements of Income over the life of the associated debt that matures in 2043.

(PPL, LKE and LG&E)

A net cash settlement of $9 million paid on a swap that was terminated by LG&E in December 2016 is included in “Cash Flows from Operating Activities” on the Statements of Cash Flows. The KPSC authorized the recording of a regulatory asset and the recovery of such costs is being sought in the current rate case filed in November 2016.

In addition to the terminated interest rate swaps, realized amounts associated with LG&E's other interest rate swaps, including a swap contract terminated in 2008, are recoverable through rates based on an order from the KPSC. LG&E's unrealized losses and gains are recorded as a regulatory asset or liability until they are realized as interest expense. Interest expense from existing swaps is realized and recovered over the terms of the associated debt, which matures through 2033. Amortization


171


Table of Contents



Terminated Interest Rate Swaps

Net realized gains and losses on all interest rate swaps are probable of recovery through regulated rates; as such, any gains and losses on these derivatives are included in regulatory assets or liabilities and are primarily recognized in "Interest Expense" on the Statements of Income over the life of the loss relatedassociated debt.

A net cash settlement of $9 million was paid on a swap that was terminated by LG&E in December 2016. The KPSC authorized the recording of a regulatory asset and the recovery of such costs. As part of the Stipulation to the 2008 terminated2016 Kentucky rate case that became effective July 1, 2017, the KPSC authorized LG&E to recover the swap contract, whichtermination payment through amortization of the regulatory asset using a straight-line method over 17 years. The amortization of the regulatory asset is expensedrecognized in "Interest Expense" on the Statements of Income.

Plant Outage Costs

The Stipulation to "Other operationthe 2016 Kentucky rate case that became effective July 1, 2017 provided for the normalization of expenses associated with plant outages using an eight-year average. The eight-year average is comprised of four historical years' and maintenance", isfour forecasted years' expenses. Plant outage expenses that are greater or less than the eight-year average will be collected from or returned to be recoveredcustomers, through 2035.future base rates. These amounts are included in other current regulatory assets or other current regulatory liabilities above.

(PPL, LKE and LG&E)

Gas Line Tracker

The GLT authorizes LG&E to recover its incremental operating expenses, depreciation, property taxes and cost of capital, including a return on equity, for capital associated with the five year gas service riser, leak mitigation and customer service line ownership programs. As a result of the 2014 Kentucky rate case settlement, effective July 1, 2015, LG&E is authorized to earn a 10% return on equity for the GLT mechanism. As part of this program, LG&E makes necessary repairs to the gas distribution system and assumes ownership of service lines when replaced. In the 2016 rate case, LG&E has requestedthe KPSC approved additional projects for recovery through the GLT mechanism related to further gas line replacements and transmission pipeline modernizations. Effective July 1, 2017, LG&E is authorized to earn a 9.7% return on equity for the GLT mechanism. As part of the 2016 rate case, LG&E now annually files a combined application which includes revised rates based on projected costs in Octoberand a balancing adjustment calculation with rates effective on the first billing cycle in January.May. After the completion of a plan year, LG&E submits athe balancing adjustment, as part of the combined application filing to the KPSC, to amendamends rates charged for the differences between the actual costs and actual GLT charges for the preceding year. The regulatory assets or liabilities represent the amounts that have been under- or over-recovered due to these cost differences.

Gas Supply Clause

LG&E's natural gas rates contain a gas supply clause, whereby the expected cost of natural gas supply and variances between actual and expected costs from prior periods are adjusted quarterly in LG&E's rates, subject to approval by the KPSC. The gas supply clause also includes a separate natural gas procurement incentive mechanism, which allows LG&E's rates to be adjusted annually to share savings between the actual cost of gas purchases and market indices with the shareholders and the customers during each performance-based rate year (12 months ending October 31). The regulatory assets or liabilities represent the total amounts that have been under- or over-recovered due to timing or adjustments to the mechanisms and are typically recovered within 18 months.

(PPL, LKE and KU)

Generation Formula Rates

KU provides wholesale requirements service to its municipal customers and bills for this service pursuant to a FERC approved generation formula rate. Under this formula, rates are put into effect in July of each year utilizing a return on rate base calculation and actual expenses from the preceding year. The regulatory asset represents the difference between the revenue requirement in effect for the preceding year and actual expenditures incurred for the current year.



172


Table of Contents


Plant Retirement Costs

The 2014 Kentucky rate case settlement that became effective July 1, 2015, provided for deferred recovery of costs associated with Green River's remaining coal-fired generating units through their retirement date, which occurred in September 2015. These costs include inventory write-downs and separation benefits and are being amortized over three years.

Regulatory Matters

(PPL)

U.K. Activities

RIIO-ED1

On April 1, 2015, the RIIO-ED1 eight-year price control period commenced for WPD's four DNOs.

Ofgem Review of Line Loss Calculation

In 2014, Ofgem issued its final decision on the DPCR4 line loss incentives and penalties mechanism. As a result, during 2014 WPD increased its liability by $65 million for over-recovery of line losses with a reduction to "Operating Revenues" on the Statement of Income. Other activity impacting the liability included reductions in the liability that has been included in tariffs and foreign exchange movements. WPD began refunding the liability to customers on April 1, 2015 and will continue through March 31, 2019. The liability at December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $26 million and $61 million.

(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)

Kentucky Activities

Rate Case Proceedings

OnIn November 23, 2016, LG&E and KU filed requests with the KPSC for increases in annual base electricity rates of approximately $103 million at KU and an increase in annual base electricity and gas rates of approximately $94 million and $14 million at LG&E. The proposed base rate increases would result in an electricity rate increase of 6.4% at KU and electricity and gas rate increases of 8.5% and 4.2% at LG&E. New rates are expected to become effective on July 1, 2017.rates. LG&E's and KU's applications includeincluded requests for CPCNs for implementing an Advanced Metering System program and a Distribution Automation program. The applications are based on

In April and May 2017, LG&E and KU, along with all intervening parties to the proceeding, filed with the KPSC, stipulation and recommendation agreements (stipulations) resolving all issues with the parties. Among other things, the proposed stipulations provided for increases in annual revenue requirements associated with LG&E base electricity rates of $59 million, LG&E base gas rates of $8 million and KU base electricity rates of $55 million, reflecting a forecasted test year of July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018 and a requested return on equity of 10.23%9.75%, the withdrawal of LG&E's and KU's request for a CPCN for the Advanced Metering System and other changes to the revenue requirements, which dealt primarily with the timing of cost recovery, including depreciation rates.

In June 2017, the KPSC issued orders approving, with certain modifications, the proposed stipulations filed in April and May 2017. The orders modified the stipulations to provide for increases in annual revenue requirements associated with LG&E base electricity rates of $57 million, LG&E base gas rates of $7 million, KU base electricity rates of $52 million and incorporated an authorized return on equity of 9.7%. A numberConsistent with the stipulations, the orders approved LG&E's and KU's request for implementing a Distribution Automation program and their withdrawal of parties have been granted intervention requestsa request for a CPCN for the Advanced Metering System program. The orders also approved new depreciation rates for LG&E and KU that resulted in higher depreciation of approximately $15 million ($4 million for LG&E and $11 million for KU) in 2017, exclusive of net additions to PP&E. The orders resulted in base electricity and gas rate increases of 5.2% and 2.1% at LG&E and a base electricity rate increase of 3.2% at KU. The new base rates and all elements of the orders became effective July 1, 2017. On June 23, 2017, the KPSC issued orders establishing an authorized return on equity of 9.7% for all of LG&E's and KU's existing approved ECR plans and projects, replacing the prior authorized return on equity levels of 9.8% for CCR projects and 10% for all other ECR approved projects, effective with bills issued in August 2017. The annual impact of the new authorized return for ECR projects is not expected to be significant.

CPCN Filing

On January 10, 2018, LG&E and KU filed an application for a CPCN with the KPSC requesting approval for implementing Advanced Metering Systems across their Kentucky service territories, including gas operations for LG&E. The full deployment is expected to be completed in 2021 with estimated capital costs of $155 million and $104 million for KU and LG&E electric service and $62 million for LG&E gas service. The full Advanced Metering Systems deployment will also result in incremental operation and maintenance costs during the deployment phase of $17 million and $11 million for KU and LG&E electric service and $3 million for LG&E gas service.

TCJA Impact on LG&E and KU Rates

On December 21, 2017, Kentucky Industrial Utility Customers, Inc. submitted a complaint with the KPSC against LG&E and KU, as well as other utility companies in Kentucky, alleging that their respective rates would no longer be fair, just and reasonable following the enactment of the TCJA reducing the federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. The complaint requested the KPSC to issue an order requiring LG&E and KU to begin deferring, as of January 1, 2018, the revenue requirement effect of all income tax expense savings resulting from the federal corporate income tax reduction, including the amortization of excess deferred income taxes by recording those savings in a regulatory liability account and establishing a process by which the federal corporate income tax savings will be passed back to customers.


173


Table of Contents



On December 27, 2017, as a result of the complaint, the KPSC ordered LG&E and KU to satisfy or address the complaint and commence recording regulatory liabilities to reflect the reduction in the proceedings. Data discoveryfederal corporate tax rate to 21% and the filingassociated savings in excess deferred taxes on an interim basis until utility rates are adjusted to reflect the federal tax savings.

On January 8, 2018, LG&E and KU responded to the complaint, denying certain claims in the complaint but concurring that the TCJA will result in savings for their customers. LG&E and KU have stated in their responses that the companies have recorded regulatory liabilities as of written testimonyDecember 31, 2017 to reflect the reduction in the federal corporate tax rate and the associated savings in excess deferred taxes and will continuemake changes to their ECR, DSM and LG&E's GLT rate mechanisms to begin providing the applicable savings to customers. LG&E and KU also offered to establish a new bill credit mechanism effective with the April 2018 billing cycle to begin distributing the tax savings associated with base rates to customers.

On January 29, 2018, LG&E and KU reached a settlement agreement to commence returning savings related to the TCJA to their customers. The savings will be distributed through their ECR, DSM and LG&E's GLT rate mechanisms beginning in March 2018 and through a new bill credit mechanism from April 1, 2018 through April 2017. A public hearing30, 2019. The estimated impact of the rate reduction represents approximately $91 million in KU electricity revenues, $69 million in LG&E electricity revenues and $17 million in LG&E gas revenues for the period January 2018 through April 2019. Ongoing tax savings are expected to also be addressed in LG&E's and KU's next Kentucky base rate case. LG&E and KU have indicated their intent to file an application for base rate changes during 2018 to be effective during spring 2019. The settlement agreement is subject to review and approval by the KPSC. An order in the proceeding may occur during the first quarter of 2018.

Additionally, on January 8, 2018, the VSCC ordered KU, as well as other utilities in Virginia, to accrue regulatory liabilities reflecting the Virginia jurisdictional revenue requirement impacts of the reduced federal corporate tax rate.

The FERC has not issued any guidance on the applications is scheduled to commenceeffect on May 2, 2017. rates of the TCJA.

LG&E and KU cannot predict the outcome of these proceedings.

CPCN and ECR Filings

On August 8, 2016, the KPSC issued an order approving CPCNs and ECR rate treatment regarding environmental construction projects relating to the EPA's regulations addressing the handling of coal combustion by-products and MATS. The construction projects began in 2016 and are expected to continue through 2023. The KPSC order established a 9.8% authorized return on equity for these projects. Recovery of costs commenced with bills rendered on and after August 31, 2016.

(LKE and LG&E)

Gas Franchise

LG&E’s gas franchise agreement for the Louisville/Jefferson County service area expired in March 2016. In August 2016, LG&E and Louisville/Jefferson County entered into a revised franchise agreement with a 5-yearfive-year term (with renewal options). The franchise fee may be modified at Louisville/Jefferson County's election upon 60 days' notice. However, any franchise fee is capped at 3% of gross receipts for natural gas service within the franchise area. The agreement further provides that if the KPSC determines that the franchise fee should be recovered from LG&E's customers, the franchise fee shall revert to zero. In August 2016, LG&E filed an application in a KPSC proceeding to review and rule upon the recoverability of the franchise fee.


Table of Contents

In August 2016, Louisville/Jefferson County submitted a motion to dismiss the proceeding filed by LG&E and, in November 2016, filed an amended complaint against LG&E relating to these issues. LG&E submitted KPSC filings to respond to, request dismissal of and consolidate certain claims or aspects of the proceedings. In January 2017, the KPSC issued an order denying Louisville/Jefferson County's motion to dismiss, consolidating the matter with LG&E's filed application and establishing a procedural schedule for the case. In September 2017, oral arguments were heard by the KPSC and a final order is expected in 2018. Until the KPSC issues a final order in this proceeding, LG&E cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this matter but does not anticipate that it will have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operation. LG&E continues to provide gas service to customers in this franchise area at existing rates, but without collecting or remitting a franchise fee.

(PPL and PPL Electric)

Pennsylvania Activities

Rate Case Proceeding

On March 31, 2015, PPL Electric filed a request with the PUC for an increase in its annual distribution revenue requirement of approximately $168 million. The application was based on a fully projected future test year of January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016. On September 3, 2015, PPL Electric filed with the PUC Administrative Law Judge a petition for approval of a settlement agreement under which PPL Electric would be permitted to increase its annual distribution rates by $124 million, effective January 1, 2016. On November 19, 2015, the PUC entered a final order adopting the Administrative Law Judge's recommended decision. The new rates became effective January 1, 2016.

Act 129

Act 129 requires Pennsylvania Electric Distribution Companies (EDCs) to meet, by specified dates, specified goals for reduction in customer electricity usage and peak demand. EDCs not meeting the requirements of Act 129 are subject to significant penalties. In November 2015, PPL Electric filed with the PUC its Act 129 Phase III Energy Efficiency and Conservation Plan for the period June 1, 2016 through May 31, 2021. In June 2016, the PUC approved PPL Electric's Phase III


174


Table of Contents


Plan, allowing PPL Electric to implement its energy efficiency and demand response programs and recover, through the Act 129 compliance rider, the $313 million cost of the programs over the five-year period June 1, 2016 through May 31, 2021.

Act 129 also requires Default Service Providers (DSP) to provide electricity generation supply service to customers pursuant to a PUC-approved default service procurement plan through auctions, requests for proposal and bilateral contracts at the sole discretion of the DSP. PPL Electric is a DSP. Act 129 requires a mix of spot market purchases, short-term contracts and long-term contracts (4 to 20 years), with long-term contracts limited to 25% of load unless otherwise approved by the PUC. A DSP is able to recover the costs associated with its default service procurement plan.

TCJA Impact on PPL Electric has receivedRates(PPL and PPL Electric)

The PUC approvalissued a Secretarial Letter on February 12, 2018 regarding the TCJA. The Commission is requesting comments from interested parties addressing whether the Commission should adjust current customer rates to reflect the reduced federal income tax expense and, if so, the appropriate negative surcharge or other methodology that would permit immediate adjustment to consumer rates, and whether the surcharge or other said methodology should provide that any refunds to customers due to reduced taxes be effective as of its biannual DSP procurement plans for all prior periods required under Act 129.January 1, 2018. In January 2016,addition, the Secretarial Letter requests certain Pennsylvania regulated utilities, including PPL Electric, filed a Petitionto provide certain data related to the effect of the TCJA on PPL Electric’s income tax expense and rate base including whether any of the potential tax savings from the reduced federal corporate tax rate can be used for Approval of a new DSP procurement plan withpurposes other than to reduce customer rates. PPL Electric’s responses are due to the PUC for the period June 1, 2017 through May 31, 2021. not later than March 9, 2018.

The parties to the proceeding reached a settlement on all but one issue, and a partial settlement agreement and briefsFERC has not issued any guidance on the open issue were submitted to the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) in July 2016. In August 2016, the ALJ issued an initial decision, and certain parties filed exceptions and reply exceptions. In October 2016, the PUC issued an order approving the partial settlement agreement and adopting the initial decision with minor modifications. In November 2016, Retail Electric Supply Association (RESA) filed a Petition for Reconsiderationeffect on rates of the portion of the October 2016 order that approved the Customer Assistance Program Standard Offer Referral Program. In January 2017, the PUC issued an order denying RESA's Petition for Reconsideration and closing the record.TCJA.

Federal Matters

(PPL and PPL Electric)

FERC Formula Rate

In May 2016,April 2017, PPL Electric filed its annual transmission formula rate update with the FERC, reflecting a revised revenue requirement. The filing establishes the revenue requirement used to set rates that took effect in June 2016.2017. The time period for any challenges to PPL Electric’sElectric's annual update expired in October 2016.has expired. No formal challenges were submitted.

Other

Purchase of Receivables Program

(PPL and PPL Electric)
In accordance with a PUC-approved purchase of accounts receivable program, PPL Electric purchases certain accounts receivable from alternative electricity suppliers at a discount, which reflects a provision for uncollectible accounts. The alternative electricity suppliers have no continuing involvement or interest in the purchased accounts receivable. Accounts receivable that are acquired are initially recorded at fair value on the date of acquisition. During 2017, 2016 and 2015, PPL Electric purchased $1.3 billion, $1.4 billion and $1.3 billion of accounts receivable from unaffiliated third parties. During 2015, PPL Electric purchased $146 million of accounts receivable from PPL EnergyPlus. PPL Electric's purchases from PPL EnergyPlus for 2015 included purchases through May 31, 2015, which is the period during which PPL Electric and PPL EnergyPlus were affiliated entities. As a result of the June 1, 2015 spinoff of PPL Energy Supply and creation of Talen Energy, PPL EnergyPlus (renamed Talen Energy Marketing) is no longer an affiliate of PPL Electric. PPL Electric's purchases from Talen Energy Marketing subsequent to May 31, 2015 are included as purchases from unaffiliated third parties.

Table of Contents

7. Financing Activities
 
Credit Arrangements and Short-term Debt
 
(All Registrants)
 
The Registrants maintain credit facilities to enhance liquidity, provide credit support and provide a backstop to commercial paper programs. For reporting purposes, on a consolidated basis, the credit facilities and commercial paper programs of PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU also apply to PPL and the credit facilities and commercial paper programs of LG&E and KU also apply to LKE. The amounts borrowed below are recorded as "Short-term debt" on the Balance Sheets except for


175




borrowings under LG&E's Term Loan Facility which are recorded as "Long-term debt" on the Balance Sheets. The following credit facilities were in place at:
December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Expiration
Date
 Capacity Borrowed 
Letters of
Credit
and
Commercial
Paper
Issued
 Unused Capacity Borrowed 
Letters of
Credit
and
Commercial
Paper
Issued
Expiration
Date
 Capacity Borrowed 
Letters of
Credit
and
Commercial
Paper
Issued
 Unused Capacity Borrowed 
Letters of
Credit
and
Commercial
Paper
Issued
PPL   
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
U.K.   
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
WPD plc   
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
Syndicated Credit Facility (a) (c)Jan. 2021 £210
 £160
 £
 £49
 £133
 £
Jan. 2022 £210
 £148
 £
 £60
 £160
 £
WPD (South West)   
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
Syndicated Credit Facility (a) (c)July 2021 245
 110
 
 135
 
 
July 2021 245
 
 
 245
 110
 
WPD (East Midlands)   
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
Syndicated Credit Facility (a) (c)July 2021 300
 9
 
 291
 
 
July 2021 300
 180
 
 120
 9
 
WPD (West Midlands)   
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
Syndicated Credit Facility (a) (c)July 2021 300
 
 
 300
 
 
July 2021 300
 120
 
 180
 
 
Uncommitted Credit Facilities  90
 60
 4
 26
 
 4
  100
 
 4
 96
 60
 4
Total U.K. Credit Facilities (b)  £1,145
 £339
 £4
 £801
 £133
 £4
  £1,155
 £448
 £4
 £701
 £339
 £4
U.S.   
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
PPL Capital Funding   
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
Syndicated Credit Facility (c) (d)Jan. 2021 $950
 $
 $20
 $930
 $
 $151
Jan. 2022 $950
 $
 $230
 $720
 $
 $20
Syndicated Credit Facility (c) (d)Nov. 2018 300
 
 
 300
 
 300
Nov. 2018 300
 
 
 300
 
 
Bilateral Credit Facility (c) (d)Mar. 2017 150
 
 17
 133
 
 20
Mar. 2018 150
 
 18
 132
 
 17
Total PPL Capital Funding Credit Facilities $1,400
 $
 $37
 $1,363
 $
 $471
 $1,400
 $
 $248
 $1,152
 $
 $37
PPL Electric   
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
Syndicated Credit Facility (c) (d)Jan. 2021 $650
 $
 $296
 $354
 $
 $1
Jan. 2022 $650
 $
 $1
 $649
 $
 $296
LKE   
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
Syndicated Credit Facility (c) (d) (f)Oct. 2018 $75
 $
 $
 $75
 $75
 $
Syndicated Credit Facility (c) (d)Oct. 2018 $75
 $
 $
 $75
 $
 $
LG&E   
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
Syndicated Credit Facility (c) (d)Dec. 2020 $500
 $
 $169
 $331
 $
 $142
Jan. 2022 $500
 $
 $199
 $301
 $
 $169
Term Loan Credit Facility (c) (e)Oct. 2019 200
 100
 
 100
 
 
Total LG&E Credit Facilities $700
 $100
 $199
 $401
 $
 $169
KU   
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
Syndicated Credit Facility (c) (d)Dec. 2020 $400
 $
 $16
 $384
 $
 $48
Jan. 2022 $400
 $
 $45
 $355
 $
 $16
Letter of Credit Facility (c) (d) (e)Oct. 2017 198
 
 198
 
 
 198
Letter of Credit Facility (c) (d) (f)Oct. 2020 198
 
 198
 
 
 198
Total KU Credit Facilities  $598
 $
 $214
 $384
 $
 $246
  $598
 $
 $243
 $355
 $
 $214
 
(a)The facilities contain financial covenants to maintain an interest coverage ratio of not less than 3.0 times consolidated earnings before income taxes, depreciation and amortization and total net debt not in excess of 85% of its RAV, calculated in accordance with the credit facility.
(b)The WPD plc amounts borrowed at December 31, 20162017 and 20152016 included USD-denominated borrowings of $200 million for both periods, which bore interest at 1.43%2.17% and 1.83%1.43%. The unused capacity reflects the amount borrowed in GBP of £161£150 million as of the date borrowed. The WPD (South West) amount borrowed at December 31, 2016 was a GBP-denominated borrowing, which equated to $137 million and bore interest at 0.66%. The WPD (East Midlands) amount borrowed at December 31, 20162017 was a GBP-denominated borrowing, which equated to $11$244 million and bore interest at 0.66%0.89%. The WPD Uncommitted Credit Facilities amounts(West Midlands) amount borrowed at December 31, 2016 were2017 was a GBP-denominated borrowingsborrowing, which equated to $75$162 million and bore interest at 1.26%0.89%. At December 31, 2016,2017, the unused capacity under the U.K. credit facilities was approximately $1 billion.$949 million.
(c)Each company pays customary fees under its respective facility and borrowings generally bear interest at LIBOR-based rates plus an applicable margin.
(d)The facilities contain a financial covenant requiring debt to total capitalization not to exceed 70% for PPL Capital Funding, PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU, as calculated in accordance with the facilities and other customary covenants. Additionally, as it relates to the syndicated and bilateral credit facilities and subject to certain conditions, PPL Capital Funding may request that the capacity of its facilities expiring in November 2018 and March 20172018 be increased by up to $30 million, LG&E and KU each may request up to a $100 million increase in its facility's capacity and LKE may request up to a $25 million increase in its facility's capacity.


be increased by up to $30 million, LG&E and KU each may request up to a $100 million increase in its facility's capacity and LKE may request up to a $25 million increase in its facility's capacity.
(e)LG&E entered into a term loan credit agreement in October 2017 whereby it may borrow up to $200 million. The outstanding borrowings at December 31, 2017 bore interest at a rate of 2.06%.
(f)KU's letter of credit facility agreement allows for certain payments under the letter of credit facility to be converted to loans rather than requiring immediate payment.
(f)At December 31, 2015, LKE's interest rate on outstanding borrowings was 1.68%.



176




In January 2017,2018, LG&E borrowed the remaining $100 million available under its $200 million term loan facility. The proceeds were used to repay short-term debt and for general corporate purposes.

In January 2018, the expiration dates for the PPL Capital Funding, and PPL Electric, syndicated credit facilities expiring in January 2021, and the LG&E and KU syndicated credit facilities expiring in December 2020,January 2022 were extended to January 2022.2023.

PPL, PPL Electric, LG&E and KU maintain commercial paper programs to provide an additional financing source to fund short-term liquidity needs, as necessary. Commercial paper issuances, included in "Short-term debt" on the Balance Sheets, are supported by the respective Registrant's Syndicated Credit Facility. The following commercial paper programs were in place at:

December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Weighted -
Average
Interest Rate
 Capacity Commercial
Paper
Issuances
 Unused
Capacity
 Weighted -
Average
Interest Rate
 Commercial
Paper
Issuances
Weighted -
Average
Interest Rate
 Capacity Commercial
Paper
Issuances
 Unused
Capacity
 Weighted -
Average
Interest Rate
 Commercial
Paper
Issuances
PPL Capital Funding1.10% $1,000
 $20
 $980
 0.78% $451
1.64% $1,000
 $230
 $770
 1.10% $20
PPL Electric1.05% 400
 295
 105
   

 650
 
 650
 1.05% 295
LG&E0.94% 350
 169
 181
 0.71% 142
1.83% 350
 199
 151
 0.94% 169
KU0.87% 350
 16
 334
 0.72% 48
1.97% 350
 45
 305
 0.87% 16
Total  $2,100
 $500
 $1,600
 
 $641
  $2,350
 $474
 $1,876
 
 $500
 
In January 2017, PPL Electric's commercial paper program capacity was increased to $650 million.

(PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and LKE)KU)
 
See Note 14 for discussion of intercompany borrowings.
 
Long-term Debt (All Registrants)
    December 31,    December 31,
Weighted-Average
Rate (g)
 Maturities (g) 2016 2015Weighted-Average
Rate (g)
 Maturities (g) 2017 2016
PPL              
U.S.              
Senior Unsecured Notes3.75% 2018 - 2044 $4,075
 $3,425
3.78% 2020 - 2047 $4,575
 $4,075
Senior Secured Notes/First Mortgage Bonds (a) (b) (c)3.88% 2017 - 2045 6,849
 6,874
3.96% 2018 - 2047 7,314
 6,849
Junior Subordinated Notes6.31% 2067 - 2073 930
 930
5.10% 2067 - 2073 930
 930
Term Loan Credit Facility2.06% 2019 100
 
Total U.S. Long-term Debt    11,854
 11,229
    12,919
 11,854
          
U.K.              
Senior Unsecured Notes (d)5.44% 2017 - 2040 5,707
 7,170
5.24% 2020 - 2040 6,351
 5,707
Index-linked Senior Unsecured Notes (e)1.67% 2026 - 2056 838
 772
1.56% 2026 - 2056 1,012
 838
Total U.K. Long-term Debt (f)    6,545
 7,942
    7,363
 6,545
Total Long-term Debt Before Adjustments    18,399
 19,171
    20,282
 18,399
          
Fair market value adjustments    22
 30
    21
 22
Unamortized premium and (discount), net (e)    20
 (28)    14
 20
Unamortized debt issuance costs    (115) (125)    (122) (115)
Total Long-term Debt    18,326
 19,048
    20,195
 18,326
Less current portion of Long-term Debt    518
 485
    348
 518
Total Long-term Debt, noncurrent    $17,808
 $18,563
    $19,847
 $17,808


177




    December 31,    December 31,
Weighted-Average
Rate (g)
 Maturities (g) 2016 2015Weighted-Average
Rate (g)
 Maturities (g) 2017 2016
          
PPL Electric              
Senior Secured Notes/First Mortgage Bonds (a) (b)4.20% 2017 - 2045 $2,864
 $2,864
4.23% 2020 - 2047 $3,339
 $2,864
Total Long-term Debt Before Adjustments    2,864
 2,864
    3,339
 2,864
          
Unamortized discount    (12) (13)    (16) (12)
Unamortized debt issuance costs    (21) (23)    (25) (21)
Total Long-term Debt    2,831
 2,828
    3,298
 2,831
Less current portion of Long-term Debt    224
 
    
 224
Total Long-term Debt, noncurrent    $2,607
 $2,828
    $3,298
 $2,607
          
LKE              
Senior Unsecured Notes3.97% 2020 - 2021 $725
 $725
3.97% 2020 - 2021 $725
 $725
Term Loan Credit Facility2.06% 2019 100
 
First Mortgage Bonds (a) (c)3.67% 2017 - 2045 3,985
 4,010
3.73% 2018 - 2045 3,975
 3,985
Long-term debt to affiliate3.50% 2025 400
 400
3.50% 2026 400
 400
Total Long-term Debt Before Adjustments    5,110
 5,135
    5,200
 5,110
          
Fair market value adjustments    (1) (1)    
 (1)
Unamortized discount    (15) (16)    (14) (15)
Unamortized debt issuance costs    (29) (30)    (27) (29)
Total Long-term Debt    5,065
 5,088
    5,159
 5,065
Less current portion of Long-term Debt    194
 25
    98
 194
Total Long-term Debt, noncurrent    $4,871
 $5,063
    $5,061
 $4,871
          
LG&E              
Term Loan Credit Facility2.06% 2019 $100
 $
First Mortgage Bonds (a) (c)3.45% 2017 - 2045 $1,634
 $1,659
3.48% 2018 - 2045 1,624
 1,634
Total Long-term Debt Before Adjustments    1,634
 1,659
    1,724
 1,634
          
Fair market value adjustments    (1) (1)    
 (1)
Unamortized discount    (4) (4)    (4) (4)
Unamortized debt issuance costs    (12) (12)    (11) (12)
Total Long-term Debt    1,617
 1,642
    1,709
 1,617
Less current portion of Long-term Debt    194
 25
    98
 194
Total Long-term Debt, noncurrent    $1,423
 $1,617
    $1,611
 $1,423
          
KU              
First Mortgage Bonds (a) (c)3.82% 2019 - 2045 $2,351
 $2,351
3.91% 2019 - 2045 $2,351
 $2,351
Total Long-term Debt Before Adjustments    2,351
 2,351
    2,351
 2,351
          
Unamortized discount    (9) (10)    (9) (9)
Unamortized debt issuance costs    (15) (15)    (14) (15)
Total Long-term Debt    2,327
 2,326
    2,328
 2,327
Less current portion of Long-term Debt    
 
    
 
Total Long-term Debt, noncurrent    $2,327
 $2,326
    $2,328
 $2,327
 
(a)Includes PPL Electric's senior secured and first mortgage bonds that are secured by the lien of PPL Electric's 2001 Mortgage Indenture, which covers substantially all electric distribution plant and certain transmission plant owned by PPL Electric. The carrying value of PPL Electric's property, plant and equipment was approximately $7.6$8.5 billion and $6.7$7.6 billion at December 31, 20162017 and 2015.2016.

Includes LG&E's first mortgage bonds that are secured by the lien of the LG&E 2010 Mortgage Indenture which creates a lien, subject to certain exceptions and exclusions, on substantially all of LG&E's real and tangible personal property located in Kentucky and used or to be used in connection


178




with the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity and the storage and distribution of natural gas. The aggregate carrying value of the property subject to the lien was $4.4$4.7 billion and $4.2$4.4 billion at December 31, 20162017 and 2015.2016.
 


Includes KU's first mortgage bonds that are secured by the lien of the KU 2010 Mortgage Indenture which creates a lien, subject to certain exceptions and exclusions, on substantially all of KU's real and tangible personal property located in Kentucky and used or to be used in connection with the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity. The aggregate carrying value of the property subject to the lien was $5.8$6.0 billion and $5.7$5.8 billion at December 31, 20162017 and 2015.2016.
(b)Includes PPL Electric's series of senior secured bonds that secure its obligations to make payments with respect to each series of Pollution Control Bonds that were issued by the LCIDA and the PEDFA on behalf of PPL Electric. These senior secured bonds were issued in the same principal amount, contain payment and redemption provisions that correspond to and bear the same interest rate as such Pollution Control Bonds. These senior secured bonds were issued under PPL Electric's 2001 Mortgage Indenture and are secured as noted in (a) above. This amount includes $224 million of which PPL Electric is allowed to convert the interest rate mode on the bonds from time to time to a commercial paper rate, daily rate, weekly rate, or term rate of at least one year and $90 million that may be redeemed, in whole or in part, at par beginning in October 2020, and are subject to mandatory redemption upon determination that the interest rate on the bonds would be included in the holders' gross income for federal tax purposes.
(c)Includes LG&E's and KU's series of first mortgage bonds that were issued to the respective trustees of tax-exempt revenue bonds to secure its respective obligations to make payments with respect to each series of bonds. The first mortgage bonds were issued in the same principal amounts, contain payment and redemption provisions that correspond to and bear the same interest rate as such tax-exempt revenue bonds. These first mortgage bonds were issued under the LG&E 2010 Mortgage Indenture and the KU 2010 Mortgage Indenture and are secured as noted in (a) above. The related tax-exempt revenue bonds were issued by various governmental entities, principally counties in Kentucky, on behalf of LG&E and KU. The related revenue bond documents allow LG&E and KU to convert the interest rate mode on the bonds from time to time to a commercial paper rate, daily rate, weekly rate, term rate of at least one year or, in some cases, an auction rate or a LIBOR index rate.

At December 31, 2016,2017, the aggregate tax-exempt revenue bonds issued on behalf of LG&E and KU that were in a term rate mode totaled $514 million for LKE, comprised of $391 million and $123 million for LG&E and KU, respectively.KU. At December 31, 2016,2017, the aggregate tax-exempt revenue bonds issued on behalf of LG&E and KU that were in a variable rate mode totaled $386$375 million for LKE, comprised of $158$147 million and $228 million for LG&E and KU, respectively.
Certain of theKU. These variable rate tax-exempt revenue bonds totaling $375 million at December 31, 2016 ($147 million for LG&E and $228 million for KU), are subject to tender for purchase by LG&E and KU at the option of the holder and to mandatory tender for purchase by LG&E and KU upon the occurrence of certain events.
(d)Includes £225 million ($281304 million at December 31, 2016)2017) of notes that may be redeemed, in total but not in part, on December 21, 2026, at the greater of the principal value or a value determined by reference to the gross redemption yield on a nominated U.K. Government bond.
(e)The principal amount of the notes issued by WPD (South West), WPD (East Midlands) and WPD (East Midlands)(South Wales) is adjusted based on changes in a specified index, as detailed in the terms of the related indentures. The adjustment to the principal amounts from 20152016 to 20162017 was an increase of approximately £10£27 million ($1337 million) resulting from inflation. In addition, this amount includes £225 million ($281304 million at December 31, 2016)2017) of notes issued by WPD (South West) that may be redeemed, in total by series, on December 1, 2026, at the greater of the adjusted principal value and a make-whole value determined by reference to the gross real yield on a nominated U.K. government bond.
(f)Includes £4.4£4.7 billion ($5.56.4 billion at December 31, 2016)2017) of notes that may be put by the holders to the issuer for redemption if the long-term credit ratings assigned to the notes are withdrawn by any of the rating agencies (Moody's or S&P) or reduced to a non-investment grade rating of Ba1 or BB+ or lower in connection with a restructuring event, which includes the loss of, or a material adverse change to, the distribution licenses under which the issuer operates.
(g)The table reflects principal maturities only, based on stated maturities or earlier put dates, and the weighted-average rates as of December 31, 2016.2017.

None of the outstanding debt securities noted above have sinking fund requirements. The aggregate maturities of long-term debt, based on stated maturities or earlier put dates, for the periods 20172018 through 20212022 and thereafter are as follows:
PPL 
PPL
Electric
 LKE LG&E KUPPL 
PPL
Electric
 LKE LG&E KU
2017$518
 $224
 $194
 $194
 $
2018348
 
 98
 98
 
$348
 $
 $98
 $98
 $
2019136
 
 136
 40
 96
430
 
 430
 334
 96
20201,262
 100
 975
 
 500
1,278
 100
 975
 
 500
20211,150
 400
 250
 
 
1,150
 400
 250
 
 
20221,274
 474
 
 
 
Thereafter14,985
 2,140
 3,457
 1,302
 1,755
15,802
 2,365
 3,447
 1,292
 1,755
Total$18,399
 $2,864
 $5,110
 $1,634
 $2,351
$20,282
 $3,339
 $5,200
 $1,724
 $2,351
 
(PPL)

In March 2014, PPL Capital Funding remarketed $9782017, WPD (South Wales) issued £50 million of 4.32% Junior Subordinated Notes due 2019 that were originally issued in April 2011 as a component of PPL's 2011 Equity Units. In connection with the remarketing, PPL Capital Funding retired $228 million of the 4.32% Junior Subordinated Notes due 2019 and issued $350 million of 2.189% Junior Subordinated Notes due 2017 and $400 million of 3.184% Junior Subordinated Notes due 2019. Simultaneously, the newly issued Junior Subordinated Notes were exchanged for $350 million of 3.95% Senior Notes due 2024 and $400 million of 5.00% Senior Notes due 2044. The transaction was accounted for as a debt extinguishment, resulting in a $9 million loss on extinguishment of the Junior Subordinated Notes, recorded to "Interest Expense" on the Statement of Income. Except for the $228 million retirement of the 4.32% Junior Subordinated Notes and fees related to the transactions, the activity was non-cash and excluded from the Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2014. Additionally, in May 2014, PPL issued 31.7 million shares of common stock at $30.86 per share to settle the 2011 Purchase Contracts. PPL received net cash proceeds of $978 million, which were used to repay short-term debt and for general corporate purposes.


In May 2016, PPL Capital Funding issued $650 million of 3.10% Senior Notes due 2026. PPL Capital Funding received proceeds of $645 million, net of a discount and underwriting fees, which will be used to invest in or make loans to subsidiaries of PPL, to repay short-term debt and for general corporate purposes.

In May 2016, WPD (East Midlands) borrowed £100 million at 0.4975% under a new 10-year index linked term loan agreement, which will be used for general corporate purposes.

In May 2016, WPD plc repaid the entire $460 million principal amount of its 3.90% Senior Notes upon maturity.

In October 2016, WPD (East Midlands) issued an additional £40 million of its 2.671%0.01% Index-linked Senior Notes due 2043.2029. WPD (East Midlands)(South Wales) received proceeds of £83£53 million, which equated to $101$64 million at the time of issuance, net of fees and including a premium. The principal amount of the notes is adjusted based on changes in a specified index, as detailed in the terms of the related indentures.indenture. The proceeds will bewere used for general corporate purposes.

In September 2017, PPL Capital Funding issued $500 million of 4.00% Senior Notes due 2047. PPL Capital Funding received proceeds of $490 million, net of a discount and underwriting fees, which were used to repay short-term debt obligations and for general corporate purposes.

In November 2017, WPD (South West) issued £250 million of 2.375% Senior Notes due 2029. WPD (South West) received proceeds of £247 million, which equated to $326 million at the time of issuance, net of fees and a discount. The proceeds were used for general corporate purposes, including the re-financing of existing debt.


179





In December 2017, WPD repaid the entire $100 million principal amount of its 7.25% Senior Notes upon maturity.

(PPL and PPL Electric)

In March 2016,May 2017, PPL Electric issued $475 million of 3.95% First Mortgage Bonds due 2047. PPL Electric received proceeds of $466 million, net of a discount and underwriting fees, which were used to repay short-term debt incurred primarily for capital expenditures.

In August 2017, the LCIDA remarketed $108 million of Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds (PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Project), Series 2016B due 2027 previously issued on behalf of PPL Electric. The bonds were remarketed at a long-term rate and will bear interest at 1.80% through their mandatory purchase date of August 15, 2022.

In September 2017, the LCIDA remarketed $116 million of Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds (PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Project), Series 2016A due 2029 and $108 million of Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2016B due 2027previously issued on behalf of PPL Electric. The bonds were remarketed at a long-term rate and will bear interest at 1.80% through their mandatory purchase date of September 1, 2022.

(PPL, LKE and LG&E)

In April 2017, the Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government of Kentucky remarketed $128 million of Pollution Control Revenue Bonds, 2003 Series A (Louisville Gas and Electric Company Project) due 2033 previously issued on behalf of LG&E. The bonds were remarketed at a long-term rate and will bear interest at 1.50% through their mandatory purchase date of April 1, 2019.

In June 2017, the County of Trimble, Kentucky issued $60 million of Environmental Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds, 2017 Series A (Louisville Gas and Electric Company Project) due 2033 on behalf of LG&E. The bonds were issued bearing interest at an initial terma rate of 0.90%3.75% through their mandatory purchase dates of Septembermaturity and are subject to an optional redemption on or after June 1, 2017 and August 15, 2017. Thereafter, the method of determining the interest rate on the bonds may be converted from time to time at PPL Electric's option.2027. The proceeds of the bonds were used to redeem $116$60 million of 4.70% Pollution ControlEnvironmental Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds, 2005 Series A due 2029 and $108 million of 4.75%% Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds, 2005 Series B due 2027 previously issued by the LCIDA on behalf of PPL Electric.
In connection with the issuance of each of these new series of LCIDA bonds, PPL Electric entered into a loan agreement with the LCIDA pursuant to which the LCIDA has loaned to PPL Electric the proceeds of the LCIDA bonds on payment terms that correspond to the LCIDA bonds. In order to secure its obligations under the loan agreement, PPL Electric issued $224 million of First Mortgage Bonds under its 2001 Mortgage Indenture, which also have payment terms that correspond to the LCIDA bonds.

(PPL, LKE and LG&E)
In September 2016, the County of Trimble, Kentucky issued $125 million of Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds, 20162007 Series A (Louisville Gas and Electric Company Project) due 2044 on behalf of LG&E. The bonds were issued with a floating interest rate that initially will reset weekly. The method of determining the interest rate on the bonds may be converted from time to time at LG&E’s option. The proceeds of the bonds were used to redeem $83 million of Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds, 2000 Series A (Louisville Gas and Electric Company Project) due 2030 and $42 million of Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds, 2002 Series A (Louisville Gas and Electric Company Project) due 20322033 previously issued by the County of Trimble, Kentucky on behalf of LG&E.

In December 2016, LG&E redeemed, at par, its $25 million June 2017, the Louisville/Jefferson County Pollution ControlMetro Government of Kentucky remarketed $31 million of Environmental Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds, 20002007 Series A (Louisville Gas and Electric Company Project) due 2027.

(PPL, LKE and KU)
In August 2016, the County of Carroll, Kentucky2033 previously issued $96 million of Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds, 2016 Series A (Kentucky Utilities Company Project) due 2042 on behalf of KU.LG&E. The bonds were issued bearingremarketed at a long-term rate and will bear interest at an initial term rate of 1.05%1.25% through their mandatory purchase date of September 1,June 3, 2019. Thereafter,

In June 2017, the methodLouisville/Jefferson County Metro Government of determining the interest rate on the bonds may be converted from time to time at KU’s option. The proceeds of the bonds were used to redeem $96Kentucky remarketed $35 million of Pollution ControlEnvironmental Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds, 20022007 Series C (Kentucky UtilitiesB (Louisville Gas and Electric Company Project) due 20322033 previously issued by the County of Carroll, Kentucky on behalf of KU.LG&E. The bonds were remarketed at a long-term rate and will bear interest at 1.25% through their mandatory purchase date of June 3, 2019.

In October 2017, LG&E entered into a $200 million term loan credit facility with a term expiring in October 2019. As of December 31, 2017, LG&E had outstanding borrowings of $100 million under this agreement at a rate of 2.06%. In January 2018, LG&E borrowed the remaining $100 million available under this facility.

In November 2017, LG&E redeemed, at par, its $10 million Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government Environmental Facilities Revenue Bonds, 2001 Series A (Louisville Gas and Electric Company Project) due 2027.

Legal Separateness (All Registrants)
 
The subsidiaries of PPL are separate legal entities. PPL's subsidiaries are not liable for the debts of PPL. Accordingly, creditors of PPL may not satisfy their debts from the assets of PPL's subsidiaries absent a specific contractual undertaking by a subsidiary to pay PPL's creditors or as required by applicable law or regulation. Similarly, PPL is not liable for the debts of its subsidiaries, nor are its subsidiaries liable for the debts of one another. Accordingly, creditors of PPL's subsidiaries may not


satisfy their debts from the assets of PPL or its other subsidiaries absent a specific contractual undertaking by PPL or its other subsidiaries to pay the creditors or as required by applicable law or regulation.
 
Similarly, the subsidiaries of PPL Electric and LKE are each separate legal entities. These subsidiaries are not liable for the debts of PPL Electric and LKE. Accordingly, creditors of PPL Electric and LKE may not satisfy their debts from the assets of


180




their subsidiaries absent a specific contractual undertaking by a subsidiary to pay the creditors or as required by applicable law or regulation. Similarly, PPL Electric and LKE are not liable for the debts of their subsidiaries, nor are their subsidiaries liable for the debts of one another. Accordingly, creditors of these subsidiaries may not satisfy their debts from the assets of PPL Electric and LKE (or their other subsidiaries) absent a specific contractual undertaking by that parent or other subsidiary to pay such creditors or as required by applicable law or regulation.
 
(PPL)
 
ATM Program
 
In February 2015, PPL entered into two separate equity distribution agreements, pursuant to which PPL may sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate of $500 million of its common stock. The compensation paid to the selling agents by PPL may be up to 1% of the gross offering proceeds of the shares sold with respect to each equity distribution agreement. PPL issued the following for the years ended December 31:
2016 20152017 2016 2015
Number of shares (in thousands)710
 1,477
10,373
 710
 1,477
Average share price$35.23
 $33.41
Net Proceeds$25
 $49
$377
 $25
 $49

Distributions and Related Restrictions
 
In November 2016,2017, PPL declared its quarterly common stock dividend, payable January 3, 2017,2, 2018, at 3839.5 cents per share (equivalent to $1.52$1.58 per annum). On February 1, 2017,22, 2018, PPL announced that the company is increasing its common stock dividend to 39.541.0 cents per share on a quarterly basis (equivalent to $1.58$1.64 per annum). Future dividends, declared at the discretion of the Board of Directors, will depend upon future earnings, cash flows, financial and legal requirements and other factors.

See Note 8 for information regarding the June 1, 2015 distribution to PPL's shareowners of a newly formed entity, Holdco, which at closing owned all of the membership interests of PPL Energy Supply and all of the common stock of Talen Energy.
 
Neither PPL Capital Funding nor PPL may declare or pay any cash dividend or distribution on its capital stock during any period in which PPL Capital Funding defers interest payments on its 2007 Series A Junior Subordinated Notes due 2067 or 2013 Series B Junior Subordinated Notes due 2073. At December 31, 2016,2017, no interest payments were deferred.

WPD subsidiaries have financing arrangements that limit their ability to pay dividends. However, PPL does not, at this time, expect that any of such limitations would significantly impact PPL's ability to meet its cash obligations.
 
(All Registrants)
 
PPL relies on dividends or loans from its subsidiaries to fund PPL's dividends to its common shareholders. The net assets of certain PPL subsidiaries are subject to legal restrictions. LKE primarily relies on dividends from its subsidiaries to fund its distributions to PPL. LG&E, KU and PPL Electric are subject to Section 305(a) of the Federal Power Act, which makes it unlawful for a public utility to make or pay a dividend from any funds "properly included in capital account." The meaning of this limitation has never been clarified under the Federal Power Act. LG&E, KU and PPL Electric believe, however, that this statutory restriction, as applied to their circumstances, would not be construed or applied by the FERC to prohibit the payment from retained earnings of dividends that are not excessive and are for lawful and legitimate business purposes. In February 2012, LG&E and KU petitioned the FERC requesting authorization to pay dividends in the future based on retained earnings balances calculated without giving effect to the impact of purchase accounting adjustments for the acquisition of LKE by PPL. In May 2012, the FERC approved the petitions with the further condition that each utility may not pay dividends if such payment would cause its adjusted equity ratio to fall below 30% of total capitalization. Accordingly, at December 31, 2016,2017, net assets of $2.7 billion ($1.1 billion for LG&E and $1.6 billion for KU) were restricted for purposes of paying dividends to LKE, and net assets of $3.1 billion ($1.4 billion for LG&E and $1.7 billion for KU) were available for payment of dividends to LKE. LG&E and KU believe they will not be required to change their current dividend practices as a result of the foregoing requirement. In addition, under Virginia law, KU is prohibited from making loans to affiliates without the prior approval of the


VSCC. There are no comparable statutes under Kentucky law applicable to LG&E and KU, or under Pennsylvania law applicable to PPL Electric. However, orders from the KPSC require LG&E and KU to obtain prior consent or approval before lending amounts to PPL.
 


181




8. Acquisitions, Development and Divestitures
 
(All Registrants)
 
The Registrants from time to time evaluate opportunities for potential acquisitions, divestitures and development projects. Development projects are reexamined based on market conditions and other factors to determine whether to proceed with, modify or terminate the projects. Any resulting transactions may impact future financial results.
 
(PPL)
 
Discontinued Operations
 
Spinoff of PPL Energy Supply
 
In June 2014, PPL and PPL Energy Supply executed definitive agreements with affiliates of Riverstone to spin off PPL Energy Supply and immediately combine it with Riverstone's competitive power generation businesses to form a new, stand-alone, publicly traded company named Talen Energy. The transaction was subject to customary closing conditions, including receipt of regulatory approvals from the NRC, FERC, DOJ and PUC, all of which were received by mid-April 2015. On April 29, 2015, PPL's Board of Directors declared the June 1, 2015 distribution to PPL's shareowners of record on May 20, 2015 of a newly formed entity, Holdco, which at closing owned all of the membership interests of PPL Energy Supply and all of the common stock of Talen Energy.
 
Immediately following the spinoff on June 1, 2015, Holdco merged with a special purpose subsidiary of Talen Energy, with Holdco continuing as the surviving company to the merger and as a wholly owned subsidiary of Talen Energy and the sole owner of PPL Energy Supply. Substantially contemporaneous with the spinoff and merger, RJS Power was contributed by its owners to become a subsidiary of Talen Energy. PPL shareowners received approximately 0.1249 shares of Talen Energy common stock for each share of PPL common stock they owned on May 20, 2015. Following completion of these transactions, PPL shareowners owned 65% of Talen Energy and affiliates of Riverstone owned 35%. The spinoff had no effect on the number of PPL common shares owned by PPL shareowners or the number of shares of PPL common stock outstanding. The transaction is intended to be tax-free to PPL and its shareowners for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
 
PPL has no continuing ownership interest in or control of Talen Energy and Talen Energy Supply (formerly PPL Energy Supply).

Loss on Spinoff
 
In June 2015, in conjunction with the accounting for the spinoff, PPL evaluated whether the fair value of the Supply segment's net assets was less than the carrying value as of the June 1, 2015 spinoff date.
 
PPL considered several valuation methodologies to derive a fair value estimate of its Supply segment at the spinoff date. These methodologies included considering the closing "when-issued" Talen Energy market value on June 1, 2015 (the spinoff date), adjusted for the proportional share of the equity value attributable to the Supply segment, as well as, the valuation methods consistently used in PPL's quantitative goodwill impairment assessments - an income approach using a discounted cash flow analysis of the Supply segment and an alternative market approach considering market multiples of comparable companies.
 
Although the Talen Energy market value approach utilized the most observable inputs of the three approaches, PPL considered certain limitations of the "when-issued" trading market for the spinoff transaction including the short trading duration, lack of liquidity in the market and anticipated initial Talen Energy stock ownership base selling pressure, among other factors, and concluded that these factors limited this input being solely determinative of the fair value of the Supply segment. As such, PPL also considered the other valuation approaches in estimating the overall fair value, but ultimately assigned the highest weighting to the Talen Energy market value approach.
 
The following table summarizes PPL's fair value analysis:


182




Approach Weighting 
Weighted
Fair Value
(in billions)
Talen Energy Market Value 50% $1.4
Income/Discounted Cash Flow 30% 1.1
Alternative Market (Comparable Company) 20% 0.7
Estimated Fair Value   $3.2
 
A key assumption included in the fair value estimate is the application of a control premium of 25% in the two market approaches. PPL concluded it was appropriate to apply a control premium in these approaches as the goodwill impairment testing guidance was followed in determining the estimated fair value of the Supply segment, which had historically been a reporting unit for PPL. This guidance provides that the market price of an individual security (and thus the market capitalization of a reporting unit with publicly traded equity securities) may not be representative of the fair value of the reporting unit. This guidance also indicates that substantial value may arise to a controlling shareholder from the ability to take advantage of synergies and other benefits that arise from control over another entity, and that the market price of a company's individual share of stock does not reflect this additional value to a controlling shareholder. Therefore, the quoted market price need not be the sole measurement basis for determining the fair value, and including a control premium is appropriate in measuring the fair value of a reporting unit.
 
In determining the control premium, PPL reviewed premiums received during the prior five years in market sales transactions obtained from observable independent power producer and hybrid utility transactions greater than $1 billion. Premiums for these transactions ranged from 5% to 42% with a median of approximately 25%. Given these metrics, PPL concluded a control premium of 25% to be reasonable for both of the market valuation approaches used.
 
Assumptions used in the discounted cash flow analysis included forward energy prices, forecasted generation, and forecasted operation and maintenance expenditures that were consistent with assumptions used in the Energy Supply portion of the Talen Energy business planning process at that time and a market participant discount rate.
 
Using these methodologies and weightings, PPL determined the estimated fair value of the Supply segment (classified as Level 3) was below its carrying value of $4.1 billion and recorded a loss on the spinoff of $879 million in the second quarter of 2015, which is reflected in discontinued operations and is nondeductible for tax purposes. This amount served to reduce the basis of the net assets accounted for as a dividend at the June 1, 2015 spinoff date.
 
Costs of Spinoff
 
Following the announcement of the transaction to form Talen Energy, efforts were initiated to identify the appropriate staffing for Talen Energy and for PPL and its subsidiaries following completion of the spinoff. Organizational plans were substantially completed in 2014. The new organizational plans identified the need to resize and restructure the organizations and as a result, in 2014, estimated charges of $36 million for employee separation benefits were recorded related to 306 positions. Of this amount, $16 million related to 112 Energy Supply positions and is reflected in discontinued operations. The remaining $20 million is primarily reflected in "Other operation and maintenance" on the PPL Consolidated Statements of Income.

2014. In 2015, the organizational structures were finalized for both PPL and Talen Energy, which resulted in an additional charge of $10 million for employee separation benefits. Of this amount, $2 million related to Energy Supply positions and is reflected in discontinued operations. The remaining $8 million is reflected in "Other operation and maintenance" on the 2015 PPL Consolidated StatementsStatement of Income. The separation benefits include cash severance compensation, lump sum COBRA reimbursement payments and outplacement services. At December 31, 2015, the recorded liability related to the separation benefits was $13 million, which is included in "Other current liabilities" on the Balance Sheet.

Additional employee-related costs incurred primarily included accelerated stock-based compensation and prorated performance-based cash incentive and stock-based compensation awards, primarily for PPL Energy Supply employees and for PPL Services employees who became PPL Energy Supply employees in connection with the transaction. PPL Energy Supply recognized $24 million of these costs at the spinoff closing date in 2015, which are reflected in discontinued operations.
 
PPL recorded $45 million and $27 million of third-party costs related to this transaction in 2015 and 2014.2015. Of these costs, $32 million and $19 million were primarily for bank advisory, legal and accounting fees to facilitate the transaction, and are reflected in discontinued operations. An additional $13 million and $8 million of consulting and other costs were incurred in 2015, and 2014, related to the formation of the Talen Energy organization and to reconfigure the remaining PPL service functions. These costs are recorded primarily in "Other operation and maintenance" on the Statements2015 Statement of Income.


 
At the close of the transaction in 2015, $72 million ($42 million after-tax) of cash flow hedges, primarily unamortized losses on PPL interest rate swaps recorded in AOCI and designated as cash flow hedges of PPL Energy Supply's future interest payments, were reclassified into earnings and reflected in discontinued operations.
  
As a result

183




Continuing Involvement (PPL and PPL Electric)
 
As a result of the spinoff, PPL and PPL Energy Supply entered into a Transition Services Agreement (TSA) that terminates no later than two years from the spinoff date.terminated on May 31, 2017. The TSA setsset forth the terms and conditions for PPL and Talen Energy to provide certain transition services to one another. PPL is providingprovided Talen Energy certain information technology, financial and accounting, human resource and other specified services. PPL billed Talen Energy $1 million, $35 million and $25 million for these services in 2017, 2016 and 2015. In general, the fees for the transition services allow the provider to recover its cost of the services, including overheads, but without margin or profit.
 
Additionally, prior to the spinoff, through the annual competitive solicitation process, PPL EnergyPlus was awarded supply contracts for a portion of the PLR generation supply for PPL Electric, which were retained by Talen Energy Marketing as part of the spinoff transaction. PPL Electric's supply contracts with Talen Energy Marketing extended through November 2016. Energy purchases from PPL EnergyPlus were previously included in PPL Electric's Statements of Income as "Energy purchases from affiliate" but were eliminated in PPL's Consolidated Statements of Income.
 
Subsequent to the spinoff, PPL Electric's energy purchases from Talen Energy Marketing were $106 million and $27 million for 2016 and 2015. There were no energy purchases from Talen Energy Marketing in 2017. These energy purchases are no longer considered affiliate transactions.

(PPL)

Summarized Results of Discontinued Operations
 
The operations of the Supply segment are included in "Income (Loss)"Loss from Discontinued Operations (net of income taxes)" on the StatementsStatement of Income. Following are the components of Discontinued Operations in the StatementsStatement of Income for the periodsperiod ended December 31:
2015 20142015
Operating revenues$1,427
 $3,848
$1,427
Operating expenses1,328
 3,410
1,328
Other Income (Expense) - net(21) 13
(21)
Interest expense (a)150
 190
150
Gain on sale of Montana Hydro Sale
 237
Income tax expense (benefit)(30) 198
(30)
Loss on spinoff(879) 
(879)
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations (net of income taxes)$(921) $300
Loss from Discontinued Operations (net of income taxes)$(921)
 
(a)
Includes interest associated with the Supply segment with no additional allocation as the Supply segment was sufficiently capitalized.

Net assets, after recognition of the loss on the spinoff, of $3.2 billion were distributed to PPL shareowners in the June 1, 2015, spinoff of PPL Energy Supply.

Montana Hydro Sale
In November 2014, PPL Montana completed the sale to NorthWestern Corporation of 633 MW of hydroelectric generating facilities located in Montana for approximately $900 million in cash. The proceeds from the sale remained with PPL and did not transfer to Talen Energy as a result of the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply. The sale included 11 hydroelectric power facilities and related assets, included in the Supply segment. A gain of $237 million ($137 million after-tax) was recorded on the sale of the hydroelectric power facilities.


As the Montana hydroelectric power facilities were previously reported as a component of PPL Energy Supply and the Supply segment, the components of discontinued operations for these facilities contained in the Statements of Income are included in the disclosure above.
Development
 
Regional Transmission Line Expansion Plan (PPL and PPL Electric)
Susquehanna-Roseland
In 2007, PJM directed the construction of a new 150-mile, 500-kV transmission line between the Susquehanna substation in Pennsylvania and the Roseland substation in New Jersey that it identified as essential to long-term reliability of the Mid-Atlantic electricity grid. PJM determined that the line was needed to prevent potential overloads that could occur on several existing transmission lines in the interconnected PJM system. PJM directed PPL Electric to construct the Pennsylvania portion of the Susquehanna-Roseland line and Public Service Electric & Gas Company to construct the New Jersey portion of the line. The line was energized in May 2015, completing the approximately $648 million project. Costs related to the project are included on the Balance Sheets, primarily in "Regulated utility plant."
 
Northeast/Pocono
 
In October 2012, the FERC issued an order in response to PPL Electric's December 2011 request for ratemaking incentives for the Northeast/Pocono Reliability project (a new 58-mile, 230 kV transmission line that includes three new substations and upgrades to adjacent facilities). The FERC granted the incentive for inclusion in rate base of all prudently incurred construction work in progress costs but denied the requested incentive for a 100 basis point adder to the return on equity.
 
In December 2012, PPL Electric submitted an application to the PUC requesting permission to site and construct the project. In January 2014, the PUC issued a final order approving the application. The line was energized in April 2016, completing the approximately $350 million project, which includes additional substation security enhancements. Costs related to the project are included on the Balance Sheets, primarily in "Regulated utility plant."



184




Capacity Needs (PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)

As a result of environmental requirements and energy efficiency measures, KU anticipates retiring two older coal-fired electricity generating units at the E.W. Brown plant in 2019 with a combined summer rating capacity of 272 MW.

The Cane Run Unit 7 NGCC was put into commercial operation in June 2015. As a result and to meet more stringent EPA regulations, LG&E retired one coal-fired generating unit at the Cane Run plant in March 2015 and retired the remaining two coal-fired generating units at the plant in June 2015. KU retired the two remaining coal-fired generating units at the Green River plant in September 2015. LG&E and KU incurred costs of $11 million and $6 million directly related to these retirements including inventory write-downs and separation benefits. There were no gains or losses on the retirement of these units. See Note 6 for more information related to the regulatory recovery of the costs associated with the retirement of the Green River units.

In December 2014, a final order was issued by the KPSC approving the request to construct a solar generation facility at the E.W. Brown facility. LG&E and KU completed construction activities and placed a 10 MW facility into commercial operation in June 2016 at a cost of $25 million.
 
9. Leases
 
(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
 
PPL and its subsidiaries have entered into various agreements for the lease of office space, vehicles, land, gas storage and other equipment.
 
Rent - Operating Leases
 
Rent expense for the years ended December 31 for operating leases was as follows:


2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
PPL$50
 $49
 $51
$45
 $50
 $49
LKE26
 24
 18
26
 26
 24
LG&E15
 12
 7
15
 15
 12
KU11
 11
 10
11
 11
 11

Total future minimum rental payments for all operating leases are estimated to be:
PPL LKE LG&E KUPPL LKE LG&E KU
2017$31
 $24
 $15
 $9
201826
 22
 14
 8
$32
 $26
 $15
 $10
201916
 13
 7
 6
19
 16
 8
 8
202011
 9
 4
 5
13
 11
 5
 6
20218
 6
 2
 4
10
 8
 3
 5
20228
 6
 2
 4
Thereafter26
 19
 8
 10
22
 15
 6
 8
Total$118
 $93
 $50
 $42
$104
 $82
 $39
 $41
 
10. Stock-Based Compensation
 
(PPL, PPL Electric and LKE)
 
Under the ICP, SIP and the ICPKE (together, the Plans), restricted shares of PPL common stock, restricted stock units, performance units and stock options may be granted to officers and other key employees of PPL, PPL Electric, LKE and other affiliated companies. Awards under the Plans are made by the Compensation, Governance and Nominating Committee (CGNC) of the PPL Board of Directors, in the case of the ICP and SIP, and by the PPL Corporate Leadership Council (CLC), in the case of the ICPKE.

The following table details the award limits under each of the Plans.


185




 Total Plan 
Annual Grant Limit
Total As % of
Outstanding
 Annual Grant 
Annual Grant Limit
For Individual Participants -
Performance Based Awards
 Total Plan 
Annual Grant Limit
Total As % of
Outstanding
 Annual Grant 
Annual Grant Limit
For Individual Participants -
Performance Based Awards
 
Award
Limit
 
PPL Common Stock
On First Day of
 
Limit
Options
 
For awards
denominated in
 
For awards
denominated in
 
Award
Limit
 
PPL Common Stock
On First Day of
 
Limit
Options
 
For awards
denominated in
 
For awards
denominated in
Plan (Shares) Each Calendar Year (Shares) shares (Shares) cash (in dollars) (Shares) Each Calendar Year (Shares) shares (Shares) cash (in dollars)
SIP 10,000,000
   2,000,000
 750,000
 $15,000,000
 15,000,000
   2,000,000
 750,000
 $15,000,000
ICPKE 14,199,796
 2% 3,000,000
  
  
 14,199,796
 2% 3,000,000
  
  
 
Any portion of these awards that has not been granted may be carried over and used in any subsequent year. If any award lapses, is forfeited or the rights of the participant terminate, the shares of PPL common stock underlying such an award are again available for grant. Shares delivered under the Plans may be in the form of authorized and unissued PPL common stock, common stock held in treasury by PPL or PPL common stock purchased on the open market (including private purchases) in accordance with applicable securities laws.
 
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units
  
Restricted shares of PPL common stock are outstanding shares with full voting and dividend rights. Restricted stock awards are granted as a retention award for select key executives and vest when the recipient reaches a certain age or meets service or other criteria set forth in the executive's restricted stock award agreement.
The Plans allow for the grant of restricted stock units. Restricted stock units are awards based on the fair value of PPL common stock on the date of grant. Actual PPL common shares will be issued upon completion of a restriction period, generally three years.

Under the SIP, each restricted stock unit entitles the executive to accrue additional restricted stock units equal to the amount of quarterly dividends paid on PPL stock. These additional restricted stock units are deferred and payable in shares of PPL common stock at the end of the restriction period. Dividend equivalents on restricted stock unit awards granted under the ICP and the ICPKE are currently paid in cash when dividends are declared by PPL.
 


The fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock units granted is recognized on a straight-line basis over the service period or through the date at which the employee reaches retirement eligibility. The fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock units granted to retirement-eligible employees is recognized as compensation expense immediately upon the date of grant. Recipients of restricted stock units granted under the ICPKE may also be granted the right to receive dividend equivalents through the end of the restriction period or until the award is forfeited. Restricted stock and restricted stock units are subject to forfeiture or accelerated payout under the plan provisions for termination, retirement, disability and death of employees. Restrictions lapse on restricted stock and restricted stock units fully, in certain situations, as defined by each of the Plans.
 
The weighted-average grant date fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock units granted was:
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
PPL$33.84
 $34.50
 $31.50
$35.30
 $33.84
 $34.50
PPL Electric34.32
 34.41
 31.81
35.45
 34.32
 34.41
LKE33.73
 34.89
 30.98
35.25
 33.73
 34.89
 
Restricted stock and restricted stock unit activity for 20162017 was:
Restricted
Shares/Units
 
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date Fair
Value Per Share
Restricted
Shares/Units
 
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date Fair
Value Per Share
PPL      
Nonvested, beginning of period1,679,475
 $29.65
1,337,025
 $31.57
Granted536,208
 33.84
538,441
 35.30
Vested(869,932) 29.30
(567,001) 29.28
Forfeited(8,726) 32.59
(16,816) 34.28
Nonvested, end of period (a)1,337,025
 31.57
1,291,649
 34.10
   
PPL Electric   
Nonvested, beginning of period221,085
 $29.48
Transfer between registrants(10,405) 30.98
Granted70,486
 34.32
Vested(73,488) 28.91
Forfeited(3,108) 32.81
Nonvested, end of period204,570
 31.27
   
LKE   
Nonvested, beginning of period318,963
 $29.65
Transfer between registrants(24,993) 30.52
Granted86,987
 33.73
Vested(137,676) 28.76
Nonvested, end of period243,281
 31.53


186




 
Restricted
Shares/Units
 
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date Fair
Value Per Share
    
PPL Electric   
Nonvested, beginning of period204,570
 $31.27
Transfer between registrants(5,250) 32.05
Granted79,321
 35.45
Vested(91,117) 28.83
Forfeited(3,108) 34.68
Nonvested, end of period184,416
 34.20
    
LKE   
Nonvested, beginning of period243,281
 $31.53
Transfer between registrants25,337
 31.61
Granted97,775
 35.25
Vested(125,612) 29.68
Forfeited(9,224) 34.04
Nonvested, end of period231,557
 34.01
 
(a)Excludes 862,337252,850 restricted stock units for which restrictions lapsed for former PPL Energy Supply employees as a result of the spinoff, but for which distribution will not occur until the end of the original restriction period of the awards.

Substantially all restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards are expected to vest.
 
The total fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock units vesting for the years ended December 31 was:
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
PPL$30
 $28
 $11
$20
 $30
 $28
PPL Electric3
 4
 2
3
 3
 4
LKE5
 4
 
4
 5
 4
 


Performance Units - Total Shareowner Return
 
Performance units based on Total Shareowner Return (TSR) are intended to encourage and reward future corporate performance. Performance units represent a target number of shares (Target Award) of PPL's common stock that the recipient would receive upon PPL's attainment of the applicable performance goal. Performance is determined based on total shareowner returnTSR during a three-year performance period. At the end of the period, payout is determined by comparing PPL's performance to the total shareowner returnTSR of the companies included in the Philadelphia Stock Exchange Utility Index. Awards are payable on a graduated basis based on thresholds that measure PPL's performance relative to peers that comprise the applicable index on which each years' awards are measured. Awards can be paid up to 200% of the Target Award or forfeited with no payout if performance is below a minimum established performance threshold. Dividends payable during the performance cycle accumulate and are converted into additional performance units and are payable in shares of PPL common stock upon completion of the performance period based on the determination of the CGNC of whether the performance goals have been achieved. Under the plan provisions, TSR performance units are subject to forfeiture upon termination of employment except for retirement, disabilityone year or death of an employee. For performance units granted prior to 2014, the performance units are eligible for pro-rata vesting at the endmore from commencement of the performance period, for retirement, disability or death of an employee.

Beginning in 2014, theThe fair value of TSR performance units granted to retirement-eligible employees is recognized as compensation expense on a straight-line basis over a one-year period, the minimum vesting period required for an employee to be entitled to payout of the awards with no proration. For employees who are not retirement-eligible, compensation expense is recognized over the shorter of the three-year performance period or the period until the employee is retirement-eligible, with a minimum vesting and recognition period of one-year. If an employee retires before the one-year vesting period, the performance units are forfeited. The fair value of performance units granted in 2013 and prior years was recognized as compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the three-year performance period. Performance units vest on a pro rata basis, in certain situations, as defined by each of the Plans.
 
The fair value of each performance unit granted was estimated using a Monte Carlo pricing model that considers stock beta, a risk-free interest rate, expected stock volatility and expected life. The stock beta was calculated comparing the risk of the individual securities to the average risk of the companies in the index group. The risk-free interest rate reflects the yield on a


187




U.S. Treasury bond commensurate with the expected life of the performance unit. Volatility over the expected term of the performance unit is calculated using daily stock price observations for PPL and all companies in the index group and is evaluated with consideration given to prior periods that may need to be excluded based on events not likely to recur that had impacted PPL and the companies in the index group. PPL uses a mix of historic and implied volatility to value awards.
 
The weighted-average assumptions used in the model were:
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Expected stock volatility19.60% 15.90% 15.80%17.40% 19.60% 15.90%
Expected life3 years
 3 years
 3 years
3 years
 3 years
 3 years
 
The weighted-average grant date fair value of TSR performance units granted was:
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
PPL$35.74
 $36.76
 $34.55
$38.38
 $35.74
 $36.76
PPL Electric35.68
 37.93
 34.43
38.37
 35.68
 37.93
LKE35.28
 37.10
 34.12
38.24
 35.28
 37.10
 
PerformanceTSR performance unit activity for 20162017 was:
 
Performance
Units
 
Weighted-
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
Per Share
PPL   
Nonvested, beginning of period993,540
 $33.09
Granted471,401
 35.74
Vested(375,668) 31.96
Forfeited(18,737) 33.22
Nonvested, end of period (a)1,070,536
 34.65


Performance
Units
 
Weighted-
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
Per Share
TSR Performance Units 
Weighted-
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
Per Share
PPL   
Nonvested, beginning of period1,070,536
 $34.65
Granted293,642
 38.38
Vested(243,983) 32.42
Forfeited(141,964) 32.27
Nonvested, end of period (a)978,231
 36.67
      
PPL Electric      
Nonvested, beginning of period67,671
 $33.05
76,726
 $34.68
Granted35,694
 35.68
26,086
 38.37
Vested(23,880) 31.89
(14,713) 32.14
Forfeited(2,759) 31.74
(12,586) 35.45
Nonvested, end of period76,726
 34.68
75,513
 37.00
      
LKE      
Nonvested, beginning of period193,164
 $32.96
191,601
 $34.34
Transfer between registrants(4,432) 35.07
8,307
 35.96
Granted84,298
 35.28
64,555
 38.24
Vested(70,048) 31.74
(48,980) 32.09
Forfeited(11,381) 33.61
(35,194) 35.25
Nonvested, end of period191,601
 34.34
180,289
 36.69

(a)Excludes 230,196 performance units41,405 TSR awards for which the service vesting requirement was waived for former PPL Energy Supply employees as a result of the spinoff, but for which the ultimate number of shares to be distributed will depend on the actual attainment of the performance goals at the end of the specified performance periods.

The total fair value of TSR performance units vesting for the year ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 and 2014 was $8 million, $12 million $6 million and $5$6 million for PPL and insignificant for PPL Electric and LKE.

Performance Units - Return on Equity

Beginning in 2017, PPL changed its executive compensation mix to add performance units based on achievement of a corporate Return on Equity (ROE). ROE performance units are intended to further align compensation with the company’s strategy and reward for future corporate performance.



188




Payout of these performance units will be based on the calculated average of the annual corporate ROE for each year of the three-year performance period for PPL Corporation. ROE performance units represent a target number of shares (Target Award) of PPL's common stock that the recipient would receive upon PPL's attainment of the applicable ROE performance goal. ROE performance units can be paid up to 200% of the Target Award or forfeited with no payout if performance is below a minimum established performance threshold. Dividends payable during the performance cycle accumulate and are converted into additional performance units and are payable in shares of PPL common stock upon completion of the performance period based on the determination of the CGNC of whether the performance goals have been achieved. Under the plan provisions, these performance units are subject to forfeiture upon termination of employment except for retirement, disability or death of an employee.

The fair value of each ROE performance unit is based on the closing price of PPL Common Stock on the date of grant. The fair value of ROE performance units is recognized on a straight-line basis over the service period or through the date at which the employee reaches retirement eligibility. The fair value awards granted to retirement-eligible employees is recognized as compensation expense immediately upon the date of grant. As these awards are based on performance conditions, the level of attainment is monitored each reporting period and compensation expense is adjusted based on the expected attainment level.

ROE performance unit activity for 2017 was:
 ROE Performance Unit 
Weighted-
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
Per Share
PPL   
Granted97,925
 $34.42
Forfeited(997) 34.41
Nonvested, end of period96,928
 34.42
    
PPL Electric   
Granted8,696
 $34.41
Nonvested, end of period8,696
 34.41
    
LKE   
Granted21,536
 $34.29
Forfeited(997) 34.41
Nonvested, end of period20,539
 34.29

Stock Options
 
PPL's CGNC eliminated the use of stock options and changeddue to changes in its long-term incentive mix to 60% performance units and 40% performance-contingent restricted stock units, resulting in 100% performance-based long-term incentive mix for equity awards granted beginning in January 2014.
 
Under the Plans, stock options had been granted with an option exercise price per share not less than the fair value of PPL's common stock on the date of grant. Options outstanding at December 31, 2016,2017, are fully vested. All options expire no later than ten10 years from the grant date. The options become exercisable immediately in certain situations, as defined by each of the Plans.
 
Stock option activity for 20162017 was:
Number
of Options
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price Per Share
 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (years)
 
Aggregate
Total Intrinsic
Value
Number
of Options
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price Per Share
 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (years)
 
Aggregate
Total Intrinsic
Value
PPL              
Outstanding at beginning of period6,385,149
 $28.54
    4,481,160
 $28.98
    
Exercised(1,903,989) 27.51
    (718,977) 26.67
    
Outstanding and exercisable at end of period4,481,160
 28.98
 4.4 $29
3,762,183
 29.42
 3.5 $14
          
PPL Electric              
Outstanding at beginning of period313,433
 $27.79
    240,939
 $27.48
    
Exercised(72,494) 28.84
    (42,659) 26.99
    
Outstanding and exercisable at end of period240,939
 27.48
 4.5 $2
198,280
 27.58
 3.8 $1
     
LKE       
Outstanding at beginning of period425,656
 $26.08
    
Exercised(363,760) 26.12
    
Outstanding and exercisable at end of period61,896
 25.81
 5.5 $1


189




 
Number
of Options
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price Per Share
 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (years)
 
Aggregate
Total Intrinsic
Value
        
LKE       
Outstanding at beginning of period61,896
 $25.81
    
Exercised(28,164) 26.59
    
Outstanding and exercisable at end of period33,732
 25.15
 4.1 $
For 2017, 2016 2015 and 2014,2015, PPL received $19 million, $52 million $97 million and $67$97 million in cash from stock options exercised. The related income tax benefits realized were not significant.
 
The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised for 2017, 2016 and 2015 and 2014 were $8 million, $18 million $21 million and $13$21 million.
 
Compensation Expense
 
Compensation expense for restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance units and stock options accounted for as equity awards, which for PPL Electric and LKE includes an allocation of PPL Services' expense, was:
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
PPL$27
 $33
 $30
$32
 $27
 $33
PPL Electric16
 14
 12
18
 16
 14
LKE7
 8
 8
8
 7
 8
 
See Note 8 for details of the costs recognized in discontinued operations related to the accelerated vesting of awards for former PPL Energy Supply employees.
 
The income tax benefit related to above compensation expense was as follows:
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
PPL$12
 $14
 $12
$13
 $12
 $14
PPL Electric7
 6
 5
8
 7
 6
LKE3
 3
 3
3
 3
 3
 
At December 31, 2016,2017, unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested restricted stock restricted stock units, and performance unitsawards was:
Unrecognized
Compensation
Expense
 
Weighted-
Average
Period for
Recognition
Unrecognized
Compensation
Expense
 
Weighted-
Average
Period for
Recognition
PPL$8
 1.8$10
 1.7
PPL Electric1
 1.82
 1.7
LKE1
 1.61
 1.6

11. Retirement and Postemployment Benefits
 
(All Registrants)
 
Defined Benefits
 
The majority of the employees of PPL's subsidiaries domestic employeessubsidiaries are eligible for pension benefits under non-contributory defined benefit pension plans with benefits based on length of service and final average pay, as defined by the plans. Effective January 1, 2012, PPL's primary defined benefit pension plan was closed to all newly hired salaried employees. Effective July 1, 2014, PPL's primary defined benefit pension plan was closed to all newly hired bargaining unit employees. Newly hired employees are eligible to participate in the PPL Retirement Savings Plan, a 401(k) savings plan with enhanced employer contributions.



190




The defined benefit pension plans of LKE and its subsidiaries were closed to new salaried and bargaining unit employees hired after December 31, 2005. Employees hired after December 31, 2005 receive additional company contributions above the standard matching contributions to their savings plans.

Effective April 1, 2010, the principal defined benefit pension plan applicable to WPD (South West) and WPD (South Wales) was closed to most new employees, except for those meeting specific grandfathered participation rights. WPD Midlands' defined benefit plan had been closed to new members, except for those meeting specific grandfathered participation rights, prior to acquisition. New employees not eligible to participate in the plans are offered benefits under a defined contribution plan.


PPL and certain of its subsidiaries also provide supplemental retirement benefits to executives and other key management employees through unfunded nonqualified retirement plans.
 
The majority of employees of PPL's domestic subsidiaries are eligible for certain health care and life insurance benefits upon retirement through contributory plans. Effective January 1, 2014, the PPL Postretirement Medical Plan was closed to all newly hired salaried employees. Effective July 1, 2014, the PPL Postretirement Medical Plan was closed to all newly hired bargaining unit employees. Postretirement health benefits may be paid from 401(h) accounts established as part of the PPL Retirement Plan and the LG&E and KU Retirement Plan within the PPL Services Corporation Master Trust, funded VEBA trusts and company funds. WPD does not sponsor any postretirement benefit plans other than pensions.
 
(PPL)
 
The following table provides the components of net periodic defined benefit costs for PPL's domestic (U.S.) and WPD's (U.K.) pension and other postretirement benefit plans for the years ended December 31.
Pension Benefits      Pension Benefits      
U.S. U.K. Other Postretirement BenefitsU.S. U.K. Other Postretirement Benefits
2016 2015 2014 2016 2015 2014 2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
Net periodic defined benefit costs (credits): 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Service cost$66
 $96
 $97
 $69
 $79
 $71
 $7
 $11
 $12
$65
 $66
 $96
 $76
 $69
 $79
 $7
 $7
 $11
Interest cost174
 194
 224
 235
 314
 354
 26
 26
 31
168
 174
 194
 178
 235
 314
 23
 26
 26
Expected return on plan assets(228) (258) (287) (504) (523) (521) (22) (26) (26)(231) (228) (258) (514) (504) (523) (22) (22) (26)
Amortization of: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Prior service cost (credit)8
 7
 20
 
 
 
 
 1
 
10
 8
 7
 
 
 
 (1) 
 1
Actuarial (gain) loss50
 84
 28
 138
 158
 132
 1
 
 1
69
 50
 84
 144
 138
 158
 1
 1
 
Net periodic defined benefit costs
(credits) prior to settlements and termination benefits
70
 123
 82
 (62) 28
 36
 12
 12
 18
81
 70
 123
 (116) (62) 28
 8
 12
 12
Settlements3
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
 3
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Termination benefits
 
 13
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net periodic defined benefit costs
(credits)
$73
 $123
 $95
 $(62) $28
 $36
 $12
 $12
 $18
$83
 $73
 $123
 $(116) $(62) $28
 $8
 $12
 $12
                 
Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations Recognized in OCI and Regulatory Assets/Liabilities - Gross:                 
Divestiture (a)$
 $(353) $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $(6) $
Settlement(3) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net (gain) loss253
 63
 574
 7
 508
 354
 9
 (9) 22
Prior service cost
(credit)
15
 18
 (8) 
 
 
 
 
 7
Amortization of: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Prior service (cost) credit(8) (7) (20) 
 
 
 (1) (1) 
Actuarial gain (loss)(50) (85) (28) (138) (158) (132) (1) 
 (1)
Total recognized in OCI and
regulatory assets/liabilities (b)
207
 (364) 518
 (131) 350
 222
 7
 (16) 28
                 
Total recognized in net periodic
defined benefit costs, OCI and regulatory assets/liabilities (b)
$280
 $(241) $613
 $(193) $378
 $258
 $19
 $(4) $46


191




 Pension Benefits      
 U.S. U.K. Other Postretirement Benefits
 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
                  
Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations Recognized in OCI and Regulatory Assets/Liabilities - Gross:                 
Divestiture (a)$
 $
 $(353) $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $(6)
Settlement(1) (3) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net (gain) loss27
 253
 63
 346
 7
 508
 (28) 9
 (9)
Prior service cost
(credit)
(1) 15
 18
 
 
 
 8
 
 
Amortization of: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Prior service (cost) credit(10) (8) (7) 
 
 
 1
 (1) (1)
Actuarial gain (loss)(69) (50) (85) (144) (138) (158) (1) (1) 
Total recognized in OCI and
regulatory assets/liabilities (b)
(54) 207
 (364) 202
 (131) 350
 (20) 7
 (16)
                  
Total recognized in net periodic
defined benefit costs, OCI and regulatory assets/liabilities (b)
$29
 $280
 $(241) $86
 $(193) $378
 $(12) $19
 $(4)
 
(a)As a result of the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply, amounts in AOCI were allocated to certain former active and inactive employees of PPL Energy Supply and included in the distribution. See Note 8 for additional details.
(b)WPD is not subject to accounting for the effects of certain types of regulation as prescribed by GAAP. As a result, WPD does not record regulatory assets/liabilities.



For PPL's U.S. pension benefits and for other postretirement benefits, the amounts recognized in OCI and regulatory assets/liabilities for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
U.S. Pension Benefits Other Postretirement BenefitsU.S. Pension Benefits Other Postretirement Benefits
2016 2015 2014 2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
OCI$236
 $(269) $319
 $7
 $12
 $7
$(53) $236
 $(269) $(25) $7
 $12
Regulatory assets/liabilities(29) (95) 199
 
 (28) 21
(1) (29) (95) 5
 
 (28)
Total recognized in OCI and
regulatory assets/liabilities
$207
 $(364) $518
 $7
 $(16) $28
$(54) $207
 $(364) $(20) $7
 $(16)
 
The estimated amounts to be amortized from AOCI and regulatory assets/liabilities into net periodic defined benefit costs in 20172018 are as follows:
Pension BenefitsPension Benefits
U.S. U.K.U.S. U.K.
Prior service cost (credit)$9
 $
$10
 $
Actuarial (gain) loss67
 141
86
 152
Total$76
 $141
$96
 $152
      
Amortization from Balance Sheet: 
   
  
AOCI$18
 $141
$28
 $152
Regulatory assets/liabilities58
 
68
 
Total$76
 $141
$96
 $152
 


192




(LKE)
 
The following table provides the components of net periodic defined benefit costs for LKE's pension and other postretirement benefit plans for the years ended December 31.
Pension Benefits Other Postretirement BenefitsPension Benefits Other Postretirement Benefits
2016 2015 2014 2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
Net periodic defined benefit costs (credits): 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Service cost$23
 $26
 $21
 $5
 $5
 $4
$24
 $23
 $26
 $4
 $5
 $5
Interest cost71
 68
 66
 9
 9
 9
68
 71
 68
 9
 9
 9
Expected return on plan assets(91) (88) (82) (6) (6) (4)(92) (91) (88) (7) (6) (6)
Amortization of: 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Prior service cost8
 7
 5
 3
 3
 2
8
 8
 7
 1
 3
 3
Actuarial (gain) loss (a)21
 37
 12
 (1) 
 (1)31
 21
 37
 
 (1) 
Net periodic defined benefit costs(b)$32
 $50
 $22
 $10
 $11
 $10
$39
 $32
 $50
 $7
 $10
 $11
                      
Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations Recognized in OCI and
Regulatory Assets/Liabilities - Gross:
 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Net (gain) loss$119
 $20
 $162
 $6
 $(15) $26
$30
 $119
 $20
 $(14) $6
 $(15)
Prior service cost
 19
 23
 
 
 6
7
 
 19
 8
 
 
Amortization of: 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Prior service credit(8) (7) (5) (3) (3) (2)(8) (8) (7) (1) (3) (3)
Actuarial gain (loss)(21) (37) (12) 1
 
 1
(32) (21) (37) 
 1
 
Total recognized in OCI and
regulatory assets/liabilities
90
 (5) 168
 4
 (18) 31
(3) 90
 (5) (7) 4
 (18)
                      
Total recognized in net periodic
defined benefit costs, OCI and
regulatory assets/liabilities
$122
 $45
 $190
 $14
 $(7) $41
$36
 $122
 $45
 $
 $14
 $(7)
 
(a)As a result of the 2014 Kentucky rate case settlement that became effective July 1, 2015, the difference between actuarial (gain)/loss calculated in accordance with LKE's pension accounting policy and actuarial (gain)/loss calculated using a 15 year amortization period was $11 million in 2017, $6 million in 2016 and $9 million in 2015.


(b)Due to the amount of lump sum payment distributions from the LG&E qualified pension plan, a settlement charge of $5 million was incurred. In accordance with existing regulatory accounting treatment, LG&E has maintained the settlement charge in regulatory assets. The amount will be amortized in accordance with existing regulatory practice.

For LKE's pension and other postretirement benefits, the amounts recognized in OCI and regulatory assets/liabilities for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
Pension Benefits Other Postretirement BenefitsPension Benefits Other Postretirement Benefits
2016 2015 2014 2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
OCI$42
 $4
 $84
 $2
 $(2) $9
$33
 $42
 $4
 $(2) $2
 $(2)
Regulatory assets/liabilities48
 (9) 84
 2
 (16) 22
(36) 48
 (9) (5) 2
 (16)
Total recognized in OCI and
regulatory assets/liabilities
$90
 $(5) $168
 $4
 $(18) $31
$(3) $90
 $(5) $(7) $4
 $(18)
 
The estimated amounts to be amortized from AOCI and regulatory assets/liabilities into net periodic defined benefit costs for LKE in 20172018 are as follows.
Pension
Benefits
 
Other
Postretirement
Benefits
Pension
Benefits
 
Other
Postretirement
Benefits
Prior service cost$8
 $1
$9
 $1
Actuarial Loss30
 
39
 
Total$38
 $1
$48
 $1
      
Amortization from Balance Sheet: 
   
  
AOCI$5
 $
$11
 $
Regulatory assets/liabilities33
 1
37
 1
Total$38
 $1
$48
 $1


193




 
(LG&E)
 
The following table provides the components of net periodic defined benefit costs for LG&E's pension benefit plan for the years ended December 31.
Pension BenefitsPension Benefits
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Net periodic defined benefit costs (credits): 
  
  
 
  
  
Service cost$1
 $1
 $1
$1
 $1
 $1
Interest cost15
 14
 15
13
 15
 14
Expected return on plan assets(21) (20) (19)(22) (21) (20)
Amortization of: 
  
  
 
  
  
Prior service cost4
 3
 2
5
 4
 3
Actuarial loss (a)7
 11
 6
9
 7
 11
Net periodic defined benefit costs(b)$6
 $9
 $5
$6
 $6
 $9
          
Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations
Recognized in Regulatory Assets - Gross:
 
  
  
 
  
  
Net loss$22
 $8
 $14
Net (gain) loss$(9) $22
 $8
Prior service cost
 10
 9
7
 
 10
Amortization of: 
  
  
 
  
  
Prior service credit(4) (3) (2)(5) (4) (3)
Actuarial gain(7) (11) (6)(9) (7) (11)
Total recognized in regulatory assets/liabilities11
 4
 15
(16) 11
 4
          
Total recognized in net periodic defined benefit costs and regulatory assets$17
 $13
 $20
$(10) $17
 $13
 
(a)As a result of the 2014 Kentucky rate case settlement that became effective July 1, 2015, the difference between actuarial (gain)/loss calculated in accordance with LG&E's pension accounting policy and actuarial (gain)/loss calculated using a 15 year amortization period was $7 million in 2017, $5 million in 2016 and $3 million in 2015.


(b)Due to the amount of lump sum payment distributions from the LG&E qualified pension plan, a settlement charge of $5 million was incurred. In accordance with existing regulatory accounting treatment, LG&E has maintained the settlement charge in regulatory assets. The amount will be amortized in accordance with existing regulatory practice.

The estimated amounts to be amortized from regulatory assets into net periodic defined benefit costs for LG&E in 20172018 are as follows.
Pension
Benefits
Pension
Benefits
Prior service cost$4
$5
Actuarial loss9
9
Total$13
$14
 
(All Registrants)
 
The following net periodic defined benefit costs (credits) were charged to operating expense or regulatory assets, excluding amounts charged to construction and other non-expense accounts. The U.K. pension benefits apply to PPL only.
Pension Benefits      Pension Benefits      
U.S. U.K. Other Postretirement BenefitsU.S. U.K. Other Postretirement Benefits
2016 2015 2014 2016 2015 2014 2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
PPL$53
 $71
 $45
 $(95) $(21) $(9) $7
 $8
 $10
$59
 $53
 $71
 $(151) $(95) $(21) $5
 $7
 $8
PPL Electric (a)10
 15
 12
  
  
  
 1
 
 2
12
 10
 15
  
  
  
 
 1
 
LKE (b)24
 37
 17
  
  
  
 6
 8
 7
28
 24
 37
  
  
  
 5
 6
 8
LG&E (b)8
 12
 5
  
  
  
 3
 4
 4
8
 8
 12
  
  
  
 3
 3
 4
KU (a) (b)5
 9
 3
  
  
  
 2
 2
 2
4
 5
 9
  
  
  
 1
 2
 2
 
(a)PPL Electric and KU do not directly sponsor any defined benefit plans. PPL Electric and KU were allocated these costs of defined benefit plans sponsored by PPL Services (for PPL Electric) and by LKE (for KU), based on their participation in those plans, which management believes are reasonable. KU is also allocated costs of defined benefit plans from LKS for defined benefit plans sponsored by LKE. See Note 14 for additional information on costs allocated to KU from LKS.


194




(b)As a result of the 2014 Kentucky rate case settlement that became effective July 1, 2015, the difference between net periodic defined benefit costs calculated in accordance with LKE's, LG&E's and KU's pension accounting policy and the net periodic defined benefit costs calculated using a 15 year amortization period for gains and losses is recorded as a regulatory asset. Of the costs charged to operating expense or regulatory assets, excluding amounts charged to construction and other non-expense accounts, $4 million for LG&E and $2 million for KU were recorded as regulatory assets in 2017, $3 million for LG&E and $2 million for KU were recorded as regulatory assets in 2016 and $4 million for LG&E and $1 million for KU were recorded as regulatory assets in 2015.

In the table above, LG&E amounts include costs for the specific plans it sponsors and the following allocated costs of defined benefit plans sponsored by LKE,LKE. LG&E is also allocated costs of defined benefit plans from LKS for defined benefit plans sponsored by LKE. See Note 14 for additional information on costs allocated to LG&E from LKS. These allocations are based on itsLG&E's participation in those plans, which management believes are reasonable:
 Pension Benefits Other Postretirement Benefits
 2016 2015 2014 2016 2015 2014
LG&E Non-Union Only$4
 $5
 $2
 $3
 $4
 $4
 Pension Benefits Other Postretirement Benefits
 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
LG&E Non-Union Only$5
 $4
 $5
 $3
 $3
 $4

(PPL, LKE and LG&E)
 
PPL, LKE and LG&E adopted the new mortality tables issued by the Society of Actuaries in October 2014 (RP-2014 base tables)tables with collar and factor adjustments, where applicable) for all U.S. defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans. In addition, in 2014, PPL, LKE and LG&E updated the basis for estimating projected mortality improvements and selected the IRS BB-2D two-dimensional improvement scale on a generational basis for all U.S. defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans. TheseIn 2017, PPL, LKE and LG&E updated to the MP-2017 mortality improvement scale from 2006 on a generational basis. This new mortality assumptions reflect the recognition of both improved life expectancies andassumption reflects the expectation of continuinglower ongoing improvements in life expectancies.
 


The following weighted-average assumptions were used in the valuation of the benefit obligations at December 31. The U.K. pension benefits apply to PPL only.
Pension Benefits    Pension Benefits    
U.S. U.K. Other Postretirement BenefitsU.S. U.K. Other Postretirement Benefits
2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016
PPL 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Discount rate4.21% 4.59% 2.87% 3.68% 4.11% 4.48%3.70% 4.21% 2.65% 2.87% 3.64% 4.11%
Rate of compensation increase3.95% 3.93% 3.50% 4.00% 3.92% 3.91%3.78% 3.95% 3.50% 3.50% 3.75% 3.92%
                      
LKE 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Discount rate4.19% 4.56%  
  
 4.12% 4.49%3.69% 4.19%  
  
 3.65% 4.12%
Rate of compensation increase3.50% 3.50%  
  
 3.50% 3.50%3.50% 3.50%  
  
 3.50% 3.50%
                      
LG&E 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Discount rate4.13% 4.49%  
  
  
  
3.65% 4.13%  
  
  
  
 
The following weighted-average assumptions were used to determine the net periodic defined benefit costs for the years ended December 31. The U.K. pension benefits apply to PPL only.
Pension Benefits      Pension Benefits      
U.S. U.K. Other Postretirement BenefitsU.S. U.K. Other Postretirement Benefits
2016 2015 2014 2016 2015 2014 2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
PPL 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Discount rate service cost (b)4.59% 4.25% 5.12% 3.90% 3.85% 4.41% 4.48% 4.09% 4.91%4.21% 4.59% 4.25% 2.99% 3.90% 3.85% 4.11% 4.48% 4.09%
Discount rate interest cost (b)4.59% 4.25% 5.12% 3.14% 3.85% 4.41% 4.48% 4.09% 4.91%4.21% 4.59% 4.25% 2.41% 3.14% 3.85% 4.11% 4.48% 4.09%
Rate of compensation increase3.93% 3.91% 3.97% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 3.91% 3.86% 3.96%3.95% 3.93% 3.91% 3.50% 4.00% 4.00% 3.92% 3.91% 3.86%
Expected return on plan assets (a)7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.20% 7.19% 7.19% 6.11% 6.06% 5.96%7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.22% 7.20% 7.19% 6.21% 6.11% 6.06%
                                  
LKE 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Discount rate4.56% 4.25% 5.18%  
  
  
 4.49% 4.06% 4.91%4.19% 4.56% 4.25%  
  
  
 4.12% 4.49% 4.06%
Rate of compensation increase3.50% 3.50% 4.00%  
  
  
 3.50% 3.50% 4.00%3.50% 3.50% 3.50%  
  
  
 3.50% 3.50% 3.50%
Expected return on plan assets (a)7.00% 7.00% 7.00%  
  
  
 6.82% 6.82% 6.75%7.00% 7.00% 7.00%  
  
  
 6.82% 6.82% 6.82%
                 
LG&E 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Discount rate4.49% 4.20% 5.13%  
  
  
  
  
  
Expected return on plan assets (a)7.00% 7.00% 7.00%  
  
  
  
  
  


195




 Pension Benefits      
 U.S. U.K. Other Postretirement Benefits
 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
                  
LG&E 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Discount rate4.13% 4.49% 4.20%  
  
  
  
  
  
Expected return on plan assets (a)7.00% 7.00% 7.00%  
  
  
  
  
  
 
(a)The expected long-term rates of return for pension and other postretirement benefits are based on management's projections using a best-estimate of expected returns, volatilities and correlations for each asset class. Each plan's specific current and expected asset allocations are also considered in developing a reasonable return assumption.
(b)As of January 1, 2016, WPD began using individual spot rates from the yield curve used to discount the benefit obligation to measure service cost and interest cost. PPL's U.S. plans use a single discount rate derived from an individual bond matching model to measure the benefit obligation, service cost and interest cost. See Note 1 for additional details.

(PPL and LKE)
 
The following table provides the assumed health care cost trend rates for the years ended December 31:
 2016 2015 2014
PPL and LKE     
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year     
– obligations7.0% 6.8% 7.2%
– cost6.8% 7.2% 7.6%
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate)     
– obligations5.0% 5.0% 5.0%
– cost5.0% 5.0% 5.0%
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate     
– obligations2022
 2020
 2020
– cost2020
 2020
 2020


 2017 2016 2015
PPL and LKE     
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year     
– obligations6.6% 7.0% 6.8%
– cost7.0% 6.8% 7.2%
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate)     
– obligations5.0% 5.0% 5.0%
– cost5.0% 5.0% 5.0%
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate     
– obligations2022
 2022
 2020
– cost2022
 2020
 2020

A one percentage point change in the assumed health care costs trend rate assumption would have had the following effects on the other postretirement benefit plans in 2016:2017:
One Percentage PointOne Percentage Point
Increase DecreaseIncrease Decrease
Effect on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation      
PPL$5
 $(5)$4
 $(4)
LKE4
 (4)3
 (3)
 


196




(PPL)
 
The funded status of PPL's plans at December 31 was as follows:
 Pension Benefits    
 U.S. U.K. Other Postretirement Benefits
 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015
Change in Benefit Obligation 
  
  
  
  
  
Benefit Obligation, beginning of period$3,863
 $5,399
 $8,404
 $8,523
 $596
 $716
Service cost66
 96
 69
 79
 7
 11
Interest cost174
 194
 235
 314
 26
 26
Participant contributions
 
 14
 15
 14
 13
Plan amendments14
 19
 
 
 
 
Actuarial (gain) loss214
 (193) 484
 200
 11
 (37)
Divestiture (a)
 (1,416) 
 
 
 (76)
Settlements(9) 
 
 
 
 
Gross benefits paid(243) (236) (357) (391) (64) (58)
Federal subsidy
 
 
 
 1
 1
Currency conversion
 
 (1,466) (336) 
 
Benefit Obligation, end of period4,079
 3,863
 7,383
 8,404
 591
 596
            
Change in Plan Assets 
  
  
  
  
  
Plan assets at fair value, beginning of period3,227
 4,462
 7,625
 7,734
 379
 484
Actual return on plan assets189
 2
 979
 205
 25
 (2)
Employer contributions79
 158
 330
 366
 19
 17
Participant contributions
 
 14
 15
 14
 13
Divestiture (a)
 (1,159) 
 
 
 (80)
Settlements(9) 
 
 
 
 
Gross benefits paid(243) (236) (357) (391) (59) (53)
Currency conversion
 
 (1,380) (304) 
 
Plan assets at fair value, end of period3,243
 3,227
 7,211
 7,625
 378
 379
            
Funded Status, end of period$(836) $(636) $(172) $(779) $(213) $(217)
            
Amounts recognized in the Balance Sheets consist of: 
  
  
  
  
  
Noncurrent asset$
 $
 $10
 $
 $2
 $2
Current liability(17) (10) 
 
 (3) (3)
Noncurrent liability(819) (626) (182) (779) (212) (216)
Net amount recognized, end of period$(836) $(636) $(172) $(779) $(213) $(217)
            
Amounts recognized in AOCI and regulatory assets/liabilities (pre-tax) consist of: 
  
  
  
  
  
Prior service cost (credit)$59
 $53
 $
 $
 $
 $1
Net actuarial (gain) loss1,178
 977
 2,553
 2,684
 45
 37
Total (b)$1,237
 $1,030
 $2,553
 $2,684
 $45
 $38
            
Total accumulated benefit obligation
for defined benefit pension plans
$3,807
 $3,590
 $6,780
 $7,747
  
  

 Pension Benefits    
 U.S. U.K. Other Postretirement Benefits
 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016
Change in Benefit Obligation 
  
  
  
  
  
Benefit Obligation, beginning of period$4,079
 $3,863
 $7,383
 $8,404
 $591
 $596
Service cost65
 66
 76
 69
 7
 7
Interest cost168
 174
 178
 235
 23
 26
Participant contributions
 
 13
 14
 14
 14
Plan amendments(1) 14
 
 
 8
 
Actuarial (gain) loss233
 214
 293
 484
 4
 11
Settlements(6) (9) (1) 
 
 
Termination benefits1
 
 
 
 
 
Gross benefits paid(251) (243) (345) (357) (59) (64)
Federal subsidy
 
 
 
 1
 1
Currency conversion
 
 622
 (1,466) 
 
Benefit Obligation, end of period4,288
 4,079
 8,219
 7,383
 589
 591
            
Change in Plan Assets 
  
  
  
  
  
Plan assets at fair value, beginning of period3,243
 3,227
 7,211
 7,625
 378
 379
Actual return on plan assets437
 189
 480
 979
 54
 25
Employer contributions65
 79
 486
 330
 15
 19
Participant contributions
 
 13
 14
 13
 14
Settlements(6) (9) (1) 
 
 
Gross benefits paid(251) (243) (345) (357) (55) (59)
Currency conversion
 
 646
 (1,380) 
 
Plan assets at fair value, end of period3,488
 3,243
 8,490
 7,211
 405
 378
            
Funded Status, end of period$(800) $(836) $271
 $(172) $(184) $(213)
            
Amounts recognized in the Balance Sheets consist of: 
  
  
  
  
  
Noncurrent asset$
 $
 $284
 $10
 $2
 $2
Current liability(13) (17) 
 
 (3) (3)
Noncurrent liability(787) (819) (13) (182) (183) (212)
Net amount recognized, end of period$(800) $(836) $271
 $(172) $(184) $(213)
            
Amounts recognized in AOCI and regulatory assets/liabilities (pre-tax) consist of: 
  
  
  
  
  
Prior service cost (credit)$49
 $59
 $
 $
 $9
 $
Net actuarial (gain) loss1,134
 1,178
 2,755
 2,553
 16
 45
Total (a)$1,183
 $1,237
 $2,755
 $2,553
 $25
 $45
            
Total accumulated benefit obligation
for defined benefit pension plans
$4,000
 $3,807
 $7,542
 $6,780
  
  

(a)As a result of the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply, obligations and assets attributable to certain former active and inactive employees of PPL Energy Supply were transferred to Talen Energy plans.
(b)WPD is not subject to accounting for the effects of certain types of regulation as prescribed by GAAP and as a result, does not record regulatory assets/liabilities.

For PPL's U.S. pension and other postretirement benefit plans, the amounts recognized in AOCI and regulatory assets/liabilities at December 31 were as follows:
U.S. Pension Benefits Other Postretirement BenefitsU.S. Pension Benefits Other Postretirement Benefits
2016 2015 2016 20152017 2016 2017 2016
AOCI$357
 $275
 $20
 $18
$374
 $357
 $15
 $20
Regulatory assets/liabilities880
 755
 25
 20
809
 880
 10
 25
Total$1,237
 $1,030
 $45
 $38
$1,183
 $1,237
 $25
 $45


197




 
The following tables provide information on pension plans where the projected benefit obligation (PBO) or accumulated benefit obligation (ABO) exceed the fair value of plan assets:
U.S. U.K.U.S. U.K.
PBO in excess of plan assets PBO in excess of plan assetsPBO in excess of plan assets PBO in excess of plan assets
2016 2015 2016 20152017 2016 2017 2016
Projected benefit obligation$4,079
 $3,863
 $3,403
 $8,404
$4,288
 $4,079
 $3,083
 $3,403
Fair value of plan assets3,243
 3,227
 3,221
 7,625
3,488
 3,243
 3,070
 3,221
              
U.S. U.K.U.S. U.K.
ABO in excess of plan assets ABO in excess of plan assetsABO in excess of plan assets ABO in excess of plan assets
2016 2015 2016 20152017 2016 2017 2016
Accumulated benefit obligation$3,807
 $3,590
 $657
 $3,532
$4,000
 $3,807
 $10
 $657
Fair value of plan assets3,243
 3,227
 643
 3,287
3,488
 3,243
 
 643
 
(LKE)

The funded status of LKE's plans at December 31 was as follows:
 Pension Benefits Other Postretirement Benefits
 2016 2015 2016 2015
Change in Benefit Obligation 
  
  
  
Benefit Obligation, beginning of period$1,588
 $1,608
 $216
 $234
Service cost23
 26
 5
 5
Interest cost71
 68
 9
 9
Participant contributions
 
 7
 7
Plan amendments (a)
 19
 
 
Actuarial (gain) loss96
 (74) 4
 (22)
Gross benefits paid (a)(109) (59) (21) (18)
Federal subsidy
 
 
 1
Benefit Obligation, end of period1,669
 1,588
 220
 216
        
Change in Plan Assets 
  
  
  
Plan assets at fair value, beginning of period1,289
 1,301
 88
 82
Actual return on plan assets69
 (7) 4
 
Employer contributions66
 54
 20
 17
Participant contributions
 
 7
 7
Gross benefits paid(109) (59) (21) (18)
Plan assets at fair value, end of period1,315
 1,289
 98
 88
        
Funded Status, end of period$(354) $(299) $(122) $(128)


Pension Benefits Other Postretirement BenefitsPension Benefits Other Postretirement Benefits
2016 2015 2016 20152017 2016 2017 2016
Change in Benefit Obligation 
  
  
  
Benefit Obligation, beginning of period$1,669
 $1,588
 $220
 $216
Service cost24
 23
 4
 5
Interest cost68
 71
 9
 9
Participant contributions
 
 8
 7
Plan amendments (a)6
 
 8
 
Actuarial (gain) loss113
 96
 (7) 4
Gross benefits paid (a)(109) (109) (19) (21)
Benefit Obligation, end of period1,771
 1,669
 223
 220
       
Change in Plan Assets 
  
  
  
Plan assets at fair value, beginning of period1,315
 1,289
 98
 88
Actual return on plan assets175
 69
 14
 4
Employer contributions21
 66
 15
 20
Participant contributions
 
 8
 7
Gross benefits paid(109) (109) (19) (21)
Plan assets at fair value, end of period1,402
 1,315
 116
 98
       
Funded Status, end of period$(369) $(354) $(107) $(122)
              
Amounts recognized in the Balance Sheets consist of: 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
Noncurrent asset$
 $
 $2
 $2
$
 $
 $2
 $2
Current liability(4) (3) (3) (3)(4) (4) (3) (3)
Noncurrent liability(350) (296) (121) (127)(365) (350) (106) (121)
Net amount recognized, end of period$(354) $(299) $(122) $(128)$(369) $(354) $(107) $(122)
              
Amounts recognized in AOCI and regulatory assets/liabilities (pre-tax) consist of: 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
Prior service cost$45
 $54
 $6
 $9
$44
 $45
 $13
 $6
Net actuarial (gain) loss436
 338
 (13) (19)434
 436
 (26) (13)
Total$481
 $392
 $(7) $(10)$478
 $481
 $(13) $(7)
              
Total accumulated benefit obligation
for defined benefit pension plans
$1,531
 $1,452
  
  
$1,616
 $1,531
  
  
 
(a)The pension plans were amended in December 2015 to allow active participants and terminated vested participants who had not previously elected a form of payment of their benefit to elect to receive their accrued pension benefit as a one-time lump-sum payment effective January 1, 2016. The projected benefit obligation at December 31, 2015 increased by $19 million as a result of the amendment. Gross benefits paid by the plans include $53 million of lump-sum cash payments made to participants during 2016 in connection with these offerings.


198




benefit obligation at December 31, 2016 increased by $19 million as a result of the amendment. Gross benefits paid by the plans include lump-sum cash payments made to participants during 2017 and 2016 of $50 million and $53 million in connection with these offerings.

The amounts recognized in AOCI and regulatory assets/liabilities at December 31 were as follows:
Pension Benefits Other Postretirement BenefitsPension Benefits Other Postretirement Benefits
2016 2015 2016 20152017 2016 2017 2016
AOCI$111
 $70
 $8
 $7
$144
 $111
 $6
 $8
Regulatory assets/liabilities370
 322
 (15) (17)334
 370
 (19) (15)
Total$481
 $392
 $(7) $(10)$478
 $481
 $(13) $(7)

The following tables provide information on pension plans where the projected benefit obligation (PBO) or accumulated benefit obligations (ABO) exceed the fair value of plan assets: 
PBO in excess of plan assetsPBO in excess of plan assets
2016 20152017 2016
Projected benefit obligation$1,669
 $1,588
$1,771
 $1,669
Fair value of plan assets1,315
 1,289
1,402
 1,315
      
ABO in excess of plan assetsABO in excess of plan assets
2016 20152017 2016
Accumulated benefit obligation$1,531
 $1,452
$1,616
 $1,531
Fair value of plan assets1,315
 1,289
1,402
 1,315

(LG&E)

The funded status of LG&E's plan at December 31, was as follows:
Pension BenefitsPension Benefits
2016 20152017 2016
Change in Benefit Obligation 
  
 
  
Benefit Obligation, beginning of period$326
 $331
$329
 $326
Service cost1
 1
1
 1
Interest cost15
 14
13
 15
Plan amendments (a)
 10
6
 
Actuarial (gain) loss15
 (15)11
 15
Gross benefits paid (a)(28) (15)(34) (28)
Benefit Obligation, end of period329
 326
326
 329
   
Change in Plan Assets 
  
Plan assets at fair value, beginning of period318
 297
Actual return on plan assets41
 14
Employer contributions
 35
Gross benefits paid(34) (28)
Plan assets at fair value, end of period325
 318
   
Funded Status, end of period$(1) $(11)
   
Amounts recognized in the Balance Sheets consist of: 
  
Noncurrent liability$(1) $(11)
Net amount recognized, end of period$(1) $(11)
   
Amounts recognized in regulatory assets (pre-tax) consist of: 
  
Prior service cost$27
 $25
Net actuarial loss92
 110
Total$119
 $135
   
Total accumulated benefit obligation for defined benefit pension plan$326
 $329


199




 Pension Benefits
 2016 2015
    
Change in Plan Assets 
  
Plan assets at fair value, beginning of period297
 301
Actual return on plan assets14
 (2)
Employer contributions35
 13
Gross benefits paid(28) (15)
Plan assets at fair value, end of period318
 297
    
Funded Status, end of period$(11) $(29)
    
Amounts recognized in the Balance Sheets consist of: 
  
Noncurrent liability$(11) $(29)
Net amount recognized, end of period$(11) $(29)
    
Amounts recognized in regulatory assets (pre-tax) consist of: 
  
Prior service cost$25
 $29
Net actuarial loss110
 95
Total$135
 $124
    
Total accumulated benefit obligation for defined benefit pension plan$329
 $326
(a)
The pension plan was amended in December 2015 to allow active participants and terminated vested participants who had not previously elected a form of payment of their benefit to elect to receive their accrued pension benefit as a one-time lump-sum payment effective January 1, 2016. The projected benefit obligation at December 31, 2015 increased by $10$10 million as a result of the amendment. Gross benefits paid by the plan include $14 million of lump-sum cash payments made to the participants during 2017 and 2016 of$19 million and $14 million in connection with this offering.

LG&E's pension plan had projected and accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets at December 31, 20162017 and 2015.2016.
 
In addition to the plan it sponsors, LG&E is allocated a portion of the funded status and costs of certain defined benefit plans sponsored by LKELKE. LG&E is also allocated costs of defined benefit plans from LKS for defined benefit plans sponsored by LKE. See Note 14 for additional information on costs allocated to LG&E from LKS. These allocations are based on itsLG&E's participation in those plans, which management believes are reasonable. The actuarially determined obligations of current active employees and retired employees are used as a basis to allocate total plan activity, including active and retiree costs and obligations. Allocations to LG&E resulted in liabilities at December 31 as follows:
2016 20152017 2016
Pension$42
 $26
$44
 $42
Other postretirement benefits76
 77
74
 76
 
(PPL Electric)
 
Although PPL Electric does not directly sponsor any defined benefit plans, it is allocated a portion of the funded status and costs of plans sponsored by PPL Services based on its participation in those plans, which management believes are reasonable. As a result of the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply in 2015, pension and other postretirement plans were remeasured resulting in adjustments to PPL Electric's allocated balances of $56 million, reflected as a non-cash contribution on the Statement of Equity. The actuarially determined obligations of current active employees and retirees are used as a basis to allocate total plan activity, including active and retiree costs and obligations. Allocations to PPL Electric resulted in liabilities at December 31 as follows:
2016 20152017 2016
Pension$281
 $183
$246
 $281
Other postretirement benefits72
 67
62
 72
 
(KU)
 
Although KU does not directly sponsor any defined benefit plans, it is allocated a portion of the funded status and costs of plans sponsored by LKELKE. KU is also allocated costs of defined benefit plans from LKS for defined benefit plans sponsored by LKE. See Note 14 for additional information on costs allocated to KU from LKS. These allocations are based on itsKU's participation in those plans, which management believes are reasonable. The actuarially determined obligations of current active employees and retired employees of KU are used as a basis to allocate total plan activity, including active and retiree costs and obligations. Allocations to KU resulted in liabilities at December 31 as follows.


2016 20152017 2016
Pension$62
 $46
$36
 $62
Other postretirement benefits40
 42
32
 40
 
Plan Assets - U.S. Pension Plans
 
(PPL, LKE and LG&E)
 
PPL's primary legacy pension plan and the pension plans sponsored by LKE are invested in the PPL Services Corporation Master Trust (the Master Trust) that also includes 401(h) accounts that are restricted for certain other postretirement benefit obligations of PPL and LKE. The investment strategy for the Master Trust is to achieve a risk-adjusted return on a mix of assets that, in combination with PPL's funding policy, will ensure that sufficient assets are available to provide long-term growth and liquidity for benefit payments, while also managing the duration of the assets to complement the duration of the liabilities. The Master Trust benefits from a wide diversification of asset types, investment fund strategies and external investment fund managers, and therefore has no significant concentration of risk.
 
The investment policy of the Master Trust outlines investment objectives and defines the responsibilities of the EBPB, external investment managers, investment advisor and trustee and custodian. The investment policy is reviewed annually by PPL's Board of Directors.


200




 
The EBPB created a risk management framework around the trust assets and pension liabilities. This framework considers the trust assets as being composed of three sub-portfolios: growth, immunizing and liquidity portfolios. The growth portfolio is comprised of investments that generate a return at a reasonable risk, including equity securities, certain debt securities and alternative investments. The immunizing portfolio consists of debt securities, generally with long durations, and derivative positions. The immunizing portfolio is designed to offset a portion of the change in the pension liabilities due to changes in interest rates. The liquidity portfolio consists primarily of cash and cash equivalents.
 
Target allocation ranges have been developed for each portfolio on a plan basis based on input from external consultants with a goal of limiting funded status volatility. The EBPB monitors the investments in each portfolio, on a plan basis, and seeks to obtain a target portfolio that emphasizes reduction of risk of loss from market volatility. In pursuing that goal, the EBPB establishes revised guidelines from time to time. EBPB investment guidelines as of the end of 20162017 are presented below.
 
The asset allocation for the trust and the target allocation by portfolio at December 31 are as follows:
Percentage of trust assets 2016Percentage of trust assets 2017
2016 (a) 2015 
Target Asset
Allocation (a)
2017 (a) 2016 
Target Asset
Allocation (a)
Growth Portfolio52% 51% 50%56% 52% 55%
Equity securities30% 25%  32% 30%  
Debt securities (b)12% 13%  14% 12%  
Alternative investments10% 13%  10% 10%  
Immunizing Portfolio46% 47% 48%43% 46% 43%
Debt securities (b)43% 42%  39% 43%  
Derivatives3% 5%  4% 3%  
Liquidity Portfolio2% 2% 2%1% 2% 2%
Total100% 100% 100%100% 100% 100%
 
(a)Allocations exclude consideration of a group annuity contract held by the LG&E and KU Retirement Plan.
(b)Includes commingled debt funds, which PPL treats as debt securities for asset allocation purposes.

(LKE)
 
LKE has pension plans, including LG&E's plan, whose assets are invested solely in the Master Trust, which is fully disclosed below. The fair value of these plans' assets of $1.4 billion and $1.3 billion at December 31, 20162017 and 20152016 represents an interest of approximately 41%40% and 40%41% in the Master Trust.
 


(LG&E)
 
LG&E has a pension plan whose assets are invested solely in the Master Trust, which is fully disclosed below. The fair value of this plan's assets of $318$325 million and $297$318 million at December 31, 20162017 and 20152016 represents an interest of approximately 10%9% and 9%10% in the Master Trust.
 
(PPL, LKE and LG&E)
 
The fair value of net assets in the Master Trust by asset class and level within the fair value hierarchy was:
 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
   Fair Value Measurements Using   Fair Value Measurements Using
 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
PPL Services Corporation Master Trust 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents$181
 $181
 $
 $
 $225
 $225
 $
 $
Equity securities: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
U.S. Equity152
 152
 
 
 172
 172
 
 
U.S. Equity fund measured at NAV (a)272
 
 
 
 197
 
 
 
International equity fund at NAV (a)551
 
 
 
 454
 
 
 
Commingled debt measured at NAV (a)546
 
 
 
 514
 
 
 
Debt securities: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
U.S. Treasury and U.S. government sponsored
agency
381
 381
 
 
 501
 492
 9
 
Corporate850
 
 837
 13
 747
 
 737
 10
Other8
 
 8
 
 14
 
 14
 
Alternative investments: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Commodities measured at NAV (a)
 
 
 
 70
 
 
 
Real estate measured at NAV (a)102
 
 
 
 118
 
 
 
Private equity measured at NAV (a)80
 
 
 
 81
 
 
 
Hedge funds measured at NAV (a)167
 
  
  
 171
 
 
 
Derivatives: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Interest rate swaps and swaptions61
 
 61
 
 80
 
 80
 
Other3
 
 3
 
 11
 
 11
 
Insurance contracts27
 
 
 27
 32
 
 
 32
PPL Services Corporation Master Trust assets, at
fair value
3,381
 $714
 $909
 $40
 3,387
 $889
 $851
 $42
Receivables and payables, net (b)(15) 

  
  
 (49)  
  
  
401(h) accounts restricted for other
postretirement benefit obligations
(123)  
  
  
 (111)  
  
  
Total PPL Services Corporation Master Trust
pension assets
$3,243
  
  
  
 $3,227
  
  
  
 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
   Fair Value Measurements Using   Fair Value Measurements Using
 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
PPL Services Corporation Master Trust 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents$301
 $301
 $
 $
 $181
 $181
 $
 $
Equity securities: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
U.S. Equity229
 229
 
 
 152
 152
 
 
U.S. Equity fund measured at NAV (a)364
 
 
 
 272
 
 
 
International equity fund at NAV (a)538
 
 
 
 551
 
 
 
Commingled debt measured at NAV (a)611
 
 
 
 546
 
 
 


201




 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
   Fair Value Measurements Using   Fair Value Measurements Using
 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Debt securities: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
U.S. Treasury and U.S. government sponsored
agency
186
 186
 
 
 381
 381
 
 
Corporate883
 
 870
 13
 850
 
 837
 13
Other10
 
 10
 
 8
 
 8
 
Alternative investments: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Real estate measured at NAV (a)109
 
 
 
 102
 
 
 
Private equity measured at NAV (a)80
 
 
 
 80
 
 
 
Hedge funds measured at NAV (a)175
 
 
 
 167
 
 
 
Derivatives: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Interest rate swaps and swaptions50
 
 50
 
 61
 
 61
 
Other1
 
 1
 
 3
 
 3
 
Insurance contracts24
 
 
 24
 27
 
 
 27
PPL Services Corporation Master Trust assets, at
fair value
3,561
 $716
 $931
 $37
 3,381
 $714
 $909
 $40
Receivables and payables, net (b)72
 

  
  
 (15)  
  
  
401(h) accounts restricted for other
postretirement benefit obligations
(145)  
  
  
 (123)  
  
  
Total PPL Services Corporation Master Trust
pension assets
$3,488
  
  
  
 $3,243
  
  
  
 
(a)In accordance with accounting guidance certain investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (NAV), or its equivalent, practical expedient have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amounts presented in the table are intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in the statement of financial position.
(b)Receivables and payables represent amounts for investments sold/purchased but not yet settled along with interest and dividends earned but not yet received.

A reconciliation of the Master Trust assets classified as Level 3 at December 31, 20162017 is as follows:
Corporate
debt
 
Insurance
contracts
 Total
Corporate
debt
 
Insurance
contracts
 Total
Balance at beginning of period$10
 $32
 $42
$13
 $27
 $40
Actual return on plan assets          
Relating to assets still held at the reporting date
 1
 1

 1
 1
Purchases, sales and settlements3
 (6) (3)
 (4) (4)
Balance at end of period$13
 $27
 $40
$13
 $24
 $37
 


A reconciliation of the Master Trust assets classified as Level 3 at December 31, 20152016 is as follows: 
Corporate
debt
 
Insurance
contracts
 Total
Corporate
debt
 
Insurance
contracts
 Total
Balance at beginning of period$21
 $33
 $54
$10
 $32
 $42
Actual return on plan assets          
Relating to assets still held at the reporting date
 2
 2

 1
 1
Relating to assets sold during the period(1) 
 (1)
Purchases, sales and settlements(10) (3) (13)3
 (6) (3)
Balance at end of period$10
 $32
 $42
$13
 $27
 $40
 
The fair value measurements of cash and cash equivalents are based on the amounts on deposit.
 
The market approach is used to measure fair value of equity securities. The fair value measurements of equity securities (excluding commingled funds), which are generally classified as Level 1, are based on quoted prices in active markets. These securities represent actively and passively managed investments that are managed against various equity indices and exchange traded funds (ETFs).indices.
 
Investments in commingled equity and debt funds are categorized as equity securities. Investments in commingled equity funds include funds that invest in U.S. and international equity securities. Investments in commingled debt funds include funds that invest in a diversified portfolio of emerging market debt obligations, as well as funds that invest in investment grade long-duration fixed-income securities.



202




The fair value measurements of debt securities are generally based on evaluations that reflect observable market information, such as actual trade information for identical securities or for similar securities, adjusted for observable differences. The fair value of debt securities is generally measured using a market approach, including the use of pricing models, which incorporate observable inputs. Common inputs include benchmark yields, relevant trade data, broker/dealer bid/ask prices, benchmark securities and credit valuation adjustments. When necessary, the fair value of debt securities is measured using the income approach, which incorporates similar observable inputs as well as payment data, future predicted cash flows, collateral performance and new issue data. For the Master Trust, these securities represent investments in securities issued by U.S. Treasury and U.S. government sponsored agencies; investments securitized by residential mortgages, auto loans, credit cards and other pooled loans; investments in investment grade and non-investment grade bonds issued by U.S. companies across several industries; investments in debt securities issued by foreign governments and corporations.
Investments in commodities represent ownership interest of a commingled fund that is invested in a portfolio of exchange-traded futures and forward contracts in commodities to obtain broad exposure to all principal groups in the global commodity markets, including energies, agriculture and metals (both precious and industrial) using proprietary commodity trading strategies. Redemptions can be made the 15th calendar day and the last calendar day of the month with a specified notification period. The fund's fair value is based upon a value as calculated by the fund's administrator.
 
Investments in real estate represent an investment in a partnership whose purpose is to manage investments in core U.S. real estate properties diversified geographically and across major property types (e.g., office, industrial, retail, etc.). The manager is focused on properties with high occupancy rates with quality tenants. This results in a focus on high income and stable cash flows with appreciation being a secondary factor. Core real estate generally has a lower degree of leverage when compared with more speculative real estate investing strategies. The partnership has limitations on the amounts that may be redeemed based on available cash to fund redemptions. Additionally, the general partner may decline to accept redemptions when necessary to avoid adverse consequences for the partnership, including legal and tax implications, among others. The fair value of the investment is based upon a partnership unit value.
 
Investments in private equity represent interests in partnerships in multiple early-stage venture capital funds and private equity fund of funds that use a number of diverse investment strategies. Four of theThe partnerships have limited lives of at least 10 years, while the fifth has a life of 15 years, after which liquidating distributions will be received. Prior to the end of each partnership's life, the investment cannot be redeemed with the partnership; however, the interest may be sold to other parties, subject to the general partner's approval. The Master Trust has unfunded commitments of $22$28 million that may be required during the lives of the partnerships. Fair value is based on an ownership interest in partners' capital to which a proportionate share of net assets is attributed.
 
Investments in hedge funds represent investments in a fund of hedge funds. Hedge funds seek a return utilizing a number of diverse investment strategies. The strategies, when combined aim to reduce volatility and risk while attempting to deliver


positive returns under most market conditions. Major investment strategies for the fund of hedge funds include long/short equity, tactical trading, event driven, and relative value. Shares may be redeemed within 45 days prior written notice. The fund is subject to short term lockups and other restrictions. The fair value for the fund has been estimated using the net asset value per share.
 
The fair value measurements of derivative instruments utilize various inputs that include quoted prices for similar contracts or market-corroborated inputs. In certain instances, these instruments may be valued using models, including standard option valuation models and standard industry models. These securities primarily represent investments in interest rate swaps and swaptions (the option to enter into an interest rate swap), which are valued based on the swap details, such as swap curves, notional amount, index and term of index, reset frequency, volatility and payer/receiver credit ratings.
 
Insurance contracts, classified as Level 3, represent an investment in an immediate participation guaranteed group annuity contract. The fair value is based on contract value, which represents cost plus interest income less distributions for benefit payments and administrative expenses.
 
Plan Assets - U.S. Other Postretirement Benefit Plans

The investment strategy with respect to other postretirement benefit obligations is to fund VEBA trusts and/or 401(h) accounts with voluntary contributions and to invest in a tax efficient manner. Excluding the 401(h) accounts included in the Master Trust, other postretirement benefit plans are invested in a mix of assets for long-term growth with an objective of earning returns that provide liquidity as required for benefit payments. These plans benefit from diversification of asset types, investment fund strategies and investment fund managers, and therefore, have no significant concentration of risk. Equity securities include investments in domestic large-cap commingled funds. Ownership interests in commingled funds that invest entirely in debt securities are classified as equity securities, but treated as debt securities for asset allocation and target allocation purposes. Ownership interests in money market funds are treated as cash and cash equivalents for asset allocation and target allocation purposes. The asset allocation for the PPL VEBA trusts, excluding LKE, and the target allocation, by asset class, at December 31 are detailed below.

 Percentage of plan assets 
Target Asset
Allocation
 2016 2015 2016
Asset Class     
U.S. Equity securities48% 48% 45%
Debt securities (a)50% 50% 50%
Cash and cash equivalents (b)2% 2% 5%
Total100% 100% 100%

203




 Percentage of plan assets 
Target Asset
Allocation
 2017 2016 2017
Asset Class     
U.S. Equity securities47% 48% 45%
Debt securities (a)49% 50% 50%
Cash and cash equivalents (b)4% 2% 5%
Total100% 100% 100%
 

(a)Includes commingled debt funds and debt securities.
(b)Includes money market funds.

LKE's other postretirement benefit plan is invested primarily in a 401(h) account, as disclosed in the PPL Services Corporation Master Trust, with insignificant amounts invested in money market funds within VEBA trusts for liquidity.
 


The fair value of assets in the U.S. other postretirement benefit plans by asset class and level within the fair value hierarchy was:
December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
  Fair Value Measurement Using   Fair Value Measurement Using  Fair Value Measurement Using   Fair Value Measurement Using
Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Money market funds$5
 $5
 $
 $
 $6
 $6
 $
 $
$10
 $10
 $
 $
 $5
 $5
 $
 $
U.S. Equity securities: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Large-cap equity fund measure at NAV (a)123
 
 
 
 129
 
 
 
123
 
 
 
 123
 
 
 
Commingled debt fund measured at NAV (a)114
 
 
 
 109
 
 
 
96
 
 
 
 114
 
 
 
Debt securities: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Corporate bonds30
 
 30
 
 
 
 
 
Municipalities12
 
 12
 
 23
 
 23
 

 
 
 
 12
 
 12
 
Total VEBA trust assets, at fair value254
 $5
 $12
 $
 267
 $6
 $23
 $
259
 $10
 $30
 $
 254
 $5
 $12
 $
Receivables and payables, net (b)1
  
  
  
 1
  
  
  1
  
  
  
 1
  
  
  
401(h) account assets123
  
  
  
 111
  
  
  145
  
  
  
 123
  
  
  
Total other postretirement benefit plan assets$378
  
  
  
 $379
  
  
  $405
  
  
  
 $378
  
  
  
 
(a)In accordance with accounting guidance certain investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (NAV), or its equivalent, practical expedient have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amounts presented in the table are intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in the statement of financial position.
(b)Receivables and payables represent amounts for investments sold/purchased but not yet settled along with interest and dividends earned but not yet received.

Investments in money market funds represent investments in funds that invest primarily in a diversified portfolio of investment grade money market instruments, including, but not limited to, commercial paper, notes, repurchase agreements and other evidences of indebtedness with a maturity not exceeding 13 months from the date of purchase. The primary objective of the fund is a level of current income consistent with stability of principal and liquidity. Redemptions can be made daily on this fund.
 
Investments in large-cap equity securities represent investments in a passively managed equity index fund that invests in securities and a combination of other collective funds. Fair value measurements are not obtained from a quoted price in an active market but are based on firm quotes of net asset values per share as provided by the trustee of the fund. Redemptions can be made daily on this fund.
 
Investments in commingled debt securities represent investments in a fund that invests in a diversified portfolio of investment grade long-duration fixed income securities. Redemptions can be made daily on these funds.

Investments in corporate bonds represent investment in a diversified portfolio of investment grade long-duration fixed income securities. The fair value of debt securities are generally based on evaluations that reflect observable market information, such as actual trade information for identical securities or for similar securities, adjusted for observable differences.
 
Investments in municipalities represent investments in a diverse mix of tax-exempt municipal securities. The fair value measurements for these securities are based on recently executed transactions for identical securities or for similar securities.



204




Plan Assets - U.K. Pension Plans (PPL)
 
The overall investment strategy of WPD's pension plans is developed by each plan's independent trustees in its Statement of Investment Principles in compliance with the U.K. Pensions Act of 1995 and other U.K. legislation. The trustees' primary focus is to ensure that assets are sufficient to meet members' benefits as they fall due with a longer term objective to reduce investment risk. The investment strategy is intended to maximize investment returns while not incurring excessive volatility in the funding position. WPD's plans are invested in a wide diversification of asset types, fund strategies and fund managers; and therefore, have no significant concentration of risk. Commingled funds that consist entirely of debt securities are traded as equity units, but treated by WPD as debt securities for asset allocation and target allocation purposes. These include investments in U.K. corporate bonds and U.K. gilts.
 


The asset allocation and target allocation at December 31 of WPD's pension plans are detailed below.
    Target Asset    Target Asset
Percentage of plan assets AllocationPercentage of plan assets Allocation
2016 2015 20162017 2016 2017
Asset Class          
Cash and cash equivalents1% 1% 1%2% 1% %
Equity securities          
U.K.3% 3% 3%2% 3% 2%
European (excluding the U.K.)2% 2% 2%1% 2% 1%
Asian-Pacific2% 2% 2%1% 2% 1%
North American3% 3% 3%1% 3% 1%
Emerging markets3% 4% 1%1% 3% 1%
Global equities6% 6% 3%16% 6% 10%
Currency% 1% %
Global Tactical Asset Allocation33% 31% 40%33% 33% 41%
Debt securities (a)41% 40% 39%37% 41% 38%
Alternative investments6% 7% 6%6% 6% 5%
Total100% 100% 100%100% 100% 100%
 

(a)Includes commingled debt funds.

The fair value of assets in the U.K. pension plans by asset class and level within the fair value hierarchy was:
December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
  Fair Value Measurement Using   Fair Value Measurement Using  Fair Value Measurement Using   Fair Value Measurement Using
Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Cash and cash equivalents$42
 $42
 $
 $
 $55
 $55
 $
 $
$216
 $216
 $
 $
 $42
 $42
 $
 $
Equity securities measured at NAV (a) : 
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
U.K. companies210
 
 
 
 274
 
 
 
157
 
 
 
 210
 
 
 
European companies (excluding the U.K.)177
 
 
 
 190
 
 
 
98
 
 
 
 177
 
 
 
Asian-Pacific companies140
 
 
 
 132
 
 
 
60
 
 
 
 140
 
 
 
North American companies227
 
 
 
 220
 
 
 
123
 
 
 
 227
 
 
 
Emerging markets companies209
 
 
 
 284
 
 
 
62
 
 
 
 209
 
 
 
Global Equities466
 
 
 
 500
 
 
 
1,335
 
 
 
 466
 
 
 
Currency
 
 
 
 39
 
 
 
Other2,363
 
 
 
 2,384
 
 
  2,807
 
 
 
 2,363
 
 
 
Commingled debt: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
U.K. corporate bonds
 
 
 
 2
 
 
 
U.K. gilts
 
 
 
 3
 
 
 
Debt Securities: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
U.K. corporate bonds2
 
 2
 
 364
 
 364
 
3
 
 3
 
 2
 
 2
 
U.K. gilts2,940
 
 2,940
 
 2,645
 
 2,645
 
3,137
 
 3,137
 
 2,940
 
 2,940
 
Alternative investments: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Real estate measured at NAV (a)435
 
 
 
 533
 
 
 
492
 
 
 
 435
 
 
 
Fair value - U.K. pension plans$7,211
 $42
 $2,942
 $
 $7,625
 $55
 $3,009
 $
$8,490
 $216
 $3,140
 $
 $7,211
 $42
 $2,942
 $
 
(a)In accordance with accounting guidance certain investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (NAV), or its equivalent, practical expedient have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amounts presented in the table are intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in the statement of financial position.

Except for investments in real estate, the fair value measurements of WPD's pension plan assets are based on the same inputs and measurement techniques used to measure the U.S. pension plan assets described above.



205




Investments in equity securities represent actively and passively managed funds that are measured against various equity indices.

Other comprises a range of investment strategies, which invest in a variety of assets including equities, bonds, currencies, real estate and forestry held in unitized funds, which are considered in the Global Tactical Asset Allocation target.
 


U.K. corporate bonds include investment grade corporate bonds of companies from diversified U.K. industries.
 
U.K. gilts include gilts, index-linked gilts and swaps intended to track a portion of the plans' liabilities.
 
Investments in real estate represent holdings in a U.K. unitized fund that owns and manages U.K. industrial and commercial real estate with a strategy of earning current rental income and achieving capital growth. The fair value measurement of the fund is based upon a net asset value per share, which is based on the value of underlying properties that are independently appraised in accordance with Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors valuation standards at least annually with quarterly valuation updates based on recent sales of similar properties, leasing levels, property operations and/or market conditions. The fund may be subject to redemption restrictions in the unlikely event of a large forced sale in order to ensure other unit holders are not disadvantaged.
 
Expected Cash Flows - U.S. Defined Benefit Plans (PPL)
 
While PPL's U.S. defined benefit pension plans have the option to utilize available prior year credit balances to meet current and future contribution requirements, PPL contributed $53$145 million to its U.S. pension plans in January 2017.2018. No additional contributions are expected in 2017.2018.
 
PPL sponsors various non-qualified supplemental pension plans for which no assets are segregated from corporate assets. PPL expects to make approximately $17$13 million of benefit payments under these plans in 2017.2018.
 
PPL is not required to make contributions to its other postretirement benefit plans but has historically funded these plans in amounts equal to the postretirement benefit costs recognized. Continuation of this past practice would cause PPL to contribute $14 million to its other postretirement benefit plans in 2017.2018.
 
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid by the plans and the following federal subsidy payments are expected to be received by PPL.
  Other Postretirement  Other Postretirement
Pension 
Benefit
Payment
 
Expected
Federal
Subsidy
Pension 
Benefit
Payment
 
Expected
Federal
Subsidy
2017$251
 $52
 $1
2018252
 51
 1
$260
 $51
 $1
2019261
 51
 1
269
 51
 
2020263
 50
 
268
 50
 1
2021267
 49
 
270
 49
 
2022-20261,344
 228
 2
2022272
 48
 
2023-20271,328
 218
 2
 
(LKE)
 
While LKE's defined benefit pension plans have the option to utilize available prior year credit balances to meet current and future contribution requirements, LKE contributed $18$105 million to its pension plans in January 2017.2018. No additional contributions are expected in 2017.2018.
 
LKE sponsors various non-qualified supplemental pension plans for which no assets are segregated from corporate assets. LKE expects to make $4 million of benefit payments under these plans in 2017.2018.
 
LKE is not required to make contributions to its other postretirement benefit plan but has historically funded this plan in amounts equal to the postretirement benefit costs recognized. Continuation of this past practice would cause LKE to contribute a projected $14 million to its other postretirement benefit plan in 2017.2018.
 


206




The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid by the plans and the following federal subsidy payments are expected to be received by LKE.
  Other Postretirement  Other Postretirement
Pension 
Benefit
Payment
 
Expected
Federal
Subsidy
Pension 
Benefit
Payment
 
Expected
Federal
Subsidy
2017$105
 $14
 $
2018108
 14
 
$109
 $14
 $
2019110
 15
 1
113
 15
 
2020111
 16
 
114
 16
 1
2021113
 16
 
115
 16
 
2022-2026569
 82
 2
2022116
 16
 
2023-2027573
 79
 2
 
(LG&E)
 
While LG&E's defined benefit pension plan has the option to utilize available prior year credit balances to meet current and future contribution requirements. Thererequirements, LG&E contributed $54 million to its pension plan in January 2018. No additional contributions are no contributions expected to be made in 2017.2018.

The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid by the plan.
PensionPension
2017$25
201825
$26
201925
26
202025
26
202124
25
2022-2026110
202224
2023-2027104
 
Expected Cash Flows - U.K. Pension Plans (PPL)
 
The pension plans of WPD are subject to formal actuarial valuations every three years, which are used to determine funding requirements. Contribution requirements were evaluated in accordance with the valuationsvaluation performed as of March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2016. WPD expects to make contributions of approximately $389$191 million in 2017, including $98 million WPD contributed to its U.K. pension plans in January 2017.2018. WPD is currently permitted to recover in current revenues approximately 78% of its pension funding requirements for its primary pension plans.
 
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid by the plans.
PensionPension
2017$314
2018317
$343
2019322
349
2020326
353
2021329
356
2022-20261,693
2022362
2023-20271,843
 
Savings Plans (All Registrants)
 
Substantially all employees of PPL's subsidiaries are eligible to participate in deferred savings plans (401(k)s). Employer contributions to the plans were:
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
PPL$35
 $34
 $33
$36
 $35
 $34
PPL Electric6
 6
 6
6
 6
 6
LKE17
 16
 15
18
 17
 16
LG&E5
 5
 5
5
 5
 5
KU4
 4
 4
4
 4
 4
 


207




Separation Benefits
 
Certain PPL subsidiaries provide separation benefits to eligible employees. These benefits may be provided in the case of separations due to performance issues, loss of job-related qualifications or organizational changes. Until December 1, 2012, certain employees separated were eligible forThese benefits include cash severance payments outplacement services, accelerated stock award vesting, continuation of group health and welfare coverage, and enhanced pension and postretirement medical benefits. As of December 1, 2012, separation benefits for certain employees were changed to eliminate accelerated stock award vesting and enhanced pension and postretirement medical benefits. Also, the continuation of group health and welfare coverage was replaced with a single sum payment approximating the dollar amount of premium payments that would be incurred for continuation of group health and welfare coverage.coverage based on an employee's years of service along with outplacement services. Separation benefits are recorded when such amounts are probable and estimable.
 
See Note 8 for a discussion of separation benefits recognized in 2015 and 2014 related to the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply. Separation benefits were not significant in 2017 and 2016.
 
12. Jointly Owned Facilities
 
(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
 
At December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, the Balance Sheets reflect the owned interests in the facilities listed below.
 
Ownership
Interest
 Electric Plant 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Construction
Work
in Progress
 
Ownership
Interest
 Electric Plant 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Construction
Work
in Progress
PPL and LKEPPL and LKE       PPL and LKE       
December 31, 2016       December 31, 2017       
Generating Plants       Generating Plants       
Trimble County Unit 175.00% $407
 $55
 $1
Trimble County Unit 175.00% $427
 $69
 $1
Trimble County Unit 275.00% 1,026
 161
 83
Trimble County Unit 275.00% 1,032
 176
 198
                
December 31, 2015 
  
  
  
December 31, 2016 
  
  
  
Generating Plants 
  
  
  
Generating Plants 
  
  
  
Trimble County Unit 175.00% $399
 $44
 $6
Trimble County Unit 175.00% $407
 $55
 $1
Trimble County Unit 275.00% 1,013
 141
 27
Trimble County Unit 275.00% 1,026
 161
 83
                
LG&ELG&E       LG&E       
December 31, 2016       December 31, 2017       
Generating Plants       Generating Plants       
E.W. Brown Units 6-738.00% $40
 $15
 $
E.W. Brown Units 6-738.00% $41
 $17
 $
Paddy's Run Unit 13 & E.W. Brown Unit 553.00% 55
 12
 1
Paddy's Run Unit 13 & E.W. Brown Unit 553.00% 52
 15
 
Trimble County Unit 175.00% 407
 55
 1
Trimble County Unit 175.00% 427
 69
 1
Trimble County Unit 214.25% 214
 32
 43
Trimble County Unit 214.25% 215
 36
 102
Trimble County Units 5-629.00% 30
 8
 1
Trimble County Units 5-629.00% 32
 9
 
Trimble County Units 7-1037.00% 71
 17
 1
Trimble County Units 7-1037.00% 73
 21
 
Cane Run Unit 722.00% 114
 5
 2
Cane Run Unit 722.00% 120
 8
 1
E.W. Brown Solar Unit39.00% 10
 
 
E.W. Brown Solar Unit39.00% 10
 1
 
                
December 31, 2015 
  
  
  
December 31, 2016 
  
  
  
Generating Plants 
  
  
  
Generating Plants 
  
  
  
E.W. Brown Units 6-738.00% $40
 $12
 $
E.W. Brown Units 6-738.00% $40
 $15
 $
Paddy's Run Unit 13 & E.W. Brown Unit 553.00% 47
 10
 1
Paddy's Run Unit 13 & E.W. Brown Unit 553.00% 55
 12
 1
Trimble County Unit 175.00% 399
 44
 6
Trimble County Unit 175.00% 407
 55
 1
Trimble County Unit 214.25% 210
 28
 12
Trimble County Unit 214.25% 214
 32
 43
Trimble County Units 5-629.00% 29
 6
 
Trimble County Units 5-629.00% 30
 8
 1
Trimble County Units 7-1037.00% 71
 14
 
Trimble County Units 7-1037.00% 71
 17
 1
Cane Run Unit 722.00% 115
 1
 1
Cane Run Unit 722.00% 114
 5
 2
E.W. Brown Solar Unit39.00% 
 
 4
E.W. Brown Solar Unit39.00% 10
 
 


208




  
Ownership
Interest
 Electric Plant 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Construction
Work
in Progress
         
KU       
 December 31, 2016       
 Generating Plants       
 E.W. Brown Units 6-762.00% $65
 $23
 $
 Paddy's Run Unit 13 & E.W. Brown Unit 547.00% 50
 11
 1
 Trimble County Unit 260.75% 812
 129
 40
 Trimble County Units 5-671.00% 74
 19
 
 Trimble County Units 7-1063.00% 121
 29
 1
 Cane Run Unit 778.00% 412
 18
 4
 E.W. Brown Solar Unit61.00% 15
 
 
         
 December 31, 2015 
  
  
  
 Generating Plants 
  
  
  
 E.W. Brown Units 6-762.00% $65
 $19
 $
 Paddy's Run Unit 13 & E.W. Brown Unit 547.00% 43
 9
 1
 Trimble County Unit 260.75% 803
 113
 15
 Trimble County Units 5-671.00% 70
 15
 
 Trimble County Units 7-1063.00% 121
 23
 
 Cane Run Unit 778.00% 411
 6
 5
 E.W. Brown Solar Unit61.00% 
 
 6
  
Ownership
Interest
 Electric Plant 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Construction
Work
in Progress
         
KU       
 December 31, 2017       
 Generating Plants       
 E.W. Brown Units 6-762.00% $66
 $27
 $
 Paddy's Run Unit 13 & E.W. Brown Unit 547.00% 46
 13
 
 Trimble County Unit 260.75% 817
 140
 96
 Trimble County Units 5-671.00% 76
 20
 
 Trimble County Units 7-1063.00% 120
 34
 
 Cane Run Unit 778.00% 431
 31
 4
 E.W. Brown Solar Unit61.00% 16
 1
 
         
 December 31, 2016 
  
  
  
 Generating Plants 
  
  
  
 E.W. Brown Units 6-762.00% $65
 $23
 $
 Paddy's Run Unit 13 & E.W. Brown Unit 547.00% 50
 11
 1
 Trimble County Unit 260.75% 812
 129
 40
 Trimble County Units 5-671.00% 74
 19
 
 Trimble County Units 7-1063.00% 121
 29
 1
 Cane Run Unit 778.00% 412
 18
 4
 E.W. Brown Solar Unit61.00% 15
 
 

Each subsidiary owning these interests provides its own funding for its share of the facility. Each receives a portion of the total output of the generating plants equal to its percentage ownership. The share of fuel and other operating costs associated with the plants is included in the corresponding operating expenses on the Statements of Income.
 
13. Commitments and Contingencies
 
(PPL)
 
All commitments, contingencies and guarantees associated with PPL Energy Supply and its subsidiaries were retained by Talen Energy and its subsidiaries at the spinoff date without recourse to PPL.
 
Energy Purchase Commitments (PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
 
LG&E and KU enter into purchase contracts to supply the coal and natural gas requirements for generation facilities and LG&E's retail natural gas supply operations. These contracts include the following commitments: 
Contract Type
Maximum Maturity
Date
Natural Gas Fuel20172019
Natural Gas Retail Supply2019
Coal20222023
Coal Transportation and Fleeting Services2024
Natural Gas Storage2024
Natural Gas Transportation2026
 


209




LG&E and KU have a power purchase agreement with OVEC expiring in June 2040. See footnote (f) to the table in "Guarantees and Other Assurances" below for information on the OVEC power purchase contract, including recent developments in credit or debt conditions relating to OVEC. Future obligations for power purchases from OVEC are unconditional demand payments, comprised of debt servicedebt-service payments as well as contractually required reimbursementand contractually-required reimbursements of plant operating, maintenance and other expenses, and are projected as follows: 
LG&E KU TotalLG&E KU Total
2017$20
 $9
 $29
201820
 9
 29
$20
 $9
 $29
201919
 9
 28
19
 8
 27
202020
 9
 29
18
 8
 26
202120
 9
 29
19
 8
 27
202219
 8
 27
Thereafter389
 172
 561
316
 141
 457
Total$488
 $217
 $705
$411
 $182
 $593

LG&E and KU had total energy purchases under the OVEC power purchase agreement for the years ended December 31 as follows:
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
LG&E$16
 $15
 $17
$14
 $16
 $15
KU7
 7
 8
6
 7
 7
Total$23
 $22
 $25
$20
 $23
 $22
 
Legal Matters
 
(All Registrants)
 
PPL and its subsidiaries are involved in legal proceedings, claims and litigation in the ordinary course of business. PPL and its subsidiaries cannot predict the outcome of such matters, or whether such matters may result in material liabilities, unless otherwise noted.
(PPL and LKE)

WKE Indemnification(PPL and LKE)
 
See footnote (e) to the table in "Guarantees and Other Assurances" below for information on an LKE indemnity relating to its former WKE lease, including related legal proceedings.

(PPL, LKE and LG&E)

Cane Run Environmental Claims
 
In December 2013, six residents, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, filed a class action complaint against LG&E and PPL in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky alleging violations of the Clean Air Act, RCRA, and RCRA. In addition, these plaintiffs assert common law claims of nuisance, trespass and negligence. These plaintiffs seek injunctive relief and civil penalties, plus costs and attorney fees, for the alleged statutory violations. Under the common law claims, these plaintiffs seek monetary compensation and punitive damages for property damage and diminished property values for a class consisting of residents within four miles of the Cane Run plant. In their individual capacities, these plaintiffs sought compensation for alleged adverse health effects. In response to a motion to dismiss filed by PPL and LG&E, in July 2014, the court dismissed the plaintiffs' RCRA claims and all but one Clean Air Act claim, but declined to dismiss theirthe common law tort claims. In November 2016, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint removing the personal injury claims and removing certain previously named plaintiffs. In February 2017, the District Court issued an order dismissing PPL as a defendant and dismissing the final federal claim against LG&E, under&E. On April 13, 2017, the Clean Air Act, and directed the parties to submit briefs regarding whether the court should continuefederal District Court issued an order declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction on the state law claims and dismissed the case in its entirety. On June 16, 2017, the plaintiffs filed a class action complaint in Jefferson Circuit Court, Kentucky, against LG&E alleging state law nuisance, negligence and trespass tort claims. The plaintiffs seek compensatory and punitive damages for alleged property damage due to purported plant emissions on behalf of a class of residents within one to three miles of the plant. Proceedings are currently underway regarding the remaining state law-only claims.potential class certification, for which a decision may occur in late 2018 or in 2019. PPL, LKE and LG&E cannot predict the outcome of this matter. LG&E retired one coal-fired unit at the Cane Run plant in March 2015 and the remaining two coal-fired units at the plant in June 2015.
 


210




Mill Creek Environmental Claims
In May 2014, the Sierra Club filed a citizen suit against LG&E in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky for alleged violations of the Clean Water Act. The Sierra Club alleged that various discharges at the Mill Creek plant constituted violations of the plant's water discharge permit. The Sierra Club sought civil penalties, injunctive relief, costs and attorney's fees. The parties reached a proposed settlement in the matter in September 2016. LG&E has agreed to limited alterations to outfall facilities and discharge practices and to fund $1 million in environmental enhancement projects focused on tree planting and water quality in Kentucky. The settlement includes no finding or agreement of any violation of law by LG&E and does not involve fines or civil penalties. In December 2016, the court approved the proposed settlement which resolves the pending litigation.
(PPL, LKE and KU)

E.W. Brown Environmental Claims
 
In October 2015, KU received a notice of intent from EarthjusticeOn July 12, 2017, the Kentucky Waterways Alliance and the Sierra Club informing certain federal and state agencies of the Sierra Club's intent to filefiled a citizen suit following expirationcomplaint against KU in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of the mandatory 60-day notification period, for alleged violations of the Clean Water Act. The claimants allegeKentucky alleging discharges at the E.W. Brown plant in violation of applicable rulesthe Clean Water Act and the plant's water discharge permit. The claimants assert that, unless the alleged discharges are promptly brought into compliance, it intends to seek civil penalties, injunctive reliefpermit and attorney's fees. In November 2015, the claimants submitted an amended notice of intent to add the Kentucky Waterways Alliance as a claimant. On October 26, 2016, the claimants submitted an additional notice of intent alleging management of waste in a mannercontamination that may present an imminent and substantial endangerment underin violation of the RCRA. The plaintiffs' suit relates to prior notices of intent to file a citizen suit submitted in October and November 2015 and October 2016. These plaintiffs sought injunctive relief ordering KU to take all actions necessary to comply with the Clean Water Act and RCRA, including ceasing the discharges in question, abating effects associated with prior discharges and eliminating the alleged imminent and substantial endangerment. These plaintiffs also sought assessment of civil penalties and an award of litigation costs and attorney fees. On December 28, 2017 the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky issued an order dismissing the Clean Water Act and RCRA complaints against KU in their entirety. On January 26, 2018, the plaintiffs appealed the dismissal order to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. KU is undertaking extensive remedial measures at the Brown plant including closure of the former ash pond, implementation of a groundwater remedial action plan, and performance of a corrective action plan including aquatic study of adjacent surface waters and risk assessment. PPL, LKE and KU cannot predict the outcome of this matter or the potential impact on the operations of the E. W. Brown plant, including increased capital or operating costs, if any.these matters.

(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
 
Trimble County Unit 2 Air Permit
The Sierra Club and other environmental groups petitioned the Kentucky Environmental and Public Protection Cabinet to overturn the air permit issued for the Trimble County Unit 2 baseload coal-fired generating unit, but the agency upheld the permit in an order issued in September 2007. In response to subsequent petitions by environmental groups, the EPA ordered certain non-material changes to the permit, which in January 2010, were incorporated into a final revised permit issued by the Kentucky Division for Air Quality. In March 2010, the environmental groups petitioned the EPA to object to the revised state permit. Until the EPA issues a final ruling on the pending petition and all available appeals are exhausted, PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU cannot predict the outcome of this matter or the potential impact on the operations of the Trimble County plant, including increased capital or operating costs, if any.

Trimble County Water Discharge Permit
 
In May 2010, the Kentucky Waterways Alliance and other environmental groups filed a petition with the Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet (KEEC) challenging the Kentucky Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit issued in April 2010, which covers water discharges from the Trimble County plant. In November 2010, the KEEC issued a final order upholding the permit, which was subsequently appealed by the environmental groups. In September 2013, the Franklin Circuit Court reversed the KEEC order upholding the permit and remanded the permit to the agency for further proceedings. LG&E and the KEEC appealed the order to the Kentucky Court of Appeals. In July 2015, the Court of Appeals upheld the lower court ruling. LG&E and the KEEC moved for discretionary review by the Kentucky Supreme Court. In February 2016, the Kentucky Supreme Court issued an order granting discretionary review and oral arguments were held in September 2016. On April 27, 2017, the Kentucky Supreme Court issued an order reversing the decision of the appellate court and upholding the permit issued to LG&E by the KEEC.

Trimble County Landfill
Various state and federal permits and regulatory approvals are required in order to construct a landfill at the Trimble County plant to be used for disposal of CCRs. In October 2016, the Kentucky Division of Water issued a water quality certification and in February 2017, the Kentucky Division of Waste Management issued a "special waste" landfill permit. In March 2017, the Sierra Club and a resident adjacent to the plant filed administrative challenges to the landfill permit which were subsequently dismissed by agreed order entered in August 2017. In June 2017, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issued a dredge and fill permit, the final approval required for construction of the landfill. PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU are unable to predictbelieve that all permits and regulatory approvals issued for the outcome of this matter or the potential impact on the operations of the Trimble County plant, including increased capital or operating costs, if any.project comply with applicable state and federal laws.

(All Registrants)

Regulatory Issues
 
See Note 6 for information on regulatory matters related to utility rate regulation.


Electricity - Reliability Standards
 
The NERC is responsible for establishing and enforcing mandatory reliability standards (Reliability Standards) regarding the bulk electric system in North America. The FERC oversees this process and independently enforces the Reliability Standards.
 
The Reliability Standards have the force and effect of law and apply to certain users of the bulk electric system, including electric utility companies, generators and marketers. Under the Federal Power Act, the FERC may assess civil penalties for certain violations.
 


211




PPL Electric, LG&E KU and PPL ElectricKU monitor their compliance with the Reliability Standards and self-report or self-log potential violations of applicable reliability requirements whenever identified, and submit accompanying mitigation plans, as required. The resolution of a small number of potential violations is pending. Penalties incurred to date have not been significant. Any Regional Reliability Entity (including RFC or SERC) determination concerning the resolution of violations of the Reliability Standards remains subject to the approval of the NERC and the FERC.
 
In the course of implementing their programs to ensure compliance with the Reliability Standards by those PPL affiliates subject to the standards, certain other instances of potential non-compliance may be identified from time to time. The Registrants cannot predict the outcome of these matters, and cannot estimate a range of reasonably possible losses, if any.
 
Environmental Matters
 
(All Registrants)
 
Due to the environmental issues discussed below or other environmental matters, it may be necessary for the Registrants to modify, curtail, replace or cease operation of certain facilities or performance of certain operations to comply with statutes, regulations and other requirements of regulatory bodies or courts. In addition, legal challenges to new environmental permits or rules add to the uncertainty of estimating the future cost of these permits and rules. Finally, the regulatory reviews specified in the President's March 2017 Executive Order (the March 2017 Executive Order) promoting energy independence and economic growth could result in future regulatory changes and additional uncertainty.

WPD's distribution businesses are subject to certain statutory and regulatory environmental requirements. In connection with the matters discussed below, itIt may be necessary for WPD to incur significant compliance costs, which costs may be recoverable through rates subject to the approval of Ofgem. PPL believes that WPD has taken and continues to take measures to comply with all applicable environmental laws and regulations.

LG&E and KU are entitled to recover, through the ECR mechanism, certain costs of complying with the Clean Air Act, as amended, and those federal, state or local environmental requirements applicable to coal combustion wastes and by-products from facilities that generate electricity from coal in accordance with approved compliance plans. Costs not covered by the ECR mechanism for LG&E and KU and all such costs for PPL Electric are subject to rate recovery before the companies' respective state regulatory authorities, or the FERC, if applicable. Because neither WPD nor PPL Electric owns any generating plants, their exposure to related environmental compliance costs is reduced. PPL, PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU can provide no assurances as to the ultimate outcome of future environmental or rate proceedings before regulatory authorities.

Air

(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)

NAAQS

The Clean Air Act, which regulates air pollutants from mobile and stationary sources in the United States, has a significant impact on the operation of fossil fuel generation plants. TheAmong other things, the Clean Air Act requires the EPA periodically to review and establish concentration levels in the ambient air for six criteria pollutants to protect public health and welfare. These concentration levels are known as NAAQS. The six criteria pollutants are carbon monoxide, lead, nitrogen dioxide, ozone (contributed to by nitrogen oxide emissions), particulate matter and sulfur dioxide. The established concentration levels for these six pollutants are known as NAAQS. Under the Clean Air Act, the EPA is required to reassess the NAAQS on a five-year schedule.

Federal environmental regulations of these criteriasix pollutants require states to adopt implementation plans, known as state implementation plans, for certain pollutants, which detail how the state will attain the standards that are mandated by the relevant law or regulation. Each state identifies the areas within its boundaries that meet the NAAQS (attainment areas) and those that do not (non-attainment areas), and must develop a state implementation plan both to bring non-attainment areas into compliance with the NAAQS and to maintain good air quality in attainment areas. In addition, for attainment of ozone and fine particulates standards, states in the eastern portion of the country, including Kentucky, are subject to a regional program developed by the EPA known as the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule. The NAAQS, future revisions to the NAAQS and state


implementation plans, or future revisions to regional programs, may require installation of additional pollution controls, the costs of which PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU believe are subject to cost recovery.
 
Although PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU do not anticipate significant costs to comply with these programs, changes in market or operating conditions could result in different costs than anticipated.

National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)

212




 
UnderOzone
The EPA issued the Clean Air Act, the EPA is required to reassess the NAAQS for certain air pollutants on a five-year schedule. In 2008, the EPA revised the NAAQS forcurrent ozone and proposed to further strengthen the standard in November 2014. The EPA released a new ozone standard on October 1, 2015. The states and the EPA willare required to determine attainment with the new ozone standard through review of relevant(based on ambient air monitoring data, withdata) those areas that meet the standard and those that are in non-attainment. The EPA was scheduled to designate areas as being in attainment or nonattainment designations scheduledof the current ozone standard by no later than October 2017. 2017 which was to be followed by further regulatory proceedings identifying compliance measures and deadlines. However, the current implementation and compliance schedule is uncertain because the EPA failed to make nonattainment demonstrations by the applicable deadline. In addition, some industry groups have requested the EPA to defer implementation of the 2015 ozone standard, but the EPA has not yet acted on this request. While implementation of the 2015 ozone standard could potentially require the addition of SCRs at some LG&E and KU generating units, PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU are currently unable to determine what the compliance measures and deadlines may ultimately be with respect to the new standard.

States are also obligated to address interstate transport issues associated with new ozone standards through the establishment of "good neighbor" state implementation plans for those states that are found to contribute significantly to another state's non-attainment. States that are not inAs a result of a partial consent decree addressing claims regarding federal implementation, the ozone transport region,EPA and several states, including Kentucky, worked together to evaluateare evaluating the need for further nitrogen oxide reductions from fossil-fueled plants with SCRs. Based on regulatory developments to date,address interstate impacts. While PPL, LKE, LG&E, and KU do not anticipateare unable to predict the outcome of ongoing and future evaluations by the EPA and the states, such evaluations could potentially result in requirements for nitrogen oxide reductions beyond those currently required under the Cross State Air Pollution Rule.

Sulfur Dioxide

In 2010, the EPA finalized revisedissued the current NAAQS for sulfur dioxide and required states to identify areas that meet those standards and areas that are in "non-attainment". In July 2013, the EPA finalized non-attainment designations for parts of the country, including part of Jefferson County in Kentucky. Attainment must be achieved by 2018. Based on regulatory developmentsAs a result of scrubber replacements completed by LG&E at the Mill Creek plant in 2016, all Jefferson County monitors now indicate compliance with the sulfur dioxide standards. Additionally, LG&E accepted a new sulfur dioxide emission limit to date,ensure continuing compliance with the NAAQS. PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU expect that certain previously required compliancedo not anticipate any further measures such as upgraded or new sulfur dioxide Scrubbers and additional sulfur dioxide limits at certain plants and the retirement of coal-fired generating units at LG&E's Cane Run plant and KU's Green River plant, are sufficient to achieve compliance with the new sulfur dioxide and ozone standards.
Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS)
In February 2012, the EPA finalized the MATS rule requiring reductions of mercury and other hazardous air pollutants from fossil-fuel fired power plants, with an effective date of April 16, 2012. In a subsequent judicial challenge, the U.S. Supreme Court (Supreme Court) held that the EPA failed to properly consider costs when deciding to regulate hazardous air emissions from power plants under MATS. The Supreme Court remanded the matter to the D.C. Circuit Court which, in December 2015, remanded the rule to the EPA without vacating it. The EPA has proposed a supplemental finding regarding costs of the rule. The EPA's MATS rule remains in effect during the pendency of the ongoing proceedings.
LG&E and KU have installed significant controls in response to the MATS rule and in conjunction with compliance with other environmental requirements, including fabric-filter baghouses, upgraded Scrubbers or chemical additive systems for which appropriate KPSC authorization and/or ECR treatment has been received. LG&E and KU have received KPSC approval for a compliance plan providing for installation of additional MATS-related controls; however, the estimated cost of these controls is not expected to be significant for either LG&E or KU. See Note 6 for additional information.

New Source Review (NSR)
The NSR litigation brought by the EPA, states and environmental groups against coal-fired generating plants in past years continues to proceed through the courts. Although none of this litigation directly involves PPL, LKE, LG&E or KU, it can influence the permitting of large capital projects at LG&E's and KU's power plants, the costs of which cannot presently be determined but could be significant.
Climate Change
 
There is continuing world-wide attention focused on issues related to climate change. In June 2016, the President Obama announced that the United States, Canada and Mexico have established the North American Climate, Clean Energy, and Environment Partnership Plan, which specifies actions to promote clean energy, address climate change and protect the environment. The plan includes a goal to provide 50% of the energy used in North America from clean energy sources by 2025. The plan does not impose any nation-specific requirements.

In December 2015, 195 nations, including the U.S., signed the Paris Agreement on Climate, which establishes a comprehensive framework for the reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG)GHG emissions from both developed and developing nations. Although the


agreement does not establish binding reduction requirements, it requires each nation to prepare, communicate, and maintain GHG reduction commitments. Reductions can be achieved in a variety of ways, including energy conservation, power plant efficiency improvements, reduced utilization of coal-fired generation or replacing coal-fired generation with natural gas or renewable generation. Based on the EPA's Clean Power Plan described below,rules issued in 2015 imposing GHG emission standards for both new and existing power plants, the U.S. has committed to an initial reduction target of 26% to 28% below 2005 levels by 2025. However, on June 1, 2017, President Trump announced a plan to withdraw from the Paris Agreement and undertake negotiations to reenter the current agreement or enter a new agreement on terms more favorable to the U.S. presidential administration has expressed an intentionUnder the terms of the Paris Agreement, any U.S. withdrawal would not be complete until November 2020.

Additionally, the March 2017 Executive Order directed the EPA to review existing Climate Change commitments to determine if changes are warranted.its 2015 greenhouse gas rules for consistency with certain policy directives and suspend, revise, or rescind those rules as appropriate. The March 2017 Executive Order also directs rescission of specified guidance, directives, and prior Presidential actions regarding climate change. PPL, LKE, LG&E, and KU cannot predict the outcome of such reviewregulatory actions or the impact, if any, on plant operations, rate treatment or future capital or operating needs.

The U.K. has enacted binding carbon reduction requirements that are applicable to WPD. Under the U.K. law, WPD must purchase carbon allowances to offset emissions associated with WPD's operations. The cost of these allowances is not significant and is included in WPD's current operating expenses.


213




 
The EPA's Rules under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act

As further described below,There continues to be uncertainty around the EPA's regulation of existing coal-fired power plants. In 2015 the EPA had finalized rules imposing GHG emission standards for both new and existing power plants. The EPA has also issuedplants and had proposed a proposed federal implementation plan that would apply to any states that failfailed to submit an acceptable state implementation plan under these rules. The EPA's authority to promulgate these regulations under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act has been challenged in the D.C. Circuit Court by several states and industry groups. On February 9, 2016, the Supreme Court stayed the rule for existing plantsreduce GHG emissions on a state-by-state basis (the Clean Power Plan) pending the D.C. Circuit Court's review and subsequent review by the Supreme Court if a writ of certiorari is filed and granted.2015 EPA Rules).

The EPA's rule for new power plants imposes separate emission standards for coal and natural gas units based on the application of different technologies. The coal standard is based on the application of partial carbon capture and sequestration technology, but because this technology is not presently commercially viable, the rule effectively precludes the construction of new coal-fired plants. The standard for NGCC power plants is the same as the EPA proposed in 2012 and is not continuously achievable. The preclusion of new coal-fired plants and the compliance difficulties posed for new natural gas-fired plants could have a significant industry-wide impact.
The EPA's Clean Power Plan
The EPA's rule for existing power plants, referred to as the Clean Power Plan, was published in the Federal Register in October 2015. The Clean Power Plan contains state-specific rate-based and mass-based reduction goals and guidelines for the development, submission and implementation of state implementation plans to achieve the state goals. State-specific goals were calculated from 2012 data by applying the EPA's broad interpretation and definition of the BSER, resulting in the most stringent targets to be met in 2030, with interim targets to be met beginning in 2022. The EPA believes it has offered some flexibility to the states as to how their compliance plans can be crafted, including the option to use a rate-based approach (limit emissions per megawatt hour) or a mass-based approach (limit total tons of emissions per year), and the option to demonstrate compliance through emissions trading and multi-state collaborations. Under the rate-based approach, Kentucky would need to make a 41% reduction from its 2012 emissions rate and under a mass-based approach it would need to make a 36% reduction. These reductions are significantly greater than initially proposed and present significantFollowing legal challenges to the state. If the Clean Power Plan is ultimately upheld and Kentucky fails to develop an approvable implementation plan2015 EPA Rules, a stay of those rules by the applicable deadline, the EPA may impose a federal implementation plan that could be more stringent than what the state plan might provide. Depending on the provisions of the Kentucky implementation plan, LG&E and KU may need to modify their current portfolio of generating assets during the next decade and/or participate in an allowance trading program.
LG&E and KU are monitoring developments at the state and federal level. Various states, industry groups and individual companies including LKE have filed petitions for reconsideration with EPA and petitions for review with the D.C. Circuit Court challenging the Clean Power Plan. In February 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court, stayedand the rule pendingPresident's March 2017 Executive Order (requiring the D.C. Circuit Court's review. A ruling from the D.C. Circuit Court is expected in 2017. The new U.S. presidential administration has expressed an intentionEPA to review the Clean Power Plan2015 EPA Rules), however, in October 2017, the EPA proposed to rescind the 2015 EPA Rules and related regulatory developments to determine if changes are warranted. PPL, LKE, LG&Ein December 2017, released an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking for a replacement rule (Replacement Rules) which contemplates GHG reductions based on "inside the fence" measures implemented at individual plants. The contemplated approach in the Replacement Rules is a more limited approach than that taken in the 2015 EPA Rules which had included assumed increased levels of fuel switching and KU cannot predictrenewable energy in determining the outcomelevel of emission reduction required by each state. At present, the pending litigation, any changes in regulations, interpretations, or litigation positions that may be implemented by2015 EPA Rules remain stayed and the new U.S. presidential administration or the potential impact, if any, on plant operations, or future capital or operating costs. PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU believe that the costs, which could be significant, would be subject to cost recovery.Replacement Rules have not yet been published.
 
In April 2014, the Kentucky General Assembly passed legislation limiting the measures that the Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet may consider in setting performance standards to comply with the EPA's regulations governing GHG emissions from existing sources,2015 EPA Rules, if enacted. The legislation provides that such state GHG performance standards shallwill be based on emission reductions, efficiency measures and other improvements available at each power plant, rather than renewable


energy, end-use energy efficiency, fuel switching and re-dispatch. These statutory restrictions are consistent with the EPA's notice of proposed rulemaking on the Replacement Rules.

LG&E and KU are monitoring developments at the state and federal level. Until there is more clarity about the potential requirements that may make it more difficult for Kentucky to achievebe imposed under the GHG reduction levelsReplacement Rules and Kentucky's implementation plan, PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU cannot predict the potential impact, if any, on plant operations, future capital or operating costs. PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU believe that the EPA has established for Kentucky, if enacted.costs, which could be significant, would be subject to rate recovery.

Sulfuric Acid Mist Emissions (PPL, LKE and LG&E)

In June 2016, the EPA issued a notice of violation under the Clean Air Act alleging that LG&E violated applicable rules relating to sulfuric acid mist emissions at its Mill Creek plant. The notice alleges failure to install proper controls, failure to operate the facility consistent with good air pollution control practice, and causing emissions exceeding applicable requirements or constituting a nuisance or endangerment. LG&E believes it has complied with applicable regulations during the relevant time period. DiscussionDiscussions between the EPA and LG&E are ongoing. The parties have entered into a tolling agreement with respect to this matter through December 2018. PPL, LKE and LG&E are unable to predict the outcome of this matter or the potential impact on operations of the Mill Creek plant, including increased capital or operating costs, and potential civil penalties or remedial measures, if any.

Water/Waste

(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
 
Coal Combustion Residuals (CCRs)CCRs
 
In April 2015, the EPA published its final rule regulating CCRs. CCRs include fly ash, bottom ash and sulfur dioxide scrubber wastes. The rule became effective in October 2015. It imposes extensive new requirements, including location restrictions, design and operating standards, groundwater monitoring and corrective action requirements, and closure and post-closure care requirements on CCR impoundments and landfills that are located on active power plants in the United States and not closed. Under the rule, CCRs are regulated as non-hazardous under Subtitle D of RCRA and beneficial use of CCRs is allowed, with some restrictions. The rule's requirements for covered CCR impoundments and landfills include implementation of groundwater monitoring and commencement or completion of closure activities generally between three and ten years from certain triggering events. The rule requires posting of compliance documentation on a publicly accessible website. Industry groups, environmental groups, individual companies and others have filed legal challenges to the final rule, which are pending before the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. The EPA has advised the court that it expects to reconsider certain aspects of the CCR Rule in the near future.

Recently enacted

214




In January 2017, Kentucky issued a new state rule relating to CCR matters, effective May 2017, aimed at reflecting the requirements of the federal CCR Rule. In May 2017, a resident adjacent to LG&E's and KU's Trimble County plant filed a lawsuit in Franklin County, Kentucky Circuit Court against the Kentucky Energy and Environmental Cabinet and LG&E seeking to invalidate the new rule. On January 31, 2018, the state court issued an opinion invalidating certain elements of the new rule. PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU cannot predict the ultimate outcome of the litigation. LG&E and KU presently operate their Trimble County facilities under continuing permits authorized via the former program and do not currently anticipate material impacts as a result of the challenge to the new rule. Separately, in December 2016, federal legislation haswas enacted that authorized the EPA to approve equally protective state programs that would operate in lieu of the CCR Rule. The Kentucky has proposed a state rule aimed at reflectingEnergy and Environmental Cabinet indicated it may propose rules under such authority in the requirements of the federal rule.future.

LG&E and KU have received KPSC approval for a compliance plan providing for construction of additional landfill capacity at the E.W. Brown station, closure of impoundments at the Mill Creek, Trimble County, E.W. Brown, and Ghent stations, and construction of process water management facilities at those plants. In addition to the foregoing measures required for compliance with federal CCR rule requirements, LG&E and KU also received KPSC approval for theirits plans to close impoundments at the retired Green River, Pineville and Tyrone plants to comply with applicable state law requirements. See Note 6 for additional information.
 
In connection with the final CCR rule, LG&E and KU recorded adjustments to existing AROs during 2015, 2016 and 2016.2017. See Note 19 for additional information. Further changes to AROs, current capital plans or operating costs may be required as estimates are refined based on closure developments, groundwater monitoring results, and regulatory or legal proceedings. Costs relating to this rule are subject to rate recovery.
 
Clean Water Act
 
Regulations under the federal Clean Water Act dictate permitting and mitigation requirements for facilities and construction projects in the United States. Many of those requirements relate to power plant operations, including requirements related to the treatment of pollutants in effluents prior to discharge, the temperature of effluent discharges and the location, design and construction of cooling water intake structures at generating facilities, standards intended to protect aquatic organisms that become trapped at or pulled through cooling water intake structures at generating facilities. The requirements could impose significant costs for LG&E and KU, which are subject to rate recovery.

Effluent Limitations Guidelines (ELGs)ELGs
 
In September 2015, the EPA released its final ELGs for wastewater discharge permits for new and existing steam electric generating facilities. The rule provides strict technology-based discharge limitations for control of pollutants in scrubber wastewater, fly ash and bottom ash transport water, mercury control wastewater, gasification wastewater and combustion


residual leachate. The new guidelines require deployment of additional control technologies providing physical, chemical and biological treatment of wastewaters. The guidelines also mandate operational changes including "no discharge" requirements for fly ash and bottom ash transport waters and mercury control wastewaters. The implementation date for individual generating stations will be determined by the states on a case-by-case basis according to criteria provided by the EPA, but the requirements of the rule must be fully implemented no later than 2023.EPA. Industry groups, environmental groups, individual companies and others have filed legal challenges to the final rule, which have been consolidated before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. In April 2017, the EPA announced that it would grant petitions for reconsideration of the rule. In September 2017, the EPA published in the Federal Register a proposed rule that would postpone the compliance date for requirements relating to bottom ash transport waters and scrubber wastewaters discharge limits. The EPA expects to complete its reconsideration of best available technology standards by the fall of 2020. Upon completion of the ongoing regulatory proceedings, the rule will be implemented by the states in the course of their normal permitting activities. LG&E and KU are developing compliance strategies and schedules. PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU are unable to predict the outcome of the EPA's pending reconsideration of the rule or fully estimate compliance costs or timing at this time, althoughtiming. Additionally, certain preliminaryaspects of these compliance plans and estimates relate to developments in state water quality standards, which are included in current capital forecasts for applicable periods.separate from the ELG rule or its implementation. Costs to comply with ELGs or other discharge limits, which are expected to be significant, are subject to rate recovery.
 
Clean Water Act Section 316(b)
The EPA's final 316(b) rule for existing facilities became effective in October 2014, and regulates cooling water intake structures and their impact on aquatic organisms. The rule requires existing facilities to choose among several options to reduce the impact on aquatic organisms that become trapped against water intake screens (impingement) and to determine the intake structure's impact on aquatic organisms pulled through a plant's cooling water system (entrainment). Based on studies conducted by LG&E and KU to date, all plants will incur only insignificant operational costs. In addition, LG&E's Mill Creek Unit 1 is expected to incur capital costs. PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU do not expect compliance costs, which are subject to rate recovery, to be significant.

Seepages and Groundwater Infiltration
 
Seepages or groundwater infiltration have been detected at active and retired wastewater basins and landfills at various LG&E orand KU plants. LG&E and KU have completed, or are completing, assessments of seepages or groundwater infiltration at various facilities and have completed, or are working with agencies to implement, further testing, monitoring or abatement measures, where applicable. A range of reasonablereasonably possible lossescosts cannot currently be estimated. Depending on the circumstances in each case, certain costs, which may be subject to rate recovery, could be significant.


215




 
(All Registrants)
Waters of the United States (WOTUS)
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has issued a stay of the EPA's rule on the definition of WOTUS pending the court's review of the rule. The effect of the stay is that the WOTUS rule is not in effect anywhere. The ultimate outcome of the court's review of the rule remains uncertain. Because of the strict permitting programs already in place in Kentucky and Pennsylvania, the Registrants do not expect the rule to have a significant impact on their operations.
 
Other Issues
 
OnIn June 22, 2016, the "Frank Lautenberg Chemical Safety Act" took effect as an amendment to the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA). The Act made no changes to the pre-existing TSCA rules as it pertains to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB). The EPA continues to reassess its PCB regulations as part of the 2010 Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM). The EPA's ANPRM rulemaking is to occur in two phases. The first,Only the second part of the rule, currently scheduled for MarchNovember 2017, relatesis applicable to PPL operations. This part of the use of PCBs in small capacitors and fluorescent ballasts in schools and day care centers. The second, scheduled for October 2017,rule relates to the use of PCBs in electrical equipment and natural gas pipelines, as well as continued use of PCB-contaminated porous surfaces. Although the first rulemaking will not directly affect the Registrants' operations, it may indicate certain approaches or principles to occur in the later rulemaking which may affect Registrants' facilities in the United States, including phase-out of some or all equipment containing PCBs. Should such a phase-out be required, the costs, which are subject to rate recovery, could be significant.
 
Superfund and Other Remediation

PPL Electric is potentially responsible for a share of the costs at several sites listed by the EPA under the federal Superfund program, including the Columbia Gas Plant site and the Brodhead site. Clean-up actions have been or are being undertaken at all of these sites, the costs of which have not been, and are not expected to be, significant to PPL Electric.



PPL Electric, LG&E and KU are investigating, responding to agency inquiries, taking various measures, remediating, or have completed the remediation of, for several sites that were not addressed under a regulatory program such as Superfund, but for which PPL Electric, LG&E and KU may be liable for remediation. These include a number of former coal gas manufacturing plants in Pennsylvania and Kentucky previously owned or operated or currently owned by predecessors or affiliates of PPL Electric, LG&E and KU. To date, the costs of these sites have not been significant.

There are additional sites, formerly owned or operated by PPL Electric, LG&E and KU predecessors or affiliates. PPL Electric, LG&E and KU lack sufficient information on the condition of such additional sites and are therefore unable to estimate any potential liability they may have or a range of reasonably possible losses, if any, related to these matters.

At December 31, 2016,2017, PPL Electric had a recorded liability of $10 million representing its best estimate of the probable loss incurred to remediate the sites noted above. Depending on the outcome of investigations at sites where investigations have not begun or been completed, or developments at sites for which information is incomplete, additional costs of remediation could be incurred; however, such costs are not expected to be significant.
 
The EPA is evaluating the risks associated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and naphthalene, chemical by-products of coal gas manufacturing. As a result of the EPA's evaluation, individual states may establish stricter standards for water quality and soil cleanup. This could require several PPL subsidiaries to take more extensive assessment and remedial actions at former coal gas manufacturing plants. PPL, PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU cannot estimate a range of reasonably possible losses, if any, related to these matters.

From time to time, PPL's subsidiaries in the United States undertake testing, monitoring or remedial action in response to notices of violations, spills or other releases at various on-site and off-site locations, negotiate with the EPA and state and local agencies regarding actions necessary for compliance with applicable requirements, negotiate with property owners and other third parties alleging impacts from PPL's operations and undertake similar actions necessary to resolve environmental matters that arise in the course of normal operations. Based on analyses to date, resolution of these environmental matters is not expected to have a significant adverse impact on the operations of PPL Electric, LG&E and KU.
 
Future cleanup or remediation work at sites under review, or at sites not yet identified, may result in significant additional costs for PPL, PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU. Insurance policies maintained by LKE, LG&E and KU may be applicable to certain of the costs or other obligations related to these matters but the amount of insurance coverage or reimbursement cannot be estimated or assured.

European Union Creosote Ban(PPL)

216




Other

(All Registrants)

Labor Union Agreements

For (PPL and PPL Electric,Electric)

In March 2017, members of the IBEW ratified a new five-year labor agreement negotiations with PPL. The contract covers nearly 1,400 employees and was effective May 22, 2017. The terms of the new labor agreement are not expected to have a significant impact on the financial results of PPL or PPL Electric.

(LKE and KU)

In August 2017, KU and the United Steelworkers of America ratified a three-year labor agreement through August 2020. The agreement covers approximately 54 employees. The terms of the new labor agreement do not have a significant impact on the financial results of LKE or KU.

(LKE and LG&E)

In November 2017, LG&E and the IBEW commenced in February 2017. The current three-year agreement expires in May 2017.

LG&E and KU haveratified a three-year labor agreements withagreement through November 2020. The agreement covers approximately 671 employees. The terms of the IBEW, which expire in November 2017 and August 2018. The KU IBEWnew labor agreement includesdo not have a wage reopener in 2017. KU has 54 employees that are represented by a USWA labor union, under an agreement that expires in August 2017.



At December 31, 2016, the expiring labor agreements covered the following.

   
Number of Union
Employees
 
Percentage of Total
Workforce
PPL   2,173
 17%
PPL Electric  1,150
 63%
LKE  819
 23%
LG&E  696
 68%
KU  123
 13%
LKE or LG&E.

The Registrants cannot predict the outcome of thefuture union labor negotiations.

Guarantees and Other Assurances
 
(All Registrants)
 
In the normal course of business, the Registrants enter into agreements that provide financial performance assurance to third parties on behalf of certain subsidiaries. Such agreements include, for example, guarantees, stand-by letters of credit issued by financial institutions and surety bonds issued by insurance companies. These agreements are entered into primarily to support or enhance the creditworthiness attributed to a subsidiary on a stand-alone basis or to facilitate the commercial activities in which these subsidiaries engage.
 
(PPL)
 
PPL fully and unconditionally guarantees all of the debt securities of PPL Capital Funding.
 
(All Registrants)
 
The table below details guarantees provided as of December 31, 2016.2017. "Exposure" represents the estimated maximum potential amount of future payments that could be required to be made under the guarantee. The probability of expected payment/performance under each of these guarantees is remote except for "WPD guarantee of pension and other obligations of unconsolidated entities" and "Indemnification of lease termination and other divestitures." The total recorded liability at December 31, 2017 was $17 million for PPL and $11 million for LKE. The $11 million recorded at LKE represents the settlement amount related to WKE's excess power matter. See footnote (e) for additional information. The total recorded liability at December 31, 2016 was $22 million for PPL and $17 million for LKE. The total recorded liability at December 31, 2015 was $25 million for PPL and $18 million for LKE. For reporting purposes, on a consolidated basis, all guarantees of PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU also apply to PPL, and all guarantees of LG&E and KU also apply to LKE.


217




Exposure at
December 31, 2016
 
Expiration
Date
Exposure at
December 31, 2017
 
Expiration
Date
PPL    
Indemnifications related to the WPD Midlands acquisition 
(a)  
(a) 
WPD indemnifications for entities in liquidation and sales of assets$10
(b)2019$11
(b)2020
WPD guarantee of pension and other obligations of unconsolidated entities104
(c) 95
(c) 
PPL Electric      
Guarantee of inventory value14
(d)201816
(d)2018
LKE      
Indemnification of lease termination and other divestitures301
(e)2021 - 2023201
(e)2021-2023
LG&E and KU      
LG&E and KU guarantee of shortfall related to OVEC 
(f)  
(f) 

(a)
Indemnifications related to certain liabilities, including a specific unresolved tax issue and those relating to properties and assets owned by the seller that were transferred to WPD Midlands in connection with the acquisition. A cross indemnity has been received from the seller on the tax issue. The maximum exposure and expiration of these indemnifications cannot be estimated because the maximum potential liability is not capped and the expiration date is not specified in the transaction documents.
(b)
Indemnification to the liquidators and certain others for existing liabilities or expenses or liabilities arising during the liquidation process. The indemnifications are limited to distributions made from the subsidiary to its parent either prior or subsequent to liquidation or are not explicitly stated in the agreements. The indemnifications generally expire two to seven years subsequent to the date of dissolution of the entities. The exposure noted only includes those cases where the agreements provide for specific limits.

In connection with their sales of various businesses, WPD and its affiliates have provided the purchasers with indemnifications that are standard for such transactions, including indemnifications for certain pre-existing liabilities and environmental and tax matters or have agreed to continue their obligations


under existing third-party guarantees, either for a set period of time following the transactions or upon the condition that the purchasers make reasonable efforts to terminate the guarantees. Additionally, WPD and its affiliates remain secondarily responsible for lease payments under certain leases that they have assigned to third parties.
(c)
Relates to certain obligations of discontinued or modified electric associations that were guaranteed at the time of privatization by the participating members. Costs are allocated to the members and can be reallocated if an existing member becomes insolvent. At December 31, 2016,2017, WPD has recorded an estimated discounted liability for which the expected payment/performance is probable. Neither the expiration date nor the maximum amount of potential payments for certain obligations is explicitly stated in the related agreements, and as a result, the exposure has been estimated.
(d)A third party logistics firm provides inventory procurement and fulfillment services. The logistics firm has title to the inventory, however, upon termination of the contracts, PPL Electric has guaranteed to purchase any remaining inventory that has not been used or sold. In January 2018, this agreement was superseded by a new contract which extends the guarantee until 2020.
(e)
LKE provides certain indemnifications covering the due and punctual payment, performance and discharge by each party of its respective obligations. The most comprehensive of these guarantees is the LKE guarantee covering operational, regulatory and environmental commitments and indemnifications made by WKE under a 2009 Transaction Termination Agreement. This guarantee has a term of 12 years ending July 2021, and a maximum exposure of $200$200 million, exclusive of certain items such as government fines and penalties that may exceed the maximum. Another WKE-related LKE guarantee coversformerly covered other indemnifications related to the purchase price of excess power, hashad a term expiring in 2023, and a maximum exposure of $100 million. In May 2012, LKE's indemnitee received an unfavorable arbitration panel's decision interpreting this matter. In October 2014, LKE's indemnitee filed a motion for discretionary review with the Kentucky Supreme Court seeking to overturn the arbitration decision,$100 million, which excess power matter and such motion was denied by the court in September 2015. In September 2015, the counterparty issued a demand letter to LKE's indemnitee. In February 2016, the counterparty filed a complaint in Henderson, Kentucky Circuit Court, seeking an award of damages in the matter. The proceeding is currently in the discovery phase. LKE does not believe appropriate contractual, legal or commercial grounds exist for the claim made. LKE believes its indemnification obligations in the WKE matter remain subject to various uncertainties, including additional legal and contractual developments, as well as future prices, availability and demand forrelated indemnifications had been the subject excess power. Althoughof a dispute and legal proceeding among the parties. In December 2017, the parties have also conducted certainexecuted settlement discussions,agreements which resolved all claims relating to the ultimate outcomes of the WKE termination-related indemnifications cannot be predicted at this time.excess power matter, and terminated such guarantee, for $11 million. Additionally, LKE has indemnified various third parties related to historical obligations for other divested subsidiaries and affiliates. The indemnifications vary by entity and the maximum exposures range from being capped at the sale price to no specified maximum. LKE could be required to perform on these indemnifications in the event of covered losses or liabilities being claimed by an indemnified party. LKE cannot predict the ultimate outcomes of the various indemnification scenarios, but does not expect such outcomes to result in significant losses above the amounts recorded.
(f)
Pursuant to the OVEC power purchase contract, LG&E and KU are obligated to pay for their share of OVEC's excess debt service, post-retirement and decommissioning costs, as well as any shortfall from amounts included within a demand charge designed and expected to cover these costs over the term of the contract. LKE's proportionate share of OVEC's outstanding debt was $123$117 million at December 31, 2016,2017, consisting of LG&E's share of $85$81 million and KU's share of $38 million. $36 million. The maximum exposure and the expiration date of these potential obligations are not presently determinable. See "Energy Purchase Commitments" above for additional information on the OVEC power purchase contract. In connection with recent credit market related developments at OVEC or certain of its sponsors, such parties, including LG&E and KU, have allowed implementation of a limited, partial OVEC reserve fund for debt costs and are analyzing certain potential additional credit support actions to preserve OVEC's access to credit markets or mitigate risks or adverse impacts relating thereto, including increased interest costs and accelerated maturities of OVEC's existing short and long-term debt. The ultimate outcome of these matters, including any potential impact on LG&E's and KU's obligations relating to OVEC debt under the power purchase contract cannot be predicted.

The Registrants provide other miscellaneous guarantees through contracts entered into in the normal course of business. These guarantees are primarily in the form of indemnification or warranties related to services or equipment and vary in duration. The amounts of these guarantees often are not explicitly stated, and the overall maximum amount of the obligation under such guarantees cannot be reasonably estimated. Historically, no significant payments have been made with respect to these types of guarantees and the probability of payment/performance under these guarantees is remote.
 
PPL, on behalf of itself and certain of its subsidiaries, maintains insurance that covers liability assumed under contract for bodily injury and property damage. The coverage provides maximum aggregate coverage of $225 million. This insurance may be applicable to obligations under certain of these contractual arrangements.


218




 
14. Related Party Transactions

PLR Contracts/Purchases of Accounts Receivable (PPL Electric)

PPL Electric holds competitive solicitations for PLR generation supply. PPL EnergyPlus was awarded a portion of the PLR generation supply through these competitive solicitations. The purchases from PPL EnergyPlus are included in PPL Electric's Statements of Income as "Energy purchases from affiliate" through May 31, 2015, the period through which PPL Electric and PPL EnergyPlus were affiliated entities. As a result of the June 1, 2015 spinoff of PPL Energy Supply and creation of Talen Energy, PPL EnergyPlus (renamed Talen Energy Marketing) is no longer an affiliate of PPL Electric. PPL Electric's purchases from Talen Energy Marketing subsequent to May 31, 2015 are included as purchases from an unaffiliated third party.
    
PPL Electric's customers may choose an alternative supplier for their generation supply. See Note 1 for additional information regarding PPL Electric's purchases of accounts receivable from alternative suppliers, including Talen Energy Marketing. See Note 8 for additional information regarding the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply.

Wholesale Sales and Purchases (LG&E and KU)
 
LG&E and KU jointly dispatch their generation units with the lowest cost generation used to serve their retail customers. When LG&E has excess generation capacity after serving its own retail customers and its generation cost is lower than that of KU, KU purchases electricity from LG&E. When KU has excess generation capacity after serving its own retail customers&E and its


generation cost is lower than that of LG&E, LG&E purchases electricity from KU.vice versa. These transactions are reflected in the Statements of Income as "Electric revenue from affiliate" and "Energy purchases from affiliate" and are recorded at a price equal to the seller's fuel cost plus any split savings. Savings realized from such intercompany transactions are shared equally between both companies. The volume of energy each company has to sell to the other is dependent on its retail customers' needs and its available generation.
 
Support Costs (PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU)
 
PPL Services, PPL EU Services and LKS provide their respective PPL, PPL Electric and LKE, their respective subsidiaries, including LG&E and KU, and each other with administrative, management and support services. For all service companies, the costs of these services are charged to the respective recipients as direct support costs. General costs that cannot be directly attributed to a specific entity are allocated and charged to the respective recipients as indirect support costs. PPL Services and PPL EU Services use a three-factor methodology that includes the applicable recipients' invested capital, operation and maintenance expenses and number of employees to allocate indirect costs. PPL Services may also use a ratio of overall direct and indirect costs. LKS bases its indirect allocations on the subsidiaries' number of employees, total assets, revenues, number of customers and/or other statistical information. PPL Services, PPL EU Services and LKS charged the following amounts for the years ended December 31, including amounts applied to accounts that are further distributed between capital and expense on the books of the recipients, based on methods that are believed to be reasonable.  
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
PPL Electric from PPL Services$132
 $125
 $151
$182
 $132
 $125
LKE from PPL Services18
 16
 15
20
 18
 16
PPL Electric from PPL EU Services69
 60
 
64
 69
 60
LG&E from LKS178
 155
 140
169
 178
 155
KU from LKS194
 185
 165
190
 194
 185
 
In addition to the charges for services noted above, LKS makes payments on behalf of LG&E and KU for fuel purchases and other costs for products or services provided by third parties. LG&E and KU also provide services to each other and to LKS. Billings between LG&E and KU relate to labor and overheads associated with union and hourly employees performing work for the other company, charges related to jointly-owned generating units and other miscellaneous charges. Tax settlements between LKE and LG&E and KU are reimbursed through LKS.
 
Intercompany Borrowings

(PPL Electric)

PPL Energy Funding maintains a $400 million revolving line of credit with a PPL Electric subsidiary. No balance was outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016. The interest rates on borrowings are equal to one-month LIBOR plus a spread. Interest income on the revolving line of credit was not significant for 2017, 2016 or 2015.


219





(LKE)
 
LKE maintains a $225 million revolving line of credit with a PPL Energy Funding subsidiary whereby LKE can borrow funds on a short-term basis at market-based rates. In December 2017, the revolving line of credit was increased by $50 million and the limit as of December 31, 2017 was $275 million. The interest rates on borrowings are equal to one-month LIBOR plus a spread. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, $225 million and 2015, $163 million and $54 million, respectively, were outstanding and reflected in "Notes payable with affiliates" on the Balance Sheets. The interest rate on the outstanding borrowings at December 31, 2017 and 2016 was 2.87% and 2015 was 2.12% and 1.74%. Interest expense on the revolving line of credit was not significant for 2017, 2016 2015 or 2014.2015.
 
LKE maintains an agreement with a PPL affiliate that has a $300 million borrowing limit whereby LKE can loan funds on a short-term basis at market-based rates. No balance was outstanding at December 31, 20162017 and 2015.2016. The interest rate on the
loan based on the PPL affiliate'saffiliates credit rating is currently equal to one-month LIBOR plus a spread. Interest income on this note was not significant for 2017, 2016 2015 or 2014.2015.
 
In November 2015, LKE entered intomaintains a $400 million ten-year-note with a PPL affiliate with an interest rate of 3.5%. The proceeds were used to repay the entire $400 million principal amount of its 2.125% Senior Unsecured Notes which matured in November 2015. At December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, the note was reflected in "Long-term debt to affiliate" on the Balance Sheets. Interest expense on this note was $14 million for 2017 and 2016 and not significant for 2015.

(LG&E)

LG&E participates in an intercompany money pool agreement whereby LKE and/or KU make available to LG&E funds up to $500 million at an interest rate based on a market index of commercial paper issues. No balances were outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016. Interest expense incurred on this notethe money pool agreement with KU was not significant for 2017 or 2016. There was no money pool activity with KU in 2015.

(KU)

KU participates in an intercompany money pool agreement whereby LKE and/or LG&E make available to KU funds up to $500 million at an interest rate based on a market index of commercial paper issues. No balances were outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016. Interest income incurred on the money pool agreement with LG&E was not significant for 2017 and 2016. There was no money pool activity with LG&E in 2015.
 
Intercompany Derivatives (LKE, LG&E and KU)
 
Periodically, LG&E and KU enter into forward-starting interest rate swaps with PPL. These hedging instruments have terms identical to forward-starting swaps entered into by PPL with third parties. See Note 17 for additional information on intercompany derivatives.
 


Other (PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU)
 
See Note 1 for discussions regarding the intercompany tax sharing agreement (for PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU) and intercompany allocations of stock-based compensation expense (for PPL Electric and LKE). For PPL Electric, LG&E and KU, see Note 11 for discussions regarding intercompany allocations associated with defined benefits.
 
15. Other Income (Expense) - net

(PPL)

The breakdown of "Other Income (Expense) - net" for the years ended December 31, was:


220




2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Other Income 
  
  
 
  
  
Economic foreign currency exchange contracts (Note 17)$384
 $122
 $121
$(261) $384
 $122
Interest income3
 4
 1
2
 3
 4
AFUDC - equity component19
 14
 11
16
 19
 14
Miscellaneous6
 6
 7
17
 6
 6
Total Other Income412
 146
 140
(226) 412
 146
Other Expense 
  
  
 
  
  
Charitable contributions9
 21
 27
8
 9
 21
Miscellaneous13
 17
 8
21
 13
 17
Total Other Expense22
 38
 35
29
 22
 38
Other Income (Expense) - net$390
 $108
 $105
$(255) $390
 $108
 
16. Fair Value Measurements
 
(All Registrants)
 
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). A market approach (generally, data from market transactions), an income approach (generally, present value techniques and option-pricing models), and/or a cost approach (generally, replacement cost) are used to measure the fair value of an asset or liability, as appropriate. These valuation approaches incorporate inputs such as observable, independent market data and/or unobservable data that management believes are predicated on the assumptions market participants would use to price an asset or liability. These inputs may incorporate, as applicable, certain risks such as nonperformance risk, which includes credit risk. The fair value of a group of financial assets and liabilities is measured on a net basis. Transfers between levels are recognized at end-of-reporting-period values. During 20162017 and 2015,2016, there were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2. See Note 1 for information on the levels in the fair value hierarchy.
 
Recurring Fair Value Measurements
 
The assets and liabilities measured at fair value were:
December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
PPL 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Assets                              
Cash and cash equivalents$341
 $341
 $
 $
 $836
 $836
 $
 $
$485
 $485
 $
 $
 $341
 $341
 $
 $
Restricted cash and cash equivalents (a)26
 26
 
 
 33
 33
 
 
26
 26
 
 
 26
 26
 
 
Price risk management assets (b): 
  
  
  
    
  
  
 
  
  
  
    
  
  
Foreign currency contracts211
 
 211
 
 209
 
 209
 
163
 
 163
 
 211
 
 211
 
Cross-currency swaps188
 
 188
 
 86
 
 86
 
101
 
 101
 
 188
 
 188
 
Total price risk management assets399
 
 399
 
 295
 
 295
 
264
 
 264
 
 399
 
 399
 
Auction rate securities (c)
 
 
 
 2
 
 
 2
Total assets$766
 $367
 $399
 $
 $1,166
 $869
 $295
 $2
$775
 $511
 $264
 $
 $766
 $367
 $399
 $
                              


221




December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Liabilities 
    
  
    
  
  
 
    
  
    
  
  
Price risk management liabilities (b): 
  
  
  
    
  
  
 
  
  
  
    
  
  
Interest rate swaps$31
 $
 $31
 $
 $71
 $
 $71
 $
$26
 $
 $26
 $
 $31
 $
 $31
 $
Foreign currency contracts27
 
 27
 
 1
 
 1
 
148
 
 148
 
 27
 
 27
 
Total price risk management liabilities$58
 $
 $58
 $
 $72
 $
 $72
 $
$174
 $
 $174
 $
 $58
 $
 $58
 $
                              
PPL Electric 
  
  
  
    
  
  
 
  
  
  
    
  
  
Assets 
  
  
  
    
  
  
 
  
  
  
    
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents$13
 $13
 $
 $
 $47
 $47
 $
 $
$49
 $49
 $
 $
 $13
 $13
 $
 $
Restricted cash and cash equivalents (a)2
 2
 
 
 2
 2
 
 
2
 2
 
 
 2
 2
 
 
Total assets$15
 $15
 $
 $
 $49
 $49
 $
 $
$51
 $51
 $
 $
 $15
 $15
 $
 $
                              
LKE 
  
  
  
    
  
  
 
  
  
  
    
  
  
Assets                              
Cash and cash equivalents $13
 $13
 $
 $
 $30
 $30
 $
 $
$30
 $30
 $
 $
 $13
 $13
 $
 $
Cash collateral posted to counterparties (d)(c)3
 3
 
 
 9
 9
 
 

 
 
 
 3
 3
 
 
Total assets$16
 $16
 $
 $
 $39
 $39
 $
 $
$30
 $30
 $
 $
 $16
 $16
 $
 $
                              
Liabilities 
  
  
  
    
  
  
 
  
  
  
    
  
  
Price risk management liabilities: 
  
  
  
    
  
  
 
  
  
  
    
  
  
Interest rate swaps$31
 $
 $31
 $
 $47
 $
 $47
 $
$26
 $
 $26
 $
 $31
 $
 $31
 $
Total price risk management liabilities$31
 $
 $31
 $
 $47
 $
 $47
 $
$26
 $
 $26
 $
 $31
 $
 $31
 $
                              
LG&E 
  
  
  
    
  
  
 
  
  
  
    
  
  
Assets 
  
  
  
    
  
  
 
  
  
  
    
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents$5
 $5
 $
 $
 $19
 $19
 $
 $
$15
 $15
 $
 $
 $5
 $5
 $
 $
Cash collateral posted to counterparties (d)(c)3
 3
 
 
 9
 9
 
 

 
 
 
 3
 3
 
 
Total assets$8
 $8
 $
 $
 $28
 $28
 $
 $
$15
 $15
 $
 $
 $8
 $8
 $
 $
                              
Liabilities 
  
  
  
    
  
  
 
  
  
  
    
  
  
Price risk management liabilities: 
  
  
  
    
  
  
 
  
  
  
    
  
  
Interest rate swaps$31
 $
 $31
 $
 $47
 $
 $47
 $
$26
 $
 $26
 $
 $31
 $
 $31
 $
Total price risk management liabilities$31
 $
 $31
 $
 $47
 $
 $47
 $
$26
 $
 $26
 $
 $31
 $
 $31
 $
                              
KU 
  
  
  
    
  
  
 
  
  
  
    
  
  
Assets 
  
  
  
    
  
  
 
  
  
  
    
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents$7
 $7
 $
 $
 $11
 $11
 $
 $
$15
 $15
 $
 $
 $7
 $7
 $
 $
Total assets$7
 $7
 $
 $
 $11
 $11
 $
 $
$15
 $15
 $
 $
 $7
 $7
 $
 $
 
(a)Current portion is included in "Other current assets" and long-term portion is included in "Other noncurrent assets" on the Balance Sheets.
(b)Current portion is included in "Price risk management assets" and "Other current liabilities" and noncurrent portion is included in "Price risk management assets" and "Other deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities" on the Balance Sheets.
(c)Included in "Other current assets" on the Balance Sheets.
(d)Included in "Other noncurrent assets" on the Balance Sheets. Represents cash collateral posted to offset the exposure with counterparties related to certain interest rate swaps under master netting arrangements that are not offset.

Price Risk Management Assets/Liabilities - Interest Rate Swaps/Foreign Currency Contracts/Cross-Currency Swaps (PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
 
To manage interest rate risk, PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU use interest rate contracts such as forward-starting swaps, floating-to-fixed swaps and fixed-to-floating swaps. To manage foreign currency exchange risk, PPL uses foreign currency contracts such as forwards, options, and cross-currency swaps that contain characteristics of both interest rate and foreign currency contracts. An income approach is used to measure the fair value of these contracts, utilizing readily observable inputs, such as forward interest rates (e.g., LIBOR and government security rates) and forward foreign currency exchange rates (e.g., GBP), as well as inputs that may not be observable, such as credit valuation adjustments. In certain cases, market information cannot practicably be obtained to value credit risk and therefore internal models are relied upon. These models use projected probabilities of


default and estimated recovery rates based on historical observances. When the credit valuation adjustment is significant to the overall valuation, the contracts are classified as Level 3.


222




 
Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements (PPL)
 
See Note 8 for information regarding the estimated fair value of the Supply segment's net assets as of the June 1, 2015 spinoff date.
 
Financial Instruments Not Recorded at Fair Value (All Registrants)
 
The carrying amounts of long-term debt on the Balance Sheets and their estimated fair values are set forth below. The fair values were estimated using an income approach by discounting future cash flows at estimated current cost of funding rates, which incorporate the credit risk of the Registrants. Long-term debt is classified as Level 2. The effect of third-party credit enhancements is not included in the fair value measurement.
December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Carrying
Amount
 Fair Value Carrying
Amount
 Fair ValueCarrying
Amount (a)
 Fair Value Carrying
Amount (a)
 Fair Value
PPL$18,326
 $21,355
 $19,048
 $21,218
$20,195
 $23,783
 $18,326
 $21,355
PPL Electric2,831
 3,148
 2,828
 3,088
3,298
 3,769
 2,831
 3,148
LKE5,065
 5,439
 5,088
 5,384
5,159
 5,670
 5,065
 5,439
LG&E1,617
 1,710
 1,642
 1,704
1,709
 1,865
 1,617
 1,710
KU2,327
 2,514
 2,326
 2,467
2,328
 2,605
 2,327
 2,514

(a)Amounts are net of debt issuance costs.

The carrying amounts of other current financial instruments (except for long-term debt due within one year) approximate their fair values because of their short-term nature.
 
17. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
 
Risk Management Objectives
 
(All Registrants)
 
PPL has a risk management policy approved by the Board of Directors to manage market risk associated with commodities, interest rates on debt issuances and foreign exchange (including price, liquidity and volumetric risk) and credit risk (including non-performance risk and payment default risk). The Risk Management Committee, comprised of senior management and chaired by the Senior Director-Risk Management, oversees the risk management function. Key risk control activities designed to ensure compliance with the risk policy and detailed programs include, but are not limited to, credit review and approval, validation of transactions, verification of risk and transaction limits, value-at-risk analyses (VaR, a statistical model that attempts to estimate the value of potential loss over a given holding period under normal market conditions at a given confidence level) and the coordination and reporting of the Enterprise Risk Management program.
 
Market Risk
 
Market risk includes the potential loss that may be incurred as a result of price changes associated with a particular financial or commodity instrument as well as market liquidity and volumetric risks. Forward contracts, futures contracts, options, swaps and structured transactions are utilized as part of risk management strategies to minimize unanticipated fluctuations in earnings caused by changes in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. Many of thethese contracts meet the definition of a derivative. All derivatives are recognized on the Balance Sheets at their fair value, unless NPNS is elected.
 
The following summarizes the market risks that affect PPL and its subsidiaries.
 
Interest rate riskRate Risk
 
PPL and its subsidiaries are exposed to interest rate risk associated with forecasted fixed-rate and existing floating-rate debt issuances. PPL and WPD hold over-the-counter cross currency swaps to limit exposure to market fluctuations on interest and principal payments from changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. PPL, LKE and LG&E utilize over-the-counter interest rate swaps to limit exposure to market fluctuations on floating-rate debt. PPL, LKE, LG&E and


223




and KU utilize forward starting interest rate swaps to hedge changes in benchmark interest rates, when appropriate, in connection with future debt issuances.
PPL and its subsidiaries are exposed to interest rate risk associated with debt securities and derivatives held by defined benefit plans. This risk is significantly mitigated to the extent that the plans are sponsored at, or sponsored on behalf of, the regulated domestic utilities and for certain plans at WPD due to the recovery mechanismsmethods in place.

Foreign currency riskCurrency Risk (PPL)
 
PPL is exposed to foreign currency exchange risk primarily associated with its investments in and earnings of U.K. affiliates.

(All Registrants)

Commodity price riskPrice Risk
 
PPL is exposed to commodity price risk through its domestic subsidiaries as described below.

PPL Electric is exposedrequired to purchase electricity to fulfill its obligation as a PLR. Potential commodity price risk from its obligation as PLR; however,is mitigated through its PUC-approved cost recovery mechanism substantially eliminates its exposure to this risk. PPL Electric also mitigates its exposure to commodity price risk by entering intoand full-requirement supply agreements to serve its PLR customers. These supply agreementscustomers which transfer the commodity price risk associated with the PLR obligation to the energy suppliers.
LG&E's and KU's rates include certain mechanisms for fuel, fuel-related expenses and fuel-related expenses.energy purchases. In addition, LG&E's rates include a mechanism for natural gas supply expenses. These mechanisms generally provide for timely recovery of market price fluctuations associated with these expenses.

Volumetric riskRisk

PPL is exposed to volumetric risk through its subsidiaries as described below.

WPD is exposed to volumetric risk which is significantly mitigated as a result of the method of regulation in the U.K. Under the RIIO-ED1 price control period,regulations, recovery of such exposure occurs on a two year lag. See Note 1 for additional information on revenue recognition under RIIO-ED1.
PPL Electric, LG&E and KU are exposed to volumetric risk on retail sales, mainly due to weather and other economic conditions for which there is limited mitigation between rate cases.

Equity securities price riskSecurities Price Risk
 
PPL and its subsidiaries are exposed to equity securities price risk associated with the fair value of the defined benefit plans.plans' assets. This risk is significantly mitigated at the regulated domestic utilities and for certain plans at WPD due to the recovery mechanismsmethods in place.
PPL is exposed to equity securities price risk from future stock sales and/or purchases.

Credit Risk
 
Credit risk is the potential loss that may be incurred due to a counterparty's non-performance.
 
PPL is exposed to credit risk from "in-the-money" interest rate and foreign currency derivatives with financial institutions, as well as additional credit risk through certain of its subsidiaries, as discussed below.
 
In the event a supplier of LKE (through its subsidiariesPPL Electric, LG&E and KU) or PPL ElectricKU defaults on its obligation, those entitiesRegistrants would be required to seek replacement power or replacement fuel in the market. In general, subject to regulatory review or other processes, appropriate incremental costs incurred by these entities would be recoverable from customers through applicable rate mechanisms, thusthereby mitigating the financial risk for these entities.

PPL and its subsidiaries have credit policies in place to manage credit risk, including the use of an established credit approval process, daily monitoring of counterparty positions and the use of master netting agreements or provisions. These agreements generally include credit mitigation provisions, such as margin, prepayment or collateral requirements. PPL and its subsidiaries may request additional credit assurance, in certain circumstances, in the event that the counterparties' credit ratings fall below investment grade, their tangible net worth falls below specified percentages or their exposures exceed an established credit limit.


224




Master Netting Arrangements(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
 
Net derivative positions on the balance sheets are not offset against the right to reclaim cash collateral (a receivable) or the obligation to return cash collateral (a payable) under master netting arrangements.
 
PPL had a $20 million and $19 million obligation to return cash collateral under master netting arrangements at December 31, 20162017 and no obligation to return cash collateral at December 31, 2015.2016.

LKE, LG&E and KU had no obligation to return cash collateral under master netting arrangements at December 31, 20162017 and 2015.2016.
 
PPL, LKE, and LG&E had no cash collateral posted under master netting arrangements at December 31, 2017. PPL, LKE and LG&E posted $3 million and $9 million of cash collateral under master netting arrangements at December 31, 2016 and 2015.2016.
 
KU did not post any cash collateral under master netting arrangements at December 31, 20162017 and 2015.2016.
 
See "Offsetting Derivative Instruments" below for a summary of derivative positions presented in the balance sheets where a right of setoff exists under these arrangements.
 
Interest Rate Risk
 
(All Registrants)
 
PPL and its subsidiaries issue debt to finance their operations, which exposes them to interest rate risk. VariousA variety of financial derivative instruments are utilized to adjust the mix of fixed and floating interest rates in their debt portfolio,portfolios, adjust the duration of the debt portfolioportfolios and lock in benchmark interest rates in anticipation of future financing, when appropriate. Risk limits under PPL's risk management program are designed to balance risk exposure to volatility in interest expense and changes in the fair value of the debt portfolio due to changes in benchmark interest rates. In addition, the interest rate risk of certain subsidiaries is potentially mitigated as a result of the existing regulatory framework or the timing of rate cases.
 
Cash Flow Hedges
(PPL)
 
Interest rate risks include exposure to adverse interest rate movements for outstanding variable rate debt and for future anticipated financings. Financial interest rate swap contracts that qualify as cash flow hedges may be entered into to hedge floating interest rate risk associated with both existing and anticipated debt issuances. PPL held no such contracts at December 31, 2016.2017.

For 2017, PPL had no hedge ineffectiveness associated with interest rate derivatives. For 2016 2015 and 2014,2015, hedge ineffectiveness associated with interest rate derivatives was insignificant.

At December 31, 2016,2017, PPL held an aggregate notional value in cross-currency interest rate swap contracts of $802$702 million that range in maturity from 20172021 through 2028 to hedge the interest payments and principal of WPD's U.S. dollar-denominated senior notes. In May 2016, $460December 2017, $100 million of WPD'sWPD’s U.S. dollar-denominated senior notes were repaid upon maturity and $460$100 million notional value of cross-currency interest rate swap contracts matured. PPL recorded a $46$19 million gain upon settlement of the cross-currency interest rate swap contracts, which largely offset a loss recorded on the revaluation of U.S. dollar-denominated senior notes.
 
Cash flow hedges are discontinued if it is no longer probable that the original forecasted transaction will occur by the end of the originally specified time period and any amounts previously recorded in AOCI are reclassified into earnings once it is determined that the hedged transaction is not probable of occurring.
 
PPL had noan insignificant amount of cash flow hedges reclassified into earnings associated with discontinued cash flow hedges in 20162017 and an insignificant amount in 2014.2016.

As a result of the June 1, 2015 spinoff of PPL Energy Supply, all PPL cash flow hedges associated with PPL Energy Supply were ineffective and discontinued and therefore, reclassified into earnings during the second quarter of 2015 and reflected in discontinued operations for 2015. See Note 8 for additional information. PPL had no other cash flow hedges reclassified into earnings associated with discontinued cash flow hedges in 2015.


225




 
At December 31, 2016,2017, the accumulated net unrecognized after-tax gains (losses) on qualifying derivatives expected to be reclassified into earnings during the next 12 months is $53 million.insignificant. Amounts are reclassified as the hedged interest expense is recorded.
 
Economic Activity (PPL, LKE and LG&E)
 
LG&E enters into interest rate swap contracts that economically hedge interest payments on variable rate debt. Because realized gains and losses from the swaps, including terminated swap contracts, are recoverable through regulated rates, any subsequent changes in fair value of these derivatives are included in regulatory assets or liabilities until they are realized as interest expense. Realized gains and losses are recognized in "Interest Expense" on the Statements of Income at the time the underlying hedged interest expense is recorded. In December 2016, a swap with a notional amount of $32 million was terminated. A cash settlement of $9 million was paid on the terminated swap. The settlement is included in noncurrent regulatory assets on the Balance Sheet and in "Cash Flows from Operating Activities" on the Statement of Cash Flows. At December 31, 2016,2017, LG&E held contracts with a notional amount of $147 million that range in maturity through 2033.
 
Foreign Currency Risk
 
(PPL)
 
PPL is exposed to foreign currency risk, primarily through investments in and earnings of U.K. affiliates. PPL has adopted a foreign currency risk management program designed to hedge certain foreign currency exposures, including firm commitments, recognized assets or liabilities, anticipated transactions and net investments. In addition, PPL enters into financial instruments to protect against foreign currency translation risk of expected GBP earnings.
 
Net Investment Hedges
 
PPL enters into foreign currency contracts on behalf of a subsidiary to protect the value of a portion of its net investment in WPD. There were no such contracts outstanding at December 31, 2016.2017.
 
At December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, PPL had $21$22 million and $19$21 million of accumulated net investment hedge after tax gains (losses) that were included in the foreign currency translation adjustment component of AOCI.
 
Economic Activity
 
PPL enters into foreign currency contracts on behalf of a subsidiary to economically hedge GBP-denominated anticipated earnings. At December 31, 2016,2017, the total exposure hedged by PPL was approximately £1.9£2.6 billion (approximately $2.6$3.5 billion based on contracted rates). These contracts had termination dates ranging from January 20172018 through December 2018.June 2020.

In the third quarter of 2016, PPL settled foreign currency hedges related to 2017 and 2018 anticipated earnings, resulting in receipt of $310 million of cash and entered into new hedges at current market rates. The notional amount of the settled hedges was approximately £1.3 billion (approximately $2.0 billion based on contracted rates) with termination dates from January 2017 through November 2018. The settlement did not have a significant impact on net income as the hedge values were previously marked to fair value and recognized in "Other Income (Expense) - net" on the Statement of Income.
 
Accounting and Reporting
 
(All Registrants)
 
All derivative instruments are recorded at fair value on the Balance Sheet as an asset or liability unless NPNS is elected. NPNS contracts for PPL and PPL Electric include certain full-requirement purchase contracts and other physical purchase contracts. Changes in the fair value of derivatives not designated as NPNS are recognized in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met and designated as such, except for the changes in fair values of LG&E's and KU's interest rate swaps that are recognized as regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities. See Note 6 for amounts recorded in regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities at December 31, 20162017 and 2015.2016.
 
See Note 1 for additional information on accounting policies related to derivative instruments.
 


226




(PPL)
 
The following table presents the fair value and location of derivative instruments recorded on the Balance Sheets. 
December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Derivatives designated as
hedging instruments
 
Derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments
 
Derivatives designated as
hedging instruments
 
Derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments
Derivatives designated as
hedging instruments
 
Derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments
 
Derivatives designated as
hedging instruments
 
Derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments
Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities Assets LiabilitiesAssets Liabilities Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities
Current: 
  
  
  
      
  
 
  
  
  
      
  
Price Risk Management 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Assets/Liabilities (a): 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Interest rate swaps (b)$
 $
 $
 $4
 $
 $24
 $
 $5
$
 $
 $
 $4
 $
 $
 $
 $4
Cross-currency swaps (b)32
 
 
 
 35
 
 
 
4
 
 
 
 32
 
 
 
Foreign currency contracts
 
 31
 21
 10
 
 94
 1

 
 45
 67
 
 
 31
 21
Total current32
 
 31
 25
 45
 24
 94
 6
4
 
 45
 71
 32
 
 31
 25
Noncurrent: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Price Risk Management 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Assets/Liabilities (a): 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Interest rate swaps (b)
 
 
 27
 
 
 
 42

 
 
 22
 
 
 
 27
Cross-currency swaps (b)156
 
 
 
 51
 
 
 
97
 
 
 
 156
 
 
 
Foreign currency contracts
 
 180
 6
 
 
 105
 

 
 118
 81
 
 
 180
 6
Total noncurrent156
 
 180
 33
 51
 
 105
 42
97
 
 118
 103
 156
 
 180
 33
Total derivatives$188
 $
 $211
 $58
 $96
 $24
 $199
 $48
$101
 $
 $163
 $174
 $188
 $
 $211
 $58
 
(a)Current portion is included in "Price risk management assets" and "Other current liabilities" and noncurrent portion is included in "Price risk management assets" and "Other deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities" on the Balance Sheets.
(b)Excludes accrued interest, if applicable.

The following tables present the pre-tax effect of derivative instruments recognized in income, OCI or regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities.
Derivative
Relationships
 
Derivative Gain
(Loss) Recognized in
OCI (Effective Portion)
 
Location of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in Income
on Derivative
 
Gain (Loss) Reclassified
from AOCI into Income
(Effective Portion)
 
Gain (Loss) Recognized
in Income on Derivative
(Ineffective Portion and
Amount Excluded from
Effectiveness Testing)
 
Derivative Gain
(Loss) Recognized in
OCI (Effective Portion)
 
Location of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in Income
on Derivative
 
Gain (Loss) Reclassified
from AOCI into Income
(Effective Portion)
 
Gain (Loss) Recognized
in Income on Derivative
(Ineffective Portion and
Amount Excluded from
Effectiveness Testing)
2017      
Cash Flow Hedges:      
Interest rate swaps $
 Interest Expense $(9) $
Cross-currency swaps (98) Other Income (Expense) - net (82) 
Total $(98) $(91) $
Net Investment Hedges:  
    
Foreign currency contracts $1
    
      
2016            
Cash Flow Hedges:            
Interest rate swaps $(21) Interest Expense $(7) $
 $(21) Interest Expense $(7) $
Cross-currency swaps 130
 Other Income (Expense) - net 116
 
 130
 Other Income (Expense) - net 116
 
  
 Interest Expense 3
 
   Interest Expense 3
 
Total $109
 $112
 $
 $109
 $112
 $
Net Investment Hedges:  
      
    
Foreign currency contracts $2
     $2
    
      
2015      
Cash Flow Hedges:      
Interest rate swaps $(34) Interest Expense $(11) $
   Discontinued operations 
 (77)
Cross-currency swaps 60
 Other Income (Expense) - net 49
 
   Interest Expense 2
 
Commodity contracts   Discontinued operations 13
 7
Total $26
 $53
 $(70)
Net Investment Hedges:  
    
Foreign currency contracts $9
    


227




Derivative
Relationships
 
Derivative Gain
(Loss) Recognized in
OCI (Effective Portion)
 
Location of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in Income
on Derivative
 
Gain (Loss) Reclassified
from AOCI into Income
(Effective Portion)
 
Gain (Loss) Recognized
in Income on Derivative
(Ineffective Portion and
Amount Excluded from
Effectiveness Testing)
 
Derivative Gain
(Loss) Recognized in
OCI (Effective Portion)
 
Location of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in Income
on Derivative
 
Gain (Loss) Reclassified
from AOCI into Income
(Effective Portion)
 
Gain (Loss) Recognized
in Income on Derivative
(Ineffective Portion and
Amount Excluded from
Effectiveness Testing)
            
2014      
2015      
Cash Flow Hedges:            
Interest rate swaps $(91) Interest Expense $(18) $2
 $(34) Interest Expense $(11) $
   Discontinued operations 
 (77)
Cross-currency swaps 58
 Other Income (Expense) - net 57
 
 60
 Other Income (Expense) - net 49
 
   Interest Expense 4
 
   Interest Expense 2
 
Commodity contracts   Discontinued operations 42
 
   Discontinued operations 13
 7
Total $(33) $85
 $2
 $26
 $53
 $(70)
Net Investment Hedges:  
      
    
Foreign currency contracts $23
     $9
    
Derivatives Not Designated as
Hedging Instruments
 
Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in
Income on Derivative
 2016 2015 2014 
Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in
Income on Derivative
 2017 2016 2015
Foreign currency contracts Other Income (Expense) - net $384
 $122
 $121
 Other Income (Expense) - net $(261) $384
 $122
Interest rate swaps Interest Expense (7) (8) (8) Interest Expense (6) (7) (8)
 Total $377
 $114
 $113
 Total $(267) $377
 $114

Derivatives Designated as
Hedging Instruments
 
Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized as
Regulatory Liabilities/Assets
 2016 2015 2014 
Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized as
Regulatory Liabilities/Assets
 2017 2016 2015
Interest rate swaps Regulatory assets - noncurrent $
 $(22) $(66) Regulatory assets - noncurrent $
 $
 $(22)

Derivatives Not Designated as
Hedging Instruments
 
Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized as
Regulatory Liabilities/Assets
 2016 2015 2014 
Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized as
Regulatory Liabilities/Assets
 2017 2016 2015
Interest rate swaps Regulatory assets - noncurrent $7
 $1
 $(12) Regulatory assets - noncurrent $5
 $7
 $1
 
(LKE)
 
The following table presents the pre-tax effect of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges that are recognized in regulatory assets. All derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges were terminated in 2015 and there is no activity in the current period.
Derivative Instruments Location of Gain (Loss) 2016 2015 2014 Location of Gain (Loss) 2017 2016 2015
Interest rate swaps Regulatory assets - noncurrent $
 $(22) $(66) Regulatory assets - noncurrent $
 $
 $(22)
 
(LG&E)
 
The following table presents the pre-tax effect of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges that are recognized in regulatory assets. All derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges were terminated in 2015 and there is no activity in the current period.
Derivative Instruments Location of Gain (Loss) 2016 2015 2014 Location of Gain (Loss) 2017 2016 2015
Interest rate swaps Regulatory asset - noncurrent $
 $(11) $(33) Regulatory asset - noncurrent $
 $
 $(11)
 
(KU)
 
The following table presents the pre-tax effect of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges that are recognized in regulatory assets. All derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges were terminated in 2015 and there is no activity in the current period.
Derivative Instruments Location of Gain (Loss) 2016 2015 2014 Location of Gain (Loss) 2017 2016 2015
Interest rate swaps Regulatory assets - noncurrent $
 $(11) $(33) Regulatory assets - noncurrent $
 $
 $(11)
 


228




(LKE and LG&E)
 
The following table presents the fair value and the location on the Balance Sheets of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments.
 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
 Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities
Current:    
    
    
    
Price Risk Management    
    
    
    
Assets/Liabilities (a):    
    
Assets/Liabilities:    
    
Interest rate swaps $
 $4
 $
 $5
 $
 $4
 $
 $4
Total current 
 4
 
 5
 
 4
 
 4
Noncurrent:    
    
    
    
Price Risk Management    
    
    
    
Assets/Liabilities (a):    
    
Assets/Liabilities:    
    
Interest rate swaps 
 27
 
 42
 
 22
 
 27
Total noncurrent 
 27
 
 42
 
 22
 
 27
Total derivatives $
 $31
 $
 $47
 $
 $26
 $
 $31
 
(a)Represents the location on the Balance Sheets.

The following tables present the pre-tax effect of derivatives not designated as cash flow hedges that are recognized in income or regulatory assets. 
Derivative Instruments Location of Gain (Loss) 2016 2015 2014 Location of Gain (Loss) 2017 2016 2015
Interest rate swaps Interest Expense $(7) $(8) $(8) Interest Expense $(6) $(7) $(8)
Derivative Instruments Location of Gain (Loss) 2016 2015 2014 Location of Gain (Loss) 2017 2016 2015
Interest rate swaps Regulatory assets - noncurrent $7
 $1
 $(12) Regulatory assets - noncurrent $5
 $7
 $1

(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
 
Offsetting Derivative Instruments
 
PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU or certain of their subsidiaries have master netting arrangements in place and also enter into agreements pursuant to which they purchase or sell certain energy and other products. Under the agreements, upon termination of the agreement as a result of a default or other termination event, the non-defaulting party typically would have a right to set off amounts owed under the agreement against any other obligations arising between the two parties (whether under the agreement or not), whether matured or contingent and irrespective of the currency, place of payment or place of booking of the obligation.
 
PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU have elected not to offset derivative assets and liabilities and not to offset net derivative positions against the right to reclaim cash collateral pledged (an asset) or the obligation to return cash collateral received (a liability) under derivatives agreements. The table below summarizes the derivative positions presented in the balance sheets where a right of setoff exists under these arrangements and related cash collateral received or pledged.
 Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities
   Eligible for Offset     Eligible for Offset     Eligible for Offset     Eligible for Offset  
 Gross 
Derivative
Instruments
 
Cash
Collateral
Received
 Net Gross 
Derivative
Instruments
 
Cash
Collateral
Pledged
 Net Gross 
Derivative
Instruments
 
Cash
Collateral
Received
 Net Gross 
Derivative
Instruments
 
Cash
Collateral
Pledged
 Net
December 31, 2016                
December 31, 2017                
Treasury Derivatives                                
PPL $399
 $27
 19
 $353
 $58
 $27
 $3
 $28
 $264
 $107
 $20
 $137
 $174
 $107
 $
 $67
LKE 
 
 
 
 31
 
 3
 28
 
 
 
 
 26
 
 
 26
LG&E 
 
 
 
 31
 
 3
 28
 
 
 
 
 26
 
 
 26


229




 Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities
   Eligible for Offset     Eligible for Offset     Eligible for Offset     Eligible for Offset  
 Gross 
Derivative
Instruments
 
Cash
Collateral
Received
 Net Gross 
Derivative
Instruments
 
Cash
Collateral
Pledged
 Net Gross 
Derivative
Instruments
 
Cash
Collateral
Received
 Net Gross 
Derivative
Instruments
 
Cash
Collateral
Pledged
 Net
December 31, 2015  
  
    
  
  
  
  
December 31, 2016  
  
    
  
  
  
  
Treasury Derivatives      
                
          
PPL $295
 $25
 $
 $270
 $72
 $25
 $9
 $38
 $399
 $27
 $19
 $353
 $58
 $27
 $3
 $28
LKE 
 
 
 
 47
 
 9
 38
 
 
 
 
 31
 
 3
 28
LG&E 
 
 
 
 47
 
 9
 38
 
 
 
 
 31
 
 3
 28
 
Credit Risk-Related Contingent Features
 
Certain derivative contracts contain credit risk-related contingent features, which when in a net liability position, would permit the counterparties to require the transfer of additional collateral upon a decrease in the credit ratings of PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU or certain of their subsidiaries. Most of these features would require the transfer of additional collateral or permit the counterparty to terminate the contract if the applicable credit rating were to fall below investment grade. Some of these features also would allow the counterparty to require additional collateral upon each downgrade in credit rating at levels that remain above investment grade. In either case, if the applicable credit rating were to fall below investment grade, and assuming no assignment to an investment grade affiliate were allowed, most of these credit contingent features require either immediate payment of the net liability as a termination payment or immediate and ongoing full collateralization on derivative instruments in net liability positions.
 
Additionally, certain derivative contracts contain credit risk-related contingent features that require adequate assurance of performance be provided if the other party has reasonable concerns regarding the performance of PPL's, LKE's, LG&E's and KU's obligations under the contracts. A counterparty demanding adequate assurance could require a transfer of additional collateral or other security, including letters of credit, cash and guarantees from a creditworthy entity. This would typically involve negotiations among the parties. However, amounts disclosed below represent assumed immediate payment or immediate and ongoing full collateralization for derivative instruments in net liability positions with "adequate assurance" features.
 
(PPL, LKE and LG&E)
 
At December 31, 2016,2017, derivative contracts in a net liability position that contain credit risk-related contingent features, collateral posted on those positions and the related effect of a decrease in credit ratings below investment grade are summarized as follows:
 PPL LKE LG&E PPL LKE LG&E
Aggregate fair value of derivative instruments in a net liability position with credit risk-related contingent features $13
 $13
 $13
 $51
 $10
 $10
Aggregate fair value of collateral posted on these derivative instruments 3
 3
 3
 
 
 
Aggregate fair value of additional collateral requirements in the event of a credit downgrade below investment grade (a) 10
 10
 10
 51
 10
 10
 
(a)Includes the effect of net receivables and payables already recorded on the Balance Sheet.

18. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill

(PPL)

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by segment were:
U.K. Regulated Kentucky Regulated TotalU.K. Regulated Kentucky Regulated Total
2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016
Balance at beginning of period (a)$2,888
 $3,005
 $662
 $662
 $3,550
 $3,667
$2,398
 $2,888
 $662
 $662
 $3,060
 $3,550
Effect of foreign currency exchange rates(490) (117)  
  
 (490) (117)198
 (490)  
  
 198
 (490)
Balance at end of period (a)$2,398
 $2,888
 $662
 $662
 $3,060
 $3,550
$2,596
 $2,398
 $662
 $662
 $3,258
 $3,060


230




(a)There were no accumulated impairment losses related to goodwill.
 
Other Intangible Assets

(PPL)

The gross carrying amount and the accumulated amortization of other intangible assets were:
December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
Subject to amortization:              
Contracts (a)$405
 $325
 $407
 $300
$138
 $67
 $405
 $325
Land and transmission rights362
 115
 337
 111
382
 120
 362
 115
Emission allowances/RECs (b)2
 
 5
 
1
 
 2
 
Licenses and other6
 2
 10
 5
7
 3
 6
 2
Total subject to amortization775
 442
 759
 416
528
 190
 775
 442
              
Not subject to amortization due to indefinite life:              
Land and transmission rights19
 
 33
 
12
 
 19
 
Easements (c)348
 
 303
 
347
 
 348
 
Total not subject to amortization due to indefinite life367
 
 336
 
359
 
 367
 
Total$1,142
 $442
 $1,095
 $416
$887
 $190
 $1,142
 $442
 
(a)Gross carrying amount in 2017 and 2016 includes the fair value at the acquisition date of the OVEC power purchase contract andwith terms favorable to market recognized as a result of the 2010 acquisition of LKE by PPL. Gross carrying amount in 2016 also includes the fair value at the acquisition date of coal contracts with terms favorable to market recognized as a result of the 2010 acquisition of LKE by PPL. At December 31, 2016, these coal contracts were fully amortized. Offsetting regulatory liabilities were recorded related to these contracts, which are being amortized over the same period as the intangible assets, eliminating any income statement impact. This is referred to as "regulatory offset" in the tables below. See Note 6 for additional information.
(b)Emission allowances/RECs are expensed when consumed or sold; therefore, there is no accumulated amortization.
(c)The increase during 2016 was primarily from increases at WPD.

Current intangible assets are included in "Other current assets" and long-term intangible assets are included in "Other intangibles" on the Balance Sheets.
Amortization Expense was as follows:          
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Intangible assets with no regulatory offset$6
 $6
 $6
$6
 $6
 $6
Intangible assets with regulatory offset24
 51
 47
9
 24
 51
Total$30
 $57
 $53
$15
 $30
 $57
 
Amortization expense for each of the next five years, excluding insignificant amounts for consumption of emission allowances/RECs, is estimated to be:
2017 2018 2019 2020 20212018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Intangible assets with no regulatory offset$6
 $6
 $6
 $6
 $6
$6
 $6
 $6
 $6
 $6
Intangible assets with regulatory offset9
 9
 9
 8
 8
9
 9
 8
 8
 8
Total$15
 $15
 $15
 $14
 $14
$15
 $15
 $14
 $14
 $14



231




(PPL Electric)

The gross carrying amount and the accumulated amortization of other intangible assets were:
December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
Subject to amortization:              
Land and transmission rights$341
 $112
 $316
 $108
$361
 $117
 $341
 $112
Licenses and other3
 1
 4
 1
3
 1
 3
 1
Total subject to amortization344
 113
 320
 109
364
 118
 344
 113
              
Not subject to amortization due to indefinite life:              
Land and transmission rights20
 
 33
 
13
 
 20
 
Total$364
 $113
 $353
 $109
$377
 $118
 $364
 $113
 
Intangible assets are shown as "Intangibles" on the Balance Sheets.
 
Amortization expense was insignificant in 2017, 2016 2015 and 20142015 and is expected to be insignificant in future years.

(LKE)

The gross carrying amount and the accumulated amortization of other intangible assets were:
December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
Subject to amortization:              
Coal contracts (a)$269
 $269
 $269
 $252
$
 $
 $269
 $269
Land and transmission rights21
 3
 21
 2
21
 3
 21
 3
Emission allowances (b)
 
 3
 
OVEC power purchase agreement (c)126
 49
 126
 42
OVEC power purchase agreement (b)126
 58
 126
 49
Total subject to amortization$416
 $321
 $419
 $296
$147
 $61
 $416
 $321
 
(a)Gross carrying amount represents the fair value at the acquisition date of coal contracts with terms favorable to market recognized as a result of the 2010 acquisition by PPL. An offsetting regulatory liability was recorded related to these contracts, which was amortized over the same period as the intangible assets,asset, eliminating any income statement impact. See Note 6 for additional information.
(b)Emission allowances are expensed when consumed or sold; therefore, there is no accumulated amortization.
(c)Gross carrying amount represents the fair value at the acquisition date of the OVEC power purchase contract recognized as a result of the 2010 acquisition by PPL. An offsetting regulatory liability was recorded related to this contract, which is being amortized over the same period as the intangible asset, eliminating any income statement impact. See Note 6 for additional information.

Long-term intangible assets are presented as "Other intangibles" on the Balance Sheets.

Amortization expense was as follows:
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Intangible assets with no regulatory offset$1
 $
 $
$
 $1
 $
Intangible assets with regulatory offset24
 51
 47
9
 24
 51
Total$25
 $51
 $47
$9
 $25
 $51

Amortization expense for each of the next five years is estimated to be:
 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Intangible assets with regulatory offset$9
 $9
 $9
 $8
 $8
 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Intangible assets with regulatory offset$9
 $9
 $8
 $8
 $8
 


232




(LG&E)

The gross carrying amount and the accumulated amortization of other intangible assets were:
December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
Subject to amortization:              
Coal contracts (a)$124
 $124
 $124
 $116
$
 $
 $124
 $124
Land and transmission rights7
 1
 7
 1
7
 1
 7
 1
Emission allowances (b)
 
 1
 
OVEC power purchase agreement (c)87
 34
 87
 29
OVEC power purchase agreement (b)87
 40
 87
 34
Total subject to amortization$218
 $159
 $219
 $146
$94
 $41
 $218
 $159
 
(a)Gross carrying amount represents the fair value at the acquisition date of coal contracts with terms favorable to market recognized as a result of the 2010 acquisition by PPL. An offsetting regulatory liability was recorded related to these contracts, which was amortized over the same period as the intangible assets,asset, eliminating any income statement impact. See Note 6 for additional information.
(b)Emission allowances are expensed when consumed or sold; therefore, there is no accumulated amortization.
(c)Gross carrying amount represents the fair value at the acquisition date of the OVEC power purchase contract recognized as a result of the 2010 acquisition by PPL. An offsetting regulatory liability was recorded related to this contract, which is being amortized over the same period as the intangible asset, eliminating any income statement impact. See Note 6 for additional information.

Long-term intangible assets are presented as "Other intangibles" on the Balance Sheets.

Amortization expense was as follows:
 2016 2015 2014
Intangible assets with regulatory offset$13
 $24
 $23
 2017 2016 2015
Intangible assets with regulatory offset$6
 $13
 $24

Amortization expense for each of the next five years is estimated to be:
 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Intangible assets with regulatory offset$6
 $6
 $6
 $6
 $6
 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Intangible assets with regulatory offset$6
 $6
 $6
 $6
 $6

(KU)

The gross carrying amount and the accumulated amortization of other intangible assets were:
December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
Subject to amortization:              
Coal contracts (a)$145
 $145
 $145
 $136
$
 $
 $145
 $145
Land and transmission rights14
 2
 14
 1
14
 2
 14
 2
Emission allowances (b)
 
 2
 
OVEC power purchase agreement (c)39
 15
 39
 13
OVEC power purchase agreement (b)39
 18
 39
 15
Total subject to amortization$198
 $162
 $200
 $150
$53
 $20
 $198
 $162

(a)Gross carrying amount represents the fair value at the acquisition date of coal contracts with terms favorable to market recognized as a result of the 2010 acquisition by PPL. An offsetting regulatory liability was recorded related to these contracts, which was amortized over the same period as the intangible assets,asset, eliminating any income statement impact. See Note 6 for additional information.
(b)Emission allowances are expensed when consumed or sold; therefore, there is no accumulated amortization.
(c)Gross carrying amount represents the fair value at the acquisition date of the OVEC power purchase contract recognized as a result of the 2010 acquisition by PPL. An offsetting regulatory liability was recorded related to this contract, which is being amortized over the same period as the intangible asset, eliminating any income statement impact. See Note 6 for additional information.

Long-term intangible assets are presented as "Other intangibles" on the Balance Sheets.



Amortization expense was as follows:
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Intangible assets with no regulatory offset$1
 $
 $
$
 $1
 $
Intangible assets with regulatory offset11
 27
 24
3
 11
 27
Total$12
 $27
 $24
$3
 $12
 $27


233





 
Amortization expense for each of the next five years is estimated to be:
 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Intangible assets with regulatory offset$3
 $3
 $3
 $2
 $2
 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Intangible assets with regulatory offset$3
 $3
 $2
 $2
 $2
 
19. Asset Retirement Obligations
 
(PPL)
 
WPD has recorded conditional AROs required by U.K. law related to treated wood poles, gas-filled switchgear and fluid-filled cables.
 
(PPL and PPL Electric)
 
PPL Electric has identified legal retirement obligations for the retirement of certain transmission assets that could not be reasonably estimated due to indeterminable settlement dates. These assets are located on rights-of-way that allow the grantor to require PPL Electric to relocate or remove the assets. Since this option is at the discretion of the grantor of the right-of-way, PPL Electric is unable to determine when these events may occur.
 
(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
 
LG&E's and KU's AROs are primarily related to the final retirement of assets associated with generating units. LG&E also has AROs related to natural gas mains and wells. LG&E's and KU's transmission and distribution lines largely operate under perpetual property easement agreements, which do not generally require restoration upon removal of the property. Therefore, no material AROs are recorded for transmission and distribution assets. As described in Notes 1 and 6, for LKE, LG&E and KU, all ARO accretion and depreciation expenses are reclassified as a regulatory asset. ARO regulatory assets associated with approved ECRcertain CCR projects for CCRs are amortized to expense over a period of 10 to 25 years based on retirement expenditures made related to the obligation.in accordance with regulatory approvals. For other AROs, at the time of retirement, the related ARO regulatory asset is offset against the associated cost of removal regulatory liability, PP&E and ARO liability.
 
The changes in the carrying amounts of AROs were as follows.follows:
 PPL LKE LG&E KU
 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015
ARO at beginning of period$586
 $336
 $535
 $285
 $175
 $74
 $360
 $211
Accretion24
 19
 22
 18
 7
 5
 15
 13
Obligations incurred
 5
 
 5
 
 3
 
 2
Changes in estimated timing or cost(84) 235
 (95) 234
 (19) 98
 (76) 136
Effect of foreign currency exchange rates(9) (2) 
 
 
 
 
 
Obligations settled(29) (7) (29) (7) (18) (5) (11) (2)
ARO at end of period$488
 $586
 $433
 $535
 $145
 $175
 $288
 $360
LKE recorded decreases of $114 million ($90 million at KU and $24 million at LG&E) to the existing AROs during 2016 related to the closure of CCR impoundments. These revisions are the result of changes in closure plans related to expected costs and timing of closures. Further changes to AROs, capital plans or operating costs may be required as estimates of future cash flows are refined based on closure developments and regulatory or legal proceedings.
LKE recorded increases of $228 million ($139 million at KU and $89 million at LG&E) to the existing AROs during 2015 as a result of an engineering study that was performed, in connection with the final CCR rule, providing clarity on projected CCR closure costs and revisions in the timing and amounts of future expected cash flows. Further increases to AROs or changes to current capital plans or to operating costs may be required as estimates of future cash flows are refined based on closure developments, groundwater monitoring results and regulatory or legal proceedings.

 PPL LKE LG&E KU
 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016
ARO at beginning of period$488
 $586
 $433
 $535
 $145
 $175
 $288
 $360
Accretion21
 24
 20
 22
 7
 7
 13
 15
Changes in estimated timing or cost (a)(73) (84) (54) (95) (8) (19) (46) (76)
Effect of foreign currency exchange rates4
 (9) 
 
 
 
 
 
Obligations settled(43) (29) (43) (29) (23) (18) (20) (11)
ARO at end of period$397
 $488
 $356
 $433
 $121
 $145
 $235
 $288

(a)LKE recorded decreases of $60 million ($52 million at KU and $8 million at LG&E) and $114 million ($90 million at KU and $24 million at LG&E) to the existing AROs during 2017 and 2016 related to the closure of CCR impoundments. These revisions are the result of changes in closure plans related to expected costs and timing of closures. Further changes to AROs, capital plans or operating costs may be required as estimates of future cash flows are refined based on closure developments and regulatory or legal proceedings.

See Note 13 for information on the final CCR rule and Note 6 for information on the rate recovery applications with the KPSC.applications.
 
20. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
 
(PPL and LKE)
 
The after-tax changes in AOCI by component for the years ended December 31 were as follows. follows: 


234





  Unrealized gains (losses)   Defined benefit plans    Unrealized gains (losses)   Defined benefit plans  
Foreign
currency
translation
adjustments
 
Available-
for-sale
securities
 
Qualifying
derivatives
 
Equity
investees'
AOCI
 
Prior
service
costs
 
Actuarial
gain
(loss)
 Total
Foreign
currency
translation
adjustments
 
Available-
for-sale
securities
 
Qualifying
derivatives
 
Equity
investees'
AOCI
 
Prior
service
costs
 
Actuarial
gain
(loss)
 Total
PPL                          
December 31, 2013$(11) $172
 $94
 $1
 $(6) $(1,815) $(1,565)
Amounts arising during the year(275) 35
 (10) 
 5
 (509) (754)
Reclassifications from AOCI
 (6) (64) 
 4
 111
 45
Net OCI during the year(275) 29
 (74) 
 9
 (398) (709)
December 31, 2014$(286) $201
 $20
 $1
 $3
 $(2,213) $(2,274)$(286) $201
 $20
 $1
 $3
 $(2,213) $(2,274)
             
Amounts arising during the year(234) 8
 26
 
 (9) (366) (575)(234) 8
 26
 
 (9) (366) (575)
Reclassifications from AOCI
 (2) 2
 (1) 
 146
 145

 (2) 2
 (1) 
 146
 145
Net OCI during the year(234) 6
 28
 (1) (9) (220) (430)(234) 6
 28
 (1) (9) (220) (430)
Distribution of PPL Energy
Supply (See Note 8)

 (207) (55) $
 
 238
 (24)
 (207) (55) 
 
 238
 (24)
December 31, 2015$(520) $
 $(7) $
 $(6) $(2,195) $(2,728)$(520) $
 $(7) $
 $(6) $(2,195) $(2,728)
                          
Amounts arising during the year(1,107) 
 91
 
 (3) (61) (1,080)(1,107) 
 91
 
 (3) (61) (1,080)
Reclassifications from AOCI
 
 (91) (1) 1
 121
 30

 
 (91) (1) 1
 121
 30
Net OCI during the year(1,107) 
 
 (1) (2) 60
 (1,050)(1,107) 
 
 (1) (2) 60
 (1,050)
December 31, 2016$(1,627) $
 $(7) $(1) $(8) $(2,135) $(3,778)$(1,627) $
 $(7) $(1) $(8) $(2,135) $(3,778)
                          
LKE             
December 31, 2013 
  
  
 $1
 $(2) $14
 $13
Amounts arising during the year 
  
  
 
 (7) (50) (57)538
 
 (79) 
 
 (308) 151
Reclassifications from AOCI      (1) 1
 (1) (1)
 
 73
 1
 1
 130
 205
Net OCI during the year 
  
  
 (1) (6) (51) (58)538
 
 (6) 1
 1
 (178) 356
December 31, 2017$(1,089) $
 $(13) $
 $(7) $(2,313) $(3,422)
             
LKE             
December 31, 2014 
  
  
 $
 $(8) $(37) $(45) 
  
  
 $
 $(8) $(37) $(45)
             
Amounts arising during the year 
  
  
 
 (3) (4) (7) 
  
  
 
 (3) (4) (7)
Reclassifications from AOCI 
  
  
 
 1
 5
 6
      
 1
 5
 6
Net OCI during the year 
  
  
 
 (2) 1
 (1) 
  
  
 
 (2) 1
 (1)
December 31, 2015 
  
  
 $
 $(10) $(36) $(46) 
  
  
 $
 $(10) $(36) $(46)
                          
Amounts arising during the year   
  
 
 
 (27) (27) 
  
  
 
 
 (27) (27)
Reclassifications from AOCI 
  
  
 (1) 2
 2
 3
 
  
  
 (1) 2
 2
 3
Net OCI during the year 
  
  
 (1) 2
 (25) (24) 
  
  
 (1) 2
 (25) (24)
December 31, 2016 
  
  
 $(1) $(8) $(61) $(70) 
  
  
 $(1) $(8) $(61) $(70)
             
Amounts arising during the year   
  
 
 (2) (23) (25)
Reclassifications from AOCI 
  
  
 1
 1
 5
 7
Net OCI during the year 
  
  
 1
 (1) (18) (18)
December 31, 2017 
  
  
 $
 $(9) $(79) $(88)

The following table presents PPL's gains (losses) and related income taxes for reclassifications from AOCI for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. LKE amounts are insignificant for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. The defined benefit plan components of AOCI are not reflected in their entirety in the statement of income; rather, they are included in the


computation of net periodic defined benefit costs (credits) and subject to capitalization. See Note 11 for additional information.
 PPL  PPL 
Details about AOCI 2016 2015 
Affected Line Item on the
Statements of Income
 2017 2016 2015 Affected Line Item on the
Statements of Income
Available-for-sale securities $
 $4
 Other Income (Expense) - net $
 $
 $4
 Other Income (Expense) - net
Total Pre-tax 
 4
   
 
 4
  
Income Taxes 
 (2)   
 
 (2)  
Total After-tax 
 2
   
 
 2
  
     
Qualifying derivatives      
Interest rate swaps (7) (11) Interest Expense
 
 (77) Discontinued operations
Cross-currency swaps 116
 49
 Other Income (Expense) - net
 3
 2
 Interest Expense
Commodity contracts 
 20
 Discontinued operations
Total Pre-tax 112
 (17)  
Income Taxes (21) 15
  
Total After-tax 91
 (2)  
     
Equity Investees' AOCI 1
 1
 Other Income (Expense) - net
Total Pre-tax 1
 1
  
Income Taxes 
 
  
Total After-tax 1
 1
  
     
Defined benefit plans      
Prior service costs (2) 
  
Net actuarial loss (156) (192)  
Total Pre-tax (158) (192)  
Income Taxes 36
 46
  
Total After-tax (122) (146)  
Total reclassifications during the year $(30) $(145)  


235




  PPL  
Details about AOCI 2017 2016 2015 Affected Line Item on the
Statements of Income
         
Qualifying derivatives        
Interest rate swaps (9) (7) (11) Interest Expense
  
 
 (77) Discontinued operations
Cross-currency swaps (82) 116
 49
 Other Income (Expense) - net
  
 3
 2
 Interest Expense
Commodity contracts 
 
 20
 Discontinued operations
Total Pre-tax (91) 112
 (17)  
Income Taxes 18
 (21) 15
  
Total After-tax (73) 91
 (2)  
         
Equity Investees' AOCI (1) 1
 1
 Other Income (Expense) - net
Total Pre-tax (1) 1
 1
  
Income Taxes 
 
 
  
Total After-tax (1) 1
 1
  
         
Defined benefit plans        
Prior service costs (2) (2) 
  
Net actuarial loss (167) (156) (192)  
Total Pre-tax (169) (158) (192)  
Income Taxes 38
 36
 46
  
Total After-tax (131) (122) (146)  
Total reclassifications during the year $(205) $(30) $(145)  
 
21. New Accounting Guidance Pending Adoption
 
(All Registrants)
 
Accounting for Revenue from Contracts with Customers
 
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued accounting guidance that establishes a comprehensive new model for the recognition of revenue from contracts with customers. This model is based on the core principle that revenue should be recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.
 
For public business entities, this guidance can be applied using either a full retrospective or modified retrospective transition method, beginning in annual reporting periods after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those years. Public business entities may early adopt this guidance in annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Registrants will adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2018.
The Registrants have performedcompleted an assessment of a significant portion of their revenue under this new guidance to determine its effectand have determined it will not have a material impact on their current revenue recognition policies,policies. The Registrants' operating revenues are derived primarily from tariff-based sales that result from providing electricity and at this time they do not believe itnatural gas to customers with no defined contractual term. Tariff-based sales are within the scope of the new guidance, and operating revenues under the new guidance will have a material impact. However,be equivalent to the Registrantselectricity and natural gas delivered and billed in that period (including estimated billings), which is consistent with current practice.
The disclosure requirements included in the standard will continueresult in increased information being provided to monitorenable the developmentusers of industry specific application guidance which could have an impact on their assessments.the financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue arising from contracts with customers. The Registrants will determineinclude disaggregation of revenues by geographic location, customer class or type of service, as applicable. Some revenue arrangements, including alternative revenue programs and lease income, are excluded from the transition method theyscope of the new guidance and will apply afterbe accounted for and disclosed separately from revenues from contracts with customers. The Registrants will also disclose the industry specific applicationopening and closing balances of accounts receivable and any contract assets or contract liabilities resulting from contracts with customers.

The Registrants adopted this guidance is final andeffective January 1, 2018 using the implications of using either the full retrospective or modified retrospective transition methods are known.method.



236




Accounting for Leases
 
In February 2016, the FASB issued accounting guidance for leases. This new guidance requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for virtually all of their leases (other than leases that meet the definition of a short-term lease). For income statement purposes, the FASB retained a dual model for lessees, requiring leases to be classified as either operating or finance. Operating leases will result in straight-line expense (similar to current operating leases) while finance leases will result in a front-loaded expense pattern (similar to current capital leases). Classification will be based on criteria that are largely similar to those applied in current lease accounting, but without explicit bright lines.line tests.
 
Lessor accounting under the new guidance is similar to the current model, but updated to align with certain changes to the lessee model and the new revenue recognition standard. Similar to current practice, lessors will classify leases as operating, direct financing, or sales-type.
 
The standard is effective for public companiesbusiness entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The new standard must be adopted using a modified retrospective transition, and provides for certain practical expedients. One of these practical expedients allows entities to elect to not evaluate land easements as leases that exist or expired before the adoption date and were not previously accounted for as leases under current lease guidance. Transition will require application of the new guidance at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented.
 
The Registrants are currently assessing the impact of adopting this guidance. The Registrants will adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2019.

Accounting for Financial Instrument Credit Losses
 
In June 2016, the FASB issued accounting guidance that requires the use of a current expected credit loss (CECL) model for the measurement of credit losses on financial instruments within the scope of this guidance, which includes accounts receivable. The CECL model requires an entity to measure credit losses using historical information, current information and reasonable and supportable forecasts of future events, rather than the incurred loss impairment model required under current GAAP.

For public business entities, this guidance will be applied using a modified retrospective approach and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those years. All entities may early adopt this guidance beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those years.

The Registrants are currently assessing the impact of adopting this guidance and the period they will adopt it.

Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost

In March 2017, the FASB issued accounting guidance that changes the income statement presentation of net periodic benefit cost. This new guidance requires the service cost component to be disaggregated from other components of net benefit cost and presented in the same income statement line items as other employee compensation costs arising from services rendered during the period. The other components of net periodic benefits will be presented separately from the line items that include the service cost and outside of any subtotal of operating income. Only the service cost component is eligible for capitalization.

For public business entities, the guidance on the presentation of the components of net periodic benefit costs will be applied retrospectively. The guidance that limits the capitalization to the service cost component of net periodic benefit costs will be applied prospectively. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those years. The Registrants adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2018.

For PPL’s, LKE’s and LG&E’s U.S. defined benefit pension and PPL's and LKE's other postretirement benefit plans, the adoption of this new guidance is not expected to have a material impact on either the presentation on the income statements or the amounts capitalized and related impact to expense, as the difference between the service cost and the non-service cost components of net periodic benefit costs has not historically been and is not expected to be material in 2018.



237




For PPL’s U.K. defined benefit pension plans, the non-service cost components of net periodic benefit cost has been in a net-credit position for the current reporting periods and is expected to continue to be in a net-credit position for 2018. Therefore, the estimated impact of adopting this new guidance related to the non-service cost component credits to be reclassified from “Other operation and maintenance” to “Other Income (Expense)-net” on the Statements of Income is approximately $175 million and $120 million for the years ended 2017 and 2016.

The Registrants are finalizing the expected 2018 impacts of adopting the guidance as the amounts are affected by market conditions and assumptions selected at December 31, 2017.

Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities

In August 2017, the FASB issued accounting guidance that reduces complexity when applying hedge accounting as well as improves transparency about an entity's risk management activities. This guidance eliminates recognizing hedge ineffectiveness for cash flow and net investment hedges and provides for the ability to perform subsequent effectiveness assessments qualitatively. The guidance also makes certain changes to allowable methodologies such as allowing entities to apply the short-cut method to partial-term fair value hedges of interest rate risk as well as expands the ability to apply the critical terms match method to cash flow hedges of groups of forecasted transactions. The guidance also updates certain recognition and presentation requirements as well as disclosure requirements.

For public business entities, this guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. This standard must be adopted using a modified retrospective approach and provides for certain transition elections that must be made prior to the first effectiveness testing date after adoption.

The Registrants are currently assessing the impact of adopting this guidance and the period they will adopt it.

(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)

Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment

In January 2017, the FASB issued accounting guidance that simplifies the test for goodwill impairment by eliminating the second step of the quantitative test. The second step of the quantitative test requires a calculation of the implied fair value of goodwill, which is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill in a business combination. Under this new guidance, an entity will now compare the estimated fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying value and recognize an impairment charge for the amount the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit.

For public business entities, this guidance will be applied prospectively and is effective for annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. All entities may early adopt this guidance for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017.

The Registrants are currently assessing the impact of adopting this guidance and the period they will adopt it.

(PPL and LKE)

Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
In February 2018, the FASB issued accounting guidance that gives entities the option to reclassify tax effects stranded within AOCI as a result of the TCJA to retained earnings. The reclassification applies only to those stranded tax effects arising from the TCJA enactment. Certain disclosures related to the stranded tax effects, including a description of the accounting policy for releasing income tax effects from AOCI, are required.
For all entities, this guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period. The amendments should be applied either in the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate in the TCJA is recognized.
The Registrants are currently assessing this guidance and the period in which they will adopt it.



238




SCHEDULE I - PPL CORPORATION
CONDENSED UNCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(Millions of Dollars, except share data)
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Operating Revenues$
 $
 $
$
 $
 $
          
Operating Expenses          
Other operation and maintenance2
 9
 16
2
 2
 9
Total Operating Expenses2
 9
 16
2
 2
 9
          
Operating Loss(2) (9) (16)(2) (2) (9)
          
Other Income (Expense) - net          
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries1,915
 711
 1,776
1,175
 1,915
 711
Other income (expense)(1) (15) (18)(1) (1) (15)
Total1,914
 696
 1,758
1,174
 1,914
 696
          
Interest Expense8
 9
 15
8
 8
 9
          
Interest Expense with Affiliates10
 10
 10
16
 10
 10
          
Income Before Income Taxes1,894
 668
 1,717
1,148
 1,894
 668
          
Income Taxes(8) (14) (20)20
 (8) (14)
          
Net Income$1,902
 $682
 $1,737
$1,128
 $1,902
 $682
          
Total other comprehensive income (loss)356
 (1,050) (430)
     
Comprehensive Income Attributable to PPL Shareowners$852
 $252
 $1,028
$1,484
 $852
 $252
          
Earnings Per Share of Common Stock:          
Net Income Available to PPL Common Shareowners:          
Basic$2.80
 $1.01
 $2.64
$1.64
 $2.80
 $1.01
Diluted$2.79
 $1.01
 $2.61
$1.64
 $2.79
 $1.01
Weighted-Average Shares of Common Stock Outstanding (in thousands)          
Basic677,592
 669,814
 653,504
685,240
 677,592
 669,814
Diluted680,446
 672,586
 665,973
687,334
 680,446
 672,586

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Unconsolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.


239




SCHEDULE I - PPL CORPORATION
CONDENSED UNCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(Millions of Dollars)

2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Cash Flows from Operating Activities          
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$1,563
 $993
 $1,633
$1,108
 $1,563
 $993
          
Cash Flows from Investing Activities          
Capital contributions to affiliated subsidiaries(308) (491) (1,045)(585) (308) (491)
Return of capital from affiliated subsidiaries
 112
 247

 
 112
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities(308) (379) (798)(585) (308) (379)
          
Cash Flows from Financing Activities          
Issuance of equity, net of issuance costs144
 203
 1,074
453
 144
 203
Net increase (decrease) in short-term debt with affiliates(341) 215
 (913)113
 (341) 215
Payment of common stock dividends(1,030) (1,004) (967)(1,072) (1,030) (1,004)
Contract adjustment payments on Equity Units
 
 (22)
Other(24) (28) (7)(21) (24) (28)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities(1,251) (614) (835)(527) (1,251) (614)
          
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents 
  
  
 
  
  
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period
 
 
4
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period$4
 $
 $
$
 $4
 $
          
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:          
Cash Dividends Received from Subsidiaries$1,510
 $1,198
 $1,388
$1,253
 $1,510
 $1,198

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Unconsolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.


240




SCHEDULE I - PPL CORPORATION   
CONDENSED UNCONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT DECEMBER 31,
(Millions of Dollars, shares in thousands)
2016 20152017 2016
Assets      
      
Current Assets      
Cash and cash equivalents$4
 $
$
 $4
Accounts Receivable      
Other7
 10
7
 7
Affiliates10
 20
17
 10
Price risk management assets63
 139
196
 63
Total Current Assets84
 169
220
 84
      
Investments      
Affiliated companies at equity10,160
 10,479
11,141
 10,160
      
Other Noncurrent Assets      
Deferred income taxes70
 100
46
 70
Price risk management assets284
 133
186
 284
Other noncurrent assets1
 1
1
 1
Total Other Noncurrent Assets355
 234
233
 355
      
Total Assets$10,599
 $10,882
$11,594
 $10,599
      
      
Liabilities and Equity      
      
Current Liabilities      
Short-term debt with affiliates$44
 $385
$157
 $44
Accounts payable with affiliates30
 16
2
 30
Dividends259
 255
273
 259
Price risk management liabilities237
 268
233
 237
Other current liabilities20
 
19
 20
Total Current Liabilities590
 924
684
 590
      
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities110
 39
149
 110
      
Equity      
Common stock - $0.01 par value (a)7
 7
7
 7
Additional paid-in capital9,841
 9,687
10,305
 9,841
Earnings reinvested3,829
 2,953
3,871
 3,829
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(3,778) (2,728)(3,422) (3,778)
Total Equity9,899
 9,919
10,761
 9,899
      
Total Liabilities and Equity$10,599
 $10,882
$11,594
 $10,599
 
(a)1,560,000 shares authorized; 693,398 and 679,731 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016; 780,000 shares authorized; 673,857 shares issued2017 and outstanding at December 31, 2015.2016.

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Unconsolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.


241





SCHEDULE I - PPL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED UNCONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Basis of Presentation
 
PPL Corporation is a holding company and conducts substantially all of its business operations through its subsidiaries. Substantially all of its consolidated assets are held by such subsidiaries. PPL Corporation uses the equity method to account for its investments in entities in which it has a controlling financial interest. PPL Corporation's cash flow and its ability to meet its obligations are largely dependent upon the earnings of these subsidiaries and the distribution or other payment of such earnings to it in the form of dividends, loans or advances or repayment of loans and advances from it. These condensed financial statements and related footnotes have been prepared in accordance with Reg. §210.12-04 of Regulation S-X. These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of PPL Corporation.
 
PPL Corporation indirectly or directly owns all of the ownership interests of its significant subsidiaries. PPL Corporation relies on dividends or loans from its subsidiaries to fund PPL Corporation's dividends to its common shareowners and to meet its other cash requirements. See Note 7 to PPL Corporation's consolidated financial statements for discussions related to restricted net assets of its subsidiaries for the purposes of transferring funds to PPL in the form of distributions, loans or advances.
 
Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes
Effective October 1, 2015, PPL Corporation retrospectively adopted accounting guidance to simplify the presentation of deferred taxes which requires that deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet.
The adoption of this guidance required PPL Corporation to reclassify deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities from current to noncurrent on the balance sheet, and did not have a significant impact.

2. Commitments and Contingencies
 
See Note 13 to PPL Corporation's consolidated financial statements for commitments and contingencies of its subsidiaries.
 
Guarantees and Other Assurances
 
PPL Corporation's subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities and have no obligation to pay any amounts that may become due under PPL Corporation's guarantees or other assurances or to make any funds available for such payment.
 
PPL Corporation fully and unconditionally guarantees the payment of principal, premium and interest on all of the debt securities of PPL Capital Funding. The estimated maximum potential amount of future payments that could be required under the guarantees at December 31, 20162017 was $8.6$9.7 billion. These guarantees will expire in 2073. The probability of expected payment under these guarantees is remote.



242




SCHEDULE I - LG&E and KU Energy LLC
CONDENSED UNCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(Millions of Dollars)
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Other Income (Expense) - net          
Equity in Earnings of Subsidiaries$452
 $390
 $368
$397
 $452
 $390
Interest Income with Affiliate9
 4
 5
14
 9
 4
Total461
 394
 373
411
 461
 394
          
Interest Expense29
 39
 41
30
 29
 39
          
Interest Expense with Affiliate18
 5
 3
20
 18
 5
          
Income Before Income Taxes414
 350
 329
361
 414
 350
          
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)(15) (14) (15)45
 (15) (14)
          
Net Income Attributable to Member$429
 $364
 $344
Net Income$316
 $429
 $364
     
Total other comprehensive loss(18) (24) (1)
          
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Member$405
 $363
 $286
$298
 $405
 $363

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Unconsolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.


243




SCHEDULE I - LG&E and KU Energy LLC
CONDENSED UNCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(Millions of Dollars)
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Cash Flows from Operating Activities          
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$285
 $246
 $(183)$401
 $285
 $246
          
Cash Flows from Investing Activities 
  
  
 
  
  
Capital contributions to affiliated subsidiaries(91) (140) (248)(30) (91) (140)
Net decrease (increase) in notes receivable from affiliates47
 73
 555
(28) 47
 73
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities(44) (67) 307
(58) (44) (67)
          
Cash Flows from Financing Activities 
  
  
 
  
  
Net increase (decrease) in notes payable with affiliates90
 315
 58
58
 90
 315
Net increase (decrease) in short-term debt(75) 
 

 (75) 
Retirement of long-term debt
 (400) 

 
 (400)
Contribution from member61
 125
 248

 61
 125
Distribution to member(316) (219) (436)(402) (316) (219)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities(240) (179) (130)(344) (240) (179)
          
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents1
 
 (6)(1) 1
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period
 
 6
1
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period$1
 $
 $
$
 $1
 $
          
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: 
  
  
 
  
  
Cash Dividends Received from Subsidiaries$376
 $272
 $260
$418
 $376
 $272

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Unconsolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.


244




SCHEDULE I - LG&E and KU Energy LLC
CONDENSED UNCONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT DECEMBER 31,
(Millions of Dollars)
2016 20152017 2016
Assets 
  
 
  
Current Assets 
  
 
  
Cash and cash equivalents$1
 $
$
 $1
Accounts receivable
 1
1
 
Accounts receivable from affiliates23
 3
8
 23
Income taxes receivable31
 
1
 31
Notes receivable from affiliates1,007
 1,054
1,035
 1,007
Total Current Assets1,062
 1,058
1,045
 1,062
      
Investments 
  
 
  
Affiliated companies at equity5,219
 5,076
5,209
 5,219
      
Other Noncurrent Assets 
  
 
  
Deferred income taxes227
 228
263
 227
      
Total Assets$6,508
 $6,362
$6,517
 $6,508
      
Liabilities and Equity 
  
 
  
      
Current Liabilities 
  
 
  
Short-term debt$
 $75
Notes payable to affiliates179
 69
$241
 $179
Accounts payable to affiliates450
 469
469
 450
Taxes
 3
35
 
Other current liabilities6
 5
5
 6
Total Current Liabilities635
 621
750
 635
      
Long-term Debt 
  
 
  
Long-term debt721
 720
722
 721
Notes payable to affiliates480
 500
476
 480
Total Long-term Debt1,201
 1,220
1,198
 1,201
      
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities5
 4
6
 5
      
Equity4,667
 4,517
4,563
 4,667
      
Total Liabilities and Equity$6,508
 $6,362
$6,517
 $6,508

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Unconsolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.


245




Schedule I - LG&E and KU Energy LLC
Notes to Condensed Unconsolidated Financial Statements
 
1. Basis of Presentation

LG&E and KU Energy LLC (LKE) is a holding company and conducts substantially all of its business operations through its subsidiaries. Substantially all of its consolidated assets are held by such subsidiaries. LKE uses the equity method to account for its investments in entities in which it has a controlling financial interest. LKE's cash flow and its ability to meet its obligations are largely dependent upon the earnings of these subsidiaries and the distribution or other payment of such earnings to it in the form of dividends or repayment of loans and advances from the subsidiaries. These condensed financial statements and related footnotes have been prepared in accordance with Reg. §210.12-04 of Regulation S-X. These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of LKE.
 
LKE indirectly or directly owns all of the ownership interests of its significant subsidiaries. LKE relies primarily on dividends from its subsidiaries to fund LKE's distributions to its member and to meet its other cash requirements. See Note 7 to LKE's consolidated financial statements for discussions related to restricted net assets of its subsidiaries for the purposes of transferring funds to LKE in the form of distributions, loans or advances.
 
2. Commitments and Contingencies

See Note 13 to LKE's consolidated financial statements for commitments and contingencies of its subsidiaries.
 
Guarantees
 
LKE provides certain indemnifications covering the due and punctual payment, performance and discharge by each party of its respective obligations. The most comprehensive of these guarantees is the LKE guarantee covering operational, regulatory and environmental commitments and indemnifications made by WKE under a 2009 Transaction Termination Agreement. This guarantee has a term of 12 years ending July 2021, and a maximum exposure of $200 million, exclusive of certain items such as government fines and penalties that may exceed the maximum. Another WKE-related LKE guarantee coversformerly covered other indemnifications related to the purchase price of excess power, hashad a term expiring in 2023, and a maximum exposure of $100 million. In May 2012, LKE's indemnitee received an unfavorable arbitration panel's decision interpreting this matter. In October 2014, LKE's indemnitee filed a motion for discretionary review with the Kentucky Supreme Court seeking to overturn the arbitration decision,million, which excess power matter and such motion was denied by the court in September 2015. In September 2015, the counterparty issued a demand letter to LKE's indemnitee. In February 2016, the counterparty filed a complaint in Henderson, Kentucky Circuit Court, seeking an award of damages in the matter. The proceeding is currently in the discovery phase. LKE does not believe appropriate contractual, legal or commercial grounds exist for the claim made. LKE believes its indemnification obligations in the WKE matter remain subject to various uncertainties, including additional legal and contractual developments, as well as future prices, availability and demand forrelated indemnifications had been the subject excess power. Althoughof a dispute and legal proceeding among the parties. In December 2017, the parties have also conducted certainexecuted settlement discussions,agreements which resolved all claims relating to the ultimate outcomes of the WKE termination-related indemnifications cannot be predicted at this time.excess power matter, and terminated such guarantee, for $11 million.

Additionally, LKE has indemnified various third parties related to historical obligations for other divested subsidiaries and affiliates. The indemnifications vary by entity and the maximum exposures range from being capped at the sale price to no specified maximum. LKE could be required to perform on these indemnifications in the event of covered losses or liabilities being claimed by an indemnified party. LKE cannot predict the ultimate outcomes of the various indemnification scenarios, but does not expect such outcomes to result in significant losses above the amounts recorded.

3. Long-Term Debt

See Note 7 to LKE's consolidated financial statements for the terms of LKE's outstanding senior unsecured notes outstanding. Of the total outstanding, $475 million matures in 2020 and $250 million matures in 2021. These maturities are based on stated maturities. Also see Note 7 to LKE's consolidated financial statements for the terms of LKE's $400 million note payable to PPL.a PPL affiliate. This note matures in 2025.2026. LKE's $80$76 million note payable to LG&E and KU Services Company bears a variable interest rate, which resets each quarter based on LIBOR. The rate at December 31, 20162017 was 1.381%2.1%. This note matures in 2019.



246




QUARTERLY FINANCIAL, COMMON STOCK PRICE AND DIVIDEND DATA (Unaudited)
PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Millions of Dollars, except per share data)
For the Quarters Ended (a)For the Quarters Ended (a)
March 31 June 30 Sept. 30 Dec. 31
2017       
Operating revenues$1,951
 $1,725
 $1,845
 $1,926
Operating income796
 702
 777
 793
Net income403
 292
 355
 78
Net income available to PPL common shareowners: (b) 
  
  
  
Basic EPS0.59
 0.43
 0.52
 0.11
Diluted EPS0.59
 0.43
 0.51
 0.11
Dividends declared per share of common stock (c)0.3950
 0.3950
 0.3950
 0.3950
Price per common share: 
  
  
  
High$37.70
 $40.06
 $39.83
 $38.37
Low33.94
 37.11
 37.36
 30.76
March 31 June 30 Sept. 30 Dec. 31       
2016              
Operating revenues$2,011
 $1,785
 $1,889
 $1,832
$2,011
 $1,785
 $1,889
 $1,832
Operating income823
 725
 786
 714
823
 725
 786
 714
Net income481
 483
 473
 465
481
 483
 473
 465
Net income available to PPL common shareowners: (c) 
  
  
  
Net income available to PPL common shareowners: (b) 
  
  
  
Basic EPS0.71
 0.71
 0.70
 0.68
0.71
 0.71
 0.70
 0.68
Diluted EPS0.71
 0.71
 0.69
 0.68
0.71
 0.71
 0.69
 0.68
Dividends declared per share of common stock (d)0.38
 0.38
 0.38
 0.38
Dividends declared per share of common stock (c)0.38
 0.38
 0.38
 0.38
Price per common share: 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
High$38.07
 $39.68
 $37.71
 $34.74
$38.07
 $39.68
 $37.71
 $34.74
Low32.80
 36.27
 33.63
 32.19
32.80
 36.27
 33.63
 32.19
       
2015       
Operating revenues$2,230
 $1,781
 $1,878
 $1,780
Operating income890
 638
 686
 617
Income from continuing operations after income taxes552
 250
 396
 405
Income (loss) from discontinued operations (net of income taxes) (d)(e)95
 (1,007) (3) (6)
Net income (b)647
 (757) 393
 399
Income from continuing operations after income taxes available to 
  
  
  
PPL common shareowners: (c) 
  
  
  
Basic EPS0.83
 0.37
 0.59
 0.60
Diluted EPS0.82
 0.37
 0.59
 0.60
Net income (loss) available to PPL common shareowners: (c) 
  
  
  
Basic EPS0.97
 (1.13) 0.58
 0.59
Diluted EPS0.96
 (1.13) 0.58
 0.59
Dividends declared per share of common stock (d)0.3725
 0.3725
 0.3775
 0.3775
Price per common share: 
  
  
  
High$36.38
 $34.85
 $33.58
 $34.75
Low31.40
 29.45
 29.41
 32.60

(a)Quarterly results can vary depending on, among other things, weather. Accordingly, comparisons among quarters of a year may not be indicative of overall trends and changes in operations.
(b)The second quarter of 2015 includes a loss of $879 million from the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply. See Note 8 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
(c)The sum of the quarterly amounts may not equal annual earnings per share due to changes in the number of common shares outstanding during the year or rounding.
(d)(c)PPL has paid quarterly cash dividends on its common stock in every year since 1946. Future dividends, declared at the discretion of the Board of Directors, will be dependent upon future earnings, cash flows, financial requirements and other factors.
(e)In the second quarter of 2015, PPL completed the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply substantially representing PPL's Supply segment. Accordingly, the previously reported operating results for PPL's Supply segment have been reclassified as discontinued operations. See Note 8 to the Financial Statements for additional information.




247




QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (Unaudited)
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Millions of Dollars)
For the Quarters Ended (a)For the Quarters Ended (a)
March 31 June 30 Sept. 30 Dec. 31
2017       
Operating revenues$573
 $500
 $547
 $575
Operating income159
 156
 189
 197
Net income79
 77
 95
 111
March 31 June 30 Sept. 30 Dec. 31       
2016              
Operating revenues$585
 $495
 $539
 $537
$585
 $495
 $539
 $537
Operating income180
 154
 176
 154
180
 154
 176
 154
Net income94
 79
 90
 77
94
 79
 90
 77
       
2015       
Operating revenues$630
 $476
 $519
 $499
Operating income175
 116
 121
 126
Net income87
 49
 55
 61
 
(a)PPL Electric's business is seasonal in nature, with peak sales periods generally occurring in the winter and summer months. Accordingly, comparisons among quarters of a year may not be indicative of overall trends and changes in operations.



248




ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
 
PPL Corporation, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company
 
None.
 
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a)Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

PPL Corporation, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company

The Registrants' principal executive officers and principal financial officers, based on their evaluation of the Registrants' disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) have concluded that, as of December 31, 2016,2017, the Registrants' disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that material information relating to the Registrants and their consolidated subsidiaries is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC's rules and forms, particularly during the period for which this annual report has been prepared. The aforementioned principal officers have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are also effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive officers and principal financial officers, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b)Changes in internal control over financial reporting.

PPL Corporation, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company, and Kentucky Utilities Company

The Registrants' principal executive officers and principal financial officers have concluded that there were no changes in the Registrants' internal control over financial reporting during the Registrants' fourth fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants' internal control over financial reporting.

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

PPL Corporation

PPL's management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f). PPL's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance to PPL's management and Board of Directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
 
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in "Internal Control - Integrated Framework" (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in "Internal Control - Integrated Framework" (2013), our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective December 31, 2016.2017. The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report contained on page 90.95.

PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company

Management of PPL's non-accelerated filer companies, PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU, are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f). Each of the aforementioned companies' internal control over financial reporting is a process


249




designed to provide reasonable assurance to management and Board of Directors of these companies regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
 
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the principal executive officers and principal financial officers of the companies listed above, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in "Internal Control - Integrated Framework" (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in "Internal Control - Integrated Framework" (2013), management of these companies concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016.2017. This annual report does not include an attestation report of Deloitte & Touche LLP, the companies' independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting for these non-accelerated filer companies. The effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting for the aforementioned companies was not subject to attestation by the companies' registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit these companies to provide only management's report in this annual report.
 
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

PPL Corporation, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company

None.
 
PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
 
PPL Corporation
 
Additional information for this item will be set forth in the sections entitled "Nominees for Directors," "Board Committees - Board Committee Membership" and "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" in PPL's 20172018 Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after December 31, 2016,2017, and which information is incorporated herein by reference. There have been no changes to the procedures by which shareowners may recommend nominees to PPL's board of directors since the filing with the SEC of PPL's 20162017 Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement.

PPL has adopted a code of ethics entitled "Standards of Integrity" that applies to all directors, managers, trustees, officers (including the principal executive officers, principal financial officers and principal accounting officers (each, a "principal officer")), employees and agents of PPL and PPL's subsidiaries for which it has operating control (PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU). The "Standards of Integrity" are posted on PPL's Internet website: www.pplweb.com/Standards-of-Integrity. A description of any amendment to the "Standards of Integrity" (other than a technical, administrative or other non-substantive amendment) will be posted on PPL's Internet website within four business days following the date of the amendment. In addition, if a waiver constituting a material departure from a provision of the "Standards of Integrity" is granted to one of the principal officers, a description of the nature of the waiver, the name of the person to whom the waiver was granted and the date of the waiver will be posted on PPL's Internet website within four business days following the date of the waiver.
 
PPL also has adopted its "Guidelines for Corporate Governance," which address, among other things, director qualification standards and director and board committee responsibilities. These guidelines, and the charters of each of the committees of PPL's board of directors, are posted on PPL's Internet website: www.pplweb.com/Guidelines and www.pplweb.com/board-committees.
 
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company
 
Item 10 is omitted as PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU meet the conditions set forth in General Instruction (I)(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K.


250





EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANTS
 
Officers of the Registrants are elected annually by their Boards of Directors to serve at the pleasure of the respective Boards. There are no family relationships among any of the executive officers, nor is there any arrangement or understanding between any executive officer and any other person pursuant to which the officer was selected.
 
There have been no events under any bankruptcy act, no criminal proceedings and no judgments or injunctions material to the evaluation of the ability and integrity of any executive officer during the past five years.
 
Listed below are the executive officers at December 31, 2016.2017.
 
PPL Corporation
Name Age Positions Held During the Past Five Years Dates
William H. Spence 5960 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer April 2012 - present
    President and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 2011 - March 2012
   
Joanne H. Raphael 5758 Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary June 2015 - present
    Senior Vice President and Chief External Affairs Officer-PPL Services October 2012 - May 2015
    Vice President-External Affairs-PPL ServicesJuly 2000 - September 2012
   
Vincent Sorgi 4546 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer June 2014 - present
    Vice President and Controller March 2010 - June 2014
       
Gregory N. Dudkin (a) 5960 President-PPL Electric March 2012 - present
    Senior Vice President-Operations-PPL ElectricJune 2009 - March 2012
   
Victor A. Staffieri (a) (b) 6162Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer-LKEJanuary 2017 - present
 Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President-LKE May 2001 - December 2016
Paul W. Thompson (a)60President and Chief Operating Officer-LKEJanuary 2017 - present
Chief Operating Officer-LKEFebruary 2013 - December 2016
       
Robert A. Symons (a) 6364 Chief Executive-WPD January 2000 - present
       
Joseph P. Bergstein, Jr. (b) 4647 Vice President-Investor Relations and Treasurer January 2016 - presentDecember 31, 2017
    Vice President-Investor Relations and Financial Planning-PPL Services February 2015 - December 2015
    Investor Relations Vice President-PPL Services April 2012 - February 2015
    Investor Relations Director-PPL ServicesJune 2010 - April 2012
   
Stephen K. Breininger 4344 Vice President and Controller January 2015 - present
    Controller June 2014 - January 2015
    Assistant Controller-Business Lines March 2013 - June 2014
    Controller-Supply Accounting April 2010 - March 2013
 
(a)Designated an executive officer of PPL by virtue of their respective positions at a PPL subsidiary.
(b)Effective January 3, 2017, Paul W. Thompson1, 2018, Tadd J. Henninger was elected Vice President and Chief Operating OfficerTreasurer of LKEPPL and was deemed to be an Executive Officerexecutive officer of PPL as of that date. Mr. Staffieri'sBergstein's title changed on that date to ChairmanVice President-Investor Relations and Corporate Development & Planning of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of LKE.PPL.



251




ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 

PPL Corporation
 
Information for this item will be set forth in the sections entitled "Compensation of Directors," "The Board's Role in Risk Oversight," "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation" and "Executive Compensation" in PPL's 20172018 Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after December 31, 2016,2017, and which information is incorporated herein by reference.


 
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company
 
Item 11 is omitted as PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU meet the conditions set forth in General Instructions (I)(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K.
 
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
 
PPL Corporation
 
Information for this item will be set forth in the section entitled "Stock Ownership" in PPL's 20172018 Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after December 31, 2016,2017, and which information is incorporated herein by reference. In addition, provided below in tabular format is information as of December 31, 2016,2017, with respect to compensation plans (including individual compensation arrangements) under which equity securities of PPL are authorized for issuance.

 Equity Compensation Plan Information
Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options, warrants
and rights (3)
Weighted-average exercise
price of outstanding options,
warrants and rights (3)
Number of securities
remaining available for future
issuance under equity
compensation plans (4)
Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options, warrants
and rights (3)
Weighted-average exercise
price of outstanding options,
warrants and rights (3)
Number of securities
remaining available for future
issuance under equity
compensation plans (4)
Equity compensation     
      
 
plans approved by591,666
– ICP$38.02
– ICP1,769,939
– DDCP495,422
– ICP$39.88
– ICP1,720,050
– DDCP
security holders (1)
1,368,385
– SIP$26.22
– SIP5,946,135
– SIP1,329,058
– SIP$26.21
– SIP10,506,026
– SIP
2,521,109
– ICPKE$28.36
– ICPKE1,531,659
– ICPKE1,937,703
– ICPKE$28.95
– ICPKE1,598,811
– ICPKE
4,481,160
– Total$28.98
– Combined9,247,733
– Total3,762,183
– Total$29.42
– Combined13,824,887
– Total
            
Equity compensation            
plans not approved by            
security holders (2)
            
 
(1)Includes (a) the ICP, under which stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance units, dividend equivalents and other stock-based awards were awarded to executive officers of PPL and no awards remain for issuance under this plan; (b) the ICPKE, under which stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance units, dividend equivalents and other stock-based awards may be awarded to non-executive key employees of PPL and its subsidiaries; (c) the PPL 2012 SIP approved by shareowners in 2012 under which stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance units, dividend equivalents and other stock-based awards may be awarded to executive officers of PPL and its subsidiaries; and (d) the DDCP, under which stock units may be awarded to directors of PPL. See Note 10 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
(2)All of PPL's current compensation plans under which equity securities of PPL are authorized for issuance have been approved by PPL's shareowners.
(3)Relates to common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options awarded under the ICP, SIP and ICPKE as of December 31, 2016.2017. In addition, as of December 31, 2016,2017, the following other securities had been awarded and are outstanding under the ICP, SIP, ICPKE and DDCP:  15,000 shares of restricted stock under the ICP; 644,169602,975 restricted stock units, 643,372 TSR performance awards and 740,81767,916 ROE performance unitsawards under the SIP; 1,540,193941,524 restricted stock units 376,265 TSR performance awards and 559,91529,013 ROE performance unitsawards under the ICPKE; and 385,167425,859 stock units under the DDCP.


252




(4)Based upon the following aggregate award limitations under the ICP, SIP, ICPKE and DDCP: (a) under the ICP, 15,769,431 awards (i.e., 5% of the total PPL common stock outstanding as of April 23, 1999) granted after April 23, 1999; (b) under the SIP, 10,000,00015,000,000 awards; (c) under the ICPKE, 16,573,608 awards (i.e., 5% of the total PPL common stock outstanding as of January 1, 2003) granted after April 25, 2003, reduced by outstanding awards for which common stock was not yet issued as of such date of 2,373,812 resulting in a limit of 14,199,796; and (d) under the DDCP, the number of stock units available for issuance was reduced to 2,000,000 stock units in March 2012. In addition, each of the ICP and ICPKE includes an annual award limitation of 2% of total PPL common stock outstanding as of January 1 of each year.



PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company
 
Item 12 is omitted as PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU meet the conditions set forth in General Instructions (I)(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K.
 
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
 
PPL Corporation
 
Information for this item will be set forth in the sections entitled "Transactions with Related Persons" and "Independence of Directors" in PPL's 20172018 Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after December 31, 2016,2017, and is incorporated herein by reference.
 
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company
 
Item 13 is omitted as PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU meet the conditions set forth in General Instructions (I)(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K.
 
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

PPL Corporation
 
Information for this item will be set forth in the section entitled "Fees to Independent Auditor for 20162017 and 2015"2016" in PPL's 20172018 Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after December 31, 2016,2017, and which information is incorporated herein by reference.
 
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation
 
For the fiscal year ended 2017 and 2016, Deloitte & Touche LLP (Deloitte) served as PPL Electric's independent auditor. For the fiscal year ended 2015, Ernst & Young LLP (EY) served as PPL Electric's independent auditor. The following table presents an allocation of fees billed, including expenses, by the independent auditor to PPL Electric, for professional services rendered for the audit of PPL Electric's annual financial statements and for fees billed for other services rendered by Deloitte and EY.Deloitte.
2016 20152017 2016
(in thousands)
(in thousands)
Audit fees (a)$1,104
 $1,185
$1,086
 $1,104
Audit-related fees (b)
 11
28
 
All other fees (c)253
 
 
(a)Includes estimated fees for audit of annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in PPL Electric's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and for services in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements, including comfort letters and consents for financings and filings made with the SEC.
(b)Includes fees for agreed upon procedures related to Annual EPA filings.
(c)Fees for a systems portfolio analysis.



253




LG&E and KU Energy LLC
 
For the fiscal yearyears ended 2017 and 2016, Deloitte served as LKE's independent auditor. For the fiscal year ended 2015, EY served as LKE's independent auditor. The following table presents an allocation of fees billed, including expenses, by the independent auditor to LKE, for professional services rendered for the audits of LKE's annual financial statements and for fees billed for other services rendered by Deloitte and EY.Deloitte.
 2016 2015
 
(in thousands)
Audit fees (a)$1,767
 $1,758
 2017 2016
 
(in thousands)
Audit fees (a)$1,717
 $1,767
 
(a)Includes estimated fees for audit of annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in LKE's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and for services in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements, including comfort letters and consents for financings and filings made with the SEC.



Louisville Gas and Electric Company
 
For the fiscal yearyears ended 2017 and 2016, Deloitte served as LG&E's independent auditor. For the fiscal year ended 2015, EY served as LG&E's independent auditor. The following table presents an allocation of fees billed, including expenses, by the independent auditor to LG&E, for professional services rendered for the audits of LG&E's annual financial statements and for fees billed for other services rendered by Deloitte and EY.Deloitte. 
 2016 2015
 
(in thousands)
Audit fees (a)$814
 $718
 2017 2016
 
(in thousands)
Audit fees (a)$826
 $814
 
(a)Includes estimated fees for audit of annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in LG&E's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and for services in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements, including comfort letters and consents for financings and filings made with the SEC.

Kentucky Utilities Company
 
For the fiscal yearyears ended 2017 and 2016, Deloitte served as KU's independent auditor. For the fiscal year ended 2015, EY served as KU's independent auditor. The following table presents an allocation of fees billed, including expenses, by the independent auditor to KU, for professional services rendered for the audits of KU's annual financial statements and for fees billed for other services rendered by Deloitte and EY.Deloitte.
  2016 2015
  
(in thousands)
Audit fees (a) $936
 $717
  2017 2016
  
(in thousands)
Audit fees (a) $874
 $936
 
(a)Includes estimated fees for audit of annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in KU's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and for services in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements, including comfort letters and consents for financings and filings made with the SEC.

PPL Corporation, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company
 
Approval of Fees. The Audit Committee of PPL has procedures for pre-approving audit and non-audit services to be provided by the independent auditor. These procedures are designed to ensure the continued independence of the independent auditor. More specifically, the use of the independent auditor to perform either audit or non-audit services is prohibited unless specifically approved in advance by the Audit Committee of PPL. As a result of this approval process, the Audit Committee of PPL has pre-approved specific categories of services and authorization levels. All services outside of the specified categories and all amounts exceeding the authorization levels are approved by the Chair of the Audit Committee of PPL, who serves as the Committee designee to review and approve audit and non-audit related services during the year. A listing of the approved audit and non-audit services is reviewed with the full Audit Committee of PPL no later than its next meeting.
 
The Audit Committee of PPL approved 100% of the 20162017 and 20152016 services provided by Deloitte and EY.Deloitte.



254




PART IV

 
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

PPL Corporation, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company

(a)  The following documents are filed as part of this report:

1.Financial Statements - Refer to the "Table of Contents" for an index of the financial statements included in this report.

2.Supplementary Data and Supplemental Financial Statement Schedule - included in response to Item 8.

Schedule I - PPL Corporation Condensed Unconsolidated Financial Statements.
    
Schedule I - LG&E and KU Energy LLC Condensed Unconsolidated Financial Statements.

All other schedules are omitted because of the absence of the conditions under which they are required or because the required information is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.

3.Exhibits

See Exhibit Index immediately following the signature pages. 



255




SHAREOWNER AND INVESTOR INFORMATION
 
 
Annual Meeting: The 20172018 annual meeting of shareowners of PPL will be held on Wednesday, May 17, 2017,16, 2018, at The KentuckyPPL Center, for the Performing Arts, Bomhard Theatre, 501 W. Main701 Hamilton Street, Louisville, Kentucky.Allentown, Pennsylvania.
 
Proxy Statement Material: A proxy statement and notice of PPL's annual meeting will be provided to all shareowners who are holders of record as of February 28, 2017.2018. The latest proxy statement can be accessed at www.pplweb.com/PPLCorpProxy.
 
PPL Annual Report: The report will be published in the beginning of April and will be provided to all shareowners who are holders of record as of February 28, 2017.2018. The latest annual report can be accessed at www.pplweb.com/PPLCorpProxy.
 
Dividends: Subject to the declaration of dividends on PPL common stock by the PPL Board of Directors or its Executive Committee, dividends are paid on the first business day of April, July, October and January. The 20172018 record dates for dividends are expected to be March 10,9, June 9,8, September 810 and December 8.10.
 
PPL's Website (www.pplweb.com): Shareowners can access PPL publications such as annual and quarterly reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC Forms 10-K and 10-Q), other PPL filings, corporate governance materials, news releases, stock quotes and historical performance. Visitors to our website can subscribe to receive automated email alerts for SEC filings, earnings releases, daily stock prices or other financial news.
 
Financial reports which are available at www.pplweb.com will be mailed without charge upon request by writing to:
PPL Treasury Dept.
Two North Ninth Street
Allentown, PA 18101
Via email: invserv@pplweb.com
or by calling:
Shareowner Services, toll-free at 1-800-345-3085; or
PPL Corporate Offices at 610-774-5151.
 
Online Account Access: Registered shareowners can activate their account for online access by visiting shareowneronline.com.
 
Dividend Reinvestment and Direct Stock Purchase Planand Dividend Reinvestment Plans (Plan): PPL offers investors the opportunity to acquire shares of PPL common stock through its Plan. Through the Plan, participants are eligible to invest up to $25,000 per calendar month in PPL common stock. Shareowners may choose to have dividends on their PPL common stock fully or partially reinvested in PPL common stock or can receive full payment of cash dividends by check or electronic funds transfer. Participants in the Plan may choose to have their common stock certificates deposited into their Plan account.
 
Direct Registration System: PPL participates in the Direct Registration System (DRS). Shareowners may choose to have their common stock certificates converted to book entry form within the DRS by submitting their certificates to PPL's transfer agent.
 
Listed Securities:
 
New York Stock Exchange
 
PPL Corporation:
Common Stock (Code: PPL)
 
PPL Capital Funding, Inc.:
2007 Series A Junior Subordinated Notes due 2067 (Code: PPL/67)
2013 Series B Junior Subordinated Notes due 2073 (Code: PPX)



256




Fiscal Agents:
 
Transfer Agent and Registrar; Dividend Disbursing Agent; Plan Administrator
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Equiniti Trust Company
Shareowner Services
1110 Centre Pointe Curve, Suite 101
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
 
Toll Free: 1-800-345-3085
Outside U.S.: 651-453-2129651-450-4064
Website: shareowneronline.com
 
Indenture Trustee
The Bank of New York Mellon
Corporate Trust Administration
500 Ross Street
Pittsburgh, PA 15262



257




EXHIBIT INDEX
The following Exhibits indicated by an asterisk preceding the Exhibit number are filed herewith. The balance of the Exhibits has heretofore been filed with the Commission and pursuant to Rule 12(b)-32 are incorporated herein by reference. Exhibits indicated by a [_] are filed or listed pursuant to Item 601(b)(10)(iii) of Regulation S-K.
-Securities Purchase and Registration Rights Agreement, dated March 5, 2014, among PPL Capital Funding, Inc., PPL Corporation, and the several purchasers named in Schedule B thereto (Exhibit 1.1 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated March 10, 2014)
-Equity Distribution Agreement, dated February 26, 2015, by and among PPL Corporation and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporation (Exhibit 1.1 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated February 26, 2015)
-Equity Distribution Agreement, dated February 26, 2015, by and among PPL Corporation and Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC (Exhibit 1.2 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated February 26, 2015)
-Final Terms, dated November 14, 2017, of Western Power Distribution (South West) plc £250,000,000 2.375% Notes due May 2029 (Exhibit 1.1 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated November 16, 2017)
-Separation Agreement among PPL Corporation, Talen Energy Holdings, Inc., Talen Energy Corporation, PPL Energy Supply, LLC, Raven Power Holdings LLC, C/R Energy Jade, LLC and Sapphire Power Holdings LLC., dated as of June 9, 2014 (Exhibit 2.1 to PPL Energy Supply, LLC Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-32944) dated June 12, 2014)
-Transaction Agreement among PPL Corporation, Talen Energy Holdings, Inc., Talen Energy Corporation, PPL Energy Supply, LLC, Talen Energy Merger Sub, Inc., C/R Energy Jade, LLC, Sapphire Power Holdings LLC. and Raven Power Holdings LLC, dated as of June 9, 2014 (Exhibit 2.2 to PPL Energy Supply, LLC Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-32944) dated June 12, 2014)
-Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of PPL Corporation, effective as of May 25, 2016 (Exhibit 3(i) to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated May 26, 2016)
-Bylaws of PPL Corporation, effective as of December 18, 2015 (Exhibit 3(ii) to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated December 21, 2015)
-Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, effective as of October 31, 2013 (Exhibit 3(a) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-905) for the quarter ended September 30, 2013)
-Bylaws of PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, effective as of October 27, 2015 (Exhibit 3(a) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended September 30, 2015)
-Articles of Organization of LG&E and KU Energy LLC, effective as of December 29, 2003 (Exhibit 3(a) to Registration Statement filed on Form S-4 (File No. 333-173665))
-Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of LG&E and KU Energy LLC, effective as of November  1, 2010 (Exhibit 3(b) to Registration Statement filed on Form S-4 (File No. 333-173665))
-Amendment to Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of LG&E and KU Energy LLC, effective as of November 25, 2013 (Exhibit 3(h)-2) to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2013)


258




-Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Louisville Gas and Electric Company, effective as of November 6, 1996 (Exhibit 3(a) to Registration Statement filed on Form S-4 (File No. 333-173676))
-Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of Louisville Gas and Electric Company, effective as of April 6, 2004 (Exhibit 3(b) to Registration Statement filed on Form S-4 (File No. 333-173676))
-Bylaws of Louisville Gas and Electric Company, effective as of December 16, 2003 (Exhibit 3(c) to Registration Statement filed on Form S-4 (File No. 333-173676))
-Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Kentucky Utilities Company, effective as of December 14, 1993 (Exhibit 3(a) to Registration Statement filed on Form S-4 (File No. 333-173675))
-Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of Kentucky Utilities Company, effective as of April 8, 2004 (Exhibit 3(b) to Registration Statement filed on Form S-4 (File No. 333-173675))
-Bylaws of Kentucky Utilities Company, effective as of December 16, 2003 (Exhibit 3(c) to Registration Statement filed on Form S-4 (File No. 333-173675))
-Amended and Restated Employee Stock Ownership Plan, dated December 1, 2016 (Exhibit 4(a) to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2016)
-Amendment No. 1 to PPL Employee Stock Ownership Plan, dated October 2, 2017 (Exhibit 4(c) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended September 30, 2017)
-Trust Deed constituting £150 million 9.25% percent Bonds due 2020, dated November 9, 1995, between South Wales Electric plc and Bankers Trustee Company Limited (Exhibit 4(k) to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2004)
-Indenture, dated as of November 1, 1997, among PPL Corporation, PPL Capital Funding, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank (formerly The Chase Manhattan Bank), as Trustee (Exhibit 4.1 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated November 12, 1997)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 8, dated as of June 14, 2012, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(b) to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated June 14, 2012)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 9, dated as of October 15, 2012, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(b) to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated October 15, 2012)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 10, dated as of May 24, 2013, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4.2 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated May 24, 2013)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 11, dated as of May 24, 2013, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4.3 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated May 24, 2013)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 12, dated as of May 24, 2013, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4.4 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated May 24, 2013)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 13, dated as of March 10, 2014, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4.2 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated March 10, 2014)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 14, dated as of March 10, 2014, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4.3 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated March 10, 2014)


259




-Supplemental Indenture No. 15, dated as of May 17, 2016, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(b) to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated May 17, 2016)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 16, dated as of September 8, 2017, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(b) to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated September 6, 2017)
-Indenture, dated as of March 16, 2001, among WPD Holdings UK, Bankers Trust Company, as Trustee, Principal Paying Agent, and Transfer Agent and Deutsche Bank Luxembourg, S.A., as Paying and Transfer Agent (Exhibit 4(g) to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2009)
-First Supplemental Indenture constituting the creation of $200 million 6.75% Notes due 2004, $200 million 6.875% Notes due 2007, $225 million 6.50% Notes due 2008, $100 million 7.25% Notes due 2017 and $300 million 7.375% Notes due 2028, dated as of March 16, 2001, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(n)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2004)
-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 30, 2003, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(n)-3 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2004)
-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 31, 2014, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(b) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended September 30, 2014)
-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 1, 2016 (Exhibit 4(d)-5 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2016)
-Indenture, dated as of August 1, 2001, by PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and JPMorgan Chase Bank (formerly The Chase Manhattan Bank), as Trustee (Exhibit 4.1 to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-905) dated August 21, 2001)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 6, dated as of December 1, 2005, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(a) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-905) dated December 22, 2005)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 7, dated as of August 1, 2007, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(b) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-905) dated August 14, 2007)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 9, dated as of October 1, 2008, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(c) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-905) dated October 31, 2008)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 10, dated as of May 1, 2009, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(b) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-905) dated May 22, 2009)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 11, dated as of July 1, 2011, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4.1 to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-905) dated July 13, 2011)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 12, dated as of July 1, 2011, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(a) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-905) dated July 18, 2011)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 13, dated as of August 1, 2011, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(a) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-905) dated August 23, 2011)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 14, dated as of August 1, 2012, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(a) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-905) dated August 24, 2012)


260




-Supplemental Indenture No. 15, dated as of July 1, 2013, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(a) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-905) dated July 11, 2013)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 16, dated as of June 1, 2014, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(a) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-905) dated June 5, 2014)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 17, dated as of October 1, 2015, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(a) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-905) dated October 1, 2015)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 18, dated as of March 1, 2016, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(c) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-905) dated March 10, 2016)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 19, dated as of May 1, 2017, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(a) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-905) dated May 11, 2017)
-Trust Deed constituting £200 million 5.875 percent Bonds due 2027, dated March 25, 2003, between Western Power Distribution (South West) plc and J.P. Morgan Corporate Trustee Services Limited (Exhibit 4(o)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2004)
-Supplement, dated May 27, 2003, to said Trust Deed, constituting £50 million 5.875 percent Bonds due 2027 (Exhibit 4(o)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2004)
-
Pollution Control Facilities Loan Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2008, between Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority and PPL Electric Utilities Corporation (Exhibit 4(a) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-905) dated October 31, 2008)

-Pollution Control Facilities Loan Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2016, between PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and the Lehigh County Industrial Development Authority (Exhibit 4(a) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-905) dated March 10, 2016)
-Pollution Control Facilities Loan Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2016, between PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and the Lehigh County Industrial Development Authority (Exhibit 4(b) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-905) dated March 10, 2016)
-Trust Deed constituting £105 million 1.541 percent Index-Linked Notes due 2053, dated December 1, 2006, between Western Power Distribution (South West) plc and HSBC Trustee (CI) Limited (Exhibit 4(i) to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2006)
-Trust Deed constituting £120 million 1.541 percent Index-Linked Notes due 2056, dated December 1, 2006, between Western Power Distribution (South West) plc and HSBC Trustee (CI) Limited (Exhibit 4(j) to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2006)
-Trust Deed constituting £225 million 4.80436 percent Notes due 2037, dated December 21, 2006, between Western Power Distribution (South Wales) plc and HSBC Trustee (CI) Limited (Exhibit 4(k) to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2006)
-Subordinated Indenture, dated as of March 1, 2007, between PPL Capital Funding, Inc., PPL Corporation and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (Exhibit 4(a) to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated March 20, 2007)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated as of March 1, 2007, to said Subordinated Indenture (Exhibit 4(b) to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated March 20, 2007)


261




-Supplemental Indenture No. 4, dated as of March 15, 2013, to said Subordinated Indenture (Exhibit 4(b) to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated March 15, 2013)
-Trust Deed constituting £200 million 5.75 percent Notes due 2040, dated March 23, 2010, between Western Power Distribution (South Wales) plc and HSBC Corporate Trustee Company (UK) Limited (Exhibit 4(a) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended March 31, 2010)
-Trust Deed constituting £200 million 5.75 percent Notes due 2040, dated March 23, 2010, between Western Power Distribution (South West) plc and HSBC Corporate Trustee Company (UK) Limited (Exhibit 4(b) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended March 31, 2010)
-Indenture, dated as of October 1, 2010, between Kentucky Utilities Company and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee (Exhibit 4(q)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated as of October 15, 2010, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(q)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 2, dated as of November 1, 2010, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(q)-3 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 3, dated as of November 1, 2013, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(b) to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated November 13, 2013)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 4, dated as of September 1, 2015, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(b) to Kentucky Utilities Company Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-3464) dated September 28, 2015)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 5, dated as of August 1, 2016, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(b) to Kentucky Utilities Company Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-3464) dated August 26, 2016)
-Indenture, dated as of October 1, 2010, between Louisville Gas and Electric Company and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee (Exhibit 4(r)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated as of October 15, 2010, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(r)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 2, dated as of November 1, 2010, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(r)-3 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 3, dated as of November 1, 2013, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(a) to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated November 13, 2013)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 4, dated as of September 1, 2015, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(a) to Louisville Gas and Electric Company Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-2893) dated September 28, 2015)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 5, dated as of September 1, 2016, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(b) to Louisville Gas and Electric Company Form 8-K (File No. 1-2893) dated September 15, 2016)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 6, dated as of May 15, 2017, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(b) to Louisville Gas and Electric Company Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-2893) dated June 1, 2017)


262




-Indenture, dated as of November 1, 2010, between LG&E and KU Energy LLC and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee (Exhibit 4(s)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated as of November 1, 2010, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(s)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 2, dated as of September 1, 2011, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(a) to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated September 30, 2011)
-2002 Series A Carroll County Loan Agreement, dated February 1, 2002, by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Carroll, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(w)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-Amendment No. 1 dated as of September 1, 2010 to said Loan Agreement by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Carroll, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(w)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-2002 Series B Carroll County Loan Agreement, dated February 1, 2002, by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Carroll, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(x)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-Amendment No. 1 dated as of September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Carroll, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(x)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-2004 Series A Carroll County Loan Agreement, dated October 1, 2004 and amended and restated as of September 1, 2008, by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Carroll, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(z)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-Amendment No. 1 dated as of September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Carroll, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(z)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-2006 Series B Carroll County Loan Agreement, dated October 1, 2006 and amended and restated September 1, 2008, by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Carroll, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(aa)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-Amendment No. 1 dated as of September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Carroll, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(aa)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-2007 Series A Carroll County Loan Agreement, dated March 1, 2007, by and between Kentucky Utilities Company and County of Carroll, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(bb)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-Amendment No. 1 dated September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Carroll, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(bb)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-2008 Series A Carroll County Loan Agreement, dated August 1, 2008 by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Carroll, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(cc)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)


263




-Amendment No. 1 dated September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Carroll, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(cc)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-2016 Series A Carroll County Loan Agreement dated as of August 1, 2016 between Kentucky Utilities Company and the County of Carroll, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(a) to Kentucky Utilities Company Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-3464) dated August 26, 2016)
-2000 Series A Mercer County Loan Agreement, dated May 1, 2000 and amended and restated as of September 1, 2008, by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Mercer, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(dd)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-Amendment No. 1 dated September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Mercer, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(dd)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-2002 Series A Mercer County Loan Agreement, dated February 1, 2002, by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Mercer, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(ee)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-Amendment No. 1 dated September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Mercer, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(ee)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-2002 Series A Muhlenberg County Loan Agreement, dated February 1, 2002, by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Muhlenberg, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(ff)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-Amendment No. 1 dated September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Muhlenberg, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(ff)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-2007 Series A Trimble County Loan Agreement, dated March 1, 2007, by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Trimble, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(gg)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-Amendment No. 1 dated September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Trimble, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(gg)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-2001 Series A Jefferson County Loan Agreement, dated November 1, 2001, by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company, and Jefferson County, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(jj)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-Amendment No. 1 dated September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company, and Jefferson County, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(jj)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-2001 Series B Jefferson County Loan Agreement, dated November 1, 2001, by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company, and Jefferson County, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(kk)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-Amendment No. 1 dated September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company, and Jefferson County, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(kk)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)


264




-2003 Series A Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government Loan Agreement, dated October 1, 2003, by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(ll)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-Amendment No. 1 dated September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company, and Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(ll)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-2005 Series A Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government Loan Agreement, dated February 1, 2005 and amended and restated as of September 1, 2008, by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company, and Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(mm)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-Amendment No. 1 dated September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company, and Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(mm)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-2007 Series A Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government Loan Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2007 and amended and restated as of September 1, 2008, by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company, and Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(nn)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-Amendment No. 1 dated September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company, and Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(nn)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-2007 Series B Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated November 1, 2010, by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(oo) to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-2001 Series A Trimble County Loan Agreement, dated November 1, 2001, by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company, and County of Trimble, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(qq)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-Amendment No. 1 dated September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company, and the County of Trimble, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(qq)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-2001 Series B Trimble County Loan Agreement, dated November 1, 2001, by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company, and County of Trimble, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(rr)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-Amendment No. 1 dated September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company, and County of Trimble, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(rr)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
-2016 Series A Trimble County Loan Agreement dated as of September 1, 2016 between Louisville Gas and Electric Company and the County of Trimble, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(a) to Louisville Gas and Electric Company Form 8-K (File No. 1-2893) dated September 15, 2016)


265




-Trust Deed, dated November 26, 2010, between Central Networks East plc and Central Networks West plc, the Issuers, and Deutsche Trustee Company Limited relating to Central Networks East plc and Central Network West plc £3 billion Euro Medium Term Note Programme (Exhibit 4(pp) to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2015)
-Indenture, dated April 21, 2011, between PPL WEM Holdings PLC, as Issuer, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee (Exhibit 10.2 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated April 21, 2011)
-Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated April 21, 2011, to said Indenture (Exhibit 10.3 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated April 21, 2011)
-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 30, 2014, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(a) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended September 30, 2014)
-Trust Deed, dated April 27, 2011, by and among Western Power Distribution (East Midlands) plc and Western Power Distribution (West Midlands) plc, as Issuers, and HSBC Corporate Trustee Company (UK) Limited as Note Trustee (Exhibit 4.1 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No.1-11459) dated May 17, 2011)
-Amended and Restated Trust Deed, dated September 10, 2013, by and among Western Power Distribution (East Midlands) plc, Western Power Distribution (West Midlands) plc, Western Power Distribution (South West) plc and Western Power Distribution (South Wales) plc as Issuers, and HSBC Corporate Trustee Company (UK) Limited as Note Trustee (Exhibit 4.1 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated October 18, 2013)
-£3,000,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme entered into by Western Power Distribution (East Midlands) plc, Western Power Distribution (South Wales) plc, Western Power Distribution (South West) plc and Western Power Distribution (West Midlands) plc, dated as of September 9, 2016 (Exhibit 4(oo)-3 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2016)
-£3,000,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme entered into by Western Power Distribution (East Midlands) plc, Western Power Distribution (South Wales) plc, Western Power Distribution (South West) plc and Western Power Distribution (West Midlands) plc, dated as of September 15, 2017 (Exhibit 4(b) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended September 30, 2017)
-Trust Deed constituting £500 million 3.625% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2023, dated November 6, 2015, by and among Western Power Distribution plc as Issuer, and HSBC Corporate Trustee Company (UK) Limited as Note Trustee (Exhibit 4.1 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated November 6, 2015)
-2017 Series A Trimble County Loan Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2017, by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company and the County of Trimble, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(a) to Louisville Gas and Electric Company Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-2893) dated June 1, 2017)
-Subscription Agreement, dated November 14, 2017, by and among Western Power Distribution(South West) plc as Issuer, HSBC Bank plc, Mizuho International plc, The Royal Bank of Scotland plc (trading as NatWest Markets), Banco Santander, S.A., Barclays Bank PLC, Lloyds Bank plc, Merrill Lynch International, MUFG Securities EMEA plc and RBC Europe Limited. (Exhibit 4.3 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated November 14, 2017).
-$75 million Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of October 30, 2013, among LG&E and KU Energy LLC, the Lenders from time to time party thereto, and PNC Bank, National Association, as the Administrative Agent and the Issuing Lender, PNC Capital Markets LLC, as Sole Lead Arranger and Sole Bookrunner, Fifth Third Bank, as Syndication Agent, and Central Bank & Trust Company, as Documentation Agent (Exhibit 10(ii) to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2013)


266




-$300 million Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of November 12, 2013, among PPL Capital Funding, Inc., as borrower, PPL Corporation, as Guarantor, the Lenders party thereof and PNC Bank National Association, as Administrative Agent, and Manufactures and Traders Trust as Syndication Agent (Exhibit 10.1 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated November 13, 2013)
-$150 million Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of March 26, 2014, among PPL Capital Funding, Inc., as Borrower, PPL Corporation, as Guarantor and The Bank of Nova Scotia, as Administrative Agent, Issuing Lender and Lender (Exhibit 10.1 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated April 1, 2014)
-First Amendment to said Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of March 17, 2015 (Exhibit 10(c)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-1459) for the year ended December 31, 2015)
-Second Amendment to said Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of March 17, 2016 (Exhibit 10(a) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-1459) for the quarter ended June 30, 2016)
-Third Amendment to said Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of March 17, 2017, (Exhibit 10(a) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-1459) for the quarter ended March 31, 2017)
-Employee Matters Agreement, among PPL Corporation, Talen Energy Corporation, C/R Energy Jade, LLC, Sapphire Power Holdings LLC. and Raven Power Holdings LLC, dated as of June 9, 2014 (Exhibit 10.1 to PPL Energy Supply, LLC Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-32944) dated June 12, 2014)
-$300 million Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2014, among PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, as the Borrower, the Lenders from time to time party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, Issuing Lender and Swingline Lender (Exhibit 10(e) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-905) for the quarter ended June 30, 2014)
-
Notice of Automatic Extension, dated as of September 29, 2014, to said Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (Exhibit 10(b) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-905) for the quarter ended September 30, 2014)
-Amendment No. 1 to said Credit Agreement, dated as of January 29, 2016 (Exhibit 10.2 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated February 3, 2016)
-Commitment Extension and Increase Agreement and Amendment No. 2 to said Credit Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2016 (Exhibit 10(e)-4 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-1459) for the year ended December 31, 2016)
-Commitment Extension Agreement and Amendment No. 3 to said Credit Agreement, dated as of January 26, 2018
-$300 million Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2014, among PPL Capital Funding, Inc., as the Borrower, PPL Corporation, as the Guarantor, the Lenders from time to time party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, Issuing Lender and Swingline Lender (Exhibit 10(d) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended June 30, 2014)
-Amendment No. 1 to said Credit Agreement, dated as of January 29, 2016 (Exhibit 10.1 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated February 3, 2016)


267




-Commitment Extension and Increase Agreement and Amendment No. 2 to said Credit Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2016 (Exhibit 10(f)-3 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-1459) for the year ended December 31, 2016)
-Commitment Extension Agreement and Amendment No. 3 to said Credit Agreement, dated as of January 26, 2018
-$400 million Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2014, among Kentucky Utilities Company, as the Borrower, the Lenders from time to time party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, Issuing Lender and Swingline Lender (Exhibit 10(f) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended June 30, 2014)
-Amendment No. 1 to said Credit Agreement, dated as of January 29, 2016 (Exhibit 10.4 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated February 3, 2016)
-Commitment Extension Agreement and Amendment No. 2 to said Credit Agreement, dated as of January 4, 2017 (Exhibit 10(g)-3 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-1459) for the year ended December 31, 2016)
-Commitment Extension Agreement and Amendment No. 3 to said Credit Agreement, dated as of January 26, 2018
-$500 million Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2014, among Louisville Gas and Electric Company, as the Borrower, the Lenders from time to time party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, Issuing Lender and Swingline Lender (Exhibit 10(g) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended June 30, 2014)
-Amendment No. 1 to said Credit Agreement, dated as of January 29, 2016 (Exhibit 10.3 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated February 3, 2016)
-Commitment Extension Agreement and Amendment No. 2 to said Credit Agreement, dated as of January 4, 2017 (Exhibit 10(h)-3 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-1459) for the year ended December 31, 2016)
-Commitment Extension Agreement and Amendment No. 3 to said Credit Agreement, dated as of January 26, 2018
-Amendment and Restatement Agreement, dated July 29, 2014, between Western Power Distribution (South West) plc and the banks party thereto, as Bookrunners and Mandated Lead Arrangers, HSBC Bank plc and Mizuho Bank, Ltd., as Joint Coordinators, and Mizuho Bank, Ltd., as Facility Agent, relating to the £245 million Multicurrency Revolving Credit Facility Agreement originally dated January 12, 2012 (Exhibit 10(h) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended June 30, 2014) 
-Amendment and Restatement Agreement, dated July 29, 2014, between Western Power Distribution (East Midlands) plc and the banks party thereto, as Bookrunners and Mandated Lead Arrangers, HSBC Bank plc and Mizuho Bank Ltd., as Joint Coordinators, and Bank of America Merrill Lynch International Limited, as Facility Agent, relating to the £300 million Multicurrency Revolving Credit Facility Agreement originally dated April 4, 2011(Exhibit 10(i) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended June 30, 2014)


268




-Amendment and Restatement Agreement, dated July 29, 2014, between Western Power Distribution (West Midlands) plc and the banks party thereto, as Bookrunners and Mandated Lead Arrangers, HSBC Bank plc and Mizuho Bank Ltd., as Joint Coordinators, and Bank of America Merrill Lynch International Limited, as Facility Agent, relating to the £300 million Multicurrency Revolving Credit Facility Agreement originally dated April 4, 2011(Exhibit 10(j) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended June 30, 2014)
-$198,309,583.05 Letter of Credit Agreement dated as of October 1, 2014 among Kentucky Utilities Company, as the Borrower, the Lenders from time to time party hereto and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch, as Administrative Agent (Exhibit 10.1 to Kentucky Utilities Company Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-3464) dated October 2, 2014)
-Amendment No. 1 to said Letter of Credit Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2017 (Exhibit 10(a) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-1459) for the quarter ended June 30, 2017)
-£210 million Multicurrency Revolving Credit Facility Agreement, dated January 13 2016, among Western Power Distribution plc and HSBC Bank PLC and Mizuho Bank, Ltd. as Joint Coordinators and Bookrunners, Mizuho Bank, Ltd. as Facility Agent and the other banks party thereto as Mandated Lead Arrangers (Exhibit 10.1 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated January 19, 2016)
-£100,000,000 Term Loan Agreement, dated May 24, 2016, between Western Power Distribution (East Midlands) plc and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. (Exhibit 10.1 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated May 26, 2016)
-£50,000,000 Facility Letter entered into between Western Power Distribution (South West) plc and Svenska Handelsbanken AB dated as of October 11, 2016 (Exhibit 10(a) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-1459) for the quarter ended September 30, 2016)
-£230,000,000 Term Loan Agreement, dated March 28, 2017, between Western Power Distribution plc and HSBC Bank, PLC and Mizuho Bank, Ltd., as Mandated Lead Arrangers, and Mizuho Bank, Ltd., as Facility Agent (Exhibit 10.1 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated April 5, 2017)
-£20,000,000 Uncommitted Facility Letter entered into between Western Power Distribution (South West) plc, Western Power Distribution (South Wales) plc, Western Power Distribution (West Midlands) plc, Western Power Distribution (East Midlands) plc and BNP Paribas, dated as of January 23, 2014 (Exhibit 10(a)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-1459) for the quarter ended September 30, 2017)
-Amendment to said Uncommitted Facility Letter, dated as of July 28, 2017 (Exhibit 10(a)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-1459) for the quarter ended September 30, 2017)
-$200,000,000 Term Loan Credit Agreement, dated as of October 26, 2017, among Louisville Gas and Electric Company, as the Borrower, the Lenders from time to time party hereto and U.S. Bank National Association, as Administrative Agent (Exhibit 10(b) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-1459) for the quarter ended September 30, 2017)
-Amended and Restated Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, dated June 12, 2000 (Exhibit 10(h) to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2000)
-Amendment No. 1 to said Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, dated December 18, 2002 (Exhibit 10(m)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2002)
-Amendment No. 2 to said Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, dated December 4, 2003 (Exhibit 10(q)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2003)


269




-Amendment No. 3 to said Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, dated as of January 1, 2005 (Exhibit 10(cc)-4 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2005)
-Amendment No. 4 to said Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, dated as of May 1, 2008 (Exhibit 10(x)-5 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2008)
-Amendment No. 5 to said Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, dated May 28, 2010 (Exhibit 10(a) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended June 30, 2010)
-Amendment No. 6 to said Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, dated as of April 15, 2015 (Exhibit 10(b) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended March 31, 2015)
-PPL Corporation Directors Deferred Compensation Plan Trust Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2001, between PPL Corporation and Wachovia Bank, N.A. (as successor to First Union National Bank), as Trustee (Exhibit 10(hh)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2012)
-PPL Officers Deferred Compensation Plan, PPL Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and PPL Supplemental Compensation Pension Plan Trust Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2001, between PPL Corporation and Wachovia Bank, N.A. (as successor to First Union National Bank), as Trustee (Exhibit 10(hh)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2012)
-PPL Revocable Employee Nonqualified Plans Trust Agreement, dated as of March 20, 2007, between PPL Corporation and Wachovia Bank, N.A., as Trustee (Exhibit 10(c) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-1149) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007)
-PPL Employee Change in Control Agreements Trust Agreement, dated as of March 20, 2007, between PPL Corporation and Wachovia Bank, N.A., as Trustee (Exhibit 10(d) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007)
-PPL Revocable Director Nonqualified Plans Trust Agreement, dated as of March 20, 2007, between PPL Corporation and Wachovia Bank, N.A., as Trustee (Exhibit 10(e) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007)
-Amended and Restated Officers Deferred Compensation Plan, dated December 8, 2003 (Exhibit 10(r) to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2003)
-Amendment No. 1 to said Officers Deferred Compensation Plan, dated as of January 1, 2005 (Exhibit 10(ee)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2005)
-Amendment No. 2 to said Officers Deferred Compensation Plan, dated as of January 22, 2007 (Exhibit 10(bb)-3 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2006)
-Amendment No. 3 to said Officers Deferred Compensation Plan, dated as of June 1, 2008 (Exhibit 10(z)-4 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2008)
-Amendment No. 4 to said Officers Deferred Compensation Plan, dated as of February 15, 2012 (Exhibit 10(ff)-5 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2011)


270




-Amendment No. 5 to said Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, dated as of May 8, 2014 (Exhibit 10(a) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended June 30, 2014)
-Amendment No. 6 to said Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, dated as of December 16, 2015 (Exhibit [_]10(q)-7 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-1459) for the year ended December 31, 2015)
-Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated December 8, 2003 (Exhibit 10(s) to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2003)
-Amendment No. 1 to said Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated December 16, 2004 (Exhibit 99.1 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated December 17, 2004)
-Amendment No. 2 to said Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated as of January 1, 2005 (Exhibit 10(ff)-3 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2005)
-Amendment No. 3 to said Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated as of January 22, 2007 (Exhibit 10(cc)-4 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2006)
-Amendment No. 4 to said Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated as of December 9, 2008 (Exhibit 10(aa)-5 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2008)
-Amendment No. 5 to said Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated as of February 15, 2012 (Exhibit 10(gg)-6 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2011)
-Amended and Restated Incentive Compensation Plan, effective January 1, 2003 (Exhibit 10(p) to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2002)
-Amendment No. 1 to said Incentive Compensation Plan, dated as of January 1, 2005 (Exhibit 10(gg)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2005)
-Amendment No. 2 to said Incentive Compensation Plan, dated as of January 26, 2007 (Exhibit 10(dd)-3 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2006)
-Amendment No. 3 to said Incentive Compensation Plan, dated as of March 21, 2007 (Exhibit 10(f) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007)
-Amendment No. 4 to said Incentive Compensation Plan, effective December 1, 2007 (Exhibit 10(a) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008)
-Amendment No. 5 to said Incentive Compensation Plan, dated as of December 16, 2008 (Exhibit 10(bb)-6 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2008)
-Form of Stock Option Agreement for stock option awards under the Incentive Compensation Plan (Exhibit 10(a) to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated February 1, 2006)
-Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for restricted stock unit awards under the Incentive Compensation Plan (Exhibit 10(b) to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated February 1, 2006)


271




-Form of Performance Unit Agreement for performance unit awards under the Incentive Compensation Plan (Exhibit 10(ss) to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2007)
-Amended and Restated Incentive Compensation Plan for Key Employees, effective January 1, 2003 (Schedule B to Proxy Statement of PPL Corporation, dated March 17, 2003)
-Amendment No. 1 to said Incentive Compensation Plan for Key Employees, dated as of January 1, 2005 (Exhibit (hh)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2005)
-Amendment No. 2 to said Incentive Compensation Plan for Key Employees, dated as of January 26, 2007 (Exhibit 10(ee)-3 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2006)
-Amendment No. 3 to said Incentive Compensation Plan for Key Employees, dated as of March 21, 2007 (Exhibit 10(g) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007)
-Amendment No. 4 to said Incentive Compensation Plan for Key Employees, dated as of December 15, 2008 (Exhibit 10(cc)-5 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2008)
-Amendment No. 5 to said Incentive Compensation Plan for Key Employees, dated as of March 24, 2011 (Exhibit 10(a) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011)
-Short-term Incentive Plan (Annex B to Proxy Statement of PPL Corporation, dated April 12, 2016)
-Employment letter, dated May 31, 2006, between PPL Services Corporation and William H. Spence (Exhibit 10(pp) to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2006)
-Form of Retention Agreement entered into between PPL Corporation and Gregory N. Dudkin (Exhibit 10(h) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007)
-Form of Severance Agreement entered into between PPL Corporation and William H. Spence (Exhibit 10(i) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007)
-Amendment to said Severance Agreement (Exhibit 10(a) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009)
-Form of Change in Control Severance Protection Agreement entered into between PPL Corporation and Gregory N. Dudkin, Joanne H. Raphael, Vincent Sorgi and Victor A. Staffieri (Exhibit 10(b) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended March 31, 2012)
-PPL Corporation Amended and Restated 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (Annex B to Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on April 5, 2017)
-Form of Performance Unit Agreement for performance unit awards under the Stock Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10(tt)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2012)


272




-Form of Performance Contingent Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for restricted stock unit awards under the Stock Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10(tt)-3 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2012)
-Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for stock option awards under the Stock Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10(tt)-4 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2012)
-Form of Total Shareholder Return Performance Unit Agreement for performance units under the Amended and Restated 2012 Stock Incentive Plan
-Form of Return on Equity Performance Unit Agreement for performance units under the Amended and Restated 2012 Stock Incentive Plan
-PPL Corporation Executive Severance Plan, effective as of July 26, 2012 (Exhibit 10(d) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended June 30, 2012)
-Form of Western Power Distribution Phantom Stock Option Award Agreement for stock option awards under the Western Power Distribution Long-Term Incentive Plan (Exhibit [_]10(bbb)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2014)
-Service Agreement (including Change in Control Agreement as Exhibit A), dated March 16, 2015, between Western Power Distribution (South West) plc and Robert A. Symons (Exhibit 10(a) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended March 31, 2015)
-Form of Grant Letter dated May 29, 2015 (Exhibit 10.1 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated June 1, 2015)
-PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
-PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
-LG&E and KU Energy LLC and Subsidiaries Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
-Louisville Gas and Electric Company Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
-Kentucky Utilities Company Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
-Subsidiaries of PPL Corporation
-Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP - PPL Corporation
-
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP - PPL Electric Utilities Corporation

-
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP - LG&E and KU Energy LLC



273




-
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP - Louisville Gas and Electric Company

-Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP - Kentucky Utilities Company
-Consent of Ernst & Young LLP - PPL Corporation
-
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP - PPL Electric Utilities Corporation

-
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP - LG&E and KU Energy LLC

-
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP - Louisville Gas and Electric Company

-Consent of Ernst & Young LLP - Kentucky Utilities Company
-Power of Attorney
-Certificate of PPL's principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
-Certificate of PPL's principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
-Certificate of PPL Electric's principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
-Certificate of PPL Electric's principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
-Certificate of LKE's principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
-Certificate of LKE's principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
-Certificate of LG&E's principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
-Certificate of LG&E's principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
-Certificate of KU's principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


274




-Certificate of KU's principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
-Certificate of PPL's principal executive officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
-Certificate of PPL Electric's principal executive officer and principal financial officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
-Certificate of LKE's principal executive officer and principal financial officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
-Certificate of LG&E's principal executive officer and principal financial officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
-Certificate of KU's principal executive officer and principal financial officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
-PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries Long-term Debt Schedule
101.INS-XBRL Instance Document for PPL Corporation, PPL Energy Supply, LLC, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company
101.SCH-XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema for PPL Corporation, PPL Corporation, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company
101.CAL-XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase for PPL Corporation, PPL Corporation, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company
101.DEF-XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase for PPL Corporation, PPL Corporation, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company
101.LAB-XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase for PPL Corporation, PPL Corporation, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company
101.PRE-XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase for PPL Corporation, PPL Corporation, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company






275




SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
PPL Corporation
(Registrant) 
By /s/ William H. Spence    
William H. Spence -    
Chairman, President and    
Chief Executive Officer    
     
     
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
     
     
/s/ William H. Spence    
William H. Spence -    
Chairman, President and    
Chief Executive Officer    
(Principal Executive Officer)    
     
     
/s/ Vincent Sorgi    
Vincent Sorgi -    
Senior Vice President and    
Chief Financial Officer    
(Principal Financial Officer)    
     
     
/s/ Stephen K. Breininger    
Stephen K. Breininger -    
Vice President and Controller    
(Principal Accounting Officer)    
     
     
Directors:    
     
Rodney C. Adkins William H. Spence  
John W. Conway Natica von Althann  
Steven G. Elliott Keith H. Williamson  
Venkata Rajamannar Madabhushi Armando Zagalo de LimaPhoebe A. Wood  
Craig A. Rogerson Armando Zagalo de Lima  
     
     
 
 
    
/s/ William H. Spence    
William H. Spence, Attorney-in-fact Date:  February 17, 201722, 2018  



276




SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation
(Registrant) 
By /s/ Gregory N. Dudkin    
Gregory N. Dudkin -    
President    
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
     
     
     
/s/ Gregory N. Dudkin    
Gregory N. Dudkin -    
President    
(Principal Executive Officer)    
     
/s/ Marlene C. Beers    
Marlene C. Beers -    
Controller
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
    
     
     
Directors:    
     
/s/ Gregory N. Dudkin /s/ Vincent Sorgi  
Gregory N. Dudkin Vincent Sorgi  
     
/s/ Joanne H. Raphael /s/ William H. Spence  
Joanne H. Raphael William H. Spence  
     
     
Date:  February 17, 201722, 2018    



277





SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
LG&E and KU Energy LLC
(Registrant)
By /s/ Victor A. Staffieri    
Victor A. Staffieri -    
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
 
    
     
     
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
     
     
     
/s/ Victor A. Staffieri    
Victor A. Staffieri -    
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer    
(Principal Executive Officer)    
     
     
/s/ Kent W. Blake    
Kent W. Blake -    
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
    
     
     
     
Directors:    
     
/s/ Kent W. Blake /s/ Victor A. Staffieri  
Kent W. Blake Victor A. Staffieri  
 
/s/ Vincent Sorgi
 
 
/s/ Paul W. Thompson
  
Vincent Sorgi Paul W. Thompson  
 
/s/ William H. Spence
    
William H. Spence    
     
     
Date:  February 17, 201722, 2018    



278





SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
Louisville Gas and Electric Company
(Registrant)
 
By /s/ Victor A. Staffieri    
Victor A. Staffieri -    
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer    
     
     
     
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
     
     
     
/s/ Victor A. Staffieri    
Victor A. Staffieri -    
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
    
     
     
     
/s/ Kent W. Blake    
Kent W. Blake -    
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
    
     
     
     
Directors:    
     
/s/ Kent W. Blake /s/ Victor A. Staffieri  
Kent W. Blake Victor A. Staffieri  
 
/s/ Vincent Sorgi
 
 
/s/ Paul W. Thompson
  
Vincent Sorgi Paul W. Thompson  
     
/s/ William H. Spence    
William H. Spence    
     
Date:  February 17, 201722, 2018    



279





SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
Kentucky Utilities Company
(Registrant)
 
By /s/ Victor A. Staffieri    
Victor A. Staffieri -    
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer    
     
     
     
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
     
     
     
/s/ Victor A. Staffieri    
Victor A. Staffieri -    
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
    
     
     
     
/s/ Kent W. Blake    
Kent W. Blake -    
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
    
     
     
     
Directors:    
     
/s/ Kent W. Blake /s/ Victor A. Staffieri  
Kent W. Blake Victor A. Staffieri  
 
/s/ Vincent Sorgi
 
 
/s/ Paul W. Thompson
  
Vincent Sorgi Paul W. Thompson  
     
/s/ William H. Spence    
William H. Spence    
     
Date:  February 17, 201722, 2018    



EXHIBIT INDEX
The following Exhibits indicated by an asterisk preceding the Exhibit number are filed herewith. The balance of the Exhibits has heretofore been filed with the Commission and pursuant to Rule 12(b)-32 are incorporated herein by reference. Exhibits indicated by a [_] are filed or listed pursuant to Item 601(b)(10)(iii) of Regulation S-K.
1(a)-Securities Purchase and Registration Rights Agreement, dated March 5, 2014, among PPL Capital Funding, Inc., PPL Corporation, and the several purchasers named in Schedule B thereto (Exhibit 1.1 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated March 10, 2014)
1(b)-Equity Distribution Agreement, dated February 26, 2015, by and among PPL Corporation and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporation (Exhibit 1.1 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated February 26, 2015)
1(c)-Equity Distribution Agreement, dated February 26, 2015, by and among PPL Corporation and Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC (Exhibit 1.2 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated February 26, 2015)
2(a)-Separation Agreement among PPL Corporation, Talen Energy Holdings, Inc., Talen Energy Corporation, PPL Energy Supply, LLC, Raven Power Holdings LLC, C/R Energy Jade, LLC and Sapphire Power Holdings LLC., dated as of June 9, 2014 (Exhibit 2.1 to PPL Energy Supply, LLC Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-32944) dated June 12, 2014)
2(b)-Transaction Agreement among PPL Corporation, Talen Energy Holdings, Inc., Talen Energy Corporation, PPL Energy Supply, LLC, Talen Energy Merger Sub, Inc., C/R Energy Jade, LLC, Sapphire Power Holdings LLC. and Raven Power Holdings LLC, dated as of June 9, 2014 (Exhibit 2.2 to PPL Energy Supply, LLC Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-32944) dated June 12, 2014)
3(a)-Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of PPL Corporation, effective as of May 25, 2016 (Exhibit 3(i) to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated May 26, 2016)
3(b)-Bylaws of PPL Corporation, effective as of December 18, 2015 (Exhibit 3(ii) to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated December 21, 2015)
3(c)-Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, effective as of October 31, 2013 (Exhibit 3(a) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-905) for the quarter ended September 30, 2013)
3(d)-Bylaws of PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, effective as of October 27, 2015 (Exhibit 3(a) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended September 30, 2015)
3(e)-Articles of Organization of LG&E and KU Energy LLC, effective as of December 29, 2003 (Exhibit 3(a) to Registration Statement filed on Form S-4 (File No. 333-173665))
3(f)-1-Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of LG&E and KU Energy LLC, effective as of November  1, 2010 (Exhibit 3(b) to Registration Statement filed on Form S-4 (File No. 333-173665))
3(f)-2-Amendment to Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of LG&E and KU Energy LLC, effective as of November 25, 2013 (Exhibit 3(h)-2) to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2013)
3(g)-1-Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Louisville Gas and Electric Company, effective as of November 6, 1996 (Exhibit 3(a) to Registration Statement filed on Form S-4 (File No. 333-173676))
3(g)-2-Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of Louisville Gas and Electric Company, effective as of April 6, 2004 (Exhibit 3(b) to Registration Statement filed on Form S-4 (File No. 333-173676))

3(h)-Bylaws of Louisville Gas and Electric Company, effective as of December 16, 2003 (Exhibit 3(c) to Registration Statement filed on Form S-4 (File No. 333-173676))
3(i)-1-Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Kentucky Utilities Company, effective as of December 14, 1993 (Exhibit 3(a) to Registration Statement filed on Form S-4 (File No. 333-173675))
3(i)-2-Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of Kentucky Utilities Company, effective as of April 8, 2004 (Exhibit 3(b) to Registration Statement filed on Form S-4 (File No. 333-173675))
3(j)-Bylaws of Kentucky Utilities Company, effective as of December 16, 2003 (Exhibit 3(c) to Registration Statement filed on Form S-4 (File No. 333-173675))
-Amended and Restated Employee Stock Ownership Plan, dated December 1, 2016
4(b)-Trust Deed constituting £150 million 9.25% percent Bonds due 2020, dated November 9, 1995, between South Wales Electric plc and Bankers Trustee Company Limited (Exhibit 4(k) to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2004)
4(c)-1-Indenture, dated as of November 1, 1997, among PPL Corporation, PPL Capital Funding, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank (formerly The Chase Manhattan Bank), as Trustee (Exhibit 4.1 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated November 12, 1997)
4(c)-2-Supplemental Indenture No. 8, dated as of June 14, 2012, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(b) to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated June 14, 2012)
4(c)-3-Supplemental Indenture No. 9, dated as of October 15, 2012, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(b) to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated October 15, 2012)
4(c)-4-Supplemental Indenture No. 10, dated as of May 24, 2013, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4.2 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated May 24, 2013)
4(c)-5-Supplemental Indenture No. 11, dated as of May 24, 2013, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4.3 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated May 24, 2013)
4(c)-6-Supplemental Indenture No. 12, dated as of May 24, 2013, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4.4 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated May 24, 2013)
4(c)-7-Supplemental Indenture No. 13, dated as of March 10, 2014, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4.2 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated March 10, 2014)
4(c)-8-Supplemental Indenture No. 14, dated as of March 10, 2014, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4.3 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated March 10, 2014)
4(c)-9-Supplemental Indenture No. 15, dated as of May 17, 2016, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(b) to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated May 17, 2016)
4(d)-1-Indenture, dated as of March 16, 2001, among WPD Holdings UK, Bankers Trust Company, as Trustee, Principal Paying Agent, and Transfer Agent and Deutsche Bank Luxembourg, S.A., as Paying and Transfer Agent (Exhibit 4(g) to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2009)


4(d)-2-First Supplemental Indenture constituting the creation of $200 million 6.75% Notes due 2004, $200 million 6.875% Notes due 2007, $225 million 6.50% Notes due 2008, $100 million 7.25% Notes due 2017 and $300 million 7.375% Notes due 2028, dated as of March 16, 2001, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(n)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2004)
4(d)-3-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 30, 2003, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(n)-3 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2004)
4(d)-4-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 31, 2014, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(b) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended September 30, 2014)
-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 1, 2016
4(e)-1-Indenture, dated as of August 1, 2001, by PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and JPMorgan Chase Bank (formerly The Chase Manhattan Bank), as Trustee (Exhibit 4.1 to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-905) dated August 21, 2001)
4(e)-2-Supplemental Indenture No. 6, dated as of December 1, 2005, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(a) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-905) dated December 22, 2005)
4(e)-3-Supplemental Indenture No. 7, dated as of August 1, 2007, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(b) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-905) dated August 14, 2007)
4(e)-4-Supplemental Indenture No. 9, dated as of October 1, 2008, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(c) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-905) dated October 31, 2008)
4(e)-5-Supplemental Indenture No. 10, dated as of May 1, 2009, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(b) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-905) dated May 22, 2009)
4(e)-6-Supplemental Indenture No. 11, dated as of July 1, 2011, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4.1 to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-905) dated July 13, 2011)
4(e)-7-Supplemental Indenture No. 12, dated as of July 1, 2011, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(a) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-905) dated July 18, 2011)
4(e)-8-Supplemental Indenture No. 13, dated as of August 1, 2011, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(a) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-905) dated August 23, 2011)
4(e)-9-Supplemental Indenture No. 14, dated as of August 1, 2012, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(a) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-905) dated August 24, 2012)
4(e)-10-Supplemental Indenture No. 15, dated as of July 1, 2013, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(a) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-905) dated July 11, 2013)
4(e)-11-Supplemental Indenture No. 16, dated as of June 1, 2014, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(a) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-905) dated June 5, 2014)
4(e)-12-Supplemental Indenture No. 17, dated as of October 1, 2015, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(c) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-905) dated October 1, 2015)
4(e)-13-Supplemental Indenture No. 18, dated as of March 1, 2016, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(c) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-905) dated March 10, 2016)


4(f)-1-Trust Deed constituting £200 million 5.875 percent Bonds due 2027, dated March 25, 2003, between Western Power Distribution (South West) plc and J.P. Morgan Corporate Trustee Services Limited (Exhibit 4(o)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2004)
4(f)-2-Supplement, dated May 27, 2003, to said Trust Deed, constituting £50 million 5.875 percent Bonds due 2027 (Exhibit 4(o)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2004)
4(g)-1-
Pollution Control Facilities Loan Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2008, between Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority and PPL Electric Utilities Corporation (Exhibit 4(a) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-905) dated October 31, 2008)

4(g)-2-Pollution Control Facilities Loan Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2016, between PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and the Lehigh County Industrial Development Authority (Exhibit 4(a) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-905) dated March 10, 2016)
4(g)-3-Pollution Control Facilities Loan Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2016, between PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and the Lehigh County Industrial Development Authority (Exhibit 4(b) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-905) dated March 10, 2016)
4(h)-Trust Deed constituting £105 million 1.541 percent Index-Linked Notes due 2053, dated December 1, 2006, between Western Power Distribution (South West) plc and HSBC Trustee (CI) Limited (Exhibit 4(i) to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2006)
4(i)-Trust Deed constituting £120 million 1.541 percent Index-Linked Notes due 2056, dated December 1, 2006, between Western Power Distribution (South West) plc and HSBC Trustee (CI) Limited (Exhibit 4(j) to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2006)
4(j)-Trust Deed constituting £225 million 4.80436 percent Notes due 2037, dated December 21, 2006, between Western Power Distribution (South Wales) plc and HSBC Trustee (CI) Limited (Exhibit 4(k) to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2006)
4(k)-1-Subordinated Indenture, dated as of March 1, 2007, between PPL Capital Funding, Inc., PPL Corporation and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (Exhibit 4(a) to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated March 20, 2007)
4(k)-2-Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated as of March 1, 2007, to said Subordinated Indenture (Exhibit 4(b) to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated March 20, 2007)
4(k)-3-Supplemental Indenture No. 4, dated as of March 15, 2013, to said Subordinated Indenture (Exhibit 4(b) to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated March 15, 2013)
4(l)-Trust Deed constituting £200 million 5.75 percent Notes due 2040, dated March 23, 2010, between Western Power Distribution (South Wales) plc and HSBC Corporate Trustee Company (UK) Limited (Exhibit 4(a) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended March 31, 2010)
4(m)-Trust Deed constituting £200 million 5.75 percent Notes due 2040, dated March 23, 2010, between Western Power Distribution (South West) plc and HSBC Corporate Trustee Company (UK) Limited (Exhibit 4(b) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended March 31, 2010)


4(n)-1-Indenture, dated as of October 1, 2010, between Kentucky Utilities Company and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee (Exhibit 4(q)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(n)-2-Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated as of October 15, 2010, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(q)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(n)-3-Supplemental Indenture No. 2, dated as of November 1, 2010, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(q)-3 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(n)-4-Supplemental Indenture No. 3, dated as of November 1, 2013, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(b) to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated November 13, 2013)
4(n)-5-Supplemental Indenture No. 4, dated as of September 1, 2015, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(b) to Kentucky Utilities Company Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-3464) dated September 28, 2015)
4(n)-6-Supplemental Indenture No. 5, dated as of August 1, 2016, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(b) to Kentucky Utilities Company Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-3464) dated August 26, 2016)
4(o)-1-Indenture, dated as of October 1, 2010, between Louisville Gas and Electric Company and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee (Exhibit 4(r)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(o)-2-Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated as of October 15, 2010, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(r)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(o)-3-Supplemental Indenture No. 2, dated as of November 1, 2010, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(r)-3 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(o)-4-Supplemental Indenture No. 3, dated as of November 1, 2013, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(a) to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated November 13, 2013)
4(o)-5-Supplemental Indenture No. 4, dated as of September 1, 2015, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(a) to Louisville Gas and Electric Company Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-2893) dated September 28, 2015)
4(o)-6-Supplemental Indenture No. 5, dated as of September 1, 2016, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(b) to Louisville Gas and Electric Company Form 8-K (File No. 1-2893) dated September 15, 2016)
4(p)-1-Indenture, dated as of November 1, 2010, between LG&E and KU Energy LLC and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee (Exhibit 4(s)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(p)-2-Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated as of November 1, 2010, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(s)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(p)-3-Supplemental Indenture No. 2, dated as of September 1, 2011, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(a) to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated September 30, 2011)
4(q)-1-2002 Series A Carroll County Loan Agreement, dated February 1, 2002, by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Carroll, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(w)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)


4(q)-2-Amendment No. 1 dated as of September 1, 2010 to said Loan Agreement by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Carroll, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(w)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(r)-1-2002 Series B Carroll County Loan Agreement, dated February 1, 2002, by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Carroll, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(x)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(r)-2-Amendment No. 1 dated as of September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Carroll, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(x)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(s)-1-2004 Series A Carroll County Loan Agreement, dated October 1, 2004 and amended and restated as of September 1, 2008, by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Carroll, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(z)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(s)-2-Amendment No. 1 dated as of September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Carroll, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(z)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(t)-1-2006 Series B Carroll County Loan Agreement, dated October 1, 2006 and amended and restated September 1, 2008, by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Carroll, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(aa)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(t)-2-Amendment No. 1 dated as of September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Carroll, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(aa)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(u)-1-2007 Series A Carroll County Loan Agreement, dated March 1, 2007, by and between Kentucky Utilities Company and County of Carroll, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(bb)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(u)-2-Amendment No. 1 dated September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Carroll, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(bb)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(v)-1-2008 Series A Carroll County Loan Agreement, dated August 1, 2008 by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Carroll, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(cc)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(v)-2-Amendment No. 1 dated September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Carroll, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(cc)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(w)-2016 Series A Carroll County Loan Agreement dated as of August 1, 2016 between Kentucky Utilities Company and the County of Carroll, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(a) to Kentucky Utilities Company Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-3464) dated August 26, 2016)
4(x)-1-2000 Series A Mercer County Loan Agreement, dated May 1, 2000 and amended and restated as of September 1, 2008, by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Mercer, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(dd)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)


4(x)-2-Amendment No. 1 dated September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Mercer, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(dd)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(y)-1-2002 Series A Mercer County Loan Agreement, dated February 1, 2002, by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Mercer, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(ee)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(y)-2-Amendment No. 1 dated September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Mercer, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(ee)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(z)-1-2002 Series A Muhlenberg County Loan Agreement, dated February 1, 2002, by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Muhlenberg, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(ff)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(z)-2-Amendment No. 1 dated September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Muhlenberg, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(ff)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(aa)-1-2007 Series A Trimble County Loan Agreement, dated March 1, 2007, by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Trimble, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(gg)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(aa)-2-Amendment No. 1 dated September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Kentucky Utilities Company, and County of Trimble, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(gg)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(bb)-1-2001 Series A Jefferson County Loan Agreement, dated July 1, 2001, by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company, and Jefferson County, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(ii)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(bb)-2-Amendment No. 1 dated September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company, and Jefferson County, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(ii)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(cc)-1-2001 Series A Jefferson County Loan Agreement, dated November 1, 2001, by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company, and Jefferson County, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(jj)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(cc)-2-Amendment No. 1 dated September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company, and Jefferson County, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(jj)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(dd)-1-2001 Series B Jefferson County Loan Agreement, dated November 1, 2001, by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company, and Jefferson County, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(kk)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(dd)-2-Amendment No. 1 dated September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company, and Jefferson County, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(kk)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(ee)-1-2003 Series A Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government Loan Agreement, dated October 1, 2003, by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(ll)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)


4(ee)-2-Amendment No. 1 dated September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company, and Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(ll)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(ff)-1-2005 Series A Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government Loan Agreement, dated February 1, 2005 and amended and restated as of September 1, 2008, by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company, and Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(mm)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(ff)-2-Amendment No. 1 dated September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company, and Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(mm)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(gg)-1-2007 Series A Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government Loan Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2007 and amended and restated as of September 1, 2008, by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company, and Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(nn)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(gg)-2-Amendment No. 1 dated September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company, and Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(nn)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(hh)-2007 Series B Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated November 1, 2010, by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(oo) to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(ii)-1-2001 Series A Trimble County Loan Agreement, dated November 1, 2001, by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company, and County of Trimble, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(qq)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(ii)-2-Amendment No. 1 dated September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company, and the County of Trimble, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(qq)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(jj)-1-2001 Series B Trimble County Loan Agreement, dated November 1, 2001, by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company, and County of Trimble, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(rr)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(jj)-2-Amendment No. 1 dated September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company, and County of Trimble, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(rr)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(kk)-1-2007 Series A Trimble County Loan Agreement, dated March 1, 2007, by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company, and County of Trimble, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(tt)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(kk)-2-Amendment No. 1 dated September 1, 2010, to said Loan Agreement by and between Louisville Gas and Electric Company, and County of Trimble, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(tt)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2010)
4(ll)-2016 Series A Trimble County Loan Agreement dated as of September 1, 2016 between Louisville Gas and Electric Company and the County of Trimble, Kentucky (Exhibit 4(a) to Louisville Gas and Electric Company Form 8-K (File No. 1-2893) dated September 15, 2016)201


4(mm)-Trust Deed, dated November 26, 2010, between Central Networks East plc and Central Networks West plc, the Issuers, and Deutsche Trustee Company Limited relating to Central Networks East plc and Central Network West plc £3 billion Euro Medium Term Note Programme (Exhibit 4(pp) to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2015)
4(nn)-1-Indenture, dated April 21, 2011, between PPL WEM Holdings PLC, as Issuer, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee (Exhibit 10.2 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated April 21, 2011)
4(nn)-2-Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated April 21, 2011, to said Indenture (Exhibit 10.3 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated April 21, 2011)
4(nn)-3-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 30, 2014, to said Indenture (Exhibit 4(a) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended September 30, 2014)
4(oo)-1-Trust Deed, dated April 27, 2011, by and among Western Power Distribution (East Midlands) plc and Western Power Distribution (West Midlands) plc, as Issuers, and HSBC Corporate Trustee Company (UK) Limited as Note Trustee (Exhibit 4.1 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No.1-11459) dated May 17, 2011)
4(oo)-2-Amended and Restated Trust Deed, dated September 10, 2013, by and among Western Power Distribution (East Midlands) plc, Western Power Distribution (West Midlands) plc, Western Power Distribution (South West) plc and Western Power Distribution (South Wales) plc as Issuers, and HSBC Corporate Trustee Company (UK) Limited as Note Trustee (Exhibit 4.1 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated October 18, 2013)
-£3,000,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme entered into by Western Power Distribution (East Midlands) plc, Western Power Distribution (South Wales) plc, Western Power Distribution (South West) plc and Western Power Distribution (West Midlands) plc, dated as of September 9, 2016
4(pp)-Trust Deed constituting £500 million 3.625% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2023, dated November 6, 2015, by and among Western Power Distribution plc as Issuer, and HSBC Corporate Trustee Company (UK) Limited as Note Trustee (Exhibit 4.1 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated November 6, 2015)
10(a)-$75 million Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of October 30, 2013, among LG&E and KU Energy LLC, the Lenders from time to time party thereto, and PNC Bank, National Association, as the Administrative Agent and the Issuing Lender, PNC Capital Markets LLC, as Sole Lead Arranger and Sole Bookrunner, Fifth Third Bank, as Syndication Agent, and Central Bank & Trust Company, as Documentation Agent (Exhibit 10(ii) to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2013)
10(b)-$300 million Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of November 12, 2013, among PPL Capital Funding, Inc., as borrower, PPL Corporation, as Guarantor, the Lenders party thereof and PNC Bank National Association, as Administrative Agent, and Manufactures and Traders Trust as Syndication Agent (Exhibit 10.1 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated November 13, 2013)
10(c)-1-$150 million Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of March 26, 2014, among PPL Capital Funding, Inc., as Borrower, PPL Corporation, as Guarantor and The Bank of Nova Scotia, as Administrative Agent, Issuing Lender and Lender (Exhibit 10.1 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated April 1, 2014)
10(c)-2-First Amendment to said Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of March 17, 2015 (Exhibit 10(c)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-1459) for the year ended December 31, 2015)


10(c)-3-Second Amendment to said Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of March 17, 2016 (Exhibit 10(a) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-1459) for the quarter ended June 30, 2016)
10(d)-Employee Matters Agreement, among PPL Corporation, Talen Energy Corporation, C/R Energy Jade, LLC, Sapphire Power Holdings LLC. and Raven Power Holdings LLC, dated as of June 9, 2014 (Exhibit 10.1 to PPL Energy Supply, LLC Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-32944) dated June 12, 2014)
10(e)-1-$300 million Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2014, among PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, as the Borrower, the Lenders from time to time party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, Issuing Lender and Swingline Lender (Exhibit 10(e) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-905) for the quarter ended June 30, 2014)
10(e)-2-
Notice of Automatic Extension, dated as of September 29, 2014, to said Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (Exhibit 10(b) to PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-905) for the quarter ended September 30, 2014)
10(e)-3-Amendment No. 1 to said Credit Agreement, dated as of January 29, 2016 (Exhibit 10.2 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated February 3, 2016)
-Commitment Extension and Increase Agreement and Amendment No. 2 to said Credit Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2016
10(f)-1-$300 million Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2014, among PPL Capital Funding, Inc., as the Borrower, PPL Corporation, as the Guarantor, the Lenders from time to time party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, Issuing Lender and Swingline Lender (Exhibit 10(d) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended June 30, 2014)
10(f)-2-Amendment No. 1 to said Credit Agreement, dated as of January 29, 2016 (Exhibit 10.1 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated February 3, 2016)
-Commitment Extension and Increase Agreement and Amendment No. 2 to said Credit Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2016
10(g)-1-$400 million Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2014, among Kentucky Utilities Company, as the Borrower, the Lenders from time to time party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, Issuing Lender and Swingline Lender (Exhibit 10(f) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended June 30, 2014)
10(g)-2-Amendment No. 1 to said Credit Agreement, dated as of January 29, 2016 (Exhibit 10.4 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated February 3, 2016)
-Commitment Extension Agreement and Amendment No. 2 to said Credit Agreement, dated as of January 4, 2017
10(h)-1-$500 million Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2014, among Louisville Gas and Electric Company, as the Borrower, the Lenders from time to time party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, Issuing Lender and Swingline Lender (Exhibit 10(g) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended June 30, 2014)
10(h)-2-Amendment No. 1 to said Credit Agreement, dated as of January 29, 2016 (Exhibit 10.3 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated February 3, 2016)


-Commitment Extension Agreement and Amendment No. 2 to said Credit Agreement, dated as of January 4, 2017
10(i)-Amendment and Restatement Agreement, dated July 29, 2014, between Western Power Distribution (South West) plc and the banks party thereto, as Bookrunners and Mandated Lead Arrangers, HSBC Bank plc and Mizuho Bank, Ltd., as Joint Coordinators, and Mizuho Bank, Ltd., as Facility Agent, relating to the £245 million Multicurrency Revolving Credit Facility Agreement originally dated January 12, 2012 (Exhibit 10(h) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended June 30, 2014) 
10(j)-Amendment and Restatement Agreement, dated July 29, 2014, between Western Power Distribution (East Midlands) plc and the banks party thereto, as Bookrunners and Mandated Lead Arrangers, HSBC Bank plc and Mizuho Bank Ltd., as Joint Coordinators, and Bank of America Merrill Lynch International Limited, as Facility Agent, relating to the £300 million Multicurrency Revolving Credit Facility Agreement originally dated April 4, 2011(Exhibit 10(i) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended June 30, 2014)
10(k)-Amendment and Restatement Agreement, dated July 29, 2014, between Western Power Distribution (West Midlands) plc and the banks party thereto, as Bookrunners and Mandated Lead Arrangers, HSBC Bank plc and Mizuho Bank Ltd., as Joint Coordinators, and Bank of America Merrill Lynch International Limited, as Facility Agent, relating to the £300 million Multicurrency Revolving Credit Facility Agreement originally dated April 4, 2011(Exhibit 10(j) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended June 30, 2014)
10(l)-$198,309,583.05 Letter of Credit Agreement dated as of October 1, 2014 among Kentucky Utilities Company, as the Borrower, the Lenders from time to time party hereto and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch, as Administrative Agent (Exhibit 10.1 to Kentucky Utilities Company Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-3464) dated October 2, 2014)
10(m)-£210 million Multicurrency Revolving Credit Facility Agreement, dated January 13 2016, among Western Power Distribution plc and HSBC Bank PLC and Mizuho Bank, Ltd. as Joint Coordinators and Bookrunners, Mizuho Bank, Ltd. as Facility Agent and the other banks party thereto as Mandated Lead Arrangers (Exhibit 10.1 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated January 19, 2016)
10(n)-£100,000,000 Term Loan Agreement, dated May 24, 2016, between Western Power Distribution (East Midlands) plc and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. (Exhibit 10.1 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated May 26, 2016)
10(o)-£50,000,000 Facility Letter entered into between Western Power Distribution (South West) plc and Svenska Handelsbanken AB dated as of October 11, 2016 (Exhibit 10(a) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-1459) for the quarter ended September 30, 2016)
[_]10(p)-1-Amended and Restated Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, dated June 12, 2000 (Exhibit 10(h) to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2000)
[_]10(p)-2-Amendment No. 1 to said Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, dated December 18, 2002 (Exhibit 10(m)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2002)
[_]10(p)-3-Amendment No. 2 to said Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, dated December 4, 2003 (Exhibit 10(q)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2003)
[_]10(p)-4-Amendment No. 3 to said Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, dated as of January 1, 2005 (Exhibit 10(cc)-4 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2005)


[_]10(p)-5-Amendment No. 4 to said Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, dated as of May 1, 2008 (Exhibit 10(x)-5 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2008)
[_]10(p)-6-Amendment No. 5 to said Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, dated May 28, 2010 (Exhibit 10(a) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended June 30, 2010)
[_]10(p)-7-Amendment No. 6 to said Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, dated as of April 15, 2015 (Exhibit 10(b) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended March 31, 2015)
[_]10(q)-1-PPL Corporation Directors Deferred Compensation Plan Trust Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2001, between PPL Corporation and Wachovia Bank, N.A. (as successor to First Union National Bank), as Trustee (Exhibit 10(hh)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2012)
[_]10(q)-2-PPL Officers Deferred Compensation Plan, PPL Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and PPL Supplemental Compensation Pension Plan Trust Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2001, between PPL Corporation and Wachovia Bank, N.A. (as successor to First Union National Bank), as Trustee (Exhibit 10(hh)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2012)
[_]10(q)-3-PPL Revocable Employee Nonqualified Plans Trust Agreement, dated as of March 20, 2007, between PPL Corporation and Wachovia Bank, N.A., as Trustee (Exhibit 10(c) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-1149) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007)
[_]10(q)-4-PPL Employee Change in Control Agreements Trust Agreement, dated as of March 20, 2007, between PPL Corporation and Wachovia Bank, N.A., as Trustee (Exhibit 10(d) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007)
[_]10(q)-5-PPL Revocable Director Nonqualified Plans Trust Agreement, dated as of March 20, 2007, between PPL Corporation and Wachovia Bank, N.A., as Trustee (Exhibit 10(e) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007)
[_]10(r)-1-Amended and Restated Officers Deferred Compensation Plan, dated December 8, 2003 (Exhibit 10(r) to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2003)
[_]10(r)-2-Amendment No. 1 to said Officers Deferred Compensation Plan, dated as of January 1, 2005 (Exhibit 10(ee)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2005)
[_]10(r)-3-Amendment No. 2 to said Officers Deferred Compensation Plan, dated as of January 22, 2007 (Exhibit 10(bb)-3 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2006)
[_]10(r)-4-Amendment No. 3 to said Officers Deferred Compensation Plan, dated as of June 1, 2008 (Exhibit 10(z)-4 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2008)
[_]10(r)-5-Amendment No. 4 to said Officers Deferred Compensation Plan, dated as of February 15, 2012 (Exhibit 10(ff)-5 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2011)
[_]10(r)-6-Amendment No. 5 to said Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, dated as of May 8, 2014 (Exhibit 10(a) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended June 30, 2014)
[_]10(r)-7-Amendment No. 6 to said Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, dated as of December 16, 2015 (Exhibit [_]10(q)-7 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-1459) for the year ended December 31, 2015)


[_]10(s)-1-Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated December 8, 2003 (Exhibit 10(s) to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2003)
[_]10(s)-2-Amendment No. 1 to said Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated December 16, 2004 (Exhibit 99.1 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated December 17, 2004)
[_]10(s)-3-Amendment No. 2 to said Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated as of January 1, 2005 (Exhibit 10(ff)-3 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2005)
[_]10(s)-4-Amendment No. 3 to said Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated as of January 22, 2007 (Exhibit 10(cc)-4 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2006)
[_]10(s)-5-Amendment No. 4 to said Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated as of December 9, 2008 (Exhibit 10(aa)-5 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2008)
[_]10(s)-6-Amendment No. 5 to said Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated as of February 15, 2012 (Exhibit 10(gg)-6 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2011)
[_]10(t)-1-Amended and Restated Incentive Compensation Plan, effective January 1, 2003 (Exhibit 10(p) to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2002)
[_]10(t)-2-Amendment No. 1 to said Incentive Compensation Plan, dated as of January 1, 2005 (Exhibit 10(gg)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2005)
[_]10(t)-3-Amendment No. 2 to said Incentive Compensation Plan, dated as of January 26, 2007 (Exhibit 10(dd)-3 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2006)
[_]10(t)-4-Amendment No. 3 to said Incentive Compensation Plan, dated as of March 21, 2007 (Exhibit 10(f) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007)
[_]10(t)-5-Amendment No. 4 to said Incentive Compensation Plan, effective December 1, 2007 (Exhibit 10(a) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008)
[_]10(t)-6-Amendment No. 5 to said Incentive Compensation Plan, dated as of December 16, 2008 (Exhibit 10(bb)-6 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2008)
[_]10(t)-7-Form of Stock Option Agreement for stock option awards under the Incentive Compensation Plan (Exhibit 10(a) to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated February 1, 2006)
[_]10(t)-8-Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for restricted stock unit awards under the Incentive Compensation Plan (Exhibit 10(b) to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated February 1, 2006)
[_]10(t)-9-Form of Performance Unit Agreement for performance unit awards under the Incentive Compensation Plan (Exhibit 10(ss) to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2007)
[_]10(u)-1-Amended and Restated Incentive Compensation Plan for Key Employees, effective January 1, 2003 (Schedule B to Proxy Statement of PPL Corporation, dated March 17, 2003)


[_]10(u)-2-Amendment No. 1 to said Incentive Compensation Plan for Key Employees, dated as of January 1, 2005 (Exhibit (hh)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2005)
[_]10(u)-3-Amendment No. 2 to said Incentive Compensation Plan for Key Employees, dated as of January 26, 2007 (Exhibit 10(ee)-3 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2006)
[_]10(u)-4-Amendment No. 3 to said Incentive Compensation Plan for Key Employees, dated as of March 21, 2007 (Exhibit 10(q) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007)
[_]10(u)-5-Amendment No. 4 to said Incentive Compensation Plan for Key Employees, dated as of December 15, 2008 (Exhibit 10(cc)-5 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2008)
[_]10(u)-6-Amendment No. 5 to said Incentive Compensation Plan for Key Employees, dated as of March 24, 2011 (Exhibit 10(a) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011)
[_]10(v)-Short-term Incentive Plan (Annex B to Proxy Statement of PPL Corporation, dated April 12, 2016)
[_]10(w)-Employment letter, dated May 31, 2006, between PPL Services Corporation and William H. Spence (Exhibit 10(pp) to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2006)
[_]10(x)-Form of Retention Agreement entered into between PPL Corporation and Gregory N. Dudkin (Exhibit 10(h) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007)
[_]10(y)-1-Form of Severance Agreement entered into between PPL Corporation and William H. Spence (Exhibit 10(i) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007)
[_]10(y)-2-Amendment to said Severance Agreement (Exhibit 10(a) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009)
[_]10(z)-Form of Change in Control Severance Protection Agreement entered into between PPL Corporation and Gregory N. Dudkin, Joanne H. Raphael, Vincent Sorgi and Victor A. Staffieri (Exhibit 10(b) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended March 31, 2012)
[_]10(aa)-1-PPL Corporation 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (Annex A to Proxy Statement of PPL Corporation, dated April 3, 2012)
[_]10(aa)-2-Form of Performance Unit Agreement for performance unit awards under the Stock Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10(tt)-2 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2012)
[_]10(aa)-3-Form of Performance Contingent Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for restricted stock unit awards under the Stock Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10(tt)-3 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2012)
[_]10(aa)-4-Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for stock option awards under the Stock Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10(tt)-4 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2012)


[_]10(bb)-PPL Corporation Executive Severance Plan, effective as of July 26, 2012 (Exhibit 10(d) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended June 30, 2012)
[_]10(cc)-Form of Western Power Distribution Phantom Stock Option Award Agreement for stock option awards under the Western Power Distribution Long-Term Incentive Plan (Exhibit [_]10(bbb)-1 to PPL Corporation Form 10-K Report (File No. 1-11459) for the year ended December 31, 2014)
[_]10(dd)-Service Agreement (including Change in Control Agreement as Exhibit A), dated March 16, 2015, between Western Power Distribution (South West) plc and Robert A. Symons (Exhibit 10(a) to PPL Corporation Form 10-Q Report (File No. 1-11459) for the quarter ended March 31, 2015)
[_]10(ee)-Form of Retention Agreement, dated May 6, 2015, among PPL Corporation, PPL Services Corporation and Robert J. Grey (Exhibit 99.1 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated May 7, 2015)
[_]10(ff)-Form of Grant Letter dated May 29, 2015 (Exhibit 10.1 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated June 1, 2015)
-PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
-PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
-LG&E and KU Energy LLC and Subsidiaries Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
-Louisville Gas and Electric Company Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
-Kentucky Utilities Company Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
-Subsidiaries of PPL Corporation
-Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP - PPL Corporation
-
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP - PPL Electric Utilities Corporation

-
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP - LG&E and KU Energy LLC

-
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP - Louisville Gas and Electric Company

-Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP - Kentucky Utilities Company


-Consent of Ernst & Young LLP - PPL Corporation
-
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP - PPL Electric Utilities Corporation

-
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP - LG&E and KU Energy LLC

-
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP - Louisville Gas and Electric Company

-Consent of Ernst & Young LLP - Kentucky Utilities Company
-Power of Attorney
-Certificate of PPL's principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
-Certificate of PPL's principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
-Certificate of PPL Electric's principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
-Certificate of PPL Electric's principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
-Certificate of LKE's principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
-Certificate of LKE's principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
-Certificate of LG&E's principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
-Certificate of LG&E's principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
-Certificate of KU's principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
-Certificate of KU's principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
-Certificate of PPL's principal executive officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
-Certificate of PPL Electric's principal executive officer and principal financial officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


-Certificate of LKE's principal executive officer and principal financial officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
-Certificate of LG&E's principal executive officer and principal financial officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
-Certificate of KU's principal executive officer and principal financial officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
-PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries Long-term Debt Schedule
101.INS-XBRL Instance Document for PPL Corporation, PPL Energy Supply, LLC, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company
101.SCH-XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema for PPL Corporation, PPL Corporation, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company
101.CAL-XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase for PPL Corporation, PPL Corporation, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company
101.DEF-XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase for PPL Corporation, PPL Corporation, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company
101.LAB-XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase for PPL Corporation, PPL Corporation, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company
101.PRE-XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase for PPL Corporation, PPL Corporation, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company






270