UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
(Mark One)
   
þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20052006
or
   
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period fromto
Commission File No.file number 0-15327
CytRx Corporation
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
   
Delaware
58-1642740
(State or other jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) 58-1642740
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
   
11726 San Vicente Blvd, Suite 650,
Los Angeles, California
90049
(Address of principal executive offices) 90049
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(310) 826-5648

 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Title of each className of exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.001 par value per shareThe NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock Purchase Rights
Securities registered pursuantRegistered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $.001 par value per shareNone
     Indicate by check mark with the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer (as defined in Securities Act Rule 405). Yeso Noþ
     Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yeso Noþ
     Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo
     Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-Kþ
     Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.
Large accelerated filero      Accelerated filerþ      Non-accelerated fileroAccelerated fileroNon-accelerated filerþ
     Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 2b-2 of the Act). Yeso Noþ
     The aggregate market value of the Registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates on June 30, 20052006, the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $49,272,313.$86.4 million. On March 23, 2006,2007, there were 70,457,988outstanding 76,788,694 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, outstanding, exclusive of treasury shares.
 
 

 


 

CYTRX CORPORATION
2004
2006 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
     
ii
    Page
 1
1
16
26
26 
     
Business1
  27
27 
Risk Factors12
  30 
Properties23
  32 
Legal Proceedings23
  46 
 47
47 
     
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities24
  50
50 
Selected Financial Data24
  55 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations26
  70 
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk38
  71 
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data38
  
Controls and Procedures38

PART III
71 
     
Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant39
  72
 
Executive Compensation42
  
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters47
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions48
Principal Accountant Fees and Services48

PART IV
72 
     
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules49
  79 
Signatures57
 Exhibit 21.1EX-4.3
 Exhibit 23.1EX-21.1
 Exhibit 31.1EX-23.1
 Exhibit 31.2EX-31.1
 Exhibit 32.1EX-31.2
 Exhibit 32.2EX-32.1
EX-32.2
Exhibit Index located on page 50 of this report.
  i

i


“SAFE HARBOR” STATEMENT UNDER THE
PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
     From time to time, we make oral and written statements that may constitute “forward-looking statements” (rather than historical facts) as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 or by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, in its rules, regulations and releases, including Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We desire to take advantage of the “safe harbor” provisions in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 for forward-looking statements made from time to time, including, but not limited to, the forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report, on Form 10-K, as well as those made in our other filings with the SEC.
     All statements in this Annual Report, including inunder the captions “Business,” “Risk Factors,” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements for purposes of these provisions, including any projections of financial items, any statements of our current views with respect to the plansrecent developments regarding our RXi Pharmaceuticals Corporation subsidiary, our business strategy, business plan and objectives of management forresearch and development activities, our future operations, anyfinancial results, and other future events. These statements concerning proposed new products or services, anyinclude forward-looking statements regarding future economic conditions or performance,both with respect to us, specifically, and any statement of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing.biotechnology industry, in general. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “potential” or “could” or the negative thereof or other comparable terminology. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements contained herein and in documents incorporated by this Annual Report are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations or any of the forward-looking statements will prove to be correct, and actual results could differ materially from those projected or assumed in the forward-looking statements.
     Our future financial condition and results of operations, as well as anyAll forward-looking statements are subject toinvolve inherent risks and uncertainties, includingand there are or will be important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated in these statements. We believe that these factors include, but are not limited to, the riskthose factors set forth under the heading “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report under the captions “Business,” “Risk Factors,” and including“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” all of which you should review carefully. If one or more of these or other risks or uncertainties regarding the scope of the clinical testing thatmaterialize, or if our underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual results may be required by regulatory authorities forvary materially from what we anticipate. Please consider our molecular chaperone co-induction drug candidates, including with respect to arimoclomol for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS or Lou Gehrig’s disease), our HIV vaccine candidate and our other product candidates, and the outcomesforward-looking statements in light of those tests; uncertainties related to the early stage of our diabetes, obesity, cytomegalovirus, or CMV, and ALS research; the need for future clinical testing of any small molecules and products based on ribonucleic acid interference, or RNAi, that may be developed by us; the significant time and expense that will be incurred in developing any of the potential commercial applications for our small molecules or RNAi technology; risks or uncertainties related to our ability to obtain capital to fund our ongoing working capital needs, including capital required to fund the RNAi development activities to be conducted by our planned new subsidiary; and risks relating to the enforceability of any patents covering our products and to the possible infringement of third party patents by those products. All forward-looking statements and reasons why results may differ included inas you read this Annual Report are made as of the date hereof, and we assumeReport. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or review any such forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or reason why actual results might differ.otherwise.
  ii


PART I
Item 1.BusinessBUSINESS
     As used inIn this report, the terms “we,” “our,” “ours” and “us”Annual Report, we sometimes refer to CytRx Corporation a Delaware corporation,as “CytRx” and to our majority-owned subsidiary, RXi Pharmaceuticals Corporation, as “RXi.” References to the “company,” “we,” “us” or “our” refer to CytRx and RXi, unless the context suggests otherwise.
GeneralCYTRX CORPORATION
     We areCytRx is a biopharmaceutical research and development company engaged in developing human therapeutic products based in Los Angeles, California, with an obesity and type 2 diabetes research laboratory in Worcester, Massachusetts. We are in the process of developing products, primarily in the areas ofupon our small molecule therapeutics and ribonucleic acid interference, or RNAi, for the

1


human health care market. Ourmolecular “chaperone” co-induction technology. We recently completed a Phase IIa clinical trial of our lead small molecule therapeutics efforts include ourproduct candidate, arimoclomol, for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, which is commonly known as ALS or Lou Gehrig’s disease. We plan to initiate a Phase IIb trial of arimoclomol for this indication during the second half of 2007, subject to clearance by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. We also are pursuing clinical development of three oral drugour other small molecule product candidates, that we acquired in October 2004, including a Phase II trial initiated in September 2005, as well as our drug discovery operations conducted at our laboratory in Worcester, Massachusetts. Development work on RNAi, a relatively recent technology for silencing genes in living cells and organisms, is still at an early stage, and we are aware of only four clinical tests of therapeutic applications using RNAi that have yet been initiated by any party. In addition to our work in RNAi and small molecule therapeutics, we recently announced that a novel HIV DNA + protein vaccine exclusively licensed to us and developed by researchers at the University of Massachusetts Medical School, or UMMS, and Advanced BioScience Laboratories and funded bywith funding from the National Institutes of Health, demonstrated promising interim Phase I clinical trial results that indicate its potential to produce potent antibody responses with neutralizing activity against multiple HIV viral strains.Health. We have alsopreviously entered into strategic alliances with respect to the development of several other products using our other technologies.
     OnIn October 4, 2004, we acquired all of the clinical and pharmaceutical and related intellectual property assets of Biorex Research & Development, RT, ora Hungarian company which we refer to as Biorex. The Biorex a Hungary-based company focused on the developmentassets consist primarily of novel small molecules based on molecular “chaperone”chaperone co-induction technology, withwhich we believe may have broad therapeutic applications in neurology, type 2 diabetes, cardiology and diabetic complications. The acquiredOne of these assets include three oral, clinical stage drug candidates and a library of 500 small molecule drug candidates. We recently entered the clinical stage of drug development with the initiation of a Phase II clinical program with our lead small molecule product candidateis arimoclomol, for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS or Lou Gehrig’s disease). Arimoclomolwhich has received Orphan Drug and Fast Track designation from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
     The initial Phase II clinical trial that we have initiatedAdministration (FDA) and orphan medicinal product status from the European Commission for arimoclomol for ALS (which we refer to as the Phase IIa trial) is a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of approximately 80 ALS patients enrolled at ten clinical centers across the U.S. Patients enrolled in Phase IIa trial will receive either placebo (a capsule without drug), or one of three dose levels of arimoclomol capsules three times daily, for a period of 12 weeks. This treatment phase will be immediately followed by a one-month period without drug. The primary endpoints of this Phase IIa trial are safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints include a preliminary evaluation of efficacy using two widely accepted surrogate markers, the revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R), which is used to determine patients’ capacity and independence in 13 functional activities, and Vital Capacity (VC), an assessment of lung capacity. The trial is powered to monitor only extreme responses in these two categories. We recently announced initiation of an “open-label” (i.e.the medication is no longer blinded to the patients or their doctor) extension of this clinical trial. Patients who complete the Phase IIa study and who still meet the eligibility criteria may have the opportunity to take arimoclomol, at the highest investigative dose, for as long as an additional 6 months.
     Depending upon the results of the Phase IIa trial, we plan to initiate a subsequent Phase II trial (which we refer to as the Phase IIb trial) that will be powered to detect more subtle efficacy responses. Although this second trial is still in the planning stages and will be subject to FDA approval, it is expected to include approximately 300 ALS patients recruited from 25 clinical sites and will take approximately 18 months after initiation to complete.
     The acquisition of the molecular “chaperone” co-induction technology from Biorex represented a continuation of our business strategy, adopted subsequent to our merger with Global Genomics, in July 2002, to conduct further research and development efforts for our pre-merger adjuvant and co-polymer technologies, including Flocor and TranzFect, through strategic relationships with other pharmaceutical companies, and to focus our efforts on acquiring and developing new technologies and products to serve as the foundation for the future of the company.
     In April 2003, we acquired our first new technologies by entering into exclusive license agreements with UMMS covering potential applications for its proprietary RNAi technology in the treatment of specifiedALS. These assets also included two other oral, clinical stage drug candidates and a library of small molecule product candidates.
     We also are engaged in developing therapeutic products based upon ribonucleic acid interference, or RNAi, which has the potential to effectively treat a broad array of diseases by interfering with the expression of targeted disease-associated genes. In order to fully realize the potential value of our RNAi technologies, in January 2007 we transferred to RXi Pharmaceuticals Corporation, our majority-owned subsidiary, substantially all of our RNAi-related technologies and assets in exchange for equity in RXi. These consisted primarily of our licenses from UMMS and the identificationCarnegie Institution of Washington relating to fundamental RNAi technologies, as well as research and screeningother equipment situated at our Worcester, Massachusetts, laboratory. RXi will focus solely on developing and commercializing therapeutic products based upon RNAi technologies for the treatment of novel protein targets. In May 2003, we broadened our strategic alliancehuman diseases, with UMMS by acquiring an exclusive license from it covering a proprietary DNA-based HIV vaccine technology. In July 2004, we further expanded our strategic alliance with UMMS by entering into a collaboration and invention disclosure agreement with UMMS under which UMMS will disclose to us certain new technologies developed at UMMS over a three-year period pertaining to RNAi, diabetes, obesity,initial focus on neurodegenerative diseases, (including ALS) and CMV, and will give us an option, upon making a specified payment, to negotiate an exclusive worldwide license to the disclosed technologies on commercially reasonable terms. Approximately one year remains on the technology

2


disclosure option. As part of our strategic alliance with UMMS, we agreed to fund certain discovery and pre-clinical research at UMMS relating to the use of our technologies, licensed from UMMS, for the development of therapeutic products within certain fields.
          In conjunction with some of our work with UMMS, we operate a research and development laboratory in Worcester, Massachusetts whose goal is to develop small molecule and RNAi-based therapeutics for the prevention, treatment and cure of obesity and type 2 diabetes. This laboratory is focusing on using our proprietary RNAi gene silencing technology, combined with genomic and proteomic based drug discovery technologies, to accelerate the process of screening and identifying potential proprietary drug targets and pathways for these diseases. Through this laboratory, we are seeking to develop orally active drugs against promising targets and pathways relevant to obesity and type 2 diabetes.
          Although we intend to internally fund the early stage development work for certain product applications (including obesity,cancer, type 2 diabetes and ALS) and may seek to fund the completionobesity. See, “RXi Pharmaceuticals Corporation,” below for a description of the technologies, research and development activities and current business plan of certain of these product applications (such as arimoclomol for ALS), we may also seek to secure strategic alliances or license agreements with larger pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies to fund the early stage development work for other gene silencing product applications and for subsequent development of those potential products where we fund the early stage development work.RXi.
          Prior to 2003, our primary technologies consisted of Flocor, an intravenous agent for treatment of sickle cell disease and other acute vaso-occlusive disorders, and TranzFect, a delivery technology for DNA and conventional-based vaccines. In October 2003, we entered into a strategic relationship with another entity to complete the development of Flocor. Our TranzFect technology has been licensed to two companies. We have granted a third party an option to license our TranzFect technology for development as a potential DNA-based prostate cancer adjuvant and may also seek to license this technology as a potential conventional adjuvant for hepatitis C, human pappiloma virus, herpes simplex virus and other viral diseases. Adjuvants are agents added to a vaccine to increase its effectiveness. In addition, we may seek to license TranzFect for use as a non-clinical research reagent to increase transfectionin vitroor in laboratory animals. Flocor and TranzFect are further described under “Pre-Global Genomics Merger Technologies.”
          In addition, through our merger with Global Genomics, we acquired minority interests in two development-stage genomics companies, Blizzard and Psynomics. In 2003, we recorded a write-off of our investments in those companies. Our decision to record the write-off was based upon several factors. Those investments, and the write-off of those investments, are further described under “Genomics Investments.”
Molecular Chaperone Co-Induction Platform
     The synthesis of proteins is a normal part of every cell’s activity that is essential for life.human cell activity. Proteins are linear chains of building blocks known as amino acids. In order to function normally in a cell, these proteins must fold into particular three dimensionalthree-dimensional shapes. During stressful conditions (e.g.duringsuch as certain disease states),states, proteins can fold into inappropriate shapes that resultimproperly, resulting in aggregation of proteins, whichprotein that can be toxic to the cell. As an example, itIt is believed, for example, that mis-folding and aggregation of certain mutated forms of thea particular protein known as superoxide dismutase 1, (SOD1) proteinor SOD1, leads to the death of motor neurons that causes certain forms of ALS.
     In nature, the cell has developed molecular “chaperone” proteins to deal with these potentially toxic mis-folded proteins. Molecular chaperonesChaperones are a key component of athe human body’s universal cellular protection, maintenance and repair mechanism that helpsmechanism. They help to ensure that newly synthesized proteins are complete, taken to the correct positionsituated correctly within the cell’s structure and correctly folded. Molecular chaperones detect proteins that are mis-folded, and have the

1


ability to refold those proteins into the appropriate, non-toxic shape. However, ifIf the protein is so badly mis-folded that it cannot be repaired, the molecular chaperones also have the ability to “tag” the toxic protein for destruction by the cell. This tag, called ubiquitin, directs the mis-folded protein to a cellular apparatus called the proteasome, whose function is to degrade the protein into its constituent amino acids for recycling.recycling within the human body.

3


     A core element of the cell’s stress-management techniques is known as the heat shock response. Although this response was so-named because it was initially discovered by subjecting cells to heat stress, it is now known that the heat shock response is generally induced by a variety of physical and chemical stresses. As a cell comes under stress, proteins begin to mis-fold into toxic shapes. The heat shock response, (alsonow more commonly referred to as the stress response)response, increases the synthesis of molecular chaperones that then repair or degrade the mis-folded proteins.
     The stress response can be an important mechanism for cellular survival during certain acute physical stresses. For instance, prior induction of the stress response can protect tissue culture cells from heat-induced cell death. However, itIt appears, however, that the constant stress that occurs as a result of chronic disease dulls the stress response and erodes the effectiveness of the mechanism. For instance, although the stress response is slightly induced in the motor neurons of mice in an ALS model, the level of expression is apparently insufficient to repair the damage and the mice still die from the disease.
     We believe that by boosting the stress response to higher levels, the progression of chronic diseases likesuch as ALS canmay be slowed, halted or perhaps even reversed. In test tube experiments, mammalian cells engineered to have increased amounts of molecular chaperones are protected againsthave been shown to be resistant to a variety of otherwise lethal stresses. In animal studies, mice that have been genetically engineered to havemice with increased amounts of a molecular chaperone had improved heart function after an experimental heart attack. Increased molecular chaperone amounts also significantly increased the lifespan of mice with a disease similar to ALS, called spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy. We believe that these scientific studies give scientifically accepted support for newthe possibility that drugs likesuch as arimoclomol that aremay be capable of boosting the stress response.response in humans.
     Among the assets that we acquired from Biorex wereare several drug candidates whose mechanism of action is believed to be the “co-induction” of the stress response,response; meaning that they do not seem to activate the stress response by themselves, but instead they amplify the production of molecular chaperone proteins that are already activated by disease-induced cellular stress. Thesestress, but do not seem to activate the stress response by themselves. In doing so, the drug candidates thus may selectively amplify molecular chaperone proteins specifically in diseased tissue, which wouldmay minimize potential drug side-effects. TheIf confirmed, this amplification of thisthe cell’s own fundamental protective mechanism may have powerful therapeutic and prophylactic potential with the potential for an extremelyin a broad fieldarray of medical therapeutic utility.applications.
     We believe that our molecular chaperone co-induction drug candidates can potentially improve the cell’s natural capabilityability to resist the toxic effects of protein mis-folding caused by both acute and chronic diseases. Thus, theseThese orally available small molecule drug candidates may accomplish some of the same goals as RNAi as described below, but accomplish themwould do so by a mechanism of repairing or degrading the offending proteins, instead of degrading their corresponding messenger RNA, or mRNAs. Since the specificity for the recognition ofability to recognize mis-folded proteins is an intrinsic feature of the amplified molecular chaperones, it ismolecular chaperone therapy may not necessary to identifyrequire identifying the actual molecular target of the stress-induced damage. As a result, these drugproduct candidates may allowhave broader therapeutic utility for the removal of damaged proteins compared to that of RNAi.RNAi, which requires identifying the actual mis-folded proteins.
     We are not aware of otheranother pharmaceutical companiescompany engaged in developing small molecule co-inducers of molecular chaperones. At present,least a few potential drug candidates have been reported in scientific papers to activateas activating molecular chaperone expression, but these do not require pre-activation of thethey appear to activate stress response and therefore these drug candidates may simply represent a “stress”in all cells rather than to amplify the cell.
RNAi Platform Technology
          RNAi technology is a recently-discovered technologycell’s own protective mechanisms that uses short double-stranded RNA,are activated only in stressed or dsRNA, molecules to silence targeted genes and, as a result, is commonly referred to as “gene silencing.” RNAi has been shown to effectively silence targeted genes within living cells with great specificity and potency. As a result, RNAi technology is able to effectively silence targeted genes without impacting other, non-targeted, genes.
          RNA is a polymeric constituent of all living cells and many viruses, consisting of a long, usually single-stranded chain of alternating phosphate and ribose units with the bases adenine, guanine, cytosine, and uracil bonded to the ribose. The structure and base sequence of RNA are determinants of protein synthesis and the transmission of genetic information. RNAi is a technique of using short pieces of double-stranded RNA to precisely target thediseased cells.

42


messenger RNA, or mRNA, of a specific gene. The end result is the destruction of the specific mRNA, thus silencing that gene.
          RNAi is regarded as a significant advancement in gene silencing and was featured inScience magazine as the “Breakthrough of the Year” in 2002. Delivery of RNAi can be useful in laboratory cell culture experiments and in animals (including humans) to target specific mRNAs, thus reducing the levels of the corresponding specific protein product that is coded for by that RNA in the targeted cells. This allows the use of RNAi either as an effective drug discovery tool or potentially as a therapeutic product itself. We intend to develop RNAi technology as both a discovery tool to help identify classical, orally-available small molecule drugs and, potentially through the creation of a new subsidiary, for direct therapeutic applications when technically feasible. As a drug discovery tool, we use RNAi to identify and validate novel protein targets, which could then be used to discover small molecule therapeutics for the treatment and prevention of diseases such as obesity and type 2 diabetes. As a therapeutic, we are conducting pre-clinical RNAi efficacy studies to determine whether to proceed with human clinical trials using RNAi to silence specific genes that cause certain forms of ALS, CMV retinitis, and type 2 diabetes. In January 2004, Tariq Rana, a scientific authority in delivery and stability of RNAi, and in March 2004, Dr. Craig Mello, the co-discoverer of RNAi, each joined our Scientific Advisory Board and they act in an advisory capacity to help us develop RNAi therapeutics for specific diseases. We are currently pursuing a plan, subject to obtaining necessary funding, to transfer all of our RNAi therapeutics assets into a newly-formed subsidiary to accelerate the development and commercialization of drugs based on RNAi technology. In such event, the Company would continue to use its RNAi gene silencing technology as a drug discovery tool to facilitate its small molecule drug discovery program.
          In mammals and human cells, gene silencing can be triggered by dsRNA molecules present in the cell’s cytoplasm (the region inside the cell membrane but outside the cell nucleus). Specific enzymes (proteins) in the cell called dicer enzymes cut the dsRNA to form small interfering RNA, or siRNA. These siRNA are approximately 21 to 25 nucleotide long pieces of RNA. The siRNA then interact with other cellular proteins to form the RNA-induced silencing complex, or RISC, which causes the unwinding of the bound siRNA. This unwound strand of the siRNA can then act as a template to seek out and bind with the complementary target mRNA, which carries the coding, or instructions, from the cell nucleus DNA. These instructions determine which proteins the cell will produce. When the siRNA-loaded RISC binds with the corresponding mRNA, that “message” is degraded and the cell does not produce the specific protein that it encodes. Since the siRNA can be designed to specifically interact with a single gene through its mRNA, it can prevent the creation of a specific protein without affecting other genes.
          One reason for the potential of RNAi to be effective, where previous nucleic acid-based technologies have, to date, been unsuccessful, is that the cell already has in place all of the enzymes and proteins to effectively silence genes once the dsRNA is introduced into the cell. This is in direct contrast to the older technology of antisense, where there were no known proteins present in the cells to facilitate the recognition and binding of the antisense molecule to its corresponding mRNA.
          Another reason for the interest in RNAi is its potential to completely suppress or eliminate the viral replicon. A replicon is a DNA or RNA element that can act as a template to replicate itself. Once a virus is established in a cell, there are very few drugs that are effective in eliminating the virus. The RNAi process, however, has the potential of eliminating viral nucleic acids and, therefore, to cure certain viral diseases. Development work on RNAi is still at an early stage, and we are aware of only four clinical trials using RNAi, namely trials for age-related macular degeneration by Acuity Pharmaceuticals and Sirna Therapeutics, for respiratory syncytial virus by Alnylam Pharmaceuticals and for diabetic macular edema by Acuity Pharmaceuticals.
Product Development
     ALS Clinical Trials
     TheWe are pursuing directly and indirectly through RXi the development of therapeutics for the treatment of various forms of ALS is an area of significant interest for us.ALS. ALS is a debilitating disease. According to the ALS Survival Guide, 50% of ALS patients die within 18 months of diagnosis and 80% of ALS patients die within five years of diagnosis. According to the ALS Association, in the

5


United States, alone, approximately 30,000 people are living with ALS and nearly 6,000 new cases are diagnosed each year. Worldwide, approximately 120,000 people are living with ALS.
     We recently enteredcompleted the clinical stage of drug development in ALS with the initiation of ainitial Phase II clinical program withtrial, which we refer to as the Phase IIa trial, for arimoclomol for ALS. The Phase IIa trial was a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of approximately 80 ALS patients enrolled at ten clinical centers across the U.S. Patients received either a placebo in the form of a capsule without drug, or one of three dose levels of arimoclomol capsules three times daily for a period of 12 weeks, immediately followed by a one-month period without the drug. The primary endpoints of this Phase IIa trial were safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included a preliminary evaluation of efficacy using two widely accepted surrogate markers, the revised ALS Functional Rating Scale, or ALSFRS-R, which is used to determine patients’ capacity and independence in 13 functional activities, and Vital Capacity, or VC, an assessment of lung capacity. The trial was designed to monitor only extreme responses in these two categories. We have extended the initial Phase IIa trial on an “open-label” basis, meaning that the medication was no longer blinded to the patients or their doctors, in order to provide additional data regarding safety and tolerability. As a result, approximately 70 patients who completed the Phase IIa study and who met the eligibility criteria received arimoclomol at the highest investigative dose for up to an additional six months. We expect the results of this open-label extension to be available in the second quarter of 2007.
     We are encouraged by the results of our lead small molecule product candidaterecently completed Phase IIa clinical trial of arimoclomol for the treatment of ALS.ALS, which appeared to be safe and well tolerated by the patients in that trial even at the highest administered dose. Arimoclomol has received Orphan Drugalso was found to effectively enter the cerebral spinal fluid, demonstrating that it passed the “blood:brain barrier.” We plan to determine the highest dose that can be well tolerated in healthy volunteers in a multiple ascending dose study, and Fast Track designation from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The initial portion ofthen plan to initiate a subsequent Phase II trial, which we refer to as the Phase II clinical program was initiated in September 2005. We expect enrollment in this Phase IIaIIb trial, that will be designed to be complete shortly, and expect to announce results in the third quarter of 2006.
          In October 2003,detect more subtle efficacy responses. On February 5, 2007, we entered into sponsoredwith Pharmaceutical Research Associates, or PRA, a Master Agreement for Clinical Trials Management Services under which PRA will provide clinical research agreementsservices in connection with UMMSthe design, management and Massachusetts General Hospital, pursuantconduct of both the multiple ascending dose study and the Phase IIb clinical trial. Although the Phase IIb efficacy trial is still in the planning stages and will be subject to whichFDA clearance, at present we sponsored certain ALS research at those institutions utilizing our proprietary RNAi gene silencing technology targeted at the mutant SOD1 gene, which is the subject of the ALS technology we have licensed from UMMS. The mutant SOD1 gene is responsible for causing ALS in a subset of the 10% of allexpect it to include approximately 400 ALS patients who sufferrecruited from the familial, or genetic, form of the disease.
          Dr. Zuoshang Xu, an Associate Professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology at UMMS, is the principal investigator under our sponsored research30-35 clinical sites to take approximately 18 months after initiation to complete. Our agreement with UMMS, through which we have agreed to fund approximately $870,000 of research related to the development of an RNAi therapeutic targeting the mutant form of SOD1 that causes certain forms of ALS, of which $654,000 had been paid as of December 31, 2005. We anticipate that the development of this program will be continued by our planned RNAi subsidiary.
          Dr. Robert B. Brown, Jr., a Professor of Neurology at Harvard Medical School, Founder and Director of the Cecil B. Day Laboratory for Neuromuscular Research and a co-discoverer of the mutant SOD1 gene as a cause for certain ALS cases,PRA is the principal investigator under our sponsored research agreement with Massachusetts General Hospital. Under the agreement, we have funded approximately $556,000 of sponsored research at Massachusetts General Hospital to increase our basic understanding of certain aspects of the ALS disease process. In March 2004, Dr. Brown joined our Scientific Advisory Board and entered into a consulting agreement with us.
University of Massachusetts Medical School
          Through our strategic alliance with UMMS, we have acquired the rights to a portfolio of technologies, including the rights to use UMMS’s proprietary RNAi technology in the identification and screening of novel protein targets and as a potential therapeutic in certain defined areas that include obesity, type 2 diabetes, ALS and CMV, as well as a DNA-based HIV vaccine technology. In addition, we have entered into a collaboration and invention disclosure agreement with the UMMS under which UMMS will disclose to us certain new technologies developed at UMMS over a three-year period pertaining to RNAi, diabetes, obesity, neurodegenerative diseases (including ALS) and CMV and will give us an option, upon making a specified payment, to negotiate an exclusive worldwide license to the disclosed technologies on commercially reasonable terms. Approximately one year remains on the technology disclosure option.
          The HIV subunit vaccine technology that we have licensed from UMMS is based upon a unique mixture of pieces of human HIV-1 primary isolates from several genetic subtypes of HIV. These pieces, called HIV envelope proteins, are not sufficient for viral replication and therefore cannot lead to accidental infection by HIV. This polyvalent naked DNA (isolated, purified DNA) vaccine approach has the potential advantages of maintaining efficacy despite the high mutation rate of HIV, a broader immune response against divergent HIV-1 glycoproteins and the possible ability to neutralize a wide spectrum of HIV-1 viruses. UMMS has conducted animal studies of this vaccine, and UMMS and Advanced BioScience Laboratories, or ABL, which provides an adjuvant for use with the vaccine, received a $16 million grant from the NIH. This grant funded a Phase I clinical trial of a vaccine candidate using our licensed technology. We have previously announced that the vaccine candidate demonstrated very promising interim Phase I clinical trial results that indicate its ability to produce potent antibody responses with neutralizing activity against multiple HIV viral strains, and we expect to announce final results from the Phase I clinical trial in mid-2006. We have a commercial relationship with ABL which gives us the ownership of, and responsibility for, the further development of the vaccine and subsequent FDA registration following the completion of the Phase I trial. We do not have a commercial relationship with a company that is providing an adjuvant for the

6


HIV vaccine candidate in the current Phase I clinical trial. In any future clinical development of the vaccine candidate, we may be required either to license that adjuvant, or use a different adjuvant in conjunction with our HIV vaccine technology, in which case we may not be able to utilize some or all of the results of the currently planned trial as part of our business plan to pursue our product development efforts primarily by contract with clinical data for obtaining FDA approval of a vaccine.
          Our agreements with UMMS may require us to make significant expenditures to fund research at the institution relating to developing therapeutic products based on UMMS’s proprietary technologies that have been licensed to us. We estimate that the aggregate amount of these sponsored research expenditures under our current commitments will be approximately $842,000 for 2006, although a significant portion of those commitments may be assumed by our planned RNAi subsidiary. Our license agreements with UMMS require us to make payments of an aggregate of up to $94,000 per year to maintain all of our licenses, with such aggregate annual payments increasing to as much as $154,000 if we are not then conducting certain sponsored research at the institution. Our UMMS license agreements also provide, in certain cases, for milestone payments, from us to UMMS, based on the progress we make in the clinical developmentcompanies and marketing of products utilizing the technologies licensed from UMMS. In addition, our license agreements with UMMS require us to reimburse UMMS for legal expenses that they incur in prosecuting and maintaining of the related licenses patents. We estimate these legal expenses to be approximately $250,000 during 2006 and 2007. In the event that we were to successfully develop a product in each of the categories of obesity/type 2 diabetes, ALS, CMV and an HIV vaccine, under our licenses, those milestone payments could aggregate up to $16.1 million. Those milestone payments, however, could vary significantly based upon the milestones we achieve and the number of products we ultimately undertake to develop. In addition, our collaboration and invention disclosure agreement with UMMS requires us to make payments totaling up to $375,000 in 2006 in consideration for the option, upon making a specified payment, to negotiate an exclusive worldwide license to certain disclosed technologies.other third parties.
     Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes
     Obesity and type 2 diabetes are significantmajor health problems. The World Health Organization estimates that, on a worldwide basis, there are more than 300 million cases of obesity and 159 million cases of type 2 diabetes. According to the American Obesity Association, there are currently more than 60 million cases of obesity in the United States, and the American Diabetes Association reports that there are more than 16 million cases of type 2 diabetes in the United States. Scientists in our Worcester laboratory and scientists at UMMS, as part
     One of our strategic alliance, are focused on using cultured adipocytes (fat cells) as a model system for studying the regulation of gene expression involved in adipocyte differentiation and function. This research may lead to the identification of specific drug targets which regulate insulin signaling as well as other metabolic pathways regulating glucose and fatty acids. With this understanding, the program will focus on drug discovery of small molecule therapeutics and, potentially through a newly-created subsidiary, RNAi-based therapeutics for type 2 diabetes (e.g., drugs that act as insulin sensitizers and compounds that alleviate obesity). We believe that RNAi could potentially be a reliable method to selectively inhibit certain genes and their corresponding protein expression in adipocytes.
          In May 2004, we licensed from the technology transfer company of the Imperial College of Science, Technology & Medicine, the exclusive rights to intellectual property covering a drug screening method using RIP 140, which is a nuclear hormone co-repressor that is believed to regulate fat accumulation. This proprietary technology is covered by a pending patent application. We paid the licensor a license fee in the form of cash and shares of our common stock, and we will be required to make defined milestone and royalty payments based on sales of products developed using this technology. We believe this license provides us with an important potential drug target in the area of obesity and type 2 diabetes in conjunction with our RNAi gene silencing technology.
          In addition, one of the drugproduct candidates, acquired from Biorex, iroxanadine, was shown to be well tolerated in two Phase I and one Phase II clinical trials and demonstrated significant improvement of vascular function in the brachial artery of hypertensive patients.patients in Phase I and Phase II clinical trials conducted prior to our acquisition of iroxanadine. We planintend to evaluate the preclinical efficacy of this drugproduct candidate for two diabetic complications, that involve vascular dysfunction, retinopathy andincluding wound healing. If the drug this compound

3


proves to be efficacious in preclinical work, and the FDA agrees that it is appropriate to proceed with a Phase II clinical trial, we believe thatwould consider initiation of a Phase II clinical trial for eitherone of these indications could begin in 2007.indications.

7


     Although we initially intend to develop arimoclomol primarily for the treatment of ALS, the drugit also showed efficacy in preclinical animal models of diabetes. If efficacy greater than that of currently available medications is observed in additional preclinical models, we would also consider beginning a Phase II clinical trial for diabetes, in 2007, as arimoclomol has already been tested in two Phase I clinical trials.
     Research and Development LaboratoryStroke Recovery
     In addition toCytRx recently announced data indicating that arimoclomol improved functional recovery in experimental animal models of stroke. If, through additional preclinical testing, we confirm that arimoclomol improves functional recovery even significantly after the obesity and diabetes work being done under our sponsored research agreement with UMMS, our research andinitial stroke event, we would consider clinical development laboratory located in Worcester, Massachusetts is working to develop orally-active small-molecule and RNAi-based drugsof arimoclomol for the prevention and treatment of obesity and type 2 diabetes. Our business strategy is to use our portfolio of state of the art drug discovery technologies and our relationships with leading diabetes and obesity researchers to discover and develop first in class medicines to prevent and treat obesity and type 2 diabetes. Utilizing the RNAi target validation technology that we have licensed from UMMS, in combination with state of the art target identification methods, our research and development laboratory is focused on using a structure-based drug discovery approach to accelerate the process of screening and identifying potential proprietary drug targets and pathways for these diseases. Through our laboratory, we are seeking to develop orally-administered drugs that are based on promising targets and pathways that we may be able to identify.
          Through our license and sponsored research agreement with UMMS, we have secured rights to novel drug targets believed to be involved in obesity and type 2 diabetes. We will seek to validate these targets using the proprietary high throughput RNAi screening technology that we have licensed from UMMS and will apply state-of-the-art structure-based medicinal chemistry to develop small molecules and RNAi-based therapeutic products.stroke.
     Cardiovascular Disease
     Preclinical results by third parties with our drugproduct candidate, iroxanadine, indicate that it has therapeutic potential for the treatment of cardiovascular atherosclerosis. If iroxanadine proves to be effective in additional preclinical work, we plan to seek a strategic alliance with a larger company to support the subsequent clinical development for this indication.
Pre-Global Genomics Merger TechnologiesHIV
     TheOur HIV subunit vaccine technology licensed from UMMS is based upon a unique mixture of pieces of human HIV-1 primary isolates from several genetic subtypes of HIV. These pieces, called HIV envelope proteins, are not sufficient for viral replication and therefore cannot lead to accidental infection by HIV. This polyvalent naked DNA (isolated, purified DNA) vaccine approach has the potential advantages of maintaining efficacy despite the high mutation rate of HIV, a broader immune response against divergent HIV-1 glycoproteins and the possible ability to neutralize a wide spectrum of HIV-1 viruses. UMMS has conducted animal studies of this vaccine, and UMMS and Advanced BioScience Laboratories, or ABL, which provides an adjuvant, or agent to increase effectiveness, for use with the vaccine, received a $16 million grant from the NIH. This grant funded a Phase I clinical trial of a vaccine candidate using our licensed technology. We have previously announced that the vaccine candidate demonstrated promising Phase I clinical trial results that indicate its ability to produce potent antibody responses with neutralizing activity against multiple HIV viral strains, and we are continuing to analyze the Phase I results to determine how, or if, to proceed with clinical development. We have a commercial relationship with ABL which gives us the ownership of, and responsibility for, the further development of the vaccine and subsequent FDA registration following discussion describesthe completion of the Phase I trial. We do not have a commercial relationship with a company that is providing an adjuvant for the HIV vaccine candidate in the current Phase I clinical trial. In any future clinical development of the vaccine candidate, we may be required either to license that adjuvant, or use a different adjuvant in conjunction with our HIV vaccine technology, in which case we may not be able to utilize some or all of the results of the currently planned trial as part of our clinical data for obtaining FDA approval of a vaccine.
Other Technologies and Strategic Arrangements
     Our other primary scientific programstechnologies, which we acquired or developed prior to the acquisition of our mergermolecular chaperone technology, are CRL-5861, an intravenous agent for treatment of sickle cell disease and other acute vaso-occlusive disorders, and TranzFect, a delivery technology for DNA and conventional-based vaccines. In October 2003, we entered into a strategic relationship with Global Genomics on July 19, 2002,another entity to complete the development of CRL-5861. We have licensed our TranzFect technology to two other companies. We may also seek to license this technology as a potential conventional adjuvant for hepatitis C, human pappiloma virus, herpes simplex virus and the status of those programs today.other viral diseases or for use as a non-clinical research reagent to increase transfectionin vitroor in laboratory animals. Adjuvants are agents added to a vaccine to increase its effectiveness.

4


     Therapeutic Copolymer Program
     Before the Global Genomics merger, our primary focus was on CRL-5861 (purified poloxamer 188), which we also call Flocor. Flocor is an intravenous agent for the treatment of sickle cell disease and other acute vaso-occlusive disorders. Sickle cell disease is an inherited disease caused by a genetic mutation of hemoglobin in the blood, and acute vaso-occlusive disorders are a blockage of blood flow caused by deformed, or “sickled,” red blood cells which can cause intense pain in sickle cell disease patients. In June 2004, we licensed our copolymer technologies, including Flocor,CRL-5861, on an exclusive basis, to SynthRx, Inc., a Houston, Texas-based biopharmaceutical company. Ascompany, in exchange for a result of the SynthRx license, we received a 19.9%cash payment and and ownership interest in SynthRx and a cash payment from SynthRx of approximately $228,000, in return for our rights to the licensed technologies. In addition, uponSynthRx. Upon commercialization of any products developed under our alliance with SynthRx, we may also receive significant milestone payments and royalties. Prior to the change in our business strategy that led us to seek licensees for our Flocor technology, we had internally developed Flocor. In December 1999, we reported results from a Phase III clinical study of Flocor for treatment of acute sickle cell crisis. Although the study did not demonstrate statistical significance in the primary endpoint, or objective, of the study, statistically significant and clinically important benefits associated with Flocor were observed in certain subgroups. All amounts paid to us by SynthRx are non-refundable upon termination of the agreement and require no additional effort on our part.

8


     Vaccine Enhancement and Gene Therapy
     Gene therapy and gene-based vaccines are mediated through the delivery of DNA containing selected genes into cells by a process known as transfection. We refer to our gene delivery technology as TranzFect. A large majority of theThe limited revenues that we have generated over the past three years hasprior to 2006 have been due primarily to license fees paid to us with respect to our TranzFect technology, representingwhich represented 54%, and 93% and 81% of our total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2005 2004 and 2003,2004, respectively.
     Merck License
     In November 2000, we entered into an exclusive, worldwide license agreement with Merck & Co., Inc. wherebyunder which we granted Merck the right to use our TranzFect technology in DNA-based vaccines for HIV and three other targets. To date, Merck has focused its efforts on the HIV application, which is still at an early stage of clinical development, and, inIn July 2003, Merck notified us that it was returningreturned to us the rights to the three other targets covered by its license, which we are now able to license to other third parties. In November 2000, Merck paid us a signature payment of $2 million. In February 2002, we received an additional $1 million milestone fee related to the commencement of Merck’s first FDA Phase I study for a product incorporating TranzFect designed for the prevention and treatment of HIV. Merckhas completed a multi-center, blinded, placebo controlled Phase I trial of an HIV vaccine utilizing TranzFect as a component. Although the formulation of this tested vaccine was generally safe, well-tolerated and generated an immune response, the addition of TranzFect to the vaccine did not increase this immune response. Moreover, the DNA single-modality vaccine regimen with TranzFect, when tested in humans, yielded immune responses that were inferior to those obtained with the DNA vaccines in macaque monkeys. All amounts paid to us by Merck are non-refundable upon termination of the agreement and require no additional effort on our part.
     Vical License
     In December 2001, we entered intoWe are party to a license agreement with Vical Incorporated grantingunder which we grant to Vical exclusive, worldwide rights to use or sublicense our TranzFect poloxamer technology to enhance viral or non-viral delivery of polynucleotides, such as DNA and RNA, in all preventive and therapeutic human and animal health applications, except for (1) the four targets previously licensed by us to Merck, (2) DNA vaccines or therapeutics based on prostate-specific membrane antigen, or PSMA, and (3) sale of a non-regulated product for use as a non-clinical research reagent to increase transfectionin vitroor in laboratory animals. In addition, the Vical license permits Vical to use TranzFect poloxamer technology to enhance the delivery of proteins in prime-boost vaccine applications that involve the use of polynucleotides (short segments of DNA or RNA). Under the Vical license, we received a non-refundable up-front payment of $3,750,000, and, in addition to annual maintenance payments, we have the potentialare entitled to receive milestone and royalty payments in the future based on criteria described in the agreement. In each of April 2004 and January 2005, we received additional $100,000 milestone fees related to the commencement of Vical’s first FDA Phase I clinical trial for a product incorporating our TranzFect technology. All amounts paid to us by Vical are non-refundable upon termination of the agreement and require no additional effort on our part.
Genomics InvestmentsRXI PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION
     In connection withOur board of directors periodically reviews and assesses strategic alternatives for our merger with Global Genomics in July 2002, we acquired indirectly equity interests in two development-stage genomics companies, a 40% equity interest in Blizzardcompany and a 5% equity interest in Psynomics. In the fourth quarter of 2003, we decided that we would cease funding our investments in those genomics companies to focus on our core strategy of developing human therapeutics for large market indications. In May 2004, we determined that a write-off of those investments in the third quarter of 2003 should have been made. Our decision to record the write-off was based upon several factors, including Blizzard’s lack of success in raising a significant amount of the financing necessary for it to pursue the commercialization strategy for its products, current financial projections prepared by Blizzard, application of a discounted cash flow valuation model of Blizzard’s projected cash flows and the consideration of other qualitative factors. Based upon the quantitative and qualitative factors described above, in addition to others, wehas determined that the investmentbest strategy for realizing the potential value of our RNAi technologies was to create a subsidiary focused on RNAi therapeutics. RXi, our RNAi therapeutics subsidiary, was formed by CytRx and four leading RNAi researchers, including Craig C. Mello, Ph.D., who was awarded the 2006 Nobel Prize in Blizzard had no remaining value asMedicine for his co-discovery of September 30, 2003RNAi. To date, RXi’s principal activities have consisted of acquiring our RNAi-related assets, entering into four new RNAi technology licenses and thatan invention disclosure agreement with UMMS, developing research and clinical development plans for its RNAi therapeutic platform, assessing and negotiating licenses to additional theraputic RNAi technology, recruiting a write-off of this investment should have been made in the third quarter of 2003. It is ourRNAi-focused management and scientific/clinical advisory team and completing its organizational activities.

95


understandingRecent Developments
     We recently have entered into the following agreements relating to RXi:
Contribution Agreement
     On January 8, 2007, we entered into a Contribution Agreement with RXi under which we assigned and contributed to RXi substantially all of our RNAi-related technologies and assets. The assigned assets consisted primarily of our licenses from UMMS and from the Carnegie Institution of Washington relating to fundamental RNAi technologies, as well as equipment situated at our Worcester, Massachusetts, laboratory. The licensed technologies include patent applications on RNAi target sequences, chemical modifications and delivery to cells, field-specific licenses to a patent application on chemical modification of RNAi invented by Tariq M. Rana, Ph.D., the “Tuschl I” patent, and our exclusive licenses to patent applications that disclose gene targets for diabetes and obesity, including RIP140 (see, “Material Licenses and Other Agreements,” below). In connection with the contribution of the licenses and other assets, RXi assumed primary responsibility for all payments to UMMS and other obligations under the contributed licenses and assets (See footnote 4 to the table of contractual obligations at page 41).
Voting Agreement
     As part of our new business strategy, RXi began operating as a stand-alone company in January 2007 and is focused solely on developing and commercializing therapeutic products based upon RNAi technologies for the treatment of human diseases. In order to facilitate this strategy, and as an inducement to UMMS to enter the new licenses and the invention disclosure agreement with RXi described below under “Material Licenses and Other Agreements,” on January 10, 2007, we entered into a letter agreement with UMMS regarding the management of RXi. Under the letter agreement, we have agreed that, during the term of our new UMMS licenses, we will vote our shares of RXi common stock for the election of directors of RXi and take other actions to ensure that a majority of the RXi board of directors are independent of CytRx.
     Our letter agreement with UMMS will become effective only upon RXi’s achievement of a funding milestone in the coming few months. Following that time, if we own at any time a majority of the outstanding voting power of RXi, we have agreed in the letter agreement that we will reduce our ownership interest in RXi’s capital stock to less than a majority as soon as reasonably practicable. If it becomes necessary to reduce our ownership of RXi in order to comply with the letter agreement, we may seek to dispose of a portion of our RXi shares through a dividend or distribution of such shares to our stockholders, a sale or other disposition to one or more third parties, or other means, subject to compliance with SEC rules and other legal requirements and the requirements of the Delaware General Corporation Law. We have no commitment or agreement with respect to the possible disposition of any of our RXi shares.
Stockholder and Preemptive Rights Agreement
     On February 23, 2007, we entered into a letter agreement with RXi and the other current stockholders of RXi. Under the stockholders agreement, RXi has agreed to grant to CytRx preemptive rights to acquire any “new securities” (as defined) that RXi proposes to sell or issue so that we may maintain our percentage ownership of RXi. The preemptive rights will become effective if CytRx owns at any time less than 50% of the outstanding shares of RXi common stock, and will expire on January 8, 2012, or such earlier time at which CytRx owns less than 10% of the outstanding RXi common stock.
     Under the stockholders agreement, we also undertake to vote our shares of RXi stock in the election of directors of RXi and dispose of our RXi shares in accordance with the terms of our letter agreement with UMMS described above. We have further agreed in the stockholders agreement to approve of actions that may be adopted and recommended by RXi’s board of directors to facilitate any future financing of RXi.

6


Reimbursement Agreement
     As of January 8, 2007, we entered into a letter agreement with RXi under which RXi has agreed to reimburse us, following its initial funding, for all organizational and operational expenses incurred by us in connection with the end of 2003, Blizzard had ceasedformation, initial operations and funding of RXi. As of February 28, 2007, we have advanced approximately $592,000 to RXi for which it will be obligated to reimburse us.
RNAi Therapeutic Platform
     RNAi technology uses short double-stranded RNA, or dsRNA, molecules to silence targeted genes and, as a result, is commonly referred to as “gene silencing.” RNAi has been shown to effectively silence targeted genes within living cells with great specificity and potency. As a result, RNAi technology may effectively silence targeted genes without impacting other, non-targeted, genes. RNAi is regarded as a significant advancement in 2004, returnedgene silencing and was featured inScience magazine as the “Breakthrough of the Year” in 2002.
     RNA is a polymeric constituent of all living cells and many viruses, consisting of a long, usually single-stranded chain of alternating phosphate and ribose units with the bases adenine, guanine, cytosine, and uracil bonded to the ribose. The structure and base sequence of RNA are determinants of protein synthesis and the transmission of genetic information. RNAi is a technique of using short pieces of double-stranded RNA to precisely target the messenger RNA, or mRNA, of a specific gene. The end result is the destruction of the specific mRNA, thus silencing that gene.
     RNAi offers a novel approach to the drug development process that can target any one of the genes in the human genome. In contrast, only a small subset of the proteins encoded in the genome can be targeted by traditional medicinal chemistry or antibody based approaches. The specificity of RNAi is achieved via a well-understood biological mechanism based on matching the sequence of an RNAi to the sequence of the targeted gene. The specificity of RNAi may be sufficient to permit therapeutic targeting of only a single gene or even the mutant form of a gene. The ability to specifically target mutant forms of a gene is critical in many diseases, such as cancer and neurodegenerative disorders, where spontaneous or inherited changes in otherwise necessary genes are the underlying cause of disease.
     In mammals and human cells, gene silencing can be triggered by dsRNA molecules present in the cell’s cytoplasm (the region inside the cell membrane but outside the cell nucleus). Within the cell, dsRNA is thought to interact with other cellular proteins to form the RNA-induced silencing complex, or RISC, which causes the unwinding of the bound siRNA. This unwound strand of the siRNA can then act as a template to seek out and bind with the complementary target mRNA, which carries the coding, or instructions, from the cell nucleus DNA. These instructions determine which proteins the cell will produce. When the siRNA-loaded RISC binds with the corresponding mRNA, that “message” is degraded and the cell does not produce the specific protein that it encodes. Since the siRNA can be designed to specifically interact with a single gene through its licensedmRNA, it can prevent the creation of a specific protein.
     One reason for the potential of RNAi to be effective, where previous nucleic acid-based technologies have, to date, been unsuccessful, is that the cell already has in place all of the enzymes and proteins to effectively silence genes once the dsRNA is introduced into the cell. This is in direct contrast to the older technology of antisense, where there were no known proteins present in the cells to facilitate the recognition and binding of the antisense molecule to its corresponding mRNA.
     Another reason for the interest in RNAi is its potential to completely suppress or eliminate the viral replicon. A replicon is a DNA or RNA element that can act as a template to replicate itself. Once a virus is established in a cell, there are very few drugs that are effective in eliminating the virus. The RNAi process, however, has the potential of eliminating viral nucleic acids and, therefore, to cure certain viral diseases. Development work on RNAi is still at an early stage, and we are aware of only five clinical trials using RNAi, namely trials for age-related macular degeneration by Acuity Pharmaceuticals, Allergan Inc. and Quark

7


Biotech Inc., for respiratory syncytial virus by Alnylam Pharmaceuticals and for diabetic macular edema by Acuity Pharmaceuticals.
     RXi has determined that the initial indication that it plans to pursue is a form of ALS caused by a defect in the SOD1 gene. Early preclinical studies in a mouse model of SOD1 mediated ALS conducted by Dr. Tariq Rana of UMMS, one of RXi’s scientific founders and a member of our scientific advisory board and Dr. Zuoshang Xu of UMMS showed promising results using an RNAi therapeutic to inhibit the defective SOD1 gene. RXi’s second planned indication is the treatment of obesity and type 2 diabetes. RXi has in-licensed intellectual property regarding the RIP140 gene, which appears to the Minnesota Research Fund.
Researchbe an important regulator of metabolism, and Development Expendituresmay target this gene in future therapeutic product development programs.
     ExpendituresAlthough RXi’s near-term focus will be on ALS and type 2 diabetes, RXi plans to leverage its experience related to local delivery of RNAi therapeutics to seek to develop RNAi-based treatments for researchneurodegenerative diseases other than ALS. For example, in addition to ALS, many neurodegenerative diseases exist for which no effective therapies are available, including Alzheimers, Huntington’s and Parkinson’s diseases. In many of these cases, molecular targets have been identified that are difficult to access by conventional small molecule or antibody based approaches. RXi believes that the knowledge gained in its discovery and development activities were $9.1related to ALS will allow RXi to rapidly move into additional related therapeutic areas.
     RXi may also pursue preclinical studies in several additional disease areas, with the goal of creating multiple clinical development programs. For example, RXi founding scientist Greg Hannon, Ph.D. is a leader in the understanding of tumor-suppressor and oncogene pathways, and RXi expects that Dr. Hannon’s involvement with RXi will provide insight into potential cancer therapeutic targets. Many well-studied targets exist for numerous diseases that RXi believes will be difficult to target with normal medicinal chemistry. RXi will focus on combining its expertise in RNAi with existing disease models through collaborative interactions with academic, biotech and pharmaceutical industry scientists.
Material Licenses and Other Agreements
License Agreements
     Through our initial strategic alliance with UMMS that we initiated in 2003, we acquired the rights to a portfolio of technologies, including the rights to use UMMS’s proprietary RNAi technology as a potential therapeutic in certain defined areas that include obesity, type 2 diabetes, ALS and cytomegalovirus, or CMV, and in the identification and screening of novel protein targets. Pursuant to the Contribution Agreement that we entered into with RXi on January 8, 2007, we assigned those rights to RXi.
     In addition to the RNAi licenses and rights that we contributed to RXi, on January 10, 2007, RXi entered into three exclusive, worldwide, sublicenseable licenses with UMMS for three different patent families and one non-exclusive, worldwide, non-sublicensable license for a fourth patent family, which we refer to collectively as the “2007 UMMS licenses,” pursuant to which UMMS granted RXi rights under certain UMMS patent applications to make, use and sell products related to applications of RNAi technologies. The 2007 UMMS licenses include an exclusive license covering nanotransporters, which may be effective in the delivery of RNAi compounds, as well as methods and potential compounds for the potential treatment of ALS that can be delivered locally to the central nervous system.
     As consideration for the 2007 UMMS licenses, we paid UMMS an aggregate up-front fee of $75,000 and reimbursed UMMS $103,000 for previously incurred patent expenses. RXi also agreed under the 2007 UMMS licenses to undertake to complete an initial funding of RXi in the coming few months, and UMMS may terminate the 2007 UMMS licenses if RXi does not achieve that funding milestone in that timeframe. If we elect to provide RXi with all or a substantial portion of the initial funding, our current working capital will be depleted accordingly. Upon the completion of RXi’s initial funding, RXi will be obligated to pay UMMS an additional license fee of $175,000 and issue to UMMS an aggregate of $1,600,000 of RXi common stock that is to be valued on a per share basis for this purpose based on the valuation of RXi in its initial funding.

8


     The foregoing license agreements with UMMS require us to make aggregate payments of up to $300,000 in 2007. In subsequent periods, we will be required to make aggregate payments ranging from $250,000 to $1.7 million $9.0 million and $4.4 million duringper year to maintain the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Included in research and developmentlicenses through 2018. We are obligated to pay legal expenses for 2004 was $3.0 millionthe prosecution of in-process researchpatents licensed from UMMS, which we anticipate will be approximately $175,000 during 2007, and to make milestone payments to UMMS based upon our progress in the clinical development and marketing of products utilizing the technologies licensed from UMMS. In the event that was written offwe were to successfully develop a product in conjunctioneach of the categories of obesity/type 2 diabetes and ALS, these milestone payments could aggregate up to $27.4 million. We do not anticipate the occurrence of an event that would require a milestone payment during 2007. We also would be required to pay royalties to UMMS based on the net sales of those products. The actual milestone payments will vary, perhaps significantly, based upon the milestones we achieve and the products, if any, we develop.
New Invention Disclosure Agreement
     On January 10, 2007, RXi also entered into an invention disclosure agreement with our acquisitionUMMS pursuant to which UMMS is obligated for a three-year period to disclose to RXi any unrestricted inventions conceived or reduced to practice by UMMS related to therapeutic applications of assets from Biorex.RNAi technologies. Under the invention disclosure agreement, UMMS also grants to RXi an option to negotiate the terms of a license to any disclosed inventions. If RXi exercises the option and the parties are unable to reach agreement on the terms of any such license, RXi may elect to have an arbitrator determine the terms of the license. The invention disclosure agreement will become effective only upon RXi’s achievement of a funding milestone in the coming few months. Upon effectiveness, RXi will be obligated to pay UMMS $100,000 in cash and issue to UMMS $800,000 of RXi common stock that is to be valued on a per share basis for this purpose based on the valuation of RXi in the initial funding, and RXi will also be obligated to pay UMMS $100,000 on each of the first and second anniversaries of the effective date of the invention disclosure agreement. RXi also will be obligated to pay UMMS a fee each time RXi exercises its right to negotiate a license under the invention disclosure agreement. Once effective, the invention disclosure agreement will be terminable by either party upon an uncured breach by the other party and by RXi at any time for any reason.
Manufacturing
     CytRx Corporation
We do not have the facilities or expertiseno capability to manufacture any of the clinical or commercial supplies of any of our products, and rely on third-party contract manufacturers to produce materials needed for research and clinical trials, including our supplyclinical supplies of arimoclomol used for our clinical program.planned Phase IIb trial. To be successful,commercialized, our products and the productsalso must be capable of our partners must bebeing manufactured in commercial quantities in compliance with stringent regulatory requirements and at an acceptable cost. To date,We intend to rely on third-party manufacturers to produce commercial quantities of any products for which we are able to obtain marketing approval. We have not commercialized any products, norproduct, and so have wenot demonstrated that we can manufacture commercial quantitiesany of our product candidates can be manufactured in commercial quantities in accordance with regulatory requirements.requirements or at an acceptable cost.
     If weour product candidates cannot manufacture productsbe manufactured in suitable quantities and in accordance with regulatory standards, either on our own or through contracts with third parties, it may delay clinical trials, regulatory approvals and marketing efforts for such products.products may be delayed. Such delays could adversely affect our competitive position and our chances of achieving profitability. Wegenerating significant recurring revenues. If our products are not able to be manufactured at an acceptable cost, the commercial success of our products may be adversely affected.
RXi Pharmaceuticals Corporation
     RXi currently plans to manufacture its RNAi compounds through contract oligonucleotide manufacturers. The speciality oligonucleotide manufacturing companies with whom RXi’s management has previously worked offer research grade and GMP (Good Manufacturing Practices) grade RNAi for clinical use. However, if RXi’s product candidates cannot be sure that we can manufacture, either on our own or through contractsmanufactured in suitable quantities and in accordance with third parties,regulatory standards, RXi’s clinical trials, regulatory approvals and marketing efforts for such products may be

9


delayed. If RXi’s compounds and products are not able to be manufactured at aan acceptable cost, or in quantities, which are commercially viable. We currently rely and intend to continue to rely on third-party contract manufacturers to produce materials needed for research, clinical trials and, ultimately, for product commercialization.the commercial success of any products that it may develop could be adversely affected.
Patents and Proprietary Technology
CytRx Corporation
     We actively seek patent protection for our technologies, processes, uses, and ongoing improvements and consider our patents and other intellectual property to be critical to our business. We acquired patents and patent applications, and have filed several new patent applications, for a number of patents and have been granted patents related to technologies, primarily TranzFect and Flocor, we were developing prior to our 2002 merger with Global Genomics. Subsequent to the merger, we acquired patents in connection with our acquisition of intellectual property rights of Biorexmolecular chaperone program, and we have licensed additional technologies, covered byincluding patents or patent applications, most of which are in the RNAi field.
     As part of our development process, weWe regularly evaluate the patentability of new inventions and improvements developed by us or our collaborators. Whenevercollaborators, and, whenever appropriate, we will endeavor to file United States and international patent applications to protect these new inventions and improvements. However, weWe cannot be certain that any of the current pending patent applications we have filed or licensed, or any new patent applications we may file or license, will ever be issued in the United States or any other country. Even if issued, there can beThere also is no assurance that thoseany issued patents will be sufficiently broadeffective to prevent others from using our products or processes. Furthermore, ourIt is also possible that any patents issued to us, as well as those we have licensed or may license in the future, may be held invalid or unenforceable by a court, or third parties could obtain patents that we would need to either license or to design around, which we may be unable to do. Current and future competitors may have licensed or filed patent applications or received patents, and may acquire additional patents and proprietary rights relating to molecular chaperone co-induction and other small molecule technology, RNAi technology, DNA-based vaccines or other compounds, products or processes that may be competitive with ours.
     In addition to patent protection, we also attempt to protect our proprietary products, processes and other information by relying on trade secrets and non-disclosure agreements with our employees, consultants and certain other persons who have access to such products, processes and information. Under the agreements, all inventions conceived by employees are our exclusive property. Nevertheless,property, but there can beis no assurance that these agreements will afford significant protection against misappropriation or unauthorized disclosure of our trade secrets and confidential information.
RXi Pharmaceuticals Corporation
     RXi has secured exclusive and non-exclusive rights to develop RNAi therapeutics by licensing key RNAi technologies and patent rights. The patents, patent applications and exclusive rights to intellectual property rights are directed to key therapeutic targets, chemistry and configurations of RNAi and delivery of RNAi within the body in a therapeutically effective manner.
Intellectual Property Rights to Key Therapeutic Targets
     RXi’s portfolio of licenses from UMMS consist of certain inventions and technologies developed primarily by Drs. Craig Mello, Michael Czech and Tariq Rana directed to RXi’s key therapeutic areas. These areas are: genetic diseases involving a dominant mutation (such as ALS); disorders and diseases of metabolic control such as diabetes and obesity; and infectious agent related diseases such as disorders related to CMV.
     RXi has an exclusive license from UMMS to technology, patents and pending patent applications directed to the design and synthesis of chemically modified RNAi, andin vivomethods using RNAi to treat allele-specific genetic diseases such as ALS.
     RXi also has an exclusive license from UMMS to technology, patents and pending patent applications directed to RNAi that targets RIP140, a co-repressor of many nuclear receptors and a key factor involved in sugar uptake and oxidative metabolism, and consequently, diabetes and obesity. RXi is an exclusive licensee of UMMS’s technology establishing the key role of RIP140 in diabetes and insulin action. RXi is also entitled

10


to obtain first rights to cellular targets involved in diabetes and obesity as they are identified in Dr. Czech’s laboratory at UMMS. In addition, RXi has rights to technology, patents and pending patent applications directed to the use of the endoplasmic reticulum stress response pathway in adipose cells to enhance whole body insulin sensitivity.
     RNAi based therapeutics may be used to combat infectious diseases, especially viral diseases. RXi has exclusive rights from UMMS to technology, patents and pending patent applications directed to treatment of CMV-related disorders using RNAi.
Intellectual Property Rights to Chemistry and Configurations of Therapeutically Useful RNAi
     In addition to a non-exclusive license to Dr Andrew Fire’s and Dr. Mello’s foundational patent covering the use of dsRNA to induce gene silencing, RXi has secured exclusive and co-exclusive rights from UMMS to technologies, patents and pending patent applications related to fundamental technologies with the potential to produce stable and therapeutically effective RNAi therapeutics in the key areas of RXi’s business focus, which are ALS, diabetes, obesity, and conditions associated with CMV infection. These licensed technologies include:
Dr. Tariq Rana’s inventions regarding the fundamental rules of designing chemically-modified RNAi sequences that are suitable forin vivogene silencing;
Dr. Tuschl’s invention regarding RNAi therapeutics using double-stranded RNAs of 19 to 23 nucleotides; and
Drs. Mello and Zamore’s invention regardingin vivoproduction of siRNA.
Intellectual Property Rights to Delivery of RNAi to Cells
     RXi also has obtained exclusive and non-exclusive licenses to technologies potentially necessary for the efficient delivery of RNAi therapeutics to cellsin vitroandin vivo. These technologies include:
methods and compositions, including use of nanotransporters, for efficient RNAi delivery for therapeutic gene silencing in cells and animals; and
inhibition of gene expression in adipocytes using RNAi.
Competition
     Currently,CytRx Corporation
     We are aware of only one drug, Rilutek,®, which was developed by Aventis Pharma AG, is the only drug of which we are aware that has been approved by the FDA for the treatment of ALS.ALS, which is now available in generic form. Other companies are working to develop pharmaceuticals to treat ALS, including Aeolus Pharmaceuticals, Ono Pharmaceuticals, Trophos SA, FaustPharmaceuticals SA and Oxford BioMedica plc. In addition, ALS belongs to a family of diseases called neurodegenerative diseases, which includes Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and Huntington’s disease. Due to similarities between these diseases, a new treatment for one ailment potentially could be useful for treating others. There are many companies that are producing and developing drugs used to treat neurodegenerative diseases other than ALS, including Amgen, Inc., Cephalon, Inc., Ceregene, Inc., Elan Pharmaceuticals, plc, Forest Laboratories, Inc., H. Lundbeck A/S, Phytopharm plc, and Schwarz Pharma AG.
     The RNAi field, though at an early stage of development, is already a competitive one and the competition is expected to increase. We face competition on many fronts — ranging from large and small pharmaceutical, chemical and biotechnology companies to universities, government agencies and other public and private research organizations. Examples of companies that are focusing their commercial efforts in the RNAi field are Sirna Therapeutics, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Acuity Pharmaceuticals, Nastech Pharmaceutical Company Inc., Nucleonics, Inc. and Benitec Ltd. A number of the multinational pharmaceutical companies also either have their own gene silencing product development programs or are working with smaller biopharmaceutical companies in this area. In addition to our RNAi competitors, companies in other fields may be using other technologies to target the same diseases that we are targeting. The competition from other firms and institutions will manifest itself not only in our potential product markets but also, and importantly at this stage in development of RNAi technology, in recruiting and retaining key scientific and management personnel.
     Companies developing HIV vaccines that could compete with our HIV vaccine technology include Merck, VaxGen, Inc., AlphaVax, Inc. and Immunitor Corporation, and ABL may also seek to develop competing HIV vaccines that could utilize a portion of the technology that we have licensed from UMMS and ABL.

11


     With respect to both our RNAi and non-RNAi products, manyMany companies, including large pharmaceutical and biotechnology firms with financial resources, research and development staffs, and facilities that may in certain cases, be substantially greater than those of ours or our strategic partners or licensees, are engaged in the research and development of pharmaceutical products that could compete with our potential products. To the extent that we seek to acquire, through license or otherwise, existing or potential new products, we will be competing with numerous other companies, many of which will have substantially greater financial resources, large acquisition and research and development staffs that may give those companies a competitive advantage over us in identifying and evaluating these drug acquisition opportunities. Any products that we acquire will be competing with products marketed by companies that in many cases will have substantially greater marketing resources than we have. The industry is characterized by rapid technological advances and competitors may develop their products more rapidly and such products may be more effective than those currently under development or that may be developed in the future by our strategic partners or licensees. Competitive products for a number of the disease indications that we have targeted are currently being marketed by other parties, and additional competitive products are under development and may also include products currently under development that we are not aware of or products that may be developed in the future.
RXi Pharmaceuticals Corporation
     RXi faces significant competition in its research and development of RNAi-related pharmaceuticals. Competitors will include large and small pharmaceutical, chemical and biotechnology companies, as well as universities, government agencies, and other private and public research organizations who are focusing their efforts in the RNAi field or are developing pharmaceuticals for similar diseases as RXi is targeting through their research and development efforts.
     The RNAi field, though at an early stage of development, is already a competitive one and the competition is expected to increase. Companies that are focusing their commercial efforts in the RNAi field include: Merck & Co., Inc., through its recent acquisition of Sirna Therapeutics, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Quark, SR Pharma plc, Acuity Pharmaceuticals, Nastech Pharmaceutical Company Inc., Nucleonics, Inc., Tacere Therapeutics, Inc. and Benitec Ltd. A number of the multinational pharmaceutical companies also either have their own gene silencing product development programs or are working with smaller biopharmaceutical companies in this area. This competition from other firms and institutions will manifest itself not only in RXi’s potential product markets but also, and importantly at this stage in development of RNAi technology, in recruiting and retaining key scientific and management personnel and in obtaining rights to key intellectual property.
     RXi’s RNAi-focused competitors, as well as companies in other fields, may be targeting the same diseases as RXi. Competitive products for a number of the disease indications that RXi has targeted are currently being marketed by other parties, and additional competitive products are under development and may also include products currently under development that we are not aware of or products that may be developed in the future. With respect to ALS, Rilutek, which was developed by Aventis Pharma AG, is the only drug of which we are currently aware that has been approved by the FDA for the treatment of ALS. Other companies are working to develop pharmaceuticals to treat ALS, including CytRx (RXi’s parent company), Aeolus Pharmaceuticals, Ono Pharmaceuticals, Trophos SA, FaustPharmaceuticals SA and Oxford BioMedica plc. Also, since ALS belongs to a family of similar diseases called neurodegenerative disease, which includes Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and Huntington’s diseases, a new treatment for one ailment potentially could be useful for treating others. There are many companies that are producing and developing drugs used to treat neurodegenerative diseases other than ALS, including Amgen, Inc., Cephalon, Inc., Ceregene, Inc., Elan Pharmaceuticals, plc, Forest Laboratories, Inc., H. Lundbeck A/S, Phytopharm plc, and Schwarz Pharma AG.
     In addition, a number of products are currently being marketed by a variety of the multinational or other pharmaceutical companies for treating type 2 diabetes, including among others, the diabetes drug Avandia by GlaxoSmithKline PLC, Actos by Eli Lilly & Co., Glucophage and Junavia by Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Symlin and Byetta by Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Starlix by Novartis. For obesity, the drugs Acomplia by Sanofi-Aventis SA, Xenical by F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. and Meridia by Abbott

12


Laboratories are presently on the market. Many major pharmaceuticals companies are also seeking to develop new therapies for these disease indications.
     Competitors both in and outside of the RNAi field have financial resources, research and development staffs, and facilities that are, in most cases, substantially greater than those of RXi or its strategic partners or licensees and are engaged in the research and development of pharmaceutical products that could compete with our potential products. To the extent that RXi seeks to acquire, through license or otherwise, existing or potential new products, it will be competing with numerous other companies that may have a competitive advantage over RXi in identifying and evaluating these drug acquisition opportunities. Any products that RXi acquires will compete with products marketed by companies that, in many cases, will have substantially greater marketing resources than RXi has. The industry is characterized by rapid technological advances and competitors may develop their products more rapidly and such products may be more effective than those currently under development or that may be developed in the future by RXi’s strategic partners or licensees.
Government Regulation
     The United States and other developed countries extensively regulate the preclinical and clinical testing, manufacturing, labeling, storage, record-keeping, advertising, promotion, export, marketing and distribution of drugs and biologic products. The United States Food and Drug Administration, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the Public Health Service Act and other federal statutes and regulations, regulates pharmaceutical and biologic products.
     To obtain approval of our product candidates from the FDA, we must, among other requirements, submit data supporting safety and efficacy for the intended indication as well as detailed information on the manufacture and composition of the product candidate. In most cases, this will require extensive laboratory tests and preclinical and clinical trials. The collection of these data, as well as the preparation of applications for review by the FDA involve significant time and expense. The FDA also may require post-marketing testing to monitor the safety and efficacy of approved products or place conditions on any approvals that could restrict the therapeutic claims and commercial applications of these products. Regulatory authorities may withdraw product approvals if we fail to comply with regulatory standards or if we encounter problems at any time following initial marketing of pharmaceutical products requiresour products.
     The first stage of the FDA approval process for a new biologic or drug involves completion of preclinical studies and the submission of the results of these studies to the FDA. This data, together with proposed clinical protocols, manufacturing information, analytical data and other information submitted to the FDA, in an investigational new drug application (“IND”), must become effective before human clinical trials may commence. Preclinical studies generally involve FDA regulated laboratory evaluation of product characteristics and animal studies to assess the efficacy and safety of the product candidate.
     After the IND becomes effective, a company may commence human clinical trials. These are typically conducted in three sequential phases, but the phases may overlap. Phase I trials consist of testing of the product candidate in a small number of patients or healthy volunteers, primarily for safety at one or more doses. Phase II trials, in addition to safety, evaluate the efficacy of the product candidate in a patient population somewhat larger than Phase I trials. Phase III trials typically involve additional testing for safety and clinical efficacy in an expanded population at multiple test sites. A company must submit to the FDA a clinical protocol, accompanied by the approval of the Institutional Review Boards at the institutions participating in the trials, prior to commencement of each clinical trial.
     To obtain FDA and comparable regulatory authorities in foreign countries. The FDA has established guidelines and safety standards which applymarketing authorization, a company must submit to the pre-clinical evaluation,FDA the results of the preclinical and clinical testing, together with, among other things, detailed information on the manufacture and marketingcomposition of pharmaceutical products. The processthe product candidate, in the form of obtaining FDA approval for a new drug product generally takesapplication, or NDA, or, in the case of a biologic, a biologics license application, or BLA.
     The amount of time taken by the FDA for approval of an NDA or BLA will depend upon a number of years and involvesfactors, including whether the expenditureproduct candidate has received priority review, the quality of substantial resources. The steps required before such a product can be produced and marketed for human use in the United States include preclinical studies in animal models, the filing of an Investigational New Drug (IND) application, human clinical trials and the submission and approval of a New Drug Application (NDA) or a Biologics License Application (BLA). The NDA or BLA involves considerable data collection, verification and analysis, as well as the

1113


preparation of summariesstudies presented, the potential contribution that the compound will make in improving the treatment of the manufacturingdisease in question, and testing processes, preclinical studies, and clinical trials.the workload at the FDA.
     The FDA must approvemay, in some cases, confer upon an investigational product the status of a fast track product. A fast track product is defined as a new drug or biologic intended for the treatment of a serious or life-threatening condition that demonstrates the potential to address unmet medical needs for this condition. The FDA can base approval of an NDA or BLA for a fast track product on an effect on a surrogate endpoint, or on another endpoint that is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit. If a preliminary review of clinical data suggests that a fast track product may be effective, the FDA may initiate review of entire sections of a marketing application for a fast track product before the sponsor completes the application. The FDA has granted fast track designation and orphan drug may be marketed. There can be no assurance that we or our strategic alliance partners or licensees will be ablestatus to obtainarimoclomol for the required FDA approvals for anytreatment of our products.ALS.
     The manufacturing facilities and processes forWe anticipate that our products which we anticipate will be manufactured by our strategic partners, or licensees or other third parties,parties. Before approving a BLA, the FDA will be subject to rigorous regulation, includinginspect the need tofacilities at which the product is manufactured and will not approve the product unless the manufacturing facilities are in compliance with the FDA’s cGMP, which are regulations that govern the manufacture, holding and distribution of a product. Manufacturers of biologics also must comply with Federal Good Manufacturing Practice regulations.the FDA’s general biological product standards. Our manufacturers also will be subject to regulation under the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Environmental Protection Act, the Nuclear Energy and Radiation Control Act, the Toxic Substance Control Act and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. Following approval, the FDA periodically inspects drug and biologic manufacturing facilities to ensure continued compliance with the good manufacturing practices regulations. Our manufacturers will have to continue to comply with those requirements. Failure to comply with these requirements subjects the manufacturer to possible legal or regulatory action, such as suspension of manufacturing or recall or seizure of product. Adverse patient experiences with the product must be reported to the FDA and could result in the imposition of marketing restrictions through labeling changes or market removal. Product approvals may be withdrawn if compliance with regulatory requirements is not maintained or if problems concerning safety or efficacy of the product occur following approval.
     The labeling, advertising, promotion, marketing and distribution of a drug or biologic product also must be in compliance with FDA and Federal Trade Commission requirements which include, among others, standards and regulations for off-label promotion, industry sponsored scientific and educational activities, promotional activities involving the internet, and direct-to-consumer advertising. We also will be subject to a variety of federal, state and local regulations relating to the use, handling, storage and disposal of hazardous materials, including chemicals and radioactive and biological materials. In addition, we will be subject to various laws and regulations governing laboratory practices and the experimental use of animals. In each of these areas, as above, the FDA has broad regulatory and enforcement powers, including the ability to levy fines and civil penalties, suspend or delay issuance of product approvals, seize or recall products, and deny or withdraw approvals.
     We will also be subject to a variety of regulations governing clinical trials and sales of our products outside the United States. Whether or not FDA approval has been obtained, approval of a product candidate by the comparable regulatory authorities of foreign countries and regions must be obtained prior to the commencement of marketing the product in those countries. The approval process varies from one regulatory authority to another and the time may be longer or shorter than that required for FDA approval. In the European Union, Canada and Australia, regulatory requirements and approval processes are similar, in principle, to those in the United States.
Beneficial Ownership of RXi’s Securities
     As of March 23, 2007, RXi had outstanding 4,865 shares of common stock, of which 4,153 shares were owned by CytRx. The remaining 712 outstanding shares were owned by the current members of RXi’s scientific advisory board.
     Upon completion of its initial funding, RXi will be obligated to issue to UMMS a total of $2,400,000 of RXi common stock that is to be valued on a per share basis for this purpose based upon the valuation of RXi

14


in its initial funding. Since the value of RXi for purposes of the initial funding intends has not yet been established, it is not known how many shares UMMS will receive or what percentage of the outstanding shares those shares will represent. However, the stock issuance to UMMS will dilute the percentage ownership of RXi’s stockholders, including the shares CytRx owns.
Employees
     As of DecemberJanuary 31, 2005,2007, we had 2825 employees, 1814 of whom were engaged in research and development activities and 1011 of whom were involved in management and administrative operations. All
Available Information
     We maintain a website at www.cytrx.com and make available there, free of charge, our periodic reports filed with the SEC, as soon as is reasonably practicable after filing. The public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the full-time employees engaged in researchPublic Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains a website at http:/www.sec.gov that contains our reports, proxy and development activities hold Ph.D. degrees.information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. We post on our website our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.

15


Item 1A.Risk FactorsRISK FACTORS
     If any of the following risks actually occur, our business or prospects could be materially adversely affected. You should also refer to the other information in this Annual Report, including our financial statements and the related notes.
Risks Associated With Our Business
We Have Operated at a Loss and Will Likely Continue to Operate at a Loss For the Foreseeable Future
     We have incurredoperated at a loss due to our lack of significant losses over the past five years, including net losses of $15.1 million, $16.4 millionrecurring revenue and $17.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $121.3 million as of December 31, 2005. Our operating losses have been due primarily to oursubstantial expenditures for research and development on our products and for general and administrative expensesexpenses. We incurred net losses of $16.8 million, $15.1 million and our lack$16.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. We had an accumulated deficit of significant revenues.approximately $139.6 million as of December 31, 2006. We are likely to continue to incur operating losses unless and until, such time, if ever, that we are able to commercialize one or more of our products and generate significant recurring revenues. We anticipate it will take a minimum of three years (and possibly longer) for us to generate recurring revenues, since we expect that it will take at least that long before the development of any of our licensed or other current potential products is completed, marketing approvals are obtained from the FDA and commercial sales of any of these products can begin.revenue.
We Have No Source of Significant Recurring Revenues,Revenue, Which Makes Us Dependent on Financing to Sustain Our Operations
     Our revenues wererevenue was $2.1 million, $184,000 $428,000, and $94,000$428,000 during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, and 2003, respectively. Of the $2.1 million of revenues recognized in 2006, $1.8 million represented revenue recognized related to our sale to the ALS Charitable Remainder Trust of a one-percent royalty interest in worldwide sales of arimoclomol. We will not have other significant recurring operating revenuesrevenue until at least one of the following occurs:
  We are able to complete the development of and commercialize one or more of theour products that we are currently developing,in development, which may require us to first enter into license or other arrangements with third parties.
 
  One or more of our currently licensed products is commercialized by our licensees, thereby generating royalty incomerevenue for us.
 
  We are able to acquire products from third parties that are already being marketed or are approved for marketing.
     We expecthave relied primarily upon selling equity securities and upon proceeds received upon the exercise of options and warrants and, to incur lossesa much lesser extent, upon payments from our strategic partners and licensees, to generate funds needed to finance our business and operations. At December 31, 2006, we had cash and cash equivalents of $30.4 million, and as of March 23, 2007, we had received approximately $11.0 million in connection with the exercise of warrants and options since December 31, 2006. We believe that we have adequate financial resources to support our currently planned level of operations into the first quarter of 2009, which expectation is based in part on projected expenditures for 2007 of: $6.5 million for our Phase IIb trial for arimoclomol for ALS and related studies, $3.9 million for our other ongoing and planned preclinical programs, $8.8 million for general and administrative expenses, and $1.6 million to provide interim funding for RXi’s first few months of operations. We estimate RXi will expend approximately $6.2 million on development activities for 2007 (including approximately $400,000 in payments under agreements with UMMS, $3.2 million in other research and development expenses and $2.6 million in general and administrative expenses). If, in addition to the interim funding for which we have already budgeted, we elect to provide RXi with all or a substantial portion of its initial funding for 2007 and beyond in the coming few months, and if we are unable to raise funds in the future to replenish any amounts that we provide to RXi, our current working capital will be depleted accordingly. We anticipate it will take a minimum of three years and possibly longer for us to generate recurring revenue, and we will be dependent on obtaining future financing until such time, if ever, as we can generate significant recurring revenues. On March 7, 2006, we completed a private placement financing and received net proceeds of approximately $12.4 million. Although we believe that we have adequate financial resources to support our

12


currently planned level of operations into the third quarter of 2007, we will be dependent on obtaining financing from third parties in order to maintain our operations, including our Phase II clinical program with arimoclomol for ALS, our planned levels of operations for our obesity and type 2 diabetes laboratory, our planned RNAi subsidiary and our ongoing research and development efforts related to our other small molecule drug candidates, and in order to continue to meet our obligations to UMMS.
revenue. We have no commitments from third parties to provide us with any additional debt or equityfuture financing, and may not be able to obtain future financing on

16


favorable terms, or at all. A lack of needed financing wouldmight force us to reduce the scope of or terminate, our operations, or to seek to mergelong-term business plans.
Our Current Financial Resources May Be Diminished If We Elect To Provide RXi with or to be acquired by another company. There can be no assurance that we would be able to identify an appropriate company to merge with or be acquired by or that we could consummate such a transaction on terms that would be attractive to our stockholders or at all.
Most of Our Revenues Have Been Generated by License Fees for TranzFect, Which May Not be a Recurring Source of Revenue for UsInitial Financing
     License fees paidIn order to usretain the 2007 UMMS licenses and effectuate the new UMMS invention disclosure agreement, RXi is required to obtain significant funding in the coming few months. If we elect to provide RXi with respect toall or a substantial portion of the initial funding, our TranzFect technology have represented 54%, 93%current working capital will be depleted accordingly. As of March 23, 2007, we had received approximately $11.0 million in connection with the exercise of outstanding options and 81% of our total revenues for the years endedwarrants since December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. We have already licensed most of the potential applications for this technology, and2006, but there can beis no assurance that we will receive similar amounts from future exercises of options and warrants or be able to generate additional license fee revenues fromraise funds in the future to replenish any new licensees for this technology. Our current licensees for TranzFect, Merck,amounts that we provide to RXi. Failure to raise funds to replenish our funding or RXi could materially and Vical, may be requiredadversely affect our ability to make further milestone payments to us under their licenses based on their futurecontinue the development of products using TranzFect. Since TranzFect is to be used as a component in vaccines, we do not need to seek FDA approval, but any vaccine manufacturer will need to seek FDA approval for the final vaccine formulation containing TranzFect. Merck has completed a multi-center, blinded, placebo controlled Phase I trial of an HIV vaccine utilizing TranzFect as a component. In the Merck trials, although the formulation of the tested vaccine using TranzFect was generally safe, well-tolerated and generated an immune response, the addition of TranzFect to the vaccine did not increase this immune response. Moreover, the DNA single-modality vaccine regimen with TranzFect, when tested in humans, yielded immune responses that were inferior to those obtained with the DNA vaccines in macaque monkeys. Accordingly, there is likely to be a substantial period of time, if ever, before we receive any further significant payments from Merck or Vical under their TranzFect licenses.our other technologies.
We Have Changed Our Business Strategy, Which Will Require Us, in Certain Cases, to Find and RelyBe Reliant Upon Third Parties for the Development and Eventual Marketing of Our Products and to Provide Us With Products
     Following our merger with Global Genomics, we modified ourOur business strategy of internally developing Flocor and the other, then-current, potential products that we had not yet licensed to third parties. Instead, we began to seekplan is to enter into strategic alliances, license agreements or other collaborative arrangements with other pharmaceutical companies that would provide forunder which those companies towill be responsible for the commercial development and eventual marketing of thoseour products. In June 2004, we licensed Flocor, the primary potential product that we held prior to the Global Genomics merger and which we had not already licensed to a third party, to SynthRx, Inc., a recently formed Houston, Texas-based biopharmaceutical company, under a strategic alliance that we entered into with that company in October 2003. Although we intendplan to internally fund or carry out a significant portioncontinue the development of arimoclomol for the researchtreatment of ALS and development related to at least one of our small molecule drug candidates, andmay market it ourselves if it is approved by the early stage development work for certain product applications based on the RNAi and other technologies that we licensed from UMMS, and we may seek to fund all of the later stage development work for our potential ALS products,FDA, the completion of the development of our current product candidates, as well as the manufacture and marketing of these products, iswill likely to require in many cases, that weus to enter into strategic alliances, license agreements or other collaborative arrangements with largerother pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies for this purpose.companies.
     There can be no assurance that any of our products will have sufficient potential commercial value to enable us to secure strategic alliances, license agreements or other collaborative arrangements with suitable companies on attractive terms, or at all. If we are unable to enter into collaborative agreements,such arrangements, we may not have the financial or other resources to continue development of a particular product orcomplete the development of any of our products. In connectionWe do not have a commercial relationship with the recently-completedcompany that provided an adjuvant for the vaccine for the Phase I clinical trial conducted by UMMS and Advanced BioScience Laboratories on an HIV vaccine candidate that utilizes a technology that we licensed from UMMS, we do not have a

13


commercial relationship with the company that provided an adjuvant for the vaccine for the trial.UMMS. If we are not able to enter into an agreement with this company on terms favorable to us or at all,such a relationship, we may be unable to use some or all of the results of the clinical trial as part of our clinical data for obtaining FDA approval of this vaccine, which will delay the development of the vaccine.
     If we enter into these collaborative arrangements, we will be dependent upon the timeliness and effectiveness of the development and marketing efforts of our contractual partners. If these companies do not allocate sufficient personnel and resources to these efforts or encounter difficulties in complying with applicable FDA and other regulatory (including FDA) requirements, the timing of receipt or amount of revenuesrevenue from these arrangements may be materially and adversely affected. By entering into these arrangements rather than completing the development and then marketing these products on our own, we may suffer a reduction in the ultimate overall profitability for us of these products. In addition, if we are unable to enter into these arrangements for a particular product, we may be required to either sell our rights in the product to a third party or abandon it unless we are able to raise sufficient capital to fund the substantial expenditures necessary for development and marketing of the product.
     We may also seekWill Incur Substantial Expenses and May Be Required to acquire products from third parties that already are being marketed or have previously been marketed. We have not yet identified any of these products. Even if we do identify such products, it may be difficult for usPay Substantial Milestone Payments Relating to acquire them with our limited financial resources and, if we acquire products using our securities as currency, we may incur substantial shareholder dilution. We do not have any prior experience in acquiring or marketing products and may need to find third parties to market these products for us. We may also seek to acquire products through a merger with one or more companies that own such products. In any such merger, the owners of our merger partner could be issued or hold a substantial, or even controlling, amount of stock in our company or, in the event that the other company is the surviving company, in that other company.
Our Current Financial Resources May Limit Our Ability to Execute Certain Strategic InitiativesProduct Development Efforts
     In June 2004, we licensed Flocor to SynthRx, which will be responsible for developing potential product applications for Flocor. Although we are not doing any further development work on TranzFect or Flocor, should our three principal licensees for those technologies successfully meet the defined milestones, we could receive future milestone payments and, should any of the licensees commercialize products based upon our technology, future royalty payments. However, there can be no assuranceWe estimate that our licensees will continue to develop or ever commercialize any products that are based on our Flocor or our TranzFect technology.
          Our strategic alliance with UMMSplanned Phase IIb trial of arimoclomol for the treatment of ALS and related activities will require us to make significant expenditures to fund research at UMMS relating toincur approximately $26.8 million (including amounts payable under the development of therapeutic products based on UMMS’s technologies thatMaster Agreement for Clinical Trials Management Services we have licensed and pursuant to our collaboration and invention disclosure agreemententered into with UMMS. We estimate thatPharmaceutical Research Associates) over the aggregate amount of these expenditures under our current commitments will be approximately $1,186,000 million for 2006 and approximately $450,000 for 2007. Our license agreements with UMMS also provide, in certain cases, for milestone payments based on the progress we make in the clinical development and marketing of products utilizing the licensed technologies. In the event that we were to successfully develop a product in each of the categories of obesity/type 2 diabetes, ALS, CMV and an HIV vaccine, under our licenses, those milestone payments could aggregate up to $16.1 million.
          We estimate that the Phase II clinical program with arimoclomol for ALS, including the recently-initiated Phase IIa trial and the Phase IIb trial that we expect to initiate soon after completion of the present Phase IIa trial subject to FDA approval, will require us to expend approximately $17.8 million over a period of 24 to 30 months.months beginning December 2006, assuming we receive FDA clearance for this trial. In addition, the agreement pursuant toby which we acquired the clinical and pharmaceutical assets of Biorex our molecular chaperone co-induction drug candidates

17


provides for milestone payments based on the occurrence of certain regulatory filings and approvals related to the acquired products. In the event that we successfully develop any of thethose products, acquired from Biorex, thethese milestone payments could aggregate up to $4.2 million. Eachas much as $3.7 million, with the most significant of the foregoing milestonethose payments however, could vary significantly baseddue upon the milestones we achievefirst commercialization of any of those products. The actual costs of our planned Phase IIb trial could significantly exceed the expected amount due to a variety of factors associated with the conduct of clinical trials, including those described in the Risk Factor section below under “If Our Products Are Not Successfully Developed and Approved by the number of products we ultimately undertakeFDA, We May Be Forced to develop.Reduce or Curtail Our Operations.”
     Under our license for our HIV vaccine candidate, following the completion of the current Phase I trial, we will beare responsible for all of the costs for any subsequent clinical trials for this vaccine. The costs of subsequent trials for

14


the HIV vaccine, willif initiated, would be very substantial. Although we are seeking NIHNational Institutes of Health or other governmental funding for these future trials, we do not have, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to secure any such fundingfunding. We also will be responsible for any of these trials.
          The expenditures potentially required under our agreements with UMMS and ABL, together withmilestone payments based upon the operating capital requirements of our obesity and type 2 diabetes laboratory, our planned sponsored research funding for Massachusetts General Hospital, our Phase II clinical program with arimoclomol for ALS and our development of our small molecule drug candidates, substantially exceed our current financial resources. Although we raised approximately $12.4 million in March 2006, net of transaction expenses, those required expenditures will nonetheless require us to raise additional capital or to secure a licensee or strategic partner in order to maintain our operations, including our Phase II clinical program with arimoclomol for ALS, our planned levels of operations for our obesity and type 2 diabetes laboratory, our planned RNAi subsidiary and our ongoing research and development efforts related to our other small molecule drug candidates, and in order to continue to meet our obligations to UMMS. If we are unable to meet our various financial obligations under license agreements with UMMS, we could lose all of our rights under those agreements. If we were to have inadequate financial resources at that time, we also could be forced to reduce the level of, or discontinue, operations at our laboratory.vaccine.
If Our Products Are Not Successfully Developed and Approved by the FDA, We May Be Forced to Reduce or TerminateCurtail Our Operations
     All of our products are at various stages ofin development and must be approved by the FDA or similar foreign governmental agencies before they can be marketed. The process for obtaining FDA approval is both time-consuming and costly, with no certainty of a successful outcome. This process typically includes the conduct of extensive pre-clinical and clinical testing, which may take longer or cost more than we or our licensees anticipate, and may prove unsuccessful due to numerous factors. Product candidates that may appear to be promising at early stages of development may not successfully reach the market for a number of reasons. The results of preclinical and initial clinical testing of these products may not necessarily indicate the results that will be obtained from later or more extensive testing. Companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials, even after obtaining promising results in earlier trials.
     Numerous factors could affect the timing, cost or outcome of our drug development efforts, including the following:
  Difficulty in securing centers to conduct trials.
 
  Difficulty in enrolling patients in conformity with required protocols or projected timelines.
 
  Unexpected adverse reactions by patients in trials.
 
  Difficulty in obtaining clinical supplies of the product.
 
  Changes in the FDA’s requirements for our testing during the course of that testing.
 
  Inability to generate statistically significant data confirming the efficacy of the product being tested.
 
  Modification of the drug during testing.
 
  Reallocation of our limited financial and other resources to other clinical programs.
     It is possible that none of the products we develop will obtain the appropriate regulatory approvals necessary for us to begin selling them. The time required to obtain FDA and other approvals is unpredictable but often can take years following the commencement of clinical trials, depending upon the complexity of the drug candidate. Any analysis we perform of data from clinical activities is subject to confirmation and interpretation by regulatory authorities, which could delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval. Any delay or failure in obtaining required

1518


failure in obtaining required approvals could have a material adverse effect on our ability to generate revenuesrevenue from the particular drug candidate and we may not have the financial resources to continue to develop our products and may have to terminate our operations.
The Approach We Are Taking to Discover and Develop Novel Therapeutics Using RNAi is Unproven and May Never Lead to Marketable Productscandidate.
     The RNAi technologies that we have acquired from UMMS have not yet been clinically tested by us, nor are we aware of any clinical trials having been completed by third parties involving similar technologies. Neither we nor any other company has received regulatory approval to market therapeutics utilizing RNAi. The scientific discoveries that form the basis for our efforts to discover and develop new drugs are relatively new. The scientific evidence to support the feasibility of developing drugs based on these discoveries is both preliminary and limited. Successful development of RNAi-based products will require solving a number of issues, including providing suitable methods of stabilizing the RNAi drug material and delivering it into target cells in the human body. We may spend large amounts of money trying to solve these issues, and never succeed in doing so. In addition, any compounds that we develop may not demonstrate in patients the chemical and pharmacological properties ascribed to them in laboratory studies, and they may interact with human biological systems in unforeseen, ineffective or harmful ways.
Our Planned RNAi SubsidiaryMolecular Chaperone Co-Induction Drug Candidates May Not Be Able to Obtain Sufficient Funding, and We May Not Control a Majority of the Planned Subsidiary if We Obtain Financing
     We are currently pursuing a plan to transfer all of our RNAi therapeutics assets into a newly-formed subsidiary to accelerate the development and commercialization of drugs based on RNAi technology. Although we believe that this structure may facilitate our obtaining additional financing to pursue our RNAi development efforts, we have no commitments or arrangements for any financing, and there is no assurance that we will be able to obtain financing for this purpose. Our planned RNAi subsidiary will be only partially owned by us. Depending upon the amount and terms of its future financing activities, we may not control the subsidiary, or may share control with other shareholders whose interests may not be directly aligned with ours. It also is possible that any products developed by the RNAi subsidiary could eventually compete with our products for some disease indications, such as ALS, type 2 diabetes and obesity.
The Drug Candidates Acquired from Biorex May Not ObtainReceive Regulatory Marketing Approvals
     On October 4, 2004,In September 2006, we acquiredannounced results of our Phase IIa clinical testing of arimoclomol for the treatment of ALS. We reported that arimoclomol had met the trial’s primary endpoints of safety and tolerability at all three doses tested in the Phase IIa trial, and that the trial results indicated a non-statistically-significant trend of improvement in functional capacity as measured by the Revised ALS Functional Ration Scale in the arimoclomol high dose group as compared with untreated patients. There is no assurance, however, that the results and achievements described will be supported by further analysis of the clinical and pharmaceutical assets and related intellectual propertyPhase IIa trial or open-label extension data, or by the results of Biorex, including three drug candidates (arimoclomol, iroxanadine and bimoclomol), and a library of small molecule drug candidates. Although each of arimoclomol, iroxanadine and bimoclomol has undergone clinical testing, significant and costly additional testing will be required in order to bring any product to market. We may be unable to confirm in our pre-clinical orsubsequent clinical trials, with arimoclomol, iroxanadine or bimoclomol the favorable pre-clinical or clinical data previously generated by European investigators for these drug candidates, which could require us to have to modify our development plans for these compounds.
     In September 2005, we initiated Phase II clinical testing for arimoclomol for ALS. There are no assurances that the clinical testing will be successful, or that the FDA will permit us to commence our planned Phase IIb clinical trial upon the completion of our ongoing Phase IIa clinical trial. Any additionalon a timely basis or at all. The requirements imposed by the FDA in connection with the ongoing Phase IIa trial, or in connection with our planned Phase IIb trial could add furtherto the time and expense for us to carry out this trial.
     We believe that the FDA may accept the completion of a successful Phase II clinical program as sufficient to enable us to submit a New Drug Application, or NDA; however, there areis no assurancesassurance that the FDA will accept our Phase II program in lieu of a Phase III clinical trial. If the FDA requires us to complete a Phase III clinical trial, the cost of development of arimoclomol will increase significantly beyond our estimated costs, and the time to completion of clinical testing wouldalso will be significantly delayed. In addition, the FDA ultimately could require us to achieve an efficacy end point in the clinical trials for arimoclomol that could be more difficult, expensive and time-consuming

16


than our planned end point. Although we anticipate developing arimoclomol for the treatment of ALS, arimoclomol has also shown therapeutic efficacy in a preclinical animal model of diabetes and we may pursue development of arimoclomol for diabetic indications. However, such development would require significant and costly additional testing. There is no guarantee that arimoclomol wouldwill show any efficacy for any other indications.indication.
     Iroxanadine has been tested in two Phase I clinical trials and one Phase II clinical trial which showedindicated improvement in the function of endothelial cells in blood vessels of patients at risk of cardiovascular disease. We intend tomight develop this product to improve endothelial dysfunction in indications such as diabetic retinopathy and wound healing, which will require significant and costly additional testing. There is no guarantee that iroxanadine will show any efficacy in the intended uses we are seeking. We may also attempt to license iroxanadine to larger pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies for cardiovascular indications; however, there is no guarantee that any such company will be interested in licensing iroxanadine from us or licensing it on terms that are favorableattractive to us.
     Bimoclomol has been tested in two Phase II clinical trials where it was shown to be safe, but where it did not show efficacy for diabetic neuropathy, the indication for which it was tested. We intend tomay develop this compound for other therapeutic indications; however, there can be no guarantee that this compound will be effective in treating any diseases. In addition, the FDA may require us to perform new safety clinical trials, which would be expensive and time consuming and would delay development of bimoclomol.
     There is no guarantee that any additional clinical trials will be successful or that the FDA will approve any of these products and allow us to begin selling them in the United States.
     Our Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Laboratory May Not Be Able to Develop ProductsWe Have Identified Material Weaknesses in our Internal Control over Financial Reporting
     In orderthis Annual Report, we are reporting material weaknesses in the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting related to develop new obesitythe application of generally accepted accounting principles arising from our accounting for historical warrant anti-dilution adjustments as deemed dividends, and type 2 diabetes products,in the effectiveness of our internal controls over quarterly and annual financial statement reporting arising from our accounting for research and development expenses related to our laboratory facility in Worcester, Massachusetts, which are described in more detail below under the heading “Controls and Procedures.” Despite our substantial efforts to ensure the integrity of our financial reporting process, we will first need to identify appropriate drug targets and pathways. We are using novel RNAi-based techniques to accelerate this process, but there is no assurance that these techniques will accelerate our work orcannot guarantee that we will be ablenot identify additional weaknesses as we continue to identify highly promising targets or pathways using these techniques or otherwise. Even ifwork with the new systems that we are successful in identifying these targets or pathways, we will need to then develop proprietary molecules that are safe and effective against these targets. The development process and the clinical testing of our potential products will take a lengthy period of time and involve expenditures substantially in excess of our current financial resources that are available for this purpose. We are currently seeking a strategic alliance with a major pharmaceutical or biotechnology company to complete the development, clinical testing and manufacturing and marketing of our potential obesity and type 2 diabetes products, which are at an early stage of development, but we may not be able to secure such a strategic partner on attractive terms or at all. We do not have prior experience in operating a genomic and proteomic-based drug discovery company. Accordingly, we will be heavily dependent on the prior experience and current efforts of Dr. Michael P. Czech, the Chairman of our Scientific Advisory Board, Dr. Jack Barber, our Senior Vice President — Drug Development, and Dr. Mark A. Tepper, our Senior Vice President — Drug Discovery, in establishing our scientific goals and strategies.
We Will Be Reliant Upon SynthRx to Develop and Commercialize Flocor
     In June 2004, we licensed Flocor and our other co-polymer technologies to SynthRx and acquired a 19.9% equity interest in that newly formed biopharmaceutical company. SynthRx has only limited financial resources and will have to either raise significant additional capital or secure a licensee or strategic partner to complete the development and commercialization of Flocor and these other technologies. We are not aware that SynthRx has any commitments from third parties to provide the capital that it will require, and there can be no assurance that it will be able to obtain this capital or a licensee or strategic partner on satisfactory terms or at all.
     Our prior Phase III clinical trial of Flocor for the treatment of sickle cell disease patients experiencing an acute vaso-occlusive crisis did not achieve its primary objective. However, in this study, for patients 15 years of age or younger, the number of patients achieving a resolution of crisis was higher for Flocor-treated patients at all time periods than for placebo-treated patients, which may indicate that future clinical trials should focus on juvenile patients. Generating sufficient data to seek FDA approval for Flocor will require additional clinical studies which have not yet been funded or commenced by SynthRx, and those studies will entail substantial time and expense for

1719


SynthRx.
     The manufactureimplemented over the past year. Any continuing material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting could result in errors in our financial statements, which could erode market confidence in our company, adversely affect the market price of Flocor involves obtaining new raw drug substanceour common stock and, a supply of the purified drug from the raw drug substance, which requires specialized equipment. Should SynthRx encounter difficulty in obtaining the purified drug substanceegregious circumstances, result in sufficient amounts and at acceptable prices, SynthRx may be unable to complete the development or commercialization of Flocor on a timely basis or at all.possible claims based upon such financial information.
     We Are Subject to Intense Competition, That Could Materially Impact Our Operating Resultsand There is No Assurance that We Can Compete Successfully
     We and our strategic partners or licensees may be unable to compete successfully against our current or future competitors. The pharmaceutical, biopharmaceutical and biotechnology industry is characterized by intense competition and rapid and significant technological advancements. Many companies, research institutions and universities are working in a number of areas similar to our primary fields of interest to develop new products. There also is intense competition among companies seeking to acquire products that already are being marketed. Many of the companies with which we compete have or are likely to have substantially greater research and product development capabilities and financial, technical, scientific, manufacturing, marketing, distribution and other resources than at least some of our present or future strategic partners or licensees.
     As a result, these competitors may:
  Succeed in developing competitive products sooner than us or our strategic partners or licensees.
 
  Obtain FDA and other regulatory approvals for their products before we can obtain approval of any of our products.
 
  Obtain patents that block or otherwise inhibit the development and commercialization of our product candidates.
 
  Develop products that are safer or more effective than our products.
 
  Devote greater resources to marketing or selling their products.
 
  Introduce or adapt more quickly to new technologies orand other scientific advances.
 
  Introduce products that render our products obsolete.
 
  Withstand price competition more successfully than us or our strategic partners or licensees.
 
  Negotiate third-party strategic alliances or licensing arrangements more effectively.
 
  Take advantage of other opportunities more readily.
     A numberWe are aware of medical institutions and pharmaceutical companies are seeking to develop products based on gene silencing technologies. Companies working in this area include Sirna Therapeutics, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Acuity Pharmaceuticals, Nastech Pharmaceutical Company Inc., Nucleonics, Inc., Benitec Ltd. and a number of the multinational pharmaceutical companies. A number of products currently are being marketed by a variety of the multinational or other pharmaceutical companies for treating type II diabetes, including among others the diabetes drugs Avandia® by Glaxo SmithKline PLC, Actos® by Eli Lilly & Co., Glucophage® by Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Symlin® by Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Starlix® by Novartis and the obesity drugs Acomplia® by Sanofi-Aventis SA, Xenical® by F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. and Meridia® by Abbott Laboratories. Many major pharmaceutical companies are also seeking to develop new therapies for these disease indications. Companies developing HIV vaccines that could compete with our HIV vaccine technology include Merck, VaxGen, Inc., AlphaVax, Inc. and Immunitor Corporation.

18


          Currently,only one drug, Rilutek,®, which was developed by Aventis Pharma AG, is the only drug of which we are aware that has been approved by the FDA for the treatment of ALS.ALS, which is now available in generic form. Other companies are working to develop pharmaceuticals to treat ALS, including Aeolus Pharmaceuticals, Celgene Corporation, Mitsubishi Pharma Corporation, Ono Pharmaceuticals, Trophos SA, FaustPharmaceuticals SA, and Oxford BioMedica plc.plc, and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. In addition, ALS belongs to a family of diseases called neurodegenerative diseases, which includes Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and Huntington’s disease. Due to similarities between these diseases, a new treatment for one ailment potentially could be useful for treating others.
     There also are many companies that are producing and developing drugs used to treat neurodegenerative diseases other than ALS, including Amgen, Inc., Cephalon, Inc., Ceregene, Inc., Elan Pharmaceuticals, plc, Forest Laboratories, Inc., H. Lundbeck A/S, Phytopharm plc, and Schwarz Pharma AG.

20


     Although we do not expect Flocor to have direct competition from otherA number of products currently available or that we are aware of that are being developed related to Flocor’s ability to reduce blood viscosity in the cardiovascular area, there are a number of anticoagulant products that Flocor would have to compete against, such as tissue plasminogen activator, or t-PA, and streptokinase (blood clot dissolving enzymes) as well as blood thinners such as heparin and coumatin, even though Flocor actsmarketed by a different mechanism to prevent damage due to blood coagulation. Invariety of the sickle cell disease area, Flocor would compete againstmultinational or other pharmaceutical companies that are developing or marketing other products to treat sickle cell disease, such as Droxia® (hydroxyurea) marketedfor treating type 2 diabetes, including among others the diabetes drugs Avandia by GlaxoSmithKline PLC, Actos by Eli Lilly & Co., Glucophage and Junavia by Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Symlin and Dacogentm, which is being developedByetta by SuperGen, Inc. Our TranzFect technology will compete against a number of companies that have developed adjuvant products, such as the adjuvant QS-21tm marketed by Antigenics,Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and adjuvants marketedStarlix by Corixa Corp.Novartis and the obesity drugs Acomplia by Sanofi-Aventis SA, Xenical by F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. and Meridia by Abbott Laboratories. Many major pharmaceutical companies are also seeking to develop new therapies for these disease indications. Companies developing HIV vaccines that could compete with our HIV vaccine technology include Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi Pasteur, VaxGen, Inc., AlphaVax, Inc. and Immunitor Corporation. These competitors have substantially greater research and product development capabilities and financial, technical, scientific, manufacturing, marketing, distribution and other resources than RXi.
We Do Not Have the Ability to Manufacture Any of Our Products and Will Need to Rely upon Third Parties for the Manufacture of Our Clinical and Commercial Product Supplies
     We do not currently have the facilities or expertise to manufacture any of the clinical or commercial supplies of any of our products,product candidates, including the clinical supply of arimoclomol used in our Phase II clinical trials. Accordingly, we are and will be dependent upon contract manufacturers or our strategic alliance partners to manufacture these supplies, or we will need to acquire the ability to manufacture these supplies ourselves, which could be very difficult, time-consuming and costly.supplies. We have a manufacturing supply arrangement in place with respect to the clinical supplies for both the Phase IIa and Phase IIb trialsII clinical program for arimoclomol for ALS. We do not otherwise have no manufacturing supply arrangements for any of our other product candidates, including any of the licensed RNAi technology, the other drug candidates acquired from Biorex or, with the exception of the clinical supplies for the current Phase I trial, the HIV vaccine product that utilizes the HIV vaccine technology that we have licensed from UMMS. Thereand there can be no assurance that we will be able to secure needed manufacturing supply arrangements or acquire the ability to manufacture the products ourselves, on attractive terms, or at all. Delays in, or aOur failure to secure these arrangements or abilitiesas needed could have a materially adverse effect on our ability to complete the development of our products or to commercialize them.
We May Be Unable to Protect Our Intellectual Property Rights, Which Could Adversely Affect the Value of Our Assets
     We believe that obtaining and maintaining patent and other intellectual property rights for our technologies and potential products is critical to establishing and maintaining the value of our assets and our business. Although we believe that we have significantpatents and patent coverage for the technologies that we acquired from Biorex and forapplications directed to our TranzFectmolecular chaperone co-induction technologies, there can be no assurance that this coveragethese patents and applications will be broad enough to prevent third parties from developing or commercializing similar or identical technologies, that the validity of our patents will be upheld if challenged by third parties or that our technologies will not be deemed to infringe the intellectual property rights of third parties. In particular, although we conducted certain due diligence regarding the patents and patent applications acquired from Biorexrelated to our molecular chaperone co-induction drug candidates, and received certain representations and warranties from Biorexthe seller in connection with the acquisition, the patents and patent applications acquired from Biorexrelated to our molecular chaperone co-induction drug candidates were issued or filed, as applicable, prior to our acquisition and thus there can be no assurance that the validity, enforceability and ownership of those patents and patent applications will be upheld if challenged by third parties. We have a nonexclusive license to a patent owned by UMMS and the Carnegie Institution of Washington that claims various aspects of gene silencing, or genetic inhibition by double-stranded RNA, but there can be no assurance that this patent will withstand possible

19


third-party challenges or otherwise protect our technologies from competition. The medical applications of the gene silencing technology and the other technologies that we have licensed from the UMMS also are claimed in a number of pending patent applications, but there can be no assurance that these applications will result in any issued patents or that those patents will withstand third-party challenges or protect our technologies from competition. Moreover, we are aware of at least one other issued United States patent claiming broad applications for RNAi, and many patent applications covering different methods and compositions in the field of RNAi therapeutics have been and are expected to be filed, and certain organizations or researchers may hold or seek to obtain patents that could make it more difficult or impossible for us to develop products based on the gene silencing technology that we have licensed. We are aware that at least one of our competitors is seeking patent coverage in the RNAi field that could restrict our ability to develop certain RNAi-based therapeutics.
     Any litigation brought by us to protect our intellectual property rights or by third parties asserting intellectual property rights against us, or challenging our patents, could be costly and have a material adverse effect on our operating results or financial condition, make it more difficult for us to enter into strategic alliances with third parties to develop our products, or discourage our existing licensees from continuing their development work on our potential products. If our patent coverage is insufficient to prevent third parties from developing or commercializing similar or identical technologies, the value of our assets is likely to be materially and adversely affected.
     We are sponsoring research at UMMS and Massachusetts General Hospital under agreements that give us certain rights to acquire licenses to inventions, if any, that arise from that research, and we may enter into additional research agreements with those institutions, or others, in the future. We also have a collaboration and invention disclosure agreement with UMMS under which UMMS has agreed to disclose to us certain inventions it makes and to give us an option to negotiate licenses to the disclosed technologies. There can be no assurance, however, that any such inventions will arise, that we will be able to acquire licenses to any inventions under satisfactory terms or at all, or that any licenses will be useful to us commercially.
We May Incur Substantial Costs from FutureAre Subject to Potential Liabilities From Clinical Testing orand Future Product Liability Claims
     If any of our products are alleged to be defective, they may expose us to claims for personal injury by patients in clinical trials of our products or by patients using our commercially marketed products. Even if the commercialization of one or more of our products is approved by the FDA, users may claim that such products caused unintended adverse effects. We currently do not carry product liability insurance covering the commercial marketing of these products. We have obtained clinical trial insurance for our recently-initiated Phase IIa clinical trial withof arimoclomol for the treatment of ALS, and will seek to obtain suchsimilar insurance for the planned Phase IIb

21


clinical trial of arimoclomol and any other clinical trials that we conduct, including the planned Phase IIb clinical trial for arimoclomol, as well as liability insurance for any products that we market, although theremarket. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional insurance in the amounts we seek, or at all. We anticipate that our licensees who are developing our products will carry liability insurance covering the clinical testing and marketing of those products. However, if someone assertsThere is no assurance, however, that any insurance maintained by us or our licensees will prove adequate in the event of a claim against us and our insurance or the insurance coverage of our licensees or if their other financial resources are inadequate to cover a successful claim, such successful claim could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or cause us to discontinue operations.us. Even if claims asserted against us are unsuccessful, they may divert management’s attention from our operations and we may have to incur substantial costs to defend such claims.
Compliance with Requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Will Increase Our Costs and Require Additional Management Resources, and We May Not Successfully ComplyBe Unable to Acquire Products Approved For Marketing
     As directedIn the future, we may seek to acquire products from third parties that already are being marketed or have been approved for marketing. We have not identified any of these products, and we do not have any prior experience in acquiring or marketing products and may need to find third parties to market any products that we might acquire. We may also seek to acquire products through a merger with one or more companies that own such products. In any such merger, the owners of our merger partner could be issued or hold a substantial, or even controlling, amount of stock in our company or, in the event that the other company is the surviving company, in that other company.
Risks Associated With Our Ownership of RXi
     The value of our ownership interest in RXi will depend upon RXi’s success in developing and commercializing products based upon its RNAi technologies, which is subject to significant risks and uncertainties, including the following:
RXi Will Be Subject to Risks of a New Business
     RXi is a start-up company with no operating history. RXi will focus solely on developing and commercializing therapeutic products based upon its RNAi technologies, and there is no assurance that RXi will be able to successfully implement its business plan. While RXi’s management collectively possesses substantial business experience, including experience in taking start-up companies from early stage to an operational stage, there is no assurance that they will be able to manage RXi’s business effectively, or that they will be able to identify, hire and retain any needed additional management or scientific personnel, to develop and implement RXi’s product development plans, obtain third-party contracts or any needed financing, or achieve the other components of RXi’s business plan.
The Approach RXi is Taking to Discover and Develop Novel Therapeutics Using RNAi is Unproven and May Never Lead to Marketable Products
     The RNAi technologies that RXi has licensed from UMMS have not yet been clinically tested by Section 404RXi or by us, nor are we aware of any clinical trials having been completed by third parties involving similar technologies. To date, neither we nor any other company has received regulatory approval to market therapeutics utilizing RNAi. The scientific discoveries that form the Sarbanes-Oxley Actbasis for RXi’s efforts to discover and develop new drugs are relatively new. The scientific evidence to support the feasibility of 2002,developing drugs based on these discoveries is both preliminary and limited. Successful development of RNAi-based products by RXi will require solving a number of issues, including providing suitable methods of stabilizing the SEC adopted rules requiring public companiesRNAi drug material and delivering it into target cells in the human body. RXi may spend large amounts of money trying to solve these issues, and never succeed in doing so. In addition, any compounds that RXi develops may not demonstrate in patients the chemical and pharmacological properties ascribed to them in laboratory studies, and they may interact with human biological systems in unforeseen, ineffective or even harmful ways.
RXi May Be Unable to Protect Its Intellectual Property Rights Licensed From UMMS or May Need to License Additional Intellectual Property from Others.
     The assets we contributed to RXi include a reportnon-exclusive license to the fundamental Fire and Mello patent owned by UMMS and the Carnegie Institution of management on the company’s internal controls over financial reporting in their annual reports on Form 10-K. In addition, the independent registered public accounting firm auditing the company’s financial statements must attest to and report on management’s assessmentWashington, which claims various aspects of the effectiveness of the company’s internal controls over financial reporting. Although the SEC has postponed the effectiveness of this requirement several times, if the SEC does not postpone or otherwise alter the requirement again, then we expect that it will first apply to our annual report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2006. If we are required to comply, we will incur significant legal, accounting, and other expenses and compliance will occupy a substantialgene

2022


amountsilencing, or genetic inhibition by double-stranded RNA, but there can be no assurance that this patent or other pending applications or issued patents belonging to its patent family will withstand possible legal challenges or otherwise protect the covered technologies from competition. Therapeutic applications of timegene silencing technology and other technologies that RXi licenses from UMMS are also claimed in a number of UMMS pending patent applications, but there can be no assurance that these applications will result in any issued patents or that those patents would withstand possible legal challenges or protect RXi’s technologies from competition. We are aware of a number of third party-issued patents directed to various particular forms and compositions of RNAi-mediating molecules, and therapeutic methods using them, that RXi will not use. Third parties may, however, hold or seek to obtain additional patents that could make it more difficult or impossible for RXi to develop products based on the gene silencing technology that RXi has licensed.
     RXi has entered into an invention disclosure agreement with UMMS under which UMMS has agreed to disclose to RXi certain inventions it makes and to give RXi the exclusive right to negotiate licenses to the disclosed technologies. There can be no assurance, however, that any such inventions will arise, that RXi will be able to negotiate licenses to any inventions on satisfactory terms, or at all, or that any negotiated licenses will prove commercially successful.
     RXi may need to license additional intellectual property rights from third parties in order to be able to complete the development or enhance the efficacy of its product candidates or avoid possible infringement of the rights of others. There is no assurance that RXi will be able to acquire any additional intellectual property rights on satisfactory terms, or at all.
RXi May Not Be Able to Obtain Sufficient Financing
     In order to retain the 2007 UMMS licenses and effectuate the new UMMS invention disclosure agreement, RXi is required to obtain significant funding in the coming few months. Although CytRx has the resources to provide that funding, if necessary, CytRx is not committed to do so, and RXi has no commitments or arrangements for any third-party financing. The loss of the 2007 UMMS licenses and new UMMS invention disclosure agreement could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our boardcommon stock and could materially and adversely affect RXi’s ability to develop the RNAi technologies that we contributed to RXi.
     Following the initial funding, RXi will require substantial additional financing in the future in connection with its RNAi research and development activities and any commercialization of directorsits products. We contributed all of our RNAi-related technologies to RXi in order to accelerate the development and management. Uncertainty exists regardingcommercialization of drugs based upon these and RXi’s other RNAi technologies. Although we believe that this will facilitate obtaining additional financing to pursue RXi’s RNAi development efforts, RXi has no commitments or arrangements for any financing, and there is no assurance that it will be able to obtain any future financing.
     Under our abilityagreement with RXi and its other current stockholders, with some exceptions, CytRx will have preemptive rights to acquire a portion of any new securities sold or issued by RXi so as to maintain our percentage ownership of RXi. Depending upon the terms and provisions of any proposed sale of new securities by RXi, we may be unable or unwilling to exercise our preemptive rights, in which event our percentage ownership of RXi will be diluted. In order to maintain our percentage ownership of RXi, we may need to obtain our own financing, which may or may not be available to us on satisfactory terms, or at all.
We Will Be Required To Dispose of Some of Our RXi Shares, and May Not Be Able To Do So On Attractive Terms
     Following RXi’s initial funding, we have agreed under our letter agreement with UMMS and our separate stockholders agreement with RXi and its other current stockholders to reduce our share of ownership of RXi to less than a majority of the outstanding voting power as soon as reasonably practicable. We may seek to dispose of a portion of our RXi shares through a dividend or distribution of such shares to our stockholders, a sale or other disposition to one or more third parties, or other means. Any proposed dividend or other distribution to our stockholders of RXi shares would be subject to SEC rules and the requirements of the

23


Delaware General Corporation Law. We may be unable to comply with these rules and requirements, by the SEC’s current deadlines. If we are unableor may experience delays in complying. Any such dividend or distribution also would likely be taxable to complete the required assessment asour stockholders. We have no agreement, understanding or arrangement with respect to the adequacypossible disposition of any of our internalRXi shares.
RXi Will Retain Discretion Over Its Use of Any Funds That We Provide To It
     Although RXi currently is a majority-owned subsidiary of ours, we do not control reportingthe day-to-day operations of RXi. Accordingly, all funds received by RXi, whether or not from us, will be used by RXi in any manner its management deems appropriate, including for its own working capital and general corporate purposes, including the payment of salaries and employee expenses of its officers and other employees, amounts called for under the UMMS licenses and invention disclosure agreement, and for other costs and expenses of its RNAi research and development activities. Our interests will be represented by two members of the board of directors of RXi who may be able to influence RXi’s decisions regarding the use of RXi’s funds and any proceeds we contribute to RXi. However, we will have no right to control RXi’s use of its funds.
We Will Not Control RXi, And The Officers, Directors and Other RXi Stockholders May Have Interests That Are Different From Ours
     We have entered into a letter agreement with UMMS and a separate agreement with RXi and its other current stockholders under which we agree during the term of RXi’s new licenses from UMMS to vote our shares of RXi common stock for the election of directors of RXi and to take other actions to ensure that a majority of the RXi board of directors are independent of us. These agreements will become effective only upon RXi’s initial funding. Upon the initial funding, if we concludeown at any time a majority of the outstanding voting power of RXi, we have agreed that we will reduce our internal controls over financial reportingownership to less than a majority as soon as reasonably practicable. At any time at which we own less than a majority of the voting power RXi, we will not be able to solely determine the outcome of matters submitted to a vote of RXi stockholders. The other stockholders of RXi also may have interests that are different from ours. Accordingly, RXi may engage in actions or develop its business and operations in a manner that we believe are not effective or ifin our independent registered public accounting firm is unablebest interests.
Products Developed by RXi Could Eventually Compete With Our Products For ALS, Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity and Other Disease Indications
     RXi has determined to provide us withfocus its initial efforts on developing an unqualified report as toRNAi therapeutics for the effectivenesstreatment of our internal controls over financial reporting asa specific form of December 31, 2006 and future year ends, investors could lose confidenceALS caused by a defect in the reliabilitySOD1 gene. Although arimoclomol is being developed by CytRx for all forms of ourALS, it is possible that any products developed by RXi for the treatment of ALS could compete with any ALS products that CytRx may develop. RXi also plans to pursue the development of RNAi therapeutics for the treatment of obesity and type 2 diabetes, which could compete with any products that CytRx may develop for the treatment of these diseases. The potential commercial success of any products that CytRx may develop for these and other diseases may be adversely effected by competing products that RXi may develop.
RXi Will Be Subject to Competition, and It May Not Be Able To Compete Successfully
     A number of medical institutions and pharmaceutical companies are seeking to develop products based on gene silencing technologies. Companies working in this area include Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Sirna Therapeutics (which was recently acquired by Merck), Acuity Pharmaceuticals, Nastech Pharmaceutical Company Inc., Nucleonics, Inc., Tacere Therapeutics Inc. and Benitec Ltd. and a number of the multinational pharmaceutical companies. These competitors have substantially greater research and development capabilities and financial, reporting. In addition, while we planscientific, technical, manufacturing, marketing, distribution, and other resources than RXi, and RXi may not be able to expand our staff to assist in complyingcompete successfully.

24


Risks Associated with the additional requirements when and if they become applicable, we may encounter substantial difficulty attracting qualified staff with requisite experience due to the high level of competition for experienced financial professionals.Our Common Stock
Our Anti-Takeover Provisions May Make It More Difficult to Change Our Management or May Discourage Others From Acquiring Us and Thereby Adversely Affect Stockholder Value
     We have a stockholder rights plan and provisions in our bylaws that may discourage or prevent a person or group from acquiring us without the approval of our board of directors. We recently extended the stockholder rights plan through April 2017. The intent of the stockholder rights plan and our bylaw provisions is to protect our stockholders’ interests by encouraging anyone seeking control of our company to negotiate with our board of directors.
     We have a classified board of directors, which requiresmeans that at least two stockholder meetings, instead of one, will be required to effect a change in the majority control of our board of directors. This provision applies to every election of directors, not just an election occurring after a change in control. The classification of our board increases the amount of time it takes to change majority control of our board of directors and may cause our potential purchasers to lose interest in the potential purchase of us, regardless of whether our purchase would be beneficial to us or our stockholders. The additional time and cost to change a majority of the members of our board of directors makes it more difficult and may discourage our existing stockholders from seeking to change our existing management in order to change the strategic direction or operational performance of our company.
     Our bylaws provide that directors may only be removed for cause by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of our capital stock then entitled to vote at an election of directors. This provision prevents stockholders from removing any incumbent director without cause. Our bylaws also provide that a stockholder must give us at least 120 days notice of a proposal or director nomination that such stockholder desires to present at any annual meeting or special meeting of stockholders. Such provision prevents a stockholder from making a proposal or director nomination at a stockholder meeting without us having advance notice of that proposal or director nomination. This could make a change in control more difficult by providing our directors with more time to prepare an opposition to a proposed change in control. By making it more difficult to remove or install new directors, the foregoing bylaw provisions may also make our existing management less responsive to the views of our stockholders with respect to our operations and other issues such as management selection and management compensation.
Our Outstanding Options and Warrants and the Registrations of Our Shares Issued in the Global Genomics Merger and Our Recent Private Financings May Adversely Affect the Trading Price of Our Common Stock
     As of December 31, 2005,February 28, 2007, there were outstanding stock options and warrants to purchase approximately 24.723.4 million shares of our common stock at exercise prices ranging from $0.20 to $2.73$2.70 per share. Our outstanding options and warrants could adversely affect our ability to obtain future financing or engage in certain mergers or other transactions, since the holders of options and warrants can be expected to exercise them at a time when we may be able to obtain additional capital through a new offering of securities on terms more favorable to us than the terms of outstanding options and warrants. For the life of the options and warrants, the holders have the opportunity to profit from a rise in the market price of our common stock without assuming the risk of ownership. To the extent the trading price of our common stock at the time of exercise of any such options or warrants exceeds the exercise price, such exercise will also have a dilutive effect on our stockholders. In addition, warrants issued in connection with our financings in 2003Warrants to purchase approximately 2.8 million shares contain anti-dilution provisions that are triggered upon certain events, including any issuance of securities by us below the prevailing market price.price of our common stock. Warrants to purchase approximately 23.4 million shares contain anti-dilution provisions pertaining to dividends or distributions with respect to our common stock that could be triggered if we were to make a dividend or distribution of RXi shares while the warrants remain outstanding. In the event that thosethese anti-dilution provisions are triggered by us in the future, we would be required to reduce the exercise price, and increase the number of shares underlying,

21


those warrants, which would have a dilutive effect on our stockholders.

25


     In AugustSince 2003, we have registered with the SEC for resale by the holders a total of 14,408,252approximately 51.1 million outstanding shares of our outstanding common stock and an additional 3,848,870approximately 22.6 million shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options and warrants, which shares and options and warrants were issued primarily in connection with our merger with Global Genomics and the $5.4 million private equity financing that we completed in May 2003. In December 2003, we registered a total of 6,113,448 shares of our common stock, consisting of the 5,175,611 shares issued, or that are issuable upon exercise of the warrants issued, in connection with the $8.7 million private equity financing that we completed in September 2003, and an additional 937,837 shares of our common stock that we issued, or that are issuable upon the exercise of warrants that we issued, to certain other third parties. In November 2004, we registered 4,000,000 shares of our common stock and an additional 3,080,000 shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants in connection with the $4,000,000 private equity financing that we completed in October 2004, and an additional 1,550,000 shares of our common stock issued or issuable upon exercise of warrants to other third parties. In February 2005, we registered 17,334,494 shares of our common stock and an additional 9,909,117 shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants in connection with the $21.3 million private equity financing that we completed in January 2005. In April 2006, we expect to file a registration statement to register 10,650,794 shares of our common stock and an additional 5,325,397 shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants in connection with the $13.4 million private equity financing that we completed in March 2006. Both thewarrants. The availability for public resale of these various shares, and theas well as actual resaleresales of these shares, could adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.
We May Issue Preferred Stock in the Future, and the Terms of the Preferred Stock May Reduce the Value of Our Common Stock
     We are authorized to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series. Our board of directors may determine the terms of future preferred stock offerings without further action by our stockholders. If we issue preferred stock, it could affect your rights or reduce the value of our outstanding common stock. In particular, specific rights granted to future holders of preferred stock may include voting rights, preferences as to dividends and liquidation, conversion and redemption rights, sinking fund provisions, and restrictions on our ability to merge with or sell our assets to a third party.
Changes in Stock Option Accounting Rules May Adversely Impact Our Reported Operating Results, Our Stock Price and Our Competitiveness in the Employee Marketplace
     In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board published new rules that will require companies in 2005 to record all stock-based employee compensation as an expense. The new rules apply to stock options grants, as well as a range of other stock-based compensation arrangements, including restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. We will have to apply the new financial accounting rules beginning in the first quarter of 2006. We have depended in the past upon compensating our officers, directors, employees and consultants with such stock-based compensation awards in order to limit our cash expenditures and to attract and retain officers, directors, employees and consultants. Accordingly, if we continue to grant stock options or other stock-based compensation awards to our officers, directors, employees, and consultants after the new rules apply to us, our future earnings, if any, will be reduced (or our future losses will be increased) by the expenses recorded for those grants. The expenses we may have to record as a result of future options grants may be significant and may materially negatively affect our reported financial results. The adverse effects that the new accounting rules may have on our future financial statements should we continue to rely heavily on stock-based compensation may reduce our stock price and make it more difficult for us to attract new investors. In addition, reducing our use of stock plans to reward and incentivize our officers, directors and employees could result in a competitive disadvantage to us in the employee marketplace.

22


We May Experience Volatility in Our Stock Price, Which May Adversely Affect the Trading Price of Our Common Stock
     The market price of our common stock has experienced significant volatility inranged from $0.87 to $5.49 per share during the past52-week period ended March 23, 2007, and may continue to experience significant volatility from time to time. Our stock price has ranged from $0.21 to $3.74 per share over the past three years. Factors such as the following may affect such volatility:
  Our quarterly operating results.
Announcementsannouncements of regulatory developments or technological innovations by us or our competitors.competitors;
 
  Government regulation of drug pricing.changes in our relationship with our licensors and other strategic partners;
 
  Developmentschanges in patentour ownership or other technology ownership rights.relationships with RXi;
 
  Publicour quarterly operating results;
developments in patent or other technology ownership rights;
public concern regarding the safety of our products.products;
     Othergovernment regulation of drug pricing; andother factors which may affect our stock price are general changes in the economy, the financial markets or the pharmaceutical or biotechnology industries.
Item 2.PropertiesPROPERTIES
     Our operationsheadquarters are basedlocated in leased facilities in Los Angeles, California, and Worcester, Massachusetts.California. The lease for our headquarters facility in Los Angeles covers approximately 4,700 square feet of office space and expires in June 2008. The
     We also lease for our laboratory in Worcester covers approximately 6,900 square feet of office and laboratory space andin Worcester, Massachusetts, which CytRx shares with RXi. The lease expires in December 2007. Our headquarters and laboratory facilities are suitable and adequatesufficient for our current operations.purposes.
Item 3.Legal ProceedingsLEGAL PROCEEDINGS
     We are occasionally involved in claims arising out of our operations in the normal course of business, none of which are expected, individually or in the aggregate, to have a material adverse effect on us.

2326


PART II
Item 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity SecuritiesInformation
     Our common stock is currently traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “CYTR.” The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices for our common stock for the periods indicated as reported by the Nasdaq Capital Market.Market:
                
 High Low High Low 
Fiscal Year 2007:
 
 
First Quarter through March 23  $5.49  $1.74 
 
Fiscal Year 2006:
  
January 1 to March 28 $1.87 $1.01 
Fiscal Year 2005:
 
 
Fourth Quarter $1.13 $0.85   $2.04  $1.21 
Third Quarter $1.22 $0.76   $1.94  $0.87 
Second Quarter $1.44 $0.75   $2.30  $1.06 
First Quarter $2.07 $1.14   $1.92  $1.01 
Fiscal Year 2004:
 
 
Fiscal Year 2005:
 
 
Fourth Quarter $1.75 $1.10   $1.13  $0.85 
Third Quarter $1.80 $0.94   $1.22  $0.76 
Second Quarter $2.10 $1.06   $1.44  $0.75 
First Quarter $2.43 $1.43   $2.07  $1.14 
Holders
     On March 15, 2006,23, 2007, there were approximately 10,9008,800 holders of record of our common stock. The number of record holders does not reflect the number of beneficial owners of our common stock for whom shares are held by brokerage firms and other institutions.
Dividends
     We have not paid any dividends since our inception and do not contemplate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
     Since the last current report on Form 8-K that we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28, 2007, we have issued a total of 652,734 shares of our common stock in unregistered sales of our equity securities. The 652,734 shares were issued to four holders of warrants in connection with the exercise by such warrant holders of outstanding common stock purchase warrants. The 652,734 shares were issued for the following consideration: 5,000 shares were issued upon the payment of the $2.25 per share warrant exercise price; 136,504 shares were issued upon the payment of the $2.00 per share warrant exercise price; 43,563 shares were issued upon the payment of the $1.86 per share warrant exercise price; 175,000 shares were issued upon the payment of the $1.69 per share warrant exercise price, and 292,667 shares were issued upon the payment of the $1.54 per share warrant exercise price. We received approximately $1.1 million in the aggregate upon the exercise of the foregoing warrants. Our issuance of the 652,734 shares of our common stock upon exercise of the foregoing warrants was exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 pursuant to an exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

27


Comparison of Cumulative Total Returns
     The following line graph presentation compares cumulative total stockholder returns of CytRx with the Nasdaq Stock Market Index and the Nasdaq Pharmaceutical Index (the “Peer Index”) for the five-year period from December 31, 2001 to December 31, 2006. The graph and table assume that $100 was invested in each of CytRx’s common stock, the Nasdaq Stock Market Index and the Peer Index on December 31, 2001, and that all dividends were reinvested. This data was furnished by Zacks Investment Research.
Comparison of Cumulative Total Returns
                            
 
    December 31, 
    2002  2003  2004  2005  2006 
 
CytRx Corporation
   38    286    216    158    294  
 
Nasdaq Stock Market Index
   69    104    113    116    128  
 
Nasdaq Pharmaceutical Index
   65    95    101    111    109  
 

28


Equity Compensation Plans
     The following table sets forth certain information as of December 31, 2006, regarding securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans.
             
          (c) 
          Number of Securities 
          Remaining Available 
  (a)      for Issuance Under 
  Number of Securities  (b)  Equity 
  to be Issued Upon  Weighted-Average  Compensation 
  Exercise of  Exercise Price of  Plans (Excluding 
  Outstanding Options,  Outstanding Options,  Securities 
Plan Category Warrants and Rights  Warrants and Rights  Reflected in Column (a)) 
Equity compensation plans approved by our stockholders:            
1994 Stock Option Plan  9,167  $1.00    
1995 Stock Option Plan         
1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan  100,041   1.02   29,517 
2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan  6,749,000   1.66   2,822,750 
Equity compensation plans not approved by our stockholders:            
Outstanding warrants(1)  3,783,315   1.56    
          
Total:  10,641,523  $1.64   2,852,267 
          
(1)The warrants shown were issued as compensation for various services and do not include warrants sold in private placement transactions. The material terms of such warrants were determined based upon arm’s-length negotiations with the recipients of the warrants. The warrant exercise prices approximated the market price of our common stock at or about the date of grant, and the warrant terms range from 5 to 10 years from the grant date. The warrants contain customary anti-dilution adjustments in the event of a stock split, reverse stock split, reclassification or combination of our outstanding common stock and similar events.

29


Item 6.Selected Financial DataSELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
General
     The following selected financial data are derived from our audited financial statements. Our financial statements for 2006, 2005 2004 and 20032004 have been audited by BDO Seidman, LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm. These historical results do not necessarily indicate future results. When you read this data, it is important that you also read our financial statements and related notes, as well as the section “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Risk Factors.”Factors” sections of this Annual Report. Financial information provided below has been rounded to the nearest thousand.
                     
  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002 
      (restated)             
Statement of Operations Data:
                    
Revenues                    
Recruiting revenues $  $  $  $  $23,000 
License fees  101,000   101,000   428,000   94,000   1,051,000 
Grant income  106,000            46,000 
Service revenues  1,859,000   83,000          
                
Total revenues $2,066,000  $184,000  $428,000  $94,000  $1,120,000 
                
                     
Deemed dividend for anti-dilution adjustments made to outstanding common stock warrants  (488,000)  (1,076,000)         
                
Net loss applicable to common stockholders $(17,240,000) $(16,169,000) $(16,392,000) $(17,845,000) $(6,176,000)
                
Basic and diluted loss per share applicable to common stock $(0.25) $(0.28) $(0.48) $(0.65) $(0.39)
                
                     
Balance Sheet Data:
                    
Cash and cash equivalents $30,381,000  $8,299,000  $1,988,000  $11,644,000  $387,000 
Total assets $31,636,000  $9,939,000  $5,049,000  $12,324,000  $9,284,000 
Total stockholders’ equity $5,150,000  $7,208,000  $1,595,000  $10,193,000  $7,959,000 
Factors Affecting Comparability
     In August 2006, we received approximately $24.5 million in marketable securities (which were sold by us for approximately $24.3 million) from the privately-funded ALS Charitable Remainder Trust, or ALSCRT, in exchange for our commitment to continue research and development of arimoclomol and other potential treatments for ALS and a one percent royalty from worldwide sales of arimoclomol. We have recorded the value received under the arrangement as deferred service revenue. We are recognizing the service revenue using the proportional performance method of revenue recognition, under which service revenue will be recognized as a percentage of actual research and development expense. During 2006, we recognized approximately $1.8 million of service revenue related to this transaction.
     Our Statement of Operations as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 reflects the impact of SFAS 123(R). In accordance with the modified prospective transition method, our results of operations for prior periods have not been restated to reflect the impact of SFAS 123(R). Share-based compensation expense recognized under SFAS 123(R) for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $1.2 million. As of December 31, 2006, there was $952,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding options that is expected to be recognized as a component of our operating expenses through 2009. Compensation costs will be adjusted for future changes in estimated forfeitures.

2430


                     
  2005  2004  2003  2002  2001 
Statement of Operations Data:
                    
Revenues                    
Recruiting revenues $  $  $  $23,000  $101,000 
License fees  101,000   428,000   94,000   1,051,000   3,751,000 
Grant income            46,000   157,000 
Service revenues  83,000             
                
Total revenues $184,000  $428,000  $94,000  $1,120,000  $4,009,000 
                
Net loss $(15,093,000) $(16,392,000) $(17,845,000) $(6,176,000) $(931,000)
                
Basic and diluted loss per common share:                    
Net loss $(0.27) $(0.48) $(0.65) $(0.39) $(0.09)
                
Balance Sheet Data:
                    
Total assets $9,939,000  $5,049,000  $12,324,000  $9,284,000  $7,611,000 
Total stockholders’ equity $7,208,000  $1,595,000  $10,193,000  $7,959,000  $6,583,000 
     In     On March 2, 2006, we completed a $13.4 million private equity financing in which we issued 10,650,79410,650,795 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 5,325,3976,070,953 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.54 per share. Net of investment banking commissions, legal, accounting and other feesexpenses related to the transaction, we received proceeds of approximately $12.4 million.
Factors Affecting Comparabilitymillion of proceeds.
     In January 2005, we completed a $21.3 million private equity financing in which we issued 17,334,494 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 8,667,247 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $2.00 per share. Net of investment banking commissions, legal, accounting and other fees related to the transaction, we received proceeds of approximately $19.4 million.
     In connection with our adjustment to the exercise terms of certain outstanding warrants to purchase common stock on March 2, 2006 and January 20, 2005, we recorded deemed dividends of $488,000 and $1.1 million, respectively. These deemed dividends are reflected as an adjustment to net loss for the first quarter of 2006 and the year ended 2005, as restated, to arrive at net loss applicable to common stockholders on the consolidated statement of operations and for purposes of calculating basic and diluted earnings per shares.
     In the fourth quarter of 2004, we completed our acquisition of all of the clinical, pharmaceutical and related intellectual property assets of Biorex a Hungary-based company focused on the development of novel small molecules with broad therapeutic applications in neurology, diabetes and cardiology.Research & Development, RT. We paid Biorex $3.0 million in cash for the assets at the closing, and incurred approximately $500,000 in expenses related to the transaction.
The assets acquired from Biorex include three drug candidates, including arimoclomol, that had completed the Europeans’ equivalent of a Phase I clinical trial. We intend to perform additional testing on those drug candidates, and initiatedtrial, as well as a Phase II clinical trial for one of the drug candidates, arimoclomol, for ALS in September 2005. In addition, we acquired a 500-compound molecular library, which we plan to use in high throughput screening at our obesity and diabetes laboratory.library. With the assistance of an outside appraiser, we evaluated the technology assets acquired from Biorex includingand their current state of development, the severability of the assets, and alternative uses of the compounds. Based in part on that appraisal, we concluded thatour evaluation, the $3.0 million value allocated to the three drug candidates should bewas written off at the time of acquisition as in-process research and development and that the $500,000 value attributable to the 500-compoundcompound molecular library should bewas included in our fixed assets at December 31, 2004.
     In the third quarter of 2003, we recorded an impairment charge of $5.9 million related to our investments in Blizzard’s acquired developed technology and in Psynomics, based upon our analysis of the recoverability of the carrying amount of these assets in accordance with the Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 18, The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock. This impairment charge represented the total net book value of these assets at the time of the write-off. See Note 12 to our audited financial statements.

2531


Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
     The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read together with the discussion under “Selected Financial Data” and our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements, based on current expectations and related to future events and our future financial performance, that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of many important factors, including those set forth under the caption “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Overview
     We areCytRx Corporation
     CytRx is a biopharmaceutical research and development company engaged in the process of developing human therapeutic products based primarily in the areas ofupon our small molecule therapeutics and ribonucleic acid interference, or RNAi, for the human health care market. Our small molecule therapeutics efforts include our clinical development of three oral drug candidates that we acquired in October 2004, including a Phase II trial initiated in September 2005, as well as our drug discovery operations conducted at our laboratory in Worcester, Massachusetts. Development work on RNAi, a relatively recent technology for silencing genes in living cells and organisms, is still at an early stage, and we are aware of only four clinical tests of therapeutic applications using RNAi that have yet been initiated by any party. In addition to our work in RNAi and small molecule therapeutics, we recently announced that a novel HIV DNA + protein vaccine exclusively licensed to us and developed by researchers at the University of Massachusetts Medical School, or UMMS, and Advanced BioScience Laboratories, and funded by the National Institutes of Health, demonstrated promising interim Phase I clinical trial results that indicate its potential to produce potent antibody responses with neutralizing activity against multiple HIV viral strains. We have also entered into strategic alliances with respect to the development of several other products using our other technologies.
     On October 4, 2004, we acquired all of the clinical and pharmaceutical and related intellectual property assets of Biorex Research & Development, RT, or Biorex, a Hungary-based company focused on the development of novel small molecules based on molecular “chaperone” co-induction technology, with broad therapeutic applications in neurology, type 2 diabetes, cardiology and diabetic complications. The acquired assets include three oral, clinical stage drug candidates and a library of 500 small molecule drug candidates.technology. We recently entered the clinical stage of drug development with the initiation ofcompleted a Phase IIIIa clinical program withtrial of our lead small molecule product candidate, arimoclomol, for the treatment of ALS. Arimoclomol has received Orphan Drug and Fast Track designationamyotrophic lateral sclerosis, which is commonly known as ALS or Lou Gehrig’s disease. We plan to initiate a Phase IIb trial of arimoclomol for this indication during the second half of 2007, subject to clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. We also are pursuing clinical development of our other small molecule product candidates, as well as a novel HIV DNA + protein vaccine. We previously entered into strategic alliances with respect to the development of products using our other technologies.
     The initial Phase II clinical trialWe also are engaged in developing therapeutic products based upon ribonucleic acid interference, or RNAi, which has the potential to effectively treat a broad array of diseases by interfering with the expression of targeted disease-associated genes. In order to fully realize the potential value of our RNAi technologies, in January 2007 we transferred to RXi Pharmaceuticals Corporation, our majority-owned subsidiary, substantially all of our RNAi-related technologies and assets. RXi will focus solely on developing and commercializing therapeutic products based upon RNAi technologies for the treatment of human diseases, including neurodegenerative diseases, cancer, type 2 diabetes and obesity.
     We have relied primarily upon selling equity securities and upon proceeds received upon the exercise of options and warrants and, to a much lesser extent, upon payments from our strategic partners and licensees, to generate funds needed to finance our business and operations. At December 31, 2006, we had cash and cash equivalents of $30.4 million, and as of March 23, 2007, we had received approximately $11.0 million in connection with the exercise of warrants and options since December 31, 2006. We believe that we have initiatedadequate financial resources to support our currently planned level of operations into the first quarter of 2009, which expectation is based in part on projected expenditures for 2007 of: $6.5 million for our Phase IIb trial for arimoclomol for ALS (which we referand related studies, $3.9 million for our other ongoing and planned preclinical programs, $8.8 million for general and administrative expenses, and $1.6 million to as the Phase IIa trial) is a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled studyprovide interim funding for RXi’s first few months of operations. We estimate RXi will expend approximately 80 ALS patients enrolled at ten clinical centers across the U.S. Patients will receive either placebo (a capsule without drug), or one of three dose levels of arimoclomol capsules three times daily,$6.2 million on development activities for a period of 12 weeks. This treatment phase will be immediately followed by a one-month period without drug. The primary endpoints of this Phase IIa trial are safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints include a preliminary evaluation of efficacy using two widely accepted surrogate markers, the revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R), which is used to determine patients’ capacity and independence2007 (including approximately $400,000 in 13 functional activities, and Vital Capacity (VC), an assessment of lung capacity. The trial is powered to monitor only extreme responsespayments under agreements with UMMS, $3.2 million in these two categories. We recently announced initiation of an “open-label” (i.e.the medication is no longer blinded to the patients or their doctor) extension of this clinical trial. Patients who complete the Phase IIa study and who still meet the eligibility criteria may have the opportunity to take arimoclomol, at the highest investigative dose, for as long as an additional 6 months.
     Depending upon the results of the Phase IIa trial, we plan to initiate a subsequent Phase II trial (which we refer to as the Phase IIb trial) that will be powered to detect more subtle efficacy responses. Although this second trial is still in the planning stages and will be subject to FDA approval, it is expected to include approximately 300 ALS patients recruited from 25 clinical sites and will take approximately 18 months after initiation to complete.
     The acquisition of the molecular “chaperone” co-induction technology from Biorex represented a continuation of

26


our business strategy, adopted subsequent to our merger with Global Genomics, in July 2002, to conduct furtherother research and development effortsexpenses and $2.6 million in general and administrative expenses). If, in addition to the interim funding for our pre-merger adjuvantwhich we have already budgeted, we elect to provide RXi with all or a substantial portion of its initial funding for 2007 and co-polymer technologies, including Flocorbeyond in the coming few months, and Tranzfect, through strategic relationships with other pharmaceutical companies, andif we are unable to focus our efforts on acquiring and developing new technologies and products to serve as the foundation forraise funds in the future of the company.
     In April 2003,to replenish any amounts that we acquiredprovide to RXi, our first new technologies by entering into exclusive license agreements with UMMS covering potential applications for its proprietary RNAi technology in the treatment of specified diseases. In May 2003, we broadened our strategic alliance with UMMS by acquiring an exclusive license from it covering a proprietary DNA-based HIV vaccine technology. In July 2004, we further expanded our strategic alliance with UMMS by entering into a collaboration and invention disclosure agreement with UMMS under which UMMScurrent working capital will disclose to us certain new technologies developed at UMMS over a three-year period pertaining to RNAi, diabetes, obesity, neurodegenerative diseases (including ALS) and CMV, and will give us an option, upon making a specified payment, to negotiate an exclusive worldwide license to the disclosed technologies on commercially reasonable terms. Approximately one year remains on the technology disclosure option. As part of our strategic alliance with UMMS, we agreed to fund certain discovery and pre-clinical research at UMMS relating to the use of our technologies, licensed from UMMS, for the development of therapeutic products within certain fields.
be depleted accordingly. We have no significant revenuesrevenue, and we expect not to have no significant revenuesrevenue and to continue to incur significant losses over the next several years. Our net losses may increase from current levels primarily due to activitiesexpenses related to our collaborations, technology acquisitions, ongoing and planned clinical trials, research and development programs, possible technology acquisitions, and other general corporate activities. We anticipate, therefore, that our operating results will fluctuate for the foreseeable future. Therefore,future and period-to-period comparisons should not be relied upon as predictive of the results in future periods.

32


     To date,RXi Pharmaceuticals Corporation
     In addition to transferring to RXi our RNAi-related technologies and assets, we have relied primarily upon salesrecently entered into a number of equity securitiesagreements relating to RXi as described in Part I, Item 1, of this Annual Report under the caption “RXi Pharmaceuticals Corporation – Recent Developments,” which will affect our future financial condition and results of operations.
     On January 8, 2007, we entered into a letter agreement with RXi under which RXi has agreed to a much lesser extent, upon payments from our strategic partnersreimburse us, following its initial funding, for all organizational and licenseesoperational expenses incurred by us in connection with the formation, initial operations and upon proceeds received upon the exercisefunding of options and warrants,RXi. As of February 28, 2007, we had advanced approximately $592,000 to generate the funds needed to finance our business plans and operations. WeRXi for which it will be requiredobligated to obtain significant additionalreimburse us.
     We have agreed to reduce our share of ownership of RXi to less than a majority of the outstanding voting power as soon as reasonably practicable following RXi’s initial funding in the coming few months. In order to executereduce our long-termownership interest in RXi, we may seek to dispose of a portion of our RXi shares through a dividend or distribution of such shares to our stockholders, a sale or other disposition to one or more third parties, or other means. We have no agreement, understanding or arrangement with respect to the possible disposition of any of our RXi shares. Any proposed dividend or other distribution to our stockholders of RXi shares would be subject to SEC rules and the requirements of the Delaware General Corporation Law. We may be unable to comply with these rules and requirements, or may experience delays in complying. Any such dividend or distribution may be taxable to CytRx. There is no assurance that we will be able to satisfy our obligations to UMMS to reduce our ownership of RXi in a manner that would be advantageous to us or our stockholders.
     RXi began operating as a stand-alone company with its own management, business, plans. Our sourcesand operations in January 2007. Following RXi’s initial funding, we have agreed under our letter agreement with UMMS and our separate stockholders agreement with RXi and its other current stockholders to reduce our share of potential fundingownership of RXi to less than a majority of the outstanding voting power as soon as reasonably practicable. During the time that RXi is majority-owned, the consolidated financial statements of CytRx will include 100% of the assets and liabilities of RXi and the ownership of the interests of the minority shareholders will be recorded as “minority interests.” In the future, if CytRx owns more than 20% but less than 50% of the outstanding shares of RXi, CytRx would account for its investment in RXi using the next several years are expected to consist primarilyequity method. Under the equity method, CytRx would record its pro-rata share of proceeds from salesthe gains or losses of equity, but could also include license and other fees, fundedRXi against its historical basis investment in RXi. For 2007, we expect RXi’s research and development payments, giftsexpenses will be approximately $6.2 million, which, if RXi were to remain a consolidated subsidiary of CytRx, would result in an increase in our consolidated research and grants,development expenses and milestone payments under existing and future collaborative arrangements. However, we have no commitment or arrangements for such additional funding.a corresponding decrease in our consolidated cash position.
Research and Development
     Following our 2003 acquisition of rights to new technologies from UMMS and our 2004 acquisition of the clinical assets of Biorex, we initiated research and development programs for products based upon those technologies.     Expenditures for research and development activities related to continuing operations were $9.8 million, $9.1 million $9.0 million and $4.4$9.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 2004 and 2003,2004, respectively, with research and development expenses representing approximately 58%50%, 53%58% and 39%53% of our total expenses for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 2004 and 2003,2004, respectively. Included in research and development expenses for 2004 was $3.0 million of in-process research and development that was written off in conjunction with our acquisition of assets from Biorex. Research and development expenses are further discussed below under “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” and “Results of Operations.”
     We presently expect to incur expenses of approximately $6.5 million for our Phase II clinical program with arimoclomol for ALS during 2007, and an additional $10.3 million in 2008 and $10.0 million in 2009. The actual cost of our clinical program for ALS could differ significantly from our current projections due to any additional requirements imposed by the FDA in connection with our planned Phase IIb trial, or if actual costs are higher than current management estimates for other reasons. In the event that actual costs of our clinical program for ALS, or any of our other ongoing research activities, are significantly higher than our current estimates, we may be required to significantly modify our planned level of operations.

33


There is a risk that any drug discovery and development program may not produce revenue because of the risks inherent in drug discovery and development. Moreover, there are uncertainties specific to any new field of drug discovery, including our molecular chaperone co-induction technology or RNAi.and RXi’s RNAi-related technologies. The successful development of any product candidate we develop is highly uncertain. We cannot reasonably estimate or know the nature, timing and costs of the efforts necessary to complete the development of, or the period in which material net cash inflows are expected to commence from any product candidate, due to the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with developing drugs, including the uncertainty of:
Our ability to advance product candidates into pre-clinical and clinical trials.

27


  Theour ability to advance product candidates into pre-clinical and clinical trials;
the scope, rate and progress of our pre-clinical trials and other research and development activities.activities;
 
  Thethe scope, rate of progress and cost of any clinical trials we commence.commence;
 
  Thethe cost of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing any patent claims and other intellectual property rights.rights;
 
  Futurefuture clinical trial results.results;
 
  Thethe terms and timing of any collaborative, licensing and other arrangements that we may establish.establish;
 
  Thethe cost and timing of regulatory approvals.approvals;
 
  Thethe cost and timing of establishing sales, marketing and distribution capabilities.capabilities;
 
  Thethe cost of establishing clinical and commercial supplies of our product candidates and any products that we may develop.develop; and
 
  Thethe effect of competing technological and market developments.
     Any failure to complete any stage of the development of our products in a timely manner could have a material adverse effect on our operations, financial position and liquidity. A discussion of the risks and uncertainties associated with completing our projects on schedule, or at all, and the potential consequences of failing to do so, arebusiness is set forth in the “Risk Factors” section of this Annual Report.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
     Management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, bad debts, impairment of long-lived assets, including finite lived intangible assets, accrued liabilities and certain expenses. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
     Our significant accounting policies are summarized in Note 2 of the Notes to our audited financial statements.Financial Statements included in this Annual Report. We believe the following critical accounting policies affectare affected by our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:

34


Revenue Recognition
     Nonrefundable license fee revenue is recognized when collectibility is reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt, when no continuing involvement on our part is required and payment of the license fee represents the culmination of the earnings process. Nonrefundable license fees received subject to future performance by us, or that are credited against future payments due to us are deferred and recognized as services are performed and collectibility is reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt, or upon termination of the agreement and all related obligations thereunder, whichever is earlier. Our revenue recognition policy may require us in the future to defer significant amounts of revenue.

28

     In August 2006, we received approximately $24.5 million in marketable securities (which were sold by us for approximately $24.3 million in cash) from the privately-funded ALS Charitable Remainder Trust (ALSCRT) in exchange for the commitment to continue research and development of arimoclomol and other potential treatments for ALS and a one-percent royalty in the worldwide sales of arimoclomol. Under the arrangement, we retain the rights to any products or intellectual property funded by the arrangement and the proceeds of the transaction are non-refundable. Further, the ALSCRT has no obligation to provide any further funding to us. We have analyzed the transaction and concluded that, due to the research and development components of the transaction, it is properly accounted for under SFAS No. 68,Research and Development Arrangements. Accordingly, we have recorded the value received under the arrangement as deferred service revenue and will recognize service revenue using the proportional performance method of revenue recognition, meaning that service revenue is recognized on a dollar for dollar basis for each dollar of expense incurred for the research and development of arimoclomol and then the development of other potential ALS treatments. We believe that this method best approximates the efforts expended related to the services provided. We adjust our estimates quarterly as better information becomes available. As of December 31, 2006, we recognized approximately $1.8 million of service revenue related to this transaction.


     We adjust our estimates of ALS-related research and development costs incurred on a quarterly basis. Any significant change in ALS-related research and development expense in any particular quarterly or annual period will result in a change in the recognition of revenue for that period and consequently affect the comparability or revenue from period to period.
     Research and Development Expenses
     Research and development expenses consist of costs incurred for direct and overhead-related research expenses and are expensed as incurred. CostsResearch and development expenses include costs to acquire technologies which are utilized in research and development and which have no alternative future use are expensed when incurred. Technologyuse. Until technological feasibility has been established, technology developed for use in our products also is expensed as incurred, until technological feasibility has been established. Expenditures, to date, have been classified as research and development expense in the consolidated statements of operations and we expect to continue to expense research and development for the foreseeable future.incurred.
     Clinical Trial Expenses
     Clinical trial expenses, which are included in research and development expenses, include obligations resulting from our contracts with various clinical research organizations in connection with conducting clinical trials for our product candidates. We recognize expenses for these activities based on a variety of factors, including actual and estimated labor hours, clinical site initiation activities, patient enrollment rates, estimates of external costs and other activity-based factors. We believe that this method best approximates the efforts expended on a clinical trial with the expenses we record. We adjust our rate of clinical expense recognition if actual results differ from our estimates.
     Stock-basedShare-based Compensation
     Our share-based employee compensation plans are described in Note 13 of the Notes to our Financial Statements. On January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS 123(R), “Accounting for Stock-based Compensation, revised 2004” (“123(R)”), which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees, non-employee directors, and consultants, including employee

35


stock options. SFAS 123(R) differs from our previous accounting under APB 25 and SFAS 123 for periods prior to January 2006. In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 107, “Share-Based Payment,” relating to SFAS 123(R). We applyhave applied the provisions of SAB 107 in our adoption of SFAS 123(R).
     Our Statement of Operations as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 reflects the impact of SFAS 123(R). In accordance with the modified prospective transition method, our results of operations for prior periods have not been restated to reflect the impact of SFAS 123(R). Share-based compensation expense recognized under SFAS 123(R) for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $1.2 million. As of December 31, 2006, there was $952,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding options that is expected to be recognized as a component of our operating expenses through 2009. Compensation costs will be adjusted for future changes in estimated forfeitures.
     The fair value of each option grant is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, with the following weighted average assumptions used for grants in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively: risk-free interest rates of 4.9%, 4.1% and 3.7%, respectively; expected volatility of 111.6%, 109.0% and 117.0%, respectively; expected life of the options of 6.0 years, 8.0 years and 8.0 years, respectively; and no dividends made in any year. Based on historical experience, for 2006, we estimated an annualized forfeiture rate of 10% for options granted to employees and 3% for options granted to senior management and directors. For 2005 and 2004, we accounted for forfeitures on an as-occurred basis. Any change in actual forfeitures from our historical experience could result in an adjustment of our forfeiture estimate and a corresponding change in the amount of compensation expenses recorded in any single quarterly or annual period. The weighted average fair value of stock options granted during 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $1.11, $0.95 and $1.73, respectively.
     Prior to January 1, 2006, we accounted for share-based compensation under the recognition and measurement provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, (“APB 25”),Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (“APB 25”), and related interpretations in accounting for our stock-based employee compensation plans, rather than the alternative fair value accounting method provided for under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation(“SFAS 123”). In the Notesall awards granted to Consolidated Financial Statements, we provide pro forma disclosures in accordance with SFAS 123 and related pronouncements.employees. Under APB 25, compensation expense is recordedwhen the exercise price of options granted to employees under these plans equals or exceeds the market price of the common stock on the date of grant, no compensation expense is recorded. When the exercise price of an optionoptions granted to an employee or memberemployees under these plans is less than the market price of the Board only if the fair market value of the underlyingcommon stock aton the date of grant, exceeds the exercise price. In addition, we have granted options to certain outside consultants, which are required to be measured at fair value and recognized as compensation expense in our financial statements. We apply the Black-Scholes option-pricing model for estimating the fair value of options, which involves a number of judgments and variables, including estimates of the life of the options and expected volatility which are subject to significant change. A change in the fair value estimate could have a significant effect on the amount of pro forma compensation expense calculated.
          In December 2004, the FASB released its revised standard, SFAS No. 123(R) (SFAS 123(R)”), “Share-Based Payment.” SFAS 123(R) requires that a public entity measure the cost of equity-based service awards based on the fair value of the award on the date of grant. That cost will beis recognized over either the vesting period or the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. We are required to adopt the provisions of SFAS 123(R) for periods after January 2006, and we will adopt the new requirements using the modified prospective transition method. The adoption of SFAS 123(R) requires us to value stock options granted prior to adoption of SFAS 123(R) under the fair value method and expense these amounts in the income statement over the stock option’s remaining vesting period. The adoption of SFAS 123(R) will result in recognition of additional non-cash stock-based compensation expense and, accordingly, will increase net losses in amounts which likely will be considered material, although it will not impact our cash position.
     We account for equity instruments issued to non-employees in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123123(R) and Emerging Issues Task Force Issue (“EITF”) No. 96-18,Accounting for Equity Instruments that Are Issued to other than Employees for Acquiring, or in conjunction with Selling Goods, or Services,(“ EITF 96-18”) which require that such equity instruments arebe recorded at their fair value on the measurement date. The measurement of stock-basedshare-based compensation generally is subject to periodic adjustment as the underlying equity instruments vest. Non-employee stock-basedshare-based compensation charges generally are amortized over the vesting period on a straight-line basis. In certain circumstances, however, option grants to non-employees are immediately vested and are therefore recorded as an expense if the service has been provided, or capitalized as a prepaid asset and amortized over the period of service if the services has not been provided as of the vesting date. Additionally, in our estimates, we consider the achievement of performance by non-employee service providers at the grant date.
     We have adopted the simplified method provided in SFAS 123(R) to use for calculating the beginning balance of the additional paid in capital pool, or APIC pool, related to the tax effects of employee stock-based compensation, and to determine the subsequent impact on the APIC pool and Statement of Cash Flows of the tax effects of employee stock-based compensation awards that are outstanding upon adoption of SFAS 123(R). We have not recognized excess tax benefits related to employee stock-based compensation and, therefore, do not currently have an APIC pool.
     In December 2006, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position EITF 00-19-2,Accounting for Registration Payment Arrangements(“FSP 00-19-2”). FSP 00-19-2 specifies that the contingent obligation to make future payments or otherwise transfer consideration under a registration payment arrangement, whether issued as a separate agreement or included as a provision of a financial instrument or other agreement, should be

2936


separately recognized and measured in accordance with FASB Statement No. 5,Accounting for Contingencies. For registration payment arrangements and financial instruments subject to those arrangements that were entered into prior to the issuance of EITF 00-19-2, this guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. We have elected to reflect early adoption of FSP 00-19-2 in our 2006 financial statements, and the adoption did not have an effect on our financial statements. In adopting FSP 00-19-2, we concluded that it was not probably that we would be required to pay any penalties under the existing registration rights agreements entered into in January 2005 and March 2006.
     Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
     We review long-lived assets, including finite lived intangible assets, for impairment on an annual basis, as of December 31, or on an interim basis if an event occurs that might reduce the fair value of such assets below their carrying values. An impairment loss would be recognized based on the difference between the carrying value of the asset and its estimated fair value, which would be determined based on either discounted future cash flows or other appropriate fair value methods.
Earnings Per Share
     Basic and diluted loss per common share are computed based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Common share equivalents (which consist of options and warrants) are excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share since the effect would be antidilutive. Common share equivalents which could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future, and which were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share, totaled approximately 30.2 million shares, 24.7 million shares and 14.5 million shares at December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. In accordanceconnection with our adjustment to the provisionsexercise terms of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 18,The Equity Methodcertain outstanding warrants to purchase common stock on March 2, 2006 and January 20, 2005, we recorded deemed dividends of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock(APB 18), we reviewed the net values on our balance sheet, as of September 30, 2003, assigned to Investment in Minority — Owned Entity — Acquired Developed Technology resulting from our acquisition of Blizzard Research$488,000 and Development Company, or Blizzard. Blizzard was recorded$1.1 million, respectively. These deemed dividends are reflected as an acquired development-stage company and there was an external valuation usedadjustment to net loss for substantiationthe first quarter of the value of the technology2006 and the investment, which was preparedyear ended 2005, as ofrestated, to arrive at net loss applicable to common stockholders on the dateconsolidated statement of the announcement of the transaction February 11, 2002. For our annual audit of fiscal 2002, potential impairment was addressed and the valuation was updated internally using similar methods used for the original investment. Based upon our analysis there was no impairment. Our auditors for that fiscal year concurred. We continued to measure impairment through these methods on a quarterly basis and through the second quarter of 2003, we continued to believe that Blizzard’s proprietary technology was commercially viable, subject to its ability to obtain significant financing. At that time we believed there was no impairment. APB 18 requires that a loss in value of an investment, which is other than a temporary decline, should be recognized as an impairment loss. Through the third quarter of 2003, Blizzard had been unsuccessful in its attempts to raise a significant amount of financing necessary for it to pursue its commercialization strategy for its products and we subsequently decided not to further invest in this entity. We believe that Blizzard was unable to obtain substantial third-party financing primarily because (1) the genomics market, which the Blizzard technology was targeting, had begun to decline in 2003, (2) Blizzard had not completed a production unit of its principal product for testing by potential investors, and (3) certain investors were unwilling to invest without a simultaneous infusion of additional capital from us as Blizzard’s 40% shareholder, and we were unable to reach satisfactory terms for such financing. Our analysis consisted of a review of the financial projections prepared by Blizzard, application of a discounted cash flow valuation model of Blizzard’s projected cash flows, and consideration of other qualitative factors such as Blizzard’s termination of its employees, its office lease and its engagement of its investment banker. Based upon the quantitative and qualitative factors described above, in addition to others, our management determined that the estimated fair value of our investment in Blizzard was $0 and that an impairment charge of $5.9 million was necessary. In considering the timing of the write-off, we looked to Blizzard’s termination of its employees, lease and investment banker in October 2003 as affirmation of conditions that existed at September 2003, and therefore recorded the write-off in the third quarter of 2003. The write-off had no impact upon our cash or working capital position. It is our understanding that, by the end of 2003, Blizzard had ceased operations and in 2004, returned its licensed intellectual property to the Minnesota Research Fund.for purposes of calculating basic and diluted earnings per shares.
Estimated Facility Abandonment Accrual
          Subsequent to our merger with Global Genomics in 2002, we recorded a loss of $563,000 associated with the closure of our Atlanta headquarters and our relocation to Los Angeles. This loss represented the total remaining lease obligations and estimated operating costs through the remainder of the lease term, less estimated sublease rental income and deferred rent at the time. In August 2005, we entered into a lease termination agreement pursuant to which we were released from all future obligations on the lease in exchange for a one-time $110,000 payment and the forfeiture of a $49,000 security deposit. As a result of this agreement, we realized a $164,000 offset against third quarter general and administrative expenses.
Quarterly Financial Data
     The following table sets forth unaudited statement of operations data for each quarter during our most recent two completed fiscal years. This quarterly information has been derived from our unaudited financial statements and, in the opinion of management, includes all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the information for the periods covered. The quarterly financial data should be read in conjunction

30


with our financial statements and related notes. The operating results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for any future period.
                                
 Quarter Ended 
 March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31 
 (In thousands, except per share data) 
 (restated) 
2006
   
Total revenues $61 $ $776 $1,229 
Net loss  (4,166)  (5,465)  (2,972)  (4,148)
Deemed dividend for anti-dilution adjustments made to outstanding common stock warrants  (488)    
         
Net loss applicable to common stockholders $(4,654) $(5,465) $(2,972) $(4,148)
         
Basic and diluted loss per share applicable to common stock $(0.07) $(0.08) $(0.04) $(0.06)
 Quarter Ended         
 March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31 
 (In thousands, except per share data) (restated) 
2005
    
Total revenues $1 $ $10 $173  $1 $ $10 $173 
Net loss  (3,527)  (4,509)  (3,492)  (3,565)  (3,527)  (4,509)  (3,492)  (3,565)
Basic and diluted loss per common share: 
Net loss $(0.07) $(0.08) $(0.06) $(0.06)
2004
 
Total revenues $100 $228 $ $100 
Net loss  (3,774)  (4,061)  (2,796)  (5,761)
Basic and diluted loss per common share: 
Net loss $(0.11) $(0.12) $(0.08) $(0.15)
Deemed dividend for anti-dilution adjustments made to outstanding common stock warrants  (1,076)    
         
Net loss applicable to common stockholders $(4,603) $(4,509) $(3,492) $(3,565)
         
Basic and diluted loss per share applicable to common stock $(0.09) $(0.08) $(0.06) $(0.06)
         

37


     Quarterly and year to dateyearly loss per share amounts are computed independently of each other. Therefore, the sum of the per share amounts for the quarters may not agree toequal the per share amounts for the year. In 2006, we adopted SFAS 123(R), and incurred $1.2 million in employee non-cash compensation expense. No corresponding expenses were recorded in 2005 or 2004.
     In connection with our adjustment to the exercise terms of certain outstanding warrants to purchase common stock on March 2, 2006 and January 20, 2005, we recorded deemed dividends of $488,000 and $1.1 million, respectively. These deemed dividends are reflected as an adjustment to net loss for the first quarter of 2006 and the year ended 2005, as restated, to arrive at net loss applicable to common stockholders on the consolidated statement of operations and for purposes of calculating basic and diluted earnings per shares. Our quarterly financial data has been restated to reflect the impact of the deemed dividend upon the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
     General
At December 31, 2005,2006, we had cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments of $8.3$30.4 million and total assets of $9.9$31.6 million compared to $3.0$8.3 million and $5.0$9.9 million, respectively, at December 31, 2004. Working2005. Our working capital totaled $20.3 million at December 31, 2006, compared to $6.3 million at December 31, 2005, compared to $1.2 million at December 31, 2004.2005.
     To date, weWe have relied primarily upon sales ofselling equity securities and, to a much lesser extent, payments from our strategic partners and licensees and upon proceeds received upon the exercise of options and warrants and, to a much lesser extent, upon payments from our strategic partners and licensees, to generate funds needed to finance our business and operations. As a result of March 23, 2007, we also had received approximately $11.0 million in connection with the $12.4 million equity financing, netexercise of expenses, that we completed in March 2006, wewarrants and options since December 31, 2006. We believe that we have adequate working capitalfinancial resources to support our currently planned level of operations into the thirdfirst quarter of 2009, which expectation is based in part on projected expenditures for 2007 including our current and planned clinical trials for arimoclomol, drug discovery efforts related to additional product candidates, working capital and general corporate purposes. Included in our planned expenses are approximately $3.2of: $6.5 million for our Phase II clinical program withIIb trial for arimoclomol for ALS during 2006, and an additional $4.5related studies, $3.9 million in 2007 and $6.3 million in 2008. The cost of our clinical program for ALS could vary significantly from our current projections due to any additional requirements imposed by the FDA in connection with the ongoing Phase IIa trial, or in connection with our planned Phase IIb trial, or if actual costs are higher than current management estimates for other reasons. In the event that actual costs of our clinical program for ALS, or any of our other ongoing and planned preclinical programs, $8.8 million for general and administrative expenses, and $1.6 million to provide interim funding for RXi’s first few months of operations. We estimate RXi will expend approximately $6.2 million on development activities for 2007 (including approximately $400,000 in payments under agreements with UMMS, $3.2 million in other research activities,and development expenses and $2.6 million in general and administrative expenses). If, in addition to the interim funding for which we have already budgeted, we elect to provide RXi with all or a substantial portion of its initial funding for 2007 and beyond in the coming few months, and if we are significantly higher thanunable to raise funds in the future to replenish any amounts that we provide to RXi, our current estimates, we mayworking capital will be requireddepleted accordingly. We anticipate it will take a minimum of three years and possibly longer for us to significantly modify our planned level of operations. In the future,generate recurring revenue, and we will be dependent on obtaining future financing from third parties in order to maintain our operations, including our Phase II clinical program with arimoclomol for ALS, our planned levels of operations for our obesity and type 2 diabetes research laboratory and our ongoing research and development efforts related to our other small molecule drug candidates, and in order to continue to meet our obligations to UMMS.until such time, if ever, as we can generate significant recurring revenue. We currently have no commitments from any third parties to provide us with capital. We cannot assure thatany additional funding willfuture financing, and may not be availableable to usobtain future financing on favorable terms, or at all. If
RXi Initial Funding Requirements
     UMMS may terminate the 2007 UMMS licenses and the new UMMS invention disclosure agreement with RXi will not become effective unless RXi achieves a funding milestone in the coming few months. We are not obligated to provide RXi with any of the initial funding, and neither CytRx nor RXi has any commitment or agreement from any source to provide funding to RXi. No assurance can be given that RXi will, in fact, receive initial funding. In the event that RXi does not receive the initial funding either from CytRx or one or more third parties in the coming few months, UMMS will be entitled to terminate the 2007 UMMS licenses and the new UMMS invention disclosure agreement will not become effective. The loss of

38


the 2007 UMMS licenses and new UMMS invention disclosure agreement could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock. In that event, RXi’s ability to develop the RNAi technologies that we failcontributed to obtain additional funding when needed,RXi also could be materially and adversely affected.
     In our letter agreement with UMMS and our separate stockholders agreement with RXi and its other current stockholders, we have agreed to reduce our share of ownership of RXi to less than a majority of the outstanding voting power as soon as reasonably practicable following RXi’s receipt of initial funding. In order to reduce our ownership interest in RXi, we may seek to dispose of a portion of our RXi shares through a dividend or distribution of such shares to our stockholders, a sale or other disposition to one or more third parties, or other means. We have no agreement, understanding or arrangement with respect to the possible disposition of any of our RXi shares. Any proposed dividend or other distribution to our stockholders of RXi shares would be forcedsubject to scale back, or terminate, our operations, or to seek to merge with or to be acquired by another company.
     For the year ended December 31, 2005, net cash provided by investing activities consisted of $964,000, of which $1.0 million was from the redemption of short-term securities, which was partially offset by the acquisition of $48,000 of property and equipment. We expect capital spending to increase during 2006 over our 2005 levels to support our increasing research and development effortsSEC rules and the implementationrequirements of Sarbanes-Oxley. In the year ended December 31, 2004, net cash usedDelaware General Corporation Law. We may be unable to comply with these rules and requirements, or may experience delays in investing activities consistedcomplying. Any such dividend or distribution may be taxable to CytRx, and would likely be taxable to our stockholders. There is no assurance that we will be able to satisfy our obligations to UMMS to reduce our ownership of $962,000 for the purchaseRXi in a manner that would be advantageous to us or our stockholders.
Discussion of securities to be held to maturity2006 Activities and $772,000 for property and equipment, which includes $447,000 related to assets acquired in connection with the molecular library assets of Biorex.Future Capital Requirements
     Net cash provided by investing activitiesloss for the year ended December 31, 20032006 was $1.2$16.8 million, which was primarily due to the maturity of held-to-maturity investments acquired in 2002.

31


     Cashand cash provided by financingfrom operating activities for the year-ended December 31, 2005that period was $19.8$9.4 million.
     The $9.4 million in cash provided from operating activities includes $256,000net proceeds of $24.3 million received uponfrom the exercise of stock options and warrants. Additionally, we raised $19.6 million throughALS Charitable Remainder Trust in August 2006 in connection with the sale of equity,a one-percent royalty interest in our worldwide sales of which $19.4arimoclomol for ALS. Included in the net loss of $16.8 million was raisedis the $1.8 million of revenue recognized in 2006 in connection with that sale. The remaining $22.5 million of the net proceeds from that sale were recorded as deferred revenues. Other non-cash items included in our net loss necessary to reconcile cash provided from operating activities include a private equity financing, net change in assets and liabilities of $1.4 million, $1.7 million in stock option expense related to options granted to employees and consultants, $263,000 related to the issuance of stock pursuant to a license agreement with UMMS, $228,000 of depreciation and amortization expense and $3,000 of retirements. Included in the $1.7 million in stock option expense related to options granted to employees and consultants is $1.2 million of expenses that closedfor employee options recorded under SFAS 123(R), which we adopted in January 2005. Net cash provided by financing activities2006, and accordingly no corresponding amount was recorded in the year ended December 31, 2004 was $4.4 million. The cash provided was the result of $526,000 received upon the exercise of stock options and warrants and the $4.0 million private equity financing completed in October 2004. Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $14.4 million. In May and September 2003, we completed private equity financings raising net proceeds of $4.9 million and $7.7 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2003, we also received proceeds from the exercise of stock options and warrants totaling $1.9 million.earlier periods.
     Our net loss for the year-endedyear ended December 31, 2005 was $15.1 million, which resulted in net cash used in operating activities of $14.5 million. Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities for the year-endedyear ended December 31, 2005 includewere primarily $586,000 of common stock option expense related to options and warrants issued in lieu of cash for research and development and general and administrative services,granted to consultants, as well as a net change in assets and liabilities of $210,000 offset by the recording of $217,000 in depreciation and amortization.
     Our net loss for the year ended December 31, 2004 was $16.4 million, which includes the write-off of $3.0 million of in-process research and development related to the acquisition of assets from Biorex. The $16.4 million loss resulted in net cash used in operating activities of $12.4 million. Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2004 were primarily $873,000 of common stock, options and warrants issued in lieu of cash for general and administrative services. Additionally, we issued $388,000 of common stock, options and warrants in lieu of cash in connection with certain license fees and $1.0 million in connection with research and development activities. Our net loss for the year-ended December 31, 2003 was $17.8 million, which resulted in net cash used in operating activities of $4.3 million. Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2003 were primarily $6.7 million of losses from a minority-owned entity, $1.5 million$1,977,000 of common stock, options and warrants issued in lieu of cash for general and administrative services, $1.8 millionas well as a net change in assets and liabilities of $570,000 and depreciation of $104,000. Additionally, we issued $388,000 of common stock issuedin lieu of cash in connection with certain license agreementsfees and $1.1$1.0 million of common stock issued in connection with research and development activities, as well as a net change.
     For the year ended December 31, 2006, only a small amount of cash was used in investing activities. For the year ended December 31, 2005, the only significant investing activity was the redemption of an approximately $1.0 million certificate of deposit. Other investing activities consisted primarily of the purchase of small amounts of computers and laboratory equipment. We expect capital spending to increase during 2007 over our 2006 levels to support our increasing research and development efforts. In the year ended December

39


31, 2004, net cash used in investing activities consisted of $962,000 for the purchase of securities to be held to maturity and $772,000 for property and equipment, which includes $447,000 related to assets acquired in connection with the molecular library assets of Biorex.
     Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $12.8 million compared to $19.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2005. During 2006, we raised $12.4 million through the sale of common stock and an additional $359,000 as a result of the exercise of stock options and warrants. The decrease in cash provided from financing activities of $7.0 million is due to a greater amount of cash being raised from the issuance of common stock in the year ended December 31, 2005. During the year ended December 31, 2005, we raised $19.6 million through the sale of common stock. Net cash provided by financing activities in the year ended December 31, 2004 was $4.4 million. The cash provided was the result of $526,000 received upon the exercise of stock options and warrants and the $3.9 million private equity financing completed in October 2004.
     We believe that we have adequate working capital to allow us to operate at our currently planned levels into the thirdsecond quarter of 2007. Our strategic alliance with UMMS may require us to make significant2009. We estimate RXi’s expenditures to fund research at UMMS relating to developing therapeutic products based on UMMS’s proprietary gene silencing technology that has been licensed to us. The aggregate amount of these expenditures was approximately $2.5 million during 2005, and if we retain our current license portfolio, we expect expenditures tofor 2007 will be approximately $1.2 million during 2006.$5.1 million.
     We willmay require significant additional capital in order to fund the completion of our Phase II clinical program with our lead small molecule product candidatefor arimoclomol for the treatment of ALS, which commenced in September 2005, and the other ongoing research and development related to the drug candidates acquired from Biorex in October 2004. We spent $3.8$5.0 million on the arimoclomol clinical program in 2005,2006, and we estimate that the overall program, including the ongoing Phase IIa trialstudies and the planned Phase IIb trial that we expect to initiate soon after completionin the second half of the present Phase IIa trial2007, subject to clearance from the FDA, approval, will require us to expend an additional $26.8 million. We expect to incur expenses of approximately $3.2$6.5 million in 2006,2007, and an additional $10.8$20.3 million thereafter over the following 12 to 18 months.months of the program. However, we may incur substantial additional expense and the trial may be delayed if the FDA requires us to generate additional pre-clinical or clinical data in connection with the clinical trial, or the FDA requires us to revise significantly our planned protocol for the Phase IIb.
     Any additional capital may be provided by potential milestones payments pursuant to our licenses with Merck and Vical, both of which relate to Tranzfect, or our license with SynthRx related to Flocor, or by potential payments from future strategic alliance partners or licensees of our technologies. However, Merck is at an early stage of clinical trials of a product utilizing TransFect and Vical has only recently commenced a Phase IIa clinical trial of a product using TransFect, so there is likely to be a substantial period of time, if ever, before we receive any further significant payments from Merck or Vical.

32


We intend also to pursue other sources of capital, although we do not currently have commitments from any third parties to provide us with capital. The results of our technology licensing efforts and the actual proceeds of any fund-raising activities will determine our ongoing ability to operate as a going concern. Our ability to obtain future financings through joint ventures, product licensing arrangements, equity financings, gifts, and grants or otherwise is subject to market conditions and out ability to identify parties that are willing and able to enter into such arrangements on terms that are satisfactory to us. Depending upon the outcome of our fundraising efforts, the accompanying financial information may not necessarily be indicative of future operating results or future financial condition.
     We expect to incur significant losses for the foreseeable future and there can be no assurance that we will become profitable. Even if we become profitable, we may not be able to sustain that profitability.
     Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
     We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have a material current effect or that are reasonably likely to have a material future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources.
Contractual Obligations
     We acquire assets still in development and enter into research and development arrangements with third parties that often require milestone and royalty payments to the third party contingent upon the occurrence of certain future events linked to the success of the asset in development. Milestone payments may be required, contingent upon the successful achievement of an important point in the development life-cycle of the pharmaceutical product (e.g., approval of the product for marketing by a regulatory agency). If required by the arrangement, we may have no current commitmentsto make royalty payments based upon a percentage of the sales of the pharmaceutical product in the event that regulatory approval for capital expendituresmarketing is obtained. Because of the contingent nature of these payments, they are not included in 2006;the table of contractual obligations.

40


     These arrangements may be material individually, and in the unlikely event that milestones for multiple products covered by these arrangements were reached in the same period, the aggregate charge to expense could be material to the results of operations in any one period. In addition, these arrangements often give us the discretion to unilaterally terminate development of the product, which would allow us to avoid making the contingent payments; however, we anticipate incurring capital expenditures in connection withare unlikely to cease development if the expansioncompound successfully achieves clinical testing objectives. We also note that, from a business perspective, we view these payments as positive because they signify that the product is successfully moving through development and is now generating or is more likely to generate cash flows from sales of our laboratory. As of December 31, 2005, we had no committed lines of credit or other committed funding or long-term debt. As of December 31, 2005, minimum annualproducts.
     Our current contractual obligations that will require future obligations for operating leases, minimum annual future obligations under various license agreements and minimum annual future obligations under employment agreements consist of the following:cash payments are as follows:
                                            
 Operating License Employment    Non-Cancelable Cancelable   
 Leases Agreements Agreements Total  Operating Employment Research and License     
 (In thousands)  Leases Agreements Subtotal Development Agreements Subtotal   
2006 $507 $971 $1,264 $2,742 
 (In thousands) 
 (1) (2) (3) (4) Total 
             
2007 389 235 887 1,511  $534 $1,735   $2,269 $5,583 $1,267   $6,850 $9,119 
2008 108 339 590 1,037  138 876   1,014 7,424 332   7,756 8,770 
2009 1 339  340  26 490   516 914 332   1,246 1,762 
2010 and thereafter 2 1070  1,072 
2010 10 240   250  282   282 532 
2011 and thereafter 5 120   125  7,455   7,455 7,580 
                      
Total $1,007 $2,954 $2,741 $6,702  $713 $3,461   $4,174 $13,921 $9,668   $23,589 $27,763 
                      
          We have employment agreements with our executive officers, the terms of which expire at various times through July 2008. Certain agreements provide for minimum salary levels, which are subject to increase annually in the Compensation Committee’s discretion, as well as for minimum annual bonuses. The reported commitment for employment agreements includes, among other things, a total of $0.9 million of compensation payable to members of our Scientific Advisory Board through 2008, and a total of $1.6 million of minimum salary and guaranteed bonuses payable to our executives.
(1)Operating leases are primarily facility lease related obligations, as well as equipment and software lease obligations with third party vendors.
(2)Employment agreement obligations include management contracts, as well as scientific advisory board member compensation agreements.
(3)Research and development obligations relate primarily to our Phase IIb clinical trial for arimoclomol for ALS. Most of these purchase obligations are cancelable.
(4)License agreements generally relate to our obligations for licenses with UMMS associated with RNAi, which we are developing through our majority-owned RXi subsidiary. Included in the 2007 license obligations is an $800,000 payment that may be made in cash or common stock of RXi to UMMS. We anticipate making that payment in common stock of RXi following RXi’s initial funding.
     License and Collaboration Agreements
     In April 2003,May 2006, we acquired new technologiesexpanded our relationship with UMMS by entering into exclusivea new co-exclusive license arrangements with UMMS covering potential applicationsagreement related to a patent application for chemical modifications of the medical institution’s proprietary RNAi technology in the treatment of specified diseases, including those within the areas of obesity, type 2 diabetes ALS and CMV.invented by Tariq M. Rana, Ph.D. In consideration of the licenses,that license, we made a cash payments to UMMS totaling $186,000payment of $75,000 and, in December 2006, issued it a total of 1,613,258150,000 shares of our common stock which were valued, for financial statement purposes, at $1.5 million.approximately $263,000.
     On January 8, 2007, we entered into a Contribution Agreement with RXi under which we assigned and contributed to RXi substantially all of our RNAi-related technologies and assets, including the license described above. The assigned assets consisted primarily of our licenses from UMMS and from the Carnegie Institution of Washington relating to fundamental RNAi technologies, as well as equipment situated at our Worcester, Massachusetts, laboratory. The licensed technologies include patent applications on RNAi target sequences, chemical modifications and delivery to cells, field-specific licenses to a patent application on chemical modification of RNAi, the “Tuschl I” patent, and our exclusive licenses to patent applications that

41


disclose gene targets for diabetes and obesity, including RIP140 (see, “Material Licenses and Other Agreements,” below). In May 2003,connection with the contribution of the licenses and other assets, RXi assumed primary responsibility for all payments to UMMS and other obligations under the contributed licenses and assets.
     In addition to the RNAi licenses and rights that we broadened our strategic alliancecontributed to RXi, on January 10, 2007, RXi entered into three exclusive, worldwide, sublicenseable licenses with UMMS by acquiringfor three different patent families and one non-exclusive, worldwide, non-sublicensable license for a fourth patent family, which we refer to collectively as the “2007 UMMS licenses,” pursuant to which UMMS granted RXi rights under certain UMMS patent applications to make, use and sell products related to applications of RNAi technologies. The 2007 UMMS licenses include an exclusive license covering nanotransporters, which may be effective in the delivery of RNAi compounds, as well as methods and potential compounds for the potential treatment of ALS that can be delivered locally to the central nervous system.
     As consideration for the 2007 UMMS licenses, we paid UMMS an aggregate up-front fee of $75,000 and reimbursed UMMS $103,000 for previously incurred patent expenses. RXi also agreed under the 2007 UMMS licenses to undertake to complete an initial funding of RXi in the coming few months. Upon the completion of RXi’s initial funding, RXi will be obligated to pay UMMS an additional license fee of $175,000 and issue to UMMS an aggregate of $1,600,000 of RXi common stock that is to be valued on a per share basis for this purpose based on the valuation of RXi in its initial funding.
     The foregoing license agreements with UMMS require us to make aggregate payments of up to $300,000 in 2007. In subsequent periods, we will be required to make aggregate payments ranging from that institution covering a proprietary DNA-based HIV vaccine technology. In consideration$250,000 to $1.7 million per year to maintain the licenses. We are obligated to pay legal expenses for the prosecution of this license,patents licensed from UMMS, which we made cashanticipate will be approximately $175,000 during 2007, and to make milestone payments to UMMS totaling $18,000based upon our progress in the clinical development and issued it 215,101 sharesmarketing of our common stock whichproducts utilizing the technologies licensed from UMMS. In the event that we were valued, for financial statement purposes, at $361,000. In July 2004,to successfully develop a product in each of the categories of obesity/type 2 diabetes and ALS, these milestone payments could aggregate up to $27.4 million. We also would be required to pay royalties to UMMS based on the net sales of those products. The actual milestone payments will vary, perhaps significantly, based upon the milestones we further expanded our strategic alliance with UMMS by enteringachieve and the products, if any, we develop.
     On January 10, 2007, RXi also entered into a collaboration andan invention disclosure agreement with UMMS underpursuant to which UMMS will disclose to us certain new technologies developed at UMMS overis obligated for a three-year period pertaining to disclose to RXi any unrestricted inventions conceived or reduced to practice by UMMS related to therapeutic applications of RNAi diabetes, obesity, neurodegenerative diseases (including ALS)technologies. Upon completion of RXi’s initial funding, RXi will be obligated to pay UMMS $100,000 in cash, and CMV and will give the Company an option, upon makingadditionally either pay UMMS another $800,000 in cash or issue to UMMS $800,000 of RXi common stock that is to be valued on a specified payment, to negotiate an exclusive worldwide license to the disclosed technologies on commercially reasonable terms. Approximately one year remainsper share basis for this purpose based on the technologyvaluation of RXi in the initial funding. RXi also will be obligated to pay UMMS $100,000 on each of the first and second anniversaries of the effective date of the invention disclosure option. As of December 31, 2005, we have made cash payments to UMMS totaling

33


$1.1 million pursuant to the collaboration agreement with UMMS, but have not yet acquired or made any payments to acquire any options under that agreement.
     In May 2004, we licensed from the technology transfer company of the Imperial College of Science, Technology & Medicine, or Imperial College, the exclusive rights to intellectual property covering a drug screening method using RIP 140, which is a nuclear hormone co-repressor that is believed to regulate fat accumulation. In consideration of the license, we made cash payments to Imperial College totaling $87,000 and issued it a total of 75,000 shares of our common stock which were valued, for financial statement purposes, at $108,000.
     Because the then-aggregate fair market value of $108,000. As the drug screening technologytechnologies licensed from UMMS and Imperial College and the RNAi technology from UMMS had not achieved technological feasibility at the time of their license by us,that we licensed them, had no alternative future uses and, therefore, had no separate economic value, the total valuecost of all cash payments and stock issued for acquisition of the technology was expensed as research and development in our financial statements.development.

42


     Net Operating Loss Carryforward
     At December 31, 2005,2006, we had consolidatedUnited States federal and state net operating loss carryforwards forof $87.2 million and $28.0 million, respectively, available to offset against future taxable income, tax purposes of $35.6 million, which will expire in 20062007 through 2025 if not utilized. We also have2026. As a result of a change in-control that occurred in our shareholder base in July 2002, approximately $51.8 million in federal net operating loss carryforwards became limited in their availability to $747,000 annually. The remaining $35.4 million in federal net operating loss carryforwards, and the $27.4 million in state net operating loss carryforwards, are unrestricted. Additionally, due to the change-in-control, approximately $6.3 million of research and development tax credits will not be available for utilization and were written off. As of December 31, 2006, we also had research and development and orphan drug tax credits for federal and state purposes of approximately $2.1 million and $200,000, respectively, available to reducefor offset against future income taxes, if any, of $6.4 million, which will expire in 20062007 through 2025 if not utilized. The amount of net operating loss carryforwards and research tax credits available to reduce income taxes in any particular year may be limited in certain circumstances.2026. Based on an assessment of all available evidence including, but not limited to, our limited operating history in our core business and lack of profitability, uncertainties of the commercial viability of our technology, the impact of government regulation and healthcare reform initiatives, and other risks normally associated with biotechnology companies, we have concluded that it is more likely than not that these net operating loss carryforwards and credits will not be realized and, as a result, a 100% deferred tax valuation allowance has been recorded against these assets.
Results of Operations
     CytRx Corporation recorded net losses of $16.8 million, $15.1 million $16.4 million and $17.8$16.4 million during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, and 2003.respectively.
     We recognized $1.9 million in service revenues, of which $1.8 million resulted from our $24.3 million sale to the ALS Charitable Remainder Trust of a one-percent royalty interest in the worldwide sales of arimoclomol in the year ended December 31, 2006. Additionally, during 2006 we earned an immaterial amount in licensingof license fees duringand grant revenue. In the yearsyear ended December 31, 2005, 2004we earned an immaterial amount of service and 2003.license fee revenue. All future licensing fees under outour current licensing agreements are dependent upon successful development milestones being achieved by the licensor. During fiscal 2006,2007, we are not anticipating receivingthe receipt of any significant service or licensing fees.fees, although we estimate that we will recognize an additional $6.5 million in service revenues from that arimoclomol royalty transaction. We will continue to recognize the balance of the deferred revenue recorded from the royalty transaction with the ALS Charitable Remainder Trust based on actual research and development costs incurred over the development period of our arimoclomol research.
Research and Development
                        
 Year Ended December 31,  Years Ended December 31, 
 2005 2004 2003  2006 2005 2004 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Research and development expense $8,867 $4,626 $1,485  $8,858 $8,867 $4,624 
Non-cash research and development expense 220 1,387 2,903  674 220 1,388 
Employee stock option expense 249   
Acquired in-process research and development expense  3,022     3,022 
              
 $9,087 $9,035 $4,388  $9,781 $9,087 $9,034 
              
     Research expenses are expenses incurred by us in the discovery of new information that will assist us in the creation and the development of new drugs or treatments. Development expenses are expenses incurred by us in our efforts to commercialize the findings generated through our research efforts. Our research and development expenses were $9.1 million in 2005, $9.0 million in 2004 and $4.4 million in 2003.
     Research and development expenses incurred during 2006 and 2005 relate primarily to (i) the initiation of our Phase II clinical program for arimoclomol in ALS, (ii) our ongoing research and development related to other drug candidates purchased from Biorex, (iii) our research and development activities conducted at UMMS related to the technologies covered by the UMMS license agreements, (iv) our collaboration and invention disclosure agreement pursuant to which UMMS has agreed to disclose certain inventions to us and provide us with the right to acquire an

3443


right to acquire an option to negotiate exclusive licenses for those disclosed technologies, and (v) the on-going small molecule drug discovery operations at our Massachusetts laboratory. Although our future research and development activities could vary substantially, our research and development activities will remain substantial in the future as a result of commitments related to the foregoing activities. Research and development expenses presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements during 2004 were primarily the result of efforts to develop RNAi through new and existing licensing agreements, sponsored research agreements, as well as research and development efforts performed at our Massachusetts laboratory. Research and development expenses incurred in 2003 were primarily for the acquisition and licensing of intellectual property and the commencement of operations of our Massachusetts laboratory. All research and development costs related to the activities of RXi and our laboratory arewere expensed. No in-process research and development costs were eligible for capitalization at the time we purchased the minority interest in our prior subsidiary, CytRx Laboratories.
     In October 2004, we acquired all of the clinical and pharmaceutical and related intellectual property assets of Biorex, a Hungry-based company focused on the development of novel small molecules with broad therapeutic applications in neurology, diabetes and cardiology for approximately $3.5 million in cash. Included in the assets acquired from Biorex are a 500-compound molecular library, as well as the molecules arimoclomol, iroxanadine and bimoclomol, each of which had, at the time of acquisition, successfully completed the European equivalent of a Phase I clinical trial. After management’s evaluation of the acquired technology, approximately $3.0 million of the acquisition price was expensed in 2004 as in-process research and development.
     As compensation to members of our scientific advisory board and consultants, and in connection with the acquisition of technology, we sometimes issue shares of our common stock, stock options and warrants to purchase shares of our common stock. For financial statement purposes, we value these shares of common stock, stock options, and warrants at the fair value of the common stock, stock options or warrants granted, or the services received, whichever is more reliably measurable. We recorded non-cash charges of $0.2 million,$700,000, $200,000, and $1.4 million in this regard during 2006, 2005, and $2.9 million2004, respectively. With our adoption of SFAS 123(R) during 2006, we recorded $249,000 of employee stock option expense. No corresponding expense existed in 2005 2004, and 2003, respectively.or 2004.
     In 2006,2007, we expect our research and development expenses to increase primarily as a result of our ongoing Phase II clinical program with arimoclomol and related studies for the treatment of ALS.ALS and our continued development of our RNAi assets by our majority-owned subsidiary RXi. We currently estimate that the Phase IIIIb trial for arimoclomol for ALS and related studies will cost approximately $17.8$26.8 million of which approximately $3.8 million had been spent as of December 31, 2005, and will last betweenover the 24 to 30 months.months beginning December 2006. Additionally, we estimate that our costs related to theRXi will expend approximately $6.2 million on development activities of our Massachusetts laboratory will be consistent with expenses incurred in 2005.for 2007.
General and administrative expenseexpenses
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2005  2004  2003 
  (In thousands) 
General and administrative expense $6,057  $5,924  $3,841 
Common stock, stock options and warrants issued for general and administrative expense  367   1,977   3,148 
          
  $6,424  $7,901  $6,989 
          
             
  Years Ended December 31, 
  2006  2005  2004 
  (In thousands) 
General and administrative expenses $8,622  $6,057  $5,924 
Stock, stock option and warrant expenses to non-employees and consultants  60   367   1,977 
Employee stock option expense  975       
          
  $9,657  $6,424  $7,901 
          
     General and administrative expenses include all administrative salaries and general corporation expenses.corporate expenses, including legal expenses associated with the prosecution of our intellectual property. Our total general and administrative expenses, includingexcluding common stock, stock options and warrants issued, and excluding depreciation expenses, were $6.4$8.6 million in 2006, $6.1 million in 2005 $7.9and $5.9 million in 20042004. General and $7.0administrative expenses increased by $2.6 million in 2003.2006 as compared to 2005 as a result of our ongoing Sarbanes-Oxley Act compliance efforts, an increase in administrative salaries and legal expenses. The legal expenses increase of $600,000 was associated with maintenance of our patent portfolio and the formation of

44


RXi. During 2007, we expect legal expenses to remain consistent with 2006 levels, as we expect patent expenses to increase, while being off-set by a decline in legal expenses associated with the formation of RXi. In our efforts to comply with Sarbanes-Oxley for the year-ended December 31, 2006 we incurred approximately $800,000 in consulting, audit and accounting system conversion expense. CytRx was required to comply with the attestation requirements under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for the first time for the year ended December 31, 2006; therefore there are no corresponding expenses in 2005. We expect to incur in 2007 a similar level of expense associated with our Sarbanes-Oxley compliance. Our general and administrative expenses, netsalaries increased by $600,000 over the 2005 expense level as a result of common stock, stock optionsa higher bonuses, additional regulatory and warrants issued, were $6.1 million in 2005, $5.9 million in 2004accounting personnel and $3.8 million in 2003. General and administrative expenses during 2005 as compared to 2004 were relatively constant.annual salary increases. During 2005, the Companywe incurred approximately $0.9 million in higher salary expense than 2004, although the difference in total general and administrative expense was substantially smaller between 2005 and 2004 due to one-time expenses associated with our change in auditors in 2004, severance paid to certain members of management in the first half of 2004, and the settlement of certain legal proceedings, for which there was no comparable expensesexpense in 2005. For the same reasons, general and administrative expensesWith our adoption of SFAS 123(R) during 2004 were higher as compared to 2003. We expect our general and administrative expenses in 2006, to be slightly higher than those incurredwe recorded $975,000 of employee stock option expense. No corresponding expense existed in 2005 as a result of our ongoing Sarbanes-Oxley compliance efforts.or 2004.

35


     From time to time, we issue shares of our common stock or warrants or options to purchase shares of our common stock to consultants and other service providers in exchange for services. For financial statement purposes, we value these shares of common stock, stock options, and warrants at the fair value of the common stock, stock options or warrants granted, or the services received, whichever iswe can measure more reliably measurable.reliably. We recorded non-cash charges of $0.4$0.1 million $2.0 million, and $3.1during 2006, $0.4 million during 2005 2004, and 2003, respectively.$2.0 million during 2004. These charges relate primarily to common stock, stock options and warrants issued for licensing fees and in connection with the engagement and retention of financial, business development and scientific advisors. During 2004, as our business strategy matured, less use of financial business advisors was required, which resulted in substantially fewer options and common stock being issued as compared to 2003.
     Depreciation and amortization expense
     Depreciation and amortization expenses were $228,000, $217,000 and $104,000 in 2006, 2005 and $2,000 in 2005, 2004, and 2003 respectively. Depreciation and amortization expenses recorded in 2005 reflectThe depreciation expense reflects the depreciation of our fixed assets located at our obesity and diabetes laboratory, as well as $75,000 ofthe amortization expenses related to theour molecular screening library, acquired from Biorex in October 2004 andwhich was placed in service in March 2005. Depreciation incurred in 2004 consists almost entirely of depreciation on assets acquired for our obesity and diabetes laboratory. During the fourth quarter of 2003 and the first two quarters of 2004, we increased our capital spending as part of our overall strategy to establish our obesity and diabetes laboratory. As our need for additional equipment was nominal during 2005, our net capital assets declined to $726,000, net of depreciation, from $895,000 at December 31, 2004. During 2004, capital assets increased by $668,000 to $895,000, net of depreciation. As a result of these additions to assets, depreciation related to capital equipment increased from $2,000 in 2003 to $104,000 in 2004.
     Severance and other contractual payments to officers
     In accordance with a Mutual General Release and Severance AgreementAgreements entered into in May 2004, we paid our former General Counsel and our former Chief Financial Officer, approximately $52,000 and 12 months of related benefits and vested options to purchase 87,500 shares of our common stock that were granted upon the commencement of his employment. In accordance with a Mutual General Release and Severance Agreement in May 2004, we paid our former Chief Financial Officer, approximately $150,000 and 18 months of related benefits, respectively. In addition, as part of the same agreements, the General Counsel and Chief Financial Officer were vested in options to purchase 87,500 and 105,000 shares, respectively, of our common stock that were granted upon the commencement of his employment.
Loss on facility abandonment
          Subsequent to our merger with Global Genomics in 2002, we recorded a loss of $478,000 associated with the closure of our Atlanta headquarters and our relocation to Los Angeles. This loss represented the total remaining lease obligations and estimated operating costs through the remainder of the lease term, less estimated sublease rental income and deferred rent at the time. In August 2005, we entered into a lease termination agreement pursuant to which we were released from all future obligations on the lease in exchange for a one-time $110,000 payment and the forfeiture of a $49,000 security deposit. As a result of this agreement, we realized a $163,000 offset against third quarter general and administrative expenses.stock.
     Interest income
     Interest income was $997,000 in 2006, as compared to $206,000 in 2005 as compared toand $60,000 in 2004 and $82,000 in 2003.2004. The variances between years are attributable primarily attributable to the amount of cash available for investment each year and, higher interest yields.
Equity Losses from Minority-Owned Entity
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2005  2004  2003 
  (In thousands) 
Equity losses from minority-owned entity $  $  $245 
Asset impairment charge        5,869 
Amortization of acquired developed technology        548 
          
  $  $  $6,662 
          

36


          Blizzard ceased operations at the end of 2003. Prior to that time, we recorded our portion of the net loss of Blizzarda lesser extent, changes in accordance with the equity method of accounting. In 2003, we recorded $6.7 million in equity losses, of which $5.9 million was an asset impairment charge, $245,000 was our 40% share of the net loss in Blizzard and $548,000 was amortization of acquired developed technology. For the period July 19, 2002 (date of acquisition of Global) to December 31, 2002, we recorded $665,000 in equity losses, of which $330,000 was our share in the net losses of Blizzard Genomics and $335,000 was amortization of acquired developed technology.prevailing market rates.
     Minority interest in losses of subsidiary
     We recorded $81,000 in 2005 and $160,000 in 2004 and $20,000 in 2003 related to the 5% minority interest in losses of our former CytRx Laboratories which we acquired in September 2003.subsidiary. On June 30, 2005, we repurchased the outstanding 5% minority interest in CytRx Laboratories from Dr. Michael Czech, and on September 30, 2005, we completedmerged CytRx Laboratories into CytRx.
     RXi is approximately 85%-owned by CytRx, and began operating as a stand-alone company with its own management, business, and operations in January 2007. Following RXi’s initial funding, we have agreed under our letter agreement with UMMS and our separate stockholders agreement with RXi and its other current stockholders to reduce our share of ownership of RXi to less than a majority of the mergeroutstanding voting power as soon as reasonably practicable. During the time that RXi is majority-owned, the consolidated financial statements of CytRx Laboratories withwill include 100% of the assets and intoliabilities of RXi and the Company.ownership interests of the minority shareholders will be recorded as “minority interests.” In the future, if CytRx owns more than 20% but less than 50% of the outstanding shares of RXi, CytRx would account for its investment in RXi using the equity method. Under the equity method, CytRx would record its pro-rata share of the gains or losses of RXi against its historical cost basis investment in RXi. For 2007, we expect RXi’s research and development expenses will be approximately $5.1 million, which, if RXi were to remain a consolidated subsidiary of CytRx,

45


would result in an increase in our consolidated research and development expenses and a corresponding decrease in our consolidated working capital.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
     In December 2004,On July 13, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) revised and issued SFAS 123, Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123(R)). SFAS 123(R) eliminates the alternativeInterpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of using the APB 25 intrinsic value method ofFASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN No. 48”), to create a single model to address accounting for stock options. This reviseduncertainty in tax positions. FIN No. 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold in which a tax position be reached before financial statement will require recognition of the cost of employee services receivedrecognition. FIN No. 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in exchangeinterim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN No. 48 is effective for awards of equity instruments based on the fair value of the award at the grant date. This cost is required to be recognized over the vesting period of the award. The stock-based compensation table in Note 2 to our audited financial statements illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share for 2005, 2004 and 2003 if we had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 to stock-based employee compensation. SFAS 123(R) applies to all awards granted, modified, repurchased, or cancelledfiscal years beginning after June 30, 2005.December 15, 2006. We will adopt SFAS 123(R) effectiveFIN No. 48 as of January 1, 2006, using the modified prospective method. As a result of2007, as required. While we have not yet completed our analysis, we do not expect that the adoption of this statement,FIN No. 48 will have a significant impact on our compensation expensefinancial position and results of operations.
     On September 15, 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157,Fair Value Measurements(“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for share-based paymentsmeasuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. SFAS No. 157 is expected to be approximately $0.6 millioneffective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We does not expect SFAS No. 157 will have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
     In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in 2006, but may be significantly greater dependant upon levels of share-based payments granted inCurrent Year Financial Statements” (“SAB 108”). SAB 108 provides interpretive guidance on how the future, option valuation models utilized and assumptions selected at the timeeffects of the future grants.carryover or reversal of prior year misstatements should be considered in quantifying a current year misstatement. The SEC staff believes that registrants should quantify errors using both the balance sheet and income statement approach when quantifying a misstatement. SAB 108 is effective for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2006. We have adopted SAB 108 with no effect on our consolidated financial statements.
     In December 2004,2006, the FASB issued SFAS 153 (“SFAS 153”), “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB No. 29, FASB Staff Position EITF 00-19-2,Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions.” SFAS 153 requires exchangesRegistration Payment Arrangements(“FSP 00-19-2”). FSP 00-19-2 specifies that the contingent obligation to make future payments or otherwise transfer consideration under a registration payment arrangement, whether issued as a separate agreement or included as a provision of productive assetsa financial instrument or other agreement, should be separately recognized and measured in accordance with FASB Statement No. 5,Accounting for Contingencies. For registration payment arrangements and financial instruments subject to be accounted for at fair value, rather than at carryover basis, unless (1) neitherthose arrangements that were entered into prior to the asset received nor the asset surrendered has a fair value that is determinable within reasonable limits or (2) the transactions lack commercial substance. SFAS 153issuance of EITF 00-19-2, this guidance is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring infinancial statements issued for fiscal periodsyears beginning after JuneDecember 15, 2005. Adoption2006. We have elected to reflect early adoption of this standardFSP 00-19-2 in our 2006 financial statements, and the adoption did not have an effect on our financial statements.
     We do not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards would have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
          In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections”, (“SFAS 154”). SFAS 154 replaces APB Opinion No. 20, “Accounting Changes,” and SFAS No. 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements,” and changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. We are required to adopt SFAS 154 in 2006. Ourposition, results of operations and financial condition will only be impacted by SFAS 154 if we implement changes in accounting principles that are addressed by the standard or correct accounting errors in future periods.
Related Party Transactions
          Dr. Michael Czech, who was until June 30, 2005 a 5% minority shareholder of our prior subsidiary, CytRx Laboratories, and who is a member of our Scientific Advisory Board, is an employee of UMMS and is the principal investigator for a sponsored research agreement between CytRx and UMMS. During each of 2005 and 2004, Dr. Czech was paid $80,000 for his Scientific Advisory Board services. In addition, during 2005 and

37


2004, we paid UMMS $1,410,000 and $403,000, respectively, under a sponsored research agreement to fund a portion of Dr. Czech’s research.cash flows
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
     We have not entered into off-balance sheet financing arrangements, other than operating leases.
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskQUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
     Our exposure to market risk is limited primarily to interest income sensitivity, which is affected by changes in the general level of United States interest rates, particularly because a significant portion of our investments are in short-term debt securities issued by the U.S. government and institutional money market funds. The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while at the same time maximizing theoptimize our interest income received without significantly increasing risk. Due to the nature of our short-term investments, we believe that we are not subject to any material market risk exposure.consistent with preserving principal. We do not have any derivative financial instruments or foreign currency instruments. If interest rates had varied by 10% in 2005,2006, it would not have had a material effectan impact of

46


approximately $100,000 on our statement of operations orand cash flows for 20052006 based upon our December 31, 2005 balances.2006 cash and cash equivalents balance.
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary DataFINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
     Our consolidated financial statements and supplemental schedule and notes thereto as of December 31, 20052006 and 2004,2005, and for each of the three years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 2004 and 2003,2004, together with the independent registered public accounting firms’ reports thereon, are set forth on pages F-1 to F-21F-25 of this Annual Report.
Item 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
     An evaluation was performed by our management team, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of ourWe maintain disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2005,that are designed to ensure that the end ofinformation disclosed in the period covered by this Annual Report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2005 to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submitwith the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
     Management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as of December 31, 2006, in accordance with Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation and the existence of certain material weaknesses discussed below under “Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting,” our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2006.
     There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2005,2006 that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
     Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions of our company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; (3) provide reasonable assurance that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (4) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
     Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with policies and procedures may deteriorate.
     We assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) inInternal Control-Integrated Framework.

3847


     Based upon management’s assessment using the criteria contained in COSO, and for the reasons discussed below, our management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2006, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective.
     Pursuant to standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, a “material weakness” is a “significant deficiency or combination of significant deficiencies that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be presented or detected.” Management identified the following material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006:
     A. Until the third quarter of 2005, our laboratory in Worcester, Massachusetts was operated by our subsidiary, CytRx Laboratories, Inc. (“CytRx Labs”). CytRx Labs maintained a separate accounting system, although the general ledger accounts in its system and our accounting system were identically numbered. On September 30, 2005, CytRx Labs was merged into CytRx, and we continued to operate the laboratory as an integrated part of CytRx.
     In the first quarter of 2006, for the sake of administrative efficiency, CytRx Labs’ general ledger system was integrated into our general ledger system by combining the laboratory’s general ledger accounts with our identically numbered accounts. In the process, expenses of the laboratory relating to rent, payroll and related employee benefits, which should properly have been classified as research and development expenses due to the nature of our activities carried on at the laboratory, were improperly classified as general and administrative expenses and reported as such in our consolidated financial statements for the first three quarters of 2006, because they were combined with corresponding accounts of CytRx, whose corporate offices and personnel are devoted primarily to administrative activities. Our management concluded that the foregoing constituted a material weakness in the effectiveness of our internal controls over quarterly and annual financial statement reporting.
     B. In May and September of 2003, we completed private placements of securities that included warrants to purchase approximately 2.8 million shares of our common stock. These warrants contain provisions for anti-dilution adjustments based upon future sales of our common stock or common stock equivalents at an effective price per share below the prevailing market price of our common stock at the time of the sale. We subsequently completed private placement transactions in January 2005 and in March 2006 involving our sale of securities at prices which triggered the foregoing anti-dilution adjustments to the warrants in question, and we recorded those adjustments as deemed dividends. Based upon a reevaluation of our historical accounting for those anti-dilution adjustments, management determined that, by analogy to the guidance provided by SFAS No. 128,Earnings Per Share, the deemed dividends should be subtracted from our net earnings (loss) (i.e., added to our net loss) to arrive at net loss allocable to common stockholders and for the purpose of calculating our net earnings (loss) per share. Our management concluded that the foregoing constituted a material weakness in the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting related to the application of generally accepted accounting principles.
     Having completed our review and evaluation of the integration of the former separate accounting system of our laboratory facility in connection with the preparation of our annual financial statements for 2006, we believe that the remediation of this weakness has been completed. In addition, we intend to pursue actions to enhance internal review of all equity transactions to ensure the effectiveness of all aspects of our controls related to the accounting for anti-dilution adjustments to our outstanding warrants and other securities.
     We continuously seek to improve and strengthen our control processes to ensure that all of our controls and procedures are adequate and effective. Any failure to implement and maintain improvements in the controls over our financial reporting could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations under the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and regulations. Any failure to improve our internal controls to address the weakness we have identified could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative impact on the trading price of our common stock.

48


     Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 has been audited by BDO Seidman, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.

49


PART III
Item 10.Directors and Executive Officers of the RegistrantDIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
     The following table providessets forth information concerning our directors and executive officers:
         
      Class of  
Name Age Director(1) Position
Max Link, Ph.D.  6566  III Director, Chairman of the Board(2)(3)
Steven A. Kriegsman  6465  II Director, Chief Executive Officer, President
Marvin R. Selter  7879  II Director, Vice Chairman of the Board(2)(3)(4)
Louis Ignarro, Ph.D.  6465  I Director
Joseph Rubinfeld, Ph.D.  7374  I Director(2)(4)
Richard L. Wennekamp  6364  II Director(2)(3)(4)
Mark A. Tepper, Ph.D.  4849   Senior Vice President;President — Drug Discovery
Matthew Natalizio  5152   Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
Jack R. Barber, Ph.D.  5051   Senior Vice President — Drug DevelopmentChief Scientific Officer
Benjamin S. Levin  3031   General Counsel, Vice President — Legal Affairs and Corporate Secretary
Tod Woolf, Ph.D.42President and Chief Executive Officer of RXi Pharmaceuticals Corporation
 
(1) Our Class I directors serve until the 2007 annual meeting of stockholders, our Class II directors serve until the 2008 annual meeting of stockholders and our Class III director serves until the 20062009 annual meeting of stockholders.
 
(2) These directors constitute the members of our Audit Committee. Mr. Selter is the Chairman of the Committee.
 
(3) These directors constitute the members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Wennekamp is Chairman of the Committee.
 
(4) These directors constitute the members of our Compensation Committee. Dr. Rubinfeld is Chairman of the committee.
     Max Link, Ph.Dhas been a director since 1996. Dr. Link has been retired from business since 2003. From March 2002 until its acquisition by Zimmer Holdings, Dr. Link served as Chairman and CEO of Centerpulse, Ltd. From May 1993 to June 1994, Dr. Link served as the Chief Executive Officer of Corange Ltd. (the holding company for Boehringer Mannheim Therapeutics, Boehringer Mannheim Diagnostics and DePuy International). From 1992 to 1993, Dr. Link was Chairman of Sandoz Pharma, Ltd. From 1987 to 1992, Dr. Link was the Chief Executive Officer of Sandoz Pharma and a member of the Executive Board of Sandoz, Ltd., Basel. Prior to 1987, Dr. Link served in various capacities with the United States operations of Sandoz, including President and Chief Executive Officer. Dr. Link also serves as a director of Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Celsion Corporation, Discovery Laboratories, Inc., Human Genome Sciences, Inc. and PDL BioPharma, Inc.
     Steven A. Kriegsmanhas been a director and our President and Chief Executive Officer since July 2002. He also serves as a director of our majority-owned subsidiary, RXi Pharmaceuticals Corporation. He previously served as a directorDirector and the Chairman of Global Genomics sincefrom June 2000. Mr. Kriegsman is an inactive Chairman and founderFounder of Kriegsman Capital Group LLC, a financial advisory firm specializing in the development of alternative sources of equity capital for emerging growth companies. Mr. Kriegsmancompanies in the healthcare industry. He has advised such companies as SuperGen Inc., Closure Medical Corporation, Novoste Corporation, Miravant Medical Technologies, and Maxim Pharmaceuticals and Supergen Inc.Pharmaceuticals. Mr. Kriegsman has a B.S.BS degree with honors from New York University in accountingAccounting and completed the Executive Program in Mergers and Acquisitions at New York University, The Management Institute. Mr. Kriegsman was formerly a Certified Public Accountant with KPMG in New York City. He serves as a directorDirector and is the former Chairman of Bradley Pharmaceuticals, Inc.the Audit

3950


Committee of Bradley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. In February 2006, Mr. Kriegsman received the Corporate Philanthropist of the Year Award from the Greater Los Angeles Chapter of the ALS Association and in October 2006, he received the Lou Gehrig Memorial Corporate Award from the Muscular Dystrophy Association. Mr. Kriegsman has been active in various charitable organizations including the Biotechnology Industry Organization, the ALS Association, the Los Angeles Venture Association, the Southern California Biomedical Council, and the Palisades-Malibu YMCA.
     Marvin R. Selterhas been a director since October 2003. He has been President and Chief Executive Officer of CMS, Inc. since he founded that firm in 1968. CMS, Inc. is a national management consulting firm. In 1972, Mr. Selter originated the concept of employee leasing. He serves as a member of the Business Tax Advisory Committee—City of Los Angeles, Small Business Board—State of California and the Small Business Advisory Commission—State of California. Mr. Selter also serves on the Valley Economic Development Center as past Chairman and Audit Committee Chairman, the Board of Valley Industry and Commerce Association as past Chairman, the Advisory Board of the San Fernando Economic Alliance and the California State University—Northridge as Chairman of the Economic Research Center. He has served, and continues to serve, as a member of boards of directors of various hospitals, universities, private medical companies and other organizations. Mr. Selter attended Rutgers—The State University, majoring in Accounting and Business Administration. He was an LPA having served as Controller, Financial Vice President and Treasurer at distribution, manufacturing and service firms. He has lectured extensively on finance, corporate structure and budgeting for the American Management Association and other professional teaching associations.
     Louis Ignarro, Ph.D.has been a director since July 2002. He previously served as a director of Global Genomics since November 20, 2000. Dr. Ignarro serves as the Jerome J. Belzer, M.D. Distinguished Professor of Pharmacology in the Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology at the UCLA School of Medicine. Dr. Ignarro has been at the UCLA School of Medicine since 1985 as a professor, acting chairman and assistant dean. Dr. Ignarro received the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 1998. Dr. Ignarro received a B.S. in pharmacy from Columbia University and his Ph.D. in Pharmacology from the University of Minnesota.
     Joseph Rubinfeld, Ph.D.has been a director since July 2002. He co-founded SuperGen, Inc. in 1991 and has served as its Chief Executive Officer and President and as a director since its inception until December 31, 2003. He resigned as Chairman Emeritus of SuperGen, Inc. on FebruraryFebruary 8, 2005. Dr. Rubinfeld was also Chief Scientific Officer of SuperGen from 1991 until September 1997. Dr. Rubinfeld is also a founder of, and currently serves as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of, JJ Pharma. Dr. Rubinfeld was one of the four initial founders of Amgen, Inc. in 1980 and served as a Vice President and its Chief of Operations until 1983. From 1987 until 1990, Dr. Rubinfeld was a Senior Director at Cetus Corporation and from 1968 to 1980, Dr. Rubinfeld was employed at Bristol-Myers Company, International Division in a variety of positions. Dr. Rubinfeld received a B.S. degree in chemistry from C.C.N.Y. and an M.A. and Ph.D. in chemistry from Columbia University.
     Richard L. Wennekamphas been a director since October 2003. He has been the Senior Vice President-Credit Administration of Community Bank since October 2002. From September 1998 to July 2002, Mr. Wennekamp was an executive officer of Bank of America Corporation, holding various positions, including Managing Director-Credit Product Executive for the last four years of his 22-year term with the bank. From 1977 through 1980, Mr. Wennekamp was a Special Assistant to former President of the United States, Gerald R. Ford, and the Executive Director of the Ford Transition Office. Prior thereto, he served as Staff Assistant to the President of the United States for one year, and as the Special Assistant to the Assistant Secretary of Commerce of the U.S.
     Mark A. Tepper, Ph.D.was the President and co-founder of our prior subsidiary CytRx Laboratories (formerly Araios, Inc.) since September 2004, and is now our Senior Vice President, Drug Discovery. From November 2002 to August 2003, he served as an independent pharmaceutical consultant. Prior to that, from April 2002 to October 2002, he served as President and CEO of Arradial, Inc., an Oxford Biosciences Venture-backed company developing a novel microfluidics based drug discovery platform. From April 1995 to March 2002, Dr. Tepper served in a number of senior management roles at Serono, US, including Vice President,

51


Research and Operations for the US Pharmaceutical Research Institute and Executive Director of Lead Discovery. From 1988 to 1995, Dr. Tepper was Sr. Research Investigator at the Bristol Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute where he worked on the discovery and development of novel drugs in the area of Oncology and Immunology. Prior to that, Dr. Tepper was a post-doctoral fellow at the University of Massachusetts Medical School in the laboratory of Dr. Michael Czech. Dr. Tepper received a B.A. in Chemistry from Clark University with highest honors, and a Ph.D. in Biochemistry and Biophysics from Columbia University.
     Matthew Nataliziohas been our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since July 2004. From November 2002 to December 2003, he was President and General Manager of a privately held furniture manufacturing company. Prior

40


to that, from January 2000 to October 2002, he was Chief Financial Officer at Qualstar Corporation, a publicly traded designer and manufacturer of data storage devices. He was also the Vice President of Operations Support, the Vice President — Finance and Treasurer of Superior National Insurance Group, a publicly traded workers’ compensation insurance company. Mr. Natalizio is a CPA who worked at Ernst and Young as an Audit Manager and Computer Audit Executive and was a Senior Manager at KPMG. He earned his Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics from the University of California, Los Angeles.
     Jack Barber, Ph.D.has been our Senior Vice President — Drug Development since July 2004.2004, and was recently named Chief Scientific Officer. He previously served as Chief Technical Officer and Vice President of Research and Development at Immusol, a biopharmaceutical company based in San Diego, California, since 1994. Prior to that, Dr. Barber spent seven years in various management positions at Viagene, most recently serving as Associate Director of Oncology. Dr. Barber received both his B.S. and Ph.D. in Biochemistry from the University of California, Los Angeles. He also carried out his post-doctoral fellowship at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in La Jolla, California.
     Benjamin S. Levinhas been our General Counsel, Vice President — Legal Affairs and Corporate Secretary since July 2004. From November 1999 to June 2004, Mr. Levin was an associate in the transactions department of the Los Angeles office of O’Melveny & Myers LLP. Mr. Levin received his S.B. in Economics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and a J.D. from Stanford Law School.
     Tod Woolf, Ph.D.,has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of our majority-owned subsidiary, RXi Pharmaceuticals Corporation, since January 2007. Dr. Woolf has twenty years’ experience developing and commercializing innovative biomedical technologies, including twelve years of biotechnology management experience. He founded Sequitur, an RNAi company acquired by Invitrogen (Nasdaq: IVGN) in 1996 and served from 1996 until 2003 as Chief Executive. From November 2003 until November 2006 he served as an advisor to Invitrogen and he has served as an advisor to other biotechnology companies including Praecis (acquired by GlaxoSmithkine) and Signet Laboratories (acquired by Covance). While at Sequitur, Dr. Woolf co-invented and commercialized STEALTH RNAi, one of the most widely used second generation RNAi products. Previously, he helped to develop and partner the core therapeutic technology at now public companies Genta, RPI (now SIRNA) and Ontogeny (now Curis). Dr. Woolf holds a Masters Degree and Doctorate in Biology from Harvard University. He has authored 40 patent applications and scientific publications and has given drug development lectures throughout the world.
Director Independence
Our board of directors has determined that Messrs. Link, Rubinfeld, Selter and Wennekamp are “independent” under the current independence standards of both the Nasdaq Capital Market and the SEC, and have no material relationships with us (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of any entity) which could be inconsistent with a finding of their independence as members of our board of directors or as the members of our Audit Committee. In making these determinations, our board of directors has broadly considered all relevant facts and circumstances, recognizing that material relationships can include commercial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, and familial relationships, among others.
     Our board of directors has a standing Audit Committee currently composed of Messrs. Selter, Link, Rubinfeld and Wennekamp. Our board of directors has determined that Mr. Selter, one of the independent

52


directors serving on our Audit Committee, also is an audit committee financial expert as defined by the SEC’s rules.
     The Audit Committee must pre-approve all auditing services and all permitted non-auditing services to be provided by our outside auditors. In general, the Audit Committee’s policy is to grant such approval where it determines that the non-audit services are not incompatible with maintaining the auditors’ independence and there are cost or other efficiencies in obtaining such services from the auditors as compared to other possible providers. During the year ended 2006, the Audit Committee approved all of the non-audit services proposals submitted to it.
Transactions with Related Persons
General
     Our Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving, as appropriate, all transactions with related persons, in accordance with its Charter and Nasdaq Marketplace Rules. We had no transactions with related persons in 2006, and there are no transactions currently proposed for 2007.
     Transactions between us, or our RXi subsidiary, and one or more related persons may present risks or conflicts of interest or the appearance of conflicts of interest. Our Code of Ethics requires all employees, officers and directors to avoid activities or relationships that conflict, or may be perceived to conflict, with our interests or adversely affect our reputation. It is understood, however, that certain relationships or transactions may arise that would be deemed acceptable and appropriate so long as there is full disclosure of the interest of the related parties in the transaction and review and approval by disinterested directors to ensure there is a legitimate business reason for the transaction and that the transaction is fair to us and our stockholders.
     As a result, the procedures followed by the Audit Committee to evaluate transactions with related persons require:
that all related person transactions, all material terms of the transactions, and all the material facts as to the related person’s direct or indirect interest in, or relationship to, the related person transaction must be communicated to the Audit Committee; and
that all related person transactions, and any material amendment or modification to any related person transaction, be reviewed and approved or ratified by the Audit Committee, as required by Nasdaq Marketplace Rules.
     Our Audit Committee will evaluate related person transactions based on:
information provided by members of our board of directors in connection with the required annual evaluation of director independence;
pertinent responses to the Directors’ and Officers’ Questionnaires submitted periodically by our officers and directors and provided to the Audit Committee by our management;
background information on nominees for director provided by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of our board of directors; and
any other relevant information provided by any of our directors or officers.
     In connection with its review and approval or ratification, if appropriate, of any related person transaction, our Audit Committee is to consider whether the transaction will compromise standards included in our Code of Ethics. In the case of any related person transaction involving an outside director or nominee for

53


director, the Audit Committee also is to consider whether the transaction will compromise the director’s status as an independent director as prescribed in the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules.
     From time to time, there were receivables in immaterial amounts owed between us and our Chief Executive Officer related to travel and entertainment expense reimbursement, including personal charges to be reimbursed to us by our Chief Executive Officer. During 2005 and 2006, the largest amount owing to us was approximately $27,000, and the largest amount that we owed him was approximately $21,000. All amounts were subsequently repaid, and we did not deem the foregoing to constitute a related person transaction.
     All of our related person transactions will be disclosed in our filings with the SEC in accordance with SEC rules.
Exemption Clause
     Item 404(a)(7)(a) of Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K states that: Disclosure need not be provided if the transaction is one where the rates or charges involved in the transaction are determined by competitive bid, or the transaction involves rendering of services as a common or contract carrier, or public utility, at rates or charges fixed in conformity with law or governmental authority.
Applicable Definitions
     For purposes of our Audit Committee’s revew:
“related person” has the meaning given to such term in Item 404(a) of Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K (“Item 404(a)”); and
“related person transaction” means any transaction for which disclosure is required under the terms of Item 404(a) involving the Company and any related persons.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
     Our executive officers and directors and any person who owns more than 10% of our outstanding shares of common stock are required byunder Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock and to furnish us with copies of those reports. Based solely on our review of copies of reports we have received and written representations from certain reporting persons, we believe that all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our directors and executive officers and greater than 10% shareholders for 2005 were2006 complied with.with all applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements.
Code of Ethics
     We have adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer or controller, a copy of which is filed as an exhibitavailable on our website at www.cytrx.com. We will furnish, without charge, a copy of our Code of Ethics upon request. Such requests should be directed to this Form 10-K.Attention: Corporate Secretary, 11726 San Vicente Boulevard, Suite 650, Los Angeles, California, or by telephone at 310-826-5648.

4154


Item 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Overview of Executive Compensation Program
     The Compensation Committee of our board of directors has responsibility for establishing, implementing and monitoring our executive compensation program philosophy and practices. The Compensation Committee seeks to ensure that the total compensation paid to our named executive officers is fair, reasonable and competitive. Generally, the types of compensation and benefits provided to named executive officers are similar to those provided to our other officers.
     Throughout this Annual Report, the individuals who served as our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer during 2006, as well as the other individuals included in the Summary Compensation Table on page 60, are referred to as the “named executive officers.”
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
     The Compensation Committee believes that an effective executive compensation program should provide base annual compensation that is reasonable in relation to individual executive’s job responsibilities and reward the achievement of both annual and long-term strategic goals of our company. The Compensation Committee uses annual and other periodic cash bonuses to reward an officer’s achievement of specific goals and stock options as a retention tool and as a means to align the executive’s long-term interests with those of our stockholders, with the ultimate objective of improving stockholder value. The Compensation Committee evaluates both performance and compensation to maintain our company’s ability to attract and retain excellent employees in key positions and to assure that compensation provided to key employees remains competitive relative to the compensation paid to similarly situated executives of comparable companies. To that end, the Compensation Committee believes executive compensation packages provided by us to our named executive officers should include both cash and share-based compensation.
     Because of the size of our company, the small number of executive officers in our company, and our company’s financial priorities, the Compensation Committee has decided not to implement or offer any retirement plans, pension benefits, deferred compensation plans, or other similar plans for our executive officers. Accordingly, the components of the executive compensation consist of salary, year-end cash bonuses awarded based on the Compensation Committee’s subjective assessment of each individual executive’s job performance during the past year, stock option grants to provide executives with longer-term incentives, and occasional special compensation awards (either cash or stock options) to reward extraordinary efforts or results.
     As a biopharmaceutical company engaged in developing potential products that, to date, have not generated significant revenues and are not expected to generate significant revenues or profits for several years, the Compensation Committee also takes the company’s financial and working capital condition into account in its compensation decisions. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee historically has weighted bonuses more heavily with stock options rather than cash. The Compensation Committee may reassess the proper weighting of equity and cash compensation in light of the company’s improved working capital situation.
Role of Executive Officers in Compensation Decisions
     The Compensation Committee makes all compensation decisions for the named executive officers and approves recommendations regarding equity awards to all of our officers. Decisions regarding the non-equity compensation of other officers are made by the Chief Executive Officer.
     The Compensation Committee and the Chief Executive Officer annually review the performance of each named executive officer (other than the Chief Executive Officer, whose performance is reviewed only by

55


the Compensation Committee). The conclusions reached and recommendations based on these reviews, including with respect to salary adjustments and annual award amounts, are presented to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee can exercise its discretion in modifying any recommended adjustments or awards to executives.
Setting Executive Compensation
     Based on the foregoing objectives, the Compensation Committee has structured the Company’s annual cash and incentive-based cash and non-cash executive compensation to motivate executives to achieve the business goals set by the Company, to reward the executives for achieving such goals, and to retain the executives. In doing so, the Compensation Committee historically has not employed outside compensation consultants. However, during 2006, the Compensation Committee did obtain and use in its compensation deliberations several third-party industry compensation surveys to establish cash and equity compensation for our executive officers. The Compensation Committee utilized this data to set compensation for our executive officers at levels targeted at or around the average of the compensation amounts provided to executives at comparable companies considering, for each individual, their individual experience level related to their position with us. There is no pre-established policy or target for the allocation between either cash and non-cash incentive compensation.
2006 Executive Compensation Components
     For 2006, the principal components of compensation for the named executive officers were:
base salary;
performance-based cash compensation; and
long-term equity incentive compensation.
Base Salary
     The Company provides named executive officers and other employees with base salary to compensate them for services rendered during the year. Base salary ranges for the named executive officers are determined for each executive based on his or her position and responsibility.
     During its review of base salaries for executives, the Compensation Committee primarily considers:
the negotiated terms of each executive employment agreement;
internal review of the executive’s compensation, both individually and relative to other executive officers; and
individual performance of the executive.
     Salary levels are typically considered annually as part of the company’s performance review process, as well as upon a change in job responsibility. Merit-based increases to salaries are based on the Compensation Committee’s assessment of the individual’s performance. Base salaries for the named executive officers in 2006 were increased from the base salaries in effect during the prior year by amounts ranging from 8.75% for the Chief Executive Officer to 12.8% for the Senior Vice President of Legal Affairs. Unless increased by the Compensation Committee, the salary increase for Mr. Kriegsman will remain in effect until the expiration of his employment agreement on July 1, 2008, while the other salary increases remain in effect until the expiration of their employment agreements on December 31, 2007.

56


Performance-Based Compensation
     The Compensation Committee has not established an incentive compensation program with fixed performance targets. Because the company does not generate significant revenues and has not commercially released any products, the Compensation Committee bases its performance and achievement compensation awards on the achievement of product development targets and milestones, effective fund-raising efforts, and effective management of personnel and capital resources, among other criteria. During 2006, the Compensation Committee granted Mr. Kriegsman a special cash bonus of $200,000 in recognition of his role in negotiating our sale to the privately-funded ALS Charitable Remainder Trust of a one percent royalty in the worldwide sales of our small molecule drug candidate arimoclomol. During 2006, the Compensation Committee also granted Mr. Kriegsman an annual cash bonus of $200,000 and granted various cash bonuses to other executive officers, each in conjunction with the end of their employment contract years, because of their efforts in helping us advance the development of our products, raise working capital and achieve other corporate goals.
Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation
     As indicated above, the Compensation Committee also aims to encourage the company’s executive officers to focus on long-term company performance by allocating to them stock options that vest over a period of several years. In 2006, the Compensation Committee granted to Mr. Kriegsman a nonqualified option to purchase 200,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $1.38 per share, which equaled the closing market price on the date of grant. The option vests monthly over three years, provided that Mr. Kriegsman continues in our employ through such monthly vesting periods. In addition, in connection with entering into new employment agreements with three of the other executive officers, the Compensation Committee also granted stock options to those executive officers. All of these other stock options also had an exercise price of $1.38 per share, which equaled the closing market price on the date of grant, and also vest monthly over three years, provided that such executives remained in our employ through such monthly vesting periods.
Retirement Plans, Perquisites And Other Personal Benefits
     We currently maintain no retirement plan for the named executive officers or other employees. In addition, we do not provide any of our executive officers with any perquisites or other personal benefits, other than benefits that we offer Mr. Kriegsman provided for in his employment agreement. As required by his employment agreement, during 2006 we paid insurance premiums with respect to a life insurance policy for Mr. Kriegsman which had a face value of approximately $1.4 million as of December 31, 2006 and under which Mr. Kriegsman’s designee is the beneficiary.
     Except as follows, we do not have in effect any change of control provisions for payment to any executive officer in the event of a change in control of CytRx. Our stock option plans provide that all unvested options held by our employees, including the named executive officers, immediately vest upon a change of control. In addition, under our employment agreement with Mr. Kriegsman, and if, during the term and within two years after the date on which the change in control occurs, Mr. Kriegsman’s employment is terminated by us without “cause” or by him for “good reason” (each as defined in his employment agreement), then, to the extent that any payment or distribution of any type by us to or for the benefit of Mr. Kriegsman resulting from the termination of his employment is or will be subject to the excise tax, we have agreed to pay Mr. Kriegsman an additional amount that, after the imposition of all income, employment, excise and other taxes, penalties and interest thereon, is equal to the sum of (i) the excise tax on such payments plus (ii) any penalty and interest assessments associated with such excise tax.
Ownership Guidelines
     The Compensation Committee has no requirement that each named executive officer maintain a minimum ownership interest in our company.

57


     Our long-term incentive compensation consists of the grant of stock options to our named executive officers. The stock option program assists the company to:
establish the link between the creation of stockholder value and long-term executive incentive compensation;
provide an opportunity for increased equity ownership by executives;
function as a retention tool because of the vesting features included in all options granted by the Compensation Committee; and
maintain competitive levels of total compensation.
     We normally grant stock options to new executive officers when they join our company based upon their position with us and their relevant prior experience. The options granted by the Compensation Committee generally vest monthly over the first three years of the ten-year option term. Vesting and exercise rights cease upon termination of employment (or, in the case of exercise rights, 90 days thereafter), except in the case of death (subject to a one-year limitation), disability or retirement. Prior to the exercise of an option, the holder has no rights as a stockholder with respect to the shares subject to such option, including voting rights and the right to receive dividends or dividend equivalents. In addition to the initial option grants, our Compensation Committee may grant additional options to retain our executives and reward, or provide incentive for, the achievement of corporate goals and strong individual performance. Our Board of Directors has also granted our Chief Executive Officer discretion to grant up to 100,000 options to employees upon joining our company, and to grant an additional “discretionary pool” of up to 100,000 incentive options during each employee review cycle. Options are granted based on a combination of individual contributions to our company and on general corporate achievements, which may include the attainment of product development milestones and attaining other annual corporate goals and objectives. On an annual basis, the Compensation Committee assesses the appropriate individual and corporate goals for our new executives and provides additional option grants based upon the achievement by the new executives of both individual and corporate goals. We expect that we will continue to provide new employees with initial option grants in the future to provide long-term compensation incentives and will continue to rely on performance-based and retention grants to provide additional incentives for current employees. Additionally, in the future, the Compensation Committee may consider awarding additional or alternative forms of equity incentives, such as grants of restricted stock, restricted stock units and other performance-based awards.
     It is our policy to award stock options at an exercise price equal to the Nasdaq Capital Market’s closing price of our common stock on the date of the grant. In certain limited circumstances, the Compensation Committee may grant options to an executive at an exercise price in excess of the closing price of the common stock on the grant date. The Compensation Committee has never granted options with an exercise price that is less than the closing price of our common stock on the grant date, nor has it granted options which are priced on a date other than the grant date. For purposes of determining the exercise price of stock options, the grant date is deemed to be the date on which the Compensation Committee approves the stock option grant.
     We have no program, practice or plan to grant stock options to our executive officers, including new executive officers, in coordination with the release of material nonpublic information. We also have not timed the release of material nonpublic information for the purpose of affecting the value of stock options or other compensation to our executive officers, and we have no plan to do so.
     In light of recent changes to the SEC’s rules regarding executive compensation disclosure, during 2007 we intend to consider whether it may be advisable to adopt additional policies and procedures regarding the grant of stock options.

58


Tax and Accounting Implications
Deductibility of Executive Compensation
     As part of its role, the Compensation Committee reviews and considers the deductibility of executive compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, which provides that corporations may not deduct compensation of more than $1,000,000 that is paid to certain individuals. We believe that compensation paid to our executive officers generally is fully deductible for federal income tax purposes.
Accounting for Share-Based Compensation
     Beginning on January 1, 2006, the company began accounting for share-based compensation in accordance with the requirements of FASB Statement 123(R). This accounting treatment has not significantly affected our compensation decisions. The Compensation Committee takes into consideration the tax consequences of compensation to the named executive officers, but tax considerations are not a significant part of the company’s compensation policy.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation in Compensation Decisions
     There are no “interlocks,” as defined by the SEC, with respect to any member of the compensation committee. Joseph Rubinfeld, Ph.D., Marvin R. Selter and Richard L. Wennekamp are the current members of the Compensation Committee.
Compensation Committee Report
     The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K and, based on such review and discussions, has recommended to our board of directors that the foregoing “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” be included in this Annual Report.
Joseph Rubinfeld, Ph.D., ChairmanMarvin R. SelterRichard L. Wennekamp

59


Summary Compensation Table
     The following table presents summary information concerning all compensation paid or accrued by us for services rendered in all capacities during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 20032006 by Steven A. Kriegsman and Matthew Natalizio, who are the only individuals who served as our Presidentprincipal executive and Chief Executive Officer,financial officers during the year ended December 31, 2006, and the fourour three other most highly compensated executive officers:officers who were serving as executive officers as of December 31, 2006:
                     
              Long-Term  
              Compensation  
              Securities  
              Underlying All Other
Name and Principal Position Year Salary Bonus Options (#) Compensation
Steven A. Kriegsman  2005  $399,403  $250,000   300,000(1) $11,000(2)
President and Chief Executive Officer  2004  $361,173  $150,000     $42,617(3)
   2003  $313,772  $150,000   1,000,000(4)   
Jack R. Barber, Ph.D.  2005  $238,132  $50,000   150,000(1)   
Senior Vice President — Drug Development  2004(5) $112,910      $100,000(6)   
Mark A. Tepper, Ph.D.  2005  $214,285  $50,000       
Senior Vice President — Drug Discovery  2004  $200,699  $50,000       
   2003(7) $58,333  $   400,000(6)   
Matthew Natalizio  2005  $184,167  $50,000   150,000(1)   
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer  2004(8) $82,900  $   100,000(6)   
Benjamin S. Levin  2005  $184,167  $50,000   150,000(1)   
General Counsel, Vice President — Legal Affairs and Corporate Secretary  2004(9) $80,881  $   160,000(6)   
Summary Compensation Table
                     
              Option  
          Bonus Awards Total
Name and Position Year Salary ($)��($) (1) ($) (2) ($)
Steven A. Kriegsman
President and Chief Executive Officer
  2006   417,175   400,000   340,426   1,157,601 
                     
Matthew Natalizio
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
  2006   204,115   43,000   78,472   325,587 
                     
Jack R. Barber, Ph.D.
Chief Scientific Officer
  2006   261,750   68,750   90,544   421,044 
                     
Benjamin S. Levin
General Counsel, Vice President – Legal Affairs and Secretary
  2006   208,170   68,750   120,550   397,470 
                     
Mark A. Tepper, Ph.D.
Senior Vice President – Drug Discovery
  2006   249,093      205,777   454,870 
 
(1) Bonuses to the named executive officers reported above were paid in June 2006, which corresponded to the end of the contractual employment year for those officers. For future years, we plan to determine and award bonuses at the fiscal year end, and we will report any bonuses awarded for the latter half of 2006 when made in a Current Report on Form 8-K.
(2)The values shown in this column represent the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes with respect to the 2006 fiscal year for the fair value of stock options granted in 2006 and prior fiscal years in accordance with SFAS 123(R). Pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts shown are subjectexclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. The amount recognized for these awards was calculated using the Black Scholes option-pricing model, and reflect grants from our 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which is described in Note 13 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

60


2006 Grants of Plan-Based Awards
     In 2006, we granted stock options to our named executive officers under our 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan as follows:
2006 Grants of Plan-Based Awards
                 
      All Other     Grant Date
      Option Awards Exercise Price of Fair Value of
      (# of CytRx Option Awards Option Awards
Name Grant Date Shares) ($/Sh) ($)
Steven A. Kriegsman  6/16/2006   200,000  $1.38  $236,000 
President and Chief Executive Officer                
                 
Matthew Natalizio  6/16/2006   50,000  $1.38  $59,000 
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer                
                 
Jack R. Barber, Ph.D.  6/16/2006   100,000  $1.38  $118,000 
Chief Scientific Officer                
                 
Benjamin S. Levin  6/16/2006   90,000  $1.38  $106,200 
General Counsel, Vice President – Legal Affairs and Secretary                
                 
Mark A. Tepper, Ph.D.            
Senior Vice President – Drug Discovery                
2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan
     The purpose of our 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan is to promote our success and enhance our value by linking the personal interests of our employees, officers, consultants and directors to those of our stockholders, and by providing our employees, officers, consultants and directors with an incentive for outstanding performance. The Plan was originally adopted by our board of directors on August 24, 2000 and by our stockholders on June 7, 2001, with certain amendments to the Plan having been subsequently approved by our board of directors and stockholders.
     The Plan authorizes the granting of awards to our employees, officers, consultants and directors and to employees, officers, consultants and directors of our subsidiaries. The following awards are available under the Plan:
options to purchase shares of common stock, which may be incentive stock options or non-qualified stock options;
stock appreciation rights;
restricted stock;
performance units;
dividend equivalents; and
other stock-based awards.
     The aggregate number of shares of our common stock reserved and available for awards under the Plan is 10,000,000 shares. As of February 28, 2007, there were 6,749,000 shares previously issued or subject to outstanding Plan awards, and 2,822,750 shares were reserved for issuance pursuant to future awards under the Plan. The maximum number of shares of common stock with respect to one or more options and stock appreciation rights that we may grant during any one calendar year under the Plan to any one participant is 1,000,000; except that in connection with his or her initial employment with the company or an affiliate, a participant may be granted options for up to an additional 1,000,000 shares. The maximum fair market value of any awards that any one participant may receive during any one calendar year under the Plan is $1,000,000, not including the value of options and stock appreciation rights (less any consideration paid by the participant

61


for such award). We also have two other plans, the 1994 Stock Option Plan and the 1998 Long Term Incentive Plan, which include 9,167 and 100,041 shares subject to outstanding stock options. As the terms of the plans provide that no options may be issued after 10 years, no options are available under the 1994 Plan. Under the 1998 Long Term Incentive Plan, 29,517 shares are available for future grant.
Administration
     The Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of our board of directors. The Compensation Committee has the power, authority and discretion to:
designate participants;
determine the types of awards to grant to each participant and the number, terms and conditions of any award;
establish, adopt or revise any rules and regulations as it may deem necessary or advisable to administer the Plan; and
make all other decisions and determinations that may be required under, or as the Compensation Committee deems necessary or advisable to administer, the Plan.
Awards
     The following is summary description of financial instruments that may be granted to participants by the Compensation Committee of our board of directors. The Compensation Committee to date has only granted stock options to participants in the Plan.
Stock Options. The Compensation Committee is authorized to grant both incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options. The terms of any incentive stock option must meet the requirements of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code. The exercise price of an option may not be less than the fair market value of the underlying stock on the date of grant, and no option may have a term of more than 10 years from the grant date.
Stock Appreciation Rights. The Compensation Committee may grant stock appreciation rights to participants. Upon the exercise of a stock appreciation right, the participant has the right to receive the excess, if any, of (1) the fair market value of one share of common stock on the date of exercise, over (2) the grant price of the stock appreciation right as determined by the Compensation Committee, which will not be less than the fair market value of one share of common stock on the date of grant.
Restricted Stock. The Compensation Committee may make awards of restricted stock, which will be subject to such restrictions on transferability and other restrictions as the Compensation Committee may impose (including limitations on the right to vote restricted stock or the right to receive dividends, if any, on the restricted stock).
Performance Units. The Compensation Committee may grant performance units on such terms and conditions as may be selected by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee will have the complete discretion to determine the number of performance units granted to each participant and to set performance goals and other terms or conditions to payment of the performance units which, depending on the extent to which they are met, will determine the number and value of performance units that will be paid to the participant.
Dividend Equivalents. The Compensation Committee is authorized to grant dividend equivalents to participants subject to such terms and conditions as may be selected by the Compensation Committee. Dividend equivalents entitle the participant to receive payments equal to dividends with respect to all or a portion of the number of shares of common stock subject to an option or other award, as determined by the

62


Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee may provide that dividend equivalents be paid or distributed when accrued or be deemed to have been reinvested in additional shares of common stock, or otherwise reinvested.
Other Stock-Based Awards. The Compensation Committee may grant other awards that are payable in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on or related to shares of common stock, as deemed by the Compensation Committee to be consistent with the purposes of the Plan. These stock-based awards may include shares of common stock awarded as a bonus and not subject to any restrictions or conditions, convertible or exchangeable debt securities, other rights convertible or exchangeable into shares of common stock, and awards valued by reference to book value of shares of common stock or the value of securities of or the performance of our subsidiaries. The Compensation Committee will determine the terms and conditions of any such awards.
Performance Goals.The Compensation Committee in its discretion may determine awards based on:
the achievement by CytRx or a parent or subsidiary of a specific financial target;
CytRx’s stock price;
the achievement by an individual or a business unit of CytRx or a subsidiary of a specific financial target;
the achievement of specific goals with respect to (i) product development milestones, (ii) corporate financings, (iii) merger and acquisition activities, (iv) licensing transactions, (v) development of strategic partnerships or alliances, or (vi) acquisition or development of new technologies; and
any combination of the goals set forth above.
     The Compensation Committee has the right for any reason to reduce (but not increase) any award, even if a specific goal has been achieved. If an award is made on the basis of the achievement of a goal, the Compensation Committee must have established the goal before the beginning of the period for which the performance goal relates (or a later date as may be permitted under Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m)). Any payment of an award for achieving a goal will be conditioned on the written certification of the Compensation Committee in each case that the goals and any other material conditions were satisfied.
Limitations on Transfer; Beneficiaries. Awards under the Plan may not be transferred or assigned by Plan participants other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution and, in the case of an incentive stock option, pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order, provided that the Compensation Committee may (but need not) permit other transfers where the Compensation Committee concludes that such transferability (1) does not result in accelerated taxation, (2) does not cause any option intended to be an incentive stock option to fail to qualify as such, and (3) is otherwise appropriate and desirable, taking into account any factors deemed relevant, including any state or federal tax or securities laws or regulations applicable to transferable awards. A Plan participant may, in the manner determined by the Compensation Committee, designate a beneficiary to exercise the participant’s rights and to receive any distribution with respect to any award upon the participant’s death.
Acceleration Upon Certain Events. In the event of a “Change in Control” of CytRx, which is a term defined in the Plan, all outstanding options and other awards in the nature of rights that may be exercised will become fully vested and exercisable and all restrictions on all outstanding awards will lapse. The Compensation Committee may, however, in its sole discretion declare all outstanding options, stock appreciation rights and other awards in the nature of rights that may be exercised to become fully vested and exercisable, and all restrictions on all outstanding awards to lapse, in each case as of such date as the

63


Compensation Committee may, in its sole discretion, declare. The Compensation Committee may discriminate among participants or among awards in exercising such discretion.
Termination and Amendment
     Our board of directors or the Compensation Committee may, at any time and from time to time, terminate or amend the Plan without stockholder approval; provided, however, that our board or the Compensation Committee may condition any amendment on the approval of our stockholders if such approval is necessary or deemed advisable with respect to tax, securities or other applicable laws, policies or regulations. No termination or amendment of the Plan may adversely affect any award previously granted without the written consent of the participants affected. The Compensation Committee may amend any outstanding award without the approval of the participants affected, except that no such amendment may diminish the value of an award determined as if it has been exercised, vested, cashed in or otherwise settled on the date of such amendment, and, except as otherwise permitted in the Plan, the exercise price of any option may not be reduced and the original term of any option may not be extended.
Holdings of Previously Awarded Equity
     Equity awards held as of December 31, 2006 by each of our named executive officers were issued under our 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The following table sets forth outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers as of December 31, 2006:
2006 Outstanding Equity Awards at Year-End
                     
  Option Awards
  Number of    
  Securities    
  Underlying    
  Unexercised Option  
  Options Exercise Option
  (#) Price Expiration
Name Exercisable Unexercisable ($) Date
Steven A. Kriegsman  33,380   (1)  166,620   1.38   6/16/16 
President and Chief Executive  158,317   (1)  141,683   .79   5/17/15 
Officer  250,000   (2)     2.47   6/20/13 
   750,000   (2)     2.47   6/20/13 
                     
Matthew Natalizio  8,345   (1)  41,655   1.38   6/16/16 
Chief Financial Officer and  79,159   (1)  70,841   .79   5/17/15 
Treasurer  66,667   (2)  33,333   1.11   7/12/14 
                     
Jack R. Barber, Ph.D.  16,690   (1)  83,310   1.38   6/16/16 
Chief Scientific Officer  79,159   (1)  70,841   .79   5/17/15 
   66,667   (2)  33,333   1.13   7/06/14 
                     
Benjamin S. Levin  15,021   (1)  74,979   1.38   6/16/16 
General Counsel, Vice  79,159   (1)  70,841   .79   5/17/15 
President – Legal Affairs and  106,667   (2)  53,333   1.39   7/15/14 
Secretary                    
                     
Mark A. Tepper, Ph.D.  280,000   (2)     2.41   9/16/13 
Senior Vice President – Drug  120,000   (2)     2.41   10/09/13 
Discovery                    
(1)These options vest in 36 equal monthly installments, beginning on May 17, 2005, subject to the option holder’s remaining in our continuous employ through such dates.
 
(2) The amount shown includes approximately $5,000These options vest in insurance premiums paid by us with respect to a life insurance policy for Mr. Kriegsman with a face value of approximately $1.4 million and under which Mr. Kriegsman’s designee is the beneficiary. The amount shown also includes approximately $6,000 of legal fees and expenses paid or reimbursed by us in accordance with the terms of Mr. Kriegsman’s employment agreement described below under “Employment Agreement with Steven A. Kriegsman.”
(3)The amount shown includes approximately $5,000 in insurance premiums paid by us with respectthree annual installments, subject to the life insurance policy for Mr. Kriegsman referred to in note (2) above. The amount shown also includes approximately $37,617 of legal fees and expenses paid or reimbursed by us in accordance with the terms of Mr. Kriegsman’s employment agreement described below under “Employment Agreement with Steven A. Kriegsman.”
(4)250,000 of the options shown vested on each of June 20, 2003 and June 20, 2004. The remaining 500,000 of the options shown vest in twenty-four monthly installments of 1/24th each on the 20th day of each month beginning on June 20, 2004, subject to Mr. Kriegsman’soption holder’s remaining in our continuous employ through such dates.
(5)Dr. Barber was hired on July 6, 2004.
(6)The options shown are subject to vesting in three annual installments of 1/3rd each on each of the first three anniversaries of the named executive officer’s date of hire, subject to his remaining in our continuous employ through such dates.
(7)Dr. Tepper was hired on September 20, 2003.
(8)Mr. Natalizio was hired on July 12, 2004.

42


(9)Mr. Levin was hired on July 15, 2004.
Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year
     The following table contains information concerning grants of stock options during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 to the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table:
Option Grants in Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2005
                     
  Individual Grants     Potential Realizeable Value
  Number of % of Total     at Assumed Annual Rates
  Shares Options     of Stock Price
  Underlying Granted to     Appreciation for Option
  Options Employees In Exercise Term(1)  
Name Granted Fiscal Year Price 5% 10%
Steven A. Kriegsman  300,000   28.6% $0.79  $266,300  $564,500 
Jack R. Barber, Ph.D.  150,000   14.3% $0.79  $133,200  $282,200 
Mark A. Tepper, Ph.D.          $  $ 
Matthew Natalizio  150,000   14.3% $0.79  $133,200  $282,200 
Benjamin S. Levin  150,000   14.3% $0.79  $133,200  $282,200 
(1)The potential realizable value shown in this table represents the hypothetical gain that might be realized based on assumed 5% and 10% annual compound rates of stock price appreciation over the full option term. These prescribed rates are not intended to forecast possible future appreciation of the common stock.
Fiscal Year-End Option Values
     The following table sets forth the number of options and total value of unexercised in-the-money options and warrants at December 31, 2005 for the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table, using the price per share of our common stock of $1.03 on December 30, 2005. During 2005, Mr. Kriegsman exercised warrants to purchase 459,352 shares of our common stock.
                 
  Number of Securities  
  Underlying Unexercised Value of Unexercised
  Options at In-the-Money Options at
  December 31, 2005 (#) December 31, 2005 ($)
Name Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable
Steven A. Kriegsman  850,000   450,000  $14,000  $58,000 
Jack R. Barber, Ph.D.  62,500   187,500  $7,000  $29,000 
Mark A. Tepper, Ph.D.  266,680   133,320  $  $ 
Matthew Natalizio  62,500   187,500  $7,000  $29,000 
Benjamin S. Levin  82,495   227,505  $7,000  $29,000 
Compensation of Directors
     Periodically, our board of directors reviews our director compensation policies and, from time to time, makes changes to such policies based on various criteria the board deems relevant. During 2005, directors who were employees of our company received no compensation for their service as directors or as members of board committees.
     Effective October 1, 2005, our non-employee directors receive a quarterly retainer of $2,000 ($8,000 for the Chairman of the Board), a fee of $2,000 for each board meeting attended ($750 for meetings attended by teleconference and for board actions taken by unanimous written consent) and $1,000 for each committee meeting attended. Non-employee directors who serve as the Chairman a Board committee receive an additional $1,500 for each meeting attended as the Chairman of the Nomination and Governance Committee or the Compensation

4364


Committee and an additional $2,000 for each meeting attended as the Chairman of the Audit Committee. Prior to October 2005, our non-employee directors received a quarterly retainer of $1,500, a fee of $1,500 for each board meeting attended ($750 for meetings attended by teleconference and for board actions taken by unanimous written consent) and $750 for each committee meeting attended. Non-employee directors who served as Chairman of a Board committee received an additional $500 for each meeting attended as the Chairman of the Nomination and Governance Committee or the Compensation Committee and an additional $1,000 for each meeting attended as the Chairman of the Audit Committee. We grant options to purchase 15,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price equal to the current market value of our common stock to each non-employee director annually, usually in the summer of each year. Past option grants were made subject to vesting in annual increments of 1/3rd each, subject to the director remaining as a director.
Equity Compensation Plans
          The following table sets forth certain information as of December 31, 2005 regarding securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans.
             
          (c) 
  (a)      Number of Securities 
  Number of Securities  (b)  Remaining Available 
  to be Issued Upon  Weighted-Average  for Issuance Under Equity 
  Exercise of  Exercise Price of  Compensation 
  Outstanding Options,  Outstanding Options,  Plans (Excluding Securities 
Plan Category Warrants and Rights  Warrants and Rights  Reflected in Column (a)) 
Equity compensation plans approved by our stockholders:            
1994 Stock Option Plan  30,834  $1.00   70,850 
1995 Stock Option Plan        22,107 
1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan  132,541   1.00   29,517 
2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan  6,042,167   1.71   3,957,833 
Equity compensation plans not approved by our stockholders:            
Outstanding warrants(1)  5,029,822   1.47    
          
Total:  11,235,364  $1.59   4,080,307 
          
(1)Issued as compensation for various services and does not include warrants attached to common stock that were sold in private placement transactions.
Perquisites
          In general, we afford our directors and executive officers no perquisites apart from the compensation and stock option benefits described above and any benefits specifically provided for under the terms of any employment agreement as described below. We do, however, bear the cost of outside counsel employed by us to assist directors and executive officers in preparing reports of changes in beneficial ownership under Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and other Section 16 compliance matters. We also permit Mr. Kriegsman, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and our directors to fly first-class for business travel, which is an exception to our usual practice for business travel by our officers and employees.
Employment Agreements;Agreements and Potential Payment upon Termination or Change in Control Agreements
     Employment Agreement with Steven A. Kriegsman
     Mr. Kriegsman is employed as our Chief Executive Officer and President pursuant to an employment agreement that was amended and restated as of May 17, 2005 to continue through July 1, 2008. As an incentive to enter the amended and restated employment agreement, Mr. Kriegsman was granted as of May 17, 2005, a ten-year, nonqualified option under our 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan to purchase 300,000 shares of our common stock at a price of

44


$0.79 per share. The employment agreement will automatically renew in July 2008 for an additional one-year period, unless either Mr. Kriegsman or we elect not to renew it.
     Under his employment agreement, Mr. Kriegsman is entitled to receive an annual base salary of $400,000. Our board of directors (or its Compensation Committee) will review the base salary annually and may increase (but not decrease) it in its sole discretion. On June 16, 2006, our Compensation Committee completed its annual review of Mr. Kriegsman’s compensation, and we increased his annual base salary to $435,000, effective July 1, 2006. In addition to his annual salary, Mr. Kriegsman is eligible to receive an annual bonus as determined by our board of directors (or its Compensation Committee) in its sole discretion, but not to be less than $150,000. Pursuant to his employment agreement with us, we have agreed that he shall serve on a full-time basis as our Chief Executive Officer and President and that he may continue to serve as Chairman of the Kriegsman Group only so long as necessary to complete certain current assignments.
     Mr. Kriegsman is eligible to receive grants of options to purchase shares of our common stock. The number and terms of those options, including the vesting schedule, will be determined by our board of directors (or its Compensation Committee) in its sole discretion.
     Under Mr. Kriegsman’s employment agreement, we have agreed that, if he is made a party, or threatened to be made a party, to a suit or proceeding by reason of his service to us, we will indemnify and hold him harmless from all costs and expenses to the fullest extent permitted or authorized by our certificate of incorporation or bylaws, or any resolution of our board of directors, to the extent not inconsistent with Delaware law. We also have agreed to advance to Mr. Kriegsman such costs and expenses upon his request if he undertakes to repay such advances if it ultimately is determined that he is not entitled to indemnification with respect to the same. These employment agreement provisions are not exclusive of any other rights to indemnification to which Mr. Kriegsman may be entitled and are in addition to any rights he may have under any policy of insurance maintained by us.
     In the event we terminate Mr. Kriegsman’s employment without “cause” (as defined), or if Mr. Kriegsman terminates his employment with “good reason” (as defined), (i) we have agreed to pay Mr. Kriegsman a lump-sum equal to his salary and prorated minimum annual bonus through to his date of termination, plus his salary and minimum annual bonus for a period of two years after his termination date, or until the expiration of the amended and restated employment agreement, whichever is later, (ii) he will be entitled to immediate vesting of all stock options or other awards based on our equity securities, and (iii) he will also be entitled to continuation of his life insurance premium payments and continued participation in any of our health plans through to the later of the expiration of the amended and restated employment agreement or 24 months following his termination date. Mr. Kriegsman will have no obligation in such events to seek new employment or offset the severance payments to him by the Company by any compensation received from any subsequent reemployment by another employer.
     Under Mr. Kriegsman’s employment agreement, he and his affiliated company, The Kriegsman Group, are to provide us during the term of his employment with the first opportunity to conduct or take action with respect to any acquisition opportunity or any other potential transaction identified by them within the biotech, pharmaceutical or health care industries and that is within the scope of the business plan adopted by our board of directors. Mr. Kriegsman’s employment agreement also contains confidentiality provisions relating to our trade secrets and any other proprietary or confidential information, which provisions shall remain in effect for five years after the expiration of the employment agreement with respect to proprietary or confidential information and for so long as our trade secrets remain trade secrets.

65


     Potential Paymenta upon Termination or Change in Control Agreement withfor Steven A. Kriegsman
     Mr. Kriegsman’s employment agreement contains no provision for payment to him in the event of a change in control of CytRx. If, however, a change in control (as defined in our 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan) occurs during the term of the employment agreement, and if, during the term and within two years after the date on which the change in control occurs, Mr. Kriegsman’s employment is terminated by us without cause or by him for good reason (each as defined in his employment agreement), then, in addition to the severance benefits described above, to the extent that any payment or distribution of any type by us to or for the benefit of Mr. Kriegsman resulting from the termination of his employment is or will be subject to the excise tax imposed under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, we have agreed to pay Mr. Kriegsman, prior to the time the excise tax is payable with respect to any such payment (through

45


withholding or otherwise), an additional amount that, after the imposition of all income, employment, excise and other taxes, penalties and interest thereon, is equal to the sum of (i) the excise tax on such payments plus (ii) any penalty and interest assessments associated with such excise tax.
     Employment Agreement with Matthew Natalizio
     Matthew Natalizio is employed as our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer pursuant to an employment agreement that was amended and restated as of May 17, 2005,June 16, 2006, to continue through July 1, 2006.December 31, 2007. Mr. Natalizio is entitled under his amended and restated employment agreement to receive an annual base salary of $195,000$215,000 and is eligible to receive an annual bonus as determined by our board of directors (or its Compensation Committee) in its sole discretion. As an incentive to enter the amended and restated employment agreement, Mr. Natalizio was granted as of May 17, 2005,June 16, 2006, a ten-year, nonqualified option under our 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan to purchase 150,00050,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $0.79$1.38 per share. This option will vest as to 1/36th of the shares covered thereby each month after the date of the employment agreement, provided that Mr. Natalizio remains in our continuous employ.
     In the event we terminate Mr. Natalizio’s employment without cause (as defined), we have agreed to pay him a lump-sum equal to his accrued but unpaid salary and vacation, plus an amount equal to three months’ salary under his employment agreement.
     Employment Agreement with Jack R. Barber, Ph.D.
     Jack R. Barber, Ph.D. is employed as our Senior Vice President — Drug DevelopmentChief Scientific Officer pursuant to an employment agreement that was amended and restated as of May 17, 2005June 16, 2006, to continue through July 1, 2006.December 31, 2007. Dr. Barber is entitled under his amended and restated employment agreement to receive an annual base salary of $250,000$275,000 and is eligible to receive an annual bonus as determined by our board of directors (or its Compensation Committee) in its sole discretion. As an incentive to enter the amended and restated employment agreement, Dr. Barber was granted as of May 17, 2005,June 16, 2006, a ten-year, nonqualified option under our 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan to purchase 150,000100,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $0.79$1.38 per share. This option will vest as to 1/36th of the shares covered thereby each month after the date of the employment agreement, provided that Dr. Barber remains in our continuous employ.
     In the event we terminate Dr. Barber’s employment without cause (as defined), we have agreed to pay him a lump-sum equal to his accrued but unpaid salary and vacation, plus an amount equal to three months’ salary under his employment agreement.
     Employment Agreement with Mark A. Tepper, Ph.D.
     Mark A. Tepper, Ph.D., is employed as our Senior Vice President — Drug Discovery pursuant toon a month-to-month basis following the expiration of an employment agreement effective as of September 17, 2005 to continue throughon September 17, 2006. Under his employment agreement, Dr. Tepper is entitled topaid an annual base salary of $250,000 and is eligible to receive an annual bonus as determined by our board of directors (or its Compensation Committee) in its sole discretion.

66


     In the event Dr. Tepper’s employment is terminated without cause (as defined), we have agreed to continue to pay Dr. Tepper his salary and other employee benefits for a period of six months following his termination.
     Employment Agreement with Benjamin S. Levin
     Benjamin S. Levin is employed as our Vice President — Legal Affairs, General Counsel and Secretary pursuant to an employment agreement that was amended and restated as of May 17, 2005June 16, 2006, to continue through July 1, 2006.December 31, 2007. Mr. Levin is entitled under his amended and restated employment agreement to receive an annual base salary of $195,000$220,000 and is eligible to receive an annual bonus as determined by our board of directors (or its Compensation Committee) in its sole discretion. As an incentive to enter the amended and restated employment agreement, Mr. Levin was granted as of May 17, 2005,June 16, 2006, a ten-year, nonqualified option under our 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan to purchase 150,00090,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $0.79$1.38 per share. This option will vest as to 1/36th of the shares

46


covered thereby each month after the date of the employment agreement, provided that Mr. Levin remains in our continuous employ.
     In the event we terminate Mr. Levin’s employment without cause (as defined), we have agreed to pay him a lump-sum equal to his accrued but unpaid salary and vacation, plus an amount equal to three months’ salary under his employment agreement.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation in Compensation DecisionsRXi Employment Agreements
     There are no “interlocks,”CytRx and RXi have entered into an employment agreement with Tod Woolf, Ph.D. dated February 22, 2007, under which Dr. Woolf is engaged to continue his employment as definedRXi’s President and Chief Executive Officer through December 31, 2008. Dr. Woolf is entitled under his employment agreement to receive an annual base salary of $250,000 and, upon RXi’s initial funding, will be granted by the SEC, with respectRXi a ten-year option to any memberpurchase a number of shares of RXi common stock equal to 3/70ths of the number of RXi shares held by CytRx immediately prior to the initial funding at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the shares at the time of grant. This option will vest in equal monthly installments over three years, subject to accelerated vesting in certain events.
     In the event Dr. Woolf’s employment is terminated without “cause” (as defined) or Dr. Woolf terminates his employment for “good reason” (as defined), RXi has agreed to pay him a lump sum equal to his base salary for the longer of twelve months and the remainder of the term of his employment agreement, but in no event less than $125,000.
     Under Dr. Woolf’s employment agreement, CytRx agrees to indemnify and hold Dr. Woolf and IPIFINI, Inc., an entity affiliated with him, harmless for any claims which arise from his services as RXi’s President and Chief Executive Officer prior to the effective date of his employment agreement.
     RXi may seek to negotiate and enter into written employment agreements with one or more of its other officers following RXi’s initial funding. The terms of such employment agreements have not been determined, and there is no assurance as to whether or on what terms RXi will be able to enter into such employment agreements.
Quantification of Termination Payments and Benefits
     The table below reflects the amount of compensation to each of our named executive officers in the event of termination of such executive’s employment by his voluntary resignation or termination, by a termination of the executive’s employment without “cause” or his resignation for “good reason,” termination following a change in control and in the event of the executive’s permanent disability or death of the executive is shown below. The amounts assume that such termination was effective as of December 31, 2006, and thus includes amounts earned through such time and are estimates of the amounts which would be paid out to the executives upon their termination. The actual amounts to be paid out can only be determined at the time of such executive’s separation.

67


Termination Payments and Benefits
                       
  Termination w/o Cause or for
  Good Reason
    Before Change in After Change in     Disability Change in
Name Benefit Control ($) Control ($) Death ($) $ Control ($)
Steven A. Kriegsman
 Severance Payment
  870,000   870,000   870,000   870,000    
President and Chief Executive
 Stock Options (1)
  246,993      246,993   246,993   246,993 
Officer Health Insurance (2)
  45,704   45,704   45,704   45,704    
  Life Insurance
  11,350   11,350      11,350    
  Bonus
  300,000   300,000   300,000   300,000    
  Tax Gross Up (3)     0          
                       
Matthew Natalizio
 Severance Payment
  53,750   53,750          
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
 Stock Options (1)              128,086 
                       
Jack R. Barber, Ph.D.
 Severance Payment
  68,750   68,750          
Chief Scientific Officer Stock Options (1)              149,496 
                       
Benjamin S. Levin
 Severance Payment
  110,000   110,000          
General Counsel, Vice President –
 Stock Options (1)              146,814 
Legal Affairs and Secretary                      
                       
Mark A. Tepper, Ph.D.
 Severance Payment
  125,000   125,000          
Senior Vice President – Drug
 Health Insurance (2)
  7,338   7,338          
Discovery Stock Options (1)               
(1)Represents the aggregate value of stock options that vest and become exercisable immediately upon each of the triggering events listed as if such events took place on December 31, 2006, determined by the aggregate difference between the stock price as of December 31, 2006 and the exercise prices of the underlying options.
(2)Represents the cost as of December 31, 2006 for the family health benefits provided to Messrs. Kriegsman and Tepper for periods of two years and six months, respectively.
(3)Mr. Kriegsman’s employment agreement provides that if a change in control (as defined in our 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan) occurs during the term of the employment agreement, and if, during the term and within two years after the date on which the change in control occurs, Mr. Kriegsman’s employment is terminated by us without cause or by him for good reason (each as defined in his employment agreement), then, to the extent that any payment or distribution of any type by us to or for the benefit of Mr. Kriegsman resulting from the termination of his employment is or will be subject to the excise tax imposed under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, we will pay Mr. Kriegsman, prior to the time the excise tax is payable with respect to any such payment (through withholding or otherwise), an additional amount that, after the imposition of all income, employment, excise and other taxes, penalties and interest thereon, is equal to the sum of (i) the excise tax on such payments plus (ii) any penalty and interest assessments associated with such excise tax. Based on Mr. Kriegsman’s past compensation and the estimated payment that would result from a termination of his employment following a change in control, we have estimated that a gross-up payment would not be required.

68


Compensation of Directors
     The following table sets forth the compensation paid to our directors other than our Chief Executive Officer for 2006:
Director Compensation Table
             
  Fees Earned or Option  
  Paid in Cash Awards Total
Name (1) ($) (2) ($) (3) ($)
Max Link, Ph.D.  48,250   37,772   86,022 
Chairman            
             
Marvin R. Selter  63,250   37,772   101,022 
Vice Chairman            
             
Louis Ignarro, Ph.D.  8,000   37,772   45,772 
Director            
             
Joseph Rubinfeld, Ph.D.  45,500   37,772   83,272 
Director            
             
Richard Wennekamp  48,250   37,772   86,022 
Director            
(1)Steven A. Kriegsman does not receive additional compensation for his role as a Director. For information relating to Mr. Kriegsman’s compensation as President and Chief Executive Officer, see the Summary Compensation Table above.
(2)The amounts in this column represent cash payments made to Non-Employee Directors for attendance at meetings during the year.
(3)In July 2006, we granted stock options to purchase 25,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price equal to the current market value of our common stock to each non-employee director. The values shown in this column represent the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes with respect to the 2006 fiscal year for the fair value of stock options granted in 2006 and prior fiscal years in accordance with SFAS 123(R). Pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. The amount recognized for these awards was calculated using the Black Scholes option-pricing model, and reflect grants from our 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which is described in Note 13 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
     We use a combination of cash and stock-based compensation to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on our board of directors. Directors who also are employees of our company currently receive no compensation for their service as directors or as members of board committees. In setting director compensation, we consider the significant amount of time that directors dedicate to the fulfillment of their director responsibilities, as well as the competency and skills required of members of our board. The directors’ current compensation schedule has been in place since July 2006. The directors’ annual compensation year begins with the annual election of directors at the annual meeting of stockholders. The annual retainer year period has been in place for directors since 2003. Periodically, our board of directors reviews our director compensation policies and, from time to time, makes changes to such policies based on various criteria the board deems relevant.
     Our non-employee directors receive a quarterly retainer of $2,500 ($8,500 for the Chairman of the Board and $7,500 for the Chairman of the Audit Committee), a fee of $2,000 for each board meeting attended ($750 for meetings attended by teleconference and for board actions taken by unanimous written consent) and $1,000 for each committee meeting attended. Non-employee directors who serve as the chairman of a board

69


committee receive an additional $1,500 for each meeting of the nomination and governance committee or the compensation committee attended and an additional $2,000 for each meeting attended of the audit committee. Joseph Rubinfeld, Ph.D., Marvin R. Selter and Richard L. Wennekamp areIn July 2006, we granted stock options to purchase 25,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price equal to the current membersmarket value of the compensation committee.our common stock to each non-employee director. The options were vested, in full, upon grant.
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder MattersSECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
     Based solely upon information made available to us, the following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 10, 200623, 2007 by (1) each person who is known by us to beneficially own more than five percent of our common stock; (2) each director;of our directors; (3) the named executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table under Item 11; and (4) all of our executive officers and directors as a group.
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the SEC rules. Shares of common stock subject to any warrants or options that are presently exercisable, or exercisable within 60 days of March 10, 200623, 2007 (which are indicated by footnote) are deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of the person holding the warrants or options, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. The percentage ownership reflected in the table is based on 69,515,86776,788,694 shares of our common stock outstanding as of March 10, 2006.23, 2007. Except as otherwise indicated, the holders listed below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown, subject to applicable community property laws. An asterisk represents beneficial ownership of less than 1%.
                
 Shares of Shares of
 Common Stock Common Stock
Name of Beneficial Owner Number Percent Number Percent
Louis Ignarro, Ph.D.(1) 465,583 *  503,916 * 
Steven A. Kriegsman(2) 5,050,265  7.16% 5,282,230  6.8%
Max Link(3) 60,417 *  97,083 * 
Joseph Rubinfeld(4) 23,667 *  62,000 * 
Marvin R. Selter(5) 369,118 *  407,451 * 
Richard Wennekamp(6) 16,667 *  55,000 * 
Matthew Natalizio(7) 79,168 *  181,945 * 
Jack R. Barber(8) 79,168 *  197,232 * 
Mark A. Tepper(9) 266,676 *  400,000 * 
Benjamin S. Levin(10) 99,168 *  234,175 * 
All executive officers and directors as a group (ten persons)(11) 6,509,897  9.10%
All executive officers and directors as a group (eleven persons)(11) 7,421,032  9.3%
 
(1) Includes 373,667412,000 shares subject to options or warrants.
 
(2) Includes 1,029,1651,261,130 shares subject to options or warrants. Mr. Kriegsman’s address is c/o CytRx Corporation, 11726 San Vicente Boulevard, Suite 650, Los Angeles, CA 90049.
 
(3) Includes 31,21067,876 shares subject to options or warrants.
 
(4) Includes 23,66762,000 shares subject to options or warrants.
 
(5) The shares shown are owned, of record, by the Selter Family Trust or Selter IRA Rollover. Includes 11,66750,000 shares subject to options or warrants owned by Mr. Selter.

47


(6) Includes 11,66750,000 shares subject to options or warrants.
 
(7) Includes 79,168181,945 shares subject to options or warrants.
 
(8) Includes 79,168197,232 shares subject to options or warrants.

70


(9) Includes 266,676400,000 shares subject to options or warrants.
 
(10) Includes 99,168234,175 shares subject to options or warrants.
 
(11) Includes 2,005,2232,916,358 shares subject to options or warrants.
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related TransactionsCERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
     RXi was incorporated jointly in April 2006 by CytRx and the four current members of RXi’s scientific advisory board for the purpose of pursuing the possible development or acquisition of RNAi-related technologies and assets. As described elsewhere in this Annual Report, we recently have entered into the following agreements with RXi:
Contribution Agreement
     On January 8, 2007, we entered into a Contribution Agreement with RXi under which we assigned and contributed to RXi substantially all of our RNAi-related technologies and assets. The assigned assets consisted primarily of our licenses from UMMS and from the Carnegie Institution of Washington relating to fundamental RNAi technologies, as well as equipment situated at our Worcester, Massachusetts, laboratory. In connection with the contribution of the licenses and other assets, RXi assumed primary responsibility for all payments to UMMS and other obligations under the contributed licenses and assets.
Reimbursement Agreement
     On January 8, 2007, we entered into a letter agreement with RXi under which RXi has agreed to reimburse us, following its initial funding, for all organizational and operational expenses incurred by us in connection with the formation, initial operations and funding of RXi. As of February 28, 2007, we had advanced approximately $592,000 to RXi for which it will be obligated to reimburse us. We cannot predict the future amounts that we may contribute to RXi under this arrangement.
     Tod Woolf, Ph.D., the President and Chief Executive Officer of RXi, is one of our executive officers. As described above in Item 11, “Executive Compensation – RXi Employment Agreements,” we recently entered into an employment agreement dated aswith Dr. Woolf under which he is entitled to base annual compensation and other employee benefits, including the right to receive, upon completion of July 17, 2003 (and subsequently amended on October 18, 2003), with Louis Ignarro, Ph.D., oneRXi’s initial funding, a grant by RXi of our current directors. Pursuantstock options to purchase a number of shares of RXi common stock equal to 3/70ths of the number of RXi shares held by CytRx immediately prior to the agreement, Dr. Ignarro agreed to serve as our Chief Scientific Spokesperson to the medical and financial communities. As payment for his services, Dr. Ignarro was granted a non-qualified stock option under our 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan to purchase 350,000 registered shares of our common stockinitial funding at an exercise price equal to $1.89, the closing price for our common stock on Nasdaq onfair market value of the dateshares at the time of grant. The option is now fully vested
     Dr. Woolf may be deemed to have a material interest in our transactions with RXi described above, and has a termin our future dealings with RXi, by reason his status as RXi’s President and Chief Executive Officer and in light of seven years. Either party may terminate the agreement at any time.stock options granted to him by RXi upon completion of its initial funding or otherwise.
Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and ServicesPRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
     BDO Seidman, LLP, or BDO, serves as our independent registered public accounting firm and audited our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2005.2006.
Audit Fees
     The aggregate fees for 2006 and 2005 billed to us by BDO for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements, forand in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 and the estimated feescase of 2006, for the audit for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005of management’s assessment of internal controls over financial reporting, are as follows:$815,000 and $170,000, respectively.

71


     
Year: BDO
2005 $170,000 
2004 $217,000 
2003 $160,000 
Audit Related Fees
     For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005,In 2006, BDO rendered $45,000, $0 and $14,000$113,000 of other audit-related services which consisted of certain agreed-upon procedures performed priorrelated to their audita registration statement filed in 2005, SFAS 123/123(R) testing and our restatement of our 2005 financial statementsstatements. BDO rendered no other audit-related services for fiscal 2003 and work performed on the registration statement in 2005.
Tax Fees
     The aggregate fees billed by BDO for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 20042006 were $25,000 and $20,000, respectively.$25,000. We did not engage BDO to perform any tax-related services for the year ended December 31, 2005.

48


All Other Fees
     No other services were rendered by BDO for the years ended December 31, 2003, 20042006 or 2005.
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
     It is the policy of our Audit Committee that all services to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm, including audit services and permitted audit-related and non-audit services, must be pre-approved by our Audit Committee. Our Audit Committee has pre-approved all services, (auditaudit and non-audit)non-audit, provided or to be provided to us by BDO for the years ended December 31, 2003, 20042006 and 2005.
PART IV
Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement SchedulesEXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
     (a) 
(a)The following documents are filed as part of this 10-K:
     (1) Financial Statements
     Our consolidated financial statements and the related report of the independent registered public accounting firm thereon are set forth on pages F-1 to F-22F-25 of this Annual Report. These consolidated financial statements are as follows:
     Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20052006 and 20042005
     Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 2004 and 20032004
     Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 2004 and 20032004
     Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 2004 and 20032004
     Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
     Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms
     (2) Financial Statement Schedules
     The following financial statement schedule is set forth on page F-22F-25 of this Annual Report.
     Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 2004 and 20032004

72


     All other schedules are omitted because they are not required, not applicable, or the information is provided in the financial statements or notes thereto.
(b) Exhibits
     See Exhibit Index on page 5074 of this Annual Report, which is incorporated herein by reference.

4973


CytRx Corporation

Form 10-K Exhibit Index
     
Exhibit    
Number Description Footnote
3.1 Corrected Restated Certificate of Incorporation (a)(l)
     
3.2 Restated By-Laws (b)
     
3.33.4 Certificate Ofof Amendment Toto Restated Certificate of Incorporation (m)
3.4Corrected Restated Certificate of Incorporation(n)(l)
     
3.5 Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation (n)(gg)
     
3.6 Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation (ll)(cc)
     
4.1 Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement dated April 16, 1997 between CytRx Corporation and American Stock Transfer &Trust Company as Rights Agent (c)
     
4.2 Amendment No. 1 to Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement (k)(i)
     
4.3 Stock Restriction and RegistrationAmendment No. 2 to Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement (o)
     
4.4 Warrant issued on July 20, 2002 to Corporate Consulting International Group pursuant to Consulting Engagement Letter dated July 20, 2002 (p)(m)
     
4.5 Warrant issued on February 21, 2003 to Corporate Capital Group International Ltd. Inc (r)(o)
     
4.6 Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant between CytRx Corporation and each of the investors in the May 29, 2003 private placement (s)(p)
     
4.7 Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant between CytRx Corporation and each of the investors in the September 16, 2003 private placement (v)(t)
     
4.8 Warrant issued on May 10, 2004 to MBN Consulting, LLC (aa)(v)
     
4.9 Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant between CytRx Corporation and each of the investors in the October 4, 2004 private placement (dd)(w)
     
4.10 Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant between CytRx Corporation and each of the investors in the January 2005 private placement (ee)(x)
     
4.11 Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant between CytRx Corporation and each of the investors in the March 2006 private placement (kk)(bb)
     
10.1 Agreement with Emory University, as amended (d)
     
10.2Option Agreement granting PSMA Development Company option to enter into a license agreement with CytRx Corporation dated December 23, 2002(q)
10.3*Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between CytRx Corporation and Jack J. Luchese(i)
10.4*Amended and Restated Change of Control Employment Agreement between CytRx Corporation and Jack J. Luchese(i)
10.5*Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement with Jack J. Luchese(k)
10.6*Amendment No. 1 to Change in Control Employment Agreement with Jack J. Luchese(k)
10.7*1986 Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated(f)
10.8*10.2* 1994 Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated (e)
     
10.9*10.3* 1995 Stock Option Plan(f)
10.4*1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan (g)
     
10.10*10.5* 19982000 Long-Term Incentive Plan (h)(i)
     
10.11*10.6* Amendment No. 1 to 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan (k)
     
10.12*10.7* Amendment No. 12 to 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan (m)(k)
10.8*Amendment No. 3 to 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan(t)
10.9*Amendment No. 4 to 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan(t)
10.10†License Agreement dated November 1, 2000 by and between CytRx Corporation and Merck & Co., Inc(h)
10.11†License Agreement dated December 7, 2001 by and between CytRx Corporation and Vical Incorporated(j)
10.12Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of May 29, 2003, between CytRx Corporation and the Purchasers identified on the signature page thereof(p)

5074


     
Exhibit    
Number Description Footnote
10.13*Amendment No. 2 to 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan(m)
     
10.14*Amendment No. 3 to 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan(x)
10.15*Amendment No. 4 to 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan(x)
10.16†License Agreement dated November 1, 2000 by and between CytRx Corporation and Merck & Co., Inc(j)
10.17License Agreement dated February 16, 2001 by and between CytRx Corporation and Ivy Animal Health, Inc(k)
10.18†License Agreement dated December 7, 2001 by and between CytRx Corporation and Vical Incorporated(l)
10.19*Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of May 2002 between CytRx Corporation and Steven A. Kriegsman(p)
10.20Extension of financial advisory agreement between CytRx Corporation and Cappello Capital Corp. dated January 1, 2002 Agreement between Kriegsman Capital Group and CytRx Corporation dated(p)
10.21February 11, 2002 regarding office space rental(p)
10.22Marketing Agreement with Madison & Wall Worldwide, Inc. dated August 14, 2002(p)
10.23Non-exclusive financial advisory agreement between CytRx Corporation and Sands Brothers & Co. Ltd. dated September 12, 2002(p)
10.24Agreement between Kriegsman Capital Group and CytRx Corporate dated January 29, 2003 regarding office space rental and shared services(r)
10.25Consulting Agreement, dated February 21, 2003 between CytRx Corporation and Corporate Capital Group International Ltd. Inc(r)
10.26Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 29, 2003, between CytRx Corporation and the Purchasers identified on the signatory page thereof(s)
10.27Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of May 29, 2003, between CytRx Corporation and the Purchasers identified on the signature page thereof(s)
10.28†10.13† Non-Exclusive License Agreement dated as of April 15, 2003 between University of Massachusetts Medical School and CytRx Corporation covering RNA sequence specific mediators of RNA interference (t)(q)
     
10.29†10.14† Exclusive License Agreement dated as of April 15, 2003 between University of Massachusetts Medical School and CytRx Corporation covering in vivo production of small interfering RNAs (t)(q)
     
10.30†Exclusive License Agreement dated as of April 15, 2003 between University of Massachusetts Medical School and CytRx Corporation covering inhibitation of gene expression in adipocytes using interference RNA(t)
10.31†Exclusive License Agreement dated as of April 15, 2003 between University of Massachusetts Medical School and CytRx Corporation covering RNAi targeting of viruses(t)
10.32†Exclusive License Agreement dated as of April 15, 2003 between University of Massachusetts Medical School and CytRx Corporation covering primary and polyvalent HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein DNA vaccines(t)
10.33†Exclusive License Agreement dated as of April 15, 2003 between University of Massachusetts Medical School and CytRx Corporation covering gene based therapeutics for solid tumor treatments(t)

51


Exhibit
NumberFootnote
10.34†10.15† Exclusive License Agreement dated as of April 15, 2003 between University of Massachusetts Medical School and CytRx Corporation covering selective silencing of a dominant ALS gene by RNAi (t)(q)
     
10.35Investment Banking Agreement dated April 1, 2003 between Rockwell Asset Management Inc. and CytRx Corporation(u)
10.36Investment Banking Agreement dated April 3, 2003 between J.P. Turner & Company, LLC and CytRx Corporation(u)
10.37First Amendment to Investment Banking Agreement dated June 4, 2003 between J.P. Turner & Company, LLC and CytRx Corporation(u)
10.38Exclusive Financial Advisor Engagement Agreement dated May 16, 2003 between Cappello Capital Corp. and CytRx Corporation(u)
10.39Modification letter dated June 6, 2003 to Engagement Agreement between Cappello Capital Corp. and CytRx Corporation(u)
10.40Engagement Letter dated May 27, 2003 between Cardinal Securities, LLC and CytRx Corporation(u)
10.41*Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated June 10, 2003 between Steven A. Kriegsman and CytRx Corporation(u)
10.42Financial Consulting Agreement dated May 10, 2003 between James Skalko and CytRx Corporation(u)
10.43Form of Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 15, 2003, between CytRx Corporation and the Purchasers identified on the signatory page thereof(v)
10.4410.16 Form of Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of September 15, 2003, between CytRx Corporation and the Purchasers identified on the signature page thereof (v)(r)
     
10.45†10.17† Amended and Restated License Agreement dated as of September 15, 2003 between University of Massachusetts Medical School and CytRx Corporation covering inhibition of gene expression in adipocytes using interference RNA, certain data bases, the use of endoplasmic reticulum stress response pathway of adipose cells to enhance whole body insulin sensitivity, and receptor-activated reporter systems (w)(s)
     
10.46Second Amendment to Investment Banking Agreement dated as of August 13, 2003 between J.P. Turner & Company, LLC and CytRx Corporation(w)
10.47*Agreement dated as of July 17, 2003 between Dr. Louis J. Ignarro and CytRx Corporation(w)
10.48*Employment Agreement dated as of August 1, 2003 between C. Kirk Peacock and CytRx Corporation(w)
10.49*Employment Agreement dated as of September 17, 2003 between Mark A. Tepper and Araios, Inc(w)
10.50Agreement of Settlement and Release dated August 8, 2003 among Corporate Capital Group International Ltd., Inc, Peter Simone and CytRx Corporation(w)
10.51Confirming letter dated September 19, 2003 to the engagement agreement dated May 16, 2003 between Cappello Capital Corp. and CytRx Corporation(w)
10.52Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of September 16, 2003 between Araios, Inc. and CytRx Corporation(w)
10.53Stockholders Agreement dated as of September 17, 2003 among Araios, Inc., Dr. Michael Czech and CytRx Corporation(w)
10.54Private Placement Agent Agreement dated September 15, 2003 between Dunwoody Brokerage Services, Inc. and CytRx Corporation(w)

52


Exhibit
NumberFootnote
10.55Private Placement Agent Agreement dated September 15, 2003 between Gilford Securities Incorporated and CytRx Corporation(w)
10.56Agreement dated as of September 16, 2003 between Maxim Group, LLC and CytRx Corporation(w)
10.57Amended and Restated Professional Services Agreement among CytRx Corporation, The Kriegsman Group and Kriegsman Capital Group, dated as of July 1, 2003(x)
10.58†10.18† Agreement among University of Massachusetts, Advanced BioScience Laboratories, Inc and CytRx Corporation, dated as of December 3, 2003 (x)(t)
     
10.59†10.19† Amended and Restated Exclusive License Agreement among University of Massachusetts Medical School, CytRx Corporation and Advanced BioScience Laboratories, Inc., dated as of December 22, 2003 (x)(t)
     
10.60†10.20† Collaboration Agreement among University of Massachusetts, Advanced BioScience Laboratories, Inc. and CytRx Corporation, dated as of December 22, 2003 (x)(t)
     
10.61†10.21† Sublicense Agreement between CytRx Corporation and Advanced BioScience Laboratories, Inc., dated as of December 22, 2003 (x)(t)
     
10.62†10.22† Agreement between CytRx Corporation and Dr. Robert Hunter regarding SynthRx, Inc dated October 20, 2003 (x)(t)
     
10.6310.23 Office Lease between The Kriegsman Group and Douglas Emmett, dated April 13, 2000 (x)(t)
     
10.6410.24 Assignment to CytRx Corporation effective July 1, 2003 of Office Lease between The Kriegsman Group and Douglas Emmett, dated April 13, 2000 (x)(t)
     
10.65*Amendment dated October 18, 2003 to Agreement between Dr. Louis J. Ignarro and CytRx Corporation dated as of July 17, 2003(x)
10.66Consulting Agreement dated December 1, 2003 between CytRx Corporation and MBN Consulting, LLC(x)
10.6710.25 Office Lease between Araios, Inc. and Are-One Innovation Drive, LLC dated 11-19-03 (x)(t)
     
10.68Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 29, 2004, by and between CytRx Corporation and Advanced BioScience Laboratories, Inc(y)
10.69Consulting Agreement, dated as of February 9, 2004, between CytRx Corporation and The Investor Relations Group, Inc(y)
10.70Investment Banking Agreement, dated as of February , 2004, between CytRx Corporation and Gunn Allen Financial, Inc(y)
10.71Scientific Advisory Board Agreement, effective as of March 3, 2004, by Tariq M. Rana, Ph.D., CytRx Corporation and Araios, Inc(y)
10.72Scientific Advisory Board Agreement, effective as of March 3, 2004, by Craig Mello, Ph.D., CytRx Corporation and Araios, Inc(y)
10.73†10.26† Patent License Agreement, dated May, 2004, among CytRx Corporation, Imperial College of Science and Technology and Imperial College Innovations Limited (z)(u)
     
10.74*Mutual General Release and Severance Agreement, dated May 12, 2004, between CytRx Corporation and C. Kirk Peacock(z)
10.75*Mutual General Release and Severance Agreement, dated May12, 2004, between CytRx Corporation and Gregory Liberman(z)
10.76Settlement and Release Agreement dated May 10, 2004, by and between MBN Consulting, LLC and CytRx Corporation(aa)
10.77Registration Rights Agreement dated May 10, 2004, by and between MBN Consulting, LLC and CytRx Corporation(aa)

53


Exhibit
NumberFootnote
10.78†Collaboration and Invention Disclosure Agreement dated July 8, 2004, by and between the University of Massachusetts, as represented solely by the Medical School at its Worcester campus, and CytRx Corporation(aa)
10.79*Employment Agreement dated July 6, 2004, by and between Jack Barber and CytRx Corporation(aa)
10.80*Employment Agreement dated July 12, 2004, by and between Matthew Natalizio and CytRx Corporation(aa)
10.81*Employment Agreement dated July 15, 2004, by and between Benjamin Levin and CytRx Corporation(aa)
10.82Mutual and General Release of All Claims effective as of May 29, 2004, by and between Madison & Wall Worldwide, Inc. and CytRx Corporation(aa)
10.83Registration Rights Agreement dated May , 2004, by and between Madison & Wall Worldwide, Inc. and CytRx Corporation(aa)
10.84Investment Banking Agreement dated September 13, 2004, by and between CytRx Corporation and J.P. Turner & Company, LLC(bb)
10.85Investment Banking Agreement dated September 30, 2004, by and between CytRx Corporation and Rodman & Renshaw, LLC(cc)
10.8610.27 Asset Sale and Purchase Agreement dated October 4, 2004, by and among CytRx Corporation, Biorex Research & Development, RT and BRX Research and Development Company Ltd (dd)(w)
     
10.87Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of October 4, 2004 among CytRx Corporation and the Purchasers identified on the signatory page thereof(dd)
10.8810.28 Registration Rights Agreement dated as of October 4, 2004 among CytRx Corporation and the Purchasers identified on the signatory page thereof (dd)(w)
     
10.8910.29 Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 20, 2005, by and among CytRx Corporation and the Investors named therein (ee)(x)
     
10.9010.30 Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 20, 2005, by and among CytRx Corporation and the Investors named therein (ee)(x)
     
10.91Investment Banking Agreement dated January 20, 2005 between CytRx Corporation and Rodman & Renshaw, LLC(ee)
10.91*Employment Agreement dated April 29, 2005 between CytRx Corporation and Dr. Scott Wieland(ff)
10.92*Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated May 17, 2005 between CytRx Corporation and Steven A. Kriegsman(gg)
10.93*Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated May 17, 2005 between CytRx Corporation and Matthew Natalizio(gg)
10.94*Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated May 17, 2005 between CytRx Corporation and Dr. Jack Barber(gg)
10.95*Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated May 17, 2005 between CytRx Corporation and Benjamin S. Levin(gg)
10.96*10.31* Employment Agreement dated October 6, 2005 between CytRx Corporation and Dr. Mark A. Tepper (hh)
10.97First Amendment to Office Lease dated October 14, 2005, by and between CytRx Corporation and Douglas Emmett 1993, LLC(ii)
10.98*Schedule of Non-Employee Director Compensation adopted on October 24, 2005(jj)
10.99Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2006, by and among CytRx Corporation and the purchasers named therein(kk)(y)

5475


     
Exhibit    
Number Description Footnote
10.100
10.32*Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated May 17, 2005 between CytRx Corporation and Steven A. Kriegsman(z)
10.33First Amendment to Office Lease dated October 14, 2005, by and between CytRx Corporation and Douglas Emmett 1993, LLC(aa)
10.34 Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2006, by and among CytRx Corporation and the purchasers named therein. (kk)(bb)
     
10.10110.35 Lock-UpFirst Amendment to Lease Agreement dated as of March 2,24, 2006, by and amongbetween CytRx Corporation Steven A. Kriegsman and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company.ARE-One Innovation Drive, LLC (kk)(dd)
     
10.10210.36* Investment BankingSecond Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated February___,June 16, 2006 between CytRx Corporation and T.R. Winston & Company LLC.Dr. Jack Barber (kk)(ee)
     
14.110.37* Code of Ethics.Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated June 16, 2006 between CytRx Corporation and Matthew Natalizio (x)(ee)
10.38*Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated June 16, 2006 between CytRx Corporation and Benjamin S. Levin(ee)
10.39*Schedule of Non-Employee Director Compensation adopted on June 20, 2006(ee)
10.40Royalty Agreement dated August 28, 2006 between CytRx Corporation and Kenneth Council, as Trustee of the ALS Charitable Remainder Trust(ff)
     
21.1 Subsidiaries.Subsidiaries  
     
23.1 Consent of BDO Seidman, LLP.LLP  
     
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  
     
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  
     
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  
     
32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  
 
* Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
 
 Confidential treatment has been requested or granted for certain portions which have been blanked out in the copy of the exhibit filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omitted information has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
(a) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-39607) filed on November 5, 1997
 
(b) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-37171) filed on July 21, 1997
 
(c) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 21,17, 1997
 
(d) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-l (File No. 33-8390) filed on November 5, 1986
 
(e) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 13, 1997

76


(f)Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 27, 1996
(g) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 33-93818) filed on June 22, 1995
 
(h)(g) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 30, 1998
 
(i)Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 30, 2000
(j)(h) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on March 16, 2001
 
(k)(i) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 27, 2001

55


(l)(j) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 21, 2001
 
(m)(k) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement filed June 10, 2002
 
(n)(l) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form S-8 (File No. 333-91068) filed on June 24, 2002
 
(o)Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s 8-K filed on August 1, 2002
(p)(m) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s 10-Q filed on November 14, 2002
 
(q)(n) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s 10-K filed on March 31, 2003
 
(r)(o) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s 10-Q filed on May 15, 2003
 
(s)(p) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s 8-K filed on May 30, 2003
 
(t)(q) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s S-3 Amendment No. 4 (File No. 333-100947) filed on August 5, 2003
 
(u)Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s 10-Q filed on August 14, 2003
(v)(r) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s 8-K filed on September 17, 2003
 
(w)(s) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s 10-Q filed on November 12, 2003
 
(x)(t) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s 10-K filed on May 14, 2004
 
(y)Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s 10-Q filed on May 17, 2004
(z)(u) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 to Form S-3 (Reg. No. 333-109708) filed on June 2, 2004
 
(aa)(v) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s 10-Q filed on August 16, 2004
 
(bb)Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s 8-K filed on September 17, 2004
(cc)Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s 10-Q filed on November 3, 2004
(dd)(w) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s 8-K filed on October 5, 2004
 
(ee)(x) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s 8-K filed on January 21, 2005
 
(ff)(y) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s 8-K filed on May 4,October 7, 2005
 
(gg)(z) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s 10-Q filed on August 15, 2005
 
(hh)Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s 8-K filed on October 7, 2005
(ii)(aa) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s 8-K filed on October 20, 2005
 
(jj)Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s 10-Q filed on November 14, 2005
(kk)(bb) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s 8-K filed on March 3, 2006
 
(ll)(cc) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement filed June 7, 2005
(dd)Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2006
(ee)Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s 10-Q filed on August 3, 2006

5677


(ff)Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s 10-Q filed on November 13, 2006
(gg)Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement filed September 17, 2003

78


SIGNATURES
     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
CYTRX CORPORATION
By:/s/Steven A. Kriegsman
Steven A. Kriegsman
President and Chief Executive Officer
     
Date: March 30, 200631, 2007 CYTRX CORPORATION
By:  /s/ STEVEN A. KRIEGSMAN  
  Steven A. Kriegsman  
President and Chief Executive Officer 

79


     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
     
SignatureTitleDate
/s/Steven A. Kriegsman
Steven A. Kriegsman
President and Chief Executive
Officer and Director 
March 30, 2006
/s/Matthew Natalizio
Matthew Natalizio
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(principal financial and
accounting officer)
March 30, 2006
/s/Louis J. Ignarro, Ph.D
DirectorMarch 30, 2006
Louis J. Ignarro, Ph.DCytRx Corporation
  
/s/Max Link
DirectorMarch 30, 2006
Max Link
/s/Joseph Rubinfeld, Ph.D
DirectorMarch 30, 2006
Joseph Rubinfeld, Ph.D
/s/Marvin R. Selter
DirectorMarch 30, 2006
Marvin R. Selter
/s/Richard L. Wennekamp
DirectorMarch 30, 2006
Richard L. Wennekamp

57


INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

F-1


CYTRX CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
        
         December 31, 
 December 31,  2006 2005 
 2005 2004  (restated) 
ASSETS
  
Current assets:  
Cash and cash equivalents $8,299,390 $1,987,595  $30,381,393 $8,299,390 
Short-term investments  1,011,814 
Accounts Receiveable 172,860  
Prepaid compensation, current portion 27,813 604,750 
Prepaid and other current assets 287,793 351,396 
Accounts Receivable 105,930 172,860 
Prepaid insurance, current portion 189,193 192,797 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 44,130 122,809 
          
Total current assets 8,787,856 3,955,555  30,720,646 8,787,856 
          
Equipment and furnishings, net 352,641 447,579  252,719 352,641 
          
Molecular library, net 372,973 447,567  283,460 372,973 
          
Goodwill 183,780   183,780 183,780 
          
Other assets:  
Prepaid and other assets 241,660 198,055 
Deposits and prepaid insurance expense 195,835 241,660 
          
Total assets $9,938,910 $5,048,756  $31,636,440 $9,938,910 
          
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
  
 
Current liabilities:  
Accounts payable $815,626 $1,661,104  $955,156 $815,626 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities 1,639,922 1,074,146  2,722,478 1,639,922 
Deferred revenue, current portion 6,733,350  
          
Total current liabilities 2,455,548 2,735,250  10,410,984 2,455,548 
Accrued loss on facility abandonment  206,833 
Deferred gain on sale of building  65,910 
Deferred revenue 275,000 275,000 
Deferred revenue, non-current portion 16,075,117 275,000 
          
Total liabilities 2,730,548 3,282,993  26,486,101 2,730,548 
          
Minority interest  170,671 
     
Commitments and contingencies   
Commitment and contingencies 
Stockholders’ equity:  
Preferred Stock, $.01 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, including 5,000 shares of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock; no shares issued and outstanding      
Common stock, $.001 par value, 125,000,000 shares authorized; 59,283,960 and 40,189,688 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively 59,284 40,190 
Common stock, $.001 par value, 125,000,000 shares authorized; 70,788,586 and 59,283,960 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively 70,789 59,284 
Additional paid-in capital 130,715,363 110,028,327  146,961,657 131,790,932 
Treasury stock, at cost (633,816 shares held, at cost, at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively)  (2,279,238)  (2,279,238)
Treasury stock, at cost (633,816 shares held, at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively)  (2,279,238)  (2,279,238)
Accumulated deficit  (121,287,047)  (106,194,187)  (139,602,869)  (122,362,616)
          
Total stockholders’ equity 7,208,362 1,595,092  5,150,339 7,208,362 
          
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $9,938,910 $5,048,756  $31,636,440 $9,938,910 
          
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated balance sheets.financial statements.

F-2


CYTRX CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
            
             Years Ended December 31, 
 Year Ended December 31,  2006 2005 2004 
 2005 2004 2003  (restated) 
Income:  
Service revenues $82,860 $ $ 
License fees 101,500 428,164 94,000  $101,000 $101,500 $428,164 
       
Grant revenue 105,930   
Service revenue 1,858,772 82,860  
 184,360 428,164 94,000        
        2,065,702 184,360 428,164 
        
Expenses:  
Research and development (includes non-cash stock compensation of $219,718, $1,387,645 and $2,902,484 in 2005, 2004, and 2003 respectively) 9,087,270 6,012,903 4,387,599 
Research and development (includes non-cash stock compensation to consultants of $674,030, $219,718 and $1,387,645 in 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively; employee stock option expense of $248,908 in 2006) 9,781,007 9,087,270 6,012,903 
In-process research and development  3,021,952     3,021,952 
Common stock, stock options and warrants issued for general and administrative 366,753 1,977,330 3,148,047 
General and administrative 6,057,353 5,923,910 3,840,620 
General and administrative (includes non-cash stock compensation to consultants of $59,578, $366,753 and $1,977,330 in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively; employee stock option expense of $975,546 in 2006) 9,657,257 6,424,106 7,901,240 
Depreciation and amortization 217,095 103,851 2,130  227,704 217,095 103,851 
              
 15,728,471 17,039,946 11,378,396  19,665,968 15,728,471 17,039,946 
              
Loss before other income  (15,544,111)  (16,611,782)  (11,284,396)  (17,600,266)  (15,544,111)  (16,611,782)
Other income — 
Other income: 
Interest income 996,647 206,195 59,977 
Gain on lease termination 163,604     163,604  
Interest income 206,195 59,977 82,064 
Other expense  (3,205)   
         (16,606,824)  (15,174,312)  (16,551,805)
  (15,174,312)  (16,551,805)  (11,202,332)
Equity in losses from minority-owned entity    (6,662,031)
Minority interest in losses of subsidiary 81,452 159,616 19,763   81,452 159,616 
              
Net loss before provision for income taxes  (16,606,824)  (15,092,860)  (16,392,189)
Provision for income taxes  (145,000)   
       
Net loss $(15,092,860) $(16,392,189) $(17,844,600)  (16,751,824)  (15,092,860)  (16,392,189)
Deemed dividend for anti-dilution adjustments made to outstanding common stock warrants  (488,429)  (1,075,568)  
              
Basic and diluted loss per common share $(0.27) $(0.48) $(0.65)
Net loss applicable to common stockholders $(17,240,253) $(16,168,428) $(16,392,189)
       
Basic and diluted loss per share, as originally stated $(0.25) $(0.27) $(0.48)
       
Basic and diluted loss per share, as restated $(0.25) $(0.28) $(0.48)
              
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding 56,852,402 34,325,636 27,324,794  68,105,626 56,852,402 34,325,636 
              
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3


CYTRX CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
                                                
 Additional        Additional       
 Common Stock Paid-In Accumulated Treasury    Common Stock Paid-In Accumulated Treasury   
 Shares Issued Amount Capital Deficit Stock Total  Shares Issued Amount Capital Deficit Stock Total 
Balance at December 31, 2002 22,143,927 $22,144 $82,173,839 $(71,957,398) $(2,279,238) $7,959,347 
Issuance of common stock for research and development 1,828,359 1,828 2,550,606   2,552,434 
Common stock and warrants issued in connection with private placements 7,081,025 7,081 12,485,543   12,492,624 
Issuance of common stock for services 700,000 700 1,534,050   1,534,750 
Issuance of stock options/warrants   1,613,297   1,613,297 
Options and warrants exercised 2,638,689 2,639 1,882,125   1,884,764 
Net loss     (17,844,600)   (17,844,600)
             
Balance at December 31, 2003 34,392,000 34,392 102,239,460  (89,801,998)  (2,279,238) 10,192,616  34,392,000 $34,392 $102,239,460 $(89,801,998) $(2,279,238) $10,192,616 
Common stock and warrants issued in connection with private placements 4,100,000 4,100 3,899,900   3,904,000  4,100,000 4,100 3,899,900   3,904,000 
Issuance of common stock for services 800,000 800 1,252,950   1,253,750  800,000 800 1,252,950   1,253,750 
Issuance of stock options/warrants   2,111,225   2,111,225 
Issuance of stock options/warrants for services and licenses   2,111,225   2,111,225 
Options and warrants exercised 897,688 898 524,792   525,690  897,688 898 524,792   525,690 
Net loss     (16,392,189)   (16,392,189)     (16,392,189)   (16,392,189)
                          
Balance at December 31, 2004 40,189,688 40,190 110,028,327  (106,194,187)  (2,279,238) 1,595,092  40,189,688 40,190 110,028,327  (106,194,187)  (2,279,238) 1,595,092 
Common stock and warrants issued in connection with private placements 18,084,494 18,084 19,572,362   19,590,446  18,084,494 18,084 19,572,362   19,590,446 
Issuance of stock options/ warrants: 
For services   586,471   586,471 
Issuance of stock options/warrants For services and licenses   586,471   586,471 
For minority interest   273,000   273,000    273,000   273,000 
Options and warrants exercised 1,009,778 1,010 255,203   256,213  1,009,778 1,010 255,203   256,213 
Deemed dividend   1,075,569  (1,075,569)   
Net loss     (15,092,860)   (15,092,860)     (15,092,860)   (15,092,860)
                          
Balance at December 31, 2005 59,283,960 $59,284 $130,715,363 $(121,287,047) $(2,279,238) $7,208,362  59,283,960 59,284 131,790,932  (122,362,616)  (2,279,238) 7,208,362 
Common stock and warrants issued in connection with private placements 10,650,795 10,651 12,393,709   12,404,360 
Issuance of stock options/warrants for services and licenses 149,928 150 1,930,098   1,930,248 
Options and warrants exercised 703,903 704 358,489   359,193 
Deemed dividend   488,429  (488,429)   
Net loss     (16,751,824)   (16,751,824)
                          
Balance at December 31, 2006 70,788,586 $70,789 $146,961,657 $(139,602,869) $(2,279,238) $5,150,339 
             
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4


CYTRX CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                        
 Years Ended December 31,  Years Ended December 31, 
 2005 2004 2003  2006 2005 2004 
Cash flows from operating activities:  
Net loss $(15,092,860) $(16,392,189) $(17,844,600) $(16,751,824) $(15,092,860) $(16,392,189)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: 
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: 
Depreciation and amortization 217,095 103,851 2,130  227,704 217,095 103,851 
Equity in losses from minority-owned entity   6,662,031 
Loss on retirement of equipment 2,864   
Minority interest in losses of subsidiary  (81,452)  (159,616)  (19,763)   (81,452)  (159,616)
Gain on lease termination  (163,604)         (163,604)  
Stock option and warrant expense 366,753 1,104,730 1,613,297  1,284,032 366,753 1,104,730 
Common stock issued for services  872,600 1,534,750  262,500  872,600 
Non-cash research and development 219,718 1,387,645 2,902,484 
Non-cash stock compensation related to research and development 411,530 219,718 1,387,645 
Changes in assets and liabilities:  
Accounts receivable  (172,860)    66,930  (172,860)  
Note receivable  16,608 365,249    16,608 
Prepaid and other assets 596,935  (768,433) 14,123 
Prepaid expenses and other assets 100,295 596,935  (768,433)
Accounts payable  (845,477) 922,969 658,188  139,530  (845,477) 922,969 
Other liabilities 456,637 558,643  (181,044)
Deferred revenue 22,533,467   
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities 1,082,557 456,637 558,643 
              
Total adjustments 593,745 4,038,997 13,551,445  26,111,409 593,745 4,038,997 
              
Net cash used in operating activities  (14,499,115)  (12,353,192)  (4,293,155)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 9,359,585  (14,499,115)  (12,353,192)
              
Cash flows from investing activities:  
Purchases of short-term investments   (961,765)      (961,765)
Redemption of short-term investments 1,011,814  1,401,358   1,011,814  
Net cash paid related to acquisition Purchases of property and equipment  (47,563)  (771,584)  (228,459)
Disposals of property and equipment, net    
Net cash paid related to acquisition/purchases of property and equipment  (41,133)  (47,563)  (771,584)
              
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities 964,251  (1,733,349) 1,172,899   (41,133) 964,251  (1,733,349)
              
Cash flows from financing activities:  
Net proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants 256,213 525,690 1,884,764  359,191 256,213 525,690 
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock 19,590,446 3,904,000 12,492,624  12,404,360 19,590,446 3,904,000 
              
Net cash provided by financing activities 19,846,659 4,429,690 14,377,388  12,763,551 19,846,659 4,429,690 
              
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 6,311,795  (9,656,851) 11,257,132  22,082,003 6,311,795  (9,656,851)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 1,987,595 11,644,446 387,314  8,299,390 1,987,595 11,644,446 
              
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $8,299,390 $1,987,595 $11,644,446  $30,381,393 $8,299,390 $1,987,595 
              
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: 
Cash received during the year for interest received $996,647 $206,195 $59,977 
        
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing activities: 
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing activities: 
Fair market value of options and warrants provided for goods and services $586,471 $1,104,730 $1,613,297  $705,794 $586,471 $1,104,730 
              
Fair market value of common stock exchanged for minority interest in subsidiary $273,000 $ $  $ $273,000 $ 
              
Non-cash financing activities:
In connection with the Company’s adjustments to terms of certain outstanding warrants on January 20, 2005 and March 2, 2006, the Company recorded deemed dividends of $1,075,568 and $488,429, respectively, which were recorded as charges to retained earnings with corresponding credits to additional paid-in capital.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5


CYTRX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Nature of Business
     CytRx Corporation (“CytRx” or the “Company”) is a biopharmaceutical research and development company, based in Los Angeles, California, with an obesity and type 2 diabetes research laboratory in Worcester, Massachusetts (see Note 11). On September 30, 2005, the Company completed the merger of CytRx Laboratories, Inc., previously a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and the owner of its Massachusetts laboratory (the “Subsidiary”(“CytRx Laboratories”), with and into the Company. The Company’s small molecule therapeutics efforts include the clinical development of three, oral drug candidates that it acquired in OctoberIn 2004, as well as a drug discovery operation conducted by its laboratory in Worcester, Massachusetts. The Company owns the rights to a portfolio of technologies, including ribonueleic acid interference (RNAi or gene silencing) technology in the treatment of specified diseases, including those within the areas of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS or Lou Gehrig’s disease), obesity and type 2 diabetes and human cytomegalovirus (CMV). In addition, the Company recently announced thatbegan a novel HIV DNA + protein boost vaccine exclusively licensed to the Company and developed by researchers at University of Massachusetts Medical School and Advanced BioScience Laboratories, and funded by the National Institutes of Health, demonstrated promising interim Phase I clinical trial results that indicate its potential to produce potent antibody responses with neutralizing activity against multiple HIV viral strains. The Company has entered into strategic alliances with third parties to develop several of the Company’s other products.
     On October 4, 2004, CytRx acquired all of the clinical and pharmaceutical and related intellectual property assets of Biorex Research & Development, RT, or Biorex, a Hungary-based company focused on the development of novel small moleculesprogram based on molecular “chaperone” co-induction technology through the acquisition of novel small molecules with broad therapeutic applications in neurology, type 2 diabetes, cardiology and cardiology.diabetic complications. The acquired assets includeincluded three oral, clinical stage drug candidates and a library of 500 small molecule drug candidates. TheIn September 2006, the Company recently entered theannounced results of its Phase IIa clinical stagetesting of drug development with the initiation of a Phase II clinical program with its lead small molecule product candidate arimoclomol for the treatment of ALS.amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), reporting that arimoclomol had met the trial’s primary endpoints of safety and tolerability at all three doses tested, and that the trial results indicated a non-statistically-significant trend of improvement in functional capacity as measured by the Revised ALS Functional Ration Scale in the arimoclomol high dose group as compared with untreated patients. Arimoclomol has received Orphan Drug and Fast Track designation from the US Food and Drug Administration and orphan medicinal product status from the European Commission for the treatment of ALS. The Company plans to initiate a Phase IIb trial of arimoclomol for this indication during the second half of 2007, subject to approval of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The Company is also pursuing clinical development of its other small molecule product candidates, as well as a novel HIV DNA + protein vaccine, and has entered into strategic alliances with respect to the development of products using its other technologies.
     CytRx is also engaged in developing therapeutic products based upon ribonucleic acid interference, or RNAi, which has the potential to effectively treat a broad array of diseases by interfering with the expression of targeted disease-associated genes. In order to fully realize the potential value of its RNAi technologies, in January 2007, the Company transferred to RXi Pharmaceuticals Corporation, its majority-owned subsidiary, substantially all of its RNAi-related technologies and assets. RXi will focus solely on developing and commercializing therapeutic products based upon RNAi technologies for the treatment of human diseases, including neurodegenerative diseases, cancer, type 2 diabetes and obesity.
     To date, the Company has relied primarily upon selling equity securities and upon proceeds received upon the exercise of options and warrants and, to a much lesser extent, upon payments from its strategic partners and licensees, and upon proceeds received upon the exercise of options and warrants to generate the funds needed to finance itsour business and operations. Management believesAt December 31, 2006, the Company’sCompany had cash and cash equivalents balances are sufficientof $30.4 million. Management believes that the Company has adequate financial resources to meet projected cash requirementssupport its currently planned level of operations into the thirdfirst quarter of 2007.2009, which expectation is based in part on projected expenditures for 2007 of: $6.5 million for the Company’s Phase IIb trial for arimoclomol for ALS and related studies, $4.4 million for the Company’s other ongoing and planned preclinical programs, $8.8 million for general and administrative expenses, and $1.6 million to provide interim funding for RXi’s first few months of operations. Management estimates that RXi will expend approximately $6.2 million on development activities for 2007 (including approximately $400,000 in payments under agreements with UMMS, $3.2 million in other research and development expenses and $2.6 million in general and administrative expenses). If, in addition to the interim funding for which the Company has already budgeted, the Company elects to provide RXi with all or a substantial portion of its initial funding for 2007 and beyond in the coming few months, and if the Company is unable to raise funds in the future to replenish any amounts that it provides to RXi, its current working capital will be depleted accordingly. The Company will be required to obtain significant additional funding in order to execute its long-term business plans, although it does not currently have commitments from any third parties to provide it with capital. The Company cannot assure that additional funding will be available on favorable terms, or at all. If the Company fails to obtain significant additional funding when needed, it may not be able to execute its business plans and its business

F-6


may suffer, which would have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
     Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation— The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CytRx together with those of its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries. The accounts of the Subsidiary,CytRx Laboratories, less the minority interest, are included from September 17, 2003 until June 30, 2005, when the Company purchased the outstanding 5% interest in the SubsidiaryCytRx Laboratories (see Note 11) and the SubsidiaryCytRx Laboratories became wholly owned by the Company. The accounts of Global Genomics are included since July 19, 2002 (see Note 12). RXi had no operations during 2006 (see Note 19).
     Revenue Recognition— Biopharmaceutical revenues consist of license fees and milestone payments from strategic alliances from pharmaceutical companies as well as contract research.service revenues. Service revenues consist of government grants,contract research and laboratory consulting.

F-6


CYTRX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) Grant revenues consist of government and private grants.
     Monies received for license fees are deferred and recognized ratably over the performance period in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 101,104, Revenue Recognition. Milestone payments will be recognized upon achievement of the milestone as long as the milestone is deemed substantive and the Company has no other performance obligations related to the milestone and collectibility is reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt, or recognized upon termination of the agreement and all related obligations. Unbilled costs and fees represent revenue recognized prior to billing. Deferred revenue represents amounts received prior to revenue recognition.
     Revenues from contract research, government grants, and consulting fees are recognized over the respective contract periods as the services are performed, provided there is persuasive evidence or an arrangement, the fee is fixed or determinable and collection of the related receivable is reasonably assured.
     In August 2006, the Company received approximately $24.5 million in marketable securities (which were sold by the Company for approximately $24.3 million in cash) from the privately-funded ALS Charitable Remainder Trust (ALSCRT) in exchange for the commitment to continue research and development of arimoclomol and other potential treatments for ALS and a one percent royalty in the worldwide sales of arimoclomol. Under the arrangement, the Company retains the rights to any products or intellectual property funded by the arrangement and the proceeds of the transaction are non-refundable. Further, the ALS Charitable Remainder Trust has no obligation to provide any further funding to the Company. Management has analyzed the transaction and concluded that due to the research and development components of the transaction that it is properly accounted for under SFAS No. 68,Research and Development Arrangements. Accordingly, the Company has recorded the value received under the arrangement as deferred service revenue and will recognize service revenue using the proportional performance method of revenue recognition, meaning that service revenue is recognized on a dollar for dollar basis for each dollar of expense incurred for the research and development of arimoclomol and then the development of other potential ALS treatments. The percentage of services performedCompany believes that this method best approximates the efforts expended related to contract research, government grants and consultingthe services is based upon the ratioprovided. The Company adjusts its estimates quarterly. As of the number of direct labor hours performed to date to the total hoursDecember 31, 2006, the Company is obligatedrecognized approximately $1.8 million of service revenue related to perform under the related contract.this transaction.
     Cash Equivalents— The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments with an original maturity of 90 days or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents consist primarily of amounts invested in money market accounts.
     Investments— Management determines the appropriate classification of debt securities at the time of purchase. Debt securities are classified as held-to-maturity when the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity. Held-to-maturity securities are stated at amortized cost. Marketable equity securities and debt securities not classified as held-to-maturity are classified as available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value, with the unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Realized gains and losses are included in investment income and are determined on a first-in, first-out basis.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments— The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents short-term investments, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate their fair values.
     Property and Equipment— Property and equipment are stated at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives (generally three to five years for equipment and furniture) of the related assets. Whenever there is a triggering event that might suggest an impairment, management evaluates the realizability of recorded long-lived assets to determine whether their carrying values have been

F-7


impaired. The Company records impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations when events and circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired and the nondiscountednon-discounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the carrying amount of those assets. Any impairment loss is measured by comparing the fair value of the asset to its carrying amount.
     Molecular Library—The Molecular Library, a collection of chemical compounds that we believethe Company believes may be developed into drug candidates, are stated at cost and depreciated over five years; the estimated useful life of the molecular library, which is less than the remaining life of the related patents. The molecular library is presently used as a tool in the Company’s drug discovery program. On an annual basis, or whenever there is a triggering event that might suggest an impairment, management evaluates the realizability of the molecular library to determine whether its carrying value has been impaired. The Company records impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations when events and circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired and the nondiscountednon-discounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the carrying amount of those assets. Any impairment loss is measured by comparing the fair value of the asset to its carrying amount.

F-7


CYTRX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Impairment of Long-Lived Assets(Continued)The Company reviews long-lived assets, including finite lived intangible assets, for impairment on an annual basis, as of December 31, or on an interim basis if an event occurs that might reduce the fair value of such assets below their carrying values. An impairment loss would be recognized based on the difference between the carrying value of the asset and its estimated fair value, which would be determined based on either discounted future cash flows or other appropriate fair value methods.
     Patents and Patent Application Costs— Although the Company believes that its patents and underlying technology have continuing value, the amount of future benefits to be derived from the patents is uncertain. Patent costs are therefore expensed as incurred.
     Basic and Diluted Loss per Common Share— Basic and diluted loss per common share are computed based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Common share equivalents (which consist of options and warrants) are excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share since the effect would be antidilutive. Common share equivalents which could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future, and which were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share, totaled approximately 30.2 million shares, 24.7 million shares 14.5 million shares and 10.114.5 million shares at December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
     In connection with the Company’s adjustment to the exercise terms of certain outstanding warrants to purchase common stock on March 2, 2006 and 2003,January 20, 2005, the Company recorded deemed dividends of $488,000 and $1.1 million, respectively. These deemed dividends are reflected as an adjustment to net loss for the first quarter of 2006 and the year ended 2005, as restated, to arrive at net loss applicable to common stockholders on the Consolidated Statement of Operations and for purposes of calculating basic and diluted earnings per shares.
     Shares Reserved for Future Issuance— As of December 31, 2005,2006, the Company has reserved approximately 3.962.9 million of its authorized but unissued shares of common stock for future issuance pursuant to its employee stock option plans and warrants issued to consultants and investors.
     Stock-basedShare-based CompensationThePrior to January 1, 2006, the Company accountsaccounted for stock-basedits stock based compensation usingplans under the intrinsic value method in accordance with APBrecognition and measurement provisions of Accounting Principles Board No. 25, (Note 14),Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees(“ (“APB 25”)., and related interpretations for all awards granted to employees. Under APB 25, when stock options are issued with anthe exercise price equalof options granted to employees under these plans equals the market price of the underlyingcommon stock price on the date of grant, no compensation expense is recognized. The Company continuesrecorded. When the exercise price of options granted to followemployees under these plans is less than the disclosure-only provisionsmarket price of SFAS No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation(“SFAS 123”), as amended by SFAS No. 148, which requires the disclosure of proforma net income and earnings per share as if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123. The following table illustrates the effectcommon stock on net loss and loss per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 to stock-based employee compensation (amounts in thousands except per share data):
             
  2005  2004  2003 
Net loss, as reported $(15,092) $(16,392) $(17,845)
Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value-based method for all awards  (619)  (1,376)  (928)
          
Pro forma net loss $(15,711) $(17,768) $(18,773)
          
Loss per share, as reported (basic and diluted) $(0.27) $(0.48) $(0.65)
Loss per share, pro forma (basic and diluted) $(0.27) $(0.52) $(0.69)
     The fair value for the Company’s options and warrants was estimated at the date of grant, using a Black-Scholes option pricing model withcompensation expense is recognized over the following assumptions:
             
  2005 2004 2003
Weighted average risk free interest rate  4.25%  4.25%  2.82%
Dividend yields  0%  0%  0%
Volatility factors of the expected market price of the Company’s common stock  109%  109%  99%
Weighted average years outstanding  4.8   5.8   5.1 
vesting period.
     The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developedCompany’s share-based employee compensation plans are described in Note 13. On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS 123(R), “Accounting for use in estimatingStock-based Compensation (Revised 2004)” (“123(R)”), which requires the fair valuemeasurement and recognition of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Company’s employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion, the existingcompensation expense for all share-based payment awards

F-8


CYTRX CORPORATIONmade to employees, non-employee directors, and consultants, including employee stock options. SFAS 123(R) supersedes the Company’s previous accounting under APB 25 and SFAS 123, for periods beginning in fiscal 2006. In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued SAB 107 relating to SFAS 123(R). The Company has applied the provisions of SAB 107 in its adoption of SFAS 123(R).
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
models     The Company adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective transition method, which requires the application of the accounting standard as of January 1, 2006, the first day of the Company’s fiscal year 2006. The Company’s Statement of Operations as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 reflects the impact of SFAS 123(R). In accordance with the modified prospective transition method, the Company’s Statements of Operations for prior periods have not been restated to reflect, and do not necessarily provideinclude, the impact of SFAS 123(R). Share-based compensation expense recognized under SFAS 123(R) for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $1,224,454. As of December 31, 2006, there was $952,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding options that is expected to be recognized as a reliable single measurecomponent of the Company’s operating expenses through 2009. Compensation costs will be adjusted for future changes in estimated forfeitures.
     For stock options paid in consideration of services rendered by non-employees, the Company recognizes compensation expense in accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R) and EITF 96-18, as amended, and Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services.” Under SFAS No. 123(R), the compensation associated with stock options paid to non-employees is generally recognized in the period during which services are rendered by such non-employees. Since its adoption of SFAS 123(R), there been no change to its equity plans or modifications of its outstanding stock-based awards.
     Deferred compensation for non-employee option grants that do not vest immediately upon grant are recorded as an expense over the vesting period of the underlying stock options, using the method prescribed by FASB Interpretation 28. At the end of each financial reporting period prior to vesting, the value of these options, as calculated using the Black Scholes option pricing model, will be re-measured using the fair value of its warrantsthe Company’s common stock and employeedeferred compensation and the non-cash compensation recognized during the period will be adjusted accordingly. Since the fair market value of options granted to non-employees is subject to change in the future, the amount of the future compensation expense is subject to adjustment until the stock options.options are fully vested. The Company recognized $734,000 of stock based compensation expense related to non-employee stock options in 2006.
     Research and Development Expenses— Research and development expenses consist of costs incurred for direct and overhead-related research expenses and are expensed as incurred. Costs to acquire technologies which are utilized in research and development and which have no alternative future use are expensed when incurred. Technology developed for use in ourits products is expensed as incurred until technological feasibility has been established. Expenditures to date have been classified as research and development expense.
     Income Taxes— Income taxes are accounted for using an asset and liability approach that requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company’s financial statements or tax returns. A valuation allowance is established to reduce deferred tax assets if all, or some portion, of such assets will more than likely not be realized.
     Concentrations of Credit Risk— Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and note receivable.equivalents. The Company maintains cash and cash equivalents in large well-capitalized financial institutions and the Company’s investment policy disallows investment in any debt securities rated less than “investment-grade” by national ratings services. The Company has not experienced any losses on its deposits of cash and cash equivalents. The Company is at risk to the extent accounts receivable and note receivable amounts become uncollectible.
     Use of Estimates— The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Significant estimates include the accrual for research and development expenses, the basis for the classification of current deferred

F-9


revenue and the estimate of expense arising from the common stock options granted to employees and non-employees. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
     Segment InformationReclassificationsManagement uses consolidated financial information in determining howCertain prior year balances have been reclassified to allocate resources and assess financial performance. For this reason,conform with the Company has determined that it is principally engaged in one industry segment.2006 presentation.
     Other comprehensive income/(loss)— The Company follows the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income,” which requires separate representation of certain transactions, which are recorded directly as components of shareholders’ equity. The Company has no components of other comprehensive income/income (loss). and accordingly comprehensive loss is the same as net loss reported.
3. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
     On December 16, 2004,July 13, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)(“FASB”) issued FASB StatementInterpretation No. 123 (revised 2004)48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, “Share-Based Payment,” or SFAS 123(R), which is a revisionan interpretation of FASB Statement No. 123, “Accounting109 (“FIN No. 48”), to create a single model to address accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” SFAS 123(R) supersedes APB Opinionuncertainty in tax positions. FIN No. 25, “Accounting48 clarifies the accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and amends FASB Statement No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows.” Generally, the approach in SFAS 123(R) is similar to the approach described in Statement 123. However, SFAS 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the statement of operations based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative.
     SFAS 123(R) requiresincome taxes by prescribing a company using the modified prospective transition method to recognize share-based employee costs from the beginning of the fiscal periodminimum recognition threshold in which the recognition provisions are first applied as if the fair value-baseda tax position be reached before financial statement recognition. FIN No. 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting method had been used to accountin interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN No. 48 is effective for all employee awards granted, modified, or settledfiscal years beginning after the effective date and to any awards that were not fully vestedDecember 15, 2006. The Company will adopt FIN No. 48 as of January 1, 2007, as required. While the effective date. Measurement and attribution of compensation cost for awardsCompany has not yet completed its analysis, it does not expect that are

F-9


CYTRX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
nonvested as of the effective date of SFAS 123(R) would be based on the same estimate of the grant-date fair value and the same attribution method used previously under SFAS 123.
     The Company expects the adoption of SFAS 123(R) to result in recognitionFIN No. 48 will have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position and results of additional non-cash stock-based compensation expense which will increase net losses in amounts which likely will be considered material, although it will not impact its cash position (see Note 2).operations.
     In December 2004,On September 15, 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157,Fair Value Measurements(“SFAS 153 (“No. 157”). SFAS 153”), “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions.” SFAS 153 requires exchanges of productive assets to be accounted for at157 defines fair value, rather than at carryover basis, unless (1) neither the asset received nor the asset surrendered hasestablishes a framework for measuring fair value that is determinable within reasonable limits or (2)in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 does not expand the transactions lack commercial substance.use of fair value in any new circumstances. SFAS 153No. 157 is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periodsyears beginning after JuneNovember 15, 2005. Adoption of this standard did2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not expect SFAS No. 157 will have a material effectsignificant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
     In May 2005,September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” (“SAB 108”). SAB 108 provides interpretive guidance on how the effects of the carryover or reversal of prior year misstatements should be considered in quantifying a current year misstatement. The SEC staff believes that registrants should quantify errors using both the balance sheet and income statement approach when quantifying a misstatement. SAB 108 is effective for the Company’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2006. The Company has adopted SAB 108 with no effect on its consolidated financial statements.
     In December 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial FASB Staff Position EITF 00-19-2,Accounting Standards No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections”, (“SFAS 154”for Registration Payment Arrangements(“FSP 00-19-2”). SFAS 154 replaces APB Opinion No. 20, “Accounting Changes,” and SFAS No. 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements,” and changesFSP 00-19-2 specifies that the requirements for the accounting for and reportingcontingent obligation to make future payments or otherwise transfer consideration under a registration payment arrangement, whether issued as a separate agreement or included as a provision of a changefinancial instrument or other agreement, should be separately recognized and measured in accounting principle. We are required to adopt SFAS 154 in 2006. the Company’s results of operationsaccordance with FASB Statement No. 5,Accounting for Contingencies. For registration payment arrangements and financial condition will only be impacted by SFAS 154 if it implements changesinstruments subject to those arrangements that were entered into prior to the issuance of EITF 00-19-2, this guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company has elected to reflect early adoption of FSP 00-19-2 in accounting principles that are addressed byits 2006 financial statements, and the standard or correct accounting errors in future periods.adoption did not have an effect on its financial statements.

F-10


4. InvestmentsAccounts Receivable
     At December 31, 2005,2006, the Company did not have any investments. At December 31, 2004,Company’s accounts receivable balance of $106,000 was the Company held approximately $1.0 million in short-term investments. The contractual maturitiesresult of securities held at December 31, 2004 were one year or less. At December 31, 2004,a grant progress billing to the Company classified allNational Institutes of its investments (consisting entirelyHealth. Due to the certainty of Certificatesthe collectibility of Deposit) as held-to-maturity. The fair market value approximated the carrying costs and gross unrealized and realized gains/losses were immaterial.account receivable, no allowance was recorded.
5. RestrictedOther Assets
     At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company had $171,000 and $150,000, respectively, on deposit with its landlords related to its leased facilities, which were classified as other assets. At December 31, 2004 the Company held approximately $51,000 in investments (consisting entirely of Certificates of Deposit), reported in PrepaidOther Assets.
6. Equipment, Furnishings and Other Current Assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The contractual maturities of securities heldMolecular Library, net
     Equipment, furnishings and molecular library, net, at December 31, 2004 were one year or less. At December 31, 2004, the investments were pledged as collateral for a letter of credit for the same amount issued in connection with one of the Company’s lease agreements. During2006 and 2005 the letter of credit was replaced by a cash deposit for the lease on the rental property.

F-10


CYTRX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
6. Property and Equipment
     Property and equipment at December 31, 2005 and 2004 consist of the following (in thousands):
                
 2005 2004  2006 2005 
Equipment and furnishings $601 $554  $502 $601 
Less — accumulated depreciation  (248)  (106)  (249)  (248)
          
Equipment and furnishings, net 353 448 
Property and equipment, net 253 353 
     
      
Molecular library $447 $447  $447 $447 
Less — accumulated amortization  (75)    (164)  (75)
          
Molecular library, net 372 447  $283 $372 
          
Property and equipment, net $725 $895 
     
     At December 31, 2004, theThe molecular library had beenwas purchased from Biorex in 2004, but was not placed in service by the Company, as the compounds were not physically received until March 2005. Therefore,2005, therefore, no amortization of the related patents was recorded in 2004. The molecular library is being amortized over 60 months, which is less than the estimated effective life of the patents. The result will be that the Company will incur approximately $89,000 in amortization over the next fourthree years and approximately $16,000 in 2010, the final year.
     Depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were $228,000, $217,000 and $104,000, respectively.
7. Accrued Expenses
     Accrued expenses and other current liabilities at December 31, 20052006 and 20042005 are summarized below (in thousands).
         
  2005  2004 
Deferred gain on sale of building (current portion) $  $28 
Accrued loss on facility abandonment (current portion)     106 
Professional fees  205   359 
Research and development costs  911   140 
Accrued bonuses  163   181 
Accrued settlement fee  253   200 
Other miscellaneous  108   60 
       
Total $1,640  $1,074 
       
         
  2006  2005 
Professional fees $900  $205 
Research and development costs  1,013   911 
Bonuses  276   163 
Settlement fees  253   253 
Income taxes  145    
Other  135   108 
       
Total $2,722  $1,640 
       
8. Termination of the Atlanta Facility Lease
     Subsequent to the Company’s merger with Global Genomics in 2002, it recorded a loss of $563,000 associated with the closure of the Atlanta headquarters and its relocation to Los Angeles. This loss represented the total remaining lease obligations and estimated operating costs through the remainder of the lease term, less estimated sublease rental income and deferred rent at the time. In August 2005, the Company entered into a lease termination agreement pursuant to which it was released from all future obligations on the lease in

F-11


exchange for a one-time $110,000 payment and the forfeiture of a $49,000 security deposit. As a result of this agreement the Company realized $164,000 in other income.

F-11


CYTRX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)income in 2005.
9. Commitments and Contingencies
     Minimum annualThe Company acquires assets still in development and enters into research and development arrangements with third parties that often require milestone and royalty payments to the third party contingent upon the occurrence of certain future obligations under operating leases, minimum annual future obligations under various license agreements and minimum annual future obligations under employment agreements consistevents linked to the success of the following (in thousands):
                 
  Operating  License  Employment    
  Leases  Agreements  Agreements  Total 
  (In thousands) 
2006 $507  $971  $1,264  $2,742 
2007  389   235   887   1,511 
2008  108   339   590   1,037 
2009  1   339      340 
2010 and thereafter  2   1,070      1,072 
             
Total $1,007  $2,954  $2,741  $6,702 
             
     Under the various license agreements and sponsored research agreements with University of Massachusetts Medical School (“UMMS”) (see Note 17) and other institutions, CytRx willasset in development. Milestone payments may be required, contingent upon the successful achievement of an important point in the development life-cycle of the pharmaceutical product (e.g., approval of the product for marketing by a regulatory agency). If required by the arrangement, CytRx may have to make annual license maintenanceroyalty payments as well as milestonebased upon a percentage of the sales of the pharmaceutical product in the event that regulatory approval for marketing is obtained. Because of the contingent nature of these payments, ranging from $11 millionthey are not included in the table of contractual obligations.
     These arrangements may be material individually, and in the unlikely event that milestones for multiple products covered by these arrangements were reached in the same period, the aggregate charge to $14 million per approved product,expense could be material to UMMS and/or other institutions based on the results of operations in any one period. In addition, these arrangements often give CytRx the discretion to unilaterally terminate development of products utilizing the licensed technology and will be required to pay royalties, based on future sales of those products, which will generally range from 3% to 7.5% of such sales, depending upon the product, andwhich would allow CytRx to avoid making the technology being utilized. In connection withcontingent payments; however, CytRx is unlikely to cease development if the sponsored research agreements, CytRx agreed to fund certain pre-clinical research at UMMS and other institutions related to the use ofcompound successfully achieves clinical testing objectives. CytRx’s licensed technologies for the development of therapeutic products.current contractual obligations that will require future cash payments are as follows:
     The Company has employment agreements with its executive officers, the terms of which expire at various times through July 2008. Certain agreements, which have been revised from time to time, provide for minimum salary levels, adjusted annually at the Compensation Committee’s determination, as well as for minimum bonuses that are payable. The reported commitment for employment agreements includes, among other things, a total of $0.9 million of compensation payable to members of CytRx’s Scientific Advisory Board, and a total of $1.6 million of salary and guaranteed bonuses payable to CytRx’s executives.
                               
  Non-Cancelable  Cancelable    
  Operating  Employment       Research and  License        
  Leases  Agreements   Subtotal  Development  Agreements   Subtotal    
  (In thousands)     
  (1)  (2)       (3)  (4)       Total 
2007 $534  $1,735   $2,269  $5,583  $1,267   $6,850  $9,119 
2008  138   876    1,014   7,424   332    7,756   8,770 
2009  26   490    516   914   332    1,246   1,762 
2010  10   240    250      282    282   532 
2011 and thereafter  5   120    125      7,455    7,455   7,580 
                        
Total $713  $3,461   $4,174  $13,921  $9,668   $23,589  $27,763 
                        
     Rent expense under operating leases during 2005, 2004 and 2003 was approximately $380,000, $364,000 and $258,000, respectively.
 The Company applies the disclosure provisions of FASB Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others,” (“ FIN 45”), to its agreements that contain guarantee or indemnification clauses. The Company provides (i) indemnifications of varying scope and size to certain investors and other parties for certain losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party in connection with various types of third-party claims; and (ii) indemnifications of varying scope and size to officers and directors against third party claims arising from the services they provide to us. These indemnifications and guarantees give rise only to the disclosure provisions of FIN 45. To date, the Company has not incurred material costs as a result of these obligations and does not expect to incur material costs in the future. Accordingly, the Company has not accrued any liabilities in its consolidated financial statements related to these indemnifications or guarantees.
(1)Operating leases are primarily facility lease related obligations, as well as equipment and software lease obligations with third party vendors. Facility lease expenses during 2006, 2005 and 2004 were approximately $472,000, $380,000 and $364,000, respectively.
(2)Employment agreement obligations include management contracts, as well as scientific advisory board member compensation agreements. Certain agreements, which have been revised from time to time, provide for minimum salary levels, adjusted annually at the discretion of the Company’s Compensation Committee, as well as for minimum bonuses that are payable.
(3)Research and development obligations relate primarily to CytRx’s Phase IIb clinical trial for arimoclomol for ALS. Most of these purchase obligations are cancelable.
(4)License agreements generally relate to CytRx’s obligations for licenses with UMMS associated with RNAi, which CytRx is developing through its majority-owned RXi subsidiary. Included in the 2007 license obligations is an $800,000 payment that may be made in cash or common stock of RXi to UMMS. CytRx anticipates making that payment in common stock of RXi following RXi’s initial funding.

F-12


10. Private Placements of Common Stock
     On March 2, 2006, the Company completed a $13.4 million private equity financing in which it issued 10,650,795 shares of its common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 5,325,397 shares of its common stock at an exercise price of $1.54 per share. Net of investment banking commissions which included 745,556 warrants to purchase CytRx common stock at $1.54 per share, legal, accounting and other expenses related to the transaction, the Company received approximately $12.4 million of proceeds.
     In connection with the financing, the Company adjusted the price and number of underlying shares of warrants to purchase approximately 2.8 million shares that had been issued in prior equity financings in May and September 2003. The adjustment was made as a result of anti-dilution provisions in those warrants that were triggered by the Company’s issuance of common stock in that financing at a price below the closing market price on the date of the transaction. The Company accounted for the anti-dilution adjustments as deemed dividends analogous with the guidance in Emerging Issues Task Force Issues (“EITF”) No. 98-5,Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Ratios,and EITF 00-27, Application of 98-5 to Certain Convertible Instruments,recorded an approximate $488,000 charge to retained earnings and a corresponding credit to additional paid-in capital.
     In January 2005, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with a group of institutional and other investors (the “January 2005 Investors”). The January 2005 Investors purchased, for an aggregate purchase price of

F-12


CYTRX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
$21.3 $21.3 million, 17,334,494 shares of the Company’s common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 8,667,247 shares of the Company’s common stock, at $2.00 per share, expiring in 2010. After consideration of offering expenses, net proceeds to the Company were approximately $19.4 million. The shares and the shares underlying the warrants issued to the January 2005 Investors were subsequently registered. In addition, the Company issued approximately $158,000 worth of common stock in February 2005.
     In connection with the March 2006 and January 2005 private equity financings, the Company entered into a registration rights agreement with the purchasers of its stock and warrants, which provides among other things, for cash penalties in the event that the Company were unable to initially register, or maintain the effective registration of the securities. The Company initially evaluated the penalty provisions in light of EITF 00-19,Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed To, and Potentially Settled In a Company’s Own Stock,and determined that the maximum penalty does not exceed the difference between the fair value of a registered share of CytRx common stock and unregistered share of CytRx common stock on the date of the transaction. The Company then evaluated the provisions of FASB Staff Position No. EITF 00-19-2, Accounting for Registration Payment Arrangements, which specifies that the contingent obligation to make future payments or otherwise transfer consideration under a registration payment arrangement should be separately recognized and measured in accordance with FASB Statement No. 5,Accounting for Contingencies, pursuant to which a contingent obligation must be accrued only if it is more likely than not to occur. In management’s estimation, the contingent payments related to the registration payment arrangement are not likely to occur, and thus no amount need be accrued. The Company has elected to reflect early adoption of FSP 00-19-2 in its 2006 financial statements, and the adoption did not have an effect on its financial statements.
     In connection with the Company’s private equity financing that was consummated on January 20, 2005, the Company adjusted the price and number of underlying shares of warrants to purchase approximately 2.8 million shares that had been issued in prior equity financings in May and September 2003. The adjustment was made as a result of anti-dilution provisions in those warrants that were triggered by the Company’s issuance of common stock in that financing at a price below the closing market price on the date of the transaction. Consistent with EITF No. 98-5 and EITF 00-27 the Company accounted for the anti-dilution adjustments as a deemed dividend, which was recorded as an approximate $1.1 million charge to retained earnings and a corresponding credit to additional paid-in capital.
     In October 2004, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with a group of institutional and other investors (the “October 2004 Investors”). The October 2004 Investors purchased, for an aggregate

F-13


purchase price of $4.0 million, 4,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 3,080,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, at $1.69 per share, expiring in 2009. After consideration of offering expenses, net proceeds to the Company were approximately $3.7 million. The shares and the shares underlying the warrants issued to the October 2004 Investors were subsequently registered. In addition, the Company issued approximately $204,000 worth of common stock in January 2004.
     In September 2003, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with a group of institutional and other investors (the “September 2003 Investors”). The September 2003 Investors purchased, for an aggregate purchase price of $8.7 million, 4,140,486 shares of the Company’s common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 1,035,125 shares of the Company’s common stock, at $3.05 per share, expiring in 2008. After consideration of offering expenses, net proceeds to the Company were approximately $7.7 million. The shares and the shares underlying the warrants issued to the September 2003 Investors were subsequently registered.
     In May 2003, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with a group of institutional investors (the “May 2003 Investors”). The May 2003 Investors purchased, for an aggregate purchase price of $5.4 million , 2,940,539 shares of the Company’s common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 735,136 shares of the Company’s common stock, at $3.05 per share, expiring in 2008. After consideration of offering expenses, net proceeds to the Company were approximately $4.8 million. The shares and the shares underlying the warrants issued to the May 2003 Investors were subsequently registered.
11. Investment in SubsidiaryCytRx Laboratories
     On June 30, 2005, the Company issued 650,000 shares of its common stock to Dr. Michael Czech as part of a transaction in which the Company purchased Dr. Czech’s 5% interest in the Subsidiary, which, asCytRx Laboratories. As a result of thethis purchase, CytRx Laboratories became a wholly-owned subsidiary of CytRx. The SubsidiaryCytRx Laboratories was subsequently merged with and into the Company on September 30, 2005. The purchase of Dr. Czech’s interest in the SubsidiaryCytRx Laboratories was consummated pursuant to the terms of the Stockholders Agreement dated September 17, 2003, by and among CytRx, the SubsidiaryCytRx Laboratories and Dr. Czech, 300,000 ofCzech. Of the shares of CytRx common stock issued to Dr. Czech 300,000 were unrestricted and in exchange for his 5% interest in the Subsidiary. ThatCytRx Laboratories. For financial statement purposes, that stock iswas valued at $0.91 per share, the then fair value of the common stock, for financial statement purposes.stock. The non-cash transaction was accounted for using purchase accounting and resulted in $184,000 of goodwill for financial statement purposes, which represents the difference between the market value of the 300,000 unrestricted shares issued to Dr. Czech and the fair value of the minority interest at June 30, 2005.2005, of $184,000 was recorded as goodwill for financial statement purposes.
12. Merger with Global Genomics
     In July 2002, CytRx acquired Global Genomics, a privately-held genomics holding company, through a merger of GGC Merger Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of CytRx, into Global Genomics. Global Genomics is a genomics holding company that at the time of the merger owned a 40% ownership interest in Blizzard and a 5% ownership interest in Psynomics. CytRx’s primary reasons for the acquisition were to (a) expand its business into the genomics field to diversify its product and technology base, and (b) gain the management and directors of Global

F-13


CYTRX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Genomics, who could assist CytRx in developing corporate partnerships and acquisition, investment and financing opportunities not previously available to CytRx.
Equity in Losses of Blizzard.The Company recorded its portion of the losses of Blizzard using the equity method. The equity in losses of Blizzard and the amortization of the acquired developed technology are reported as a separate line item in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.
Impairment Test of Intangible Assets.In accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 18, The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock (“APB 18”), the Company reviewed the net values on its balance sheet as of September 30, 2003 assigned to Investment in Minority — Owned Entity — Acquired Developed Technology resulting from its acquisition of Global Genomics. CytRx’s analysis consisted of a review of current financial projections prepared by Blizzard, application of a discounted cash flow valuation model of Blizzard’s projected cash flows, and consideration of other qualitative factors. Based upon the quantitative and qualitative factors described above and in addition to others, CytRx’s management determined its investment in Blizzard had no value, and that an impairment charge of $5,868,000 was necessary in 2003.
     As of December 31, 2003, the following assets related to Blizzard were reflected in CytRx’s balance sheets:
     
Investment in minority owned entity — acquired developed technology $7,309,250 
Receivable from Blizzard  16,640 
Less: Accumulated amortization  (883,311)
Less: Equity-method losses to date  (574,381)
Less: Impairment charge  (5,868,198)
    
  $ 
    
13. Severance Payments to Officers
     In May of 2004, in accordance with a Mutual General ReleaseReleases and Severance Agreement in May 2004,Agreements the Company paid the Company’sits former General Counsel, $52,000 and 12 months of related benefits, and immediately vested options to purchase 87,500 shares of its common stock that were granted upon the commencement of his employment. In accordance with a Mutual General Releaseemployment and Severance Agreement in May 2004, the Company paid the Company’sits former Chief Financial Officer, $150,000 and 18 months of related benefits, and immediately vested options to purchase 105,000 shares of its common stock that were granted upon the commencement of his employment.
14.13. Stock Options and Warrants
     CytRx has stock option plans pursuant to which certain key employees, directors and consultants are eligible to receive incentive and/or nonqualified stock options to purchaseOptions
     As of December 31, 2006, an aggregate of 10,000,000 shares of CytRx’s common stock. Fixed options grantedstock were reserved for issuance under the plans generally become exercisable over a three-year period from the dates of grant and have lives of ten years. The Company may also grant stock options and/or warrantsCompany’s 2000 Stock Option Incentive Plan, as amended, including 6,749,000 shares subject to its Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers containing alternative or additional vesting provisions based on the achievement of corporate objectives. Exercise prices of alloutstanding stock options and warrants2,822,750 shares available for employeesfuture grant. Additionally, the Company has two other plans, the 1994 Stock Option Plan and directorsthe 1998 Long Term Incentive Plan, which include 9,167 and 100,041 shares subject to outstanding stock options. As the terms of its plans provide that no options may be issued after 10 years, no options are set atavailable under the 1994 Plan. Under the 1998 Long Term Incentive Plan, 29,517 shares are available for future grant. Options granted under these plans generally vest and become exercisable as to 33% of the option grants on each anniversary of the grant date until fully vested. The options will expire, unless previously exercised, not later than ten years from the grant date.
     In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment (Revised 2004)” (“SFAS 123(R)”), that addresses the accounting for, among other things, transactions in which a company receives employee services in exchange for equity instruments of the company. The statement precludes accounting for employee share-based compensation transactions using the intrinsic method, and requires that such transactions be accounted for using a fair-value-based method and that the fair market valuesvalue of the common stocktransaction be recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the dates of grant.
vesting period. In connection with the Company’s private equity financings that were consummated on October 4, 2004 and January 20,March 2005, the Company re-priced warrants to purchase approximately 2.8 million shares as a resultSEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 107 (“SAB 107”) regarding the Staff’s interpretation of anti-dilution provisions in those warrants that were triggered bySFAS 123(R). This interpretation provides the Company’s issuance of common stock in these equity financings at a price below the closing market price on the dateStaff’s views regarding interactions between SFAS 123(R) and certain SEC rules and regulations and provides interpretations of the transaction. The warrants were issuedvaluation of share-based payments for public companies. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provision of SFAS 123(R) using the modified- prospective method.

F-14


CYTRX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
in connection with the Company’s May and September 2003 private investment in public equity (PIPE) transactions.     The antidilution provision is required to be accounted for as a liability under SFAS 150 and is adjusted on a mark to market basis. To date the fair value of the liability has been immaterial. Pursuant to the anti-dilution provision, the exercise price of these warrants was reduced from $3.05 per share, to $2.70 per share, and the number of shares underlying the warrants was increased to approximately 3.1 million shares.
     In connection with the Company’s acquisition of Global Genomics in July 2002 (see Note 12), CytRx issued 1,014,677 warrants to the holders of Global Genomics warrants in return for the cancellation of all of their outstanding Global Genomics warrants. The new warrants were 100% vested upon their issuance, have an exercise price of $0.01 per share and expire on January 31, 2007. Additionally, the acquisition of Global Genomics triggered the “Change of Control” provisions contained in the Company’s stock option plans and in the warrants held by the Company’s Former CEO, resulting in the immediate vesting of all outstanding warrants held by the Former CEO and of all outstanding stock options issued pursuant to the Company’s various stock options plans.
     WeCompany recorded approximately $586,000,$1.3 million, $600,000 and $1.1 million and $1.6 million of non-cash charges related to the issuance of stock options and warrants to certain consultants in exchange for services during 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
     The following table illustrates the pro forma effect on net loss and 2003, respectively.net loss per share assuming the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 to options granted under the Company’s stock option plans for the years ending December 31, 2005 and 2004. For purposes of this presentation, the value of the options is estimated using a Black Scholes option-pricing model and recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the options’ vesting periods. Numbers presented are in thousands with the exception of per share data.
         
  Years Ended December 31, 
  2005  2004 
  (restated)     
Net loss applicable to common stockholders $(16,168) $(16,392)
Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair-value based method for all awards  (1,388)  (1,415)
       
Pro forma net loss $(17,556) $(17,807)
       
Loss per share, as originally reported (basic and diluted) $(0.27) $(0.48)
Loss per share, as restated (basic and diluted) $(0.28) $(0.48)
Loss per share, pro forma (basic and diluted) $(0.31) $(0.52)
     The table above reflects a restatement of the net loss for 2005 to reflect the adjustment of approximately $1.1. million for deemed dividends in arriving at net loss applicable to common stockholders.
     The fair value of stock options at the date of grant was estimated based on the following assumptions:
             
  2006 2005 2004
Weighted average risk free interest rate  4.91%  4.10%  3.65%
Dividend yields  0%  0%  0%
Weighted average volatility  112%  109%  117%
Expected lives (years)  6   8   8 
Weighted average years outstanding  7.5   4.8   5.8 
     The Company’s expected stock price volatility assumption is based upon the historical daily volatility of its publicly traded stock. For option grants issued during the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company used a calculated volatility for each grant. The expected life assumption for 2006 was based upon the simplified method provided for under SAB 107, which averages the contractual term of the Company’s options of ten years with the average vesting term of three years for an average of six years. Prior to our adoption of SFAS 123(R), the expected life assumption was based on management’s estimate of 8 years. The dividend yield assumption of zero is based upon the fact the Company has never paid cash dividends and presently has no intention of paying cash dividends. The risk-free interest rate used for each grant is equal to the U.S. Treasury rates in effect at the time of the grant for instruments with a similar expected life. Based on historical experience, for 2006, the Company has estimated an annualized forfeiture rate of 10% for options granted to its employees and 3% for options granted to senior management and directors. The Company will record additional expense if the actual forfeitures are lower than estimated and will record a recovery of prior expense if the actual forfeiture rates are higher than estimated. Prior to the implementation of SFAS 123(R), the Company accounted for forfeitures on an as-occurred basis. Management has concluded that the changes in assumptions used between SFAS 123 and SFAS 123(R) do not have a significant effect on the Company’s recorded expenses. Under provisions of SFAS 123(R), the Company recorded $1,224,454 of stock-based compensation for the year ended December 31, 2006. No amounts relating to employee stock-based compensation have been capitalized.

F-15


     At December 31, 2006, there remained approximately $1 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested employee stock options to be recognized as expense over a weighted-average period of 6 years. Presented below is the Company’s stock option activity:
                         
              Weighted Average
  Stock Options Exercise Price
  2006 2005 2004 2006 2005 2004
Outstanding — beginning of year  6,205,542   4,741,042   2,778,042  $1.71  $1.93  $2.08 
Granted  1,033,500   1,519,500   2,318,000   1.30   0.95   1.73 
Exercised  (82,500)  (17,000)  (55,000)  0.97   0.92   0.89 
Forfeited  (1,667)  (38,000)  (285,000)  1.00   1.52   2.00 
Expired  (296,667)     (15,000)  1.59      3.16 
                         
Outstanding — end of year  6,858,208   6,205,542   4,741,042   1.66   1.69   1.93 
                         
Exercisable at end of year  4,758,330   3,438,157   2,136,898  $1.80  $1.89  $1.94 
                         
Weighted average fair value of stock options granted during the year: $1.11  $0.95  $1.73             
     A summary of the activity for nonvested stock options as of December 31, and changes during the year is presented below:
                         
              Weighted Average
              Grant Date Fair
  Stock Options Value per Share
  2006 2005 2004 2006 2005 2004
Nonvested at January 1,  2,767,384   2,604,161   2,304,388  $1.30  $1.72  $1.99 
Granted  1,033,500   1,519,500   2,318,000   1.11   0.82   1.52 
Vested  (1,497,674)  (1,356,277)  (1,753,227)  1.34   1.54   1.81 
Pre-vested forfeitures  (203,333)     (265,000)  1.16      1.73 
                         
Nonvested at December 31,  2,099,877   2,767,384   2,604,161   1.19   1.30   1.72 
                         
     The following table summarizes significant ranges of outstanding stock options under the three plans at December 31, 2006:
                         
      Weighted Average          
      Remaining     Number of    
     Range of     Contractual Life Weighted Average Options Weighted Average Weighted Average
  Exercise Prices Number of Options (years) Exercise Price Exercisable Contractual Life Exercise Price
$0.25 — 1.00  1,147,709   7.50  $0.81   667,890   7.50  $0.81 
$1.01 — 1.50  1,763,000   8.70   1.25   905,771   8.70   1.25 
$1.51 — 2.00  2,284,500   7.14   1.86   1,534,170   7.14   1.86 
$2.01 — 3.00  1,662,999   6.61   2.43   1,650,499   6.61   2.44 
                         
   6,858,208   7.47  $1.66   4,758,330   7.47  $1.80 
                         
     The aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding options as of December 31, 2006, was $2,558,000 of which $1,414,000 is related to exercisable options. The aggregate intrinsic value was calculated based on the positive difference between the closing fair market value of the Company’s common stock on December 31, 2006 ($1.91) and the exercise price of the underlying options. The intrinsic value of options exercised was $15,000 and $59,000 for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2006, and the intrinsic value of options vested was $117,000 and $775,000 during these same periods.

F-16


Warrants
     A summary of the Company’s stock option and warrant activity and related information for the years ended December 31 is shown below.
                         
              Weighted Average 
  Stock Options  Exercise Price 
  2005  2004  2003  2005  2004  2003 
Outstanding — beginning of year  4,741,042   2,778,042   1,194,038  $1.93  $2.08  $1.10 
Granted  1,516,500   2,318,000   2,463,000   0.95   1.73   2.26 
Exercised  (17,000)  (55,000)  (817,484)  0.92   0.89   0.71 
Forfeited  (38,000)  (285,000)  (50,000)  1.52   2.00   1.00 
Expired     (15,000)  (11,512)     3.16   1.00 
                      
Outstanding — end of year  6,202,542   4,741,042   2,778,042   1.69   1.93   2.08 
                      
Exercisable at end of year  3,438,157   2,136,898   650,816  $1.89  $1.94  $1.69 
                      
Weighted average fair value of stock options granted during the year: $0.95  $1.73  $2.26             
                         
              Weighted Average 
  Warrants  Exercise Price 
  2005  2004  2003  2005  2004  2003 
Outstanding — beginning of year  9,735,416   7,352,077   5,432,787  $1.64  $1.61  $1.10 
Granted  10,267,887   3,884,778   5,611,917   1.96   1.58   1.81 
Exercised  (1,294,354)  (976,439)  (2,083,397)  0.55   0.74   0.81 
Forfeited     (500,000)  (825,000)     2.25   0.32 
Expired  (200,000)  (25,000)  (784,230)  1.00   0.80   2.32 
                      
Outstanding — end of year  18,508,949   9,735,416   7,352,077   1.94   1.64   1.61 
                      
Exercisable at end of year  18,508,949   9,735,416   6,752,070  $1.94  $1.58  $1.57 
                      
Weighted average fair value of warrants granted during the year: $2.00  $1.36  $1.81             

F-15


CYTRX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
                         
              Weighted Average
  Warrants Exercise Price
  2006 2005 2004 2006 2005 2004
Outstanding — beginning of year  18,508,949   9,735,416   7,352,077  $1.94  $1.64  $1.61 
Granted  6,112,870   10,267,887   3,884,778   1.54   1.96   1.58 
Exercised  (1,261,654)  (1,294,354)  (976,439)  1.16   0.55   0.74 
Forfeited        (500,000)        2.25 
Expired     (200,000)  (25,000)     1.00   0.80 
                         
Outstanding — end of year  23,360,165   18,508,949   9,735,416   1.83   1.94   1.64 
                         
Exercisable at end of year  23,360,165   18,508,949   9,735,416  $1.83  $1.94  $1.58 
                         
Weighted average fair value of warrants granted during the year: $1.54  $2.00  $1.36             
     The following table summarizes additional information concerning stock options and warrants outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2005:2006:
                     
  Stock Options Outstanding  Stock Options Exercisable 
      Weighted Average           
      Remaining      Number of    
  Number of  Contractual Life  Weighted Average  Shares  Weighted Average 
Range of Exercise Prices Shares  (years)  Exercise Price  Exercisable  Exercise Price 
$0.25 - 1.05  1,307,043   7.5  $0.82   401,099  $0.84 
1.06 - 1.79  918,000   6.8   1.27   350,868   1.27 
1.80 - 2.63  3,980,499   7.5   2.08   2,686,191   2.11 
                   
   6,205,542   7.4  $1.69   3,438,158  $1.88 
                   
                     
  Warrants Outstanding  Warrants Exercisable  
      Weighted Average           
      Remaining      Number of    
  Number of  Contractual Life  Weighted Average  Shares  Weighted Average 
Range of Exercise Prices Shares  (years)  Exercise Price  Exercisable  Exercise Price 
$0.20 - 1.05  1,319,367   3.3  $0.68   1,319,367  $0.68 
1.06 - 1.79  4,341,803   1.6   1.57   4,341,803   1.57 
1.80 - 2.67  10,735,282   2.0   2.00   10,735,282   2.00 
2.68 - 2.73  2,112,497   2.7   2.73   2,112,497   2.73 
                   
   18,508,949   2.1  $1.89   18,508,949  $1.89 
                   
                     
  Warrants Outstanding    
      Weighted        
      Average     Warrants  
      Remaining Weighted Number of Exercisable
  Number of Contractual Life Average Shares Weighted Average
Range of Exercise Prices Shares (years) Exercise Price Exercisable Exercise Price
$0.20 - 1.05  506,362   .05  $.21   506,362  $.21 
$1.06 - 1.79  10,079,726   3.92   1.56   10,079,726   1.56 
$1.80 - 2.67  10,632,966   3.16   2.00   10,632,966   2.00 
$2.68 - 2.70  2,141,111   1.66   2.70   2,141,111   2.70 
                     
   23,360,165   3.28  $1.83   23,360,165  $1.83 
                     
15.14. Stockholder Protection Rights Plan
     Effective April 16, 1997, the Company’s Boardboard of Directorsdirectors declared a distribution of one right (“Rights”) for each outstanding share of the Company’s common stock to stockholders of record at the close of business on May 15, 1997 and for each share of common stock issued by the Company thereafter and prior to a Flip-in Date (as defined below). Each Right entitles the registered holder to purchase from the Company one-ten thousandth (1/10,000th) of a share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, at an exercise price of $30. The Rights are generally not exercisable until 10 business days after an announcement by the Company that a person or group of affiliated persons (an “Acquiring Person”) has acquired beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the Company’s then outstanding shares of common stock (a “Flip-in Date”). In connection with the merger agreement with Global Genomics, the Company’s Board of Directors amended the stockholders protection rights agreement to exempt the merger from triggering a Flip-in Date.
     In the event the Rights become exercisable as a result of the acquisition of shares, each Right will enable the owner, other than the Acquiring Person, to purchase at the Right’s then-current exercise price a number of shares of common stock with a market value equal to twice the exercise price. In addition, unless the Acquiring Person owns more than 50% of the outstanding shares of common stock, the Board of Directors may elect to exchange all outstanding Rights (other than those owned by such Acquiring Person) at an exchange ratio of one share of common stock per Right. All Rights that are owned by any person on or after the date such person becomes an Acquiring Person will be null and void.
     The Rights have been distributed to protect the Company’s stockholders from coercive or abusive takeover tactics and to give the Board of Directors more negotiating leverage in dealing with prospective acquirors. The Company recently extended the stockholder rights plan through April 2017.

F-16F-17


CYTRX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
16.15. Income Taxes
     For income tax purposes, CytRxAt December 31, 2006, the Company had United States federal and its subsidiaries have an aggregate of approximately $35.6 million ofstate net operating lossesloss carryforwards of $87.2 million and $28.0 million, respectively, available to offset against future taxable income, subject to certain limitations. Such losseswhich expire in 20062007 through 2025 as2026. As a result of a change in-control that occurred in the CytRx shareholder base in July 2002, approximately $51.8 million in federal net operating loss carryforwards became limited in their availability to $747,000 annually. The remaining $35.4 million in federal net operating loss carryforwards, and the $27.4 million in state net operating loss carryforwards, are unrestricted. Additionally, due to the change-in-control, approximately $6.3 million of research and development tax credits will not be available for utilization and were written off. As of December 31, 2005.2006, CytRx also has an aggregate of approximately $6.4 million ofhad research and development and orphan drug credits for federal and state purposes of approximately $2.1 million and $200,000, respectively, available for offset against future income taxes, thatwhich expire in 20062007 through 2025. The amount of net operating loss carryforwards and research tax credits available to reduce income taxes in any particular year may be limited in certain circumstances.2026. Based on an assessment of all available evidence including, but not limited to, the Company’s limited operating history in its core business and lack of profitability, uncertainties of the commercial viability of its technology, the impact of government regulation and healthcare reform initiatives, and other risks normally associated with biotechnology companies, the Company has concluded that it is more likely than not that these net operating loss carryforwards and credits will not be realized and, as a result, a 100% deferred tax valuation allowance has been recorded against these assets.
     Deferred income taxes reflect the net effect of temporary differences between the financial reporting carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and income tax carrying amounts of assets and liabilities. The components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities, all of which are long-term, are as follows (in thousands):
         
  December 31, 
  2005  2004 
Deferred tax assets:        
Net operating loss carryforward $35,607  $30,231 
Tax credit carryforward  6,443   6,363 
Property and equipment and capital losses  4,476   4,559 
       
Total deferred tax assets  46,526   41,153 
Deferred tax liabilities — Depreciation and other  (2,730)  (2,665)
       
Net deferred tax assets  43,796   38,488 
Valuation allowance  (43,796)  (38,488)
       
  $  $ 
       
     Based on assessments of all available evidence as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, management has concluded that the respective deferred income tax assets should be reduced by valuation allowances equal to the amounts of the net deferred income tax assets since it is management’s conclusion that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Furthermore, it is likely the July 19, 2002 acquisition of Global Genomics, and the Company’s subsequent private investment in public equity transactions, caused a change of ownership as defined by Internal Revenue Code Section 382 which may substantially limit the ability of the Company to utilize net operating losses incurred prior to the dates of those transactions. Generally, the net operating losses will be limited to an annual utilization of approximately 4.9% of the purchase price of Global Genomics.
         
  December 31, 
  2006  2005 
Deferred tax assets:        
Net operating loss carryforward $30,892  $35,607 
Tax credit carryforward  2,391   6,443 
Equipment, furnishings and other  1,547   4,476 
Deferred revenue  9,085    
       
Total deferred tax assets  43,915   46,526 
Deferred tax liabilities — Prepaid insurance  (85)  (2,730)
       
Net deferred tax assets  43,830   43,796 
Valuation allowance  (43,830)  (43,796)
       
  $  $ 
       
     For all years presented, the Company did not recognize any deferred tax assets or liabilitiesliabilities. The net change in valuation allowance for the years ended December 31, 2006 and deferred tax provision or benefit.

F-17


CYTRX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)2005 were increases of $34,000 and $5,308,000, respectively.
     The provision for income taxes differs from the provision computed by applying the Federal statutory rate to net loss before income taxes as follows (in thousands):
                        
 December 31,  Years ended December 31, 
 2005 2004 2003  2006 2005 2004 
Federal benefit at statutory rate $(5,128) $(5,570) $(6,066) $(5,646) $(5,128) $(5,570)
State income taxes, net of Federal taxes  (603)  (655)  (1,070)  (968)  (603)  (655)
Permanent differences 736 1,103 1,200  143 736 1,103 
Provision (benefit) related to change in valuation allowance 5,308 5,122 7,414 
Other  (313)   (1,478)
Provision related to change in valuation allowance 34 5,308 5,122 
Net write-off of research and development tax credits 5,059   
Change in state tax rates 2,160 
Other, net  (637)  (313)  
              
 $ $ $  $145 $ $ 
              

F-18


17.16. License Agreements
     University of Massachusetts Medical School(UMMS)In April 2003,May 2006, CytRx acquired the rights to new technologiesexpanded its relationship with UMMS by entering into exclusivea new co-exclusive license arrangements with the UMMS covering potential applicationsagreement related to a patent application for chemical modifications of the medical institution’s proprietary gene silencing technology in the treatment of specified diseases, including those within the areas of obesity and type 2 diabetes, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, commonly known as Lou Gehrig’s disease (ALS), human cytomegalovirus, and covering UMMS’s proprietary technology with potential gene therapy applications within the area of cancer.RNAi invented by Tariq M. Rana, Ph.D. In consideration of the licenses,that license, CytRx made a cash payments to UMMS totaling approximately $186,000payment of $75,000 and, in December 2006, issued it a total of 1,613,258150,000 shares of CytRx common stock which were valued, for financial statement purposes, at approximately $1,468,000, the then fair value of the common stock. In May 2003, CytRx broadened its strategic alliance with UMMS by acquiring an exclusive license from that institution covering a proprietary DNA-based HIV vaccine technology. In consideration of this license, CytRx made cash payments to UMMS totaling approximately $18,000 and issued it 215,101 shares of CytRx common stock, which were valued for financial statement purposes at approximately $361,000. In July 2004, CytRx further expanded its strategic alliance with UMMS by entering into a collaboration and invention disclosure agreement with UMMS under which UMMS will disclose to CytRx certain new technologies developed at UMMS over a three-year period pertaining to RNAi, diabetes, obesity, neurodegenerative diseases (including ALS) and CMV and will give CytRx an option, upon making a specified payment, to negotiate an exclusive worldwide license to the disclosed technologies on commercially reasonable terms. Approximately one year remains on the technology disclosure option. As of December 31, 2005, CytRx has not acquired or made any payments to acquire any options under that Collaboration Agreement.$263,000.
     In May 2004, CytRx licensed from the technology transfer company of the Imperial College of Science, Technology & Medicine, or Imperial College, the exclusive rights to intellectual property covering a drug screening method using RIP 140, which is a nuclear hormone co-repressor that is believed to regulate fat accumulation. In consideration of the license, CytRx made cash payments to Imperial College totaling $87,000 and issued it a total of 75,000 shares of CytRxits common stock which were valued, for financial statement purposes, at $108,000. As
     Because the drug screening technologytechnologies licensed from UMMS and Imperial College and the RNAi technology from UMMS had not achieved technological feasibility at the time of their license bythat CytRx licensed them, had no alternative future uses and, therefore, no separate economic value, the total valuecost of all cash payments and stock issued for acquisition of the technology was expensed as research and development in our financial statements.

F-18


CYTRX CORPORATIONdevelopment.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
18.17. Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)
     Summarized quarterly financial data for 20052006 and 20042005 is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
                                
 Quarter Ended 
 March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31 
 (In thousands, except per share data) 
 (restated) 
2006
 
Total revenues $61 $ $776 $1,229 
Net loss  (4,166)  (5,465)  (2,972)  (4,148)
Deemed dividend for anti-dilution adjustments made to outstanding common stock warrants  (488)    
         
Net loss applicable to common stockholders $(4,654) $(5,465) $(2,972) $(4,148)
         
Basic and diluted loss per share applicable to common stock $(0.07) $(0.08) $(0.04) $(0.06)
 Quarter Ended         
 March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31 
 (In thousands, except per share data) (restated) 
2005
  
Total revenues $2 $ $10 $173  $1 $ $10 $173 
Net loss  (3,527)  (4,509)  (3,492)  (3,565)  (3,527)  (4,509)  (3,492)  (3,565)
Basic and diluted loss per common share: 
Net loss $(0.07) $(0.08) $(0.06) $(0.06)
2004
 
Total revenues $100 $228 $ $100 
Net loss  (3,774)  (4,061)  (2,796)  (5,761)
Basic and diluted loss per common share: 
Net loss $(0.11) $(0.12) $(0.08) $(0.15)
Deemed dividend for anti-dilution adjustments made to outstanding common stock warrants  (1,076)    
         
Net loss applicable to common stockholders $(4,603) $(4,509) $(3,492) $(3,565)
         
Basic and diluted loss per share applicable to common stock $(0.09) $(0.08) $(0.06) $(0.06)
         
     Quarterly and year to date loss per share amounts are computed independently of each other. Therefore, the sum of the per share amounts for the quarters may not agree to the per share amounts for the year.
     Our Statement of Operations as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 reflects the impact of SFAS 123(R). In accordance with the modified prospective transition method, our results of operations for prior periods have not been restated to reflect the impact of SFAS 123(R). Share-based compensation expense recognized under SFAS 123(R) for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $1.2 million.
     In connection with the Company’s adjustment to the exercise terms of certain outstanding warrants to purchase common stock on March 2, 2006 and January 20, 2005, the Company recorded deemed dividends of

F-19


$488,000 and $1.1 million, respectively. These deemed dividends are reflected as an adjustment to net loss for the first quarter of 2006 and the year ended 2005, as restated, to arrive at net loss applicable to common stockholders on the consolidated statement of operations and for purposes of calculating basic and diluted earnings per shares. The Company’s quarterly financial data has been restated to reflect the impact of the deemed dividend upon the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
19.18. Related Party Transactions
     Dr. Michael Czech, who was until June 30, 2005 a 5% minority shareholder of the Company’s prior subsidiary, CytRx Laboratories, and who is a member of the Company’s Scientific Advisory Board, is an employee of UMMS and iswas the principal investigator for a sponsored research agreement between the Company and UMMS. During each of2006, 2005 and 2004, Dr. Czech was paid $80,000 for his Scientific Advisory Board services. In addition, during 2005 and 2004, the Company paid UMMS $1,410,000 and $403,000, respectively, under a sponsored research agreement to fund a portion of Dr. Czech’s research.
20. Subsequent Event     RXi was incorporated jointly in April 2006 by CytRx and the four current members of RXi’s scientific advisory board for the purpose of pursuing the possible development or acquisition of RNAi-related technologies and assets.
     On March 2, 2006,January 8, 2007, the Company completedentered into a $13.4 million private equity financingContribution Agreement with RXi under which the Company assigned and contributed to RXi substantially all of its RNAi-related technologies and assets, and entered into a letter agreement with RXi under which RXi has agreed to reimburse the Company, following its initial funding, for all organizational and operational expenses incurred by the Company in connection with the formation, initial operations and funding of RXi.
     Tod Woolf, Ph.D., the President and Chief Executive Officer of RXi, is one of the Company’s executive officers. The Company recently entered into an employment agreement with Dr. Woolf under which we issued 10,650,794he is entitled to base annual compensation and other employee benefits, including the right to receive, upon completion of RXi’s initial funding, a grant by RXi of stock options to purchase a number of shares of ourRXi common stock and warrantsequal to purchase an additional 5,325,3973/70ths of the number of RXi shares of our common stockheld by CytRx immediately prior to the initial funding at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of $1.54 per share. Netthe shares at the time of investment banking commissions, legal, accountinggrant.
     Dr. Woolf may be deemed to have a material interest in the Company’s transactions with RXi described above, and in its future dealings with RXi, by reason his status as RXi’s President and Chief Executive Officer and in light of any stock options granted to him by RXi upon completion of its initial funding or otherwise.
19. Subsequent Events
     On January 8, 2007, CytRx entered into a Contribution Agreement with RXi under which CytRx assigned and contributed to RXi substantially all of its RNAi-related technologies and assets. The licensed technologies include patent applications on RNAi target sequences, chemical modifications and delivery to cells, field-specific licenses to a patent application on chemical modification of RNAi, the “Tuschl I” patent, and CytRx’s exclusive licenses to patent applications that disclose gene targets for diabetes and obesity, including RIP140. In connection with the contribution of the licenses and other feesassets, RXi assumed primary responsibility for all payments to UMMS and other obligations under the contributed licenses and assets.
     In addition to the RNAi licenses and rights that CytRx contributed to RXi, on January 10, 2007, RXi entered into three exclusive, worldwide, sublicenseable licenses with UMMS for three different patent families and one non-exclusive, worldwide, non-sublicensable license for a fourth patent family, pursuant to which UMMS granted RXi rights under certain UMMS patent applications to make, use and sell products related to applications of RNAi technologies. The 2007 UMMS licenses include an exclusive license covering nanotransporters, which may be effective in the transaction, wedelivery of RNAi compounds, as well as methods and potential compounds for the potential treatment of ALS that can be delivered locally to the central nervous system.

F-20


     As consideration for the UMMS licenses entered into in 2007, CytRx paid UMMS an aggregate up-front fee of $75,000 and reimbursed UMMS $103,000 for previously incurred patent expenses. Upon the completion of RXi’s initial funding, RXi will be obligated to pay UMMS an additional license fee of $175,000 and issue to UMMS an aggregate of $1,600,000 of RXi common stock that is to be valued, on a per share basis for this purpose based on the valuation of RXi in its initial funding.
     The foregoing license agreements with UMMS require the Company to make aggregate payments of up to $300,000 in 2007. In subsequent periods, the Company will be required to make payments ranging from $250,000 to $1.7 million per year to maintain the licenses. The Company is obligated to pay legal expenses for the prosecution of patents licensed from UMMS, which the Company anticipates will be approximately $175,000 during 2007, and to make milestone payments to UMMS based upon its progress in the clinical development and marketing of products utilizing the technologies licensed from UMMS. In the event that the Company were to successfully develop a product in each of the categories of obesity/type 2 diabetes and ALS, these milestone payments could aggregate up to $27.4 million. The Company also would be required to pay royalties to UMMS based on the net sales of those products. The actual milestone payments will vary, perhaps significantly, based upon the milestones the Company achieves and the products, if any, the Company develops.
     On January 10, 2007, RXi also entered into an invention disclosure agreement with UMMS pursuant to which UMMS is obligated for a three-year period to disclose to RXi any unrestricted inventions conceived or reduced to practice by UMMS related to therapeutic applications of RNAi technologies. Upon completion of RXi’s initial funding, RXi will be obligated to pay UMMS $100,000 in cash, and additionally either pay UMMS another $800,000 in cash or issue to UMMS $800,000 of RXi common stock, that is to be valued on a per share basis for this purpose based on the valuation of RXi in the initial funding. RXi also will be obligated to pay UMMS $100,000 on each of the first and second anniversaries of the effective date of the invention disclosure agreement.
     As of January 8, 2007, CytRx entered into a letter agreement with RXi under which RXi has agreed to reimburse CytRx, following its initial funding, for all organizational and operational expenses incurred by CytRx in connection with the formation, initial operations and funding of RXi. As of February 28, 2007, CytRx has advanced approximately $592,000 to RXi for which it will be obligated to reimburse CytRx.
     The Company applies the disclosure provisions of FASB Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others” (“ FIN 45”), to its agreements that contain guarantee or indemnification clauses. The Company provides (i) indemnifications of varying scope and size to certain investors and other parties for certain losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party in connection with various types of third-party claims; and (ii) indemnifications of varying scope and size to officers and directors against third party claims arising from the services they provide to us. These indemnifications and guarantees give rise only to the disclosure provisions of FIN 45. To date, the Company has not incurred material costs as a result of these obligations and does not expect to incur material costs in the future. Accordingly, the Company has not accrued any liabilities in its consolidated financial statements related to these indemnifications or guarantees.
     As of March 23, 2007, the Company has received proceedsapproximately $11.0 million in connection with the exercise of approximately $12.4 million.warrants and options since December 31, 2006. The exercise price of the warrants and options ranged from $0.20 to $2.70.

F-19F-21


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors and Stockholders
CytRx Corporation
Los Angeles, California
     We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of CytRx Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20052006 and 20042005 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flowflows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005.2006. We have also audited the schedule listed in the accompanying index on page F-1.index. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thethese financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
     We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and schedule are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includesstatements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
     In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of CytRx Corporation and subsidiaries as ofat December 31, 20052006 and 20042005, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005,2006, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
     Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
BDO Seidman, LLP
Los Angeles, California
March 15, 2006
     As more fully described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment.”
     As described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has restated its statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2005 for an error in the presentation of deemed dividends resulting in the presentation of net loss allocable to common stockholders and correction of basic and diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2005.
     We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of CytRx Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated April 2, 2007, expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting and an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting due to material weaknesses.
BDO Seidman, LLP
Los Angeles, California
April 2, 2007

F-20F-22


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Stockholders
CytRx Corporation
Los Angeles, California
     We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Item 9A, Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that CytRx Corporation did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, because of the effect of material weaknesses in financial reporting, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). CytRx Corporation’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
     We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
     A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
     Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
     A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. The following material weaknesses have been identified and included in management’s assessment. The Company did not maintain effective controls over the application of generally accepted accounting principles arising from its accounting for anti-dilution adjustments in its calculation of loss per share for the quarters ended March 31, June 30 and September 30, 2005 and 2006. Also, the Company did not maintain effective controls over its

F-23


quarterly and annual financial reporting process due to the misclassification of research and development expenses for the quarters ended March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31, 2006. As a result of these material weaknesses, there is a more than remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements would not have been prevented or detected. These material weaknesses were considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2006 financial statements, and this report does not effect our report dated April 2, 2007.
     In our opinion, management’s assessment that CytRx Corporation did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also in our opinion, because of the effect of the material weaknesses described above on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, CytRx Corporation has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the COSO criteria.
     We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of CytRx Corporation as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006, and our report dated April 2, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
BDO Seidman, LLP
Los Angeles, California
April 2, 2007

F-24


CYTRX CORPORATION
SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 2004 and 20032004
                                        
 Additions   Additions  
 Balance at Charged to Charged to   Balance at Charged to Charged to  
 Beginning of Costs and Other Balance at Beginning of Costs and Other Balance at
Description Period Expenses Accounts Deductions End of Period Year Expenses Accounts Deductions End of Year
Reserve Deducted in the Balance Sheet from the Asset to Which it Applies:  
Allowance for Bad Debts 
Allowance for Deferred Tax Assets 
Year ended December 31, 2006 $43,796,000 $ $34,000 $ $43,830,000 
Year ended December 31, 2005 $ $ $ $ $  38,488,000  5,308,000  43,796,000 
Year ended December 31, 2004 $ $ $ $ $  36,478,000  2,008,000  38,488,000 
Year ended December 31, 2003  4,939 16,640 21,579  
Allowance for Deferred Tax Assets 
Year ended December 31, 2005 $38,488,000 $ $5,308,000 $ $43,796,000 
Year ended December 31, 2004 36,478,000 $ $2,008,000 $ $38,488,000 
Year ended December 31, 2003 29,064,000  7,414,000 $ 36,478,000 

F-21F-25