UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
Form 10-K
 
   
 
þ
 
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  
For the fiscal year endedSeptember 30, 20072008
or
o
 
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  For the transition period from ­ ­ to ­ ­
 
Commission file number0-8408
 
WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
   
Delaware 
36-1984010
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
1000 East Drake Road,
Fort Collins, Colorado
 80525
(Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive offices)  
 
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
 
(970)482-5811
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
 
   
Title of Each Class: Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered:
Common stock, par value $.002917$.001455 per share NASDAQ Global Select Market
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes þ  No o
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes o  No þ
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o
 
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 ofRegulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of thisForm 10-K or any amendment to thisForm 10-K.  o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filerfiler” and large accelerated filer”“smaller reporting company” in RuleRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
 
Large accelerated filer þAccelerated filer oNon-accelerated filer oSmaller reporting company o
Large accelerated filerþ           Accelerated filero           Non-accelerated filero(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2 of the Act).  Yes o  No þ
 
Aggregate market value of registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based upon the closing price of a share of the registrant’s common stock on March 30, 200731, 2008 as reported on theThe NASDAQ Global Select Market on that date: $1,187,051,000.$1,550,848,000. For purposes of this calculation, shares of common stock held by (i) persons holding more than 5% of the outstanding shares of stock, (ii) officers and directors of the registrant, and (iii) the Woodward Governor Company Profit Sharing Trust, Woodward Governor Company Deferred Shares Trust, or the Woodward Governor Company Charitable Trust, as of March 30, 2007,31, 2008, are excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination is not necessarily conclusive of affiliate status.
 
Number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding as of November 20, 2007: 33,872,397.17, 2008: 67,789,021.
 
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
 
Portions of our proxy statement for the 2007 annual meeting2008 Annual Meeting of shareholdersStockholders to be held January 23, 2008,22, 2009, are incorporated by reference into Parts II and III of thisForm 10-K, to the extent indicated.
 


 

 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
         
    Page
 
2
   Business  23 
   Risk Factors  69 
   Unresolved Staff Comments  1016 
   Properties  1117 
   Legal Proceedings  1118 
   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders  1118 
 
   Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities  1219 
   Selected Financial Data  1420 
   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations  1522 
   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk  3243 
   Financial Statements and Supplementary Data  3345 
   Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure  6887 
   Controls and Procedures  6887 
   Other Information  6990 
 
   Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance  6990 
   Executive Compensation  6990 
   Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters  7090 
   Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence  7091 
   Principal Accounting Fees and Services  7091 
 
   Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules  7192 
  7395 
 Summary of Non-Employee Director Meeting Fees and CompensationEX-3(i)(a)
 Amended Executive Benefit PlanEX-3(i)(b)
 Summary of Executive Officer CompensationEX-10.7
 Summary of Dennis Benning Post Retirement Relocation AgreementEX-10.16
 SubsidiariesEX-10.18
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmEX-10.19
 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Thomas A. GendronEX-21
 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Robert F. Weber, Jr.EX-23(i)
 Section 1350 CertificationsEX-23(ii)
EX-31(i)
EX-31(ii)
EX-32(i)


1


 
PART I
Forward Looking Statement
 
This Annual Report onForm 10-K, including “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” contains forward-looking statements regarding future events and our future results within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that are deemed forward-looking statements. These statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts, and projections about the industries in which we operate and the beliefs and assumptions of management. Words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “seek,” “goal,” “expect,” “forecasts,” “intend,” “continue,” “outlook,” “plan,” “project,” “target,” “can,” “could,” “may,” “should,” “will,” “would,” variations of such words, and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements that refer to projections of our future financial performance, our anticipated growth and trends in our businesses, and other characteristics of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are only predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are difficult to predict, including those identified below, under “Item 1A. Risk Factors,” and elsewhere herein. Therefore, actual results could differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements for any reason. Forward-looking statements may include, among others, statements relating to:
 
 • Future sales, earnings, cash flow, uses of cash, and other measures of financial performanceperformance;
 
 • Description of our plans and obligationsexpectations for future operationsoperations;
 
 • The effect of economic downturns or growth in particular regionsregions;
 
 • The effect of changes in the level of activity in particular industries or marketsmarkets;
 
 • The availability and cost of materials, components, services, and suppliessupplies;
 
 • The scope, nature, or impact of acquisition activity and integration into our businessesbusinesses;
 
 • The development, production, and support of advanced technologies and new products and servicesservices;
 
 • New business opportunitiesopportunities;
• Restructuring costs and savings;
 
 • The outcome of contingenciescontingencies;
 
 • Future repurchases of common stockstock;
 
 • Future levels of indebtedness and capital spendingspending; and
 
 • Pension plan assumptions and future contributionscontributions.
 
Item 1.Business
General
Woodward Governor Company (“Woodward” or the “Company”) is one of the largest independent designers, manufacturers, and service providers of energy control and optimization solutions for reciprocating engine, aircraft and industrial turbines, and electrical power system equipment. Leading original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) throughout the world use our products and services in the power generation, power distribution, aerospace, transportation, and process industries markets.
We were established in 1870 and incorporated in 1902. We serve global markets from locations worldwideReaders are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are only predictions and are headquartered in Fort Collins, Colorado. The mailing address of our headquarters is 1000 East Drake Road, Fort Collins, Colorado 80525,subject to risks, uncertainties, and our telephone number at that location is(970) 482-5811. Our Website is www.woodward.com.
Products and Services
Worldwide demand for fuel-efficient, low emission, high-performance energy systems drives our business. We integrate our technologies into fuel, combustion, fluid, actuation, and electronic control systems for OEMs and


2


equipment packagers. Our customers use Woodward systems and components for controlling engines, turbines, and associated equipment in power generation, power distribution, transportation, process industries, and aerospace markets.
Energy control technology and optimization solutions are our strength. We are focused on accurately and precisely controlling energy by integrating our components into systems that improve the emissions performance, reliability, and fuel efficiency of our customers’ products, helping ensure a better environment.
To penetrate our markets, our strategy focuses on maintaining and developing expertise in technologiesassumptions that are used in the development of components and integrated systems for power equipment used by customers worldwide.difficult to predict, including:
 
 • Strategic Focus: Energy Control and Optimization Solutions.  Our key areas of focus are fluid energy, combustion control, electrical energy, and motion control.A decline in business with our significant customers;
 
 • Leverage: Core Technologies.Our core technologies include valves, servo actuators, combustion sensing, digital electronics, fuel injection, electric actuation, ignition, power electronics, pumps,ability to forecast future sales and alternating current measurement and control.earnings;
 
 • Integrate: Systems.  Our systems include fuel systems, combustion systems, fluid systems, actuation systems,The recent instability of the credit markets and electronic systems.other adverse economic and industry conditions;
 
 • Apply: OEM and Equipment Packagers.  Our OEM and equipment packager customers useFines or sanctions resulting from the outcome of the investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) regarding certain pricing practices of MPC Products Corporation, one of our systems and components in their products, including diesel engines, turbines, gas engines, compressors, generator sets, switchgears, and industrial vehicles.wholly-owned subsidiaries prior to 2006;
 
 • Serve: Market Applications.  Ultimately,Our ability to successfully manage competitive factors, including prices, promotional incentives, industry consolidation, and commodity and other input cost increases;
• Our ability to reduce our systemsexpenses in proportion to any sales shortfalls;
• The ability of our suppliers to provide us with materials of sufficient quality or quantity required to meet our production needs at favorable prices or at all;
• The success of or expenses associated with our product development activities;


2


• Our ability to integrate acquisitions and components are usedcosts related thereto;
• Our ability to operate our business and pursue business strategies in products that are sold into four key markets — electric power, transportation, process industries,the light of certain restrictive covenants in our outstanding debt documents;
• Future impairment charges resulting from changes in the estimates of fair value of reporting units or of long-lived assets;
• Changes in domestic or international tax statutes and aerospace.future subsidiary results;
• Environmental liabilities related to manufacturing activities;
• Our continued access to a stable workforce and favorable labor relations with our employees;
• Our ability to successfully manage regulatory, tax and legal matters (including product liability, patent and intellectual property matters);and
• Risks from operating internationally, including the impact on reported earnings from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.
These factors are representative of the risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from what is expressed or forecast in our forward-looking statements. Other factors are discussed under “Risk Factors” in our SEC filings are incorporated by reference.
Therefore, actual results could differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. For additional information regarding factors that may affect our actual financial condition and results of operations, see the information under the caption “Item 1A. Risk Factors” beginning on page 8 of this Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements for any reason.
Item 1.  Business
General
Woodward Governor Company (“Woodward,” the “Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us”) designs, manufactures, and services energy control systems and components for commercial and military aircraft, turbines, reciprocating engines, and electrical power system equipment. Our innovative fluid energy, combustion control, electrical energy, and motion control systems help customers offer cleaner, more reliable, and more cost-effective equipment. Leading original equipment manufacturers use our products and services in aerospace, power and process industries, and transportation.
Our strategic focus is Energy Control and Optimization Solutions. The control of energy — fluid energy, combustion, electrical energy, and motion — is a growing requirement in the markets we serve. Our customers look to us to optimize the efficiency, emissions, and operations of power equipment. Our core technologies leverage well across our markets and customer applications, enabling us to develop and integrate cost-effective and state-of-the-art fuel, combustion, fluid, actuation, and electronic systems. We focus primarily on OEMs and equipment packagers, partnering with them to bring superior component and system solutions to their demanding applications.
Woodward is headquartered in Fort Collins, Colorado, and serves global markets from locations worldwide. The mailing address for our headquarters is 1000 East Drake Road, Fort Collins, Colorado 80525. Our telephone at that location is(970) 482-5811, and our website iswww.woodward.com.
Products and Services
Woodward strives to be the undisputed leader in the aerospace, power and process industries, and transportation markets that we serve. We help meet global needs for reliable, efficient, low-emission, and high-performance energy for diverse applications in challenging environments.
We remain focused on Energy Control and Optimization Solutions for aerospace, power and process industries, and transportation markets that we serve. We design systems that manage the energy of fluid movement,


3


motion, and electricity. We also convert wind energy into reliable and safe electrical power through inverter systems.
 
We believe all of our business segments have a significant competitive position within their markets for components and integrated systems. We compete with several other manufacturers, including the in-house operations of certain OEMs. While published information is not available in sufficient detail to enable an accurate assessment, we do notoriginal equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”). We believe any company holds a dominant competitive position. Companies compete principally on technology, price, quality, and customer service. In our opinion, our prices, are competitive, and our technology, quality, and customer service are favorable competitive factors.highly competitive.
 
Principal Lines of Business
 
BeginningWoodward operates in the fourth quarter of 2007, we realigned our operations into the following threefour business segments in order to better align our operations with the evolving nature of our customers and markets:segments:
 
 • Turbine Systemscombines the former Aircraft Engine Systems business segment with the industrial gas turbine and process industries businesses previously included in the Industrial Controls business segment. Turbine Systems is focused on developing and manufacturing systems and components that provide energy control and optimization solutions for the aircraft and industrial gas turbine markets.
 
 • Engine Systemswas formerly part of the Industrial Controls business segment. Engine Systems is focused on developing and manufacturing systems and components that provide energy control and optimization solutions for the industrial engine and steam turbine markets, which include power generation, transportation, and process industries.
 
 • Electrical Power Systemswas formerly part of the Industrial Controls business segment. Electrical Power Systems is focused on developing and manufacturing systems and components that provide power sensing and energy control systems that improve the security, quality, reliability, and availability of electrical power networks for industrial markets, which include power generation, power distribution, transportation, and process industries.
• Airframe Systemswas added October 1, 2008 upon Woodward’s acquisition of all of the outstanding shares of stock of Techni-Core, Inc. (“Techni-Core”) and all of the outstanding shares of stock of MPC Products Corporation (“MPC Products” and, together with Techni-Core, “MPC”). MPC is the leader in the manufacture of high-performance electromechanical motion control systems primarily for aerospace applications. Their core competencies in sensing, motors, actuation systems, and electronics will also be applied to Woodward’s aircraft turbine market, industrial turbine market, as well as other industrial markets.
All segment information for the quarters ended December 31, 2006, March 31, 2007, and June 30, 2007 and the years ended September 30, 2005 and 2006 has been restated to reflect the realigned segment structure.
 
Information about our operations in 20072008 and outlook for the future, including certain segment information, is included in “Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Additional segment information and certain geographical information are included in the NotesNote 20 to the Consolidated


3


Financial Statements in “Item 8 — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” Additional information about Airframe Systems and the acquisition is included in Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8 — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” Other information about our business follows.
 
Turbine Systems
 
We provide integrated control systems and control components such as electronics, actuators, valves, fuel systems, and combustion systems through the Turbine Systems groupsegment to OEMs ofthat manufacture gas turbines for use in aerospace and industrial power markets. We also sell components as spares or replacements and provide repair and overhaul services to these customers and other customers.
In 2007, customers exceeding 10% of sales in this segment were General Electric Company, United Technologies/Pratt & Whitney and the U.S. government, which accounted for approximately 36%, 14% and 12% of Turbine Systems’ sales, respectively.
 
We primarily sell Turbine Systems’ products and services directly to our customers,manufacturers, although we also generate some aftermarket sales through distributors, dealers, and independent service facilities.
In fiscal 2008, customers exceeding 10% of net external sales in the Turbine Systems segment were General Electric Company (approximately 35%), United Technologies (approximately 16%), and the U.S. government (approximately 10%).
 
Engine Systems
 
We provide integrated control systems and control components, such as electronics, actuators, valves, fuel systemspumps, injectors, and combustionignition systems through the Engine Systems groupsegment primarily to OEMs ofthat manufacture diesel engines, gas engines, steam turbines, and distributors for use in power generation, marine, transportation, and


4


process applications. We also sell components as spares or replacements and provide repair and overhaul services to OEM customers and equipment operators.
In 2007, one customer exceeded 10% of sales in this segment. Caterpillar accounted for approximately 25% of Engine Systems’ sales.
 
We primarily sell Engine Systems’ products and services directly to our OEM customers. We also sell through our global channel partners (distributors, dealers, and independent service facilities) to support our OEMs’ customers and end users.
 
In fiscal 2008, Caterpillar exceeded 10% of net external sales in the Engine Systems segment, accounting for approximately 26% of Engine Systems’ net external sales.
Electrical Power Systems
 
We provide integrated control systems and electronic control and protection modules through the Electrical Power Systems groupsegment primarily to OEMs ofthat manufacture electrical power generation, distribution, conversion (predominantly wind power), and grid related quality equipment using digital controls and inverter technologies. Sales are made primarily to OEMs ofthat manufacture generator sets, wind turbine,turbines, and switchgear equipment. We also sell components as spares or replacements, and provide other related services to these customersOEM and other customers.
In 2007, We also provide repair and overhaul services to OEM customers exceeding 10%and equipment operators as part of sales in this segment were Repower Systems AG and Ecotecnia, which accounted for approximately 17% and 10%the wind power side of Electrical Power Systems’ sales, respectively.our business.
 
We generally sell Electrical Power Systems’ products and services directly to our OEM customers, although we also generate sales to end users through distributors. Our customers demand technological solutions to meet their needs for security, quality, reliability, and availability of electrical power networks.
 
In fiscal 2008, customers exceeding 10% of net external sales in the Electrical Power Systems segment were REpower Systems AG (approximately 24%), Caterpillar (approximately 12%), and Ecotècnia (approximately 10%).
Airframe Systems
On October 1, 2008, we added a fourth business segment, Airframe Systems, upon the acquisition of MPC. Airframe Systems provides high-performance electromechanical motion control systems, including sensors, primarily for aerospace applications. The primary product lines include high performance electric motors and sensors, analog and digital control electronics, rotary and linear actuation systems, and flight deck andfly-by-wire systems for commercial and military aerospace programs. Sales are made primarily OEMs and to tier-one prime contractors. Additional information about Airframe Systems and the acquisition is included in Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8 — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
Customers
 
Some of ourOur customers include Caterpillar, Ecotecnia,Ecotècnia, General Electric, RepowerREpower Systems AG, Rolls Royce, the U.S. government, and United Technologies/Pratt & Whitney.Technologies.
 
Two customers individually accounted for more than 10% of consolidated net sales in each of the years 2005 through 2007.ended September 30, 2008, 2007, and 2006. Sales to General Electric were made by all of our segments and totaled approximately 17% in fiscal 2008, approximately 20%, 22%, in fiscal 2007, and 23% of sales during the years ended September 30, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.approximately 22% in fiscal 2006. Sales to Caterpillar were made by all of our segments and net sales totaled approximately 10%, in fiscal 2008, approximately 10% in fiscal 2007, and approximately 11%, and 13% of sales during the years ended September 30, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. in fiscal 2006.


45


Backlog
 
Our backlog as of September 30October 31, 2008 and 2007 by segment was as follows (in thousands):
 
                            
   % Expected to
   % Expected to
    % Expected to
   
   be Filled by
   be Filled by
    be Filled by
   
 September 30,
 September 30,
 September 30,
 September 30,
  October 31,
 September 30,
 October 31,
 
 2007 2008 2006 2007  2008 2009 2007 
Turbine Systems $331,024   68% $251,942   95% $165,413   82% $150,000 
Engine Systems  99,812   96   86,462   100   107,953   92   103,895 
Electrical Power Systems  95,548   73   8,487   100   100,856   55   104,063 
Airframe Systems  1,789   52   N/A 
          
 $526,384   74  $346,891   96  $376,011   77% $357,958 
          
 
Turbine System’s backlog at October 31, 2007 is estimated. In previous years, our disclosure of Turbine Systems’ reported backlog included forecasts of certain sales associated with customer agreements in addition to firm sales orders. Our current estimate of the backlog is based on typically assumed relationships between the timing of firm orders and subsequent sales. Backlog orders are not necessarily an indicator of future billingsales levels because of variations in lead times and customer production demand pull systems.
 
Seasonality
 
We do not believe sales are subject to significant seasonal variation.
 
Government Contracts and Regulation
Our businesses are heavily regulated in many of our fields of endeavor. We deal with numerous U.S. government agencies and entities, including all of the branches of the U.S. military, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (“NASA”), and the Departments of Defense, Homeland Security, and Transportation. Similar government authorities exist with respect to our international efforts.
The U.S. government, and other governments, may terminate any of our government contracts (and, in general, subcontracts) at their convenience, as well as for default based on specified performance measurements. If any of our government contracts were to be terminated for convenience, we generally would be entitled to receive payment for work completed and allowable termination or cancellation costs. If any of our government contracts were to be terminated for default, the U.S. government generally would pay only for the work accepted, and could require us to pay the difference between the original contract price and the cost to re-procure the contract items, net of the work accepted from the original contract. The U.S. government could also hold us liable for damages resulting from the default.
We must comply with, and are affected by, laws and regulations relating to the formation, administration, and performance of U.S. government contracts. These laws and regulations, among other things:
• require certification and disclosure of all cost or pricing data in connection with certain contract negotiations;
• impose specific and unique cost accounting practices that may differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“U.S. GAAP”) and therefore require reconciliation;
• impose acquisition regulations that define allowable and unallowable costs and otherwise govern our right to reimbursement under certain cost-based U.S. government contracts; and
• restrict the use and dissemination of information classified for national security purposes and the export of certain products and technical data.
Research and Development
 
We spent, across our segments, approximately $65 million for company-sponsoredconduct research and development activities under customer-funded contracts and with our own independent research and development funds. Our research and development costs include basic research, applied


6


research, development, systems and other concept formulation studies, and bid and proposal efforts related to government products and services. Costs related to customer-funded contracts are generally allocated among all contracts and programs in 2007, $60progress based on the contractual arrangements. Company-sponsored product development costs not otherwise allocable are charged to expenses when incurred. Under certain arrangements in which a customer shares in product development costs, our portion of the unreimbursed costs is generally expensed as incurred. Across all our segments, total research and development costs, including costs related to bid and proposal efforts, totaled $73.4 million in 2006, and $50fiscal 2008, $65.3 million in 2005.fiscal 2007, and $60.0 million in fiscal 2006. See “Research and development costs” in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8 — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
 
Manufacturing
 
For our segments, our products consist of mechanical, electronic, and electromagnetic components. Mechanical components are machined primarily from aluminum, iron, and steel. Generally there are numerous sources for the raw materials and components used in our products, and they are believed to be sufficiently available to meet expected requirements. We carry certain finished goods and component parts inventory to meet rapid delivery requirements of customers, primarily for aftermarket needs.
 
Employees
 
As of September 30, 2007,October 31, 2008, we employed 4,2485,823 full-time personsemployees of whom 1,464which 1,626 were located outside of the U.S. We consider the relationships with our employees to be positive.
 
Approximately 1,285 joined Woodward in connection with the acquisition of MPC and 75 employees in connection with the acquisition of MotoTron Corporation (“MotoTron”) in October 2008. Additional information about our acquisitions is included in Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8 — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
In the U.S., as of October 31, 2008, all of our employees are at-will employees, except certain MPC employees who are not executive officers of Woodward and therefore,either had pre-existing employment agreements with MPC prior to the MPC acquisition or were members of the MPC Employees Representative Union. Our at-will employees are not subject to any type of employment contract or agreement. Our President and Chief Executive Officer and President and our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer each hashave a Change in Control Transition Agreement.
 
Outside of the U.S., the Company enterswe enter into employment contracts and agreements in those countries in which such relationships are mandatory or customary. The provisions of these agreements correspond in each case with the required or customary terms in the subject jurisdiction.
 
Patents, Intellectual Property, and Licensing
 
Products for our segments make use of several patents and trademarks of various durations that we believe are collectively important. However, we do not consider any one patent or trademark material to our business.
 
Executive Officers of the Registrant
 
Set forth below is certain information with respect to the current executive officers. There are no family relationships between any of the executive officers listed below.
 
Thomas A. Gendron, Age 46. President,47.  Chairman of the Board since January 2008; Chief Executive Officer, President, and Director since July 2005; President and Chief Operating Officer and President from September 2002 through June 2005; Vice President and General Manager of Industrial


5


Controls June 2001 through September 2002; Vice President of Industrial Controls April 2000 through May 2001; Director of Global Marketing and Industrial Controls’ Business Development February 1999 through March 2000.
 
Robert F. Weber, Jr., Age 52.54.  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since August 2005. Prior to August 2005, Mr. Weber was employed at Motorola, Inc. for 17 years, where he held various positions, including Corporate


7


Vice President and General Manager — EMEA Auto. Prior to this role, Mr. Weber served in a variety of financial positions at both a corporate and operating unit level.level with Motorola.
 
Martin V. Glass, Age 50.51.  Group Vice President, Turbine Systems since September 2007; Vice President of the Aircraft Engine Systems Customer Business Segment December 2002 through August 2007; Director of Sales, Marketing, and Engineering February 2000 through December 2002.
 
Dennis Benning, Age 66.67.  Group Vice President, Airframe Systems since October 2008; Group Vice President, Engine Systems since September 2007;2007 through September 2008; Vice President, Center of Excellence Industrial Controls December 2002 through August 2007; General Manager, Center of Excellence Industrial Controls July 2002 through November 2002; Director of Operations, Aircraft Engine Systems January 2002 through June 2002.
 
Gerhard Lauffer, Age 46.47.  Group Vice President, Electrical Power Systems since September 2007.2007; Vice President and General Manager Electronic Controls March 2002 through August 2007.2007; Managing Director Leonhard-Reglerbau GmbH 1991 through March 2002.2002 when it was acquired by Woodward.
Chad Preiss, Age 43.  Group Vice President, Engine Systems since October 2008; Vice President, Sales, Service, and Marketing, Engine Systems December 2007 through September 2008; and Vice President, Industrial Controls September 2004 through December 2007. Prior to this role, Mr. Preiss served in a variety of engineering and marketing/sales management roles, including Director of Business Development, since joining Woodward in 1988.
 
A. Christopher Fawzy, Age 38.39.  Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since June 2007. Prior to joining Woodward, Mr. Fawzy was employed by Mentor Corporation, a global medical device company. He joined Mentor in 2001 and served as Corporate Counsel, then General Counsel in 2003, and was appointed Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary in 2004.
 
Information available on Woodward’s Website
 
Through a link on the Investor Information section of our Website, we make available the following filings as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”): our Annual Report onForm 10-K, Quarterly Reports onForm 10-Q, Current Reports onForm 8-K, Proxy Statements, and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. ShareholdersStockholders may obtain, without charge, a single copy of Woodward’s 20072008 Annual Report onForm 10-K upon written request to the Corporate Secretary, Woodward Governor Company, 1000 East Drake Road, Fort Collins, Colorado 80525.


8


Item 1A.  Risk Factors
 
Investment in our securities involves risk. An investor or potential investor should consider the risks summarized in this section when making investment decisions regarding our securities.
 
Important factors that could individually, or together with one or more other factors, affect our business, results of operations, financial condition,and/or financial conditioncash flows include, but are not limited to, the following:
 
Company Risks
 
Customers that account forA decline in business with our significant customers could decrease our consolidated net sales and have a significant portionmaterial adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of our sales may change suppliers, in-source production, or be less successful in the marketplace.operations, and cash flows.
 
We have fewer customers than many other companies with similar sales volumes. For the year ended September 30, 2008, approximately 43% of our consolidated net sales were made to our five largest customers. Sales to our five largest customers represented approximately 47% of our consolidated net sales for the year ended September 30, 2007. Two of those customers individually accounted for more than 10% of consolidated net sales in each of the years 2005 through 2007. Salesended September 30, 2008, 2007, and 2006. Turbine Systems, Engine Systems, and Electrical Power Systems made sales to General Electric were made by allCompany, and those sales totaled approximately 17% in fiscal 2008, approximately 20% in fiscal 2007, and approximately 22% in fiscal 2006 of our segmentsconsolidated net sales. Turbine Systems, Engine Systems, and Electrical Power Systems also made sales to Caterpillar Inc. and those sales totaled approximately 20%, 22%,10% in fiscal 2008, approximately 10% in fiscal 2007, and 23% of sales during the years ended September 30, 2007,approximately 11% in fiscal 2006 and 2005, respectively. Sales to Caterpillar were made by all of our segments and totaled approximately 10%, 11%, and 13%consolidated net sales. If any of sales during the years ended September 30, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. Our sales could decrease significantly if a large customerour significant customers were to change suppliers, in-source production, or be less successfulexperience difficulties in the markets in which it participates.they participate, or otherwise reduce purchases from us, our consolidated net sales could decrease significantly, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.


6


Sales may not achieve the level forecast.Our future sales and earnings could vary materially from our projections.
 
We use inputs from various sources in developing ourOur sales forecast is based on management’s best estimate of various factors and information deemed relevant, including, among others, customer and third-party forecasts of sales volumes and purchase requirements in our markets. Each of these sourcesfactors is subjective and could be overstated. In addition, general business and economic conditions and industry-specific business and economic conditions, changeincluding a continuation of the current economic slowdown or further deterioration of economic conditions in the U.S. and internationally, could result in sales that are lower than forecast. Accordingly, our ability to forecast the timing and amount of specific sales is limited, and our future sales and earnings could vary materially from our projections. The difficulty in forecasting demand increases the challenge in anticipating our inventory requirements, which may cause us to over-produce finished goods and could result in inventory write-offs, or could cause us to under-produce finished goods. Any such over-production or under-production could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
The recent instability of the financial markets and adverse economic conditions could have a material adverse effect on the ability of our customers to perform their obligations to us and on demand for our products and services.
Recently, there has been widespread concern over time, potentially resultingthe instability of the financial markets and their influence on the global economy. As a result of the credit market crisis and other economic challenges currently affecting the global economy, our current or potential future customers may experience serious cash flow problems and as a result, may modify, delay, or cancel plans to purchase our products. Additionally, if customers are not successful in lower sales.generating sufficient revenue or are precluded from securing financing, they may not be able to pay, or may delay payment of, accounts receivable that are owed to us. Any inability of currentand/or potential customers to pay us for our products may adversely affect our earnings and cash flows.
In addition, demand for our products and services is significantly affected by the general economic environment. During periods of slowing economic activity, such as the recent tightening of the credit markets, a global slowdown in spending on infrastructure development may occur in the markets in which we operate, and customers


9


may reduce their purchases of our products and services. As a result, any significant economic downturn, including the current economic downturn and the adverse conditions in the credit markets, could have a material adverse effect on customer demand.
There can be no assurance that the current economic slowdown or further deterioration of economic conditions in the U.S. as well as internationally will not have a material adverse effect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
If funding is not available to us when needed, or is available only on unfavorable terms, we may be unable to implement our business plans, complete acquisitions, or otherwise take advantage of business opportunities or respond to competitive pressures.
Global financial markets and economic conditions have been, and continue to be, disrupted and volatile. The debt and equity capital markets have been distressed. These issues, along with significant write-offs in the financial services sector, the repricing of credit risk, and the current weak economic conditions have made, and will likely continue to make, it difficult to obtain funding. In addition, as a result of concerns about the stability of financial markets generally and the solvency of counterparties specifically, the cost of obtaining money from the credit markets has generally increased as many lenders and institutional investors have increased interest rates, enacted tighter lending standards, refused to refinance existing debt at maturity either at all or on terms similar to our current debt and reduced and, in some cases, ceased to provide funding to borrowers. Due to these factors, we cannot be certain that funding will be available if needed and to the extent required, on acceptable terms. If funding is not available when needed, or is available only on unfavorable terms, we may be unable to implement our business plans, complete acquisitions, or otherwise take advantage of business opportunities or respond to competitive pressures, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
 
Many of our expenses may not be able to be reduced in proportion to a sales shortfall.
 
ManySome of our expenses are relatively fixed in relation to changes in sales volumes.volumes and are difficult to adjust in the short term. Some of these expenses are related to past capital expenditures or business acquisitions in the form of depreciation and amortization expense. Others are related to expenditures driven by levels of business activity other than the level of sales, including manufacturing overhead. As a result, we might be unable to reduce spending quickly enoughexpenses in a timely manner to compensate for a reduction in sales, which would adversely affectcould have a material adverse effect on our earnings.business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
 
Suppliers may be unable to provide us with materials of sufficient quality or quantity required to meet our production needs at favorable prices or at favorable prices.all.
 
We are dependent upon suppliers for parts and raw materials used in the manufacture of components that we sell to our customers. We may experience an increase in costs for parts or materials that we source from our suppliers, or we may experience a shortage of materials for various reasons, such as the loss of a significant supplier, high overall demand creating shortages in parts and supplies we use, or financial distress, work stoppages, natural disasters, or production difficulties that may affect one or more of our suppliers. Our customers rely on us to provide on-time delivery and have certain rights if our delivery standards are not maintained. A significant increase in our supply costs, or a protracted interruption of supplies for any reason, may adversely affectcould result in the delay of one or more of our customer contracts or could damage our reputation and relationships with customers. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.operations, and cash flows.
 
ProductSubcontractors may fail to perform contractual obligations.
We frequently subcontract portions of work due under contracts with our customers and are dependent on the continued availability and satisfactory performance by these subcontractors. Nonperformance or underperformance by subcontractors may materially impact our ability to perform obligations to our customers. A subcontractor’s failure to perform could result in a customer terminating our contract for default, expose us to liability, and substantially impair our ability to compete for future contracts and orders, and we may not be able to enforce fully


10


all of our rights under these agreements, including any rights to indemnification. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
Our product development activities may not be successful or may be more costly than currently anticipated.
 
Our business involves a significant level of product development activities, generally in connection with our customers’ own development activities. Industry standards, customer expectations, or other products may emerge that could render one or more of our products or services less desirable or obsolete. Maintaining our market position will require continued investment in research and development. During an economic downturn, including the current one, we may need to maintain our investment in research and development, which may limit our ability to reduce these expenses in proportion to a sales shortfall. If these activities are not as successful as currently anticipated, or if they are more costly than currently anticipated, future salesand/or earnings could be lower.lower than expected, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
 
Activities necessary to integrate an acquisitionacquisitions may result in costs in excess of current expectations or be less successful than anticipated.
 
We completed atwo business acquisitionacquisitions in October 20062008, and we may acquire other businesses in the future. The success of these transactions will depend, among other things, on our ability to integrate assets and personnel acquired in these transactions and to apply our internal controls processes to these acquired businesses. The integration of these acquisitions may require significant attention from our management, and the diversion of management’s attention and resources could have a material adverse effect on our ability to manage our business. Furthermore, we may not realize the degree or timing of benefits we anticipate when we first enter into a transaction. If actual integration costs are higher than amounts assumed or we are unable to integrate the assets and personnel acquired in an acquisition as anticipated, or if we are unable to fully benefit from anticipated synergies, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.
Certain restrictive covenants limit our ability to operate our business and to pursue our business strategies, and if we fail to comply with these covenants, it could result in an acceleration of payments for our outstanding indebtedness.
Our existing term loan credit agreement, revolving credit agreement, and note purchase agreements governing our outstanding senior notes contain covenants that limit or restrict our ability to finance future earningsoperations or capital needs, to respond to changing business and economic conditions, or to engage in other transactions or business activities that may impact our growth or otherwise be important to us. These agreements limit or restrict, among other things, our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to:
• incur additional indebtedness;
• pay dividends or make distributions on our capital stock or certain other restricted payments or investments;
• purchase or redeem stock;
• issue stock of our subsidiaries;
• make investments and extend credit;
• engage in transactions with affiliates;
• transfer and sell assets;
• effect a consolidation or merger or sell, transfer, lease, or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets; and
• create liens on our assets to secure debt.


11


The agreements also impose financial covenants on us and our subsidiaries that require us to maintain certain leverage ratios and minimum levels of consolidated net worth. In addition, certain of these agreements require us to repay outstanding borrowings with portions of the proceeds we receive from certain sales of property or assets and specified future debt offerings. Our ability to comply with these provisions may be lower than anticipated.affected by events beyond our control.
Any breach of these covenants could cause a default under these agreements and other debt, which could restrict our ability to borrow under the revolving credit agreement. If there were an event of default under certain provisions of our debt instruments that was not cured or waived, the holders of the defaulted debt would be able to cause all amounts outstanding with respect to the debt instrument to be due and payable immediately. Our assets and cash flow may not be sufficient to fully repay borrowings under our outstanding debt instruments if accelerated upon an event of default. If we are unable to repay, refinance, or restructure our indebtedness as required, or amend the covenants contained in these agreements, the lenders or noteholders may be entitled to institute foreclosure proceedings against our assets. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
 
Changes in the estimates of fair value of reporting units or of long-lived assets may result in future impairment charges.charges, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
 
Over time, the fair values of long-lived assets change. We test goodwill for impairment at least annually, and more often if circumstances require. Future goodwill impairment charges may occur if estimates of fair values decrease, which would reduce future earnings. We also test property, plant, and equipment and other intangibles for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Future asset impairment charges may occur if estimatesasset utilization declines, if customer demand decreases, or for a number of fair values decrease,other reasons, which would reduce future earnings. Any such impairment charges could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
 
Future subsidiary results or changes in domestic or international tax statutes may change the amount of valuation allowances provided for deferred income tax assets.
 
We establish valuation allowances to reflect the estimated amount of deferred tax assets that might not be realized. The underlying analysis is performed for individual tax jurisdictions, generally at a subsidiary level. Future subsidiary results, actual or forecasted, as well as changes to the relevant tax statutes, could change the outcome of our analysis and change the amount of valuation allowances provided for deferred income tax assets.assets, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.


7


Manufacturing activities may result in future environmental liabilities.
 
We use hazardous materialsand/or regulated materials in our manufacturing operations. We also own and may acquire facilities that were formerly owned and operated by others that used hazardoussuch materials. The risk that a significant release of hazardousregulated materials has occurred in the past or will occur in the future cannot be completely eliminated.eliminated or prevented. As a result, we are subject to a substantial number of costly regulations. In particular, we are required to comply with increasingly stringent requirements of federal, state, and local environmental, occupational health and safety laws and regulations in the U.S., the European Union, and other territories, including those governing emissions to air, discharges to water, noise and odor emissions, the generation, handling, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of waste materials, and the cleanup of contaminated properties and human health and safety. Compliance with these laws and regulations results in ongoing costs. We cannot be certain that we have been, or will at all times be, in complete compliance with all environmental requirements, or that we will not incur additional material costs or liabilities in connection with these requirements. As a result, we may incur material costs or liabilities or be required to need to undertake future environmental remediation activities that would negatively affectcould have a material adverse effect on our future earningsbusiness, financial condition, results of operations, and financial position.cash flows.


12


Our performance depends on continued access to a stable workforce and on favorable labor relations with our employees.
 
Competition for technical personnel in the industry in which we compete is intense. Our future success depends in part on our continued ability to hire, train, assimilate, and retain qualified personnel. There is no assurance that we will continue to be successful in recruiting qualified employees in the future. In addition, labor unrest at a customer facility can cause a reduction in demand or a deferral of orders. Any significant increases in labor costs, deterioration of employee relations, slowdowns or work stoppages at any of our locations, whether due to employee turnover, changes in availability of qualified technical personnel, or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our business, our relationships with customers, and our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
 
Our intellectual property rights may not be sufficient to protect all our products or technologies.
 
Our success depends in part on our ability to obtain patents or rights to patents, protect trade secrets, operate without infringing upon the proprietary rights of others, and prevent others from infringing on our patents, trademarks, and other intellectual property rights. We will be able to protect our intellectual property from unauthorized use by third parties only to the extent that it is covered by valid and enforceable patents, trademarks, or licenses. Patent protection generally involves complex legal and factual questions and, therefore, enforceability of patent rights cannot be predicted with certainty; thus, any patents that we own or license from others may not provide us with adequate protection against competitors. Moreover, the laws of certain foreign countries do not recognize intellectual property rights or protect them to the same extent as do the laws of the United States.U.S. If we infringe on the proprietary rights of others or if we are unable to sufficiently protect our proprietary rights, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.
 
If third parties claim we are infringing their intellectual property rights, we could sufferface significant litigation, indemnification, or licensing expenses or be prevented from marketing our products.
 
Our commercial success depends significantly on our ability to operate without infringing the patents and other proprietary rights of others. However, regardless of our intent, our current or future technologies may infringe upon the patents or violate other proprietary rights of third parties. In the event of such infringement or violation, we may face expensive litigation or indemnification obligations and may be prevented from selling existing products and pursuing product development or commercialization.commercialization, which could have an adverse affect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
 
Product liability claims, product recalls or other liabilities associated with the products and services we provide may force us to pay substantial damage awards and other expenses that could exceed our accruals and insurance coverages.coverage.
 
The manufacture and sale of our products and the services we provide expose us to risk of product liability and other tort claims. Both currently and in the past, we have had a number of product liability claims relating to our products, and we will likely be subject to additional product liability claims in the future for both past and current products, some of which may have a negative impactmaterial adverse effect on our business.business, financial condition, and results of operations. We also provide certain services to our customers. As a result, wecustomers and are subject to claims with respect to the services provided. In providing such services, we may rely on subcontractors to perform all or a portion of the contracted services. It is possible that we could be liable to our customers for work performed by a subcontractor. While we believe that we have appropriate insurance coverage available to us related to any such claims, our insurance may not cover all liabilities or be available in the future at a cost acceptable to us. If a product liability or other claim or series of claims, including class action claims, is brought against us for uninsured liabilities that are not covered by insurance or in excess of our insurance coverage or accruals, our business could suffer andfor which third-party indemnification is not available, such claim could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or financial condition.and cash flows.


813


Fines or sanctions resulting from the investigation by the DOJ regarding MPC pricing policies could have a material adverse effect on Woodward.
MPC, one of our newly acquired subsidiaries, is subject to an investigation by the DOJ regarding certain of its pricing practices prior to 2006 related to government contracts. MPC and the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois have reached a settlement in principle and are in the process of finalizing and obtaining approvals within the DOJ. Final disposition will be subject to acceptance and approval by the U.S. District Court. It is anticipated that any settlement of the matter would involve the payment of monetary fines and other amounts by MPC. MPC is also in the process of working with the U.S. Department of Defense to resolve any administrative matters that may arise out of the investigation. There can be no assurance as to the resolution of these matters. The purchase price for MPC reflects the amount agreed to in principle by MPC with the U.S. Attorney. Any resulting fines or other sanctions beyond this amount could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
Amounts accrued for contingencies may be inadequate to cover the amount of loss when the matters are ultimately resolved.
 
In addition to intellectual property and product liability matters, we are currently involved or may become involved in pending or threatened litigation or other legal proceedings regarding employment andor other contractual matters arising fromin the normalordinary course of business. We accrue for known individual matters that we believe are likely to result in a loss when ultimately resolved using estimates of the most likely amount of loss. There may be additional losses that have not been accrued, that would reduce future earnings.which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
 
Changes in the legal environment in which we operate may affect future sales and expenses.
 
We operate in a number of countries and are affected by a variety of laws and regulations, including foreign investment, employment, import, export, business acquisitions, environmental and taxation matters, among others. Unexpectedland use rights, property, and other matters. Our ability to operate in these countries may be materially adversely affected by unexpected changes in the legal environment may result in lower sales or increased expenses in the future.such laws and regulations.
 
Operations and suppliers outside the United States may be subject to additional risks.physical and other risks that could disrupt production.
 
Our operations include principal plants include facilities in China, Germany, Scotland, and Germany,Poland as well as the U.S. In addition, we operate sales and service facilities in Brazil, India, Japan, the Netherlands, and the United States.Kingdom. We also have suppliers for materials and parts inside and outside the United States. TheU.S. Our operations and sources of supply outside the United States could be disrupted by a natural disaster, war, political unrest, terrorist activity, public health concerns, or other unforeseen events, that would be less likely to occurwhich could cause significant delays in the United States. Disruptionshipment of an overseas operationproducts and the provision of services and could cause the loss of sales and customers. Accordingly, disruption of our operations or the operations of a significant supplier could adversely affecthave a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.operations, and cash flows.
 
ChangesWe have significant investments in foreign entities and have significant sales and purchases in foreign denominated currencies creating exposure to foreign currency exchange rates may decrease margins associated with our sales.rate fluctuations.
 
We have situations in which sales agreements andsignificant investments outside the related cost of sales are predominately denominated in different currencies. These may involve foreignU.S. Further, we have sales and domestic costs, or vice versa. Eachpurchases of these situations involve the risk that the margins associated with these sales could be lower than previous sales or forecasts because of changesraw materials and finished goods in foreign denominated currencies. Accordingly, we have exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.rates relative to the U.S. dollar. Foreign currency exchange rate risk is reduced through several means, including the maintenance of local production facilities in the markets served, invoicing of customers in the same currency as the source of the products, prompt settlement of inter-company balances utilizing a global netting system, and limited use of foreign currency denominated debt. Despite these measures, foreign currency rate fluctuations could have a material adverse effect on our international operations or on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.


14


 
Changes in assumptions may increase the amount of retirement pension and healthcare benefit obligations and related expense.
 
Accounting for retirement pension and healthcare benefit obligations and related expense requires the use of assumptions, including a weighted-average discount rate, an expected long-term rate of return on assets, and a net healthcare cost trend rate, among others. Benefit obligations and benefit costs are sensitive to changes in these assumptions. As a result, assumption changes could result in increases in our obligation amounts and expenses. Significant increases in the amount of retirement pension and healthcare benefit obligations and related expense could have a material adverse affect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
 
Industry Risks
 
Competitors may develop breakthrough technologies that are adopted by our customers.
 
Many of the components and systems we sell are used in harsh environments with stringent emissions standards. The technological expertise we have developed and maintained could become less valuable if a competitor were to develop a breakthrough technology that would allow them to match or exceed the performance of existing technologies at a lower cost. A breakthrough technologyIf we are unable to develop competitive technologies, future sales or earnings could also acceleratebe lower than expected, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
Industry consolidation trends could reduce our sales opportunities, decrease sales prices, and drive down demand for our product.
There has been consolidation and there may be further consolidation in the rateaerospace, power, and process industries. The consolidation in these industries has resulted in customers with vertically integrated operations, including increased in-sourcing capabilities, which may result in economies of changescale for those companies. If our customers continue to seek to control more aspects of vertically integrated projects, cost pressures resulting in customer demands beyond what existing technologies are capablefurther integration or industry consolidation could reduce our sales opportunities, decrease sales prices, and drive down demand for our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of achieving.operations, and cash flows.
 
Changes in competitor strategies may reduce the demand for our products.
 
Companies compete on the basis of providing products that meet the needs of customers, as well as on the basis of price, quality, and customer service. Changes in competitive conditions, including the availability of new products and services, the introduction of new channels of distribution, and changes in OEM and aftermarket pricing, could negativelyadversely affect future sales.sales, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.


9


Unforeseen events may occur that significantly reduce commercial airline travel.
 
Our Turbine Systems segment accounted for 48%46% of our external sales in 2007,2008, with the majority of sales tied to commercial aviation. Market demand for our components and systems would be negatively affected by reductions in commercial airline travel and commercial airlines’ financial difficulties. Certain events, such as the terrorist actions of 2001, have had a notable negative effect on passenger flight miles in the past such as the terrorist actions of 2001, and the airlines’ revenues. Currently, increases in fuel costs, high labor costs, and heightened competition from low cost carriers have adversely affected the financial condition of some commercial airlines. In addition, the current economic downturn has led to a general reduction in air travel, and any further deterioration of economic conditions in the U.S. and internationally could lead to additional reductions in air travel. Market demand for our components and systems could be materially adversely affected by such reductions in commercial airline travel and commercial airlines’ financial difficulties, which could have a material adverse affect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
 
Increasing emission standards that drive certain product sales may be eased or delayed.
 
We sell components and systems that have been designed to meet demanding emission standards, including standards that have not yet been implemented but are intended to be soon. If these emission standards are eased, our future sales could be lower as potential customers select alternative products or delay adoption of our products.products, which would have a material adverse affect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.


15


Natural gas prices may increase significantly and disproportionately to other sources of fuels used for power generation.
 
Commercial producers of electricity use many of our components and systems, most predominately in their power plants that use natural gas as their fuel source. Commercial producers of electricity are often in a position to manage the use of different power plant facilities and make decisions based on operating costs. If natural gas prices were to increase significantly and disproportionatelyCompared to other sources of fuels it is likely thatused for power generation, natural gas prices have increased slower than fuel oil, but about the same as coal. This increase in natural gas prices and any future increases could decrease the use of our components and systems, would decrease.which could have a material adverse affect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
 
The U.S. government may reduce defense funding or the mix of programs to which such funding is allocated.
 
The level of U.S. defense spending is subject to periodic congressional appropriation actions, which can change. The mix of programs to which such funding is allocated is also uncertain. A portion of our sales of components and systems is to the U.S. government, primarily in the aerospace market. The level of U.S. defense spending is subject to periodic congressional appropriation actions, which is subject to change at any time. The mix of programs to which such funding is allocated is also uncertain, and we can provide no assurance that an increase in defense spending will be allocated to programs that would benefit our business. If the amount of spending was to decrease, or there was a shift from certain aerospace programs to other programs, our sales could decrease.decrease, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
 
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates or in interest rates may reduce the demand for our products.
 
ChangesA significant portion of our business is conducted in currencies other than the U.S. dollar which exposes us to movements in foreign currency exchange rates orrates. These exposures may change over time as our business and business practices evolve, and they could have a material adverse effect on our financial results and cash flows. An increase in interest rates affects demand for capital purchases. Eachthe value of the U.S. dollar could increase the real cost to our customers of our products in those markets in whichoutside the U.S. where we sell operates globallyin dollars, and is influenced bya weakened dollar could increase the cost of local operating expenses and procurement of raw materials to the extent that we must purchase components in foreign currencies. Continued instability in the worldwide financial markets could impact our ability to effectively manage our foreign currency exchange rates. Also, capital expenditures tend to decrease as interest ratesrate fluctuation risk, which could negatively impact our business, financial condition, results of operations, and economic uncertainty rise.cash flows.
 
Investment Risks
 
The historic market price of our common stock may not be indicative of future market prices.
 
The market price of our common stock changes over time. Stock markets in general have experienced significant price and volume volatility over the past year. The trading price of our common stock ranged from a low of $32.65$24.50 per share to a high of $66.28$48.62 per share in fiscal 2007.2008. The causesmarket price and volume of trading of our common stock price volatility are relatedmay continue to manybe subject to significant fluctuations due not only to general stock market conditions, but also to factors both within and outside management’s control.such as general conditions in the aerospace industry or a change in sentiment in the market regarding our operations or business prospects. As a result, we may not be able to maintain or increase the valuemarket price of our common stock.stock may fluctuate or decline significantly in the future.
 
The typical trading volume of our common stock may affect an investor’s ability to sell significant sharestock holdings in the future without negatively affecting sharestock price.
 
We currently have approximately 3468 million shares of common stock outstanding. While the level of trading activity will vary by day, the typical trading level represents only a small percentage of total shares of stock outstanding. As a result, a seller ofwho a significant number of shares of stock in a short period of time could negatively affect our share price.
 
Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments
 
None.


1016


Item 2.  Properties
 
Our principal plants are as follows:
 
United States
 
Fort Collins, Colorado — Turbine Systems, Engine Systems, and Electrical Power Systems manufacturing, engineering, and corporate headquarters
Loveland, Colorado — Turbine Systems and Engine Systems manufacturing and partially leased to a third party
Niles, Illinois — Engine Systems manufacturing and engineering
Rockford, Illinois — Turbine Systems manufacturing and engineering
Rockton, Illinois — Turbine Systems manufacturing and repair and overhaul
Zeeland, Michigan — Turbine Systems manufacturing and engineering
Greenville, South Carolina (leased) — Turbine Systems manufacturing and engineering
 
Other Countries
 
Suzhou, Peoples’ Republic of China (leased) — Engine Systems manufacturing
Aken, Germany (leased) — Engine Systems manufacturing and engineering
Kempen, Germany — Electrical Power Systems manufacturing and engineering
Stuttgart, Germany (leased) — Electrical Power Systems manufacturing and engineering
Prestwick, Scotland, United Kingdom (leased) — Turbine Systems repair and overhaul
Tianjin, Peoples’ Republic of China (leased) — Engine Systems manufacturing
Krakow, Poland (leased) — Electrical Power Systems manufacturing and engineering
 
In connection with the MPC acquisition, Woodward assumed leases on approximately 450,000 square feet of manufacturing and office space in Skokie and Niles, Illinois. In connection with the acquisition of MotoTron, Woodward assumed office leases in Ann Arbor, Michigan and Columbus, Indiana and established a lease for an office facility in Oshkosh, Wisconsin. Additional information about these acquisitions is included in Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8 — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
In addition to the principal plants listed above, we own or lease other facilities in Brazil, India, Japan, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom and lease several facilities in locations worldwide, which are used primarily for sales and service activities.
 
Our principal plants are suitable and adequate for the manufacturing and other activities performed at those plants, and we believe our utilization levels are generally high. WithHowever, with continuing advancements in manufacturing technology and operational improvements, we believe we can continue to increase production without significant capital expenditures for expansion, retooling, or acquisition of additional plants.
 
We anticipate growth in capacity in the following locations during fiscal 2009: Loveland, Colorado, Tianjin, China, and Krakow, Poland.


17


Item 3.  Legal Proceedings
 
We are currently involved in pending or threatened litigation or other legal proceedings regarding employment, product liability, and contractual matters arising from the normal course of business. TheseWe have accrued for individual matters that we believe are discussedlikely to result in a loss when ultimately resolved using estimates of the most likely amount of loss. There are also individual matters where management believes the likelihood of a loss when ultimately resolved is less than likely but more than remote, which were not accrued. While it is possible that there could be additional losses that have not been accrued, we currently believe the possible additional loss in the Notesevent of an unfavorable resolution of each matter is less than $10,000 in the aggregate.
Specifically, MPC, one of our newly acquired subsidiaries, is subject to an investigation by the DOJ regarding certain of its pricing practices related to government contracts prior to 2006. MPC and the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois have reached a settlement in principle and are in the process of finalizing and obtaining approvals within the DOJ. Final disposition will be subject to acceptance and approval by the U.S. District Court. It is anticipated that any settlement of the matter would involve the payment of monetary fines and other amounts by MPC. MPC is also in the process of working with the U.S. Department of Defense to resolve any administrative matters that may arise out of the investigation. There can be no assurance as to the Consolidated Financial Statementsresolution of these matters. The purchase price for MPC reflects the amount agreed to in “Item 8 — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” principle by MPC with the U.S. Attorney. Any resulting fines or other sanctions beyond this amount could have a material negative impact on Woodward.
We currently do not have any administrative or judicial proceedings arising under any Federal, State, or local provisions regulating the discharge of materials into the environment or primarily for the purpose of protecting the environment.
Woodward does not recognize contingencies that might result in a gain until such contingencies are resolved and the related amounts are realized.
In the event of a change in control of the Company, Woodward may be required to pay termination benefits to certain executive officers.
 
Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
 
There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2007.fiscal 2008.


1118


 
PART II
 
Item 5.  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
 
Our common stock is listed on theThe NASDAQ Global Select Market and at November 20, 2007,17, 2008, there were approximately 1,2201,380 holders of record. Cash dividends were declared quarterly during 20072008 and 2006.2007. The amount of cash dividends per share and the high and low sales price per share for our common stock for each fiscal quarter in 20072008 and 20062007 are included in the NotesNote 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8 — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
 
(a)  Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
(a)  Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
 
Sales of common stock issued from treasury stock to one of the company’s directors during the fourth quarter of 20072008 consisted of the following:following (dollars in thousands):
 
         
  Total
    
  Shares
  Consideration
 
  Purchased  Received 
 
July 1, 2007 through July 31, 2007  198  $12,001 
August 1, 2007 through August 31, 2007      
September 1, 2007 through September 30, 2007      
         
  Total
    
  Shares
  Consideration
 
  Purchased  Received 
 
July 1, 2008 through July 31, 2008  209  $9 
August 1, 2008 through August 31, 2008      
September 1, 2008 through September 30, 2008      
 
The securities were sold in reliance upon the exemption contained in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
 
(b)  Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
(b)  Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
 
                 
           Maximum Number
 
           (or Approximate
 
        Total Number
  Dollar Value)
 
        of Shares
  of Shares that
 
        Purchased as
  May Yet
 
        Part of
  Be Purchased
 
  Total Number
  Average Price
  Publicly Announced
  Under the
 
  of Shares
  Paid Per
  Plans or
  Plans or
 
Period
 Purchased  Share  Programs  Programs(1)(2) 
 
July 1, 2007 through July 31, 2007    $     $43,064,045 
August 1, 2007 through August 31, 2007  197,682   60.45   197,682   31,114,259 
August 1, 2007 through August 31, 2007 under the accelerated stock repurchase agreement  453,524   58.87   453,524   4,415,301 
September 1, 2007 through September 30, 2007  397(3)  59.55   397   204,415,301 
                 
           Maximum Number
 
           (or Approximate
 
        Total Number
  Dollar Value)
 
        of Shares
  of Shares that
 
        Purchased as
  May Yet
 
        Part of
  Be Purchased
 
  Total Number
  Average Price
  Publicly Announced
  Under the
 
  of Shares
  Paid Per
  Plans or
  Plans or
 
Period
 Purchased  Share  Programs  Programs(1) 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
 
July 1, 2008 through July 31, 2008    $     $168,075 
August 1, 2008 through August 31, 2008(2)    $     $168,075 
September 1, 2008 through September 30, 2008(3)(4)  554  $43.30     $168,075 
 
 
(1)In July 2006, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $50 million of our outstanding shares of common stock on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions over a three-year period (the “2006 Authorization”). During fiscal 2007, we purchased a total of $38.6 million of our common stock under the 2006 Authorization. Pursuant to the 2006 Authorization, in August 2007, we entered into an agreement with J.P. Morgan Chase Bank whereby we purchased 453,524 common shares in exchange for $31.1 million. Under the accelerated stock repurchase agreement, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank is to purchase an equivalent number of our common shares in the open market over a period of up to four months, and at the end of that period, additional shares may be delivered to or by us based on the volume-weighted average price of our common shares during the same period, subject to a cap and a floor as determined according to the terms of agreement. 75,000 common shares have been held back from the repurchase to allow for net share settlement, if required. This arrangement with J.P. Morgan Chase Bank completed the stock repurchase program previously authorized in July 2006.


12


(2)During September 2007, the Board of Directors authorized a new stock repurchase program of up to $200 million of our outstanding shares of common stock on the open market or privately negotiated transactions over a three-year period that will end in October 2010. During the first half of fiscal year 2008, $31,925 was spent from this allocated pool for repurchase of stock.
(2)Does not include 21,265 shares acquired as part of the exercise of stock options in August 2008.
 
(3)Does not include 2,677 shares acquired as part of the exercise of stock options in September 2008.
(4)We purchased 397554 shares on the open market related to the reinvestment of dividends for shares of treasury sharesstock held for deferred compensation in September 2007.
Common stock performance
The graph depicted below shows a comparison of Woodward’s cumulative total return on its common stock for a five-year period with the cumulative total return of the S&P Small Cap 600 Index and the S&P Industrial Machinery Index.
(1)The graph covers the period from September 30, 2002, the last trading date before the beginning of Woodward’s 2003 fiscal year, to September 28, 2007; the last trading date of Woodward’s 2007 fiscal year.
(2)The graph assumes that the value of the investment in Woodward’s common stock and each index was $100 on September 30, 2002 and that all dividends were reinvested.2008.
 
The information required by this item relating to securities authorized for issuance under equity plans is included under the caption “Executive Compensation — Equity Compensation Plan Information” in our Proxy Statement for the 20072008 Annual Meeting of ShareholdersStockholders to be held January 23, 200822, 2009 and is incorporated herein by reference.


1319


Item 6.  Selected Financial Data
 
The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes which appear in ‘‘Item“Item 8 - Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”, of this Annual Report.
 
                                        
 Year Ended September 30,  Year Ended September 30, 
 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003  2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 
 (In thousands except per share amounts)  (In thousands except per share amounts) 
Net sales $1,042,337  $854,515  $827,726  $709,805  $586,682  $1,258,204   1,042,337   854,515   827,726   709,805 
Net Earnings(4)  98,157   69,900   55,971   31,382   12,346  $121,880   98,157   69,900   55,971   31,382 
Earnings per share:                    
Earnings per share(3):                    
Basic  2.87   2.03   1.64   0.93   0.37  $1.80   1.43   1.02   0.82   0.46 
Diluted  2.79   1.99   1.59   0.90   0.36  $1.75   1.39   0.99   0.80   0.45 
Dividends per share  0.43   0.40   0.35   0.32   0.32 
Cash dividends per share $0.235   0.215   0.200   0.175   0.160 
Income taxes  33,831   14,597   23,137   17,910   7,593  $60,030   33,831   14,597   23,137   17,910 
Interest expense  4,527   5,089   5,814   5,332   4,635  $3,834   4,527   5,089   5,814   5,332 
Interest income  3,604   2,750   2,159   1,095   870  $2,120   3,604   2,750   2,159   1,095 
Depreciation expense  25,428   22,064   24,451   25,856   27,548  $28,620   25,428   22,064   24,451   25,856 
Amortization expense  7,496   6,953   7,087   6,905   4,870  $6,830   7,496   6,953   7,087   6,905 
Capital expenditures  31,984   31,713   26,615   18,698   18,802  $41,099   31,984   31,713   26,615   18,698 
Weighted-average shares outstanding:                                        
Basic shares outstanding  34,245   34,351   34,200   33,858   33,738   67,564   68,489   68,702   68,400   67,716 
Diluted shares outstanding  35,244   35,191   35,127   34,695   34,167   69,560   70,487   70,382   70,254   69,390 
 
                                        
 At September 30,  At September 30, 
 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003  2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 
 (Dollars in thousands)  (Dollars in thousands) 
Working capital $275,611  $260,243  $241,066  $197,524  $151,262  $ 369,211    275,611   260,243   241,066   197,524 
Total assets  829,767   735,497   705,466   654,294   615,999  $ 927,017   829,767   735,497   705,466   654,294 
Long-term debt, less current portion  45,150   58,379   72,942   88,452   89,970  $ 33,337   45,150   58,379   72,942   88,452 
Total debt  66,586   73,515   95,787   95,241   125,744  $ 48,928   66,586   73,515   95,787   95,241 
Total liabilities  285,336   256,808   272,997   268,433   255,195  $ 297,389   285,336   256,808   272,997   268,433 
Shareholders’ equity  544,431   478,689   432,469   385,861   360,804 
Worker members  4,248   3,731   3,513   3,287   3,273 
Registered shareholder members  1,229   1,442   1,448   1,529   1,576 
Stockholders’ equity $ 629,628   544,431   478,689   432,469   385,861 
Full-time worker members  4,476   4,248   3,731   3,513   3,287 
Registered stockholder members  1,358   1,229   1,442   1,448   1,529 
 
 
Notes:
 
1.Per share amounts have been updated from amounts reported prior to February 1, 2006 to reflect the effect of a three-for-one stock split.
2.Net earnings for fiscal 2007 included two tax adjustments, a favorable resolution of issues with tax authorities resulting in a reduction of net tax expense of $13,300$13.3 million and a reduction in deferred tax assets resulting in a tax expense of $3,000$3.0 million due to a decrease in the German statutory income tax rate. These adjustments increased net earnings by $10,300 in the fourth quarter of 2007,$10.3 million, or $0.30$0.15 per basic share and $0.29$0.15 per diluted share.
 
3.2.Net earnings for fiscal 2006 included a deferred tax asset valuation allowance change that increased net earnings by $13,710 in the third quarter of 2006,$13.7 million, or $0.40$0.20 per basic share and $0.39$0.19 per diluted share.
3.Per share amounts have been updated from amounts reported prior to February 1, 2008 to reflect the effect of a two-for-one stock split and prior to February 1, 2006 to reflect the effect of a three-for-one stock split.
 
4.Accounting for stock-based compensation changed to the fair value method from the intrinsic value method beginning in the first quarter of 2006.fiscal 2006, concurrent with the adoption on October 1, 2005 of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 123R, “Share-Based Payments.” The following presents a reconciliation of reported net earnings and per share information to pro forma net earnings and per share information that would


1420


share information to pro forma net earnings and per share information that would have been reported if the fair value method had been used to account for stock-based employee compensation in 2003 throughfiscal 2004 and fiscal 2005:
 
                    
 Year Ended September 30,  Year Ended September 30, 
 2005 2004 2003  2005 2004 
 (In thousands except per share amounts)  (In thousands except per share amounts) 
Reported net earnings $55,971  $31,382  $12,346  $55,971  $31,382 
Stock based compensation expense using fair value method, net of tax  1,502   1,400   1,025   1,502   1,400 
            
Pro forma net earnings $54,469  $29,982  $11,321  $54,469  $29,982 
            
Reported net earnings per share:                    
Basic $1.64  $0.93  $0.37  $0.82  $0.46 
Diluted  1.59   0.90   0.36  $0.80  $0.45 
Pro forma net earnings per share:                    
Basic $1.59  $0.89  $0.34  $0.80  $0.44 
Diluted  1.55   0.86   0.33  $0.78  $0.43 


21


Item 77..  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
OVERVIEW
 
We design, manufacture,Woodward designs, manufactures, and serviceservices energy control systems and components for commercial and military aircraft, and industrialturbines, reciprocating engines, and turbines and electrical power system equipment. Our innovative fluid energy, combustion control, electrical energy, and motion control systems help customers offer cleaner, more reliable, and more cost-effective equipment. Leading OEMs throughout the worldoriginal equipment manufacturers use our products and services in the aerospace, power and process industries, and transportation markets.transportation.
 
Our strategic focus is Energy Control and Optimization Solutions. The control of energy — fluid energy, combustion, electrical energy, and motion — is a growing requirement in the markets we serve. Our customers look to us to optimize the efficiency, emissions, and operations of power equipment. Our core technologies leverage well across our markets and customer applications, enabling us to develop and integrate cost-effective and state-of-the-art fuel, combustion, fluid, actuation, and electronic systems. We focus primarily on OEMs and equipment packagers, partnering with them to bring superior component and system solutions to their demanding applications.
 
We have three operatingbusiness segments — Turbine Systems, Engine Systems, and Electrical Power Systems. Turbine Systems is focused on systems and components that provide energy control and optimization solutions for the aircraft and industrial gas turbine markets. Engine Systems is focused on systems and components that provide energy control and optimization solutions for the industrial engine and steam turbine markets, which include power generation, transportation, and process industries. Electrical Power Systems is focused on systems and components that provide power sensing and energy control systems thatto improve the security, quality, reliability, and availability of electrical power networks for industrial markets, which include power generation, power distribution, transportation, and process industries.
On October 1, 2008, we acquired MPC in a transaction valued at approximately $383 million. MPC is a privately-held company headquartered in Skokie, Illinois. MPC’s products include high performance motors and sensors, analog and digital control electronics, rotary and linear actuation systems, and flight deck andfly-by-wire systems. MPC’s products are used in both commercial and military aerospace programs. MPC’s customer list includes airframers such as Boeing and Airbus, as well as tier-one suppliers, such as Raytheon and Honeywell. MPC will form our fourth business segment, Airframe Systems. This segment allows us to focus on the airframe applications of both MPC’s and Woodward’s technologies and products. We are also evaluating opportunities to leverage MPC’s competencies into our traditional market niches. Additional information about Airframe Systems and the acquisition is included in Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8 — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
We use segment information internally to assess the performance of each segment and to make decisions on the allocation of resources.
 
Our sales andhave increased at an annual rate of 15% from fiscal 2004 to fiscal 2008. Our earnings have grown over the last four years.increased at an annual rate of 40% from fiscal 2004 to fiscal 2008. In 2007,2008, we achieved record sales of $1.042$1.26 billion and our net earnings were just over $98$121.9 million. Our markets showed continued strength through fiscal 2008 and we were well positioned to capture the opportunities presented in each of our segments.
 
We took advantage of two continuing trends in our markets — the increasing global need for both energy efficiency and emissions reductions, where our products meet customer expectations by providing superior performance. At September 30, 2007,2008, our total assets exceeded $829were approximately $927.0 million, including $72$109.9 million in cash, and our total debt was approximately $67$48.9 million. As discussed in Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8 — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” an aggregate $400.0 million of additional debt was issued on October 1, 2008 and October 30, 2008, a substantial portion of which was used to finance the MPC acquisition. We are well positioned to fund expanded research and development and to explore other investment opportunities consistent with our focused strategies.
 
In the sections that follow, we are providing information to help you better understand our critical accounting policiesestimates and market risks, our results of operations and financial condition, and the effects of recent accounting pronouncements.


1522


CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIESESTIMATES
 
The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United StatesU.S. (“U.S.GAAP”) requires us to make judgments, assumptions, and estimates that affect the amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes. Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements describes the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements. The accounting policiespositions described below are significantly affected by critical accounting estimates. Such accounting policiespositions require significant judgments, assumptions, and estimates to be used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements, and actual results could differ materially from the amounts reported based on variability in factors affecting these policies.estimates.
Our management has discussed the development and selection of these critical accounting estimates with the audit committee of our board of directors, and the audit committee has reviewed our disclosures to it in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis.
 
Revenue Recognition
We apply the provisions of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition,” and all related interpretations. Revenue is recognized when delivery of product has occurred or services have been rendered and there is persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement, selling prices are fixed or determinable, and collectibility from the customer is reasonably assured. We consider product delivery to have occurred when the customer has taken title and assumed the risks and rewards of ownership of the products. Most of our sales are made directly to customers that use our products, although we also sell products to distributors, dealers, and independent service facilities. Sales terms for distributors, dealers, and independent service facilities are identical to our sales terms for direct customers. We account for payments made to customers as a reduction of revenue unless they are made in exchange for identifiable goods or services with fair values that can be reasonably estimated. These reductions in revenues are recognized immediately to the extent that the payments cannot be attributed to expected future sales, and are recognized in future periods to the extent that the payments relate to future sales, based on the specific facts and circumstances underlying each payment.
Accounts Receivable
Virtually all our sales are made on credit and result in accounts receivable, which are recorded at the amount invoiced. In the normal course of business, not all accounts receivable are collected and, therefore, an allowance for losses of accounts receivable is provided equal to the amount that Woodward believes ultimately will not be collected. Customer-specific information is considered related to delinquent accounts, past loss experience, and current economic conditions in establishing the amount of the allowance. Accounts receivable losses are deducted from the allowance and the related accounts receivable balances are written off when the receivables are deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of accounts receivable previously written off are recognized when received.
Inventory
 
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market, with cost being determined on afirst-in, first-out basis. Customer-specific information and contractual terms are considered when evaluating lower of cost or market considerations. The carrying value of inventory as of September 30, 2008 was $208.3 million. If economic conditions or other factors significantly reduce future customer demand for our products from forecast levels, then future adjustments to the carrying value of inventory may become necessary. We attempt to maintain inventory quantities to levels considered necessary to fill expected orders in a reasonable time frame, which we believe mitigates our exposure to future inventory carrying cost adjustments.
 
Warranty CostsPost-retirement benefits
 
ProvisionsThe Company provides various benefits to certain employees through defined benefit plans and retirement healthcare benefit plans. For financial reporting purposes, net periodic benefits expense and related obligations are calculated using a number of significant actuarial assumptions, including anticipated discount rates, rates of compensation increases, long-term return on defined benefit plan investments, and anticipated healthcare cost increases. Changes in net periodic expense may occur in the future due to changes in these assumptions.
Estimates of the sales agreements include product warranties customaryvalue of post-retirement benefit obligations, and related net periodic benefits expense, are dependent on actuarial assumptions including future interest rates, compensation rates, healthcare cost trends, and returns on defined benefit plan investments. Variances from our year end estimates for these variables could materially affect our recognized post-retirement benefit obligation liabilities. On a near-term basis, such changes are unlikely to have a material impact on reported earnings, since such agreements. Accrualsadjustments are established for specifically identified warranty issuesrecorded to other comprehensive income and recognized into expense over a number of years. Significant changes in estimates could, however, materially affect the carrying amounts of projected benefit obligation liabilities, which could affect loan covenant compliance and future borrowing capacity. As of September 30, 2008, the projected benefit obligation of all of our post-retirement benefit plans was $101.1 million. In light of recent global economic instability, management considers the likelihood that are probable to resultsuch assumptions may change significantly in future costs. Warranty costs are accrued on a non-specific basis whenever past experience indicates a normal and predictable pattern exists.periods to be greater than in recent years.
 
Goodwill ImpairmentReviews for impairment of goodwill
 
Our methodologyAt September 30, 2008, we had $139.6 million of goodwill, or 15% of total assets. We test goodwill for allocatingimpairment at least annually, during the purchase price relating to purchase acquisitions is determined through established valuation techniques. Goodwill is measured assecond quarter, and whenever events occur or circumstances change that indicate there may be an impairment. These events or circumstances could include a significant adverse change in the excessbusiness climate, poor indicators of the costoperating performance, or a sale or disposition of acquisition over the sum of the amounts assigned to tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired less liabilities assumed. We perform goodwill impairment tests on an annual basis and between annual tests in certain circumstances for eacha significant reporting unit. In response
We test goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level. Our reporting units are our operating segments. Testing goodwill for impairment requires us to changes in industry and market conditions, we could be required to strategically realign our resources and consider restructuring, disposing of, or otherwise exiting businesses, which could result in an impairment of goodwill. There was no impairmentdetermine the amount of goodwill in fiscal 2007, 2006, or 2005.associated with reporting units, estimate fair values of those reporting units, and determine their carrying values. These processes are subjective and


1623


Other long-livedrequire significant estimates. These estimates include judgments about future cash flows that are dependent on internal forecasts, long-term growth rates, allocations of commonly shared assets, and estimates of weighted-average cost of capital used to discount future cash flows. Changes in these estimates and assumptions could materially affect the results of our reviews for impairment of goodwill.
 
Our other long-lived assets consist of property, plant, and equipment, and other intangibles, whichimpairment analysis is partially dependent upon future cash flow projections for our operating segments, discounted at appropriate interest rates. If future sales are included primarilysignificantly impacted by changes in the segment assets. We depreciate or amortize long-lived assets over their estimated useful lives. We test long-lived assets for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying values may not be recoverable.
The carrying value of a long-lived asset, or related group of assets, is reduced to its fair value whenever estimates ofoverall economy, negatively affecting future cash flows, are insufficient to indicateor if interest rates change significantly from current levels, then the carrying value is recoverable. We form judgments as to whether recoverability shouldimpairment assessment could be assessed. We estimateeffected, which could materially impact our results of operations and financial position. Management believes that changes in future cash flows and, if necessary, we estimate fair value.and/or interest rates of significant magnitude to result in a future impairment charge against goodwill recorded as of September 30, 2008 are unlikely.
 
Foreign currency translation
The assets and liabilities of substantially all subsidiaries outside the United States are translated at year-end rates of exchange, and earnings and cash flow statements are translated at weighted-average rates of exchange. Translation adjustments are accumulated with other comprehensive earnings as a separate component of shareholders’ equity and are presented net of tax effects in the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity. The effects of changes in exchange rates on loans between consolidated subsidiaries that are not expected to be repaid in the foreseeable future are also accumulated with other comprehensive earnings.
Income taxes
 
We are subject to income taxes in both the United StatesU.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in evaluating our tax positions and determining our provision for income taxes.
 
During the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. We establish reserves for tax-related uncertainties based on estimates of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. The reserves are established when we believe that certain positions are likely to be challenged and may not be fully sustained on review by tax authorities. We adjust these reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the closing of a tax audit or refinement of an estimate. Although we believe our reserves are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final outcome of these matters will not be different from that which is reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals. To the extent that the final tax outcome of these matters is different than the amounts recorded, such differences will impact the provision for income taxes. The provision for income taxes includes the impact of reserve provisions and changes to reserves that are considered appropriate. As of September 30, 2008, unrecognized net tax benefits for which recognition has been deferred following the guidance of FIN 48 was $22.6 million.
 
Significant judgment is also required in determining any valuation allowance recorded against deferred tax assets. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, we consider all available evidence including past operating results, estimates of future taxable income, and the feasibility of tax planning strategies. In the event that we change our determination as to the amount of deferred tax assets that can be realized, we will adjust our valuation allowance with a corresponding impact to the provision for income taxes in the period in which such determination is made. As of September 30, 2008, our valuation allowance was $0.1 million.
 
Our effective tax rates differ from the statutory rate primarily due to the tax impact of foreign operations, adjustments of valuation allowances, research tax credits, state taxes, and tax audit settlements.
 
Our provision for income taxes is subject to volatility and could be affected by the following: earnings that are different than anticipated in countries which have lower or higher tax rates; by changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities; by transfer pricing adjustments; by tax effects of share-basedstock-based compensation; by costs or benefits related to intercompany restructurings; or by changes in tax laws, regulations, and accounting principles, including accounting for uncertain tax positions, or interpretations thereof. In addition, we are subject to examination of our income tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes.
There can be no assurance that the outcomes from these examinations will not have an effect on our operating results and financial condition.


17


Retirement pension and healthcare benefits
The cost of retirement pension and healthcare benefits is recognized over employee service periods using an actuarial-based attribution approach. To determine our net accrued benefit and net periodic benefit cost, we form judgments about the best estimate for each assumption used in the actuarial computation. The most important assumptions that affect the computations are the discount rate, the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, and the healthcare cost trend rate.
Our discount rate assumption is intended to reflect the rate at which the retirement benefits could be effectively settled based upon the assumed timing of the benefit payments. In the United States, we use the blended 40/60 Moody’s Baa/Aaa index, the Citigroup Pension Liability Index, and the30-year U.S. treasury rate as benchmarks. In the United Kingdom, we use the AA corporate bond index (applicable for bonds over 15 years) and government bond yields (for bonds over 15 years) to determine a blended rate to use as the benchmark. In Japan, we use AA-rated corporate bond yields (for bonds over 12.5 years) as the benchmark. Our assumed rates do not differ significantly from any of these benchmarks.
Among the items affecting our net accrued retirement pension benefits were additional minimum pension liabilities necessary to reflect a liability amount at least equal to the accumulated benefit obligation on an individual plan basis. The total increase in minimum pension liabilities for 2007 was $1.3 million. At September 30, 2007, the unamortized actuarial loss is reported in the “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” line of the Consolidated Balance Sheet as a result of the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Post Retirement Plans” (“SFAS 158”). Based on future plan asset performance and discount rates, additional adjustments to our net accrued benefit and equity may be required in the future.
Share-based compensation expense
On October 1, 2005, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment (“SFAS 123(R)”) which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to our employees and directors, including stock options granted as part of our 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan and the 2002 Stock Option Plan, based on estimated fair values. Share-based expense recognized under SFAS 123(R) was as follows (in thousands):
         
  Year Ended September 30, 
  2007  2006 
 
Employee share-based compensation expense $3,849  $2,942 
Upon adopting SFAS 123(R), we began estimating the value of employee stock options on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model. The use of the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model requires extensive actual employee exercise behavior data and a number of complex assumptions including expected volatility, risk-free interest rate, expected dividends and forfeitures.
The weighted-average assumptions using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model are summarized as follows:
      
  Year Ended September 30,
  2007 2006
 
Weighted-average assumptions:     
Life 7 years  7 years
Expected volatility 37.0%  37.0%
Risk-free interest rate 4.4% - 5.0%  4.5% - 4.6%
Expected dividend yield 1.7%  1.7%
We used the implied volatility for our stock as the expected volatility assumption in the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model consistent with SFAS 123(R) and SAB 107. The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon observed interest rates appropriate for the term of our employee stock options. The dividend yield assumption


18


is based on history and expectation of dividend payouts. Because share-based compensation expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for forfeitures. If factors change and we employ different assumptions in the application of SFAS 123(R) in future periods, the compensation expense that we record under SFAS 123(R) may differ significantly from what we have recorded.
MARKET RISKS
Our long-term debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates. We monitor trends in interest rates as a basis for determining whether to enter into fixed rate or variable rate debt agreements, the duration of such agreements, and whether to use hedging strategies. Our primary objective is to minimize our long-term costs of borrowing. At September 30, 2007, our long-term debt consisted of fixed rate agreements. As measured at September 30, 2007, a hypothetical 1% immediate increase in interest rates would reduce the fair value of our long-term debt by approximately $1.3 million.
Assets, liabilities, and commitments that are to be settled in cash and are denominated in foreign currencies for transaction purposes are sensitive to changes in currency exchange rates. We monitor trends in foreign currency exchange rates and our exposure to changes in those rates as a basis for determining whether to use hedging strategies. Our primary exposures are to the European Monetary Union euro and the Japanese yen. As of September 30, 2007, we do not have any derivative instruments associated with foreign currency exchange rates. A hypothetical 10% immediate increase in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to all other currencies, when applied to September 30, 2007 balances, would adversely affect our 2008 net earnings and cash flows by approximately $2.0 million. A hypothetical 10% immediate decrease in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to all other currencies, when applied to September 30, 2007, balances, would favorably affect our 2008 net earnings and cash flows by approximately $2.0 million. Last year, a hypothetical 10% immediate increase in the value of the United States dollar relative to all other currencies would have adversely affected our 2007 net earnings and cash flows by $3.6 million.
The following information illustrates the sensitivity of the net periodic benefit cost and the projected benefit obligation to a change in the discount rate and return on plan assets (amounts in thousands). Amounts relating to foreign plans are translated at the spot rate on September 30, 2007. The sensitivities reflect the impact of changing one assumption at a time and are specific to base conditions at September 30, 2007. It should be noted that economic factors and conditions often affect multiple assumptions simultaneously and the effects of changes in assumptions are not necessarily linear.
               
    Increase/(Decrease) in 
       2007 Projected
  Accumulated Post
 
    2008 Net Periodic
  Service and
  Retirement Benefit
 
Assumption
 Change Benefit Cost  Interest Costs  Obligation 
    (In thousands) 
 
Retirement Pension Benefits:
              
Discount rate 1% increase $(517) $(678) $(12,464)
  1% decrease  516   855   15,484 
Retirement Healthcare Benefits:
              
Discount rate 1% increase  N/A   N/A   (4,015)
  1% decrease  N/A   N/A   4,736 
Healthcare cost trend rate 1% increase  4,966   305   N/A 
  1% decrease  (4,277)  (263)  N/A 


1924


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
Sales
 
The following table presents the breakdown of consolidated net external sales by segment (in thousands):
 
                         
Year Ended September 30,
 2007  2006  2005 
 
Turbine Systems $502,557   48% $438,726   51% $414,467   50%
Engine Systems  414,076   40   390,619   46   392,079   47 
Electrical Power Systems  125,704   12   25,170   3   21,180   3 
                         
Consolidated net external sales $1,042,337   100% $854,515   100% $827,726   100%
                         
The following table presents the breakdown of intersegment net sales by segment (in thousands):
                                          
Year Ended September 30,
 2007 2006 2005  2008 2007 2006 
Segment net sales
                        
Turbine Systems $21,285   18% $20,197   18% $19,563   18% $595,774   47% $523,842   50% $458,923   54%
Engine Systems  41,124   35   39,829   36   38,813   36   499,318   40   455,200   44   430,448   50 
Electrical Power Systems  55,662   47   51,016   46   48,568   46   289,294   23   181,366   17   76,186   9 
                          
Consolidated intersegment net sales $118,071   100% $111,042   100% $106,944   100%
Total segment net sales  1,384,386   110   1,160,408   111   965,557   113 
Less intersegment net sales
                        
Turbine Systems  (18,470)  (2)  (21,285)  (2)  (20,197)  (2)
Engine Systems  (41,141)  (3)  (41,124)  (4)  (39,829)  (5)
Electrical Power Systems  (66,571)  (5)  (55,662)  (5)  (51,016)  (6)
                          
Consolidated net external sales $1,258,204   100% $1,042,337   100% $854,515   100%
             
 
Intersegment sales primarily reflect contract-manufacturing activity across business segments. Turbine Systems and Engine Systems sell electronic controls manufactured by Electrical Power Systems as part of their system offerings. These intersegment activities have been increasing as a result of our Turbine and Engine SystemsSystems’ segments growing their respective external sales.
2008 Compared to 2007
Consolidated net external sales increased 21% from fiscal 2007 to fiscal 2008. The increase was attributable to the following (in thousands):
     
•  Consolidated net external sales for year ended September 30, 2007 $1,042,337 
•  Turbine Systems volume changes  58,688 
•  Engine Systems volume changes  19,743 
•  Electrical Power Systems volume changes  76,856 
•  Price changes  13,613 
•  Foreign currency translation  46,967 
     
•  Consolidated net external sales for year ended September 30, 2008 $1,258,204 
     
Turbine Systems’ sales volume changes:  Turbine Systems’ sales performance reflected generally strong demand for our OEM offerings in the industrial and aerospace turbine markets, including our recently introduced control systems for business jets and power generation OEM and the government for military applications. This mix of aerospace growth was consistent with our expectations and reflects the high volume of orders for new aircraft with engines containing increased Woodward content.
Engine Systems’ sales volume changes:  The primary drivers of the growth in sales volume for Engine Systems are increased production in the marine and alternative fuel markets as well as growth in demand in the power and process markets. Engine Systems’ sales were boosted by demand for our control systems for large, natural gas-powered on-highway vehicles, and our offerings in the marine market.
Electrical Power Systems’ sales volume changes:  Demand in both the power generation and distribution and wind inverter turbine markets continues to drive growth in sales of Electrical Power Systems. The growth in wind turbine inverter demand has been strong. The increase in Electrical Power Systems’ intercompany sales is the result of higher external sales in Turbines Systems and Engine Systems of products that incorporate electronic controls manufactured by Electrical Power Systems.


25


Price changes:  Selling price increases were across most products in Turbine Systems and Engine Systems impacting spares and components used in the aerospace aftermarket. These selling price changes were in response prevailing market conditions as prices fluctuated for commodities used to produce mechanical, electrical, or electromagnetic components.
Foreign currency translation:  Our worldwide sales activities are primarily denominated in U.S. dollar (“USD”), European Monetary Unit Euro (the “Euro”), and Great Britain pound (“GBP”). As these currencies fluctuate against each other and other currencies, we are exposed to gains or losses on sales transactions. During fiscal 2008, approximately 22% of the increase in net external sales was due to changes in the foreign currency exchange rates.
 
2007 Compared to 2006
 
Consolidated net external sales increased 22% from fiscal 2006 to fiscal 2007. The increase was attributable to the following (in thousands):
 
        
• Consolidated net external sales for year ended September 30, 2006 $854,515  $854,515 
• Turbine Systems volume changes  54,687   54,687 
• Engine Systems volume changes  9,018   9,018 
• Electrical Power Systems volume changes  5,082   5,082 
• SEG related revenue  92,776 
• Schaltanlagen-Elektronik-Geräte GmbH & Co. KG (“SEG”) related revenue  92,776 
• Price changes  11,327   11,327 
• Foreign currency translation  14,932   14,932 
      
• Consolidated net external sales for year ended September 30, 2007 $1,042,337  $1,042,337 
      
 
Turbine Systems’ sales volume changes:  Turbine Systems’ improvement reflects the favorable trends in all segments of our aerospace business. We continue to seesaw strong growth in the business and regional aviation markets with order backlogs and deliveries significantly higher than 2006 levels. Overall fleet growth and increased utilization has resulted in strong demand for repair and related aftermarket service. Our significant development efforts on the GEnx fuel system for the Boeing Dreamliner, the GP7200 fuel system components for the A380 and the PW600 control system for the Mustang and the Eclipse arewere making the transition from research to production. We continue to seesaw a trend toward higher revenue passenger miles incurred by commercial airlines and cargo growth, which drivesdrove aircraft usage and hashad a positive effect on our aftermarket sales. We estimate approximately 40% of Turbine Systems’ sales were aftermarket for fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006.
 
Engine Systems’ sales volume changes:  Demand for power generation, such as industrial turbines and large gas and diesel engines, continues to growgrew with the significant increase in global demand for electricity, particularly in distributed power applications. DevelopmentGrowing infrastructure needs in India, China India, and the Middle East is playingrest of Asia played a key role in this growth. Within the transportation market, the marine off-highway, and alternative fuel segments continue to besegment was robust.


20


Electrical Power Systems’ sales volume changes:  As part of our channel development, we gained new customers in the power generation and distribution market. Electrical Power Systems’ sales growth of 60% for the year consisted of 55% organic growth and 5% inorganic.
 
Price changes:  Price changes were made primarily in response to material cost increases in Turbine Systems and Engine Systems. The material cost increases were related to price fluctuations of commodities from which mechanical, electronic, or electromagnetic components are produced.
 
2006 Compared to 2005
Consolidated net external sales increased 3% from fiscal 2005 to fiscal 2006. The increase was attributable to the following (in thousands):
     
•  Consolidated net external sales for year ended September 30, 2005 $827,726 
•  Turbine Systems volume changes  16,483 
•  Engine Systems volume changes  (1,490)
•  Electrical Power Systems volume changes  4,198 
•  Price changes  14,482 
•  Foreign currency translation  (6,884)
     
•  Consolidated net external sales for year ended September 30, 2006 $854,515 
     
Turbine Systems’ sales volume changes:SEG related revenue:  Turbine System’s improvements reflectOn October 31, 2006, we acquired 100% of the effectsstock of favorable trends in commercial aviation. Our commercial OEM sales have increased, driven by the higher production levels of narrow-bodySEG. The acquisition provided us with technologies and wide-body aircraft by Boeing and Airbus, especially the Airbus A320 and Boeing 777. Orders for new aircraft by Asian airlines were particularly strong. Regional jet production by Embraer and Bombardier was fairly similar to the prior year. Sales related to business jets were up slightly. We continued to see a trend toward higher revenue passenger miles incurred by commercial airlines and cargo growth, which drives aircraft usage and has a positive effect onproducts that complemented our aftermarket sales. We estimate approximately 40% of Turbine Systems’ sales were aftermarket for 2006 and 2005. Sales for military applications in 2006 were similar to 2005 levels.
Engine Systems’ sales volume changes:  Overall, Engine Systems’ sales volumes were near the same levels achieved in 2005. While shipment volumes increased for many of our products, we experienced lower sales of steam turbine combustion products used in power generation alternative fuel systems that are sold to Chinese OEMs, and fuel pumpsystem solutions. The results of SEG’s operations were included in fiscal 2007 net sales to an Asian customer that secured an alternative source. In total, these decreases totaled approximately $38 million.
We believefrom the decrease in salesbeginning of turbine combustion products is related to inventory adjustments made by our largest customer. Customer inventory increased in 2004 and 2005 and was reduced inNovember 2006.
Increased sales of other products largely offset these decreases, including sales of process automation valves and actuators that targeted new applications for use in the process industry. The core technologies used in fluid systems, which have typically been applied to gas engines, gas and steam turbines, and compressors, can be applied to the balance of plant equipment in process automation applications. In 2006, we developed a new product for this adjacent market, generating sales of approximately $6 million. Other increases in sales were primarily driven by increased demand for distributed power, marine, and heavy equipment applications.
Electrical Power Systems’ sales volume changes:  As part of our channel development, we gained new customers in the power generation and distribution market.
Price changes:  Price changes were made primarily in response to material cost increases in Turbine Systems and Engine Systems. The material cost increases were related to price fluctuations of commodities from which mechanical, electronic, or electromagnetic components are produced.


2126


Costs and Expenses
 
The following table presents costs and expenses (in thousands):
 
                        
   % of
   % of
   % of
 
               Net
   Net
   Net
 
Year Ended September 30,
 2007 2006 2005  2008 Sales 2007 Sales 2006 Sales 
Net Sales $1,258,204   100.0% $1,042,337   100.0% $854,515   100.0%
             
Cost of goods sold $728,820  $612,263  $623,680  $882,996   70.2% $728,820   69.9% $612,263   71.6%
Selling, general, and administrative expenses  111,297   92,013 �� 79,858   115,399   9.2   111,297   10.7   92,013   10.8 
Research and development costs  65,294   59,861   49,996   73,414   5.8   65,294   6.3   59,861   7.0 
Curtailment gain        (7,825)
Amortization of intangible assets  7,496   6,953   7,087   6,830   0.5   7,496   0.7   6,953   0.8 
Interest and other income  (7,790)  (6,995)  (11,481)  (6,805)  (0.5)  (7,790)  (0.8)  (6,995)  (0.8)
Interest and other expenses  5,232   5,923   7,303   4,460   0.3   5,232   0.5   5,923   0.7 
                    
Consolidated costs and expenses $910,349  $770,018  $748,618  $1,076,294   85.5% $910,349   87.3% $770,018   90.1%
                    
 
2008 Compared to 2007
Cost of goods soldincreased 21% attributable to the following (in thousands):
     
•  Cost of goods sold for the year ended September 30, 2007 $728,820 
•  Increase in sales volume  96,314 
•  Foreign currency translation  32,393 
•  Changes in product mix  13,628 
•  Increased non-volume related freight and product expediting costs  4,809 
•  Other  7,032 
     
•  Cost of goods sold for the year ended September 30, 2008 $882,996 
     
Gross margins were approximately flat at 29.8% for the year ended September 30, 2008 compared to 30.1% for the year ended September 30, 2007. The small decrease in gross margins reflects a change in product mix and increased operating costs associated with productivity enhancements and supply chain constraints.
Our foreign locations purchase goods primarily in Euro and GBP. The change in the foreign currency exchange rates to USD resulted in increased costs during fiscal 2008 as compared to fiscal 2007.
Selling, general, and administrative expensesincreased 4%, attributable to the following (in thousands):
     
•  SG&A for the year ended September 30, 2007 $111,297 
•  Accruals for legal and arbitration matters  (4,429)
•  Variable compensation  2,070 
•  Stock-based compensation expense  628 
•  Foreign currency translation  4,205 
•  Other  1,628 
     
•  SG&A for the year ended September 30, 2008 $115,399 
     
We accrue for individual legal matters that we believe are likely to result in a loss when ultimately resolved using estimates of the most likely amount of loss.


27


Selling, general, and administrative expenses increased primarily from increases in foreign currency translation rates, increased variable compensation, and costs incurred to open new locations, partially offset by a reduction in costs related to legal and arbitration matters. Selling, general, and administrative expenses decreased as a percent of sales year-to-year from 10.7% in fiscal 2007 to 9.2% in fiscal 2008.
Research and development costsincreased 12%, attributable to the following (in thousands):
     
•  Research and development for the year ended September 30, 2007 $65,294 
•  Turbine Systems development activities  2,401 
•  Engine Systems development activities  2,828 
•  Electrical Power Systems development activities  2,891 
     
•  Research and development for the year ended September 30, 2008 $73,414 
     
Research and development costs increased in the year ended September 30, 2008, as compared to the year ended September 30, 2007, reflecting higher levels of development activity. Research and development costs decreased as a percent of sales year-to-year from 6.3% in fiscal 2007 to 5.8% in fiscal 2008.
In the Turbine Systems segment, we continue to work closely with our customers early in their technology development and preliminary design stages. We help our customers by investing in research and technology development programs that improve fuel efficiency, reduce emissions, and lower total cost of ownership, benefiting both operators and the general public. The result of recent investments can be seen in our integrated fuel system selected by GE Aviation for their GEnx turbofan engine, powering the Boeing 787 Dreamliner and Boeing747-8 airliner, and the fuel and combustion components we supply for the Pratt & Whitney F135 and GE Rolls-Royce F136 engines powering the Lockheed-Martin Joint Strike Fighter. We are also developing components for theT700-GE-701D engine that will be used for the upgrades to the Sikorsky Black Hawk and Boeing Apache helicopters, components for the Pratt & Whitney 600 family, the Pratt & Whitney geared turbofan for both the Mitsubishi Regional Jet and the Bombardier CSeries, and the CF34-10 and SAM146 turbo engine programs to be used for global regional jets in the Chinese and Russian markets, among others. Within the industrial markets, Woodward fuel systems, controls, and combustion systems are used on the world’s most advanced industrial gas turbine power plants, oil and gas production facilities, and military marine applications. Most recently, we have expanded our collaboration with key customers by signing joint technology demonstration or production contracts with GE Aviation and Pratt & Whitney for their next generation of commercial aircraft engines and with GE Energy and Pratt & Whitney Power Systems for their next generation of industrial gas turbine applications.
Engine Systems continues to develop components and integrated systems that allow our customers to meet developed countries’ future emissions regulations, ever increasing fuel efficiency demands, and support the growing infrastructure needs in India, China, and the rest of Asia. Development projects include components for our market leading Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) systems for buses and trucks, next generation injectors and pumps for diesel fuel systems used in shipping, construction equipment, and power generation markets, a new line of steam turbine control products, and control systems for the new and growing diesel particulate filter market.
Electrical Power Systems is developing a new grid connected inverter platform that enables large scale wind turbine power integration and also supports local grid codes for High/Low Voltage Ride Through, as well as electrical protection and metering devices that provide safe and more reliable electrical power distribution to commercial and industrial users and utilities in a networked environment. In addition, we continue to develop products for Distributed Energy Resource integration based on our latest power generation controls platform.


28


2007 Compared to 2006
 
Cost of goods soldincreased 19%, attributable to the following (in thousands):
 
     
•  Cost of goods sold for the year ended September 30, 2006 $612,263 
•  Increase in sales volume  31,219 
•  Effects of consolidation of European operations and other  (2,327)
•  Foreign currency translation  12,692 
•  SEG related production costs  65,963 
•  Other  9,010 
     
•  Cost of goods sold for the year ended September 30, 2007 $728,820 
     
The effect of increased sales volume on cost of goods sold was measured as if these costs increased in direct proportion to the sales volume increase.
 
Costs of goods sold benefited from the effects of Engine Systems’ European consolidation, which we completed in March 2006.
 
Variable compensation paid to members in direct and indirect manufacturing functions was higher in 2007 than in 2006. Each year, a portion of our members’ compensation will vary depending on performance-based factors.
 
Selling, general, and administrative expensesincreased 21%, attributable to the following (in thousands):
 
     
•  SG&A for the year ended September 30, 2006 $92,013 
•  Accruals for legal and arbitration matters  (5,557)
•  SEG related SG&A expenses  11,307 
•  Variable compensation  5,430 
•  SEG integration costs  3,000 
•  Stock-based compensation expense  774 
•  Other  4,330 
     
•  SG&A for the year ended September 30, 2007 $111,297 
     
 
We accrue for individual legal matters that we believe are likely to result in a loss when ultimately resolved using estimates of the most likely amount of loss. More information about contingencies is included under “Commitments and Contingencies” below.
 
Variable compensation paid to members was higher in 2007 than in 2006. Each year, a portion of our members’ compensation will vary depending on performance-based factors.


22


We incurred expenses related to completing the acquisition of SEG including dedicated staffing, travel, and telephone costs.
 
Research and development costsincreased 9%, attributable to the following (in thousands):
 
     
•  Research and development for the year ended September 30, 2006 $59,861 
•  Turbine Systems development activities  (170)
•  Engine Systems development activities  1,544 
•  Electrical Power Systems development activities  (841)
•  SEG development projects  4,900 
     
•  Research and development for the year ended September 30, 2007 $65,294 
     
 
We are makingDuring fiscal year 2007, we made considerable progress on a new diesel pump in Engine Systems, which will power next generation engines being released into the market in the near future. This pump will sustain higher pressures, temperatures, and speeds than previous models. The SEG acquisition, which is included in the Electrical Power Systems segment, added development activities related to power protection and wind inverter technologies.


29


Earnings
             
Year Ended September 30,
 2008  2007  2006 
  (In thousands) 
 
Turbine Systems $116,196  $87,353  $67,584 
Engine Systems  56,471   56,984   40,829 
Electrical Power Systems  42,303   20,294   4,475 
             
Total segment earnings  214,970   164,631   112,888 
Nonsegment expense  (31,346)  (31,720)  (26,052)
Interest expense and income, net  (1,714)  (923)  (2,339)
             
Consolidated earnings before income taxes  181,910   131,988   84,497 
Income tax expense  (60,030)  (33,831)  (14,597)
             
Consolidated net earnings $121,880  $98,157  $69,900 
             
 
20062008 Compared to 20052007
 
Cost of goods soldTurbine Systems segment earningsdecreased 2%increased 33%, attributable to the following (in thousands):
 
     
•  Cost of goods sold for the year ended September 30, 2005 $623,680 
•  Increase in sales volume  8,112 
•  Effects of consolidation of European operations and other  (5,556)
•  Foreign currency translation  (5,559)
•  Changes in inventory reserves  (1,977)
•  Lower variable compensation  (5,056)
•  Lower workforce management costs  (1,300)
•  Other  (81)
     
•  Cost of goods sold for the year ended September 30, 2006 $612,263 
     
     
•  Earnings for the year ended September 30, 2007 $87,353 
•  Volume changes  18,661 
•  Selling price changes  8,726 
•  Sales mix  (5,993)
•  Foreign exchange rate changes  731 
•  Other, net  6,718 
     
•  Earnings for the year ended September 30, 2008 $116,196 
     
 
CostsThe earnings increase in Turbine Systems was principally the result of goods sold benefited fromleverage on modest increases in sales volume over last year, and reflects a stronger mix of OEM aerospace products compared to recent quarters. Sales volume increased due to higher demand for OEM, military, commercial aftermarket, and industrial turbine products. Selling price increases primarily affected spares and components used in the effectsaerospace aftermarket. Turbine Systems also experienced an unfavorable product mix compared to the prior year which negatively impacted earnings, due to greater growth of Engine Systems’ European consolidation, which we completedOEM sales relative to aftermarket sales. Recent program wins and stronger market conditions for our OEM customers have resulted in March 2006.
Variable compensation paidfaster growth to members in direct and indirect manufacturing functions was lower in 2006 than in 2005. Each year, a portion of our members’ compensation will vary depending on performance-based factors.
We incurred cost of goods sold related to workforce management actions that totaled $0.4 million in 2006OEMs as compared to $1.7 millionour aftermarket customers. Our aftermarket pricing catalog is in 2005. TheseGBP while much of our costs were largely attributable to termination benefits for membersare in direct and indirect manufacturing functions.USD. Earnings increased 1% as a result of changes in GBP during fiscal 2008.
 
Selling, general, and administrative expensesEngine Systems segment earningsincreased 15%decreased 1%, attributable to the following (in thousands):
 
     
•  SG&A for the year ended September 30, 2005 $79,858 
•  Accruals for legal matters  8,500 
•  Stock-based compensation expense  2,497 
•  Other  1,158 
     
•  SG&A for the year ended September 30, 2006 $92,013 
     
     
•  Earnings for the year ended September 30, 2007 $56,984 
•  Volume changes  9,240 
•  Selling price changes  3,391 
•  Sales mix  (5,525)
•  Foreign exchange rate changes  562 
•  Increased non-volume related freight and product expediting costs  (4,809)
•  Other, net  (3,372)
     
•  Earnings for the year ended September 30, 2008 $56,471 
     
 
Sales volume increases were primarily in the power generation and marine markets. Selling price increases were across most products to offset increased material costs. Engine Systems also experienced an unfavorable sales mix compared to the prior year. Engine Systems sells, manufactures and purchases product in several foreign currencies including USD, Euro, CNY, Yen, and GBP. The percentage of sales in a particular foreign currency may


30


be significantly different from the percentage of costs incurred in that currency. As a result of Engine Systems’ significant international footprint, changes in foreign currency can have a large impact on its earnings. During fiscal 2008, the changes in foreign currency rates resulted in a 1% net increase in earnings.
The increased freight costs were the result of increased expediting costs associated with supply chain constraints, product line moves, and fuel surcharges related to increased global fuel costs. Global fuel costs have declined significantly since September 30, 2008. Future volatility in fuel costs may impact future earnings results.
Electrical Power Systems segment earningsincreased 108%, attributable to the following (in thousands):
     
Earnings for the year ended September 30, 2007 $20,294 
•  Volume changes  19,118 
•  Selling price changes  1,496 
•  Sales mix  (2,110)
•  Foreign exchange rate changes  5,883 
•  Other, net  (2,378)
     
•  Earnings for the year ended September 30, 2008 $42,303 
     
The improvement in earnings reflects the integration of our acquisition in October 2006 of SEG. Sales volume is higher due to inverter products sold into wind power applications. A change in sales mix and changes in the external market put pressure on margins. Foreign currency translation earnings increased primarily as a result of the change in the Euro against the USD during fiscal 2008. A significant portion of Electrical Power Systems’ sales and many costs are transacted in Euro which is then translated into USD for financial statement purposes. Also, a significant portion of Electrical Power Systems’ product costs are incurred in USD which contributed to increased margins on sales denominated in Euros. During fiscal 2008, the favorable changes in the euro resulted in a 29% net increase in earnings.
Nonsegment expensesdecreased 1% in 2008 as compared to 2007, attributable to the following (in thousands):
     
Nonsegment expenses for the year ended September 30, 2007 $31,720 
•  Accruals for a legal matters and arbitration  (4,376)
•  Stock-based compensation expense  739 
•  Other  3,263 
     
•  Nonsegment expenses for the year ended September 30, 2008 $31,346 
     
Among the other factors affecting nonsegment expenses are normal variations in legal and other professional services. We accrue for individual legal matters that we believe are likely to result in a loss when ultimately resolved using estimates of the most likely amount of loss, including accruals totaling $8.5 million in 2006. Moreloss. For more information about contingencies, is included under “Commitmentssee Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8, Financial Statements and Contingencies” below.Supplementary Financial Data.”


2331


AtIncome taxeswere provided at an effective rate on earnings before income taxes of 33.0% in fiscal 2008 compared to 25.6% in fiscal 2007. The change in the beginning of 2006, we began to account for stock-based compensation using the fair value method of accounting as required under a new accounting standard. We used the intrinsic value method in previous years, under which we did not recognize compensation expense in association with options granted at or above the market price of our common stock at the date of grant. More information about the effect of this accounting change is included under “Share-Based Compensation” above.
Research and development costsincreased 20%effective tax rate was attributable to the following (in thousands)(as a percent of earnings before income taxes):
 
     
•  Research and development for the year ended September 30, 2005 $49,996 
•  Turbine Systems development activities  6,366 
•  Engine Systems development activities  2,886 
•  Electrical Power Systems development activities  613 
     
•  Research and development for the year ended September 30, 2006 $59,861 
     
•  Effective tax rate for the year ended September 30, 200725.6%
•  Adjustments of the beginning-of-year balance of valuation allowances for deferred tax assets(1.5)
•  Change in estimates of taxes for previous periods and audit settlements in 2008 as compared to 20079.0
•  Research credit in 2008 as compared to 20072.1
•  German tax law changes(2.3)
•  Other changes, net0.1
•  Effective tax rate for the year ended September 30, 200833.0%
 
Turbine Systems was developing new aircraft gas turbine engine systemsThe fiscal 2008 change in the beginning-of-year valuation allowances reduced income tax expense by $2.7 million. We establish valuation allowances to reflect the estimated amount of deferred tax assets that might not be realized. Both positive and componentsnegative evidence are considered in forming our judgment as to whether a valuation allowance is appropriate, and more weight is given to evidence that can be objectively verified. Valuation allowances are reassessed whenever there are changes in circumstances that may cause a change in our judgments. In fiscal 2008, additional objective evidence became available regarding earnings in tax jurisdictions that have unexpired net operating loss carryforwards that affected our judgment about the valuation allowance. Income taxes for both commercialfiscal 2008 and military aircraft. Manyfiscal 2007 were affected by changes in estimates of these development programs beganincome taxes for previous years. In both years, the changes were primarily related to settlements and resolutions of income tax matters. These changes reduced the effective tax rate for fiscal 2008 by approximately 1.2% and for fiscal 2007 approximately 10.2% of pretax earnings.
The effective tax rate comparison between fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007 was also affected by the retroactive extension of the tax credit for increasing research activities available in 2005 or earlier and were fully engaged throughout 2006. Most significantly we are developing components and an integrated fuel system for the new GEnx turbofan engine for the Boeing 787, Airbus A350, and Boeing747-8, and components for the General Electric Rolls-Royce F136 engine that is one of two propulsion choices to power Lockheed’s Joint Strike Fighter aircraft, and components for the T700-GE-701D enginefiscal 2007 but not in fiscal 2008. This credit expired on December 31, 2007. Another retroactive extension was approved in October 2008 that will be used to upgradebenefit our effective tax rate in fiscal 2009. Among the Sikorsky Black Hawk and Boeing Apache helicopters, among others.other changes in our effective tax rate were the effects of changes in the relative mix of earnings by tax jurisdiction.
 
We also increased development activities in Engine Systems, most notably in conjunction with customers’ development programs as we work closely with our customers early in their own development and design stages, helping them by developing components and integrated systems that allow them to meet emissions requirements, increase fuel efficiency, and lower their costs. We also continue to develop products for the turbine auxiliary market. Turbine auxiliary applications offer multiple opportunities to leverage our existing hydraulic and electric actuation and valve technologies for off-engine applications.
Curtailment gainrelates to an amount recognized in 2005 for the immediate effects of amendments to one of our retirement healthcare benefit plans. The amendment eliminated retirement healthcare benefits for members that did not attain age 55 and 10 years of service by January 1, 2006.
Interest and other incomedecreased in 2006 from 2005 primarily as a result of the 2005 sale of rights to our aircraft propeller synchronizer products to an unrelated third party, which resulted in a pre-tax gain of $3.8 million.
Earnings
             
In Thousands for the Year Ended September 30,
 2007  2006  2005 
 
Turbine Systems $87,353  $67,584  $63,037 
Engine Systems  56,984   40,829   23,690 
Electrical Power Systems  20,294   4,475   1,921 
             
Total segment earnings  164,631   112,888   88,648 
Non segment expense  (31,720)  (26,052)  (13,710)
Curtailment gain        7,825 
Interest expense, net  (923)  (2,339)  (3,655)
             
Consolidated earnings before income taxes  131,988   84,497   79,108 
Income tax expense  (33,831)  (14,597)  (23,137)
             
Consolidated net earnings $98,157  $69,900  $55,971 
             


24


2007 Compared to 2006
 
Turbine Systems segment earningsincreased 29%, attributable to the following (in thousands):
 
     
•  Earnings for the year ended September 30, 2006 $67,584 
•  Volume changes  15,843 
•  Selling price changes  6,775 
•  Variable compensation  (6,421)
•  Other, net  3,572 
     
•  Earnings for the year ended September 30, 2007 $87,353 
     
 
Sales volume changes are discussed above as part of the discussion of the changes in a previous paragraph.net external sales.
 
Selling price increases primarily affected industrial OEM products and spares and components used in the aerospace aftermarket.
 
Variable compensation paid to Turbine Systems’ members was higher in 2007 than in 2006, driven by performance-based factors.


32


Engine Systems segment earningsincreased 40%, attributable to the following (in thousands):
 
     
•  Earnings for the year ended September 30, 2006 $40,829 
•  Volume changes  10,591 
•  Selling price changes  4,552 
•  Margin changes  5,687 
•  Reduced costs related to 2006 restructuring  2,327 
•  Reduction in other selling, general and administrative expenses, including exchange rate gains/(loss)  1,200 
•  Variable compensation  (4,596)
•  Other  (3,606)
     
•  Earnings for the year ended September 30, 2007 $56,984 
     
 
After flat sales in fiscal 2006, many of Engine System’sSystems’ domestic and international markets began experiencing growth in fiscal 2007. Sales volumes increased alongand were matched with a modest price increase. Improvements in gross margins were the result of productivity gains and a favorable product shipment mix. Quality improvements reduced warranty and scrap expenses. Other selling, general, and administrative expenses decreased due to reduced currency losses associated with Engine Systems’non-U.S. locations.
 
The stronger sales environment, improved margins, and increased profitability resulted in higher performance basedperformance-based variable compensation expenses in fiscal 2007.
 
Electrical Power Systems segment earningsincreased 353%, attributable to the following (in thousands):
 
     
•  Earnings for the year ended September 30, 2006 $4,475 
•  Sales volume  4,769 
•  Improvements in material costs  2,853 
•  Acquisition of SEG  13,041 
•  Variable compensation  (998)
•  Research and development costs, excluding SEG  841 
•  Increase in selling, general and administrative expenses  (1,245)
•  Other  (3,442)
     
•  Earnings for the year ended September 30, 2007 $20,294 
     


25


On October 31, 2006, we acquired 100% of the stock of Schaltanlagen-Elektronik-Geräte GmbH & Co. KG (“SEG”).SEG. SEG had sales of $60approximately $60.0 million in calendar year 2005. This business adds dimension and range to our core technologies and product portfolio for the power generation market, including protection and comprehensive control systems for power distribution applications, and power inverters for wind turbines — areas we have targeted for growth.
 
Nonsegment expensesincreased 22% in 2007 as compared to 2006,, attributable to the following (in thousands):
 
     
•  Nonsegment expenses for the year ended September 30, 2006 $26,052 
•  Accruals for a legal matter  (3,171)
•  Stock-based compensation expense  911 
•  Variable compensation  3,332 
•  Other  4,596 
     
•  Nonsegment expenses for the year ended September 30, 2007 $31,720 
     
 
We accrue for individual legal matters that we believe are likely to result in a loss when ultimately resolved using estimates of the most likely amount of loss. More information about contingencies is included under “Commitments and Contingencies” below.
 
Among the other factors affecting nonsegment expenses are normal variations in legal and other professional services.


33


Income taxeswere provided at an effective rate on earnings before income taxes of 25.6% in fiscal 2007 compared to 17.3% in 2006. The change in the effective tax rate was attributable to the following (as a percent of earnings before income taxes):
 
     
•  Effective tax rate for the year ended September 30, 2006  17.3%
•  Adjustments of the beginning-of-year balance of valuation allowances for deferred tax assets  16.2 
•  Change in estimates of taxes for previous periods and audit settlements in 2007 as compared to 2006  (8.9)
•  Research credit in 2007 as compared to 2006  (1.5)
•  Change in German income tax rate  2.3 
•  Other changes, net  0.2 
     
•  Effective tax rate for the year ended September 30, 2007  25.6%
     
 
The fiscal 2006 change in the beginning-of-year valuation allowances reduced income tax expense by $13.7 million. Exclusive of this item, the effective tax rate for fiscal 2006 was 33.5%. We establish valuation allowances to reflect the estimated amount of deferred tax assets that might not be realized. Both positive and negative evidence are considered in forming our judgment as to whether a valuation allowance is appropriate, and more weight is given to evidence that can be objectively verified. Valuation allowances are reassessed whenever there are changes in circumstances that may cause a change in our judgments. In fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2007, additional objective evidence became available regarding earnings in tax jurisdictions that have unexpired net operating loss carryforwards that affected our judgment about the valuation allowance.
 
Income taxes for both fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006 were affected by changes in estimates of income taxes for previous years. In 2007, the changes were primarily related to the settlement of income tax audits. These changes reduced the effective tax rate for fiscal 2007 by approximately 10.2% of pretax earnings. In fiscal 2006, the changes were primarily related to the favorable resolution of certain tax matters. These changes reduced the effective tax rate for fiscal 2006 by approximately 1.3% of pretax earnings.
 
The effective tax rate comparison between fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006 was also affected by the extension of the tax credit for increasing research activities. This credit expired on December 31, 2005 but was retroactively reinstated in December 2006, and we recognized a benefit to our effective tax rate for fiscal 2007 reflecting the extension.


26


Among the other changes in our effective tax rate were the effects of changes in the amounts of extraterritorial income exclusion and the effects of changes in the relative mix of earnings by tax jurisdiction.
 
2006 Compared to 2005Outlook
 
Turbine Systems segment earningsincreased 7% attributableThe economy over the last several months has been significantly impacted by financial institution credit crises ultimately impacting the broader credit markets and the financing available to many companies, both in the following (in thousands):
     
•  Earnings for the year ended September 30, 2005 $63,037 
•  Volume changes  6,365 
•  Selling price changes  11,750 
•  Higher research and development costs  (7,002)
•  Variable compensation  4,029 
•  Gain of sales of product rights in 2005  (3,834)
•  Other, net  (6,761)
     
•  Earnings for the year ended September 30, 2006 $67,584 
     
U.S. and abroad. More significantly to Woodward, at the moment, the rapid weakening of the Euro and the GBP coupled with our continuing growth in Europe is having a pronounced impact on our outlook for 2009.
 
Sales volume changesPreparation for the impacts of market fluctuations has been a strategic objective for a number of years and Woodward is well positioned to maintain liquidity and relative profitability in the event of potential sales declines. We have been investing more broadly both regionally and across our markets to reduce specific risk with respect to any one economy or market. Our focus on energy control and optimization across a wide range of applications and resources mitigates fluctuations in any one area. Further, our products are discussedkey components of critical infrastructure projects where government funding may supplement private financing. We are focusing on our core competencies to better serve our customers, driving improvements in a previous paragraph.the cash conversion cycle, reducing operating costs in many areas, and have locked in favorable long-term financing.
 
Selling price increases were madeAt this time, our order volumes indicate a modest increase in sales volumes in 2009. However, the significant effects of rapidly weakened European currencies may offset this increase and we now anticipate organic sales to offset certain material cost increases relatedbe flat to price fluctuations of commodities for the production of mechanical, electronic, or electromagnetic components. We also increased selling prices of parts and components sold in the aftermarket.
Variable compensation paid to Turbine Systems’ members was lower driven by performance-based factors.
Turbine Systems’ sold the rights to its propeller synchronizer products to an unrelated third party in 2005.
Other factors affecting Turbine Systems’ segment earnings included the material cost increases referred to in an earlier paragraph.
Engine Systems segment earningsincreased 72% attributable to the following (in thousands):
     
•  Earnings for the year ended September 30, 2005 $23,690 
•  Volume changes  (297)
•  Selling price changes  8,667 
•  Margin changes  2,848 
•  Effects of the consolidation of European operations and other  3,785 
•  Workforce management charges  1,710 
•  Variable compensation  2,858 
•  Research and development costs  (2,432)
     
•  Earnings for the year ended September 30, 2006 $40,829 
     
Sales volumes were flat as a result of slowed market activity. Margin improvements came from a favorable product shipment mix and productivity improvements. During fiscal 2006, Engine Systems benefited from the fiscal 2005 restructuring and consolidation of the European operations through lower operational spending. Variable compensation paid to Engine Systems’ members was lower driven by performance-based factors.
Electrical Power Systems segment earningsincreased 133% attributable to the following (in thousands):
     
•  Earnings for the year ended September 30, 2005 $1,921 
•  Volume changes  2,312 
•  Variable compensation  623 
•  Research and development costs  714 
•  Other  (1,095)
     
•  Earnings for the year ended September 30, 2006 $4,475 
     
slightly up.


2734


Increases in sales was primarily driven by increased demand for distributed power applications.
Nonsegment expensesincreased 90% in 2006 as compared to 2005, attributable to the following (in thousands):
     
•  Nonsegment expenses for the year ended September 30, 2005 $13,710 
•  Accruals for a legal matter  8,500 
•  Stock-based compensation expense  2,942 
•  Other  900 
     
•  Nonsegment expenses for the year ended September 30, 2006 $26,052 
     
We accrue for individual legal matters that we believe are likely to result in a loss when ultimately resolved using estimates of the most likely amount of loss, including accruals totaling $8.5 million in 2006. More information about contingencies is included under “Commitments and Contingencies” below.
At the beginning of 2006, we began to account for stock-based compensation using the fair value method of accounting as required under a new accounting standard. We used the intrinsic value method in previous years, under which we did not recognize compensation expense in association with options granted at or above the market price of our common stock at the date of grant. More information about the effect of this accounting change is included under “Share-Based Compensation” above.
Among the other factors affecting nonsegment expenses are normal variations in legal and other professional services.
Curtailment gainwas discussed previously as part of costs and expenses.
Income taxeswere provided at an effective rate on earnings before income taxes of 17.3% in 2006 compared to 29.2% in 2005. The change in the effective tax rate was attributable to the following (as a percent of earnings before income taxes):
•  Effective tax rate for the year ended September 30, 200529.2%
•  Adjustments of the beginning-of-year balance of valuation allowances for deferred tax assets(16.2)
•  Change in estimates of taxes for previous periods and audit settlements in 2006 as compared to 20051.2
•  Research credit in 2006 as compared to 20050.8
•  Other changes, net2.3
•  Effective tax rate for the year ended September 30, 200617.3%
The 2006 change in the beginning-of-year valuation allowances reduced income tax expense by $13.7 million. Exclusive of this item, the effective tax rate for 2006 was 33.5%. We establish valuation allowances to reflect the estimated amount of deferred tax assets that might not be realized. Both positive and negative evidence are considered in forming our judgment as to whether a valuation allowance is appropriate, and more weight is given to evidence that can be objectively verified. Valuation allowances are reassessed whenever there are changes in circumstances that may cause a change in our judgments. In 2006, additional objective evidence became available regarding earnings in tax jurisdictions that have unexpired net operating loss carryforwards that affected our judgment about the valuation allowance.
Income taxes for both 2006 and 2005 were affected by changes in estimates of income taxes for previous years. In 2006, the changes were primarily related to the favorable resolution of certain tax matters. These changes reduced the effective tax rate for 2006 by approximately 1.3% of pretax earnings. In 2005, the changes in estimates were related to increases in the amount of certain credits claimed and changes in the amount of certain deductions taken as compared to prior estimates. These changes reduced reported income taxes by $1.9 million in 2005, or approximately 2.5% of pretax earnings.


28


The effective tax rate comparison between 2006 and 2005 was affected by the expiration of the tax credit for increasing research activities, which expired on December 31, 2005.
Among the other changes in our effective tax rate were the effects of changes in the amounts of extraterritorial income exclusion and the effects of changes in the relative mix of earnings by tax jurisdiction, which affects the comparison of foreign and state income tax rates relative to the United States federal statutory rate.
Outlook
We believe the strength in our end markets will continue to hold through 2008 and our efforts to improve our overall cost structure will deliver enhanced margins as well as deliver improved profitability. We expect Woodward to grow at a faster pace than the overall market in aircraft engines, and both wind and electrical power. In engine markets, we are partnered with strong players in the industry and expect to grow with them at market rates.
FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY, AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
 
Assets
 
                
In Thousands at September 30,
 2007 2006 
(In Thousands) at September 30,
 2008 2007 
Turbine Systems $330,969  $317,688  $371,275  $330,969 
Engine Systems  250,908   231,485   242,350   250,908 
Electrical Power Systems  109,674   40,672   133,928   109,674 
Non segment assets  138,216   145,652 
Nonsegment assets  179,464   138,216 
          
Consolidated total assets $829,767  $735,497  $927,017  $829,767 
          
 
Turbine Systems segment assetsincreased primarily due to increases in accounts receivable and inventory in response to increases in sales volume. In addition, property, plant, and equipment increased due to equipment purchases and the modernization of the segment’s largest manufacturing facility. We plan to begin construction of a state-of-the-art test facility for aircraft engine fuel and control systems in Rockford, Illinois, on which we expect to invest approximately $25.0 million within the next two years.
 
Engine Systems segment assetsincreaseddecreased primarily due to increasesdecreases in accounts receivable, property, plant and equipment, and intangible assets. Accounts receivable decreased as a result of an improvement in the management of accounts receivable. The decreases in property, plant, and equipment and intangible assets were due to normal depreciation and amortization, as well as transfer of certain assets to other segments or nonsegment use. These decreases were offset by an increase in inventory in response to increases in sales volume.
 
Electrical Power Systems segment assetsincreased primarily as a result of the business acquisition, discussed above.increases in accounts receivable and inventory in response to increases in sales volume and purchases of property, plant, and equipment.
 
Nonsegment assetsdecreasedincreased primarily because of a decreasean increase in cash and cash equivalents related to the business acquisition andincreases in sales volume offset by the repurchase of common stock. Changes in cash are discussed more fully in a separate section of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis.
 
Other Balance Sheet Measures
 
                
In Thousands at September 30,
 2007 2006 
(In Thousands) at September 30,
 2008 2007 
Working capital $275,611  $260,243  $369,211  $275,611 
Long-term debt, less current portion  45,150   58,379   33,337   45,150 
Other liabilities  57,404   71,190   67,695   57,404 
Shareholders’ equity  544,431   478,689 
Stockholders’ equity  629,628   544,431 
 
Working capital(current assets less current liabilities) increased at September 30, 20072008 from September 30, 20062007 primarily as a result of an increase in sales volume which led to an increase in inventories and accounts receivable, and a decrease in short-term borrowings, partially offset by an increase in short-term borrowings, accounts payable and accrued liabilities.
As discussed in Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8 — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” on October 1, 2008, we completed the acquisition of MPC in a transaction valued at approximately $383.0 million.
On October 6, 2008, we completed the acquisition of the outstanding capital stock of MotoTron and the intellectual property assets owned by its parent company, Brunswick Corporation, that are used in connection with the MotoTron business for approximately $17.0 million.
The October 2008 acquisitions of MPC and MotoTron, including the repayment of certain obligations associated with these acquisitions, were primarily financed with a total of $400.0 million of debt issued on October 1, 2008 and October 30, 2008, as discussed below.
 
Long-term debt, less current portiondecreased as a result of payments made during the period. As of September 30, 2007,2008, we had a revolving line of credit facility with a syndicate of U.S. banks totaling $100$225.0 million,


35


with an option to increase the amount of the line to $175.0$350.0 million. In addition, we have other line of credit facilities, which totaled $25.4 million and $17.7 million at September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, that are generally reviewed annually for renewal.renewal, which totaled $19.9 million at both September 30, 2008 and 2007.
Also, we have additional short-term borrowing capabilities tied to net amounts on deposit at certain foreign financial institutions under which $4.0 million had been advanced as of September 30, 2008 and $5.5 million had been advanced as of September 30, 2007. The total amount of borrowings under all facilities was $5.5 million and $0.5$4.0 million at September 30, 20072008 and 2006, respectively.$5.5 million at September 30, 2007. The weighted-average interest rate for outstanding borrowings under these line of credit facilities, which were in Japan at rates significantly lower than those typical in the United States,U.S., was 3.8%3.0% September 30, 2008 and 0.5%3.8% at September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.


29


On October 25, 2007, we entered into a Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, Wachovia Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Deutsche Bank Securities. This agreement increases the initial commitment from $100.0 million to $225.0 million and also increases the option to expand the commitment from $75.0 million to $125.0 million, for a total of $350.0 million. The agreement generally bears interest at LIBOR plus 41 basis points to 80 basis points and expires in October 2012. The increased borrowing capacity provides additional flexibility with respect to our overall capital structure.2007.
 
Provisions of debt agreements include covenants customary to such agreements that require us to maintain specified minimum or maximum financial measures and place limitations on various investing and financing activities. The agreements also permit the lenders to accelerate repayment requirements in the event of a material adverse event. Our most restrictive covenants require us to maintain a minimum consolidated net worth, a maximum consolidated debt to consolidated operating cash flow ratio, and a maximum consolidated debt to earnings before income taxes, depreciation, and amortization (“EBITDA”) ratio, as defined in the agreements. We were in compliance with all covenants at September 30, 2007.2008.
Term Loan Credit Agreement
As discussed in Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8 — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” On October 1, 2008, we entered into a Term Loan Credit Agreement (the “Term Loan Credit Agreement”). The Term Loan Credit Agreement provides for a $150.0 million unsecured term loan facility, and may be expanded by up to $50.0 million of additional indebtedness from time to time, subject to the our compliance with certain conditions and the lenders’ participation. The Term Loan Credit Agreement generally bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.00% to 2.25%, requires quarterly principal payments of $1,875 beginning in March, 2009, and matures in October 2013.
The Term Loan Credit Agreement contains customary terms and conditions, including, among others, covenants that place limits on our ability to incur liens on assets, incur additional debt (including a leverage or coverage based maintenance test), transfer or sell our assets, merge or consolidate with other persons, make capital expenditures, make certain investments, make certain restricted payments and enter into material transactions with affiliates. The Term Loan Credit Agreement contains financial covenants requiring that (a) our ratio of consolidated net debt to EBITDA not exceed 3.5 to 1.0 and (b) we have a minimum consolidated net worth of $400.0 million plus 50% of net income for any fiscal year and 50% of the net proceeds of certain issuances of capital stock, in each case on a rolling four quarter basis. The Term Loan Credit Agreement also contains events of default customary for such financings, the occurrence of which would permit the lenders to accelerate the amounts due.
Our obligations under the Term Loan Credit Agreement are guaranteed by Woodward FST, Inc., our wholly owned subsidiary (“Woodward FST”).
A portion of the proceeds from the Term Loan Credit Agreement was used to finance the MPC acquisition.
Note Purchase Agreement
On October 1, 2008, we entered into a Note Purchase Agreement (the “Note Purchase Agreement”) relating to the sale by Woodward of an aggregate principal amount of $250.0 million comprised of (a) $100.0 million aggregate principal amount of Series B Senior Notes due October 1, 2013 (the “Series B Notes”), (b) $50.0 million aggregate principal amount of Series C Senior Notes due October 1, 2015 (the “Series C Notes”) and (c) $100.0 million aggregate principal amount of Series D Senior Notes due October 1, 2018 (the “Series D Notes” and, together with the Series B Notes and Series C Notes, the “Notes”) in a series of private placement transactions. On October 1, 2008, $200.0 million aggregate principal amount of Notes were sold, comprised of $80.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Series B Notes, $40.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Series C Notes and $80.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Series D Notes. In connection with the Note Purchase Agreement entered into on October 1, 2008, we issued an additional $50.0 million aggregate principal amount of Notes with


36


similar maturities and interest rates on October 30, 2008. The Notes issued in the private placement have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and may not be offered or sold in the U.S. absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration requirements.
The Series B Notes have a maturity date of October 1, 2013 and generally bear interest at a rate of 5.63% per annum. The Series C Notes have a maturity date of October 1, 2015 and generally bear interest at a rate of 5.92% per annum. The Series D Notes have a maturity date of October 1, 2018 and generally bear interest at a rate of 6.39% per annum. Under certain circumstances, the interest rate on each series of Notes is subject to increase if our leverage ratio of consolidated net debt to consolidated EBITDA increases beyond 3.5 to 1.0. Interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually on April 1 and October 1 of each year until all principal is paid. Interest payments commence on April 1, 2009.
Our obligations under the Note Purchase Agreement and the Notes rank equal in right of payment with all of our other unsecured unsubordinated debt, including our outstanding debt under the Term Loan Credit Agreement.
The Note Purchase Agreement contains restrictive covenants customary for such financings, including, among other things, covenants that place limits on our ability to incur liens on assets, incur additional debt (including a leverage or coverage based maintenance test), transfer or sell our assets, merge or consolidate with other persons, and enter into material transactions with affiliates. The Note Purchase Agreement also contains events of default customary for such financings, the occurrence of which would permit the Purchasers of the Notes to accelerate the amounts due.
The Note Purchase Agreement contains financial covenants requiring that our (a) ratio of consolidated net debt to consolidated EBITDA not exceed 4.0 to 1.0 during any material acquisition period, or 3.5 to 1.0 at any other time on a rolling four quarter basis, and (b) consolidated net worth at any time equal or exceed $425.0 million plus 50% of consolidated net earnings for each fiscal year beginning with the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008. Additionally, under the Note Purchase Agreement, we may not permit the aggregate amount of priority debt to at any time exceed 20% of our consolidated net worth at the end of the then most recently ended fiscal quarter.
We are permitted at any time, at our option, to prepay all — any part of — the then outstanding principal amount of any series of the Notes at 100% of the principal amount of the series of Notes to be prepaid (but, in the case of partial prepayment, not less than $1.0 million), together with interest accrued on such amount to be prepaid to the date of payment, plus any applicable make-whole amount. The make-whole amount is computed by discounting the remaining scheduled payments of interest and principal of the Notes being prepaid at a discount rate equal to the sum of 50 basis points and the yield to maturity of U.S. treasury securities having a maturity equal to the remaining average life of the Notes being prepaid.
A portion of the proceeds from the issuance of the Notes was used to finance the MPC acquisition.
 
Commitments and contingenciesat September 30, 2007,2008, include various matters arising from the normal course of business. We are currently involvedSee previous discussion in pending or threatened litigation or other legal proceedings regarding employment, product liability,Item 3. “Legal Proceedings” and contractual matters arising from the normal course of business. We accrue for individual matters that we believe are likely to result in a loss when ultimately resolved using estimates of the most likely amount of loss. There are also individual matters with respect to which we believe the likelihood of a loss when ultimately resolved is less than likely but more than remote, which are not accrued. While it is possible that there could be additional losses that have not been accrued, we currently believe the possible additional loss in the event of an unfavorable resolution of each matter is less than $10.0 million in the aggregate.
Among the legal proceedings referred to in the preceding paragraph, we previously accrued $9.5 million for a class action lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for Northern District of Illinois regarding alleged discrimination on the basis of race, national origin, and gender at our Winnebago County, Illinois, facilities, most of which was accrued during fiscal 2006. On April 17, 2007, a U.S. District Court Judge granted final approval of a Consent Decree that included a $5.0 million settlement of the class action and EEOC matters with the balance of the previously accrued amount relating to legal and other associated expenses, all of which were paid during this fiscal year. We do not expect to incur any additional settlement or legal expenses related to this matter.
In addition, on April 30, 2007, we were notified of an adverse arbitration ruling on a matter that was initiated by us and outstanding since 2002. As a result of the ruling, we incurred a pre-tax loss in our second fiscal quarter of $4.0 million in relationNote 18 to the arbitration finding.
We file income tax returnsConsolidated Financial Statements in various jurisdictions worldwide, which are subject to audit. We have accrued for our estimate of the most likely amount of expenses that we believe will result from income tax audit adjustments.
We do not recognize contingencies that might result in a gain until such contingencies are resolvedItem 8 — “Financial Statements and the related amounts are realized.
In the event of a change in control of the company, we may be required to pay termination benefits to certain executive officers.Supplementary Data.”
 
Shareholders’Stockholders’ equityat September 30, 2007,2008, increased 14%16% over the prior fiscal year. Increases due to net earnings, sales of treasury stock, and income tax benefits from the exercise of stock options by employees and the impact of implementation of SFAS 158, during fiscal 20072008 were partially offset by cash dividend payments and purchases of treasury stock.
On January 26, 2005, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $30.0 million of our outstanding shares of common stock on the open market and private transactions over a three-year period. This authorization was terminated on July 25, 2006, concurrent with the approval of a new stock repurchase plan, which authorized the repurchase of up to $50 million of our outstanding shares of common stock on the open market and private transactions over a three-year period that will end on July 25, 2009.
 
In July 2006, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $50.0 million of our outstanding shares of common stock on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions over a three-year period (the “2006 Authorization”). During fiscal year 2007, we purchased a total of $38.6 million of our common stock under the 2006 Authorization. Pursuant to the 2006 Authorization, in August 2007, we entered into an agreement with J.P. Morgan


30


Chase Bank whereby we purchased 453,524approximately 989,000 common stock shares in exchange for $31.1 million. Under the accelerated stock repurchase agreement, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank is to purchasemillion at an equivalent number of our common shares in the open market over a period of up to four months, and at the end of that period, additional shares may be delivered to or by us based on the volume-weighted average price of our$31.47 per common shares during the same period, subject to a cap and a floor as determined according to the terms of agreement. 75,000 common shares have been held back from the repurchase to allow for net share settlement, if required.share. This arrangement with J.P. Morgan Chase Bank completed the stock repurchase program previously authorized in July 2006.
 
During September 2007, the Board of Directors authorized a new stock repurchase of up to $200.0 million of our outstanding shares of common stock on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions over a three-year period that will end in October 2010.2010 (the “2007 Authorization”).


37


During 2007 and 2006,fiscal 2008, we purchased $38.6 million and $21.5a total of $31.9 million of our common stock under these authorizations, respectively, as follows (in thousands except share price):
             
  Purchase
  Number
  Average Price
 
  Price  of Shares  Per Share 
 
Shares purchased under the July 25, 2006 authorization during fiscal 2007 $38,649   651  $59.35 
             
Shares purchased under the January 26, 2005 authorization $14,566   452  $32.25 
Shares purchased under the July 25, 2006 authorization  6,936   221  $31.34 
             
Shares purchased during fiscal 2006 $21,502   673  $31.95 
             
the 2007 Authorization at an average price of $29.94 per share. A three-for-onetwo-for-one stock split was approved by shareholdersstockholders at the 20052007 annual meeting of shareholdersstockholders on January 25, 2006.23, 2008. This stock split became effective for shareholdersstockholders at the close of business on February 1, 2006.2008. The effects of the stock split are reflected in the financial statements filed as part of thisForm 10-K. In addition, in accordance with stock option plan provisions, the terms of all outstanding stock option awards were proportionately adjusted.
 
Contractual ObligationsCash Flows
 
                         
In Thousands for the Year Ending September 30,
 2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  Thereafter 
 
Long-term debt principal $15,940  $11,383  $11,201  $11,068  $10,881  $ 
Interest on debt obligations  3,420   2,534   1,800   1,072   354    
Operating leases  4,000   3,100   2,500   2,200   1,700   2,100 
Purchase obligations  116,360   1,570   609   7   1    
                         
Total $139,720  $18,587  $16,110  $14,347  $12,936  $2,100 
                         
             
Year Ended September 30,
 
2008
  2007  2006 
  (In thousands) 
 
Net cash provided by operating activities $125,354  $117,718  $80,536 
Net cash used in investing activities  (35,909)  (67,048)  (31,015)
Net cash used in financing activities  (48,904)  (66,496)  (51,433)
Effect of exchange rate on changes  (2,343)  3,743   1,033 
             
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  38,198   (12,083)  (879)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year  71,635   83,718   84,597 
             
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year $109,833  $71,635  $83,718 
             
 
Interest obligations on floating rate debt instruments are calculated for future periods using interest rates in effect at the end of 2007. See Note 102008 Compared to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further details on our long-term debt.2007
 
The preceding table reflects contractual obligations at September 30,Net cash flows provided by operating activitiesincreased by $7.6 million compared to fiscal 2007, but excludesprimarily due to an increase in net earnings and collections of income tax refunds, partially offset by an increase in working capital to support our retirement pension and retirement healthcare obligations. Our contributionsgrowing business.
Net cash flows used in investing activitiesdecreased by $31.1 million compared to retirement pension benefit plans totaled $8.7 million infiscal 2007, and $3.3 million in 2006, and we currently expect our contributions for 2008 will total approximately $2.9 million. Pension contributions in future years will varyprimarily as a result of a number of factors, including actual plan asset returns and interest rates.business acquisition during fiscal 2007.
 
Our contributions to retirement healthcare benefit plans totaled $3.3Capital expenditures increased by $9.1 million in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007. We are currently planning to begin construction of a state-of-the-art test facility for aircraft engine fuel and control systems in Rockford, Illinois. We expect to invest approximately $25.0 million for this test facility within the next two years, approximately $9.0 million to modernize and upgrade other Rockford facilities, and the balance for various other projects including systems test capability expansions in Colorado and a new facility in Poland. We continue to support our advanced test facilities and core manufacturing process improvements.
Increases in capital expenditures are expected to be funded through cash flows from operations and available revolving lines of credit.
Net cash flows used in financing activitiesdecreased by $17.6 million from fiscal 2007, and $3.0 million in 2006, and we currently estimate our contributions for 2008 will total approximately $3.3 million, less the amount of federal subsidies associated with our prescription drug benefits that we receive. Retirement healthcare contributions are made on a “pay-as-you-go” basis as payments are made to healthcare providers, and such contributions will varyprimarily as a result of changesreduced repurchases of treasury stock in the future cost of healthcarefiscal 2008 and increases in excess tax benefits provided for covered retirees.from stock compensation compared to fiscal 2007.
 
More information about our retirement benefit obligationsOverall, cash and cash equivalents increased by $38.2 million during fiscal 2008 to $109.8 million at year end. We believe cash on hand and available short-term borrowings at year end should continue to provide us with significant liquidity to fund on-going operations. The debt to total capitalization ratio was 7.2% as of September 30, 2008, compared to 10.9% as of September 30, 2007. Share purchases of treasury stock totaled to $39.8 million in fiscal 2008 and $51.0 million in fiscal 2007. The balance remaining at September 30, 2008 on the September 2007 authorization is included in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8 — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”


31


We enter into purchase obligations with suppliers in the normal course of business, on a short-term basis.
Cash Flows
             
In Thousands for the Year Ended September 30,
 2007  2006  2005 
 
Net cash provided by operating activities $117,718  $80,536  $69,432 
Net cash used in investing activities  (67,048)  (31,015)  (22,909)
Net cash used in financing activities  (66,496)  (51,433)  (10,503)
$168.1 million.
 
2007 Compared to 2006
 
Net cash flows provided by operating activitiesincreased by $37.2 million during fiscal 2007 as compared to fiscal 2006 primarily due to an increase in net earnings and deferred income taxes, partially offset by an increase in working capital.


38


Net cash flows used in investing activitiesincreased by $36.0 million during fiscal 2007 as compared to fiscal 2006 primarily as a result of a business acquisition.
 
Net cash flows used in financing activitiesincreased by $15.1 million during fiscal 2007 as compared to fiscal 2006 primarily as a result of increased sales of treasury stock, an increase in the purchase of treasury stock and payments on our borrowing under the revolving lines of credit.credit, partially offset by increased sales of treasury stock. In August 2007, the Company entered into an accelerated stock repurchase agreement. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8 — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for further discussion.
 
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
Contractual Obligations
A summary of our consolidated contractual obligations and commitments as of September 30, 2008 is as follows:
                         
Year Ending September 30,
 2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  Thereafter 
  (In thousands) 
 
Long-term debt principal $11,377  $11,197  $11,064  $10,878  $  $ 
Interest on debt obligations  2,473   1,755   1,047   347       
Operating leases  4,400   3,800   3,100   2,900   2,500   3,100 
Rebates  3,000   3,000   1,200          
Purchase obligations  132,997   2,222             
Other  530               22,046 
                         
Total $154,777  $21,974  $16,411  $14,125  $2,500  $25,146 
                         
Purchase obligations include amounts committed under legally enforceable contracts or purchase orders for goods and services with defined terms as to price, quantity, delivery, and termination liability.
Interest obligations on floating rate debt instruments are calculated for future periods using interest rates in effect at the end of fiscal 2008. See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8 — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for further details on our long-term debt.
Rebates reflect contractually required payments to customers, which may be subsequently recovered, and exclude payments of future rebate obligations to customers that will likely be paid in connection with future sales activity.
The other obligations amount represents our best reasonable estimate for uncertain tax positions at this time and may change in future periods, as the timing of the payments and whether such payments will actually be required cannot be reasonable estimated.
The above table does not reflect the following items:
• Contributions to our retirement pension benefit plans which we estimate will total approximately $2.4 million in 2009. Pension contributions in future years will vary as a result of a number of factors, including actual plan asset returns and interest rates.
• Contributions to our healthcare benefit plans which we estimate will total $2.8 million in 2009, less the amount of federal subsidies associated with our prescription drug benefits that we receive estimated to be $0.5 million. Retirement healthcare contributions are made on a “pay-as-you-go” basis as payments are made to healthcare providers, and such contributions will vary as a result of changes in the future cost of healthcare benefits provided for covered retirees.
Guarantees and letters of credit totaling approximately $8.2 million were outstanding as of September 30, 2008, some of which were secured by cash and cash equivalents at financial institutions or by Woodward line of credit facilities.


39


As discussed in Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8 — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” an aggregate $400.0 million of additional debt was issued on October 1, 2008 and October 30, 2008, a substantial portion of which was used to finance the MPC acquisition. Scheduled future principal payments on the $400.0 million of debt issued in October 2008, and associated interest expense, estimated based on rates in effect at October 31, 2008, are as follows (in thousands):
         
Year Ending September 30,
 Principal  Interest 
 
2009 $5,625  $23,078 
2010  7,500   22,949 
2011  7,500   22,527 
2012  7,500   22,125 
2013  7,500   21,682 
Thereafter  364,375   37,888 
         
Total $400,000   150,249 
         
2006 Compared to 2005Recently Adopted and Issued But Not Yet Effective Accounting Standards
A. Accounting changes and recently adopted accounting standards:
Income taxes
 
Net cash flows providedFIN 48:  In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Financial Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”) which provides guidance on the financial statement recognition, measurement, reporting, and disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits, either permanent or temporary, should be recorded in the financial statements. For those tax benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by operating activitiesincreased $11.1 million. Cash receiptsthe taxing authorities. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
Woodward adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on October 1, 2007, as required. The change in measurement criteria caused Woodward to recognize a decrease in the retained earnings component of stockholders’ equity of $7,702. For additional information, see Note 4, “Income Taxes” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 — “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
B. Issued but not yet effective accounting standards:
SFAS 157:  In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and requires additional disclosures about a Company’s financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value. SFAS 157 does not change existing guidance on whether or not an instrument is carried at fair value. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”)No. FAS 157-1, “Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13” (“FSPFAS 157-1”) which excludes SFAS No. 13, “Accounting for Leases” and certain other accounting pronouncements that address fair value measurements, from customersthe scope of SFAS 157. In February 2008, the FASB issued FSPNo. FAS 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157” (“FSPFAS 157-2”) which provides a one-year delayed application of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and cash paymentsliabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). We are required to suppliersadopt SFAS 157 as amended by FSPFAS 157-1 and employees increased proportionatelyFSPFAS 157-2 on October 1, 2008, the beginning of fiscal 2009. The adoption is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FSPNo. FAS 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset in a Market That Is Not Active” (“FSPFAS 157-3”), which clarifies the application of SFAS 157 when the market for a


40


financial asset is inactive. Specifically, FSPFAS 157-3 clarifies how (1) management’s internal assumptions should be considered in measuring fair value when observable data are not present, (2) observable market information from an inactive market should be taken into account, and (3) the use of broker quotes or pricing services should be considered in assessing the relevance of observable and unobservable data to measure fair value. The guidance in FSPFAS 157-3 is effective immediately and will apply to us upon adoption of SFAS 157.
SFAS 159:  In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 is expected to expand the use of fair value accounting but does not affect existing standards which require certain assets or liabilities to be carried at fair value. The objective of SFAS 159 is to improve financial reporting by providing companies with the overall increaseopportunity to mitigate volatility in sales.reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. Under SFAS 159, a company may choose, at specified election dates, to measure eligible items at fair value and report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. SFAS 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. As a result, net cash flows were higherSFAS 159 is effective for us in 2006 thanthe first quarter of fiscal 2009. We do not plan to apply SFAS 159.
EITF 07-3:  In June 2007, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) issuedEITF 07-3, “Accounting for Nonrefundable Advance Payments for Goods or Services to Be Used in 2005 becauseFuture Research and Development Activities”(“EITF 07-3”).EITF 07-3 addresses the diversity that exists with respect to the accounting for the non-refundable portion of a payment made by a research and development entity for future research and development activities. The EITF concluded that an entity must defer and capitalize non-refundable advance payments made for research and development activities, and expense these amounts as the related goods are delivered or the related services are performed.EITF 07-3 is effective for interim or annual reporting periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007 (fiscal 2009 for us). We do not expect the adoption ofEITF 07-03 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
EITF 07-1:  In November 2007, the EITF issuedEITF 07-1, “Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements”(“EITF 07-1”).EITF 07-1, which will be applied retrospectively, requires expanded disclosures for contractual arrangements with third parties that involve joint operating activities and may require reclassifications to previously issued financial statements.EITF 07-1 is effective for interim or annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2008 (fiscal 2010 for us). We are currently evaluating the impactEITF 07-1 may have on our consolidated financial statements.
SFAS 141(R):  In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (Revised) “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141(R)”). SFAS 141(R) is intended to improve, simplify, and converge internationally the accounting for business combinations. Under SFAS 141(R), an acquiring entity in a business combination must recognize the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquired entity at the acquisition date fair values, with limited exceptions. In addition, SFAS 141(R) requires the acquirer to disclose all information that investors and other users need to evaluate and understand the nature and financial impact of the operatingbusiness combination. SFAS 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. Accordingly, we will record and disclose business combinations under the revised standard beginning October 1, 2009.
SFAS 160:  In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an Amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) 51,” (“SFAS 160”). This statement amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest (minority interest) in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards that require (i) noncontrolling interests to be reported as a component of equity, (ii) changes in a parent’s ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling interest be accounted for as equity transactions, and (iii) any retained noncontrolling equity investment upon the deconsolidation of a subsidiary be initially measured at fair value. SFAS 160 is to be applied prospectively to business combinations consummated on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period on or after December 15, 2008. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning


41


after December 15, 2008. As a result, SFAS 160 is effective for us in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. We are currently evaluating the impact SFAS 160 may have on our consolidated financial statements.
SFAS 161:  In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 is intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. The new standard is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008 (fiscal 2010 for us). We are currently assessing the impact that SFAS 161 may have on our consolidated financial statements.
FSPFAS 142-3:  In April 2008, the FASB issued FSPNo. FAS 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (“FSPFAS 142-3”), which improves the consistency of the useful life of a recognized intangible asset among various pronouncements. FSPFAS 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 (fiscal 2010 for us). We are currently assessing the impact that FSPFAS 142-3 may have on consolidated financial statements.
SFAS 162:  In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (“SFAS 162”). The new standard is intended to improve financial reporting by identifying a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements that are presented in conformity with U.S. GAAP for nongovernmental entities. The new standard is effective 60 days following the Security and Exchange Commission’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” We are currently assessing the impact that SFAS 162 may have on our consolidated financial statements.
FSPEITF 03-6-1:  In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff PositionNo. EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Stock-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities” (“FSPEITF 03-6-1”). The FSP addresses whether instruments granted in stock-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings generatedallocation in computing earnings per share under the two-class method described in paragraphs 60 and 61 of SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share.” The new FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and interim periods within those years (fiscal 2010 for us). Early application is not permitted. Our unvested options are not eligible to receive dividends; therefore, FSPEITF 03-06-1 will not have any impact on sales.our consolidated financial statements.
FSPFAS 133-1:  In addition, income tax payments September 2008, the FASB issued FSPNo. FAS 133-1 “Disclosures about Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees: An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (“FSPFAS 133-1”) and FASB Interpretation No. 45; and Clarification of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 161.” This FSP amends SFAS No. 133 to require disclosures by sellers of credit derivatives, including credit derivatives embedded in a hybrid instrument. This FSP also amends FIN No. 45 to require an additional disclosure about the current status of the payment/performance risk of a guarantee. Further, this FSP clarifies the FASB’s intent about the effective date of SFAS No. 161. This FSP is effective for 2006 were lower than 2005.fiscal years ending after November 15, 2008. We expect to adopt this FSP for periods ending on and after December 31, 2008. We are currently assessing the impact that FSPFAS 133-1 may have on our consolidated financial statements.
 
Net cash flows used in investing activitiesincreased by $8.1 million. This reflected an increase in capital expenditures of $5.1 million and a decrease in proceeds from the sales of property, plant, and equipment. Turbine Systems accounted for most of the increase in capital expenditures, which related to equipment and facility upgrades. Proceeds from the sale of property, plant, and equipment were higher in 2005 than in 2006 because of sales related to the consolidation of our European facilities.
Net cash flows used in financing activitiesincreased by $40.9 million. Net payments of borrowings were $22.5 million in 2006, compared to net proceeds from borrowings of $2.0 million in 2005. In addition, we increased the amount of cash used for the purchase of our common stock by $15.0 million in 2006 over 2005 and increased cash dividends by $1.9 million.
OutlookRecent Market Events
 
Future cash flows fromCurrent market conditions and economic events have significantly impacted the financial condition, liquidity and outlook for a wide range of companies, including many companies outside the financial services sectors. We have considered the potential impact of such conditions and events as it relates to currently reported financial results of operations and available revolving linesliquidity, including consideration of the possible impact of other than temporary impairment, auction rate securities, and counterparty credit risk and hedge accounting. We do not believe that current market conditions and economic events have significantly impacted our results of operations or current liquidity, nor do we believe that, based on our current investment policies and contractual relationships, we are expectedsubject to be adequategreater risk from such factors than applies to meet our cash requirements over the next twelve months.other companies of similar size and market breadth.


42


Financing Arrangements
 
Payments on our senior notes outstanding as of September 30, 2008, totaling $53.6$44.5 million, are due over thefrom fiscal 2009 through fiscal 2012. Payments on our senior notes issued on October 1 and October 30, 2008 - 2012 timeframe.are due in fiscal 2009 through fiscal 2019. Also, we have a $225.0 million line of credit facility that includes an option to increase the amount of the line up to $350.0 million, subject to our compliance with certain conditions and the participation of the lenders that does not expire until October 2012. Despite these factors, it
As described in Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8 — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” we entered into a Term Loan Credit Agreement on October 1, 2008 that provides for a $150.0 million unsecured term loan facility, and may be expanded by up to $50.0 million of additional indebtedness, subject to our compliance with certain conditions and the participation of the lenders. On October 1, 2008, we also entered into a Note Purchase Agreement relating to our sale of an aggregate principal amount of $250.0 million comprised of (a) $100.0 million aggregate principal amount of Series B Notes due October 1, 2013, (b) $50.0 million aggregate principal amount of Series C Notes due October 1, 2015 and (c) $100.0 million aggregate principal amount of Series D Notes due October 1, 2018. On October 1, 2008, $200.0 million aggregate principal amount of Notes were sold, comprised of $80.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Series B Notes, $40.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Series C Notes, and $80.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Series D Notes. On October 30, 2008, we issued an additional $50.0 million aggregate principal amount of Notes with similar maturities and interest rates.
It is possible that business acquisitions could be made in the future that would require amendments to existing debt agreements and the need to obtain additional financing.
 
Recent Accounting PronouncementsOutlook
 
A discussion of recent accounting pronouncements is includedThe economy over the last several months has been buffeted with financial institution credit crises ultimately impacting the broader credit markets and the financing available to many companies, both in the NotesU.S. and abroad. Preparation for the impacts of market fluctuations has been a strategic objective for a number of years and Woodward is better positioned at this time to maintain liquidity and relative profitability in the Consolidated Financial Statementsface of potential sales declines than in “Item 8 — Financial Statementsthe past. Future cash flows from operations and Supplementary Data.”available revolving lines of credit are expected to be adequate to meet our cash requirements over the next twelve months.
 
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
 
Disclosures aboutMarket Risk and Risk Management
In the normal course of business, we have exposures to interest rate risk from our long-term debt, foreign exchange rate risk related to our foreign operations, and foreign currency transactions. We are also exposed to various market risks that arise from transactions entered into in the normal course of business related to items such as the cost of raw materials and changes in inflation. Certain contractual relationships with customers and vendors mitigate risks from changes in raw material costs and currency exchange rate changes that arise from normal purchasing and normal sales activities.
Interest Rate Exposure
Derivative instruments utilized by us are viewed as risk management tools, involve little complexity, and are includednot used for trading or speculative purposes. To manage interest rate risk related to the $400 million of long-term debt issued in “Item 7 — Management’s DiscussionOctober 2008, we used a treasury lock which locked in interest rates on future debt. The treasury lock agreement was designated as a cash flow hedge against interest rate risk on a portion of the debt issued in October 2008.
A portion of our long-term debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates. We monitor trends in interest rates as a basis for determining whether to enter into fixed rate or variable rate debt agreements, the duration of such agreements, and Analysiswhether to use hedging strategies. Our primary objective is to minimize our long-term costs of Financial Conditionborrowing. At September 30, 2008, our long-term debt consisted of variable and Results of Operations — Market Risks.”fixed rate agreements. As


3243


measured at September 30, 2008, a hypothetical 1% immediate increase in interest rates would reduce the fair value of our long-term debt by approximately $0.8 million.
The actuarial assumptions used to calculate the funding status of our post-retirement benefit plans and future returns on associated plan assets are sensitive to changes in interest rates. The following information illustrates the sensitivity of the net periodic benefit cost and the projected benefit obligation to a change in the discount rate and in the return on benefit plan assets. Amounts relating to foreign plans are translated at the spot rate on September 30, 2008. The sensitivities reflect the impact of changing one assumption at a time and are specific to base conditions at September 30, 2008. It should be noted that economic factors and conditions often affect multiple assumptions simultaneously and the effects of changes in assumptions are not necessarily linear.
                 
  Increase/(Decrease) in 
        2008 Projected
  Accumulated Post
 
     2009 Net Periodic
  Service and
  Retirement Benefit
 
Assumption
 Change  Benefit Cost  Interest Costs  Obligation 
     (In thousands) 
 
Retirement Pension Benefits:
                
Change in discount rate  1% increase $(107) $(122) $(3,680)
   1% decrease  114   330   4,693 
Retirement Healthcare Benefits:
                
Change in discount rate  1% increase  N/A   N/A   (3,162)
   1% decrease  N/A   N/A   3,705 
Change in healthcare cost trend rate  1% increase  3,939   275   N/A 
   1% decrease  (3,411)  (240)  N/A 
Foreign Currency Exposure
We are impacted by changes in foreign currency rates through sales and purchasing transactions when we sell product in functional currencies different from the currency in which product and manufacturing costs were incurred. The functional currencies of our worldwide facilities primarily include the USD, the Euro, and the GBP. Our purchasing and sales activities are primarily denominated in the USD, the Euro, and the GBP. We may be impacted by changes in the relative buying power of our customers, which may impact sales volumes either positively or negatively. As these currencies fluctuate against each other, and other currencies, we are exposed to foreign currency risk on sales, purchasing transactions, and labor.
Our reported financial results of operations, including the reported value of our assets and liabilities, are also impacted by changes in foreign currency rates. The assets and liabilities of substantially all of our subsidiaries outside the U.S. are translated at period end rates of exchange for each reporting period. Earnings and cash flow statements are translated at weighted-average rates of exchange. Although these translation changes have no immediate cash impact, the translation changes may impact future borrowing capacity, debt covenants, and overall value of our net assets.
Currency exchange rates vary daily and often one currency strengthens against the USD while another currency weakens. Because of the complex interrelationship of the worldwide supply chains and distribution channels, it is difficult to quantify the impact of a particular change in exchange rates.
We estimate that a 10% increase (or decrease) in the purchasing power of the USD against all other currencies for one year would increase (or decrease) net sales by less than 5%. The impact on pretax earnings would be minimal.


44


 
Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
 
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
To the Board of Directors and ShareholdersStockholders of
of Woodward Governor Company:Company
Fort Collins, Colorado
 
In our opinion,We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(1) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial positionbalance sheet of Woodward Governor Company and its subsidiaries at(the “Company”) as of September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2006,2008 and the resultsrelated consolidated statements of their operationsearnings, stockholders’ equity, and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion,year then ended. Our audit also included the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing underIndex at Item 15(a)(2) presents fairly, in all material respects,15. These financial statements are the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2007, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizationsresponsibility of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A.management. Our responsibility is to express opinionsan opinion on these financial statements on the financial statement schedule, and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. audit. The consolidated financial statements of the Company for the years ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 were audited by other auditors whose report, dated November 29, 2007, expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements and included an explanatory paragraph concerning a change in accounting for share-based payments effective October 1, 2005 and a change in the manner the Company presented obligations associated with defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans effective September 30, 2007.
We conducted our auditsaudit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditsaudit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatementmisstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and whether effectivedisclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such 2008 consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Woodward Governor Company and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for uncertain tax positions on October 1, 2007 in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.
We have also audited the adjustments to the 2007 and 2006 consolidated financial statements to retrospectively apply thetwo-for-one stock split as discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. Our procedures included (1) comparing the amounts shown in the earnings per share disclosures for 2007 and 2006 to the Company’s underlying accounting analysis, (2) comparing the previously reported shares outstanding and statement of earnings amounts per the Company’s accounting analysis to the previously issued consolidated financial statements, and (3) recalculating the additional shares to give effect to the stock split and testing the mathematical accuracy of the underlying analysis. In our opinion, such retrospective adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied. However, we were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the 2007 and 2006 consolidated financial statements of the Company other than with respect to the retrospective adjustments and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on the 2007 and 2006 consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was maintainedas of September 30, 2008, based on the criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated November 19, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Denver, Colorado
November 19, 2008


45


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
of Woodward Governor Company
In our opinion, the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2007 and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of two years in the period ended September 30, 2007, before the effects of the adjustments to retrospectively reflect thetwo-for-one stock split described in Note 1B, present fairly, in all material respects.respects, the financial position of Woodward Governor Company and its subsidiaries at September 30, 2007, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended September 30, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (the 2007 financial statements before the effects of the adjustments discussed in Note 1B are not presented herein). In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule for the each of the two years in the period ended September 30, 2007 presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements before the effects of the adjustments described above. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits, before the effects of the adjustments described above, of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements includedare free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.opinion.
 
As discussedWe were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the adjustments to retrospectively reflect thetwo-for-one stock split described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, effective October 1, 2005, the Company changed its method1B and accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of accounting for share-based payments. In addition, as discussed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which obligations associated with defined benefit pensionassurance about whether such adjustments are appropriate and have properly applied. Those adjustments were audited by other postretirement plans are presented effective September 30, 2007.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


33


As described inManagement’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reportingappearing in Item 9A, management has excluded the operations of Schaltanlagen-Elektronik-Geräte GmbH & Co. KG (“SEG”) from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2007, because they were acquired by the Company in purchase business combinations during fiscal 2007. We have also excluded SEG from our audit of internal control over financial reporting. SEG is operated by wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company and has combined assets and combined net sales representing 10 percent and 9 percent, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended September 30, 2007.auditors.
 
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 
Chicago, Illinois
November 29, 2007


3446


Consolidated Statements of EarningsWOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
 
                        
 Years Ended September 30,  Year Ended September 30, 
 2007 2006 2005  2008 2007 2006 
 (In thousands, except per share amounts)  (In thousands, except per share amounts) 
Net sales
 $1,042,337  $854,515  $827,726  $1,258,204  $1,042,337  $854,515 
              
Costs and expenses:                        
Cost of goods sold  728,820   612,263   623,680   882,996   728,820   612,263 
Selling, general, and administrative expenses  111,297   92,013   79,858   115,399   111,297   92,013 
Research and developments costs  65,294   59,861   49,996   73,414   65,294   59,861 
Curtailment gain        (7,825)
Amortization of intangible assets  7,496   6,953   7,087   6,830   7,496   6,953 
            
Interest expense  4,527   5,089   5,814   3,834   4,527   5,089 
Interest income  (3,604)  (2,750)  (2,159)  (2,120)  (3,604)  (2,750)
Other, net  (3,481)  (3,411)  (7,833)
Other income  (4,685)  (4,186)  (4,245)
Other expense  626   705   834 
              
Total costs and expenses  910,349   770,018   748,618   1,076,294   910,349   770,018 
              
Earnings before income taxes  131,988   84,497   79,108   181,910   131,988   84,497 
Income taxes  (33,831)  (14,597)  (23,137)  (60,030)  (33,831)  (14,597)
              
Net earnings
 $98,157  $69,900  $55,971  $121,880  $98,157  $69,900 
              
Earnings per share:
                        
Basic $2.87  $2.03  $1.64  $1.80  $1.43  $1.02 
Diluted $2.79  $1.99  $1.59  $1.75  $1.39  $0.99 
Weighted-average common shares outstanding:
                        
Basic  34,245   34,351   34,200   67,564   68,489   68,702 
Diluted  35,244   35,191   35,127   69,560   70,487   70,382 
 
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


3547


Consolidated Balance SheetsWOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
 
                
 At September 30,  At September 30, 
 2007 2006  2008 2007 
 (In thousands, except per share amounts)  (In thousands, except per share amounts) 
ASSETS
ASSETS
ASSETS
Current assets:                
Cash and cash equivalents $71,635  $83,718  $109,833  $71,635 
Accounts receivable, less allowance for losses of $1,886 and $2,213, respectively  152,826   117,254 
Inventories, net  172,500   149,172 
Accounts receivable, less allowance for losses of $1,648 and $1,886, respectively  178,128   152,826 
Inventories  208,317   172,500 
Income taxes receivable  9,461   1,787      9,461 
Deferred income tax assets  23,754   23,526   25,128   23,754 
Other current assets  8,429   5,777   16,649   8,429 
          
Total current assets  438,605   381,234   538,055   438,605 
Property, plant and equipment, net  158,998   124,176   168,651   158,998 
Goodwill  141,215   132,084   139,577   141,215 
Other intangibles, net  73,018   71,737   66,106   73,018 
Deferred income tax assets  11,250   16,687   6,208   11,250 
Other assets  6,681   9,579   8,420   6,681 
          
Total assets
 $829,767  $735,497  $927,017  $829,767 
          
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:                
Short-term borrowings $5,496  $517  $4,031  $5,496 
Current portion of long-term debt  15,940   14,619   11,560   15,940 
Accounts payable  57,668   38,978   65,427   57,668 
Income taxes payable  2,235    
Accrued liabilities  83,890   66,877   85,591   83,890 
          
Total current liabilities  162,994   120,991   168,844   162,994 
Long-term debt, less current portion  45,150   58,379   33,337   45,150 
Deferred income tax liabilities  19,788   6,248   27,513   19,788 
Other liabilities  57,404   71,190   67,695   57,404 
          
Total liabilities
  285,336   256,808   297,389   285,336 
          
Commitments and contingencies (Note 17)         
Shareholders’ Equity:        
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 4, 14, 17, and 18)        
Stockholders’ Equity:        
Preferred stock, par value $0.003 per share, 10,000 shares authorized, no shares issued            
Common stock, par value $0.002917 per share, 100,000 shares authorized, 36,480 shares issued and outstanding  106   106 
Common stock, par value $0.001455 per share, 150,000 and 100,000 shares authorized, 72,960 shares issued and outstanding  106   106 
Additional paid-in capital  48,641   31,960   68,520   48,641 
Accumulated other comprehensive income  23,010   12,619   20,319   23,010 
Deferred compensation  4,752   5,524   5,283   4,752 
Retained earnings  565,136   481,726   663,442   565,136 
          
  641,645   531,935   757,670   641,645 
Less: Treasury stock at cost, 2,616 shares and 2,426 shares, respectively  (92,462)  (47,722)
Treasury stock held for deferred compensation, at cost, 215 shares and 415 shares, respectively  (4,752)  (5,524)
Less: Treasury stock at cost, 5,261 shares and 5,231 shares, respectively  (122,759)  (92,462)
Treasury stock held for deferred compensation, at cost, 404 shares and 430 shares, respectively  (5,283)  (4,752)
          
Total shareholders’ equity  544,431   478,689 
Total stockholders’ equity  629,628   544,431 
          
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
 $829,767  $735,497 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
 $927,017  $829,767 
          
 
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


3648


Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowWOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
 
                        
 Year Ended September 30,  Year Ended September 30, 
 2007 2006 2005  2008 2007 2006 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Cash flows from operating activities:
                        
Net earnings $98,157  $69,900  $55,971  $121,880  $98,157  $69,900 
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:                        
Depreciation and amortization  32,924   29,017   31,538   35,450   32,924   29,017 
Post retirement settlement gain  (871)           (871)   
Contractual pension termination benefit  715   340         715   340 
Curtailment gain        (7,825)
Net loss (gain) on sale of property, plant and equipment  (199)  84   (68)  1,229   (199)  84 
Share-based compensation  3,849   2,942    
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation  (9,787)  (3,305)   
Stock-based compensation  4,588   3,849   2,942 
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation  (15,355)  (9,787)  (3,305)
Deferred income taxes  12,473   (13,481)  2,627   10,960   12,473   (13,481)
Reclassification of unrealized losses on derivatives to earnings  247   286   321 
Reclassification of unrealized gains and losses on derivatives to earnings  204   247   286 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of business acquisition:                        
Accounts receivable  (20,765)  (8,730)  (9,213)  (26,470)  (20,765)  (8,730)
Inventories  (8,592)  1,140   (11,122)  (36,661)  (8,592)  1,140 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities  16,962   (2,514)  6,422   6,078   16,962   (2,514)
Income taxes receivable  2,952   9,785   (9,270)
Other, net  (10,347)  (4,928)  10,051 
       
Total adjustments  19,561   10,636   13,461 
Current income taxes  27,089   2,952   9,785 
Other  (3,638)  (10,347)  (4,928)
              
Net cash provided by operating activities  117,718   80,536   69,432   125,354   117,718   80,536 
              
Cash flows from investing activities:
                        
Payments for purchase of property, plant and equipment  (31,984)  (31,713)  (26,615)  (37,516)  (31,984)  (31,713)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment  225   698   3,706   1,607   225   698 
Business acquisition, net of cash acquired  (35,289)           (35,289)   
              
Net cash used in investing activities  (67,048)  (31,015)  (22,909)  (35,909)  (67,048)  (31,015)
              
Cash flows from financing activities:
                        
Cash dividends paid  (14,747)  (13,742)  (11,861)  (15,872)  (14,747)  (13,742)
Proceeds from sales of treasury stock as a result of exercise of stock options  7,856   4,163   6,674   9,440   7,856   4,163 
Purchases of treasury stock  (50,952)  (22,306)  (7,292)  (39,801)  (50,952)  (22,306)
Excess tax benefits from stock compensation  9,788   3,305      15,355   9,788   3,305 
Net proceeds (payments) from borrowings under revolving lines of credit  (2,760)  (8,025)  2,899 
Net payments from borrowings under revolving lines of credit  (1,465)  (2,760)  (8,025)
Payments of long-term debt  (15,681)  (14,510)  (923)  (16,257)  (15,681)  (14,510)
Proceeds from cash flow hedge  108       
Debt financing costs  (412)      
Other payments     (318)           (318)
              
Net cash used in financing activities  (66,496)  (51,433)  (10,503)  (48,904)  (66,496)  (51,433)
              
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash  3,743��  1,033   (318)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents  (2,343)  3,743   1,033 
              
Net change in cash and cash equivalents  (12,083)  (879)  35,702   38,198   (12,083)  (879)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  83,718   84,597   48,895   71,635   83,718   84,597 
              
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $71,635  $83,718  $84,597  $109,833  $71,635  $83,718 
              
Supplemental cash flow information:
                        
Interest expense paid $4,870  $5,334  $5,654  $4,216  $4,870  $5,334 
Income taxes paid  21,169   19,131   24,768   33,735   21,169   19,131 
Income tax refunds received  13,579       
Non-cash investing activities:
                        
Long-term debt assumed in business acquisition  10,319            10,319    
Purchases of property, plant and equipment on account  3,583       
Sales of assets on account  433       
 
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


3749


Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’Stockholders’ EquityWOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
 
                        
 Year Ended September 30,  Year Ended September 30, 
 2007 2006 2005  2008 2007 2006 
 (In thousands, except per share amounts)  (In thousands, except per share amounts) 
Common stock:
                        
Beginning and ending balance $106  $106  $106  $106  $106  $106 
              
Additional paid-in capital:
                        
Beginning balance $31,960  $25,854  $15,878  $48,641  $31,960  $25,854 
Sales of treasury stock  1,957   (141)  1,894 
Tax benefits applicable to stock options  9,787   3,305   3,403 
Share-based compensation  3,849   2,942    
(Gain) loss on sales of treasury stock  (628)  1,957   (141)
Tax benefits applicable to exercise of stock options  15,355   9,787   3,305 
Stock-based compensation  4,588   3,849   2,942 
Deferred compensation transfer  1,088      657   564   1,088    
Treasury stock cost adjustment        4,022 
              
Ending balance $48,641  $31,960  $25,854  $68,520  $48,641  $31,960 
              
Accumulated other comprehensive income:
                        
Beginning balance $12,619  $10,904  $12,038  $23,010  $12,619  $10,904 
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of reclassification to earnings  10,514   2,525   336 
Reclassification of unrealized losses on derivatives to earnings  153   177   200 
Impact of implementing SFAS 158  (980)      
Minimum pension liability adjustments  704   (987)  (1,670)
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net  (4,071)  10,514   2,525 
Reclassification of unrealized losses on derivatives to earnings, net  127   153   177 
Proceeds from cash flow hedge, net  67       
Impact of implementing SFAS 158, net     (980)   
Minimum post-retirement benefits liability adjustments, net  1,186   704   (987)
              
Ending balance $23,010  $12,619  $10,904  $20,319  $23,010  $12,619 
              
Deferred compensation:
                        
Beginning balance $5,524  $5,402  $4,461  $4,752  $5,524  $5,402 
Deferred compensation invested in the company’s common stock  2,006   165   984   841   2,006   165 
Deferred compensation settled with the company’s common stock  (2,778)  (43)  (43)  (310)  (2,778)  (43)
              
Ending balance $4,752  $5,524  $5,402  $5,283  $4,752  $5,524 
              
Retained earnings:
                        
Beginning balance $481,726  $425,568  $381,458  $565,136  $481,726  $425,568 
Net earnings  98,157   69,900   55,971   121,880   98,157   69,900 
Cash dividends — $0.43, $0.40 and $0.35 per common share, respectively  (14,747)  (13,742)  (11,861)
Impact of implementing FIN 48  (7,702)      
Cash dividends — $0.235, $0.215 and $0.20 per common share, respectively  (15,872)  (14,747)  (13,742)
              
Ending balance $565,136  $481,726  $425,568  $663,442  $565,136  $481,726 
              
Treasury stock:
                        
Beginning balance $47,722  $29,963  $23,619  $92,462  $47,722  $29,963 
Purchase of treasury stock  50,952   22,820   7,292 
Purchases of treasury stock  39,801   50,952   22,820 
Sales of treasury stock  (5,900)  (5,061)  (4,780)  (9,323)  (5,900)  (5,061)
Deferred compensation transfer  (312)     (190)  (181)  (312)   
Treasury stock cost adjustment        4,022 
              
Ending balance $92,462  $47,722  $29,963  $122,759  $92,462  $47,722 
              
Treasury stock held for deferred compensation:
            
Beginning balance $4,752  $5,524  $5,402 
Deferred compensation transfer  745   1,875    
Stock distributions  (310)  (2,778)  (43)
Automatic dividend reinvestment  96   131   165 
       
Ending balance $5,283  $4,752  $5,524 
       
 
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


3850


Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’Stockholders’ Equity — (Continued)WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
 
                        
 Year Ended September 30,  Year Ended September 30, 
 2007 2006 2005  2008 2007 2006 
 (In thousands, except per share amounts)  (In thousands, except per share amounts) 
Treasury stock held for deferred compensation:
            
Total stockholders’ equity:
            
Beginning balance $5,524  $5,402  $4,461  $544,431  $478,689  $432,469 
Deferred compensation transfer  1,875      847 
Shares distributions  (2,778)  (43)  (43)
Automatic dividend reinvestment  131   165   137 
       
Ending balance $4,752  $5,524  $5,402 
       
Total shareholders’ equity:
            
Beginning balance $478,689  $432,469  $385,861 
Effect of changes among components of shareholders’ equity Additional paid-in capital  16,681   6,106   9,976 
Effect of changes among components of stockholders’ equity            
Additional paid-in capital  19,879   16,681   6,106 
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings  10,391   1,715   (1,134)  (2,691)  10,391   1,715 
Deferred compensation  772   122   941   531   772   122 
Retained earnings  83,410   56,158   44,110   98,306   83,410   56,158 
Treasury stock  (44,740)  (17,759)  (6,344)  (30,297)  (44,740)  (17,759)
Treasury stock held for deferred compensation  (772)  (122)  (941)  (531)  (772)  (122)
              
Total effect of changes among components of shareholders’ equity  65,742   46,220   46,608 
Total effect of changes among components of stockholders’ equity  85,197   65,742   46,220 
              
Ending balance $544,431  $478,689  $432,469  $629,628  $544,431  $478,689 
              
Total comprehensive earnings:
                        
Net earnings $98,157  $69,900  $55,971  $121,880  $98,157  $69,900 
Other comprehensive earnings:                        
Foreign currency translation adjustments  10,514   2,525   336 
Reclassification of unrealized losses on derivatives to earnings  153   177   200 
Minimum pension liability adjustment  704   (987)  (1,670)
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net  (4,071)  10,514   2,525 
Reclassification of unrealized losses on derivatives to earnings, net  127   153   177 
Gain on cash flow hedge, net  67       
Post-retirement benefit adjustments, net  1,186   704   (987)
              
Total other comprehensive earnings  11,371   1,715   (1,134)  (2,691)  11,371   1,715 
              
Total comprehensive earnings $109,528  $71,615  $54,837  $119,189  $109,528  $71,615 
              
Common stock, number of shares:
                        
Beginning and ending balance  36,480   36,480   36,480   72,960   72,960   72,960 
       
Treasury stock, number of shares:
                        
Beginning balance  2,426   2,154   2,532   5,231   4,852   4,308 
Purchase of treasury stock  840   720   273 
Purchases of treasury stock  1,384   1,680   1,440 
Sales of treasury stock  (616)  (448)  (615)  (1,330)  (1,233)  (896)
Deferred compensation transfer  (34)     (36)  (24)  (68)   
              
Ending balance  2,616   2,426   2,154   5,261   5,231   4,852 
              
Treasury stock held for deferred compensation, number of shares:
                        
Beginning balance  415   414   375   430   830   828 
Deferred compensation transfer  34      36   24   68    
Share distributions  (237)  (4)  (3)
Stock distributions  (53)  (474)  (8)
Automatic dividend reinvestment  3   5   6   3   6   10 
              
Ending balance  215   415   414   404   430   830 
              
 
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


3951


WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
 
Note 1. Operations and summary of significant accounting policies
 
A. Nature of operations
 
Woodward Governor Company (“Woodward” or the “Company”) is one of the largestan independent designers, manufacturers,designer, manufacturer, and service providersprovider of energy control and optimization solutions for commercial and military aircraft, turbines, reciprocating engine, aircraft and industrial turbine,engines, and electrical power system equipment. Woodward’s innovative fluid energy, combustion control, electrical energy, and motion control systems help customers offer cleaner, more reliable, and more cost-effective equipment. Leading original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) throughout the world use ourWoodward’s products and services in theaerospace, power generation, power distribution, aerospace, transportation, and process industries, markets.and transportation.
 
Woodward was established in 1870 and incorporated in 1902. Woodward serves global markets from locations worldwide and is headquartered in Fort Collins, Colorado. Woodward’s principal plants are located in the U.S., China, Germany, and Poland. The Company operates other facilities in Brazil, India, Japan, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom, which are used primarily for sales and service activities.
 
BeginningDuring fiscal years 2008, 2007, and 2006, Woodward operated in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, Woodward realigned its operations into the following three business segments in order to better align its operations with the evolving nature of the customers and served markets:segments:
 
 • Turbine Systemsis focused on developing and manufacturing systems and components that provide energy control and optimization solutions for the aircraft and industrial gas turbine markets.
 
 • Engine Systemsis focused on developing and manufacturing systems and components that provide energy control and optimization solutions for the industrial engine and steam turbine markets, which includes power generation, transportation, and process industries.
 
 • Electrical Power Systemsis focused on developing and manufacturing systems and components that provide power sensing and energy control systems that improve the security, quality, reliability, and availability of electrical power networks for industrial markets, which includes power generation, power distribution, transportation, and process industries.
 
All segment information for the years ended September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005 has been restated to reflect the realigned segment structure.
B. Summary of significant accounting policies
 
Principles of consolidation:  The Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“U.S. GAAP”) and include the accounts of the companyWoodward and its majority-owned subsidiaries. Transactions within and between these companies are eliminated. Results of joint ventures in which Woodward does not have a controlling financial interest are included in the financial statements using the equity method of accounting.
 
Stock-split:  A three-for-onetwo-for-one stock split was approved by shareholdersstockholders at the 20052007 annual meeting of shareholdersstockholders on January 25, 2006.23, 2008. The stock split became effective for shareholdersstockholders at the close of business on February 1, 2006.2008. The number of shares and per share amounts reported in these consolidated financial statements havethe Consolidated Financial Statements has been updated from amounts reported prior to February 1, 2006,2008, to reflect the effects of the split. In addition, in accordance with stock option plan provisions, the terms of all outstanding stock option awards were proportionally adjusted.
 
Use of estimates:  FinancialThe preparation of financial statements prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States require the use ofU.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts reported.of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses recognized during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from Woodward’s estimates.
 
Reclassifications:  Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year balances in order to conform to the current year’s presentation.


52


WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
Foreign currency translation:currency:  The assets and liabilities of substantially all subsidiaries outside the United StatesU.S. are translated at year-end rates of exchange, and earnings and cash flow statements are translated at weighted-average rates of exchange. Translation adjustments are accumulated with other comprehensive earnings as a separate component of shareholders’stockholders’ equity and are presented net of tax effects in the Consolidated Statements of


40


WOODWARD
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
Shareholders’ Stockholders’ Equity. The effects of changes in exchange rates on loans between consolidated subsidiaries that are not expected to be repaid in the foreseeable future are also accumulated with other comprehensive earnings.
 
The Company is exposed to market risks related to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates because some sales transactions, and the assets and liabilities of its domestic and foreign subsidiaries, are denominated in foreign currencies. Selling, general, and administrative expenses include net foreign currency transaction losses of $1,454 in 2008, $249 in 2007 and $903 in 2006.
Revenue recognition:  The provisions of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 “Revenue Recognition,” and all other related interpretations have been applied. Sales are generally recognized when delivery of product has occurred or services have been rendered and there is persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement, selling prices are fixed or determinable, and collectibilitycollectability from the customer is reasonably assured. Revenue from sales arrangements with multiple deliverables are recognized when there is pervasive evidence of a sales arrangement for each individual deliverable.
Product delivery is generally considered to have occurred when the customer has taken title and assumed the risks and rewards of ownership of the products. In countries whose laws provide for retention of some form of title by sellers enabling recovery of goods in the event of customer default on payment, product delivery is considered to have occurred when the customer has assumed the risks and rewards of ownership of the products. Most of the sales are made directly to customers that use Woodward products, although products are also sold to distributors, dealers, and independent service facilities. Sales terms for distributors, dealers, and independent service facilities are substantially similar to Woodward’s sales terms for direct customers.
Customer Rebates:  Woodward sometimes agrees to make rebate payments to customers related to anticipated sales activity. Payments made to customers are accounted for as a reduction of revenue unless they are made in exchange for identifiable goods or services with fair values that can be reasonably estimated. These reductions in revenues are recognized immediately to the extent that the payments cannot be attributed to expectedanticipated future sales, and are recognized in future periods to the extent that the payments relate to future sales, based on the specific facts and circumstances underlying each payment. Payments that are probable and can be reasonably estimated are accrued at expected rates based on anticipated sale activity.
 
Share-basedStock-based compensation:  On October 1, 2005, Woodward began to measure the costThe provisions of employee services in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award and to recognize the cost over the requisite service period in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123R, “Share-Based PaymentPayment” (“SFAS123(R)”SFAS 123R”).” Prior requiring that compensation cost relating to October 1, 2005, Woodward used the intrinsic value methodstock-based payment awards made to account for share-based employee compensation under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,”employees and therefore compensation expense was notdirectors be recognized in association withthe financial statements have been applied. Non-qualified stock option awards are issued under Woodward’s stock-based compensation plans. The cost for such awards is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award. Historical company information is the primary basis for selection of the expected term, expected volatility, and expected dividend yield assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the options granted at or above the market price of its common stock aton the date of grant. Upon adoption of the new accounting method, Woodward used the modified prospective transition method, under which financial statements for periods prior to the date of adoption were not adjusted for the change in accounting.
Share-based expense recognized under SFAS 123(R) was as follows (in thousands):
         
Year Ended September 30,
 2007  2006 
 
Employee share-based compensation expense $3,849  $2,942 
Concurrent with the adoption of the new statement, Woodward began to use the non-substantive vesting period approach for attributing stock compensation to individual periods. The nominal vesting period approach was used in determining the stock compensation expense for the pro forma 2005 net earnings in a table that follows. The change in the attribution method accelerated the recognition of such expense for non-substantive vesting conditions, such as retirement eligibility provisions. Woodward recognizes stock compensation on a straight-line basis for options with graded vesting schedules.


41


WOODWARD
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
 
The following table reconciles reported net earnings and per share informationportion of the award that is ultimately expected to pro forma net earnings and per share information that would have been reported ifvest is recognized as expense over the fair value method had been used to account for stock-based employee compensation in 2005:requisite service periods, which is generally the vesting period of the awards.
 
     
Reported earnings $55,971 
Less: Share based compensation expense using fair value method, net of income taxes  (1,502)
     
Pro-forma net earnings $54,469 
     
Reported net earnings per share:    
Basic $1.64 
Diluted  1.59 
Pro-forma net earnings per share:    
Basic $1.59 
Diluted  1.55 
SFAS 123R requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of the grant in order to estimate the portion of the award that will ultimately vest. The estimate is based on Woodward’s historical rates of forfeitures and is updated periodically.
 
Research and development costs:  Expenditures related to new product development activities are expensed when incurred and are separately reported in the consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of earnings.Earnings.


53


WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
 
Income taxes:  Deferred income taxes are provided for the temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of the company’sWoodward’s assets and liabilities. Woodward provides for taxes that may be payable if undistributed earnings of overseas subsidiaries were to be remitted to the United States,U.S., except for those earnings that it considers to be permanently reinvested.
 
Cash equivalents:  Highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents.
 
Cash and cash equivalents are maintained with several financial institutions. Deposits held with banks may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits. Generally, these deposits may be redeemed upon demand and are maintained with financial institutions with reputable credit and therefore bear minimal credit risk. Woodward holds cash and cash equivalents at financial institutions in excess of amounts covered by federal depository insurance.
 
Accounts receivable:  Virtually all Woodward’s sales are made on credit and result in accounts receivable, which are recorded at the amount invoiced. In the normal course of business, not all accounts receivable are collected and, therefore, an allowance for losses of accounts receivable is provided equal to the amount that Woodward believes ultimately will not be collected. Customer-specific information is considered related to delinquent accounts, past loss experience, and current economic conditions in establishing the amount of its allowance. Accounts receivable losses are deducted from the allowance and the related accounts receivable balances are written off when the receivables are deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of accounts receivable previously written off are recognized when received.
 
Inventories:  Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market, with cost being determined on afirst-in, first-out basis. Component parts include items that can be sold separately as finished goods or included in the manufacture of other products.
 
Property, plant, and equipment:  Property, plant, and equipment are recorded at cost and are depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the assets, ranging from 5five to 40 years for buildings and improvements and 3three to 15fifteen years for machinery and equipment. Assets placed in service after September 30, 1998, are depreciated using the straight-line method and assets placed in service as of and prior to September 30, 1998, are depreciated principally using accelerated methods.method. Assets are tested for recoverability whenever events or circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable.
 
Goodwill:Purchase Accounting:  Goodwill representsThe provisions of SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations” and related interpretations have been applied. Business combinations are accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Under the purchase method, assets and liabilities are recorded at their fair values as of the acquisition date, including intangible assets. Acquisition costs in excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the net amountamounts assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Goodwill is tested for impairmentassumed are recorded as goodwill.
Goodwill:  Woodward tests goodwill on the reporting unit level on an annual basis and more often if an


42


WOODWARD
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount.
The goodwill impairment test is a two-step process. In the first step,consist of comparing the fair value of athe reporting unit, is compareddetermined using discounted cash flows, with its carrying amount including goodwill. The goodwill, is considered potentially impairedand, if the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value. The second step is performed for all goodwill that is potentially impaired. In this step,value, comparing the implied fair value of the goodwill of the reporting unit is compared to thewith its carrying amount of that goodwill. The implied fair value of the goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized when a business combination is determined.amount. If the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill, an impairment loss would be recognized to reduce the carrying amount to its implied fair value.
A reporting unit is the level at which goodwill is tested for impairment. A reporting unit is an operating segment There was no impairment charge recorded in fiscal 2008, fiscal 2007, or a component one level below an operating segment if the component constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results of that component. Two or more components would be aggregated and considered a single reporting unit if the components have similar economic conditions. In the most recent impairment test, it was determined the operating segments were the reporting units for purposes of the impairment tests.fiscal 2006.
 
Other intangibles:  Other intangibles are recognized apart from goodwill whenever an acquired intangible asset arises from contractual or other legal rights, or whenever it is capable of being separated or divided from the acquired entity and sold, transferred, licensed, rented, or exchanged, either individually or in combination with a related contract, asset, or liability. An intangible other than goodwill is amortized over its estimated useful life (1.5 to 15 years) unless that life is determined to be indefinite. Currently, allAll of Woodward’s intangibles have an estimated useful life and are being amortized. Impairment losses are recognized if the carrying amount of an intangible exceeds its fair value.


54


WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
Estimated lives over which intangible assets are amortized, on a straight line basis, at September 30, 2008 were as follows:
Customer relationships10 - 30 years
Intellectual property15 years
Process technology8 - 30 years
Patents10 - 14 years
Other intangibles15 years
 
Deferred compensation:  Deferred compensation obligations will be settled either by delivery of a fixed number of shares of the company’sWoodward’s common stock (in accordance with certain eligible members’ irrevocable elections) or in cash. Woodward has contributed shares of its common stock into a trust established for the future settlement of deferred compensation obligations that are payable in shares of Woodward’s common stock. Common stock held by the trust is reflected in the consolidated balance sheetConsolidated Balance Sheet as treasury stock held for deferred compensation and the related deferred compensation obligation is reflected as a separate component of equity in amounts equal to the fair value of the common stock at the dates of contribution. These accounts are not adjusted for subsequent changes in fair value of the common stock. Deferred compensation obligations that will be settled in cash are accounted for on an accrual basis in accordance with the terms of the underlying contract and are reflected in the consolidated balance sheetConsolidated Balance Sheet as an accrued expense.liability.
Investments:  Woodward holds marketable equity securities related to its deferred compensation program. In accordance with SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities” and based on Woodward’s intentions regarding these instruments, marketable equity securities are classified as trading securities. The trading securities are reported at fair value, with realized gains and losses recognized in earnings. The trading securities are included in “Other current assets.” The associated obligation to provide benefits is included in “Other liabilities.”
 
Derivatives:  Woodward recognize derivatives, which are usedThe Company is exposed to hedgevarious market risks associated withthat arise from transactions entered into in the normal course of business. The Company utilizes derivative instruments such as treasury lock agreements to lock in fixed rates on future debt issuances that qualify as cash flow or fair value hedges to mitigate the risk of variability in cash flows related to future interest rates, as assets or liabilities at fair value. These derivatives are designated as hedges of its exposurepayments attributable to changes in the designated benchmark rate. The Company complies with SFAS Nos. 133, 137, 138 and 149 (collectively “SFAS 133”) pertaining to the accounting for these derivatives and hedging activities which require all such interest rate hedge instruments to be recorded on the balance sheet at fair value of long-term debt or as hedges of its exposurevalue. Cash flows related to variable cash flows of future interest payments. The gain or loss in the value of a derivativeinstrument designated as a fair valuequalifying hedge is recognized in earningsare reflected in the periodaccompanying Consolidated Statements of change together with an offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item. The effective portion of a gain or lossCash Flows in the valuesame categories as the cash flows from the items being hedged. Accordingly, cash flows relating to the settlement of a derivative designated as a cash flow hedge is initially reportedinterest rate derivatives hedging the forecasted issuance of debt have been reflected upon settlement as a component of other comprehensive earnings and is subsequently reclassified into earnings when the hedged item affects earnings.financing cash flows. The ineffective portion of theresulting gain or loss infrom such settlement is deferred to other comprehensive income and reclassified to interest expense over the valueterm of a derivative designatedthe underlying debt. This reclassification of the deferred gains and losses impacts the interest expense recognized on the underlying debt that was hedged and is therefore reflected as a component of operating cash flow hedgeflows in periods subsequent to settlement. The periodic settlement of interest rate derivatives hedging outstanding variable rate debt is reported in earnings immediately.recorded as an adjustment to interest expense and is therefore reflected as a component of operating cash flows.
 
Shareholders’Post-retirement benefits:  The Company provides various benefits to certain employees through defined benefit plans and retirement healthcare benefit plans. For financial reporting purposes, net periodic benefits expense and related obligations are calculated using a number of significant actuarial assumptions. Changes in net periodic expense may occur in the future due to changes in these assumptions.


55


WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
The weighted average actuarial assumptions used in measuring the net periodic benefit cost and plan obligations of retirement pension benefits were as follows:
                         
  Year Ended September 30, 
  United States  Other Countries 
  2008  2007  2006  2008  2007  2006 
 
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligation at September 30:
                        
Discount rate  6.5%  6.1%  5.6%  4.7%  4.8%  4.4%
Rate of compensation increase  N/A   N/A   4.5   3.7   3.8   3.4 
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost for years ended September 30:
                        
Discount rate  6.1   5.6   5.3   5.7   4.4   4.1 
Rate of compensation increase  N/A   N/A   4.5   3.7   3.8   3.2 
Long-term rate of return on plan assets  7.5   8.0   8.0   5.6   5.8   5.6 
The discount rate assumption is intended to reflect the rate at which the retirement benefits could be effectively settled based upon the assumed timing of the benefit payments. In the U.S., Woodward used a bond portfolio matching analysis based on recently traded, non-callable bonds rated AA- or better by Standard & Poors, which have at least $25.0 million outstanding. In the United Kingdom, Woodward used the AA corporate bond index (applicable for bonds over 15 years) and government bond yields (for bonds over 15 years) to determine a blended rate to use as the benchmark. In Japan, Woodward used AA-rated corporate bond yields (for bonds of 12.5 years) as the benchmark. Woodward’s assumed rates do not differ significantly from any of these benchmarks.
The investment objectives for the pension plan assets are designed to generate returns that will enable the pension plans to meet their future obligations. The precise amount for which these obligations will be settled depends on future events, including the life expectancy of the plan participants. These obligations are estimated using actuarial assumptions, based on the current economic environment. The strategy balances the requirements to generate returns, using the higher-returning assets such as equity securities with the need to control risk in the pension plan with less volatile assets, such as fixed-income securities. Risks include, among others, the likelihood of the pension plans becoming underfunded, thereby increasing their dependence on contributions from Woodward. The assets are managed by professional investment firms and performance is evaluated against specific benchmarks. In the U.S., assets are primarily invested in broadly diversified passive vehicles.
The weighted average actuarial assumptions used in measuring the net periodic benefit cost and plan obligations of retirement healthcare benefits follows:
             
  Year Ended September 30,
  2008 2007 2006
 
Weighted-average discount rate assumptions used to determine benefit obligation at September 30  6.5%  6.1%  5.6%
Weighted-average discount rate assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost for years ended September 30  6.1%  5.6%  5.3%
The discount rate assumption is intended to reflect the rate at which the retirement benefits could be effectively settled based upon the assumed timing of the benefit payments. In the U.S., Woodward used a bond portfolio matching analysis based on recently traded, non-callable bonds rated AA- or better by Standard & Poors, which have at least $25.0 million outstanding. In the United Kingdom, Woodward used the AA corporate bond index (applicable for bonds over 15 years) and government bond yields (for bonds over 15 years) to determine a blended rate to use as the benchmark. Woodward’s assumed rates do not differ significantly from any of these benchmarks.


56


WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
For retirement healthcare benefits, Woodward assumed net healthcare cost trend rates of 8.0% in 2009, decreasing gradually to 5.0% in 2011, and remaining at 5.0% thereafter. A 1.0% increase in assumed healthcare cost trend rates would have increased the total of the service and interest cost components by approximately $275 and increased the benefit obligation at the end of the year by approximately $3,939 in 2008. Likewise, a 1.0% decrease in the assumed rates would have decreased the total of service and interest cost components by $240 and decreased the benefit obligation by approximately $3,411 in 2008.
Stockholders’ equity:  In July 2006, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $50,000 of itsWoodward’s outstanding shares of common stock on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions over a three-year period (the “2006 Authorization”). During fiscal 2007, Woodward purchased a total of $38,649 of ourits common stock under the 2006 Authorization. Pursuant to theThe 2006 Authorization in August 2007, Woodward entered into an


43


WOODWARDis closed.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
agreement with J.P. Morgan Chase Bank whereby Woodward purchased 453.5 common shares in exchange for $31,100. Under the accelerated stock repurchase agreement, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank is to purchase an equivalent number of Woodward’s common shares in the open market over a period of up to four months, and at the end of that period, additional shares may be delivered to or by Woodward based on the volume-weighted average price of our common shares during the same period, subject to a cap and a floor as determined according to the terms of agreement. 75 common shares have been held back from the repurchase to allow for net share settlement, if required. This arrangement with J.P. Morgan Chase Bank completed the stock repurchase program previously authorized in July 2006.
DuringIn September 2007, the Board of Directors authorized a new stock repurchase of up to $200,000 of Woodward’s outstanding shares of common stock on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions over a three-year period that will end in October 2010.2010 (the “2007 Authorization”). During fiscal 2008, Woodward purchased a total of $31,925 of its common stock under the 2007 Authorization.
 
Advertising Costs:  Woodward expenses all advertising costs as incurred and they are classified within selling, general, and administrative expenses. Advertising costs were not material for all years presented.
 
Accounting changes:Shipping and Handling Costs:  Product freight costs are included in cost of goods sold.
 
SFAS 158:  In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans” (“SFAS 158”), which requires the recognition of the funded status of defined pension and postretirement plans in the statement of financial position. The funded status is measured as the difference between the fair market value of the plan assets and the benefit obligation. For a defined benefit pension plan, the benefit obligation is the projected benefit obligation; for any other defined benefit postretirement plan, such as a retiree health care plan, the benefit obligation is the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation. Any over funded status should be recognized as an asset and any underfunded status should be recognized as a liability. As part of the initial recognition of the funded status, any transitional asset/(liability), prior service cost/(credit) or actuarial gain/(loss) that has not yet been recognized as a component of net periodic cost should be recognized in the Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income section of the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity, net of tax. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income will be adjusted as these amounts are subsequently recognized as a component of net periodic benefit costs in future periods.
Note 2. Recently adopted and issued but not yet effective accounting standards
 
The method of calculating net periodic benefit cost under SFAS 158 is the same as under existing practices. SFAS 158 prescribes additional disclosure requirements including the classification of the current and noncurrent components of plan liabilities, as well as the disclosure of amounts included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income that will be recognized as a component of the net periodic benefit cost in the following year.
The recognition of the funded status requirement and certain disclosure provisions of SFAS 158 are effective for Woodward as of the end of fiscal 2007. Retrospective application of SFAS 158 is not permitted. The initial incremental recognition of the funded status under SFAS 158 that is reflected upon adoption in the Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income section of Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity was an after tax decrease to equity of $980.


44


WOODWARD
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
The impact of adopting the provisions of SFAS 158 on the components of the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2007 is as follows (see Note 13 for additional information regarding retirement benefits):
             
  Before
  Adjustment
  After
 
  Application
  Increases/
  Application
 
  of SFAS 158  (Decreases)  of SFAS 158 
 
Retirement Pension Benefits:
            
Deferred tax asset $1,980  $816  $2,796 
Total assets  1,980   816   2,796 
Pension obligation  (4,674)  (2,916)  (7,590)
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes  3,293   2,100   5,393 
Total shareholders’ equity  3,293   2,100   5,393 
Total liabilities and equity  (1,381)  (816)  (2,197)
Retirement Healthcare Benefits:
            
Deferred tax liability     (687)  (687)
Pension obligation  (46,494)  1,807   (44,687)
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes     (1,120)  (1,120)
Total shareholders’ equity     (1,120)  (1,120)
A. Accounting changes and recently adopted accounting standards:
 
Recent accounting pronouncements:Income taxes
 
FIN 48:  In July 2006, the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Financial Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for which provides guidance on the financial statement recognition, measurement, reporting, and measurementdisclosure of auncertain tax positionpositions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return; requires certain disclosuresreturn. FIN 48 addresses the determination of uncertainwhether tax positions; specifies how reserves for uncertain tax positionsbenefits, either permanent or temporary, should be classified onrecorded in the balance sheet; and provides guidance on accounting for interest and penalties associated withfinancial statements. For those tax positions, among other provisions.benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
Woodward adopted the provisions of FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 andon October 1, 2007, as required. The change in measurement criteria caused Woodward to recognize a result, is effective for Woodwarddecrease in the first quarterretained earnings component of fiscal 2008. Woodward is currently assessing the impact that FIN 48 may have on its resultsstockholders’ equity of operations and financial position.$7,702. For additional information, see Note 4, “Income Taxes.”
B. Issued but not yet effective accounting standards:
 
SFAS 157:  In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting StandardsSFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157, which defines fair value, establishes a framework and gives guidance regarding the methods used for measuring fair value, and expandsrequires additional disclosures about a Company’s financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value measurements.value. SFAS 157 does not change existing guidance on whether or not an instrument is carried at fair value. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. AsIn February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”)No. FAS 157-1, “Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13” (“FSPFAS 157-1”) which excludes SFAS No. 13, “Accounting for Leases” and certain other accounting pronouncements that address fair value measurements, from the scope of SFAS 157. In February 2008, the FASB issued FSPNo. FAS 157-2, “Effective


57


WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
Date of FASB Statement No. 157” (“FSPFAS 157-2”) which provides a result,one-year delayed application of SFAS 157 is effective for Woodwardnonfinancial assets and liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the first quarterfinancial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). Woodward is required to adopt SFAS 157 as amended by FSPFAS 157-1 and FSPFAS 157-2 on October 1, 2008, the beginning of fiscal 2009. WoodwardThe adoption is currentlynot expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FSPNo. FAS 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset in a Market That Is Not Active” (“FSPFAS 157-3”), which clarifies the application of SFAS 157 when the market for a financial asset is inactive. Specifically, FSPFAS 157-3 clarifies how (1) management’s internal assumptions should be considered in measuring fair value when observable data are not present, (2) observable market information from an inactive market should be taken into account, and (3) the use of broker quotes or pricing services should be considered in assessing the impact thatrelevance of observable and unobservable data to measure fair value. The guidance in FSPFAS 157-3 is effective immediately and will apply to the Company upon adoption of SFAS 157 may have on its results of operations and financial position.157.
 
SFAS 159:  In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 is expected to expand the use of fair value accounting but does not affect existing standards whichthat require certain assets or liabilities to be carried at fair value. The objective of SFAS 159 is to improve financial reporting by providing companies with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. Under SFAS 159, a company may choose, at specified election dates, to measure eligible items at fair value and report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. SFAS 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. As a result, SFAS 159 is effective for Woodward in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. Woodward does not plan to apply SFAS 159.
EITF 07-3:  In June 2007, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) issuedEITF 07-3, “Accounting for Nonrefundable Advance Payments for Goods or Services to Be Used in Future Research and Development Activities”(“EITF 07-3”).EITF 07-3 addresses the diversity that exists with respect to the accounting for the non-refundable portion of a payment made by a research and development entity for future research and development activities. The EITF concluded that an entity must defer and capitalize non-refundable advance payments made for research and development activities, and expense these amounts as the related goods are delivered or the related services are performed.EITF 07-3 is effective for interim or annual reporting periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007 (fiscal 2009 for Woodward). Woodward does not expect the adoption ofEITF 07-03 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
EITF 07-1:  In November 2007, the EITF issuedEITF 07-1, “Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements”(“EITF 07-1”).EITF 07-1, which will be applied retrospectively, requires expanded disclosures for contractual arrangements with third parties that involve joint operating activities and may require reclassifications to previously issued financial statements.EITF 07-1 is effective for interim or annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2008 (fiscal 2010 for Woodward). Woodward is currently evaluating the impactEITF 07-1 may have on consolidated financial statements.
SFAS 141(R):  In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (Revised) “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141(R)”). SFAS 141(R) is intended to improve, simplify, and converge internationally the accounting for business combinations. Under SFAS 141(R), an acquiring entity in a business combination must recognize the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquired entity at the acquisition date fair values, with limited exceptions. In addition, SFAS 141(R) requires the acquirer to disclose all information that investors and other users need to evaluate and understand the nature and financial impact of the business combination. SFAS 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is


4558


 
WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
 
prohibited. Accordingly, Woodward will record and disclose business combinations under the revised standard beginning October 1, 2009.
SFAS 160:  In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an Amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) 51,” (“SFAS 160”). This statement amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest (minority interest) in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards that require (i) noncontrolling interests to be reported as a component of equity, (ii) changes in a parent’s ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling interest be accounted for as equity transactions, and (iii) any retained noncontrolling equity investment upon the deconsolidation of a subsidiary be initially measured at fair value. SFAS 160 is to be applied prospectively to business combinations consummated on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period on or after December 15, 2008. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal 2009.years beginning after December 15, 2008. As a result, SFAS 160 is effective for Woodward in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Woodward is currently evaluating the impact SFAS 160 may have on its consolidated financial statements.
SFAS 161:  In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 is intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. The new standard is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008 (fiscal 2010 for Woodward). Woodward is currently assessing the impact that SFAS 159161 may have on its results of operations andconsolidated financial position.statements.
 
Reclassifications:FSPFAS 142-3:  In April 2008, the FASB issued FSPNo. FAS 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (“FSPFAS 142-3”), which improves the consistency of the useful life of a recognized intangible asset among various pronouncements. FSPFAS 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 (fiscal 2010 for Woodward). Woodward is currently assessing the impact that FSPFAS 142-3 may have on its consolidated financial statements.
SFAS 162:  In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (“SFAS 162”). The new standard is intended to improve financial reporting by identifying a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements that are presented in conformity with U.S. GAAP for nongovernmental entities. The new standard is effective 60 days following the Security and Exchange Commission’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” Woodward is currently assessing the impact that SFAS 162 may have on its consolidated financial statements.
FSPEITF 03-6-1:  In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff PositionNo. EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities” (“FSPEITF 03-6-1”). The FSP addresses whether instruments granted in stock-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share under the two-class method described in paragraphs 60 and 61 of SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share.” The new FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and interim periods within those years (fiscal 2010 for Woodward). Early application is not permitted. Woodward’s unvested options are not eligible to receive dividends; therefore, FSPEITF 03-06-1 will not have any impact on its consolidated financial statements.
FSPSFAS 133-1:  In September 2008, the FASB issued FSPNo. FAS 133-1 “Disclosures about Credit Derivatives and Certain reclassifications have been madeGuarantees: An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (“FSPFAS 133-1”) and FASB Interpretation No. 45; and Clarification of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 161”. This FSP amends


59


WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
Notes to prior year balancesConsolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in orderthousands, except per share)
SFAS No. 133 to conformrequire disclosures by sellers of credit derivatives, including credit derivatives embedded in a hybrid instrument. This FSP also amends FIN No. 45 to require an additional disclosure about the current year’s presentation, includingstatus of the reclassifications relatedpayment/performance risk of a guarantee. Further, this FSP clarifies the FASB’s intent about the effective date of SFAS No. 161. This FSP is effective for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2008. Woodward expects to adopt this FSP for periods ending on and after December 31, 2008. Woodward is currently assessing the change in segments.impact that FSPNo. FAS 133-1 may have on its consolidated financial statements.
 
Note 2.3. Business acquisitions
 
On October 31, 2006, Woodward acquired 100 percent of the stock of Schaltanlagen-Elektronik-Geräte GmbH & Co. KG (“SEG”), and a related receivable from SEG that was held by one of the sellers, for $35,289, including $10,319 of assumed debt obligations. The transaction was financed with available cash. The acquisition provides Woodward with technologies and products that complement its power generation system solutions. Headquartered in Kempen, Germany, SEG designs and manufactures a wide range of protection and comprehensive control systems for power generation and distribution applications, power inverters for wind turbines, and complete electrical systems for gas and diesel engine based power stations.
 
As part of the acquisition, Woodward implemented a plan to exit from a project-based segment of the business. Costs related to exiting this line of business have been accrued as business termination costs, including involuntary employee termination benefits and relocation costs. Due to changes in the market, Woodward no longer expects to exit from the project-based segment of the business. Woodward estimates that the implementation of its planthe remaining restructuring to exit from the product linethis business will be completed in approximately 18 months.fiscal year 2009.
 
The following table summarizes estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition, including accrued termination costs.
     
At October 31, 2006
   
 
Current assets $22,612 
Property, plant, and equipment  24,652 
Investment in joint venture  226 
Intangible assets  7,761 
Deferred tax benefit  756 
Goodwill  6,296 
     
Total assets Acquired  62,303 
     
Current liabilities  14,437 
Accrued termination costs  1,753 
Long-term debt  10,319 
Deferred taxes  505 
     
Total liabilities assumed  27,014 
     
Net assets acquired $35,289 
     
A summary of the intangible assets acquired follows:
         
  Amount  Life 
 
Trade name $1,425   15 years 
Customer lists  2,335   1.5 - 10 years 
Patents  4,001   10 - 14 years 
     
Accrued termination costs, October 1, 2006 $1,753 
Payments  (448)
Foreign currency translation  218 
     
Accrued termination costs, September 30, 2007  1,523 
Payments  (128)
Changes in estimates  (599)
Foreign currency translation  5 
     
Accrued termination costs, September 30, 2008 $801 
     
 
The results of SEG’s operations are included in WoodwardWoodward’s Consolidated Statements of Earnings from the beginning of November 2006. If the acquisition had been completed on October 1, 2005,2006, Woodward’s net sales and


46


WOODWARD
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
net earnings for the fiscal yearsyear ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 would not have been materially different from amounts reported in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
 
Note 3.4. Income taxes
 
Income taxes consisted of the following:
 
                        
Year Ended September 30,
 2007 2006 2005  2008 2007 2006 
Current:                        
Federal $6,204  $21,117  $18,149  $26,689  $6,204  $21,117 
State  3,416   3,223   2,995   4,080   3,416   3,223 
Foreign  10,465   3,994   (675)  17,583   10,465   3,994 
Deferred  13,746   (13,737)  2,668   11,678   13,746   (13,737)
              
 $33,831  $14,597  $23,137  $60,030  $33,831  $14,597 
              


60


WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
 
Earnings before income taxes by geographical area consisted of the following:
 
                        
Year Ended September 30,
 2007 2006 2005  2008 2007 2006 
United States $93,818  $70,037  $81,244  $96,934  $93,818  $70,037 
Germany  22,012   5,991   (332)  46,239   22,012   5,991 
Other countries  16,158   8,469   (1,805)  38,737   16,158   8,469 
              
 $131,988  $84,497  $79,108  $181,910  $131,988  $84,497 
              
 
Deferred income taxes presented in the consolidated balance sheetsConsolidated Balance Sheets are related to the following:
 
                
At September 30,
 2007 2006  2008 2007 
Deferred tax assets:
                
Retirement healthcare and early retirement benefits $16,913  $18,691  $14,528  $16,913 
Foreign net operating loss carryforwards  11,007   16,245   4,579   11,007 
Inventory  14,491   9,363   14,828   14,491 
Other  23,744   30,779   20,637   23,744 
Valuation allowance  (2,596)  (2,566)  (129)  (2,596)
          
Total deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance  63,559   72,512   54,443   63,559 
          
Deferred tax liabilities:
                
Intangibles — net  (29,761)  (26,294)  (33,354)  (29,761)
Other  (18,582)  (12,253)  (17,266)  (18,582)
          
Total deferred tax liabilities  (48,343)  (38,547)  (50,620)  (48,343)
          
Net deferred tax assets $15,216  $33,965  $3,823  $15,216 
          
 
The foreign net operating loss carryforwards as of September 30, 2007 includes $336 that expires in 2012, $164 that expires in 2013, and $10,507 that2008 may be carried forward indefinitely.
 
At September 30, 2007,2008, Woodward didhas not provideprovided for taxes on undistributed foreign earnings of $20,786$32,642 that were consideredit considers permanently reinvested. These earnings could become subject to income taxes if they are remitted as dividends, are loaned to the company,Woodward, or if Woodwardit sells its stock in the subsidiaries. However, managementthe Company believes that foreign tax credits would largely offset any income tax that might otherwise be due.


47


WOODWARD
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
 
The changes in the valuation allowance were as follows:
 
                        
Year Ended September 30,
 2007 2006 2005  2008 2007 2006 
Beginning balance $(2,566) $(17,769) $(18,629) $(2,596) $(2,566) $(17,769)
Change in valuation allowance that existed at the beginning of the year  (116)  13,710      2,689   (116)  13,710 
Current activity related to deferred items  (302)        (222)  (302)   
Foreign net operating loss carryforward  388   1,493   860      388   1,493 
              
Ending balance $(2,596) $(2,566) $(17,769) $(129) $(2,596) $(2,566)
              
 
Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Both positive and negative evidence are considered in forming Woodward’s judgment as to whether a valuation allowance is appropriate, and more weight is given to evidence that can be objectively verified. Valuation allowances are reassessed whenever there are changes in circumstances that may cause a change in judgment. In fiscal 2008, 2007,


61


WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
and 2006, additional objective evidence became available regarding earnings in tax jurisdictions that had unexpired net operating loss carryforwards that affected Woodward’s judgment about the valuation allowance that existed at the beginning of the year.
 
Foreign net operating loss carryforward amounts in the preceding table included the translation effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
 
The reasons for the differences between Woodward’s effective income tax rate and the United StatesU.S. statutory federal income tax rate were as follows:
 
                        
Percent of pretax Earnings
              
Year Ended September 30,
 2007 2006 2005  2008 2007 2006 
Statutory rate  35.0%  35.0%  35.0%  35.0%  35.0%  35.0%
Adjustments of the beginning-of-year balance of valuation allowances for deferred tax assets     (16.2)     (1.5)     (16.2)
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit  2.0   2.4   2.5   1.5   2.0   2.4 
Foreign loss effect     0.3   0.1         0.3 
Foreign tax rate differences  0.1   1.1   (0.7)     0.1   1.1 
Foreign sales benefits  (0.4)  (2.3)  (3.3)     (0.4)  (2.3)
German tax law changes  2.3            2.3    
ESOP dividends on allocated shares  (0.5)  (0.7)  (0.8)
ESOP dividends on allocated stock shares  (0.4)  (0.5)  (0.7)
Research credit  (2.4)  (0.9)  (1.7)  (0.3)  (2.4)  (0.9)
Retroactive extension of research credit  (0.9)           (0.9)   
Change in estimate of taxes for previous periods and audit settlements  (10.2)  (1.3)  (2.5)  (1.2)  (10.2)  (1.3)
Other items, net  0.6   (0.1)  0.6   (0.1)  0.6   (0.1)
              
Effective rate  25.6%  17.3%  29.2%  33.0%  25.6%  17.3%
              
 
The changes in estimate of taxes for previous periods and audit settlements are primarily related to the favorable resolution of certain tax matters for 2008 and 2007, and related to increases in the amountsamount of certain credits claimed and changes in the amount of certain deductions taken as compared to prior estimates for 2006.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of FASB Statement 109” (“FIN 48”), which provides guidance on the financial statement recognition, measurement, reporting and disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits, either permanent or temporary, should be recorded in the financial statements. For those tax benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
Woodward adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on October 1, 2007, as required. The change in measurement criteria caused Woodward to recognize a decrease in the retained earnings component of stockholders’ equity of $7,702.


4862


 
WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
 
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
     
Balance at October 1, 2007 $20,509 
Tax positions related to the current year  5,819 
Tax positions related to prior years  (74)
Lapse of applicable statute of limitations  (3,678)
     
Balance at September 30, 2008 $22,576 
     
At September 30, 2008, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that would impact Woodward’s effective tax rate, if recognized, was $17,086. At this time, Woodward estimates that it is reasonably possible that the liability for unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by up to $8,308 in the next twelve months through completion of reviews by various worldwide tax authorities.
Woodward recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense. Woodward had accrued interest and penalties of $5,956 and $4,396 as of September 30, 2008, and October 1, 2007, respectively.
Woodward’s tax returns are audited by U.S., state, and foreign tax authorities and these audits are at various stages of completion at any given time. Fiscal years remaining open to examination in significant foreign jurisdictions include 2002 and forward. Woodward is subject to U.S. and state income tax examinations for fiscal years 2003 and forward.


63


WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
Note 4.5. Earnings per share
 
             
Year Ended September 30,
 2007  2006  2005 
 
Numerator:
            
Net earnings $98,157  $69,900  $55,971 
             
Denominator:
            
Basic  34,245   34,351   34,200 
Assumed exercise of stock options  999   840   927 
             
Diluted  35,244   35,191   35,127 
             
Income per common share:
            
Basic $2.87  $2.03  $1.64 
             
Diluted  2.79   1.99   1.59 
             
Net earnings per share — basic is computed by dividing net earnings available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Net earnings per share — diluted reflect the potential dilution that could occur if options were exercised.
The average shares outstanding decreased during fiscal 2008 as a result of shares repurchased under Woodward’s ongoing stock repurchase program. (See Note 1. “Operations and summary of significant accounting policies.”) Woodward repurchases common stock at times management deems appropriate, given current market valuations. The following is a reconciliation of net earnings to net earnings per share — basic and net earnings per share — diluted:
             
Year Ended September 30,
 2008  2007  2006 
 
Numerator:
            
Net earnings $121,880  $98,157  $69,900 
             
Denominator:
            
Basic  67,564   68,489   68,702 
Assumed exercise of stock options  1,996   1,998   1,680 
             
Diluted  69,560   70,487   70,382 
             
Income per common share:
            
Basic $1.80  $1.43  $1.02 
             
Diluted $1.75  $1.39  $0.99 
             
 
The weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding for basic earnings per share included the weighted-average treasury stock shares held for deferred compensation obligations of 279417, 558, and 828 for fiscal 2008, 2007, 414 forand 2006, and 391 for 2005.respectively.
 
The following outstanding stock options were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive:
 
                        
Year Ended September 30,
 2007 2006 2005  2008 2007 2006 
Options  318   358   5   398   636   716 
              
Weighted-average option price $37.09  $27.18  $28.27  $32.68  $18.54  $13.59 
              
 
Note 5.6. Inventories
 
                
At September 30,
 2007 2006  2008 2007 
Raw materials $10,808  $5,495  $16,221  $10,808 
Component parts  92,737   91,644   118,248   92,737 
Work in progress  36,220   30,124   41,047   36,220 
Finished goods  32,735   21,909   32,801   32,735 
          
 $172,500  $149,172  $208,317  $172,500 
          


64


WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
Note 6.7. Property, plant, and equipment
 
                
At September 30,
 2007 2006  2008 2007 
Land $12,469  $9,800  $13,343  $12,469 
Buildings and equipment  182,765   158,276   188,359   182,765 
Machinery and equipment  277,100   248,907   286,074   277,100 
Construction in progress  15,749   11,181   16,524   15,749 
          
  488,083   428,164   504,300   488,083 
Less accumulated depreciation  (329,085)  (303,988)  (335,649)  (329,085)
          
Property, plant, and equipment, net $158,998  $124,176  $168,651  $158,998 
          
 
Depreciation expense totaled $28,620 in fiscal 2008, $25,428 in fiscal 2007, and $22,064 in 2006, and $24,451 in 2005.


49


WOODWARD
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
Note 7. Goodwill
                 
  September 30,
  Additions/
  Translation Gains/
  September 30,
 
  2006  Adjustments  (Losses)  2007 
 
Turbine Systems $86,565  $  $  $86,565 
Engine Systems  36,703      1,033   37,736 
Electrical Power Systems  8,816   6,296   1,802   16,914 
                 
Consolidated $132,084  $6,296  $2,835  $141,215 
                 
                 
  September 30,
  Additions/
  Translation Gains/
  September 30,
 
  2005  Adjustments  (Losses)  2006 
 
Turbine Systems $86,565  $    —  $  $86,565 
Engine Systems  36,090      613   36,703 
Electrical Power Systems  8,380      436   8,816 
                 
Consolidated $131,035  $  $1,049  $132,084 
                 
fiscal 2006.
 
Note 8. Other intangibles — netGoodwill
 
                                        
 September 30, 2007 September 30, 2006  September 30,
 Additions/
 Translation
 September 30,
 
 Gross Carrying
 Accumulated
 Net Carrying
 Gross Carrying
 Accumulated
 Net Carrying
  2007 Adjustments Gains/(Losses) 2008 
 Value Amortization Amount Value Amortization Amount 
Customer relationships:
                        
Turbine Systems $44,327  $(13,791) $30,536  $44,327  $(12,314) $32,013  $86,565  $  $  $86,565 
Engine Systems  20,607   (8,003)  12,604   21,607   (7,030)  14,577   37,736   (675)  (1,430)  35,631 
Electrical Power Systems  2,609   (424)  2,185            16,914   675   (208)  17,381 
                      
Consolidated $67,543  $(22,218) $45,325  $65,934  $(19,344) $46,590  $141,215  $  $(1,638) $139,577 
                      
 
                                        
 September 30, 2007 September 30, 2006  September 30,
 Additions/
 Translation
 September 30,
 
 Gross Carrying
 Accumulated
 Net Carrying
 Gross Carrying
 Accumulated
 Net Carrying
  2006 Adjustments Gains/(Losses) 2007 
 Value Amortization Amount Value Amortization Amount 
Other amortizing intangibles:
                        
Turbine Systems $14,997  $(6,567) $8,430  $14,997  $(5,864) $9,133  $86,565  $  $  $86,565 
Engine Systems  21,828   (8,768)  13,060   21,743   (7,110)  14,633   36,703      1,033   37,736 
Electrical Power Systems  11,979   (5,776)  6,203   6,117   (4,736)  1,381   8,816   6,296   1,802   16,914 
                      
Consolidated $48,804  $(21,111) $27,693  $42,857  $(17,710) $25,147  $132,084  $6,296  $2,835  $141,215 
                      
Amortization expense totaled $7,496 in 2007, $6,953 in 2006, and $7,087 in 2005.


5065


 
WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
Note 9. Other intangibles — net
                         
  September 30, 2008  September 30, 2007 
  Gross Carrying
  Accumulated
  Net Carrying
  Gross Carrying
  Accumulated
  Net Carrying
 
  Value  Amortization  Amount  Value  Amortization  Amount 
 
Customer relationships:
                        
Turbine Systems $44,327  $(15,268) $29,059  $44,327  $(13,791) $30,536 
Engine Systems  20,607   (9,877)  10,730   20,607   (8,003)  12,604 
Electrical Power Systems  2,190   (386)  1,804   2,609   (424)  2,185 
                         
Total $67,124  $(25,531) $41,593  $67,543  $(22,218) $45,325 
                         
Intellectual property:
                        
Turbine Systems $  $  $  $  $  $ 
Engine Systems  12,705   (5,408)  7,297   16,163   (6,175)  9,988 
Electrical Power Systems  2,790   (1,220)  1,570   4,564   (4,374)  190 
                         
Total $15,495  $(6,628) $8,867  $20,727  $(10,549) $10,178 
                         
Process technology:
                        
Turbine Systems $11,941  $(4,113) $7,828  $11,941  $(3,715) $8,226 
Engine Systems  5,350   (2,853)  2,497   5,350   (2,318)  3,032 
Electrical Power Systems  1,338   (1,129)  209   1,351   (971)  380 
                         
Total $18,629  $(8,095) $10,534  $18,642  $(7,004) $11,638 
                         
Patents:
                        
Turbine Systems $  $  $  $3,056  $(2,852) $204 
Engine Systems                  
Electrical Power Systems  4,442   (693)  3,749   4,486   (335)  4,151 
                         
Total $4,442  $(693) $3,749  $7,542  $(3,187) $4,355 
                         
Other intangibles:
                        
Turbine Systems $  $  $  $  $  $ 
Engine Systems           315   (275)  40 
Electrical Power Systems  1,563   (200)  1,363   1,578   (96)  1,482 
                         
Total $1,563  $(200) $1,363  $1,893  $(371) $1,522 
                         
Consolidated $107,253  $(41,147) $66,106  $116,347  $(43,329) $73,018 
                         
Amortization expense totaled $6,830 in fiscal 2008, $7,496 in fiscal 2007, and $6,953 in fiscal 2006.


66


WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
 
Amortization expense associated with current intangibles is expected to be:
 
        
Year Ending September 30:
      
2008 $6,336 
2009  6,341  $6,184 
2010  6,197   6,059 
2011  5,963   6,017 
2012  5,963   6,017 
2013  5,839 
Thereafter  42,218   35,990 
      
 $73,018  $66,106 
      
 
Note 9.10. Short-term borrowings
 
Short-term borrowings reflect borrowings underinterest bearing advances subject to a cash pooling agreement on certain foreign bank lines of credit. The total amount available under these lines of credit, including outstanding borrowings, totaled $125,363 at September 30, 2007, and $117,691 at September 30, 2006, including the $100,000 revolving line of credit facility described in Note 10,Long-term debt. Interest on borrowings under the lines of credit is based on various short-term rates. Several of the lines assess commitment fees. The lines are generally reviewed annually for renewalaccounts and are subject to the usual terms and conditions appliedcollateralized by the banks.associated bank account balances. Total borrowing capacity varies daily in relation to net amounts on deposit in the associated bank accounts. The weighted-average interest rate for outstanding borrowings was 3.0% and 3.8%, 0.5% and 2.3% at September 30, 2008 and 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. For all three years, and in particular 2006, theThe rates were lower than is typical in the United StatesU.S. because of borrowingsborrowing rates available in foreign countries.
 
Note 10.11. Long-term debt and line of credit facilities
 
         
At September 30,
 2007  2006 
 
Senior notes — 6.39%, due October 2011; unsecured $53,572  $64,286 
Term note — 5.19%, due July 2008; unsecured  4,375   7,809 
Term note — 4.25% — 6.95%, due April 2008 to November 2011, secured by land and buildings  2,526    
Fair value hedge adjustment for unrecognized discontinued hedge gains  617   903 
         
   61,090   72,998 
Less: current portion  (15,940)  (14,619)
         
Long-term debt, less current portion $45,150  $58,379 
         
Long-term debt consisted of the following:
         
At September 30,
 2008  2007 
 
Senior notes — 6.39%, due October 2011; unsecured $42,857  $53,572 
Term note — 5.19%, due July 2008; unsecured     4,375 
Term note — 4.25% — 6.95%, due May 2009 to September 2012, secured by land and buildings  1,659   2,526 
Fair value hedge adjustment for unrecognized discontinued hedge gains  381   617 
         
   44,897   61,090 
Less: current portion  (11,560)  (15,940)
         
Long-term debt, less current portion $33,337  $45,150 
         
 
The senior notes are held by multiple institutions. The term notes are held by banks in Germany.
The current portion of long-term debt at September 30, 2008 includes $183 related to the fair value hedge adjustment for unrecognized discontinued hedge gains.
Required future principal payments of the senior notes and the term notes are as follows:
 
        
Year Ending September 30,
      
2008 $15,940 
2009  11,383  $11,377 
2010  11,201   11,197 
2011  11,068   11,064 
2012  10,881   10,878 
 
AsPrior to the issuance of September 30, 2007, Woodward had a $100,000 revolving line of credit facility that involved uncollateralized financing arrangements with a syndicate of U.S. banks. The agreement providedSFAS No. 133, “Accounting for an option to increase the amount of the line to $175,000Derivative Instruments and has an expiration date of March 11, 2010. Interest rates on


51


WOODWARD
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
borrowings under the agreement varied with LIBOR, the money market rate, or the prime rate. At September 30, 2007 and 2006, there were no borrowings against the line.
On October 25, 2007,Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 133”) Woodward entered into a Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, Wachovia Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Deutsche Bank Securities. This agreement increases the initial commitment from $100,000 to $225,000 and also increases the option to expand the commitment from $75,000 to $125,000, for a total of $350,000. The agreement generally bears interest at LIBOR plus 41 basis points to 80 basis points and expires in October 2012.
Woodward discontinued certain interest rate swaps that were designated as fair value hedges of its long-term debt. These actionsThe discontinuance of these interest rate swaps resulted in gains that are recognized as a reduction


67


WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
of interest expense over the term of the associated hedged debt using the effective interest method. The unrecognized portion of the gain wasis presented as an adjustment to long-term debt based on the accounting guidance in effect at the time the interest rate swaps were discontinued. If SFAS 133 had been issued and adopted when these interest rate swaps were entered into, the unrecognized potion of the gain would be presented in accumulated other comprehensive income rather than as an adjustment to long-term debt.
In September 2008, the Company entered into treasury lock agreements with a notional amount totaling $100,000 that qualified as cash flow hedges under SFAS 133. The objective of this derivative instrument was to hedge the risk of variability in cash flows related to future interest payments of a portion of the anticipated future debt issuances attributable to changes in the preceding table.designated benchmark interest rate. The hedges were closed-out prior to September 30, 2008 resulting in a gain of approximately $108 and the gain is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income as of September 30, 2008. The gain on the close-out of the treasury lock agreements will be recognized as a reduction of interest expense over the scheduled term of the hedged debt (seven years) issued on October 1, 2008 using the effective interest method.
 
Provisions of the debt agreements, including the $225,000 revolving line of credit facility described below, include covenants customary to such agreements that require Woodward to maintain specified minimum or maximum financial measures and place limitations on various investing and financing activities. The agreements also permit the lenders to accelerate repayment requirements in the event of a material adverse event. The most restrictive covenants require the maintenance of a minimum consolidated net worth, a maximum rationratio of consolidated debt to consolidated operating cash flow, and a maximum ratio of consolidated debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (“EBITDA”), as defined in the agreements. Woodward is in compliance with all covenants.
 
As of September 30, 2008, Woodward had a $225,000 revolving line of credit facility that involved unsecured financing arrangements with a syndicate of U.S. banks. The agreement provided for an option to increase the amount of the line to $350,000 and has an expiration date of October 2012. Interest rates on borrowings under the agreement vary with LIBOR, the federal funds rate, or the prime rate.
Woodward also had various foreign lines of credit. The lines are generally reviewed annually for renewal and are subject to the usual terms and conditions applied by the banks. Several of the lines assess commitment fees.
Borrowing capacity under lines of credit consisted of the following:
         
At September 30,
 2008  2007 
 
U.S. revolving line of credit facility $225,000  $100,000 
Various foreign lines of credit  19,903   19,867 
         
Total borrowing capacity under revolving lines of credit  244,903   119,867 
Less: borrowings outstanding  (—)  (—)
         
Available line of credit borrowing capacity $244,903  $119,867 
         


68


WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
Note 11.12. Accrued liabilities
 
                
At September 30,
 2007 2006  2008 2007 
Salaries and other member benefits $47,578  $28,673  $51,773  $47,578 
Warranties  5,675   5,832   7,232   5,675 
Legal matter     8,500 
Taxes, other than income  6,682   4,391   6,908   6,682 
Accrued retirement benefits  6,132   4,641   5,865   6,132 
Deferred compensation  3,685   4,352 
Other, net  14,138   10,488 
Other  13,813   17,823 
          
 $83,890  $66,877  $85,591  $83,890 
          
 
Provisions of the sales agreements include product warranties customary to such agreements. Accruals are established for specifically identified warranty issues that are probable to result in future costs. Warranty costs are accrued on a non-specific basis whenever past experience indicates a normal and predictable pattern exists. Changes in accrued product warranties were as follows:
 
         
At September 30,
 2007  2006 
 
Beginning balance, warranties $5,832  $5,692 
Accruals related to warranties issued during the period  4,524   6,107 
Accruals related to pre-existing warranties  387   (1,372)
Settlements of amounts accrued  (5,715)  (4,647)
Foreign currency exchange rate changes  647   52 
         
Ending balance, warranties $5,675  $5,832 
         
         
At September 30,
 2008  2007 
 
Warranties, beginning of period $5,675  $5,832 
Increases to accruals  7,477   4,911 
Settlements of amounts accrued  (5,800)  (5,715)
Foreign currency exchange rate changes  (120)  647 
         
Warranties, end of period $7,232  $5,675 
         


52


WOODWARD
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
Note 12.13. Other liabilities
 
                
At September 30,
 2007 2006 2008 2007 
Net accrued retirement benefits, less amounts recognized with accrued liabilities $46,145  $55,075  $42,103  $46,145 
Other, net  11,259   16,115 
Other  25,592   11,259 
          
 $57,404  $71,190  $67,695  $57,404 
          
 
Note 13.14. Retirement benefits
 
Woodward provides various benefits to eligible members of the company,Company, including contributions to various defined contribution plans, pension benefits associated with defined benefit plans, and retirement healthcare benefits. Eligibility requirements and benefit levels vary depending on employee location.
Woodward provides health-care and life insurance benefits to certain retired employees and their covered dependents and beneficiaries. Generally, employees who have attained age 55 and have rendered 10 or more years of service are eligible for these postretirement benefits. Certain retirees are required to contribute to plans in order to maintain coverage.
 
On September 30, 2007, Woodward adopted SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans” (“SFAS 158”), which requires the recognition of the funded status of defined pension and postretirement plans in the statement of financial position. The funded status is measured as the difference between the fair market value of the plan assets and the benefit obligation. For a defined benefit pension plan, the benefit obligation is the projected benefit obligation; for any other defined benefit postretirement plan, such as a retiree health care plan, the benefit obligation is the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation. Any over-funded status should be recognized as an asset and any underfunded status should be recognized as a liability.


69


WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
As part of the initial recognition of the funded status, any transitional asset/(liability), prior service cost/(credit) or actuarial gain/(loss) that has not yet been recognized as a component of net periodic cost should be recognized in the Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income section of the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, net of tax. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income will be adjusted as these amounts are subsequently recognized as a component of net periodic benefit costs in future periods.
The recognition of the funded status requirement and certain disclosure provisions of SFAS 158. See Note 1 — “Operations and summary158 were effective for Woodward as of significant accounting policies” for additional information regarding the end of fiscal 2007. Retrospective application of SFAS 158 was not permitted. The initial incremental recognition of the funded status under SFAS 158 that is reflected upon adoption in the Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income section of Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity was an after tax decrease to equity of $980.
The impact of adopting the adoptionprovisions of SFAS 158.158 on the components of the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2007 is as follows:
             
     Adjustment
    
  Before Application
  Increases/
  After Application
 
  of SFAS 158  (Decreases)  of SFAS 158 
 
Retirement Pension Benefits:
            
Deferred tax asset $1,980  $816  $2,796 
Total assets  1,980   816   2,796 
Pension obligation  (4,674)  (2,916)  (7,590)
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes  3,293   2,100   5,393 
Total stockholders’ equity  3,293   2,100   5,393 
Total liabilities and equity  (1,381)  (816)  (2,197)
Retirement Healthcare Benefits:
            
Deferred tax liability     (687)  (687)
Pension obligation  (46,494)  1,807   (44,687)
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes     (1,120)  (1,120)
Total stockholders’ equity     (1,120)  (1,120)
A. Defined Contribution Plans
Substantially all U.S. employees are eligible to participate in the U.S. defined contribution plan. Certain foreign employees also are eligible to participate in foreign plans.
 
Measurement assumptions —The amount of expense associated with defined contribution plans totaled $14,877 in fiscal 2008, $13,487 in fiscal 2007, and $13,684 in fiscal 2006. The amount of contributions associated with the multiemployer plan totaled $613 in fiscal 2008, $572 in fiscal 2007, and $635 in fiscal 2006.
B. Pension benefits associated with defined benefit plans
Woodward has defined benefit plans which provide pension benefits for certain retired employees in the U.S., the United Kingdom, and Japan. Approximately 575 current employees may receive future benefits under the plans. The defined benefit plans in the U.S. were frozen in January 2007 and no additional employees may participate in the U.S. plans and no additional service costs will be incurred. A September 30 measurement date is utilized to value plan assets and obligations for all of Woodward’s defined benefit pension plans.
The weighted average actuarial assumptions used in measuring the net periodic benefit cost and plan obligations of continuing operations for the three years ended September 30 were as follows:
                                     
  Retirement Pension Benefits  Retirement
 
  United States  Other Countries  Healthcare Benefits 
Year Ended September 30,
 2007  2006  2005  2007  2006  2005  2007  2006  2005 
 
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligation at September 30:
                                    
Discount rate  6.1%  5.6%  5.3%  4.8%  4.4%  4.1%  6.1%  5.6%  5.3%
Rate of compensation increase  N/A   4.5   4.5   3.8   3.4   3.2   N/A   N/A   N/A 
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost for years ended September 30:
                                    
Discount rate  5.6   5.3   5.8   4.4   4.1   4.4   5.6   5.3   5.8 
Rate of compensation increase  N/A   4.5   5.0   3.8   3.2   3.0   N/A   N/A   N/A 
Long-term rate of return on plan assets  8.0   8.0   8.0   5.8   5.6   6.0   N/A   N/A   N/A 
The discount rate assumption is intended to reflect the rate at which the retirement benefits could be effectively settled based upon the assumed timing of the benefit payments. In the United States, Woodward used the Citigroup Pension Liability Index and30-year U.S. treasury rate as benchmarks. In the United Kingdom, Woodward used the AA corporate bond index (applicable for bonds over 15 years) and government bond yields (for bonds over 15 years) to determine a blended rate to use as the benchmark. In Japan, Woodward used AA-rated corporate bond yields (for bonds of 12.5 years) as the benchmark. Woodward’s assumed rates do not differ significantly from any of these benchmarks.


5370


 
WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
The Investment objectives for the pension plan assets are designed to generate returns that will enable the pension plans to meet their future obligations. The precise amount for which these obligations will be settled depends on future events, including the life expectancy of the plan participants. These obligations are estimated using actuarial assumptions, based on the current economic environment. The strategy balances the requirements to generate returns, using the higher-returning assets such as equity securities with the need to control risk in the pension plan with less volatile assets, such as fixed-income securities. Risks include, among others, the likelihood of the pension plans becoming underfunded, thereby increasing their dependence on contributions from Woodward. The assets are managed by professional investment firms and performance is evaluated against specific benchmarks. In the U.S., assets are primarily invested in broadly diversified passive vehicles.
 
Woodward’s investment policies and strategies for plan assets focus on maintaining diversified investment portfolios that provide for growth while minimizing risk to principal. The target allocation ranges for plan assets in the United States are40-60% for United States equity securities,10-15% for foreign equity securities,U.S. and35-45% for debt securities. The target allocation ranges for plan assets in the United Kingdom, which represented about 80%81% of total foreign plan assets at September 30, 2007,2008, are47-57% 50% for debt securities,23-27% for United Kingdom equity securities and23-27% 50% fornon-United Kingdom equity debt securities. The remaining foreign plan assets are in Japan, and WoodwardWoodward’s investment manager uses asset allocations that are customary in that country. The expected long-term rates of return on plan assets were based on WoodwardWoodward’s current asset allocations and the historical long-term performance for each asset class, as adjusted for existing market conditions.
 
Salary increase assumptions are based upon historical experience and anticipated future management actions. In determining the long-term rate of return on plan assets, Woodward assumes that the historical long-term compound growth rates of equity and fixed-income securities will predict the future returns of similar investments in the plan portfolio. Investment management and other fees paid out of the plan assets are factored into the determination of asset return assumptions.
 
For retirement healthcare benefits, Woodward assumed net healthcare cost trend rates of 9.0% in 2008, decreasing gradually to 5.0% in 2011, and remaining at 5.0% thereafter. A 1.0% increase in assumed healthcare cost trend rates would have increased the total of the service and interest cost components by $305 and increased the benefit obligation at the end of the year by $4,966 in 2007. Likewise, a 1.0% decrease in the assumed rates would have decreased the total of service and interest cost components by $263 and decreased the benefit obligation by $4,277 in 2007.


54


WOODWARD
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
Net periodic benefit costs consists of the following components reflected as expense in Woodward’s Consolidated Statements of Earnings:
 
                                    
 Retirement Pension Benefits Retirement
                         
 United States Other Countries Healthcare Benefits  United States Other Countries 
Year Ended September 30,
 2007 2006 2005 2007 2006 2005 2007 2006 2005  2008 2007 2006 2008 2007 2006 
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
                                                            
Service cost $  $  $  $1,294  $1,360  $2,008  $297  $381  $1,708  $  $  $  $945  $1,294  $1,360 
Interest cost  1,034   1,142   1,082   2,554   2,200   2,102   2,474   2,753   3,761   1,122   1,034   1,142   2,814   2,554   2,200 
Expected return on plan assets  (1,317)  (1,180)  (1,090)  (2,424)  (1,998)  (2,069)           (1,362)  (1,317)  (1,180)  (3,005)  (2,424)  (1,998)
Amortization of unrecognized transition obligation           89   91   99          
Recognized losses  244   251   148   360   402   553   259   1,198   1,550 
Recognized prior service cost  (259)  1   1   (8)  (8)  (9)  (2,520)  (2,520)  (1,346)
Amortization of:                        
Unrecognized transition obligation           99   89   91 
Unrecognized losses  118   244   251   181   360   402 
Recognized prior service cost (benefit)  (260)  (259)  1   (10)  (8)  (8)
Contractual termination benefits           715   340                           715   340 
Cost of buyout events                    (871)      
Curtailment gain                          (7,825)
                                
Net periodic benefit cost $(298) $214  $141  $2,580  $2,387  $2,684  $(361) $1,812  $(2,152)
Net periodic benefit cost (benefit) $(382) $(298) $214  $1,024  $2,580  $2,387 
                                
 
An amendment was made to one of Woodward’s retirement pension benefit plans in 2006 that modified the amount of pension benefits payable to participants retiring after January 1, 2007. Amendments were also made to one of Woodward’s retirement healthcare benefit plans in 2005 that reduced the number of individuals who will qualify for retirement healthcare benefits in future periods. The effects of the amendments were presented in the preceding tables under the caption “curtailment gain.”
 
Contractual pension termination benefits were associated with workforce reductions of members covered by one of Woodward’s retirement pension benefit plans. The workforce reductions were related to the consolidation of manufacturing operations that were initially accrued for in 2004. The expense was recognized in the Engine Systems segment.
 
During fiscal 2007, Woodward provided an option for certain retirees to receive a cash settlement in lieu of future payments. The expense related to retirees who accepted the offer are included in the “cost of buyout events.”
As part of its retirement healthcare benefits, Woodward provides a prescription drug benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D. As a result, Woodward is entitled to a federal subsidy that was introduced by the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003. In fiscal 2007 and 2006, Woodward paid prescription drug benefits of $2,318 and $2,336, respectively. Woodward received $924 in 2007 (none in 2006). Woodward expects to receive $542 in 2008.
The amount of prior service cost and net actuarial loss that isamounts expected to be amortized from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income and reported as a component of net periodic benefit cost during fiscal 20082009 is $2,780 and $569, respectively.as follows:
         
  United States  Other Countries 
 
Net transition obligation $  $(74)
Prior service cost (benefit)  (260)  7 
Net actuarial losses (gains)  118   (124)


5571


 
WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
 
The following table provides a reconciliation of the changes in the projected benefit obligation and fair value of assets for the retirement pension plans for the years ended September 30, 2007 and 2006.plans:
 
                                
At or for the Year
 United States Other Countries  United States Other Countries 
Ended September 30,
 2007 2006 2007 2006  2008 2007 2008 2007 
Changes in projected benefit obligation:                                
Benefit obligation at beginning of year $18,716  $21,764  $57,072  $53,918 
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year $18,676  $18,716  $59,628  $57,072 
Service cost        1,294   1,360         945   1,294 
Interest cost  1,034   1,142   2,554   2,200   1,122   1,034   2,814   2,554 
Contribution by participants        122   139         69   122 
Net actuarial (gains) loss  (547)  (318)  (2,775)  1,531 
Net actuarial gains  (1,299)  (547)  (8,989)  (2,775)
Foreign currency exchange rate changes        3,958   1,834         (3,798)  3,958 
Benefits paid  (527)  (457)  (3,312)  (4,196)  (543)  (527)  (3,384)  (3,312)
Plan amendments     (3,415)      
Curtailment gain           (54)        (13)   
Contractual termination benefits        715   340 
Contractual termination cost (benefits)        (1,630)  715 
                  
Benefit obligation at end of year $18,676  $18,716  $59,628  $57,072 
Projected benefit obligation at end of year $17,956  $18,676  $45,642  $59,628 
                  
Changes in fair value of plan assets:                                
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year $16,709  $14,961  $40,812  $37,888  $18,438  $16,709  $52,276  $40,812 
Actual return on plan assets  2,256   1,205   2,504   3,534   (2,549)  2,256   (4,284)  2,504 
Foreign currency exchange rate changes        3,431   1,194         (3,794)  3,431 
Contributions by the company     1,000   8,719   2,253         2,582   8,719 
Contributions by plan participants        122   139         69   122 
Settlements        (1,631)   
Benefits paid  (527)  (457)  (3,312)  (4,196)  (543)  (527)  (3,384)  (3,312)
                  
Fair value of plan assets at end of year $18,438  $16,709  $52,276  $40,812  $15,346  $18,438  $41,834  $52,276 
                  
Reconciliation of accrued obligation and total amounts recognized:                                
Funded status at end of year $(238) $(2,007) $(7,352) $(16,260) $(2,610) $(238) $(3,808) $(7,352)
Unrecognized prior service cost  (3,149)  (3,409)  (56)  62 
Unrecognized net losses/(gain)  3,348   5,079   7,771   (10,392)
Unrecognized prior service cost (benefit)  (2,890)  (3,149)  37   (56)
Unrecognized net losses (gains)  5,842   3,348   19   8,046 
Unrecognized transition obligation        275   (359)        (145)   
Additional minimum liability           5,912 
                  
Net amounts recognized $(39) $(337) $638  $(21,037) $342  $(39) $(3,897) $638 
                  
Accrued benefit liability $(238) $(2,007) $(7,352) $(16,260) $(2,610) $(238) $(3,808) $(7,352)
Deferred taxes  76   635   2,720   (1,815)  1,122   76   986   2,720 
Accumulated other comprehensive income  123   1,035   5,270   (2,962)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)  1,830   123   (1,075)  5,270 
                  
Net amounts recognized $(39) $(337) $638  $(21,037) $342  $(39) $(3,897) $638 
                  
 
The underfunded status of the plans declined from $18,267 in 2006 to $7,590 in fiscal 2007 to $6,418 in fiscal 2008, primarily due to actuarial gains resulting, in part, from the increase in the discount rate and contributions made during the year.


56


WOODWARD
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
The following table provides a reconciliation of the changes in the projected benefit obligation and fair value of assets for the retirement healthcare benefits for the years ended September 30, 2007 and 2006.
         
Year Ended September 30,
 2007  2006 
 
Changes in projected benefit obligation:        
Benefit obligation at beginning of year $51,557  $57,374 
Service cost  297   381 
Interest cost  2,475   2,753 
Contribution by participants  2,663   2,675 
Net actuarial (gain)  (5,896)  (6,082)
Foreign currency exchange rate changes  188   170 
Benefits paid  (5,237)  (5,714)
Settlement (gain)  (2,284)   
Part D Medicare reimbursement  924    
         
Benefit obligation at end of year $44,687  $51,557 
         
Changes in fair value of plan assets:        
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year $  $ 
Special termination benefit cost  (737)   
Contributions by the company  3,310   3,039 
Contributions by plan participants  2,663   2,675 
Benefits paid  (5,236)  (5,714)
         
Fair value of plan assets at end of year $  $ 
         
Reconciliation of accrued obligation and total amounts recognized:        
Funded status at end of year $(44,687) $(51,557)
Unrecognized prior service cost  (5,418)   
Unrecognized net loss  3,611    
         
Net amounts recognized $(46,494) $(51,557)
         
Accrued benefit liability $(44,687) $(51,557)
Deferred taxes  (687)   
Accumulated other comprehensive income  (1,120)   
         
Net amounts recognized $(46,494) $(51,557)
         
The underfunded status of the plans declined from $51,577 in 2006 to $44,687 in 2007, primarily due to actuarial gains resulting, in part, from the increase in the discount rate, and benefits paid and contributions made during the year.
 
Woodward makes periodic cash contributions to its defined pension plans. The amount of expense associated with defined contribution plans totaled $13,487 in 2007, $13,684 in 2006, and $12,705 in 2005. The amount of contributions associated with multiemployer plans totaled $572 in 2007, $635 in 2006, and $867 in 2005.


5772


 
WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
 
The accumulated benefit obligation is the present value of pension benefits (whether vested or unvested) attributed to employee service rendered before the measurement date and based on employee service and compensation prior to that date. The accumulated benefit obligation differs from the projected benefit obligation in that it includes no assumption about future compensation levels. The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets were:were as follow, at or for the year ended September 30:
 
                                        
 Retirement Pension Benefits Retirement Healthcare
  United States Other Countries 
 United States Other Countries Benefits  2008 2007 2008 2007 
At or for the Year Ended September 30,
 2007 2006 2007 2006 2007 2006 
Projected benefit obligation $(18,676) $(18,716) $(59,628) $(57,072) $(44,687) $(51,557) $(17,956) $(18,676) $(45,642) $(59,628)
Accumulated benefit obligation  (18,676)  (18,716)  (56,097)  (50,374)  (44,687)  (49,114)  (17,956)  (18,676)  (43,497)  (56,097)
Fair value of plan assets  18,438   16,709   52,276   40,812         15,346   18,438   41,834   52,276 
 
Plan assets, expected benefit payments and funding — The allocation of pension plan assets as of the respective measurement dates is as follows:follows at September 30:
 
                        
 United States Other Countries  United States Other Countries 
At September 30,
 2007 2006 2007 2006 
 2008 2007 2008 2007 
Equity securities  60%  60%  44%  48%  52%  60%  42%  44%
Debt securities  40%  40%  38%  40%  48%  40%  58%  38%
Insurance contracts        5%  10%           5%
Other        13%  2%           13%
                  
  100%  100%  100%  100%  100%  100%  100%  100%
                  
 
Pension assets at September 30, 20072008 and 20062007 do not include any direct investment in Woodward’s equity securities.
 
Substantially all pension benefit payments are made from assets of the pension plans. Using foreign exchange rates as of September 30, 20072008 and expected future service, it is anticipated that the future benefit payments will be as follows:
 
            
 Retirement
   
 Pension Benefits           
   Other
 Retirement Healthcare
    Other
 
Year Ending September 30,
 United States Countries Benefits  United States Countries 
2008 $555  $2,978  $3,276 
2009  605   2,745   3,505  $604  $2,823 
2010  652   2,842   3,696   656   2,922 
2011  748   3,260   3,844   737   3,155 
2012  841   3,164   3,943   829   3,032 
2013 - 2017  5,735   17,119   20,955 
2013  922   3,228 
2014 - 2018  6,240   17,043 
 
Woodward expects its contributions for retirement pension benefits will be $0 in the United States and $2,913$2,426 in other countries in 2009.
C. Retirement healthcare benefit plans
Woodward has retirement healthcare benefit plans in the U.S. and the United Kingdom that provides healthcare benefits for approximately 1,100 retired employees and may provide future benefits to approximately 140 active employees, upon retirement. Benefits include the option to elect company provided healthcare insurance benefits to age 65 and a Medicare supplemental plan after age 65. The retirement healthcare benefit plans were


73


WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
frozen in January 2007 and no additional employees may participate in the plans. A September 30 measurement date is utilized to value plan assets and obligations for all of Woodward’s retirement healthcare benefit plans.
Net periodic benefit costs consists of the following components reflected as expense in Woodward’s Consolidated Statements of Earnings:
             
Year Ended September 30,
 2008  2007  2006 
 
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
            
Service cost $242  $297  $381 
Interest cost  2,452   2,474   2,753 
Recognized losses  192   259   1,198 
Recognized prior service cost  (2,520)  (2,520)  (2,520)
Cost of buyout events     (871)   
             
Net periodic cost (benefit) $366  $(361) $1,812 
             
During fiscal 2007, Woodward provided an option for certain retirees to receive a cash settlement in lieu of future payments. The expense related to retirees who accepted the offer is included in the “cost of buyout events.”
As part of our retirement healthcare benefits, Woodward provides a prescription drug benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D. As a result, Woodward is entitled to a federal subsidy that was introduced by the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003. Subsidies received are as follows:
             
Year Ended September 30,
 2008  2007  2006 
 
Prescription drug benefits paid $3,180  $2,318  $2,336 
Federal subsidy received  166   924    


74


WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
The following table provides a reconciliation of the changes in the projected benefit obligation and fair value of assets for the retirement healthcare benefits for the years ended September 30:
         
  2008  2007 
 
Changes in projected benefit obligation:        
Benefit obligation at beginning of year $44,687  $51,557 
Service cost  242   297 
Interest cost  2,453   2,475 
Contribution by participants  2,407   2,663 
Net actuarial gain  (3,493)  (5,896)
Foreign currency exchange rate changes  (88)  188 
Benefits paid  (6,342)  (5,237)
Settlement gain     (2,284)
Plan amendments  (2,531)   
Part D Medicare reimbursement  166   924 
         
Benefit obligation at end of year $37,501  $44,687 
         
Changes in fair value of plan assets:        
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year $  $ 
Special termination benefit cost     (737)
Contributions by the company  3,935   3,310 
Contributions by plan participants  2,407   2,663 
Benefits paid  (6,342)  (5,236)
         
Fair value of plan assets at end of year $  $ 
         
Reconciliation of accrued obligation and total amounts recognized:        
Funded status at end of year $(37,501) $(44,687)
Unrecognized prior service cost  (5,426)  (5,418)
Unrecognized net (gain) loss  (90)  3,611 
         
Net amounts recognized $(43,017) $(46,494)
         
Accrued benefit liability $(37,501) $(44,687)
Deferred taxes  (2,100)  (687)
Accumulated other comprehensive income  (3,416)  (1,120)
         
Net amounts recognized $(43,017) $(46,494)
         
The accumulated benefit obligation is the present value of healthcare benefits (whether vested or unvested) attributed to employee service rendered before the measurement date and based on employee service and compensation prior to that date. The accumulated benefit obligation differs from the projected benefit obligation in that it includes no assumption about future compensation levels. The projected benefit obligation and accumulated benefit obligation were as follows:
         
Year Ended September 30,
 2008 2007
 
Projected benefit obligation/Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation $(37,501) $(44,687)


75


WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
For retirement healthcare benefits, Woodward assumed net healthcare cost trend rates of 8.0% in 2009, decreasing gradually to 5.0% in 2011, and remaining at 5.0% thereafter. A 1.0% increase in assumed healthcare cost trend rates would have increased the total of the service and interest cost components by approximately $275 and increased the benefit obligation at the end of the year by approximately $3,939 in 2008. Likewise, a 1.0% decrease in the assumed rates would have decreased the total of service and interest cost components by $240 and decreased the benefit obligation by approximately $3,411 in 2008.
Using foreign exchange rates as of September 30, 2008 and expected future service, it is anticipated that the future benefit payments will be as follows:
     
Year Ending September 30,
   
 
2009 $2,756 
2010  2,924 
2011  3,012 
2012  3,079 
2013  3,137 
2014 - 2018  16,216 
Woodward also expects its contributions for retirement healthcare benefits will be $3,276approximately $2,783 in 2008,fiscal 2009, less amounts received as federal subsidies.


58


WOODWARD
Notessubsidies expected to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)be $473.
 
Note 14.15. Stock options
 
Stock options are granted to key management members and directors of the company.Company. These options are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of Woodward’s stock at the date of grant, and generally with a four-year graded vesting schedule and a term of ten10 years. Vesting would be accelerated in the event of retirement, disability, or death of a participant, or change in control of the company.Company, as defined. Woodward recognizes stock compensation on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the entire award for options with graded vesting schedules. Stock for exercised stock options is issued from treasury stock shares.
 
Provisions governing the stock option grants are included in the 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”) and the 2002 Stock Option Plan.Plan (the “2002 Plan”). The 2006 Plan was approved by shareholdersstockholders and became effective on January 25, 2006. No further grants will be made under the 2002 Plan. The 2006 Plan made 3,7057,410 stock shares available for grants made on or after January 25, 2006, to members and directors of the company, subject to annual award limits as specified in the Plan.Plan, of which 6,222 were available for future grants as of September 30, 2008.
 
The fair value of options granted during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2008, 2007, 2006, and 20052006 was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model with the following assumptions by grant year:
 
       
Year Ended September 30,
 2007 2006 2005
 
Expected term 7 years 7 years 7 years
Expected volatility:      
Range used 37.0% 37.0% 37.0% - 38.0%
Weighted-average 37.0% 37.0% 37.7%
Expected dividend yield:      
Range used 1.7% 1.7% 1.6% - 1.7%
Weighted-average 1.7% 1.7% 1.7%
Risk-free interest rate:      
Range used 4.4% - 5.0% 4.5% - 4.6% 4.0% - 4.2%
       
Year Ended September 30,
 2008 2007 2006
 
Expected term 7 years 7 years 7 years
Expected volatility 37.0% 37.0% 37.0%
Expected dividend yield 1.7% 1.7% 1.7%
Risk-free interest rate range used 3.73% 4.4% - 5.0% 4.5% - 4.6%
 
Historical company information was the primary basis for selection of the expected term, expected volatility, and expected dividend yield assumptions. The risk-free interest rate was selected based on yields from U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected term of the options being valued.


5976


 
WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
 
Changes in outstanding stock options were as follows:
 
                
   Weighted-Average
    Weighted-Average
 
 Number Exercise Price  Number Exercise Price 
Balance at September 30, 2004  3,253  $12.04 
Options granted  430   24.27 
Options exercised  (614)  10.52 
Options forfeited  (61)  17.33 
Options expired  (9)  24.57 
   
Balance at September 30, 2005  2,999   13.96   5,998  $6.98 
Options granted  367   27.03   734   13.52 
Options exercised  (460)  10.33   (920)  5.16 
Options forfeited  (2)  15.62   (4)  7.81 
      
Balance at September 30, 2006  2,904   16.18   5,808   8.09 
Options granted  387   37.55   774   18.78 
Options exercised  (604)  12.80   (1,208)  6.40 
Options forfeited  (49)  27.49   (98)  13.74 
      
Balance at September 30, 2007  2,638   19.88   5,276   9.94 
Options granted  446   32.74 
Options exercised  (1,329)  6.52 
Options forfeited  (6)  18.49 
      
Balance at September 30, 2008  4,387   13.29 
   
Changes in nonvested stock options during 2008 were as follows:
         
     Weighted-Average
 
  Number  Exercise Price 
 
Balance at September 30, 2007  1,747   14.90 
Options granted  446   32.74 
Options vested  (748)  13.45 
Options forfeited  (6)  18.49 
         
Balance at September 30, 2008  1,439   21.17 
         
 
At September 30, 2007,2008, there was $5,960$6,440 of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested awards, which Woodward expects to recognize over a weighted-average period of 1.81.2 years. Information about stock options that have vested, or are expected to vest, and that are exercisable at September 30, 2007,2008, were as follows:
 
                                
     Weighted-
        Weighted-
  
     Average
        Average
  
   Weighted-
 Remaining
      Weighted-
 Remaining
  
   Average
 Life
 Aggregate
    Average
 Life
 Aggregate
   Exercise
 in
 Intrinsic
    Exercise
 in
 Intrinsic
 Number Price Years Value  Number Price Years Value
Options vested or expected to vest  2,533  $19.47   6.9  $108,729   3,694  $12.04   5.0  $85,807 
Options exercisable  1,764   14.97   3.7   83,675   2,948   9.44   4.2   76,150 
Stock-based expense recognized under SFAS 123(R) was as follows (in thousands):
             
Year Ended September 30,
 2008 2007 2006
 
Employee stock-based compensation expense $4,588  $3,849  $2,942 
 
The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted was $14.73$13.09 for 2008, $7.36 for 2007, $10.45and $5.22 for 2006, and $9.40 for 2005. Other information follows:
             
Year Ended September 30,
 2007  2006  2005 
 
Total fair value of shares vested $3,114  $2,668  $2,072 
Total intrinsic value of options exercised  19,247   9,056   9,115 
Cash received from exercises of stock options  5,875   4,139   6,468 
Tax benefit realized from exercise of stock options  9,787   3,406   3,435 
2006.


6077


 
WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
 
Other information follows:
             
Year Ended September 30,
 2008  2007  2006 
 
Total fair value of stock options vested $3,841  $3,114  $2,668 
Total intrinsic value of options exercised  40,316   19,247   9,056 
Cash received from exercises of stock options  5,216   5,875   4,139 
Tax benefit realized from exercise of stock options  15,355   9,787   3,406 
Note 15.16. Accumulated other comprehensive earnings
 
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings which totaled $23,010 at September 30, 2007, and $12,619 at September 30, 2006, consisted of the following items:
 
                
Year Ended September 30,
 2007 2006  2008 2007 
Accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments:                
Beginning balance $17,100  $14,575  $27,614  $17,100 
Translation adjustments  16,874   4,073 
Translation adjustments, net of reclassification to earnings  (6,135)  16,874 
Taxes associated with translation adjustments  (6,360)  (1,548)  2,064   (6,360)
          
Ending balance $27,614  $17,100   23,543   27,614 
          
Accumulated unrealized derivative losses:                
Beginning balance $(484) $(661)  (331)  (484)
Proceeds from cash flow hedge, net of taxes  67    
Reclassification to interest expense  247   285   205   247 
Taxes associated with interest reclassification  (94)  (108)  (78)  (94)
          
Ending balance $(331) $(484)  (137)  (331)
          
Accumulated minimum pension liability adjustments:        
Accumulated minimum post-retirement benefit liability adjustments:        
Beginning balance $(3,997) $(3,010)  (4,273)  (3,997)
Minimum pension liability adjustment  3,789   (1,585)
Taxes associated with minimum pension liability adjustments  (3,085)  598 
Minimum benefit liability adjustment  3,125   3,789 
Taxes associated with benefit adjustments  (1,939)  (3,085)
Implementation of SFAS 158, net of taxes  (980)        (980)
          
Ending balance $(4,273) $(3,997)  (3,087)  (4,273)
          
Total accumulated other comprehensive income $20,319  $23,010 
     


78


WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
 
Note 16.17. LeasesCommitments and guarantees
 
Woodward has entered into operating leases for certain facilities and equipment with terms in excess of one year.year under agreements that expire at various dates. Some leases require the payment of property taxes, insurance, and maintenance costs in addition to rental payments. Future minimum rental payments required under these leases are as follows:
 
        
Year Ending September 30,
      
2008 $4,000 
2009  3,100  $4,400 
2010  2,500   3,800 
2011  2,200   3,100 
2012  1,700   2,900 
2013  2,500 
Thereafter  2,100   3,100 
 
Rent expense for all operating leases totaled $6,503 in fiscal 2008, $5,524 in fiscal 2007, and $4,610 in 2006, and $4,557 in 2005.fiscal 2006.
 
Woodward leases oneenters into unconditional purchase obligation arrangements (i.e., issuance of its facilitiespurchase orders, obligations to transfer funds in Germany from onethe future for fixed or minimum quantities of its officersgoods or services at rates it believesfixed or minimum prices, such as “take-or-pay” contracts) in the normal course of business to be market rates. The expenses totaled $816 in 2007, $747 in 2006,ensure that adequate levels of sourced product are available to Woodward. Future minimum unconditional purchase obligations are as follows:
     
Year Ending September 30,
  
 
2009 $132,977 
2010  2,222 
Guarantees and $771 in 2005.letters of credit totaling approximately $8,200 were outstanding as of September 30, 2008, some of which were secured by cash and cash equivalents at financial institutions or by Woodward line of credit facilities.
 
Note 17.18. Contingencies
 
Woodward is currently involved in pending or threatened litigation or other legal proceedings regarding employment, product liability, and contractual matters arising from the normal course of business. The companyCompany has accrued for individual matters that it believes are likely to result in a loss when ultimately resolved using


61


WOODWARD
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
estimates of the most likely amount of loss. There are also individual matters that management believes the likelihood of a loss when ultimately resolved is less than likely but more than remote, which were not accrued. While it is possible that there could be additional losses that have not been accrued, management currently believes the possible additional loss in the event of an unfavorable resolution of each matter is less than $10,000$10.0 million in the aggregate.
 
Among the legal proceedings referredMPC Products Corporation (“MPC”), which was acquired by Woodward on October 1, 2008, as described in Note 22, “Subsequent Events,” is subject to in the preceding paragraph, Woodward previously accrued $9,500 for a class action lawsuit filed inan investigation by the U.S. District CourtDepartment of Justice (the “DOJ”) regarding certain of its pricing practices prior to 2006 related to government contracts. MPC and the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois regarding alleged discrimination onhave reached a settlement in principle and are in the basisprocess of race, national origin,finalizing and gender at its Winnebago County, Illinois, facilities, most of which was accrued during fiscal 2006. On April 17, 2007, aobtaining approvals within the DOJ. Final disposition will be subject to acceptance and approval by the U.S. District Court Judge granted final approval of a Consent DecreeCourt. It is anticipated that included a $5,000any settlement of the class actionmatter would involve the payment of monetary fines and EEOC mattersother amounts by MPC. MPC is also in the process of working with the balanceU.S. Department of Defense to resolve any administrative matters that may arise out of the previously accruedinvestigation. There can be no assurance as to the resolution of these matters. The purchase price for MPC reflects the amount relatingagreed to legal andin principle by MPC with the U.S. Attorney. Any resulting fines or other associated expenses, all of which were paid duringsanctions beyond this fiscal year. Woodward does not expect to incur any additional settlement or legal expenses related to this matter.amount could have a material negative impact on Woodward.


79


WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
 
In addition, on April 30, 2007, Woodward was notified of an adverse arbitration ruling on a matter that was initiated by Woodward and outstanding since 2002. As a result of the ruling, Woodward incurred a pre-tax lossNotes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in its second fiscal quarter of $4,026 in relation to the arbitration finding which is included in selling, general, and administrative expenses.thousands, except per share)
 
Woodward files income tax returns in various jurisdictions worldwide, which are subject to audit. The company has accruedcurrently does not have any administrative or judicial proceedings arising under any Federal, State, or local provisions regulating the discharge of materials into the environment or primarily for its estimatethe purpose of protecting the most likely amount of expense that it believes may result from income tax audit adjustments.environment.
 
Woodward does not recognize contingencies that might result in a gain until such contingencies are resolved and the related amounts are realized.
 
In the event of a change in control of the company,Company, Woodward may be required to pay termination benefits to certain executive officers.
 
Note 18.19. Financial instruments
 
The estimated fair values of Woodward’s financial instruments were as follows:
 
                        
At September 30,
 2007 2006 
 At September 30, 
 2008 2007 
 Estimated
 Carrying
 Estimated
 Carrying
 
 Fair Value Cost Fair Value Cost 
Cash and cash equivalents $71,635  $83,718  $109,833  $109,833  $71,635  $71,635 
Investments in deferred compensation program  3,931   3,931       
Short-term borrowings  (5,496)  (517)  (4,031)  (4,031)  (5,496)  (5,496)
Long-term debt, including current portion  (60,473)  (72,095)  (44,836)  (44,516)  (60,473)  (60,473)
Obligations for deferred compensation program  (3,931)  (3,931)      
 
The fair values of cash and cash equivalents and short-term borrowings at variable interest rates wereare assumed to be equal to their carrying amounts. Cash and cash equivalents have short-term maturities and short-term borrowings have short-term maturities and market interest rates.
Investments and obligations related to the deferred compensation program used to provide deferred compensation benefits to certain employees are assumed to be equal to their carrying amounts since both the asset and the liability are marked to market value each reporting period.
The fair value of long-term debt at fixed interest rates was estimated based on a model that discounted future principal and interest payments at interest rates available to the companyCompany at the end of the year for similar debt of the same maturity. The weighted-average interest rates used to estimate the fair value of long-term debt at fixed interest rates were 6.0% at September 30, 2008, and 6.3% at September 30, 2007, and 5.4% at September 30, 2006.
Woodward holds cash and cash equivalents at financial institutions in excess of amounts covered by federal depository insurance.


62


WOODWARD
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)2007.
 
Note 19.20. Segment information:
 
BeginningDuring fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006, Woodward operated in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, Woodward realigned its operations into the following three business segments in order to better match its operations with its customers and served markets:segments:
 
 • Turbine Systemsis focused on developing and manufacturing systems and components that provide energy control and optimization solutions for the aircraft and industrial gas turbine markets.
 
 • Engine Systemsis focused on developing and manufacturing systems and components that provide energy control and optimization solutions for industrial markets, which includes power generation, transportation, and process industries.
 
 • Electrical Power Systemsis focused on developing and manufacturing systems and components that provide power sensing and energy control systems that improve the security, quality, reliability, and availability of electrical power networks for industrial markets, which includes power generation, power distribution, transportation, and process industries.


80


 
AllWOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
On October 1, 2008, Woodward completed the acquisition of MPC and Techni-Core, Inc. (“Techni-Core”) which formed the basis for its fourth business segment — Airframe Systems. Additional information forabout Airframe Systems and the years ended September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005 has been restated to reflect the realigned segment structure.acquisition is included in Note 22, “Subsequent Events.”
• Airframe Systemsis focused is focused on developing and manufacturing high-performance electromechanical motion control systems, including sensors, primarily for aerospace applications.
 
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1, Operations“Operations and summary of significant accounting policiespolicies.. Intersegment sales and transfers are made at established intersegment selling prices generally intended to approximate selling prices to unrelated parties. The determination of segment earnings does not reflect allocations of certain corporate expenses, which are designated as nonsegment expenses, and is before curtailment gain, interest expense, interest income, and income taxes.


63


WOODWARD
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
 
Segment assets consist of accounts receivable, inventories, property, plant, and equipment — net, goodwill, and other intangibles — net.
Summarized financial information for Woodward’s segments follows:
 
             
At or for the Year Ended September 30,
 2007  2006  2005 
 
Turbine Systems:
            
External net sales $502,557  $438,726  $414,467 
Intersegment sales  21,285   20,197   19,563 
Segment earnings  87,353   67,584   63,037 
Segment assets  330,969   317,688   284,126 
Depreciation and amortization  12,133   14,764   15,622 
Capital expenditures  12,490   14,540   11,818 
Engine Systems:
            
External net sales $414,076  $390,619  $392,079 
Intersegment sales  41,124   39,829   38,813 
Segment earnings  56,984   40,829   23,690 
Segment assets  250,908   231,485   253,302 
Depreciation and amortization  14,271   12,148   13,704 
Capital expenditures  13,164   14,098   12,389 
Electrical Power Systems:
            
External net sales $125,704  $25,170  $21,180 
Intersegment sales  55,662   51,016   48,568 
Segment earnings  20,294   4,475   1,921 
Segment assets  109,674   40,672   40,933 
Depreciation and amortization  5,572   1,455   1,623 
Capital expenditures  5,124   2,098   1,767 
The differences between the total of segment amounts and the consolidated financial statements were as follows:
             
Year Ended September 30,
 2007  2006  2005 
 
Total segment net sales and intersegment sales $1,160,408  $965,557  $934,670 
Elimination of intersegment sales  (118,071)  (111,042)  (106,944)
             
Consolidated net sales $1,042,337  $854,515  $827,726 
             
Total segment earnings $164,631  $112,888  $88,648 
Nonsegment expenses  (31,720)  (26,052)  (13,710)
Curtailment gain        7,825 
Interest expense and income, net  (923)  (2,339)  (3,655)
             
Consolidated earnings before income taxes $131,988  $84,497  $79,108 
             
             
At or for the Year Ended September 30,
 2008  2007  2006 
 
Segment net sales:
            
Turbine Systems
            
External net sales $577,304  $502,557  $438,726 
Intersegment sales  18,470   21,285   20,197 
             
Total segment net sales  595,774   523,842   458,923 
Engine Systems
            
External net sales  458,177   414,076   390,619 
Intersegment sales  41,141   41,124   39,829 
             
Total segment net sales  499,318   455,200   430,448 
Electrical Power Systems
            
External net sales  222,723   125,704   25,170 
Intersegment sales  66,571   55,662   51,016 
             
Total segment net sales  289,294   181,366   76,186 
Consolidated
            
External net sales  1,258,204   1,042,337   854,515 
Intersegment sales  126,182   118,071   111,042 
             
Total segment net sales $1,384,386  $1,160,408  $965,557 
             
Segment earnings:
            
Turbine Systems $116,196  $87,353  $67,584 
Engine Systems  56,471   56,984   40,829 
Electrical Power Systems  42,303   20,294   4,475 
             
Total segment earnings  214,970   164,631   112,888 
Nonsegment expenses  (31,346)  (31,720)  (26,052)
Interest expense and income, net  (1,714)  (923)  (2,339)
             
Consolidated earnings before income taxes $181,910  $131,988  $84,497 
             


6481


 
WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
 
                 
  2007 Fiscal Quarters 
  First  Second  Third  Fourth 
 
Total segment net sales:
                
Turbine Systems $117,005  $130,772  $132,297  $143,767 
Engine Systems  102,921   110,024   117,565   124,690 
Electrical Power Systems  32,302   45,223   49,240   54,601 
                 
Total $252,228  $286,019  $299,102  $323,058 
                 
Intersegment sales:
                
Turbine Systems $4,681  $5,344  $5,422  $5,838 
Engine Systems  9,109   10,275   10,498   11,243 
Electrical Power Systems  12,190   14,102   14,157   15,213 
                 
Total $25,980  $29,721  $30,077  $32,294 
                 
External net sales:
                
Turbine Systems $112,324  $125,428  $126,875  $137,929 
Engine Systems  93,812   99,749   107,067   113,447 
Electrical Power Systems  20,112   31,121   35,083   39,388 
                 
Total $226,248  $256,298  $269,025  $290,764 
                 
Segment earnings:
                
Turbine Systems $19,294  $23,830  $23,193  $21,035 
Engine Systems  12,577   11,785   15,398   17,225 
Electrical Power Systems  3,593   6,409   5,200   5,092 
                 
Total $35,464  $42,024  $43,791  $43,352 
                 
Earnings Reconciliation:
                
Total segment earnings $35,464  $42,024  $43,791  $43,352 
Nonsegment expenses  (8,243)  (9,918)  (5,998)  (7,561)
Interest expense and income, net  (569)  (696)  (653)  995 
                 
Consolidated earnings before income taxes $26,652  $31,410  $37,140  $36,786 
                 
             
At or for the Year Ended September 30,
 2008  2007  2006 
 
Segment assets:
            
Turbine Systems $371,275  $330,969  $317,688 
Engine Systems  242,350   250,908   231,485 
Electrical Power Systems  133,928   109,674   40,672 
             
Total segment assets  747,553   691,551   589,845 
Unallocated corporate property, plant and equipment, net  13,226   6,651   4,577 
Other unallocated assets  166,238   131,565   141,075 
             
Consolidated total assets $927,017  $829,767  $735,497 
             
Segment depreciation and amortization:
            
Turbine Systems $14,586  $12,133  $14,764 
Engine Systems  13,034   14,271   12,148 
Electrical Power Systems  6,002   5,572   1,455 
             
Total segment depreciation and amortization  33,622   31,976   28,367 
Unallocated corporate amounts  1,828   948   650 
             
Consolidated depreciation and amortization $35,450  $32,924  $29,017 
             
Segment capital expenditures:
            
Turbine Systems $17,710  $12,490  $14,540 
Engine Systems  14,817   13,164   14,098 
Electrical Power Systems  4,531   5,124   2,098 
             
Total segment capital expenditures  37,058   30,778   30,736 
Unallocated corporate amounts  4,041   1,206   977 
             
Consolidated capital expenditures $41,099  $31,984  $31,713 
             
         
At September 30,
 2007  2006 
 
Total segment assets $691,551  $589,845 
Unallocated corporate property, plant, and equipment — net  6,651   4,577 
Other unallocated assets  131,565   141,074 
         
Consolidated total assets $829,767  $735,497 
         
Differences between total depreciation and amortization and capital expenditures of Woodward’s segments and the corresponding consolidated amounts reported in the consolidated statements of cash flows are due to unallocated corporate amounts.
 
Two customers individually accounted for more than 10% of consolidated net sales in each of the fiscal years 20052006 through 2007.2008. Sales to the first customer were made by all of Woodward’s segments and totaled approximately 20%17%, 22%20%, and 23%22% of sales during the years ended September 30, 2008, 2007, 2006, and 2005,2006, respectively. Sales to the

65


WOODWARD
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
second customer were made by all of Woodward’s segments and totaled approximately 10%, 11%10%, and 13%11% of sales during the years ended September 30, 2008, 2007, 2006, and 2005,2006, respectively.
 
One customer accounted for more than 10% of accounts receivable as of September 30, 20072008 and 2006.2007. Accounts receivable from this customer totaled approximately 21%20% and 24%21% of accounts receivable at September 30, 2008 and 2007, and 2006, respectively.

82


WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
 
External net sales by geographical area, as determined by the location of the customer invoiced, were as follows:
 
                        
Year Ended September 30,
 2007 2006 2005  2008 2007 2006 
External net sales:
                        
United States $494,237  $449,617  $446,318  $528,318  $494,237  $449,617 
Europe  340,292   226,039   213,596   433,101   340,292   226,039 
Asia  133,738   123,639   120,799   198,086   133,738   123,639 
Other countries  74,070   52,220   47,013   98,699   74,070   55,220 
              
Consolidated external net sales $1,042,337  $854,515  $827,726  $1,258,204  $1,042,337  $854,515 
              
 
Property, plant, and equipment — net by geographical area, as determined by the physical location of the assets, were as follows:
 
                
At September 30,
 2007 2006  2008 2007 
United States $100,336  $93,340  $108,897  $100,336 
Germany  36,544   8,881   37,427   36,544 
Other countries  22,118   21,955   22,327   22,118 
          
Consolidated total property, plant, and equipment $158,998  $124,176 
Consolidated total property, plant, and equipment, net $168,651  $158,998 
          
 
Note 20.21. Supplementary financial data (Unaudited)
 
                                
 2007 Fiscal Quarters  2008 Fiscal Quarters 
 First Second Third Fourth  First Second Third Fourth 
Net sales $226,248  $256,298  $269,026  $290,765  $272,063  $305,753  $329,847  $350,541 
Gross profit(1)  68,504   80,126   82,971   81,916   81,233   95,376   97,892   100,707 
Earnings before income taxes  26,652   31,410   37,140   36,786   38,488   43,648   49,096   50,678 
Net earnings  17,887   20,262   23,974   36,034   25,325   29,714   32,414   34,427 
Earnings per share:                                
Basic  0.52   0.59   0.70   1.05   0.37   0.44   0.48   0.51 
Diluted  0.51   0.58   0.68   1.02   0.36   0.43   0.47   0.50 
Cash dividends per share  0.10   0.11   0.11   0.11   0.055   0.060   0.060   0.060 
Common share price per share:                
Common stock price per share(2):                
High  40.94   45.09   59.00   66.28   36.22   34.52   42.77   48.62 
Low  32.65   38.35   40.65   53.61   29.69   24.50   26.27   33.00 
Close  39.71   41.17   53.67   62.40   33.98   26.72   35.66   35.27 
 


6683


 
WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
 
                                
 2006 Fiscal Quarters  2007 Fiscal Quarters 
 First Second Third Fourth  First Second Third Fourth 
Net sales $195,634  $208,917  $217,053  $232,911  $226,248  $256,298  $269,026  $290,765 
Gross profit(1)  53,695   56,890   62,964   68,703   68,504   80,126   82,971   81,916 
Earnings before income taxes  19,119   17,177   21,579   26,622   26,652   31,410   37,140   36,786 
Net earnings(3)  12,427   11,466   28,918   17,089   17,887   20,262   23,974   36,034 
Net earnings per share:                                
Basic  0.36   0.33   0.84   0.50   0.26   0.30   0.35   0.53 
Diluted  0.35   0.32   0.82   0.49   0.26   0.29   0.34   0.51 
Cash dividends per share  0.10   0.10   0.10   0.10   0.050   0.055   0.055   0.055 
Common share price per share:                
Common stock price per share(2):                
High  29.30   33.95   38.88   34.07   20.47   22.55   29.50   33.14 
Low  25.10   28.34   27.53   27.45   16.33   19.18   20.33   26.81 
Close  28.67   33.25   30.51   33.54   19.86   20.59   26.84   31.20 
 
Notes:
 
1.Gross profit represents net sales less cost of goods sold.
 
2.Per share amounts have been updated from amounts reported prior to February 1, 2006,2008, to reflect the effects of a three-for-onetwo-for-one stock split.
 
3.Net earnings included net tax adjustments netting toof $10,293 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007. These adjustments included a benefit of $13,286 from the favorable resolution of issues with tax authorities and a charge of $2,993 for the adjustment of deferred taxes as a result of a statutory tax rate change in Germany.
4.Note 22. Subsequent Events
Net earnings included a deferred tax asset valuation allowance change that increased net earnings by $13,710 in the third quarter of 2006.A. Financing activities
Term Loan Credit Agreement — On October 1, 2008, the Woodward entered into a Term Loan Credit Agreement (the “Term Loan Credit Agreement”), by and among the Company, the institutions from time to time parties thereto, as lenders, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as administrative agent. The Term Loan Credit Agreement provides for a $150.0 million unsecured term loan facility, and may be expanded by up to $50.0 million of additional indebtedness from time to time, subject to the Company’s compliance with certain conditions and the lenders’ participation. The Term Loan Credit Agreement generally bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.00% to 2.25%, requires quarterly principal payments of $1,875 beginning in March 2009, and matures in October 2013.
The Term Loan Credit Agreement contains customary terms and conditions, including, among others, covenants that place limits on the Company’s ability to incur liens on assets, incur additional debt (including a leverage or coverage based maintenance test), transfer or sell the Company’s assets, merge or consolidate with other persons, make capital expenditures, make certain investments, make certain restricted payments, and enter into material transactions with affiliates. The Term Loan Credit Agreement contains financial covenants requiring that (a) the Company’s ratio of consolidated net debt to EBITDA not exceed 3.5 to 1.0 and (b) the Company have a minimum consolidated net worth of $400,000 plus 50% of net income for any fiscal year and 50% of the net proceeds of certain issuances of capital stock, in each case on a rolling four quarter basis. The Term Loan Credit Agreement also contains events of default customary for such financings, the occurrence of which would permit the lenders to accelerate the amounts due.

6784


Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureWOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
 
None.Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
 
The Company’s obligations under the Term Loan Credit Agreement are guaranteed by Woodward FST, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.
Item 9A.ControlsNote Purchase Agreement — Also on October 1, 2008, Woodward entered into a Note Purchase Agreement (the “Note Purchase Agreement”) relating to the sale by Woodward of an aggregate principal amount of $250.0 million comprised of (a) $100.0 million aggregate principal amount of Series B Senior Notes due October 1, 2013 (the “Series B Notes”), (b) $50.0 million aggregate principal amount of Series C Senior Notes due October 1, 2015 (the “Series C Notes”) and Procedures(c) $100.0 million aggregate principal amount of Series D Senior Notes due October 1, 2018 (the “Series D Notes” and, together with the Series B Notes and Series C Notes, the “Notes”) in a series of private placement transactions. On October 1, 2008, $200.0 million aggregate principal amount of Notes were sold, comprised of $80.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Series B Notes, $40.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Series C Notes and $80.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Series D Notes.
In connection with the Note Purchase Agreement, on October 30, 2008, Woodward sold an additional $50.0 million aggregate principal amount of Notes comprised of (a) $20.0 million aggregate principal amount of Series B Notes, (b) $10.0 million aggregate principal amount of Series C Notes, and (c) $20.0 million aggregate principal amount of Series D Notes in another series of private placement transactions.
The Notes issued in the private placements have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and may not be offered or sold in the U.S. absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration requirements.
The Series B Notes have a maturity date of October 1, 2013 and generally bear interest at a rate of 5.63% per annum. The Series C Notes have a maturity date of October 1, 2015 and generally bear interest at a rate of 5.92% per annum. The Series D Notes have a maturity date of October 1, 2018 and generally bear interest at a rate of 6.39% per annum. Under certain circumstances, the interest rate on each series of Notes is subject to increase if Woodward’s leverage ratio of consolidated net debt to consolidated EBITDA increases beyond 3.5 to 1.0. Interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually on April 1 and October 1 of each year until all principal is paid. Interest payments commence on April 1, 2009.
The obligations under the Note Purchase Agreement and the Notes rank equal in right of payment with all of Woodward’s other unsecured unsubordinated debt, including its outstanding debt under the Term Loan Credit Agreement.
The Note Purchase Agreement contains restrictive covenants customary for such financings, including, among other things, covenants that place limits on Woodward’s ability to incur liens on assets, incur additional debt (including a leverage or coverage based maintenance test), transfer or sell its assets, merge or consolidate with other persons, and enter into material transactions with affiliates. The Note Purchase Agreement also contains events of default customary for such financings, the occurrence of which would permit the Purchasers of the Notes to accelerate the amounts due.
The Note Purchase Agreement contains financial covenants requiring that Woodward’s (a) ratio of consolidated net debt to consolidated EBITDA not exceed 4.0 to 1.0 during any material acquisition period, or 3.5 to 1.0 at any other time on a rolling four quarter basis, and (b) consolidated net worth at any time equal or exceed $425.0 million plus 50% of consolidated net earnings for each fiscal year beginning with the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008. Additionally, under the Note Purchase Agreement, Woodward may not permit the aggregate amount of priority debt to at any time exceed 20% of its consolidated net worth at the end of the then most recently ended fiscal quarter.
Woodward is permitted at any time, at its option, to prepay all, or from time to time to prepay any part of, the then outstanding principal amount of any series of the Notes at 100% of the principal amount of the series of Notes to be prepaid (but, in the case of partial prepayment, not less than $1.0 million), together with interest accrued on such amount to be prepaid to the date of payment, plus any applicable make-whole amount. The make-whole


85


WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
amount is computed by discounting the remaining scheduled payments of interest and principal of the Notes being prepaid at a discount rate equal to the sum of 50 basis points and the yield to maturity of U.S. treasury securities having a maturity equal to the remaining average life of the Notes being prepaid.
A portion of the proceeds from the issuances in connection with Term Loan Purchase Agreement and the Note Purchase Agreement was used to finance the MPC acquisition.
Required future principal payments of senior and term notes outstanding at the end of 2008 and the $400,000 senior notes issued in October 2008 are as follows:
     
Year Ending September 30,
   
 
2009 $17,002 
2010  18,697 
2011  18,564 
2012  18,378 
2013  7,500 
Thereafter  364,375 
B. MPC acquisition
On October 1, 2008, Woodward acquired all of the outstanding stock of Techni-Core and all of the outstanding stock of MPC not held by Techni-Core for approximately $383.0 million. The Company paid cash at closing of approximately $334.7 million, a portion of which was used by the Company to repay the outstanding debt of MPC in an aggregate amount equal to approximately $18.6 million. MPC is an industry leader in the manufacture of high-performance electromechanical motion control systems primarily for aerospace applications. The main product lines include high performance electric motors and sensors, analog and digital control electronics, rotary and linear actuation systems, and flight deck andfly-by-wire systems for commercial and military aerospace programs. MPC will form the basis of a fourth Woodward business segment, Airframe Systems beginning in fiscal 2009. The cost of the acquisition may increase or decrease based on the outcome of a purchase price adjustment procedure customary to purchase agreements and the final determination of the direct acquisition costs. Woodward is in the process of finalizing valuations of property, plant, and equipment, other intangibles, and estimates of liabilities associated with the acquisition.
C. MotoTron acquisition
On October 6, 2008, Woodward acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of MotoTron Corporation (“MotoTron”) and the intellectual property assets owned by its parent company, Brunswick Corporation, that are used in connection with the MotoTron business for approximately $17.0 million in cash, subject to certain adjustments. MotoTron specializes in software tools and processes used to rapidly develop control systems for marine, power generation, industrial and other engine equipment applications. MotoTron is expected to be integrated into the Engine Systems business segment. The cost of this acquisition has not been finalized. The cost of the acquisition may increase or decrease based on the outcome of a purchase price adjustment procedure customary to purchase agreements and the final determination of the direct acquisition costs. Woodward is in the process of finalizing valuations of property, plant, and equipment, other intangibles, and estimates of liabilities associated with the acquisition.


86


Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
On December 6, 2007, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Audit Committee”) recommended and approved the dismissal of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. On that same day, the Audit Committee appointed Deloitte & Touche, LLP (“Deloitte”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Details of the events were filed under Item 4.01 ofForm 8-K on December 11, 2007. There have been no disagreements or any reportable events requiring disclosure under Item 304(b) ofRegulation S-K.
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures
 
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
We have established disclosure controls and procedures, as defined inRule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), which are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. These disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive officer (Thomas A. Gendron, president and chief executive officer)officer and president) and principal financial officer (Robert F. Weber, Jr., chief financial officer and treasurer), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
 
Thomas A. Gendron, our president and chief executive officer and president and Robert F. Weber, Jr., our chief financial officer and treasurer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisForm 10-K. Based on, and as of the date of, their evaluation, they concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in achieving the objectives for which they were designed as described in the preceding paragraph.effective.
 
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
 
We are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the company. We have evaluated the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting using the criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and, based on that evaluation, have concluded that the company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of September 30, 2007,2008, the end of the company’s most recent fiscal year.
 
PricewaterhouseCoopersDeloitte & Touche, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, conducted an integrated audit of the company’s 2007 consolidated financial statements and of the company’sWoodward’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2007,2008, as stated in their report included in “Item 89a — Financial StatementsControls and Supplementary Data.Procedures.
 
Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by our board of directors, management, and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements for external purposes in accordance with


87


generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
 
 • Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;Company;
 
 • Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the companyCompany are being made only in accordance with authorization of management and directors of the company; and
 
 • Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’sCompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
 
As permitted by Securities and Exchange Commission guidance, management has excluded the operations related to the Schaltanlagen-Elektronik-Geräte GmbH & Co. KG (“SEG”) business (acquired in October 2006) from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2007. The SEG operations combined


68


represented approximately nine percent of Woodward’s fiscal 2007 consolidated net sales and ten percent of Woodward’s consolidated total assets at September 30, 2007. The controls for these acquired operations are required to be evaluated and tested by the end of fiscal 2008.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
 
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the fourth fiscal quarter covered by thisForm 10-K that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


88


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
Item 9B.To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Woodward Governor Company
Fort Collins, Colorado
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Woodward Governor Company and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of September 30, 2008, based on criteria established inOther InformationInternal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2008, based on the criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended September 30, 2008 of the Company and our report dated November 19, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedule and included an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s adoption of the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.
Deloitte & Touche, LLP
Denver, Colorado
November 19, 2008


89


Item 9B.Other Information
 
There is no information required to be disclosed in a report onForm 8-K during the fourth quarter of 20072008 that was not reported onForm 8-K.
 
PART III
 
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
 
The information required by this item relating to our directors and nominees, regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Act of 1934, and regarding our Audit Committee is included under the captions “Board of Directors,” “Board Meetings and Committees — Audit Committee” (including information with respect to audit committee financial experts), “Share“Stock Ownership of Management,” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in our Proxy Statement related to the 20072008 Annual Meeting of ShareholdersStockholders to be held January 23, 200822, 2009 and is incorporated herein by reference.
 
Pursuant to General Instruction G (3) ofForm 10-K, theThe information required by this item relating to our executive officers is included under the caption “Executive Officers of the Registrant” in Part IItem 1 of this report.
 
We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer and our principal financial and accounting officer. This code of ethics is posted on our Website. The Internet address for our Website iswww.woodward.com,, and the code of ethics may be found from our main Web page by clicking first on “Investor Relations”Information” and then on “Corporate Governance,” and finally on “Woodward Codes of Business Conduct and Ethics.”
 
We intend to satisfy any disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 ofForm 8-K regarding an amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of this code of ethics by posting such information to our Website, at the address and location specified above.
 
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors in fiscal 2007.
Item 11.Executive Compensation
Item 11.Executive Compensation
 
Information regarding executive compensation is under the captions “Board Meetings and Committees — Director Compensation,” “Compensation Committee Report on Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,” and “Executive Compensation” in our Proxy Statement for the 20072008 Annual Meeting of ShareholdersStockholders to be held January 23, 2008,22, 2009, and is incorporated herein by reference, except the section captioned “Compensation Committee Report on Compensation Discussion and Analysis” is hereby “furnished” and not “filed” with this annual report onForm 10-K.


69


 
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
 
Information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related shareholderstockholder matters is under the tables captioned “Share“Stock Ownership of Management,” “Persons Owning More than Five Percent of Woodward Stock,” and “Executive Compensation — Equity Compensation Plan Information (as of September 30, 2007)2008),” in our Proxy Statement for the 20072008 Annual Meeting of ShareholdersStockholders to be held January 23, 2008,22, 2009, and is incorporated herein by reference.


90


Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
 
The information set forth under “Board Meetings and Committees — Related Person Transactions Policies and Procedures,” “Board of Directors” and “Audit Committee Report to Shareholders”Stockholders” in our Proxy Statement for the 20072008 Annual Meeting of the ShareholdersStockholders to be held January 23, 200822, 2009 is incorporated herein by reference except the section captioned “Audit Committee Report” is hereby “furnished” and not “filed” with this annual report onForm 10-K.
 
Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services
 
Information regarding principal accounting fees and services is under the captions “Audit Committee Report to ShareholdersStockholders — Audit Committee’s Policy on Pre-Approval of Services Provided by Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and — Fees Paid to Deloitte and Touche, LLP and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP” in our Proxy Statement for the 20072008 Annual Meeting of ShareholdersStockholders to be held January 23, 2008,22, 2009, and is incorporated herein by reference.


7091


 
PART IV
 
Item 15.  Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
 
(a) (1) Consolidated Financial Statements:
 
     
  Page Number
  
in Form 10-K
 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  3345 
Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the years ended September 30, 2008, 2007, 2006, and 20052006  3547 
Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 20072008 and 20062007  3648 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended September 30, 2008, 2007, 2006, and 20052006  3749 
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended September 30, 2008, 2007, 2006, and 20052006  3850 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  4052 
 
(a) (2) Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules —
 
     
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts  7596 
 
Financial statements and schedules other than those listed above are omitted for the reason that they are not applicable, are not required, or the information is included in the financial statements or the footnotes.
 
(a) (3) Exhibits Filed as Part of This Report:
 
     
 3(i) Restated Certificate of Incorporation filed as Exhibit 3(i) toForm 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2006, incorporated herein by reference
 3(ii) Bylaws, filed as an Exhibit 3.1 to Current Report onForm 8-K, dated November 16, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference
 4.1 Note Purchase Agreement dated October 15, 2001, filed as Exhibit 4 toForm 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2001, incorporated herein by reference
 10.1 Long-Term Management Incentive Compensation Plan, filed as Exhibit 10(c) toForm 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2000, incorporated herein by reference
 10.2 Annual Management Incentive Compensation Plan, filed as Exhibit 10(d) toForm 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2000, incorporated herein by reference
 10.3 2002 Stock Option Plan, effective January 1, 2002 filed as Exhibit 10 (iii) toForm 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2002, incorporated herein by reference
 10.4 Executive Benefit Plan (non-qualified deferred compensation plan), filed as Exhibit 10(e) toForm 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2002, incorporated herein by reference
 10.5 Form of Outside Director Stock Purchase Agreement with James L. Rulseh, filed as Exhibit 10(j) toForm 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2002, incorporated herein by reference
 10.6 Form of Transitional Compensation Agreement with Thomas A. Gendron filed as Exhibit 10 toForm 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2002, incorporated herein by reference
 10.7 Summary of Non-Employee Director Meeting Fees and Compensation, filed as an exhibit
 10.8 Material Definitive Agreement with Thomas A. Gendron, filed onForm 8-K filed August 1, 2005, incorporated herein by reference
 10.9 Material Definitive Agreement with Robert F. Weber, Jr., filed onForm 8-K filed August 24, 2005, incorporated herein by reference
 10.10 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan, effective January 25, 2006, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registration Statement onForm S-8 effective April 28, 2006, incorporated herein by reference
 10.11 Form of Transitional Compensation Agreement with Robert F. Weber, Jr., dated August 22, 2005, filed as exhibit 10.11 toForm 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2005, incorporated herein by reference
     
 2.1 Stock Purchase Agreement, dated August 19, 2008, by and among Woodward Governor Company, MPC Products Corporation, Techni-Core, Inc., The Successor Trustees of the Joseph M. Roberti Revocable Trust dated December 29, 1992, Maribeth Gentry, as Successor Trustee of the Vincent V. Roberti Revocable Trust dated April 4, 1991 and the individuals and entities named in Schedule I thereto filed as an Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report onForm 8-K, dated August 21, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
 2.2 Amendment No. 1, dated October 1, 2008, to the Stock Purchase Agreement, dated August 19, 2008, by and among Woodward Governor Company, MPC Products Corporation, Techni-Core, Inc., The Successor Trustees of the Joseph M. Roberti Revocable Trust dated December 29, 1992, Maribeth Gentry, as Successor Trustee of the Vincent V. Roberti Revocable Trust dated April 4, 1991 and the individuals and entities named in Schedule I thereto, filed as Exhibit 10.6 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 7, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
 3(i)(a) Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended October 3, 2007, filed as an exhibit
 3(i)(b) Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended January 23, 2008, filed as an exhibit
 3(ii) Amended and Restated Bylaws, filed as an Exhibit 3.1 to Current Report onForm 8-K, dated January 29, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference
 4.1 Note Purchase Agreement dated October 15, 2001, filed as Exhibit 4 toForm 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.1 Long-Term Management Incentive Compensation Plan, filed as Exhibit 10(c) toForm 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.2 Annual Management Incentive Compensation Plan, filed as Exhibit 10(d) toForm 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.3 2002 Stock Option Plan, effective January 1, 2002 filed as Exhibit 10 (iii) toForm 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.4 Executive Benefit Plan (non-qualified deferred compensation plan), filed as Exhibit 10(e) toForm 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.5 Form of Outside Director Stock Purchase Agreement with James L. Rulseh, filed as Exhibit 10(j) toForm 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference


7192


     
 10.12 Material Definitive Agreement with A. Christopher Fawzy, filed as Exhibit 10.12 toForm 10-Q for the nine months ended June 30, 2007, incorporated herein by reference
 10.13 Amended Executive Benefit Plan, filed as an exhibit
 10.14 Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement filed as an Exhibit 99.2 to Current Report onForm 8-K, dated November 16, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.15 Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, filed as an Exhibit 99.1 to Current Report onForm 8-K, dated October 25, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.16 Summary of Executive Officer Compensation, filed as an exhibit
 10.17 Summary of Dennis Benning Post Retirement Relocation Agreement, filed as an exhibit
 11  Statement on computation of earnings per share, included in Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 14  Code of Ethics filed as Exhibit 14 toForm 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2003, incorporated herein by reference
 21  Subsidiaries, filed as an exhibit
 23  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, filed as an exhibit
 31(i) Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of Thomas A. Gendron, filed as an exhibit
 31(ii) Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of Robert F. Weber, Jr., filed as an exhibit
 32(i) Section 1350 certifications, filed as an exhibit
     
 10.6 Form of Transitional Compensation Agreement with Thomas A. Gendron filed as Exhibit 10 toForm 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.7 Summary of Non-Employee Director Meeting Fees and Compensation, filed as an exhibit
 10.8 Material Definitive Agreement with Thomas A. Gendron, filed onForm 8-K filed August 1, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.9 Material Definitive Agreement with Robert F. Weber, Jr., filed onForm 8-K filed August 24, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.10 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan, effective January 25, 2006, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registration Statement onForm S-8 effective April 28, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.11 Form of Transitional Compensation Agreement with Robert F. Weber, Jr., dated August 22, 2005, filed as exhibit 10.11 toForm 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.12 Material Definitive Agreement with A. Christopher Fawzy, filed as Exhibit 10.12 toForm 10-Q for the nine months ended June 30, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.13 Amended Executive Benefit Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.13 toForm 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.14 Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement filed as Exhibit 99.2 to Current Report onForm 8-K, dated November 16, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.15 Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, filed as Exhibit 99.1 to Current Report onForm 8-K, dated October 25, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.16 Summary of Executive Officer Compensation, filed as an exhibit
 10.17 Dennis Benning Post Retirement Relocation Agreement, filed as Exhibit 10.17 toForm 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.18 Dennis Benning Promotion Letter dated October 1, 2008, filed as an exhibit
 10.19 Chad Preiss Promotion Letter dated October 1, 2008, filed as an exhibit
 10.20 Term Loan Credit Agreement, dated October 1, 2008, by and among Woodward Governor Company, the institutions from time to time parties thereto as lenders and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 7, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
 10.21 Note Purchase Agreement, dated October 1, 2008, by and among Woodward Governor Company and the purchasers named therein, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 7, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
 10.22 Amendment No. 1, dated October 1, 2008, to the Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 15, 2001 by and among Woodward Governor Company and the purchasers named therein, filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 7, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
 10.23 Amendment No. 2 and Consent, dated October 1, 2008, to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2007, by and among Woodward Governor Company, certain foreign subsidiary borrowers of Woodward Governor Company from time to time parties thereto, the institutions from time to time parties thereto, as lenders, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, Wachovia Bank N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank N.A., as syndication agents, and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., as documentation agent, filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 7, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
 11  Statement on computation of earnings per share, included in Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 14  Code of Ethics filed as Exhibit 14 toForm 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference
 21  Subsidiaries, filed as an exhibit
 23(i) Consent of current Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, filed as an exhibit

7293


23(ii)Consent of prior Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, filed as an exhibit
31(i)Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of Thomas A. Gendron, filed as an exhibit
31(ii)Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of Robert F. Weber, Jr., filed as an exhibit
32(i)Section 1350 certifications, filed as an exhibit

94


 
SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
Woodward Governor Company
 
  
/s/  Thomas A. Gendron
Thomas A. Gendron
President, Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer, and President
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
Date: November 29, 200719, 2008
 
/s/  Robert F. Weber, Jr.
Robert F. Weber, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 
Date: November 29, 200719, 2008
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
       
Signature
 
Title
 
Date
 
     
/s/  John D. Cohn

John D. Cohn
 Director November 29, 200719, 2008
     
/s/  Paul Donovan

Paul Donovan
 Director November 29, 200719, 2008
     
/s/  Thomas A. Gendron

Thomas A. Gendron
 Chairman of the Board
and Director
 November 29, 200719, 2008
     
/s/  John A. Halbrook

John A. Halbrook
 Chairman of the Board
and Director
 November 29, 200719, 2008
     
/s/  Michael H. Joyce

Michael H. Joyce
 Director November 29, 200719, 2008
     
/s/  Mary L. Petrovich

Mary L. Petrovich
 Director November 29, 200719, 2008
     
/s/  Larry E. Rittenberg

Larry E. Rittenberg
 Director November 29, 200719, 2008


7395


       
Signature
 
Title
 
Date
 
     
/s/  James R. Rulseh

James R. Rulseh
 Director November 29, 200719, 2008
/s/  Dr. Ronald Sega

Dr. Ronald Sega
DirectorNovember 19, 2008
     
/s/  Michael T. Yonker

Michael T. Yonker
 Director November 29, 200719, 2008


7496


WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
For the Years Ended September 30, 2008, 2007, 2006, and 20052006
(In thousands)
 
                                        
   Column C   Column E    Column C   Column E 
 Column B Additions      Column B Additions     
 Balance at
 Charged to
 Charged to
      Balance at
 Charged to
 Charged to
     
Column A
 Beginning of
 Costs and
 Other
 Column D Balance at
  Beginning of
 Costs and
 Other
 Column D Balance at
 
Description
 Year Expenses Accounts (a) Deductions(b) End of Year  Year Expenses Accounts(a) Deductions(b) End of Year 
Allowance for doubtful accounts:                                        
2008 $1,886  $415  $71  $(724) $1,648 
2007 $2,213  $167  $(331) $(163) $1,886   2,213   167   (331)  (163)  1,886 
2006  1,965   249   363   (364)  2,213   1,965   249   363   (364)  2,213 
2005  2,836   (98)  281   (1,054)  1,965 
 
 
Notes:
 
(a)Includes recoveries of accounts previously written off.
(b)Represents accounts written off and foreign currency translation adjustments. Currency translation adjustments resulted in decreasesa decrease in the reserve of $22$48 in 2005,fiscal 2008 and increases in the reserve of $187 in fiscal 2007 and $43 in 2006,and $187 in 2007.fiscal 2006.


7597


EXHIBIT INDEX
 
     
Exhibit
  
Number 
Description
 
 2.1 Stock Purchase Agreement, dated August 19, 2008, by and among Woodward Governor Company, MPC Products Corporation, Techni-Core, Inc., The Successor Trustees of the Joseph M. Roberti Revocable Trust dated December 29, 1992, Maribeth Gentry, as Successor Trustee of the Vincent V. Roberti Revocable Trust dated April 4, 1991 and the individuals and entities named in Schedule I thereto filed as an Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report onForm 8-K, dated August 21, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
 2.2 Amendment No. 1, dated October 1, 2008, to the Stock Purchase Agreement, dated August 19, 2008, by and among Woodward Governor Company, MPC Products Corporation, Techni-Core, Inc., The Successor Trustees of the Joseph M. Roberti Revocable Trust dated December 29, 1992, Maribeth Gentry, as Successor Trustee of the Vincent V. Roberti Revocable Trust dated April 4, 1991 and the individuals and entities named in Schedule I thereto, filed as Exhibit 10.6 to Current Report onForm 8-K filed October 7, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
 3(i)(a) Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended October 3, 2007, filed as an exhibit
 3(i)(b) Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended January 23, 2008, filed as an exhibit
 3(ii) Amended and Restated Bylaws, filed as an Exhibit 3.1 to Current Report onForm 8-K, dated January 29, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference
 4.1 Note Purchase Agreement dated October 15, 2001, filed as Exhibit 4 toForm 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.1 Long-Term Management Incentive Compensation Plan, filed as Exhibit 10(c) toForm 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.2 Annual Management Incentive Compensation Plan, filed as Exhibit 10(d) toForm 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.3 2002 Stock Option Plan, effective January 1, 2002 filed as Exhibit 10 (iii) toForm 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.4 Executive Benefit Plan (non-qualified deferred compensation plan), filed as Exhibit 10(e) toForm 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.5 Form of Outside Director Stock Purchase Agreement with James L. Rulseh, filed as Exhibit 10(j) toForm 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.6 Form of Transitional Compensation Agreement with Thomas A. Gendron filed as Exhibit 10 toForm 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.7 Summary of Non-Employee Director Meeting Fees and Compensation, filed as an exhibit
 10.8 Material Definitive Agreement with Thomas A. Gendron, filed onForm 8-K filed August 1, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.9 Material Definitive Agreement with Robert F. Weber, Jr., filed onForm 8-K filed August 24, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.10 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan, effective January 25, 2006, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registration Statement onForm S-8 effective April 28, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.11 Form of Transitional Compensation Agreement with Robert F. Weber, Jr., dated August 22, 2005, filed as exhibit 10.11 toForm 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.12 Material Definitive Agreement with A. Christopher Fawzy, filed as Exhibit 10.12 toForm 10-Q for the nine months ended June 30, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.13 Amended Executive Benefit Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.13 toForm 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.14 Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement filed as Exhibit 99.2 to Current Report onForm 8-K, dated November 16, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.15 Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, filed as Exhibit 99.1 to Current Report onForm 8-K, dated October 25, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.16 Summary of Executive Officer Compensation, filed as an exhibit
 10.17 Dennis Benning Post Retirement Relocation Agreement, filed as Exhibit 10.17 toForm 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference


     
 3(i) Restated Certificate of Incorporation filed as Exhibit 3(i) toForm 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2006, incorporated herein by reference
 3(ii) Bylaws, filed as an Exhibit 3.1 to Current Report onForm 8-K, dated November 16, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference
 4.1 Note Purchase Agreement dated October 15, 2001, filed as Exhibit 4 toForm 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2001, incorporated herein by reference
 10.1 Long-Term Management Incentive Compensation Plan, filed as Exhibit 10(c) toForm 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2000, incorporated herein by reference
 10.2 Annual Management Incentive Compensation Plan, filed as Exhibit 10(d) toForm 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2000, incorporated herein by reference
 10.3 2002 Stock Option Plan, effective January 1, 2002 filed as Exhibit 10 (iii) toForm 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2002, incorporated herein by reference
 10.4 Executive Benefit Plan (non-qualified deferred compensation plan), filed as Exhibit 10(e) toForm 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2002, incorporated herein by reference
 10.5 Form of Outside Director Stock Purchase Agreement with James L. Rulseh, filed as Exhibit 10(j) toForm 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2002, incorporated herein by reference
 10.6 Form of Transitional Compensation Agreement with Thomas A. Gendron filed as Exhibit 10 toForm 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2002, incorporated herein by reference
 10.7 Summary of Non-Employee Director Meeting Fees and Compensation, filed as an exhibit
 10.8 Material Definitive Agreement with Thomas A. Gendron, filed onForm 8-K filed August 1, 2005, incorporated herein by reference
 10.9 Material Definitive Agreement with Robert F. Weber, Jr., filed onForm 8-K filed August 24, 2005, incorporated herein by reference
 10.10 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan, effective January 25, 2006, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registration Statement onForm S-8 effective April 28, 2006, incorporated herein by reference
 10.11 Form of Transitional Compensation Agreement with Robert F. Weber, Jr., dated August 22, 2005, filed as exhibit 10.11 toForm 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2005, incorporated herein by reference
 10.12 Material Definitive Agreement with A. Christopher Fawzy, filed as Exhibit 10.12 toForm 10-Q for the nine months ended June 30, 2007, incorporated herein by reference
 10.13 Amended Executive Benefit Plan, filed as an exhibit
 10.14 Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement filed as an Exhibit 99.2 to Current Report onForm 8-K, dated November 16, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.15 Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, filed as an Exhibit 99.1 to Current Report onForm 8-K, dated October 25, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.16 Summary of Executive Officer Compensation, filed as an exhibit
 10.17 Summary of Dennis Benning Post Retirement Relocation Agreement, filed as an exhibit
 11  Statement on computation of earnings per share, included in Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 14  Code of Ethics filed as Exhibit 14 toForm 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2003, incorporated herein by reference
 21  Subsidiaries, filed as an exhibit
 23  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, filed as an exhibit
 31(i) Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of Thomas A. Gendron, filed as an exhibit
 31(ii) Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of Robert F. Weber, Jr., filed as an exhibit
 32(i) Section 1350 certifications, filed as an exhibit
     
Exhibit
  
Number 
Description
 
 10.18 Dennis Benning Confirmation Letter dated October 1, 2008, filed as an exhibit
 10.19 Chad Preiss Confirmation Letter dated October 1, 2008, filed as an exhibit
 10.20 Term Loan Credit Agreement, dated October 1, 2008, by and among Woodward Governor Company, the institutions from time to time parties thereto as lenders and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report onForm 8-K filed October 7, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.21 Note Purchase Agreement, dated October 1, 2008, by and among Woodward Governor Company and the purchasers named therein, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Current Report onForm 8-K filed October 7, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.22 Amendment No. 1, dated October 1, 2008, to the Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 15, 2001 by and among Woodward Governor Company and the purchasers named therein, filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Current Report onForm 8-K filed October 7, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference
 10.23 Amendment No. 2 and Consent, dated October 1, 2008, to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2007, by and among Woodward Governor Company, certain foreign subsidiary borrowers of Woodward Governor Company from time to time parties thereto, the institutions from time to time parties thereto, as lenders, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, Wachovia Bank N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank N.A., as syndication agents, and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., as documentation agent, filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Current Report onForm 8-K filed October 7, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference
 11  Statement on computation of earnings per share, included in Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 14  Code of Ethics filed as Exhibit 14 toForm 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference
 21  Subsidiaries, filed as an exhibit
 23(i) Consent of current Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, filed as an exhibit
 23(ii) Consent of prior Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, filed as an exhibit
 31(i) Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of Thomas A. Gendron, filed as an exhibit
 31(ii) Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of Robert F. Weber, Jr., filed as an exhibit
 32(i) Section 1350 certifications, filed as an exhibit