DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: Portions of the registrant’sMack-Cali Realty Corporation’s definitive proxy statement for fiscal year ended December 31, 20152018 to be issued in conjunction with the registrant’s annual meeting of shareholders expected to be held on June 1, 201612, 2019 are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K. The definitive proxy statement will be filed by the registrant with the SEC not later than 120 days from the end of the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.2018.
EXPLANATORY NOTE
This report combines the annual reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. Unless stated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, references to the “Operating Partnership” mean Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, and references to the “General Partner” mean Mack-Cali Realty Corporation, a Maryland corporation and real estate investment trust (“REIT”), and its subsidiaries, including the Operating Partnership. References to the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” mean collectively the General Partner, the Operating Partnership and those entities/subsidiaries consolidated by the General Partner.
The Operating Partnership conducts the business of providing leasing, management, acquisition, development, construction and tenant-related services for its General Partner. The Operating Partnership, through its operating divisions and subsidiaries, including the Mack-Cali property-owning partnerships and limited liability companies is the entity through which all of the General Partner’s operations are conducted. The General Partner is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and has exclusive control of the Operating Partnership’s day-to-day management.
As of December 31, 2018, the General Partner owned an approximate 89.8 percent common unit interest in the Operating Partnership. The remaining approximate 10.2 percent common unit interest is owned by limited partners. The limited partners of the Operating Partnership are (1) persons who contributed their interests in properties to the Operating Partnership in exchange for common units (each, a “Common Unit”) or preferred units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership or (2) recipients of long term incentive plan units of the Operating Partnership pursuant to the General Partner’s executive compensation plans.
A Common Unit of the Operating Partnership and a share of common stock of the General Partner (the “Common Stock”) have substantially the same economic characteristics in as much as they effectively share equally in the net income or loss of the Company. The General Partner owns a number of common units of the Operating Partnership equal to the number of issued and outstanding shares of the General Partner’s common stock. Common unitholders (other than the General Partner) have the right to redeem their Common Units, subject to certain restrictions under the Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership, as amended (the “Partnership Agreement”), and agreed upon at the time of issuance of the units that may restrict such right for a period of time, generally one year from issuance. The redemption is required to be satisfied in shares of Common Stock of the General Partner, cash, or a combination thereof, calculated as follows: one share of the General Partner’s Common Stock, or cash equal to the fair market value of a share of the General Partner’s Common Stock at the time of redemption, for each Common Unit. The General Partner, in its sole discretion, determines the form of redemption of Common Units (i.e., whether a common unitholder receives Common Stock of the General Partner, cash, or any combination thereof). If the General Partner elects to satisfy the redemption with shares of Common Stock of the General Partner as opposed to cash, the General Partner is obligated to issue shares of its Common Stock to the redeeming unitholder. Regardless of the rights described above, the common unitholders may not put their units for cash to the Company or the General Partner under any circumstances. With each such redemption, the General Partner’s percentage ownership in the Operating Partnership will increase. In addition, whenever the General Partner issues shares of its Common Stock other than to acquire Common Units, the General Partner must contribute any net proceeds it receives to the Operating Partnership and the Operating Partnership must issue to the General Partner an equivalent number of Common Units. This structure is commonly referred to as an umbrella partnership REIT, or UPREIT.
The Company believes that combining the annual reports on Form 10-K of the General Partner and the Operating Partnership into this single report provides the following benefits:
· enhance investors’ understanding of the General Partner and the Operating Partnership by enabling investors to view the business as a whole in the same manner as management views and operates the business of the Company;
· eliminate duplicative disclosure and provide a more streamlined and readable presentation because a substantial portion of the disclosure applies to both the General Partner and the Operating Partnership; and
· create time and cost efficiencies through the preparation of one combined report instead of two separate reports.
The Company believes it is important to understand the few differences between the General Partner and the Operating Partnership in the context of how they operate as a consolidated company. The financial results of the Operating Partnership are consolidated into the financial statements of the General Partner. The General Partner does not have any other significant assets, liabilities or operations, other than its interests in the Operating Partnership, nor does the Operating Partnership have employees of its own. The Operating Partnership, not the General Partner, generally executes all significant business relationships other than transactions involving the securities of the General Partner. The Operating Partnership holds substantially all of the assets of the General Partner, including ownership interests in joint ventures. The Operating Partnership conducts the operations of the business and is structured as a partnership with no publicly traded equity. Except for the net proceeds from equity offerings by the General Partner, which are contributed to the capital of the Operating Partnership in consideration of common or preferred units in the Operating Partnership, as applicable, the Operating Partnership generates all remaining capital required by the Company’s business. These sources include working capital, net cash provided by operating activities, borrowings under the Company’s
unsecured revolving credit facility and unsecured term loan facilities, the issuance of secured and unsecured debt and equity securities and proceeds received from the disposition of properties and joint ventures.
Shareholders’ equity, partners’ capital and noncontrolling interests are the main areas of difference between the consolidated financial statements of the General Partner and the Operating Partnership. The limited partners of the Operating Partnership are accounted for as partners’ capital in the Operating Partnership’s financial statements as is the General Partner’s interest in the Operating Partnership. The noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership’s financial statements comprise the interests of unaffiliated partners in various consolidated partnerships and development joint venture partners. The noncontrolling interests in the General Partner’s financial statements are the same noncontrolling interests at the Operating Partnership’s level and include limited partners of the Operating Partnership. The differences between shareholders’ equity and partners’ capital result from differences in the equity issued at the General Partner and Operating Partnership levels.
To help investors better understand the key differences between the General Partner and the Operating Partnership, certain information for the General Partner and the Operating Partnership in this report has been separated, as set forth below:
· Item 6. Selected Financial Data;
· Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations includes information specific to each entity, where applicable;
· Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data which includes the following specific disclosures for Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Mack-Cali Realty, L.P.:
· Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies, where applicable;
· Note 14. Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests;
· Note 15. Mack-Cali Realty Corporation’s Stockholders’ Equity and Mack-Cali Realty, L.P.’s Partners’ Capital;
· Note 16. Noncontrolling Interests in Subsidiaries;
· Note 17. Segment Reporting, where applicable; and
· Note 19. Condensed Quarterly Financial Information (unaudited).
This report also includes separate Part II, Item 9A. Controls and Procedures sections and separate Exhibits 31 and 32 certifications for each of the General Partner and the Operating Partnership in order to establish that the requisite certifications have been made and that the General Partner and Operating Partnership are compliant with Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. §1350.
FORM 10-K
Page No. | ||||
5 | ||||
11 | ||||
22 | ||||
23 | ||||
34 | ||||
34 | ||||
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters | ||||
| and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | 35 | |||
37 | ||||
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and | ||||
| Results of Operations | 39 | |||
64 | ||||
64 | ||||
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure | 64 | |||
64 | ||||
66 | ||||
67 | ||||
67 | ||||
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management | ||||
| and Related Stockholder Matters | 67 | |||
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence | 67 | |||
67 | ||||
68 | ||||
68 | ||||
129 | ||||
138 | ||||
Mack-Cali Realty Corporation, a Maryland corporation, together with its subsidiaries (collectively the “Company”“General Partner”), is a fully-integrated, self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that. The General Partner controls Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, together with its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Operating Partnership”), as its sole general partner and owned an 89.8 percent and 89.6 percent common unit interest in the Operating Partnership as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. The General Partner’s business is the ownership of interests in and operation of the Operating Partnership and all of the General Partner’s expenses are incurred for the benefit of the Operating Partnership. The General Partner is reimbursed by the Operating Partnership for all expenses it incurs relating to the ownership and operation of the Operating Partnership.
The Operating Partnership conducts the business of providing leasing, management, acquisition, development, construction and tenant-related services for its General Partner. The Operating Partnership, through its operating divisions and subsidiaries, including the Mack-Cali property-owning partnerships and limited liability companies, is the entity through which all of the General Partner’s operations are conducted. Unless stated otherwise or the context requires, the “Company” refers to the General Partner and its subsidiaries, including the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries.
The Company owns and operates a real estate portfolio comprised predominantly of Class A office and office/flex properties located primarily in the Northeast with a recent emphasis on expansion into the multi-family rental sector in the same markets. The Company performs substantially all real estate leasing, management, acquisition development and construction servicesdevelopment on an in-house basis. Mack-Cali Realty Corporation was incorporated on May 24, 1994. The Company’s executive offices are located at 343 ThornallHarborside 3, 210 Hudson Street, Edison,Suite 400, Jersey City, New Jersey 08837-2206,07311, and its telephone number is (732) 590-1000.590-1010. The Company has an internet website at www.mack-cali.com.
As of December 31, 2015,2018, the Company owned or had interests in 275135 properties, consisting of 14756 office and 10955 flex properties, totaling approximately 29.915.4 million square feet, leased to approximately 1,900700 commercial tenants and 1924 multi-family rental properties containing 5,6446,910 residential units, plus developable land (collectively, the “Properties”). The Properties are comprised of: (a) 223120 wholly-owned or Company-controlled properties consisting of 11152 office buildings and 10652 flex buildings aggregating approximately 24.214.9 million square feet and six16 multi-family properties totaling 1,301 apartments,3,988 apartment units, (collectively, the “Consolidated Properties”); and (b) 36four office properties totaling approximately 5.60.5 million square feet, 13eight multi-family properties totaling 4,343 apartments,2,922 apartment units, two retail properties totaling 81,700 square feet and a 350-room hotel, which are owned by unconsolidated joint ventures in which the Company has investment interests. Unless otherwise indicated, all references to square feet represent net rentable area. As of December 31, 2015,2018, the Company’s core, stabilized office and flex properties included in the Consolidated Properties were 86.283.2 percent leased. Percentage leased includes all leases in effect as of the period end date, some of which have commencement dates in the future, and leases that expire at the period end date. Leases that expired as of December 31, 20152018 aggregate 69,52210,108 square feet, or 0.30.1 percent of the net rentable square footage. The Properties are located in sevensix states, primarily in the Northeast, and the District of Columbia. See Item 2: Properties.
The Company’s new management team assessed the Company’s historical strategy of focusinghas been to focus its operations, acquisition and development of office properties in high-barrier-to-entry markets and sub-markets where it believes it is, or can become, a significant and preferred owner and operator. In September 2015, the Company announced a three-year strategic initiative to transform into a more concentrated owner of New Jersey Hudson River waterfront and transit-oriented office properties and a regional owner of luxury multi-family residential properties. In furtherance of this strategy, the Company has commenced a comprehensive review of its portfolio and operations and is developing a business strategy that focuses on reshaping its portfolio over time. As part of this plan, over the past three years, the Company anticipates thatsold or has contracted to sell multiple properties, primarily commercial office, which it may dispose of a significant portion of its properties thatbelieves do not meet its long-term goals, and, in September 2015, compiled a list of its properties that it considers as non-core to its ongoing operations. Specifically, the Company considers a non-core property to have one or more of the following attributes: (1) assets that do not offer an opportunity to create a competitive advantage; (2) assets that produce a low cash yield; (3) assets which have physical attributes that constrain their market competitiveness; and (4) assets located in low growth markets. The Company believes that the potential sales of these non-core properties over time would result in total estimated sales proceeds ranging from approximately $600 million to $800 million.
The Company believes that its Properties have excellent locations and access and are well-maintained and professionally managed. As a result, the Company believes that its Properties attract high quality tenants and residents, and achieve high rental, occupancy and tenant retention rates within their markets. The Company also believes that its extensive market knowledge provides it with a significant competitive advantage, which is further enhanced by its strong reputation for, and emphasis on, delivering highly responsive, professional management services.
BUSINESS STRATEGIES
Operations
Reputation: The Company has established a reputation as a highly-regarded landlord with an emphasis on delivering quality customer service in buildings it owns and/or manages. The Company believes that its continued success depends in part on enhancing its reputation as an operator of choice, which will facilitate the retention of current tenants and residents and the attraction of new tenants
and residents. The Company believes it provides a superior level of service to its customers which shouldthat is an important factor in turn, allow the Companyworking to maintain occupancy rates, at or above market levels,achieve positive leasing results as well as improveimproving tenant retention.
Communication with tenants: The Company emphasizes frequent communication with its customers to ensure first-class service to the Properties. Property management personnel generally are located on site at the Properties to provide convenient access to management and to ensure that the Properties are well-maintained. Property management’s primary responsibility is to ensure that buildings are operated at peak efficiency in order to meet both the Company’s and tenants’ needs and expectations. Property management personnel additionally budget and oversee capital improvements and building system upgrades to enhance the Properties’ competitive advantages in their respective markets and to maintain the quality of the Properties.
The Company’s in-house leasing representatives for its office portfolio develop and maintain long-term relationships with the Company’s diverse tenant base and coordinate leasing, expansion, relocation and build-to-suit opportunities. This approach allows the Company to offer office space in the appropriate size and location to current or prospective tenants in any of its sub-markets.
The Company’s in-house multi-family rental management team emphasizes meticulous attention to detail and an unwavering commitment to customer service to complement the quality, design excellence and luxury living attributes of its multi-family rental properties. The Company believes this strategy will enable the Company to buttress management’s reputation with the market-leading designs, amenities and features of its multi-family rental properties to attract quality residents.
Portfolio Management: The Company plans to continue to own and operate a portfolio of office and office/flex properties in high-barrier-to-entry markets, with a primary focus in the Northeast. The Company also expects to continue to complement its core portfolio of office and office/flex properties by pursuing acquisition and development opportunities in the multi-family rental sector. The Company’s primary objectives are to maximize operating cash flow and to enhance the value of its portfolio through effective management, acquisition, development and property sales strategies.
The Company seeks to maximize the value of its existing office and office/flex portfolio through implementing operating strategies designed to produce the highest effective rental and occupancy rates and lowest tenant installation costs within the markets that it operates, and further within the parameters of those markets. The Company continues to pursue internal growth through leasing vacant space, re-leasing space at the highest possible effective rents in light of current market conditions with contractual rent increases and developing or redeveloping office space for its diverse base of high credit quality tenants, including Daiichi Sankyo, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi FUJI LtdUFJ Ltd; KPMG, LLP; and The United States of America - GSA.TD Ameritrade Services Company. In addition, the Company seeks economies of scale through volume discounts to take advantage of its size and dominance in particular sub-markets, and operating efficiencies through the use of in-house management, leasing, marketing, financing, accounting, legal development and construction services.
The Company continually reviews its portfolio and opportunities to divest office and office/flex properties that, among other things, no longer meet its long-term strategy, have reached their potential, are less efficient to operate or can be sold at attractive prices when market conditions are favorable. The Company anticipates redeployingcontinuing to redeploy the proceeds from sales of office and office/flex properties to develop, redevelop and acquire multi-family rental properties, as well as reposition certain office properties into multi-family/mixed use properties, in its core Northeast sub-markets as part of its overall strategy to reposition its portfolio from office and office/flex to a mix of office, office/flex and multi-family rental properties.
The Company believes that the opportunity to invest in multi-family development properties at higher returns on cost will position the Company to potentially produce higher levels of net operating income than if the Company were to only purchase stabilized multi-family properties at market returns. The Company anticipates that it will be several years before its multi-family development projects are income-producing. The Company believes that the transition to a company with a greater proportion of its properties in the multi-family residential sector will ultimately result in the creation of greater shareholder value than remaining a primarily suburban commercial office company, in part due to the lower capitalization rates associated with the multi-family sector.
Acquisitions: The Company also believes that growth opportunities exist through acquiring operating properties or properties for redevelopment with attractive returns in its core Northeast sub-markets where, based on its expertise in leasing, managing and operating properties, it believes it is, or can become, a significant and preferred owner and operator. The Company intends either directly or through joint ventures to acquire, invest in or redevelop additional properties, that: (i) are expected to provide attractive long-term yields; (ii) are well-located, of high quality and competitive in their respective sub-markets; (iii) are located in its existing sub-markets or in sub-markets in which the Company is or can become a significant and preferred owner and operator; and (iv) it believes have been under-managed or are otherwise capable of improved performance through intensive management, capital improvements and/or leasing that should result in increased effective rental and occupancy rates.
The Company has entered into and may continue in the future to enter into joint ventures (including limited liability companies and partnerships) through which it would own an indirect economic interest of less than 100 percent of a property owned directly by such
joint ventures, and may include joint ventures that the Company does not control or manage, especially in connection with its expansion into the multi-family rental sector. The decision to pursue property acquisitions either directly or through joint ventures is based on a variety of factors and considerations, including: (i) the economic and tax terms required by a seller or co-developer of a property; (ii) the Company’s desire to diversify its portfolio by expanding into the multi-family rental sector and achieve a blended portfolio of office and multi-family rental properties by market and sub-market; (iii) the Company’s goal of maintaining a strong balance sheet; and (iv) the Company’s expectation that, in some circumstances, it will be able to achieve higher returns on its invested capital or reduce its risk if a joint venture vehicle is used. Investments in joint ventures are not limited to a specified percentage of the Company’s assets. Each joint venture agreement is individually negotiated, and the Company’s ability to operate and/or dispose of its interests in a joint venture in its sole discretion may be limited to varying degrees depending on the terms of the joint venture agreement. Many of the Company’s joint venture agreements entitle it to receive leasing, management, development and similar fees and/or a promoted interest if certain return thresholds are met. See Note 4: Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures –— to the Company’s Financial Statements.
Development: The Company seeks to selectively develop additional properties either directly or through joint ventures where it believes such development will result in a favorable risk-adjusted return on investment in coordination with the above operating strategies. The Company identifies development opportunities primarily through its local market presence. Such development primarily will occur: (i) in stable core Northeast sub-markets where the demand for such space exceeds available supply; and (ii) where the Company is, or can become, a significant and preferred owner and operator. As part of the Company’s strategy to expand its multi-family rental portfolio, the Company may consider development opportunities with respect to improved land with existing commercial uses and seek to rezone the sites for multi-family rental use and development. As a result of competitive market conditions for land suitable for development, the Company may be required to hold land prior to construction for extended periods while entitlements or rezoning is obtained. The Company also may undertake repositioning opportunities that may require the expenditure of significant amounts of capital.
Property Sales: While management’s principal intention is to own and operate its properties on a long-term basis, it periodically assesses the attributes of each of its properties, with a particular focus on the supply and demand fundamentals of the sub-markets in which they are located. As a result of this assessment during 2015, the Company has identified non-core office properties that it may sell over time for total estimated sales proceeds that it believes may be between approximately $600 million and $800 million. The Company continually reviews its portfolio and opportunities to divest properties that, among other things, no longer meet its long-term strategy, have reached their potential, are less efficient to operate, or can be sold at attractive prices when market conditions are favorable. Consistent with its strategic initiative announced in 2015, the Company completed the sale of rental property for aggregate gross sales proceeds of $385.1 million during 2018 and $415.6 million during 2017.
Financial
The Company currently intends to maintain a ratio of debt-to-undepreciated assets (total debt of the Company as a percentage of total undepreciated assets) of 50 percent or less, however there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in maintaining this ratio. As of December 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, the Company’s total debt constituted approximately 39.045 percent and 37.347 percent of total undepreciated assets of the Company, respectively. The decrease in this ratio in 2018 was primarily the result of using proceeds from property sales to repay outstanding debt during the year. Although there is no limit in the Company’s organizational documents on the amount of indebtedness that the Company may incur, the Company has entered into certain financial agreements which contain covenants that limit the Company’s ability to incur indebtedness under certain circumstances. The Company intends to utilize the most appropriate sources of capital for future acquisitions, development, capital improvements and other investments, which may include funds from operating activities, proceeds from property and land sales, joint venture capital, and short-term and long-term borrowings (including draws on the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility), and the issuance of additional debt or equity securities.
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 2015,2018, the Company had approximately 530352 full-time employees.
COMPETITION
The leasing of real estate is highly competitive. The Properties compete for tenants and residents with lessors and developers of similar properties located in their respective markets primarily on the basis of location, the quality of properties, leasing terms (including rent and other charges and allowances for tenant improvements), services or amenities provided, the design and condition of the Properties, and reputation as an owner and operator of quality properties in the relevant markets. Additionally, the number of competitive multi-family rental properties in a particular area could have a material effect on the Company’s ability to lease residential units and on rents charged. In addition, other forms of multi-family rental properties or single family housing provide alternatives to potential residents of multi-family properties. The Company competes with other entities, some of which may have significant resources or who may be willing to accept lower returns or pay higher prices than the Company in terms of acquisition and development opportunities. The Company also experiences competition when attempting to acquire or dispose of real estate, including competition from domestic and foreign financial institutions, other REITs, life insurance companies, pension trusts, trust funds, partnerships, individual investors and others.
REGULATIONS
Many laws and governmental regulations apply to the ownership and/or operation of the Properties and changes in these laws and regulations, or their interpretation by agencies and the courts, occur frequently.
Under various laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment and human health, an owner of real estate may be held liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances located on or in the property. These laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner was responsible for, or even knew of, the presence of such substances. The presence of such substances may adversely affect the owner’s ability to rent or sell the property or to borrow using such property as collateral and may expose it to liability resulting from any release of, or exposure to, such substances. Persons who arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances at another location may also be liable for the costs of removalremoval or remediation of such substances at the disposal or treatment facility, whether or not such facility is owned or operated by such person. Certain environmental laws impose liability for the release of asbestos-containing materials into the air, and third parties may also seek recovery from owners or operators of real properties for personal injury associated with asbestos-containing materials and other hazardous or toxic substances.
In connection with the ownership (direct or indirect), operation, management and development of real properties, the Company may be considered an owner or operator of such properties or as having arranged for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances and, therefore, potentially liable for removal or remediation costs, as well as certain other related costs, including governmental penalties and injuries to persons and property.
There can be no assurance that (i) future laws, ordinances or regulations will not impose any material environmental liability, (ii) the current environmental condition of the Properties will not be affected by tenants, by the condition of land or operations in the vicinity of the Properties (such as the presence of underground storage tanks), or by third parties unrelated to the Company, or (iii) the Company’s assessments reveal all environmental liabilities and that there are no material environmental liabilities of which the Company is aware. If compliance with the various laws and regulations, now existing or hereafter adopted, exceeds the Company’s budgets for such items, the Company’s ability to make expected distributions to stockholders could be adversely affected.
There are no other laws or regulations which have a material effect on the Company’s operations, other than typical federal, state and local laws affecting the development and operation of real property, such as zoning laws.
INDUSTRY SEGMENTS
The Company operates in threetwo industry segments: (i) commercial and other real estate and (ii) multi-family real estate and (iii) multi-family services. As of December 31, 2015,2018, the Company does not have any foreign operations and its business is not seasonal. Please see our financial statements attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein for financial information relating to our industry segments.
SIGNIFICANT TENANTS
As of December 31, 2015,2018, no tenant accounted for more than 10 percent of the Company’s consolidated revenues.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
Management Changes
In March 2018, the Company acquiredannounced the appointment of Michael J. DeMarco, Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner, to its Board of Directors effective March 14, 2018. Mr. DeMarco’s addition to the Board expanded the total number of members from nine to ten. In February 2019, the Company announced that the Board of Directors increased its size from ten to eleven members, effective immediately, and nominated a vacant 147,241 square-footslate of eleven candidates consisting of Lisa Myers, Laura Pomerantz and all of the current directors of the Company (other than Kenneth M. Duberstein, who decided not to stand for re-election and will retire from the Board of Directors at the Company’s 2019 annual meeting of shareholders) for election to the Board of Directors at the Company’s 2019 annual meeting of shareholders, which is expected to be held on June 12, 2019.
In January 2018, the Company announced the appointment of David J. Smetana as chief financial officer and Nicholas Hilton as executive vice president of leasing of the General Partner. Mr. Smetana began to perform his duties as chief financial officer and Anthony Krug ceased to serve as chief financial officer immediately following the filing of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. Mr. Krug remained an employee of the Company and provided transition services through March 31, 2018. Mr. Hilton’s employment commenced on February 12, 2018 following the departure of Christopher DeLorenzo.
In June 2018, the Company announced that the employment of Mitchell E. Rudin as Vice Chairman of the General Partner was terminated effective as of June 5, 2018. In November 2018, the Company announced that the employment of Robert Andrew Marshall as President and Executive Vice President of Development of Roseland Residential Trust (“RRT”) was terminated effective as of October 31, 2018. In addition, the Company also restructured certain other corporate and property management personnel during the year ended December 31, 2018.
Acquisitions
On February 6, 2019, the Company completed the acquisition of a 271,988 square foot office property located in Iselin, New Jersey, for a purchase price of $61.5 million, which was funded using funds available with the Mack-Cali Business CampusCompany’s qualified intermediary and borrowings under the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility.
On January 25, 2019, the Company signed an agreement to acquire a 377-unit multi-family rental property located in Parsippany,Jersey City, New Jersey for approximately $10.3$264 million, subject to certain conditions. The acquisition is expected to be completed in the second quarter 2019.
Consolidations
On August 2, 2018, the Company, which held a 24.27 percent subordinated interest in the unconsolidated joint venture, Marbella Tower Urban Renewal Associates LLC, a 412-unit multi-family operating property located in Jersey City, New Jersey, acquired its equity partner’s 50 percent interest for $65.6 million in cash. The property was subject to a mortgage loan that had a principal balance of $95 million. The cash portion of the acquisition was funded primarily through borrowings under the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility. This property is currentlyConcurrently with the closing, the joint venture repaid the $95 million mortgage loan in redevelopmentfull and obtained a new loan collateralized by the Company.
Properties Commencing Initial Operations
During the year ended December 31, 2018, four multi-family rental properties and a hotel with a total of 1,317 apartment units and rooms commenced initial operations for total development costs of approximately $458 million.
Dispositions
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company disposed of 30 office properties and a developable land property adjacent to an existing Mack-Cali property located in Edison, New Jersey for approximately $53.1 million, which was funded primarily through borrowings under the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility.
The Company announced a three-year strategic initiative to transform the Company into a more concentrated owner of New Jersey Hudson River waterfront and transit-orientedidentified as held for sale six office properties and a regional ownermulti-family rental property as of luxury multi-family residential properties. In connection withDecember 31, 2018. The total estimated sales proceeds, net of expected selling costs, from the transformationsales are expected to be approximately $124 million. The Company determined that the carrying value of four of the Company’s portfolio, management began developing a disposition planproperties was not expected to be recovered from estimated net sales proceeds and accordingly recognized an unrealized loss allowance of $20.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Land Impairments
The Company owns two separate developable land parcels in September 2015, which will be an ongoing assessment process. Through this plan,Conshohocken and Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, that were being considered for development into multi-family rental properties. During the fourth quarter 2018, the Company inmade the coming years, expectsdecision to dispose of primarily office properties considered non-core to its ongoing operations. As a result, at September 30, 2015,pursue selling the Company evaluated the recoverability of the carrying values of these non-core properties, and determined that dueland parcels rather than developing them. Due to the shortening of the expected periods of ownership, the Company determined that it was necessary to reduce the carrying values of 22 rental properties to their estimated fair values. Accordingly, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $158.6 million at September 30, 2015 reducing the aggregate carrying values of these properties from $554.3 millionland parcels to their estimated fair values (ascertained by broker opinions of $395.7 million. Atvalue obtained during the marketing process) and recorded total land impairments charges of $24.6 million at December 31, 2015, as2018.
Joint Venture Activity
On January 31, 2019, the Company, which held a 24.27 percent subordinated interest in the unconsolidated joint venture, Marbella Tower Urban Renewal Associates South LLC, a 311-unit multi-family operating property located in Jersey City, New Jersey, acquired
its equity partner’s 50 percent interest for $77.5 million in cash. The acquisition was funded primarily using available cash. Concurrently with the closing, the joint venture repaid in full the property’s $74.7 million mortgage loan and obtained a new loan in the amount of $117 million.
On December 11, 2018, the Company acquired one of its partner’s interest in the unconsolidated joint venture that owns the Metropolitan and Shops at 40 Park and the Lofts at 40 Park for $1.3 million. As a result, of its periodic evaluation of the recoverability of the carrying values resulting from its ongoing assessment of non-core properties, the Company recorded an additional impairment charge of $33.7 million.
Development Activity
In 2015, the Company entered into a 90-percent owned joint venture partnership with XS Port Imperial Hotel, LLC (“XS”) to form XS Hotel Urban Renewal Associates LLC, (“XS Hotel URA”) for the developmentwhich is developing a 372-key hotel (164 keys Residence Inn and ownership of a 364-key dual branded hotel property located208 keys Marriott Envue) in Weehawken, New Jersey (“Port Imperial Hotel”). Concurrently,Jersey. The Residence Inn opened in 4Q 2018 and the Company and XS entered into a separate joint venture partnershipMarriott Envue is expected to form XS Hotel Associates, L.L.C. (“XS Hotel”) for the management and operations of the completed hotel development. The Company holds a 90 percent interest and XS holds the remaining 10 percent interestopen in the consolidated joint ventures, XS Hotel URA and XS Hotel, with the Company having full and complete authority, power, and discretion to manage and control the ventures’ business, affairs, and property.2Q 2019. The construction of the Port Imperial Hotelproject is estimated to cost a total$159.9 million, with construction costs of $105.9$147.1 million which willincurred by the venture through December 31, 2018. The project costs are expected to be funded byfrom a $94 million construction loan with the balance to be funded with members’ capital. Upon closing, Mack-Cali’s initial contribution was $27.3(with $73.4 million which included a capital credit of $23.7 million for its contributed Hotel Condominium Land unit, and XS Hotel’s initial contribution was $3 million. Asoutstanding as of December 31, 2015, the Company incurred development costs of $1.5 million and estimates it will need to fund an additional $3.3 million for the completion of the project.
The Company owns developable land to accommodateis developing a multi-phase development313-unit multi-family project of approximately 1,034-unit multi-family rental property locatedknown as Building 8/9 at Port Imperial in Malden, Massachusetts. The initial phase commencedWeehawken, New Jersey, which began construction of 292 units in the third quarter of 2015 (the “Chase II Project”).2018. The Chase II Projectconstruction project, which is estimated to cost a total$142.6 million, of $74.9which construction costs of $35.4 million (of which the Company hashave been incurred $22.1 million through December 31, 2015) and2018, is expected to be ready for occupancy by secondin fourth quarter 2017.2020. The Company estimates it will needis expected to fund additional$50.6 million of the construction costs, of $4.8 million for the completion of the Chase II Project. On December 16, 2015,which the Company obtained a construction loan with a maximum borrowing amount of $48has funded $35.4 million (with no outstanding balance as of December 31, 2015), which bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 2.25 percent, reducing to LIBOR plus 2.0 percent subject to achieving certain conditions and matures in December 2018.
The Company is owned by ISA, with shared control over major decisions suchdeveloping a 326-unit multi-family project known as approval of budgets, property financings and leasing guidelines.Chase III at Overlook Ridge, in Malden, Massachusetts, which began construction in third quarter 2018. The construction of the URL Projectproject, which is estimated to cost a total$99.9 million of approximately $320 million (of which development costs of $210.2$20.2 million have been incurred by URL-Harborside through December 31, 2015). The URL Project is projected to be ready for occupancy by the fourth quarter of 2016. The venture has a construction/permanent loan with a maximum borrowing amount of $192 million (with $63.9 million outstanding as of December 31, 2015), which bears interest at a rate of 5.197 percent and matures in August 2029. The Company does not expect to fund any future development costs of the project, as future development costs will be funded by using the loan financing.
construction loan.
|
Of the Company’s core office markets, have shownmost continue to show signs of recent improvement.rental rate improvement while the leased percentage has declined or stabilized. The percentage leased in the Company’s consolidated portfolio of stabilized core operating commercial properties was 86.283.2 percent at December 31, 2015,2018, as compared to 84.287.6 percent at December 31, 20142017 and 86.190.6 percent at December 31, 2013.2016 (after adjusting for properties identified as non-core at the time). Percentage leased includes all leases in effect as of the period end date, some of which have commencement dates in the future and leases that expire at the period end date. Leases that expired as of December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016 aggregate 69,522, 205,22010,108, 343,217 and 690,895151,655 square feet, respectively, or 0.3, 0.80.1, 2.3 and 2.50.7 percentage of the net rentable square footage, respectively. TheWith the positive rental rate results the Company believes that commercial vacancy rates have stabilizedhas achieved in most of its markets andrecently, the Company believes that rental rates on new leases will generally be, on average, not lower than rates currently being paid. If these recent leasing results do not prove to be sustaining during 2019, the Company may decrease in some of its markets through 2016.
FINANCING ACTIVITY
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company obtained new mortgage debt aggregating approximately $328 million, collateralized by 3 properties, with effective interest rates ranging from 4.17 percent to 4.56 percent. On August 2, 2018, the Company obtained $131 million of mortgage debt in connection with the Company’s acquisition and consolidation of its joint venture partner’s majority ownership interest in Marbella. On December 7, 2018, the Company retired $70 million of construction debt associated with the Portside 5/6 development project, replacing it with a new $350$97 million unsecured term loan,permanent mortgage. On December 17, 2018, the Company retired $70.1 million of construction debt associated with the River House 11 development project, replacing it with a $100 million permanent mortgage. On January 8, 2018, the Company prepaid mortgage debt of approximately $209 million that encumbered the Company’s property at Harborside Plaza 5, for which matures in January 2019 with two one-year extension options. The interest rate for the new term loan is currently 140 basis points over LIBOR, subject to adjustment on a sliding scale based on the Company's unsecured debt ratings, or at the Company's option, a defined leverage ratio. The Company entered into interest rate swap arrangements to fix LIBOR for the durationit incurred costs of the term loan. Including costs, the loan provides for a current all-in fixed rate of 3.12 percent. The proceeds from the loan were used primarily to repay outstanding borrowings on its unsecured revolving credit facility and to repay the Company's $200 million, 5.8 percent senior unsecured notes that matured on January 15, 2016.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
The Company’s internet website is www.mack-cali.com. The Company makes available free of charge on or through its website itsthe annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished by the General Partner or the Operating Partnership pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after it electronically files or furnishes such materials to the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, the Company’s internet website includes other items related to corporate governance matters, including, among other things, the Company’sGeneral Partner’s corporate governance principles, charters of various committees of the Board of Directors of
the General Partner and the Company’sGeneral Partner’s code of business conduct and ethics applicable to all employees, officers and directors. The CompanyGeneral Partner intends to disclose on itsthe Company’s internet website any amendments to or waivers from its code of business conduct and ethics as well as any amendments to its corporate governance principles or the charters of various committees of the Board of Directors. Copies of these documents may be obtained, free of charge, from our internet website. Any shareholder also may obtain copies of these documents, free of charge, by sending a request in writing to: Mack-Cali Investor Relations Department, 343 Thornall Street, Edison,Harborside 3, 210 Hudson St., Ste. 400, Jersey City, NJ 08837-2206.
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
We consider portions of this report, including the documents incorporated by reference, to be forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in Section 21E of such act. Such forward-looking statements relate to, without limitation, our future economic performance, plans and objectives for future operations and projections of revenue and other financial items. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “plan,” “potential,” “projected,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “continue”“target,” “continue,” or comparable terminology. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to certain risks, trends and uncertainties, many of which we cannot predict with accuracy and some of which we might not even anticipate. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions at the time made, we can give no assurance that such expectations will be achieved. Future events and actual results, financial and otherwise, may differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.
Among the factors about which we have made assumptions are:
· risks and uncertainties affecting the general economic climate and conditions, which in turn may have a negative effect on the fundamentals of our business and the financial condition of our tenants and residents;
· the value of our real estate assets, which may limit our ability to dispose of assets at attractive prices or obtain or maintain debt financing secured by our properties or on an unsecured basis;
· the extent of any tenant bankruptcies or of any early lease terminations;
· our ability to lease or re-lease space at current or anticipated rents;
· changes in the supply of and demand for our properties;
· changes in interest rate levels and volatility in the securities markets;
· our ability to complete construction and development activities on time and within budget, including without limitation obtaining regulatory permits and the availability and cost of materials, labor and equipment;
· forward-looking financial and operational information, including information relating to future development projects, potential acquisitions or dispositions, leasing activities, capitalization rates, and projected revenue and income;
· changes in operating costs;
· our ability to obtain adequate insurance, including coverage for terrorist acts;
· our credit worthiness and the availability of financing on attractive terms or at all, which may adversely impact our ability to pursue acquisition and development opportunities and refinance existing debt and our future interest expense;
· changes in governmental regulation, tax rates and similar matters; and
· other risks associated with the development and acquisition of properties, including risks that the development may not be completed on schedule, that the tenants or residents will not take occupancy or pay rent, or that development or operating costs may be greater than anticipated.
For further information on factors which could impact us and the statements contained herein, see Item 1A: Risk Factors. We assume no obligation to update and supplement forward-looking statements that become untrue because of subsequent events, new information or otherwise.
ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS
Our results from operations and ability to make distributions on our equity and debt service on our indebtedness may be affected by the risk factors set forth below. All investors should consider the following risk factors before deciding to purchase securities of the Company. The Company refers to itself as “we” or “our” in the following risk factors.
Adverse economic and geopolitical conditions in general and the Northeastern suburban office markets in particular could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and our ability to pay distributions to you.
Our business may be affected by the continuing volatility in the financial and credit markets, the general global economic conditions,
continuing high unemployment, and other market or economic challenges experienced by the U.S. economy or the real estate industry as a whole. Our business also may be adversely affected by local economic conditions, as substantially all of our revenues are derived from our properties located in the Northeast, particularly in New Jersey and New York. Because our portfolio currently consists primarily of office and office/flex buildings (as compared to a more diversified real estate portfolio) located principally in the Northeast, if economic conditions persist or deteriorate, then our results of operations, financial condition and ability to service current debt and to pay distributions to our shareholders may be adversely affected by the following, among other potential conditions:
· significant job losses in the financial and professional services industries may occur, which may decrease demand for our office space, causing market rental rates and property values to be negatively impacted;
· our ability to borrow on terms and conditions that we find acceptable, or at all, may be limited, which could reduce our ability to pursue acquisition and development opportunities and refinance existing debt, reduce our returns from both our existing operations and our acquisition and development activities and increase our future interest expense;
· reduced values of our properties may limit our ability to dispose of assets at attractive prices or to obtain debt financing secured by our properties and may reduce the availability of unsecured loans;
· the value and liquidity of our short-term investments and cash deposits could be reduced as a result of a deterioration of the financial condition of the institutions that hold our cash deposits or the institutions or assets in which we have made short-term investments, the dislocation of the markets for our short-term investments, increased volatility in market rates for such investments or other factors;
· reduced liquidity in debt markets and increased credit risk premiums for certain market participants may impair our ability to access capital; and
· one or more lenders under our line of credit could refuse or be unable to fund their financing commitment to us and we may not be able to replace the financing commitment of any such lenders on favorable terms, or at all.
These conditions, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to pay distributions, may continue or worsen in the future.
Our performance is subject to risks associated with the real estate industry.
General: Our business and our ability to make distributions or payments to our investors depend on the ability of our properties to generate funds in excess of operating expenses (including scheduled principal payments on debt and capital expenditures). Events or conditions that are beyond our control may adversely affect our operations and the value of our Properties.properties. Such events or conditions could include:
· changes in the general economic climate and conditions;
· changes in local conditions, such as an oversupply of office space, a reduction in demand for office space, or reductions in office market rental rates;
· an oversupply or reduced demand for multi-family apartments caused by a decline in household formation, decline in employment or otherwise;
·decreased attractiveness of our properties to tenants and residents;
· competition from other office and office/flex and multi-family properties;
· development by competitors of competing multi-family communities;
· unwillingness of tenants to pay rent increases;
· rent control or rent stabilization laws, or other housing laws and regulations that could prevent us from raising multi-family rents to offset increases in operating costs;
·our inability to provide adequate maintenance;
·
· changes in laws and regulations (including tax, environmental, zoning and building codes, landlord/tenant and other housing laws and regulations) and agency or court interpretations of such laws and regulations and the related costs of compliance;
· changes in interest rate levels and the availability of financing;
· the inability of a significant number of tenants or residents to pay rent;
· our inability to rent office or multi-family rental space on favorable terms; and
· civil unrest, earthquakes, acts of terrorism and other natural disasters or acts of God that may result in uninsured losses.
We may suffer adverse consequences if our revenues decline since our operating costs do not necessarily decline in proportion to our revenue: We earn a significant portion of our income from renting our properties. Our operating costs, however, do not necessarily fluctuate in relation to changes in our rental revenue. This means that our costs will not necessarily decline even if our revenues do. Our operating costs could also increase while our revenues do not. If our operating costs increase but our rental revenues do not, we may be forced to borrow to cover our costs and we may incur losses. Such losses may adversely affect our ability to make distributions or payments to our investors.
Financially distressed tenants may be unable to pay rent: If a tenant defaults, we may experience delays and incur substantial costs in enforcing our rights as landlord and protecting our investments. If a tenant files for bankruptcy, we cannot evict the tenant solely because of the bankruptcy and a potential court judgment rejecting and terminating such tenant’s lease (which would subject all future unpaid rent to a statutory cap) could adversely affect our ability to make distributions or payments to our investors as we may be unable to replace the defaulting tenant with a new tenant at a comparable rental rate without incurring significant expenses or a reduction in rental income.
Renewing leases or re-letting space could be costly: If a tenant does not renew its lease upon expiration or terminates its lease early, we may not be able to re-lease the space on favorable terms or at all. If a tenant does renew its lease or we re-lease the space, the terms of the renewal or new lease, including the cost of required renovations or concessions to the tenant, may be less favorable than the current lease terms, which could adversely affect our ability to make distributions or payments to our investors.
Adverse developments concerning some of our major tenants and industry concentrations could have a negative impact on our revenue: We have tenants concentrated in various industries that may be experiencing adverse effects of current economic conditions. For instance, 14.820.3 percent of our revenue is derived from tenants in the Securities, Commodity Contracts and Other Financial industry, 10.711.8 percent from tenants in the Credit Intermediation and Related Activities industry and 11.3 percent from tenants in the Insurance Carriers and Related Activities industry and 7.5 percent from tenants in the Manufacturing industry. Our business could be adversely affected if any of these industries suffered a downturn and/or these tenants or any other tenants became insolvent, declared bankruptcy or otherwise refused to pay rent in a timely manner or at all.
Our insurance coverage on our properties may be inadequate or our insurance providers may default on their obligations to pay claims: We currently carry comprehensive insurance on all of our properties, including insurance for liability, fire and flood. We cannot guarantee that the limits of our current policies will be sufficient in the event of a catastrophe to our properties. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to renew or duplicate our current insurance coverage in adequate amounts or at reasonable prices. In addition, while our current insurance policies insure us against loss from terrorist acts and toxic mold, in the future, insurance companies may no longer offer coverage against these types of losses, or, if offered, these types of insurance may be prohibitively expensive. If any or all of the foregoing should occur, we may not have insurance coverage against certain types of losses and/or there may be decreases in the limits of insurance available. Should an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of our insured limits occur, we could lose all or a portion of the capital we have invested in a property or properties, as well as the anticipated future revenue from the property or properties. Nevertheless, we might remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to the property or properties. We cannot guarantee that material losses in excess of insurance proceeds will not occur in the future. If any of our properties were to experience a catastrophic loss, it could seriously disrupt our operations, delay revenue and result in large expenses to repair or rebuild the property. Such events could adversely affect our ability to make distributions or payments to our investors. If one or more of our insurance providers were to fail to pay a claim as a result of insolvency, bankruptcy or otherwise, the nonpayment of such claims could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if one or more of our insurance providers were to become subject to insolvency, bankruptcy or other proceedings and our insurance policies with the provider were terminated or canceled as a result of those proceedings, we cannot guarantee that we would be able to find alternative coverage in adequate amounts or at reasonable prices. In such case, we could experience a lapse in any or adequate insurance coverage with respect to one or more properties and be exposed to potential losses relating to any claims that may arise during such period of lapsed or inadequate coverage.
Illiquidity of real estate limits our ability to act quickly: Real estate investments are relatively illiquid. Such illiquidity may limit our ability to react quickly in response to changes in economic and other conditions. If we want to sell an investment, we might not be able to dispose of that investment in the time period we desire, and the sales price of that investment might not recoup or exceed the amount of our investment. The prohibition in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”“IRS Code”), and related regulations on a real estate investment trust holding property for sale also may restrict our ability to sell property. In addition, we acquired a significant number of our properties from individuals to whom the Operating Partnership issued Units as part of the purchase price. In connection with the acquisition of these properties, in order to preserve such individual’s income tax deferral, we contractually agreed not to sell or otherwise transfer the properties for a specified period of time, except in a manner which does not result in recognition of any built-in-gain (which may result in an income tax liability) or which reimburses the appropriate individuals for the income tax consequences of the recognition of such built-in-gains. AsThese restrictions expired in February 2016. Upon the expiration of December 31, 2015, seven of our properties, with an aggregate net book value of approximately $57.1 million, were subject to these restrictions which expire in 2016. For those properties where such restrictions have lapsed, we are generally required to use commercially reasonable efforts to prevent any sale, transfer or other disposition of the subject properties from resulting in the recognition of built-in gain to the appropriate individuals. 110After the effects of tax-free exchanges on certain of the
originally contributed properties, either wholly or partially, over time, 79 of our properties, with an aggregate net bookcarrying value of approximately $1.3$1.4 billion, have lapsed restrictions and are subject to these conditions. The above limitations on our ability to sell our investments could adversely affect our ability to make distributions or payments to our investors.
We may not be able to dispose of non-core office assets within our anticipated timeframe or at favorable prices: In connection with our three year strategic initiative announced in September 2015, we identified non-core office propertiesThe Company is currently considering that weit may sell over time properties at total estimated sales proceeds we believe will range between $600of up to $570 million and $800 million.(including its remaining flex portfolio of assets). While we intend to dispose of these properties opportunistically over time, there can be no assurance that these dispositions will be completed during the three year period of our strategic initiative. In addition, market conditions will impact our ability to dispose of these properties, and there can be no assurance that we will be successful in disposing of these properties for their estimated sales prices. A failure to dispose of these properties for their estimated market values as planned could have a material adverse effect on our ability to finance our acquisition and development plans.
New acquisitions, including acquisitions of multi-family rental real estate, may fail to perform as expected and will subject us to additional new risks: We intend to and may acquire new properties, primarily in the multi-family rental sector, assuming that we are able to obtain capital on favorable terms. Such newly acquired properties may not perform as expected and may subject us to unknown liability with respect to liabilities relating to such properties for clean-up of undisclosed environmental contamination or claims by tenants, residents, vendors or other persons against the former owners of the properties. Inaccurate assumptions regarding future rental or occupancy rates could result in overly optimistic estimates of future revenues. In addition, future operating expenses or the costs necessary to bring an acquired property up to standards established for its intended market position may be underestimated. The search for and process of acquiring such properties will also require a substantial amount of management’s time and attention. As our portfolio shifts from primarily commercial office properties to increasingly more multi-family rental properties we will face additional and new risks such as:
·
· increased competition from other housing sources such as other multi-family rental communities, condominiums and single-family houses that are available for rent as well as for sale;
· dependency on the convenience and attractiveness of the communities or neighborhoods in which our multi-family rental properties are located and the quality of local schools and other amenities;
· dependency on the financial condition of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac which provide a major source of financing to the multi-family rental sector; and
· compliance with housing and other new regulations.
Americans with Disabilities Act compliance could be costly: Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), all public accommodations and commercial facilities must meet certain federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. Compliance with the ADA requirements could involve removal of structural barriers from certain disabled persons’ entrances. Other federal, state and local laws may require modifications to or restrict further renovations of our properties with respect to such accesses. Although we believe that our properties are substantially in compliance with present requirements, noncompliance with the ADA or related laws or regulations could result in the United States government imposing fines or private litigants being awarded damages against us. Such costs may adversely affect our ability to make distributions or payments to our investors.
Environmental problems are possible and may be costly: Various federal, state and local laws and regulations subject property owners or operators to liability for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances located on or in the property. These laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator was responsible for or even knew of the presence of such substances. The presence of or failure to properly remediate hazardous or toxic substances (such as toxic mold, lead paint and asbestos) may adversely affect our ability to rent, sell or borrow against contaminated property and may impose liability upon us for personal injury to persons exposed to such substances. Various laws and regulations also impose liability on persons who arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances at another location for the costs of removal or remediation of such substances at the disposal or treatment facility. These laws often impose liability whether or not the person arranging for such disposal ever owned or operated the disposal facility. Certain other environmental laws and regulations impose liability on owners or operators of property for injuries relating to the release of asbestos-containing or other materials into the air, water or otherwise into the environment. As owners and operators of property and as potential arrangers for hazardous substance disposal, we may be liable under such laws and regulations for removal or remediation costs, governmental penalties, property damage, personal injuries and related expenses. Payment of such costs and expenses could adversely affect our ability to make distributions or payments to our investors.
We face risks associated with property acquisitions: We have acquired in the past, and our long-term strategy is to continue to pursue the acquisition of properties and portfolios of properties in New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania and in the Northeast generally, and
particularly residential properties, including large real estate portfolios that could increase our size and result in alterations to our capital structure. We may be competing for investment opportunities with entities that have greater financial resources. Several developers and real estate companies may compete with us in seeking properties for acquisition, land for development and prospective tenants. Such competition may adversely affect our ability to make distributions or payments to our investors by:
·
· increasing the bargaining power of property owners;
· interfering with our ability to attract and retain tenants;
· increasing vacancies which lowers market rental rates and limits our ability to negotiate rental rates; and/or
· adversely affecting our ability to minimize expenses of operation.
Our acquisition activities and their success are subject to the following risks:
· adequate financing to complete acquisitions may not be available on favorable terms or at all as a result of the continuing volatility in the financial and credit markets;
· even if we enter into an acquisition agreement for a property, we may be unable to complete that acquisition and risk the loss of certain non-refundable deposits and incurring certain other acquisition-related costs;
· the actual costs of repositioning or redeveloping acquired properties may be greater than our estimates;
· any acquisition agreement will likely contain conditions to closing, including completion of due diligence investigations to our satisfaction or other conditions that are not within our control, which may not be satisfied; and
· we may be unable to quickly and efficiently integrate new acquisitions, particularly acquisitions of portfolios of properties, into our existing operations, and acquired properties may fail to perform as expected; which may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Development of real estate, including the development of multi-family rental real estate could be costly: As part of our operating strategy, we may acquire land for development or construct on owned land, under certain conditions. Included among the risks of the real estate development business are the following, which may adversely affect our ability to make distributions or payments to our investors:
·
· long-term financing may not be available upon completion of construction;
· failure to complete construction and lease-up on schedule or within budget may increase debt service expense and construction and other costs; and
· failure to rent the development at all or at rent levels originally contemplated.
Property ownership through joint ventures could subject us to the contrary business objectives of our co-venturers: We, from time to time, invest in joint ventures or partnerships in which we do not hold a controlling interest in the assets underlying the entities in which we invest, including joint ventures in which (i) we own a direct interest in an entity which controls such assets, or (ii) we own a direct interest in an entity which owns indirect interests, through one or more intermediaries, of such assets. These investments involve risks that do not exist with properties in which we own a controlling interest with respect to the underlying assets, including the possibility that (i) our co-venturers or partners may, at any time, become insolvent or otherwise refuse to make capital contributions when due, (ii) we may be responsible to our co-venturers or partners for indemnifiable losses, (iii) we may become liable with respect to guarantees of payment or performance by the joint ventures, (iv) we may become subject to buy-sell arrangements which could cause us to sell our interests or acquire our co-venturer’s or partner’s interests in a joint venture, or (v) our co-venturers or partners may, at any time, have business, economic or other objectives that are inconsistent with our objectives. Because we lack a controlling interest, our co-venturers or partners may be in a position to take action contrary to our instructions or requests or contrary to our policies or objectives. While we seek protective rights against such contrary actions, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in procuring any such protective rights, or if procured, that the rights will be sufficient to fully protect us against contrary actions. Our organizational documents do not limit the amount of available funds that we may invest in joint ventures or partnerships. If the objectives of our co-venturers or partners are inconsistent with ours, it may adversely affect our ability to make distributions or payments to our investors.
Our performance is subject to risks associated with repositioning a significant portion of the Company’s portfolio from office to multi-family rental properties.
Repositioning the Company’s office portfolio may result in impairment charges or less than expected returns on office properties:There can be no assurance that the Company, as it seeks to reposition a portion of its portfolio from office to the multi-family rental sector will be able to sell office properties and purchase multi-family rental properties at prices that in the aggregate are profitable for the Company or are efficient use of its capital or that would not result in a reduction of the Company’s cash flow. Because real estate investments are relatively illiquid, it also may be difficult for the Company to promptly sell its office properties that are held or may be designated for
sale promptly or on favorable terms, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition. In addition, as the Company identifies non-core office properties that may be held for sale or that it intends to hold for a shorter period of time than previously, it may determine that the carrying value of a property is not recoverable over the anticipated holding period of the property. As a result, the Company may incur impairment charges for certain of these properties to reduce their carrying values to the estimated fair market values. See Note 3: Recent Transactions – Impairments on Properties Held and Used. Moreover, as the Company seeks to reposition a portion of its portfolio from office to the multi-family rental sector, the Company may be subject to a Federal income tax on gain from sales of properties due to limitations in the IRS Code and related regulations on a real estate investment trust’s ability to sell properties. The Company intends to structure its property dispositions in a tax-efficient manner and avoid the prohibition in the IRS Code against a real estate investment trust holding properties for sale. There is no guaranty, however, that such dispositions can be achieved without the imposition of federal income tax on any gain recognized.
Unfavorable changes in market and economic conditions could adversely affect multi-family rental occupancy, rental rates, operating expenses, and the overall market value of our assets, including joint ventures. Local conditions that may adversely affect conditions in multi-family residential markets include the following:
·: plant closings, industry slowdowns and other factors that adversely affect the local economy;
·
· a decline in household formation or employment or lack of employment growth;
· the inability or unwillingness of residents to pay rent increases;
· rent control or rent stabilization laws, or other laws regulating housing, that could prevent us from raising rents to offset increases in operating costs; and
· economic conditions that could cause an increase in our operating expenses, such as increases in property taxes, utilities, compensation of on-site associates and routine maintenance.
Changes in applicable laws, or noncompliance with applicable laws, could adversely affect our operations or expose us to liability: We must develop, construct and operate our communities in compliance with numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations, some of which may conflict with one another or be subject to limited judicial or regulatory interpretations. These laws and regulations may include zoning laws, building codes, landlord tenant laws and other laws generally applicable to business operations. Noncompliance with applicable laws could expose us to liability. Lower revenue growth or significant unanticipated expenditures may result from our need to comply with changes in (i) laws imposing remediation requirements and the potential liability for environmental conditions existing on properties or the restrictions on discharges or other conditions, (ii) rent control or rent stabilization laws or other residential landlord/tenant laws, or (iii) other governmental rules and regulations or enforcement policies affecting the development, use and operation of our communities, including changes to building codes and fire and life-safety codes.
Failure to succeed in new markets, or with new brands and community formats, or in activities other than the development, ownership and operation of residential rental communities may have adverse consequences:
We are actively engaged in development and acquisition activity in new submarkets within our core, Northeast markets where we have owned and operated our historical portfolio of office properties. Our historical experience with properties in our core, Northeast markets in developing, owning and operating properties does not ensure that we will be able to operate successfully in the new multi-family submarkets. We will be exposed to a variety of risks in the multi-family submarkets, including:·
an inability to accurately evaluate local apartment market conditions; · an inability to obtain land for development or to identify appropriate acquisition opportunities; · an acquired property may fail to perform as we expected in analyzing our investment; · our estimate of the costs of repositioning or developing an acquired property may prove inaccurate; and · lack of familiarity with local governmental and permitting procedures.
|
As we may perform fixed price construction services for third parties, we are subject to a variety of risks unique to these activities. If construction costs of a project exceed original estimates, such costs may have to be absorbed by us, thereby making the project less profitable than originally estimated, or possibly not profitable at all. In addition, a construction project may be delayed due to government or regulatory approvals, supply shortages, or other events and circumstances beyond our control, or the time required to complete a construction project may be greater than originally anticipated. If any such excess costs or project delays were to be material, such events may adversely affect our cash flow and liquidity and thereby impact our ability to make distributions or payments to our investors.
Debt financing could adversely affect our economic performance.
Scheduled debt payments and refinancing could adversely affect our financial condition: We are subject to the risks normally associated
with debt financing. These risks, including the following, may adversely affect our ability to make distributions or payments to our investors:
·
· payments of principal and interest on borrowings may leave us with insufficient cash resources to pay operating expenses;
· we may not be able to refinance indebtedness on our properties at maturity; and
· if refinanced, the terms of refinancing may not be as favorable as the original terms of the related indebtedness.
As of December 31, 2015,2018, we had total outstanding indebtedness of $2.2$2.8 billion comprised of $1.3 billion$570 million of senior unsecured notes, borrowings of $674 million under unsecured term loans, outstanding borrowings of $155$117 million under our unsecured revolving credit facility and approximately $731 million$1.4 billion of mortgages, loans payable and other obligations. We may have to refinance the principal due on our current or future indebtedness at maturity, and we may not be able to do so.
If we are unable to refinance our indebtedness on acceptable terms, or at all, events or conditions that may adversely affect our ability to make distributions or payments to our investors include the following:
· we may need to dispose of one or more of our properties upon disadvantageous terms or adjust our capital expenditures in general or with respect to our strategy of acquiring multi-family residential properties and development opportunities in particular;
· prevailing interest rates or other factors at the time of refinancing could increase interest rates and, therefore, our interest expense;
· we may be subject to an event of default pursuant to covenants for our indebtedness;
· if we mortgage property to secure payment of indebtedness and are unable to meet mortgage payments, the mortgagee could foreclose upon such property or appoint a receiver to receive an assignment of our rents and leases; and
· foreclosures upon mortgaged property could create taxable income without accompanying cash proceeds and, therefore, hinder our ability to meet the real estate investment trust distribution requirements of the IRS Code.
We are obligated to comply with financial covenants in our indebtedness that could restrict our range of operating activities: The mortgages on our properties contain customary negative covenants, including limitations on our ability, without the prior consent of the lender, to further mortgage the property, to enter into new leases outside of stipulated guidelines or to materially modify existing leases. In addition, our unsecured revolving credit facility and unsecured term loanloans each contains customary requirements, including restrictions and other limitations on our ability to incur debt, debt to assets ratios, secured debt to total assets ratios, interest coverage ratios and minimum ratios of unencumbered assets to unsecured debt. The indentures under which our senior unsecured debt have been issued contain financial and operating covenants including coverage ratios and limitations on our ability to incur secured and unsecured debt. These covenants limit our flexibility in conducting our operations and create a risk of default on our indebtedness if we cannot continue to satisfy them. Some of our debt instruments are cross-collateralized and contain cross default provisions with other debt instruments. Due to this cross-collateralization, a failure or default with respect to certain debt instruments or properties could have an adverse impact on us or our properties that are subject to the cross-collateralization under the applicable debt instrument. Failure to comply with these covenants could cause a default under the agreements and, in certain circumstances, our lenders may be entitled to accelerate our debt obligations. Defaults under our debt agreements could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Rising interest rates may adversely affect our cash flow: As of December 31, 2015,2018, outstanding borrowings of approximately $155$117 million under our unsecured revolving credit facility and approximately $137$197 million of our mortgage indebtedness bear interest at variable rates. We may incur additional indebtedness in the future that bears interest at variable rates. Variable rate debt creates higher debt service requirements if market interest rates increase. Higher debt service requirements could adversely affect our ability to make distributions or payments to our investors and/or cause us to default under certain debt covenants.
Our degree of leverage could adversely affect our cash flow: We fund acquisition opportunities and development partially through short-term borrowings (including our unsecured revolving credit facility), as well as from proceeds from property sales and undistributed cash. We expect to refinance projects purchased with short-term debt either with long-term indebtedness or equity financing depending upon the economic conditions at the time of refinancing. OurThe Board of Directors has a general policy of limiting the ratio of our indebtedness to total undepreciated assets (total debt as a percentage of total undepreciated assets) to 50 percent or less, although there is no limit in the Operating Partnership’s or our organizational documents on the amount of indebtedness that we may incur. However, we have entered into certain financial agreements which contain financial and operating covenants that limit our ability under certain circumstances to incur additional secured and unsecured indebtedness. The Board of Directors could alter or eliminate its current policy on borrowing at any time at its discretion. If this policy were changed, we could become more highly leveraged, resulting in an increase in debt service that
could adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to make distributions or payments to our investors and/or could cause an increased risk of default on our obligations.
We are dependent on external sources of capital for future growth: To qualify as a real estate investment trust under the IRS Code, wethe General Partner must distribute to ourits shareholders each year at least 90 percent of ourits net taxable income, excluding any net capital gain. Because of this distribution requirement, it is not likely that we will be able to fund all future capital needs, including for acquisitions and developments, from income from operations. Therefore, we will have to rely on third-party sources of capital, which may or may not be available on favorable terms or at all. Our access to third-party sources of capital depends on a number of things, including the market’s perception of our growth potential and our current and potential future earnings. Moreover, additional equity offerings may result in substantial dilution of our shareholders’ interests, and additional debt financing may substantially increase our leverage.
Adverse changes in our credit ratings could adversely affect our business and financial condition:
The credit ratings assigned to our senior unsecured notes by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (the “NRSROs”) are based on our operating performance, liquidity and leverage ratios, overall financial position and other factors employed by the NRSROs in their rating analyses of us. These ratings and similar ratings of us and any debt or preferred securities we may issue are subject to ongoing evaluation by the NRSROs, and we cannot assure you that any such ratings will not be changed by the NRSROs if, in their judgment, circumstances warrant. Our credit ratings can affect the amount of capital we can access, as well as the terms of any financings we may obtain. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain our current credit ratings, and in the event our current credit ratings are downgraded, we would likely incur higher borrowing costs and may encounter difficulty in obtaining additional financing.Competition for skilled personnel could increase our labor costs.
We compete with various other companies in attracting and retaining qualified and skilled personnel. We depend on our ability to attract and retain skilled management personnel who are responsible for the day-to-day operations of our company. Competitive pressures may require that we enhance our pay and benefits package to compete effectively for such personnel. We may not be able to offset such added costs by increasing the rates we charge our tenants. If there is an increase in these costs or if we fail to attract and retain qualified and skilled personnel, our business and operating results could be harmed.
We are dependent on our key personnel whose continued service is not guaranteed.
We are dependent upon key personnel for strategic business direction and real estate experience, including our chief executive officer, our president and chief operating officer, and our chief financial officer, chief investment officer, chief legal officergeneral counsel, executive vice president of leasing and chairman of Roseland.RRT. While we believe that we could find replacements for these key personnel, loss of their services could adversely affect our operations. We do not have key man life insurance for our key personnel. In addition, as the Company seeks to reposition a portion of its portfolio from office to the multi-family rental sector, the Company may become increasingly dependent on non-executive personnel with residential development and leasing expertise to effectively execute the Company’s long-term strategy.
Certain provisions of Maryland law and ourthe General Partner’s charter and bylaws could hinder, delay or prevent changes in control.
Certain provisions of Maryland law ourand General Partner’s charter and our bylaws have the effect of discouraging, delaying or preventing transactions that involve an actual or threatened change in control. These provisions include the following:
Classified Board of Directors:
Removal of Directors: Under ourthe General Partner’s charter, subject to the rights of one or more classes or series of preferred stock to elect one or more directors, a director may be removed only for cause and only by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of all votes entitled to be cast by our stockholders generally in the election of directors. Neither the Maryland General Corporation Law nor ourthe General Partner’s charter define the term “cause.” As a result, removal for “cause” is subject to Maryland common law and to judicial interpretation and review in the context of the facts and circumstances of any particular situation.
Number of Directors, Board Vacancies, Terms of Office: We have,The General Partner has, in ourits bylaws, elected to be subject to certain provisions of Maryland law which vest in the Board of Directors the exclusive right to determine the number of directors and the exclusive right, by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors, even if the remaining directors do not constitute a quorum, to fill vacancies on the board. These provisions of Maryland law, which are applicable even if other provisions of Maryland law or the charter or bylaws provide to the contrary, also provide that any director elected to fill a vacancy shall hold office for the remainder of the full term of the class of directors in which the vacancy occurred, rather than the next annual meeting of stockholders as would otherwise be the case, and until his or her successor is elected and qualifies. We have,The General Partner has, in ourits corporate governance principles, adopted a mandatory retirement age of 80 years old for directors.
Stockholder Requested Special Meetings:
Advance Notice Provisions for Stockholder Nominations and Proposals: OurThe General Partner’s bylaws require advance written notice for stockholders to nominate persons for election as directors at, or to bring other business before, any meeting of stockholders. This bylaw provision limits the ability of stockholders to make nominations of persons for election as directors or to introduce other proposals unless we are notified in a timely manner prior to the meeting.
Preferred Stock: Under ourthe General Partner’s charter, ourits Board of Directors has authority to issue preferred stock from time to time in one or more series and to establish the terms, preferences and rights of any such series of preferred stock, all without approval of ourits stockholders. As a result, ourits Board of Directors may establish a series of preferred stock that could delay or prevent a transaction or a change in control.
Duties of Directors with Respect to Unsolicited Takeovers: Maryland law provides protection for Maryland corporations against unsolicited takeovers by limiting, among other things, the duties of the directors in unsolicited takeover situations. The duties of directors of Maryland corporations do not require them to (a) accept, recommend or respond to any proposal by a person seeking to acquire control of the corporation, (b) authorize the corporation to redeem any rights under, or modify or render inapplicable, any stockholders rights plan, (c) make a determination under the Maryland Business Combination Act or the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act, or (d) act or fail to act solely because of the effect the act or failure to act may have on an acquisition or potential acquisition of control of the corporation or the amount or type of consideration that may be offered or paid to the stockholders in an acquisition. Maryland law also contains a statutory presumption that an act of a director of a Maryland corporation satisfies the applicable standards of conduct for directors under Maryland law.
Ownership Limit: In order to preserve ourthe General Partner’s status as a real estate investment trust under the IRS Code, ourits charter generally prohibits any single stockholder, or any group of affiliated stockholders, from beneficially owning more than 9.8 percent of ourits outstanding capital stock unless ourits Board of Directors waives or modifies this ownership limit.
Maryland Business Combination Act: The Maryland Business Combination Act provides that unless exempted, a Maryland corporation may not engage in certain business combinations, including mergers, consolidations, share exchanges or, in circumstances specified in the statute, asset transfers, issuances or reclassifications of shares of stock and other specified transactions, with an “interested stockholder” or an affiliate of an interested stockholder, for five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder became an interested stockholder, and thereafter unless specified criteria are met. An interested stockholder is generally a person owning or controlling, directly or indirectly, 10 percent or more of the voting power of the outstanding stock of the Maryland corporation. OurThe General Partner’s board of directors has exempted from this statute business combinations between the Company and certain affiliated individuals and entities. However, unless ourits board adopts other exemptions, the provisions of the Maryland Business Combination Act will be applicable to business combinations with other persons.
Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act:
Maryland law provides that holders of “control shares” of a corporation acquired in a “control share acquisition” shall have no voting rights with respect to the control shares except to the extent approved by a vote of two-thirds of the votes eligible to cast on the matter under the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act. “Control shares” means shares of stock that, if aggregated with all other shares of stock previously acquired by the acquirer, would entitle the acquirer to exercise voting power in electing directors within one of the following ranges of the voting power: one-tenth or more but less than one-third, one-third or more but less than a majority or a majority or more of all voting power. A “control share acquisition” means the acquisition of control shares, subject to certain exceptions.If voting rights of control shares acquired in a control share acquisition are not approved at a stockholder’s meeting, then subject to certain conditions and limitations, the issuer may redeem any or all of the control shares for fair value. If voting rights of such control
shares are approved at a stockholder’s meeting and the acquirer becomes entitled to vote a majority of the shares of stock entitled to vote, all other stockholders may exercise appraisal rights. OurIn 2018, the General Partner’s bylaws contain a provision exemptingwere amended to exempt any acquisition of the General Partner’s shares from the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act. If the General Partner’s bylaws are amended to repeal or limit the exemption from the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act, any acquisitionsit may make it more difficult for a third party to obtain control of shares by certain affiliated individualsus and entities, any directors, officers or employeesincrease the difficulty of consummating a change in control.
The enactment of significant new tax legislation, generally effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, could have a material and adverse effect on us and the market price of our shares.
On December 22, 2017, Pub. L. No. 115-97 (informally known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Reform Act”) was enacted into law. The Tax Reform Act makes significant changes to the IRS Code, including changes that impact REITs and their shareholders, among others. In particular, the Tax Reform Act reduces the maximum corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. By reducing the corporate tax rate, it is possible that the Tax Reform Act will reduce the relative attractiveness to investors (as compared with potential alternative investments) of the Company and any person approved bysingle level of taxation on REIT distributions. However, the board of directors priorTax Reform Act also made certain other changes to the acquisition by such personIRS Code are generally advantageous to REITs and their shareholder. For instance, for tax years beginning before January 1, 2026, the Tax Reform Act permits up to a 20% deduction for individuals, trusts, and estates with respect to their receipt of control shares. Any control shares acquired in a control share acquisition“qualified REIT dividends”, which are dividends from a REIT that are not exempt undercapital gain dividends and are not qualified dividend income. These changes generally result in an effective maximum U.S. federal income tax rate on such dividends of 29.6%, if the foregoingdeduction is allowed in full. The full ramifications of the Tax Reform Act remain unclear and will likely remain unclear until further Treasury guidance is issued. Key provisions of the Tax Reform Act that could impact us and the market price of our bylawsshares include:
· temporarily reducing individual U.S. federal income tax rates on ordinary income; the highest individual U.S. federal income tax rate was reduced from 39.6% to 37% (through tax years beginning before January 1, 2026);
· eliminating miscellaneous itemized deductions and limiting state and local tax deductions;
· reducing the maximum corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, which reduces, but does not eliminate, the competitive advantage that REITs enjoy relative to non-REIT corporations;
· permitting individuals, trusts, and estates (subject to certain limitations) to deduct up to 20% of certain pass-through business income, including, as noted above, dividends received by our shareholders that are not designated by us as capital gain dividends or qualified dividend income, which will generally result in an effective maximum U.S. federal income tax rate of 29.6% on such dividends, if the deduction is allowed in full (through tax years beginning before January 1, 2026);
· reducing the highest rate of withholding with respect to our distributions to non-U.S. shareholders that are treated as attributable to gains from the sale or exchange of U.S. real property interests from 35% to 21%;
· limiting our deduction for net operating losses incurred after December 31, 2017 to 80% of taxable income (prior to the application of the dividends paid deduction), where taxable income is determined without regarding to the net operating loss deduction itself, and generally eliminating net operating loss carrybacks and allowing unused net operating losses to be carried forward indefinitely;
· creating a new limitation on the deduction of net interest expense for all businesses other than certain real estate businesses that make an election to not be subject to such limitation This provision could have the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act.
· expanding the ability of businesses to deduct the cost of certain purchases of property in the year in which such property is purchased; and
· eliminating the corporate alternative minimum tax.
In addition to the foregoing, the Tax Reform Act may impact our tenants, the real estate market, and the overall economy, which may have an effect on us. It is not possible to state with certainty at this time the effect of the Tax Reform Act on us and on an investment in our shares.
Consequences of the General Partner’s failure to qualify as a real estate investment trust could adversely affect our financial condition.
Failure to maintain ownership limits could cause usthe General Partner to lose ourits qualification as a real estate investment trust: In order for usthe General Partner to maintain ourits qualification as a real estate investment trust under the IRS Code, not more than 50 percent in value of ourits outstanding stock may be actually and/or constructively owned by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the IRS Code to include certain entities). We haveThe General Partner has limited the ownership of ourits outstanding shares of our common stock by any single stockholder to 9.8 percent of the outstanding shares of ourits common stock. OurIts Board of Directors could waive this restriction if they wereit was satisfied, based upon the advice of tax counsel or otherwise, that such action would be in ourthe best interests of the General Partner and
its stockholders and would not affect ourits qualification as a real estate investment trust under the IRS Code. Common stock acquired or transferred in breach of the limitation may be redeemed by us for the lesser of the price paid and the average closing price for the 10 trading days immediately preceding redemption or sold at the direction of us. Wethe General Partner. The General Partner may elect to redeem such shares of common stock for Units, which are nontransferable except in very limited circumstances. Any transfer of shares of common stock which, as a result of such transfer, causes usthe General Partner to be in violation of any ownership limit, will be deemed void. Although wethe General Partner currently intendintends to continue to operate in a manner which will enable usit to continue to qualify as a real estate investment trust under the IRS Code, it is possible that future economic, market, legal, tax or other considerations may cause ourits Board of Directors to revoke the election for usthe General Partner’s to qualify as a real estate investment trust. Under ourthe General Partner’s organizational documents, ourits Board of Directors can make such revocation without the consent of ourits stockholders.
In addition, the consent of the holders of at least 85 percent of the Operating Partnership’s partnership units is required: (i) to merge (or permit the merger of) usthe Operating Partnership with another unrelated person, pursuant to a transaction in which the Operating Partnership is not the surviving entity; (ii) to dissolve, liquidate or wind up the Operating Partnership; or (iii) to convey or otherwise transfer all or substantially all of the Operating Partnership’s assets. As of February 22, 2016, as general partner, we own15, 2019, the General Partner, owns approximately 89.589.8 percent of the Operating Partnership’s outstanding common partnership units.
Tax liabilities as a consequence of failure to qualify as a real estate investment trust: We haveThe General Partner has elected to be treated and havehas operated so as to qualify as a real estate investment trust for federal income tax purposes since ourthe General Partner’s taxable year ended December 31, 1994. Although we believe wethe General Partner believes it will continue to operate in such manner, weit cannot guarantee that weit will do so. Qualification as a real estate investment trust involves the satisfaction of various requirements (some on an annual and some on a quarterly basis) established under highly technical and complex tax provisions of the IRS Code. Because few judicial or administrative interpretations of such provisions exist and qualification determinations are fact sensitive, wethe General Partner cannot assure you that weit will qualify as a real estate investment trust for any taxable year.
If we failthe General Partner fails to qualify as a real estate investment trust in any taxable year, weit will be subject to the following:
· it will not be allowed a deduction for dividends paid to shareholders;
· it will be subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates, including any alternative minimum tax, if applicable; and
· unless it is entitled to relief under certain statutory provisions, it will not be permitted to qualify as a real estate investment trust for the four taxable years following the year during which was disqualified.
A loss of ourthe General Partner’s status as a real estate investment trust could have an adverse effect on us. Failure to qualify as a real estate investment trust also would eliminate the requirement that wethe General Partner pay dividends to ourits stockholders.
Other tax liabilities: Even if we qualifythe General Partner qualifies as a real estate investment trust under the IRS Code, we areits subject to certain federal, state and local taxes on our income and property and, in some circumstances, certain other state and local taxes. From time to time changes in state and local tax laws or regulations are enacted, which may result in an increase in our tax liability. A shortfall in tax revenues for states and municipalities in which we operate may lead to an increase in the frequency and amount of such increase. These actions could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, our taxable REIT subsidiaries will be subject to federal, state and local income tax for income received in connection with certain non-customary services performed for tenants and/or third parties.
Risk of changes in the tax law applicable to real estate investment trusts:
Since the Internal Revenue Service, the United States Treasury Department and Congress frequently review federal income tax legislation, we cannot predict whether, when or to what extent new federal tax laws, regulations, interpretations or rulings will be adopted. Any such legislative action may prospectively or retroactively modify ourSecurity breaches and other disruptions could compromise our information and expose us to liability, which would cause our business and reputation to suffer.
In the ordinary course of our business, we collect and store sensitive data, including intellectual property, our proprietary business information and that of our tenants and business partners, including personally identifiable information of our tenants and employees, in our data centers and on our networks. Despite our security measures, our information technology and infrastructure may be vulnerable to attacks by hackers or breached due to employee error, malfeasance or other disruptions. Any such breach could compromise our networks and the information stored there could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen. Any such access, disclosure or other loss of information could result in legal claims or proceedings, liability under laws that protect the privacy of personal information, disrupt our operations, and damage our reputation, which could adversely affect our business.
We cannot predict with certainty whether climate change is occurring and, if so, at what rate. However, the physical effects of climate change could have a material adverse effect on our properties, operations and business. For example, many of our properties are located along the East coast, particularly those in New Jersey, New York and Connecticut. To the extent climate change causes changes in weather patterns, our markets could experience increases in storm intensity and rising sea-levels. Over time, these conditions could result in declining demand for office space in our buildings or the inability of us to operate the buildings at all. Climate change may also have indirect effects on our business by increasing the cost of (or making unavailable) property insurance on terms we find acceptable, increasing the cost of energy and increasing the cost of snow removal or related costs at our properties. Proposed legislation to address climate change could increase utility and other costs of operating our properties which, if not offset by rising rental income, would reduce our net income. There can be no assurance that climate change will not have a material adverse effect on our properties, operations or business.
Changes in market conditions could adversely affect the market price of ourthe General Partner’s common stock.
As with other publicly traded equity securities, the value of ourthe General Partner’s common stock depends on various market conditions, which may change from time to time. The market price of ourthe General Partner’s common stock could change in ways that may or may not be related to our business, ourthe General Partner’s industry or our operating performance and financial condition. Among the market conditions that may affect the value of ourthe General Partner’s common stock are the following:
· the extent of your interest in us;
· the general reputation of REITs and the attractiveness of the General Partner’s equity securities in comparison to other equity securities, including securities issued by other real estate-based companies;
· our financial performance; and
· general stock and bond market conditions.
The market value of ourthe General Partner’s common stock is based primarily upon the market’s perception of our growth potential and our current and potential future earnings and cash dividends. Consequently, ourthe General Partner’s common stock may trade at prices that are higher or lower than ourits net asset value per share of common stock.
ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
As of December 31, 2015,2018, the Company’s Consolidated Properties consisted of 217104 in-service commercial office and flex properties, as well as six16 multi-family properties. The Consolidated Properties are located primarily in the Northeast. The Consolidated Properties are easily accessible from major thoroughfares and are in close proximity to numerous amenities. The Consolidated Properties contain a total of approximately 24.214.9 million square feet of commercial space and 1,301 apartments3,988 apartment units with the individual commercial properties ranging from 6,216 to 1,246,283 square feet. The Consolidated Properties, managed by on-site employees, generally have attractively landscaped sites and atriums in addition to quality design and construction. The Company’s commercial tenants include many service sector employers, including a large number of professional firms and national and international businesses. The Company believes that all of its properties are well-maintained and do not require significant capital improvements.
| Office Properties | ||||||||
| Percentage | 2015 | 2015 | 2015 | |||||
| Net | Leased | Base | Average | Average | ||||
| Rentable | as of | Rent | Percentage | Base Rent | Effective Rent | |||
| Year | Area | 12/31/15 | ($000’s) | of Total 2015 | Per Sq. Ft. | Per Sq. Ft. | ||
| Property Location | Built | (Sq. Ft.) | (%) (a) | (b) (c) | Base Rent (%) | ($) (c) (d) | ($) (c) (e) | |
| NEW JERSEY | ||||||||
| BERGEN COUNTY | ||||||||
| Fort Lee | ||||||||
| One Bridge Plaza | 1981 | 200,000 | 92.2 | 4,642 | 0.97 | 25.17 | 22.30 | |
| 2115 Linwood Avenue | 1981 | 68,000 | 98.2 | 1,171 | 0.24 | 17.54 | 13.93 | |
| Montvale | ||||||||
| 135 Chestnut Ridge Road | 1981 | 66,150 | 66.6 | 922 | 0.19 | 20.93 | 18.09 | |
| Paramus | ||||||||
| 15 East Midland Avenue | 1988 | 259,823 | 53.6 | 3,105 | 0.65 | 22.30 | 18.65 | |
| 140 East Ridgewood Avenue | 1981 | 239,680 | 100.0 | 4,116 | 0.86 | 17.17 | 13.81 | |
| 461 From Road | 1988 | 253,554 | 98.1 | 4,210 | 0.88 | 16.93 | 13.94 | |
| 650 From Road | 1978 | 348,510 | 79.4 | 6,102 | 1.27 | 22.05 | 18.26 | |
| 61 South Paramus Road (f) | 1985 | 269,191 | 81.7 | 4,171 | 0.87 | 18.97 | 16.36 | |
| Rochelle Park | ||||||||
| 120 West Passaic Street | 1972 | 52,000 | 46.2 | 709 | 0.15 | 29.51 | 27.76 | |
| 365 West Passaic Street | 1976 | 212,578 | 82.9 | 3,535 | 0.74 | 20.06 | 17.89 | |
| 395 West Passaic Street | 1979 | 100,589 | 75.6 | 1,376 | 0.29 | 18.09 | 15.27 | |
| Upper Saddle River | ||||||||
| 10 Mountainview Road | 1986 | 192,000 | 63.6 | 2,954 | 0.62 | 24.19 | 20.55 | |
| Woodcliff Lake | ||||||||
| 400 Chestnut Ridge Road | 1982 | 89,200 | 100.0 | 2,142 | 0.45 | 24.01 | 21.04 | |
| 50 Tice Boulevard | 1984 | 235,000 | 95.6 | 5,544 | 1.16 | 24.68 | 21.30 | |
| 300 Tice Boulevard | 1991 | 230,000 | 95.4 | 6,069 | 1.27 | 27.66 | 24.90 | |
| ESSEX COUNTY | ||||||||
| Millburn | ||||||||
| 150 J.F. Kennedy Parkway | 1980 | 247,476 | 97.2 | 4,758 | 0.99 | 19.78 | 16.07 | |
| Borough of Roseland | ||||||||
| 4 Becker Farm Road | 1983 | 281,762 | 94.9 | 6,975 | 1.45 | 26.09 | 24.97 | |
| 6 Becker Farm Road | 1982 | 129,732 | 77.5 | 2,567 | 0.54 | 25.53 | 24.36 | |
| 101 Eisenhower Parkway | 1980 | 237,000 | 80.6 | 4,394 | 0.92 | 23.00 | 18.86 | |
| 103 Eisenhower Parkway | 1985 | 151,545 | 77.7 | 2,402 | 0.50 | 20.40 | 16.23 | |
| 105 Eisenhower Parkway | 2001 | 220,000 | 38.1 | 2,065 | 0.43 | 24.64 | 18.47 | |
| 75 Livingston Avenue | 1985 | 94,221 | 64.2 | 1,253 | 0.26 | 20.71 | 18.47 | |
| 85 Livingston Avenue | 1985 | 124,595 | 81.8 | 2,462 | 0.51 | 24.16 | 22.06 | |
| HUDSON COUNTY | ||||||||
| Jersey City | ||||||||
| Harborside Plaza 1 | 1983 | 400,000 | 100.0 | 11,331 | 2.36 | 28.33 | 24.67 | |
| Harborside Plaza 2 | 1990 | 761,200 | 58.1 | 11,281 | 2.35 | 25.51 | 21.29 | |
| Harborside Plaza 3 | 1990 | 725,600 | 83.5 | 19,650 | 4.10 | 32.43 | 29.50 | |
| Harborside Plaza 4-A | 2000 | 207,670 | 98.6 | 6,546 | 1.36 | 31.97 | 24.72 | |
| Harborside Plaza 5 | 2002 | 977,225 | 99.0 | 32,442 | 6.77 | 33.53 | 29.63 | |
| 101 Hudson Street | 1992 | 1,246,283 | 90.2 | 29,668 | 6.19 | 26.39 | 23.29 | |
Office Properties
|
|
|
|
|
| Percentage |
| 2018 |
|
|
| 2018 |
| 2018 |
|
|
|
|
| Net |
| Leased |
| Base |
|
|
| Average |
| Average |
|
|
|
|
| Rentable |
| as of |
| Rent |
| Percentage |
| Base Rent |
| Effective Rent |
|
|
| Year |
| Area |
| 12/31/18 |
| ($000’s) |
| of Total 2018 |
| Per Sq. Ft. |
| Per Sq. Ft. |
|
Property Location |
| Built |
| (Sq. Ft.) |
| (%) (a) |
| (b) (c) |
| Base Rent (%) |
| ($) (c) (d) |
| ($) (c) (e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEW JERSEY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BERGEN COUNTY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fort Lee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Bridge Plaza |
| 1981 |
| 200,000 |
| 76.8 | % | 4,712 |
| 1.12 |
| 30.67 |
| 27.85 |
|
2115 Linwood Avenue (i) |
| 1981 |
| 68,000 |
| 86.1 | % | 1,481 |
| 0.35 |
| 25.29 |
| 20.34 |
|
Paramus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
650 From Road (h) |
| 1978 |
| 348,510 |
| 68.4 | % | 5,979 |
| 1.42 |
| 25.07 |
| 22.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ESSEX COUNTY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short Hills |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150 J.F. Kennedy Parkway |
| 1980 |
| 247,476 |
| 84.2 | % | 7,207 |
| 1.71 |
| 34.60 |
| 27.91 |
|
51 J.F. Kennedy Parkway |
| 1988 |
| 260,741 |
| 98.3 | % | 13,350 |
| 3.16 |
| 52.08 |
| 46.91 |
|
101 J.F. Kennedy Parkway |
| 1981 |
| 197,196 |
| 98.4 | % | 8,591 |
| 2.03 |
| 44.26 |
| 40.34 |
|
103 J.F. Kennedy Parkway |
| 1981 |
| 123,000 |
| 100.0 | % | 5,106 |
| 1.21 |
| 41.51 |
| 36.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HUDSON COUNTY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hoboken |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111 River Street |
| 2002 |
| 566,215 |
| 77.1 | % | 21,204 |
| 5.02 |
| 48.57 |
| 45.47 |
|
Jersey City |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harborside Plaza 1 |
| 1983 |
| 400,000 |
| 48.6 | % | 7,032 |
| 1.67 |
| 36.17 |
| 31.47 |
|
Harborside Plaza 2 |
| 1990 |
| 761,200 |
| 80.7 | % | 18,398 |
| 4.36 |
| 29.95 |
| 24.84 |
|
Harborside Plaza 3 (c) |
| 1990 |
| 725,600 |
| 85.4 | % | 21,012 |
| 4.98 |
| 33.91 |
| 29.08 |
|
Harborside Plaza 4-A |
| 2000 |
| 207,670 |
| 95.6 | % | 6,419 |
| 1.52 |
| 32.34 |
| 26.17 |
|
Harborside Plaza 5 |
| 2002 |
| 977,225 |
| 57.0 | % | 24,614 |
| 5.83 |
| 44.19 |
| 37.72 |
|
101 Hudson Street |
| 1992 |
| 1,246,283 |
| 76.8 | % | 32,977 |
| 7.81 |
| 34.45 |
| 27.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MERCER COUNTY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Princeton |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 Overlook Center |
| 1988 |
| 149,600 |
| 95.4 | % | 2,572 |
| 0.61 |
| 18.02 |
| 15.86 |
|
5 Vaughn Drive |
| 1987 |
| 98,500 |
| 44.0 | % | 1,224 |
| 0.29 |
| 28.26 |
| 23.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MIDDLESEX COUNTY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edison |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
333 Thornall Street |
| 1984 |
| 196,128 |
| 100.0 | % | 5,396 |
| 1.28 |
| 27.51 |
| 23.13 |
|
343 Thornall Street |
| 1991 |
| 195,709 |
| 95.5 | % | 6,278 |
| 1.49 |
| 33.58 |
| 28.97 |
|
Iselin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 Wood Avenue South |
| 1990 |
| 262,841 |
| 100.0 | % | 9,214 |
| 2.18 |
| 35.06 |
| 31.31 |
|
Plainsboro |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 College Road East (f)(h) |
| 1984 |
| 158,235 |
| 72.6 | % | 2,871 |
| 0.68 |
| 24.99 |
| 20.62 |
|
Woodbridge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
581 Main Street |
| 1991 |
| 200,000 |
| 99.0 | % | 2,792 |
| 0.66 |
| 14.10 |
| 9.44 |
|
Office Properties
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
| Percentage |
| 2018 |
|
|
| 2018 |
| 2018 |
|
|
|
|
| Net |
| Leased |
| Base |
|
|
| Average |
| Average |
|
|
|
|
| Rentable |
| as of |
| Rent |
| Percentage |
| Base Rent |
| Effective Rent |
|
|
| Year |
| Area |
| 12/31/18 |
| ($000’s) |
| of Total 2018 |
| Per Sq. Ft. |
| Per Sq. Ft. |
|
Property Location |
| Built |
| (Sq. Ft.) |
| (%) (a) |
| (b) (c) |
| Base Rent (%) |
| ($) (c) (d) |
| ($) (c) (e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MONMOUTH COUNTY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holmdel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 Main Street |
| 1977 |
| 350,000 |
| 100.0 | % | 4,566 |
| 1.08 |
| 13.05 |
| 10.33 |
|
Middletown |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One River Centre Bldg 1 |
| 1983 |
| 122,594 |
| 97.6 | % | 3,049 |
| 0.72 |
| 25.49 |
| 22.50 |
|
One River Centre Bldg 2 |
| 1983 |
| 120,360 |
| 100.0 | % | 3,017 |
| 0.71 |
| 25.07 |
| 21.19 |
|
One River Centre Bldg 3 |
| 1984 |
| 194,518 |
| 37.7 | % | 2,317 |
| 0.55 |
| 31.58 |
| 27.41 |
|
Neptune |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3600 Route 66 |
| 1989 |
| 180,000 |
| 100.0 | % | 4,364 |
| 1.03 |
| 24.24 |
| 18.82 |
|
Red Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 Schultz Drive |
| 1988 |
| 102,018 |
| 71.7 | % | 1,685 |
| 0.40 |
| 23.05 |
| 18.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MORRIS COUNTY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florham Park |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325 Columbia Turnpike |
| 1987 |
| 168,144 |
| 100.0 | % | 4,157 |
| 0.98 |
| 24.72 |
| 21.21 |
|
Madison |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Giralda Farms |
| 1982 |
| 154,417 |
| 97.0 | % | 4,942 |
| 1.17 |
| 33.00 |
| 29.12 |
|
7 Giralda Farms |
| 1997 |
| 236,674 |
| 60.1 | % | 4,509 |
| 1.07 |
| 31.72 |
| 27.35 |
|
Morris Plains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201 Littleton Road (h) |
| 1979 |
| 88,369 |
| 37.5 | % | 711 |
| 0.17 |
| 21.47 |
| 18.03 |
|
Parsippany |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 Campus Drive |
| 1983 |
| 147,475 |
| 83.0 | % | 2,535 |
| 0.60 |
| 20.72 |
| 15.84 |
|
6 Campus Drive |
| 1983 |
| 148,291 |
| 84.7 | % | 2,796 |
| 0.66 |
| 22.27 |
| 18.59 |
|
7 Campus Drive |
| 1982 |
| 154,395 |
| 86.8 | % | 2,949 |
| 0.70 |
| 22.00 |
| 18.91 |
|
8 Campus Drive |
| 1987 |
| 215,265 |
| 72.3 | % | 4,317 |
| 1.02 |
| 27.75 |
| 20.63 |
|
9 Campus Drive |
| 1983 |
| 156,495 |
| 90.7 | % | 2,735 |
| 0.65 |
| 19.27 |
| 15.07 |
|
2 Dryden Way |
| 1990 |
| 6,216 |
| 100.0 | % | 99 |
| 0.02 |
| 15.93 |
| 14.64 |
|
4 Gatehall Drive |
| 1988 |
| 248,480 |
| 72.3 | % | 4,928 |
| 1.17 |
| 27.42 |
| 23.36 |
|
2 Hilton Court |
| 1991 |
| 181,592 |
| 100.0 | % | 6,523 |
| 1.55 |
| 35.92 |
| 32.83 |
|
1 Sylvan Way |
| 1989 |
| 150,557 |
| 81.7 | % | 3,623 |
| 0.86 |
| 29.47 |
| 26.56 |
|
3 Sylvan Way (g) |
| 2018 |
| 147,241 |
| 55.7 | % | 1,576 |
| 0.37 |
| 28.62 |
| 23.97 |
|
5 Sylvan Way |
| 1989 |
| 151,383 |
| 94.2 | % | 3,699 |
| 0.88 |
| 25.94 |
| 22.72 |
|
7 Sylvan Way (c) |
| 1987 |
| 145,983 |
| 70.8 | % | 1,418 |
| 0.34 |
| 13.73 |
| 10.55 |
|
5 Wood Hollow Road |
| 1979 |
| 317,040 |
| 100.0 | % | 6,486 |
| 1.54 |
| 20.46 |
| 15.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SOMERSET COUNTY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bridgewater |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
721 Route 202/206 (i) |
| 1989 |
| 192,741 |
| 0.0 | % | 258 |
| 0.06 |
| 0.00 |
| 0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total New Jersey Office |
|
|
| 11,670,377 |
| 78.7 | %(l) | 285,688 |
| 67.68 |
| 31.21 |
| 26.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEW YORK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WESTCHESTER COUNTY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elmsford |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 Clearbrook Road (c) |
| 1975 |
| 60,000 |
| 84.9 | % | 928 |
| 0.22 |
| 18.22 |
| 16.86 |
|
Hawthorne |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Skyline Drive |
| 1980 |
| 20,400 |
| 99.0 | % | 409 |
| 0.10 |
| 20.25 |
| 19.16 |
|
2 Skyline Drive |
| 1987 |
| 30,000 |
| 100.0 | % | 542 |
| 0.13 |
| 18.07 |
| 13.80 |
|
7 Skyline Drive |
| 1987 |
| 109,000 |
| 94.8 | % | 2,389 |
| 0.56 |
| 23.13 |
| 20.23 |
|
17 Skyline Drive (f) |
| 1989 |
| 85,000 |
| 100.0 | % | 1,934 |
| 0.46 |
| 22.75 |
| 22.58 |
|
Yonkers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Executive Boulevard |
| 1982 |
| 112,000 |
| 78.7 | % | 2,190 |
| 0.52 |
| 24.84 |
| 22.59 |
|
3 Executive Boulevard |
| 1987 |
| 58,000 |
| 93.1 | % | 1,678 |
| 0.40 |
| 31.09 |
| 28.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total New York Office |
|
|
| 474,400 |
| 91.0 | %(l) | 10,070 |
| 2.39 |
| 23.33 |
| 21.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL OFFICE PROPERTIES |
|
|
| 12,144,777 |
| 79.1 | %(l) | 295,758 |
| 70.07 |
| 30.86 |
| 26.35 |
|
Office/Flex Properties
|
|
|
|
|
| Percentage |
| 2018 |
|
|
| 2018 |
| 2018 |
|
|
|
|
| Net |
| Leased |
| Base |
|
|
| Average |
| Average |
|
|
|
|
| Rentable |
| as of |
| Rent |
| Percentage |
| Base Rent |
| Effective Rent |
|
|
| Year |
| Area |
| 12/31/18 |
| ($000’s) |
| of Total 2018 |
| Per Sq. Ft. |
| Per Sq. Ft. |
|
Property Location |
| Built |
| (Sq. Ft.) |
| (%) (a) |
| (b) (c) |
| Base Rent (%) |
| ($) (c) (d) |
| ($) (c) (e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEW YORK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WESTCHESTER COUNTY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elmsford |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 Clearbrook Road |
| 1974 |
| 31,800 |
| 100.0 | % | 553 |
| 0.13 |
| 17.39 |
| 16.29 |
|
75 Clearbrook Road |
| 1990 |
| 32,720 |
| 100.0 | % | 466 |
| 0.11 |
| 14.24 |
| 14.24 |
|
125 Clearbrook Road |
| 2002 |
| 33,000 |
| 100.0 | % | 634 |
| 0.15 |
| 19.21 |
| 14.64 |
|
150 Clearbrook Road |
| 1975 |
| 74,900 |
| 100.0 | % | 1,145 |
| 0.27 |
| 15.29 |
| 13.79 |
|
175 Clearbrook Road |
| 1973 |
| 98,900 |
| 96.7 | % | 1,532 |
| 0.36 |
| 16.02 |
| 14.47 |
|
200 Clearbrook Road |
| 1974 |
| 94,000 |
| 99.8 | % | 1,321 |
| 0.31 |
| 14.07 |
| 12.90 |
|
250 Clearbrook Road |
| 1973 |
| 155,000 |
| 97.1 | % | 1,565 |
| 0.37 |
| 10.40 |
| 9.02 |
|
50 Executive Boulevard |
| 1969 |
| 45,200 |
| 28.9 | % | 140 |
| 0.03 |
| 10.70 |
| 7.95 |
|
77 Executive Boulevard |
| 1977 |
| 13,000 |
| 100.0 | % | 263 |
| 0.06 |
| 20.23 |
| 19.08 |
|
85 Executive Boulevard |
| 1968 |
| 31,000 |
| 81.2 | % | 148 |
| 0.04 |
| 5.88 |
| 4.25 |
|
101 Executive Boulevard (g) |
| 2018 |
| 35,000 |
| 100.0 | % | 535 |
| 0.13 |
| 16.70 |
| 15.74 |
|
300 Executive Boulevard |
| 1970 |
| 60,000 |
| 100.0 | % | 790 |
| 0.19 |
| 13.17 |
| 12.47 |
|
350 Executive Boulevard |
| 1970 |
| 15,400 |
| 99.4 | % | 247 |
| 0.06 |
| 16.14 |
| 14.57 |
|
399 Executive Boulevard |
| 1962 |
| 80,000 |
| 100.0 | % | 1,172 |
| 0.28 |
| 14.65 |
| 14.08 |
|
400 Executive Boulevard |
| 1970 |
| 42,200 |
| 100.0 | % | 824 |
| 0.20 |
| 19.53 |
| 16.37 |
|
500 Executive Boulevard |
| 1970 |
| 41,600 |
| 100.0 | % | 756 |
| 0.18 |
| 18.17 |
| 16.39 |
|
525 Executive Boulevard |
| 1972 |
| 61,700 |
| 97.9 | % | 1,133 |
| 0.27 |
| 18.76 |
| 17.09 |
|
1 Westchester Plaza |
| 1967 |
| 25,000 |
| 100.0 | % | 419 |
| 0.10 |
| 16.76 |
| 16.40 |
|
2 Westchester Plaza |
| 1968 |
| 25,000 |
| 96.1 | % | 391 |
| 0.09 |
| 16.28 |
| 12.78 |
|
3 Westchester Plaza |
| 1969 |
| 93,500 |
| 100.0 | % | 1,614 |
| 0.38 |
| 17.26 |
| 15.14 |
|
4 Westchester Plaza |
| 1969 |
| 44,700 |
| 100.0 | % | 696 |
| 0.16 |
| 15.57 |
| 13.29 |
|
5 Westchester Plaza |
| 1969 |
| 20,000 |
| 90.4 | % | 322 |
| 0.08 |
| 17.80 |
| 14.32 |
|
6 Westchester Plaza |
| 1968 |
| 20,000 |
| 100.0 | % | 314 |
| 0.07 |
| 15.70 |
| 14.10 |
|
7 Westchester Plaza |
| 1972 |
| 46,200 |
| 100.0 | % | 806 |
| 0.19 |
| 17.45 |
| 15.45 |
|
8 Westchester Plaza |
| 1971 |
| 67,200 |
| 96.6 | % | 1,200 |
| 0.29 |
| 18.48 |
| 15.35 |
|
Hawthorne |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 Saw Mill River Road |
| 1965 |
| 51,100 |
| 100.0 | % | 775 |
| 0.18 |
| 15.17 |
| 13.62 |
|
4 Skyline Drive |
| 1987 |
| 80,600 |
| 95.4 | % | 1,332 |
| 0.32 |
| 17.32 |
| 14.81 |
|
5 Skyline Drive |
| 1980 |
| 124,022 |
| 97.9 | % | 1,826 |
| 0.43 |
| 15.04 |
| 11.09 |
|
6 Skyline Drive |
| 1980 |
| 44,155 |
| 100.0 | % | 797 |
| 0.19 |
| 18.05 |
| 14.56 |
|
8 Skyline Drive |
| 1985 |
| 50,000 |
| 48.1 | % | 183 |
| 0.04 |
| 7.61 |
| 6.36 |
|
10 Skyline Drive |
| 1985 |
| 20,000 |
| 68.5 | % | 331 |
| 0.08 |
| 24.16 |
| 22.48 |
|
11 Skyline Drive (f) |
| 1989 |
| 45,000 |
| 100.0 | % | 1,001 |
| 0.24 |
| 22.24 |
| 21.42 |
|
12 Skyline Drive (f) |
| 1999 |
| 46,850 |
| 70.1 | % | 623 |
| 0.15 |
| 18.96 |
| 17.29 |
|
15 Skyline Drive (f) |
| 1989 |
| 55,000 |
| 86.6 | % | 881 |
| 0.21 |
| 18.49 |
| 16.35 |
|
Yonkers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 Corporate Boulevard |
| 1987 |
| 78,000 |
| 98.3 | % | 1,956 |
| 0.46 |
| 25.51 |
| 24.37 |
|
200 Corporate Boulevard South |
| 1990 |
| 84,000 |
| 86.0 | % | 1,572 |
| 0.37 |
| 21.76 |
| 18.88 |
|
4 Executive Plaza |
| 1986 |
| 80,000 |
| 93.9 | % | 1,744 |
| 0.41 |
| 23.22 |
| 21.48 |
|
6 Executive Plaza |
| 1987 |
| 80,000 |
| 100.0 | % | 1,861 |
| 0.44 |
| 23.26 |
| 21.54 |
|
1 Odell Plaza |
| 1980 |
| 106,000 |
| 94.3 | % | 1,660 |
| 0.40 |
| 16.60 |
| 14.78 |
|
3 Odell Plaza |
| 1984 |
| 71,065 |
| 100.0 | % | 2,198 |
| 0.52 |
| 30.93 |
| 28.66 |
|
5 Odell Plaza |
| 1983 |
| 38,400 |
| 99.6 | % | 641 |
| 0.15 |
| 16.75 |
| 15.42 |
|
7 Odell Plaza |
| 1984 |
| 42,600 |
| 100.0 | % | 756 |
| 0.18 |
| 17.75 |
| 15.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total New York Office/Flex |
|
|
| 2,383,812 |
| 94.3 | % | 39,123 |
| 9.27 |
| 17.43 |
| 15.52 |
|
Office/Flex Properties (continued)
and Retail Properties, and Land Leases
|
|
|
|
|
| Percentage |
| 2018 |
|
|
| 2018 |
| 2018 |
|
|
|
|
| Net |
| Leased |
| Base |
|
|
| Average |
| Average |
|
|
|
|
| Rentable |
| as of |
| Rent |
| Percentage |
| Base Rent |
| Effective Rent |
|
|
| Year |
| Area |
| 12/31/18 |
| ($000’s) |
| of Total 2018 |
| Per Sq. Ft. |
| Per Sq. Ft. |
|
Property Location |
| Built |
| (Sq. Ft.) |
| (%) (a) |
| (b) (c) |
| Base Rent (%) |
| ($) (c) (d) |
| ($) (c) (e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONNECTICUT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAIRFIELD COUNTY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stamford |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
419 West Avenue |
| 1986 |
| 88,000 |
| 100.0 | % | 1,669 |
| 0.40 |
| 18.97 |
| 17.34 |
|
500 West Avenue |
| 1988 |
| 25,000 |
| 100.0 | % | 494 |
| 0.12 |
| 19.76 |
| 15.84 |
|
550 West Avenue |
| 1990 |
| 54,000 |
| 13.0 | % | 61 |
| 0.01 |
| 8.71 |
| 8.71 |
|
600 West Avenue |
| 1999 |
| 66,000 |
| 100.0 | % | 1,012 |
| 0.24 |
| 15.33 |
| 13.95 |
|
650 West Avenue |
| 1998 |
| 40,000 |
| 100.0 | % | 725 |
| 0.17 |
| 18.13 |
| 12.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Connecticut Office/Flex |
|
|
| 273,000 |
| 82.8 | % | 3,961 |
| 0.94 |
| 17.53 |
| 15.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL OFFICE/FLEX PROPERTIES |
|
|
| 2,656,812 |
| 93.1 | % | 43,084 |
| 10.21 |
| 17.44 |
| 15.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEW JERSEY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HUDSON COUNTY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weehawken |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 Avenue at Port Imperial |
| 2016 |
| 8,400 |
| 100.0 | % | 299 |
| 0.07 |
| 35.60 |
| 34.29 |
|
500 Avenue at Port Imperial |
| 2013 |
| 16,736 |
| 98.2 | % | 438 |
| 0.10 |
| 26.66 |
| 23.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total New Jersey Retail Properties |
|
|
| 25,136 |
| 98.8 | % | 737 |
| 0.17 |
| 29.68 |
| 27.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEW YORK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WESTCHESTER COUNTY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tarrytown |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230 White Plains Road (h) |
| 1984 |
| 9,300 |
| 100.0 | % | 335 |
| 0.08 |
| 36.02 |
| 33.66 |
|
Yonkers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 Executive Boulevard |
| 1986 |
| 8,000 |
| 100.0 | % | 305 |
| 0.07 |
| 38.13 |
| 37.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total New York Retail Properties |
|
|
| 17,300 |
| 100.0 | %(l) | 640 |
| 0.15 |
| 36.99 |
| 35.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Retail Properties |
|
|
| 42,436 |
| 99.3 | % | 1,377 |
| 0.32 |
| 32.68 |
| 30.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEW JERSEY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MORRIS COUNTY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hanover |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wegmans Land Lease |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 1,786 |
| 0.42 |
| — |
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Land Leases |
|
|
| — |
| — |
| 1,786 |
| 0.42 |
| — |
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES |
|
|
| 14,844,025 |
| 83.2 | %(l) | 342,005 |
| 81.02 |
| 27.76 |
| 23.85 |
|
Multi-Family Properties
|
|
|
| Net |
|
|
| Percentage |
| 2018 |
| Percentage |
| 2018 |
|
|
|
|
| Rentable |
|
|
| Leased |
| Base |
| of Total |
| Average |
|
|
|
|
| Commercial |
|
|
| as of |
| Rent |
| 2018 |
| Base Rent |
|
|
| Year |
| Area |
| Number |
| 12/31/18 |
| ($000’s) |
| Base Rent |
| Per Home |
|
|
| Built |
| (Sq. Ft.) |
| of Units |
| (%) (a) |
| (b) (c) |
| (%) |
| ($) (c) (j) |
|
NEW JERSEY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HUDSON COUNTY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jersey City |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RoseGarden Monaco North |
| 2011 |
| — |
| 243 |
| 93.0 |
| 9,739 |
| 2.31 |
| 3,591 |
|
RoseGarden Monaco South |
| 2011 |
| — |
| 280 |
| 94.6 |
| 10,436 |
| 2.47 |
| 3,282 |
|
Marbella I (g) |
| 2003 |
| — |
| 412 |
| 94.2 |
| 6,008 |
| 1.42 |
| 3,099 |
|
Riverhouse 11 at Port Imperial (g) |
| 2018 |
| — |
| 295 |
| 97.6 |
| 2,110 |
| 0.50 |
| 1,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MIDDLESEX COUNTY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Brunswick |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richmond Court |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 82 |
| 96.6 |
| 1,597 |
| 0.38 |
| 1,685 |
|
Riverwatch Commons |
| 1995 |
| — |
| 118 |
| 96.6 |
| 2,255 |
| 0.54 |
| 1,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MORRIS COUNTY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Morris Plains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature Place (g) |
| 2018 |
| — |
| 197 |
| 94.9 |
| 1,828 |
| 0.43 |
| 1,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNION COUNTY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rahway |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Park Square (i) |
| 2011 |
| 5,934 |
| 159 |
| 95.6 |
| 3,638 |
| 0.86 |
| 1,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total New Jersey Multi-Family |
|
|
| 5,934 |
| 1,786 |
| 95.1 |
| 37,611 |
| 8.91 |
| 2,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEW YORK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WESTCHESTER COUNTY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eastchester |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarry Place at Tuckahoe |
| 2016 |
| 3,275 |
| 108 |
| 95.4 |
| 3,609 |
| 0.86 |
| 2,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total New York Multi-Family |
|
|
| 3,275 |
| 108 |
| 95.4 |
| 3,609 |
| 0.86 |
| 2,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MASSACHUSETTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MIDDLESEX COUNTY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Malden |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Chase at Overlook Ridge |
| 2014 |
| — |
| 664 |
| 97.1 |
| 14,595 |
| 3.46 |
| 1,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUFFOLK COUNTY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East Boston |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portside at Pier One |
| 2014 |
| 3,690 |
| 175 |
| 97.2 |
| 5,421 |
| 1.28 |
| 2,657 |
|
Portside 5/6 (g) |
| 2018 |
| — |
| 296 |
| 91.6 |
| 2,530 |
| 0.60 |
| 1,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revere |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alterra at Overlook Ridge IA |
| 2004 |
| — |
| 310 |
| 95.2 |
| 6,293 |
| 1.49 |
| 1,778 |
|
Alterra at Overlook Ridge IB |
| 2008 |
| — |
| 412 |
| 95.9 |
| 8,472 |
| 2.01 |
| 1,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WORCESTER COUNTY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Worcester |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145 Front at City Square (g) |
| 2018 |
| — |
| 237 |
| 74.7 |
| 1,562 |
| 0.37 |
| 877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Massachusetts Multi-Family |
|
|
| 3,690 |
| 2,094 |
| 93.3 |
| 38,873 |
| 9.21 |
| 1,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Multi-Family Properties |
|
|
| 12,899 |
| 3,988 |
| 94.2 |
| 80,093 |
| 18.98 |
| 1,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL PROPERTIES |
|
|
| 14,856,924 |
| 3,988 |
| N/A |
| 422,098 | (k) | 100.00 |
|
|
|
| Office Properties | ||||||||
| (Continued) | ||||||||
| Percentage | 2015 | 2015 | 2015 | |||||
| Net | Leased | Base | Average | Average | ||||
| Rentable | as of | Rent | Percentage | Base Rent | Effective Rent | |||
| Year | Area | 12/31/15 | ($000’s) | of Total 2015 | Per Sq. Ft. | Per Sq. Ft. | ||
| Property Location | Built | (Sq. Ft.) | (%) (a) | (b) (c) | Base Rent (%) | ($) (c) (d) | ($) (c) (e) | |
| MERCER COUNTY | ||||||||
| Hamilton Township | ||||||||
| 3 AAA Drive | 1981 | 35,270 | 83.0 | 611 | 0.13 | 20.87 | 16.36 | |
| 600 Horizon Drive | 2002 | 95,000 | 100.0 | 1,191 | 0.25 | 12.54 | 11.53 | |
| 700 Horizon Drive | 2007 | 120,000 | 100.0 | 2,529 | 0.53 | 21.08 | 18.73 | |
| 2 South Gold Drive | 1974 | 33,962 | 72.0 | 575 | 0.12 | 23.51 | 20.37 | |
| Princeton | ||||||||
| 103 Carnegie Center | 1984 | 96,000 | 90.3 | 2,183 | 0.46 | 25.18 | 20.80 | |
| 2 Independence Way | 1981 | 67,401 | 0.0 | 333 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 3 Independence Way | 1983 | 111,300 | 100.0 | 2,278 | 0.48 | 20.47 | 14.84 | |
| 100 Overlook Center | 1988 | 149,600 | 89.6 | 3,804 | 0.79 | 28.38 | 25.37 | |
| 5 Vaughn Drive | 1987 | 98,500 | 91.9 | 2,619 | 0.55 | 28.93 | 25.22 | |
| MIDDLESEX COUNTY | ||||||||
| East Brunswick | ||||||||
| 377 Summerhill Road | 1977 | 40,000 | 100.0 | 372 | 0.08 | 9.30 | 8.98 | |
| Edison | ||||||||
| 333 Thornall Street (g) (h) | 1984 | 196,128 | 95.6 | 733 | 0.15 | 28.54 | 25.27 | |
| 343 Thornall Street (c) | 1991 | 195,709 | 100.0 | 4,002 | 0.84 | 20.45 | 17.06 | |
| Plainsboro | ||||||||
| 500 College Road East (f) | 1984 | 158,235 | 55.8 | 2,019 | 0.42 | 22.87 | 19.60 | |
| Woodbridge | ||||||||
| 581 Main Street | 1991 | 200,000 | 99.3 | 5,169 | 1.08 | 26.03 | 22.07 | |
| MONMOUTH COUNTY | ||||||||
| Freehold | ||||||||
| 2 Paragon Way | 1989 | 44,524 | 62.6 | 538 | 0.11 | 19.30 | 16.43 | |
| 3 Paragon Way | 1991 | 66,898 | 89.2 | 1,181 | 0.25 | 19.79 | 17.13 | |
| 4 Paragon Way | 2002 | 63,989 | 91.7 | 679 | 0.14 | 11.57 | 10.52 | |
| 100 Willow Brook Road | 1988 | 60,557 | 55.0 | 830 | 0.17 | 24.92 | 22.88 | |
| Holmdel | ||||||||
| 23 Main Street | 1977 | 350,000 | 100.0 | 4,178 | 0.87 | 11.94 | 9.11 | |
| Middletown | ||||||||
| One River Centre Bldg 1 | 1983 | 122,594 | 97.6 | 3,030 | 0.63 | 25.32 | 21.03 | |
| One River Centre Bldg 2 | 1983 | 120,360 | 97.5 | 2,881 | 0.60 | 24.55 | 20.39 | |
| One River Centre Bldg 3 and 4 | 1984 | 214,518 | 88.7 | 4,551 | 0.95 | 23.92 | 21.57 | |
| Neptune | ||||||||
| 3600 Route 66 | 1989 | 180,000 | 100.0 | 4,165 | 0.87 | 23.14 | 17.97 | |
| Wall Township | ||||||||
| 1305 Campus Parkway | 1988 | 23,350 | 92.4 | 503 | 0.10 | 23.31 | 18.26 | |
| 1350 Campus Parkway | 1990 | 79,747 | 99.9 | 920 | 0.19 | 11.55 | 10.97 | |
| MORRIS COUNTY | ||||||||
| Florham Park | ||||||||
| 325 Columbia Turnpike | 1987 | 168,144 | 100.0 | 3,916 | 0.82 | 23.29 | 19.66 | |
| Morris Plains | ||||||||
| 201 Littleton Road | 1979 | 88,369 | 75.4 | 1,254 | 0.26 | 18.82 | 14.80 | |
| Parsippany | ||||||||
| 4 Campus Drive | 1983 | 147,475 | 78.8 | 2,136 | 0.45 | 18.38 | 14.30 | |
| 6 Campus Drive | 1983 | 148,291 | 79.4 | 2,588 | 0.54 | 21.98 | 18.68 | |
| 7 Campus Drive | 1982 | 154,395 | 86.3 | 2,889 | 0.60 | 21.68 | 18.04 | |
| 8 Campus Drive | 1987 | 215,265 | 69.5 | 3,799 | 0.79 | 25.39 | 22.20 | |
| 9 Campus Drive | 1983 | 156,495 | 87.1 | 962 | 0.20 | 7.06 | 6.05 | |
| 4 Century Drive | 1981 | 100,036 | 52.3 | 1,060 | 0.22 | 20.26 | 17.28 | |
| 5 Century Drive | 1981 | 79,739 | 59.7 | 1,009 | 0.21 | 21.20 | 18.36 | |
| 6 Century Drive | 1981 | 100,036 | 50.5 | 837 | 0.17 | 16.57 | 14.71 | |
| 2 Dryden Way | 1990 | 6,216 | 100.0 | 99 | 0.02 | 15.93 | 14.64 | |
| 4 Gatehall Drive | 1988 | 248,480 | 93.0 | 5,302 | 1.11 | 22.94 | 19.92 |
| Office Properties | ||||||||
| (Continued) | ||||||||
| Percentage | 2015 | 2015 | 2015 | |||||
| Net | Leased | Base | Average | Average | ||||
| Rentable | as of | Rent | Percentage | Base Rent | Effective Rent | |||
| Year | Area | 12/31/15 | ($000’s) | of Total 2015 | Per Sq. Ft. | Per Sq. Ft. | ||
| Property Location | Built | (Sq. Ft.) | (%) (a) | (b) (c) | Base Rent (%) | ($) (c) (d) | ($) (c) (e) | |
| 2 Hilton Court | 1991 | 181,592 | 100.0 | 6,525 | 1.36 | 35.93 | 32.84 | |
| 600 Parsippany Road | 1978 | 96,000 | 95.5 | 1,717 | 0.36 | 18.73 | 15.59 | |
| 1 Sylvan Way | 1989 | 150,557 | 97.7 | 4,178 | 0.87 | 28.40 | 22.90 | |
| 5 Sylvan Way | 1989 | 151,383 | 85.8 | 2,992 | 0.62 | 23.04 | 20.25 | |
| 7 Sylvan Way | 1987 | 145,983 | 0.0 | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 20 Waterview Boulevard | 1988 | 225,550 | 95.0 | 4,734 | 0.99 | 22.09 | 19.97 | |
| 35 Waterview Boulevard | 1990 | 172,498 | 95.7 | 4,062 | 0.85 | 24.61 | 22.23 | |
| 5 Wood Hollow Road | 1979 | 317,040 | 98.6 | 4,102 | 0.86 | 13.12 | 10.21 | |
| PASSAIC COUNTY | ||||||||
| Totowa | ||||||||
| 999 Riverview Drive | 1988 | 56,066 | 86.4 | 885 | 0.18 | 18.27 | 14.66 | |
| SOMERSET COUNTY | ||||||||
| Basking Ridge | ||||||||
| 222 Mount Airy Road | 1986 | 49,000 | 82.2 | 810 | 0.17 | 20.11 | 15.99 | |
| 233 Mount Airy Road | 1987 | 66,000 | 67.5 | 903 | 0.19 | 20.27 | 16.59 | |
| Bridgewater | ||||||||
| 440 Route 22 East | 1990 | 198,376 | 91.1 | 4,662 | 0.97 | 25.80 | 21.64 | |
| 721 Route 202/206 | 1989 | 192,741 | 97.5 | 4,596 | 0.96 | 24.46 | 21.63 | |
| UNION COUNTY | ||||||||
| Clark | ||||||||
| 100 Walnut Avenue | 1985 | 182,555 | 94.1 | 4,361 | 0.91 | 25.39 | 22.38 | |
| Cranford | ||||||||
| 6 Commerce Drive | 1973 | 56,000 | 88.7 | 1,095 | 0.23 | 22.04 | 18.62 | |
| 11 Commerce Drive | 1981 | 90,000 | 67.0 | 1,577 | 0.33 | 26.15 | 22.75 | |
| 12 Commerce Drive | 1967 | 72,260 | 84.7 | 929 | 0.19 | 15.18 | 13.17 | |
| 14 Commerce Drive | 1971 | 67,189 | 100.0 | 1,295 | 0.27 | 19.27 | 16.40 | |
| 20 Commerce Drive | 1990 | 176,600 | 100.0 | 4,123 | 0.86 | 23.35 | 19.99 | |
| 25 Commerce Drive | 1971 | 67,749 | 77.2 | 1,179 | 0.25 | 22.54 | 19.62 | |
| 65 Jackson Drive | 1984 | 82,778 | 34.2 | 847 | 0.18 | 29.92 | 23.49 | |
| New Providence | ||||||||
| 890 Mountain Avenue | 1977 | 80,000 | 49.6 | 1,207 | 0.25 | 30.42 | 27.95 | |
| Total New Jersey Office | 16,035,084 | 85.0 | 323,076 | 67.41 | 24.05 | 20.75 | ||
| NEW YORK | ||||||||
| NEW YORK COUNTY | ||||||||
| New York | ||||||||
| 125 Broad Street | 1970 | 524,476 | 100.0 | 17,745 | 3.70 | 33.83 | 28.13 | |
| WESTCHESTER COUNTY | ||||||||
| Elmsford | ||||||||
| 100 Clearbrook Road (c) | 1975 | 60,000 | 91.7 | 1,048 | 0.22 | 19.05 | 17.34 | |
| Hawthorne | ||||||||
| 1 Skyline Drive | 1980 | 20,400 | 99.0 | 423 | 0.09 | 20.94 | 19.86 | |
| 2 Skyline Drive | 1987 | 30,000 | 100.0 | 542 | 0.11 | 18.07 | 13.73 |
| Office Properties | ||||||||
| (Continued) | ||||||||
| Percentage | 2015 | 2015 | 2015 | |||||
| Net | Leased | Base | Average | Average | ||||
| Rentable | as of | Rent | Percentage | Base Rent | Effective Rent | |||
| Year | Area | 12/31/15 | ($000’s) | of Total 2015 | Per Sq. Ft. | Per Sq. Ft. | ||
| Property Location | Built | (Sq. Ft.) | (%) (a) | (b) (c) | Base Rent (%) | ($) (c) (d) | ($) (c) (e) | |
| 7 Skyline Drive | 1987 | 109,000 | 85.9 | 2,121 | 0.44 | 22.65 | 19.32 | |
| 17 Skyline Drive (f) | 1989 | 85,000 | 100.0 | 1,932 | 0.40 | 22.73 | 22.28 | |
| White Plains | ||||||||
| 1 Barker Avenue | 1975 | 68,000 | 87.3 | 1,483 | 0.31 | 24.98 | 22.29 | |
| 3 Barker Avenue | 1983 | 65,300 | 93.9 | 1,377 | 0.29 | 22.46 | 19.68 | |
| 50 Main Street | 1985 | 309,000 | 86.4 | 7,593 | 1.58 | 28.44 | 23.81 | |
| 11 Martine Avenue | 1987 | 180,000 | 70.7 | 4,117 | 0.86 | 32.35 | 28.37 | |
| 1 Water Street | 1979 | 45,700 | 57.6 | 748 | 0.16 | 28.42 | 24.88 | |
| Yonkers | ||||||||
| 1 Executive Boulevard | 1982 | 112,000 | 100.0 | 2,764 | 0.58 | 24.68 | 22.27 | |
| 3 Executive Boulevard | 1987 | 58,000 | 100.0 | 1,719 | 0.36 | 29.64 | 27.71 | |
| Total New York Office | 1,666,876 | 91.2 | 43,612 | 9.10 | 28.70 | 24.66 | ||
| DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA | ||||||||
| WASHINGTON | ||||||||
| 1201 Connecticut Avenue, NW | 1940 | 169,549 | 92.6 | 6,736 | 1.41 | 42.90 | 37.74 | |
| 1400 L Street, NW | 1987 | 159,000 | 100.0 | 6,238 | 1.30 | 39.23 | 35.16 | |
| Total District of Columbia Office | 328,549 | 96.2 | 12,974 | 2.71 | 41.06 | 36.44 | ||
| MARYLAND | ||||||||
| �� | ||||||||
| PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY | ||||||||
| Greenbelt | ||||||||
| 9200 Edmonston Road | 1973 | 38,690 | 100.0 | 1,057 | 0.22 | 27.32 | 26.78 | |
| 6301 Ivy Lane | 1979 | 112,003 | 68.8 | 1,646 | 0.34 | 21.36 | 19.31 | |
| 6303 Ivy Lane | 1980 | 112,047 | 17.7 | 415 | 0.09 | 20.93 | 18.66 | |
| 6305 Ivy Lane | 1982 | 112,022 | 82.2 | 1,912 | 0.40 | 20.76 | 18.31 | |
| 6404 Ivy Lane | 1987 | 165,234 | 68.8 | 2,561 | 0.54 | 22.53 | 18.75 | |
| 6406 Ivy Lane | 1991 | 163,857 | 77.0 | 2,995 | 0.62 | 23.74 | 19.05 | |
| 6411 Ivy Lane | 1984 | 138,405 | 74.7 | 2,311 | 0.48 | 22.35 | 19.36 | |
| Lanham | ||||||||
| 4200 Parliament Place | 1989 | 122,000 | 31.8 | 1,768 | 0.37 | 45.57 | 43.51 | |
| Total Maryland Office | 964,258 | 63.2 | 14,665 | 3.06 | 24.05 | 21.00 | ||
| TOTAL OFFICE PROPERTIES | 18,994,767 | 84.6 | 394,327 | 82.28 | 24.82 | 21.44 |
| Office/Flex Properties | ||||||||
| Percentage | 2015 | 2015 | 2015 | |||||
| Net | Leased | Base | Average | Average | ||||
| Rentable | as of | Rent | Percentage | Base Rent | Effective Rent | |||
| Year | Area | 12/31/15 | ($000’s) | of Total 2015 | Per Sq. Ft. | Per Sq. Ft. | ||
| Property Location | Built | (Sq. Ft.) | (%) (a) | (b) (c) | Base Rent (%) | ($) (c) (d) | ($) (c) (e) | |
| NEW JERSEY | ||||||||
| BURLINGTON COUNTY | ||||||||
| Burlington | ||||||||
| 3 Terri Lane | 1991 | 64,500 | 93.2 | 568 | 0.12 | 9.45 | 8.27 | |
| 5 Terri Lane | 1992 | 74,555 | 100.0 | 621 | 0.13 | 8.33 | 6.72 | |
| Moorestown | ||||||||
| 2 Commerce Drive | 1986 | 49,000 | 74.1 | 232 | 0.05 | 6.39 | 5.45 | |
| 101 Commerce Drive | 1988 | 64,700 | 100.0 | 275 | 0.06 | 4.25 | 3.85 | |
| 102 Commerce Drive | 1987 | 38,400 | 100.0 | 269 | 0.06 | 7.01 | 5.57 | |
| 201 Commerce Drive | 1986 | 38,400 | 45.8 | 103 | 0.02 | 5.86 | 4.09 | |
| 202 Commerce Drive | 1988 | 51,200 | 83.6 | 136 | 0.03 | 3.18 | 2.94 | |
| 1 Executive Drive | 1989 | 20,570 | 100.0 | 208 | 0.04 | 10.11 | 7.29 | |
| 2 Executive Drive | 1988 | 60,800 | 81.9 | 382 | 0.08 | 7.67 | 5.80 | |
| 101 Executive Drive | 1990 | 29,355 | 99.7 | 300 | 0.06 | 10.25 | 9.36 | |
| 102 Executive Drive | 1990 | 64,000 | 100.0 | 474 | 0.10 | 7.41 | 7.30 | |
| 225 Executive Drive | 1990 | 50,600 | 64.6 | 149 | 0.03 | 4.56 | 3.70 | |
| 97 Foster Road | 1982 | 43,200 | 83.3 | 148 | 0.03 | 4.11 | 3.31 | |
| 1507 Lancer Drive | 1995 | 32,700 | 100.0 | 146 | 0.03 | 4.46 | 3.43 | |
| 1245 North Church Street | 1998 | 52,810 | 83.3 | 221 | 0.05 | 5.02 | 4.27 | |
| 1247 North Church Street | 1998 | 52,790 | 93.8 | 230 | 0.05 | 4.64 | 3.70 | |
| 1256 North Church Street | 1984 | 63,495 | 100.0 | 477 | 0.10 | 7.51 | 6.58 | |
| 840 North Lenola Road | 1995 | 38,300 | 47.0 | 145 | 0.03 | 8.06 | 7.39 | |
| 844 North Lenola Road | 1995 | 28,670 | 100.0 | 206 | 0.04 | 7.19 | 5.93 | |
| 915 North Lenola Road | 1998 | 52,488 | 100.0 | 291 | 0.06 | 5.54 | 5.01 | |
| 2 Twosome Drive | 2000 | 48,600 | 100.0 | 411 | 0.09 | 8.46 | 7.57 | |
| 30 Twosome Drive | 1997 | 39,675 | 99.0 | 260 | 0.05 | 6.62 | 5.12 | |
| 31 Twosome Drive | 1998 | 84,200 | 100.0 | 423 | 0.09 | 5.02 | 4.50 | |
| 40 Twosome Drive | 1996 | 40,265 | 100.0 | 317 | 0.07 | 7.87 | 6.93 | |
| 41 Twosome Drive | 1998 | 43,050 | 88.9 | 273 | 0.06 | 7.13 | 5.77 | |
| 50 Twosome Drive | 1997 | 34,075 | 56.0 | 122 | 0.02 | 6.39 | 5.87 | |
| MERCER COUNTY | ||||||||
| Hamilton Township | ||||||||
| 100 Horizon Center Boulevard | 1989 | 13,275 | 100.0 | 151 | 0.03 | 11.37 | 6.78 | |
| 200 Horizon Drive | 1991 | 45,770 | 92.9 | 706 | 0.15 | 16.60 | 14.84 | |
| 300 Horizon Drive | 1989 | 69,780 | 74.2 | 574 | 0.12 | 11.09 | 8.92 | |
| 500 Horizon Drive | 1990 | 41,205 | 93.8 | 577 | 0.12 | 14.93 | 13.01 | |
| MONMOUTH COUNTY | ||||||||
| Wall Township | ||||||||
| 1325 Campus Parkway | 1988 | 35,000 | 100.0 | 612 | 0.13 | 17.49 | 14.20 | |
| 1340 Campus Parkway | 1992 | 72,502 | 68.8 | 898 | 0.19 | 18.00 | 15.50 | |
| 1345 Campus Parkway | 1995 | 76,300 | 87.6 | 949 | 0.20 | 14.20 | 11.48 | |
| 1433 Highway 34 | 1985 | 69,020 | 98.1 | 702 | 0.15 | 10.37 | 7.61 | |
| 1320 Wyckoff Avenue | 1986 | 20,336 | 100.0 | 228 | 0.05 | 11.21 | 8.65 | |
| 1324 Wyckoff Avenue | 1987 | 21,168 | 92.7 | 185 | 0.04 | 9.43 | 6.78 | |
| PASSAIC COUNTY | ||||||||
| Totowa | ||||||||
| 1 Center Court | 1999 | 38,961 | 100.0 | 571 | 0.12 | 14.66 | 12.55 | |
| 2 Center Court | 1998 | 30,600 | 100.0 | 389 | 0.08 | 12.71 | 6.11 | |
| 11 Commerce Way | 1989 | 47,025 | 100.0 | 552 | 0.11 | 11.74 | 8.68 | |
| 20 Commerce Way | 1992 | 42,540 | 95.5 | 477 | 0.10 | 11.74 | 10.98 | |
| Office/Flex Properties | ||||||||
| (Continued) | ||||||||
| Percentage | 2015 | 2015 | 2015 | |||||
| Net | Leased | Base | Average | Average | ||||
| Rentable | as of | Rent | Percentage | Base Rent | Effective Rent | |||
| Year | Area | 12/31/15 | ($000’s) | of Total 2015 | Per Sq. Ft. | Per Sq. Ft. | ||
| Property Location | Built | (Sq. Ft.) | (%) (a) | (b) (c) | Base Rent (%) | ($) (c) (d) | ($) (c) (e) | |
| 29 Commerce Way | 1990 | 48,930 | 100.0 | 584 | 0.12 | 11.94 | 9.83 | |
| 40 Commerce Way | 1987 | 50,576 | 86.3 | 559 | 0.12 | 12.81 | 9.10 | |
| 45 Commerce Way | 1992 | 51,207 | 100.0 | 575 | 0.12 | 11.23 | 9.92 | |
| 60 Commerce Way | 1988 | 50,333 | 44.1 | 359 | 0.06 | 16.17 | 11.89 | |
| 80 Commerce Way | 1996 | 22,500 | 100.0 | 264 | 0.05 | 11.73 | 9.73 | |
| 100 Commerce Way | 1996 | 24,600 | 88.6 | 288 | 0.06 | 13.21 | 10.97 | |
| 120 Commerce Way | 1994 | 9,024 | 100.0 | 106 | 0.02 | 11.75 | 10.42 | |
| 140 Commerce Way | 1994 | 26,881 | 99.5 | 317 | 0.07 | 11.85 | 10.54 | |
| Total New Jersey Office/Flex | 2,167,931 | 89.2 | 18,010 | 3.76 | 9.31 | 7.69 | ||
| NEW YORK | ||||||||
| WESTCHESTER COUNTY | ||||||||
| Elmsford | ||||||||
| 11 Clearbrook Road | 1974 | 31,800 | 100.0 | 407 | 0.08 | 12.80 | 9.94 | |
| 75 Clearbrook Road | 1990 | 32,720 | 100.0 | 205 | 0.04 | 6.27 | 5.44 | |
| 125 Clearbrook Road | 2002 | 33,000 | 100.0 | 576 | 0.12 | 17.45 | 11.33 | |
| 150 Clearbrook Road | 1975 | 74,900 | 100.0 | 996 | 0.21 | 13.30 | 11.71 | |
| 175 Clearbrook Road | 1973 | 98,900 | 96.7 | 1,575 | 0.33 | 16.47 | 14.90 | |
| 200 Clearbrook Road | 1974 | 94,000 | 93.5 | 1,248 | 0.26 | 14.20 | 12.72 | |
| 250 Clearbrook Road | 1973 | 155,000 | 96.8 | 1,265 | 0.26 | 8.43 | 7.08 | |
| 50 Executive Boulevard | 1969 | 45,200 | 62.8 | 274 | 0.06 | 9.65 | 8.10 | |
| 77 Executive Boulevard | 1977 | 13,000 | 100.0 | 249 | 0.05 | 19.15 | 17.77 | |
| 85 Executive Boulevard | 1968 | 31,000 | 50.0 | 217 | 0.04 | 14.00 | 10.39 | |
| 300 Executive Boulevard | 1970 | 60,000 | 100.0 | 729 | 0.15 | 12.15 | 11.18 | |
| 350 Executive Boulevard | 1970 | 15,400 | 99.4 | 230 | 0.05 | 15.03 | 12.80 | |
| 399 Executive Boulevard | 1962 | 80,000 | 100.0 | 1,063 | 0.22 | 13.29 | 12.71 | |
| 400 Executive Boulevard | 1970 | 42,200 | 63.1 | 528 | 0.11 | 19.83 | 15.74 | |
| 500 Executive Boulevard | 1970 | 41,600 | 100.0 | 765 | 0.16 | 18.39 | 16.73 | |
| 525 Executive Boulevard | 1972 | 61,700 | 100.0 | 1,049 | 0.22 | 17.00 | 15.46 | |
| 1 Westchester Plaza | 1967 | 25,000 | 100.0 | 352 | 0.07 | 14.08 | 11.16 | |
| 2 Westchester Plaza | 1968 | 25,000 | 100.0 | 397 | 0.08 | 15.88 | 12.48 | |
| 3 Westchester Plaza | 1969 | 93,500 | 85.1 | 852 | 0.18 | 10.71 | 8.32 | |
| 4 Westchester Plaza | 1969 | 44,700 | 100.0 | 705 | 0.15 | 15.77 | 12.68 | |
| 5 Westchester Plaza | 1969 | 20,000 | 100.0 | 308 | 0.06 | 15.40 | 12.65 | |
| 6 Westchester Plaza | 1968 | 20,000 | 100.0 | 287 | 0.06 | 14.35 | 10.80 | |
| 7 Westchester Plaza | 1972 | 46,200 | 100.0 | 720 | 0.15 | 15.58 | 14.85 | |
| 8 Westchester Plaza | 1971 | 67,200 | 99.7 | 1,225 | 0.26 | 18.28 | 15.30 | |
| Hawthorne | ||||||||
| 200 Saw Mill River Road | 1965 | 51,100 | 100.0 | 726 | 0.15 | 14.21 | 13.03 | |
| 4 Skyline Drive | 1987 | 80,600 | 93.0 | 1,280 | 0.27 | 17.08 | 13.70 | |
| 5 Skyline Drive | 1980 | 124,022 | 99.8 | 1,851 | 0.39 | 14.95 | 13.12 | |
| 6 Skyline Drive | 1980 | 44,155 | 100.0 | 530 | 0.11 | 12.00 | 7.93 | |
| 8 Skyline Drive | 1985 | 50,000 | 48.1 | 667 | 0.14 | 27.73 | 23.49 | |
| 10 Skyline Drive | 1985 | 20,000 | 100.0 | 392 | 0.08 | 19.60 | 15.75 | |
| 11 Skyline Drive (f) | 1989 | 45,000 | 100.0 | 997 | 0.21 | 22.16 | 21.47 | |
| 12 Skyline Drive (f) | 1999 | 46,850 | 85.1 | 588 | 0.12 | 14.75 | 13.19 | |
| 15 Skyline Drive (f) | 1989 | 55,000 | 86.6 | 364 | 0.08 | 7.64 | 7.01 | |
| Yonkers | ||||||||
| 100 Corporate Boulevard | 1987 | 78,000 | 98.3 | 1,572 | 0.33 | 20.50 | 19.24 | |
| 200 Corporate Boulevard South | 1990 | 84,000 | 58.2 | 931 | 0.19 | 19.04 | 15.67 | |
| 4 Executive Plaza | 1986 | 80,000 | 100.0 | 1,523 | 0.32 | 19.04 | 16.49 | |
| 6 Executive Plaza | 1987 | 80,000 | 95.8 | 1,680 | 0.35 | 21.92 | 19.96 | |
| 1 Odell Plaza | 1980 | 106,000 | 100.0 | 1,725 | 0.36 | 16.27 | 14.83 | |
| 3 Odell Plaza | 1984 | 71,065 | 100.0 | 1,596 | 0.33 | 22.46 | 20.83 |
Office/Flex Properties (continued) | ||||||||
| and Industrial/Warehouse, Retail Properties, and Land Leases | ||||||||
| Percentage | 2015 | 2015 | 2015 | |||||
| Net | Leased | Base | Average | Average | ||||
| Rentable | as of | Rent | Percentage | Base Rent | Effective Rent | |||
| Year | Area | 12/31/15 | ($000’s) | of Total 2015 | Per Sq. Ft. | Per Sq. Ft. | ||
| Property Location | Built | (Sq. Ft.) | (%) (a) | (b) (c) | Base Rent (%) | ($) (c) (d) | ($) (c) (e) | |
| 5 Odell Plaza | 1983 | 38,400 | 99.6 | 650 | 0.14 | 17.00 | 15.45 | |
| 7 Odell Plaza | 1984 | 42,600 | 100.0 | 699 | 0.15 | 16.41 | 13.97 | |
| Total New York Office/Flex | 2,348,812 | 93.1 | 33,993 | 7.09 | 15.55 | 13.55 | ||
| CONNECTICUT | ||||||||
| FAIRFIELD COUNTY | ||||||||
| Stamford | ||||||||
| 419 West Avenue | 1986 | 88,000 | 100.0 | 1,550 | 0.32 | 17.61 | 14.98 | |
| 500 West Avenue | 1988 | 25,000 | 100.0 | 482 | 0.10 | 19.28 | 16.00 | |
| 550 West Avenue | 1990 | 54,000 | 81.3 | 794 | 0.17 | 18.09 | 16.86 | |
| 600 West Avenue | 1999 | 66,000 | 100.0 | 670 | 0.14 | 10.15 | 9.55 | |
| 650 West Avenue | 1998 | 40,000 | 100.0 | 600 | 0.13 | 15.00 | 11.75 | |
| Total Connecticut Office/Flex | 273,000 | 96.3 | 4,096 | 0.86 | 15.58 | 13.53 | ||
| TOTAL OFFICE/FLEX PROPERTIES | 4,789,743 | 91.5 | 56,099 | 11.71 | 12.80 | 10.96 | ||
| NEW YORK | ||||||||
| WESTCHESTER COUNTY | ||||||||
| Elmsford | ||||||||
| 1 Warehouse Lane (f) | 1957 | 6,600 | 100.0 | 107 | 0.02 | 16.21 | 15.00 | |
| 2 Warehouse Lane (f) | 1957 | 10,900 | 100.0 | 160 | 0.03 | 14.68 | 13.76 | |
| 3 Warehouse Lane (f) | 1957 | 77,200 | 100.0 | 399 | 0.08 | 5.17 | 4.96 | |
| 4 Warehouse Lane (f) | 1957 | 195,500 | 97.0 | 2,236 | 0.47 | 11.79 | 10.50 | |
| 5 Warehouse Lane (f) | 1957 | 75,100 | 97.1 | 962 | 0.20 | 13.19 | 11.93 | |
| 6 Warehouse Lane (f) | 1982 | 22,100 | 100.0 | 555 | 0.12 | 25.11 | 24.43 | |
| Total Industrial/Warehouse Properties | 387,400 | 97.9 | 4,419 | 0.92 | 11.65 | 10.63 | ||
| NEW JERSEY | ||||||||
| HUDSON COUNTY | ||||||||
| Weehawken | ||||||||
| 500 Avenue at Port Imperial | 2013 | 16,736 | 61.2 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Total New Jersey Retail Properties | 16,736 | 61.2 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||
| NEW YORK | ||||||||
| WESTCHESTER COUNTY | ||||||||
| Tarrytown | ||||||||
| 230 White Plains Road | 1984 | 9,300 | 100.0 | 67 | 0.01 | 7.20 | 6.99 | |
| Yonkers | ||||||||
| 2 Executive Boulevard | 1986 | 8,000 | 100.0 | 305 | 0.07 | 38.13 | 37.88 | |
| Total New York Retail Properties | 17,300 | 100.0 | 372 | 0.08 | 21.50 | 21.27 | ||
| Total Retail Properties | 34,036 | 80.9 | 372 | 0.08 | 13.51 | 13.36 | ||
| NEW YORK | ||||||||
| WESTCHESTER COUNTY | ||||||||
| Elmsford | ||||||||
| 700 Executive Boulevard | - | - | - | 160 | 0.03 | - | -- | |
| Land Leases | ||||||||
| (continued) | ||||||||
| Percentage | 2015 | 2015 | 2015 | |||||
| Net | Leased | Base | Average | Average | ||||
| Rentable | as of | Rent | Percentage | Base Rent | Effective Rent | |||
| Year | Area | 12/31/15 | ($000’s) | of Total 2015 | Per Sq. Ft. | Per Sq. Ft. | ||
| Property Location | Built | (Sq. Ft.) | (%) (a) | (b) (c) | Base Rent (%) | ($) (c) (d) | ($) (c) (e) | |
| Yonkers | ||||||||
| 1 Enterprise Boulevard | - | - | - | 197 | 0.04 | - | - | |
| Total New York Land Leases | - | - | 357 | 0.07 | - | - | ||
| MARYLAND | �� | |||||||
| PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY | ||||||||
| Greenbelt | ||||||||
| Capital Office Park Parcel A | - | - | - | 153 | 0.03 | - | - | |
| Total Maryland Land Leases | - | - | 153 | 0.03 | - | - | ||
| Total Land Leases | - | - | 510 | 0.10 | - | - | ||
| TOTAL COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES | 24,205,946 | 86.2 | 455,727 | 95.09 | 22.07 | 19.06 | ||
| Multi-Family Properties | ||||||||
| Net | Percentage | 2015 | Percentage | 2015 | ||||
| Rentable | Leased | Base | of Total | Average | ||||
| Commercial | as of | Rent | 2015 | Base Rent | ||||
| Year | Area | Number | 12/31/15 | ($000’s) | Base Rent | Per Home | ||
| Built | (Sq. Ft.) | of Units | (%) (a) | (b) (c) | (%) | ($) (c) (i) | ||
| NEW JERSEY | ||||||||
| MIDDLESEX COUNTY | ||||||||
| New Brunswick | ||||||||
| Richmond Court | 1997 | - | 82 | 95.1 | 1,444 | 0.30 | 1,543 | |
| Riverwatch Commons | 1995 | - | 118 | 93.2 | 2,080 | 0.43 | 1,576 | |
| UNION COUNTY | ||||||||
| Rahway | ||||||||
| Park Square | 2011 | 5,934 | 159 | 95.0 | 3,679 | 0.77 | 2,030 | |
| Total New Jersey Multi-Family | 5,934 | 359 | 94.4 | 7,203 | 1.50 | 1,771 | ||
| MASSACHUSETTS | ||||||||
| ESSEX COUNTY | ||||||||
| Andover | ||||||||
| Andover Place | 1988 | - | 220 | 99.1 | 3,396 | 0.71 | 1,298 | |
| SUFFOLK COUNTY | ||||||||
| Revere | ||||||||
| Alterra at Overlook Ridge IA | 2004 | - | 310 | 95.8 | 5,511 | 1.15 | 1,546 | |
| Alterra at Overlook Ridge IB | 2008 | - | 412 | 97.1 | 7,439 | 1.55 | 1,550 | |
| Total Massachusetts Multi-Family | - | 942 | 97.1 | 16,346 | 3.41 | 1,489 | ||
| Total Multi-Family Properties | 5,934 | 1,301 | 96.4 | 23,549 | 4.91 | 1,565 | ||
| TOTAL PROPERTIES | 24,211,880 | 1,301 | 479,276 | (j) | 100.00 |
Footnotes to Property List (dollars in thousands, except per square foot amounts):
(a) | |
Percentage leased includes all leases in effect as of the period end date, some of which have commencement dates in the future and leases expiring December 31, | |
(b) | Total base rent for the |
(c) | Excludes space leased by the Company. |
(d) | Base rent for the 12 months ended December 31, |
(e) | Total base rent, determined in accordance with GAAP, for |
(f) | This property is located on land leased by the Company. |
(g) | As this property was acquired, commenced initial operations or initially consolidated by the Company during the 12 months ended December 31, |
(h) | Property being considered for repositioning, redevelopment or potential disposition. |
(i) | This property was disposed of by the Company in January 2019. |
(j) | Annualized base rent for the 12 months ended December 31, |
(k) | Excludes |
(l) | Excludes properties being considered for repositioning, redevelopment, potential sale, or being prepared for lease up. |
PERCENTAGE LEASED
The following table sets forth the year-end percentages of commercial square feet leased in the Company’s stabilized operating Consolidated Properties for the last five years:
| Percentage of | |
| December 31, | Square Feet Leased (%) (a) |
| 2015 | 86.2 |
| 2014 | 84.2 |
| 2013 | 86.1 |
| 2012 | 87.2 |
| 2011 | 88.3 |
|
| Percentage of |
|
December 31, |
| Square Feet Leased (%) (a) |
|
2018 |
| 83.2 | (b) |
2017 |
| 87.6 | (b) |
2016 |
| 90.6 | (b) |
2015 |
| 86.2 |
|
2014 |
| 84.2 |
|
(a) Percentage of square-feet leased includes all leases in effect as of the period end date, some of which have commencement dates in the future and leases that expire at the period end date. For all years, excludes properties being prepared for lease up.
(b) Excludes properties being considered for repositioning, redevelopment or potential sale. Inclusive of such properties, percentage of square feet leased as of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was 81.7, 85.6 and 89.6 percent, respectively.
SIGNIFICANT TENANTS
The following table sets forth a schedule of the Company’s 50 largest commercial tenants for the Consolidated Properties as of December 31, 20152018 based upon annualized base rental revenue:
| Percentage of | ||||||
| Annualized | Company | Square | Percentage | Year of | ||
| Number of | Base Rental | Annualized Base | Feet | Total Company | Lease | |
| Properties | Revenue ($) (a) | Rental Revenue (%) | Leased | Leased Sq. Ft. (%) | Expiration | |
| DB Services New Jersey, Inc. | 2 | 12,335,216 | 2.5 | 409,166 | 2.0 | 2017 |
| National Union Fire Insurance | ||||||
| Company of Pittsburgh, PA | 2 | 11,191,057 | 2.3 | 388,651 | 1.9 | (b) |
| Bank Of Tokyo-Mitsubishi FUJI, Ltd. | 1 | 10,540,716 | 2.1 | 282,606 | 1.4 | (c) |
| United States of America-GSA | 12 | 9,357,707 | 1.9 | 287,169 | 1.4 | (d) |
| Forest Research Institute, Inc. | 1 | 9,070,892 | 1.8 | 215,659 | 1.1 | 2017 |
| ICAP Securities USA, LLC | 2 | 7,608,702 | 1.5 | 180,946 | 0.9 | (e) |
| Montefiore Medical Center | 7 | 7,432,828 | 1.5 | 314,049 | 1.5 | (f) |
| KPMG, LLP | 3 | 6,483,411 | 1.3 | 224,364 | 1.1 | (g) |
| Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. | 1 | 6,381,982 | 1.3 | 171,900 | 0.8 | 2022 |
| TD Ameritrade Online Holdings | 1 | 6,223,323 | 1.3 | 188,776 | 0.9 | 2020 |
| Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner | 2 | 6,173,816 | 1.2 | 303,545 | 1.5 | (h) |
| CohnReznick, LLP | 3 | 4,983,681 | 1.0 | 170,141 | 0.8 | (i) |
| New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC | 2 | 4,841,564 | 1.0 | 212,816 | 1.0 | (j) |
| HQ Global Workplaces, LLC | 15 | 4,691,873 | 0.9 | 244,120 | 1.2 | (k) |
| Vonage America, Inc. | 1 | 4,515,000 | 0.9 | 350,000 | 1.7 | 2023 |
| Arch Insurance Company | 1 | 4,005,563 | 0.8 | 106,815 | 0.5 | 2024 |
| AECOM Technology Corporation | 1 | 3,707,752 | 0.7 | 91,414 | 0.4 | 2029 |
| Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. | 1 | 3,673,536 | 0.7 | 114,798 | 0.6 | 2026 |
| Morgan Stanley Smith Barney | 3 | 3,665,965 | 0.7 | 129,896 | 0.6 | (l) |
| UBS Financial Services, Inc. | 3 | 3,606,759 | 0.7 | 127,429 | 0.6 | (m) |
| Allstate Insurance Company | 5 | 3,250,962 | 0.7 | 135,816 | 0.7 | (n) |
| SunAmerica Asset Management, LLC | 1 | 3,167,756 | 0.6 | 69,621 | 0.3 | 2018 |
| Alpharma, LLC | 1 | 3,142,580 | 0.6 | 112,235 | 0.6 | 2018 |
| Tullett Prebon Holdings Corp. | 1 | 3,127,970 | 0.6 | 100,759 | 0.5 | 2023 |
| TierPoint New York, LLC | 2 | 3,014,150 | 0.6 | 131,078 | 0.6 | 2024 |
| E*Trade Financial Corporation | 1 | 2,930,757 | 0.6 | 106,573 | 0.5 | 2022 |
| Natixis North America, Inc. | 1 | 2,823,569 | 0.6 | 89,907 | 0.4 | 2021 |
| AAA Mid-Atlantic, Inc. | 2 | 2,779,829 | 0.6 | 129,784 | 0.6 | (o) |
| SUEZ Water Management & Services Inc. | 1 | 2,727,383 | 0.6 | 121,217 | 0.6 | (p) |
| Plymouth Rock Management Company | ||||||
| of New Jersey | 2 | 2,725,811 | 0.6 | 106,618 | 0.5 | 2020 |
| Tradeweb Markets, LLC | 1 | 2,721,070 | 0.6 | 65,242 | 0.3 | 2027 |
| New Jersey Turnpike Authority | 1 | 2,605,798 | 0.5 | 100,223 | 0.5 | 2017 |
| Continental Casualty Company | 2 | 2,596,584 | 0.5 | 94,224 | 0.5 | (q) |
| Lowenstein Sandler LLP | 1 | 2,565,602 | 0.5 | 98,677 | 0.5 | 2017 |
| Connell Foley, LLP | 2 | 2,475,314 | 0.5 | 95,130 | 0.5 | (r) |
| Bunge Management Services, Inc. | 1 | 2,372,387 | 0.5 | 91,509 | 0.4 | (s) |
| Movado Group, Inc. | 1 | 2,359,824 | 0.5 | 98,326 | 0.5 | 2018 |
| Bozzuto & Associates, Inc. | 1 | 2,359,542 | 0.5 | 104,636 | 0.5 | 2025 |
| Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C. | 1 | 2,337,363 | 0.5 | 56,322 | 0.3 | 2030 |
| AMTrust Financial Services, Inc. | 1 | 2,306,760 | 0.5 | 76,892 | 0.4 | 2023 |
| Savvis Communications Corporation | 1 | 2,287,168 | 0.5 | 71,474 | 0.4 | 2025 |
| Norris, McLaughlin & Marcus, PA | 1 | 2,259,738 | 0.5 | 86,913 | 0.4 | 2017 |
| Barr Laboratories, Inc. | 1 | 2,209,107 | 0.4 | 89,510 | 0.4 | 2016 |
| Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp. | 2 | 2,170,167 | 0.4 | 71,153 | 0.3 | 2021 |
| New Jersey City University | 1 | 2,084,614 | 0.4 | 68,348 | 0.3 | 2035 |
| Sun Chemical Management, LLC | 1 | 2,034,798 | 0.4 | 66,065 | 0.3 | 2019 |
| Syncsort, Inc. | 1 | 1,991,439 | 0.4 | 73,757 | 0.4 | 2018 |
| Jeffries, LLC | 1 | 1,945,653 | 0.4 | 62,763 | 0.3 | 2023 |
| American General Life Insurance Company | 1 | 1,854,975 | 0.4 | 74,199 | 0.4 | 2024 |
| Bressler, Amery & Ross, P.C. | 1 | 1,766,850 | 0.4 | 70,674 | 0.3 | 2023 |
| Totals | 205,486,863 | 41.5 | 7,233,905 | 35.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Percentage of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Annualized |
| Company |
| Square |
| Percentage |
| Year of |
|
|
| Number of |
| Base Rental |
| Annualized Base |
| Feet |
| Total Company |
| Lease |
|
|
| Properties |
| Revenue ($) (a) |
| Rental Revenue (%) |
| Leased |
| Leased Sq. Ft. (%) |
| Expiration |
|
MUFG Bank Ltd. |
| 1 |
| 11,465,968 |
| 3.4 |
| 282,606 |
| 2.4 |
|
| (b) |
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner |
| 3 |
| 10,974,626 |
| 3.2 |
| 430,926 |
| 3.7 |
|
| (c) |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
| 1 |
| 10,888,238 |
| 3.2 |
| 290,353 |
| 2.5 |
| 2033 |
|
Dun & Bradstreet Corporation |
| 2 |
| 7,464,280 |
| 2.2 |
| 192,280 |
| 1.6 |
| 2023 |
|
Montefiore Medical Center |
| 7 |
| 7,327,505 |
| 2.2 |
| 296,572 |
| 2.5 |
|
| (d) |
Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. |
| 1 |
| 6,773,878 |
| 2.0 |
| 171,900 |
| 1.5 |
| 2022 |
|
TD Ameritrade Services Company, Inc. |
| 1 |
| 6,762,294 |
| 2.0 |
| 193,873 |
| 1.6 |
| 2020 |
|
DB Services New Jersey, Inc. |
| 1 |
| 6,453,195 |
| 1.9 |
| 125,916 |
| 1.1 |
| 2019 |
|
E*Trade Financial Corporation |
| 1 |
| 5,290,600 |
| 1.6 |
| 132,265 |
| 1.1 |
| 2030 |
|
KPMG, LLP |
| 2 |
| 5,181,897 |
| 1.5 |
| 120,947 |
| 1.0 |
|
| (e) |
Plymouth Rock Management Company of New Jersey |
| 2 |
| 5,141,920 |
| 1.5 |
| 159,326 |
| 1.4 |
|
| (f) |
Vonage America, Inc. |
| 1 |
| 4,732,000 |
| 1.4 |
| 350,000 |
| 3.0 |
| 2023 |
|
HQ Global Workplaces, LLC |
| 7 |
| 4,566,054 |
| 1.3 |
| 152,441 |
| 1.3 |
|
| (g) |
Investors Bank |
| 2 |
| 4,392,845 |
| 1.3 |
| 139,296 |
| 1.2 |
|
| (h) |
Pfizer, Inc. |
| 1 |
| 4,306,008 |
| 1.3 |
| 113,316 |
| 1.0 |
| 2024 |
|
Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp. |
| 1 |
| 4,156,989 |
| 1.2 |
| 111,105 |
| 0.9 |
| 2036 |
|
ICAP Securities USA, LLC |
| 2 |
| 4,079,450 |
| 1.2 |
| 121,871 |
| 1.0 |
|
| (i) |
Arch Insurance Company |
| 1 |
| 4,005,563 |
| 1.2 |
| 106,815 |
| 0.9 |
| 2024 |
|
Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. |
| 1 |
| 3,673,536 |
| 1.1 |
| 114,798 |
| 1.0 |
| 2026 |
|
First Data Corporation |
| 1 |
| 3,641,873 |
| 1.1 |
| 88,374 |
| 0.8 |
|
| (j) |
Natixis North America, Inc. |
| 1 |
| 3,093,290 |
| 0.9 |
| 89,907 |
| 0.8 |
| 2021 |
|
Cardinia Real Estate LLC |
| 1 |
| 3,051,241 |
| 0.9 |
| 79,771 |
| 0.7 |
| 2032 |
|
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA |
| 1 |
| 3,045,068 |
| 0.9 |
| 117,118 |
| 1.0 |
| 2019 |
|
TierPoint New York, LLC |
| 2 |
| 3,038,971 |
| 0.9 |
| 131,078 |
| 1.1 |
| 2024 |
|
Zurich American Insurance Company |
| 1 |
| 2,707,320 |
| 0.8 |
| 64,414 |
| 0.5 |
| 2032 |
|
Leo Pharma Inc. |
| 1 |
| 2,694,297 |
| 0.8 |
| 78,479 |
| 0.7 |
| 2027 |
|
Hackensack Meridian Health, Inc. |
| 1 |
| 2,518,203 |
| 0.7 |
| 69,841 |
| 0.6 |
| 2027 |
|
AMTrust Financial Services, Inc. |
| 1 |
| 2,460,544 |
| 0.7 |
| 76,892 |
| 0.7 |
| 2023 |
|
Tradeweb Markets, LLC |
| 1 |
| 2,283,470 |
| 0.7 |
| 65,242 |
| 0.6 |
| 2027 |
|
Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC |
| 2 |
| 2,217,342 |
| 0.7 |
| 57,870 |
| 0.5 |
|
| (k) |
New Jersey City University |
| 1 |
| 2,212,209 |
| 0.7 |
| 68,348 |
| 0.6 |
| 2035 |
|
Movado Group, Inc. |
| 1 |
| 2,206,225 |
| 0.7 |
| 90,050 |
| 0.8 |
| 2030 |
|
Jeffries, LLC |
| 1 |
| 2,133,942 |
| 0.6 |
| 62,763 |
| 0.5 |
| 2023 |
|
Torre Lazur Healthcare Group, Inc. |
| 1 |
| 2,126,340 |
| 0.6 |
| 70,878 |
| 0.6 |
| 2030 |
|
The Prudential Insurance Company of America |
| 1 |
| 2,086,629 |
| 0.6 |
| 60,482 |
| 0.5 |
| 2023 |
|
Trustees of Princeton Univ. |
| 1 |
| 2,058,079 |
| 0.6 |
| 67,478 |
| 0.6 |
| 2027 |
|
B&G Foods, Inc. |
| 1 |
| 1,927,693 |
| 0.6 |
| 66,934 |
| 0.6 |
| 2026 |
|
GBT US LLC |
| 1 |
| 1,920,566 |
| 0.6 |
| 49,563 |
| 0.4 |
| 2026 |
|
PBF Holding Company, LLC |
| 1 |
| 1,919,223 |
| 0.6 |
| 57,721 |
| 0.5 |
| 2022 |
|
Savvis Communications, LLC |
| 1 |
| 1,858,324 |
| 0.5 |
| 71,474 |
| 0.6 |
| 2025 |
|
American General Life Insurance Company |
| 1 |
| 1,854,975 |
| 0.5 |
| 74,199 |
| 0.6 |
| 2024 |
|
SunAmerica Asset Management, LLC |
| 1 |
| 1,853,136 |
| 0.5 |
| 36,336 |
| 0.3 |
| 2023 |
|
Fujifilm Medical Systems U.S.A., Inc. |
| 1 |
| 1,848,000 |
| 0.5 |
| 88,000 |
| 0.7 |
| 2019 |
|
UBS Financial Services, Inc. |
| 3 |
| 1,842,643 |
| 0.5 |
| 53,987 |
| 0.5 |
|
| (l) |
Bressler, Amery & Ross, P.C. |
| 1 |
| 1,766,850 |
| 0.5 |
| 70,674 |
| 0.6 |
| 2023 |
|
Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank (U.S.A.) Limited |
| 1 |
| 1,711,454 |
| 0.5 |
| 38,134 |
| 0.3 |
| 2024 |
|
Budd Larner, P.C. |
| 1 |
| 1,699,436 |
| 0.5 |
| 47,670 |
| 0.4 |
| 2024 |
|
Securitas Security Services |
| 1 |
| 1,693,571 |
| 0.5 |
| 87,561 |
| 0.7 |
|
| (m) |
Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc. |
| 1 |
| 1,674,975 |
| 0.5 |
| 66,999 |
| 0.6 |
| 2024 |
|
Global Aerospace Inc. |
| 1 |
| 1,556,457 |
| 0.5 |
| 47,891 |
| 0.4 |
| 2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
|
| 186,339,192 |
| 54.9 |
| 5,802,734 |
| 49.5 |
|
|
|
See footnotes on subsequent page.
Significant Tenants Footnotes
(a) | |
Annualized base rental revenue is based on actual December | |
(b) | |
45,256 square feet expire in 2019; 237,350 square feet expire in 2029. | |
(c) | 9,356 square feet expire in |
(d) | 650 square feet expire in 2019; 295,922 square feet expire in 2032. |
(e) | 66,606 square feet expire in 2024; 54,341 square feet expire in 2026. |
(f) | 29,540 square feet expire in 2019; 129,786 square feet expire in 2031. |
(g) | 17,855 square feet expire in 2021; 38,930 square feet expire in 2023; 59,853 square feet expire in 2024; 20,395 square feet expire in 2026; 15,408 square feet expire in 2027. |
(h) | 82,936 square feet expire in 2026; 56,360 square feet expire in 2030. |
(i) | 63,372 square feet expire in 2023; 21,112 square feet expire in 2025; 37,387 square feet expire in 2033. |
(j) | 8,014 square feet expire in 2026; 80,360 square feet expire in 2029. |
(k) | 25,762 square feet expire in 2022; |
(l) | |
27,274 square feet expire in 2022; 26,713 square feet expire in | |
(m) | 6,279 square feet expire in |
The following table sets forth a schedule of lease expirations for the total of the Company’s office, office/flex, industrial/warehouse and stand-alone retail properties included in the Consolidated Commercial Properties beginning January 1, 2016,2019, assuming that none of the tenants exercise renewal or termination options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Annual Base |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Percentage Of |
|
|
| Rent Per Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Rentable |
| Total Leased |
| Annualized |
| Rentable |
| Percentage Of |
|
|
|
|
| Area Subject |
| Square Feet |
| Base Rental |
| Square Foot |
| Annual Base |
|
|
| Number Of |
| To Expiring |
| Represented |
| Revenue Under |
| Represented |
| Rent Under |
|
Year Of |
| Leases |
| Leases |
| By Expiring |
| Expiring |
| By Expiring |
| Expiring |
|
Expiration |
| Expiring (a) |
| (Sq. Ft.) |
| Leases (%) |
| Leases ($) (b) |
| Leases ($) |
| Leases (%) |
|
2019 |
| 116 |
| 1,173,185 |
| 10.0 |
| 33,533,699 |
| 28.58 |
| 9.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 |
| 106 |
| 701,983 |
| 6.0 |
| 19,169,051 |
| 27.31 |
| 5.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021 |
| 100 |
| 1,050,810 |
| 8.9 |
| 31,078,420 |
| 29.58 |
| 9.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022 |
| 105 |
| 985,721 |
| 8.4 |
| 24,964,494 |
| 25.33 |
| 7.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023 |
| 95 |
| 1,861,636 |
| 15.8 |
| 50,369,288 |
| 27.06 |
| 14.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024 |
| 86 |
| 1,359,720 |
| 11.6 |
| 39,325,965 |
| 28.92 |
| 11.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025 |
| 37 |
| 601,439 |
| 5.1 |
| 15,728,808 |
| 26.15 |
| 4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026 |
| 47 |
| 740,426 |
| 6.3 |
| 23,098,690 |
| 31.20 |
| 6.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2027 |
| 21 |
| 763,605 |
| 6.5 |
| 20,924,676 |
| 27.40 |
| 6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2028 |
| 13 |
| 257,312 |
| 2.2 |
| 7,840,005 |
| 30.47 |
| 2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2029 |
| 18 |
| 497,080 |
| 4.2 |
| 18,207,547 |
| 36.63 |
| 5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2030 and thereafter |
| 38 |
| 1,757,833 |
| 15.0 |
| 55,493,892 |
| 31.57 |
| 16.3 |
|
Totals/Weighted Average |
| 782 |
| 11,750,750 |
| 100.0 |
| 339,734,535 |
| 28.91 |
| 100.0 |
|
| Average | |||||||
| Annual Base | |||||||
| Percentage Of | Rent Per Net | ||||||
| Net Rentable | Total Leased | Annualized | Rentable | Percentage Of | |||
| Area Subject | Square Feet | Base Rental | Square Foot | Annual Base | |||
| Number Of | To Expiring | Represented | Revenue Under | Represented | Rent Under | ||
| Year Of | Leases | Leases | By Expiring | Expiring | By Expiring | Expiring | |
| Expiration | Expiring (a) | (Sq. Ft.) | Leases (%) | Leases ($) (b) | Leases ($) | Leases (%) | |
| 2016 | 267 | 1,572,681 | 7.7 | 36,045,597 | 22.92 | 7.3 | |
| 2017 | 329 | 3,591,173 | 17.6 | 90,429,372 | 25.18 | 18.3 | |
| 2018 | 297 | 2,893,301 | 14.2 | 66,931,429 | 23.13 | 13.5 | |
| 2019 | 252 | 2,459,708 | 12.1 | 53,078,243 | 21.58 | 10.7 | |
| 2020 | 218 | 1,748,600 | 8.6 | 38,862,232 | 22.22 | 7.9 | |
| 2021 | 156 | 1,511,466 | 7.4 | 39,344,311 | 26.03 | 8.0 | |
| 2022 | 104 | 1,100,641 | 5.4 | 27,239,446 | 24.75 | 5.5 | |
| 2023 | 77 | 1,580,626 | 7.8 | 36,177,980 | 22.89 | 7.3 | |
| 2024 | 63 | 1,127,620 | 5.5 | 28,279,528 | 25.08 | 5.7 | |
| 2025 | 37 | 679,680 | 3.3 | 15,737,169 | 23.15 | 3.2 | |
| 2026 | 39 | 803,722 | 4.0 | 22,626,630 | 28.15 | 4.6 | |
| 2027 and thereafter | 29 | 1,303,149 | 6.4 | 39,674,099 | 30.44 | 8.0 | |
| Totals/Weighted | |||||||
| Average | 1,868 | 20,372,367 | (c) (d) | 100.0 | 494,426,036 | 24.27 | 100.0 |
(a) | Includes office, office/flex, industrial/warehouse and stand-alone retail property tenants only. Excludes leases for amenity, retail, parking and month-to-month tenants. Some tenants have multiple leases. |
(b) | Annualized base rental revenue is based on actual December |
(c) | Includes leases expiring December 31, |
(d) | Reconciliation to Company’s total net rentable |
Square Feet | |||
Square footage leased to commercial tenants | 11,750,750 | ||
Square footage used for corporate offices, management offices, building use, retail tenants, food services, other ancillary service tenants and occupancy adjustments | 350,470 | ||
Square footage unleased | 2,717,669 | ||
Total net rentable commercial square footage (does not include land leases) | |||
14,818,889 |
The following table lists the Company’s 30 largest commercial tenants industry classifications based on annualized contractual base rent of the Consolidated Properties:
| Annualized | Percentage of | Percentage of | ||
| Base Rental | Company | Square | Total Company | |
| Revenue | Annualized Base | Feet Leased | Leased | |
| Industry Classification (a) | ($) (b) (c) (d) | Rental Revenue (%) | (c) (d) | Sq. Ft. (%) |
| Securities, Commodity Contracts & Other Financial | 73,300,946 | 14.8 | 2,411,919 | 11.8 |
| Insurance Carriers & Related Activities | 53,005,697 | 10.7 | 1,909,858 | 9.4 |
| Manufacturing | 37,064,034 | 7.5 | 1,727,033 | 8.5 |
| Legal Services | 33,985,830 | 6.9 | 1,256,507 | 6.2 |
| Credit Intermediation & Related Activities | 31,980,298 | 6.5 | 1,043,929 | 5.1 |
| Computer System Design Services | 23,435,938 | 4.7 | 998,329 | 4.9 |
| Accounting/Tax Prep. | 22,512,824 | 4.6 | 811,535 | 4.0 |
| Health Care & Social Assistance | 21,929,119 | 4.4 | 1,141,578 | 5.6 |
| Wholesale Trade | 17,043,454 | 3.4 | 1,145,478 | 5.6 |
| Telecommunications | 16,633,309 | 3.4 | 904,012 | 4.4 |
| Scientific Research/Development | 15,345,895 | 3.1 | 506,622 | 2.5 |
| Public Administration | 15,001,287 | 3.0 | 532,084 | 2.6 |
| Architectural/Engineering | 13,795,448 | 2.8 | 535,368 | 2.6 |
| Admin & Support, Waste Mgt. & Remediation Services | 13,677,967 | 2.8 | 669,030 | 3.3 |
| Management/Scientific | 11,518,092 | 2.3 | 440,580 | 2.2 |
| Other Services (except Public Administration) | 11,505,422 | 2.3 | 464,951 | 2.3 |
| Other Professional | 10,851,013 | 2.2 | 495,727 | 2.4 |
| Real Estate & Rental & Leasing | 8,304,371 | 1.7 | 441,061 | 2.2 |
| Advertising/Related Services | 7,942,701 | 1.6 | 286,754 | 1.4 |
| Retail Trade | 7,842,352 | 1.6 | 467,833 | 2.3 |
| Utilities | 7,376,726 | 1.5 | 325,889 | 1.6 |
| Transportation | 6,309,982 | 1.3 | 315,484 | 1.5 |
| Construction | 4,983,050 | 1.0 | 276,448 | 1.4 |
| Educational Services | 4,651,356 | 0.9 | 192,576 | 0.9 |
| Data Processing Services | 3,963,335 | 0.8 | 144,947 | 0.7 |
| Publishing Industries | 3,776,840 | 0.8 | 185,577 | 0.9 |
| Arts, Entertainment & Recreation | 3,300,499 | 0.7 | 240,102 | 1.2 |
| Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting | 2,372,387 | 0.5 | 91,509 | 0.4 |
| Information Services | 2,031,789 | 0.4 | 67,021 | 0.3 |
| Broadcasting | 1,812,224 | 0.4 | 52,732 | 0.3 |
| Other | 7,171,851 | 1.4 | 289,894 | 1.5 |
| TOTAL | 494,426,036 | 100.0 | 20,372,367 | 100.0 |
|
| Annualized |
| Percentage of |
|
|
| Percentage of |
|
|
| Base Rental |
| Company |
| Square |
| Total Company |
|
|
| Revenue |
| Annualized Base |
| Feet Leased |
| Leased |
|
Industry Classification (a) |
| ($) (b) (c) (d) |
| Rental Revenue (%) |
| (c) (d) |
| Sq. Ft. (%) |
|
Securities, Commodity Contracts & Other Financial |
| 68,916,174 |
| 20.3 |
| 2,071,256 |
| 17.6 |
|
Credit Intermediation & Related Activities |
| 40,138,788 |
| 11.8 |
| 1,042,325 |
| 8.9 |
|
Insurance Carriers & Related Activities |
| 38,363,491 |
| 11.3 |
| 1,196,679 |
| 10.2 |
|
Manufacturing |
| 27,458,189 |
| 8.1 |
| 915,091 |
| 7.8 |
|
Health Care & Social Assistance |
| 16,072,397 |
| 4.7 |
| 663,800 |
| 5.6 |
|
Other Professional |
| 15,420,013 |
| 4.5 |
| 472,440 |
| 4.0 |
|
Publishing Industries |
| 13,957,417 |
| 4.1 |
| 431,189 |
| 3.7 |
|
Computer System Design Svcs. |
| 13,121,158 |
| 3.9 |
| 472,148 |
| 4.0 |
|
Wholesale Trade |
| 13,087,555 |
| 3.9 |
| 738,635 |
| 6.3 |
|
Legal Services |
| 10,569,814 |
| 3.1 |
| 336,393 |
| 2.9 |
|
Advertising/Related Services |
| 8,637,528 |
| 2.5 |
| 276,876 |
| 2.4 |
|
Educational Services |
| 7,131,814 |
| 2.1 |
| 264,995 |
| 2.3 |
|
Telecommunications |
| 7,110,280 |
| 2.1 |
| 440,984 |
| 3.8 |
|
Accounting/Tax Prep. |
| 7,072,387 |
| 2.1 |
| 243,860 |
| 2.1 |
|
Real Estate & Rental & Leasing |
| 6,627,048 |
| 2.0 |
| 221,356 |
| 1.9 |
|
Management/Scientific |
| 5,416,157 |
| 1.6 |
| 185,140 |
| 1.6 |
|
Admin & Support, Waste Mgt. & Remediation Svcs. |
| 5,247,174 |
| 1.5 |
| 236,351 |
| 2.0 |
|
Architectural/Engineering |
| 4,238,760 |
| 1.2 |
| 166,967 |
| 1.4 |
|
Retail Trade |
| 3,926,950 |
| 1.2 |
| 193,230 |
| 1.6 |
|
Public Administration |
| 3,720,994 |
| 1.1 |
| 140,936 |
| 1.2 |
|
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation |
| 3,539,687 |
| 1.0 |
| 253,701 |
| 2.2 |
|
Other Services (except Public Administration) |
| 2,944,201 |
| 0.9 |
| 132,147 |
| 1.1 |
|
Construction |
| 2,801,808 |
| 0.8 |
| 138,293 |
| 1.2 |
|
Transportation |
| 2,050,136 |
| 0.6 |
| 82,231 |
| 0.7 |
|
Data Processing Services |
| 1,975,038 |
| 0.6 |
| 75,963 |
| 0.6 |
|
Mining |
| 1,919,223 |
| 0.6 |
| 57,721 |
| 0.5 |
|
Scientific Research/Developmnt |
| 1,791,019 |
| 0.5 |
| 61,333 |
| 0.5 |
|
Specialized Design Services |
| 1,692,793 |
| 0.5 |
| 60,992 |
| 0.5 |
|
Accommodation & Food Services |
| 1,312,475 |
| 0.4 |
| 52,936 |
| 0.5 |
|
Information Services |
| 1,230,649 |
| 0.4 |
| 51,373 |
| 0.4 |
|
Other |
| 2,243,418 |
| 0.6 |
| 73,409 |
| 0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
| 339,734,535 |
| 100.0 |
| 11,750,750 |
| 100.0 |
|
(a) The Company’s tenants are classified according to the U.S. Government’s North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS).
(b) Annualized base rental revenue is based on actual December 2018 billings times 12. For leases whose rent commences after January 1, 2019, annualized base rental revenue is based on the first full month’s billing times 12. As annualized base rental revenue is not derived from historical GAAP results, historical results may differ from those set forth above.
(c) Includes leases in effect as of the period end date, some of which have commencement dates in the future, and leases expiring December 31, 2018 aggregating 10,108 square feet and representing annualized base rent of $375,809 for which no new leases were signed.
(d) Includes office, office/flex, industrial/warehouse and stand-alone retail tenants only. Excludes leases for amenity, retail, parking and month-to-month tenants. Some tenants have multiple leases.
MARKET DIVERSIFICATION
The following table lists the Company’s markets, based on annualized commercial contractual base rent of the Consolidated Properties:
| Percentage Of | |||||
| Company | |||||
| Annualized Base | Annualized | Total Property | |||
| Rental Revenue | Base Rental | Size Rentable | Percentage Of | ||
| Market | ($) (a) (b) (c) | Revenue (%) | Area (b) (c) | Rentable Area (%) | |
| Jersey City, NJ | 119,195,761 | 24.1 | 4,334,714 | 17.9 | |
| Newark, NJ | |||||
| (Essex-Morris-Union Counties) | 110,195,104 | 22.3 | 5,420,940 | 22.4 | |
| Westchester-Rockland, NY | 69,084,337 | 14.0 | 3,895,912 | 16.1 | |
| Bergen-Passaic, NJ | 63,016,235 | 12.7 | 3,315,518 | 13.7 | |
| Middlesex-Somerset-Hunterdon, NJ | 29,242,482 | 5.9 | 1,316,655 | 5.4 | |
| Monmouth-Ocean, NJ | 28,543,735 | 5.8 | 1,620,863 | 6.7 | |
| Washington, DC-MD-VA-WV | 26,863,635 | 5.4 | 1,292,807 | 5.3 | |
| Trenton, NJ | 18,347,675 | 3.7 | 956,597 | 4.0 | |
| New York (Manhattan) | 17,966,697 | 3.6 | 524,476 | 2.2 | |
| Southern NJ | 7,746,322 | 1.6 | 1,260,398 | 5.2 | |
| Stamford-Norwalk, CT | 4,224,053 | 0.9 | 273,000 | 1.1 | |
| Totals | 494,426,036 | 100.0 | 24,211,880 | 100.0 | |
|
|
|
| Percentage Of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Annualized Base |
| Annualized |
| Total Property |
|
|
|
|
| Rental Revenue |
| Base Rental |
| Size Rentable |
| Percentage Of |
|
Market |
| ($) (a) (b) (c) |
| Revenue (%) |
| Area (b) (c) |
| Rentable Area (%) |
|
Jersey City, NJ |
| 123,921,192 |
| 36.5 |
| 4,884,193 |
| 33.0 |
|
Newark, NJ (Essex-Morris-Union Counties) |
| 94,560,948 |
| 27.9 |
| 3,646,430 |
| 24.6 |
|
Westchester-Rockland, NY |
| 51,202,380 |
| 15.1 |
| 2,875,512 |
| 19.4 |
|
Middlesex-Somerset-Hunterdon, NJ |
| 26,876,028 |
| 7.9 |
| 1,047,419 |
| 7.1 |
|
Monmouth-Ocean, NJ |
| 19,324,272 |
| 5.7 |
| 1,069,490 |
| 7.2 |
|
Bergen-Passaic, NJ |
| 11,063,736 |
| 3.3 |
| 616,510 |
| 4.2 |
|
Trenton, NJ |
| 8,392,644 |
| 2.5 |
| 406,335 |
| 2.7 |
|
Stamford-Norwalk, CT |
| 3,868,548 |
| 1.1 |
| 273,000 |
| 1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
| 339,209,748 |
| 100.0 |
| 14,818,889 |
| 100.0 |
|
(a) Annualized base rental revenue is based on actual December 31, 2018 billings times 12. For leases whose rent commences after January 1, 2019, annualized base rental revenue is based on the first full month’s billing times 12. As annualized base rental revenue is not derived from historical GAAP results, historical results may differ from those set forth above.
(b) Includes leases in effect as of the period end date, some of which have commencement dates in the future, and leases expiring December 31, 2018 aggregating 10,108 square feet and representing annualized base rent of $375,809 for which no new leases were signed.
(c) Includes office, office/flex, industrial/warehouse and stand-alone retail tenants only. Excludes leases for amenity, retail, parking and month-to-month tenants. Some tenants have multiple leases.
ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
There are no material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the Company’s business, to which the Company is a party or to which any of the Properties is subject.
ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
MARKET INFORMATION
The shares of the Company’sGeneral Partner’s common stock are traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “CLI.”
The following table sets forth the quarterly high, low, and closing price per share of the General Partner’s Common Stock reported on the NYSE for the years ended December 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, respectively:
| For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 | ||||||||
| High | Low | Close | ||||||
| First Quarter | $ | 20.11 | $ | 18.01 | $ | 19.28 | ||
| Second Quarter | $ | 19.73 | $ | 16.85 | $ | 18.43 | ||
| Third Quarter | $ | 21.12 | $ | 18.01 | $ | 18.88 | ||
| Fourth Quarter | $ | 24.26 | $ | 18.67 | $ | 23.35 | ||
| For the Year Ended December 31, 2014 | ||||||||
| High | Low | Close | ||||||
| First Quarter | $ | 23.23 | $ | 19.75 | $ | 20.79 | ||
| Second Quarter | $ | 22.44 | $ | 19.98 | $ | 21.48 | ||
| Third Quarter | $ | 22.05 | $ | 18.95 | $ | 19.11 | ||
| Fourth Quarter | $ | 20.11 | $ | 17.92 | $ | 19.06 |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2018
|
| High |
| Low |
| Close |
| |||
First Quarter |
| $ | 21.98 |
| $ | 15.86 |
| $ | 16.71 |
|
Second Quarter |
| $ | 20.86 |
| $ | 16.23 |
| $ | 20.28 |
|
Third Quarter |
| $ | 21.92 |
| $ | 18.92 |
| $ | 21.26 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
| $ | 22.26 |
| $ | 19.02 |
| $ | 19.59 |
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
|
| High |
| Low |
| Close |
| |||
First Quarter |
| $ | 29.70 |
| $ | 26.31 |
| $ | 26.94 |
|
Second Quarter |
| $ | 28.57 |
| $ | 25.96 |
| $ | 27.14 |
|
Third Quarter |
| $ | 27.75 |
| $ | 22.70 |
| $ | 23.71 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
| $ | 24.04 |
| $ | 21.18 |
| $ | 21.56 |
|
On February 22, 2016,15, 2019, the closing Common Stock price reported on the NYSE was $18.88$21.08 per share.
On May 18, 2015,July 10, 2018, the CompanyGeneral Partner filed with the NYSE its annual CEO Certification and Annual Written Affirmation pursuant to Section 303A.12 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual, each certifying that the CompanyGeneral Partner was in compliance with all of the listing standards of the NYSE.
HOLDERS
On February 22, 2016,15, 2019, the CompanyGeneral Partner had 373301 common shareholders of record. Thisrecord (this does not include beneficial owners for whom Cede & Co. or others act as nominee.
RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES; USES OF PROCEEDS FROM REGISTERED SECURITIES
During the three months ended December 31, 2015,2018, the CompanyGeneral Partner issued 273,29812,500 shares of common stock to holders of common units in the Operating Partnership upon the redemption of such common units in private offerings pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. The holders of the common units were limited partners of the Operating Partnership and accredited investors under Rule 501 of the Securities Act. The holders of the common units were converted into an equal number of shareseach received one share of common stock.stock for each common unit that they redeemed. The CompanyGeneral Partner has registered the resale of such shares under the Securities Act.
DIVIDENDS AND DISTRIBUTIONS
The declaration and payment of dividends and distributions will continue to be determined by the Board of Directors of the General Partner in light of conditions then existing, including the Company’s earnings, cash flows, financial condition, capital requirements, debt maturities, the availability of debt and equity capital, applicable REIT and legal restrictions and the general overall economic conditions and other factors.
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following graph compares total stockholder returns from the last five fiscal years to the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (“S&P 500”) and to the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc.’s FTSE NAREIT Equity REIT Index (“NAREIT”). The graph assumes that the value of the investment in the Company’sGeneral Partner’s Common Stock and in the S&P 500 and NAREIT indices was $100 at December 31, 20102013 and that all dividends were reinvested. The price of the Company’sGeneral Partner’s Common Stock on December 31, 20102013 (on which the graph is based) was $33.06.$21.48. The past stockholder return shown on the following graph is not necessarily indicative of future performance.
Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Total Return
| Plan Category | (a) Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options and Rights | (b) Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options and Rights | (c) Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (excluding securities reflected in column(a)) | |||||
| Equity Compensation Plans | ||||||||
| Approved by | ||||||||
| Stockholders…………………… | 1,056,213 | (2) | 17.33 | (3) | 3,416,581 | |||
| Equity Compensation Plans | ||||||||
| Not Approved by | ||||||||
| Stockholders(1)………………… | 178,039 | N/A | N/A | (4) | ||||
| Total | 1,234,252 | N/A | 3,416,581 | |||||
The following table sets forth selected financial data on a consolidated basis for the Company.General Partner. The consolidated selected operating and balance sheet data of the CompanyGeneral Partner as of December 31, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015 2014, 2013, 2012 and 2011,2014, and for the years then ended have been derived from the Company’sGeneral Partner’s financial statements for the respective periods.
| Operating Data (a) | Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
| In thousands, except per share data | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
| Total revenues | $ | 594,883 | $ | 636,799 | $ | 667,031 | $ | 650,632 | $ | 652,235 | ||||
| Property expenses (b) | $ | 246,604 | $ | 276,193 | $ | 254,474 | $ | 241,955 | $ | 248,107 | ||||
| Direct construction costs | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 14,945 | $ | 12,647 | $ | 11,458 | ||||
| Real estate services expenses | $ | 25,583 | $ | 26,136 | $ | 22,716 | $ | 3,746 | $ | 1,065 | ||||
| General and administrative (c) | $ | 49,147 | $ | 71,051 | $ | 47,040 | $ | 41,891 | $ | 35,137 | ||||
| Impairments | $ | 197,919 | $ | - | $ | 110,853 | $ | 9,845 | $ | - | ||||
| Interest expense | $ | 103,051 | $ | 112,878 | $ | 123,701 | $ | 122,039 | $ | 123,858 | ||||
| Realized gains (losses) on disposition of | ||||||||||||||
| rental property, net | $ | 53,261 | $ | 54,848 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
| Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | (142,052) | $ | 31,391 | $ | (89,686) | $ | 37,566 | $ | 59,499 | ||||
| Discontinued operations: Realized gains (losses) | ||||||||||||||
| and unrealized losses on disposition of | ||||||||||||||
| rental property and impairments, net | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 59,520 | $ | (13,175) | $ | - | ||||
| Net income (loss) available to common shareholders | $ | (125,752) | $ | 28,567 | $ | (14,909) | $ | 40,922 | $ | 69,684 | ||||
| Income (loss) from continuing operations | ||||||||||||||
| per share – basic | $ | (1.41) | $ | 0.32 | $ | (0.88) | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.59 | ||||
| Income (loss) from continuing operations | ||||||||||||||
| per share – diluted | $ | (1.41) | $ | 0.32 | $ | (0.88) | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.59 | ||||
| Net income (loss) per share – basic | $ | (1.41) | $ | 0.32 | $ | (0.17) | $ | 0.47 | $ | 0.81 | ||||
| Net income (loss) per share – diluted | $ | (1.41) | $ | 0.32 | $ | (0.17) | $ | 0.47 | $ | 0.81 | ||||
| Dividends declared per common share | $ | 0.60 | $ | 0.75 | $ | 1.35 | $ | 1.80 | $ | 1.80 | ||||
| Basic weighted average shares outstanding | 89,291 | 88,727 | 87,762 | 87,742 | 86,047 | |||||||||
| Diluted weighted average shares outstanding | 100,222 | 100,041 | 99,785 | 99,996 | 98,962 | |||||||||
| Balance Sheet Data | December 31, | |||||||||||||
| In thousands | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
| Rental property, before accumulated | ||||||||||||||
| depreciation and amortization | $ | 4,807,718 | $ | 4,958,179 | $ | 5,129,933 | $ | 5,379,436 | $ | 5,279,770 | ||||
| Total assets | $ | 4,063,490 | $ | 4,192,247 | $ | 4,515,328 | $ | 4,526,045 | $ | 4,295,759 | ||||
| Total debt (d) | $ | 2,154,920 | $ | 2,088,654 | $ | 2,362,766 | $ | 2,204,389 | $ | 1,914,215 | ||||
| Total liabilities | $ | 2,379,782 | $ | 2,310,236 | $ | 2,596,873 | $ | 2,457,538 | $ | 2,141,759 | ||||
| Total Mack-Cali Realty Corporation | ||||||||||||||
| stockholders’ equity | $ | 1,455,676 | $ | 1,624,781 | $ | 1,642,359 | $ | 1,766,974 | $ | 1,889,564 | ||||
| Total noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries | $ | 228,032 | $ | 257,230 | $ | 276,096 | $ | 301,533 | $ | 264,436 | ||||
Operating Data (a) |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| |||||||||||||
In thousands, except per share data |
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
| 2015 |
| 2014 |
| |||||
Total revenues |
| $ | 530,606 |
| $ | 616,200 |
| $ | 613,398 |
| $ | 594,883 |
| $ | 636,799 |
|
Property expenses (b) |
| $ | 206,235 |
| $ | 231,341 |
| $ | 240,957 |
| $ | 246,604 |
| $ | 276,193 |
|
Real estate services expenses |
| $ | 17,919 |
| $ | 23,394 |
| $ | 26,260 |
| $ | 25,583 |
| $ | 26,136 |
|
General and administrative (c) |
| $ | 53,988 |
| $ | 50,949 |
| $ | 51,979 |
| $ | 49,147 |
| $ | 71,051 |
|
Property Impairments |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 197,919 |
| $ | — |
|
Land impairments |
| $ | 24,566 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
Interest expense |
| $ | 83,754 |
| $ | 93,388 |
| $ | 94,889 |
| $ | 103,051 |
| $ | 112,878 |
|
Gain on change of control of interests |
| $ | 14,217 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 15,347 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
Realized gains (losses) and unrealized losses on disposition of rental property, net |
| $ | 99,436 |
| $ | 2,364 |
| $ | 109,666 |
| $ | 53,261 |
| $ | 54,848 |
|
Gain on disposition of developable land |
| $ | 30,939 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
Gain on sale of investment in unconsolidated joint venture |
| $ | — |
| $ | 23,131 |
| $ | 5,670 |
| $ | 6,448 |
| $ | — |
|
Loss from extinguishment of debt, net |
| $ | (10,750 | ) | $ | (421 | ) | $ | (30,540 | ) | $ | — |
| $ | (582 | ) |
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders |
| $ | 84,111 |
| $ | 23,185 |
| $ | 117,224 |
| $ | (125,752 | ) | $ | 28,567 |
|
Net income (loss) per share — basic |
| $ | 0.80 |
| $ | 0.06 |
| $ | 1.31 |
| $ | (1.41 | ) | $ | 0.32 |
|
Net income (loss) per share — diluted |
| $ | 0.80 |
| $ | 0.06 |
| $ | 1.30 |
| $ | (1.41 | ) | $ | 0.32 |
|
Dividends declared per common share |
| $ | 0.80 |
| $ | 0.75 |
| $ | 0.60 |
| $ | 0.60 |
| $ | 0.75 |
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
| 90,388 |
| 90,005 |
| 89,746 |
| 89,291 |
| 88,727 |
| |||||
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
| 100,724 |
| 100,703 |
| 100,498 |
| 100,222 |
| 100,041 |
| |||||
Balance Sheet Data (a) |
| December 31, |
| |||||||||||||
In thousands |
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
| 2015 |
| 2014 |
| |||||
Rental property, before accumulated depreciation and amortization |
| $ | 5,306,017 |
| $ | 5,102,844 |
| $ | 4,804,867 |
| $ | 4,807,718 |
| $ | 4,958,179 |
|
Total assets |
| $ | 5,060,644 |
| $ | 4,957,885 |
| $ | 4,296,766 |
| $ | 4,053,963 |
| $ | 4,182,933 |
|
Total debt (d) |
| $ | 2,792,651 |
| $ | 2,809,568 |
| $ | 2,340,009 |
| $ | 2,145,393 |
| $ | 2,079,340 |
|
Total liabilities |
| $ | 3,033,004 |
| $ | 3,076,954 |
| $ | 2,570,079 |
| $ | 2,370,255 |
| $ | 2,300,922 |
|
Redeemable noncontrolling interests |
| $ | 330,459 |
| $ | 212,208 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
Total Mack-Cali Realty Corporation stockholders’ equity |
| $ | 1,486,658 |
| $ | 1,476,295 |
| $ | 1,527,171 |
| $ | 1,455,676 |
| $ | 1,624,781 |
|
Total noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries |
| $ | 210,523 |
| $ | 192,428 |
| $ | 199,516 |
| $ | 228,032 |
| $ | 257,230 |
|
(a) Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts in order to conform with current period presentation.
(b) Property expenses is calculated by taking the sum of real estate taxes, utilities and operating services for each of the periods presented.
(c) Amount for the year ended December 31, 2018 includes $6.5 million of severance and related expenses related to executive management and other personnel changes during the year. Amount for the year ended December 31, 2014 includes $23.8 million of severance costs related to the departure of the Company’s former chief executive officer and certain of the other executive officers in 2014.
(d) Total debt is calculated by taking the sum of senior unsecured notes, unsecured revolving credit facility and term loans, and mortgages, loans payable and other obligations, net.
The following table sets forth selected financial data on a consolidated basis for the Operating Partnership. The consolidated selected operating and balance sheet data of the Operating Partnership as of December 31, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014, and for the years then ended have been derived from the Operating Partnership’s financial statements for the respective periods.
Operating Data (a) |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| |||||||||||||
In thousands, except per unit data |
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
| 2015 |
| 2014 |
| |||||
Total revenues |
| $ | 530,606 |
| $ | 616,200 |
| $ | 613,398 |
| $ | 594,883 |
| $ | 636,799 |
|
Property expenses (b) |
| $ | 206,235 |
| $ | 231,341 |
| $ | 240,957 |
| $ | 246,604 |
| $ | 276,193 |
|
Real estate services expenses |
| $ | 17,919 |
| $ | 23,394 |
| $ | 26,260 |
| $ | 25,583 |
| $ | 26,136 |
|
General and administrative (c) |
| $ | 53,988 |
| $ | 50,949 |
| $ | 51,979 |
| $ | 49,147 |
| $ | 71,051 |
|
Property Impairments |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 197,919 |
| $ | — |
|
Land impairments |
| $ | 24,566 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
Interest expense |
| $ | 83,754 |
| $ | 93,388 |
| $ | 94,889 |
| $ | 103,051 |
| $ | 112,878 |
|
Gain on change of control of interests |
| $ | 14,217 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 15,347 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
Realized gains (losses) and unrealized losses on disposition of rental property, net |
| $ | 99,436 |
| $ | 2,364 |
| $ | 109,666 |
| $ | 53,261 |
| $ | 54,848 |
|
Gain on disposition of developable land |
| $ | 30,939 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
Gain on sale of investment in unconsolidated joint venture |
| $ | — |
| $ | 23,131 |
| $ | 5,670 |
| $ | 6,448 |
| $ | — |
|
Loss from extinguishment of debt, net |
| $ | (10,750 | ) | $ | (421 | ) | $ | (30,540 | ) | $ | — |
| $ | (582 | ) |
Net income (loss) available to common unitholders |
| $ | 93,638 |
| $ | 25,896 |
| $ | 130,945 |
| $ | (141,008 | ) | $ | 32,169 |
|
Net income (loss) per unit — basic |
| $ | 0.80 |
| $ | 0.06 |
| $ | 1.31 |
| $ | (1.41 | ) | $ | 0.32 |
|
Net income (loss) per unit — diluted |
| $ | 0.80 |
| $ | 0.06 |
| $ | 1.30 |
| $ | (1.41 | ) | $ | 0.32 |
|
Distributions declared per common unit |
| $ | 0.80 |
| $ | 0.75 |
| $ | 0.60 |
| $ | 0.60 |
| $ | 0.75 |
|
Basic weighted average units outstanding |
| 100,634 |
| 100,410 |
| 100,245 |
| 100,222 |
| 99,999 |
| |||||
Diluted weighted average units outstanding |
| 100,724 |
| 100,703 |
| 100,498 |
| 100,222 |
| 100,041 |
| |||||
Balance Sheet Data (a) |
| December 31, |
| |||||||||||||
In thousands |
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
| 2015 |
| 2014 |
| |||||
Rental property, before accumulated depreciation and amortization |
| $ | 5,306,017 |
| $ | 5,102,844 |
| $ | 4,804,867 |
| $ | 4,807,718 |
| $ | 4,958,179 |
|
Total assets |
| $ | 5,060,644 |
| $ | 4,957,885 |
| $ | 4,296,766 |
| $ | 4,053,963 |
| $ | 4,182,933 |
|
Total debt (d) |
| $ | 2,792,651 |
| $ | 2,809,568 |
| $ | 2,340,009 |
| $ | 2,145,393 |
| $ | 2,079,340 |
|
Total liabilities |
| $ | 3,033,004 |
| $ | 3,076,954 |
| $ | 2,570,079 |
| $ | 2,370,255 |
| $ | 2,300,922 |
|
Redeemable noncontrolling interests |
| $ | 330,459 |
| $ | 212,208 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
Total equity |
| $ | 1,697,181 |
| $ | 1,668,723 |
| $ | 1,726,687 |
| $ | 1,683,708 |
| $ | 1,882,011 |
|
(a) Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts in order to conform with current period presentation.
(b) Property expenses is calculated by taking the sum of real estate taxes, utilities and operating services for each of the periods presented.
(c) Amount for the year ended December 31, 2018 includes $6.5 million of severance and related expenses related to executive management and other personnel changes during the year. Amount for the year ended December 31, 2014 includes $23.8 million of severance costs related to the departure of the Company’s former chief executive officer and of certain of the other executive officers in 2014.
(d) Total debt is calculated by taking the sum of senior unsecured notes, unsecured revolving credit facility and term loans, and mortgages, loans payable and other obligations, net.
ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. and the notes thereto (collectively, the “Financial Statements”). Certain defined terms used herein have the meaning ascribed to them in the Financial Statements.
Executive Overview
Mack-Cali Realty Corporation together with its subsidiaries, (collectively, the “General Partner”), including Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. (the “Company”“Operating Partnership”), has been involved in all aspects of commercial real estate development, management and ownership for over 60 years and the General Partner has been a publicly-tradedpublicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) since 1994.
The Operating Partnership conducts the business of providing leasing, management, acquisition, development, construction and tenant-related services for its General Partner. The Operating Partnership, through its operating divisions and subsidiaries, including the Mack-Cali property-owning partnerships and limited liability companies, is the entity through which all of the General Partner’s operations are conducted. Unless stated otherwise or the context requires, the “Company” refers to the General Partner and its subsidiaries, including the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries. The Company owns or has interests in 275135 properties (collectively, the “Properties”), consisting of 14756 office and 10955 flex properties, primarily class A office and office/flex buildings, totaling approximately 29.915.4 million square feet which are leased to approximately 1,900700 commercial tenants and 1924 multi-family rental properties containing 5,644 residential6,910 apartment units. The Properties are located primarily in the Northeast, some with adjacent, Company-controlled developable land sites able to accommodate up to 5.3approximately 3.4 million square feet of additional commercial space and approximately 11,30010,000 apartment units.
The Company’s historical strategy has been to focus its operations, acquisition and development of office properties in high-barrier-to-entry markets and sub-markets where it believes it is, or can become, a significant and preferred owner and operator. In September 2015, the Company announced a three-year strategic initiative to transform into a more concentrated owner of New Jersey Hudson River waterfront and transit-oriented office properties and a regional owner of luxury multi-family residential properties. In furtherance of this strategy, the Company has commenced a comprehensive review of its portfolio and operations and is developing a business strategy that focuses on reshaping its portfolio over time. As part of this plan, over the past three years, the Company anticipates thathas sold or has contracted to sell multiple properties, primarily commercial office, which it may dispose of a significant number of its properties thatbelieves do not meet its long-term goals, and, in September 2015, compiled a list of its properties that it considers as non-core to its ongoing operations. Specifically, the Company considers a non-core property to have one or more of the following attributes: (1) assets that do not offer an opportunity to create a competitive advantage; (2) assets that produce a low cash yield; (3) assets which have physical attributes that constrain their market competitiveness; and (4) assets located in low growth markets. The Company believes that the potential sales of these non-core properties over time would result in total estimated sales proceeds ranging from approximately $600 million to $800 million.
As an owner of real estate, almost all of the Company’s earnings and cash flow are derived from rental revenue received pursuant to leased space at the Properties. Key factors that affect the Company’s business and financial results include the following:
· the general economic climate;
· the occupancy rates of the Properties;
· rental rates on new or renewed leases;
· tenant improvement and leasing costs incurred to obtain and retain tenants;
· the extent of early lease terminations;
· the value of our office properties and the cash flow from the sale of such properties;
· operating expenses;
· anticipated acquisition and development costs for office and multi-family rental properties and the revenues and earnings from these properties;
· cost of capital; and
· the extent of acquisitions, development and sales of real estate, including the execution of the Company’s current strategic initiative.
Any negative effects of the above key factors could potentially cause a deterioration in the Company’s revenue and/or earnings. Such negative effects could include: (1) failure to renew or execute new leases as current leases expire; (2) failure to renew or execute new leases with rental terms at or above the terms of in-place leases; and (3) tenant defaults.
A failure to renew or execute new leases as current leases expire or to execute new leases with rental terms at or above the terms of in-place leases may be affected by several factors such as: (1) the local economic climate, which may be adversely impacted by business layoffs or downsizing, industry slowdowns, changing demographics and other factors; and (2) local real estate conditions, such as oversupply of the Company’s product types or competition within the market.
Of the Company’s 10 core office markets, several have recently shownmost continue to show signs of rental rate improvement, while others havethe lease percentage has declined or stabilized. The percentage leased in the Company’s consolidated portfolio of stabilized core operating commercial properties
aggregating 2414.1 million, 2514.7 million and 2820.9 million square feet at December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013,2016, respectively, was 86.283.2 percent leased at December 31, 2015,2018, as compared to 84.287.6 percent leased at December 31, 20142017 and 86.190.6 percent leased at December 31, 2013.2016 (after adjusting for properties identified as non-core at the time). Percentage leased includes all leases in effect as of the period end date, some of which have commencement dates in the future and leases that expire at the period end date. Leases that expired as of December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016 aggregate 69,522, 205,22010,108, 343,217 and 690,895151,655 square feet, respectively, or 0.3, 0.80.1, 2.3 and 2.50.7 percentage of the net rentable square footage, respectively. Rental rates (including escalations) on the Company’s commercial space that was renewed (based on first rents payable) during the year ended December 31, 20152018 (on 2,513,087950,548 square feet of renewals) increased an average of 0.221.7 percent compared to rates that were in effect under the prior leases, as compared to a 4.71.7 percent decreaseincrease during 20142017 (on 1,649,1451,680,687 square feet of renewals) and a 7.110.9 percent decreaseincrease in 20132016 (on 2,420,4831,559,046 square feet of renewals). Estimated lease costs for the renewed leases in 20152018 averaged $2.85$3.46 per square foot per year for a weighted average lease term of 3.64.7 years, estimated lease costs for the renewed leases in 20142017 averaged $2.33$2.16 per square foot per year for a weighted average lease term of 4.07.2 years and estimated lease costs for the renewed leases in 20132016 averaged $2.22$4.04 per square foot per year for a weighted average lease term of 3.85.1 years. The Company has achieved positive leasing results in its core markets recently. It believes that commercial vacancy rates may decreaseat its commercial properties have begun to bottom by the end of 2018 as the majority of the known move-outs at its waterfront portfolio have already occurred, and commercial rental rates may increase in some of its markets in 2016 and possibly beyond.2019. As of December 31, 2015,2018, commercial leases which comprise approximately 7.39.9 and 18.35.6 percent of the Company’s annualized base rent are scheduled to expire during the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 2017,2020, respectively. With the positive leasingrental rate results the Company has achieved in manymost of its markets recently, the Company believes that rental rates it is likely to achieve on new leases will generally be, on average, not lower than rates currently being paid. Although the Company has recently achieved positive leasing activity, primarily in its core markets, if theIf these recent leasing results do not prove to be sustaining during 2016 and beyond,in 2019, the Company’s rental rates itCompany may achieve on new leases may be lower than the rates currently being paid, resulting in the potential forreceive less revenue from the same space.
During 2017, Moody’s downgraded its strategic initiative described above,investment grade rating on the Company may dispose of properties it considers non-core,Company’s senior unsecured debt to sub-investment grade and it may actively asset manage other low-growth real estate assets in a different way. The Company will selectively purchase assets in markets that it believes will offer above market returns. The Company believes that the opportunity to invest in multi-family development properties at higher returns on cost will position the Company to potentially produce higher levels of net operating income than if the Company were to only purchase stabilized multi-family rental properties at market returns. The Company anticipates that it will be several years before many of its multi-family development projects are income-producing.
The remaining portion of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should help the reader understand our:
· recent transactions; · critical accounting policies and estimates; · results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2017; · results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016; and · liquidity and capital resources.
| |
Acquisitions
On February 6, 2019, the Company completed the acquisition of a 271,988 square foot office property located in Iselin, New Jersey, for a purchase price of $61.5 million, which was funded using funds available with the Company’s qualified intermediary and borrowings under the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility.
On January 5, 2016,25, 2019, the Company signed an agreement to acquire a 377-unit multi-family rental property located in Jersey City, New Jersey for approximately $264 million, subject to certain conditions. The acquisition is expected to be completed in the second quarter 2019.
Properties Commencing Initial Operations:
The following properties commenced initial operations during the year ended December 31, 2018 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| # of |
| Total |
| |
In-Service |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Apartment Units/ |
| Development |
| |
Date |
| Property |
| Location |
| Type |
| Rooms |
| Costs Incurred |
| |
03/01/18 |
| 145 Front at City Square |
| Worcester, MA |
| Multi-Family |
| 365 |
| $ | 97,483 | (a) |
04/01/18 |
| Signature Place at Morris Plains |
| Morris Plains, NJ |
| Multi-Family |
| 197 |
| 56,715 | (b) | |
05/01/18 |
| Portside 5/6 |
| East Boston, MA |
| Multi-Family |
| 296 |
| 114,694 | (c) | |
08/01/18 |
| RiverHouse 11 at Port Imperial |
| Weehawken, NJ |
| Multi-Family |
| 295 |
| 130,369 | (d) | |
12/13/18 |
| Residence Inn By Marriott (Phase I) |
| Weehawken, NJ |
| Hotel |
| 164 |
| 58,723 | (e) | |
Totals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1,317 |
| $ | 457,984 |
|
(a) Development costs as of December 31, 2018 included approximately $4.4 in land costs. As of December 31, 2018, the Company anticipates additional costs of approximately $1.1 million, which will be primarily funded from a construction loan.
(b) Development costs as of December 31, 2018 included approximately $0.9 in land costs.
(c) As of December 31, 2018, the Company anticipates additional costs of approximately $0.7 million, which will be funded by the Company.
(d) As of December 31, 2018, the Company anticipates additional costs of $1.2 million which will be funded by the Company.
(e) As of December 31, 2018, the Company anticipates additional costs of $20.1 million which will be funded from a construction loan.
Consolidations:
On August 2, 2018, the Company, which held a 5024.27 percent subordinated interest in the property-owning entity, Overlook Ridge Apartment Investorsunconsolidated joint venture Marbella Tower Urban Renewal Associates LLC, acquired its remaining interest in a 371-unit412-unit multi-family operating property located in Malden, Massachusetts for $39.8 million.
Land and leasehold interest |
| $ | 48,820 |
|
Buildings and improvements and other assets, net |
| 162,958 |
| |
In-place lease values (a) |
| 6,947 |
| |
Less: Below market lease values (a) |
| (108 | ) | |
|
| 218,617 |
| |
Less: Debt |
| (131,000 | ) | |
Net Assets |
| 87,617 |
| |
Less: Noncontrolling interest (b) |
| (22,812 | ) | |
Net assets recorded upon consolidation |
| $ | 64,805 |
|
.(a) In-place and below market leases are being amortized over a weighted-average term of 9.3 months.
(b)
Dispositions/Rental Property Held for Sale:
The Company disposed of the following office properties during the year ended December 31, 2015 2018 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Realized |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Gains |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Rentable |
| Net |
| Net |
| (losses)/ |
| |||
Disposition |
|
|
|
|
| # of |
| Square |
| Sales |
| Carrying |
| Unrealized |
| |||
Date |
| Property/Address |
| Location |
| Bldgs. |
| Feet |
| Proceeds |
| Value |
| Losses, net |
| |||
02/15/18 |
| 35 Waterview Boulevard (a) |
| Parsippany, New Jersey |
| 1 |
| 172,498 |
| $ | 25,994 |
| $ | 25,739 |
| $ | 255 |
|
03/05/18 |
| Hamilton portfolio (b) |
| Hamilton, New Jersey |
| 6 |
| 239,262 |
| 17,546 |
| 17,501 |
| 45 |
| |||
03/07/18 |
| Wall portfolio first closing |
| Wall, New Jersey |
| 5 |
| 179,601 |
| 14,053 |
| 10,526 |
| 3,527 |
| |||
03/22/18 |
| 700 Horizon Drive |
| Hamilton, New Jersey |
| 1 |
| 120,000 |
| 33,020 |
| 16,053 |
| 16,967 |
| |||
03/23/18 |
| Wall portfolio second closing |
| Wall, New Jersey |
| 3 |
| 217,822 |
| 30,209 |
| 12,961 |
| 17,248 |
| |||
03/28/18 |
| 75 Livingston Avenue |
| Roseland, New Jersey |
| 1 |
| 94,221 |
| 7,983 |
| 5,609 |
| 2,374 |
| |||
03/28/18 |
| 20 Waterview Boulevard (c) |
| Parsippany, New Jersey |
| 1 |
| 225,550 |
| 12,475 |
| 11,795 |
| 680 |
| |||
03/30/18 |
| Westchester Financial Center (d) |
| White Plains, New York |
| 2 |
| 489,000 |
| 81,769 |
| 64,679 |
| 17,090 |
| |||
06/27/18 |
| 65 Jackson Drive |
| Cranford, New Jersey |
| 0 |
| — |
| 1,510 | (e) | — |
| 1,510 |
| |||
08/02/18 |
| 600 Horizon Drive |
| Hamilton, New Jersey |
| 1 |
| 95,000 |
| 15,127 |
| 6,191 |
| 8,936 |
| |||
09/05/18 |
| 1 & 3 Barker Avenue |
| White Plains, New York |
| 2 |
| 133,300 |
| 15,140 |
| 13,543 |
| 1,597 |
| |||
11/15/18 |
| 120 Passaic Street (f) |
| Rochelle Park, New Jersey |
| 1 |
| 52,000 |
| 2,667 |
| 2,568 |
| 99 |
| |||
12/31/18 |
| Elmsford Distribution Center |
| Elmsford, New York |
| 6 |
| 387,400 |
| 66,557 |
| 17,314 |
| 49,243 |
| |||
Sub-total |
|
|
|
|
| 30 |
| 2,405,654 |
| 324,050 |
| 204,479 |
| 119,571 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Unrealized losses on rental property held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (20,135 | ) | |||||||
Totals |
|
|
|
|
| 30 |
| 2,405,654 |
| $ | 324,050 |
| $ | 204,479 |
| $ | 99,436 |
|
| Rentable | Net | Net | ||||||||||||
| Disposition | # of | Square | Sales | Book | Realized | |||||||||
| Date | Property/Address | Location | Bldgs. | Feet | Proceeds | Value | Gain | |||||||
| 01/15/15 | 1451 Metropolitan Drive | West Deptford, New Jersey | 1 | 21,600 | $ | 1,072 | $ | 929 | $ | 143 | ||||
| 05/27/15 | 10 Independence Blvd | Warren, New Jersey | 1 | 120,528 | 18,351 | (a) | 15,114 | 3,237 | ||||||
| 06/11/15 | 4 Sylvan Way | Parsippany, New Jersey | 1 | 105,135 | 15,961 | (a) | 9,522 | 6,439 | ||||||
| 06/26/15 | 14 Sylvan Way | Parsippany, New Jersey | 1 | 203,506 | 79,977 | 55,253 | 24,724 | |||||||
| 07/21/15 | 210 Clay Ave | Lyndhurst, New Jersey | 1 | 121,203 | 14,766 | (a) | 5,202 | 9,564 | ||||||
| 08/24/15 | 5 Becker Farm Rd | Roseland, New Jersey | 1 | 118,343 | 18,129 | (a) | 8,975 | 9,154 | ||||||
| Totals | 6 | 690,315 | $ | 148,256 | $ | 94,995 | $ | 53,261 | ||||||
| (a) The Company transferred the deeds for these properties to the lender in satisfaction of its mortgage loan obligations totaling $59.7 million. The Company recorded an impairment charge of $25.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2013 as it estimated that the carrying value of the properties may not be recoverable over their anticipated holding periods. | ||||||||||||||
(a) The Company adopted the new discontinued operations accounting standard and as the properties disposedrecorded a valuation allowance of $0.7 million on this property during the year ended December 31, 2015 did not represent2017.
(b) The Company recorded a strategic shift (asvaluation allowance of $0.6 million on these properties during the year ended December 31, 2017. The disposition additionally included two land properties.
(c) The Company recorded a valuation allowance of $11 million on this property during the year ended December 31, 2017. Prior to closing, the Company is not entirely exiting markets or property types), they have not been reflected as partprovided short term financing through a note receivable to an affiliate of discontinued operations.
(d) Prior to closing, the Company announcedprovided financing through a three-year strategic initiativenote receivable to transform the Company into a more concentrated owner of New Jersey Hudson River waterfront and transit-oriented office properties and a regional owner of luxury multi-family residential properties. In connection with the transformationan affiliate of the Company’s portfolio, management began developing a disposition planbuyers of $4.0 million. The note was paid off in September 2015, which will be an ongoing assessment process. Through this plan,October 2018.
(e) Represents the receipt by the Company in the coming years, expectssecond quarter 2018 of variable contingent sales consideration, net of costs, of $1.5 million subsequent to disposedisposition of primarilythe property sold in January 2017.
(f) The net sale proceeds were held by a qualified intermediary, which is noncash and recorded in deferred charges, goodwill and other assets as of December 31, 2018. See Note 5: Deferred Charges, Goodwill and Other Assets, Net).
The Company disposed of the following developable land holding during the year ended December 31, 2018 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
| Net |
| Net |
| Gain on |
| |||
Disposition |
|
|
|
|
| Sales |
| Carrying |
| Disposition of |
| |||
Date |
| Property Address |
| Location |
| Proceeds |
| Value |
| Developable Land |
| |||
12/31/18 |
| One Lake Street |
| Upper Saddle River, New Jersey (a) |
| $ | 46,036 |
| $ | 15,097 |
| $ | 30,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Totals |
|
|
|
|
| $ | 46,036 |
| $ | 15,097 |
| $ | 30,939 |
|
(a) The net sale proceeds were held by a qualified intermediary, which is noncash and recorded in deferred charges, goodwill and other assets as of December 31, 2018. See Note 5: Deferred Charges, Goodwill and Other Assets, Net. The net carrying value includes $3 million of development costs funded at the closing.
The Company identified as held for sale six office properties considered non-coretotaling approximately 845,000 square feet and a 159 unit multi-family rental property as of December 31, 2018. The properties are located in Fort Lee, Newark, Paramus, Bridgewater, Morris Plains and Rahway, New Jersey. The total estimated sales proceeds, net of expected selling costs, from the sales are expected to its ongoing operations. As a result, at September 30, 2015,be approximately $124 million. The Company determined that the carrying value of four of the properties was not expected to be recovered from estimated net sales proceeds and accordingly recognized an unrealized loss allowance of $20.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2018. In January 2019, the Company evaluatedcompleted the recoverabilitydisposition of the carrying valuesthree of these non-core properties for sales proceeds of approximately $54.5 million.
Land Impairments:
The Company owns two separate developable land parcels in Conshohocken and determinedBala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, that duewere being considered for development into multi-family rental properties. During the fourth quarter 2018, the Company made the decision to pursue selling the land parcels rather than developing them. Due to the shortening of the expected periods of ownership, the Company determined that it was necessary to reduce the carrying values of 22 rental properties to their estimated fair values. Accordingly, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $158.6 million at September 30, 2015 reducing the aggregate carrying values of these properties from $554.3 millionland parcels to their estimated fair values (ascertained by broker opinions of $395.7 million. Atvalue obtained during the marketing process) and recorded total land impairments charges of $24.6 million at December 31, 2015,2018
Unconsolidated Joint Venture Activity:
On January 31, 2019, the Company, which held a 24.27 percent subordinated interest in the unconsolidated joint venture, Marbella Tower Urban Renewal Associates South LLC (“Marbella II”), a 311-unit multi-family operating property located in Jersey City, New Jersey, acquired its equity partner’s 50 percent interest for $77.5 million in cash. The acquisition was funded primarily using available cash. Concurrently with the closing, the joint venture repaid in full the property’s $74.7 million mortgage loan and obtained a new loan in the amount of $117 million.
On December 11, 2018, the Company acquired one of its partner’s interest in the Metropolitan and Shops at 40 Park and the Lofts at 40 Park for $1.3 million and as a result, ofincreased its periodic evaluation ofownership from 12.5 percent interest to 25 percent interest in the recoverability ofMetropolitan and Shops at 40 Park and from 25 percent interest to 50 percent interest in the carrying values resulting from its ongoing assessment of non-core properties, the Company recorded an additional impairment charge of $33.7 million.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include all accounts of the Company, its majority-owned and/or controlled subsidiaries, which consist principally of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”),the Operating Partnership and variable interest entities for which the Company has determined itself to be the primary beneficiary, if any. See Note 2: Significant Accounting Policies – Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures – to the Financial Statements, for the Company’s treatment of unconsolidated joint venture interests. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 810, Consolidation, provides guidance on the identification of entities for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights (“variable interest entities” or “VIEs”) and the determination of which business enterprise, if any, should consolidate the VIEs. Generally, the consideration of whether an entity is a VIE applies when either: (1) the equity investors (if any) lack (i) the ability to make decisions about the entity'sentity’s activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; (2) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support; or (3) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportionate to their economic interests and substantially all of the activities of the entity involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor with a disproportionately small voting interest. The Company consolidates VIEs in which it is considered to be the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary is defined by the entity having both of the following characteristics: (1) the power to direct the activities that, when taken together, most significantly impact the variable interest entity’s performance: and (2) the obligation to absorb losses and right to receive the returns from the VIE that would be significant to the VIE.
On January 1, 2016, the Company adopted accounting guidance under ASC 810, Consolidation, modifying the analysis it must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. The guidance does not amend the existing disclosure requirements for variable interest entities or voting interest model entities. The guidance, however, modified the requirements to qualify under the voting interest model. Under the revised guidance, the Operating Partnership will be a variable interest entity of the parent company, Mack-Cali Realty Corporation. As the Operating Partnership is already consolidated in the balance sheets of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation, the identification of this entity as a variable interest entity has no impact on the consolidated financial statements of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation. There were no other legal entities qualifying under the scope of the revised guidance that were consolidated as a result of the adoption.
The Financial Statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Financial Statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts in order to conform with current period presentation. These estimates and assumptions are based on management’s historical experience that are believed to be reasonable at the time. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, the determination of estimates requires the exercise of judgment. The Company’s critical accounting policies are those which require assumptions to be made about matters that are highly uncertain. Different estimates could have a material effect on the Company’s financial results. Judgments and uncertainties affecting the application of these policies and estimates may result in materially different amounts being reported under different conditions and circumstances.
Rental Property:
Rental properties are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Costs directly related to the acquisition, development and construction of rental properties are capitalized. Acquisition-related costs arewere expensed as incurred.incurred through December 31, 2016. The Company early adopted FASB guidance Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-01 on January 1, 2017, which revises the definition of a business and is expected to result in more transactions to be accounted for as asset acquisitions and significantly limit transactions that would be accounted for as business combinations. Where an acquisition has been determined to be an asset acquisition, acquisition-related costs are capitalized. Capitalized development and construction costs include pre-construction costs essential to the development of the property, development and construction costs, interest, property taxes, insurance, salaries and other project costs incurred during the period of development. Interest capitalized by the Company for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016 was $16.2$27.0 million, $15.5$20.2 million and $12.9$19.3 million, respectively. Ordinary repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred; major replacements and betterments, which improve or extend the life of the asset, are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Fully-depreciated assets are removed from the accounts.
The Company considers a construction project as substantially completed and held available for occupancy upon the substantial completion of tenant improvements, but no later than one year from cessation of major construction activity (as distinguished from activities
such as routine maintenance and cleanup). If portions of a rental project are substantially completed and occupied by tenants or residents, or held available for occupancy, and other portions have not yet reached that stage, the substantially completed portions are accounted for as a separate project. The Company allocates costs incurred between the portions under construction and the portions substantially completed and held available for occupancy, primarily based on a percentage of the relative commercial square footage or multi-family units of each portion, and capitalizes only those costs associated with the portion under construction.
Properties are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful lives are as follows:
Leasehold interests | Remaining lease term | ||
Buildings and improvements | 5 to 40 years | ||
Tenant improvements | The shorter of the term of the | ||
| related lease or useful life | |||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment | 5 to 10 years |
Upon acquisition of rental property, the Company estimates the fair value of acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities assumed, generally consisting of the fair value of (i) above and below market leases, (ii) in-place leases and (iii) tenant relationships. The Company allocates the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values. The Company records goodwill or a gain on bargain purchase (if any) if the net assets acquired/liabilities assumed exceeddiffer from the purchase consideration of a business transaction. In estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired, the Company considers information obtained about each property as a result of its due diligence and marketing and leasing activities, and utilizes various valuation methods, such as estimated cash flow projections utilizing appropriate discount and capitalization rates, estimates of replacement costs net of depreciation, and available market information. The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property considers the value of the property as if it were vacant.
Above-market and below-market lease values for acquired properties are initially recorded based on the present value (using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to each in-place lease and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for each corresponding in-place lease, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above-market leases and the remaining initial term plus the term of any below-market fixed rate renewal options for below-market leases. The capitalized above-market lease values are amortized as a reduction of base rental revenue over the remaining terms of the respective leases, and the capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to base rental revenue over the remaining initial terms plus the terms of any below-market fixed rate renewal options of the respective leases.
Other intangible assets acquired include amounts for in-place lease values and tenant relationship values, which are based on management’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and the Company’s overall relationship with the respective tenant. Factors to be considered by management in its analysis of in-place lease values include an estimate of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions, and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, management includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up periods, depending on local market conditions. In estimating costs to execute similar leases, management considers leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses. Characteristics considered by management in valuing tenant relationships include the nature and extent of the Company’s existing business relationships with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenant’s credit quality and expectations of lease renewals. The value of in-place leases are amortized to expense over the remaining initial terms of the respective leases. The value of tenant relationship intangibles are amortized to expense over the anticipated life of the relationships.
On a periodic basis, management assesses whether there are any indicators that the value of the Company’s rental properties held for use may be impaired. In addition to identifying any specific circumstances which may affect a property or properties, management considers other criteria for determining which properties may require assessment for potential impairment. The criteria considered by management include reviewing low leased percentages, significant near-term lease expirations, recently acquired properties, current and historical operating and/or cash flow losses, near-term mortgage debt maturities and/or other factors, including those that might impact the Company’s intent and ability to hold the property. A property’s value is impaired only if management’s estimate of the aggregate future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) to be generated by the property is less than the carrying value of the property. To the extent impairment has occurred, the impairment loss shall be measured as the excess of the carrying value of the property over the fair value of the property. The Company’s estimates of aggregate future cash flows expected to be generated by each property are based on a number of assumptions. These assumptions are generally based on management’s experience in its local real estate markets and the effects of current market conditions. The assumptions are subject to economic and market uncertainties including, among others,
demand for space, competition for tenants, changes in market rental rates, and costs to operate each property. As these factors are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may alter management’s assumptions, the future cash flows estimated by management in its impairment analyses may not be achieved, and actual losses or impairments may be realized in the future. See Note 3: Recent Transactions – Impairments on Properties Held and Used – to the Financial Statements.
Rental Property Held for Sale:
When assets are identified by management as held for sale, the Company discontinues depreciating the assets and estimates the sales price, net of selling costs, of such assets. The Company generally considers assets to be held for sale when the transaction has received appropriate corporate authority and there are no significant contingencies relating to the sale. If, in management’s opinion, the estimated net sales price, net of selling costs, of the assets which have been identified as held for sale is less than the net bookcarrying value of the assets, a valuation allowance (which is recorded as unrealized losses on disposition of rental property) is established.
If circumstances arise that previously were considered unlikely and, as a result, the Company decides not to sell a property previously classified as held for sale, the property is reclassified as held and used. A property that is reclassified is measured and recorded individually at the lower of (a) its carrying value before the property was classified as held for sale, adjusted for any depreciation (amortization) expense that would have been recognized had the property been continuously classified as held and used, or (b) the fair value at the date of the subsequent decision not to sell.
Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures:
The Company accounts for its investments in unconsolidated joint ventures under the equity method of accounting. The Company applies the equity method by initially recording these investments at cost, as Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures, subsequently adjusted for equity in earnings and cash contributions and distributions. The outside basis portion of the Company’s joint ventures is amortized over the anticipated useful lives of the underlying ventures’ tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Generally, the Company would discontinue applying the equity method when the investment (and any advances) is reduced to zero and would not provide for additional losses unless the Company has guaranteed obligations of the venture or is otherwise committed to providing further financial support for the investee. If the venture subsequently generates income, the Company only recognizes its share of such income to the extent it exceeds its share of previously unrecognized losses.
If the venture subsequently makes distributions and the Company does not have an implied or actual commitment to support the operations of the venture, including a general partner interest in the investee, the Company will not record a basis less than zero, rather such amounts will be recorded as equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures.
On a periodic basis, management assesses whether there are any indicators that the value of the Company’s investments in unconsolidated joint ventures may be impaired. An investment is impaired only if management’s estimate of the value of the investment is less than the carrying value of the investment, and such decline in value is deemed to be other than temporary. To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss shall be measured as the excess of the carrying value of the investment over the value of the investment. The Company’s estimates of value for each investment (particularly in real estate joint ventures) are based on a number of assumptions that are subject to economic and market uncertainties including, among others, demand for space, competition for tenants, changes in market rental rates, and operating costs. As these factors are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may alter management’s assumptions, the values estimated by management in its impairment analyses may not be realized, and actual losses or impairment may be realized in the future. See Note 4: Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures –— to the Financial Statements.
Revenue Recognition:
Base rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases. Unbilled rents receivable represents the cumulative amount by which straight-line rental revenue exceeds rents currently billed in accordance with the lease agreements.
Above-market and below-market lease values for acquired properties are initially recorded based on the present value (using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to each in-place lease and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for each corresponding in-place lease, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above-market leases and the remaining initial term plus the term of any below-market fixed-rate renewal options for below-market leases. The capitalized above-market lease values for acquired properties are amortized as a reduction of base rental revenue over the remaining terms of the respective leases, and the capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to base rental revenue over the remaining initial terms plus the terms of any below-market fixed-rate renewal options of the respective leases.
Escalations and recoveries from tenants are received from tenants for certain costs as provided in the lease agreements. These costs generally include real estate taxes, utilities, insurance, common area maintenance and other recoverable costs.
Real estate services revenue includes property management, development, construction and leasing commission fees and other services, and payroll and related costs reimbursed from clients. Fee income derived from the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures (which are capitalized by such ventures) are recognized to the extent attributable to the unaffiliated ownership interests.
Parking income includes income from parking spaces leased to tenants and others.
Other income includes income from tenants for additional services arranged for by the Company and income from tenants for early lease terminations.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:
Management performs a detailed review of amounts due from tenants to determine if an allowance for doubtful accounts is required based on factors affecting the collectability of the accounts receivable balances. The factors considered by management in determining which individual tenant receivable balances, or aggregate receivable balances, require a collectability allowance include the age of the receivable, the tenant’s payment history, the nature of the charges, any communications regarding the charges and other related information. Management’s estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts requires management to exercise significant judgment about the timing, frequency and severity of collection losses, which affects the allowance and net income.
Discontinued OperationsRedeemable Noncontrolling Interests:
The Company evaluates the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)terms of the partnership units issued guidance relatedin accordance with the FASB’s Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity guidance. Units which embody an unconditional obligation requiring the Company to redeem the reporting of discontinued operation and disclosures of disposals of componentsunits for cash after a specified or determinable date (or dates) or upon the occurrence of an entity. Thisevent that is not solely within the control of the issuer are determined to be contingently redeemable under this guidance defines a discontinued operationand are included as a component or groupRedeemable noncontrolling interests and classified within the mezzanine section between Total liabilities and Stockholders’ equity on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The carrying amount of components disposed or classified as held for sale and represents a strategic shiftthe redeemable noncontrolling interests will be changed by periodic accretions, so that has (orthe carrying amount will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and final result;equal the guidance states that a strategic shift could include a disposal of a major geographical area of operations, a major line of business, a major equity method investment or other major parts of an entity. The guidance also provides for additional disclosure requirements in connection with both discontinued operations and other dispositions not qualifying as discontinued operations. The guidance is effective for all companies for annual and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014. The guidance applies prospectively to new disposals and new classifications of disposal groups as held for sale afterestimated future redemption value at the effectiveredemption date. All entities could early adopt the guidance for new disposals (or new classifications as held for sale) that had not been reported in financial statements previously issued or available for issuance. The Company elected to early adopt this standard effective with the interim period beginning January 1, 2014.
Prior to January 1, 2014, properties identified as held for sale and/or disposed of were presented in discontinued operations for all periods presented. See Note 7: Discontinued Operations – to the Financial Statements.
The following comparisons for the year ended December 31, 20152018 (“2015”2018”), as compared to the year ended December 31, 2014 (2014)2017 (“2017”), and for 20142017 as compared to the year ended December 31, 20132016 (“2013”2016”) make reference to the following: (i) the effect of the “Same-Store Properties,” which represent all in-service properties owned by the Company at December 31, 2013,2016, (for the 20152018 versus 20142017 comparisons), and which represent all in-service properties owned by the Company at December 31, 20122015 (for the 20142017 versus 20132016 comparisons), excluding properties sold, disposed of, removed from service, or being redeveloped or repositioned from January 1, 20142016 through December 31, 2015;2018; (ii) the effect of the “Acquired Properties,” which represent all properties acquired by the Company or commencing initial operation from January 1, 20142017 through December 31, 20152018 (for the 20152018 versus 20142017 comparisons), and which represents all properties acquired by the Company or commencing initial operations from January 1, 20132016 through December 31, 20142017 (for the 20142017 versus 20132016 comparisons), and (iii) the effect of “Properties Sold” which represent properties sold, disposed of, or removed from service (including properties being redeveloped or repositioned) by the Company from January 1, 20142016 through December 31, 2015.2018. During the 20152018 and 20142017 periods, foursix office properties, aggregating 657,523638,481 square feet, were removed from service as they were being redeveloped by the Company.
Year Ended December 31, 20152018 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2014
| Year Ended | |||||||||||
| December 31, | Dollar | Percent | |||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | 2015 | 2014 | Change | Change | |||||||
| Revenue from rental operations and other: | |||||||||||
| Base rents | $ | 487,041 | $ | 516,727 | $ | (29,686) | (5.7) | % | |||
| Escalations and recoveries from tenants | 62,481 | 78,554 | (16,073) | (20.5) | |||||||
| Parking income | 11,124 | 9,107 | 2,017 | 22.1 | |||||||
| Other income | 4,617 | 3,773 | 844 | 22.4 | |||||||
| Total revenues from rental operations | 565,263 | 608,161 | (42,898) | (7.1) | |||||||
| Property expenses: | |||||||||||
| Real estate taxes | 82,688 | 90,750 | (8,062) | (8.9) | |||||||
| Utilities | 55,965 | 72,822 | (16,857) | (23.1) | |||||||
| Operating services | 107,951 | 112,621 | (4,670) | (4.1) | |||||||
| Total property expenses | 246,604 | 276,193 | (29,589) | (10.7) | |||||||
| Non-property revenues: | |||||||||||
| Real estate services | 29,620 | 28,638 | 982 | 3.4 | |||||||
| Total non-property revenues | 29,620 | 28,638 | 982 | 3.4 | |||||||
| Non-property expenses: | |||||||||||
| Real estate services expenses | 25,583 | 26,136 | (553) | (2.1) | |||||||
| General and administrative | 49,147 | 71,051 | (21,904) | (30.8) | |||||||
| Acquisition-related costs | 1,560 | 2,118 | (558) | (26.3) | |||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 170,402 | 172,490 | (2,088) | (1.2) | |||||||
| Impairments | 197,919 | - | 197,919 | - | |||||||
| Total non-property expenses | 444,611 | 271,795 | 172,816 | 63.6 | |||||||
| Operating income (loss) | (96,332) | 88,811 | (185,143) | (208.5) | |||||||
| Other (expense) income: | |||||||||||
| Interest expense | (103,051) | (112,878) | 9,827 | 8.7 | |||||||
| Interest and other investment income | 794 | 3,615 | (2,821) | (78.0) | |||||||
| Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures | (3,172) | (2,423) | (749) | (30.9) | |||||||
| Realized gains (losses) on disposition | |||||||||||
| of rental property, net | 53,261 | 54,848 | (1,587) | (2.9) | |||||||
| Gain on sale of investment in unconsolidated joint venture | 6,448 | - | 6,448 | - | |||||||
| Loss from early extinguishment of debt | - | (582) | 582 | 100.0 | |||||||
| Total other (expense) income | (45,720) | (57,420) | 11,700 | 20.4 | |||||||
| Net income (loss) | (142,052) | 31,391 | (173,443) | (552.5) | |||||||
| Noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures | 1,044 | 778 | 266 | 34.2 | |||||||
| Noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership | 15,256 | (3,602) | 18,858 | 523.5 | |||||||
| Net income (loss) available to common shareholders | $ | (125,752) | $ | 28,567 | $ | (154,319) | (540.2) | % | |||
|
| Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
| December 31, |
| Dollar |
| Percent |
| |||||
(dollars in thousands) |
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| Change |
| Change |
| |||
Revenue from rental operations and other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Base rents |
| $ | 436,222 |
| $ | 501,334 |
| $ | (65,112 | ) | (13.0 | )% |
Escalations and recoveries from tenants |
| 44,121 |
| 58,767 |
| (14,646 | ) | (24.9 | ) | |||
Parking income |
| 22,117 |
| 20,270 |
| 1,847 |
| 9.1 |
| |||
Other income |
| 11,052 |
| 12,700 |
| (1,648 | ) | (13.0 | ) | |||
Total revenues from rental operations |
| 513,512 |
| 593,071 |
| (79,559 | ) | (13.4 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Property expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Real estate taxes |
| 64,555 |
| 81,364 |
| (16,809 | ) | (20.7 | ) | |||
Utilities |
| 39,054 |
| 42,598 |
| (3,544 | ) | (8.3 | ) | |||
Operating services |
| 102,626 |
| 107,379 |
| (4,753 | ) | (4.4 | ) | |||
Total property expenses |
| 206,235 |
| 231,341 |
| (25,106 | ) | (10.9 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Non-property revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Real estate services |
| 17,094 |
| 23,129 |
| (6,035 | ) | (26.1 | ) | |||
Total non-property revenues |
| 17,094 |
| 23,129 |
| (6,035 | ) | (26.1 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Non-property expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Real estate services expenses |
| 17,919 |
| 23,394 |
| (5,475 | ) | (23.4 | ) | |||
General and administrative |
| 53,988 |
| 50,949 |
| 3,039 |
| 6.0 |
| |||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 174,847 |
| 205,169 |
| (30,322 | ) | (14.8 | ) | |||
Land Impairments |
| 24,566 |
| — |
| 24,566 |
| — |
| |||
Total non-property expenses |
| 271,320 |
| 279,512 |
| (8,192 | ) | (2.9 | ) | |||
Other (expense) income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Interest expense |
| (83,754 | ) | (93,388 | ) | 9,634 |
| 10.3 |
| |||
Interest and other investment income (loss) |
| 3,389 |
| 2,766 |
| 623 |
| 22.5 |
| |||
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures |
| (127 | ) | (6,081 | ) | 5,954 |
| 97.9 |
| |||
Gain on change of control of interests |
| 14,217 |
| — |
| 14,217 |
| — |
| |||
Realized gains (losses) and unrealized losses on disposition of rental property, net |
| 99,436 |
| 2,364 |
| 97,072 |
| 4,106.3 |
| |||
Gain on disposition of developable land |
| 30,939 |
| — |
| 30,939 |
| — |
| |||
Gain on sale of investment in unconsolidated joint venture |
| — |
| 23,131 |
| (23,131 | ) | (100.0 | ) | |||
Loss from extinguishment of debt, net |
| (10,750 | ) | (421 | ) | (10,329 | ) | (2,453.4 | ) | |||
Total other (expense) income |
| 53,350 |
| (71,629 | ) | 124,979 |
| 174.5 |
| |||
Net income |
| $ | 106,401 |
| $ | 33,718 |
| $ | 72,683 |
| 215.6 | % |
The following is a summary of the changes in revenue from rental operations and other, and property expenses, in 20152018 as compared to 20142017 divided into Same-Store Properties, Acquired Properties and Properties Sold in 20142017 and 20152018:
| Total | Same-Store | Acquired | Properties | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Company | Properties | Properties | Sold in 2014 and 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Dollar | Percent | Dollar | Percent | Dollar | Percent | Dollar | Percent | ||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Change | Change | Change | Change | Change | Change | Change | Change | |||||||||||||||
| Revenue from rental | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| operations and other: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Base rents | $ | (29,686) | (5.7) | % | $ | 6,660 | 1.3 | % | $ | 1,780 | 0.3 | % | $ | (38,126) | (7.3) | % | |||||||
| Escalations and recoveries | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| from tenants | (16,073) | (20.5) | (9,166) | (11.7) | 128 | 0.2 | (7,035) | (9.0) | |||||||||||||||
| Parking income | 2,017 | 22.1 | 1,100 | 12.1 | 915 | 10.0 | 2 | - | |||||||||||||||
| Other income | 844 | 22.4 | 547 | 14.5 | (24) | (0.6) | 321 | 8.5 | |||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | (42,898) | (7.1) | % | $ | (859) | (0.1) | % | $ | 2,799 | 0.5 | % | $ | (44,838) | (7.5) | % | |||||||
| Property expenses: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Real estate taxes | $ | (8,062) | (8.9) | % | $ | (5,314) | (5.9) | % | $ | 2,034 | 2.2 | % | $ | (4,782) | (5.2) | % | |||||||
| Utilities | (16,857) | (23.1) | (10,701) | (14.7) | 218 | 0.3 | (6,374) | (8.7) | |||||||||||||||
| Operating services | (4,670) | (4.1) | 1,545 | 1.4 | 1,268 | 1.1 | (7,483) | (6.6) | |||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | (29,589) | (10.7) | % | $ | (14,470) | (5.2) | % | $ | 3,520 | 1.3 | % | $ | (18,639) | (6.8) | % | |||||||
| OTHER DATA: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of Consolidated Properties | 223 | 221 | 2 | 26 | |||||||||||||||||||
Commercial Square feet (in thousands) | 24,212 | 24,016 | 196 | 3,959 | |||||||||||||||||||
Multi-family portfolio (number of units) | 1,301 | 1,081 | 220 | - | |||||||||||||||||||
|
| Total |
| Same-Store |
| Acquired |
| Properties |
| ||||||||||||
|
| Dollar |
| Percent |
| Dollar |
| Percent |
| Dollar |
| Percent |
| Dollar |
| Percent |
| ||||
(dollars in thousands) |
| Change |
| Change |
| Change |
| Change |
| Change |
| Change |
| Change |
| Change |
| ||||
Revenue from rental operations and other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Base rents |
| $ | (65,112 | ) | (13.0 | )% | $ | (20,899 | ) | (4.2 | )% | $ | 28,011 |
| 5.6 | % | $ | (72,224 | ) | (14.4 | )% |
Escalations and recoveries from tenants |
| (14,646 | ) | (24.9 | ) | (4,392 | ) | (7.5 | ) | 1,700 |
| 2.9 |
| (11,954 | ) | (20.3 | ) | ||||
Parking income |
| 1,847 |
| 9.1 |
| 916 |
| 4.5 |
| 2,090 |
| 10.3 |
| (1,159 | ) | (5.7 | ) | ||||
Other income |
| (1,648 | ) | (13.0 | ) | (2,428 | ) | (19.1 | ) | 1,401 |
| 11.0 |
| (621 | ) | (4.9 | ) | ||||
Total |
| $ | (79,559 | ) | (13.4 | )% | $ | (26,803 | ) | (4.5 | )% | $ | 33,202 |
| 5.6 | % | $ | (85,958 | ) | (14.5 | )% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Property expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Real estate taxes |
| $ | (16,809 | ) | (20.7 | )% | $ | (6,820 | ) | (8.4 | )% | $ | 2,933 |
| 3.6 | % | $ | (12,922 | ) | (15.9 | )% |
Utilities |
| (3,544 | ) | (8.3 | ) | 1,355 |
| 3.2 |
| 2,177 |
| 5.1 |
| (7,076 | ) | (16.6 | ) | ||||
Operating services |
| (4,753 | ) | (4.4 | ) | 1,145 |
| 1.1 |
| 7,710 |
| 7.2 |
| (13,608 | ) | (12.7 | ) | ||||
Total |
| $ | (25,106 | ) | (10.9 | )% | $ | (4,320 | ) | (1.9 | )% | $ | 12,820 |
| 5.5 | % | $ | (33,606 | ) | (14.5 | )% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
OTHER DATA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Number of Consolidated Properties |
| 120 |
|
|
| 105 |
|
|
| 15 |
|
|
| 97 |
|
|
| ||||
Commercial Square feet (in thousands) |
| 14,857 |
|
|
| 13,601 |
|
|
| 1,256 |
|
|
| 7,669 |
|
|
| ||||
Multi-family portfolio (number of units) |
| 3,988 |
|
|
| 2,028 |
|
|
| 1,960 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| ||||
Base rents. Base rents for the Same-Store Properties increased $6.7decreased $20.9 million, or 1.34.2 percent, for 20152018 as compared to 2014,2017, due primarily to an increase in occupancy in 2015 as compared to 2014, which resulted from a 90650 basis point increasedecrease in the average same store percent leased of the office portfolio from 89.4 percent in 2017 to 85.082.9 percent in 2018, primarily from 84.1 percent and an increasethe Company’s office properties located in average rental rents per square foot to $22.27 from $22.23.
Escalations and recoveries. Escalations and recoveries from tenants for the Same-Store Properties decreased $9.2$4.4 million, or 11.77.5 percent, for 20152018 over 20142017, due primarily to lower real estate tax expenses, as well as lower percent leased, in 2018 at its office properties in Jersey City, New Jersey, which resulted in lower recoveries from tenants of higher electric expenses in 2014 which the Company partially recovers from tenants pursuant2018 as compared to the terms of most of its leases with significantly lower expenses to recover in 2015.
Parking income. Parking income for the Same-Store Properties increased $1.1$0.9 million, or 12.14.5 percent for 20152018 as compared to 20142017 due primarily to increased usage.
Other income. Other income for the Same-Store Properties increased $0.5decreased $2.4 million, or 14.519.1 percent for 2018 as compared to 2017 due primarily to various small income itemsa decrease in 2015.
Real estate taxes. Real estate taxes on the Same-Store Properties decreased $5.3$6.8 million, or 5.98.4 percent, for 20152018 as compared to 2014. The change in real estate taxes principally results from2017 due primarily to an increase in tax appeal proceeds received in 20152018 as compared to 2014.2017. Real estate taxes, without the effect of net tax appeal proceeds, decreased $2.5 million, or 2.9 percent, for 2018 as compared to 2017 due primarily to lower tax assessment values for the Company’s office properties in Jersey City, New Jersey in 2018.
Utilities. Utilities for the Same-Store Properties increased $2.7$1.4 million, or 3.2 percent, for 20152018 as compared to 20142017, due primarily to increased rates.
Operating services. Operating services for the Same-Store Properties increased $1.5$1.1 million, or 1.41.1 percent, due primarily to an increaseseverance, separation and related costs in snow removal and other service2018 from property management restructurings of $1.4 million, partially offset by a decrease of $0.7 million in property maintenance costs for 2015in 2018 as compared to 2014.
Real estate services revenue. Real estate services revenuesrevenue (primarily reimbursement of property personnel costs) increased $1.0decreased $6.0 million, or 3.426.1 percent, for 20152018 as compared to 2014,2017, due primarily to increaseddecreased third party development and property management activity in multi-family services in 20152018 as compared to 2014.
Real estate services expenses. Real estate services expenses decreased $0.6$5.5 million, or 2.123.4 percent, for 20152018 as compared to 2014.2017 due primarily to decreased salaries and related expenses from lower third party services activities in 2018.
General and administrative. General and administrative expenses increased $3.0 million, or 6.0 percent, in 2018 as compared to 2017 due primarily to severance, separation and related costs from management restructurings in 2018 of $6.6 million, partially offset by a decrease in overhead salaries and related expenses from a decrease in overall corporate personnel in 2018 as compared to 2017 of $3.9 million.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization decreased $30.3 million, or 14.8 percent, for 2018 over 2017. This decreaseincrease was due primarily to decreased compensationlower depreciation of approximately $34.1 million for properties sold or removed from service during 2017 and related costs.
Land impairments
Interest expense. Interest expense decreased $9.8$9.6 million, or 8.710.3 percent, for 20152018 as compared to 2014.2017. This decrease was primarily the result of lower overall average debt balances in 2015interest rates for 2018 as compared to 2014.
Interest and other investment income. Interest and other investment income decreased $2.8increased $0.6 million, or 78.022.5 percent, for 20152018 as compared to 2014. This was2017 primarily due to interest income on lowerhigher average notes receivable balances outstanding in 2015.
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures. Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures decreased $0.7increased $6.0 million, or 30.997.9 percent, for 20152018 as compared to 2014.2017. The decreaseincrease was due primarily to a lossan increase of $3.7 million in 2015 from the Capitol Place Mezz venture (which commenced operations in 2015), and a gain of $2.3 million in 2014 from the Stanford SM venture (the venture’s note receivable was repaid in 2014). These were partially offset by income of $3.8 million in 2015 from distributions received from the Keystone-Penn joint venture due to a loan refinancing of the venture’s property and a decreased loss from the Rosewood Lafayette Holdings joint venture (in which the Company sold its interest in 2015) of $0.8$5.4 million for 20152018 as compared to 2014.2017 from the Urby at Harborside venture, which was placed in service in 2017, and also included in 2018 the Company’s share of $2.6 million from venture’s sale of an economic tax credit to a third party.
Gain on change of control of interests.
Realized gains (losses) and unrealized losses on disposition of rental property, net. The Company had realized gains (unrealized losses) on disposition of rental property of $53.3$99.4 million in 20152018 and $54.8$2.4 million in 2014.2017. See Note 3: Recent Transactions –— Dispositions –— to the Financial Statements.
Gain on disposition of developable land.
Gain on sale of investment in unconsolidated joint venture.The In 2017, the Company realizedrecorded a gain of $6.4$23.1 million in 2015gain on the sale in 2017 of its equity interestinterests in the Rosewood Lafayette Holdings L.L.C.certain joint venture.
Loss from early extinguishment of debt. debt, net.In 2014,2018, the Company recognized a loss from early extinguishment of debt of $582,000$10.8 million in connection with the early prepayment of certain mortgage payables. In 2017, the Company recognized a loss from extinguishment of debt of $0.4 million due to allocated costs as a result of the early redemptionamendment of $150 million principal amountits revolving credit facility in 2017 and the refinancing of 5.125 percent Notesa mortgage loan in December 2014, which were scheduled2017. See Note 8 to mature in January 2015.the Financial Statements: Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loans and Note 9 to the Financial Statements: Mortgages, Loans Payable and Other Obligations.
Net income.
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders. Net income available to common shareholders decreased $154.3 million, or 540.2 percent, from income of $28.6 million in 2014 to a loss of approximately $125.7 million in 2015. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in net income of $173.4 million for 2015 as compared to 2014 (primarily due to the impairment charges in 2015 of $197.9 million). This was partially offset by an increase in noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership of $18.9 million for 2015 as compared to 2014, and an increase in noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures of approximately $0.2 million for 2015 as compared to 2014.
| Year Ended | |||||||||||
| December 31, | Dollar | Percent | |||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | 2014 | 2013 | Change | Change | |||||||
| Revenue from rental operations and other: | |||||||||||
| Base rents | $ | 516,727 | $ | 540,165 | $ | (23,438) | (4.3) | % | |||
| Escalations and recoveries from tenants | 78,554 | 72,758 | 5,796 | 8.0 | |||||||
| Parking income | 9,107 | 6,840 | 2,267 | 33.1 | |||||||
| Other income | 3,773 | 4,683 | (910) | (19.4) | |||||||
| Total revenues from rental operations | 608,161 | 624,446 | (16,285) | (2.6) | |||||||
| Property expenses: | |||||||||||
| Real estate taxes | 90,750 | 85,574 | 5,176 | 6.0 | |||||||
| Utilities | 72,822 | 63,622 | 9,200 | 14.5 | |||||||
| Operating services | 112,621 | 105,278 | 7,343 | 7.0 | |||||||
| Total property expenses | 276,193 | 254,474 | 21,719 | 8.5 | |||||||
| Non-property revenues: | |||||||||||
| Construction services | - | 15,650 | (15,650) | (100.0) | |||||||
| Real estate services | 28,638 | 26,935 | 1,703 | 6.3 | |||||||
| Total non-property revenues | 28,638 | 42,585 | (13,947) | (32.8) | |||||||
| Non-property expenses: | |||||||||||
| Direct construction costs | - | 14,945 | (14,945) | (100.0) | |||||||
| Real estate services expenses | 26,136 | 22,716 | 3,420 | 15.1 | |||||||
| General and administrative | 71,051 | 47,040 | 24,011 | 51.0 | |||||||
| Acquisition-related costs | 2,118 | 642 | 1,476 | 229.9 | |||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 172,490 | 182,766 | (10,276) | (5.6) | |||||||
| Impairments | - | 110,853 | (110,853) | (100.0) | |||||||
| Total non-property expenses | 271,795 | 378,962 | (107,167) | (28.3) | |||||||
| Operating income (loss) | 88,811 | 33,595 | 55,216 | 164.4 | |||||||
| Other (expense) income: | |||||||||||
| Interest expense | (112,878) | (123,701) | 10,823 | 8.7 | |||||||
| Interest and other investment income | 3,615 | 2,903 | 712 | 24.5 | |||||||
| Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures | (2,423) | (2,327) | (96) | (4.1) | |||||||
| Realized gains (losses) on disposition | |||||||||||
| of rental property, net | 54,848 | - | 54,848 | - | |||||||
| Loss from early extinguishment of debt | (582) | (156) | (426) | (273.1) | |||||||
| Total other (expense) income | (57,420) | (123,281) | 65,861 | 53.4 | |||||||
| Income (loss) from continuing operations | 31,391 | (89,686) | 121,077 | 135.0 | |||||||
| Discontinued operations: | |||||||||||
| Income from discontinued operations | - | 11,811 | (11,811) | (100.0) | |||||||
| Loss from early extinguishment of debt | - | (703) | 703 | 100.0 | |||||||
| Realized gains (losses) and unrealized losses on | |||||||||||
| disposition of rental property and impairments, net | - | 59,520 | (59,520) | (100.0) | |||||||
| Total discontinued operations, net | - | 70,628 | (70,628) | (100.0) | |||||||
| Net income (loss) | 31,391 | (19,058) | 50,449 | 264.7 | |||||||
| Noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures | 778 | 2,199 | (1,421) | (64.6) | |||||||
| Noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership | (3,602) | 10,459 | (14,061) | (134.4) | |||||||
| Noncontrolling interest in discontinued operations | - | (8,509) | 8,509 | 100.0 | |||||||
| Net income (loss) available to common shareholders | $ | 28,567 | $ | (14,909) | $ | 43,476 | 291.6 | % | |||
|
| Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
| December 31, |
| Dollar |
| Percent |
| |||||
(dollars in thousands) |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
| Change |
| Change |
| |||
Revenue from rental operations and other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Base rents |
| $ | 501,334 |
| $ | 506,877 |
| $ | (5,543 | ) | (1.1 | )% |
Escalations and recoveries from tenants |
| 58,767 |
| 60,505 |
| (1,738 | ) | (2.9 | ) | |||
Parking income |
| 20,270 |
| 13,630 |
| 6,640 |
| 48.7 |
| |||
Other income |
| 12,700 |
| 5,797 |
| 6,903 |
| 119.1 |
| |||
Total revenues from rental operations |
| 593,071 |
| 586,809 |
| 6,262 |
| 1.1 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Property expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Real estate taxes |
| 81,364 |
| 87,379 |
| (6,015 | ) | (6.9 | ) | |||
Utilities |
| 42,598 |
| 49,624 |
| (7,026 | ) | (14.2 | ) | |||
Operating services |
| 107,379 |
| 103,954 |
| 3,425 |
| 3.3 |
| |||
Total property expenses |
| 231,341 |
| 240,957 |
| (9,616 | ) | (4.0 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Non-property revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Real estate services |
| 23,129 |
| 26,589 |
| (3,460 | ) | (13.0 | ) | |||
Total non-property revenues |
| 23,129 |
| 26,589 |
| (3,460 | ) | (13.0 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Non-property expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Real estate services expenses |
| 23,394 |
| 26,260 |
| (2,866 | ) | (10.9 | ) | |||
General and administrative |
| 50,949 |
| 51,979 |
| (1,030 | ) | (2.0 | ) | |||
Acquisition-related costs |
| — |
| 2,880 |
| (2,880 | ) | (100.0 | ) | |||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 205,169 |
| 186,684 |
| 18,485 |
| 9.9 |
| |||
Total non-property expenses |
| 279,512 |
| 267,803 |
| 11,709 |
| 4.4 |
| |||
Other (expense) income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Interest expense |
| (93,388 | ) | (94,889 | ) | 1,501 |
| 1.6 |
| |||
Interest and other investment income |
| 2,766 |
| 1,614 |
| 1,152 |
| 71.4 |
| |||
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures |
| (6,081 | ) | 18,788 |
| (24,869 | ) | (132.4 | ) | |||
Gain on change of control of interests |
| — |
| 15,347 |
| (15,347 | ) | (100.0 | ) | |||
Realized gains (losses) and unrealized losses on disposition of rental property, net |
| 2,364 |
| 109,666 |
| (107,302 | ) | (97.8 | ) | |||
Gain on sale of investment in unconsolidated joint venture |
| 23,131 |
| 5,670 |
| 17,461 |
| 308.0 |
| |||
Loss from extinguishment of debt, net |
| (421 | ) | (30,540 | ) | 30,119 |
| 98.6 |
| |||
Total other (expense) income |
| (71,629 | ) | 25,656 |
| (97,285 | ) | (379.2 | ) | |||
Net income |
| $ | 33,718 |
| $ | 130,294 |
| $ | (96,576 | ) | (74.1 | )% |
The following is a summary of the changes in revenue from rental operations and other, and property expenses, in 20142017 as compared to 20132016 divided into Same-Store Properties, Acquired Properties and Properties Sold in 2014:
| Total | Same-Store | Acquired | Properties | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Company | Properties | Properties | Sold in 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Dollar | Percent | Dollar | Percent | Dollar | Percent | Dollar | Percent | ||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Change | Change | Change | Change | Change | Change | Change | Change | |||||||||||||||
| Revenue from rental | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| operations and other: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Base rents | $ | (23,438) | (4.3) | % | $ | (13,831) | (2.5) | % | $ | 13,073 | 2.4 | % | $ | (22,680) | (4.2) | % | |||||||
| Escalations and recoveries | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| from tenants | 5,796 | 8.0 | 8,840 | 12.2 | 1,042 | 1.4 | (4,086) | (5.6) | |||||||||||||||
| Parking income | 2,267 | 33.1 | (210) | (3.1) | 2,485 | 36.3 | (8) | (0.1) | |||||||||||||||
| Other income | (910) | (19.4) | (1,475) | (31.5) | 644 | 13.8 | (79) | (1.7) | |||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | (16,285) | (2.6) | % | $ | (6,676) | (1.0) | % | $ | 17,244 | 2.7 | % | $ | (26,853) | (4.3) | % | |||||||
| Property expenses: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Real estate taxes | $ | 5,176 | 6.0 | % | $ | 6,113 | 7.1 | % | $ | 2,483 | 2.9 | % | $ | (3,420) | (4.0) | % | |||||||
| Utilities | 9,200 | 14.5 | 11,025 | 17.3 | 862 | 1.4 | (2,687) | (4.2) | |||||||||||||||
| Operating services | 7,343 | 7.0 | 9,149 | 8.7 | 2,732 | 2.6 | (4,538) | (4.3) | |||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 21,719 | 8.5 | % | $ | 26,287 | 10.3 | % | $ | 6,077 | 2.4 | % | $ | (10,645) | (4.2) | % | |||||||
| OTHER DATA: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of Consolidated Properties | 232 | 224 | 8 | 16 | |||||||||||||||||||
Commercial Square feet (in thousands) | 25,363 | 25,137 | 226 | 2,611 | |||||||||||||||||||
Multi-family portfolio (number of units) | 1,301 | - | 1,301 | - | |||||||||||||||||||
|
| Total |
| Same-Store |
| Acquired |
| Properties |
| ||||||||||||
|
| Company |
| Properties |
| Properties |
| Sold in 2016 and 2017 |
| ||||||||||||
|
| Dollar |
| Percent |
| Dollar |
| Percent |
| Dollar |
| Percent |
| Dollar |
| Percent |
| ||||
(dollars in thousands) |
| Change |
| Change |
| Change |
| Change |
| Change |
| Change |
| Change |
| Change |
| ||||
Revenue from rental operations and other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Base rents |
| $ | (5,543 | ) | (1.1 | )% | $ | 5,653 |
| 1.1 | % | $ | 72,837 |
| 14.4 | % | $ | (84,033 | ) | (16.6 | )% |
Escalations and recoveries from tenants |
| (1,738 | ) | (2.9 | ) | 2,274 |
| 3.8 |
| 4,444 |
| 7.3 |
| (8,456 | ) | (14.0 | ) | ||||
Parking income |
| 6,640 |
| 48.7 |
| 4,330 |
| 31.8 |
| 2,512 |
| 18.4 |
| (202 | ) | (1.5 | ) | ||||
Other income |
| 6,903 |
| 119.1 |
| (767 | ) | (13.2 | ) | 7,729 |
| 133.3 |
| (59 | ) | (1.0 | ) | ||||
Total |
| $ | 6,262 |
| 1.1 | % | $ | 11,490 |
| 2.0 | % | $ | 87,522 |
| 14.9 | % | $ | (92,750 | ) | (15.8 | )% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Property expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Real estate taxes |
| $ | (6,015 | ) | (6.9 | )% | $ | 808 |
| 0.9 | % | $ | 8,975 |
| 10.3 | % | $ | (15,798 | ) | (18.1 | )% |
Utilities |
| (7,026 | ) | (14.2 | ) | (502 | ) | (1.0 | ) | 4,131 |
| 8.3 |
| (10,655 | ) | (21.5 | ) | ||||
Operating services |
| 3,425 |
| 3.3 |
| 4,530 |
| 4.4 |
| 14,853 |
| 14.3 |
| (15,958 | ) | (15.4 | ) | ||||
Total |
| $ | (9,616 | ) | (4.0 | )% | $ | 4,836 |
| 2.0 | % | $ | 27,959 |
| 11.6 | % | $ | (42,411 | ) | (17.6 | )% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
OTHER DATA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Number of Consolidated Properties |
| 142 |
|
|
| 126 |
|
|
| 16 |
|
|
| 98 |
|
|
| ||||
Commercial Square feet (in thousands) |
| 17,148 |
|
|
| 15,130 |
|
|
| 2,018 |
|
|
| 9,300 |
|
|
| ||||
Multi-family portfolio (number of units) |
| 2,551 |
|
|
| 1,081 |
|
|
| 1,470 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| ||||
Base rents. Base rents for the Same-Store Properties decreased $13.8increased $5.7 million, or 2.51.1 percent, for 20142017 as compared to 2013,2016, due primarily to a decrease$0.97 increase in occupancy and rental rates in 2014average office annual rents per square foot to $24.78 for 2017 as compared to 2013.
Escalations and recoveries. Escalations and recoveries from tenants for the Same-Store Properties increased $8.8$2.3 million, or 12.23.8 percent, for 20142017 over 20132016 due primarily to recoveries from tenants of higher electricproperty expenses to recover in 2014 which the Company partially recovers from tenants pursuant to the terms of most of its leases. Related to the Company’s recovery from tenants of the increases in 2014 of real estate taxes and operating services, the portion the Company is recovering of those expenses has generally been reduced in 2014 primarily as a result of lower occupancies, in conjunction with the re-set of base years on new and renewed leases, in 2014.
Parking income.Parking income for the Same-Store Properties was relatively unchangedincreased $4.3 million, or 31.8 percent for 20142017 as compared to 2013.
Other income. Other income for the Same-Store Properties decreased $1.5$0.8 million, or 31.513.2 percent for 2017 as compared to 2016 due primarily to proceeds from a decreaselitigation settlement received in 2016 with no similar income in 2017. $4.8 million of the increase in other income for the Acquired Properties in 2017 over 2016 was due to lease breakage fees recognized in 2014 as compared to 2013.
Real estate taxes.Real estate taxes on the Same-Store Properties increased $6.1 million, or 7.1 percent, for 2014 as compared to 2013. The change in real estate taxes principally results from a decrease in tax appeal proceeds received in 2014 as compared to 2013. Real estate taxes, without the effect of net tax appeal proceeds, increased $0.7$0.8 million, or 0.9 percent, for 20142017 as compared to 20132016 due primarily to increased rates.
Utilities.Utilities for the Same-Store Properties increased $11.0decreased $0.5 million, or 17.31.0 percent, for 20142017 as compared to 2013. Extended winter freeze conditions2016, due primarily to decreased usage in early 2014 caused record electricity demand, and combined with reduced natural gas production and distribution disruptions, resulted in significant market price increases for electricity during the period.
Operating services.Operating services for the Same-Store Properties increased $9.1$4.5 million, or 8.74.4 percent, due primarily to an increase in repairsproperty maintenance costs and maintenance, snow removal and insurance costsparking services expenses for 20142017 as compared to 2013.
Real estate services revenue.Real estate services revenuesrevenue (primarily reimbursement of property personnel costs) increased by $1.7decreased $3.5 million, or 6.313.0 percent, for 20142017 as compared to 2013,2016, due primarily to increaseddecreased third party development and property management activity in multi-family services in 20142017 as compared to 2013.
Real estate services expenses.Real estate services expenses increased $3.4decreased $2.9 million, or 15.110.9 percent, for 20142017 as compared to 2013. This increase was2016 due primarily to increased compensationdecreased salaries and related costs from increased development and management activity in multifamilyexpenses due to lower third party services in 2014 as compared to 2013.
General and administrative.General and administrative expenses increased $24.0decreased $1.0 million, or 2.0 percent, in 20142017 as compared to 2013, which was2016 due primarily due to severance costsa decrease in overhead salaries and related to the pending departure of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the departure of certain of the Company’s other executive officers in 2014.
Acquisition-related costs. The Company incurred transaction costs of $2.1$2.9 million in 2014 and $0.6 million in 20132016 related to the Company’s property and joint venture acquisitions. See Note 3 toacquisitions, which were expensed for the Financial Statements: Recent Transactions – Acquisitions.
Depreciation and amortization.Depreciation and amortization decreased by $10.3increased $18.5 million, or 5.69.9 percent, for 20142017 over 2013.2016. This decreaseincrease was due primarily to a decreasedepreciation of $4.6$41.1 million in 2017 on the Acquired Properties, and an increase of $3.1 million for 2017 as compared to 2016 on the Same-Store Properties due to assets becoming fully amortized, and a decreaseaccelerated depreciation on buildings planning to be removed from service, partially offset by lower depreciation of $8.7$25.7 million for 2014in 2017 as compared to 20132016 for the properties sold in 2014 (which were not classified as discontinued operations). These were partially offset by an increase of $3.0or removed from service.
Interest expense. Interest expense decreased $1.5 million, or 1.6 percent, for 20142017 as compared to 2013 for the Acquired Properties.
Interest and other investment income.Interest and other investment income increased $0.7$1.2 million, or 24.571.4 percent, for 20142017 as compared to 2013. This was2016 primarily due to interest income onas a result of $1.6 million from higher average notes receivable balances in 2014.
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures.Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures decreased $0.1$24.9 million, or 4.1132.4 percent, for 20142017 as compared to 2013.2016. The Company had decreaseddecrease was due primarily to a decrease in equity earnings income of $20.9 million from refinancing proceeds received in 20142016 from the Company’s South Pier at Harborside hotel joint venture in excess of $1.4its carrying value, with no similar activity in 2017, and an equity loss in 2017 of $6.1 million from the Stamford SMCompany’s URL Harborside venture, (due towhich was placed in service in 2017 but was in the venture’s note receivable being repaid in 2014), and an increased losslease-up stage during the year.
Gain on change of $1.2control of interests. In 2016, the Company recorded a gain on change of control of $15.3 million in 2014 fromconnection with the PruRose Riverwalk G venture. These were partially offset by increased income of $2.5 million from the Crystal House Apartments Investors venture in 2014 (as a resultacquisitions of the joint venture being entered intoremaining interests of residential properties located in March 2013).
Realized gains (losses) and unrealized losses on disposition of rental property, net.The Company had realized gains on disposition of rental property of $54.8$2.4 million in 2014 (which were not classified as discontinued operations).2017 and $109.7 million in 2016. See Note 3: Recent Transactions –— Dispositions –— to the Financial Statements.
Gain on sale of investment in unconsolidated joint venture.
Loss from early extinguishment of debt. debt, net.In 2014,2017, the Company recognized lossesa loss from early extinguishment of debt of $582,000 as compared to $156,000 in 2013. The 2014 amount was$0.4 million due to the early redemption of $150 million principal amount of 5.125 percent Notes in December 2014, which were scheduled to mature in January 2015. The 2013 amount was due to the partial early termination and extension of the Company’s revolving credit facilityallocated costs as a result of decreased participationthe amendment of its revolving credit facility in 2017 and the refinancing of a mortgage loan in 2017. In 2016, the Company recognized a loss from extinguishment of debt, net, of $30.5 million due primarily to the costs of repayment of certain lenders insenior unsecured notes and a mortgage loan of $42.5 million offset by a gain from a discounted mortgage loan repayment of $12.4 million. See Note 7 to the facility.Financial Statements: Senior Unsecured Notes, Note 8 to the Financial Statements: Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loans and Note 9 to the Financial Statements: Mortgages, Loans Payable and Other Obligations.
Net income.
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders. Net income available to common shareholders increased by $43.5 million, or 291.6 percent, from a loss of $14.9 million in 2013 to income of $28.6 million in 2014. The increase was primarily due to an increase in income from continuing operations of $121.1 million for 2014 as compared to 2013 (mostly due to the impairment charges in 2013 of $110.9 million), an impairment charge of $23.9 million on discontinued operations in 2013, a decrease in noncontrolling interest in discontinued operations of $8.5 million for 2014 as compared to 2013 and a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $0.7 million in 2013. These were partially offset by realized gains on disposition of rental property, net of $83.4 million in 2013 (which were classified as discontinued operations), a decrease in noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership of $14.1 million for 2014 as compared to 2013, a decrease in income from discontinued operations of $11.8 million for 2014 as compared to 2013, and a decrease in noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures of $1.4 million for 2014 as compared to 2013.
Liquidity
Overview:
Historically, rental revenue has been the Company’s principal source of funds to pay operating expenses, debt service, capital expenditures and dividends, excluding non-recurring capital expenditures. To the extent that the Company’s cash flow from operating activities is insufficient to finance its non-recurring capital expenditures such as property acquisitions, development and construction
costs and other capital expenditures, the Company has and expects to continue to finance such activities through borrowings under its unsecured revolving credit facility, other debt and equity financings, proceeds from the sale of properties and joint venture capital.
The Company expects to meet its short-term liquidity requirements generally through its working capital, which may include proceeds from the sales of office properties, net cash provided by operating activities and draw from its unsecured revolving credit facility. The Company frequently examines potential property acquisitions and development projects and, at any given time, one or more of such acquisitions or development projects may be under consideration. Accordingly, the ability to fund property acquisitions and development projects is a major part of the Company’s financing requirements. The Company expects to meet its financing requirements through funds generated from operating activities, to the extent available, proceeds from property sales, joint venture capital, long-term and short-term borrowings (including draws on the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility) and the issuance of additional debt and/or equity securities.
Repositioning of the Company’s Portfolio:
As described earlier relative to its current strategic initiative, the Company’s management has been reviewing its portfolio and identifying opportunities to divest of non-core office properties that no longer meet its long-term strategy, have reached their potential, are less efficient to operate, or when market conditions are favorable to be sold at attractive prices. The Company anticipates redeployingcontinuing to redeploy the proceeds from non-core rental property sales in the near-term to acquire office or multi-family rental properties, enhance amenities and infrastructure at existing office properties, develop, redevelop and acquire multi-family rental properties, as well as reposition certain office properties into multi-family residential and/or mixed use properties, in its core Northeast sub-markets.
Construction Projects:
In 2015, the Company entered into a 90-percent owned joint venture partnership with XS Port Imperial Hotel, LLC (“XS”) to form XS Hotel Urban Renewal Associates LLC, (“XS Hotel URA”) for the developmentwhich is developing a 372-key hotel (164 keys Residence Inn and ownership of a 364-key dual branded hotel property located208 keys Marriott Envue) in Weehawken, New Jersey (“Port Imperial Hotel”). Concurrently,Jersey. The Residence Inn opened in 4Q 2018 and the Company and XS entered into a separate joint venture partnershipMarriott Envue is expected to form XS Hotel Associates, L.L.C. (“XS Hotel”) for the management and operations of the completed hotel development. The Company holds a 90 percent interest and XS holds the remaining 10 percent interestopen in the consolidated joint ventures, XS Hotel URA and XS Hotel, with the Company having full and complete authority, power, and discretion to manage and control the ventures’ business, affairs, and property.2Q 2019. The construction of the Port Imperial Hotelproject is estimated to cost a total$159.9 million, with construction costs of $105.9$147.1 million which willincurred by the venture through December 31, 2018. The project costs are expected to be funded byfrom a $94 million construction loan with the balance to be funded with members’ capital. Upon closing, Mack-Cali’s initial contribution was $27.3(with $73.4 million which included a capital credit of $23.7 million for its contributed Hotel Condominium Land unit, and XS Hotel’s initial contribution was $3 million. Asoutstanding as of December 31, 2015, the Company incurred development costs of $1.5 million and estimates it will need to fund an additional $3.3 million for the completion of the project.
The Company owns developable land to accommodateis developing a multi-phase development313-unit multi-family project of approximately 1,034-unit multi-family rental property locatedknown as Building 8/9 at Port Imperial in Malden, Massachusetts. The initial phase commencedWeehawken, New Jersey, which began construction of 292 units in the third quarter of 2015 (the “Chase II Project”).2018. The Chase II Projectconstruction project, which is estimated to cost a total$142.6 million of $74.9which construction costs of $35.4 million (of which the Company hashave been incurred $22.1 million through December 31, 2015) and2018, is expected to be ready for occupancy by secondin fourth quarter 2017.2020. The Company estimates it will needis expected to fund additional$50.6 million of construction costs, of $4.8 million for the completion of the Chase II Project. On December 16, 2015,which the Company obtained a construction loan with a maximum borrowing amount of $48has funded $35.4 million (with no outstanding balance as of December 31, 2015), which bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 2.25 percent, reducing to LIBOR plus 2.0 percent subject to achieving certain conditions and matures in December 2018.
The Company is owned by ISA, with shared control over major decisions suchdeveloping a 326-unit multi-family project known as approval of budgets, property financings and leasing guidelines.Chase III at Overlook Ridge, in Malden, Massachusetts, which began construction in third quarter 2018. The construction of the URL Projectproject, which is estimated to cost a total$99.9 million of approximately $320 million (of which development costs of $210.2$20.2 million have been incurred by URL-Harborside through December 31, 2015). The URL Project is projected to be ready for occupancy by the fourth quarter of 2016. The venture has a construction/permanent loan with a maximum borrowing amount of $192 million (with $63.9 million outstanding as of December 31, 2015), which bears interest at a rate of 5.197 percent and matures in August 2029. The Company does not expect to fund any future development costs of the project, as future development costs will be funded by using the loan financing.
In August 2017, the Company acquired an existing mortgage note receivable encumbering a vacant developable land parcel located in Jersey City, New Jersey (the “Land Property”) with a balance of $44.7 million (the “Land Note Receivable”). The Land Note Receivable matures in July 2019 and earns interest at an annual rate of 5.85 percent which accrues monthly and is payable at maturity. In March 2018, the Company expectsreceived a partial prepayment of $3 million. The Land Property is currently an unimproved land parcel which operates as a surface parking facility. Additionally, the Company entered into an agreement to fund approximately $20.9acquire the Land Property, subject to the Company’s ability to obtain all necessary development rights and entitlements to develop an apartment building on the land, and other related conditions to ensure that the Company can develop the project. The purchase price is $73 million, subject to adjustment based on the level of development rights obtained for the developmentconstruction of the project (of which, as of December 31, 2015, the Company has incurred $14.7 million of the development costs and estimates it will need to fund an additional $6.2 million for the completion of the project.
REIT Restrictions:
To maintain its qualification as a REIT under the IRS Code, the CompanyGeneral Partner must make annual distributions to its stockholders of at least 90 percent of its REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and by excluding net capital gains. Moreover, the CompanyGeneral Partner intends to continue to make regular quarterly distributions to its common stockholders. Based upon the most recently paid common stock dividend rate of $0.15$0.20 per common share, in the aggregate, such distributions would equal approximately $53.8$72.2 million ($60.181.8 million, including common units in the Operating Partnership held by parties other than the Company)General Partner) on an annualized basis. However, any such distributions, whether for federal income tax purposes or otherwise, would be paid out of available cash, including borrowings and other sources, after meeting operating requirements, preferred stock dividends and distributions, and scheduled debt service on the Company’s debt. If and to the extent the Company retains and does not distribute any
net capital gains, the CompanyGeneral Partner will be required to pay federal, state and local taxes on such net capital gains at the rate applicable to capital gains of a corporation.
Property Lock-Ups:
Through February 2016, the Company maycould not dispose of or distribute certain of its properties currently comprised of seven properties with an aggregate net carrying value of approximately $57.1 million, which were originally contributed by certain unrelated common unitholders of the Operating Partnership, without the express written consent of such common unitholders, as applicable, except in a manner which doesdid not result in recognition of any built-in-gain (which may result in an income tax liability) or which reimbursesreimbursed the appropriate specific common unitholders for the tax consequences of the recognition of such built-in-gains (collectively, the “Property Lock-Ups”). The aforementioned restrictions do not apply in the event that the Company sells all of its properties or in connection with a sale transaction which the Company’s Board of Directors determines is reasonably necessary to satisfy a material monetary default on any unsecured debt, judgment or liability of the Company or to cure any material monetary default on any mortgage secured by a property. The Property Lock-Ups expire in 2016.
Unencumbered Properties:
As of December 31, 2015,2018, the Company had 204104 unencumbered properties with a carrying value of $2.4$2.2 billion representing 91.088.1 percent of the Company’s total consolidated property count.
Cash Flows
Cash and cash equivalents increaseddecreased by $7.5$18.4 million to $37.1$49.6 million at December 31, 2015,2018, compared to $29.6$68.0 million at December 31, 2014.2017. This increasedecrease is comprised of the following net cash flow items:
(1) | $ | |||||||||||
(2) | $ | |||||||||||
(a) | ||||||||||||
(b) | ||||||||||||
(c) | ||||||||||||
(d) | minus | |||||||||||
(e) | ||||||||||||
(f) $12.1 million received from payments of notes receivables; minus | ||||||||||||
(g) $11.6 million received from distributions in excess of cumulative earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures. | ||||||||||||
(3) | $ | |||||||||||
(a) | ||||||||||||
| plus | ||||||||||||
(b) $418.5 million used for repayments of mortgages, loans payable and other obligations; minus | ||||||||||||
(c) $94 million used for | ||||||||||||
(d) $3.6 million used for payment of finance | cost, minus | |||||||||||
(e) $461 million from borrowings under the revolving credit facility; minus | ||||||||||||
(f) $434.3 million from proceeds received from mortgages and loans payable; minus | ||||||||||||
(g) $105 million from issuance of redeemable noncontrolling interests; minus | ||||||||||||
(h) $7.5 million from contributions to noncontrolling interests. | ||||||||||||
Summary of Debt:
The following is a breakdown of the Company’s debt between fixed and variable-rate financing as of December 31, 2015:
| Balance | Weighted Average | Weighted Average | ||||||
| ($000’s) | % of Total | Interest Rate (a) | Maturity in Years | |||||
| Fixed Rate Unsecured Debt and | ||||||||
| Other Obligations | $ | 1,268,844 | 58.88 | % | 4.88 | % | 4.16 | |
| Fixed Rate Secured Debt | 593,677 | 27.55 | % | 7.15 | % | 2.56 | ||
| Variable Rate Secured Debt | 137,399 | 6.38 | % | 4.09 | % | 1.13 | ||
| Variable Rate Unsecured Debt (b) | 155,000 | 7.19 | % | 1.66 | % | 1.58 | ||
| Totals/Weighted Average: | $ | 2,154,920 | 100.00 | % | 5.22 | % | (b) | 3.34 |
|
| Balance |
| % of Total |
| Weighted Average |
| Weighted Average |
| |
| ||||||||||
Fixed Rate Unsecured Debt and Other Obligations |
| $ | 1,250,000 |
| 44.53 | % | 3.70 | % | 2.04 |
|
Fixed Rate Secured Debt |
| 1,243,219 |
| 44.28 | % | 3.83 | % | 6.70 |
| |
Variable Rate Secured Debt |
| 197,177 |
| 7.02 | % | 5.59 | % | 0.68 |
| |
Variable Rate Unsecured Debt (b) |
| 117,000 |
| 4.17 | % | 3.74 | % | 2.07 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Totals/Weighted Average: |
| $ | 2,807,396 |
| 100.00 | % | 3.89 | %(b) | 4.01 |
|
Adjustment for unamortized debt discount |
| (2,838 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Unamortized deferred financing costs |
| (11,907 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total Debt, Net |
| $ | 2,792,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) The actual weighted average LIBOR rate for the Company’s outstanding variable rate debt was 2.45 percent as of December 31, 2018, plus the applicable spread.
(b) Excludes amortized deferred financing costs primarily pertaining to the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility which amounted to $3.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Debt Maturities:
Scheduled principal payments and related weighted average annual effective interest rates for the Company’s debt as of December 31, 20152018 are as follows:
Period |
| Scheduled |
| Principal |
| Total |
| Weighted Avg. |
| |||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
2019 (b) |
| $ | 532 |
| $ | 546,711 |
| $ | 547,243 |
| 4.11 | % |
2020 |
| 2,903 |
| 325,000 |
| 327,903 |
| 3.46 | % | |||
2021 (c) |
| 3,227 |
| 285,800 |
| 289,027 |
| 3.42 | % | |||
2022 |
| 3,284 |
| 300,000 |
| 303,284 |
| 4.60 | % | |||
2023 |
| 3,412 |
| 333,998 |
| 337,410 |
| 3.53 | % | |||
Thereafter |
| 7,230 |
| 991,929 |
| 999,159 |
| 3.95 | % | |||
Sub-total |
| 20,588 |
| 2,783,438 |
| 2,804,026 |
| 3.89 | % | |||
Adjustment for unamortized debt discount/premium, net as of December 31, 2018 |
| (2,838 | ) | — |
| (2,838 | ) |
|
| |||
Unamortized mark to market |
| 3,370 |
| — |
| 3,370 |
|
|
| |||
Unamortized deferred financing costs |
| (11,907 | ) | — |
| (11,907 | ) |
|
| |||
Totals/Weighted Average |
| $ | 9,213 |
| $ | 2,783,438 |
| $ | 2,792,651 |
| 3.89 | %(d) |
| Scheduled | Principal | Weighted Avg. | ||||||||||
| Amortization | Maturities | Total | Effective Interest Rate of | |||||||||
| Period | ($000’s) | ($000’s) | ($000’s) | Future Repayments (a) | ||||||||
| 2016 | $ | 8,125 | $ | 406,465 | $ | 414,590 | 6.67 | % | ||||
| 2017 (b) | 7,275 | 557,088 | 564,363 | 3.41 | % | |||||||
| 2018 | 7,311 | 231,536 | 238,847 | 6.67 | % | |||||||
| 2019 | 723 | 331,567 | 332,290 | 7.45 | % | |||||||
| 2020 | 569 | - | 569 | 4.82 | % | |||||||
| Thereafter | 5,759 | 605,206 | 610,965 | 4.13 | % | |||||||
| Sub-total | 29,762 | 2,131,862 | 2,161,624 | |||||||||
| Adjustment for unamortized debt | ||||||||||||
| discount/premium, net, as of | ||||||||||||
| December 31, 2015 | (6,704) | - | (6,704) | |||||||||
| Totals/Weighted Average | $ | 23,058 | $ | 2,131,862 | $ | 2,154,920 | 5.22 | % | (c) | |||
(a) The actual weighted average LIBOR rate for the Company’s outstanding variable rate debt was 2.45 percent as of December 31, 2018, plus the applicable spread.
(b) On January 7, 2019, the Company exercised a one-year extension option on the $350 million term loan scheduled to mature in January 2019, which extended the maturity of the Term Loan to January 2020.
(c) Includes outstanding borrowings of the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility of $117 million.
(d) Excludes amortized deferred financing costs primarily pertaining to the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility which amounted to $3.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Senior Unsecured Notes:
The terms of the Company’s senior unsecured notes (which totaled approximately $1.3 billion$570 million as of December 31, 2015)2018) include certain restrictions and covenants which require compliance with financial ratios relating to the maximum amount of debt leverage, the maximum amount of secured indebtedness, the minimum amount of debt service coverage and the maximum amount of unsecured debt as a percent of unsecured assets.
Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility and Term LoanLoans:
On January 7, 2016,25, 2017, the Company obtainedentered into an amended revolving credit facility and new term loan agreement (“2017 Credit Agreement”) with a group of 13 lenders. Pursuant to the 2017 Credit Agreement, the Company refinanced its existing $600 million unsecured revolving credit facility (“2017 Credit Facility”) and entered into a new $350$325 million unsecured term loan which maturesfacility (“2017 Term Loan”). Effective March 6, 2018, the Company elected to determine its interest rate under the 2017 Credit Agreement and under the 2017 Term Loan using the defined leverage ratio option, resulting in an interest rate of LIBOR plus 130 basis points and LIBOR plus 155 basis points, respectively.
The terms of the 2017 Credit Facility include: (1) a four-year term ending in January 20192021, with two six-month extension options; (2) revolving credit loans may be made to the Company in an aggregate principal amount of up to $600 million (subject to increase as discussed below), with a sublimit under the 2017 Credit Facility for the issuance of letters of credit in an amount not to exceed $60 million (subject to increase as discussed below); (3) an interest rate based on the Operating Partnership’s unsecured debt ratings from Moody’s or S&P, or, at the Operating Partnership’s option, if it no longer maintains a debt rating from Moody’s or S&P or such debt ratings fall below Baa3 and BBB-, based on a defined leverage ratio; and (4) a facility fee, currently 25 basis points, payable quarterly based on the Operating Partnership’s unsecured debt ratings from Moody’s or S&P, or, at the Operating Partnership’s option, if it no longer maintains a debt rating from Moody’s or S&P or such debt ratings fall below Baa3 and BBB-, based on a defined leverage ratio.
After electing to use the defined leverage ratio to determine the interest rate, the interest rate under the 2017 Credit Facility is currently based on the following total leverage ratio grid:
Total Leverage Ratio |
| Interest Rate - |
| Interest Rate - |
| Facility Fee |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
| ||||
<45% |
| 125.0 |
| 25.0 |
| 20.0 |
|
>45% and <50% (current ratio) |
| 130.0 |
| 30.0 |
| 25.0 |
|
>50% and <55% |
| 135.0 |
| 35.0 |
| 30.0 |
|
>55% |
| 160.0 |
| 60.0 |
| 35.0 |
|
Prior to the election to use the defined leverage ratio option, the interest rates on outstanding borrowings, alternate base rate loans and the facility fee on the current borrowing capacity, payable quarterly in arrears, on the 2017 Credit Facility were based upon the Operating Partnership’s unsecured debt ratings, as follows:
Operating Partnership’s |
| Interest Rate - |
| Interest Rate - |
| Facility Fee |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
| ||||
No ratings or less than BBB-/Baa3 |
| 155.0 |
| 55.0 |
| 30.0 |
|
BBB- or Baa3 (interest rate based on Company’s election through March 5, 2018) |
| 120.0 |
| 20.0 |
| 25.0 |
|
BBB or Baa2 |
| 100.0 |
| 0.0 |
| 20.0 |
|
BBB+ or Baa1 |
| 90.0 |
| 0.0 |
| 15.0 |
|
A- or A3 or higher |
| 87.5 |
| 0.0 |
| 12.5 |
|
The terms of the 2017 Term Loan include: (1) a three-year term ending in January 2020, with two one-year extension options. Theoptions; (2) multiple draws of the term loan commitments may be made within 12 months of the effective date of the 2017 Credit Agreement up to an aggregate principal amount of $325 million (subject to increase as discussed below), with no requirement to be drawn in full; provided, that, if the Company does not borrow at least 50 percent of the initial term commitment from the term lenders (i.e. 50 percent of $325 million) on or before July 25, 2017, the amount of unused term loan commitments shall be reduced on such date so that, after giving effect to such reduction, the amount of unused term loan commitments is not greater than the outstanding term loans on such date; (3) an interest rate for the new term loan is currently 140 basis points over LIBOR, subject to adjustment on a sliding scale based on the Company'sOperating Partnership’s unsecured debt ratings from Moody’s or S&P or, at the Company'sOperating Partnership’s option if it no longer maintains a debt rating from Moody’s or S&P or such debt ratings fall below Baa3 and BBB-, based on a defined leverage ratio. Theratio; and (4) a term commitment fee on any unused term loan commitment during the first 12 months after the effective date of the 2017 Credit Agreement at a rate of 0.25 percent per annum on the sum of the average daily unused portion of the aggregate term loan commitments.
On March 29, 2017, the Company entered intoexecuted interest rate swap arrangements to fix LIBOR with an aggregate average rate of 1.6473% for the duration of the term loan. Including costs, the loan provides forswaps and a current all-inaggregate fixed rate of 3.12 percent.3.0473% for borrowings under the 2017 Term Loan.
After electing to use the defined leverage ratio to determine the interest rate, the interest rate under the 2017 Term Loan is currently based on the following total leverage ratio grid:
Total Leverage Ratio |
| Interest Rate - |
| Interest Rate - |
|
<45% |
| 145.0 |
| 45.0 |
|
>45% and <50% (current ratio) |
| 155.0 |
| 55.0 |
|
>50% and <55% |
| 165.0 |
| 65.0 |
|
>55% |
| 195.0 |
| 95.0 |
|
Prior to the election to use the defined leverage ratio option, the interest rate on the 2017 Term Loan was based upon the Operating Partnership’s unsecured debt ratings, as follows:
Operating Partnership’s |
| Interest Rate - |
| Interest Rate - |
|
No ratings or less than BBB-/Baa3 |
| 185.0 |
| 85.0 |
|
BBB- or Baa3 (interest rate based on Company’s election through March 5, 2018) |
| 140.0 |
| 40.0 |
|
BBB or Baa2 |
| 115.0 |
| 15.0 |
|
BBB+ or Baa1 |
| 100.0 |
| 0.0 |
|
A- or A3 or higher |
| 90.0 |
| 0.0 |
|
On up to four occasions at any time after the effective date of the 2017 Credit Agreement, the Company may elect to request (1) an increase to the existing revolving credit commitments (any such increase, the “New Revolving Credit Commitments”) and/or (2) the establishment of one or more new term loan commitments (the “New Term Commitments”, together with the 2017 Credit Commitments, the “Incremental Commitments”), by up to an aggregate amount not to exceed $350 million for all Incremental Commitments. The proceeds fromCompany may also request that the loan were used primarilysublimit for letters of credit available under the 2017 Credit Facility be increased to repay$100 million (without arranging any New Revolving Credit Commitments). No lender or letter of credit issued has any obligation to accept any Incremental Commitment or any increase to the letter of credit subfacility. There is no premium or penalty associated with full or partial prepayment of borrowings under the 2017 Credit Agreement.
The 2017 Credit Agreement, which applies to both the 2017 Credit Facility and 2017 Term Loan, includes certain restrictions and covenants which limit, among other things the incurrence of additional indebtedness, the incurrence of liens and the disposition of real estate properties (to the extent that: (i) such property dispositions cause the Company to default on any of the financial ratios of the 2017 Credit Agreement (described below), or (ii) the property dispositions are completed while the Company is under an event of default under the 2017 Credit Agreement, unless, under certain circumstances, such disposition is being carried out to cure such default), and which require compliance with financial ratios relating to the maximum leverage ratio (60 percent), the maximum amount of secured indebtedness (40 percent), the minimum amount of fixed charge coverage (1.5 times), the maximum amount of unsecured indebtedness (60 percent), the minimum amount of unencumbered property interest coverage (2.0 times) and certain investment limitations (generally 15 percent of total capitalization). If an event of default has occurred and is continuing, the entire outstanding borrowings onbalance under the 2017 Credit Agreement may (or, in the case of any bankruptcy event of default, shall) become immediately due and payable, and the Company will not make any excess distributions except to enable the General Partner to continue to qualify as a REIT under the IRS Code.
Before it amended and restated its unsecured revolving credit facility and to repay the Company's $200 million, 5.8 percent senior unsecured notes that matured onin January 15, 2016.
Operating Partnership’s |
| Interest Rate - |
| Facility Fee |
|
No ratings or less than BBB-/Baa3 |
| 170.0 |
| 35.0 |
|
BBB- or Baa3 (since January 2017 amendment) |
| 130.0 |
| 30.0 |
|
BBB or Baa2 |
| 110.0 |
| 20.0 |
|
BBB+ or Baa1 |
| 100.0 |
| 15.0 |
|
A- or A3 or higher |
| 92.5 |
| 12.5 |
|
In January 2016, the Company obtained a $350 million unsecured term loan (“2016 Term Loan”), which matures in January 2019 with two one-year extension options. On January 7, 2019, the Company exercised the first one-year extension option with the payment of an extension fee of $0.5 million, which extended the maturity of the 2016 Term Loan to January 2020. The interest rate for the term loan is based on the Operating Partnership’s unsecured debt ratings, or, at the Company’s option, a defined leverage ratio. Effective March 6, 2018, the Company elected to determine its interest rate under the 2016 Term Loan using the defined leverage ratio option, resulting in an interest rate of LIBOR plus 155 basis points. The Company entered into interest rate swap arrangements to fix LIBOR for the duration of the term loan. Including costs, the current all-in fixed rate is 3.13 percent. The proceeds from the loan were used primarily to repay outstanding borrowings on the Company’s then existing unsecured revolving credit facility and to repay $200 million senior unsecured notes that matured on January 15, 2016.
After electing to use the defined leverage ratio to determine the interest rate, the interest rate under the 2016 Term Loan is currently based on the following total leverage ratio grid:
Total Leverage Ratio | Interest Rate - | ||
<45% | 145.0 | ||
>45% and <50% (current ratio) | 155.0 | ||
>50% and <55% | 165.0 | ||
>55% | 195.0 |
Prior to the election to use the defined leverage ratio option, the interest rate on the 2016 Term Loan was based upon the Operating Partnership’s unsecured debt ratings, as follows:
| Operating Partnership's | Interest Rate - | |||
| Unsecured Debt Ratings: | Applicable Basis Points | Facility Fee | ||
| Higher of S&P or Moody's | Above LIBOR | Basis Points | ||
| No ratings or less than BBB-/Baa3 | 170.0 | 35.0 | ||
| BBB- or Baa3 (current) | 130.0 | 30.0 | ||
| BBB or Baa2 | 110.0 | 20.0 | ||
| BBB+ or Baa1 | 100.0 | 15.0 | ||
| A- or A3 or higher | 92.5 | 12.5 |
Operating Partnership’s | Interest Rate - | ||
No ratings or less than BBB-/Baa3 | 185.0 | ||
BBB- or Baa3 (interest rate based on Company’s election through March 5, 2018) | 140.0 | ||
BBB or Baa2 | 115.0 | ||
BBB+ or Baa1 | 100.0 | ||
A- or A3 or higher | 90.0 |
The terms of the unsecured facility2016 Term Loan include certain restrictions and covenants which limit, among other things the incurrence of additional indebtedness, the incurrence of liens and the disposition of real estate properties (to the extent that: (i) such property dispositions cause the Company to default on any of the financial ratios of the facilityterm loan described below, or (ii) the property dispositions are completed while the Company is under an event of default under the facility,term loan, unless, under certain circumstances, such disposition is being carried out to cure such default), and which require compliance with financial ratios relating to the maximum leverage ratio (60 percent), the maximum amount of secured indebtedness (40 percent), the minimum amount of fixed charge coverage (1.5 times), the maximum amount of unsecured indebtedness (60 percent), the minimum amount of unencumbered property interest coverage (2.0 times) and certain investment limitations (generally 15 percent of total capitalization). If an event of default has occurred and is continuing, the Company will not make any excess distributions except to enable the CompanyGeneral Partner to continue to qualify as a REIT under the IRS Code.
On August 30, 2018, the Company had a $600 millionentered into an amendment to the 2017 Credit Agreement (the “2017 Credit Agreement Amendment”) and an amendment to the 2016 Term Loan (the “2016 Term Loan Agreement Amendment”).
Each of the 2017 Credit Agreement Amendment and the 2016 Term Loan Amendment is effective as of June 30, 2018 and provides for the following material amendments to the terms of both the 2017 Credit Agreement and 2016 Term Loan):
1. The unsecured revolving credit facility, which haddebt ratio covenant has been modified with respect to the measurement of the unencumbered collateral pool of assets in the calculation of such ratio for the period commencing July 1, 2018 and continuing until December 31, 2019 to allow the Operating Partnership to utilize the “as-is” appraised value of the properties known as ‘Harborside Plaza I’ and ‘Harborside Plaza V’ properties located in Jersey City, NJ in such calculation; and
2. A new covenant has been added that prohibits the Company from making any optional or voluntary payment, repayment, repurchase or redemption of any unsecured indebtedness of the Company (or any subsidiaries) that matures after January 25, 2022, at any time when any of the Total Leverage Ratio or the unsecured debt ratio covenants exceeds 60 percent (all as defined in the 2017 Credit Agreement and the 2016 Term Loan) or an interest rate on outstanding borrowingsappraisal is being used to determine the value of LIBOR plus 125 basis pointsHarborside Plaza I and a facility feeHarborside Plaza V for the unsecured debt ratio covenant.
All other terms and conditions of 25 basis points.
Mortgages, Loans Payable and Other Obligations:
The Company has other mortgages, loans payable and other obligations which consist of various loans collateralized by certain of the Company’s rental properties. Payments on mortgages, loans payable and other obligations are generally due in monthly installments of principal and interest, or interest only.
On January 8, 2018, the Company prepaid mortgage debt of approximately $209 million that encumbered the Company’s property at Harborside Plaza 5, for which it incurred costs of approximately $8.4 million, which is included in loss from extinguishment of debt, net, for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Debt Strategy:
The Company does not intend to reserve funds to retire the Company’s senior unsecured notes, outstanding borrowings under its unsecured revolving credit facility, its unsecured term loan,loans, or its mortgages, loans payable and other obligations upon maturity. Instead, the Company will seek to refinance such debt at maturity or retire such debt through the issuance of additional equity or debt securities on or before the applicable maturity dates. If it cannot raise sufficient proceeds to retire the maturing debt, the Company may draw on its revolving credit facility to retire the maturing indebtedness, which would reduce the future availability of funds under such facility. As of February 22, 2016,15, 2019, the Company had outstanding borrowings of $100$167 million under its unsecured revolving credit facility. The Company is reviewing various financing and refinancing options, including the redemption or purchase of itsthe Operating Partnership’s senior unsecured notes in public tender offers or privately-negotiated transactions, the issuance of additional, or exchange of current, unsecured debt of the Operating Partnership or common and preferred stock of the General Partner, and/or obtaining additional mortgage debt of the Operating Partnership, some or all of which may be completed in 2016.2019. The Company currently anticipates that its available cash and cash equivalents, cash flows from operating activities and proceeds from the sale of office properties, together with cash available from borrowings and other sources, will be adequate to meet the Company’s capital and liquidity needs in the short term. However, if these sources of funds are insufficient or unavailable, due to current economic conditions or otherwise, or if capital needs to fund acquisition and development opportunities in the multi-family rental sector arise, the Company’s ability to make the expected distributions discussed in “REIT Restrictions” above may be adversely affected.
Equity Financing and Registration Statements
Common Equity:
The following table presents the changes in the Company’sGeneral Partner’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock and the Operating Partnership’s common units from January 1, 20152018 to December 31, 2015:
| Common | Common | ||
| Stock | Units | Total | |
| Outstanding at January 1, 2015 | 89,076,578 | 11,083,876 | 100,160,454 |
| Common units redeemed for common stock | 567,032 | (567,032) | - |
| Shares issued under Dividend Reinvestment | |||
| and Stock Purchase Plan | 3,641 | - | 3,641 |
| Restricted shares issued | 45,597 | - | 45,597 |
| Cancellation of restricted shares | (108,898) | - | (108,898) |
| Outstanding at December 31, 2015 | 89,583,950 | 10,516,844 | 100,100,794 |
|
| Common |
| Common |
|
|
|
|
| Stock |
| Units |
| Total |
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2018 |
| 89,914,113 |
| 10,438,855 |
| 100,352,968 |
|
Common units redeemed for common stock |
| 264,570 |
| (264,570 | ) | — |
|
Shares issued under Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan |
| 3,227 |
| — |
| 3,227 |
|
Restricted shares and common units issued |
| 147,108 |
| — |
| 147,108 |
|
Cancellation of restricted shares |
| (8,712 | ) | — |
| (8,712 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2018 |
| 90,320,306 |
| 10,174,285 |
| 100,494,591 |
|
ShareShare/Unit Repurchase Program:
The CompanyGeneral Partner has a share repurchase program which was renewed and authorized by its Board of Directors in September 2012 to purchase up to $150 million of the Company’sGeneral Partner’s outstanding common stock (“Repurchase Program”), which it may repurchase from time to time in open market transactions at prevailing prices or through privately negotiated transactions. As of December 31, 2015,2018, the CompanyGeneral Partner has a remaining authorization under the Repurchase Program of $139 million. There were no common stock repurchases in the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 20152018 and through February 22, 2016.
Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan:
The Company has a Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (the “DRIP”) which commenced in March 1999 under which approximately 5.5 million shares of the Company’sGeneral Partner’s common stock have been reserved for future issuance. The DRIP provides for automatic reinvestment of all or a portion of a participant’s dividends from the Company’sGeneral Partner’s shares of common stock. The DRIP also permits participants to make optional cash investments up to $5,000 a month without restriction and, if the Company waives this limit, for additional amounts subject to certain restrictions and other conditions set forth in the DRIP prospectus filed as part of the Company’s effective registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for the approximately 5.5 million shares of the Company’sGeneral Partner’s common stock reserved for issuance under the DRIP.
Shelf Registration Statements:
The CompanyGeneral Partner has an effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC for an aggregate amount of $2.0 billion in common stock, preferred stock, depositary shares, and/or warrants of the Company,General Partner, under which no securities have been sold as of February 22, 2016.
The CompanyGeneral Partner and the Operating Partnership also have an effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC for an aggregate amount of $2.5 billion in common stock, preferred stock, depositary shares and guarantees of the CompanyGeneral Partner and debt securities of the Operating Partnership, under which no securities have been sold as of February 22, 2016.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Unconsolidated Joint Venture Debt:
The debt of the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures generally providesprovide for recourse to the Company for customary matters such as intentional misuse of funds, environmental conditions and material misrepresentations. The Company has agreed to guarantee repayment of a portion of the debt of its unconsolidated joint ventures. Such debt has a total facility amount of $547.6$316.9 million of which the Company has agreed to guarantee up to $74.7$35.8 million. As of December 31, 2015,2018, the outstanding balance of such debt totaled $309.9$204.9 million of which $53.1$24.6 million was guaranteed by the Company. The Company has also posted a $3.6 million letter of credit in support of the Harborside South Pier joint venture, half of which is indemnified by Hyatt Corporation, the Company’s joint venture partner.
The Company’s off-balance sheet arrangements are further discussed in Note 4: Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures to the Financial Statements.
Contractual Obligations
The following table outlines the timing of payment requirements related to the Company’s debt (principal and interest), PILOT agreements, ground lease agreements and other obligations, as of December 31, 2015:
| Payments Due by Period | |||||||||||||||||
| Less than 1 | 2 – 3 | 4 – 5 | 6 – 10 | After 10 | |||||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | Total | Year | Years | Years | Years | Years | |||||||||||
| Senior unsecured notes | $ | 1,523,519 | $ | 253,588 | $ | 339,325 | $ | 313,700 | $ | 616,906 | - | ||||||
| Revolving credit facility (a) | 159,085 | 2,580 | 156,505 | - | - | - | |||||||||||
| Mortgages, loans payable | |||||||||||||||||
| and other obligations (b) | 828,067 | 250,071 | 442,012 | 87,179 | 14,274 | $ | 34,531 | ||||||||||
| Payments in lieu of taxes | |||||||||||||||||
| (PILOT) | 28,123 | 4,407 | 13,222 | 8,815 | 1,679 | - | |||||||||||
| Ground lease payments | 16,704 | 387 | 734 | 463 | 1,172 | 13,948 | |||||||||||
| Other | 1,655 | 1,655 | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||
| Total | $ | 2,557,153 | $ | 512,688 | $ | 951,798 | $ | 410,157 | $ | 634,031 | $ | 48,479 | |||||
|
|
|
| Payments Due by Period |
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| Less than 1 |
| 2 – 3 |
| 4 – 5 |
| 6 – 10 |
| After 10 |
| ||||||
(dollars in thousands) |
| Total |
| Year |
| Years |
| Years |
| Years |
| Years |
| ||||||
Senior unsecured notes |
| $ | 661,232 |
| $ | 22,163 |
| $ | 44,325 |
| $ | 594,744 |
| $ | — |
| — |
| |
Unsecured revolving credit facility and term loans (a) |
| 813,363 |
| 365,837 | (c) | 447,526 | (d) | — |
| — |
| — |
| ||||||
Mortgages, loans payable and other obligations (b) |
| 1,649,949 |
| 261,862 | (e) | 264,822 |
| 148,218 |
| 846,327 |
| $ | 128,720 |
| |||||
Payments in lieu of taxes (PILOT) |
| 26,579 |
| 8,656 |
| 15,367 |
| 2,556 |
| — |
| — |
| ||||||
Ground lease payments |
| 222,551 |
| 2,471 |
| 4,982 |
| 4,981 |
| 12,109 |
| 198,008 |
| ||||||
Other |
| 1,250 |
| 1,250 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| ||||||
Total |
| $ | 3,374,924 |
| $ | 662,239 |
| $ | 777,022 |
| $ | 750,499 |
| $ | 858,436 |
| $ | 326,728 |
|
(a)Interest payments assume LIBOR rate |
(b): Interest payments assume LIBOR rate of 2.46 percent, which is the weighted average rate on its outstanding variable rate mortgage debt at December 31, 2018, plus the applicable spread.
(c)
(d) Includes $325 million pertaining to the Company’s Board2017 Term Loan currently maturing in January 2020, with two one-year extension options. Also includes $197 million pertaining to current borrowings on the unsecured revolving credit facility with a four-year term ending in January 2021, with two six-month extension options.
(e) Includes $172 million pertaining to various mortgages with one-year extension options.
Changes in Executive Officers:
On October 31, 2018, RRT entered into a separation and consulting agreement with Robert Andrew Marshall, the President and Executive Vice President of DirectorsDevelopment of RRT (the “Board of Directors”“Separation and Consulting Agreement”) at the 2015 annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders.. Pursuant to the termsSeparation and Consulting Agreement, Mr. Marshall’s employment with RRT was terminated, effective as of the Separation Agreement,October 31, 2018 (the “Termination Date”), and Mr. Marshall has agreed to provide consulting services to RRT and the Company elected to extendduring the separation date to June 30, 2015period beginning on November 1, 2018 and ending on March 31, 2019 (the “Separation Date”“Consulting Period”). In connection with Mr. Hersh’s departure from the Company, the Company and Mr. Hersh entered into a Separation and General Release Agreement (the “Separation Agreement”) dated November 4, 2014 (the “Effective Date”). The Separation Agreement provided that Mr. Hersh’s employment with the Company was being terminated without cause, and further provided, pursuant to the terms of Mr. Hersh’s employment agreement, multi-year performance award agreement, TSR-based performance award agreement and deferred retirement compensation agreement, for (i) a cash payment to Mr. Hersh of $8 million, (ii) payment of the premiums for the continuation of Mr. Hersh’s health, dental and vision insurance for 48 months following the Separation Date, (iii) vesting of 210,000 shares of restricted common stock pursuant to Mr. Hersh’s multi-year performance award agreement, (iv) a cash payment equal to the sum of (X) $504,000, plus (Y) the product of (1) 210,000 multiplied by (2) the aggregate amount of dividends on the Company’s common stock that were declared and paid between the Effective Date and the Separation Date in payment of accrued but unpaid dividend equivalents pursuant to his multi-year performance award agreement, (v) issuance of 41,811 shares of common stock of the Company (the “Deferred Shares”) pursuant to the acceleration of vesting of 675 performance shares pursuant to Mr. Hersh’s TSR-based performance award agreement, and (vi) a cash payment of $2,311,792 pursuant to Mr. Hersh’s deferred retirement compensation award agreement. All such cash amounts and Deferred Shares were paid to Mr. Hersh on January 4, 2016.
Under the terms of the Separation and Consulting Agreement, Mr. Hersh continuedMarshall was to receive his base salary in accordance with his employment agreement and to be eligible to participate in the Company’s executive incentive compensation and bonus programs. In addition, upon departure Mr. Hersh was entitled to receive hisfollowing separation payments:
· accrued but unpaid base salary through October 31, 2018;
· unreimbursed expenses incurred by Mr. Marshall prior to the Termination Date; and
· COBRA payments through January 31, 2019, in an aggregate amount equal to approximately $7,533.
· In addition, during the Consulting Period, Mr. Marshall will receive a monthly consulting fee of $22,500.
· Additionally, the Separation and Consulting Agreement provides that Mr. Marshall will continue to havevest during the Consulting Period in all of the 22,120 Time-Based Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards originally issued in March 2016 (the “Vested 2016 Time-Based LTIP Awards”) and 28,880 of the 35,697 Performance-Based Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards originally issued in March 2016 (the “Vested 2016 Performance-Based LTIP Awards” and, together with the Vested 2016 Time-Based LTIP Awards, the “Vested 2016 LTIP Awards”). The Vested 2016 LTIP awards will vest on the earliest to occur of (i) Mr. Marshall’s death, (ii) the termination of Mr. Marshall’s consulting services by the Company for any reason other than for Cause (as defined in the Separation and Consulting Agreement) prior to March 31, 2019 or (iii) March 8, 2019 (such earliest date, the “Vesting Date”), subject to Mr. Marshall’s continuous performance of the consulting services through the applicable Vesting Date. All other equity awards previously issued to Mr. Marshall, including the remaining 6,817 Performance-Based LTIP Awards originally issued in March 2016, 4,449 Time-Based Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards originally issued in April 2017, 13,473 Performance-Based Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards originally issued in April 2017, 11,799 Time-Based Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards originally issued in April 2018, and 22,676 Performance-Based Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards originally issued in April 2018, expired and were forfeited and cancelled, effective as of the Termination Date.
· The Separation and Consulting Agreement further provides that on the earliest to occur of (i) March 11, 2019, (ii) five (5) business days after RRT receives written notice of Mr. Marshall’s death, or (iii) the date on which Mr. Marshall’s consulting services are terminated by the Company for any reason other than for Cause, the Company will purchase from Mr. Marshall all of the Vested 2016 LTIP Awards for an aggregate purchase price in cash equal to the product of (x) the total number of Vested 2016 LTIP Awards (which will amount to a total of 51,000) and (y) the average closing price per share of the Company’s common stock, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange for the period of five trading days ending on the applicable Vesting Date.
The Company’s total estimated costs in connection with the departure of Mr. Marshall of approximately $0.1 million (net of a reversal of $0.3 million of amortization of stock compensation expense due to the forfeiture of the unvested securities) during the year ended December 31, 2018 was included in general and administrative expense (approximately $1.0 million was included in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities as of December 31, 2018).
In June 2018, the General Partner entered into a separation and general release agreement with Mitchell E. Rudin, pursuant to which Mr. Rudin’s employment with the Company as its Vice Chairman was terminated effective as of June 5, 2018.
Under the terms of the Rudin separation agreement, Mr. Rudin is entitled to receive the following separation payments:
· Accrued but unpaid base salary through June 5, 2018;
· A lump sum cash payment of $2,558,082;
· Payment of unreimbursed expenses incurred by Mr. Rudin prior to termination, in the amount of $50,000 in the aggregate; and
· COBRA payments for up to 18 months after termination, in an amount equal to approximately $34,047.
· The Rudin separation agreement reflects that certain equity awards previously issued to Mr. Rudin, including time-vesting options, restricted stock units and performance share units, vested in full as of June 5, 2018 in accordance with their terms. Pursuant to the Rudin separation agreement, other than the equity awards that were fully vested as of June 5, 2018, as set forth in the Rudin separation agreement, all other equity awards granted to Mr. Rudin, including 32,311 LTIP Units subject to time-based vesting and 175,127 LTIP Units subject to performance-based vesting, expired and were immediately forfeited and canceled, effective as of June 5, 2018.
The Company’s total estimated costs in connection with the departure of Mr. Rudin of approximately $1.2 million (net of a reversal of $1.6 million of amortization of stock compensation expense due to the forfeiture of the unvested securities) during the year ended December 31, 2018 was included in general and administrative expense (approximately $23,000 was included in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities as of December 31, 2018).
In January 2018, the Company announced the appointment of David J. Smetana as chief financial officer and Nicholas Hilton as executive vice president of leasing of the General Partner. Mr. Smetana began to perform his duties as chief financial officer and Anthony Krug ceased to serve as chief financial officer immediately following the filing of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. Mr. Krug remained an employee of the General Partner and provided transition services through March 31, 2018. Mr. Hilton’s employment commenced on February 12, 2018 following the departure of Christopher DeLorenzo. In connection with these management changes, the General Partner entered into a separation agreement and release with each of Messrs. Krug and DeLorenzo.
Under the terms of the Krug separation agreement, Mr. Krug is entitled to receive the following severance benefits:
· Earned but unpaid compensation through the date of termination, including base salary, 2017 bonus (when determined), a pro rata portion of his annual car allowance, and any unused vacation time;
· A lump sum cash severance payment of $1,312,500;
· A prorated portion of his 2018 target bonus equal to $93,750;
· COBRA payments for up to two years after termination, in an amount equal to approximately $42,000; and
· Accelerated vesting of all unvested LTIP units in the Operating Partnership, consisting of 13,306 LTIP units subject to time-based vesting and 18,665 LTIP units subject to performance-based vesting, with LTIP units subject to performance-based vesting criteria vesting at target performance.
Under the terms of the DeLorenzo separation agreement, Mr. DeLorenzo is entitled to receive the following severance benefits:
· Earned but unpaid compensation through the date of termination, including base salary, 2017 bonus (when determined), a pro rata portion of his annual car allowance, and any unused vacation time;
· A lump sum cash severance payment of $500,000;
· COBRA payments for up to 18 months after termination, in an amount equal to approximately $42,000; and
· Partial accelerated vesting of unvested LTIP units in the Operating Partnership, consisting of 9,111 LTIP units subject to time based vesting and 13,982 LTIP units subject to performance-based vesting, with LTIP units subject to performance based vesting criteria vesting at target performance.
The Company’s total estimated costs in connection with the departure of Messrs. Krug and DeLorenzo of approximately $2.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 was included in general and administrative expense (approximately $43,000 was included in accounts payable, accrued expenses reimbursed.
For further information regarding management changes in 2018, see Note 3: Recent Transactions — Management Changes — to the Financial Statements.
Funds from Operations
Funds from operations (“FFO”) (available to common stock and unit holders) is defined as net income (loss) before noncontrolling interest of unitholders,in Operating Partnership, computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding salesgains or disposals oflosses from depreciable rental property transactions (including both acquisitions and dispositions), and impairments related to depreciable rental property, plus real estate-related depreciation and amortization. The Company believes that FFO is helpful to investors as one of several measures of the performance of an equity REIT. The Company further believes that as FFO excludes the effect of depreciation, gains (or losses) from sales of propertiesproperty transactions and impairments related to depreciable rental property (all of which are based on historical costs which may be of limited relevance in evaluating current performance), FFO can facilitate comparison of operating performance between equity REITs.
FFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income available to common shareholders as an indication of the Company’s performance or to cash flows as a measure of liquidity. FFO presented herein is not necessarily comparable to FFO presented by other real estate companies due to the fact that not all real estate companies use the same definition. However, the Company’s FFO is comparable to the FFO of real estate companies that use the current definition of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”).
As the Company considers its primary earnings measure, net income available to common shareholders, as defined by GAAP, to be
|
| Year Ended December 31, |
| |||||||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
| |||
Net income available to common shareholders |
| $ | 84,111 |
| $ | 23,185 |
| $ | 117,224 |
|
Add (deduct): Noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership |
| 9,527 |
| 2,711 |
| 13,721 |
| |||
Real estate-related depreciation and amortization on continuing operations (a) |
| 190,394 |
| 223,763 |
| 204,746 |
| |||
Gain on change of control of interests |
| (14,217 | ) | — |
| (15,347 | ) | |||
Realized (gains) losses and unrealized losses on disposition of rental property, net |
| (99,436 | ) | (2,364 | ) | (109,666 | ) | |||
Gain on sale of investment in unconsolidated joint venture |
| — |
| (23,131 | ) | (5,670 | ) | |||
Funds from operations (b) |
| $ | 170,379 |
| $ | 224,164 |
| $ | 205,008 |
|
| Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||
| Net income (loss) available to common shareholders | $ | (125,752) | $ | 28,567 | $ | (14,909) | |||
| Add (deduct): Noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership | (15,256) | 3,602 | (10,459) | ||||||
| Noncontrolling interests in discontinued operations | - | - | 8,509 | ||||||
| Real estate-related depreciation and amortization on | |||||||||
| continuing operations (a) | 190,875 | 185,339 | 194,741 | ||||||
| Real estate-related depreciation and amortization | |||||||||
| on discontinued operations | - | - | 8,218 | ||||||
| Impairments | 197,919 | - | 134,704 | ||||||
| Realized (gains) losses and unrealized losses | |||||||||
| on disposition of rental property, net | (53,261) | (54,848) | (83,371) | ||||||
| Gain on sale of investment in unconsolidated | |||||||||
| joint venture | (6,448) | - | - | ||||||
| Funds from operations | $ | 188,077 | $ | 162,660 | $ | 237,433 | |||
(a) Includes the Company’s share from unconsolidated joint ventures, and adjustments for noncontrolling interest, of $17.7 million, $20.3 million and $19.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Excludes non-real estate-related depreciation and amortization of $2,139,000, $1,742,000 and $1,112,000 for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
(b) Net income available to common shareholders in 2018 included $24.6 million of land impairment charges and $30.9 million from a gain on sale of developable land, which are included in the calculation to arrive at funds from operations as such gains and charges relate to non-depreciable assets.
Inflation
The Company’s leases with the majority of its commercial tenants provide for recoveries and escalation charges based upon the tenant’s proportionate share of, and/or increases in, real estate taxes and certain operating costs, which reduce the Company’s exposure to increases in operating costs resulting from inflation. The Company believes that inflation did not materially impact the Company’s results of operations and financial condition for the periods presented.
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
We consider portions of this information, including the documents incorporated by reference, to be forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in Section 21E of such act. Such forward-looking statements relate to, without limitation, our future economic performance, plans and objectives for future operations and projections of revenue and other financial items. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “plan,” “potential,” “projected,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “target,” “continue” or comparable terminology. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to certain risks, trends and uncertainties, many of which we cannot predict with accuracy and some of which we might not even anticipate. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions at the time made, we can give no assurance that such expectations will be achieved. Future events and actual results, financial and otherwise, may differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.
Among the factors about which we have made assumptions are:
· risks and uncertainties affecting the general economic climate and conditions, which in turn may have a negative effect on the fundamentals of our business and the financial condition of our tenants and residents;
· the value of our real estate assets, which may limit our ability to dispose of assets at attractive prices or obtain or maintain debt financing secured by our properties or on an unsecured basis;
· the extent of any tenant bankruptcies or of any early lease terminations;
· our ability to lease or re-lease space at current or anticipated rents;
· changes in the supply of and demand for our properties;
· changes in interest rate levels and volatility in the securities markets;
· our ability to complete construction and development activities on time and within budget, including without limitation obtaining regulatory permits and the availability and cost of materials, labor and equipment;
· forward-looking financial and operational information, including information relating to future development projects, potential acquisitions or dispositions, leasing activities, capitalization rates, and projected revenue and income;
· changes in operating costs;
· our ability to obtain adequate insurance, including coverage for terrorist acts;
· our credit worthiness and the availability of financing on attractive terms or at all, which may adversely impact our ability to pursue acquisition and development opportunities and refinance existing debt and our future interest expense;
· changes in governmental regulation, tax rates and similar matters; and
· other risks associated with the development and acquisition of properties, including risks that the development may not be completed on schedule, that the tenants or residents will not take occupancy or pay rent, or that development or operating costs may be greater than anticipated.
For further information on factors which could impact us and the statements contained herein, see Item 1A: Risk Factors. We assume no obligation to update and supplement forward-looking statements that become untrue because of subsequent events, new information or otherwise.
ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market risk is the exposure to loss resulting from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices and equity prices. In pursuing its business plan, the primary market risk to which the Company is exposed is interest rate risk. Changes in the general level of interest rates prevailing in the financial markets may affect the spread between the Company’s yield on invested assets and cost of funds and, in turn, its ability to make distributions or payments to its investors.
Approximately $1.9$2.5 billion of the Company’s long-term debt as of December 31, 20152018 bears interest at fixed rates and therefore the fair value of these instruments is affected by changes in market interest rates. The following table presents principal cash flows (in thousands) based upon maturity dates of the debt obligations and the related weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity dates for the fixed rate debt. The interest rates on the Company’s variable rate debt as of December 31, 20152018 ranged from LIBOR plus 130 basis points to LIBOR plus 950450 basis points. Assuming interest-rate swaps and caps are not in effect, if market rates of interest on the Company’s variable rate debt increased or decreased by 100 basis points, then the increase or decrease in interest costs on the Company’s variable rate debt would be approximately $2.9$3.1 million annually and the increase or decrease in the fair value of the Company’s fixed rate debt as of December 31, 20152018 would be approximately $58$111 million.
December 31, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Debt, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Fair |
| ||||||||||
($s in thousands) |
| 2019 |
| 2020 |
| 2021 |
| 2022 |
| 2023 |
| Thereafter |
| Sub-total |
| Other (a) |
| Total |
| Value |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Fixed Rate |
| $ | 350,066 | (b) | $ | 327,903 |
| $ | 172,027 |
| $ | 303,284 |
| $ | 337,410 |
| $ | 999,159 |
| $ | 2,489,849 |
| $ | (9,359 | ) | $ | 2,480,490 |
| $ | 2,399,551 |
|
Average Interest Rate |
| 3.28 | % | 3.46 | % | 3.20 | % | 4.60 | % | 3.53 | % | 3.95 | % |
|
|
|
| 3.76 | % |
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Variable Rate |
| $ | 197,177 |
| — |
| $ | 117,000 |
| $ | — | (c) | — |
| — |
| $ | 314,177 |
| $ | (2,016 | ) | $ | 312,161 |
| $ | 312,161 |
| |||
| December 31, 2015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt, including current portion | Fair | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ($s in thousands) | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Thereafter | Sub-total | Other (a) | Total | Value | |||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed Rate | $ | 315,628 | $ | 397,493 | $ | 237,447 | $ | 307,123 | $ | 569 | $ | 610,965 | $ | 1,869,225 | $ | (6,704) | $ | 1,862,521 | $ | 1,867,635 | |||||||||
| Average Interest Rate | 8.06 | % | 4.12 | % | 6.70 | % | 7.88 | % | 4.82 | % | 4.13 | % | 5.60 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Variable Rate | $ | 98,962 | $ | 166,870 | (b) | $ | 1,400 | $ | 25,167 | $ | - | - | $ | 292,399 | - | $ | 292,399 | $ | 292,399 | ||||||||||
| (a) Adjustment for unamortized debt discount/premium, net, as of December 31, 2015. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (b) Includes $155 million of outstanding borrowings under the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility which matures in 2017 with two six-month extension options with the payment of a fee. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(a)Adjustment for unamortized debt discount/premium, net, unamortized deferred financing costs, net, and unamortized mark-to-market, net as of December 31, 2018.
(b)Includes the $350 million 2016 Term Loan originally scheduled to mature in January 2019 for which the Company exercised a one-year extension option on January 7, 2019, which extended the maturity of the 2016 Term Loan to January 2020.
(c)Includes $117 million of outstanding borrowings under the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility which, in January 2017, was amended and restated and matures in January 2021.
While the Company has not experienced any significant credit losses, in the event of a significant rising interest rate environment and/or economic downturn, defaults could increase and result in losses to the Company which could adversely affect its operating results and liquidity.
ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and the Report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, together with the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company, as set forth in the index in Item 15: Exhibits and Financial Statements, are filed under this Item 8: Financial Statements and Supplementary Data and are incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Mack-Cali Realty Corporation
Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Company’sGeneral Partner’s management, with the participation of the Company’sGeneral Partner’s chief executive officer, president and chief operating officer and chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’sGeneral Partner’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Company’sGeneral Partner’s chief executive officer, president and chief operating officer and chief financial officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company’sGeneral Partner’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the CompanyGeneral Partner in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’sGeneral Partner’s chief executive officer, president and chief operating officer and chief financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the Company’sGeneral Partner’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’sGeneral Partner’s management, with the participation of the Company’sGeneral Partner’s chief executive officer, president and chief operating officer and chief financial officer, has established
and maintained policies and procedures designed to maintain the adequacy of the Company’sGeneral Partner’s internal control over financial reporting, and includes those policies and procedures that:
(1) Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the General Partner;
(2)
(3) Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the General Partner’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
The Company’sGeneral Partner’s management has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’sGeneral Partner’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20152018 based on the criteria established in a report entitled Internal Control—Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in 2013. Based on our assessment and those criteria, the Company’sGeneral Partner’s management has concluded that the Company’sGeneral Partner’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2015.2018.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree or compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The effectiveness of the Company’sGeneral Partner’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20152018 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein.
Changes In Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes in the Company’sGeneral Partner’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fourth fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’sGeneral Partner’s internal control over financial reporting.
Mack-Cali Realty, L.P.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The General Partner’s management, with the participation of the General Partner’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Operating Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the General Partner’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Operating Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Operating Partnership in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the General Partner’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the General Partner’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The General Partner’s management, with the participation of the General Partner’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has established and maintained policies and procedures designed to maintain the adequacy of the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting, and includes those policies and procedures that:
(1) Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Operating Partnership;
(2) Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Operating Partnership are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the General Partner; and
(3) Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Operating Partnership’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
The General Partner’s management has evaluated the effectiveness of the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018 based on the criteria established in a report entitled Internal Control—Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in 2013. Based on our assessment and those criteria, the General Partner’s management has concluded that the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2018.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree or compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The effectiveness of the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein.
Changes In Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes in the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fourth fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION
The information required by Item 10 will be set forth in the Company’sGeneral Partner’s definitive proxy statement for its annual meeting of shareholders expected to be held on June 1, 2016,12, 2019, and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by Item 11 will be set forth in the Company’sGeneral Partner’s definitive proxy statement for its annual meeting of shareholders expected to be held on June 1, 2016,12, 2019, and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by Item 12 will be set forth in the Company’sGeneral Partner’s definitive proxy statement for its annual meeting of shareholders expected to be held on June 1, 2016,12, 2019, and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required by Item 13 will be set forth in the Company’sGeneral Partner’s definitive proxy statement for its annual meeting of shareholders expected to be held on June 1, 2016,12, 2019, and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by Item 14 will be set forth in the Company’sGeneral Partner’s definitive proxy statement for its annual meeting of shareholders expected to be held on June 1, 2016,12, 2019, and is incorporated herein by reference.
(a) 1.All Financial Statements
(a) 2.Financial Statement Schedules
(i)Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Mack-Cali Realty, L.P.:
Schedule III –— Real Estate Investments and Accumulated Depreciation as of December 31, 2015
Schedule IV — Mortgage Loans on Real Estate as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.
All other schedules are omitted because they are not required or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.
(a) 3.Exhibits
The exhibits required by this item are set forth on the Exhibit Index attached hereto.
ITEM 16.
of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation:
In our opinion,Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing Item 15(a)(1) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial positionbalance sheets of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively, the(the “Company”) atas of December 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, and the resultsrelated consolidated statements of their operations, comprehensive income, changes in equity and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20152018, including the related notes and financial statement schedules listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2)(i) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2)(i) presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015,2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework 2013 (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). COSO.
Basis for Opinions
The Company'sCompany’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management'sManagement’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on thesethe Company’s consolidated financial statements on the financial statement schedule, and on the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, andas well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statement presentation.statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
Definition and DisclosuresLimitations of Disposals of Components of an Entity”, which changed the criteria for reporting discontinued operations in 2014.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP | |
New York, New York | |
February 20, 2019 |
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1994.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Partners
of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P.:
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, including the related notes and financial statement schedules listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2)(i) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.
Basis for Opinions
The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP | |
New York, New York | |
February 20, 2019 |
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1998.
MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS(in (in thousands, except per share amounts)
| December 31, | |||||
| ASSETS | 2015 | 2014 | |||
| Rental property | |||||
| Land and leasehold interests | $ | 735,696 | $ | 760,855 | |
| Buildings and improvements | 3,648,238 | 3,753,300 | |||
| Tenant improvements | 408,617 | 431,969 | |||
| Furniture, fixtures and equipment | 15,167 | 12,055 | |||
| 4,807,718 | 4,958,179 | ||||
| Less – accumulated depreciation and amortization | (1,464,482) | (1,414,305) | |||
| Net investment in rental property | 3,343,236 | 3,543,874 | |||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 37,077 | 29,549 | |||
| Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures | 303,457 | 247,468 | |||
| Unbilled rents receivable, net | 120,246 | 123,885 | |||
| Deferred charges, goodwill and other assets, net | 213,377 | 204,650 | |||
| Restricted cash | 35,343 | 34,245 | |||
| Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts | |||||
| of $1,407 and $2,584 | 10,754 | 8,576 | |||
| Total assets | $ | 4,063,490 | $ | 4,192,247 | |
| LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | |||||
| Senior unsecured notes | $ | 1,268,844 | $ | 1,267,744 | |
| Revolving credit facility | 155,000 | - | |||
| Mortgages, loans payable and other obligations | 731,076 | 820,910 | |||
| Dividends and distributions payable | 15,582 | 15,528 | |||
| Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities | 135,057 | 126,971 | |||
| Rents received in advance and security deposits | 49,739 | 52,146 | |||
| Accrued interest payable | 24,484 | 26,937 | |||
| Total liabilities | 2,379,782 | 2,310,236 | |||
| Commitments and contingencies | |||||
| Equity: | |||||
| Mack-Cali Realty Corporation stockholders’ equity: | |||||
| Common stock, $0.01 par value, 190,000,000 shares authorized, | |||||
| 89,583,950 and 89,076,578 shares outstanding | 896 | 891 | |||
| Additional paid-in capital | 2,570,392 | 2,560,183 | |||
| Dividends in excess of net earnings | (1,115,612) | (936,293) | |||
| Total Mack-Cali Realty Corporation stockholders’ equity | 1,455,676 | 1,624,781 | |||
| Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries: | |||||
| Operating Partnership | 170,891 | 202,173 | |||
| Consolidated joint ventures | 57,141 | 55,057 | |||
| Total noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries | 228,032 | 257,230 | |||
| Total equity | 1,683,708 | 1,882,011 | |||
| Total liabilities and equity | $ | 4,063,490 | $ | 4,192,247 | |
|
| December 31, |
| ||||
ASSETS |
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| ||
Rental property |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Land and leasehold interests |
| $ | 807,236 |
| $ | 786,789 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
| 4,109,797 |
| 3,955,122 |
| ||
Tenant improvements |
| 335,266 |
| 330,686 |
| ||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
| 53,718 |
| 30,247 |
| ||
|
| 5,306,017 |
| 5,102,844 |
| ||
Less — accumulated depreciation and amortization |
| (1,097,868 | ) | (1,087,083 | ) | ||
|
| 4,208,149 |
| 4,015,761 |
| ||
Rental property held for sale, net |
| 108,848 |
| 171,578 |
| ||
Net investment in rental property |
| 4,316,997 |
| 4,187,339 |
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
| 29,633 |
| 28,180 |
| ||
Restricted cash |
| 19,921 |
| 39,792 |
| ||
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
| 232,750 |
| 252,626 |
| ||
Unbilled rents receivable, net |
| 100,737 |
| 100,842 |
| ||
Deferred charges, goodwill and other assets, net |
| 355,234 |
| 342,320 |
| ||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,108 and $1,138 |
| 5,372 |
| 6,786 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total assets |
| $ | 5,060,644 |
| $ | 4,957,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Senior unsecured notes, net |
| $ | 570,314 |
| $ | 569,145 |
|
Unsecured revolving credit facility and term loans |
| 790,939 |
| 822,288 |
| ||
Mortgages, loans payable and other obligations, net |
| 1,431,398 |
| 1,418,135 |
| ||
Dividends and distributions payable |
| 21,877 |
| 21,158 |
| ||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
| 168,115 |
| 192,716 |
| ||
Rents received in advance and security deposits |
| 41,244 |
| 43,993 |
| ||
Accrued interest payable |
| 9,117 |
| 9,519 |
| ||
Total liabilities |
| 3,033,004 |
| 3,076,954 |
| ||
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Redeemable noncontrolling interests |
| 330,459 |
| 212,208 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Mack-Cali Realty Corporation stockholders’ equity: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 190,000,000 shares authorized, 90,320,306 and 89,914,113 shares outstanding |
| 903 |
| 899 |
| ||
Additional paid-in capital |
| 2,561,503 |
| 2,565,136 |
| ||
Dividends in excess of net earnings |
| (1,084,518 | ) | (1,096,429 | ) | ||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
| 8,770 |
| 6,689 |
| ||
Total Mack-Cali Realty Corporation stockholders’ equity |
| 1,486,658 |
| 1,476,295 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Operating Partnership |
| 168,373 |
| 171,395 |
| ||
Consolidated joint ventures |
| 42,150 |
| 21,033 |
| ||
Total noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries |
| 210,523 |
| 192,428 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total equity |
| 1,697,181 |
| 1,668,723 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total liabilities and equity |
| $ | 5,060,644 |
| $ | 4,957,885 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS(in (in thousands, except per share amounts)
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||
| REVENUES | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||
| Base rents | $ | 487,041 | $ | 516,727 | $ | 540,165 | |||
| Escalations and recoveries from tenants | 62,481 | 78,554 | 72,758 | ||||||
| Construction services | - | - | 15,650 | ||||||
| Real estate services | 29,620 | 28,638 | 26,935 | ||||||
| Parking income | 11,124 | 9,107 | 6,840 | ||||||
| Other income | 4,617 | 3,773 | 4,683 | ||||||
| Total revenues | 594,883 | 636,799 | 667,031 | ||||||
| EXPENSES | |||||||||
| Real estate taxes | 82,688 | 90,750 | 85,574 | ||||||
| Utilities | 55,965 | 72,822 | 63,622 | ||||||
| Operating services | 107,951 | 112,621 | 105,278 | ||||||
| Direct construction costs | - | - | 14,945 | ||||||
| Real estate services expenses | 25,583 | 26,136 | 22,716 | ||||||
| General and administrative | 49,147 | 71,051 | 47,040 | ||||||
| Acquisition-related costs | 1,560 | 2,118 | 642 | ||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 170,402 | 172,490 | 182,766 | ||||||
| Impairments | 197,919 | - | 110,853 | ||||||
| Total expenses | 691,215 | 547,988 | 633,436 | ||||||
| Operating income (loss) | (96,332) | 88,811 | 33,595 | ||||||
| OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME | |||||||||
| Interest expense | (103,051) | (112,878) | (123,701) | ||||||
| Interest and other investment income | 794 | 3,615 | 2,903 | ||||||
| Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures | (3,172) | (2,423) | (2,327) | ||||||
| Realized gains (losses) on disposition of rental property, net | 53,261 | 54,848 | - | ||||||
| Gain on sale of investment in unconsolidated joint venture | 6,448 | - | - | ||||||
| Loss from early extinguishment of debt | - | (582) | (156) | ||||||
| Total other (expense) income | (45,720) | (57,420) | (123,281) | ||||||
| Income (loss) from continuing operations | (142,052) | 31,391 | (89,686) | ||||||
| Discontinued operations: | |||||||||
| Income from discontinued operations | - | - | 11,811 | ||||||
| Loss from early extinguishment of debt | - | - | (703) | ||||||
| Realized gains (losses) and unrealized losses on | |||||||||
| disposition of rental property and impairments, net | - | - | 59,520 | ||||||
| Total discontinued operations, net | - | - | 70,628 | ||||||
| Net income (loss) | (142,052) | 31,391 | (19,058) | ||||||
| Noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures | 1,044 | 778 | 2,199 | ||||||
| Noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership | 15,256 | (3,602) | 10,459 | ||||||
| Noncontrolling interest in discontinued operations | - | - | (8,509) | ||||||
| Net income (loss) available to common shareholders | $ | (125,752) | $ | 28,567 | $ | (14,909) | |||
| Basic earnings per common share: | |||||||||
| Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | (1.41) | $ | 0.32 | $ | (0.88) | |||
| Discontinued operations | - | - | 0.71 | ||||||
| Net income (loss) available to common shareholders | $ | (1.41) | $ | 0.32 | $ | (0.17) | |||
| Diluted earnings per common share: | |||||||||
| Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | (1.41) | $ | 0.32 | $ | (0.88) | |||
| Discontinued operations | - | - | 0.71 | ||||||
| Net income (loss) available to common shareholders | $ | (1.41) | $ | 0.32 | $ | (0.17) | |||
| Basic weighted average shares outstanding | 89,291 | 88,727 | 87,762 | ||||||
| Diluted weighted average shares outstanding | 100,222 | 100,041 | 99,785 | ||||||
|
| Year Ended December 31, |
| |||||||
REVENUES |
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
| |||
Base rents |
| $ | 436,222 |
| $ | 501,334 |
| $ | 506,877 |
|
Escalations and recoveries from tenants |
| 44,121 |
| 58,767 |
| 60,505 |
| |||
Real estate services |
| 17,094 |
| 23,129 |
| 26,589 |
| |||
Parking income |
| 22,117 |
| 20,270 |
| 13,630 |
| |||
Other income |
| 11,052 |
| 12,700 |
| 5,797 |
| |||
Total revenues |
| 530,606 |
| 616,200 |
| 613,398 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Real estate taxes |
| 64,555 |
| 81,364 |
| 87,379 |
| |||
Utilities |
| 39,054 |
| 42,598 |
| 49,624 |
| |||
Operating services |
| 102,626 |
| 107,379 |
| 103,954 |
| |||
Real estate services expenses |
| 17,919 |
| 23,394 |
| 26,260 |
| |||
General and administrative |
| 53,988 |
| 50,949 |
| 51,979 |
| |||
Acquisition-related costs |
| — |
| — |
| 2,880 |
| |||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 174,847 |
| 205,169 |
| 186,684 |
| |||
Land impairments |
| 24,566 |
| — |
| — |
| |||
Total expenses |
| 477,555 |
| 510,853 |
| 508,760 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Interest expense |
| (83,754 | ) | (93,388 | ) | (94,889 | ) | |||
Interest and other investment income (loss) |
| 3,389 |
| 2,766 |
| 1,614 |
| |||
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures |
| (127 | ) | (6,081 | ) | 18,788 |
| |||
Gain on change of control of interests |
| 14,217 |
| — |
| 15,347 |
| |||
Realized gains (losses) and unrealized losses on disposition of rental property, net |
| 99,436 |
| 2,364 |
| 109,666 |
| |||
Gain on disposition of developable land |
| 30,939 |
| — |
| — |
| |||
Gain on sale of investment in unconsolidated joint venture |
| — |
| 23,131 |
| 5,670 |
| |||
Loss from extinguishment of debt, net |
| (10,750 | ) | (421 | ) | (30,540 | ) | |||
Total other income (expense) |
| 53,350 |
| (71,629 | ) | 25,656 |
| |||
Net income |
| 106,401 |
| 33,718 |
| 130,294 |
| |||
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures |
| 1,216 |
| 1,018 |
| 651 |
| |||
Noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership |
| (9,527 | ) | (2,711 | ) | (13,721 | ) | |||
Redeemable noncontrolling interest |
| (13,979 | ) | (8,840 | ) | — |
| |||
Net income available to common shareholders |
| $ | 84,111 |
| $ | 23,185 |
| $ | 117,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Basic earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net income available to common shareholders |
| $ | 0.80 |
| $ | 0.06 |
| $ | 1.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Diluted earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net income available to common shareholders |
| $ | 0.80 |
| $ | 0.06 |
| $ | 1.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
| 90,388 |
| 90,005 |
| 89,746 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
| 100,724 |
| 100,703 |
| 100,498 |
| |||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTSTATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITYCOMPREHENSIVE INCOME (in thousands)
| Additional | Dividends in | Noncontrolling | |||||||||||||||
| Common Stock | Paid-In | Excess of | Interests | Total | |||||||||||||
| Shares | Par Value | Capital | Net Earnings | in Subsidiaries | Equity | ||||||||||||
| Balance at January 1, 2013 | 87,536 | $ | 875 | $ | 2,530,621 | $ | (764,522) | $ | 301,533 | $ | 2,068,507 | ||||||
| Net income (loss) | - | - | - | (14,909) | (4,149) | (19,058) | |||||||||||
| Common stock dividends | - | - | - | (118,418) | - | (118,418) | |||||||||||
| Common unit distributions | - | - | - | (16,193) | (16,193) | ||||||||||||
| Increase in noncontrolling interest | |||||||||||||||||
| in consolidated joint ventures | - | - | - | - | 1,040 | 1,040 | |||||||||||
| Redemption of common units | |||||||||||||||||
| for common stock | 277 | 3 | 5,475 | - | (5,478) | - | |||||||||||
| Shares issued under Dividend | |||||||||||||||||
| Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan | 10 | - | 243 | - | - | 243 | |||||||||||
| Directors' deferred compensation plan | - | - | 529 | - | - | 529 | |||||||||||
| Stock compensation | 425 | 4 | 1,801 | - | - | 1,805 | |||||||||||
| Rebalancing of ownership percentage | |||||||||||||||||
| between parent and subsidiaries | - | - | 657 | - | (657) | - | |||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2013 | 88,248 | $ | 882 | $ | 2,539,326 | $ | (897,849) | $ | 276,096 | $ | 1,918,455 | ||||||
| Net income (loss) | - | - | - | 28,567 | 2,824 | 31,391 | |||||||||||
| Common stock dividends | - | - | - | (67,011) | - | (67,011) | |||||||||||
| Common unit distributions | - | - | - | (8,456) | (8,456) | ||||||||||||
| Increase in noncontrolling interest | |||||||||||||||||
| in consolidated joint ventures | - | - | - | - | 552 | 552 | |||||||||||
| Redemption of common units | |||||||||||||||||
| for common stock | 781 | 8 | 14,354 | - | (14,362) | - | |||||||||||
| Shares issued under Dividend | |||||||||||||||||
| Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan | 6 | - | 118 | - | - | 118 | |||||||||||
| Directors' deferred compensation plan | - | - | 407 | - | - | 407 | |||||||||||
| Stock compensation | 42 | 1 | 6,554 | - | - | 6,555 | |||||||||||
| Rebalancing of ownership percentage | |||||||||||||||||
| between parent and subsidiaries | - | - | (576) | - | 576 | - | |||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2014 | 89,077 | $ | 891 | $ | 2,560,183 | $ | (936,293) | $ | 257,230 | $ | 1,882,011 | ||||||
| Net income (loss) | - | - | - | (125,752) | (16,300) | (142,052) | |||||||||||
| Common stock dividends | - | - | - | (53,567) | - | (53,567) | |||||||||||
| Common unit distributions | - | - | - | - | (6,505) | (6,505) | |||||||||||
| Increase in noncontrolling interest | |||||||||||||||||
| in consolidated joint ventures | - | - | - | - | 3,128 | 3,128 | |||||||||||
| Redemption of common units | |||||||||||||||||
| for common stock | 567 | 6 | 9,941 | - | (9,947) | - | |||||||||||
| Shares issued under Dividend | |||||||||||||||||
| Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan | 3 | - | 60 | - | - | 60 | |||||||||||
| Directors' deferred compensation plan | - | - | 397 | - | - | 397 | |||||||||||
| Stock compensation | 46 | - | 2,277 | - | - | 2,277 | |||||||||||
| Cancellation of restricted shares | (109) | (1) | (2,040) | - | - | (2,041) | |||||||||||
| Rebalancing of ownership percentage | |||||||||||||||||
| between parent and subsidiaries | - | - | (426) | - | 426 | - | |||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2015 | 89,584 | $ | 896 | $ | 2,570,392 | $ | (1,115,612) | $ | 228,032 | $ | 1,683,708 | ||||||
|
| Year Ended December 31, |
| |||||||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
| |||
Net income |
| $ | 106,401 |
| $ | 33,718 |
| $ | 130,294 |
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net unrealized gain on derivative instruments for interest rate swaps |
| 2,318 |
| 5,250 |
| 2,216 |
| |||
Comprehensive income |
| $ | 108,719 |
| $ | 38,968 |
| $ | 132,510 |
|
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures |
| 1,216 |
| 1,018 |
| 651 |
| |||
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest |
| (13,979 | ) | (8,840 | ) | — |
| |||
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership |
| (9,764 | ) | (3,257 | ) | (13,952 | ) | |||
Comprehensive income attributable to common shareholders |
| $ | 86,192 |
| $ | 27,889 |
| $ | 119,209 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTSSTATEMENT OF CASH FLOWSCHANGES IN EQUITY (in thousands)
| December 31, | |||||||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | (142,052) | $ | 31,391 | $ | (19,058) | |||
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by | |||||||||
| Operating activities: | |||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization, including related intangible assets | 172,108 | 173,848 | 183,303 | ||||||
| Depreciation and amortization on discontinued operations | - | - | 8,218 | ||||||
| Amortization of deferred stock units | 397 | 407 | 529 | ||||||
| Amortization of stock compensation | 2,219 | 11,097 | 2,387 | ||||||
| Amortization of deferred financing costs | 3,790 | 3,274 | 3,172 | ||||||
| Write-off of unamortized discount on senior unsecured notes | - | 12 | 156 | ||||||
| Amortization of debt discount and mark-to-market | 3,385 | 6,507 | 6,781 | ||||||
| Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated joint ventures | 3,172 | 2,423 | 2,327 | ||||||
| Distributions of cumulative earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures | 5,644 | 11,213 | 8,485 | ||||||
| Realized (gains) loss on disposition of rental property, net | (53,261) | (54,848) | (59,520) | ||||||
| Realized (gains) loss on sale of investment in unconsolidated joint venture | (6,448) | - | - | ||||||
| Impairments | 197,919 | - | 110,853 | ||||||
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | |||||||||
| Increase in unbilled rents receivable, net | (1,760) | (4,083) | (10,105) | ||||||
| Increase in deferred charges, goodwill and other assets | (22,854) | (34,402) | (31,404) | ||||||
| (Increase) decrease in accounts receivable, net | (2,178) | 355 | 248 | ||||||
| Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities | 6,960 | 15,858 | (7,090) | ||||||
| Decrease in rents received in advance and security deposits | (2,408) | (1,583) | (2,187) | ||||||
| Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable | 4,822 | (2,216) | 1,598 | ||||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 169,455 | $ | 159,253 | $ | 198,693 | |||
| CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | |||||||||
| Rental property acquisitions and related intangibles | $ | (70,455) | $ | (61,938) | $ | (178,294) | |||
| Rental property additions and improvements | (94,073) | (91,813) | (89,869) | ||||||
| Development of rental property and other related costs | (81,073) | (25,140) | (13,772) | ||||||
| Proceeds from the sales of rental property | 81,049 | 274,839 | 332,102 | ||||||
| Proceeds from the sale of investment in unconsolidated joint venture | 6,448 | - | |||||||
| Investments in notes receivable | - | (62,276) | (16,425) | ||||||
| Repayment of notes receivable | 8,250 | 62,526 | 333 | ||||||
| Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures | (78,027) | (67,325) | (86,504) | ||||||
| Distributions in excess of cumulative earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures | 6,445 | 35,901 | 23,907 | ||||||
| Increase in restricted cash | (1,098) | (14,451) | (455) | ||||||
| Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | $ | (222,534) | $ | 50,323 | $ | (28,977) | |||
| CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | |||||||||
| Borrowings from revolving credit facility | $ | 334,000 | $ | 277,328 | $ | 289,000 | |||
| Repayment of revolving credit facility | (179,000) | (277,328) | (289,000) | ||||||
| Repayment of senior unsecured notes | - | (350,000) | (100,000) | ||||||
| Proceeds of senior unsecured notes | - | - | 268,928 | ||||||
| Proceeds from mortgages and loans payable | 10,752 | 130,135 | 3,170 | ||||||
| Repayment of mortgages, loans payable and other obligations | (43,133) | (83,808) | (20,715) | ||||||
| Payment of contingent consideration | (1,167) | (5,228) | (2,755) | ||||||
| Payment of financing costs | (2,998) | (3,147) | (5,429) | ||||||
| Contributions from noncontrolling interests | 2,140 | 145 | - | ||||||
| Payment of dividends and distributions | (59,987) | (89,830) | (149,454) | ||||||
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | $ | 60,607 | $ | (401,733) | $ | (6,255) | |||
| Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | $ | 7,528 | $ | (192,157) | $ | 163,461 | |||
| Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 29,549 | 221,706 | 58,245 | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 37,077 | $ | 29,549 | $ | 221,706 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| Additional |
| Dividends in |
| Other |
| Noncontrolling |
|
|
| ||||||
|
| Common Stock |
| Paid-In |
| Excess of |
| Comprehensive |
| Interests |
| Total |
| ||||||||
|
| Shares |
| Par Value |
| Capital |
| Net Earnings |
| Income (Loss) |
| in Subsidiaries |
| Equity |
| ||||||
Balance at January 1, 2016 |
| 89,584 |
| $ | 896 |
| $ | 2,570,392 |
| $ | (1,115,612 | ) | $ | — |
| $ | 228,032 |
| $ | 1,683,708 |
|
Net income |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 117,224 |
| — |
| 13,070 |
| 130,294 |
| ||||||
Common stock dividends |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (53,796 | ) | — |
| — |
| (53,796 | ) | ||||||
Common unit distributions |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (6,619 | ) | (6,619 | ) | ||||||
Decrease in noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures |
| — |
| — |
| 414 |
| — |
| — |
| (35,544 | ) | (35,130 | ) | ||||||
Redemption of common units for common stock |
| 29 |
| — |
| 474 |
| — |
| — |
| (474 | ) | — |
| ||||||
Shares issued under Dividend |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan |
| 3 |
| — |
| 71 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 71 |
| ||||||
Directors’ deferred compensation plan |
| — |
| — |
| 372 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 372 |
| ||||||
Stock compensation |
| 85 |
| 1 |
| 3,465 |
| — |
| — |
| 2,180 |
| 5,646 |
| ||||||
Cancellation of restricted shares |
| (4 | ) | — |
| (75 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| (75 | ) | ||||||
Other comprehensive income |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 1,985 |
| 231 |
| 2,216 |
| ||||||
Rebalancing of ownership percentage between parent and subsidiaries |
| — |
| — |
| 1,360 |
| — |
| — |
| (1,360 | ) | — |
| ||||||
Balance at December 31, 2016 |
| 89,697 |
| $ | 897 |
| $ | 2,576,473 |
| $ | (1,052,184 | ) | $ | 1,985 |
| $ | 199,516 |
| $ | 1,726,687 |
|
Net income |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 23,185 |
| — |
| 10,533 |
| 33,718 |
| ||||||
Common stock dividends |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (67,430 | ) | — |
| — |
| (67,430 | ) | ||||||
Common unit distributions |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (8,629 | ) | (8,629 | ) | ||||||
Issuance of limited partner common units |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 2,793 |
| 2,793 |
| ||||||
Redeemable noncontrolling interest |
| — |
| — |
| (17,951 | ) | — |
| — |
| (10,914 | ) | (28,865 | ) | ||||||
Decrease in noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures |
| — |
| — |
| (3,756 | ) | — |
| — |
| 1,105 |
| (2,651 | ) | ||||||
Redemption of common units for common stock |
| 149 |
| 1 |
| 2,530 |
| — |
| — |
| (2,531 | ) | — |
| ||||||
Shares issued under Dividend |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan |
| 2 |
| — |
| 67 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 67 |
| ||||||
Directors’ deferred compensation plan |
| — |
| — |
| 482 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 482 |
| ||||||
Stock compensation |
| 70 |
| 1 |
| 2,814 |
| — |
| — |
| 4,632 |
| 7,447 |
| ||||||
Cancellation of restricted shares |
| (4 | ) | — |
| (146 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| (146 | ) | ||||||
Other comprehensive income |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 4,704 |
| 546 |
| 5,250 |
| ||||||
Rebalancing of ownership percentage between parent and subsidiaries |
| — |
| — |
| 4,623 |
| — |
| — |
| (4,623 | ) | — |
| ||||||
Balance at December 31, 2017 |
| 89,914 |
| $ | 899 |
| $ | 2,565,136 |
| $ | (1,096,429 | ) | $ | 6,689 |
| $ | 192,428 |
| $ | 1,668,723 |
|
Net income |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 84,111 |
| — |
| 22,290 |
| 106,401 |
| ||||||
Common stock dividends |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (72,200 | ) | — |
| — |
| (72,200 | ) | ||||||
Common unit distributions |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (9,022 | ) | (9,022 | ) | ||||||
Redeemable noncontrolling interest |
| — |
| — |
| (11,425 | ) | — |
| — |
| (15,275 | ) | (26,700 | ) | ||||||
Increase in noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 22,333 |
| 22,333 |
| ||||||
Redemption of common units for common stock |
| 264 |
| 3 |
| 4,341 |
| — |
| — |
| (4,344 | ) | — |
| ||||||
Shares issued under Dividend |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan |
| 4 |
| — |
| (37 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| (37 | ) | ||||||
Directors’ deferred compensation plan |
| — |
| — |
| 507 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 507 |
| ||||||
Stock compensation |
| 147 |
| 1 |
| 1,413 |
| — |
| — |
| 5,480 |
| 6,894 |
| ||||||
Cancellation of restricted shares |
| (9 | ) | — |
| (583 | ) | — |
| — |
| (1,453 | ) | (2,036 | ) | ||||||
Other comprehensive income |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 2,081 |
| 237 |
| 2,318 |
| ||||||
Rebalancing of ownership percentage between parent and subsidiaries |
| — |
| — |
| 2,151 |
| — |
| — |
| (2,151 | ) | — |
| ||||||
Balance at December 31, 2018 |
| 90,320 |
| $ | 903 |
| $ | 2,561,503 |
| $ | (1,084,518 | ) | $ | 8,770 |
| $ | 210,523 |
| $ | 1,697,181 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (in thousands)
|
| December 31, |
| |||||||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
| |||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net income |
| $ | 106,401 |
| $ | 33,718 |
| $ | 130,294 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Depreciation and amortization, including related intangible assets and liabilities |
| 170,284 |
| 198,674 |
| 186,549 |
| |||
Amortization of directors deferred compensation stock units |
| 507 |
| 482 |
| 372 |
| |||
Amortization of stock compensation |
| 6,894 |
| 7,447 |
| 5,646 |
| |||
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
| 5,028 |
| 4,612 |
| 4,582 |
| |||
Amortization of debt discount and mark-to-market |
| (948 | ) | (287 | ) | 1,686 |
| |||
Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated joint ventures |
| 127 |
| 6,081 |
| (18,788 | ) | |||
Distributions of cumulative earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures |
| 9,182 |
| 8,186 |
| 6,120 |
| |||
Gain on change of control of interests |
| (14,217 | ) | — |
| (15,347 | ) | |||
Realized (gains) losses and unrealized losses on disposition of rental property, net |
| (99,436 | ) | (2,364 | ) | (109,666 | ) | |||
Gain on disposition of developable land |
| (30,939 | ) | — |
| — |
| |||
Gain on sale of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
| — |
| (23,131 | ) | (5,670 | ) | |||
Loss (gain) from extinguishment of debt |
| 10,750 |
| 421 |
| (12,420 | ) | |||
Land impairments |
| 24,566 |
| — |
| — |
| |||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Increase in unbilled rents receivable, net |
| (7,519 | ) | (11,286 | ) | (12,775 | ) | |||
Increase in deferred charges, goodwill and other assets |
| (29,377 | ) | (19,710 | ) | (33,878 | ) | |||
Decrease in accounts receivable, net |
| 1,382 |
| 2,831 |
| 596 |
| |||
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
| 13,915 |
| (9,012 | ) | (14,535 | ) | |||
Increase (decrease) in rents received in advance and security deposits |
| 875 |
| (1,817 | ) | (3,297 | ) | |||
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest payable |
| (402 | ) | 1,296 |
| (9,362 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
| $ | 167,073 |
| $ | 196,141 |
| $ | 100,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Rental property acquisitions and related intangibles |
| $ | (164,838 | ) | $ | (619,350 | ) | $ | (407,869 | ) |
Rental property additions and improvements |
| (168,398 | ) | (90,068 | ) | (121,582 | ) | |||
Development of rental property and other related costs |
| (184,799 | ) | (267,845 | ) | (206,955 | ) | |||
Proceeds from the sales of rental property |
| 338,015 |
| 312,596 |
| 604,978 |
| |||
Proceeds from the sale of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
| — |
| 98,599 |
| 6,420 |
| |||
Investments in notes receivable |
| — |
| (47,049 | ) | — |
| |||
Repayment of notes receivable |
| 12,102 |
| 74,945 |
| 500 |
| |||
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures |
| (11,789 | ) | (36,060 | ) | (35,930 | ) | |||
Distributions in excess of cumulative earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures |
| 11,553 |
| 5,877 |
| 22,231 |
| |||
Proceeds from investment receivable |
| — |
| 3,625 |
| — |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net cash used in investing activities |
| $ | (168,154 | ) | $ | (564,730 | ) | $ | (138,207 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Borrowings from revolving credit facility |
| $ | 461,000 |
| $ | 730,000 |
| $ | 1,165,000 |
|
Repayment of revolving credit facility |
| (494,000 | ) | (866,000 | ) | (1,034,000 | ) | |||
Repayment of senior unsecured notes |
| — |
| (250,000 | ) | (448,339 | ) | |||
Borrowings from unsecured term loan |
| — |
| 325,000 |
| 350,000 |
| |||
Proceeds from mortgages and loans payable |
| 434,293 |
| 518,852 |
| 474,344 |
| |||
Repayment of mortgages, loans payable and other obligations |
| (418,495 | ) | (156,760 | ) | (349,426 | ) | |||
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests |
| — |
| (2,021 | ) | (37,946 | ) | |||
Issuance of redeemable noncontrolling interests, net |
| 105,000 |
| 139,002 |
| — |
| |||
Payment of financing costs |
| (3,576 | ) | (9,230 | ) | (9,414 | ) | |||
Contributions from (to) noncontrolling interests, net |
| (7,542 | ) | (19) |
| 1,065 |
| |||
Payment of dividends and distributions |
| (94,017 | ) | (77,826 | ) | (60,041 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
| $ | (17,337 | ) | $ | 350,998 |
| $ | 51,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
| $ | (18,418 | ) | $ | (17,591 | ) | $ | 13,143 |
|
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period (1) |
| 67,972 |
| 85,563 |
| 72,420 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period (2) |
| $ | 49,554 |
| $ | 67,972 |
| $ | 85,563 |
|
(1) Includes Restricted Cash of $39,792, $53,952 and $35,343 as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, pursuant to the adoption of ASU 2016-15.
(2) Includes Restricted Cash of $19,921, $39,792 and $53,952 as of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, pursuant to the adoption of ASU 2016-15.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
MACK-CALI REALTY, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (in thousands, except per unit amounts)
|
| December 31, |
| ||||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| ||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Rental property |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Land and leasehold interests |
| $ | 807,236 |
| $ | 786,789 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
| 4,109,797 |
| 3,955,122 |
| ||
Tenant improvements |
| 335,266 |
| 330,686 |
| ||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
| 53,718 |
| 30,247 |
| ||
|
| 5,306,017 |
| 5,102,844 |
| ||
Less — accumulated depreciation and amortization |
| (1,097,868 | ) | (1,087,083 | ) | ||
|
| 4,208,149 |
| 4,015,761 |
| ||
Rental property held for sale, net |
| 108,848 |
| 171,578 |
| ||
Net investment in rental property |
| 4,316,997 |
| 4,187,339 |
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
| 29,633 |
| 28,180 |
| ||
Restricted cash |
| 19,921 |
| 39,792 |
| ||
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
| 232,750 |
| 252,626 |
| ||
Unbilled rents receivable, net |
| 100,737 |
| 100,842 |
| ||
Deferred charges, goodwill and other assets, net |
| 355,234 |
| 342,320 |
| ||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,108 and $1,138 |
| 5,372 |
| 6,786 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total assets |
| $ | 5,060,644 |
| $ | 4,957,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Senior unsecured notes, net |
| $ | 570,314 |
| $ | 569,145 |
|
Unsecured revolving credit facility and term loans |
| 790,939 |
| 822,288 |
| ||
Mortgages, loans payable and other obligations, net |
| 1,431,398 |
| 1,418,135 |
| ||
Distributions payable |
| 21,877 |
| 21,158 |
| ||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
| 168,115 |
| 192,716 |
| ||
Rents received in advance and security deposits |
| 41,244 |
| 43,993 |
| ||
Accrued interest payable |
| 9,117 |
| 9,519 |
| ||
Total liabilities |
| 3,033,004 |
| 3,076,954 |
| ||
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Redeemable noncontrolling interests |
| 330,459 |
| 212,208 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Partners’ Capital: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
General Partner, 90,320,306 and 89,914,113 common units outstanding |
| 1,413,497 |
| 1,407,366 |
| ||
Limited partners, 10,174,285 and 10,438,855 common units outstanding |
| 232,764 |
| 233,635 |
| ||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
| 8,770 |
| 6,689 |
| ||
Total Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. partners’ capital |
| 1,655,031 |
| 1,647,690 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated joint ventures |
| 42,150 |
| 21,033 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total equity |
| 1,697,181 |
| 1,668,723 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total liabilities and equity |
| $ | 5,060,644 |
| $ | 4,957,885 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
MACK-CALI REALTY, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (in thousands, except per unit amounts)
|
| Year Ended December 31, |
| |||||||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
| |||
REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Base rents |
| $ | 436,222 |
| $ | 501,334 |
| $ | 506,877 |
|
Escalations and recoveries from tenants |
| 44,121 |
| 58,767 |
| 60,505 |
| |||
Real estate services |
| 17,094 |
| 23,129 |
| 26,589 |
| |||
Parking income |
| 22,117 |
| 20,270 |
| 13,630 |
| |||
Other income |
| 11,052 |
| 12,700 |
| 5,797 |
| |||
Total revenues |
| 530,606 |
| 616,200 |
| 613,398 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Real estate taxes |
| 64,555 |
| 81,364 |
| 87,379 |
| |||
Utilities |
| 39,054 |
| 42,598 |
| 49,624 |
| |||
Operating services |
| 102,626 |
| 107,379 |
| 103,954 |
| |||
Real estate services expenses |
| 17,919 |
| 23,394 |
| 26,260 |
| |||
General and administrative |
| 53,988 |
| 50,949 |
| 51,979 |
| |||
Acquisition-related costs |
| — |
| — |
| 2,880 |
| |||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 174,847 |
| 205,169 |
| 186,684 |
| |||
Land Impairments |
| 24,566 |
| — |
| — |
| |||
Total expenses |
| 477,555 |
| 510,853 |
| 508,760 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Interest expense |
| (83,754 | ) | (93,388 | ) | (94,889 | ) | |||
Interest and other investment income (loss) |
| 3,389 |
| 2,766 |
| 1,614 |
| |||
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures |
| (127 | ) | (6,081 | ) | 18,788 |
| |||
Gain on change of control of interests |
| 14,217 |
| — |
| 15,347 |
| |||
Realized gains (losses) and unrealized losses on disposition of rental property, net |
| 99,436 |
| 2,364 |
| 109,666 |
| |||
Gain on disposition of developable land |
| 30,939 |
| — |
| — |
| |||
Gain on sale of investment in unconsolidated joint venture |
| — |
| 23,131 |
| 5,670 |
| |||
Loss from extinguishment of debt, net |
| (10,750 | ) | (421 | ) | (30,540 | ) | |||
Total other income (expense) |
| 53,350 |
| (71,629 | ) | 25,656 |
| |||
Net income |
| 106,401 |
| 33,718 |
| 130,294 |
| |||
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures |
| 1,216 |
| 1,018 |
| 651 |
| |||
Redeemable noncontrolling interest |
| (13,979 | ) | (8,840 | ) | — |
| |||
Net income available to common unitholders |
| $ | 93,638 |
| $ | 25,896 |
| $ | 130,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Basic earnings per common unit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net income available to common unitholders |
| $ | 0.80 |
| $ | 0.06 |
| $ | 1.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Diluted earnings per common unit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net income available to common unitholders |
| $ | 0.80 |
| $ | 0.06 |
| $ | 1.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Basic weighted average units outstanding |
| 100,634 |
| 100,410 |
| 100,245 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Diluted weighted average units outstanding |
| 100,724 |
| 100,703 |
| 100,498 |
| |||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
MACK-CALI REALTY, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (in thousands)
|
| Year Ended December 31, |
| |||||||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
| |||
Net income |
| $ | 106,401 |
| $ | 33,718 |
| $ | 130,294 |
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net unrealized gain on derivative instruments for interest rate swaps |
| 2,318 |
| 5,250 |
| 2,216 |
| |||
Comprehensive income |
| $ | 108,719 |
| $ | 38,968 |
| $ | 132,510 |
|
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures |
| 1,216 |
| 1,018 |
| 651 |
| |||
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest |
| (13,979 | ) | (8,840 | ) | — |
| |||
Comprehensive income attributable to common unitholders |
| $ | 95,956 |
| $ | 31,146 |
| $ | 133,161 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
MACK-CALI REALTY, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Accumulated |
| Noncontrolling |
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| General Partner |
| Limited Partner |
| Other |
| Interest |
|
|
| |||||
|
| General Partner |
| Limited Partner |
| Common |
| Common |
| Comprehensive |
| in Consolidated |
|
|
| |||||
|
| Common Units |
| Common Units |
| Unitholders |
| Unitholders |
| Income (Loss) |
| Joint Ventures |
| Total Equity |
| |||||
Balance at January 1, 2016 |
| 89,584 |
| 10,517 |
| $ | 1,399,419 |
| $ | 227,148 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 57,141 |
| $ | 1,683,708 |
|
Net income |
| — |
| — |
| 117,224 |
| 13,721 |
| — |
| (651 | ) | 130,294 |
| |||||
Distributions |
| — |
| — |
| (53,796 | ) | (6,619 | ) | — |
| — |
| (60,415 | ) | |||||
Decrease in noncontrolling interest |
| — |
| — |
| 414 |
| — |
| — |
| (35,544 | ) | (35,130 | ) | |||||
Redemption of limited partner common units for shares of general partner common units |
| 29 |
| (29 | ) | 474 |
| (474 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| |||||
Shares issued under Dividend |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Reinvestment and Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Purchase Plan |
| 3 |
| — |
| 71 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 71 |
| |||||
Directors’ deferred compensation plan |
| — |
| — |
| 372 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 372 |
| |||||
Other comprehensive income |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 231 |
| 1,985 |
| — |
| 2,216 |
| |||||
Stock compensation |
| 85 |
| — |
| 3,466 |
| 2,180 |
| — |
| — |
| 5,646 |
| |||||
Cancellation of restricted shares |
| (4 | ) | — |
| (75 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| (75 | ) | |||||
Balance at December 31, 2016 |
| 89,697 |
| 10,488 |
| $ | 1,467,569 |
| $ | 236,187 |
| $ | 1,985 |
| $ | 20,946 |
| $ | 1,726,687 |
|
Net income |
| — |
| — |
| 23,185 |
| 2,711 |
| — |
| 7,822 |
| 33,718 |
| |||||
Distributions |
| — |
| — |
| (67,430 | ) | (8,629 | ) | — |
| — |
| (76,059 | ) | |||||
Issuance of limited partner common units |
| — |
| 99 |
| — |
| 2,793 |
| — |
| — |
| 2,793 |
| |||||
Redeemable noncontrolling interest |
| — |
| — |
| (17,951 | ) | (2,074 | ) | — |
| (8,840 | ) | (28,865 | ) | |||||
Decrease in noncontrolling interest |
| — |
| — |
| (3,756 | ) | — |
| — |
| 1,105 |
| (2,651 | ) | |||||
Redemption of limited partner common units for shares of general partner common units |
| 149 |
| (149 | ) | 2,531 |
| (2,531 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| |||||
Shares issued under Dividend |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Reinvestment and Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Purchase Plan |
| 2 |
| — |
| 67 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 67 |
| |||||
Directors’ deferred compensation plan |
| — |
| — |
| 482 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 482 |
| |||||
Other comprehensive income |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 546 |
| 4,704 |
| — |
| 5,250 |
| |||||
Stock compensation |
| 70 |
| — |
| 2,815 |
| 4,632 |
| — |
| — |
| 7,447 |
| |||||
Cancellation of restricted shares |
| (4 | ) | — |
| (146 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| (146 | ) | |||||
Balance at December 31, 2017 |
| 89,914 |
| 10,438 |
| $ | 1,407,366 |
| $ | 233,635 |
| $ | 6,689 |
| $ | 21,033 |
| $ | 1,668,723 |
|
Net income |
| — |
| — |
| 84,111 |
| 9,527 |
| — |
| 12,763 |
| 106,401 |
| |||||
Distributions |
| — |
| — |
| (72,200 | ) | (9,022 | ) | — |
| — |
| (81,222 | ) | |||||
Redeemable noncontrolling interest |
| — |
| — |
| (11,425 | ) | (1,296 | ) | — |
| (13,979 | ) | (26,700 | ) | |||||
Decrease in noncontrolling interest |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 22,333 |
| 22,333 |
| |||||
Redemption of limited partner common units for shares of general partner common units |
| 264 |
| (264 | ) | 4,344 |
| (4,344 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| |||||
Shares issued under Dividend |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Reinvestment and Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Purchase Plan |
| 4 |
| — |
| (37 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| (37 | ) | |||||
Directors’ deferred compensation plan |
| — |
| — |
| 507 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 507 |
| |||||
Other comprehensive income |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 237 |
| 2,081 |
| — |
| 2,318 |
| |||||
Stock compensation |
| 147 |
| — |
| 1,414 |
| 5,480 |
| — |
| — |
| 6,894 |
| |||||
Cancellation of restricted shares |
| (9 | ) | — |
| (583 | ) | (1,453 | ) | — |
| — |
| (2,036 | ) | |||||
Balance at December 31, 2018 |
| 90,320 |
| 10,174 |
| $ | 1,413,497 |
| $ | 232,764 |
| $ | 8,770 |
| $ | 42,150 |
| $ | 1,697,181 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
MACK-CALI REALTY, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (in thousands)
|
| December 31, |
| |||||||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
| |||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net income |
| $ | 106,401 |
| $ | 33,718 |
| $ | 130,294 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Depreciation and amortization, including related intangible assets and liabilities |
| 170,284 |
| 198,674 |
| 186,549 |
| |||
Amortization of directors deferred compensation stock units |
| 507 |
| 482 |
| 372 |
| |||
Amortization of stock compensation |
| 6,894 |
| 7,447 |
| 5,646 |
| |||
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
| 5,028 |
| 4,612 |
| 4,582 |
| |||
Amortization of debt discount and mark-to-market |
| (948 | ) | (287 | ) | 1,686 |
| |||
Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated joint ventures |
| 127 |
| 6,081 |
| (18,788 | ) | |||
Distributions of cumulative earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures |
| 9,182 |
| 8,186 |
| 6,120 |
| |||
Gain on change of control of interests |
| (14,217 | ) | — |
| (15,347 | ) | |||
Realized (gains) losses and unrealized losses on disposition of rental property, net |
| (99,436 | ) | (2,364 | ) | (109,666 | ) | |||
Gain on disposition of developable land |
| (30,939 | ) | — |
| — |
| |||
Gain on sale of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
| — |
| (23,131 | ) | (5,670 | ) | |||
Loss (gain) from extinguishment of debt |
| 10,750 |
| 421 |
| (12,420 | ) | |||
Land impairments |
| 24,566 |
| — |
| — |
| |||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Increase in unbilled rents receivable, net |
| (7,519 | ) | (11,286 | ) | (12,775 | ) | |||
Increase in deferred charges, goodwill and other assets |
| (29,377 | ) | (19,710 | ) | (33,878 | ) | |||
Decrease in accounts receivable, net |
| 1,382 |
| 2,831 |
| 596 |
| |||
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
| 13,915 |
| (9,012 | ) | (14,535 | ) | |||
Increase (decrease) in rents received in advance and security deposits |
| 875 |
| (1,817 | ) | (3,297 | ) | |||
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest payable |
| (402 | ) | 1,296 |
| (9,362 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
| $ | 167,073 |
| $ | 196,141 |
| $ | 100,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Rental property acquisitions and related intangibles |
| $ | (164,838 | ) | $ | (619,350 | ) | $ | (407,869 | ) |
Rental property additions and improvements |
| (168,398 | ) | (90,068 | ) | (121,582 | ) | |||
Development of rental property and other related costs |
| (184,799 | ) | (267,845 | ) | (206,955 | ) | |||
Proceeds from the sales of rental property |
| 338,015 |
| 312,596 |
| 604,978 |
| |||
Proceeds from the sale of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
| — |
| 98,599 |
| 6,420 |
| |||
Investments in notes receivable |
| — |
| (47,049 | ) | — |
| |||
Repayment of notes receivable |
| 12,102 |
| 74,945 |
| 500 |
| |||
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures |
| (11,789 | ) | (36,060 | ) | (35,930 | ) | |||
Distributions in excess of cumulative earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures |
| 11,553 |
| 5,877 |
| 22,231 |
| |||
Proceeds from investment receivable |
| — |
| 3,625 |
| — |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net cash used in investing activities |
| $ | (168,154 | ) | $ | (564,730 | ) | $ | (138,207 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Borrowings from revolving credit facility |
| $ | 461,000 |
| $ | 730,000 |
| $ | 1,165,000 |
|
Repayment of revolving credit facility |
| (494,000 | ) | (866,000 | ) | (1,034,000 | ) | |||
Repayment of senior unsecured notes |
| — |
| (250,000 | ) | (448,339 | ) | |||
Borrowings from unsecured term loan |
| — |
| 325,000 |
| 350,000 |
| |||
Proceeds from mortgages and loans payable |
| 434,293 |
| 518,852 |
| 474,344 |
| |||
Repayment of mortgages, loans payable and other obligations |
| (418,495 | ) | (156,760 | ) | (349,426 | ) | |||
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests |
| — |
| (2,021 | ) | (37,946 | ) | |||
Issuance of redeemable noncontrolling interests, net |
| 105,000 |
| 139,002 |
| — |
| |||
Payment of financing costs |
| (3,576 | ) | (9,230 | ) | (9,414 | ) | |||
Contributions from (to) noncontrolling interests, net |
| (7,542 | ) | (19) |
| 1,065 |
| |||
Payment of distributions |
| (94,017 | ) | (77,826 | ) | (60,041 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
| $ | (17,337 | ) | $ | 350,998 |
| $ | 51,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
| $ | (18,418 | ) | $ | (17,591 | ) | $ | 13,143 |
|
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period (1) |
| 67,972 |
| 85,563 |
| 72,420 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period (2) |
| $ | 49,554 |
| $ | 67,972 |
| $ | 85,563 |
|
(1) Includes Restricted Cash of $39,792, $53,952 and $35,343 as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, pursuant to the adoption of ASU 2016-15.
(2) Includes Restricted Cash of $19,921, $39,792 and $53,952 as of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, pursuant to the adoption of ASU 2016-15.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION, MACK-CALI REALTY, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(square (square footage, and apartment unit, room, and building counts unaudited)
Mack-Cali Realty Corporation, a Maryland corporation, together with its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”“General Partner”), is a fully-integrated, self-administered, self-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”). The General Partner controls Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, together with its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Operating Partnership”), as its sole general partner and owned an 89.8 percent and 89.6 percent common unit interest in the Operating Partnership as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. The General Partner’s business is the ownership of interests in and operation of the Operating Partnership and all of the General Partner’s expenses are incurred for the benefit of the Operating Partnership. The General Partner is reimbursed by the Operating Partnership for all expenses it incurs relating to the ownership and operation of the Operating Partnership.
The Operating Partnership conducts the business of providing leasing, management, acquisition, development, construction and tenant-related services for its propertiesGeneral Partner. The Operating Partnership, through its operating divisions and third parties. subsidiaries, including the Mack-Cali property-owning partnerships and limited liability companies, is the entity through which all of the General Partner’s operations are conducted. Unless stated otherwise or the context requires, the “Company” refers to the General Partner and its subsidiaries, including the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries.
As of December 31, 2015,2018, the Company owned or had interests in 275135 properties, consisting of 14756 office and 10955 flex properties, totaling approximately 29.915.4 million square feet, leased to approximately 1,900700 commercial tenants, and 1924 multi-family rental properties containing 5,644 residential6,910 apartment units, plus developable land (collectively, the “Properties”). The Properties are comprised of 14756 office buildings totaling approximately 24.612.6 million square feet (which include 36four buildings aggregating approximately 5.60.5 million square feet owned by unconsolidated joint ventures in which the Company has investment interests), 9447 office/flex buildings totaling approximately 4.82.7 million square feet, six industrial/warehouse buildings totaling approximately 387,400 square feet, 1924 multi-family properties totaling 5,644 apartments6,910 apartment units (which include 13eight properties aggregating 4,343 apartments2,922 apartment units owned by unconsolidated joint ventures in which the Company has investment interests), fivesix parking/retail properties totaling approximately 121,700137,100 square feet (which include two buildings aggregating 81,700 square feet owned by unconsolidated joint ventures in which the Company has investment interests), onea hotel (which is owned by an unconsolidated joint venture in which the Company has an investment interest) and three parcelsa parcel of land leased to others. The Properties are located in sevensix states, primarily in the Northeast, plus the District of Columbia.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include all accounts of the Company, its majority-owned and/or controlled subsidiaries, which consist principally of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”),the Operating Partnership and variable interest entities for which the Company has determined itself to be the primary beneficiary, if any. See Note 2: Significant Accounting Policies –— Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures, for the Company’s treatment of unconsolidated joint venture interests. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 810, Consolidation, provides guidance on the identification of entities for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights (“variable interest entities” or “VIEs”) and the determination of which business enterprise, if any, should consolidate the VIEs. Generally, the consideration of whether an entity is a VIE applies when either: (1) the equity investors (if any) lack (i) the ability to make decisions about the entity'sentity’s activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; (2) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support; or (3) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportionate to their economic interests and substantially all of the activities of the entity involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor with a disproportionately small voting interest. The Company consolidates VIEs in which it is considered to be the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary is defined by the entity having both of the following characteristics: (1) the power to direct the activities that, when taken together, most significantly impact the variable interest entity’s performance: and (2) the obligation to absorb losses and right to receive the returns from the VIE that would be significant to the VIE.
On January 1, 2016, the Company adopted accounting guidance under ASC 810, Consolidation, modifying the analysis it must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. The guidance does not amend the existing disclosure requirements for variable interest entities or voting interest model entities. The guidance, however, modified the requirements to qualify under the voting interest model. Under the revised guidance, the Operating Partnership will be a variable interest entity of the parent company, Mack-Cali Realty Corporation. As the Operating Partnership is already consolidated in the balance sheets of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation, the identification of this entity as a variable interest entity has no impact on the consolidated financial statements of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation. There were no other legal entities qualifying under the scope of the revised guidance that were consolidated as a result of the adoption.
As of December 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, the Company’s investments in consolidated real estate joint ventures, which are variable interest entities in which the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary, other than Roseland Residential, L.P. (See Note 3: Rockpoint Transaction), have total real estate assets of $273.4$480.4 million and $242.9$215.5 million, respectively, mortgages of $89.5$241.5 million and $94.3$81.2 million, respectively, and other liabilities of $17.5$23 million and $15.7$19.3 million, respectively.
The financial statements have been prepared in conformity with GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates and assumptions are based on management’s historical experience that are believed to be reasonable at the time. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, the determination of estimates requires the exercise of judgment. The Company’s critical accounting policies are those which require assumptions to be made about matters that are highly uncertain. Different estimates could have a material effect on the Company’s financial results. Judgments and uncertainties affecting the application of these policies and estimates may result in materially different amounts being reported under different conditions and circumstances.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Rental Property | Rental properties are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Costs directly related to the acquisition, development and construction of rental properties are capitalized. Included in net investment in rental property as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 is real estate and building and tenant improvements not in service; as follows (dollars in thousands): |
|
|
| December 31, |
| December 31, |
| ||
|
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| ||
| Land held for development (including pre-development costs) (a) |
| $ | 465,930 |
| $ | 483,432 |
|
| Development and construction in progress, including land (b) |
| 327,039 |
| 535,971 |
| ||
| Total |
| $ | 792,969 |
| $ | 1,019,403 |
|
(a) Includes predevelopment and infrastructure costs included in buildings and improvements of $204.9 million and $188.1 million as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. (b) Includes land of $49.6 million and $77.0 million as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. | |
The Company considers a construction project as substantially completed and held available for occupancy upon the substantial completion of improvements, but no later than one year from cessation of major construction activity (as distinguished from activities such as routine maintenance and cleanup). If portions of a rental project are substantially completed and occupied by tenants or residents, or held available for occupancy, and other portions have not yet reached that stage, the substantially completed portions are accounted for as a separate project. The Company allocates costs incurred between the portions under construction and the portions substantially completed and held available for occupancy, primarily based on a percentage of the relative commercial square footage or multi-family units of each portion, and capitalizes only those costs associated with the portion under construction. |
Properties are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful lives are as follows: |
Leasehold interests | Remaining lease term | ||
Buildings and improvements | 5 to 40 years | ||
Tenant improvements | The shorter of the term of the | ||
| related lease or useful life | |||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment | 5 to 10 years |
Upon acquisition of rental property, the Company estimates the fair value of acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities assumed, generally consisting of the fair value of (i) above and below-market leases, (ii) in-place leases and (iii) tenant relationships. The Company allocates the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their relative fair values. The Company records goodwill or a gain on bargain purchase (if any) if the net assets acquired/liabilities assumed differ from the purchase consideration of a business transaction. In estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired, the Company considers information obtained about each property as a result of its due diligence and marketing and leasing activities, and utilizes various valuation methods, such as estimated cash flow projections utilizing appropriate discount and capitalization rates, estimates of replacement costs net of depreciation, and available market information. The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property considers the value of the property as if it were vacant. Above-market and below-market lease values for acquired properties are initially recorded based on the present value (using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to each in-place lease and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for each corresponding in-place lease, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above-market leases and the remaining initial term plus the term of any below-market fixed rate renewal options for below-market leases. The capitalized above-market lease values are amortized as a reduction of base rental revenue over the remaining terms of the respective leases, and the capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to base rental revenue over the remaining initial terms plus the terms of any below-market fixed rate renewal options of the respective leases. Other intangible assets acquired include amounts for in-place lease values and tenant relationship values, which are based on management’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and the Company’s overall relationship with the respective tenant. Factors to be considered by management in its analysis of in-place lease values include an estimate of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions, and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, management includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up periods, depending on local market conditions. In estimating costs to execute similar leases, management considers leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses. Characteristics considered by management in valuing tenant relationships include the nature and extent of the Company’s existing business relationships with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenant’s credit quality and expectations of lease renewals. The value of in-place leases are amortized to expense over the remaining initial terms of the respective leases. The value of tenant relationship intangibles are amortized to expense over the anticipated life of the relationships or leases. On a periodic basis, management assesses whether there are any indicators that the value of the Company’s rental properties held for use may be impaired. In addition to identifying any specific circumstances which may affect a property or properties, management considers other criteria for determining which properties may require assessment for potential impairment. The criteria considered by management include reviewing low leased percentages, significant near-term lease expirations, current and historical operating and/or cash flow losses, near-term mortgage debt maturities and/or other factors, including those that might impact the Company’s intent and ability to hold the property. A property’s value is impaired only if management’s estimate of the aggregate future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) to be generated by the property is less than the carrying value of the property. To the extent impairment has occurred, the impairment loss shall be measured as the excess of the carrying value of the property over the fair value of the property. The Company’s estimates of aggregate future cash flows expected to be generated by each property are based on a number of assumptions. These assumptions are generally based on management’s experience in its local real estate markets and the effects of |
current market conditions. The assumptions are subject to economic and market uncertainties including, among others, demand for space, competition for tenants, changes in market rental rates, and costs to operate each property. As these factors are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may alter management’s assumptions, the future cash flows estimated by management in its impairment analyses may not be achieved, and actual losses or impairments may be realized in the future. | |
Rental Property |
| Held for Sale | When assets are identified by management as held for sale, the Company discontinues depreciating the assets and estimates the sales price, net of selling costs, of such assets. The Company generally considers assets to be held for sale when the transaction has received appropriate corporate authority, and there are no significant contingencies relating to the sale. If, in management’s opinion, the estimated net sales price, net of selling costs, of the assets which have been identified as held for sale is less than the carrying value of the assets, a valuation allowance (which is recorded as unrealized losses on disposition of rental property) is established. |
If circumstances arise that previously were considered unlikely and, as a result, the Company decides not to sell a property previously classified as held for sale, the property is reclassified as held and used. A property that is reclassified is measured and recorded individually at the lower of (a) its carrying value before the property was classified as held for sale, adjusted for any depreciation (amortization) expense that would have been recognized had the property been continuously classified as held and used, or (b) the fair value at the date of the subsequent decision not to sell. | |
Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | The Company accounts for its investments in unconsolidated joint ventures under the equity method of accounting. The Company applies the equity method by initially recording these investments at cost, as Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures, subsequently adjusted for equity in earnings and cash contributions and distributions. The outside basis portion of the Company’s joint ventures is amortized over the anticipated useful lives of the underlying ventures’ tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Generally, the Company would discontinue applying the equity method when the investment (and any advances) is reduced to zero and would not provide for additional losses unless the Company has guaranteed obligations of the venture or is otherwise committed to providing further financial support for the investee. If the venture subsequently generates income, the Company only recognizes its share of such income to the extent it exceeds its share of previously unrecognized losses. |
If the venture subsequently makes distributions and the Company does not have an implied or actual commitment to support the operations of the venture, including a general partner interest in the investee, the Company will not record a basis less than zero, rather such amounts will be recorded as equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures. | |
On a periodic basis, management assesses whether there are any indicators that the value of the Company’s investments in unconsolidated joint ventures may be impaired. An investment is impaired only if management’s estimate of the value of the investment is less than the carrying value of the investment, and such decline in value is deemed to be other than temporary. To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss shall be measured as the excess of the carrying value of the investment over the value of the investment. The Company’s estimates of value for each investment (particularly in real estate joint ventures) are based on a number of assumptions that are subject to economic and market uncertainties including, among others, demand for space, competition for tenants, changes in market rental rates, and operating costs. As these factors are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may alter management’s assumptions, the values estimated by management in its impairment analyses may not be realized, and actual losses or impairment may be realized in the future. See Note 4: Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures. | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
All highly liquid investments with |
Deferred Financing Costs | Costs incurred in obtaining financing are capitalized and amortized over the term of the related indebtedness. |
Deferred Leasing Costs | Costs incurred in connection with successfully executed commercial and residential leases are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related leases and included in depreciation and amortization. Unamortized deferred leasing costs are charged to amortization expense upon early termination of the lease. Certain employees of the Company are compensated for providing leasing services to the Properties. The portion of such compensation related to commercial leases, which is capitalized and amortized, |
Goodwill | Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net tangible and intangible assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill is allocated to various reporting units, as applicable. Each of the Company’s segments consists of a reporting unit. Goodwill is not amortized. Management performs an annual impairment test for goodwill during the fourth quarter and between annual tests, management evaluates the recoverability of goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of goodwill may not be fully recoverable. In its impairment tests of goodwill, management first assesses qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. If, based on this assessment, management determines that the fair value of the reporting unit is not less than its carrying value, then performing the additional two-step impairment test is unnecessary. If the carrying value of goodwill exceeds its fair value, an impairment charge is recognized. The Company determined that its goodwill, with a balance of $2.9 million, was not impaired at December 31, |
Derivative Instruments | The Company measures derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, at fair value and records them as an asset or liability, depending on the Company’s rights or obligations under the applicable derivative contract. For derivatives designated and qualifying as fair value hedges, the changes in the fair value of both the derivative instrument and the hedged item are recorded in earnings. For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portions of the derivative are reported in other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and are subsequently reclassified into earnings when the hedged item affects earnings. Changes in fair value of derivative instruments not designated as hedging and ineffective portions of hedges are recognized in earnings in the affected period. |
Revenue Recognition | Base rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases. Unbilled rents receivable represents the cumulative amount by which straight-line rental revenue exceeds rents currently billed in accordance with the lease agreements. |
Above-market and below-market lease values for acquired properties are initially recorded based on the present value (using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to each in-place lease and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for each corresponding in-place lease, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above-market leases and the remaining initial term plus the term of any below-market fixed-rate renewal options for below-market leases. The capitalized above-market lease values for acquired properties are amortized as a reduction of base rental revenue over the remaining terms of the respective leases, and the capitalized below- |
market lease values are amortized as an increase to base rental revenue over the remaining initial terms plus the terms of any below-market fixed-rate renewal options of the respective leases. | |
Escalations and recoveries from tenants are received from tenants for certain costs as provided in the lease agreements. These costs generally include real estate taxes, utilities, insurance, common area maintenance and other recoverable costs. See Note 13: Tenant Leases. | |
Real estate services revenue includes property management, development, construction and leasing commission fees and other services, and payroll and related costs reimbursed from clients. Fee income derived from the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures (which are capitalized by such ventures) are recognized to the extent attributable to the unaffiliated ownership interests. | |
Parking income includes income from parking spaces leased to tenants and others. | |
Other income includes income from tenants for additional services arranged for by the Company and income from tenants for early lease terminations. | |
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts | Management performs a detailed review of amounts due from tenants to determine if an allowance for doubtful accounts is required based on factors affecting the collectability of the accounts receivable balances. The factors considered by management in determining which individual tenant receivable balances, or aggregate receivable balances, require a collectability allowance include the age of the receivable, the tenant’s payment history, the nature of the charges, any communications regarding the charges and other related information. Management’s estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts requires management to exercise significant judgment about the timing, frequency and severity of collection losses, which affects the allowance and net income. |
Income and Other Taxes | The |
The | |
As of December 31, 2018, the estimated net basis of the rental property for federal income tax purposes was lower than the net assets as reported in the Operating Partnership’s financial statements by approximately $410,573,000. The Operating Partnership’s taxable income for the year ended December 31, 2018 was estimated to be approximately $82,106,000 and for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was approximately $97,037,000 and $30,208,000, respectively. The differences between book income and taxable income primarily result from differences in depreciation expenses, the recording of rental income, differences in the deductibility of interest expense and certain other expenses for tax purposes, differences in revenue recognition and the rules for tax purposes of a property exchange. | |
The General Partner has elected to treat certain of its corporate subsidiaries as taxable REIT subsidiaries (each a “TRS”). In general, a TRS of the |
The deferred tax asset balance at December 31, 2018 amounted to $10.1 million which has been fully reserved through a valuation allowance. New tax reform legislation enacted in late 2017 reduced the corporate tax rate to 21 percent, effective January 1, 2018. Consequently, the Company’s deferred tax assets were re-measured to reflect the reduction in the future U.S. corporate income tax rate as of the enactment date. As a result, the Company recorded a decrease related to its deferred tax assets of $5.3 million and a decrease to the associated valuation allowance of $5.3 million at December 31, 2017. If the General Partner fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, the Company will be subject to federal income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate tax rates. The Company is subject to certain state and local taxes. |
Pursuant to the amended provisions related to uncertain tax provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes, the Company recognized no material adjustments regarding its tax accounting treatment. The Company expects to recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions, if any, as income tax expense, which is included in general and administrative expense. | |
In the normal course of business, the Company or one of its subsidiaries is subject to examination by federal, state and local jurisdictions in which it operates, where applicable. As of December 31, 2018, the tax years that remain subject to examination by the major tax jurisdictions under the statute of limitations are generally from the year 2014 forward. | |
Earnings Per Share or Unit | The Company presents both basic and diluted earnings per share or unit (“ |
Dividends and Distributions Payable |
The dividends and distributions payable at December 31, | |
The dividends and distributions payable at December 31, 2017 represents dividends payable to common shareholders (89,914,658 shares) and distributions payable to noncontrolling interest unitholders of the Operating Partnership (10,438,855 common units and 1,230,877 LTIP units) for all such holders of record as of January 3, 2018 with respect to the fourth quarter 2017. The fourth quarter 2017 common stock dividends and unit distributions of $0.20 per common share, common unit and LTIP unit were approved by the General Partner’s Board of Directors on December 12, 2017 and paid on January 12, 2018. | |
The Company has determined that the $0.80 dividend per common share paid during the year ended December 31, 2018 represented approximately 47 percent ordinary income and approximately 53 percent capital gain; the $0.70 dividend per common share paid during the year ended December 31, 2017 represented 100 percent ordinary income and the $0.60 dividend per common share paid during the year ended December 31, 2016 represented 100 percent return of capital. |
Costs incurred in connection with the Company’s stock issuances are reflected as a reduction of additional paid-in capital. |
Stock Compensation | The Company accounts for stock compensation in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation. These provisions require that the estimated fair value of restricted stock (“Restricted Stock Awards”), |
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Other comprehensive income (loss) | |
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests | The Company evaluates the terms of the partnership units issued in |
Fair Value Hierarchy |
The standard Fair Value Measurements specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based upon whether the inputs to those valuation techniques reflect assumptions other market participants would use based upon market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs). The following summarizes the fair value hierarchy: |
·Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets that are unadjusted and accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities; |
·Level 2: Quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in markets that are inactive, quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or financial instruments for which significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals and |
·Level 3: Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable. |
In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
Impact Of Recently-Issued Accounting Standards | In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), modifying the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of |
recorded on the balance sheet. For lessors, however, the accounting remains largely equivalent to the current model, with the distinction between operating, sales-type, and direct financing leases retained, but updated to align with certain changes to the lessee model and the new revenue recognition standard. | |
ASU 2016-02 provides two transition methods. The first transition method allows for application of | |
Under ASU 2016-02, lessors will only capitalize incremental direct leasing costs and will expense internal leasing costs that were previously capitalized prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-02. For leases where the Company is a lessee, primarily its ground leases, the Company expects to recognize a right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease liability. The Company is continuing to assess the potential impact of this standard but expects to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for |
In | |
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging: Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities (“ASU 2017-12”). The purpose of |
3. RECENT TRANSACTIONS
Management Changes
In June 2014,March 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2014-12 Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718) - Accounting for Share-Based Payments WhenCompany announced the Termsappointment of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period (“ASU 2014-12”). The amendments in ASU 2014-12 apply to all reporting entities that grant their employees share-based payments in which the termsMichael J. DeMarco, Chief Executive Officer of the award provideGeneral Partner, to its Board of Directors effective March 14, 2018. Mr. DeMarco’s addition to the Board expanded the total number of members from nine to ten. In February 2019, the Company announced that the Board of Directors increased its size from ten to eleven members, effective immediately, and nominated a performance target that affects vesting could be achieved afterslate of eleven candidates consisting of Lisa Myers, Laura Pomerantz and all of the requisite service period. Thatcurrent directors of the Company (other than Kenneth M. Duberstein, who decided not to stand for re-election and will retire from the Board of Directors at the Company’s 2019 annual meeting of shareholders) for election to the Board of Directors at the Company’s 2019 annual meeting of shareholders, which is the employee would be eligible to vest in the award regardless of whether the employee is rendering service on the date the performance target is achieved. Current GAAP does not contain explicit guidance on how to account for those share-based payments. ASU 2014-12 is intended to resolve the accounting treatment of such awards. The amendments in ASU 2014-12 are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015 with early adoption permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014-12 is not expected to impactbe held on June 12, 2019.
In January 2018, the Company announced the appointment of David J. Smetana as chief financial officer and Nicholas Hilton as executive vice president of leasing of the General Partner. Mr. Smetana began to perform his duties as chief financial officer and Anthony Krug ceased to serve as chief financial officer immediately following the filing of the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In June 2018, the Company announced that the employment of Mitchell E. Rudin as Vice Chairman of the General Partner was terminated effective as of June 5, 2018. In November 2018, the Company announced that the employment of Robert Andrew Marshall
as President and Executive Vice President of Development of RRT was terminated effective as of October 31, 2018. In addition, the Company also restructured certain other corporate and property management personnel during the year ended December 31, 2018.
As a result of the executive management changes as well as other personnel changes during the period, the Company incurred total net severance and related expenses in the year ended December 31, 2018 of $7.9 million, $6.5 million of which was included in general and administrative expense (including $1.0 million of stock compensation expense due to accelerated vesting and a net reversal of $2.0 million of amortization of stock compensation expense due to the forfeiture of unvested securities) and $1.4 million of which was included in operating services expense for annual periodsthe period.
Acquisitions
On February 6, 2019, the Company completed the acquisition of a 271,988 square foot office property located in Iselin, New Jersey, for a purchase price of $61.5 million, which was funded using funds available with the Company’s qualified intermediary and interim periods thereafter with early adoption permitted.borrowings under the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility.
On January 25, 2019, the Company signed an agreement to acquire a 377-unit multi-family rental property located in Jersey City, New Jersey for approximately $264 million, subject to certain conditions. The adoption of ASU 2014-15acquisition is not expected to materially impactbe completed in the second quarter 2019.
2017
The Company acquired the following office properties (which were determined to be asset acquisitions in accordance with ASU 2017-01) during the year ended December 31, 2017 (dollars in thousands):
Acquisition |
|
|
|
|
| # of |
| Rentable |
| Acquisition |
| |
Date |
| Property Address |
| Location |
| Bldgs. |
| Square Feet |
| Cost |
| |
01/11/17 |
| Red Bank portfolio (a) |
| Red Bank, New Jersey |
| 3 |
| 279,472 |
| $ | 27,228 |
|
03/06/17 |
| Short Hills/Madison portfolio (b) |
| Short Hills & Madison, New Jersey |
| 6 |
| 1,113,028 |
| 367,361 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
| 1,392,500 |
| $ | 394,589 |
|
(a) This acquisition was funded through borrowings under the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
(b) This acquisition was funded through borrowings under the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, Consolidation–Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis (Topic 810) (“ASU 2015-02”). ASU 2015-02 updates guidance related to accounting for consolidation of certain limited partnerships. ASU 2015-02 does not add or remove any of the five characteristics that determine if an entity isCompany’s unsecured revolving credit facility and a VIE; however, it changes the manner in which a reporting entity assesses its ability to make decisions about the entity's activities. Additionally, ASU 2015-02 removesnew $124.5 million loan secured by three of the six criteria that must be metproperties.
The purchase prices were allocated to the net assets acquired, as follows (in thousands):
|
| Red Bank |
| Short Hills/Madison |
|
|
| |||
|
| Portfolio |
| Portfolio |
| Total |
| |||
Land and leasehold interest |
| $ | 7,914 |
| $ | 30,336 |
| $ | 38,250 |
|
Buildings and improvements and other assets |
| 16,047 |
| 295,299 |
| 311,346 |
| |||
Above market leases (a) |
| 118 |
| 6,367 |
| 6,485 |
| |||
In-place lease values (a) |
| 3,171 |
| 45,604 |
| 48,775 |
| |||
|
| 27,250 |
| 377,606 |
| 404,856 |
| |||
Less: Below market lease values (a) |
| (22 | ) | (10,245 | ) | (10,267 | ) | |||
Net assets recorded upon acquisition |
| $ | 27,228 |
| $ | 367,361 |
| $ | 394,589 |
|
(a) Above market, in-place and below market leases are being amortized over a weighted-average term of 5.4 years.
The Company acquired three separate developable land parcels located in Jersey City, Morris Township and Red Bank, New Jersey, for a fee arrangement to not be a VIEapproximately $80 million during the year ended December 31, 2017. The acquisitions were funded using available cash and modifies how an entity assesses interests held through related parties. ASU 2015-02 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of ASU 2015-02 is not expected to impactborrowings under the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In April 2015,Properties Commencing Initial Operations
The following properties commenced initial operations during the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Interest–Imputation of Interest-Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs (Subtopic 835-30) (“ASU 2015-03”). ASU 2015-03 requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presentedyear ended December 31, 2018 (dollars in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying value of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by this update. Debt issuance costs related to revolving lines of credit are not within the scope of this new guidance. Additionally, in August 2015 the FASB issued guidance expanding the April 2015 update (ASU 2015-15). It states that, given the absence of authoritative guidance within the update, the SEC staff would not object to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuancethousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| # of |
| Total |
| |
In-Service |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Apartment Units/ |
| Development |
| |
Date |
| Property |
| Location |
| Type |
| Rooms |
| Costs Incurred |
| |
03/01/18 |
| 145 Front at City Square |
| Worcester, MA |
| Multi-Family |
| 365 |
| $ | 97,483 | (a) |
04/01/18 |
| Signature Place at Morris Plains |
| Morris Plains, NJ |
| Multi-Family |
| 197 |
| 56,715 | (b) | |
05/01/18 |
| Portside 5/6 |
| East Boston, MA |
| Multi-Family |
| 296 |
| 114,694 | (c) | |
08/01/18 |
| RiverHouse 11 at Port Imperial |
| Weehawken, NJ |
| Multi-Family |
| 295 |
| 130,369 | (d) | |
12/13/18 |
| Residence Inn By Marriott (Phase I) |
| Weehawken, NJ |
| Hotel |
| 164 |
| 58,723 | (e) | |
Totals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1,317 |
| $ | 457,984 |
|
(a) Development costs as an asset for revolving lines of credit and subsequently amortizingDecember 31, 2018 included approximately $4.4 in land costs. As of December 31, 2018, the deferred debt issuanceCompany anticipates additional costs ratably overof approximately $1.1 million, which will be primarily funded from a construction loan.
(b) Development costs as of December 31, 2018 included approximately $0.9 in land costs.
(c) As of December 31, 2018, the termCompany anticipates additional costs of approximately $0.7 million, which will be funded by the arrangement, regardlessCompany.
(d) As of whether there are any outstanding borrowings onDecember 31, 2018, the lineCompany anticipates additional costs of credit. This guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after$1.2 million which will be funded by the Company.
(e) As of December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued. Full retrospective application is required. The adoption31, 2018, the Company anticipates additional costs of ASU 2015-03$20.1 million which will result in debt issuance costs, currently included in Deferred charges, goodwill and other assets, being presented in the balance sheet asbe funded from a direct deduction from the carrying value of the related debt liabilitiesconstruction loan.
.Consolidations
2018
On January 5, 2016,August 2, 2018, the Company, which held a 5024.27 percent subordinated interest in the property-owning entity, Overlook Ridge Apartment Investorsunconsolidated joint venture Marbella Tower Urban Renewal Associates LLC, acquired its remaining interest in a 371-unit412-unit multi-family operating property located in Malden, Massachusetts for $39.8 million.
| Parsippany | Edison | ||||
| Land | $ | 5,590 | $ | 5,542 | |
| Buildings and improvements | 4,710 | 40,762 | |||
| Above market leases (1) | - | 2,097 | |||
| In-place lease values (1) | - | 4,699 | |||
| Net cash paid at acquisition | $ | 10,300 | $ | 53,100 |
The purchase price was allocated to the netNet assets acquired,recorded upon consolidation were as follows during the year ended December 31, 2014 (in thousands):
Land and leasehold interest |
| $ | 48,820 |
|
Buildings and improvements and other assets, net |
| 162,958 |
| |
In-place lease values (a) |
| 6,947 |
| |
Less: Below market lease values (a) |
| (108 | ) | |
|
| 218,617 |
| |
Less: Debt |
| (131,000 | ) | |
Net Assets |
| 87,617 |
| |
Less: Noncontrolling interest (b) |
| (22,812 | ) | |
Net assets recorded upon consolidation |
| $ | 64,805 |
|
(a) In-place | |||
(b) Noncontrolling interest balance reflects distribution of $7.0 million of acquisition and other investment fundings (of which $40.1 million relatedloan proceeds at closing.
2017
On February 3, 2017, the Operating Partnership issued 42,800 shares of a new class of 3.5 percent Series A Preferred Limited Partnership Units of the Operating Partnership (the “Series A Units”) valued at $42.8 million. The Series A Units were issued to the acquisitionCompany’s partners in the Plaza VIII & IX Associates L.L.C. joint venture that owns a development site adjacent to the Company’s Harborside property in Jersey City, New Jersey as non-cash consideration for their approximate 37.5 percent interest in the joint venture. Concurrent with the issuance of 50the Series A Units, the Company purchased from other partners in the Plaza VIII & IX Associates L.L.C. joint venture their approximate 12.5 percent tenantsinterest for approximately $14.3 million in commoncash. The results of these transactions increased the Company’s interests in the Curtis Center property. See Unconsolidated Joint Venture Transactionsjoint venture from 50 percent to 100 percent. Upon these acquisitions, the Company consolidated Plaza VIII & IX Associates L.L.C., a voting interest entity, substantially all of which is comprised of land for development. As an acquisition of the additional 50 percent of the land, the Company accounted for the transaction as an asset acquisition under a cost accumulation model, resulting in Note 4: Investmentstotal consolidated assets of $60.6 million, substantially all of which is classified as land on the Balance Sheet.
On February 28, 2017, the Operating Partnership authorized the issuance of 9,213 shares of a new class of 3.5 percent Series A-1 Preferred Limited Partnership Units of the Operating Partnership (the “Series A-1 Units”). 9,122 Series A-1 Units were issued on February 28, 2017, valued at $9.1 million, to the Company’s partner in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures)a joint venture with the Operating Partnership, which owns Monaco Towers in Jersey City, New Jersey that includes 523 apartment homes in two fifty-story towers with 558 parking spaces and 12,300 square feet of ground floor retail space. The Series A-1 Units were issued as non-cash consideration for the partner’s approximate 13.8 percent ownership interest in the joint venture to increase the Company’s unconsolidated investment to 29 percent. In April 2017, an additional 91 Series A-1 Units were issued by the Operating Partnership to purchase from other partners in the same joint venture
their approximate 71.2 percent ownership interest for approximately $130.9 million in cash and $171.2 million in assumed debt in transactions which closed in April 2017. The results of these transactions increased the Company’s interests in the joint venture to 100 percent. Upon these acquisitions, the Company consolidated RoseGarden Monaco Holdings, L.L.C., a voting interest entity.
As an acquisition of the remaining interests in the venture which were handled throughowns the Monaco Towers, the Company accounted for the transaction as an asset acquisition under a qualified intermediary using proceeds from prior sales structuredcost accumulation model, resulting in total consolidated net assets of $139.9 million which is allocated, as follows (in thousands):
|
| Monaco |
| Monaco |
|
|
| |||
|
| North |
| South |
| Total |
| |||
Land and leasehold interest |
| $ | 27,300 |
| $ | 31,461 |
| $ | 58,761 |
|
Buildings and improvements and other assets |
| 112,841 |
| 129,895 |
| 242,736 |
| |||
Above market leases (a) |
| 350 |
| — |
| 350 |
| |||
In-place lease values (a) |
| 4,585 |
| 4,913 |
| 9,498 |
| |||
Less: Below market lease values (a) |
| (141 | ) | (118 | ) | (259 | ) | |||
|
| 144,935 |
| 166,151 |
| 311,086 |
| |||
Less: Debt assumed at fair value |
| (79,544 | ) | (91,656 | ) | (171,200 | ) | |||
Net assets recorded upon consolidation |
| $ | 65,391 |
| $ | 74,495 |
| $ | 139,886 |
|
(a) Above market, in-place and below market leases are being amortized over a weighted-average term of 8 months.
Dispositions/Rental Property Held for tax purposes as Section 1031 transactions.
2018
The Company disposed of the following office properties during the year ended December 31, 2015 2018 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Realized |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Gains |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Rentable |
| Net |
| Net |
| (losses)/ |
| |||
Disposition |
|
|
|
|
| # of |
| Square |
| Sales |
| Carrying |
| Unrealized |
| |||
Date |
| Property/Address |
| Location |
| Bldgs. |
| Feet |
| Proceeds |
| Value |
| Losses, net |
| |||
02/15/18 |
| 35 Waterview Boulevard (a) |
| Parsippany, New Jersey |
| 1 |
| 172,498 |
| $ | 25,994 |
| $ | 25,739 |
| $ | 255 |
|
03/05/18 |
| Hamilton portfolio (b) |
| Hamilton, New Jersey |
| 6 |
| 239,262 |
| 17,546 |
| 17,501 |
| 45 |
| |||
03/07/18 |
| Wall portfolio first closing |
| Wall, New Jersey |
| 5 |
| 179,601 |
| 14,053 |
| 10,526 |
| 3,527 |
| |||
03/22/18 |
| 700 Horizon Drive |
| Hamilton, New Jersey |
| 1 |
| 120,000 |
| 33,020 |
| 16,053 |
| 16,967 |
| |||
03/23/18 |
| Wall portfolio second closing |
| Wall, New Jersey |
| 3 |
| 217,822 |
| 30,209 |
| 12,961 |
| 17,248 |
| |||
03/28/18 |
| 75 Livingston Avenue |
| Roseland, New Jersey |
| 1 |
| 94,221 |
| 7,983 |
| 5,609 |
| 2,374 |
| |||
03/28/18 |
| 20 Waterview Boulevard (c) |
| Parsippany, New Jersey |
| 1 |
| 225,550 |
| 12,475 |
| 11,795 |
| 680 |
| |||
03/30/18 |
| Westchester Financial Center (d) |
| White Plains, New York |
| 2 |
| 489,000 |
| 81,769 |
| 64,679 |
| 17,090 |
| |||
06/27/18 |
| 65 Jackson Drive |
| Cranford, New Jersey |
| 0 |
| — |
| 1,510 | (e) | — |
| 1,510 |
| |||
08/02/18 |
| 600 Horizon Drive |
| Hamilton, New Jersey |
| 1 |
| 95,000 |
| 15,127 |
| 6,191 |
| 8,936 |
| |||
09/05/18 |
| 1 & 3 Barker Avenue |
| White Plains, New York |
| 2 |
| 133,300 |
| 15,140 |
| 13,543 |
| 1,597 |
| |||
11/15/18 |
| 120 Passaic Street (f) |
| Rochelle Park, New Jersey |
| 1 |
| 52,000 |
| 2,667 |
| 2,568 |
| 99 |
| |||
12/31/18 |
| Elmsford Distribution Center |
| Elmsford, New York |
| 6 |
| 387,400 |
| 66,557 |
| 17,314 |
| 49,243 |
| |||
Sub-total |
|
|
|
|
| 30 |
| 2,405,654 |
| 324,050 |
| 204,479 |
| 119,571 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Unrealized losses on rental property held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (20,135 | ) | |||
Totals |
|
|
|
|
| 30 |
| 2,405,654 |
| $ | 324,050 |
| $ | 204,479 |
| $ | 99,436 |
|
| Rentable | Net | Net | ||||||||||||
| Disposition | # of | Square | Sales | Book | Realized | |||||||||
| Date | Property/Address | Location | Bldgs. | Feet | Proceeds | Value | Gain | |||||||
| 01/15/15 | 1451 Metropolitan Drive | West Deptford, New Jersey | 1 | 21,600 | $ | 1,072 | $ | 929 | $ | 143 | ||||
| 05/27/15 | 10 Independence Blvd | Warren, New Jersey | 1 | 120,528 | 18,351 | (a) | 15,114 | 3,237 | ||||||
| 06/11/15 | 4 Sylvan Way | Parsippany, New Jersey | 1 | 105,135 | 15,961 | (a) | 9,522 | 6,439 | ||||||
| 06/26/15 | 14 Sylvan Way | Parsippany, New Jersey | 1 | 203,506 | 79,977 | 55,253 | 24,724 | |||||||
| 07/21/15 | 210 Clay Ave | Lyndhurst, New Jersey | 1 | 121,203 | 14,766 | (a) | 5,202 | 9,564 | ||||||
| 08/24/15 | 5 Becker Farm Rd | Roseland, New Jersey | 1 | 118,343 | 18,129 | (a) | 8,975 | 9,154 | ||||||
| Totals | 6 | 690,315 | $ | 148,256 | $ | 94,995 | $ | 53,261 | ||||||
| (a) The Company transferred the deeds for these properties to the lender in satisfaction of its mortgage loan obligations totaling $59.7 million. The Company recorded an impairment charge of $25.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2013 as it estimated that the carrying value of the properties may not be recoverable over their anticipated holding periods. | ||||||||||||||
(a) The Company recorded a valuation allowance of $0.7 million on this property during the year ended December 31, 2017.
(b) The Company recorded a valuation allowance of $0.6 million on these properties during the year ended December 31, 2017. The disposition additionally included two land properties.
(c) The Company recorded a valuation allowance of $11 million on this property during the year ended December 31, 2017. Prior to closing, the Company provided short term financing through a note receivable to an affiliate of the buyers of $2.8 million. The note was paid off in the second quarter of 2018.
(d) Prior to closing, the Company provided financing through a note receivable to an affiliate of the buyers of $4.0 million. The note was paid off in October 2018.
(e) Represents the receipt by the Company in the second quarter 2018 of variable contingent sales consideration, net of costs, of $1.5 million subsequent to disposition of the property sold in January 2017.
(f) The net sale proceeds were held by a qualified intermediary, which is noncash and recorded in deferred charges, goodwill and other assets as of December 31, 2018. See Note 5: Deferred Charges, Goodwill and Other Assets, Net).
The Company solddisposed of the following developable land holding during the year ended December 31, 2018 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
| Net |
| Net |
| Gain on |
| |||
Disposition |
|
|
|
|
| Sales |
| Carrying |
| Disposition of |
| |||
Date |
| Property Address |
| Location |
| Proceeds |
| Value |
| Developable Land |
| |||
12/31/18 |
| One Lake Street |
| Upper Saddle River, New Jersey (a) |
| $ | 46,036 |
| $ | 15,097 |
| $ | 30,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Totals |
|
|
|
|
| $ | 46,036 |
| $ | 15,097 |
| $ | 30,939 |
|
(a) The net sale proceeds were held by a qualified intermediary, which is noncash and recorded in deferred charges, goodwill and other assets as of December 31, 2018. See Note 5: Deferred Charges, Goodwill and Other Assets, Net. The net carrying value includes $3 million of development costs funded at the closing.
The Company identified as held for sale six office properties, totaling approximately 845,000 square feet, and a 159 unit multi-family rental property as of December 31, 2018. The properties are located in Fort Lee, Newark, Paramus, Bridgewater, Morris Plains and Rahway, New Jersey. The total estimated sales proceeds, net of expected selling costs, from the sales are expected to be approximately $124 million. The Company determined that the carrying value of four of the properties was not expected to be recovered from estimated net sales proceeds and accordingly recognized an unrealized loss allowance of $20.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. In January 2019, the Company completed the disposition of three of these properties for sales proceeds of approximately $54.5 million.
The following table summarizes the rental property held for sale, net, as of December 31, 2018 (dollars in thousands):
|
| December 31, |
| |
|
| 2018 |
| |
Land |
| $ | 24,376 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
| 159,857 |
| |
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
| (55,250 | ) | |
Less: Unrealized losses on properties held for sale |
| (20,135 | ) | |
Rental property held for sale, net |
| $ | 108,848 |
|
Other assets and liabilities related to the rental properties held for sale, as of December 31, 2018, include $2.9 million in Deferred charges and other assets, $1.7 million in Unbilled rents receivable and $2.3 million in Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities. Approximately $3.9 million of these assets and $1.7 million of these liabilities are expected to be removed with the completion of the sales.
2017
The Company disposed of the following office properties during the year ended December 31, 2014 2017 (dollars in thousands):
| Rentable | Net | Net | ||||||||||||
| Sale | # of | Square | Sales | Book | Realized | |||||||||
| Date | Property/Address | Location | Bldgs. | Feet | Proceeds | Value | Gain | |||||||
| 04/23/14 | 22 Sylvan Way | Parsippany, New Jersey | 1 | 249,409 | $ | 94,897 | $ | 60,244 | $ | 34,653 | ||||
| 06/23/14 | 30 Knightsbridge Road (a) | Piscataway, New Jersey | 4 | 680,350 | 54,641 | 52,361 | 2,280 | |||||||
| 06/23/14 | 470 Chestnut Ridge Road (a) (b) | Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey | 1 | 52,500 | 7,195 | 7,109 | 86 | |||||||
| 06/23/14 | 530 Chestnut Ridge Road (a) (b) | Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey | 1 | 57,204 | 6,299 | 6,235 | 64 | |||||||
| 06/27/14 | 400 Rella Boulevard | Suffern, New York | 1 | 180,000 | 27,539 | 10,938 | 16,601 | |||||||
| 06/30/14 | 412 Mount Kemble Avenue (a) | Morris Township, New Jersey | 1 | 475,100 | 44,751 | 43,851 | 900 | |||||||
| 07/29/14 | 17-17 Route 208 North (a) (b) | Fair Lawn, New Jersey | 1 | 143,000 | 11,835 | 11,731 | 104 | |||||||
| 08/20/14 | 555, 565, 570 Taxter Road (a) | Elmsford, New York | 3 | 416,108 | 41,057 | 41,057 | - | |||||||
| 08/20/14 | 200, 220 White Plains Road (a) | Tarrytown, New York | 2 | 178,000 | 12,619 | 12,619 | - | |||||||
| 08/20/14 | 1266 East Main Street (a) (b) | Stamford, Connecticut | 1 | 179,260 | 18,406 | 18,246 | 160 | |||||||
| Totals | 16 | 2,610,931 | $ | 319,239 | $ | 264,391 | $ | 54,848 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Realized |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Gains |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Rentable |
| Net |
|
| Net |
| (losses)/ |
| |||
Disposition |
|
|
|
|
| # of |
| Square |
| Sales |
|
| Carrying |
| Unrealized |
| |||
Date |
| Property/Address |
| Location |
| Bldgs. |
| Feet |
| Proceeds |
|
| Value |
| Losses, net |
| |||
01/30/17 |
| Cranford portfolio |
| Cranford, New Jersey |
| 6 |
| 435,976 |
| $ | 26,598 |
|
| $ | 22,736 |
| $ | 3,862 |
|
01/31/17 |
| 440 Route 22 East (a) |
| Bridgewater, New Jersey |
| 1 |
| 198,376 |
| 10,074 |
|
| 10,069 |
| 5 |
| |||
02/07/17 |
| 3 Independence Way |
| Princeton, New Jersey |
| 1 |
| 111,300 |
| 11,549 |
|
| 9,910 |
| 1,639 |
| |||
05/15/17 |
| 103 Carnegie Center |
| Princeton, New Jersey |
| 1 |
| 96,000 |
| 15,063 |
|
| 8,271 |
| 6,792 |
| |||
08/29/17 |
| 400 Chestnut Ridge Road |
| Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey |
| 1 |
| 89,200 |
| 6,891 |
|
| 7,498 |
| (607 | ) | |||
08/30/17 |
| 140 E. Ridgewood Avenue |
| Paramus, New Jersey |
| 1 |
| 239,680 |
| 30,201 |
|
| 30,737 |
| (536 | ) | |||
08/30/17 |
| Bergen portfolio |
| Woodcliff Lake, Paramus and Rochelle Park, New Jersey |
| 5 |
| 1,061,544 |
| 86,973 | (c) |
| 135,121 |
| (48,148 | ) | |||
09/11/17 |
| 377 Summerhill Road |
| East Brunswick, New Jersey |
| 1 |
| 40,000 |
| 3,221 |
|
| 2,172 |
| 1,049 |
| |||
09/13/17 |
| 700 Executive Boulevard |
| Elmsford, New York |
| — |
| — | (b) | 5,717 |
|
| 970 |
| 4,747 |
| |||
09/20/17 |
| Totowa Portfolio |
| Totowa, New Jersey |
| 13 |
| 499,243 |
| 63,624 |
|
| 27,630 |
| 35,994 |
| |||
09/27/17 |
| 890 Mountain Avenue (d) |
| New Providence, New Jersey |
| 1 |
| 80,000 |
| 4,852 |
|
| 6,139 |
| (1,287 | ) | |||
09/28/17 |
| 135 Chestnut Ridge Road |
| Montvale, New Jersey |
| 1 |
| 66,150 |
| 5,844 | (e) |
| 2,929 |
| 2,915 |
| |||
09/29/17 |
| Moorestown portfolio |
| Moorestown and Burlington, New Jersey |
| 26 |
| 1,260,398 |
| 73,393 | (f) |
| 56,186 |
| 17,207 |
| |||
10/19/17 |
| 1 Enterprise Boulevard |
| Yonkers, New York |
| — |
| — | (b) | 3,230 |
|
| 1,380 |
| 1,850 |
| |||
11/15/17 |
| 61 South Paramus Road |
| Paramus, New Jersey |
| 1 |
| 269,191 |
| 23,255 |
|
| 37,184 |
| (13,929 | ) | |||
12/06/17 |
| 300 Tice Boulevard |
| Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey |
| 1 |
| 230,000 |
| 28,847 |
|
| 25,705 |
| 3,142 |
| |||
Sub-total |
|
|
|
|
| 60 |
| 4,677,058 |
| 399,332 |
|
| 384,637 |
| 14,695 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Unrealized losses on rental property held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (12,331 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Totals |
|
|
|
|
| 60 |
| 4,677,058 |
| $ | 399,332 |
|
| $ | 384,637 |
| $ | 2,364 |
|
(a) The Company early adopted the new discontinued operations accounting standard and as the properties disposedrecorded a valuation allowance of $7.7 million on this property during the year ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 did not represent2016.
(b) This disposition is of a strategic shift (asground leased land property.
(c) At closing, the Company provided short term seller financing aggregating $65 million through mortgage notes receivable to the buyers. These notes were paid off in November and December 2017.
(d) The Company recorded an impairment charge of $7.0 million on this property during the year ended December 31, 2015.
(e) The Company recorded an impairment charge of $4.2 million on this property during the year ended December 31, 2015. $5.9 million of the sales proceeds from this sale were held by a qualified intermediary, which is noncash and recorded in deferred charges, goodwill and other assets as of December 31, 2017. The Company received these proceeds in March 2018. See Note 5: Deferred Charges, Goodwill and Other Assets, Net.
(f) $15.3 million of the sales proceeds from this sale were held by a qualified intermediary, which is noncash and recorded in deferred charges, goodwill and other assets as of December 31, 2017. The Company received these proceeds in March 2018. See Note 5: Deferred Charges, Goodwill and Other Assets, Net.
The Company identified as held for sale 21 office properties totaling approximately 2 million square feet as of December 31, 2017. The properties are located in Parsippany, Paramus, Rochelle Park, Hamilton and Wall, New Jersey and White Plains, New York. The total estimated sales proceeds from the sales were expected to be approximately $223 million. The Company determined that the carrying value of seven of the office properties was not entirely exiting markets or property types), they have not been reflected as partexpected to be recovered from estimated net sales proceeds and accordingly recognized an unrealized loss allowance of discontinued operations.
The following table summarizes income (loss) from the properties disposedrental property held for sale, net, as of during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013: 2017 (dollars in thousands):
| Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||
| Total revenues | $ | 9,137 | $ | 53,975 | $ | 79,379 | |||
| Operating and other expenses | (5,532) | (24,311) | (34,835) | ||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | (11,700) | (9,955) | (20,927) | ||||||
| Interest expense | (7,008) | (10,369) | (9,784) | ||||||
| Income (loss) from properties disposed of | $ | (15,103) | $ | 9,340 | $ | 13,833 | |||
| Impairments | - | - | (79,378) | ||||||
| Realized gains on dispositions | 53,261 | 54,848 | - | ||||||
| Total income (loss) from properties disposed of | $ | 38,158 | $ | 64,188 | $ | (65,545) | |||
|
| December 31, |
| |
|
| 2017 |
| |
Land |
| $ | 37,024 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
| 273,388 |
| |
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
| (126,503 | ) | |
Less: Unrealized losses on properties held for sale |
| (12,331 | ) | |
Rental property held for sale,net |
| $ | 171,578 |
|
Other assets and Used
Land Impairments
The Company owns two separate developable land parcels in Conshohocken and Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, that were being considered for development into multi-family rental properties. During the fourth quarter 2018, the Company announced a three-year strategic initiativemade the decision to transformpursue selling the Company into a more concentrated owner of New Jersey Hudson River waterfront and transit-oriented office properties and a regional owner of luxury multi-family residential properties. In connection with the transformation of the Company’s portfolio, management began developing a disposition plan in September 2015, which will be an ongoing assessment process. Through this plan, the Company, in the coming years, expectsland parcels as opposed to dispose of primarily office properties considered non-core to its ongoing operations. As a result, at September 30, 2015, the Company evaluated the recoverability of the carrying values of these non-core properties, and determined that duedevelopment. Due to the shortening of the expected periods of ownership, the Company determined that it was necessary to reduce the carrying values of 22 rental properties to their estimated fair values. Accordingly, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $158.6 million at September 30, 2015 reducing the aggregate carrying values of these properties from $554.3 millionland parcels to their estimated fair values (ascertained by broker opinions of $395.7 million. Atvalue obtained during the marketing process) and recorded total land impairments charges of $24.6 million at December 31, 2015,2018.
Rockpoint Transaction
On February 27, 2017, the Company, RRT, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary through which the Company conducts its multi-family residential real estate operations, Roseland Residential, L.P. (“RRLP”), the operating partnership through which RRT conducts all of its operations, and certain other affiliates of the Company entered into an equity investment agreement (the “Investment Agreement”) with Rockpoint Group, L.L.C. and certain of its affiliates (collectively, “Rockpoint”). The Investment Agreement provides for multiple equity investments by Rockpoint in RRLP from time to time for up to an aggregate of $300 million of equity units of limited partnership interests of RRLP (the “Rockpoint Units”). The initial closing under the Investment Agreement occurred on March 10, 2017 for $150 million of Rockpoint Units. Additional closings of Rockpoint Units to be issued and sold to Rockpoint pursuant to the Investment Agreement may occur from time to time in increments of not less than $10 million per closing, with the balance of the full $300 million by March 1, 2019. See Note 14: Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests.
RRLP has been identified as a variable interest entity in which the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary. As of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company’s consolidated RRLP entity had total assets of $2.3 billion and $1.9 billion, respectively, total mortgages and loan payable of $1.1 billion and $769.7 million, respectively, and other liabilities of $57 million and $95.9 million, respectively.
Unconsolidated Joint Venture Activity
On January 31, 2019, the Company, which held a 24.27 percent subordinated interest in the unconsolidated joint venture Marbella Tower Urban Renewal Associates South LLC, a 311-unit multi-family operating property located in Jersey City, New Jersey, acquired its equity partner’s 50 percent interest for $77.5 million in cash. The acquisition was funded primarily using available cash. Concurrently with the closing, the joint venture repaid in full the property’s $74.7 million mortgage loan and obtained a new loan in the amount of $117 million.
On December 11, 2018, the Company acquired one of its partner’s interest in the Metropolitan and Shops at 40 Park and the Lofts at 40 Park for $1.3 million and as a result, ofincreased its periodic evaluation ofownership from 12.5 percent interest to 25 percent interest in the recoverability ofMetropolitan and Shops at 40 Park and from 25 percent interest to 50 percent interest in the carrying values resulting from its ongoing assessment of non-core properties,Lofts at 40 Park.
On September 29, 2017, the Company recordedsold its interests in the KPG-MCG Curtis joint venture that owns an additional impairment chargeoperating property located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania for a sales price of $33.7 million.
On September 21, 2017, the RoseGarden Monaco, L.L.C. joint venture agreement was not repaid at maturity andterminated. Accordingly, the Company is in discussions with the lender regarding potential options in satisfaction of the obligation (see Note 10: Mortgages, Loans Payable and Other Obligations). As of September 30, 2015, the Company estimated thatwrote off the carrying value of threeits investment in the joint venture and recorded a loss of these$1.4 million on the disposition of its joint venture interest.
On February 15, 2017, the Company sold its 7.5 percent interest in the Elmajo Urban Renewal Associates, LLC and Estuary Urban Renewal Unit B, LLC joint ventures that own operating multi-family properties aggregating 479,877 square feet and located in Roseland and Parsippany,Weehawken, New Jersey may not be recoverable over their anticipated holding periods. In order to reducefor a sales price of $5.1 million and realized a gain on the carrying valuessale of the properties to their estimated fair values,unconsolidated joint venture of $5.1 million.
On January 31, 2017, the Company recorded impairment chargessold its interest in the KPG-P 100 IMW JV, LLC, Keystone-Penn and Keystone-Tristate joint ventures that own operating properties, located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania for an aggregate sales price of $5.6$9.7 million at September 30, 2015, which resulted fromand realized a gain on the current decline in leasing activity and market rentssale of the properties identified. The Company had previously recorded impairment charges on these properties at September 30, 2013unconsolidated joint venture of $12.5$7.4 million.
4. INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES
As of December 31, 2015,2018, the Company had an aggregate investment of approximately $303.5$232.8 million in its equity method joint ventures. The Company formed these ventures with unaffiliated third parties, or acquired interests in them, to develop or manage primarily office and multi-family rental properties, or to acquire land in anticipation of possible development of office and multi-family rental properties. As of December 31, 2015,2018, the unconsolidated joint ventures owned: 36four office properties aggregating approximately 5.60.5 million square feet, 13eight multi-family properties totaling 4,343 apartments,2,922 apartment units, two retail properties aggregating approximately 81,700 square feet, a 350-room hotel, a development projectsproject for up to approximately 1,074 apartments;360 apartment units; and interests and/or rights to developable land parcels able to accommodate up to 2,910 apartments and 1.4 million square feet of office space.3,738 apartment units. The Company’s unconsolidated interests range from 7.520 percent to 85 percent subject to specified priority allocations in certain of the joint ventures.
The amounts reflected in the following tables (except for the Company’s share of equity in earnings) are based on the historical financial information of the individual joint ventures. The Company does not record losses of the joint ventures in excess of its investment balances unless the Company is liable for the obligations of the joint venture or is otherwise committed to provide financial support to the joint venture. The outside basis portion of the Company’s investments in joint ventures is amortized over the anticipated useful lives of the underlying ventures’ tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Unless otherwise noted below, the debt of the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures generally is non-recourse to the Company, except for customary exceptions pertaining to such matters as intentional misuse of funds, environmental conditions, and material misrepresentations.
The Company has agreed to guarantee repayment of a portion of the debt of its unconsolidated joint ventures. As of December 31, 2015,2018, such debt had a total facility amount of $547.6$316.9 million of which the Company agreed to guarantee up to $74.7$35.8 million. As of December 31, 2015,2018, the outstanding balance of such debt totaled $309.9$204.9 million of which $53.1$24.6 million was guaranteed by the Company. The Company also posted a $3.6 million letter of credit in support of the South Pier at Harborside joint venture, half of which is indemnified by Hyatt Corporation, the Company’s joint venture partner. The Company performed management, leasing, development and other services for the properties owned by the unconsolidated joint ventures and recognized $5.5$2.4 million and $6.2$2.8 million for such services in the years ended December 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, respectively. The Company had $0.8$0.2 million and $1.0$0.8 million in accounts receivable due from its unconsolidated joint ventures as of December 31, 20152018 and 2014.
Included in the Company’s investments in unconsolidated joint ventures as of December 31, 20152018 are fivefour unconsolidated development joint ventures, which are VIEs for which the Company is not the primary beneficiary. These joint ventures are primarily established to develop real estate property for long-term investment and were deemed VIEs primarily based on the fact that the equity investment at risk was not sufficient to permit the entities to finance their activities without additional financial support. The initial equity contributed to these entities was not sufficient to fully finance the real estate construction as development costs are funded by the partners throughout the construction period. The Company determined that it was not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs based on the fact that the Company has shared control of these entities along with the entity’s partners and therefore does not have controlling financial interests in these VIEs. The Company’s aggregate investment in these VIEs was approximately $173.4$129.5 million as of December 31, 2015.2018. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with these VIEs is estimated to be approximately $207.1$165.4 million, which includes the Company’s current investment and estimated future funding commitments/guarantees of approximately $33.7$35.8 million. The Company has not provided financial support to these VIEs that it was not previously contractually required to provide. In general, future costs of development not financed through third parties will be funded with capital contributions from the Company and its outside partners in accordance with their respective ownership percentages.
The following is a summary of the Company'sCompany’s unconsolidated joint ventures as of December 31, 20152018 and 2014: 2017 (dollars in thousands):
| Property Debt | |||||||||||||||||
| Number of | Company's | Carrying Value | As of December 31, 2015 | ||||||||||||||
| Apartment Units | Effective | December 31, | December 31, | Maturity | Interest | ||||||||||||
| Entity / Property Name | or Square Feet (sf) | Ownership % (a) | 2015 | 2014 | Balance | Date | Rate | ||||||||||
| Multi-family | |||||||||||||||||
| Marbella RoseGarden, L.L.C./ Marbella (b) | 412 | units | 24.27 | % | $ | 15,569 | $ | 15,779 | $ | 95,000 | 05/01/18 | 4.99 | % | ||||
| RoseGarden Monaco Holdings, L.L.C./ Monaco (b) | 523 | units | 15.00 | % | 937 | 2,161 | 165,000 | 02/01/21 | 4.19 | % | |||||||
| Rosewood Lafayette Holdings, L.L.C./ Highlands at Morristown Station (c) | 217 | units | 25.00 | % | - | 62 | - | - | - | ||||||||
| PruRose Port Imperial South 15, LLC /RiversEdge at Port Imperial (b) | 236 | units | 50.00 | % | - | - | 57,500 | 09/01/20 | 4.32 | % | |||||||
| Rosewood Morristown, L.L.C. / Metropolitan at 40 Park (d) (e) | 130 | units | 12.50 | % | 5,723 | 6,029 | 45,982 | (f) | (f) | ||||||||
| Overlook Ridge JV 2C/3B, L.L.C./The Chase at Overlook Ridge (b) | 371 | units | 50.00 | % | 2,039 | 2,524 | 52,662 | 01/26/16 | L+2.50 | % | (g) | ||||||
| PruRose Riverwalk G, L.L.C./ RiverTrace at Port Imperial (b) | 316 | units | 25.00 | % | - | 955 | 79,393 | 07/15/21 | 6.00 | % | (h) | ||||||
| Elmajo Urban Renewal Associates, LLC / Lincoln Harbor (Bldg A&C) (b) | 355 | units | 7.50 | % | - | - | 128,100 | 03/01/30 | 4.00 | % | (i) | ||||||
| Crystal House Apartments Investors LLC / Crystal House (j) | 798 | units | 25.00 | % | 28,114 | 27,051 | 165,000 | 04/01/20 | 3.17 | % | |||||||
| Portside Master Company, L.L.C./ Portside at Pier One - Bldg 7 (b) | 176 | units | 38.25 | % | - | 1,747 | 42,500 | 12/04/17 | L+2.50 | % | (k) | ||||||
| PruRose Port Imperial South 13, LLC / RiverParc at Port Imperial (b) | 280 | units | 20.00 | % | - | 1,087 | 70,386 | 06/27/16 | L+2.15 | % | (l) | ||||||
| Roseland/Port Imperial Partners, L.P./ Riverwalk C (b) (m) | 363 | units | 20.00 | % | 1,678 | 1,800 | - | - | - | ||||||||
| RoseGarden Marbella South, L.L.C./ Marbella II | 311 | units | 24.27 | % | 16,728 | 11,282 | 68,046 | 03/30/17 | L+2.25 | % | (n) | ||||||
| Estuary Urban Renewal Unit B, LLC / Lincoln Harbor (Bldg B) (b) | 227 | units | 7.50 | % | - | - | 81,900 | 03/01/30 | 4.00 | % | (o) | ||||||
| Riverpark at Harrison I, L.L.C./ Riverpark at Harrison (c) | 141 | units | 45.00 | % | 2,544 | 4,744 | 30,000 | 08/01/25 | 3.70 | % | (p) | ||||||
| Capitol Place Mezz LLC / Station Townhouses | 378 | units | 50.00 | % | 46,267 | 49,327 | 100,700 | 07/01/33 | 4.82 | % | (q) | ||||||
| Harborside Unit A Urban Renewal, L.L.C. / URL Harborside | 763 | units | 85.00 | % | 96,799 | 34,954 | 63,871 | 08/01/29 | 5.197 | % | (r) | ||||||
| RoseGarden Monaco, L.L.C./ San Remo Land | 250 | potential units | 41.67 | % | 1,339 | 1,283 | - | - | - | ||||||||
| Grand Jersey Waterfront URA, L.L.C./ Liberty Landing | 850 | potential units | 50.00 | % | 337 | 337 | - | - | - | ||||||||
| Office | |||||||||||||||||
| Red Bank Corporate Plaza, L.L.C./ Red Bank | 92,878 | sf | 50.00 | % | 4,140 | 3,963 | 15,124 | 05/17/16 | L+3.00 | % | (s) | ||||||
| 12 Vreeland Associates, L.L.C./ 12 Vreeland Road | 139,750 | sf | 50.00 | % | 5,890 | 5,620 | 12,543 | 07/01/23 | 2.87 | % | |||||||
| BNES Associates III / Offices at Crystal Lake | 106,345 | sf | 31.25 | % | 2,295 | 1,993 | 6,133 | 11/01/23 | 4.76 | % | |||||||
| Hillsborough 206 Holdings, L.L.C./ Hillsborough 206 | 160,000 | sf | 50.00 | % | 1,962 | 1,962 | - | - | - | ||||||||
| KPG-P 100 IMW JV, LLC / 100 Independence Mall West | 339,615 | sf | 33.33 | % | - | - | 61,500 | 09/09/16 | L+7.00 | % | (t) | ||||||
| Keystone-Penn (c) | 1,842,820 | sf | (u) | - | - | 227,111 | (v) | (v) | |||||||||
| Keystone-TriState | 1,266,384 | sf | (w) | 3,958 | 6,140 | 208,476 | (x) | (x) | |||||||||
| KPG-MCG Curtis JV, L.L.C./ Curtis Center (y) | 885,000 | sf | 50.00 | % | 59,858 | 59,911 | (z) | (z) | (z) | ||||||||
| Other | |||||||||||||||||
| Plaza VIII & IX Associates, L.L.C./ Vacant land (parking operations) | 1,225,000 | sf | 50.00 | % | 4,055 | 4,022 | - | - | - | ||||||||
| Roseland/North Retail, L.L.C./ Riverwalk at Port Imperial (b) | 30,745 | sf | 20.00 | % | 1,758 | 1,828 | - | - | - | ||||||||
| South Pier at Harborside / Hyatt Regency Jersey City on the Hudson | 350 | rooms | 50.00 | % | (aa) | (aa) | 63,741 | (ab) | (ab) | ||||||||
| Stamford SM LLC / Senior Mezzanine Loan (ac) | n/a | n/a | 80.00 | % | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||
| Other (ad) | 1,467 | 907 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
| Totals: | $ | 303,457 | $ | 247,468 | $ | 1,840,668 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Property Debt |
| |||||||
|
| Number of |
| Company’s |
| Carrying Value |
| As of December 31, 2018 |
| |||||||||||
|
| Apartment Units |
| Effective |
| December 31, |
| December 31, |
|
|
| Maturity |
| Interest |
| |||||
Entity / Property Name |
| or Rentable Square Feet (sf) |
| Ownership % (a) |
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| Balance |
| Date |
| Rate |
| |||||
Multi-family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Marbella (b) |
| 412 |
| units |
| 24.27 | % | $ | — |
| $ | 14,544 |
| $ | — |
| — |
| — | % |
Metropolitan at 40 Park (c) (d) |
| 130 |
| units |
| 25.00 | % | 7,679 |
| 6,834 |
| 55,227 |
| (e) |
| (e) |
| |||
RiverTrace at Port Imperial |
| 316 |
| units |
| 22.50 | % | 8,112 |
| 8,864 |
| 82,000 |
| 11/10/26 |
| 3.21 | % | |||
Crystal House (f) |
| 825 |
| units |
| 25.00 | % | 29,570 |
| 30,570 |
| 162,838 |
| 04/01/20 |
| 3.17 | % | |||
PI North - Riverwalk C |
| 360 |
| units |
| 40.00 | % | 27,175 |
| 16,844 |
| — |
| 12/06/21 |
| L+2.75 | %(g) | |||
Marbella II (i) |
| 311 |
| units |
| 24.27 | % | 15,414 |
| 16,471 |
| 74,690 |
| 03/30/19 |
| L+2.25 | %(h) | |||
Riverpark at Harrison |
| 141 |
| units |
| 45.00 | % | 1,272 |
| 1,604 |
| 29,819 |
| 08/01/25 |
| 3.70 | % | |||
Station House |
| 378 |
| units |
| 50.00 | % | 37,675 |
| 40,124 |
| 98,504 |
| 07/01/33 |
| 4.82 | % | |||
Urby at Harborside |
| 762 |
| units |
| 85.00 | % | 85,317 |
| 94,429 |
| 191,732 |
| 08/01/29 |
| 5.197 | %(j) | |||
PI North -Land (k) |
| 836 |
| potential units |
| 20.00 | % | 1,678 |
| 1,678 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |||
Liberty Landing |
| 850 |
| potential units |
| 50.00 | % | 337 |
| 337 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |||
Hillsborough 206 |
| 160,000 |
| sf |
| 50.00 | % | 1,962 |
| 1,962 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Office |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Red Bank |
| 92,878 |
| sf |
| 50.00 | % | 3,127 |
| 4,602 |
| 14,000 |
| 08/01/23 |
| L+2.25 | %(l) | |||
12 Vreeland Road |
| 139,750 |
| sf |
| 50.00 | % | 7,019 |
| 6,734 |
| 7,904 |
| 07/01/23 |
| 2.87 | % | |||
Offices at Crystal Lake |
| 106,345 |
| sf |
| 31.25 | % | 3,442 |
| 3,369 |
| 4,076 |
| 11/01/23 |
| 4.76 | % | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Riverwalk Retail |
| 30,745 |
| sf |
| 20.00 | % | 1,539 |
| 1,625 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |||
Hyatt Regency Jersey City |
| 351 |
| rooms |
| 50.00 | % | 112 |
| 440 |
| 100,000 |
| 10/01/26 |
| 3.668 | % | |||
Other (m) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1,320 |
| 1,595 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |||
Totals: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | 232,750 |
| $ | 252,626 |
| $ | 820,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a)Company’s effective ownership % represents the Company’s entitlement to residual distributions after payments of priority returns, where applicable.
(b)On August 2, 2018, the Company acquired its equity partner’s 50 percent controlling interest in the venture and, as a result, increased its ownership from a 24.27 percent subordinated interest to 74.27 percent controlling interest. See Note 3: Recent Transactions - Consolidation.
(c)The Company’s ownership interests in this venture are subordinate to its partner’s preferred capital balance and the Company is not expected to meaningfully participate in the venture’s cash flows in the near term.
(d)Through the joint venture, the Company also owns a 12.5 percent interest in a 50,973 square feet retail building (“Shops at 40 Park”) and a 25 percent interest in a 59-unit, five story multi-family rental development property (“Lofts at 40 Park”). On December 11, 2018, the Company acquired one of its partner’s interest and as a result, increased its ownership from 12.5 percent interest to 25 percent interest in the Metropolitan and Shops at 40 Park and from 25 percent interest to 50 percent interest in the Lofts at 40 Park.
(e)Property debt balance consists of: (i) an amortizable loan, collateralized by the Metropolitan at 40 Park, with a balance of $36.0 million bears interest at 3.25 percent, matures in September 2020; (ii) an interest only loan, collateralized by the Shops at 40 Park, with a balance of $6.1 million, bears interest at LIBOR+2.25 percent, matures in September 2019; (iii) a loan with a maximum borrowing amount of $13,950 for the Lofts at 40 Park with a balance of $13.1 million, which bears interest at LIBOR plus 250 basis points and matures in February 2020.
(f)Included in this is the Company’s unconsolidated 50 percent interest in a vacant land to accommodate the development of approximately 295 additional units of which 252 are currently approved.
(g)The venture has a construction loan with a maximum borrowing amount of $112,000.
(h)The construction loan which had a maximum borrowing amount of $75,000 was amended on 3/30/18 and, subject to certain conditions, provided for four 3-month extension options with a fee of 6.25 basis points for each extension.
(i)On January 31, 2019, the Company, which held a 24.27 percent subordinated interest in the unconsolidated joint venture, Marbella Tower Urban Renewal Associates South LLC, a 311-unit multi-family operating property located in Jersey City, New Jersey, acquired the majority equity partner’s 50 percent interest in the venture for $77.5 million in cash. The acquisition was funded primarily using available cash. Concurrently with the closing, the joint venture repaid in full the property’s $74.7 million mortgage loan and obtained a new loan in the amount of $117 million.
(j)The construction/permanent loan has a maximum borrowing amount of $192 million. The Company owns an 85 percent interest with shared control over major decisions such as, approval of budgets, property financings and leasing guidelines.
(k)The Company also owns a 20 percent residual interest in undeveloped land parcels: parcels 6, I, and J that can accommodate the development of 836 apartment units.
(l)On August 1, 2018, the venture refinanced its mortgage loan with a maximum borrowing amount of $16,500, bears interest at LIBOR +2.25%, matures on August 1, 2023 and subject to certain conditions, provided for two extension options.
(m)The Company owns other interests in various unconsolidated joint ventures, including interests in assets previously owned and interest in ventures whose businesses are related to its core operations. These ventures are not expected to significantly impact the Company’s operations in the near term.
The following is a summary of the Company’s equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures for the years ended December 31, 20152018, 2017 and 2014:2016 (dollars in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| Entity / Property Name | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||
| Multi-family | ||||||||
| Marbella RoseGarden, L.L.C./ Marbella | $ | 231 | $ | (19) | $ | (540) | ||
| RoseGarden Monaco Holdings, L.L.C./ Monaco | (1,224) | (1,040) | (1,560) | |||||
| Rosewood Lafayette Holdings, L.L.C./ Highlands at Morristown Station | (62) | (853) | (1,131) | |||||
| PruRose Port Imperial South 15, LLC /RiversEdge at Port Imperial | - | - | (606) | |||||
| Rosewood Morristown, L.L.C. / Metropolitan at 40 Park | (364) | (345) | (509) | |||||
| Overlook Ridge JV 2C/3B, L.L.C./The Chase at Overlook Ridge | (371) | (384) | 293 | |||||
| PruRose Riverwalk G, L.L.C./ RiverTrace at Port Imperial | (955) | (2,139) | (985) | |||||
| Elmajo Urban Renewal Associates, LLC / Lincoln Harbor (Bldg A&C) | - | (203) | (345) | |||||
| Crystal House Apartments Investors LLC / Crystal House | (123) | (139) | (2,639) | |||||
| Portside Master Company, L.L.C./ Portside at Pier One - Bldg 7 | (1,736) | (1,163) | (421) | |||||
| PruRose Port Imperial South 13, LLC / RiverParc at Port Imperial | (988) | (863) | (664) | |||||
| Roseland/Port Imperial Partners, L.P./ Riverwalk C | (474) | (646) | (740) | |||||
| RoseGarden Marbella South, L.L.C./ Marbella II | - | - | (57) | |||||
| Estuary Urban Renewal Unit B, LLC / Lincoln Harbor (Bldg B) | 1 | (15) | (157) | |||||
| Riverpark at Harrison I, L.L.C./ Riverpark at Harrison | (363) | (150) | - | |||||
| Capitol Place Mezz LLC / Station Townhouses | (3,687) | (75) | - | |||||
| Harborside Unit A Urban Renewal, L.L.C. / URL Harborside | - | (218) | - | |||||
| RoseGarden Monaco, L.L.C./ San Remo Land | - | - | - | |||||
| Grand Jersey Waterfront URA, L.L.C./ Liberty Landing | (32) | (54) | (77) | |||||
| Office | ||||||||
| Red Bank Corporate Plaza, L.L.C./ Red Bank | 392 | 380 | 372 | |||||
| 12 Vreeland Associates, L.L.C./ 12 Vreeland Road | 270 | 106 | 74 | |||||
| BNES Associates III / Offices at Crystal Lake | 115 | 240 | (14) | |||||
| Hillsborough 206 Holdings, L.L.C./ Hillsborough 206 | (5) | (10) | (35) | |||||
| KPG-P 100 IMW JV, LLC / 100 Independence Mall West | (800) | (1,887) | (913) | |||||
| Keystone-Penn | 3,812 | - | - | |||||
| Keystone-TriState | (2,182) | (318) | - | |||||
| KPG-MCG Curtis JV, L.L.C./ Curtis Center | 475 | 624 | - | |||||
| Other | ||||||||
| Plaza VIII & IX Associates, L.L.C./ Vacant land (parking operations) | 344 | 320 | 99 | |||||
| Roseland/North Retail, L.L.C./ Riverwalk at Port Imperial | (70) | (102) | (230) | |||||
| South Pier at Harborside / Hyatt Regency Jersey City on the Hudson | 3,036 | 2,602 | 2,519 | |||||
| Stamford SM LLC / Senior Mezzanine Loan | - | 2,337 | 3,719 | |||||
| Other | 1,588 | 1,591 | 2,220 | |||||
| Company's equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures | $ | (3,172) | $ | (2,423) | $ | (2,327) | ||
|
| Year Ended December 31, |
| |||||||
Entity / Property Name |
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
| |||
Multi-family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Marbella (b) |
| $ | 205 |
| $ | 334 |
| $ | 231 |
|
Metropolitan at 40 Park |
| (455 | ) | (311 | ) | (317 | ) | |||
RiverTrace at Port Imperial |
| 154 |
| 196 |
| (1,146 | ) | |||
Crystal House |
| (874 | ) | (923 | ) | (870 | ) | |||
PI North - Pier Land |
| (126 | ) | (219 | ) | (62 | ) | |||
PI North - Riverwalk C |
| — |
| (653 | ) | (58 | ) | |||
Marbella II |
| 35 |
| 93 |
| (202 | ) | |||
Riverpark at Harrison |
| (232 | ) | (252 | ) | (190 | ) | |||
Station House |
| (2,096 | ) | (1,793 | ) | (2,440 | ) | |||
Urby at Harborside |
| (975 | )(c) | (6,356 | ) | (219 | ) | |||
Liberty Landing |
| (5 | ) | (15 | ) | (80 | ) | |||
Hillsborough 206 |
| 16 |
| (25 | ) | (53 | ) | |||
Office |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Red Bank |
| (215 | ) | 238 |
| 448 |
| |||
12 Vreeland Road |
| 285 |
| 496 |
| 347 |
| |||
Offices at Crystal Lake |
| 73 |
| 89 |
| (15 | ) | |||
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Roseland/North Retail, L.L.C./ Riverwalk at Port Imperial |
| (86 | ) | (81 | ) | (52 | ) | |||
South Pier at Harborside / Hyatt Regency Jersey City on the Hudson |
| 3,672 |
| 3,277 |
| 24,180 |
| |||
Other |
| 497 |
| (176 | ) | (714 | ) | |||
Company’s equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures (a) |
| $ | (127 | ) | $ | (6,081 | ) | $ | 18,788 |
|
(a) Amounts are net of amortization of basis differences of $903, $792 and $436 for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
(b) On August 2, 2018, the Company acquired one of its equity partner’s 50 percent interest and as a result, increased its ownership from 24.27 percent subordinated interest to 74.27 percent controlling interest, and ceased applying the equity method of accounting at such time.
(c) Includes $2.6 million of the Company’s share of the venture’s income from its first annual sale of an economic tax credit certificate from the State of New Jersey to a third party. The venture has an agreement with a third party to sell it the tax credits over the next nine years for $3 million per year for a total of $27 million. The sales are subject to the venture obtaining the tax credits from the State of New Jersey and transferring the credit certificates each year.
The following is a summary of the combined financial position of the unconsolidated joint ventures in which the Company had investment interests as of December 31, 20152018 and 2014:2017 (dollars in thousands)thousands and unaudited):
| December 31, | December 31, | |||||
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||
| Assets: | ||||||
| Rental property, net | $ | 1,781,621 | $ | 1,534,812 | ||
| Other assets | 307,000 | 398,222 | ||||
| Total assets | $ | 2,088,621 | $ | 1,933,034 | ||
| Liabilities and partners'/ | ||||||
| members' capital: | ||||||
| Mortgages and loans payable | $ | 1,298,293 | $ | 1,060,020 | ||
| Other liabilities | 215,951 | 211,340 | ||||
| Partners'/members' capital | 574,377 | 661,674 | ||||
| Total liabilities and | ||||||
| partners'/members' capital | $ | 2,088,621 | $ | 1,933,034 |
|
| December 31, |
| December 31, |
| ||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| ||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Rental property, net |
| $ | 903,253 |
| $ | 931,419 |
|
Other assets |
| 212,205 |
| 207,903 |
| ||
Total assets |
| $ | 1,115,458 |
| $ | 1,139,322 |
|
Liabilities and partners’/ members’ capital: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Mortgages and loans payable |
| $ | 686,797 |
| $ | 689,412 |
|
Other liabilities |
| 67,072 |
| 80,746 |
| ||
Partners’/members’ capital |
| 361,589 |
| 369,164 |
| ||
Total liabilities and partners’/members’ capital |
| $ | 1,115,458 |
| $ | 1,139,322 |
|
The following is a summary of the combined results from operations of the unconsolidated joint ventures for the period in which the Company had investment interests during the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013: 2016 (dollars in thousands)
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||
| Total revenues | $ | 318,980 | $ | 305,034 | $ | 255,510 | ||
| Operating and other expenses | (220,982) | (233,320) | (217,739) | |||||
| Depreciation and amortization | (71,711) | (42,985) | (32,889) | |||||
| Interest expense | (52,972) | (32,862) | (16,709) | |||||
| Net loss | $ | (26,685) | $ | (4,133) | $ | (11,827) | ||
|
| Year Ended December 31, |
| |||||||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
| |||
Total revenues |
| $ | 310,919 |
| $ | 358,751 |
| $ | 377,711 |
|
Operating and other expenses |
| (230,863 | ) | (297,492 | ) | (262,703 | ) | |||
Depreciation and amortization |
| (40,193 | ) | (31,020 | ) | (75,512 | ) | |||
Interest expense |
| (34,874 | ) | (25,822 | ) | (58,390 | ) | |||
Net income (loss) |
| $ | 4,989 |
| $ | 4,417 |
| $ | (18,894 | ) |
5. DEFERRED CHARGES, GOODWILL AND OTHER ASSETS, NET
|
| December 31, |
| ||||
(dollars in thousands) |
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| ||
Deferred leasing costs |
| $ | 173,822 |
| $ | 199,515 |
|
Deferred financing costs - unsecured revolving credit facility (a) |
| 5,356 |
| 4,945 |
| ||
|
| 179,178 |
| 204,460 |
| ||
Accumulated amortization |
| (71,326 | ) | (98,956 | ) | ||
Deferred charges, net |
| 107,852 |
| 105,504 |
| ||
Notes receivable (b) |
| 47,409 |
| 50,167 |
| ||
In-place lease values, related intangibles and other assets, net (c) (d) |
| 89,860 |
| 102,757 |
| ||
Goodwill (e) |
| 2,945 |
| 2,945 |
| ||
Prepaid expenses and other assets, net (f) |
| 107,168 |
| 80,947 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total deferred charges, goodwill and other assets, net |
| $ | 355,234 |
| $ | 342,320 |
|
(a)
| December 31, | |||||
| (dollars in thousands) | 2015 | 2014 | |||
| Deferred leasing costs | $ | 239,690 | $ | 239,138 | |
| Deferred financing costs | 23,723 | 24,042 | |||
| 263,413 | 263,180 | ||||
| Accumulated amortization | (126,816) | (122,358) | |||
| Deferred charges, net | 136,597 | 140,822 | |||
| Notes receivable (1) | 13,496 | 21,491 | |||
| In-place lease values, related intangibles and other assets, net (2)(3) | 10,931 | 6,565 | |||
| Goodwill | 2,945 | 2,945 | |||
| Prepaid expenses and other assets, net (4) | 49,408 | 32,827 | |||
| Total deferred charges, goodwill and other assets, net | $ | 213,377 | $ | 204,650 | |
(b) |
| Acquired Above- | Acquired Below- | |||||||
| Market Lease | Market Lease | Total | ||||||
| Year | Intangibles | Intangibles | Amortization | |||||
| 2016 | $ | (776) | $ | 345 | $ | (431) | ||
| 2017 | (708) | 339 | (369) | |||||
| 2018 | (645) | 289 | (356) | |||||
| 2019 | (529) | 156 | (373) | |||||
| 2020 | (341) | 21 | (320) |
| Year | |||
| 2016 | $ | 2,399 | |
| 2017 | 2,093 | ||
| 2018 | 1,175 | ||
| 2019 | 979 | ||
| 2020 | - |
(c) In accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations, the Company recognizes rental revenue of acquired above and below market lease intangibles over the terms of the respective leases. The impact of amortizing the acquired above and below-market lease intangibles increased revenue by approximately $5.3 million, $7.9 million and $1.9 million for acquisitionsthe years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and developments.
|
| Acquired Above- |
| Acquired Below- |
|
|
| |||
|
| Market Lease |
| Market Lease |
| Total |
| |||
Year |
| Intangibles |
| Intangibles |
| Amortization |
| |||
2019 |
| $ | (2,559 | ) | $ | 5,050 |
| $ | 2,491 |
|
2020 |
| (2,377 | ) | 4,305 |
| 1,928 |
| |||
2021 |
| (2,245 | ) | 4,186 |
| 1,941 |
| |||
2022 |
| (2,132 | ) | 4,064 |
| 1,932 |
| |||
2023 |
| (1,207 | ) | 3,279 |
| 2,072 |
| |||
(d) The value of acquired in-place lease intangibles are amortized to expense over the remaining initial terms of the respective leases. The impact of the amortization of acquired in-place lease values is included in depreciation and amortization expense and amounted to approximately $17.9 million, $32.2 million and $14.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The following table summarizes, as of December 31, 2018, the scheduled amortization of the Company’s acquired in-place lease values for each of the five succeeding years (dollars in thousands):
Year |
|
|
| |
2019 |
| $ | 10,494 |
|
2020 |
| 8,050 |
| |
2021 |
| 6,884 |
| |
2022 |
| 6,059 |
| |
2023 |
| 4,943 |
| |
(e) All goodwill is attributable to the Company’s Multi-family Real Estate and Services segment.
(f) Includes as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, $49.2 million and $26.9 million, respectively, of proceeds from property sales held by a qualified intermediary.
DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
The Company’s objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, the Company does not have any derivative instrumentsprimarily uses interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. As of December 31, 2018, the Company had outstanding interest rate swaps with a combined notional value of $675 million that were designated as cash flow hedges. The following table summarizeshedges of interest rate risk. During the notional and fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments, designated as fair value hedges, as ofyear ending December 31, 2015 and 2014 (dollars in thousands):
| Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||
| Notional | Strike | Effective | Expiration | December 31, | ||||||||||||
| Value | (a) | Rate | Date | Date | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||
| LIBOR Cap | $ | 51,000 | 1.5 | % | September 2014 | October 2015 | $ | - | $ | 1 | ||||||
| LIBOR Cap | 24,000 | 1.5 | % | September 2014 | October 2015 | - | 1 | |||||||||
| LIBOR Cap | 51,000 | 1.75 | % | October 2015 | October 2016 | 1 | 64 | |||||||||
| LIBOR Cap | 24,000 | 1.75 | % | October 2015 | October 2016 | 1 | 29 | |||||||||
| $ | 2 | $ | 95 | |||||||||||||
The effective portion of |
Undesignated Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate caps not designated as hedges are not speculative and are used to manage the Company’s exposure to interest rate movements but do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements. Changes in the fair value of derivatives not designated in hedging relationships are recorded directly in earnings. The Company recognized expenses of $2,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016, which is included in interest and other investment income (loss) in the consolidated statements of operations.
The table below presents the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on the Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 (dollars in thousands):
|
| Fair Value |
|
|
| ||||
Asset Derivatives designated |
| December 31, |
|
|
| ||||
as hedging instruments |
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| Balance sheet location |
| ||
Interest rate swaps |
| $ | 10,175 |
| $ | 8,060 |
| Deferred charges, goodwill and other assets |
|
The table below presents the effect of the Company’s derivative financial instruments on the Income Statement for the years ending December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 (dollars in thousands):
Derivatives in Cash Flow |
| Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
| Location of Gain or |
| Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
| Location of Gain or |
| Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, |
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
| (Effective Portion) |
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
| Testing) |
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
| |||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
| $ | 5,262 |
| $ | 2,869 |
| $ | (1,183 | ) | Interest expense |
| $ | 2,944 |
| $ | (2,381 | ) | $ | (3,398 | ) | Interest and other investment income (loss) |
| $ | (204 | ) | $ | (37 | ) | $ | 631 |
|
Credit-risk-related Contingent Features
The Company has agreements with each of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision where the Company could be declared in default on its derivative obligations if repayment of the underlying indebtedness is accelerated by the lender due to the Company’s default on the indebtedness. As of December 31, 2018, the Company did not have derivatives in a net liability position including accrued interest but excluding any adjustment for nonperformance risk related to these agreements. As of December 31, 2018, the Company has not posted any collateral related to these agreements.
6. RESTRICTED CASH
Restricted cash generally includes tenant and resident security deposits for certain of the Company’s properties, and escrow and reserve funds for debt service, real estate taxes, property insurance, capital improvements, tenant improvements, and leasing costs established pursuant to certain mortgage financing arrangements, and is comprised of the following: following (dollars in thousands):
| December 31, | |||||
| 2015 | 2014 | ||||
| Security deposits | $ | 7,785 | $ | 7,795 | |
| Escrow and other reserve funds | 27,558 | 26,450 | |||
| Total restricted cash | $ | 35,343 | $ | 34,245 | |
|
| December 31, |
| ||||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| ||
Security deposits |
| $ | 10,257 |
| $ | 9,446 |
|
Escrow and other reserve funds |
| 9,664 |
| 30,346 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total restricted cash |
| $ | 19,921 |
| $ | 39,792 |
|
7. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
A summary of the Company’s senior unsecured notes as of December 31, 20152018 and 20142017 is as follows: follows (dollars in thousands):
|
| December 31, |
| December 31, |
| Effective |
| ||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| Rate (1) |
| ||
4.500% Senior Unsecured Notes, due April 18, 2022 |
| $ | 300,000 |
| $ | 300,000 |
| 4.612 | % |
3.150% Senior Unsecured Notes, due May 15, 2023 |
| 275,000 |
| 275,000 |
| 3.517 |
| ||
Principal balance outstanding |
| 575,000 |
| 575,000 |
|
|
| ||
Adjustment for unamortized debt discount |
| (2,838 | ) | (3,505 | ) |
|
| ||
Unamortized deferred financing costs |
| (1,848 | ) | (2,350 | ) |
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total senior unsecured notes, net |
| $ | 570,314 |
| $ | 569,145 |
|
|
|
(1)
| December 31, | Effective | ||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | Rate (1) | |||||||
| 5.800% Senior Unsecured Notes, due January 15, 2016 (2) | $ | 200,010 | $ | 200,086 | 5.806 | % | |||
| 2.500% Senior Unsecured Notes, due December 15, 2017 | 249,446 | 249,150 | 2.803 | % | |||||
| 7.750% Senior Unsecured Notes, due August 15, 2019 | 249,227 | 249,013 | 8.017 | % | |||||
| 4.500% Senior Unsecured Notes, due April 18, 2022 | 299,624 | 299,565 | 4.612 | % | |||||
| 3.150% Senior Unsecured Notes, due May 15, 2023 | 270,537 | 269,930 | 3.517 | % | |||||
| Total senior unsecured notes | $ | 1,268,844 | $ | 1,267,744 | |||||
The terms of the Company’s senior unsecured notes include certain restrictions and covenants which require compliance with financial ratios relating to the maximum amount of debt leverage, the maximum amount of secured indebtedness, the minimum amount of debt service coverage and the maximum amount of unsecured debt as a percent of unsecured assets. The Company was in compliance with its debt covenants under the indenture relating to its senior unsecured notes as of December 31, 2015.
9. 8. UNSECURED REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITY AND TERM LOANS
On July 16, 2013,January 25, 2017, the Company entered into an amended revolving credit facility and new term loan agreement (“2017 Credit Agreement”) with a group of 13 lenders. Pursuant to the 2017 Credit Agreement, the Company refinanced its existing $600 million unsecured revolving credit facility (“2017 Credit Facility”) and entered into a new $325 million unsecured, delayed draw term loan facility (“2017 Term Loan”). Effective March 6, 2018, the Company elected to determine its interest rate under the 2017 Credit Agreement and under the 2017 Term Loan using the defined leverage ratio option, resulting in an interest rate of LIBOR plus 130 basis points and LIBOR plus 155 basis points, respectively.
The terms of the 2017 Credit Facility include: (1) a four-year term ending in January 2021, with two six-month extension options; (2) revolving credit loans may be made to the Company in an aggregate principal amount of up to $600 million (subject to increase as discussed below), with a sublimit under the 2017 Credit Facility for the issuance of letters of credit in an amount not to exceed $60 million (subject to increase as discussed below); (3) an interest rate, based on the Operating Partnership’s unsecured debt ratings from Moody’s or S&P, or, at the Operating Partnership’s option, if it no longer maintains a debt rating from Moody’s or S&P or such debt ratings fall below Baa3 and BBB-, based on a defined leverage ratio; and (4) a facility fee, currently 25 basis points, payable quarterly based on the Operating Partnership’s unsecured debt ratings from Moody’s or S&P, or, at the Operating Partnership’s option, if it no longer maintains a debt rating from Moody’s or S&P or such debt ratings fall below Baa3 and BBB-, based on a defined leverage ratio.
After electing to use the defined leverage ratio to determine the interest rate, the interest rates on outstanding borrowings, alternate base rate loans and the facility fee on the current borrowing capacity, payable quarterly in arrears, on the 2017 Credit Facility are currently based on the following total leverage ratio grid:
|
|
|
| Interest Rate - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Applicable Basis Points |
|
|
|
|
| Interest Rate - |
| Above LIBOR for |
|
|
|
|
| Applicable Basis |
| Alternate Base Rate |
| Facility Fee |
|
Total Leverage Ratio |
| Points above LIBOR |
| Loans |
| Basis Points |
|
<45% |
| 125.0 |
| 25.0 |
| 20.0 |
|
>45% and <50% (current ratio) |
| 130.0 |
| 30.0 |
| 25.0 |
|
>50% and <55% |
| 135.0 |
| 35.0 |
| 30.0 |
|
>55% |
| 160.0 |
| 60.0 |
| 35.0 |
|
Prior to the election to use the defined leverage ratio option, the interest rates on outstanding borrowings, alternate base rate loans and the facility fee on the current borrowing capacity, payable quarterly in arrears, on the 2017 Credit Facility were based upon the Operating Partnership’s unsecured debt ratings, as follows:
|
|
|
| Interest Rate - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Applicable Basis Points |
|
|
|
Operating Partnership’s |
| Interest Rate - |
| Above LIBOR for |
|
|
|
Unsecured Debt Ratings: |
| Applicable Basis Points |
| Alternate Base Rate |
| Facility Fee |
|
Higher of S&P or Moody’s |
| Above LIBOR |
| Loans |
| Basis Points |
|
No ratings or less than BBB-/Baa3 |
| 155.0 |
| 55.0 |
| 30.0 |
|
BBB- or Baa3 (interest rate based on Company’s election through March 5, 2018) |
| 120.0 |
| 20.0 |
| 25.0 |
|
BBB or Baa2 |
| 100.0 |
| 0.0 |
| 20.0 |
|
BBB+ or Baa1 |
| 90.0 |
| 0.0 |
| 15.0 |
|
A- or A3 or higher |
| 87.5 |
| 0.0 |
| 12.5 |
|
The terms of the 2017 Term Loan include: (1) a three-year term ending in January 2020, with two one-year extension options; (2) multiple draws of the term loan commitments may be made within 12 months of the effective date of the 2017 Credit Agreement up to an aggregate principal amount of $325 million (subject to increase as discussed below), with no requirement to be drawn in full; provided, that, if the Company does not borrow at least 50 percent of the initial term commitment from the term lenders (i.e. 50 percent of $325 million) on or before July 25, 2017, the amount of unused term loan commitments shall be reduced on such date so that, after giving effect to such reduction, the amount of unused term loan commitments is not greater than the outstanding term loans on such date; (3) an interest rate based on the Operating Partnership’s unsecured debt ratings from Moody’s or S&P, or, at the Operating Partnership’s option if it no longer maintains a debt rating from Moody’s or S&P or such debt ratings fall below Baa3 and BBB-, based on a defined leverage ratio; and (4) a term commitment fee on any unused term loan commitment during the first 12 months after the effective date of the 2017 Credit Agreement at a rate of 0.25 percent per annum on the sum of the average daily unused portion of the aggregate term loan commitments.
On March 22, 2017, the Company drew the full $325 million available under the 2017 Term Loan. On March 29, 2017, the Company executed interest rate swap arrangements to fix LIBOR with an aggregate average rate of 1.6473% for the swaps and a current aggregate fixed rate of 3.1973% on borrowings under the 2017 Term Loan.
After electing to use the defined leverage ratio to determine the interest rate, the interest rate under the 2017 Term Loan is currently based on the following total leverage ratio grid:
|
|
|
| Interest Rate - |
|
|
|
|
| Applicable Basis Points |
|
|
| Interest Rate - |
| Above LIBOR for |
|
|
| Applicable Basis |
| Alternate Base Rate |
|
Total Leverage Ratio |
| Points above LIBOR |
| Loans |
|
<45% |
| 145.0 |
| 45.0 |
|
>45% and <50% (current ratio) |
| 155.0 |
| 55.0 |
|
>50% and <55% |
| 165.0 |
| 65.0 |
|
>55% |
| 195.0 |
| 95.0 |
|
Prior to the election to use the defined leverage ratio option, the interest rate on the 2017 Term Loan was based upon the Operating Partnership’s unsecured debt ratings, as follows:
|
|
|
| Interest Rate - |
|
|
|
|
| Applicable Basis Points |
|
Operating Partnership’s |
| Interest Rate - |
| Above LIBOR for |
|
Unsecured Debt Ratings: |
| Applicable Basis Points |
| Alternate Base Rate |
|
Higher of S&P or Moody’s |
| Above LIBOR |
| Loans |
|
No ratings or less than BBB-/Baa3 |
| 185.0 |
| 85.0 |
|
BBB- or Baa3 (interest rate based on Company’s election through March 5, 2018) |
| 140.0 |
| 40.0 |
|
BBB or Baa2 |
| 115.0 |
| 15.0 |
|
BBB+ or Baa1 |
| 100.0 |
| 0.0 |
|
A- or A3 or higher |
| 90.0 |
| 0.0 |
|
On up to four occasions at any time after the effective date of the 2017 Credit Agreement, the Company may elect to request (1) an increase to the existing revolving credit commitments (any such increase, the “New Revolving Credit Commitments”) and/or (2) the establishment of one or more new term loan commitments (the “New Term Commitments”, together with the 2017 Credit Commitments, the “Incremental Commitments”), by up to an aggregate amount not to exceed $350 million for all Incremental Commitments. The Company may also request that the sublimit for letters of credit available under the 2017 Credit Facility be increased to $100 million (without arranging any New Revolving Credit Commitments). No lender or letter of credit issued has any obligation to accept any Incremental Commitment or any increase to the letter of credit subfacility. There is no premium or penalty associated with full or partial prepayment of borrowings under the 2017 Credit Agreement.
The 2017 Credit Agreement, which applies to both the 2017 Credit Facility and 2017 Term Loan, includes certain restrictions and covenants which limit, among other things the incurrence of additional indebtedness, the incurrence of liens and the disposition of real estate properties (to the extent that: (i) such property dispositions cause the Company to default on any of the financial ratios of the 2017 Credit Agreement (described below), or (ii) the property dispositions are completed while the Company is under an event of default under the 2017 Credit Agreement, unless, under certain circumstances, such disposition is being carried out to cure such default), and which require compliance with financial ratios relating to the maximum leverage ratio (60 percent), the maximum amount of secured indebtedness (40 percent), the minimum amount of fixed charge coverage (1.5 times), the maximum amount of unsecured indebtedness (60 percent), the minimum amount of unencumbered property interest coverage (2.0 times) and certain investment limitations (generally 15 percent of total capitalization). If an event of default has occurred and is continuing, the entire outstanding balance under the 2017 Credit Agreement may (or, in the case of any bankruptcy event of default, shall) become immediately due and payable, and the Company will not make any excess distributions except to enable the General Partner to continue to qualify as a REIT under the IRS Code.
Before it amended and restated its unsecured revolving credit facility in January 2017, the Company had a $600 million unsecured revolving credit facility with a group of 17 lenders. The $600 million facility is expandablelenders that was scheduled to $1 billion and maturesmature in July 2017. It has two six-month extension options each requiring the payment of a 7.5 basis point fee. The interest rate on outstanding borrowings (not electing the Company’s competitive bid feature) and the facility fee on the current borrowing capacity, payable quarterly in arrears, arewas based upon the Operating Partnership’s unsecured debt ratings at the time, as follows:
Operating Partnership’s |
| Interest Rate - |
|
|
|
Unsecured Debt Ratings: |
| Applicable Basis Points |
| Facility Fee |
|
Higher of S&P or Moody’s |
| Above LIBOR |
| Basis Points |
|
No ratings or less than BBB-/Baa3 |
| 170.0 |
| 35.0 |
|
BBB- or Baa3 (since January 2017 amendment) |
| 130.0 |
| 30.0 |
|
BBB or Baa2 |
| 110.0 |
| 20.0 |
|
BBB+ or Baa1 |
| 100.0 |
| 15.0 |
|
A- or A3 or higher |
| 92.5 |
| 12.5 |
|
In January 2016, the Company obtained a $350 million unsecured term loan (“2016 Term Loan”), which matures in January 2019 with two one-year extension options. On January 7, 2019, the Company exercised the first one-year extension option with the payment of an extension fee of $0.5 million, which extended the maturity of the 2016 Term Loan to January 2020. The interest rate for the term loan is based on the Operating Partnership’s unsecured debt ratings, or, at the Company’s option, a defined leverage ratio. Effective March 6, 2018, the Company elected to determine its interest rate under the 2016 Term Loan using the defined leverage ratio option, resulting in an interest rate of LIBOR plus 155 basis points. The Company entered into interest rate swap arrangements to fix LIBOR for the duration of the term loan. Including costs, the current all-in fixed rate is 3.28 percent. The proceeds from the loan were used primarily to repay outstanding borrowings on the Company’s then existing unsecured revolving credit facility and to repay $200 million senior unsecured notes that matured on January 15, 2016.
After electing to use the defined leverage ratio to determine the interest rate, the interest rate under the 2016 Term Loan is currently based on the following total leverage ratio grid:
Interest Rate - | |||
Applicable Basis | |||
Total Leverage Ratio | Points above LIBOR | ||
<45% | 145.0 | ||
>45% and <50% (current ratio) | 155.0 | ||
>50% and <55% | 165.0 | ||
>55% | 195.0 |
Prior to the election to use the defined interest leverage ratio option, the interest rate on the 2016 Term Loan was based upon the Operating Partnership’s unsecured debt ratings, as follows:
| Operating Partnership's | Interest Rate - | |||
| Unsecured Debt Ratings: | Applicable Basis Points | Facility Fee | ||
| Higher of S&P or Moody's | Above LIBOR | Basis Points | ||
| No ratings or less than BBB-/Baa3 | 170.0 | 35.0 | ||
| BBB- or Baa3 (current) | 130.0 | 30.0 | ||
| BBB or Baa2 | 110.0 | 20.0 | ||
| BBB+ or Baa1 | 100.0 | 15.0 | ||
| A- or A3 or higher | 92.5 | 12.5 |
Operating Partnership’s | Interest Rate - | ||
Unsecured Debt Ratings: | Applicable Basis Points | ||
Higher of S&P or Moody’s | Above LIBOR | ||
No ratings or less than BBB-/Baa3 | 185.0 | ||
BBB- or Baa3 (interest rate based on Company’s election through March 5, 2018) | 140.0 | ||
BBB or Baa2 | 115.0 | ||
BBB+ or Baa1 | 100.0 | ||
A- or A3 or higher | 90.0 |
The terms of the unsecured facility2016 Term Loan include certain restrictions and covenants which limit, among other things the incurrence of additional indebtedness, the incurrence of liens and the disposition of real estate properties (to the extent that: (i) such property dispositions cause the Company to default on any of the financial ratios of the facilityterm loan described below, or (ii) the property dispositions are completed while the Company is under an event of default under the facility,term loan, unless, under certain circumstances, such disposition is being carried out to cure such default), and which require compliance with financial ratios relating to the maximum leverage ratio (60 percent), the maximum amount of secured indebtedness (40 percent), the minimum amount of fixed charge coverage (1.5 times), the maximum amount of unsecured indebtedness (60 percent), the minimum amount of unencumbered property interest coverage (2.0 times) and certain investment limitations (generally 15 percent of total capitalization). If an event of default has occurred and is continuing, the Company will not make any excess distributions except to enable the CompanyGeneral Partner to continue to qualify as a REIT under the IRS Code.
On August 30, 2018, the Company entered into an amendment to the 2017 Credit Agreement (the “2017 Credit Agreement Amendment”) and an amendment to the 2016 Term Loan (the “2016 Term Loan Amendment”).
Each of the 2017 Credit Agreement Amendment and the 2016 Term Loan Amendment is effective as of June 30, 2018 and provides for the following material amendments to the terms of both the 2017 Credit Agreement and 2016 Term Loan):
1. The unsecured debt ratio covenant has been modified with respect to the measurement of the unencumbered collateral pool of assets in the calculation of such ratio for the period commencing July 1, 2018 and continuing until December 31, 2019 to allow the Operating Partnership to utilize the “as-is” appraised value of the properties known as ‘Harborside Plaza I’ and ‘Harborside Plaza V’ properties located in Jersey City, NJ in such calculation; and
2. A new covenant has been added that prohibits the Company from making any optional or voluntary payment, repayment, repurchase or redemption of any unsecured indebtedness of the Company (or any subsidiaries) that matures after January 25, 2022, at any time when any of the Total Leverage Ratio or the unsecured debt ratio covenants exceeds 60 percent (all as defined in the 2017 Credit Agreement and the 2016 Term Loan) or an appraisal is being used to determine the value of Harborside Plaza I and Harborside Plaza V for the unsecured debt ratio covenant.
All other terms and conditions of the 2017 Credit Agreement and the 2016 Term Loan remain unchanged.
The Company was in compliance with its debt covenants under its unsecured revolving credit facility and term loans as of December 31, 2015.
As of December 31, 2015,2018 and 2017, the Company hadCompany’s unsecured credit facility and term loans totaled $790.9 million and $822.3 million, respectively, comprised of: $117 million of outstanding borrowings under its unsecured revolving credit facility, $350.0 million from the 2016 Term Loan and $323.9 million from the 2017 Term Loan (net of $155unamortized deferred financing costs of $1.1 million) as of December 31, 2018, and $150 million of outstanding borrowings under its unsecured revolving credit facility and had no outstanding borrowings under$349.0 million from the facility2016 Term Loan (net of unamortized deferred financing costs of $1.0 million) $323.3 million from the 2017 Term Loan (net of unamortized deferred financing costs of $1.7 million) as of December 31, 2014.
9. MORTGAGES, LOANS PAYABLE AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS
The Company has mortgages, loans payable and other obligations which primarily consist of various loans collateralized by certain of the Company’s rental properties, land and development projects. As of December 31, 2015, 232018, 16 of the Company’s properties, with a total carrying value of approximately $739 million,$2.1 billion, and fourone of the Company’s land and development projects, with a total carrying value of approximately $215$142 million, are encumbered by the Company’s mortgages and loans payable. Payments on mortgages, loans payable and other obligations are generally due in monthly installments of principal and interest, or interest only. Except as noted below, theThe Company was in compliance with its debt covenants under its mortgages and loans payable as of December 31, 2015.
A summary of the Company’s mortgages, loans payable and other obligations as of December 31, 20152018 and 20142017 is as follows: follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
| Effective |
| December 31, |
| December 31, |
|
|
| ||
Property/Project Name |
| Lender |
| Rate (a) |
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| Maturity |
| ||
Harborside Plaza 5 (b) |
| The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co. & New York Life Insurance Co. |
| 6.84 | % | $ | — |
| $ | 209,257 |
|
|
|
23 Main Street (c) |
| Berkadia CMBS |
| 5.59 | % | — |
| 27,090 |
|
|
| ||
One River Center (d) |
| Guardian Life Insurance Co. |
| 7.31 | % | — |
| 40,485 |
|
|
| ||
Park Square (e) |
| Wells Fargo Bank N.A. |
| LIBOR+1.87 | % | 25,167 |
| 26,567 |
| 04/10/19 |
| ||
250 Johnson (f) |
| M&T Bank |
| LIBOR+2.35 | % | 41,769 |
| 32,491 |
| 05/20/19 |
| ||
Port Imperial 4/5 Hotel (g) |
| Fifth Third Bank & Santander |
| LIBOR+4.50 | % | 73,350 |
| 43,674 |
| 10/06/19 |
| ||
Worcester (h) |
| Citizens Bank |
| LIBOR+2.50 | % | 56,892 |
| 37,821 |
| 12/10/19 |
| ||
Monaco (i) |
| The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co. |
| 3.15 | % | 168,370 |
| 169,987 |
| 02/01/21 |
| ||
Port Imperial South 4/5 Retail |
| American General Life & A/G PC |
| 4.56 | % | 4,000 |
| 4,000 |
| 12/01/21 |
| ||
Portside 7 |
| CBRE Capital Markets/FreddieMac |
| 3.57 | % | 58,998 |
| 58,998 |
| 08/01/23 |
| ||
Alterra I & II |
| Capital One/FreddieMac |
| 3.85 | % | 100,000 |
| 100,000 |
| 02/01/24 |
| ||
The Chase at Overlook Ridge |
| New York Community Bank |
| 3.74 | % | 135,750 |
| 135,750 |
| 01/01/25 |
| ||
Portside 5/6 (j) |
| New York Life Insurance Company |
| 4.56 | % | 97,000 |
| 45,778 |
| 03/10/26 |
| ||
Marbella |
| New York Life Insurance Company |
| 4.17 | % | 131,000 |
| — |
| 08/10/26 |
| ||
101 Hudson |
| Wells Fargo CMBS |
| 3.20 | % | 250,000 |
| 250,000 |
| 10/11/26 |
| ||
Short Hills Portfolio (k) |
| Wells Fargo CMBS |
| 4.15 | % | 124,500 |
| 124,500 |
| 04/01/27 |
| ||
150 Main St. |
| Natixis Real Estate Capital LLC |
| 4.48 | % | 41,000 |
| 41,000 |
| 08/05/27 |
| ||
Port Imperial South 11 (l) |
| The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co. |
| 4.52 | % | 100,000 |
| 46,113 |
| 01/10/29 |
| ||
Port Imperial South 4/5 Garage |
| American General Life & A/G PC |
| 4.85 | % | 32,600 |
| 32,600 |
| 12/01/29 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Principal balance outstanding |
|
|
|
|
| 1,440,396 |
| 1,426,111 |
|
|
| ||
Unamortized deferred financing costs |
|
|
|
|
| (8,998 | ) | (7,976 | ) |
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total mortgages, loans payable and other obligations, net |
|
|
|
|
| $ | 1,431,398 |
| $ | 1,418,135 |
|
|
|
| Effective | December 31, | ||||||||||||
| Property/Project Name | Lender | Rate (a) | 2015 | 2014 | Maturity | ||||||||
| Overlook - Site IIID,IIIC, IIIA & | |||||||||||||
| Overlook - Site IIB (b) | Wells Fargo Bank N.A. | - | - | $ | 23,047 | - | |||||||
| 10 Independence, 4 Sylvan, 210 Clay & | |||||||||||||
| 5 Becker (c) | Wells Fargo CMBS | - | - | 58,696 | - | ||||||||
| 6 Becker, 85 Livingston, | |||||||||||||
| 75 Livingston & 20 Waterview | Wells Fargo CMBS | 10.260 | % | $ | 63,279 | 65,035 | 08/11/14 | (d) | |||||
| 9200 Edmonston Road | Principal Commercial Funding L.L.C. | 9.780 | % | 3,793 | 3,951 | 05/01/15 | (e) | ||||||
| Port Imperial South | Wells Fargo Bank N.A. | LIBOR+1.75 | % | 34,962 | 44,119 | 01/17/16 | (f) | ||||||
| 4 Becker | Wells Fargo CMBS | 9.550 | % | 40,083 | 39,421 | 05/11/16 | |||||||
| Curtis Center (g) | CCRE & PREFG | LIBOR+5.912 | % | (h) | 64,000 | 64,000 | 10/09/16 | ||||||
| Various (i) | Prudential Insurance | 6.332 | % | 143,513 | 145,557 | 01/15/17 | |||||||
| 150 Main St. | Webster Bank | LIBOR+2.35 | % | 10,937 | 1,193 | (j) | 03/30/17 | ||||||
| 23 Main Street | JPMorgan CMBS | 5.587 | % | 28,541 | 29,210 | 09/01/18 | |||||||
| Harborside Plaza 5 | The Northwestern Mutual Life | 6.842 | % | 217,736 | 221,563 | 11/01/18 | |||||||
| Insurance Co. & New York Life | |||||||||||||
| Insurance Co. | |||||||||||||
| 100 Walnut Avenue | Guardian Life Insurance Co. | 7.311 | % | 18,273 | 18,542 | 02/01/19 | |||||||
| One River Center (k) | Guardian Life Insurance Co. | 7.311 | % | 41,859 | 42,476 | 02/01/19 | |||||||
| Park Square | Wells Fargo Bank N.A. | LIBOR+1.872 | % | (l) | 27,500 | 27,500 | 04/10/19 | ||||||
| Port Imperial South 4/5 Retail | American General Life & A/G PC | 4.559 | % | 4,000 | 4,000 | 12/01/21 | |||||||
| Port Imperial South 4/5 Garage | American General Life & A/G PC | 4.853 | % | 32,600 | 32,600 | 12/01/29 | |||||||
| Total mortgages, loans payable and other obligations | $ | 731,076 | $ | 820,910 | |||||||||
(a) | ||
Reflects effective rate of debt, including deferred financing costs, comprised of the cost of terminated treasury lock agreements (if any), debt initiation costs, mark-to-market adjustment of acquired debt and other transaction costs, as applicable. | ||
(b) | On | |
(c) | On March 1, 2018, the Company | |
(d) | Mortgage was collateralized by the three properties comprising One River Center. On March 29, 2018, the Company | |
(e) | On January 16, 2019, the loan was repaid using proceeds from the disposition of | |
(f) | ||
This construction loan has a maximum borrowing capacity of | ||
(g) | This construction loan has a maximum borrowing capacity of $94 million and provides, subject to certain conditions, two one-year extension options with a fee of 20 basis points for each year. See Note 12: Commitments and Contingencies - Construction Projects. | |
(h) | This construction loan has a maximum borrowing capacity of $58 million and provides, subject to certain conditions, two one-year extension options with a fee of 15 basis points each year. | |
(i) | This mortgage loan, which includes unamortized fair value adjustment of $3.4 million as of December 31, 2018, was assumed by the | |
(j) | On December 7, 2018, the Company refinanced this loan, due to which unamortized deferred financing costs of | |
(k) | This mortgage loan was obtained by the Company in March 2017 to partially fund the acquisition of the Short Hills/Madison portfolio. | |
(l) | On December 17, 2018, the Company refinanced this loan, due to which unamortized deferred financing costs of $0.3 million pertaining to the initial loan were written off. Concurrent with the refinancing, the Company repaid in full the property’s $70.1 million construction loan and obtained a new loan in the amount of $100 million. |
Scheduled principal payments for the Company’s senior unsecured notes (see Note 8)7), unsecured revolving credit facility and term loan (see Note 9)8) and mortgages, loans payable and other obligations as of December 31, 20152018 are as follows: follows (dollars in thousands):
|
| Scheduled |
| Principal |
|
|
| |||
Period |
| Amortization |
| Maturities |
| Total |
| |||
2019 (a) |
| $ | 532 |
| $ | 546,711 |
| $ | 547,243 |
|
2020 |
| 2,903 |
| 325,000 |
| 327,903 |
| |||
2021 |
| 3,227 |
| 285,800 |
| 289,027 |
| |||
2022 |
| 3,284 |
| 300,000 |
| 303,284 |
| |||
2023 |
| 3,412 |
| 333,998 |
| 337,410 |
| |||
Thereafter |
| 7,230 |
| 991,929 |
| 999,159 |
| |||
Sub-total |
| 20,588 |
| 2,783,438 |
| 2,804,026 |
| |||
Adjustment for unamortized debt discount/premium, net December 31, 2018 |
| (2,838 | ) | — |
| (2,838 | ) | |||
Unamortized mark to market |
| 3,370 |
| — |
| 3,370 |
| |||
Unamortized deferred financing costs |
| (11,907 | ) |
|
| (11,907 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Totals/Weighted Average |
| $ | 9,213 |
| $ | 2,783,438 |
| $ | 2,792,651 |
|
(a)
| Scheduled | Principal | |||||||
| Period | Amortization | Maturities | Total | |||||
| 2016 | $ | 8,125 | $ | 406,465 | $ | 414,590 | ||
| 2017 | 7,275 | 557,088 | 564,363 | |||||
| 2018 | 7,311 | 231,536 | 238,847 | |||||
| 2019 | 723 | 331,567 | 332,290 | |||||
| 2020 | 569 | - | 569 | |||||
| Thereafter | 5,759 | 605,206 | 610,965 | |||||
| Sub-total | 29,762 | 2,131,862 | 2,161,624 | |||||
| Adjustment for unamortized debt | ||||||||
| discount/premium, net, as of | ||||||||
| December 31, 2015 | (6,704) | - | (6,704) | |||||
| Totals/Weighted Average | $ | 23,058 | $ | 2,131,862 | $ | 2,154,920 |
CASH PAID FOR INTEREST AND INTEREST CAPITALIZED
Cash paid for interest for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016 was $115,123,000, $119,664,000$97,744,000, $103,559,000 and $123,213,000,$122,414,000, respectively. Interest capitalized by the Company for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016 was $16,217,000, $15,470,000,$27,047,000, $20,240,000, and $12,885,000,$19,316,000, respectively (of which these(which amounts included $5,325,000, $4,646,000$816,000, $1,056,000 and $1,326,000$5,055,000 for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013,2016, respectively, forof interest capitalized on the Company’s investments in unconsolidated joint ventures which were substantially in development).
SUMMARY OF INDEBTEDNESS
As of December 31, 2015,2018, the Company’s total indebtedness of $2,154,920,000$2,807,396,000 (weighted average interest rate of 5.223.89 percent) was comprised of $292,399,000$314,177,000 of unsecured revolving credit facility borrowings and other variable rate mortgage debt (weighted average rate of 2.814.90 percent) and fixed rate debt and other obligations of $1,862,521,000$2,493,219,000 (weighted average rate of 5.603.76 percent).
As of December 31, 2014,2017, the Company’s total indebtedness of $2,088,654,000$2,826,110,000 (weighted average interest rate of 5.643.93 percent) was comprised of $159,860,000$382,443,000 of unsecured revolving credit facility borrowings and other variable rate mortgage debt (weighted average rate of 3.833.63 percent) and fixed rate debt and other obligations of $1,928,794,000$2,443,667,000 (weighted average rate of 5.793.98 percent).
10. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 401(k) PLANS
Employees of the Company,General Partner, who meet certain minimum age and service requirements, are eligible to participate in the Mack-Cali Realty Corporation 401(k) Savings/Retirement Plan (the “401(k) Plan”). Eligible employees may elect to defer from one percent up to 60 percent of their annual compensation on a pre-tax basis to the 401(k) Plan, subject to certain limitations imposed by federal law. The amounts contributed by employees are immediately vested and non-forfeitable. The Company may make discretionary matching or profit sharing contributions to the 401(k) Plan on behalf of eligible participants in any plan year. Participants are always 100 percent vested in their pre-tax contributions and will begin vesting in any matching or profit sharing contributions made on their behalf after two years of service with the Company at a rate of 20 percent per year, becoming 100 percent vested after a total of six years of service with the Company. All contributions are allocated as a percentage of compensation of the eligible participants for the Plan year. The assets of the 401(k) Plan are held in trust and a separate account is established for each participant. A participant may receive a distribution of his or her vested account balance in the 401(k) Plan in a single sum or in installment payments upon his or her termination of service with the Company. Total expense recognized by the Company for the 401(k) Plan for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016 was $970,000, zero$886,000, $1,055,000 and $117,000,$1,029,000, respectively.
The following disclosure of estimated fair value was determined by management using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize on disposition of the assets and liabilities at December 31, 20152018 and 2014.2017. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
Cash equivalents, receivables, notes receivables, accounts payable, and accrued expenses and other liabilities are carried at amounts which reasonably approximate their fair values as of December 31, 20152018 and 2014.
The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt, consisting of senior unsecured notes, unsecured term loans, an unsecured revolving credit facility and mortgages, loans payable and other obligations aggregated approximately $2,160,034,000$2,711,712,000 and $2,133,214,000$2,764,033,000 as compared to the book value of approximately $2,154,920,000$2,792,651,000 and $2,088,654,000$2,809,568,000 as of December 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, respectively. The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt was categorized as a level 3 basis (as provided by ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures). The fair value was estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis valuation based on the borrowing rates currently available to the Company for loans with similar terms and maturities. The fair value of the mortgage debt and the unsecured notes was determined by discounting the future contractual interest and principal payments by a market rate. Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivative financial instruments fall within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivative financial instruments utilize level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. The Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivative financial instruments. As a result, the Company has determined that its derivative financial instruments valuations in their entirety are classified in level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The fair value measurements used in the evaluation of the Company’s rental properties are considered to be Level 3 valuations within the fair value hierarchy, as there are significant unobservable inputs. Examples of inputs that were utilized in the fair value calculations include estimated holding periods, discount rates, market capitalization rates, expected lease rental rates, and third party broker information.
Valuations of rental property identified as held for sale are based on estimated sale prices, net of estimated selling costs, of such property.
The valuation techniquesCompany identified as held for sale six office properties and significant unobservable inputs useda 159 unit multi-family rental property as of December 31, 2018 with an aggregate carrying value for the Company’s Level 3rental property of $108.8 million. The total estimated sales proceeds, net of expected selling costs, from the sales are expected to be approximately $124 million. The Company determined that the carrying value of four of the properties was not expected to be recovered from estimated net sales proceeds and accordingly recognized an unrealized loss allowance of $20.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.
The Company identified as held for sale 21 office properties as of December 31, 2017 with an aggregate carrying value of $171.6 million. The total estimated sales proceeds from the sales were expected to be approximately $223 million. The Company determined that the carrying value of seven of these properties was not expected to be recovered from estimated net sales proceeds and accordingly recognized an unrealized loss allowance of $12.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2017.
The Company owns two separate developable land parcels in Conshohocken and Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, that were being considered for development into multi-family rental properties. During the fourth quarter 2018, the Company made the decision to pursue selling the land parcels as opposed to development. Due to the shortening of the expected periods of ownership, the Company determined that it was necessary to reduce the carrying values of the land parcels to their estimated fair values (ascertained by broker opinions of value measurementsobtained during the marketing process) and recorded a land impairments charge of $24.6 million at December 31, 2015 were as follows:
Disclosure about fair value of assets and liabilities is based on pertinent information available to management as of December 31, 20152018 and 2014.2017. Although management is not aware of any factors that would significantly affect the fair value amounts, such amounts have not been comprehensively revalued for purposes of these financial statements since December 31, 20152018 and current estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein.
TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENTS
Pursuant to agreements with certain municipalities, the Company is required to make payments in lieu of property taxes (“PILOT”) on certain of its properties and has tax abatement agreements on other properties, as follows:
The Harborside Plaza 4-A agreement with the City of Jersey City, as amended, which commenced in 2002, is for a term of 20 years. The annual PILOT is equal to two percent of Total Project Costs, as defined. Total Project Costs are $49.5 million. The PILOT totaled $990,000$1.1 million, $1.1 million and $1.1 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013.
The Harborside Plaza 5 agreement, also with the City of Jersey City, as amended, which commenced in 2002, is for a term of 20 years. The annual PILOT is equal to two percent of Total Project Costs, as defined. Total Project Costs are $170.9 million. The PILOT totaled $3.4$4.4 million, $3.9 million and $3.9 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013.
The Port Imperial 4/5 Garage development project agreement with the City of Weehawken had a term of five years beginning when the project was substantially complete, which occurred in 2013. The agreement, which expired in December 2018, provided that real estate taxes be paid initially on the land value of the project only and allowed for itsa phase in of real estate taxes on the value of the improvements at zero percent year one and 80 percent in years two through five.
The Port Imperial 4/5 garageSouth 1/3 Garage development project agreement with the City of Weehawken has a term of five years beginning when the project is substantially complete, which occurred in the thirdfourth quarter 2013.of 2015. The agreement provides that real estate taxes be paid initiallyat 100 percent on the land value of the project only over the five year period and allows for a phase in of real estate taxes on the building improvement value of the improvements over a fiveat zero percent in year period.
The Port Imperial Hotel development project agreement with the City of RahwayWeehawken is for its Park Square multi-family rental property provided that real estate taxes would be partially abated,a term of 15 years following substantial completion, which commenced initial operation in December 2018. The annual PILOT is equal to two percent of Total Project Costs, as defined therein.
The Port Imperial South 11 development project agreement with the City of Weehawken is for a term of 15 years following substantial completion, which occurred in August 2018. The annual PILOT is equal to 10 percent of Gross Revenues, as defined therein.
The 111 River Realty agreement with the City of Hoboken, which commenced on October 1, 2001 expires in April 2022. The PILOT payment equaled $1.2 million annually through April 2017 and then increased to $1.4 million annually until expiration. The PILOT totaled $1.4 million, $1.3 million and $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
The Monaco Towers agreement with the City of Jersey City, which commenced in 2011, is for a declining scale,term of 10 years. The annual PILOT is equal to 10 percent of gross revenues, as defined. The PILOT totaled $2.4 million for fourthe year ended December 31, 2018 and $1.6 million for the period from acquisition (April 2017) through December 31, 2017.
The Marbella Tower agreement with the City of Jersey City, which commenced in 2003, expired in December 2018. The annual PILOT was equal to 15 percent of gross revenues, as defined therein. The PILOT totaled $0.9 million for the period from acquisition (August 2018), through December 31, 2018.
The Marbella II agreement with the City of Jersey City, which commenced in 2016, is for a term of 10 years. The annual PILOT is equal to 10 percent of gross revenues for Years 1-4, 12 percent of gross revenues for Years 5-8 and 14 percent of gross revenue for years through 2015.
The Port Imperial South Parcel 8/9 development project agreement with the City of Weehawken is for a term of 25 years following substantial completion, which is anticipated to occur in the fourth quarter 2020. The annual PILOT is equal to 11 percent of gross revenue for Years 1-10, 12.5 percent for Years 11-18 and 14 percent for Years 19-25, as defined therein.
At the conclusion of the above-referenced agreements, it is expected that the properties will be assessed by the municipality and be subject to real estate taxes at the then prevailing rates.
LITIGATION
The Company is a defendant in litigation arising in the normal course of its business activities. Management does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a materially adverse effect upon the Company’s financial condition taken as whole.
Future minimum rental payments under the terms of all non-cancelable ground leases under which the Company is the lessee, as of December 31, 2015,2018, are as follows: follows (dollars in thousands):
| Year | Amount | |
| 2016 | $ | 387 |
| 2017 | 267 | |
| 2018 | 232 | |
| 2019 | 235 | |
| 2020 | 235 | |
| 2021 through 2084 | 15,348 | |
| Total | $ | 16,704 |
Year |
| Amount |
| |
2019 |
| $ | 2,470 |
|
2020 |
| 2,491 |
| |
2021 |
| 2,491 |
| |
2022 |
| 2,491 |
| |
2023 |
| 2,491 |
| |
2024 through 2084 |
| 210,117 |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Total |
| $ | 222,551 |
|
Ground lease expense incurred by the Company during each of the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016 amounted to $406,000.
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
In 2015, the Company recognized chargesentered into a 90-percent owned joint venture with XS Port Imperial Hotel, LLC to form XS Hotel Urban Renewal Associates LLC, which is developing a 372-key hotel (164 keys Residence Inn and benefits related208 keys Marriott Envue) in Weehawken, New Jersey. The Residence Inn opened in 4Q 2018 and the Marriott Envue is expected to changesopen in fair value in the Earn Out liability and, as a result2Q 2019. The construction of the achievementproject is estimated to cost $159.9 million, with construction costs of certain of$147.1 million incurred by the defined criteria, paid certain amounts such that there was no remaining amount in the Earn Outventure through December 31, 2018. The project costs are expected to be funded from a $94 million construction loan (with $73.4 million outstanding as of December 31, 2015. Related2018).
The Company is developing a 313-unit multi-family project known as Building 8/9 at Port Imperial in Weehawken, New Jersey, which began construction in third quarter 2018. The construction project, which is estimated to changescost $142.6 million, of which construction costs of $35.4 million have been incurred through December 31, 2018, is expected to be ready for occupancy in fourth quarter 2020. The Company is expected to fund $50.6 million of construction costs, of which the Company has funded $35.4 million as of December 31, 2018, and the remaining construction costs are expected to be funded primarily from a $92 million construction loan.
The Company is developing a 326-unit multi-family project known as Chase III at Overlook Ridge in Malden, Massachusetts, which began construction in third quarter 2018. The construction project, which is estimated to cost $99.9 million, of which $20.2 million have been incurred through December 31, 2018, is expected to be ready for occupancy in fourth quarter 2020. The Company is expected to fund $37.9 million of construction costs, of which the Company has funded $20.2 million as of December 31, 2018, and the remaining construction costs are expected to be funded primarily from a $62 million construction loan.
CHANGES IN EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
On October 31, 2018, RRT entered into a separation and consulting agreement with Robert Andrew Marshall, the President and Executive Vice President of Development of RRT (the “Separation and Consulting Agreement”). Pursuant to the Separation and Consulting Agreement, Mr. Marshall’s employment with RRT was terminated, effective as of October 31, 2018 (the “Termination Date”), and Mr. Marshall has agreed to provide consulting services to RRT and the Company during the period beginning on November 1, 2018 and ending on March 31, 2019 (the “Consulting Period”).
Under the terms of the Separation and Consulting Agreement, Mr. Marshall will receive the following separation payments:
· accrued but unpaid base salary through October 31, 2018;
�� unreimbursed expenses incurred by Mr. Marshall prior to the Termination Date; and
· COBRA payments through January 31, 2019, in an aggregate amount equal to approximately $7,533.
· In addition, during the Consulting Period, Mr. Marshall will receive a monthly consulting fee of $22,500.
· The Separation and Consulting Agreement provides that Mr. Marshall will continue to vest during the Consulting Period in all of the 22,120 Time-Based Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards originally issued in March 2016 (the “Vested 2016 Time-Based LTIP Awards”) and 28,880 of the 35,697 Performance-Based Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards originally issued in March 2016 (the “Vested 2016 Performance-Based LTIP Awards” and, together with the Vested 2016 Time-Based LTIP Awards, the “Vested 2016 LTIP Awards”). The Vested 2016 LTIP awards will vest on the earliest to occur of (i) Mr. Marshall’s death, (ii) the termination of Mr. Marshall’s consulting services by the Company for any reason other than for Cause (as defined in the fair valueSeparation and Consulting Agreement) prior to March 31, 2019 or (iii) March 8, 2019 (such earliest date, the “Vesting Date”), subject to Mr. Marshall’s continuous performance of the Earn Out liability,consulting services through the applicable Vesting Date. All other equity awards previously issued to Mr. Marshall, including the remaining 6,817 Performance-Based LTIP Awards
originally issued in March 2016, 4,449 Time-Based Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards originally issued in April 2017, 13,473 Performance-Based Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards originally issued in April 2017, 11,799 Time-Based Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards originally issued in April 2018, and 22,676 Performance-Based Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards originally issued in April 2018, expired and were forfeited and cancelled, effective as of the Termination Date.
· The Separation and Consulting Agreement further provides that on the earliest to occur of (i) March 11, 2019, (ii) five (5) business days after RRT receives written notice of Mr. Marshall’s death, or (iii) the date on which Mr. Marshall’s consulting services are terminated by the Company recognizedfor any reason other than for Cause, the Company will purchase from Mr. Marshall all of the Vested 2016 LTIP Awards for an aggregate purchase price in cash equal to the product of (x) the total number of Vested 2016 LTIP Awards (which will amount to a net chargetotal of $219,00051,000) and (y) the average closing price per share of the Company’s common stock, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange for the period of five trading days ending on the applicable Vesting Date.
The Company’s total estimated costs in connection with the departure of Mr. Marshall of approximately $0.1 million (net of a reversal of $0.3 million of amortization of stock compensation expense due to the forfeiture of the unvested securities) during the year ended December 31, 2015, and recognized benefits of $1.5 million and $2.3 million during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Earn Out liability was remeasured at fair value until the contingency was resolved, with any changes in fair value representing a charge or benefit directly to earnings (with no adjustment to purchase accounting). The measures of the Earn Out were based on significant inputs that are not observable in the market, which ASC 820 refers to as level 3 inputs. In addition to an appropriate discount rate, the key assumption affecting the valuation for the Roseland assets component was the probability of occurrence of the payment events under the relevant provisions (management assumed between 92 and 99 percent for completion/start criteria and 50 percent for the tax credit/grant criteria in its initial valuation). The valuation of the TRS component included assumptions for the risk-free rate and various other factors (i.e., stock price, dividend levels and volatility) for the Company and the relevant peer group, as defined in the Earn Out agreement.
In June 2018, the General Partner entered into a separation and 2014, respectively). On January 4, 2016,general release agreement with Mitchell E. Rudin, pursuant to which Mr. Rudin’s employment with the Company satisfied $11.4as its Vice Chairman was terminated effective as of June 5, 2018.
Under the terms of the Rudin separation agreement, Mr. Rudin is entitled to receive the following separation payments:
· Accrued but unpaid base salary through June 5, 2018;
· A lump sum cash payment of $2,558,082;
· Payment of unreimbursed expenses incurred by Mr. Rudin prior to termination, in the amount of $50,000 in the aggregate; and
· COBRA payments for up to 18 months after termination, in an amount equal to approximately $34,047.
· The Rudin separation agreement reflects that certain equity awards previously issued to Mr. Rudin, including time-vesting options, restricted stock units and performance share units, vested in full as of June 5, 2018 in accordance with their terms. Pursuant to the Rudin separation agreement, other than the equity awards that were fully vested as of June 5, 2018, as set forth in the Rudin separation agreement, all other equity awards granted to Mr. Rudin, including 32,311 LTIP Units subject to time-based vesting and 175,127 LTIP Units subject to performance-based vesting, expired and were immediately forfeited and canceled, effective as of June 5, 2018.
The Company’s total estimated costs in connection with the departure of Mr. Rudin of approximately $1.2 million (net of a reversal of $1.6 million of amortization of stock compensation expense due to the accrued expense balance fromforfeiture of the unvested securities) during the year ended December 31, 2015.
In January 2018, the Company announced the appointment of David J. Smetana as chief financial officer and Nicholas Hilton as executive vice president of leasing of the General Partner. Mr. Smetana began to perform his duties as chief financial officer and Anthony Krug ceased to serve as chief financial officer immediately following the filing of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. Mr. Krug remained an employee of the General Partner and provided transition services through March 31, 2018. Mr. Hilton’s employment commenced on February 12, 2018 following the departure of Christopher DeLorenzo. In connection with these management changes, the General Partner entered into a separation agreement and release with each of Messrs. Krug and DeLorenzo.
Under the terms of the Krug separation agreement, Mr. Krug is entitled to receive the following severance benefits:
· Earned but unpaid compensation through the date of termination, including base salary, 2017 bonus (when determined), a pro rata portion of his annual car allowance, and any unused vacation time;
· A lump sum cash severance payment of $1,312,500;
· A prorated portion of his 2018 target bonus equal to $93,750;
· COBRA payments for up to two years after termination, in an amount equal to approximately $42,000; and
· Accelerated vesting of all unvested LTIP units in the Operating Partnership, consisting of 13,306 LTIP units subject to time-based vesting and 18,665 LTIP units subject to performance-based vesting, with LTIP units subject to performance-based vesting criteria vesting at target performance.
Under the terms of the DeLorenzo separation agreement, Mr. DeLorenzo is entitled to receive the following severance benefits:
· Earned but unpaid compensation through the date of termination, including base salary, 2017 bonus (when determined), a pro rata portion of his annual car allowance, and any unused vacation time;
· A lump sum cash severance payment of $500,000;
· COBRA payments for up to 18 months after termination, in an amount equal to approximately $42,000; and
· Partial accelerated vesting of unvested LTIP units in the Operating Partnership, consisting of 9,111 LTIP units subject to time based vesting and 13,982 LTIP units subject to performance-based vesting, with LTIP units subject to performance based vesting criteria vesting at target performance.
The Company expects to fundCompany’s total estimated costs in connection with the departure of Messrs. Krug and DeLorenzo of approximately $20.9$2.7 million forduring the development of the project (of which,year ended December 31, 2018 was included in general and administrative expense (approximately $43,000 was included in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities as of December 31, 2015, the Company has incurred $14.7 million of the development costs and estimates it will need to fund an additional $6.2 million for the completion of the project)2018).
OTHER
On April 1, 2015,August 11, 2017, the Company acquired an existing mortgage note receivable encumbering a vacant developable land to accommodateparcel located in Jersey City, New Jersey (the “Land Property”) with a two-phase developmentbalance of the CitySquare Project for a purchase price$44.7 million (the “Land Note Receivable”). The Land Note Receivable matures in July 2019 and earns interest at an annual rate of $3.1 million with an additional $1.25 million to be paid (which5.85 percent which accrues monthly and is accrued as of December 31, 2015), subject to certain conditions, in accordance with the terms of the purchase and sale agreement. The purchase price for the acquisition was funded primarily through borrowing under the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility. The first phase with 237 units started construction in the third quarter 2015 with anticipated initial deliveries in the second quarter 2017. The second phase, with 128 units, is projected to begin construction in 2017. On December 10, 2015,payable at maturity. In March 2018, the Company obtainedreceived a construction loan withpartial prepayment of $3 million. The Land Property is currently an unimproved land parcel which operates as a maximum borrowing amount of $41.5 million (with no outstanding balance as of December 31, 2015). Total development costs are estimated to be approximately $92.5 million (of which $9.1 million was incurred by the Company through December 31, 2015 and estimates it will need to fund an additional $41.9 million for the completion of the project).
Through February 2016, the Company and XS entered into a separate joint venture partnership to form XS Hotel Associates, L.L.C. (“XS Hotel”) for the management and operations of the completed hotel development. The Company holds a 90 percent interest and XS holds the remaining 10 percent interest in the consolidated joint ventures, XS Hotel URA and XS Hotel, with the Company having full and complete authority, power, and discretion to manage and control the ventures’ business, affairs, and property. The construction of the Port Imperial Hotel is estimated to cost a total of $105.9 million, which will be funded by a $94 million construction loan with the balance to be funded with members’ capital. Upon closing, Mack-Cali’s initial contribution was $27.3 million, which included a capital credit of $23.7 million for its contributed Hotel Condominium Land unit, and XS Hotel’s initial contribution was $3 million. As of December 31, 2015, the Company incurred development costs of $1.5 million and estimates it will need to fund an additional $3.3 million for the completion of the project.
14. 13. TENANT LEASES
The Properties are leased to tenants under operating leases with various expiration dates through 2035.2036. Substantially all of the commercial leases provide for annual base rents plus recoveries and escalation charges based upon the tenant’s proportionate share of and/or increases in real estate taxes and certain operating costs, as defined, and the pass-through of charges for electrical usage.
Future minimum rentals to be received under non-cancelable commercial operating leases at December 31, 20152018 are as follows (dollars in thousands):
| Year | Amount | |
| 2016 | $ | 463,029 |
| 2017 | 423,654 | |
| 2018 | 342,756 | |
| 2019 | 280,123 | |
| 2020 | 239,079 | |
| 2021 and thereafter | 902,403 | |
| Total | $ | 2,651,044 |
Year |
| Amount |
| |
2019 |
| $ | 314,708 |
|
2020 |
| 306,559 |
| |
2021 |
| 284,120 |
| |
2022 |
| 258,076 |
| |
2023 |
| 220,533 |
| |
2024 and thereafter |
| 923,061 |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Total |
| $ | 2,307,057 |
|
Multi-family rental property residential leases are excluded from the above table as they generally expire within one year.
14.REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS
The Company evaluates the terms of the partnership units issued in accordance with the FASB’s Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity guidance. Units which embody an unconditional obligation requiring the Company to redeem the units for cash after a specified or determinable date (or dates) or upon the occurrence of an event that is not solely within the control of the issuer are determined to be contingently redeemable under this guidance and are included as Redeemable noncontrolling interests and classified within the mezzanine section between Total liabilities and Stockholders’ equity on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. Convertible units for which the Company has the option to settle redemption amounts in cash or Common Stock are included in the caption Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries within the equity section on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Rockpoint Transaction
On February 27, 2017, the Company, RRT, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary through which the Company conducts its multi-family residential real estate operations, Roseland Residential, L.P. (“RRLP”), the operating partnership through which RRT conducts all of its operations, and certain other affiliates of the Company entered into an equity investment agreement (the “Investment Agreement”) with Rockpoint Group, L.L.C. and certain of its affiliates (collectively, “Rockpoint”). The Investment Agreement provides for multiple equity investments by Rockpoint in RRLP from time to time for up to an aggregate of $300 million of equity units of limited partnership interests of RRLP (the “Rockpoint Units”). The initial closing under the Investment Agreement occurred on March 10, 2017 for $150 million of Rockpoint Units and the parties agreed that the Company’s contributed equity value, (“RRT Contributed Equity Value”), was $1.23 billion at closing. Additional closings of Rockpoint Units to be issued and sold to Rockpoint pursuant to the Investment Agreement may occur from time to time in increments of not less than $10 million per closing, with the balance of the full $300 million by March 1, 2019. During the year ended December 31, 2018, a total additional amount of $105 million of Rockpoint Units were issued and sold to Rockpoint pursuant to the Investment Agreement.
The Company has a participation right, where prior to March 1, 2022 and following either the full investment of $300 million by Rockpoint or in certain other limited circumstances, the Company may contribute up to $200 million to obtain equity units on substantially the same terms and conditions as the Rockpoint Units to be issued and sold to Rockpoint.
Under the terms of the transaction, the cash flow from operations of RRLP will be distributable to RRT and Rockpoint as follows:
first, to provide a 6% annual return to Rockpoint (and to the Company after it contributes to RRT to obtain equity units, as described above) on its invested capital (“Preferred Base Return”);
second, to provide a 6% annual return on the equity value of the properties contributed by it to the partnership (“RRT Base Return”) with 95% of the RRT Base Return to RRT and 5% of the RRT Base Return to Rockpoint; and
third, pro rata between Rockpoint (and the Company upon its contribution to obtain equity units) and RRT based on total respective invested capital by Rockpoint and RRT Initial Capital Contribution.
Based on Rockpoint’s $255 million invested capital and RRT’s Initial Capital Contribution, at December 31, 2018 this pro rata distribution would be approximately 17.1% to Rockpoint and 82.9% to RRT.
RRLP’s cash flow from capital events will generally be distributable to RRT and Rockpoint as follows:
first, to Rockpoint (and the Company after it contributes to RRT to obtain equity units) to the extent there is any unpaid, accrued Preferred Base Return;
second, as a return of capital to Rockpoint (and the Company after it contributes to RRT to obtain equity units);
third, to RRT to the extent there is any unpaid, accrued RRT Base Return (with Rockpoint entitled to 5% of the amounts distributable to RRT);
fourth, as a return of capital to RRT based on the equity value of the properties contributed by it to the partnership (with Rockpoint entitled to 5% of the amounts distributable to RRT);
fifth, pro rata between Rockpoint (and the Company after it contributes to RRT to obtain equity units) and RRT based on total respective invested capital and contributed equity value until Rockpoint has achieved an 11% internal rate of return; and
sixth, to Rockpoint (and to the Company after it contributes to RRT to obtain equity units) based on 50% of its pro rata share described in “fifth” above and the balance to RRT.
In general, RRLP may not sell its properties in a taxable transaction, although it may engage in tax-deferred like-kind exchanges of properties or it may proceed in another manner designed to avoid the recognition of gains for tax purposes.
Beginning March 1, 2022, except in certain limited circumstances as defined in the agreement, either RRT or Rockpoint may cause RRT to redeem (a “Put/Call Event”) all, but not less than all, of Rockpoint’s interest in the Rockpoint Units based on a liquidation value of RRLP to be determined by a third party valuation of the real estate assets and generally based on the capital event waterfall described above. On a Put/Call Event, other than the sale of RRLP, Rockpoint can either demand payment in cash or may elect to convert all, but not less than all, of its investment to common equity in RRLP. As such, the Rockpoint Units contain a substantive redemption feature that is outside of the Company’s control and accordingly, pursuant to ASC 480-1—S99-3A, the Rockpoint Units are classified in mezzanine equity measured based on the estimated future redemption value as of December 31, 2018. The Company determines the redemption value of these interests by hypothetically liquidating the estimated Net Asset Value (“NAV”) of the RRT real estate portfolio including debt principal through the applicable waterfall provisions of the RRLP partnership agreement. The estimation of NAV includes unobservable inputs that consider assumptions of market participants in pricing the underlying assets of RRLP. For properties under development, the Company applies a discount rate to the estimated future cash flows allocable to the Company during the period under construction and then applies a direct capitalization method to the estimated stabilized cash flows. For operating properties the direct capitalization method is used by applying a capitalization rate to the projected net operating income. Estimated future cash flows used in such analyses are based on the Company’s business plan for each respective property including capital expenditures, management’s views of market and economic conditions, and considers items such as current and future rental rates, occupancies and market transactions for comparable properties. The estimated future redemption value of Rockpoint Units is approximately $330 million as of December 31, 2018.
Preferred Units
On February 3, 2017, the Operating Partnership issued 42,800 shares of a new class of 3.5 percent Series A Preferred Limited Partnership Units of the Operating Partnership (the “Series A Units”). The Series A Units were issued to the Company’s partners in the Plaza VIII & IX Associates L.L.C. joint venture that owns a development site adjacent to the Company’s Harborside property in Jersey City, New Jersey as non-cash consideration for their approximate 37.5 percent interest in the joint venture.
Each Series A Unit has a stated value of $1,000, pays dividends quarterly at an annual rate of 3.5 percent (subject to increase under certain circumstances), is convertible into 28.15 common units of limited partnership interests of the Operating Partnership beginning generally five years from the date of issuance, or an aggregate of up to 1,204,820 common units. The conversion rate was based on a value of $35.52 per common unit. The Series A Units have a liquidation and dividend preference senior to the common units and include customary anti-dilution protections for stock splits and similar events. The Series A Units are redeemable for cash at their stated value beginning five years from the date of issuance at the option of the holder.
On February 28, 2017, the Operating Partnership authorized the issuance of 9,213 shares of a new class of 3.5 percent Series A-1 Preferred Limited Partnership Units of the Operating Partnership (the “Series A-1 Units”). 9,122 Series A-1 Units were issued on February 28, 2017 and an additional 91 Series A-1 Units were issued in April 2017 pursuant to acquiring additional interests in a joint venture that owns Monaco Towers in Jersey City, New Jersey. The Series A-1 Units were issued as non-cash consideration for the partner’s approximate 13.8 percent ownership interest in the joint venture.
Each Series A-1 Unit has a stated value of $1,000 (the “Stated Value”), pays dividends quarterly at an annual rate equal to the greater of (x) 3.5 percent, or (y) the then-effective annual dividend yield on the General Partner’s common stock, and is convertible into 27.936 common units of limited partnership interests of the Operating Partnership beginning generally five years from the date of issuance, or an aggregate of up to 257,375 Common Units. The conversion rate was based on a value of $35.80 per common unit. The Series A-1 Units have a liquidation and dividend preference senior to the Common Units and include customary anti-dilution protections for stock splits and similar events. The Series A-1 Units are redeemable for cash at their stated value beginning five years from the date of issuance at the option of the holder. The Series A-1 Units are pari passu with the 42,800 3.5% Series A Units issued on February 3, 2017.
The following table sets forth the changes in Redeemable noncontrolling interests for the year ended December 31, 2018 (dollars in thousands):
|
| Series A and |
|
|
| Total |
| |||
|
| A-1 Preferred |
| Rockpoint |
| Redeemable |
| |||
|
| Units |
| Interests |
| Noncontrolling |
| |||
|
| In MCRLP |
| in RRT |
| Interests |
| |||
Balance January 1, 2018 |
| $ | 52,324 |
| $ | 159,884 |
| $ | 212,208 |
|
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests Issued |
| — |
| 105,000 |
| 105,000 |
| |||
Net |
| 52,324 |
| 264,884 |
| 317,208 |
| |||
Income Attributed to Noncontrolling Interests |
| 1,820 |
| 12,159 |
| 13,979 |
| |||
Distributions |
| (1,820 | ) | (12,159 | ) | (13,979 | ) | |||
Redemption Value Adjustment |
| — |
| 13,251 |
| 13,251 |
| |||
Redeemable noncontrolling interests as of December 31, 2018 |
| $ | 52,324 |
| $ | 278,135 |
| $ | 330,459 |
|
15.MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
To maintain its qualification as a REIT, not more than 50 percent in value of the outstanding shares of the CompanyGeneral Partner may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals at any time during the last half of any taxable year of the Company,General Partner, other than its initial taxable year (defined to include certain entities), applying certain constructive ownership rules. To help ensure that the CompanyGeneral Partner will not fail this test, the Company’sGeneral Partner’s Charter provides, among other things, certain restrictions on the transfer of common stock to prevent further concentration of stock ownership. Moreover, to evidence compliance with these requirements, the CompanyGeneral Partner must maintain records that disclose the actual ownership of its outstanding common stock and demands written statements each year from the holders of record of designated percentages of its common stock requesting the disclosure of the beneficial owners of such common stock.
Partners’ Capital in the accompanying consolidated financial statements relates to (a) General Partners’ capital consisting of common units in the Operating Partnership held by the General Partner, and (b) Limited Partners’ capital consisting of common units and LTIP units held by the limited partners. See Note 16: Noncontrolling Interests in Subsidiaries.
Any transactions resulting in the issuance of additional common and preferred stock of the General Partner result in a corresponding issuance by the Operating Partnership of an equivalent amount of common and preferred units to the General Partner.
SHARE/UNIT REPURCHASE PROGRAM
In September 2012, the Board of Directors of the General Partner renewed and authorized an increase to the Company’sGeneral Partner’s repurchase program (“Repurchase Program”). The CompanyGeneral Partner has authorization to repurchase up to $150 million of its outstanding common stock under the renewed Repurchase Program, which it may repurchase from time to time in open market transactions at prevailing prices or through privately negotiated transactions. The CompanyAs of December 31, 2018, the General Partner has purchasedrepurchased and retired 394,625 shares of its outstanding common stock for an aggregate cost of approximately $11 million (all of which occurred in the year ended December 31, 2012), with a remaining authorization under the Repurchase Program of $139 million.
DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT AND STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
The CompanyGeneral Partner has a Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (the “DRIP”) which commenced in March 1999 under which approximately 5.5 million shares of the Company’sGeneral Partner’s common stock have been reserved for future issuance. The DRIP provides for automatic reinvestment of all or a portion of a participant’s dividends from the Company’sGeneral Partner’s shares of common stock. The DRIP also permits participants to make optional cash investments up to $5,000 a month without restriction and, if the Company waives this limit, for additional amounts subject to certain restrictions and other conditions set forth in the DRIP prospectus filed as part of the Company’s effective registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC for the approximately 5.5 million shares of the Company’sGeneral Partner’s common stock reserved for issuance under the DRIP.
STOCK OPTION PLANS
In May 2013, the CompanyGeneral Partner established the 2013 Incentive Stock Plan (the “2013 Plan”) under which a total of 4,600,000 shares have been reserved for issuance. In May 2004, the Company established the 2004 Incentive Stock Plan (the “2004 Plan”) under which a total of 2,500,000 shares had been reserved for issuance. The 2004 Plan was terminated upon establishment of the 2013 Plan. No options were granted under the 2004 Plan. In September 2000, the Company established the 2000 Employee Stock Option Plan (“2000 Employee Plan”) and the Amended and Restated 2000 Director Stock Option Plan (“2000 Director Plan” and together with the 2000 Employee Plan, the “2000 Plans”). In May 2002, shareholders of the Company approved amendments to both of the 2000 Plans to increase the total shares reserved for issuance under both of the 2000 Plans from 2,700,000 to 4,350,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (from 2,500,000 to 4,000,000 shares under the 2000 Employee Plan and from 200,000 to 350,000 shares under the 2000 Director Plan). As the 2000 Plans expired in 2010, stock options may no longer be issued under those plans. Stock options granted under the 2000 Employee Plan became exercisable over a five-year period. All stock options granted under the 2000 Director Plan became exercisable in one year. All options were granted at the fair market value at the dates of grant and have terms of 10 years. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the stock options outstanding had a weighted average remaining contractual life of approximately 9.4 years and 4.9 years, respectively.
On June 5, 2015, in connection with employment agreements entered into with each of Messrs. Rudin and DeMarco (together, the Executive“Executive Employment Agreements,Agreements”), the Company granted options to purchase a total of 800,000 shares of the Company’sGeneral Partner’s common stock, exercisable for a period of ten years with an exercise price equal to the closing price of the Company’sGeneral Partner’s common stock on the grant date of $17.31 per share, with 400,000 of such options vesting in three equal annual installments commencing on the first anniversary of the grant date (“Time Vesting Options”), and fully vesting on June 5, 2018, and 400,000 of such options vesting if the Company’sGeneral Partner’s common stock trades at or above $25.00 per share for 30 consecutive trading days while the executive is employed (“Price Vesting Options”), or on or before June 30, 2019, subject to certain conditions.
Information regarding the Company’s stock option plans is summarized below:
| Weighted | Aggregate | ||||||
| Average | Intrinsic | ||||||
| Shares | Exercise | Value | |||||
| Under Options | Price | $(000’s) | |||||
| Outstanding at January 1, 2013 | 183,870 | $ | 29.51 | - | |||
| Lapsed or Cancelled | (168,870) | 28.53 | |||||
| Outstanding at December 31, 2013 ($35.59 – $45.47) | 15,000 | $ | 40.54 | - | |||
| Granted | 5,000 | 21.25 | |||||
| Lapsed or Cancelled | (10,000) | 38.07 | |||||
| Outstanding at December 31, 2014 ($21.25 - $45.47) | 10,000 | $ | 33.36 | - | |||
| Granted | 800,000 | 17.31 | |||||
| Lapsed or Cancelled | (5,000) | 45.47 | |||||
| Outstanding at December 31, 2015 ($17.31 – $21.25) | 805,000 | $ | 17.33 | $ | 4,843 | ||
| Options exercisable at December 31, 2015 | - | ||||||
| Available for grant at December 31, 2015 | 3,416,581 |
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||
| Time Vesting | Price Vesting | Stock | ||||
| Options | Options | Options | ||||
| Expected life (in years) | 6.0 | 5.8 | 6.0 | |||
| Risk-free interest rate | 2.04 | % | 1.96 | % | 1.50 | % |
| Volatility | 29.0 | % | 29.0 | % | 20.26 | % |
| Dividend yield | 3.5 | % | 3.5 | % | 5.65 | % |
|
|
|
| Weighted |
| Aggregate |
| ||
|
|
|
| Average |
| Intrinsic |
| ||
|
| Shares |
| Exercise |
| Value |
| ||
|
| Under Options |
| Price |
| $(000’s) |
| ||
Outstanding at January 1, 2016 |
| 805,000 |
| $ | 17.33 |
| $ | 4,843 |
|
Lapsed or Cancelled |
| (5,000 | ) | 21.25 |
| — |
| ||
Outstanding at December 31, 2016 ($17.31) |
| 800,000 |
| $ | 17.31 |
| 9,368 |
| |
Granted, Lapsed or Cancelled |
| — |
| — |
|
|
| ||
Outstanding at December 31, 2017 ($17.31) |
| 800,000 |
| $ | 17.31 |
| 3,400 |
| |
Granted, Lapsed or Cancelled |
| — |
| — |
|
|
| ||
Outstanding at December 31, 2018 ($17.31) |
| 800,000 |
| $ | 17.31 |
| $ | 1,824 |
|
Options exercisable at December 31, 2018 |
| 800,000 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Available for grant at December 31, 2018 |
| 1,580,869 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
There were no stock options exercised under allany stock option plans for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013.2016. The Company has a policy of issuing new shares to satisfy stock option exercises.
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the stock options outstanding had a weighted average remaining contractual life of approximately 6.4 years and 7.4 years, respectively.
The Company recognized stock options expense of $432,000, $4,000$193,000, $464,000 and zero$1,407,000 for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013,2016, respectively.
RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS
The Company has issued stock awards (“Restricted Stock Awards”) to officers, certain other employees and non-employee members of the Board of Directors of the Company,General Partner, which allow the holders to each receive a certain amount of shares of the Company’sGeneral Partner’s common stock generally over a one to seven-year vesting period, of which 98,66967,289 unvested shares were legally outstanding at December 31, 2015. Of2018. Vesting of the Restricted Stock Awards issued to executive officers and certain other employees 210,000 were contingent upon the Company meeting certain performance goals to be set by the Committee each year (“Performance Shares”), with the remainingis based on time and service.
On June 5, 2015, in connection with the Executive Employment Agreements, the Company granted a total of 37,550.54 Restricted Stock Awards, which were valued in accordance with ASC 718 –— Stock Compensation, at their fair value. These awards are scheduled to vestvested equally over a three-year period on each annual anniversary date of the grant date.
All currently outstanding and unvested Restricted Stock Awards provided to the officers, certain other employees, and members of the Board of Directors of the CompanyGeneral Partner were issued under the 2013 Plan.
| Weighted-Average | ||||
| Grant – Date | ||||
| Shares | Fair Value | |||
| Outstanding at January 1, 2013 | 134,328 | $ | 31.65 | |
| Granted (a) (b) | 168,841 | 23.99 | ||
| Vested | (149,463) | 29.63 | ||
| Forfeited | (146) | 26.36 | ||
| Outstanding at December 31, 2013 | 153,560 | $ | 25.20 | |
| Granted (c) (d) (e) | 376,719 | 20.04 | ||
| Vested | (183,214) | 22.37 | ||
| Forfeited | (119) | 26.36 | ||
| Outstanding at December 31, 2014 | 346,946 | $ | 21.09 | |
| Granted (f) | 41,337 | 17.51 | ||
| Vested | (250,132) | 21.44 | ||
| Forfeited | (1,931) | 20.31 | ||
| Outstanding at December 31, 2015 | 136,220 | $ | 19.36 |
|
|
|
| Weighted-Average |
| |
|
|
|
| Grant – Date |
| |
|
| Shares |
| Fair Value |
| |
Outstanding at January 1, 2016 |
| 136,220 |
| $ | 19.36 |
|
Granted |
| 74,622 |
| 23.79 |
| |
Vested |
| (61,654 | ) | 18.94 |
| |
Forfeited |
| (3,910 | ) | 21.58 |
| |
Outstanding at December 31, 2016 |
| 145,278 |
| $ | 21.76 |
|
Granted |
| 59,985 |
| 27.00 |
| |
Vested |
| (95,009 | ) | 20.73 |
| |
Forfeited |
| (1,936 | ) | 25.83 |
| |
Outstanding at December 31, 2017 |
| 108,318 |
| $ | 25.49 |
|
Granted |
| 40,185 |
| 20.16 |
| |
Vested |
| (72,502 | ) | 25.33 |
| |
Forfeited |
| (8,712 | ) | 25.83 |
| |
Outstanding at December 31, 2018 |
| 67,289 |
| $ | 22.43 |
|
As of December 31, 2015,2018, the Company had $2.0$0.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested Restricted Stock Awards granted under the Company’s stock compensation plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.80.5 years.
PERFORMANCE SHARE UNITS/TSR-BASED AWARDS
On June 5, 2015, in connection with the Executive Employment Agreements, the Company granted a total of 112,651.64 performance share units (“PSUs”) which willwas to vest from 0 to 150 percent of the number of PSUs granted based on the Company’s total shareholder return relative to a peer group of equity office REITs over a three-year performance period starting from the grant date, each PSU evidencing the right to receive a share of the Company’sGeneral Partner’s common stock upon vesting. The PSUs arewere also entitled to the payment of dividend equivalents in respect of vested PSUs in the form of additional PSUs. The PSUs were valued in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation, at their fair value on the grant date, utilizing a Monte-Carlo simulation to estimate the probability of the vesting conditions being satisfied.
The PSUs vested at 100 percent on June 5, 2018 based on the calculation of the achievement of the Company’s total shareholder return, for which shares of the General Partner’s common stock were issued under the 2013 Plan.
As of December 31, 2018, the Company had no unrecognized compensation cost as there are no unvested PSUs outstanding under the Company’s stock compensation plans.
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS
On March 8, 2016, the Company granted Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) awards to senior management of the Company, including the General Partner’s executive officers (the “2016 LTIP Awards”). All of the 2016 LTIP Awards were in the form of units in the Operating Partnership (“LTIP Units”) and constitute awards under the 2013 Plan. For Messrs. Rudin, DeMarco and Tycher, approximately 25 percent of the target 2016 LTIP Award was in the form of a time-based award that vests after three years on March 8, 2019 (the “2016 TBV LTIP Units”), and the remaining approximately 75 percent of the target 2016 LTIP Award was in the form of a performance-based award under a new Outperformance Plan (the “2016 OPP”) adopted by the General Partner’s Board of Directors consisting of a multi-year, performance-based equity compensation plan and related forms of award agreement (the “2016 PBV LTIP Units”). For all other executive officers, approximately 40 percent of the target 2016 LTIP Award was in the form of 2016 TBV LTIP Units and the remaining approximately 60 percent of the target 2016 LTIP Award was in the form of 2016 PBV LTIP Units.
The 2016 OPP was designed to align the interests of senior management to relative and absolute performance of the Company over a three-year performance period from March 8, 2016 through March 7, 2019. Participants in the 2016 OPP will only earn the full awards if, over the three-year performance period, the Company achieves a 50 percent absolute total stockholder return (“TSR”) and if the Company is in the 75th percentile of performance versus the NAREIT Office Index.
On April 4, 2017, the Company granted LTIP awards to senior management of the Company, including the General Partner’s executive officers (the “2017 LTIP Awards”). All of the 2017 LTIP Awards were in the form of LTIP Units and constitute awards under the 2013 Plan. For Messrs. DeMarco, Tycher and Rudin, approximately twenty-five percent (25%) of the 2017 LTIP Award was in the form of a time-based award that vests after three years on April 4, 2020 (the “2017 TBV LTIP Units”), and the remaining approximately seventy-five percent (75%) of the 2017 LTIP Award was in the form of a performance-based award under the Company’s Outperformance Plan
(the “2017 OPP”) adopted by the General Partner’s Board of Directors, consisting of a multi-year, performance-based equity compensation plan and related forms of award agreement (the “2017 PBV LTIP Units”). For all other executive officers, approximately forty percent (40%) of the 2017 LTIP Award was in the form of 2017 TBV LTIP Units and the remaining approximately sixty percent (60%) of the 2017 LTIP Award was in the form of 2017 PBV LTIP Units.
The 2017 OPP was designed to align the interests of senior management to relative and absolute performance of the Company over a three-year performance period from April 4, 2017 through April 3, 2020. Participants in the 2017 OPP will only earn the full awards if, over the three-year performance period, the Company achieves a thirty-six percent (36%) absolute TSR and if the Company is in the 75th percentile of performance as compared to the NAREIT office index.
On April 20, 2018, the Company granted LTIP awards to senior management of the Company, including the General Partner’s executive officers (the “2018 LTIP Awards”). All of the 2018 LTIP Awards were in the form of LTIP Units and constitute awards under the 2013 Plan. For Messrs. DeMarco and Tycher, approximately twenty-five percent (25%) of the grant date fair value of the 2018 LTIP Award was in the form of a time-based award that vests after three years on April 20, 2021 (the “2018 TBV LTIP Units”), and the remaining approximately seventy-five percent (75%) of the grant date fair value of the 2018 LTIP Award was in the form of a performance-based award under the Company’s Outperformance Plan (the “2018 OPP”) adopted by the General Partner’s Board of Directors, consisting of a multi-year, performance-based equity compensation plan and related forms of award agreement (the “2018 PBV LTIP Units”). For all other executive officers, approximately fifty percent (50%) of the grant date fair value of the 2018 LTIP Award was in the form of 2018 TBV LTIP Units and the remaining approximately fifty percent (50%) of the grant date fair value of the 2018 LTIP Award was in the form of 2018 PBV LTIP Units.
The 2018 OPP was designed to align the interests of senior management to relative and absolute performance of the Company over a three-year performance period from April 20, 2018 through April 19, 2021. Participants in the 2018 OPP will only earn the full awards if, over the three-year performance period, the Company achieves a thirty-six percent (36%) absolute TSR and if the Company’s TSR is in the 75th percentile of performance as compared to the office REITs in the NAREIT index.
LTIP Units will remain subject to forfeiture depending on the extent that the 2016 LTIP Awards, 2017 LTIP Awards and 2018 LTIP Awards vest. The number of LTIP Units to be issued initially to recipients of the 2016 PBV LTIP Awards, 2017 PBV LTIP Awards and 2018 PBV LTIP Awards is the maximum number of LTIP Units that may be earned under the awards. The number of LTIP Units that actually vest for each award recipient will be determined at the end of the performance measurement period. TSR for the Company and for the Index over the three-year measurement period and other circumstances will determine how many LTIP Units vest for each recipient; if they are fewer than the number issued initially, the balance will be forfeited as of the performance measurement date.
Prior to vesting, recipients of LTIP Units will be entitled to receive per unit distributions equal to one-tenth (10 percent) of the regular quarterly distributions payable on a common unit of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership (a “common unit”), but will not be entitled to receive any special distributions. Distributions with respect to the other nine-tenths (90 percent) of regular quarterly distributions payable on a common unit will accrue but shall only become payable upon vesting of the LTIP Unit. After vesting of the 2016 TBV LTIP Units, 2017 TBV LTIP Units and 2018 LTIP TBV Units or the end of the measurement period for the 2016 PBV LTIP Units, 2017 PBV LTIP Units and 2018 LTIP PBV Units, the number of LTIP Units, both vested and unvested, will be entitled to receive distributions in an amount per unit equal to distributions, both regular and special, payable on a common unit.
As a result of certain executive management and other personnel changes during the year ended December 31, 2018, the former employees forfeited and cancelled 189,273 2016 LTIP Awards, 105,443 2017 LTIP Awards and 38,015 2018 LTIP Awards, and the Company accelerated the vesting of 22,215 2016 LTIP Awards and 32,849 2017 LTIP Awards. As of December 31, 2018, a total of 332,302 2016 PBV LTIP Units, 108,764 2016 TBV LTIP Units, 370,509 2017 PBV LTIP Units, 69,522 2017 TBV LTIP Units, 629,252 2018 PBV LTIP Units and 196,757 2018 TBV LTIP Units, net of LTIP Units forfeited and cancelled resulting from executive management and other personnel changes, were outstanding. The LTIP Units were valued in accordance with ASC 718 — Stock Compensation, at their fair value. The Company has reserved shares of common stock under the 2004 Plan and 2013 Plan for issuance upon vesting and conversion of the TSR Performance Shares and PSUsLTIP Units in accordance with thetheir terms and conditionsconditions.
As of December 31, 2018, the TSR-Based Awards and PSUs.
DEFERRED STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN FOR DIRECTORS
The Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, which commenced January 1, 1999, allows non-employee directors of the Company to elect to defer up to 100 percent of their annual retainer fee into deferred stock units. The deferred stock units are convertible into an equal number of shares of common stock upon the directors’ termination of service from the Board of
Directors or a change in control of the Company, as defined in the plan. Deferred stock units are credited to each director quarterly using the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the applicable dividend record date for the respective quarter. Each participating director’s account is also credited for an equivalent amount of deferred stock units based on the dividend rate for each quarter.
During the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013, 19,702, 20,2612016, 26,620, 19,728 and 22,39214,274 deferred stock units were earned, respectively. As of December 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, there were 178,039236,383 and 157,730210,738 deferred stock units outstanding, respectively.
EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic EPS or EPU excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders or unitholders by the weighted average number of shares or units outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS or EPU reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.
The following information presents the Company’s results for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016 in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings Per Share: Share (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):
Mack-Cali Realty Corporation:
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||
| Computation of Basic EPS | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||
| Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | (142,052) | $ | 31,391 | $ | (89,686) | |
| Add: Noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures | 1,044 | 778 | 2,199 | ||||
| Add: Noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership | 15,256 | (3,602) | 10,459 | ||||
| Income (loss) from continuing operations available to common shareholders | (125,752) | 28,567 | (77,028) | ||||
| Income from discontinued operations available to common shareholders | - | - | 62,119 | ||||
| Net income (loss) available to common shareholders | $ | (125,752) | $ | 28,567 | $ | (14,909) | |
| Weighted average common shares | 89,291 | 88,727 | 87,762 | ||||
Basic EPS: | |||||||
| Income (loss) from continuing operations available to common shareholders | $ | (1.41) | $ | 0.32 | $ | (0.88) | |
| Income from discontinued operations available to common shareholders | - | - | 0.71 | ||||
| Net income (loss) available to common shareholders | $ | (1.41) | $ | 0.32 | $ | (0.17) | |
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||
| Computation of Diluted EPS | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||
| Income (loss) from continuing operations available to common shareholders | $ | (125,752) | $ | 28,567 | $ | (77,028) | |
| Add (deduct): Noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership | (15,256) | 3,602 | (10,459) | ||||
| Income (loss) from continuing operations for diluted earnings per share | (141,008) | 32,169 | (87,487) | ||||
| Income from discontinued operations for diluted earnings per share | - | - | 70,628 | ||||
| Net income (loss) for diluted earnings per share | $ | (141,008) | $ | 32,169 | $ | (16,859) | |
| Weighted average common shares | 100,222 | 100,041 | 99,785 | ||||
Diluted EPS: | |||||||
| Income (loss) from continuing operations available to common shareholders | $ | (1.41) | $ | 0.32 | $ | (0.88) | |
| Income from discontinued operations available to common shareholders | - | - | 0.71 | ||||
| Net income (loss) available to common shareholders | $ | (1.41) | $ | 0.32 | $ | (0.17) | |
|
| Year Ended December 31, |
| |||||||
Computation of Basic EPS |
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
| |||
Net income |
| $ | 106,401 |
| $ | 33,718 |
| $ | 130,294 |
|
Add: Noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures |
| 1,216 |
| 1,018 |
| 651 |
| |||
Add (deduct): Noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership |
| (9,527 | ) | (2,711 | ) | (13,721 | ) | |||
Deduct: Redeemable noncontrolling interest |
| (13,979 | ) | (8,840 | ) | — |
| |||
Deduct: Redemption value adjustment of redeemable noncontrolling interests attributable to common shareholders |
| (11,425 | ) | (17,951 | ) | — |
| |||
Net income available to common shareholders for basic earnings per share |
| $ | 72,686 |
| $ | 5,234 |
| $ | 117,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Weighted average common shares |
| 90,388 |
| 90,005 |
| 89,746 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Basic EPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net income available to common shareholders |
| $ | 0.80 |
| $ | 0.06 |
| $ | 1.31 |
|
|
| Year Ended December 31, |
| |||||||
Computation of Diluted EPS |
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
| |||
Net income available to common shareholders for basic earnings per share |
| $ | 72,686 |
| $ | 5,234 |
| $ | 117,224 |
|
Add (deduct): Noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership |
| 9,527 |
| 2,711 |
| 13,721 |
| |||
Deduct: Redemption value adjustment of redeemable noncontrolling interests attributable to the Operating Partnership unitholders |
| (1,296 | ) | (2,074 | ) | — |
| |||
Net income available for diluted earnings per share |
| $ | 80,917 |
| $ | 5,871 |
| $ | 130,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Weighted average common shares |
| 100,724 |
| 100,703 |
| 100,498 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Diluted EPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net income available to common shareholders |
| $ | 0.80 |
| $ | 0.06 |
| $ | 1.30 |
|
The following schedule reconciles the weighted average shares used in the basic EPS calculation to the shares used in the diluted EPS calculation:
| Year Ended December 31, | |||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
| Basic EPS shares | 89,291 | 88,727 | 87,762 |
| Add: Operating Partnership – common units | 10,931 | 11,272 | 12,023 |
| Restricted Stock Awards | - | 42 | - |
| Diluted EPS Shares | 100,222 | 100,041 | 99,785 |
|
| Year Ended December 31, |
| ||||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
|
Basic EPS shares |
| 90,388 |
| 90,005 |
| 89,746 |
|
Add: Operating Partnership — common and vested LTIP units |
| 10,246 |
| 10,405 |
| 10,499 |
|
Restricted Stock Awards |
| — |
| 40 |
| 43 |
|
Stock Options |
| 90 |
| 253 |
| 210 |
|
Diluted EPS Shares |
| 100,724 |
| 100,703 |
| 100,498 |
|
Contingently issuable shares under the PSU awards and Price Vesting OptionsAwards were excluded from the denominator in 20152017 and 2016 because the criteria had not been met for the period.periods. Contingently issuable shares under the TSR Performance SharesRestricted Stock Awards were excluded from the denominator in 2013 because the criteria had not been met for2018 as
such securities were anti-dilutive during the period. NotAlso not included in the computations of diluted EPS were 405,000, 10,000 and 15,000 stock optionsthe unvested LTIP Units as such securities were anti-dilutive during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.all periods presented. Unvested restricted stock outstanding as of December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016 were 98,669, 136,94667,289, 95,801 and 409,294120,245 shares, respectively.
Dividends declared per common share for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016 was $0.60,$0.80, $0.75 and $1.35$0.60 per share, respectively.
Mack-Cali Realty, L.P.:
|
| Year Ended December 31, |
| |||||||
Computation of Basic EPU |
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
| |||
Net income |
| $ | 106,401 |
| $ | 33,718 |
| $ | 130,294 |
|
Add: Noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures |
| 1,216 |
| 1,018 |
| 651 |
| |||
Deduct: Redeemable noncontrolling interest |
| (13,979 | ) | (8,840 | ) | — |
| |||
Deduct: Redemption value adjustment of redeemable noncontrolling interests |
| (12,721 | ) | (20,025 | ) | — |
| |||
Net income available to common unitholders for basic earnings per unit |
| $ | 80,917 |
| $ | 5,871 |
| $ | 130,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Weighted average common units |
| 100,634 |
| 100,410 |
| 100,245 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Basic EPU: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net income available to common unitholders for basic earnings per unit |
| $ | 0.80 |
| $ | 0.06 |
| $ | 1.31 |
|
|
| Year Ended December 31, |
| |||||||
Computation of Diluted EPU |
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
| |||
Net income available to common unitholders for diluted earnings per unit |
| $ | 80,917 |
| $ | 5,871 |
| $ | 130,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Weighted average common unit |
| 100,724 |
| 100,703 |
| 100,498 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Diluted EPU: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net income available to common unitholders |
| $ | 0.80 |
| $ | 0.06 |
| $ | 1.30 |
|
The following schedule reconciles the weighted average units used in the basic EPU calculation to the units used in the diluted EPU calculation (in thousands):
|
| Year Ended December 31, |
| ||||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
|
Basic EPU units |
| 100,634 |
| 100,410 |
| 100,245 |
|
Add: Restricted Stock Awards |
| — |
| 40 |
| 43 |
|
Stock Options |
| 90 |
| 253 |
| 210 |
|
Diluted EPU Units |
| 100,724 |
| 100,703 |
| 100,498 |
|
Contingently issuable shares under the PSU Awards were excluded from the denominator in 2017 and 2016 because the criteria had not been met for the periods. Contingently issuable shares under Restricted Stock Awards were excluded from the denominator in 2018 as such securities were anti-dilutive during the period. Also not included in the computations of diluted EPU were the unvested LTIP Units as such securities were anti-dilutive during all periods presented. Unvested restricted stock outstanding as of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were 67,289, 95,801 and 120,245 shares, respectively.
Distributions declared per common unit for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $0.80, $0.75 and $0.60 per unit, respectively.
16. NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS IN SUBSIDIARIES
Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries in the accompanying consolidated financial statements relate to (i) common units and LTIP units in the Operating Partnership, held by parties other than the Company,General Partner (“Limited Partners”), and (ii) interests in consolidated joint ventures for the portion of such ventures not owned by the Company.
Pursuant to ASC 810, Consolidation, on the accounting and reporting for noncontrolling interests and changes in ownership interests of a subsidiary, changes in a parent’s ownership interest (and transactions with noncontrolling interest unitholders in the subsidiary) while the parent retains its controlling interest in its subsidiary should be accounted for as equity transactions. The carrying value of the
noncontrolling interest shall be adjusted to reflect the change in its ownership interest in the subsidiary, with the offset to equity attributable to the parent. Accordingly, as a result of equity transactions which caused changes in ownership percentages between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation stockholders’ equity and noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company has decreased noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership and increased additional paid-in capital in Mack-Cali Realty Corporation stockholders’ equity by approximately $2.2 million as of December 31, 2018.
NONCONTROLLING INTEREST IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIP
Common Units
Certain individuals and entities own common units in the Operating Partnership. A common unit and a share of Common Stock of the CompanyGeneral Partner have substantially the same economic characteristics in as much as they effectively share equally in the net income or loss of the Operating Partnership. Common unitholders have the right to redeem their common units, subject to certain restrictions. The redemption is required to be satisfied in shares of Common Stock, cash, or a combination thereof, calculated as follows: one share of the Company’sGeneral Partner’s Common Stock, or cash equal to the fair market value of a share of the Company’sGeneral Partner’s Common Stock at the time of redemption, for each common unit. The Company,General Partner, in its sole discretion, determines the form of redemption of common units (i.e., whether a common unitholder receives Common Stock, cash, or any combination thereof). If the CompanyGeneral Partner elects to satisfy the redemption with shares of Common Stock as opposed to cash, it is obligated to issue shares of its Common Stock to the redeeming unitholder. Regardless of the rights described above, the common unitholders may not put their units for cash to the CompanyGeneral Partner or the Operating Partnership under any circumstances. When a unitholder redeems a common unit, noncontrolling interest in the Operating Partnership is reduced and Mack-Cali Realty Corporation Stockholders’ equity is increased.
LTIP Units
On March 8, 2016, the Company granted 2016 LTIP Awards to senior management of the Company, including the General Partner’s executive officers. On April 4, 2017, the Company granted 2017 LTIP Awards to senior management of the Company, including the General Partner’s executive officers. On April 20, 2018, the Company granted 2018 LTIP Awards to senior management of the Company, including the General Partner’s executive officers. All of the 2016 LTIP Awards, 2017 LTIP Awards and 2018 LTIP Awards are in the form of units in the Operating Partnership. See Note 15: Mack-Cali Realty Corporation Stockholders’ Equity and Mack-Cali Realty, L.P.’s Partners’ Capital — Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards.
LTIP Units are designed to qualify as “profits interests” in the Operating Partnership for federal income tax purposes. As a general matter, the profits interests characteristics of the LTIP Units mean that initially they will not be economically equivalent in value to a common unit. If and when events specified by applicable tax regulations occur, LTIP Units can over time increase in value up to the point where they are equivalent to common units on a one-for-one basis. After LTIP Units are fully vested, and to the extent the special tax rules applicable to profits interests have allowed them to become equivalent in value to common units, LTIP Units may be converted on a one-for-one basis into common units. Common units in turn have a one-for-one relationship in value with shares of the General Partner’s common stock, and are redeemable on a one-for-one basis for cash or, at the election of the Company, shares of the General Partner’s common stock.
Unit Transactions
The following table sets forth the changes in noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries which relate to the common units and LTIP units in the Operating Partnership for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013:
|
| Common |
| LTIP |
|
|
| Units |
| Units |
|
Balance at January 1, 2016 |
| 10,516,844 |
| — |
|
Redemption of common units for shares of common stock |
| (28,739 | ) | — |
|
Issuance of units |
| — |
| 657,373 |
|
Balance at December 31, 2016 |
| 10,488,105 |
| 657,373 |
|
Redemption of common units for shares of common stock |
| (148,662 | ) | — |
|
Issuance of units |
| 99,412 |
| 578,323 |
|
Cancellation of units |
| — |
| (4,819 | ) |
Balance at December 31, 2017 |
| 10,438,855 |
| 1,230,877 |
|
Redemption of common units for shares of common stock |
| (264,570 | ) | — |
|
Issuance of units |
| — |
| 864,024 |
|
Cancellation of units |
| — |
| (332,731 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2018 |
| 10,174,285 |
| 1,762,170 |
|
Noncontrolling Interest Ownership
As of December 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, the noncontrolling interest common unitholders owned 10.510.2 percent and 11.110.4 percent of the Operating Partnership, respectively.
NONCONTROLLING INTEREST IN CONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES
The Company consolidates certain joint ventures in which it has ownership interests. Various entities and/or individuals hold noncontrolling interests in these ventures.
PARTICIPATION RIGHTS
The Company’s interests in certain real estate projects (three(two properties and a future development) each provide for the initial distributions of net cash flow solely to the Company, and thereafter, other parties have participation rights in 50 percent of the excess net cash flow remaining after the distribution to the Company of the aggregate amount equal to the sum of: (a) the Company’s capital contributions, plus (b) an IRR of 10 percent per annum.
17. SEGMENT REPORTING
The Company operates in threetwo business segments: (i) commercial and other real estate and (ii) multi-family real estate and (iii) multi-family services. The Company provides leasing, property management, acquisition, development, construction and tenant-related services for its commercial and other real estate and multi-family real estate portfolio. The Company’s multi-family services business also provides similar services for third parties. The Company no longer considers construction services as a reportable segment as it phased out this line of business in 2014. The Company had no revenues from foreign countries recorded for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013.2016. The Company had no long lived assets in foreign locations as of December 31, 20152018 and 2014.2017. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 2: Significant Accounting Policies, excluding depreciation and amortization.
The Company evaluates performance based upon net operating income from the combined properties and operations in each of its real estate segments (commercial and other real estate, and multi-family)multi-family real estate and from its multi-family services segment.
Selected results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013,2016, and selected asset information as of December 31, 20152018 and 20142017 regarding the Company’s operating segments are as follows. Amounts for prior periods have been restated to conform to the current period segment reporting presentation: presentation (dollars in thousands):
| Real Estate | |||||||||||||||
| Commercial | Multi-family | Corporate | Total | ||||||||||||
| & Other | Multi-family | Services | & Other (d) | Company | |||||||||||
| Total revenues: | |||||||||||||||
| 2015 | $ | 538,323 | $ | 27,787 | $ | 33,112 | (e) | $ | (4,339) | $ | 594,883 | ||||
| 2014 | 585,491 | 24,971 | 30,533 | (f) | (4,196) | 636,799 | |||||||||
| 2013 | 621,352 | 12,792 | 25,710 | (g) | 7,177 | 667,031 | |||||||||
| Total operating and | |||||||||||||||
| interest expenses (a): | |||||||||||||||
| 2015 | $ | 264,967 | $ | 17,642 | $ | 37,090 | (h) | $ | 105,452 | $ | 425,151 | ||||
| 2014 | 295,416 | 12,235 | 38,377 | (i) | 138,733 | 484,761 | |||||||||
| 2013 | 285,755 | 6,482 | 32,415 | (j) | 135,963 | 460,615 | |||||||||
| Equity in earnings (loss) of | |||||||||||||||
| unconsolidated joint ventures: | |||||||||||||||
| 2015 | $ | 5,104 | $ | (9,879) | $ | 1,603 | $ | - | $ | (3,172) | |||||
| 2014 | 4,236 | (8,790) | 2,131 | - | (2,423) | ||||||||||
| 2013 | 6,280 | (10,615) | 2,008 | - | (2,327) | ||||||||||
| Net operating income (loss) (b): | |||||||||||||||
| 2015 | $ | 278,460 | $ | 266 | $ | (2,375) | $ | (109,791) | $ | 166,560 | |||||
| 2014 | 294,311 | 3,946 | (5,713) | (142,929) | 149,615 | ||||||||||
| 2013 | 341,877 | (4,305) | (4,697) | (128,786) | 204,089 | ||||||||||
| Total assets: | |||||||||||||||
| 2015 | $ | 3,167,408 | $ | 838,874 | $ | 9,831 | $ | 47,377 | $ | 4,063,490 | |||||
| 2014 | 3,636,126 | 492,362 | 11,158 | 52,601 | 4,192,247 | ||||||||||
| Total long-lived assets (c): | |||||||||||||||
| 2015 | $ | 2,886,583 | $ | 577,705 | $ | 3,670 | $ | (1,531) | $ | 3,466,427 | |||||
| 2014 | 3,344,840 | 318,524 | 3,858 | 3,482 | 3,670,704 | ||||||||||
| Total investments in | |||||||||||||||
| unconsolidated joint ventures: | |||||||||||||||
| 2015 | $ | 76,140 | $ | 225,850 | $ | 1,467 | $ | - | $ | 303,457 | |||||
| 2014 | 81,649 | 164,912 | 907 | - | 247,468 | ||||||||||
|
| Commercial |
| Multi-family |
| Corporate |
| Total |
| ||||
|
| & Other Real Estate |
| Real Estate & Services (d) |
| & Other (e) |
| Company |
| ||||
Total revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
2018 |
| $ | 416,369 |
| $ | 113,805 |
| $ | 432 |
| $ | 530,606 |
|
2017 |
| 522,223 |
| 90,654 |
| 3,323 |
| 616,200 |
| ||||
2016 |
| 541,271 |
| 69,873 |
| 2,254 |
| 613,398 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total operating and interest expenses (a): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
2018 |
| $ | 183,439 |
| $ | 70,280 |
| $ | 104,788 |
| $ | 358,507 |
|
2017 |
| 238,055 |
| 63,589 |
| 94,662 |
| 396,306 |
| ||||
2016 |
| 263,663 |
| 60,646 |
| 91,042 |
| 415,351 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
2018 |
| $ | 2,319 |
| $ | (2,446 | ) | $ | — |
| $ | (127 | ) |
2017 |
| 1,644 |
| (7,725 | ) | — |
| (6,081 | ) | ||||
2016 |
| 23,796 |
| (5,008 | ) | — |
| 18,788 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| — |
| ||||
Net operating income (loss) (b): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
2018 |
| $ | 235,249 |
| $ | 41,079 |
| $ | (104,356 | ) | $ | 171,972 |
|
2017 |
| 285,812 |
| 19,340 |
| (91,339 | ) | 213,813 |
| ||||
2016 |
| 301,404 |
| 4,219 |
| (88,788 | ) | 216,835 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
2018 |
| $ | 2,687,178 |
| $ | 2,260,497 |
| $ | 112,969 |
| $ | 5,060,644 |
|
2017 |
| 2,915,646 |
| 1,937,708 |
| 104,531 |
| 4,957,885 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total long-lived assets (c): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
2018 |
| $ | 2,413,696 |
| $ | 1,973,826 |
| $ | 33,157 |
| $ | 4,420,679 |
|
2017 |
| 2,613,815 |
| 1,645,410 |
| 31,901 |
| 4,291,126 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total investments in unconsolidated joint ventures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
2018 |
| $ | 13,699 |
| $ | 218,771 |
| $ | 280 |
| $ | 232,750 |
|
2017 |
| 15,143 |
| 237,321 |
| 162 |
| 252,626 |
| ||||
(a) Total operating and interest expenses represent the sum of: real estate taxes; utilities; operating services; real estate services expenses; general and administrative, acquisition-related costs and interest expense (net of interest income). All interest expense, net of interest and other investment income, (including for property-level mortgages) is excluded from segment amounts and classified in Corporate & Other for all periods.
(b) Net operating income represents total revenues less total operating and interest expenses (as defined and classified in Note “a”), plus equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures, for the period.
(c) Long-lived assets are comprised of net investment in rental property, unbilled rents receivable and goodwill.
(d) Segment assets and operations were owned through a consolidated variable interest entity commencing in February 2018.
(e) Corporate & Other represents all corporate-level items (including interest and other investment income, interest expense, non-property general and administrative expense) as well as intercompany eliminations necessary to reconcile to consolidated Company totals.
Mack-Cali Realty Corporation
The following schedule reconciles net operating income to net income available to common shareholders: shareholders (dollars in thousands):
|
| Year Ended December 31, |
| |||||||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
| |||
Net operating income |
| $ | 171,972 |
| $ | 213,813 |
| $ | 216,835 |
|
Add (deduct): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Depreciation and amortization |
| (174,847 | ) | (205,169 | ) | (186,684 | ) | |||
Land Impairments |
| (24,566 | ) | — |
| — |
| |||
Gain on change of control of interests |
| 14,217 |
| — |
| 15,347 |
| |||
Realized gains (losses) and unrealized losses on disposition of rental property, net |
| 99,436 |
| 2,364 |
| 109,666 |
| |||
Gain on disposition of developable land |
| 30,939 |
| — |
| — |
| |||
Gain on sale of investment in unconsolidated joint venture |
| — |
| 23,131 |
| 5,670 |
| |||
Loss from extinguishment of debt, net |
| (10,750 | ) | (421 | ) | (30,540 | ) | |||
Net income |
| 106,401 |
| 33,718 |
| 130,294 |
| |||
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures |
| 1,216 |
| 1,018 |
| 651 |
| |||
Noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership |
| (9,527 | ) | (2,711 | ) | (13,721 | ) | |||
Redeemable noncontrolling interest |
| (13,979 | ) | (8,840 | ) | — |
| |||
Net income available to common shareholders |
| $ | 84,111 |
| $ | 23,185 |
| $ | 117,224 |
|
Mack-Cali Realty, L.P.
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||
| Net operating income | $ | 166,560 | $ | 149,615 | $ | 204,089 | ||
| Add (deduct): | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | (170,402) | (172,490) | (182,766) | |||||
| Realized gains on disposition of | ||||||||
| rental property, net | 53,261 | 54,848 | - | |||||
| Gain on sale of investment in unconsolidated joint venture | 6,448 | - | - | |||||
| Loss from early extinguishment of debt | - | (582) | (156) | |||||
| Impairments | (197,919) | - | (110,853) | |||||
| Income (loss) from continuing operations | (142,052) | 31,391 | (89,686) | |||||
| Discontinued operations | ||||||||
| Income from discontinued operations | - | - | 11,811 | |||||
| Loss from early extinguishment of debt | - | - | (703) | |||||
| Realized gains (losses) and unrealized losses on | ||||||||
| disposition of rental property and impairments, net | - | - | 59,520 | |||||
| Total discontinued operations, net | - | - | 70,628 | |||||
| Net income (loss) | (142,052) | 31,391 | (19,058) | |||||
| Noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures | 1,044 | 778 | 2,199 | |||||
| Noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership | 15,256 | (3,602) | 10,459 | |||||
| Noncontrolling interest in discontinued operations | - | - | (8,509) | |||||
| Net income (loss) available to common shareholders | $ | (125,752) | $ | 28,567 | $ | (14,909) | ||
The following schedule reconciles net operating income to net income available to common unitholders (dollars in thousands):
|
| Year Ended December 31, |
| |||||||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
| |||
Net operating income |
| $ | 171,972 |
| $ | 213,813 |
| $ | 216,835 |
|
Add (deduct): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Depreciation and amortization |
| (174,847 | ) | (205,169 | ) | (186,684 | ) | |||
Land Impairments |
| (24,566 | ) | — |
| — |
| |||
Gain on change of control of interests |
| 14,217 |
| — |
| 15,347 |
| |||
Realized gains (losses) and unrealized losses on disposition of rental property, net |
| 99,436 |
| 2,364 |
| 109,666 |
| |||
Gain on disposition of developable land |
| 30,939 |
| — |
| — |
| |||
Gain on sale of investment in unconsolidated joint venture |
| — |
| 23,131 |
| 5,670 |
| |||
Loss from extinguishment of debt, net |
| (10,750 | ) | (421 | ) | (30,540 | ) | |||
Net income |
| 106,401 |
| 33,718 |
| 130,294 |
| |||
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures |
| 1,216 |
| 1,018 |
| 651 |
| |||
Redeemable noncontrolling interest |
| (13,979 | ) | (8,840 | ) |
|
| |||
Net income available to common unitholders |
| $ | 93,638 |
| $ | 25,896 |
| $ | 130,945 |
|
18. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
William L. Mack, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company,General Partner, David S. Mack, a director of the Company,General Partner, and Earle I. Mack, a former director of the Company,General Partner, are the executive officers, directors and stockholders of a corporation that leases approximately 7,034 square feet at one of the Company’s office properties (the Company disposed of this property in January 2019), which is scheduled to expire in May 2018, subject to two, three-year renewal options.September 2019. The Company has recognized $204,000, $231,000$193,000, $187,000 and $226,000$193,000 in revenue under this lease for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013,2016, respectively, and had no accounts receivable from the corporation as of December 31, 20152018 and 2014.
The adult children of Marshall Tycher, Chairman of RRT, own minority equity interests in a vendor to the Company. Additionally, Mr. Tycher’s son-in-law is an employee of the vendor. The Company recognized $148,000 in expense for this vendor during the year ended December 31, 2018 and had no accounts payable to this vendor as of December 31, 2018.
Certain executive officers of the Company’s Roseland subsidiaryRRT and/or their family members (“RG”) directly or indirectly hold small noncontrolling interests in a certain consolidated joint venture. Additionally, the Company earned $2,542,000, $2,401,000$1,114,000, $1,873,000, and $2,272,000$2,464,000 from entities in which RG has ownership interests for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013,2016, respectively.
19. CONDENSED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (unaudited)
(unaudited)Mack-Cali Realty Corporation
The following summarizes the condensed quarterly financial information for the Company:Company (dollars in thousands):
Quarter Ended 2018 |
| December 31 |
| September 30 |
| June 30 |
| March 31 |
| ||||
Total revenues |
| $ | 132,936 |
| $ | 132,114 |
| $ | 126,589 |
| $ | 138,967 |
|
Net income |
| $ | 52,523 |
| $ | 1,689 |
| $ | 1,501 |
| $ | 50,688 |
|
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders |
| $ | 43,804 |
| $ | (1,478 | ) | $ | (1,251 | ) | $ | 43,036 |
|
|
|
|
| ` |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders |
| $ | 0.45 |
| $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | 0.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Diluted earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders |
| $ | 0.45 |
| $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | 0.45 |
|
Quarter Ended 2017 |
| December 31 |
| September 30 |
| June 30 |
| March 31 |
| ||||
Total revenues |
| $ | 143,529 |
| $ | 160,018 |
| $ | 162,766 |
| $ | 149,887 |
|
Net income (loss) |
| $ | 5,411 |
| $ | 44,703 |
| $ | (39,125 | ) | $ | 22,729 |
|
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders |
| $ | 2,582 |
| $ | 38,054 |
| $ | (37,330 | ) | $ | 19,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders |
| $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.39 |
| $ | (0.44 | ) | $ | 0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Diluted earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders |
| $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.39 |
| $ | (0.44 | ) | $ | 0.11 |
|
Mack-Cali Realty, L.P.
The following summarizes the condensed quarterly financial information for the Company (dollars in thousands):
Quarter Ended 2018 |
| December 31 |
| September 30 |
| June 30 |
| March 31 |
| ||||
Total revenues |
| $ | 132,936 |
| $ | 132,114 |
| $ | 126,589 |
| $ | 138,967 |
|
Net income |
| $ | 52,523 |
| $ | 1,689 |
| $ | 1,501 |
| $ | 50,688 |
|
Net income (loss) available to common unitholders |
| $ | 48,757 |
| $ | (1,645 | ) | $ | (1,393 | ) | $ | 47,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic earnings per common unit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income (loss) available to common unitholders |
| $ | 0.45 |
| $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | 0.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Diluted earnings per common units: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income (loss) available to common unitholders |
| $ | 0.45 |
| $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | 0.45 |
|
Quarter Ended 2017 |
| December 31 |
| September 30 |
| June 30 |
| March 31 |
| ||||
Total revenues |
| $ | 143,529 |
| $ | 160,018 |
| $ | 162,766 |
| $ | 149,887 |
|
Net income (loss) |
| $ | 5,411 |
| $ | 44,703 |
| $ | (39,125 | ) | $ | 22,729 |
|
Net income (loss) available to common unitholders |
| $ | 2,881 |
| $ | 42,467 |
| $ | (41,626 | ) | $ | 22,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic earnings per common unit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income (loss) available to common unitholders |
| $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.39 |
| $ | (0.44 | ) | $ | 0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Diluted earnings per common unit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income (loss) available to common unitholders |
| $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.39 |
| $ | (0.44 | ) | $ | 0.11 |
|
MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION, MACK-CALI REALTY, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 2018
(dollars in thousands)
SCHEDULE III
| Quarter Ended 2015 | December 31 | September 30 | June 30 | March 31 | |||||||
| Total revenues | $ | 146,443 | $ | 146,158 | $ | 148,567 | $ | 153,715 | |||
| Operating and other expenses | 60,846 | 56,850 | 60,653 | 68,255 | |||||||
| Real estate service salaries | 6,063 | 6,673 | 6,208 | 6,639 | |||||||
| General and administrative | 12,589 | 13,670 | 11,877 | 11,011 | |||||||
| Acquisition-related costs | 1,449 | - | 111 | - | |||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 43,136 | 44,099 | 42,365 | 40,802 | |||||||
| Impairments (1) | 33,743 | 164,176 | - | - | |||||||
| Total expenses | 157,826 | 285,468 | 121,214 | 126,707 | |||||||
| Operating Income (loss) | (11,383) | (139,310) | 27,353 | 27,008 | |||||||
| Interest expense | (24,374) | (24,689) | (26,773) | (27,215) | |||||||
| Interest and other investment income | 231 | 5 | 291 | 267 | |||||||
| Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated | |||||||||||
| joint ventures | (449) | 3,135 | (2,329) | (3,529) | |||||||
| Realized gains (losses) on disposition of rental properties | - | 18,718 | 34,399 | 144 | |||||||
| Gain on sale of investment in unconsolidated joint venture | - | - | 6,448 | - | |||||||
| Total other (expense) income | (24,592) | (2,831) | 12,036 | (30,333) | |||||||
| Net income (loss) | (35,975) | (142,141) | 39,389 | (3,325) | |||||||
| Noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures | 462 | (281) | 373 | 490 | |||||||
| Noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership | 3,795 | 15,530 | (4,383) | 314 | |||||||
| Net income (loss) available to common shareholders | $ | (31,718) | $ | (126,892) | $ | 35,379 | $ | (2,521) | |||
| Basic earnings per common share: | |||||||||||
| Net income (loss) available to common shareholders | $ | (0.35) | $ | (1.42) | $ | 0.40 | $ | (0.03) | |||
| Diluted earnings per common share: | |||||||||||
| Net income (loss) available to common shareholders | $ | (0.35) | $ | (1.42) | $ | 0.40 | $ | (0.03) | |||
| Dividends declared per common share | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Gross Amount at Which |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Costs |
| Carried at Close of |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Initial Costs |
| Capitalized |
| Period (a) |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| Property |
| Year |
|
|
| Related |
|
|
| Building and |
| Subsequent to |
|
|
| Building and |
|
|
| Accumulated |
|
Property Location |
| Type |
| Built |
| Acquired |
| Encumbrances |
| Land |
| Improvements |
| Acquisition(e) |
| Land |
| Improvements |
| Total (d) |
| Depreciation (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEW JERSEY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bergen County |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fort Lee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Bridge Plaza |
| Office |
| 1981 |
| 1996 |
| — |
| 2,439 |
| 24,462 |
| 7,436 |
| 2,439 |
| 31,898 |
| 34,337 |
| 17,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Essex County |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Millburn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150 J.F. Kennedy Parkway |
| Office |
| 1980 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 12,606 |
| 50,425 |
| 17,073 |
| 12,606 |
| 67,498 |
| 80,104 |
| 33,259 |
|
Roseland |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 J.F. Kennedy Parkway |
| Office |
| 1988 |
| 2017 |
| 69,459 |
| 5,873 |
| 100,359 |
| 575 |
| 5,873 |
| 100,934 |
| 106,807 |
| 6,806 |
|
101 J.F. Kennedy Parkway |
| Office |
| 1981 |
| 2017 |
| 29,197 |
| 4,380 |
| 59,730 |
| 1,151 |
| 4,380 |
| 60,881 |
| 65,261 |
| 4,063 |
|
103 J.F. Kennedy Parkway |
| Office |
| 1981 |
| 2017 |
| 24,875 |
| 3,158 |
| 50,813 |
| 469 |
| 3,158 |
| 51,282 |
| 54,440 |
| 3,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hudson County |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hoboken |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111 River Street |
| Office |
| 2002 |
| 2016 |
| — |
| 204 |
| 198,609 |
| 14,932 |
| — |
| 213,745 |
| 213,745 |
| 14,364 |
|
Jersey City |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harborside Plaza 1 |
| Office |
| 1983 |
| 1996 |
| — |
| 3,923 |
| 51,013 |
| 26,426 |
| 3,923 |
| 77,439 |
| 81,362 |
| 41,749 |
|
Harborside Plaza 2 |
| Office |
| 1990 |
| 1996 |
| — |
| 17,655 |
| 101,546 |
| 53,393 |
| 8,364 |
| 164,230 |
| 172,594 |
| 69,838 |
|
Harborside Plaza 3 |
| Office |
| 1990 |
| 1996 |
| — |
| 17,655 |
| 101,878 |
| 53,060 |
| 8,363 |
| 164,230 |
| 172,593 |
| 69,838 |
|
Harborside Plaza 4A |
| Office |
| 2000 |
| 2000 |
| — |
| 1,244 |
| 56,144 |
| 8,688 |
| 1,244 |
| 64,832 |
| 66,076 |
| 31,301 |
|
Harborside Plaza 5 |
| Office |
| 2002 |
| 2002 |
| — |
| 6,218 |
| 170,682 |
| 60,698 |
| 5,705 |
| 231,893 |
| 237,598 |
| 101,850 |
|
101 Hudson Street |
| Office |
| 1992 |
| 2005 |
| 248,460 |
| 45,530 |
| 271,376 |
| 33,508 |
| 45,530 |
| 304,884 |
| 350,414 |
| 103,639 |
|
Rosegarden Monaco |
| Multi-Family |
| 2011 |
| 2017 |
| 168,370 |
| 58,761 |
| 240,871 |
| 434 |
| 58,761 |
| 241,305 |
| 300,066 |
| 10,720 |
|
Marbella I |
| Multi-Family |
| 2003 |
| 2018 |
| 130,040 |
| 48,820 |
| 160,740 |
| 1,306 |
| 48,820 |
| 162,046 |
| 210,866 |
| 1,711 |
|
Weehawken |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 Avenue at Port Imperial |
| Other |
| 2016 |
| 2016 |
| — |
| 350 |
| — |
| 4,205 |
| 471 |
| 4,084 |
| 4,555 |
| 310 |
|
500 Avenue at Port Imperial |
| Other |
| 2013 |
| 2013 |
| 36,568 |
| 13,099 |
| 56,669 |
| (19,756 | ) | 13,099 |
| 36,913 |
| 50,012 |
| 4,925 |
|
Port Imperial South 11 |
| Multi-Family |
| 2018 |
| 2018 |
| 99,792 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 22,047 |
| 108,392 |
| 130,439 |
| 577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mercer County |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Princeton |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 Overlook Center |
| Office |
| 1988 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 2,378 |
| 21,754 |
| 4,577 |
| 2,378 |
| 26,331 |
| 28,709 |
| 13,218 |
|
5 Vaughn Drive |
| Office |
| 1987 |
| 1995 |
| — |
| 657 |
| 9,800 |
| 1,564 |
| 657 |
| 11,364 |
| 12,021 |
| 6,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middlesex County |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edison |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
333 Thornall Street |
| Office |
| 1984 |
| 2015 |
| — |
| 5,542 |
| 40,762 |
| 3,686 |
| 5,542 |
| 44,448 |
| 49,990 |
| 4,933 |
|
343 Thornall Street |
| Office |
| 1991 |
| 2006 |
| — |
| 6,027 |
| 39,101 |
| 15,160 |
| 6,027 |
| 54,261 |
| 60,288 |
| 16,308 |
|
Iselin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 Wood Avenue South |
| Office |
| 1990 |
| 2016 |
| — |
| 8,509 |
| 72,738 |
| 1,183 |
| 7,384 |
| 75,046 |
| 82,430 |
| 6,936 |
|
New Brunswick |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richmond Court |
| Multi-Family |
| 1997 |
| 2013 |
| — |
| 2,992 |
| 13,534 |
| 1,908 |
| 2,992 |
| 15,442 |
| 18,434 |
| 1,856 |
|
Riverwatch Commons |
| Multi-Family |
| 1995 |
| 2013 |
| — |
| 4,169 |
| 18,974 |
| 2,187 |
| 4,169 |
| 21,161 |
| 25,330 |
| 2,534 |
|
Plainsboro |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 College Road East (c) |
| Office |
| 1984 |
| 1998 |
|
|
| 614 |
| 20,626 |
| 5,776 |
| 614 |
| 26,402 |
| 27,016 |
| 14,225 |
|
Woodbridge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
581 Main Street |
| Office |
| 1991 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 3,237 |
| 12,949 |
| 35,315 |
| 8,115 |
| 43,386 |
| 51,501 |
| 16,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monmouth County |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holmdel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 Main Street |
| Office |
| 1977 |
| 2005 |
| — |
| 4,336 |
| 19,544 |
| 6,377 |
| 4,336 |
| 25,921 |
| 30,257 |
| 8,116 |
|
Middletown |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One River Center, Building 1 |
| Office |
| 1983 |
| 2004 |
| — |
| 3,070 |
| 17,414 |
| 16,094 |
| 2,451 |
| 34,127 |
| 36,578 |
| 8,385 |
|
One River Center, Building 2 |
| Office |
| 1983 |
| 2004 |
| — |
| 2,468 |
| 15,043 |
| 4,175 |
| 2,452 |
| 19,234 |
| 21,686 |
| 7,880 |
|
One River Center, Building 3 |
| Office |
| 1984 |
| 2004 |
| — |
| 4,051 |
| 24,790 |
| 5,688 |
| 4,627 |
| 29,902 |
| 34,529 |
| 11,525 |
|
Neptune |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3600 Route 66 |
| Office |
| 1989 |
| 1995 |
| — |
| 1,098 |
| 18,146 |
| 11,461 |
| 1,098 |
| 29,607 |
| 30,705 |
| 15,555 |
|
Red Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 Schultz Drive |
| Office |
| 1989 |
| 2017 |
| — |
| 1,953 |
| 6,790 |
| 1,126 |
| 1,953 |
| 7,916 |
| 9,869 |
| 905 |
|
200 Schultz Drive |
| Office |
| 1989 |
| 2017 |
| — |
| 2,184 |
| 8,259 |
| 1,165 |
| 2,184 |
| 9,424 |
| 11,608 |
| 1,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Gross Amount at Which |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Costs |
| Carried at Close of |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Initial Costs |
| Capitalized |
| Period (a) |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| Property |
| Year |
|
|
| Related |
|
|
| Building and |
| Subsequent to |
|
|
| Building and |
|
|
| Accumulated |
|
Property Location |
| Type |
| Built |
| Acquired |
| Encumbrances |
| Land |
| Improvements |
| Acquisition(e) |
| Land |
| Improvements |
| Total (d) |
| Depreciation (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Morris County |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florham Park |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325 Columbia Parkway |
| Office |
| 1987 |
| 1994 |
| — |
| 1,564 |
| — |
| 18,616 |
| 1,564 |
| 18,616 |
| 20,180 |
| 13,036 |
|
Madison |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Giralda Farms |
| Office |
| 1982 |
| 2017 |
| — |
| 3,370 |
| 27,145 |
| 734 |
| 3,370 |
| 27,879 |
| 31,249 |
| 2,260 |
|
7 Giralda Farms |
| Office |
| 1997 |
| 2017 |
| — |
| 5,402 |
| 37,664 |
| 510 |
| 5,402 |
| 38,174 |
| 43,576 |
| 2,766 |
|
Morris Plains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature Place |
| Multi-Family |
|
|
|
|
| 41,703 |
| 930 |
| — |
| 56,373 |
| 930 |
| 56,373 |
| 57,303 |
| 922 |
|
Parsippany |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 Campus Drive |
| Office |
| 1983 |
| 2001 |
| — |
| 5,213 |
| 20,984 |
| 4,052 |
| 5,213 |
| 25,036 |
| 30,249 |
| 11,490 |
|
6 Campus Drive |
| Office |
| 1983 |
| 2001 |
| — |
| 4,411 |
| 17,796 |
| 3,945 |
| 4,411 |
| 21,741 |
| 26,152 |
| 9,665 |
|
7 Campus Drive |
| Office |
| 1982 |
| 1998 |
| — |
| 1,932 |
| 27,788 |
| 6,757 |
| 1,932 |
| 34,545 |
| 36,477 |
| 18,408 |
|
8 Campus Drive |
| Office |
| 1987 |
| 1998 |
| — |
| 1,865 |
| 35,456 |
| 12,475 |
| 1,865 |
| 47,931 |
| 49,796 |
| 22,089 |
|
9 Campus Drive |
| Office |
| 1983 |
| 2001 |
| — |
| 3,277 |
| 11,796 |
| 22,721 |
| 5,842 |
| 31,952 |
| 37,794 |
| 13,474 |
|
2 Dryden Way |
| Office |
| 1990 |
| 1998 |
| — |
| 778 |
| 420 |
| 110 |
| 778 |
| 530 |
| 1,308 |
| 320 |
|
4 Gatehall Drive |
| Office |
| 1988 |
| 2000 |
| — |
| 8,452 |
| 33,929 |
| 7,788 |
| 8,452 |
| 41,717 |
| 50,169 |
| 18,726 |
|
2 Hilton Court |
| Office |
| 1991 |
| 1998 |
| — |
| 1,971 |
| 32,007 |
| 4,474 |
| 1,971 |
| 36,481 |
| 38,452 |
| 19,992 |
|
1 Sylvan Way |
| Office |
| 1989 |
| 1998 |
| — |
| 1,689 |
| 24,699 |
| 4,984 |
| 1,021 |
| 30,351 |
| 31,372 |
| 14,094 |
|
3 Sylvan Way |
| Office |
| 1988 |
| 2015 |
| — |
| 5,590 |
| 4,710 |
| 9,840 |
| 5,590 |
| 14,550 |
| 20,140 |
| 845 |
|
5 Sylvan Way |
| Office |
| 1989 |
| 1998 |
| — |
| 1,160 |
| 25,214 |
| 7,056 |
| 1,161 |
| 32,269 |
| 33,430 |
| 14,774 |
|
7 Sylvan Way |
| Office |
| 1987 |
| 1998 |
| — |
| 2,084 |
| 26,083 |
| 14,823 |
| 2,084 |
| 40,906 |
| 42,990 |
| 15,697 |
|
5 Wood Hollow Road |
| Office |
| 1979 |
| 2004 |
| — |
| 5,302 |
| 26,488 |
| 21,087 |
| 5,302 |
| 47,575 |
| 52,877 |
| 21,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEW YORK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Westchester County |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eastchester |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarry Place at Tuckahoe |
| Multi-Family |
| 2016 |
| 2016 |
| 40,433 |
| 5,585 |
| 3,400 |
| 48,718 |
| 5,585 |
| 52,118 |
| 57,703 |
| 2,573 |
|
Elmsford |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 Clearbrook Road |
| Office/Flex |
| 1974 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 149 |
| 2,159 |
| 504 |
| 149 |
| 2,663 |
| 2,812 |
| 1,479 |
|
75 Clearbrook Road |
| Office/Flex |
| 1990 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 2,314 |
| 4,716 |
| 57 |
| 2,314 |
| 4,773 |
| 7,087 |
| 2,621 |
|
100 Clearbrook Road |
| Office |
| 1975 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 220 |
| 5,366 |
| 1,846 |
| 220 |
| 7,212 |
| 7,432 |
| 3,620 |
|
125 Clearbrook Road |
| Office/Flex |
| 2002 |
| 2002 |
| — |
| 1,055 |
| 3,676 |
| (292 | ) | 1,055 |
| 3,384 |
| 4,439 |
| 1,685 |
|
150 Clearbrook Road |
| Office/Flex |
| 1975 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 497 |
| 7,030 |
| 2,198 |
| 497 |
| 9,228 |
| 9,725 |
| 4,927 |
|
175 Clearbrook Road |
| Office/Flex |
| 1973 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 655 |
| 7,473 |
| 973 |
| 655 |
| 8,446 |
| 9,101 |
| 4,731 |
|
200 Clearbrook Road |
| Office/Flex |
| 1974 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 579 |
| 6,620 |
| 1,667 |
| 579 |
| 8,287 |
| 8,866 |
| 4,343 |
|
250 Clearbrook Road |
| Office/Flex |
| 1973 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 867 |
| 8,647 |
| 2,387 |
| 867 |
| 11,034 |
| 11,901 |
| 5,813 |
|
50 Executive Boulevard |
| Office/Flex |
| 1969 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 237 |
| 2,617 |
| 540 |
| 237 |
| 3,157 |
| 3,394 |
| 1,731 |
|
77 Executive Boulevard |
| Office/Flex |
| 1977 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 34 |
| 1,104 |
| 179 |
| 34 |
| 1,283 |
| 1,317 |
| 740 |
|
85 Executive Boulevard |
| Office/Flex |
| 1968 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 155 |
| 2,507 |
| 456 |
| 155 |
| 2,963 |
| 3,118 |
| 1,584 |
|
101 Executive Boulevard |
| Office |
| 1971 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 101 |
| 5,197 |
| 5,298 |
| 101 |
| 5,197 |
| 5,298 |
| 119 |
|
300 Executive Boulevard |
| Office/Flex |
| 1970 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 460 |
| 3,609 |
| 307 |
| 460 |
| 3,916 |
| 4,376 |
| 2,132 |
|
350 Executive Boulevard |
| Office/Flex |
| 1970 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 100 |
| 1,793 |
| 175 |
| 100 |
| 1,968 |
| 2,068 |
| 1,146 |
|
399 Executive Boulevard |
| Office/Flex |
| 1962 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 531 |
| 7,191 |
| 163 |
| 531 |
| 7,354 |
| 7,885 |
| 4,077 |
|
400 Executive Boulevard |
| Office/Flex |
| 1970 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 2,202 |
| 1,846 |
| 1,140 |
| 2,202 |
| 2,986 |
| 5,188 |
| 1,807 |
|
500 Executive Boulevard |
| Office/Flex |
| 1970 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 258 |
| 4,183 |
| 508 |
| 258 |
| 4,691 |
| 4,949 |
| 2,655 |
|
525 Executive Boulevard |
| Office/Flex |
| 1972 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 345 |
| 5,499 |
| 837 |
| 345 |
| 6,336 |
| 6,681 |
| 3,661 |
|
1 Westchester Plaza |
| Office/Flex |
| 1967 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 199 |
| 2,023 |
| 183 |
| 199 |
| 2,206 |
| 2,405 |
| 1,214 |
|
2 Westchester Plaza |
| Office/Flex |
| 1968 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 234 |
| 2,726 |
| 914 |
| 234 |
| 3,640 |
| 3,874 |
| 1,971 |
|
3 Westchester Plaza |
| Office/Flex |
| 1969 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 655 |
| 7,936 |
| 1,433 |
| 655 |
| 9,369 |
| 10,024 |
| 4,876 |
|
4 Westchester Plaza |
| Office/Flex |
| 1969 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 320 |
| 3,729 |
| 1,531 |
| 320 |
| 5,260 |
| 5,580 |
| 2,512 |
|
5 Westchester Plaza |
| Office/Flex |
| 1969 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 118 |
| 1,949 |
| 303 |
| 118 |
| 2,252 |
| 2,370 |
| 1,184 |
|
6 Westchester Plaza |
| Office/Flex |
| 1968 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 164 |
| 1,998 |
| 202 |
| 164 |
| 2,200 |
| 2,364 |
| 1,197 |
|
7 Westchester Plaza |
| Office/Flex |
| 1972 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 286 |
| 4,321 |
| 1,168 |
| 286 |
| 5,489 |
| 5,775 |
| 2,781 |
|
8 Westchester Plaza |
| Office/Flex |
| 1971 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 447 |
| 5,262 |
| 2,127 |
| 447 |
| 7,389 |
| 7,836 |
| 4,025 |
|
Hawthorne |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 Saw Mill River Road |
| Office/Flex |
| 1965 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 353 |
| 3,353 |
| 833 |
| 353 |
| 4,186 |
| 4,539 |
| 2,110 |
|
1 Skyline Drive |
| Office |
| 1980 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 66 |
| 1,711 |
| 210 |
| 66 |
| 1,921 |
| 1,987 |
| 1,102 |
|
2 Skyline Drive |
| Office |
| 1987 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 109 |
| 3,128 |
| 1,474 |
| 109 |
| 4,602 |
| 4,711 |
| 2,909 |
|
4 Skyline Drive |
| Office/Flex |
| 1987 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 363 |
| 7,513 |
| 2,140 |
| 363 |
| 9,653 |
| 10,016 |
| 5,635 |
|
5 Skyline Drive |
| Office/Flex |
| 1980 |
| 2001 |
| — |
| 2,219 |
| 8,916 |
| 1,472 |
| 2,219 |
| 10,388 |
| 12,607 |
| 5,340 |
|
6 Skyline Drive |
| Office/Flex |
| 1980 |
| 2001 |
| — |
| 740 |
| 2,971 |
| 535 |
| 740 |
| 3,506 |
| 4,246 |
| 1,942 |
|
7 Skyline Drive |
| Office |
| 1987 |
| 1998 |
| — |
| 330 |
| 13,013 |
| 2,733 |
| 330 |
| 15,746 |
| 16,076 |
| 8,071 |
|
8 Skyline Drive |
| Office/Flex |
| 1985 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 212 |
| 4,410 |
| 836 |
| 212 |
| 5,246 |
| 5,458 |
| 3,036 |
|
10 Skyline Drive |
| Office/Flex |
| 1985 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 134 |
| 2,799 |
| 271 |
| 134 |
| 3,070 |
| 3,204 |
| 1,630 |
|
11 Skyline Drive (c) |
| Office/Flex |
| 1989 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| — |
| 4,788 |
| 763 |
| — |
| 5,551 |
| 5,551 |
| 2,906 |
|
12 Skyline Drive (c) |
| Office/Flex |
| 1999 |
| 1999 |
| — |
| 1,562 |
| 3,254 |
| 218 |
| 1,320 |
| 3,714 |
| 5,034 |
| 1,911 |
|
15 Skyline Drive (c) |
| Office/Flex |
| 1989 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| — |
| 7,449 |
| 1,858 |
| — |
| 9,307 |
| 9,307 |
| 4,537 |
|
17 Skyline Drive (c) |
| Office |
| 1989 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| — |
| 7,269 |
| 1,248 |
| — |
| 8,517 |
| 8,517 |
| 4,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Gross Amount at Which |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Costs |
| Carried at Close of |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Initial Costs |
| Capitalized |
| Period (a) |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| Property |
| Year |
|
|
| Related |
|
|
| Building and |
| Subsequent to |
|
|
| Building and |
|
|
| Accumulated |
|
Property Location |
| Type |
| Built |
| Acquired |
| Encumbrances |
| Land |
| Improvements |
| Acquisition(e) |
| Land |
| Improvements |
| Total (d) |
| Depreciation (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tarrytown |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230 White Plains Road |
| Retail |
| 1984 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 124 |
| 1,845 |
| 288 |
| 124 |
| 2,133 |
| 2,257 |
| 1,108 |
|
Yonkers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 Corporate Boulevard |
| Office/Flex |
| 1987 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 602 |
| 9,910 |
| 1,175 |
| 602 |
| 11,085 |
| 11,687 |
| 6,143 |
|
200 Corporate Boulevard South |
| Office/Flex |
| 1990 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 502 |
| 7,575 |
| 2,585 |
| 502 |
| 10,160 |
| 10,662 |
| 5,017 |
|
1 Executive Boulevard |
| Office |
| 1982 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 1,104 |
| 11,904 |
| 3,688 |
| 1,105 |
| 15,591 |
| 16,696 |
| 8,210 |
|
2 Executive Boulevard |
| Retail |
| 1986 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 89 |
| 2,439 |
| 107 |
| 89 |
| 2,546 |
| 2,635 |
| 1,397 |
|
3 Executive Boulevard |
| Office |
| 1987 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 385 |
| 6,256 |
| 1,803 |
| 385 |
| 8,059 |
| 8,444 |
| 4,496 |
|
4 Executive Plaza |
| Office/Flex |
| 1986 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 584 |
| 6,134 |
| 854 |
| 584 |
| 6,988 |
| 7,572 |
| 3,723 |
|
6 Executive Plaza |
| Office/Flex |
| 1987 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 546 |
| 7,246 |
| 2,212 |
| 546 |
| 9,458 |
| 10,004 |
| 5,127 |
|
1 Odell Plaza |
| Office/Flex |
| 1980 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 1,206 |
| 6,815 |
| 2,349 |
| 1,206 |
| 9,164 |
| 10,370 |
| 5,093 |
|
3 Odell Plaza |
| Office |
| 1984 |
| 2003 |
| — |
| 1,322 |
| 4,777 |
| 2,360 |
| 1,322 |
| 7,137 |
| 8,459 |
| 3,976 |
|
5 Odell Plaza |
| Office/Flex |
| 1983 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 331 |
| 2,988 |
| 476 |
| 331 |
| 3,464 |
| 3,795 |
| 2,029 |
|
7 Odell Plaza |
| Office/Flex |
| 1984 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 419 |
| 4,418 |
| 1,303 |
| 419 |
| 5,721 |
| 6,140 |
| 2,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONNECTICUT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fairfield County |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stamford |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
419 West Avenue |
| Office/Flex |
| 1986 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 4,538 |
| 9,246 |
| 482 |
| 4,538 |
| 9,728 |
| 14,266 |
| 5,316 |
|
500 West Avenue |
| Office/Flex |
| 1988 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 415 |
| 1,679 |
| 646 |
| 415 |
| 2,325 |
| 2,740 |
| 1,221 |
|
550 West Avenue |
| Office/Flex |
| 1990 |
| 1997 |
| — |
| 1,975 |
| 3,856 |
| 133 |
| 1,975 |
| 3,989 |
| 5,964 |
| 2,172 |
|
600 West Avenue |
| Office/Flex |
| 1999 |
| 1999 |
| — |
| 2,305 |
| 2,863 |
| 1,184 |
| 2,305 |
| 4,047 |
| 6,352 |
| 1,739 |
|
650 West Avenue |
| Office/Flex |
| 1998 |
| 1998 |
| — |
| 1,328 |
| — |
| 3,247 |
| 1,328 |
| 3,247 |
| 4,575 |
| 1,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MASSACHUSETTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middlesex County |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Malden |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Chase at Overlook Ridge |
| Multi-Family |
| 2016 |
| 2016 |
| 134,839 |
| 11,072 |
| 87,793 |
| 74,692 |
| 21,827 |
| 151,730 |
| 173,557 |
| 9,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suffolk County |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East Boston |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portside at Pier One |
| Multi-Family |
| 2016 |
| 2016 |
| 58,644 |
| — |
| 73,713 |
| 446 |
| — |
| 74,159 |
| 74,159 |
| 6,163 |
|
Portside 5/6 |
| Multi-Family |
| 2018 |
| 2018 |
| 96,369 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 113,913 |
| 113,913 |
| 1,268 |
|
Revere |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alterra at Overlook Ridge IA |
| Multi-Family |
| 2004 |
| 2013 |
| 40,102 |
| 9,042 |
| 50,671 |
| 1,072 |
| 9,042 |
| 51,743 |
| 60,785 |
| 7,933 |
|
Alterra at Overlook Ridge II |
| Multi-Family |
| 2008 |
| 2013 |
| 59,371 |
| 12,055 |
| 71,409 |
| 409 |
| 12,056 |
| 71,817 |
| 83,873 |
| 10,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projects Under Development and Developable Land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 128,017 |
| 363,272 |
| 489,567 |
| — |
| 363,272 |
| 489,567 |
| 852,839 |
| 14,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 53,718 |
| — |
| 53,718 |
| 53,718 |
| 15,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTALS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1,406,239 |
| 788,261 |
| 3,455,975 |
| 817,429 |
| 807,236 |
| 4,498,781 |
| 5,306,017 |
| 1,097,868 |
|
| Quarter Ended 2014 | December 31 | September 30 | June 30 | March 31 | |||||||
| Total revenues | $ | 151,414 | $ | 155,489 | $ | 160,300 | $ | 169,596 | |||
| Operating and other expenses | 64,177 | 64,374 | 65,788 | 81,854 | |||||||
| Real estate service salaries | 5,923 | 6,933 | 6,571 | 6,709 | |||||||
| General and administrative | 23,775 | 12,665 | 11,730 | 22,881 | |||||||
| Acquisition-related costs | 175 | - | 1,943 | - | |||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 40,811 | 41,983 | 44,711 | 44,985 | |||||||
| Total expenses | 134,861 | 125,955 | 130,743 | 156,429 | |||||||
| Operating Income | 16,553 | 29,534 | 29,557 | 13,167 | |||||||
| Interest expense | (27,420) | (27,353) | (28,159) | (29,946) | |||||||
| Interest and other investment income | 1,399 | 908 | 922 | 386 | |||||||
| Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated | |||||||||||
| joint ventures | (363) | (1,268) | 443 | (1,235) | |||||||
| Realized gains (losses) on disposition of rental properties | - | 264 | 54,584 | - | |||||||
| Loss from early extinguishment of debt | (582) | - | - | - | |||||||
| Total other (expense) income | (26,966) | (27,449) | 27,790 | (30,795) | |||||||
| Net income (loss) | (10,413) | 2,085 | 57,347 | (17,628) | |||||||
| Noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures | 21 | 145 | 290 | 322 | |||||||
| Noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership | 1,152 | (248) | (6,514) | 2,008 | |||||||
| Net income (loss) available to common shareholders | $ | (9,240) | $ | 1,982 | $ | 51,123 | $ | (15,298) | |||
| Basic earnings per common share: | |||||||||||
| Net income (loss) available to common shareholders | $ | (0.10) | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.58 | $ | (0.17) | |||
| Diluted earnings per common share: | |||||||||||
| Net income (loss) available to common shareholders | $ | (0.10) | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.58 | $ | (0.17) | |||
| Dividends declared per common share | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.30 |
| MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION | |||||||||||
| REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION | |||||||||||
| December 31, 2015 | |||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||
| SCHEDULE III | |||||||||||
| Gross Amount at Which | |||||||||||
| Costs | Carried at Close of | ||||||||||
| Initial Costs | Capitalized | Period (a) | |||||||||
| Property | Year | Related | Building and | Subsequent | Building and | Accumulated | |||||
| Property Location | Type | Built | Acquired | Encumbrances | Land | Improvements | to Acquisition | Land | Improvements | Total | Depreciation (b) |
| NEW JERSEY | |||||||||||
| Bergen County | |||||||||||
| Fort Lee | |||||||||||
| One Bridge Plaza | Office | 1981 | 1996 | - | 2,439 | 24,462 | 7,444 | 2,439 | 31,906 | 34,345 | 14,813 |
| 2115 Linwood Avenue | Office | 1981 | 1998 | - | 474 | 4,419 | 7,017 | 474 | 11,436 | 11,910 | 4,083 |
| Montvale | |||||||||||
| 135 Chestnut Ridge Road | Office | 1981 | 1997 | - | 2,587 | 10,350 | (4,659) | 1,437 | 6,841 | 8,278 | 3,026 |
| Paramus | |||||||||||
| 15 East Midland Avenue | Office | 1988 | 1997 | 12,438 | 10,375 | 41,497 | 2,490 | 10,374 | 43,988 | 54,362 | 19,632 |
| 140 East Ridgewood Avenue | Office | 1981 | 1997 | 11,720 | 7,932 | 31,463 | 7,578 | 7,932 | 39,041 | 46,973 | 17,789 |
| 461 From Road | Office | 1988 | 1997 | - | 13,194 | 52,778 | 10,587 | 13,194 | 63,365 | 76,559 | 24,838 |
| 650 From Road | Office | 1978 | 1997 | 22,484 | 10,487 | 41,949 | 8,189 | 10,487 | 50,138 | 60,625 | 22,344 |
| 61 South Paramus Road (c) | Office | 1985 | 1997 | 22,005 | 9,005 | 36,018 | 9,162 | 9,005 | 45,180 | 54,185 | 20,390 |
| Rochelle Park | |||||||||||
| 120 West Passaic Street | Office | 1972 | 1997 | - | 1,354 | 5,415 | 431 | 1,357 | 5,843 | 7,200 | 2,582 |
| 365 West Passaic Street | Office | 1976 | 1997 | 11,720 | 4,148 | 16,592 | 5,497 | 4,148 | 22,089 | 26,237 | 9,804 |
| 395 West Passaic Street | Office | 1979 | 2006 | - | 2,550 | 17,131 | 1,020 | 2,550 | 18,151 | 20,701 | 4,324 |
| Upper Saddle River | |||||||||||
| 1 Lake Street | Office | 1994 | 1997 | 40,184 | 13,952 | 55,812 | (37,797) | 6,268 | 25,699 | 31,967 | 15,132 |
| 10 Mountainview Road | Office | 1986 | 1998 | - | 4,240 | 20,485 | 4,743 | 4,240 | 25,228 | 29,468 | 11,358 |
| Woodcliff Lake | |||||||||||
| 400 Chestnut Ridge Road | Office | 1982 | 1997 | - | 4,201 | 16,802 | (6,770) | 2,312 | 11,921 | 14,233 | 6,579 |
| 50 Tice Boulevard | Office | 1984 | 1994 | 22,962 | 4,500 | - | 27,862 | 4,500 | 27,862 | 32,362 | 19,320 |
| 300 Tice Boulevard | Office | 1991 | 1996 | - | 5,424 | 29,688 | 6,385 | 5,424 | 36,073 | 41,497 | 16,438 |
| Burlington County | |||||||||||
| Burlington | |||||||||||
| 3 Terri Lane | Office/Flex | 1991 | 1998 | - | 652 | 3,433 | 1,549 | 658 | 4,976 | 5,634 | 2,285 |
| 5 Terri Lane | Office/Flex | 1992 | 1998 | - | 564 | 3,792 | 2,272 | 569 | 6,059 | 6,628 | 2,856 |
| Moorestown | |||||||||||
| 2 Commerce Drive | Office/Flex | 1986 | 1999 | - | 723 | 2,893 | 544 | 723 | 3,437 | 4,160 | 1,461 |
| 101 Commerce Drive | Office/Flex | 1988 | 1998 | - | 422 | 3,528 | 436 | 426 | 3,960 | 4,386 | 1,893 |
| 102 Commerce Drive | Office/Flex | 1987 | 1999 | - | 389 | 1,554 | 482 | 389 | 2,036 | 2,425 | 732 |
| 201 Commerce Drive | Office/Flex | 1986 | 1998 | - | 254 | 1,694 | 349 | 258 | 2,039 | 2,297 | 922 |
| 202 Commerce Drive | Office/Flex | 1988 | 1999 | - | 490 | 1,963 | 384 | 490 | 2,347 | 2,837 | 919 |
| 1 Executive Drive | Office/Flex | 1989 | 1998 | - | 226 | 1,453 | 772 | 228 | 2,223 | 2,451 | 979 |
| 2 Executive Drive | Office/Flex | 1988 | 2000 | - | 801 | 3,206 | 980 | 801 | 4,186 | 4,987 | 1,530 |
| 101 Executive Drive | Office/Flex | 1990 | 1998 | - | 241 | 2,262 | 701 | 244 | 2,960 | 3,204 | 1,328 |
| 102 Executive Drive | Office/Flex | 1990 | 1998 | - | 353 | 3,607 | 420 | 357 | 4,023 | 4,380 | 1,812 |
| 225 Executive Drive | Office/Flex | 1990 | 1998 | - | 323 | 2,477 | 457 | 326 | 2,931 | 3,257 | 1,280 |
| 97 Foster Road | Office/Flex | 1982 | 1998 | - | 208 | 1,382 | 389 | 211 | 1,768 | 1,979 | 885 |
| 1507 Lancer Drive | Office/Flex | 1995 | 1998 | - | 119 | 1,106 | 209 | 120 | 1,314 | 1,434 | 612 |
| 1245 North Church Street | Office/Flex | 1998 | 2001 | - | 691 | 2,810 | 110 | 691 | 2,920 | 3,611 | 1,078 |
| 1247 North Church Street | Office/Flex | 1998 | 2001 | - | 805 | 3,269 | 175 | 805 | 3,444 | 4,249 | 1,287 |
| MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION | |||||||||||
| REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION | |||||||||||
| December 31, 2015 | |||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||
| SCHEDULE III | |||||||||||
| Gross Amount at Which | |||||||||||
| Costs | Carried at Close of | ||||||||||
| Initial Costs | Capitalized | Period (a) | |||||||||
| Year | Related | Building and | Subsequent | Building and | Accumulated | ||||||
| Property Location | Built | Acquired | Encumbrances | Land | Improvements | to Acquisition | Land | Improvements | Total | Depreciation (b) | |
| 1256 North Church Street | Office/Flex | 1984 | 1998 | - | 354 | 3,098 | 658 | 357 | 3,753 | 4,110 | 1,678 |
| 840 North Lenola Road | Office/Flex | 1995 | 1998 | - | 329 | 2,366 | 499 | 333 | 2,861 | 3,194 | 1,286 |
| 844 North Lenola Road | Office/Flex | 1995 | 1998 | - | 239 | 1,714 | 298 | 241 | 2,010 | 2,251 | 957 |
| 915 North Lenola Road | Office/Flex | 1998 | 2000 | - | 508 | 2,034 | 215 | 508 | 2,249 | 2,757 | 985 |
| 2 Twosome Drive | Office/Flex | 2000 | 2001 | - | 701 | 2,807 | 225 | 701 | 3,032 | 3,733 | 1,077 |
| 30 Twosome Drive | Office/Flex | 1997 | 1998 | - | 234 | 1,954 | 510 | 236 | 2,462 | 2,698 | 1,251 |
| 31 Twosome Drive | Office/Flex | 1998 | 2001 | - | 815 | 3,276 | 258 | 815 | 3,534 | 4,349 | 1,303 |
| 40 Twosome Drive | Office/Flex | 1996 | 1998 | - | 297 | 2,393 | 160 | 301 | 2,549 | 2,850 | 1,180 |
| 41 Twosome Drive | Office/Flex | 1998 | 2001 | - | 605 | 2,459 | 214 | 605 | 2,673 | 3,278 | 1,016 |
| 50 Twosome Drive | Office/Flex | 1997 | 1998 | - | 301 | 2,330 | 98 | 304 | 2,425 | 2,729 | 1,133 |
| Essex County | |||||||||||
| Millburn | |||||||||||
| 150 J.F. Kennedy Parkway | Office | 1980 | 1997 | - | 12,606 | 50,425 | 8,203 | 12,606 | 58,628 | 71,234 | 25,768 |
| Roseland | |||||||||||
| 4 Becker Farm Road | Office | 1983 | 2009 | 40,083 | 5,600 | 38,285 | (9,089) | 4,271 | 30,525 | 34,796 | 6,756 |
| 6 Becker Farm Road | Office | 1983 | 2009 | 13,829 | 2,600 | 15,548 | (7,006) | 1,556 | 9,586 | 11,142 | 2,055 |
| 101 Eisenhower Parkway | Office | 1980 | 1994 | - | 228 | - | 21,850 | 228 | 21,850 | 22,078 | 14,063 |
| 103 Eisenhower Parkway | Office | 1985 | 1994 | - | - | - | 16,898 | 2,300 | 14,598 | 16,898 | 9,448 |
| 105 Eisenhower Parkway | Office | 2001 | 2001 | - | 4,430 | 42,898 | 5,670 | 3,835 | 49,163 | 52,998 | 22,616 |
| 75 Livingston Avenue | Office | 1985 | 2009 | 10,599 | 1,900 | 6,312 | (1,630) | 1,281 | 5,301 | 6,582 | 1,206 |
| 85 Livingston Avenue | Office | 1985 | 2009 | 14,862 | 2,500 | 14,238 | (8,238) | 1,234 | 7,266 | 8,500 | 1,622 |
| Hudson County | |||||||||||
| Jersey City | |||||||||||
| Harborside Plaza 1 | Office | 1983 | 1996 | - | 3,923 | 51,013 | 27,985 | 3,923 | 78,998 | 82,921 | 39,183 |
| Harborside Plaza 2 | Office | 1990 | 1996 | - | 17,655 | 101,546 | 25,245 | 12,844 | 131,602 | 144,446 | 58,486 |
| Harborside Plaza 3 | Office | 1990 | 1996 | - | 17,655 | 101,878 | 24,911 | 12,843 | 131,601 | 144,444 | 58,486 |
| Harborside Plaza 4A | Office | 2000 | 2000 | - | 1,244 | 56,144 | 14,601 | 1,244 | 70,745 | 71,989 | 30,770 |
| Harborside Plaza 5 | Office | 2002 | 2002 | 217,736 | 6,218 | 170,682 | 56,368 | 5,705 | 227,563 | 233,268 | 86,807 |
| 101 Hudson Street | Office | 1992 | 2005 | - | 45,530 | 271,376 | 4,723 | 45,530 | 276,099 | 321,629 | 76,102 |
| Weehawken | |||||||||||
| 500 Avenue at Port Imperial | Other | 2013 | 2013 | 36,600 | 13,099 | 56,669 | (21,005) | 13,099 | 35,664 | 48,763 | 2,174 |
| Mercer County | |||||||||||
| Hamilton Township | |||||||||||
| 3 AAA Drive | Office | 1981 | 2007 | - | 242 | 3,218 | 1,391 | 242 | 4,609 | 4,851 | 1,321 |
| 100 Horizon Center Boulevard | Office/Flex | 1989 | 1995 | - | 205 | 1,676 | 730 | 325 | 2,286 | 2,611 | 1,029 |
| 200 Horizon Drive | Office/Flex | 1991 | 1995 | - | 205 | 3,027 | 715 | 357 | 3,590 | 3,947 | 1,845 |
| 300 Horizon Drive | Office/Flex | 1989 | 1995 | - | 379 | 4,355 | 1,428 | 531 | 5,631 | 6,162 | 2,641 |
| 500 Horizon Drive | Office/Flex | 1990 | 1995 | - | 379 | 3,395 | 901 | 496 | 4,179 | 4,675 | 2,152 |
| 600 Horizon Drive | Office/Flex | 2002 | 2002 | - | - | 7,549 | 709 | 685 | 7,573 | 8,258 | 2,478 |
| MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION | |||||||||||
| REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION | |||||||||||
| December 31, 2015 | |||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||
| SCHEDULE III | |||||||||||
| Gross Amount at Which | |||||||||||
| Costs | Carried at Close of | ||||||||||
| Initial Costs | Capitalized | Period (a) | |||||||||
| Year | Related | Building and | Subsequent | Building and | Accumulated | ||||||
| Property Location | Built | Acquired | Encumbrances | Land | Improvements | to Acquisition | Land | Improvements | Total | Depreciation (b) | |
| 700 Horizon Drive | Office | 2007 | 2007 | - | 490 | 43 | 16,663 | 865 | 16,331 | 17,196 | 4,028 |
| 2 South Gold Drive | Office | 1974 | 2007 | - | 476 | 3,487 | 846 | 476 | 4,333 | 4,809 | 967 |
| Princeton | |||||||||||
| 103 Carnegie Center | Office | 1984 | 1996 | - | 2,566 | 7,868 | 3,304 | 2,566 | 11,172 | 13,738 | 5,460 |
| 2 Independence Way | Office | 1985 | 2009 | - | 1,300 | 7,246 | (4,079) | 702 | 3,765 | 4,467 | 166 |
| 3 Independence Way | Office | 1983 | 1997 | - | 1,997 | 11,391 | 4,374 | 1,997 | 15,765 | 17,762 | 7,732 |
| 100 Overlook Center | Office | 1988 | 1997 | - | 2,378 | 21,754 | 3,666 | 2,378 | 25,420 | 27,798 | 11,149 |
| 5 Vaughn Drive | Office | 1987 | 1995 | - | 657 | 9,800 | 2,962 | 657 | 12,762 | 13,419 | 6,823 |
| Middlesex County | |||||||||||
| East Brunswick | |||||||||||
| 377 Summerhill Road | Office | 1977 | 1997 | - | 649 | 2,594 | 324 | 649 | 2,918 | 3,567 | 1,349 |
| Edison | |||||||||||
| 333 Thornall Street | Office | 1984 | 2015 | - | 5,542 | 40,762 | - | 5,542 | 40,762 | 46,304 | 247 |
| 343 Thornall Street | Office | 1991 | 2006 | - | 6,027 | 39,101 | 3,349 | 6,027 | 42,450 | 48,477 | 12,243 |
| New Brunswick | |||||||||||
| Richmond Court | Multi-Family | 1997 | 2013 | - | 2,992 | 13,534 | 1,601 | 2,992 | 15,135 | 18,127 | 689 |
| Riverwatch Commons | Multi-Family | 1995 | 2013 | - | 4,169 | 18,974 | 729 | 4,169 | 19,703 | 23,872 | 965 |
| Plainsboro | |||||||||||
| 500 College Road East (c) | Office | 1984 | 1998 | - | 614 | 20,626 | 4,839 | 614 | 25,465 | 26,079 | 11,312 |
| Woodbridge | |||||||||||
| 581 Main Street | Office | 1991 | 1997 | - | 3,237 | 12,949 | 26,135 | 8,115 | 34,206 | 42,321 | 16,730 |
| Monmouth County | |||||||||||
| Freehold | |||||||||||
| 2 Paragon Way | Office | 1989 | 2005 | - | 999 | 4,619 | (864) | 720 | 4,034 | 4,754 | 1,263 |
| 3 Paragon Way | Office | 1991 | 2005 | - | 1,423 | 6,041 | (979) | 1,020 | 5,465 | 6,485 | 1,809 |
| 4 Paragon Way | Office | 2002 | 2005 | - | 1,961 | 8,827 | (3,107) | 1,404 | 6,277 | 7,681 | 1,585 |
| 100 Willow Brook Road | Office | 1988 | 2005 | - | 1,264 | 5,573 | (1,543) | 869 | 4,425 | 5,294 | 1,442 |
| Holmdel | |||||||||||
| 23 Main Street | Office | 1977 | 2005 | 28,541 | 4,336 | 19,544 | 9,133 | 4,336 | 28,677 | 33,013 | 12,775 |
| Middletown | |||||||||||
| One River Center, Building 1 | Office | 1983 | 2004 | 10,721 | 3,070 | 17,414 | 4,065 | 2,451 | 22,098 | 24,549 | 7,840 |
| One River Center, Building 2 | Office | 1983 | 2004 | 12,026 | 2,468 | 15,043 | 3,894 | 2,452 | 18,953 | 21,405 | 5,441 |
| One River Center, Building 3 | Office | 1984 | 2004 | 19,112 | 4,051 | 24,790 | 6,171 | 4,627 | 30,385 | 35,012 | 9,435 |
| Neptune | |||||||||||
| 3600 Route 66 | Office | 1989 | 1995 | - | 1,098 | 18,146 | 11,397 | 1,098 | 29,543 | 30,641 | 11,448 |
| Wall Township | |||||||||||
| 1305 Campus Parkway | Office | 1988 | 1995 | - | 335 | 2,560 | 707 | 291 | 3,311 | 3,602 | 1,618 |
| 1325 Campus Parkway | Office/Flex | 1988 | 1995 | - | 270 | 2,928 | 725 | 270 | 3,653 | 3,923 | 1,914 |
| 1340 Campus Parkway | Office/Flex | 1992 | 1995 | - | 489 | 4,621 | 1,836 | 489 | 6,457 | 6,946 | 3,434 |
| 1345 Campus Parkway | Office/Flex | 1995 | 1997 | - | 1,023 | 5,703 | 1,772 | 1,024 | 7,474 | 8,498 | 3,841 |
| 1350 Campus Parkway | Office | 1990 | 1995 | - | 454 | 7,134 | 1,049 | 454 | 8,183 | 8,637 | 4,016 |
| 1433 Highway 34 | Office/Flex | 1985 | 1995 | - | 889 | 4,321 | 1,655 | 889 | 5,976 | 6,865 | 2,972 |
| MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION | |||||||||||
| REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION | |||||||||||
| December 31, 2015 | |||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||
| SCHEDULE III | |||||||||||
| Gross Amount at Which | |||||||||||
| Costs | Carried at Close of | ||||||||||
| Initial Costs | Capitalized | Period (a) | |||||||||
| Year | Related | Building and | Subsequent | Building and | Accumulated | ||||||
| Property Location | Built | Acquired | Encumbrances | Land | Improvements | to Acquisition | Land | Improvements | Total | Depreciation (b) | |
| 1320 Wyckoff Avenue | Office/Flex | 1986 | 1995 | - | 255 | 1,285 | 291 | 216 | 1,615 | 1,831 | 908 |
| 1324 Wyckoff Avenue | Office/Flex | 1987 | 1995 | - | 230 | 1,439 | 317 | 190 | 1,796 | 1,986 | 853 |
| Morris County | |||||||||||
| Florham Park | |||||||||||
| 325 Columbia Parkway | Office | 1987 | 1994 | - | 1,564 | - | 17,770 | 1,564 | 17,770 | 19,334 | 11,013 |
| Morris Plains | |||||||||||
| 250 Johnson Road | Office | 1977 | 1997 | - | 2,004 | 8,016 | (3,806) | 930 | 5,284 | 6,214 | 4,265 |
| 201 Littleton Road | Office | 1979 | 1997 | - | 2,407 | 9,627 | 3,351 | 2,407 | 12,978 | 15,385 | 5,661 |
| Parsippany | |||||||||||
| 4 Campus Drive | Office | 1983 | 2001 | - | 5,213 | 20,984 | 3,953 | 5,213 | 24,937 | 30,150 | 8,914 |
| 6 Campus Drive | Office | 1983 | 2001 | - | 4,411 | 17,796 | 3,368 | 4,411 | 21,164 | 25,575 | 8,231 |
| 7 Campus Drive | Office | 1982 | 1998 | - | 1,932 | 27,788 | 6,298 | 1,932 | 34,086 | 36,018 | 15,795 |
| 8 Campus Drive | Office | 1987 | 1998 | - | 1,865 | 35,456 | 4,823 | 1,865 | 40,279 | 42,144 | 17,257 |
| 9 Campus Drive | Office | 1983 | 2001 | - | 3,277 | 11,796 | 16,882 | 5,842 | 26,113 | 31,955 | 10,295 |
| 4 Century Drive | Office | 1981 | 2004 | - | 1,787 | 9,575 | (3,432) | 1,086 | 6,844 | 7,930 | 2,188 |
| 5 Century Drive | Office | 1981 | 2004 | - | 1,762 | 9,341 | (3,796) | 953 | 6,354 | 7,307 | 2,109 |
| 6 Century Drive | Office | 1981 | 2004 | - | 1,289 | 6,848 | (631) | 990 | 6,516 | 7,506 | 1,966 |
| 2 Dryden Way | Office | 1990 | 1998 | - | 778 | 420 | 110 | 778 | 530 | 1,308 | 264 |
| 4 Gatehall Drive | Office | 1988 | 2000 | - | 8,452 | 33,929 | 4,055 | 8,452 | 37,984 | 46,436 | 15,223 |
| 2 Hilton Court | Office | 1991 | 1998 | - | 1,971 | 32,007 | 4,434 | 1,971 | 36,441 | 38,412 | 16,638 |
| 1633 Littleton Road | Office | 1978 | 2002 | - | 2,283 | 9,550 | 507 | 2,355 | 9,985 | 12,340 | 6,117 |
| 600 Parsippany Road | Office | 1978 | 1994 | - | 1,257 | 5,594 | 3,102 | 1,257 | 8,696 | 9,953 | 4,631 |
| 1 Sylvan Way | Office | 1989 | 1998 | - | 1,689 | 24,699 | 2,914 | 1,021 | 28,281 | 29,302 | 13,702 |
| 3 Sylvan Way | Office | 1988 | 2015 | - | 5,590 | 4,710 | - | 5,590 | 4,710 | 10,300 | - |
| 5 Sylvan Way | Office | 1989 | 1998 | - | 1,160 | 25,214 | 2,866 | 1,161 | 28,079 | 29,240 | 12,067 |
| 7 Sylvan Way | Office | 1987 | 1998 | - | 2,084 | 26,083 | 1,185 | 2,084 | 27,268 | 29,352 | 11,760 |
| 20 Waterview Boulevard | Office | 1988 | 2009 | 23,989 | 4,500 | 27,246 | (4,222) | 3,816 | 23,708 | 27,524 | 4,895 |
| 35 Waterview Boulevard | Office | 1990 | 2006 | - | 5,133 | 28,059 | 1,161 | 5,133 | 29,220 | 34,353 | 8,100 |
| 5 Wood Hollow Road | Office | 1979 | 2004 | - | 5,302 | 26,488 | 15,538 | 5,302 | 42,026 | 47,328 | 15,275 |
| Passaic County | |||||||||||
| Totowa | |||||||||||
| 1 Center Court | Office/Flex | 1999 | 1999 | - | 270 | 1,824 | 490 | 270 | 2,314 | 2,584 | 990 |
| 2 Center Court | Office/Flex | 1998 | 1998 | - | 191 | - | 2,476 | 191 | 2,476 | 2,667 | 1,089 |
| 11 Commerce Way | Office/Flex | 1989 | 1995 | - | 586 | 2,986 | 1,000 | 586 | 3,986 | 4,572 | 2,086 |
| 20 Commerce Way | Office/Flex | 1992 | 1995 | - | 516 | 3,108 | 111 | 516 | 3,219 | 3,735 | 1,600 |
| 29 Commerce Way | Office/Flex | 1990 | 1995 | - | 586 | 3,092 | 961 | 586 | 4,053 | 4,639 | 1,809 |
| 40 Commerce Way | Office/Flex | 1987 | 1995 | - | 516 | 3,260 | 1,509 | 516 | 4,769 | 5,285 | 2,293 |
| 45 Commerce Way | Office/Flex | 1992 | 1995 | - | 536 | 3,379 | 497 | 536 | 3,876 | 4,412 | 1,940 |
| 60 Commerce Way | Office/Flex | 1988 | 1995 | - | 526 | 3,257 | 507 | 526 | 3,764 | 4,290 | 2,048 |
| 80 Commerce Way | Office/Flex | 1996 | 1996 | - | 227 | - | 1,348 | 227 | 1,348 | 1,575 | 638 |
| 100 Commerce Way | Office/Flex | 1996 | 1996 | - | 226 | - | 1,348 | 226 | 1,348 | 1,574 | 637 |
| 120 Commerce Way | Office/Flex | 1994 | 1995 | - | 228 | - | 1,284 | 229 | 1,283 | 1,512 | 657 |
| 140 Commerce Way | Office/Flex | 1994 | 1995 | - | 229 | - | 1,282 | 228 | 1,283 | 1,511 | 657 |
| 999 Riverview Drive | Office | 1988 | 1995 | - | 476 | 6,024 | 2,766 | 1,102 | 8,164 | 9,266 | 4,367 |
| MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION | |||||||||||
| REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION | |||||||||||
| December 31, 2015 | |||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||
| SCHEDULE III | |||||||||||
| Gross Amount at Which | |||||||||||
| Costs | Carried at Close of | ||||||||||
| Initial Costs | Capitalized | Period (a) | |||||||||
| Year | Related | Building and | Subsequent | Building and | Accumulated | ||||||
| Property Location | Built | Acquired | Encumbrances | Land | Improvements | to Acquisition | Land | Improvements | Total | Depreciation (b) | |
| Somerset County | |||||||||||
| Basking Ridge | |||||||||||
| 222 Mt. Airy Road | Office | 1986 | 1996 | - | 775 | 3,636 | 1,848 | 697 | 5,562 | 6,259 | 2,747 |
| 233 Mt. Airy Road | Office | 1987 | 1996 | - | 1,034 | 5,033 | 1,254 | 915 | 6,406 | 7,321 | 2,677 |
| Bridgewater | |||||||||||
| 440 Route 22 East | Office | 1990 | 2010 | - | 3,986 | 13,658 | 4,940 | 3,986 | 18,598 | 22,584 | 4,638 |
| 721 Route 202/206 | Office | 1989 | 1997 | - | 6,730 | 26,919 | (952) | 5,067 | 27,630 | 32,697 | 14,895 |
| Union County | |||||||||||
| Clark | |||||||||||
| 100 Walnut Avenue | Office | 1985 | 1994 | 18,273 | - | - | 17,801 | 1,822 | 15,979 | 17,801 | 10,958 |
| Cranford | |||||||||||
| 6 Commerce Drive | Office | 1973 | 1994 | - | 250 | - | 1,728 | 250 | 1,728 | 1,978 | 704 |
| 11 Commerce Drive | Office | 1981 | 1994 | - | 470 | - | 5,490 | 470 | 5,490 | 5,960 | 4,644 |
| 12 Commerce Drive | Office | 1967 | 1997 | - | 887 | 3,549 | 1,543 | 887 | 5,092 | 5,979 | 2,566 |
| 14 Commerce Drive | Office | 1971 | 2003 | - | 1,283 | 6,344 | 1,613 | 1,283 | 7,957 | 9,240 | 2,477 |
| 20 Commerce Drive | Office | 1990 | 1994 | - | 2,346 | - | 21,663 | 2,346 | 21,663 | 24,009 | 11,901 |
| 25 Commerce Drive | Office | 1971 | 2002 | - | 1,520 | 6,186 | 864 | 1,520 | 7,050 | 8,570 | 3,239 |
| 65 Jackson Drive | Office | 1984 | 1994 | - | 541 | - | 6,377 | 542 | 6,376 | 6,918 | 4,381 |
| New Providence | |||||||||||
| 890 Mountain Road | Office | 1977 | 1997 | - | 2,796 | 11,185 | (4,798) | 1,719 | 7,464 | 9,183 | 3,212 |
| Rahway | |||||||||||
| Park Square | Multi-Family | 2011 | 2013 | 27,500 | 4,000 | 40,670 | 256 | 4,000 | 40,926 | 44,926 | 2,148 |
| NEW YORK | |||||||||||
| New York County | |||||||||||
| New York | |||||||||||
| 125 Broad Street | Office | 1970 | 2007 | - | 50,191 | 207,002 | (48,039) | 33,829 | 175,325 | 209,154 | 37,852 |
| Westchester County | |||||||||||
| Elmsford | |||||||||||
| 11 Clearbrook Road | Office/Flex | 1974 | 1997 | - | 149 | 2,159 | 602 | 149 | 2,761 | 2,910 | 1,278 |
| 75 Clearbrook Road | Office/Flex | 1990 | 1997 | - | 2,314 | 4,716 | 57 | 2,314 | 4,773 | 7,087 | 2,259 |
| 100 Clearbrook Road | Office | 1975 | 1997 | - | 220 | 5,366 | 1,617 | 220 | 6,983 | 7,203 | 3,352 |
| 125 Clearbrook Road | Office/Flex | 2002 | 2002 | - | 1,055 | 3,676 | (445) | 1,055 | 3,231 | 4,286 | 1,145 |
| 150 Clearbrook Road | Office/Flex | 1975 | 1997 | - | 497 | 7,030 | 2,221 | 497 | 9,251 | 9,748 | 4,104 |
| 175 Clearbrook Road | Office/Flex | 1973 | 1997 | - | 655 | 7,473 | 762 | 655 | 8,235 | 8,890 | 3,863 |
| 200 Clearbrook Road | Office/Flex | 1974 | 1997 | - | 579 | 6,620 | 1,888 | 579 | 8,508 | 9,087 | 3,852 |
| 250 Clearbrook Road | Office/Flex | 1973 | 1997 | - | 867 | 8,647 | 2,395 | 867 | 11,042 | 11,909 | 4,697 |
| 50 Executive Boulevard | Office/Flex | 1969 | 1997 | - | 237 | 2,617 | 441 | 237 | 3,058 | 3,295 | 1,404 |
| 77 Executive Boulevard | Office/Flex | 1977 | 1997 | - | 34 | 1,104 | 212 | 34 | 1,316 | 1,350 | 677 |
| 85 Executive Boulevard | Office/Flex | 1968 | 1997 | - | 155 | 2,507 | 516 | 155 | 3,023 | 3,178 | 1,284 |
| 101 Executive Boulevard | Office | 1971 | 1997 | - | 267 | 5,838 | (3,528) | 101 | 2,476 | 2,577 | 2,468 |
| 300 Executive Boulevard | Office/Flex | 1970 | 1997 | - | 460 | 3,609 | 306 | 460 | 3,915 | 4,375 | 1,802 |
| MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION | |||||||||||
| REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION | |||||||||||
| December 31, 2015 | |||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||
| SCHEDULE III | |||||||||||
| Gross Amount at Which | |||||||||||
| Costs | Carried at Close of | ||||||||||
| Initial Costs | Capitalized | Period (a) | |||||||||
| Year | Related | Building and | Subsequent | Building and | Accumulated | ||||||
| Property Location | Built | Acquired | Encumbrances | Land | Improvements | to Acquisition | Land | Improvements | Total | Depreciation (b) | |
| 350 Executive Boulevard | Office/Flex | 1970 | 1997 | - | 100 | 1,793 | 175 | 100 | 1,968 | 2,068 | 942 |
| 399 Executive Boulevard | Office/Flex | 1962 | 1997 | - | 531 | 7,191 | 163 | 531 | 7,354 | 7,885 | 3,502 |
| 400 Executive Boulevard | Office/Flex | 1970 | 1997 | - | 2,202 | 1,846 | 938 | 2,202 | 2,784 | 4,986 | 1,407 |
| 500 Executive Boulevard | Office/Flex | 1970 | 1997 | - | 258 | 4,183 | 434 | 258 | 4,617 | 4,875 | 2,268 |
| 525 Executive Boulevard | Office/Flex | 1972 | 1997 | - | 345 | 5,499 | 837 | 345 | 6,336 | 6,681 | 3,082 |
| 700 Executive Boulevard | Land Lease | N/A | 1997 | - | 970 | - | - | 970 | - | 970 | - |
| 1 Warehouse Lane (c) | Industrial/Warehouse | 1957 | 1997 | - | 3 | 268 | 233 | 3 | 501 | 504 | 238 |
| 2 Warehouse Lane (c) | Industrial/Warehouse | 1957 | 1997 | - | 4 | 672 | 232 | 4 | 904 | 908 | 378 |
| 3 Warehouse Lane (c) | Industrial/Warehouse | 1957 | 1997 | - | 21 | 1,948 | 363 | 21 | 2,311 | 2,332 | 1,181 |
| 4 Warehouse Lane (c) | Industrial/Warehouse | 1957 | 1997 | - | 84 | 13,393 | 3,405 | 85 | 16,797 | 16,882 | 7,261 |
| 5 Warehouse Lane (c) | Industrial/Warehouse | 1957 | 1997 | - | 19 | 4,804 | 943 | 19 | 5,747 | 5,766 | 2,745 |
| 6 Warehouse Lane (c) | Industrial/Warehouse | 1982 | 1997 | - | 10 | 4,419 | 2,381 | 10 | 6,800 | 6,810 | 2,764 |
| 1 Westchester Plaza | Office/Flex | 1967 | 1997 | - | 199 | 2,023 | 469 | 199 | 2,492 | 2,691 | 1,318 |
| 2 Westchester Plaza | Office/Flex | 1968 | 1997 | - | 234 | 2,726 | 686 | 234 | 3,412 | 3,646 | 1,510 |
| 3 Westchester Plaza | Office/Flex | 1969 | 1997 | - | 655 | 7,936 | 1,343 | 655 | 9,279 | 9,934 | 4,453 |
| 4 Westchester Plaza | Office/Flex | 1969 | 1997 | - | 320 | 3,729 | 1,244 | 320 | 4,973 | 5,293 | 2,455 |
| 5 Westchester Plaza | Office/Flex | 1969 | 1997 | - | 118 | 1,949 | 425 | 118 | 2,374 | 2,492 | 1,219 |
| 6 Westchester Plaza | Office/Flex | 1968 | 1997 | - | 164 | 1,998 | 166 | 164 | 2,164 | 2,328 | 1,012 |
| 7 Westchester Plaza | Office/Flex | 1972 | 1997 | - | 286 | 4,321 | 681 | 286 | 5,002 | 5,288 | 2,187 |
| 8 Westchester Plaza | Office/Flex | 1971 | 1997 | - | 447 | 5,262 | 1,917 | 447 | 7,179 | 7,626 | 3,157 |
| Hawthorne | |||||||||||
| 200 Saw Mill River Road | Office/Flex | 1965 | 1997 | - | 353 | 3,353 | 533 | 353 | 3,886 | 4,239 | 1,831 |
| 1 Skyline Drive | Office | 1980 | 1997 | - | 66 | 1,711 | 210 | 66 | 1,921 | 1,987 | 943 |
| 2 Skyline Drive | Office | 1987 | 1997 | - | 109 | 3,128 | 1,474 | 109 | 4,602 | 4,711 | 2,270 |
| 4 Skyline Drive | Office/Flex | 1987 | 1997 | - | 363 | 7,513 | 2,873 | 363 | 10,386 | 10,749 | 5,320 |
| 5 Skyline Drive | Office/Flex | 1980 | 2001 | - | 2,219 | 8,916 | 1,747 | 2,219 | 10,663 | 12,882 | 4,706 |
| 6 Skyline Drive | Office/Flex | 1980 | 2001 | - | 740 | 2,971 | 1,498 | 740 | 4,469 | 5,209 | 2,380 |
| 7 Skyline Drive | Office | 1987 | 1998 | - | 330 | 13,013 | 2,564 | 330 | 15,577 | 15,907 | 6,690 |
| 8 Skyline Drive | Office/Flex | 1985 | 1997 | - | 212 | 4,410 | 769 | 212 | 5,179 | 5,391 | 2,557 |
| 10 Skyline Drive | Office/Flex | 1985 | 1997 | - | 134 | 2,799 | 732 | 134 | 3,531 | 3,665 | 1,903 |
| 11 Skyline Drive (c) | Office/Flex | 1989 | 1997 | - | - | 4,788 | 761 | - | 5,549 | 5,549 | 2,409 |
| 12 Skyline Drive (c) | Office/Flex | 1999 | 1999 | - | 1,562 | 3,254 | 200 | 1,320 | 3,696 | 5,016 | 1,497 |
| 15 Skyline Drive (c) | Office/Flex | 1989 | 1997 | - | - | 7,449 | 1,060 | - | 8,509 | 8,509 | 3,620 |
| 17 Skyline Drive (c) | Office | 1989 | 1997 | - | - | 7,269 | 1,484 | - | 8,753 | 8,753 | 3,998 |
| Tarrytown | |||||||||||
| 230 White Plains Road | Retail | 1984 | 1997 | - | 124 | 1,845 | 107 | 124 | 1,952 | 2,076 | 919 |
| White Plains | |||||||||||
| 1 Barker Avenue | Office | 1975 | 1997 | - | 208 | 9,629 | 2,590 | 207 | 12,220 | 12,427 | 5,489 |
| 3 Barker Avenue | Office | 1983 | 1997 | - | 122 | 7,864 | 1,848 | 122 | 9,712 | 9,834 | 4,473 |
| 50 Main Street | Office | 1985 | 1997 | - | 564 | 48,105 | 14,554 | 564 | 62,659 | 63,223 | 29,323 |
| 11 Martine Avenue | Office | 1987 | 1997 | - | 127 | 26,833 | 8,561 | 127 | 35,394 | 35,521 | 16,002 |
| 1 Water Street | Office | 1979 | 1997 | - | 211 | 5,382 | 1,341 | 211 | 6,723 | 6,934 | 3,043 |
| Yonkers | |||||||||||
| 100 Corporate Boulevard | Office/Flex | 1987 | 1997 | - | 602 | 9,910 | 1,397 | 602 | 11,307 | 11,909 | 5,342 |
| 200 Corporate Boulevard South | Office/Flex | 1990 | 1997 | - | 502 | 7,575 | 1,472 | 502 | 9,047 | 9,549 | 4,473 |
| 1 Enterprise Boulevard | Land Lease | N/A | 1997 | - | 1,379 | - | 1 | 1,380 | - | 1,380 | - |
| 1 Executive Boulevard | Office | 1982 | 1997 | - | 1,104 | 11,904 | 2,998 | 1,105 | 14,901 | 16,006 | 6,732 |
| MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION | |||||||||||
| REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION | |||||||||||
| December 31, 2015 | |||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||
| SCHEDULE III | |||||||||||
| Gross Amount at Which | |||||||||||
| Costs | Carried at Close of | ||||||||||
| Initial Costs | Capitalized | Period (a) | |||||||||
| Year | Related | Building and | Subsequent | Building and | Accumulated | ||||||
| Property Location | Built | Acquired | Encumbrances | Land | Improvements | to Acquisition | Land | Improvements | Total | Depreciation (b) | |
| 2 Executive Boulevard | Retail | 1986 | 1997 | - | 89 | 2,439 | 107 | 89 | 2,546 | 2,635 | 1,182 |
| 3 Executive Boulevard | Office | 1987 | 1997 | - | 385 | 6,256 | 1,772 | 385 | 8,028 | 8,413 | 3,625 |
| 4 Executive Plaza | Office/Flex | 1986 | 1997 | - | 584 | 6,134 | 1,142 | 584 | 7,276 | 7,860 | 3,294 |
| 6 Executive Plaza | Office/Flex | 1987 | 1997 | - | 546 | 7,246 | 2,206 | 546 | 9,452 | 9,998 | 4,218 |
| 1 Odell Plaza | Office/Flex | 1980 | 1997 | - | 1,206 | 6,815 | 2,221 | 1,206 | 9,036 | 10,242 | 4,058 |
| 3 Odell Plaza | Office | 1984 | 2003 | - | 1,322 | 4,777 | 2,332 | 1,322 | 7,109 | 8,431 | 3,259 |
| 5 Odell Plaza | Office/Flex | 1983 | 1997 | - | 331 | 2,988 | 535 | 331 | 3,523 | 3,854 | 1,760 |
| 7 Odell Plaza | Office/Flex | 1984 | 1997 | - | 419 | 4,418 | 1,249 | 419 | 5,667 | 6,086 | 2,482 |
| CONNECTICUT | |||||||||||
| Fairfield County | |||||||||||
| Stamford | |||||||||||
| 419 West Avenue | Office/Flex | 1986 | 1997 | - | 4,538 | 9,246 | 1,298 | 4,538 | 10,544 | 15,082 | 5,417 |
| 500 West Avenue | Office/Flex | 1988 | 1997 | - | 415 | 1,679 | 654 | 415 | 2,333 | 2,748 | 899 |
| 550 West Avenue | Office/Flex | 1990 | 1997 | - | 1,975 | 3,856 | 185 | 1,975 | 4,041 | 6,016 | 1,956 |
| 600 West Avenue | Office/Flex | 1999 | 1999 | - | 2,305 | 2,863 | 754 | 2,305 | 3,617 | 5,922 | 1,426 |
| 650 West Avenue | Office/Flex | 1998 | 1998 | - | 1,328 | - | 3,524 | 1,328 | 3,524 | 4,852 | 1,601 |
| DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA | |||||||||||
| Washington, | |||||||||||
| 1201 Connecticut Avenue, NW | Office | 1940 | 1999 | - | 14,228 | 18,571 | 6,895 | 14,228 | 25,466 | 39,694 | 11,390 |
| 1400 L Street, NW | Office | 1987 | 1998 | - | 13,054 | 27,423 | 7,910 | 13,054 | 35,333 | 48,387 | 18,841 |
| MARYLAND | |||||||||||
| Prince George’s County | |||||||||||
| Greenbelt | |||||||||||
| Capital Office Park Parcel A | Land | N/A | 2009 | - | 840 | - | 7 | 847 | - | 847 | - |
| 9200 Edmonston Road | Office | 1973/03 | 2006 | 3,793 | 1,547 | 4,131 | (2,484) | 610 | 2,584 | 3,194 | 1,376 |
| 6301 Ivy Lane | Office | 1979/95 | 2006 | - | 5,168 | 14,706 | (9,924) | 2,431 | 7,519 | 9,950 | 1,988 |
| 6303 Ivy Lane | Office | 1980/03 | 2006 | - | 5,115 | 13,860 | (10,097) | 2,436 | 6,442 | 8,878 | 1,584 |
| 6305 Ivy Lane | Office | 1982/95 | 2006 | - | 5,615 | 14,420 | (10,137) | 2,599 | 7,299 | 9,898 | 1,972 |
| 6404 Ivy Lane | Office | 1987 | 2006 | - | 7,578 | 20,785 | (14,343) | 3,437 | 10,583 | 14,020 | 3,376 |
| 6406 Ivy Lane | Office | 1991 | 2006 | - | 7,514 | 21,152 | (14,034) | 3,158 | 11,474 | 14,632 | 2,570 |
| 6411 Ivy Lane | Office | 1984/05 | 2006 | - | 6,867 | 17,470 | (12,445) | 3,216 | 8,676 | 11,892 | 2,452 |
| Lanham | |||||||||||
| 4200 Parliament Place | Office | 1989 | 1998 | - | 2,114 | 13,546 | (6,173) | 774 | 8,713 | 9,487 | 4,258 |
| MASSACHUSETTS | |||||||||||
| Suffolk County | |||||||||||
| Revere | |||||||||||
| Alterra at Overlook Ridge IA | Multi-Family | 2004 | 2013 | - | 9,042 | 50,671 | 879 | 9,042 | 51,550 | 60,592 | 3,859 |
| Alterra at Overlook Ridge II | Multi-Family | 2008 | 2013 | - | 12,055 | 71,409 | 250 | 12,055 | 71,659 | 83,714 | 5,236 |
| Andover Place | Multi-Family | 1988 | 2014 | - | 8,535 | 27,609 | 2,263 | 8,534 | 29,873 | 38,407 | 1,623 |
| Projects Under Development | |||||||||||
| and Developable Land | 45,899 | 204,041 | 237,906 | - | 204,041 | 237,906 | 441,947 | 323 | |||
| Furniture, Fixtures | |||||||||||
| and Equipment | - | - | - | 15,167 | - | 15,167 | 15,167 | 5,418 | |||
| TOTALS | 667,076 | 796,691 | 3,531,729 | 479,298 | 735,696 | 4,072,022 | 4,807,718 | 1,464,482 | |||
(a)The aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes at December 31, 20152018 was approximately $3.3$5.1 billion.
(b)Depreciation of buildings and improvements are calculated over lives ranging from the life of the lease to 40 years.
(c)This property is located on land leased by the Company.
(d)Properties identified as held for sale at December 31, 2018 are excluded.
(e)These costs are net of impairments and valuation allowances recorded, if any.
MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION
NOTE TO SCHEDULE III
Changes in rental properties and accumulated depreciation for the periods ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016 are as follows: (dollars in thousands)
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
| |||
Rental Properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Balance at beginning of year |
| $ | 5,102,844 |
| $ | 4,804,867 |
| $ | 4,807,718 |
|
Additions |
| 686,452 |
| 1,179,365 |
| 819,535 |
| |||
Rental property held for sale |
| (184,233 | ) | (310,089 | ) | (79,200 | ) | |||
Properties sold |
| (238,873 | ) | (538,424 | ) | (695,837 | ) | |||
Impairments |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |||
Retirements/disposals |
| (60,173 | ) | (32,875 | ) | (47,349 | ) | |||
Balance at end of year |
| $ | 5,306,017 |
| $ | 5,102,844 |
| $ | 4,804,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Accumulated Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Balance at beginning of year |
| $ | 1,087,083 |
| $ | 1,332,073 |
| $ | 1,464,482 |
|
Depreciation expense |
| 140,726 |
| 154,343 |
| 151,569 |
| |||
Rental property held for sale |
| (30,404 | ) | (126,503 | ) | (31,792 | ) | |||
Properties sold |
| (39,364 | ) | (217,625 | ) | (204,837 | ) | |||
Repurposed buildings |
| — |
| (22,330 | ) | — |
| |||
Impairments |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |||
Retirements/disposals |
| (60,173 | ) | (32,875 | ) | (47,349 | ) | |||
Balance at end of year |
| $ | 1,097,868 |
| $ | 1,087,083 |
| $ | 1,332,073 |
|
MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION/MACK-CALI REALTY, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE IV — MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE
| 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||
| Rental Properties | ||||||||
| Balance at beginning of year | $ | 4,958,179 | $ | 5,129,933 | $ | 5,379,436 | ||
| Additions | 219,227 | 193,005 | 317,994 | |||||
| Rental property held for sale | - | - | (107,205) | |||||
| Properties sold | (82,015) | (331,181) | (256,335) | |||||
| Impairment charge | (255,849) | - | (149,030) | |||||
| Retirements/disposals | (31,824) | (33,578) | (54,927) | |||||
| Balance at end of year | $ | 4,807,718 | $ | 4,958,179 | $ | 5,129,933 | ||
| Accumulated Depreciation | ||||||||
| Balance at beginning of year | $ | 1,414,305 | $ | 1,400,988 | $ | 1,478,214 | ||
| Depreciation expense | 147,447 | 143,278 | 155,846 | |||||
| Rental property held for sale | - | - | (35,594) | |||||
| Properties sold | (7,517) | (96,383) | (104,196) | |||||
| Impairment charge | (57,929) | - | (38,353) | |||||
| Retirements/disposals | (31,824) | (33,578) | (54,929) | |||||
| Balance at end of year | $ | 1,464,482 | $ | 1,414,305 | $ | 1,400,988 |
As of December 31, 2018
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Face Amount |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| of Mortgages or |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| Interest |
| Interest |
| Final |
| Periodic |
|
|
| Maximum |
| Carrying |
| ||
Type of |
|
|
|
|
| Accrual |
| Payment |
| Maturity |
| Payment |
| Prior |
| Available |
| Amount of |
| ||
Loan/Borrower |
| Description |
| Location |
| Rate |
| Rate |
| Date |
| Term (a) |
| Liens |
| Credit |
| Mortgages |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Mortgage Loan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Borrower A |
| Land |
| Jersey City, NJ |
| 5.85 | % | 5.85 | % | 07/21/19 |
| P&I |
| — |
| $ | 41,695 |
| $ | 45,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | 41,695 |
| $ | 45,242 |
|
(a) P&I = Principal & Interest at maturity
The following table reconciles mortgage loans from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2018 (in thousands):
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| ||
Balance at January 1 |
| $ | 45,734 |
| $ | — |
|
Additions/(repayments) |
|
|
|
|
| ||
New mortgage loan/(repayments) |
| (3,000 | ) | 44,695 |
| ||
Accrued interest |
| 2,508 |
| 1,039 |
| ||
Balance at December 31, |
| $ | 45,242 |
| $ | 45,734 |
|
MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION
MACK-CALI REALTY, L.P.
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Exhibit Title | |||
3.1 | ||||
3.2 | ||
3.3 | ||
3.4 | ||
3.5 | ||
3.6 | ||
3.7 | ||
3.8 | ||
3.9 | ||
3.10 | ||
3.11 | ||
3.12 | ||
3.13 | ||
4.1 | ||
4.2 |
Exhibit | ||
Number | Exhibit Title | |
4.3 | ||
4.4 | ||
4.5 | ||
4.6 |
4.7 | ||
4.8 | ||
4.9 | ||
4.10 | ||
4.11 | ||
4.12 | ||
4.13 | ||
4.14 | ||
4.15 | ||
4.16 | ||
4.17 | ||
4.18 |
Exhibit | ||
Number | Exhibit Title | |
10.1 | ||
10.2 | ||
10.3# | ||
10.4# | ||
10.5# | ||
10.6# | ||
10.7# | ||
10.8# | ||
10.9# | ||
10.10# | ||
10.11# | ||
10.12# | ||
10.13# | ||
10.14# |
10.15# | ||
10.16# | ||
10.17# | ||
10.18# | ||
10.19# |
Exhibit | ||
Number | Exhibit Title | |
10.20# | ||
10.21# | ||
10.22# | ||
10.23# | ||
10.24 | ||
10.25 | ||
10.26 | ||
10.27 | ||
10.28 | ||
10.29 | ||
10.30 | ||
10.31 |
Exhibit | ||
Number | Exhibit Title | |
10.32 | ||
10.33# | ||
10.34# | ||
10.35# | ||
10.36 | ||
10.37 |
10.38# | ||
10.39 | ||
10.40# | ||
10.41# | ||
10.42# |
Exhibit | ||
Number | Exhibit Title | |
10.43# | ||
10.44# | ||
10.45# | ||
10.46# | ||
10.47# | ||
10.48# | ||
10.49 | ||
10.50 |
10.51 | ||
10.52 | ||
10.53 | ||
10.54 | ||
10.55# | ||
10.56# |
Exhibit | ||
Number | Exhibit Title | |
10.57# | ||
10.58# | ||
10.59 | ||
10.60 | ||
10.61 | ||
10.62 | ||
10.63 | ||
10.64 | ||
10.65 | ||
10.66 | ||
10.67 | ||
10.68 | ||
10.69 |
Exhibit | ||
Number | Exhibit Title | |
10.70 | ||
10.71# | ||
10.72# | ||
10.73# | ||
10.74# | ||
10.75# | ||
10.76# | ||
10.77# | ||
10.78# | ||
10.79# | ||
10.80# | ||
10.81# | ||
10.82 | ||
10.83 | ||
10.84# |
Exhibit | ||
Number | Exhibit Title | |
12.1* | ||
12.2* | ||
21.1* | ||
21.2* | ||
23.1* | ||
23.2* | ||
31.1* | ||
31.2* | ||
31.3* | ||
31.4* | ||
32.1* | ||
32.2* | ||
101.1* | The following financial statements from Mack-Cali Realty |
* filed herewith
# management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION
MACK-CALI REALTY, L.P.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Mack-Cali Realty Corporation | ||||
(Registrant) | ||||
Date: February 20, 2019 | By: | /s/ Michael J. DeMarco | ||
Michael J. DeMarco | ||||
Chief Executive Officer | ||||
(principal executive officer) | ||||
Date: February 20, 2019 | By: | /s/ David J. Smetana | ||
David J. Smetana | ||||
Chief Financial Officer | ||||
(principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) | ||||
Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. | ||||
(Registrant) | ||||
By: | Mack-Cali Realty Corporation | |||
its General Partner | ||||
Date: February 20, 2019 | By: | /s/ Michael J. DeMarco | ||
Michael J. DeMarco | ||||
Chief Executive Officer | ||||
(principal executive officer) | ||||
Date: February 20, 2019 | By: | /s/ David J. Smetana | ||
David J. Smetana | ||||
Chief Financial Officer | ||||
(principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) | ||||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
Name | Title | Date | ||
/s/ WILLIAM L. MACK | Chairman of the Board | February 20, 2019 | ||
William L. Mack | ||||
/s/ MICHAEL J. DEMARCO | Chief Executive Officer and Director | February 20, 2019 | ||
Michael J. DeMarco | (principal executive officer) | |||
/s/ DAVID J. SMETANA | Chief Financial Officer | February 20, 2019 | ||
David J. Smetana | (principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) | |||
/s/ ALAN S. BERNIKOW | Director | February 20, 2019 | ||
Alan S. Bernikow | ||||
/s/ KENNETH M. DUBERSTEIN | Director | February 20, 2019 | ||
Kenneth M. Duberstein | ||||
/s/ NATHAN GANTCHER | Director | February 20, 2019 | ||
Nathan Gantcher | ||||
/s/ DAVID S. MACK | Director | February 20, 2019 | ||
David S. Mack | ||||
/s/ ALAN G. PHILIBOSIAN | Director | February 20, 2019 | ||
Alan G. Philibosian | ||||
/s/ IRVIN D. REID | Director | February 20, 2019 | ||
Irvin D. Reid | ||||
/s/ REBECCA ROBERTSON | Director | February 20, 2019 | ||
Rebecca Robertson | ||||
/s/ VINCENT TESE | Director | February 20, 2019 | ||
Vincent Tese |