UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   
(Mark One)
þ
 ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
2008
or
o
 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission FileNo. 0-25370
 
Rent-A-Center, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
   
Delaware45-0491516

(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 45-0491516
(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)

Identification No.)
5700 Tennyson Parkway,
Suite 100
5501 Headquarters Drive
Plano, Texas 75024
972-801-1100
(Address, including zip code and telephone number,
including area code, of registrant’s
principal executive offices)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:972-801-1100
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:None
Title of Each Class
Name of Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
The Nasdaq Global Select Market, Inc.
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, par value $.01 per shareNone
(Title of Class)
 
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes þ     No o
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.  Yes o     No þ
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o
 
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 ofRegulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of thisForm 10-K or any amendment to thisForm 10-K.  þo
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.smaller reporting company. See definitionthe definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filerfiler” and large accelerated filer”“smaller reporting company” in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
 
Large accelerated filer þþAccelerated filer o          Non-accelerated filer oNon-accelerated filer oSmaller reporting company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o     No þ
Aggregate market value of the 72,471,232 shares of Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant at the closing sales price as reported on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System — National Market System on June 30, 2005$1,687,854,993
Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of the close of business on March 8, 2006:69,243,331
     
Aggregate market value of the 58,202,180 shares of Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant at the closing sales price as reported on The Nasdaq Global Select Market, Inc. on June 30, 2008 $1,197,218,843 
Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of the close of business on February 20, 2009:  65,986,784 
Documents incorporated by reference:
 
Portions of the definitive proxy statement relating to the 20062009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders ofRent-A-Center, Inc. are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.
 


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
       
    Page
 
PART I
  Business  1 
  Risk Factors  13 
  Unresolved Staff Comments  1716 
  Properties  1716 
  Legal Proceedings  17 
  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders  2117 
 
PART II
  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities  2218 
  Selected Financial Data  2320 
  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations  2523 
  Quantitative and Qualitative DisclosureDisclosures about Market Risk  4239 
  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data  4341 
  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure  7773 
  Controls and Procedures  7773 
  Other Information  7773 
 
PART III
  Directors, and Executive Officers of the Registrantand Corporate Governance  7773 
  Executive Compensation  7773 
  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters  7773 
  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence  7773 
  Principal Accountant Fees and Services  7773 
PART IV
PART IV
  Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules  7874 
 Form of Stock Compensation AgreementEX-10.13
 Form of Long-Term Incentive Cash AwardEX-10.25
 Form of Loyalty and Confidentiality AgreementEX-10.30
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmEX-21.1
 Certification Pursuant to Section 302EX-23.1
 Certification Pursuant to Section 302EX-31.1
 Certification Pursuant to Section 906EX-31.2
 Certification Pursuant to Section 906EX-32.1
EX-32.2


i

i


PART I
Item 1.Business.
Overview
 
Unless the context indicates otherwise, references to “we,” “us” and “our” refers to the consolidated business operations ofRent-A-Center, Inc., the parent, and all of its direct and indirect subsidiaries.
 
We are the largest operator in the United Statesrent-to-own rent-to-own industry with an approximate 33%38% market share based on store count. At December 31, 2005,2008, we operated 2,7603,037 company-owned stores nationwide and in Canada and Puerto Rico, including 2131 retail installment sales stores in Wisconsin operated by our subsidiary Get It Now, LLC under the namenames “Get It Now” and seven“Home Choice” and eight rent-to-own stores located in Canada operated by our subsidiaryRent-A-Centre, Ltd.,operating under the name “Rent-A-Centre.“Rent-A-Centre. One of our other subsidiaries, Our subsidiary, ColorTyme, Inc., is a national franchisor ofrent-to-own rent-to-own stores. At December 31, 2005,2008, ColorTyme had 296222 franchised rent-to-own stores in 38 states, 288 of which operated under the ColorTyme name and eight of which operated under theRent-A-Center name.34 states. These franchise stores represent an additional 4%3% market share based on store count.
 
Our stores generally offer high quality, durable products such as major consumer electronics, appliances, computers and furniture and accessories under flexible rental purchase agreements that generally allow the customer to obtain ownership of the merchandise at the conclusion of an agreed upon rental period. TheseThe rental purchase agreements are designed to appeal totransaction is a wide variety of customers by allowing themflexible alternative for consumers to obtain the use and enjoyment of brand name merchandise that they might otherwise be unable to obtain due to insufficient cash resources or a lackwithout incurring debt. Key features of access to credit. These agreements also cater to customers who only have a temporary need or who simply desire to rent rather thanthe rental purchase the merchandise. Get It Now offers our merchandise on an installment sales basis in Wisconsin. transaction include:
• convenient payment options — in-store or over the phone;
• no long-term obligations;
• right to terminate without penalty;
• no requirement of a credit history;
• set-up and delivery included at no additional charge;
• product maintenance;
• lifetime reinstatement; and
• flexible options to obtain ownership — 90 days same as cash, early purchase options, or payment through the term of the agreement.
We offer well known brands such as Sony, Philips, LG, Hitachi, JVC, Toshiba and Mitsubishi home electronics, Whirlpool appliances, Dell, CompaqToshiba, Sony, Hewlett-Packard and Hewlett-PackardDell computers and Ashley, England Berkline and StandardKlaussner furniture. We also offer high levels of customer service, including repair, pickup and delivery, generally at no additional charge. Our customers benefit from the ability to return merchandise at any time without further obligation and make payments that build toward ownership. We estimate that approximately 70%75% of our business is from repeat customers.
 
We also offer financial services products, such as short term secured and unsecured loans, debit cards, check cashing, tax preparation and money transfer services, in some of our existing rent-to-own stores under the trade names “RAC Financial Services” and “Cash AdvantEdge.” As of December 31, 2008, we offered some or all of these financial services products in 351Rent-A-Center store locations in 18 states.
We were incorporated in Delaware in 1986. Our principal executive offices are located at 5700 Tennyson Parkway, Suite 100,5501 Headquarters Drive, Plano, Texas 75024. Our telephone number is(972) 801-1100 and our company website is www.rentacenter.com. We do not intend for information contained on our website to be part of thisForm 10-K. We make available free of charge on or through our website our annual report onForm 10-K, our quarterly reports onForm 10-Q, our current reports onForm 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. Additionally, we voluntarily will provide electronic or paper copies of our filings free of charge upon request.


1


Industry Overview
 
According to the Association of Progressive Rental Organizations, therent-to-own rent-to-own industry in the United States of Americaand Canada consists of approximately 8,3008,500 stores and providesserves approximately 6.9 million products to over 2.73.0 million households. We estimate that the threetwo largestrent-to-own rent-to-own industry participants account for approximately 4,7004,800 of the total number of stores, and the majority of the remainder of the industry consists of operations with fewer than 2050 stores. Therent-to-own rent-to-own industry is highly fragmented and due primarily to the decreased availability of traditional financing sources, has experienced and we believe will continue to experience, increasingsignificant consolidation. We believe this consolidation trend in the industry presentswill continue, presenting opportunities for us to continue to acquire additional stores or customer accounts on favorable terms.
 
Therent-to-own rent-to-own industry serves a highly diverse customer base. According to the Association of Progressive Rental Organizations, approximately 73% ofrent-to-own rent-to-own customers have household incomes between $15,000 and $50,000 per year. ManyThe rent-to-own industry serves a wide variety of the customers served by the industry do not haveallowing them to obtain merchandise that they might otherwise be unable to obtain due to insufficient cash resources or a lack of access to significant amounts of credit. For these customers, therent-to-own industry provides an alternative for them to obtain

1


brand name products. The Association of Progressive Rental Organizations also estimates that 95% of customers have high school diplomas. According to an April 2000 Federal Trade Commission study, 75% ofrent-to-own rent-to-own customers were satisfied with their experience withrent-to-own rent-to-own transactions.
The study noted that customers gave a wide variety of reasons for their satisfaction, including “the ability to obtain merchandise they otherwise could not,not; the low payments,payments; the lack of a credit check,check; the convenience and flexibility of the transaction,transaction; the quality of the merchandise,merchandise; the quality of the maintenance, delivery, and other services,services; the friendliness and flexibility of the store employees,employees; and the lack of any problems or hassles.”
StrategyHistorical Growth
 
From 1993 to 2006, we pursued an aggressive growth strategy in which we sought to acquire underperforming rent-to-own stores to which we could apply our operating model as well as open new stores. Since March 1993, our company-owned store base has grown from 27 to 3,037 at December 31, 2008, primarily through acquisitions, including the acquisition in November 2006 of Rent-Way, Inc. (“Rent-Way”), which operated 782 stores in 34 states. During this period, we acquired over 3,600 stores, including approximately 400 of our franchised stores. These acquisitions occurred in approximately 240 separate transactions, including ten transactions where we acquired in excess of 50 stores. In addition, we strategically opened or acquired stores near market areas served by existing stores (“cannibalized”) to enhance service levels, gain incremental sales and increase market penetration.
The following table summarizes the store growth activity over the last three fiscal years:
             
  
2008
  
2007
  
2006
 
 
Stores at beginning of period  3,081   3,406   2,760 
New store openings  26   27   40 
Acquired stores remaining open  5   14   646 
Closed stores(1)
            
Merged with existing stores  45   363   25 
Sold or closed with no surviving store  30   3   15 
             
Stores at end of period  3,037   3,081   3,406 
             
Acquired stores closed and accounts merged with existing stores  38   36   164 
Total approximate purchase price of acquisitions  $15.7 million   $20.1 million   $657.4 million 
(1)Substantially all of the merged, sold or closed stores in 2008 and 2007 relate to our store consolidation plans discussed below and in more detail in Note F, Restructuring, in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 59.
Store Consolidation.We believe our aggressive store acquisition program and our planned cannibalization resulted in over penetration in some markets. We continually evaluate every market in which we operate by reviewing operating results, competitive positioning, and growth potential. As a result of such review in December 2007, we committed to a store consolidation plan pursuant to which we closed or merged 282 stores as of December 31, 2008.


2


Future Store Growth.  We continue to believe there are currentlyattractive opportunities to expand our presence in the rent-to-own industry both nationally and internationally. We plan to continue opening new stores in targeted markets and acquiring existing rent-to-own stores and store account portfolios. We will focus new market penetration in adjacent areas or regions that we believe are underserved by the rent-to-own industry. In addition, we intend to pursue our acquisition strategy of targeting under-performing and under-capitalized rent-to-own stores. We also intend to continue to critically evaluate the markets in which we operate and will close, sell or merge underperforming stores.
Competitive Strengths
We believe the following competitive strengths position us well for continued growth:
Geographic Footprint.  At December 31, 2008, we operated 3,037 stores nationwide and in Canada and Puerto Rico. In addition, our subsidiary, ColorTyme, franchised 222 stores in 34 states. We believe the number and location of our stores combined with the strength of our brand provides us with a unique platform from which to market additional products and services to our customer demographic. The following table shows the geographic distribution of our stores:
             
  Number of Stores 
  Company
  With Financial
    
Location
 Owned  Services  Franchised 
 
Alabama  60      5 
Alaska  6   5   4 
Arizona  58   6    
Arkansas  39      1 
California  139      5 
Colorado  44   13   1 
Connecticut  40      1 
Delaware  20       
District of Columbia  4       
Florida  188      20 
Georgia  88      12 
Hawaii  11   7   5 
Idaho  11   6   3 
Illinois  110     8 
Indiana  101      4 
Iowa  27   11    
Kansas  34   13   8 
Kentucky  67   20   3 
Louisiana  45      5 
Maine  28      9 
Maryland  65      11 
Massachusetts  69      1 
Michigan  104      9 
Minnesota  4*      
Mississippi  35      1 
Missouri  65   16    
Montana  9   5    
Nebraska  14   1    
Nevada  23   4    
New Hampshire  20      1 
New Jersey  44       
New Mexico  26   10   9 
New York  178      3 
North Carolina  133      15 
North Dakota  3       
Ohio  183   51   4 
Oklahoma  44      6 
Oregon  27      4 
Pennsylvania  152      3 
Puerto Rico  43       
Rhode Island  16      2 
South Carolina  67      6 
South Dakota  4       
Tennessee  91   37   4 
Texas  292   113   35 
Utah  16   8    
Vermont  9       
Virginia  70      11 
Washington  44   25   3 
West Virginia  33       
Wisconsin  21*      
Wyoming  5       
Canada  8       
             
TOTAL  3,037   351   222 
*Retail installment stores
Includes six retail installment stores


3


Management Expertise.  Our management team at both the corporate and operational levels is highly experienced and motivated. Our executive management team has extensive experience in the rent-to-own industry with over 100 combined years of service with us and has demonstrated the ability to grow our business through their operational leadership and strategic vision.
Financial Strength.  Historically, our operations have generated strong cash flow, averaging $210.2 million in operating cash flow per year since 1998. As a result, we have been able to invest in acquisitions and new business opportunities while maintaining a strong balance sheet.
Collections.  The breadth of our store locations also provides us with the operational infrastructure to support our collection efforts. The ability to timely and personally contact customers through our local field personnel is critical to our ability to collect payments or regain possession of rented merchandise. In addition, we believe we have developed lasting relationships with our customers, as well as obtained extensive knowledge of our targeted customer demographic, through our collection experience.
Integration Experience.  We have gained significant experience in the acquisition and integration of other rent-to-own operators and believe the fragmented nature of the rent-to-own industry will result in ongoing consolidation opportunities. Acquired stores benefit from our improved product mix, sophisticated management information system, purchasing power and administrative network.
Strategy
We intend to capitalize on our competitive strengths and continue to build our position as a leading provider of products and services to cash and credit constrained consumers by focusing our strategic efforts on:on the following:
 • enhancing the operations, revenue and profitability inof our store locations;
 
 • opening newseeking additional distribution channels for our products and acquiring existingrent-to-own stores;services;
 
 • expandingleveraging our financial services business within our existing store locations;strength; and
 
 • building our national brand.
Enhancing Store Operationsstrengthening customer relationships through community involvement.
 
Enhancing the Operations, Revenue and Profitability of Our Store Locations
We continually seek to improve store performance through strategies intended to produce gains in operating efficiency, revenue and profitability. For example, we continue to focus our operational personnel on prioritizing store profit growth, including the effective pricing of rental merchandiseincreasing store revenue and the management ofmanaging store level operating expenses.
 
We believe we will achieve further gains in revenues and operating margins in both existing and newly acquired stores by continuing to:
 • use consumer focused advertising, including direct mail, television, radio and print media, while also utilizing new business relationships and strategic allianceswhich highlights the appealing features of our services to increase store traffic and expand our customer base;
• focus on the customer experience, both in our store locations, as well as on our website;
• focus on improving the operations in our existing financial services store locations;
• respond to competitive pressures on a market by market basis with specifically tailored action plans;
• acquire customer accounts;
 
 • expand the offering of product lines to appeal to more customers to increase the number of product rentalstransactions and grow our customer base;
• expand our financial services business within our existing store locations;
 
 • evaluate other growth strategies, including the entry into additional lines of business offering products and services designed to appeal to our customer demographic;
 
 • employ strict store-level cost control;
 
 • analyze and evaluate store operations against key performance indicators; and
 
 • use a revenue and profit based incentive pay plan.


4

Opening New and Acquiring Existing Rent-To-Own Stores
      We intend to expand our business both by opening new stores in targeted markets and by acquiring existingrent-to-own stores and store account portfolios. We will focus new market penetration in adjacent areas or regions that we believe are underserved by therent-to-own industry, which we believe represents a significant opportunity for us. In addition, we intend to pursue our acquisition strategy of targeting under-performing and under-capitalized chains ofrent-to-own stores. We have gained significant experience in the acquisition and integration of otherrent-to-own operators and believe the fragmented nature of therent-to-own industry will result in ongoing consolidation opportunities. Acquired stores benefit from our improved product mix, sophisticated management information system, purchasing power and administrative network. In addition, we have potential access to our ColorTyme franchise locations, possessing the right of first refusal to purchase such franchise locations.

2


      Since March 1993, our company-owned store base has grown from 27 to 2,760 at December 31, 2005, primarily through acquisitions. During this period, we acquired over 2,500 company-owned stores
Seeking Additional Distribution Channels for Our Products and over 380 franchised stores in approximately 160 separate transactions, including nine transactions where we acquired in excess of 50 stores.Services
 The following table summarizes the store growth activity over the last three fiscal years:
              
  2005 2004 2003
       
Stores at beginning of period  2,875   2,648   2,407 
New store openings  67   94   101 
Acquired stores remaining open  44   191   160 
Closed stores(1)
            
 Merged with existing stores  170   48   20 
 Sold or closed with no surviving store  56   10    — 
          
Stores at end of period  2,760   2,875   2,648 
          
Acquired stores closed and accounts merged with existing stores  39   111   220 
Total approximate purchase price of acquisitions $38.3  million  $195.2 million(2) $126.1 million 
(1)Substantially all of the merged, sold or closed stores in 2005 relate to our store consolidation plan discussed in more detail on p. 30.
(2)The total purchase price includes non-cash consideration of approximately $23.8 million in common stock issued and approximately $6.1 million in fair value assigned to the stock options assumed in connection with the acquisition of Rent Rite, Inc.
2003 Acquisitions. In February 2003, we acquired substantially all of the assets of 295 stores located throughout the United States from Rent-Way, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries for approximately $100.4 million in cash. Of the 295 stores, 176 were merged with existing locations.
2004 Acquisitions. On March 5, 2004, we completed the purchase of five Canadianrent-to-own stores for $3.2 million Canadian dollars ($2.4 million U.S. dollars). The five stores are located in the cities of Edmonton and Calgary in the province of Alberta. This acquisition marked the commencement of our business operations in Canada and internationally.
      On May 7, 2004, we completed the acquisition of Rent Rite, Inc. for an aggregate purchase price of $59.9 million. Rent Rite operated 90 stores in 11 states, of which we merged 26 stores with our existing store locations. Approximately 40% of the consideration was paid with our common stock, with the remaining portion consisting of cash, the assumption of Rent Rite’s stock options and retirement of Rent Rite’s outstanding debt.
      On May 14, 2004, we completed the acquisition of Rainbow Rentals, Inc. for an aggregate purchase price of $109.0 million. Rainbow Rentals operated 124 stores in 15 states, of which we merged 29 stores with our existing store locations. We funded the acquisition entirely with cash on hand.
2005 Store Consolidation. In 2005, we critically evaluated every market in which we operate based on market share, operating results, competitive positioning, and growth potential. As a result, we closed or merged 114 stores and sold 35 stores during the third and fourth quarters of 2005.
2006 Acquisitions. Since December 31, 2005, we have acquired two additional stores and additional accounts from three locations for approximately $2.3 million and opened an additional nine new stores. We also closed nine stores, merging seven of them with existing stores and selling two, resulting in a total store count of 2,762 at March 8, 2006.
      We continue to believe there are attractive opportunities to expand our presence in therent-to-own industry both nationally and internationally. We intend to increase the number ofrent-to-own stores in which we operate by an average of approximately 5% per year over the next several years. We plan to accomplish our future growth through both selective and opportunistic acquisitions and new store development.

3


Expanding Our Financial Services Business
      In 2005, we began offering an array of financial services in addition to traditionalrent-to-own products in our existingrent-to-own stores. These financial services include, but are not limited to, short term, secured and unsecured loans, bill paying, debit cards, check cashing and money transfer services. We believe that traditional financial services providers ineffectively market to our customer base and that an opportunity exists for us to leverageobtain new customers through sources other than our knowledge of this demographic, as well as our operational infrastructure, into a complementary line of business offering financial services designed to appeal to our customer demographic. As of December 31, 2005, 40 locations in the northwestern United States were offering some or all of these financial services. Weexisting rent-to-own stores. Through agreements with other retailers, we intend to offer these financial services in 140the rent-to-own transaction to 200 existingRent-A-Center store locations byconsumers who do not qualify for financing from such retailer, offering the end of 2006.consumer the opportunity to obtain the merchandise they want or need. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in our efforts to expand our operations to includedistribution channels by entering into such complementary financial services,agreements with other retailers, or that such operations, should they be added, will prove to be profitable.
Leveraging our Financial Strength
We believe we can leverage our financial strength by investing significantly in people, processes and technology to reduce our cost infrastructure. We are focused on lowering operating expenses through our investments in centralized inventory purchasing, centralized procurement, and enhanced information management systems. We believe the creation of a centralized inventory purchasing system will allow us to better manage our inventory at the store level while expanding availability of the most popular products. The development of an on-line procurement tool and careful review of our processes has allowed us to reduce many of our store-level expenses. We believe our financial strength allows us to pursue these and other initiatives while also making strategic use of our cash to enhance our balance sheet.
Strengthening Customer Relationships through Community Involvement
We seek to further strengthen relationships with our customers through community involvement both at the local store level and as a company through corporate donations and initiatives. We encourage the management of each of our stores to involve themselves with their respective local communities. In addition, we participate in various programs, including the following:
Building• Since 2002, co-workers at our headquarters facility in Plano, Texas have worked to fight hunger through the North Texas Food Bank. On a national basis, we have committed $500,000 over four years in the fight to end hunger.
• Each spring, we raise funds for Big Brothers Big Sisters of America. With a donation of $1 or more, customers, co-workers and the community sign their name on a paper spring egg to hang in our stores. Since 2003, we have donated more than $1.4 million.
• In 2004, we established the Make A Difference Scholarship which provides $50,000 annually to customers, their children and our co-workers’ children who are pursuing an undergraduate degree at the college or university of their choice.
• Since 2005, we have teamed up with Boys & Girls Clubs to furnish special “RAC” Rooms to the centers that need them most. Each year, we create 20 new RAC Rooms around the country. Clubs choose the merchandise they need, including furniture, televisions, electronics and computers.
• We pledged $800,000 over four years in grants to Junior Achievement offices in communities across the U.S. as part of our commitment to promoting financial literacy in our communities. Our National Brandprogram with Junior Achievement assures that financial literacy programs will be taught to children in grades K-12 in schools where at least 51% of students qualify for free or reduced lunch.
• Random Acts of Caring brings unexpected gifts to people and organizations that serve others. Examples include furnishing rooms in three fire stations in New York and donating $5,000 to the FDNY Foundation, and providing Summit Academy, a school for children with special learning needs in Warren, Ohio, with six computers and two HDTV’s.
      We have implemented strategies to increase our name recognition and enhance our national brand. As part of that strategy, we utilize television and radio commercials, print, direct response and in-store signage, all of which are designed to increase our name recognition among our customers and potential customers. In 2005, we also continued to pursue strategic alliances and other sponsorship opportunities, which we believe will further enhance our name recognition. We believe that as theRent-A-Center name gains familiarity and national recognition through our advertising efforts, we will continue to educate the customer about therent-to-own alternative to merchandise purchases as well as solidify our reputation as a leading provider of high quality branded merchandise and services.


5

4


Our StoresRent-A-Center Store Operations
 At December 31, 2005, we operated 2,760 stores nationwide and in Canada and Puerto Rico. In addition, our subsidiary ColorTyme franchised 296 stores in 38 states. This information is illustrated by the following table:
                           
  Number of Stores   Number of Stores
       
  Company With Financial     Company With Financial  
Location Owned Services Franchised Location Owned Services Franchised
               
Alabama  60      5  Nebraska  9    —    
Alaska  6      1  Nevada  22   3   4 
Arizona  56      7  New Hampshire  14      2 
Arkansas  35      1  New Jersey  43      4 
California  150      5  New Mexico  17      10 
Colorado  39      1  New York  128      13 
Connecticut  37      3  North Carolina  111      11 
Delaware  18        North Dakota  2       
District of Columbia  4        Ohio  175      6 
Florida  173      19  Oklahoma  42      14 
Georgia  106      14  Oregon  31   5   3 
Hawaii  12      4  Pennsylvania  126      3 
Idaho  11   7   2  Puerto Rico  30       
Illinois  110      8  Rhode Island  17      1 
Indiana  102      7  South Carolina  43      7 
Iowa  24        South Dakota  5       
Kansas  31      17  Tennessee  94      1 
Kentucky  44      1  Texas  261      59 
Louisiana  29      6  Utah  15   4    
Maine  25      9  Vermont  7       
Maryland  63      9  Virginia  54      10 
Massachusetts  60      2  Washington  46   16   2 
Michigan  107      17  West Virginia  22       
Minnesota  4        Wisconsin  21*      
Mississippi  28      2  Wyoming  5       
Missouri  70      6  Alberta, Canada  7      
                        
Montana  9   5     TOTAL  2,760   40   296 
Store Design
 
Represents stores operated by Get It Now, LLC, one of our subsidiaries.
† Represents stores operated by Rent-A-Centre, Ltd., one of our subsidiaries.
Our stores average approximately 4,6004,700 square feet and are located primarily in strip centers. Because we utilize “just in time” inventory strategies, and receivereceiving merchandise shipments in relatively small quantities directly from vendors, we are able to dedicate approximately 75% of the store space to showroom floor, and also eliminate warehousing costs.
Rent-A-Center Store Operations
Product Selection
Product Selection
 
Our stores generally offer merchandise from four basic product categories: major consumer electronics, appliances, computers and furniture and accessories. Although we seek to ensure our stores maintain sufficient inventory in our stores to offer customers a wide variety of models, styles and brands, we generally limit inventory to prescribed levels to ensuremaintain strict inventory controls. We seek to provide a wide variety of high quality

5


merchandise to our customers, and we emphasize high-end products from name-brand manufacturers. For the year ended December 31, 2005, furniture and accessories2008, consumer electronic products accounted for approximately 38%35% of our store rental revenue, consumer electronic productsfurniture and accessories for 34%,33% and appliances for 16% and computers for 12%.16% each. Customers may request either new merchandise or previously rented merchandise. Previously rented merchandise is generally offered at the same weekly or monthly rental rate as is offered for new merchandise, but with an opportunity to obtain ownership of the merchandise after fewer rental payments.
 
Major consumer electronic products offered by our stores include high definition televisions, home theatre systems, video game consoles and stereos from top name-brand manufacturers such as Sony, Nintendo, Philips, LG, Hitachi, JVC, Toshiba and Mitsubishi. We offer major appliances manufactured by Whirlpool, including refrigerators, washing machines, dryers, microwave ovens, freezers and ranges. We offer personaldesktop and laptop computers from Dell, CompaqToshiba, Sony, Hewlett Packard and Hewlett Packard.Dell. We offer a variety of furniture products, including dining room, living room and bedroom furniture featuring a number of styles, materials and colors. We offer furniture made by Ashley, England Berkline and StandardKlaussner and other top name-brand manufacturers. Accessories include pictures, lamps and tables and are typically rented as part of a package of items, such as a complete room of furniture. Showroom displays enable customers to visualize how the product will look in their homes and provide a showcase for accessories.
Rental Purchase Agreements
Rental Purchase Agreements
 
Our customers generally enter into weekly, semi-monthly or monthly rental purchase agreements, which renew automatically upon receipt of each payment. We retain title to the merchandise during the term of the rental purchase agreement. Ownership of the merchandise generally transfers to the customer if the customer has continuously renewed the rental purchase agreement for a period of 7seven to 3630 months, depending upon the product type, or exercises a specified early purchase option. Although weWe do not conduct a formal credit investigation of each customer,customer. We do require a potential customer mustto provide store management with sufficient personal information to allow us to verify their residence and sources of income. References listed by the customer are also contacted to verify the information contained in the customer’s rental purchase order form. Rental payments are generally made in the store inor by telephone. We accept cash byand credit card or debit card.cards. Approximately 86% of our customers payagreements are on a weekly basis.term. Depending on state regulatory requirements, we may charge for the reinstatement of terminated accounts or collect a delinquent account fee, and collect loss/damage waiver fees from customers desiring product protection in case of theft or certain natural disasters. These fees are standard in the industry and may be subject to government-specified limits. Please read the section entitled “— Government Regulation.”
Product Turnover
Product Turnover
 
On average, a minimum rental term of 18 months is generally required to obtain ownership of new merchandise. We believe that only approximatelyApproximately 25% of our initial rental purchase agreements are taken to the full term of the agreement. The average total life for each product is approximately 1920 months, which includes the initial rental period, all re-rental periods and idle time in our system. Turnover varies significantly based on the type of merchandise rented, with certain consumer electronics products, such as camcorders and DVD players and recorders, generally rented for shorter periods, while appliances and furniture are generally rented for longer periods. To cover the relatively high operating expenses generated by greater product turnover, rental purchase agreements require higher aggregate payments than are generally charged under other types of purchase plans, such as installment purchase or credit plans.


6


Customer Service
Customer Service
 
We generally offer same day or24-hour delivery and installation of our merchandise at no additional cost to the customer. We provide any required service or repair without additional charge, except for damage in excess of normal wear and tear. Repair services are provided through our national network of 2324 service centers, the cost of which may be reimbursed by the vendor if the item is still under factory warranty. If the product cannot be repaired at the customer’s residence, we provide a temporary replacement while the product is being repaired. TheGenerally, the customer is fully liable for damage, loss or destruction of the merchandise, unless the

6


customer purchases an optional loss/damage waiver covering the particular loss. Most of the products we offer are covered by a manufacturer’s warranty for varying periods which, subject to the terms of the warranty, is transferred to the customer in the event that the customer obtains ownership.
Collections
Collections
 
Store managers use our management information system to track collections on a daily basis. For fiscal years 2005, 2004,2008, 2007, and 2003,2006, the average week ending past due percentages were 6.76%6.38%, 6.57%6.43% and 6.55%6.58%, respectively. Our goal was to have no more than 5.99%, 5.99% and 6.50% of our rental agreements past due one day or more each Saturday evening in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.the three years. For the 20062009 fiscal year, our goal remains the same as in 2005 at 5.99%. If a customer fails to make a rental payment when due, store personnel will attempt to contact the customer to obtain payment and reinstate the agreement, or will terminate the account and arrange to regain possession of the merchandise. We attempt to recover the rental items as soon as possible following termination or default of a rental purchase agreement, generally by the seventh day. Collection efforts are enhanced by the numerous personal and job-related references required of customers, the personal nature of the relationships between store employees and customers and the fact that, following a period in which a customer is temporarily unable to make payments on a piece of rental merchandise and must return the merchandise, that customer generally may re-rent a piece of merchandise of similar type and age on the terms the customer enjoyed prior to that period.
 
Pursuant to the rental purchase agreements, customers who become delinquent in their rental payments and fail to return the rented merchandise are or may over time become liable for accrued rent through the date the merchandise is finally returned or the amount of the early purchase option and,or, if the merchandise is not returned before expiration of the original term of weeks or months to ownership under the rental purchase agreement, then the total balance of payments necessary to acquire ownership of the merchandise. Generally,If the customer does not return the merchandise or make payment, the remaining book value of the rental merchandise associated with delinquent accounts is generally charged off on or before the ninetieth day following the time the account became past due. Charge offs in our rental stores due to customer stolen merchandise, expressed as a percentage of rental store revenues, were approximately 2.5% in 2005,2008, 2.8% in 2007 and 2.4% in 2004 and 2.3% in 2003.2006.
 In December 2004, we sold to certain qualified buyers our right to collect outstanding amounts due, as well as our interest in the merchandise rented, pursuant to delinquent rental purchase agreements that have been charged off in the ordinary course of business as described above. The accounts ranged from approximately one to five years old. We sold such accounts for approximately $7.9 million, and recorded that amount as other income in our consolidated statement of earnings. In the future, we may again sell charged off accounts. However, there can be no assurance that such sales will occur, or if consummated, will result in material sales proceeds.
Management
 
We organize our network of stores geographically with multiple levels of management. At the individual store level, each store manager is responsible for customer and account relations, delivery and collection of merchandise, inventory management, staffing, training store personnel and certain marketing efforts. ThreeTwo times each week, store management is required to count the store’s inventory on hand and compare the count to theour accounting records, with the marketdistrict manager performing a similar audit at least quarterly. In addition, our individual store managers track their daily store performance for revenue collected as compared to the projected performance of their store. Each store manager reports to a marketdistrict manager within close proximity who typically oversees six to eight stores. Typically, a marketdistrict manager focuses on developing the personnel in his or her marketdistrict and ensuring all stores meet our quality, cleanliness and service standards. In addition, a marketdistrict manager routinely audits numerous areas of the stores’ operations. A significant portion of a marketdistrict manager’s and store manager’s compensation is dependent upon store revenues and profits, which are monitored by our management reporting system and our tight control over inventory afforded by our direct shipment practice.profits.

7


 
At December 31, 2005,2008, we had 390 market483 district managers who, in turn, reported to 6276 regional directors. Regional directors monitor the results of their entire region, with an emphasis on developing and supervising the marketdistrict managers in their region. Similar to the marketdistrict managers, regional directors are responsible for ascertaining whether stores are following the operational guidelines. The regional directors report to nine senior10 division vice presidents


7


located throughout the country. The regional directors and seniordivision vice presidents receive a significant amount of their compensation based on the revenue and profitability of the stores under their management.
 
Our executive management team at the home office oversees field operations, with an overall strategic focus. The executive management team directs and coordinates advertising, purchasing, financial planning and controls, employee training, personnel matters, acquisitions and new store initiatives. The centralization and coordination of such operational matters allows our store managers to focus on individual store performance. A significant amountportion of our executive management compensation is determined in part onby the profits generated by us.
Management Information Systems
 
Through a licensing agreement with High Touch, Inc., we utilize an integrated management information and control system. Each store is equipped with a computer system utilizing point of sale software developed by High Touch. This system tracks individual components of revenue, each item in idle and rented inventory, total items on rent, delinquent accounts, items in service and other account information. We electronically gather each day’s activity report, which provides our executive management with access to all operating and financial information concerning any of our stores, markets or regions and generates management reports on a daily, weekly,month-to-date month-to-date andyear-to-date year-to-date basis for each store and for every rental purchase transaction. The system enables us to track all of our merchandise and rental purchase agreements, which often include more than one unit of merchandise. In addition, our bank reconciliation system performs a daily sweep of available funds from our stores’ depository accounts into our central operating account based on a formula from bank balances that is reconciled back to the balances reported by the stores. Our system also includes extensive management software, report-generating capabilities and a virtual private network. The virtual private network allows us to communicate with the stores more effectively and efficiently. The reports for all stores are reviewed on a daily basis by management and unusual items are typically addressed the following business day. Utilizing the management information system, our executive management, seniordivision vice presidents, regional directors, marketdistrict managers and store managers closely monitor the productivity of stores under their supervision according to our prescribed guidelines.
 
The integration of our management information system, developed by High Touch, with our accounting system, developed by Lawson Software, Inc., facilitates the production of our internal financial statements. These financial statements are distributed monthly to all stores, markets, regions and our executive management team for their review.
Purchasing and Distribution
 
Our executive management determines the general product mix in our stores based on analyses of customer rental patterns and the introduction of new products on a test basis. Individual store managers are responsible for determining the particular product selection for their store from the list of products approved by executive management. Store and marketdistrict managers make specific purchasing decisions for the stores, subject to review by executive management, on our online ordering system. Additionally, we have predetermined levels of inventory allowed in each store which restrict levels of merchandise that may be purchased. All merchandise is shipped by vendors directly to each store, where it is held for rental. We do not utilize any distribution centers. These practices allow us to retain tight control over our inventory and, along with our selection of products for which consistent historical demand has been shown, reduce the number of obsolete items in our stores. The stores also have online access to determine whether other stores in their market may have merchandise available. We are currently investing in new inventory management systems and processes to enhance further our inventory management.

8


 
We purchase the majority of our merchandise from manufacturers, who ship directly to each store. Our largest suppliers include AshleyWhirlpool and Whirlpool,Ashley, who accounted for approximately 16.6%14.8% and 14.9%12.6%, respectively, of merchandise purchased in 2005.2008. No other supplier accounted for more than 10% of merchandise purchased during this period. We do not generally enter into written contracts with our suppliers that obligate us to meet certain minimum purchasing levels. Although we expect to continue relationships with our existing suppliers, we believe that there are numerous sources of products available, and we do not believe that the success of our operations is dependent on any one or more of our present suppliers.


8


Marketing
 
We promote the products and services in our stores through direct mail advertising, radio, television and secondaryradio commercials, print media advertisements.advertisements, direct response and store signage, all of which are designed to increase our name recognition among our customers and potential customers. Our advertisements emphasize such features as product and name-brand selection, prompt delivery, price match, service at no extra cost, lifetime reinstatement and the absence of initial deposits, credit investigations or long-term obligations. In 2005,2007, we also continuedbegan the “RAC Worry-Free Guaranteetm” initiative to pursue strategic alliancesfurther highlight and other sponsorship opportunities, whichpromote these aspects of the rent-to-own transaction. In 2008, we introduced “Credit Free Life,” an integrated campaign utilizing TV, radio, newspaper ande-mail initiatives, as well as an information microsite, to explain how a rent-to-own transaction can help consumers meet their needs without incurring debt. We believe that as theRent-A-Center name gains familiarity and national recognition through our advertising efforts, we will enhancecontinue to educate our name recognition. customers and potential customers about the rent-to-own alternative to merchandise purchases as well as solidify our reputation as a leading provider of high quality branded merchandise and services.
Advertising expense as a percentage of store revenue for the years ended December 31, 2005, 20042008, 2007 and 20032006 was approximately 2.9%, 2.8% and 3.1%2.8%, respectively. As we obtain new stores in our existing market areas, the advertising expenses of each store in the market can generally be reduced by listing all stores in the same market-wide advertisement.
Competition
 
Therent-to-own rent-to-own industry is highly competitive. According to industry sources and our estimates, the threetwo largest industry participants account for approximately 4,7004,800 of the 8,300 rent-to-own8,500 rent-to-own stores in the United States.States and Canada. We are the largest operator in therent-to-own rent-to-own industry with 2,7603,037 stores and 296222 franchised locations as of December 31, 2005.2008. Our stores compete with other national and regionalrent-to-own rent-to-own businesses, as well as with rental stores that do not offer their customers a purchase option. With respect to customers desiring to purchase merchandise for cash or on credit, we also compete with retail stores. Competition is based primarily on store location, product selection and availability, customer service and rental rates and terms.
Seasonality
 
Our revenue mix is moderately seasonal, with the first quarter of each fiscal year generally providing higher merchandise sales than any other quarter during a fiscal year, primarily related to federal income tax refunds. Generally, our customers will more frequently exercise their early purchase option on their existing rental purchase agreements or purchase pre-leased merchandise off the showroom floor during the first quarter of each fiscal year. We expect this trend to continue in future periods. Furthermore, we tend to experience slower growth in the number of rental purchase agreements on rent in the third quarter of each fiscal year when compared to other quarters throughout the year. As a result, we would expect revenues for the third quarter of each fiscal year to remain relatively flat with the prior quarter. We expect this trend to continue in future periods unless we add significantly to our store base during the third quarter of future fiscal years as a result of new store openings or opportunistic acquisitions.
ColorTymeRetail Store Operations
 
As of December 31, 2008, we operated 31 stores utilizing a retail model which generates installment credit sales through a retail sale transaction. Twenty-three of these stores operate under the name “Get It Now” and eight stores under the name “Home Choice.” Our retail stores are located in Illinois, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
ColorTyme Operations
ColorTyme is our nationwide franchisor ofrent-to-own rent-to-own stores. At December 31, 2005,2008, ColorTyme franchised 296 rent-to-own222 stores in 3834 states. Theserent-to-own rent-to-own stores primarily offer high quality durable products such as home electronics, appliances, computers and furniture and accessories. During 2005, 402008, 15 new franchise locations were added, three were closed and 5417 were sold, all of which 16 were sold to anotherRent-A-Center subsidiary.subsidiary, and three stores closed.


9


All but 8 of the ColorTyme franchised stores use ColorTyme’s trade names, service marks, trademarks logos, emblems and indicia of origin. These 8 stores are franchises acquired in the Thorn Americas acquisition in 1998 and continue to use theRent-A-Center name.logos. All stores operate under distinctive operating procedures and standards. ColorTyme’s primary source of revenue is the sale of rental merchandise to its

9


franchisees who, in turn, offer the merchandise to the general public for rent or purchase under arent-to-own rent-to-own program. As franchisor, ColorTyme receives royalties of 2.0% to 5.0% of the franchisees’ monthly gross revenue and, generally, an initial fee of between $7,500up to $20,000 per new location for existing franchisees and up to $35,000$25,000 per location for new franchisees.
 
The ColorTyme franchise agreement generally requires the franchised stores to utilize specific computer hardware and software for the purpose of recording rentals, sales and other record keeping and central functions. ColorTyme retains the right to retrieve data and information from the franchised stores’ computer systems. The franchise agreements also limit the ability of the franchisees to compete with other franchisees.franchisees and provides us a right of first refusal to purchase the franchise location of a ColorTyme franchisee that wishes to exit the business.
 
The franchise agreement also requires the franchised stores to exclusively offer for rent or sale only those brands, types and models of products that ColorTyme has approved. The franchised stores are required to maintain an adequate mix of inventory that consists of approved products for rent as dictated by ColorTyme policy manuals. ColorTyme negotiates purchase arrangements with various suppliers it has approved. ColorTyme’s largest suppliers are Ashley and Whirlpool, which accounted for approximately 19%18.5% and 13%11.0% of merchandise purchased by ColorTyme in 2005,2008, respectively.
 
ColorTyme franchisees may also offer financial services, such as short term secured and unsecured loans, in addition to traditional rent-to-own products. In addition, some of ColorTyme’s franchised stores offer custom rims and tires for sale or rental under the trade names “RimTyme” or “ColorTyme Custom Wheels.” As of December 31, 2008, 42 ColorTyme stores operated by 17 separate franchisees offered financial services. Twelve ColorTyme stores operated by four separate franchisees offered tires and rims exclusively.
ColorTyme is a party to an agreement with Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc. (“Wells Fargo”), who provides $50.0$35.0 million in aggregate financing to qualifying franchisees of ColorTyme generally of up to five times their average monthly revenues. Under the Wells Fargo agreement, upon an event of default by the franchisee under agreements governing this financing and upon the occurrence of certain other events, Wells Fargo can assign the loans and the collateral securing such loans to ColorTyme, with ColorTyme paying the outstanding debt to Wells Fargo and then succeeding to the rights of Wells Fargo under the debt agreements, including the right to foreclose on the collateral. The Wells Fargo agreement expires in October 2006. Although we believe we will be able to renew our existing agreement or find other financing arrangements, we cannot assure you that we will not need to fund the foregoing guarantee upon the expiration of the existing agreement.on September 30, 2010. An additional $20.0 million of financing is provided by Texas Capital Bank, National Association (“Texas Capital Bank”) under an agreement similar to the Wells Fargo financing.Rent-A-Center East, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary ofRent-A-Center, Inc., guarantees the obligations of ColorTyme under each of these agreements, excluding the effects of any amounts that could be recovered under collateralization provisions, up to a maximum amount of $70.0$55.0 million, of which $30.3$24.5 million was outstanding as of December 31, 2005. Mark E. Speese,Rent-A-Center’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, is a passive investor in Texas Capital Bank, owning less than 1% of its outstanding equity.2008.
 
ColorTyme has established a national advertising fund for the franchised stores, whereby ColorTyme has the right to collect up to 3% of the monthly gross revenue from each franchisee as contributions to the fund. Currently, ColorTyme has set the monthly franchisee contribution at $250 per store per month. ColorTyme directs the advertising programs of the fund, generally consisting of advertising in print, television and radio. ColorTyme also has the right to require franchisees to expend 3% of their monthly gross revenue on local advertising.
 
ColorTyme licenses the use of its trademarks and servicemarks to theits franchisees under the franchise agreement. ColorTyme owns the registeredvarious trademarks and servicemarks, including ColorTyme®, ColorTyme-What’s Right for YouRimTyme®, and FlexTymeYour Hometown ColorTyme®, alongthat are used in connection with certain designits operations and service marks.have been registered with the United States Patent and Trademark office. The duration of these marks is unlimited, subject to periodic renewal and continued use.
 
Some of ColorTyme’s franchisees may be in locations where they directly compete with our company-owned stores, which could negatively impact the business, financial condition and operating results of our company-owned stores.
      The ColorTyme franchise agreement provides us a right of first refusal to purchase the franchise location of a ColorTyme franchisee that wishes to exit the business.


10

10


Get It Now Operations
      All of our Wisconsin stores are operated by our subsidiary Get It Now, LLC. Get It Now operates under a retail model which generates installment credit sales through a retail transaction. As of December 31, 2005, we operated 21 company-owned stores within Wisconsin, all of which operate under the name “Get It Now.”
Financial Services Operations
 
We offer financial services products, such as short term secured and unsecured loans, bill paying, debit cards, check cashing, tax preparation and money transfer services under the trade name “The Cash AdvantEdge.”names “RAC Financial Services” and “Cash AdvantEdge” within certain of our existingRent-A-Center store locations. As of December 31, 2005,2008, we offered some or all of these financial services products in 40351Rent-A-Center store locations in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Utah and Washington.18 states. We expectintend to offer suchfocus our resources on improving the operations in these existing financial services products in 140store locations and do not plan to 200add significantly to the number ofRent-A-Center store locations by the end of 2006. offering financial services at this time.
Stores offering financial services products in addition to traditionalrent-to-own rent-to-own products generally require one to two additional employees. TheManagement of our financial services business is managed byintegrated with our executive management team at the home office.rent-to-own operations, with five financial services regional directors and 44 financial services district managers reporting to our division vice presidents.
 
Our financial services business operates in a highly competitive industry. Similar financial services products are offered by large regional or national entities, smaller independent outlets and pawnshops. Competitive factors include location, service, maximum loan amount, repayment options and fees.
Trademarks
 
We own various registered trademarks and servicemarks, includingRent-A-Center®, Renters Choice®, and Get It Now®. We have submitted a trademark application for “The Cash AdvantEdge”that are used in connection with our financial servicesoperations and have been registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The duration of our trademarks is unlimited, subject to periodic renewal and continued use. In addition, we have obtained trademark registrations in Canada. We believe we hold the necessary rights for protection of the trademarks and servicemarks essential to our business. The products held for rent in our stores also bear trademarks and service marksservicemarks held by their respective manufacturers.
Employees
 
As of March 3, 2006,February 18, 2009, we had approximately 15,48017,900 employees, of whom 404575 are assigned to our headquarters and the remainder of whom are directly involved in the management and operation of our stores and service centers. The employees of the ColorTyme franchisees are not employed by us. While we have experienced limited union activity in the past, none of our employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement.
We believe relationships with our employees are generally good. In connection with the settlement in December 2002 of a class action matter alleging discriminatory, gender-based employment practices, we entered into a four-year consent decree, which can be extended by the court for an additional one year upon a showing of good cause. Under the terms of the consent decree, we augmented our human resources department and our internal employee complaint procedures, enhanced our gender anti-discrimination training for all employees, and hired a consultant mutually acceptable to the parties to advise us on employment matters. We provide certain reports to the EEOC regarding our compliance with the consent decree, as well as our efforts to recruit, hire and promote qualified women. We continue to take steps to improve opportunities for women. We believe that we are in compliance in all material respects with our obligations under the consent decree.
Government Regulation
Rental Purchase Transactions
Rental Purchase Transactions
State Regulation
 
State Regulation
Currently, 47 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico have legislation regulating rental purchase transactions. We believe this existing legislation is generally favorable to us, as it defines and clarifies the various disclosures, procedures and transaction structures related to therent-to-own rent-to-own business with which we must comply. With some variations in individual states, most related state legislation requires the lessor to make prescribed disclosures to customers about the rental purchase agreement and transaction, and provides

11


time periods during which customers may reinstate agreements despite having failed to make a timely payment. Some state rental purchase laws prescribe grace periods for non-payment, prohibit or limit certain types of collection or other practices, and limit certain fees that may be charged. Nine states limit the total rental payments that can be charged. These limitations, however, generally do not become applicable unless the total rental payments required under an agreement exceed 2.0 times to 2.4 times of the disclosed cash price or the retail value of the rental product.
 
Courts in each of Minnesota, which has a rental purchase statute, and Wisconsin and New Jersey, and Wisconsin, which do not have rental purchase statutes, have had courtrendered decisions which treatclassify rental purchase transactions as credit sales subject to consumer lending restrictions. In response, we have developed and utilized a separate rental agreementAccordingly, in Minnesota which does not provideand Wisconsin, we offer our customers with an option to purchase rented merchandise. In New Jersey, we have provided increased disclosures and longer grace periods in our rental purchase agreements. In Wisconsin, our Get It Now customers are provided an opportunity to purchase our merchandise through an installment sale transaction.transaction in our Get It Now and Home Choice stores. In New Jersey, we have modified our typical rental purchase agreements to provide disclosures, grace


11


periods, and pricing that we believe conform with the retail installment sales act. We operate four25 Get It Now and Home Choice stores in Minnesota and 43Wisconsin, and 44Rent-A-Center stores in New Jersey. Get It Now, our subsidiary, operates 21 stores in Wisconsin.
 
North Carolina has no rental purchase legislation. However, the retail installment sales statute in North Carolina recognizesexpressly provides that rental purchaselease transactions which provide for more than a nominal purchase price at the end of the agreed rental period are not credit sales under suchthe statute. We operate 111133 stores in North Carolina.
Federal Legislation
Legislation has been introduced in New York from time to time that would significantly amend that state’s existing rental purchase statute. Recently introduced bills would impose significant pricing restrictions in New York and, if enacted as proposed, would have a material and adverse impact on our operations in New York. While predecessors of these bills have not received widespread support from members of either body of New York’s legislature, we are unable to assure you that such adverse legislation will not be enacted in the future. We operate 178 stores in New York.
 
Federal Legislation
To date, no comprehensive federal legislation has been enacted regulating or otherwise impacting the rental purchase transaction. We do, however, comply with the Federal Trade Commission recommendations for disclosure in rental purchase transactions.
 
From time to time, we have supported legislation introduced in Congress that would regulate the rental purchase transaction. Currently, there are two bills pending in Congress that would regulate the rental purchase transaction, both of which are similar in substance to the generally favorable state laws in effect. While both beneficial and adverse legislation may be introduced in Congress in the future, any adverse federal legislation, if enacted, could have a material and adverse effect on us.
 
There can be no assurance thatas to whether new or revised rental purchase laws will not be enacted or whether, if enacted, that the laws would not have a material and adverse effect on us.
Financial Services
Financial Services
 Thirty-four
Our financial services business is subject to regulation and supervision primarily at the state and federal levels. We intend to offer our financial services products only in those jurisdictions with favorable regulatory environments.
In those jurisdictions where we make consumer loans directly to consumers (currently all states in which we offer financial services other than Texas), we are a licensed lender where required and are subject to various state regulations regarding the Districtterms of Columbia provide safe harbor regulations forour short term consumer lending,loans and two additional states, Wisconsinour policies, procedures and New Mexico, permit short termoperations relating to those loans. Typically, state regulations limit the amount that we may lend to any consumer lendingand, in some cases, the number of loans or transactions that we may make to any consumer at one time or in the course of a year. These state regulations also typically restrict the amount of finance or service charges or fees that we may assess in connection with any loan or transaction and may limit a customer’s ability to renew or “rollover” a loan.
We operate our financial services business in Texas under the Texas Credit Services Organization law which requires that we register as a Credit Services Organization (“CSO”) with the Texas Secretary of State, pay a registration fee and post surety bonds for each location. The CSO may, for a fee, help a consumer obtain an extension of credit from an independent third-party lender. We must also comply with various disclosure requirements, which include providing the consumer with a disclosure statement and contract that detail the services to be performed by the CSO and the total cost of those services along with various other items. Additionally, the CSO must give a consumer the right to cancel the credit services agreement without penalty within 3 days after the agreement is signed.
We are subject to regulation in several jurisdictions in which we operate that require the registration or licensing of check cashing companies or regulate the fees that check cashing companies may impose. In some of these jurisdictions, we may be required to file fee schedules with the state or conspicuously post the fees charged for cashing checks by each branch. In some cases, we are required to meet minimum bonding or capital requirements and are subject to record-keeping requirements. We are licensed lenders. Safe harbor regulations typically set maximum fees, size and lengthin each of the loans. Fourteen states prohibit or limit short term consumer lending through small loan rate capsjurisdictions in which a license is currently required for us to operate as a check cashing company and have filed our schedule of fees with


12


each of the states or state usuryother jurisdictions in which such a filing is required. To the extent those states have adopted ceilings including New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Texas. on check cashing fees, the fees we currently charge are at or below the maximum ceiling.
In addition, our financial services business is subject to federal statutes and regulations such as the USA Patriot Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Truth in Lending Act, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Anti-Money Laundering Act, and similar state laws.
 
In October 2006, U.S. federal legislation was enacted which limited our ability to offer financial services to active duty military personnel beginning in October 2007. There was no significant effect on our operations due to the restriction on lending to military personnel.
In 2008, legislation was enacted in Ohio which revised the statutes governing the short term consumer loan product we offered there at that time. The rate caps under the revised statute made it economically unfeasible to continue offering our loan products pursuant to that statute. As a result of this adverse legislation, we began offering alternative loan products and services in Ohio under other applicable provisions of Ohio law. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in offering these alternative products and services to consumers in Ohio, or whether such alternative products and services will prove to be economically feasible. We operate 51 stores in Ohio.
Legislative activity with respect to the financial services industry at the state and federal level continues to be significant. Both favorable and adverse legislation has been introduced in a number of states as well as in Congress. There can be no assurance thatas to whether new or revised financial services laws will not be enacted or whether, if enacted, that the laws would not have a material and adverse effect on us.

12


Item 1A.Risk Factors.
Item 1A.     Risk Factors.
You should carefully consider the risks described below before making an investment decision. We believe these are all the material risks currently facing our business. Our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected by these risks. The trading price of our common stock could decline due to any of these risks, and you may lose all or part of your investment. You should also refer to the other information included or incorporated by reference in this report, including our financial statements and related notes.
We may not be able to successfully implementincrease revenue in our growth strategy,rent-to-own stores, which could cause our future earnings to grow more slowly or even decrease.
 As part of our growth strategy, we intend to increase our total number ofrent-to-own stores in both existing markets and new markets through a combination of new store openings and store acquisitions. We increased our store base by 241 stores in 2003, and 227 stores in 2004. In 2005, however, we decreased our store base by 115 stores, as part of our critical evaluation of all stores and in anticipation of continued store growth. This growth strategy is subject to various risks, including uncertainties regarding our ability to open newrent-to-own stores and our ability to acquire additionalrent-to-own stores on favorable terms. We may not be able to continue to identify profitable new store locations or underperforming competitors as we currently anticipate.
Our continued growth also depends on our ability to increase sales in our existingrent-to-own rent-to-own stores. Our same store sales increased by 3.0% for 20032.3%, 2.1% and decreased by 3.6%1.9% in 2008, 2007 and 2.3% in 2004 and 2005,2006, respectively. As a result of new store openings in existing markets and because mature stores will represent an increasing proportion of our store base over time, our same store revenues in future periods may be lower than historical levels. If we are unable to increase revenue in our rent-to-own stores, our earnings may grow more slowly or even decrease.
 We also plan
If we fail to grow through expansion intoeffectively manage the growth, integration and profitability of our financial services business. business, we may not realize the economic benefit of our financial investment in such operations.
We face risks associated with integrating this newour financial services business into our existing operations.operations, including further development of information technology and financial reporting systems. In addition, a newly opened financial services location generally does not attain positive cash flow during its first year of operations. Also, the financial services industry is highly competitive and regulated by federal, state and local laws.
 
Our growth strategyexpansion into the financial services business could place a significant demand on our management and our financial and operational resources. If we are unable to effectively implement our growth strategy, our earningsfinancial services business, we may grow more slowly or even decrease.
If we fail to effectively managenot realize the growth and integrationoperational benefits of our investment in the financial services business that we currently expect.


13


Rent-to-own transactions are regulated by law in most states. Any adverse change in these laws or the passage of adverse newrent-to-own stores, laws could expose us to litigation or require us to alter our financial results may be adversely affected.business practices.
 The addition of newrent-to-own stores, both through store openings and through acquisitions, requires
As is the integration of our management philosophies and personnel, standardization of training programs, realization of operating efficiencies and effective coordination of sales and marketing and financial reporting efforts. In addition, acquisitions in generalcase with most businesses, we are subject to various governmental regulations, including specifically in our case, regulations regarding rent-to-own transactions. Currently, 47 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico have passed laws regulating rental purchase transactions and one additional state has a numberretail installment sales statute that excludes rent-to-own transactions from its coverage if certain criteria are met. These laws generally require certain contractual and advertising disclosures. They also provide varying levels of special risks, includingsubstantive consumer protection, such as requiring a grace period for late fees and contract reinstatement rights in the event the rental purchase agreement is terminated. The rental purchase laws of nine states limit the total amount of rentals that may be charged over the life of a rental purchase agreement. Several states also effectively regulate rental purchase transactions under other consumer protection statutes. We are currently subject to litigation alleging that we have violated some of these statutory provisions.
Although there is currently no comprehensive federal legislation regulating rental purchase transactions, adverse short-term effects onfederal legislation may be enacted in the future. From time to time, legislation has been introduced in Congress seeking to regulate our reported operating results, diversion of management’s attention and unanticipated problemsbusiness. In addition, various legislatures in the states where we currently do business may adopt new legislation or legal liabilities. Further, a newly openedrent-to-own store generally does not attain positive cash flow during its first year of operations.amend existing legislation that could require us to alter our business practices.
ThereFinancial services transactions are regulated by federal law as well as the laws of certain states. Any adverse changes in these laws or the passage of adverse new laws with respect to the financial services business could slow our growth opportunities, expose us to litigation or alter our business practices in a manner that we may deem to be unacceptable.
Our financial services business is subject to federal statutes and regulations such as the USA Patriot Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Truth in Lending Act, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Anti-Money Laundering Act, and similar state laws. In addition, we are subject to various state regulations regarding the terms of our short term consumer loans and our policies, procedures and operations relating to those loans, including the fees we may charge, as well as fees we may charge in connection with our other financial services products. The failure to comply with such regulations may result in the imposition of material fines, penalties, or injunctions. Congressand/or the various legislatures in the states where we currently operate or intend to offer financial services products may adopt new legislation or amend existing legislation with respect to our financial services business that could require us to alter our business practices in a manner that we may deem to be unacceptable, which could slow our growth opportunities.
We may be subject to legal proceedings pending against us seekingfrom time to time which seek material damages. The costs we incur in defending ourselves or associated with settling any of these proceedings, as well as a material final judgment or decree against us, could materially adversely affect our financial condition by requiring the payment of the settlement amount, a judgment or the posting of a bond.
 Some lawsuits against us involve claims that
In our rental agreements constitute installment sales contracts, violate state usury laws or violate other state laws enacted to protect consumers. We are also defending ahistory, we have defended class action lawsuit alleging we violated the securities laws and lawsuits alleging various regulatory violations and have paid material amounts to settle such claims. We cannot assure you that we violated state wage and hour laws. Becausewill not be the subject of similar lawsuits in the uncertainties associated with litigation, we cannot estimate for you our ultimate liability for these matters, if any.future. Significant settlement amounts or final judgments could materially and adversely

13


affect our liquidity. The failure to pay any material judgment would be a default under our senior credit facilities and the indenture governing our outstanding subordinated notes.
Our debt agreements impose restrictions on us which may limit or prohibit us from engaging in certain transactions. If a default were to occur, our lenders could accelerate the amounts of debt outstanding, and holders of our secured indebtedness could force us to sell our assets to satisfy all or a part of what is owed.
 
Covenants under our senior credit facilities and the indenture governing our outstanding subordinated notes restrict our ability to pay dividends, engage in various operational matters, as well as require us to maintain specified financial ratios and satisfy specified financial tests.ratios. Our ability to meet these financial ratios and tests may be affected by events beyond our control. These


14


restrictions could limit our ability to obtain future financing, make needed capital expenditures or other investments, repurchase our outstanding debt or equity, withstand a future downturn in our business or in the economy, dispose of operations, engage in mergers, acquire additional stores or otherwise conduct necessary corporate activities. Various transactions that we may view as important opportunities, such as specified acquisitions, are also subject to the consent of lenders under the senior credit facilities, which may be withheld or granted subject to conditions specified at the time that may affect the attractiveness or viability of the transaction.
 
If a default were to occur, the lenders under our senior credit facilities could accelerate the amounts outstanding under the credit facilities, and our other lenders could declare immediately due and payable all amounts borrowed under other instruments that contain certain provisions for cross-acceleration or cross-default. In addition, the lenders under these agreements could terminate their commitments to lend to us. If the lenders under these agreements accelerate the repayment of borrowings, we may not have sufficient liquid assets at that time to repay the amounts then outstanding under our indebtedness or be able to find additional alternative financing. Even if we could obtain additional alternative financing, the terms of the financing may not be favorable or acceptable to us.
 
The existing indebtedness under our senior credit facilities is secured by substantially all of our assets. Should a default or acceleration of this indebtedness occur, the holders of this indebtedness could sell the assets to satisfy all or a part of what is owed. Our senior credit facilities also contain certain provisions prohibiting the modification oflimiting our ability to modify or refinance our outstanding subordinated notes, as well as limiting the ability to refinance such notes.
A change of control could accelerate our obligation to pay our outstanding indebtedness, and we may not have sufficient liquid assets at that time to repay these amounts.
 
Under our senior credit facilities, an event of default would result if a third party became the beneficial owner of 35.0% or more of our voting stock or upon certain changes in the constitution of ourRent-A-Center’s Board of Directors. As of December 31, 2005, we were required to make principal payments2008, $721.7 million was outstanding under our senior credit facilities of $3.5 million in 2006, $3.5 million in 2007, $3.5 million in 2008, $168.0 million in 2009 and $166.3 million after 2009. These payments reduce our cash flow.debt.
 
Under the indenture governing our outstanding subordinated notes, in the event that a change in control occurs, we may be required to offer to purchase all of our outstanding subordinated notes at 101% of their original aggregate principal amount, plus accrued interest to the date of repurchase. A change in control also would result in an event of default under our senior credit facilities, which would allow our lenders to accelerate indebtedness owed to them.
 
If the lenders under our debt instruments accelerate these obligations, we may not have sufficient liquid assets to repay amounts outstanding under these agreements.
Rent-to-own transactions are regulated by law in most states. Any adverse change in these laws or the passage of adverse new laws could expose us to litigation or require us to alter our business practices.
      As is the case with most businesses, we are subject to various governmental regulations, including specifically in our case regulations regardingrent-to-own transactions. There are currently 47 states that have

14


passed laws regulating rental purchase transactions and another state that has a retail installment sales statute that excludesrent-to-own transactions from its coverage if certain criteria are met. These laws generally require certain contractual and advertising disclosures. They also provide varying levels of substantive consumer protection, such as requiring a grace period for late fees and contract reinstatement rights in the event the rental purchase agreement is terminated. The rental purchase laws of nine states limit the total amount of rentals that may be charged over the life of a rental purchase agreement. Several states also effectively regulate rental purchase transactions under other consumer protection statutes. We are currently subject to litigation alleging that we have violated some of these statutory provisions.
      Although there is currently no comprehensive federal legislation regulating rental-purchase transactions, adverse federal legislation may be enacted in the future. From time to time, legislation has been introduced in Congress seeking to regulate our business. In addition, various legislatures in the states where we currently do business may adopt new legislation or amend existing legislation that could require us to alter our business practices.
Financial services transactions are regulated by federal law as well as the laws of certain states. Any adverse changes in these laws or the passage of adverse new laws with respect to the financial services business could slow our growth opportunities, expose us to litigation or alter our business practices in a manner that we may deem to be unacceptable.
      Our financial services business is subject to federal statutes and regulations such as the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Truth in Lending Act, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and similar state laws. In addition, thirty-four states and the District of Columbia provide safe harbor regulations for short term consumer lending, and two additional states permit short term consumer lending by licensed dealers. Safe harbor regulations typically set maximum fees, size and length of the loans. Congress and/or the various legislatures in the states where we currently intend to offer financial services products may adopt new legislation or amend existing legislation with respect to our financial services business that could require us to alter our business practices in a manner that we may deem to be unacceptable, which could slow our growth opportunities.
Our business depends on a limited number of key personnel, with whom we do not have employment agreements. The loss of any one of these individuals could disrupt our business.
      Our continued success is highly dependent upon the personal efforts and abilities of our senior management, including Mark E. Speese, our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and Mitchell E. Fadel, our President and Chief Operating Officer. We do not have employment contracts with or maintain key-person insurance on the lives of any of these officers and the loss of any one of them could disrupt our business.
OurRent-A-Center’s organizational documents and our debt instruments contain provisions that may prevent or deter another group from paying a premium over the market price to ourRent-A-Center’s stockholders to acquire ourits stock.
 Our
Rent-A-Center’s organizational documents contain provisions that classify our boardits Board of directors,Directors, authorize our boardits Board of directorsDirectors to issue blank check preferred stock and establish advance notice requirements on ourits stockholders for director nominations and actions to be taken at annual meetings of the stockholders. In addition, as a Delaware corporation, we areRent-A-Center is subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law relating to business combinations. Our senior credit facilities and the indenture governing our subordinated notes each contain various change of control provisions which, in the event of a change of control, would cause a default under those provisions. These provisions and arrangements could delay, deter or prevent a merger, consolidation, tender offer or other business combination or change of control involving us that could include a premium over the market price of ourRent-A-Center’s common stock that some or a majority of ourRent-A-Center’s stockholders might consider to be in their best interests.

15


We areRent-A-Center is a holding company and areis dependent on the operations and funds of ourits subsidiaries.
 We are
Rent-A-Center is a holding company, with no revenue generating operations and no assets other than ourits ownership interests in ourits direct and indirect subsidiaries. Accordingly, we areRent-A-Center is dependent on the cash flow generated by ourits direct and indirect operating subsidiaries and must rely on dividends or other intercompany


15


transfers from ourits operating subsidiaries to generate the funds necessary to meet ourits obligations, including the obligations under ourthe senior credit facilities and ourthe outstanding subordinated notes. The ability of ourRent-A-Center’s subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other payments to usit is subject to applicable state laws. Should one or more of ourRent-A-Center’s subsidiaries be unable to pay dividends or make distributions, ourits ability to meet ourits ongoing obligations could be materially and adversely impacted.
Our stock price is volatile, and you may not be able to recover your investment if our stock price declines.
 
The price of our common stock has been volatile and can be expected to be significantly affected by factors such as:
 • quarterly variations in our results of operations, which may be impacted by, among other things, changes in same store sales, when and how manyrent-to-own rent-to-own stores we acquire or open, and the rate at which we add financial services to our existingrent-to-own rent-to-own stores;
 
 • quarterly variations in our competitors’ results of operations;
 
 • changes in earnings estimates or buy/sell recommendations by financial analysts; and
 
 • the stock price performance of comparable companies; and
• general market conditions or market conditions specific to particular industries.companies.
In addition, the stock market as a whole has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market price of many specialty retailers in ways that may have been unrelated to these companies’ operating performance.
Failure to achieve and maintain effective internal controls could have a material adverse effect on our business and stock price.
 
Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports, our brand and operating results could be harmed. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
 
While we continue to evaluate and improve our internal controls, we cannot be certain that these measures will ensure that we implement and maintain adequate controls over our financial processes and reporting in the future. Any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation, could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations.
 We have completed documenting and testing our internal control procedures in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and a report by our independent registered public accounting firm addressing these assessments. For the year ended December 31, 2005, our management has determined that our internal control over financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Please refer to management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting, and the report by Grant Thornton LLP, which appear later in this report.
If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, as such standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, we may not be able to ensure that we can conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Failure to achieve and maintain an effective internal control environment could cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a material adverse effect on our stock price.

16


Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments.
 
None.
Item 2.Properties.
 
We lease space for substantially all of our stores and service center locations, as well as our corporate and regional offices, under operating leases expiring at various times through 2013.2016. Most of our store leases are five year leases and contain renewal options for additional periods ranging from three to five years at rental rates adjusted according toagreed-upon formulas. Store sizes range from approximately 1,900 to 18,50024,000 square feet, and average approximately 4,6004,700 square feet. Approximately 75% of each store’s space is generally used for showroom space and 25% for offices and storage space. Our headquarters, including Get It Now


16


We own the land and ColorTyme, are each locatedbuilding at 5700 Tennyson Parkway,5501 Headquarters Drive, Plano, Texas, and consists of approximately 115,307 square feet.
      In December 2005, we acquired approximately 15 acres of land located in Plano, Texas, on which we intend to build a newour corporate headquarters facility.are located. The purchase price for the land was approximately $4.2 million. Building costsand improvements are expected to be in the range of $20.0-$25.0 million, with construction beginning in January 2006. Building costs will be paid on a percentage of completion basis throughout the construction period, and the building is expected to be completed by the end of 2006. We intend to finance this project from cash flow generated from operations. Our remaining lease obligation onpledged as collateral under our existing location is approximately $6.2 million. We anticipate subleasing some or all of the space at our current location to offset the remaining lease obligation. Additionally, we have adjusted the remaining life on the assets which will be abandoned upon our move to the new facility.senior credit facilities.
 
We believe that suitable store space generally is available for lease and we would be able to relocate any of our stores without significant difficulty should we be unable to renew a particular lease. We also expect additional space is readily available at competitive rates to open new stores. Under various federal and state laws, lessees may be liable for environmental problems at leased sites even if they did not create, contribute to, or know of the problem. We are not aware of and have not been notified of any material violations of federal, state or local environmental protection or health and safety laws, but cannot guarantee that we will not incur material costs or liabilities under these laws in the future.
Item 3.Legal Proceedings.
 
Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we, along with our subsidiaries, are party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. We account for our litigation contingencies pursuant to the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5,Accounting for Contingencies(“SFAS No. 5”) and FASB Interpretation No. 14,Reasonable Estimation of the Amount of a Loss — An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 5(“FIN 14”), which require that we accrue for losses that are both probable and reasonably estimable. We expense legal fees and expenses incurred in connection with the defense of all of our litigation at the time such amounts are invoiced or otherwise made known to us.
As of December 31, 2008, we had accrued $11.3 million relating to probable losses for our outstanding litigation as follows (in millions):
     
Shafer/Johnson Matter
 $1.8 
California Attorney General Settlement
  9.4 
Other Litigation
  0.1 
     
Total Accrual $11.3 
     
We continue to monitor our litigation exposure, and will review the adequacy of our legal reserves on a quarterly basis in accordance with applicable accounting rules. Please refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies Involving Critical Estimates, Uncertainties or Assessments in Our Financial Statements” regarding our process for evaluating our litigation reserves. Except as described below, we are not currently a party to any material litigation. The ultimate outcome of our litigation is uncertain and, the amount of any loss we may incur, if any, cannot in our judgment be reasonably estimated. Accordingly, other than as set forth above, we have not established any other reserves for our outstanding litigation.
California Attorney General Inquiry.  In January 2009, we paid $9.4 million in accordance with respectthe settlement with the California Attorney General.
Eric Shafer, et al. v.Rent-A-Center, Inc.  We recorded a pre-tax expense of $11.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2007 related to the settlement of thePucci/ChessEric Shafer et al. v.Rent-A-Center, Inc. matter (which was fundedandVictor E. Johnson et al. v.Rent-A-Center, Inc., coordinated matters pending in February 2006),state court in Los Angeles, California. Due to fewer class members eligible to participate in the prospective settlement of theRose/ Madrigalmatter discussed belowthan originally estimated, as well as anticipated legalnegotiated reductions in settlement payments to certain plaintiffs, the maximum claim amount remaining to be paid was reduced by approximately $2.4 million during the fourth quarter of 2008. We also paid settlement costs and plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees in the amount of approximately $4.4 million, and expenses for our other litigation matters, no provision has been madesettlement payments in our consolidated financial statements for any such loss.the aggregate amount of approximately $2.4 million during the fourth quarter of 2008. We expect to fund the maximum remaining settlement payments of approximately $1.8 million during 2009.
 Colon v. Thorn Americas, Inc. The plaintiff filed this
In our history, we have defended class action in November 1997 in New York state court. This matter was assumed by us in connection with the Thorn Americas acquisition. The plaintiff acknowledges thatrent-to-own transactions in New York are subjectlawsuits alleging various regulatory violations and have paid material amounts to the provisions of New York’s Rental Purchase Statute but contends the Rental Purchase Statute does not provide us immunity from suit for other statutory violations. The plaintiff alleges we have a duty to disclose effective interest under New York consumer protection laws, and seeks damages and injunctive relief for failure to do so. This suit also alleges violations relating to excessive and unconscionable pricing, late fees, harassment, undisclosed charges, and the ease of use and accuracy of payment records. In the prayer for relief, the plaintiff requests class certification, injunctive relief requiring us to cease certain marketing practices and price our rental purchase contracts in

17


certain ways, unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, rescission of the class members contracts, an order placing in trust all moneys received by us in connection with the rental of merchandise during the class period, treble damages, attorney’s fees, filing fees and costs of suit, pre- and post-judgment interest, and any further relief granted by the court. The plaintiff has not alleged a specific monetary amount with respect to the request for damages.
      The proposed class includes all New York residents who were party to ourrent-to-own contracts from November 26, 1994. In November 2000, following interlocutory appeal by both parties from the denial of cross-motions for summary judgment, we obtained a favorable ruling from the Appellate Division of the State of New York, dismissing the plaintiff’s claims based on the alleged failure to disclose an effective interest rate. The plaintiff’s other claims were not dismissed. The plaintiff moved to certify a state-wide class in December 2000. The plaintiff’s class certification motion was heard by the court on November 7, 2001 and, on September 12, 2002, the court issued an opinion denying in part and granting in part the plaintiff’s requested certification. The opinion grants certification as to all of the plaintiff’s claims except the plaintiff’s pricing claims pursuant to the Rental Purchase Statute, as to which certification was denied. The parties have differing views as to the effect of the court’s opinion, and accordingly, the court granted the parties permission to submit competing orders as to the effect of the opinion on the plaintiff’s specificsettle such claims. Both proposed orders were submitted to the court on March 27, 2003, and on May 30, 2003, the court held a hearing regarding such orders. No clarifying order has yet been entered by the court.
      From June 2003 until May 2005, there was no activity in this case. On May  18, 2005, we filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s claim and to decertify the class, based upon the plaintiff’s failure to schedule her claim in this matter in her earlier voluntary bankruptcy proceeding. The plaintiff opposed our motion and asked the court to grant it an opportunity to find a substitute class representative in the event the court determined Ms. Colon was no longer adequate. On January 17, 2006, the court issued an order denying our motion, but noted that no motion to intervene to add additional class representatives had been filed. A conference with the court has been scheduled for March 14, 2006. If the court ultimately enters a final certification order, we intend to pursue an interlocutory appeal of such certification order.
We believe these claims are without merit and will continue to vigorously defend ourselves in this case. However, we cannot assure you that we will not be found to have no liability in this matter.
Terry Walker, et. al. v.Rent-A-Center, Inc., et. al. On January 4, 2002, a putative class action was filed against us and certainthe subject of our current and former officers and directors by Terry Walker in federal court in Texarkana, Texas. The complaint alleged that the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and/or Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by issuing false and misleading statements and omitting material facts regarding our financial performance and prospects for the third and fourth quarters of 2001. The complaint purported to be brought on behalf of all purchasers of our common stock from April 25, 2001 through October 8, 2001 and sought damages in unspecified amounts. Similar complaints were consolidated by the court with theWalkermatter in October 2002.
      On November 25, 2002, the lead plaintiffs in theWalkermatter filed an amended consolidated complaint which added certain of our outside directors as defendants to the Exchange Act claims. The amended complaint also added additional claims that we, and certain of our current and former officers and directors, violated various provisions of the Securities Act as a result of alleged misrepresentations and omissions in connection with an offering in May 2001 and also added the managing underwriters in that offering as defendants.
      On February 7, 2003, we, along with certain officer and director defendants, filed a motion to dismiss the matter as well as a motion to transfer venue. In addition, our outside directors namedsimilar lawsuits in the matter separately filed a motion to dismiss the Securities Act claims on statute of limitations grounds. On February 19, 2003, the underwriter defendants also filed a motion to dismiss the matter. The plaintiffs filed response briefs to these motions, to which we replied on May 21, 2003. A hearing was held by the court on June 26, 2003 to hear each of these motions.

18


      On September 30, 2003, the court granted our motion to dismiss without prejudice, dismissed without prejudice the outside directors’ and underwriters’ separate motions to dismiss and denied our motion to transfer venue. In its order on the motions to dismiss, the court granted the lead plaintiffs leave to replead the case within certain parameters.future.
 On July 7, 2004, the plaintiffs again repled their claims by filing a third amended consolidated complaint, raising allegations of similar violations against the same parties generally based upon alleged facts not previously asserted. We, along with certain officer and director defendants and the underwriter defendants, filed motions to dismiss the third amended consolidated complaint on August 23, 2004. A hearing on the motions was held on April 14, 2005. On July 25, 2005, the court ruled on these motions, dismissing with prejudice the claims against our outside directors as well as the underwriter defendants, but denying our motion to dismiss. In evaluating this motion to dismiss, the court was required to view the pleadings in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs and to take the plaintiffs’ allegations as true. On August 18, 2005, we filed a motion to certify the dismissal order for an interlocutory appeal, which was denied on November 14, 2005. Discovery in this matter has now commenced. A hearing on class certification is scheduled for June 22, 2006.
      We continue to believe the plaintiffs’ claims in this matter are without merit and intend to vigorously defend ourselves as this matter progresses. However, we cannot assure you that we will be found to have no liability in this matter.
California Attorney General Inquiry. During the second quarter of 2004, we received an inquiry from the California Attorney General regarding our business practices in California with respect to our cash prices and our membership program. We met with representatives of the Attorney General’s office during the first quarter and fourth quarter of 2005, and provided additional information with respect to our membership program as requested. We are continuing to discuss these issues with the Attorney General’s office.
State Wage and Hour Class Actions
      We recently settled a material action pending against us in Oregon, and are currently subject to various material actions pending against us in the states of California and Washington, all of which allege we violated the wage and hour laws of such states.
Rob Pucci, et. al v.Rent-A-Center, Inc; Jeremy Chess et. al. v.Rent-A-Center, Inc. et. al.; Clemmons et. al. v.Rent-A-Center, Inc., et. al. On August 20, 2001, the putative class action entitledRob Pucci, et. al. v.Rent-A-Center, Inc. was filed in state court in Multnomah County, Oregon alleging we violated various provisions of Oregon state law regarding overtime, lunch and work breaks, that we failed to pay all wages due to our Oregon employees, and various contract claims that we promised but failed to pay overtime.Puccisought to represent a class of all present and former executive assistants, inside/outside managers and account managers employed by us within the six year period prior to the filing of the complaint as to the contract claims, and three years as to the statutory claims, and sought class certification, payments for all unpaid wages under Oregon law, statutory and civil penalties, costs and disbursements, pre-and post-judgment interest in the amount of 9% per annum and attorneys fees.
      On July 25, 2002, the plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification and on July 31, 2002, we filed our motion for summary judgment. On January 15, 2003, the court orally granted our motion for summary judgment in part, ruling that the plaintiffs were prevented from recovering overtime payments at the rate of “time and a half,” but stated that the plaintiffs may recover “straight-time” to the extent plaintiffs could prove purported class members worked in excess of forty hours in a work week but were not paid for such time worked. The court denied our motion for summary judgment on the remaining claims.
      On October 10, 2003, the court issued an opinion letter stating that it would certify a class and not permit an interlocutory appeal, and issued its written order to that effect on December 9, 2003.
      On March 17, 2005,Pucciclass members Jeremy Chess and Chad Clemmons filed an amended class action complaint entitledJeremy Chess et al. v.Rent-A-Center, Inc. et al, alleging similar claims as the plaintiffs inPucciand seeking unspecified statutory and contractual damages and penalties, as well as injunctive relief. TheChessplaintiffs sought to represent a class of all present and former executive assistants,

19


inside/outside managers and account managers employed by us within the six year period prior to the filing of the complaint as to the contract claims, and three years as to the statutory claims. On April 15, 2005, we filed pleadings removing the case to the federal court for the District of Oregon under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005. TheChessplaintiffs were represented by the same attorneys as thePucci plaintiffs.
      On June 23, 2005, we reached an agreement in principle to settle the claims inPucciandChess. Under the settlement, we agreed to pay $1.75 million to settle all class claims, including payments to the class and its representatives, the plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees and administrative costs, subject to adjustment based upon the size of the class. The final class included approximately 777 current and former account managers, inside/outside managers, and executive assistant managers that were employed by us in Oregon. In connection therewith, the plaintiffs’ counsel in thePucciandChessmatters filed a new class action complaint in Federal court entitledClemmons et al v.Rent-A-Center Inc., et al, alleging substantially similar claims and seeking similar damages as inPucciandChessthrough the date of filing. The parties used theClemmonscase to consolidate thePucciandChessclaims, and facilitate final approval, administration and distribution of the settlement. Notice of the settlement was mailed to class members on or about November 15, 2005 and no class member objected to the settlement or sought exclusion from the class. Accordingly, at December 31, 2005, $1.9 million was reserved with respect to this matter covering the anticipated settlement and our attorneys’ fees. On January 20, 2006, thePucciandClemmonscourts approved the final settlement, entered a final judgment and dismissed the respective cases. We funded the settlement in February 2006.
Jeremy Burdusis, et al. v.Rent-A-Center, Inc., et al./ Israel French, et al. v.Rent-A-Center, Inc. These matters pending in Los Angeles, California were filed on October 23, 2001, and October 30, 2001, respectively, and allege similar violations of the wage and hour laws of California as those inPucci. The same law firm inPucciis seeking to represent the purported class inBurdusis. TheBurdusisandFrenchproceedings are pending before the same judge in California. On March 24, 2003, theBurdusiscourt denied the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification in that case, which we view as a favorable development in that proceeding. On April 25, 2003, the plaintiffs inBurdusisfiled a notice of appeal of that ruling, and on May 8, 2003, theBurdusiscourt, at our request, stayed further proceedings inBurdusisandFrenchpending the resolution on appeal of the court’s denial of class certification inBurdusis. In June 2004, theBurdusisplaintiffs filed their appellate brief. Our response brief was filed in September 2004, and theBurdusisplaintiffs filed their reply in October 2004. On February 9, 2005, the California Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the trial court’s denial of class certification inBurdusisand directed the trial court to reconsider its ruling in light of two other recent appellate court decisions, including the opinions of the California Supreme Court inSav-On Drugs Stores, Inc. v. Superior Court, and of the California appeals court inBell v. Farmers Insurance Exchange. After remand, the plaintiffs filed a motion with the trial court seeking to remove from the case the trial court judge who previously denied their motion for class certification. The trial court denied the motion. In response, plaintiffs’ filed a petition for writ of mandate with the California Court of Appeals requesting review of the trial court’s decision. The California Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in this matter on August  29, 2005, and ruled against the plaintiffs, denying the requested relief. The case is now being returned to the trial court as previously ordered.
      On October 30, 2003, the plaintiffs’ counsel inBurdusisandFrenchfiled a new non-class lawsuit in Orange County, California entitledKris Corso, et al. v.Rent-A-Center, Inc. The plaintiffs’ counsel later amended this complaint to add additional plaintiffs, totaling approximately 339 individuals. The claims made are substantially the same as those inBurdusis. On January  16, 2004, we filed a demurrer to the complaint, arguing, among other things, that the plaintiffs inCorsowere misjoined. On February 19, 2004, the court granted our demurrer on the misjoinder argument, with leave for the plaintiffs to replead. On March 8, 2004, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint inCorso, increasing the number of plaintiffs to approximately 400. The claims in the amended complaint are substantially the same as those inBurdusis. We filed a demurrer with respect to the amended complaint on April 12, 2004, which the court granted on May 6, 2004. However, the court allowed the plaintiffs to again replead the action on a representative basis, which they did on May 26, 2004. We subsequently filed a demurrer with respect to the newly repled action, which the court granted on August 12, 2004. The court subsequently stayed theCorsomatter pending the outcome of theBurdusismatter. On March  16, 2005, the court lifted the stay and on April 12, 2005, we answered the amended

20


complaint. Discovery is now proceeding. On January 30, 2006, theCorsoCourt heard a motion to coordinateCorsowith theBurdusisandFrench actions. TheCorsocourt recommended thatCorsobe coordinated with the other actions before the judge in theBurdusisandFrenchmatters. The Judicial Council has yet to act on the recommendation.
      We believe the claims asserted inBurdusis, FrenchandCorsoare without merit and we intend to vigorously oppose each of these cases. We cannot assure you, however, that we will be found to have no liability in these matters. As of December 31, 2005, we operated 150 stores in California.
Kevin Rose, et al. v.Rent-A-Center, Inc. et al. This matter pending in Clark County, Washington was filed on June 26, 2001, and alleges similar violations of the wage and hour laws of Washington as those inPucci. The same law firm who represented the class inPuccisought to represent the purported class in this matter. On May 14, 2003, theRosecourt denied the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification in that case. On June 3, 2003, the plaintiffs inRosefiled a notice of appeal, which was subsequently denied. Following the denial by the Court of Appeals, the plaintiffs’ counsel filed 14 county-wide putative class actions in Washington with substantially the same claims as inRose. In April 2005, the plaintiffs’ counsel filed another putative county-wide lawsuit and subsequently the plaintiffs’ counsel filed another putative state-wide lawsuit in federal court in Washington, bringing the total to 16. The purported classes in the county-wide class actions ranged from approximately 20 individuals to approximately 100 individuals.
      In November 2005, we reached an agreement in principle to settle for $1.25 million all of the pending lawsuits and related matters bought by the plaintiffs’ counsel in Washington on an agreed state-wide class basis. In connection therewith, the parties agreed to seek class settlement in the Superior Court of Yakima County, Washington, where one of the putative county-wide class actions,Madrigal et al. v.Rent-A-Center, is pending. On January 13, 2006, the court inMadrigalpreliminarily approved the class settlement. The class consists of approximately 1,300 class members, and notice of settlement has now been sent. Objections to the settlement are due March 15, 2006, and a final approval hearing before the court is scheduled for April 21, 2006. Accordingly, at December 31, 2005, approximately $1.3 million was reserved to fund the prospective settlement as well as our attorneys’ fees.
      While we believe that the terms of the prospective settlement are fair, there can be no assurance that the settlement, if completed, will be finally approved by the court in its present form.
Item 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
 
None.


17

21


PART II
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
 
Our common stock has been listed on the Nasdaq StockGlobal Select Market® and its predecessors under the symbol “RCII” since January 25, 1995, the date we commenced our initial public offering. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales price per share of the common stock as reported.
         
2005 High Low
     
Fourth Quarter $20.360  $14.900 
Third Quarter  24.360   17.910 
Second Quarter  27.750   22.360 
First Quarter  27.890   24.080 
         
2004 High Low
     
Fourth Quarter $26.890  $22.000 
Third Quarter  31.600   24.700 
Second Quarter  33.930   27.630 
First Quarter  33.342   27.030 
 
         
2008
 High  Low 
 
Fourth Quarter $22.68  $9.97 
Third Quarter  26.00   18.60 
Second Quarter  23.20   17.07 
First Quarter  20.22   11.67 
         
2007
 High  Low 
 
Fourth Quarter $18.59  $13.17 
Third Quarter  27.06   16.85 
Second Quarter  29.01   25.90 
First Quarter  31.09   26.32 
As of March 8, 2006,February 20, 2009, there were approximately 9451 record holders of our common stock.
 
We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock since the time of our initial public offering. Any change in our dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on a number of factors, including future earnings, capital requirements, contractual restrictions, financial condition, future prospects and any other factors our Board of Directors may deem relevant.
 
Cash dividend payments are subject to the restrictions in our senior credit facilities and the indenture governing our subordinated notes. These restrictions would not currently prohibit the payment of cash dividends. Please see the section entitled “Management’s“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations  Liquidity and Capital Resources — Senior Credit Facilities” on page 3835 of this report for further discussion of such restrictions.
 
Under our common stock repurchase program, we are authorized to repurchase up to $400.0$500.0 million in aggregate purchase price of our common stock. As of December 31, 2005,2008, we had repurchased $356.1a total of 19,412,750 shares ofRent-A-Center common stock for an aggregate of $457.8 million inunder our common stock repurchase program. For the year ended December 31, 2008, we repurchased 951,800 shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of our common stock under our stock repurchase program.$13.4 million. In the fourth quarter of 2005,2008, we madeeffected the following repurchases of our common stock:
                 
        Maximum Dollar
        Value of Shares
      Total Number of that May Yet Be
      Shares Purchased as Purchased Under
  Total Number Average Price Part of Publicly the Plans or
  of Shares Paid per Share Announced Plans or Programs
Period Purchased (including fees) Programs (including fees)
         
October 1 through October 31  0  $0.0000   0  $78,358,403 
November 1 through November 30  1,816,100  $18.9807   1,816,100  $43,887,581 
December 1 through December 31  0  $0.0000   0  $43,887,581 
             
Total  1,816,100  $18.9807   1,816,100  $43,887,581 
             
                 
           Maximum Dollar
 
        Total Number of
  Value that May Yet
 
        Shares Purchased
  Be Purchased
 
  Total Number
  Average Price
  as Part of Publicly
  Under the Plans
 
  of Shares
  Paid per Share
  Announced Plans
  or Programs
 
Period
 Purchased  (Including Fees)  or Programs  (Including Fees) 
 
October 1 through October 31  150,000  $14.0456   150,000  $50,422,839 
November 1 through November 30  651,800  $12.5574   651,800  $42,237,933 
December 1 through December 31                
                 
Total  801,800  $12.8358   801,800  $42,237,933 


18

22


Stock Performance Graph
The following chart represents a comparison of the five year total return of our common stock to the NASDAQ Market Index and a peer group index selected by us. The peer group index consists of Aaron Rents, Inc., Family Dollar Stores, Inc., 99¢ Only Stores, Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., Dollar Financial Corp., Advance America, Cash Advance Centers, Inc., EZCORP, Inc., and Cash America International, Inc. The graph assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 2003 and dividends, if any, were reinvested for all years ending December 31.


19


Item 6.Selected Financial Data.Data
 
The selected financial data presented below for the five years ended December 31, 20052008 have been derived from our consolidated financial statements as audited by Grant Thornton LLP, independent registered public accounting firm. All prices and amounts have been adjusted to reflect the 5-for-2 split of our common stock effected in August 2003. The historical financial data are qualified in their entirety by, and should be read in conjunction with, the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, the section entitled “Management’sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”Operations and other financial information included in this report.
                       
  Year Ended December 31,
   
  2005 2004 2003 2002 2001
           
  (In thousands, except per share data)
Consolidated Statements of Earnings
                    
Revenues                    
 Store                    
  Rentals and fees $2,084,757  $2,071,866  $1,998,952  $1,828,534  $1,650,851 
  Merchandise sales  177,292   166,594   152,984   115,478   94,733 
  Installment sales  26,139   24,304   22,203   6,137    
  Other  7,903   3,568   3,083   2,589   3,476 
 Franchise                    
  Merchandise sales  37,794   41,398   45,057   51,514   53,584 
  Royalty income and fees  5,222   5,525   5,871   5,792   5,884 
                
 Total revenue  2,339,107   2,313,255   2,228,150   2,010,044   1,808,528 
Operating expenses                    
 Direct store expenses                    
  Cost of rentals and fees  452,583   450,035   432,696   383,400   343,197 
  Cost of merchandise sold  129,624   119,098   112,283   84,628   72,539 
  Cost of installment sales  10,889   10,512   10,639   3,776    
  Salaries and other expenses  1,358,760(1)  1,277,926   1,180,115   1,070,265   1,019,402 
 Franchise cost of merchandise sold  36,319   39,472   43,248   49,185   51,251 
                
   1,988,175   1,897,043   1,778,981   1,591,254   1,486,389 
 General and administrative expenses  82,290   75,481   66,635   63,296   55,359 
 Amortization of intangibles  11,705(2)  10,780   12,512   5,045   30,194 
 Class action litigation settlement (reversion)  (8,000)(3)  47,000(6)        52,000(8)
 Restructuring charge  15,166(4)            
                
  Total operating expenses  2,089,336   2,030,304   1,858,128   1,659,595   1,623,942 
                
Operating profit  249,771   282,951   370,022   350,449   184,586 
Income from sale of charged off accounts   —   (7,924)(7)         
Finance charges from refinancing   —   4,173   35,260       
Interest expense, net  40,703   35,323   43,932   62,006   59,780 
                
Earnings before income taxes  209,068   251,379   290,830   288,443   124,806 
Income tax expense  73,330(5)  95,524   109,334   116,270   58,589 
                
                    ��
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004 
     (In thousands, except per share data)    
 
Consolidated Statements of Earnings
                    
Revenues                    
Store                    
Rentals and fees $2,505,268  $2,594,061  $2,174,239(7) $2,084,757  $2,071,866 
Merchandise sales  256,731   208,989   175,954   177,292   166,594 
Installment sales  41,193   34,576   26,877   26,139   24,304 
Other  42,759   25,482   15,607   7,903   3,568 
Franchise                    
Merchandise sales  33,283   34,229   36,377   37,794   41,398 
Royalty income and fees  4,938   8,784(4)  4,854   5,222   5,525 
                     
Total revenue  2,884,172   2,906,121   2,433,908   2,339,107   2,313,255 
Operating expenses                    
Direct store expenses                    
Cost of rentals and fees  572,900   574,013   476,462(7)  452,583   450,035 
Cost of merchandise sold  194,595   156,503   131,428   129,624   119,098 
Cost of installment sales  16,620   13,270   11,346   10,889   10,512 
Salaries and other expenses  1,651,805   1,684,965   1,385,437(8)  1,358,760(11)  1,277,926 
Franchise cost of merchandise sold  31,705   32,733   34,862   36,319   39,472 
                     
   2,467,625   2,461,484   2,039,535   1,988,175   1,897,043 
General and administrative expenses  125,632   123,703   93,556   82,290   75,481 
Amortization and write-down of intangibles  16,637   15,734   5,573   11,705(12)  10,780 
Litigation expense (credit)  (4,607)(1)  62,250(5)  73,300(9)  (8,000)(13)  47,000(16)
Restructuring charge  4,497(2)  38,713(6)     15,166(14)   
                     
Total operating expenses  2,609,784   2,701,884   2,211,964   2,089,336   2,030,304 
                     
Operating profit  274,388   204,237   221,944   249,771   282,951 
Income from sale of charged off accounts              (7,924)(17)
Finance charges from refinancing        4,803(10)     4,173 
Gain on extinguishment of debt  (4,335)(3)            
Interest expense, net  57,381   87,951   53,003   40,703   35,323 
                     
Earnings before income taxes  221,342   116,286   164,138   209,068   251,379 
Income tax expense  81,718   40,018   61,046   73,330(15)  95,524 
                     


20

23


                     
Item 6.  Selected Financial Data — Continued
    
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004 
  (In thousands, except per share data) 
 
NET EARNINGS $139,624  $76,268  $103,092  $135,738  $155,855 
                     
Basic earnings per common share $2.10  $1.11  $1.48  $1.86  $1.99 
                     
Diluted earnings per common share $2.08  $1.10  $1.46  $1.83  $1.94 
                     
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data
                    
Rental merchandise, net $819,054  $937,970  $1,056,233(18) $750,680  $759,111 
Intangible assets, net  1,266,953   1,269,094   1,281,597   929,326   922,404 
Total assets  2,496,702   2,626,943   2,740,956(18)  1,948,664   1,967,788 
Total debt  947,087   1,259,335   1,293,278   724,050   708,250 
Total liabilities(19)
  1,417,500   1,679,852   1,797,997(18)  1,125,232   1,173,517 
Stockholders’ equity  1,079,202   947,091   942,959(18)  823,432   794,271 
Operating Data (Unaudited)
                    
Stores open at end of period  3,037   3,081   3,406   2,760   2,875 
Comparable store revenue growth (decrease)(20)
  2.3%  2.1%  1.9%  (2.3)%  (3.6)%
Weighted average number of stores  3,056   3,376   2,848   2,844   2,788 
Franchise stores open at end of period  222   227   282   296   313 
Item 6.  (1)Selected Financial Data — Continued
                      
  Year Ended December 31,
   
  2005 2004 2003 2002 2001
           
  (In thousands, except per share data)
NET EARNINGS  135,738   155,855   181,496   172,173   66,217 
Preferred dividends   —         10,212   15,408 
                
Net earnings allocable to common stockholders $135,738  $155,855  $181,496  $161,961  $50,809 
                
Basic earnings per common share $1.86  $1.99  $2.16  $2.20  $0.79 
                
Diluted earnings per common share $1.83  $1.94  $2.08  $1.89  $0.71 
                
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data
                    
 Rental merchandise, net $750,680  $759,111  $680,700  $631,724  $653,701 
 Intangible assets, net  929,326   922,404   797,434   743,852   711,096 
 Total assets  1,948,664   1,967,788   1,831,302   1,626,652   1,630,315 
 Total debt  724,050   708,250   698,000   521,330   702,506 
 
Total liabilities(9)
  1,125,232   1,173,517   1,036,472   784,252   1,224,937 
 Stockholders’ equity  823,432   794,271   794,830   842,400   405,378 
Operating Data
                    
 Stores open at end of period  2,760   2,875   2,648   2,407   2,281 
 
Comparable store revenue growth (decrease)(10)
  (2.3)%  (3.6)%  3.0%  6.0%  8.0%
 Weighted average number of stores  2,844   2,788   2,560   2,325   2,235 
 Franchise stores open at end of period  296   313   329   318   342 
Includes the effects of a $4.6 million in pre-tax litigation credits recorded in the fourth quarter of 2008 related to thePerezmatter and theShafer/Johnsonmatter
 
(1)  (2)Includes the effects of a $4.5 million pre-tax restructuring expense as part of the store consolidation plan and other restructuring items announced December 3, 2007.
  (3)Includes the effects of a $4.3 million pre-tax gain on the extinguishment of debt recorded in the fourth quarter of 2008.
  (4)Includes the effects of a $3.9 million pre-tax benefit recorded in the third quarter of 2007 as a result of the receipt of accelerated royalty payments from franchisees in consideration of the termination of their franchise agreements.
  (5)Includes the effects of a $51.3 million pre-tax litigation expense recorded in the first quarter of 2007 related to thePerezmatter and the effects of an $11.0 million pre-tax litigation expense recorded in the fourth quarter of 2007 related to theShafer/Johnsonmatter.
  (6)Includes the effects of a $38.7 million pre-tax restructuring expense recorded in the fourth quarter of 2007 related to the store consolidation plan and other restructuring items announced December 3, 2007.
  (7)Includes the effects of adopting SAB 108,Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements(“SAB 108”), of approximately $3.1 million decrease in pre-tax revenue and $738,000 decrease in pre-tax depreciation expense related to adjustments for deferred revenue.
  (8)Includes the effects of adopting SFAS 123R,Share-Based Payment(“SFAS 123R”), of approximately $7.8 million of pre-tax expense related to stock options and restricted stock units granted.
  (9)Includes the effects of a $4.95 million pre-tax expense in the third quarter of 2006 associated with the settlement of theBurdusis/French/Corsolitigation, the effects of a $10.35 million pre-tax expense in the third quarter of 2006 associated with the settlement with the California Attorney General and the effects of a $58.0 million pre-tax expense in the fourth quarter of 2006 associated with the litigation reserve with respect to thePerezcase.
(10)Includes the effects of a $2.2 million pre-tax expense in the third quarter of 2006 and the effects of a $2.6 million pre-tax expense in the fourth quarter of 2006 for the refinancing of our senior credit facilities.
(11)Includes the effects of $5.2 million in charges recorded in the third and fourth quarters of 2005 as a result of Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma. These charges were primarily related to the disposal of inventory and fixed assets.
 
(2)(12)Includes the effects of $3.7 million in goodwill impairment charges recorded in the third quarter of 2005 as result of Hurricane Katrina.
 
(3)(13)Includes the effect of a pre-tax legal reversion of $8.0 million recorded in the first quarter of 2005 associated with the settlement of a class action lawsuit in the state of California.

21


(4)(14)Includes the effects of a $15.2 million pre-tax restructuring expense as part of the store consolidation plan announced September 6, 2005.
 
(5)(15)Includes the effects of a $2.0 million tax audit reserve credit associated with the examination and favorable resolution of our 1998 and 1999 federal tax returns and a $3.3 million state tax reserve credit due to a change in estimate related to potential loss exposures.
 
(6)(16)Includes the effects of a pre-tax legal settlement charge of $47.0 million recorded in the third quarter of 2004 associated with the settlement of a class action lawsuit in the state of California.
 
(7)(17)Includes the effects of $7.9 million in pre-tax income associated with the 2004 sale of previously charged off accounts.
 
(8)(18)Includes the effects of adopting SAB 108 of a pre-tax legal settlement charge$4.2 million increase in accounts receivable, an increase in accrued liabilities of $52.0$31.0 million, associated with the 2001 settlementa decrease in accumulated depreciation of class action lawsuits$6.4 million, an increase in the statesdeferred tax assets of Missouri, Illinois,$7.6 million and Tennessee.a decrease in retained earnings of $12.8 million related to adjustments for deferred revenue and a $1.0 million increase in prepaid expenses, a $1.9 million decrease in accrued liabilities, a decrease in deferred tax assets of $1.1 million and an increase in retained earnings of $1.8 million related to adjustments for property taxes.
 
(9)(19)In accordance with the adoption of SFAS No. 150,Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity(“SFAS 150”), total liabilities also includes redeemable convertible voting preferred stock.
stock for the years ended December 31, 2002 through December 31, 2005.
(10)(20)Comparable store revenue growth for each period presented includes revenues only of stores open throughout the full period and the comparable prior period.


22

24


Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Overview
 
We are the largestrent-to-own operator in the United States rent-to-own industry with an approximate 33%38% market share based on store count. At December 31, 2005,2008, we operated 2,7603,037 company-owned stores nationwide and in Canada and Puerto Rico, including 2131 retail installment sales stores in Wisconsin operated by our subsidiary Get It Now, LLC under the namenames “Get It Now” and seven“Home Choice” and eight rent-to-own stores located in Canada operated by our subsidiary Rent-A-Centre, Ltd., under the name “Rent-A-Centre.“Rent-A-Centre. Another of our subsidiaries, Our subsidiary, ColorTyme, is a national franchisor ofrent-to-own rent-to-own stores. At December 31, 2005,2008, ColorTyme had 296222 franchised rent-to-own stores in 38 states, 288 of which operated under the ColorTyme name and eight34 states. These franchise stores of which operated under theRent-A-Center name.represent an additional 3% market share based on store count.
 
Our stores generally offer high quality durable products such as major consumer electronics, appliances, computers, and furniture and accessories under flexible rental purchase agreements that generally allow the customer to obtain ownership of the merchandise at the conclusion of anagreed-upon rental period. TheseThe rental purchase agreements are designed to appeal totransaction is a wide variety of customers by allowing themflexible alternative for consumers to obtain use and enjoyment of brand name merchandise that they might otherwise be unable to obtain due to insufficient cash resources or a lackwithout incurring debt. Key features of access to credit. These agreements also cater to customers who only have a temporary need, or who simply desire to rent rather thanthe rental purchase the merchandise. transaction include:
• convenient payment options — in-store or over the phone;
• no long-term obligations;
• right to terminate without penalty;
• no requirement of a credit history;
• set-up and delivery included at no additional charge;
• product maintenance;
• lifetime reinstatement; and
• flexible options to obtain ownership — 90 days same as cash, early purchase options, or payment through the term of the agreement.
Rental payments are made generally on a weekly basis and, together with applicable fees, constitute our primary revenue source.
 
Our expenses primarily relate to merchandise costs and the operations of our stores, including salaries and benefits for our employees, occupancy expense for our leased real estate, advertising expenses, lost, damaged, or stolen merchandise, fixed asset depreciation, and corporate and other expenses.
 In 2005,
From 1993 to 2006, we began offering financial services products, such as short term secured and unsecured loans, bill paying, debit cards, check cashing and money transfer services in our existingrent-to-own stores under the trade name “The Cash AdvantEdge.” As of December 31, 2005, we offered some or all of these financial services products in 40Rent-A-Center store locations in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Utah and Washington. We expect to offer such financial services products in 140 to 200Rent-A-Center store locations by the end of 2006.
      We plan to continue growing through selective and opportunistic acquisitions of existingrent-to-own stores, and development of newrent-to-own stores, as well as offering financial services products designed to appeal to our customer demographic.
      We have pursued an aggressive growth strategy since 1993. We havein which we sought to acquire underperformingrent-to-own rent-to-own stores to which we could apply our operating model as well as open new stores. As a result, the acquired stores have generally experienced more significant revenue growth during the initial periods following their acquisition than in subsequent periods. Typically, a newly openedrent-to-own rent-to-own store is profitable on a monthly basis in the ninth to twelfth month after its initial opening. Historically, a typical store has achieved cumulative break-even profitability in 18 to 24 months after its initial opening. Total financing requirements of a typical new store approximate $500,000, with roughly 75% of that amount relating to the purchase of rental merchandise inventory. A newly opened store historically has achieved results consistent with other stores that have been operating within the system for greater than two years by the end of its third year of operation. As a result, our quarterly earnings are impacted by how many new stores we opened during a particular quarter and the quarters preceding it. Because of significant growth since our formation, our historical results of operations andperiod-to-period period-to-period comparisons of such results and other financial data, including the rate of earnings growth, may not be meaningful or indicative of future results.
 
In addition, we strategically open or acquire stores near market areas served by existing stores (“cannibalize”) to enhance service levels, gain incremental sales and increase market penetration. This planned cannibalization may negatively impact our same store revenue and cause us to grow at a slower rate. There can be no assurance that we will open any newrent-to-own rent-to-own stores in the future, or as to the number, location or profitability thereof.


23

25


We also offer financial services products, such as short term secured and unsecured loans, debit cards, check cashing, tax preparation and money transfer services, in some of our existing rent-to-own stores under the trade names “RAC Financial Services” and “Cash AdvantEdge.” As of December 31, 2008, we offered some or all of these financial services products in 351Rent-A-Center store locations in 18 states. We intend to focus our resources on improving the operations in these existing financial services store locations and do not plan to add significantly to the number ofRent-A-Center store locations offering financial services at this time. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in our efforts to improve and expand our financial services operations or that such operations, should they be added, will prove to be profitable.
The following discussion focuses on our results of operations, and issues related to our liquidity and capital resources. You should read this discussion in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.
Forward-Looking Statements
 
The statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this report are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “would,” “expect,” “intend,” “could,” “estimate,” “should,” “anticipate” or “believe.” We believe the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are accurate. However, we cannot assure you that suchthese expectations will occur. Our actual future performance could differ materially from such statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to suchthese differences include, but are not limited to:
 • uncertainties regarding ourthe ability to open newrent-to-own rent-to-own stores;
 
 • our ability to acquire additionalrent-to-own rent-to-own stores or customer accounts on favorable terms;
 
 • our ability to enhance the performance of these acquired stores;control costs and increase profitability;
 
 • our ability to control store level costs;
• successfully add financial services locations within our ability to identify and successfully market products and services that appeal to our customer demographic;existing rent-to-own stores;
 
 • our ability to identify and successfully enter into new lines of business offering products and services that appeal to our customer demographic, including our financial services products;
 
 • our ability to enhance the resultsperformance of our litigation;acquired stores;
 
 • our ability to retain the passage of legislation adversely affecting therent-to-own or financial services industries;revenue associated with acquired customer accounts;
 
 • interest rates;our ability to identify and successfully market products and services that appeal to our customer demographic;
 
 • our ability to enter into new and collect on our rental purchase agreements;
 
 • our ability to enter into new and collect on our short term loans;
 
 • the passage of legislation adversely affecting the rent-to-own or financial services industries;
• our failure to comply with statutes or regulations governing the rent-to-own or financial services industries;
• interest rates;
• increases in the unemployment rate;
• economic pressures, such as high fuel and utility costs, affecting the disposable income available to our targeted consumers, such as high fuelconsumers;
• changes in our stock price and utility costs;the number of shares of common stock that we may or may not repurchase;
• changes in estimates relating to self-insurance liabilities and income tax and litigation reserves;
 
 • changes in our effective tax rate;
 
 • our ability to maintain an effective system of internal controls;


24


 • changes in the number of share-based compensation grants, methods used to value future share-based payments and changes in estimated forfeiture rates with respect to share-based compensation;
 
 • changes in our stock price and the numberresolution of shares of common stock that we may or may not repurchase;any material litigation; and
 
 • the other risks detailed from time to time in our SEC reports.
 
Additional important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our expectations are discussed under the section entitled “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report. You should not unduly rely on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. Except as required by law, we are not obligated to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Critical Accounting Policies Involving Critical Estimates, Uncertainties or Assessments in Our Financial Statements
 
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported

26


amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent losses and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. In applying accounting principles, we must often make individual estimates and assumptions regarding expected outcomes or uncertainties. Our estimates, judgments and assumptions are continually evaluated based on available information and experience. Because of the use of estimates inherent in the financial reporting process, actual results could differ from those estimates. We believe the following are areas where the degree of judgment and complexity in determining amounts recorded in our consolidated financial statements make the accounting policies critical.
 
Self-Insurance Liabilities.  We have self-insured retentions with respect to losses under our workers’ compensation, general liability and auto liability insurance policies. We establish reserves for our liabilities associated with these losses by obtaining forecasts for the ultimate expected losses and estimating amounts needed to pay losses within our self-insured retentions.
 
We continually institute procedures to manage our loss exposure and increases in health care costs associated with our insurance claims through a greater focus on the risk management function, a transitional duty program for injured workers, ongoing safety and accident prevention training, and various programs designed to minimize losses and improve our loss experience in our store locations. We make assumptions on our liabilities within our self-insured retentions using actuarial loss forecasts, which are prepared using methods and assumptions in accordance with standard actuarial practice,company specific development factors, general industry loss development factors, and third party claim administrator loss estimates which are based on known facts surrounding individual claims. During 2005, each quarterThese assumptions incorporate expected increases in health care costs. Periodically, we reevaluatedreevaluate our estimate of liability within our self-insured retentions, including our assumptions related to our loss forecasts and estimates, using actuarial loss forecasts updated during the quarter and currently valued third party claim administrator loss estimates. Weretentions. At that time, we evaluate the adequacy of our accruals by comparing amounts accrued on our balance sheet for anticipated losses to our updated actuarial loss forecasts and third party claim administrator loss estimates, and make adjustments to our accruals as needed based upon such review.needed.
 Over the previous 10 years, our loss exposure has increased, primarily as a result of our growth. We instituted procedures to manage our loss exposure through a greater focus on the risk management function, a transitional duty program for injured workers, ongoing safety and accident prevention training, and various programs designed to minimize losses and improve our loss experience in our store locations.
As of December 31, 2005,2008, the net amount accrued for losses within our self-insured retentions with respect to workers’ compensation, general liability and auto liability insurance was $97.0$117.9 million, as compared to $87.2$109.5 million at December 31, 2004. The increase in2007. If any of the netfactors that contribute to the overall cost of insurance claims were to change, the actual amount accruedincurred for our self-insurance liability would be directly affected. While we believe our loss prevention programs will reduce our total cost for self-insurance claims, our actual cost could be greater than the 2005 period is a result of an estimate for new claims expected for the current policy period, which incorporates our store growth, increased number of employees, increases in health care costs, and the net effect of prior period claims which have closed or for which additional development or changes in estimates have occurred.amounts currently accrued.
 
Litigation Reserves.  We are the subject of litigation in the ordinary course of our business. OurHistorically, our litigation involves, among other things, actions relating to claims that our rental purchase agreements constitute installment sales contracts, violate state usury laws or violate other state laws to protect consumers, claims asserting violations of wage and hour laws in our employment practices, as well as claims we violated the federal securities laws.has involved lawsuits alleging various regulatory violations. In preparing our financial statements at a given point in time, we account for theseloss contingencies pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No. 5 and FIN 14, which requiresrequire that we accrue for losses that are both probable and reasonably estimable.
 
Each quarter, we make estimates of our probable liabilities,losses, if reasonably estimable, and record such amounts in our consolidated financial statements. These amounts represent our best estimate, or may be the minimum range of probable loss when no single best estimate is determinable. We, together with our counsel, monitor developments


25


related to these legal matters and, when appropriate, adjustments are made to reflect current facts and circumstances. As of December 31, 2005, we had accrued $4.5 million relating to our outstanding litigation, of which $1.9 million was related to the settlement of thePucci/ Chessmatter (which was funded in February 2006), approximately $1.3 million related to the prospective settlement of theRose/ Madrigalmatters, and an additional $1.3 million for anticipatedWe expense legal fees and expenses with respect to our other outstanding litigation, as compared to $49.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, of which we had accrued $47.0 millionincurred in connection with the settlementdefense of all of our litigation at theGriego/ Carrillomatter, and an additional $2.0 million time such amounts are invoiced or otherwise made known to us.
Our accruals relating to probable losses for probableour outstanding litigation costsfollow:
         
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2008  2007 
  (In millions) 
 
Shafer/Johnson Matter
 $1.8  $11.0 
California Attorney General Settlement
  9.4   9.6 
Other Litigation
  0.1   1.1 
Legal Fees and Expenses
     0.2 
         
Total Accrual $11.3  $21.9 
         
As with respect to our other outstanding litigation.

27


      Themost litigation, the ultimate outcome of our pending litigation is uncertain, and the amount of loss we may incur, if any, cannot in our judgment be reasonably estimated.uncertain. Additional developments in our litigation or other adverse or positive developments or rulings in our litigation could affect our assumptions and, thus, our accrual. Our estimates with respect to accrual for our litigation expenses reflect our judgment as to the appropriate accounting charge at the end of a period under SFAS No. 5 and FIN 14. Factors that we consider in evaluating our litigation reserves include:
 
• the procedural status of the matter;
• our views and the views of our counsel as to the probability of a loss in the matter;
• the relative strength of the parties’ arguments with respect to liability and damages in the matter;
• settlement discussions, if any, between the parties;
• how we intend to defend ourselves in the matter; and
• our experience.
Significant factors that may cause us to increase or decrease our accrual with respect to a matter include:
• judgments or finding of liability against us in the matter by a trial court;
• the granting of, or declining to grant, a motion for class certification in the matter;
• definitive decisions by appellate courts in the requisite jurisdiction interpreting or otherwise providing guidance as to applicable law;
• favorable or unfavorable decisions as the matter progresses;
• settlements agreed to in principle by the parties in the matter, subject to court approval; and
• final settlement of the matter.
Income Taxes.  Our annual tax rate is affected by many factors, including the mix of our earnings, legislation and acquisitions, and is based on our income, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available to us in the jurisdictions in which we operate. Tax Reserves. Welaws are complex and subject to federal, state, localdiffering interpretations between the taxpayer and foreign income taxes.the taxing authorities. Significant judgment is required in determining our tax expense, evaluating our tax positions and evaluating uncertainties under FASB Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109(“FIN 48”). As required by FIN 48, which we adopted January 1, 2007, we recognize the financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely than not sustain the position following an audit. For tax positions meeting the more-likely-than not threshold, the amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon the ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority. We estimatereview our tax positions quarterly and adjust the balance as new information becomes available.


26


Prior to 2007, we estimated our liabilities for income tax exposure by evaluating our income tax reserves each quarterexposure based on the information available to us, and establishing reserves in accordance with the criteria for accrual under SFAS No. 5. In estimating this liability, we evaluateevaluated a number of factors in ascertaining whether we may have to pay additional taxes and interest when all examinations by taxing authorities are concluded. The actual amount accrued as a liability iswas based on an evaluation of the underlying facts and circumstances, a thorough researchanalysis of the technical merits of our arguments,tax positions taken, and an assessment of the chances of us prevailing in our arguments. We consult with external tax advisers in researching our conclusions. At December 31, 2005, we had accrued $4.9 million relating to our contingent liabilities for income taxes, as compared to $7.7 million at December 31, 2004. The decrease in the amount accrued for the 2005 period primarily relates to the reversal of a $3.3 million state tax reserve in connection with a change in estimate as well as a $2.0 million tax audit reserve associated with the favorable resolution of our 1998 and 1999 federal tax returns offset slightly by our normal tax accruals.positions taken.
 
If we make changes to our accruals in any of these areaswith respect to our self-insurance liabilities, or litigation or income tax reserves in accordance with the policies described above, these changes would impact our earnings. Increases to our accruals would reduce earnings and, similarly, reductions to our accruals would increase our earnings. A pre-tax change of $1.1 million in our estimates would result in a corresponding $0.01 change in our earnings per common share.
 
Stock-Based Compensation Expense.  We account for stock-based compensation expense under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123,Share-Based Payment(“SFAS 123R”), and recognize share-based payment awards to our employees and directors at the estimated fair value on the grant date. Determining the fair value of any share-based awards requires information about several variables including, but not limited to, expected stock volatility over the terms of the awards, expected dividend yields and the predicted employee exercise behavior. We base expected life on historical exercise and post-vesting employment-termination experience, and expected volatility on historical realized volatility trends. In addition, all stock-based compensation expense is recorded net of an estimated forfeiture rate. The forfeiture rate is based upon historical activity and is analyzed at least quarterly as actual forfeitures occur. Stock options granted during the twelve months ended December 31, 2008 were valued using the binomial method pricing model with the following assumptions for employee options: expected volatility of 33.85% to 53.58%, a risk-free interest rate of 1.62% to 3.17%, no dividend yield, and an expected life of 4.20 years. For non-employee director options, the stock options granted during the twelve months ended December 31, 2008 were valued using the binomial method pricing model with the following assumptions: expected volatility of 41.26%, a risk-free interest rate of 3.54%, no dividend yield, and an expected life of 6.90 years. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, we recognized $3.3 million in pre-tax compensation expense related to stock options and restricted stock units granted.
Based on an assessment of our accounting policies and the underlying judgments and uncertainties affecting the application of those policies, we believe that our consolidated financial statements fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of our company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. However, we do not suggest that other general risk factors, such as those discussed elsewhere in this report as well as changes in our growth objectives or performance of new or acquired stores, could not adversely impact our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows in future periods.
Significant Accounting Policies
 
Our significant accounting policies are summarized below and in Note A to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein.in this report.
 
Revenue.  Merchandise is rented to customers pursuant to rental-purchaserental purchase agreements which provide for weekly, semi-monthly or monthly rental terms with non-refundable rental payments. Generally, the customer has the right to acquire title either through a purchase option or through payment of all required rentals. Rental revenue and fees are recognized over the rental term as payments are received and merchandise sales revenue is recognized when the customer exercises theirthe purchase option and pays the cash price due. Cash received prior to the period in which it should be recognized is deferred and recognized according to the rental term. Revenue is accrued for uncollected amounts due based on historical collection experience. However, the total amount of the rental purchase agreement is not accrued because the customer can terminate the rental agreement at any time and we cannot enforce collection for non-payment of future rents. Because Get It Now makes
Revenue from the sale of merchandise in our retail sales on an installment credit basis, Get It Now’s revenuestores is recognized atwhen the time of such retail sale, asinstallment note is signed, the costcustomer has taken possession of the merchandise sold, net of a provision for uncollectible accounts. and collectability is reasonably assured.


27


The revenue from our financial services is recorded differently depending on the type of transaction. Fees collected on loans are recognized ratably over the term of the loan. For money orders, wire transfers, check cashing and other customer service type transactions, fee revenue is recognized at the time of the transactions.service is performed.
 
Franchise Revenue.  Revenue from the sale of rental merchandise is recognized upon shipment of the merchandise to the franchisee. Franchise fee revenue is recognized upon completion of substantially all services and satisfaction of all material conditions required under the terms of the franchise agreement.
 
Depreciation of Rental Merchandise.  Depreciation of rental merchandise is included in the cost of rentals and fees on our statement of earnings. We depreciate our rental merchandise using the income forecasting method. Under the income forecasting method, merchandise held for rent is not depreciated and

28


merchandise on rent is depreciated in the proportion of rents received to total rents provided in the rental contract, which is an activity-based method similar to the units of production method. On computers that are 24 months old or older and which have become idle, depreciation is recognized using the straight-line method for a period of at least six months, generally not to exceed an aggregate depreciation period of 3630 months. The purpose is to better reflect the depreciable life of a computer in our stores and to encourage the sale of older computers.
 
Cost of Merchandise Sold.  Cost of merchandise sold represents the net book value net of accumulated depreciation of rental merchandise at time of sale. Cost of merchandise sold also includes the cost of services offered by us, such as prepaid telephone and electric services.
 
Salaries and Other Expenses.  Salaries and other expenses include all salaries and wages paid to store level employees, together with marketdistrict managers’ salaries, travel and occupancy, including any related benefits and taxes, as well as all store level general and administrative expenses and selling, advertising, insurance, occupancy, delivery, fixed asset depreciation and other operating expenses.
 
General and Administrative Expenses.  General and administrative expenses include all corporate overhead expenses related to our headquarters such as salaries, taxes and benefits, occupancy, administrative and other operating expenses.


28


Results of Operations
 
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, historical Consolidated Statements of Earnings data as a percentage of total store and franchise revenues.
                          
  Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
     
  2005 2004 2003 2005 2004 2003
             
  (Company-owned stores only) (Franchise operations only)
Revenues
                        
Rentals and fees  90.8%  91.4%  91.8%  %  %  %
Merchandise Sales  8.9   8.4   8.0   87.9   88.2   88.5 
Other/ Royalty income and fees  0.3   0.2   0.2   12.1   11.8   11.5 
                   
   100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%
                   
Operating Expenses
                        
Direct store expenses                        
 Cost of rentals and fees  19.7%  19.9%  19.9%  %  %  %
 Cost of merchandise sold  6.1   5.7   5.6   84.4   84.1   84.9 
 Salaries and other expenses  59.2   56.4   54.2          
                   
   85.0   82.0   79.7   84.4   84.1   84.9 
General and administrative expenses  3.5   3.2   3.1   6.6   6.3   4.1 
Amortization of intangibles  0.5   0.5   0.1   0.7   0.6   0.6 
Class action litigation (reversion)  (0.3)               
Restructuring charge  0.7   2.1             
                   
Total operating expenses  89.4   87.8   82.9   91.7   91.0   89.6 
                   
Operating profit  10.6   12.2   17.1   8.3   9.0   10.4 
Interest, net and other income  1.8   1.4   3.7   (1.0)  (0.9)  (1.1)
                   
Earnings before income taxes  8.8%  10.8%  13.4%  9.3%  9.9%  11.5%
                   
                         
  Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
  2008  2007  2006  2008  2007  2006 
  (Company-owned stores only)  (Franchise operations only) 
 
Revenues
                        
Rentals and fees  88.0%  90.6%  90.9%  %  %  %
Merchandise sales  10.5   8.5   8.5   87.1   79.6   88.2 
Other/Royalty income and fees  1.5   0.9   0.6   12.9   20.4   11.8 
                         
   100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%
                         
Operating Expenses
                        
Direct store expenses                        
Cost of rentals and fees  20.1%  20.0%  19.9%  %  %  %
Cost of merchandise sold  7.5   5.9   6.0   83.0   76.1   84.6 
Salaries and other expenses  58.0   58.9   57.9          
                         
   85.6   84.8   83.8   83.0   76.1   84.6 
General and administrative expenses  4.3   4.3   3.9   10.3   7.8   9.1 
Amortization and write-down of intangibles  0.6   0.5   0.2         0.4 
Litigation expense (credit)  (0.2)  2.2   3.1          
Restructuring charge  0.2   1.4             
                         
Total operating expenses  90.5   93.2   91.0   93.3   83.9   94.1 
                         
Operating profit  9.5   6.8   9.0   6.7   16.1   5.9 
Interest, net and other income  1.9   3.1   2.4   (1.6)  (1.6)  (1.4)
                         
Earnings before income taxes  7.6%  3.7%  6.6%  8.3%  17.7%  7.3%
                         
Overview of 2005 Results
 Total revenue
2008 Overview
Highlights of our operating results for the year ended December 31, 2005 increased slightly, while net earnings decreased from2008 include:
• Generated $384.7 million in operating cash flow.
• Reduced outstanding indebebtedness, including our subordinated notes and senior term loans, by $312.2 million.
• Repurchased 951,800 shares of our common stock for an aggregate of $13.4 million.
• Increased same store revenues by 2.3%.
Comparison of the prior year primarily due to a decrease in same store sales, the impact of expenses related to our store

29


consolidation plan and an increase in our salaries and other expenses, some of which related to expenses incurred as a result of Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma. We generated $187.9 million in operating cash flow, with $57.6 million in cash on hand at December 31, 2005. Same store revenues for the twelve month periodYears ended December 31, 2005 decreased 2.3%, compared to a decrease of 3.6% for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2004. In addition, we repurchased 5,900,700 shares of our common stock for an aggregate of $118.4 million.
Store Consolidation Plan2008 and 2007
 On September 6, 2005, we announced our plan to close up to 162 stores by December 31, 2005. The decision to close these stores was based on management’s analysis and evaluation of the markets in which we operate, including our market share, operating results, competitive positioning and growth potential for the affected stores. The 162 stores included 114 stores that we intended to close and merge with our existing stores and up to 48 additional stores that we intended to sell, merge with a potential acquisition or close by December 31, 2005. As of December 31, 2005, we had merged 113 of the 114 stores identified to be merged with existing locations, sold 35 and merged one of the additional 48 stores on the plan.
      We estimated that we would incur restructuring expenses in the range of $12.1 million to $25.1 million, to be recorded in the third and fourth quarters of the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005, based on the closing date of the stores. During the year ended December 31, 2005, we recorded restructuring charges of $15.2 million. The following table presents the original range of estimated charges, the charges recorded in the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005, the estimated range of remaining charges to be recorded in the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006 and the remaining accrual as of December 31, 2005:
              
      Estimated
    Expense Recognized Remaining Charges
  Closing Plan Estimate During 2005 for 2006
       
  (In thousands)
Lease obligations $8,661 - $13,047  $9,261  $0 - $3,786 
Fixed asset disposals  2,630 -     4,211   3,333   0 -      878 
Net proceeds from stores sold     (2,250)   
Other costs(1)
  830 -     7,875   4,822   0 -   3,053 
          
 Total $12,121 - $25,133  $15,166  $0 - $7,717 
          
      The following table shows the changes in the accrual balance from September 30, 2005 to December 31, 2005, relating to our store consolidation plan.
                  
      Cash  
      (Payments)  
  September 30, 2005 Charges to Receipts or Asset December 31, 2005
  Balance Expense Write-Offs Balance
         
  (In thousands)
Lease obligations $5,341  $2,759  $(2,736) $5,364 
Fixed asset disposals     1,544   (1,544)   
Net proceeds from stores sold     (2,250)  2,250    
Other costs(1)
  658   86   (653)  91 
             
 Total $5,999  $2,139  $(2,683) $5,455 
             
(1)Goodwill impairment charges are the primary component of other costs. Additional costs include inventory disposals and the removal of signs and various assets from vacated locations.
     We expect the total estimated cash outlay in connection with the store closing plan to be between $9.0 million to $13.7 million. The total amount of cash used in the store closing plan during 2005 was approximately $4.0 million. Therefore, we expect to use approximately $5.0 million to $9.7 million of cash on hand for future payments primarily related to the satisfaction of lease obligations for closed stores.

30


Effects of Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma.
      During the last six months of 2005, we recorded pre-tax expenses of approximately $8.9 million related to the damage caused by Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma. These costs relate primarily to goodwill impairment of approximately $3.7 million and a combined loss of approximately $5.2 million for inventory and fixed assets written off.
Comparison of the Years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004
Store Revenue.  Total store revenue increaseddecreased by $29.8$17.1 million, or 1.3%0.6%, to $2,296.1$2,846.0 million for 2005in 2008 from $2,266.3$2,863.1 million for 2004.in 2007. The increasedecrease in total store revenue was primarily attributable to approximately $69.1 million315 fewer stores in incremental revenue from new stores and acquisitions, net of stores sold, during 2005 as comparedthe 2008 period, principally due to 2004,the 2007 store consolidation plan, offset by a decreasean increase in same store sales of 2.3%.
 
Same store revenues represent those revenues earned in 2,0432,201 stores that were operated by us for each of the entire years endingtwelve month periods ended December 31, 20052008 and 2004.2007. Same store revenues decreasedincreased by $39.3$43.5 million, or 2.3%, to $1,972.4 million in 20052008 as compared to 2004.$1,928.9 million in 2007. This decreaseincrease in same store revenues


29


was primarily attributable to a decreasean increase in the average number of customersprice per unit on a per store basis during 2005rent and an increase in merchandise sales and financial services revenue in 2008 as compared to 2004.2007.
 
Franchise Revenue.  Total franchise revenue decreased by $3.9$4.8 million, or 8.3%11.1%, to $38.2 million in 2008 as compared to $43.0 million for 2005 from $46.9 million in 2004.2007. This decrease was primarily attributable to a decreasethe receipt of accelerated royalty payments from five affiliated ColorTyme franchisees in merchandise sales to franchise locations as a result of 15 fewer franchised locations operating, on a weighted average basis, during 2005 as compared to 2004. The number of franchised locations operating in 2005 declined primarily as a resultconsideration of the purchasetermination of 54 franchised locations by otherRent-A-Center subsidiaries.their franchise agreements in 2007.
 
Cost of Rentals and Fees.  Cost of rentals and fees consists of depreciation of rental merchandise and the costs associated with our membership programs which began in 2004.programs. Cost of rentals and fees for the year ended December 31, 2005, increased2008 decreased by $2.6$1.1 million, or 0.6%0.2%, to $452.6$572.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 as compared to $450.0$574.0 million in 2004. This increase is a result2007. Cost of an increase in store rental revenue in 2005 compared to 2004. Depreciation of rental merchandiserentals and fees expressed as a percentage of store rentals and fees revenue increased slightly to 22.9% in 2008 compared to 22.1% in 2007. This percentage increase was constant at 21.7% for 2005 and 2004.due to an increase in promotional activity in 2008 as compared to 2007.
 
Cost of Merchandise Sold.  Cost of merchandise sold increased by $10.5$38.1 million, or 8.8%24.3%, to $129.6$194.6 million for 20052008 from $119.1$156.5 million in 2004. This increase was a result of an increase in the number of items sold in 2005 as compared to 2004.for 2007. The gross profitmargin percent of merchandise sales decreased slightly to 26.9% for 200524.2% in 2008 from 28.5%25.1% in 2004.2007. This percentage decrease was primarily attributable to an increased volume of sales of prepaid services at a decrease in the average purchase pricelower margin than our historical margins on merchandise sales, as well as increased promotional activity during 2005 as compared to 2004.the 2008 period.
 
Salaries and Other Expenses.  Salaries and other expenses increaseddecreased by $80.8$33.2 million, or 6.3%2.0%, to $1,358.7$1,651.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2005in 2008 as compared to $1,277.9$1,685.0 million in 2004.2007. The increasedecrease was primarily the result of an increasea decrease in salaries and wages and occupancy costs, higher fuel expenses relating to product deliveries and utility costs, as well asassociated with the impact of inventory and fixed assets written-offdecrease in our store base due to Hurricanes Katrina, Ritaour 2007 store consolidation plan and Wilma.other restructuring items. Charge offs in our rental stores due to customer stolen merchandise, expressed as a percentage of rental store revenues, were approximately 2.5% in 2008 as compared to 2.8% in 2007. Salaries and other expenses expressed as a percentage of total store revenue increaseddecreased slightly to 59.2% for the year ended December 31, 200558.0% in 2008 from 56.4%58.9% in 2004. This percentage increase was primarily attributable to the decrease in same store sales during 2005 as compared to 2004.2007.
 
Franchise Cost of Merchandise Sold.  Franchise cost of merchandise sold decreased by $3.2$1.0 million, or 8.0%3.1%, to $36.3$31.7 million for 2005 from $39.5 in 2004.2008 as compared to $32.7 million in 2007. This decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in merchandise salesthe number of products sold to franchise locations as a result of 15 fewer franchised locations operating, on a weighted average basis, during 2005franchisees in 2008 as compared to 2004. The number of franchised locations operating in 2005 declined primarily as a result of the purchase of 54 franchised locations by otherRent-A-Center subsidiaries.2007.
 
General and Administrative Expenses.  General and administrative expenses increased by $6.8$1.9 million, or 9.0%1.6%, to $82.3$125.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2005,in 2008 as compared to $75.5$123.7 million in 2004.2007. General and administrative expenses expressed as a percent of total revenue increased slightly to 3.5%4.4% in 20052008 from 3.3%4.3% in 2004. These increases are primarily attributable to additional personnel and related expansion at our

31


corporate office to support current and future growth, including our plans to expand into complimentary lines of business in ourrent-to-own stores.2007.
 
Amortization and Write-Down of Intangibles.  Amortization of intangibles increased by $925,000,approximately $900,000 or 8.6%5.7%, to $11.7$16.6 million for 20052008 from $10.8$15.7 million in 2004.for 2007. This increase was primarily attributable to the impairment charges recorded in connection with our store closing plan andgoodwill write-down for stores that closed due to Hurricane Katrinasold, offset by completed customer relationship amortization associated with previous acquisitions, suchintangible assets that were fully amortized during 2008 as the Rent Way, Rainbow and Rent-Rite acquisitions.compared to 2007.
 
Operating Profit.  Operating profit decreasedincreased by $33.2$70.2 million, or 11.7%34.3%, to $249.8$274.4 million for the year ended December 31, 20052008 as compared to $283.0$204.2 million in 2004.2007. Operating profit as a percentage of total revenue decreasedincreased to 10.7%9.5% for the year ended December 31, 20052008 from 12.2% in 2004. These decreases were7.0% for 2007. This increase was primarily attributable to the litigation charge of $62.3 million recorded in the 2007 period.
Interest Expense.  Interest expense decreased by $28.6 million, or 30.0%, to $66.2 million for 2008 as compared to $94.8 million in 2007. This decrease was attributable to a decrease in same store salesborrowings under our senior credit facilities in 2008 as compared to 2007, a reduction in amounts outstanding under our senior term loans and subordinated notes, and a decrease in our weighted average interest rate to 6.21% in 2008 as compared to 7.68% in 2007 due to a decrease in the increaseEurodollar rate in salaries and other expenses during 2005 versus 20042008 as discussed above.compared to 2007.
 
Income Tax Expense.  Income tax expense decreasedincreased by $22.2$41.7 million, or 23.2%104.2%, to $73.3$81.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2005in 2008 as compared to $95.5$40.0 million in 2004.2007. This decreaseincrease is primarily attributable to a decreasean increase in earnings before taxes for 20052008 as compared to 2004, in addition to a decrease2007 and an increase in our overall effective tax rate to 35.07%36.9% for 20052008 as compared to 38.00%34.4% for 2004.2007. The 2008 increase in our overall effective tax rate decrease was the result of the reversal of a $3.3 million state tax reserve in connection with a change in estimate related to potential loss exposures and a $2.0 million tax audit reserve associated with the examination and favorable resolution of our 1998 and 1999 federal tax returns.
Net Earnings. Net earnings decreased by $20.1 million, or 12.9%, to $135.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 as compared to $155.8 million in 2004. This decrease wasis primarily attributable to the decreasea 3.7% increase in same store sales,our state effective tax rate since we realized a greater benefit on our state income taxes in 2007 due to the impact of expensesthe charge related to our store consolidation plan and theas compared to 2008.


30


Net Earnings.  Net earnings increased by $63.3 million, or 83.1%, to $139.6 million for 2008 as compared to $76.3 million in 2007. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in salariesoperating profit, a gain on debt extinguishment and other expenses during 2005 versus 2004 as discussed above,a decrease in interest expense, offset by a pre-tax litigation reversionan increase in income tax expense in 2008 as compared to 2007.
Comparison of $8.0 millionthe Years ended December 31, 2007 and the tax credits discussed above.2006
Comparison of the Years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003
Store Revenue.  Total store revenue increased by $89.1$470.4 million, or 4.1%19.7%, to $2,266.3$2,863.1 million for 2004in 2007 from $2,177.2$2,392.7 million for 2003.in 2006. The increase in total store revenue was primarily attributable to approximately $155.8 million in incremental revenue from new stores and acquisitions, net of stores sold, during 2004 as compared to 2003, offset by a decreaseprimarily the Rent-Way acquisition, and an increase in same store sales of 3.6%2.1%.
 
Same store revenues represent those revenues earned in 1,9371,935 stores that were operated by us for each of the entire years endingtwelve month periods ended December 31, 20042007 and 2003.2006. Same store revenues decreasedincreased by $60.9$35.3 million, or 3.6%2.1%, to $1,729.6 million in 20042007 as compared to 2003.$1,694.3 million in 2006. This decreaseincrease in same store revenues was primarily attributable to a decreasemore units on rent in the average number of customers on a per store basis during 20042007 as compared to 2003.2006.
 
Franchise Revenue.  Total franchise revenue decreasedincreased by $4.0$1.8 million, or 7.9%4.3%, to $46.9 million for 2004 from $50.9$43.0 million in 2003.2007 as compared to $41.2 million in 2006. This decreaseincrease was primarily attributable to the receipt of accelerated royalty payments in the amount of approximately $3.9 million from five affiliated ColorTyme franchisees in consideration of the termination of their franchise agreements, offset by a decrease in merchandise salesthe number of products sold to franchise locations as a result of 16 fewer franchised locations operating by the end of 2004franchisees in 2007 as compared to 2003. The number of franchised locations operating in 2004 declined primarily as a result of2006 due to fewer new franchise stores together with the purchase of 27 franchised locations by otherRent-A-Center subsidiaries.in 2007.
 
Cost of Rentals and Fees.  Cost of rentals and fees consists of depreciation of rental merchandise and the costs associated with our membership programs which began in 2004. Depreciation of rental merchandise, which accounts for 99.2% of the costprograms. Cost of rentals and fees for the year ended December 31, 2004,2007 increased by $13.9$97.6 million, or 3.2%20.5%, to $446.6$574.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 as compared to $432.7$476.5 million in 2003.2006. This increase is a result of an increase in store rental revenue in 2004for 2007 as compared to 2003. Depreciation2006. Cost of rental merchandiserentals and fees expressed as a percentage of store rentals and fees revenue was constant at 21.6% for 2004 and 2003.increased slightly to 22.1% in 2007 compared to 21.9% in 2006.
 
Cost of Merchandise Sold.  Cost of merchandise sold increased by $6.8$25.1 million, or 6.1%19.1%, to $119.1$156.5 million for 20042007 from $112.3$131.4 million in 2003.for 2006. This increase was aprimarily the result of approximately $13.1 million of cost of sales for prepaid telephone service offered in our stores, as well as an increase in the number of items sold

32


in 2004 during 2007 as compared to 2003.2006. The gross profitmargin percent of merchandise sales increaseddecreased slightly to 28.5% for 200425.1% in 2007 from 26.6%25.3% in 2003. This percentage increase was primarily attributable to an increase in the average purchase price on merchandise sales during 2004 as compared to 2003.2006.
 
Salaries and Other Expenses.  Salaries and other expenses increased by $97.8$299.5 million, or 8.3%21.6%, to $1,277.9$1,685.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2004in 2007 as compared to $1,180.1$1,385.4 million in 2003.2006. The increase was primarily the result of an increase in salariesexpenses associated with the increase in our store base due to the acquisition of Rent-Way and wages andincludes increases in labor expense of $157.8 million, occupancy costs of $31.1 million, utility costs of $10.7 million, expenses relating to product deliveries of $25.2 million, communication expenses of $13.9 million and charge offs due to an increased numbercustomer stolen merchandise of $20.3 million. Charge offs in our rental stores due to customer stolen merchandise, expressed as a percentage of rental store revenues, were approximately 2.8% in the 2004 period. For the year ending December 31, 2004, there were 228 more stores, on a weighted average basis, operating during the year2007 as compared to 2003.2.4% in 2006. Salaries and other expenses expressed as a percentage of total store revenue increased slightly to 56.4% for the year ended December 31, 200458.9% in 2007 from 54.2%57.9% in 2003. This increase was primarily attributable to the decrease in same store sales coupled with an increase in salaries and other expenses of $104.5 million during 2004 compared to 2003 resulting from an increase in our store base, which was offset by a decrease of approximately $6.7 million in salaries and other expense incurred by our mature stores.2006.
 
Franchise Cost of Merchandise Sold.  Franchise cost of merchandise sold decreased by $3.7$2.1 million, or 8.7%6.1%, to $39.5$32.7 million for 2004 from $43.2 in 2003.2007 as compared to $34.9 million in 2006. This decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in merchandise salesthe number of products sold to franchise locations as a result of 16 fewer franchised locations operating by the end of 2004franchisees in 2007 as compared to 2003. The number of franchised locations operating in 2004 declined primarily as a result of2006 due to fewer new franchise stores together with the purchase of 27 franchised locations by otherRent-A-Center subsidiaries.in 2007.
 
General and Administrative Expenses.  General and administrative expenses increased by $8.9$30.1 million, or 13.3%32.2%, to $75.5$123.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2004,in 2007 as compared to $66.6$93.6 million in 2003.2006. General and administrative expenses expressed as a percent of total revenue increased to 3.3%4.3% in 20042007 from 3.0%3.8% in 2003.2006. These increases are primarily attributable to the operation of the Rainbow Rentalsadditional personnel and Rent Rite headquarters during the integration and transition period pursuant to those acquisitions,related expansion at our corporate office to support current and future store growth, as well as the impactincluding our plans to expand into complementary lines of the decreasebusiness in our same stores sales for 2004.rent-to-own stores.
 
Amortization and Write-Down of Intangibles.  Amortization of intangibles decreasedincreased by $1.7$10.2 million or 13.8%182.3%, to $10.8$15.7 million for 20042007 from $12.5$5.6 million in 2003.for 2006. This decreaseincrease was primarily attributable to the completed


31


amortization of certain intangibles particularlyfrom the $7.9 million in customer relationships associated with the 2003 acquisition of 295 stores from Rent-Way. The decrease dueRent-Way, which were included in amortization expense for the entire twelve months ended December 31, 2007, compared to the completion of amortization of certain intangibles was offset by the addition of customer relationship and non-compete amortization related to the Rainbow Rentals and Rent Rite acquisitionsapproximately 45 days in May 2004.2006.
 
Operating Profit.  Operating profit decreased by $87.0$17.7 million, or 23.5%8.0%, to $283.0$204.2 million for the year ended December 31, 20042007 as compared to $370.0$221.9 million in 2003. Excluding the pre-tax litigation charges of $47.0 million recorded in 2004, operating profit decreased $40.0 million, or 10.8%, to $330.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 as compared to $370.0 million in 2003.2006. Operating profit as a percentage of total revenue decreased to 14.3%7.0% for the year ended December 31, 2004 before the pre-tax litigation charge of $47.0 million,2007 from 16.6%9.1% for the year ended December 31, 2003. These decreases, excluding the pre-tax litigation charge, were2006. This decrease was primarily attributable to the decreasea $38.7 million charge related to our store consolidation plan and other restructuring items, offset by a net increase in same store sales during 2004 versus 2003revenues and incremental revenue from new stores and acquisitions, primarily the increase in salaries and other expensesRent-Way acquisition, as discussed above. For the year ended December 31, 2004, there were 228 more stores, on a weighted average basis, operating during the year
Interest Expense.  Interest expense increased by $36.2 million, or 61.9%, to $94.8 million for 2007 as compared to 2003, many of which are not yet performing at the level of a mature store.
Financing Costs. In 2004, we incurred $4.2$58.6 million in charges related2006. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in senior debt outstanding relating to the refinancing ofRent-Way acquisition for the full year in 2007 as compared to 45 days in 2006 and increased borrowings under our senior debtrevolving credit facility in July 2004. During 2003, we announced and commenced a program2007 as compared to recapitalize a portion of our financial structure in a series of transactions. Please see Note G in the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this report. In connection with the recapitalization in 2003, we recorded $35.3 million in financing charges. These charges primarily consisted of senior subordinated note premiums of approximately $18.7 million, senior subordinated note issue costs and loan origination fees written-off of approximately $11.9 million and other bank charges and fees of approximately $4.7 million.2006.

33


 
Income Tax Expense.  Income tax expense decreased by $13.8$21.0 million, or 12.6%34.4%, to $95.5$40.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2004in 2007 as compared to $109.3$61.0 million in 2003.2006. This decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease in earnings before taxes for 20042007 as compared to 2003, offset by2006 and a slight increasedecrease in our overall effective tax rate to 38.0%34.4% for 20042007 as compared to 37.6%37.1% for 2003.
Net Earnings. Including the litigation charge adjustments noted above, net earnings decreased by $25.6 million, or 14.1%, to $155.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 as compared to $181.5 million2006. The decrease in 2003. Excluding the afterour overall effective tax effects of the $47.0 million litigation charge, $4.2 million refinance charge and $7.9 million in other income from the sale of charged off accounts recorded in 2004, net earnings decreased by $20.5 million, or 10.1%, to $182.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 from $203.2 million before the after tax effects of the $35.3 million in recapitalization charges recorded in 2003. This decrease israte was primarily attributable to the operating profit decrease mentioned above, offsetimpact of the charge related to our store consolidation plan on our state income taxes.
Net Earnings.  Net earnings decreased by lower interest expense during 2004$26.8 million, or 26.0%, to $76.3 million for 2007 as compared to 2003.$103.1 million in 2006. This decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in operating profit and an increase in interest expense, offset by a decrease in income tax expense, as discussed above.
Quarterly Results
 
The following table contains certain unaudited historical financial information for the quarters indicated. All prices and amounts have been adjusted to reflect the 5-for-2 split of our common stock effected in August 2003.
                  
  1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter
         
  (In thousands, except per share data)
Year ended December 31, 2005
                
 Revenues $601,809  $580,578  $573,507  $583,213 
 Operating profit  85,992   72,988   30,980(2)  59,811 
 Net earnings  47,669(1)  41,742   11,277   35,050(3)
 Basic earnings per common share $0.64  $0.56  $0.15  $0.50 
 Diluted earnings per common share $0.63  $0.55  $0.15  $0.50 
Year ended December 31, 2004
                
 Revenues $585,380  $572,985  $569,607  $585,283 
 Operating profit  92,659   90,223   24,344(4)  75,725 
 Net earnings  52,209   51,194   5,573   46,879 
 Basic earnings per common share $0.65  $0.64  $0.07  $0.63 
 Diluted earnings per common share $0.63  $0.62  $0.07  $0.61 
Year ended December 31, 2003
                
 Revenues $566,406  $553,260  $549,825  $558,659 
 Operating profit  96,291   97,238   87,502   88,991 
 Net earnings  50,959   35,300   43,738   51,499 
 Basic earnings per common share $0.58  $0.40  $0.54  $0.64 
 Diluted earnings per common share $0.57  $0.39  $0.52  $0.62 
                 
  1st Quarter  2nd Quarter  3rd Quarter  4th Quarter 
  (In thousands, except per share data) 
 
Year ended December 31, 2008
                
Revenues $756,636  $719,031  $708,755  $699,750 
Operating profit  77,540   74,434   58,549   63,865 
Net earnings  36,358   37,741   29,379   36,146 
Basic earnings per common share $0.55  $0.57  $0.44  $0.54 
Diluted earnings per common share $0.54  $0.56  $0.44  $0.54 
Year ended December 31, 2007
                
Revenues $755,299  $724,158  $709,701  $716,963 
Operating profit  46,155   87,024   60,575   10,483 
Net earnings(loss)  15,103   41,251   25,275   (5,361)
Basic earnings(loss) per common share $0.21  $0.59  $0.37  $(0.08)
Diluted earnings(loss) per common share $0.21  $0.58  $0.37  $(0.08)
Year ended December 31, 2006
                
Revenues $606,975  $583,623  $587,184  $656,126 
Operating profit  75,484   75,193   51,871   19,396 
Net earnings(loss)  40,328   39,843   25,241   (2,320)
Basic earnings(loss) per common share $0.58  $0.57  $0.36  $(0.03)
Diluted earnings(loss) per common share $0.57  $0.56  $0.36  $(0.03)


32

34


                  
  1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter
         
  (As a percentage of revenues)
Year ended December 31, 2005
                
 Revenues  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%
 Operating profit  14.3   12.6   5.4(2)  10.3 
 Net earnings  7.9(1)  7.2   2.0   6.0(3)
Year ended December 31, 2004
                
 Revenues  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%
 Operating profit  15.8   15.7   4.3(4)  12.9 
 Net earnings  8.9   8.9   1.0   8.0 
Year ended December 31, 2003
                
 Revenues  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%
 Operating profit  17.0   17.6   15.9   15.9 
 Net earnings  9.0   6.4   8.0   9.2 
                 
  1st Quarter  2nd Quarter  3rd Quarter  4th Quarter 
  (As a percentage of revenues) 
 
Year ended December 31, 2008
                
Revenues  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%
Operating profit  10.2   10.4   8.3   9.1 
Net earnings  4.8   5.2   4.1   5.2 
Year ended December 31, 2007
                
Revenues  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%
Operating profit  6.1   12.0   8.5   1.5 
Net earnings(loss)  2.0   5.7   3.6   (0.7)
Year ended December 31, 2006
                
Revenues  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%
Operating profit  12.4   12.9   8.8   3.0 
Net earnings(loss)  6.6   6.8   4.3   (0.4)
 
(1)Includes the effects of a pre-tax legal reversion of $8.0 million associated with the settlement of a class action lawsuit in the state of California and a $2.0 million tax audit reserve credit associated with the examination and favorable resolution of our 1998 and 1999 federal tax returns.
(2)Includes the effects of a $13.0 million pre-tax restructuring expense as part of our store consolidation plan, $7.7 million in pre-tax expenses related to the damage caused by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
(3)Includes the effects of a $2.1 million pre-tax restructuring expense as part of our store consolidation plan, $1.1 million in pre-tax expenses related to the damage caused by Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma and a $3.3 million state tax reserve credit due to a change in estimate related to potential loss exposures.
(4)Includes the effects of a pre-tax legal settlement charge of $47.0 million associated with the settlement of a class action lawsuit in the state of California.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview.  For the year ended December 31, 2005,2008, we generated approximately $187.9$384.7 million in operating cash flow. In addition to funding operating expenses, we used approximately $60.2$61.9 million in cash for capital expenditures, approximately $38.3$15.7 million in acquisitions of existingrent-to-ownrent-to-own stores, $13.4 million for common stock repurchases and approximately $118.4$307.9 million for a reduction in stock repurchases.debt of $312.2 million. We ended the year with approximately $57.6$87.4 million in cash and cash equivalents.
 
Analysis of Cash Flow.Cash provided by operating activities decreasedincreased by $143.1$144.3 million to $187.9$384.7 million for 2008 from $240.4 million in 2005 from $331.0 million in 2004.2007. This decreaseincrease is attributable to a decreasean increase in net earnings changesand an increase in deferred income taxes resulting from the reversalas a result of the effect that the Job Creation and Workers AssistanceEconomic Stimulus Act of 2002 had on our cash flow2008 as discussed underDeferred Taxes below, and changes in accrued liabilities. The change in our accrued liabilities is primarily due to the litigation settlement accrual of $47.0 million recorded in the third quarter of 2004 and then paid in 2005.working capital.
 
Cash used in investing activities decreased by $136.5$46.1 million to $96.0$71.5 million for 2008 from $117.6 million in 2005 from $232.5 million in 2004.2007. This decrease is primarily attributable to the acquisitioncompletion of Rent Riteconstruction of our new corporate headquarters building in 2007 and Rainbow Rentalsa reduction in May 2004 as well as a decreaseacquisitions of businesses in property assets purchased during 20052008 as compared to 2004.2007.
 
Cash used in financing activities decreasedincreased by $90.6$205.4 million to $93.1$323.2 million for 2008 from $117.8 million used in 2005 from $183.7 million2007. This increase in 2004. This decrease2008 as compared to 2007 is primarily related to decreasepayments made to reduce our outstanding debt and subordinated notes, offset by the purchase in stock repurchases in 2005 as compared to 2004.2008 of fewer shares of common stock.
 
Liquidity Requirements.  Our primary liquidity requirements are for debt service, rental merchandise purchases, capital expenditures, litigation expenses, including settlements or judgments, and implementation of our growth strategies, including store expansion and investment in our financial services business. Our primary sources of liquidity have been cash provided by operations borrowings and sales of debt and equity securities.borrowings. In the future, to provide any additional funds necessary for the continued pursuit of our operating and growth strategies, we may incur from time to time additional shortshort-term or long-term bank indebtedness and may issue, in public or private transactions, equity and debt securities. The availability and attractiveness of any outside sources of financing will depend on a number

35


of factors, some of which relate to our financial condition and performance, and some of which are beyond our control, such as prevailing interest rates and general financing and economic conditions. The global financial markets have recently experienced adverse conditions and continued volatility in the capital markets may affect our ability to access additional sources of financing. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available, or if available, that it will be on terms we find acceptable.
 
We believe that the cash flow generated from operations, together with amounts available under our senior credit facilities, will be sufficient to fund our debt serviceliquidity requirements rental merchandise purchases, capital expenditures, and our store expansion programsas discussed above (including mandatory principal payments) during 2006.the next twelve months. Our revolving credit facilities, including our $10.0$20.0 million line of credit at Intrust Bank, provide us with revolving loans in an aggregate principal amount not exceeding $260.0$420.0 million, of which $110.5$287.8 million was available at March 8, 2006.February 20, 2009. At March 8, 2006,February 20, 2009, we had $91.0$140.5 million in cash. To the extent we have available cash that is not necessary to fund the items listed above, we intend to make additional payments to service our existing debt, and may repurchase additional shares of our common stock or repurchase

33


some of our outstanding subordinated notes, as well as make additional payments to service our existing debt.notes. While our operating cash flow has been strong and we expect this strength to continue, our liquidity could be negatively impacted if we do not remain as profitable as we expect.
 If
A change in control would result in an event of default under our senior credit facilities, which would allow our lenders to accelerate the indebtedness owed to them. In addition, if a change in control occurs, we may be required to offer to repurchase all of our outstanding subordinated notes at 101% of their principal amount, plus accrued interest to the date of repurchase. Our senior credit facility restrictsfacilities restrict our ability to repurchase the subordinated notes, including in the event of a change in control. In addition, a change in control would result in an event of default under our senior credit facilities, which would allow our lenders to accelerate the indebtedness owed to them. In the event a change in control occurs, we cannot be sure we would have enough funds to immediately pay our accelerated senior credit facility obligations and all of the subordinated notes, or that we would be able to obtain financing to do so on favorable terms, if at all.
 
Litigation.  In November 2005, we reached an agreementWe recorded a pre-tax expense of $11.0 million in principlethe fourth quarter of 2007 related to settle allthe settlement of theEric Shafer et al. v.Rent-A-Center, Inc. andVictor E. Johnson et al. v.Rent-A-Center, Inc. coordinated matters pending lawsuits and related matters in Washington brought by the plaintiffs’ counselstate court in Los Angeles, California. Due to fewer class members eligible to participate in theRose/ Madrigalmatters on an agreed state-wide class basis for $1.25 million. These matters alleged violations of various provisions of Washington state law regarding overtime, lunch and work breaks, failure to pay wages due to our Washington employees, and various labor related matters. In January 2006, the court inRose/ Madrigalpreliminarily approved the class settlement. The final approval hearing before the court is scheduled for April 21, 2006. To account for this prospective settlement than originally estimated, as well as our ownnegotiated reductions in settlement payments to certain plaintiffs, the maximum claim amount remaining to be paid was reduced by approximately $2.4 million during the fourth quarter of 2008. We also paid settlement costs and plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees we accrued anin the amount of approximately $4.4 million, and settlement payments in the aggregate amount of $1.3approximately $2.4 million asduring the fourth quarter of December 31, 2005.
      While we believe that the terms of this settlement are fair, there can be no assurance that the settlement, if completed, will be approved by the court in its present form.2008. We believe that the cash flow generated from operations will be sufficientexpect to fund the prospectivemaximum remaining settlement without adversely affecting our liquidity.payments of approximately $1.8 million during 2009.
 Additional settlements
In January 2009, we paid $9.4 million in accordance with the settlement with the California Attorney General.
In our history, we have defended class action lawsuits alleging various regulatory violations and have paid material amounts to settle such claims. We cannot assure you that we will not be the subject of similar lawsuits in the future. Significant settlement amounts or final judgments against us on our existing litigation could materially and adversely affect our liquidity. Please refer to Note MK of our consolidated financial statements included herein.
 
Deferred Taxes.  On March 9, 2002, President Bush signed into law the Job Creation and Worker AssistanceThe 2008 Stimulus Act of 2002, which providesprovided for accelerated tax depreciation deductions for qualifying assetsby allowing a bonus first-year depreciation deduction of 50% of the adjusted basis of qualified property placed in service between September 11, 2001 and September 10, 2004. Under these provisions, 30% of the basis of qualifying property is deductible in the year the property is placed in service, with the remaining 70% of the basis depreciated under the normal tax depreciation rules. For assets placed in service between May 6, 2003 and December 31, 2004, the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 increased the percent of the basis of qualifying property deductible in the year the property is placed in service from 30% to 50%.during 2008. Accordingly, our cash flow benefited in 2008 from the resultinghaving a lower cash tax obligationsobligation which, in those prior years.turn, provided additional cash flow from operations. We estimate that our 2008 operating cash flow on a net cumulative basis, from the accelerated depreciation deductions on rental merchandise increased by approximately $85.3$75.0 million through 2004. Theas a result of the 2008 Stimulus Act with the associated deferred tax liabilities aredeferral expected to begin to reverse over a three year period beginning in 2009. However, on February 17, 2009, President Obama signed into law the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the “2009 Recovery Act”) which beganextends the bonus depreciation provision of the 2008 Stimulus Act by continuing the bonus first-year depreciation deduction of 50% of the adjusted basis of qualified property placed in 2005. Approximately $67.0service during 2009. We estimate the cash tax benefit of the 2009 Recovery Act to be approximately $85.0 million, or 79%, reversedof which $55.0 million will offset the 2008 deferral that reverses in 2005.2009, and the remaining $30.0 million will increase our 2009 operating cash flow. We expectestimate that $15.2at December 31, 2009 the remaining tax deferral associated with the 2008 Stimulus Act and the 2009 Recovery Act will be approximately $105.0 million or 18%,of which approximately 78% will reverse in 20062010 and the remaining $3.1 millionremainder will reverse in 2007, which will result in additional cash taxesbetween 2011 and a corresponding decrease in our deferred tax liabilities discussed above.2012.

36


 
Rental Merchandise Purchases.  We purchased $655.6$730.0 million, $654.3$747.3 million and $612.3$759.2 million of rental merchandise during the years 2005, 20042008, 2007 and 2003,2006, respectively.
 
Capital Expenditures.  We make capital expenditures in order to maintain our existing operations as well as for new capital assets in new and acquired stores. We spent $60.2$61.9 million, $72.1$102.0 million (which included amounts spent with respect to our new corporate headquarters location and $56.0the conversion of the acquired Rent-Way stores to theRent-A-Center brand), and $84.4 million on capital expenditures in the years 2005, 20042008, 2007 and 2003,2006, respectively, and expect to spend approximately $82.0$60.0 million in 2006, which includes amounts we intend to spend with respect to expanding our financial services business and our new corporate headquarters facility as discussed below.2009.
 In December 2005, we acquired approximately 15 acres of land located in Plano, Texas, on which we intend to build a new corporate headquarters facility. The purchase price for the land was approximately $4.2 million. Building costs are expected to be in the range of $20.0-$25.0 million, and construction began in January 2006. Building costs will be paid on a percentage of completion basis throughout the construction period, and the building is expected to be completed by the end of 2006. We intend to finance this project from cash flow generated from operations. Our remaining lease obligation on our existing location is approximately $6.2 million. We anticipate subleasing some or all of the space at our current location to offset the remaining lease obligation. Additionally, we have adjusted the remaining life on the assets which will be abandoned upon our move to the new facility.
Acquisitions and New Store Openings.  During 2005,2008, we continued our strategy of increasing ourrent-to-own store base through opening new stores, as well as through opportunistic acquisitions. We spentused approximately $38.3$15.7 million in cash acquiring stores and accounts for the year ended December 31, 2005. It is our intention to increase the number of stores we operate by an average of approximately 5% per year over the next several years.
      During 2005, we acquired 44 stores, accounts from 39 additional locations, opened 67 new stores, and closed 226 stores. Of the closed stores, 170 were merged with existing store locations, 13 stores were closed due to Hurricane Katrina and 43 stores were sold. The acquired stores and accounts were the result of 38in 20 separate transactions for an aggregate price of approximately $38.3 million, of which $3.6 million will be paid at the conclusion of an escrow period.transactions.


34


The table below summarizes the store growth activity for the yearyears ended December 31, 2005, 20042008, 2007 and 2003.2006.
              
   2005   2004   2003 
       
Stores at beginning of period  2,875   2,648   2,407 
New store openings  67   94   101 
Acquired stores remaining open  44   191   160 
Closed stores            
 Merged with existing stores  170   48   20 
 Sold or closed with no surviving store  56   10    
             
Stores at end of period  2,760   2,875   2,648 
             
Acquired stores closed and accounts merged with existing stores  39   111   220 
Total approximate purchase price of acquisitions $38.3  million  $195.2  million(1) $126.1  million 
 
             
  
2008
  
2007
  
2006
 
 
Stores at beginning of period  3,081   3,406   2,760 
New store openings  26   27   40 
Acquired stores remaining open  5   14   646 
Closed stores(1)
            
Merged with existing stores  45   363   25 
Sold or closed with no surviving store  30   3   15 
             
Stores at end of period  3,037   3,081   3,406 
             
Acquired stores closed and accounts merged with existing stores  38   36   164 
Total purchase price of acquisitions  $15.7 million   $20.1 million   $657.4 million 
(1)The total purchase price includes non-cash considerationSubstantially all of approximately $23.8 millionthe merged, sold or closed stores in common stock issued and approximately $6.1 million2007 relate to our store consolidation plans discussed in fair value assignedmore detail in Note F, Restructuring, in the Notes to the stock options assumed in connection with the acquisition of Rent Rite, Inc.Consolidated Financial Statements on page 59.
 
The profitability of ourrent-to-own stores tends to grow at a slower rate approximately five years from the time we open or acquire them. As a result of the increasing maturity of our store base, in order for us to show improvements in our profitability, it is important for us to continueincrease revenue in our existing stores. We intend to openaccomplish such revenue growth by offering new products and services, such as our financial services products, in our existing rent-to-own stores, in new locations or acquire underperforming storesand by acquiring customer accounts on favorable terms. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in adding financial services products to our existing rent-to-own stores, or that such operations will be as profitable as we expect, or at all. We also cannot assure you that we will be able to acquire customer accounts on favorable terms, or open new storesat all, or that we will be able to maintain the revenue from any such acquired customer accounts at the rates we expect, or at all.

37


We cannot assure you the stores we do acquire or open will be profitable at the same levels as our current stores, or at all.
Senior Credit Facilities.  Our $600.0$1,322.5 million senior credit facilities consistfacility consists of a $350.0$197.5 million five-year term loan, with the loans thereunder being referred to by us as the “tranche A term loans,” a $725.0 million six-year term loan, with the loans thereunder being referred to by us as the “tranche B term loans,” and a $250.0$400.0 million five-year revolving credit facility. The tranche A term loans are payable in 19 consecutive quarterly installments equal to $2.5 million from December 31, 2006 through June 30, 2009, $5.0 million from September 30, 2009 through June 30, 2010 and $37.5 million from September 30, 2010 through June 30, 2011. The tranche B term loans are repayable in 23 consecutive quarterly installments equal to approximately $1.8 million from December 31, 2006 through June 30, 2011 and approximately $172.6 million from September 30, 2011 through June 30, 2012.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, we repurchased approximately $40.6 million in tranche B term loans for approximately $36.3 million, resulting in a gain on extinguishment of debt, net of costs, of approximately $4.3 million. We further reduced outstanding indebtedness on our senior term loans during 2008 by making approximately $84.0 million in optional prepayments.
The table below shows the scheduled maturity dates of our senior term loans outstanding at December 31, 2008.
     
Year Ending December 31,
 (In thousands) 
 
2009 $21,756 
2010  91,756 
2011  274,728 
2012  320,907 
     
  $709,147 
     


35


The full amount of the revolving credit facility may be used for the issuance of letters of credit, of which $107.5$132.2 million had been utilized as of March 8, 2006.February 20, 2009. As of March 8, 2006, $110.5February 20, 2009, $267.8 million was available under our revolving facility. The revolving credit facility expires in July 2009 and the term loan expires in 2010.2011.
 The table below shows the scheduled maturity dates of our senior term debt outstanding at December 31, 2005.
     
Year Ending December 31,  
  (In thousands)
2006 $3,500 
2007  3,500 
2008  3,500 
2009  168,000 
2010  166,250 
Thereafter   
    
  $344,750 
    
Borrowings under our senior credit facilities bear interest at varying rates equal to the Eurodollar rate plus 1.00%.75% to 2.00%1.75%, or the prime rate plus up to 1.00%.75%, at our election. Interest periods range from seven days (for borrowings under the revolving credit facility only) to one, two, three or six months, at our election. The weighted average Eurodollar rate on our outstanding debt was 4.49%1.59% at December 31, 2005. None of2008. The weighted average Eurodollar rate on our outstanding borrowingsdebt was 0.43% at December 31, 2005 utilized the prime rate option.February 20, 2009. The margins on the Eurodollar rate and on the prime rate, which are initially 1.75 and 0.75, respectively, may fluctuate dependent upon an increase or decrease in our consolidated leverage ratio as defined by a pricing grid included in ourthe credit agreement. For the year ended December 31, 2005, the average effective rate on outstanding borrowings under the senior credit facilities was 6.29%. We have not entered into any interest rate protection agreements with respect to term loans under the new senior credit facility.facilities. A commitment fee equal to 0.20%0.15% to 0.50% of the unused portion of the revolving credit facility is payable quarterly. Asquarterly, and fluctuates dependent upon an increase or decrease in our consolidated leverage ratio. The initial commitment fee is equal to 0.50% of March 8, 2006, the total amount outstandingunused portion of the revolving facility.
Our senior credit facilities are secured by a security interest in substantially all of our tangible and intangible assets, including intellectual property. Our senior credit facilities are also secured by a pledge of the capital stock of our wholly-owned U.S. subsidiaries (other than certain specified subsidiaries).
Our senior credit facilities contain, without limitation, covenants that generally limit our ability to:
• incur additional debt in excess of $150.0 million at any one time outstanding;
• repurchase our capital stock and 71/2% notes and pay cash dividends in the event the pro forma senior leverage ratio is greater than 2.50x;
• incur liens or other encumbrances;
• merge, consolidate or sell substantially all our property or business;
• sell assets, other than inventory, in the ordinary course of business;
• make investments or acquisitions unless we meet financial tests and other requirements;
• make capital expenditures; or
• enter into an unrelated line of business.
Our senior credit facilities require us to comply with several financial covenants, including a maximum consolidated leverage ratio of no greater than 3.25:1 on or after December 31, 2008 and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of no less than 1.35:1. The table below shows the required and actual ratios under our revolvingcredit facilities calculated as of December 31, 2008:
Required RatioActual Ratio
Maximum consolidated leverage ratioNo greater than3.25:12.43:1
Minimum fixed charge coverage ratioNo less than1.35:11.86:1
These financial covenants, as well as the related components of their computation, are defined in the amended and restated credit agreement governing our senior credit facility, which is included as an exhibit to this report. In accordance with the credit agreement, the maximum consolidated leverage ratio was calculated by dividing the consolidated funded debt outstanding at December 31, 2008 ($881.7 million) by consolidated EBITDA for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2008 ($363.2 million). For purposes of $32.0the covenant calculation, (i) “consolidated funded debt” is defined as outstanding indebtedness less cash in excess of $25 million, bearsand (ii) “consolidated EBITDA” is generally defined as consolidated net income (a) plus the sum of income taxes, interest atexpense, depreciation and amortization expense, extraordinary non-cash expenses or losses, and other non-cash charges, and (b) minus the Eurodollar Rate. The weighted average Eurodollar rate onsum of interest income, extraordinary income or gains, and other non-cash income.


36


Consolidated EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure that is presented not as a measure of operating results, but rather as a measure used to determine covenant compliance under our outstanding debt was 4.53% at March 8, 2006.senior credit facilities.
 
The minimum fixed charge coverage ratio was calculated pursuant to the credit agreement by dividing consolidated EBITDA for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2008, as adjusted for certain capital expenditures ($485.4 million), by consolidated fixed charges for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2008 ($261.6 million). For purposes of the covenant calculation, “consolidated fixed charges” is defined as the sum of interest expense, lease expense, and mandatory debt repayments.
Events of default under our senior credit facilities include customary events, such as a cross-acceleration provision in the event that we default on other debt. In addition, an event of default under the senior credit facility would occur if a change of control occurs. This is defined to include the case where a third party becomes the beneficial owner of 35% or more of our voting stock or certain changes inRent-A-Center’s Board of Directors occurs. An event of default would also occur if one or more judgments were entered against us of $30.0 million or more and such judgments were not satisfied or bonded pending appeal within 30 days after entry.
We utilize our revolving credit facility for the issuance of letters of credit, as well as to manage normal fluctuations in operational cash flow caused by the timing of cash receipts. In that regard, we may from time to time draw funds under the revolving credit facility for general corporate purposes. The funds drawn on individual occasions have varied in amounts of up to $50.0$98.0 million, with total amounts outstanding ranging from $10.0$2.0 million up to $88.0$108.0 million. The amounts drawn are generally outstanding for a short period of time and are generally paid down as cash is received from our operating activities.
 Our senior
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (“Lehman”) is one of the lenders participating in our revolving credit facilities are secured by a security interest in substantiallyfacility. Lehman’s commitment under the $400.0 million revolving credit facility is approximately $37.3 million, all of our tangible and intangible assets, including intellectual property. Our senior credit facilities are also secured by a pledgewhich is unfunded. On September 15, 2008, Lehman filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the capital stockFederal Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of our U.S. subsidiaries, and a portion of the capital stock of our international subsidiaries.
      Our senior credit facilities contain, without limitation, covenantsNew York. We cannot be certain that generally limit our ability to:
• incur additional debt (including subordinated debt) in excess of $50 million at any one time outstanding;
• repurchase our capital stock and 71/2% notes and pay cash dividends (subject to a restricted payments basket for which $113.1 million was available for use as of December 31, 2005);
• incur liens or other encumbrances;
• merge, consolidate or sell substantially all our property or business;

38


• sell assets, other than inventory in the ordinary course of business;
• make investments or acquisitions unless we meet financial tests and other requirements;
• make capital expenditures; or
• enter into an unrelated line of business.
      Our senior credit facilities requireLehman will participate in any requests by us to comply with several financial covenants, including a maximum consolidated leverage ratio, a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. The table below shows the required and actual ratiosfor funding under our revolving credit facilities calculated as at December 31, 2005:
Required RatioActual Ratio
Maximum consolidated leverage ratioNo greater than2.75:12.34:1
Minimum consolidated interest coverage ratioNo less than4.0:16.42:1
Minimum fixed charge coverage ratioNo less than1.50:11.84:1
      Events of default underfacility or whether another lender might assume Lehman’s commitment. We do not believe the Lehman bankruptcy will have a material adverse effect on our senior credit facilities include customary events, such as a cross-acceleration provision in the event that we default on other debt. In addition, an event of default under the senior credit facilities would occur if there is a change of control. This is defined to include the case where a third party becomes the beneficial owner of 35% or more of our voting stock or certain changes in our Board of Directors occurs. An event of default would also occur if one or more judgments were entered against us of $20.0 million or more and such judgments were not satisfied or bonded pending appeal within 30 days after entry.liquidity.
 
71/2% Senior Subordinated Notes.  On May 6, 2003, we issued $300.0 million in senior subordinated notes due 2010, bearing interest at 71/2%, pursuant to an indenture dated May 6, 2003, amongRent-A-Center, Inc., its subsidiary guarantors and The Bank of New York, as trustee. The proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase and redemption of our then outstanding 11% senior subordinated notes.
 
The 2003 indenture contains covenants that limit our ability to:
 • incur additional debt;
 
 • sell assets or our subsidiaries;
 
 • grant liens to third parties;
 
 • pay cash dividends or repurchase stock (subject to a restricted payments basket for which $116.6$165.2 million was available for use as of December 31, 2005)2008); and
 
 • engage in a merger or sell substantially all of our assets.
 
Events of default under the 2003 indenture include customary events, such as a cross-acceleration provision in the event that we default in the payment of other debt due at maturity or upon acceleration for default in an amount exceeding $50.0 million, as well as in the event a judgment is entered against us in excess of $50.0 million that is not discharged, bonded or insured.
 
The 71/2% notes may be redeemed on or after May 1, 2006, at our option, in whole or in part, at a premium declining from 103.75%. The premium for the period beginning May 1, 2008 through April 30, 2009 is 101.25%. The 71/2% notes may be redeemed on or after May 1, 2009, at our option, in whole or in part, at par. The 71/2% notes


37


also require that upon the occurrence of a change of control (as defined in the 2003 indenture), the holders of the notes have the right to require us to repurchase the notes at a price equal to 101% of the original aggregate principal amount, together with accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of repurchase. This would trigger an event of default under our new senior credit facilities. We are not required to maintain any financial ratios under the 2003 indenture.
 
Store Leases.  We lease space for substantially all of our stores and service center locations, as well as our corporate and regional offices, under operating leases expiring at various times through 2013.2016. Most of our store leases are five year leases and contain renewal options for additional periods ranging from three to five years at rental rates adjusted according toagreed-upon formulas.

39


 
ColorTyme Guarantee.  ColorTyme is a party to an agreement with Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc. (“Wells Fargo”), whichwho provides $50.0$35.0 million in aggregate financing to qualifying franchisees of ColorTyme generally of up to five times their average monthly revenues. Under the Wells Fargo agreement, upon an event of default by the franchisee under agreements governing this financing and upon the occurrence of certain other events, Wells Fargo can assign the loans and the collateral securing such loans to ColorTyme, with ColorTyme paying the outstanding debt to Wells Fargo and then succeeding to the rights of Wells Fargo under the debt agreements, including the right to foreclose on the collateral. The Wells Fargo agreement expires in October 2006. Although we believe we will be able to renew our existing agreement or find other financing arrangements, we cannot assure you that we will not need to fund the foregoing guarantee upon the expiration of the existing agreement.on September 30, 2010. An additional $20.0 million of financing is provided by Texas Capital Bank, National Association (“Texas Capital Bank”) under an agreement similar to the Wells Fargo financing.Rent-A-Center East, Inc., a subsidiary ofRent-A-Center,guarantees the obligations of ColorTyme under each of these agreements, not consideringexcluding the effects of any amounts that could be recovered under collateralization provisions, up to a maximum amount of $70.0$55.0 million, of which $30.3$24.5 million was outstanding as of December 31, 2005. Mark E. Speese,Rent-A-Center’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, is a passive investor in Texas Capital Bank, owning less than 1% of its outstanding equity.2008.
 Stock Split. On July 28, 2003, we announced that our Board of Directors had approved a 5 for 2 stock split of our common stock to be paid in the form of a stock dividend. Each common stockholder of record on August 15, 2003 received 1.5 additional shares of common stock for each share of common stock held on that date. No fractional shares were issued in connection with the stock dividend. Each stockholder who would otherwise have received a fractional share received an additional share of common stock. The distribution date for the stock dividend was August 29, 2003. The effect of the stock split has been recognized retroactively in all share data in the consolidated financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis, unless otherwise noted.
Contractual Cash Commitments.  The table below summarizes debt, lease and other minimum cash obligations outstanding as of December 31, 2005:2008:
                     
    Payments Due by Period
     
Contractual Cash Obligations Total 2006 2007-2008 2009-2010 Thereafter
           
  (In thousands)
Senior Credit Facilities (including current portion) $424,050(1) $7,800  $7,000  $409,250  $0 
71/2% Senior Subordinated Notes(2)
  401,250   22,500   45,000   333,750   0 
Operating Leases  466,435   149,976   220,515   93,234   2,710 
                
Total $1,291,735  $180,276  $272,515  $836,234  $2,710 
 
                     
  Payments Due by Period 
Contractual Cash Obligations
 Total  2009  2010-2011  2012-2013  Thereafter 
  (In thousands) 
 
Senior Debt (including current portion) $721,712(1) $34,321  $366,484  $320,907  $ 
71/2% Senior Subordinated Notes(2)
  250,730   16,903   233,827       
Operating Leases  493,201   172,947   227,500   86,864   5,890 
Capital Leases  9,520   5,039   4,179   302    
                     
Total(3)
 $1,475,163  $229,210  $831,990  $408,073  $5,890 
                     
(1)Includes amounts due under the Intrust line of credit. Amount referenced does not include the interest on our senior credit facilities.payments. Our senior credit facilities bear interest at varying rates equal to the Eurodollar rate plus 1.00%.75% to 2.00%.1.75% or the prime rate plus up to .75% at our election. The weighted average Eurodollar rate on our outstanding debt at December 31, 20052008 was 4.49%1.59%.
 
(2)Includes interest payments of $11.25$8.5 million on each of May 1 and November 1 of each year.
(3)As of December 31, 2008, we have $2.1 million in uncertain tax positions, net of federal benefit. Because of the uncertainty of the amounts to be ultimately paid as well as the timing of such payments, these liabilities are not reflected in the contractual obligations table.
 
Repurchases of Outstanding Securities.  On October 24, 2003, we announced that ourOur Board of Directors hadhas authorized a common stock repurchase program, permitting us to purchase, from time to time, in the open market and privately negotiated transactions, up to an aggregate of $100.0$500.0 million of ourRent-A-Center common stock. Over a period of time, our Board of Directors increased the authorization for stock repurchases under our new common stock repurchase program to $400.0 million. As of December 31, 2005,2008, we had purchased a total of 14,426,00019,412,750 shares of ourRent-A-Center common stock for an aggregate of $356.1$457.8 million under this common stock repurchase program, of which 1,816,100program. We repurchased 801,800 shares were repurchasedfor $10.3 million in the fourth quarter of 20052008. A total of 951,800 shares were repurchased for approximately $34.5 million.$13.4 million in 2008. Please see “Market“Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities” on page 2218 of this report.
 
Economic Conditions.  Although our performance has not suffered in previous economic downturns, we cannot assure you that demand for our products, particularly in higher price ranges, will not significantly decrease in


38

40


decrease in
the event of a prolonged recession. ReductionsFluctuations in our targeted customers’ monthly disposable income such as those we believe may have been caused by the nationwide increases in fuel and energy costs,or high levels of unemployment could adversely impact our results of operations.
 
2007 Store Consolidation Plan.Plan and Other Restructuring Items. We expect the total estimated cash outlay in connection with our store consolidation plan to be between $9.0 million to $13.7 million.  The total amount of cash used in the store consolidation plan during 2005and other restructuring items through December 31, 2008 was approximately $4.0 million. Therefore, we$16.9 million, which primarily related to lease terminations. We expect to use approximately $5.0 million to $9.7$7.4 million of cash on hand for future payments, which will primarily relatedrelate to the satisfaction of lease obligations for closedat the stores. We expect the lease obligations will be substantially settled in twelve to eighteen months, with total completion no later than the second quarter of 2013. Please see “Store Consolidation Plan”refer to Note F, Restructuring, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on page 59 of this report for more information on our 2007 store consolidation plan.
 
Seasonality.  Our revenue mix is moderately seasonal, with the first quarter of each fiscal year generally providing higher merchandise sales than any other quarter during a fiscal year, primarily related to federal income tax refunds. Generally, our customers will more frequently exercise their early purchase option on their existing rental purchase agreements or purchase pre-leased merchandise off the showroom floor during the first quarter of each fiscal year. We expect this trend to continue in future periods. Furthermore, we tend to experience slower growth in the number of rental purchase agreements on rent in the third quarter of each fiscal year when compared to other quarters throughout the year. As a result, we would expect revenues for the third quarter of each fiscal year to remain relatively flat with the prior quarter. We expect this trend to continue in future periods unless we add significantly to our store base during the third quarter of future fiscal years as a result of new store openings or opportunistic acquisitions.
Effect of New Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141R,Business Combinations(“SFAS 141R”), which establishes principles and requirements for the reporting entity in a business combination, including recognition and measurement in the financial statements of the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. This statement also establishes disclosure requirements to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS 141R is effective for us on a prospective basis for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or subsequent to the reporting period beginning January 1, 2009. The impact of adopting SFAS 141R will depend on the nature and terms of future acquisitions, if any.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157,Fair Market Measurements(“SFAS 157”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures required for fair value measurements. SFAS 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require fair value measurements but it does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective on a prospective basis for the reporting period beginning January 1, 2008. The impact of adopting SFAS 157 had no material effect on our consolidated statement of earnings, financial condition, statement of cash flows or earnings per share.
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the FASB or other standards setting bodies that we adopt as of the specified effective date. Unless otherwise discussed, we believe the impact of recently issued standards that are not yet effective are either not applicable to us at this time or will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
Item 7A.Effect of New Accounting PronouncementsQuantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
 In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) enacted SFAS 123R, which replaces SFAS 123, and supersedes APB 25. SFAS 123R requires the measurement of all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, using a fair-value-based method and the recording of such expense in our consolidated statement of earnings. The accounting provisions of SFAS 123R are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005.
      We are required to adopt SFAS 123R in the first quarter of 2006. The pro forma disclosures previously permitted under SFAS 123 will no longer be an alternative to financial statement recognition. See theStock-Based Compensationsection shown in Note A to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report for the pro forma net earnings and earnings per share amounts for 2005 and 2004 as if we had used a fair-value-based method under SFAS 123 to measure compensation expense for employee stock incentive awards. The actual effects of SFAS 123R will depend on numerous factors, including the amounts of share-based payments granted in the future, the method used to value future share-based payments to our employees and estimated forfeiture rates. We will be adopting SFAS 123R under the prospective method and estimate recognizing additional pre-tax compensation expense of approximately $0.04 and $0.03 per diluted share for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively, based on the number of options outstanding at December 31, 2005, and assuming that we continue to issue stock options under the Plan consistent with our current policy and procedures. The decrease in the estimated expense under SFAS 123R, as compared to the pro forma expense shown in the Stock-Based Compensation table in the notes to our consolidated financial statements, is primarily due to methods of calculation that are permitted under SFAS 123R versus the methods under SFAS 123.
      SFAS 123R also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation expense to be reported as a financing cash flow, whereas current accounting rules prescribe that the benefits be reported as an operating cash flow. This requirement will reduce net operating cash flows and increase net financing cash flows in periods after adoption. Total cash flow will remain unchanged from what would have been reported under prior accounting rules.

41


Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
 
As of December 31, 2005,2008, we had $300.0$225.4 million in subordinated notes outstanding at a fixed interest rate of 71/2%, $344.8$709.1 million in term loans and $75.0approximately $12.6 million in revolvingoutstanding on our Intrust line of credit outstanding at interest rates indexed to the Eurodollar rate and $4.3 million outstanding on our line of credit at interest rates discounted from prime. The fair value of the subordinated notes is estimated based on discounted cash flow analysis using interest rates currently offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality.rate. The fair value of the 71/2% subordinated notes, based on the closing price at December 31, 20052008, was $291.0$206.2 million. As of December 31, 2005, we have not entered into any interest rate swap agreements with respect to term loans under our senior credit facilities.Carrying value approximates fair value for all other indebtedness.


39


Market Risk
 
Market risk is the potential change in an instrument’s value caused by fluctuations in interest rates. Our primary market risk exposure is fluctuations in interest rates. Monitoring and managing this risk is a continual process carried out by the Board of Directors andour senior management. We manage our market risk based on an ongoing assessment of trends in interest rates and economic developments, giving consideration to possible effects on both total return and reported earnings. As a result of such assessment, we may enter into swap contracts or other interest rate protection agreements from time to time to mitigate this risk.
Interest Rate Risk
��    
We hold long-term debt with variable interest rates indexed to prime or Eurodollar raterates that exposes us to the risk of increased interest costs if interest rates rise. As of December 31, 2008, we have not entered into any interest rate swap agreements. The credit markets have recently experienced adverse conditions, including wide fluctuations in rates. Continuing volatility in the credit markets may increase the costs associated with our existing long-term debt. Based on our overall interest rate exposure at December 31, 2005,2008, a hypothetical 1.0% increase or decrease in interest rates would have the effect of causing a $4.3$7.2 million additional pre-tax charge or credit to our statement of earnings than would otherwise occur if interest rates remained unchanged.earnings.


40

42


Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
     
  Page
 
Rent-A-Center, Inc. and Subsidiaries
    
  4442 
  4644 
Consolidated Financial Statements    
45
46
  47 
  48 
49
50
  5149 


41

43


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Rent-A-Center, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets ofRent-A-Center, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 20052008 and 2004,2007, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005.2008. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
 
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position ofRent-A-Center, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 20052008 and 2004,2007, and the consolidated results of their operations and their consolidated cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005,2008, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
 
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness ofRent-A-Center, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Our report dated March 10, 2006, included on page 45 of this report expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment thatRent-A-Center, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, was effective2008, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and management’s assessment thereof.our report dated February 26, 2009, expressed an unqualified opinion.
/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 10, 2006February 26, 2009


42

44


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Rent-A-Center, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, thatRent-A-Center, Inc. and SubsidiariesSubsidiaries’ (the Company) maintained effective“Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005,2008, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
 
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment,assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
 
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established by COSO. Also, in our opinion, the CompanyRent-A-Center, Inc. and Subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005,2008, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework issued by COSO.
 
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the December 31, 2005 and 2004 consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005 of the Company2008, and our report dated March 10, 2006,February 26, 2009, expressed an unqualified opinion.opinion on those financial statements.
/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 10, 2006February 26, 2009


43

45


MANAGEMENT’S ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL

OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
 
Management of the Company, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined inRule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Company’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to management and ourthe Company’s board of directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
 
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. A system of internal control may become inadequate over time because of changes in conditions, or deterioration in the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
 
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20052008 using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) inInternal Control-Integrated FrameworkControl — Integrated Framework.. Based on this assessment, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2005,2008, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles based on such criteria.
 
Grant Thornton LLP, ourthe Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an audit report on our assessmentthe effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. This report appears on page 45.43.


44

46


RENT-A-CENTER,Rent-A-Center, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESInc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
                 
  Year Ended December 31,
   
  2005 2004 2003
       
  (In thousands, except per share data)
Revenues            
 Store            
  Rentals and fees $2,084,757  $2,071,866  $1,998,952 
  Merchandise sales  177,292   166,594   152,984 
  Installment sales  26,139   24,304   22,203 
  Other  7,903   3,568   3,083 
 Franchise            
  Merchandise sales  37,794   41,398   45,057 
  Royalty income and fees  5,222   5,525   5,871 
          
   2,339,107   2,313,255   2,228,150 
Operating expenses            
 Direct store expenses            
  Cost of rentals and fees  452,583   450,035   432,696 
  Cost of merchandise sold  129,624   119,098   112,283 
  Cost of installment sales  10,889   10,512   10,639 
  Salaries and other expenses  1,358,760   1,277,926   1,180,115 
 Franchise cost of merchandise sold  36,319   39,472   43,248 
          
   1,988,175   1,897,043   1,778,981 
 General and administrative expenses  82,290   75,481   66,635 
 Amortization of intangibles  11,705   10,780   12,512 
 Class action litigation settlement (reversion)  (8,000)  47,000    
 Restructuring charge  15,166       
          
    Total operating expenses  2,089,336   2,030,304   1,858,128 
          
   Operating profit  249,771   282,951   370,022 
Income from sale of charged off accounts     (7,924)   
Finance charges from refinancing     4,173   35,260 
Interest expense  46,195   40,960   48,577 
Interest income  (5,492)  (5,637)  (4,645)
          
   Earnings before income taxes  209,068   251,379   290,830 
Income tax expense  73,330   95,524   109,334 
          
   NET EARNINGS  135,738   155,855   181,496 
Preferred dividends         
          
Net earnings allocable to common stockholders $135,738  $155,855  $181,496 
          
Basic earnings per common share $1.86  $1.99  $2.16 
          
Diluted earnings per common share $1.83  $1.94  $2.08 
          
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (In thousands, except per share data) 
 
Revenues            
Store            
Rentals and fees $2,505,268  $2,594,061  $2,174,239 
Merchandise sales  256,731   208,989   175,954 
Installment sales  41,193   34,576   26,877 
Other  42,759   25,482   15,607 
Franchise            
Merchandise sales  33,283   34,229   36,377 
Royalty income and fees  4,938   8,784   4,854 
             
   2,884,172   2,906,121   2,433,908 
Operating expenses            
Direct store expenses            
Cost of rentals and fees  572,900   574,013   476,462 
Cost of merchandise sold  194,595   156,503   131,428 
Cost of installment sales  16,620   13,270   11,346 
Salaries and other expenses  1,651,805   1,684,965   1,385,437 
Franchise cost of merchandise sold  31,705   32,733   34,862 
             
   2,467,625   2,461,484   2,039,535 
General and administrative expenses  125,632   123,703   93,556 
Amortization and write-down of intangibles  16,637   15,734   5,573 
Litigation expense (credit)  (4,607)  62,250   73,300 
Restructuring charge  4,497   38,713    
             
Total operating expenses  2,609,784   2,701,884   2,211,964 
             
Operating profit  274,388   204,237   221,944 
Finance charges from refinancing        4,803 
Gain on extinguishment of debt  (4,335)      
Interest expense  66,241   94,778   58,559 
Interest income  (8,860)  (6,827)  (5,556)
             
Earnings before income taxes  221,342   116,286   164,138 
Income tax expense  81,718   40,018   61,046 
             
NET EARNINGS $139,624  $76,268  $103,092 
             
Basic earnings per common share $2.10  $1.11  $1.48 
             
Diluted earnings per common share $2.08  $1.10  $1.46 
             
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


45

47


RENT-A-CENTER,Rent-A-Center, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESInc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
          
  December 31,
   
  2005 2004
     
  (In thousands, except share
  data)
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents $57,627  $58,825 
Accounts receivable, net  20,403   16,269 
Prepaid expenses and other assets  38,524   65,050 
Rental merchandise, net        
 On rent  588,978   596,447 
 Held for rent  161,702   162,664 
Merchandise held for installment sale  2,200   1,311 
Property assets, net  149,904   144,818 
Goodwill, net  925,960   913,415 
Other intangible assets, net  3,366   8,989 
       
  $1,948,664  $1,967,788 
       
 
LIABILITIES
Accounts payable — trade $88,147  $94,399 
Accrued liabilities  191,831  ��207,835 
Deferred income taxes  121,204   163,031 
Senior debt  424,050   408,250 
Subordinated notes payable, net of discount  300,000   300,000 
Redeemable convertible voting preferred stock     2 
       
   1,125,232   1,173,517 
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES        
 
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 Common stock, $.01 par value; 250,000,000 shares authorized; 102,988,126 and 102,297,937 shares issued in 2005 and 2004, respectively  1,030   1,023 
 Additional paid-in capital  630,308   618,486 
 Retained earnings  901,493   765,785 
 Treasury stock, 33,801,099 and 27,900,399 shares at cost in 2005 and 2004, respectively  (709,399)  (591,023)
       
   823,432   794,271 
       
  $1,948,664  $1,967,788 
       
         
  December 31, 
  2008  2007 
  (In thousands, except share and par value data) 
 
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents $87,382  $97,375 
Receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $7,256 in 2008 and $4,945 in 2007  51,766   41,629 
Prepaid expenses and other assets  59,217   56,384 
Rental merchandise, net         
On rent  634,946   735,672 
Held for rent  184,108   202,298 
Merchandise held for installment sale  3,433   2,334 
Property assets, net  208,897   222,157 
Goodwill, net  1,265,249   1,255,163 
Other intangible assets, net  1,704   13,931 
         
  $2,496,702  $2,626,943 
         
 
LIABILITIES
Accounts payable — trade $93,496  $100,419 
Accrued liabilities  289,701   310,420 
Deferred income taxes  87,216   9,678 
Senior debt  721,712   959,335 
Subordinated notes payable  225,375   300,000 
         
   1,417,500   1,679,852 
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES        
 
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock, $.01 par value; 250,000,000 shares authorized; 104,769,382 and 104,540,127 shares issued in 2008 and 2007, respectively  1,047   1,045 
Additional paid-in capital  681,067   674,032 
Retained earnings  1,208,009   1,069,553 
Treasury stock, 38,787,849 and 37,836,049 shares at cost in 2008 and 2007, respectively  (810,921)  (797,539)
         
   1,079,202   947,091 
         
  $2,496,702  $2,626,943 
         
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


46

48


RENT-A-CENTER,Rent-A-Center, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Inc. and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

For the three years ended December 31, 2005
2008
(In thousands)
                                
          Accumulated  
  Common Stock Additional     Comprehensive  
    Paid-In Retained Treasury Income  
  Shares Amount Capital Earnings Stock (Loss) Total
               
Balance at January 1, 2003  98,845  $395  $532,675  $428,621  $(115,565) $(3,726) $842,400 
 Net earnings           181,496         181,496 
 Other comprehensive income:                            
  Gains on interest rate swaps, net of tax of $3,986                 6,504   6,504 
  Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net earnings, net of tax of $1,702                 (2,778)  (2,778)
                      
   Other comprehensive income                      3,726   3,726 
                      
   Comprehensive income                          185,222 
 Purchase of treasury stock (9,528 shares)              (273,175)     (273,175)
 Issuance of stock options for services        28            28 
 Effect of 5-for-2 stock split     605   (451)  (154)         
 Exercise of stock options  2,303   12   29,771            29,783 
 Tax benefits related to exercise of stock options        10,605            10,605 
 Other           (33)        (33)
                      
Balance at December 31, 2003  101,148   1,012   572,628   609,930   (388,740)     794,830 
                      
 Net earnings           155,855         155,855 
 Purchase of treasury stock (7,690 shares)              (210,520)     (210,520)
 Issuance of treasury shares for acquisition (815 shares)        15,617      8,237      23,854 
 Conversion of stock options for acquisition        6,123            6,123 
 Exercise of stock options  1,150   11   16,604            16,615 
 Tax benefits related to exercise of stock options        7,514            7,514 
                      
Balance at December 31, 2004  102,298   1,023   618,486   765,785   (591,023)     794,271 
                      
 Net earnings           135,738         135,738 
 Purchase of treasury stock (5,901 shares)        (146)     (118,376)     (118,522)
 Conversion of preferred stock to common        2            2 
 Exercise of stock options  690   7   9,512            9,519 
 Tax benefits related to exercise of stock options        2,469            2,469 
 Other        (15)  (30)        (45)
                      
Balance at December 31, 2005  102,988  $1,030  $630,308  $901,493  $(709,399) $  $823,432 
                      
                         
        Additional
          
  Common Stock  Paid-In
  Retained
  Treasury
    
  Shares  Amount  Capital  Earnings  Stock  Total 
 
Balance at January 1, 2006  102,988  $1,030  $630,308  $890,467  $(709,399) $812,406 
Net earnings           103,092      103,092 
Purchase of treasury stock (203 shares)        (5)     (4,691)  (4,696)
Exercise of stock options  1,204   12   20,091         20,103 
Tax benefits related to exercise of stock options        4,291         4,291 
Stock-based compensation        7,792         7,792 
Other        (37)  8      (29)
                         
Balance at December 31, 2006  104,192   1,042   662,440   993,567   (714,090)  942,959 
Net earnings           76,268      76,268 
Purchase of treasury stock (3,832 shares)        (99)     (83,449)  (83,548)
Exercise of stock options  348   3   5,928         5,931 
Tax benefits related to exercise of stock options        943         943 
Stock-based compensation        5,050         5,050 
Other        (230)  (282)     (512)
                         
Balance at December 31, 2007  104,540   1,045   674,032   1,069,553   (797,539)  947,091 
Net earnings           139,624      139,624 
Other comprehensive income:                        
Foreign currency translation adjustment           386      386 
                         
Comprehensive income                      140,010 
                         
Purchase of treasury stock (952 shares)        (24)     (13,382)  (13,406)
Exercise of stock options  229   2   3,167         3,169 
Tax benefits related to exercise of stock options        560         560 
Stock-based compensation        3,341         3,341 
Other        (9)  (1,554)     (1,563)
                         
Balance at December 31, 2008  104,769  $1,047  $681,067  $1,208,009  $(810,921) $1,079,202 
                         
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


47

49


RENT-A-CENTER,Rent-A-Center, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESInc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                
  Year Ended December 31,
   
  2005 2004 2003
       
  (In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities            
 Net earnings $135,738  $155,855  $181,496 
 Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities            
  Depreciation of rental merchandise  444,682   446,578   432,696 
  Depreciation of property assets  53,382   48,566   43,384 
  Amortization of intangibles  16,236   10,780   12,512 
  Amortization of financing fees  1,600   690   844 
  Deferred income taxes  (41,827)  30,113   46,776 
  Financing charges from recapitalization     4,173   23,329 
 Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions            
  Rental merchandise  (427,907)  (456,316)  (424,397)
  Accounts receivable  (4,134)  (1,320)  (9,027)
  Prepaid expenses and other assets  30,106   (12,286)  (8,752)
  Accounts payable — trade  (6,252)  21,691   18,647 
  Accrued liabilities and other  (13,727)  82,506   24,904 
          
   Net cash provided by operating activities  187,897   331,030   342,412 
          
Cash flows from investing activities            
 Purchase of property assets  (60,230)  (72,096)  (55,987)
 Proceeds from sale of property assets  2,513   4,824   809 
 Acquisitions of businesses  (38,321)  (165,219)  (126,119)
          
   Net cash used in investing activities  (96,038)  (232,491)  (181,297)
          
Cash flows from financing activities            
 Purchase of treasury stock  (118,376)  (210,520)  (273,175)
 Exercise of stock options  9,519   16,615   29,783 
 Issuance of subordinated notes        300,000 
 Payment of refinancing fees        (17,049)
 Proceeds from debt  257,285   442,940   400,000 
 Repurchase of senior subordinated notes, including premium        (290,956)
 Repayments of debt  (241,485)  (432,690)  (251,500)
          
   Net cash used in financing activities  (93,057)  (183,655)  (102,897)
          
   NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  (1,198)  (85,116)  58,218 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year  58,825   143,941   85,723 
          
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $57,627  $58,825  $143,941 
          
Supplemental cash flow information            
 Cash paid during the year for:            
   Interest $43,933  $38,789  $56,401 
   Income taxes $97,190  $75,712  $68,805 
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (In thousands) 
 
Cash flows from operating activities            
Net earnings $139,624  $76,268  $103,092 
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities            
Depreciation of rental merchandise  561,414   561,880   465,902 
Bad debt expense  14,455   10,828   6,981 
Stock-based compensation expense  3,341   5,050   7,792 
Depreciation of property assets  72,683   71,279   55,651 
Loss on sale or disposal of property assets  375   20,345    
Amortization of intangibles  12,589   15,734   5,573 
Amortization of financing fees  1,703   1,824   1,606 
Deferred income taxes  77,538   11,213   (7,121)
Financing charges from refinancing        4,803 
Gain on extinguishment of debt  (4,335)      
Restructuring charge  4,497   38,713    
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions            
Rental merchandise  (438,964)  (445,920)  (551,968)
Accounts receivable  (24,572)  (17,390)  (7,325)
Prepaid expenses and other assets  (7,056)  (6,194)  (12,853)
Tax benefit related to stock option exercises  (560)  (943)  (4,291)
Accounts payable — trade  (6,924)  (18,021)  30,293 
Accrued liabilities  (21,086)  (84,286)  89,225 
             
Net cash provided by operating activities  384,722   240,380   187,360 
             
Cash flows from investing activities            
Purchase of property assets  (61,931)  (101,961)  (84,409)
Proceeds from sale of property assets  6,144   4,500   1,375 
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired  (15,700)  (20,112)  (657,378)
             
Net cash used in investing activities  (71,487)  (117,573)  (740,412)
             
Cash flows from financing activities            
Purchase of treasury stock  (13,382)  (83,449)  (4,691)
Exercise of stock options  3,169   5,931   20,103 
Tax benefit related to stock option exercises  560   943   4,291 
Payments on capital leases  (5,662)  (7,258)  (1,162)
Proceeds from debt  213,050   785,555   1,378,243 
Repayments of debt  (446,338)  (819,498)  (809,015)
Repurchase of subordinated notes  (74,625)      
             
Net cash provided by (used) in financing activities  (323,228)  (117,776)  587,769 
             
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  (9,993)  5,031   34,717 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year  97,375   92,344   57,627 
             
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $87,382  $97,375  $92,344 
             
Supplemental cash flow information            
Cash paid during the year for:            
Interest $70,688  $89,372  $50,871 
Income taxes (excludes $34,656 of income taxes refunded in 2008) $20,954  $19,759  $57,873 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


48

50


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Note A — Summary of Accounting Policies and Nature of Operations
 
A summary of the significant accounting policies applied in the preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements follows:
Principles of Consolidation and Nature of Operations
Principles of Consolidation and Nature of Operations
 
These financial statements include the accounts ofRent-A-Center, Inc.(“Rent-A-Center”) and its direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”).subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Unless the context indicates otherwise, references to“Rent-A-Center” refer only toRent-A-Center, Inc., the parent, and references to “we,” “us” and “our” refer to the consolidated business operations ofRent-A-Center and all of its direct and indirect subsidiaries.
At December 31, 2005, the Company2008, we operated 2,7603,037 company-owned stores nationwide and in Canada and Puerto Rico, including 31 stores under the names “Get It Now” and Canada, including 21“Home Choice” and eight rent-to-own stores located in Wisconsin operated by a subsidiary, Get It Now, LLC,Canada under the name “Get It Now,“Rent-A-Centre. and seven stores in Canada operated by a subsidiary, Rent-A-Centre Canada, Ltd., under the name “Rent-A-Centre.” The Company’sRent-A-Center’s primary operating segment consists of rentingleasing household durable goods to customers on arent-to-own rent-to-own basis. Get It Now offersand Home Choice offer merchandise on an installment sales basisbasis.
We also offer an array of financial services in Wisconsin.certain of our existing rent-to-own stores under the names “RAC Financial Services” and “Cash AdvantEdge.” The financial services offered include, but are not limited to, short term secured and unsecured loans, debit cards, check cashing and money transfer services. As of December 31, 2008, we offered financial services in 351 of our existing rent-to-own stores in 18 states.
 
ColorTyme, Inc. (“ColorTyme”), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary ofRent-A-Center, is a nationwide franchisor of 296rent-to-own stores. At December 31, 2008, ColorTyme had 222 franchisedrent-to-own stores operating in 38 states at December 31, 2005. Theserent-to-own stores offer high quality durable products such as home electronics, appliances, computers, and furniture and accessories.34 states. ColorTyme’s primary source of revenuesrevenue is the sale of rental merchandise to its franchisees, who in turn offer the merchandise to the general public for rent or purchase under arent-to-own rent-to-own program. The balance of ColorTyme’s revenue is generated primarily from royalties based on franchisees’ monthly gross revenues.
Stock Split
Rental Merchandise
 On July 28, 2003,Rent-A-Center announced that its Board of Directors had approved a 5 for 2 stock split on its common stock to be paid in the form of a stock dividend. Each common stockholder of record on August 15, 2003 received 1.5 additional shares of common stock for each share of common stock held on that date. No fractional shares were issued in connection with the stock dividend. Each stockholder who would otherwise have received a fractional share received an additional share of common stock. The distribution date for the stock dividend was August 29, 2003. The effect of the stock split has been recognized retroactively in all share data in the consolidated financial statements unless otherwise noted.
Rental Merchandise
Rental merchandise is carried at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Depreciation for all merchandise is provided using the income forecasting method, which is intended to match as closely as practicable the recognition of depreciation expense with the consumption of the rental merchandise, and assumes no salvage value. The consumption of rental merchandise occurs during periods of rental and directly coincides with the receipt of rental revenue over the rental-purchase agreement period, generally 7seven to 3630 months. Under the income forecasting method, merchandise held for rent is not depreciated and merchandise on rent is depreciated in the proportion of rents received to total rents provided in the rental contract, which is an activity-based method similar to the units of production method. OnHowever, on computers that are 24 months old or older and which have become idle, depreciation is recognized using the straight-line method for a period of at least six months, generally not to exceed an aggregate depreciation period of 3630 months. The purpose is to better reflect the depreciable life of a computer in our stores and to encourage the sale of older computers.
 
Rental merchandise which is damaged and inoperable, or not returned by the customer after becoming delinquent on payments, is expensed when such impairment occurs. AnyWe maintain a reserve for these expected expenses. In addition, any minor repairs made to rental merchandise are expensed at the time of the repair.

51


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESCash Equivalents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Cash Equivalents
      For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash equivalents include all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less. We maintain cash and cash equivalents at several financial institutions, which at times may not be federally insured or may exceed federally insured limits. We have not experienced any losses in such accounts and believe we are not exposed to any significant credit risks on such accounts.


49


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Revenue
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Revenue
Merchandise is rented to customers pursuant to rental-purchaserental purchase agreements which provide for weekly, semi-monthly or monthly rental terms with non-refundable rental payments. Generally, the customer has the right to acquire title either through a purchase option or through payment of all required rentals. Rental revenue and fees are recognized over the rental term and merchandise sales revenue is recognized when the customer exercises itsthe purchase option and pays the cash price due. Cash received prior to the period in which it should be recognized is deferred and recognized according to the rental term. Revenue is accrued for uncollected amounts due based on historical collection experience. However, the total amount of the rental purchase agreement is not accrued because the customer can terminate the rental agreement at any time and the Companywe cannot enforce collection for non-payment of future rents. ColorTyme’s revenue
Revenue from the sale of rental merchandise in our retail installment stores is recognized upon shipmentwhen the installment note is signed, the customer has taken possession of the merchandise to the franchisee. Franchise fee revenueand collectability is recognized upon completion of substantially all services and satisfaction of all material conditions required under the terms of the franchise agreement. Because Get It Now makes retail sales on an installment credit basis, Get It Now’s revenue is recognized at the time of such retail sale, as is the cost of the merchandise sold, net of a provision for uncollectible accounts. reasonably assured.
The revenue from our financial services is recorded differently depending on the type of transaction. Fees collected on loans are recognized ratably over the term of the loan. For money orders, wire transfers, check cashing and other customer service type transactions, fee revenue is recognized at the time the service is performed.
Receivables and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The receivable associated with the sale of the transactions.
Receivables and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
merchandise at our Get It Now sells merchandise through installment sales transactions. The installment noteand Home Choice stores generally consists of the sales price of the merchandise purchased and any additional fees for services the customer has chosen, less the customer’s down payment. No interest is accrued and interest income is recognized each time a customer makes a payment, generally on a monthly basis. The Company’s
Our financial services business extends short term secured and unsecured loans. The loans are funded with the Company’sour cash from operations. The amount and length of the loansuch loans may vary depending on applicable state law. The Company has
We have established an allowance for doubtful accounts for Get It Now’sour installment notes and loan receivables associated with the Company’sour financial services business. The Company’sOur policy for determining the allowance is based on historical loss experience, generally, as well as the results of management’s review and analysis of the payment and collection of the installment notes and tradeloan receivables within the previous quarter. Management believes that the Company’syear. We believe our allowances are adequate to absorb any known or probable losses. The Company’sOur policy is to charge off installment notes that are 90 days or more past due and loan receivables that are 3060 days or more past due. Charge-offsCharge offs are applied as a reduction to the allowance for doubtful accounts and any recoveries of previously charged off balances are applied as an increase to the allowance for doubtful accounts.
 
The majority of ColorTyme’s accounts receivable relate to amounts due from franchisees. Credit is extended based on an evaluation of a customer’sfranchisee’s financial condition and collateral is generally not required. Accounts receivable are due within 30 days and are stated at amounts due from customersfranchisees net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. Accounts that are outstanding longer than the contractual payment terms are considered past due. ColorTyme determines its allowance by considering a number of factors, including the length of time trade accounts receivable are past due, ColorTyme’s previous loss history, the franchisee’s current ability to pay its obligation to ColorTyme, and the condition of the general economy and the industry as a whole. ColorTyme writes off accounts receivable that are 120 days or more past due and payments subsequently received on such receivables are credited to the allowance for doubtful accounts.

52


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESProperty Assets and Related Depreciation
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Property Assets and Related Depreciation
Furniture, equipment and vehicles are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets (generally five years) by the straight-line method. Our building is depreciated over approximately 40 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the useful life of the asset or the initial term of the applicable leases by the straight-line method, whichever is shorter. The Company incurs


50


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
We incur repair and maintenance expenses on itsour vehicles and equipment. These amounts are expensedrecognized when incurred, unless such repairs significantly extend the life of the asset, in which case the Company amortizeswe amortize the cost of the repairs for the remaining life of the asset utilizing the straight-line method.
Intangible Assets and Amortization
Intangible Assets and Amortization
 Goodwill is
We record goodwill when the cost in excess ofconsideration paid for an acquisition exceeds the fair value of the identifiable net tangible and identifiable intangible assets of acquired businesses.acquired. Goodwill is not subject to amortization but must be periodically evaluated at least annuallyfor impairment. Impairment occurs when the carrying value of goodwill is not recoverable from future cash flows. We perform an assessment of goodwill for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Intangible assets that have finite useful lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives.
      Under SFAS No. 142,at the Company is required to test all existing goodwill for impairment. Inreporting unit level annually as of December 31 of each year, or when events or circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred. Factors which could necessitate an interim impairment assessment include a sustained decline in our stock price, prolonged negative industry or economic trends and significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results. We assess recoverability using several methodologies, which include the present value of estimated future cash flows (income approach) and comparisons of multiples of enterprise values to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) (market approach). The analysis is based upon available information regarding expected future cash flows and discount rates. Discount rates are based upon our cost of capital. If the carrying value exceeds the discounted fair value, a second analysis is performed to measure the fair value of all assets and liabilities. If, based on the second analysis, it is determined that the fair value of the assets and liabilities is less than the carrying value, we use a discounted cash flow approachwould recognize impairment charges in an amount equal to test goodwill for impairment.the excess of the carrying value over fair value. There were no impairment charges recognized related to goodwill in 2005, 2004 or 20032008, 2007 and 2006.
Accounting for goodwill based on this test. However, in 2005, as a resultImpairment of our store consolidation plan and Hurricane Katrina, the Company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $4.5 million and $3.7 million, respectively.Long-Lived Assets
Accounting for Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
      The Company evaluatesWe evaluate all long-lived assets, including intangible assets, excluding goodwill, and rental merchandise, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Impairment is recognized when the carrying amounts of such assets cannot be recovered by the undiscounted net cash flows they will generate.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Foreign Currency Translation
 
The Companyfunctional currency of our foreign operations is not currently a party to any interest rate swap agreements. Under the Company’s previous credit facility, the Company entered into interest-rate swap agreements in order to manage its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates by decreasing the volatility of earnings and cash flows associated with changes inpredominantly the applicable rates. The interest-rate swaps were derivative instruments related to forecastedlocal currency. Assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency are translated into U.S. dollars at the current rate of exchange on the last day of the reporting period. Revenues and expenses are generally translated at a daily exchange rate and equity transactions and hedged future cash flows. The effective portionare translated using the actual rate on the day of any gains or losses were included in accumulated otherthe transaction.
Other Comprehensive Income
Other comprehensive income (loss) until earnings were affected by the variabilityis comprised exclusively of cash flows. Any ineffective portionour foreign currency translation adjustment. The currency translation adjustment was recognized into earnings. The cash flows of the interest-rate swaps offset cash flows attributable to fluctuations in the cash flows of the previous floating-rate senior credit facility. If it became probable a forecasted transaction would no longer occur, the interest-rate swaps were carried on the balance sheetapproximately $386,000 at fair value, and gains or losses that were deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) were recognized immediately into earnings.
      Changes in the fair value of the effective cash flow hedges were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The effective portion that had been deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) was reclassified to earnings when the hedged items impacted earnings.
      The interest-rate swaps were based on the same index as their respective underlying debt. The interest-rate swaps were effective in achieving offsetting cash flows attributable to the fluctuations in the cash flows of the hedged risk, and no amount was required to be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into earnings for hedge ineffectiveness during the year ended December 31, 2003. The interest-rate swap resulted in an increase of interest expense of $4.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. In May 2003, the Company extinguished the remaining interest rate swap in connection with its recapitalization2008.

53


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESIncome Taxes
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
program. The accumulated loss in other comprehensive income of approximately $3.7 million was recognized immediately into earnings and is included in the finance charge of $35.3 million on the statement of earnings for 2003.
Income Taxes
      The Company recordsWe record deferred taxes for temporary differences between the tax and financial reporting bases of assets and liabilities at the enacted tax rate expected to be in effect when taxes become payable. Income tax accounting requires management to make estimates and apply judgments to events that will be recognized in one period under rules that apply to financial reporting in a different period in our tax returns. In particular, judgment is required when estimating the value of future tax deductions, tax credits and net operating loss carryforwards (NOLs), as represented by deferred tax assets. When it is determined the recovery of all or a portion of a deferred tax asset is not likely, a valuation allowance is established. We include NOLs in the calculation of deferred tax assets. NOLs


51


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Earnings Per Common Share
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
are utilized to the extent allowable due to the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and relevant state statutes.
Sales Taxes
In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force IssueNo. 06-3,How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income Statement(“EITF 06-3”), we apply the net basis for sales taxes imposed on our goods and services in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings. We are required by the applicable governmental authorities to collect and remit sales taxes. Accordingly, such amounts are charged to the customer, collected and remitted directly to the appropriate jurisdictional entity.
Earnings Per Common Share
Basic earnings per common share are based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period presented. Diluted earnings per common share are based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, plus, if dilutive, the assumed exercise of stock options and the assumed conversion of convertible securities at the beginning of the year, or for the period outstanding during the year for current year issuances.
Advertising Costs
Advertising Costs
 
Costs incurred for producing and communicating advertising are expensed when incurred. Advertising expense was $67.1$82.5 million, $62.7$79.8 million, and $67.8$67.3 million in 2005, 20042008, 2007 and 2003,2006, respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-Based Compensation
 The Company maintains a
We maintain long-term incentive planplans for the benefit of certain employees, consultants and directors, which isare described more fully in Note N. The Company accountsL. We adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R,Share-Based Payment(“SFAS 123R”), on a modified prospective basis beginning January 1, 2006 for this plan understock-based compensation awards granted after that date and for unvested awards outstanding at that date. SFAS 123R requires that the measurement and recognition of share-based payment awards to our employees and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations. No stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected in net earnings, as all options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal todirectors be made at the quoted market price of the underlying common stockestimated fair value on the date of grant.
      The following table illustrates the effect on net earnings and earnings per share if the Company had appliedgrant date. Determining the fair value recognition provisionsof any share-based awards requires information about several variables including, but not limited to, expected stock volatility over the terms of the awards, expected dividend yields and the predicted employee exercise behavior. We base expected life on historical exercise and post-vesting employment-termination experience, and expected volatility on historical realized volatility trends. In addition, all stock-based compensation expense is recorded net of an estimated forfeiture rate. The forfeiture rate is based upon historical activity and is analyzed at least quarterly as actual forfeitures occur.
Under SFAS 123R, compensation costs are recognized net of estimated forfeitures over the award’s requisite service period on a straight line basis. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, in accordance with SFAS 123R, we recorded stock-based compensation expense, net of related taxes, of approximately $2.1 million, $3.3 million and $4.9 million, respectively, related to stock options and restricted stock units granted.
Cumulative Effect of New Accounting Principle
In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108,Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,Statements(“SAB 108”). SAB 108 was issued to stock-based employee compensation.provide consistency in quantifying financial misstatements.
              
  Year Ended December 31,
   
  2005 2004 2003
       
  (In thousands, except per share data)
Net earnings allocable to common stockholders            
As reported $135,738  $155,855  $181,496 
 Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax benefit  9,152   9,868   15,687 
          
Pro forma $126,586  $145,987  $165,809 
          
Basic earnings per common share            
 As reported $1.86  $1.99  $2.16 
 Pro forma $1.73  $1.87  $1.97 
Diluted earnings per common share            
 As reported $1.83  $1.94  $2.08 
 Pro forma $1.71  $1.82  $1.90 
The methods most commonly used in practice to accumulate and quantify misstatements are referred to as the “rollover” and “iron curtain” methods. The rollover method quantifies a misstatement based on the amount of the error originating in the current year income statement. This method can result in the accumulation of errors on the


52

54


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 For all periods prior to April 1, 2004, the fair value of these options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions: expected volatility of 55.0%, risk-free interest rates of 2.9% and 3.7% and expected lives of four years in 2004 and seven years in 2003, respectively, and no dividend yield. For options granted on or after April 1, 2004, the fair value of the options was estimated at the date of grant using the binomial method pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions: expected volatility of 46.1%, a risk-free interest rate of 3.6%, no dividend yield and an expected life of four years. Had the Company changed from using the Black-Scholes option pricing model to a binomial method pricing model effective January 1, 2003 rather than April 1, 2004, the impact would
balance sheet that may not have been significant.material to an individual income statement but may lead to misstatement of one or more balance sheet accounts. The iron curtain method quantifies a misstatement based on the amount of the error in the balance sheet at the end of the current year. This method can result in disregarding the effects of errors in the current year income statement that result from the correction of an error existing in previously issued financial statements. We previously used the rollover method for quantifying financial statement misstatements.
Use of Estimates
The method established by SAB 108 to quantify misstatements is the “dual approach,” which requires quantification of financial statement misstatements under both the rollover and iron curtain methods.
 
SAB 108 was effective for us for the year ended December 31, 2006. As allowed by SAB 108, the cumulative effect of the initial application of SAB 108 was reported in the opening amounts of the assets and liabilities as of January 1, 2006, with the offsetting balance to retained earnings. We recorded an increase in accounts receivable of $4.2 million, an increase in accrued liabilities of $31.0 million, a decrease in accumulated depreciation of $6.4 million, an increase in deferred tax assets of $7.6 million and a decrease in retained earnings of $12.8 million due to adopting the dual approach in recording deferred and accrued revenue. The error arose because we were unable to specifically identify the total amount of deferred and accrued revenue due to system limitations. Prior to 2006, we recorded an estimate of the net profit effect of our cash collection pattern. We previously used the rollover method and quantified misstatements based on the amount of the error in the current year income statement. We did not consider these misstatements material to any year. The deferred and accrued revenue amounts increased with the increase in number of stores.
In addition, we recorded as of January 1, 2006 a $1.0 million increase in prepaid expenses, a $1.9 million decrease in accrued liabilities, a decrease in deferred tax assets of $1.1 million and an increase in retained earnings of $1.8 million related to adopting the dual approach in recording property taxes. The error arose in the calculation of the property tax accrual. We did not consider these misstatements material to any year. The time period over which the property tax adjustment arose was approximately three years.
Use of Estimates
In preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, management iswe are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent losses and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. In applying accounting principles, the Companywe must often make individual estimates and assumptions regarding expected outcomes or uncertainties. The Company’sOur estimates, judgments and assumptions are continually evaluated based on available information and experience. Because of the use of estimates inherent in the financial reporting process, actual results could differ from those estimates. The Company believes thatWe believe self-insurance liabilities, litigation, and tax reserves and stock-based compensation are areas where the degree of judgment and complexity in determining amounts recorded in itsour consolidated financial statements make the accounting policies critical. Please see the Critical
New Accounting Policies Involving Critical Estimates, Uncertainties or Assessment in Our Financial Statements section on page 26 of this report.Pronouncements
Other Income
In December 2004,2007, the Company sold to certain qualified buyers its right to collect outstanding amounts due, as well as itsFASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141R,Business Combinations(“SFAS 141R”), which establishes principles and requirements for the reporting entity in a business combination, including recognition and measurement in the financial statements of the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the merchandise rented, pursuantacquiree. This statement also establishes disclosure requirements to delinquent rental purchase agreements that have been charged off inenable users of the ordinary coursefinancial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of business. The accounts ranged from approximately one to five years old. The Company sold such accounts for approximately $7.9 million and recorded such amount as other income in its consolidated statement of earnings.
New Accounting Pronouncements
      In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) enactedbusiness combination. SFAS 123R, which replaces SFAS 123, and supersedes APB 25. SFAS 123R requires the measurement of all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, using a fair-value-based method and the recording of such expense in our consolidated statement of earnings. The accounting provisions of SFAS 123R are141R is effective for fiscal yearsus on a prospective basis for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or subsequent to the reporting period beginning after June 15, 2005.
January 1, 2009. The Company is required to adoptimpact of adopting SFAS 123R in the first quarter of 2006. The pro forma disclosures previously permitted under SFAS 123 will no longer be an alternative to financial statement recognition. See theStock-Based Compensationsection shown above for the pro forma net earnings and earnings per share amounts for 2005 and 2004 as if the Company had used a fair-value-based method under SFAS 123 to measure compensation expense for employee stock incentive awards. The actual effects of SFAS 123R141R will depend on numerous factors, including the amountsnature and terms of share-based payments granted in the future the method used to value future share-based payments to the Company’s employees and estimated forfeiture rates. The Company will be adopting SFAS 123R under the prospective method and estimates recognizing additional pre-tax compensation expense of approximately $0.04 and $0.03 per diluted share, for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively, based on the number of options outstanding at December 31, 2005, and assumingacquisitions, if any.


53

55


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157,Fair Market Measurements(“SFAS 157”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures required for fair value measurements. SFAS 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require fair value measurements but it does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective on a prospective basis for the Company continuesreporting period beginning January 1, 2008. The impact of adopting SFAS 157 had no material effect on our consolidated statement of earnings, financial condition, statement of cash flows or earnings per share.
From time to issue stock options undertime, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the Plan consistent with its current policy and procedures. The decrease inFASB or other standards setting bodies that we adopt as of the estimated expense under SFAS 123R, as compared tospecified effective date. Unless otherwise discussed, we believe the pro forma expense shown in the Stock-Based Compensation table earlier, is primarily due to methodsimpact of calculationrecently issued standards that are permitted under SFAS 123R versus the methods under SFAS 123.not yet effective are either not applicable to us at this time or will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
 SFAS 123R also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation expense to be reported as a financing cash flow, whereas current accounting rules prescribe that the benefits be reported as an operating cash flow. This requirement will reduce net operating cash flows and increase net financing cash flows in periods after adoption. Total cash flow will remain unchanged from what would have been reported under prior accounting rules.
Note B —Receivables and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Note B — Receivables and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Receivables consist of the following:
          
  At December 31,
   
  2005 2004
     
  (In thousands)
Installment sales receivable $18,356  $16,919 
Financial service loans receivable  2,757    
Trade receivables  2,607   1,956 
       
 Total  23,720   18,875 
Less allowance for doubtful accounts  (3,317)  (2,606)
       
 Net receivables $20,403  $16,269 
       
 
         
  December 31, 
  2008  2007 
  (In thousands) 
 
Installment sales receivable $29,561  $24,677 
Financial services loans receivable  19,327   12,285 
Trade and notes receivables  10,134   9,612 
         
Total  59,022   46,574 
Less allowance for doubtful accounts  (7,256)  (4,945)
         
Net receivables $51,766  $41,629 
         
Changes in the Company’sour allowance for doubtful accounts are as follows:
              
  At December 31,
   
  2005 2004 2003
       
  (In thousands)
Beginning balance $2,606  $1,918  $1,420 
 Bad debt expense  1,581   1,101   753 
 Addition from acquisition  114       
 Accounts written off  (1,271)  (744)  (312)
 Recoveries  287   331   57 
          
Ending balance $3,317  $2,606  $1,918 
          
             
  December 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (In thousands) 
 
Beginning balance $4,945  $4,026  $3,317 
Bad debt expense  14,455   10,828   6,981 
Accounts written off  (17,843)  (20,496)  (9,321)
Recoveries  5,699   10,587   3,049 
             
Ending balance $7,256  $4,945  $4,026 
             


54

56


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Note C — Merchandise Inventory
Rental Merchandise
           
  December 31,
   
  2005 2004
     
  (In thousands)
On rent        
 Cost $984,301  $999,265 
 Less accumulated depreciation  395,323   402,818 
       
  Net book value, on rent $588,978  $596,447 
       
Held for rent        
 Cost $210,865  $208,339 
 Less accumulated depreciation  49,163   45,675 
       
  Net book value, held for rent $161,702  $162,664 
       
Reconciliation of Merchandise Inventory
             
  December 31,
   
  2005 2004 2003
       
  (In thousands)
Begining merchandise value $760,422  $682,367  $631,724 
Inventory additions through acquisitions  9,233   68,317   58,942 
Purchases  655,553   654,261   612,276 
Depreciation of rental merchandise  (444,682)  (446,578)  (432,696)
Cost of good sold  (140,513)  (129,610)  (122,922)
Skips and stolens  (56,341)  (54,797)  (50,216)
Other inventory deletions(1)
  (30,792)  (13,538)  (14,741)
          
Ending merchandise value $752,880  $760,422  $682,367 
          
Note C —Merchandise Inventory
Rental Merchandise
         
  December 31, 
  2008  2007 
  (In thousands) 
 
On rent        
Cost $1,165,084  $1,296,230 
Less accumulated depreciation  (530,138)  (560,558)
         
Net book value, on rent $634,946  $735,672 
         
Held for rent        
Cost $260,649  $276,321 
Less accumulated depreciation  (76,541)  (74,023)
         
Net book value, held for rent $184,108  $202,298 
         
Reconciliation of Merchandise Inventory
             
  December 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (In thousands) 
 
Beginning merchandise value $940,304  $1,058,587  $752,880 
Inventory additions through acquisitions  4,890   5,544   213,010 
Purchases  730,006   747,251   759,222 
Depreciation of rental merchandise  (561,414)  (561,880)  (465,902)
Cost of goods sold  (175,835)  (169,773)  (142,774)
Skips and stolens  (71,780)  (79,818)  (59,585)
Effects of adopting SAB 108(1)
        6,368 
Other inventory deletions(2)
  (43,684)  (59,607)  (4,632)
             
Ending merchandise value $822,487  $940,304  $1,058,587 
             
(1)Represents adjustment to accumulated depreciation due to adopting SAB 108 in recording deferred and accrued revenue.
(2)Other inventory deletions include loss/damage waiver claims and unrepairable and missing merchandise, as well as acquisition charge-offs. 2005 inventory deletions also include $4.5 million in write-offs associated with Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma, as well as $6.6 million associated with the sale of 35 stores pursuant to our store consolidation plan during the fourth quarter.write-offs.
Note D — Property Assets


55

         
  December 31,
   
  2005 2004
     
  (In thousands)
Furniture and equipment $149,998  $175,735 
Transportation equipment  13,713   21,984 
Building and leasehold improvements  145,133   147,418 
Land and land improvements  4,248    
Construction in progress  11,118   1,988 
       
   324,210   347,125 
Less accumulated depreciation  174,306   202,307 
       
  $149,904  $144,818 
       

57


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Note E — Intangible Assets and Acquisitions
 
Note D —Property Assets
         
  December 31, 
  2008  2007 
  (In thousands) 
 
Furniture and equipment $223,488  $208,492 
Transportation equipment  34,738   43,025 
Building and leasehold improvements  224,098   207,367 
Land and land improvements  5,193   5,193 
Construction in progress  10,178   4,019 
         
   497,695   468,096 
Less accumulated depreciation  (288,798)  (245,939)
         
  $208,897  $222,157 
         
Note E —Intangible Assets and Acquisitions
Intangibles consist of the following (in thousands):
                           
    December 31, 2005   December 31, 2004
         
  Avg. Gross   Avg. Gross  
  Life Carrying Accumulated Life Carrying Accumulated
  (years) Amount Amortization (years) Amount Amortization
             
Amortizable intangible assets Franchise network  10  $3,000  $2,850   10  $3,000  $2,550 
 Non-compete agreements  3   6,040   4,423   3   5,902   3,197 
 Customer relationships  1.5   32,934   31,335   1.5   30,644   24,810 
                   
  Total      41,974   38,608       39,546   30,557 
Intangible assets not subject to amortization                        
Goodwill      1,025,112   99,152       1,012,577   99,162 
                   
Total intangibles     $1,067,086  $137,760      $1,052,123  $129,719 
                   
      
Aggregate Amortization Expense    
 
Year ended December 31, 2005(1)
 $16,236 
 Year ended December 31, 2004 $10,780 
 Year ended December 31, 2003 $12,512 
                     
     December 31,
  December 31,
 
     2008  2007 
  Avg.
  Gross
     Gross
    
  Life
  Carrying
  Accumulated
  Carrying
  Accumulated
 
  (years)  Amount  Amortization  Amount  Amortization 
 
Amortizable intangible assets Non-compete agreements  3  $6,281  $5,957  $7,017  $5,845 
Customer relationships  2   62,110   60,950   61,073   49,748 
Other intangibles  3   3,264   3,044   3,264   1,830 
                     
Total      71,655   69,951   71,354   57,423 
Intangible assets not subject to amortization                    
Goodwill      1,364,401   99,152   1,354,315   99,152 
                     
Total intangibles     $1,436,056  $169,103  $1,425,669  $156,575 
                     
     
Aggregate Amortization Expense    
Year ended December 31, 2008 $12,589 
Year ended December 31, 2007 $15,734 
Year ended December 31, 2006 $5,573 


56


Supplemental information regarding intangible assets and amortization.RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Estimated amortization expense, assuming current intangible balances and no new acquisitions, for each of the years ending December 31, is as follows:
     
  Estimated
  Amortization Expense
   
  (In thousands)
2006 $3,167 
2007  191 
2008  8 
2009   
    
Total
 $3,366 
    
 
         
  Estimated
    
  Amortization Expense    
  (In thousands)    
 
2009 $1,322     
2010  348     
2011  34     
2012       
2013       
         
Total $1,704     
         
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 20052008 and 20042007 are as follows:
           
  2005 2004
     
  (In thousands)
Balance as of January 1, $913,415  $788,059 
 Additions from acquisitions  25,947   112,209 
 
Goodwill impairment(1)
  (8,198)   
 Post purchase price allocation adjustments  (5,204)  13,147 
       
  Balance as of December 31, $925,960  $913,415 
       
 
         
  2008  2007 
  (In thousands) 
 
Balance as of January 1, $1,255,163  $1,253,715 
Additions from acquisitions  9,692   13,310 
Write-down of goodwill related to stores sold  (4,048)   
Post purchase price allocation adjustments  4,442   (11,862)
         
Balance as of December 31, $1,265,249  $1,255,163 
         
The post purchase price allocation adjustments in 2005 of approximately $5.2 million are primarily attributable to the tax benefit associated with certain items recorded as goodwill that2008 were deductible for tax purposes. The post purchase price allocation adjustments in 2004 of approximately $13.1 million are primarily attributable to inventory charge-offs for unrentable or missing merchandise acquired and other items. The post purchase price allocation adjustments in acquisitions, reserves2007 were primarily attributable to the tax benefit associated with items recorded as goodwill that were deductible for tax purposes, offset by inventory charge-offs for unrentable or missing merchandise acquired in the acquisition of Rent-Way, Inc. (“Rent-Way”).


57

58


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Acquisitions
The following table provides information concerning the acquisitions made during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (Dollar amounts in thousands) 
 
Number of stores acquired remaining open  5   12   646 
Number of stores acquired that were merged with existing stores  38   36   164 
Number of transactions  20   19   37 
Total purchase price $15,700  $20,112  $657,378 
Amounts allocated to:            
Goodwill $9,692  $13,310  $331,286 
Non-compete agreements  2   10   369 
Customer relationships  1,091   1,210   26,433 
Other intangible assets        3,264 
Property and other assets  25   38   57,175 
Rental merchandise  4,890   5,544   213,010 
Deferred income taxes        106,022 
Liabilities assumed        (46,164)
Restructuring accruals        (34,017)
Rent-Way, Inc.  On November 15, 2006, we completed the acquisition of Rent-Way whereby Rent-Way became an indirect wholly owned subsidiary ofRent-A-Center. Rent-Way operated 782 stores in 34 states. The total purchase price of approximately $622.5 million included cash payments and borrowings under our senior credit facilities and direct transaction costs of approximately $7.4 million. We funded the acquisition with a $600.3 million increase in our senior credit facilities. The operating results of Rent-Way have been included in the consolidated financial statements since the acquisition date of November 15, 2006.
Restructuring charges were included in the purchase price allocation, which were for employment termination costs in connection with closing Rent-Way’s corporate headquarters and for reserves put into place for lease buyouts for acquired stores which were closed post acquisition in compliance with executive management’s pre-acquisition plans, andplans. We expect the severance pay for the employees involved in the planned reduction in workforce inherited from some of the acquired companies.
(1)Goodwill impairment of approximately $4.5 million was included in our restructuring charges relating to our store consolidation plan and $3.7 million relating to Hurricane Katrina was included in amortization expense.
Acquisitions
      The following table provides information concerning the acquisitions made during the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003:
              
  Year Ended December 31,
   
  2005 2004 2003
       
  (Dollar amounts in thousands)
Number of stores acquired remaining open  44   191   160 
Number of stores acquired that were merged with existing stores  39   111   220 
Number of transactions  38   48   39 
Total purchase price $38,321  $195,196(1) $126,119 
Amounts allocated to:            
 Goodwill $25,947  $112,209  $48,445 
 Non-compete agreements  33   389   4,515 
 Customer relationships  2,282   9,991   9,938 
 Property assets  751   4,203   4,166 
 Rental merchandise  9,233   68,317   58,942 
 Other assets  75   87   113 
(1)The total purchase price includes non-cash consideration of approximately $23.8 million in common stock issued and approximately $6.1 million in fair value assigned to the stock options assumed in connection with the acquisition of Rent Rite, Inc.
Rent-Way, Inc. On February 8, 2003, the Companytermination costs will be completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of 295 rent-to-own stores from Rent-Way, Inc. for an aggregate purchase price of $100.4 million in cash. Of the aggregate purchase price, the Company held back $10.0 million to pay for various indemnified liabilities and expenses, if any, of which $5.0 million was remitted inby the second quarter of 2003 and $5.0 million was remitted in August 2004. The Company funded the acquisition entirely from cash on hand. Of the 295 stores, 176 were subsequently merged with the Company’s existing store locations. The asset values are based upon the fair value assigned to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired which are based upon the present value of future cash flows, historic longevity of like-kind customer base, historic profitability of like-kind customer base2010 and the numberreserves for lease buyouts will be completed no later than the second quarter of customer relationships acquired.2012. The excess of purchase consideration overfollowing table shows the fair value of tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets acquired was assigned to goodwill. The final purchase price allocation resulted in a $4.0 million decreasechanges in the value assignedaccrual balance from December 31, 2006 to customer relationships and a $4.0 million increase in the value placed on the non-compete agreement as comparedDecember 31, 2008, relating to the Company’s original estimates as disclosed in its 2002 Annual Report onthis restructuring (in thousands):
     
Balance at December 31, 2006 $34,017 
Adjustment to accrual  (1,863)
Cash activity  (23,937)
     
Balance at December 31, 2007  8,217 
Adjustment to accrual  286 
Cash activity(1)
  (6,673)
     
Balance at December 31, 2008 $1,830 
     
(1)Primarily related to lease terminations.


58

59


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Form 10-K. The table below summarizes the allocation of the
Acquisition purchase price based on the fair values of the assets acquired:
     
  Fair Values
��  
  (In thousands)
Inventory $50,100 
Property assets  4,300 
Customer relationships  7,900 
Non-compete agreement  4,300 
Goodwill  33,800 
    
Total assets acquired $100,400 
    
Rent Rite, Inc. On May 7, 2004, the Company completed the acquisition of Rent Rite, Inc. d/b/a Rent Rite Rental Purchase for an aggregate purchase price of $59.9 million. Rent Rite operated 90 stores in 11 states, of which 26 stores were merged with the Company’s existing store locations. Approximately 40% of the consideration was paid with 815,592 shares of the Company’s common stock, with the remaining portion consisting of cash, the assumption of Rent Rite’s stock options and retirement of Rent Rite’s outstanding debt. The common stock paid as well as the assumption of stock options were recorded at the fair value determined at the effective date of the purchase. The table below summarizes the allocation of the purchase price based on the fair values of the significant assets acquired:
     
  Fair Values
   
  (In thousands)
Rental merchandise $18,644 
Property assets  1,262 
Customer relationships  3,180 
Non-compete agreements  242 
Goodwill  36,568 
    
Total assets acquired $59,896 
    
Rainbow Rentals, Inc. On May 14, 2004, the Company completed the acquisition of Rainbow Rentals, Inc. for an aggregate purchase price of $109.0 million. Rainbow Rentals operated 124 stores in 15 states, of which 29 stores were merged with the Company’s existing store locations. The Company funded the acquisition entirely with cash on hand. The table below summarizes the allocation of the purchase price based on the fair values of the significant assets acquired:
     
  Fair Values
   
  (In thousands)
Rental merchandise $41,337 
Property assets  2,864 
Customer relationships  4,553 
Non-compete agreements  100 
Goodwill  60,192 
    
Total assets acquired $109,046 
    
      The Company entered into these transactions seeing them as opportunistic acquisitions that would allow the Company to expand its store base in conjunction with its strategic growth plans. The prices of the acquisitions wereare determined by evaluating the average monthly rental income of the acquired stores and applying a multiple to the total. CustomerAcquired customer relationships acquired in these transactions are being amortized

60


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
utilizing the straight-line method over an 18a 24 month period. Theperiod, non-compete agreements in these transactions are being amortized using the straight-line method over the life of the agreements, other intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over the life of the asset and, in accordance with SFAS 142, the goodwill associated with acquisitions is not amortized. The weighted average amortization period was 2.0 years for intangible assets acquired during the acquisitions will not be amortized.year ended December 31, 2008.
 
All acquisitions have been accounted for as purchases, and the operating results of the acquired stores and accounts have been included in the financial statements since their date of acquisition.
Note F —Restructuring
2007 Store Consolidation Plan
and Other Restructuring Items.  On September 6, 2005, the CompanyDecember 3, 2007, we announced itsour plan to close up to 162 stores by December 31, 2005.approximately 280 stores. The decision to close these stores was based on management’sour analysis and evaluation of the marketsevery market in which the Company operates, including its market share,we operated based on operating results, competitive positioning, and growth potential for the affected stores. The 162 stores included 114potential. As a result, we identified 283 stores that the companywe intended to close and merge with its existing stores and up to 48 additional stores that it intended to sell, merge with a potential acquisition or close by December 31, 2005.merge. As of December 31, 2005, the Company had2008, we closed or merged 113 of the 114 stores identified282 stores. We intend to be merged with existing locations, sold 35 and mergedkeep open one of the additional 48 stores on the plan.remaining store.
 The Company
We estimated that itwe would incur restructuring expenses related to the store consolidation plan and other restructuring items in the range of $12.1$36.0 million to $25.1$43.0 million, tosubstantially all of which would be recorded in the third and fourth quartersquarter of the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005,2007, based on the closing date of the stores. DuringWe recorded restructuring expenses in the yearamount of $4.5 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2005,2008 and $38.7 million in the Company recorded restructuring chargesfourth quarter of $15.2 million.2007. The following table presents the original range of estimated charges the charges recorded in the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005, the estimated range of remaining charges to be recorded in the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006 and the remaining accrual as of December 31, 2005:2007 and the total store consolidation plan charges and other restructuring items recorded through December 31, 2008.
              
    Expense Recognized Estimated Remaining
  Closing Plan Estimate During 2005 Charges for 2006
       
  (In thousands)
Lease obligations  $ 8,661 - $13,047  $9,261  $0 - $3,786 
Fixed asset disposals  2,630 -     4,211   3,333   0 -      878 
Net proceeds from stores sold     (2,250)   
Other costs(1)
  830 -     7,875     4,822   0 -   3,053 
          
 Total  $12,121 - $25,133  $15,166  $0 - $7,717 
          
 
             
        Estimated Remaining
 
  Closing Plan Estimate
     Charges
 
  As of December 31,
  Expenses Recognized
  As of December 31,
 
  2007  Through 2008  2008 
  (In thousands) 
 
Lease obligations $26,061 - $29,223  $25,680  $381 - $3,543 
Fixed asset disposals  11,006 -  11,516   11,476   0 -     40 
Other costs  2,468 -   6,704   6,054   0 -    650 
             
Total $39,535 - $47,443  $43,210  $381 - $4,233 
             
The following table shows the changes in the accrual balance from September 30, 2005December 31, 2007 to December 31, 2005,2008 relating to ourthe store consolidation plan.
                  
      Cash (Payments)  
  September 30, Charges to Receipts or Asset December 31,
  2005 Balance Expense Write-Offs 2005 Balance
         
  (In thousands)
Lease obligations $5,341  $2,759  $(2,736) $5,364 
Fixed asset disposals     1,544   (1,544)   
Net proceeds from stores sold     (2,250)  2,250     
Other costs(1)
  658   86   (653)  91 
             
 Total $5,999  $2,139  $(2,683) $5,455 
             
 
                 
  Balance at
     Cash (Payments)
  Balance at
 
  December 31,
  Charges to
  Receipts or
  December 31,
 
  2007  Expense  Asset Write-Offs  2008 
  (In thousands) 
 
Lease obligations $23,152  $441  $(16,236) $7,357 
Fixed asset disposals     470   (470)   
Other costs     3,586   (3,586)   
                 
Total $23,152  $4,497  $(20,292) $7,357 
                 
(1)Goodwill impairment charges are the primary component of other costs. Additional costs include inventory disposals and the removal of signs and various assets from vacated locations.
The Company expects the total estimated cash outlay in connection with the store consolidation plan to be between $9.0 million to $13.7 million. The total amount of cash used in the store consolidation plan duringthrough December 31, 2008 was approximately $16.9 million. We expect to use approximately $7.4 million of cash on hand for future payments, which will primarily relate to the satisfaction of lease obligations at the stores. We expect the lease obligations will be substantially settled in twelve to eighteen months, with total completion no later than the second quarter of 2013.


59

61


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
2005 was approximately $4.0 million. Therefore, the Company expects to use approximately $5.0 million to $9.7 million of cash on hand for future payments primarily related to the satisfaction of lease obligations for closed stores.
Note G —Senior Debt
Note G — Recapitalization
Recapitalization. In April 2003, the Company announced and commenced a program to recapitalize a portion of its financial structure in a series of transactions. The recapitalization consisted of the tender offer for all ofRent-A-Center East’s $272.25 million principal amount of senior subordinated notes, paying 11% interest, due 2008 (the “11% Notes”), the redemption of the 11% Notes, the issuance of $300.0 million principal amount of senior subordinated notes, paying 71/2% interest, due 2010 (the “71/2% Notes”), the refinancing of its senior debt and the repurchase of shares of its common stock.
      On May 6, 2003, the Company repurchased approximately $183.0 million principal amount of 11% Notes pursuant to a debt tender offer announced on April 23, 2003. On August 15, 2003, the Company redeemed all of the remaining outstanding 11% Notes in accordance with the terms of the indenture governing the 11% Notes, at the applicable redemption price of 105.5% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to that date. The total aggregate redemption price for the 11% Notes was approximately $93.75 million, including $4.65 million in accrued interest and $4.65 million in redemption premium. Proceeds from the offering of $300 million in 71/2% Notes were used to pay for the redemption.
      On April 25, 2003,Rent-A-Center announced that it entered into an agreement with affiliates of Apollo Management (together “Apollo”) which provided for the repurchase of a number of shares ofRent-A-Center’s common stock sufficient to reduce Apollo’s aggregate record ownership to 19.00% after consummation ofRent-A-Center’s planned tender offer at the price per share paid in the tender offer. On April 28, 2003,Rent-A-Center commenced a tender offer to purchase up to 2.2 million shares ofRent-A-Center’s common stock (on a pre-split basis) pursuant to a modified “Dutch Auction.” On June 25, 2003,Rent-A-Center closed the tender offer and purchased 1,769,960 shares ofRent-A-Center’s common stock (on a pre-split basis) at $73 per share (on a pre-split basis) for approximately $129.2 million. On July 11, 2003,Rent-A-Center closed the Apollo transaction and purchased 774,547 shares ofRent-A-Center’s common stock (on a pre-split basis) at $73 per share (on a pre-split basis) for approximately $56.5 million. As contemplated by the Apollo agreement, Apollo also exchanged their shares of Series A preferred stock for shares of Series C preferred stock. As a result, no shares of Series A preferred stock remain outstanding. The terms of the Series A preferred stock and Series C preferred stock were substantially similar, except the Series C preferred stock did not have the right to directly elect any members ofRent-A-Center’s Board of Directors. As of December 31, 2005, no shares of Series C preferred stock remained outstanding.
      On May 6, 2003,Rent-A-Center issued $300.0 million in 71/2% Notes, the proceeds of which were used, in part, to fund the repurchase and redemption of the 11% Notes.
      On May 28, 2003, the Company refinanced its then existing senior debt by entering into a new $600.0Our $1,322.5 million senior credit facility consisting thenconsists of a $197.5 million five-year term loan, with the loans thereunder being referred to by us as the “tranche A term loans,” a $725.0 million six-year term loan, with the loans thereunder being referred to by us as the “tranche B term loans,” and a $400.0 million term loan, a $120.0 million revolving credit facility and an $80.0 million additional term loan.
      During the second and third quarter of 2003, the Company recorded an aggregate of $35.3 million in non-recurring financing charges in connection with the foregoing recapitalization which consisted of senior subordinated note premiums of approximately $18.7 million, senior subordinated note issue costs and loan origination fees of approximately $11.9 million and other bank charges and fees of approximately $4.7 million.
Note H — Senior Credit Facilities
      The Company’s existing $600.0 million senior credit facilities consist of a $350.0 million term loan and a $250.0 millionfive-year revolving credit facility. In connection withThe tranche A term loans are payable in 19 consecutive quarterly installments equal to $2.5 million from December 31, 2006 through June 30, 2009, $5.0 million from September 30, 2009 through June 30, 2010 and $37.5 million from September 30, 2010 through June 30, 2011. The tranche B term loans are repayable in 23 consecutive quarterly installments equal to approximately $1.8 million from December 31, 2006 through June 30, 2011 and approximately $172.6 million from September 30, 2011 through June 30, 2012.
During the Company’s refinancing in 2003, the Company

62


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
recorded a $4.2 million non-cash charge to write off the remaining unamortized balance of financing costs in the thirdfourth quarter of 2004.2008, we repurchased approximately $40.6 million in tranche B term loans for approximately $36.3 million, resulting in a gain on extinguishment of debt, net of costs, of approximately $4.3 million. We further reduced outstanding indebtedness on our senior term loans during 2008 by making approximately $84.0 million in optional prepayments.
 
The senior creditdebt facilities as of December 31, 20052008 and 2004 are as2007 follows:
                              
    2005 2004
       
  Facility Maximum Amount Amount Maximum Amount Amount
  Maturity Facility Outstanding Available Facility Outstanding Available
               
    (In thousands)
Senior Credit Facility:                            
 Term Loan “B”  2010  $350,000  $344,750  $  $350,000  $348,250  $ 
 
Revolver(1)
  2009   250,000   75,000   67,534   250,000   60,000   84,435 
                      
       600,000   419,750   67,534   600,000   408,250   84,435 
Other Indebtedness:                            
 Line of credit      10,000   4,300   5,700   10,000      10,000 
                      
Total Debt Facilities     $610,000  $424,050  $73,234  $610,000  $408,250  $94,435 
                      
 
                             
     2008  2007 
  Facility
  Maximum
  Amount
  Amount
  Maximum
  Amount
  Amount
 
  Maturity  Facility  Outstanding  Available  Facility  Outstanding  Available 
  (In thousands) 
 
Senior Credit Facilities:                            
Tranche A Term Loans  2011  $197,500  $175,000  $  $197,500  $185,000  $ 
Tranche B Term Loans  2012   725,000   534,147      725,000   665,915    
Revolving Facility(1)
  2011   400,000      269,415   400,000   108,000   159,854 
                             
       1,322,500   709,147   269,415   1,322,500   958,915   159,854 
Other Indebtedness:                            
Line of credit      20,000   12,565   7,435   20,000   420   19,580 
                             
Total     $1,342,500  $721,712  $276,850  $1,342,500  $959,335  $179,434 
                             
(1)At December 31, 20052008 and 2004,2007, the amounts available under the Company’s revolving facilityRevolving Facility were reduced by approximately $107.5$130.6 million and $105.6$132.2 million, respectively, for our outstanding letters of credit used to support the Company’s insurance obligations. The Company provides assurance to its insurance providers that if they are not able to draw funds from the Company for claims paid, they have the ability to draw against the Company’s letters of credit. At that time, the Company would then owe the drawn amount to the financial institution providing the letter of credit. One of the Company’s letters of credit is renewed automatically every year unless the Company notifies the institution not to renew. The other letter of credit expires in August 2006, but is automatically renewed each year for a one year period unless the institution notifies the Company no later than thirty days prior to the applicable expiration date that such institution does not elect to renew the letter of credit for such additional one year period.
 
Borrowings under the Company’sour senior credit facilities bear interest at varying rates equal to the Eurodollar rate plus 1.00%.75% to 2.00%1.75%, or the prime rate plus up to 1.00%.75%, at our election. Interest periods range from seven days (for borrowings under the Company’srevolving credit facility only) to one, two, three or six months, at our election. The weighted average Eurodollar rate on our outstanding debt was 4.49%1.59% at December 31, 2005. None of the Company’s2008. The weighted average Eurodollar rate on our outstanding borrowingsdebt was 0.43% at December 31, 2005 utilized the prime rate option.February 20, 2009. The margins on the Eurodollar rate and on the prime rate, which are initially 1.75 and 0.75, respectively, may fluctuate dependent upon an increase or decrease in the Company’sour consolidated leverage ratio as defined by a pricing grid set forthincluded in itsthe credit agreement. For the year ended December 31, 2005, the average effective rate on outstanding borrowings under the senior credit facilities was 6.29%. The Company hasWe have not entered into any interest rate protection agreements with respect to term loans under the new senior credit facility.facilities. A commitment fee equal to 0.20%0.15% to 0.50% of the unused portion of the revolving credit facility is payable quarterly.quarterly, and fluctuates dependent upon an increase or decrease in our consolidated leverage ratio. The initial commitment fee is equal to 0.50% of the unused portion of the revolving facility.
 The Company’s
Our senior credit facilities are secured by a security interest in substantially all of our tangible and intangible assets, including intellectual property. Our senior credit facilities are also secured by a pledge of the capital stock of our wholly-owned U.S. subsidiaries (other than certain specified subsidiaries).


60


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Our senior credit facilities contain, without limitation, covenants that generally limit itsour ability to:
 • incur additional debt (including subordinated debt) in excess of $50$150.0 million at any one time outstanding;
 
 • repurchase itsour capital stock and 71/2% notes and pay cash dividends (subject to a restricted payments basket for which $113.1 million was available for use as of December 31, 2005);in the event the pro forma senior leverage ratio is greater than 2.50x;
 
 • incur liens or other encumbrances;
 
 • merge, consolidate or sell substantially all itsour property or business;
 
 • sell assets, other than inventory, in the ordinary course of business;
 
 • make investments or acquisitions unless it meetswe meet financial tests and other requirements;

63


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 • make capital expenditures; or
 
 • enter into an unrelated line of business.
 The Company’s
Our senior credit facilities require itus to comply with several financial covenants, including a maximum consolidated leverage ratio a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratioof no greater than 3.25:1 on or after December 31, 2008 and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio.ratio of no less than 1.35:1. The table below shows the required and actual ratios under the Company’sour credit facilities calculated as at December 31, 2005:2008:
           
  Required Ratio Actual Ratio
 
Maximum consolidated leverage ratio No greater than  2.75:3.25:1   2.34:1
Minimum consolidated interest coverage ratioNo less than4.0:16.42:2.43:1 
Minimum fixed charge coverage ratio No less than  1.50:1.35:1   1.84:1.86:1 
 
These financial covenants, as well as the related components of their computation, are defined in the amended and restated credit agreement governing our senior credit facility, which is included as an exhibit to this report. In accordance with the credit agreement, the maximum consolidated leverage ratio was calculated by dividing the consolidated funded debt outstanding at December 31, 2008 ($881.7 million) by consolidated EBITDA for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2008 ($363.2 million). For purposes of the covenant calculation, (i) “consolidated funded debt” is defined as outstanding indebtedness less cash in excess of $25 million, and (ii) “consolidated EBITDA” is generally defined as consolidated net income (a) plus the sum of income taxes, interest expense, depreciation and amortization expense, extraordinary non-cash expenses or losses, and other non-cash charges, and (b) minus the sum of interest income, extraordinary income or gains, and other non-cash income. Consolidated EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure that is presented not as a measure of operating results, but rather as a measure used to determine covenant compliance under our senior credit facilities.
The minimum fixed charge coverage ratio was calculated pursuant to the credit agreement by dividing consolidated EBITDA for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2008, as adjusted for certain capital expenditures ($485.4 million), by consolidated fixed charges for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2008 ($261.6 million). For purposes of the covenant calculation, “consolidated fixed charges” is defined as the sum of interest expense, lease expense, and mandatory debt repayments.
Events of default under the Company’sour senior credit facilityfacilities include customary events, such as a cross-acceleration provision in the event that it defaultswe default on other debt. In addition, an event of default under the senior credit facility would occur if there is a change of control.control occurs. This is defined to include the case where a third party becomes the beneficial owner of 35% or more ofRent-A-Center’s our voting stock or certain changes inRent-A-Center’s Board of Directors occur.occurs. An event of default would also occur if one or more judgments were entered against the Companyus of $20.0$30.0 million or more and such judgments were not satisfied or bonded pending appeal within 30 days after entry.
 
We utilize our revolving credit facility for the issuance of letters of credit, as well as to manage normal fluctuations in operational cash flow caused by the timing of cash receipts. In that regard, we may from time to time draw funds under the revolving credit facility for general corporate purposes. The followingfunds drawn on individual


61


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
occasions have varied in amounts of up to $98.0 million, with total amounts outstanding ranging from $2.0 million up to $108.0 million. The amounts drawn are generally outstanding for a short period of time and are generally paid down as cash is received from our operating activities.
The table below shows the scheduled maturitiesmaturity dates of theour senior term debt outstanding at December 31, 2005:
     
Year Ending December 31,  
   
  (In thousands)
2006 $3,500 
2007  3,500 
2008  3,500 
2009  168,000 
2010  166,250 
Thereafter   
    
  $344,750 
    
Note I — Subordinated Notes Payable2008.
 11% Senior Subordinated Notes. In December 2001,Rent-A-Center East issued $100.0 million of 11% senior subordinated notes, maturing on August 15, 2008, under an indenture dated as of December 19, 2001 amongRent-A-Center East, its subsidiary guarantors and The Bank of New York, as trustee. On May 2, 2002,Rent-A-Center East closed an exchange offer for, among other things, approximately $175.0 million of senior subordinated notes issued by it under a previous indenture, such that, on that date, all senior subordinated notes were governed by the terms of the 2001 indenture. The 2001 indenture contained covenants that limitedRent-A-Center East’s ability to, among other things, incur additional debt, grants liens to third parties, and pay dividends or repurchase stock. On May 6, 2003,Rent-A-Center East repurchased approximately $183.0 million of its then outstanding 11% Notes. On August 15, 2003,Rent-A-Center East redeemed the remaining outstanding 11% Notes.
     
Year Ending December 31,
   
  (In thousands) 
 
2009 $34,321 
2010  91,756 
2011  274,728 
2012  320,907 
     
  $721,712 
     
 
Note H —Subordinated Notes Payable
71/2% Senior Subordinated Notes.  On May 6, 2003,Rent-A-Center we issued $300.0 million in senior subordinated notes due 2010, bearing interest at 71/2%, pursuant to an indenture dated May 6, 2003, amongRent-A-Center, Inc., its subsidiary guarantors (the “Subsidiary Guarantors”) and The Bank of New York, as

64


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
trustee. The proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase and redemption of theour then outstanding 11% Notes.senior subordinated notes.
 
The 2003 indenture contains covenants that limitRent-A-Center’s our ability to:
 • incur additional debt;
 
 • sell assets or itsour subsidiaries;
 
 • grant liens to third parties;
 
 • pay cash dividends or repurchase stock (subject to a restricted payments basket for which $116.6$165.2 million was available for use as of December 31, 2005)2008); and
 
 • engage in a merger or sell substantially all of itsour assets.
 
Events of default under the 2003 indenture include customary events, such as a cross-acceleration provision in the event that the Company defaultswe default in the payment of other debt due at maturity or upon acceleration for default in an amount exceeding $50.0 million, as well as in the event a judgment is entered against the Companyus in excess of $50.0 million that is not discharged, bonded or insured.
 
The 71/2Notesnotes may be redeemed on or after May 1, 2006, atRent-A-Center’s our option, in whole or in part, at a premium declining from 103.75%. The premium for the period beginning May 1, 2008 through April 30, 2009 is 101.25%. The 71/2Notesnotes may be redeemed on or after May 1, 2009, at our option, in whole or in part, at par. The 71/2% notes also require that upon the occurrence of a change of control (as defined in the 2003 indenture), the holders of the notes have the right to requireRent-A-Center us to repurchase the notes at a price equal to 101% of the original aggregate principal amount, together with accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of repurchase. This would trigger an event of default under the Company’sour senior credit facilities.
Rent-A-Center and the Subsidiary Guarantors have fully, jointly and severally, and unconditionally guaranteed the obligations ofRent-A-Center with respect to the 71/2% Notes.Rent-A-Center has no independent assets or operations, and each Subsidiary Guarantor is 100% owned directly or indirectly byRent-A-Center. The only direct or indirect subsidiaries ofRent-A-Center that We are not guarantors are minor subsidiaries. There are no restrictions onrequired to maintain any financial ratios under the ability of any of the Subsidiary Guarantors to transfer funds toRent-A-Center in the form of loans, advances or dividends, except as provided by applicable law.2003 indenture.
Note J — Accrued Liabilities


62

         
  December 31,
   
  2005 2004
     
  (In thousands)
Taxes other than income $27,967  $27,190 
Accrued insurance costs  97,326   87,647 
Accrued compensation  28,882   23,653 
Accrued restructuring costs  5,455    
Accrued interest payable  5,224   4,605 
Accrued litigation costs  4,476   48,975 
Accrued other  22,501   15,765 
       
  $191,831  $207,835 
       
Note K — Redeemable Convertible Voting Preferred Stock
      In August 1998,Rent-A-Center issued $260.0 million of redeemable convertible voting preferred stock with a $.01 par value. In connection with such issuance,Rent-A-Center entered into a registration rights

65


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
agreement with affiliates of Apollo which, among other things, granted them two rights to request that their shares be registered, and a registration rights agreement with an affiliate of Bear Stearns, which granted them the right to participate in any company-initiated registration of shares, subject to certain exceptions. In May 2002, Apollo exercised one of their two rights to request that their shares be registered and an affiliate of Bear Stearns elected to participate in such registration. In connection therewith, Apollo and the affiliate of Bear Stearns converted 97,197 shares ofRent-A-Center’s preferred stock held by them into 3,500,000 shares (on a pre-split basis) ofRent-A-Center’s common stock, which they sold in the May 2002 public offering that was the subject of Apollo’s request.Rent-A-Center did not receive any of the proceeds from this offering.
      On August 5, 2002, the first date in whichRent-A-Center had the right to optionally redeem the shares of preferred stock, the holders ofRent-A-Center’s preferred stock converted all but two shares ofRent-A-Center’s preferred stock held by them into 7,281,548 shares ofRent-A-Center’s common stock (on a pre-split basis). As a result, the dividend onRent-A-Center’s preferred stock was substantially eliminated.
Rent-A-Center’s preferred stock was convertible, at any time, into shares ofRent-A-Center’s common stock at a conversion price equal to $11.174 per share, and had a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, plus all accrued and unpaid dividends. No distributions were permitted to holders of common stock until the holders of the preferred stock had received the liquidation preference. Dividends accrued on a quarterly basis, at the rate of $37.50 per annum, per share. During 2002,Rent-A-Center accounted for shares of preferred stock distributed as dividends in-kind at the greater of the stated value or the value of the common stock obtainable upon conversion on the payment date. During 2002,Rent-A-Center paid approximately $8.2 million in preferred dividends by issuing 8,151 shares of preferred stock. During 2004 and 2003,Rent-A-Center paid all preferred stock dividends in cash.
      In May 2005, Apollo sold all of the remaining shares ofRent-A-Center common stock held by them in a public offering which closed on May 31, 2005.Rent-A-Center did not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of the shares by Apollo. In connection with such sale, Apollo converted the two issued and outstanding shares ofRent-A-Center Series C preferred stock into 180 shares of common stock, all of which were sold in the public offering. As a result of the conversion, no shares ofRent-A-Center Series C preferred stock remain outstanding. In addition, as a result of the sale by Apollo of all of the shares ofRent-A-Center common stock held by them, the stockholders agreement with Apollo terminated pursuant to its terms.
Note L — Income Taxes
 The income tax provision reconciled to the tax computed at the statutory Federal rate is:
             
  Year Ended December 31,
   
  2005 2004 2003
       
Tax at statutory rate  35.0%  35.0%   35.0% 
State income taxes, net of federal benefit (expense)  (0.3)%(1)  2.5%   2.3% 
Effect of foreign operations, net of foreign tax credits  0.1%  0.1%   0.1% 
Other, net  0.3%  0.4%   0.2% 
          
Total  35.1%  38.0%   37.6% 
          
(1) Includes the effects of a $3.3 million state tax reserve due to a change in estimate related to potential loss exposures.

66


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Note I —Accrued Liabilities
         
  December 31, 
  2008  2007 
  (In thousands) 
 
Accrued insurance costs $126,006  $117,708 
Accrued litigation costs  11,274   21,915 
Accrued compensation  44,734   38,975 
Deferred revenue  29,394   33,915 
Taxes other than income  20,379   28,418 
Accrued store close plan related to Rent-Way  1,830   4,125 
Accrued capital lease obligations  8,214   13,435 
Accrued interest payable  4,340   10,760 
Accrued restructuring costs  7,357   23,152 
Accrued other  36,173   18,017 
         
  $289,701  $310,420 
         
Note J —Income Taxes
The reconciliation of income tax expense at the federal statutory rate of 35% to actual tax expense is as follows:
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
 
Tax at statutory rate  35.0%  35.0%  35.0%
State income taxes, net of federal benefit (expense)  2.0%  (1.7)%  1.2%
Effect of foreign operations, net of foreign tax credits     0.5%  (0.1)%
Other, net  (0.1)%  0.6%  1.0%
             
Total  36.9%  34.4%  37.1%
             
The components of the income tax provisionexpense are as follows:
               
  Year Ended December 31,
   
  2005 2004 2003
       
  (In thousands)
Current expense            
 Federal $108,667  $60,996  $53,615 
 State  5,073   1,844   9,382 
 Foreign  1,417   2,571   2,232 
          
  Total current  115,157   65,411   65,229 
          
Deferred expense            
 Federal  (35,728)  22,307   43,349 
 State  (6,099)  7,806   756 
          
  Total deferred  (41,827)  30,113   44,105 
          
  Total $73,330  $95,524  $109,334 
          
 Deferred tax assets (liabilities) consist of the following:
          
  December 31,
   
  2005 2004
     
  (In thousands)
Deferred tax assets        
 State net operating loss carryforwards $2,101  $2,101 
 Accrued expenses  8,058   12,968 
 Property assets  14,693   15,479 
 Foreign tax credit carryforwards  827   1,501 
       
   25,679   32,049 
Valuation allowance  (827)  (1,501)
Deferred tax liabilities        
 Rental merchandise  (130,019)  (191,960)
 Intangible assets  (16,037)  (1,619)
       
   (146,056)  (193,579)
       
 Net deferred taxes $(121,204) $(163,031)
       
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (In thousands) 
 
Current expense            
Federal $399  $6,179  $63,808 
State  2,574   14,437   1,024 
Foreign  1,192   1,145   752 
             
Total current  4,165   21,761   65,584 
             
Deferred expense            
Federal  73,015   35,808   (8,455)
State  4,538   (17,551)  3,917 
             
Total deferred  77,553   18,257   (4,538)
             
Total $81,718  $40,018  $61,046 
             


63

67


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Note M
Deferred tax assets (liabilities) consist of the following:
         
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2008  2007 
  (In thousands) 
 
Deferred tax assets        
Federal net operating loss carryforwards $47,656  $57,124 
State net operating loss carryforwards  30,225   26,353 
Accrued liabilities  39,240   43,743 
Property assets  20,462   24,211 
Other assets including credits  1,174   14,448 
Foreign tax credit carryforwards  2,325   395 
         
   141,082   166,274 
Valuation allowance  (10,232)  (9,320)
Deferred tax liabilities        
Rental merchandise  (188,152)  (166,008)
Intangible assets  (29,914)  (624)
         
   (218,066)  (166,632)
         
Net deferred taxes $(87,216) $(9,678)
         
At December 31, 2008, we had approximately $137.2 million of federal net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards available to offset future taxable income which expire between 2018 and 2025 and approximately $550.0 million of state NOL carryforwards that expire between 2009 and 2026. All of our federal NOLs and approximately $170.0 million of our state NOLs represent acquired NOLs and their carryforwards are subject to annual limitations for U.S. tax purposes, including Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. A valuation allowance was provided on our acquired state NOLs which are expected to expire before they can be utilized.
We are subject to federal, state, local and foreign income taxes. We are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state, foreign and local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2001. The appeals process related to the IRS audit for the taxable years 2001 through 2003 has been completed. We have agreed with the results of the appeals process with the exception of one issue with respect to the 2003 tax year. This disputed issue arises also in our 2004 and 2005 tax years, the examination of which is currently in the appeals process as discussed below. We believe the position and supporting case law applied by the IRS are incorrectly applied to our situation and that our fact pattern is distinguishable from the IRS’ position. We intend to vigorously defend our position on the issue. The IRS has concluded its examination of our income tax returns for 2004 and 2005. We have requested a conference with the IRS Appeals Office to discuss the 2004 and 2005 proposed adjustments related to the disputed issue from our 2003 examination. The remaining 2001 through 2003, as well as the 2004 and 2005 contested adjustments have been resolved. We do not anticipate that adjustments, if any, regarding the 2003, 2004 and 2005 disputed issue will result in a material change to our consolidated statement of earnings, financial condition, statement of cash flows or earnings per share.
On January 1, 2007 we adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — Commitments and Contingenciesan interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109(“FIN 48”). Under FIN 48, we recognize the financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely than not sustain the position following an audit. For tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not threshold, the amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority. At the adoption date, we applied FIN 48 to all tax


64


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 The Company leases its office,
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
positions for which the statute of limitations remained open. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, we were not required to recognize an increase or a decrease in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits as of January 1, 2007. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
     
  (In thousands) 
 
Balance at January 1, 2007 $7,064 
Additions based on tax positions related to current year   
Additions for tax positions of prior years  784 
Reductions for tax positions of prior years  (217)
Settlements   
     
Balance at January 1, 2008  7,631 
Additions based on tax positions related to current year   
Additions for tax positions of prior years  701 
Reductions for tax positions of prior years  (817)
Settlements  (5,458)
     
Balance at December 31, 2008 $2,057 
     
Included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2008 is $1.3 million, net of federal benefit, which, if ultimately recognized, will reduce our annual effective tax rate.
In adopting FIN 48 on January 1, 2007, we changed our previous method of classifying interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense to classifying interest accrued as interest expense and penalties as operating expenses. Because the transition rules of FIN 48 do not permit the retroactive restatement of prior period financial statements, our comparative financial statements for 2006 continue to reflect interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense. We recorded interest expense of approximately $300,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008. We accrued approximately $1.2 million as of December 31, 2008, for the payment of interest and penalties.
Note K —Commitments and Contingencies
Leases
We lease our service center and store facilities and most delivery vehicles. The office space and certainCertain of the store leases contain escalation clauses for increased taxes and operating expenses. Rental expense was $194.3$215.8 million, $179.6$230.4 million and $154.4$200.6 million for 2005, 2004,2008, 2007 and 2003,2006, respectively. Capital leases include certain transportation equipment assumed in the Rent-Way acquisition. Future minimum rental payments under operatingoperating/capital leases with remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year at December 31, 20052008 are as follows:
     
Year Ending December 31,  
   
  (In thousands)
2006 $149,976 
2007  123,725 
2008  96,790 
2009  64,299 
2010  28,935 
Thereafter  2,710 
    
  $466,435 
    
 
         
Year Ending December 31,
 Operating Leases  Capital Leases 
  (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
 
2009 $172,947  $5,039 
2010  134,168   3,067 
2011  93,332   1,112 
2012  59,484   302 
2013  27,380    
Thereafter  5,890    
         
   493,201   9,520 
Less amount representing interest obligations under capital lease     (1,306)
         
  $493,201  $8,214 
         


65


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Our investment in equipment under capital leases are as follows:
         
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2008  2007 
  (In thousands) 
 
Equipment under capital lease $25,261  $32,386 
Less accumulated amortization  (17,074)  (18,900)
         
Equipment under capital lease, net $8,187  $13,486 
         
Litigation
From time to time, the Company iswe, along with our subsidiaries, are party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. We account for our litigation contingencies pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No. 5 and FIN 14, which require that we accrue for losses that are both probable and reasonably estimable. We expense legal fees and expenses incurred in connection with the defense of all of our litigation at the time such amounts are invoiced or otherwise made known to us.
Our accruals relating to probable losses for our outstanding litigation follow:
         
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2008  2007 
  (In millions) 
 
Shafer/Johnson Matter
 $1.8  $11.0 
California Attorney General Settlement
  9.4   9.6 
Other Litigation
  0.1   1.1 
Legal Fees and Expenses
     0.2 
         
Total Accrual $11.3  $21.9 
         
We continue to monitor our litigation exposure, and will review the adequacy of our legal reserves on a quarterly basis in accordance with applicable accounting rules. Except as described below, the Company iswe are not currently a party to any material litigation. The ultimate outcome of the Company’s litigation is uncertain and, the amount of any loss it may incur, if any, cannot in its judgment be reasonably estimated. Accordingly, other than as set forth above, we have not established any other reserves for our outstanding litigation.
California Attorney General Inquiry.  In January 2009, we paid $9.4 million in accordance with respectthe settlement with the California Attorney General.
Eric Shafer, et al. v.Rent-A-Center, Inc.  We recorded a pre-tax expense of $11.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2007 related to the settlement of thePucci/Chess matter, the prospective settlement of theRose/ Madrigalmatter discussed below as well as anticipated legal fees and expenses for its other litigation matters, no provision has been made in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for any such loss.
Colon v. Thorn Americas, Inc. The plaintiff filed this class action in November 1997 in New York state court. This matter was assumed by the Company in connection with the Thorn Americas acquisition. The plaintiff acknowledges thatrent-to-own transactions in New York are subject to the provisions of New York’s Rental Purchase Statute but contends the Rental Purchase Statute does not provide the Company immunity from suit for other statutory violations. The plaintiff alleges the Company has a duty to disclose effective interest under New York consumer protection laws, and seeks damages and injunctive relief for failure to do so. This suit also alleges violations relating to excessive and unconscionable pricing, late fees, harassment, undisclosed charges, and the ease of use and accuracy of payment records. In the prayer for relief, the plaintiff requests class certification, injunctive relief requiring the Company to cease certain marketing practices and price its rental purchase contracts in certain ways, unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, rescission of the class members contracts, an order placing in trust all moneys received by the Company in connection with the rental of merchandise during the class period, treble damages, attorney’s fees, filing fees and costs of suit, pre- and post-judgment interest, and any further relief granted by the court. The plaintiff has not alleged a specific monetary amount with respect to the request for damages.
      The proposed class includes all New York residents who were party to the Company’srent-to-own contracts from November 26, 1994. In November 2000, following interlocutory appeal by both parties from the denial of cross-motions for summary judgment, the Company obtained a favorable ruling from the Appellate Division of the State of New York, dismissing the plaintiff’s claims based on the alleged failure to disclose an effective interest rate. The plaintiff’s other claims were not dismissed. The plaintiff moved to certify a state-wide class in December 2000. The plaintiff’s class certification motion was heard by the court on November 7, 2001 and, on September 12, 2002, the court issued an opinion denying in part and granting in part the plaintiff’s requested certification. The opinion grants certification as to all of the plaintiff’s claims except the plaintiff’s pricing claims pursuant to the Rental Purchase Statute, as to which certification was denied. The parties have differing views as to the effect of the court’s opinion, and accordingly, the court

68


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
granted the parties permission to submit competing orders as to the effect of the opinion on the plaintiff’s specific claims. Both proposed orders were submitted to the court on March 27, 2003, and on May 30, 2003, the court held a hearing regarding such orders. No clarifying order has yet been entered by the court.
      From June 2003 until May 2005, there was no activity in this case. On May 18, 2005, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s claim and to decertify the class, based upon the plaintiff’s failure to schedule her claim in this matter in her earlier voluntary bankruptcy proceeding. The plaintiff opposed the Company’s motion and asked the court for an opportunity to find a substitute class representative in the event the court determined Ms. Colon was no longer adequate. On January 17, 2006, the court issued an order denying the Company’s motion, but noted that no motion to intervene to add additional class representatives had been filed. A conference with the court has been scheduled for March 14, 2006. If the court ultimately enters a final certification order, the Company intends to pursue an interlocutory appeal of such certification order.
      The Company believes these claims are without merit and will continue to vigorously defend itself in this case. However, the Company cannot assure you that it will be found to have no liability in this matter.
Terry Walker, et. al. v.Rent-A-Center, Inc., et. al. On January 4, 2002, a putative class action was filed against the Company and certain of its current and former officers and directors by Terry Walker in federal court in Texarkana, Texas. The complaint alleged that the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and/or Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by issuing false and misleading statements and omitting material facts regarding the Company’s financial performance and prospects for the third and fourth quarters of 2001. The complaint purported to be brought on behalf of all purchasers of the Company’s common stock from April 25, 2001 through October 8, 2001 and sought damages in unspecified amounts. Similar complaints were consolidated by the court with theWalkermatter in October 2002.
      On November 25, 2002, the lead plaintiffs in theWalkermatter filed an amended consolidated complaint which added certain of the Company’s outside directors as defendants to the Exchange Act claims. The amended complaint also added additional claims that the Company, and certain of its current and former officers and directors, violated various provisions of the Securities Act as a result of alleged misrepresentations and omissions in connection with an offering in May 2001 and also added the managing underwriters in that offering as defendants.
      On February 7, 2003, the Company, along with certain officer and director defendants, filed a motion to dismiss the matter as well as a motion to transfer venue. In addition, the Company’s outside directors named in the matter separately filed a motion to dismiss the Securities Act claims on statute of limitations grounds. On February 19, 2003, the underwriter defendants also filed a motion to dismiss the matter. The plaintiffs filed response briefs to these motions, to which the Company replied on May 21, 2003. A hearing was held by the court on June 26, 2003 to hear each of these motions.
      On September 30, 2003, the court granted the Company’s motion to dismiss without prejudice, dismissed without prejudice the outside directors’ and underwriters’ separate motions to dismiss and denied the Company’s motion to transfer venue. In its order on the motions to dismiss, the court granted the lead plaintiffs leave to replead the case within certain parameters.
      On July 7, 2004, the plaintiffs again repled their claims by filing a third amended consolidated complaint, raising allegations of similar violations against the same parties generally based upon alleged facts not previously asserted. The Company, along with certain officer and director defendants and the underwriter defendants, filed motions to dismiss the third amended consolidated complaint on August 23, 2004. A hearing on the motions was held on April 14, 2005. On July 25, 2005, the court ruled on these motions, dismissing with prejudice the claims against the Company’s outside directors as well as the underwriter defendants, but denying the Company’s motion to dismiss. In evaluating this motion to dismiss, the court was required to view the pleadings in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs and to take the plaintiffs’ allegations as true. On

69


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
August 18, 2005, the Company filed a motion to certify the dismissal order for an interlocutory appeal, which was denied on November 14, 2005. Discovery in this matter has now commenced. A hearing on class certification is scheduled for June 22, 2006.
      The Company continues to believe the plaintiffs’ claims in this matter are without merit and intends to vigorously defend itself as this matter progresses. However, the Company cannot assure you that it will be found to have no liability in this matter.
California Attorney General Inquiry. During the second quarter of 2004, the Company received an inquiry from the California Attorney General regarding its business practices in California with respect to its cash prices and its membership program. The Company met with representatives of the Attorney General’s office during the first quarter and fourth quarter of 2005, and provided additional information with respect to its membership program as requested. The Company is continuing to discuss these issues with the Attorney General’s office.
State Wage and Hour Class Actions
      The Company recently settled a material action pending against it in Oregon, and is currently subject to various material actions pending against it in the states of California and Washington, all of which allege it violated the wage and hour laws of such states.
Rob Pucci, et. al v.Rent-A-Center, Inc; Jeremy Chess et. al. v.Rent-A-Center, Inc. et. al.; Clemmons et. al. v.Rent-A-Center, Inc., et. al. On August 20, 2001, the putative class action entitledRob Pucci, et.Eric Shafer et al. v.Rent-A-Center, Inc. was filed in state court in Multnomah County, Oregon alleging the Company violated various provisions of Oregon state law regarding overtime, lunch and work breaks, that it failed to pay all wages due to the Company’s Oregon employees, and various contract claims that it promised but failed to pay overtime.Puccisought to represent a class of all present and former executive assistants, inside/outside managers and account managers employed by the Company within the six year period prior to the filing of the complaint as to the contract claims, and three years as to the statutory claims, and sought class certification, payments for all unpaid wages under Oregon law, statutory and civil penalties, costs and disbursements, pre- and post-judgment interest in the amount of 9% per annum and attorneys fees.
      On July 25, 2002, the plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification and on July 31, 2002, the Company filed its motion for summary judgment. On January 15, 2003, the court orally granted its motion for summary judgment in part, ruling that the plaintiffs were prevented from recovering overtime payments at the rate of “time and a half,” but stated that the plaintiffs may recover “straight-time” to the extent plaintiffs could prove purported class members worked in excess of forty hours in a work week but were not paid for such time worked. The court denied the Company’s motion for summary judgment on the remaining claims.
      On October 10, 2003, the court issued an opinion letter stating that it would certify a class and not permit an interlocutory appeal, and issued its written order to that effect on December 9, 2003.
      On March 17, 2005,Pucciclass members Jeremy Chess and Chad Clemmons filed an amended class action complaint entitledJeremy ChessVictor E. Johnson et al. v.Rent-A-Center, Inc. et al, alleging similar claims ascoordinated matters pending in state court in Los Angeles, California. Due to fewer class members eligible to participate in the plaintiffs inPucci and seeking unspecified statutory and contractual damages and penalties,settlement than originally estimated, as well as injunctive relief. TheChessnegotiated reductions in settlement payments to certain plaintiffs, soughtthe maximum claim amount remaining to represent abe paid was reduced by approximately $2.4 million during the fourth quarter of 2008. We also paid settlement costs and plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees in the amount of approximately $4.4 million, and settlement payments in the aggregate amount of approximately $2.4 million during the fourth quarter of 2008. We expect to fund the maximum remaining settlement payments of approximately $1.8 million during 2009.
In our history, we have defended class action lawsuits alleging various regulatory violations and have paid material amounts to settle such claims. We cannot assure you that we will not be the subject of all present and former executive assistants, inside/outside managers and account managers employed bysimilar lawsuits in the Company within the six year period prior to the filing of the complaint as to the contract claims, and three years as to the statutory claims. On April 15, 2005, the Company filed pleadings removing the case to the federal court for the District of Oregon under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005. TheChessplaintiffs were represented by the same attorneys as thePucciplaintiffs.future.


66

70


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 On June 23, 2005, the Company reached an agreement in principle to settle the claims in
PucciGuaranteeandChess. Under the settlement, the Company agreed to pay $1.75 million to settle all class claims, including payments to the class and its representatives, the plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees and administrative costs, subject to adjustment based upon the size of the class. The final class included approximately 777 current and former account managers, inside/outside managers, and executive assistant managers that were employed by the Company in Oregon. In connection therewith, the plaintiffs’ counsel in thePucciandChessmatters filed a new class action complaint in Federal court entitledClemmons et al v.Rent-A-Center Inc., et al, alleging substantially similar claims and seeking similar damages as inPucciandChessthrough the date of filing. The parties used theClemmonscase to consolidate thePucciandChess claims, and facilitate final approval, administration and distribution of the settlement. Notice of the settlement was mailed to class members on or about November 15, 2005 and no class member objected to the settlement or sought exclusion from the class. As a result of the prospective settlement, $1.9 million was reserved with respect to this matter as of December 31, 2005, covering the anticipated settlement and our attorneys’ fees. On January 20, 2006, thePucciandClemmons courts approved the final settlement, entered a final judgment and dismissed the respective cases. The Company funded the settlement in February 2006.
 Jeremy Burdusis, et al. v.Rent-A-Center, Inc., et al./ Israel French, et al. v.Rent-A-Center, Inc. These matters pending in Los Angeles, California were filed on October 23, 2001, and October 30, 2001, respectively, and allege similar violations of the wage and hour laws of California as those inPucci. The same law firm inPucciis seeking to represent the purported class inBurdusis. TheBurdusisandFrenchproceedings are pending before the same judge in California. On March 24, 2003, theBurdusiscourt denied the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification in that case, which the Company views as a favorable development in that proceeding. On April 25, 2003, the plaintiffs inBurdusisfiled a notice of appeal of that ruling, and on May 8, 2003, theBurdusiscourt, at the Company’s request, stayed further proceedings inBurdusisandFrenchpending the resolution on appeal of the court’s denial of class certification inBurdusis. In June 2004, theBurdusisplaintiffs filed their appellate brief. The Company’s response brief was filed in September 2004, and theBurdusisplaintiffs filed their reply in October 2004. On February 9, 2005, the California Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the trial court’s denial of class certification inBurdusisand directed the trial court to reconsider its ruling in light of two other recent appellate court decisions, including the opinions of the California Supreme Court inSav-On Drugs Stores, Inc. v. Superior Court, and of the California appeals court inBell v. Farmers Insurance Exchange. After remand, the plaintiffs filed a motion with the trial court seeking to remove from the case the trial court judge who previously denied their motion for class certification. The trial court denied the motion. In response, plaintiffs’ filed a petition for writ of mandate with the California Court of Appeals requesting review of the trial court’s decision. The California Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in this matter on August 29, 2005, and ruled against the plaintiffs, denying the requested relief. The case is now being returned to the trial court as previously ordered.
      On October 30, 2003, the plaintiffs’ counsel inBurdusisandFrenchfiled a new non-class lawsuit in Orange County, California entitledKris Corso, et al. v.Rent-A-Center, Inc. The plaintiffs’ counsel later amended this complaint to add additional plaintiffs, totaling approximately 339 individuals. The claims made are substantially the same as those inBurdusis. On January 16, 2004, the Company filed a demurrer to the complaint, arguing, among other things, that the plaintiffs inCorsowere misjoined. On February 19, 2004, the court granted the Company’s demurrer on the misjoinder argument, with leave for the plaintiffs to replead. On March 8, 2004, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint inCorso, increasing the number of plaintiffs to approximately 400. The claims in the amended complaint are substantially the same as those inBurdusis. The Company filed a demurrer with respect to the amended complaint on April 12, 2004, which the court granted on May 6, 2004. However, the court allowed the plaintiffs to again replead the action on a representative basis, which they did on May 26, 2004. The Company subsequently filed a demurrer with respect to the newly repled action, which the court granted on August 12, 2004. The court subsequently stayed theCorsomatter pending the outcome of theBurdusismatter. On March 16, 2005, the court lifted the stay and on April 12, 2005, the

71


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Company answered the amended complaint. Discovery is now proceeding. On January 30, 2006, theCorsoCourt heard a motion to coordinateCorsowith theBurdusisandFrenchactions. TheCorsocourt recommended thatCorsobe coordinated with the other actions before the judge in theBurdusisandFrench matters. The Judicial Council has yet to act on the recommendation.
      The Company believes the claims asserted inBurdusis, FrenchandCorsoare without merit and intends to vigorously oppose each of these cases. The Company cannot assure you, however, that it will be found to have no liability in these matters. As of December 31, 2005, the Company operated 150 stores in California.
Kevin Rose, et al. v.Rent-A-Center, Inc. et al. This matter pending in Clark County, Washington was filed on June 26, 2001, and alleges similar violations of the wage and hour laws of Washington as those inPucci. The same law firm who represented the class inPuccisought to represent the purported class in this matter. On May 14, 2003, theRosecourt denied the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification in that case. On June 3, 2003, the plaintiffs inRosefiled a notice of appeal, which was subsequently denied. Following the denial by the Court of Appeals, the plaintiffs’ counsel filed 14 county-wide putative class actions in Washington with substantially the same claims as inRose. In April 2005, the plaintiffs’ counsel filed another putative county-wide lawsuit and subsequently the plaintiffs’ counsel filed another putative state-wide lawsuit in federal court in Washington, bringing the total to 16. The purported classes in the county-wide class actions ranged from approximately 20 individuals to approximately 100 individuals.
      In November 2005, the Company reached an agreement in principle to settle for $1.25 million all of the pending lawsuits and related matters bought by the plaintiffs’ counsel in Washington on an agreed state-wide class basis. In connection therewith, the parties agreed to seek class settlement in the Superior Court of Yakima County, Washington, where one of the putative county-wide class actions,Madrigal et al. v.Rent-A-Center, is pending. On January 13, 2006, the court inMadrigalpreliminarily approved the class settlement. The class consists of approximately 1,300 class members, and notice of settlement has now been sent. Objections to the settlement are due March 15, 2006, and a final approval hearing before the court is scheduled for April 21, 2006. Accordingly, at December 31, 2005, approximately $1.3 million was reserved to fund the prospective settlement as well as the Company’s attorneys’ fees.
      While the Company believes that the terms of the prospective settlement are fair, there can be no assurance that the settlement, if completed, will be finally approved by the court in its present form.
ColorTyme Guarantee.  ColorTyme is a party to an agreement with Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc. (“Wells Fargo”), who provides $50.0$35.0 million in aggregate financing to qualifying franchisees of ColorTyme generally of up to five times their average monthly revenues. Under the Wells Fargo agreement, upon an event of default by the franchisee under agreements governing this financing and upon the occurrence of certain other events, Wells Fargo can assign the loans and the collateral securing such loans to ColorTyme, with ColorTyme paying the outstanding debt to Wells Fargo and then succeeding to the rights of Wells Fargo under the debt agreements, including the right to foreclose on the collateral. The Wells Fargo agreement expires in October 2006. Although the Company believes it will be able to renew its existing agreement or find other financing arrangements, there can be no assurance that it will not need to fund the foregoing guarantee upon the expiration of the existing agreement.on September 30, 2010. An additional $20.0 million of financing is provided by Texas Capital Bank, National Association (“Texas Capital Bank”) under an agreement similar to the Wells Fargo financing.Rent-A-Center East, Inc., a subsidiary ofRent-A-Center, guarantees the obligations of ColorTyme under each of these agreements, excluding the effects of any amounts that could be recovered under collateralization provisions, up to a maximum amount of $70.0$55.0 million, of which $30.3$24.5 million was outstanding as of December 31, 2005. Mark E. Speese,Rent-A-Center’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, is a passive investor in Texas Capital Bank, owning less than 1% of its outstanding equity.

72


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Note N — Stock Based Compensation2008.
 Rent-A-Center’s Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”)
Note L —Stock-Based Compensation
We maintain long-term incentive plans for the benefit of certain employees, consultants and directors providesdirectors. Our plans consist of the BoardRent-A-Center, Inc. Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Prior Plan”), theRent-A-Center, Inc. 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”), and theRent-A-Center, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Incentive Plan”), which are collectively known as the “Plans.”
The 2006 Plan authorizes the issuance of Directors broad discretion7,000,000 shares ofRent-A-Center’s common stock that may be issued pursuant to awards granted under the 2006 Plan, of which no more than 3,500,000 shares may be issued in creatingthe form of restricted stock, deferred stock or similar forms of stock awards which have value without regard to future appreciation in value of or dividends declared on the underlying shares of common stock. In applying these limitations, the following shares will be deemed not to have been issued: (1) shares covered by the unexercised portion of an option that terminates, expires, or is canceled or settled in cash, and (2) shares that are forfeited or subject to awards that are forfeited, canceled, terminated or settled in cash. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, there are 1,589,923 and 1,350,749 shares, respectively, allocated to equity incentives. awards outstanding in the 2006 Plan.
We acquired the Equity Incentive Plan (formerly known as the Rent-Way, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan) in conjunction with our acquisition of Rent-Way in 2006. There were 2,468,461 shares of our common stock reserved for issuance under the Equity Incentive Plan. There were 476,783 and 389,805 shares allocated to equity awards outstanding in the Equity Incentive Plan at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Under the Prior Plan, 14,562,865 shares ofRent-A-Center’s common stock have beenwere reserved for issuance under stock options, stock appreciation rights or restricted stock grants. Options granted to the Company’sour employees under the Prior Plan generally become exercisable over a period of one to four years from the date of grant and may be exercised up to a maximum of 10 years from the date of grant. Options granted to directors arewere immediately exercisable. There have beenwere no grants of stock appreciation rights and all options have beenequity awards were granted with fixed prices. At December 31, 2005,2008 and 2007, there were 8,878,2602,747,016 and 3,143,317 shares, available for issuancerespectively, allocated to equity awards outstanding under the Prior Plan. The Prior Plan of which 5,018,977 shares were allocated to options currently outstanding. However, pursuant towas terminated on May 19, 2006, upon the termsapproval by the stockholders of the Plan, when an optionee leaves2006 Plan.
Under SFAS 123R, compensation costs are recognized net of estimated forfeitures over the Company’s employ, unvestedaward’s requisite service period on a straight line basis. For the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, we recorded stock-based compensation expense, net of related taxes, of approximately $2.1 million and $3.3 million, respectively, related to stock options granted to that employee terminate and become available for re-issuance under the Plan. Vested options not exercised within 90 days from the date the optionee leaves the Company’s employ terminate and become available for re-issuance under the Plan.restricted stock units awarded.


67


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Information with respect to stock option activity related to the PlanPlans follows. The information for the Plans is combined because the characteristics of the awards are similar.
                 
     Weighted
  Weighted
    
     Average
  Average
  Aggregate
 
  Equity Awards
  Exercise
  Remaining
  Intrinsic
 
  Outstanding  Price  Contractual Life  Value 
           (In thousands) 
 
Balance outstanding at January 1, 2008  4,883,871  $21.49   6.56 years  $5,024 
Granted  756,995   15.03         
Exercised  (229,605)  13.82      $1,659 
Forfeited  (597,539)  23.97         
                 
Balance outstanding at December 31, 2008  4,813,722  $20.73   6.01 years  $9,204 
                 
Exercisable at December 31, 2008  3,252,534  $20.02   4.81 years  $8,095 
The intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $2.5 million and $10.6 million, respectively.
The fair value of unvested options that we expect to result in compensation expense was approximately $5.5 million with a weighted average number of years to vesting of 2.45 years at December 31, 2008. The total number of unvested options was 1,561,188 and 1,807,348, with $1.1 million intrinsic value and no intrinsic value at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. There were 58,860 and 53,300 restricted stock units outstanding as follows:of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
                         
  At December 31,
   
  2005 2004 2003
       
    Weighted   Weighted   Weighted
    Average   Average   Average
    Exercise   Exercise   Exercise
  Shares Price Shares Price Shares Price
             
Outstanding at beginning of year  5,231,538  $17.62   6,206,897  $15.78   8,627,690  $14.13 
Granted  1,001,000   23.80   838,500   29.30   1,335,438   23.31 
Exercised  (690,608)  13.78   (1,144,295)  14.51   (2,302,494)  12.94 
Forfeited  (522,953)  24.13   (669,564)  20.55   (1,453,737)  17.37 
                      
Outstanding at end of year  5,018,977  $18.70   5,231,538  $17.62   6,206,897  $15.78 
                      
Options exercisable at end of year  3,406,505  $16.16   2,612,207  $13.98   1,922,152  $11.88 
                      
 
The weighted average fair value per share of unvested options granted during 2005, 2004 and 2003 was $9.05, $12.93, and $13.90, respectively, all of which were granted at market value. Information about Plan stock options outstanding at December 31, 2005 is summarized as follows:2008 and 2007 was $3.55 and $4.34, respectively. The weighted average fair value of options forfeited during the year ended December 31, 2008 was $5.62.
             
  Options Outstanding
   
    Weighted Average  
  Number Remaining Weighted Average
Range of Exercise Prices Outstanding Contractual Life Exercise Price
       
$2.68 to $7.40  75,103   2.35 years  $6.39 
$7.41 to $11.40  1,461,292   5.22 years  $10.05 
$11.41 to $13.55  475,730   5.05 years  $13.19 
$13.56 to $19.62  538,033   7.48 years  $18.78 
$19.63 to $26.20  1,189,393   7.23 years  $21.54 
$26.21 to $32.76  1,178,490   8.44 years  $28.29 
$32.77 to $33.34  100,936   8.25 years  $33.34 
           
   5,018,977         
           
The total number of options vested during the year ended December 31, 2008 was 710,146, with a weighted average fair value of $6.08. The total fair value of options vested during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, was $4.3 million, $5.9 million and $10.3 million, respectively.
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, the weighted average fair values of the options granted under the Plans were calculated using the binomial method with the following assumptions:
Employee options:
Risk free interest rate (1.62% to 3.17%)Weighted average 2.43%
Expected dividend yield
Expected life4.20 years
Expected volatility (33.85% to 53.58%)Weighted average 42.08%
Employee stock options granted732,995
Weighted average grant date fair value$4.66
Non-employee director options:
Risk free interest rate3.54%
Expected dividend yield
Expected life6.90 years
Expected volatility41.26%
Non-employee director stock options granted24,000
Weighted average grant date fair value$7.02


68

73


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
         
  Options Exercisable
   
  Number Weighted Average
Range of Exercise Prices Exercisable Exercise Price
     
$2.68 to $7.40  75,103  $6.38 
$7.41 to $11.40  1,461,292  $10.05 
$11.41 to $13.55  393,223  $13.12 
$13.56 to $19.62  336,906  $18.56 
$19.63 to $26.20  605,273  $21.36 
$26.21 to $32.76  477,522  $28.57 
$32.77 to $33.34  57,186  $33.34 
        
   3,406,505     
        
 
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, the weighted average fair values of the options granted under the Plans were calculated using the binomial method with the following assumptions:
Employee options:
Risk free interest rate (4.66% to 4.80%)Weighted average 4.73%
Expected dividend yield
Expected life4.20 years
Expected volatility (30.36% to 37.90%)Weighted average 32.79%
Employee stock options granted1,581,040
Weighted average grant date fair value$5.17
Non-employee director options:
Risk free interest rate4.66%
Expected dividend yield
Expected life7.44 years
Expected volatility47.32%
Non-employee director stock options granted34,000
Weighted average grant date fair value$16.79
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2006, the weighted average fair values of the options granted under the Plans were calculated using the binomial method with the following assumptions:
Employee options:
Risk free interest rate (4.36% to 4.41%)Weighted average 4.39%
Expected dividend yield
Expected life4.20 years
Expected volatility (24.14% to 52.55%)Weighted average 33.12%
Employee stock options granted985,485
Weighted average grant date fair value$5.61
Executive option:
Risk free interest rate4.73%
Expected dividend yield
Expected life6.13 years
Expected volatility49.98%
Executive stock options granted70,000
Non-employee director options:
Risk free interest rate4.38%
Expected dividend yield
Expected life6.00 years
Expected volatility33.12%
Non-employee director stock options granted34,000
Weighted average grant date fair value$9.73
Tax benefits from stock option exercises of $560,000, $943,000 and $4.3 million, respectively, for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 were reflected as an outflow from operating activities and an inflow from financing activities in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.


69


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The option data above does not include the 554,102 stock options, with an approximate fair value of $6.1 million, assumed as part of the purchase price for the acquisition of Rent Rite Inc. in May of 2004. At December 31, 2005,2008, the weighted average remaining contractual life of the Rent-Rite options was 1.01 years. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the weighted average exercise price forwas $30.62. All of the Rent Rite options allwere exercisable as of December 31, 2008.
Note M —Deferred Compensation Plan
We have implemented theRent-A-Center, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”), an unfunded, nonqualified deferred compensation plan for a select group of our key management personnel and highly compensated employees. The Deferred Compensation Plan first became available to eligible employees in July 2007, with deferral elections taking effect as of August 3, 2007.
The Deferred Compensation Plan allows participants to defer up to 50% of their base compensation and up to 100% of any bonus compensation. Participants may invest the amounts deferred in measurement funds that are the same funds offered as the investment options in theRent-A-Center, Inc. 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan. We may make discretionary contributions to the Deferred Compensation Plan, which are exercisable, were 4.01subject to a five-year graded vesting schedule based on the participant’s years and $30.62, respectively. No options were issuedof service with us. We are obligated to non-employees during 2005, 2004 or 2003.
      On January 31, 2006,pay the Compensation Committeedeferred compensation amounts in the future in accordance with the terms of the BoardDeferred Compensation Plan. Assets and associated liabilities of Directorsthe Deferred Compensation Plan are included in prepaid and other assets and accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. The deferred compensation plan liability was approximately $564,000 and $208,000 as ofRent-A-Center approved the issuance of long-term incentive awards to certain key employees under the Plan. The awards were issued as equity awards which were separated into three distinct tranches, (i) 50% of which were issued in options to purchaseRent-A-Center’s common stock vesting ratably over a four year period, (ii) 25% of which were issued in restricted stock units which will vest upon the employee’s completion of three years of continuous employment with the Company from January December 31, 2006, (iii) 25% of which were issued in restricted stock units subject to performance-based vesting based upon the Company’s achievement of a specified three year earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation2008 and amortization (EBITDA). The Company does not expect this issuance under the Plan to have a significant impact on its results of operations or financial condition.
Note O — Employee Benefit Plan2007, respectively.
 Rent-A-Center sponsors
Note N —Employee Benefit Plan
We sponsor a defined contribution pension plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code for all employees who have completed at least three months of service. Employees may elect to contribute up to 50% of their eligible compensation on a pre-tax basis, subject to limitations.Rent-A-Center We may make discretionary matching contributions to the 401(k) plan. During 2005, 20042008, 2007 and 2003,Rent-A-Center2006, we made matching cash contributions of $4.4$5.3 million, $4.2$5.3 million, and $4.2$4.1 million, respectively, which represents 50% of the employees’ contributions to the 401(k) plan up to an amount not to exceed 4% of each employee’s respective compensation. Employees are permitted to elect to purchaseRent-A-Center our common stock as part of their 401(k) plan. As of December 31, 2005, 20042008, 2007 and 2003, 11.0%2006, 12.0%, 16.0%7.0%, and 19.0%15.0%, respectively, of the total plan assets consisted ofRent-A-Center’s our common stock.
Note P — Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Note O —Fair Value of Financial Instruments
      The Company’sOur financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, receivables, payables, senior debt, and subordinated notes payable. The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, receivables and payables approximates fair value at December 31, 20052008 and 2004,2007, because of the short maturities of these instruments. The Company’sOur senior debt is variable rate debt that re-prices frequently and entails no significant change in credit risk and, as a result, fair value approximates carrying value. The fair value of the subordinated notes payable is estimated based on discounted cash flow analysis using interest rates currently offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality.quality using unobservable inputs based on management’s own assumptions. At December 31, 2005,2008, the fair value

74


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
of the subordinated notes was $291.0$206.2 million, which is $9.0was $19.2 million below their carrying value of $225.4 million. At December 31, 2007, the fair value of the subordinated notes was $296.3 million, which was $3.7 million below their carrying value of $300.0 million.
Note Q — Stock Repurchase Plan
Note P —Stock Repurchase Plan
      On October 24, 2003,Rent-A-Center announced that itsOur Board of Directors hadhas authorized a common stock repurchase program, permittingRent-A-Center us to purchase, from time to time, in the open market and privately negotiated transactions, up to an aggregate of $100.0$500.0 million of itsRent-A-Center common stock. Over a period of time,Rent-A-Center’s Board of Directors increased the authorization for stock repurchases under its common stock repurchase program to $400.0 million. As of December 31, 2005,Rent-A-CenterWe had purchased a total of 14,426,00019,412,750 shares and 18,460,950 shares of its


70


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Rent-A-Center common stock for an aggregate of $356.1$457.8 million and $444.3 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, under this common stock repurchase program, of which 1,816,100program. We repurchased 801,800 shares were repurchasedfor $10.3 million in the fourth quarter of 20052008. A total of 951,800 shares were repurchased for approximately $34.5 million.
Note R — Earnings Per Common Share$13.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2008. A total of 3,832,150 shares were repurchased for $83.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2007.
 
Note Q —Earnings Per Common Share
Summarized basic and diluted earnings per common share were calculated as follows:
             
  Net Earnings Shares Per Share
       
  (In thousands, except per share data)
Year ended December 31, 2005
            
Basic earnings per common share $135,738   73,018  $1.86 
Effect of dilutive stock options     1,090     
          
Diluted earnings per common share $135,738   74,108  $1.83 
          
Year ended December 31, 2004
            
Basic earnings per common share $155,855   78,150  $1.99 
Effect of dilutive stock options     2,097     
          
Diluted earnings per common share $155,855   80,247  $1.94 
          
Year ended December 31, 2003
            
Basic earnings per common share $181,496   84,139  $2.16 
Effect of dilutive stock options     3,069     
          
Diluted earnings per common share $181,496   87,208  $2.08 
          
 
             
     Weighted Average
    
  Net Earnings  Shares  Per Share 
  (In thousands, except per share data) 
 
Year ended December 31, 2008
            
Basic earnings per common share $139,624   66,606  $2.10 
Effect of dilutive stock options     585     
             
Diluted earnings per common share $139,624   67,191  $2.08 
             
Year ended December 31, 2007
            
Basic earnings per common share $76,268   68,706  $1.11 
Effect of dilutive stock options     769     
             
Diluted earnings per common share $76,268   69,475  $1.10 
             
Year ended December 31, 2006
            
Basic earnings per common share $103,092   69,676  $1.48 
Effect of dilutive stock options     1,057     
             
Diluted earnings per common share $103,092   70,733  $1.46 
             
For 2005, 2004,2008, 2007, and 2003,2006, the number of stock options that were outstanding but not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share because their exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common stock and, therefore anti-dilutive, was 1,916,413, 942,9723,100,825, 2,813,529, and 66,250,1,616,822, respectively.


71

75


RENT-A-CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Note S — Unaudited Quarterly Data
Note R —Unaudited Quarterly Data
Summarized quarterly financial data for 2005, 20042008, 2007 and 20032006 is as follows:
                 
  1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter
         
  (In thousands, except per share data)
Year ended December 31, 2005
                
Revenues $601,809  $580,578  $573,507  $583,213 
Gross profit  433,545   428,372   421,499   426,276 
Operating profit  85,992   72,988   30,980(2)  59,811 
Net earnings  47,669(1)  41,742   11,277   35,050(3)
Basic earnings per common share $0.64  $0.56  $0.15  $0.50 
Diluted earnings per common share $0.63  $0.55  $0.15  $0.50 
Year ended December 31, 2004
                
Revenues $585,380  $572,985  $569,607  $585,283 
Gross profit  422,417   423,831   419,282   428,608 
Operating profit  92,659   90,223   24,344(4)  75,725 
Net earnings  52,209   51,194   5,573   46,879 
Basic earnings per common share $0.65  $0.64  $0.07  $0.63 
Diluted earnings per common share $0.63  $0.62  $0.07  $0.61 
Year ended December 31, 2003
                
Revenues $566,406  $553,260  $549,825  $558,659 
Gross profit  408,416   408,648   403,729   408,491 
Operating profit  96,291   97,238   87,502   88,991 
Net earnings  50,959   35,300   43,738   51,499 
Basic earnings per common share $0.58  $0.40  $0.54  $0.64 
Diluted earnings per common share $0.57  $0.39  $0.52  $0.62 
 
                 
  1st Quarter  2nd Quarter  3rd Quarter  4th Quarter 
  (In thousands, except per share data) 
 
Year ended December 31, 2008
                
Revenues $756,636  $719,031  $708,755  $699,750 
Gross profit  533,733   517,329   510,022   507,268 
Operating profit  77,540   74,434   58,549   63,865 
Net earnings  36,358   37,741   29,379   36,146 
Basic earnings per common share $0.55  $0.57  $0.44  $0.54 
Diluted earnings per common share $0.54  $0.56  $0.44  $0.54 
Year ended December 31, 2007
                
Revenues $755,299  $724,158  $709,701  $716,963 
Gross profit  553,168   538,491   518,523   519,420 
Operating profit  46,155   87,024   60,575   10,483 
Net earnings(loss)  15,103   41,251   25,275   (5,361)
Basic earnings(loss) per common share $0.21  $0.59  $0.37  $(0.08)
Diluted earnings(loss) per common share $0.21  $0.58  $0.37  $(0.08)
Year ended December 31, 2006
                
Revenues $606,975  $583,623  $587,184  $656,126 
Gross profit  436,099   430,509   432,365   480,837 
Operating profit  75,484   75,193   51,871   19,396 
Net earnings(loss)  40,328   39,843   25,241   (2,320)
Basic earnings(loss) per common share $0.58  $0.57  $0.36  $(0.03)
Diluted earnings(loss) per common share $0.57  $0.56  $0.36  $(0.03)


72


(1)Includes the effects of a pre-tax legal reversion of $8.0 million associated with the settlement of a class action lawsuit in the state of California and a $2.0 million tax audit reserve credit associated with the examination and favorable resolution of our 1998 and 1999 federal tax returns.
(2)Includes the effects of a $13.0 million pre-tax restructuring expense as part of our store consolidation plan and $7.7 million in pre-tax expenses related to the damage caused by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
(3)Includes the effects of a $2.1 million pre-tax restructuring expense as part of our store consolidation plan, $1.1 million in pre-tax expenses related to the damage caused by Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma and a $3.3 million state tax reserve credit for a reserve adjustment due to a change in estimate related to potential loss exposures.
(4)Includes the effects of a pre-tax legal settlement charge of $47.0 million associated with the settlement of a class action lawsuit in the state of California.

76


Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
 
None.
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.
An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in RuleRules 13a — 15(e) and 15d — 15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Based on this evaluation, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, concluded that, as of December 31, 2005,2008, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by usas defined in the reports we file or submitRules 13a — 15(e) and 15d — 15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.1934.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
Please refer to Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting on page 4644 of this report.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
For the quarter ended December 31, 2005,2008, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined inRule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B.Other Information.
      None.
PART III
Item 10.9B.Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.(*)Other Information.
None.
PART III
Item 11.10.Directors, Executive Compensation.Officers and Corporate Governance.(*)
Item 11.Executive Compensation.(*)
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.(*)
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.Transactions, and Director Independence.(*)
Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services.(*)
 
*The information required by Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 is or will be set forth in the definitive proxy statement relating to the 20062009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders ofRent-A-Center, Inc., which is to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This definitive proxy statement relates to a meeting of stockholders involving the election of directors and the portions therefrom required to be set forth in thisForm 10-K by Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 are incorporated herein by reference pursuant to General Instruction G(3) toForm 10-K.


73

77


PART IV
Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
Financial Statement Schedules
 
The financial statements included in this report are listed in the Index to Financial Statements on page 4341 of this report. Schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are either not required under the related instructions or inapplicable.
Exhibits
 
The exhibits required to be furnished pursuant to Item 15 are listed in the Exhibit Index filed herewith, which Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference.


74

78


SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned duly authorized.
Rent-A-Center, Inc.
RENT-A-CENTER, INC.
 By: 
/s/Robert D. Davis
Robert D. Davis
Senior Vice President — Finance,
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Robert D. Davis
Executive Vice President — Finance,
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Date: March 10, 2006February 27, 2009
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
       
Signature
 
Title
 
Date
/s/  Mark E. Speese

Mark E. Speese
Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
February 27, 2009
/s/  Mitchell E. Fadel

Mitchell E. Fadel
President, Chief Operating Officer and DirectorFebruary 27, 2009
/s/  Robert D. Davis

Robert D. Davis
Executive Vice President — Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
February 27, 2009
/s/  Michael J. Gade

Michael J. Gade
DirectorFebruary 27, 2009
/s/  Jeffery M. Jackson

Jeffery M. Jackson
DirectorFebruary 27, 2009
/s/  Kerney Laday

Kerney Laday
DirectorFebruary 27, 2009
/s/  J. V. Lentell

J. V. Lentell
DirectorFebruary 27, 2009
/s/  Leonard H. Roberts

Leonard H. Roberts
DirectorFebruary 27, 2009
/s/  Paula Stern

Paula Stern
DirectorFebruary 27, 2009


75


INDEX TO EXHIBITS
     
Exhibit No.
 
Description
 
 3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of Rent-A-Center, Inc., as amended (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated as of December 31, 2002.)
     
 3.2 Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of Rent-A-Center, Inc., dated May 19, 2004 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004.)
     
 3.3 Amended and Restated Bylaws of Rent-A-Center, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated as of December 11, 2008.)
     
 4.1 Form of Certificate evidencing Common Stock (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-4/A filed on January 13, 1999.)
     
 4.2 Indenture, dated as of May 6, 2003, by and among Rent-A-Center, Inc., as Issuer, Rent-A-Center East, Inc., ColorTyme, Inc., Rent-A-Center West, Inc., Get It Now, LLC, Rent-A-Center Texas, L.P. and Rent-A-Center Texas, L.L.C., as Guarantors, and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003.)
     
 4.3 First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 4, 2003, between Rent-A-Center, Inc., as Issuer, the Guarantors named therein, as Guarantors, and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2003.)
     
 4.4 Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 26, 2004, between Rent-A-Center, Inc., as Issuer, the Guarantors named therein, as Guarantors, and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004.)
     
 4.5 Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 7, 2004, between Rent-A-Center, Inc., as Issuer, the Guarantors named therein, as Guarantors, and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004.)
     
 4.6 Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 14, 2004, between Rent-A-Center, Inc., as Issuer, the Guarantors named therein, as Guarantors, and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004.)
     
 4.7 Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 30, 2005, between Rent-A-Center, Inc., as Issuer, the Guarantors named therein, as Guarantors, and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.10 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005.)
     
 4.8 Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 17, 2006, between Rent-A-Center, Inc., as Issuer, the Guarantors named therein, as Guarantors, and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.10 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006.)
     
 4.9 Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 17, 2006, between Rent-A-Center, Inc., as Issuer, the Guarantors named therein, as Guarantors, and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.11 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006.)
     
 4.10 Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 15, 2006, between Rent-A-Center, Inc., as Issuer, the Guarantors named therein, as Guarantors, and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.)
     
 10.1† Amended and Restated Rent-A-Center, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003.)


76


     
Exhibit No.
 
Description
 
     
 10.2 Amended and Restated Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of May 28, 2003, as amended and restated as of July 14, 2004, made by Rent-A-Center, Inc. and certain of its Subsidiaries in favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Administrative Agent (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 15, 2004.)
     
 10.3 Franchisee Financing Agreement, dated April 30, 2002, but effective as of June 28, 2002, by and between Texas Capital Bank, National Association, ColorTyme, Inc. and Rent-A-Center, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002.)
     
 10.4 Supplemental Letter Agreement to Franchisee Financing Agreement, dated May 26, 2003, by and between Texas Capital Bank, National Association, ColorTyme, Inc. and Rent-A-Center, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed July 11, 2003.)
     
 10.5 First Amendment to Franchisee Financing Agreement, dated August 30, 2005, by and among Texas Capital Bank, National Association, ColorTyme, Inc. and Rent-A-Center East, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005.)
     
 10.6 Amended and Restated Franchise Financing Agreement, dated October 1, 2003, by and among Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc., ColorTyme, Inc. and Rent-A-Center East, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003.)
     
 10.7 First Amendment to Amended and Restated Franchisee Financing Agreement, dated December 15, 2003, by and among Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc., ColorTyme, Inc. and Rent-A-Center East, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2003.)
     
 10.8 Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Franchisee Financing Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2004, by and among Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc., ColorTyme, Inc. and Rent-A-Center East, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004.)
     
 10.9 Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Franchisee Financing Agreement, dated as of September 29, 2006, by and among Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc., ColorTyme, Inc. and Rent-A-Center East, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006.)
     
 10.10 Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Franchisee Financing Agreement, dated as of December 19, 2006, by and among Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc., ColorTyme, Inc. and Rent-A-Center East, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.)
     
 10.11† Form of Stock Option Agreement issuable to Directors pursuant to the Amended and Restated Rent-A-Center, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.)
     
 10.12† Form of Stock Option Agreement issuable to management pursuant to the Amended and Restated Rent-A-Center, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.)
     
 10.13†* Summary of Director Compensation
     
 10.14† Form of Stock Compensation Agreement issuable to management pursuant to the Amended and Restated Rent-A-Center, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006.)
     
 10.15† Form of Long-Term Incentive Cash Award issuable to management pursuant to the Amended and Restated Rent-A-Center, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006.)

77


     
Exhibit No.
 
Description
 
     
 10.16† Form of Loyalty and Confidentiality Agreement entered into with management (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006.)
     
 10.17† Rent-A-Center, Inc. 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006.)
     
 10.18† Form of Stock Option Agreement issuable to management pursuant to the Rent-A-Center, Inc. 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006.)
     
 10.19† Form of Stock Compensation Agreement issuable to management pursuant to the Rent-A-Center, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.)
     
 10.20† Form of Long-Term Incentive Cash Award issuable to management pursuant to the Rent-A-Center, Inc. 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.)
     
 10.21† Rent-A-Center, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan and Amendment (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 4, 2007)
     
 10.22† Form of Stock Option Agreement issuable to management pursuant to the Rent-A-Center, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.)
     
 10.23† Form of Stock Compensation Agreement issuable to management pursuant to the Rent-A-Center, Inc. 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.)
     
 10.24† Form of Stock Option Agreement issuable to Directors pursuant to the Rent-A-Center, Inc. 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.)
     
 10.25†* Form of Deferred Stock Unit Award Agreement issuable to Directors pursuant to the Rent-A-Center, Inc. 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan
     
 10.26† Form of Executive Transition Agreement entered into with management (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006.)
     
 10.27† Employment Agreement, dated October 2, 2006, between Rent-A-Center, Inc. and Mark E. Speese (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006.)
     
 10.28† Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement, dated October 2, 2006, between Rent-A-Center, Inc. and Mark E. Speese (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006.)
     
 10.29† Rent-A-Center, Inc. Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007.)
     
 10.30†* Rent-A-Center, Inc. 401-K Plan
     
 10.31 Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 15, 2006, among Rent-A-Center, Inc., the several banks and other financial institutions or entities from time to time parties thereto, Union Bank of California, N.A., as documentation agent, Lehman Commercial Paper Inc., as syndication agent, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 15, 2006.)
     
 21.1* Subsidiaries of Rent-A-Center, Inc.
     
 23.1* Consent of Grant Thornton LLP

78


Exhibit No.
Description
     
 
/s/Mark E. Speese

31
.1*Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 implementing Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Mark E. Speese
 Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
 March 10, 2006
 
/s/Mitchell E. Fadel

Mitchell E. Fadel31
.2* President, Chief Operating Officer
and Director
March 10, 2006Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 implementing Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Robert D. Davis
 
/s/Robert D. Davis

32.1*Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Mark E. Speese
32.2*Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Robert D. DavisSenior Vice President — Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
March 10, 2006
/s/Richard K. Armey

Richard K. Armey
DirectorMarch 10, 2006
/s/Laurence M. Berg

Laurence M. Berg
DirectorMarch 10, 2006
/s/Mary Elizabeth Burton

Mary Elizabeth Burton
DirectorMarch 10, 2006
/s/Peter P. Copses

Peter P. Copses
DirectorMarch 10, 2006
/s/Michael J. Gade

Michael J. Gade
DirectorMarch 10, 2006
/s/J. V. Lentell

J. V. Lentell
DirectorMarch 10, 2006

79


INDEX TO EXHIBITS
     
Exhibit No. Description
   
 2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 27, 2004, by and between Rent-A-Center, Inc., RAC RR, Inc. and Rent Rite, Inc. d/b/a Rent Rite Rental Purchase (Pursuant to the rules of the SEC, the schedules and exhibits have been omitted. Upon the request of the SEC, Rent-A-Center, Inc. will supplementally supply such schedules and exhibits to the SEC.) (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.8 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004.)
 3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of Rent-A-Center, Inc., as amended (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated as of December 31, 2002.)
 3.2 Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of Rent-A-Center, Inc., dated May 19, 2004 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004.)
 3.3 Amended and Restated Bylaws of Rent-A-Center, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.(ii) to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated as of September 20, 2005.)
 4.1 Form of Certificate evidencing Common Stock (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-4/ A filed on January 13, 1999.)
 4.2 Certificate of Elimination of Series A Preferred Stock (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003.)
 4.3 Certificate of Designations, Preferences and relative Rights and Limitations of Series C Preferred Stock of Rent-A-Center, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed July 11, 2003.)
 4.4 Certificate of Elimination of Series C Preferred Stock (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.(i) to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated as of September 20, 2005.)
 4.5 Indenture, dated as of May 6, 2003, by and among Rent-A-Center, Inc., as Issuer, Rent-A-Center East, Inc., ColorTyme, Inc., Rent-A-Center West, Inc., Get It Now, LLC, Rent-A-Center Texas, L.P. and Rent-A-Center Texas, L.L.C., as Guarantors, and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003.)
 4.6 First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 4, 2003, between Rent-A-Center, Inc., as Issuer, the Guarantors named therein, as Guarantors, and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/ A for the year ended December 31, 2003.)
 4.7 Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 26, 2004, between Rent-A-Center, Inc., as Issuer, the Guarantors named therein, as Guarantors, and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004.)
 4.8 Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 7, 2004, between Rent-A-Center, Inc., as Issuer, the Guarantors named therein, as Guarantors, and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004.)
 4.9 Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 14, 2004, between Rent-A-Center, Inc., as Issuer, the Guarantors named therein, as Guarantors, and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004.)
 4.10 Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 30, 2005, between Rent-A-Center, Inc., as Issuer, the Guarantors named therein, as Guarantors, and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.10 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005.)
 4.11 Form of 2003 Exchange Note (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.11 to the registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed July 11, 2003.)

80


     
Exhibit No. Description
   
 10.1† Amended and Restated Rent-A-Center, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003.)
 10.2 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 28, 2003, as amended and restated as of July 14, 2004, among Rent-A-Center, Inc., the several lenders from time to time parties thereto, Calyon New York Branch, SunTrust Bank and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Documentation Agents, Lehman Commercial Paper Inc., as Syndication Agent, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Administrative Agent (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 15, 2004.)
 10.3 Amended and Restated Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of May 28, 2003, as amended and restated as of July 14, 2004, made by Rent-A-Center, Inc. and certain of its Subsidiaries in favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Administrative Agent (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 15, 2004.)
 10.4 Fifth Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement, dated as of August 13, 2004, by and among Apollo Investment Fund IV, L.P., Apollo Overseas Partners IV, L.P., Mark E. Speese, Rent-A-Center, Inc., and certain other persons (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3/ A filed on September 21, 2004.)
 10.5 Franchisee Financing Agreement, dated April 30, 2002, but effective as of June 28, 2002, by and between Texas Capital Bank, National Association, ColorTyme, Inc. and Rent-A-Center, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002.)
 10.6 Supplemental Letter Agreement to Franchisee Financing Agreement, dated May 26, 2003, by and between Texas Capital Bank, National Association, ColorTyme, Inc. and Rent-A-Center, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed July 11, 2003.)
 10.7 First Amendment to Franchisee Financing Agreement, dated August 30, 2005, by and among Texas Capital Bank, National Association, ColorTyme, Inc. and Rent-A-Center East, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005.)
 10.8 Amended and Restated Franchise Financing Agreement, dated October 1, 2003, by and among Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc., ColorTyme, Inc. and Rent-A-Center East, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003.)
 10.9 First Amendment to Amended and Restated Franchisee Financing Agreement, dated December 15, 2003, by and among Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc., ColorTyme, Inc. and Rent-A-Center East, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/ A for the year ended December 31, 2003.)
 10.10 Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Franchisee Financing Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2004, by and among Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc., ColorTyme, Inc. and Rent-A-Center East, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004.)
 10.11† Form of Stock Option Agreement issuable to Directors pursuant to the Amended and Restated Rent-A-Center, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.)
 10.12† Form of Stock Option Agreement issuable to management pursuant to the Amended and Restated Rent-A-Center, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.)
 10.13† Summary of Director Compensation (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.)
 10.14† Summary of Named Executive Officer Compensation (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 21, 2005.)

81


     
Exhibit No. Description
   
 10.15†* Form of Stock Compensation Agreement issuable to management pursuant to the Amended and Restated Rent-A-Center, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan
 10.16†* Form of Long-Term Incentive Cash Award issuable to management pursuant to the Amended and Restated Rent-A-Center, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan
 10.17†* Form of Loyalty and Confidentiality Agreement entered into with management
 21.1 Subsidiaries of Rent-A-Center, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 21.1 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005.)
 23.1* Consent from Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 31.1* Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 implementing Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Mark E. Speese
 31.2* Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 implementing Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Robert D. Davis
 32.1* Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Mark E. Speese
 32.2* Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Robert D. Davis
 
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
*Filed herewith.

79

82