UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013

2015

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-25779

 

THESTREET, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

  

Delaware 06-1515824
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

14 Wall Street, 15th Floor
New York, New York
 10005
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (212) 321-5000

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which the Securities are Registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share Nasdaq Global Market

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

 

 

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes£¨ NoSx

 

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes£¨ NoSx

 

Indicate by a check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YesSx No£¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant as required to submit and post such files). Yesx No£¨

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.£¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer£Accelerated filer£xNon-accelerated filer£Smaller reporting companyx

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes£¨ Nox

 

The aggregate market value of the Registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant (assuming, for the sole purpose of this calculation, that all directors and executive officers of the Registrant are “affiliates”), based upon the closing price of the Registrant’s common stock on June 30, 20132015 as reported by Nasdaq, was approximately $59 million.

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

 

Title of Each ClassNumber of Shares Outstanding as of February 24, 2014March 3, 2016
Common Stock, par value $0.01 par value34,308,13035,229,680

 

Documents Incorporated By Reference

 

Part III of this Form 10-K incorporates by reference certain information from the Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement for its 20142016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Report.

 

 

THESTREET, INC.
20132015 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 Page
  
PART I 
  
Item 1.Business1
Item 1A.Risk Factors7
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments19
Item 2.Properties19
Item 3.Legal Proceedings19
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures19
   
PART II 
  
Item 5.Market For Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities20
Item 6.Selected Financial Data2122
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations23
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk3940
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data3940
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure3940
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures3941
Item 9B.Other Information4044
   
PART III 
  
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance4144
Item 11.Executive Compensation4144
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters4144
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence4245
Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services4245
   
PART IV 
  
Item 15.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules4345
SIGNATURES46

ii

ii 

THESTREET, INC.
20132015 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

 

PART I

 

Item 1. Business.

 

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements – all statements contained in this Report that are not descriptions of historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results could differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, which include, but are not limited to, the factors set forth under the heading “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Report, and in other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time. Certain forward-looking statements may be identified by terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “forecasts,” “potential,” or “continue” or similar terms or the negative of these terms. All statements relating to our plans, strategies and objectives are deemed forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. We have no obligation to update these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.

 

Overview

 

TheStreet, Inc., together with its wholly owned subsidiaries (“TheStreet”, “we”, “us” or the “Company”),is a leading digital financial media company focused on the financial and mergers and acquisitions environment. The Company’s collection of digital services provides users, subscribers and advertisers with a variety of content and tools through a range of online, social media, tablet and mobile channels.Our mission is to provide investors and advisors with actionable ideas from the world of investing, finance and business, and dealmakers with sophisticated analysis of the mergers and acquisitions environment, in order to break down information barriers, level the playing field and help all individuals and organizations grow their wealth. Withwealth.With a robust suite of digital services, TheStreet offers the tools and insights needed to make informed decisions about earning, investing, saving and spending money. Since its inception in 1996, TheStreet believes it has distinguished itself from other digitalfinancial media companies with its journalistic excellence, unbiased approach and interactive multimedia coverage of the financial markets, economy, industry trends, investment and financial planning.

 

We pioneered online publishing of business and investment information through our creation ofTheStreet, which launched in 1996 as a paid subscription financial news and commentary Website. Today,TheStreet is our flagship advertising-supported property, a leading site in its category and a source of subscribers to a variety of our paid subscription products. Our subscription products which includeRealMoney,RealMoney Pro, Options Profits, Actions Alerts PLUS,Breakout Stocks,andStocks Under $10are designed to address the needs of investors with various areas of interest and increasing levels of financial sophistication,including fledgling investors, consumers interested in personal finance guidance, long-term and short-term active investors, day and swing traders, and fundamental, technical and options traders. Our RateWatch business publishes bank rate market information on a subscription basis to financial institutions, government agencies, educational researchers and government agencies. Thecommercial organizations.The Deal, LLC (“The Deal”), our institutional services platform, provides dealmakers, advisers and institutional investors with sophisticated analysis of thedirector and officer profiles, relationship capital management services, and transactional information pertaining to mergers and acquisitions and other changes in the corporate control environment.

1

Subscription Services

 

Subscription services revenue is comprised of subscriptions, licenses and fees for access to securities investment information, stock market commentary, rate services, director and officer profiles, relationship capital management services, and transactional information pertaining to the mergers and acquisitions and other changes in the corporate control environment. Subscription services contributed 82% of our total revenue in 2015, as compared to 79% in 2014 and 80% in 2013. The increase is primarily the result of the acquisition of Management Diagnostics Limited in October 2014.

 

We believe we were one of the first companies to successfully create a large scale, consumer-focused, digital subscription services content business. We believe we have been able to successfully buildsustain our subscription services business because we have established a 20-year track record for over 17 years of providing high quality, independent investing ideas that have produced financial value for our readers. We believe our track record provides us with a competitive advantage and we will seek to enhance the value of our leading brand and our ability to monetize that value.

 

In addition to our consumer-focused subscription products, which includeRealMoney,RealMoney Pro, Options Profits, Actions Alerts PLUS,Breakout Stocks,TheStreet Quant Ratings,andStocks Under $10, our subscription services business also includes information and transactional services revenue from RateWatch and The Deal.

 

RateWatchmaintains a constantly-updated database of financial ratedeposit, loan and fee rate data collected from more than 95,000over 100,000 financial institutions (at the branch level), including certificate of deposit, money market account, savings account, checking account, home mortgage, home equity loan, credit cardinstitutions. This historical and auto loan rates. This informationreal-time rate data is licensed to financial institutions, and government agencies, on a subscription basis,educational researchers and commercial organizations. Data is provided in the form offormats ranging from standard rate templates to large raw data files for use with third party analytical tools. The RateWatch product line also includes banking-related product and custom reports that outline the competitive landscape for our clients. The data collected by RateWatch also serves as the foundation for the information available onBankingMyWay, an advertising-supported Website that enables consumers to search for the most competitive localfee comparisons, financial strength reporting, educational webinars, mystery shopping and national rates.consumer and financial institution surveys.

 

In September 2012, the Company acquired The Deal, LLC (“The Deal”) as it expanded its subscription services with a new focus on institutional investors, in addition to retail investors. Founded in 1999 asThe Daily Dealprint newspaper, The Deal transformed its business into a digital subscription platform that delivers sophisticated coverage of theon changes in corporate control, including mergers and acquisitions, environment, primarily throughprivate equity, corporate activism and restructuring. The Deal Pipeline, a leading provider of transactional information services. The Deal Pipeline was created for organizations seeking to generate deal flow, improve client intelligence and enhance market knowledge.  It provides full access to proprietary commentary, analysis and data produced every day by The Deal’s editors and journalists and can be customized based on each client’s job function, deal focus and workflow and delivered straight to a mobile device or existing corporate platform.

In April 2013, the Company acquiredThe DealFlow Report, The Life Settlements Reportand the PrivateRaise database from DealFlow Media, IncInc. to further broaden the information and services available to institutional investors. These newsletters and database, and the employees providing their content, have been incorporated into The Deal.

2

Additionally, in October 2014, the Company acquired Management Diagnostics Limited (“MDL”), a privately held company headquartered in London, England to expand the Company’s international operations and further the Company’s transition from primarily serving retail investors to also becoming an indispensable data and business intelligence source for institutional clients. Founded in 1999, MDL is the owner of BoardEx, an institutional relationship capital management database and platform. Clients, including investment banks, consultancies, executive search firms, law firms and academia use BoardEx to leverage their relationships and facilitate business and corporate development initiatives. MDL’s products and services, and the employees providing these products and services have been incorporated into The Deal.

 

Our subscription services revenue also includes revenue generated from syndication and licensing of data from TheStreet Ratings (“Ratings”), which tracks the risk-adjusted performance of more than 20,000 mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and more than 4,000 stocks. Subscription services contributed 80% of our total revenue in 2013, as compared to 73% in 2012 and 67% in 2011.

 

Media

 

Media revenue is comprised of fees charged for the placement of advertising and sponsorships within TheStreet and its affiliated properties, our subscription and institutional services,event and other miscellaneous revenue. Media contributed 18% of our total revenue in 2015, as compared to 21% in 2014 and 20% in 2013. The decrease is primarily the result of the acquisition of MDL in October 2014, which added to the Company’s subscription services revenue.

2

Our advertising-supported properties, which includeTheStreet,MainStreet, Stockpickr, andReal Money, attract one of the largest and most affluent audiences of any digital publisher in our content vertical.TheStreet, with its enviable track record as a leading and distinctive digital voice in the financial category, is regarded as a must-buy for most of our core online brokerage advertisers and a highly effective means for other financial services companies and non-endemic advertisers to communicate with our engaged, affluent audience. Our direct sales team sells the full capabilities of TheStreet and its affiliated properties via sponsorships, custom programs, video, mobile, newsletters, audience targeting, native advertising, social amplification and distribution as well as programmatic direct and RTB.real time bidding.

 

Our media revenue also includes revenue generated from syndication and licensing of data as well as other miscellaneous, non-subscription related sources. Media contributed 20% of our total revenue in 2013, as compared to 27% in 2012 and 33% in 2011.

 

Marketing

 

We pursue a variety of sales and marketing initiatives to sell subscriptions to our subscription services, increase traffic to our sites, license our content, expose our brands, and build our customer databases. These initiatives may include promoting our services through online, email, social, radio and television marketing,direct mail, telemarketing and establishing content syndication and subscription distribution relationships with leading companies. Our in-house online marketing and creative design teams create a variety of marketing campaigns, which are then implemented by our technical and operations team and by third-party service providers. We also have a reporting and analysis group that analyzes traffic and subscription data to determine the effectiveness of the campaigns. We also sell our subscription services through a direct sales force to institutional clients.

 

We also use content syndication and subscription distribution arrangements to capitalize on the cost efficiencies of online delivery and create additional value from content we already have produced for our own properties. By syndicating our content to other leading Websites to host on their own sites, we expose our brands and top-quality writing to millions of potential users. In one type of syndication arrangement, we provide leading Websites in our vertical, including Yahoo! Finance, AOL Daily Finance, Marketwatch and MSN Money, with selected content to host along with additional article headlines that these partners display on their stock quote result pages, in both instances providing links back to our site. This type of arrangement exposes new audiences to our brands and content and generates additional traffic to our sites, creating the opportunity for us to increase our advertising revenue and subscription sales.

 

3

We are intensely focused on generatingseek to generate additional visitors to our sites through search engine optimization efforts, in order to increase the visibility of our content on search engines such as Google Search, Yahoo and Microsoft’s Bing, and through efforts to increase our presence on a variety of social media platforms, such as Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter. We have been active in developing and distributing mobile and tablet applications to deliver our content to new audiences. Finally, we are focusedfocus on increasing the engagement our visitors have with our sites, measured by visits per visitor, page views per visit and by time spent on site, and we continuously seek to improve the experience our sites offer.

 

In addition, we obtain exposure through other media outlets who cite our writers and our stories or who invite our writers to appear on segments. In 2013,2015, we were mentioned or featured in reports by major news/media outlets, includingThe Wall Street Journal,USA Today, Los Angeles Times and The New York ObserverTimes. Many of our writers and analysts provided key market commentary and consumer advice for CNBC, CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS, Fox and other national and local news organizations.

3

Competition

 

Our services face intense competition from other providers of business, personal finance, investing and ratings content, including:

 

·online services or Websites focused on business, personal finance or investing, such asThe Wall Street Journal Digital Network,CNN Money, Forbes.com, Reuters.com,Bloomberg.com,CNBC.comSeeking Alpha, Business Insider, andBusiness Insider,CNBC.com,as well as financial portals such as Yahoo! Finance, AOL Daily Finance and MSN Money;

 

·publishers and distributors of traditional media focused on business, personal finance or investing, including print and radio, such asThe Wall Street Journal and financial talk radio programs, and business television networks such as Bloomberg, CNBC and the Fox Business Channel;

 

·investment newsletter publishers, such asTheMotley Fool,andStansberry & Associates Investment Research andInvestorPlace Media;

 

·other providers of business intelligence on mergers and acquisitions, restructurings and financings, such asBloombergandMergermarket Group; and

 

·established ratings services, such as Standard & Poor’s, Morningstar and Lipper, with respect to our Ratings products, and rate database providers such as Informa and SNL Kagan,Financial, with respect to our RateWatch products.products; and

·other providers of director, officer and dealmaker data, including Bloomberg, S&P Capital IQ, Dow Jones, The New York Stock Exchange, LexisNexis, Relationship Science, and Thomson Reuters.

 

Many of these competitors have significantly greater scale and resources than we do. Additionally, advances in technology have reduced the cost of production and online distribution of written, audio and video content, which has resulted in the proliferation of small, often self-published providers of free content, such as bloggers.

 

We believe that advertisers and agencies often look to independent measurement data such as that provided by comScore, Inc., an independent Web measurement company (“comScore”), in order to gain a sense of the performance of various sites, in relation to their peer category, when determining where to allocate advertising dollars.

 

According to a November 2013 survey by comScore Inc., an independent Web measurement company (“comScore”),during the fourth quarter of 2015, TheStreet ranks:

4

  

·#1 Website with readers having a portfolio value over $250,000;$1 million;
·#1#2 Website with readers having a portfolio valuehousehold income over $500,000;$75,000; and
·#1 Website with readers checking stock quotes multiple times each day.quotes.

 

We compete with these other content providers for customers, including subscribers, readers and viewers of our video content, for advertising revenue, and for employees and contributors to our services. Our ability to compete successfully depends on many factors, including the quality, originality, timeliness, insightfulness and trustworthiness of our content and that of our competitors, the reputations of our contributors and our brands, the success of our recommendations and research, our ability to introduce products and services that keep pace with new investing trends, the experience we and our competitors offer our users and the effectiveness of our sales and marketing efforts.

 

Infrastructure, Operations and Technology

 

Our main technological infrastructure consists of proprietary and Drupal-based content management, subscription management, Ratings models, and e-commerce systems. We also utilize the

4

services of third-party cloud computing providers, more specifically Amazon Web Services, as well as content delivery networks such as Akamai Technologies,Fastly, to help us efficiently distribute our content to our customers. Our RateWatch systems consist of proprietary and commercial software hosted internally. Our operations are dependent in part on our ability, and that of our third-party cloud computing providers, to keep our systems up to rapidly evolving modern standards and to protect our systems against damage from fire, earthquakes, power loss, telecommunications failure, break-ins, computer viruses, hacker attacks, terrorist attacks and other events beyond our control.

 

Our content-management systems are based on proprietary software, Drupal and the DrupalKaltura Content Management System.Systems. They allow our stories, videos and data to be prepared for distribution online to a large audience. These systems enable us to distribute and syndicate our content economically and efficiently to multiple destinations in a variety of technical formats.

 

Our subscription-management system is based on proprietary software and allows us to communicate automatically with readers during their free-trial and subscription periods. The system is capable of yielding a variety of customized subscription offers to potential subscribers, using various communication methods and platforms.

 

Our e-commerce system is based on proprietary software and controls user access to a wide array of service offerings. The system automatically controls aspects of online daily credit card billing, based upon user-selected billing terms. All financial revenue-recognition reports are automatically generated, providing detailed reporting on all account subscriptions. This generally allows a user to sign up and pay for an online service for his or her selected subscription term (e.g., annual or monthly).

 

Our Ratings business is based on a set of proprietary statistical models that use key financial metrics and indicators to rate stocks, mutual funds and ETFs. The data and output from these models are managed and stored within a content management system and updated daily based on changes in markets. The system is capable of search-based syndication of customized ratings data that can be distributed in a variety of technical formats. Our RateWatch business uses proprietary software to input and extract from a commercial database platform financial rate data that we collect through the efforts of our large data collection team. The RateWatch proprietary software automatically generates and distributes customer reports based on our data.

 

5

Intellectual Property

 

To protect our intellectual property (“IP”), we rely on a combination of trademarks, copyrights, trade secretpatent protection, confidentiality agreements and various other contractual arrangements with our employees, affiliates, customers, strategic partners and others. We own several trademark registrations and copyrights, and have pending trademark and patent applications for other marks in the United States. In addition, our Code of Conduct and Business Ethics, employee handbook, and other internal policies seek to protect our IP against misappropriation, infringement, and unfair competition. We also have one pending patent application. Additionally, weutilize various tools to police the Internet forto monitor piracy and unauthorized use of our copyrightedcontent. Finally, whether we are contracting out our IP or licensing third-party content that has been republished without our permission andand/or technology, we may aggressively pursue the poster, the site featuring the content, and any ISP in orderincorporate contractual provisions to protect our rights.

To protect our intellectual property rights as well as protect against infringement claims in our relationships with business partners, we generally look to incorporate contractual provisions protecting our intellectual propertyIP and seekingseek indemnification for any third-party infringement claims.

However, we cannot provide any guarantee that the protective steps we have taken mayforegoing provisions will be inadequateadequate to deter misappropriationprotect us from third-party claims or that these provisions will prevent the theft of our proprietary information. WeIP, as we may be unable to detect the unauthorized use of, or take appropriate steps to enforce, our intellectual propertyIP rights. Failure to adequately protect our intellectual property could harm our brand, devalue our proprietary content, and affect our ability to compete effectively.

5

Some of our products and services incorporate licensed third-party content and/or technology. In these license agreements, the licensors have generally agreed to defend, indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to Further, any third-party claim of infringement. We cannot provide any guarantee that the foregoing provisions will be adequate to protect us from infringement claims. Any infringement claims, even if not meritorious, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources on our part, which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

Customers; SeasonalityCustomers

 

InFor the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, no single customer accounted for 10% or more of our consolidated revenue.

Seasonality

There does not tend to be significant seasonality to our subscription services revenue. There is seasonality in our advertising revenue, as spending by our customers generally tends to be higher in the fourth calendar quarter as compared to other quarters, and the first and third calendar quarters often are lower than the other quarters.

 

Segments

We operate in one reportable segment. For a discussion of revenue, net income and total assets, see Part II, Items 7 and 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Geography

 

During 2013, 20122015 and 2011,2014, significantly all of our long-lived assets were located in the United States and Europe. During 2013 all of our long-lived assets were located in the United States. Substantially all of our revenue in 2013, 20122015, 2014 and 20112013 was generated from customers in the United States.States and Europe. For a discussion of the risks related to foreign operations, see the information in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading "Risk Factors" under the captions "Our foreign operations subject us to a number of operating, economic, political and regulatory risks that may have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations" and “Foreign exchange variability could adversely affect our consolidated operating results.”

6

 

Employees

 

As of December 31, 2013,2015, the Company had 276651 employees. The Company has never had a work stoppage and none of its employees are represented under collective bargaining agreements. The Company considers its relations with its employees to be good.

 

Government Regulation

 

We are subject to government regulation in connection with securities laws and regulations applicable to all publicly-owned companies, as well as laws and regulations applicable to businesses generally, including privacy regulations and taxes levied adopted at the local, state, national and international levels and taxes levied at the state level.levels. In recent years, consumer protection regulations, particularly in connection with the Internet,privacy matters, has become more aggressive,expansive, and we expect that new laws and regulations will continue to be enacted at the local, state, national and international levels. Such new legislation, alone or combined with increasingly aggressiveincreased enforcement of existing laws, could have a material adverse effect on our future operating performance and business due to increased compliance costs.

 

Available Information

 

We were founded in 1996 as a limited liability company, and reorganized as a C corporation in 1998. We consummated our initial public offering in 1999 and we file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Our Corporate Website is located at http://www.t.st. We make available free of charge, on or through our Website, our annual, quarterly and current reports, and any amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing such reports with the SEC. Information contained on our Website is not part of this Report or any other report filed with the SEC.

 

You may download the information that we file with the SEC at www.sec.gov.

6

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

 

Investing in our Common Stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the following risk factors, as well as the other information in this Report, before deciding whether to invest in our Common Stock. Our business, prospects, financial condition or operating results could be materially adversely affected by any of these risks, as well as other risks not currently known to us or that we currently consider immaterial. The trading price of our Common Stock could decline as a result of any of these risks, and you could lose part or all of your investment in our Common Stock. When deciding whether to invest in our Common Stock, you should also refer to the other information in this Report, including our consolidated financial statements and related notes and the information contained in Part II, Item 7 of this Report entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” You should carefully consider the following material risks we face. If any of the following risks occur, our business, results of operations or financial condition could be materially adversely affected. Please also refer to the Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements appearing in Part I, Item 1 of this Report.

 

Our quarterly financial results may fluctuate and our future revenue is difficult to forecast.

 

Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate significantly in the future as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are outside our control, including:

 

·the level of interest and investment in the stock marketindividual stocks versus index funds and exchange-traded funds (ETF) by both individual and institutional investors, which can impact our ability to sell subscriptionspremium subscription products and to sell advertising;

7

·the number of individual and institutional investors investing in individual stocks versus index funds and exchange-traded funds (ETF), which would impact demand for our products;

·theoverall willingness of potential and existing customers to pay for content distributed over the Internet, where a large quantity of content is available for free;

 

·demand and pricing for advertising on our Websites, which is affected by advertising budget cycles of our customers, general economic conditions, demand for advertising on the Internet generally, the supply of advertising inventory in the market and actions by our competitors;

 

·subscription price reductions attributable to decreased demand or increased competition;

 

·the value to potential and existing customers of the investing ideas we offer in our subscription services and the performance of those ideas relative to appropriate benchmarks;

 

·new products or services introduced by our competitors;

 

·content distribution fees production, specifically video, traffic acquisition costs, and/or other costs;

 

·for our business-to-business products such as The Deal, BoardEx and Private Raise, the volatility in mergers and acquisitions, restructuring and financing activities;

 

·for RateWatch, the volatility of interest rates and bank fees and the underlying demand for banking products by consumers;

 

·costs or lost revenue associated with system downtime affecting the Internet generally or our Websites in particular; and

 

·general economic and financial market conditions.conditions; and
·our ability to attract and retain editorial and managerial talent.
7

We had a net loss in each of our last three fiscal yearyears 2015, 2014 and 2013, and have incurred net losses for most years of our history. We may not generate net income in future periods. We forecast our current and future expense levels based on expected revenue and our operating plans.plans, and expect to increase our investments in our business this year with significant strategic investments in technology, marketing and content. These investments are intended to improve our products offered to both consumers and businesses but may not have the desired effect or impact. Because of the above factors, as well as other material risks we face, as described elsewhere in this Report, our operating results may be below the expectations of public market analysts and investors in some future quarters. In such an event, the price of our Common Stock is likely to decline.

 

Key content contributors, particularly James J. Cramer, are important to our current retail investor product offerings.

 

Some of our products, particularly our editorial subscription products, reflect the talents, efforts, personalities, investing skills and portfolio returns, and reputations of their respective writers. As a result, the services of these key content contributors, including our co-founder James J. Cramer, form an essential element of our subscription revenue.

In November 2013, we entered into a new four-year employment agreement with Mr. Cramer, our founder and chief markets commentator, which will expire on December 31, 2017, unless renewed. This employment agreement provides for higher payments than the previous one, including a payment of royalties tied to products associated with Mr. Cramer, and includes a minimum guarantee of $2.5 million per year, a licensing fee of $300,000 per year, as well as reimbursement for certain expenses annually. In addition to his content contributions, we benefit from Mr. Cramer’s popularity and visibility, which have provided public awareness of our services and introduced our content to new audiences. For example, Mr. Cramer hosts CNBC’s finance television show,Mad Money. If, however, Mr. Cramer no longer appeared on the show or the program was cancelled for any reason, it could negatively impact his public profile and visibility, and in turn, our subscription products. WeFurther, the continued value of Mr. Cramer’s contributions could be materially adversely affected if Mr. Cramer were to otherwise lose popularity with the public. While we believe we greatly benefit from Mr. Cramer’s contributions and his media exposure for other companies, we can give no assurance that our relationship with Mr. Cramer will lead to higher revenues from our subscription products or improve our organic growth.

8

In addition to Mr. Cramer, we seek to compensate and provide incentives for these key content contributors through competitive salaries, stock ownership and bonus plans and/or royalty arrangements, and we have entered into employment or contributor agreements with certain of them, including Mr. Cramer. In November 2013,them. If we entered into a new four-year employment agreement with Mr. Cramer, which will expire on December 31, 2017, unless renewed. As compared to his prior employment agreement, the new employment agreement provides for payment of an increased royalty rate to Mr. Cramer, and therefore results in higher cost to us. While we believe we greatly benefit from Mr. Cramer’s contributions, we can give no assurance that this will lead to higher revenues from our subscriprion products or improve our organic growth. Furthermore, we may not be ableare unable to retain key content contributors, or, should we lose the services of one or more of our key content contributors to death, disability, loss of reputation or other reason, or should their popularity diminish or their investing returns and investing ideas fail to meet or exceed benchmarks and investor expectations, we may fail to attract new content contributors acceptable to readers of our collection of Websites and editorial subscription products. TheThus, the loss of services of one or more of our key content contributors could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We have recently experienced several changes in our management team and will need to recruit, hire and retain additional executive talent which may cause disruption in our business.

We have recently had significant changes in executive leadership. In February 2016, Elisabeth DeMarse resigned as our President and Chief Executive Officer and as a member of our Board of Directors. In connection with Ms. DeMarse’s resignation, Lawrence S. Kramer, the Chairman of our Board of Directors who had recently joined the Board in October 2015 and was named Chairman in December 2015, was appointed as our Interim President and Chief Executive Officer in February 2016. We are currently conducting a search for a full-time replacement. Additionally, in January 2016, Eric Lundberg joined the Company as Chief Financial Officer, filling the role vacated by John C. Ferrara in October 2015. Other recent departures at the end of 2015 include our Chief Business Officer, Erwin Eichmann, and our General Counsel, Vanessa J. Soman.

These changes and the short time interval in which they have occurred have been disruptive to our employees and may add to the risk of control failures, including a failure in the effective operation of our internal control over financial reporting or our disclosure controls and procedures. Additionally, it may take time to hire new executives and for the new management team to become sufficiently familiar with our business and each other to effectively develop and implement our business strategies. Accordingly, disruption to our organization as a result of executive management transition could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Changes to company strategy, which can often times occur with the appointment of new executives, can create uncertainty, may negatively impact our ability to execute quickly and effectively, and may ultimately be unsuccessful. In addition, executive leadership transition periods are often difficult and tension can result from changes in strategy and management style. Management transition inherently causes some loss of institutional knowledge, which can negatively affect strategy and execution. Until we integrate new personnel, and unless they are able to succeed in their positions, we may be unable to successfully manage and grow our business, and our results of operations and financial condition could suffer as a result. In addition, uncertainty regarding the timing or effectiveness of our management transition process may also harm our reputation and adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.

 

Our business depends on attracting and retaining capable management and operating personnel.

 

Our ability to compete in the marketplace depends upon our ability to recruit and retain other key employees, including executives to operate our business, technology personnel to run our publishing, commerce, communications, video and other systems, direct marketers to sell subscriptions to our premium services and salespersons to sell our advertising inventory and subscriptions. In 2012 we began management changes, which included hiring a new Chief Executive Officer and other senior managers. In 2013 we hired a new Chief Financial Officer and a new General Counsel.

 

Several, but not all, of our key employees are bound by agreements containing non-competition provisions. There can be no assurances that these arrangements with key employees will provide adequate protections to us or will not result in further management changes that would have material adverse impact on us. In addition, we may incur increased costs to continue to compensate our key executives, as well as other employees, through competitive salaries, stock ownership and bonus plans. Nevertheless, we can make no assurances that these programs will allow us to retain our new management or key employees or hire new employees. The loss of one or more of our key employees, or our inability to attract experienced and qualified replacements, could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The terms of our Series B Preferred Stock include a substantial liquidation preference, as well as significant control rights.

TCV VI, L.P. and TCV Member Fund, L.P., (together “TCV”) hold all of the shares of our Series B Preferred Stock (“Series B Preferred Stock”), which were originally issued in a November 2007 private placement. These shares are convertible into an aggregate of 3,856,942 shares of our Common Stock, at a conversion price of $14.26 per share, or approximately 10% of our outstanding Common Stock. However, the holders of our Series B Preferred Stock are entitled to a $55 million liquidation preference upon liquidation or dissolution of the Company or upon any change of control event. Accordingly, unless otherwise agreed to by TCV, the liquidation preference entitles the holders of our Series B Preferred Stock to a substantial premium in the event of a sale of the Company, which not only makes it more difficult for a third party to acquire the Company, but also may result in the holders of our Common Stock receiving significantly less than their pro rata share of the proceeds in the event we are acquired.

The holders of the Series B Preferred Stock have the right to vote on any matter submitted to a vote of the stockholders of the Company and are entitled to vote that number of votes equal to the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of such holders’ shares of Series B Preferred Stock. In addition, TCV has the right to appoint one person to our board of directors, although they are not currently exercising this right. 

89

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of Series B Preferred Stock is necessary for the Company to take any of the following actions: (i) authorize, create or issue any class or classes of our capital stock ranking senior to, or on a parity with (as to dividends or upon a liquidation event) the Series B Preferred Stock or any securities exercisable or exchangeable for, or convertible into, any now or hereafter authorized capital stock ranking senior to, or on a parity with (as to dividends or upon a liquidation event) the Series B Preferred Stock; (ii) approve any increase or decrease in the authorized number of shares of Series B Preferred Stock; (iii) approve any amendment, waiver, alteration or repeal of our certificate of incorporation or bylaws in a way that adversely affects the rights, preferences or privileges of the Series B Preferred Stock; (iv) authorize the payment of any dividends (other than dividends paid in capital stock of us or any of our subsidiaries) in excess of $0.10 per share per annum of our Common Stock unless after the payment of such dividends we have unrestricted cash (net of all indebtedness for borrowed money, purchase money obligations, promissory notes or bonds) in an amount equal to at least two times the product obtained by multiplying the number of shares of Series B Preferred Stock outstanding at the time such dividend is paid by the liquidation preference; and (v) authorize the purchase or redemption of: (A) any Common Stock (except for the purchase or redemption from employees, directors and consultants pursuant to agreements providing us with repurchase rights upon termination of their service with us) unless after such purchase or redemption we have unrestricted cash (net of all indebtedness for borrowed money, purchase money obligations, promissory notes or bonds) equal to at least two times the product obtained by multiplying the number of shares of Series B Preferred Stock outstanding at the time such dividend is paid by the liquidation preference; or (B) any class or series of now or hereafter authorized capital stock of ours that ranks junior to (upon a liquidation event) the Series B Preferred Stock.

As a result of the foregoing, TCV may be able to block the proposed approval of any of the above actions, which blockage may prevent us from achieving strategic or other goals dependent on such actions, including without limitation additional capital raising, certain dividend increases and the repurchase of outstanding Common Stock. All of the foregoing rights may limit our ability to take certain actions deemed in the interests of all of our stockholders but as to which the holders of the Series B Preferred Stock have control rights.

If we are unableWe expect to execute cost-control measures successfully,make significant investments in our total operating costs may be greater than expected,business in 2016 to increase organic growth, which may adversely affectwill reduce our financial results.cash and require time to translate to revenue.

 

As partFollowing several years of cost-cutting measures, we intend to make significant investments in our restructuring, we significantly reduced operating costs by reducing staff and implementing general cost-control measures across the Company,business this year, including commitments to terminate use of certain vendor services and assets, and expect to continue these cost management efforts. If we do not continue to achieve expected savings or our operating costs increase as a result of our strategic initiatives, our total operating costs may be greater than anticipated. In addition, if our cost-control strategy is not managed properly, such efforts may affect the qualitylaunching new versions of our products and unveiling a newly expanded news operation intended to serve all of our abilitybusinesses. We also intend to generate future revenue. Reductionsmake additional strategic investments in stafftechnology, marketing and employee compensation could also adversely affectcontent. These investments may not be successful and will reduce our abilityavailable cash to attractspend on other initiatives such as acquisitions of complementary products and retain key employees.services or distributions to our stockholders. In addition, these investments will take some time to translate into increased revenues or may never translate into revenue growth.

10

  

We may have difficulty maintaining or increasing our advertising revenue, a significant portion of which is concentrated among our top advertisers and subject to industry and other factors.

 

Although our reliance on advertising has decreased as an overall component of our revenues, it remains important to our growth. Our ability to maintain or increase our advertising revenue depends onmay be adversely affected by a variety of factors. Such factors include general market conditions, seasonal fluctuations in financial news consumption and overall online usage, our ability to maintain or increase our unique visitors, page view inventory and user engagement, our ability to attract audiences possessing demographic characteristics most desired by our advertisers, and our ability to retain existing advertisers and win new advertisers in a number of advertising categories from other Websites, television, newspapers, magazines, newsletters or other new media.

 

Economic weakness and uncertainty in As a general matter, the United States, in the regions in which we operate and in key advertising categories, have adversely affected and may continue to adversely affect our advertising revenues. Media revenue for the year ended December 31, 2013 decreased by 20% when compared to the year ended December 31, 2012. Economic factors that have adversely affected advertising revenues include lower consumer and business spending, high unemployment, depressed home sales and other challenges affecting the economy. Our advertising revenues are particularly adversely affected if advertisers respond to weak and uneven economic conditions by reducing their budgets or shifting spending patterns or priorities, or if they are forced to consolidate or cease operations.

In addition to adverse economic conditions, the continued development and fragmentation of digital media has intensified competition for advertising revenues. Advertising revenue could decline if the relationships we have with high-traffic Websites isare adversely affected. In addition, our advertising revenue may decline as a result of pricing pressures on Internet advertising rates due to industry developments, changes in consumer interest in the financial media and other factors in and outside of our control, including in particular as a result of any significant or prolonged downturn in, or periods of extreme volatility of, the financial markets. While most of our users access our Website and products through personal computers,As the rateuse of mobile usage is increasing, whereaccelerates as the “go-to” method of consuming digital content, our ability to monetize is less proven andmobile content, for which CPMs are lower.lower, is increasingly important. Also, our advertising revenue would be adversely affected if advertisers sought to use third-party networks to attempt to reach our audience while they visit third-party sites instead of purchasing advertising from us to reach our audience on our own sites. In addition,Further, any advertising revenue that is performance-based may be adversely impacted by the foregoing and other factors. If our advertising revenue significantly decreases, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

 

In 2013,addition to the headwinds facing digital media advertising, general economic weakness and uncertainty in the United States and globally, while improved, continue to adversely affect and may continue to adversely affect our advertising revenues.

Finally, our top five advertisers accounted for approximately 40%38% of our total media revenue an increase from 28% in 2012.2015. Furthermore, although we have advertisers from outside the financial services industry, such as travel, automotive and technology, a large proportion of our top advertisers are concentrated in financial services, particularly in the online brokerage business. Recent consolidation of

9

financial institutions and other factors could cause us to lose a number of our top advertisers, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. As is typical in the advertising industry, generally, our advertising contracts have short notice cancellation provisions.

 

Many individuals are increasingly using mobile devices otherrather than personal computers to access news and other online services. If we are unable to effectively provide our content and subscription products to users of these devices, our business could be adversely affected.

 

The number of people who access news and other online services through mobile devices continues to increase. Ifincrease at a rapid rate. To date, we have not been able to generate revenue from advertising or content delivered to mobile devices as effectively as we have for advertising or content delivered to personal computers. As our members increasingly use mobile devices to access our online services, and if we are unable to successfully implement monetization strategies for our content on mobile devices, if these strategies are not as successful as our offerings for personal computers, or if we incur excessive expenses in this effort, our financial performance and ability to grow revenue would be negatively affected. Additionally, as new devices, such as wearables, and new platforms are continually being released, it is difficult to predict the problems we may encounter in developing versions of our solutions for use on these alternative devices, and we may need to devote significant resources to the creation, support, and maintenance of such devices.new services and products.

 

We face intense competition.

Our services face intense competition from other providers of business, personal finance, investing and ratings content, including:

·online services or Websites focused on business, personal finance or investing, such asThe Wall Street Journal Digital Network,CNN Money, Forbes.com, Reuters.com,Bloomberg.com, Seeking Alpha, Business Insider andCNBC.com, as well as financial portals such as Yahoo! Finance, AOL Daily Finance and MSN Money;

·publishers and distributors of traditional media focused on business, personal finance or investing, including print and radio, such asThe Wall Street Journal and financial talk radio programs, and business television networks such as Bloomberg, CNBC and the Fox Business Channel;

·investment newsletter publishers;

·providers of business intelligence on mergers and acquisitions, restructurings and financings, such asBloomberg andMergermarketGroup; and

·established ratings services, such as Standard & Poor’s, Morningstar and Lipper, with respect to our Ratings products, and rate database providers such as Informa and SNL Kagan, with respect to our RateWatch products.

Additionally, advances in technology have reduced the cost of production and online distribution of print, audio and video content, which has resulted in the proliferation of providers of free content. We compete with these other publications and services for customers, including subscribers, readers and viewers of our video content, for advertising revenue, and for employees and contributors to our services. Our ability to compete successfully depends on many factors, including the quality, originality, timeliness, insightfulness and trustworthiness of our content and that of our competitors, the popularity and performance of our contributors, the success of our recommendations and research, our ability to introduce products and services that keep pace with new investing trends, our ability to adopt and deploy new technologies for running our business, the ease of use of services developed either by us or our competitors and the effectiveness of our sales and marketing efforts. In addition, media technologies and platforms are rapidly evolving and the rate of consumption of media on various platforms may shift

1011

rapidly. If we fail to offer our content through the platforms in which our audience desires to consume it, or if we do not have offerings on such platforms that are as compelling as those of our competitors, our business, results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected. In addition, the economics of distributing content through new platforms may be materially different from the economics of distributing content through our current platforms and any such difference may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

Many of our competitors have longer operating histories, greater name recognition, larger customer bases and significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we have. Increased competition could result in price reductions, reduced margins or loss of market share, any of which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Accordingly, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to compete effectively with our current or future competitors or that this competition will not significantly harm our business.

Risks associated with our strategic acquisitions could adversely affect our business.

 

We havecompleted several acquisitions withinin recent years, and we expect tomay make additional acquisitions and strategic investments in the future. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including difficulties in the assimilation of the operations and services of the acquired companies as well as the diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns. In addition, there may beare expenses incurred in connection with these acquisitions and the acquisition and subsequent assimilation of operations and services, andas well as the potential loss of key employees of the acquired company. There can be no assurance that our acquisitions will be successfully integrated into our operations or that we will be able to realize the benefits intended in such acquisitions. In addition, there can be no assurance that we will complete any future acquisitions or that acquisitions will contribute favorably to our operations and financial condition. For example, in September 2012,October 2014 we acquired The Deal, LLCManagement Diagnostics Limited (“MDL”), a digital platformrelationship capital management company that delivers sophisticated coverage ofoffers BoardEx and is headquartered in the deal economy, primarily through The Deal Pipeline, a leading provider of transactional information services,U.K. with locations in New York, New York and in April 2013, we acquired the assets ofThe DealFlow Report, The Life Settlements Reportand the PrivateRaise database from DealFlow Media, Inc., which have been integrated into The Deal, LLC’s platform. These acquisitions haveChennai, India. This acquisition has helped us expand internationally and is helping to accelerate our subscription services into thetransition from primarily serving retail investors to also becoming an indispensable data, news and information source for institutional channelclients, but we can provide no assurances that our long term strategic objectives will be attained.

 

Although due diligence and detailed analysis is conducted before these acquisitions are completed, there can be no assurance that such steps can or will fully expose all hidden problems that the acquired company may have. In addition, our valuations and analyses are based on numerous assumptions, and there can be no assurance that those assumptions will be proven correct or appropriate. Relevant facts and circumstances of our analyses could have changed over time, and new facts and circumstances may come to light as to render the previous assumptions and the valuations and analyses based thereon incorrect.

 

Our foreign operations subject us to a number of operating, economic, political and regulatory risks that may have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our acquisition of MDL in October 2014 significantly increased the importance of foreign markets to our future operations and growth and also exposes us to a number of additional risks. Operations outside of the United States may be affected by changes in trade protection laws, policies and measures and other regulatory requirements affecting trade and investment; unexpected regulatory, social, political, or economic changes in a specific country or region; changes in intellectual property, privacy and data protection; import/export regulations in both the United States and foreign countries and difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations. Political changes, labor strikes, acts of war or terrorism and natural disasters, some of which may be disruptive, can interfere with our data collection, our customers and all of our activities in a particular location. We may also be affected by potentially adverse tax consequences and difficulties associated with repatriating cash generated or held abroad. Since approximately half of MDL’s revenues are generated outside of the United States, the Company’s acquisition of MDL significantly increases our exposure to these risks.

We are now subject to the European Union (“EU”) regulations relating to privacy, including the EU Directive on Data Protection, which imposes significant restrictions on the collection and use of personal data that are more stringent and impose greater burdens on businesses than current privacy standards in the United States. One such burden is a prohibition on the transfer of personal information from the EU to other countries whose laws do not protect personal data to an adequate level of privacy or security.  The United States is one such country and this prohibition and the fact we are subject to the EU regulations may impact on our ability to carry out certain aspects of our business in the United States. The EU has recently passed the General Data Protection Regulation, which will result in greater compliance burdens for companies with users and operations in Europe over the next two years.  The costs of compliance with, and other burdens imposed by, these laws, regulations and policies that are applicable to us may limit the use and adoption of our products and solutions and could have recorded impairmentsa material adverse impact on our results of operations.

Foreign operations are also subject to risks of violations of laws prohibiting improper payments and bribery, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K. Bribery Act and similar regulations in foreign jurisdictions. The U.K. Bribery Act, for example, prohibits both domestic and international bribery, as well as bribery across both private and public sectors. An organization that fails to prevent bribery committed by anyone associated with the organization can be charged under the U.K. Bribery Act unless the organization can establish the defense of having implemented adequate procedures to prevent bribery. Failure to comply with these laws could subject us to civil and criminal penalties that could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

12

If our goodwill and other intangibles becomes impaired, we may be required to record a reduction in such amount which would negatively impact our financial results.

As of December 31, 2015, we had goodwill of $43.3 million and net intangible assets of $18.7 million. Goodwill and intangible asset impairment analysis and measurement is a process that requires significant judgment. Under the provisions of ASC 350, goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets are required to be tested for impairment on an annual basis and between annual tests whenever circumstances arise that indicate a possible impairment might exist. We perform our annual impairment tests of goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets as of October 1 each year. Impairment exists when the carrying amount of goodwill and there can be no assurances that we will not have to record additional impairmentsindefinite lived intangible assets exceed their implied fair value, resulting in an impairment charge for this excess. In the future.

In 2009past we recorded impairments of goodwill and intangible assets that totaled approximately $22.6 million.assets. Although currently we do not anticipate any impairments,impairment, we may have to record additional impairments in the future which may materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

11

System failure or interruption may result in reduced traffic, reduced revenue and harm to our reputation.

 

Our ability to provide timely, updated information depends on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of our computer and communications hardware and software systems. Similarly, our ability to track, measure and report the delivery of advertisements on our Websites depends on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of third-party systems. Our operations depend in part on the protection of our data systems and those of our third-party providers against damage from human error, natural disasters, fire, power loss, water damage, telecommunications failure, computer viruses, terrorist acts, vandalism, sabotage, and other adverse events. Although we utilize the services of third-party cloud computing providers, specifically Amazon Web Services with procedural security systems and have put in place certain other disaster recovery measures, including offsite storage of backup data, these disaster recovery measures currently may not be comprehensive enough and there is no guarantee that our Internet access and other data operations will be uninterrupted, error-free or secure. Any system failure, including network, software or hardware failure, that causes an interruption in our service or a decrease in responsiveness of our Websites could result in reduced traffic, reduced revenue and harm to our reputation, brand and relations with our advertisers and strategic partners. Our insurance policies may not adequately compensate us for such losses. In such event, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

 

Our Ratings models, purchased from a third party, were written in legacy technologies that do not have robust backup or recovery provisions. The ongoing production of valid ratings data is based upon the successful continued migration of these legacy systems to more robust and current systems. The hardware platforms upon which these applications run have been migrated to more modern equipment within our multi-redundant hosting facilities; however, many of the core application code remains in production. Migration of such complex applications is time consuming, resource intensive and can pose considerable risk.

 

Disruptions to our third-party technology providers and management systems could harm our business and lead to loss of customers and advertisers.

 

We depend on third-party technology providers and management systems to distribute our content and process transactions. For example, we use Akamai TechnologiesFastly and Amazon Web Services to help us efficiently distribute our content to customers. We also use a third party vendor to process credit cards for our subscriptions. We exercise no control over our third-party vendors, which makes us vulnerable to any errors, interruptions, or delays in their operations. Any disruption in the services provided by these vendors could have significant adverse impacts on our business reputation, advertiser and customer relations and operating results. Upon expiration or termination of any of our agreements with third-party vendors, we may not be able to replace the services provided to us in a timely manner or on terms and conditions, including service levels and cost, that are favorable to us, and a transition from one vendor to another vendor could subject us to operational delays and inefficiencies until the transition is complete.

 

13

We may face liability for, or incur costs to defend, information published in our services.

 

We may beFrom time to time we are subject to claims for defamation, libel, copyright or trademark infringement, fraud or negligence, or based on other theories of liability, in each case relating to the articles, commentary, investment recommendations, ratings, or other information we publish inprovide through our services. These types of claims have been brought, sometimes successfully, against media companies in the past, and we presently are defending against a suit alleging defamation, which suit we believe is without merit and in which we are vigorously defending ourselves. We also could be subject to claims based upon the content that is accessible from our Websites through links to other Websites. While we maintain insurance to provide

12

coverage with respect to many such claims, but our insurance may not adequately protect us against these claims.

Difficulties in new product development could harm For example, from time to time, actions filed against us include claims for punitive damages, which are excluded from coverage under our business.

In the current year, we have introduced several new products and services, and expect to continue to do so. However, we may experience difficulties that could delay or prevent us from introducing new products and services in the future, or cause our costs to be higher than anticipated, which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.insurance policies.

 

Failure to establish and maintain successful strategic relationships with other companies could decrease our subscriber and user base.

 

We rely in part on establishing and maintaining successful strategic relationships with other companies to attract and retain a portion of our current subscriber and reader base and to enhance public awareness of our brands. In particular, our relationships with Yahoo! Finance, MSN Money and CNN Money, which index our headlines and/or host our content including our video offerings, have been important components of our effort to enhance public awareness of our brands, which awareness we believe also is enhanced by the public appearances of James J. Cramer, in particular on his “Mad Money” television program and on “Squawk on the Street”, both of which are telecast by CNBC. Additionally, we generate advertising inventory through our Business Desk™ initiative, in which we host business and finance content on Web pages that contain branding elements and/or other content of our partners, including large newspaper chains. There is intense competition for relationships with these firms for content placement on their Websites, for distribution of our audio and video content, and for provision of services similar to our Business Desk, and we may have to pay significant fees, or be unable, to establish additional relationships with large, high-traffic partners or maintain existing relationships in the future. From time to time, we enter into agreements with advertisers that require us to exclusively feature these parties in sections of our Websites. Existing and future exclusivity arrangements may prevent us from entering into other advertising or sponsorship arrangements or other strategic relationships. If we do not successfully establish and maintain our strategic relationships on commercially reasonable terms or if these relationships do not attract significant revenue, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

 

Difficulties associated with our brand development may harm our ability to attract subscribers to our paid services and users to our advertising-supported services.

 

We believe that maintaining and growing awareness about our services is an important aspect of our efforts to continue to attract users. Our new services do not have widely recognized brands, and we will need to increase awareness of these brands among potential users. Our efforts to build brand awareness may not be cost effective or successful in reaching potential users, and some potential users may not be receptive to our marketing efforts or advertising campaigns. Accordingly, we can make no assurances that such efforts will be successful in raising awareness of our brands or in persuading potential users to subscribe to or use our services.

 

Our ability to successfully attract and retain subscribers to our subscription services may be affected by the perceived quality of the content, including the performance of investment ideas we publish, as well as by any legal or practical limitations we may face on our ability to utilize a contributor’s name and likeness in promotional materials.other factors.

 

Our ability to successfully attract and retain subscribers to our subscription services depends in part on our ability to create compelling promotional materials related to those services, which in turn primarily depends upon the quality of the content of the services, including the performance of any

13

investment ideas published in the services. Certain of our subscription services, most notably ourAction Alerts PLUS service, publish specific investment ideas and maintain an actual or model portfolio of equity securities and cash that reflect activity based upon those investment ideas. To the extent the returns on such portfolios fail to meet or exceed the expectations of our subscribers or the performance of relevant benchmarks, our ability to create compelling promotional materials for such services, and to attract new subscribers or retain existing subscribers to such services will be adversely affected. In addition, typically it is usefulAdditionally, factors such as the expiration of temporary product promotions, changes in our renewal policies or practices for ussubscribers to be able to utilize the name and likeness of contributors to market our investment idea subscription services, particularly with respect to those services thator changes in the degree of credit card failures could have well-known contributors, such as our founder, James J. Cramer. We seek to obtain broad rights to utilize our contributors’ names and likenesses in promotional materials. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain the scope of such rights that we would prefer, or that in practice we will be able to utilize to the fullest extent any such rights that we have obtained. Any limitationsa material impact on our ability to utilize the name and likeness of our contributors may have an adverse effect on our ability to promote our services, by limiting the content or distribution of our promotional materials or otherwise.customer retention.

 

Failure to maintain our reputation for trustworthiness may harm our business.

 

Our brand is based upon the integrity of our editorial content. We are proud of the trust and reputation for quality we have developed over the course of more than 1620 years and we seek to renew and deepen that trust continually. We require all of our content contributors, whether employees or outside contributors, to adhere to strict standards of integrity, including standards that are designed to prevent any actual or potential conflict of interest, and to comply with all applicable laws, including securities laws. The occurrence of events such as our misreporting a news story, the non-disclosure of a stock ownership position by one or more of our content contributors, the manipulation of a security by one or more of our content contributors, or any other breach of our compliance policies, could harm our reputation for trustworthiness and reduce readership. In addition, in the event the reputation of any of our directors, officers, key contributors, writers or editorial staff were harmed for any other reason, we could suffer as result of our association with the individual, and also could suffer if the quantity or value of future services we received from the individual was diminished. These events could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

14

Our revenue could be adversely affected if the securities markets and/or mergers and acquisitions activity decline, are stagnant or experience extreme volatility.

 

Our results of operations, particularly related to subscription revenue, are affected by certain economic factors, including the performance of the securities markets and mergers and acquisitions activity. While we believe investors and dealmakers are seeking more information related to the financial markets and M&A dealsmergers and acquisitions from trusted sources, the existence of adverse or stagnant securities markets conditions and lack of investor confidence could result in investors decreasing their interest in investor-related and deal-related publications, which could adversely affect the subscription revenue we derive from our subscription based Websites and newsletters.

 

We may not adequately protect our own intellectual property and may incur costs to defend against, or face liability for, intellectual property infringement claims of others.

 

To protect our rights to our intellectual property (“IP”), we rely on a combination of trademark and copyright law, trade secrettrademarks, copyrights, patent protection, confidentiality agreements and various other contractual arrangements with our employees, affiliates, customers, strategic partners and others. We own several trademark registrations and copyrights, and have pending trademark and patent applications, in the United StatesStates. In addition, our Code of Conduct and we have pending U.S. trademark applicationsBusiness Ethics, employee handbook, and one patent application. Additionally, weother internal policies seek to protect our IP against misappropriation, infringement, and unfair competition. We also utilize various tools to police the Internet forto monitor piracy and unauthorized use of our copyrightedcontent. Finally, whether we are contracting out our IP or licensing third-party content that has been republished without our permission andand/or technology, we may aggressively pursue such infringements in orderincorporate contractual provisions to protect our rights. To protect our intellectual property rights as well as protect against infringement claims in our

14

relationships with business partners, we generally look to incorporate contractual provisions protecting our intellectual propertyIP and seekingseek indemnification for any third-party infringement claims. Some

However, we cannot provide any guarantee that the foregoing provisions will be adequate to protect us from third-party claims or that these provisions will prevent the theft of our services incorporate licensed third-party technology. In these license agreements, the licensors generally have agreed to defend, indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to any claim by a third party that the licensed technology infringes any patent or other proprietary right.

The protective stepsIP, as we have taken may be inadequate to deter misappropriation of our proprietary information. We may be unable to detect the unauthorized use of, or take appropriate steps to enforce, our intellectual propertyIP rights. Failure to adequately protect our intellectual property could harm our brand, devalue our proprietary content, and affect our ability to compete effectively. In addition, other parties may assert infringement claims against us or claim that we have violated a patent or infringed a copyright, trademark or other proprietary right belonging to them, whether on our own or by virtue of our use of certain third-party technology. We cannot assure you that the steps we have taken will be adequate to protect us from other infringement claims. Protecting our intellectual property rights, or defending againstFurther, any infringement claims, even if not meritorious, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources on our part, which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We face government regulation and legal uncertainties.intense competition.

 

Internet Communications, Commerce and Privacy Regulation.The growth and development of the market for Internet commerce and communications has prompted both federal and state laws and regulations concerning the collection and use of personally identifiable information (including consumer credit and financial information), consumer protection, the content of online publications, the taxation of online transactions, the transmission of unsolicited commercial email, popularly known as “spam”, and telemarketing restrictions, such as Do-Not-Call registries. More laws and regulations are under consideration by various governments, agencies and industry self-regulatory groups. Although our compliance with applicable federal and state laws, regulations and industry guidelines has not had a material adverse effect on us, new laws and regulations may be introduced and modifications to existing laws may be enacted that require us to make changes to our business practices. Although we believe that our practices are in compliance with applicable laws, regulations and policies, if we were required to defend our practices against investigations of state or federal agencies or if our practices violated applicable laws, regulations or policies, we could be penalized and someMany of our activitiescompetitors have longer operating histories, greater name recognition, larger customer bases and significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we have. Increased competition could be enjoined. Anyresult in price reductions, reduced margins or loss of the foregoingmarket share, any of which could increase the cost of conducting online activities, decrease demand for our services, lessen our ability to effectively market our services, or otherwise materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Securities Industry Regulation.Our activities include, among other things, the offering of stand-alone services providing stock recommendations and analysis to subscribers. The securities industry in the United States is subject to extensive regulation under both federal and state laws. A failure to comply with regulations applicable to securities industry participants could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Accordingly, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to compete effectively with our current or future competitors or that this competition will not significantly harm our business.

 

15

New regulation, changes

Our services face intense competition from other providers of business, personal finance, investing and ratings content, including:

·online services or Websites focused on business, personal finance or investing, such as The Wall Street Journal Digital NetworkCNN Money, Forbes.com, Reuters.comBloomberg.com, Seeking Alpha, Business Insider and CNBC.com, as well as financial portals such as Yahoo! Finance, AOL Daily Finance and MSN Money;

·publishers and distributors of traditional media focused on business, personal finance or investing, including print and radio, such as The Wall Street Journal and financial talk radio programs, and business television networks such as Bloomberg, CNBC and the Fox Business Channel;

·investment newsletter publishers, such asThe Motley Fool, Stansberry & Associates Investment Research andInvestor Place Media;

·other providers of business intelligence on mergers and acquisitions, restructurings and financings, such as Bloomberg and MergermarketGroup;

·established ratings services, such as Standard & Poor’s, Morningstar and Lipper, with respect to our Ratings products, and rate database providers such as Informa and SNL Kagan, with respect to our RateWatch products; and
·other providers of director, officer and dealmaker data, including Bloomberg, S&P Capital IQ, Dow Jones, The New York Stock Exchange, LexisNexis, Relationship Science, and Thomson Reuters.

Additionally, advances in existing regulation, or changestechnology have reduced the cost of production and online distribution of print, audio and video content, which has resulted in the interpretationproliferation of providers of free content. We compete with these other publications and services for customers, including subscribers, readers and viewers of our video content, for advertising revenue, and for employees and contributors to our services. Our ability to compete successfully depends on many factors, including the quality, originality, timeliness, insightfulness and trustworthiness of our content and that of our competitors, the popularity and performance of our contributors, the success of our recommendations and research, our ability to introduce products and services that keep pace with new investing trends, our ability to adopt and deploy new technologies for running our business, the ease of use of services developed either by us or enforcementour competitors and the effectiveness of existing lawsour sales and rules couldmarketing efforts. In addition, media technologies and platforms are rapidly evolving and the rate of consumption of media on various platforms may shift rapidly. If we fail to offer our content through the platforms in which our audience desires to consume it, or if we do not have offerings on such platforms that are as compelling as those of our competitors, our business, results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected. In addition, the economics of distributing content through new platforms may be materially different from the economics of distributing content through our current platforms and any such difference may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

We face government regulation and legal uncertainties.

We are subject to government regulation in connection with securities laws and regulations applicable to all publicly-owned companies, as well as laws and regulations applicable to businesses generally, including privacy regulations and taxes levied adopted at the local, state, national and international levels. In recent years, consumer protection regulations, particularly in connection with the Internet, have become more aggressive, and we expect that new laws and regulations will continue to be enacted at the local, state, national and international levels. Such new legislation, alone or combined with increasingly aggressive enforcement of existing laws, could have a material adverse effect on our future operating performance and business due to increased compliance costs.

16

Foreign Regulation.exchange variability could adversely affect our consolidated operating results

Our growth strategy contemplates increased services to foreign and domestic customers. As we actively seek customersa consequence of expanding the footprint of the Company to markets outside of the United States, regulatory entities of foreign governmentsin particular the United Kingdom, we will be ableexposed to exercise jurisdiction overmarket risks from changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates that may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. We do not engage in currency hedging or have any positions in derivative instruments to hedge our currency risk. Our reported revenue could suffer if certain foreign currencies, principally the British pound, decline relative to the U.S. dollar, although the impact on operating income would likely be offset in part by an opposing currency impact on locally based operating expense. Conversely, if the U.S. dollar were to weaken against the British pound, assuming all other variables remained constant, our revenues would increase, having a positive impact on earnings, and our overall expenses would increase, having a negative impact on earnings. Also, by virtue of our cross-border operations, we will be subject to the risks normally associated with such activities, including those relating to delayed payments from customers in some countries or difficulties in the relevant country. Ifcollection of receivables generally.

In addition, we were requiredwill be exposed to defend our practices against investigationsthe risk of foreign regulatory agencies or if our practices were deemed to be violative ofchanges in social, political and economic conditions in the laws, regulations or policies of such jurisdictions,countries where we could

15

be penalizedengage in business. Political and some of our activitieseconomic instability in these countries could be enjoined. Any of the foregoing could materially adversely affect our business financial conditionactivities and resultsoperations. Unexpected changes in local regulatory requirements, tariffs and other trade barriers and price or exchange controls could limit operations and make the repatriation of operations.profits difficult. In addition, the uncertainty of differing legal environments could limit our ability to effectively enforce our rights in some markets.

 

Any failure of our internal security measures or breach of our privacy protections could cause us to lose users and subject us to liability.

 

Users who subscribe to our paid subscription services are required to furnish certain personal information (including name, mailing address, phone number, email address and credit card information), which we use to administer our services. We also require users of some of our free services and features to provide us with some personal information during the membership registration process. Additionally, we rely on security and authentication technology licensed from third parties to perform real-time credit card authorization and verification, and at times rely on third parties, including technology consulting firms, to help protect our infrastructure from security threats. We may have to continue to expend capital and other resources on the hardware and software infrastructure that provides security for our processing, storage and transmission of personal information.

17

  

In this regard, our users depend on us to keep their personal information safe and private and not to disclose it to third parties or permit our security to be breached. However, advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography or other events or developments, including improper acts by third parties, may result in a compromise or breach of the security measures we use to protect the personal information of our users. If a party were to compromise or breach our information security measures or those of our agents, such party could misappropriate the personal information of our users, cause interruptions in our operations, expose us to significant liabilities and reporting obligations, damage our reputation and discourage potential users from registering to use our Websites or other services, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

We utilize various third parties to assist with various aspects of our business. Some of these partnerships require the exchange of user information. This is required because some features of our Websites may be hosted by these third parties. While we take significant measures to guarantee the security of our customer data and require such third parties to comply with our privacy and security policies as well as generally be contractually bound to defend, indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to any claims related to any breach of relevant privacy laws related to the service provider, we are still at risk if any of these third-party systems are breached or compromised and may in such event suffer a material adverse effect to business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

Control by principalOur charter documents and Delaware law could prevent a takeover that stockholders officersconsider favorable and directors could adversely affect our stockholders, andalso reduce the termsmarket price of our Series B Preferred Stock include significant control rights.common stock.

 

Our officers, directorscertificate of incorporation and greater-than-five-percent stockholders (and their affiliates), acting together, may have the ability to control our management and affairs, and substantially all matters submitted to stockholders for approval (including the election of directors and any merger, consolidationbylaws contain provisions that could delay or sale of all or substantially all of our assets). Some of these persons acting individually or together, even in the absence of control, may be able to exert a significant degree of influence over such matters. The interests of persons having this concentration of ownership may not always coincide with our interests or the interests of other stockholders. This concentration of ownership, for example, may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventingprevent a change in control of the Company, impedingour company. These provisions could also make it more difficult for stockholders to elect directors and take other corporate actions. These provisions include:

providing for a merger, consolidation, takeover or other business combination involving the Company or discouraging a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of the Company, which in turn could materially adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock.

16

TCV VI, L.P. and TCV Member Fund, L.P., hold 5,500 shares of our Series B Preferred Stock (“Series B Preferred Stock”), which are convertible into an aggregate of 3,856,942 shares of our Common Stock, at a conversion price of $14.26 per share, or approximately 11% of our outstanding Common Stock. The holders of the Series B Preferred Stock have the right to vote on any matter submitted to a vote of the stockholders of the Company and are entitled to vote that number of votes equal to the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of such holders’ shares of Series B Preferred Stock. In addition, so long as 2,200 shares of Series B Preferred Stock remain outstanding, the holders of a majority of such shares will have the right to appoint one person to ourclassified board of directors although the holder of our Series B Preferred Stock has with staggered, three-year terms;

not currently exercised this right. 

So long as 1,650 shares of Series B Preferred Stock remain outstanding, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of such shares will be necessary to take any of the following actions: (i) authorize, create or issue any class or classes of our capital stock ranking senior to, or on a parity with (as to dividends or upon a liquidation event) the Series B Preferred Stock or any securities exercisable or exchangeableproviding for or convertible into, any now or hereafter authorized capital stock ranking senior to, or on a parity with (as to dividends or upon a liquidation event) the Series B Preferred Stock; (ii) any increase or decreasecumulative voting in the authorized numberelection of shares of Series B Preferred Stock; (iii) anydirectors;

permitting an amendment waiver, alteration or repeal of our certificate of incorporation or bylaws inonly through a way that adversely affects the rights, preferences or privilegessuper-majority vote of the Series B Preferred Stock; (iv)stockholders;
prohibiting stockholder action by written consent;
require that, to the payment of any dividends (other than dividends paid in capital stock offullest extent permitted by law and unless we consent to an alternate forum, certain proceedings against or involving us or anyour directors, officers, or employees be brought exclusively in the Court of our subsidiaries)Chancery in excessthe State of $0.10 per share per annumDelaware;
limiting the persons who may call special meetings of our Common Stock unless after the payment of such dividends we have unrestricted cash (net of all indebtednessstockholders; and
requiring advance notification for borrowed money, purchase money obligations, promissory notes or bonds) in an amount equal to at least two times the product obtained by multiplying the number of shares of Series B Preferred Stock outstanding at the time such dividend is paid by the liquidation preference;stockholder director nominations and (v) the purchase or redemption of: (A) any Common Stock (except for the purchase or redemption from employees, directors and consultants pursuant to agreements providing us with repurchase rights upon termination of their service with us) unless after such purchase or redemption we have unrestricted cash (net of all indebtedness for borrowed money, purchase money obligations, promissory notes or bonds) equal to at least two times the product obtained by multiplying the number of shares of Series B Preferred Stock outstanding at the time such dividend is paid by the liquidation preference; or (B) any class or series of now or hereafter authorized capital stock of ours that ranks junior to (upon a liquidation event) the Series B Preferred Stock.

other proposals.

 

As a result of the foregoing, the requisite holders of the Series B Preferred Stock may be able to block the proposed approval of any of the above actions, which blockage may prevent us from achieving strategic or other goals dependent on such actions, including without limitation additional capital raising, certain dividend increasesThese and the redemption of outstanding Common Stock. All of the foregoing rights may limit our ability to take certain actions deemed in the interests of all of our stockholders but as to which the holders of the Series B Preferred Stock have control rights.

Our staggered board and certain other provisions in our certificate of incorporation, by-laws orour bylaws, and under Delaware law could prevent or delay a changediscourage potential takeover attempts, reduce the price that investors might be willing to pay for shares of control.our common stock in the future and result in the market price being lower than it would be without these provisions.

 

Provisions ofIf our restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws and Delaware law – including without limitation the fact that we have a staggered board, with only approximately one-third ofability to use our directors standing for re-election each year – could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire the Company, even if doing so would be beneficial to our stockholders.

17

The utilization of tax operating loss carryforwards depends upon future income.and other tax attributes is limited, we may not receive the benefit of those assets.

 

We have net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $156$154 million as of December 31, 2013,2015, available to offset future taxable income through 2033.2035. These net operating losses date back to December 1999 and will begin expiring in 2019. Our ability to fully utilize these net operating loss carryforwards is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income before the expiration of the carryforward period attributable to these net operating losses. Furthermore, as a result of prior ownership changes under section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, approximately $123 million of these net operating losses will be subject to certain limitations.

 

Investment of our cash carries risks.

 

Financial instruments that subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash. We maintain all of our cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash in fourseven financial institutions and perform periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of these institutions. No assurances can be made that the third-party institutions will retain acceptable credit ratings or investment practices. Investment decisions of third parties and market conditions may adversely affect our cash balances and financial condition. While we believe our investment policy is conservative, there can be no assurance that we will not suffer losses on any of our investments.

 

18

If we fail to maintain proper and effective internal controls, our ability to produce accurate and timely financial statements could be impaired and investors’ views of us could be harmed.

 

As a Public Company, we are required to maintain internal control over financial reporting and to report any material weaknesses in such internal controls. We have evaluated and tested our internal controls in order to allow management to report on our internal controls, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. If we are not able to meet the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner or with adequate compliance, we would be required to disclose material weaknesses if they develop or are uncovered and we may be subject to sanctions or investigation by regulatory authorities, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission. Any such action could negatively impact the perception of us in the financial market and our business. As a smaller reporting company, we are exempt from any auditor attestation requirements regarding management’s reports on the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting. As a result, we may not discover any problems in a timely manner and current and potential stockholders could lose confidence in our financial reporting, which would harm our business and the trading price of our Common Stock.

 

In addition, our internal controls may not prevent or detect all errors and fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, is based upon certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable assurance that the objectives of the control system will be met.

 

Our publicIf securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or if they publish negative reports about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock is listedmay be influenced by the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. We do not have control over these analysts. If one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our stock or change their opinion of our shares or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to publish reports on us regularly, we could lose visibility in the Nasdaq Globalfinancial markets, which could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.

If we are unable to satisfy the continued listing requirements of The NASDAQ Stock Market, our common stock could be delisted and wethe price and liquidity of our common stock may not be able to maintain that listing, which may make it more difficult for you to sell your shares.adversely affected.

 

Our public common stock is currently listed on the NasdaqThe NASDAQ Global Market. The Nasdaq has several quantitative and qualitative requirements companies must comply with toTo maintain thisthe listing including a $1.00 minimum bid price. While we believeof our common stock, we are currently in compliance with all Nasdaq requirements, there can be no assurance we will continuerequired to meet Nasdaqcertain listing requirements, including, theamong others, a requirement to maintain a minimum closing bid price that Nasdaq will interpret these requirements inof $1.00 per share. If our common stock trades below the same manner we do$1.00 minimum closing bid price requirement for 30 consecutive business days or if we believe we meet the requirements, or that Nasdaq will not change such requirements or add new requirements to include requirements we do not meet inother listing requirements, we may be notified by NASDAQ of non-compliance. Our common stock recently closed below $1.00 per share on February 25, 2016 and has been closing at or below $1.00 per share since that date and through the future.filing of this report. If we are delisted from the Nasdaq Global Market,price per share of our publiccommon stock were to fall below NASDAQ listing standards, our common stock may be considered a pennydelisted. If we are notified by NASDAQ of non-compliance with the $1.00 minimum closing bid price requirement, we would regain compliance if our common stock undertrades above $1.00 per share for ten consecutive business days during the regulations180 days following notice of non-compliance. We may also be permitted to transfer our listing to the SECNasdaq Capital Market, which would provide us an additional 180 days to regain compliance with the minimum closing bid price requirement. If our common stock is delisted, market liquidity for our common stock could be severely affected and would thereforeour stockholders’ ability to sell their shares of our common stock could be limited. In addition, our common stock could be subject to “penny stock” rules thatwhich impose additional sales practicedisclosure requirements on broker-dealers who selland could further negatively impact our securities. The additional burdens imposed upon broker-dealers may discourage broker-dealers from effecting transactions inmarket liquidity for our public common stock, which could severely limit market

18

liquidity of the public common stock and any stockholder’sour stockholders’ ability to sell their shares of our securities incommon stock. Accordingly, a delisting of our common stock from NASDAQ would negatively affect the secondary market. This lackvalue of liquidity wouldour common stock. Delisting could also likely make it more difficult for ushave other negative results, including, but not limited to, raise capital in the future.loss of institutional investor interest.

 

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

 

None.

 

Item 2. Properties.

 

We do not own any real property and we lease all of our facilities. Our principal administrative, sales, marketing, and editorial facilities currently reside in a facility encompassing approximately 35,000 square feet of office space on one floor in an office building at 14 Wall Street in New York, New York. Bankers Financial Products Corporation (d/b/a RateWatch) occupies approximately 15,00016,000 square feet of office space in Fort Atkinson, Wisconsin. The Deal, LLC occupies approximately 2,211 square feet of office space in Petaluma, California and approximately 350 square feet of office space in Washington, D.C. The Deal’s U.K. subsidiary, Management Diagnostic Limited (“MDL”), occupies approximately 8,202 square feet of office space in London, England, and MDL’s subsidiary, BoardEx India Private Limited, occupies approximately 22,480 square feet of office space in Chennai, India. We also remain responsible for a sublease of approximately 6,500 square feet of office space in an office building at 29 West 38th Street in New York, New York, which we in turn have sublet to another tenant, as well as approximately 21,500 square feet of office space in an office building at 20 Broad Street in New York, New York, which we in turn have sublet to another tenant.

 

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

 

The Company is party to other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business or otherwise, none of which is deemed material.

 

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

 

Not applicable.

19

PART II

 

Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

 

We have been a Nasdaq-listed company since May 11, 1999 and our Common Stock currently is quoted on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol TST. There is no public trading market for our Series B Preferred Stock. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing sales prices per share of the Common Stock as reported on the Nasdaq Global Market.

 

 Low  High  Low  High 
2012        
2014        
First quarter $1.70  $2.21  $2.20  $2.94 
Second quarter $1.45  $2.17  $2.30  $2.68 
Third quarter $1.34  $1.56  $2.12  $2.55 
Fourth quarter $1.52  $1.68  $2.10  $2.46 
2013        
2015        
First quarter $1.59  $1.93  $1.75  $2.30 
Second quarter $1.85  $1.98  $1.72  $1.97 
Third quarter $1.82  $2.30  $1.59  $1.92 
Fourth quarter $2.08  $2.44  $1.44  $1.73 

 

On February 24, 2014,March 3, 2016, the last reported sale price for our Common Stock was $2.91$0.89 per share.

The graph below compares the cumulative total stockholder return on the Company’s Common Stock from December 31, 2010 through December 31, 2015 with the cumulative total return on the Nasdaq Composite Index and the Research Data Group (RDG) Internet Composite Index. The performance graph is based upon closing prices on December 31st of each year other than 2011, which is based on the closing price on December 30, 2011, the last trading day before December 31, 2011. The comparison assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 2010 in the Company’s Common Stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends. The returns shown are based upon historical results and are not intended to suggest future performance.

20

ASSUMES $100 INVESTED ON DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND REINVESTMENT OF ALL DIVIDENDS
  December 31, 
  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015 
                   
TheStreet, Inc.  100.00   65.55   67.10   90.80   99.59   66.35 
NASDAQ Composite  100.00   100.53   116.92   166.19   188.78   199.95 
RDG Internet Composite  100.00   102.11   122.23   199.42   195.42   267.25 

 

Holders

 

The number of holders of record of our Common Stock on February 24, 2014March 3, 2016 was 207,181 which does not include beneficial owners of our Common Stock whose shares are held in the names of various dealers, clearing agencies, banks, brokers and other fiduciaries.

 

Dividends

 

There were no dividends paid during the year ended December 31, 2013. The Company has announced that it intends to reinstate the payment of a $0.025 quarterly per share dividend in 2014, beginning with the first quarter of 2014. In the third quarter of 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors suspended the payment of a quarterly dividend. During both the first and second quarters of 2012, and forFor each of the four quarters in the yearyears ended December 31, 2011,2015 and 2014, the Company paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.025 per share on its Common Stock and its Series B Preferred Stock on a converted common share basis. For the years ended December 31, 20122015 and 2011, these2014, the dividend payments totaled approximately $1.8$3.9 million and $3.8$3.9 million, respectively. The Certificate of Designations for the Series B Preferred Stock currently prohibits the Company from paying cash dividends in excess of $0.10 per share per annum without the prior approval of holder of the Series B Preferred Stock. The Company does not intend to pay a cash dividend for the first quarter of 2016 and will continue to evaluate the uses of its cash in 2016 in connection with planned investments in the business.

 

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

The Company did not repurchase any shares of its Common Stock during the three monthsyear ended December 31, 20132015 as notedthe affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Series B Preferred Stock, voting separately as a single class, is currently necessary in order for us to repurchase any of our Common Stock. Absent the table below.consent of the holders of our Series B Preferred Stock, the Company will be unable to conduct share repurchases. For additional information, see Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Treasury Stock” and Item 1A “Risk Factors — The terms of our Series B Preferred Stock include a substantial liquidation preference, as well as significant control rights.”

 

2021
Period (a)
Total
Number of
Shares (or
Units)
Purchased
  (b)
Average
Price Paid
per Share
(or Unit)
  (c)
Total Number of
Shares (or Units)
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs
  (d)
Maximum Number
(or Approximate
Dollar Value) of
Shares (or Units) that
May Yet Be
Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs*
 
                 
October 1 - 31, 2013    $     $2,678,878 
November 1 - 30, 2013    $     $2,678,878 
December 1 - 31, 2013    $     $2,678,878 
Total    $     $2,678,878 

 

*In December 2000, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $10 million worth of the Company’s Common Stock, from time to time, in private purchases or in the open market. In February 2004, the Company’s Board approved the resumption of this program under new price and volume parameters, leaving unchanged the maximum amount available for repurchase under the program. The program does not have a specified expiration date and is subject to certain limitations. See “Risk Factors — Control by principal stockholders, officers and directors could adversely affect our stockholders, and the terms of our Series B Preferred Stock include significant control rights.”

  

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

 

The following selected financial data is qualified by reference to, and should be read in conjunction with, our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” appearing elsewhere herein. The selected statement of operations data presented below for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122015, 2014 and 2011,2013, and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 20132015 and 2012,2014, are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein. The selected statement of operations data presented below for the years ended December 31, 20102012 and 20092011 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 and 20092011 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements, which are not included herein.

  For the Year Ended December 31, 
  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011 
  (In thousands, except per share data) 
Statement of Operations Data: (1)               
Net revenue:                    
Subscription services $55,206  $48,036  $43,549  $37,149  $38,901 
Media  12,450   13,017   10,901   13,572   18,859 
Total net revenue  67,656   61,053   54,450   50,721   57,760 
Operating expense:                    
Cost of services  33,616   31,731   27,432   24,886   26,499 
Sales and marketing  16,191   15,600   14,453   13,396   16,682 
General and administrative  15,000   13,947   12,219   13,638   15,811 
Depreciation and amortization  4,309   3,179   3,769   5,512   5,757 
Restructuring and other charges  (1,221)     386   6,590   1,826 
Loss (gain) on disposition of assets        187   (233)   
Total operating expense  67,895   64,457   58,446   63,789   66,575 
Operating loss  (239)  (3,404)  (3,996)  (13,068)  (8,815)
Net interest (expense) income  (123)  89   210   353   668 
Loss on sales of marketable securities              (35)
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes  (362)  (3,315)  (3,786)  (12,715)  (8,182)
Provision for income taxes  1,181   475          
Loss from continuing operations  (1,543)  (3,790)  (3,786)  (12,715)  (8,182)
Discontinued operations:                    
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations              (2)
Loss from discontinued operations              (2)
Net loss  (1,543)  (3,790)  (3,786)  (12,715)  (8,184)
Preferred stock cash dividends  386   386      193   386 
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(1,929) $(4,176) $(3,786) $(12,908) $(8,570)
Cash dividends paid on common shares $3,539  $3,477  $  $1,636  $3,447 
Basic and diluted net loss per share:                    
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(0.06) $(0.12) $(0.11) $(0.39) $(0.27)
Weighted average basic and diluted shares outstanding  34,839   34,371   33,725   32,710   31,954 
                     
Cash dividends declared and paid per common share $0.10  $0.10  $  $0.05  $0.10 

 

2122

  For the Year Ended December 31, 
  2013  2012  2011  2010  2009 
  (In thousands, except per share data) 
Statement of Operations Data:               
Net revenue:                    
Subscription services $43,549  $37,149  $38,901  $38,099  $37,551 
Media  10,901   13,572   18,859   19,087   22,689 
Total net revenue  54,450   50,721   57,760   57,186   60,240 
Operating expense:                    
Cost of services  27,432   24,886   26,499   25,557   29,100 
Sales and marketing  14,453   13,396   16,682   15,841   12,078 
General and administrative  12,219   13,638   15,811   18,053   18,916 
Asset impairments           555   24,137 
Depreciation and amortization  3,769   5,512   5,757   4,693   4,985 
Restructuring and other charges  386   6,590   1,826      3,461 
Loss (gain) on disposition of assets  187   (233)     (1,319)  530 
Total operating expense  58,446   63,789   66,575   63,380   93,207 
Operating loss  (3,996)  (13,068)  (8,815)  (6,194)  (32,967)
Net interest income  210   353   668   846   950 
(Loss) gain on sales of marketable securities        (35)     295 
Other income           21   154 
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes  (3,786)  (12,715)  (8,182)  (5,327)  (31,568)
Provision for income taxes              (16,134)
Loss from continuing operations  (3,786)  (12,715)  (8,182)  (5,327)  (47,702)
Discontinued operations: (*)                    
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations        (2)  (7)  (15)
Loss from discontinued operations        (2)  (7)  (15)
Net loss  (3,786)  (12,715)  (8,184)  (5,334)  (47,717)
Preferred stock cash dividends     193   386   386   386 
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(3,786) $(12,908) $(8,570) $(5,720) $(48,103)
Cash dividends paid on common shares $  $1,636  $3,447  $3,350  $3,201 
Basic and diluted net loss per share:                    
Loss from continuing operations $(0.11) $(0.38) $(0.26) $(0.17) $(1.56)
Loss from discontinued operations        (0.00)  (0.00)  (0.00)
Net loss  (0.11)  (0.38)  (0.26)  (0.17)  (1.56)
Preferred stock dividends     (0.01)  (0.01)  (0.01)  (0.01)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(0.11) $(0.39) $(0.27) $(0.18) $(1.57)
Weighted average basic and diluted shares outstanding  33,725   32,710   31,954   31,593   30,586 

 

  December 31, 
  2013  2012  2011  2010  2009 
  (In thousands) 
Balance Sheet Data:                    
Cash and cash equivalents, current and noncurrent marketable securities, current and noncurrent restricted cash $59,842  $60,541  $75,315  $78,555  $82,573 
Working capital  31,208   18,829   46,013   27,352   46,063 
Total assets  108,894   111,535   121,413   129,542   133,714 
Long-term obligations, less current maturities  4,959   4,629   4,857   3,236   1,519 
Total stockholders’ equity  74,163   75,458   88,144   97,993   104,474 

  December 31, 
  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011 
  (In thousands) 
Balance Sheet Data (1):                    
Cash and cash equivalents, current and noncurrent marketable securities, current and noncurrent restricted cash $30,697  $37,329  $59,842  $60,541  $75,315 
Working capital  2,074   5,326   31,208   18,829   46,013 
Total assets  102,892   111,932   108,894   111,535   121,413 
Long-term obligations, less current maturities  7,267   7,639   4,959   4,629   4,857 
Total stockholders’ equity  61,994   67,870   74,163   75,458   88,144 

 

(*)(1)In June 2005, the Company committed to a plan to discontinue the operationsAcquisitions of its wholly owned subsidiary, Independent Research Group LLC, which operated the Company’s securities research and brokerage segment. Accordingly, the operating results relating to this segmentbusinesses we have been segregated from continuing operations and reported as discontinued operations on a separate line itemmade are included in our consolidated financial statements beginning on the consolidated statementsdates of operations.acquisition. Acquisitions we have made for the periods indicated above consist of: MDL in October 2014; The DealFlow Report, The Life Settlements Report and the PrivateRaise database in April 2013; and The Deal, LLC in September 2012. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Note 2 to Consolidated Financial Statements (Acquisitions) for additional information regarding our acquisitions.

22

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

 

Please refer to the Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements appearing in Part I, Item 1 of this Report.

 

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.

 

Overview

 

TheStreet, Inc., together with its wholly owned subsidiaries (“TheStreet”, “we”, “us” or the “Company”),is a leading digital financial media company focused on the financial and mergers and acquisitions environment. The Company’s collection of digital services provides users, subscribers and advertisers with a variety of content and tools through a range of online, social media, tablet and mobile channels.Our mission is to provide investors and advisors with actionable ideas from the world of investing, finance and business, and dealmakers with sophisticated analysis of the mergers and acquisitions environment in order to break down information barriers, level the playing field and help all individuals and organizations grow their wealth. Withwealth.With a robust suite of digital services, TheStreet offers the tools and insights needed to make informed decisions about earning, investing, saving and spending money. Since its inception in 1996, TheStreet believes it has distinguished itself from other digitalfinancial media companies with its journalistic excellence, unbiased approach and interactive multimedia coverage of the financial markets, economy, industry trends, investment and financial planning.

 

SubscriptionServices

 

Subscription services revenue is comprised of subscriptions, licenses and fees for access to securities investment information, stock market commentary, rate services, director and officer profiles, relationship capital management services, and transactional information pertaining to the mergers and acquisitions and other changes in the corporate control environment. Subscription services contributed 82% of our total revenue in 2015, as compared to 79% in 2014 and 80% in 2013. The increase is primarily the result of the acquisition of MDL in October 2014.

23

  

We believe we were one of the first companies to successfully create a large scale, consumer-focused, digital subscription services content business. We believe we have been able to successfully build our subscription services business because we have established a track record for over 1720 years of providing high quality, independent investing ideas that have produced financial value for our readers. We believe our track record provides us with a competitive advantage and we will seek to enhance the value of our leading brand and our ability to monetize that value.

 

In addition to our consumer-focused subscription products, which includeRealMoney,RealMoney Pro, Options Profits, ActionsAction Alerts PLUS,Breakout Stocks,TheStreet Quant Ratings,andStocks Under $10, our subscription services business also includes information and transactional services revenue from RateWatch and The Deal.

 

RateWatchmaintains a constantly-updated database of financial ratedeposit, loan and fee rate data collected from more than 95,000over 100,000 financial institutions (at the branch level), including certificate of deposit, money market account, savings account, checking account, home mortgage, home equity loan, credit cardinstitutions. This historical and auto loan rates. This informationreal-time rate data is licensed to financial institutions, and government agencies, on a subscription basis,educational researchers and commercial organizations. Data is provided in the form offormats ranging from standard rate templates to large raw data files for use with third party analytical tools. The RateWatch product line also includes banking-related product and custom reports that outline the competitive landscape for our clients. The data collected by RateWatch also serves as the foundation for the information available onBankingMyWay, an advertising-supported Website that enables consumers to search for the most competitive localfee comparisons, financial strength reporting, educational webinars, mystery shopping and national rates.consumer and financial institution surveys.

23

In September 2012, the Company acquired The Deal and transformed its business into a digital subscription platform that delivers sophisticated coverage of theon changes in corporate control, including mergers and acquisitions, environment, primarily through The Deal Pipeline, a leading provider of transactional information services.private equity, corporate activism and restructuring. In April 2013, the Company acquiredThe DealFlow Report, The Life Settlements Reportand the PrivateRaise database from DealFlow Media, IncInc. to further its product offeringsbroaden the information and services available to institutional investors. These newsletters and database, and the employees providing their content, have been incorporated into The Deal.

Additionally, in October 2014, the Company acquired Management Diagnostics Limited (“MDL”), a privately held company headquartered in London, England to expand the Company’s international operations and further the Company’s transition from primarily serving retail investors to also becoming an indispensable data and business intelligence source for institutional clients. Founded in 1999, MDL is the owner of BoardEx, an institutional relationship capital management database and platform. Clients, including investment banks, consultancies, executive search firms, law firms and academia, use BoardEx to leverage their relationships and facilitate business and corporate development initiatives. MDL’s products and services, and the employees providing these products and services have been incorporated into The Deal.

 

Our subscription services revenue also includes revenue generated from syndication and licensing of data from TheStreet Ratings (“Ratings”), which tracks the risk-adjusted performance of more than 20,000 mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and more than 4,000 stocks. Subscription services contributed 80% of our total revenue in 2013, as compared to 73% in 2012 and 67% in 2011.

 

Media

 

Media revenue is comprised of fees charged for the placement of advertising and sponsorships within TheStreet and its affiliated properties, our subscription and institutional services,event and other miscellaneous revenue. Media contributed 18% of our total revenue in 2015, as compared to 21% in 2014 and 20% in 2013. The decrease is primarily the result of the acquisition of MDL in October 2014, which added to the Company’s subscription services revenue.

24

  

Our advertising-supported properties, which includeTheStreet,MainStreet, Stockpickr andReal Money, attract one of the largest and most affluent audiences of any digital publisher in our content vertical.TheStreet, with its enviable track record as a leading and distinctive digital voice in the financial category, is regarded as a must-buy for most of our core online brokerage advertisers and a highly effective means for other financial services companies and non-endemic advertisers to communicate with our engaged, affluent audience. Our direct sales team sells the full capabilities of TheStreet and its affiliated properties via sponsorships, custom programs, video, mobile, newsletters, audience targeting, native advertising, social amplification and distribution as well as programmatic direct and real time bidding.

 

Our media revenue also includes revenue generated from syndication and licensing of data as well as other miscellaneous, non-subscription related sources. Media contributed 20% of our total revenue in 2013, as compared to 27% in 2012 and 33% in 2011.

 

Results of Operations

Comparison of Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 20132015 and 20122014

 

Revenue

 

  For the Year Ended December 31,    
  2013  Percent
of Total
Revenue
  2012  Percent
of Total
Revenue
  Percent
Change
 
Revenue:                    
Subscription services $43,549,359   80% $37,149,143   73%  17%
Media  10,901,052   20%  13,571,660   27%  -20%
Total revenue $54,450,411   100% $50,720,803   100%  7%
24
  For the Year Ended December 31,    
Revenue: 2015  

Percent

of Total
Revenue

  2014  

Percent

of Total

Revenue

  

Percent

Change

 
Subscription services $55,205,507   82% $48,035,953   79%  15%
Media  12,450,393   18%  13,017,265   21%  -4%
  Total revenue $67,655,900   100% $61,053,218   100%  11%

Subscription services. Subscription services revenue is comprised of subscriptions, licenses and fees for access to securities investment information, stock market commentary, rate services, director and officer profiles, relationship capital management services, and transactional information pertaining to the mergers and acquisitions and other changes in the corporate control environment. Revenue is recognized ratably over the contract period.

 

Subscription services revenue for the year ended December 31, 20132015 increased by approximately $6.4$7.2 million, or 17%15%, when compared to the year ended December 31, 2012.2014. The increase was the result of approximately $7.1$8.1 million of additional revenue related to the operations of The DealManagement Diagnostics Limited (“MDL”), which was acquired on October 31, 2014 and DealFlow.therefore contributed only two months of revenue in the prior year period. Excluding The Deal and DealFlow,the impact of MDL in both periods, revenue for the year ended December 31, 20132015 decreased by approximately $715$934 thousand, or 2%, when compared to the year ended December 31, 2012.2014. The decrease was primarily related to a 4%2% decrease in the weighted-average number of subscriptions, while the average revenue recognized per subscription partially offset by a 2% increase inremained flat over the weighted-average number of subscriptions. The decrease in the average revenue recognized per subscription during the period was primarily the result of the mix of products sold and the introduction during the current year of several subscription products at lower prices. While we have been able to reduce our subscriber attrition rate, the number of new subscribers was not sufficient to offset the reduction in the average revenue recognized per subscription.periods.

 

Media. Media revenue is comprised of fees charged for the placement of advertising and sponsorships within TheStreet and its affiliated properties, our subscription and institutional services,event and other miscellaneous revenue.

 

Media revenue for the year ended December 31, 20132015 decreased by approximately $2.7 million,$567 thousand, or 20%4%, when compared to the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase in media revenue associated with The Deal and DealFlow totaled approximately $470 thousand during the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the prior year period. Excluding The Deal and DealFlow, revenue for the year ended December 31, 2013 decreased by approximately $3.1 million, or 25%, when compared to the year ended December 31, 2012.2014. The decrease in mediaadvertising revenue was primarilyexpected since the resultCompany reduced available inventory for advertising as we focus on enhancing user experience on our free sites to grow the number of reduced demand from non-repeat advertisers. Media revenue includes approximately $94 thousand of barter revenue in the year ended December 31, 2013. There was no barter revenue in the prior year period.subscribers to our subscription based products.

25

  

Operating Expense

 

 For the Year Ended December 31,     For the Year Ended December 31,    
 2013 Percent
of Total
Revenue
 2012 Percent
of Total
Revenue
 Percent
Change
  2015 Percent
of Total
Revenue
 2014 Percent
of Total
Revenue
 Percent
Change
 
Operating expense:                                        
Cost of services $27,431,566   50% $24,886,142   49%  -10% $33,615,867   50% $31,730,740   52%  6%
Sales and marketing  14,453,465   27%  13,395,328   26%  -8%  16,190,749   24%  15,600,129   26%  4%
General and administrative  12,218,964   22%  13,637,895   27%  10%  15,000,439   22%  13,946,681   23%  8%
Depreciation and amortization  3,768,536   7%  5,512,299   11%  32%  4,309,094   6%  3,179,377   5%  36%
Restructuring and other charges  385,610   1%  6,589,792   13%  94%  (1,221,224)  -2%        N/A 
Loss (gain) on disposition of assets  187,434   0%  (232,989)  0%  N/A 
Total operating expense $58,445,575      $63,788,467       8% $67,894,925      $64,456,927       5%

 

Cost of services.Cost of services expense includesconsists primarily of compensation, benefits, outside contributor costs related to the creation of our content, licensed data and the technology required to publish our content.

25

Cost of services expense increased by approximately $2.5$1.9 million, or 10%6%, over the periods.period. The increase was the result of approximately $2.8 million of additional cost related to the operations of MDL, which was acquired on October 31, 2014 and therefore contributed only two months of expense in the prior year period. Excluding the impact of MDL in both periods, cost of services expense for the year ended December 31, 2015 decreased by approximately $934 thousand, or 3%, when compared to the year ended December 31, 2014. The decrease was primarily the result of costs associated with the operations of The Deallower compensation and DealFlow combined with higherrelated expense, fees paid to outside contributors and revenue share payments made to certain distribution partners,recruiting fees, the aggregate of which decreased by approximately $1.6 million. These cost decreases were partially offset by higher third-party data, consulting, hosting and internet related costs, the aggregate of which increased by approximately $4.4 million. These cost increases were partially offset by lower compensation expense due to a 7% decrease in average headcount (excluding the impact of increased headcount of The Deal and DealFlow), as well as reduced expenses relating to computer services and supplies, data used on the Company’s Websites, hosting, internet fees, and increased reimbursed expenses relating to a third party services agreement, the aggregate of which decreased by approximately $1.7 million.$801 thousand.

 

Sales and marketing.Sales and marketing expense consists primarily of compensation expense for the direct sales force, marketing services, and customer service departments, advertising and promotion expenses and credit card processing fees.

 

Sales and marketing expense increased by approximately $1.1 million,$591 thousand, or 8%4%, over the periods.period. The increase was the result of costs associated withapproximately $1.1 million of additional cost related to the operations of The DealMDL, which was acquired on October 31, 2014 and DealFlow, which increased by approximately $2.7 million. These costs were partially offset by reduced compensationtherefore contributed only two months of expense due to an 18% decrease in average headcount (excludingthe prior year period. Excluding the impact of increased headcountMDL in both periods, sales and marketing expense for the year ended December 31, 2015 decreased by approximately $553 thousand, or 4%, when compared to the year ended December 31, 2014. The decrease was primarily the result of The Deal and DealFlow) combined with lower advertising, promotion and promotion, public relations consulting, and serving costs, for third-party advertisers, the aggregate of which decreased by approximately $1.5 million. Sales$896 thousand. These cost decreases were partially offset by higher compensation and marketingrelated expense includes $94 thousand of barter expense in the year ended December 31, 2013(primarily commission payments and $183 thousand in the prior year period.related payroll taxes), which increased by approximately $346 thousand.

 

General and administrative. General and administrative expense consists primarily of compensation for general management, finance, technology, legal and administrative personnel, occupancy costs, professional fees, insurance and other office expenses.

26

  

General and administrative expense increased by approximately $1.1 million, or 8%, over the period. The increase was the result of approximately $1.6 million of additional cost related to the operations of MDL, which was acquired on October 31, 2014 and therefore contributed only two months of expense in the prior year period. Excluding the impact of MDL in both periods, general and administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2015 decreased by approximately $1.4 million,$515 thousand, or 10%4%, overwhen compared to the periods.year ended December 31, 2014. The decrease was primarily the result of the absence of costs in the current year related to the MDL acquisition and to a conference that the Company hosted, both of which were incurred in the prior year period, lower compensation and related expense (primarily reduced bonus payments), as well as reduced contributions to TheStreet Foundation, the aggregate of which decreased by approximately $1.3 million. These cost decreases were offset by higher professional, recruiting and tax expense, the aggregate of which increased by approximately $781 thousand.

Depreciation and amortization.Depreciation and amortization expense increased by approximately $1.1 million, or 36%, over the period. The increase was the result of approximately $952 thousand of additional cost related to the operations of MDL, which was acquired on October 31, 2014 and therefore contributed only two months of expense in the prior year period. Excluding the impact of MDL in both periods, depreciation and amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2015 increased by approximately $178 thousand, or 6%, when compared to the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase was primarily the result of a reduction to the estimated useful life of certain fixed assets acquired from The Deal and a capitalized Website development project.

Restructuring and other charges. In August 2015, the Company received a one year notice of termination under which the landlord elected to terminate The Deal’s office space lease. As a result, the Company is no longer obligated to fulfill the original full lease term. As such, the Company recorded an adjustment to its 2012 Restructuring reserve totaling approximately $1.2 million, resulting in a restructuring and other charges credit on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company is also entitled to receive a lease termination fee of approximately $583 thousand from the landlord when the office space is vacated. The Company did not incur any restructuring and other charges during the year ended December 31, 2014.

Net Interest Income

  For the Year Ended December 31,    
  2015  2014  

Percent

Change

 
Net interest (expense) income $(122,637) $88,993   -238%

The change in net interest (expense) income was the result of higher interest expense related to the accretion of certain accrued expenses that were recorded in connection with prior acquisitions and lower interest income due to reduced marketable security and cash balances.

Provision for Income Taxes

Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2015 totaled approximately $1.2 million, as compared to income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2014 totaling approximately $475 thousand, and reflects an effective tax rate of -327% and -14%, respectively. Income tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 primarily relates to the recognition of approximately $1.2 million and $441 thousand, respectively, of a deferred tax liability related to goodwill that is amortized for income tax but not amortized for financial reporting purposes, as well as the recognition of approximately $4 thousand and $34 thousand, respectively, of income tax expense related to the operations of MDL in certain jurisdictions where there are no net operating losses available to offset taxable income.

27

Net Loss Attributable to Common Stockholders

Net loss attributable to common stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2015 totaled approximately $1.9 million, or $0.06 per basic and diluted share, as compared to net loss attributable to common stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2014 totaling approximately $4.2 million, or $0.12 per basic and diluted share.

Comparison of Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013

Revenue

   For the Year Ended December 31,      
Revenue:  2014   Percent
of Total
Revenue
  2013  Percent
of Total
Revenue
  Percent
Change
 
Subscription services $48,035,953   79% $43,549,359   80%  10%
Media  13,017,265   21%  10,901,052   20%  19%
  Total revenue $61,053,218   100% $54,450,411   100%  12%

Subscription services.Subscription services revenue for the year ended December 31, 2014 increased by approximately $4.5 million, or 10%, when compared to the year ended December 31, 2013. The increase was the result of approximately $1.6 million of additional revenue related to the operations of MDL since its acquisition. Excluding MDL, revenue for the year ended December 31, 2014 increased by approximately $2.9 million, or 7%, when compared to the year ended December 31, 2013. The increase was primarily related to a 14% increase in the weighted-average number of subscriptions, partially offset by a 6% decrease in the average revenue recognized per subscription. The increase in the weighted average number of subscriptions was due to new subscribers to the Company’s newsletter products, primarily from the introduction of several new newsletters in the second half of 2013. The decrease in the average revenue recognized per subscription during the period was primarily the result of the mix of products sold and the introduction of several newsletter products at lower prices.

Media. Media revenue for the year ended December 31, 2014 increased by approximately $2.1 million, or 19%, when compared to the year ended December 31, 2013. The increase was primarily the result of additional ad units and increased pricing on certain units which resulted from higher demand from repeat and non-repeat advertisers. Media revenue includes approximately $8 thousand of barter revenue in the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to approximately $94 thousand of barter revenue in the year ended December 31, 2013.

28

Operating Expense

  For the Year Ended December 31,    
  2014  Percent
of Total
Revenue
  2013  Percent
of Total
Revenue
  Percent
Change
 
Operating expense:   ��                
Cost of services $31,730,740   52% $27,431,566   50%  16%
Sales and marketing  15,600,129   26%  14,453,465   27%  8%
General and administrative  13,946,681   23%  12,218,964   22%  14%
Depreciation and amortization  3,179,377   5%  3,768,536   7%  -16%
Restructuring and other charges        385,610   1%  -100%
Loss (gain) on disposition of assets        187,434   0%  -100%
Total operating expense $64,456,927      $58,445,575       10%

Cost of services.Cost of services expense increased by approximately $4.3 million, or 16%, over the period. The increase was the result of approximately $862 thousand of additional cost related to the operations of MDL since its acquisition combined with transaction related costs. Excluding MDL and transaction related costs, cost of services expense for the year ended December 31, 2014 increased by approximately $3.4 million, or 13%, when compared to the year ended December 31, 2013. The increase was primarily the result of increased compensation and related expense due to a 17% decrease5% increase in average headcount combined with(excluding the impact of MDL headcount), fees paid to outside contributors, consulting fees and recruiting costs, the aggregate of which increased by approximately $4.6 million. These cost increases were partially offset by lower third-party datarevenue share payments made to certain distribution partners, and recruitingreduced computer services and supplies costs, the aggregate of which decreased by approximately $971 thousand.

Sales and marketing.Sales and marketing expense increased by approximately $1.1 million, or 8%, over the period. The increase was the result of approximately $289 thousand of additional cost related to the operations of MDL since its acquisition combined with transaction related costs. Excluding MDL and transaction related costs, sales and marketing expense for the year ended December 31, 2014 increased by approximately $858 thousand, or 6%, when compared to the year ended December 31, 2013. The increase was the result of higher advertising and promotion, employee benefit and bonus payments, public relations and advertisement serving costs, the aggregate of which increased by $1.3 million. These cost increases were partially offset by reduced salary costs due to a 2% decrease in average headcount (excluding the impact of MDL headcount), and lower travel and entertainment costs, the aggregate of which decreased by approximately $503 thousand. Sales and marketing expense includes approximately $8 thousand of barter expense in the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to approximately $94 thousand in the year ended December 31, 2013.

General and administrative. General and administrative expense increased by approximately $1.7 million, or 14%, over the period. The increase was the result of approximately $1.5 million of additional cost related to the operations of MDL since its acquisition combined with transaction related costs. Excluding MDL and transaction related costs, general and administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2014 increased by approximately $265 thousand, or 2%, when compared to the year ended December 31, 2013. The increase was primarily the result of higher compensation expense primarily related to bonus payments and increased employee benefit costs, contributions made by the Company to TheStreet Foundation, costs to host an industry conference and bad debt expense, the aggregate of which increased by approximately $1.0 million. These cost increases were partially offset by reduced professional fees, consulting, tax and occupancy related costs, the aggregate of which decreased by approximately $818 thousand.

29

  

Depreciation and amortization.Depreciation and amortization expense decreased by approximately $1.7 million,$589 thousand, or 32%16%, over the periods.period. The decrease was primarily the result of an overall reduced level of capital expenditures over the past few years combined with increased amortization during the year ended December 31, 2012 resulting from reductions to the estimated useful life of certain capitalized Website development projects. These reductions were partially offset by increased depreciation and amortization expense related to The Dealthe purchases of MDL and DealFlow.assets from DealFlow Media, Inc.

 

Restructuring and other charges. The Company did not incur any restructuring and other charges during the year ended December 31, 2014. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recognized restructuring and other charges totaling approximately $386 thousand primarily related to noncash stock-based compensation costs in connection with the accelerated vesting of certain restricted stock units for a terminated employee. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company implemented a targeted reduction in force. Additionally, in accessing the ongoing needs of the organization, the Company elected to discontinue using certain software as a service, consulting and data providers, and elected to write-off certain previously capitalized software development projects. The actions were taken after a review of the Company’s cost structure with the goal of better aligning the cost structure with the Company’s revenue base. These restructuring efforts resulted in restructuring and other charges from continuing operations of approximately $3.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2012. Additionally, as a result of the Company’s acquisition of The Deal, the Company discontinued the use of The Deal’s office space and implemented a reduction in force to eliminate redundant positions,

26

resulting in restructuring and other charges from continuing operations of approximately $3.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2012. These activities were offset by a reduction to previously estimated restructuring and other charges resulting in a net credit of approximately $289 thousand.

Loss (gain) on disposition of assets.The Company did not incur any loss (gain) during the year ended December 31, 2014. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company sold certain non-strategic assets resulting in a loss of approximately $187 thousand. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company sold certain non-strategic assets resulting in a gain of approximately $233 thousand.

 

Net Interest Income

  For the Year Ended December 31,    
  2013  2012  Percent
Change
 
Net interest income $209,463  $352,713   -41%
  For the Year Ended December 31,    
  2014  2013  

Percent

Change

 
Net interest income $88,993  $209,463   -58%

 

The decrease in net interest income was primarily the result of reduced average marketable security,securities balances, decreased cash and restricted cash balances during the year ended December 31, 2013 as compareddue to the prior year period,acquisition of MDL, lower interest rates, and interest expense related to the net present value calculationaccretion of certain restructuring costsaccrued expenses that were recorded during 2012.in connection with prior acquisitions.

 

Net Loss Attributable to Common Stockholders

 

Net loss attributable to common stockholders for the year ended December 31, 20132014 totaled $3.8$4.2 million, or $0.11$0.12 per basic and diluted share, compared to net loss attributable to common stockholders totaling $12.7$3.8 million, or $0.38$0.11 per basic and diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2012. The decrease in the net loss was primarily the result of restructuring and other charges recorded during the year ended December 31, 2012 that approximated $6.6 million.

2013.

Comparison of Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

Revenue

  For the Year Ended December 31,    
  2012  Percent
of Total
Revenue
  2011  Percent
of Total
Revenue
  Percent
Change
 
Revenue:                    
Subscription services $37,149,143   73% $38,901,289   67%  -5%
Media  13,571,660   27%  18,858,711   33%  -28%
Total revenue $50,720,803   100% $57,760,000   100%  -12%

Subscription services.Subscription services revenue for the year ended December 31, 2012 decreased by 5% when compared to the year ended December 31, 2011. This decrease was primarily the result of a 15% decrease in the weighted-average number of subscriptions during the year ended December 31, 2012 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2011, partially offset by a 6% increase in the average revenue recognized per subscription during the year ended December 31, 2012 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2011, combined with approximately $2.9 million of revenue related to the operations of The Deal since its acquisition in September 2012. The decrease in the weighted average number of subscriptions was primarily impacted by the trailing twelve month trends of 1) churn of our existing subscriber base and 2) our ability to acquire new subscribers. While our average monthly churn rates for the trailing twelve months ended December 31, 2012, as compared to the same period in

27

the prior year, has remained relatively stable, we were unable to acquire a sufficient number of new subscribers in 2012 to offset the losses due to churn. The increase in the average revenue recognized per subscription during the period is primarily the result of the mix of products sold and higher product pricing.

Media. Media revenue for the year ended December 31, 2012 decreased by 28% when compared to the year ended December 31, 2011. The decrease in media revenue was primarily the result of reduced demand from repeat advertisers, the movement of Internet usage from desktop to tablets and mobile devices, where advertising rates are lower, and our inability to attract a sufficient amount of advertising revenue from new advertisers in 2012 to offset the losses. There was no barter revenue in the year ended December 31, 2012 as compared to approximately $410 thousand in the year ended December 31, 2011.

Operating Expense

  For the Year Ended December 31,    
  2012  Percent
of Total
Revenue
  2011  Percent
of Total
Revenue
  Percent
Change
 
Operating expense:                    
Cost of services $24,886,142   49% $26,499,085   46%  -6%
Sales and marketing  13,395,328   26%  16,681,562   29%  -20%
General and administrative  13,637,895   27%  15,810,994   27%  -14%
Depreciation and amortization  5,512,299   11%  5,757,365   10%  -4%
Restructuring and other charges  6,589,792   13%  1,825,799   3%  261%
Gain on disposition of assets  (232,989)  0%     N/A   N/A 
Total operating expense $63,788,467      $66,574,805       -4%

Cost of services.Cost of services expense decreased by approximately $1.6 million, or 6%, over the periods. The decrease was primarily the result of reduced compensation expense due to a 25% decrease in average headcount (excluding the impact of acquired headcount of The Deal), combined with lower costs related to computer services and supplies and data used on the Company’s Websites, the aggregate of which decreased by approximately $4.4 million. These cost decreases were partially offset by costs associated with the operations of The Deal since its acquisition, increased costs related to revenue share payments made to certain distribution partners, as well as the use of nonemployee content providers as the Company has shifted its strategy more towards a contributor/freelance model with fewer full time editorial staff, the aggregate of which increased by approximately $2.8 million. Although the dollar amount of cost of services expense decreased over the periods, cost of services expense as a percentage of revenue increased to 49% in the year ended December 31, 2012, from 46% in the prior year period, as our cost cutting initiatives did not completely keep pace with the decline in revenue.

Sales and marketing.Sales and marketing expense decreased by approximately $3.3 million, or 20%, over the periods. The decrease was primarily the result of reduced compensation expense due to a 22% decrease in average headcount (excluding the impact of headcount of The Deal), combined with reductions in advertising and promotion related spending, travel and entertainment costs, credit card processing fees, public relations costs and recruiting fees, the aggregate of which decreased by approximately $4.6 million. These cost decreases were partially offset by costs associated with the operations of The Deal since its acquisition as well as increased advertisement serving costs, the aggregate of which increased by approximately $1.3 million. Sales and marketing expense includes approximately $183 thousand and $303 thousand of barter expense in the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Sales and

28

marketing expense as a percentage of revenue decreased to 26% in the year ended December 31, 2012, from 29% in the prior year period resulting from our cost cutting initiatives.

General and administrative. General and administrative expense decreased by approximately $2.2 million, or 14%, over the periods. The decrease was primarily the result of reduced compensation expense due to a 15% decrease in average headcount (excluding the impact of headcount of The Deal), combined with lower professional fees (inclusive of those relating to a review of certain accounting matters in our former Promotions.com subsidiary), occupancy, training and insurance costs, the aggregate sum of which decreased by approximately $2.7 million. These cost decreases were partially offset by costs related to the Company’s acquisition and subsequent operation of The Deal since its acquisition combined with increased recruiting fees, the aggregate of which increased by approximately $709 thousand. General and administrative expense as a percentage of revenue approximated 27% in the year ended December 31, 2012, the same as in the prior year period, as our cost cutting initiatives were in line with the decline in revenue.

Depreciation and amortization.Depreciation and amortization expense decreased by approximately $245 thousand, or 4%, over the periods. Depreciation and amortization expense as a percentage of revenue approximated 11% in the year ended December 31, 2012, as compared to 10% in the prior year period.

Restructuring and other charges. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company implemented a targeted reduction in force. Additionally, in accessing the ongoing needs of the organization, the Company elected to discontinue using certain software as a service, consulting and data providers, and elected to write-off certain previously capitalized software development projects. The actions were taken after a review of the Company’s cost structure with the goal of better aligning the cost structure with the Company’s revenue base. These restructuring efforts resulted in restructuring and other charges from continuing operations of approximately $3.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2012. Additionally, as a result of the Company’s acquisition of The Deal, the Company discontinued the use of The Deal’s office space and implemented a reduction in force to eliminate redundant positions, resulting in restructuring and other charges from continuing operations of approximately $3.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2012. These activities were offset by a reduction to previously estimated restructuring and other charges resulting in a net credit of approximately $289 thousand.

Gain on disposition of assets.During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company sold certain non-strategic assets resulting in a gain of approximately $233 thousand.

Net Interest Income

  For the Year Ended December 31,    
  2012  2011  Percent
Change
 
Net interest income $352,713  $667,822   -47%

The decrease in net interest income was primarily the result of lower interest rates on bank deposits combined with reduced cash balances.

Net Loss

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2012 totaled approximately $12.7 million, or $0.38 per basic and diluted share, compared to net loss totaling $8.2 million, or $0.26 per basic and diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase in the net loss was largely the result of restructuring

29

and other charges recorded during the year ended December 31, 2012 that approximated $6.6 million combined with reduced revenue, partially offset by expense cost cutting measures. Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2012 also included a net loss of approximately $753 thousand related to the operations of The Deal since its acquisition. Excluding noncash charges related to depreciation, and amortization of acquired intangible assets, net loss for The Deal would have approximated $438 thousand.

Critical Accounting Estimates

General

 

The Company’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon its consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically and the effects of revisions are reflected in the consolidated financial statements in the period they are deemed to be necessary. Significant estimates made in the accompanying consolidated financial statements include, but are not limited to, the following:

 

30

Revenue Recognition

 

We generate our revenue primarily from subscription services and media.

 

Subscription services revenue is comprised of subscriptions, licenses and fees for access to securities investment information, stock market commentary, rate services, director and officer profiles, relationship capital management services, and transactional information pertaining to the mergers and acquisitions and other changes in the corporate control environment. Subscriptions are generally charged to customers’ credit cards or are directly billed to corporate subscribers. Thesesubscribers, and are generally billed in advance on a monthly, quarterly or annual basis. We calculate net subscription revenue by deducting from gross revenue an estimate of potential refunds from cancelled subscriptions as well as chargebacks of disputed credit card charges. Net subscription revenue is recognized ratably over the subscription periods. Deferred revenue relates to payments for subscription fees for which amounts have been collected but for which revenue has not been recognized because services have not yet been provided.

 

Subscription services revenue is subject to estimation and variability due to the fact that, in the normal course of business, subscribers may for various reasons contact us or their credit card companies to request a refund or other adjustment for a previously purchased subscription. With respect to many of our annual newsletter subscription products, we offer the ability to receive a refund during the first 30 days but none thereafter. Accordingly, we maintain a provision for estimated future revenue reductions resulting from expected refunds and chargebacks related to subscriptions for which revenue was recognized in a prior period. The calculation of this provision is based upon historical trends and is reevaluated each quarter. The provision was not material for any of the three years ended December 31, 2013.2015.

 

Media revenue includesis comprised of fees charged for the placement of advertising revenue, which is derived from the sale of Internet sponsorship arrangements and from the delivery of banner, tile, contextual, performance-basedsponsorships within TheStreet and interactive advertisementits affiliated properties, our subscription and sponsorship placements in our advertising-supported Websites,institutional services, and other miscellaneous revenue. Media revenue is recognized as the advertising or sponsorship is displayed, provided that collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.

30

Capitalized Software and Website Development Costs

 

We expense all costs incurred in the preliminary project stage for software developed for internal use and capitalize all external direct costs of materials and services consumed in developing or obtaining internal-use computer software in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 350,Intangibles – Goodwill and Other(“ASC 350”). In addition, for employees who are directly associated with and who devote time to internal-use computer software projects, to the extent of the time spent directly on the project, we capitalize payroll and payroll-related costs of such employees incurred once the development has reached the applications development stage. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122015, 2014 and 2011,2013, we capitalized software development costs totaling approximately $289$486 thousand, $401$408 thousand and $885$289 thousand, respectively. All costs incurred for upgrades, maintenance and enhancements that do not result in additional functionality are expensed.

 

We also account for our Website development costs under ASC 350, which provides guidance on the accounting for the costs of development of company Websites, dividing the Website development costs into five stages: (1) the planning stage, during which the business and/or project plan is formulated and functionalities, necessary hardware and technology are determined, (2) the Website application and infrastructure development stage, which involves acquiring or developing hardware and software to operate the Website, (3) the graphics development stage, during which the initial graphics and layout of each page are designed and coded, (4) the content development stage, during which the information to be presented on the Website, which may be either textual or graphical in nature, is developed, and (5) the operating stage, during which training, administration, maintenance and other costs to operate the existing Website are incurred. The costs incurred in the Website application and infrastructure stage, the graphics development stage and the content development stage are capitalized; all other costs are expensed as incurred. Amortization of capitalized costs will not commence until the project is completed and placed into service. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122015, 2014 and 2011,2013, we capitalized Website development costs totaling approximately $1.8 million, $1.2 million and $443 thousand, $100 thousand and $369 thousand, respectively.

31

  

Capitalized software and Website development costs are amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the software or Website. DuringWebsite, which varies based upon the year ended December 31, 2013, completed capitalized software and Website development projects were deemed to primarily have a three-year useful life.project. Total amortization expense was approximately $1.0 million, $428 thousand and $743 thousand, $1.5 million and $2.2 million, for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122015, 2014 and 2011,2013, respectively.

Goodwill and OtherIndefinite Lived Intangible Assets

 

Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the value assigned to the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets of businesses acquired.  Under the provisions of ASC 350, goodwill and otherindefinite lived intangible assets with indefinite lives are required to be tested for impairment on an annual basis and between annual tests whenever circumstances arise that indicate a possible impairment might exist.  We perform our annual impairment tests of goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets as of October 1 each year. Impairment exists when the carrying amount of goodwill and otherindefinite lived intangible assets with indefinite lives exceed their implied fair value, resulting in an impairment charge for this excess.

 

We evaluate goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives for impairment using a two-step impairment test approach at the Company level, as the Company is considered to operate as a single reporting unit. The first step compares the fair value of the Company with its book value, including goodwill. As outlined in ASC 350, if the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered impaired and the second step of the impairment

31

test is unnecessary. As we concluded that our goodwill was not impaired as of the valuation date, step two was not performed.

 

We perform annual impairment tests of goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives as of September 30 each year and between annual tests whenever circumstances arise that indicate a possible impairment might exist. In conducting our 2015 annual 2013goodwill impairment test throughwith the assistance of our independent appraisal firm, we used the market approach for the valuation of our common stock and the income approach for our preferred shares. We also performed an income approach by using the discounted cash flow (“DCF”) method to confirm the reasonableness of the results of the common stock market approach. Based on these approaches, we determined the Company’s business enterprise value (common equity plus preferred equity) to be $117.6$107.4 million as of the Valuation Date.valuation date. We calculated the common equity value using the midpoint of the Company’s high and low common stock prices on the Valuation Date,valuation date, as shown in the following figure:

 

AVERAGE STOCK PRICE
Average Stock Price – October 1, 2015   
Low stock price $2.05  $1.60 
High stock price $2.09  $1.68 
Average stock price $2.07  $1.64 

 

We multiplied the average stock price of $2.07$1.64 by the 33,902,02834,856,369 common shares outstanding, indicating a common equity value of $70.2$57.2 million on a non-controlling basis. In order to determine the value of the common equity on a controlling basis, a control premium was applied. We searched the FactSet MergerStat/BVR Control Premium Study for all transactions involving U.S. companies during the past 12 months, and for transactions involving U.S. companies with the same SIC code as the Company over various time periods. The data indicated a wide range of control premiums, ranging from 13 percent to 44 percent for deals that have taken place in the last three years, and we conservatively selected 1020 percent as an appropriate control premium. Applying a control premium of 1020 percent resulted in a value of the common equity on a controlling basis of $77.2$68.6 million.

32

  

In addition to Common Stock, we have preferred stock with a liquidation value of $55.0 million. With the assistance of our third party valuation firm, we used the income approach to compute the fair value of the Preferred Stock to be $40.4$38.8 million which we added to the fair value of the Common Stock. The resulting enterprise value of $117.6$107.4 million represents the value of the Company on a controlling basis. This value was greater than the carrying value of $78.1$70.2 million, indicating our goodwill was not impaired as of the September 30, 2013October 1, 2015 valuation date.

 

The fair value of our outstanding preferred shares requires significant judgments, including the estimation of the amount of time until a liquidation event occurs as well as an appropriate cash flow discount rate. Further, in assigning a fair value to our preferred stock, we also considered that the preferred shareholders are entitled to receive a $55 million liquidation preference upon liquidation or dissolution of the Company or upon any change of control event (as defined in the Certificate of Designation of Series B Preferred Stock). Additionally, the holders of the preferred shares are entitled to receive dividends and to vote as a single class together with the holders of the Common Stock on an as-converted basis and, provided certain preferred share ownership levels are maintained, are entitled to representation on our board of directors and may unilaterally block issuance of certain classes of capital stock, the purchase or redemption of certain classes of capital stock, including Common Stock (with certain exceptions), and any increases in the per-share amount of dividends payable to the holders of the Common Stock.

In conducting our 2015 annual indefinite lived intangible asset impairment test with the assistance of our independent appraisal firm, we determined its fair value using the relief-from-royalty method. This analysis calculated the fair value as the present value of the future expenses avoided by owning the indefinite lived trade name rather than having to license its use. We selected an appropriate royalty rate by reviewing licensing transactions for similar assets between service businesses, with a focus on companies that operate in industries similar to ours. Based upon the analysis, we concluded that the book value of the indefinite lived trade name was not impaired as of the October 1, 2015 valuation date.

 

Determining the fair value of goodwill or other intangible assets with indefinite lives involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. Theseassumptions.These estimates and assumptions include revenue growth

32

rates and operating margins used to calculate projected future cash flows, risk-adjusted discount rates, future economic and market conditions, and appropriate market comparables. Wecomparables.We base our fair value estimates on assumptions believed to be reasonable. However,reasonable.However, as these estimates and assumptions are unpredictable and inherently uncertain, actual future results may differ from these estimates.

As of December 31, 2012, we performed an interim impairment test of our goodwill due to certain potential impairment indicators, including the loss of certain key personnel. The fair value of our goodwill was estimated using a market approach, based upon actual prices of our Common Stock excluding any control premium, and the estimated fair value of our outstanding preferred shares. As a result of this December 31, 2012 impairment test, we concluded that goodwill was not impaired.

 

A decrease in the price of our Common Stock, or changes in the estimated value of our preferred shares, could materially affect the determination of the fair value and could result in an impairment charge to reduce the carrying value of goodwill, which could be material to our financial position and results of operations.

 

Additionally, we evaluate the remaining useful lives of intangible assets each year to determine whether events or circumstances continue to support their useful life.  There have been no changes in useful lives of intangible assets for each period presented.

Long-Lived Assets

 

We evaluate long-lived assets, including amortizable identifiable intangible assets, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Upon such an occurrence, recoverability of assets is measured by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to forecasted undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset.  If the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.

33

 

Investments

 

We believe that conservative investment policies are appropriate and we are not motivated to strive for aggressive spreads above Treasury rates. Preservation of capital is of foremost concern, and by restricting investments to investment grade securities of relatively short maturities, we believe that our capital will be largely protected from severe economic conditions or drastic shifts in interest rates. A high degree of diversification adds further controls over capital risk.

 

Financial instruments that subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash. We maintain all of our cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash in four domesticseven financial institutions and we perform periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of these institutions. As of December 31, 2013,2015, our cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash primarily consisted of money market funds and checking accounts.

 

MarketableAs of December 31, 2015, marketable securities consist of liquid short-term U.S. Treasuries, government agencies, certificates of deposit (insured up to FDIC limits), investment grade corporate and municipal bonds, corporate floating rate notes and two municipal auction rate securities (“ARS”) issued by the District of Columbia with a parcost basis of approximately $1.9 million and a fair value of approximately $1.9$1.6 million. As of December 31, 2014, marketable securities also included an investment grade corporate bond, and the aggregate cost basis of these marketable securities was approximately $3.9 million and the aggregate fair value was approximately $3.6 million. The decrease in marketable securities was due to our non-reinvesting the proceeds as securities matured. With the exception of the ARS, the maximum maturity for any investment is three years. The ARS mature in the year 2038. We account for our marketable securities in accordance with the provisions of ASC 320-10. We classify these securities as available for sale and the securities are reported at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive incomeloss and excluded from net loss. As of December

33

31, 2013, the total fair value of these marketable securities was approximately $13.1 million and the total cost basis was approximately $13.3 million.

 

During 2008, we made an investment in Debtfolio, Inc. (‘Debtfolio”), doing business as Geezeo, an online financial management solutions provider for banks and credit unions. The investment totaled approximately $1.9 million for an 18.5% ownership stake. Additionally, we incurred approximately $0.2 million of legal fees in connection with this investment. During the first quarter of 2009, the carrying value of our investment was written down to fair value based upon an estimate of the market value of our equity in light of Debtfolio’s efforts to raise capital at the time from third parties. The impairment charge approximated $1.5 million. We performed an additional impairment test as of December 31, 2009 and no additional impairment in value was noted. During the three months ended June 30, 2010, we determined it was necessary to record a second impairment charge totaling approximately $555 thousand, writing the value of the investment to zero. This was deemed necessary by management based upon its consideration of Debtfolio, Inc.’sDebtfolio’s continued negative cash flow from operations, current financial position and lack of current liquidity. In October 2011, Debtfolio Inc. repurchased our ownership stake in exchange for a subordinated promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of approximately $0.6 million$555 thousand payable on October 31, 2014. On October 28, 2014, a revised subordinated promissory note with revised repayment terms was agreed to which required cash payments totaling $255 thousand during 2014, and eight quarterly installments of approximately $48 thousand plus 5% simple interest during 2015 and 2016. As of December 31, 20132015, all required payments have been received. As of December 31, 2015 and 2012,2014, we maintain a full valuation allowance against ourthis subordinated promissory note due to the uncertainty of eventual collection.

 

See Note 65 to Consolidated Financial Statements (Fair Value Measurements) for additional information about the investment of our cash.

34

Stock-Based Compensation

 

We account for stock-based compensation underin accordance with ASC 718-10,Share Based Payment Transactions(“ASC 718-10”). This requires that the cost resulting from all share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements based upon estimated fair values.

 

Stock-based compensation expense recognized for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122015, 2014 and 20112013 was approximately $2.1$1.6 million, $2.4$1.8 million and $3.4$2.1 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2013,2015, there was approximately $4.1$1.8 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense remaining to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.41.9 years.

We estimate the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant. The value of stock options granted to employees and directors is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The value of each restricted stock unit under our 2007 Performance Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”) is equal to the closing price per share of our Common Stock on the date of grant. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the requisite service periods.

 

Stock-based compensation expense recognized in our consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122015, 2014 and 20112013 includes compensation expense for all share-based payment awards based upon the estimated grant date fair value. We recognize compensation expense for share-basedstock-based payment awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award. As stock-based compensation expense recognized in the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122015, 2014 and 20112013 is based upon awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. We estimate forfeitures at the time of grant which are revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.

 

We estimate the value of stock option awards on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. This determination is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding

34

expected volatility, risk-free interest rate, and expected dividends. The weighted-average grant date fair value per share of stock option awards granted during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $0.63, $0.48 and $0.89, respectively, using the Black-Scholes model with the weighted-average assumptions presented below. Because option-pricing models require the use of subjective assumptions, changes in these assumptions can materially affect the fair value of the options. The assumptions presented in the table below represent the weighted-average value of the applicable assumption used to value stock option awards at their grant date. In determining the volatility assumption, we used a historical analysis of the volatility of our share price for the preceding period equal to the expected option lives. The expected option lives, which represent the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding, were estimated based upon the “simplified” method for “plain-vanilla” options. The risk-free interest rate assumption was based upon observed interest rates appropriate for the term of our stock option awards. The dividend yield assumption was based on the history and expectation of future dividend payouts. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the requisite service periods. Our estimate of pre-vesting forfeitures is primarily based on our historical experience and is adjusted to reflect actual forfeitures as the options vest. The weighted-average grant date fair value per share of stock option awards granted during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $0.39, $0.44 and $0.63, respectively, using the Black-Scholes model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

 

 For the Year Ended December 31,  For the Year Ended December 31, 
 2013 2012 2011  2015 2014 2013 
Expected option lives  3.7 years   3.5 years   3.5 years   3.0 years   3.6 years   3.7 years 
Expected volatility  40.11%  50.67%  54.86%  35.45%  35.54%  40.11%
Risk-free interest rate  0.85%  0.56%  1.20%  0.97%  1.11%  0.85%
Expected dividends  0.00%  4.27%  3.93%  4.59%  4.22%  0.00%

The value of each restricted stock unit awarded is equal to the closing price per share of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the requisite service periods. The weighted-average grant date fair value per share of restricted stock units granted during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $2.19, $2.23 and $2.06, respectively.

35

  

The impact of stock-based compensation expense has been significant to reported results of operations and per share amounts. Because option-pricing models require the use of subjective assumptions, changes in these assumptions can materially affect the fair value of the options. For each 1% increase in the risk-free interest rate used in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, the resulting estimated impact to our total operating expense for the year ended December 31, 20132015 would have caused an increase of approximately $19,000.$20,000. For each 10% increase in the expected volatility used in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, the resulting estimated impact to our total operating expense for the year ended December 31, 20132015 would have caused an increase of approximately $113,000.$119,000. Because options are expensed over three to five years from the date of grant, the foregoing estimated increases include potential expense for options granted during prior years. In calculating the amount of each variable that is included in the Black-Scholes options-pricing model (i.e., option exercise price, stock price, option term, risk free interest rate, annual dividend rate and volatility), the weighted average of such variable for all grants issued in a given year was used.

 

If factors change and we employ different assumptions in future periods, the compensation expense that we record may differ significantly from what we have recorded in the current period.

Income Taxes

 

We account for our income taxes in accordance with ASC 740-10,Income Taxes(“ASC 740-10”). Under ASC 740-10, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their tax bases. ASC 740-10 also requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized based on all available positive and negative evidence. As of December 31, 20132015 and 2012,2014, we maintain a full valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets due to our prior history of pre-tax losses and uncertainty about the timing of and ability to generate taxable income in the future and our assessment that the realization of the deferred tax assets did not meet the “more likely than not” criterion

35

under ASC 740-10. We expect to continue to maintain a full valuation allowance until, or unless, we can sustain a level of profitability that demonstrates our ability to utilize these assets.

 

ASC 740-10 also prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.  For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities.  Differences between tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return and the benefit recognized and measured pursuant to the interpretation are referred to as “unrecognized benefits.”  A liability is recognized for an unrecognized tax benefit because it represents an enterprise’s potential future obligation to the taxing authority for a tax position that was not recognized as a result of applying the provisions of ASC 740-10. As of December 31, 20132015 and 2012,2014, no liability for unrecognized tax benefits was required to be recorded.

 

Deferred tax assets pertaining to windfall tax benefits on the exercise of share awards and the corresponding credit to additional paid-in capital are recorded if the related tax deduction reduces tax payable.  We have elected the “with-and-without approach” regarding ordering of windfall tax benefits to determine whether the windfall tax benefit did reduce taxes payable in the current year. Under this approach, the windfall tax benefits would be recognized in additional paid-in capital only if an incremental tax benefit is realized after considering all other tax benefits presently available to us.

36

 

Contingencies

 

Accounting for contingencies, including those matters described in the Commitments and Contingencies section of Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, is highly subjective and requires the use of judgments and estimates in assessing their magnitude and likely outcome. In many cases, the outcomes of such matters will be determined by third parties, including governmental or judicial bodies. The provisions made in the consolidated financial statements, as well as the related disclosures, represent management’s best estimate of the then current status of such matters and their potential outcome based on a review of the facts and in consultation with outside legal counsel where deemed appropriate. We would record a material loss contingency in itsour consolidated financial statements if the loss is both probable of occurring and reasonably estimated. We regularly review contingencies and as new information becomes available may, in the future, adjust itsour associated liabilities.

 

Credit Risk of Customers and Business Concentrations

 

Our customers are primarily concentrated in the United States and Europe, and we carry accounts receivable balances. We perform ongoing credit evaluations, generally do not require collateral, and establish an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon factors surrounding the credit risk of customers, historical trends and other information. To date, actual losses have been within management’s expectations.

 

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, 2012 and 2011, no individual clientsingle customer accounted for 10% or more of consolidated revenue. As of December 31, 20132015 and 2012, one client2014, no single customer accounted for more than 10% of our gross accounts receivable balance in each period.balance.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Our current assets at December 31, 20132015 consisted primarily of cash and cash equivalents marketable securities, and accounts receivable. We do not hold inventory. Our current liabilities at December 31, 20132015 consisted primarily of deferred revenue, accrued expenses and accounts payable. At December 31, 2013,2015, our current assets were approximately $61.0$35.7 million, 2.0 times6 percent greater than our

36

current liabilities. With respect to many of our annual newsletter subscription products, we offer the ability to receive a refund during the first 30 days but none thereafter. We do not as a general matter offer refunds for advertising that has run.

 

We generally have invested in money market funds and other short-term, investment grade instruments that are highly liquid and of high quality, with the intent that such funds are available for sale for acquisition and operating purposes. As of December 31, 2013,2015, our cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities and restricted cash amounted to approximately $59.8$30.7 million, representing 55%30% of total assets. Our cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash primarily consisted of money market funds and checking accounts. Our marketable securities consisted of liquid short-term U.S. Treasuries, government agencies, certificates of deposit (insured up to FDIC limits), investment grade corporate andtwo municipal bonds and corporate floating rate notes, with a maximum maturity of three years, and two auction rate securities issued by the District of Columbia with a fair value of approximately $1.6 million that mature in the year 2038. Our total cash-related position is as follows:

 

  December 31, 2013  December 31, 2012 
Cash and cash equivalents $45,443,759  $23,845,360 
Current and noncurrent marketable securities  13,097,735   35,394,318 
Current and noncurrent restricted cash  1,301,000   1,301,000 
Total cash and cash equivalents, current and noncurrent marketable securities and current and noncurrent restricted cash $59,842,494  $60,540,678 
37

 

  December 31,
2015
  December 31,
2014
 
Cash and cash equivalents $28,445,416  $32,459,009 
Current and noncurrent marketable securities  1,590,000   3,569,240 
Current and noncurrent restricted cash  661,250   1,301,000 
Total cash and cash equivalents, current and noncurrent marketable securities and current and noncurrent restricted cash $30,696,666  $37,329,249 

 

Financial instruments that subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash. We maintain all of our cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash in four domesticseven financial institutions, and we perform periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of these institutions.

 

Net cash provided by operating activities totaled approximately $2.5 million$891 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2013,2015, as compared to net cash used inprovided by operating activities totaling approximately $6.2$3.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2012.2014. The improvementreduction in net cash provided by operating activities was primarily related to a decreasethe result of changes in the net loss from operations. Also contributing to the improvement was an increase inbalances of accrued expenses, other liabilities, deferred revenue, resulting from improved subscription salesother receivables, other current liabilities, prepaid expenses and a decrease in other receivables,current assets and accounts receivable over the periods. These declines were partially offset by reducedthe reduction in the Company’s net loss and increased noncash expenses and a decreaseover the periods.

Net cash used in accounts payable primarily related to the timing of invoice payments. Excluding cash payments related to the Company’s restructuring and other charges totalinginvesting activities totaled approximately $1.5 million during$670 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2013,2015, as compared to net cash provided by operating activities totaled approximately $4.0 million.

Net cash provided byused in investing activities oftotaling approximately $19.4$12.4 million for the year ended December 31, 20132014. The reduction in net cash used in investing activities was primarily the result of approximately $22.2 millionthe acquisition of Management Diagnostics Limited in the netprior year period and a reduction in restricted cash, partially offset by fewer maturities of marketable securities partially offset by approximately $1.8 million related to the acquisition of certain assets from DealFlow and approximately $1.1 million ofincreased capital expenditures.

 

Net cash used in financing activities oftotaled approximately $316 thousand$4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 primarily consisted of purchase of treasury stock by retaining2015, essentially flat when compared to the year ended December 31, 2014. Year-over-year changes included a decrease in the shares issuable upon thewithheld on RSU vesting of restricted stock units in connection with minimum taxto pay for withholding requirements, partiallytaxes offset by casha reduction in the proceeds received from the exercise of stock options.

37

We currently have a total of approximately $1.3 million$661 thousand of cash that serves as collateral for outstanding letters of credit, which cash is classified as restricted. The letters of credit serve as security deposits for office space in New York City.

 

We believe that our current cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for at least the next 12 months. We are committed to cash expenditures in an aggregate amount of approximately $4.7$5.2 million through December 31, 2014,2016, in respect of the contractual obligations set forth below under “Commitments and Contingencies.” Additionally, Company has reinstated its payment of a $0.025 quarterly dividend beginning with the first quarter of 2014.

 

As of December 31, 20132015 we had approximately $156$154 million of federal and state net operating loss carryforwards. We maintain a full valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets as management concluded that it was more likely than not that we would not realize the benefit of our deferred tax assets by generating sufficient taxable income in future years. We expect to continue to maintain a full valuation allowance until, or unless, we can sustain a level of profitability that demonstrates our ability to utilize these assets.

38

  

In accordance with Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, the ability to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards could be limited in the event of a change in ownership and as such a portion of the existing net operating loss carryforwards may be subject to limitation.

 

Treasury Stock

 

In December 2000, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $10 million of our Common Stock, from time to time, in private purchases or in the open market. In February 2004, our Board of Directors approved the resumption of the stock repurchase program (the “Program”) under new price and volume parameters, leaving unchanged the maximum amount available for repurchase under the Program. However, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Series B Preferred Stock, voting separately as a single class, is necessary in order for us to repurchase our Common Stock (except for the purchase or redemption from employees, directors and consultants pursuant to agreements providing us with repurchase rights upon termination of their service with us), unless after such purchase we have unrestricted cash (net of all indebtedness for borrowed money, purchase money obligations, promissory notes or bonds) equal to at least two times the product obtained by multiplying the number of shares of Series B Preferred Stock outstanding at the time such dividend is paid by the liquidation preference. During the years ended December 31, 20132015 and 2012,2014, we did not purchase any shares of Common Stock under the Program. Since inception of the Program, we have purchased a total of 5,453,416 shares of Common Stock at an aggregate cost of approximately $7.3 million.

In addition, pursuant to the terms of our 2007 Performance Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”), and certain procedures adopted by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors, in connection with the exercise of stock options by certain of our employees, and the issuance of shares of Common Stock in settlement of vested restricted stock units, we may withhold shares in lieu of payment of the exercise price and/or the minimum amount of applicable withholding taxes then due. Through December 31, 2013,2015, we had withheld an aggregate of 1,348,8831,670,623 shares which have been recorded as treasury stock. In addition, we

We also received an aggregate of 208,270 shares as partial settlement of the working capital and debt adjustment from the acquisition of Corsis Technology Group II LLC, and 3,338 shares as partial settlement of the working capital adjustment from the acquisition of Kikucall, Inc. These shares have also been recorded as treasury stock.

 

Commitments and Contingencies

 

We are committed to cash expenditures in an aggregate amount of approximately $4.7$5.2 million through December 31, 2014,2016, primarily related to operating leases for office space, which expire at various

38

dates through August 31, 2021.January, 2026. Certain leases contain escalation clauses relating to increases in property taxes and maintenance costs. Rent and equipment rental expenses wereexpense was approximately $1.5$2.1 million, $1.5$1.8 million and $1.7$1.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122015, 2014 and 2011,2013, respectively. Additionally, we have agreements with certain of our outside contributors, whose future minimum payments are dependent on the future fulfillment of their services thereunder. As of December 31, 2013,2015, total future minimum cash payments are as follows:

 

  Payments Due by Year 
Payments Due by YearPayments Due by Year
Contractual obligations:  Total  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  

After
2018

  Total  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  After
2020
 
Operating leases  16,708,304  1,872,688  1,819,238  1,967,230  2,557,338  2,622,557  5,869,253 $12,073,785  $2,566,802  $2,419,444  $2,117,147  $1,996,904  $1,987,382  $986,106 
Employment agreementEmployment agreement  10,000,000   2,500,000   2,500,000   2,500,000   2,500,000         5,000,000   2,500,000   2,500,000             
Outside contributorsOutside contributors  391,667   350,000   41,667               137,500   137,500                
Total contractual cash obligationsTotal contractual cash obligations $27,099,971  $4,722,688  $4,360,905  $4,467,230  $5,057,338  $2,622,557  $5,869,253  $17,211,285  $5,204,302  $4,919,444  $2,117,147  $1,996,904  $1,987,382  $986,106 

 

39

Future minimum cash payments for the year ended December 31, 20142016 related to operating leases have been reduced by approximately $733$488 thousand related to payments to be received related to the sublease of office space.

 

See Note 1211 (Commitments and Contingencies) in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of contingencies.

 

New Accounting Pronouncements

 

See Note 1 in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for new accounting pronouncements impacting the Company.

 

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

 

We believe that our market risk exposures are immaterial as we do not have instruments for trading purposes, and reasonable possible near-term changes in market rates or prices will not result in material near-term losses in earnings, material changes in fair values or cash flows for all instruments.

 

We maintain all of our cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash in four domesticseven financial institutions, and we perform periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of these institutions. However, no assurances can be given that the third party institutions will retain acceptable credit ratings or investment practices.

Following our acquisition of MDL, we have greater exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, in particular with respect to the British pound. Accordingly, our results of operations and cash flows are subject to fluctuations due to changes in exchange rates. Fluctuations in currency exchange rates could result in translation gains and losses when we consolidate our results and harm our business. Because we conduct a growing portion of our business outside the U.S. but report our results in U.S. dollars, we face exposure to adverse movements in currency exchange rates, which may cause our revenue and operating results to differ materially from expectations. For example, if the U.S. dollar strengthens relative to the British pound, our non-U.S. revenue and operating results would be adversely affected when translated into U.S. dollars. Conversely, a decline in the U.S. dollar relative to the British pound would increase our non-U.S. revenue and operating results when translated into U.S. dollars. We do not engage in currency hedging or have any positions in derivative instruments to hedge our currency risk.

The effect of a 10% adverse change in exchange rates would have resulted in an approximate $972 thousand reduction to 2015 revenue, with an offsetting reduction to 2015 operating expenses of $544 thousand, and a decrease in the value of the Company’s assets and liabilities of approximately $447 thousand and $529 thousand, respectively.

 

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

 

Our consolidated financial statements required by this item are included in Item 15 of this Report.

 

Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

 

None.

40

 

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

 

(a)Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our interim chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as

39

appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Our management, with the participation of our interim chief executive officer (our principal executive officer) and chief financial officer (our principal financial officer), has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 131-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of December 31, 2013.2015. Based on that evaluation, our management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2013.2015. 

 

(b)Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

(b)Management’s Annual Report on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

 

··pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

·provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of our financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and

·provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

 

Internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements due to its inherent limitations.  Management’sManagement's projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20132015 and in making this assessment used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (1992(2013 Framework) in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Based on thatthe foregoing evaluation, our management concluded that, as of December 31, 2013,2015, our internal control over financial reporting was effective.

41

(c)Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015 has been independently audited by BDO USA, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, and their attestation is included herein.

42

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors and Stockholders

TheStreet, Inc.

New York, New York

We have audited TheStreet, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). TheStreet, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Item 9A, Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting”. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, TheStreet, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015 and our report dated March 9, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion.

/s/ BDO USA, LLP

New York, New York

March 9, 2016

43

  

Item 9B. Other Information.

 

None

40

PART III

 

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

 

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement for our 20142016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Report (the “Proxy Statement”).

 

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

 

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy Statement.

 

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

 

Other than the information provided below, the information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy Statement.

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

Under the terms of the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (the “1998 Plan”), 8,900,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company were reserved for awards of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, restricted stock, deferred stock, restricted stock units, or any combination thereof. Under the terms of the 2007 Plan, 7,750,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company were reserved for awards of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units or other stock-based awards. The 2007 Plan also authorized cash performance awards. Additionally, under the terms of the 2007 Plan, unused shares authorized for award under the 1998 Plan are available for issuance under the 2007 Plan. No further awards will be made under the 1998 Plan. Awards may be granted to such directors, employees and consultants of the Company as the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors shall select in its discretion or delegate management to select. Only employees of the Company are eligible to receive incentive stock options. Awards generally vest over a three- to five-year period and stock options generally have terms of five years. The following table sets forth certain information, as of December 31, 2013,2015, concerning shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance under the 2007 Plan.

 

 Number of securities
to be
issued upon exercise
of outstanding
options
  Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options
  Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
  Number of securities
to be
issued upon exercise
of outstanding
options
  Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options
  Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
 
  (a)   (b)   (c)  (a) (b) (c) 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  3,563,623  $1.14   2,228,156*  2,572,571  $1.35   1,818,675*
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders**  2,350,360  $1.83      1,625,360  $1.77   - 

 

44

*

Aggregate number of shares available for grant under the 2007 Plan, which grants may be in the form of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units or other stock-based awards in the discretion of the Board of Directors, with respect to non-employee director grants, or the Compensation Committee, with respect to all other

41
grants. The 2007 Plan also authorizes cash performance awards.

**Includes inducement option grants made pursuant to NASDAQ Listing Rule 5635(c) to Elisabeth DeMarse for 1,525,360 shares of the Company’s common stock and four other non-executive officers for 825,000 shares of the Company’s common stock..  

 

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

 

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy Statement.

 

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

 

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy Statement.

42

PART IV

 

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

 

(a)1.Consolidated Financial Statements:
  See TheStreet, Inc. Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page F-1.
   
 2.Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules:
  See TheStreet, Inc. Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page F-1.
   
 3.Exhibits:

 

The following exhibits are filed herewith or are incorporatedIncorporated by reference to the Exhibit Index immediately preceding the exhibits previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:attached to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Exhibit Incorporated by Reference
NumberDescriptionFormFile No.ExhibitFiling Date
3.1Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company.8-K000-257793.1March 11, 2013
      
3.2Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company.10-K000-257793.1March 14, 2011
      
3.3Certificate of Amendment dated May 31, 2011 to Restated Certificate of Incorporation.8-K000-2577999.1June 2, 2011
      
3.4Certificate of Designation of the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock, as filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware on November 15, 2007.8-K000-257793.1November 20, 2007
      
4.1Specimen certificate for the Company’s shares of Common Stock.S-1/A333-727994.3April 19, 1999
      
4.2Investor Rights Agreement dated November 15, 2007 by and among the Company, TCV VI, L.P. and TCV Member Fund, L.P.8-K000-257794.1November 20, 2007
      
10.1+Form of Indemnification Agreement for directors and executive officers of the Company.10-K000-2577910.26March 7, 2012
      
10.2+Amended and Restated 2007 Performance Incentive Plan.14A000-25779 April 30, 2013
      
10.3Agreement of Lease, dated July 22, 1999, between 14 Wall Street Holdings 1, LLC (as successor to W12/14 Wall Acquisition Associates LLC) and the Company.10-Q000-2577910.1August 16, 1999
      
10.4Amendment of Lease dated October 31, 2001, between 14 Wall Street Holdings 1, LLC (as successor to W12/14 Wall Acquisition Associates LLC) and the Company.10-K000-2577910.12March 16, 2005
      
10.5Second Amendment of Lease dated March 21, 2007, between 14 Wall Street Holdings 1, LLC and the Company.10-K000-2577910.24March 14, 2008
      
10.6Third Amendment of Lease dated December 31, 2008, between CRP/Capstone 14W Property Owner, L.L.C. and the Company.10-K000-2577910.22March 13, 2009
      
10.7Stock Purchase Agreement dated November 1, 2007 by and among BFPC Newco LLC, Larry Starkweather, Kyle Selberg, Rachelle Zorn, Robert Quinn and Larry Starkweather as Agent.8-K000-257792.1November 6, 2007
43
10.8Securities Purchase Agreement dated November 15, 2007 by and among the Company, TCV VI, L.P. and TCV Member Fund, L.P.8-K000-2577910.1November 20, 2007
      
10.9Equity Interest Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 11, 2012 between TheStreet, Inc. and WPPN, L.P.8-K000-257792.1September 12, 2012
      
10.103+Employment Letter dated as of March 7, 2012 between the Company and Elisabeth DeMarse.10-Q000-2577910.1May 7, 2012
      
10.11+Agreement for Grant of Incentive Stock Options dated as of March 7, 2012 between the Company and Elisabeth DeMarse.10-Q000-2577910.2May 7, 2012
      
10.12+Agreement for Grant of Non-Qualified Stock Options dated as of March 7, 2012 between the Company and Elisabeth DeMarse.10-Q000-2577910.3May 7, 2012
      
10.13+Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of March 7, 2012 between the Company and Elisabeth DeMarse.10-Q000-2577910.4May 7, 2012
      
10.14+Severance Agreement dated as of March 7, 2012 between the Company and Elisabeth DeMarse.10-Q000-2577910.5May 7, 2012
      
10.15+Employment Offer Letter dated as of August 13, 2012 between the Company and Erwin Eichmann.10-K000-2577910.23February 22, 2013
      
10.16+Sign-On Bonus Offer Letter dated as of August 13, 2012 between the Company and Erwin Eichmann.10-K000-2577910.24February 22, 2013
      
10.17+Agreement for Grant of Incentive Stock Option dated as of August 17, 2012 between the Company and Erwin Eichmann10-K000-2577910.25February 22, 2013
      
10.18+Employment Offer Letter dated as of February 1, 2013 between the Company and John C. Ferrara.10-K000-2577910.26February 22, 2013
      
10.19Form of Stock Option Grant Agreement under the Company’s 2007 Performance Incentive Plan.    
      
10.20Form of Agreement of Restricted Stock Units Under the Company’s 2007 Performance Incentive Plan.    
      
10.21Employment Agreement dated as of November 14, 2013 between James J. Cramer and the Company.    
      
10.224Employment Offer Letter dated as of July 18, 2013 between the Company and Vanessa J. Soman.    
      
14.1Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.8-K000-2577914.1January 31, 2005
      
21.1Subsidiaries of the Company.    
      
23.1Consent of BDO USA, LLP.    
      
23.2Consent of KPMG LLP.    
      
31.1Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of CEO.    
      
31.2Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of CFO.    
      
32.1Section 1350 Certification of CEO.    
      
32.2Section 1350 Certification of CFO.    
      
101.INS*XBRL Instance Document    
44
101.SCH*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
 
101.CAL*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Document
101.DEF*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Document
101.LAB*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Document
101.PRE*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Document45 

 

+Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
*Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections
45

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

  TheStreet, Inc.
   
Date: February 28, 2014March 9, 2016By:/s/ Elisabeth DeMarseLawrence S. Kramer
 Name:Elisabeth DeMarse Lawrence S. Kramer
 Title:Chairman and Interim Chief Executive Officer

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Each person whose individual signature appears below hereby authorizes and appoints Lawrence S. Kramer and Eric Lundberg, and each of them, with full power of substitution and resubstitution and full power to act without the other, as his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent to act in his or her name, place and stead and to execute in the name and on behalf of each person, individually and in each capacity stated below, and to file any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing, ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them or their or his substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

 

Signature Title Date
Chairman, and Interim
/s/ Lawrence S. KramerChief Executive Officer
(Lawrence S. Kramer)(principal executive officer)March 9, 2016
     
/s/ Elisabeth DeMarseChairman and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
February 28, 2014
(Elisabeth DeMarse)
/s/ John FerraraEric Lundberg Chief Financial Officer
(principalEric Lundberg) (principal financial officer) February 28, 2014
(John Ferrara)March 9, 2016
     
/s/ Richard Broitman Chief Accounting Officer February 28, 2014March 9, 2016
(Richard Broitman)  (principal accounting officer)  
     
/s/ James J. Cramer Director February 28, 2014March 9, 2016
(James J. Cramer)
/s/ Bowers W. EspyDirectorMarch 9, 2016
(Bowers W. Espy)    
     
/s/ Sarah Fay Director February 28, 2014March 9, 2016
(Sarah Fay)    
     
/s/ Keith B. Hall Director February 28, 2014March 9, 2016
(Keith B. Hall)    
     
/s/ Vivek ShahStephen R. Zacharias Director February 28, 2014March 9, 2016
(Vivek Shah)
/s/ Mark WalshDirectorFebruary 28, 2014
(Mark Walsh)Stephen R. Zacharias)    

46

THESTREET, INC.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 Page
ReportsReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmsFirmF-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20132015 and 20122014F-4F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 20122015, 2014 and 20112013F-5F-4
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 20122015, 2014 and 20112013F-6F-5
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 20122015, 2014 and 20112013F-7F-6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 20122015, 2014 and 20112013F-8F-7
Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsF-10F-9
Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 20122015, 2014 and 20112013F-36F-37

F-1

F-1 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

Board of Directors and Stockholders

TheStreet, Inc.

New York, New York

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsheets of TheStreet, Inc. as of December 31, 20132015 and 2014 and the related consolidated statementstatements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013.2015. In connection with our auditaudits of the financial statements, we have also audited the financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and schedules. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of TheStreet, Inc. at December 31, 2013, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the period ended December 31, 2013, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Also, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

s/s BDO USA, LLP
New York, New York
February 28, 2014
F-2

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
TheStreet, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of TheStreet, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2012. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2012, we also have audited financial statement schedule II. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includesstatements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement presentation.statements and schedule. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.opinion.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of TheStreet, Inc. and subsidiaries as ofat December 31, 2012,2015 and 2014, and the results of theirits operations and theirits cash flows for each of the three years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2012,2015, in conformity with U.S.accounting principles generally accepted accounting principles. in the United States of America.

Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, for each of the years in the two year period ended December 31, 2012, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

 

/s/ KPMG LLPWe also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), TheStreet, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated March 9, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

 

New York, New York
February 22, 2013

/s/ BDO USA, LLP
New York, New York
March 9, 2016

F-2 

 

F-3

THESTREET, INC.

  

THESTREET, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

 December 31,  December 31, 
 2013 2012  2015  2014 
assets                
Current Assets:                
Cash and cash equivalents $45,443,759  $23,845,360  $28,445,416  $32,459,009 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $202,207 as of December 31, 2013 and $165,291 as of December 31, 2012  4,502,344   5,750,753 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $357,417 as of December 31, 2015 and $318,141 as of December 31, 2014  5,102,464   5,103,899 
Marketable securities  9,426,875   18,096,091   -   2,009,240 
Other receivables  299,687   1,134,142   790,148   549,933 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  1,167,029   1,450,742   1,205,708   987,693 
Restricted cash  139,750      161,250   639,750 
Total current assets  60,979,444   50,277,088   35,704,986   41,749,524 
                
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $16,035,351 as of December 31, 2013 and $14,633,037 as of December 31, 2012  4,400,404   5,672,000 
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $4,804,411 as of December 31, 2015 and $4,003,538 as of December 31, 2014  2,773,737   2,926,825 
Marketable securities  3,670,860   17,298,227   1,590,000   1,560,000 
Other assets  21,800   69,957   329,885   77,052 
Goodwill  27,997,286   25,726,239   43,318,670   44,810,467 
Other intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $6,994,772 as of December 31, 2013 and $6,699,283 as of December 31, 2012  10,662,983   11,190,557 
Other intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $15,674,328 as of December 31, 2015 and $12,896,782 as of December 31, 2014  18,674,376   20,147,209 
Restricted cash  1,161,250   1,301,000   500,000   661,250 
Total assets $108,894,027  $111,535,068  $102,891,654  $111,932,327 
        
liabilities and stockholders’ equity                
Current Liabilities:                
Accounts payable $2,352,521  $3,813,955  $2,494,341  $2,474,737 
Accrued expenses  4,338,423   5,921,152   5,161,981   6,279,082 
Deferred revenue  22,122,763   21,080,759   24,738,780   26,427,816 
Other current liabilities  957,741   632,618   1,235,551   1,241,508 
Total current liabilities  29,771,448   31,448,484   33,630,653   36,423,143 
Deferred tax liability  288,000   288,000   1,906,295   728,899 
Other liabilities  4,671,421   4,340,749   5,360,467   6,910,175 
Total liabilities  34,730,869   36,077,233   40,897,415   44,062,217 
                
Stockholders’ Equity                
Preferred stock; $0.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; 5,500 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012; the aggregate liquidation preference as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 totals $55,000,000  55   55 
Common stock; $0.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 41,058,246 shares issued and 34,044,339 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2013, and 39,855,468 shares issued and 33,027,752 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2012  410,582   398,555 
Convertible preferred stock; $0.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; 5,500 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014; the aggregate liquidation preference as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 totals $55,000,000  55   55 
Common stock; $0.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 42,458,779 shares issued and 35,123,132 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2015, and 41,967,369 shares issued and 34,727,641 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2014  424,588   419,674 
Additional paid-in capital  273,861,536   270,943,151   269,524,415   271,943,049 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (178,183)  (128,994)  (1,999,026)  (227,476)
Treasury stock at cost 7,013,907 shares as of December 31, 2013 and 6,827,716 shares as of December 31, 2012  (12,364,460)  (11,974,261)
Treasury stock at cost 7,335,647 shares as of December 31, 2015 and 7,239,728 shares as of December 31, 2014  (13,056,541)  (12,908,943)
Accumulated deficit  (187,566,372)  (183,780,671)  (192,899,252)  (191,356,249)
Total stockholders’ equity  74,163,158   75,457,835   61,994,239   67,870,110 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $108,894,027  $111,535,068  $102,891,654  $111,932,327 

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements

F-3 

THESTREET, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2015  2014  2013 
Net revenue:            
Subscription services $55,205,507  $48,035,953  $43,549,359 
Media  12,450,393   13,017,265   10,901,052 
Total net revenue  67,655,900   61,053,218   54,450,411 
Operating expense:            
Cost of services (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below)  33,615,867   31,730,740   27,431,566 
Sales and marketing  16,190,749   15,600,129   14,453,465 
General and administrative  15,000,439   13,946,681   12,218,964 
Depreciation and amortization  4,309,094   3,179,377   3,768,536 
Restructuring and other charges  (1,221,224)     385,610 
Loss on disposition of assets        187,434 
Total operating expense  67,894,925   64,456,927   58,445,575 
Operating loss  (239,025)  (3,403,709)  (3,995,164)
Net interest (expense) income  (122,637)  88,993   209,463 
Net loss before income taxes  (361,662)  (3,314,716)  (3,785,701)
Provision for income taxes  1,181,341   475,161    
Net loss  (1,543,003)  (3,789,877)  (3,785,701)
Preferred stock cash dividends  385,696   385,696    
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(1,928,699) $(4,175,573) $(3,785,701)
             
Basic and diluted net loss per share:            
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(0.06) $(0.12) $(0.11)
             
Cash dividends declared and paid per common share $0.10  $0.10  $ 
             
Weighted average basic and diluted shares outstanding  34,839,233   34,370,843   33,725,317 

 

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements

F-4

THESTREET, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONSCOMPREHENSIVE LOSS

  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2015  2014  2013 
Net loss $(1,543,003) $(3,789,877) $(3,785,701)
Foreign currency translation (loss) gain  (1,797,794)  58,768    
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities  26,244   (108,061)  (49,189)
Comprehensive loss $(3,314,553) $(3,839,170) $(3,834,890)
             

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements

F-5 

THESTREET, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015, 2014, AND 2013

 

For the Years Ended December 31,
  2013  2012  2011 
Net revenue:            
Subscription services $43,549,359  $37,149,143  $38,901,289 
Media  10,901,052   13,571,660   18,858,711 
Total net revenue  54,450,411   50,720,803   57,760,000 
Operating expense:            
Cost of services  27,431,566   24,886,142   26,499,085 
Sales and marketing  14,453,465   13,395,328   16,681,562 
General and administrative  12,218,964   13,637,895   15,810,994 
Depreciation and amortization  3,768,536   5,512,299   5,757,365 
Restructuring and other charges  385,610   6,589,792   1,825,799 
Loss (gain) on disposition of assets  187,434   (232,989)   
Total operating expense  58,445,575   63,788,467   66,574,805 
Operating loss  (3,995,164)  (13,067,664)  (8,814,805)
Net interest income  209,463   352,713   667,822 
Loss on sales of marketable securities        (35,340)
Loss from continuing operations  (3,785,701)  (12,714,951)  (8,182,323)
Discontinued operations:            
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations        (1,798)
Net loss  (3,785,701)  (12,714,951)  (8,184,121)
Preferred stock cash dividends     192,848   385,696 
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(3,785,701) $(12,907,799) $(8,569,817)
             
Basic and diluted net loss per share:            
Loss from continuing operations $(0.11) $(0.38) $(0.26)
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations        (0.00)
Net loss  (0.11)  (0.38)  (0.26)
Preferred stock cash dividends     (0.01)  (0.01)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(0.11) $(0.39) $(0.27)
Weighted average basic and diluted shares outstanding  33,725,317   32,710,018   31,953,683 
  Common Stock  Series B Preferred Stock     Accumulated Other  Treasury Stock     
  Shares  Par Value  Shares  Par Value  Additional Paid in Capital  Comprehensive Loss  Shares  Cost   Accumulated Deficit   Total Stockholders' Equity 
Balance at December 31, 2012  39,855,468   398,555   5,500   55   270,943,151   (128,994)  (6,827,716)  (11,974,261)  (183,780,671)  75,457,835 
Unrealized loss on marketable securities  -   -   -   -   -   (49,189)  -   -   -   (49,189)
Exercise and issuance of equity grants  793,949   7,939   -   -   66,427   -   (186,191)  (390,199)  -   (315,833)
Issuance of Common Stock for acquisition  408,829   4,088   -   -   776,775   -   -   -   -   780,863 
Stock-based consideration for services  -   -   -   -   2,075,183   -   -   -   -   2,075,183 
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   (3,785,701)  (3,785,701)
Balance at December 31, 2013  41,058,246   410,582   5,500   55   273,861,536   (178,183)  (7,013,907)  (12,364,460)  (187,566,372)  74,163,158 
Unrealized loss on marketable securities  -   -   -   -   -   (108,061)  -   -   -   (108,061)
Foreign currency translation gain  -   -   -   -   -   58,768   -   -   -   58,768 
Exercise and issuance of equity grants  909,123   9,092   -   -   293,885   -   (225,821)  (544,483)  -   (241,506)
Stock-based consideration for services  -   -   -   -   1,774,761   -   -   -   -   1,774,761 
Common stock cash dividends  -   -   -   -   (3,601,437)  -   -   -   -   (3,601,437)
Preferred stock cash dividends  -   -   -   -   (385,696)  -   -   -   -   (385,696)
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   (3,789,877)  (3,789,877)
Balance at December 31, 2014  41,967,369   419,674   5,500   55   271,943,049   (227,476)  (7,239,728)  (12,908,943)  (191,356,249)  67,870,110 
Unrealized gain on marketable securities  -   -   -   -   -   26,244   -   -   -   26,244 
Foreign currency translation loss  -   -   -   -   -   (1,797,794)  -   -   -   (1,797,794)
Exercise and issuance of equity grants  491,410   4,914   -   -   (4,075)  -   (95,919)  (147,598)  -   (146,759)
Stock-based consideration for services  -   -   -   -   1,570,142   -   -   -   -   1,570,142 
Common stock cash dividends  -   -   -   -   (3,599,005)  -   -   -   -   (3,599,005)
Preferred stock cash dividends  -   -   -   -   (385,696)  -   -   -   -   (385,696)
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   (1,543,003)  (1,543,003)
Balance at December 31, 2015  42,458,779  $424,588   5,500  $55  $269,524,415  $(1,999,026)  (7,335,647) $(13,056,541) $(192,899,252) $61,994,239 

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements

F-6 

THESTREET, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2015  2014  2013 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:            
Net loss $(1,543,003) $(3,789,877) $(3,785,701)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:            
Stock-based compensation expense  1,570,142   1,774,761   1,681,988 
Provision for doubtful accounts  280,383   189,992   22,859 
Depreciation and amortization  4,309,094   3,179,377   3,768,536 
Deferred tax  1,177,396   440,899    
Restructuring and other charges        393,195 
Deferred rent  (120,400)  (325,147)  (322,533)
Loss (gain) on disposition of assets        187,434 
Noncash barter activity        20,000 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:            
Accounts receivable  (304,156)  189,008   1,509,138 
Other receivables  (242,563)  573,028   951,116 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  (223,375)  268,677   296,012 
Other assets  (66,556)  14,138   (6,675)
Accounts payable  22,452   73,567   (1,463,684)
Accrued expenses  (1,146,629)  979,331   (1,384,257)
Deferred revenue  (1,109,538)  (144,069)  517,882 
Other current liabilities  (311,049)  212,149   114,950 
Other liabilities  (1,401,639)  (83,749)  (21,908)
Net cash provided by operating activities  890,559   3,552,085   2,478,352 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:            
Sale and maturity of marketable securities  2,005,484   9,420,434   22,247,394 
Purchase of assets from DealFlow Media, Inc.        (1,764,716)
Purchase of Management Diagnostics Limited  50,494   (19,922,072)   
Capital expenditures  (3,365,509)  (1,931,173)  (1,118,679)
Restricted cash  639,750       
Proceeds from the disposition of assets        71,881 
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities  (669,781)  (12,432,811)  19,435,880 

  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2015  2014  2013 
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:            
Cash dividends paid on common stock  (3,539,477)  (3,476,893)   
Cash dividends paid on preferred stock  (385,696)  (385,696)   
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options  839   302,977   74,366 
Shares withheld on RSU vesting to pay for withholding taxes  (147,598)  (544,483)  (390,199)
Net cash used in financing activities  (4,071,932)  (4,104,095)  (315,833)
             
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents  (162,439)  71    
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents  (4,013,593)  (12,984,750)  21,598,399 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period  32,459,009   45,443,759   23,845,360 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $28,445,416  $32,459,009  $45,443,759 
             
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:            
Cash payments made for taxes $223,110  $  $ 
             
Noncash investing and financing activities:            
Stock issued for business combination $  $  $780,863 

 

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements

F-5

THESTREET, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2013  2012  2011 
Net loss $(3,785,701) $(12,714,951) $(8,184,121)
Unrealized (loss) gain on marketable securities  (49,189)  265,606   (725,911)
Comprehensive loss $(3,834,890) $(12,449,345) $(8,910,032)

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements

F-6

THESTREET, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012, AND 2011

  Common Stock  Series B Preferred Stock  Additional  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
  Treasury Stock  Accumulated  Total
Stockholders’
 
  Shares  Par Value  Shares  Par Value  Paid in Capital  Income  Shares  Cost  Deficit  Equity 
Balance at December 31, 2010  37,775,381  $377,754   5,500  $55  $270,644,658  $331,311   (6,107,781) $(10,478,838) $(162,881,599) $97,993,341 
Unrealized loss on marketable securities                 (725,911)           (725,911)
Exercise and issuance of equity grants  686,214   6,862         (6,862)     (222,626)  (531,311)     (531,311)
Stock-based consideration for services              3,425,038               3,425,038 
Common stock cash dividends              (3,446,892)              (3,446,892)
Preferred stock cash dividends              (385,696)              (385,696)
Net loss                          (8,184,121)  (8,184,121)
Balance at December 31, 2011  38,461,595   384,616   5,500   55   270,230,246   (394,600)  (6,330,407)  (11,010,149)  (171,065,720)  88,144,448 
Unrealized gain on marketable securities                 265,606            265,606 
Exercise and issuance of equity grants  1,318,873   13,189         (13,189)     (497,309)  (964,112)     (964,112)
Issuance of Common Stock  75,000   750         134,250               135,000 
Stock-based consideration for services              2,420,928               2,420,928 
Common stock cash dividends              (1,636,236)              (1,636,236)
Preferred stock cash dividends              (192,848)              (192,848)
Net loss                          (12,714,951)  (12,714,951)
Balance at December 31, 2012  39,855,468   398,555   5,500   55   270,943,151   (128,994)  (6,827,716)  (11,974,261)  (183,780,671)  75,457,835 
Unrealized loss on marketable securities                 (49,189)           (49,189)
Exercise and issuance of equity grants  793,949   7,939         66,427      (186,191)  (390,199)     (315,833)
Issuance of Common Stock for acquisition  408,829   4,088         776,775               780,863 
Stock-based consideration for services              2,075,183               2,075,183 
Net loss                          (3,785,701)  (3,785,701)
Balance at December 31, 2013  41,058,246  $410,582   5,500  $55  $273,861,536  $(178,183)  (7,013,907) $(12,364,460) $(187,566,372) $74,163,158 

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements

F-7

THESTREET, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2013  2012  2011 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:            
Net loss $(3,785,701) $(12,714,951) $(8,184,121)
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations        1,798 
Loss from continuing operations  (3,785,701)  (12,714,951)  (8,182,323)
Adjustments to reconcile loss from continuing operations to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:            
Stock-based compensation expense  1,681,988   2,198,713   2,777,886 
Provision for doubtful accounts  81,392   329,870   150,825 
Depreciation and amortization  3,768,536   5,512,299   5,757,365 
Restructuring and other charges  393,195   1,396,695   647,152 
Deferred rent  (322,533)  (319,958)  663,020 
Loss (gain) on disposition of assets  187,434   (232,989)   
Noncash barter activity  20,000   183,270   (107,210)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:            
Accounts receivable  1,450,605   1,125,158   214,891 
Other receivables  951,116   (677,601)  74,870 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  296,012   (294,567)  469,366 
Other assets  (6,675)  39,556   37,904 
Accounts payable  (1,463,684)  1,116,374   (150,305)
Accrued expenses  (1,384,257)  (2,519,154)  (69,262)
Deferred revenue  517,882   (1,100,272)  1,272,137 
Other current liabilities  114,950   (240,830)  6,330 
Other liabilities  (21,908)  24,000    
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations  2,478,352   (6,174,387)  3,562,646 
Net cash used in discontinued operations        (3,669)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  2,478,352   (6,174,387)  3,558,977 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:            
Purchase of marketable securities     (41,151,130)  (24,854,469)
Sale and maturity of marketable securities  22,247,394   34,812,021   52,144,328 
Purchase of The Deal, LLC     (5,430,063)   
Sale of Promotions.com        265,000 
Purchase of assets from DealFlow Media, Inc.  (1,764,716)      
Capital expenditures  (1,118,679)  (1,327,746)  (1,974,406)
Proceeds from the disposition of assets  71,881   249,300    
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  19,435,880   (12,847,618)  25,580,453 
F-8
  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2013  2012  2011 
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:            
Cash dividends paid on common stock     (1,636,236)  (3,446,892)
Cash dividends paid on preferred stock     (192,848)  (385,696)
Restricted cash     660,370    
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options  74,366       
Proceeds from the sale of common stock     135,000    
Shares withheld on RSU vesting to pay for withholding taxes  (390,199)  (964,112)  (531,311)
Net cash used in financing activities  (315,833)  (1,997,826)  (4,363,899)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  21,598,399   (21,019,831)  24,775,531 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period  23,845,360   44,865,191   20,089,660 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $45,443,759  $23,845,360  $44,865,191 
             
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:            
Cash payments made for interest $  $30,028  $ 
             
Noncash investing and financing activities:            
Treasury shares received in settlement of Kikucall, Inc. working capital adjustment $  $  $10,748 
Stock issued for business combination $780,863  $  $ 

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements

F-9

THESTREET, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 20132015

 

(1) Organization, Nature of Business and Summary of Operations and Significant Accounting Policies

 

Organization and Nature of Business

 

TheStreet, Inc. together with its wholly owned subsidiaries (“TheStreet”, “we”, “us” or the “Company”),is a leading digital financial media company focused on the financial and mergers and acquisitions environment. The Company’s collection of digital services provides users, subscribers and advertisers with a variety of content and tools through a range of online, social media, tablet and mobile channels.Our mission is to provide investors and advisors with actionable ideas from the world of investing, finance and business, and dealmakers with sophisticated analysis of the mergers and acquisitions environment, in order to break down information barriers, level the playing field and help all individuals and organizations grow their wealth. Withwealth.With a robust suite of digital services, TheStreet offers the tools and insights needed to make informed decisions about earning, investing, saving and spending money. Since its inception in 1996, TheStreet believes it has distinguished itself from other digitalfinancial media companies with its journalistic excellence, unbiased approach and interactive multimedia coverage of the financial markets, economy, industry trends, investment and financial planning.

 

In June 2005, the Company committed to a plan to discontinue the operations of its wholly-owned subsidiary, Independent Research Group LLC, which operated the Company’s securities research and brokerage segment. Accordingly, the operating results relating to this segment have been segregated from continuing operations and reported as a separate line item on the consolidated statements of operations. See Note 2 to Consolidated Financial Statements (Discontinued Operations). Since that time the Company has only had one reportable operating segment.

Substantially all of the Company’s revenue in 2013, 20122015, 2014 and 20112013 was generated from customers in the United States.States and Europe. During 2015, 2014 and 2013, 2012 and 2011,substantially all of the Company’s long-lived assets were located in the United States.States and Europe.

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically and the effects of revisions are reflected in the consolidated financial statements in the period they are deemed to be necessary. Significant estimates made in the accompanying consolidated financial statements include, but are not limited to, the following:

 

·useful lives of intangible assets,
·useful lives of fixed assets,
·the carrying value of goodwill, intangible assets and marketable securities,
·allowances for doubtful accounts and deferred tax assets,
·accrued expense estimates,
·reserves for estimated tax liabilities,
F-10
·estimates in connection with the allocation of the purchase price of The Deal, LLCManagement Diagnostics Limited and certain assets acquired from DealFlow Media, Inc. to the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed,
·certain estimates and assumptions used in the calculation of the fair value of equity compensation issued to employees, and
·restructuring charges.charges, and
·the calculation of a contingent earn-out payment from the acquisition of Management Diagnostics Limited.

F-9 

 

Consolidation

 

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and include the accounts of TheStreet, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

The Company generates its revenue primarily from subscription services and media.

 

Subscription services revenue is comprised of subscriptions, licenses and fees for access to securities investment information, stock market commentary, rate services, director and officer profiles, relationship capital management services, and transactional information pertaining to the mergers and acquisitions and other changes in the corporate control environment. Subscriptions are generally charged to customers’ credit cards or are directly billed to corporate subscribers. Thesesubscribers, and are generally billed in advance on a monthly, quarterly or annual basis. The Company calculates net subscription revenue by deducting from gross revenue an estimate of potential refunds from cancelled subscriptions as well as chargebacks of disputed credit card charges. Net subscription revenue is recognized ratably over the subscription periods. Deferred revenue relates to payments for subscription fees for which revenue has not been recognized because services have not yet been provided.

 

Subscription services revenue is subject to estimation and variability due to the fact that, in the normal course of business, subscribers may for various reasons contact us or their credit card companies to request a refund or other adjustment for a previously purchased subscription. With respect to many of our annual newsletter subscription products, we offer the ability to receive a refund during the first 30 days but none thereafter. Accordingly, we maintain a provision for estimated future revenue reductions resulting from expected refunds and chargebacks related to subscriptions for which revenue was recognized in a prior period. The calculation of this provision is based upon historical trends and is reevaluated each quarter. The provision was not material for any of the three years ended December 31, 2013.2015.

 

Media revenue includesis comprised of fees charged for the placement of advertising and sponsorships within TheStreet and our affiliated properties, our subscription and institutional services, and other miscellaneous revenue. Media revenue is recognized as the advertising or sponsorship is displayed, provided that collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. Media revenue also includes revenue generated from syndication and licensing of data as well as other miscellaneous, non-subscription related sources.

 

Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash

 

The Company considers all short-term investment-grade securities with original maturities of three months or less from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. TheAs of December 31, 2015, the Company has a total of approximately $1.3 million$661 thousand of cash that serves as collateral for outstanding letters of credit,which cash is classified as restricted. The letters of credit serve as security deposits for the Company’s office space in New York City.

F-11

Property and Equipment

 

Property and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Property and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful life of computer equipment, computer software and telephone equipment is three years;years and of furniture and fixtures is five years; and of capitalized software and Website development costs is variable based upon the applicable project. During the year ended December 31, 2013, completed capitalized software and Website development projects were deemed to have a three year useful life.years. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the respective lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset. If the useful lives of the assets differ materially from the estimates contained herein, additional costs could be incurred, which could have an adverse impact on our expenses.

 

Capitalized Software and Website Development Costs

 

The Company expenses all costs incurred in the preliminary project stage for software developed for internal use and capitalizes all external direct costs of materials and services consumed in developing or obtaining internal-use computer software in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 350,Intangibles – Goodwill and Other(“ASC 350”).In addition, for employees who are directly associated with and who devote time to internal-use computer software projects, to the extent of the time spent directly on the project, the Company capitalizes payroll and payroll-related costs of such employees incurred once the development has reached the applications development stage. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122015, 2014 and 2011,2013, the Company capitalized software development costs totaling approximately $289$486 thousand, $401$408 thousand and $885$289 thousand, respectively. All costs incurred for upgrades, maintenance and enhancements that do not result in additional functionality are expensed.

 

The Company also accounts for its Website development costs under ASC 350, which provides guidance on the accounting for the costs of development of company Websites, dividing the Website development costs into five stages: (1) the planning stage, during which the business and/or project plan is formulated and functionalities, necessary hardware and technology are determined, (2) the Website application and infrastructure development stage, which involves acquiring or developing hardware and software to operate the Website, (3) the graphics development stage, during which the initial graphics and layout of each page are designed and coded, (4) the content development stage, during which the information to be presented on the Website, which may be either textual or graphical in nature, is developed, and (5) the operating stage, during which training, administration, maintenance and other costs to operate the existing Website are incurred. The costs incurred in the Website application and infrastructure stage, the graphics development stage and the content development stage are capitalized; all other costs are expensed as incurred. Amortization of capitalized costs will not commence until the project is completed and placed into service. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122015, 2014 and 2011,2013, the Company capitalized Website development costs totaling approximately $443 thousand, $100 thousand$1.8 million, $1.2 million and $369$443 thousand, respectively.

 

Capitalized software and Website development costs are amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the software or Website.Website, which varies based upon the project. Total amortization expense was approximately $1.0 million, $428 thousand and $743 thousand, $1.5 million and $2.2 million, for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122015, 2014 and 2011,2013, respectively.

 

Goodwill and OtherIndefinite Lived Intangible Assets

 

Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the value assigned to the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets of businesses acquired.  Under the provisions of ASC 350, goodwill and

F-12

indefinite-lived indefinite lived intangible assets are required to be tested for impairment on an annual basis and between annual tests whenever indicationscircumstances arise that indicate a possible impairment might exist.  We perform our annual impairment tests of impairment exist.goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets as of October 1 each year. Impairment exists when the carrying amount of goodwill and indefinite-livedindefinite lived intangible assets exceed their implied fair value, resulting in an impairment charge for this excess.


The Company evaluates goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment using a two-step impairment test approach at the Company level, as the Company is considered to operate as a single reporting unit. In the first step, the fair value of the Company is compared to its book value, including goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets.  If the fair value of the Company is less than the book value, a second step is performed that compares the implied fair value of the Company’sCompany's goodwill and indefinite-livedindefinite lived intangible assets to the book value of the goodwill and indefinite-livedindefinite lived intangible assets.  The fair value for the goodwill and indefinite-livedindefinite lived intangible assets is determined based on the difference between the fair value of the Company and the net fair values of identifiable assets and liabilities.  If the fair value of the goodwill and indefinite-livedindefinite lived intangible assets is less than the book value, the difference is recognized as impairment. We test for goodwill impairment at the enterprise level as the Company is considered to operate as a single reporting unit.

 

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08,Testing for Goodwill Impairment(“ASU 2011-08”). ASU 2011-08 permits an entity to make a qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount before applying the two-step goodwill impairment test. If an entity concludes it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, it need not perform the two-step impairment test. During 2013,2015, the Company elected not to apply the qualitative assessment under this guidance and continued to apply the quantitative assessment in its evaluating of goodwill for impairment.

 

In testing for impairment of goodwill,the fair value of the Company was estimated using a market approach for the valuation of our common stock, based upon actual prices of the Company’s Common Stock, and the income approach for the estimated fair value of the Company’s outstanding Preferred Shares. The Company performsalso performed an income approach to confirm the reasonableness of the common stock market approach by using the discounted cash flow method. Based upon annual impairment tests of goodwillperformed in 2015 and other intangible assets with indefinite lives as of September 30 each year or when circumstances arise that indicate a possible impairment might exist.Based upon its annual impairment test performed as of September 30, 2013 and 2012,2014, no impairment was indicated as the Company’s fair value, inclusive of a control premium, exceeded its book value by approximately 51%53% and 13%62%, respectively. The fair value of the Company was estimated using a market approach, based upon actual prices of the Company’s Common Stock and the estimated fair value of the Company’s outstanding Preferred Shares. We also performed an income approach by using the discounted cash flow method to confirm the reasonableness of the results. The fair value of the Company’s outstanding Preferred Shares requires significant judgments, including the estimation of the amount of time until a liquidation event occurs as well as an appropriate cash flow discount rate. Further, in assigning a fair value to the Company’s Preferred Stock, the Company also considered that the preferred shareholders are entitled to receive a $55 million liquidation preference upon liquidation or dissolution of the Company or upon any change of control event. Additionally, the holders of the Preferred Shares are entitled to receive dividends and to vote as a single class together with the holders of the Common Stock on an as-converted basis and, provided certain preferred share ownership levels are maintained, are entitled to representation on the Company’s board of directors and may unilaterally block issuance of certain classes of capital stock, the purchase or redemption of certain classes of capital stock, including Common Stock (with certain exceptions) and any increases in the per-share amount of dividends payable to the holders of the Common Stock.

As of December 31, 2012, the Company performed an interim impairment test of its goodwill due to certain potential impairment indicators, including the loss of certain key personnel. The fair value of the Company’s goodwill was estimated using a market approach, based upon actual prices of the Company’s Common Stock excluding any control premium, and the estimated fair value of the company’s outstanding preferred shares. As a result of this December 31, 2012 impairment test, the Company concluded that goodwill was not impaired.

F-13

A decrease in the price of the Company’s Common Stock, or changes in the estimated value of the Company’s preferred shares,Preferred Shares, could materially affect the determination of the fair value and could result in an impairment charge to reduce the carrying value of goodwill, which could be material to the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

 

Intesting for impairment of the Company’sindefinite lived intangible asset, the Company determined the fair value using the relief-from-royalty method. This analysis calculated the fair value as the present value of the future expenses avoided by owning the indefinite lived trade name rather than having to license its use. The Company selected an appropriate royalty rate by reviewing licensing transactions for similar trade names and by considering the profitability associated with its operations. Based upon annual impairment tests performed in 2015 and 2014, the Company concluded that the book value of its indefinite lived trade name was not impaired as the fair value exceeded its book value by approximately 129% and 165%, respectively.


Additionally, the Company evaluates the remaining useful lives of intangible assets each year to determine whether events or circumstances continue to support their useful life.  There have been no changes in useful lives of intangible assets for each period presented.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company performed its annual impairment test of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets as of September 30. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company changed the date of its annual impairment test of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets to October 1 in order to allow for a more comprehensive review. The change in the testing date does not represent a material change in the method of applying the accounting policy and such change does not have an effect on the financial statements.

 

Long-Lived Assets

 

The Company evaluates long-lived assets, including amortizable identifiable intangible assets, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Upon such an occurrence, recoverability of assets is measured by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to forecasted undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset.  If the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.  Management does not believe that there was any impairment of long-lived assets atas of December 31, 20132015 and 2012.2014.

 

Income Taxes

 

The Company accounts for its income taxes in accordance with ASC 740-10,Income Taxes(“ASC 740-10”). Under ASC 740-10, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their tax bases. ASC 740-10 also requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized based on all available positive and negative evidence. As of December 31, 20132015 and 2012,2014, we maintainedmaintain a full valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets due to our prior history of pre-tax losses and uncertainty about the timing of and ability to generate taxable income in the future and our assessment that the realization of the deferred tax assets did not meet the “more likely than not” criterion under ASC 740-10. We expect to continue to maintain a full valuation allowance until, or unless, we can sustain a level of profitability that demonstrates our ability to utilize these assets.

 

ASC 740-10 also prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.  For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities.  Differences between tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return and the benefit recognized and measured pursuant to the interpretation are referred to as “unrecognized benefits.”  A liability is recognized for an unrecognized tax benefit because it represents an enterprise’s potential future obligation to the taxing authority for a tax position that was not recognized as a result of applying the provisions of ASC 740-10. As of December 31, 20132015 and 2012,2014, no liability for unrecognized tax benefits was required to be recorded. Interest costs related to unrecognized tax benefits would be classified within “Net interest income” in the consolidated statements of operations. Penalties would be recognized as a component of “General and administrative” expenses.  There is no interest expense or penalty related to tax uncertainties reported in the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122015, 2014 or 2011.2013.


Deferred tax assets pertaining to windfall tax benefits on the exercise of share awards and the corresponding credit to additional paid-in capital are recorded if the related tax deduction reduces tax payable.  The Company has elected the “with-and-without approach” regarding ordering of windfall tax

F-14

benefits to determine whether the windfall tax benefit did reduce taxes payable in the current year.  Under this approach, the windfall tax benefits would be recognized in additional paid-in capital only if an incremental tax benefit is realized after considering all other tax benefits presently available to the Company.

 

The Company files income tax returns in the United States (federal), and in various state and local jurisdictions.jurisdictions, as well as in the United Kingdom and India.  In most instances, the Company is no longer subject to federal, state and local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2010,2012, and is not currently under examination by any federal, state or local jurisdiction.  It is not anticipated that unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The carrying amounts of accounts and other receivables, accounts payable, accrued expenses and deferred revenue approximate fair value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.

 

Business Concentrations and Credit Risk

 

Financial instruments that subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash. The Company maintains all of its cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash in four domesticseven financial institutions, and performs periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of these institutions. As of December 31, 2013,2015, the Company’s cash, cash equivalents and restricted stock primarily consisted of money market funds and checking accounts.

 

For the years endingended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, 2012 and 2011, no individual clientsingle customer accounted for 10% or more of consolidated revenue. As of December 31, 20132015 and 2012, one client2014, no single customer accounted for more than 10% of our gross accounts receivable balance in each period.balance.

 

The Company’s customers are primarily concentrated in the United States and Europe, and we carry accounts receivable balances. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations, generally does not require collateral, and establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon factors surrounding the credit risk of customers, historical trends and other information. To date, actual losses have been within management’s expectations.

 

Other Comprehensive Loss

 

Comprehensive loss is a measure which includes both net loss and other comprehensive loss.  Other comprehensive loss results from items deferred from recognition into the statement of operations.  Accumulated other comprehensive loss is separately presented on the consolidated statement of comprehensive loss and on both the Company’sCompany's consolidated balance sheet and as part of the consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity. Other comprehensive loss consists of unrealized gains and losses on marketable securities classified as available for sale as well as foreign currency translation adjustments from subsidiaries where the local currency is the functional currency.

F-14 

Foreign Currency

The functional currency of the Company’s international subsidiaries is the local currency. The financial statements of these subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars using period-end rates of exchange for assets and liabilities, historical rates of exchange for equity, and average rates of exchange for the period for revenue and expense. Translation gains (losses) are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss as a component of stockholders’ equity. Gains and losses resulting from currency transactions are included in earnings.

 

Net Loss Per Share of Common Stock

 

Basic net loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares and potential common shares outstanding during the period, so long as the inclusion of potential common shares does not result in a lower net loss per share. Potential common shares consist of restricted stock units (using the treasury stock method), the incremental common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options (using the treasury stock method), and the conversion of the Company’s convertible preferred stock and warrants (using the if-converted method). Such warrants to purchase

F-15

Common Stock all expired during the fourth quarter of 2012. For the years ended December 31, 2015 2014 and 2013, 2012approximately 3.1 million, 5.2 million and 2011, approximately 4.2 million, 3.3 million and 4.5 millionrespectively, of unvested restricted stock units, vested and unvested options and warrants to purchase Common Stock, respectively, were excluded from the calculation, as their effect would result in a lower net loss per share.

 

Advertising Costs

 

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122015, 2014 and 2011,2013, advertising expense totaled approximately $2.9$2.6 million, $2.9$3.0 million and $3.7$2.9 million, respectively.

 

Stock-Based Compensation

 

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation underin accordance with ASC 718-10,Share Based Payment Transactions(“ASC 718-10”). This requires that the cost resulting from all share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements based upon estimated fair values.

 

Stock-based compensation expense recognized for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122015, 2014 and 20112013 was approximately $2.1$1.6 million, $2.4$1.8 million and $3.4$2.1 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2013,2015, there was approximately $4.1$1.8 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense remaining to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.41.9 years.

The Company estimates the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant. The value of stock options granted to employees and directors is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The value of each restricted stock unit under the Company’s 2007 Performance Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”) is equal to the closing price per share of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the requisite service periods.

 

Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122015, 2014 and 20112013 includes compensation expense for all share-based payment awards based upon the estimated grant date fair value. The Company recognizes compensation expense for share-based payment awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award. As stock-based compensation expense recognized in the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122015, 2014 and 20112013 is based upon awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. The Company estimates forfeitures at the time of grant which are revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.


The Company estimates the fair value of stock option awards on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. This determination is affected by the Company’s stock price as well as assumptions regarding expected volatility, risk-free interest rate, and expected dividends. The weighted-average grant date fair value per share of stock option awards granted during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $0.63, $0.48 and $0.89, respectively, using the Black-Scholes model with the weighted-average assumptions presented below. Because option-pricing models require the use of subjective assumptions, changes in these assumptions can materially affect the fair value of the options. The assumptions presented in the table below represent the weighted-average value of the applicable assumption used to value stock option awards at their grant date. In determining the volatility assumption, the Company used a historical analysis of the volatility of the Company’s share price for the preceding period equal to the expected option lives. The expected option lives, which represent the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding, were estimated based upon the “simplified” method for “plain-vanilla” options. The risk-free interest rate assumption was based upon observed interest rates appropriate for the term of the Company’s employee stock options.option awards. The dividend yield assumption was based on the history and expectation of future dividend payouts. The periodic expense is determined based on the valuationvalue of the options, and atportion of the award that time an

F-16

estimated forfeiture rate is usedultimately expected to reducevest is recognized as expense over the expense recorded.requisite service periods. The Company’s estimate of pre-vesting forfeitures is primarily based on the Company’s historical experience and is adjusted to reflect actual forfeitures as the options vest. The weighted-average grant date fair value per share of stock option awards granted during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $0.39, $0.44 and $0.63, respectively, using the Black-Scholes model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

 

 For the Year Ended December 31,  For the Year Ended December 31, 
 2013 2012 2011  2015 2014 2013 
Expected option lives  3.7 years   3.5 years   3.5 years   3.0 years   3.6 years   3.7 years 
Expected volatility  40.11%  50.67%  54.86%  35.45%  35.54%  40.11%
Risk-free interest rate  0.85%  0.56%  1.20%  0.97%  1.11%  0.85%
Expected dividends  0.00%  4.27%  3.93%  4.59%  4.22%  0.00%

The value of each restricted stock unit awarded is equal to the closing price per share of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the requisite service periods. The weighted-average grant date fair value per share of restricted stock units granted during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $2.19, $2.23 and $2.06, respectively.

 

The Company utilizes the alternative transition method for calculating the tax effects of stock-based compensation. Under the alternative transition method the Company established the beginning balance of the additional paid-in capital pool (“APIC pool”) related to the tax effects of employee stock-based compensation and then determines the subsequent impact on the APIC pool and cash flows of the tax effects of employee stock-based compensation awards that are outstanding.

 

2007 Performance Incentive Plan

 

In 2007, the Company adopted the 2007 Plan, whereby executive officers, directors, employees and consultants may be eligible to receive cash or equity-based performance awards based on set performance criteria.

 

In 2013, 20122015, 2014 and 2011,2013, the Compensation Committee granted short-term cash performance awards, payable to certain officers upon the Company’s achievement of specified performance goals for such year. The target short-term cash bonus opportunities for officers reflected a percentage of the officer’s base salary. The short-term cash incentives were based upon achievement of certain financial targets, (which, depending upon the year, related to revenue, expense, Adjusted EBITDA or free cash flow, as defined by the Compensation Committee).Committee. Potential payout with respect to each measure was zero if a threshold percentage of the target was not achieved and a sliding scale thereafter, subject to a cap, starting at a figure less than 100% if the threshold was achieved but the target was not met and ending at a figure above 100% if the target was exceeded. Short-term incentives of approximately $599$670 thousand, $577$918 thousand and $1.1 million$599 thousand were deemed earned with respect to the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.


Services Agreement

 

On November 13, 2012, the Company entered into a Services Agreement (the “Agreement”) in which a third-party granted TheStreet an exclusive right to sell and serve advertisement and e-commerce on certain of theirits personal finance Websites. The agreement terminated on May 31, 2013. TheStreet supported the Websites by providing personal finance content, various promotion and advertisements on TheStreet’s Websites, and marketing and accounting support. Under the Agreement, the Company reimbursed this third party for certain expenses, subject to specified limits. Both parties shared in the profits generated by the partnership, after TheStreet recouped the aggregate amount paid to to the third party in addition to certain sales, marketing, editorial and operational costs incurred by the Company.

 

In accordance with the ASC 808, “AccountingAccounting for Collaborative Agreement,” a participant in a collaborative arrangement must report the costs incurred and revenues generated on sales to third parties at gross or net amounts, depending on whether the participant is the principal or the agent in the transaction. Based on the facts and circumstances with regards to the Agreement, the Company has

F-17

determined that it iswas the Principal in this Agreement for all advertising sold by the Company. With respect to the advertising and e-commerce revenue generated by the third party, the Company treatstreated this as a reimbursement of expenses paid. For the periodsyear ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 the Company recognized $264 thousand in net expense reimbursements and $218 thousand in net expense, respectively, reflected in cost of sales on the consolidated statement of operations related to this agreement.

 

Preferred Stock

 

The Company applies the guidance in ASC 480,Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (“ASC 480”) when determining the classification and measurement of its convertible preferred shares. Preferred shares subject to mandatory redemption (if any) are classified as liability instruments and are measured at fair value. Accordingly the Company classifies conditionally redeemable preferred shares (if any), which includes preferred shares that feature redemption rights that are either within the control of the holder or subject to redemption upon the occurrence of uncertain events not solely within the Company’s control, as temporary equity. At all other times, the Company classifies its preferred shares as a component of stockholders’ equity.

 

The Company’s Series B Convertible Preferred Stock does not feature any redemption rights within the holders’ control or conditional redemption features not solely within the Company’s control as of December 31, 2013.2015. Accordingly, the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock is presented as a component of stockholders’ equity.

 

Subsequent Events

 

The Company has evaluated subsequent events for recognition or disclosure.

 

F-17 

New Accounting Pronouncements

 

In July 2012,May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”(“FASB”) issued ASU 2012-02,Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for ImpairmentAccounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASU 2012-02”2014-09”), which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than are required under existing GAAP. On July 9, 2015, the FASB voted to defer the effective date by one year to December 15, 2017 for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after that date.  Early adoption of ASU 2014-09 is permitted but not before the original effective date (annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016). The guidance gives companiesWhen effective, ASU 2014-09 prescribes either of the following transition methods: (i) a full retrospective approach reflecting the application of the standard in each prior reporting period with the option to first performelect certain practical expedients; or (ii) a qualitative assessmentretrospective approach with the cumulative effect of initially adopting ASU 2014-09 recognized at the date of adoption (which includes additional footnote disclosures).  We are currently evaluating the impact of our pending adoption of ASU 2014-09 on our consolidated financial statements and have not yet determined the method by which we will adopt the standard.

In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-01,Income Statement — Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20): Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items(“ASU 2015-01”).ASU 2015-01 eliminates the concept of extraordinary items from GAAP but retains the presentation and disclosure guidance for items that are unusual in nature or occur infrequently and expands the guidance to determine whetherinclude items that are both unusual in nature and infrequently occurring.ASU 2015-01 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015.A reporting entity may apply ASU 2015-01 prospectively. A reporting entity may also apply ASU 2015-01 retrospectively to all periods presented in the financial statements.We believe the adoption of ASU 2015-01 will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In November 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740) Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes (ASU 2015-17). ASU 2015-17 requires entities to present deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities as noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. ASU 2017-17 simplifies the current guidance, which requires entities to separately present deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities as current and noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. The guidance in ASU 2015-17 is required for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within the reporting period. We early adopted the provisions of this ASU during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015 and applied it is more likely thanretrospectively. Adoption of this standard did not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. Ifimpact the qualitative assessment supports that it is more likely than not that the fair valuebalance sheet classification of the Company’s deferred tax liability, results of operations, retained earnings, or cash flows in the current or previous interim and annual reporting periods.

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02,Leases. The new standard establishes a right-of-use (ROU) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset exceeds its carrying amount,and a lease liability on the company would notbalance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be required to perform a quantitative impairment test. Ifclassified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the qualitative assessment does not supportpattern of expense recognition in the fair value of the assets, then a quantitative assessmentincome statement. The new standard is performed. ASU 2012-02 applies to public entities for annual and interim impairment tests performedeffective for fiscal years beginning after SeptemberDecember 15, 2012. The2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. We are currently evaluating the impact of our pending adoption of ASU 2012-02 did not have a material impactthe new standard on the Company’sour consolidated financial statements.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02,Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income(“ASU 2013-02”), to require an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. An entity is required to present, either on the faceof the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated othercomprehensive income by the respective line items of net income if the amount reclassified is required under GAAP to bereclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts that are not required to be reclassifiedin their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures required under GAAP that provideadditional detail about those amounts. This standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15,2012 and is to be applied on a prospective basis. We adopted ASU 2013-02 and will disclose significant amounts reclassifiedout of accumulated other comprehensive income as such transactions arise. ASU

F-18

2013-02 affects financial statementpresentation and has no impact on our results of consolidated financial statements.

Reclassifications

During the three months ended June 30, 2013, the Company started to report certain miscellaneous other revenue items, such as webinars and conferences, as Media rather than Subscription Services revenue. These items andcertain other prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.

(2) Discontinued Operations

In June 2005, the Company committed to a plan to discontinue the operations of the Company’s securities research and brokerage segment. Accordingly, the operating results relating to this segment have been segregated from continuing operations and reported as a separate line item in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Activity related to the discontinued operation was concluded during the year ended December 31, 2011 and there is no further activity to be reported.

For the year ended December 31, 2011, there was no net revenue from discontinued operations. Loss from discontinued operations was immaterial.

(3)Acquisitions

 

The Deal, LLCManagement Diagnostics Limited

 

On September 11, 2012,October 31, 2014, the Company acquired 100%all of the equityoutstanding share capital of Management Diagnostics Limited (“MDL”), a privately held company headquartered in London, England. MDL is the owner of BoardEx, an institutional relationship capital management database and platform. Clients, including investment banks, consultancies and law firms use BoardEx to leverage their relationships and facilitate business and corporate development initiatives. The Deal, LLC (“The Deal”). The Deal is a digital platform that delivers sophisticated coverageCompany paid cash consideration of the mergers and acquisitions environment, primarily through The Deal Pipeline, a leading provider of transactional information services. The purchase price of the acquisition was approximately $5.8$22.1 million at closing, of which $600 thousand$1.5 million was placed in escrow pursuant to the terms of an escrow agreement which will be used to secure indemnity obligations for a period of 1824 months. Additionally, the Company assumed net liabilities approximating $5.0 million.million, inclusive of a potential earn-out payable in 2018 based on 2017 net revenue of BoardEx’s existing products and services. The results of operations of The DealMDL are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013,2015 and for the year ended December 31, 20122014 from September 11, 2012,October 31, 2014, the date of the acquisition.

In December of 2015, the Company made an entity classification election under IRC Section 301.7701-1 to treat MDL as a disregarded entity for US income tax purposes.  Since an election under IRC Section 338(g) was made on the acquisition of MDL to treat it as an asset purchase for U.S. income tax purposes, the goodwill is amortizable under IRC Section 197 over 15 years on the Company’s U.S. income tax return.

 

The following table summarizes the consideration paid and the amounts of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed recognized at the acquisition date.

 

 Amortization Life    Amortization Life   
 (in years)  Amount (in years) Amount 
Accounts receivable, net  $765,357     $997,161 
Other receivables   315,322      750,434 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets   168,492      91,598 
Property and equipment, net   729,400      153,060 
Other assets      109,000 
Identifiable intangible assets:           
- Subscriber relationships 10  2,960,000
- Client data base 10  3,170,000
- Software 5  685,000
- Customer relationships  10   3,670,000 
- Database  10   5,130,000 
- Trade name 10  480,000  6   310,000 
- Advertiser relationships 6  70,000
Restricted cash   301,000
Accounts payable   (391,992)      (50,135)
Accrued expenses   (1,368,270)      (956,156)
Deferred revenue   (3,761,210)      (4,367,717)
Other current liabilities   (361,659)      (40,516)
Other liabilities      (2,687,838)
Total identifiable net assets   3,761,440      3,108,891 
Goodwill   1,668,623      16,813,181 
Total consideration  $ 5,430,063
Cash consideration, net of cash acquired     $19,922,072 

 

Acquisition related costs totaling $0.4$1.5 million are included in general and administrative expenses in the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2012.2014.

The DealFlow Report, The Life Settlements Report and the PrivateRaise database

On April 19, 2013, the Company acquiredThe DealFlow Report, The Life Settlements Reportand the PrivateRaise database (the “DealFlow” acquisition) from DealFlow Media, Inc. These newsletters and database, and the employees providing their content, have been incorporated into The Deal, TheStreet’s institutional platform. The Company paid cash consideration of approximately $2.0 million and issued 408,829 unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock, having a value on the closing date of approximately $781 thousand. Additionally, the Company assumed net liabilities of approximately $726 thousand. The acquisition was not significant and pro forma financial information was not required. The results of operations of DealFlow are included in the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, and for the year ended December 31, 2013 from April 19, 2013, the date of the acquisition.


Proforma Information

 

Unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information is presented below as if the acquisition of The DealMDL had occurred on January 1, 2011.2013. The historical financial statements of MDL were prepared in accordance with United Kingdom generally accepted accounting principles and have been converted to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for purposes of the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information presented below. The results have been adjusted to account for the amortization of acquired intangible assets, and to eliminate interest expense relatedreclassify a defined benefit plan actuarial gain recorded by MDL within the statement of operations to short term notes payable to related parties of The Deal, which liabilities were not assumed by the Company,accumulated other comprehensive income in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and deal acquisition costs. The pro forma information presented below does not purport to present what actual results would have been if the acquisitionsacquisition had occurred at the beginning of such periods,January 1, 2013, nor does the information project results for any future period. The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information should be read in conjunction with the historical financial information of the Company included in this report, as well as the historical financial information included in other reports and documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information for the years ended December 31, 20122014 and 20112013 is as follows:

 

  2012  2011 
Total revenue $58,191,117  $69,254,368 
Net loss $16,140,048  $13,543,809 
Basic and diluted net loss per share $0.50  $0.42 
F-19

The DealFlow Report, The Life Settlements Report and the PrivateRaise database

  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2014  2013 
Total Revenue $69,554,714  $63,979,231 
Net Loss $(1,505,531) $(2,814,915)
Basic and diluted net loss per share $(0.04) $(0.08)

 

On April 19, 2013, the Company acquiredThe DealFlow Report, The Life Settlements Reportand the PrivateRaise database (the “DealFlow” acquisition) from DealFlow Media, Inc. These newsletters and database, and the employees providing their content, have been incorporated into The Deal, TheStreet’s institutional platform. The Company paid cash consideration of approximately $2.0 million, of which $195 thousand was held back to be used to secure indemnity obligations for a period of one year, and issued 408,829 unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock, having a value on the closing date of approximately $781 thousand. Additionally, the Company assumed net liabilities of approximately $726 thousand. The acquisition was not significant and pro forma financial information was not required. The results of operations of DealFlow were included in the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013, from April 19, 2013, the date of the acquisition.

(4)(3) Net Loss Per Share

 

Basic net loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares and potential common shares outstanding during the period, so long as the inclusion of potential common shares does not result in a lower net loss per share. Potential common shares consist of restricted stock units (using the treasury stock method), the incremental common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options (using the treasury stock method), and the conversion of the Company’s convertible preferred stock and warrants (using the if-converted method). Such warrants to purchase Common Stock all expired during the fourth quarter of 2012. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, 2012 and 2011, approximately 4.23.1 million, 3.35.2 million and 4.54.2 million unvested restricted stock units, vested and unvested options and warrants to purchase Common Stock, respectively, were excluded from the calculation, as their effect would result in a lower net loss per share.


The following table reconciles the numerator and denominator for the calculation.

 

  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2013  2012  2011 
Basic and diluted net loss per share            
Numerator:            
Loss from continuing operations $3,785,701  $12,714,951  $8,182,323 
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations        1,798 
Preferred stock cash dividends     192,848   385,696 
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share – Net loss attributable to common stockholders $3,785,701  $12,907,799  $8,569,817 
             
Denominator:            
Weighted average basic and diluted shares outstanding  33,725,317   32,710,018   31,953,683 
             
Basic and diluted net loss per share:            
Loss from continuing operations $0.11  $0.38  $0.26 
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations        0.00 
Preferred stock cash dividends     0.01   0.01 
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $0.11  $0.39  $0.27 
F-20
  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2015  2014  2013 
Basic and diluted net loss per share Numerator:            
Net loss $1,543,003  $3,789,877  $3,785,701 
Preferred stock cash dividends  385,696   385,696   - 
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share – Net loss attributable to common stockholders $1,928,699  $4,175,573  $3,785,701 
             
Denominator:            
Weighted average basic and diluted shares outstanding  34,839,233   34,370,843   33,725,317 
             
Basic and diluted net loss per share:            
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(0.06) $(0.12) $(0.11)

(5)

(4) Cash and Cash Equivalents, Marketable Securities and Restricted Cash

 

The Company’s cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash primarily consist of money market funds and checking accounts. MarketableAs of December 31, 2015, marketable securities consist of liquid short-term U.S. Treasuries, government agencies, certificates of deposit (insured up to FDIC limits), investment grade corporate and municipal bonds, corporate floating rate notes, and two municipal auction rate securities (“ARS”) issued by the District of Columbia with a parcost basis of approximately $1.9 million and a fair value of approximately $1.9$1.6 million. As of December 31, 2013,2014, marketable securities also included an investment grade corporate bond, and the totalaggregate fair value of these marketable securities was approximately $13.1$3.6 million and the total cost basis was approximately $13.3$3.9 million. As of December 31, 2012, the total fair value of theseThe decrease in marketable securities was approximately $35.4 million anddue to the total cost basis was approximately $35.5 million.Company not reinvesting the proceeds as securities matured. With the exception of the ARS, the maximum maturity for any investment is three years. The ARS mature in the year 2038. The Company accounts for its marketable securities in accordance with the provisions of ASC 320-10. The Company classifies these securities as available for sale and the securities are reported at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive incomeloss and excluded from net loss.loss as they are deemed temporary. Additionally, as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company has a total of approximately $661 thousand and $1.3 million, respectively, of cash that serves as collateral for outstanding letters of credit, and which cash is therefore restricted. The letters of credit serve as security deposits for the Company’s office space in New York City.

 

 As of December 31,  As of December 31, 
 2013 2012  2015  2014 
Cash and cash equivalents $45,443,759  $23,845,360  $28,445,416  $32,459,009 
Current and noncurrent marketable securities  13,097,735   35,394,318   1,590,000   3,569,240 
Current and noncurrent restricted cash  1,301,000   1,301,000   661,250   1,301,000 
Total cash and cash equivalents, current and noncurrent marketable securities and current and noncurrent restricted cash $59,842,494  $60,540,678  $30,696,666  $37,329,249 

(6)(5) Fair Value Measurements

 

The Company measures the fair value of its financial instruments in accordance with ASC 820-10, which refines the definition of fair value, provides a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the reporting date. The statement establishes consistency and comparability by providing a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques into three broad levels, which are described below:

 

·Level 1: Inputs are quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (these are observable market inputs).
·Level 2: Inputs are inputs other than quoted market prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability (includes quoted market prices for similar assets or identical or similar assets in markets in which there are few transactions, prices that are not current or vary substantially).
·Level 3: Inputs are unobservable inputs that reflect the entity’s own assumptions in pricing the asset or liability (used when little or no market data is available).
Level 1: Inputs are quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (these are observable market inputs).

Level 2: Inputs other than quoted market prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability (includes quoted market prices for similar assets or identical or similar assets in markets in which there are few transactions, prices that are not current or vary substantially).

Level 3: Inputs are unobservable inputs that reflect the entity’s own assumptions in pricing the asset or liability (used when little or no market data is available).

 

Financial assets and liabilities included in our financial statements and measured at fair value are classified based on the valuation technique level in the table below:

F-21
  As of December 31, 2013 
   Total   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3 
Description:                
Cash and cash equivalents (1) $45,443,759  $45,443,759  $  $ 
Restricted cash (1)  1,301,000   1,301,000       
Marketable securities (2)  13,097,735   11,517,735      1,580,000 
Total at fair value $59,842,494  $58,262,494  $  $1,580,000 

 

 As of December 31, 2012  As of December 31, 2015 
  Total   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3  Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 
Description:                                
Cash and cash equivalents (1) $23,845,360  $23,845,360  $  $  $28,445,416  $28,445,416  $  $ 
Restricted cash (1)  1,301,000   1,301,000         661,250   661,250       
Marketable securities (2)  35,394,318   33,854,318      1,540,000   1,590,000         1,590,000 
Contingent earn-out (3)  2,590,339         2,590,339 
Total at fair value $60,540,678  $59,000,678  $  $1,540,000  $33,287,005  $29,106,666  $  $4,180,339 

  As of December 31, 2014 
 Total  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
Description:                
Cash and cash equivalents (1) $32,459,009  $32,459,009  $  $ 
Restricted cash (1)  1,301,000   1,301,000       
Marketable securities (2)  3,569,240   2,009,240      1,560,000 
Contingent earn-out (3)  2,602,105         2,602,105 
Total at fair value $39,931,354  $35,769,249  $  $4,162,105 

 

(1)         Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, totaling approximately $46.7$29.1 million and $25.1$33.8 million as of December 31, 20132015 and 2012,2014, respectively, consistsconsist primarily of money market funds and checking accounts for which we determine fair value through quoted market prices.


(2)         Marketable securities consist of liquid short-term U.S. Treasuries, government agencies, certificates of deposit (insured up to FDIC limits), investment grade corporate and municipal bonds and corporate floating rate notes for which we determine fair value through quoted market prices. Marketable securities also consist ofinclude two municipal ARS issued by the District of Columbia having a fair value totaling approximately $1.6 million and $1.5$1.6 million as of December 31, 20132015 and 2012,2014, respectively. Historically, the fair value of ARS investments approximated par value due to the frequent resets through the auction process. Due to events in credit markets, the auction events, which historically have provided liquidity for these securities, have been unsuccessful. The result of a failed auction is that these ARS holdings will continue to pay interest in accordance with their terms at each respective auction date; however, liquidity of the securities will be limited until there is a successful auction, the issuer redeems the securities, the securities mature or until such time as other markets for these ARS holdings develop. For each of our ARS, we evaluate the risks related to the structure, collateral and liquidity of the investment, and forecast the probability of issuer default, auction failure and a successful auction at par, or a redemption at par, for each future auction period. Temporary impairment charges are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income,loss, whereas other-than-temporary impairment charges are recorded in our consolidated statement of operations. As of December 31, 2013,2015, the Company determined there was a decline in the fair value of its ARS investments of $270$260 thousand from its cost basis, which was deemed temporary and was included within accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income.loss. The Company used a discounted cash flow and market approach model to determine the estimated fair value of its investment in ARS. The assumptions used in preparing the discounted cash flow model include estimates for interest rate, timing and amount of cash flows and expected holding period of ARS. At December 31, 2014, marketable securities also consisted of an investment grade corporate bond for which we determined fair value through quoted market prices.

(3)         Contingent earn-out represents additional purchase consideration payable to the former shareholders of Management Diagnostics Limited based upon the achievement of specific 2017 audited revenue benchmarks. The probability of achieving each benchmark is based on Management’s assessment of the projected 2017 revenue. The present value of each probability weighted payment was calculated by discounting the probability weighted payment by the corresponding present value factor.

 

The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance for the Company’s marketable securitiesassets and liabilities measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):

F-22
Marketable
Securities
Balance December 31, 2011 $1,410,000 
Increase in fair value of investment  130,000 
Balance December 31, 2012  1,540,000 
Increase in fair value of investment  40,000 
Balance December 31, 2013 $1,580,000 

  Marketable
Securities
 
Balance December 31, 2013 $1,580,000 
Change in fair value of investment  (20,000)
Balance December 31, 2014  1,560,000 
Change in fair value of investment  30,000 
Balance December 31, 2015 $1,590,000 

  Contingent
Earn-Out
 
Balance December 31, 2013 $- 
Addition  2,602,105 
Balance December 31, 2014  2,602,105 
Purchase accounting adjustment  (144,398)
Accretion of net present value  132,632 
Balance December 31, 2015 $2,590,339 

 

(7)(6) Property and Equipment

 

Property and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Property and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful life of computer equipment, computer software and telephone equipment is three years;years and of furniture and fixtures is five years; and of capitalized software and Website development costs is variable based upon the applicable project. During the year ended December 31, 2013, completed capitalized software and Website development projects were deemed to have a three year useful life.years. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the respective lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset. If the useful lives of the assets differ materially from the estimates contained herein, additional costs could be incurred, which could have an adverse impact on our expenses.

F-23 

Property and equipment as of December 31, 20132015 and 20122014 consists of the following:

 

  As of December 31, 
  2013  2012 
Computer equipment $14,307,205  $14,210,373 
Furniture and fixtures  2,726,959   2,740,089 
Leasehold improvements  3,401,591   3,354,575 
   20,435,755   20,305,037 
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization  16,035,351   14,633,037 
Property and equipment, net $4,400,404  $5,672,000 

Included in computer equipment are capitalized software and Website development costs of approximately $7.8 million and $7.7 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. A summary of the activity of capitalized software and Website development costs is as follows:

Balance December 31, 2012 $7,691,591 
Additions  732,147 
Deletions  (582,231)
Balance December 31, 2013 $7,841,507 
  As of December 31, 
  2015  2014 
Computer equipment and software $1,823,428  $1,456,483 
Furniture and fixtures and telephone equipment  2,041,229   2,072,289 
Leasehold improvements  3,713,491   3,401,591 
   7,578,148   6,930,363 
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization  4,804,411   4,003,538 
Property and equipment, net $2,773,737  $2,926,825 

 

Depreciation and amortization expense for the above noted property and equipment aggregatedwas approximately $2.1$1.3 million, $4.1 million$912 thousand and $4.4$1.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122015, 2014 and 2011,2013, respectively. The Company does not include depreciation and amortization expense in cost of services.services, sales and marketing or general and administrative expense.

F-23

(8)

(7) Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 were as follows:

Balance as of December 31, 2013 $27,997,286 
Acquisition of Management Diagnostics Limited  16,813,181 
Balance as of December 31, 2014  44,810,467 
Purchase accounting adjustments  (237,772)
Exchange rate impact  (1,254,025)
Balance as of December 31, 2015 $43,318,670 

 

The Company’s goodwill and other intangible assets and related accumulated amortization as of December 31, 20132015 and 20122014 consist of the following:

 

  As of December 31, 
  2013  2012 
Total goodwill $27,997,286  $25,726,239 
Other intangible assets not subject to amortization:        
Trade name $720,000  $720,000 
Total other intangible assets not subject to amortization  720,000   720,000 
Other intangible assets subject to amortization:        
Customer relationships  10,792,136   9,892,136 
Software models  1,988,194   1,988,194 
Noncompete agreement  130,000   1,339,535 
Product databases  3,367,000   3,307,000 
Trade names  500,000   480,000 
Domain names  160,425   162,975 
Total other intangible assets subject to amortization  16,937,755   17,169,840 
Less accumulated amortization  (6,994,772)  (6,699,283)
Net other intangible assets subject to amortization  9,942,983   10,470,557 
Total other intangible assets $10,662,983  $11,190,557 

  As of December 31, 
  2015  2014 
Total goodwill $43,318,670  $44,810,467 
Other intangible assets not subject to amortization:        
Trade name $720,000  $720,000 
Total other intangible assets not subject to amortization  720,000   720,000 
Other intangible assets subject to amortization:        
Customer relationships  14,188,406   14,462,136 
Software models  1,988,194   1,988,194 
Noncompete agreement  130,000   130,000 
Product databases  8,863,608   8,619,588 
Trade names  786,878   810,000 
Capitalized website and software development  7,511,193   6,153,648 
Domain names  160,425   160,425 
Total other intangible assets subject to amortization  33,628,704   32,323,991 
Less accumulated amortization  (15,674,328)  (12,896,782)
Net other intangible assets subject to amortization  17,954,376   19,427,209 
Total other intangible assets $18,674,376  $20,147,209 

Intangible assets were established through business acquisitions.acquisitions and internally developed capitalized website and software development costs. Definite-lived intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over a weighted-average period of approximately 9.89.9 years for customer relationships, 4.7 years for software models, 3.0 years for noncompete agreements, 9.79.9 years for product darabasesdatabases and 9.78.3 years for trade names.

 

Amortization expense totaled approximately $1.6$3.1 million, $1.3$2.3 million and $1.4$2.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122015, 2014 and 2011,2013, respectively. The estimated amortization expense for the next five years is as follows:

 

For the Years
Ended
December 31,
   Amount 
2014  $1,684,358 
2015   1,671,932 
2016   1,633,621 
2017   1,464,531 
2018   785,301 
Thereafter   2,703,240 
Total  $9,942,983 
F-24
For the Years
Ended
    
December 31,  Amount 
 2016  $3,743,107 
 2017   3,501,122 
 2018   2,698,284 
 2019   1,710,601 
 2020   1,701,990 
 Thereafter   4,599,272 
 Total  $17,954,376 

(9)

(8) Accrued Expenses

 

Accrued expenses as of December 31, 20132015 and 20122014 consist of the following:

 

  As of December 31, 
  2013  2012 
Payroll and related costs $1,672,891  $1,861,066 
Business development  697,049   306,764 
Professional fees  470,423   463,603 
Advertising  401,301   121,182 
Tax related  206,508   164,964 
Restructuring and other charges (see note 14)  96,273   1,838,904 
Other liabilities  793,978   1,164,669 
Total accrued expenses $4,338,423  $5,921,152 

  As of December 31, 
  2015  2014 
Payroll and related costs $1,941,665  $2,544,215 
Tax related  728,336   666,102 
Professional fees  591,827   890,567 
Business development  391,854   467,876 
Advertising  208,507   334,295 
Other liabilities  1,299,792   1,376,027 
Total accrued expenses $5,161,981  $6,279,082 

 

(10)(9) Income Taxes

 

The Company accounts for its income taxes in accordance with ASC 740-10. Under ASC 740-10, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their tax bases. ASC 740-10 also requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized based on all available positive and negative evidence.

 

The Company had approximately $156$154 million and $150$149 million of federal and state net operating loss carryforwards as of December 31, 20132015 and 2012,2014, respectively. The Company has a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets as management concluded that it was more likely than not that the Company would not realize the benefit of its deferred tax assets by generating sufficient taxable income in future years. The Company expects to continue to provide a full valuation allowance until, or unless, it can sustain a level of profitability that demonstrates its ability to utilize these assets.


Subject to potential Section 382 limitations as discussed below, the federal losses are available to offset future taxable income through 20332035 and expire from 2019 through 2033.2035. Since the Company does business in various states and each state has its own rules with respect to the number of years losses may be carried forward, the state net operating loss carryforwards expire from 20142016 through 2033.2035. The net operating loss carryforwards as of December 31, 20132015 and 20122014 include approximately $15$16 million and $16 million, respectively, related to windfall tax benefits for which a benefit would be recorded to additional paid in capital when realized.

 

In accordance with Section 382 of the Internal Revenue code, the ability to utilize the Company’s net operating loss carryforwards could be limited in the event of a change in ownership and as such a portion of the existing net operating loss carryforwards may be subject to limitation.

 

The Company is subject to federal, state and local corporate income taxes. The components of the provision for income taxes reflected on the consolidated statements of operations from continuing operations are set forth below:

F-25
  For the Years Ended December 31, 
   2013   2012   2011 
Current taxes:            
U.S. federal $  $  $ 
State and local         
Total current tax benefit $  $  $ 
             
Deferred taxes:            
U.S. federal $  $  $ 
State and local         
Total deferred tax expense $  $  $ 
             
Total tax expense $  $  $ 

  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2015  2014  2013 
  (in thousands) 
Current taxes:            
U.S. federal $-  $8  $- 
State and local  -   8   - 
Foreign  4   18   - 
Total current tax expense $4  $34  $- 
Deferred taxes:            
U.S. federal $809  $382  $- 
State and local  368   59   - 
Foreign  -   -   - 
Total deferred tax expense $1,177  $441  $- 
Total tax expense $1,181  $475  $- 

 

A reconciliation of the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate to the Company’sCompany's effective income tax rate is set forth below:

 

  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2013  2012  2011 
U.S. statutory federal income tax rate  34.0%  34.0%  34.0%
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit  6.3   6.3   6.0 
Effect of permanent differences  (2.9)  (0.8)  (1.6)
Change to valuation allowance  (37.4)  (39.7)  (38.4)
Other  0.0   0.2   0.0 
Effective income tax rate  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%

  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2015  2014  2013 
U.S. statutory federal income tax rate  34.0%  34.0%  34.0%
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit  (67.2)  1.1   6.3 
Effect of permanent differences  (35.7)  (9.7)  (2.9)
R&D credit  26.7   0.0   0.0 
Change to valuation allowance  (281.5)  (37.4)  (37.4)
Foreign rate tax differential  (2.9)  (2.3)  - 
Effective income tax rate  (326.6)%  (14.3)%  0.0%

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when such differences are expected to reverse. Significant components of the Company’sCompany's net deferred tax assets and liabilities are set forth below:

F-26
  As of December 31, 
  2013  2012 
  (in thousands) 
Deferred tax assets:        
Operating loss carryforward $62,992  $60,801 
Windfall tax benefit carryforward  (5,243)  (5,498)
Capital loss carryforward  30    
Goodwill  285   833 
Intangible assets  1,195   1,215 
Accrued expenses  1,677   2,456 
Depreciation  693   509 
Other  2,050   2,178 
Total deferred tax assets  63,679   62,494 
Deferred tax liabilities:        
Trademarks/goodwill  (288)  (288)
Total deferred tax liabilities  (288)  (288)
Less: valuation allowance  (63,679)  (62,494)
Net deferred tax liability $(288) $(288)

  As of December 31, 
  2015  2014 
  (in thousands) 
Deferred tax assets:        
Operating loss carryforward $70,426  $63,553 
Windfall tax benefit carryforward  (5,332)  (5,332)
Capital loss carryforward  229   28 
Intangible assets  (329)  628 
Accrued expenses  1,158   1,753 
Depreciation  884   953 
Other  1,820   1,894 
Total deferred tax assets  68,856   63,477 
Deferred tax liabilities:        
Goodwill  (1,612)  (455)
Trademarks  (294)  (274)
Total deferred tax liabilities  (1,906)  (729)
Less: valuation allowance  (68,856)  (63,477)
Net deferred tax liability $(1,906) $(729)

 

The Company has no uncertain tax positions pursuant to ASC 740-10 for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122015, 2014 and 2011.2013.

 

(11)(10) Stockholders’ Equity

 

Convertible Preferred Stock

 

Securities Purchase Agreement

 

On November 15, 2007, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with TCV VI, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, and TCV Member Fund, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (collectively, the “Purchasers”).

 

Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company sold the Purchasers an aggregate of 5,500 shares of its newly-created Series B convertible preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Series B Preferred Stock”), that are immediately convertible into an aggregate of 3,856,942 shares of its Common Stock at a conversion price of $14.26 per share, and warrants (the “Warrants”) to purchase an aggregate of 1,157,083 shares of Common Stock for $15.69 per share. The consideration paid for the Series B Preferred Stock and the Warrants was $55 million. As of December 31, 2013,2015, no Series B Preferred Stock has been converted and the warrants have expired without any shares having been purchased. The Series B Preferred Stock has not been registered and the Company has not registered the shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock.


Investor Rights Agreement

 

On November 15, 2007, the Company also entered into an Investor Rights Agreement with the Purchasers (the “Investor Rights Agreement”) pursuant to which, among other things, the Company

F-27

agreed to grant the Purchasers certain registration rights including the right to require the Company to file a registration statement within 30 days to register the Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock and upon exercise of the Warrants and to use its reasonable best efforts to cause the registration to be declared effective within 90 days after the date the registration is filed. To date, no such request has been made.

 

Certificate of Designation

 

Pursuant to a Certificate of Designation for the Series B Preferred Stock (the “Certificate of Designation”) filed by the Company with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on November 15, 2007: (i) the Series B Preferred Stock has a purchase price per share equal to $10,000 (the “Original Issue Price”); (ii) in the event of any Liquidation Event (as defined in the Certificate of Designation), the holders of shares of Series B Preferred Stock are entitled to receive, prior to any distribution to the holders of the Common Stock, an amount per share equal to the Original Issue Price, plus any declared and unpaid dividends; (iii) the holders of the Series B Preferred Stock have the right to vote on any matter submitted to a vote of the stockholders of the Company and are entitled to vote that number of votes equal to the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of such holders’ shares of Series B Preferred Stock; (iv) for so long as 40% of the shares of Series B Preferred Stock remain outstanding, the holders of a majority of such shares will have the right to elect one person to the Company’s board of directors; (v) the Series B Preferred Stock automatically converts into an aggregate of 3,856,942 shares of Common Stock in the event that the Common Stock trades on a trading market at or above a closing price equal to $28.52 per share for 90 consecutive trading days and any demand registration previously requested by the holders of the Series B Preferred Stock has become effective; and (vi) so long as 30% of the shares of the currently-outstanding Series B Preferred Stock remain outstanding, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of such shares will be necessary to take any of the following actions: (a) authorize, create or issue any class or classes of our capital stock ranking senior to, or on a parity with (as to dividends or upon a liquidation event) the Series B Preferred Stock or any securities exercisable or exchangeable for, or convertible into, any now or hereafter authorized capital stock ranking senior to, or on a parity with (as to dividends or upon a liquidation event) the Series B Preferred Stock (including, without limitation, the issuance of any shares of Series B Preferred Stock (other than shares of Series B Preferred Stock issued as a stock dividend or in a stock split)); (b) any increase or decrease in the authorized number of shares of Series B Preferred Stock; (c) any amendment, waiver, alteration or repeal of our certificate of incorporation or bylaws in a way that adversely affects the rights, preferences or privileges of the Series B Preferred Stock; (d) the payment of any dividends (other than dividends paid in the capital stock of the Company or any of its subsidiaries) in excess of $0.10 per share per annum on the Common Stock unless after the payment of such dividends we have unrestricted cash (net of all indebtedness for borrowed money, purchase money obligations, promissory notes or bonds) in an amount equal to at least two times the product obtained by multiplying the number of shares of Series B Preferred Stock outstanding at the time such dividend is paid by the liquidation preference; and (e) the purchase or redemption of: (1) any Common Stock (except for the purchase or redemption from employees, directors and consultants pursuant to agreements providing us with repurchase rights upon termination of their service with us) unless after such purchase or redemption we have unrestricted cash (net of all indebtedness for borrowed money, purchase money obligations, promissory notes or bonds) equal to at least two times the product obtained by multiplying the number of shares of Series B Preferred Stock outstanding at the time such dividend is paid by the liquidation preference; or (2) any class or series of now or hereafter of our authorized stock that ranks junior to (upon a liquidation event) the Series B Preferred Stock.

F-28

F-28 

Treasury Stock

 

In December 2000, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $10 million of the Company’s Common Stock, from time to time, in private purchases or in the open market. In February 2004, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the resumption of the stock repurchase program (the “Program”) under new price and volume parameters, leaving unchanged the maximum amount available for repurchase under the Program. However, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Series B Preferred Stock, voting separately as a single class, is necessary for the Company to repurchase its Common Stock (except as described above). During the years ended December 31, 20132015 and 2012,2014, the Company did not purchase any shares of Common Stock under the Program. Since inception of the Program, the Company has purchased a total of 5,453,416 shares of Common Stock at an aggregate cost of approximately $7.3 million.

 

In addition, pursuant to the terms of the Company’s 2007 Plan, and certain procedures adopted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, in connection with the exercise of stock options by certain of the Company’s employees, and the issuance of shares of Common Stock in settlement of vested restricted stock units, the Company may withhold shares in lieu of payment of the exercise price and/or the minimum amount of applicable withholding taxes then due. Through December 31, 2013,2015, the Company had withheld an aggregate of 1,348,8831,670,623 shares which have been recorded as treasury stock. In addition, the Company received an aggregate of 208,270 shares as partial settlement of the working capital and debt adjustment from the acquisition of Corsis Technology Group II LLC and 3,338 shares as partial settlement of the working capital adjustment from the acquisition of Kikucall, Inc. These shares have also been recorded as treasury stock.

 

Dividends

 

There were no dividends paid duringDuring the yearyears ended December 31, 2013. The Company has reinstated the payment of a $0.025 quarterly per share dividend beginning with the first quarter of 2014. In the third quarter of 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors suspended the payment of a quarterly dividend. During both the first2015 and second quarters of 2012, and for each of the four quarters in the year ended December 31, 2011,2014, the Company paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.025 per share on its Common Stock and its Series B Preferred Stock on a converted common share basis. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, theseThese dividend payments totaled approximately $1.8$3.9 million and $3.8$3.9 million, respectively. There were no dividends paid during the year ended December 31, 2013.

 

Stock Options

 

Under the terms of the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (the “1998 Plan”), 8,900,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company were reserved for awards of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, restricted stock, deferred stock, restricted stock units, or any combination thereof. Under the terms of the 2007 Plan, 7,750,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company were reserved for awards of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units or other stock-based awards. The 2007 Plan also authorized cash performance awards. Additionally, under the terms of the 2007 Plan, unused shares authorized for award under the 1998 Plan are available for issuance under the 2007 Plan. No further awards will be made under the 1998 Plan. Awards may be granted to such directors, employees and consultants of the Company as the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors shall select in its discretion or delegate to management to select. Only employees of the Company are eligible to receive grants of incentive stock options. Awards generally vest over a three- to five-year period and stock options generally have terms of five years. As of December 31, 2013,2015, there remained approximately 2.21.8 million shares available for future awards under the 2007 Plan. Stock-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122015, 2014 and 20112013 was approximately

F-29

$2.1 $1.6 million, $1.8 million and $2.1 million (inclusive of $393 thousand included in restructuring and other charges), $2.4 million (inclusive of $222 thousand included in restructuring and other charges) and $3.4 million, respectively.


A stock option represents the right, once the option has vested and become exercisable, to purchase a share of the Company’s Common Stock at a particular exercise price set at the time of the grant. A restricted stock unit (“RSU”) represents the right to receive one share of the Company’s Common Stock (or, if provided in the award, the fair market value of a share in cash) on the applicable vesting date for such RSU. Until the stock certificate for a share of Common Stock represented by an RSU is delivered, the holder of an RSU does not have any of the rights of a stockholder with respect to the Common Stock. However, the grant of an RSU includes the grant of dividend equivalents with respect to such RSU. The Company records cash dividends for RSUs to be paid in the future at an amount equal to the rate paid on a share of Common Stock for each then-outstanding RSU granted. The accumulated dividend equivalents related to outstanding grants vest on the applicable vesting date for the RSU with respect to which such dividend equivalents were credited, and are paid in cash at the time a stock certificate evidencing the shares represented by such vested RSU is delivered.

 

A summary of the activity of the 1998 and 2007 Plans and awards issued outside of the Plan pertaining to stock option grants is as follows:

 

 Shares
Underlying
Awards
 Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
($000)
 Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
(In Years)
  Shares
Underlying
Awards
 Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
($000)
 Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
(In Years)
 
Awards outstanding, December 31, 2012  3,251,849  $2.22       
Awards outstanding, December 31, 2014  4,246,041  $1.90         
Options granted  1,645,534  $2.02         40,576  $2.23         
Options exercised  (42,578) $1.75         (603) $1.39         
Options cancelled  (117,029) $2.43         (367,657) $1.90         
Options expired  (302,240) $6.01         (526,750) $2.12         
Awards outstanding, December 31, 2013  4,435,536  $1.89 $1,806  4.70 
Awards vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2013  4,011,951  $1.88 $1,654  4.68 
Awards exercisable at December 31, 2013  1,202,084  $1.90 $557  4.36 
Awards outstanding, December 31, 2015  3,391,607  $1.87  $35   2.73 
Awards vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2015  3,345,054  $1.87  $35   2.73 
Awards exercisable at December 31, 2015  2,724,166  $1.84  $29   2.71 


A summary of the activity of the 1998 and 2007 Plans pertaining to grants of restricted stock units is as follows:

F-30

   Shares
Underlying
Awards
  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
($000)
 

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (In
Years)

 
Awards outstanding, December 31, 2012  913,027  $       
Restricted stock units granted  1,338,018  $       
Restricted stock units settled by delivery of Common Stock upon vesting  (751,371) $       
Restricted stock units cancelled  (21,227) $       
Awards outstanding, December 31, 2013  1,478,447  $ $3,341  3.74 
Awards vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2013  1,406,822  $ $3,179  3.06 

  Shares
Underlying
Awards
  Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
($000)
  Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (In
Years)
 
Awards outstanding, December 31, 2014  1,205,343         
Restricted stock units granted  104,289         
Restricted stock units settled by delivery of Common Stock upon vesting  (490,807)        
Restricted stock units cancelled  (12,501)        
Awards outstanding, December 31, 2015  806,324  $1,209   1.98 
Awards vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2015  793,199  $1,190   1.73 

 

A summary of the status of the Company’s unvested share-based payment awards as of December 31, 20132015 and changes in the year then ended is as follows:

 

Unvested Awards  Awards   Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair
Value
  Awards  Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 
Shares underlying awards unvested at December 31, 2012  3,834,606  $1.05 
Shares underlying awards unvested at December 31, 2014  3,181,037  $1.16 
Shares underlying options granted  1,645,534  $0.63   40,576  $0.39 
Shares underlying restricted stock units granted  1,338,018  $2.06   104,289  $2.19 
Shares underlying options vested  (1,216,632) $0.51   (981,172) $0.52 
Shares underlying restricted stock units issued  (751,371) $2.90   (490,807) $2.18 
Shares underlying unvested options cancelled  (117,029) $0.79   (367,657) $0.58 
Shares underlying unvested restricted stock units cancelled  (21,227) $3.25   (12,501) $1.70 
Shares underlying awards unvested at December 31, 2013  4,711,899  $1.03 
Shares underlying awards unvested at December 31, 2015  1,473,765  $1.44 

 

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, 2012approximately 41 thousand, 276 thousand, and 2011, approximately 1.6 million 2.8 million and 730 thousand stock options, respectively, were granted to employees of the Company, and 603, 186 thousand and 43 thousand options were exercised during the yearyears ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, yielding $838, $303 thousand and $74 thousand, respectively, of cash proceeds to the Company. There were no stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2012 or 2011. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, 2012 and 2011, approximately 1.3 million, 249104 thousand, 471 thousand and 1.41.3 million restricted stock units, respectively, were granted to employees of the Company, and 491 thousand, 723 thousand and 751 thousand, 1.3 million and 681 thousand shares, respectively, were issued under restricted stock unit grants. The weighted-average grant date fair value per share of employee stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $0.63, $0.48 and $0.89, respectively, and the weighted-average grant date fair value per share of employee restricted stock units granted was $2.06, $1.77 and $2.82, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122015, 2014 and 2011,2013, the total fair value of share-based awards vested was approximately $2.1$1.3 million, $2.7$2.4 million and $1.9$2.1 million, respectively. For the yearyears ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the total intrinsic value of options exercised was approximately $373, $154 thousand and $16 thousand. There were no options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2012 or 2011.thousand, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122015, 2014 and 2011,2013, the total intrinsic value of restricted stock units that vested was approximately $1.4 million, $2.5$840 thousand, $1.7 million and $1.6$1.4 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2013,2015, there was approximately $4.1$1.8 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense remaining to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.41.9 years.

 

F-31

F-31 

(12)

(11) Commitments and Contingencies

 

Operating Leases and Employment Agreements

 

The Company is committed under operating leases, principally for office space, which expire at various dates through August 31, 2021.January 2026. Certain leases contain escalation clauses relating to increases in property taxes and maintenance costs. Rent and equipment rental expenses wereexpense was approximately $1.5$2.1 million, $1.5$1.8 million and $1.7$1.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122015, 2014 and 2011,2013, respectively. Additionally, the Company has agreements with certain of its employees and outside contributors, whose future minimum payments are dependent on the future fulfillment of their services thereunder. As of December 31, 2013,2015, total future minimum cash payments are as follows:

 

  Payments Due by Year 
Contractual obligations: Total  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  After 2018 
Operating leases $16,708,304  $1,872,688  $1,819,238  $1,967,230  $2,557,338  $2,622,557  $5,869,253 
Employment agreement  10,000,000   2,500,000   2,500,000   2,500,000   2,500,000       
Outside contributors  391,667   350,000   41,667             
Total contractual cash obligations $27,099,971  $4,722,688  $4,360,905  $4,467,230  $5,057,338  $2,622,557  $5,869,253 

  Payments Due by Year 
Contractual obligations: Total  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  After 2020 
Operating leases 12,073,785  $2,566,802  $2,419,444  $ 2,117,147  1,996,904  1,987,382  $986,106 
Employment agreement  5,000,000   2,500,000   2,500,000             
Outside contributors  137,500   137,500                
Total contractual cash obligations $17,211,285  $5,204,302  $4,919,444  $2,117,147  $1,996,904  $1,987,382  $986,106 

 

Future minimum cash payments for the year ending December 31, 20142016 related to operating leases has been reduced by approximately $733$488 thousand related to payments to be received related to the sublease of office space.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

The Company is party to other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business or otherwise, none of which is deemed material.

 

(13)(12) Long Term Investment

 

During 2008, the Company made an investment in Debtfolio, Inc., doing business as Geezeo, an online financial management solutions provider for banks and credit unions. The investment totaled approximately $1.9 million for an 18.5% ownership stake. Additionally, the Company incurred approximately $0.2 million of legal fees in connection with this investment. The Company retained the option to purchase the company based on an equity value of $12 million at any point prior to April 23, 2009, but did not exercise the option. During the first quarter of 2009, the carrying value of the Company’s investment was written down to fair value based upon an estimate of the market value of the Company’s equity in light of Debtfolio’s efforts to raise capital at the time from third parties. The impairment charge approximated $1.5 million. The Company performed an additional impairment test as of December 31, 2009 and no additional impairment in value was noted. During the three months ended June 30, 2010, the Company determined it was necessary to record a second impairment charge totaling approximately $555 thousand, writing the value of the investment to zero. This was deemed necessary by management based upon their consideration of Debtfolio, Inc.’s continued negative cash flow from operations, current financial position and lack of current liquidity. In October 2011, Debtfolio, Inc. repurchased the Company’s ownership stake in exchange for a subordinated promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of approximately $0.6 million$555 thousand payable on October 31, 2014. On October 28, 2014, a revised subordinated promissory note with revised repayment terms was agreed to which required cash payments totaling $255 thousand during 2014, and eight quarterly installments of approximately $48 thousand plus 5% simple interest during 2015 and 2016. As of December 31, 2013,2015, all required payments have been received. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, we maintain a full valuation allowance against ourthis subordinated promissory note due to the uncertainty of eventual collection.

 

F-32

F-32 

(14)(13) Restructuring and Other Charges

 

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recognized restructuring and other charges totaling approximately $386 thousand primarily related to noncash stock-based compensation costs in connection with the accelerated vesting of certain restricted stock units for a terminated employee (the “2013 Restructuring”).

 

The following table displays the activity of the 2013 Restructuring reserve account during the year ended December 31, 2013:

 

Restructuring and other charges $385,610  $385,610 
Noncash deductions  (393,195)  (393,195)
Adjustment to prior estimate  7,585   7,585 
Ending balance $  $- 

 

During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company implemented a targeted reduction in force. Additionally, in accessing the ongoing needs of the organization, the Company elected to discontinue using certain software as a service, consulting and data providers, and elected to write-off certain previously capitalized software development projects. The actions were taken after a review of the Company’s cost structure with the goal of better aligning the cost structure with the Company’s revenue base. These restructuring efforts resulted in restructuring and other charges from continuing operations of approximately $3.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2012. Additionally, as a result of the Company’s acquisition of The Deal in September 2012, the Company discontinued the use of The Deal’s office space and implemented a reduction in force to eliminate redundant positions, resulting in restructuring and other charges from continuing operations of approximately $3.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2012. In August 2015, the Company received a one year notice of termination under which the landlord elected to terminate The Deal’s office space lease. As a result, the Company is no longer obligated to fulfill the original full lease term. As such, the Company recorded an adjustment to its restructuring reserve totaling approximately $1.2 million, resulting in a restructuring and other charges credit on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. Collectively, these activities are referred to as the “2012 Restructuring”.

 

The following table displays the activity of the 2012 Restructuring reserve account from the initial charges during the first quarter of 2012 through December 31, 2013.2015. The remaining balance as of December 31, 20132015 relates to the lease for The Deal’s office space which expires in August 2021.2016.

  Workforce Reduction  Asset Write-Off  Termination of Vendor Services  Lease Termination $Total Workforce
Reduction
 Asset
Write-Off
 Termination
of Vendor
Services
 Lease
Termination
 Total 
Restructuring charge $3,307,330 $954,302 $ 531,828 $2,085,000   6,878,460 $3,307,330  $954,302  $531,828  $2,085,000  $6,878,460 
Noncash charges  (222,215)  (954,302)  (220,178)           -      (1,396,695)  (222,215)  (954,302)  (220,178)  -   (1,396,695)
Payments  (2,462,425)     -  (148,816)  (190,518)  (2,801,759)  (2,462,425)  -   (148,816)  (190,518)  (2,801,759)
Balance December 31, 2012  622,690     -  162,834  1,894,482   2,680,006  622,690   -   162,834   1,894,482   2,680,006 
Adjustments to prior estimates  (7,586)      -  5,446   27,130   24,990  (7,586)  -   5,446   27,130   24,990 
Payments  (615,104)     -  (168,280)   (640,200)   (1,423,584)
(Payments)/sublease income, net  (615,104)  -   (168,280)  (640,200)  (1,423,584)
Balance December 31, 2013 $- $ - $  - $$ 1,281,412 $1,281,412  -   -   -   1,281,412   1,281,412 
Adjustment to prior estimates  -   -   -   44,678   44,678 
(Payments)/sublease income, net  -   -   -   58,646   58,646 
Balance December 31, 2014  -   -   -   1,384,736   1,384,736 
Adjustment to prior estimates  -   -   -   (1,196,834)  (1,196,834)
(Payments)/sublease income, net  -   -   -   (88,593)  (88,593)
Balance December 31, 2015 $-  $-  $-  $99,309  $99,309 

 

In December 2011, the Company announced a management transition under which the Company’s chief executive officer would step down from his position by March 31, 2012. Additionally, in December 2011, a senior vice president separated from the Company. As a result of these activities, the Company incurred restructuring and other charges from continuing operations of approximately $1.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “2011 Restructuring”).

The following table displays the activity of the 2011 Restructuring reserve account from the initial charges during the fourth quarter 2011 through December 31, 2013:

F-33

Restructuring and other charges $1,825,799 
Noncash charges  (647,152)
Balance December 31, 2011  1,178,647 
Payments  (1,177,106)
Balance December 31, 2012  1,541 
Payments  (1,541)
Balance December 31, 2013 $ 

In March 2009, the Company announced and implemented a reorganization plan, including an approximate 8% reduction in the Company’s workforce, to align the Company’s resources with its strategic business objectives. Additionally, effective March 21, 2009 the Company’s then chief executive officer tendered his resignation, effective May 8, 2009 the Company’s then chief financial officer tendered his resignation, and in December 2009 the Company sold its Promotions.com subsidiary and entered into negotiations to sublease certain office space maintained by Promotions.com. As a result of these activities, the Company incurred restructuring and other charges from continuing operations of approximately $3.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “2009 Restructuring”). During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recorded a reduction to previously estimated charges resulting in a net credit of approximately $289 thousand.

 

The following table displays the activity of the 2009 Restructuring reserve account from the initial charges during the first quarter 2009 through December 31, 2013. The remaining balance as of December 31, 2013 relates to the Promotions.com office space which expiresits conclusion in February 2014.


Restructuring and other charges $3,460,914 
Noncash charges  (451,695)
Payments  (1,779,163)
Balance December 31, 2009  1,230,056 
Payments  (385,295)
Balance December 31, 2010  844,761 
Payments  (170,396)
Balance December 31, 2011  674,365 
Payments  (165,401)
Reduction to prior estimate  (288,667)
Balance December 31, 2012  220,297 
Payments  (124,023)
Balance December 31, 2013  96,274 
Reduction to prior estimate  (75,603)
Payments  (20,671)
Balance December 31, 2014 $- 

 

Restructuring and other charges $3,460,914 
Noncash charges  (451,695)
Payments  (1,779,163)
Balance December 31, 2009  1,230,056 
Payments  (385,295)
Balance December 31, 2010  844,761 
Payments  (170,396)
Balance December 31, 2011  674,365 
Payments  (165,401)
Reduction to prior estimate  (288,667)
Balance December 31, 2012  220,297 
Payments  (124,023)
Balance December 31, 2013 $96,274 

F-34

(15)(14) Other Liabilities

 

Other liabilities consist of the following:

 

 As of December 31,  As of December 31, 
 2013 2012  2015  2014 
Acquisition contingent earn-out $2,590,339  $2,602,105 
Deferred rent $2,629,798  $2,954,944   1,870,583   2,301,999 
Noncurrent restructuring charges  1,281,412   1,062,940 
Deferred revenue  758,119   283,698   897,453   619,443 
Other liabilities  2,092   39,167   2,092   1,892 
Noncurrent restructuring charges  -   1,384,736 
 $4,671,421  $4,340,749  $5,360,467  $6,910,175 

 

(16)(15) Employee Benefit Plan

 

The Company maintains a noncontributory savings plan in accordance with Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The 401(k) plan covers all eligible employees and throughemployees. For the year ended December 31, 20122013, the plan provided an employer match of 50% of employee contributions, up to a maximum of 4% of each employee’s total compensation within statutory limits. Effective January 1, 2013, the Company increased its matching contribution to 100% of employee contributions, up to a maximum of 6% of each employee’s total compensation within statutory limits. Effectivelimits, and effective January 1, 2014, the Company will be increasingincreased its matching contribution to 100% of employee contributions, up to a maximum of 8% of each employee’s total compensation within statutory limits.  The Company’s matching contribution totaled approximately $759 thousand, $123 thousand$1.7 million, $1.4 million and $297$759 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, 2012respectively.

F-35 

(16) Subsequent Event

On February 23, 2016, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had appointed Lawrence S. Kramer as interim President and 2011, respectively.Chief Executive Officer. The appointment followed the resignation of Elisabeth DeMarse as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and member of the Board of Directors. The change was effective immediately. The Company also entered into a Separation Agreement and Release of All Claims with Ms. DeMarse (the “Separation Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the Separation Agreement, Ms. DeMarse has agreed to provide transition services to the Company through February 29, 2016 (the “Separation Date”) and to release certain claims she may have against the Company and other released parties. The Company has agreed to pay or otherwise provide Ms. DeMarse with (1) amounts earned as an employee through the Separation Date, (2) an amount equal to $1,104,000, which reflects the amount of the cash payment to which Ms. DeMarse would have been entitled under her existing Amended and Restated Severance Agreement with the Company had she been terminated without cause, (3) reimbursement for premiums to continue Ms. DeMarse’s medical coverage pursuant to the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (“COBRA”) for 18 months, at the coverage levels in effect immediately prior to the Separation Date.

 

(17) Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

 

 For the Year Ended December 31, 2013  For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 
 First
Quarter
 Second
Quarter
 Third
Quarter
 Fourth
Quarter
  First
Quarter
 Second
Quarter
 Third
Quarter
 Fourth
Quarter
 
 (In thousands, except per share data)  (In thousands, except per share data) 
Total net revenue $12,580  $13,484  $13,585  $14,801  $16,890  $17,137  $16,662  $16,967 
Total operating expense $14,395  $14,627  $14,796  $14,628 
Total operating expense (Note)  17,601   17,521   16,033   16,740 
Net (loss) income $(1,743) $(1,076) $(1,179) $213   (977)  (671)  354   (249)
Basic and diluted net (loss) income per share $(0.05) $(0.03) $(0.03) $0.01 
Preferred stock cash dividends  96   96   96   96 
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders $(1,073) $(768) $258  $(346)
Basic and diluted net loss per share:                
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders $(0.03) $(0.02) $0.01  $(0.01)

 

 For the Year Ended December 31, 2012  For the Year Ended December 31, 2014 
 First
Quarter
 Second
Quarter
 Third
Quarter
 Fourth
Quarter
  First
Quarter
 Second
Quarter
 Third
Quarter
 Fourth
Quarter
 
 (In thousands, except per share data)  (In thousands, except per share data) 
Total net revenue $12,816  $12,481  $11,598  $13,826  $14,389  $14,762  $14,619  $17,283 
Total operating expense  17,349   14,464   15,916   16,131   15,554   15,435   15,113   18,355 
Net loss  (4,437)  (1,875)  (4,227)  (2,176)  (1,127)  (642)  (467)  (1,556)
Preferred stock cash dividends  96   97         96   96   96   96 
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(4,533) $(1,972) $(4,227) $(2,176) $(1,223) $(738) $(563) $(1,652)
Basic and diluted net loss per share:                                
Net loss $(0.14) $(0.06) $(0.13) $(0.07)
Preferred stock cash dividends  (0.00)  (0.00)      
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(0.14) $(0.06) $(0.13) $(0.07) $(0.04) $(0.02) $(0.02) $(0.05)

Note: In August 2015, the Company received a one year notice of termination under which the landlord elected to terminate The Deal’s office space lease resulting in a $1.2 million restructuring and other charges reduction to total operating expense.

F-35

SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 20122015, 2014 and 20112013

 

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Balance at
Beginning
of Period
 Provisions
Charged to
Expense
 Write-
offs
 Balance at
End of
Period
  Balance at
Beginning
of Period
 Provisions
Charged to
Expense
 Write-
offs
 Balance at
End of
Period
 
For the year ended December 31, 2015 $318,141  $129,108  $89,832  $357,417 
For the year ended December 31, 2014 $202,207  $202,340  $86,406  $318,141 
For the year ended December 31, 2013 $165,291  $80,819  $43,903  $202,207  $165,291  $80,819  $43,903  $202,207 
For the year ended December 31, 2012 $158,870  $114,870  $108,449  $165,291 
For the year ended December 31, 2011 $238,228  $182,946  $262,304  $158,870 

 

Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Allowance Balance at
Beginning
of Period
  Provisions
Charged to
Expense
  Write-
offs
  Balance at
end of
Period
 
For the year ended December 31, 2013 $62,493,958  $1,185,003  $  $63,678,961 
For the year ended December 31, 2012 $57,560,365  $4,933,593  $  $62,493,958 
For the year ended December 31, 2011 $52,803,494  $4,756,871  $  $57,560,365 
F-36

F-37 

EXHIBIT INDEX

  

Exhibit Incorporated by Reference   Incorporated by Reference
NumberDescriptionFormFile No.ExhibitFiling Date Description Form File No. Exhibit Filing Date
3.1Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company.8-K000-257793.1March 11, 2013 Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company. 8-K 000-25779 3.1 March 19, 2015
        
3.2Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company.10-K000-257793.1March 14, 2011 Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company. 10-K 000-25779 3.1 March 14, 2011
        
3.3Certificate of Amendment dated May 31, 2011 to Restated Certificate of Incorporation.8-K000-2577999.1June 2, 2011 Certificate of Amendment dated May 31, 2011 to Restated Certificate of Incorporation. 8-K 000-25779 99.1 June 2, 2011
        
3.4Certificate of Designation of the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock, as filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware on November 15, 2007.8-K000-257793.1November 20, 2007 Certificate of Designation of the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock, as filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware on November 15, 2007. 8-K 000-25779 3.1 November 20, 2007
        
4.1Specimen certificate for the Company’s shares of Common Stock.S-1/A333-727994.3April 19, 1999 Specimen certificate for the Company’s shares of Common Stock. S-1/A 333-72799 4.3 April 19, 1999
        
4.2Investor Rights Agreement dated November 15, 2007 by and among the Company, TCV VI, L.P. and TCV Member Fund, L.P.8-K000-257794.1November 20, 2007 Investor Rights Agreement dated November 15, 2007 by and among the Company, TCV VI, L.P. and TCV Member Fund, L.P. 8-K 000-25779 4.1 November 20, 2007
        
10.1+Form of Indemnification Agreement for directors and executive officers of the Company.10-K000-2577910.26March 7, 2012
10.1 Stock Purchase Agreement, dated October 7, 2014 by and between TheStreet, Inc., The Deal, LLC and Management Diagnostics Limited.  10-K 000-25779 10.1 March 5, 2015
        
10.2+Amended and Restated 2007 Performance Incentive Plan.14A000-25779 April 30, 2013 Severance Agreement Between TheStreet, Inc. and Erwin Eichmann, dated November 5, 2014 10-Q 000-25779 10.1 November 7, 2014
        
10.3Agreement of Lease, dated July 22, 1999, between 14 Wall Street Holdings 1, LLC (as successor to W12/14 Wall Acquisition Associates LLC) and the Company.10-Q000-2577910.1August 16, 1999
10.3+ Separation Agreement and Release of All Claims dated as of December 16, 2015 between the Company and Erwin Eichmann     
        
10.4Amendment of Lease dated October 31, 2001, between 14 Wall Street Holdings 1, LLC (as successor to W12/14 Wall Acquisition Associates LLC) and the Company.10-K000-2577910.12March 16, 2005
10.4+ Form of Indemnification Agreement for directors and executive officers of the Company. 10-K 000-25779 10.26 March 7, 2012
        
10.5Second Amendment of Lease dated March 21, 2007, between 14 Wall Street Holdings 1, LLC and the Company.10-K000-2577910.24March 14, 2008
10.5+ Amended and Restated 2007 Performance Incentive Plan. 14A 000-25779   April 30, 2013
        
10.6Third Amendment of Lease dated December 31, 2008, between CRP/Capstone 14W Property Owner, L.L.C. and the Company.10-K000-2577910.22March 13, 2009 Agreement of Lease, dated July 22, 1999, between 14 Wall Street Holdings 1, LLC (as successor to W12/14 Wall Acquisition Associates LLC) and the Company. 10-Q 000-25779 10.1 August 16, 1999
        
10.7Stock Purchase Agreement dated November 1, 2007 by and among BFPC Newco LLC, Larry Starkweather, Kyle Selberg, Rachelle Zorn, Robert Quinn and Larry Starkweather as Agent.8-K000-257792.1November 6, 2007 Amendment of Lease dated October 31, 2001, between 14 Wall Street Holdings 1, LLC (as successor to W12/14 Wall Acquisition Associates LLC) and the Company. 10-K 000-25779 10.12 March 16, 2005
        
10.8Securities Purchase Agreement dated November 15, 2007 by and among the Company, TCV VI, L.P. and TCV Member Fund, L.P.8-K000-2577910.1November 20, 2007 Second Amendment of Lease dated March 21, 2007, between 14 Wall Street Holdings 1, LLC and the Company. 10-K 000-25779 10.24 March 14, 2008
        
10.9Equity Interest Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 11, 2012 between TheStreet, Inc. and WPPN, L.P.8-K000-257792.1September 12, 2012 Third Amendment of Lease dated December 31, 2008, between CRP/Capstone 14W Property Owner, L.L.C. and the Company. 10-K 000-25779 10.22 March 13, 2009
        
10.10+Employment Letter dated as of March 7, 2012 between the Company and Elisabeth DeMarse.10-Q000-2577910.1May 7, 2012
10.10 Stock Purchase Agreement dated November 1, 2007 by and among BFPC Newco LLC, Larry Starkweather, Kyle Selberg, Rachelle Zorn, Robert Quinn and Larry Starkweather as Agent. 8-K 000-25779 2.1 November 6, 2007
        
10.11+Agreement for Grant of Incentive Stock Options dated as of March 7, 2012 between the Company and Elisabeth DeMarse.10-Q000-2577910.2May 7, 2012
10.11 Securities Purchase Agreement dated November 15, 2007 by and among the Company, TCV VI, L.P. and TCV Member Fund, L.P. 8-K 000-25779 10.1 November 20, 2007
        
10.12+Agreement for Grant of Non-Qualified Stock Options dated as of March 7, 2012 between the Company and Elisabeth DeMarse.10-Q000-2577910.3May 7, 2012
   
10.13+Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of March 7, 2012 between the Company and Elisabeth DeMarse.10-Q000-2577910.4May 7, 2012
10.12 Equity Interest Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 11, 2012 between TheStreet, Inc. and WPPN, L.P. 8-K 000-25779 2.1 September 12, 2012

10.13+ Employment Letter dated as of March 7, 2012 between the Company and Elisabeth DeMarse. 10-Q 000-25779 10.1 May 7, 2012
           
10.14+ Agreement for Grant of Incentive Stock Options dated as of March 7, 2012 between the Company and Elisabeth DeMarse. 10-Q 000-25779 10.2 May 7, 2012
           
10.15+ Agreement for Grant of Non-Qualified Stock Options dated as of March 7, 2012 between the Company and Elisabeth DeMarse. 10-Q 000-25779 10.3 May 7, 2012
           
10.16+ Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of March 7, 2012 between the Company and Elisabeth DeMarse. 10-Q 000-25779 10.4 May 7, 2012
           
10.17+ Amended and Restated Severance Agreement dated as of December 21, 2015 between the Company and Elisabeth DeMarse.        
           
10.18+ Separation Agreement and Release of All Claims dated as of February 22, 2016 between the Company and Elisabeth DeMarse.        
           
10.19+ Employment Offer Letter dated as of August 13, 2012 between the Company and Erwin Eichmann. 10-K 000-25773 10.23 February 22, 2013
           
10.20+ Sign-On Bonus Offer Letter dated as of August 13, 2012 between the Company and Erwin Eichmann. 10-K 000-25773 10.24 February 22, 2013
           
10.21+ Agreement for Grant of Incentive Stock Option dated as of August 17, 2012 between the Company and Erwin Eichmann. 10-K 000-25773 10.25 February 22, 2013
           
10.22+ Employment Offer Letter dated as of February 1, 2013 between the Company and John C. Ferrara. 10-K 000-25773 10.26 February 22, 2013
           
10.23+ Separation Agreement and General Release dated as of November 2, 2015 between the Company and John C. Ferrara. 10-Q 000-25779 10.2 November 5, 2015
           
10.24+ Form of Stock Option Grant Agreement under the Company’s 2007 Performance Incentive Plan. 10-K 000-25779 10.19 February 28, 2014
           
10.25+ Form of Agreement of Restricted Stock Units Under the Company’s 2007 Performance Incentive Plan. 10-K 000-25779 10.20 February 28, 2014
           
10.26+ Employment Agreement dated as of November 14, 2013 between James J. Cramer and the Company. 10-K 000-25779 10.21 February 28, 2014
           
10.27 Employment Offer Letter dated as of July 18, 2013 between the Company and Vanessa J. Soman. 10-K 000-25779 10.22 February 28, 2014
           
10.28+ Severance Agreement between TheStreet, Inc. and Vanessa J. Soman, dated January 26, 2015. 10-Q 000-25779 10.1 August 7, 2015
           
10.29+ Separation Agreement and General Release dated as of September 22, 2015 between the Company and Vanessa J. Soman. 10-Q 000-25779 10.1 November 5, 2015
           
10.30+ Employment Offer Letter dated as of January 19, 2016 between the Company and Eric Lundberg.        
           
10.31+ Severance Agreement dated as of January 19, 2016 between the Company and Eric Lundberg.        
           
10.32+ Agreement for Grant of Non-Qualified Stock Option dated as of January 19, 2016 between the Company and Eric Lundberg.        

10.33+Director Compensation Policy.
21.1Subsidiaries of the Company.
23.1Consent of BDO USA, LLP.
31.1Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of CEO.
31.2Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of CFO.
32.1Section 1350 Certification of CEO.
32.2Section 1350 Certification of CFO.
101.INS*XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Document
101.DEF*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Document
101.LAB*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Document
101.PRE*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Document 
10.14+Severance Agreement dated as of March 7, 2012 between the Company and Elisabeth DeMarse.10-Q000-2577910.5May 7, 2012
      
10.15+Employment Offer Letter dated as of August 13, 2012 between the Company and Erwin Eichmann.10-K000-2577310.23February 22, 2013
      
10.16+Sign-On Bonus Offer Letter dated as of August 13, 2012 between the Company and Erwin Eichmann.10-K000-2577310.24February 22, 2013
      
10.170+Agreement for Grant of Incentive Stock Option dated as of August 17, 2012 between the Company and Erwin Eichmann10-K000-2577310.25February 22, 2013
      
10.18+Employment Offer Letter dated as of February 1, 2013 between the Company and John C. Ferrara.10-K000-2577310.26February 22, 2013
      
10.19Form of Stock Option Grant Agreement under the Company’s 2007 Performance Incentive Plan.    
      
10.20Form of Agreement of Restricted Stock Units Under the Company’s 2007 Performance Incentive Plan.    
      
10.21Employment Agreement dated as of November 14, 2013 between James J. Cramer and the Company.    
      
10.22Employment Offer Letter dated as of July 18, 2013 between the Company and Vanessa J. Soman.    
      
14.1Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.8-K000-2577914.1January 31, 2005
      
21.1Subsidiaries of the Company.    
      
23.1Consent of BDO USA, LLP.    
      
23.2Consent of KPMG LLP.    
      
31.1Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of CEO.    
      
31.2Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of CFO.    
      
32.1Section 1350 Certification of CEO.    
      
32.2Section 1350 Certification of CFO.    
      
101.INS*XBRL Instance Document    
      
101.SCH*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document    
      
101.CAL*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Document    
      
101.DEF*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Document    
      
101.LAB*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Document    
      
101.PRE*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Document    

 

+

Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
*Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sectionssections.