UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
(Mark One)
   
þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20092010
OR
   
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                    to                    
Commission file number 1-13908
Invesco Ltd.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
   
Bermuda 98-0557567
(State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization) Identification No.)
   
1555 Peachtree Street, NE, Suite 1800, Atlanta, GA 30309
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:(404) 892-0896
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
   
Title of Each Class Name of Exchange on Which Registered
Common Shares, $0.20 par value per share New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
     Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yesþ Noo
     Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yeso Noþ
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yesþ Noo
     Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.o
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
       
Large accelerated filerþ Accelerated filero Non-accelerated filero Smaller reporting companyo
  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.) Yeso Noþ
     At June 30, 2009,2010, the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates was $7.3$6.3 billion, based on the closing price of the registrant’s Common Shares, par value U.S. $0.20 per share, on the New York Stock Exchange. At January 31, 2010,2011, the most recent practicable date, the number of Common Shares outstanding was 431,677,226.460,382,514.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
     The registrant will incorporate by reference information required in response to Part III, Items 10-14 in its definitive Proxy Statement for its annual meeting of shareholders, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2009.2010.
 
 

 


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS
     We include cross references to captions elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which we refer to as this “Report,” where you can find related additional information. The following table of contents tells you where to find these captions.
     
  Page 
  3 
PART I
    
  4 
  1110 
  2019 
  2019 
  2019 
  2019 
PART II
    
  2120 
  2422 
  2523 
  5675 
  6079 
  115143 
  115143 
  116144 
PART III
    
  117145 
  118146 
  118146 
  119147 
  119147 
PART IV
    
  120148 
 EX-4.8EX-10.11
 EX-4.8
EX-4.10
EX-10.1EX-10.12
 EX-21
 EX-23.1
 EX-31.1
 EX-31.2
 EX-32.1
 EX-32.2
 EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
 EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

2


SPECIAL CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
     This Report, the documents incorporated by reference herein, other public filings and oral and written statements by us and our management, may include statements that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States securities laws. These statements are based on the beliefs and assumptions of our management and on information available to us at the time such statements are made. Forward-looking statements include information concerning possible or assumed future results of our operations, expenses, earnings, liquidity, cash flows and capital expenditures, industry or market conditions, assets under management, acquisition activities and the effect of completed acquisitions, debt levels and our ability to obtain additional financing or make payments on our debt, legal and regulatory developments, demand for and pricing of our products and other aspects of our business or general economic conditions. In addition, when used in this Report, the documents incorporated by reference herein or such other documents or statements, words such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates,” “projects,” “forecasts,” and future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “may,” “could,” “should,” and “would,” and any other statement that necessarily depends on future events, are intended to identify forward-looking statements.
     Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance or other outcomes. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Although we make such statements based on assumptions that we believe to be reasonable, there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from our expectations. We caution investors not to rely unduly on any forward-looking statements.
     The following important factors, and other factors described elsewhere in this Report or incorporated by reference into this Report or contained in our other filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), among others, could cause our results to differ materially from any results described in any forward-looking statements:
variations in demand for our investment products or services, including termination or non-renewal of our investment advisory agreements;
significant changes in net asset flows into or out of the accounts we manage or declines in market value of the assets in, or redemptions or other withdrawals from, those accounts;
enactment of adverse state, federal or foreign legislation or changes in government policy or regulation (including accounting standards) affecting our operations, our capital requirements or the way in which our profits are taxed;
significant fluctuations in the performance of debt and equity markets worldwide;
exchange rate fluctuations, especially as against the U.S. dollar;
the effect of economic conditions and interest rates in the U.S. or globally;
our ability to compete in the investment management business;
the effect of consolidation in the investment management business;
limitations or restrictions on access to distribution channels for our products;
our ability to attract and retain key personnel, including investment management professionals;
the investment performance of our investment products;
our ability to acquire and integrate other companies into our operations successfully and the extent to which we can realize anticipated cost savings and synergies from such acquisitions;
changes in regulatory capital requirements;
our debt and the limitations imposed by our credit facility;
the effect of failures or delays in support systems or customer service functions, and other interruptions of our operations;
variations in demand for our investment products or services, including termination or non-renewal of our investment advisory agreements;
significant changes in net asset flows into or out of the accounts we manage or declines in market value of the assets in, or redemptions or other withdrawals from, those accounts;
enactment of adverse state, federal or foreign legislation or changes in government policy or regulation (including accounting standards) affecting our operations, our capital requirements or the way in which our profits are taxed;
significant fluctuations in the performance of debt and equity markets worldwide;
exchange rate fluctuations, especially as against the U.S. Dollar;
the effect of economic conditions and interest rates in the U.S. or globally;
our ability to compete in the investment management business;
the effect of consolidation in the investment management business;
limitations or restrictions on access to distribution channels for our products;
our ability to attract and retain key personnel, including investment management professionals;
the investment performance of our investment products;
our ability to acquire and integrate other companies into our operations successfully and the extent to which we can realize anticipated cost savings and synergies from such acquisitions;
changes in regulatory capital requirements;
our debt and the limitations imposed by our credit facility;
the effect of failures or delays in support systems or customer service functions, and other interruptions of our operations;
the occurrence of breaches and errors in the conduct of our business, including any failure to properly safeguard confidential and sensitive information;
the execution risk inherent in our ongoing company-wide transformational initiatives;
the effect of political or social instability in the countries in which we invest or do business;

3


the occurrence of breaches and errors in the conduct of our business, including any failure to properly safeguard confidential and sensitive information;
the execution risk inherent in our ongoing company-wide transformational initiatives;
the effect of political or social instability in the countries in which we invest or do business;
the effect of terrorist attacks in the countries in which we invest or do business and the escalation of hostilities that could result therefrom;
war and other hostilities in or involving countries in which we invest or do business; and
adverse results in litigation, including private civil litigation related to mutual fund fees and any similar potential regulatory or other proceedings.
the effect of terrorist attacks in the countries in which we invest or do business and the escalation of hostilities that could result therefrom;
war and other hostilities in or involving countries in which we invest or do business; and
adverse results in litigation, including private civil litigation related to mutual fund fees and any similar potential regulatory or other proceedings.
     Other factors and assumptions not identified above were also involved in the derivation of these forward-looking statements, and the failure of such other assumptions to be realized may also cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. For more discussion of the risks affecting us, please refer to Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors.”
     You should consider the areas of risk described above in connection with any forward-looking statements that may be made by us and our businesses generally. We expressly disclaim any obligation to update any of the information in this or any other public report if any forward-looking statement later turns out to be inaccurate, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. For all forward-looking statements, we claim the “safe harbor” provided by Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
PART I
     In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, unless otherwise specified, the terms “we,” “our,” “us,” “company,” “Invesco,” and “Invesco Ltd.” refer to Invesco Ltd., a company incorporated in Bermuda, and its subsidiaries.
Item 1.Business
Introduction
     Invesco is a leading independent global investment management company,manager, dedicated to helping peopleinvestors worldwide buildachieve their financial security.objectives. By delivering the combined power of our distinctive worldwide investment management capabilities, Invesco provides a comprehensive arrayrange of enduring investment products forstrategies and vehicles to our retail, institutional and high-net-worth clients around the world. Operating in more than 20 countries, Invesco had $423.1$616.5 billion in assets under management (AUM) as of December 31, 2009.2010.
     The key drivers of success for Invesco are long-term investment performance, effective distribution relationships, and high-quality client service delivered across a diverse spectrum of investment management capabilities, distribution channels, geographic areas and market exposures. By achieving success in these areas, we seek to generate competitive investment results, positive net flows, increased AUM and associated revenues. We are affected significantly by market movements, which are beyond our control; however, we endeavor to mitigate the impact of market movement by offeringmaintaining broad investment capability,diversification across asset classes, client domiciles and geographical diversification.geographies. We measure relative investment performance by comparing our investment capabilities to competingcompetitors’ products, industry benchmarks and client investment objectives. Generally, distributors, investment advisors and consultants take into consideration longer-term investment performance (e.g., three-year and five-year performance) in their selection of investment product and manager recommendations to their customers,clients, although shorter-term performance may also be an important consideration. Third-party ratings may also have an influence on client investment decisions. Quality of client service is monitored in a variety of ways, including periodic client satisfaction surveys, analysis of response times and redemption rates, competitive benchmarking of services and feedback from investment consultants.
     Invesco Ltd. is organized under the laws of Bermuda, and our common shares are listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “IVZ.” We maintain a Web site at www.invesco.com. (Information contained on our Web site shall not be deemed to be part of, or to be incorporated into, this document).

4


Strategy
     The company focuses on four key strategic priorities that are designed to further strengthen our business over time and help ensure our long-term success:
Achieve strong investment performance over the long term for our clients;
Deliver our investment capabilities anywhere in the world to meet our clients’ needs;

4


Deliver the combined power of our distinctive investment management capabilities anywhere in the world to meet our clients’ needs;
Unlock the power of our global operating platform by simplifying our processes and procedures and further integrating the support structures of our business globally; and
Continue to build a high-performance organization by fostering greater transparency, accountability and execution at all levels.
Harness the power of our global operating platform by continuously improving our processes and procedures and further integrating the support structures of our business globally; and
Perpetuate a high-performance organization by driving greater transparency, accountability and execution at all levels.
     Over the past four years,Since 2005 Invesco has taken a number of steps to leverage the individual strengths offurther unify our distinct investment centersbusiness and present the organization as a single firm to our clients around the world. We believe these changes have strengthened Invesco’s ability to operate more efficiently and effectively as an integrated, global organization.
     Since we take a unified approach to our business, we are presentingpresent our financial statements and other disclosures under the single operating segment “asset“investment management.”
Recent Developments
     On June 1, 2010, Invesco acquired Morgan Stanley’s retail asset management business, including Van Kampen Investments. The global economic recession,addition of this diversified business brought $114.6 billion in AUM across equity, fixed income and alternative asset classes (including mutual funds, variable insurance funds, separate accounts and unit investment trusts (UITs)). Furthermore, Invesco gained the general weakeningexperience, knowledge and expertise of government, agencynearly 600 investment, distribution and corporate credit,operations support professionals globally. This transformational combination:
Expanded the depth and breadth of our investment strategies, enabling us to offer an even more comprehensive range of investment capabilities and vehicles to our clients around the world;
Enhanced our ability to serve U.S. clients by positioning Invesco among the leading U.S. investment managers by AUM, diversity of investment teams and client profiles;
Deepened Invesco’s relationships with clients and strengthened our overall distribution capabilities; and
Further strengthened our position in the Japanese investment management market.
     Our goal from the dissolutionday we announced the transaction was to complete the preparatory integration work prior to close. With a focused effort across Invesco, we accomplished our goal and strategic redirection of certain large financial institutions, and the market volatility over the past two years has had a significant impact on our industry. These factors, among others, created a unique competitive opportunity for few investment management firms that were able to deliver superior relative investment performance, maintain their corporate financial strength, and remain intensely focused on their clients. We believe Invesco was onethe value of these few firms that was ablethe combined organization to emergeclients from this challenging economic and market environmentDay 1. Throughout the second half of 2010, we saw strong momentum in an improved competitive position.the combined business.
     Several investment, credit, and liquidity issues affected many key competitors within theIn addition to our acquisition of Morgan Stanley’s retail asset management industry, including significant economic and reputational exposure to asset-backed securities, illiquid credit derivatives, structured investment vehicles (SIVs), auction rate preferred shares, hedge funds that were effectively operating as Ponzi schemes, and securities lending programs that lost value. Invesco had little to no exposure to such factors. Furthermore, while some competitors were withdrawing from the marketplace, we were meeting regularly with clients, helping them navigate the difficult markets and sharing solutions to meet their long-term investment needs. That enhanced visibility allowed us to deepen our existing relationships and foster new ones, putting us in a strong position as clients began returning to the markets.
business, Invesco’s commitment to oura multi-year strategy set a firm foundation for the company’s many achievements during 2009, including:throughout the year. During 2010:
Relative investment performance remained strong across the enterprise, with 68% of ranked assets* performing ahead of peers on a 3-year basis at year end;
We focused on strengthening and deepening relationships with clients in key markets. For example, we maintained a market share ranking in the top three on all major platforms in the U.K. retail market and strengthened relationships with leading financial institutions in all U.S. retail channels, where 70% of AUM is with top 20 distributors;
We expanded our presence and improved our competitive advantage as a global investment manager in fast-growing, high-priority markets and segments;
We resumed our share repurchase program, purchasing 9.4 million shares for $192.2 million; and
We maintained strong inflows at Invesco PowerShares, and expanded our offering of intelligent exchange-traded funds (ETFs) within the Canadian marketplace through an innovative suite of mutual funds.
Relative investment performance remained strong across the enterprise in 2009, with 69% of assets performing ahead of peers on a 3-year basis at year end;
Maintaining the number one position for Invesco Perpetual in the U.K. for retail assets under management, with record net inflows, particularly in fixed income, and strong investment performance;
Positive fund flows for the year and record fixed income assets under management for Invesco Aim;
Selection by the U.S. Treasury, among only eight asset managers, to participate in the Public-Private Investment Program (PPIP);
*As of December 31, 2010, 68% of ranked assets were performing ahead of peers on a 3-year basis. Of total Invesco AUM, 61% were ranked at year-end. See Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Investment Capabilities Performance Overview,” for more discussion of AUM rankings by investment capability.

5


Launch of our mortgage REIT, Invesco Mortgage Capital, Inc. (IVR), an IPO which raised $200 million in equity. In January 2010, Invesco Mortgage Capital raised an additional $170 million;
75% of Invesco Fixed Income AUM above benchmark on a 3-year basis at year end, further building our reputation as a “safe hands” manager during a volatile time in the markets;
Successful launch of a $540 million Chinese equity fund in Japan, which was the third largest onshore China product offering in the local market;
Industry recognition of our Asian investment teams, including best equity group award for our China joint venture;
Continued strong flows at Invesco PowerShares, and the launch of intelligent exchange-traded funds (ETFs) to Canadian investors through an innovative suite of mutual funds;
Extended leadership position of the team at W.L. Ross & Co. with their unique investment discipline and ability to capture distressed market opportunities;
Continued growth of Invesco’s Hyderabad, India, facility, which was launched early in 2007 utilizing an outsourcing model commonly referred to as “build/operate/transfer.” The facility provides cost-effective support for our operations, technology and finance groups, and is now firmly established with an outsourced staff of more than 400. At such time that formal transfer of control of the facility moves to Invesco (expected to occur within the next 18 months), the current staff will become Invesco employees and will be added to Invesco’s headcount.
     Together, these efforts resulted in positive net flows for our business in each quarter of 2009. At the same time, reflecting the decline in global markets and resulting decline in the company’s assets under management,2010. Adjusted operating margin and net operating margin decreasedimproved to 18.4% and 25.9%34.5% in 2009, respectively,2010 from 22.6% and 31.6%28.5% in 2008, respectively. (See2009. See Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for a reconciliation of operating income to net operating income, and by calculation, a reconciliation of operating margin to netadjusted operating margin, and important additional disclosures.
     WeThroughout 2010, we continued to execute on our long-term strategy, making disciplined capital and resource allocation decisions, in a challenging environment, which we believe further improved our ability to serve our clients, reinforced our reputation as one of the premierea premier global asset managers,investment manager, and helped to deliver competitive levels of operating income and margins as we progressed through the year. In addition, we took steps to further strengthen our financial position and augment our capital flexibility through a successful capital raise andthe execution of a new credit facility.facility and the maintenance of a balanced approach to capital management. We retain a positive outlook by S&Phave received credit ratings of A3/Stable and stable outlook with Moody’s.
     Perhaps the most visible of our accomplishments in 2009 was our announcement in October that we are acquiring Morgan Stanley’s retail asset management business, including Van Kampen. The combination of our organizations has tremendous implications for Invesco’s business when the transaction closes in mid-2010. Through this transaction, we expect to expand the depthA-/Stable from Moody’s and breadth of our investment strategies, strengthen our overall distribution capabilities and greatly enhance our ability to serve clients, both in the U.S. and globally. The planned acquisition provided Invesco the opportunity to review its overall branding approach in the U.S. Under the new approach, beginning April 30, 2010, Invesco Aim will be rebrandedStandard & Poor’s credit rating agencies, respectively, as Invesco and AIM funds will be rebranded with the Invesco name (e.g., AIM Charter Fund will become Invesco Charter Fund). In addition, after the close of the transaction,date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the fourth quarter, Standard & Poor’s increased Invesco’s enterprise risk management (ERM) rating from “adequate” to “strong,” making Invesco will be added to the Van Kampen open-end fund names (e.g., Van Kampen Comstock Fund will become Invesco Van Kampen Comstock Fund), and Invesco will rebrand the Morgan Stanley products that are included in the transaction (e.g., Morgan Stanley Special Value Fund will become Invesco Special Value Fund).one of only four publicly rated investment managers with a “strong” ERM designation.
Certain Demographic and Industry Trends
     Demographic and economic trends around the world continue to transform the investment management industry and our business:
There is an increasing number of investors who seek external professional advicebusiness and investment managers to help them reach their financial goals.

6


Asunderscore the “baby boomer” generation continues to mature, there is an increasingly large segment of the world population that is reaching retirement age. Economic growth in emerging market countries has created a large and rapidly expanding global middle class and high net worth population with accelerating levels of wealth. As a result, globally, there is a high degree of demand for an array of investment solutions that span investment capabilities, with a particular emphasis on savings vehicles for retirement. We believe Invesco, as one of the few, truly global, independent investment managers is very well-positioned to attract these retirement assets through its enduring products that are focused on long-term investment performance,
We have seen increasing demand from clients for alpha and betaneed to be separated as investment strategies in the investment management industry. (“Alpha” is defined as excess return attributable to a manager, and “beta” refers to the return of an underlying benchmark.) This trend reflects how clients are differentiating between low-cost beta solutions such as passive, index and ETF products and higher-priced alpha strategies such as those offered by many alternative products.
Investors are increasingly seeking to invest outside their domestic markets. They seek firms that operatewell-diversified with broad capabilities globally and across asset classes:
There is an increasing number of investors who seek external professional advice and investment managers to help them reach their financial goals.
As the “baby boomer” generation continues to mature, there is an increasingly large segment of the world population that is reaching retirement age. Economic growth in emerging market countries has created a large and rapidly expanding middle class and high net worth population with accelerating levels of wealth. As a result, globally, there is a high degree of demand for an array of investment solutions that span the breadth of investment capabilities, with a particular emphasis on savings vehicles for retirement. We believe Invesco, as one of the few truly global, independent investment managers, is very well-positioned to attract these retirement assets through its enduring products that are focused on long-term investment performance.
We have seen increasing demand from clients for alpha and beta to be separated as investment strategies in the investment management industry. (“Alpha” is defined as excess return attributable to a manager, and “beta” refers to the volatility in returns versus an underlying benchmark.) This trend reflects how clients are differentiating between low-cost beta solutions such as passive, index and ETF products and higher-priced alpha strategies such as those offered by many alternative products.
Investors are increasingly seeking to invest outside their domestic markets. They seek firms that operate globally and have investment expertise in markets around the world.
Although the U.S. and Europe are currently the two largest markets for financial assets by a wide margin, other markets in the world, such as China and India, are rapidly growing. As these population-heavy markets mature, investment managers that are truly global will be in the best position to capture this growth. Additionally, population age differences between emerging and developed markets will result in differing investment needs and horizons among countries. Asset allocation and pension type also differ substantially among countries. Invesco has a meaningful and expanding market presence in many of the world’s fastest growing and wealthiest regions, including the U.S., Canada, Western Europe and the UK, the Middle East and Asia-Pacific. Our strong U.S. presence and growing global presence represent significant long-term growth prospects for our business.
The global trend towards the provision of defined contribution retirement plans continues, although significant opportunity remains for managers to increase defined benefit market share.
     Invesco is well positioned to capture the world. Invesco, with a comprehensive range of investment capabilities managedopportunities created by distinct investment teams worldwide, is well-positioned to benefit from this trend.
     Our four strategic priorities and our plans for taking the business forward acknowledge theseglobal demographic and industry trends. Through a variety of economic trends, as we work to further strengthenand market environments, our progress over the past five years has significantly strengthened our competitive position. Our multi-year strategy is designed to leverage our global presence, our distinctive worldwide investment management capabilities and our talented people to further grow our business and ensure our long-term success.

6


Investment Management Capabilities
     Invesco is a leading independent global investment manager with operations in 20 countries. As of December 31, 2009, Invesco managed $423.1 billion in assets for retail, institutional and high-net-worth investors around the world. By delivering the combined power of our distinctive worldwide investment management capabilities, Invesco provides a comprehensive array of enduring solutions for our clients.
     Supported by a global operating platform, Invesco delivers a comprehensive array of investment productscapabilities and services to retail, institutional and high-net-worth investors on a global basis. We have a significant presence in the institutional and retail segments of the investment management industry in North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific, withserving clients in more than 100150 countries.
     We believe that the proven strength of our distinct and globally located investment centers and their well-defined investment disciplines provide us with a competitive advantage in the eyes of many of our clients.advantage. There are few independent investment managers with teams as globally diverse as Invesco’s and with the same breadth and depth of investment capabilities and products.vehicles. We offer multiple investment objectives within the various asset classes and products that we manage. Our asset classes, broadly defined, include money market, fixed income, balanced, equity and alternatives. Approximately 41%48% of our AUM as of December 31, 2009, was2010, were invested in equitiesequity securities (December 31, 2008: 36% in equities)2009: 41%), with the balanceand approximately 52% was invested in fixed income and other securities.investments (December 31, 2009: 59%).

7


     The following table sets forth the investment objectives, by which we manage, sorted by asset class:class, which we manage:
Investment Objectives by Asset Class
         
Money Market Fixed Income Balanced Equity Alternatives
PrimeConvertiblesSingle CountrySmall Cap CoreFinancial Structures
Cash Plus
Government/Treasury
Core/Core PlusGlobalSmall Cap GrowthAbsolute Return

Prime
Taxable
Tax-Free
 Bank Loans
Convertibles
Core/Core Plus
Emerging Markets
Enhanced Cash
Government Bonds
High-Yield Bonds
Intermediate Term
International/Global
Investment Grade Credit
Municipal Bonds
Passive/Enhanced
Short Term
Stable Value
Structured Securities
   (ABS, MBS, CMBS)
 Asset Allocation
Global
Single Country
Target Date
Target Risk
 Enhanced Index/Quantitative
Global
International
Large Cap Core
Large Cap Growth
Large Cap Value
Mid Cap Core
Mid Cap Growth
Mid Cap Value
Regional/Single Country
Sector Funds
Small Cap Core
Small Cap Growth
Small Cap Value
 U.S. REITS
Cash PlusEnhanced CashTarget DateMid Cap CoreAbsolute Return
Asian Direct Real Estate
Commodities
Currencies
European Direct Real Estate
Financial Structures
Global Macro
Global REITS
TaxableGovernment BondsTarget
Private Capital - Direct
Private Capital - Fund of Funds
Risk
Mid Cap Growth Premia Capture
U.S. Direct Real Estate
High-Yield BondsMid Cap ValueEuropean Direct Real Estate
Bank LoansLarge Cap CoreAsian Direct Real Estate
Passive/EnhancedLarge Cap GrowthPrivate Capital Direct Investments
Intermediate TermLarge Cap ValuePrivate Capital Fund of Funds
International/GlobalEnhanced Index QuantitativePrivate Capital Distressed
Municipal BondsSector FundsPortable Alpha
Short TermInternationalAlternative Beta
Stable ValueGlobalGTAA/Global Macro
Structured SecuritiesRegional/Single Country
    (ABS, MBS, CMBS)
Investment Grade Credit
U.S. REITS
     The following table sets forth the categories of productsinvestment vehicles sold through our three principal distribution channels:
Investment Vehicles by Distribution Channel
     
Retail Institutional Private Wealth Management
Closed-end Mutual FundsInstitutional Separate
Exchange-Traded Funds
Individual Savings Accounts
Separate Accounts

Investment Companies with Variable Capital
Investment Trusts
Open-end Mutual Funds
Separately Managed Accounts
Unit Investment Trusts
Variable Insurance Funds
 Collective Trust FundsManaged
Exchange-Traded Funds
Institutional Separate Accounts
Investment TrustsManaged AccountsMutual Funds
Individual Savings AccountsExchange-Traded
Private Capital Funds
 Exchange-Traded Funds
Exchange-Traded
Managed Accounts
Mutual Funds

Private Capital Funds
Private Capital Funds
Variable Insurance Funds
Separate Accounts

87


     One of Invesco’s greatest competitive strengths is the diversification in ourits AUM by client domicile, distribution channel and asset class. Our distribution network has gathered assets of approximately 49%61% retail, 47%36% institutional, and 4%3% Private Wealth Management clients. 39%clients as of December 31, 2010. 32.6% of client assets under management are outside the U.S., and we serviceserve clients in more than 100150 countries. The following tables present a breakdown of AUM by client domicile, distribution channel and asset class as of December 31, 2009:2010. Additionally, the fourth table below illustrates the split of our higher-fee non-passive AUM as compared to our lower-fee ETF, UIT, and passive AUM.
AUM Diversification

By Client Domicile
         
($ billions)     1-Yr Change
     
U.S. $415.4   41.2%
Canada $27.9   (3.8)%
U.K. $92.1   8.5%
Continental Europe $35.3   44.7%
Asia $45.8   69.0%
     
         
Total
 $616.5   34.2%
         


By Distribution Channel
         
($ billions)     1-Yr Change
     
Retail $378.4   58.1%
Institutional $221.1   7.9%
PWM $17.0   11.8%
       
         
Total
 $616.5   34.2%


By Asset Class
         
($ billions)     1-Yr Change
     
Equity $294.1   52.6%
Balanced $43.5   9.0%
Money Market $68.3   (18.2)%
Fixed Income $131.9   73.3%
Alternative $78.7   16.9%
       
         
Total
 $616.5   34.2%
         


Non-Passive/Passive
         
($ billions)     1-Yr Change
     
Non-Passive $535.7   31.8%
ETF, UIT, and Passive $80.8   52.5%
       
         
Total
 $616.5   34.2%


8


See Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 12,18, Geographic Information,” for a geographic breakdown of our consolidated operating revenues for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 2008 and 2007.2008.

9


Distribution Channels
     Channel refers to the distribution channel from which the AUM originated. Retail AUM arose from client investments into funds available to the public with shares or units. Institutional AUM originated from individual corporate clients, endowments, foundations, government authorities, universities, or charities. Private Wealth Management AUM arose from high net worth client investments.
Retail
     Invesco is a significant provider of retail investment solutions to clients through our distribution channels:in all major markets: Invesco Aim in the U.S., Invesco Trimark in Canada, Invesco Perpetual in the U.K., Invesco in Europe and Asia, and Invesco PowerShares (for our ETF products). Additionally, Invesco is now also a market leading sponsor of UIT products as a result of the acquisition of Morgan Stanley’s retail asset management business. Collectively, the retail investment management teams managemanaged assets of $206.9$378.4 billion as of December 31, 2009.2010. We offer retail products within all of the major asset classes (money market, fixed income, balanced, equity and alternatives). Our retail products are primarily distributed through third-party financial intermediaries, including traditional broker-dealers, fund “supermarkets,” retirement platforms, financial advisors, banks, insurance companies and trust companies.
     The U.K., U.S. and Canadian retail operations rank among the largest by AUM in their respective markets. As of December 31, 2009,2010, Invesco Perpetual was the largestNo. 1 retail fund provider in the U.K., Invesco Aim; Invesco’s U.S. retail business was the 15th9th largest non-proprietary mutual fund complex in the U.S., by long-term assets, including the Invesco Powershares franchise; and Invesco Trimark was the 9th9th largest retail fund manager in Canada and in addition,by long-term assets. Invesco Great Wall, our joint venture in China, was one of the largest Sino-foreign managers of equity products in China, with AUM of approximately $8$7.2 billion as of December 31, 2009.2010. Invesco PowerShares adds a leading set of ETF products (with $15$55.7 billion in AUM and 120176 exchange-traded funds as of December 31, 2009)2010) to the extensive choices we make available to our retail investors. We believe that we provide our retail clients with one of the industry’s most robust and comprehensive product lines.
Institutional
     We provide investment solutions to institutional investors globally, with a major presence in the U.S., U.K., Continental Europe and Asia-Pacific regions through Invesco and Invesco Aim ($201.0with $221.1 billion in AUM as of December 31, 2009).2010. We offer a broad suite of domestic and global products, including traditional equities, structured equities, fixed income (including money market funds for institutional clients), real estate, private equity, distressed equities, financial structures and absolute return strategies. Regional sales forces distribute our products and provide services to clients and intermediaries around the world. We have a diversified client base that includes major public entities, corporations, unions, non-profit organizations, endowments, foundations, pension funds and financial institutions. Clients of Invesco Aim’sInvesco’s institutional money market funds included 20serve some of the 25 largest commercial banksfinancial institutions and corporations in the U.S., 11 of the 20 largest global banks, and 10 of the Fortune 20 corporations as of December 31, 2009.world.
Private Wealth Management
     Through Atlantic Trust, Invesco provides high-net-worth individuals and their families with a broad range of personalized and sophisticated wealth management services, including financial counseling, estate planning, asset allocation, investment management (including use of third-party managed investment products), private equity, trust, custody and family office services. Atlantic Trust also provides assetinvestment management services to foundations and endowments. Atlantic Trust obtains new clients through referrals from existing clients, recommendations from other professionals serving the high-net-worth market, such as attorneys and accountants, and from financial intermediaries, such as brokers. Atlantic Trust has offices in 11 U.S. cities and managed $15.2$17.0 billion as of December 31, 2009.2010.
Employees
     As of December 31, 2009,2010, we had 4,8905,617 employees across the globe. As of December 31, 20082009 and 2007,2008, we had 5,3254,890 and 5,4755,325 employees, respectively. None of our employees is covered under collective bargaining agreements. Formal hiring of staff in our Hyderabad, India, facility commenced with 83 individuals becoming our employees in late 2010. An additional 474 individuals became our employees by the date of this Report.

9


Competition
     The investment management business is highly competitive, with points of differentiation including investment performance, the range of products offered, brand recognition, business reputation, financial strength, the depth and continuity of relationships, quality of service and the level of fees charged for services. We compete with a large number of investment management firms, commercial banks, investment banks, broker dealers, hedge funds, insurance companies and other financial institutions. We believe that the quality and diversity of our investment styles, product types and channels of distribution enable us to compete effectively in the investment management business. We also believe being an independent investment manager is a competitive advantage, as our business model avoids conflicts that are inherent within institutions that both distribute and/or serve investment products and manage investment products. Lastly, we believe continued execution against our multi-year strategy will further strengthen our long-term competitive position.

10


Management Contracts
     We derive substantially all of our revenues from investment management contracts with clientsfunds and funds.other clients. Fees vary with the type of assets being managed, with higher fees earned on actively managed equity and balanced accounts, along with real estate and alternative asset products, and lower fees earned on fixed income, money market and stable value accounts.accounts, as well as certain ETFs. Investment management contracts are generally terminable upon thirty or fewer days’ notice. Typically, retail investors may withdraw their funds at any time without prior notice. Institutional and private wealth management clients may elect to terminate their relationship with us or reduce the aggregate amount of assets under management with very short-noticeshort notice periods.
Available Information
     We file current and periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC, copies of which can be obtained from the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
     The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC, at www.sec.gov. We make available free of charge on our Web site, www.invesco.com, our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC.
Item 1A.Risk Factors
Recent volatilityVolatility and disruption in world capital and credit markets, as well as adverse changes in the global economy, havecan negatively affectedaffect Invesco’s revenues and may continue to do so.
     The capital and credit markets have been experiencing substantial volatility and disruption for over a year.since 2007. While these disruptions moderated to some extent following the March 2009 lows in equity markets, historical norms have not returned and the potential for extreme disruptions remains. These market events have materially impacted our results of operations, and may continue to do so, and could materially impact our financial condition and liquidity. In this regard:
The volatility of global market conditions around the world has resulted, and may continue to result, in significant volatility in our assets under management and in our revenues, driven by market value fluctuations on our managed portfolios.
In addition to the impact of the market values on client portfolios, the illiquidity and volatility of both the global fixed income and equity markets could negatively affect our ability to manage client inflows and outflows from pooled investment vehicles or to timely meet client redemption requests.
Our money market funds have always maintained a $1.00 net asset value (NAV); however, we do not guarantee such level. Market conditions could lead to severe liquidity issues in money market products, which could affect their NAVs. If the NAV of one of our money market funds were to decline below $1.00 per share, such funds could experience significant redemptions in assets under management, loss of shareholder confidence and reputational harm. The SEC has recently adopted new rules governing U.S. registered money market funds. These new rules are designed to significantly strengthen the regulatory requirements governing money market funds, increase the resilience of such funds to economic stresses, and reduce the risk of runs on these funds. Regulators in the U.S. are evaluating whether to propose mandating a variable (“floating”) NAV for money market funds. The company believes such a change would have significant adverse consequences on the money market funds industry and the short-term credit markets.
Even if legislative or regulatory initiatives or other efforts successfully stabilize and add liquidity to the financial markets, we may need to modify our strategies, businesses or operations, and we may incur increased capital requirements and constraints or additional costs in order to satisfy new regulatory requirements or to compete in a changed business environment.
The volatility of global market conditions around the world has resulted, and may continue to result, in significant volatility in our assets under management and in our revenues, driven by market value fluctuations on our managed portfolios.
In addition to the impact of the market values on client portfolios, the illiquidity and volatility of both the global fixed income and equity markets could negatively affect our ability to manage client inflows and outflows from pooled investment vehicles or to timely meet client redemption requests.
Our money market funds have always maintained a $1.00 net asset value (NAV); however, we do not guarantee such level. Market conditions could lead to severe liquidity issues in money market products, which could affect their NAVs. If the NAV of one of our money market funds were to decline below $1.00 per share, such funds could experience significant redemptions in assets under management, loss of shareholder confidence and reputational harm. In 2010 the SEC adopted new rules governing U.S. registered money market funds. These rules are designed to significantly strengthen the regulatory requirements governing money market funds, increase the resilience of such funds to economic stresses, and

1110


In the event of extreme circumstances, including economic, political, or business crises, such as a widespread systemic failure in the global financial system or additional failures of firms that have significant obligations as counterparties on financial instruments, we may suffer further significant declines in assets under management and severe liquidity or valuation issues in the short-term sponsored investment products in which client and company assets are invested, all of which would adversely affect our operating results, financial condition, liquidity, credit ratings, ability to access capital markets, and retention and ability to attract key employees. Additionally, these factors could impact our ability to realize the carrying value of our goodwill.
reduce the risk of runs on these funds. Regulators in the U.S. continue to evaluate whether to propose mandating a variable (“floating”) NAV for money market funds. The company believes such a change would have significant adverse consequences on the money market funds industry and the short-term credit markets.
Even if legislative or regulatory initiatives or other efforts successfully stabilize and add liquidity to the financial markets, we may need to modify our strategies, businesses or operations, and we may incur increased capital requirements and constraints or additional costs in order to satisfy new regulatory requirements or to compete in a changed business environment.
In the event of extreme circumstances, including economic, political, or business crises, such as a widespread systemic failure in the global financial system or additional failures of firms that have significant obligations as counterparties on financial instruments, we may suffer significant declines in assets under management and severe liquidity or valuation issues in the short-term sponsored investment products in which client and company assets are invested, all of which would adversely affect our operating results, financial condition, liquidity, credit ratings, ability to access capital markets, and retention and ability to attract key employees. Additionally, these factors could impact our ability to realize the carrying value of our goodwill and other intangible assets.
We may not adjust our expenses quickly enough to match further significant deterioration in global financial markets.
     In response to significant reductions in our assets under management related to recent adverse changes in world financial markets, we have undertaken a variety of efforts to achieve cost savings and reduce our overall operating expenses.     If we are unable to effect appropriate expense reductions in a timely manner in response to declines in our revenues, or if we are otherwise unable to adapt to rapid changes in the global marketplace, our profitability, financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.
Our revenues would be adversely affected by any reduction in assets under our management as a result of either a decline in market value of such assets or net outflows, which would reduce the investment management fees we earn.
     We derive substantially all of our revenues from investment management contracts with clients. Under these contracts, the investment management fees paid to us are typically based on the market value of assets under management. Assets under management may decline for various reasons. For any period in which revenues decline, our income and operating margin may decline by a greater proportion because certain expenses remain relatively fixed. Factors that could decrease assets under management (and therefore revenues) include the following:
     Declines in the market value of the assets in the funds and accounts managed.These could be caused by price declines in the securities markets generally or by price declines in the market segments in which those assets are concentrated. Approximately 41%48% of our total assets under management were invested in equity securities and approximately 59%52% were invested in fixed income and other securitiesinvestments at December 31, 2009. Through the date of the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K with the SEC, markets continue to be volatile.2010. Our AUM as of January 31, 2010,2011, was $412.6$624.3 billion. We cannot predict whether the continued volatility in the markets will result in substantial or sustained declines in the securities markets generally or result in price declines in market segments in which our assets under management are concentrated. Any of the foregoing could negatively impact our revenues, income and operating margin.
     Redemptions and other withdrawals from, or shifting among, the funds and accounts managed. These could be caused by investors (in response to adverse market conditions or pursuit of other investment opportunities) reducing their investments in funds and accounts in general or in the market segments on which Invesco focuses; investors taking profits from their investments; poor investment performance of the funds and accounts managed by Invesco; and portfolio risk characteristics, which could cause investors to move assets to other investment managers. Poor performance relative to other investment management firms tends to result in decreased sales, increased redemptions of fund shares, and the loss of private institutional or individual accounts, with corresponding decreases in our revenues. Failure of our funds and accounts to perform well could, therefore, have a material adverse effect on us. Furthermore, the fees we earn vary with the types of assets being managed, with higher fees earned on actively managed equity and balanced accounts, along with real estate and alternative asset products, and lower fees earned on fixed income and stable return accounts. Therefore, our revenues may decline if clients shift their investments to lower fee accounts.
     Declines in the value of seed capital and partnership investments.The company has investments in sponsored investment products that invest in a variety of asset classes, including, but not limited to equities, fixed income products, private equity, and real estate. Investments in these products are generally made to establish a track record, meet purchase size requirements for trading blocks, or demonstrate economic alignment with other investors in our funds. Adverse market conditions may result in the need to write down the value of these seed capital and partnership investments. As of December 31, 2009,2010, the company had $151.8$198.0 million in seed capital and partnership investments.

11


Our investment advisory agreements are subject to termination or non-renewal, and our fund and other investors may withdraw their assets at any time.
     Substantially all of our revenues are derived from investment advisory agreements. Investment advisory agreements are generally terminable upon 30 or fewer days’ notice. Agreements with U.S. mutual funds may be terminated with notice, or terminated in the

12


event of an “assignment” (as defined in the Investment Company Act), and must be renewed annually by the disinterested members of each fund’s board of directors or trustees, as required by law. In addition, the board of trustees or directors of certain other fund accounts of Invesco or our subsidiaries generally may terminate these investment advisory agreements upon written notice for any reason. Mutual fund and unit trust investors may generally withdraw their funds at any time without prior notice. Institutional clients may elect to terminate their relationships with us or reduce the aggregate amount of assets under our management, and individual clients may elect to close their accounts, redeem their shares in our funds, or shift their funds to other types of accounts with different fee structures. Any termination of or failure to renew a significant number of these agreements, or any other loss of a significant number of our clients or assets under management, would adversely affect our revenues and profitability.
Our revenues and profitability from money market and other fixed income assets may be harmed by interest rate, liquidity and credit volatility.
     In a rising-rate environment, certainCertain institutional investors using money market products and other short-term duration fixed income products for cash management purposes may shift these investments to direct investments in comparable instruments in order to realize higher yields than those available in money market and other fund products holding lower yielding instruments. These redemptions would reduce managed assets, thereby reducing our revenues. In addition, rising interest rates will tend to reduce the market value of bonds held in various investment portfolios and other products. Thus, increases in interest rates could have an adverse effect on our revenues from money market portfolios and from other fixed income products. If securities within a money market portfolio default, or investor redemptions force the portfolio to realize losses, there could be negative pressure on its net asset value. Although money market investments are not guaranteed instruments, the company might decide, under such a scenario, that it is in its best interest to provide support in the form of a support agreement, capital infusion, or other methods to help stabilize a declining net asset value. Some of these methods could have an adverse impact on our profitability. Additionally, we have $17.9$32.9 million invested in Invesco Mortgage Capital, Inc., $23.3 million of equity at risk invested in our collateralized loan obligation products, and $7.1 million invested in fixed income seed money at December 31, 2010, the valuation of which could change with changes in interest and default rates.
We operate in an industry that is highly regulated in many countries, and any adverse changes in the laws or regulations governing our business could decrease our revenues and profitability.
     As with all investment management companies, our activities are highly regulated in almost all countries in which we conduct business. Laws and regulations applied at the national, state or provincial and local level generally grant governmental agencies and industry self-regulatory authorities broad administrative discretion over our activities, including the power to limit or restrict business activities. Subsidiaries operating in the European Union (EU) also are subject to various EU Directives, which are implemented by member state national legislation. Possible sanctions include the revocation of licenses to operate certain businesses, the suspension or expulsion from a particular jurisdiction or market of any of our business organizations or their key personnel, the imposition of fines and censures on us or our employees and the imposition of additional capital requirements. It is also possible that laws and regulations governing our operations or particular investment products could be amended or interpreted in a manner that is adverse to us.
     Certain of our subsidiaries are required to maintain minimum levels of capital. These and other similar provisions of applicable law may have the effect of limiting withdrawals of capital, repayment of intercompany loans and payment of dividends by such entities. After redomicile and after consultation with the U.K. Financial Services Authority (FSA), it has been determined that, for the purposes of prudential supervision, Invesco Ltd. is not subject to regulatory consolidated capital requirements under current European Union (EU) Directives. A sub-group however,of Invesco subsidiaries, including all of our regulated EU subsidiaries, is subject to these consolidated capital requirements under EU Directives, and capital is maintained within this sub-group to satisfy these regulations. At December 31, 2009,2010, the European sub-group had cash and cash equivalent balances of $333.5$456.2 million, much of which is used to satisfy these regulatory requirements. Complying with our regulatory commitments may result in an increase in the capital requirements applicable to the European sub-group. As a result of corporate restructuring and the regulatory undertakings that we have given, certain of these EU subsidiaries may be required to limit their dividends to the parent company, Invesco Ltd. We cannot guarantee that further corporate restructuring will not be required to comply with applicable legislation.
     The regulatory environment in which we operate frequently changes and has seen significant increased regulation in recent years. We may be adversely affected as a result of new or revised legislation or regulations or by changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws and regulations. To the extent that existing regulations are amended or future regulations are adopted that reduce the sale, or increase the redemptions, of our products and services, or that negatively affect the investment performance of our products, our aggregate assets under management and our revenues could be adversely affected. In addition, regulatory changes could impose additional costs, which could negatively impact our profitability.

1312


     Various changes in law and regulation have been enacted or adopted and are beginning to be implemented or otherwise developed in multiple jurisdictions globally in response to the crisis in the financial markets that began in 2007. Various other proposals remain under consideration by various legislators, regulators, legislators, other government officials and other public policy commentators have proposed orcommentators. Certain enacted provisions and certain other proposals are considering proposals for regulatory reform in response to the ongoing crisis in the financial markets. Certain proposals arepotentially far reaching and, if enacteddepending upon their implementation, could have a material impact on Invesco’s business. While many of these proposals areprovisions appear designed to address perceived problems in the banking sector, certain of the proposals couldprovisions will or may be applied to other financial services companies, including assetinvestment managers. Potential developments include:
Expanded prudential regulation over     In the United States, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) was signed into law on July 21, 2010. While Invesco does not at this time believe that the Dodd-Frank Act will fundamentally change the investment management firms.
Newindustry or increased capital requirementscause Invesco to reconsider its fundamental strategy, it does appear that certain provisions will, and other provisions may, increase regulatory burdens and related regulation (including new capital requirements pertaining to money market funds)
Fundamental change to the regulation of money market funds in the U.S. The SEC has recently proposed changes to Rule 2a-7, the primary securities regulation governing U.S. registered money market funds. The SEC has recently adopted new rules governing U.S. registered money market funds. These new rules are designed to significantly strengthen the regulatory requirements governing money market funds, increase the resilience of such funds to economic stresses, and reduce the risk of runs on these funds. Regulators in the U.S. are evaluating whether to propose mandating a variable (“floating”) NAV for money market funds. The company believes such a change would have significant adverse consequences on the money market funds industry and the short-term credit markets.
Changes impacting certain other products or markets (e.g., retirement savings).
Enhanced licensing and qualification requirements for key personnel.
Other additional rules and regulations and disclosure requirements. Certain proposals would impose additional disclosure burdens on public companies, including Invesco. Certain of these proposals could impose requirements for more widespread disclosures of compensation to highly-paid individuals. Depending uponcompliance costs. In addition, the scope of anymany provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act will be determined by implementing regulations, some of which will require lengthy proposal and promulgation periods. Moreover, the Dodd-Frank Act mandates many regulatory studies, some of which pertain directly to the investment management industry, which could lead to additional legislation or regulation. As a result of these uncertainties regarding implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act and such requirements,other future potential legislative or regulatory changes, the company couldimpact of the Dodd-Frank Act on the investment management industry and Invesco cannot be disadvantaged in retaining key employees vis-à-vis private companies,predicted at this time.
     The European Union has promulgated or is considering various new or revised Directives pertaining to financial services, including hedge fund sponsors.
Other changes impacting the identityinvestment managers. Such Directives are progressing at various stages, and are being or the organizational structure of regulators with supervisory authority over Invesco.
     Certain proposalswill or would requirebe implemented by national legislation in member states. As with the Dodd-Frank Act, Invesco does not believe implementation of these Directives will fundamentally change our industry or international treaties.cause us to reconsider our fundamental strategy, but it does appear certain provisions will, and other provisions may, increase regulatory burdens and compliance costs. Similar developments are being implemented or considered in other jurisdictions where we do business; such developments could have similar effects.
     Potential developments under enacted and proposed legal and regulatory changes, and related matters, include:
Expanded prudential regulation over investment management firms.
New or increased capital requirements and related regulation (including new capital requirements pertaining to money market funds).
Additional change to the regulation of money market funds in the U.S. The SEC has adopted changes to Rule 2a-7, the primary securities regulation governing U.S. registered money market funds. These new rules are designed to significantly strengthen the regulatory requirements governing money market funds, increase the resilience of such funds to economic stresses, and reduce the risk of runs on these funds. Regulators in the U.S. continue to evaluate whether to propose mandating a variable (“floating”) NAV for money market funds. Invesco believes such a change would have significant adverse consequences on the money market funds industry and the short-term credit markets, and is encouraged by the recognition of these concerns in the Report of the President’s Working Group on Financial Markets on Money Market Fund Reform Options issued October 21, 2010.
Changes to the distribution of investment funds and other investment products. In the U.S., the SEC has proposed significant changes to Rule 12b-1. Invesco believes these proposals would increase operational and compliance costs. The U.K. Financial Services Authority continues to develop its Retail Distribution Review, which is expected to reshape the manner in which retail investment funds are sold in the U.K. The EU adopted the Alternative Investment Fund Manager Directive; implementing legislation in member states could, among other elements, impose restrictions on the marketing and sale within the EU of private equity and other alternative investment funds sponsored by non-EU managers. Various regulators have promulgated or are considering other new disclosure and suitability requirements pertaining to the distribution of investment funds and other investment products, including enhanced standards and requirements pertaining to disclosures made to retail investors at the point of sale.
Guidelines regarding the structure and components of compensation, including under the Dodd-Frank Act and various EU Directives.
Additional resourcing for regulatory examinations and inspections, including enforcement reviews, and a more aggressive posture regarding commencing enforcement proceedings.
Changes impacting certain other products or markets (e.g., retirement savings).
Enhanced licensing and qualification requirements for key personnel.

13


Other additional rules and regulations and disclosure requirements. Certain provisions impose additional disclosure burdens on public companies, including Invesco. Certain proposals could impose requirements for more widespread disclosures of compensation to highly-paid individuals. Depending upon the scope of any such requirements, Invesco could be disadvantaged in retaining key employees vis-à-vis private companies, including hedge fund sponsors.
Strengthening standards regarding various ethical matters, including enhanced focus of U.S. regulators and law enforcement agencies on compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the enactment of the U.K. Bribery Act.
Other changes impacting the identity or the organizational structure of regulators with supervisory authority over Invesco.
     Invesco cannot at this time predict the full impact of potential legal and regulatory changes on its business. It is possible such changes could impose material new compliance costs or capital requirements or impact Invesco in other ways that could have a material adverse impact on Invesco’s results of operations, financial condition or liquidity. Moreover, suchcertain legal or regulatory changes could require us to modify our strategies, businesses or operations, and we may incur other new constraints or costs in order to satisfy new regulatory requirements or to compete in a changed business environment.
     To the extent that existing or future regulations affecting the sale of our products and services or our investment strategies cause or contribute to reduced sales or increased redemptions of our products or impair the investment performance of our products, our aggregate assets under management and revenuesresults of operations might be adversely affected.
Civil litigation and governmental enforcement actions and investigations could adversely affect our assets under management and future financial results, and increase our costs of doing business.
     Invesco and certain related entities have in recent years been subject to various legal proceedings arising from normal business operations and/or matters that have been the subject of previous regulatory actions. See Part I, Item 3, “Legal Proceedings,” for additional information.
     The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to reach a decision in the case ofJones v. Harrisduring its current term, which is scheduled to end in June 2010. That case involves the interpretation of Section 36(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. Section 36(b) grants private parties the right to sue to challenge fees paid by mutual funds to their investment advisers. Depending on the nature and scope of the Court’s ruling, the mutual fund industry in the U.S. could face additional litigation defense costs, new compliance costs and additional pressure on mutual fund fees.

14


Our investment management professionals and other key employees are a vital part of our ability to attract and retain clients, and the loss of key individuals or a significant portion of those professionals could result in a reduction of our revenues and profitability.
     Retaining highly skilled technical and management personnel is important to our ability to attract and retain clients and retail shareholder accounts. The market for investment management professionals is competitive and has grown more so in recent periods as the investment management industry has experienced growth. The market for investment managers is also increasingly characterized by the movement of investment managers among different firms. Our policy has been to provide our investment management professionals with a supportive professional working environment and compensation and benefits that we believe are competitive with other leading investment management firms. However, we may not be successful in retaining our key personnel, and the loss of key individuals or significant investment management personnel could reduce the attractiveness of our products to potential and current clients and could, therefore, adversely affect our revenues and profitability.
If our reputation is harmed, we could suffer losses in our business, revenues and net income.
     Our business depends on earning and maintaining the trust and confidence of clients, regulators and other market participants, and the resultingour good reputation is critical to our business. Our reputation is vulnerable to many threats that can be difficult or impossible to control, and costly or impossible to remediate. Regulatory inquiries, material errors in public reports, employee dishonesty or other misconduct and rumors, among other things, can substantially damage our reputation, even if they are baseless or satisfactorily addressed. Further, our business requires us to continuously manage actual and potential conflicts of interest, including situations where our services to a particular client conflict, or are perceived to conflict, with the interests of another client.client or those of Invesco. We have procedures and controls that are designed to address and manage conflicts of interest, but this task iscan be complex and difficult, and our reputation could be damaged, and the willingness of clients to enter into transactions in which such a conflict might arise may be affected, if we fail — or appear to fail — to deal appropriately with conflicts of interest. In addition, potential or perceived conflicts could give rise to litigation or regulatory enforcement actions. Any damage to our reputation could impede our ability to attract and retain clients and key personnel, and lead to a reduction in the amount of our assets under management, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and net income.

14


Failure to comply with client contractual requirements and/or guidelines could result in damage awards against us and loss of revenues due to client terminations.
     Many of the assetinvestment management agreements under which we manage assets or provide products or services specify guidelines or contractual requirements that Invesco is required to observe in the provision of its services. A failure to comply with these guidelines or contractual requirements could result in damage to our reputation or in our clients seeking to recover losses, withdrawing their assets or terminating their contracts, any of which could cause our revenues and net income to decline. We maintain various compliance procedures and other controls to prevent, detect and correct such errors. When an error is detected, we typically will make a payment into the applicable client account to correct it. Significant errors could impact our results of operations.
     Competitive pressures may force us to reduce the fees we charge to clients, increase commissions paid to our financial intermediaries or provide more support to those intermediaries, all of which could reduce our profitability.
     The investment management business is highly competitive, and we compete based on a variety of factors, including investment performance, the range of products offered, brand recognition, business reputation, financial strength, stability and continuity of client and intermediary relationships, quality of service, level of fees charged for services and the level of compensation paid and distribution support offered to financial intermediaries. We continue to face market pressures regarding fee levels in certain products.
     We face strong competition in every market in which we operate. Our competitors include a large number of investment management firms, commercial banks, investment banks, broker-dealers, hedge funds, insurance companies and other financial institutions. Some of these institutions have greater capital and other resources, and offer more comprehensive lines of products and services, than we do. Our competitors seek to expand their market share in many of the products and services we offer. If these competitors are successful, our revenues and profitability could be adversely affected. In addition, there are relatively few barriers to entry by new investment management firms, and the successful efforts of new entrants into our various distribution channels around the world have also resulted in increased competition.
     In 2009, we sawrecent years there have been several instances of industry consolidation, both in the area of distributors and manufacturers of investment products. Further consolidation may occur in these areas in the future, particularly if the economic environment and the financial markets remain uncertain and volatile.future. The increasing size and market influence of certain distributors of our products and of certain

15


direct competitors may have a negative impact on our ability to compete at the same levels of profitability in the future, should we find ourselves unable to maintain relevance in the markets in which we compete.
We may engage in strategic transactions that could create risks.
     As part of our business strategy, we regularly review, and from time to time have discussions with respect to, potential strategic transactions, including potential acquisitions, dispositions, consolidations, joint ventures or similar transactions, some of which may be material. There can be no assurance that we will find suitable candidates for strategic transactions at acceptable prices, have sufficient capital resources to pursue such transactions, be successful in negotiating the required agreements, or successfully close transactions after signing such agreements.
     On October 19, 2009, we announced that the company had entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Morgan Stanley’s retail asset management business, including Van Kampen Investments. The transaction was valued at $1.5 billion (subject to adjustment), consisting of payments by Invesco of $500.0 million in cash, for which we expect to use available cash balances and borrowings under our credit facility, and an aggregate of approximately 44.1 million Invesco common shares and non-voting common equivalent preferred shares, which will result in Morgan Stanley obtaining an approximately 9.3% equity interest in our company. The transaction has been approved by the boards of directors of both companies and is expected to close in mid-2010, subject to customary regulatory, client and fund shareholder approvals. As a result of this transaction, and until the time of the deal closing, contractual limitations are in place with respect to our issuing or repurchasing our common shares (other than those related to employee compensation plans), and we are also unable to declare or pay any extraordinary dividends.
     The aggregate amount of approximately 44.1 million Invesco common shares and non-voting common equivalent preferred shares (with economic rights identical to common stock, other than no right to vote such shares,) that we expect to issue to Morgan Stanley in exchange for their asset management business upon closing the transaction are largely unrestricted. Since no “lock up” exists, Morgan Stanley may sell these shares in the open market or through a secondary offering subject to certain limited restrictions. If Morgan Stanley were to sell their future equity stake in Invesco, or express an intention to sell the stake, after the close, this may have a significant impact on the company’s stock price.
Acquisitions including the pending acquisition of Morgan Stanley’s retail asset management business, also pose the risk that any business we acquire may lose customers or employees or could underperform relative to expectations. We could also experience financial or other setbacks if pending transactions encounter unanticipated problems, including problems related to closing or integration. Following the completion of an acquisition, we may have to rely on the seller to provide administrative and other support, including financial reporting and internal controls, to the acquired business for a period of time. There can be no assurance that such sellers will do so in a manner that is acceptable to us.
Our ability to access the capital markets in a timely manner should we seek to do so depends on a number of factors.
     Our access to the capital markets, including for purposes of financing potential acquisitions, depends significantly on our credit ratings. We have received credit ratings of A3A3/Stable and BBB+A-/Stable from Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s credit rating agencies, respectively, as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Standard & Poor’s has a “positive” outlook forAccording to Moody’s, obligations rated ‘A’ are considered upper medium grade and are subject to low credit risk. Invesco’s rating of A3 is at the rating, and Moody’s has a “stable” outlook for the rating aslow end of the dateA range (A1, A2, A3), but three notches above the lowest investment grade rating of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Baa3. Standard and Poor’s rating of A- is at the lower end of the A rating, with BBB- representing Standard and Poor’s lowest investment grade rating. According to Standard and Poor’s, A obligations exhibit a strong capacity to meet financial commitments, but are somewhat susceptible to adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances. We believe that rating agency concerns include but are not limited to: our abilityrevenues are somewhat exposed to sustain net positive asset flows across customer channels, product type and geographies, our level of indebtedness, our risk appetite and approachequity market volatility, negative tangible equity, potential impact from regulatory changes to risk management, our ability to maintain consistent positive investment, the profitability of our business under a sustained downturn scenario,industry, and integration risk related to the pending acquisition of Morgan Stanley’s retail asset management business. Additionally, the rating agencies could decide to downgrade the entire assetinvestment management industry, based on their perspective of future growth and solvency. Material deterioration of these

15


factors, and others defined by each rating agency, could result in downgrades to our credit rating or outlook,ratings, thereby limiting our ability to generate additional financing or receive mandates.financing. Our credit facility borrowing rates are tied to our credit ratings. Management believes that solid investment grade ratings are an important factor in winning and maintaining institutional business and strives to manage the company to maintain such ratings.
     A reduction in our long- or short-term credit ratings could increase our borrowing costs, limit our access to the capital markets, and may result in outflows thereby reducing AUM and revenues. The continuing current levels of unprecedentedContinued volatility in global finance markets may also affect our ability to access the capital markets should we seek to do so. If we are unable to access capital markets in a timely manner, our business could be adversely affected.

16


Our indebtedness could adversely affect our financial position.
     As of December 31, 2009,2010, we had outstanding total debt of $745.7$1,315.7 million and shareholders’total equity attributable to common shareholders of $6,912.9 million.$7,769.1 million, excluding retained earnings appropriated for investors in consolidated investment products. The amount of indebtedness we carry could limit our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service requirements or other purposes, increase our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions, limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business or industry, and place us at a disadvantage in relation to our competitors. Any or all of the above factors could materially adversely affect our financial position.position or results of operations.
Our credit facility imposes restrictions on our ability to conduct business and, if amounts borrowed under it were subject to accelerated repayment, we might not have sufficient assets to repay such amounts in full.
     Our credit facility requires us to maintain specified financial ratios, including maximum debt-to-earnings and minimum interest coverage ratios, as well as maintaining a minimum amount of long-term assets under management.ratios. This credit facility also contains customary affirmative operating covenants and negative covenants that, among other things, restrict certain of our subsidiaries’ ability to incur debt and restrict our ability to transfer assets, merge, make loans and other investments and create liens. The breach of any covenant (either due to our actions or due to a significant and prolonged market-driven decline in our long-term assets under management or our operating results) would result in a default under the credit facility. In the event of any such default, lenders that are party to the credit facility could refuse to make further extensions of credit to us and require all amounts borrowed under the credit facility, together with accrued interest and other fees, to be immediately due and payable. If any indebtedness under the credit facility were subject to accelerated repayment, we might not have sufficient liquid assets to repay such indebtedness in full.
Changes in the distribution channels on which we depend could reduce our revenues and hinder our growth.
     We sell a significant portion of our investment products through a variety of financial intermediaries, including major wire houses, regional broker-dealers, banks and financial planners in North America, and independent brokers and financial advisors, banks and financial organizations in Europe and Asia. Increasing competition for these distribution channels could cause our distribution costs to rise, which would lower our net revenues. As a result of recent market turmoil,Following the financial crisis, there has been some consolidation of banks and broker-dealers, particularly in the U.S., and a limited amount of migration of brokers and financial advisors away from major banks to independent firms focused largely on providing advice. If these trends continue, our distribution costs could increase as a percentage of our revenues generated. Additionally, particularly outside of the U.S., certain of the intermediaries upon whom we rely to distribute our investment products also sell their own competing proprietary funds and investment products, which could limit the distribution of our products. Increasingly, investors, particularly in the institutional market, rely on external consultants and other unconflicted third parties for advice on the choice of investment manager. These consultants and third parties tend to exert a significant degree of influence and they may favor a competitor of Invesco as better meeting their particular client’s needs. There is no assurance that our investment products will be among their recommended choices in the future. Additionally, ifIf one of our major distributors were to cease operations, it could have a significant adverse effect on our revenues and profitability. Moreover, anyAny failure to maintain strong business relationships with these distribution sources and the consultant community would impair our ability to sell our products, which in turn could have a negative effect on our revenues and profitability.
We could be subject to losses if we fail to properly safeguard confidential and sensitive information.
     We maintain and transmit confidential information about our clients as well as proprietary information relating to our business operations as part of our regular operations. Our systems could be attacked by unauthorized users or corrupted by computer viruses or other malicious software code, or authorized persons could inadvertently or intentionally release confidential or proprietary information.

16


     Such disclosure could, among other things, damage our reputation, allow competitors to access our proprietary business information, result in liability for failure to safeguard our clients’ data, result in the termination of contracts by our existing customers, subject us to regulatory action, or require material capital and operating expenditures to investigate and remediate the breach.
Our business is vulnerable to deficiencies and failures in support systems and customer service functions that could lead to breaches and errors, resulting in loss of customers or claims against us or our subsidiaries.
     The ability to consistently and reliably obtain accurate securities pricing information, process client portfolio and fund shareholder transactions and provide reports and other customer service to fund shareholders and investorsclients in other accounts managed by us is essential to our continuing success. In recent periods, illiquid markets for certain types of securities have required increased use of fair

17


value pricing, which is dependent on certain subjective judgments.judgments that have the potential to be challenged. Any delays or inaccuracies in obtaining pricing information, processing such transactions or such reports, other breaches and errors, and any inadequacies in other customer service, could result in reimbursement obligations or other liabilities, or alienate customers and potentially give rise to claims against us. Our customer service capability, as well as our ability to obtain prompt and accurate securities pricing information and to process transactions and reports, is highly dependent on communications and information systems and on third-party vendors. These systems or vendors could suffer deficiencies, failures or interruptions due to various natural or man-made causes, and our back-up procedures and capabilities may not be adequate to avoid extended interruptions in operations. Certain of these processes involve a degree of manual input, and thus similar problems could occur from time to time due to human error.
If we are unable to successfully recover from a disaster or other business continuity problem, we could suffer material financial loss, loss of human capital, regulatory actions, reputational harm or legal liability.
     If we were to experience a local or regional disaster or other business continuity problem, such as a pandemic or other natural or man-made disaster, our continued success will depend, in part, on the availability of our personnel, our office facilities and the proper functioning of our computer, telecommunication and other related systems and operations. In such an event, our operational size, the multiple locations from which we operate, and our existing back-up systems would provide us with an important advantage. Nevertheless, we could still experience near-term operational challenges with regard to particular areas of our operations, such as key executive officers or technology personnel. Further, as we strive to achieve cost savings by shifting certain business processes to lower-cost geographic locations such as India, the potential for particular types of natural or man-made disasters, political, economic or infrastructure instabilities, or other country- or region-specific business continuity risks increases. Although we seek to regularly assess and improve our existing business continuity plans, a major disaster, or one that affected certain important operating areas, or our inability to successfully recover should we experience a disaster or other business continuity problem, could materially interrupt our business operations and cause material financial loss, loss of human capital, regulatory actions, reputational harm or legal liability.
Since many of our subsidiary operations are located outside of the United States and have functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar, changes in the exchange rates to the U.S. dollar affect our reported financial results from one period to the next.
     The largest component of our net assets, revenues and expenses, as well as our assets under management, is presently derived from the United States. However, we have a large number of subsidiaries outside of the United States whose functional currencies are not the U.S. dollar. As a result, fluctuations in the exchange rates to the U.S. dollar affect our reported financial results from one period to the next. We do not actively manage our exposure to such effects. Consequently, significant strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to the U.K. Pound Sterling, Euro, or Canadian dollar, among other currencies, could have a material negative impact on our reported financial results.
The carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets on our balance sheet could become impaired, which would adversely affect our results of operations.
     We have goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets on our balance sheet that isare subject to an annual impairment review.reviews. Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets totaled $6,467.6$6,980.2 million and $1,161.7 million, respectively, at December 31, 2009 (2008: $5,966.8 million)2010 (2009: $6,467.6 million and $110.6 million, respectively). We may not realize the value of such goodwill.assets. We perform impairment reviews of the book values of goodwillthese assets on an annual basis or more frequently if impairment indicators are present. A variety of factors could cause such book values to become impaired. Should valuations be deemed to be impaired, a write-down of the related assets would occur, adversely affecting our results of operations for the period. See Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies — Goodwill” and “— Intangibles” for additional details of the company’s goodwill impairment analysis process.
Implementation of new accounting rules in our Consolidated Financial Statements could result in investor confusion or potential deficiencies in internal controls over financial reporting.
     In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)” (FASB Statement No. 167), now encompassed in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 810, “Consolidation.” FASB Statement No. 167 is effective January 1, 2010, and its adoption will be reflected in our first quarter 2010 Form 10-Q. The adoption of FASB Statement No. 167 will have a significant impact on the presentation of our financial statements, as it will require us to consolidate, for the first time, certain collateralized loan and debt obligation products (CLOs) with approximately $6 billion in AUM at December 31, 2009, into our financial statements. As a result, the company’s Consolidated Statement of Income will reflect the elimination of management and performance fees earned from these CLOs. In addition, FASB Statement No. 167 will require that our Consolidated Balance Sheet reflect the collateral assets held and non-recourse debt issued by these CLOs, despite the fact that the

1817


assets cannot be used by the company, nor is the company obligated for the debt. In addition, the new rules will require our Consolidated Cash Flow Statement to reflect the cash flows of the CLOs. The adoption of FASB Statement No. 167 in the company’s financial statements could have an impact on users’ analyses of our underlying results of operations, financial position, or liquidity. As a result, external credit rating agencies or analysts could report information not reflective of the underlying financial condition of the company.
     Deficiencies in internal controls over financial reporting could result, as the financial information of the funds required to be consolidated do not form part of the company’s financial reporting systems and processes.
Bermuda law differs from the laws in effect in the United States and may afford less protection to shareholders.
     Our shareholders may have more difficulty protecting their interests than shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a jurisdiction of the United States. As a Bermuda company, we are governed by the Companies Act 1981 of Bermuda (“Companies Act”). The Companies Act differs in some material respects from laws generally applicable to United States corporations and shareholders, including provisions relating to interested directors, mergers, amalgamations and acquisitions, takeovers, shareholder lawsuits and indemnification of directors.
     Under Bermuda law, the duties of directors and officers of a company are generally owed to the company only. Shareholders of Bermuda companies do not generally have rights to take action against directors or officers of the company, and may only do so in limited circumstances. Directors and officers may owe duties to a company’s creditors in cases of impending insolvency. Directors and officers of a Bermuda company must, in exercising their powers and performing their duties, act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the company and must exercise the care and skill that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in comparable circumstances. Directors have a duty not to put themselves in a position in which their duties to the company and their personal interests may conflict and also are under a duty to disclose any personal interest in any material contract or proposed material contract with the company or any of its subsidiaries. If a director or officer of a Bermuda company is found to have breached his duties to that company, he may be held personally liable to the company in respect of that breach of duty.
     Our Bye-Laws provide for indemnification of our directors and officers in respect of any loss arising or liability attaching to them in respect of any negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust of which a director or officer may be guilty in relation to us other than in respect of his own fraud or dishonesty, which is the maximum extent of indemnification permitted under the Companies Act. Under our Bye-Laws, each of our shareholders agrees to waive any claim or right of action, both individually and on our behalf, other than those involving fraud or dishonesty, against us or any of our officers, directors or employees. The waiver applies to any action taken by a director, officer or employee, or the failure of such person to take any action, in the performance of his duties, except with respect to any matter involving any fraud or dishonesty on the part of the director, officer or employee. This waiver limits the right of shareholders to assert claims against our directors, officers and employees unless the act or failure to act involves fraud or dishonesty.
Legislative and other measures that may be taken by U.S. and/or other governmental authorities could materially increase our tax burden or otherwise adversely affect our financial conditions, results of operations or cash flows.
     Under current laws, as the company is domiciled and tax resident in Bermuda, taxation in other jurisdictions is dependent upon the types and the extent of the activities of the company undertaken in those jurisdictions. There is a risk that changes in either the types of activities undertaken by the company or changes in tax rules relating to tax residency could subject the company and its shareholders to additional taxation.
     We continue to assess the impact of various U.S. federal and state legislative proposals, and modifications to existing tax treaties between the United States and foreign countries, that could result in a material increase in our U.S. federal and state taxes. Proposals have been introduced in the U.S. Congress that, if ultimately enacted, could either limit treaty benefits on certain payments made by our U.S. subsidiaries to non-U.S. affiliates, treat the company as a U.S. corporation and thereby subject the earnings from non-U.S. subsidiaries of the company to U.S. taxation, or both. We cannot predict the outcome of any specific legislative proposals. However, if such proposals were to be enacted, or if modifications were to be made to certain existing tax treaties, the consequences could have a materially adverse impact on the company, including increasing our tax burden, increasing costs of our tax compliance or otherwise adversely affecting our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

19


Examinations and audits by tax authorities could result in additional tax payments for prior periods.
     The company and its subsidiaries’ income tax returns periodically are examined by various tax authorities. The calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations in a multitude of jurisdictions across our global operations. We recognize potential liabilities and record tax liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues based on our estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional income taxes will be due. We adjust these liabilities in light of changing facts and circumstances. Due to the complexity of some of these uncertainties, however, the ultimate resolution may result in a payment that is materially different from our current estimate of the tax liabilities.
We have anti-takeover provisions in our Bye-Laws that may discourage a change of control.
     Our Bye-Laws contain provisions that could make it more difficult for a third-party to acquire us or to obtain majority representation on our board of directors without the consent of our board. As a result, shareholders may be limited in their ability to obtain a premium for their shares under such circumstances.

18


Item 1B.Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments
     N/A
Item 2.Properties
     Our registered office is located in Hamilton, Bermuda, and our principal executive offices are in leased office space at 1555 Peachtree Street N.E., Suite 1800, Atlanta, Georgia, 30309, U.S.A. We own office facilities at Perpetual Park, Henley-on-Thames, Oxfordshire, RG9 1HH, United Kingdom, and at 301 W. Roosevelt, Wheaton, Illinois, 60187, and we lease our additional principal offices located at 30 Finsbury Square, London, EC2A 1AG, United Kingdom; 11 Greenway Plaza, Houston, Texas 77046; 1166 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10036; and in Canada at 5140 Yonge Street, Toronto, Ontario M2N 6X7. We lease office space in 17
     Our registered office is located in Hamilton, Bermuda, and our principal executive offices are in leased office space at 1555 Peachtree Street N.E., Suite 1800, Atlanta, Georgia, 30309, U.S.A. We own office facilities at Perpetual Park, Henley-on-Thames, Oxfordshire, RG9 1HH, United Kingdom, and at 301 W. Roosevelt, Wheaton, Illinois, 60187, and we lease our additional principal offices located at 30 Finsbury Square, London, EC2A 1AG, United Kingdom; 11 Greenway Plaza, Houston, Texas 77046; 1166 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10036; 17W110 22nd Street, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181, and in Canada at 5140 Yonge Street, Toronto, Ontario M2N 6X7. We lease office space in 18 other countries.
Item 3.Legal Proceedings
     Following the industry-wide regulatory investigations in 2003 and 2004, multiple lawsuits based on market timing allegations were filed against various parties affiliated with Invesco. These lawsuits were consolidated in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, together with market timing lawsuits brought against affiliates of other mutual fund companies, and on September 29, 2004, three amended complaints were filed against company-affiliated parties: (1) a putative shareholder class action complaint brought on behalf of shareholders of AIM funds formerly advised by Invesco Funds Group, Inc.; (2) a derivative complaint purportedly brought on behalf of certain AIM funds and the shareholders of such funds; and (3) an ERISA complaint purportedly brought on behalf of participants in the company’s 401(k) plan. The company and plaintiffs have reached settlements in principle of these lawsuits. The proposed settlements, which are subject to court approval, call for a payment by the company of $9.8 million, recorded in general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Income in 2007, in exchange for dismissal with prejudice of all pending claims. In addition, under the terms of the proposed settlements, the company may incur certain costs in connection with providing notice of the proposed settlements to affected shareholders. Based on information currently available, it is not believed that any such incremental notice costs will have any material effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the company.
     The asset
     In July 2010, various closed-end funds formerly advised by Van Kampen Investments or Morgan Stanley Investment Management included in the acquired business had complaints filed against them in New York State Court commencing derivative lawsuits purportedly brought on behalf of the common shareholders of those funds. The funds are nominal defendants in these derivative lawsuits and the defendants also include Van Kampen Investments (acquired by Invesco on June 1, 2010), Morgan Stanley Investment Management and certain officers and trustees of the funds who are or were employees of those firms. Invesco has certain obligations under the applicable acquisition agreement regarding the defense costs and any damages associated with this litigation. The plaintiffs allege breaches of fiduciary duties owed by the non-fund defendants to the funds’ common shareholders related to the funds’ redemption in prior periods of Auction Rate Preferred Securities (“ARPS”) theretofore issued by the funds. The complaints are similar to other complaints recently filed against investment advisers, officers and trustees of closed-end funds in other fund complexes which issued and redeemed ARPS. The complaints allege that the advisers, distributors and certain officers and trustees of those funds breached their fiduciary duty by redeeming ARPS at their liquidation value when there was no obligation to do so and when the value of ARPS in the secondary marketplace were significantly below their liquidation value. The complaints also allege that the ARPS redemptions were principally motivated by the fund sponsors’ interests to preserve distribution relationships with brokers and other financial intermediaries who held ARPS after having repurchased them from their own clients. Certain other funds included in the acquired business have received demand letters expressing similar allegations. Such demand letters could be precursors to additional similar lawsuits being commenced against those other funds. The Boards of Trustees of the funds are evaluating the complaints and demand letters and have established special committees of independent trustees to conduct an inquiry regarding the allegations. Invesco believes the cases should be dismissed following completion of such review period, although there can be no assurance of that result. Invesco intends to defend vigorously any cases which may survive beyond initial motions to dismiss.
     The investment management industry also is subject to extensive levels of ongoing regulatory oversight and examination. In the United States and other jurisdictions in which the company operates, governmental authorities regularly make inquiries, hold investigations and administer market conduct examinations with respect to compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Additional lawsuits or regulatory enforcement actions arising out of these inquiries may in the future be filed against the company and related entities and individuals in the U.S. and other jurisdictions in which the company and its affiliates operate. Any material loss of investor and/or client confidence as a result of such inquiries and/or litigation could result in a significant decline in assets under management, which would have an adverse effect on the company’s future financial results and its ability to grow its business.
     In the normal course of its business, the company is subject to various litigation matters. Although there can be no assurances, at this time management believes, based on information currently available to it, that it is not probable that the ultimate outcome of any of these actions will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition or results of operations of the company.
Item 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
     None.

20

     None.

19


PART II
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
     Invesco Ltd. is organized under the laws of Bermuda, and our common shares are listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “IVZ.” At January 31, 2011, there were approximately 6,777 holders of record of our common shares.
     The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low reported share prices on the New York Stock Exchange, based on data reported by Bloomberg.
             
  Invesco Ltd.
  Common Shares
          Dividends
  High Low Declared*
2010
            
Fourth Quarter $24.24  $21.06  $0.1100 
Third Quarter $21.90  $16.63  $0.1100 
Second Quarter $23.66  $16.83  $0.1100 
First Quarter $23.63  $18.32  $0.1025 
2009
            
Fourth Quarter $23.97  $20.04  $0.1025 
Third Quarter $23.00  $15.72  $0.1025 
Second Quarter $18.73  $13.60  $0.1025 
First Quarter $15.00  $9.51  $0.1000 
*Dividends declared represent amounts declared in the current quarter but are attributable to the prior fiscal quarter.
     The following graph illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return of our common shares (ordinary shares prior to December 4, 2007) over the five-year period ending December 31, 2010, and compares it to the cumulative total return of the Standard and Poor’s (S&P) 500 Index and to a group of peer investment management companies. This table is not intended to forecast future performance of our common shares.
     Invesco Ltd.
Note:The above chart is organized under the laws of Bermuda, and our common shares are listed and traded onaverage annual total return for the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “IVZ.” At Januaryperiod from December 31, 2010, there were approximately 7,227 holders of record of our common shares.
     Prior to2005 through December 4, 2007, we had outstanding ordinary shares that were listed on the Official List of The U.K. Listing Authority and were traded on the London Stock Exchange. We also had American Depositary Shares (ADSs) listed for trading on the NYSE, also under the symbol “IVZ.” Each ADS represented the right to receive two ordinary shares. We also had exchangeable shares, which were issued by one of our subsidiaries and were listed for trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange. Each exchangeable share represented the right to receive one ordinary share.
     On December 4, 2007, we redomiciled the company from the United Kingdom to Bermuda in a transaction previously approved by shareholders. To accomplish this, our predecessor company, INVESCO PLC, effected a court-approved U.K. scheme of arrangement under which our shareholders received common shares in31, 2010. Asset Manager Index includes Affiliated Managers Group, Alliance Bernstein, BlackRock, Eaton Vance, Federated Investors, Franklin Resources, Gamco Investors, Invesco Ltd., the new Bermuda parent company, in exchange for their ordinary shares in INVESCO PLC. Holders of our ADSsJanus, Legg Mason, Schroders Plc, T. Rowe Price, and our exchangeable shares also received common shares in the new Bermuda parent company in exchange for their holdings. Following the redomicile, Invesco Ltd. effected a one-for-two reverse stock split, such that all of our shareholders now hold only common shares, par value $0.20 per share, in Invesco Ltd.
     The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low reported share prices on the New York Stock Exchange, based on data reported by Bloomberg.
             
  Invesco Ltd.
  Common Shares (or equivalent)
  High Low Dividends
Declared*
2009
            
Fourth Quarter $23.97  $20.04  $0.1025 
Third Quarter $23.00  $15.72  $0.1025 
Second Quarter $18.73  $13.60  $0.1025 
First Quarter $15.00  $9.51  $0.10 
2008
            
Fourth Quarter $21.07  $8.84  $0.10 
Third Quarter $27.00  $20.56  $0.10 
Second Quarter $28.80  $22.31  $0.10 
First Quarter $30.66  $21.43  $0.22 
Waddell & Reed.
*Dividends declared represent amounts declared in the current quarter but are attributable to the prior fiscal quarter, with the exception of the $0.22 per share dividend declared in the first quarter of 2008. This dividend was attributable to the second half of 2007 and was declared when the company formerly declared semi-annual dividends prior to its redomicile discussed above.

21


     The following graph illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return of our common shares (ordinary shares prior to December 4, 2007) over the five-year period ending December 31, 2009, and compares it to the cumulative total return on the Standard and Poor’s (S&P) 500 Index and to a group of peer asset management companies. This table is not intended to forecast future performance of our common shares.
     The chart below illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return of our common shares (ordinary shares prior to December 4, 2007) since the company began executing its multi-year strategic plan, which was designed to enhance long-term investment performance, improve and simplify the operating platform, sharpen the focus on clients and strengthen the business for long-term success.

20


Important Information Regarding Dividend Payments
Note:Asset Manager Index includes Affiliated Managers Group, Alliance Bernstein, BlackRock, Eaton Vance, Federated Investors, Franklin Resources, Gamco Investors, Invesco Ltd., Janus, Legg Mason, Schroders, T. Rowe Price, and Waddell & Reed.

22


Important Information Regarding Dividend Payments
     Invesco declares and pays dividends on a quarterly basis in arrears. On October 16, 2009, the company declared a third quarter cash dividend of $0.1025 per Invesco Ltd. common share, which was paid on December 2, 2009, to shareholders of record as of November 18, 2009. On January 27, 2010, the company declared a fourth quarter 2009 cash dividend of $0.1025 per Invesco Ltd. common share, which will be paid on March 10, 2010, to shareholders of record as of February 23,     Invesco declares and pays dividends on a quarterly basis in arrears. On October 25, 2010, the company declared a third quarter cash dividend of $0.11 per Invesco Ltd. common share which was paid on December 8, 2010 to shareholders of record as of November 19, 2010. On January 27, 2011, the company declared a fourth quarter 2010 cash dividend of $0.11 per Invesco Ltd. common share which will be paid on March 9, 2011 to shareholders of record as of February 23, 2011.
     The total dividend attributable to the 2010 fiscal year of $0.44 per share represented a 7.3% increase over the total dividend attributable to the 2009 fiscal year of $0.41 per share represented a 2.5% increase over the total dividend attributable to the 2008 fiscal year of $0.40 per share. The declaration, payment and amount of any future dividends will be determined by our board of directors and will depend upon, among other factors, our earnings, financial condition and capital requirements at the time such declaration and payment are considered. The board has a policy of managing dividends in a prudent fashion, with due consideration given to profit levels, overall debt levels and historical dividend payouts. See also Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources — Dividends,” for additional details regarding dividends.
Repurchases of Equity Securities
     The following table shows share repurchase activity during the three months ended December 31, 2009:2010:
                 
              Maximum Number at end of
          Total Number of period (or Approximate
          Shares Purchased as Dollar Value) of Shares that
          Part of Publicly May Yet Be Purchased
  Total Number of Average Price Announced Plans Under the Plans
Month Shares Purchased(1) Paid Per Share or Programs(2) or Programs(2)
October 1-31, 2009  157,695  $22.97     $1,360,608,682 
November 1-30, 2009  8,720  $21.15     $1,360,608,682 
December 1-31, 2009  7,346  $23.49     $1,360,608,682 
                 
              Maximum Number at end of
          Total Number of period (or Approximate
          Shares Purchased as Dollar Value) of Shares that
          Part of Publicly May Yet Be Purchased
  Total Number of Average Price Announced Plans Under the Plans
Month Shares Purchased(1) Paid Per Share or Programs(2) or Programs(2) (millions)
October 1-31, 2010  160,181  $21.38     $1,232.9 
November 1-30, 2010  2,934,853  $21.99   2,934,853  $1,168.4 
December 1-31, 2010  33  $23.23     $1,168.4 
                 
   3,095,067       2,934,853     
                 
 
(1) An aggregate of 173,761160,214 restricted share awards included in the table above were surrendered to us by Invesco employees to satisfy tax withholding obligations or loan repayments in connection with the vesting of equity awards.
 
(2) On April 23, 2008, our board of directors authorized a new share repurchase authorization of up to $1.5 billion of our common shares with no stated expiration date.

2321


Item 6.
Item 6.Selected Financial Data
     The following tables present selected consolidated financial information for the company as of and for each of the five fiscal years in the period ended December 31, 2009. The2010. Except as otherwise noted below, the consolidated financial information has been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
                                        
 As of and For The Years Ended December 31, As of and For The Years Ended December 31,
$ in millions, except per share and other data 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
Operating Data:
  
Operating revenues 2,627.3 3,307.6 3,878.9 3,246.7 2,872.6  3,487.7 2,627.3 3,307.6 3,878.9 3,246.7 
Net revenues* 1,978.7 2,489.4 2,888.4 2,428.0 2,166.6 
Net revenues(1)
 2,602.2 1,984.6 2,490.2 2,881.9 2,412.8 
Operating income 484.3 747.8 994.3 759.2 407.9  589.9 484.3 747.8 994.3 759.2 
Net operating income* 512.7 787.5 1,039.8 762.1 407.9 
Adjusted operating income(2)
 897.7 565.6 826.1 1,078.6 766.2 
Operating margin  18.4%  22.6%  25.6%  23.4%  14.2%  16.9%  18.4%  22.6%  25.6%  23.4%
Net operating margin*  25.9%  31.6%  36.0%  31.4%  18.8%
Net income/(loss) attributable to common shareholders 322.5 481.7 673.6 482.7 219.8 
Adjusted operating margin(2)
  34.5%  28.5%  33.2%  37.4%  31.8%
Net income attributable to common shareholders 465.7 322.5 481.7 673.6 482.7 
Adjusted net income(3)
 639.7 378.1 527.1 718.2 499.7 
Per Share Data:
  
Earnings per share:  
-basic 0.77 1.24 1.68 1.22 0.55  1.01 0.77 1.24 1.68 1.22 
-diluted 0.76 1.21 1.64 1.19 0.54  1.01 0.76 1.21 1.64 1.19 
Adjusted EPS(3)
 1.38 0.89 1.32 1.74 1.23 
Dividends declared per share 0.4075 0.520 0.372 0.357 0.330  0.4325 0.4075 0.5200 0.3720 0.3570 
Balance Sheet Data:
  
Total assets 10,909.6 9,756.9 12,925.2 12,228.5 10,702.7  20,444.1 10,909.6 9,756.9 12,925.2 12,228.5 
Total debt 745.7 1,159.2 1,276.4 1,279.0 1,220.0 
Long-term debt 1,315.7 745.7 1,159.2 1,276.4 1,279.0 
Long-term debt of consolidated investment products 5,865.4   116.6 37.0 
Total equity attributable to common shareholders 6,912.9 5,689.5 6,590.6 6,164.0 5,529.8  8,264.6 6,912.9 5,689.5 6,590.6 6,164.0 
Total equity 7,620.8 6,596.2 7,711.8 7,668.6 6,730.6  9,360.9 7,620.8 6,596.2 7,711.8 7,668.6 
Other Data:
  
Ending AUM (in billions) $423.1 $357.2 $500.1 $462.6 $386.3  $616.5 $459.5 $377.1 $529.3 $482.0 
Average AUM (in billions) $388.7 $440.6 $489.1 $424.2 $377.6  $532.3 $415.8 $468.9 $511.7 $430.7 
Headcount 4,890 5,325 5,475 5,574 5,798  5,617 4,890 5,325 5,475 5,574 
 
*(1) Net revenues are operating revenues less third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses, plus our proportional share of the net revenues net of third-party distribution expenses, fromour joint venture investments. Net operating margin is equal to net operating income dividedinvestments, plus management fees earned from, less other revenue recorded by, net revenues. Net operating income is operating income plus our proportional share of the net operating income from joint venture investments.consolidated investment products. See Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for reconciliationsthe reconciliation of operating revenues to net revenuesrevenues.
(2)Adjusted operating margin is adjusted operating income divided by net revenues. Adjusted operating income includes operating income plus our proportional share of the operating income of our joint venture investments, transaction and fromintegration charges, amortization of acquisition-related prepaid compensation and other intangibles, compensation expense related to market valuation changes in deferred compensation plans, the operating income impact of the consolidation of investment products, and other reconciling items. See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for the reconciliation of operating income to netadjusted operating income.
(3)Adjusted net income is net income attributable to common shareholders adjusted to add back transaction and integration charges, amortization of acquisition-related prepaid compensation and other intangibles, and the tax cash flow benefits resulting from tax amortization of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. Adjusted net income excludes the net income of consolidated investment products, and the net income impact of deferred compensation plans and other reconciling items. By calculation, adjusted EPS is adjusted net income divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (for diluted EPS). See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for the reconciliation of net income to adjusted net income.

2422


Item 7.
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Executive Overview
     The following executive overview summarizes the significant trends affecting our results of operations and financial condition for the periods presented. This overview and the remainder of this management’s discussion and analysis supplements, and should be read in conjunction with, the Consolidated Financial Statements of Invesco Ltd. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “company” or “Invesco”) and the notes thereto contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
     AlthoughInvesco is a leading independent global investment manager with offices in more than 20 countries. As of December 31, 2010, we managed $616.5 billion in assets for retail, institutional and high-net-worth investors around the world. By delivering the combined power of our distinctive worldwide investment management capabilities, Invesco provides a comprehensive array of enduring solutions for our clients. We have a significant presence in the institutional and retail segments of the investment management industry in North America, UK, Europe and Asia-Pacific, serving clients in more than 150 countries.
     Despite a number of challenges during the year, including the U.S. equity market flash crash in May, the heightened risk of European sovereign default, and continued uncertainty about the strength of the economic recovery, most global equity markets began to recover afterachieved positive returns in 2010 marking the first quartersecond year of 2009, they beganrecovery from the year under extreme pressure,financial crisis as illustrated in the table below. It is important to note that the markets remain below their historical highs, with the S&P down 25.73% from October 2007 to January 2010.chart below:
     In expectation of volatile financial markets, Invesco senior leadership adopted a disciplined approach to our business beginning in 2008. A key component of this approach was to significantly reduce discretionary spending, freeing resources which enabled the company to reinvest in opportunities that would strengthen our business over the long term and enhance our competitive position. This approach served the company well over the past two years — during which the Dow Jones Industrial Average saw its worst year of performance since 1931 (in 2008), and other markets around the globe suffered significant declines as well.
     After bottoming out in March 2009, global financial markets staged a dramatic recovery with several major global market indices rebounding in record fashion off of record declines in 2008.     The response fromto these challenges by governments and central banks around the world of providing additional fiscal and monetary stimulus led to the financial crisis in 2008 was an unprecedented amount of monetary and fiscal stimulus. Central banks lowered interest rates to near zero, issued a number of debt guarantees for banks and other non-bank financial institutions, and began to increase the supply of money through open market asset purchases. Additionally, governments around the globe passed legislationinvestor environment that poured billions of dollars into the global economy. These actions alleviated the risk aversion that dominated the latter half of 2008 andfavored riskier assets as yields on less risky government bonds reached record lows. As a result, financialmost global equity markets ralliedachieved positive returns in 2009.2010 with the S&P 500 climbing almost 13%, the FTSE 100 rising 9%, and the MSCI EAFE index gaining nearly 5%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average climbed 53.8% offexception was the equity market in Japan which declined 3% as the strength in the Japanese Yen, up almost 15% against the U.S. Dollar in 2010, negatively impacted the profits of March lows to finishJapanese exporters and multinational corporations. The table below summarizes the year up 22.6%. The NASDAQ Composite Index rebounded 78.9% above its March low to return 45.2%ended December 31 returns of several major market indices for the full year. The FTSE 100 gained 22.1% in2010, 2009, its largest advance since 1997. The largest returns were found in the emerging markets as the MSCI Emerging Market Index returned 79.0% for the year.and 2008:
     The dramatic easing of monetary policy also contributed to major improvements in the credit markets. As interest rates remained close to zero investors fled the relative safety of U.S. Treasury securities for riskier asset classes, such as investment grade, high yield, and emerging market bonds, in search of yield. Credit spreads tightened to levels not seen since the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers in September 2008 providing corporations around the world access to capital markets. Additionally, the U.S. dollar weakened from March until December as investors redeployed from the relative safety of U.S. Treasury securities into non-U.S. investments.
             
  Year ended December 31,
Index 2010 2009 2008
S&P 500  12.8%  23.5%  (37.0%)
FTSE 100  9.0%  22.1%  (28.0%)
Nikkei 225  (3.0%)  19.0%  (41.1%)
MSCI EAFE  4.9%  27.8%  (45.1%)

2523


     In spiteBoth Treasury markets and corporate credit markets achieved positive returns in 2010 as well. Treasury securities benefited from the combination of the difficult operating environment over“flight to quality” trade in the pastfirst half of the year, coinciding with the U.S. equity market flash crash and increased risk of default by some European governments, as well as the Federal Reserve beginning the second round of quantitative easing, a process whereby the Federal Reserve creates new money to purchase Treasury securities. For the year, 10-year Treasury notes gained 8% while shorter dated 3- and 5-year notes gained 5% and 7% respectively. Corporate credit markets benefited from improved fundamentals as earnings improved and corporations stockpiled cash. Further, the stimulus efforts from central bankers around the globe provided support as yields on government securities reached record lows, and fixed income investors moved out the credit risk curve in search of higher yields. For the year, investment grade credit gained 9.0% while high-yield bonds returned 14.6%.
     Invesco continued to make progress in a number of areas that furtherbetter positioned our company for a time whenas the markets return.continue their measured return to pre-financial crisis levels. Throughout the course of 2009,2010, the company’s financial performance strengthened. In addition, during this period, Invesco continued to strengthen its competitive position with respect to investment performance, maintainmaintained its focus on its clients, and enhanceenhanced its profile in the industry.
     A critical factor in Invesco’s ability to weather the economic storms of the past twothree years was our integrated approach to risk management. Our risk management framework provides the basis for consistent and meaningful risk dialogue up, down and across the company. Our Global Performance Measurement and Risk group provides senior management and the Board with insight into core investment risks, while our Corporate Risk Management Committee facilitates a focus on strategic, operational and all other business risks. Further, a network of business unit,component, functional, and geographic risk management committees maintainsmaintain an ongoing risk assessment process that provides a bottom-up perspective on the specific risk areas existing in various domains of our business. Through this regular and consistent risk communication, the Board has reasonable assurance that all material risks of the company are being addressed and that the company is propagating a risk-aware culture in which goodeffective risk management is built into the fabric of the business.
     In addition, we benefited from having a diversified asset base. One of Invesco’s core strengths, and a key differentiator for the company within the industry, is our broad diversification across client domiciles, asset classes and distribution channels. Our geographical diversification recognizes growth opportunities in different parts of the world. Invesco is also diversified by asset class, with 41%approximately 48% of our assets under management in equities and the remaining 59% covering the risk spectrum from alternatives to money market. Invesco’s assets are roughly split between retail52% invested in fixed income and institutional, and the private wealth management channel provides further diversification.other investments. This broad diversification enables Invesco to weatherwithstand different market cycles and take advantage of growth opportunities in various markets and channels.
     On June 1, 2010, the company acquired Morgan Stanley’s retail asset management business, including Van Kampen Investments (the “acquired business” or the “acquisition”) in exchange for a combination of $770.0 million in cash paid and 30.9 million common shares and common share equivalents, which were subsequently sold, as converted, to unrelated third parties. The acquisition added assets under management across equity, fixed income and alternative asset classes (including mutual funds, variable insurance funds, separate accounts and UITs). More specifically, this acquisition:
Expanded the depth and breadth of the company’s investment strategies, enabling the company to offer an even more comprehensive range of investment capabilities and vehicles to its clients around the world;
Enhanced the company’s ability to serve U.S. clients by positioning Invesco among the leading U.S. investment managers by assets under management (AUM), diversity of investment teams and client profiles;
Deepened Invesco’s relationships with clients and strengthen its overall distribution capabilities; and
Further strengthened its position in the Japanese investment management market.
Presentation of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
     The company provides investment management services to, and has transactions with, various private equity, real estate, fund-of-funds, collateralized loan obligation products (CLOs), and other investment entities sponsored by the company for the investment of client assets in the normal course of business. The company serves as the investment manager, making day-to-day investment decisions concerning the assets of the products. Certain of these entities are consolidated under variable interest or voting interest entity consolidation guidance. See Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 1, “Accounting Policies” and Note 20, “Consolidated Investment Products,” for additional details.

24


     Effective January 1, 2010, the company adopted guidance now encompassed in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 810, “Consolidation.” The adoption of this new guidance had a significant impact on the presentation of the company’s financial statements in 2010, as its provisions required the company to consolidate certain CLOs that were not previously consolidated. In accordance with the standard, prior periods have not been restated to reflect the consolidation of these CLOs. The majority of the company’s consolidated investment products balances were CLO-related as of December 31, 2010. The collateral assets of the CLOs are held solely to satisfy the obligations of the CLOs. The company has no right to the benefits from, nor does it bear the risks associated with, the collateral assets held by the CLOs, beyond the company’s minimal direct investments in, and management fees generated from, the CLOs. If the company were to liquidate, the collateral assets would not be available to the general creditors of the company, and as a result, the company does not consider them to be company assets. Additionally, the investors in the CLOs have no recourse to the general credit of the company for the notes issued by the CLOs. The company therefore does not consider this debt to be a company liability.
     The impact of consolidation of investment products is so significant to the presentation of company’s financial statements (but not to the underlying financial condition or results of operations of the company) that, combined with the presentation of newly-incurred transaction and integration costs and additional intangible asset amortization resulting from the acquired business, the company expanded its use of non-GAAP measures beginning with the presentation of the company’s results for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The discussion that follows therefore combines results presented under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) with the company’s non-GAAP presentation. There are four distinct sections within this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations after the Assets Under Management discussion:
Results of Operations (for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared with the year ended December 31, 2009, and for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared with the year ended December 31, 2008);
Schedule of Non-GAAP Information;
Balance Sheet Discussion; and
Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Each of the financial statement summary sections (Results of Operations, Balance Sheet Discussion, and Liquidity and Capital Resources) begins with a table illustrating the impact of the consolidation of investment products. The narrative that follows each of these sections separately provides discussion of the underlying financial statement activity for the company, before consolidation of investment products, as well as of the financial statement activity of consolidated investment products. Additionally, wherever a non-GAAP measure is referenced, a disclosure will follow in the narrative or in the note referring the reader to the Schedule of Non-GAAP Information, where additional details regarding the use of the non-GAAP measure by the company are disclosed, along with reconciliations of the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measures to the non-GAAP measures. To further enhance the readability of the Results of Operations section, separate tables for each of the revenue, expense, and non-operating income/expense sections of the income statement introduce the narrative that follows, providing a section-by-section review of the company’s income statements for the periods presented.

25


Summary Operating Information
     Summary operating information for 2010, 2009 and 2008 is presented in the table below.
             
  Year ended December 31,
U.S. GAAP Financial Measures Summary 2010 2009 2008
Operating revenues $3,487.7m $2,627.3m $3,307.6m
Operating margin  16.9%  18.4%  22.6%
Net income attributable to common shareholders $465.7m $322.5m $481.7m
Diluted EPS $1.01  $0.76  $1.21 
Average assets under management (in billions) $532.3  $415.8  $468.9 
             
  Year ended December 31,
Non-GAAP Financial Measures Summary 2010 2009 2008
Net revenues(1)
 $2,602.2m $1,984.6m $2,490.2m
Adjusted operating margin(2)
  34.5%  28.5%  33.2%
Adjusted net income(3)
 $639.7m $378.1m $527.1m
Adjusted EPS(3)
 $1.38  $0.89  $1.32 
Average assets under management (in billions) $532.3  $415.8  $468.9 
(1)Net revenues are operating revenues less third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses, plus our proportional share of the net revenues of our joint venture investments, plus management fees earned from, less other revenue recorded by, consolidated investment products. See “Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for the reconciliation of operating revenues to net revenues.
(2)Adjusted operating margin is adjusted operating income divided by net revenues. Adjusted operating income includes operating income plus our proportional share of the operating income of our joint venture investments, transaction and integration charges, amortization of acquisition-related prepaid compensation and other intangibles, compensation expense related to market valuation changes in deferred compensation plans, the operating income impact of the consolidation of investment products, and other reconciling items. See “Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for the reconciliation of operating income to adjusted operating income.
(3)Adjusted net income is net income attributable to common shareholders adjusted to add back transaction and integration charges, amortization of acquisition-related prepaid compensation and other intangibles, and the tax cash flow benefits resulting from tax amortization of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. Adjusted net income excludes the net income of consolidated investment products, and the net income impact of deferred compensation plans and other reconciling items. By calculation, adjusted EPS is adjusted net income divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (for diluted EPS). See “Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for the reconciliation of net income to adjusted net income.
A significant portion of our business and assets under management (AUM)AUM is based outside of the U.S. The strengthening or weakening of the U.S. dollar against other currencies, primarily the Pound Sterling and the Canadian dollar, will impact our reported revenues and expenses from period to period. Additionally, our revenues are directly influenced by the level and composition of our AUM. Therefore, movements in global capital market levels, net new business inflows (or outflows) and changes in the mix of investment products between asset classes and geographies may materially affect our revenues from period to period. The returns from most global capital markets increased in the three months and year ended December 31, 2009,2010, which also contributed to net increases in AUM of $6.2$35.7 billion and $65.9 billion(excluding acquisitions) during the respective periods.year. AUM at January 31, 2010,2011, was $412.6$624.3 billion.
     Summary operating information for 2009 and 2008 is presented in the table below.
         
  Year ended December 31,
  2009 2008
Operating revenues $2,627.3 $3,307.6
Net revenues(1)
 $1,978.7 $2,489.4
Operating margin  18.4%  22.6%
Net operating margin(2)
  25.9%  31.6%
Net income attributable to common shareholders $322.5m $481.7m
Diluted EPS $0.76  $1.21 
Average assets under management (in billions) $388.7  $440.6 
(1)Net revenues are operating revenues less third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses plus our proportional share of the net revenues of our joint venture investments. See “Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for the reconciliation of operating revenues to net revenues.
(2)Net operating margin is net operating income divided by net revenues. See “Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for the reconciliation of operating income to net operating income.

26


     On October 19, 2009, the company announced that it entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Morgan Stanley’s retail asset management business, including Van Kampen Investments. The transaction was valued at $1.5 billion (subject to adjustment), consisting of payments by Invesco of $500.0 million in cash and an aggregate of approximately 44.1 million Invesco common shares and non-voting common equivalent preferred shares, which will result in Morgan Stanley obtaining an approximately 9.3% equity interest in our company. The transaction has been approved by the boards of directors of both companies and is expected to close in mid-2010, subject to customary regulatory, client and fund shareholder approvals.
Investment Capabilities Performance Overview
     Invesco’s first strategic priority is to achieve strong investment performance over the long-term for our clients. PerformanceLong-term performance in our equities capabilities, as measured by the percentage of AUM ahead of benchmark and ahead of peer median, is generally strong with some pockets of outstanding performance. Within our equity asset class, U.S. Core, U.K., Asian, Continental European, and Global ex-U.S. and Emerging MarketsU.S. Core have had strong relative performance versus competitors and versus benchmark over three- and five-year periods. Our U.S. Value and Global Ex-U.S. and Emerging Markets have exceptional long-term performance with over 92% of assets ahead of benchmarks and peer group medians. Within our fixed income asset class, Global fixed income products have achieved strong long-term performance with at least 62%80% of AUM ahead of benchmarks and 70%77% of AUM ahead of peers on a 3-year and 5-year basis.
                                                      
 Benchmark Comparison Peer Group Comparison Benchmark Comparison Peer Group Comparison
 % of AUM Ahead of % of AUM In Top Half of % of AUM Ahead of % of AUM In Top Half of
 Benchmark Peer Group Benchmark Peer Group
 1yr 3yr 5yr 1yr 3yr 5yr 1yr 3yr 5yr 1yr 3yr 5yr
Equities U.S. Core  40%  93%  96%  33%  65%  89%Equities U.S. Core  20%  72%  95%  24%  62%  78%
 U.S. Growth  20%  19%  69%  20%  19%  32%   U.S. Growth  43%  31%  69%  59%  46%  53%
 U.S. Value  96%  94%  22%  83%  10%  7%   U.S. Value  59%  95%  94%  61%  92%  94%
 Sector  84%  76%  75%  79%  66%  57%   Sector  56%  74%  71%  22%  42%  63%
 U.K.  0%  91%  91%  0%  90%  92%   U.K.  9%  44%  92%  1%  1%  90%
 Canadian  38%  29%  26%  38%  2%  23%   Canadian  49%  77%  30%  42%  93%  25%
 Asian  50%  85%  85%  53%  72%  81%   Asian  55%  76%  95%  37%  73%  72%
 Continental European  46%  74%  91%  38%  61%  63%   Continental European  63%  84%  93%  53%  76%  77%
 Global  62%  48%  78%  47%  33%  17%   Global  56%  77%  78%  19%  49%  44%
 Global Ex U.S. and Emerging Markets  96%  95%  97%  96%  98%  63%   Global Ex U.S. and Emerging Markets  69%  94%  98%  26%  93%  94%
                         
Balanced Balanced  86%  55%  60%  52%  43%  52%Balanced Balanced  27%  87%  76%  27%  78%  71%
                         
Money MarketMoney Market Money Market  37%  77%  74%  96%  93%  93%
     
Fixed Income Money Market  70%  71%  69%  88%  95%  95%Fixed Income U.S. Fixed Income  71%  38%  43%  69%  60%  60%
 U.S. Fixed Income  78%  62%  72%  32%  70%  70%   Global Fixed Income  48%  80%  83%  40%  77%  77%
 Global Fixed Income  83%  64%  80%  91%  77%  76%
Note: AUM measured in the one-, three-, and five-year peer group rankings represents 69%62%, 68%61%, and 65%59% of total Invesco AUM, respectively, and AUM measured versus benchmark on a one-, three-, and five-year basis represents 84%73%, 82%72%, and 75%68% of total Invesco AUM, respectively, as of 12/31/09.10. Peer group rankings are sourced from a widely-used third party ranking agency in each fund’s market (Lipper, Morningstar, Russell, Mercer, eVestment Alliance, SITCA) and asset-weighted in USD. Rankings are as of prior quarter-end for most institutional products and prior month-end for Australian retail funds due to their late release by third parties. Rankings for the most representative fund in each GIPS composite are applied to all products within each GIPS composite. Excludes Invesco PowerShares, W.L. Ross & Co., Invesco Private Capital, non-discretionary direct real estate products and CLOs. Certain other funds and products were excluded from the analysis because of limited benchmark or peer group data. Had these been available, results may have been different. These results are preliminary and subject to revision. Performance assumes the reinvestment of dividends. Past performance is not indicative of future results and may not reflect an investor’s experience.

27


     Assets Under Management
     The company’s rolling presentation of AUM from period to period (on the following pages) illustrates long-term inflows and outflows separately from the net flows into institutional money market funds. Long-term inflows and the underlying reasons for the movements in this line item include investments from new clients, existing clients adding new accounts/funds or contributions/subscriptions into existing accounts/funds, and new funding commitments into private equity funds. We present net flows into institutional money market funds separately, because shareholders of those funds typically utilize them as short-term funding vehicles and because their flows are particularly sensitive to short-term interest rate movements.
     There are numerous drivers of AUM inflows and outflows, including individual investor decisions to change their investment preferences, fiduciaries making broad asset allocation decisions on behalf of advised clients and reallocation of investments within portfolios. We are not a party to these asset allocation decisions, as the company does not generally have access to the underlying investor’s decision-making process, including their risk appetite or liquidity needs. Therefore, the company is not in a position to provide meaningful information regarding the drivers of inflows and outflows.
     To align our external reporting of AUM with how Invesco is portrayed in the industry and to reflect more fully the company’s revenue drivers, in the three months ended June 30, 2010, the company changed its definition of AUM to include assets with which the company is also associated: the PowerShares QQQQ ETF, PowerShares DB ETFs, and other passive assets. These products previously were not included in the company’s reported AUM because the company does not receive investment management fees from these assets. These assets are marketed as Invesco products, and to include them as part of our AUM more accurately reflects the full size and capabilities of Invesco. Additionally, the company may receive meaningful performance service, distribution, or transaction revenues from these assets. The inclusion of these assets as AUM changed the following data points from those previously disclosed:
         
  Previously Post-Reporting
$ in billions Disclosed Alignment
Ending AUM:
        
December 31, 2006  462.6   482.0 
December 31, 2007  500.1   529.3 
December 31, 2008  357.2   377.1 
December 31, 2009  423.1   459.5 
Average AUM:
        
Year ended December 31, 2006  424.2   430.7 
Year ended December 31, 2007  489.1   511.7 
Year ended December 31, 2008  440.6   468.9 
Year ended December 31, 2009  388.7   415.8 
Net revenue yield on AUM*:
        
Year ended December 31, 2006 56.9bps 55.9bps
Year ended December 31, 2007 59.1bps 56.5bps
Year ended December 31, 2008 56.5bps 53.1bps
Year ended December 31, 2009 50.9bps 47.7bps
Net revenue yield on AUM before performance fees*:
        
Year ended December 31, 2006 55.0bps 54.0bps
Year ended December 31, 2007 57.7bps 55.2bps
Year ended December 31, 2008 54.8bps 51.5bps
Year ended December 31, 2009 50.1bps 47.0bps
Gross revenue yield on AUM*:
        
Year ended December 31, 2006  N/A  75.6bps
Year ended December 31, 2007 80.0bps 76.5bps
Year ended December 31, 2008 75.8bps 71.2bps
Year ended December 31, 2009 68.2bps 63.8bps
Gross revenue yield on AUM before performance fees*:
        
Year ended December 31, 2006  N/A  73.6bps
Year ended December 31, 2007 78.5bps 75.1bps
Year ended December 31, 2008 74.1bps 69.6bps
Year ended December 31, 2009 67.5bps 63.0bps
*Net and gross revenue yield are defined in the paragraphs that follow this table.

28


     Additionally, as a result of the acquisition, the company now manages unit investment trust (UIT) products, which are categorized in this passive asset group, and for which we earn revenues related to transactional sales charges from the sale of these products and trading income arising from securities temporarily held to form new UIT products.
     AUM at December 31, 2010 were $616.5 billion (December 31, 2009: $459.5 billion; December 31, 2008: $377.1 billion). The acquisition added $114.6 billion in AUM at June 1, 2010. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2010, other acquisitions added $6.9 billion of AUM, net of dispositions. During the year ended December 31, 2010, net inflows increased AUM by $5.5 billion, while positive market movements increased AUM by $43.9 billion. We experienced net outflows in institutional money market funds of $15.5 billion and increases in AUM of $1.6 billion due to changes in foreign exchange rates during the year ended December 31, 2010. During the year ended December 31, 2009, were $423.1net inflows increased AUM by $16.6 billion comparedand positive market movements increased AUM by $54.7 billion. We experienced net outflows in institutional money market funds of $0.1 billion and increases in AUM of $11.2 billion due to $357.2changes in foreign exchange rates during the year ended December 31, 2009. During the year ended December 31, 2008, net outflows decreased AUM by $20.3 billion atand negative market movements decreased AUM by $113.0 billion. We experienced net inflows in institutional money market funds of $8.4 billion and decreases in AUM of $27.3 billion due to changes in foreign exchange rates during the year ended December 31, 2008. The increase inAverage AUM during the year ended December 31, 2010 included the impact of the acquired business and were $532.3 billion, compared to $415.8 billion for the year ended December 31, 2009 and $468.9 billion for the year ended December 31, 2008.
     Net inflows during the year ended December 31, 2010 included net long-term inflows of ETF, UIT and passive AUM of $4.3 billion and other net long-term inflows of $1.2 billion. Net flows were driven by net inflows into our institutional and high net worth distribution channels of $5.6 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively, primarily in the fixed income asset class, while our Retail distribution channel experienced net outflows of $1.2 billion.
     Market gains and losses/reinvestment of AUM includes the net change in AUM resulting from changes in market values of the underlying investments from period to period and reinvestment of client dividends. Of the total increase in AUM resulting from market gains during the year ended December 31, 2010, $33.4 billion of this increase was due to $46.1the change in value of our equity asset class across all of our business components. Our balanced and alternatives asset classes were also positively impacted by the change in market valuations during the period. During the year ended December 31, 2010, our equity AUM increased in line with equity markets globally. As discussed in the “Executive Overview” section of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis, the S&P 500 and the FTSE 100 indices increased 12.8% and 9.0%, respectively, during the year ended December 31, 2010. Of the $54.7 billion increase in increasedAUM resulting from market values, $10.9increases during the year ended December 31, 2009, $42.1 billion impact of more favorablethis increase was due to the change in value of our equity asset class, in line with increases in the S&P 500 and the FTSE 100 indices of 23.5% and 22.1%, respectively, during that period. Of the $113.0 billion decrease in AUM resulting from market declines during the year ended December 31, 2008, $94.7 billion of this decrease was due to the change in value of our equity asset class, in line with decreases in the S&P 500 and the FTSE 100 indices of 37.0% and 28.0%, respectively, during that period.
     Foreign exchange rate movements in our AUM result from the effect of changes in foreign exchange rates from period to period as non-U.S. Dollar denominated AUM is translated into U.S. Dollars, the reporting currency of the company. The impact of the change in foreign exchange rates at December 31, 2010 was driven primarily by the weakening of the Pound Sterling relative to the U.S. Dollar, which was reflected in the translation of our Pound Sterling-based AUM into U.S. Dollars, the strengthening of the Canadian Dollar relative to the U.S. Dollar, which was reflected in the translation of our Canadian Dollar-based AUM into U.S. Dollars, and total net inflowsto the weakening of $8.9 billion (long-term net flows plus net flowsthe Euro relative to the U.S. Dollar, which was reflected in institutional money market funds). Averagethe translation of our Euro-based AUM into U.S. Dollars. The impact of the change in foreign exchange rates at December 31, 2009 was driven by the strengthening of the Pound Sterling, Canadian Dollar and Euro relative to the U.S. Dollar. The impact of the change in foreign exchange rates at December 31, 2008 was driven by the weakening of the Pound Sterling, Canadian Dollar and Euro relative to the U.S. Dollar.
     The table below illustrates the spot foreign exchange rates for translation into the U.S. Dollar, the reporting currency of the company, at December 31, 2010, 2009, were $388.7 billion, compared to $440.6 billion in 2008. Our retail total net inflows for 2009 were $11.0 billion, compared to total net outflows of $10.6 billion in 2008. Institutional net outflows were $2.5 billion in 2009, compared to total net outflows of $3.1 billion in 2008. Our Private Wealth Management (PWM) channel had total net inflows of $0.4 billion in 2009 compared to total net inflows of $0.2 billion in 2008.and 2008:
             
  December 31, 2010 December 31, 2009 December 31, 2008
Pound Sterling ($  per £)  1.56   1.61   1.45 
Canadian Dollar (CAD per $)  0.99   1.05   1.23 
Euro ($  per Euro)  1.34   1.43   1.39 

29


     Net revenue yield on AUM declined 5.6 basis pointsincreased slightly to 50.948.9 basis points in the year ended December 31, 2009,2010 from the year ended December 31, 2008,2009 level of 56.547.7 basis points, resulting from marketpoints. The acquired business added $114.6 billion in AUM at June 1, 2010 with an approximate effective fee rate of 47 basis points. Market driven changes in our asset mix and an 11.8% decline in average AUM from the year ended December 31, 2008.significantly impact our net revenue yield calculation. Our equity AUM generally earn a higher net revenue rate than money market AUM. Net revenues declined 20.5% during the year endedAt December 31, 2010, equity AUM were $294.1 billion, representing 48% of our total AUM at that date; whereas at December 31, 2009, compared to the year endedequity AUM were $192.7 billion, representing 42% of our total AUM at that date. In addition, ETF, UIT and Passive AUM generally earn a lower effective fee rate than AUM excluding ETF, UIT and Passive asset classes. At December 31, 2008.2010, ETF, UIT and Passive AUM were $80.8 billion, representing 13.1% of total AUM at that date; whereas at December 31, 2009, ETF, UIT and Passive AUM were $53.0 billion, representing 11.5% of our total AUM at that date.
     Gross revenue yield on AUM declined 7.6increased 2.2 basis points to 68.266.0 basis points in the year ended December 31, 2009,2010 from the year ended December 31, 2008,2009 level of 75.863.8 basis points. Management does not consider gross revenue yield, the most comparable U.S. GAAP-based measure to net revenue yield, to be a meaningful effective fee rate measure. The numerator of the gross revenue yield measure, operating revenues, excludes the management fees earned from consolidated investment products; however the denominator of the measure includes the AUM of these investment products. Therefore, the gross revenue yield measure is not considered representative of the company’s true effective fee rate from AUM. See “Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for a reconciliation of operating revenues (gross revenues) to net revenues.
     Changes in AUM were as follows:
                            
 AUM ex AUM ex  
 AUM ex ETF, ETF, UIT & ETF, UIT & ETF, UIT & ETF, UIT & ETF, UIT &
             Total AUM UIT & Passive Passive Total AUM Passive Passive Total AUM Passive Passive
$ in billions 2009 2008 2007  2010 2010 2010 2009 2009 2009 2008 2008 2008
January 1, $357.2 $500.1 $462.6 
January 1 459.5 406.5 53.0 377.1 346.6 30.5 529.3 484.0 45.3 
Long-term inflows 71.2 72.7 119.9  154.7 84.6 70.1 106.1 65.7 40.4 136.5 66.0 70.5 
Long-term outflows  (62.2)  (94.6)  (123.3)  (149.2)  (83.4)  (65.8)  (89.5)  (59.9)  (29.6)  (156.8)  (89.9)  (66.9)
                          
Long-term net flows 9.0  (21.9)  (3.4) 5.5 1.2 4.3 16.6 5.8 10.8  (20.3)  (23.9) 3.6 
Net flows in money market funds  (0.1) 8.4 10.1 
Net flows in institutional money market funds  (15.5)  (15.5)   (0.1)  (0.1)  8.4 8.4  
Market gains and losses/reinvestment 46.1  (102.8) 20.0  43.9 36.3 7.6 54.7 43.3 11.4  (113.0)  (95.2)  (17.8)
Acquisitions/dispositions, net 121.5 107.1 14.4       
Foreign currency translation 10.9  (26.6) 10.8  1.6 0.1 1.5 11.2 10.9 0.3  (27.3)  (26.7)  (0.6)
                          
December 31, $423.1 $357.2 $500.1 
December 31 616.5 535.7 80.8 459.5 406.5 53.0 377.1 346.6 30.5 
                          
Average long-term AUM $301.7 $360.8 $424.2  463.5 393.8 69.7 328.8 291.2 37.6 389.1 363.9 25.2 
Average institutional money market AUM 87.0 79.8 64.9  68.8 68.8  87.0 87.0  79.8 79.8  
                          
Average AUM $388.7 $440.6 $489.1  532.3 462.6 69.7 415.8 378.2 37.6 468.9 443.7 25.2 
                          
Gross revenue yield on AUM(1)
 68.2bps 75.8bps 80.0bps  66.0bps 74.3bps 10.8bps 63.8bps 68.8bps 13.4bps 71.2bps 74.1bps 20.1bps
Gross revenue yield on AUM before performance fees(1)
 67.5bps 74.1bps 78.5bps  65.5bps 73.8bps 10.8bps 63.0bps 68.0bps 13.4bps 69.6bps 72.2bps 20.1bps
Net revenue yield on AUM (annualized)(2)
 50.9bps 56.5bps 59.1bps 
Net revenue yield on AUM before performance fees (annualized)(2)
 50.1bps 54.8bps 57.7bps 
Net revenue yield on AUM(2)
 48.9bps 54.6bps 10.8bps 47.7bps 51.1bps 13.4bps 53.1bps 55.0bps 20.1bps
Net revenue yield on AUM before performance fees(2)
 48.4bps 54.1bps 10.8bps 47.0bps 50.4bps 13.4bps 51.5bps 53.3bps 20.1bps
 
(1) Gross revenue yield on AUM is equal to annualized total operating revenues divided by average AUM, excluding joint venture (JV) AUM. Our share of the average AUM in 2010 for our JVs in China was $3.6 billion (2009: $3.7 billion, in 2009 (2008:2008: $4.5 billion; 2007: $4.2 billion). It is appropriate to exclude the average AUM of our JVs for purposes of computing gross revenue yield on AUM, because the revenues resulting from these AUM are not presented in our operating revenues. Under U.S. GAAP, our share of the pre-tax earnings of the JVs is recorded as equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates on our Consolidated Statements of Income.
 
(2) Net revenue yield on AUM is equal to annualized net revenues divided by average AUM. See the Schedule“Schedule of Non-GAAP InformationInformation” for a reconciliation of operating revenues to net revenues.

2830


Our AUM by channel, by asset class, and by client domicile were as follows:
Total AUM by Channel(1)
                
 Private
                 Wealth
$ in billions Total Retail Institutional PWM  Total Retail Institutional Management
January 1, 2007(a) AUM
 $462.6 $238.9 $207.1 $16.6 
January 1, 2010 AUM 459.5 239.4 204.9 15.2 
Long-term inflows 119.9 86.6 28.2 5.1  154.7 106.2 45.2 3.3 
Long-term outflows  (123.3)  (80.6)  (37.4)  (5.3)  (149.2)  (107.4)  (39.6)  (2.2)
                  
Long-term net flows  (3.4) 6.0  (9.2)  (0.2) 5.5  (1.2) 5.6 1.1 
Net flows in money market funds 10.1  (0.3) 10.4  
Net flows in institutional money market funds  (15.5)   (15.5)  
Market gains and losses/reinvestment 20.0 11.3 7.8 0.9  43.9 36.8 6.4 0.7 
Acquisitions/dispositions, net 121.5 104.0 17.5  
Foreign currency translation 10.8 8.5 2.3   1.6  (0.6) 2.2  
                  
December 31, 2007(a) AUM
 $500.1 $264.4 $218.4 $17.3 
December 31, 2010 AUM 616.5 378.4 221.1 17.0 
                  
 
January 1, 2009 AUM (2)
 377.1 165.9 197.8 13.4 
Long-term inflows 72.7 48.1 19.7 4.9  106.1 85.1 16.1 4.9 
Long-term outflows  (94.6)  (58.7)  (31.2)  (4.7)  (89.5)  (67.0)  (18.0)  (4.5)
                  
Long-term net flows  (21.9)  (10.6)  (11.5) 0.2  16.6 18.1  (1.9) 0.4 
Net flows in money market funds 8.4  8.4  
Market gains and losses/reinvestment  (102.8)  (79.2)  (19.4)  (4.2)
Foreign currency translation  (26.6)  (25.3)  (1.3)  
         
December 31, 2008(a) AUM
 $357.2 $149.3 $194.6 $13.3 
         
Long-term inflows
 71.2 50.6 15.7 4.9 
Long-term outflows
  (62.2)  (39.6)  (18.1)  (4.5)
         
Long-term net flows
 9.0 11.0  (2.4) 0.4 
Net flows in money market funds
  (0.1)   (0.1)  
Net flows in institutional money market funds  (0.1)   (0.1)  
Market gains and losses/reinvestment
 46.1 37.0 7.6 1.5  54.7 45.7 7.6 1.4 
Foreign currency translation
 10.9 9.6 1.3   11.2 9.7 1.5  
                  
December 31, 2009 AUM
 $423.1 $206.9 $201.0 $15.2  459.5 239.4 204.9 15.2 
                  
 
January 1, 2008 AUM (2)
 529.3 287.9 224.0 17.4 
Long-term inflows 136.5 111.6 20.1 4.8 
Long-term outflows  (156.8)  (121.1)  (31.1)  (4.6)
         
Long-term net flows  (20.3)  (9.5)  (11.0) 0.2 
Net flows in institutional money market funds 8.4 0.6 7.8  
Market gains and losses/reinvestment  (113.0)  (87.5)  (21.3)  (4.2)
Foreign currency translation  (27.3)  (25.6)  (1.7)  
         
December 31, 2008 AUM 377.1 165.9 197.8 13.4 
         
 
(a)See accompanying notes to these AUM tables on the following page.

31


ETF, UIT & Passive AUM by Channel(1)
                 
              Private
              Wealth
$ in billions Total Retail Institutional Management
January 1, 2010 AUM  53.0   48.0   5.0    
Long-term inflows  70.1   51.2   18.9    
Long-term outflows  (65.8)  (47.2)  (18.6)   
                 
Long-term net flows  4.3   4.0   0.3    
Net flows in institutional money market funds            
Market gains and losses/reinvestment  7.6   4.8   2.8    
Acquisitions/dispositions, net  14.4   13.7   0.7    
Foreign currency translation  1.5      1.5    
                 
December 31, 2010 AUM  80.8   70.5   10.3    
                 
                 
January 1, 2009 AUM (2)
  30.5   27.1   3.4    
Long-term inflows  40.4   40.1   0.3    
Long-term outflows  (29.6)  (29.6)      
                 
Long-term net flows  10.8   10.5   0.3    
Net flows in institutional money market funds            
Market gains and losses/reinvestment  11.4   10.3   1.1    
Foreign currency translation  0.3   0.1   0.2    
                 
December 31, 2009 AUM  53.0   48.0   5.0    
                 
                 
January 1, 2008 AUM (2)
  45.3   41.1   4.2    
Long-term inflows  70.5   70.3   0.2    
Long-term outflows  (66.9)  (66.9)      
                 
Long-term net flows  3.6   3.4   0.2    
Net flows in institutional money market funds            
Market gains and losses/reinvestment  (17.8)  (17.4)  (0.4)   
Foreign currency translation  (0.6)     (0.6)   
                 
December 31, 2008 AUM  30.5   27.1   3.4    
                 
See accompanying notes to these AUM tables on the following page.

32


Total AUM by Asset Class(3)
                         
          Fixed      Money    
$ in billions Total  Equity  Income  Balanced  Market  Alternatives(4) 
January 1, 2010 AUM  459.5   192.7   76.1   39.9   83.5   67.3 
Long-term inflows  154.7   95.8   32.7   8.2   1.5   16.5 
Long-term outflows  (149.2)  (104.4)  (19.1)  (7.4)  (1.9)  (16.4)
                   
Long-term net flows  5.5   (8.6)  13.6   0.8   (0.4)  0.1 
Net flows in institutional money market funds  (15.5)           (15.5)   
Market gains and losses/reinvestment  43.9   33.4   4.2   2.5   0.1   3.7 
Acquisitions/dispositions, net  121.5   75.1   37.9   0.3   0.6   7.6 
Foreign currency translation  1.6   1.5   0.1          
                   
December 31, 2010 AUM  616.5   294.1   131.9   43.5   68.3(5)  78.7 
                   
                         
January 1, 2009 AUM(2)
  377.1   140.7   61.4   31.7   84.2   59.1 
Long-term inflows  106.1   58.4   19.4   8.2   2.2   17.9 
Long-term outflows  (89.5)  (55.2)  (12.6)  (8.0)  (3.1)  (10.6)
                   
Long-term net flows  16.6   3.2   6.8   0.2   (0.9)  7.3 
Net flows in institutional money market funds  (0.1)           (0.1)   
Market gains and losses/reinvestment  54.7   42.1   6.5   6.0      0.1 
Foreign currency translation  11.2   6.7   1.4   2.0   0.3   0.8 
                   
December 31, 2009 AUM  459.5   192.7   76.1   39.9   83.5   67.3 
                   
                         
January 1, 2008 AUM(2)
  529.3   269.6   69.1   45.9   75.3   69.4 
Long-term inflows  136.5   93.2   14.8   8.9   3.9   15.7 
Long-term outflows  (156.8)  (109.4)  (17.5)  (10.2)  (3.6)  (16.1)
                   
Long-term net flows  (20.3)  (16.2)  (2.7)  (1.3)  0.3   (0.4)
Net flows in institutional money market funds  8.4            8.4    
Market gains and losses/reinvestment  (113.0)  (94.7)  (2.5)  (8.5)  0.7   (8.0)
Foreign currency translation  (27.3)  (18.0)  (2.5)  (4.4)  (0.5)  (1.9)
                   
December 31, 2008 AUM  377.1   140.7   61.4   31.7   84.2   59.1 
                   
See accompanying notes to these AUM tables on the following page.

33


ETF, UIT and Passive AUM by Asset Class(3)
                         
          Fixed     Money  
$ in billions Total Equity Income Balanced Market Alternatives(4)
January 1, 2010 AUM  53.0   31.1   4.0         17.9 
Long-term inflows  70.1   56.5   7.4         6.2 
Long-term outflows  (65.8)  (56.3)  (1.4)        (8.1)
                         
Long-term net flows  4.3   0.2   6.0         (1.9)
Net flows in institutional money market funds                  
Market gains and losses/reinvestment  7.6   5.6   0.6         1.4 
Acquisitions/dispositions, net  14.4   4.5   9.2         0.7 
Foreign currency translation  1.5   1.4            0.1 
                         
December 31, 2010 AUM  80.8   42.8   19.8         18.2 
                         
                         
January 1, 2009 AUM(2)
  30.5   21.6   0.9         8.0 
Long-term inflows  40.4   26.4   2.5         11.5 
Long-term outflows  (29.6)  (25.7)           (3.9)
                         
Long-term net flows  10.8   0.7   2.5         7.6 
Net flows in institutional money market funds                  
Market gains and losses/reinvestment  11.4   8.8   0.6         2.0 
Foreign currency translation  0.3               0.3 
                         
December 31, 2009 AUM  53.0   31.1   4.0         17.9 
                         
                         
January 1, 2008 AUM(2)
  45.3   37.3   0.1         7.9 
Long-term inflows  70.5   61.8   0.9         7.8 
Long-term outflows  (66.9)  (61.1)           (5.8)
                         
Long-term net flows  3.6   0.7   0.9         2.0 
Net flows in institutional money market funds                  
Market gains and losses/reinvestment  (17.8)  (16.4)  (0.1)        (1.3)
Foreign currency translation  (0.6)              (0.6)
                         
December 31, 2008 AUM  30.5   21.6   0.9         8.0 
                         
See accompanying notes to these AUM tables on the following page.

34


Total AUM by Client Domicile(6)
                         
                  Continental  
$ in billions Total U.S. Canada U.K. Europe Asia
January 1, 2010 AUM  459.5   294.1   29.0   84.9   24.4   27.1 
Long-term inflows  154.7   94.1   2.1   16.2   15.7   26.6 
Long-term outflows  (149.2)  (88.8)  (6.8)  (14.1)  (12.3)  (27.2)
                         
Long-term net flows  5.5   5.3   (4.7)  2.1   3.4   (0.6)
Net flows in institutional money market funds  (15.5)  (16.5)     (1.5)  3.5   (1.0)
Market gains and losses/reinvestment  43.9   30.0   2.2   7.0   2.0   2.7 
Acquisitions/dispositions, net  121.5   102.6   0.1   1.8   2.9   14.1 
Foreign currency translation  1.6   (0.1)  1.3   (2.2)  (0.9)  3.5 
                         
December 31, 2010 AUM  616.5   415.4   27.9   92.1   35.3   45.8 
                         
                         
January 1, 2009 AUM(2)
  377.1   252.7   23.8   57.1   22.3   21.2 
Long-term inflows  106.1   68.7   1.9   18.4   9.9   7.2 
Long-term outflows  (89.5)  (58.3)  (5.3)  (7.5)  (10.8)  (7.6)
                         
Long-term net flows  16.6   10.4   (3.4)  10.9   (0.9)  (0.4)
Net flows in institutional money market funds  (0.1)  2.8   (0.1)     (1.4)  (1.4)
Market gains and losses/reinvestment  54.7   28.2   4.4   11.2   3.8   7.1 
Foreign currency translation  11.2      4.3   5.7   0.6   0.6 
                         
December 31, 2009 AUM  459.5   294.1   29.0   84.9   24.4   27.1 
                         
                         
January 1, 2008 AUM(2)
  529.3   318.8   46.3   90.9   36.2   37.1 
Long-term inflows  136.5   99.9   3.0   17.0   10.7   5.9 
Long-term outflows  (156.8)  (108.4)  (9.7)  (10.0)  (17.1)  (11.6)
                         
Long-term net flows  (20.3)  (8.5)  (6.7)  7.0   (6.4)  (5.7)
Net flows in institutional money market funds  8.4   4.1      (0.7)  2.1   2.9 
Market gains and losses/reinvestment  (113.0)  (61.7)  (8.5)  (21.5)  (8.1)  (13.2)
Foreign currency translation  (27.3)     (7.3)  (18.6)  (1.5)  0.1 
                         
December 31, 2008 AUM  377.1   252.7   23.8   57.1   22.3   21.2 
                         
See accompanying notes to these AUM tables on the following page.

35


ETF, UIT and Passive AUM by Client Domicile(6)
                         
                  Continental  
$ in billions Total U.S. Canada U.K. Europe Asia(7)
January 1, 2010 AUM  53.0   50.4         1.0   1.6 
Long-term inflows  70.1   54.1         0.2   15.8 
Long-term outflows  (65.8)  (46.9)        (0.3)  (18.6)
                         
Long-term net flows  4.3   7.2         (0.1)  (2.8)
Net flows in institutional money market funds                  
Market gains and losses/reinvestment  7.6   6.2         0.2   1.2 
Acquisitions/dispositions, net  14.4   13.7            0.7 
Foreign currency translation  1.5               1.5 
                         
December 31, 2010 AUM  80.8   77.5         1.1   2.2 
                         
                         
January 1, 2009 AUM(2)
  30.5   29.0         0.5   1.0 
Long-term inflows  40.4   40.0         0.4    
Long-term outflows  (29.6)  (29.5)        (0.1)   
                         
Long-term net flows  10.8   10.5         0.3    
Net flows in institutional money market funds                  
Market gains and losses/reinvestment  11.4   10.8         0.2   0.4 
Foreign currency translation  0.3   0.1            0.2 
                         
December 31, 2009 AUM  53.0   50.4         1.0   1.6 
                         
                         
January 1, 2008 AUM(2)
  45.3   42.9         0.3   2.1 
Long-term inflows  70.5   69.9         0.6    
Long-term outflows  (66.9)  (66.5)        (0.4)   
                         
Long-term net flows  3.6   3.4         0.2    
Net flows in institutional money market funds                  
Market gains and losses/reinvestment  (17.8)  (17.2)           (0.6)
Foreign currency translation  (0.6)  (0.1)           (0.5)
                         
December 31, 2008 AUM  30.5   29.0         0.5   1.0 
                         
(1)Channel refers to the distribution channel from which the AUM originated. Retail AUM arose from client investments into funds available to the public with shares or units. Institutional AUM originated from individual corporate clients, endowments, foundations, government authorities, universities, or charities. Private Wealth Management AUM arose from high net worth client investments.
(2) The beginning balances were adjusted to reflect certain asset reclassifications.

29


AUM by Asset Class
                         
          Fixed      Money    
$ in billions Total  Equity  Income  Balanced  Market  Alternatives(b) 
January 1, 2007(a) AUM
 $462.6  $214.3  $84.0  $46.6  $65.3  $52.4 
Long-term inflows  119.9   74.6   14.7   10.1   1.5   19.0 
Long-term outflows  (123.3)  (64.2)  (35.1)  (9.6)  (2.1)  (12.3)
                   
Long-term net flows  (3.4)  10.4   (20.4)  0.5   (0.6)  6.7 
Net flows in money market funds  10.1   (0.6)  0.2   (1.3)  10.6   1.2 
Market gains and losses/reinvestment  20.0   14.1   3.7   0.2      2.0 
Foreign currency translation  10.8   6.5   1.3   2.8   0.1   0.1 
                   
December 31, 2007(a) AUM
 $500.1  $244.7  $68.8  $48.8  $75.4  $62.4 
                   
Long-term inflows  72.7   38.2   13.8   9.0   3.7   8.0 
Long-term outflows  (94.6)  (52.8)  (17.4)  (10.3)  (3.7)  (10.4)
                   
Long-term net flows  (21.9)  (14.6)  (3.6)  (1.3)     (2.4)
Net flows in money market funds  8.4            8.4    
Market gains and losses/reinvestment  (102.8)  (84.5)  (1.3)  (10.2)  0.7   (7.5)
Foreign currency translation  (26.6)  (18.0)  (2.4)  (4.5)  (0.3)  (1.4)
                   
December 31, 2008(a) AUM
 $357.2  $127.6  $61.5  $32.8  $84.2  $51.1 
                   
Long-term inflows
  71.2   35.2   19.1   8.2   2.2   6.5 
Long-term outflows
  (62.2)  (31.9)  (12.5)  (7.9)  (3.1)  (6.8)
                   
Long-term net flows
  9.0   3.3   6.6   0.3   (0.9)  (0.3)
Net flows in money market funds
  (0.1)           (0.1)   
Market gains and losses/reinvestment
  46.1   35.9   5.8   6.0   0.1   (1.7)
Foreign currency translation
  10.9   6.6   1.3   2.4   0.2   0.4 
                   
December 31, 2009 AUM
 $423.1  $173.4  $75.2  $41.5  $83.5(c) $49.5 
                   
(a)The beginning balances were adjustedreclassifications, including the previously discussed AUM reporting alignment to reflect certain asset reclassifications.include ETF, UIT and passive AUM.
 
(b)(3) The alternative asset class includes financial structures, absolute return, real estate, private equity, asset allocation, portable alpha and multiple asset strategies.Asset classes are descriptive groupings of AUM by common type of underlying investments.
 
(c)(4)See Part I, Item 1, “Business — Objectives by Asset Class” for a description of the investment objectives included within the Alternatives asset class.
(5) Ending Money Market AUM includes $79.5$64.2 billion in institutional money market AUM and $4.0$4.1 billion in retail money market AUM.
(6)Client domicile disclosure groups AUM by the domicile of the underlying clients.
(7)Net flows in Asia in 2010 were driven by an inflow of $15.8 billion in the three months ended June 30, 2010 and an outflow of $18.6 billion in the three months ended December 31, 2010 related to a passive mandate in Japan which was a post-close direct consequence of the acquired business.

3036


AUM by Client Domicile
                         
                  Continental    
$ in billions Total  U.S.  Canada  U.K.  Europe  Asia 
January 1, 2007(a) AUM
 $462.6  $280.3  $43.3  $73.8  $38.6  $26.6 
Long-term inflows  119.9   48.2   6.7   22.0   21.4   21.6 
Long-term outflows  (123.3)  (64.7)  (6.8)  (10.0)  (25.6)  (16.2)
                   
Long-term net flows  (3.4)  (16.5)  (0.1)  12.0   (4.2)  5.4 
Net flows in money market funds  10.1   11.0      0.2   (0.5)  (0.6)
Market gains and losses/reinvestment  20.0   14.9   (4.1)  2.7   1.8   4.7 
Foreign currency translation  10.8      7.6   0.4   2.0   0.8 
                   
December 31, 2007(a) AUM
 $500.1  $289.7  $46.7  $89.1  $37.7  $36.9 
                   
Long-term inflows  72.7   36.2   2.9   17.2   10.0   6.4 
Long-term outflows  (94.6)  (46.4)  (9.7)  (9.9)  (16.8)  (11.8)
                   
Long-term net flows  (21.9)  (10.2)  (6.8)  7.3   (6.8)  (5.4)
Net flows in money market funds  8.4   4.5      0.2   1.2   2.5 
Market gains and losses/reinvestment  (102.8)  (51.5)  (8.5)  (21.5)  (8.1)  (13.2)
Foreign currency translation  (26.6)     (7.3)  (18.4)  (1.6)  0.7 
                   
December 31, 2008(a) AUM
 $357.2  $232.5  $24.1  $56.7  $22.4  $21.5 
                   
Long-term inflows
  71.2   33.9   2.0   18.5   9.8   7.0 
Long-term outflows
  (62.2)  (31.1)  (5.3)  (8.4)  (9.9)  (7.5)
                   
Long-term net flows
  9.0   2.8   (3.3)  10.1   (0.1)  (0.5)
Net flows in money market funds
  (0.1)  2.9      (0.1)  (1.4)  (1.5)
Market gains and losses/reinvestment
  46.1   19.5   4.3   12.1   2.8   7.4 
Foreign currency translation
  10.9      3.9   5.7   0.7   0.6 
                   
December 31, 2009 AUM
 $423.1  $257.7  $29.0  $84.5  $24.4  $27.5 
                   
(a)The beginning balances were adjusted to reflect certain asset reclassifications.
Results of Operations
Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2009, Compared2010, compared with the Year Ended December 31, 20082009
Adoption of Guidance now encompassed in Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 810, “Consolidation”
     The company provides investment management services to, and has transactions with, various private equity, real estate, fund-of-funds, collateralized loan obligation products (CLOs), and other investment entities sponsored by the company for the investment of client assets in the normal course of business. The company serves as the investment manager, making day-to-day investment decisions concerning the assets of the products. Certain of these entities are consolidated under variable interest or voting interest entity consolidation guidance. See Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 1, “Accounting Policies” and Note 20, “Consolidated Investment Products,” for additional details.
     The guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 810, which was effective January 1, 2010, had a significant impact on the presentation of the company’s financial statements in 2010, as its provisions required the company to consolidate certain CLOs that were not previously consolidated. In accordance with the standard, prior periods have not been restated to reflect the consolidation of these CLOs.
     The majority of the company’s consolidated investment products balances were CLO-related as of December 31, 2010. The collateral assets of the CLOs are held solely to satisfy the obligations of the CLOs. The company has no right to the benefits from, nor does it bear the risks associated with, the collateral assets held by the CLOs, beyond the company’s minimal direct investments in, and management fees generated from, the CLOs. If the company were to liquidate, the collateral assets would not be available to the general creditors of the company, and as a result, the company does not consider them to be company assets. Additionally, the investors in the CLOs have no recourse to the general credit of the company for the notes issued by the CLOs. The company therefore does not consider this debt to be a company liability. The discussion that follows will separate consolidated investment product results of operations from the company’s investment management operations through the use of non-GAAP financial measures. See “Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for additional details and reconciliations of the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measures to the non-GAAP measures.

37


Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income
                 
      Consolidated    
  Before Investment    
$ in millions Consolidation(1) Products(2) Adjustments(1)(3) Total
Year ended December 31, 2010
                
Total operating revenues  3,532.7   0.3   (45.3)  3,487.7 
Total operating expenses  2,887.8   55.3   (45.3)  2,897.8 
                 
Operating income  644.9   (55.0)     589.9 
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates  40.8      (0.6)  40.2 
Interest and dividend income  10.4   246.0   (5.1)  251.3 
Other investment income/(losses)  15.6   107.6   6.4   129.6 
Interest expense  (58.6)  (123.7)  5.1   (177.2)
                 
Income before income taxes, including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests  653.1   174.9   5.8   833.8 
Income tax provision  (197.0)        (197.0)
                 
Net income, including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests  456.1   174.9   5.8   636.8 
(Gains)/losses attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities, net  (0.2)  (170.8)  (0.1)  (171.1)
                 
Net income attributable to common shareholders  455.9   4.1   5.7   465.7 
                 
                 
      Consolidated    
  Before Investment    
$ in millions Consolidation(1) Products(2) Adjustments(3) Total
Year ended December 31, 2009
                
Total operating revenues  2,633.3   1.9   (7.9)  2,627.3 
Total operating expenses  (2,139.5)  (11.4)  7.9   (2,143.0)
                 
Operating income  493.8   (9.5)     484.3 
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates  24.5      2.5   27.0 
Interest and dividend income  9.8         9.8 
Other investment income/(losses)  7.8   (106.9)     (99.1)
Interest expense  (64.5)        (64.5)
                 
Income before income taxes, including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests  471.4   (116.4)  2.5   357.5 
Income tax provision  (148.2)        (148.2)
                 
Net income, including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests  323.2   (116.4)  2.5   209.3 
(Gains)/losses attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities, net  (0.7)  113.9      113.2 
                 
Net income attributable to common shareholders  322.5   (2.5)  2.5   322.5 
                 
(1)The Before Consolidation column includes Invesco’s equity interests in the investment products accounted for as equity method (private equity and real estate partnership funds) and available-for-sale investments (CLOs). Upon consolidation of the CLOs, the company’s and the CLOs’ accounting policies were effectively aligned, resulting in the reclassification of the company’s gain for the year ended December 31, 2010 of $6.4 million (representing the increase in the market value of the company’s holding in the consolidated CLOs) from other comprehensive income into other gains/losses. The company’s gain on its investment in the CLOs (before consolidation) eliminates with the company’s share of the offsetting loss on the CLOs’ debt. The net income arising from consolidation of CLOs is therefore completely attributed to other investors in these CLOs, as the company’s share has been eliminated through consolidation. The Before Consolidation column does not include any other adjustments related to non-GAAP financial measure presentation.
(2)The company adopted guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 810 on January 1, 2010 resulting in the consolidation of certain CLOs. In accordance with the standard, prior periods have not been restated to reflect the consolidation of these CLOs. Prior to January 1, 2010, the company was not deemed to be the primary beneficiary of these CLOs.
(3)Adjustments include the elimination of intercompany transactions between the company and its consolidated investment products, primarily the elimination of management fees expensed by the funds and recorded as operating revenues (before consolidation) by the company.

38


Operating Revenues and Net Revenues
     The main categories of revenues, and the dollar and percentage change between the periods, are as follows:
                 
$ in millions 2010 2009 $ Change % Change
Investment management fees  2,720.9   2,120.2   600.7   28.3%
Service and distribution fees  645.5   412.6   232.9   56.4%
Performance fees  26.1   30.0   (3.9)  (13.0)%
Other  95.2   64.5   30.7   47.6%
                 
Total operating revenues  3,487.7   2,627.3   860.4   32.7%
Third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses  (972.7)  (693.4)  279.3   40.3%
Proportional share of revenues, net of third-party distribution expenses, from joint venture investments  42.2   44.7   (2.5)  (5.6)%
Management fees earned from consolidated investment products  45.3   8.0   37.3   N/A 
Other revenues recorded by consolidated investment products  (0.3)  (2.0)  1.7   85.0%
                 
Net revenues  2,602.2   1,984.6   617.6   31.1%
                 
     Operating revenues decreasedincreased by 20.6%32.7% in 20092010 to $3,487.7 million (year ended December 31, 2009: $2,627.3 million). Net revenues increased by 31.1% in 2010 to $2,602.2 million (2008: $3,307.6(year ended December 31, 2009: $1,984.6 million). Net revenues are operating revenues less third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses, plus our proportional share of net revenues from joint venture arrangements. Net revenues decreased by 20.5% in 2009 to $1,978.7 million (2008: $2,489.4 million). See “Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for additional important disclosures regarding the use of net revenues. A significant portion of our business and managed AUM are based outside of the U.S. The income statements of foreign currency subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars, the reporting currency of the company, using average foreign exchange rates. Over the course of the year, the average U.S. dollar foreign exchange rate was stronger when compared to other currencies, primarily the Pound Sterling, Canadian dollar and Euro, which impacted our reported revenues for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. The impact of foreign exchange rate movements resulted in $152.0accounted for $18.0 million (22.3%(2.1%) of the declineincrease in operating revenues, and was 0.5% of total operating revenues, during the year ended December 31, 2010 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2009. Additionally, our revenues are directly influenced by the level and composition of our AUM as more fully discussed below. Movements in global capital market levels, net new business inflows (or outflows) and changes in the mix of investment products between asset classes and geographies may materially affect our revenues from period to period.

31


     As discussed in the company’s Form 10-Q filings for the June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2010 periods, the company acquired Morgan Stanley’s retail asset management business, including Van Kampen Investments (the “acquired business” or the “acquisition”) on June 1, 2010. The main categoriesacquisition had a significant impact on our results for the 2010 period. The operating results for the year ended December 31, 2010 include the operating results of the acquired business from the purchase date of June 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010. The integration of the acquired business is largely complete; as such, accurate segregated expense information for the acquired business is not available. Prior to any significant product mergers, revenues associated with the acquired business can be separately identified, and as a result, the dollarimpact can be estimated. Operating revenues of the acquired business for the year ended December 31, 2010 were approximately $468 million, which represents the incremental impact of the acquired business and percentage change betweendoes not represent the periods, are as follows:stand-alone results of the acquired business.
                 
$ in millions 2009 2008 $ Change %Change
Investment management fees  2,120.2   2,617.8   (497.6)  (19.0)%
Service and distribution fees  412.6   512.5   (99.9)  (19.5)%
Performance fees  30.0   75.1   (45.1)  (60.1)%
Other  64.5   102.2   (37.7)  (36.9)%
                 
Total operating revenues  2,627.3   3,307.6   (680.3)  (20.6)%
Third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses  (693.4)  (875.5)  182.1   (20.8)%
Proportional share of revenues, net of third-party distribution expenses, from joint venture investments  44.8   57.3   (12.5)  (21.8)%
                 
Net revenues  1,978.7   2,489.4   (510.7)  (20.5)%
                 
Investment Management Fees
     Investment management fees are derived from providing professional services to manage client accounts and include fees earned from retail mutual funds, unit trusts, investment companies with variable capital (ICVCs), exchange-traded funds, investment trusts and institutional and private wealth management advisory contracts. Investment management fees for products offered in the retail distribution channel are generally calculated as a percentage of the daily average asset balances and therefore vary as the levels of AUM change resulting from inflows, outflows and market movements. Investment management fees for products offered in the institutional and private wealth management distribution channels are calculated in accordance with the underlying investment management contracts and also vary over contractually determined periods in relation to the level of client assets managed.
     Investment management fees decreased 19.0%increased by $600.7 million (28.3%) in 2009the year ended December 31, 2010, to $2,120.2$2,720.9 million (2008: $2,617.8(year ended December 31, 2009: $2,120.2 million) due to decreasesthe acquisition, increases in average AUM, during the year,primarily retail AUM, changes in the mix of AUM between various asset classes and foreign exchange rate movements. Average AUM formovement. The acquisition contributed to the increase in investment management fees with an estimated $257 million in these fees during the year ended December 31, 2009, were $388.7 billion (2008: $440.6 billion), a decrease of 11.8%.2010. Average long-term AUM, which generally earn higher fee rates than institutional money market AUM, increased 41.0% to $463.5 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 from $328.8 billion for the year ended December 31, 2009, were $301.7 billion, a decrease of 16.4% from $360.8while average institutional money market AUM decreased 20.9% to $68.8 billion for the year ended December 31, 2008, while average institutional money market AUM increased 9.0% to2010 from $87.0 billion at December 31, 2009, from $79.8 billion for the year ended December 31, 2008.2009. The increase in average

39


long-term AUM includes the impact of the acquired business. See the company’s disclosures regarding the changes in AUM during the year ended December 31, 2010 in the “Assets Under Management” section above for additional information regarding the movements in AUM. Foreign exchange rate movements led to an increase in investment management fees of $17.0 million (2.8%) during the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2009.
     Additionally, the change in investment management fee revenues reflects the adoption of guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 810 on January 1, 2010. As part of the consolidation, management fees earned from consolidated CLOs and other products of $45.3 million were eliminated from the company’s operating revenues for the year ended December 31, 2010. In accordance with the standard, prior periods have not been restated to reflect the consolidation of these CLOs. The company uses a non-GAAP financial measure, net revenues, to add back these eliminated management fees as part of net revenues, as the company has earned them for providing investment management services to the consolidated investment products. See “Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for the reconciliation of operating revenues to net revenues.
Service and Distribution Fees
     Service fees are generated through fees charged to cover several types of expenses, including fund accounting fees and other maintenance costs for mutual funds, unit trusts and ICVCs, and administrative fees earned from closed-ended funds. Service fees also include transfer agent fees, which are fees charged to cover the expense of processing client share purchases and redemptions, call center support and client reporting. U.S. distribution fees can include 12b-1 fees earned from certain mutual funds to cover allowable sales and marketing expenses for those funds and also include asset-based sales charges paid by certain mutual funds for a period of time after the sale of those funds. Distribution fees typically vary in relation to the amount of client assets managed. Generally, retail products offered outside of the U.S. do not generate a separate distribution fee, as the quoted management fee rate is inclusive of these services.
     In 2009,2010, service and distribution fees decreased 19.5%increased by $232.9 million (56.4%) to $645.5 million (year ended December 31, 2009: $412.6 million). The acquisition contributed an estimated $172 million (2008: $512.5 million) primarily due to decreases in average AUM duringof the year. Included in the declineincrease in service and distribution fees in the three monthsyear ended December 31, 2009, was a reduction of $5.4 million reflecting2010. The remaining increase is largely attributable to the full-year impact of a reductionincrease in transfer agency and administrative revenues in Canada, as certain fund expense recovery limits were reached.average AUM during the year.
Performance Fees
     Performance fee revenues are generated on certain management contracts when performance hurdles are achieved. Such fee revenues are recorded in operating revenues as of the performance measurement date, when the contractual performance criteria have been met and when the outcome of the transaction can be measured reliably in accordance with Method 1 of ASC Topic 605-20-S99, “Revenue Recognition — Services — SEC Materials.” Cash receipt of earned performance fees occurs after the measurement date. The performance measurement date is defined in each contract in which incentive and performance fee revenue agreements are in effect, and therefore weeffect. We have performance fee arrangements that include monthly, quarterly and annual measurement dates. Given the uniqueness of each transaction, performance fee contracts are evaluated on an individual basis to determine if revenues can and should be recognized. Performance fees are not recorded if there are any future performance contingencies. If performance

32


arrangements require repayment of the performance fee for failure to perform during the contractual period, then performance fee revenues are recognized no earlier than the expiration date of these terms. Performance fees will fluctuate from period to period and may not correlate with general market changes, since most of the fees are driven by relative performance to the respective benchmark rather than by absolute performance. Additionally, ofOf our $423.1$616.5 billion in AUM at December 31, 2009,2010, only approximately $30.0$36.8 billion, or 7.1%5.9%, could potentially earn performance fees. Of the $114.6 billion AUM acquired on June 1, 2010 through the acquisition, $2.7 billion, or 2.4%, are eligible to earn performance fees.
     In 2009,the year ended December 31, 2010, performance fees decreased 60.1%by $3.9 million (13.0%) to $26.1 million (year ended December 31, 2009: $30.0 million (2008: $75.1million). The performance fees generated in 2010 arose primarily due to products managed by the European Real Estate group ($4.3 million), Invesco Perpetual ($3.4 million), and Atlantic Trust ($11.8 million). The performance fees generated in 2009 arose primarily due to products managed by the Invesco Global Strategies group ($2.4 million), Invesco Perpetual ($13.4 million), and Atlantic Trust ($5.7 million). The performance fees generated in 2008 arose primarily due to products managed by the Invesco Global Strategies ($22.3 million) and Real Estate ($14.5 million) groups, as well as by Invesco Perpetual ($21.1 million).
Other Revenues
     Other revenues include fees derived primarily from our UIT operations, transaction commissions earned upon the sale of new investments into certain of our funds, and fees earned upon the completion of transactions in our direct real estate and private equity asset groups. Real estate transaction fees are derived from commissions earned through the buying and selling of properties. Private equity

40


transaction fees include commissions associated with the restructuring of, and fees from providing advice to, portfolio companies held by the funds. These transaction fees are recorded in our financial statements on the date when the transactions are legally closed. Other revenues also include the revenues of consolidated investment products.
     Following the acquisition, the company is the sponsor of UITs. In 2009,its capacity as sponsor of UITs, the company earns other revenues decreased 36.9%related to transactional sales charges resulting from the sale of UIT products and from the difference between the purchase or bid and offer price of securities temporarily held to form new UIT products. These revenues are recorded as other revenues net of concessions to dealers who distribute UITs to investors.
     In the year ended December 31, 2010, other revenues increased by $30.7 million (47.6%) to $95.2 million (year ended December 31, 2009: $64.5 million). Increases in other revenues included $38.9 million (2008: $102.2 million), drivenin UIT revenues during the year, a result of the acquired business, and higher real estate acquisition and disposition fees of $2.4 million which were offset by decreasesa $5.2 million decline in transaction commissions, due to the tightening of the credit markets and fewer real estate transactions, and foreign exchange rate movements.commissions.
Third-Party Distribution, Service and Advisory Expenses
     Third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses include periodic “renewal” commissions paid to brokers and independent financial advisors for their continuing oversight of their clients’ assets, over the time they are invested, and are payments for the servicing of client accounts. Renewal commissions are calculated based upon a percentage of the AUM value. Third-party distribution expenses also include the amortization of upfront commissions paid to broker-dealers for sales of fund shares with a contingent deferred sales charge (a charge levied to the investor for client redemption of AUM within a certain contracted period of time). The distribution commissions are amortized over the redemption period. Also included in third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses are sub-transfer agency fees that are paid to third parties for processing client share purchases and redemptions, call center support and client reporting. Third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses may increase or decrease at a rate different from the rate of change in service and distribution fee revenues due to the inclusion of distribution, service and advisory expenses for the U.K. and Canada, where the related revenues are recorded as investment management fee revenues, as noted above.
     Third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses decreased 20.8%increased by $279.3 million (40.3%) in 2009the year ended December 31, 2010 to $972.7 million (year ended December 31, 2009: $693.4 million (2008: $875.5 million), which is consistent with the declinesincrease in investment management and service and distribution fee revenues. Foreign exchange rate movements increased third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses by $5.3 million (1.9%) during the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2009.
Proportional share of revenues, net of third-party distribution expenses, from joint venture investments
     Management believes that the addition of our proportional share of revenues, net of third-party distribution expenses, from joint venture arrangements should be added to operating revenues to arrive at net revenues, as it is important to evaluate the contribution to the business that our joint venture arrangements are making. See “Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for additional disclosures regarding the use of net revenues. The company’s most significant joint venture arrangement is our 49.0% investment in Invesco Great Wall Fund Management Company Limited (the “Invesco Great Wall” joint venture).
     The 5.6% decrease in our proportional share of revenues, net of third-party distribution expenses, to $42.2 million in 2010 (year ended December 31, 2009: $44.7 million), is driven by the decline in average AUM of the Invesco Great Wall joint venture. Our share of the Invesco Great Wall joint venture’s average AUM for the year ended December 31, 2010, was $3.6 billion, a 2.7% decline in average AUM from $3.7 billion for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Management fees earned from consolidated investment products
     Management believes that the consolidation of investment products may impact a reader’s analysis of our underlying results of operations and could result in investor confusion or the production of information about the company by analysts or external credit rating agencies that is not reflective of the underlying results of operations and financial condition of the company. Accordingly, management believes that it is appropriate to adjust operating revenues for the impact of consolidated investment products in calculating net revenues. As management and performance fees earned by Invesco from the consolidated products are eliminated upon consolidation of the investment products, management believes that it is appropriate to add these operating revenues back in the calculation of net revenues. See “Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for additional disclosures regarding the use of net revenues.

41


     Management fees earned from consolidated investment products increased by $37.3 million to $45.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2010 (year ended December 31, 2009: $8.0 million). The increase reflects the adoption of guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 810 on January 1, 2010. CLO management fees of $35.4 million were eliminated from the company’s operating revenues for the year ended December 31, 2010. In accordance with the standard, prior periods have not been restated to reflect the consolidation of these CLOs.
Other revenues recorded by consolidated investment products
     Operating revenues of consolidated investment products are included in U.S. GAAP operating revenues resulting from the consolidation of investment products into the company’s results of operations. Management believes that this consolidation could impact a reader’s analysis of our underlying results of operations. Therefore, management believes that it is appropriate to deduct operating revenues of consolidated investment products in calculating net revenues. See “Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for additional disclosures regarding the use of net revenues.
Operating Expenses
     The main categories of operating expenses are as follows:
                 
$ in millions 2010 2009 $ Change % Change
Employee compensation  1,114.9   950.8   164.1   17.3%
Third-party distribution, service and advisory  972.7   693.4   279.3   40.3%
Marketing  159.6   108.9   50.7   46.6%
Property, office and technology  238.4   212.3   26.1   12.3%
General and administrative  262.2   166.8   95.4   57.2%
Transaction and integration  150.0   10.8   139.2   N/A 
                 
Total operating expenses  2,897.8   2,143.0   754.8   35.2%
                 
     The table below sets forth these expense categories as a percentage of total operating expenses and operating revenues, which we believe provides useful information as to the relative significance of each type of expense.
                         
      % of Total % of     % of Total % of
      Operating Operating     Operating Operating
$ in millions 2010 Expenses Revenues 2009 Expenses Revenues
Employee compensation  1,114.9   38.5%  32.0%  950.8   44.4%  36.2%
Third-party distribution, service and advisory  972.7   33.6%  27.9%  693.4   32.3%  26.4%
Marketing  159.6   5.5%  4.6%  108.9   5.1%  4.1%
Property, office and technology  238.4   8.2%  6.8%  212.3   9.9%  8.1%
General and administrative  262.2   9.0%  7.5%  166.8   7.8%  6.3%
Transaction and integration  150.0   5.2%  4.3%  10.8   0.5%  0.4%
                         
Total operating expenses  2,897.8   100.0%  83.1%  2,143.0   100.0%  81.5%
                         
     During 2010, operating expenses increased by $754.8 million (35.2%) to $2,897.8 million (year ended December 31, 2009: $2,143.0 million), reflecting increases in all cost categories from 2009 expense levels. As discussed above, the Morgan Stanley acquisition took place on June 1, 2010, which increased expenses across all categories. As the integration of the acquired business is largely complete, segregated expense data is not available.
     In addition to the acquired business, foreign exchange differences have a large impact on our expenses. A significant portion of our business and managed AUM are based outside of the U.S. The income statements of foreign currency subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars, the reporting currency of the company, using average foreign exchange rates. The impact of foreign exchange rate movements accounted for $13.2 million (1.7%) of the increase in operating expenses, and was 0.5% of total operating expenses, during the year ended December 31, 2010.
Employee Compensation
     Employee compensation includes salary, cash bonuses and share-based payment plans designed to attract and retain the highest caliber employees. Employee staff benefit plan costs and payroll taxes are also included in employee compensation.

42


     Employee compensation increased $164.1 million (17.3%) to $1,114.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2010 (year ended December 31, 2009: $950.8 million). Base salaries and variable compensation increased $114.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2010 from the year ended December 31, 2009 due to incremental costs associated with the acquisition, the impact of annual merit increases, and the increase in variable compensation accruals to reflect the overall earnings growth of the company, including improving operating results and sales. Included in compensation expenses during the year ended December 31, 2010 are share-based costs of $114.1 million compared to $90.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2009, also due to the incremental impact of the acquisition and to the additional amortization of share awards granted February 28, 2010 as part of the company’s annual share award cycle. Foreign exchange rate movement led to an increase in employee compensation expenses of $6.3 million (3.9%) in the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the year ended December 31, 2009. Additionally, employee compensation costs for the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 included $20.0 million of prepaid compensation amortization expenses related to the 2006 acquisition of W.L. Ross & Co. This acquisition-related asset will be fully amortized by the third quarter of 2011.
     Headcount at December 31, 2010 was 5,617 (year ended December 31, 2009: 4,890). The acquisition added 580 employees at June 1, 2010. Formal hiring of staff in our Hyderabad, India, facility commenced with 83 individuals becoming our employees in late 2010. An additional 474 individuals became our employees by the date of this Report.
Third-Party Distribution, Service and Advisory Expenses
     Third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses are discussed above in the operating and net revenues section.
Marketing
     Marketing expenses include marketing support payments, which are payments made to distributors of certain of our retail products over and above the 12b-1 distribution payments. These fees are calculated based on a percentage of assets and/or sales, will generally vary based on movements in the markets or actual sales, and are contracted separately with each distributor. Marketing expenses also include the cost of direct advertising of our products through trade publications, television and other media, and public relations costs, such as the marketing of the company’s products through conferences or other sponsorships, and the cost of marketing-related employee travel.
     Marketing expenses increased by $50.7 million (46.6%) in 2010 to $159.6 million (year ended December 31, 2009: $108.9 million) due primarily to the increase in marketing support payments of $37.4 million as compared to year ended December 31, 2009. Additionally, travel/client events and sales literature/research expenses increased $11.3 million and $4.3 million, respectively, during the year ended December 31, 2010 from the year ended December 31, 2009, offset by a decrease in advertising expenses of $3.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2009.
Property, Office and Technology
     Property, office and technology expenses include rent and utilities for our various leased facilities, depreciation of company-owned property and capitalized computer equipment costs, minor non-capitalized computer equipment and software purchases and related maintenance payments, and costs related to externally provided operations, technology, and other back office management services.
     Property, office and technology costs increased by $26.1 million (12.3%) to $238.4 million in 2010 from $212.3 million in 2009. Increases in property, office and technology costs include increases in outsourced administration expense and depreciation expense of $14.7 million and $7.1 million, respectively, along with other additional costs resulting from the acquisition.
General and Administrative
     General and administrative expenses include professional services costs, such as information service subscriptions, consulting fees, professional insurance costs, audit, tax and legal fees, non-marketing related employee travel expenditures, recruitment and training costs, and the amortization of certain intangible assets.

43


     General and administrative expenses increased by $95.4 million (57.2%) to $262.2 million in 2010 from $166.8 million in 2009, due to several factors, including an increase in amortization of certain intangible assets related to the acquisition of $18.0 million, a charge recorded in the three months ended December 31, 2010, relating to a levy from the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme of $15.3 million to cover claims resulting from failures of non-affiliated investment firms, a charge representing reimbursement costs from the correction of historical foreign exchange allocations in the fund accounting process that impacted the reporting of fund performance of certain funds of $8.9 million, an increase in non-marketing travel and entertainment costs of $10.4 million and an increase in market information services of $10.1 million for increased services across the business. Additionally, general and administrative expenses increased in 2010 from 2009 due to an insurance recovery received in 2009 related to legal costs associated with the market-timing regulatory settlement which offset 2009 expenses by $9.5 million.
Transaction and integration
     Transaction and integration expenses include acquisition-related charges incurred during the period to effect a business combination, including legal, regulatory, advisory, valuation, integration-related employee incentive awards and other professional or consulting fees, general and administrative costs, including travel costs related to the transaction and the costs of temporary staff involved in executing the transaction, and post-closing costs of integrating the acquired business into the company’s existing operations. Additionally, transaction and integration expenses include legal costs related to the defense of auction rate preferred securities complaints raised in the pre-acquisition period with respect to various closed-end funds included in the acquisition. See Item 3, “Legal Proceedings” for additional information.
     Transaction and integration charges were $150.0 million in 2010, as compared to $10.8 million in 2009 ($26.7 million of these costs were recorded in the three months ended December 31, 2010) and relate primarily to the acquisition of Morgan Stanley’s retail asset management business, including Van Kampen Investments. The acquisition was announced in October 2009 and closed on June 1, 2010. Transaction and integration charges incurred during the year ended December 31, 2010 include $39.1 million of staff costs, $53.4 million of technology contractor and related costs, and $57.5 million of professional services, principally legal, proxy solicitation, consultancy and insurance.
Operating Income, Adjusted Operating Income, Operating Margin and Adjusted Operating Margin
     Operating income increased 21.8% to $589.9 million in 2010 from $484.3 million in 2009, driven by the increase in operating revenues from increased AUM. Operating margin (operating income divided by operating revenues) was 16.9% in 2010, down from 18.4% in 2009. Adjusted operating margin increased to 34.5% in 2010 from 28.5% in 2009. See “Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for a reconciliation of operating revenues to net revenues, a reconciliation of operating income to adjusted operating income and additional important disclosures regarding net revenues, adjusted operating income and adjusted operating margin.
Other Income and Expenses
     The main categories of other income and expenses, and the dollar and percentage changes between periods are as follows:
                 
  Year ended    
  December 31,    
$ in millions 2010 2009 $ Change % Change
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates  40.2   27.0   13.2   48.9%
Interest and dividend income  10.4   9.8   0.6   6.1%
Interest income of consolidated investment products  240.9      240.9   N/A 
Gains/(losses) of consolidated investment products, net  114.0   (106.9)  220.9   N/A 
Interest expense  (58.6)  (64.5)  5.9   9.1%
Interest expense of consolidated investment products  (118.6)     (118.6)  N/A 
Other gains and losses, net  15.6   7.8   7.8   100.0%
                 
Total other income and expenses  243.9   (126.8)  370.7   N/A 
                 

44


Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
     Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates increased by $13.2 million (48.9%) to $40.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2010 (year ended December 31, 2009: $27.0 million). Included in equity in earnings from affiliates is our share of the income from our joint ventures in China, which declined by $5.5 million to $23.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2010 from $29.4 million earned during the year ended December 31, 2009. Declines in equity in earnings from our joint ventures are due to declines in average AUM in those entities during the year. Earnings from our affiliate in Poland also decreased by $1.1 million to $1.1 million in year ended December 31, 2010 from $2.2 million earned in the year ended December 31, 2009. These declines were more than offset by our share of the market-driven valuation changes in the underlying holdings of certain partnership investments which increased by $19.6 million to $15.1 million earned in the year ended December 31, 2010 from $4.5 million of losses during the year ended December 31, 2009.
Interest and dividend income and interest expense
     Interest and dividend income increased by $0.6 million (6.1%) to $10.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2010 (year ended December 31, 2009: $9.8 million). The year ended December 31, 2010 includes dividend income of $2.7 million on investments held to hedge economically deferred compensation plans. This dividend income is passed through to employee participants in the deferred compensation plans. See “Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for additional details. Higher yields during the year ended December 31, 2010 offset lower average cash and cash equivalent balances. Interest expense decreased by $5.9 million (9.1%) to $58.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2010 (year ended December 31, 2009: $64.5 million). Higher average debt balances were more than offset by lower average cost of debt during the year ended December 31, 2010 following the restructuring of our debt versus the comparative period.
Interest income and interest expense of consolidated investment products
     Interest income of consolidated investment products results from interest generated by the collateral assets held by consolidated CLOs, which is used to satisfy the interest expenses of the notes issued by the consolidated CLOs and other CLO operating expense requirements, including the payment of the management and performance fees to the company as investment manager. See Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 20, “Consolidated Investment Products,” for additional details.
     In the year ended December 31, 2010, interest income and interest expense of consolidated investment products were $240.9 million and $118.6 million, respectively. The balances reflect the adoption of guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 810 on January 1, 2010. In accordance with the standard, prior periods have not been restated to reflect the consolidation.
Gains and losses of consolidated investment products, net income impact of consolidated investment products, and noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities
     Included in other income and expenses are gains and losses of consolidated investment products, net, which are driven by realized and unrealized gains and losses of underlying investments held by consolidated investment products. In the year ended December 31, 2010 other gains and losses of consolidated investment products were a net gain of $114.0 million, as compared to a net loss of $106.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2009. The net gain in the period is primarily due to changes in market values of investments held by consolidated private equity funds.
     As illustrated in the Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income for the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 at the beginning of this Results of Operations section, the consolidation of investment products during the year ended December 31, 2010 resulted in an increase to net income of $180.7 million before attribution to noncontrolling interests. Invesco invests in only a portion of these products, and as a result this net gain is offset by noncontrolling interests of $170.9 million, resulting in a net increase in net income of the company of $9.8 million. Consolidated investment products had no material net income impact to the company for the year ended December 31, 2009.
     Noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities represent the profit or loss amounts attributed to third party investors in consolidated investment products. Movements in amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities on the company’s Consolidated Statements of Income generally offset the gains and losses, interest income and interest expense of consolidated investment products.

45


Other gains and losses, net
     Other gains and losses, net were a net gain of $15.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to a net gain of $7.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2009. Included in other gains and losses is a net gain of $14.2 million as a result of the appreciation of assets held for our deferred compensation plans (year ended December 31, 2009: none), together with $9.2 million of net realized gains from seed investments (year ended December 31, 2009: $3.7 million net realized gains). The 2010 other gains and losses also included $6.6 million in other-than-temporary impairment charges related to other seed money in affiliated funds (year ended December 31, 2009: $3.0 million) and $0.4 million in other-than-temporary impairment charges related to the valuations of investments in certain of our CLO products (year ended December 31, 2009: $5.2 million). In the year ended December 31, 2010, we incurred $0.2 million in net foreign exchange losses (year ended December 31, 2009: $8.4 million in net foreign exchange gains) on the revaluation of intercompany foreign currency denominated loans into the various functional currencies of our subsidiaries. In addition, included in the 2009 net gain is a gross gain generated upon a debt tender offer of $4.3 million ($3.3 million net of related expenses).
Income Tax Expense
     Our subsidiaries operate in several taxing jurisdictions around the world, each with its own statutory income tax rate. As a result, our effective tax rate will vary from year to year depending on the mix of the profits and losses of our subsidiaries. The majority of our profits are earned in the U.S., Canada and the U.K. The current U.K. statutory tax rate is 28%, the Canadian statutory tax rate is 31% and the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate is 35%.
     On December 14, 2007, legislation was enacted to reduce the Canadian income tax rate over five years, which changed the rate to 33.5% in 2008 and 33.0% in 2009. The legislation was revised in December 2009, further reducing the rate to 31.0% in 2010, 28.25% in 2011, 26.25% in 2012, 25.5% in 2013, and 25% thereafter. On July 27, 2010, legislation was introduced to reduce the UK income tax rate to 27% on April 1, 2011. Further reductions to the rate are proposed to reduce the rate by 1% per year to 24% by April 1, 2014. These reductions are expected to be introduced in future Finance Bills for each annual reduction.
     Our effective tax rate, excluding noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities, for 2010 was 29.7%, down from 31.5% for 2009. The rate decrease was primarily due to the mix of pre-tax income and favorable adjustments to reconcile our tax provisions to reflect actual tax returns filed. The rate decrease was partially offset by non-deductible transaction and integration costs related to the acquired business and a smaller benefit from the release of provisions for uncertain tax positions in 2010 versus 2009.
     The inclusion of income from noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities decreased our effective tax rate to 23.6% in 2010 and increased it to 41.5% in 2009. The 2009 rate was higher than 2008 due to a larger impact from losses in non-controlling interests.

46


Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2009, compared with the Year Ended December 31, 2008
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income
                 
      Consolidated    
  Before Investment    
$ in millions Consolidation(1) Products(2) Adjustments(3) Total
Year ended December 31, 2009
                
Total operating revenues  2,633.3   1.9   (7.9)  2,627.3 
Total operating expenses  (2,139.5)  (11.4)  7.9   (2,143.0)
                 
Operating income  493.8   (9.5)     484.3 
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates  24.5      2.5   27.0 
Interest and dividend income  9.8         9.8 
Other investment income/(losses)  7.8   (106.9)     (99.1)
Interest expense  (64.5)        (64.5)
                 
Income before income taxes, including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests  471.4   (116.4)  2.5   357.5 
Income tax provision  (148.2)        (148.2)
                 
Net income, including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests  323.2   (116.4)  2.5   209.3 
(Gains)/losses attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities, net  (0.7)  113.9      113.2 
                 
Net income attributable to common shareholders  322.5   (2.5)  2.5   322.5 
                 
                 
      Consolidated    
  Before Investment    
$ in millions Consolidation(1) Products(2) Adjustments(3) Total
Year ended December 31, 2008
                
Total operating revenues  3,308.4   5.5   (6.3)  3,307.6 
Total operating expenses  (2,555.3)  (10.8)  6.3   (2,559.8)
                 
Operating income  753.1   (5.3)     747.8 
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates  45.9      0.9   46.8 
Interest and dividend income  37.2         37.2 
Other investment income/(losses)  (39.9)  (58.0)     (97.9)
Interest expense  (76.9)  0      (76.9)
                 
Income/(loss) before income taxes, including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests  719.4   (63.3)  0.9   675.0 
Income tax provision  (236.0)        (236.0)
                 
Net income/(loss), including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests  483.4   (63.3)  0.9   421.0 
(Gains)/losses attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities, net  (1.7)  62.4      60.7 
                 
Net income attributable to common shareholders  481.7   (0.9)  0.9   481.7 
                 
(1)The Before Consolidation column includes Invesco’s equity interest in the investment products, accounted for as equity method and available-for-sale investments and does not include any other adjustments related to non-GAAP financial measure presentation.
(2)The company adopted guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 810, “Consolidation,” on January 1, 2010, resulting in the consolidation of certain CLOs. In accordance with the standard, prior periods have not been restated to reflect the consolidation of these CLOs. Prior to January 1, 2010, the company was not deemed to be the primary beneficiary of these CLOs.
(3)Adjustments include the elimination of intercompany transactions between the company and its consolidated investment products, primarily the elimination of management fees expensed by the funds and recorded as operating revenues (before consolidation) by the company.

47


Operating Revenues and Net Revenues
     The main categories of revenues, and the dollar and percentage change between the periods, were as follows:
                 
  Year ended    
  December 31,    
$ in millions 2009 2008 $ Change % Change
Investment management fees  2,120.2   2,617.8   (497.6)  (19.0)%
Service and distribution fees  412.6   512.5   (99.9)  (19.5)%
Performance fees  30.0   75.1   (45.1)  (60.1)%
Other  64.5   102.2   (37.7)  (36.9)%
                 
Total operating revenues  2,627.3   3,307.6   (680.3)  (20.6)%
Third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses  (693.4)  (875.5)  182.1   (20.8)%
Proportional share of revenues, net of third-party distribution expenses, from joint venture investments  44.7   57.3   (12.6)  (22.0)%
Management fees earned from consolidated investment products  8.0   6.2   1.8   29.0%
Other revenues recorded by consolidated investment products  (2.0)  (5.4)  3.4   (63.0)%
                 
Net revenues  1,984.6   2,490.2   (505.6)  (20.3)%
                 
     Operating revenues decreased by 20.6% in 2009 to $2,627.3 million (2008: $3,307.6 million). Net revenues decreased by 20.3% in 2009 to $1,984.6 million (2008: $2,490.6 million). Net revenues are operating revenues less third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses, plus our proportional share of net revenues from joint venture arrangements, plus management fees earned from, less other revenue recorded by, consolidated investment products. See “Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for additional important disclosures regarding the use of net revenues. A significant portion of our business and managed AUM are based outside of the U.S. The income statements of foreign currency subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars, the reporting currency of the company, using average foreign exchange rates. The impact of foreign exchange rate movements accounted for $152.0 million (22.3%) of the decline in operating revenues during the year ended December 31, 2009. Additionally, our revenues are directly influenced by the level and composition of our AUM as more fully discussed in “Assets Under Management.” Movements in global capital market levels, net new business inflows (or outflows) and changes in the mix of investment products between asset classes and geographies may materially affect our revenues from period to period.
Investment Management Fees
     Investment management fees decreased by $497.6 million (19.0%) in the year ended December 31, 2009, to $2,120.2 million (year ended December 31, 2008: $2,617.8 million) due a decrease in average AUM, changes in the mix of AUM between asset classes, and the impact of foreign exchange rate movement. Average AUM for the year ended December 31, 2009 were $415.8 billion, down $53.1 billion (11.3%) from $468.9 billion for 2008. Average long-term AUM, which generally earn higher fee rates than money market AUM, for the year ended December 31, 2009 decreased 25.4% to $328.8 billion from $440.6 billion for the year ended December 31, 2008, while average institutional money market AUM decreased 3.1% to $87.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2009, from $79.8 billion for the year ended December 31, 2008. See the company’s disclosures regarding the changes in AUM during the year ended December 31, 2009 in the “Assets Under Management” section above for additional information regarding the movements in AUM. Foreign exchange rate movements led to a decrease in investment management fees of $124.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the year ended December 31, 2008.
Service and Distribution Fees
     In 2009, service and distribution fees decreased 19.5% to $412.6 million (2008: $512.5 million) primarily due to decreases in average AUM during the year. Included in the decline in service and distribution fees in the three months ended December 31, 2009, was a reduction of $5.4 million reflecting the full-year impact of a reduction in transfer agency and administrative revenues in Canada, as certain fund expense recovery limits were reached.
Performance Fees
     Of our $459.5 billion in AUM at December 31, 2009, only approximately $30.0 billion, or 6.5%, could potentially earn performance fees. In 2009, performance fees decreased 60.1% to $30.0 million (2008: $75.1 million). The performance fees generated in 2009 arose primarily due to products managed by the Invesco Global Strategies group ($2.4 million), Invesco Perpetual ($13.4 million), and Atlantic Trust ($5.7 million). The performance fees generated in 2008 arose primarily due to products managed by the Invesco Global Strategies ($22.3 million) and Real Estate ($14.5 million) groups, as well as by Invesco Perpetual ($21.1 million).

48


Other Revenues
     In 2009, other revenues decreased 36.9% to $64.5 million (2008: $102.2 million), driven by decreases in transaction commissions of $17.7 million, due to the tightening of the credit markets and fewer real estate transactions, and foreign exchange rate movements $0.5 million.
Third-Party Distribution, Service and Advisory Expenses
     Third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses decreased 20.8% in 2009 to $693.4 million (2008: $875.5 million), consistent with the declines in investment management and service and distribution fee revenues.
Proportional share of revenues, net of third-party distribution expenses, from joint venture investments
     The 21.8% decrease in our proportional share of revenues, net of third-party distribution expenses, to $44.8 million in 2009 (2008: $57.3 million), is driven by the declines in average AUM of the Invesco Great Wall joint venture. Our share of the Invesco Great Wall joint venture’s average AUM at December 31, 2009, was $3.7 billion, a 17.8% decline in average AUM from $4.5 billion at December 31, 2008.

33


Operating Expenses
     The main categories of operating expenses are as follows:
                 
$ in millions 2009 2008 $ Change % Change
Employee compensation  950.8   1,055.8   (105.0)  (9.9)%
Third-party distribution, service and advisory  693.4   875.5   (182.1)  (20.8)%
Marketing  108.9   148.2   (39.3)  (26.5)%
Property, office and technology  212.3   214.3   (2.0)  (0.9)%
General and administrative  166.8   266.0   (99.2)  (37.3)%
Transaction and integration  10.8      10.8   N/A 
                 
Total operating expenses  2,143.0   2,559.8   (416.8)  (16.3)%
                 
     The table below sets forth these expense categories as a percentage of total operating expenses and operating revenues, which we believe provides useful information as to the relative significance of each type of expense.
                         
      % of Total % of     % of Total % of
      Operating Operating     Operating Operating
$ in millions 2009 Expenses Revenues 2008 Expenses Revenues
Employee compensation  950.8   44.4%  36.2%  1,055.8   41.2%  31.9%
Third-party distribution, service and advisory  693.4   32.3%  26.4%  875.5   34.2%  26.5%
Marketing  108.9   5.1%  4.1%  148.2   5.8%  4.5%
Property, office and technology  212.3   9.9%  8.1%  214.3   8.4%  6.5%
General and administrative  166.8   7.8%  6.3%  266.0   10.4%  8.0%
Transaction and integration  10.8   0.5%  0.4%         
                         
Total operating expenses  2,143.0   100.0%  81.5%  2,559.8   100.0%  77.4%
                         
     During 2009, operating expenses decreased 16.3% to $2,143.0 million (2008: $2,559.8 million), reflecting declines in all cost categories from 2008 expense levels. As discussed above, a significant portion of our business and managed AUM are based outside of the U.S. The income statements of foreign currency subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars, the reporting currency of the company, using average foreign exchange rates. Over the course of the year, the average U.S. dollar foreign exchange rate was stronger when compared to other currencies, primarily the Pound Sterling, Canadian dollar and Euro, which impacted our reported expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. The impact of foreign exchange rate movements resulted inaccounted for $108.0 million (25.9%) of the decline in operating expenses during the year ended December 31, 2009. Additionally, operating expenses were lower in 2009 as compared to 2008 reflecting the impact of general cost containment measures and costs that move in line with revenues.

49


     The main categories of operating expenses are as follows:
                 
$ in millions 2009 2008 $ Change % Change
Employee compensation  950.8   1,055.8   (105.0)  (9.9)%
Third-party distribution, service and advisory  693.4   875.5   (182.1)  (20.8)%
Marketing  108.9   148.2   (39.3)  (26.5)%
Property, office and technology  212.3   214.3   (2.0)  (0.9)%
General and administrative  166.8   266.0   (99.2)  (37.3)%
Transaction and integration  10.8      10.8   N/A 
                 
Total operating expenses  2,143.0   2,559.8   (416.8)  (16.3)%
                 
     The table below sets forth these expense categories as a percentage of total operating expenses and operating revenues, which we believe provides useful information as to the relative significance of each type of expense.
                         
      % of Total % of     % of Total % of
      Operating Operating     Operating Operating
$ in millions 2009 Expenses Revenues 2008 Expenses Revenues
Employee compensation  950.8   44.4%  36.2%  1,055.8   41.2%  31.9%
Third-party distribution, service and advisory  693.4   32.3%  26.4%  875.5   34.2%  26.5%
Marketing  108.9   5.1%  4.1%  148.2   5.8%  4.5%
Property, office and technology  212.3   9.9%  8.1%  214.3   8.4%  6.5%
General and administrative  166.8   7.8%  6.3%  266.0   10.4%  8.0%
Transaction and integration  10.8   0.5%  0.4%         
                         
Total operating expenses  2,143.0   100.0%  81.5%  2,559.8   100.0%  77.4%
                         
Employee Compensation
     Employee compensation includes salary, cash bonuses and share-based payment plans designed to attract and retain the highest caliber employees. Employee staff benefit plan costs and payroll taxes are also included in employee compensation.
     Employee compensation decreased $105.0 million, or 9.9%, in 2009 from 2008 due predominantly to overall decreases in base salaries and variable compensation of $86.3 million, including decreases in discretionary and investment performance-based staff bonuses, decreases in base salary costs resulting from decreases in headcount, and foreign exchange rate movements.movements of $36.4 million. Headcount declined 8.2% to 4,890 at December 31, 2009 from 5,325 at December 31, 2008. Included in compensation expenses during the year ended December 31, 2009 are share-based payment costs of $90.8 million, compared to $97.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2008. Additionally, employee compensation costs for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 included $20.0 million of prepaid compensation amortization expenses related to the 2006 acquisition of W.L. Ross & Co. This expense amortization will continue through 2010, and the acquisition-related asset will be fully amortized by the third quarter of 2011.
     Compensation expenses in the three months ended December 31, 2009, included a $4.1 million increase in pension costs related to the plans’ actuarial annual valuation updates and a $4.3 million increase in payroll taxes associated with the vesting of share-based payment awards.

34


Third-Party Distribution, Service and Advisory Expenses
     Third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses are discussed above in the operating and net revenues section.
Marketing
     Marketing expenses include marketing support payments, which are payments made to distributors of certain of our retail products over and above the 12b-1 distribution payments. These fees are contracted separately with each distributor. Marketing expenses also include the cost of direct advertising of our products through trade publications, television and other media, and public relations costs, such as the marketing of the company’s products through conferences or other sponsorships, and the cost of marketing-related employee travel.
     Marketing expenses decreased 26.5% in 2009 to $108.9 million (2008: $148.2 million) due to decreaseda decrease in marketing support payments of $12.2 million related to the decline in average AUM in the U.S., a lower level of advertising of $7.7 million, and a reduction in marketing-related travel costs.travel/client events and sales literature/research expenses of $8.8 million and $2.8 million, respectively. Additionally, foreign exchange rate movement decreased marketing expenses by $4.5 million (11.5%) for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008.
Property, Office and Technology
     Property, office and technology expenses include rent and utilities for our various leased facilities, depreciation of company-owned property and capitalized computer equipment costs, minor non-capitalized computer equipment and software purchases and related maintenance payments, and costs related to externally provided operations, technology, and other back office management services.
     Property, office and technology costs decreased 0.9% to $212.3 million in 2009 from $214.3 million in 2008. Decreases in technology costs resulting from general disciplined expense management measures and foreign exchange rate movement were offset by increases in property and office costs during the year. Property and office expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009, included $12.0 million in charges relating to vacating leased property, including our Denver, Colorado, operations facility. Property and office expenses during 2008 included a $5.1 million rent charge related to vacating leased property, offset by downward adjustments in rent costs for sublet office property of $8.2 million. Property, office and technology costs increased in the three months ended December 31, 2009, primarily due to the outsourcing of facilities management in North America and the significant growth of the Hyderabad, India, facility.
General and Administrative
     General and administrative expenses include professional services costs, such as information service subscriptions, consulting fees, professional insurance costs, audit, tax and legal fees, non-marketing related employee travel expenditures, recruitment and training costs, and the amortization of certain intangible assets.
     General and administrative expenses decreased by $99.2 million (37.3%) to $166.8 million in 2009 from $266.0 million in 2008, due to several factors includinga focus on expense reduction and management during 2009. During 2009, the most significant decrease in this area was a decrease of $50.2 million in professional services expenses, which included an insurance recovery of $9.5 million related to legal costs associated with the market-timing regulatory settlement, foreign exchange rate movement, and generalsettlement. General disciplined expense management measures including reducedalso led to a reduction in travel and entertainment and professional services expenses recordedof $14.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2009.
Transaction and integration
     Transaction and integration expenses include acquisition-related charges incurred during the period to effect a business combination, including legal, regulatory, advisory, valuation, and other professional or consulting fees, Foreign exchange rate movement decreased general and administrative costs, including travel costs relatedexpenses by $6.9 million during 2009 as compared to the transaction2008.
Transaction and the costs of temporary staff involved in executing the transaction, and post-closing costs of integrating the acquired business into the company’s existing operations.Integration
     Transaction and integration charges were $10.8 million in 2009 ($9.8 million of these costs were recorded in the three months ended December 31, 2009) and relate to the pending acquisition of Morgan Stanley’s retail asset management business, including Van Kampen Investments. The acquisition was announced in October 2009 and is expected to close in mid-2010. These costs are currently estimated to be less than $175 million, including those costs incurred in 2009, and are expected to continue to be incurred during 2010-2011. At the time of the announcement of the transaction, theclosed on June 1, 2010. There were no transaction and integration costs were estimated to be approximately $125 million. One ofchanges for the largest anticipated post-closing expenses of integrating the acquired business into the company’s existing operations relates to the costs of proxy solicitation of fund shareholders. Our estimates of these charges could continue to increase as additional resources are devoted to obtaining the required votes as early as practicable before the end of the second quarter of 2010, as desired.year ended December 31, 2008.

35


Operating Income, NetAdjusted Operating Income, Operating Margin and NetAdjusted Operating Margin
     Operating income decreased 35.2% to $484.3 million in 2009 from $747.8 million in 2008, driven by the declines in operating revenues from reduced AUM. As a result of the decline in our operating revenues, the following measures have also declined in 2009:adjusted operating income, operating margin netand adjusted operating income, and net operating margin.margin also declined. Operating margin (operating income divided by operating revenues) was 18.4% in 2009, down from 22.6% in 2008. NetAdjusted operating income (operating income plus our proportional share of the operating income from joint venture arrangements)

50


decreased 34.9%31.5% to $512.7$565.6 million in 2009 from $787.5$826.1 million in 2008. NetAdjusted operating margin was 25.9%28.5% in 2009, down from 31.6%33.2% in 2008. Net operating margin is equal to net operating income divided by net revenues. Net revenues are equal to operating revenues less third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses, plus our proportional share of the net revenues from our joint venture arrangements. See “Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for a reconciliation of operating revenues to net revenues, a reconciliation of operating income to netadjusted operating income, and additional important disclosures regarding net revenues, netadjusted operating income and netadjusted operating margins.margin.
Other Income and Expenses
     The main categories of other income and expenses, and the dollar and percentage changes between periods are as follows:
                 
  Year ended    
  December 31,    
$ in millions 2009 2008 $ Change % Change
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates  27.0   46.8   (19.8)  (42.3)%
Interest and dividend income  9.8   37.2   (27.4)  (73.7)%
Gains/(losses) of consolidated investment products, net  (106.9)  (58.0)  (48.9)  84.3%
Interest expense  (64.5)  (76.9)  12.4   (16.1)%
Other gains and losses, net  7.8   (39.9)  47.7   N/A 
                 
Total other income and expenses  (126.8)  (90.8)  (36.0)  39.6%
                 
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
     Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates decreased by $19.8 million (42.3%) to $27.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2009 (December 31, 2008: $46.8 million), resultingdue primarily from declines in our share of the pre-tax earnings of our joint venture investments in China of $11.9 million, as well as, net losses in certain of our partnership investments.investments of $7.8 million.
Interest and dividend income and interest expense
     Interest and dividend income decreased 73.7%by $27.4 million to $9.8 million in 2009 from(2008: $37.2 million in 2008 due tomillion), as a result of the combination of lower interest rates and lower average cash and cash equivalents balances in 2009. The decrease in yields was consistent with the market movement from 2008 to 2009. Interest expense decreased 16.1% to $64.5 million in 2009 from $76.9 million in 2008 due to decreases in the average debt balance in 2009.
Gains and losses of consolidated investment products
     Included in other income and expenses are net realized and unrealized gains of consolidated investment products. In 2009, the net losses of consolidated investment products were $106.9 million, compared to net losses of $58.0 million in 2008, reflecting the changes in market values of the investments held by consolidated investment products. Invesco invests in only a small equity portion of these products, and as a result these losses are offset by noncontrolling interests of $113.2 million.
Other gains and losses, net
     Other gains and losses, net were a net gain of $7.8 million in 2009, compared to a net loss of $39.9 million in 2008. Included in the 2009 net gain is a gross gain generated upon thea debt tender offer of $4.3 million ($3.3 million net of related expenses) and net gaingains of $4.3 million realized upon the disposal of other investments (2008: $7.4 million gain on maturity of a CLO investment, offset by a loss of $4.1 million realized upon the disposal of a private equity investment). The 2009 net gain also included $5.2 million in other-than-temporary impairment charges related to the valuations of investments in certain of our CLO products (2008: $22.7 million) and $3.0 million in other-than-temporary impairment charges related to other seed money in affiliated funds (2008: $8.5 million). The CLO impairments arose principally from adverse changes in the timing of estimated cash flows used in the valuation models. In the year ended December 31, 2009, we also benefited from $8.4 million in net foreign exchange gains whereas in 2008, we incurred $13.0 million in net foreign exchange losses. See Item 8, “FinancialFinancial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 13, Other15, “Other Gains and Losses, Net,” for additional details related to other gains and losses.

51


     Included in other income and expenses are net realized and unrealized gains of consolidated investment products. In 2009, the net losses of consolidated investment products were $106.9 million, compared to net losses of $58.0 million in 2008, reflecting the changes in market values of the investments held by consolidated investment products. Invesco invests in only a small equity portion of these products, and as a result these losses are offset by noncontrolling interests of $113.9 million, resulting in a net impact to the company of $7.0 million.
Income Tax Expense
     Our subsidiaries operate in several taxing jurisdictions around the world, each with its own statutory income tax rate. As a result, our effective tax rate will vary from year to year depending on the mix of the profits and losses of our subsidiaries. The majority of our profits are earned in the U.S., Canada and the U.K. The current2009 U.K. statutory tax rate iswas 28%, the Canadian statutory tax rate iswas 33% and the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate iswas 35%. On December 14, 2007, legislation was enacted to reduce the Canadian income tax rate over five years, which changed the rate to 33.5% in 2008, 33.0% in 2009, 31% in 2010, 28.25% in 2011, 26.25% in 2012, 25.5% in 2013, and 25% thereafter.
     Our effective tax rate, excluding noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities, for 2009 was 31.5%, down from 32.9% for 2008. The rate decrease was primarily due to the mix of pre-tax income and a larger benefit from the release of provisions for uncertain tax positions in 2009 versus 2008. The rate decrease was partially offset by an increase in the net valuation allowance for subsidiary operating losses and additional state taxes.
     The inclusion of income from noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities increased our effective tax rate to 41.5% in 2009 and to 35.9% in 2008.

36


Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, The 2009 rate was higher than 2008 Compared with the Year Ended December 31, 2007
Operating Revenues and Net Revenues
     Operating revenues decreased by 14.7% in 2008 to $3,307.6 million (2007: $3,878.9 million). Net revenues are operating revenues less third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses, plus our proportional share of net revenues from joint venture arrangements. Net revenues decreased by 13.8% in 2008 to $2,489.4 million (2007: $2,888.4 million). See “Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for additional important disclosures regarding the use of net revenues.
     The main categories of revenues, and the dollar and percentage change between the periods, are as follows:
                 
$ in millions 2008 2007 $ Change % Change
Investment management fees  2,617.8   3,080.1   (462.3)  (15.0)%
Service and distribution fees  512.5   593.1   (80.6)  (13.6)%
Performance fees  75.1   70.3   4.8   6.8%
Other  102.2   135.4   (33.2)  (24.5)%
                 
Total operating revenues  3,307.6   3,878.9   (571.3)  (14.7)%
Third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses  (875.5)  (1,051.1)  175.6   (16.7)%
Proportional share of revenues, net of third-party distribution expenses, from joint venture investments  57.3   60.6   (3.3)  (5.4)%
                 
Net revenues  2,489.4   2,888.4   (399.0)  (13.8)%
                 
Investment Management Fees
     Investment management fees decreased 15.0% in 2008 to $2,617.8 million (2007: $3,080.1 million) due to decreasesa larger impact from losses in average AUM during the year and the mix of AUM between various asset classes. Average AUM for the year ended December 31, 2008, were $440.6 billion (2007: $489.1 billion), a decrease of 9.9%. Average long-term AUM, which generally earn higher fee rates than institutional money market AUM, for the year ended December 31, 2008, were $360.8 billion, a decrease of 14.9% from $424.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 2007, while average institutional money market AUM increased 23.0% to $79.8 billion at December 31, 2008, from $64.9 billion for the year ended December 31, 2007. In addition, our equity AUM as a percentage of total AUM fell from 49% at December 31, 2007, to 36% at December 31, 2008. This decline in equities within our asset mix was consistent with the decline in global equity markets.
Performance Fees
     In 2008, these fees increased 6.8% to $75.1 million (2007: $70.3 million). The performance fees generated in 2008 arose primarily in the Invesco Quantitative Strategies and Real Estate groups, as well as in the U.K.; whereas the performance fees generated in 2007 included amounts generated primarily in the U.K. and Asia.
Service and Distribution Fees
     In 2008, service and distribution fees decreased 13.6% to $512.5 million (2007: $593.1 million) primarily due to decreased retail AUM, offset by increases in institutional money market revenues resulting from the 23.0% increase in average institutional money market AUM during the year.
Other Revenues
     In 2008, other revenues decreased 24.5% to $102.2 million (2007: $135.4 million) driven by decreases in sales volumes of funds subject to front-end commissions, offset by higher transaction fees within our private equity business.
Third-Party Distribution, Service and Advisory Expenses
     Third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses decreased 16.7% in 2008 to $875.5 million (2007: $1,051.1 million), consistent with the declines in investment management and service and distribution fee revenues.

37


Proportional share of revenues, net of third-party distribution expenses, from joint venture investments
     The 5.4% decrease in our proportional share of revenues, net of third-party distribution expenses, to $57.3 million in 2008 (2007: $60.6 million), is driven by the declines in average AUM in the Invesco Great Wall joint venture. Our share of the Invesco Great Wall joint venture’s AUM at December 31, 2008, was $3.0 billion, a 58% decline in AUM from $7.1 billion at December 31, 2007, reflecting the increased volatility of equity markets in this region during the year.
Operating Expenses
     During 2008, operating expenses decreased 11.3% to $2,559.8 million (2007: $2,884.6 million), reflecting declines in all cost categories from 2007 expense levels.
     The main categories of operating expenses are as follows:
                 
$ in millions 2008 2007 $ Change % Change
Employee compensation  1,055.8   1,137.6   (81.8)  (7.2)%
Third-party distribution, service and advisory  875.5   1,051.1   (175.6)  (16.7)%
Marketing  148.2   157.6   (9.4)  (6.0)%
Property, office and technology  214.3   242.5   (28.2)  (11.6)%
General and administrative  266.0   295.8   (29.8)  (10.1)%
                 
Total operating expenses  2,559.8   2,884.6   (324.8)  (11.3)%
                 
     The table below sets forth these expense categories as a percentage of total operating expenses and operating revenues, which we believe provides useful information as to the relative significance of each type of expense.
                         
      % of Total % of     % of Total % of
      Operating Operating     Operating Operating
$ in millions 2008 Expenses Revenues 2007 Expenses Revenues
Employee compensation  1,055.8   41.2%  31.9%  1,137.6   39.4%  29.3%
Third-party distribution, service and advisory  875.5   34.2%  26.5%  1,051.1   36.4%  27.1%
Marketing  148.2   5.8%  4.5%  157.6   5.5%  4.1%
Property, office and technology  214.3   8.4%  6.5%  242.5   8.4%  6.3%
General and administrative  266.0   10.4%  8.0%  295.8   10.3%  7.6%
                         
Total operating expenses  2,559.8   100.0%  77.4%  2,884.6   100.0%  74.4%
                         
Employee Compensation
     Employee compensation decreased $81.8 million, or 7.2%, in 2008 from 2007 due predominantly to overall decreases in sales commissions and variable compensation. Offsetting these declines were increases in base salary expenses resulting from annual merit increases, which were effective March 1, 2008. Additionally, in the three months ended December 31, 2008, the company experienced increases in bonus expense tied to improved investment performance and performance fee revenues. These increases in bonus expense during the three months ended December 31, 2008, which incorporated recognition of a full year impact tied to investment performance improvements, were equally offset in the three months ended December 31, 2008, by the reversal of $18.8 million ($12.6 million, net of tax, or $0.5 per share) of cumulative share-based compensation charges related to performance-based share awards granted in 2007. The reversal was made because the company does not expect that the required performance targets for the vesting of these awards will be achieved. Of the charges reversed, $10.8 million was originally recorded in 2007, with the remainder originally recorded in the first nine months of 2008.
Third-Party Distribution, Service and Advisory Expenses
     Third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses are discussed above in the operating and net revenues section.
Marketing
     Marketing expenses decreased 6.0% in 2008 to $148.2 million (2007: $157.6 million) due to decreased marketing support payments related to decreased sales and AUM in the U.S., consistent with overall market declines during the period.

38


Property, Office and Technology
     Property, office and technology costs decreased 11.6% to $214.3 million in 2008 from $242.5 million in 2007, due primarily to reduced depreciation charges reflecting longer useful lives for certain global technology initiatives. During the three months ended December 31, 2008, charges of $5.1 million were recorded related to vacating leased property; however these charges were offset during the year by downward adjustments in rent costs for sublet office property of $8.2 million. Rent expense during the year ended December 31, 2007, included a $7.4 million charge related to vacating leased property.
General and Administrative
     General and administrative expenses decreased by $29.8 million (10.1%) to $266.0 million in 2008 from $295.8 million in 2007. During the three months ended December 31, 2007, we recorded $12.8 million of expense related to the relisting of the company on the New York Stock Exchange and a $9.8 million charge related to the proposed final settlement of market-timing private litigation that commenced in 2003.
Operating Income, Net Operating Income, Operating Margin and Net Operating Margin
     Operating income decreased 24.8% to $747.8 million in 2008 from $994.3 million in 2007, driven by the declines in operating revenues from reduced AUM. Operating margin (operating income divided by operating revenues) was 22.6% in 2008, down from 25.6% in 2007. Net operating income (operating income plus our proportional share of the operating income from joint venture arrangements) decreased 24.3% to $787.5 million in 2008 from $1,039.8 million in 2007. Net operating margin is equal to net operating income divided by net revenues. Net revenues are equal to operating revenues less third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses, plus our proportional share of the net revenues from our joint venture arrangements. Net operating margin was 31.6% in 2008, down from 36.0% in 2007. See “Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for a reconciliation of operating revenues to net revenues, a reconciliation of operating income to net operating income and additional important disclosures regarding net revenues, net operating income and net operating margins.
Other Income and Expenses
     Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates decreased by $1.3 million (2.7%) to $46.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2008 (December 31, 2007: $48.1 million), resulting primarily from declines in our share of the pre-tax losses of our partnership investments.
     Interest income decreased 23.3% to $37.2 million in 2008 from $48.5 million in 2007 due to the combination of lower interest rates and lower average cash and cash equivalents balances in 2008. The decrease in yields was consistent with the market movement from 2007 to 2008. Interest expense increased 7.9% to $76.9 million in 2008 from $71.3 million in 2007 due to increases in the average debt balance in 2008, which were only partially offset by lower debt costs in 2008.
     Other gains and losses, net were a net loss of $39.9 million in 2008, compared to a net gain of $9.9 million in 2007. The 2008 net loss included $22.7 million in other-than-temporary impairment charges related to the valuations of investments in certain of our CLO products (2007: $5.4 million) and $8.5 million in other-than-temporary impairment charges related to other seed money in affiliated funds (2007: $0 million). The impairment of the CLO products arose principally from increases in discount rates and extended cash flow projections used in the valuation models, and the impairment of the seed money arose principally due to extended declines in market values of the underlying funds. $14.2 million of the combined impairment charges arose during the three months ended December 31, 2008.
     Included in other gains and losses, net are net gains on disposals of investments of $4.3 million in 2008 (2007: $24.0 million), primarily driven by a gain of $7.4 realized upon the maturity of a CLO product in which the company had invested. Also included in other losses are net foreign exchange losses, primarily associated with long-term intercompany financing. In the year ended December 31, 2008, we incurred $13.0 million in net foreign exchange losses (2007: $10.3 million), largely the result of the weakening of the Pound Sterling to the Euro and U.S. dollar in the three months ended December 31, 2008. See Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 13, Other Gains and Losses, Net,” for additional details related to other gains and losses.
     Included in other income and expenses are net realized and unrealized gains of consolidated investment products. In 2008, the net losses of consolidated investment products were $58.0 million, compared to net gains of $214.3 million in 2007, reflecting the changes in market values of the investments held by consolidated investment products and the deconsolidation of certain variable

39


interest entities for which we determined that we were no longer the primary beneficiary. Invesco invests in a small equity portion of these products, and as a result the majority of these gains and losses are offset by noncontrollingnon-controlling interests.
Income Tax Expense
     The 2008 U.K. statutory tax rate was 28.0%, the Canadian statutory tax rate was 33.5% and the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate was 35.0%.
     The U.K.’s tax rate decreased from 30% to 28.0% effective April 1, 2008. On December 14, 2007, legislation was enacted to reduce the Canadian income tax rate over five years, which changed the tax rate to 33.5% in 2008 and 33.0% in 2009. The legislation was revised in December 2009, further reducing the rate to 31.0% in 2010, 28.25% in 2011 and 26.25% in 2012.
     Our effective tax rate excluding noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities for 2008 was 32.9%, as compared to 34.6% in 2007. The decrease related primarily to a net reduction in our reserves, lower state taxes, and reduced taxes on subsidiary dividends in excess of an increase in the net valuation allowance for subsidiary operating losses and certain investment write-downs that did not give rise to tax benefits. Our effective tax rate, after noncontrolling interests, increased to 52.9% for the three months ended December 31, 2008, largely as a result of the investment write-downs. 2007 included a reduction in our Canadian and U.K. deferred tax assets to reflect the tax rate changes discussed above and transaction costs associated with our change in listing and domicile that were not deductible for tax purposes.
     The inclusion of income from noncontrolling interests increased our effective tax rate to 35.9% in 2008 and reduced it to 28.7% in 2007.
Schedule of Non-GAAP Information
     Net revenuesBeginning with the presentation of the company’s results for the three months ended March 31, 2010, the company has expanded its use of non-GAAP measures to include reconciling items primarily relating to guidance now encompassed in the Accounting Standards Codification Topic 810 (discussed in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 1, “Accounting Policies”) and the acquisition of Morgan Stanley’s retail asset management business, including Van Kampen Investments (the “acquired business” or the “acquisition”). We are presenting the following non-GAAP measures: net revenue (and by calculation, net revenue yield on AUM), netadjusted operating income and(and by calculation, adjusted operating margin), adjusted net income (and by calculation, adjusted earnings per share (EPS)). Prior to June 30, 2010, adjusted operating income, adjusted operating margin, adjusted net income, and adjusted earnings per share were described as “adjusted cash operating income,” “adjusted cash operating margin,” “adjusted cash net income,” and “adjusted cash earnings per share,” respectively. We believe these non-GAAP measures provide greater transparency into our business and allow more appropriate comparisons with industry peers. Management uses these performance measures to evaluate the business, and they are non-GAAP financialconsistent with internal management reporting. Effective June 30, 2010, the company removed “cash” from the names of these measures to emphasize that these measures are performance measures and not liquidity measures. The most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measures are operating revenues (and by calculation, gross revenue yield on AUM), operating income and(and by calculation, operating margin. Management believes thatmargin), net income (and by calculation, diluted EPS). Each of these measures is discussed more fully below.
     Also beginning with the exclusion of third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses from operating revenues in the computation of net revenues and the related computation of net operating margin provides useful information to investors because the distribution, service and advisory fee amounts represent costs that are passed through to external parties who perform functions on behalfpresentation of the company’s managed funds, which essentially are a shareresults for the three months ended March 31, 2010, the net revenue measure has been redefined from that previously used to adjust for the impact of consolidating certain investment products. The presentation of net revenue in this Report for the related revenues. These expenses vary by geography dueyears ended December 31, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 have been restated to conform the calculation to the differences in distribution channels. The net presentation assists in identifying the revenue contribution generated by the business, removing the distortions caused by the differing distribution channel fees and assisting in comparison with U.S. peer investment managers. Third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses include renewal commissions paid to independent financial advisors for as long as the clients’ assets are invested and are payments for the servicing of client accounts. Renewal commissions are calculated based upon a percentage of the AUM value. Third party distribution expenses also include the amortization of upfront commissions paid to broker-dealers for sales of fund shares with a contingent deferred sales charge (a charge levied to the investor for client redemption of AUM within a certain contracted period of time). The distribution commissions are amortized over the redemption period. Also included in third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses are sub-transfer agency fees that are paid to third parties for processing client share purchases and redemptions, call center support and client reporting. Since the company has been deemed to be the principal in the third-party arrangements, the company must reflect these expenses gross of operating revenues under U.S. GAAP. We believe that it is useful information to investors to show these expenses net of operating revenues, because net presentation more appropriately reflects the nature of these expenses as revenue-sharing activities. Additionally, management evaluates net revenue yield on AUM, which is equal to net revenues divided by average AUM during the reporting period. This metric is an indicator of the basis point net revenues we receive for each dollar of AUM we manage and is useful when evaluating the company’s performance relative to industry competitors.current period’s methodology.
     Management also believes that the addition of our proportional share of revenues, net of distribution expenses, from joint venture investments in the computation of net revenues and the addition of our proportional share of operating income in the related computations of net operating income and net operating margin also provide useful information to investors, as management considers it appropriate to evaluate the contribution of its joint venture to the operations of the business. The company has two joint venture investments in China. The Invesco Great Wall joint venture was one of the largest Sino-foreign managers of equity products in China, with ending AUM of approximately $8 billion as of December 31, 2009. Enhancing our operations in China is one effort that we believe could improve our competitive position over time. Accordingly, we believe that it is appropriate to evaluate the contribution of our joint venture investments to the operations of the business.

40


     Net revenues (and by calculation net revenue yield on AUM), net operating income, and net operating marginThese non-GAAP measures should not be considered as substitutes for any measures derived in accordance with U.S. GAAP and may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies.
     The company will Additional reconciling items may be expanding its use ofadded in the future to these non-GAAP measures in future filings, beginning with the Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010, to include reconciling items relating to FASB Statement No. 167 (discussed in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” and in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 1, Accounting Policies”) and the acquisition of Morgan Stanley’s retail asset management business.if deemed appropriate.

52


     The following is a reconciliationare reconciliations of operating revenues, operating income (and by calculation, operating margin), and operating marginnet income (and by calculation, diluted EPS) on a U.S. GAAP basis to net revenues, netadjusted operating income (and by calculation, adjusted operating margin), and adjusted net operating margin.income (and by calculation, adjusted EPS):
                     
  Years Ended December 31,
$in millions 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005
Operating revenues, GAAP basis  2,627.3   3,307.6   3,878.9   3,246.7   2,872.6 
Third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses  (693.4)  (875.5)  (1,051.1)  (826.8)  (706.0)
Proportional share of net revenues from joint venture arrangements  44.8   57.3   60.6   8.1    
                     
Net revenues  1,978.7   2,489.4   2,888.4   2,428.0   2,166.6 
                     
Operating income, GAAP basis  484.3   747.8   994.3   759.2   407.9 
Proportional share of operating income from joint venture investments  28.4   39.7   45.5   2.9    
                     
Net operating income  512.7   787.5   1,039.8   762.1   407.9 
                     
Operating margin*  18.4%  22.6%  25.6%  23.4%  14.2%
Net operating margin**  25.9%  31.6%  36.0%  31.4%  18.8%
                     
$ in millions, except per share data 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
Operating revenues, U.S. GAAP basis  3,487.7   2,627.3   3,307.6   3,878.9   3,246.7 
Third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses(1)
  (972.7)  (693.4)  (875.5)  (1,051.1)  (826.8)
Proportional share of net revenues from joint venture arrangements(2)
  42.2   44.7   57.3   60.6   8.1 
Management fees earned from consolidated investment products eliminated upon consolidation(3)
  45.3   8.0   6.2   8.7   11.3 
Other revenues recorded by consolidated investment products(3)
  (0.3)  (2.0)  (5.4)  (15.2)  (26.5)
                     
Net revenues  2,602.2   1,984.6   2,490.2   2,881.9   2,412.8 
                     
                     
Operating income, U.S. GAAP basis  589.9   484.3   747.8   994.3   759.2 
Proportional share of operating income from joint venture investments(2)
  22.9   28.4   39.7   45.5   2.9 
Transaction and integration charges(4)
  150.0   10.8          
Amortization of acquisition-related prepaid compensation(4)
  20.0   20.0   20.0   25.0    
Amortization of other intangibles(4)
  30.3   12.6   13.3   12.0   10.0 
Change in contingent consideration estimates  (3.8)            
Compensation expense related to market valuation changes in deferred compensation plans(5)
  9.3             
Consolidation of investment products(3)
  54.9   9.5   5.3   1.8   (5.9)
Other reconciling items(6)
  24.2             
                     
Adjusted operating income  897.7   565.6   826.1   1,078.6   766.2 
                     
Operating margin*  16.9%  18.4%  22.6%  25.6%  23.4%
Adjusted operating margin**  34.5%  28.5%  33.2%  37.4%  31.8%
                     
Net income attributable to common shareholders, U.S. GAAP basis  465.7   322.5   481.7   673.6   482.7 
Transaction and integration charges, net of tax(4)
  103.1   8.9          
Amortization of acquisition-related prepaid compensation(4)
  20.0   20.0   20.0   25.0    
Amortization of other intangibles, net of tax(4)
  27.4   12.3   13.0   11.7   9.8 
Change in contingent consideration estimates, net of tax  (2.5)            
Deferred compensation plan market valuation changes and dividend income less compensation expense, net of tax(5)
  (5.3)            
Deferred income taxes on intangible assets(4)
  21.1   14.4   12.4   7.9   7.2 
Consolidation of investment products(3)
  (6.8)            
Other reconciling items, net of tax(6)
  17.0             
                     
Adjusted net income  639.7   378.1   527.1   718.2   499.7 
                     
                     
Average shares outstanding — diluted  463.2   423.6   399.1   411.9   406.1 
Diluted EPS $1.01  $0.76  $1.21  $1.64  $1.19 
Adjusted EPS*** $1.38  $0.89  $1.32  $1.74  $1.23 
 
* Operating margin is equal to operating income divided by operating revenues.
 
** NetAdjusted operating margin is equal to netadjusted operating income divided by net revenues.
***Adjusted EPS is equal to adjusted net income divided by the weighted average shares outstanding amount used in the calculation of diluted EPS.

53


(1)Third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses
Third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses include renewal commissions, management fee rebates and distribution costs paid to brokers and independent financial advisors. While the terms used for these types of expense vary by geography, they are all expense items that are closely linked to the value of AUM and the revenue earned by Invesco from AUM.
Renewal commissions are paid to independent financial advisors for as long as the clients’ assets remain invested and are payments for the servicing of client accounts. These commissions, similar to our management fee revenues, are based upon a percentage of the AUM value and apply to much of our non-U.S. retail business. They can also take the form of management fee rebates, particularly outside of the U.S.
The revenues of our U.S. business include distribution fees earned from mutual funds, principally 12b-1 fees, which are passed through to brokers who sell our funds. Distribution costs are expenses paid to third-party brokers of our U.S. business. These include the amortization over the redemption period of upfront commissions paid to brokers for sales of fund shares with a contingent deferred sales charge (a charge levied on investors for redemptions within a certain contracted period of time). Both the revenues and the costs are dependent on the underlying AUM of the brokers’ clients.
Also included in third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses are sub-transfer agency fees that are paid to third parties for processing client share purchases and redemptions, call center support and client reporting. These costs are reimbursed by the related funds.
Since the company has been deemed to be the principal in the third-party arrangements, the company must reflect these expenses gross of operating revenues under U.S. GAAP. Management believes that the deduction of third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses from operating revenues in the computation of net revenues (and by calculation, net revenue yield on AUM) and the related computation of adjusted operating income (and by calculation, adjusted operating margin), is useful information for investors and other users of the company’s financial statements because such presentation appropriately reflects the nature of these expenses as revenue-sharing activities, as these costs are passed through to external parties who perform functions on behalf of the company’s managed funds. Further, these expenses vary extensively by geography due to the differences in distribution channels. The net presentation assists in identifying the revenue contribution generated by the business, removing distortions caused by the differing distribution channel fees and allowing for a fair comparison with U.S. peer investment managers and within the company. Additionally, management evaluates net revenue yield on AUM, which is equal to net revenues divided by average AUM during the reporting period. This financial measure is an indicator of the basis point net revenues we receive for each dollar of AUM we manage and is useful when evaluating the company’s performance relative to industry competitors and within the company for capital allocation purposes.
(2)Proportional share of net revenues and operating income from joint venture investments
The company has two joint venture investments in China. The Invesco Great Wall joint venture is one of the largest Sino-foreign managers of equity products in China, with AUM of approximately $7.2 billion as of December 31, 2010. The company has a 49.0% interest in Invesco Great Wall. The company also has a 50% joint venture with Huaneng Capital Services to assess private equity investment opportunities in power generation in China through Huaneng Invesco WLR Investment Consulting Company Ltd. Enhancing our operations in China is one effort that we believe could improve our competitive position over time. Accordingly, we believe that it is appropriate to evaluate the contribution of our joint venture investments to the operations of the business.
Management believes that the addition of our proportional share of revenues, net of distribution expenses, from joint venture investments in the computation of net revenues and the addition of our proportional share of operating income in the related computations of adjusted operating income and adjusted operating margin also provide useful information to investors and other users of the company’s financial statements, as management considers it appropriate to evaluate the contribution of its joint ventures to the operations of the business. It is also consistent with the presentation of AUM and net flows (where our proportional share of the ending balances and related activity are reflected) and therefore provides a more meaningful calculation of net revenue yield on AUM.
(3)Consolidated investment products
In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 810 which was effective January 1, 2010. It has had a significant impact on the presentation of the company’s financial statements. The company’s Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2010 reflects the elimination of management and performance fees earned from these CLOs and other consolidated investment products. See Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 20,

54


“Consolidated Investment Products” for a detailed analysis of the impact to the company’s Consolidated Financial Statements from the consolidation of investment products.
Management believes that the consolidation of investment products may impact a reader’s analysis of our underlying results of operations and could result in investor confusion or the production of information about the company by analysts or external credit rating agencies that is not reflective of the underlying results of operations and financial condition of the company. Accordingly, management believes that it is appropriate to adjust operating revenues, operating income and operating margin for the impact of consolidated investment products in calculating the respective net revenues, adjusted operating income and adjusted operating margin. The reconciling items add back the management and performance fees earned by Invesco from the consolidated products and remove the revenues and expenses recorded by the consolidated products that have been included in the U.S. GAAP Consolidated Statements of Income.
(4)Acquisition-related reconciling items
Acquisition-related adjustments include transaction and integration expenses and intangible asset amortization related to acquired assets, amortization of prepaid compensation related to the 2006 acquisition of W.L. Ross & Co., and tax cash flow benefits resulting from tax amortization of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. These charges reflect the legal, regulatory, advisory, valuation, integration-related employee incentive awards and other professional or consulting fees, general and administrative costs, including travel costs related to the transaction and the costs of temporary staff involved in executing the transaction, and the post closing costs of integrating the acquired business into the company’s existing operations including incremental costs associated with achieving synergy savings. Additionally, transaction and integration expenses include legal costs related to the defense of auction rate preferred securities complaints raised in the pre-acquisition period with respect to various closed-end funds included in the acquisition. See Item 3, “Legal Proceedings” for additional information.
The acquisition will result in additional future amortization expenses of approximately $23 million per year for the first 2 years following June 1, 2010. The expense then reduces in future years as the acquired finite-lived intangible assets become fully expensed. The U.S. GAAP to non-GAAP reconciling items also include acquisition-related amortization charges related to previous business combinations. The tax benefit is recorded on a portion of the intangible amortization expense that does not generate a cash tax benefit. The W.L. Ross & Co. prepaid compensation expense will continue through 2010, and the acquisition-related asset will be fully amortized by the third quarter of 2011.
Management believes it is useful to investors and other users of our financial statements to adjust for the transaction and integration charges and the amortization expenses in arriving at adjusted operating income, adjusted operating margin and adjusted EPS, as this will aid comparability of our results period to period, and aid comparability with peer companies that may not have similar acquisition-related charges.
While finite-lived intangible assets are amortized under U.S. GAAP, there is no amortization charge on goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles. In certain qualifying situations, these can be amortized for tax purposes, generally over a 15-year period, as is the case in the U.S. These cash flows (in the form of reduced taxes payable) represent tax benefits that are not included in the Consolidated Statements of Income absent an impairment charge or the disposal of the related business. We believe it is useful to include these tax cash flow benefits in arriving at the adjusted EPS measure. The company receives these cash flow benefits but does not anticipate a sale or impairment of these assets in the foreseeable future, and therefore the deferred tax liability recognized under U.S. GAAP is not expected to be used either through a credit in the Consolidated Statements of Income or through settlement of tax obligations.
(5)Market movement on deferred compensation plan liabilities
In 2009, Invesco introduced an incentive plan whereby certain of our investment team members can receive deferred cash compensation linked in value to the investment products being managed by the team. This is in lieu of share-based awards which were largely the only prior form of deferred compensation used by Invesco.
These awards involve a return to the employee linked to the appreciation (depreciation) of specified investments, typically the funds managed by the employee. Invesco hedges economically the exposure to market movements by holding these investments on its balance sheet. U.S. GAAP requires the appreciation (depreciation) in the compensation liability to be expensed over the award vesting period in proportion to the vested amount of the award as part of compensation expense. The full value of the investment appreciation (depreciation) is immediately recorded below operating income in other gains and losses. This creates a timing difference between the recognition of the compensation expense and the investment gain or loss impacting net income attributable to common shareholders and diluted EPS which will reverse over the life of the award and net to zero at the end of the multi-year vesting period. During periods of high market volatility these timing differences impact compensation expense, operating income and operating margin in a manner which, over the life of the award, will ultimately be offset by gains and losses recorded below operating income on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

55


Since these plans are hedged economically, management believes it is useful to reflect the offset ultimately achieved from hedging the investment market exposure in the calculation of adjusted operating income (and by calculation, adjusted operating margin) and adjusted net income (and by calculation, adjusted EPS), to produce results that will be more comparable period to period. The related fund shares will have been purchased on or around the date of grant, eliminating any ultimate cash impact from market movements that occur over the vesting period. The non-GAAP measures therefore exclude the mismatch created by differing U.S. GAAP treatments of the market movement on the liability and the investments.
Additionally, dividend income from investments held to hedge economically deferred compensation plans is recorded as dividend income and as compensation expense on the company’s Consolidated Statements of Income on the record dates. This dividend income is passed through to the employee participants in the plan and is not retained by the company. The non-GAAP measures exclude this dividend income and related compensation expense.
No adjustments are being made for the prior period comparative non-GAAP measures presented above due to the relative insignificance of the amounts in those periods.
(6)Other reconciling items
Included within general and administrative expenses is a charge of $8.9 million ($6.0 million net of tax) for the year ended December 31, 2010, representing reimbursement costs from the correction of historical foreign exchange allocations in the fund accounting process that impacted the reporting of fund performance in certain funds. Also included within general and administrative expenses is a charge of $15.3 million ($11.0 million net of tax) recorded in the three months ended December 31, 2010, relating to a levy from the U.K. Financial Services Compensation Scheme. Assessments were levied upon all Financial Services Authority (FSA)-registered investment management companies in proposition to their “eligible income” (as defined by the FSA) to cover claims resulting from failures of non-affiliated investment firms. Management does not include these costs in internal reporting and these costs do not form part of the overall evaluation of the business. Management therefore believes that the exclusion of these costs, due to their unique character and magnitude, from total operating expenses provides useful information to investors, as this view is consistent with how management evaluates the performance of the business. Exclusion of these costs will aid in comparability of our results from period to period and the comparability of our results with those of peer investment managers.

56


Balance Sheet Discussion
     Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets are presented below and reflect the consolidation of investment products, including the adoption of guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 810 on January 1, 2010. The majority of the company’s consolidated investment products were CLOs as of December 31, 2010. The collateral assets of the CLOs are held solely to satisfy the obligations of the CLOs. The company has no right to the benefits from, nor does it bear the risks associated with, the collateral assets held by the CLOs, beyond the company’s minimal direct investments in, and management fees generated from, CLOs. If the company were to liquidate, the collateral assets would not be available to the general creditors of the company, and as a result, the company does not consider them to be company assets. Additionally, the investors in the CLOs have no recourse to the general credit of the company for the notes issued by the CLOs. The company therefore does not consider this debt to be a company liability.
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
                 
      Consolidated    
  Before Investment    
$ in millions Consolidation(1) Products(2) Adjustments(3) Total
As of December 31, 2010
                
Current assets  3,480.0   816.8   (22.3)  4,274.5 
Non-current assets  9,025.1   7,205.5   (61.0)  16,169.6 
                 
Total assets  12,505.1   8,022.3   (83.3)  20,444.1 
                 
Current liabilities  2,777.9   508.9   (22.3)  3,264.5 
Long-term debt of consolidated investment products     5,888.2   (22.8)  5,865.4 
Other non-current liabilities  1,953.3         1,953.3 
                 
Total liabilities  4731.2   6,397.1   (45.1)  11,083.2 
                 
Retained earnings appropriated for investors in consolidated investment products     495.5      495.5 
Other equity attributable to common shareholders  7,769.1   38.2   (38.2)  7,769.1 
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities  4.8   1,091.5      1,096.3 
                 
Total liabilities and equity  12,505.1   8,022.3   (83.3)  20,444.1 
                 
                 
      Consolidated    
  Before Investment    
$ in millions Consolidation(1) Products(2) Adjustments(3) Total
As of December 31, 2009
                
Current assets  3,089.8   31.2      3,121.0 
Non-current assets  7,111.8   685.0   (8.2)  7,788.6 
                 
Total assets  10,201.6   716.2   (8.2)  10,909.6 
                 
Current liabilities  2,293.6   4.8      2,298.4 
Non-current liabilities  990.4         990.4 
                 
Total liabilities  3,284.0   4.8      3,288.8 
                 
Total equity attributable to common shareholders  6,912.9   8.2   (8.2)  6,912.9 
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities  4.7   703.2      707.9 
                 
Total liabilities and equity  10,201.6   716.2   (8.2)  10,909.6 
                 
(1)The Before Consolidation column includes Invesco’s equity interest in the investment products, accounted for as equity method and available-for-sale investments and does not include any other adjustments related to non-GAAP financial measure presentation.
(2)The company adopted guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 810, “Consolidation,” on January 1, 2010, resulting in the consolidation of certain CLOs. In accordance with the standard, prior periods have not been restated to reflect the consolidation of these CLOs. Prior to January 1, 2010, the company was not deemed to be the primary beneficiary of these CLOs.
(3)Adjustments include the elimination of intercompany transactions between the company and its consolidated investment products, primarily the elimination of the company’s equity at risk recorded as investments by the company (before consolidation) against either equity (private equity and real estate partnership funds) or subordinated debt (CLOs) of the funds.

57


     The following table presents a comparative analysis of significant detailed balance sheet line items:
                                
$ in millions 2009 2008 $ Change % Change 2010 2009 $ Change % Change
Cash and cash equivalents 762.0 585.2 176.8  30.2% 740.5 762.0  (21.5)  (2.8)%
Unsettled fund receivables 383.1 303.7 79.4  26.1% 513.4 383.1 130.3  34.0%
Current investments 182.4 123.6 58.8  47.6% 308.8 182.4 126.4  69.3%
Assets held for policyholders 1,283.0 840.2 442.8  52.7% 1,295.4 1,283.0 12.4  1.0%
Non-current investments 157.4 121.3 36.1  29.8% 164.4 157.4 7.0  4.4%
Investments of consolidated investment products 685.0 843.8  (158.8)  (18.8)% 7,206.0 685.0 6,521.0 N/A 
Goodwill 6,467.6 5,966.8 500.8  8.4% 6,980.2 6,467.6 512.6  7.9%
Policyholder payables 1,283.0 840.2 442.8  52.7% 1,295.4 1,283.0 12.4  1.0%
Current maturities of total debt  297.2  (297.2)  (100.0)%
Long-term debt 745.7 862.0  (116.3)  (13.5)% 1,315.7 745.7 570.0  76.4%
Long-term debt of consolidated investment products 5,865.4  5,865.4 N/A 
Retained earnings appropriated for investors in consolidated investment products 495.5  495.5 N/A 
Equity attributable to common shareholders 6,912.9 5,689.5 1,223.4  21.5% 8,264.6 6,912.9 1,351.7  19.6%
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities 707.9 906.7  (198.8)  (21.9)% 1,096.3 707.9 388.4  54.9%
Cash and cash equivalents
     Cash and cash equivalents increaseddecreased by $21.5 million from December 31, 2008, to$762.0 million at December 31, 2009 primarily due to $441.8$740.5 million at December 31, 2010. Significant cash activity in 2010 included the utilization of cash received frombalances to partly fund business acquisitions, to purchase treasury shares and to pay quarterly dividends. During the equity issuance and $362.7year, the company paid $775.9 million net cash on business acquisitions, and treasury share purchases during the year utilized $192.2 million of cash. Dividend payments totaled $197.9 million during 2010. The company initially borrowed $650.0 million from the credit facility in June 2010 to partly fund acquisition payments, this credit facility balance reducing to $570.0 million by the end of 2010. The balance of cash outflows has been funded from improved cash flows generated from operating activities, offset by $397.2 million used to retire debt, $168.9 million used to payactivities. See “Cash Flows” in the quarterly dividends,following section within this Management’s Discussion and net $43.5 million of investmentsAnalysis for addition discussion regarding the movements in seeding new products.cash flows during the periods.
     Invesco has local capital requirements in several jurisdictions, as well as regional requirements for entities that are part of the European sub-group. These requirements mandate the retention of liquid resources in those jurisdictions, which we meet in part by holding cash and cash equivalents. This retained cash can be used for general business purposes in the European sub-group or in the

41


countries where it is located. Due to the capital restrictions, the ability to transfer cash between certain jurisdictions may be limited. In addition, transfers of cash between international jurisdictions may have adverse tax consequences that may substantially limit such activity. At December 31, 2009,2010, the European sub-group had cash and cash equivalent balances of $333.5$456.2 million, much of which is used to satisfy these regulatory requirements. We are in compliance with all regulatory minimum net capital requirements.
     In addition, the company is required to hold cash deposits with clearing organizations or to otherwise segregate cash to maintain compliance with federal and other regulations in connection with its UIT broker dealer entity, which was part of the acquired business. At December 31, 2010 these cash deposits totaled $14.9 million.
Unsettled fund receivables
     Unsettled fund receivables increased from $303.7by $130.3 million at December 31, 2008, tofrom $383.1 million at December 31, 2009 to $513.4 million at December 31, 2010, due to $60.3 million of unsettled balances associated with the UIT products that formed part of the acquired business together with higher transaction activities. Unsettledactivity between funds and investors in late December 2010 when compared to late December 2009 in our offshore funds. In the company’s capacity as sponsor of UITs, the company records receivables from brokers, dealers, and clearing organizations for unsettled sell trades of securities and UITs in addition to receivables from customers for unsettled trades of securities. In our U.K. and offshore activities, unsettled fund receivables are created by the normal settlement periods on transactions initiated by certain clients of our U.K. and offshore funds.clients. The presentation of the receivableunsettled fund receivables and substantially offsetting payablepayables ($367.9 million)504.8 million at December 31, 2010) at trade date with both the investor and the fund for normal purchases and sales reflects the legal relationship between the underlying investor and the company.

58


Investments (current and non-current)
     As of December 31, 2009,2010 we had $339.8$473.2 million in investments;investments, of which $182.4$308.8 million were current investments and $157.4$164.4 million were non-current investments. Included in current investments are $74.8$99.5 million of seed money investments in affiliated funds used to seed funds as we launch new products, and $84.6$165.5 million of investments related to assets held for deferred compensation plans. These investmentsplans, which are also held primarily in affiliated funds andfunds. Seed investments increased significantly from December 31, 2008,by $24.7 million during the year, primarily due to newthe $53.9 million of seed investments purchasedincluded in the acquired business at the closing on June 1. Subsequently we have liquidated over half of these acquired business seed investments as the related funds achieved the necessary third-party funding levels. Investments held to economically hedge new deferred compensation liabilities that arose from both the modification of certain share-based awards increased by $80.8 million during the period (discussedyear as we purchased additional investments in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 17, Share-Based Compensation”) and the establishment of aaffiliated funds to hedge economically new deferred compensationemployee plan for certain employees of the company.awards. Included in non-current investments are $134.7$156.9 million in equity method investments in our Chinese joint ventures and in certain of the company’s private equity, real estate and other investments. Equityinvestments (December 31, 2009: $134.7 million). The increase of $22.2 million in equity method investments includes an increase of $21.6 million in partnership investments due to capital calls, valuation improvements exceeding distributions, capital returns and partnerships acquired through acquisitions during the period. The value of the joint venture investments and other non-controlling equity method investments increased by $39.4$0.6 million fromduring the prior year balance,as a result of current year earnings of $19.4 million, foreign exchange rate movements which added $1.8 million to the increase including a $30.0value, offset by annual dividends paid of $20.6 million new investment in Invesco Mortgage Capital, Inc. (IVR, discussed in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 16, Consolidated Investment Products”). Additionally, non-current investments include $17.9 million of investments in collateralized loan obligation structures managed by Invesco. Our investments in collateralized loan obligation structures are generally into the form of a relatively small portion of the unrated, junior subordinated position. As such, these positions would share in the first losses to be incurred if the structures were to experience significant increases in default rates of underlying investments above historical levels.company.
Assets held for policyholders and policyholder payables
     One of our subsidiaries, Invesco Perpetual Life Limited, is an insurance company that was established to facilitate retirement savings plans in the U.K. The entity holds assets that are managed for its clients on its balance sheet with an equal and offsetting liability. The increasing balance in these accounts from $840.2 million at December 31, 2008, to $1,283.0 million at December 31, 2009, to $1,295.4 million at December 31, 2010, was the result of foreign exchange movements, the increaseincreases in the market values of these assets and net flows into the funds.funds partially offset by foreign exchange movements.
Investments of consolidated investment products
     TheEffective January 1, 2010, upon the adoption of guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 810, the company determined that it was the primary beneficiary of certain CLO variable interest entities (VIEs) is required to consolidate the VIEs. A VIE is an entity that does not have sufficient equity to finance its operations withoutentities. See Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 20, “Consolidated Investment Products,” for additional subordinated financial support, or an entity for which the risks and rewards of ownership are not directly linked to voting interests. Generally, limited partnership entities where the general partner does not have substantive equity investment at risk and where the other limited partners do not have substantive (greater than 50%) rights to remove the general partner or to dissolve the limited partnership are also VIEs. The primary beneficiary is the party to the VIE who absorbs a majority of the losses or absorbs the majority of the rewards generated by the VIE. Additionally, under the voting interest entity (VOE) consolidation model, the general partner in a partnership that is not a VIE consolidates the partnership because the general partner is deemed to control the partnership where the other limited partners do not have substantive kick-out, liquidation or participation rights. Investments of consolidated investment products include the investments of both consolidated VIEs and VOEs.
details. As of December 31, 2009,2010, investments of consolidated investment products totaled $685.0$7,206.0 million (December 31, 2008: $843.82009: $685.0 million). These investments are offset primarily in long-term debt of consolidated investment products, noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities, and retained earnings appropriated for investors in consolidated investment products on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, as the company’s equity investment in these structures is very small.not significant. The decreaseincrease from December 31, 2008,2009, primarily reflects adoption of the impact of declining market values andguidance on January 1, 2010. In accordance with the deconsolidation during the period ended December 31, 2009, of $53.3 million of investments held by consolidated investment products and related noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities, asguidance, prior periods have not been restated. As a result of determining thatvarious acquisitions, the company is no longer the primary beneficiary.consolidated additional CLOs with investments of $762.3 million at June 1, 2010 and an additional $289.9 million in investments at December 31, 2010.

42


Goodwill
     Goodwill increased from $5,966.8 million at December 31, 2008, to $6,467.6 million at December 31, 2009, to $6,980.2 million at December 31, 2010, primarily due to the impact ofacquisition, which added $372.8 million to the company’s goodwill balance on June 1. The increase in goodwill was also due to foreign currency translation for certain subsidiaries whose functional currency differs from that of the parent. The foreign exchange rates at the end of 2009,2010 used to translate the balance sheets of foreign currency subsidiaries into U.S. dollars, the reporting currency of the company, reflect a weaker U.S. dollar at the end of 2009,2010, mainly against the Canadian dollar offset by a stronger U.S. dollar mainly against and Pound Sterling, which resulted in a $466.6$71.0 million net increase in goodwill, upon consolidation, with a corresponding increase in equity.consolidation. Additional goodwill was recorded in 20092010 related to other acquisition activity ($26.8 million) and the earn-out on the W.L. Ross & Co. acquisition ($34.240.4 million). The company’s annual goodwill impairment review is performed as of October 1 of each year. As a result of that analysis, the company determined that no impairment existed at that date. Separately, due to deteriorating market conditions, interim impairment tests were performed at October 31, 2008, and March 31, 2009. These interim tests also concluded that no impairment had occurred. As each test concluded that the fair value was above the carrying value, there was no need to progress to the process of separately valuing each class of asset and liability. See “Critical Accounting Policies — Goodwill” for additional details of the company’s goodwill impairment analysis process.
Current portion of total debt
     This balance decreased from $297.2 million at December 31, 2008 to $0.0 million at December 31, 2009, as a result of the 4.5% senior notes maturing on December 15, 2009, and being repaid from available cash resources.
Long-term debt
     The non-current portion of our total debt, decreasedexcluding long-term debt of consolidated investment products, increased from $862.0 million at December 31, 2008, to $745.7 million at December 31, 2009, to $1,315.7 million at December 31, 2010, as $12.0 million borrowings under the floating ratecompany utilized its credit facility were repaidto cover a portion

59


of the cash consideration paid to Morgan Stanley in connection with the acquisition. As of December 31, 2010 there was $570.0 million outstanding on the credit facility.
Long-term debt of consolidated investment products
     Long-term debt of consolidated investment products relates to notes issued by consolidated CLOs. Collateral assets of the CLOs, which are included in investments of consolidated investment products, are held solely to satisfy the obligations of the CLOs. The investors in the CLO have no recourse to the general credit of the company for the notes issued by the CLOs.
     Long-term debt of consolidated investment products was $5,865.4 million at December 31, 2010, primarily reflecting the adoption of guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 810 on January 1, 2010. In accordance with the standard, prior periods have not been restated to reflect the consolidation. As a result of the acquisition, the company consolidated additional CLOs with notes issued of $630.2 million at June 1, 2010.
Retained earnings appropriated for investors in consolidated investment products
     The retained earnings appropriated for investors in consolidated investment products relates primarily to the difference in value between the collateral assets held (which are included in investments of consolidated investment products), and $104.3the debt issued, by consolidated CLOs. The collateral assets held, and notes issued, by consolidated CLOs are measured at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
     Retained earnings appropriated for investors in consolidated investment products was $495.5 million at December 31, 2010, reflecting the adoption gudiance now encompassed in ASC Topic 810, “Consolidation,” on January 1, 2010, which resulted in the consolidation of certain CLOs with $6.9 billion of assets held and $5.9 billion in debt issued at December 31, 2010. In accordance with the standard, prior periods have not been restated to reflect the consolidation. A beginning balance adjustment of $274.3 million was retired throughmade as of the tender offer transaction described belowbeginning of the year to reflect existing equity balances in “Debt.”newly consolidated CLOs. During 2010, increases in the balance resulted from the acquisition ($149.4 million) and from net income earned over the period ($77.1 million).
NoncontrollingEquity attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities
     NoncontrollingEquity attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities decreasedincreased by $198.8$388.4 million from $906.7 million at December 31, 2008, to $707.9 million at December 31, 2009, primarily due to $106.9$1,096.3 million at December 31, 2010. The majority of losses recorded by the consolidated investment productsincrease relates to acquisitions, which added $363.6 million during the year andyear. The remainder of the deconsolidation during the period of $53.3 million of investments held by consolidated investment products and relatedvariance relates to net gains attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities as a result of determining that$94.0 million, which were offset by $69.2 million of net changes in the company was no longerpartners’ capital of these entities during the primary beneficiary.period.
     The noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities are generally offset by the net assets of certain consolidated investment products, as the company’s equity investment in the investment products is very small.not significant.
Equity attributable to common shareholders
     Equity attributable to common shareholders increased from $5,689.5 million at December 31, 2008, to $6,912.9 million at December 31, 2009, to $8,264.6 million at December 31, 2010, an increase of $1,223.4$1,351.7 million. An issuance$274.3 million of new shares raised a net $441.8 million andthis increase relates to the changesbeginning balance adjustment to retained earnings appropriated for investors in foreign currency rates added $488.3 million to equity. Otherconsolidated investment products, as discussed above. Additional increases to equity included $718.6 million as a result of business combinations, net income attributable to common shareholders of $322.5$465.7 million, share issuances upon employee option exercises of $80.3$19.6 million, and the share baseda share-based payment credit to capital of $90.8 million.$117.8 million representing the accrual of share-based payment expense during the year, and $77.3 million of changes in foreign currency rates. The increase also includes $77.1 million of net income appropriated for investors in consolidated investment products, as discussed above. The increases to equity were partially offset by $168.9$197.9 million in dividend payments $13.0 million related to the modification of a share-based payment award into a cash-settled award, $22.9and $240.1 million in treasury shares acquired through market purchases ($192.2 million) and from employeesstaff to meet withholding tax obligations on share award vestings, and a $7.5 million deduction arising on the purchase of the remaining noncontrolling interest in Invesco Real Estate GmbH.vesting ($47.9 million).
Liquidity and Capital Resources
     On May 26, 2009, we issued 32.9 million common sharesThe adoption guidance now encompassed in a public offering that produced gross proceedsASC Topic 810, “Consolidation,” on January 1, 2010, which resulted in the consolidation of $460.5 million ($441.8 million net$6.9 billion and $5.9 billion of related expenses). On June 9, 2009, we replaced our existing $900.0 million credit facility, which was never fully utilized, with a $500.0 million multi-year credit facility, the amounttotal assets and long-term debt of which was based upon our past and projected working capital needs; however, we are able to increase the new credit facility to $750.0 million, subject to certain conditions. AtCLO products as of December 31, 2009,2010, respectively, did not impact the company’s liquidity and capital resources. The collateral assets of the CLOs are held solely to satisfy the obligations of the CLOs. The company hadhas no balance drawn onright to the credit facility. These two transactions reflected our ability to accessbenefits from, nor does it bear the capital markets in a timely manner. On June 30, 2009, we completed a $100.0 million tender offer to purchase publicly traded debtrisks associated with, athe collateral

4360


principal valueassets held by the CLOs, beyond the company’s minimal direct investments in, and management fees generated from, these products, which are eliminated upon consolidation. If the company were to liquidate, the collateral assets would not be available to the general creditors of $104.3 million. On December 15, 2009, we repaid the $294.2 million 4.5% senior notes that matured on that date, utilizing existing cash balances, having repurchased $3.0 million of these notes earliercompany, and as a result, the company does not consider them to be company assets. Additionally, the investors in the year.CLOs debt tranches have no recourse to the general credit of the company for the notes issued by the CLOs. The company therefore does not consider this debt to be an obligation of the company. See Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 20, “Consolidated Investment Products,” for additional details.
     On July 28, 2010 S&P announced an upgrade of our credit rating from BBB+/Positive to A-/Stable. In October 2010, Invesco became one of only four public investment managers with a “Strong” risk management rating from S&P. Standard & Poor’s rates companies’ enterprise risk management capabilities on a scale of Fair, Adequate, Strong, and Excellent.
     We believe that our capital structure, together with available cash balances, cash flows generated from operations, existing capacity under our credit facility, proceeds from the public offering of our shares and further capital market activities, if necessary, should provide us with sufficient resources to meet present and future cash needs, including operating, debt and other obligations as they come due and anticipated future capital requirements. Additionally,On June 1, 2010, we expect to use availableused a combination of existing cash balances and borrowings under our$650.0 million credit facility borrowing to satisfy the $500.0$770.0 million cash consideration related to acquisitionacquisition. We issued 30.9 million shares of Morgan Stanley’s retail asset management business, including Van Kampen Investments. Newnew equity, in the form of common and non-voting common equivalent preferred shares (with economic rights identical to common stock, other than no right to vote such shares) is expected to be issued to Morgan Stanley, without holding restrictions, in conjunction with the close. (The preferred shares were subsequently sold, as converted, to unrelated third parties.) The ultimate purchase price for the business may be higher orwas lower than the $1.5 billion previously announced purchase price, due to contractualdepreciation of Invesco’s common share price adjustmentsfrom the announcement date to the June 1, 2010 closing date. During the last two quarters we repurchased 9.4 million common shares in open market transactions utilizing $192.2 million in cash. We believe that will made depending on certain conditions being met at the closing date and changes in the company’s share price. For example, a price adjustment may be made based on the degree to which clientscash flow generated from operations of the business being acquiredcombined firm, the remaining $680.0 million in credit facility capacity, and our ability to access the capital markets, will provide their consent for the transaction at the timesufficient liquidity to meet future capital resource needs.
     The following summary of closing the deal.our recent capital transactions confirms our ability to access capital markets in a timely manner:
The May 26, 2009 issuance of 32.9 million common shares in a public offering that produced gross proceeds of $460.5 million ($441.8 million net of related expenses);
The June 9, 2009 replacement of our $900.0 million credit facility, which was never fully utilized, with a $500.0 million credit facility (with an option to increase it to $750.0 million, subject to certain conditions), the amount of which was based upon our past and projected working capital needs;
The June 30, 2009 completion of a $100.0 million tender offer to purchase publicly traded debt with a principal value of $104.3 million;
The December 15, 2009 repayment of $294.2 million 4.5% senior notes that matured on that date through the utilization of existing cash balances, having repurchased $3.0 million of these notes earlier in the year;
The May 24, 2010 termination of the $500.0 million credit facility and entrance into a new three-year $1,250.0 million credit facility.
     Our ability to continue to access the capital markets in a timely manner depends on a number of factors including our credit rating, the condition of the global economy, investors’ willingness to purchase our securities, interest rates, credit spreads and the valuation levels of equity markets. If we are unable to access capital markets in a timely manner, our business could be adversely impacted.
     Certain of our subsidiaries are required to maintain minimum levels of capital. These and other similar provisions of applicable law may have the effect of limiting withdrawals of capital, repayment of intercompany loans and payment of dividends by such entities. After redomicile and after consultation with the U.K. FSA, it has been determined that, for the purposes of prudential supervision, Invesco Ltd. is not subject to regulatory consolidated capital requirements under current European Union (EU) Directives. A sub-group however,of Invesco subsidiaries, including all of our regulated EU subsidiaries, is subject to these consolidated capital requirements under applicable European Union (EU) directives, and capital is maintained within this sub-group to satisfy these regulations. These requirements mandate the retention of liquid resources in those jurisdictions, which we meet in part by holding cash and cash equivalents. This retained cash can be used for general business purposes in the European sub-group or in the countries where it is located. Due to the capital restrictions, the ability to transfer cash between certain jurisdictions may be limited. In addition, transfers of cash between international jurisdictions may have adverse tax consequences that may substantially limit such activity. At December 31, 2009,2010, the European sub-group had cash and cash equivalent balances of $333.5$456.2 million, much of which is used to satisfy these regulatory requirements. We are in compliance with all regulatory minimum net capital requirements.

61


     In addition, the company is required to hold cash deposits with clearing organizations or to otherwise segregate cash to maintain compliance with federal and other regulations in connection with its UIT broker dealer entity, which was included in the acquired business. At December 31, 2010 these cash deposits totaled $14.9 million.
Cash Flows Discussion
     The ability to consistently generate cash from operations in excess of capital expenditures and dividend payments is one of our company’s fundamental financial strengths. Operations continue to be financed from current earnings and borrowings. Our principal uses of cash, other than for operating expenses, include dividend payments, capital expenditures, acquisitions, purchase of our shares in the open market and investments in certain new investment products.
     Cash flows of consolidated investment products (discussed in Item 8, “FinancialFinancial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 16, Consolidated20, “Consolidated Investment Products”) are reflected in Invesco’s cash provided byused in operating activities, used inprovided by investing activities and used inprovided by financing activities. Cash held by consolidated investment products is not available for general use by Invesco, nor is Invesco cash available for general use by its consolidated investment products. Accordingly, the table below presents the cash flows of the company separately and before consolidation of investment products, as the cash flows of consolidated investment products do not form part of the company’s cash flow management processes, nor do they form part of the company’s significant liquidity evaluations and decisions for the reasons noted. The discussion that follows the table will focus on the company’s cash flows as presented in the “Before Consolidation” column of the table.
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
     Cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 2008 and 20072008 are summarized as follows:
             
$ in millions 2009 2008 2007
Net cash (used in)/provided by:            
Operating activities  362.7   525.5   915.5 
Investing activities  (102.4)  (98.4)  (48.2)
Financing activities  (100.7)  (666.4)  (740.8)
             
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  159.6   (239.3)  126.5 
Foreign exchange  17.2   (91.3)  10.4 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period  585.2   915.8   778.9 
             
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period  762.0   585.2   915.8 
             
                 
      Consolidated    
  Before Investment    
$ in millions Consolidation Products(1) Adjustments(2) Total
For the year ended December 31, 2010
                
Net income  456.1   181.4   (0.7)  636.8 
Net purchases of trading investments  (60.4)        (60.4)
Other adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities  232.6   (114.0)  0.7   119.3 
Changes in cash held by consolidated investment products     (336.2)     (336.2)
Other changes in operating assets and liabilities  (27.1)  46.8      19.7 
                 
Net cash provided by operating activities  601.2   (222.0)     379.2 
                 
Net proceeds of investments by consolidated investment products     498.6      498.6 
Purchases of available for sale and other investments  (109.1)     5.8   (103.3)
Proceeds from sales and returns of capital of available for sale and other investments  134.6      (2.2)  132.4 
Other investing activities  (865.5)        (865.5)
                 
Net cash (used in)/provided by investing activities  (840.0)  498.6   3.6   (337.8)
                 
Net capital distributed by consolidated investment products     (276.6)  (3.6)  (280.2)
Other financing activities  214.3         214.3 
                 
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities  214.3   (276.6)  (3.6)  (65.9)
                 
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents  (24.5)        (24.5)
Foreign exchange movement on cash and cash equivalents  3.0         3.0 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period  762.0         762.0 
                 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period  740.5         740.5 
                 
(1)The company adopted guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 810 on January 1, 2010, resulting in the consolidation of certain CLOs. In accordance with the standard, prior periods have not been restated to reflect the consolidation of these CLOs. Prior to January 1, 2010, the company was not deemed to be the primary beneficiary of these CLOs.
(2)Adjustments include reclassifications to align the presentation of the cash flows of the consolidated investment funds with those of the company.

4462


             
      Consolidated  
  Before Investment  
$ in millions Consolidation Products Total
For the year ended December 31, 2009
            
Net income  323.2   (113.9)  209.3 
Net purchases of trading investments  (28.8)     (28.8)
Other adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities  193.6   106.9   300.5 
Changes in cash held by consolidated investment products     45.0   45.0 
Other changes in operating assets and liabilities  (162.2)  (1.1)  (163.3)
             
Net cash (used in)/provided by operating activities  325.8   36.9   362.7 
             
Net proceeds of investments by consolidated investment products     8.0   8.0 
Other investing activities  (110.4)     (110.4)
             
Net cash (used in)/provided by investing activities  (110.4)  8.0   (102.4)
             
Net capital distributed by consolidated investment products     (44.9)  (44.9)
Other financing activities  (55.8)     (55.8)
             
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities  (55.8)  (44.9)  (100.7)
             
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents  159.6      159.6 
Foreign exchange movement on cash and cash equivalents  17.2      17.2 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period  585.2      585.2 
             
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period  762.0      762.0 
             
             
      Consolidated  
  Before Investment  
$ in millions Consolidation Products Total
For the year ended December 31, 2008
            
Net income  483.4   (62.4)  421.0 
Net purchases of trading investments  0.3      0.3 
Other adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities  224.3   58.0   282.3 
Changes in cash held by consolidated investment products     (37.1)  (37.1)
Other changes in operating assets and liabilities  (132.2)  (8.8)  (141.0)
             
Net cash (used in)/provided by operating activities  575.8   (50.3)  525.5 
             
Net proceeds of investments by consolidated investment products     175.6   175.6 
Other investing activities  (274.0)     (274.0)
             
Net cash (used in)/provided by investing activities  (274.0)  175.6   (98.4)
             
Net capital distributed by consolidated investment products     (125.3)  (125.3)
Other financing activities  (541.1)     (541.1)
             
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities  (541.1)  (125.3)  (666.4)
             
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents  (239.3)     (239.3)
Foreign exchange movement on cash and cash equivalents  (91.3)     (91.3)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period  915.8      915.8 
             
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period  585.2      585.2 
             
Operating Activities
     NetOperating cash provided by operating activities isflows are generated by the receipt of investment management and other fees generated from AUM, offset by operating expenses and changes in operating assets and liabilities. Although some receipts and payments are seasonal, particularly bonus payments, in general, after allowing for the change in cash held by consolidated investment products, our operating cash flows move in the same direction as our operating income.

63


     In 2010, cash generated by operating activities increased $16.5 million to $379.2 million from $362.7 million in 2009. As shown in the tables above, consolidated investment products used $222.0 million of cash in operating activities in 2010 compared to contributing $36.9 million in 2009. The reducedsum of the operating, investing and financing cash flows of consolidated investment products offsets to a zero impact to the company’s change in cash and cash equivalent balances from period to period. Excluding the impact of consolidated investment products, cash generated by operations was $601.2 million in 2010 compared to $325.8 million in 2009.
     The generation of $601.2 million of cash from operations in 2010 included:
net purchases of trading investments of $60.4 million. Trading investments are held to provide an economic hedge against staff deferred compensation plan awards together with investments held for a short period, often only a few days, for the purpose of creating a UIT.
net cash generated from the other operating activities of $661.6 million, representing net income as adjusted for non-cash items and the changes in operating assets and liabilities. Annual staff bonus accruals at the end of 2010 exceeded the cash bonus payments made in 2010 by $66.7 million, the payments made in 2010 reflecting staff expenses accrued in 2009. This expense and cash paid timing difference results in operating cash flows in a calendar year differing from operating income reported in the Consolidated Statements of Income. This has contributed to the operating cash generated in 2010 exceeding operating income for the year. Related payroll taxes and annual pension contributions have similar, albeit less significant timing impacts.
     The $325.8 million of cash generated from operations in 2009 included:
net purchases of trading investments of $28.8 million principally for staff deferred compensation plan awards.
cash generated from the other operating activities of $354.6 million, representing net income as adjusted for non-cash items and the changes in operating assets and liabilities. Cash payments made in 2009 related to staff bonuses exceeded the bonus expense accrual for 2009 by $71.4 million and contributed to operating cash flow being below operating income for the year.
     After excluding the net purchase of trading investments, cash generated from other operating activities in 2010 improved by $307.0 million from $354.6 million in 2009 to $661.6 million in 2010. This reflects the improved operating income together with the timing differences on staff bonus and other staff compensation related payments.
     The 35.2% reduction in operating income for the year ended December 31, 2009, when compared to the prior year2008 is a significant factor in the year-on-year reduced operating cash flows.
     Cash After excluding the impact of consolidated investment products, cash provided by operating activities in 2009 was $362.7$325.8 million, a decrease of $162.8$250.0 million or 31%43.4% over 2008. Changes in operating assets and liabilities used $118.3 millionThe timing of cash, while the combined cash generated from other operating items was $481.0 million. The change in operating assets and liabilities was driven by the funding of annual bonuses combined with the lower levels of accrued bonus awards at the end of 2009 together with higher trade receivables atcontributed to operating cash falling by a greater percentage than operating income.
Investing Activities
     Net cash used in investing activities totaled $337.8 million for the endyear ended December 31, 2010 (2009: net cash used of 2009, compared to the end of 2008. The change in operating assets and liabilities also includes a decrease of $45.0 million$102.4 million). As shown in the cash held by consolidated investment products.
     Cash provided by operating activities in 2008 was $525.5 million, a decrease of $390.0 million or 42.6% from 2007. Changes in operating assets and liabilities contributed $273.9 million of the decrease, and lower net income, after adjusting for the gains and losses oftable above, consolidated investment products, including investment purchases, sales and returns of capital, contributed a further $193.2$498.6 million (2009: $8.0 million contributed). After allowing for these consolidated investment product cash flows, net cash used in investing activities was $840.0 million (2009: net cash used of $110.4 million). The closing of the decreaseacquisition on June 1, 2010 resulted in the payment of cash flows generated from operating activities.
Investing Activities
     The launchconsideration of a number$770.0 million while the acquired business had cash and cash equivalents on its balance sheet of new products during mid and late 2009 resulted in$57.8 million on that date, giving a net cash outflow into seed and partnership investments of $43.5$712.2 million. In 2010, additional net acquisition payments were $37.4 million together with acquisition earn-out payments of $26.3 million (2009: $34.2 million).
     In addition, during the year. During year ended December 31, 2009, we recaptured $60.6 million in cash from redemption of prior investments, including seed and partnership2010 the company purchased available-for-sale investments and investedother investments of $109.1 million (2009: $104.1 million in new products.
     During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009, 2008million) and 2007, ourhad capital expenditures of $89.6 million (2009: $39.5 million). These cash outflows were $39.5partly offset from collected proceeds of $134.6 million $84.1 millionfrom sales and $36.7 million, respectively. Expendituresreturns of capital of investments in 2010 (2009: $60.6 million).

64


     The increase in capital expenditure cash outflows in 2010 when compared to 2009 was primarily related to technology and computer hardware needed for the acquired business. Our capital expenditures related principally in each year to technology initiatives, including new platforms from which we maintain our portfolio management systems and fund accounting systems, improvements in computer hardware and software desktop products for employees, new telecommunications products to enhance our internal information flow, and back-up disaster recovery systems. Also, in each year, a portion of these coststotal capital expenditures were related to leasehold improvements made to the various buildings and workspaces used in our offices. These projects have been funded with proceeds from our operating cash flows. Capital expenditures in 2008 also included expenditures related to leasehold improvements in the new headquarters space. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009, 20082010 and 2007,2009, our capital divestitures were not significant relative to our total fixed assets.
     Investing activities include the investment purchases and sales of our consolidated investment products. In total, these contributed $8.0 million, $175.6 million and $8.1 million toNet cash generatedused in investing activities duringtotaled $102.4 million for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2009 compared to $98.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. As shown in the table above, consolidated investment products, including investment purchases, sales and returns of capital, contributed $8.0 million (2008: $175.6 million contributed). After allowing for these consolidated investment product cash flows, net cash used in investing activities was $110.4 million in 2009 compared to net cash used of $274.0 million in 2008. The increased use of investing activity cash in 2008 reflected higher levels of acquisition earn-out payments and 2007, respectively.
     Netcapital expenditure. Acquisition earn-out cash outflows ofpayments were $34.2 million in 2009 relatedcompared to acquisition earn-out$174.3 million in 2008, the payments relatedrelating to the 2006 acquisitionacquisitions of WL Ross & Co. In 2008, net cash outflows of $130.9 million and $43.4 million related to acquisition earn-out payments for the PowerShares and WL Ross & Co. acquisitions, respectively.Capital expenditure in 2009 was $39.5 million compared to $84.1 million in 2008, the 2008 amount including leasehold improvements related to new headquarters space in Atlanta.
Financing Activities
     Net cash used in financing activities totaled $100.7$65.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2009.2010 (2009: $100.7 million). As shown in the table above, the financing activities of the consolidated investment products used cash of $276.6 million during the year (2009: $44.9 million). Excluding the impact of the consolidated investment products, financing activities provided cash of $214.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2010 (2009: cash utilized $55.8 million).
     To provide the cash funding needed to complete the business acquisition in late May 2010, $650.0 million was borrowed from the company’s $1,250.0 million credit facility. The balance on the facility at December 31, 2010 was $570.0 million as $80.0 million of cash generated from operating activities was utilized to partially repay the initial amount borrowed. Financing cash activities in 2009 included an equity issuance generatedgenerating cash proceeds of $441.8 million and proceeds from the exercise of options were $80.0 million. These inflows were offset by the redemption of senior notes of $397.2 million.
     Other financing cash flows during the year ended December 31, 2010 included $197.9 million net repayments of our credit facility of $12.0 million, anddividend payments for the $168.9 million payment of dividends declared in January, April, July and October 2009. Financing2010 (2009: dividends paid of $168.9 million), the purchase of treasury shares through market transactions totaling $192.2 million (2009: none), cash flows also include a paymentinflows from the exercise of $8.9options of $19.6 million to purchase the remaining 24.9%(2009: $80.0 million), and excess tax benefits cash inflows from share-based compensation of Invesco Real Estate GmbH not already held by the company, the controlling interest having been acquired in December 2003.
     The net cash used in financing activities also includes a net $44.9$14.8 million of outflows related to consolidated investment products (2008: $125.3 million; 2007: $27.7(2009: $9.4 million).
     Net cash used inby financing activities in 2009 of $100.7 million decreased from $740.8$666.4 million utilized in 2008. As shown in the table above, the financing activities of the consolidated investment products used cash of $44.9 million during 2009 (2008: $125.3 million). Excluding the impact of the consolidated investment products, financing activities used cash of $55.8 million in 20072009 compared to $666.4$541.1 million in 2008. During 2008 primarily due to lower levelsthe company used $313.4 million of capital being returned through public stock repurchases of Invesco Ltd. common stock, in form of treasury shares. Cash usedcash for treasury share purchases through market transactions, there being no equivalent purchases in 20082009. Dividends paid in 2009 totaled $313.4$168.9 million compared to $716.0$207.1 million in 2007.2008, the 2008 payments including the annual dividend for 2007 (the company converting to a quarterly dividend payment pattern from 2008). Repayments of $397.2 million and $12.0 million were made to senior notes and the credit facility respectively in 2009 compared to $2.8 million and $114.4 million respectively in 2008. There was no equity issuance in 2008.

45


Dividends
     Invesco declares and pays dividends on a quarterly basis in arrears. The 20092010 quarterly dividend was $0.1025$0.11 per Invesco Ltd. common share. On October 16, 2009,25, 2010, the company declared a third quarter cash dividend, which was paid on December 2, 2009,8, 2010, to shareholders of record as of November 18, 2009.19, 2010. On January 27, 2010,2011, the company declared a fourth quarter cash dividend, which will be paid on March 10, 2010,9, 2011, to shareholders of record as of February 23, 2010.2011. The total dividend attributable to the 2010 fiscal year of $0.44 per share represented a 7.3% increase over the total dividend attributable to the 2009 fiscal year of $0.41 per share represented a 2.5% increase over the total dividend attributable to the 2008 fiscal year of $0.40 per share.
     The declaration, payment and amount of any future dividends will be declared by our board of directors and will depend upon, among other factors, our earnings, financial condition and capital requirements at the time such declaration and payment are considered. The board has a policy of managing dividends in a prudent fashion, with due consideration given to profit levels, overall debt levels, and historical dividend payouts.

65


     The following table sets forth the historical amounts for quarterly and total dividends per Invesco Ltd. common share attributable to each period indicated. Actual declaration of these dividends occurred in the following fiscal quarter.
                     
  U.S. Cents per Common Share
Years Ended December 31, Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total
2009  10.25   10.25   10.25   10.25   41.0 
                     
2008  10.0   10.0   10.0   10.0   40.0 
Share Repurchase Plan
     On April 23, 2008, the board of directors authorized a new share repurchase program of up to $1.5 billion with no stated expiration date. During the year ended December 31, 2009, there were no purchases under this program (December 31, 2008: 5.52010, the company repurchased 9.4 million common shares purchased under this program at a cost of $139.4utilizing $192.2 million and 6.1 million shares purchased under the prior share repurchase plan at a cost of $154.5 million)(December 31, 2009: no purchases), leaving approximately $1.4$1.2 billion authorized at the end of the year. Separately, an aggregate of 1.61.9 million shares were withheld on vesting events during the year ended December 31, 2009,2010, to meet employees’ tax obligations (December 31, 2008: 0.32009: 1.6 million). The carrying value of these shares withheld was $22.9$47.9 million (December 31, 2008: $4.62009: $22.9 million).
Debt
     Our total indebtedness at December 31, 2010 was $1,315.7 million (December 31, 2009 is $745.7 million (December 31, 2008: $1,159.2 million) and iswas comprised of the following:
        
         December 31, December 31,
$ in millions December 31, 2009 December 31, 2008 2010 2009
Unsecured Senior Notes:  
4.5% — due December 15, 2009  297.2 
5.625% — due April 17, 2012 215.1 300.0  215.1 215.1 
5.375% — due February 27, 2013 333.5 350.0  333.5 333.5 
5.375% — due December 15, 2014 197.1 200.0  197.1 197.1 
Floating rate credit facility terminated on June 9, 2009  12.0 
Floating rate credit facility expiring June 9, 2012   
Floating rate credit facility expiring May 23, 2013 570.0  
          
Total debt 745.7 1,159.2  1,315.7 745.7 
Less: current maturities of total debt  297.2    
          
Long-term debt 745.7 862.0  1,315.7 745.7 
          
     For the three months and year ended December 31, 2009,2010, the company’s weighted average cost of debt was 5.27%3.68% and 5.14%4.30%, respectively (three months and year ended December 31, 2008: 4.93%2009: 5.27% and 4.87%5.14%, respectively). Total debt decreasedincreased from $1,159.2 million at December 31, 2008, to $745.7 million at December 31, 2009, to $1,315.7 million at December 31, 2010, due primarily to repayment of maturing senior notes, borrowings under our floating rate credit facility, and retirement of debt through the tender offer.facility.
     On June 2, 2009, the company commenced a tender offer for the maximum aggregate principal amount of the outstanding 5.625% senior notes due 2012, the 5.375% senior notes due 2013, and the 5.375% senior notes due 2014 (collectively, the “Notes”) that it could purchase for $100.0 million at a purchase price per $1,000 principal amount determined in accordance with the procedures of a

46


modified “Dutch Auction” (tender offer). The tender offer expired at midnight on June 29, 2009, and on June 30, 2009, $104.3 million of the Notes had been retired, generating a gross gain of $4.3 million upon the retirement of debt at a discount.
     A summary of the Notes tendered is presented below:
                         
                      Percent of 
  Accepted Tender      Total  Tender Offer  Accrued  Outstanding 
$ in millions Amount  Base Price  Consideration(1)  Consideration(2)  Interest(3)  Amount Tendered 
5.625% — due April 17, 2012 $84,897,000  $920.00  $970.00  $940.00  $11.41   28.3%
5.375% — due February 27, 2013 $16,532,000  $870.00  $920.00  $890.00  $18.36   4.7%
5.375% — due December 15, 2014 $2,874,000  $800.00  $850.00  $820.00  $2.24   1.4%
                        
  $104,303,000                     
                        
(1)Consideration paid per $1,000 principal amount of Notes tendered on or prior to an Early Participation Date (as defined in the Offer to Purchase), which includes a $30.00 early participation amount. The total consideration was determined based on the formula consisting of the base price plus a clearing premium.
(2)Consideration paid per $1,000 principal amount of Notes tendered after the Early Participation Date and on or prior to the Expiration Date (as defined in the Offer to Purchase).
(3)Accrued interest paid per $1,000 principal amount of Notes.
On June 9, 2009, the company completed a new three-year $500.0 million revolving bank credit facility. The new facility replacesreplaced the $900.0 million credit facility that was scheduled to expire on March 31, 2010, but was terminated concurrent with the entry into the new credit facility. Financial covenants under the new credit facility include:included: (i) the quarterly maintenance of a debt/EBITDA ratio, as defined in the credit agreement, of not greater than 3.25:1.00 through December 31, 2010, and not greater than 3.00:1.00 thereafter, (ii) a coverage ratio (EBITDA, as defined in the credit agreement/interest payable for the four consecutive fiscal quarters ended before the date of determination) of not less than 4.00:1.00, and (iii) maintenance on a monthly basis of consolidated long term assets under management (as defined in the credit agreement) of not less than $194.8 billion, which amount is subject to a one-time reset by the company under certain conditions.
     On May 24, 2010, the company terminated the $500.0 million credit facility and entered into a new $1,250 million credit facility. Amounts borrowed under the credit facility are repayable at maturity on May 23, 2013. Financial covenants under the credit agreement include: (i) the quarterly maintenance of a debt/EBITDA ratio, as defined in the credit agreement, of not greater than 3.25:1.00 through December 31, 2011, and not greater than 3.00:1.00 thereafter, (ii) a coverage ratio (EBITDA, as defined in the credit agreement/interest payable for the four consecutive fiscal quarters ended before the date of determination) of not less than 4.00:1.00. As of December 31, 2009,2010 we were in compliance with our debtfinancial covenants. At December 31, 2009,2010 our leverage ratio was 1.11:1.34:1.00 (December 31, 2008: 1.28:2009: 1.11:1.00), and our interest coverage ratio was 11.01:17.27:1.00 (December 31, 2008: 12.20:2009: 11.01:1.00), and our long-term AUM were $343.6 billion..

66


     The coverage ratios, as defined in our credit facility, were as follows during 2010, 2009 2008 and 2007:2008:
                 
  2010
  Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Leverage Ratio  0.99   1.60   1.52   1.34 
Interest Coverage Ratio  13.06   13.03   16.43   17.26 
Long-term AUM  350.6   N/A*  N/A*  N/A*
                 
  2009
  Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Leverage Ratio  1.48   1.63   1.77   1.11 
Interest Coverage Ratio  11.31   9.64   9.12   11.01 
Long-term AUM  N/A*  299.0   329.7   343.6 
                 
  2008
  Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Leverage Ratio  1.25   1.11   1.17   1.28 
Interest Coverage Ratio  16.99   16.53   15.19   12.20 
                 
  2007
  Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Leverage Ratio  1.18   0.97   0.91   1.04 
Interest Coverage Ratio  12.96   13.54   14.30   17.81 
 
* Long-TermLong-term AUM became a debt covenant measure as part of the June 9, 2009 credit facility agreement and was discontinued as a financial covenant measure as part of the May 24, 2010 credit facility agreement. Long-term AUM was not required to be restated as part of the agreement and therefore amounts have not been adjusted from what was previously reported.

47


     The December 31, 2009,2010, coverage ratio calculations are as follows:
                               
$ millions, except as noted Total Q4 2009 Q3 2009 Q2 2009 Q1 2009
$ millions Total Q4 2010 Q3 2010 Q2 2010 Q1 2010
Net income attributable to common shareholders 322.5 110.9 105.2 75.7 30.7  465.7 175.2 154.7 40.8 95.0 
Net income attributable to Consolidated Investment Products  (9.8)  (4.2)  (1.8)  (2.2)  (1.6)
Tax expense 148.2 48.2 43.7 36.0 20.3  197.0 55.7 54.5 36.7 50.1 
Amortization/depreciation 77.6 24.9 20.0 16.7 16.0  96.7 31.3 26.3 20.8 18.3 
Interest expense 64.5 15.2 16.9 16.5 15.9  58.6 16.0 16.1 14.1 12.4 
Share-based compensation expense 90.8 22.6 24.3 20.2 23.7  117.8 30.8 31.5 31.3 24.2 
Unrealized gains and losses from investments, net* 6.5 0.3  (1.4) 1.0 6.6  8.9 8.4  (8.8) 7.7 1.6 
Acquired business proforma EBITDA impact** 76.9   35.7 41.2 
                      
EBITDA** 710.1 222.1 208.7 166.1 113.2 
EBITDA*** 1,011.8 313.2 272.5 184.9 241.2 
                      
Adjusted debt** 790.2 
Adjusted debt*** $1,351.2 
      
Leverage ratio (Debt/EBITDA — maximum 3.25:1.00) 1.11  1.34 
      
Interest coverage (EBITDA/Interest Expense — minimum 4.00:1.00) 11.01  17.26 
      
December 31, 2009, long-term AUM (in billions — minimum $194.8 billion) 343.6 
   
 
* Adjustments for unrealized gains and losses from investments, as defined in our credit facility, include non-cash gains and losses on investments to the extent that they do not represent anticipated future cash receipts or expenditures.
 
** The credit facility agreement requires that the company shall calculate EBITDA on a proforma basis including the impact of the acquired business as if the acquisition had occurred on the first day of the EBITDA period.
***EBITDA and Adjusted debt are non-GAAP financial measures; however management does not use these measures for anything other than these debt covenant calculations. The calculation of EBITDAEBTIDA above (a reconciliation from net income attributable to common shareholders) is defined by our credit agreement, and therefore net income attributable to common shareholders is the most appropriate GAAP measure from which to reconcile to EBITDA. The calculation of adjusted debt is defined in our credit facility and equals total long-term debt of $745.7$1,315.7 million plus $44.4$35.5 million in letters of credit and $0.1 million in capital leases.credit.

67


     We have received credit ratings of A3A3/Stable and BBB+A-/Stable from Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s credit rating agencies, respectively, as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Standard & Poor’s has a “positive” outlook for the rating while Moody’s has a “stable” outlook for the rating as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. According to Moody’s, obligations rated ‘A’ are considered upper medium grade and are subject to low credit risk. Invesco’s rating of A3 is at the low end of the A range (A1, A2, A3), but three notches above the lowest investment grade rating of Baa3. Standard and Poor’s rating of BBB+A- is at the upperlower end of the BBBA rating, with BBB- representing Standard and Poor’s lowest investment grade rating. According to Standard and Poor’s, BBBA obligations exhibit adequate protection parameters; however,a strong capacity to meet financial commitments, but are somewhat susceptible to adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity of the obligor to meet its financial commitments.circumstances. We believe that rating agency concerns include but are not limited to: our abilityrevenues are somewhat exposed to sustain net positive asset flows across customer channels, product type and geographies, our level of indebtedness, our risk appetite and approachequity market volatility, negative tangible equity, potential impact from regulatory changes to risk management, our ability to maintain consistent positive investment performance, the profitability of our business under a sustained downturn scenario,industry, and integration risk related to the pending acquisition of Morgan Stanley’s retail asset management business. Additionally, the rating agencies could decide to downgrade the entire assetinvestment management industry, based on their perspective of future growth and solvency. Material deterioration of these factors, and others defined by each rating agency, could result in downgrades to our credit ratings, thereby limiting our ability to generate additional financing. Our credit facility borrowing rates are tied to our credit ratings. However, management believes that solid investment grade ratings are an important factor in winning and maintaining institutional business and strives to manage the company to maintain such ratings. Disclosure of these ratings is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold our debt. These credit ratings may be subject to revision or withdrawal at anytime by Moody’s or Standard & Poor’s. Each rating should be evaluated independently.
     The discussion that follows identifies risks associated with the company’s liquidity and capital resources. The Executive Overview of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains a broader discussion of the company’s overall approach to risk management.
Credit and Liquidity Risk
     Capital management involves the management of the company’s liquidity and cash flows. The company manages its capital by reviewing annual and projected cash flow forecasts and by monitoring credit, liquidity and market risks, such as interest rate and foreign currency risks (as discussed in Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk”), through measurement and analysis. The company is primarily exposed to credit risk through its cash and cash equivalent deposits, which are held by external

48


firms. The company invests its cash balances in its own institutional money market products, as well as with external high credit-quality financial institutions; however, we have chosen to limit the number of firms with which we invest. These arrangements create exposure to concentrations of credit risk.
Credit Risk
     Credit risk is the risk that one party to a financial instrument will cause a financial loss for the other party by failing to discharge an obligation. The company is subject to credit risk in the following areas of its business:
All cash and cash equivalent balances are subject to credit risk, as they represent deposits made by the company with external banks and other institutions. As of December 31, 2009, our maximum exposure to credit risk related to our cash and cash equivalent balances is $762.0 million. Cash and cash equivalents invested in affiliated money market funds (related parties) totaled $465.1 million at December 31, 2009.
Certain trust subsidiaries of the company accept deposits and place deposits with other institutions on behalf of our customers. As of December 31, 2009, our maximum exposure to credit risk related to these transactions is $0.8 million.
All cash and cash equivalent balances are subject to credit risk, as they represent deposits made by the company with external banks and other institutions. As of December 31, 2010, our maximum exposure to credit risk related to our cash and cash equivalent balances is $740.5 million. Of this amount, cash and cash equivalents invested in affiliated money market funds (related parties) totaled $289.6 million at December 31, 2010.
Certain trust subsidiaries of the company accept deposits and place deposits with other institutions on behalf of our customers. As of December 31, 2010, our exposure to credit risk related to these transactions is $2.4 million.
     The company does not utilize credit derivatives or similar instruments to mitigate the maximum exposure to credit risk. The company does not expect any counterparties to its financial instruments to fail to meet their obligations.
Liquidity Risk
     Liquidity risk is the risk that the company will encounter difficulty in meeting obligations associated with its financial liabilities. The company is exposed to liquidity risk through its $745.7$1,315.7 million in total debt. The company actively manages liquidity risk by preparing cash flow forecasts for future periods, reviewing them regularly with senior management, maintaining a committed credit facility, scheduling significant gaps between major debt maturities and engaging external financing sources in regular dialog.

68


Effects of Inflation
     Inflation can impact our organization primarily in two ways. First, inflationary pressures can result in increases in our cost structure, especially to the extent that large expense components such as compensation are impacted. To the degree that these expense increases are not recoverable or cannot be counterbalanced through pricing increases due to the competitive environment, our profitability could be negatively impacted. Secondly, the value of the assets that we manage may be negatively impacted when inflationary expectations result in a rising interest rate environment. Declines in the values of these AUM could lead to reduced revenues as management fees are generally calculated based upon the size of AUM.
Off Balance Sheet Commitments
     The company transactshas transactions with various private equity, real estate and other investment entities sponsored by the company for the investment of client assets in the normal course of business. Certain of these investments are considered to be variable interest entities of which the company is the primary beneficiary and certain of these investments are limited partnerships for which the company is the general partner and is deemed to have control (with the absence of substantive kick-out, liquidation or participation rights of the other limited partners) and are consolidated into the company’s financial statements under a voting interest entity model (see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 16, Consolidated Investment Products” and “Note 1, Accounting Policies” for additional information on consolidated and unconsolidated investment products).
Many of the company’s investment products are structured as limited partnerships. OurThe company’s investment may take the form of the general partner or as a limited partner, and the entities are structured such that each partner makes capital commitments that are to be drawn down over the life of the partnership as investment opportunities are identified. At December 31, 2009, our2010, the company’s undrawn capital commitments were $77.6$136.4 million (2008: $36.5(December 31, 2009: $77.6 million).
     The volatility and valuation dislocations that have occurred from 2007 to 2009the date of this Report in certain sectors of the fixed income market have generated pricing issues in many areas of the market. As a result of these valuation dislocations, during the fourth quarter of 2007, Invesco elected to enter into contingent support agreements for two of its investment trusts to enable them to sustain a stable pricing structure. These two trusts are unregistered trusts that invest in fixed income securities and are available only to accreditedstrictly limited types of investors. In December 2009,2010, the agreements were amended to extend the term through June 30, 2010.2011; further extensions are likely. As of December 31, 2009,2010, the total committed

49


support under these agreements was $51.0$36.0 million with an internal approval mechanism to increase the maximum possible support to $66.0 million at the option of the company. The recorded fairestimated value of the guarantees related to these agreements at December 31, 2009,2010 was estimated to be $2.5$2.0 million (December 31, 2008: $5.52009: $2.5 million), which was recorded in other current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.Sheet. The estimated value of these agreements is lower than the maximum support amount, reflecting management’s estimation that the likelihood of funding under the support agreements is low. Significant investor redemptions out of the trusts before the scheduled maturity of the underlying securities or significant credit default issues of the securities held within the trusts’ portfolios could change the company’s estimation of likelihood of funding. No payments havepayment has been made under either agreement nor has Invesco realized any lossesloss from the support agreements through the date of this Report. These trusts were not consolidated because the company was not deemed to be the primary beneficiary. As of the date of this Report, the committed support under these agreements was $36.0 million.

69


Contractual Obligations
     We have various financial obligations that require future cash payments. The following table outlines the timing of payment requirements related to our commitments as of December 31, 2009:2010:
           
                     Within 1-3 3-5 More Than
$ in millions Total(4)(5) Within 1
Year
 1-3
Years
 3-5
Years
 More Than
5 Years
 Total(4)(5) 1 Year Years Years 5 Years
Total debt 745.7  215.1 530.6   1,315.7  1,118.6 197.1  
Estimated interest payments on total debt(1)
 136.9 40.6 72.7 23.6   116.0 48.4 57.0 10.6  
Finance leases 0.1 0.1    
Operating leases(2)
 593.4 61.1 110.7 100.7 320.9  671.6 67.7 128.9 125.5 349.5 
Defined benefit pension and postretirement medical obligations(3)
 378.7 8.5 19.4 22.2 328.6  388.5 9.0 20.0 23.0 336.5 
                      
Total 1,854.8 110.3 417.9 677.1 649.5  2,604.7 135.0 1,344.4 375.6 749.7 
                      
 
(1) Total debt includes $745.7 million of fixed rate debt. Fixed interest payments are therefore reflected in the table above in the periods they are due. The credit facility, $500.0$570.0 million at December 31, 2009,2010, provides for borrowings of various maturities. Interest is payable based upon LIBOR, Prime, Federal Funds or other bank-provided rates in existence at the time of each borrowing.
 
(2) Operating leases reflect obligations for leased building space and sponsorship and naming rights agreements. See Item 8, “FinancialFinancial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 18, Operating14, “Operating Leases” for sublease information.
 
(3) The defined benefit obligation of $378.7$388.5 million is comprised of $330.2$336.1 million related to pension plans and $48.5$52.4 million related to a postretirement medical plan. The fair value of plan assets at December 31, 2009,2010, was $262.9$286.0 million for the retirement plan and $7.3$8.1 million for the medical plan. See Item 8, “FinancialFinancial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 19, Retirement13, “Retirement Benefit Plans” for detailed benefit pension and postretirement plan information.
 
(4) Other contingent payments at December 31, 2009,2010, include up to $500.0 million related to the PowerShares acquisition and $110.0$40.9 million related to the WL Ross & Co. acquisition, which are excluded until such time as they are probable and reasonably estimable. Additionally, the company has capital commitments into co-invested funds that are to be drawn down over the life of the partnership as investment opportunities are identified. At December 31, 2010, the company’s undrawn capital commitments were $136.4 million. See Note 19, “Commitments and Contingencies” for additional details. Contingent commitments also include an acquired liability for deferred structuring fees of $20.8 million. See Note 2, “Business Combination and Integration” for additional details.
 
(5) Due to the uncertainty with respect to the timing of future cash flows associated with unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2009,2010, the company is unable to make reasonably reliable estimates of the period of cash settlement with the respective taxing authorities. Therefore, $39.0$27.1 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits have been excluded from the contractual obligations table above. See Item 8, “FinancialFinancial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 1416Taxation”“Taxation” for a discussion on income taxes.

50


Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
     Our significant accounting policies are disclosed in Item 8, “FinancialFinancial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 1, Accounting“Accounting Policies” to our Consolidated Financial Statements. The accounting policies and estimates that we believe are the most critical to an understanding of our results of operations and financial condition are those that require complex management judgment regarding matters that are highly uncertain at the time policies were applied and estimates were made. These accounting policies and estimates are discussed below. Different estimates reasonably could have been used in the current period that would have had a material effect on these financial statements, and changes in these estimates are likely to occur from period-to-period in the future.
Share-Based Compensation.We have issued equity-settled share-based awards to certain employees, which are measured at fair value at the date of grant. These awards consist of restricted share awards (RSAs), restricted share units (RSUs) and share option awards. Time-vested awards vest ratably over or cliff-vest at the end of a period of continued employee service. Performance-vested awards cliff-vest at the end of a defined vesting period of continued employee service upon the company’s attainment of certain performance criteria, generally the attainment of cumulative EPS growth targets at the end of the vesting period reflecting a compound annual growth rate of between 10.0% and 15.0% per annum during a three-year period. Time-vested and performance-vested share awards are granted in the form of RSAs or RSUs. Dividends accrue directly to the employee holder of RSAs, and cash payments in lieu of dividends are made to employee holders of certain RSUs. There is therefore no discount to the fair value of these share awards at their grant date.
     The fair value of these awards is determined at the grant date and is expensed, based on the company’s estimate of shares that will eventually vest, on a straight-line or accelerated basis over the vesting period. The forfeiture rate applied to most grants is 5% per annum, based upon our historical experience with respect to employee turnover. Fair value for RSAs and RSUs representing equity interests identical to those associated with shares traded in the open market are determined using the market price at the time of grant. Fair value is measured by use of the Black Scholes valuation model for certain RSUs that do not include dividend rights and a stochastic model (a lattice-based model) for share option awards. The expected life of share-based payment awards used in these models is adjusted, based on management’s best estimate, for the effects of non-transferability, exercise restrictions, and behavioral considerations.
     Changes in the assumptions used in the stochastic valuation model for share option awards, as well as changes in the company’s estimates of vesting (including the company’s evaluation of performance conditions associated with certain share-based payment awards and assumptions used in determining award lapse rates) could have a material impact on the share-based payment charge recorded in each year. There have been no grants of share options since 2005.
     The table below is a summary, as of December 31, 2009, of equity-settled share-based compensation awards outstanding under the company’s share-based compensation programs. Details relating to each program are included in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 17, Share-Based Compensation.”
                         
  Awards Outstanding Vesting During The Years Ended December 31,
  Total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Millions of shares
                        
Time-vested  17.0   4.9   7.3   2.3   2.4   0.1 
Performance-vested  2.0   1.7*  0.3          
                         
Share Awards*  19.0   6.6   7.6   2.3   2.4   0.1 
                         
*Included in these share awards are 1.4 million awards which lapsed in January 2010, as it was determined that the performance conditions had not been achieved.
Other Compensation Arrangements.We offer certain performance-based cash awards to many of our employees that are based upon purely discretionary determinations or, alternatively, certain formulaic compensation arrangements. The formulaic arrangements require that we monitor on an ongoing basis whether or not pre-established metrics are expected to be met in order to properly record the related expense amounts. Because many of the metrics relate to matters that are highly uncertain or susceptible to change, our estimates may not accurately reflect the ultimate outcomes that will be achieved, and associated expense that should be recognized, with respect to these compensation arrangements.

51


     Taxation.We operate in several countries and several states through our various subsidiaries, and must allocate our income, expenses, and earnings under the various laws and regulations of each of these taxing jurisdictions. Accordingly, our provision for income taxes represents our total estimate of the liability that we have incurred for doing business each year in all of our locations. Annually we file tax returns that represent our filing positions within each jurisdiction and settle our return liabilities. Each jurisdiction has the right to audit those returns and may take different positions with respect to income and expense allocations and taxable earnings determinations. Because the determinations of our annual provisions are subject to judgments and estimates, it is possible that actual results will vary from those recognized in our financial statements. As a result, it is likely that additions to, or reductions of, income tax expense will occur each year for prior reporting periods as actual tax returns and tax audits are settled.

70


     Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and the reported amounts in the Consolidated Financial Statements, using the statutory tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the results of operations in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized.
     As a multinational corporation, the company operates in various locations around the world and we generate substantially all of our earnings from our subsidiaries. Under ASC 740-30, deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxes that would be payable on the unremitted earnings of the company’s subsidiaries, consolidated investment products, and joint ventures, except where it is our intention to and we continue to indefinitely reinvest the undistributed earnings. Our Canadian and U.S. subsidiaries continue to be directly owned by Invesco Holding Company Limited (formerly INVESCO PLC, our predecessor company), which is directly owned by Invesco Ltd. Our Canadian unremitted earnings, for which we are indefinitely reinvested, are estimated to be $1,131 million at December 31, 2010, compared with $1,016 million at December 31, 2009, compared with $953 million at December 31, 2008.2009. If distributed as a dividend, Canadian withholding tax of 5.0% would be due. Dividends from our investment in the U.S. should not give rise to additional tax as we are not subject to withholding tax between the U.S. and U.K. Deferred tax liabilities in the amount of $2.3$3.1 million (2008: $8.9(2009: $2.3 million) for additional tax have been recognized for unremitted earnings of certain subsidiaries that have regularly remitted earnings and are expected to continue to remit earnings in the foreseeable future. There is no additional tax on dividends from the U.K. to Bermuda.
     Net deferred tax assets have been recognized in the U.S., U.K., and Canada based on management’s belief that taxable income of the appropriate character, more likely than not, will be sufficient to realize the benefits of these assets over time. In the event that actual results differ from our expectations, or if our historical trends of positive operating income in any of these locations changes, we may be required to record a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, which may have a significant effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
     The company utilizes a specific recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The prescribed two-step process for evaluating a tax position involves first determining whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authorities. If it is, the second step then requires a company to measure this tax position benefit as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The company recognizes any interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits on the Consolidated Statements of Income as components of income tax expense.
     Goodwill.Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the net of the amounts assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed and is recorded in the functional currency of the acquired entity. Goodwill is tested for impairment at the single reporting unit level on an annual basis, or more often if events or circumstances indicate that impairment may exist. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value (the first step of the goodwill impairment test), then the second step is performed to determine if goodwill is impaired and to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any. The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying amount of goodwill. If the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The company’s annual goodwill impairment review is performed as of October 1 of each year. As a result of that analysis, the company determined that no impairment existed at that date. Our goodwill impairment testing conducted during 2010 and 2009 indicated that the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded its carrying value, indicating that step two of the goodwill impairment test was not necessary.
     We have determined that we have one operating and reportable segment. The company evaluated the components of its business, which are business units one level below the operating segment level, and has determined that it has one reporting unit for purposes of goodwill impairment testing. The company’s components business units one level below the operating segment level, include Invesco Worldwide Institutional, Invesco North American Retail, Invesco Perpetual, Invesco Continental Europe and Invesco Asia Pacific. None of the company’s components are considered individual reporting units as complete operating results are not available for each separate component. The company’s operating segment represents one reporting unit because all of the components are similar due to the common nature of products and services offered, type of clients, methods of

52


distribution, regulatory environments, manner in which each component is operated, extent to which they share assets and resources, and the extent to which they support and benefit from common product development efforts. Traditional profit and loss measures are not produced, and therefore not reviewed by component management, for any of the components. Furthermore, the financial information that is available by component is not sufficient for purposes of performing a discounted cash flow analysis at the component level in order to test goodwill for impairment at that level. As none of our components are reporting units, we have determined that our single operating segment, investment management, is also our single reporting unit.

71


     The principal method of determining fair value of the reporting unit is an income approach where future cash flows are discounted to arrive at a single present value amount. The discount rate used is derived based on the time value of money and the risk profile of the stream of future cash flows. Recent results and projections based on expectation regarding revenues, expenses, capital expenditures and acquisition earn out payments produce a present value for the reporting unit. While the company believes all assumptions utilized in our assessment are reasonable and appropriate, changes in these estimates could produce different fair value amounts and therefore different goodwill impairment assessments. The most sensitive of these assumptions are the estimated cash flows and the use of a weighted average cost of capital as the discount rate to determine present value. The present value produced for the reporting unit is the fair value of the reporting unit. This amount is reconciled to the company’s market capitalization to determine an implied control premium, which is compared to an analysis of historical control premiums experienced by peer companies over a long period of time to assess the reasonableness of the fair value of the reporting unit.
     The company also utilizes a market approach to provide a secondary and corroborative fair value of the reporting unit by using comparable company and transaction multiples to estimate values for our single reporting unit. Discretion and judgment is required in determining whether the transaction data available represents information for companies of comparable nature, scope and size. The results of the secondary market approach to provide a fair value estimate are not combined or weighted with the results of the income approach described above but are used to provide an additional basis to determine the reasonableness of the income approach fair value estimate.
     The company cannot predict the occurrence of future events that might adversely affect the reported value of goodwill that totaled $6,467.6$6,980.2 million and $5,966.8$6,467.6 million at December 31, 2009,2010 and December 31, 2008,2009, respectively. Such events include, but are not limited to, strategic decisions made in response to economic and competitive conditions, the impact of the economic environment on the company’s assets under management, or any other material negative change in assets under management and related management fees. The company’s annual goodwill impairment review is performed as of October 1 of each year. As a result of that analysis, the company determined that no impairment existed at that date. Our goodwill impairment testing conducted during 2009 and 2008 indicated that the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded its carrying value, indicating that step two of the goodwill impairment test was not necessary.
     Due to deteriorating market conditions, interim impairment tests were performed at October 31, 2008, and March 31, 2009, using the most recently available operating information. These interim tests also concluded that no impairment had occurred. Following the March 31, 2009, interim test, the general market conditions improved and the company did not identify the need for further interim tests during 2009 as no indicators of impairment existed. The March 31, 2009, interim impairment test adopted an income approach consistent with the annual 2008 impairment tests, but utilized the company’s updated forecasts for changes in AUM due to market gains and long-term net flows and the corresponding changes in revenues and expenses. The primary assumption changes from the October 31, 2008, valuation test were increases in the anticipated rise in equity markets in the near-term and in net AUM sales. The increase in equity markets was based on an analysis of the Dow Jones Industrial Average for 10 recession events between 1945 and 2001. The October 31, 2008, valuation had assumed an equity market rise in-line with more normal non-recessionary experience. The higher AUM net sales reflects new flows into the equity markets as values stabilize and confidence returns, and also took into account the company’s improved relative investment performance. A discount rate of 13.7% was used for the March 31, 2009, test, similar to the October 31, 2008, rate of 13.6% (October 1, 2008: 11.6%). The discount rates used are estimates of the weighted average cost of capital for the assetinvestment management sector reflecting the overall industry risks associated with future cash flows and have been calculated consistently across the various tests dates.
     The October 1, 2009, annual goodwill impairment test was performed using a consistent methodology to that used for the March 31, 2009, interim impairment test, with the exception that adjustments were made to remove the near-term equity market rise assumption, since much of the market rebound had been experienced in the period between March 31, 2009, and October 1, 2009. A discount rate of 12.9% was used for the October 1, 2009, analysis. A 40% decline in the fair value of our reporting unit, or a 500 basis point increase in the discount rate assumption used during our October 1, 2009, goodwill impairment analysis, would have caused the carrying value of our reporting unit to be in excess of its fair value, which would require the second step of the goodwill impairment test to be performed.performed, which would have required a comparison of the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying amount of goodwill. The second step could have resulted in an impairment loss for goodwill.
     The October 1, 2010 annual goodwill impairment test was performed using a consistent methodology to that used for the 2009 annual impairment test, with assumptions updated for current market conditions. The most significant change in assumptions from 2009 related to an increase in the market risk premium, which resulted in a discount rate of 14.9% for the October 1, 2010 analysis. A 43% decline in market value or a 700 basis point increase in the discount rate assumption used during our October 1, 2010 goodwill impairment analysis would be required to cause the carrying value of the reporting unit to be in excess of the market value, thus triggering step two of the goodwill impairment test. The second step could have resulted in an impairment loss for goodwill.

72


Intangible Assets.Intangible assets identified on the acquisition of a business are capitalized separately from goodwill if the fair value can be measured reliably on initial recognition (transaction date) and, if they are determined to be finite-lived, are amortized and recorded as operating expenses on a straight-line basis over their useful lives, from two to 12 years, which reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits are realized. The company considers its own assumptions, which require management’s judgment, about renewal or extension of the term of the arrangement, consistent with its expected use of the asset. A change in the useful life of an intangible asset could have a significant impact on the company’s amortization expense.
     Where evidence exists that the underlying management contracts have a high likelihood of continued renewal at little or no cost to the company, the intangible asset is assigned an indefinite life and reviewed for impairment on an annual basis. The company reevaluates the useful life determination for intangible assets each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining useful life or an indication of impairment. The indicators in ASC Topic 350-30 paragraphs 35-23 and 24 were considered in making the determination that the indefinite-lived intangibles that arose from the June 1, 2010, acquisition of Morgan Stanley’s retail asset management business comprise one unit of account for impairment testing purposes. None of the indicators were considered presumptive or determinative; however, due to the fact that the retail fund management contracts are managed under Invesco’s single retail branding strategy and are used by various business components within the organization, the single unit of account was deemed appropriate.
     Definite-lived intangibles are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable (i.e. carrying amount exceeds the sum of the fair value of the intangible). Intangible assets not subject to amortization are tested for impairment annually as of October 1 or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The impairment test consists of a comparison of the fair value of an intangible asset with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of the intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. Fair value is generally determined using an income approach where estimated future cash flows are discounted to arrive at a single present value amount. The income approach includes inputs that require significant management judgment, including discount rates, revenue multiples and AUM growth rates. Changes in these estimates could produce different fair value amounts and therefore different impairment conclusions.
     Investments.Most of our investments are carried at fair value on our balance sheet with the periodic mark-to-market recorded either in accumulated other comprehensive income in the case of available-for-sale investments or directly to earnings in the case of trading assets. Fair value is generally determined by reference to an active trading market, using quoted close or bid prices as of each

53


reporting period end. When a readily ascertainable market value does not exist for an investment, (such as our collateralized loan obligations, or CLOs, discussed below) the fair value is calculated based on the expected cash flows of its underlying net asset base, taking into account applicable discount rates and other factors. Since assumptions are made in determining the fair values of investments for which active markets do not exist, the actual value that may be realized upon the sale or other disposition of these investments could differ from the current carrying values. Fair value calculations are also required in association with our quarterly impairment testing of investments. The accuracy of our other-than-temporary impairment assessments is dependent upon the extent to which we are able to accurately determine fair values. Of our $339.8$473.2 million total investments at December 31, 2009,2010, those most susceptible to impairment include $74.8$99.5 million seed money investments in our affiliated funds and $17.9 million invested in CLO products.funds. Seed money investments are investments held in Invesco managed funds with the purpose of providing capital to the funds during their development periods. These investments are recorded at fair value using quoted market prices in active markets; there is no modeling or additional information needed to arrive at the fair values of these investments.
     The value of investments may decline for various reasons. The market price may be affected by general market conditions which reflect prospects for the economy as a whole or by specific information pertaining to an industry or individual company. Such declines require further investigation by management, which considers all available evidence to evaluate the realizable value of the investment, including, but not limited to, the following factors:
The probability that the company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of a debt security not impaired at acquisition;
The length of time and the extent to which the market value has been less than cost;
The financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, including any specific events which may influence the operations of the issuer;
The intent and ability of the company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value;

73


The length of time and the extent to which the market value has been less than cost;
The financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, including any specific events which may influence the operations of the issuer such as changes in technology that may impair the earnings potential of the investment or the discontinuance of a component of the business that may affect the future earnings potential;
The intent and ability of the company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value;
The decline in the security’s value due to an increase in market interest rates or a change in foreign exchange rates since acquisition;
Determination that the security is not realizable; or
An adverse change in estimated cash flows of a beneficial interest.
The decline in the security’s value due to an increase in market interest rates or a change in foreign exchange rates since acquisition;
Determination that the security is not realizable; or
An adverse change in estimated cash flows of a beneficial interest.
     Our other-than-temporary impairment analysis of seed money holdings includes a review of the market returns required for each fund portfolio to enable us to recover our original investment. As part of the review, we analyze several scenarios to project the anticipated recovery period of our original investments based on one-, three-, and five-year historical index returns and historical trends in the equity markets. We also analyze the absolute amount of any loss to date, the trend of the losses, and percent declines in values of the seed money investments. Along with intent and ability to hold, all of these scenarios are considered as part of our other-than-temporary impairment analysis of seed money holdings.
     The company provides investment management services to a number of CLOs. These entities are investment vehicles created for the sole purpose of issuing CLO instruments that offer investors the opportunity for returns that vary with the risk level of their investment. The notes issued by the CLOs are backed by diversified portfolios consisting primarily of loans or structured debt. For managing the collateral for the CLO entities, the company earns investment management fees, including in some cases subordinated management fees, as well as in certain cases contingent incentive fees. The company has invested in certain of the entities, generally taking a relatively small portion of the unrated, junior subordinated position. At December 31, 2009, the company held $17.9 million of investment in these CLOs (December 31, 2008: $17.5 million), which represents its maximum risk of loss. Our investments in CLOs are generally subordinated to other interests in the entity and entitle the investor to receive the residual cash flows, if any, from the entity. As a result, the company’s investment is sensitive to changes in the credit quality of the issuers of the collateral securities, including changes in forecasted default rates and declines in anticipated recovery rates. Investors in CLOs have no recourse against the company for any losses sustained in the CLO structure.
     The company has recorded its investments at fair value primarily using an income approach. Fair value is determined using current information, notably market yields and projected cash flows based on forecasted default and recovery rates that a market participant would use in determining the current fair value of the equity interest. Market yields, default rates and recovery rates used in the

54


company’s estimate of fair value vary based on the nature of the investments in the underlying collateral pools. In periods of rising market yields, default rates and lower debt recovery rates, the fair value, and therefore carrying value, of the company’s investments in these CLO entities may be adversely affected. The current liquidity constraints within the market for CLO products require the use of unobservable inputs for CLO valuation. The excess of actual and anticipated future cash flows over the initial investment at the date of purchase is recognized as interest income over the life of the investment using the effective yield method. The company reviews cash flow estimates throughout the life of each CLO entity. Cash flow estimates are based on the underlying pool of securities and take into account the overall credit quality of the issuers, the forecasted default rate of the securities and the company’s past experience in managing similar securities. If the updated estimate of future cash flows (taking into account both timing and amounts) is less than the last revised estimate, an impairment loss is recognized based on the excess of the carrying amount of the investment over the updated estimate of future cash flows and is recorded through the income statement.
     As discussed in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 1, Accounting Policies,” the company adopted FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments” (FSP FAS 115-2), now encompassed in ASC Topic 320, “Investments — Debt and Equity Securities” (ASC Topic 320), on April 1, 2009. As a result of FSP FAS 115-2, credit-related impairment is recorded through the Statement of Income, and non-credit related impairment is recorded through other comprehensive income. Upon adoption, the company recorded a cumulative effect adjustment of $1.5 million to the April 1, 2009, opening balance of retained earnings with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income representing the non-credit component of previously recognized other-than-temporary impairment. During the year ended December 31, 2009, an additional $5.2 million was recorded as a charge to earnings representing the credit-related other-than-temporary impairment during the period, and an additional $0.3 million was recorded as a charge to other comprehensive income from other-than-temporary impairment related to non-credit related factors, primarily the change in discount rates during the period. An increase or decrease in the discount rate of 1.0% would change the discounted cash flows of the CLOs by $0.6 million as of December 31, 2009.
Consolidated Investment Products.The primary beneficiary of variable interest entities (VIEs) consolidate the VIEs. A VIE is an entity that does not have sufficient equity to finance its operations without additional subordinated financial support, or an entity for which the risks and rewards of ownership are not directly linked to voting interests. The company provides investment management services to, and has transactions with, various private equity funds, real estate funds, fund-of-funds, CLOs, and other investment entities sponsored by the company for the investment of client assets in the normal course of business. The company serves as the investment manager, making day-to-day investment decisions concerning the assets of the products. Certain of these entities are considered to be VIEs.
     For all investment funds with the exception of CLOs, if the company is deemed to have a variable interest in these entities, the company is deemed to be the fund’s primary beneficiary if the company has the majority of rewards/risks of ownership. For CLOs, if the company is deemed to have a variable interest in these entities, the company is deemed to be the fund’s primary beneficiary if it has the power to direct the activities of the CLO that most significantly impact the CLO’s economic performance, and the obligation to absorb losses/right to receive benefits from the CLO that could potentially be significant to the CLO.
     Assessing if an entity is a VIE or voting interest entity (VOE) involves judgment and analysis on a structure-by-structure basis. Factors included in this assessment include the legal organization of the entity, the company’s contractual involvement with the entity and any related party or de facto agent implications of the company’s involvement with the entity. Generally, limited partnership entities where the general partner does not have substantive equity investment at risk and where the other limited partners do not have substantive (greater than 50%) rights to remove the general partner or to dissolve the limited partnership are also VIEs. The primary beneficiary is the party to the VIE who absorbs a majority of the losses or retains the majority of the rewards generated by the VIE. Additionally, certain investment products are voting interest entities (VOEs)VOEs and are structured as limited partnerships of which the company is the general partner and is deemed to have control with the lack of substantive kick-out, liquidation or participation rights of the other limited partners. These investment products are also consolidated into the company’s financial statements.
     Assessing if an entity is a VIE or VOE involves judgment and analysis on a structure-by-structure basis. Factors included in this assessment include the legal organization of the entity, the company’s contractual involvement with the entity and any related party or de facto agent implications of the company’s involvement with the entity. Determining if the company is the primary beneficiary of a VIE also requires significant judgment, as the calculation of expected losses and residual returns (for investment products other than CLOs) involves estimation and probability assumptions. For CLOs, there is judgment involved to assess if the company has the power to direct the activities that most significantly effect the CLOs economic results and to assess if the company’s interests could be deemed significant. If current financial statements are not available for consolidated VIEs or VOEs, estimation of investment valuation is required, which includes assessing available quantitative and qualitative data. Significant changes in these estimates could impact the reported value of the investments held by consolidated investment products and the related offsetting equity attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and the other gains and losses of consolidated investment products, net, and related offsetting gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities, net, amounts on the Consolidated Statements of Income.
     As of December 31, 2009,2010 the company consolidated VIEs that held investments of $67.9$6,264.2 million (December 31, 2008: $141.92009: $67.9 million) and VOEs that heldVOE fund investments of $617.1$941.3 million (December 31, 2008: $701.92009: $617.1 million). As circumstances supporting estimates and factors change, the determination of VIE and primary beneficiary status may change, as could the determination of the necessity to consolidateof consolidation of VOEs.
     Contingencies.Contingencies arise when we have a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event that is both probable and reasonably estimable. We must from time to time make material estimates with respect to legal and other contingencies. The nature of our business requires compliance with various state and federal statutes, as well as various contractual obligations, and exposes us to a variety of legal proceedings and matters in the ordinary course of business. While the outcomes of matters such as these are inherently uncertain and difficult to predict, we maintain reserves reflected in other current and other non-current liabilities,

74


as appropriate, for identified losses that are, in our judgment, probable and reasonably estimable. Management’s judgment is based on the advice of legal counsel, ruling on various motions by the applicable court, review of the outcome of similar matters, if applicable, and review of guidance from state or federal agencies, if applicable. Contingent consideration payable in relation to a business acquisition is recorded as of the acquisition date as part of the fair value transferred in exchange for the acquired business.

55


Recent Accounting DevelopmentsStandards
     See Part II, Item 8, “FinancialFinancial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 1, Accounting“Accounting Policies — Accounting Pronouncements Recently Adopted and RecentPending Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted.Pronouncements.
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
     In the normal course of its business, the company is primarily exposed to market risk in the form of securities market risk, interest rate risk, and foreign exchange rate risk.
AUM Market Price Risk
     The company’s investment management revenues are comprised of fees based on a percentage of the value of AUM. Declines in equity or fixed income security market prices could cause revenues to decline because of lower investment management fees by:
Causing the value of AUM to decrease.
Causing the returns realized on AUM to decrease (impacting performance fees).
Causing clients to withdraw funds in favor of investments in markets that they perceive to offer greater opportunity and that the company does not serve.
Causing clients to rebalance assets away from investments that the company manages into investments that the company does not manage.
Causing clients to reallocate assets away from products that earn higher revenues into products that earn lower revenues.
Causing the value of AUM to decrease.
Causing the returns realized on AUM to decrease (impacting performance fees).
Causing clients to withdraw funds in favor of investments in markets that they perceive to offer greater opportunity and that the company does not serve.
Causing clients to rebalance assets away from investments that the company manages into investments that the company does not manage.
Causing clients to reallocate assets away from products that earn higher revenues into products that earn lower revenues.
     Underperformance of client accounts relative to competing products could exacerbate these factors.
Securities Market Risk
     The company has investments in sponsored investment products that invest in a variety of asset classes. Investments are generally made to establish a track record or to hedge economically hedge exposure to certain deferred compensation plans. The company’s exposure to market risk arises from its investments. The following table summarizes the fair values of the investments exposed to market risk and provides a sensitivity analysis of the estimated fair values of those investments, assuming a 20% increase or decrease in fair values:
                        
 Fair Value Fair Value Fair Value Fair Value
 Carrying assuming 20% assuming 20% Carrying assuming 20% assuming 20%
$ in millions Value increase decrease Value increase decrease
December 31, 2009
 
December 31, 2010
 
Trading investments:  
Investments related to deferred compensation plans 84.6 101.5 67.7  165.5 198.6 132.4 
Available-for-sale investments:  
Seed money in affiliated funds 74.8 89.8 59.8  99.5 119.4 79.6 
Equity method investments 134.7 161.6 107.8  156.9 188.3 125.5 
Other 5.3 6.4 4.2  7.5 9.0 6.0 
              
Total market risk on investments 299.4 359.3 239.5  429.4 515.3 343.5 
              

5675


                        
 Fair Value Fair Value Fair Value Fair Value
 Carrying assuming 20% assuming 20% Carrying assuming 20% assuming 20%
$ in millions Value increase decrease Value increase decrease
December 31, 2008
 
December 31, 2009
 
Trading investments:  
Investments related to deferred compensation plans 35.5 42.6 28.4  84.6 101.5 67.7 
Other 0.7 0.8 0.6 
       
Total trading investments 36.2 43.4 29.0 
       
Available-for-sale investments:  
Seed money in affiliated funds 69.1 82.9 55.3  74.8 89.8 59.8 
Equity method investments 134.7 161.6 107.8 
Other 8.5 10.2 6.8  5.3 6.4 4.2 
Equity method investments 95.3 114.4 76.2 
              
Total market risk on investments 209.1 250.9 167.3  299.4 359.3 239.5 
              
Interest Rate Risk
     Interest rate risk relates to the risk that the fair value of future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates. The company is exposed to interest rate risk primarily through its external debt and cash and cash equivalent investments. On December 31, 2009,2010, the interest rates on 100%56.7% of the company’s borrowings were fixed for a weighted average period of 3.42.4 years. Borrowings under the credit facility will have floating interest rates. The interest rate profile of the financial assets of the company on December 31, 2009,2010, was:
                        
 Fair Value Fair Value Fair Value Fair Value
 assuming a assuming a assuming a assuming a
 Carrying +1% interest -1% interest Carrying +1% interest -1% interest
$ in millions Value rate change rate change Value rate change rate change
December 31, 2010
 
Available-for-sale investments: 
Collateralized loan obligations 0.5 0.5 0.5 
Foreign time deposits 28.2 28.3 28.2 
       
Total investments 28.7 28.3 28.2 
       
December 31, 2009
  
Available-for-sale investments:  
Collateralized loan obligations 17.9 18.5 17.3  17.9 18.5 17.3 
Foreign time deposits 22.5 22.6 22.5  22.5 22.6 22.5 
              
Total investments 40.4 41.1 39.8  40.4 41.1 39.8 
              
December 31, 2008
 
Available-for-sale investments: 
Collateralized loan obligations 17.5 17.0 18.0 
Foreign time deposits 17.3 17.2 17.3 
Other 1.0 1.0 1.0 
       
Total investments 35.8 35.2 36.3 
       
     The interest rate profile of the financial liabilities of the company on December 31 was:
                                        
 Weighted Weighted Average Weighted Weighted Average
 Average Period for Which Average Period for Which
 Interest Rate is Fixed Interest Rate is Fixed
$ in millions Total Floating Rate Fixed Rate* Rate (%) (Years) Total Floating Rate Fixed Rate* Rate (%) (Years)
2010
 
Currency: 
U.S. dollar 1,315.7 570.0 745.7  4.3% 2.4 
           
 
2009
  
Currency:  
U.S. dollar 745.7  745.7  5.1% 3.4  745.7  745.7  5.1% 3.4 
Japanese yen 0.1  0.1  9.7% 1.3  0.1  0.1  9.7% 1.3 
                      
 745.8  745.8  5.1% 3.4  745.8  745.8  5.1% 3.4 
           
 
2008
 
Currency: 
U.S. dollar 1,159.2 12.0 1,147.2  4.9% 3.4 
Japanese yen 0.3  0.3  9.1% 2.1 
           
 1,159.5 12.0 1,147.5  4.9% 3.4 
 
* Measured at amortized cost.

5776


     See Item 8, “FinancialFinancial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 9, Debt”“Debt” for additional disclosures relating to the U.S. dollar floating and fixed rate obligations.
     The company’s only fixed interest financial assets at December 31, 2009,2010, are foreign time deposit investments of $22.5$28.2 million (2008: $17.3(2009: $22.5 million). The weighted average interest rate on these investments is 0.57% (2009: 0.74% (2008: 2.08%) and the weighted average time for which the rate is fixed is 0.4 years (2008:(2009: 0.4 years).
Foreign Exchange Rate Risk
     The company has transactional currency exposures that occur when any of the company’s subsidiaries receives or pays cash in a currency different from its functional currency. Such exposure arises from sales or purchases by an operating unit in currencies other than the unit’s functional currency. These exposures are not actively managed.
     The company also has certain investments in foreign operations, whose net assets and results of operations are exposed to foreign currency translation risk when translated into U.S. dollars upon consolidation into Invesco Ltd. The company does not hedge these exposures.
     The company is exposed to foreign exchange revaluation into the income statement on monetary assets and liabilities that are held by subsidiaries in different functional currencies than the subsidiaries’ functional currencies. Net foreign exchange revaluation gainslosses were $7.6$1.0 million in 2009 (2008: loss2010 (2009: gains of $10.7$7.6 million), and are included in general and administrative expenses and other gains and losses, net on the Consolidated Statements of Income. We continue to monitor our exposure to foreign exchange revaluation.

5877


Supplementary Quarterly Financial Data
     The following is selected unaudited consolidated data for Invesco Ltd. for the quarters ended:indicated:
                                                                
$ in millions, except per share data Q409 Q309 Q209 Q109 Q408 Q308 Q208 Q108  Q410 Q310 Q210 Q110 Q409 Q309 Q209 Q109 
Operating revenues:
  
Investment management fees $611.8 $570.3 $501.6 $436.5 $478.5 $664.9 $736.8 $737.6  $773.7 $725.8 $627.9 $593.5 $611.8 $570.3 $501.6 $436.5 
Service and distribution fees 111.4 111.8 100.4 89.0 101.4 129.4 143.3 138.4  202.0 191.6 139.4 112.5 111.4 111.8 100.4 89.0 
Performance fees 6.8 4.3 8.0 10.9 23.8 18.1 22.2 11.0  18.7 2.5�� 3.5 1.4 6.8 4.3 8.0 10.9 
Other 17.8 19.4 15.1 12.2 30.7 14.8 33.3 23.4  34.1 33.2 16.2 11.7 17.8 19.4 15.1 12.2 
                                  
Total operating revenues 747.8 705.8 625.1 548.6 634.4 827.2 935.6 910.4  1,028.5 953.1 787.0 719.1 747.8 705.8 625.1 548.6 
                                  
Operating expenses:
  
Employee compensation 247.1 238.9 229.0 235.8 236.0 264.1 282.9 272.8  312.7 304.1 260.5 237.6 247.1 238.9 229.0 235.8 
Third-party distribution, service and advisory 195.4 183.5 166.3 148.2 162.6 220.9 244.9 247.1  289.9 266.5 220.7 195.6 195.4 183.5 166.3 148.2 
Marketing 30.4 27.7 23.9 26.9 31.3 34.8 38.2 43.9  51.3 44.8 35.2 28.3 30.4 27.7 23.9 26.9 
Property, office and technology 54.8 63.0 48.6 45.9 58.0 50.5 55.7 50.1  65.6 63.5 55.8 53.5 54.8 63.0 48.6 45.9 
General and administrative 49.8 40.0 46.9 30.0 62.0 61.7 73.9 68.4  83.6 64.5 64.1 50.0 49.8 40.1 46.9 30.0 
Transaction and integration 9.8 1.0        26.7 26.8 79.3 17.2 9.8 1.0   
                                  
Total operating expenses 587.3 554.2 514.7 486.8 549.9 632.0 695.6 682.3  829.8 770.2 715.6 582.2 587.3 554.2 514.7 486.8 
                                  
Operating Income 160.5 151.6 110.4 61.8 84.5 195.2 240.0 228.1  198.7 182.9 71.4 136.9 160.5 151.6 110.4 61.8 
Other income/(expense):
  
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates 9.1 7.9 7.5 2.5 11.3 8.0 9.6 17.9  13.3 10.7 10.4 5.8 9.1 7.9 7.5 2.5 
Interest income 2.1 1.7 1.2 4.8 7.2 8.0 10.5 11.5  3.6 3.4 1.8 1.6 2.1 1.7 1.2 4.8 
Interest income of consolidated investment products 65.0 70.3 53.1 52.5     
Gains/(losses) of consolidated investment products, net 25.9 2.1  (48.4)  (86.5)  (56.8) 2.8 40.3  (44.3)  (28.0)  (148.3) 187.2 103.1 25.9 2.1  (48.4)  (86.5)
Interest expense  (15.2)  (16.9)  (16.5)  (15.9)  (17.8)  (18.3)  (19.3)  (21.5)  (16.0)  (16.1)  (14.1)  (12.4)  (15.2)  (16.9)  (16.5)  (15.9)
Interest expense of consolidated investment products  (36.6)  (35.6)  (25.6)  (20.8)     
                 
Other gains and losses, net  2.0 10.0  (4.2)  (21.9)  (10.4)  (1.1)  (6.5) 12.4 14.6  (9.3)  (2.1)  2.0 10.0  (4.2)
                                  
Income/(loss) before income taxes, including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests 182.4 148.4 64.2  (37.5) 6.5 185.3 280.0 185.2  212.4 81.9 274.9 264.6 182.4 148.4 64.2  (37.5)
Income tax provision  (48.2)  (43.7)  (36.0)  (20.3)  (35.8)  (49.2)  (77.2)  (73.8)  (55.7)  (54.5)  (36.7)  (50.1)  (48.2)  (43.7)  (36.0)  (20.3)
                                  
Net income/(loss), including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests 134.2 104.7 28.2  (57.8)  (29.3) 136.1 202.8 111.4  156.7 27.4 238.2 214.5 134.2 104.7 28.2  (57.8)
(Gains)/losses attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities, net  (23.3) 0.5 47.5 88.5 61.2  (4.3)  (40.0) 43.8  18.5 127.3  (197.4)  (119.5)  (23.3) 0.5 47.5 88.5 
                                  
Net income attributable to common shareholders $110.9 $105.2 $75.7 $30.7 $31.9 $131.8 $162.8 $155.2  $175.2 $154.7 $40.8 $95.0 $110.9 $105.2 $75.7 $30.7 
                                  
Earnings per share*:
  
— basic $0.26 $0.24 $0.18 $0.08 $0.08 $0.34 $0.42 $0.40  $0.37 $0.32 $0.09 $0.22 $0.26 $0.24 $0.18 $0.08 
— diluted $0.25 $0.24 $0.18 $0.08 $0.08 $0.33 $0.41 $0.39  $0.37 $0.32 $0.09 $0.21 $0.25 $0.24 $0.18 $0.08 
Average shares outstanding*:
  
— basic 434.1 431.6 410.6 394.1 386.3 388.4 390.1 390.0  470.5 476.6 455.0 439.0 434.1 431.6 410.6 394.1 
— diluted 440.1 437.7 416.8 399.9 394.8 399.3 400.7 400.8  473.1 479.1 457.8 442.4 440.1 437.7 416.8 399.9 
Dividends declared per share*:
 $0.1025 $0.1025 $0.1025 $0.10 $0.10 $0.10 $0.10 $0.22 
Dividends declared per share:
 $0.11 $0.11 $0.11 $0.1025 $0.1025 $0.1025 $0.1025 $0.10 
 
* Dividends declared represent amounts declared in the current quarter in respect of the prior quarter, with the exception of the $0.22 per share dividend declared in the first quarter of 2008. This dividend was attributable to the second half of 2007 and was declared when the company formerly declared semi-annual dividends. The sum of the quarterly earnings per share amounts may differ from the annual earnings per share amounts due to the required method of computing the weighted average number of shares in interim periods.

59

78



Annual Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
     Management of the company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). The company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
     Under the supervision and with the participation of the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009.2010. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2009.2010.
     The company’s independent auditors, Ernst & Young LLP, have issued an audit report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, which is included herein.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
     There were no changes in the company’s internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of 20092010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

6180


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Invesco Ltd.
     We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Invesco Ltd. (the Company) as of December 31, 20092010 and 2008,2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009.2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
     We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
     In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Invesco Ltd. at December 31, 20092010 and 2008,2009, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009,2010, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
     We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Invesco Ltd.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009,2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 26, 201025, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
February 26, 201025, 2011

6281


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Invesco Ltd.
     We have audited Invesco Ltd.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009,2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Invesco Ltd.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Annual Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
     We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
     A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
     Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
     In our opinion, Invesco Ltd. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009,2010, based on the COSO criteria.
     We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Invesco Ltd. as of December 31, 20092010 and 2008,2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009,2010, of Invesco Ltd. and our report dated February 26, 201025, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s / Ernst & Young LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
February 26, 201025, 2011

6382


Invesco Ltd.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
                
 As of As of 
 December 31, December 31, December 31, December 31, 
$ in millions 2009 2008
$ in millions, except per share data 2010 2009 
ASSETS
  
  
Current assets:
  
Cash and cash equivalents 762.0 585.2  740.5 762.0 
Cash and cash equivalents of consolidated investment products 28.0 73.0  636.7 28.0 
Unsettled fund receivables 383.1 303.7  513.4 383.1 
Accounts receivable 289.3 239.3  424.7 289.3 
Accounts receivable of consolidated investment products 158.8  
Investments 182.4 123.6  308.8 182.4 
Prepaid assets 57.6 55.6  64.0 57.6 
Other current assets 77.9 67.3  101.8 77.9 
Deferred tax asset, net 57.7 86.1  30.4 57.7 
Assets held for policyholders 1,283.0 840.2  1,295.4 1,283.0 
          
Total current assets 3,121.0 2,374.0  4,274.5 3,121.0 
Non-current assets:
  
Investments 157.4 121.3  164.4 157.4 
Investments of consolidated investment products 685.0 843.8  7,206.0 685.0 
Prepaid assets 16.2 36.3  0.9 16.2 
Security deposit assets and receivables 146.3  
Other non-current assets 13.0 4.9  20.0 13.0 
Deferred sales commissions 23.8 24.5  42.2 23.8 
Deferred tax asset, net 65.8 37.2   65.8 
Property and equipment, net 220.7 205.3  272.4 220.7 
Intangible assets, net 139.1 142.8  1,337.2 139.1 
Goodwill 6,467.6 5,966.8  6,980.2 6,467.6 
          
Total non-current assets 7,788.6 7,382.9  16,169.6 7,788.6 
          
Total assets 10,909.6 9,756.9  20,444.1 10,909.6 
          
  
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
  
  
Current liabilities:
  
Current maturities of total debt  297.2 
Unsettled fund payables 367.9 288.3  504.8 367.9 
Income taxes payable 82.8 37.9  72.2 82.8 
Other current liabilities 564.7 639.8  905.7 559.9 
Other current liabilities of consolidated investment products 486.4 4.8 
Policyholder payables 1,283.0 840.2  1,295.4 1,283.0 
          
Total current liabilities 2,298.4 2,103.4  3,264.5 2,298.4 
Non-current liabilities:
  
Long-term debt 745.7 862.0  1,315.7 745.7 
Long-term debt of consolidated investment products 5,865.4  
Deferred tax liabilities, net 229.0  
Security deposits payable 146.3  
Other non-current liabilities 244.7 195.3  262.3 244.7 
          
Total non-current liabilities 990.4 1,057.3  7,818.7 990.4 
          
Total liabilities 3,288.8 3,160.7  11,083.2 3,288.8 
          
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 20) 
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 19) 
Equity:
  
Equity attributable to common shareholders:  
Common shares ($0.20 par value; 1,050.0 million authorized; 459.5 million and 426.6 million shares issued as of December 31, 2009, and 2008, respectively) 91.9 85.3 
Common shares ($0.20 par value; 1,050.0 million authorized; 490.4 million and 459.5 million shares issued as of December 31, 2010, and 2009, respectively) 98.1 91.9 
Additional paid-in-capital 5,688.4 5,352.6  6,262.6 5,688.4 
Treasury shares  (892.4)  (1,128.9)  (991.5)  (892.4)
Retained earnings 1,631.4 1,476.3  1,904.4 1,631.4 
Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax 393.6  (95.8)
Retained earnings appropriated for investors in consolidated investment products 495.5  
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax 495.5 393.6 
          
Total equity attributable to common shareholders 6,912.9 5,689.5  8,264.6 6,912.9 
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities 707.9 906.7  1,096.3 707.9 
          
Total equity 7,620.8 6,596.2  9,360.9 7,620.8 
          
Total liabilities and equity 10,909.6 9,756.9  20,444.1 10,909.6 
          
See accompanying notes.

6483


Invesco Ltd.
Consolidated Statements of Income
                        
 Years Ended December 31,  Years Ended December 31, 
$ in millions, except per share data 2009 2008 2007  2010 2009 2008 
Operating revenues:
  
Investment management fees 2,120.2 2,617.8 3,080.1  2,720.9 2,120.2 2,617.8 
Service and distribution fees 412.6 512.5 593.1  645.5 412.6 512.5 
Performance fees 30.0 75.1 70.3  26.1 30.0 75.1 
Other 64.5 102.2 135.4  95.2 64.5 102.2 
              
Total operating revenues 2,627.3 3,307.6 3,878.9  3,487.7 2,627.3 3,307.6 
              
  
Operating expenses:
  
Employee compensation 950.8 1,055.8 1,137.6  1,114.9 950.8 1,055.8 
Third-party distribution, service and advisory 693.4 875.5 1,051.1  972.7 693.4 875.5 
Marketing 108.9 148.2 157.6  159.6 108.9 148.2 
Property, office and technology 212.3 214.3 242.5  238.4 212.3 214.3 
General and administrative 166.8 266.0 295.8  262.2 166.8 266.0 
Transaction and integration 10.8    150.0 10.8  
              
Total operating expenses 2,143.0 2,559.8 2,884.6  2,897.8 2,143.0 2,559.8 
              
  
Operating income 484.3 747.8 994.3  589.9 484.3 747.8 
              
  
Other income/(expense):
  
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates 27.0 46.8 48.1  40.2 27.0 46.8 
Interest income 9.8 37.2 48.5 
Interest and dividend income 10.4 9.8 37.2 
Interest income of consolidated investment products 240.9   
Gains/(losses) of consolidated investment products, net  (106.9)  (58.0) 214.3  114.0  (106.9)  (58.0)
Interest expense  (64.5)  (76.9)  (71.3)  (58.6)  (64.5)  (76.9)
Interest expense of consolidated investment products  (118.6)   
Other gains and losses, net 7.8  (39.9) 9.9  15.6 7.8  (39.9)
              
Income before income taxes, including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests 357.5 657.0 1,243.8  833.8 357.5 657.0 
Income tax provision  (148.2)  (236.0)  (357.3)  (197.0)  (148.2)  (236.0)
              
Net income, including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests 209.3 421.0 886.5  636.8 209.3 421.0 
(Gains)/losses attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities, net 113.2 60.7  (212.9)  (171.1) 113.2 60.7 
              
  
Net income attributable to common shareholders 322.5 481.7 673.6  465.7 322.5 481.7 
              
  
Earnings per share:
  
— basic $0.77 $1.24 $1.68  $1.01 $0.77 $1.24 
— diluted $0.76 $1.21 $1.64  $1.01 $0.76 $1.21 
Dividends declared per share $0.4075 $0.520 $0.372  $0.4325 $0.4075 $0.520 
See accompanying notes.

6584


Invesco Ltd.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
                        
 Years Ended December 31, Years Ended December 31, 
$ in millions 2009 2008 2007 2010 2009 2008 
Operating activities:
  
Net income, including losses attributable to noncontrolling interests of $106.9 million in 2009 (losses of $58.0 million in 2008; gains of $214.3 million in 2007) 209.3 421.0 886.5 
Net income, including gains attributable to noncontrolling interests of $171.1 million in 2010 (losses of $113.2 million in 2009; losses of $60.7 million in 2008) 636.8 209.3 421.0 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:  
Amortization and depreciation 77.6 67.6 84.1  96.7 77.6 67.6 
Share-based compensation expense 90.8 97.7 105.2  117.8 90.8 97.7 
Gains on disposal of property, equipment, software, net  (1.2)  (2.0)  (1.1)
Gains on disposal of property, equipment, and software, net   (1.2)  (2.0)
Purchase of trading investments  (41.9)  (22.0)  (24.2)  (7,093.1)  (41.9)  (22.0)
Sale of trading investments 13.1 22.3 24.6 
Proceeds from sale of trading investments 7,032.7 13.1 22.3 
Other gains and losses, net  (7.8) 39.9  (9.9)  (15.6)  (7.8) 39.9 
(Gains)/losses of consolidated investment products, net 106.9 58.0  (214.3)  (114.0) 106.9 58.0 
Tax benefit from share-based compensation 42.3 54.9 38.2  63.4 42.3 54.9 
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation  (9.4)  (16.8)  (23.1)  (14.8)  (9.4)  (16.8)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates  (27.0)  (46.8)  (48.1)  (40.2)  (27.0)  (46.8)
Dividends from unconsolidated affiliates 28.3 29.8 1.8  26.0 28.3 29.8 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:  
Change in cash and cash equivalents held by consolidated investment products 45.0  (37.1)  (4.8)
(Increase)/decrease in cash held by consolidated investment products  (336.2) 45.0  (37.1)
Decrease/(increase)in receivables  (468.4) 1,118.8  (79.6)  (223.3)  (468.4) 1,118.8 
(Decrease)/increase in payables 305.1  (1,259.8) 180.2  243.0 305.1  (1,259.8)
              
Net cash provided by operating activities 362.7 525.5 915.5  379.2 362.7 525.5 
              
  
Investing activities:
  
Purchase of property and equipment  (39.5)  (84.1)  (36.7)  (89.6)  (39.5)  (84.1)
Disposal of property and equipment 6.8 0.2 12.1   6.8 0.2 
Purchase of available-for-sale investments  (50.3)  (109.4)  (80.3)  (33.9)  (15.6)  (71.1)
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale investments 49.7 84.5 111.8  64.7 18.8 41.0 
Purchase of investments by consolidated investment products  (44.1)  (112.3)  (331.5)  (2,367.7)  (44.1)  (112.3)
Proceeds from sale of investments by consolidated investment products 34.2 188.7 143.6  2,784.8 34.2 188.7 
Returns of capital in investments of consolidated investment products 17.9 99.2 196.0  81.5 17.9 99.2 
Purchase of other investments  (53.8)  (27.1)  (25.9)  (69.4)  (88.5)  (65.4)
Proceeds from sale of other investments 10.9 36.2 17.1  42.4 31.8 68.9 
Returns of capital and distributions from equity method investments 25.3 10.0 10.8 
Acquisitions of businesses (cash paid $826.8 million, less cash acquired $77.2 million)  (749.6)   
Acquisition earn-out payments  (34.2)  (174.3)  (56.0)  (26.3)  (34.2)  (174.3)
Disposal of businesses   1.6 
              
Net cash used in investing activities  (102.4)  (98.4)  (48.2)  (337.8)  (102.4)  (98.4)
              
  
Financing activities:
  
Issuance of new shares 441.8     441.8  
Proceeds from exercises of share options 80.0 79.8 137.4  19.6 80.0 79.8 
Purchases of treasury shares   (313.4)  (716.0)  (192.2)   (313.4)
Dividends paid  (168.9)  (207.1)  (155.0)  (197.9)  (168.9)  (207.1)
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation 9.4 16.8 23.1  14.8 9.4 16.8 
Capital invested into consolidated investment products 7.2 96.1 211.0  24.3 7.2 96.1 
Capital distributed by consolidated investment products  (52.1)  (241.0)  (318.2)  (97.2)  (52.1)  (241.0)
Borrowings of consolidated investment products  28.9 112.6    28.9 
Repayments of consolidated investment products   (9.3)  (33.1)
Net repayments under credit facility  (12.0)  (114.4)  (2.6)
Issuance of senior notes   300.0 
Repayments of debt of consolidated investment products  (207.3)   (9.3)
Net borrowings/(repayments) under credit facility 570.0  (12.0)  (114.4)
Repayments of senior notes  (397.2)  (2.8)  (300.0)   (397.2)  (2.8)
Acquisition of remaining noncontrolling interest in subsidiary  (8.9)      (8.9)  
              
Net cash used in financing activities  (100.7)  (666.4)  (740.8)  (65.9)  (100.7)  (666.4)
              
  
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 159.6  (239.3) 126.5   (24.5) 159.6  (239.3)
Foreign exchange movement on cash and cash equivalents 17.2  (91.3) 10.4  3.0 17.2  (91.3)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 585.2 915.8 778.9  762.0 585.2 915.8 
              
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year 762.0 585.2 915.8  740.5 762.0 585.2 
              
  
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:  
Interest paid  (60.4)  (71.2)  (72.0)  (50.6)  (60.4)  (71.2)
Interest received 10.5 36.9 48.2  7.7 10.5 36.9 
Taxes paid  (88.4)  (238.4)  (328.2)  (172.3)  (88.4)  (238.4)
See accompanying notes.

6685


Invesco Ltd.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
                                    
 Equity Attributable to Common Shareholders 
 Retained         
                             Earnings         
 Equity Attributable to Common Shareholders Non-   Appropriated for         
 Accumulated controlling   Investors in Accumulated Total Equity Noncontrolling   
 Additional Other interests in   Additional Consolidated Other Attributable to Interests in   
 Common Ordinary Exchangeable Paid-in- Treasury Retained Comprehensive consolidated Total Common Paid-in- Treasury Retained Investment Comprehensive Common Consolidated Total 
$ in millions Shares Shares Shares Capital Shares Earnings (Loss)/Income entities Equity Shares Capital Shares Earnings Products Income Shareholders Entities Equity 
January 1, 2007  83.2 377.4 4,966.1  (577.9) 700.7 614.5 1,504.6 7,668.6 
January 1, 2010 91.9 5,688.4  (892.4) 1,631.4  393.6 6,912.9 707.9 7,620.8 
Adoption of guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 810    5.2 274.3  (5.2) 274.3  274.3 
                   
January 1, 2010, as adjusted 91.9 5,688.4  (892.4) 1,636.6 274.3 388.4 7,187.2 707.9 7,895.1 
Net income, including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests      673.6  212.9 886.5     465.7   465.7 171.1 636.8 
Other comprehensive income 
Other comprehensive income: 
Currency translation differences on investments in overseas subsidiaries       351.1  351.1       82.6 82.6  (5.3) 77.3 
Change in accumulated OCI related to employee benefit plans       7.7  7.7       18.7 18.7  18.7 
Change in accumulated OCI of equity method investments      2.9 2.9  2.9 
Change in net unrealized gains on available-for-sale investments        (16.8)   (16.8)      9.9 9.9  9.9 
Tax impacts of changes in accumulated OCI balances        (4.4)   (4.4)
Tax impacts of changes in accumulated other comprehensive income balances       (7.0)  (7.0)   (7.0)
          
Total comprehensive income 1,224.1  572.8 165.8 738.6 
          
Net income reclassified to appropriated retained earnings     77.1  77.1  (77.1)  
Currency translation differences on investments in overseas subsidiaries reclassified to appropriated retained earnings      (5.3)   (5.3) 5.3  
Change in noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities, net         (596.3)  (596.3)         (69.2)  (69.2)
Adoption of FIN 48       (17.6)    (17.6)
Dividends       (155.0)    (155.0)
Employee share plans: 
Share-based compensation    105.2     105.2 
Vested shares     (53.9) 53.9     
Exercise of options  1.6  135.8     137.4 
Tax impact of share-based payment    23.1     23.1 
Purchase of shares      (683.7)     (683.7)
Cancellation of treasury shares   (1.9)   (251.4) 253.3     
Business combinations    6.0    6.0 
Conversion of exchangeable shares into ordinary shares  2.0  (377.4) 375.4      
Cancellation of ordinary shares and issuance of common shares 84.9  (84.9)        
                   
December 31, 2007 84.9   5,306.3  (954.4) 1,201.7 952.1 1,121.2 7,711.8 
                   
Net income, including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests      481.7   (60.7) 421.0 
Other comprehensive income 
Currency translation differences on investments in overseas subsidiaries        (1,034.2)   (1,034.2)
Change in accumulated OCI related to employee benefit plans        (0.3)   (0.3)
Change in net unrealized losses on available-for-sale investments        (9.3)   (9.3)
Tax impacts of changes in accumulated OCI balances        (4.1)   (4.1)
   
Total comprehensive income  (626.9)
   
Change in noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities, net         (153.8)  (153.8)
Business Combinations 6.2 563.0   149.4  718.6 363.6 1,082.2 
Dividends       (207.1)    (207.1)     (197.9)    (197.9)   (197.9)
Employee share plans:           
Share-based compensation    97.7     97.7   117.8     117.8  117.8 
Vested shares     (55.7) 55.7        (94.5) 94.5       
Exercise of options 0.4    (12.5) 87.8    75.7    (26.9) 46.5    19.6  19.6 
Tax impact of share-based payment    16.8     16.8   14.8     14.8  14.8 
Purchase of shares     (318.0)     (318.0)    (240.1)     (240.1)   (240.1)
                                      
December 31, 2008
 85.3   5,352.6  (1,128.9) 1,476.3  (95.8) 906.7 6,596.2 
December 31, 2010
 98.1 6,262.6  (991.5) 1,904.4 495.5 495.5 8,264.6 1,096.3 9,360.9 
                                      
Net income, including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests      322.5   (113.2) 209.3 
Other comprehensive income 
Currency translation differences on investments in overseas subsidiaries       488.3  488.3 
Change in accumulated OCI related to employee benefit plans        (15.1)   (15.1)
Change in net unrealized gains on available-for-sale investments       14.6  14.6 
Adoption of ASC Topic 320-10-65        (1.5)   (1.5)
Tax impacts of changes in accumulated other comprehensive income balances       3.1  3.1 
   
Total comprehensive income 698.7 
   
Adoption of ASC Topic 320-10-65      1.5  1.5 
Change in noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities, net         (84.2)  (84.2)
Issuance of new shares 6.6   435.2     441.8 
Dividends       (168.9)    (168.9)
Employee share plans: 
Share-based compensation    90.8     90.8 
Vested shares     (127.6) 127.6     
Exercise of options     (51.5) 131.8    80.3 
Tax impact of share-based payment    9.4     9.4 
Modification of share-based payment awards     (13.0)      (13.0)
Purchase of shares     (22.9)     (22.9)
Acquisition of remaining noncontrolling interest in subsidiary     (7.5)     (1.4)  (8.9)
                   
December 31, 2009
 91.9   5,688.4  (892.4) 1,631.4 393.6 707.9 7,620.8 
                   
See accompanying notes.

6786


Invesco Ltd.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity (continued)
                                 
  Equity Attributable to Common Shareholders 
                  Accumulated  Total Equity  Non-controlling    
      Additional          Other  Attributable to  Interests in    
  Common  Paid-in-  Treasury  Retained  Comprehensive  Common  Consolidated  Total 
$ in millions Shares  Capital  Shares  Earnings  Income/(Loss)  Shareholders  Entities  Equity 
January 1, 2009  85.3   5,352.6   (1,128.9)  1,476.3   (95.8)  5,689.5   906.7   6,596.2 
Net income/(loss), including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests           322.5      322.5   (113.2)  209.3 
Other comprehensive income:                                
Currency translation differences on investments in overseas subsidiaries              488.3   488.3      488.3 
Change in accumulated OCI related to employee benefit plans              (15.1)  (15.1)     (15.1)
Change in net unrealized gains on available-for-sale investments              14.6   14.6      14.6 
Adoption of guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 320              (1.5)  (1.5)     (1.5)
Tax impacts of changes in accumulated other comprehensive income balances              3.1   3.1      3.1 
                              
Total comprehensive income                 811.9   (113.2)  698.7 
                              
Adoption of guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 320           1.5      1.5      1.5 
Change in noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities, net                    (84.2)  (84.2)
Issuance of new shares  6.6   435.2            441.8      441.8 
Dividends           (168.9)     (168.9)     (168.9)
Employee share plans:                                
Share-based compensation     90.8             90.8      90.8 
Vested shares     (127.6)  127.6                
Exercise of options     (51.5)  131.8         80.3      80.3 
Tax impact of share-based payment     9.4            9.4      9.4 
Modification of share-based payment awards     (13.0)           (13.0)     (13.0)
Purchase of shares        (22.9)        (22.9)     (22.9)
Acquisition of remaining noncontrolling interest in subsidiary     (7.5)           (7.5)  (1.4)  (8.9)
                         
December 31, 2009
  91.9   5,688.4   (892.4)  1,631.4   393.6   6,912.9   707.9   7,620.8 
                         
                                 
  Equity Attributable to Common Shareholders 
                          Non-    
                  Accumulated  Total Equity  controlling    
      Additional          Other  Attributable to  Interests in    
  Common  Paid-in-  Treasury  Retained  Comprehensive  Common  Consolidated  Total 
$ in millions Shares  Capital  Shares  Earnings  Income/(Loss)  Shareholders  Entities  Equity 
January 1, 2008  84.9   5,306.3   (954.4)  1,201.7   952.1   6,590.6   1,121.2   7,711.8 
Net income, including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests           481.7      481.7   (60.7)  421.0 
Other comprehensive income                                
Currency translation differences on investments in overseas subsidiaries              (1,034.2)  (1,034.2)     (1,034.2)
Change in accumulated OCI related to employee benefit plans              (0.3)  (0.3)     (0.3)
Change in net unrealized losses on available-for-sale investments              (9.3)  (9.3)     (9.3)
Tax impacts of changes in accumulated OCI balances              (4.1)  (4.1)     (4.1)
                              
Total comprehensive income                      (566.2)  (60.7)  (626.9)
                              
Change in noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities, net                     (153.8)  (153.8)
Dividends           (207.1)     (207.1)     (207.1)
Employee share plans:                                
Share-based compensation     97.7            97.7      97.7 
Vested shares     (55.7)  55.7                
Exercise of options  0.4   (12.5)  87.8         75.7      75.7 
Tax impact of share-based payment     16.8            16.8      16.8 
Purchase of shares        (318.0)        (318.0)     (318.0)
                         
December 31, 2008
  85.3   5,352.6   (1,128.9)  1,476.3   (95.8)  5,689.5   906.7   6,596.2 
                         
See accompanying notes.

87


Invesco Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Corporate Information
     Invesco Ltd. (Parent) and all of its consolidated entities (collectively, the company or Invesco) provide retail, institutional and high-net-worth clients with an array of global investment management capabilities. The company operates globally and its sole business is assetinvestment management.
     On December 4, 2007, the predecessor to Invesco Ltd., INVESCO PLC, became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Invesco Ltd. and the shareholders of INVESCO PLC received common shares of Invesco Ltd. in exchange for their ordinary shares of INVESCO PLC. This transaction was accounted for in a manner similar to a pooling of interests. Additionally, the company’s primary share listing moved from the London Stock Exchange to the New York Stock Exchange, a share capital consolidation was immediately implemented (a reverse stock split) on a one-for-two basis, and the company’s regulated business in the European Union was transferred from INVESCO PLC to Invesco Ltd. All prior period share and earnings per share amounts have been adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split.
Basis of Accounting and Consolidation
     In the opinion of management, the Consolidated Financial Statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, which are necessary for the fair presentation of the financial condition and results of operations for the interim periods presented. All significant intercompany transactions, balances, revenues and expenses are eliminated upon consolidation.
     The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and consolidate the financial statements of the Parent, all of its controlled subsidiaries, any variable interest entities (VIEs) required to be consolidated, and any non-VIE general partnership investments where the company is deemed to have control. Control is deemed to be present when the Parent holds a majority voting interest or otherwise has the power to govern the financial and operating policies of the subsidiary so as to obtain the benefits from its activities. The company provides investment management services to, and has transactions with, various private equity funds, real estate funds, fund-of-funds, collateralized loan obligations (CLOs), and other investment products sponsored by the company for the investment of client assets in the normal course of business. The company serves as the investment manager, making day-to-day investment decisions concerning the assets of these products. Certain of these entities are considered to be VIEs.
     The company follows the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 810, “Consolidation,” when accounting for VIEs, including Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-10, “Amendments for Certain Investment Funds” (ASU 2010-10), detailed in “Accounting Pronouncements Recently Adopted and Pending Accounting Pronouncements” below. VIEs, or entities in which the risks and rewards of ownership are not directly linked to voting interests, for which the company is the primary beneficiary (havingare consolidated. For all investment products with the exception of CLOs, if the company is deemed to have a variable interest in, and to have the majority of rewards/risks of ownership) are consolidated. Certainownership associated with, these entities, then the company is deemed to be their primary beneficiary and is required to consolidate these entities. For CLOs, if the company is deemed to have the power to direct the activities of the CLO that most significantly impact the CLO’s economic performance, and the obligation to absorb losses/right to receive benefits from the CLO that could potentially be significant to the CLO, then the company is deemed to be the CLO’s primary beneficiary and is required to consolidate the CLO. Investment products that are consolidated are referred to as “Consolidated Investment Products” in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.
     All of the investments held and notes issued by consolidated investment products are presented at fair value in the company’s managedConsolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2010, and interest income and expense of consolidated CLOs are presented as other income/(expense) in the company’s Consolidated Income Statement for the year ended December 31, 2010. The surplus of consolidated CLO assets over consolidated CLO liabilities is reflected in the company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet as retained earnings appropriated for investors in consolidated investment products. Current period gains/(losses) attributable to investors in consolidated CLOs are included in (gains)/losses attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities in the Consolidated Statement of Income and in the retained earnings appropriated for investors in consolidated investment products in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, as they are considered noncontrolling interests of the company. See Note 20, “Consolidated Investment Products,” for additional details.
     The company also consolidates certain private equity and real estate funds that are structured as partnerships in which the company is the general partner receiving a management and/or performance fee. If the company is deemed to have a variable interest in these entities and is determined to be the primary beneficiary, these entities are consolidated into the company’s financial statements. If the company is not determined to be the primary beneficiary, the equity method of accounting is used to account for the company’s investment in these entities. Non-VIE general partnership investments are deemed to be controlled by the company and would be consolidated under a voting interest entity (VOE) model, unless the limited partners have the substantive ability to remove the general partner without cause based upon a simple majority vote or can otherwise dissolve the partnership, or unless the limited partners have substantive participating rights over decision-making. Investment products that are consolidated are referred to as consolidated investment products in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
     A significant portion of consolidated investment products are private equity funds. Private equity investments made by the underlying funds consist of direct investments in, or fund investments in other private equity funds that hold direct investments in, equity or debt securities in operating companies that are generally not initially publicly traded. Private equity funds are considered investment companies and are therefore accounted for under the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)ASC Topic 946, “Financial Services — Investment Companies.” All of the investments of consolidated investment products are presented at fair value in the financial statements. The company has retained the specialized industry accounting principles of these investment products in ourits Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note 16,20, “Consolidated Investment Products,” for additional details.

88


     Non-VIE general partnership investments are deemed to be controlled by the company and are consolidated under a voting interest entity (VOE) model, unless the limited partners have the substantive ability to remove the general partner without cause based upon a simple majority vote or can otherwise dissolve the partnership, or unless the limited partners have substantive participating rights over decision-making.
     If the company determines that it does not control the private equity and real estate partnership funds in which it has invested, the equity method of accounting is used to account for the company’s investment in these entities. The equity method of accounting is also used to account for investments in joint ventures and noncontrolled subsidiaries in which the company’s ownership is between 20 and 50 percent and for certain of the company’s investments in partnerships, as discussed above.percent. Equity investments are carried initially at cost (subsequently adjusted to recognize the company’s share of the profit or loss of the investee after the date of acquisition) and are included in investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The proportionate share of income or loss is included in equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates in the Consolidated Statements of Income. If the company determines that it does not control CLOs in which it has invested, the company accounts for its investments as available-for-sale investments.
     The financial statements have been prepared primarily on the historical cost basis; however, certain items are presented using other bases such as fair value, where such treatment is required.required or voluntarily elected. The financial statements of subsidiaries, with the exception of consolidated investment products as discussed above, are prepared for the same reporting year as the Parent and use consistent accounting policies, which, where applicable, have been adjusted to U.S. GAAP from local generally accepted accounting principles or reporting regulations. The financial information of the consolidated CLOs is included in the company’s consolidated financial statements on a one-month lag. Noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities and retained earnings appropriated for investors in consolidated investment products represent the interests in certain entities consolidated by the company either because the company has control over the entity or has determined that it is the primary beneficiary, but of which the company does not own all of the entity’s equity.

68

Use of Estimates


     In preparing the financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported revenues, expenses, assets, liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities. The primary estimates relate to investment valuation, goodwill impairment and taxes. Use of available information and application of judgment are inherent in the formation of estimates. Actual results in the future could differ from such estimates and the differences may be material to the financial statements.
Acquisition Accounting
     In accordance with ASC Topic 805, “Business Combinations” (ASC Topic 805), any excess of the cost of the acquisition over the fair values of the identifiable net assets acquired attributable to the company is recognized as goodwill. With certain exceptions, 100% of the fair values of assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and noncontrolling interests is recognized in acquisitions of less than 100% controlling interest when the acquisition constitutes a change in control of the acquired entity. Additionally, when partial ownership in an acquiree is obtained, the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interests are recognized and consolidated at 100% of their fair values at that date, regardless of the percentage ownership in the acquiree. As goodwill is calculated as a residual, all goodwill of the acquired business, not just the company’s share, is recognized under this “full-goodwill” approach. Noncontrolling interests are stated at the noncontrolling shareholder’s proportion of the pre-acquisition carrying values of the acquired net assets. The results of entities acquired or sold during the year are included from or to the date control changes.
     Contingent consideration obligations that are elements of consideration transferred are recognized as of the acquisition date as part of the fair value transferred in exchange for the acquired business. Acquisition-related costs incurred in connection with a business combination shall be expensed.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
     Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash at banks, in hand and short-term investments with a maturity upon acquisition of three months or less. Also included in cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2009,2010, is $1.7$2.4 million in cash to facilitate trust operations and customer transactions in the company’s affiliated funds. Cash and cash equivalents invested in affiliated money market funds (related parties) totaled $465.1$289.6 million at December 31, 2009.2010. Cash and cash equivalents of consolidated investment products are not available for general use by the company.

89


     Cash balances may not be readily accessibleassessable to the Parent due to certain capital adequacy requirements.requirements of certain of our subsidiaries. These and other similar provisions of applicable law may have the effect of limiting withdrawals of capital, repayment of intercompany loans and payment of dividends by such entities. A sub-group of Invesco has localsubsidiaries, including all of our regulated EU subsidiaries, is subject to consolidated capital requirements in several jurisdictions, as well as regional requirements for entities that are part of theunder applicable European sub-group.Union (EU) directives, and capital is maintained within this sub-group to satisfy these regulations. These requirements mandate the retention of liquid resources in those jurisdictions, which we meet in part by holding cash and cash equivalents. This retained cash can be used for general business purposes in the European sub-group or in the countries where it is located. Due to the capital restrictions, the ability to transfer cash between certain jurisdictions may be limited. In addition, transfers of cash between international jurisdictions may have adverse tax consequences that may substantially limit such activity. At December 31, 2009,2010, the European sub-group had cash and cash equivalent balances of $333.5$456.2 million, much of which is used to satisfy these regulatory requirements. The company is in compliance with all regulatory minimum net capital requirements.
     In addition, the company is required to hold cash deposits with clearing organizations or to otherwise segregate cash to maintain compliance with federal and other regulations in connection with its unit investment trust (UIT) broker dealer entity, which was included in the acquired business. At December 31, 2010 these cash deposits totaled $14.9 million.
Unsettled Fund Receivables and Payables
     The company records unsettled fund receivables from underlying fund investors in certain fund products outside the U.S. when these investors place unsettled investments into the funds. Additionally, the company records unsettled fund receivables from certain non-U.S. funds during the settlement period when underlying fund investors redeem their holdings. Settlement periods for both receivables from underlying investors and funds is generally less than four days. Additionally, in its capacity as sponsor of UITs which arose subsequent to the acquisition of Morgan Stanley’s retail asset management business on June 1, 2010 (discussed in Note 2, “Business Combination and Integration,”) the company records receivables from brokers, dealers, and clearing organizations for unsettled sell trades of securities and UITs in addition to receivables from customers for unsettled buy trades of securities and UITs. The company also records payables to brokers, dealers, and clearing organization for unsettled buy trades of securities and UITs in addition to payables to customers for unsettled sell trades of securities and UITs. The presentation of the unsettled fund receivables and substantially offsetting payables at trade date reflects the legal relationship between the underlying investor and the company. Unsettled fund receivables and payables were $513.4 million and $504.8 million at December 31, 2010 (December 31, 2009: $383.1 million and $367.9 million).
Accounts Receivable and Payable
     Accounts receivable and payable are recorded at their original invoice amounts. Accounts receivable are also recorded less any allowance for uncollectible amounts. Accounts receivable include managementprimarily represents fees receivable from affiliated funds.
Investments
     Investments in equity securities that have readily determinable fair values and investments in debt securities are classified as either trading or available-for-sale. Investments in debt securities are classified as held-to-maturity investments if the company has the intent and ability to hold the investments until maturity. Trading securities are securities bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term. Available-for-sale securities are those neither classified as trading nor as held-to-maturity. Trading and available-for-sale investments are measured at fair value. Gains or losses arising from changes in the fair value of trading investments are included in income, and gains or losses arising from changes in the fair value of available-for-sale investments are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, until the investment is sold or otherwise disposed of, or until the investment is determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired, at which time the cumulative gain or loss previously reported in equity is included in income. The specific identification method is used to determine the realized gain or loss on securities sold or otherwise disposed. Held-to-maturity investments are measured at amortized cost, taking into account any discounts or premiums.

69


     Investments in joint ventures, non-controlled subsidiaries and certain investment products that are not consolidated under a VIE or VOE model are investments over which the company has significant influence but not control and are accounted for using the equity method, where the investment is initially recorded at cost and the carrying amount is increased or decreased to recognize the company’s share of the after-tax profit or loss of the investee after the date of acquisition. Investments in joint ventures are investments jointly controlled by the company and external parties. Investments in joint ventures are also accounted for using the equity method to reflect the substance and economic reality of the company’s interest in jointly controlled entities. Equity investments are included in investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The proportionate share of income or loss is included in equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

90


     Fair value is determined using a valuation hierarchy (discussed in Note 2)3, “Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities,”) generally by reference to an active trading market, using quoted closing or bid prices as of each reporting period end. When a readily ascertainable market value does not exist for an investment, (such as the company’s collateralized loan obligations, discussed below) the fair value is calculated based on the expected cash flows of its underlying net asset base, taking into account applicable discount rates and other factors. Judgment is used to ascertain if a formerly active market has become inactive and in determining fair values when markets have become inactive.
     The company evaluates the carrying value of investments for impairment on a quarterly basis. In its impairment analysis, the company takes into consideration numerous criteria, including the duration and extent of any decline in fair value, the intent and ability of the company to hold the security for a period of time sufficient for a recovery in value, recent events specific to the issuer or industry and external credit ratings and recent downgrades with respect to issuers of debt securities held. If the decline in value is determined to be other-than-temporary, the carrying value of the security is generally written down to fair value through the income statement. If the fair value of a debt security, however, is less than its amortized cost, the decline in value is determined to be other-than-temporary, and the company intends to sell the debt security or it is more likely than not that the company will be required to sell the debt security before the recovery of its amortized cost basis, the entire difference between the investment’s amortized cost basis and its fair value is recognized as an other-than-temporary impairment through the income statement. If the company does not intend to sell the debt security, and it is not more likely than not that the company will be required to sell the debt security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, then the other-than-temporary impairment is separated into two components: a) the amount representing the credit loss, which is recorded as a charge to the income statement, and b) the amount related to all other factors, which is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of tax.
     The company provides investment management services to a number of collateralized loan obligation entities (CLOs). These entities are investment vehicles created for the sole purpose of issuing collateralized loan instruments that offer investors the opportunity for returns that vary with the risk level of their investment. The notes issued by the CLOs are backed by diversified portfolios consisting primarily of loans or structured debt. For managing the collateral for the CLO entities, the company earns investment management fees, including in some cases subordinated management fees, as well as contingent incentive fees. The company has invested in certain of the entities, generally taking a relatively small portion of the unrated, junior subordinated position. At December 31, 2009, the company held $17.9 million of investment in these CLOs, which represents its maximum risk of loss. The company’s investments in CLOs are generally subordinated to other interests in the entities and entitles the investors to receive the residual cash flows, if any, from the entities. Investors in CLOs have no recourse against the company for any losses sustained in the CLO structure.
     Management has concluded that the company is not the primary beneficiary of any of the CLO entities and it has recorded its investments at fair value using an income approach. The excess of actual and anticipated future cash flows over the initial investment at the date of purchase is recognized as interest income over the life of the investment using the effective yield method in accordance with ASC Topic 320, “Investments — Debt and Equity Securities” (ASC Topic 320) and ASC Topic 325, “Investments — Other” (ASC Topic 325). The company reviews cash flow estimates throughout the life of each CLO entity. Cash flow estimates are based on the underlying pool of securities and take into account the overall credit quality of the issuers, the forecasted default rate of the securities and the company’s past experience in managing similar securities. If the updated estimate of future cash flows (taking into account both timing and amounts) is less than the last revised estimate, an impairment loss is recognized based on the excess of the carrying amount of the investment over its fair value and is recorded through the income statement. Fair value is determined using current information, notably market yields and projected cash flows based on forecasted default and recovery rates that a market participant would use in determining the current fair value of the equity interest. Dividend income for these investments is recorded in other income on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

70


Assets Held for Policyholders and Policyholder Payables
     One of the company’s subsidiaries, Invesco Perpetual Life Limited, is an insurance entity that was established to facilitate retirement savings plans.plans in the U.K. The entity holds assets that are managed for its clients on its balance sheet with an equal and offsetting liability to the policyholders, which is linked to the value of the investments. The investments are legally segregated and are generally not subject to claims that arise from any of the company’s other businesses. Investments and policyholder payables held by this business meet the definition of financial instruments and are carried in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as separate account assets and liabilities at fair value in accordance with ASC Topic 944, “Financial Services — Insurance.” At December 31, 2010, the assets held for policyholders and the linked policyholder payables were $1,295.4 million (2009: $1,283.0 million). Changes in fair value are recorded and offset to zero in the Consolidated Statements of Income in other operating revenues.
     The liability to the policyholders is linked to the value of the investments. The investments are legally segregated and are generally not subject to claims that arise from any of the company’s other businesses. Management fees earned from policyholder investments are accounted for as described in the company’s revenue recognition accounting policy.
Security Deposit Assets and Receivables and Security Deposits Payable
     As a result of Invesco’s acquisition of the Asia fund and asset management business of AIG Global Real Estate Investment Corp. (“AIG Asia Real Estate”), Invesco is an asset manager of property portfolios, whereby the company provides services such as leasing management, building management, building maintenance and administration activities. In order to carry out such activities, Invesco is a party to master lease agreements with the property owners and is a party to sublease agreements with the tenants of the properties. Under these agreements, Invesco collects the security deposits and rent and remits the amounts, with no mark-up, to the property owners. The security deposits remitted to the property owners and the security deposits payable to the tenants are presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2010, as security deposit assets and security deposits payable, respectively. Included in security deposit assets is $41.1 million receivable from affiliated funds, which earns interest at TIBOR plus 0.1%.
Deferred Sales Commissions
     Mutual fund shares sold without a sales commission at the time of purchase are commonly referred to as “B shares.” B shares typically have an asset-based fee (12b-1 fee) that is charged to the fund over a period of years and a contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC). The CDSC is an asset-based fee that is charged to investors that redeem B shares during a stated period. Commissions paid at the date of sale to brokers and dealers for sales of mutual funds that have a CDSC are capitalized and amortized over a period not to exceed the redemption period of the related fund (generally up to six years). The deferred sales commission asset is reviewed periodically for impairment by reviewing the recoverability of the asset based on estimated future fees to be collected.

91


Property, Equipment and Depreciation
     Property and equipment includes owned property, leasehold improvements, computer hardware/software and other equipment and is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation or amortization and any previously recorded impairment in value. Expenditures for major additions and improvements are capitalized; minor replacements, maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Amounts incurred are presented as work-in-progress until the construction or purchase of the property and equipment is substantially complete and ready for its intended use, which, at that point, will begin to be depreciated or amortized. Depreciation is provided on property and equipment at rates calculated to write off the cost, less estimated residual value, of each asset on a straight-line basis over its expected useful life: owned buildings over 50 years, leasehold improvements over the shorter of the lease term or useful life of the improvement; and computers and other various equipment between three and seven years. Purchased and internally developed software is capitalized where the related costs can be measured reliably, and it is probable that the asset will generate future economic benefits, and amortized into operating expenses on a straight-line basis over its useful life, usually five years. The company capitalizes qualified internal and external costs incurred during the application development stage for internally developed software in accordance with ASC Topic 350-40, “Intangibles — Goodwill and Other — Internal-Use Software.” The company reevaluates the useful life determination for property and equipment each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining useful life. On sale or retirement, the asset cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the financial statements and any related gain or loss is reflected in income.
     The carrying amounts of property and equipment are reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying values may not be recoverable. At each reporting date, an assessment is made for any indication of impairment. If an indication of impairment exists, recoverability is tested by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated from the asset. If those net undiscounted cash flows do not exceed the carrying amount (i.e. the asset is not recoverable), the next step would be performed, which is to determine the fair value of the asset and record an impairment charge, if any.
Intangible Assets
     Management contract intangibleIntangible assets identified on the acquisition of a business are capitalized separately from goodwill if the fair value can be measured reliably on initial recognition (transaction date) and, if they are determined to be finite-lived, are amortized and recorded as operating expenses on a straight-line basis over their useful lives, usually sevenfrom two to ten12 years, which reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits are realized. The company considers its own assumptions, which require management’s judgment, about renewal or extension of the term of the arrangement, consistent with its expected use of the asset. A change in the useful life of an intangible asset could have a significant impact on the company’s amortization expense.
Where evidence exists that the underlying management contracts are renewed annuallyhave a high likelihood of continued renewal at little or no cost to the company, the management contract intangible asset is assigned an indefinite life and reviewed for impairment on an annual basis. The company reevaluates the useful life determination for intangible assets each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining useful life or an indication of impairment. The indicators in ASC Topic 350-30 paragraphs 35-23 and 24 were considered in making the determination that the indefinite-lived intangibles that arose from the June 1, 2010, acquisition of Morgan Stanley’s retail asset management business comprise one unit of account for impairment testing purposes. None of the indicators were considered presumptive or determinative; however, due to the fact that the retail fund management contracts are managed under Invesco’s single retail branding strategy and are used by various business components within the organization, the single unit of account was deemed appropriate.
Definite-lived intangibles are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable (i.e. carrying amount exceeds the sum of the fair value of the intangible). Intangible assets not subject to amortization are tested for impairment annually as of October 1 or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The impairment test

71


consists of a comparison of the fair value of an intangible asset with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of the intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. Fair value is generally determined using an income approach where estimated future cash flows are discounted to arrive at a discounted cash flow analysis.single present value amount.
Goodwill
     Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the identifiable net assets of businesses acquired and is recorded in the functional currency of the acquired entity. Goodwill is recognized as an asset and is reviewed for impairment annually as of October 1 and

92


between annual tests when events and circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred. The impairment test for goodwill consists of a two-step approach, which is performed at the reporting unit level. The company has determined that it has one reporting unit for goodwill impairment testing purposes, the consolidated Invesco Ltd. single operating segment level, which is the level at which internal reporting is generated that reflects the way that the company manages its operations and to which goodwill is naturally associated. The company evaluated the components of its business, which are business units one level below the operating segment level, and has determined that it has one reporting unit for purposes of goodwill impairment testing. The company’s components include Invesco Institutional, Invesco North American Retail, Invesco Perpetual, Invesco Continental Europe and Invesco Asia Pacific. The company’s operating segment represents one reporting unit because all of the components are similar due to the common nature of products and services offered, type of clients, methods of distribution, manner in which each component is operated, extent to which they share assets and resources, and the extent to which they support and benefit from common product development efforts. Traditional profit and loss measures are not produced and therefore not reviewed by component management for any of the components. Furthermore, the financial information that is available by component is not sufficient for purposes of performing a discounted cash flow analysis at the component level in order to test goodwill for impairment at that level. As none of the company’s components are reporting units, the company has determined that its single operating segment, investment management, is also its single reporting unit.
     The impairment test for goodwill consists of a two-step approach, which is performed at the reporting unit level. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value (the first step of the goodwill impairment test), then the second step is performed to determine if goodwill is impaired and to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any. The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying amount of goodwill. If the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
     The principal method of determining fair value of the reporting unit is an income approach where estimated future cash flows are discounted to arrive at a single present value amount. The discount rate used is derived based on the time value of money and the risk profile of the stream of future cash flows. Recent results and projections based on expectations regarding revenue, expenses, capital expenditure and acquisition earn out payments produce a present value for the reporting unit. The present value produced for the reporting unit is the fair value of the reporting unit. This amount is reconciled to the company’s market capitalization to determine an implied control premium, which is compared to an analysis of historical control premiums experienced by peer companies over a long period of time to assess the reasonableness of the fair value of the reporting unit.
     The company also utilizes a market approach to provide a secondary and corroborative fair value of the reporting unit by using comparable company and transaction multiples to estimate values for our single reporting unit. Discretion and judgment is required in determining whether the transaction data available represents information for companies of comparable nature, scope and size. The results of the secondary market approach to provide a fair value estimate are not combined or weighted with the results of the income approach described above but are used to provide an additional basis to determine the reasonableness of the income approach fair value estimate.
Debt and Financing Costs
     Debt issuance costs are recognized as a deferred asset under ASC Topic 835, “Interest.” After initial recognition, debt issuance costs are measured at amortized cost. Finance charges and debt issuance costs are amortized over the term of the debt using the effective interest method. Interest charges are recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income in the period in which they are incurred.
Treasury Shares
     Treasury shares are valued at cost and are included as deductions from equity.equity on the settlement date.
Revenue Recognition
     Revenue is measured at the fair value of consideration received or receivable and represents amounts receivable for services provided in the normal course of business, net of discounts, value added tax and other sales-related taxes. Revenue is recognized when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, delivery has occurred or services have been provided, collectibility is reasonably assured and the revenue can be reliably measured. Revenue represents management, service and distribution, performance and other fees. Revenue is generally accrued over the period for which the service is provided.

93


     Investment management fees are derived from providing professional services to manage client accounts and include fees earned from retail mutual funds, unit trusts, investment companies with variable capital (ICVCs), exchange-traded funds, investment trusts and institutional and private wealth management advisory contracts. Investment management fees for products offered in the retail distribution channel are generally calculated as a percentage of the daily average asset balances and therefore vary as the levels of AUM change resulting from inflows, outflows and market movements. Investment management fees for products offered in the

72


institutional and private wealth management distribution channels are calculated in accordance with the underlying investment management contracts and also vary in relation to the level of client assets managed. For the year ended December 31, 2009,2010, management fees from affiliated fund products were $2,083.8 million (2009: $1,571.1 million (2008:million; 2008: $1,979.6 million; 2007: $2,481.6 million).
     Service fees are generated through fees charged to cover several types of expenses, including fund accounting fees and other maintenance costs for mutual funds, unit trusts and ICVCs, and administrative fees earned from closed-ended funds. Service fees also include transfer agent fees, which are fees charged to cover the expense of processing client share purchases and redemptions, call center support and client reporting. U.S. distribution fees can include 12b-1 fees earned from certain mutual funds to cover allowable sales and marketing expenses for those funds and also include asset-based sales charges paid by certain mutual funds for a period of time after the sale of those funds. Distribution fees typically vary in relation to the amount of client assets managed. Generally, retail products offered outside of the U.S. do not generate a separate distribution fee, as the quoted management fee rate is inclusive of these services.
     Performance fee revenues are generated on certain management contracts when performance hurdles are achieved. Such fee revenues are recorded in operating revenues as of the performance measurement date, when the contractual performance criteria have been met and when the outcome of the transaction can be measured reliably in accordance with Method 1 of ASC Topic 605-20-S99, “Revenue Recognition — Services — SEC Materials.” Cash receipt of earned performance fees occurs after the measurement date. The performance measurement date is defined in each contract in which incentive and performance fee revenue agreements are in effect, and therefore we have performance fee arrangements that include monthly, quarterly and annual measurement dates. Given the uniqueness of each transaction, performance fee contracts are evaluated on an individual basis to determine if revenues can and should be recognized. Performance fees are not recorded if there are any future performance contingencies. If performance arrangements require repayment of the performance fee for failure to perform during the contractual period, then performance fee revenues are recognized no earlier than the expiration date of these terms. Performance fees will fluctuate from period to period and may not correlate with general market changes, since most of the fees are driven by relative performance to the respective benchmark rather than by absolute performance.
     Other revenues include fees derived primarily from transaction commissions earned upon the sale of new investments into certain of our funds and fees earned upon the completion of transactions in our real estate and private equity asset groups. Real estate transaction fees are derived from commissions earned through the buying and selling of properties. Private equity transaction fees include commissions associated with the restructuring of, and fees from providing advice to, portfolio companies held by the funds. These transaction fees are recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements on the date when the transactions are legally closed. The company is the sponsor of UITs. In its capacity as sponsor of UITs, the company earns other revenues related to transactional sales charges resulting from the sale of UIT products and from the difference between the purchase or bid and offer price of securities temporarily held to form new UIT products. These revenues are recorded as other revenues net of concessions to dealers who distribute UITs to investors. Other revenues also include the revenues of consolidated investment products.
     Distribution, service and advisory fees that are passed through to external parties are presented separately as expenses in accordance with ASC Topic 605-45, “Revenue Recognition — Principal Agent Considerations.” Third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses include periodic “renewal” commissions paid to brokers and independent financial advisors for their continuing oversight of their clients’ assets, over the time they are invested, and are payments for the servicing of client accounts. Renewal commissions are calculated based upon a percentage of the AUM value. Third-party distribution expenses also include the amortization of upfront commissions paid to broker-dealers for sales of fund shares with a contingent deferred sales charge (a charge levied to the investor for client redemption of AUM within a certain contracted period of time). The distribution commissions are amortized over the redemption period. Also included in third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses are sub-transfer agency fees that are paid to third parties for processing client share purchases and redemptions, call center support and client reporting. Third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses may increase or decrease at a rate different from the rate of change in service and distribution fee revenues due to the inclusion of distribution, service and advisory expenses for the U.K. and Canada, where the related revenues are recorded as investment management fee revenues, as noted above.
     Interest income is accrued on interest-bearing assets.
     Dividend income from investments is recognized on the ex-dividend date.

94


Share-Based Compensation
     The company issues equity-settled share-based awards to certain employees, which are measured at fair value at the date of grant. The fair value determined at the grant date is expensed, based on the company’s estimate of shares that will eventually vest, on a straight-line or accelerated basis over the vesting period. Fair value is measured by use of the stochastic (a lattice model) or Black

73


Scholes valuation models. The expected life of share-based compensation awards used in the lattice model is adjusted, based on management’s best estimate, for the effects of non-transferability, exercise restrictions and behavioral considerations.
Pensions
     For defined contribution plans, contributions payable related to the accounting period are charged to the income statement. For defined benefit plans, the cost of providing benefits is separately determined for each plan using the projected unit credit method, based on actuarial valuations performed at each balance sheet date. The company’s annual measurement date is December 31. A portion of actuarial gains and losses is recognized through the income statement if the net cumulative unrecognized actuarial gain or loss at the end of the prior period exceeds the greater of 10.0% of the present value of the defined benefit obligation (before deducting plan assets) at that date and 10.0% of the fair value of any plan assets. Prior service costs are recognized over the remaining service periods of active employees.
Advertising Costs
     The company expenses the cost of all advertising and promotional activities as incurred. The company incurred advertising costs of $21.0$17.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 (2008:2010 (2009: $21.0 million; 2008: $30.5 million; 2007: $28.6 million). These amounts are included in marketing expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Leases
     Rentals under operating leases, where the lessor retains substantially all the risks and benefits of ownership of the asset, are charged evenly to expense over the lease term. Benefits received and receivable as an incentive to enter an operating lease are also spread evenly over the lease term. The company accounts for lease termination costs in accordance with ASC Topic 420, “Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations,” which requires that (1) a liability for costs to terminate a contract before the end of its term shall be recognized at the time termination occurs and measured at fair value and (2) a liability for costs that will continue to be incurred under a contract for its remaining term without economic benefit to the company be recognized and measured at its fair value when the company ceases to use the right conveyed by the contract, net of estimated sublease rentals that could reasonably be obtained even if the company does not anticipate entering into any subleasing arrangements.
Taxation
     Income taxes are provided for in accordance with ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes” (ASC Topic 740). Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and the reported amounts in the Consolidated Financial Statements, using the statutory tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the results of operations in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized.
The company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,” which is now encompassed in ASC Topic 740, on January 1, 2007. Accordingly, the company reports a liability for unrecognized tax benefits resulting from uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The company recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.
Earnings Per Share
     Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income available to shareholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the periods, excluding treasury shares. Diluted earnings per share is computed using the treasury stock method, which requires computing share equivalents and dividing net income attributable to common shareholders by the total weighted average number of shares and share equivalents outstanding during the period.

95


Comprehensive Income
     The company’s other comprehensive income/(loss) consists of changes in unrealized gains and losses on investment securities classified as available-for-sale, the company’s share of other comprehensive income of equity method investments, reclassification adjustments for realized gains/(losses) on those investment securities classified as

74


available-for-sale, foreign currency translation adjustments and employee benefit plan liability adjustments. Such amounts are recorded net of applicable taxes.
Dividends to Shareholders
     Dividends to shareholders are recognized on the declaration date. Dividends are declared and paid on a quarterly basis.
Translation of Foreign Currencies
     Transactions in foreign currencies (currencies other than the functional currencies of the company’s subsidiaries) are recorded at the rates of exchange prevailing on the dates of the transactions. At each balance sheet date, monetary assets and liabilities that are denominated in foreign currencies are remeasured into the functional currencies of the company’s subsidiaries at the rates prevailing at the balance sheet date. Gains and losses arising on revaluation are included in the income statement.
     The company’s reporting currency and the functional currency of the Parent is U.S. dollars. On consolidation, the assets and liabilities of company subsidiary operations whose functional currencies are currencies other than the U.S. dollar (“foreign” operations) are translated at the rates of exchange prevailing at the balance sheet date. Income statement figures are translated at the weighted average rates for the year, which approximate actual exchange rates. Exchange differences arising on the translation of the net assets of foreign operations are taken directly to accumulated other comprehensive income in equity until the disposal of the net investment, at which time they are recognized in the income statement. Goodwill and other fair value adjustments arising on acquisition of a foreign entity are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign entity and are translated at rates of exchange prevailing at the balance sheet date.
     The company does not utilize derivative financial instruments to provide a hedge against interest rate or foreign exchange exposures.exposures except in the management of its offshore fund operations, where foreign currency forward and swap contracts are purchased daily to hedge against foreign exchange rate movements during the four-day client money settlement period. Certain consolidated investment products may also utilize such instruments. See Note 20, “Consolidated Investment Products,” for additional information.
Reclassifications
     The presentation of certain prior period reported amounts has been reclassified to be consistent with the current presentation. Such reclassifications had no impact on net income or equity attributable to common shareholders.
Accounting Pronouncements Recently Adopted and Pending Accounting Pronouncements
     In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (FASB Statement No. 157), which became effective for Invesco on January 1, 2008. FASB Statement No. 157, which is now encompassed in ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (ASC Topic 820), clarified how companies should measure fair value when they are required by U.S. GAAP to use a fair value measure for recognition or disclosure. FASB Statement No. 157 established a common definition of fair value, established a framework for measuring fair value under U.S. GAAP, and expanded disclosures about fair value measurements to eliminate differences in current practice in measuring fair value under existing accounting standards. The adoption of FASB Statement No. 157 did not result in any retrospective adjustments to prior period information or in a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings. See Note 2, “Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities,” for additional disclosures.
     In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations (FASB Statement No. 141(R)),” and Statement No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendmenttwo items of ARB No. 51 (FASB Statement No. 160).” Under FASB Statement No. 141(R), which isadditional guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 805, “Business Combinations,” and ASC Topic 810, “Consolidation.” Under the guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 805, the acquirer must recognize, with certain exceptions, 100% of the fair values of assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and noncontrolling interests in acquisitions of less than 100% controlling interest when the acquisition constitutes a change in control of the acquired entity. Additionally, when an acquirer obtains partial ownership in an acquiree, an acquirer recognizes and consolidates assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interests at 100% of their fair values at that date regardless of the percentage ownership in the acquiree. As goodwill is calculated as a residual, all goodwill of the acquired business, not just the acquirer’s share, is recognized under this “full-goodwill” approach. Contingent consideration obligations that are elements of consideration transferred are recognized as of the acquisition date as part of the fair value transferred in exchange for the acquired business. Acquisition-related costs incurred in connection with a business combination shall be expensed. FASB Statement No. 160, which isUnder the guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 810, “Consolidation,” establishesthe FASB established new accounting and reporting standards for noncontrolling interests (formerly known as “minority interests”) in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. FASB Statement No. 141(R) and FASB Statement No. 160Both items of additional guidance became effective for the company on January 1, 2009. FASB Statement

75


No. 141(R)The guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 805 was applied prospectively, while FASB Statement No. 160the guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 810 required retroactive adoption of the presentation and disclosure requirements for existing noncontrolling interests but prospective adoption of all of its other requirements. The adoption of FASB Statement No. 141(R)the additional guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 805 amended the definition of a business, which led to a change in the company’s basis, but not the company’s conclusion, of determining that it has one reporting unit for goodwill impairment purposes. The company acquired Morgan

96


Stanley’s retail asset management business, including Van Kampen Investments on June 1, 2010. See Item 7, “Management’s DiscussionNote 2, “Business Combination and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates — Goodwill”Integration” for additional information.
     In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (FASB Statement No. 159), which became effective for Invesco on January 1, 2008, at its own discretion. FASB Statement No. 159, which is now encompassed under ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments” (ASC Topic 825), permits companies to elect, on an instrument-by-instrument basis, to fair value certain financial assets and financial liabilities with changes in fair value recognized in earnings as they occur (the fair value option). The company chose not to elect the FASB Statement No. 159 fair value option for eligible items existing on its balance sheet as of January 1, 2008, or for any new eligible items recognized subsequent to January 1, 2008.details.
     In February 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 (FSP FAS 157-2).” FSP FAS 157-2, which isadditional guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 820, amended FASB Statement No. 157 to delay“Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (ASC Topic 820). The guidance delayed the effective date of ASC Topic 820 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (that is, at least annually). For items within its scope, FSP FAS 157-2the guidance delayed the effective date of FASB Statement No. 157ASC Topic 820 to January 1, 2009. As of January 1, 2008, Invescothe company applied the fair value measurement and disclosure provisions of FASB Statement No. 157ASC Topic 820 to its financial assets and financial liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements. As of January 1, 2009, Invescothe company applied the fair value measurement and disclosure provisions of FASB Statement No. 157ASC Topic 820 to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a non-recurring basis. Those items include: (1) nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities initially measured at fair value in a business combination or other new basis event, but not measured at fair value in subsequent periods; (2) nonfinancial long-lived assets measured at fair value for an impairment assessment under FASB Statement No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets;” (now encompassed in ASC Topic 360, “Property, Plant and Equipment”);Equipment;” (3) nonfinancial liabilities for exit or disposal activities initially measured at fair value under FASB Statement No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities;” (now encompassed in ASC Topic 420, “Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations”)Obligations;” and (4) nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities measured at fair value in the second step of a goodwill impairment test. The adoption of FSP FAS 157-2this additional guidance did not have a material impact on the company’s financial statements.
     In April 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. FAS 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (FSP FAS 142-3). FSP FAS 142-3,additional guidance, which is now encompassed in ASC Topic 350, “Intangibles — Goodwill and Other” (ASC Topic 350),. The guidance amended the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life over which to amortize the cost of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” also now encompassed in ASC Topic 350. FSP FAS 142-3350 and required an entity to consider its own assumptions about renewal or extension of the term of the arrangement, consistent with its expected use of the asset. FSP FAS 142-3It was intended to improve the consistency between the useful life of an intangible asset determined under FASB Statement No. 142ASC Topic 350 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under FASB Statement No. 141(R) (now encompassed in ASC Topic 805)805 and other U.S. GAAP. The guidance provided by FSP FAS 142-3 for determining the useful life of a recognized intangible asset was to be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date which isof January 1, 2009. FSP FAS 142-3This additional guidance did not have a material impact on the company’s financial statements.
     During June 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities” (FSP EITF 03-6-1). FSP EITF 03-6-1, which isadditional guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 260, “Earnings Per Share” (ASC Topic 260), addressedwhich addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share (EPS) under the two-class method described in FASB Statement No. 128, “Earnings Per Share,” also now encompassed in ASC Topic 260. The new guidance in the FSP EITF 03-6-1 providedprovides that only those unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities that should be included in the calculation of basic EPS under the two-class method. The FASB concluded that the holder of a share-based award receives a noncontingent transfer of value each time the entity declares a dividend, and therefore the share-based award meets the definition of a participating security. FSP EITF 03-6-1The guidance was effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, with all prior period EPS data being adjusted retrospectively. The adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1the guidance on January 1, 2009, required the company to include unvested restricted stock units (RSUs) that contain nonforfeitable dividend equivalents as outstanding common shares for purposes of calculating basic

76


EPS. The adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1this additional guidance did not have a material impact on the company’s calculation of diluted EPS for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. The weighted average number of shares used for the calculation ofperiods prior period earnings per share have been restated to reflect the adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1. The adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1 resulted in a change to the year-ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, reported basic earnings per share amounts of $0.01.
     In October 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. FAS 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active” (FSP FAS 157-3), which became effective for Invesco for the period ended September 30, 2008. FSP 157-3, which is now encompassed in ASC Topic 820, clarified the application of FASB Statement No. 157 (also now encompassed in ASC Topic 820) to financial assets in an inactive market. The FSP included an illustration of the application of judgment when selecting an appropriate discount rate to apply in the valuation of a collateralized debt obligation in a market that has become increasingly inactive. The adoption of FSP 157-3 did not have a material impact on the company’s financial statements.January 1, 2009.
     In December 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 140-4additional guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 860, “Transfers and FIN 46(R)-8, “Disclosures about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities (FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8),Servicing,” which became effective for the company on March 31, 2009. FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8, which is now encompassed in ASC Topic 860, “Transfers and Servicing,” requiredThe guidance requires additional disclosures by public entities with a) continuing involvement in transfers of financial assets to a special purpose entity or b) a variable interest in a variable interest entity. The adoption of FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8this additional guidance did not have a material impact on the company’s financial statements. See Note 16,20, “Consolidated Investment Products,” for additional disclosures.
     In December 2008,January 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 132(R)-1, “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets” (FSP FAS 132(R)-1), which isadditional guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 715, “Compensation — Retirement Benefits.” FSP FAS 132(R)-1 amends FASB Statement No. 132 (Revised 2003), “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets (FASB Statement No. 132(R))” that are intended to enhance the transparency surrounding the types of assets and associated risks in an employer’s defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. FSP FAS 132(R)-1 expands the disclosures set forth by FASB Statement No. 132(R) by adding required disclosures about: (1) how investment allocation decisions are made by management; (2) major categories of plan assets; and (3) significant concentrations of risk. Additionally, FSP FAS 132(R)-1 requires the employer to disclose information about the valuation of plans assets similar to that required under FASB Statement No. 157. Those disclosures include: (1) the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements of plan assets fall; (2) information about the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets; and (3) a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of plan assets valued using significant unobservable inputs. The new disclosures are required to be included in the financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009, and are included in Note 19, “Retirement Benefit Plans.”
     In January 2009, the FASB issued Staff Position No. EITF 99-20-1, “Amendments to the Impairment Guidance of EITF Issue No. 99-20 (FSP EITF 99-20-1),”325, which became effective for the company on March 31, 2009. FSP EITF 99-20-1, which is now encompassed inThe guidance revised the impairment approach provided by ASC Topic 325 revised the impairment guidance provided by EITF 99-20 for beneficial interests to make it consistent with the requirements of FASB Statement No. 115 (now encompassed in ASC Topic 320)320 for determining whether an impairment of other debt and equity securities is other-than-temporary. FSP EITF 99-20-1 eliminatedThis guidance also eliminates the requirement to rely exclusively on market participant assumptions about future cash flows and permitted the use of reasonable management judgment of the probability that the holder will be unable to collect all amounts due. Instead, FSP 99-20-1 requiredthis guidance requires that an other-than-temporary impairment be recognized when it is probable that there has been an adverse change in the holder’s estimated cash flows. FSP EITF 99-20-1This additional guidance did not have a material impact on the company’s financial statements.

97


     On April 9, 2009, the FASB issued three Staff Positions (FSPs)items of additional guidance intended to provide additional application guidance and enhance disclosures regarding fair value measurements and to clarify guidance on impairments of securities. FSP FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions that Are Not Orderly (FSP FAS 157-4),”securities:
     a) Additional guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 820 providedprovides guidelines for making fair value measurements more consistent with theexisting principles presented in FASB Statement No. 157. FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (FSP FAS 107-1),” now encompassed in ASC Topic 825, enhanced consistency in financial reporting by increasing the frequency offor fair value disclosures. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (FSP FAS 115-2),” now encompassed in ASC Topic 320-10-65, provided additionalmeasurement. This guidance designed to create greater clarity and consistency in accounting for and presenting impairment losses on securities.
     FSP FAS 157-4 addressedaddresses the measurement of fair value of financial assets when there is no active market or where the price inputs being used could be indicative of distressed sales. FSP FAS 157-4 reaffirmedIt also reaffirms the definition of fair value already reflected in FASB Statement No. 157,ASC Topic 820, which is the price that would be paid to sell an asset in an orderly transaction (as opposed to a distressed or forced transaction) at the measurement date under current market conditions. FSP FAS 157-4This guidance also reaffirmedreaffirms the need to use judgment to

77


ascertain if a formerly active market has become inactive and in determining fair values when markets have become inactive. FSP FAS 157-4This additional guidance became effective for the company for the period ended June 30, 2009. TheIts application of FSP FAS 157-4 did not have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note 2,3, “Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities,” and Note 16,20, “Consolidated Investment Products,” for additional details.
     FSP FAS 107-1b) Additional guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 825 enhanced consistency in financial reporting by increasing the frequency of fair value disclosures. It was issued to improve the fair value disclosures for any financial instruments that are not currently reflected on the balance sheets of companies at fair value. Prior to issuing FSP FAS 107-1,its issuance, fair values of these assets and liabilities were only disclosed on an annual basis. FSP FAS 107-1 requiredThis additional guidance requires these disclosures on a quarterly basis, providing qualitative and quantitative information about fair value estimates for all financial instruments not measured on the balance sheet at fair value. FSP FAS 107-1It became effective for the company for the period ended June 30, 2009, which required the company to make annual disclosures in its interim financial statements, which are included in Note 2,3, “Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities,” Note 3,4, “Investments,” and Note 9, “Debt.”
     FSP FAS 115-2c) Additional guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 320-10-65 provided additional clarity and consistency in accounting for and presentation of impairment losses on securities. It was intended to improve the consistency in the timing of impairment recognition and provide greater clarity to investors about the credit and noncredit components of impaired debt securities that are not expected to be sold. FSP FAS 115-2 requiredsold, and it requires increased and more timely disclosures sought by investors regarding expected cash flows, credit losses, and an aging of securities with unrealized losses. The company adopted FSP FAS 115-2this additional guidance on April 1, 2009. Upon adoption, the company recorded a cumulative effect adjustment of $1.5 million to the April 1, 2009, opening balance of retained earnings with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income.
     In May 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 165, “Subsequent Events” (FASB Statement No. 165). FASB Statement No. 165, which isadditional guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 855, “Subsequent Events,” which established general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. Specifically, FASB Statement No. 165 providedthe guidance provides clarity around the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements, and the disclosure that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. FASB Statement No. 165The additional guidance was effective for interim and annual financial reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, and was applied prospectively. On February 24, 2010 the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-09, “Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements” (ASU 2010-09). ASU 2010-09 amended itsthe guidance on subsequent events to remove the requirement for Securities and Exchange Commission filers to disclose the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events.
     In June 2009, the FASB issued additional guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 860, which addressed the effects of eliminating the qualifying special-purpose entity concept, and generally subjects those entities to the consolidation guidance applied to other VIEs now encompassed in ASC Topic 810. Specifically, the guidance introduced the concept of a participating interest, which will limit the circumstances where the transfer of a portion of a financial asset will qualify as a sale, assuming all other derecogntion criteria are met, and clarifies and amends the derecogntion criteria for determining whether a transfer qualifies for sale accounting. This additional guidance was applied prospectively to new transfers of financial assets occurring on or after January 1, 2010. It did not have a material impact on the company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
     In June 2009, the FASB issued additional guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 810 which amended certain provisions for determining whether an entity is a VIE; it requires a qualitative rather than a quantitative analysis to determine whether the company is the primary beneficiary of a VIE; it amended the consideration of related party relationships in the determination of the primary beneficiary of a VIE by providing an exception regarding de facto agency relationships in certain circumstances; it requires continuous assessments of whether the company is a VIE’s primary beneficiary; and it requires enhanced disclosures about the company’s involvement with VIEs, which are generally consistent with those disclosures required by the guidance issued in December 2008 discussed above. In February 2010 the FASB issued ASU 2010-10, a deferral of the effective date of this additional guidance for a reporting entity’s interests in certain investment funds which have attributes of investment companies, for which the reporting entity does not have an obligation to fund losses, and which are not structured as securitization entities. In addition, the deferral applies to a reporting entity’s interest in money market fund-type products. The company has determined that all of its managed funds with the exception of certain collateralized loan obligation products (CLOs) qualify for the deferral.

98


     The adoption of the additional guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 810, which was effective January 1, 2010, had a significant impact on the presentation of the company’s financial statements, as its provisions required the company to consolidate certain CLOs that were not previously consolidated. The cumulative effect adjustment upon adoption at January 1, 2010 resulted in an appropriation of retained earnings and a reclassification of other comprehensive income into retained earnings of $274.3 million and $5.2 million, respectively. The company’s Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2010 reflects the elimination of $35.4 million in management fees earned from these CLOs, and the addition of $240.9 million in interest income, $118.6 million in interest expense, and $2.6 million in net other gains. Prior to the adoption of this guidance, the company accounted for its investments in these CLOs as available-for-sale investments, with changes in the value of the company’s interests being recorded through other comprehensive income.
     Upon consolidation of the CLOs, the company’s and the CLOs’ accounting policies were effectively aligned, resulting in the reclassification of the company’s gain for the year ended December 31, 2010 of $6.4 million (representing the increase in the market value of the company’s holding in the consolidated CLOs) from other comprehensive income into other gains/losses. The company’s gain on its investment in the CLOs (before consolidation) eliminates with the company’s share of the offsetting loss on the CLOs’ debt. The $77.1 million net income impact during the year ended December 31, 2010 of consolidation of these CLOs is therefore completely attributed to other investors in these CLOs, as the company’s share has been eliminated through consolidation. The Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2010 reflects the consolidation of $6.9 billion in assets held and $5.9 billion in debt issued by these CLOs, despite the fact that the assets cannot be used by the company, nor is the company obligated for the debt. Retained earnings appropriated for investors of consolidated investment products of $495.5 million is presented as part of the company’s total equity and reflects the excess of the consolidated CLOs’ assets over their liabilities, attributable to noncontrolling third-party investors in consolidated CLOs at December 31, 2010. In addition, the company’s Consolidated Cash Flow Statement for the year ended December 31, 2010 reflects the cash flows of these CLOs. In accordance with the standard, prior periods have not been restated to reflect the consolidation of these CLOs.
     Upon adoption of this additional guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 810, the assets and liabilities of the consolidated CLOs were measured at fair value, as the determination of the carrying amounts was not practicable. The company has elected the fair value option under ASC Topic 825-10-25 to measure the assets and liabilities of all consolidated CLOs at fair value subsequent to the date of initial adoption of this additional guidance, as the company has determined that measurement of the notes issued by consolidated CLOs at fair value better correlates with the value of the assets held by consolidated CLOs, which are held to provide the cash flows for the note obligations. See Note 20, “Consolidated Investment Products,” for a consolidating balance sheet at December 31, 2010.
     In July 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles — A Replacement of FASB Statement No. 162,” (FASB Statement No. 168). FASB Statement No. 168additional guidance which replaced the existing hierarchy of U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles with the FASB ASC as the single source of authoritative U.S. accounting and reporting standards applicable for all nongovernmental entities, with the exception of guidance issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and its staff. FASB Statement No. 168This additional guidance is now encompassed in ASC Topic 105, “Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,” and was effective July 1, 2009. The company has replaced references to FASB accounting standards with ASC references, where applicable and relevant, in this Report.
     In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2009-05, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) — Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value” (ASU 2009-05). ASU 2009-05 amends Topic 820 by providing additional guidance (including illustrative examples) clarifying the measurement of liabilities at fair value. When a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, the amendments in ASU 2009-05 require that the fair value of a liability be measured using one or more of the listed valuation techniques that should maximize the use of relevant observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. In addition, the amendments in ASU 2009-05 clarify that when estimating the fair value of a liability, an entity is not required to include a separate input or adjustment to the other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. The amendments also clarify how the price of a traded debt security (i.e., an asset value) should be considered in estimating the fair value of the issuer’s liability. The amendments in ASU 2009-05 became effective for the company on October 1, 2009. The company does not have any liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The company has made the required disclosures in Note 9, “Debt.”
     In September 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2009-12, “Investments in Certain Entities that Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent)” (ASU 2009-12). ASU 2009-12 amends ASC Topic 820 to provide further guidance on how to measure the fair value of investments in alternative investments, such as hedge, private equity, real estate, venture capital, offshore and fund of funds. ASU 2009-12 permits, as a practical expedient, the measurement of fair value of an investment on the basis of the

99


net asset value per share of the investment (or its equivalent) if the net asset value of the investment (or its equivalent) is calculated in a manner consistent with ASC Topic 946, “Financial Services — Investment Companies,” including measurement of all or substantially all

78


of the fund’s underlying investments at fair value in accordance with ASC Topic 820. ASU 2009-12 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009. The adoption of ASU 2009-12 did not have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
     In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 166, “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140,” (FASB Statement No. 166), which addresses the effects of eliminating the qualifying special-purpose entity concept from FASB Statement No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities (FASB Statement No. 140), and will generally subject those entities to the consolidation guidance applied to other VIEs as provided by FASB Statement No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)” (FASB Statement No. 167). FASB Statement No. 166 is now encompassed in ASC Topic 860. FASB Statement No. 167 is now encompassed in ASC Topic 810. Specifically, FASB Statement No. 166 introduces the concept of a participating interest, which will limit the circumstances where the transfer of a portion of a financial asset will qualify as a sale, assuming all other derecogntion criteria are met, and clarifies and amends the derecogntion criteria for determining whether a transfer qualifies for sale accounting. FASB Statement No. 166 will be applied prospectively to new transfers of financial assets occurring on or after January 1, 2010. The adoption of FASB Statement No. 166 did not have a material impact on the company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
     In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 167, which addresses the effects of eliminating the qualifying special-purpose entity concept from FASB Statement No. 140 and amends certain provisions of FIN 46(R). Specifically, FASB Statement No. 167 amends certain provisions for determining whether an entity is a VIE, it requires a qualitative rather than a quantitative analysis to determine whether the company is the primary beneficiary of a VIE, it amends FIN 46(R)’s consideration of related party relationships in the determination of the primary beneficiary of a VIE by providing an exception regarding de facto agency relationships in certain circumstances, it requires continuous assessments of whether the company is a VIE’s primary beneficiary, and it requires enhanced disclosures about the company’s involvement with VIEs, which are generally consistent with those disclosures required by FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 discussed above. In February 2010, the FASB issued a deferral of the effective date of FASB Statement No. 167 for a reporting entity’s interests in certain investment funds which have attributes of investment companies, for which the reporting entity does not have an obligation to fund losses, and which are not structured as securitization entities. Accordingly, all of the company’s managed funds with the exception of certain collateralized loan and debt obligation products (CLOs) qualify for the deferral. FASB Statement No. 167, which is effective January 1, 2010, will have a significant impact on the presentation of the company’s financial statements, as its provisions will require the company to consolidate certain CLOs with approximately $6 billion in AUM at December 31, 2009, that are not currently consolidated. The company’s Consolidated Statement of Income will reflect the elimination of management and performance fees earned from these CLOs. The Consolidated Balance Sheet will reflect the collateral assets held and non-recourse debt issued by these CLOs, despite the fact that the assets cannot be used by the company, nor is the company obligated for the debt. In addition, the company’s Consolidated Cash Flow Statement will reflect the cash flows of these CLOs.
     In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements” (ASU 2010-06). ASU 2010-06 amends Topic 820 to require a number of additional disclosures regarding fair value measurements. Specifically, ASU 2010-06 requires entities to disclose: (1) the amount of significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and the reasons for these transfers; (2) the reasons for any transfers in or out of Level 3; and (3) information in the reconciliation of recurring Level 3 measurements about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis. ExceptASU 2010-06 also clarifies existing fair value disclosures about the appropriate level of disaggregation and about inputs and valuation techniques for the requirement to disclose information about purchases, sales, issuances,both recurring and settlementsnonrecurring fair value measurements that fall in the reconciliationeither Level 2 or Level 3. The new disclosures and clarifications of recurring Level 3 measurements on a gross basis, all the amendments to Topic 820 made by ASU 2010-06existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009. As such, these new2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the rollforward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The company has made the required disclosures in Note 20, “Consolidated Investment Products.” The company does not expect the additional disclosure requirements with respect to rollforward activity to have a significant impact on its disclosure.
2. BUSINESS COMBINATION AND INTEGRATION
     On June 1, 2010, Invesco acquired from Morgan Stanley its retail asset management business, including Van Kampen Investments (the “acquired business” or the “acquisition”), in exchange for an aggregate of 30.9 million shares of common stock and participating preferred stock on an as converted basis and $770.0 million in cash. The 30.9 million shares issued to Morgan Stanley included 11.7 million common shares and 19.2 million participating preferred shares as converted to common shares. Each participating preferred share issued to Morgan Stanley was convertible into 1,000 common shares upon transfer by Morgan Stanley to an unrelated third party. During July 2010, a cash payment of $2.5 million was made reflecting agreed working capital levels in the acquired business. The share issuance portion of the acquisition consideration represents a noncash financing activity related to the statement of cash flows. In November 2010, Morgan Stanley sold its 30.9 million shares, as converted, to unrelated third parties, resulting in the conversion of the participating preferred shares outstanding into common shares outstanding.
     The acquired business brought in assets under management across the equity, fixed income and alternative asset classes (including mutual funds, variable insurance funds, separate accounts and UITs).
     The transaction was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. Accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair values at the date of the transaction. Substantially all of the $372.8 million excess of the purchase price over the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities and noncontrolling interests assumed was recorded as nondeductible goodwill. The goodwill balance resulted primarily from an opening balance sheet net deferred tax liability of $295.2 million which reflects a carryover tax basis in certain assets that were acquired.

100


     The following table summarizes the initial estimates of amounts of identified assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date and at December 31, 2010, as well as the consideration transferred to acquire Morgan Stanley’s retail asset management business, including Van Kampen Investments.
             
  Initial Fair Value      Revised Fair 
$ in millions Estimate*  Adjustments*  Value Estimate 
       
ASSETS
            
Cash and cash equivalents  57.8      57.8 
Cash of consolidated investment products  4.4   12.1   16.5 
Investments  71.4      71.4 
Investments of consolidated investment products  762.3      762.3 
Receivables  81.1   (0.9)  80.2 
Receivables of consolidated investment products  11.6      11.6 
Property and equipment  3.2   0.1   3.3 
Institutional relationships intangible  18.0      18.0 
Sub-Advised relationships intangible  54.0      54.0 
Fund management contracts intangible  1,047.0      1,047.0 
Distribution relationships intangible  40.0      40.0 
Distribution agreements intangible  17.0      17.0 
Trademarks / Trade Names intangible  13.0      13.0 
Goodwill  362.7   10.1   372.8 
Other assets  18.8   15.0   33.8 
       
Total assets
  2,562.3   36.4   2,598.7 
LIABILITIES AND APPROPRIATED EQUITY
            
Accruals and accounts payables  (135.6)  (21.9)  (157.5)
Other current liabilities of consolidated investment products  (16.3)  (8.4)  (24.7)
Deferred taxation, net  (307.8)  12.6   (295.2)
Long-term debt of consolidated investment products  (630.2)     (630.2)
Retained earnings appropriated for investors of consolidated investment products  (130.7)  (18.7)  (149.4)
       
Total liabilities and appropriated equity
  (1,220.6)  (36.4)  (1,257.0)
       
Total identifiable net assets
  1,341.7      1,341.7 
       
             
Summary of consideration:            
Cash paid  770.0      770.0 
Payable to seller  2.5      2.5 
Capital stock at fair value  569.2      569.2 
       
Total cash and stock consideration
  1,341.7      1,341.7 
       
*As the company receives additional information related to the transaction, certain initially recorded estimates may change. Adjustments identified through December 31, 2010 relate primarily to the addition of cash and derivative assets and liabilities of acquired consolidated collateralized loan obligation products and the recognition of an acquired contingent liability for deferred structuring fees of $20.8 million (and related deferred tax asset $8.3 million), discounted from a maximum contractual amount of $46.4 million using a credit-adjusted risk free rate of 6.19%. The company does not expect additional material changes to the value of assets acquired or liabilities assumed in conjunction with the transaction.
     The initial opening balance sheet includes an accrual of $4.7 million related to probable legal contingencies existing at the date of the acquisition and an indemnification asset due from Morgan Stanley for the same amount. Any adjustments made to the contingent liability will be requiredresult in equal and offsetting adjustments to the receivable from Morgan Stanley. The 30.9 million aggregate common shares and participating preferred shares as converted to common shares issued to Morgan Stanley had a total fair value of $567.8 million based on the company’s opening market price of $18.38 per share on June 1, 2010, the acquisition date. The vested portion of replacement employee share-based awards had a fair value of $1.4 million.

101


     Immediately following the acquisition date, the company commenced the integration of the acquired business with its pre-existing operations. The integration of the acquired business was largely complete as of the date of the company’s Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended MarchJune 30, 2010; as such, accurate segregated expense information for (and therefore earnings generated by) the acquired business for periods subsequent to June 30, 2010 is no longer available. Prior to any significant product mergers, revenues associated with the acquired business can be separately identified, and as a result, the impact can be estimated. Operating revenues of the acquired business from the closing date of June 1 through December 31, 2010.2010 were approximately $468 million, which represents the incremental impact of the acquired business and does not represent the stand-alone results of the acquired business.
     The following unaudited proforma summary presents consolidated information of the company as if the acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2009. Transaction and integration expenses have been removed from the proforma information as they are deemed to be costs directly attributable to the acquired business. These pro forma results are not indicative of the actual results of operations that would have been achieved nor are they indicative of future results of operations.
         
  For the year ended December 31,
$ in millions 2010 2009
Operating Revenues  3,805.4   3,264.9 
Net income  607.8   353.5 
     During the year ended December 31, 2010, the company incurred $150.0 million of transaction and integration costs ($103.1 million net of taxation). Transaction and integration costs include acquisition-related charges incurred during the period to effect a business combination and do not represent ongoing costs of the fully integrated combined organization. They include legal, regulatory, advisory, valuation, integration-related employee incentive awards and other professional or consulting fees, general and administrative costs, including travel costs related to the transaction and the costs of temporary staff involved in executing the transaction, and post-closing costs of integrating the acquired business into the company’s existing operations including incremental costs associated with achieving synergy savings. Additionally, transaction and integration expenses include legal costs related to the defense of auction rate preferred securities complaints raised in the pre-acquisition period with respect to various closed-end funds included in the acquisition obtained as part of the acquired business. See Note 19, “Commitments and Contingencies” for additional information. The following table presents acquisition-related and integration-related charges incurred during the period.
For the year ended
$ in millionsDecember 31, 2010
Acquisition-related charges5.7
Integration-related charges:
Staff costs39.1
Technology, contractor and related costs53.4
Professional services51.8
Total integration-related charges144.3
Total transaction and integration charges(1)
150.0
(1)The company incurred $4.3 million of acquisition-related costs and $6.5 million of integration-related costs during 2009, which are not reflected in this table.

79102


2.3. FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
     The carrying value and fair value of financial instruments is presented in the below summary table:table. The fair value of financial instruments held by consolidated investment products is presented in Note 20, “Consolidated Investment Products.”
                                        
 December 31, 2009 December 31, 2008 December 31, 2010 December 31, 2009
 Footnote Carrying Carrying   Footnote Carrying Carrying  
$ in millions Reference Value Fair Value Value Fair Value Reference Value Fair Value Value Fair Value
Cash and cash equivalents 2 762.0 762.0 585.2 585.2  740.5 740.5 762.0 762.0 
Available for sale investments 2,3 115.2 115.2 103.9 103.9  4 100.0 100.0 92.7 92.7 
Assets held for policyholders 4 1,283.0 1,283.0 840.2 840.2  1,295.4 1,295.4 1,283.0 1,283.0 
Trading investments 2,3 84.6 84.6 36.2 36.2  4 180.6 180.6 84.6 84.6 
Support agreements 16,20  (2.5)  (2.5)  (5.5)  (5.5)
Foreign time deposits* 4 28.2 28.2 22.5 22.5 
Support agreements* 19, 20  (2.0)  (2.0)  (2.5)  (2.5)
Policyholder payables 4  (1,283.0)  (1,283.0)  (840.2)  (840.2)  (1,295.4)  (1,295.4)  (1,283.0)  (1,283.0)
Current maturities of total debt 9    (297.2)  (277.3)
Long-term debt 9  (745.7)  (765.5)  (862.0)  (711.2)
         
 213.6 193.8  (439.4)  (268.7)
         
Financial instruments sold, not yet purchased  (0.7)  (0.7)   
Derivative liabilities  (0.1)  (0.1)   
Note Payable  (18.9)  (18.9)   
Long-term debt* 9  (1,315.7)  (1,339.3)  (745.7)  (765.5)
*These financial instruments are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis. See the indicated footnotes for additional information about the carrying and fair values of these financial instruments. Foreign time deposits are measured at cost plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value.
     A three-level valuation hierarchy exists for disclosure of fair value measurements based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows:
Level 1 — inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
Level 2 — inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
Level 3 — inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
     An asset or liability’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
     There are three types of valuation approaches: a market approach, which uses observable prices and other relevant information that is generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities; an income approach, which uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single, discounted present value amount; and a cost approach, which is based on the amount that currently would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset.
     The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, as well as the general classification of such assets and liabilities pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.
Cash equivalents
     Cash equivalents include cash investments in money market funds and time deposits. Cash and cash equivalents invested in affiliated money market funds totaled $465.1$289.6 million at December 31, 20092010 (December 31, 2008: $209.42009: $465.1 million). Cash investments in money market funds are valued under the market approach through the use of quoted market prices in an active market, which is the net asset value of the underlying funds, and are classified within level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Cash investments in time deposits of $90.5 million at December 31, 2009 (December 31, 2008: $156.4 million) are very short-term in nature and are accordingly valued at cost plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value, and are classified within level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.

103


Available-for-sale investments
     Available-for-sale investments include amounts seeded into affiliated investment products, foreign time deposits and investments in affiliated collateralized loan obligations (CLOs).CLOs. Seed money is valued under the market approach through the use of quoted market prices available in an active market and is classified within level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.hierarchy; there is no modeling or additional information needed to arrive at the fair values of these investments. Seed money investments are investments held in Invesco managed funds with the purpose of providing capital to the funds during their development periods. These investments are recorded at fair value using quoted market prices in active markets; there is no modeling or additional information needed to arrive at the fair values of these investments. Foreign time deposits are valued under the income approach based on observable interest rates and are classified within level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. CLOs are valued using an income approach

80


through the use of certain observable and unobservable inputs. Due to current liquidity constraints within the market for CLO products that require the use of unobservable inputs, these investments are classified as level 3 within the valuation hierarchy. An increase or decrease in the discount rate of 1.0% would change the discounted cash flows of the CLOs by $0.6 million (2008: $0.5 million).
Trading investments
     Trading investments primarily include the investments of the deferred compensation plans that are offered to certain Invesco employees. These investments are primarily invested in affiliated funds that are held to economically hedge current and non-current deferred compensation liabilities. Trading securities are valued under the market approach through the use of quoted prices in an active market and are classified within level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.
Assets held for policyholders
     Assets held for policyholders represent investments held by one of the company’s subsidiaries, which is an insurance entity that was established to facilitate retirement savings plans in the U.K. The assets held for policyholders are accounted for at fair value pursuant to ASC Topic 944, “Financial Services — Insurance,” and are comprised primarily of affiliated unitized funds. The assets are measured at fair value under the market approach based on the quoted prices of the underlying funds in an active market and are classified within level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. The policyholder liabilitiespayables are indexed to the value of the assets held for policyholders.
Trading investments
     Trading investments include investments held to hedge economically against costs the company incurs in connection with certain deferred compensation plans in which the company participates, as well as trading and investing activities in equity and debt securities entered into in its capacity as sponsor of UITs.
Investments related to deferred compensation plans
Investments related to deferred compensation plans are primarily invested in affiliated funds that are held to hedge economically current and non-current deferred compensation liabilities. Investments related to deferred compensation plans are valued under the market approach through the use of quoted prices in an active market and are classified within level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.
UIT-related equity and debt securities
At December 31, 2010, UIT-related equity and debt securities consisted of investments in corporate stock, UITs, and U.S. state and political subdivision securities. Each is discussed more fully below.
oCorporate stock
The company temporarily holds investments in corporate stock for purposes of creating a UIT. Corporate stocks are valued under the market approach through use of quoted prices on an exchange. To the extent these securities are actively traded, valuation adjustments are not applied and they are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy; otherwise, they are categorized in Level 2.
oUITs
The company may hold units of its sponsored UITs at period-end for sale in the primary market or secondary market. Equity UITs are valued under the market approach through use of quoted prices on an exchange. Fixed income UITs are valued using recently executed transaction prices, market price quotations (where observable), bond spreads, or credit default swap spreads. The spread data used is for the same maturities as the underlying bonds. If the spread data does not reference the issuers, then data that references comparable issuers is used. When observable price quotations are not available, fair value is determined based on cash flow models with yield curves, bond or single name credit default spreads, and recovery rates based on collateral value as key inputs. Depending on the nature of the inputs, these investments are categorized as Level 1, 2, or 3.
oU.S. state and political subdivision securities
U.S. state and political subdivision (collectively ‘municipal’) securities are valued using recently executed transaction prices, market price quotations (where observable), bond spreads, or credit default swap spreads. The spread data used is for the same maturities as the underlying bonds. If the spread data does not reference the issuers, then data that references comparable issuers is used. When observable price quotations are not available, fair value is determined based on cash flow models with yield curves, bond or single name credit default spreads, and recovery rates based on collateral value as key inputs. Depending on the nature of the inputs, these investments are categorized as Level 1, 2, or 3.

104


UIT-related financial instruments sold, not yet purchased, and derivative liabilities
     The company uses U.S. Treasury futures, which are types of derivative financial instruments, to hedge economically fixed income UIT inventory and securities in order to mitigate market risk. Open futures contracts are marked to market daily through earnings, which is recorded in the company’s consolidated statement of income in other revenue, along with the mark-to-market on the underlying trading securities held. Fair values of derivative contracts in an asset position are included in other assets in the company’s consolidated balance sheet. Fair values of derivative contracts in a liability position are included in other liabilities in the company’s consolidated balance sheet. These derivative contracts are valued under the market approach through use of quoted prices in an active market and are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. At December 31, 2010 there were 76 futures contracts with a notional value of $9.3 million. Additionally, to hedge economically the market risk associated with equity and debt securities and UITs temporarily held as trading investments, the company will hold short corporate stock, exchange-traded fund, or U.S. treasury security positions. These transactions are recorded as financial instruments sold, not yet purchased and are included in other liabilities in the company’s consolidated balance sheet. To the extent these securities are actively traded, valuation adjustments are not applied and they are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy; otherwise, they are categorized in Level 2.
Note payable
     The note payable represents a payable linked to the aggregate amount of distributions proportional to Invesco’s acquired ownership interest in two consolidated real estate funds. As the underlying investments in the funds are carried at fair value (and are disclosed as Level 3 assets in the fair value hierarchy table included in Note 20, “Consolidated Investment Products”), management elected the fair value option for the note payable in order to offset the fair value movements recognized from the funds and has recorded the note payable as a Level 3 liability. The fair value of the note payable represents its remaining principal balance adjusted for changes in equity of the funds that is attributable to the company’s ownership interest in the funds.

105


     The following table presents, for each of the hierarchy levels described above, the carrying value of the company’s assets and liabilities, including major security type for equity and debt securities, which are measured at fair value on the face of the statement of financial position as of December 31, 2009.2010.
                                
 As of December 31, 2009 As of December 31, 2010
 Quoted Prices in     Quoted Prices in    
 Active Markets for Significant Other Significant Active Markets for Significant Other Significant
 Fair Value Identical Assets Observable Inputs Unobservable Inputs Fair Value Identical Assets Observable Inputs Unobservable Inputs
$ in millions Measurements (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Measurements (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
Current assets:  
Cash equivalents:  
Money market funds 498.6 498.6    316.4 316.4   
Time deposits 90.5  90.5  
Investments:*  
Available-for-sale:  
Seed money 74.8 74.8    99.5 99.5   
Foreign time deposits 22.5  22.5  
Trading investments:  
Investments related to deferred compensation plans 84.6 84.6    165.5 165.5   
UIT-related equity and debt securities: 
Corporate stock 1.2 1.2   
UITs 4.0 4.0   
U.S. state and political subdivisions securities 9.9  9.9  
Assets held for policyholders 1,283.0 1,283.0    1,295.4 1,295.4   
                  
Total current assets 2,054.0 1,941.0 113.0   1,891.9 1,882.0 9.9  
                  
Non-current assets:  
Investments — available-for-sale: 
Collateralized loan obligations 17.9   17.9 
Investments — available-for-sale*: 
CLOs** 0.5   0.5 
                  
Total assets at fair value 2,071.9 1,941.0 113.0 17.9  1,892.4 1,882.0 9.9 0.5 
                  
 
Current liabilities: 
Policyholder payables  (1,295.4)  (1,295.4)   
UIT-related financial instruments sold, not yet purchased: 
Corporate equities  (0.7)  (0.7)   
U.S. Treasury securities     
UIT-related derivative liabilities  (0.1)  (0.1)   
Non-current liabilities: 
Note payable  (18.9)    (18.9)
         
Total liabilities at fair value  (1,315.1)  (1,296.2)   (18.9)
         
 
* OtherCurrent foreign time deposits of $28.2 million and other current investments of $0.5 million are excluded from this table. Other non-current equity method and othercost method investments of $134.7$156.9 million and $4.8$7.0 million, respectively, are also excluded from this table. These investments are not measured at fair value, in accordance with applicable accounting standards.
**The company adopted guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 810 on January 1, 2010, resulting in the consolidation of CLOs for which the company has an underlying investment of $23.3 million at December 31, 2010 (before consolidation). In accordance with the standard, prior periods have not been restated to reflect the consolidation of these CLOs.

81106


     The following table presents, for each of the hierarchy levels described above, the carrying value of the company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value as of December 31, 2008:2009:
                 
  As of December 31, 2008
      Quoted Prices in    
      Active Markets for Significant Other Significant
  Fair Value Identical Assets Observable Inputs Unobservable Inputs
$ in millions Measurements (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
Current assets                
Cash equivalents  365.8   209.4   156.4    
Investments*:                
Available-for-sale  86.4   69.1   17.3    
Trading investments  36.2   36.2       
Assets held for policyholders  840.2   840.2       
                 
Total current assets  1,328.6   1,154.9   173.7    
                 
Non-current assets:                
Investments — available-for-sale*  17.5         17.5 
                 
Total assets at fair value  1,346.1   1,154.9   173.7   17.5 
                 
                 
  As of December 31, 2009
      Quoted Prices in    
      Active Markets for Significant Other Significant
  Fair Value Identical Assets Observable Inputs Unobservable Inputs
$ in millions Measurements (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
Current assets:                
Cash equivalents:                
Money market funds  498.6   498.6       
Investments:*                
Available-for-sale:                
Seed money  74.8   74.8       
Trading investments:                
Investments related to deferred compensation plans  84.6   84.6       
Assets held for policyholders  1,283.0   1,283.0       
                 
Total current assets  1,941.0   1,941.0       
                 
Non-current assets:                
Investments — available-for-sale:                
CLOs  17.9         17.9 
                 
Total assets at fair value  1,958.9   1,941.0      17.9 
                 
                 
Current liabilities:                
Policyholder payables  (1,283.0)  (1,283.0)      
                 
Total liabilities at fair value  (1,283.0)  (1,283.0)      
                 
 
* OtherCurrent foreign time deposits of $22.5 million and other current investments of $1.0$0.5 million are excluded from this table. Other non-current equity method and other investments of $103.8$134.7 million and $4.8 million, respectively, are also excluded from this table. These investments are not measured at fair value, in accordance with applicable accounting standards.
     The following table shows a reconciliation of the beginning and ending fair value measurements for level 3 assets during the year ending December 31, 2010, which are comprised solely of CLOs, and are valued using significant unobservable inputs:
                
 Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended
$ in millions December 31, 2009 December 31, 2008 December 31, 2010 December 31, 2009
Beginning balance 17.5 39.0  17.9 17.5 
Net unrealized gains and losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)* 6.4 2.8 
Adoption of guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 810*  (17.4)  
     
Beginning balance, as adjusted 0.5 17.5 
Net unrealized gains and losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)** 0.1 6.4 
Purchases and issuances  1.5    
Other-than-temporary impairment included in other gains and losses, net  (5.2)  (22.7)   (5.2)
Return of capital  (0.8)  (3.1)  (0.1)  (0.8)
          
Ending balance 17.9 17.5  0.5 17.9 
          
 
*The company adopted guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 810 on January 1, 2010, resulting in the consolidation of CLOs for which the company has an underlying investment of $23.3 million at December 31, 2010 (before consolidation). The adjustment of $17.4 million in the table above reflects the elimination of the company’s equity interest upon adoption. In accordance with the standard, prior periods have not been restated to reflect the consolidation of these CLOs.
** Of these net unrealized gains and losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss), $6.4$0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009,2010 is attributed to the change in unrealized gains and losses related to assets still held at December 31, 2009.2010.
3. INVESTMENTS
Current Investments
         
$ in millions 2009 2008
Available-for-sale investments:        
Seed money  74.8   69.1 
Foreign time deposits  22.5   17.3 
Trading investments:        
Investments related to deferred compensation plans  84.6   35.5 
Other     0.7 
Other  0.5   1.0 
         
Total current investments  182.4   123.6 
         

82107


4. INVESTMENTS
The disclosures below include details of the company’s investments. Investments held by consolidated investment products are detailed in Note 20, “Consolidated Investment Products.”
Current Investments
         
  As of
  December 31, December 31,
$ in millions 2010 2009
Available-for-sale investments:        
Seed money  99.5   74.8 
Trading investments:        
Investments related to deferred compensation plans  165.5   84.6 
UIT-related equity and debt securities  15.1    
Foreign time deposits  28.2   22.5 
Other  0.5   0.5 
         
Total current investments  308.8   182.4 
         
Non-current Investments
        
 As of
         December 31, December 31,
$ in millions 2009 2008 2010 2009
Available-for-sale investments:  
Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) 17.9 17.5 
Other  8.5 
CLOs 0.5 17.9 
Equity method investments 134.7 95.3  156.9 134.7 
Other 4.8   7.0 4.8 
          
Total non-current investments 157.4 121.3  164.4 157.4 
          
     The portion of trading gains and losses for the year ended December 31, 2009,2010, that relates to trading securities still held at December 31, 2009,2010, was a $8.6 million net gain (December 31, 2009: a $18.6 million (December 31, 2008: $18.7 million)net gain).
     Realized gains and losses recognized in the income statement during the year from investments classified as available-for-sale are as follows:
                                                        
 2009 2008 2007 2010 2009 2008
 Proceeds Gross Gross Proceeds Gross Gross Proceeds Gross Gross Proceeds Gross Gross Proceeds Gross Gross Proceeds Gross Gross
 from Realized Realized from Realized Realized from Realized Realized from Realized Realized from Realized Realized from Realized Realized
$ in millions Sales Gains Losses Sales Gains Losses Sales Gains Losses Sales Gains Losses Sales Gains Losses Sales Gains Losses
Current available-for-sale investments 47.5 4.5  (1.6) 73.9 1.6  (1.7) 102.8 20.6   64.5 9.9  (1.3) 47.5 4.5  (1.6) 73.9 1.6  (1.7)
Non-current available-for-sale investments 2.2 1.4  10.6 7.4  9.0 2.6  (5.4) 0.2   2.2 1.4  10.6 7.4  
     Upon the sale of available-for-sale securities, net realized gains of $8.6 million, $4.3 million $7.3 million and $17.8$7.3 million were transferred from accumulated other comprehensive income into the Consolidated Statements of Income during 2010, 2009, 2008, and 2007,2008, respectively. The specific identification method is used to determine the realized gain or loss on securities sold or otherwise disposed.

108


     Gross unrealized holding gains and losses recognized in other accumulated comprehensive income from available-for-sale investments are presented in the table below:
                                  
 2009 2008 December 31, 2010 December 31, 2009
 Gross Gross Gross Gross   Gross Gross Gross Gross  
 Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized   Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized  
 Holding Holding Fair Holding Holding Fair Holding Holding Fair Holding Holding Fair
$ in millions Cost Gains Losses Value Cost Gains Losses Value Cost Gains Losses Value Cost Gains Losses Value
Current:  
Seed money 74.7 5.9  (5.8) 74.8 78.9 3.7  (13.5) 69.1  89.6 10.6  (0.7) 99.5 74.7 5.9  (5.8) 74.8 
Foreign time deposits 22.5   22.5 17.3   17.3 
Other     1.0   1.0 
                                  
Current available-for-sale investments 97.2 5.9  (5.8) 97.3 97.2 3.7  (13.5) 87.4  89.6 10.6  (0.7) 99.5 74.7 5.9  (5.8) 74.8 
Non-current:  
CLOs 12.6 5.3  17.9 17.1 0.4  17.5 
Other     6.8 1.7  8.5 
CLOs* 0.3 0.2  0.5 12.6 5.3  17.9 
                                  
Non-current available-for-sale investments: 12.6 5.3  17.9 23.9 2.1  26.0  0.3 0.2  0.5 12.6 5.3  17.9 
                                  
 109.8 11.2  (5.8) 115.2 121.1 5.8  (13.5) 113.4  89.9 10.8  (0.7) 100.0 87.3 11.2  (5.8) 92.7 
                                  
*The company adopted guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 810 on January 1, 2010, resulting in the consolidation of CLOs for which the company has an underlying investment of $23.3 million at December 31, 2010 (before consolidation). In accordance with the standard, prior periods have not been restated to reflect the consolidation of these CLOs.
     Available-for-sale debt securities as of December 31, 2009,2010, by maturity, are set out below:
     
  Available-for-Sale
$ in millions (Fair Value)
Less than one year  22.5 
One to five years   
Five to ten years  6.20.5 
Greater than ten years  11.7 
     
Total available-for-sale  40.40.5 
     

83

     The following table provides the breakdown of available-for-sale investments with unrealized losses at December 31, 2010:


                         
  Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or Greater Total
      Gross     Gross     Gross
      Unrealized     Unrealized     Unrealized
$ in millions Fair Value Losses Fair Value Losses Fair Value Losses
Seed money (40 funds)  0.4      5.7   (0.7)  6.1   (0.7)
     The following table provides the breakdown of available-for-sale investments with unrealized losses at December 31, 2009:
                         
  Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or Greater Total
      Gross     Gross     Gross
      Unrealized     Unrealized     Unrealized
$ in millions Fair Value Losses Fair Value Losses Fair Value Losses
Seed money (44 funds)  5.7   (0.3)  25.1   (5.5)  30.8   (5.8)
     The following table provides the breakdown of available-for-sale investments with unrealized losses at December 31, 2008:
                         
  Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or Greater Total
      Gross     Gross     Gross
      Unrealized     Unrealized     Unrealized
$ in millions Fair Value Losses Fair Value Losses Fair Value Losses
Seed money  47.1   (12.8)  8.7   (0.7)  55.8   (13.5)
     As of December 31, 2009, the company reviewed the cash flow estimates of its CLOs, which are based on the underlying pools of securities and take into account the overall credit quality of the issuers, the forecasted default rates of the securities, and the company’s past experience in managing similar securities. These estimates of future cash flows, taking into account both timing and amounts and discounted using appropriate discount rates, indicated a sustained decline in valuation, resulting in credit-related other-than-temporary impairment charges recorded in other gains and losses, net, on the Consolidated Statement of Income during the year ended December 31, 2009, of $5.2 million (December 31, 2008: $22.7 million). These securities may recover their value over time; the company does not intend to sell its CLO investments before maturity.
     As discussed in Note 1, “Accounting Policies,” the company adopted FSP FAS 115-2, now encompassed in ASC Topic 320, on April 1, 2009. Upon adoption, the company recorded a cumulative effect adjustment of $1.5 million to the April 1, 2009, opening balance of retained earnings with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income, representing the non-credit component of previously-recognized other-than-temporary impairment. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2009, $0.3 million was recorded as a charge to other comprehensive income from other-than-temporary impairment related to non-credit related factors, primarily the change in discount rates during the period, representing the total other-than-temporary impairment recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income. A rollforward of the cumulative credit-related other-than-temporary impairment charges recognized in earnings for which some portion of the impairment was recorded in other comprehensive income is as follows:
Nine months ended
In millionsDecember 31, 2009
Beginning balance17.1
Additional credit losses recognized during the period related to securities for which:
No OTTI has been previously recognized
OTTI has been previously recognized1.7
Ending balance18.8
     The company recorded other-than-temporary impairment charges (OTTI) on seed money investments of $3.0$6.7 million in 2009 (2008: $8.52010 (2009: $3.0 million). The gross unrealized losses of seed money investments were primarily caused by declines in the market value of the underlying funds and foreign exchange movements. After conducting a review of the financial condition and near-term prospects of the underlying securities in the seeded funds as well as the severity and duration of the impairment, the company does not consider any material portion of its remaining gross unrealized losses on these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired. The securities are expected to recover their value over time and the company has the intent and ability to hold the securities until this recovery occurs.

109


     As discussed in Note 1, “Accounting Policies,” the company adopted guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 320, on April 1, 2009. Upon adoption, the company recorded a cumulative effect adjustment of $1.5 million to the April 1, 2009, opening balance of retained earnings with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income, representing the non-credit component of previously-recognized OTTI. During the year ended December 31, 2010, there were no charges to other comprehensive income from other-than-temporary impairment related to non-credit related factors. A rollforward of the cumulative credit-related other-than-temporary impairment charges recognized in earnings for which some portion of the impairment was recorded in other comprehensive income is as follows:
         
  Year ended December Nine months ended
In millions 31, 2010 December 31, 2009*
Beginning balance  18.8   17.1 
Adoption of guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 810**  (18.0)   
         
Beginning balance, as adjusted  0.8   17.1 
Additional credit losses recognized during the period related to securities for which:        
No OTTI has been previously recognized      
OTTI has been previously recognized     1.7 
         
Ending balance  0.8   18.8 
         
*The guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 320 was effective on April 1, 2009. Credit-related OTTI recorded in other gains and losses, net, on the Consolidated Statement of Income during the year ended December 31, 2009 was $5.2 million.
**The company adopted guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 810 on January 1, 2010, resulting in the consolidation of CLOs for which the company has an underlying investment of $23.3 million at December 31, 2010 (before consolidation). Of the $18.8 million cumulative credit-related OTTI balance at January 1, 2010, $18.0 million relates to CLOs that were consolidated into the company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet, resulting in the elimination of our equity interest.
     The company owns 100% of the voting control of its subsidiary entities, directly or indirectly, with the exception of the following entities, which are consolidated with resulting noncontrolling interests:
         
  Country of  
Name of Company Incorporation % Voting Interest Owned
India Asset Recovery Management Limited India  80.1%

84


     Following are the company’s investments in joint ventures and affiliates, which are accounted for using the equity method and are recorded as long-termnon-current investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
         
  Country of  
Name of Company Incorporation % Voting Interest Owned
Invesco Great Wall Fund Management Company Limited China  49.0%
Huaneng Invesco WLR Investment Consulting Company Limited China  50.0%
Pocztylion — ARKA Poland  29.3%
     Undistributed earnings from equity method investees have not been a material restriction on the company’s ability to pay dividends to shareholders. Equity method investments also include the company’s investments in various of its sponsored private equity, real estate and other investment entities. The company’s investment is generally less than 5% of the capital of these entities. These entities include variable interest entities for which the company has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary and other investment products structured as partnerships for which the company is the general partner and the other limited partners possess either substantive kick-out, liquidation or participation rights. See Note 16,20, “Consolidated Investment Products,” for additional information. Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates for the year ended December 31, 2009, was $27.0 million (2008: $46.8 million; 2007: $48.1 million).
4. ASSETS HELD FOR POLICYHOLDERS AND POLICYHOLDER PAYABLES
     One of the company’s subsidiaries, Invesco Perpetual Life Limited, is an insurance company which was established to facilitate retirement savings plans in the U.K. The entity holds assets on its balance sheet that are legally segregated and are generally not subject to claims that arise from any other Invesco business and which are managed for its clients with an offsetting liability. Both the asset and the liability are reported at fair value. At December 31, 2009, the assets held for policyholders and the linked policyholder payables were $1,283.0 million (2008: $840.2 million). Changes in the fair values of these assets and liabilities are recorded in the income statement, where they offset, because the value of the policyholder payables is linked to the value of the assets held for policyholders.

85110


5. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
     Changes in property and equipment balances are as follows:
                                            
 Technology and Other Leasehold  Technology and Other Land and Work In Leasehold  
$ in millions Equipment Software Land and Buildings* Improvements Total Equipment Software Buildings* Process Improvements Total
Cost:
 
January 1, 2010 282.5 231.3 72.5 11.5 141.3 739.1 
Foreign exchange 1.7  (1.1)  (1.4)  (0.1) 1.3 0.4 
Additions** 10.0 7.4 1.0 78.2 3.5 100.1 
Transfers 28.3 28.6   (70.0) 13.1  
Disposals  (4.1)  (0.1)     (4.2)
             
December 31, 2010
 318.4 266.1 72.1 19.6 159.2 835.4 
             
Accumulated depreciation:
 
January 1, 2010  (245.5)  (165.3)  (7.5)   (100.1)  (518.4)
Foreign exchange  (2.1) 0.8 0.3   (1.4)  (2.4)
Depreciation expense  (18.2)  (19.6)  (1.2)   (7.4)  (46.4)
Disposals 4.1 0.1    4.2 
             
December 31, 2010
  (261.7)  (184.0)  (8.4)   (108.9)  (563.0)
             
Net book value:
 
December 31, 2010
 56.7 82.1 63.7 19.6 50.3 272.4 
             
Cost:
  
January 1, 2009 281.8 191.9 65.0 132.6 671.3  270.2 191.9 65.0 11.6 132.6 671.3 
Foreign exchange 7.9 4.9 6.6 5.0 24.4  7.9 4.9 6.6  5.0 24.4 
Additions 15.1 30.8 0.9 6.2 53.0  8.1 5.2 0.9 35.0 3.8 53.0 
Transfers  (7.8) 6.8  1.0   3.3 29.5   (35.1) 2.3  
Disposals  (7.0)  (0.2)   (2.4)  (9.6)  (7.0)  (0.2)    (2.4)  (9.6)
                        
December 31, 2009
 290.0 234.2 72.5 142.4 739.1  282.5 231.3 72.5 11.5 141.3 739.1 
                        
Accumulated depreciation:
  
January 1, 2009  (233.2)  (146.3)  (5.9)  (80.6)  (466.0)  (233.2)  (146.3)  (5.9)   (80.6)  (466.0)
Foreign exchange  (7.7)  (4.0)  (0.7)  (4.3)  (16.7)  (7.7)  (4.0)  (0.7)   (4.3)  (16.7)
Depreciation expense  (11.6)  (15.0)  (0.9)  (17.5)  (45.0)  (11.6)  (15.0)  (0.9)   (17.5)  (45.0)
Disposals 7.0   2.3 9.3  7.0    2.3 9.3 
                        
December 31, 2009
  (245.5)  (165.3)  (7.5)  (100.1)  (518.4)  (245.5)  (165.3)  (7.5)   (100.1)  (518.4)
                        
Net book value:
  
December 31, 2009
 44.5 68.9 65.0 42.3 220.7  37.0 66.0 65.0 11.5 41.2 220.7 
                        
Cost:
 
January 1, 2008 340.5 237.9 84.1 124.9 787.4 
Foreign exchange  (13.4)  (14.8)  (20.4)  (7.8)  (56.4)
Additions 28.5 25.9 1.3 28.6 84.3 
Disposals  (73.8)  (57.1)   (13.1)  (144.0)
           
December 31, 2008
 281.8 191.9 65.0 132.6 671.3 
           
Accumulated depreciation:
 
January 1, 2008  (307.2)  (203.3)  (6.7)  (90.2)  (607.4)
Foreign exchange 11.6 12.7 2.0 6.5 32.8 
Depreciation expense  (9.2)  (12.8)  (1.2)  (9.4)  (32.6)
Disposals 71.6 57.1  12.5 141.2 
           
December 31, 2008
  (233.2)  (146.3)  (5.9)  (80.6)  (466.0)
           
Net book value:
 
December 31, 2008
 48.6 45.6 59.1 52.0 205.3 
           
 
* Included within land and buildings are $33.7$33.2 million at December 31, 2009 (2008: $30.62010 (2009: $33.7 million), in non-depreciable land assets.
**Included within additions is $5.4 million at December 31, 2010 related to the acquired businesses.

86111


6. INTANGIBLE ASSETS
     IntangibleThe following table presents the major classes of the company’s intangible assets are predominantly investmentat December 31, 2010 and 2009:
                 
              Weighted
              Average
  Gross Book Accumulated Net Book Amortization
$ in millions Value Amortization Value Period (years)
December 31, 2010
                
Management contracts — indefinite-lived  1,161.7   N/A   1,161.7   N/A 
Management contracts — finite-lived  199.7   (87.0)  112.7   9.0 
Customer relationships  40.0   (1.9)  38.1   12.0 
Distribution agreements  17.0   (2.5)  14.5   4.0 
Trademarks / Trade names  13.0   (3.8)  9.2   2.0 
Other  3.6   (2.6)  1.0   6.1 
                 
Total
  1,435.0   (97.8)  1,337.2   8.8 
                 
                 
December 31, 2009
                
Management contracts — indefinite-lived  110.6   N/A   110.6   N/A 
Management contracts — finite-lived  103.4   (75.8)  27.6   9.3 
Other  2.8   (1.9)  0.9   5.0 
                 
Total
  216.8   (77.7)  139.1   9.0 
                 
     The acquisitions of Morgan Stanley’s retail asset management business, including Van Kampen Investments on June 1, 2010, Concord Capital on August 16, 2010, and AIG Asia Real Estate on December 31, 2010, collectively added $173.1 million of finite-lived intangible assets at their respective acquisition dates.
     Where evidence exists that the underlying management contracts acquired through acquisitions. Amortizationhave a high likelihood of investmentcontinued renewal at little or no cost to the company, the intangible asset is assigned an indefinite life. The acquisition of Morgan Stanley’s retail asset management business, including Van Kampen Investments, added $1,047.0 million of indefinite-lived intangible assets to the company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 1, 2010, also as discussed in Note 2, “Business Combination and Integration,” above. Indefinite-lived intangible assets primarily relate to management contracts and related rights to manage the assets acquired during the June 1, 2010 acquisition. The 2010, 2009 and 2008 annual impairment reviews of indefinite-lived intangible assets determined that no impairment existed at the respective review dates.
     Amortization expense was $30.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2010 (2009: $12.6 million) and is included within generalGeneral and administrativeAdministrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The weighted average amortization period of intangible assets is nine years. The company performed its annual impairment review of indefinite-lived intangible assets as of October 1, 2009. As a result of that analysis, the company determined that no impairment existed.
         
$ in millions 2009 2008
Cost:
        
January 1  207.8   205.9 
Foreign exchange  0.2   (0.1)
Business acquisitions     2.0 
Other additions  8.8    
         
December 31
  216.8   207.8 
         
Accumulated amortization:
        
January 1  (65.0)  (51.7)
Foreign exchange  (0.1)   
Amortization expense  (12.6)  (13.3)
         
December 31
  (77.7)  (65.0)
         
Net book value:
        
December 31
  139.1   142.8 
         
     Management contracts include $110.5 million of amounts primarily related to exchange-traded fund contracts acquired during the 2006 acquisition of PowerShares Capital Management LLC. These management contracts have indefinite lives and therefore are not subject to amortization.
Estimated amortization expense for each of the five succeeding fiscal years based upon the company’s intangible assets at December 31, 2009,2010 is as follows:
     
Years Ended December 31,    
 
$ in millions    
2010  12.0 
2011  8.0 
2012  4.3 
2013  3.6 
2014  0.6 
Years Ended December 31,
     
$ in millions    
2011  34.6 
2012  27.1 
2013  23.8 
2014  18.3 
2015  16.0 
7. GOODWILL
     The table below details changes in the goodwill balance:
             
  Gross Book Accumulated Net Book
$ in millions Value Impairment Value
January 1, 2008  6,864.6   (16.6)  6,848.0 
Business acquisitions — earn-outs  43.8      43.8 
Other adjustments  1.3      1.3 
Foreign exchange  (926.3)     (926.3)
             
December 31, 2008
  5,983.4   (16.6)  5,966.8 
             
             
January 1, 2009  5,983.4   (16.6)  5,966.8 
Business acquisitions — earn-outs  34.2      34.2 
Other adjustments         
Foreign exchange  466.6      466.6 
             
December 31, 2009
  6,484.2   (16.6)  6,467.6 
             
             
  Gross Book Accumulated Net Book
$ in millions Value Impairment Value
January 1, 2010  6,484.2   (16.6)  6,467.6 
Business combinations  440.0      440.0 
Foreign exchange  72.6      72.6 
             
December 31, 2010
  6,996.8   (16.6)  6,980.2 
             
             
January 1, 2009  5,983.4   (16.6)  5,966.8 
Business combinations  34.2      34.2 
Foreign exchange  466.6      466.6 
             
December 31, 2009
  6,484.2   (16.6)  6,467.6 
             

87112


     The acquisitions of Morgan Stanley’s retail asset management business, including Van Kampen Investments, Concord Capital, and AIG Asia Real Estate collectively added $399.6 million to the company’s annualConsolidated Balance Sheet at their respective acquisition dates. The 2010 earn-out calculations related to the 2006 acquisition of W.L. Ross & Co. resulted in an addition to goodwill impairment review is performed as of October 1 of each year. Separately, if needed, interim impairment tests are performed if there are indicators that an impairment may have occurred. The impairment tests involve a comparison of the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying value. If a test concludes that the fair value is below the carrying value, a process of separately valuing each class of asset$40.4 million (2009 earn-out goodwill addition: $34.2 million). See Note 19, “Commitments and liability is followed to determine the impairment adjustment.Contingencies,” for additional information.
     Both theThe 2010, 2009 and 2008 annual impairment reviews determined that no impairment existed at the respective review dates. Separately, due to deteriorating market conditions, interim impairment tests were performed at October 31, 2008, and March 31, 2009. These interim tests also concluded that no impairment had occurred. As each test concluded that the fair value was above the carrying value, there was no need to progressproceed to step two of the process ofgoodwill impairment test, which would have required separately valuing each class of asset and liability. Following the March 31, 2009 interim test, the general market conditions improved and the company did not identify the need for further interim tests during 2009, as no indicators of impairment existed. No interim impairment tests were deemed necessary during 2010.
8. OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
         
$ in millions 2009 2008
Accruals and other liabilities  115.2   134.0 
Compensation and benefits  45.1   59.1 
Accrued bonus and deferred compensation  239.2   275.0 
Accounts payable  148.1   150.2 
Other  17.1   21.5 
         
Other current liabilities  564.7   639.8 
         
The table below details the components of other current liabilities:
         
$ in millions 2010 2009
Accruals and other liabilities  182.5   110.4 
Compensation and benefits  36.4   45.1 
Accrued bonus and deferred compensation  365.3   239.2 
Accounts payable  302.5   148.1 
Other  19.0   17.1 
         
Other current liabilities  905.7   559.9 
         
9. DEBT
                 
  December 31, 2009 December 31, 2008
  Carrying     Carrying  
$ in millions Value Fair Value Value Fair Value
Unsecured Senior Notes*:                
4.5% — due December 15, 2009        297.2   277.3 
5.625% — due April 17, 2012  215.1   227.0   300.0   231.0 
5.375% — due February 27, 2013  333.5   343.4   350.0   299.5 
5.375% — due December 15, 2014  197.1   195.1   200.0   168.7 
Floating rate credit facility terminated on June 9, 2009        12.0   12.0 
Floating rate credit facility expiring June 9, 2012            
                 
Total debt  745.7   765.5   1,159.2   988.5 
Less: current maturities of total debt        297.2   277.3 
                 
Long-term debt  745.7   765.5   862.0   711.2 
                 
     The disclosures below include details of the company’s debt. Debt of consolidated investment products is detailed in Note 20, “Consolidated Investment Products.”
                 
  December 31, 2010 December 31, 2009
  Carrying     Carrying  
$ in millions Value Fair Value Value Fair Value
Unsecured Senior Notes*:                
5.625% — due April 17, 2012  215.1   223.7   215.1   227.0 
5.375% — due February 27, 2013  333.5   335.2   333.5   343.4 
5.375% — due December 15, 2014  197.1   210.4   197.1   195.1 
Floating rate credit facility terminated May 24, 2010            
Floating rate credit facility expiring May 23, 2013  570.0   570.0       
                 
Total debt  1,315.7   1,339.3   745.7   765.5 
Less: current maturities of total debt            
                 
Long-term debt  1,315.7   1,339.3   745.7   765.5 
                 
 
* The company’s Senior Note indentures contain certain restrictions on mergers or consolidations. Beyond these items, there are no other restrictive covenants in the indentures.
Analysis of Borrowings by Maturity:
     
$ in millions December 31, 2009
2010   
2011   
2012  215.1 
2013  333.5 
Thereafter  197.1 
     
Total debt  745.7 
     

88


     On June 2, 2009, the company commenced a tender offer for the maximum aggregate principal amount of the outstanding 5.625% senior notes due 2012, the 5.375% senior notes due 2013, and the 5.375% senior notes due 2014 (collectively, the “Notes”) that it could purchase for $100.0 million at a purchase price per $1,000 principal amount determined in accordance with the procedures of a modified “Dutch Auction” (tender offer). The tender offer expired at midnight on June 29, 2009, and on June 30, 2009, $104.3 million of the Notes had been retired, generating a gross gain of $4.3 million upon the retirement of debt at a discount ($3.3 million net of related expenses and the write-off of remaining unamortized debt discount costs), which was recorded in other gains and losses, net, in the Consolidated Statement of Income in the year ended December 31, 2009.
The fair market value of the company’s total debtSenior Notes was determined by market quotes provided by Bloomberg. In the absence of an active market, the company relies upon the average price quoted by brokers for determining the fair market value of the debt. The level of trading, both in number of trades and amount of Senior Notes traded, has increased to a level that the company believes market quotes to be a reasonable representation of the current fair market value of the Senior Notes. Due to the short-term nature of the credit facility and the variable interest rate, the fair value of the outstanding balance approximates its carrying value.

113


Analysis of Borrowings by Maturity:
     
$ in millions December 31, 2010
2011   
2012  215.1 
2013  903.5 
2014  197.1 
Thereafter   
     
Total debt  1,315.7 
     
     On June 9, 2009,May 24, 2010, the company completed a new three-yearterminated its existing $500.0 million revolving bank credit facility. The new credit facility replaced the $900.0 million credit facility that was scheduled to expire on March 31, 2010, but was terminated concurrent with the entryand entered into thea new $1,250.0 million credit facility. No early termination fees were incurred, and at the time of the termination, there were no loans outstanding under the prior credit facility.
Amounts borrowed under the new credit facility are repayable at maturity on June 9, 2012, provided that such maturity date will automatically be accelerated to March 16, 2012, if 90% or more of the $300.0 million face amount of the company’s 5.625% senior notes due 2012, are not repaid, repurchased or defeased prior to March 16, 2012. Subject to certain conditions, the company has the right to increase the aggregate borrowings under the new credit facility up to $750.0 million.May 23, 2013.
     At December 31, 2009, there was no2010, the outstanding balance on the new credit facility expiring June 9, 2012.was $570.0 million and the weighted average interest rate on the credit facility was 1.371%. Borrowings under the new credit facility will bear interest at (i) LIBOR for specified interest periods or (ii) a floating base rate (based upon the highest of (a) the Bank of America prime rate, (b) the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50% and (c) LIBOR for an interest period of one month plus 1.00%), plus, in either case, an applicable margin determined with reference to the company’s credit ratings and specified credit default spreads. Based on credit ratings as of December 31, 2009,2010 of the company and such credit default spreads, the applicable margin for LIBOR-based loans was 1.50%1.075% and for base rate loans was 0.50%0.075%. In addition, the company is required to pay the lenders a facility fee on the aggregate commitments of the lenders (whether or not used) at a rate per annum which is based on the company’s credit ratings. Based on credit ratings as of December 31, 2009,2010, the annual facility fee was equal to 0.50%0.30%.
     The credit agreement governing the new credit facility contains customary restrictive covenants on the company and its subsidiaries. Restrictive covenants in the credit agreement include, but are not limited to: prohibitions on creating, incurring or assuming any liens; making or holding external loans; entering into certain restrictive merger arrangements; selling, leasing, transferring or otherwise disposing of assets; making certain investments; making a material change in the nature of the business; making material amendments to organic documents; making a significant accounting policy change in certain situations; making or entering into restrictive agreements; becoming a general partner to certain investments; entering into transactions with affiliates; incurring certain indebtedness through the non-guarantor subsidiaries; and making certain restricted payments (with respect to equity and debt holders).subsidiaries. Many of these restrictions are subject to certain minimum thresholds and exceptions. Financial covenants under the credit agreement include: (i) the quarterly maintenance of a debt/EBITDA ratio, as defined in the credit agreement, of not greater than 3.25:1.00 through December 31, 2010,2011, and not greater than 3.00:1.00 thereafter, (ii) a coverage ratio (EBITDA, as defined in the credit agreement/interest payable for the four consecutive fiscal quarters ended before the date of determination) of not less than 4.00:1.00, and (iii) maintenance on a monthly basis of consolidated long-term assets under management (as defined in the credit agreement) of not less than $194.8 billion, which amount is subject to a one-time reset by the company under certain conditions.1.00.
     The credit agreement governing the new credit facility also contains customary provisions regarding events of default which could result in an acceleration or increase in amounts due, including (subject to certain materiality thresholds and grace periods) payment default, failure to comply with covenants, material inaccuracy of representation or warranty, bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings, change of control, certain judgments, ERISA matters, cross-default to other debt agreements, governmental action prohibiting or restricting the company or its subsidiaries in a manner that has a material adverse effect and failure of certain guaranty obligations.
     The lenders (and their respective affiliates) may have provided, and may in the future provide, investment banking, cash management, underwriting, lending, commercial banking, leasing, foreign exchange, trust or other advisory services to the company and its subsidiaries and affiliates. These parties may have received, and may in the future receive, customary compensation for these services.

89


     On December 15, 2009, the company repaid $294.2 million of 4.5% senior notes.
     The company maintains approximately $44.4$35.5 million in letters of credit from a variety of banks. The letters of credit are generally one-year automatically-renewable facilities and are maintained for various commercial reasons. Approximately $21.1$19.5 million of the letters of credit support office lease obligations.obligations, and $12.2 million supports the Canada Revenue Authority assessments discussed in Note 19, “Commitments and Contingencies.”

114


10. SHARE CAPITAL
     Movements in the number of common shares issued and outstandingcommon share equivalents issued are represented in the table below:
             
  Common Ordinary Exchangeable
  Shares Shares Shares
In millions
            
Shares issued — January 1, 2007     831.9   19.8 
Exercises of options     15.0    
Business combinations     0.6    
Conversion of exchangeable shares into ordinary shares     19.8   (19.8)
Cancellation of ordinary shares held in treasury shares     (19.4)   
Cancellation of ordinary shares and issuance of common shares  847.9   (847.9)   
One-for-two share capital consolidation  (423.9)      
             
Shares issued — December 4, 2007  424.0       
             
Exercise of options  0.7       
             
Shares issued — December 31, 2007  424.7       
             
Exercise of options  1.9       
             
Shares issued — December 31, 2008  426.6       
             
Issuance of new shares  32.9       
             
Shares issued — December 31, 2009
  459.5       
             
Less: Treasury shares for which dividend and voting rights do not apply  (28.1)      
             
Shares outstanding — December 31, 2009
  431.4       
             
             
  Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended
In millions December 31, 2010 December 31, 2009 December 31, 2008
Common shares issued — beginning balance  459.5   426.6   424.7 
Issue of new shares  30.9   32.9   1.9 
             
Common shares issued — ending balance  490.4   459.5   426.6 
Less: Treasury shares for which dividend and voting rights do not apply  (30.3)  (28.1)  (40.7)
             
Common shares outstanding  460.1   431.4   385.9 
             
Common Shares of Invesco Ltd.
     On December 4, 2007, INVESCO PLC became a wholly-owned subsidiaryJune 1, 2010, Invesco acquired Morgan Stanley’s retail asset management business, including Van Kampen Investments. In connection with this transaction, Invesco issued to Morgan Stanley 19,212 shares of Invesco Ltd. and the shareholders of INVESCO PLC receivedSeries A convertible participating preferred stock (“participating preferred shares”). Each participating preferred share was convertible into 1,000 common shares of Invesco Ltd. in exchange for their ordinary shares of INVESCO PLC. The primary listing of sharesupon transfer of the company moved from the London Stock Exchangeshares by Morgan Stanley to the New York Stock Exchange. This transaction was accounted foran unrelated third party. Each participating preferred share participated in a manner similar to a pooling of interests. A share capital consolidation, also known as a reverse stock split,dividends on a one-for-two basis was immediately effected. Share amountsequal to common shares. The participating preferred shares were non-voting except as otherwise provided by applicable law and prices have been retroactively restatedbenefit from a liquidation preference of $0.01 per share. In November 2010, Morgan Stanley sold its 30.9 million shares, as converted, to reflectunrelated third parties, resulting in the reverse stock split, where appropriate.conversion of the participating preferred shares outstanding into common shares outstanding.
     On May 26, 2009, the company issued 32.9 million shares in a public offering that produced gross proceeds of $460.5 million ($441.8 million net of related expenses).
Exchangeable Shares
     The exchangeable shares issued by INVESCO Inc., a subsidiary of the company, were exchangeable into ordinary shares of INVESCO PLC on a one-for-one basis at any time at the request of the holder. They had, as nearly as practicable, the economic equivalence of the ordinary shares of INVESCO PLC, including the same voting and dividend rights as the ordinary shares. Prior to the December 4, 2007, share capital reorganization, all of the company’s exchangeable shares were redeemed in accordance with their terms, and each holder of INVESCO Inc. exchangeable shares received one INVESCO PLC ordinary share. Prior to their redemption, the exchangeable shares were included as part of shareholders’ equity in the Consolidated Balance Sheet to present a complete view of the company’s capital structure, as they were economically equivalent to ordinary shares.

90


Treasury Shares
     On April 23, 2008, the board of directors authorized a new share repurchase program of up to $1.5 billion with no stated expiration date.     During the year ended December 31, 2009, there were no purchases under this program (December 31, 2008: 5.52010, the company repurchased 9.4 million common shares purchased under this programin the market at a cost of $139.4$192.2 million and 6.1 million(2009: no shares purchased under the prior share repurchase plan at a cost of $154.5 million)were repurchased). Separately, an aggregate of 1.61.9 million shares were withheld on vesting events during the year ended December 31, 2009,2010 to meet employees’ withholding tax obligations (December 31, 2008: 0.3 million)(2009: 1.6 million shares). The carrying value of these shares withheld was $47.9 million (2009: $22.9 million (December 31, 2008: $4.6 million).
     On June 13, 2007, Approximately $1.2 billion remained authorized under the company’s board of directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to $500.0 million of the ordinary shares of INVESCO PLC. The share repurchase authorization was fully utilized by March 2008. Through December 4, 2007, 19.4 million ordinary shares had been repurchasedplan at a cost of $253.3 million, which was reflected as an increase in Treasury Shares on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. On November 30, 2007, 19.4 million Treasury Shares were cancelled. Between December 4 and 31, 2007, 3.5 million common shares of Invesco Ltd. were purchased at a cost of $99.6 million, reflected as Treasury Shares on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Of the total share repurchase program amount authorized, $154.5 million remained as of December 31, 2007. The share purchases in December 2007 included 0.3 million common shares at a cost of $7.4 million from current executive officers of the company that have not been included in arriving at the remaining authorized amount.2010 (2009: $1.4 billion).
     Treasury shares include shares held related to certain employee share-based payment programs. These shares include shares previously held in the Invesco Employee Share Option Trust and the Invesco Global Stock Plan Trust. The Invesco Global Stock Plan Trust was terminated in December 2008, and at December 31, 2009, the Invesco Employee Share Option Trust held no company shares. The shares formerly held by both the Invesco Global Stock Plan Trust and the Invesco Employee Share Option Trust are now held by the company, the transfers having no accounting implications for the company. These shares are accounted for under the treasury stock method.
     TheThere were no waived dividends for the trustees of the Employee Share Option Trust waived dividends amounting toin 2010 (2009: $3.9 million in 2009 (2008:million; 2008: $5.0 million; 2007: $3.6 million). As the Global Stock Plan Trust was terminated in December 2008, there were no waived dividends for this Trust in 2010 and 2009 (2008: $4.5 million; 2007: $1.5 million).
     Movements in Treasury Shares comprise:
Treasury
In millionsShares
January 1, 200766.0
Acquisition of ordinary shares45.9
Dividend shares0.5
Distribution of ordinary shares(3.1)
Cancellation of ordinary shares held in Treasury(19.4)
One-for-two share capital consolidation(44.9)
December 4, 200745.0
Acquisition of common shares3.5
Distribution of common shares(2.9)
December 31, 200745.6
Acquisition of common shares12.6
Distribution of common shares(4.4)
Common shares distributed to meet option exercises(3.1)
December 31, 200850.7
Acquisition of common shares1.6
Distribution of common shares(7.5)
Common shares distributed to meet option exercises(4.6)
             
  Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended
In millions December 31, 2010 December 31, 2009 December 31, 2008
Beginning balance  40.2   50.7   45.6 
Acquisition of common shares  11.3   1.6   12.6 
Distribution of common shares  (7.0)  (7.5)  (4.4)
Common shares distributed to meet option exercises  (1.8)  (4.6)  (3.1)
             
Ending balance  42.7   40.2   50.7 
             

115


December 31, 2009
40.2
     Total treasury shares at December 31, 2009,2010 were 42.7 million (2009: 40.2 million,million), including 12.112.4 million unvested restricted sharestock awards (2009: 12.1 million) for which dividend and voting rights apply. The market price of common shares at the end of 20092010 was $23.49.$24.06. The total market value of the company’s 40.242.7 million treasury shares was $944.3$1,027.4 million on December 31, 2009.2010.

91


11. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS)
     The components of accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) at December 31 were as follows:
                        
$ in millions 2009 2008 2007 2010 2009 2008
Net unrealized gains/(losses) on available-for-sale investments 5.4  (7.7) 1.6  10.1 5.4  (7.7)
Tax on unrealized gains/(losses) on available-for-sale investments  (1.6) 0.1  (2.2)  (2.4)  (1.6) 0.1 
Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) of equity method investments 2.9   
Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments 442.0  (46.3) 987.9  524.6 442.0  (46.3)
Tax on cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments 2.0 1.3 6.3  2.0 2.0 1.3 
Employee benefit plan liability adjustments  (74.5)  (59.4)  (59.1)  (55.8)  (74.5)  (59.4)
Tax on employee benefit plan liability adjustments 20.3 16.2 17.6  14.1 20.3 16.2 
              
Total accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) 393.6  (95.8) 952.1  495.5 393.6  (95.8)
              
Total other comprehensive income/(loss) details are presented below.
             
$ in millions 2009 2008 2007
Net income, including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests  209.3   421.0   886.5 
Adoption of ASC Topic 320-10-65  (1.5)      
Unrealized holding gains and losses on available-for-sale investments  10.6   (33.3)  1.0 
Tax on unrealized holding gains and losses on available-for-sale investments  (2.8)  3.2   0.2 
Reclassification adjustments for net gains and losses on available-for-sale investments included in net income  4.0   24.0   (17.8)
Tax on reclassification adjustments for gains (losses) on available-for-sale investments included in net income  1.1   (0.9)  0.2 
Foreign currency translation adjustments  488.3   (1,034.2)  351.1 
Tax on foreign currency translation adjustments  0.7   (5.0)  (1.7)
Adjustments to employee benefit plan liability  (15.1)  (0.3)  7.7 
Tax on adjustments to employee benefit plan liability  4.1   (1.4)  (3.1)
             
Total other comprehensive income/(loss)  698.7   (626.9)  1,224.1 
             
12. GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
     The company operates under one business segment, investment management. Geographical information is presented below. There are no revenues or long-lived assets attributed to the company’s country of domicile, Bermuda.
                         
$ in millions U.S. U.K./Ireland Canada Europe Asia Total
2009
                        
Operating revenues  1,131.6   1,037.9   353.1   42.8   61.9   2,627.3 
Inter-company  11.0   (103.7)  (8.8)  43.4   58.1    
                         
   1,142.6   934.2   344.3   86.2   120.0   2,627.3 
                         
Long-lived assets  127.2   75.0   7.7   3.1   7.7   220.7 
2008
                        
Operating revenues  1,427.8   1,231.7   516.6   58.9   72.6   3,307.6 
Inter-company  24.4   (143.4)  (16.1)  59.5   75.6    
                         
   1,452.2   1,088.3   500.5   118.4   148.2   3,307.6 
                         
Long-lived assets  125.9   61.9   8.1   0.9   8.5   205.3 
2007
                        
Operating revenues  1,529.0   1,478.0   697.3   71.2   103.4   3,878.9 
Inter-company  38.6   (156.9)  (22.0)  75.0   65.3    
                         
   1,567.6   1,321.1   675.3   146.2   168.7   3,878.9 
                         
Long-lived assets  79.7   81.1   8.4   1.4   9.4   180.0 
     Operating revenues reflect the geographical regions from which services are provided.

92


13. OTHER GAINS AND LOSSES, NET
             
$ in millions 2009 2008 2007
Other gains:
            
Gain on sale of investments  5.9   10.7   32.2 
Gain on sale of business        1.6 
Net foreign exchange gains  8.4       
Net gain generated upon debt tender offer  3.3       
             
Total other gains  17.6   10.7   33.8 
             
Other losses:
            
Other-than-temporary impairment of available-for-sale investments  (8.2)  (31.2)  (5.4)
Losses incurred on fund liquidations        (8.2)
Net foreign exchange losses     (13.0)  (10.3)
Other realized losses  (1.6)  (6.4)   
             
Total other losses  (9.8)  (50.6)  (23.9)
             
Other gains and losses, net  7.8   (39.9)  9.9 
             
14. TAXATION
     The company’s (provision)\benefit for income taxes is summarized as follows:
             
$ in millions 2009 2008 2007
Current:
            
Federal  (6.7)  (41.4)  (107.4)
State  (1.4)  (6.9)  (9.0)
Foreign  (130.3)  (156.0)  (260.6)
             
   (138.4)  (204.3)  (377.0)
             
Deferred:
            
Federal  (9.2)  (31.9)  25.1 
State  (0.6)  0.1   2.5 
Foreign     0.1   (7.9)
             
   (9.8)  (31.7)  19.7 
             
Total income tax (provision)/benefit  (148.2)  (236.0)  (357.3)
             
     The net deferred tax recognized in our balance sheet at December 31 includes the following:
         
$ in millions 2009 2008
Deferred Tax Assets:
        
Deferred compensation arrangements  89.6   104.1 
Expenses for vacating leased property  18.8   23.3 
Tax loss carryforwards  74.3   52.4 
Excess underlying foreign tax credit     102.9 
Postretirement medical, pension and other benefits  29.6   29.9 
Investment basis differences  23.0   17.5 
Other  19.5   16.1 
         
Total Deferred Tax Assets
  254.8   346.2 
Valuation Allowance
  (73.2)  (154.3)
         
Deferred Tax Assets, net of valuation allowance
  181.6   191.9 
         
Deferred Tax Liabilities:
        
Deferred sales commissions  (12.3)  (12.9)
Intangible asset amortization  (30.7)  (26.9)
Undistributed earnings of subsidiaries  (2.3)  (8.9)
Revaluation reserve  (5.2)  (4.7)
Other  (7.6)  (15.2)
         
Total Deferred Tax Liabilities
  (58.1)  (68.6)
         
Net Deferred Tax Assets
  123.5   123.3 
         

93


     A reconciliation between the statutory rate and the effective tax rate on income from operations for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 is as follows:
             
  2009 2008 2007
Statutory Rate  35.0%  35.0%  35.0%
Foreign jurisdiction statutory income tax rates  (7.4)%  (4.7)%  (4.6)%
State taxes, net of federal tax effect  1.4%  0.5%  0.9%
Additional tax on unremitted earnings  0.2%  (0.2)%  1.1%
Change in valuation allowance for unrecognized tax losses  4.2%  2.0%  0.8%
Non-deductible expenses related to relisting/redomicile        0.4%
Other  (1.9%)  0.3%  1.0%
             
Effective tax rate (excluding noncontrolling interests)  31.5%  32.9%  34.6%
Gains/(losses) attributable to noncontrolling interests  10.0%  3.0%  (5.9)%
             
Effective tax rate per Consolidated Statements of Income  41.5%  35.9%  28.7%
             
     The company’s subsidiaries operate in several taxing jurisdictions around the world, each with its own statutory income tax rate. As a result, the blended average statutory tax rate will vary from year to year depending on the mix of the profits and losses of the company’s subsidiaries. The majority of our profits are earned in the U.S., Canada and the U.K. The current U.K. statutory tax rate is 28%, the Canadian statutory tax rate is 33% and the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate is 35%.
     On December 14, 2007, legislation was enacted to reduce the Canadian income tax rate over five years, which changed the rate to 33.5% in 2008 and 33.0% in 2009. The legislation was revised in December 2009, further reducing the rate to 31.0% in 2010, 28.25% in 2011, and 26.25% in 2012. The reduction in our Canadian deferred tax assets as a result of these rate changes increased our 2009 effective tax rate by 0.1% and is included in “Other” above.
     At December 31, 2009, the company had tax loss carryforwards accumulated in certain taxing jurisdictions in the aggregate of $222.5 million (2008: $165.0 million), approximately $18.5 million of which expire between 2010 and 2015, with the remaining $204.0 million having an indefinite life. A full valuation allowance has been recorded against the deferred tax assets related to these losses based on a history of losses in these taxing jurisdictions which make it unlikely that the deferred tax assets will be realized. As a result of a UK legislative change, effective July 1, 2009, we anticipate that future dividends paid to the UK from non-UK subsidiaries will meet one of the new classes of exemption and thus will not be subject to further UK tax. Since we anticipate that future dividends will be exempt we will no longer be able to utilize our excess underlying foreign tax credits of $102.9 million in 2008 (2007: $68.0 million) which had been recorded as a deferred tax asset with a full valuation allowance. We have removed both the deferred tax asset and the associated valuation allowance which had no impact to the Consolidated Statements of Income.
     As a multinational corporation, the company operates in various locations around the world and we generate substantially all of our earnings from our subsidiaries. Under ASC 740-30 deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxes that would be payable on the unremitted earnings of the company’s subsidiaries, consolidated investment products, and joint ventures, except where it is our intention to continue to indefinitely reinvest the undistributed earnings. Our Canadian and U.S. subsidiaries continue to be directly owned by Invesco Holding Company Limited (formerly INVESCO PLC, our predecessor company), which is directly owned by Invesco Ltd. Our Canadian unremitted earnings, for which we are indefinitely reinvested, are estimated to be $1,016 million at December 31, 2009, compared with $953 million at December 31, 2008. If distributed as a dividend, Canadian withholding tax of 5.0% would be due. Dividends from our investment in the U.S. should not give rise to additional tax as we are not subject to withholding tax between the U.S. and U.K. Deferred tax liabilities in the amount of $2.3 million (2008: $8.9 million) for additional tax have been recognized for unremitted earnings of certain subsidiaries that have regularly remitted earnings and are expected to continue to remit earnings in the foreseeable future. The UK dividend exemption law change discussed above should apply to the remainder of our UK subsidiary investments. There is no additional tax on dividends from the U.K. to Bermuda.
     The company and its subsidiaries file annual income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various U.S. state and local jurisdictions, and in numerous foreign jurisdictions. A number of years may elapse before an uncertain tax position, for which the company has unrecognized tax benefits, is finally resolved. To the extent that the company has favorable tax settlements, or determines that accrued amounts are no longer needed due to a lapse in the applicable statute of limitations or other change in circumstances, such liabilities, as well as the related interest and penalty, would be reversed as a reduction of income tax expense (net of federal tax effects, if applicable) in the period such determination is made. At January 1, 2009, the company had approximately $55.9 million of gross unrecognized income tax benefits (UTBs). Of this total, $22.6 million (net of tax benefits in other jurisdictions

94


and the federal benefit of state taxes) represents the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would favorably affect the effective tax rate in future periods. A reconciliation of the change in the UTB balance from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2009, is as follows:
Gross Unrecognized
$ in millionsIncome Tax Benefits
Balance at January 1, 200768.5
Additions for tax positions related to the current year8.6
Additions for tax positions related to prior years
Other reductions for tax positions related to prior years(4.2)
Settlements(3.9)
Balance at December 31, 200769.0
Additions for tax positions related to the current year5.1
Additions for tax positions related to prior years(0.2)
Other reductions for tax positions related to prior years(6.1)
Settlements(11.9)
Balance at December 31, 200855.9
Additions for tax positions related to the current year0.3
Additions for tax positions related to prior years4.1
Other reductions for tax positions related to prior years(6.0)
Reductions for statute closings(15.3)
Balance at December 31, 2009
39.0
     The company recognizes accrued interest and penalties, as appropriate, related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of the income tax provision. At December 31, 2009, the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits was $39.0 million. Of this total, $20.4 million (net of tax benefits in other jurisdictions and the federal benefit of state taxes) represents the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would favorably affect the effective tax rate in future periods. The Consolidated Balance Sheet includes accrued interest and penalties of $13.3 million at December 31, 2009, reflecting $11.1 million of tax benefit realized in 2009. As a result of the expiration of statutes of limitations for various jurisdictions and anticipated legislative changes, it is reasonably possible that the company’s gross unrecognized tax benefits balance may change within the next twelve months by a range of zero to $15.0 million. The company and its subsidiaries are periodically examined by various taxing authorities. With few exceptions, the company is no longer subject to income tax examinations by the primary tax authorities for years prior to 2003. Management monitors changes in tax statutes and regulations and the issuance of judicial decisions to determine the potential impact to uncertain income tax positions. As of December 31, 2009, management had identified no other potential subsequent events that could have a significant impact on the unrecognized tax benefits balance.

95


15. EARNINGS PER SHARE
     The calculation of earnings per share is as follows:
             
  Net Income       
  Attributable to       
  Common  Weighted Average  Per Share 
$ in millions, except per share data Shareholders  Number of Shares*  Amount* 
2009
            
Basic earnings per share $322.5   417.2  $0.77 
Dilutive effect of share-based awards     6.4    
          
Diluted earnings per share $322.5   423.6  $0.76 
          
2008
            
Basic earnings per share $481.7   388.7  $1.24 
Dilutive effect of share-based awards     10.4    
          
Diluted earnings per share $481.7   399.1  $1.21 
          
2007
            
Basic earnings per share $673.6   400.0  $1.68 
Dilutive effect of share-based awards     11.9    
          
Diluted earnings per share $673.6   411.9  $1.64 
          
*The basic weighted average number of shares for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, was restated upon the adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1, now encompassed in ASC Topic 260, “Earnings Per Share,” as discussed in Note 1. The adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1 resulted in a change to the reported basic earnings per share amount of $0.01 and $0.01 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1 did not impact diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2008 or 2007.
     See Note 17, “Share Based Compensation,” for a summary of share awards outstanding under the company’s share-based payment programs. These programs could result in the issuance of common shares that would affect the measurement of basic and diluted earnings per share.
     Options to purchase 9.6 million common shares at a weighted average exercise price of 2,030 pence were outstanding during the year ended December 31, 2009 (2008: 13.7 million share options at a weighted average exercise price of 1,886 pence; 2007: 15.5 million share options at a weighted average exercise price of 1,886 pence), but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the option’s exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares and therefore their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.
     There were no time-vested share awards that were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share during the year ended December 31, 2009, due to their inclusion being anti-dilutive. The company excluded 1.6 million contingently issuable shares from the diluted earnings per share computation for the year ended December 31, 2009, because the necessary performance conditions for the shares are not expected to be met in future years. There were no time-vested share awards or contingently issuable shares (including performance-vested share awards) that were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 due to their inclusion being anti-dilutive.
16. CONSOLIDATED INVESTMENT PRODUCTS
     The company provides investment management services to, and has transactions with, various private equity, real estate, fund-of-funds, CLOs and other investment entities sponsored by the company for the investment of client assets in the normal course of business. The company serves as the investment manager, making day-to-day investment decisions concerning the assets of the products. Certain of these investments are considered to be variable interest entities (VIEs). If the company is the primary beneficiary of the VIEs, then the investment products are consolidated into the company’s financial statements. Other partnership entities are consolidated under a voting interest entity (VOE) model where the company is the general partner and is presumed to have control, in the absence of simple majority kick-out rights to remove the general partner, simple majority liquidation rights to dissolve the partnership, or any substantive participating rights of the other limited partners.

96


     For investment products that are structured as partnerships and are determined to be VIEs, including private equity, real estate and fund-of-funds products, the company evaluates the structure of the partnership to determine if it is the primary beneficiary of the investment product. This evaluation includes assessing the rights of the limited partners to transfer their economic interests in the investment product. If the limited partners lack objective rights to transfer their economic interests, they are considered to be de facto agents of the company, resulting in the company determining that it is the primary beneficiary of the investment product. The company generally takes less than a 1% investment in these entities as the general partner. Interests in unconsolidated private equity, real estate and fund-of-funds products are classified as equity method investments in the company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The company’s risk with respect to each investment is limited to its equity ownership and any uncollected management fees. Therefore, gains or losses of consolidated investment products have not had a significant impact on the company’s results of operations, liquidity or capital resources. The company has no right to the benefits from, nor does it bear the risks associated with, these investments, beyond the company’s minimal direct investments in, and management fees generated from, the investment products. If the company were to liquidate, these investments would not be available to the general creditors of the company, and as a result, the company does not consider investments held by consolidated investment products to be company assets.
     For CLO entities, as discussed in Note 2, “Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities,” the company generally takes only a relatively small portion of the unrated, junior subordinated positions. The company’s investments in CLOs are generally subordinated to other interests in the entities and entitle the investors to receive the residual cash flows, if any, from the entities. Investors in CLOs have no recourse against the company for any losses sustained in the CLO structure. The company’s ownership interests, which are classified as available-for-sale investments on the company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets, combined with its other interests (management and incentive fees), are quantitatively assessed to determine if the company is the primary beneficiary of these entities. The company determined that it did not absorb the majority of the expected gains or losses from the CLOs and therefore is not their primary beneficiary. The company’s equity interest in the CLOs of $17.9 million at December 31, 2009 (December 31, 2008: $17.5 million), represents its maximum risk of loss.
     As discussed in Note 20, “Commitments and Contingencies,” the company has entered into contingent support agreements for two of its investment trusts to enable them to sustain a stable pricing structure, creating variable interests in these VIEs. The company earns management fees from the trusts and has a small investment in one of these trusts. The company was not deemed to be the primary beneficiary of these trusts after considering any explicit and implicit variable interests in relation to the total expected gains and losses of the trusts. The maximum committed amount under the support agreements, which represents the company’s maximum risk of loss, is equivalent to the amount of support that the trusts required as of December 31, 2009, to maintain the net asset value of the trusts at $1.00 per share. The recorded fair value of the guarantees related to these agreements at December 31, 2009, was estimated to be $2.5 million (December 31, 2008: $5.5 million), which was recorded as a guarantee obligation in other current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The fair value of these agreements is lower than the maximum support amount reflecting management’s estimation that the likelihood of funding under the support agreement is low, as significant investor redemptions out of the trusts before the scheduled maturity of the underlying securities or significant credit default issues of the securities held within the trusts’ portfolios would be required to trigger funding by the company.
     In June 2009, the company invested in the initial public offering of Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (NYSE: IVR), a real estate investment trust which is managed by the company. The company purchased 75,000 common shares of IVR at $20.00 per share and 1,425,000 limited partner units at $20.00 per unit through private placements for a total of $30.0 million. The company determined that IVR is a VIE and that its investment represents a variable interest. The company’s ownership interests, which are classified as equity method investments on the company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets, combined with its other interests (management fees), were quantitatively assessed to determine if the company is the primary beneficiary of IVR. The company determined that it did not absorb the majority of the expected gains or losses from IVR and therefore is not its primary beneficiary.
     On July 8, 2009, the U.S. Treasury announced the launch of the Public-Private Investment Program (PPIP), which was designed to support market functioning and facilitate price discovery in the asset-based securities markets, to allow banks and other financial institutions to re-deploy capital, and to extend new credit to households and businesses. Under this program, the U.S. Treasury will invest up to $30.0 billion of equity and debt into funds established with private sector investment managers and private investors for the purpose of purchasing legacy securities. The U.S. Treasury has partnered with eight investment management firms, including Invesco, in the PPIP. The company determined that certain feeder funds within the Invesco-sponsored PPIP partnership structure are VIEs; however, the company is not their primary beneficiary, as it does not absorb the majority of the expected gains or losses from these funds. Additionally, the company does not have any capital invested or committed into these funds. Other funds within the PPIP structure are VOEs; however, the company as general partner is not deemed to control these entities due to the presence of substantive kick-out or liquidation rights.

97


     At December 31, 2009, the company’s maximum risk of loss in significant VIEs in which the company is not the primary beneficiary is presented in the table below.
         
      Company’s Maximum
$ in millions Carrying Value Risk of Loss
CLOs  17.9   17.9 
Partnership and trust investments  16.1   16.1 
Investments in IVR  30.0   30.0 
Support agreements* (See Note 20)  (2.5)  51.0 
         
Total      115.0 
         
*As of December 31, 2009, the committed support under these agreements was $51.0 million with an internal approval mechanism to increase the maximum possible support to $66.0 million at the option of the company.
     The following tables reflect the impact of consolidation at fair value of investment products into the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009, and 2008 and the Consolidated Statements of Income for the periods ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
Balance Sheets
                     
      Variable Voting    
  Before Interest Interest    
$ in millions Consolidation* Entities Entities Eliminations Total
As of December 31, 2009
                    
Current assets  3,089.8   4.2   27.0      3,121.0 
Non-current assets  7,111.8   67.9   617.1   (8.2)  7,788.6 
                     
Total assets  10,201.6   72.1   644.1   (8.2)  10,909.6 
                     
Current liabilities  2,293.6   0.7   4.1      2,298.4 
Non-current liabilities  990.4            990.4 
                     
Total liabilities  3,284.0   0.7   4.1      3,288.8 
                     
Total equity attributable to common shareholders  6,912.9   0.2   8.0   (8.2)  6,912.9 
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities  4.7   71.2   632.0      707.9 
                     
Total liabilities and equity  10,201.6   72.1   644.1   (8.2)  10,909.6 
                     
                     
      Variable Voting    
  Before Interest Interest    
$ in millions Consolidation* Entities Entities Eliminations Total
As of December 31, 2008
                    
Current assets  2,296.8   13.6   64.1   (0.5)  2,374.0 
Non-current assets  6,555.4   141.9   701.9   (16.3)  7,382.9 
                     
Total assets  8,852.2   155.5   766.0   (16.8)  9,756.9 
                     
Current liabilities  2,098.3   1.1   4.5   (0.5)  2,103.4 
Non-current liabilities  1,057.3            1,057.3 
                     
Total liabilities  3,155.6   1.1   4.5   (0.5)  3,160.7 
                     
Total equity attributable to common shareholders  5,689.5   0.9   15.4   (16.3)  5,689.5 
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities  7.1   153.5   746.1      906.7 
                     
Total liabilities and equity  8,852.2   155.5   766.0   (16.8)  9,756.9 
                     
*The Before Consolidation column includes Invesco’s equity interest in the investment products, accounted for under the equity method.

98


Statements of Income
                     
      Variable Voting    
  Before Interest Interest    
$ in millions Consolidation* Entities Entities Eliminations Total
Year ended December 31, 2009
                    
Total operating revenues  2,633.3   0.3   1.6   (7.9)  2,627.3 
Total operating expenses  (2,139.5)  (1.8)  (9.6)  7.9   (2,143.0)
                     
Operating income  493.8   (1.5)  (8.0)     484.3 
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates  24.5         2.5   27.0 
Interest income  9.8            9.8 
Other investment income/(losses)  7.8   (11.6)  (95.3)     (99.1)
Interest expense  (64.5)           (64.5)
                     
Income before income taxes, including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests  471.4   (13.1)  (103.3)  2.5   357.5 
Income tax provision  (148.2)           (148.2)
                     
Net income/(loss), including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests  323.2   (13.1)  (103.3)  2.5   209.3 
(Gains)/losses attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities, net  (0.7)  13.1   100.8      113.2 
                     
Net income attributable to common shareholders.  322.5      (2.5)  2.5   322.5 
                     
                     
      Variable Voting    
  Before Interest Interest    
$ in millions Consolidation* Entities Entities Eliminations Total
Year ended December 31, 2008
                    
Total operating revenues  3,308.4   0.3   5.2   (6.3)  3,307.6 
Total operating expenses  (2,555.3)  (1.5)  (9.3)  6.3   (2,559.8)
                     
Operating income  753.1   (1.2)  (4.1)     747.8 
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates  45.9         0.9   46.8 
Interest income  37.2            37.2 
Other investment income/(losses)  (39.9)  15.5   (73.5)     (97.9)
Interest expense  (76.9)           (76.9)
                     
Income before income taxes, including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests  719.4   14.3   (77.6)  0.9   657.0 
Income tax provision  (236.0)           (236.0)
                     
Net income/(loss), including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests  483.4   14.3   (77.6)  0.9   421.0 
(Gains)/losses attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities, net  (1.7)  (14.3)  76.7      60.7 
                     
Net income attributable to common shareholders.  481.7      (0.9)  0.9   481.7 
                     

99


                     
      Variable Voting    
  Before Interest Interest    
$ in millions Consolidation* Entities Entities Eliminations Total
Year ended December 31, 2007
                    
Total operating revenues  3,872.4   5.3   9.9   (8.7)  3,878.9 
Total operating expenses  (2,876.3)  (8.8)  (8.2)  8.7   (2,884.6)
                     
Operating income  996.1   (3.5)  1.7      994.3 
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates  52.2         (4.1)  48.1 
Interest income  48.5            48.5 
Other investment income/(losses)  9.9   202.7   11.6      224.2 
Interest expense  (71.3)           (71.3)
                     
Income before income taxes , including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests  1,035.4   199.2   13.3   (4.1)  1,243.8 
Income tax provision  (357.5)  0.2         (357.3)
                     
Net income, including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests  677.9   199.4   13.3   (4.1)  886.5 
(Gains)/losses attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities, net  (4.3)  (195.3)  (13.3)     (212.9)
                     
Net income attributable to common shareholders.  673.6   4.1      (4.1)  673.6 
                     
*The Before Consolidation column includes Invesco’s equity interest in the investment products, accounted for under the equity method.
     During the year ended December 31, 2009, the company deconsolidated $53.3 million of investments held by consolidated investment products and related noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities as a result of determining that the company is no longer the primary beneficiary. The amounts deconsolidated from the Consolidated Balance Sheet is illustrated in the table below. There was no net impact to the Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2009, from the deconsolidation of these investment products.
Balance Sheet
VIEs
$ in millionsdeconsolidated
Year ended December 31, 2009
Current assets
Non-current assets53.3
Total assets53.3
Current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Total liabilities
Total equity attributable to common shareholders
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities53.3
Total liabilities and equity53.3
     As a result of amendments made to limited partnership agreements of certain real estate partnerships in the six months ended June 30, 2008, the company determined that it no longer controlled certain real estate partnerships. Accordingly, amounts reflected in the VOEs deconsolidated column of the table below were deconsolidated effective April 1, 2008. Amendments were made to other limited partnership agreements to add objective transfer criteria, whereby the limited partners have the ability to transfer their economic interests in the funds to other investors without restrictive consent of the general partner. As a result of the addition of objective transfer criteria, a reconsideration event, the non-affiliated limited partner investors are now no longer deemed de facto agents of the general partner. Accordingly, amounts reflected in the VIEs deconsolidated column of the table below were deconsolidated effective April 1, 2008. This reconsideration event also triggered the consolidation at April 1, 2008, under the VOE consolidation model, of $148.1 million of net assets of consolidated investment products and $146.6 million of related noncontrolling

100


interests. There was no net impact to the Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2008, from the consolidation or deconsolidation of these investment products.
             
  VOEs VIEs VOEs
$ in millions consolidated* deconsolidated* deconsolidated
Year ended December 31, 2008
            
Current assets  5.4   0.4   2.4 
Non-current assets  142.8      398.0 
             
Total assets  148.2   0.4   400.4 
             
Current liabilities         
Non-current liabilities  0.1      136.2 
             
Total liabilities  0.1      136.2 
             
Equity attributable to common shareholders  1.5   0.4   8.1 
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities  146.6      256.1 
             
Total liabilities and equity  148.2   0.4   400.4 
             
             
$ in millions 2010 2009 2008
Net income, including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests  636.8   209.3   421.0 
Adoption of guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 320     (1.5)   
Unrealized holding gains and losses on available-for-sale investments*  11.5   10.6   (33.3)
Tax on unrealized holding gains and losses on available-for-sale investments  (2.7)  (2.8)  3.2 
Comprehensive income of equity method investments  2.9       
Reclassification adjustments for net (gains) and losses on available-for-sale investments included in net income  (1.6)  4.0   24.0 
Tax on reclassification adjustments for gains (losses) on available-for-sale investments included in net income  1.9   1.1   (0.9)
Foreign currency translation adjustments**  77.3   488.3   (1,034.2)
Tax on foreign currency translation adjustments     0.7   (5.0)
Adjustments to employee benefit plan liability  18.7   (15.1)  (0.3)
Tax on adjustments to employee benefit plan liability  (6.2)  4.1   (1.4)
             
Total other comprehensive income/(loss)  738.6   698.7   (626.9)
             
 
* The company changedadopted guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 810 on January 1, 2010, resulting in the basis of consolidation of $610.5certain CLOs. Upon adoption, accumulated other comprehensive income was reduced by $5.2 million, as accumulated net unrealized gains at January 1, 2010 relating to the company’s investments in certain CLOs were reclassified into retained earnings upon their consolidation.
**Included in this amount are net assetslosses of $5.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 related to foreign currency translation adjustments attributable to consolidated investment products andproducts. Such amounts form part of the related noncontrolling interest of $600.5 million effective April 1, 2008,company’s total comprehensive income but are reclassified from a VOE consolidation model to a VIE consolidation model, which is not reflectedaccumulated other comprehensive income into retained earnings appropriated for investors in these columns. This change did not impact our Consolidated Financial Statements, as the amounts were already being consolidated.consolidated investment products.

116


12. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
     The carrying value of investments held by consolidated investment products is also their fair value. The following table presents the fair value hierarchy levels of investments held by consolidated investment products,company issues equity-settled share-based awards to certain employees, which are measured at fair value asat the date of December 31, 2009:
                 
  As of December 31, 2009
      Quoted Prices in Significant  
      Active Markets Other Significant
  Fair Value for Identical Observable Unobservable
$ in millions Measurements Assets (Level 1) Inputs (Level 2) Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:                
Equity securities  117.2   7.0      110.2 
Investments in other private equity funds  556.9         556.9 
Debt securities issued by U.S. Treasury  10.9   10.9       
                 
Investments held by consolidated investment products  685.0   17.9      667.1 
                 
     The following table presents the fair value hierarchy levels of the carrying value of investments held by consolidated investment products, which are measured at fair value as of December 31, 2008:
                 
  As of December 31, 2008 
      Quoted Prices in  Significant    
      Active Markets  Other  Significant 
  Fair Value  for Identical  Observable  Unobservable 
$ in millions Measurements  Assets (Level 1)  Inputs (Level 2)  Inputs (Level 3) 
Assets:                
Investments held by consolidated investment products  843.8   82.8      761.0 

101


     The following table shows a reconciliation of the beginning and ending fair value measurements for level 3 assets using significant unobservable inputs:
Year ended
December 31,
$ in millions2009
Beginning balance761.0
Purchases and sales, net13.8
Gains and losses included in the Consolidated Statement of Income*(107.7)
Ending balance667.1
*Included in gains and losses in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2009, are $110.2 million in net unrealized losses attributable to investments held at December 31, 2009, by consolidated investment products.
     Consolidated investment products are generally structured as partnerships. Generally, the investment strategy of underlying holdingsgrant, in these partnerships is to seek capital appreciation through direct investments in public or private companiesaccordance with compelling business models or ideas or through investments in partnership investments that also invest in similar private or public companies. Various strategies may be used. Companies targeted could be distressed organizations, targets of leveraged buyouts or fledgling companies in need of venture capital. Investees of these consolidated investment products may not redeem their investment until the partnership liquidates. Generally, the partnerships have a life that range from seven to twelve years unless dissolved earlier. The general partner may extend the partnership term up to a specified period of time as stated in the Partnership Agreement. Some partnerships allow the limited partners to cause an earlier termination upon the occurrence of certain events as specified in the Partnership Agreement.
     For private equity partnerships, fair value is determined by reviewing each investment for the sale of additional securities of an issuer to sophisticated investors or for investee financial conditions and fundamentals. Publicly traded portfolio investments are carried at market value as determined by their most recent quoted sale, or if there is no recent sale, at their most recent bid price. For these investments held by consolidated investment products, level 1 classification indicates that fair values have been determined using unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets that the partnership has the ability to access. Level 2 classification may indicate that fair values have been determined using quoted prices in active markets but give effect to certain lock-up restrictions surrounding the holding period of the underlying investments.
ASC Topic 718, “Compensation — Stock Compensation.” The fair value of level 3 investments held by consolidated investment products are derived from inputs that are unobservable and which reflectdetermined at the limited partnerships’ own determinations about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the investments, including assumptions about risk. These inputs are developedgrant date is expensed, based on the partnership’s own data, whichcompany’s estimate of shares that will eventually vest, on a straight-line or accelerated basis over the vesting period. The initial forfeiture rate applied to most grants is adjusted if information indicates that5% per year, based upon the company’s historical experience with respect to employee turnover. Fair value for share awards representing equity interests identical to those associated with shares traded in the open market participants wouldis determined using the market price at the grant date. Fair value is measured by use different assumptions. The partnerships which invest directly into private equity portfolio companies (direct private equity funds) take into account various market conditions, subsequent rounds of financing, liquidity, financial condition, purchase multiples paid in other comparable third-party transactions, the price of securities of other companies comparable to the portfolio company, and operating results and other financial data of the portfolio company, as applicable.
     The partnerships which invest into other private equity funds (funds of funds) take into account information received from those underlying funds, including their reported net asset valuesBlack Scholes valuation model for certain share awards that do not include dividend rights, and evidence as to their fair value approach, including consistencywas measured by use of their fair value application. These investments do not trade in active markets and represent illiquid long-term investments that generally require future capital commitments. While the partnerships’ reporteda stochastic model (a lattice-based model) for share of the underlying net asset values of the underlying funds is usually the most significant input in arriving at fair value and is generally representative of fair value, other information may also be used to value such investments at a premium or discount to the net asset values as reported by the funds, including allocations of priority returns within the funds as well as any specific conditions and events affecting the funds.
     Unforeseen events might occur that would subsequently change the fair values of these investments, but such changes would be inconsequential to the company due to its minimal investments in these products (and the large offsetting noncontrolling interests resulting from their consolidation). Any gains or losses resulting from valuation changes in these investments are substantially offset by resulting changes in gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities and therefore do not have a

102


material effect on the financial condition, operating results (including earnings per share), liquidity or capital resources of the company’s common shareholders.
17. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATIONoption awards.
     The company recognized total expenses of $117.8 million, $90.8 million $97.7 million and $105.2$97.7 million related to equity-settled share-based payment transactions in 2010, 2009 2008 and 2007,2008, respectively. The total income tax benefit recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income for share-based compensation arrangements was $28.6$35.0 million for 2009 (2008:2010 (2009: $28.6 million; 2008: $32.1 million; 2007: $36.8 million).
     Cash received from exercise of share options and sharesave plan awards granted under share-based compensation arrangements was $80.0$19.6 million in 2009 (2008:2010 (2009: $80.0 million; 2008: $79.8 million; 2007: $137.4 million). The total tax benefit realized from share optionoptions exercises was $42.3$4.1 million in 2009 (2008: $54.92010 (2009: $5.2 million; 2007: $38.22008: $11.2 million).
Share Awards
     Share awards are broadly classified into two categories: time-vested and performance-vested. Share awards are measured at fair value at the date of grant and are expensed, based on the company’s estimate of shares that will eventually vest, on a straight-line or accelerated basis over the vesting period.
     Time-vested awards vest ratably over or cliff-vest at the end of a period of continued employee service. Performance-vested awards cliff-vest at the end of or vest ratably over a defined vesting period of continued employee service upon the company’s attainment of certain performance criteria, generally the attainment of cumulative earnings per share growth targets at the end of the vesting period reflecting a compound annual growth rate of between 10.0% and 15.0% per annum during a three-year period. Time-vested and performance-vested share awards are granted in the form of restricted share awards (RSAs) or restricted share units (RSUs). Dividends accrue directly to the employee holder of RSAs, and cash payments in lieu of dividends are made to employee holders of certain RSUs. There is therefore no discount to the fair value of these share awards at their grant date. Movements on share awards priced in Pounds Sterling prior to the company’s primary share listing moving to the New York Stock Exchange from the London Stock Exchange, which occurred on December 4, 2007, in connection with the redomicile of the company from the U.K. to Bermuda, are detailed below:
                                                        
 2009 2008 2007 2010 2009 2008
 Weighted Average         Weighted Average        
 Time- Performance- Grant Date Fair Time- Performance- Time- Performance- Time- Performance- Grant Date Fair Time- Performance- Time- Performance-
Millions of shares, except fair values Vested Vested Value (pence) Vested Vested Vested Vested Vested Vested Value (£ Sterling) Vested Vested Vested Vested
Unvested at the beginning of year 10.2 6.0 9.62 15.2 6.2 15.6 4.6  5.4 2.0 11.24 10.2 6.0 15.2 6.2 
Granted during the year      4.9 1.9 
Forfeited during the year  (0.3)  (0.3) 10.16  (0.7)  (0.1)  (1.4)  (0.3)  (0.1)  (1.4) 12.07  (0.3)  (0.3)  (0.7)  (0.1)
Modification of share-based payment awards*   (1.4) 9.37           (1.4)   
Vested and distributed during the year  (4.5)  (2.3) 7.87  (4.3)  (0.1)  (3.9)    (2.0)  (0.5) 10.01  (4.5)  (2.3)  (4.3)  (0.1)
                              
Unvested at the end of the year 5.4 2.0 11.24 10.2 6.0 15.2 6.2  3.3 0.1 11.80 5.4 2.0 10.2 6.0 
                              
 
* During the year ended December 31, 2009, the company modified the terms of 1.4 million equity-settled share-based payment awards such that the awards are now deferred cash awards. As a result of this modification, $13.0 million was reclassified out of additional paid in capital and into other current and non-current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet during the year. There was no impact to the Consolidated Statement of Income or earnings per share as a result of this modification.

103117


     Subsequent to the company’s primary share listing moving to the New York Stock Exchange, shares are now priced in U.S. dollars. Movements on share awards priced in U.S. dollars are detailed below:
                                
 Year ended December 31, 2009 Year ended December 31, 2008 Year ended December 31, 2010 Year ended December 31, 2009
 Weighted Average Weighted Average Weighted Average Weighted Average
 Time- Grant Date Time- Grant Date Time- Grant Date Time- Grant Date
Millions of shares, except fair values Vested Fair Value ($) Vested Fair Value ($) Vested Fair Value ($) Vested Fair Value ($)
Unvested at the beginning of period 3.5 26.64    11.6 15.24 3.5 26.64 
Granted during the period 8.9 11.51 3.6 26.65  10.6 19.11 8.9 11.51 
Forfeited during the period  (0.1) 17.27  (0.1) 27.01   (0.3) 19.36  (0.1) 17.27 
Vested and distributed during the period  (0.7) 24.98     (4.5) 16.04  (0.7) 24.98 
                  
Unvested at the end of the period 11.6 15.24 3.5 26.64  17.4 17.25 11.6 15.24 
                  
     All share awards outstanding at December 31, 2009,2010, had a weighted average remaining contractual life of 1.261.54 years. The total fair value of shares that vested during 20092010 was $125.3 million (2009: $130.2 million (2008:million; 2008: $138.3 million; 2007: $85.3 million). The weighted average fair value at the date of grant of the historical Pound Sterling vested and distributed share awards was 787p (2008: 752p; 2007: 665p)£10.01 (2009: £7.87; 2008: £7.52). The weighted average fair value at the date of grant of the U.S. dollar vested and distributed share awards was $24.98.$16.04.
     At December 31, 2009,2010, there was $150.1$221.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share awards; that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.213.4 years.
Share Options
     The company has not granted share option awards ofsince 2005. All share options since 2005.awards, therefore, were granted prior to the December 4, 2007, redomicile from the United Kingdom to Bermuda and relisting from the London Stock Exchange (where the predecessor company’s ordinary shares traded in Pounds Sterling) to the New York Stock Exchange (where the company’s common shares now trade in U.S. Dollars). The company maintains its two historical share option plans withwhich have outstanding share options: theThe 2000 Share Option Plan and the No. 3 Executive Share Option Scheme.
     Since November 2002, All remaining outstanding share option awards were fully vested and were expensed by the company over the applicable vesting periods (the latest of which ended prior to December 31, 2008). At the time of their grants, the exercise prices of the share options awarded underwere denominated in the 2000 Plan are subjectcompany’s trading currency, which was the Pound Sterling. The company did not change the accounting for share options at the redomicile/relisting date, because the share options were not modified at that date. The exercise price remains in Pounds Sterling and was not changed to the satisfactionU.S. Dollars. Therefore, upon exercise of the performance conditions described further below. The performance targets forshare options, the plan for options granted after November 2002 provide that an option granted to an eligible employee may vest only if earnings per share sincePound Sterling exercise price will be converted into U.S. Dollars using the date ofspot foreign exchange rate in effect on the award has grown by a specified percentage in excess of a weighted average of the U.K. Retail Price Index and the U.S. Consumer Price Index (the Composite Index) over the preceding three years.exercise date. Upon the exercise of share options, the company either issues new shares or can utilize shares held in treasury (see Note 10, “Share Capital”) to satisfy the exercise.
     The share option plans provideprovided for a grant price equal to the quoted market price of the company’s shares on the date of grant. The cliff vesting period is three years. If the options remain unexercised after a period of 10 years from the date of grant, the options expire. Furthermore, options are forfeited if the employee leaves the company before the options vest. The share option programs were valued using a stochastic model (a lattice model) at grant date. The company issues shares upon share option exercises from those held in Treasury.
 ��   Changes in outstanding share option awards are as follows:
                         
  2009 2008 2007
      Weighted     Weighted     Weighted
      Average     Average     Average
      Exercise     Exercise     Exercise
$ in millions, except prices Options Price Options Price Options Price
      (pence)     (pence)     (pence)
Outstanding at the beginning of year  23.1   1,406.00   29.7   1,296.72   40.5   1,220.54 
Forfeited during the year  (2.1)  1,514.59   (1.6)  1,419.28   (3.1)  1,399.81 
Exercised during the year  (4.6)  1,019.94   (5.0)  750.17   (7.7)  855.27 
                         
Outstanding at the end of the year  16.4   1,498.75   23.1   1,405.79   29.7   1,296.72 
                         
Exercisable at the end of the year  16.4   1,498.75   23.0   1,415.63   21.3   1,546.31 
                         
     The share option exercise prices are denominated in Pounds Sterling. Upon exercise, the Pound Sterling exercise price will be converted to U.S. dollars using the foreign exchange rate in effect on the exercise date. TheAll options outstanding at December 31, 2009,2010 were exercisable and had a range of exercise prices from 50 pence£6.39 to 3,360 pence,£28.80, and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 2.76 years (for options exercisable at December 31, 2009, the weighted average remaining contractual life is 2.76 years).2.20 years. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, and 2007 was $18.5 million, $20.7 million, $41.4 million and $67.9$41.4 million, respectively. At December 31, 2009,2010, the aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and options exercisable was $80.7 million and $80.7 million, respectively.$63.3 million. The market price of the company’company’s common stock at the end of 2009December 31, 2010 was $23.49.$24.06 (December 31, 2009: $23.49).
Changes in outstanding share option awards are as follows:
                         
  2010 2009 2008
      Weighted     Weighted     Weighted
      Average     Average     Average
      Exercise Price     Exercise Price     Exercise Price
Millions of shares, except prices Options (£ Sterling) Options (£ Sterling) Options (£ Sterling)
Outstanding at the beginning of year  16.4   14.99   23.1   14.06   29.7   12.97 
Forfeited during the year  (3.9)  21.90   (2.1)  15.15   (1.6)  14.19 
Exercised during the year  (1.8)  6.70   (4.6)  10.20   (5.0)  7.50 
                         
Outstanding at the end of the year  10.7   13.85   16.4   14.99   23.1   14.06 
                         
Exercisable at the end of the year  10.7   13.85   16.4   14.99   23.0   14.16 
                         

104118


Sharesave Plans
     The company operates a number of sharesave plans under which eligible employees may save up to £250 per month for periods up to three years. Options awarded under these plans may be exercised at the end of the contract periods, or alternatively the employee may have his or her savings returned.
     The employee share purchase plans were open to almost all employees and provide for a purchase price equal to the market price on the date of grant, less 15.0% to 20.0%. The shares can be purchased at the end of the 27- to 42-month savings contract. As of December 31, 2009, there are 0.2 million options to purchase shares outstanding under these programs. The fair value of these options was determined using the stochastic valuation model (a lattice model), and the weighted average contractual life of these awards is 1.0 years at December 31, 2009.
     At December 31, 2009, there was $0.1 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share options granted under sharesave plans; that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.5 years.
Employee Share Ownership Plan
     The company sponsors the Invesco Employee Share Ownership Plan (ESOP) for certain of its U.S.-based employees. The ESOP was a leveraged employee stock ownership retirement plan designed to invest primarily in company shares. The plan was closed to further participants effective January 1, 2000, and no contributions were made into this plan after this date. All shares held by the ESOP have been allocated to employee accounts.
18. OPERATING LEASES
     The company leases office space in the majority of its locations of business under non-cancelable operating leases. Sponsorship and naming rights commitments relate to Invesco Field at Mile High, a sports stadium in Denver, Colorado. These leases and commitments expire on varying dates through 2021. Certain leases provide for renewal options and contain escalation clauses providing for increased rent based upon maintenance, utility and tax increases.
     As of December 31, 2009, the company’s total future commitments by year under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows:
                 
          Sponsorship  
          and Naming  
$ in millions Total Buildings Rights Other
2010  61.1   52.9   6.0   2.2 
2011  55.0   47.2   6.0   1.8 
2012  55.7   47.9   6.0   1.8 
2013  54.6   46.9   6.0   1.7 
2014  46.1   38.4   6.0   1.7 
Thereafter  320.9   281.4   39.5    
                 
Gross lease commitments  593.4   514.7   69.5   9.2 
                 
Less: future minimum payments expected to be received under non-cancelable subleases  104.7   104.7       
                 
Net lease commitments  488.7   410.0   69.5   9.2 
                 
     The company recognized $51.7 million, $49.3 million, and $57.7 million in operating lease expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, including lease termination charges of $12.0 million in 2009, $5.1 million in 2008, however these costs were offset in 2008 by downward adjustments in rent costs for sub-let office properties of $8.2 million, and $7.4 million in 2007. These expenses are net of $12.8 million, $6.3 million and $1.6 million of sublease income in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
19.13. RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
Defined Contribution Plans
     The company operates defined contribution retirement benefit plans for all qualifying employees. The assets of the plans are held separately from those of the company in funds under the control of trustees. When employees leave the plans prior to vesting fully in the contributions, the contributions payable by the company are reduced by the amount of forfeited contributions.

105


     The total costamounts charged to the Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended December 31, 2009,2010, of $47.0 million (2009: $43.6 million, (2008: $44.3 million; 2007:2008: $44.3 million) representsrepresent contributions paid or payable to these plans by the company at rates specified in the rules of the plans. As of December 31, 2009,2010, accrued contributions of $17.1$18.9 million (2008: $21.0(2009: $17.1 million) for the current year will be paid to the plans when due.plans.
     The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act that was signed into law in the U.S. on March 23, 2010 and its related modifications as part of the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 did not have a material impact on the company’s financial statements during the year ended December 31, 2010. The company is evaluating whether these new regulations may require any longer-term changes in our benefit plans.
Defined Benefit Plans
     The company maintains legacy defined benefit pension plans for qualifying employees of its subsidiaries in the U.K., Ireland, Germany, Taiwan and the U.S. All defined benefit plans are closed to new participants, and the U.S. plan benefits have been frozen. Further, during the year ended December 31, 2009, the company terminated one of its U.S. defined benefit retirement plans. The company also maintains a postretirement medical plan in the U.S., which was closed to new participants in 2005. In 2006, the plan was amended to eliminate benefits for all participants who will not meet retirement eligibility by 2008. The assets of all defined benefit schemes are held in separate trustee-administered funds. Under the plans, the employees are generally entitled to retirement benefits based on final salary at retirement.
     The most recent actuarial valuations of plan assets and the present value of the defined benefit obligation were valued as of December 31, 2009.2010. The benefit obligation, related current service cost and prior service cost were measured using the projected unit credit method.
Benefit Obligations and Funded Status
     The amounts included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets arising from the company’s obligations and plan assets in respect of its defined benefit retirement plans is as follows:
                                
 Retirement Plans Medical Plan Retirement Plans Medical Plan
$ in millions 2009 2008 2009 2008 2010 2009 2010 2009
Benefit obligation  (330.2)  (271.2)  (48.5)  (46.8)  (336.1)  (330.2)  (52.4)  (48.5)
Fair value of plan assets 262.9 224.6 7.3 6.3  286.0 262.9 8.1 7.3 
                  
Funded status  (67.3)  (46.6)  (41.2)  (40.5)  (50.1)  (67.3)  (44.3)  (41.2)
                  
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:  
Non-current assets 0.2 1.1    1.0 0.2   
Current liabilities  (0.8)  (1.0)  (2.3)  (2.2)  (0.9)  (0.8)  (2.5)  (2.3)
Non-current liabilities  (66.7)  (46.7)  (38.9)  (38.3)  (50.2)  (66.7)  (41.8)  (38.9)
                  
Funded status  (67.3)  (46.6)  (41.2)  (40.5)  (50.1)  (67.3)  (44.3)  (41.2)
                  

119


     Changes in the benefit obligations were as follows:
                                
 Retirement Plans Medical Plan Retirement Plans Medical Plan
$ in millions 2009 2008 2009 2008 2010 2009 2010 2009
January 1 271.2 381.0 46.8 47.7  330.2 271.2 48.5 46.8 
Service cost 3.9 6.3 0.2 0.4  4.1 3.9 0.6 0.2 
Interest cost 16.6 20.8 2.8 2.5  18.2 16.6 2.7 2.8 
Contributions from plan participants  0.1 0.6 0.7    0.5 0.6 
Actuarial (gains)/losses 45.8  (43.8) 0.3  (2.7) 4.6 45.8 2.4 0.3 
Exchange difference 27.7  (83.3)     (11.8) 27.7   
Benefits paid  (7.3)  (9.9)  (2.2)  (1.8)  (9.2)  (7.3)  (2.3)  (2.2)
Termination benefits paid*  (27.7)       (27.7)   
                  
December 31 330.2 271.2 48.5 46.8  336.1 330.2 52.4 48.5 
                  
 
* During the year ended December 31, 2009, the company terminated one of its defined benefit retirement plans in the U.S. Termination benefits of $27.7 million were paid to plan participants.

106


     Key assumptions used in plan valuations are detailed below. Appropriate local mortality tables are also used. The postretirement benefit obligations reflect the anticipated annual receipt of the 28% subsidy on retiree prescription drug claims between $310 and $6,300 for 2010 (and adjusted annually in the future) as a result of the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003. The weighted average assumptions used to determine defined benefit obligations at December 31, 2009,2010, and 20082009 are:
                                
 Retirement Plans Medical Plan Retirement Plans Medical Plan
 2009 2008 2009 2008 2010 2009 2010 2009
Discount rate  5.68%  5.84%  5.80%  6.10%  5.65%  5.68%  5.20%  5.80%
Expected rate of salary increases  3.62%  3.09%  4.50%  4.50%  3.60%  3.62%  3.00%  4.50%
Future pension/medical cost trend rate increases  3.50%  2.88%  5.00%-8.00%  5.00%-8.00%  3.49%  3.50%  5.00%-7.75%  5.00%-8.00%
     Changes in the fair value of plan assets in the current period were as follows:
                                
 Retirement Plans Medical Plan Retirement Plans Medical Plan
$ in millions 2009 2008 2009 2008 2010 2009 2010 2009
January 1 224.6 341.3 6.3 7.6  262.9 224.6 7.3 6.3 
Actual return on plan assets 42.3  (44.2) 1.1  (1.4) 33.2 42.3 0.8 1.1 
Exchange difference 22.6  (69.5)     (5.9) 22.6   
Contributions from the company 8.0 6.9    6.3 8.0   
Contributions from plan participants   0.3 0.3    0.2 0.3 
Benefits paid  (7.3)  (9.9)  (0.4)  (0.2)  (9.2)  (7.3)  (0.2)  (0.4)
Settlement and other  (27.3)      (1.3)  (27.3)   
                  
December 31 262.9 224.6 7.3 6.3  286.0 262.9 8.1 7.3 
                  
     The components of the amount recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income at December 31, 2009,2010, and 20082009 are as follows:
                                
 Retirement Plans Medical Plan Retirement Plans Medical Plan
$ in millions 2009 2008 2009 2008 2010 2009 2010 2009
Prior service cost/(credit) 0.4 0.2  (15.9)  (18.0)  0.4  (13.9)  (15.9)
Transition obligation  (0.2)  (0.2)      (0.2)   
Net actuarial loss/(gain) 76.3 59.4 13.9 18.0  56.6 76.3 13.1 13.9 
                  
Total 56.6 76.5  (0.8)  (2.0)
 76.5 59.4  (2.0)           
         

120


     The amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income expected to be amortized into net periodic benefit cost during the year ending December 31, 20102011 are as follows:
                
$ in millions Retirement Plans Medical Plan Retirement Plans Medical Plan
Prior service cost/(credit)   (2.0)   (2.0)
Net actuarial loss/(gain) 3.4 3.1  2.0 2.8 
          
Total 3.4 1.1  2.0 0.8 
          
     The total accumulated benefit obligation, the accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets and the projected benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for pension plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets are as follows:
                
 Retirement Plans Retirement Plans
$ in millions 2009 2008 2010 2009
Plans with accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets:  
Accumulated benefit obligation 319.0  (262.2) 321.9 319.0 
          
Fair value of plan assets 251.2 214.1  274.2 251.2 
          
Plans with projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets:  
Projected benefit obligation 319.0  (262.2) 321.9 319.0 
          
Fair value of plan assets 251.2 214.1  274.2 251.2 
          

107


Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost
     The components of net periodic benefit cost in respect of these defined benefit plans are as follows:
                         
  Retirement Plans Medical Plan
$ in millions 2009 2008 2007 2009 2008 2007
Service cost  (3.9)  (6.2)  (7.6)  (0.2)  (0.4)  (0.1)
Interest cost  (16.6)  (20.8)  (19.3)  (2.7)  (2.5)  (2.6)
Expected return on plan assets  14.4   22.1   22.6   0.4   0.4   0.4 
Amortization of prior service cost/(credit)  (0.1)        2.0   2.0   2.0 
Amortization of net actuarial gain/(loss)  (2.7)  (1.4)  (1.9)  (3.6)  (4.3)  (4.6)
Settlement  (4.0)     (0.1)         
                         
Net periodic benefit cost  (12.9)  (6.3)  (6.3)  (4.1)  (4.8)  (4.9)
                         
Assumptions
                         
  Retirement Plans Medical Plan
$ in millions 2010 2009 2008 2010 2009 2008
Service cost  (4.1)  (3.9)  (6.2)  (0.6)  (0.2)  (0.4)
Interest cost  (18.2)  (16.6)  (20.8)  (2.7)  (2.7)  (2.5)
Expected return on plan assets  14.9   14.4   22.1   0.4   0.4   0.4 
Amortization of prior service cost/(credit)  (3.0)  (0.1)     2.0   2.0   2.0 
Amortization of net actuarial gain/(loss)     (2.7)  (1.4)  (2.7)  (3.6)  (4.3)
Settlement  0.6   (4.0)            
                         
Net periodic benefit cost  (9.8)  (12.9)  (6.3)  (3.6)  (4.1)  (4.8)
                         
     The weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 2008 and 20072008 are:
                        
 Retirement Plans Retirement Plans
 2009 2008 2007 2010 2009 2008
Discount rate  5.84%  5.73%  5.10%  5.68%  5.84%  5.73%
Expected return on plan assets  6.15%  6.93%  6.74%  6.20%  6.15%  6.93%
Expected rate of salary increases  3.09%  5.82%  5.41%  3.62%  3.09%  5.82%
Future pension rate increases  2.88%  3.28%  2.86%  3.50%  2.88%  3.28%
                        
 Medical Plan Medical Plan
 2009 2008 2007 2010 2009 2008
Discount rate  6.10%  5.75%  5.75%  5.80%  6.10%  5.75%
Expected return on plan assets  7.00%  7.00%  7.00%  7.00%  7.00%  7.00%
Expected rate of salary increases  4.50%  4.50%  4.50%  4.50%  4.50%  4.50%
Future medical cost trend rate increases  5.00%-8.00%  5.50%-9.00%  5.50%-9.00%  5.00%-8.00%  5.00%-8.00%  5.50%-9.00%
     In developing the expected rate of return, the company considers long-term compound annualized returns based on historical and current market data. Using this reference information, the company develops forward-looking return expectations for each asset category and an expected long-term rate of return for a targeted portfolio. Discount rate assumptions were based upon AA-rated corporate bonds of suitable terms and currencies.

121


     The assumed health care cost rates are as follows:
                        
 Medical Plan Medical Plan
 2009 2008 2007 2010 2009 2008
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year  8.00%  8.00%  9.00%  7.75%  8.00%  8.00%
Rate to which cost trend rate gradually declines  5.00%  5.00%  5.50%  5.00%  5.00%  5.00%
Year the rate reaches level it is assumed to remain thereafter 2015 2014 2011  2017 2015 2014 
     A one percent change in the assumed rate of increase in healthcare costs would have the following effects:
                
$ in millions Increase Decrease Increase Decrease
Effect on aggregate service and interest costs 0.4  (0.3) 0.5  (0.4)
Effect on defined benefit obligation 6.2  (5.2) 6.6  (5.6)

108


Plan Assets
     The analysis of the plan assets as of December 31, 20092010 was as follows:
                                
 Retirement % Fair Value of % Fair Value Retirement % Fair Value of % Fair Value
$ in millions Plans Plan Assets Medical Plan of Plan Assets Plans Plan Assets Medical Plan of Plan Assets
Cash and cash equivalents 6.4  2.4% 0.2  2.7% 6.5  2.3% 0.3  3.7%
Fund investments 122.8  46.7% 7.1  97.3% 117.4  41.0% 7.6  93.8%
Equity securities 89.4  34.0%    111.2  38.9% 0.2  2.5%
Government debt securities 29.7  11.3%    34.9  12.2%   %
Other assets 0.7  0.3%    1.8  0.6%   %
Guaranteed investments contracts 13.9  5.3%    14.2  5.0%   %
                  
Total 286.0  100.0% 8.1  100.0%
 262.9  100.0% 7.3  100.0%         
         
The analysis of the plan assets as of December 31, 20082009 was as follows:
                
$ in millions Retirement Plans Medical Plan Retirement Plans Medical Plan
Cash and cash equivalents 18.6 0.2  6.4 0.2 
Fund investments 54.7 6.1  122.8 7.1 
Equity securities 73.0   89.4  
Government debt securities 49.2   29.7  
Other debt instruments 11.8  
Other assets 17.3   0.7  
Guaranteed investments contracts 13.9  
 224.6 6.3      
Total 262.9 7.3 
     
     Plan assets are not held in company stock. The investment policies and strategies for plan assets held by defined benefit plans include:
Funding — to have sufficient assets available to pay members benefits;
Funding — to have sufficient assets available to pay members benefits;
Security — to maintain the minimum Funding Requirement;
Stability — to have due regard to the employer’s ability in meeting contribution payments given their size and incidence.

122


     The following table presents the carrying value of the minimum Funding Requirement;
Stability — to have due regard to the employer’s ability in meeting contribution payments given their size and incidence.
     Certain plan assets, including major security type for equity and debt securities, which are invested in affiliated funds. Plan assets are not held in company stock.measured at fair value as of December 31, 2010:
                 
  As of December 31, 2010
      Quoted Prices in    
      Active Markets Significant Other Significant
  Fair Value for Identical Observable Unobservable
$ in millions Measurements Assets (Level 1) Inputs (Level 2) Inputs (Level 3)
Cash and cash equivalents  0.3   0.3       
Fund investments  125.0   125.0       
Equity securities  111.4   111.4       
Government debt securities  34.9   12.6   22.3    
Other assets  1.8   1.8       
Guaranteed investments contracts  14.2         14.2 
                 
Total  287.6   251.1   22.3   14.2 
                 
     The following table presents the carrying value of the plan assets, including major security type for equity and debt securities, which are measured at fair value as of December 31, 2009:
                                
 As of December 31, 2009 As of December 31, 2009
 Quoted Prices in     Quoted Prices in    
 Active Markets Significant Other Significant Active Markets Significant Other Significant
 Fair Value for Identical Observable Unobservable Fair Value for Identical Observable Unobservable
$ in millions Measurements Assets (Level 1) Inputs (Level 2) Inputs (Level 3) Measurements Assets (Level 1) Inputs (Level 2) Inputs (Level 3)
Cash and cash equivalents 6.6 0.2 6.4   0.2 0.2   
Fund investments 129.9 129.9    129.9 129.9   
Equity securities 89.4 89.4    89.4 89.4   
Government debt securities 29.7 29.7    29.7  29.7  
Other assets 0.7 0.7    0.7 0.7   
Guaranteed investments contracts 13.9   13.9  13.9   13.9 
                  
Total 263.8 220.2 29.7 13.9 
 270.2 249.9 6.4 13.9          
         
     Information about the valuation hierarchy levels, the valuation techniques, and inputs used to measure fair value are detailed in Note 2, “Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities.” Level 1 assets are generally investments into the company’s affiliated funds for which a readily determinable market value exists.

109


     The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for each major category of plan assets measured at fair value. Information about the valuation hierarchy levels used to measure fair value is detailed in Note 2,3, “Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities.”
Cash and cash equivalents
     Cash equivalents include cash investments in money market funds and time deposits. Cash investments in money market funds are valued under the market approach through the use of quoted market prices in an active market, which is the net asset value of the underlying funds, and are classified within level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Cash investments in time deposits of $6.5 million held at December 31, 2010 (December 31, 2009: $6.4 million) are not included in the table above, as they are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Time deposits are valued at cost plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value, and are classified within level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.value.
Fund investments
     These plan assets are primarily invested in affiliated funds and are classified within level 1 of the valuation hierarchy andhierarchy. They are valued at the net asset value of shares held by the plan at year end.
Equity securities, government debt securities, corporate debt securities and other investments
     These plan assets are classified within level 1 of the valuation hierarchy and are valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded.
Government debt securities
     These plan assets are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy as they include index-linked bonds. Prices for these bonds are calculated using the relevant index ratio.

123


Guaranteed investment contractcontracts
     This asset isThese plan assets are classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy and isare valued through use of unobservable inputs by discounting the related cash flows based on current yields of similar instruments with comparable durations considering the credit-worthiness of the issuer.
     The following table shows a reconciliation of the beginning and ending fair value measurement for level 3 assets, which is comprised solely of the guaranteed investment contract,contracts, using significant unobservable inputs:
Year Ended
$ in millionsDecember 31, 2009
Balance, beginning of year12.6
Unrealized gains/(losses) relating to the instrument still held at the reporting date2.2
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements (net)(0.9)
Balance, end of year13.9
         
  Year Ended Year Ended
$ in millions December 31, 2010 December 31, 2009
Balance, beginning of year  13.9   12.6 
Unrealized gains/(losses) relating to the instrument still held at the reporting date  2.7   2.2 
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements (net)  (2.4)  (0.9)
         
Balance, end of year  14.2   13.9 
         
Cash Flows
     The estimated amounts of contributions expected to be paid to the plans during 20102011 is $7.9$6.1 million for retirement plans, with no expected contribution to the medical plan.
     There are no future annual benefits of plan participants covered by insurance contracts issued by the employer or related parties.
     The benefits expected to be paid in each of the next five fiscal years and in the five fiscal years thereafter are as follows:
                
$ in millions Retirement Plans Medical Plan Retirement Plans Medical Plan
Expected benefit payments:  
2010 6.2 2.3 
2011 6.9 2.5  6.5 2.5 
2012 7.4 2.6  7.0 2.6 
2013 8.0 2.7  7.6 2.8 
2014 8.6 2.9  8.1 3.0 
2015 8.8 3.1 
Thereafter in the succeeding five years 52.2 15.8  56.6 16.1 
14. OPERATING LEASES
     The company leases office space in the majority of its locations of business under non-cancelable operating leases. Sponsorship and naming rights commitments relate to Invesco Field at Mile High, a sports stadium in Denver, Colorado. These leases and commitments expire on varying dates through 2021. Certain leases provide for renewal options and contain escalation clauses providing for increased rent based upon maintenance, utility and tax increases.
     As of December 31, 2010, the company’s total future commitments by year under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows:
                 
          Sponsorship  
          and Naming  
$ in millions Total Buildings Rights Other
2011  67.7   59.9   6.0   1.8 
2012  65.7   58.0   6.0   1.7 
2013  63.2   55.5   6.0   1.7 
2014  62.8   55.2   6.0   1.6 
2015  62.7   56.7   6.0    
Thereafter  349.5   316.0   33.5    
                 
Gross lease commitments  671.6   601.3   63.5   6.8 
                 
Less: future minimum payments expected to be received under non-cancelable subleases  94.4   94.4       
                 
Net lease commitments  577.2   506.9   63.5   6.8 
                 

110124


     As discussed in Note 1, “Accounting Policies — Security Deposit Assets and Receivables and Security Deposit Payables,” the company is party to master lease agreements with various property owners and is party to sublease agreements with tenants in its capacity as asset manager of property portfolios. The company’s future commitments to the property owners is equal to and offset by the future minimum payments expected to be received from the tenants; therefore, these amounts are not included in the table above.
     The company recognized $60.1 million, $57.5 million, and $53.7 million in operating lease expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Lease termination charges of $12.0 million were incurred in 2009, however these costs were offset in 2008 by downward adjustments in rent costs for sub-let office properties of $8.2 million. These expenses are net of $11.4 million, $12.8 million and $6.3 million of sublease income in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
15. OTHER GAINS AND LOSSES, NET
The components of other gains and losses, net, are:
             
$ in millions 2010 2009 2008
Other gains:
            
Gain on sale of investments  9.9   5.9   10.7 
Unrealized gain on trading investments, net  14.2       
Net foreign exchange gains     8.4    
Net gain generated upon debt tender offer     3.3    
             
Total other gains  24.1   17.6   10.7 
             
Other losses:
            
Other-than-temporary impairment of available-for-sale investments  (7.0)  (8.2)  (31.2)
Net foreign exchange losses  (0.2)     (13.0)
Other realized losses  (1.3)  (1.6)  (6.4)
             
Total other losses  (8.5)  (9.8)  (50.6)
             
Other gains and losses, net  15.6   7.8   (39.9)
             
16. TAXATION
     The company and its subsidiaries file annual income tax returns in the United States (“U.S.”) federal jurisdiction, various U.S. state and local jurisdictions, and in numerous foreign jurisdictions. A number of years may elapse before an uncertain tax position, for which the company has unrecognized tax benefits, is finally resolved. To the extent that the company has favorable tax settlements, or determines that accrued amounts are no longer needed due to a lapse in the applicable statute of limitations or other reasons, such liabilities, as well as the related interest and penalty, would be reversed as a reduction of income tax expense (net of federal tax effects, if applicable) in the period such determination is made.
     The company’s (provision)\benefit for income taxes is summarized as follows:
             
$ in millions 2010 2009 2008
Current:
            
Federal  (44.6)  (6.7)  (41.4)
State  (9.9)  (1.4)  (6.9)
Foreign  (122.8)  (130.3)  (156.0)
             
   (177.3)  (138.4)  (204.3)
             
Deferred:
            
Federal  (10.2)  (9.2)  (31.9)
State  2.0   (0.6)  0.1 
Foreign  (11.5)     0.1 
             
   (19.7)  (9.8)  (31.7)
             
Total income tax (provision)/benefit  (197.0)  (148.2)  (236.0)
             

125


     The net deferred tax recognized in our balance sheet at December 31 includes the following:
         
$ in millions 2010 2009
Deferred Tax Assets:
        
Deferred compensation arrangements  113.1   89.6 
Expenses for vacating leased property  1.7   18.8 
Tax loss carryforwards  84.7   74.3 
Postretirement medical, pension and other benefits  28.2   29.6 
Investment basis differences  17.4   23.0 
Other  27.0   19.5 
         
Total Deferred Tax Assets
  272.1   254.8 
Valuation Allowance
  (84.3)  (73.2)
         
Deferred Tax Assets, net of valuation allowance
  187.8   181.6 
         
Deferred Tax Liabilities:
        
Deferred sales commissions  (12.5)  (12.3)
Goodwill and Intangibles  (361.1)  (30.7)
Undistributed earnings of subsidiaries  (3.1)  (2.3)
Revaluation reserve  (5.1)  (5.2)
Other  (4.6)  (7.6)
         
Total Deferred Tax Liabilities
  (386.4)  (58.1)
         
Net Deferred Tax Assets/(Liabilities)
  (198.6)  123.5 
         
     A reconciliation between the statutory rate and the effective tax rate on income from operations for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 is as follows:
             
  2010 2009 2008
Statutory Rate  35.0%  35.0%  35.0%
Foreign jurisdiction statutory income tax rates  (9.7)%  (7.4)%  (4.7)%
State taxes, net of federal tax effect  1.2%  1.4%  0.5%
Change in valuation allowance for unrecognized tax losses  2.3%  4.2%  2.0%
Other  0.9%  (1.7%)  0.1%
             
Effective tax rate (excluding noncontrolling interests)  29.7%  31.5%  32.9%
Gains/(losses) attributable to noncontrolling interests  (6.1)%  10.0%  3.0%
             
Effective tax rate per Consolidated Statements of Income  23.6%  41.5%  35.9%
             
     The company’s subsidiaries operate in several taxing jurisdictions around the world, each with its own statutory income tax rate. As a result, the blended average statutory tax rate will vary from year to year depending on the mix of the profits and losses of the company’s subsidiaries. The majority of our profits are earned in the U.S., Canada and the U.K. The current U.K. statutory tax rate is 28%, the Canadian statutory tax rate is 31% and the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate is 35%.
     On December 14, 2007, legislation was enacted to reduce the Canadian income tax rate over five years, which changed the rate to 33.5% in 2008 and 33.0% in 2009. The legislation was revised in December 2009, further reducing the rate to 31.0% in 2010, 28.25% in 2011, 26.25% in 2012, 25.5% in 2013, and 25% thereafter. On July 27, 2010, legislation was introduced to reduce the UK income tax rate to 27% on April 1, 2011. Further reductions to the main rate are proposed to reduce the rate by 1% per year to 24% by April 1, 2014. These reductions are expected to be introduced in future Finance Bills for each annual reduction. The reduction in our Canadian and UK deferred tax assets and liabilities as a result of these rate changes decreased our 2010 effective tax rate by 0.1% and is included in “Other” above.
     At December 31, 2010, the company had tax loss carryforwards accumulated in certain taxing jurisdictions in the aggregate of $261.1 million (2009: $222.5 million), approximately $17.3 million of which will expire between 2011 and 2015, $29.3 million which will expire after 2015, with the remaining $214.5 million having an indefinite life. A full valuation allowance has been recorded against the deferred tax assets related to these losses based on a history of losses in these taxing jurisdictions which make it unlikely that the deferred tax assets will be realized. We anticipate that future dividends paid to the UK from non-UK subsidiaries will meet one of the new classes of exemption and thus will not be subject to further UK tax.

126


     As a multinational corporation, the company operates in various locations around the world and we generate substantially all of our earnings from our subsidiaries. Under ASC 740-30 deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxes that would be payable on the unremitted earnings of the company’s subsidiaries, consolidated investment products, and joint ventures, except where it is our intention to continue to indefinitely reinvest the undistributed earnings. Our Canadian and U.S. subsidiaries continue to be directly owned by Invesco Holding Company Limited (formerly INVESCO PLC, our predecessor company), which is directly owned by Invesco Ltd. Our Canadian unremitted earnings, for which we are indefinitely reinvested, are estimated to be $1,131 million at December 31, 2010, compared with $1,016 million at December 31, 2009. If distributed as a dividend, Canadian withholding tax of 5.0% would be due. Dividends from our investment in the U.S. should not give rise to additional tax as we are not subject to withholding tax between the U.S. and U.K. Deferred tax liabilities in the amount of $3.1 million (2009: $2.3 million) for additional tax have been recognized for unremitted earnings of certain subsidiaries that have regularly remitted earnings and are expected to continue to remit earnings in the foreseeable future. The UK dividend exemption should apply to the remainder of our UK subsidiary investments. There is no additional tax on dividends from the U.K. to Bermuda.
     The company and its subsidiaries file annual income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various U.S. state and local jurisdictions, and in numerous foreign jurisdictions. A number of years may elapse before an uncertain tax position, for which the company has unrecognized tax benefits, is finally resolved. To the extent that the company has favorable tax settlements, or determines that accrued amounts are no longer needed due to a lapse in the applicable statute of limitations or other change in circumstances, such liabilities, as well as the related interest and penalty, would be reversed as a reduction of income tax expense (net of federal tax effects, if applicable) in the period such determination is made. At January 1, 2010, the company had approximately $39.0 million of gross unrecognized income tax benefits (UTBs). Of this total, $20.4 million (net of tax benefits in other jurisdictions and the federal benefit of state taxes) represents the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would favorably affect the effective tax rate in future periods. A reconciliation of the change in the UTB balance from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2010, is as follows:
Gross Unrecognized
$ in millionsIncome Tax Benefits
Balance at January 1, 200869.0
Additions for tax positions related to the current year5.1
Additions for tax positions related to prior years(0.2)
Other reductions for tax positions related to prior years(6.1)
Reductions for statute closings(11.9)
Balance at December 31, 200855.9
Additions for tax positions related to the current year0.3
Additions for tax positions related to prior years4.1
Other reductions for tax positions related to prior years(6.0)
Reductions for statute closings(15.3)
Balance at December 31, 200939.0
Additions for tax positions related to the current year
Additions for tax positions related to prior years1.8
Other reductions for tax positions related to prior years(0.5)
Reductions for statute closings(13.2)
Balance at December 31, 2010
27.1
     The company recognizes accrued interest and penalties, as appropriate, related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of the income tax provision. At December 31, 2010, the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits was $27.1 million. Of this total, $20.1 million (net of tax benefits in other jurisdictions and the federal benefit of state taxes) represents the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would favorably affect the effective tax rate in future periods. The Consolidated Balance Sheet includes accrued interest and penalties of $5.6 million at December 31, 2010, reflecting $7.7 million of tax benefit realized in 2010. As a result of the expiration of statutes of limitations for various jurisdictions and anticipated legislative changes, it is reasonably possible that the company’s gross unrecognized tax benefits balance may change within the next twelve months by a range of zero to $15.0 million. The company and its subsidiaries are periodically examined by various taxing authorities. With few exceptions, the company is no longer subject to income tax examinations by the primary tax authorities for years prior to 2003. Management monitors changes in tax statutes and regulations and the issuance of judicial decisions to determine the potential impact to uncertain income tax positions. As of December 31, 2010, management had identified no other potential subsequent events that could have a significant impact on the unrecognized tax benefits balance.

127


20.17. EARNINGS PER SHARE
     The calculation of earnings per share is as follows:
             
  Net Income       
  Attributable to  Weighted Average  Per Share 
$ in millions, except per share data Common Shareholders  Number of Shares*  Amount* 
2010
            
Basic earnings per share $465.7   460.4  $1.01 
Dilutive effect of share-based awards     2.8    
          
Diluted earnings per share $465.7   463.2  $1.01 
          
2009
            
Basic earnings per share $322.5   417.2  $0.77 
Dilutive effect of share-based awards     6.4    
          
Diluted earnings per share $322.5   423.6  $0.76 
          
2008
            
Basic earnings per share $481.7   388.7  $1.24 
Dilutive effect of share-based awards     10.4    
          
Diluted earnings per share $481.7   399.1  $1.21 
          
*The basic weighted average number of shares for the year ended December 31, 2008 was restated upon the adoption of guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 260 as discussed in Note 1. The adoption of this guidance resulted in a change to the reported basic earnings per share amount of $0.01, and did not impact diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2008.
     See Note 12, “Share-Based Compensation,” for a summary of share awards outstanding under the company’s share-based payment programs. These programs could result in the issuance of common shares that would affect the measurement of basic and diluted earnings per share.
     Options to purchase 5.7 million common shares at a weighted average exercise price of £19.47 were outstanding during the year ended December 31, 2010 (2009: 9.6 million share options at a weighted average exercise price of £20.30; 2008: 13.3 million share options at a weighted average exercise price of £18.88), but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the option’s exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares and therefore their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.
     There were no time-vested share awards that were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 due to their inclusion being anti-dilutive. There were no contingently issuable shares excluded from the diluted earnings per share computation during year ended December 31, 2010 (2009: 1.4 million contingently issuable shares; 2008: none), because the necessary performance conditions for the shares to be issuable had not yet been satisfied at the end of the respective period.

128


18. GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
     The company operates under one business segment, investment management. Geographical information is presented below. There are no revenues or long-lived assets attributed to the company’s country of domicile, Bermuda.
                         
              Continental    
$ in millions U.S. U.K./Ireland Canada Europe Asia Total
2010
                        
Operating revenues  1,680.8   1,305.8   370.7   44.3   86.1   3,487.7 
Inter-company  9.8   (131.3)  (10.1)  56.3   75.3    
                         
   1,690.6   1,174.5   360.6   100.6   161.4   3,487.7 
                         
Long-lived assets  169.3   79.6   7.6   2.8   13.1   272.4 
2009
                        
Operating revenues  1,131.6   1,037.9   353.1   42.8   61.9   2,627.3 
Inter-company  11.0   (103.7)  (8.8)  43.4   58.1    
                         
   1,142.6   934.2   344.3   86.2   120.0   2,627.3 
                         
Long-lived assets  127.2   75.0   7.7   3.1   7.7   220.7 
2008
                        
Operating revenues  1,427.8   1,231.7   516.6   58.9   72.6   3,307.6 
Inter-company  24.4   (143.4)  (16.1)  59.5   75.6    
                         
   1,452.2   1,088.3   500.5   118.4   148.2   3,307.6 
                         
Long-lived assets  125.9   61.9   8.1   0.9   8.5   205.3 
     Operating revenues reflect the geographical regions from which services are provided.
19. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
     Commitments and contingencies may arise in the ordinary course of business.
     The company has transactions with various private equity, real estate and other investment entities sponsored by the company for the investment of client assets in the normal course of business. Many of the company’s investment products are structured as limited partnerships. The company’s investment may take the form of the general partner or a limited partner, and the entities are structured such that each partner makes capital commitments that are to be drawn down over the life of the partnership as investment opportunities are identified. At December 31, 2009,2010, the company’s undrawn capital commitments were $77.6$136.4 million (2008: $36.5(2009: $77.6 million).
     The volatility and valuation dislocations that occurred from 2007 to 2009the date of this Report in certain sectors of the fixed income market have generated pricing issues in many areas of the market. As a result of these valuation dislocations, during the fourth quarter of 2007, Invesco elected to enter into contingent support agreements for two of its investment trusts to enable them to sustain a stable pricing structure. These two trusts are unregistered trusts that invest in fixed income securities and are available only to accreditedstrictly limited types of investors. In December 2009,2010, the agreements were amended to extend the term through June 30, 2010.2011; further extensions are likely. As of December 31, 2009,2010, the total committed support under these agreements was $51.0$36.0 million with an internal approval mechanism to increase the maximum possible support to $66.0 million at the option of the company. The recorded fairestimated value of the guarantees related to these agreements at December 31, 2009,2010, was estimated to be $2.5$2.0 million (December 31, 2008: $5.52009: $2.5 million), which was recorded in other current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The estimated value of these agreements is lower than the maximum support amount, reflecting management’s estimation that the likelihood of funding under the support agreements is low. Significant investor redemptions out of the trusts before the scheduled maturity of the underlying securities or significant credit default issues of the securities held within the trusts’ portfolios could change the company’s estimation of likelihood of funding. No payments havepayment has been made under either agreement nor has Invesco realized any lossesloss from the support agreements through the date of this Report. These trusts were not consolidated because the company was not deemed to be the primary beneficiary.
     A subsidiary of the company has received assessments from the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) for goods and services tax (GST) related to various taxation periods from April 1999 to December 2006 in the amount of $20.4 million related to GST on sales charges collected from investors upon the redemption of certain mutual funds. The company has objected to the assessments and sought remedial action in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. In November 2009, the company was successful in such remedial action and, as a result, anticipatesanticipated successfully contesting the assessments. As a resultIn November and December 2010, the Appeals Division of such actions, the CRA is currently considering its next steps and has not respondedruled in the company’s favor with

129


respect to assessments for certain of these taxation periods; these assessments were reversed by the company in this regard.CRA. At December 31, 2010, the remaining assessments totaled $12.3 million. Management believes that the CRA’s claims are unfounded and that this assessment isthese assessments are unlikely to stand, and accordingly no provision has been recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements; however, until resolution of the remaining assessments, the company secured a letter of credit in favor of the CRA for the same amount.
Acquisition Contingencies
     Contingent consideration related to acquisitions made prior to January 1, 2009 (the effective date of guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 805 — see Note 1, “Accounting Policies”), includes the following:
Earn-outs relating to the Invesco PowerShares acquisition. A contingent payment of up to $500.0 million could be due in October 2011, five years after the date of acquisition, based on compound annual growth in management fees (as defined and adjusted pursuant to the acquisition agreement) from an assumed base of $17.5 million at closing. The Year 5 management fees will be reduced by $50.0 million, for purposes of the calculation, since the second contingent payment was earned. For a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) in Year 5 below 15%, no additional payment will be made. For a CAGR in Year 5 between 15% and 75%, $5.0 million for each CAGR point above 15%, for a maximum payment of $300.0 million for a 75% CAGR. For a CAGR in Year 5 between 75% and 100%, $300.0 million, plus an additional $8.0 million for each CAGR point above 75%, for a maximum total payment of $500.0 million for a 100% CAGR.
Earn-outs relating to the W.L. Ross & Co. acquisition. Contingent payments of up to $55.0 million are due each year for the five years following the October 2006 date of acquisition based on the size and number of future fund launches in which W.L. Ross & Co. is integrally involved. The maximum remaining contingent payments of $110.0 million would require annual fund launches to total $4.0 billion. On October 29, 2009, a $33.8
Earn-outs relating to the Invesco PowerShares acquisition. A contingent payment of up to $500.0 million could be due in October 2011, five years after the date of acquisition, based on compound annual growth in management fees (as defined and adjusted pursuant to the acquisition agreement) from an assumed base of $17.5 million at closing. The Year 5 management fees will be reduced by $50.0 million, for purposes of the calculation, since the second contingent payment was earned. For a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) in Year 5 below 15%, no additional payment will be made. For a CAGR in Year 5 between 15% and 75%, $5.0 million for each CAGR point above 15%, for a maximum payment of $300.0 million for a 75% CAGR. For a CAGR in Year 5 between 75% and 100%, $300.0 million, plus an additional $8.0 million for each CAGR point above 75%, for a maximum total payment of $500.0 million for a 100% CAGR.
Earn-outs relating to the W.L. Ross & Co. acquisition. Contingent payments of up to $55.0 million are due each year for the five years following the October 2006 date of acquisition based on the size and number of future fund launches in which W.L. Ross & Co. is integrally involved. On December 9, 2010, a $26.3 million acquisition earn-out was paid to the former owners of W.L. Ross & Co., consisting of $6.5 million calculated at the April 3, 2009, earn-out measurement date and $27.3 million calculated at the October 3, 2009, earn-out measurement date. As a result of the transaction, goodwill was increased by this amount.
     On October 19, 2009, the company announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Morgan Stanley’s retail asset management business, including Van Kampen Investments. The transaction was valued at $1.5 billion (subject to adjustment), consisting of payments by Invesco of $500.0$25.8 million in cashcalculated at the April 3, 2010, earn-out measurement date and an aggregate of approximately 44.1$0.5 million Invesco common shares and non-voting common equivalent preferred shares, which will result in Morgan Stanley obtaining an approximately 9.3% equity

111


interestcalculated at the October 3, 2010, earn-out measurement date. Additionally, in the company.fourth quarter of 2010, the purchase agreement was amended resulting in certain changes to the timing of the final earn-out payment. As a result of these changes, an additional earn-out calculation was performed at December 31, 2010, and $14.1 million of the final earn-out was accrued at that date. As a result of these transactions, goodwill was increased by $40.4 million. The transaction has been approved by the boardsmaximum remaining contingent payments of directors of both companies and is expected$40.9 million would require 2011 fund launches to close in mid-2010, subject to customary regulatory, client and fund shareholder approvals.total $3.5 billion.
Legal Contingencies
     Following the industry-wide regulatory investigations in 2003 and 2004, multiple lawsuits based on market timing allegations were filed againstIn July 2010, various parties affiliated with Invesco. These lawsuits were consolidated in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, together with market timing lawsuits brought against affiliates of other mutual fund companies, and on September 29, 2004, three amended complaints were filed against company-affiliated parties: (1) a putative shareholder class action complaint brought on behalf of shareholders of AIMclosed-end funds formerly advised by Invesco Funds Group, Inc.; (2) aVan Kampen Investments or Morgan Stanley Investment Management included in the acquired business had complaints filed against them in New York State Court commencing derivative complaintlawsuits purportedly brought on behalf of certain AIMthe common shareholders of those funds. The funds are nominal defendants in these derivative lawsuits and the defendants also include Van Kampen Investments (acquired by Invesco on June 1, 2010), Morgan Stanley Investment Management and certain officers and trustees of the funds who are or were employees of those firms. Invesco has certain obligations under the applicable acquisition agreement regarding the defense costs and any damages associated with this litigation. The plaintiffs allege breaches of fiduciary duties owed by the non-fund defendants to the funds’ common shareholders related to the funds’ redemption in prior periods of Auction Rate Preferred Securities (“ARPS”) theretofore issued by the funds. The complaints are similar to other complaints recently filed against investment advisers, officers and trustees of closed-end funds in other fund complexes which issued and redeemed ARPS. The complaints allege that the advisers, distributors and certain officers and trustees of those funds breached their fiduciary duty by redeeming ARPS at their liquidation value when there was no obligation to do so and when the value of ARPS in the secondary marketplace were significantly below their liquidation value. The complaints also allege that the ARPS redemptions were principally motivated by the fund sponsors’ interests to preserve distribution relationships with brokers and other financial intermediaries who held ARPS after having repurchased them from their own clients. Certain other funds included in the acquired business have received demand letters expressing similar allegations. Such demand letters could be precursors to additional similar lawsuits being commenced against those other funds. The Boards of Trustees of the funds are evaluating the complaints and demand letters and have established special committees of independent trustees to conduct an inquiry regarding the allegations. Invesco believes the cases should be dismissed following completion of such funds; and (3) an ERISA complaint purportedly brought on behalfreview period, although there can be no assurance of participants in the company’s 401(k) plan. The company and plaintiffs have reached settlements in principle of these lawsuits. The proposed settlements,that result. Invesco intends to defend vigorously any cases which are subjectmay survive beyond initial motions to court approval, call for a payment by the company of $9.8 million, recorded in general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Income in 2007, in exchange for dismissal with prejudice of all pending claims. In addition, under the terms of the proposed settlements, the company may incur certain costs in connection with providing notice of the proposed settlements to affected shareholders. Based on information currently available, it is not believed that any such incremental notice costs will have any material effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the company.dismiss.
     The assetinvestment management industry also is subject to extensive levels of ongoing regulatory oversight and examination. In the United States and other jurisdictions in which the company operates, governmental authorities regularly make inquiries, hold investigations and administer market conduct examinations with respect to compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Additional lawsuits or regulatory enforcement actions arising out of these inquiries may in the future be filed against the company and related entities and individuals in the U.S. and other jurisdictions in which the company and its affiliates operate. Any material loss of

130


investor and/or client confidence as a result of such inquiries and/or litigation could result in a significant decline in assets under management, which would have an adverse effect on the company’s future financial results and its ability to grow its business.
     In the normal course of its business, the company is subject to various litigation matters. Although there can be no assurances, at this time management believes, based on information currently available to it, that it is not probable that the ultimate outcome of any of these actions will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition or results of operations of the company.
20. CONSOLIDATED INVESTMENT PRODUCTS
     The company’s risk with respect to each investment in consolidated investment products is limited to its equity ownership and any uncollected management fees. Therefore, the gains or losses of consolidated investment products have not had a significant impact on the company’s results of operations, liquidity or capital resources. The company has no right to the benefits from, nor does it bear the risks associated with, these investments, beyond the company’s minimal direct investments in, and management fees generated from, the investment products. If the company were to liquidate, these investments would not be available to the general creditors of the company, and as a result, the company does not consider investments held by consolidated investment products to be company assets. Additionally, the collateral assets of consolidated CLOs are held solely to satisfy the obligations of the CLOs, and the investors in the consolidated CLOs have no recourse to the general credit of the company for the notes issued by the CLOs.
CLOs
     A significant portion of consolidated investment products are CLOs. CLOs are investment vehicles created for the sole purpose of issuing collateralized loan instruments that offer investors the opportunity for returns that vary with the risk level of their investment. The notes issued by the CLOs are backed by diversified collateral asset portfolios consisting primarily of loans or structured debt. For managing the collateral for the CLO entities, the company earns investment management fees, including in some cases subordinated management fees, as well as contingent incentive fees. The company has invested in certain of the entities, generally taking a portion of the unrated, junior subordinated position. The company’s investments in CLOs are generally subordinated to other interests in the entities and entitle the company and other subordinated tranche investors to receive the residual cash flows, if any, from the entities. The company’s subordinated interest can take the form of (1) subordinated notes, (2) income notes or (3) preference/preferred shares. The company has determined that, although the junior tranches have certain characteristics of equity, they should be accounted for and disclosed as debt on the company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet, as the subordinated and income notes have a stated maturity indicating a date for which they are mandatorily redeemable. The preference shares are also classified as debt, as redemption is required only upon liquidation or termination of the CLO and not of the company.
     Prior to the adoption of guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 810 (discussed in Note 1, “Accounting Policies”), the company’s ownership interests, which were classified as available-for-sale investments on the company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets, combined with its other interests (management and incentive fees), were quantitatively assessed to determine if the company is the primary beneficiary of these entities. The company determined, for periods prior to the adoption of this guidance, that it did not absorb the majority of the expected gains or losses from the CLOs and therefore was not their primary beneficiary.
     Upon adoption of additional guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 810, the company determined that it was the primary beneficiary of certain CLOs, as it has the power to direct the activities of the CLOs that most significantly impact the CLOs’ economic performance, and the obligation to absorb losses/right to receive benefits from the CLOs that could potentially be significant to the CLOs. The primary beneficiary assessment includes an analysis of the rights of the company in its capacity as investment manager. In certain CLOs, the company’s role as investment manager provides that the company contractually has the power, as defined in ASC Topic 810, to direct the activities of the CLOs that most significantly impact the CLOs’ economic performance, such as managing the collateral portfolio and its credit risk. In other CLOs, the company determined that it does not have this power in its role as investment manager due to certain restrictions that limit its ability to manage the collateral portfolio and its credit risk. Additionally, the primary beneficiary assessment includes an analysis of the company’s rights to receive benefits and obligations to absorb losses associated with its first loss position and management/incentive fees. As part of this analysis, the company uses a quantitative model to corroborate its qualitative assessments. The quantitative model includes an analysis of the expected performance of the CLOs and a comparison of the company’s absorption of this performance relative to the other investors in the CLOs. The company has determined that it could receive significant benefits and/or absorb significant losses from certain CLOs in which it holds a first loss position and has the right to significant fees. It was determined that the company’s benefits and losses from certain other CLOs could not be significant, particularly in situations where the company does not hold a first loss position and where the fee interests are based upon a fixed percentage of collateral asset value.

131


Private equity, real estate and fund-of-funds (partnerships)
     For investment products that are structured as partnerships and are determined to be VIEs, including private equity funds, real estate funds and fund-of-funds products, the company evaluates the structure of the partnership to determine if it is the primary beneficiary of the investment product. This evaluation includes assessing the rights of the limited partners to transfer their economic interests in the investment product. If the limited partners lack rights to manage their economic interests, they are considered to be de facto agents of the company, resulting in the company determining that it is the primary beneficiary of the investment product. The company generally takes less than a 1% investment in these entities as the general partner. Non-VIE general partnership investments are deemed to be controlled by the company and are consolidated under a voting interest entity (VOE) model, unless the limited partners have the substantive ability to remove the general partner without cause based upon a simple majority vote or can otherwise dissolve the partnership, or unless the limited partners have substantive participating rights over decision-making. Interests in unconsolidated private equity funds, real estate funds and fund-of-funds products are classified as equity method investments in the company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
     On July 8, 2009, the U.S. Treasury announced the launch of the Public-Private Investment Program (PPIP), which was designed to support market functioning and facilitate price discovery in the asset-based securities markets, to allow banks and other financial institutions to re-deploy capital, and to extend new credit to households and businesses. Under this program, the U.S. Treasury will invest up to $30.0 billion of equity and debt into funds established with private sector investment managers and private investors for the purpose of purchasing legacy securities. The U.S. Treasury has partnered with eight investment management firms, including Invesco, in the PPIP. The company determined that certain feeder funds within the Invesco-sponsored PPIP partnership structure are VIEs; however, the company is not their primary beneficiary, as it does not absorb the majority of the expected gains or losses from these funds. Additionally, the company does not have any capital invested or committed into these funds. Other funds within the PPIP structure are VOEs; however, the company as general partner is not deemed to control these entities due to the presence of substantive kick-out or liquidation rights.
Other investment products
     As discussed in Note 19, “Commitments and Contingencies,” the company has entered into contingent support agreements for two of its investment trusts to enable them to sustain a stable pricing structure, creating variable interests in these VIEs. The company earns management fees from the trusts and has a small investment in one of these trusts. The company was not deemed to be the primary beneficiary of these trusts after considering any explicit and implicit variable interests in relation to the total expected gains and losses of the trusts.
     In June 2009, the company invested in the initial public offering of Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (NYSE: IVR), a real estate investment trust which is managed by the company. The company purchased 75,000 common shares of IVR at $20.00 per share and 1,425,000 limited partner units at $20.00 per unit through private placements for a total of $30.0 million. The company determined that IVR is a VIE and that its investment represents a variable interest. The company’s ownership interests, which are classified as equity method investments on the company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets, combined with its other interests (management fees), were quantitatively assessed to determine if the company is the primary beneficiary of IVR. The company determined that it did not absorb the majority of the expected gains or losses from IVR and therefore is not its primary beneficiary.
     At December 31, 2010, the company’s maximum risk of loss in significant VIEs in which the company is not the primary beneficiary is presented in the table below.
             
          Company’s Maximum
$ in millions Footnote Reference Carrying Value Risk of Loss
CLO investments  3   0.5   0.5 
Partnership and trust investments     18.4   18.4 
Investments in Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc.     32.9   32.9 
Support agreements*  19   (2.0)  36.0 
             
Total          87.8 
             
*As of December 31, 2010, the committed support under these agreements was $36.0 million with an internal approval mechanism to increase the maximum possible support to $66.0 million at the option of the company.

132


     During the year ended December 31, 2010, entities were consolidated due to the adoption of guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 810 and business combinations. As a result of the acquisition of Morgan Stanley’s retail asset management business, CLOs with total assets of $805.4 million were consolidated as of June 1, 2010 and increased appropriated retained earnings by $149.4 million at that date. As a result of the acquisition of AIG Asia Real Estate, certain real estate funds with total assets of $385.9 million were consolidated at December 31, 2010 and increased noncontrolling interests by $363.6 million. The table below illustrates the summary balance sheet amounts related to these entities consolidated during the year. Balances are reflective of the amounts at the respective consolidation dates and are before consolidation into the company.
Balance Sheet
         
$ in millions CLOs - VIEs VOEs
   
Year ended December 31, 2010
        
Current assets  281.6   96.0 
Non-current assets  6,188.1   289.9 
     
Total assets  6,469.7   385.9 
     
Current liabilities  162.6   1.6 
Non-current liabilities  5,883.4    
     
Total liabilities  6,046.0   1.6 
     
Total equity  423.7   384.3 
   
Total liabilities and equity  6,469.7   385.9 
   
     During the year ended December 31, 2009, the company deconsolidated $53.3 million of investments held by consolidated investment products and related noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities as a result of determining that the company is no longer the primary beneficiary. The amounts deconsolidated from the Consolidated Balance Sheet are illustrated in the table below. There was no net impact to the Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2009, from the deconsolidation of these investment products.
Balance Sheet
$ in millionsOther VIEs
Year ended December 31, 2009
Current assets
Non-current assets53.3
Total assets53.3
Current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Total liabilities
Equity attributable to common shareholders
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities53.3
Total liabilities and equity53.3
     The following tables reflect the impact of consolidation of investment products into the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, and the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008.

133


Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
                         
  Before CLOs– Other      
$ in millions Consolidation(1) VIEs(2) VIEs VOEs Adjustments(3) Total
As of December 31, 2010
                        
Current assets  3,480.0   679.3   3.7   133.8   (22.3)  4,274.5 
Non-current assets  9,025.1   6,204.6   59.6   941.3   (61.0)  16,169.6 
                         
Total assets  12,505.1   6,883.9   63.3   1075.1   (83.3)  20,444.1 
                         
Current liabilities  2,777.9   500.2   0.9   7.8   (22.3)  3,264.5 
Long-term debt of consolidated investment products     5,888.2         (22.8)  5,865.4 
Other non-current liabilities  1,953.3               1,953.3 
                         
Total liabilities  4,731.2   6,388.4   0.9   7.8   (45.1)  11,083.2 
                         
Retained earnings appropriated for investors in consolidated investment products     495.5            495.5 
Other equity attributable to common shareholders  7,769.1      0.1   38.1   (38.2)  7,769.1 
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities  4.8      62.3   1,029.2      1,096.3 
                         
Total liabilities and equity  12,505.1   6,883.9   63.3   1,075.1   (83.3)  20,444.1 
                         
                     
  Before Other      
$ in millions Consolidation(1) VIEs VOEs Adjustments(3) Total
As of December 31, 2009
                    
Current assets  3,089.8   4.2   27.0      3,121.0 
Non-current assets  7,111.8   67.9   617.1   (8.2)  7,788.6 
                     
Total assets  10,201.6   72.1   644.1   (8.2)  10,909.6 
                     
Current liabilities  2,293.6   0.7   4.1      2,298.4 
Non-current liabilities  990.4            990.4 
                     
Total liabilities  3,284.0   0.7   4.1      3,288.8 
                     
Total equity attributable to common shareholders  6,912.9   0.2   8.0   (8.2)  6,912.9 
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities  4.7   71.2   632.0      707.9 
                     
Total liabilities and equity  10,201.6   72.1   644.1   (8.2)  10,909.6 
                     
(1)The Before Consolidation column includes Invesco’s equity interest in the investment products subsequently consolidated, accounted for as equity method and available-for-sale investments.
(2)The company adopted guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 810 on January 1, 2010, resulting in the consolidation of certain CLOs. In accordance with the standard, prior periods have not been restated to reflect the consolidation of these CLOs. Prior to January 1, 2010, the company was not deemed to be the primary beneficiary of these CLOs.
(3)Adjustments include the elimination of intercompany transactions between the company and its consolidated investment products, primarily the elimination of the company’s equity at risk recorded as investments by the company (before consolidation) against either equity (private equity and real estate partnership funds) or subordinated debt (CLOs) of the funds.

134


Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income
                         
  Before CLOs– Other      
$ in millions Consolidation(1) VIEs(2) VIEs VOEs Adjustments(1)(3) Total
Year ended December 31, 2010
                        
Total operating revenues  3,532.7         0.3   (45.3)  3,487.7 
Total operating expenses  2,887.8   41.4   1.6   12.3   (45.3)  2,897.8 
                         
Operating income  644.9   (41.4)  (1.6)  (12.0)     589.9 
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates  40.8            (0.6)  40.2 
Interest and dividend income  10.4   246.0         (5.1)  251.3 
Other investment income/(losses)  15.6   (3.8)  6.9   104.5   6.4   129.6 
Interest expense  (58.6)  (123.7)        5.1   (177.2)
                         
Income before income taxes, including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests  653.1   77.1   5.3   92.5   5.8   833.8 
Income tax provision  (197.0)              (197.0)
                         
Net income, including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests  456.1   77.1   5.3   92.5   5.8   636.8 
(Gains)/losses attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities, net  (0.2)  (77.1)  (5.3)  (88.4)  (0.1)  (171.1)
                         
Net income attributable to common shareholders  455.9         4.1   5.7   465.7 
                         
                     
  Before        
$ in millions Consolidation(1) VIEs VOEs Adjustments(3) Total
Year ended December 31, 2009
                    
Total operating revenues  2,633.3   0.3   1.6   (7.9)  2,627.3 
Total operating expenses  2,139.5   1.8   9.6   (7.9)  2,143.0 
                     
Operating income  493.8   (1.5)  (8.0)     484.3 
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates  24.5         2.5   27.0 
Interest and dividend income  9.8            9.8 
Other investment income/(losses)  7.8   (11.6)  (95.3)     (99.1)
Interest expense  (64.5)           (64.5)
                     
Income before income taxes, including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests  471.4   (13.1)  (103.3)  2.5   357.5 
Income tax provision  (148.2)           (148.2)
                     
Net income/(loss), including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests  323.2   (13.1)  (103.3)  2.5   209.3 
(Gains)/losses attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities, net  (0.7)  13.1   100.8      113.2 
                     
Net income attributable to common shareholders  322.5      (2.5)  2.5   322.5 
                     
See accompanying notes to these tables on the following page.

135


                     
  Before        
$ in millions Consolidation(1) VIEs VOEs Adjustments(3) Total
Year ended December 31, 2008
                    
Total operating revenues  3,308.4   0.3   5.2   (6.3)  3,307.6 
Total operating expenses  2,555.3   1.5   9.3   (6.3)  2,559.8 
                     
Operating income  753.1   (1.2)  (4.1)     747.8 
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates  45.9         0.9   46.8 
Interest and dividend income  37.2            37.2 
Other investment income/(losses)  (39.9)  15.5   (73.5)     (97.9)
Interest expense  (76.9)           (76.9)
                     
Income before income taxes, including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests  719.4   14.3   (77.6)  0.9   657.0 
Income tax provision  (236.0)           (236.0)
                     
Net income, including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests  483.4   14.3   (77.6)  0.9   421.0 
(Gains)/losses attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities, net  (1.7)  (14.3)  76.7      60.7 
                     
Net income attributable to common shareholders  481.7      (0.9)  0.9   481.7 
                     
(1)The Before Consolidation column includes Invesco’s equity interest in the investment products accounted for as equity method (private equity and real estate partnership funds) and available-for-sale investments (CLOs). Upon consolidation of the CLOs, the company’s and the CLOs’ accounting policies were effectively aligned, resulting in the reclassification of the company’s gain for the year ended December 31, 2010 of $6.4 million (representing the increase in the market value of the company’s holding in the consolidated CLOs) from other comprehensive income into other gains/losses. The company’s gain on its investment in the CLOs (before consolidation) eliminates with the company’s share of the offsetting loss on the CLOs’ debt. The net income arising from consolidation of CLOs is therefore completely attributed to other investors in these CLOs, as the company’s share has been eliminated through consolidation.
(2)The company adopted guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 810 on January 1, 2010, resulting in the consolidation of certain CLOs. In accordance with the standard, prior periods have not been restated to reflect the consolidation of these CLOs. Prior to January 1, 2010, the company was not deemed to be the primary beneficiary of these CLOs.
(3)Adjustments include the elimination of intercompany transactions between the company and its consolidated investment products, primarily the elimination of management fees expensed by the funds and recorded as operating revenues (before consolidation) by the company.

136


     The carrying value of investments held, derivative contracts, and notes issued by consolidated investment products is also their fair value. The following table presents the fair value hierarchy levels of investments held, derivative contracts, and notes issued by consolidated investment products, which are measured at fair value as of December 31, 2010:
                 
  As of December 31, 2010
      Quoted Prices in    
      Active Markets for Significant Other Significant
  Fair Value Identical Assets Observable Inputs Unobservable
$ in millions Measurements (Level 1) (Level 2) Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:                
CLO collateral assets:                
Bank loans  5,910.6      5,910.6    
Bonds  261.1   261.1       
Equity securities  32.9   32.9       
CLO-related derivative assets  20.2      20.2    
Private equity fund assets:                
Equity securities  114.4   17.6   ���   96.8 
Investments in other private equity funds  586.1         586.1 
Debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury  11.0   11.0       
Real estate investments  289.9         289.9 
                 
Total assets at fair value  7,226.2   332.6   5,930.8   972.8 
                 
Liabilities:                
CLO notes  (5,865.4)        (5,865.4)
CLO-related derivative liabilities  (6.6)     (6.6)   
                 
Total liabilities at fair value  (5,872.0)     (6.6)  (5,865.4)
                 
     The following table presents the fair value hierarchy levels of the carrying value of investments held by consolidated investment products, which are measured at fair value as of December 31, 2009:
                 
  As of December 31, 2009
      Quoted Prices in Significant  
      Active Markets Other Significant
  Fair Value for Identical Observable Unobservable
$ in millions Measurements Assets (Level 1) Inputs (Level 2) Inputs (Level 3)
Private equity fund assets:                
Equity securities  117.2   7.0      110.2 
Investments in other private equity funds  556.9         556.9 
Debt securities issued by U.S. Treasury  10.9   10.9       
                 
Total assets at fair value  685.0   17.9      667.1 
                 
     The following table shows a reconciliation of the beginning and ending fair value measurements for level 3 assets using significant unobservable inputs:
         
  For the year ended December 31,
$ in millions 2010 2009
Beginning balance  667.1   761.0 
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net  (81.2)  13.8 
Acquisition of businesses  289.9    
Gains and losses included in the Consolidated Statements of Income*  97.0   (107.7)
         
Ending balance  972.8   667.1 
         
*Included in gains and losses of consolidated investment products in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2010 are $46.5 million in net unrealized gains attributable to investments still held at December 31, 2010 by consolidated investment products (year ended December 31, 2009: $110.2 million net unrealized losses attributable to investments still held at December 31, 2009).

137


     The following table shows a reconciliation of the beginning and ending fair value measurements for level 3 liabilities using significant unobservable inputs:
Year Ended
$ in millionsDecember 31, 2010*
Beginning balance(5,234.9)
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements/prepayments, net209.1
Acquisition of businesses(630.2)
Gains/(losses) included in the Consolidated Statement of Income(414.3)
Foreign exchange204.9
Ending balance(5,865.4)
*The company adopted guidance now encompassed in ASC Topic 810 on January 1, 2010, resulting in the consolidation of certain CLOs. In accordance with the standard, prior periods have not been restated to reflect the consolidation of these CLOs. Prior to January 1, 2010, the company was not deemed to be the primary beneficiary of these CLOs.
Fair value of consolidated CLOs
     The collateral assets held by consolidated CLOs are primarily invested in senior secured bank loans, bonds, and equity securities. Bank loan investments, which comprise the majority of consolidated CLO portfolio collateral, are senior secured corporate loans from a variety of industries, including but not limited to the aerospace and defense, broadcasting, technology, utilities, household products, healthcare, oil and gas, and finance industries. Bank loan investments mature at various dates between 2011 and 2021, pay interest at Libor or Euribor plus a spread of up to 10.25%, and typically range in credit rating categories from BBB down to unrated. At December 31, 2010, the unpaid principal balance exceeded the fair value of the senior secured bank loans and bonds by approximately $261 million. Less than 2% of the collateral assets are in default as of December 31, 2010. CLO investments are valued based on price quotations provided by an independent third-party pricing source. For bank loan investments, in the event that the third-party pricing source is unable to price an investment, other relevant factors, data and information are considered, including: i) information relating to the market for the investment, including price quotations for and trading in the investment and interest in similar investments and the market environment and investor attitudes towards the investment and interests in similar investments; ii) the characteristics of and fundamental analytical data relating to the investment, including, for senior secured corporate loans, the cost, size, current interest rate, period until next interest rate reset, maturity and base lending rate, the terms and conditions of the senior secured corporate loan and any related agreements, and the position of the senior secured corporate loan in the borrower’s debt structure; iii) the nature, adequacy and value of the senior secured corporate loan’s collateral, including the CLO’s rights, remedies and interests with respect to the collateral; iv) for senior secured corporate loans, the creditworthiness of the borrower, based on an evaluation of its financial condition, financial statements and information about the business, cash flows, capital structure and future prospects; v) the reputation and financial condition of the agent and any intermediate participants in the senior secured corporate loan; and vi) general economic and market conditions affecting the fair value of the senior secured corporate loan.
     Notes issued by consolidated CLOs mature at various dates between 2014 and 2024 and have a weighted average maturity of 9.8 years. The notes are issued in various tranches with different risk profiles. The interest rates are generally variable rates based on Libor or Euribor plus a pre-defined spread, which varies from 0.21% for the more senior tranches to 7.50% for the more subordinated tranches. At December 31, 2010, the outstanding balance on the notes issued by consolidated CLOs exceeds their fair value by approximately $1.2 billion. The investors in this debt are not affiliated with the company and have no recourse to the general credit of the company for this debt.Notes issued by CLOs are recorded at fair value using an income approach, driven by cash flows expected to be received from the portfolio collateral assets. Fair value is determined using current information, notably market yields and projected cash flows of collateral assets based on forecasted default and recovery rates that a market participant would use in determining the current fair value of the notes, taking into account the overall credit quality of the issuers and the company’s past experience in managing similar securities. Market yields, default rates and recovery rates used in the company’s estimate of fair value vary based on the nature of the investments in the underlying collateral pools. In periods of rising market yields, default rates and lower debt recovery rates, the fair value, and therefore the carrying value, of the notes may be adversely affected. The current liquidity constraints within the market for CLO products require the use of certain unobservable inputs for CLO valuation. Once the undiscounted cash flows of the collateral assets have been determined, the company applies appropriate discount rates that a market participant would use, to determine the discounted cash flow valuation of the notes.

138


     The significant inputs used in the valuation of the notes issued by consolidated CLOs include a cumulative average default rate between 2% and 4% and discount rates derived by utilizing the applicable forward rate curves and appropriate spreads.
     Certain consolidated CLOs with Euro-denominated debt have entered into swap agreements with various counterparties to hedge economically interest rate and foreign exchange risk related to CLO collateral assets with non-Euro interest rates and currencies. These swap agreements are not designated as qualifying as hedging instruments. The fair value of derivative contracts in an asset position is included in the company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet in other current assets, and the fair value of derivative contracts in a liability position is included in the company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet in other current liabilities. These derivative contracts are valued under an income approach using forecasted interest rates and are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. Changes in fair value of $7.9 million are reflected in gains/(losses) of consolidated investment products, net on the company’s Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2010. At December 31, 2010, there were 105 open swap agreements with a notional value of $168.4 million. Swap maturities are tied to the maturity of the underlying collateral assets.
Fair value of consolidated private equity funds
     Consolidated private equity funds are generally structured as partnerships. Generally, the investment strategy of underlying holdings in these partnerships is to seek capital appreciation through direct investments in public or private companies with compelling business models or ideas or through investments in partnership investments that also invest in similar private or public companies. Various strategies may be used. Companies targeted could be distressed organizations, targets of leveraged buyouts or fledgling companies in need of venture capital. Investees of these consolidated investment products may not redeem their investment until the partnership liquidates. Generally, the partnerships have a life that range from seven to twelve years unless dissolved earlier. The general partner may extend the partnership term up to a specified period of time as stated in the Partnership Agreement. Some partnerships allow the limited partners to cause an earlier termination upon the occurrence of certain events as specified in the Partnership Agreement.
     For private equity partnerships, fair value is determined by reviewing each investment for the sale of additional securities of an issuer to sophisticated investors or for investee financial conditions and fundamentals. Publicly traded portfolio investments are carried at market value as determined by their most recent quoted sale, or if there is no recent sale, at their most recent bid price. For these investments held by consolidated investment products, level 1 classification indicates that fair values have been determined using unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets that the partnership has the ability to access. Level 2 classification may indicate that fair values have been determined using quoted prices in active markets but give effect to certain lock-up restrictions surrounding the holding period of the underlying investments.
     The fair value of level 3 investments held by consolidated investment products are derived from inputs that are unobservable and which reflect the limited partnerships’ own determinations about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the investments, including assumptions about risk. These inputs are developed based on the partnership’s own data, which is adjusted if information indicates that market participants would use different assumptions. The partnerships which invest directly into private equity portfolio companies (direct private equity funds) take into account various market conditions, subsequent rounds of financing, liquidity, financial condition, purchase multiples paid in other comparable third-party transactions, the price of securities of other companies comparable to the portfolio company, and operating results and other financial data of the portfolio company, as applicable.
     The partnerships which invest into other private equity funds (funds of funds) take into account information received from those underlying funds, including their reported net asset values and evidence as to their fair value approach, including consistency of their fair value application. These investments do not trade in active markets and represent illiquid long-term investments that generally require future capital commitments. While the partnerships’ reported share of the underlying net asset values of the underlying funds is usually the most significant input in arriving at fair value and is generally representative of fair value, other information may also be used to value such investments at a premium or discount to the net asset values as reported by the funds, including allocations of priority returns within the funds as well as any specific conditions and events affecting the funds.
     Unforeseen events might occur that would subsequently change the fair values of these investments, but such changes would be inconsequential to the company due to its minimal investments in these products (and the large offsetting noncontrolling interests resulting from their consolidation). Any gains or losses resulting from valuation changes in these investments are substantially offset by resulting changes in gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities and therefore do not have a material effect on the financial condition, operating results (including earnings per share), liquidity or capital resources of the company’s common shareholders.

139


Fair value of consolidated real estate funds
     Consolidated real estate funds are structured as limited liability companies. These limited liability companies invest in other real estate funds, and these investments are carried at fair value and presented as investments in consolidated investment products. The net asset value of the underlying funds, which primarily consists of the real estate investment value and mortgage loans, is adjusted to fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Real estate fund assets are classified within the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Due to the illiquid nature of investments made in real estate companies, all of the real estate fund assets are classified as Level 3. The real estate funds use one or more valuation techniques (e.g., the market approach, the income approach, or the cost approach) for which sufficient and reliable data is available to value investments classified within Level 3. The income approach generally consists of the net present value of estimated future cash flows, adjusted as appropriate for liquidity, credit, market and/or other risk factors.
     The inputs used by the real estate funds in estimating the value of Level 3 investments include the original transaction price, recent transactions in the same or similar instruments, as well as completed or pending third-party transactions in the underlying investment or comparable investments. Level 3 investments may also be adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability. Other inputs used include discount rates, cap rates and income and expense assumptions. The fair value measurement of Level 3 investments does not include transaction costs and acquisition fees that may have been capitalized as part of the investment’s cost basis. Due to the lack of observable inputs, the assumptions used may significantly impact the resulting fair value and therefore the real estate funds’ results of operations.
21. GUARANTOR CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
     Prior to the December 4, 2007, redomicile of the company from the United Kingdom to Bermuda and the relisting of the company from the London Stock Exchange to the New York Stock Exchange, INVESCO PLC (now known as Invesco Holding Company Limited),Limited, the Issuer and a subsidiary of Invesco Ltd. (the Parent), issued 4.5% $300.0 million senior notes due 2009, 5.625% $300.0 million senior notes due 2012, 5.375% $350.0 million senior notes due 2013 and 5.375% $200.0 million senior notes due 2014. These senior notes, are fully and unconditionally guaranteed as to payment of principal, interest and any other amounts due thereon by Invesco Ltd. (the Parent),the Parent, together with the following wholly owned subsidiaries: Invesco Aim Management Group, Inc., Invesco Aim Advisors,Advisers, Inc., Invesco North American Holdings, Inc., and Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc. (the Guarantors). On June 9, 2009, in connection with the new credit facility agreement discussed in Note 9, “Debt,” IVZ, Inc. also became a guarantor of the senior notes. On December 31, 2009, Invesco Aim Advisors, Inc. merged with Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc., which was renamed Invesco Advisers,Advisors, Inc. The company’s remaining consolidated subsidiaries do not guarantee this debt. The guarantees of each of the Guarantors are joint and several. Presented below are Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009,2010, and December 31, 2008,2009, Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income for the year ended December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008, and 2007,2008, and Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008, and 2007.2008.

112140


Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
                                                
 Non-         Non-        
$ in millions Guarantors Guarantors Issuer Parent Eliminations Consolidated Guarantors Guarantors Issuer Parent Eliminations Consolidated
2009
 
December 31, 2010
 
Assets held for policyholders  1,283.0    1,283.0   1,295.4    1,295.4 
Other current assets 211.5 1,591.7 3.1 31.7  1,838.0  175.7 2,766.7 3.0 33.7  2,979.1 
                          
Total current assets 211.5 2,874.7 3.1 31.7  3,121.0  175.7 4,062.1 3.0 33.7  4,274.5 
                          
Goodwill 2,302.8 3,709.4 455.4   6,467.6  2,322.9 4,216.5 440.8   6,980.2 
Investments in subsidiaries 714.9 5.7 4,697.7 6,859.3  (12,277.6)   1,333.8 5.5 4,766.1 8,400.6  (14,506.0)  
Other non-current assets 147.5 1,165.2 4.9 3.4  1,321.0  557.0 8,625.0 4.5 2.9  9,189.4 
                          
Total assets 3,376.7 7,755.0 5,161.1 6,894.4  (12,277.6) 10,909.6  4,389.4 16,909.1 5,214.4 8,437.2  (14,506.0) 20,444.1 
                          
Policyholder payables  1,283.0    1,283.0   1,295.4    1,295.4 
Other current liabilities 35.7 972.2 7.1 0.4  1,015.4  112.5 1,850.4 5.5 0.7  1,969.1 
                          
Total current liabilities 35.7 2,255.2 7.1 0.4  2,298.4  112.5 3,145.8 5.5 0.7  3,264.5 
                          
Intercompany balances 956.8  (1,660.0) 722.1  (18.9)    1,299.8  (1,449.6)  (22.1) 171.9   
Non-current liabilities 31.5 213.1 745.8   990.4  597.0 6,476.0 745.7   7,818.7 
                          
Total liabilities 1,024.0 808.3 1,475.0  (18.5)  3,288.8  2,009.3 8,172.2 729.1 172.6  11,083.2 
                          
Total equity attributable to common shareholders 2,352.7 6,238.8 3,686.1 6,912.9  (12,277.6) 6,912.9  2,380.1 7,640.6 4,485.3 8,264.6  (14,506.0) 8,264.6 
                          
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities  707.9    707.9   1,096.3    1,096.3 
                          
Total equity 2,352.7 6,946.7 3,686.1 6,912.9  (12,277.6) 7,620.8  2,380.1 8,736.9 4,485.3 8,264.6  (14,506.0) 9,360.9 
                          
Total liabilities and equity 3,376.7 7,755.0 5,161.1 6,894.4  (12,277.6) 10,909.6  4,389.4 16,909.1 5,214.4 8,437.2  (14,506.0) 20,444.1 
                          
                                                
 Non-         Non-        
$ in millions Guarantors Guarantors Issuer Parent Eliminations Consolidated Guarantors Guarantors Issuer Parent Eliminations Consolidated
2008
 
December 31, 2009
 
Assets held for policyholders  840.2    840.2   1,283.0    1,283.0 
Other current assets 96.9 1,401.8 10.7 24.4  1,533.8  211.5 1,591.7 3.1 31.7  1,838.0 
                          
Total current assets 96.9 2,242.0 10.7 24.4  2,374.0  211.5 2,874.7 3.1 31.7  3,121.0 
                          
Goodwill 2,302.8 3,236.8 427.2   5,966.8  2,302.8 3,709.4 455.4   6,467.6 
Investments in subsidiaries 718.2 2,201.7 4,081.3 5,658.5  (12,659.7)   714.9 5.7 4,697.7 6,859.3  (12,277.6)  
Other non-current assets 94.4 1,310.5 11.2   1,416.1  147.5 1,165.2 4.9 3.4  1,321.0 
                          
Total assets 3,212.3 8,991.0 4,530.4 5,682.9  (12,659.7) 9,756.9  3,376.7 7,755.0 5,161.1 6,894.4  (12,277.6) 10,909.6 
                          
Policyholder payables  840.2    840.2   1,283.0    1,283.0 
Other current liabilities 38.2 933.2 291.4 0.4  1,263.2  35.7 972.2 7.1 0.4  1,015.4 
                          
Total current liabilities 38.2 1,773.4 291.4 0.4  2,103.4  35.7 2,255.2 7.1 0.4  2,298.4 
                          
Intercompany balances 385.0  (768.7) 390.8  (7.1)    956.8  (1,660.0) 722.1  (18.9)   
Non-current liabilities 33.2 162.1 862.0   1,057.3  31.5 213.1 745.8   990.4 
                          
Total liabilities 456.4 1,166.8 1,544.2  (6.7)  3,160.7  1,024.0 808.3 1,475.0  (18.5)  3,288.8 
                          
Total equity attributable to common shareholders 2,755.9 6,917.5 2,986.2 5,689.6  (12,659.7) 5,689.5  2,352.7 6,238.8 3,686.1 6,912.9  (12,277.6) 6,912.9 
             
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities  906.7    906.7   707.9    707.9 
                          
Total equity 2,755.9 7,824.2 2,986.2 5,689.6  (12,659.7) 6,596.2  2,352.7 6,946.7 3,686.1 6,912.9  (12,277.6) 7,620.8 
                          
Total liabilities and equity 3,212.3 8,991.0 4,530.4 5,682.9  (12,659.7) 9,756.9  3,376.7 7,755.0 5,161.1 6,894.4  (12,277.6) 10,909.6 
                          

113141


Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income
                                                
 Non-         Non-        
$ in millions Guarantors Guarantors Issuer Parent Eliminations Consolidated Guarantors Guarantors Issuer Parent Eliminations Consolidated
2009
 
Year ended December 31, 2010
 
Total operating revenues 549.7 2,077.6    2,627.3  1,031.6 2,456.1    3,487.7 
Total operating expenses 432.1 1,701.3  (3.3) 12.9  2,143.0  742.4 2,140.2  15.2  2,897.8 
                          
Operating income/(loss) 117.6 376.3 3.3  (12.9)  484.3  289.2 315.9   (15.2)  589.9 
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates 17.1 53.3 148.3 326.3  (518.0) 27.0  5.7 33.4 266.5 477.3  (742.7) 40.2 
Other income/(expense)  (52.2)  (82.3)  (28.4) 9.1   (153.8)  (109.8) 347.8  (41.9) 7.6  203.7 
                          
Income before income taxes, including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests 82.5 347.3 123.2 322.5  (518.0) 357.5  185.1 697.1 224.6 469.7  (742.7) 833.8 
Income tax provision  (0.2)  (136.5)  (11.5)    (148.2)  (66.1)  (129.2) 2.3  (4.0)   (197.0)
                          
Net income, including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests 82.3 210.8 111.7 322.5  (518.0) 209.3  119.0 567.9 226.9 465.7  (742.7) 636.8 
Losses attributable to the noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities, net  113.2    113.2 
(Gains)/losses attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities, net   (171.1)     (171.1)
                          
Net income attributable to common shareholders 82.3 324.0 111.7 322.5  (518.0) 322.5  119.0 396.8 226.9 465.7  (742.7) 465.7 
                          
                                                
 Non-         Non-        
$ in millions Guarantors Guarantors Issuer Parent Eliminations Consolidated Guarantors Guarantors Issuer Parent Eliminations Consolidated
2008
 
Year ended December 31, 2009
 
Total operating revenues 683.6 2,624.0    3,307.6  549.7 2,077.6    2,627.3 
Total operating expenses  (512.5)  (2,020.7)  (9.5)  (17.1)   (2,559.8) 432.1 1,701.3  (3.3) 12.9  2,143.0 
                          
Operating income/(loss) 171.1 603.3  (9.5)  (17.1)  747.8  117.6 376.3 3.3  (12.9)  484.3 
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates 73.9 135.9 256.7 505.8  (925.5) 46.8  17.1 53.3 148.3 326.3  (518.0) 27.0 
Other income expense  (6.5)  (48.4)  (75.7)  (7.0)   (137.6)
Other income/(expense)  (52.2)  (82.3)  (28.4) 9.1   (153.8)
                          
Income before income taxes, including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests 238.5 690.8 171.5 481.7  (925.5) 657.0  82.5 347.3 123.2 322.5  (518.0) 357.5 
Income tax provision  (73.2)  (172.3) 9.5    (236.0)  (0.2)  (136.5)  (11.5)    (148.2)
                          
Net income, including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests 165.3 518.5 181.0 481.7  (925.5) 421.0  82.3 210.8 111.7 322.5  (518.0) 209.3 
Losses attributable to the noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities, net  60.7    60.7 
(Gains)/losses attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities, net  113.2    113.2 
                          
Net income attributable to common shareholders 165.3 579.2 181.0 481.7  (925.5) 481.7  82.3 324.0 111.7 322.5  (518.0) 322.5 
                          
                                                
 Non-         Non-        
$ in millions Guarantors Guarantors Issuer* Parent* Eliminations Consolidated Guarantors Guarantors Issuer Parent Eliminations Consolidated
2007
 
Year ended December 31, 2008
 
Total operating revenues 772.3 3,106.6    3,878.9  683.6 2,624.0    3,307.6 
Total operating expenses  (562.7)  (2,282.9)  (28.2)  (10.8)   (2,884.6) 512.5 2,020.7 9.5 17.1  2,559.8 
                          
Operating income/(loss) 209.6 823.7  (28.2)  (10.8)  994.3  171.1 603.3  (9.5)  (17.1)  747.8 
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates 75.9 183.1 684.7 684.4  (1,580.0) 48.1  73.9 135.9 256.7 505.8  (925.5) 46.8 
Other income/(expense)  (1.5) 214.4  (11.5)   201.4 
Other income expense  (6.5)  (48.4)  (75.7)  (7.0)   (137.6)
                          
Income before income taxes, including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests 284.0 1,221.2 645.0 673.6  (1,580.0) 1,243.8  238.5 690.8 171.5 481.7  (925.5) 657.0 
Income tax provision  (71.6)  (293.2) 7.5    (357.3)  (73.2)  (172.3) 9.5    (236.0)
                          
Net income, including gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests 212.4 928.0 652.5 673.6  (1,580.0) 886.5  165.3 518.5 181.0 481.7  (925.5) 421.0 
Gains attributable to the noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities, net   (212.9)     (212.9)
(Gains)/losses attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities, net  60.7    60.7 
                          
Net income attributable to common shareholders 212.4 715.1 652.5 673.6  (1,580.0) 673.6  165.3 579.2 181.0 481.7  (925.5) 481.7 
                          
*Prior to December 4, 2007, the Parent entity, INVESCO PLC, was also the issuer of the debt.

114142


Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
                                                
 Non-         Non-        
$ in millions Guarantors Guarantors Issuer Parent Eliminations Consolidated Guarantors Guarantors Issuer Parent Eliminations Consolidated
2009
 
Year ended December 31, 2010
 
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities 162.4  (182.0) 1.0 218.5 162.8 362.7  84.4 219.8 58.4 161.1  (144.5) 379.2 
Net cash (used in)/provided by investing activities  (26.1)  (139.3) 105.0  (538.0) 496.0  (102.4)  (742.4) 665.2  (57.5) 209.7  (412.8)  (337.8)
Net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities  (458.3) 803.7  (107.5) 320.2  (658.8)  (100.7) 570.0  (822.7)   (370.5) 557.3  (65.9)
                          
(Decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents  (322.0) 482.4  (1.5) 0.7  159.6   (88.0) 62.3 0.9 0.3   (24.5)
                          
                         
      Non-        
$ in millions Guarantors Guarantors Issuer Parent Eliminations Consolidated
2008
                        
Net cash provided by operating activities  130.3   409.8   77.1   524.0   (645.5)  495.7 
Net cash (used in)/provided by investing activities  (130.5)  106.4   102.8   (44.5)  (102.8)  (68.6)
Net cash used in financing activities     (747.4)  (182.0)  (485.3)  748.3   (666.4)
                         
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents  (0.2)  (231.2)  (2.1)  (5.8)     (239.3)
                         
                         
      Non-        
$ in millions Guarantors Guarantors Issuer Parent Eliminations Consolidated
Year ended December 31, 2009
                        
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities  162.4   (182.0)  1.0   218.5   162.8   362.7 
Net cash (used in)/provided by investing activities  (26.1)  (139.3)  105.0   (538.0)  496.0   (102.4)
Net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities  (458.3)  803.7   (107.5)  320.2   (658.8)  (100.7)
                         
(Decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents  (322.0)  482.4   (1.5)  0.7      159.6 
                         
                        
 Non-                                 
$ in millions Guarantors Guarantors Issuer* Parent* Eliminations Consolidated  Guarantors Non-
Guarantors
 Issuer Parent Eliminations Consolidated
2007
 
Year ended December 31, 2008
 
Net cash provided by operating activities 14.6 469.9 418.0 92.7  (81.5) 913.7  130.3 409.8 77.1 524.0  (645.5) 495.7 
Net cash (used in)/provided by investing activities  (9.1)  (33.6) 203.0   (206.7)  (46.4)  (130.5) 106.4 102.8  (44.5)  (102.8)  (68.6)
Net cash used in financing activities   (296.3)  (646.0)  (86.7) 288.2  (740.8)   (747.4)  (182.0)  (485.3) 748.3  (666.4)
                          
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 5.5 140.0  (25.0) 6.0  126.5 
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents  (0.2)  (231.2)  (2.1)  (5.8)   (239.3)
                          
*Prior to December 4, 2007, the Parent entity, INVESCO PLC, was also the issuer of the debt.
22. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
     On January 27, 2010,2011, the company declared a fourth quarter 20092010 dividend of $0.1025$0.11 per share, payable on March 10, 2010,9, 2011, to shareholders of record at the close of business on February 23, 2010.2011.
     AsSubsequent to year end, the Company received additional rulings from the Appeals Division of the date of this Report,CRA covering the committed support under the support agreements discussedassessments disclosed in Note 20,19, “Commitments and Contingencies,” was $36.0 million.Contingencies” for the 2003 to 2006 taxation years. These reassessments were also reversed. At February 14, 2011, the remaining outstanding assessments totaled $5.6 million, including interest and penalties. Management continues to believe that the CRA’s assessments are unlikely to stand; accordingly, no provision has been recorded.
Item 9.Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
     N/A
Item 9A.Item 9A.Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
     Management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2009.2010. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that the company’s

115


disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and forms, and that it is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

143


     Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting is located in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our independent auditors, Ernst & Young LLP, have issued an audit report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. This report appears in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 9B.Item 9B.Other Information
     None.

116144


PART III
Item 10.Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
     Invesco has filed the certification of its Chief Financial Officer with the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) as required pursuant to Section 303A.12 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. In addition, Invesco has filed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 302 certifications of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which certifications are attached hereto as Exhibit 31.1 and Exhibit 31.2, respectively.
     The information required by this Item will be included in the definitive Proxy Statement for the company’s annual meeting of shareholders, which will be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009,2010, and is incorporated by reference in this Report.
     The following is a list of individuals serving as executive officers of the company as of the date hereof. All company executive officers are elected annually and serve at the discretion of the company’s Board of Directors or Chief Executive Officer.
Note: Country listed denotes citizenship.
     Martin L. Flanagan, CFA, CPA (49)(50) President and Chief Executive Officer of Invesco Ltd. (U.S.A.)
     Martin L. Flanagan has been a director andis president and chief executive officer of Invesco, a position he has held since August 2005. He is also a member of the Board of Directors of Invesco and a trustee of the AIM Family ofInvesco Funds. Mr. Flanagan joined Invesco from Franklin Resources, Inc., where he was president and co-chief executive officer from January 2004 to July 2005. Previously he had been Franklin’s co-president from May 2003 to January 2004, chief operating officer and chief financial officer from November 1999 to May 2003, and senior vice president and chief financial officer from 1993 until November 1999. Mr. Flanagan served as director, executive vice president and chief operating officer of Templeton, Galbraith & Hansberger, Ltd. before its acquisition by Franklin in 1992. Before joining Templeton in 1983, he worked with Arthur Andersen & Co. Mr. Flanagan received a B.A. and BBA from Southern Methodist University (SMU). He is a CFA charter holder and a certified public accountant. He is vice chairman of the Investment Company Institute. He also serves as a member of the executive board at the SMU Cox School of Business and a member of the Board of Councilors of the Carter Center in Atlanta.
     G. Mark Armour(56)(57) Senior Managing Director and Head of Worldwide Institutional (Australia)
     Mark Armour has served as senior managing director and head of Invesco’s Worldwide Institutional business since January 2007. Previously, Mr. Armour served as head of sales and service for the institutional business. He was chief executive officer of Invesco Australia from September 2002 to July 2006. Prior to joining Invesco, Mr. Armour held significant leadership roles in the funds management business in both Australia and Hong Kong. He previously served as chief investment officer for ANZ Investments and spent almost 20 years with the National Mutual/AXA Australia Group, where he was chief executive, Funds Management, from 1998 to 2000. Mr. Armour received a bachelor of economics (honors) from La Trobe University in Melbourne, Australia.
     Kevin M. Carome(53)(54) Senior Managing Director and General Counsel (U.S.A.)
     Kevin Carome has served as general counsel of our company since January 2006. Previously, he was senior vice president and general counsel of Invesco’s U.S. Retail Business (f/k/a Invesco AimAim) from 2003 to 2005. Prior to joining Invesco, Mr. Carome worked with Liberty Financial Companies, Inc. (LFC) in Boston where he was senior vice president and general counsel from August 2000 through December 2001. He joined LFC in 1993 as associate general counsel and, from 1998 through 2000, was general counsel of certain of its investment management subsidiaries. Mr. Carome began his career as an associate at Ropes & Gray in Boston. He received a B.S. in political science and a J.D. from Boston College.
     Andrew T. S. Lo(49) Senior Managing Director and Head of Invesco Asia Pacific (China)
     Andrew Lo has served as head of Invesco Asia Pacific since February 2001. He joined our company as managing director for Invesco Asia in 1994. Mr. Lo began his career as a credit analyst at Chase Manhattan Bank in 1984. He became vice president of the investment management group at Citicorp in 1988 and was managing director of Capital House Asia from 1990 to 1994. Mr. Lo was chairman of the Hong Kong Investment Funds Association from 1996 to 1997 and a member of the Council to the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong and the Advisory Committee to the Securities and Futures Commission in Hong Kong from 1997 to 2001. He received a B.S. and an MBA from Babson College in the U.S.

117145


     Colin D. Meadows(39)(40) Senior Managing Director and Chief Administrative Officer (U.S.A.)
     Colin Meadows has served as chief administrative officer of Invesco since May 2006 with responsibility for business strategy,IT, operations, human resources, corporate communications and communications. In September 2008 he expanded his role with responsibilities for operations and technology.corporate development/M&A. Mr. Meadows came to Invesco from GE Consumer Finance where he was senior vice president of business development and mergers and acquisitions. Prior to that role, he served as senior vice president of strategic planning and technology at Wells Fargo Bank. From 1996-2003, Mr. Meadows was an associate principal with McKinsey & Company, focusing on the financial services and venture capital industries, with an emphasis in the banking and asset management sectors. Mr. Meadows received a B.A. cum laude in economics and English literature from Andrews University and a J.D. from Harvard Law School.
     James I. Robertson(51)(53) Senior Managing Director and Head of U.K. and Continental Europe; Director (U.K.)
     James Robertson has served as a member of the Board of Directors of our company since April 2004. He is currently head of Invesco Perpetual with additional responsibility for Continental Europe. He was head of Operations and Technology from 2006 to September 2008. He was chief financial officer from April 2004 to October 2005. Mr. Robertson joined our company as director of finance and corporate development for Invesco’s Global division in 1993 and repeated this role for the Pacific division in 1995. Mr. Robertson became managing director of global strategic planning in 1996 and served as chief executive officer of AMVESCAP Group Services, Inc. from 2001 to 2005. He holds an M.A. from Cambridge University and is a Chartered Accountant.
     Loren M. Starr(48)(49) Senior Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer (U.S.A.)
     Loren Starr has served as senior managing director and chief financial officer of our company since October 2005. His current responsibilities include finance, accounting, investor relations and corporate services. Previously, he served from 2001 to 2005 as senior vice president and chief financial officer of Janus Capital Group Inc., after working as head of corporate finance from 1998 to 2001 at Putnam Investments. Prior to these positions, Mr. Starr held senior corporate finance roles with Lehman Brothers and Morgan Stanley & Co. He received a B.A. in chemistry and B.S. in industrial engineering, summa cum laude, from Columbia University, as well as an MBA, also from Columbia, and M.S. in operations research from Carnegie Mellon University. Mr. Starr is a certified treasury professional. He serves as director and is a past chairman of the Association for Financial Professionals.
     Philip A. Taylor(55)(56) Senior Managing Director and Head of North American Retail (Canada)
     Philip Taylor became head of Invesco’s North American Retail business in April 2006. He had previously served as head of Invesco Trimark since January 2002. He joined Invesco Trimark in 1999 as senior vice president of operations and client services and later became executive vice president and chief operating officer. Mr. Taylor was president of Canadian retail broker Investors Group Securities from 1994 to 1997 and managing partner of Meridian Securities, an execution and clearing broker, from 1989 to 1994. He held various management positions with Royal Trust, now part of Royal Bank of Canada, from 1982 to 1989. Mr. Taylor began his career in consumer brand management in the U.S. and Canada with Richardson-Vicks, now part of Procter & Gamble. He received a Bachelor of Commerce (honors) degree from Carleton University and an MBA from the Schulich School of Business at York University. Mr. Taylor is a member of the Dean’s Advisory council of the Schulich School of Business and pastBusiness. He has been chair of the Toronto Symphony Orchestra.Orchestra and is currently on the board of the Royal Conservatory of Music.
Item 11.Item 11.Executive Compensation
     The information required by this Item will be included in the definitive Proxy Statement for the company’s annual meeting of shareholders, which will be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009,2010, and is incorporated by reference in this Report.
Item 12.Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
     The information required by this Item will be included in the definitive Proxy Statement for the company’s annual meeting of shareholders, which will be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009,2010, and is incorporated by reference in this Report.

118146


Item 13.Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
     The information required by this Item will be included in the definitive Proxy Statement for the company’s annual meeting of shareholders, which will be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009,2010, and is incorporated by reference in this Report.
Item 14.Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services
     The information required by this Item will be included in the definitive Proxy Statement for the company’s annual meeting of shareholders, which will be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009,2010, and is incorporated by reference in this Report.

119147


PART IV
Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement SchedulesItem 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedule
     (a)(1) The financial statements filed as part of this Report are listed in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
     (a)(2) No financial statement schedules are required to be filed as part of this Report because all such schedules have been omitted. Such omission has been made on the basis that information is provided in the financial statements or related footnotes in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” or is not required to be filed as the information is not applicable.
     (a)(3) The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index are included with this Report.
Exhibit Index
(Note: References herein to “AMVESCAP,” “AMVESCAP PLC” or “INVESCO PLC” are to the predecessor registrant to Invesco Ltd.)
 
3.1 Memorandum of Association of Invesco Ltd., incorporating amendments up to and including December 4, 2007, incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1 to Invesco’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 12, 2007
 
 
3.2 Amended and Restated Bye-Laws of Invesco Ltd., incorporating amendments up to and including December 4, 2007, incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.2 to Invesco’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 12, 2007
 
 
4.1 Specimen Certificate for Common Shares of Invesco Ltd., incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 to Invesco’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 12, 2007
 
 
4.2 Indenture, dated as of February 27, 2003, for AMVESCAP’s 5.375% Senior Notes Due 2013, among AMVESCAP PLC, A I M Advisors, Inc., A I M Management Group Inc., INVESCO Institutional (N.A.), Inc., INVESCO North American Holdings, Inc. and SunTrust Bank, incorporated by reference to exhibit 2.12 to AMVESCAP’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 27, 2003
 
 
4.3 Indenture, dated as of December 14, 2004, for AMVESCAP’s 5.375% Senior Notes due 2014, among AMVESCAP PLC, A I M Advisors, Inc., A I M Management Group Inc., INVESCO Institutional (N.A.), Inc., INVESCO North American Holdings, Inc. and SunTrust Bank, incorporated by reference to exhibit 2.11 to AMVESCAP’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 29, 2005
 
 
4.4 Indenture, dated as of April 11, 2007, for AMVESCAP’s 5.625% Senior Notes Due 2012, among AMVESCAP PLC, A I M Advisors, Inc., A I M Management Group Inc., INVESCO Institutional (N.A.), Inc., INVESCO North American Holdings, Inc. and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., incorporated by reference to exhibit 99.1 to AMVESCAP’s Report on Form 6-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 18, 2007
 
 
4.5 Supplemental Indenture No. 2, dated as of November 27, 2007, among INVESCO PLC, a public limited company organized under the laws of England and Wales, and formerly known as AMVESCAP PLC, A I M Advisors, Inc., A I M Management Group Inc., INVESCO Institutional (N.A.), Inc., and INVESCO North American Holdings, Inc., Invesco Ltd., a Bermuda corporation, and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.2 to Invesco’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 30, 2007

148


 
4.6 Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 27, 2007, among INVESCO PLC, a public limited company organized under the laws of England and Wales, and formerly known as AMVESCAP PLC, A I M Advisors, Inc., A I M Management Group Inc., INVESCO Institutional (N.A.), Inc., and INVESCO North American Holdings, Inc., Invesco Ltd., a Bermuda corporation, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Successor Trustee to SunTrust Bank, incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.3 to Invesco’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 30, 2007
 
 
4.7 Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 27, 2007, among INVESCO PLC, a public limited company organized under the laws of England and Wales, and formerly known as AMVESCAP PLC, A I M Advisors, Inc., A I M Management Group Inc., INVESCO Institutional (N.A.), Inc., and INVESCO North American Holdings, Inc., Invesco Ltd., a Bermuda corporation, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Successor Trustee to SunTrust Bank, incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.4 to Invesco’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 30, 2007

120


 
4.8 Supplemental Indenture No. 3, dated as of June 9, 2009, for the 5.625% Senior Notes due 2012, among Invesco Holding Company Limited (f/k/a AMVESCAP PLC), IVZ, Inc., and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.8 to Invesco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 26, 2010
 
 
4.9 Supplemental Indenture No. 2, dated as of June 9, 2009, for the 5.375% Senior Notes due 2013, among Invesco Holding Company Limited (f/k/a AMVESCAP PLC), IVZ, Inc., and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor trustee to SunTrust Bank., incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.9 to Invesco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 26, 2010
 
 
4.10 Supplemental Indenture No. 2, dated as of June 9, 2009, for the 5.375% Senior Notes due 2014, among Invesco Holding Company Limited (f/k/a AMVESCAP PLC), IVZ, Inc., and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor trustee to SunTrust Bank.Bank, incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.10 to Invesco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 26, 2010
 
 
4.11 Guarantee, dated February 27, 2003, with respect to AMVESCAP’s 5.375% Senior Notes Due 2013, made by A I M Management Group Inc., A I M Advisors, Inc., INVESCO Institutional (N.A.), Inc. and INVESCO North American Holdings, Inc., incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.20 to AMVESCAP’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 27, 2003
 
 
10.1 Credit Agreement, dated as of June 9, 2009, among IVZ, Inc., Invesco Ltd., the banks, financial institutions and other institutional lenders from time to time a party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to Invesco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 26, 2010
 10.2Credit Agreement, dated as of May 24, 2010, among Invesco Holding Company Limited, IVZ, Inc., Invesco Ltd., the banks, financial institutions and other institutional lenders from time to time a party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to Invesco’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 2, 2010
 
10.210.3 Third Amended and Restated Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of August 18, 2003, among Citibank, N.A., Citicorp North America, Inc., A I M Management Group Inc., A I M Distributors, Inc., A I M Advisors, Inc. and Invesco Funds Group, Inc., incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to Invesco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2008
 
 
10.310.4 Amendment No. 4 to Facility Documents, dated as of August 24, 2001 among A I M Management Group Inc., A I M Advisors, Inc., A I M Distributors, Inc., Citibank, N.A., Bankers Trust Company and Citicorp North America, Inc., incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.4 to AMVESCAP’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2001, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 4, 2002
 
 
10.410.5 Amendment No. 5 to Facility Documents, dated as of August 18, 2003, among Invesco Funds Group, Inc., A I M Management Group Inc., A I M Advisors, Inc., A I M Distributors, Inc., Citibank, N.A., Citicorp North America, Inc. and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.4 to Invesco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2008

149


 
10.510.6 Global Stock Plan, as amended and restated as of as of April 1, 2009, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to Invesco’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 8, 2009
 
 
10.610.7 Invesco Ltd. 2008 Global Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.6 to Invesco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 27, 2009
 
 10.8Amendment No. 1 to the Invesco Ltd. 2008 Global Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective February 1, 2009, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to Invesco’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 2, 2010
 
10.710.9Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement — Time Vesting under the Invesco Ltd. 2008 Global Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to Invesco’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 7, 2008
10.10Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement — Time Vesting under the Invesco Ltd. 2008 Global Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.3 to Invesco’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 7, 2008
10.11Form of Award Agreement for Non-Executive Directors under the Invesco Ltd. 2008 Global Equity Incentive Plan
10.12Invesco Ltd. 2010 Global Equity Incentive Plan (ST), effective May 18, 2010
10.13Amendment No. 1, effective July 30, 2010, to the Invesco Ltd. 2010 Global Equity Incentive Plan (ST), incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to Invesco’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 2, 2010
10.14 Invesco Ltd. Executive Incentive Bonus Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.7 to Invesco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 27, 2009
 
 
10.810.15 Invesco Ltd. Amended and Restated 2005 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan, effective as of January 1, 2009, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.8 to Invesco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 27, 2009
 
 
10.910.16 No. 3 Executive Share Option Scheme, as revised as of August 2006, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.6 to Invesco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2008
 
 
10.1010.17 2000 Share Option Plan, as revised as of January 26, 2005, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.7 to Invesco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2008
 
 
10.1110.18 Invesco ESOP, as amended and restated, generally effective as of February 1, 2005, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.8 to Invesco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2008

121


 
10.1210.19 2003 Share Option Plan (Canada), dated June 2003, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.10 to Invesco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2008
 
10.1310.20 Deferred Fees Share Plan, as amended and restated effective December 10, 2008, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.13 to Invesco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 27, 2009
 
 
10.1410.21 Rules of the AMVESCAP International Sharesave Plan, dated May 8, 1997, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.12 to Invesco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2008
 
10.15Amended and Restated Master Employment Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2008, among Invesco Ltd., Invesco Holding Company Limited (f/k/a INVESCO PLC) and Martin L. Flanagan, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.15 to Invesco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 27, 2009
 
10.1610.22 Global Partner Agreement, dated November 10, 2005, between AMVESCAP PLC and Loren M. Starr, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.14 to Invesco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2008

150


 
10.1710.23 Global Partner Agreement, dated January 1, 2001, between AIM Funds Management Inc. and Philip A. Taylor, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.15 to Invesco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2008
 
 
10.1810.24 Global Partners Employment Contract, dated April 1, 2000, between INVESCO Pacific Holdings Limited and Andrew Lo, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.17 to Invesco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2008
 
 
10.1910.25 Global Partner Agreement, dated January 3, 2001, between James I. Robertson and AMVESCAP Group Services, Inc., incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.16 to AMVESCAP’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 29, 2005
 
 10.26Description of Material Employment Terms for G. Mark Armour, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to Invesco’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 2, 2010
 
10.2010.27 Transaction Agreement, dated as of October 19, 2009, between Morgan Stanley and Invesco Ltd., incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to Invesco’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 20, 2009, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 30, 2009
 
 
1610.28 Letter,Amendment, dated January 17, 2008, from Ernst & Young LLP (UK)as of May 28, 2010, to the Commission,Transaction Agreement, dated as of October 19, 2009, between Morgan Stanley and Invesco Ltd., incorporated by reference to exhibit 1610.2 to Invesco’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 18, 2008June 2, 2010
 
 
21 List of Subsidiaries
 
 
23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, dated February 26, 201025, 2011
 
 
31.1 Certification of Martin L. Flanagan pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
31.2 Certification of Loren M. Starr pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
32.1 Certification of Martin L. Flanagan pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
32.2 Certification of Loren M. Starr pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

122151


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
       
  Invesco Ltd.  
       
  By: /s/MARTIN L. FLANAGAN
  
  Name: Martin L. Flanagan  
  Title: President and Chief Executive Officer  
       
  Date: February 26, 201025, 2011  
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated and on the dates indicated.
     
Name Title Date
/s/ MARTIN L. FLANAGAN
 
Martin L. Flanagan
 Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and President; Director February 26, 201025, 2011
     
/s/ LOREN M. STARR
 
Loren M. Starr
 Senior Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) February 26, 201025, 2011
     
/s/ DAVID A. HARTLEY
 
David A. Hartley
 Group Controller and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) February 26, 201025, 2011
     
/s/ REX D. ADAMS
Rex D. Adams
 Chairman and Director February 26, 2010
Rex D. Adams
25, 2011 
     
/s/ SIR JOHN BANHAM
DirectorFebruary 26, 2010
 
Sir John Banham
 Director February 25, 2011 
     
/s/ JOSEPH R. CANION
DirectorFebruary 26, 2010
 
Joseph R. Canion
 Director February 25, 2011 
     
/s/ BEN F. JOHNSON, III
DirectorFebruary 26, 2010
 
Ben F. Johnson, III
 Director February 25, 2011 
     
/s/ DENIS KESSLER Director February 26, 201025, 2011
 
Denis Kessler
    
     
/s/ EDWARD P. LAWRENCE
DirectorFebruary 26, 2010
 
Edward P. Lawrence
 Director February 25, 2011 
     
/s/ J. THOMAS PRESBY
DirectorFebruary 26, 2010
 
J. Thomas Presby
 Director February 25, 2011 
     
/s/ JAMES I. ROBERTSON
DirectorFebruary 26, 2010
 
James I. Robertson
 Director February 25, 2011 
     
/s/ PHOEBE A. WOOD
DirectorFebruary 26, 2010
 
Phoebe A. Wood
 Director February 25, 2011 

123152