UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, ~~2007~~2009

Commission File Number 001-33401

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)


Delaware		~~20-5490327~~
(State or other jurisdiction		~~(I.R.S. Employer~~
of incorporation or organization)		20-5490327 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)


3900 Dallas Parkway Suite 500
~~Suite 500~~
Plano, Texas		~~75093~~
(Address of principal executive offices)		75093 (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (972) 665-1000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yeso Noþ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15 (d) of the Act. Yeso Noþ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yeso Noo

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

~~Large accelerated filer~~o ~~Accelerated filer~~o ~~Non-accelerated filer~~þ ~~Smaller reporting company~~o

~~(Do~~


Large accelerated filero		Accelerated filerþ		Non-accelerated filero (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting companyo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yeso Noþ

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity ~~held~~owned by non-affiliates of the registrant on June ~~29, 2007,~~30, 2009, computed by reference to the closing price for the registrant’s common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on such date was ~~$537,746,840 (30,605,967~~$366,449,138 (32,371,832 shares at a closing price per share of ~~$17.57)~~$11.32).

As of February ~~29, 2008, 107,056,131~~28, 2010, 111,288,314 shares of common stock were outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Certain portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement, in connection with its ~~2008~~2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed within 120 days of December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, are incorporated by reference into Part III, Items 10-14, of this annual report on Form 10-K.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This annual report on Form 10-K includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as ~~amended, based on~~amended. The “forward looking statements” include our current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections about our business and our industry. They include statements relating to:

	•		future revenues, expenses and profitability;

	•		the future development and expected growth of our business;

	•		projected capital expenditures;

	•		attendance at movies generally or in any of the markets in which we operate;

	•		the number or diversity of popular movies released and our ability to successfully license and exhibit popular films;

	•		national and international growth in our industry;

	•		competition from other exhibitors and alternative forms of entertainment; and

	•		determinations in lawsuits in which we are defendants.

You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of words such as “may,” “should,” “will,” “could,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “plans,” “expects,” “future” and “intends” and similar expressions which are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control and difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements. In evaluating forward-looking statements, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described in the “Risk Factors” section in Item 1A of this Form 10-K and elsewhere in this Form 10-K. All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements and risk factors contained in this Form 10-K. Forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-K reflect our view only as of the date of this Form 10-K. We undertake no obligation, other than as required by law, to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Certain Definitions

Unless the context otherwise requires, all references to “we,” “our,” “us,” the “issuer” or “Cinemark” relate to Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, including Cinemark, Inc., Cinemark USA, Inc. and Century Theatres, Inc. Unless otherwise specified, all operating and other statistical data for the U.S. include one theatre in Canada. All references to Latin America are to Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Guatemala and Peru. Unless otherwise specified, all operating and other statistical data are as of and for the year ended December 31, ~~2007.~~2009.

PART I

~~Item 1. Business~~


Item 1.		Business

Our Company

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries, ~~(the “Company”) are leaders~~or the Company, is the second largest motion picture exhibitor in the ~~motion picture exhibition industry~~world in terms of both ~~revenues~~attendance and the number of screens in operation, with theatres in the United States, (“or U.S.”), Canada, Brazil, Mexico, Chile, Colombia, Argentina, ~~Brazil, Chile,~~ Ecuador, Peru, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama and ~~Colombia. The Company~~Guatemala. We also managed additional theatres in the U.S., ~~Canada,~~ Brazil and Colombia during the year ended December 31, ~~2007.~~

On April 2, 2004, an affiliate of Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC, (“MDP”), acquired approximately 83% of the capital stock of Cinemark, Inc., pursuant to which a newly formed subsidiary owned by an affiliate of MDP was merged with and into Cinemark, Inc., with Cinemark, Inc. continuing as the surviving corporation (the “MDP Merger”). Simultaneously, an affiliate of MDP purchased shares of Cinemark, Inc.’s common stock for $518.2 million in cash and became Cinemark, Inc.’s controlling stockholder. Lee Roy Mitchell, Chairman and then Chief Executive Officer, the Mitchell Special Trust and certain members of management collectively retained a minority ownership of Cinemark, Inc.’s capital stock. In December 2004, MDP sold a portion of its stock in Cinemark, Inc. to outside investors and in July 2005, Cinemark, Inc. issued additional shares to another outside investor.2009.

On August 2, 2006, Cinemark Holdings, Inc. was formed as the Delaware holding company of Cinemark, Inc. ~~On August 7,~~The Cinemark Share Exchange was completed on October 5, 2006, under which the Cinemark, Inc. stockholders ~~entered into a share exchange agreement pursuant to which they agreed to exchange~~exchanged their shares of Class A common stock for an equal number of shares of common stock of Cinemark Holdings, Inc. ~~(“Cinemark Share Exchange”). The Cinemark Share Exchange was completed on October 5, 2006~~ and facilitated the acquisition of Century Theatres, Inc., ~~a national theatre chain headquartered in San Rafael, California with 77 theatres and 1,017 screens in 12 states, for a purchase price of approximately $681 million and~~or the ~~assumption of approximately $360 million of~~ Century debt (“Century Acquisition”). On October 5, 2006, Cinemark, Inc. became a wholly owned subsidiary of Cinemark Holdings, Inc. Prior to October 5, 2006, Cinemark Holdings, Inc. had no assets, liabilities or operations. The accompanying consolidated financial statements are reflective of the change in reporting entity that occurred as a result of the Cinemark Share Exchange. Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s consolidated financial statements reflect the accounting basis of its stockholders for all periods presented.Acquisition. On April 24, 2007, Cinemark Holdings, Inc. completed an initial public offering of its common stock. Effective December 11, 2009, Cinemark, Inc. was merged into Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and Cinemark Holdings, Inc. became the holding company of Cinemark USA, Inc.

As of December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, we managed our business under two reportable operating segments – U.S. markets and international markets, in accordance with ~~Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131 “~~FASB ASC Topic 280,~~Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.~~Segment Reporting.” See Note 2223 to the consolidated financial statements.

Our principal executive offices are at 3900 Dallas Parkway, Suite 500, Plano, Texas 75093. Our telephone number is (972) 665-1000. We maintain a corporate website atwww.cinemark.com.Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments, are available on our website free of charge under the heading “Investor Relations – SEC Filings” as soon as practicable after such reports are filed or furnished electronically to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Description of Business

We are ~~a leader~~the second largest motion picture exhibitor in the ~~motion picture exhibition industry with 408~~world in terms of both attendance and the number of screens in operation. We operated 424 theatres and ~~4,665~~4,896 screens in the U.S. and Latin ~~America.~~America as of December 31, 2009, and approximately 236.7 million patrons attended our theatres worldwide during the year ended December 31, 2009. Our circuit is the third largest in the U.S. with ~~287~~294 theatres and ~~3,654~~3,830 screens in ~~38 states.~~39 states and one Canadian province. We are the most geographically diverse circuit in Latin America with ~~121~~130 theatres and ~~1,011~~1,066 screens in 1213 countries. ~~During the year ended December 31, 2007, over 212 million patrons attended our theatres.~~ Our modern theatre circuit features stadium seating ~~for~~in approximately ~~81%~~84% of our first-run ~~screens.~~auditoriums.

We selectively build or acquire new theatres in markets where we can establish and maintain a ~~leading~~strong market position. We believe our portfolio of modern theatres provides a preferred destination for moviegoers and contributes to our significant cash flows from operating activities. Our significant presence in the U.S. and Latin America has made us an important distribution channel for movie studios, particularly as they look to ~~increase revenues generated in Latin~~

Motion Picture Industry Overview

The motion picture industry has begun a transition to digital projection technology. Digital projection technology allows filmmakers the ability to showcase imaginative works of art exactly as they were intended, with incredible realism and detail and in a range of up to 35 trillion colors. Because digital features aren’t susceptible to scratching and fading, digital presentations will always remain clear and sharp every time they are shown. A digitally produced or digitally converted movie can be distributed to theatres via satellite, physical media, or fiber optic networks. The digitized movie is stored on a computer/server which “serves” it to a digital projector for each screening of the movie and due to its format, it enables us to more efficiently move films between auditoriums within a theatre as demand increases or decreases for each film.

Digital projection also allows for the presentation of 3-D content and alternative entertainment such as concert events, the opera, special live documentaries and sports programs. Fourteen films released during 2009 were available in 3-D format and at least twenty 3-D films are expected to be released during 2010. Current 3-D technology offers a premium experience with crisp, bright, ultra-realistic images that immerse the patron into a film. A premium is generally charged for a 3-D presentation.

Domestic Markets

The U.S. motion picture exhibition industry has a track record of long-term growth, with box office revenues growing at aan estimated CAGR of ~~5.1% over the last 15 years.~~3.4% from 1998 to 2008. Against this background of steady long-term growth, the exhibition industry has experienced periodic short-term increases and decreases in attendance, and consequently box office revenues. ~~In 2007,~~

As of the ~~motion picture exhibition industry continued to experience growth with~~date of this report, MPAA Worldwide Market Research (or MPAA) had not yet released the 2009 box office ~~revenues increasing 5.4% over 2006, compared to an increase of 3.5% in 2006 over 2005. We believe box office revenues will continue to perform well in 2008 with a solid slate of films, including~~Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian, The Dark Knight, Wall-E, Hancock, The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor~~and the release of 3-D movies such as~~~~Hannah Montana & Miley Cyrus: Best of Both Worlds~~~~and~~~~Journey to the Center of the Earth~~~~. In 2009, a broad slate of 3-D films is expected, including~~~~Monsters vs. Aliens, Ice Age 3,~~~~and~~~~Avatar.~~

information. The following table represents the results of a survey by MPAA ~~Worldwide Market Research (“MPAA”),~~ published during March ~~2008,~~2009, outlining the historical trends in U.S. box office revenues for the ten year period from ~~1997~~1998 to ~~2007:~~2008:


	U.S. Box						U.S. Box
	Office Revenues		Attendance		Average Ticket		Office Revenues		Attendance		Average Ticket
Year	($ in millions)		(in millions)		Price		($ in millions)		(in millions)		Price
1997	$	6,216		1,354	$	4.59
1998	$	6,760		1,438	$	4.69	$	6,760		1,438	$	4.69
1999	$	7,314		1,440	$	5.08	$	7,314		1,440	$	5.08
2000	$	7,468		1,383	$	5.39	$	7,468		1,383	$	5.39
2001	$	8,125		1,438	$	5.66	$	8,125		1,438	$	5.66
2002	$	9,272		1,599	$	5.81	$	9,272		1,599	$	5.81
2003	$	9,165		1,521	$	6.03	$	9,165		1,521	$	6.03
2004	$	9,215		1,484	$	6.21	$	9,215		1,484	$	6.21
2005	$	8,832		1,376	$	6.41	$	8,832		1,376	$	6.41
2006	$	9,138		1,395	$	6.55	$	9,138		1,395	$	6.55
2007	$	9,629		1,400	$	6.88	$	9,629		1,400	$	6.88
2008							$	9,791		1,364	$	7.18

We believe many international markets for theatrical exhibition have historically been underserved and that certain of these markets, especially those in Latin America, will continue to experience growth as additional modern stadium-styled theatres are introduced.

Drivers of Continued Industry Success

We believe the following market trends will drive the continued growth and strength of our industry:

Importance of Theatrical Success in Establishing Movie Brands and Subsequent Markets. Theatrical exhibition is the primary distribution channel for new motion picture releases. A successful theatrical release which “brands” a film is one of the major factors in determining its success in “downstream” markets, such as DVDs, network and syndicated television, video on-demand, pay-per-view television and ~~downloading utilizing~~ the Internet.

Increased Importance of International Markets for Box Office Success.International markets continue to be an increasingly important component of the overall box office revenues generated by Hollywood films, accounting for ~~$17.1~~$18.3 billion, or ~~64%~~approximately 65% of ~~2007~~2008 total worldwide box office revenues according to MPAA. (As of the date of this report, MPAA had not yet released the 2009 industry information.) With the continued growth of the international motion picture exhibition industry, we believe the relative contribution of markets outside North America will become even more significant.

~~Increased Investment in Production and Marketing of Films by Distributors~~.~~As a result~~ Many of the ~~additional revenues generated by domestic,~~top U.S. films released during 2009 also performed exceptionally well in international markets. Such films includeHarry Potter and ~~“downstream”~~the Half-Blood Prince, which grossed approximately $632 million in international markets, ~~studios have increased production~~Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaur, which grossed approximately $691 million in international markets, and ~~marketing expenditures at a CAGR of 8.2% and 10.1%~~Avatar, ~~respectively, since 2004, according~~which has grossed approximately $1.9 billion in international markets to ~~MPAA. Production and marketing expenditures for 2007 increased by 18.1% and 12.7%, respectively over 2006.~~date.

Stable ~~Long-term~~Long-Term Attendance Trends.We believe that long-term trends in motion picture attendance in the U.S. will continue to benefit the industry. Despite historical economic and industry cycles, domestic attendance has grown at a 1.6% CAGR over the last 15 years to 1.4 billion patrons in 2007. According to Nielsen Entertainment/NRG, 77% of moviegoers stated their overall theatre experience in 2007 was time and money well spent. Additionally, younger moviegoers in the U.S. continue to be the most frequent patrons.

~~Reduced Seasonality of Revenues.~~~~Box office revenues have historically been highly seasonal, with a majority of blockbusters being released~~Even during the ~~summer and year-end holiday season. In~~ recent ~~years,~~recessionary period, attendance levels remained stable as consumers selected the ~~seasonality of~~theatre as a preferred value for their discretionary income. Patronage trends in 2009 also reflected increasing demand for products unique to the exhibition industry such as 3D. With the motion picture ~~exhibition has become less pronounced as studios have begun~~industry’s transition to ~~release films more evenly throughout~~digital projection technology, the ~~year. This benefits~~products offered by motion picture exhibitors ~~by allowing more effective allocation~~continues to expand, which allows for a broader base of ~~the fixed cost base throughout the year.~~patrons.

Convenient and Affordable Form of Out-Of-Home Entertainment.~~Moviegoing~~Movie going continues to be one of the most convenient and affordable forms of out-of-home entertainment, with an estimated average ticket price in the U.S. of ~~$6.88~~$7.18 in ~~2007.~~2008. (As of the date of this report, MPAA had not yet released the 2009 box office information.) Average prices in ~~2007~~2008 for other forms of out-of-home entertainment in the U.S., including sporting events and theme parks, range from approximately $23.50 to ~~$65.25~~$71.00 per ticket according to MPAA. Movie ticket prices have risen at approximately the rate of inflation, while ticket prices for other forms of out-of-home entertainment have increased at higher rates.

Innovation with Digital Technology.The industry has begun to convert to the use of digital projection technology, which will allow exhibitors to expand their product offerings. Digital technology will allow the presentation of 3-D

content and alternative entertainment venues such as live sports programs, the opera and concert events. These additional programming alternatives may expand the customer base and increase patronage for exhibitors.

Competitive Strengths

We believe the following strengths allow us to compete effectively:

~~Solid~~Disciplined Operating ~~Performance and Discipline.~~Philosophy.We generated operating income and net income attributable to Cinemark Holdings, Inc. of ~~$113.0~~$250.5 million and ~~$88.9~~$97.1 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, ~~2007.~~2009. Our solid operating performance is a result of our ~~financial discipline, such as~~disciplined operating philosophy that centers on building high quality assets, while negotiating favorable theatre level economics and controlling theatre operating costs. ~~We believe~~As a result, we grew our admissions and concession revenues per patron at the ~~continued integration of~~highest CAGR during the ~~Century Acquisition will result in additional revenues and cost efficiencies to further improve our margins.~~last three fiscal years among the three largest U.S. motion picture exhibitors.

Leading Position in Our U.S. Markets.We have a leading market share in the U.S. metropolitan and suburban markets we serve. For the year ended December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, we ranked either first or second based on box office revenues in 2220 out of our top 25 U.S. markets, including the San Francisco Bay Area, Dallas, Houston and Sacramento. On average, the population in domestic markets where over 80% of our theatres are located, including Dallas, Las Vegas and Phoenix, is expected to grow 52% faster than the average growth rate of the U.S. population over the next five years, as reported by BIAfn ~~and U.S. census data.~~Salt Lake City.

Strategically Located in Heavily Populated Latin American Markets.Since 1993, we have invested throughout Latin America ~~due~~in response to the continued growth ~~potential~~ of the region. We currently operate ~~121~~130 theatres and ~~1,011~~1,066 screens in ~~12 countries, generating~~13 countries. Our international screens generated revenues of ~~$333.6~~$421.8 million for the year ended December 31, ~~2007.~~2009. We have successfully established a significant presence in major cities in the region, with theatres in ~~twelve~~thirteen of the fifteen largest metropolitan areas. With ~~the most~~a geographically diverse circuit, ~~in Latin America,~~ we are an important distribution channel to the movie studios. The ~~region’s improved economic climate and rising disposable income are also a source~~projected annual population growth for ~~growth.~~the Latin American countries in which we operate ranges from 1% to 2% for each of the next five years. We are well-positioned with our modern, large-format theatres ~~and new screens~~ to take advantage of ~~this favorable economic environment~~these factors for further growth and diversification of our revenues.

~~Modern~~State-of-the-Art Theatre Circuit.We ~~have one of the most modern theatre circuits in the industry~~offer state-of-the-art theatres, which we believe makes our theatres a preferred destination for moviegoers in our markets. We feature stadium seating in approximately ~~81%~~84% of our first run ~~auditoriums and approximately 82%~~auditoriums. During 2009, we increased the size of our ~~international screens also feature stadium seating. During 2007, we continued our organic expansion~~circuit by ~~opening 257~~adding 180 new screens. We currently have commitments to build ~~225~~137 additional screens over the next three years. We plan to accelerate the installation of digital projection technology in many of our U.S. and international auditoriums, which will allow us to also present 3-D content. We recently developed a large screen digital format, which we call our XD Extreme Digital Cinema, or XD. We currently have an XD screen installed in 16 theatres and have plans to install 30 to 40 more XD screens during 2010. The XD experience includes wall-to-wall and ceiling-to-floor screens, wrap-around sound and a maximum comfort entertainment environment for an intense sensory experience. The XD technology does not require special format movie prints, which allows us the flexibility to play any available digital print we choose, including 3-D content, on the XD screen.

Solid Balance Sheet with Significant Cash Flow from Operating Activities.We generate significant cash flow from operating activities as a result of several factors, including a geographically diverse and modern theatre circuit and management’s ability to ~~contain costs, predictable revenues and a geographically diverse, modern theatre circuit requiring limited maintenance capital expenditures.~~control costs. Additionally, ~~a strategic advantage that enhances our cash flows, is~~ our ownership of land and buildings for 43 of our ~~theatres.~~theatres is a strategic advantage that enhances our cash flows. We believe our expected level of cash flow generation will provide us with the ~~strategic and~~ financial flexibility to pursue growth opportunities, support our debt payments and make dividend payments to our stockholders. As of December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, we had cash and cash equivalents of ~~$338.0~~$437.9 million.

Experienced ~~Management with Focused Operating Philosophy.~~Management.Led by Chairman and founder Lee Roy Mitchell, Chief Executive Officer Alan Stock, President and Chief Operating Officer Timothy Warner and Chief Financial Officer Robert Copple, our management team has an average of approximately 3335 years of theatre operating experience executing a focused strategy ~~which~~that has led to consistent operating results. ~~Our operating philosophy~~This management team has ~~centered on providing a superior viewing experience~~successfully navigated us through many industry and selecting less competitive markets or clustering in strategic metropolitan and suburban markets in order to generate a high return on invested capital. This focused strategy includes strategic site selection, building appropriately-sized theatres for each of our markets, and managing our properties to maximize profitability. As a result, we grew our admissions and concession revenues per patron at the highest CAGR during the last four fiscal years among the three largest motion picture exhibitors in the U.S.economic cycles.

Our Strategy

We believe our disciplined operating philosophy and experienced management team will enable us to continue to enhance our leading position in the motion picture exhibition industry. Key components of our strategy include:

Establish and Maintain Leading Market Positions.We will continue to seek growth opportunities by building or acquiring modern theatres that meet our strategic, financial and demographic criteria. We will continue to focus on establishing and maintaining a leading position in the markets we serve.

Continue to Focus on Operational Excellence.We will continue to focus on achieving operational excellence by controlling theatre operating ~~costs.~~costs while continuing to provide leading customer service. Our margins reflect our track record of operating efficiency.

Selectively Build in Profitable, Strategic Latin American Markets.Our international expansion will ~~continue to focus~~remain focused primarily on Latin America through construction of ~~American-style,~~modern, state-of-the-art theatres in ~~major~~growing urban markets.

~~Dividend Policy~~

~~During August 2007, we initiated a quarterly dividend policy. Consistent with the disclosures~~ We plan to continue to install digital projection technology in many of our international auditoriums, which will allow us to expand our capabilities to present 3-D content in our ~~424(b)(1) prospectus, the dividend~~international markets. We have also installed one of our propriety XD large format screens in one of our international theatres and have plans to install approximately 15 additional XD screens during 2010.

Commitment to Digital Innovation.Our commitment to technological innovation will include an accelerated transition to digital projection technology for a majority of our U.S. theatres and many of our international theatres, which will allow for the ~~second quarter~~presentation of ~~2007 was based upon~~3-D content and alternative entertainment such as concert events, the ~~quarterly dividend rate of $0.18 per common share, prorated based on the April 27, 2007 closing date~~opera, special live documentaries and sports programs. See further discussion of our ~~initial public offering. Based on such proration,~~domestic digital expansion at “Participation in Digital Cinema Implementation Partners LLC”. We also plan to expand our ~~board of directors declared~~XD screen footprint in various markets throughout the U.S. and in select international markets, which offers our patrons a cash dividend of $0.13 per share of common stock, which was paid on September 18, 2007. The dividend for the third quarter was the first dividend paid by us reflecting a full quarter since our initial public offering and was paid in the amount of $0.18 per share of common stock on December 18, 2007. We paid dividends of approximately $33.1 million in the aggregate during 2007. The dividend for the fourth quarter of 2007 was paid in the amount of $0.18 per share of common stock on March 14, 2008. We, at the discretion of our board of directors and subject to applicable law, anticipate paying regular quarterly dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. The amount, if any, ofpremium movie-viewing experience.

the dividends to be paid in the future will depend upon our then available cash, anticipated cash needs, overall financial condition, loan agreement restrictions, future prospects for earnings and cash flows, as well as other relevant factors.

Theatre Operations

As of December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, we operated ~~408~~424 theatres and ~~4,665~~4,896 screens in 3839 states, one Canadian province and 1213 Latin American countries. Our theatres in the U.S. are primarily located in mid-sized U.S. markets, including suburbs of major metropolitan areas. We believe these markets are generally less competitive and generate high, stable margins. Our theatres in Latin America are primarily located in major metropolitan markets, which we believe are generally underscreened. The following tables summarize the geographic locations of our theatre circuit as of December 31, ~~2007.~~2009.

United States Theatres

					��
	Total		Total			Total		Total
State	Theatres		Screens			Theatres		Screens

Texas		78		1,054			79		1,024
California		63		710			62		752
Ohio		20		221			20		223
Utah		12		155			13		169
Nevada		10		154			10		154
Illinois							9		128
Colorado		8		127			8		127
Illinois		9		122
Arizona							7		106
Oregon		7		102			7		102
Arizona		6		94
Kentucky		7		83			7		87
Pennsylvania		5		73			6		89
Oklahoma		6		67			6		67
Florida							5		98
Louisiana		5		58			5		74
Indiana							5		48
New Mexico		4		54			4		54
Virginia		4		52			4		52
Indiana		5		46
North Carolina		4		41			4		41
Mississippi		3		41			3		41
Florida		2		40
Iowa		4		39			3		37
Arkansas		3		30			3		30
Washington		2		30			2		30
Georgia		2		27			2		27
New York		2		27			2		27
South Carolina		2		22			2		22
West Virginia							2		22
Maryland							1		24
Kansas		1		20			1		20
Alaska							1		16
Michigan		1		16			1		16
Alaska		1		16
New Jersey		1		16			1		16
Missouri		1		15			1		15
South Dakota		1		14			1		14
Tennessee		1		14			1		14
Wisconsin		1		14			1		14
Massachusetts		1		12			1		12
Delaware		1		10			1		10
West Virginia		1		10
Minnesota		1		8			1		8
Montana		1		8			1		8

Total United States		286		3,642
United States							293		3,818
Canada		1		12			1		12

Total		287		3,654			294		3,830

In the ~~U.S., we license films from~~domestic marketplace, the Company’s film department negotiates with film distributors, ~~that~~which are ~~owned by~~made up of the traditional major film ~~production~~ companies, ~~or from~~specialized and art divisions of some of these major film companies, and many other independent film ~~distributors that distribute films for smaller production companies. For new release films,~~distributors. The film distributors ~~typically establish geographic~~are responsible for determining release dates, the marketing campaigns and the expenditures related to marketing materials, television spots and other advertising outlets. The marketing of each movie may include tours of the actors in the movies and coordination of articles and features about each movie. The Company is responsible for booking the films in negotiated film zones, ~~and offer each available film~~which are either free zones or competitive zones. In free zones, movies can be booked without regard to ~~one theatre~~the location of another exhibitor within that area. In competitive zones, the distributor allocates their movies to the exhibitors located in ~~each zone. The size of a film zone is~~that area generally ~~determined by the population density,~~based on demographics and ~~box office revenues~~grossing potential of athat particular ~~market or region.~~area. We ~~currently operate theatres in 235 first run film zones in the U.S. New film releases~~ are ~~licensed at the discretion of the film distributors. As~~ the sole exhibitor in approximately ~~85%~~89% of the ~~first run~~246 film zones in which ~~we operate, we have maximum access to~~our first run U.S. theatres operate. In film ~~product, which allows us to~~zones where there is no direct competition from other theatres, we select those ~~pictures~~films that we believe will be the most successful ~~in our markets~~ from among those offered to us by film distributors. ~~We usually~~

~~70% of box office receipts, gradually declining to as low as 30% over a period of four to seven weeks.~~receipts. Under the sliding scale formula, film rental is paid as a percentage of box office revenues using a pre-determined matrix based upon box office performance of the film. The settlement process allows for negotiation of film rental fees upon the conclusion of the film run based upon how the film performs. Internationally, our film rental licenses are primarily based on mutually agreed upon firm terms established prior to the opening of the picture. The film rental percentages paid by our international locations are generally lower than in the U.S. ~~markets and gradually decline over a period of several weeks.~~markets.

We ~~operate seven art theatres with 27 screens under the CinéArts brand. We also~~ regularly play art and independent films at ~~eleven other theatres. CinéArts~~many of our theatres, providing a variety of film choices to our patrons. Bringing art and independent films to our theatres, allows us to ~~take advantage of~~benefit from the growth in the art and independent market driven by the more mature ~~patron. There has been an~~patron and the increased interest in art, foreign and documentary films. High profile film festivals, such as the Sundance Film Festival, have contributed to growth and interest in this genre. Recent hits such as~~Juno, There Will Be Blood~~Crazy Heart, Up in the Air, Young Victoria, The Hurt Lockerand~~No Country For Old Men~~Precioushave demonstrated the box office potential of art and independent films.

Concessions

Concession sales are our second largest revenue source, representing approximately ~~30.7%~~31% of total revenues for each of the ~~year~~years ended December 31, ~~2007.~~2007, 2008 and 2009. Concession sales have a much higher margin than admissions sales. We have devoted considerable management effort to increase concession sales and improve operating margins. These efforts include implementation of the following strategies:

	•		Optimization of product mix.~~Concession~~We offer concession products ~~are~~that primarily ~~comprised of~~include various sizes of popcorn, soft drinks, candy and ~~candy.~~quickly-prepared food, such as hot dogs and nachos. Different varieties and flavors of candy and soft drinks are offered at theatres based on preferences in that particular ~~geographic region.~~market. Our point of sale system allows us to monitor product sales and make changes to product mix when necessary, as we take advantage of national product launches. Specially priced combos and promotions are ~~launched~~introduced on a regular basis to increase average concession purchases as well as to attract new buyers. ~~Kids’ meals are also offered and packaged towards younger patrons.~~

•

Staff training.Employees are continually trained in “suggestive-selling” and “upselling” techniques. Consumer promotions conducted at the concession stand ~~always~~usually include a motivational element ~~which~~that rewards theatre staff for exceptional ~~combo~~ sales ~~during the period.~~of certain promotional items.

A formalized crew program is in place to reward front line employees who excel in delivering rapid service. The Speed of Service (SOS) program is held annually to kick off peak business periods and refresh training and the importance of speed at the front line.

•

Theatre design.Our theatres are designed to optimize efficiencies at the concession stands, which include multiple service stations to facilitate serving more customers ~~quicker.~~more quickly. We strategically place large concession stands within theatres to heighten visibility, reduce the length of concession lines, and improve traffic flow around the concession stands. ~~Century’s~~We have self-service concession areas ~~are designed as individual self-service stations~~in many of our theatres, which allow customers to select their ~~choice of~~own refreshments and proceed to the cash ~~register.~~register when they are ready. This design ~~presents~~allows for efficient service, enhanced ~~choice~~choices and superior visibility of concession items. Concession designs in many of our new theatres have ~~begun to incorporate~~incorporated the ~~benefits experienced with the Century~~self-service model.

•

Cost control.We negotiate prices for concession supplies directly with concession vendors and manufacturers to obtain ~~bulk~~volume rates. Concession supplies are distributed through a national distribution network. The concession distributor supplies and distributes inventory to the theatres, ~~which~~who place ~~volume~~ orders directly with the vendors to replenish stock. ~~The~~We conduct weekly inventory of all concession ~~distributor is paid a percentage fee~~products at each theatre to ensure proper stock levels are maintained for ~~warehousing and delivery of concession goods on a weekly basis.~~business.

	•		advertising through its branded “~~Advertising:~~First Look~~NCM develops, produces, sells and distributes a branded,~~” pre-feature entertainment program, and ~~advertising program called “~~~~FirstLook~~~~,” along with an advertising program for its~~ lobby ~~entertainment network~~promotions and ~~various marketing and promotional products in theatre lobbies;~~

	•		*~~CineMeetings:~~*~~NCM provides live and pre-recorded networked and single-site meetings and events in the theatres throughout its network; and~~

	•		*~~Digital Programming Events:~~*~~NCM distributes live and pre-recorded concerts, sporting events and other non-film entertainment programming to theatres across its digital network.~~displays,

live and pre-recorded networked and single-site meetings and events, and

live and pre-recorded concerts, sporting events and other non-film entertainment programming.

We believe that the reach, scope and digital delivery capability of NCM’s network provides an effective platform for national, regional and local advertisers to reach ~~a young, affluent and~~an engaged ~~audience on a highly targeted and measurable basis.~~

On February 13, 2007, we received $389.0 million in connection with National CineMedia, Inc.’s or NCM Inc.’s, initial public offering and related transactions, or the NCM Transaction. As a result of these transactions, we no longeraudience. We receive ~~a percentage of NCM’s revenue but rather~~ a monthly theatre access ~~fee.~~fee for participation in the NCM network. In addition, we are entitled to receive mandatory quarterly distributions of excess cash from NCM. ~~Prior to the initial public offering~~As of ~~NCM Inc. common stock, our ownership interest in NCM was approximately 25% and subsequent to the completion of the offering~~December 31, 2009, we ~~own~~had an approximate ~~14%~~15% interest in NCM. See Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.

In our international markets, we generally outsource our screen advertising to local companies who have established relationships with local advertisers that provide similar benefits as NCM. The terms of our international screen advertising contracts vary by country. In some locations, we earn a percentage of the screen advertising revenues collected by our partners and in other locations we are paid a fixed annual fee for access to our screens.

Participation in Digital Cinema Implementation Partners

On February 12, 2007, we, AMC and Regal, entered into a joint venture known as Digital Cinema Implementation Partners LLC, ~~(“DCIP”)~~(or DCIP), to facilitate the implementation of digital cinema in our U.S. theatres and to establish agreements with major motion picture studios for the financing of digital cinema. Future digital cinema developments will be managed by DCIP, subject to certain approvals by us, AMC and Regal. Each of Regal, AMC and Cinemark has an equal voting interest in DCIP. To date, DCIP’s wholly-owned subsidiary Kasima has executed long-term deployment agreements with six motion picture studios, under which Kasima will receive a virtual print fee from such studios for each digital presentation. In accordance with these agreements, the digital projection systems deployed by Kasima will comply with the technology and security specifications developed by the Digital Cinema Initiatives studio consortium. In addition, Kasima will lease digital projection systems to us, AMC and Regal under master lease agreements that have an initial term of twelve years.

On March 10, 2010, we signed a master lease agreement and other related agreements (collectively the “agreements”) with Kasima. Upon signing these agreements, we contributed cash and our existing digital projection systems to DCIP. Subsequent to the contributions, we continue to have a 33% voting interest in DCIP and now have a 24.3% economic interest in DCIP. This initial financing is expected to cover the cost of conversion for a large portion of our U.S. circuit’s screens. We ultimately expect to outfit all of our first run screens with digital projection systems, with up to 1,500 screens being digital 3D capable.

As of December 31, 2009, we operated 399 screens enabled with digital 3D projection systems, including 299 in the U.S. As a result of these agreements, we will begin a rollout of 3-D compatible digital projection systems to a majority of our first run U.S. theatres. We will incur certain operating and maintenance costs with respect to the digital projection systems installed in our theatres, which we expect to be relatively comparable to what we currently spend on our conventional film projectors.

Marketing

In the U.S., we rely on ~~newspaper display advertisements, paid for by film distributors,~~ newspaper directory film schedules, generally paid for by us, and Internet advertising, which has emerged as ~~an attractive~~the primary media source to inform patrons of film titles and showtimes. Radio and television advertising spots, generally paid for by film distributors, are used to promote certain motion pictures and special events. We also exhibit previews of coming attractions and films ~~presently playing on the other screens which~~ we ~~operate in the same theatre or market.~~are currently playing. We ~~have successfully used the Internet to provide~~offer patrons access to movie times, the ability to buy and print their tickets at home and purchase gift cards and other advanced sale-type ~~certificates. The Internet is becoming a popular way~~certificates at our Web sitewww.cinemark.com. We partner with film distributors to ~~check movie showtimes and to view movie previews. Many newspapers add an Internet component to their advertising and add movie showtimes to their Internet sites. We~~ use monthly web contests ~~with film distributor partners~~ to drive traffic to our ~~website~~Web site and to ensure that customers visit often. In addition, we work on a regular basis with all of the film distributors to promote their films with local, regional and national programs that are exclusive to our theatres. These programs may involve customer contests, cross-promotions with the media and third parties ~~media on-air tie-ins~~ and other means to increase ~~traffic to~~patronage for a particular film showing at one of our theatres.

Internationally, we exhibit upcoming and current film previews on screen, we partner with film distributors for certain promotions and advertise our new locations through various forms of media and events. We partner with large multi-national corporations in the ~~larger~~large metropolitan areas in which we have theatres, to promote our brand, our image and to increase attendance levels at our theatres. Our customers are encouraged to register on our ~~website~~Web site to receive weekly information ~~via e-mail~~by email for showtime information, invitations to special screenings, sponsored events and promotional information. In addition, our customers can request to receive showtime information ~~via~~on their ~~cellular~~cell phones. We also have loyalty programs in some of our international markets that allow customers to pay a nominal fee for a membership card that provides them with certain admissions and concession discounts. In addition, the Company is currently developing an iPhone application for some of its international markets. This application will allow consumers to check showtimes and purchase tickets.

Our marketing department also focuses on maximizing ancillary revenue, which includes the sale of our gift cards ~~gift certificates~~ and our SuperSaver discount ~~tickets, which are called SuperSavers.~~tickets. We market these programs to such business representatives as realtors, human resource managers, incentive program managers and hospital and pharmaceutical personnel. Gift cards ~~and gift certificates~~ can be purchased at our ~~theatres. Gift cards, gift certificates and~~theatres or online through our Web site. SuperSavers are

also sold online ~~via~~at our Web site or over the phone, fax or email ~~and regular mail and fulfilled in-house from the~~by our local corporate ~~office. Additionally, we sell SuperSavers through third party retailers.~~offices and are also available at certain retailers in the U.S.

Online Sales

Our patrons may purchase advance tickets for all of our domestic screens and ~~339~~approximately one half of our international screens by accessing our corporate ~~website~~Web site at~~www.cinemark.com~~www.cinemark.com.orAdvance tickets may also be purchased for our domestic screens atwww.fandango.com.Our Internet initiatives help improve customer satisfaction, allowing patrons who purchase tickets over the Internet to often bypass lines at the box office by printing their tickets at home or picking up their tickets at kiosks inlocated at the ~~theatre lobby.~~theatre.

Point of Sale Systems

We have developed our own proprietary point of sale system to ~~further~~ enhance our ability to maximize revenues, control costs and efficiently manage operations. The system is currently installed in all of our U.S. theatres and our one Canadian theatre. The point of sale system provides corporate management with real-time admissions and concession revenues data and reports ~~that~~to allow ~~managers to make~~for timely changes to movie schedules, including extending film runs, increasing the number of screens on which successful movies are being played, or substituting films when gross receipts do not meet expectations. Real-time seating and box office information is available to box office personnel, preventing overselling of a particular film and providing faster and more accurate responses to customer inquiries regarding showtimes and available seating. The system tracks concession sales by product, provides in-theatre inventory reports ~~allowing~~ for efficient inventory management and control, ~~has multiple language capabilities,~~ offers numerous ticket pricing options, connects with digital concession signage for real-time pricing modifications, integrates Internet ticket sales and processes credit card transactions. Barcode scanners, pole displays, touch screens, credit card readers and other equipment are integrated with the system to enhance its ~~functions.~~functions and provide print at home and mobile ticketing. In our international locations, we currently use other point of sale systems that have either been developed internally or by third parties, which have been certified as compliant with applicable governmental ~~regulations.~~regulations and provide generally the same capabilities as our proprietary point of sale system.

Competition

We are ~~one of~~ the ~~leading~~second largest motion picture ~~exhibitors~~exhibitor in the world in terms of both ~~revenues~~attendance and the number of screens in operation. We compete against local, regional, national and international exhibitors with respect to attracting patrons, licensing films and developing new theatre sites.

We are the sole exhibitor in approximately ~~85%~~89% of the ~~235 first run~~246 film zones in which our first run U.S. theatres operate. In film zones where there is no direct competition from other theatres, we select those films that we believe will be the most successful from among those offered to us by film distributors. Where there is competition, ~~we usually license films~~the distributor allocates their movies to the exhibitors located in that area generally based on ~~an allocation process.~~demographics and grossing potential of that particular area. Of the ~~1,011~~1,066 screens we operate outside of the U.S., approximately 72% of those screens have no direct competition from other theatres. ~~The principal competitive factors with respect to~~In areas where we face direct competition, our success in attracting patrons depends on location, accessibility and capacity of an exhibitor’s theatre, quality of projection and sound equipment, film ~~licensing are:~~

	•		~~location, accessibility and capacity of an exhibitor’s theatre;~~

	•		~~theatre comfort;~~

	•		~~quality of projection and sound equipment;~~

	•		~~level of customer service; and~~

	•		~~licensing terms.~~

showtime availability, levels of customer service, and ticket prices. The competition for ~~customers~~film licensing in the U.S. is dependent upon factors such as the ~~availability~~theatre’s location and its demographics, the condition, capacity and revenue potential of ~~popular films, the location of theatres, the comfort~~each theatre, and ~~quality of theatres~~licensing terms.

We compete for new theatre sites with other movie theatre exhibitors as well as other entertainment venues, with securing a potential site being dependent upon factors such as committed investment and ~~ticket prices. Our ticket prices are competitive with ticket prices of competing theatres.~~resources, theatre design and capacity, revenue and patron potential, and financial stability.

We also face competition from a number of other motion picture exhibition delivery systems, such as DVDs, network and syndicated television, video on-demand, pay-per-view television and ~~downloading utilizing~~ the Internet. We do not believe that these additional distribution channels have adversely affected theatre attendance; however, we can give no assurance that these or other alternative delivery systems will not have an adverse impact on attendance in the future. We

also face competition from other forms of entertainment competing for the public’s leisure time and disposable income, such as concerts, theme parks and sporting events.

Corporate Operations

~~We maintain a~~Our corporate ~~office~~headquarters is located in Plano, ~~Texas that provides~~Texas. Personnel at our corporate headquarters provide oversight for our domestic and international theatres. Domestic ~~operations~~personnel at our corporate headquarters include our executive team and department heads in charge of film licensing, concessions, theatre operations support, ~~film licensing and settlements,~~ human resources, legal, finance and accounting, ~~operational~~ audit, theatre maintenance and construction, ~~Internet and~~ information systems support, real estate and marketing. Our U.S. operations are divided into sixteen regions, primarily organized geographically, each of which is headed by a region leader.

International personnel ~~in the~~at our corporate ~~office~~headquarters include our President of Cinemark International, L.L.C. and ~~vice presidents/directors~~department heads in charge of film licensing, concessions, theatre operations, ~~support,~~ theatre ~~maintenance and~~ construction, real estate, legal, ~~operational~~ audit, information systems and accounting. We have a chief financial officer in both Brazil and Mexico, which are our two largest international markets. We have eight regional offices in Latin America responsible for the local management of ~~operations~~theatres in ~~twelve~~thirteen individual countries. Each regional office is headed by a general manager and includes personnel in film licensing, marketing, human resources, information systems, operations and accounting. The regional offices are staffed with ~~nationals~~experienced personnel from the region to ~~overcome~~mitigate cultural and operational barriers.

Employees

We have approximately ~~12,300~~14,200 employees in the U.S., approximately 10% of whom are full time employees and 90% of whom are part time employees. We have approximately ~~4,400~~6,500 employees in our international markets, approximately ~~39%~~63% of whom are full time employees and approximately ~~61%~~37% of whom are part time employees. ~~Seventeen~~Some of our U.S. employees are represented by unions under collective bargaining ~~agreements. Some~~agreements, and some of our international locations are subject to union regulations. We regard our relations with our employees to be satisfactory.

Regulations

The distribution of motion pictures is largely regulated by federal and state antitrust laws and has been the subject of numerous antitrust cases. ~~We have not been a party to such cases, but the~~The manner in which we can license films from certain major film distributors is subject to consent decrees resulting from these cases. Consent decrees bind certain major film distributors and require the films of such distributors to be offered and licensed to exhibitors, including us, on a theatre-by-theatre and film-by-film basis.

~~Item 1A. Risk Factors~~


Item 1A.		Risk Factors

Our business depends on film production and performance.

Our business depends on both the availability of suitable films for exhibition in our theatres and the success of those ~~pictures~~films in our markets. Poor performance of films, the disruption in the production of films due to events such as a strike by directors, writers or actors, a reduction in financing options for the film distributors, or a reduction in the marketing efforts of the film distributors to promote their films could have an adverse effect on our business by resulting in fewer patrons and reduced revenues.

A deterioration in relationships with film distributors could adversely affect our ability to obtain commercially successful films.

We rely on the film distributors ~~for~~to supply the ~~motion pictures~~films shown in our theatres. The film distribution business is highly concentrated, with six major film distributors accounting for approximately ~~78%~~83% of U.S. box office revenues and 4244 of the top 50 grossing films during ~~2007.~~2009. Numerous antitrust cases and consent decrees resulting from these antitrust cases impact the distribution of ~~motion pictures.~~films. The consent decrees bind certain major film distributors to license films to exhibitors on a theatre-by-theatre and film-by-film basis. Consequently, we cannot guarantee a supply of films by entering into long-term arrangements with major distributors. We are therefore required to negotiate licenses for each film and for each theatre. A deterioration in our relationship with any of the six major film distributors could adversely affect our ability to obtain commercially successful films and to negotiate favorable licensing terms for such films, both of which could adversely affect our business and operating results.

Our results of operations vary from period to period based upon the quantity and quality of the motion pictures that we show in our theatres.

Our results of operations vary from period to period based upon the quantity and quality of the motion pictures that we show in our theatres. The major film distributors generally release the films they anticipate will be most successful during the summer and holiday seasons. Consequently, we typically generate higher revenues during these periods. Due to the dependency on the success of films released from one period to the next, results of operations for one period may not be indicative of the results for the following period or the same period in the following year.

We face intense competition for patrons and ~~film licensing~~films which may adversely affect our business.

The motion picture industry is highly competitive. We compete against local, regional, national and international exhibitors. We compete for both patrons and licensing of ~~motion pictures.~~films. The competition for patrons is dependent upon such factors as ~~the availability~~location, accessibility and capacity of ~~popular motion pictures, the location and number of theatres and screens in a market,~~an exhibitor’s theatre, the comfort and quality of the theatres, film and showtime availability, levels of customer service, and pricing. ~~Some of our competitors have greater resources and may have lower costs.~~ The principal competitive factors with respect to film licensing include ~~licensing terms, number of seats~~the theatre’s location and ~~screens available for a particular picture,~~its demographics, the condition, capacity and revenue potential of each theatre and ~~the location and condition of an exhibitor’s theatres.~~licensing terms. If we are unable to attract patrons or to license successful films, our business may be adversely affected.

~~The oversupply of screens in the motion picture exhibition industry and other factors may adversely affect the performance of some of our theatres.~~

During the period between 1996 and 2000, theatre exhibitor companies emphasized the development of large multiplexes. The strategy of aggressively building multiplexes was adopted throughout the industry and resulted in an oversupply of screens in the North American exhibition industry and negatively impacted many older multiplex theatres more than expected. Many of these theatres have long lease commitments making them financially burdensome to close prior to the expiration of the lease term, even theatres that are unprofitable. Where theatres have been closed, landlords have often made rent concessions to small independent or regional operators to keep the theatres open since theatre buildings are typically limited in alternative uses. As a result, some analysts believe that there continues to be an oversupply of screens in the North American exhibition industry, as screen counts have increased each year since 2003. If competitors build theatres in the markets we serve, the performance of some of our theatres could be adversely affected due to increased competition.

An increase in the use of alternative or “downstream” film distribution channels and other competing forms of entertainment may ~~drive down~~reduce movie theatre attendance and limit ticket price growth.

We face competition for patrons from a number of alternative ~~motion picture~~film distribution channels, such as DVDs, network and syndicated television, video on-demand, pay-per-view television and ~~downloading utilizing~~ the Internet. We also compete with other forms of entertainment, ~~competing~~such as concerts, amusement parks and sporting events, for our patrons’ leisure time and disposable ~~income such as concerts, amusement parks and sporting events.~~income. A significant increase in popularity of these alternative film distribution channels and competing forms of entertainment could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

1214

Our results of operations may be impacted by shrinking video release windows.

Over the last decade, the average video release window, which represents the time that elapses from the date of a film’s theatrical release to the date a film is available on DVD, an important downstream market, has decreased from approximately six months to approximately three to four months. If patrons choose to wait for a DVD release rather than attend a theatre for viewing the film, it may adversely impact our business and results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. We cannot assure you that this release window, which is determined by the film studios, will not shrink further or be eliminated altogether, which could have an adverse impact on our business and results of operations.

We have substantial long-term lease and debt obligations, which may restrict our ability to fund current and future ~~operations.~~operations and that restrict our ability to enter into certain transactions.

We have, and will continue to have, significant long-term debt service obligations and long-term lease obligations. As of December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, we had ~~$1,574.4~~$1,543.7 million in long-term debt obligations, ~~$121.2~~$140.4 million in capital lease obligations and ~~$1,958.4~~$1,865.6 million in long-term operating lease obligations. We incurred ~~$145.6 million of~~ interest expense of $102.5 million for the year ended December 31, ~~2007.~~2009. We incurred ~~$212.7~~$238.8 million of ~~rent~~facility lease expense under operating leases for the year ended December 31, ~~2007~~2009 (the terms under these operating leases, ~~(with terms,~~ excluding renewal options, ~~ranging~~range from one to 3028 years). Our substantial lease and debt obligations pose risk to you by:

	•		~~making it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations;~~

	•		requiring us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow to payments on our lease and debt obligations, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other corporate requirements and to pay dividends;

	•		~~impeding our ability to obtain additional financing in the future for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and general corporate purposes;~~

	•		~~subjecting us to the risk of increased sensitivity to interest rate increases on our variable rate debt, including our borrowings under our senior secured credit facility; and~~

	•		~~making us more vulnerable to a downturn in our business and competitive pressures and limiting our flexibility to plan for, or react to, changes in our business.~~

making it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations;

requiring us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flows to payments on our lease and debt obligations, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flows from operations to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other corporate requirements and to pay dividends;

impeding our ability to obtain additional financing in the future for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and general corporate purposes;

subjecting us to the risk of increased sensitivity to interest rate increases on our variable rate debt, including our borrowings under our senior secured credit facility; and

making us more vulnerable to a downturn in our business and competitive pressures and limiting our flexibility to plan for, or react to, changes in our industry or the economy.

Our ability to make scheduled payments of principal and interest with respect to our indebtedness ~~and service our lease obligations~~ will depend on our ability to generate positive cash ~~flow from~~flows and on our ~~operations. To a certain extent, our~~future financial results. Our ability to generate positive cash ~~flow~~flows is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control. We cannot assure you that we will continue to generate cash ~~flow~~flows at current ~~levels.~~levels, or that future borrowings will be available under our senior secured credit facility, in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness. If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our lease and debt service obligations, we may be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell assets or operations, seek additional capital or restructure or refinance our indebtedness. We may not be able to take any of these actions, and these actions may not be successful or permit us to meet our scheduled debt service obligations and these actions may be restricted under the terms of our existing or future debt agreements, including our senior secured credit facility. The senior secured credit facility restricts our ability to dispose of assets and use the proceeds from the disposition. We may not be able to consummate those dispositions or the proceeds may not be adequate to meet our debt service obligations.

If we fail to make any required payment under the agreements governing our leases and indebtedness or fail to comply with the financial and operating covenants contained in them, we would be in default, and our lenders would have the ability to require that we immediately repay our outstanding indebtedness. If we fail to make any required payment under our leases, we would be in default and our landlords would have the ability to terminate our leases and re-enter the premises. Subject to the restrictions contained in our indebtedness agreements, we expect to incur additional indebtedness from time to time to finance acquisitions, capital expenditures, working capital requirements and other general business purposes. In addition, we may need to refinance all oras a ~~portion of our indebtedness, including Cinemark USA, Inc.’s senior secured credit facility and Cinemark, Inc.’s 9~~³/4~~% senior discount notes, on or before maturity. However, we may not be able to refinance all or any of our indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms or at all.~~

~~We are subject to various covenants in our debt agreements that restrict our ability to enter into certain transactions.~~

The agreements governing our debt obligations contain various financial and operating covenants that limit our ability to engage in certain transactions, that require us not to allow specific events to occur or that require us to apply proceeds from certain transactions to reduce indebtedness. If we fail to make any required payment under the agreements governing our indebtedness or fail to comply with the financial and operating covenants contained in them, we would be in default, andresult, our debt holders would have the ability to require that we immediately repay our outstanding ~~indebtedness. Any such defaults~~indebtedness and the lenders under our senior secured credit facility could ~~materially impair~~terminate their commitments to lend us money and foreclose against the assets securing their borrowings. We could be forced into bankruptcy or liquidation, which could result in the loss of your investment. The acceleration of our ~~financial condition~~indebtedness under one agreement may permit acceleration of indebtedness under other agreements that contain cross-default and ~~liquidity. We cannot assure you that~~cross-acceleration provisions. If our indebtedness is accelerated, we ~~would~~may not be able to repay our indebtedness or borrow sufficient funds to refinance it. Even if we are able to obtain new financing, it may not be on commercially reasonable terms or on terms that are acceptable to us. If our ~~outstanding indebtedness if~~ debt holders require ~~repayments as a result of a default.~~immediate payment, we may not have sufficient assets to satisfy our obligations under our indebtedness.

1315

General political, social and economic conditions can adversely affect our attendance.

Our results of operations are dependent on general political, social and economic conditions, and the impact of such conditions on our theatre operating costs and on the willingness of consumers to spend money at movie theatres. If consumers’ discretionary income declines as a result of an economic downturn, our operations could be adversely affected. If theatre operating costs, such as utility costs, increase due to political or economic changes, our results of operations could be adversely affected. Political events, such as terrorist attacks, and health-related epidemics, such as flu outbreaks, could cause people to avoid our theatres or other public places where large crowds are in attendance. In addition, a natural disaster, such as a hurricane or an earthquake, could impact our ability to operate certain of our theatres, which could adversely affect our attendance.

Our foreign operations are subject to adverse regulations, economic instability and currency exchange risk.

We have ~~121~~130 theatres with ~~1,011~~1,066 screens in ~~twelve~~thirteen countries in Latin America. Brazil and Mexico represented approximately ~~9.3%~~11% and ~~4.5%~~3% of our consolidated ~~2007~~2009 revenues, respectively. Governmental regulation of the motion picture industry in foreign markets differs from that in the United States. ~~Regulations~~Changes in regulations affecting prices, quota systems requiring the exhibition of locally-produced films and restrictions on ownership of ~~land~~property may adversely affect our international operations in foreign markets. Our international operations are subject to certain political, economic and other uncertainties not encountered by our domestic operations, including risks of severe economic downturns and high inflation. We also face ~~the additional~~ risks of currency fluctuations, hard currency shortages and controls of foreign currency exchange and transfers abroad, all of which could have an adverse effect on the results of our international operations.

We may not be able to generate additional revenues or continue to realize value from our investment in NCM.

WeIn 2005, we joined Regal and AMC as founding members of NCM, ~~in 2005. After the completion~~a provider of ~~NCM Inc.’s initial public offering,~~digital advertising content and digital non-film event content. As of December 31, 2009, we ~~continue to own a 14%~~had an interest in ~~NCM. In connection with the~~ NCM ~~Inc. initial public offering, we modified~~of approximately 15%. We receive a monthly theatre access fee under our Exhibitor Services Agreement with NCM and we are entitled to ~~reflect a shift~~receive mandatory quarterly distributions of excess cash from ~~circuit share expense under~~NCM. During the ~~prior exhibitor service agreement, which obligated~~years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009, the Company received approximately $1.8 million and $5.7 million in other revenues from NCM, ~~to pay us a percentage~~respectively, and $18.8 million and $20.8 million in cash distributions in excess of ~~revenue, to a monthly theatre access fee. The theatre access fee has significantly reduced the contractual amounts paid to us by NCM.~~

our investment in NCM, respectively. Cinema advertising is a small component of the U.S. advertising ~~market. Accordingly,~~market and therefore, NCM competes with larger, established and well known media platforms such as broadcast radio and television, cable and satellite television, outdoor advertising and Internet portals. NCM also competes with other cinema advertising companies and with hotels, conference centers, arenas, restaurants and convention facilities for its non-film related events to be shown or held in our auditoriums. In-theatre advertising may not continue to attract advertisers or NCM’s in-theatre advertising format may not continue to be received favorably by ~~the theatre-going public.~~theatre patrons. If NCM is unable to continue to generate ~~expected sales of~~consistent advertising ~~it may not maintain the level of profitability we hope to achieve,~~revenues, its results of operations may be adversely affected and our investment in and distributions and revenues from NCM may be adversely impacted.

We are subject to uncertainties related to digital cinema, including ~~potentially high costs~~insufficient financing to obtain digital projectors and insufficient supply of ~~re-equipping theatres with projectors to show~~ digital ~~movies.~~projectors.

Digital cinema is still in an ~~experimental~~early conversion stage in our industry. ~~Some~~We, along with some of our competitors, have commenced a roll-out of digital equipment for exhibiting feature ~~films. There are multiple parties vying for~~films and plan to continue the ~~position of being the primary generator of the digital projector~~ roll-out ~~for exhibiting feature films.~~through our joint venture DCIP. However, significant obstacles exist that impact such a roll-out plan including the cost of digital projectors, and the ~~substantial investment in re-equipping theatres and determining who will be responsible for such costs.~~supply of projectors by manufacturers. We cannot assure you that weDCIP will be able to obtain sufficient financing ~~arrangements~~ to ~~fund~~be able to purchase and lease to us the number of digital projectors needed for our ~~portion of~~roll-out or that the ~~digital cinema roll-out nor that such financing~~manufacturers will be ~~available~~able to ~~us on acceptable terms, if~~supply the volume of projectors needed for our roll-out. As a result, our roll-out of digital equipment could be delayed or not completed at all.

We are subject to uncertainties relating to future expansion plans, including our ability to identify suitable acquisition candidates or site ~~locations.~~locations, and to obtain financing for such activities on favorable terms or at all.

We have greatly expanded our operations over the last decade through targeted worldwide theatre development and ~~the Century Acquisition.~~acquisitions. We will continue to pursue a strategy of expansion that will involve the development of new theatres and may involve acquisitions of existing theatres and theatre circuits both in the U.S. and internationally. There is significant competition for new site locations and for existing theatre and theatre circuit acquisition opportunities. As a result of such competition, we may not be able to acquire attractive site locations, existing theatres or theatre circuits on terms we consider acceptable. Acquisitions and expansion opportunities may divert a significant amount of management’s time away from the operation of our business. Growth by acquisition also involves risks relating to difficulties in integrating

business, financial condition, profitability, or ~~profitability.~~cash flows. Further, our expansion programs may require financing above our existing borrowing capacity and ~~internally generated funds.~~operating cash flows. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain such financing ~~nor~~or that such financing will be available to us on acceptable ~~terms.~~terms or at all.

If we do not comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and a consent order we entered into with the Department of Justice, or the DOJ, we could be subject to further litigation.

Our theatres must comply with Title III of the ADA and analogous state and local laws. Compliance with the ADA requires among other things that public facilities “reasonably accommodate” individuals with disabilities and that new construction or alterations made to “commercial facilities” conform to accessibility guidelines unless “structurally impracticable” for new construction or technically infeasible for alterations. In March 1999, the Department of Justice, or DOJ, filed suit against us in Ohio alleging certain violations of the ADA relating to wheelchair seating arrangements in certain of our stadium-style theatres and seeking remedial action. We and the DOJ have resolved this lawsuit and a consent order was entered by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, on November 15, 2004. Under the consent order, we ~~are~~were required to make modifications to wheelchair seating locations in fourteen stadium-style movie theatres and spacing and companion seating modifications in 67 auditoriums at other stadium-styled movie theatres. These modifications ~~must be~~were completed by November 2009. ~~We are currently in compliance with the consent order.~~ Upon completion of these modifications, these theatres ~~will~~ comply with wheelchair seating requirements, and no further modifications will be required to our other stadium-style movie theatres in the United States existing on the date of the consent order. In addition, under the consent order, the DOJ approved the seating plans for nine stadium-styled movie theatres then under construction and also created a safe harbor framework for us to construct all of our future stadium-style movie theatres. The DOJ has stipulated that all theatres built in compliance with the consent order will comply with the wheelchair seating requirements of the ADA. If we fail to comply with the ADA, remedies could include imposition of injunctive relief, fines, awards for damages to private litigants and additional capital expenditures to remedy non-compliance. Imposition of significant fines, damage awards or capital expenditures to cure non-compliance could adversely affect our business and operating results.

We depend on key personnel for our current and future performance.

Our current and future performance depends to a significant degree upon the continued contributions of our senior management team and other key personnel. The loss or unavailability to us of any member of our senior management team or a key employee could significantly harm us. We cannot assure you that we would be able to locate or employ qualified replacements for senior management or key employees on acceptable terms.

We are subject to impairment losses due to potential declines in the fair value of our assets.

We review long-lived assets for impairment indicators on a quarterly basis or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable.

We assess many factors when determining whether to impair individual theatre assets, including actual theatre level cash flows, future years budgeted theatre level cash flows, theatre property and equipment carrying values, ~~theatre goodwill~~amortizing intangible assets carrying values, the age of a recently built theatre, competitive theatres in the marketplace, changes in foreign currency exchange rates, the impact of recent ticket price changes, available lease renewal options and other factors considered relevant in our assessment of impairment of individual theatre assets. ~~The~~Long-lived assets are evaluated for impairment ~~evaluation~~on an individual theatre basis, which we believe is ~~based on~~ the lowest applicable level for which there are identifiable cash flows. When estimated cash flows from continuing use through the remainder of the theatre’s useful life. The remainder of the useful life correlates with the available remaining lease period, which includes the probability of renewal periods, for leased properties and a period of twenty years for fee owned properties. If the estimated cash flows are not sufficientfair value is determined to ~~recover a long-lived asset’s carrying value, we then compare~~be lower than the carrying value of the ~~asset group (theatre) with its~~theatre assets, the theatre assets are written down to their estimated fair value. Fair value is determined based on a multiple of cash flows, which was ~~seven times for 2005 and~~ eight times for the evaluations performed during ~~2006~~2007 and ~~2007. When estimated fair value is determined to be lower than~~ the ~~carrying value~~first, second and third quarters of 2008 and six and a half times for the ~~asset group (theatre),~~evaluation performed during the ~~asset group (theatre) is written down to its estimated fair value.~~fourth quarter of 2008 and the evaluations performed during 2009. Significant judgment is involved in estimating cash flows and fair value. Management’s estimates, which fall under Level 3, are based on historical and projected operating performance, ~~as well as~~ recent market ~~transactions.~~

~~We also test goodwill~~transactions and ~~other intangible~~current industry trading multiples. Since we evaluate long-lived assets for impairment at ~~least annually~~the theatre level, if a theatre is directly and individually impacted by increased competition, adverse changes in ~~accordance with SFAS No. 142, “~~~~Goodwill~~market demographics or adverse changes in the development or condition of the areas surrounding the theatre, we may record impairment charges to reflect the decline in estimated fair value of that theatre.

We have a significant amount of goodwill as a result of the Century Acquisition and ~~Other Intangible Assets.~~~~” Goodwill and other intangible assets are tested~~the Cinemark Share Exchange. We evaluate goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level at least annually during the fourth quarter or whenever

~~significant negative industry or economic trends.~~of goodwill might exceed its estimated fair value. Goodwill impairment is evaluated using a two-step approach requiring us to compute the fair value of a reporting unit ~~(generally at the theatre level),~~ and compare it with its carrying value. If the carrying value of the theatre exceeds its fair value, a second step would be performed to measure the potential goodwill impairment. Fair ~~value is estimated~~values are determined based on a multiple of cash flows, which was ~~seven times for 2005 and~~ eight times for the evaluations performed during ~~2006~~2007 and ~~2007.~~six and a half times for the evaluations performed during 2008 and 2009. Significant judgment is involved in estimating cash flows and fair value. Management’s estimates, which fall under Level 3, are based on historical and projected operating performance, ~~as well as~~ recent market ~~transactions. We allocate goodwill at~~transactions and current industry trading multiples. Declines in our stock price or market capitalization, declines in the ~~theatre level. This results in more volatile impairment charges on an annual basis~~Company’s attendance due to increased competition in certain regions and/or countries or economic factors that lead to a decline in attendance in any given region or country could negatively affect the Company’s estimated fair values and could result in further impairments of goodwill. As of December 31, 2009, the carrying value of goodwill allocated to reporting units where the estimated fair value was less than 10% more than the carrying value was approximately $173.0 million.

We also have a significant amount of tradename intangible assets as a result of the Century Acquisition and the Cinemark Share Exchange. Tradename intangible assets are tested for impairment at least annually during the fourth quarter or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. We estimate the fair value of our tradenames by applying an estimated market ~~conditions and box office performance and~~royalty rate that could be charged for the ~~resulting impact on individual theatres.~~use of our tradename to forecasted future revenues, with an adjustment for the present value of such royalties. If the estimated fair value is less than the carrying value, the tradename intangible asset is written down to the estimated fair value.

We recorded asset impairment charges, including goodwill impairment charges, of ~~$51.7~~$86.6 million, ~~$28.5 million~~$113.5 and ~~$86.6~~$11.8 million for the years ended December 31, ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 and ~~2007,~~2009, respectively. We cannot assure you that additional impairment charges will not be required in the future, and such charges may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Notes 1011 and 1112 to the consolidated financial statements.

~~Our~~The impairment or insolvency of other financial institutions could adversely affect us.

We have exposure to different counterparties with regard to our interest rate swap agreements. These transactions expose us to credit risk in the event of a default by one or more of our counterparties to such agreements. We also have exposure to financial institutions used as depositories of our corporate cash balances. If our counterparties or financial institutions become impaired or insolvent, this could have a material impact on our results of operations ~~vary from period~~or impair our ability to ~~period based upon~~access our cash.

A credit market crisis may adversely affect our ability to raise capital and may materially impact our operations.

Severe dislocations and liquidity disruptions in the ~~quantity~~credit markets could materially impact our ability to obtain debt financing on reasonable terms or at all. The inability to access debt financing on reasonable terms could materially impact our ability to make acquisitions or significantly expand our business in the future.

We may be subject to liability under environmental laws and ~~quality~~regulations.

We own and operate a large number of theatres and other properties within the United States and internationally, which may be subject to various foreign, federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the ~~motion pictures~~environment or human health. Such environmental laws and regulations include those that impose liability for the investigation and remediation of spills or releases of hazardous materials. We may incur such liability, including for any currently or formerly owned, leased or operated property, or for any site, to which we ~~show~~may have disposed, or arranged for the disposal of, hazardous materials or wastes. Certain of these laws and regulations may impose liability, including on a joint and several liability, which can result in a liable party being obliged to pay for greater than its share, regardless of fault or the legality of the original disposal. Environmental conditions relating to our ~~theatres.~~properties or operations could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations and cash flows.

The interests of Madison Dearborn Capital Partners IV, L.P., or MDCP, may not be aligned with yours.

MDCP beneficially owns approximately 39% of our common stock and under a director nomination agreement, is entitled to designate nominees for five members of our board of directors. Accordingly, MDCP has influence and effectively controls our corporate and management policies and has significant influence over the outcome of any corporate transaction or other matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, including potential mergers or

acquisitions, asset sales and other significant corporate transactions. MDCP could seek to take other actions that might be desirable to MDCP but that might not be desirable for other stockholders.

Our ability to pay dividends may be limited or otherwise restricted.

Our ability to pay dividends is limited by our status as a holding company and the terms of our indenture, our senior secured credit facility and certain of our other debt instruments, which restrict our ability to pay dividends and the ability of certain of our subsidiaries to pay dividends, directly or indirectly, to us. Under our debt instruments, we may pay a cash dividend up to a specified amount, provided we have satisfied certain financial covenants in, and are not in default under, our debt instruments. Furthermore, certain of our foreign subsidiaries currently have a deficit in retained earnings which prevents them from declaring and paying dividends from those subsidiaries. The declaration of future dividends on our common stock will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon many factors, including our results of operations, ~~vary from period to period based upon the quantity~~financial condition, earnings, capital requirements, limitations in our debt agreements and ~~quality~~legal requirements.

Provisions in our corporate documents and certain agreements, as well as Delaware law, may hinder a change of control.

Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as well as provisions of the ~~motion pictures~~Delaware General Corporation Law, could discourage unsolicited proposals to acquire us, even though such proposals may be beneficial to you. These provisions include:

authorization of our board of directors to issue shares of preferred stock without stockholder approval;

a board of directors classified into three classes of directors with the directors of each class, subject to shorter initial terms for some directors, having staggered, three-year terms;

provisions regulating the ability of our stockholders to nominate directors for election or to bring matters for action at annual meetings of our stockholders; and

provisions of Delaware law that ~~we show in~~restrict many business combinations and provide that directors serving on classified boards of directors, such as ours, may be removed only for cause.

Certain provisions of our ~~theatres. The major film distributors generally release~~8.625% senior notes indenture and our senior secured credit facility may have the ~~films they anticipate will be most successful during the summer and holiday seasons. Consequently, we typically generate higher revenues during these periods. Due~~effect of delaying or preventing future transactions involving a “change of control.” A “change of control” would require us to make an offer to the ~~dependency on~~holders of our 8.625% senior notes to repurchase all of the ~~success~~outstanding notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of ~~films released from one period~~the aggregate principal amount outstanding plus accrued unpaid interest to the ~~next,~~date of the purchase. A “change of control” would also be an event of default under our senior secured credit facility.

The market price of our common stock may be volatile.

There can be no assurance that an active trading market for our common stock will continue. The securities markets have recently experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations and the market prices of the securities of companies have been particularly volatile. This market volatility, as well as general economic or political conditions, could reduce the market price of our common stock regardless of our operating performance. In addition, our operating results could be below the expectations of ~~operations~~investment analysts and investors and, in response, the market price of our common stock may decrease significantly and prevent investors from reselling their shares of our common stock at or above a market price that is favorable to other stockholders. In the past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their stock have been the subject of securities class action litigation. If we were the subject of securities class action litigation, it could result in substantial costs, liabilities and a diversion of management’s attention and resources.

Future sales of our common stock may adversely affect the prevailing market price.

If a large number of shares of our common stock is sold in the open market, or if there is a perception that such sales will occur, the trading price of our common stock could decrease. In addition, the sale of these shares could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional common stock. As of December 31, 2009, we had an aggregate of 173,160,476 shares of our common stock authorized but unissued and not reserved for ~~one period~~specific purposes. In general, we may issue all of these shares without any action or approval by our stockholders. We may issue shares of our common stock in connection with acquisitions.

As of December 31, 2009, we had 110,917,105 shares of our common stock outstanding. Of these shares, approximately 37,392,814 shares were freely tradable. The remaining shares of our common stock were “restricted securities” as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. Restricted securities may not be ~~indicative~~resold in a public distribution except in compliance with the registration requirements of the ~~results~~Securities Act or pursuant to an exemption therefrom, including the exemptions provided by Regulation S and Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act.

We cannot predict whether substantial amounts of our common stock will be sold in the open market in anticipation of, or following, any divestiture by any of our existing stockholders, our directors or executive officers of their shares of common stock.

As of December 31, 2009, there were 10,897,498 shares of our common stock reserved for issuance under our Amended and Restated 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan, of which 1,231,892 shares of common stock were issuable upon exercise of options outstanding as of December 31, 2009. The sale of shares issued upon the exercise of stock options could further dilute your investment in our common stock and adversely affect our stock price.

Legislative or regulatory initiatives related to global warming/climate change concerns may negatively impact our business.

Recently, there has been an increasing focus and continuous debate on global climate change including increased attention from regulatory agencies and legislative bodies. This increased focus may lead to new initiatives directed at regulating an as yet unspecified array of environmental matters. Legislative, regulatory or other efforts in the United States to combat climate change could result in future increases in the cost of raw materials, taxes, transportation and utilities for our vendors and for us which would result in higher operating costs for the ~~following period~~Company. Also, compliance of our theatres and accompanying real estate with new and revised environmental, zoning, land-use or building codes, laws, rules or regulations, could have a material and adverse effect on our business. However, we are unable to predict at this time, the ~~same period in the following year.~~potential effects, if any, that any future environmental initiatives may have on our business.

~~Item 2. Properties~~


Item 1B.		Unresolved Staff Comments

None.


Item 2.		Properties

United States

As of December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, we operated ~~244~~251 theatres, with ~~3,047~~3,223 screens, pursuant to leases and own the land and building for 43 theatres, with 607 screens, in the U.S. ~~During 2007, we opened 13 new theatres with 201 screens.~~ Our leases are generally entered into on a long-term basis with terms, including renewal options, generally ranging from 20 to 45 years. As of December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, approximately ~~10%~~7% of our theatre leases in the U.S., covering 2519 theatres with ~~205~~162 screens, have remaining terms, including optional renewal periods, of less than ~~five~~six years. Approximately ~~13%~~12% of our theatre leases in the U.S., covering 3129 theatres with ~~275~~221 screens, have remaining terms, including optional renewal periods, of between six and 15 years and approximately ~~77%~~81% of our theatre leases in the U.S., covering ~~188~~203 theatres with ~~2,567~~2,840 screens, have remaining terms, including optional renewal periods, of more than 15 years. The leases generally provide for a fixed monthly minimum rent payment, with certain leases also subject to additional percentage rent if a target annual revenue level is achieved. We lease an office building in Plano, Texas for our corporate ~~office.~~headquarters.

International

As of December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, internationally, we operated ~~121~~130 theatres, with ~~1,011~~1,066 screens, all of which are leased pursuant to ground or building leases. ~~In 2007, we opened seven new theatres with 56 screens in Latin America.~~ Our international leases are generally entered into on a long term basis with terms generally ranging from 10 to 20 years. The leases generally provide for contingent rental based upon operating results (some of which are subject to an annual minimum). Generally, these leases include renewal options for various periods at stipulated rates. ~~Three~~As of December 31, 2009, approximately 5% of our international theatre leases or seven theatres with 2654 screens have a remaining term, including optional renewal periods, of less than ~~five~~six years. Approximately ~~27%~~32% of our international theatre leases, covering 3341 theatres and ~~278~~350 screens, have remaining terms, including optional renewal periods, of between six and 15 years and approximately ~~70%~~63% of our international theatre leases, covering 8582 theatres and ~~707~~662 screens, have remaining terms, including optional renewal periods, of more than 15 years. We lease office space in eight regions in Latin America for our local management.

See Note 2122 to the consolidated financial statements for information regarding our ~~domestic and international~~minimum lease commitments. We periodically review the profitability of each of our theatres, particularly those whose lease terms are nearing expiration, to determine whether to continue its operations.

~~Item 3. Legal Proceedings~~


Item 3.		Legal Proceedings

We resolved a lawsuit filed by the DOJ in March 1999 which alleged certain violations of the ADA relating to wheelchair seating arrangements in certain of our stadium-style theatres. We and the DOJ agreed to a consent order which was entered by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, on November 15, 2004. Under the consent order, we ~~are~~were required to make modifications to wheelchair seating locations in fourteen stadium-style movie theatres and spacing and companion seating modifications in 67 auditoriums at other stadium-styled movie theatres. These modifications ~~must be~~were completed by November 2009. We are currently in compliance with the consent order. Upon completion of these modifications, these theatres ~~will~~did comply with wheelchair seating requirements, and no further modifications ~~will be~~are required to our other stadium-style movie theatres in the United States existing on the date of the consent order. In addition, under the consent order, the DOJ approved the seating plans for nine stadium-styled movie theatres then under construction and also created a safe harbor framework for us to construct all of our future stadium-style movie theatres. The DOJ has stipulated that all theatres built in compliance with the consent order will comply with the wheelchair seating requirements of the ADA. We do not believe that our requirements under the consent order will materially affect our business or financial condition.

From time to time, we are involved in other various legal proceedings arising from the ordinary course of our business operations, such as personal injury claims, employment matters, landlord-tenant disputes and contractual disputes, ~~most~~some of which are covered by insurance. We believe our potential liability, with respect to proceedings currently pending, is not material, individually or in the aggregate, to our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

~~Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders~~

On October 1, 2007, our board of directors approved and recommended to the stockholders an amendment to the Cinemark Holdings, Inc. 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”). On October 15, 2007, a majority of the stockholders approved the First Amendment to the 2006 Plan (the “First Amendment”) and an Information Statement was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on October 16, 2007. The Information Statement was mailed to all stockholders on October 22, 2007 to inform the stockholders that we have obtained the written consent of the requisite holders of common stock to amend the 2006 Plan and to serve as notice to the stockholders of such action in accordance with Section 228(e) of the Delaware General Corporation Law. The First Amendment to the 2006 Plan became effective November 12, 2007. A copy of the First Amendment to the 2006 Plan is attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 15, 2007.


Item 4.		Reserved

1721

PART II

~~Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters~~


Item 5.		Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information and ~~Holder~~Holders of Our Common Stock

Our common equity consists of common stock, which has traded on the New York Stock Exchange since April ~~23,~~24, 2007 under the symbol “CNK.” The following table sets forth the historical high and low sales prices per share of our common stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange for the fiscal periods indicated.

Fiscal 2007
High Low
Second Quarter (April 23, 2007 – June 30, 2007) $ 20.69 $ 16.15
Third Quarter (July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007) $ 19.48 $ 14.83
Fourth Quarter (October 1, 2007 – December 31, 2007) $ 20.00 $ 15.81


	Fiscal 2008				Fiscal 2009
	High		Low		High		Low
First Quarter (January 1, 2009 – March 31, 2009)	$	17.09	$	12.24	$	10.26	$	6.75
Second Quarter (April 1, 2009 – June 30, 2009)	$	15.73	$	12.05	$	11.49	$	8.63
Third Quarter (July 1, 2009 – September 30, 2009)	$	16.30	$	11.08	$	11.65	$	9.50
Fourth Quarter (October 1, 2009 – December 31, 2009)	$	14.51	$	6.73	$	14.85	$	10.08

On February ~~29, 2008,~~28, 2010, there were 39122 stockholders of record of our common stock.

Dividend Policy

~~During~~In August 2007, we initiated a quarterly ~~dividend. Consistent with the disclosures in our 424(b)(1) prospectus, the~~ dividend ~~for the second quarter~~policy. Below is a summary of ~~2007 was based upon the quarterly dividend rate~~dividends paid since initiation of $0.18 per common share, prorated based on the April 27, 2007 closing date of our initial public offering. Based on such proration, a cash dividend of $0.13 per share of common stock was paid on September 18, 2007. The dividend for the third quarter was the first dividend paid by us reflecting a full quarter since our initial public offering and was paid in the amount of $0.18 per share of common stock on December 18, 2007. We paid dividends of approximately $33.1 million in the aggregate during 2007. The divided for the fourth quarter of 2007 was paid in the amount of $0.18 per share of common stock on March 14, 2008.this policy:

Amount per

Date

Date of

Date

Common

Total

Declared

Record

Paid

Share ⁽¹⁾

Dividends

08/13/07

09/04/07

09/18/07

0.13

$13.9 million

11/12/07

12/03/07

12/18/07

0.18

$19.2 million

02/26/08

03/06/08

03/14/08

0.18

$19.3 million

05/09/08

05/30/08

06/12/08

0.18

$19.3 million

08/07/08

08/25/08

09/12/08

0.18

$19.3 million

11/06/08

11/26/08

12/11/08

0.18

$19.6 million

02/13/09

03/05/09

03/20/09

0.18

$19.6 million

05/13/09

06/02/09

06/18/09

0.18

$19.7 million

07/29/09

08/17/09

09/01/09

0.18

$19.7 million

11/04/09

11/25/09

12/10/09

0.18

$19.7 million


⁽¹⁾		The dividend paid on September 18, 2007 was based on a quarterly dividend rate of $0.18 per common share, prorated based on the April 24, 2007 closing date of our initial public offering.

We, at the discretion of the board of directors and subject to applicable law, anticipate paying regular quarterly dividends on our common ~~stock for the foreseeable future.~~stock. The amount, if any, of the dividends to be paid in the future will depend upon our then available cash, anticipated cash needs, overall financial condition, loan agreement restrictions, future prospects for earnings and cash flows, as well as other relevant factors.

Performance Graph

The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock for the period April 24, 2007 ~~(the closing price on the first trading date)~~ through December 31, ~~2007~~2009 (our fiscal year end) with the Standard and Poor’s Corporation Composite 500 Index and a self-determined peer group of two public companies engaged in the motion picture exhibition industry. The peer group consists of Regal Entertainment Group and Carmike Cinemas, Inc.

CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
Based upon initial investment of $100 on April 24, 2007
with dividends reinvested

SOURCE: Yahoo!Finance & Company reports



	4/24/2007		6/29/2007		9/28/2007		12/31/2007		3/31/2008		6/30/2008		9/30/2008		12/31/2008		3/31/2009		6/30/2009		9/30/2009		12/31/2009
Cinemark Holdings Inc.	$	100	$	94	$	98	$	90	$	68	$	69	$	72	$	40	$	50	$	61	$	56	$	78
S&P © 500		100		102		103		99		89		86		79		61		54		62		71		75
Peer Group (2 Stocks)*		100		99		91		58		61		49		46		33		38		52		54		53


*		The 2-Stock Peer Group consists of Regal Entertainment Group and Carmike Cinemas, Inc.

4/24/07 12/31/07
Cinemark Holdings, Inc. $ 100 $ 90
S&P © 500 100 99
Peer group 100 59

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table provides information about the securities authorized for issuance under the equity compensation plans of Cinemark Holdings, Inc. as of December 31, ~~2007:~~2009:

Number of

Securities Remaining

Number of

Weighted

Available for Future

Number of

Weighted

Number of Securities

Securities to be

Average Exercise

Issuance Under

Securities to be

Average Exercise

Remaining Available for

Issued upon

Price of

Equity

Issued upon

Price of

Future Issuance Under

Exercise of

Outstanding

Compensation Plans

Exercise of

Outstanding

Equity Compensation Plans

Outstanding

Options,

(Excluding

Outstanding

Options,

(Excluding Securities

Options, Warrants

Warrants and

Securities Reflected

Options, Warrants

Warrants and

Reflected in the First

Plan Category

and Rights

Rights

in the First Column)

and Rights

Rights

Column)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

6,323,429

7.63

2,202,700

1,231,892

7.63

10,897,498

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

—

Total

6,323,429

7.63

2,202,700

1,231,892

7.63

10,897,498

Use of Proceeds

There has been no material change in the planned use of proceeds from our initial public offering as described in our final prospectus filed with the SEC pursuant to Rule 424(b). Pending the application of the net proceeds, we have invested the proceeds in short-term, investment-grade marketable securities or money market obligations. ~~During July and August 2007, we repurchased in six~~Below is a summary of open market ~~purchases a total of $47.0 million aggregate principal amount at maturity~~repurchases of our 9³/4% senior discount notes for approximately $42.8 million, including accreted interest of $10.9 million and a cash premium of $2.5 million. During November 2007, we repurchased in one open market purchase $22.2 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of our 9³/4% senior discount notes for approximately $20.9 million, including accreted interest of $5.7 million and a cash premium of $1.5 million. During March 2008, we repurchased in one open market purchase $10.0 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of our 9³/4~~% senior discount notes for approximately $9.0 million, including accreted interest of $2.9 million. We~~that were funded ~~these transactions~~ with ~~the~~ proceeds from our initial public ~~offering.~~offering:


	Aggregate
	Principal Amount			Repurchase			Accreted
Date	at Maturity			Price			Interest
July 2007	$	14.5	million	$	13.2	million	$	3.4	million
August 2007	$	32.5	million	$	29.6	million	$	7.5	million
November 2007	$	22.2	million	$	20.9	million	$	5.7	million
March 2008	$	10.0	million	$	9.0	million	$	2.9	million
October 2008	$	30.0	million	$	27.3	million	$	9.8	million
November 2008	$	7.0	million	$	5.9	million	$	2.5	million
Cumulative total with IPO proceeds	$	116.2	million	$	105.9	million	$	31.8	million

1924

~~Item 6. Selected Financial Data~~


Item 6.		Selected Financial Data

The following ~~tables set forth~~table provides our selected consolidated financial and operating data for the periods and at the dates indicated for each of the five most recent years ended December 31, ~~2007.~~2009. On August 2, 2006, Cinemark Holdings, Inc. was formed as the Delaware holding company of Cinemark, Inc. The selected ~~historical information~~financial data presented for periods ~~through~~prior to that date are for Cinemark, Inc. On October 5, 2006, we completed our acquisition of Century Theatres, Inc. Results of operations reflect the inclusion of the Century theatres beginning on the date of acquisition. On April ~~1, 2004 are~~24, 2007, Cinemark Holdings, Inc. completed an initial public offering of its common stock. Effective December 11, 2009, Cinemark, Inc.~~, the predecessor, and the selected historical information for all subsequent periods are of~~ was merged into Cinemark Holdings, Inc., ~~the successor.~~with no accounting impact. You should read the selected consolidated financial and operating data set forth below in conjunction with ~~Management’s~~“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of ~~Operations~~Operations” and ~~with~~ our ~~Consolidated Financial Statements~~audited consolidated financial statements and related notes ~~thereto,~~ appearing elsewhere in this report.


	Cinemark, Inc.										Cinemark Holdings, Inc.								Year Ended December 31,
	Predecessor						Successor												2005			2006		2007				2008			2009
				Period from				Period from											(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
				January 1,				April 2,
				2004				2004			Year Ended December 31,
	Year Ended			to				to
	December			April 1,				December
	31, 2003			2004				31, 2004			2005			2006		2007
				(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Statement of Operations Data(1):
Statement of Operations Data:
Revenues:
Admissions	$	597,548		$	149,134			$	497,865		$	641,240		$	760,275	$	1,087,480		$	641,240		$	760,275	$	1,087,480			$	1,126,977		$	1,293,378
Concession		300,568			72,480				249,141			320,072			375,798		516,509			320,072			375,798		516,509				534,836			602,880
Other		52,756			12,011				43,611			59,285			84,521		78,852			59,285			84,521		78,852				80,474			80,242

Total Revenues	$	950,872		$	233,625			$	790,617		$	1,020,597		$	1,220,594	$	1,682,841
Theatre operating costs		582,574			140,938				477,689			625,496			728,431		1,035,360
Total revenues																			$	1,020,597		$	1,220,594	$	1,682,841			$	1,742,287		$	1,976,500
Film rental and advertising																				347,727			405,987		589,717				612,248			708,160
Concession supplies																				52,507			59,020		81,074				86,618			91,918
Salaries and wages																				101,431			118,616		173,290				180,950			203,437
Facility lease expense		119,517			30,915				97,829			138,477			161,374		212,730			138,477			161,374		212,730				225,595			238,779
Utilities and other																				123,831			144,808		191,279				205,814			222,660
General and administrative expenses		44,286			11,869				39,803			50,884			67,768		79,518			50,884			67,768		79,518				90,788			96,497
Termination of profit participation agreement		—			—				—			—			—		6,952			—			—		6,952				—			—
Stock option compensation and change of control expenses related to the MDP Merger		—			31,995				—			—			—		—
Depreciation and amortization		65,085			16,865				61,353			86,126			99,470		151,716
Total depreciation and amortization																				86,126			99,470		151,716		��		158,034			149,515
Impairment of long-lived assets		5,049			1,000				36,721			51,677			28,537		86,558			51,677			28,537		86,558				113,532			11,858
(Gain) loss on sale of assets and other		(1,202	)		(513	)			3,602			4,436			7,645		(2,953	)		4,436			7,645		(2,953	)			8,488			3,202

Total cost of operations		815,309			233,069				716,997			957,096			1,093,225		1,569,881			957,096			1,093,225		1,569,881				1,682,067			1,726,026

Operating income		135,563			556				73,620			63,501			127,369		112,960		$	63,501		$	127,369	$	112,960			$	60,220		$	250,474

Interest expense		54,163			12,562				58,149			84,082			109,328		145,596		$	84,082		$	109,328	$	145,596			$	116,058		$	102,505
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		47,389			(12,771	)			10,451			(16,000	)		13,526		200,882
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes		(2,740	)		(1,565	)			4,155			—			—		—

Net income (loss)	$	44,649		$	(10,633	)		$	(3,687	)	$	(25,408	)	$	841	$	88,920		$	(24,484	)	$	2,310	$	89,712			$	(44,430	)	$	100,756
Net income (loss) per share:

Net income (loss) attributable to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.																			$	(25,408	)	$	841	$	88,920			$	(48,325	)	$	97,108

Net income (loss) attributable to Cinemark Holdings, Inc. per share:
Basic	$	0.37		$	(0.09	)		$	(0.05	)	$	(0.31	)	$	0.01	$	0.87		$	(0.31	)	$	0.01	$	0.87			$	(0.45	)	$	0.89

Diluted	$	0.37		$	(0.09	)		$	(0.05	)	$	(0.31	)	$	0.01	$	0.85		$	(0.31	)	$	0.01	$	0.85			$	(0.45	)	$	0.87

~~Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations~~


Item 7.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and accompanying notes included in this report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements. See “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” for a discussion of the uncertainties and risk associated with these statements.

Overview

On April 2, 2004, an affiliate of MDP acquired approximately 83% of the capital stock of Cinemark, Inc., pursuant to which a newly formed subsidiary owned by an affiliate of MDP was merged with and into Cinemark, Inc. with Cinemark, Inc. continuing as the surviving corporation. Simultaneously, an affiliate of MDP purchased shares of Cinemark, Inc.’s common stock and became Cinemark, Inc.’s controlling stockholder. Lee Roy Mitchell, Chairman and then Chief Executive Officer, the Mitchell Special Trust, and certain members of management collectively retained a minority ownership of Cinemark, Inc.’s capital stock. In December 2004, MDP sold a portion of its stock in Cinemark, Inc. to outside investors and in July 2005, Cinemark, Inc. issued additional shares to another outside investor.

On August 2, 2006, Cinemark Holdings, Inc. was formed as the Delaware holding company of Cinemark, Inc. On August 7, 2006, the Cinemark, Inc. stockholders entered into a share exchange agreement pursuant to which they agreed to exchange their shares of Class A common stock for an equal number of shares of common stock of Cinemark Holdings, Inc. (“Cinemark Share Exchange”). The Cinemark Share Exchange was completed on October 5, 2006 and facilitated the acquisition of Century Theatres, Inc. (“Century Acquisition”) on that date. On October 5, 2006, Cinemark, Inc. became a wholly owned subsidiary of Cinemark Holdings, Inc. Prior to October 5, 2006, Cinemark Holdings, Inc. had no assets, liabilities or operations. The accompanying consolidated financial statements are reflective of the change in reporting entity that occurred as a result of the Cinemark Share Exchange. Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s consolidated financial statements reflect the accounting basis of its stockholders for all periods presented. On April 24, 2007, Cinemark Holdings, Inc. completed an initial public offering of its common stock. Effective December 11, 2009, Cinemark, Inc. was merged into Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and Cinemark Holdings, Inc. became the holding company of Cinemark USA, Inc.

As of December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, we managed our business under two reportable operating segments – U.S. markets and international markets, in accordance with ~~SFAS No. 131 “~~FASB ASC Topic 280,~~Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information~~Segment Reporting.” See Note 2223 to the consolidated financial statements.

Revenues and Expenses

We generate revenues primarily from box office receipts and concession sales with additional revenues from screen advertising sales and other revenue streams, such as vendor marketing programs, pay phones, ATM machines and electronic video games located in some of our theatres. Our investment in NCM has assisted us in expanding our offerings to advertisers ~~exploring~~and broadening ancillary revenue sources such as digital video monitor advertising, third party branding, and the use of theatres for non-film events. In addition, we are able to use theatres during non-peak hours for concerts, sporting events, and other cultural events. ~~Successful films~~Films released during the year ended December 31, ~~2007~~2009 included~~Spider-Man 3, Shrek the Third, Pirates~~Avatar, Transformers: Revenge of the ~~Caribbean: At World’s Endand~~~~Transformers,~~~~which all grossed over $300 million;~~Fallen, Harry Potter and the ~~Order~~Half-Blood Prince, Up, Twilight Saga: New Moon, The Hangover, Star Trek, Monsters vs. Aliens, Ice Age: Dawn of the ~~Phoenix, Bourne Ultimatum, Ratatouille, I am Legend, National Treasure: Book~~Dinosaurs, The Blind Side, X-Men Origins: Wolverine, Night at the Museum 2: Battle of ~~Secretsand~~~~300,~~~~which all grossed over $200 million; and~~~~Fantastic Four:~~the Smithsonian, The Proposal, 2012, Fast & Furious, G.I. Joe: The Rise of the ~~Silver Surfer, I now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry,~~Cobra, Paul Blart: Mall Cop, Taken, A Christmas Carol, Angels & Demons, Terminator Salvation, Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs, Inglorious Basterds, G-Force, District 9, Couples Retreat, Paranormal Activity,and~~Knocked Up.~~Watchmen. Our revenues are affected by changes in attendance and average admissions and concession revenues per patron. Attendance is primarily affected by the quality and quantity of films released by motion picture studios. Films scheduled for release ~~during 2008~~in 2010 include the carryover ofAvatarand new releases such asAlice in Wonderland, How to Train a Dragon, Clash of the Titans, Iron Man 2, Shrek Forever After, Sex and the City 2, Toy Story 3, Little Fockers, The A Team, Tron: Legacy, Robin Hood, Despicable Me, Tangled, Megamindand another installment of both theTwilight andHarry Potter ~~and the Half-Blood Prince, Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian, The Dark Knight, Wall-E, Hancock, The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperorand the release of 3-D movies such as~~~~Hannah Montana & Miley Cyrus: Best of Both Worlds~~~~and~~~~Journey to the Center of the Earth~~~~. In 2009, a broad slate of 3-D films is expected, including~~~~Monsters vs. Aliens, Ice Age 3,~~~~and~~~~Avatar.~~franchises, among other films.

Film rental costs are variable in nature and fluctuate with our admissions revenues. Film rental costs as a percentage of revenues are generally higher for periods in which more blockbuster films are released. Film rental costs can also vary based on the length of a film’s run. Film rental rates are generally negotiated on a film-by-film and theatre-by-theatre basis. Advertising costs, which are expensed as incurred, are primarily fixed at the theatre level as daily movie directories placed in newspapers represent the largest component of advertising costs. The monthly cost of these advertisements is based on, among other things, the size of the directory and the frequency and size of the newspaper’s circulation.

Utilities and other costs include certain costs that ~~are fixed such as property taxes, certain costs that are variable such as liability insurance, and certain costs that possess~~have both fixed and variable components such as utilities, property taxes, janitorial costs, repairs and maintenance and security services.

Critical Accounting Policies

We prepare our consolidated financial statements in conformity with ~~accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.~~U.S. GAAP. As such, we are required to make certain estimates and assumptions that we believe are reasonable based upon the information available. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. The significant accounting policies, which we believe are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported consolidated financial results, include the following:

Revenue and Expense Recognition

Revenues are recognized when admissions and concession sales are received at the box office. Other revenues primarily consist of screen advertising. Screen advertising revenues are recognized over the period that the related advertising is delivered on-screen or in-theatre. We record proceeds from the sale of gift cards and other advanced sale-type certificates in current liabilities and recognize admissions and concession revenue when a holder redeems the card or certificate. We recognize unredeemed gift cards and other advanced sale-type certificates as revenue only after such a period of time indicates, based on historical experience, the likelihood of redemption is remote, and based on applicable laws and regulations. In evaluating the likelihood of redemption, we consider the period outstanding, the level and frequency of activity, and the period of inactivity.

Film rental costs are accrued based on the applicable box office receipts and either the mutually agreed upon firm terms or a sliding scale formula, which are established prior to the opening of the ~~picture,~~film, or estimates of the final mutually agreed upon settlement, which occurs at the conclusion of the ~~picture~~film run, subject to the film licensing arrangement. Under a firm terms formula, we pay the distributor a mutually agreed upon specified percentage of box office receipts, which reflects either a mutually agreed upon aggregate rate for the life of the film or rates that decline over the term of the run. Under the sliding scale formula, film rental is paid as a percentage of box office revenues using a pre-determined matrix based upon box office performance of the film. The settlement process allows for negotiation of film rental fees upon the conclusion of the film run based upon how the film performs. Estimates are based on the expected success of a film over the length of its run in theatres. The success of a film can typically be determined a few weeks after a film is released when initial box office performance of the film is known. Accordingly, final settlements typically approximate estimates since box office receipts are known at the time the estimate is made and the expected success of a film over the length of its run in theatres can typically be estimated early in the film’s run. The final film settlement amount is negotiated at the conclusion of the film’s run based upon how a film actually performs. If actual settlements are ~~higher~~different than those estimated, ~~additional~~ film rental costs are ~~recorded~~adjusted at that time. We recognize advertising costs and any cost sharing arrangements with film distributors in the same accounting period. Our advertising costs are expensed as incurred.

Facility lease expense is primarily a fixed cost at the theatre level as most of our facility leases require a fixed monthly minimum rent payment. Certain of our leases are subject to monthly percentage rent only, which is accrued each month based on actual revenues. Certain of our other theatres require payment of percentage rent in addition to fixed monthly rent if a target annual revenue level is achieved. Percentage rent expense is recorded for these theatres on a monthly basis if the theatre’s historical performance or forecasted performance indicates that the annual target will be reached. The estimate of percentage rent expense recorded during the year is based on a trailing twelve months of

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We review long-lived assets for impairment indicators on a quarterly basis or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. We assess many factors including the following to determine whether to impair individual theatre assets:

	•		~~actual theatre level cash flows;~~

	•		~~future years budgeted theatre level cash flows;~~

	•		~~theatre property and equipment carrying values;~~

	•		~~theatre goodwill carrying values;~~

	•		~~amortizing intangible asset carrying values;~~

	•		~~the age of a recently built theatre;~~

	•		~~competitive theatres in the marketplace;~~

	•		~~changes in foreign currency exchange rates;~~

	•		~~the impact of recent ticket price changes;~~

	•		~~available lease renewal options; and~~

	•		~~other factors considered relevant in our assessment of impairment of individual theatre assets.~~

actual theatre level cash flows;

future years budgeted theatre level cash flows;

theatre property and equipment carrying values;

amortizing intangible asset carrying values;

the age of a recently built theatre;

competitive theatres in the marketplace;

changes in foreign currency exchange rates;

the impact of recent ticket price changes;

available lease renewal options; and

other factors considered relevant in our assessment of impairment of individual theatre assets.

Long-lived assets are evaluated for impairment on an individual theatre basis, which we believe is the lowest applicable level for which there are identifiable cash flows. The impairment evaluation is based on the estimated undiscounted cash flows from continuing use through the remainder of the theatre’s useful life. The remainder of the useful life correlates with the available remaining lease period, which includes the probability of renewal periods for leased properties and a period of twenty years for fee owned properties. If the estimated undiscounted cash flows are not sufficient to recover a long-lived asset’s carrying value, we then compare the carrying value of the asset group (theatre) with its estimated fair value. ~~Fair values are determined based on a multiple of cash flows, which was seven times for 2005 and eight times for the evaluations performed during 2006 and 2007.~~ When estimated fair value is determined to be lower than the carrying value of the asset group (theatre), the asset group (theatre) is written down to its estimated fair value. Significant judgment is involved in estimating cash flows and fair value. Management’s estimates, which fall under Level 3, are based on historical and projected operating performance, ~~as well as~~ recent market ~~transactions.~~transactions, and current industry trading multiples. Fair value is determined based on a multiple of cash flows, which was eight times for the evaluations performed during 2007 and the first, second and third quarters of 2008 and six and a half times for the evaluation performed during the fourth quarter of 2008 and the evaluations performed during 2009. We reduced the multiple we used to determine fair value during the fourth quarter of 2008 due to the dramatic decline in estimated market values that resulted from a significant decrease in our stock price and the declines in our and our competitors’ market capitalizations that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2008. The long-lived asset impairment charges related to theatre properties recorded during each of the periods presented are specific to theatres that were directly and individually impacted by increased competition, adverse changes in market demographics or adverse changes in the development or the conditions of the areas surrounding the theatre.

Impairment of Goodwill and Intangible Assets

We evaluate goodwill ~~and tradename~~ for impairment annually ~~at fiscal year-end and any time~~during the fourth quarter or whenever events or circumstances indicate the carrying ~~amount~~value of the goodwill and intangible assets may not be fully recoverable. As a result of the NCM Transaction discussed in Note 7, and more specifically the modification of the NCM Exhibitor Services Agreement, which significantly reduced the contractual amounts paid to us, we evaluated the carrying value of our goodwill as of March 31, 2007 (See Notes 10 and 11). We also evaluated the carrying value of our goodwill as of December 31, 2007.might exceed its estimated fair value. We evaluate goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level ~~(generally a theatre)~~ and have allocated goodwill to the reporting unit based on an estimate of its relative fair value. The evaluation is a two-step approach requiring us to compute the fair value of a ~~theatre~~reporting unit and compare it with its carrying value. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, a second step is performed to measure the potential goodwill impairment. Significant judgment is involved in estimating cash flows and fair value. Management’s estimates, which fall under Level 3, are based on historical and projected operating performance, recent market transactions, and current industry trading multiples. Fair value is determined based on a multiple of cash flows, which was ~~seven~~eight times for ~~2005~~the goodwill impairment evaluations performed during 2007 and ~~eight~~six and a half times for the evaluations performed during ~~2006~~2008 and ~~2007. Significant judgment is involved~~2009. We reduced the multiple we used to determine fair value during the fourth quarter of 2008 due to the dramatic decline in ~~estimating cash flows~~estimated market values that resulted from significant decreases in our stock price and ~~fair value. Management’s estimates are based~~our and our competitors’ market capitalizations that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2008. Prior to January 1, 2008, we considered our theatres reporting units for purposes of evaluating goodwill for impairment. Changes in the organization, including changes in the structure of the executive management team, the initial public offering of our common stock, the resulting changes in the level at which the management team evaluates the business on ~~historical~~a regular basis, and ~~projected operating performance as well as recent market transactions. Our policy~~the Century Acquisition that increased the size of ~~allocating~~the theatre base by approximately 25%, led management to

2429

conclude that our U.S. regions and international countries are now more reflective of how we manage and operate our business. Accordingly, the U.S. regions and international countries represent the appropriate reporting units for purposes of evaluating goodwill atfor impairment. Consequently, effective January 1, 2008, management changed the ~~theatre level results~~reporting unit to sixteen regions in ~~more volatile~~the U.S. and each of eight countries internationally (Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama and Guatemala are considered one reporting unit) from approximately four hundred theatres. The goodwill impairment test performed during December 2007 that resulted in the recording of impairment charges ~~on an annual basis~~during the year ended December 31, 2007 reflected the final calculation utilizing theatres as reporting units. The goodwill impairment charges taken during the year ended December 31, 2008 were related to four U.S. regions, one of which was fully impaired and three of which were partially impaired down to estimated fair value. As of December 31, 2009, the carrying value of goodwill allocated to reporting units where the estimated fair value was less than 10% more than the carrying value was approximately $173.0 million. Declines in our stock price or market capitalization, declines in the Company’s attendance due to increased competition in certain regions and/or countries or economic factors that lead to a decline in attendance in any given region or country could negatively affect the Company’s estimated fair values and could result in further impairments of goodwill.

Tradename intangible assets are tested for impairment at least annually during the fourth quarter or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. We estimate the fair value of our tradenames by applying an estimated market ~~conditions and box office performance and~~royalty rate that could be charged for the ~~resulting impact on individual theatres.~~use of our tradename to forecasted future revenues, with an adjustment for the present value of such royalties. If the estimated fair value is less than the carrying value, the tradename intangible asset is written down to the estimated fair value.

Acquisitions

We account for acquisitions under the ~~purchase~~acquisition method of ~~accounting in accordance with SFAS No. 141,~~~~“Business Combinations.”~~accounting. The ~~purchase~~acquisition method requires that ~~we estimate~~ the acquired assets and liabilities, including contingencies, be recorded at fair value ofdetermined on the ~~assets acquired~~acquisition date and ~~liabilities assumed and allocate consideration paid accordingly.~~changes thereafter reflected in income. For significant acquisitions, we obtain independent third party valuation studies for certain of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed to assist us in determining fair value. The estimation of the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed involves a number of estimates and assumptions that could differ materially from the actual amounts recorded. We provide the assumptions, including both quantitative and qualitative information, about the specified asset or liability to the third party valuation firms. We primarily utilize the third parties to accumulate comparative data from multiple sources and assemble a report that summarizes the information obtained. We then use that information to determine fair value. The third party valuation firms are supervised by our personnel who are knowledgeable about valuations and fair value. We evaluate the appropriateness of the valuation methodology utilized by the third party valuation firm.

Income Taxes

We use an asset and liability approach to financial accounting and reporting for income taxes. Deferred income taxes are provided when tax laws and financial accounting standards differ with respect to the amount of income for a year and the basis of assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the carrying amount of deferred tax assets unless it is more likely than not that such assets will be realized. Income taxes are provided on unremitted earnings from foreign subsidiaries unless such earnings are expected to be indefinitely reinvested. Income taxes have also been provided for potential tax assessments. The related tax accruals are recorded in accordance with FASB ~~Interpretation No. 48,~~ASC Topic 740,~~“Accounting for Uncertainty in~~ Income Taxes ~~— an interpretation of SFAS No. 109”~~~~(FIN 48)~~, which ~~we adopted on January 1, 2007. FIN 48~~ clarifies the accounting and reporting for income taxes recognized, ~~in accordance with SFAS No. 109,~~~~“Accounting for Income Taxes”~~, and the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns. The evaluation of aan uncertain tax position ~~in accordance with FIN 48~~ is a two-step process. The first step is recognition: We determine whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. In evaluating whether a tax position has met the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, we ~~should~~ presume that the position would be examined by the appropriate taxing authority that would have full knowledge of all relevant information. The second step is measurement: A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is measured to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. The tax position is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Differences between tax positions taken in a tax return and amounts recognized in the financial statements result in (1) ~~an increase~~a change in a liability for income taxes payable or (2) a ~~reduction of~~change in an income tax refund receivable, ~~or a reduction in~~ a deferred tax asset or ~~an increase in~~ a deferred tax liability or both (1) and (2). We accrue for interest and penalties on our tax provisions for uncertain tax positions.

Recent Developments

Dividend Declaration

On February ~~26, 2008, the Company’s~~25, 2010, our board of directors declared a cash dividend ~~for~~in the ~~fourth quarter of 2007~~amount of $0.18 per ~~share of~~ common ~~stock~~share payable to stockholders of record on March ~~6, 2008.~~5, 2010. The dividend ~~was~~will be paid on March ~~14, 2008.~~19, 2010.

Amendment and Extension of Senior Secured Credit Facility

On March ~~20, 2008,~~2, 2010, we ~~repurchased~~completed an amendment and extension to our existing senior secured credit facility to primarily extend the maturities of the facility and make certain other modifications. Approximately $924.4 million of our $1,083.6 million outstanding term loan debt has been extended from an original maturity date of October 2013 to a maturity date of April 2016. Payments on the extended amount will be due in ~~one open market purchase $10.0 million aggregate~~equal quarterly installments of 0.25% of the extended amount beginning March 31, 2010 through March 31, 2016 with the remaining principal amount due April 30, 2016. The interest rate on this extended portion of the term loan is, at our option, at the base rate plus 2.25% or a eurodollar rate plus 3.25%. The maturity date of, the interest rates applicable to and the quarterly payments for the remaining $159.2 million of our 9³/4~~% senior discount notes~~outstanding term loan did not change.

In addition, the maturity date of $73.5 million of our $150.0 million revolving line of credit has been extended from October 2012 to March 2015. The interest rate on this extended portion of the revolving line of credit is, at our option, at the base rate plus a margin that ranges from 1.75% to 2.00% or a eurodollar rate plus a margin that ranges from 2.75% to 3.00%. The maturity date of and the interest rates applicable to the remaining $76.5 million of our revolving line of credit did not change.

We incurred debt issue costs of approximately $8.6 million related to this amendment and extension.

Earthquake in Chile

On February 27, 2010, an 8.8 magnitude earthquake occurred in Chile, a country in which we have eleven theatres, a local corporate office and approximately 800 employees. For the year ended December 31, 2009, revenues generated by our Chile locations were 1.6% of our total revenues. We have property and business interruption insurance for ~~approximately $9.0 million, including accreted interest~~our Chile locations. The insurance policy covers earthquake damage up to a specified limit with applicable deductibles per location. We expect to reopen seven of ~~$2.9 million. The transaction was funded with proceeds from~~ our ~~initial public offering.~~theatres within the next week and we are continuing to assess the level and nature of the damage to our other four theatres.

DCIP

On March ~~27,2008,~~10, 2010, we signed a master equipment lease agreement and other related agreements (collectively the “agreements”) with Kasima, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of our ~~Board~~joint venture DCIP and a related party to us. Upon signing the agreements, we contributed cash of ~~Directors approved~~$1.2 million and ~~recommended~~our existing digital equipment at a fair value of $16.4 million to DCIP (collectively the “contributions”). The net book value of the contributed equipment was approximately $18.1 million, and as a result, we will record a loss of approximately $1.7 million during the three months ending March 31, 2010. Subsequent to the ~~stockholders~~contributions, we continue to have a 33% voting interest in DCIP and now have a 24.3% economic interest in DCIP.

As a result of these agreements, we will begin a rollout of 3-D compatible digital projection systems to a majority of our first run U.S. theatres. The digital projection systems will be leased from Kasima under a twelve-year lease that contains ten one-year fair value renewal options. The equipment lease agreement also contains a fair value purchase option. Under the equipment lease agreement, we will pay minimum annual rent of one thousand dollars per digital projection system for ~~approval at~~ the ~~2008 annual meeting of stockholders to be held on May 15, 2008 (the “Annual Meeting”), an amendment~~first six and ~~restatement~~a half years from the effective date of the ~~Cinemark Holdings, Inc. 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan, as amended (the~~~~“Restated Incentive Plan).~~~~The Restated Incentive Plan amends~~agreement and ~~restates~~minimum annual rent of three thousand dollars per digital projection system beginning at six and a half years from the ~~Cinemark Holdings, Inc. 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan, as amended (~~effective date through the ~~“2006 Plan”),~~~~to (i) increase~~end of the number of shares reserved for issuance from 9,097,360 shares of Common Stock to 19,100,000 shares of Common Stock and (ii) permit the Compensation Committee to award participants restricted stock units and performance awards. The right of a participant to exercise or receive a grant of a restricted stock unit or performance award may belease term. We are also subject to various types of other rent if such projection systems do not meet minimum performance requirements as outlined in the ~~satisfaction of such performance or objective business criteria as determined by the Compensation Committee. With the exception~~agreements. Certain of the ~~changes identified in (i) and (ii) above, the Restated Incentive Plan does not materially differ from the 2006 Plan. The foregoing does not constitute~~other rent payments are subject to either a ~~complete summary of the Restated Incentive Plan and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the Restated Incentive Plan to be filed as~~monthly or an ~~appendix to the proxy statement for our Annual Meeting to be mailed to our stockholders within 120 days after December 31, 2007.~~annual maximum.

2531

Results of Operations

On October 5, 2006, we completed our acquisition of Century Theatres, Inc. Results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 reflect the inclusion of the Century theatres beginning on the date of acquisition. Results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2005 do not include results of operations for the Century theatres.

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage of revenues represented by certain items reflected in our consolidated statements of operations:


	Year Ended December 31,									Year Ended December 31,
	2005			2006			2007			2007			2008			2009
Operating data (in millions):
Revenues
Admissions	$	641.2		$	760.3		$	1,087.5		$	1,087.5		$	1,127.0		$	1,293.4
Concession		320.1			375.8			516.5			516.5			534.8			602.9
Other		59.3			84.5			78.8			78.8			80.5			80.2

Total revenues	$	1,020.6		$	1,220.6		$	1,682.8		$	1,682.8		$	1,742.3		$	1,976.5

Theatre operating costs⁽²⁾
Cost of operations
Film rentals and advertising	$	347.7		$	406.0		$	589.7		$	589.7		$	612.2		$	708.2
Concession supplies		52.5			59.0			81.1			81.1			86.6			91.9
Salaries and wages		101.5			118.6			173.3			173.3			181.0			203.4
Facility lease expense		138.5			161.4			212.7			212.7			225.6			238.8
Utilities and other		123.8			144.8			191.3			191.3			205.8			222.7
General and administrative expenses											86.5			90.8			96.5
Depreciation and amortization											151.7			158.1			149.5
Impairment of long-lived assets											86.6			113.5			11.8
(Gain) loss on sale of assets and other											(3.0	)		8.5			3.2

Total theatre operating costs	$	764.0		$	889.8		$	1,248.1
Total cost of operations										$	1,569.9		$	1,682.1		$	1,726.0

Operating income										$	112.9		$	60.2		$	250.5

Operating data as a percentage of total revenues:
Revenues
Admissions		62.8	%		62.3	%		64.6	%		64.6	%		64.7	%		65.4	%
Concession		31.4			30.8			30.7			30.7	%		30.7	%		30.5	%
Other		5.8			6.9			4.7			4.7	%		4.6	%		4.1	%

Total revenues		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%

Theatre operating costs⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾
Cost of operations⁽¹⁾
Film rentals and advertising		54.2	%		53.4	%		54.2	%		54.2	%		54.3	%		54.8	%
Concession supplies		16.4			15.7			15.7			15.7	%		16.2	%		15.2	%
Salaries and wages		9.9			9.7			10.3			10.3	%		10.4	%		10.3	%
Facility lease expense		13.6			13.2			12.6			12.6	%		12.9	%		12.1	%
Utilities and other		12.1			11.9			11.4			11.4	%		11.8	%		11.3	%
Total theatre operating costs		74.9	%		72.9	%		74.2	%
General and administrative expenses											5.1	%		5.2	%		4.9	%
Depreciation and amortization											9.0	%		9.1	%		7.6	%
Impairment of long-lived assets											5.2	%		6.5	%		0.6	%
(Gain) loss on sale of assets and other											(0.1	)%		0.5	%		0.2	%
Total cost of operations											93.3	%		96.5	%		87.3	%
Operating income											6.7	%		3.5	%		12.7	%

Average screen count (month end average)		3,239			3,628			4,558			4,558			4,703			4,860

Revenues per average screen	$	315,104		$	336,437		$	369,200
Revenues per average screen (dollars)										$	369,200		$	370,469		$	406,681

Comparison of Years Ended December 31, ~~2007~~2009 and December 31, ~~2006~~2008

Revenues.Total revenues increased ~~$462.2~~$234.2 million to ~~$1,682.8~~$1,976.5 million for ~~2007~~2009 from ~~$1,220.6~~$1,742.3 million for ~~2006,~~2008, representing a ~~37.9%~~13.4% increase. The table below, presented by reportable operating segment, summarizes our year-over-year revenue performance and certain key performance indicators that impact our revenues.

U.S. Operating Segment International Operating Segment Consolidated
Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended
December 31, December 31, December 31,
% % %
2006 2007 Change 2006 2007 Change 2006 2007 Change
Admissions revenues (in millions) $ 577.9 $ 879.1 52.1 % $ 182.4 $ 208.4 14.3 % $ 760.3 $ 1,087.5 43.0 %
Concession revenues (in millions) $ 297.4 $ 424.4 42.7 % $ 78.4 $ 92.1 17.5 % $ 375.8 $ 516.5 37.4 %
Other revenues (in millions)⁽¹⁾
$ 59.4 $ 45.6 (23.2 )% $ 25.1 $ 33.2 32.3 % $ 84.5 $ 78.8 (6.7 )%
Total revenues (in millions)⁽¹⁾
$ 934.7 $ 1,349.1 44.3 % $ 285.9 $ 333.7 16.7 % $ 1,220.6 $ 1,682.8 37.9 %
Attendance (in millions) 118.7 151.7 27.8 % 59.6 61.0 2.3 % 178.3 212.7 19.3 %
Revenues per average screen⁽¹⁾
$ 346,812 $ 376,771 8.6 % $ 306,459 $ 341,451 11.4 % $ 336,437 $ 369,200 9.7 %


								International Operating
	U.S. Operating Segment							Segment							Consolidated
	Year Ended							Year Ended							Year Ended
	December 31,							December 31,							December 31,
					%							%							%
	2009		2008		Change			2009		2008		Change			2009		2008		Change
Admissions revenues⁽¹⁾	$	1,025.9	$	889.1		15.4	%	$	267.5	$	237.9		12.4	%	$	1,293.4	$	1,127.0		14.8	%
Concession revenues⁽¹⁾	$	485.2	$	426.5		13.8	%	$	117.7	$	108.3		8.7	%	$	602.9	$	534.8		12.7	%
Other revenues⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾	$	43.6	$	40.9		6.6	%	$	36.6	$	39.6		(7.6	)%	$	80.2	$	80.5		(0.4	)%
Total revenues⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾	$	1,554.7	$	1,356.5		14.6	%	$	421.8	$	385.8		9.3	%	$	1,976.5	$	1,742.3		13.4	%
Attendance⁽¹⁾		165.1		147.9		11.6	%		71.6		63.4		12.9	%		236.7		211.3		12.0	%
Revenues per average screen⁽²⁾	$	408,017	$	368,313		10.8	%	$	401,828	$	378,252		6.2	%	$	406,681	$	370,469		9.8	%


⁽¹⁾		Amounts in millions.

⁽²⁾		U.S. operating segment revenues include eliminations of intercompany transactions with the international operating segment. See Note 2223 of our consolidated financial statements.

•		Consolidated.The increase in admissions revenues of $166.4 million was primarily attributable to a 12.0% increase in attendance and a 2.4% increase in average ticket price from $5.33 for 2008 to $5.46 for 2009. The increase in concession revenues of $68.1 million was primarily attributable to the 12.0% increase in attendance and a 0.8% increase in concession revenues per patron from $2.53 for 2008 to $2.55 for 2009. The increase in average ticket price was primarily due to incremental 3-D and premium pricing and other price increases, and the increase in concession revenues per patron were primarily due to price increases.

•		U.S.The increase in admissions revenues of $136.8 million was primarily attributable to an 11.6% increase in attendance and a 3.3% increase in average ticket price from $6.01 for 2008 to $6.21 for 2009. The increase in concession revenues of $58.7 million was primarily attributable to the 11.6% increase in attendance and a 2.1% increase in concession revenues per patron from $2.88 for 2008 to $2.94 for 2009. The increase in average ticket price was primarily due to incremental 3-D and premium pricing and other price increases, and the increase in concession revenues per patron was primarily due to price increases.

•		International.The increase in admissions revenues of $29.6 million was primarily attributable to a 12.9% increase in attendance, partially offset by a 0.3% decrease in average ticket price from $3.75 for 2008 to $3.74 for 2009. The increase in concession revenues of $9.4 million was primarily attributable to the 12.9% increase in attendance, partially offset by a 4.1% decrease in concession revenues per patron from $1.71 for 2008 to $1.64 for 2009. The decreases in average ticket price and concession revenues per patron were due to the unfavorable impact of exchange rates during most of the year in certain countries in which we operate. The 7.6% decrease in other revenues was primarily due to the unfavorable impact of exchange rates during most of the year in certain countries in which we operate.

Cost of Operations.The table below summarizes certain of our theatre operating costs by reportable operating segment (in millions).


					International
	U.S.				Operating
	Operating Segment				Segment				Consolidated
	Year Ended				Year Ended				Year Ended
	December 31,				December 31,				December 31,
	2009		2008		2009		2008		2009		2008
Film rentals and advertising	$	572.3	$	494.6	$	135.9	$	117.6	$	708.2	$	612.2
Concession supplies		61.9		58.5		30.0		28.1		91.9		86.6
Salaries and wages		168.8		149.5		34.6		31.5		203.4		181.0
Facility lease expense		178.8		166.8		60.0		58.8		238.8		225.6
Utilities and other		163.5		151.8		59.2		54.0		222.7		205.8

•

Consolidated.Film rentals and advertising costs were $708.2 million, or 54.8% of admissions revenues, for 2009 compared to $612.2 million, or 54.3% of admissions revenues, for 2008. The increase in film rentals and advertising costs of $96.0 million is primarily due to the $166.4 million increase in admissions revenues. The increase in the film rentals and advertising rate is primarily due to higher film rental rates associated with the increased number of blockbuster films released in 2009. Concession supplies expense was $91.9 million, or 15.2% of concession revenues, for 2009, compared to $86.6 million, or 16.2% of concession revenues, for 2008. The decrease in the concession supplies rate is primarily related to the benefit of our new U.S. beverage agreement that was effective at the beginning of 2009.

Salaries and wages increased to $203.4 million for 2009 from $181.0 million for 2008 primarily due to increased staffing levels to support the 12.0% increase in attendance, increased minimum wage rates and new theatre openings. Facility lease expense increased to $238.8 million for 2009 from $225.6 million for 2008 primarily due to new theatres and increased percentage rent related to the 13.4% increase in revenues. Utilities and other costs increased to $222.7 million for 2009 from $205.8 million for 2008 primarily due to increased variable costs related to the 12.0% increase in attendance, increased costs related to new theatres, increased repairs and maintenance expense and increased 3-D equipment rental fees.

•		U.S.Film rentals and advertising costs were $572.3 million, or 55.8% of admissions revenues, for 2009 compared to $494.6 million, or 55.6% of admissions revenues, for 2008. The increase in film rentals and advertising costs of $77.7 million is due primarily to the $136.8 million increase in admissions revenues. The increase in the film rentals and advertising rate is primarily due to higher film rental rates associated with the increased number of blockbuster films released in 2009. Concession supplies expense was $61.9 million, or 12.8% of concession revenues, for 2009, compared to $58.5 million, or 13.7% of concession revenues, for 2008. The decrease in the concession supplies rate is primarily related to the benefit of our new U.S. beverage agreement that was effective at the beginning of 2009.

		Salaries and wages increased to $168.8 million for 2009 from $149.5 million for 2008 primarily due to increased staffing levels to support the 11.6% increase in attendance, increased minimum wage rates and new theatre openings. Facility lease expense increased to $178.8 million for 2009 from $166.8 million for 2008 primarily due to new theatres and increased percentage rent related to the 14.6% increase in revenues. Utilities and other costs increased to $163.5 million for 2009 from $151.8 million for 2008 primarily due to increased variable costs related to the 11.6% increase in attendance, increased costs related to new theatres, increased repairs and maintenance expense and increased 3-D equipment rental fees.

•		International.Film rentals and advertising costs were $135.9 million, or 50.8% of admissions revenues, for 2009 compared to $117.6 million, or 49.4% of admissions revenues, for 2008. The increase in the film rentals and advertising rate is primarily due to higher film rental rates associated with the increased number of blockbuster films released in 2009. Concession supplies expense was $30.0 million, or 25.5% of concession revenues, for 2009 compared to $28.1 million, or 25.9% of concession revenues, for 2008.

		Salaries and wages increased to $34.6 million for 2009 from $31.5 million for 2008 primarily due to increased staffing levels to support the 12.9% increase in attendance, increases in wage rates and new theatre openings. Facility lease expense increased to $60.0 million for 2009 from $58.8 million for 2008 primarily due to new theatres and increased percentage rent related to the 9.3% increase in revenues. Utilities and other costs increased to $59.2 million for 2009 from $54.0 million for 2008 primarily due to increased variable costs related to the 12.9% increase in

attendance, increased costs related to new theatres, increased repairs and maintenance expense and increased 3-D equipment rental fees.

General and Administrative Expenses.General and administrative expenses increased to $96.5 million for 2009 from $90.8 million for 2008. The increase was primarily due to increased salaries and incentive compensation expense of $4.3 million and increased service charges of $1.7 million related to increased credit card activity.

Depreciation and Amortization.Depreciation and amortization expense, including amortization of favorable/ unfavorable leases, was $149.5 million for 2009 compared to $158.1 million for 2008. The decrease was primarily due to a reduction in the depreciable basis of certain of our U.S. assets in 2009 due to a significant amount of the equipment acquired in the Century Acquisition becoming fully depreciated in 2009, the impact on current depreciation from prior impairment charges and the impact of exchange rates in certain countries in which we operate.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets.We recorded asset impairment charges on assets held and used of $11.8 million for 2009 compared to $113.5 million for 2008. Impairment charges for 2009 consisted of $11.4 million of theatre properties and $0.3 million of intangible assets associated with theatre properties, impacting nineteen of our twenty-four reporting units, and $0.1 million related to an equity investment that was written down to estimated fair value. Impairment charges for 2008 consisted of $34.6 million of theatre properties, $78.6 million of goodwill associated with theatre properties, and $0.3 million of intangible assets associated with theatre properties, impacting twenty of our twenty-four reporting units. The long-lived asset impairment charges recorded during each of the periods presented were specific to theatres that were directly and individually impacted by increased competition, adverse changes in market demographics, or adverse changes in the development or the conditions of the areas surrounding the theatre. The goodwill impairment charges taken during the year ended December 31, 2008 were primarily a result of our determination that the multiple used to estimate the fair value of our reporting units should be reduced to reflect the dramatic decline in the market value of our stock price and the declines in our and our competitors’ market capitalizations that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2008. We reduced the multiple from eight times cash flows to six and a half times cash flows, which significantly reduced our estimated fair values. See Notes 11 and 12 to our consolidated financial statements.

Loss on Sale of Assets and Other.We recorded a loss on sale of assets and other of $3.2 million during 2009 compared to $8.5 million during 2008. The loss recorded during 2009 was primarily related to the write-off of theatre equipment that was replaced. The loss recorded during 2008 was primarily related to the write-off of theatre equipment that was replaced, the write-off of prepaid rent for an international theatre, and damages to certain of our theatres in Texas related to Hurricane Ike.

Interest Expense.Interest costs incurred, including amortization of debt issue costs, were $102.5 million for 2009 compared to $116.1 million for 2008. The decrease was primarily due to decreases in interest rates on our debt. See Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion of our long term debt. In addition, during the 2008 period, we recorded a gain of approximately $5.4 million as a component of interest expense related to the change in fair value of one of our interest rate swap agreements that was deemed not highly effective. See Note 15 to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion of our interest rate swap agreements.

Interest Income.We recorded interest income of $4.9 million during 2009 compared to interest income of $13.3 million during 2008. The decrease in interest income was primarily due to lower interest rates earned on our cash investments.

(Gain) Loss on Early Retirement of Debt. During 2009, we recorded a loss on early retirement of debt of $27.9 million as a result of the tender and call premiums paid and other fees related to the repurchase of approximately $419.4 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of Cinemark, Inc.’s 9³/4% senior discount notes and the write-off of unamortized debt issue costs associated with these notes. During 2008, we recorded a gain on early retirement of debt of $1.7 million as a result of the repurchase of $47.0 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of Cinemark, Inc.’s 9³/4% senior discount notes partially offset by the write-off of unamortized debt issue costs. See Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements.

Distributions from NCM.We recorded distributions received from NCM of $20.8 million during 2009 and $18.8 million during 2008, which were in excess of the carrying value of our investment. See Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements.

Income Taxes.Income tax expense of $44.8 million was recorded for 2009 compared to $21.1 million recorded for 2008. The effective tax rate for 2009 was 30.8%, which reflects the benefit of a capital loss. The effective tax rate of (90.1)% for 2008 reflects the impact of our 2008 goodwill impairment charges, which are not deductible for income tax

purposes. The effective tax rate in 2008 net of the impact from the goodwill impairment charges would have been approximately 41.0%. See Note 21 to our consolidated financial statements.

Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007

Revenues.Total revenues increased $59.5 million to $1,742.3 million for 2008 from $1,682.8 million for 2007, representing a 3.5% increase. The table below, presented by reportable operating segment, summarizes our year-over-year revenue performance and certain key performance indicators that impact our revenues.


								International Operating
	U.S. Operating Segment							Segment							Consolidated
	Year Ended							Year Ended							Year Ended
	December 31,							December 31,							December 31,
					%							%							%
	2008		2007		Change			2008		2007		Change			2008		2007		Change
Admissions revenues⁽¹⁾	$	889.1	$	879.1		1.1	%	$	237.9	$	208.4		14.2	%	$	1,127.0	$	1,087.5		3.6	%
Concession revenues⁽¹⁾	$	426.5	$	424.4		0.5	%	$	108.3	$	92.1		17.6	%	$	534.8	$	516.5		3.5	%
Other revenues⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾	$	40.9	$	45.6		(10.3	%)	$	39.6	$	33.2		19.3	%	$	80.5	$	78.8		2.2	%
Total revenues⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾	$	1,356.5	$	1,349.1		0.5	%	$	385.8	$	333.7		15.6	%	$	1,742.3	$	1,682.8		3.5	%
Attendance⁽¹⁾		147.9		151.7		(2.5	%)		63.4		61.0		3.9	%		211.3		212.7		(0.7	%)
Revenues per average screen⁽²⁾	$	368,313	$	376,771		(2.2	%)	$	378,252	$	341,451		10.8	%	$	370,469	$	369,200		0.3	%


⁽¹⁾		Amounts in millions.

⁽²⁾		U.S. operating segment revenues include eliminations of intercompany transactions with the international operating segment. See Note 23 of our consolidated financial statements.

•		Consolidated. The increase in admissions revenues of ~~$327.2~~$39.5 million was attributable to a ~~19.3% increase in attendance from 178.3 million patrons for 2006 to 212.7 million patrons for 2007, which contributed $165.0 million, and a 20.0%~~4.3% increase in average ticket price from ~~$4.26 for 2006 to~~ $5.11 for 2007 ~~which contributed $162.2 million, and reflects the full year of operations of the 77 Century theatres acquired during the fourth quarter of 2006.~~to $5.33 for 2008, partially offset by a 0.7% decline in attendance. The increase in concession revenues of ~~$140.7~~$18.3 million was attributable to ~~the 19.3% increase in attendance, which contributed $84.5 million, and~~ a ~~15.2%~~4.1% increase in concession revenues per patron from ~~$2.11 for 2006 to~~ $2.43 for 2007 ~~which contributed $56.2 million, and reflects~~to $2.53 for 2008, partially offset by the ~~full year of operations of the 77 Century theatres acquired during the fourth quarter of 2006. The increase~~decline in ~~attendance was attributable to the additional attendance from the 77 Century theatres acquired, the solid slate of films released during 2007 and new theatre openings.~~attendance. The increases in average ticket price and concession revenues per patron were due to ~~the higher ticket price structure at the 77 Century theatres acquired,~~ price increases and favorable exchange rates during most of the year in certain countries in which we operate. The ~~6.7%~~2.2% increase in other revenues was primarily attributable to increased screen advertising and other ancillary revenues in certain of our international locations and the favorable impact of exchange rates during most of the year in certain countries in which we operate.

•		U.S. The increase in admissions revenues of $10.0 million was attributable to a 3.8% increase in average ticket price from $5.79 for 2007 to $6.01 for 2008, partially offset by a 2.5% decrease in attendance. The increase in concession revenues of $2.1 million was attributable to a 2.9% increase in concession revenues per patron from $2.80 for 2007 to $2.88 for 2008, partially offset by the decline in attendance. The increases in average ticket price and concession revenues per patron were due to price increases. The 10.3% decrease in other revenues was primarily attributable to reduced screen advertising revenues earned under the ~~amended Exhibitor Services Agreement with NCM. See Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.~~

•

~~U.S.~~ The increase in admissions revenues of $301.2 million was attributable to a 27.8% increase in attendance from 118.7 million patrons for 2006 to 151.7 million patrons for 2007, which contributed $160.7 million, and a 18.9% increase in average ticket price from $4.87 for 2006 to $5.79 for 2007, which contributed $140.5 million, and reflects the full year of operations of the 77 Century theatres acquired during the fourth quarter of 2006. The increase in concession revenues of $127.0 million was attributable to the 27.8% increase in attendance, which contributed $82.6 million, and an 11.6% increase in concession revenues per patron from $2.51 for 2006 to $2.80 for 2007, which contributed $44.4 million, and reflects the full year of operations of the 77 Century theatres acquired during the fourth quarter of 2006. The increase in attendance was attributable to the additional attendance from the 77 Century theatres acquired, the solid slate of films released during 2007 and new theatre openings. The increases in average ticket price and concession revenues per patron were due to the higher ticket price structure at the 77 Century theatres acquired and price increases. The 23.2% decrease in other revenues was primarily attributable to reduced screen advertising revenues earned under the amended Exhibitor Services Agreementexhibitor services agreement with NCM. See Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.

•

International. The increase in admissions revenues of ~~$26.0~~$29.5 million was attributable to a ~~2.3% increase in attendance from 59.6 million patrons for 2006 to 61.0 million patrons for 2007, which contributed $4.3 million, and an 11.8%~~9.6% increase in average ticket price from ~~$3.06 for 2006 to~~ $3.42 for 2007 ~~which contributed $21.7 million.~~to $3.75 for 2008 and a 3.9% increase in attendance. The increase in concession revenues of ~~$13.7~~$16.2 million was attributable to ~~the 2.3% increase in attendance, which contributed $1.9 million, and~~ a ~~14.4%~~13.2% increase in concession revenues per patron from ~~$1.32 for 2006 to~~ $1.51 for 2007 ~~which contributed $11.8 million. The~~to $1.71 for 2008 and the increase in ~~attendance was primarily due to new theatre openings.~~attendance. The increases in average ticket price and concession revenues per patron were due to price increases and favorable exchange rates during most of the year in certain countries in which we operate. The 19.3% increase in other revenues was primarily due to increased screen advertising and other ancillary revenues and the favorable impact of exchange rates during most of the year in certain countries in which we operate.

2736

•		Consolidated. Film rentals and advertising costs were $612.2 million, or 54.3% of admissions revenues, for 2008 compared to $589.7 million, or 54.2% of admissions revenues, for ~~2007 compared to $406.0 million, or 53.4% of admissions revenues, for 2006.~~2007. The increase in film rentals and advertising costs for ~~2007~~2008 of ~~$183.7~~$22.5 million iswas primarily due to a ~~$327.2~~$39.5 million increase in admissions ~~revenues, which contributed $177.3 million, and an increase in our film rental and advertising rate due to higher rates on certain blockbuster sequels in 2007, which contributed $6.4 million.~~revenues. Concession supplies expense was $86.6 million, or 16.2% of concession revenues, for 2008 compared to $81.1 million, or 15.7% of concession revenues, for ~~2007 compared to $59.0 million, or 15.7% of concession revenues, for 2006.~~2007. The increase in concession supplies expense of ~~$22.1~~$5.5 million iswas primarily due to an $18.3 million increase in concession revenues and an increase in the concession supplies rate. The increased rate was primarily due to the relative increase in concession ~~revenues.~~revenues from our international operations and increases in product costs from some of our international concession suppliers.

		Salaries and wages increased to $181.0 million for 2008 from $173.3 million for 2007, ~~from $118.6 million for 2006 primarily due to the additional salaries and wages related to the 77 Century theatres, the increase in minimum wages in the U.S., and new theatre openings. Facility~~facility lease expense increased to $225.6 million for 2008 from $212.7 million for 2007 ~~from $161.4 million for 2006 primarily due to the additional expense related to the 77 Century theatres, increased percentage rent related to the increased revenues~~ and ~~new theatre openings. Utilities~~utilities and other costs increased to $205.8 million for 2008 from $191.3 million for 2007, ~~from $144.8 million for 2006~~all of which increased primarily due to ~~the additional costs related to the 77 Century theatres and~~increased revenues, new theatre ~~openings.~~openings and the impact of exchange rates in certain countries in which we operate.


•		U.S. Film rentals and advertising costs were $494.6 million, or 55.6% of admissions revenues, for 2008 compared to $485.2 million, or 55.2% of admissions revenues, for ~~2007 compared to $315.4 million, or 54.6% of admissions revenues, for 2006.~~2007. The increase in film rentals and advertising costs for ~~2007~~2008 of ~~$169.8~~$9.4 million iswas primarily due to ~~a $301.2 million~~the increase in admissions revenues ~~which contributed $164.4 million,~~ and ~~an increase in our~~higher film rentals and advertising ~~rate due to higher rates on certain blockbuster sequels in 2007, which contributed $5.4 million.~~rates. Concession supplies expense was $58.5 million, or 13.7% of concession revenues, for 2008 compared to $57.8 million, or 13.6% of concession revenues, for 2007 compared to $38.7 million, or 13.0% of concession revenues, for 2006. The increase in concession supplies expense of $19.1 million is due to increased concession revenues, which contributed $16.6 million, and an increase in our concession supplies rate, which contributed $2.5 million, both of which were attributable to the 77 Century theatres.2007.

		Salaries and wages increased to $149.5 million for 2008 from $146.7 million for 2007, ~~from $95.8 million for 2006 primarily due to the additional salaries and wages related to the 77 Century theatres, the increase in minimum wages in the U.S., and new theatre openings. Facility~~facility lease expense increased to $166.8 million for 2008 from $161.7 million for 2007 ~~from $117.0 million for 2006 primarily due to the additional expense related to the 77 Century theatres~~ and ~~new theatre openings. Utilities~~utilities and other costs increased to $151.8 million for 2008 from $149.0 million for 2007, ~~from $108.3 million for 2006~~all of which increased primarily due to ~~the additional costs related to the 77 Century theatres and~~ new theatre openings.

Termination of Profit Participation Agreement.Upon consummation of our initial public offering on April 24, 2007, we exercised our option to terminate the amended and restated profit participation agreement with our CEO Alan Stock and purchased Mr. Stock’s profit interest in two theatres onduring May 3, 2007 for ~~a price of~~ $6.9 million pursuant to the terms of the amended and restated profit participation agreement. In addition, we incurred $0.1 million of payroll taxes related to the termination. See Note 2324 to our consolidated financial statements.

Depreciation and Amortization.Depreciation and amortization expense, including amortization of favorable leases, was $158.1 million for 2008 compared to $151.7 million for 2007 ~~compared to $99.5 million for 2006~~ primarily due to ~~the Century Acquisition and~~ new theatre openings.

Impairment of Long-Lived ~~Assets~~Assets.. We recorded asset impairment charges on assets held and used of $113.5 million for 2008 compared to $86.6 million for ~~2007 compared to $28.5 million for 2006.~~2007. Impairment charges for ~~2007~~2008 consisted of $34.6 million of theatre properties, $78.6 million of goodwill associated with theatre properties, and ~~2006 included the write-down~~$0.3 million of ~~theatres to their fair values.~~intangible assets associated with theatre properties, impacting twenty of our twenty-four reporting units. Impairment charges for 2007 consisted of $14.2 million of theatre properties, $67.7 million of goodwill associated with theatre properties, and $4.7 million of intangible assets associated with theatre ~~properties. Impairment~~properties, impacting twenty of our twenty-four reporting units. The long-lived asset impairment charges ~~for 2006 consisted~~recorded during each of ~~$13.6 million~~the periods presented were specific to theatres that were directly and individually impacted by increased competition, adverse changes in market demographics, or adverse changes in the development or the conditions of ~~theatre properties, $13.6 million~~the areas surrounding the theatre. The goodwill impairment charges taken during the year ended December 31, 2008 were primarily a result of our determination that the multiple used to estimate the fair value of our reporting units should be reduced to reflect the dramatic decline in the market value of our stock price and the declines in our and our competitors’ market capitalizations that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2008. We reduced the multiple from eight times cash flows to six and a half times cash flows, which significantly reduced our estimated fair values. The goodwill ~~associated with theatre properties and $1.3 million of intangible assets associated with theatre properties. During 2006, we recorded approximately $658.5 million of goodwill as~~impairment charges taken during the year ended December 31, 2007 were primarily a result of the ~~Century Acquisition. We record goodwill at~~modification of the ~~theatre level,~~Company’s Exhibitor Services Agreement with NCM, which ~~results in more volatile impairment charges on an annual basis due~~significantly reduced the contractual amounts paid to ~~changes in market conditions and box office performance and~~ the resulting impact on individual theatres. Significant judgment is involved in estimating cash flows and fair value. Management’s estimates are based on historical and projected operating performance as well as recent market transactions.Company (see Note 7 to our audited consolidated financial statements). See Notes 1011 and 1112 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

(Gain) Loss on Sale of Assets and Other.We recorded a loss on sale of assets and other of $8.5 million during 2008 compared to a gain on sale of assets and other of $3.0 million during ~~2007 compared~~2007. The loss recorded during 2008 was primarily related to ~~a loss on~~ the ~~sale~~write-off of ~~assets~~theatre equipment that was replaced, the write-off of prepaid rent for an international theatre, and ~~other~~damages to certain of ~~$7.6 million during 2006.~~our theatres in Texas related to Hurricane Ike. The gain recorded during 2007 primarily related to the sale of real property associated with one theatre in the U.S. The loss recorded during 2006 primarily related to a loss on the exchange of a theatre in the United States with a third party, lease termination fees and asset write-offs incurred due to theatre closures and the retirement of certain theatre assets that were replaced.

Interest Expense.Interest costs incurred, including amortization of debt issue costs, was $116.1 million for 2008 compared to $145.6 million for ~~2007 compared to $109.3 million for 2006.~~2007. The ~~increase~~decrease was primarily due to the ~~financing associated with~~repurchase of substantially all of our outstanding 9% senior subordinated notes that occurred during March and April 2007, the ~~Century Acquisition.~~repurchase of a portion of our 9³/4% senior discount notes during the second half of 2007 and 2008, and a reduction in the variable interest rates on a portion of our long-term debt. See Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion of our long term debt. In addition, during the 2008 period, we recorded a gain of approximately $5.4 million as a component of interest expense related to the change in fair value of one of our interest rate swap agreements that was deemed not highly effective. See Note 15 to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion of our interest rate swap agreements.

Interest Income.We recorded interest income of $13.3 million during the 2008 period compared to interest income of $18.3 million during the 2007 period. The decrease in interest income was primarily due to lower interest rates earned on our cash investments.

Gain on NCM Transaction.WeDuring 2007, we recorded a gain of $210.8 million on the sale of a portion of our equity investment in NCM in conjunction with the initial public offering of NCM, Inc. ~~during 2007.~~common stock. Our ownership interest in NCM was reduced from approximately 25% to approximately 14% as part of this sale of stock in the offering. See Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements.

Gain on Fandango Transaction.WeDuring 2007, we recorded a gain of $9.2 million as a result of the sale of our investment in stock of Fandango, Inc. See Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements.

(Gain) Loss on Early Retirement of Debt. During 2008, we recorded a gain on early retirement of debt of $1.7 million as a result of the repurchase of $47.0 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of Cinemark, Inc.’s 9³/4% senior discount notes partially offset by the write-off of unamortized debt issue costs. During 2007, we recorded a loss on early retirement of debt of $13.5 million ~~which was~~as a result of the repurchase of $332.1 ~~million aggregate principal amount of our 9% senior subordinated notes and the repurchase of $69.2 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of our 9~~³/4% senior discount notes, all of which resulted in the write-off of unamortized debt issue costs and the payment of premiums, fees and expenses. During 2006, we recorded a loss on early retirement of debt of $8.3 million which was a result of the refinancing associated with the Century Acquisition, the repurchase of $10.0 million aggregate principal amount of Cinemark USA, Inc.’s 9% senior subordinated notes and the repurchase of ~~$39.8~~$69.2 million aggregate principal amount at

senior discount notes, ~~all of which resulted in~~and the related write-off of unamortized debt issue costs and the payment of premiums, fees and expenses. See ~~Notes 6 and 13~~Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements.

Distributions from NCM.We recorded distributions received from NCM of $18.8 million during 2008 and $11.5 million during 2007, which were in excess of the carrying value of our investment. See Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements.

Income Taxes.Income tax expense of ~~$112.0~~$21.1 million was recorded for ~~2007~~2008 compared to ~~$12.7~~$112.0 million recorded for ~~2006.~~2007. The effective tax rate of ~~55.7%~~(90.1)% for 2008 reflects the impact of our 2008 goodwill impairment charges, which are not deductible for income tax purposes. The effective tax rate in 2008 net of the impact from the goodwill impairment charges would have been approximately 41.0%. The effective tax rate of 55.5% for 2007 reflects the impact of our 2007 goodwill impairment charges, which are not deductible for income tax purposes. The effective tax rate in 2007 net of the impact from the goodwill impairment charges would have been approximately 41.7%. ~~The effective tax rate for 2006 reflects the impact of purchase accounting adjustments resulting from the Century Acquisition.~~ See ~~Notes 6 and 20~~Note 21 to our consolidated financial statements.

~~Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005~~

~~Revenues.~~Total revenues increased $200.0 million to $1,220.6 million for 2006 from $1,020.6 million for 2005, representing a 19.6% increase. The table below, presented by reportable operating segment, summarizes our year-over-year revenue performance and certain key performance indicators that impact our revenues.

U.S. Operating Segment International Operating Segment Consolidated
Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended
December 31, December 31, December 31,
% % %
2005 2006 Change 2005 2006 Change 2005 2006 Change
Admissions revenues (in millions) $ 472.0 $ 577.9 22.4 % $ 169.2 $ 182.4 7.8 % $ 641.2 $ 760.3 18.6 %
Concession revenues (in millions) $ 248.7 $ 297.4 19.6 % $ 71.4 $ 78.4 9.8 % $ 320.1 $ 375.8 17.4 %
Other revenues (in millions)⁽¹⁾
$ 35.6 $ 59.4 66.9 % $ 23.7 $ 25.1 5.9 % $ 59.3 $ 84.5 42.5 %
Total revenues (in millions)⁽¹⁾
$ 756.3 $ 934.7 23.6 % $ 264.3 $ 285.9 8.2 % $ 1,020.6 $ 1,220.6 19.6 %
Attendance (in millions) 105.6 118.7 12.4 % 60.1 59.6 (1.0 )% 165.7 178.3 7.6 %
Revenues per average screen⁽¹⁾
$ 321,833 $ 346,812 7.8 % $ 297,316 $ 306,459 3.1 % $ 315,104 $ 336,437 6.8 %


⁽¹⁾		~~U.S. operating segment revenues include eliminations of intercompany transactions with the international operating segment. See Note 22 of our consolidated financial statements.~~

•

~~Consolidated.~~ The increase in admissions revenues of $119.1 million was attributable to a 7.6% increase in attendance from 165.7 million patrons for 2005 to 178.3 million patrons for 2006, which contributed $57.2 million, and a 10.2% increase in average ticket price from $3.87 for 2005 to $4.26 for 2006, which contributed $61.9 million. This increase included additional admissions revenues for the 77 Century theatres acquired during the fourth quarter of 2006. The increase in concession revenues of $55.7 million was attributable to the 7.6% increase in attendance, which contributed $30.3 million, and a 9.1% increase in concession revenues per patron from $1.93 for 2005 to $2.11 for 2006, which contributed $25.4 million. This increase included additional concession revenues for the 77 Century theatres acquired during the fourth quarter. The increase in attendance was attributable to the additional attendance from the 77 Century theatres acquired, the solid slate of films released during 2006 and new theatre openings. The increases in average ticket price and concession revenues per patron were due to the higher ticket price structure at the 77 Century theatres acquired, price increases and favorable exchange rates in certain countries in which we operate. The 42.5% increase in other revenues was primarily attributable to incremental screen advertising revenues resulting from our participation in the NCM joint venture.

•

~~U.S.~~ The increase in admissions revenues of $105.9 million was attributable to a 12.4% increase in attendance from 105.6 million patrons for 2005 to 118.7 million patrons for 2006, which contributed $58.7 million, and a 8.9% increase in average ticket price from $4.47 for 2005 to $4.87 for 2006, which contributed $47.2 million. This increase included additional admissions revenues for the 77 Century theatres acquired during the fourth quarter of 2006. The increase in concession revenues of $48.7 million was attributable to the 12.4% increase in attendance, which contributed $31.0 million, and a 6.3% increase in concession revenues per patron from $2.36 for 2005 to $2.51 for 2006, which contributed $17.7 million. This increase included additional concession revenues for the 77 Century theatres acquired during the fourth quarter. The increase in attendance was attributable to additional attendance from the 77 Century theatres acquired, the solid slate of films released during 2006 and new theatre openings. The increases in average ticket price and concession revenues per patron were due to the higher ticket price structure at

the 77 Century theatres acquired and price increases. The 66.9% increase in other revenues was primarily attributable to incremental screen advertising revenues resulting from our participation in the joint venture with NCM.

•

~~International.~~ The increase in admissions revenues of $13.2 million was attributable to an 8.8% increase in average ticket price from $2.82 for 2005 to $3.06 for 2006, which contributed $14.7 million, partially offset by a 1.0% decrease in attendance, which contributed $(1.5) million. The decrease in attendance was due to increased competition in certain markets. The increase in concession revenues of $7.0 million was attributable to a 10.9% increase in concession revenues per patron from $1.19 for 2005 to $1.32 for 2006, which contributed $7.7 million, partially offset by the 1.0% decrease in attendance, which contributed $(0.7) million. The increases in average ticket price and concession revenues per patron were due to price increases and favorable exchange rates in certain countries in which we operate.

~~Theatre Operating Costs (excludes depreciation and amortization expense).~~Theatre operating costs were $889.8 million, or 72.9% of revenues, for 2006 compared to $764.0 million, or 74.9% of revenues, for 2005. The decrease, as a percentage of revenues, was primarily due to the increase in revenues and the fixed nature of some of our theatre operating costs, such as components of salaries and wages, facility lease expense, and utilities and other costs. The table below, presented by reportable operating segment, summarizes our year-over-year theatre operating costs.

International Operating
U.S. Operating Segment Segment Consolidated
Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended
December 31, December 31, December 31,
2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006
Film rentals and advertising $ 263.7 $ 315.4 $ 84.0 $ 90.6 $ 347.7 $ 406.0
Concession supplies 34.5 38.7 18.0 20.3 $ 52.5 $ 59.0
Salaries and wages 80.8 95.8 20.7 22.8 $ 101.5 $ 118.6
Facility lease expense 97.7 117.0 40.8 44.4 $ 138.5 $ 161.4
Utilities and other 90.7 108.3 33.1 36.5 $ 123.8 $ 144.8

Total theatre operating costs $ 567.4 $ 675.2 $ 196.6 $ 214.6 $ 764.0 $ 889.8

•		~~Consolidated.~~ Film rentals and advertising costs were $406.0 million, or 53.4% of admissions revenues, for 2006 compared to $347.7 million, or 54.2% of admissions revenues, for 2005. The increase in film rentals and advertising costs for 2006 of $58.3 million is due to increased admissions revenues, which contributed $65.7 million, and a decrease in our film rental and advertising rate, which contributed $(7.4) million. The decrease in film rentals and advertising costs as a percentage of admissions revenues was due to a more favorable mix of films resulting in lower average film rental rates in 2006 compared with 2005 which had certain blockbuster films with higher than average film rental rates. Concession supplies expense was $59.0 million, or 15.7% of concession revenues, for 2006 compared to $52.5 million, or 16.4% of concession revenues, for 2005. The increase in concession supplies expense of $6.5 million is primarily due to increased concession revenues, which contributed $8.5 million, and a decrease in our concession supplies rate, which contributed $(2.0) million. The decrease in concession supplies expense as a percentage of revenues was primarily due to concession sales price increases.

		Salaries and wages increased to $118.6 million for 2006 from $101.5 million for 2005 primarily due to the additional salaries and wages related to the 77 Century theatres, the increase in attendance and new theatre openings. Facility lease expense increased to $161.4 million for 2006 from $138.5 million for 2005 primarily due to the additional expense related to the 77 Century theatres, increased percentage rent related to the increased revenues and new theatre openings. Utilities and other costs increased to $144.8 million for 2006 from $123.8 million for 2005 primarily due to the additional costs related to the 77 Century theatres, higher utility and janitorial supplies costs at our existing theatres and new theatre openings.

•

~~U.S.~~ Film rentals and advertising costs were $315.4 million, or 54.6% of admissions revenues, for 2006 compared to $263.7 million, or 55.9% of admissions revenues, for 2005. The increase in film rentals and advertising costs for 2006 of $51.7 million is due to increased admissions revenues, which contributed $59.2 million, and a decrease in our film rentals and advertising rate, which contributed $(7.5) million. The decrease in film rentals and advertising costs as a percentage of admissions revenues was due to a more favorable mix of films resulting in lower average film rental rates in 2006 compared with 2005 which had certain blockbuster films with higher than average film rental rates. Concession supplies expense was $38.7 million, or 13.0% of concession revenues, for 2006 compared to

$34.5 million, or 13.9% of concession revenues, for 2005. The increase in concession supplies expense of $4.2 million is due to increased concession revenues, which contributed $6.7 million, and a decrease in our concession supplies rate, which contributed $(2.5) million. The decrease in concession supplies expense as a percentage of revenues was primarily due to concession sales price increases.

		Salaries and wages increased to $95.8 million for 2006 from $80.8 million for 2005 primarily due to the additional salaries and wages related to the 77 Century theatres, the increase in attendance and new theatre openings. Facility lease expense increased to $117.0 million for 2006 from $97.7 million for 2005 primarily due to the additional expense related to the 77 Century theatres, increased percentage rent related to increased revenues and new theatre openings. Utilities and other costs increased to $108.3 million for 2006 from $90.7 million for 2005 primarily due to the additional costs related to the 77 Century theatres, higher utility and janitorial supplies costs at our existing theatres and new theatre openings.

•		~~International.~~ Film rentals and advertising costs were $90.6 million, or 49.7% of admissions revenues, for 2006 compared to $84.0 million, or 49.6% of admissions revenues, for 2005. The increase in film rentals and advertising costs for 2006 is primarily due to increased admissions revenues. Concession supplies expense was $20.3 million, or 25.9% of concession revenues, for 2006 compared to $18.0 million, or 25.2% of concession revenues, for 2005. The increase in concession supplies expense of $2.3 million is due to increased concession revenues, which contributed $1.8 million, and an increase in our concession supplies rate, which contributed $0.5 million.

		Salaries and wages increased to $22.8 million for 2006 from $20.7 million for 2005 primarily due to new theatre openings. Facility lease expense increased to $44.4 million for 2006 from $40.8 million for 2005 primarily due to increased percentage rent related to increased revenues and new theatre openings. Utilities and other costs increased to $36.5 million for 2006 from $33.1 million for 2005 primarily due to higher utility and janitorial supplies costs at our existing theatres and new theatre openings.

~~General and Administrative Expenses.~~General and administrative expenses increased to $67.8 million for 2006 from $50.9 million for 2005 primarily due to a $3.7 million increase due to incentive compensation expense, a $3.0 million increase in salaries and wages, a $2.9 million increase to stock option compensation expense related to the adoption of SFAS No. 123 (R), a $1.3 million increase in service charges related to increased credit card activity, and additional overhead costs associated with the integration of Century.

~~Depreciation and Amortization.~~Depreciation and amortization expense, including amortization of favorable leases, was $99.5 million for 2006 compared to $86.1 million for 2005 primarily due to the Century Acquisition and new theatre openings.

~~Impairment of Long-Lived Assets~~. We recorded asset impairment charges on assets held and used of $28.5 million for 2006 compared to $51.7 million for 2005. Impairment charges for 2006 and 2005 included the write-down of theatres to their fair values. Impairment charges for 2006 consisted of $13.6 million of theatre properties, $13.6 million of goodwill associated with theatre properties and $1.3 million of intangible assets associated with theatre properties. Impairment charges for 2005 consisted of $6.4 million of theatre properties and $45.3 million of goodwill associated with theatre properties. We record goodwill at the theatre level, which results in more volatile impairment charges on an annual basis due to changes in market conditions and box office performance and the resulting impact on individual theatres. Significant judgment is involved in estimating cash flows and fair value. Management’s estimates are based on historical and projected operating performance as well as recent market transactions. See Notes 10 and 11 to our consolidated financial statements.

~~Loss on Sale of Assets and Other.~~We recorded a loss on sale of assets and other of $7.6 million during 2006 compared to $4.4 million during 2005. The loss recorded during 2006 primarily related to a loss on the exchange of a theatre in the United States with a third party, lease termination fees and asset write-offs incurred due to theatre closures and the replacement of certain theatre assets. The loss recorded during 2005 was primarily due to property damages sustained at three of our theatres due to hurricanes along the Gulf of Mexico coast and the write-off of some theatre equipment that was replaced.

~~Interest Expense.~~Interest costs incurred, including amortization of debt issue costs, was $109.3 million for 2006 compared to $84.1 million for 2005. The increase was primarily due to the financing associated with the Century Acquisition.

~~Loss on Early Retirement of Debt~~. During 2006, we recorded a loss on early retirement of debt of $8.3 million which was a result of the refinancing associated with the Century Acquisition, the repurchase of $10.0 million aggregate principal amount of Cinemark USA, Inc.’s 9% senior subordinated notes, and the repurchase of $39.8 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of Cinemark, Inc.’s 9³/4~~% senior discount notes, all of which resulted in the write-off of unamortized debt issue costs and the payment of fees and expenses. See Notes 6 and 13 to our consolidated financial statements.~~

~~Income Taxes.~~Income tax expense of $12.7 million was recorded for 2006 compared to $9.4 million recorded for 2005. The effective tax rate for 2006 reflects the impact of purchase accounting adjustments resulting from the Century Acquisition. See Notes 6 and 20 to our consolidated financial statements.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Operating Activities

We primarily collect our revenues in cash, mainly through box office receipts and the sale of ~~concession supplies.~~concessions. In addition, a majority of our theatres provide the patron a choice of using a credit card, in place of cash, which we convert to cash over a range from one to six days. Because our revenues are received in cash prior to the payment of related expenses, we have an operating “float” and historically have not required traditional working capital financing. Cash provided by operating activities amounted to ~~$165.3~~$276.0 million, ~~$155.7~~$257.3 million and ~~$276.0~~$176.8 million for the years ended December 31, ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 and ~~2007,~~2009, respectively. ~~The increase~~For the year ended December 31, 2009, the decrease in cash provided by operating activities ~~for the year ended December 31, 2007~~ is ~~primarily~~ due to the ~~proceeds received from NCM for the modification~~repurchase of ~~our Exhibitor Services Agreement with NCM. See Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion~~approximately $419.4 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of ~~the NCM Transaction.~~

~~Since the issuance of the~~Cinemark, Inc.’s 9³/4% senior discount notes, which included the payment of $158.3 million of interest that had accreted on ~~March 31, 2004, interest has accreted rather than been paid in cash, which has benefited our operating cash flows for~~ the ~~periods presented. Interest will be paid in cash commencing September 15, 2009, at which time our operating cash flows will be impacted by these cash payments.~~senior discount notes since issuance during 2004. The principal portion of the repurchase is reflected as a financing activity.

Investing Activities

Our investing activities have been principally related to the development and acquisition of additional theatres. New theatre openings and acquisitions historically have been financed with internally generated cash and by debt financing, including borrowings under our senior secured credit facility. Cash provided by (used for) investing activities amounted to ~~$(81.6)~~$93.2 million, ~~$(631.7)~~$(94.9) million and ~~$93.2~~$(183.1) million for the years ended December 31, ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 and ~~2007,~~2009, respectively. The increase in cash used for investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2006 is primarily due to the cash portion of the Century Acquisition purchase price (see Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements) and increased capital expenditures. The increase in cash provided by investing activities forFor the year ended December 31, 2007, ~~is primarily due~~$214.8 million of the cash provided by investing activities related to the proceeds received from NCM for the sale of a portion of our equity investment in NCM in conjunction with NCM Inc.’s initial public ~~offering and the sale of our investment in stock of Fandango, Inc., partially offset by increased capital expenditures.~~offering. See ~~Notes~~Note 7 ~~and 9~~ to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the NCM ~~Transaction~~Transaction. For the year ended December 31, 2009, the increase in cash used for investing activities is primarily due to the acquisition of four theatres in the U.S. for approximately $49.0 million (see Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements), the acquisition of one theatre in Brazil for approximately $9.1 million and ~~the Fandango Transaction, respectively.~~increased capital expenditures.

Capital expenditures for the years ended December 31, ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 and ~~2007~~2009 were as follows (in millions):

New Existing
Period Theatres Theatres Total
Year Ended December 31, 2005 $ 50.3 $ 25.3 $ 75.6
Year Ended December 31, 2006 $ 68.8 $ 38.3 $ 107.1
Year Ended December 31, 2007 $ 113.3 $ 33.0 $ 146.3

During October 2006, we completed the Century Acquisition for a purchase price of approximately $681.2 million and the assumption of approximately $360.0 million of debt of Century. Of the total purchase price, $150.0 million consisted of the issuance of shares of Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s common stock. We also incurred approximately $7.4 million in transaction costs. See Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion of this acquisition.


	New		Existing
Period	Theatres		Theatres		Total
Year Ended December 31, 2007	$	113.3	$	33.0	$	146.3
Year Ended December 31, 2008	$	69.9	$	36.2	$	106.1
Year Ended December 31, 2009	$	36.5	$	88.3	$	124.8

We continue to expand our U.S. theatre circuit. ~~During~~We acquired four theatres with 82 screens, built four theatres with 54 screens, and closed seven theatres with 48 screens during the year ended December 31, ~~2007, we opened 13 new theatres with 201 screens, closed five theatres with 36 screens and sold two theatres with 34 screens.~~2009. At December 31,

We also continue to expand our international theatre circuit. We ~~opened seven~~acquired one theatre with 15 screens, built five new theatres with 5629 screens and closed ~~one theatre with ten~~three theatres and 19 screens during the year ended December 31, ~~2007, bringing our total international screen count to 1,011 screens.~~2009. At December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, we had signed commitments to open ~~three~~seven new ~~theatres~~theatre with 1953 screens in international markets during ~~2008.~~2010. We estimate the remaining capital expenditures for the development of these 1953 international screens will be approximately ~~$10.8~~$24 million. Actual expenditures for continued theatre development and acquisitions are subject to change based upon the availability of attractive opportunities.

We plan to fund capital expenditures for our continued development with cash flow from operations, borrowings under our senior secured credit facility, ~~subordinated note borrowings,~~from debt issuances, proceeds from sale leaseback transactions and/or sales of excess real estate.

During June 2007, we invested $1.5 million in a joint venture with AMC and Regal called Digital Cinema Implementation Partners LLC (“DCIP”). We are accounting for our investment in DCIP under the equity method of accounting. See Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements.

Financing Activities

Cash provided by (used for) financing activities was ~~$(3.8)~~$(183.7) million, ~~$440.0~~$(135.1) million and ~~$(183.7)~~$78.3 million during the years ended December 31, ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 and ~~2007,~~2009, respectively. The increase in cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2006 was primarily due to the cash received under our senior secured credit facility partially offset by the pay-off of long-term debt assumed in the Century Acquisition and the pay-off of our former senior secured credit facility. The increase in cash used for financing activities forFor the year ended December 31, 2007, ~~was~~cash used for financing activities primarily ~~due to~~consisted of the repurchase of $332.1 million aggregate principal amount of ~~our~~Cinemark USA, Inc.’s 9% senior subordinated notes, ~~and~~the repurchase of $69.2 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of ~~our~~Cinemark, Inc.’s 9³/4% senior discount notes for approximately $43.1 million, and $33.1 million of dividends paid to our stockholders, which were partially offset by the net proceeds from our initial public offering of approximately $245.9 million.

~~In August 2007, we initiated a quarterly dividend policy. Consistent with~~ For the ~~disclosures in our 424(b)(1) prospectus, the dividend~~year ended December 31, 2008, cash used for the second quarter of 2007 was based on a dividend rate of $0.18 per share of common stock, prorated based on the April 27, 2007 closing of our initial public offering. Based on such proration, our board of directors declared a cash dividend for the second quarter of 2007 of $0.13 per share of common stock payable to stockholders of record on September 4, 2007, which was paid with available cash on September 18, 2007. The dividend for the third quarter was the first dividend paid by us reflecting a full quarter since our initial public offering and was paid in the amount of $0.18 per share of common stock on December 18, 2007. We paid dividends of approximately $33.1 million in the aggregate during 2007. The dividend for the fourth quarter of 2007 was paid in the amount of $0.18 per share of common stock on March 14, 2008.

On March 6, 2007, we commenced an offer to purchase for cash, on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in an Offer to Purchase and Consent Solicitation Statement, any and all of our 9% senior subordinated notes, of which $332.2 million aggregate principal amount remained outstanding. In connection with the tender offer, we solicited consents for certain proposed amendments to the indenture to remove substantially all restrictive covenants and certain events of default provisions. On March 20, 2007, the early settlement date, approximately $332.0 million aggregate principal amountfinancing activities primarily consisted of the ~~9% senior subordinated notes were tendered and repurchased by us for~~repurchase of approximately $360.2 million including accrued interest and premiums paid. We funded the repurchase with the net proceeds received from the NCM Transaction (see Note 7). On March 20, 2007, we and the Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee to the Indenture dated February 11, 2003, executed the Fourth Supplemental Indenture. The Fourth Supplemental Indenture became effective on March 20, 2007 and it amends the Indenture by eliminating substantially all restrictive covenants and certain events of default provisions. On April 3, 2007, we repurchased an additional $0.1 million aggregate principal amount of the 9% senior subordinated notes tendered after the early settlement date.

On April 24, 2007, we completed our initial public offering. We sold 13,888,889 shares of our common stock and selling stockholders sold an additional 14,111,111 shares of common stock at a price of $17.955 ($19 per share less underwriting discounts). The net proceeds (before expenses) we received were $249.4 million and we paid approximately $3.5 million in legal, accounting and other fees. The selling stockholders granted the underwriters a 30-day option to

purchase up to an additional 2,800,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $17.955 ($19 per share less underwriting discounts). On May 21, 2007, the underwriters purchased an additional 269,100 shares from the selling stockholders pursuant to this option. We did not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling stockholders. We have utilized a portion of the net proceeds to repurchase a portion of our 9³/4~~% senior discount notes and we expect to continue to use the remaining net proceeds from the offering to repurchase a portion of the remaining outstanding 9~~³/4~~% senior discount notes or repay debt outstanding under the senior secured credit facility. The 9~~³/4~~% senior discount notes are not currently subject to repurchase at our option. Accordingly, if we are unable to repurchase the 9~~³/4% senior discount notes at acceptable prices, we expect to use the net proceeds to repay term loan debt outstanding under the senior secured credit facility. We have significant flexibility in applying the net proceeds from our initial public offering. We have invested the proceeds in short-term, investment-grade marketable securities or money market obligations.

~~During July and August 2007, we repurchased in six open market purchases a total of~~ $47.0 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of ~~our~~Cinemark, Inc.’s 9³/4% senior discount notes for approximately ~~$42.8 million, including accreted interest of $10.9~~$29.6 million, and a$77.5 million of dividends paid to our stockholders. For the year ended December 31, 2009, cash ~~premium~~provided by financing activities includes the net proceeds of ~~$2.5 million. During November 2007, we repurchased in one open market purchase $22.2~~$458.5 million from the issuance of Cinemark USA, Inc.’s $470 million 8.625% senior notes, partially offset by $78.6 million of dividends paid to our stockholders and $261.1 million used for the repurchase of approximately $419.4 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of ~~our~~Cinemark, Inc.’s 9³/4% senior discount ~~notes for approximately $20.9 million, including~~notes. The accreted interest portion of ~~$5.7~~the repurchase of $158.3 million ~~and~~is reflected as an operating activity.

Below is a ~~cash premium~~summary of $1.5 million. We funded the transactions with proceeds from our initial public offering. As of December 31, 2007, we had outstanding approximately $466.4 million aggregate principal amount at maturitydividends paid since initiation of our 9³/4~~% senior discount notes.~~dividend policy in August 2007:

Date

Date of

Date

Amount per

Total

Declared

Record

Paid

Common Share ⁽¹⁾

Dividends

08/13/07

09/04/07

09/18/07

0.13

$13.9 million

11/12/07

12/03/07

12/18/07

0.18

$19.2 million

02/26/08

03/06/08

03/14/08

0.18

$19.3 million

05/09/08

05/30/08

06/12/08

0.18

$19.3 million

08/07/08

08/25/08

09/12/08

0.18

$19.3 million

11/06/08

11/26/08

12/11/08

0.18

$19.6 million

02/13/09

03/05/09

03/20/09

0.18

$19.6 million

05/13/09

06/02/09

06/18/09

0.18

$19.7 million

07/29/09

08/17/09

09/01/09

0.18

$19.7 million

11/04/09

11/25/09

12/10/09

0.18

$19.7 million


⁽¹⁾		The dividend paid on September 18, 2007 was based on a quarterly dividend rate of $0.18 per common share, prorated based on the April 24, 2007 closing date of our initial public offering.

basis for the most recently ended four full fiscal quarters for which internal financial statements are available, using certain assumptions and modifications specified in the indenture, and including the additional indebtedness then being incurred) falling below two to one (the “senior notes debt incurrence ratio test”); and (3) the aggregate amount of distributions made since March 31, 2004, including the distribution proposed, is less than the sum of (a) half of its consolidated net income (as defined in the indenture) since February 11, 2003, (b) the net proceeds to it from the issuance of stock since April 2, 2004, and (c) certain other amounts specified in the indenture, subject to certain adjustments specified in the indenture. The dividend restriction is subject to certain exceptions specified in the indenture.

~~Upon certain specified types of change of control of Cinemark, Inc., Cinemark, Inc. would be required under the indenture to make an offer to repurchase all of the 9~~³/4~~% senior discount notes at a price equal to 101% of the accreted value of the notes plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, through the date of repurchase.~~

Senior Secured Credit Facility

On October 5, 2006, in connection with the Century Acquisition, Cinemark USA, Inc., entered into a senior secured credit facility. The senior secured credit facility provides for a seven year term loan of $1.12 billion and a $150 million revolving credit line that matures in six years unless Cinemark USA, Inc.’s 9% senior subordinated notes have not been refinanced by August 1, 2012 with indebtedness that matures no earlier than seven and one-half years after the closing date of the senior secured credit facility, in which case the maturity date of the revolving credit line becomes August 1, 2012. The net proceeds of the term loan were used to finance a portion of the $531.2 million cash portion of the Century Acquisition, repay in full the $253.5 million outstanding under the former senior secured credit facility, repay approximately $360.0 million of existing indebtedness of Century and to pay for related fees and expenses. The revolving credit line was left undrawn at closing. The revolving credit line is used for general corporate purposes.

At December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, there was ~~$1,101.7~~$1,083.6 million outstanding under the term loan and no borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit line. ~~Approximately $149.9~~Cinemark USA, Inc. had $150.0 million ~~was~~in available ~~for~~ borrowing capacity under ~~the~~its revolving credit ~~line, giving effect to a $0.1 million letter of credit outstanding.~~facility. The average interest rate on outstanding term loan borrowings under the senior secured credit facility at December 31, ~~2007~~2009 was ~~6.7%~~3.1% per annum.

Under the term loan, principal payments of $2.8 million are due each calendar quarter ~~beginning December 1, 2006~~ through September 30, 2012 and increase to $263.2 million each calendar quarter from December 31, 2012 to maturity at October 5, 2013. Prior to the amendment to the senior secured credit facility discussed below, the term loan accrued interest, at Cinemark USA, Inc.’s option, at: (A) the base rate equal to the higher of (1) the prime lending rate as set forth on the British Banking Association Telerate page 5 or (2) the federal funds effective rate from time to time plus 0.50%, plus a margin that ranges from 0.75% to 1.00% per annum, or (B) a “eurodollar rate” plus a margin that ranges from 1.75% to 2.00% per annum, in each case as adjusted pursuant to Cinemark USA, Inc.’s corporate credit rating. Borrowings under the revolving credit line bear interest, at Cinemark USA, Inc.’s option, at: (A) a base rate equal to the higher of (1) the prime lending rate as set forth on the British Banking Association Telerate page 5 and (2) the federal funds effective rate from time to time plus 0.50%, plus a margin that ranges from 0.50% to 1.00% per annum, or (B) a “eurodollar rate” plus a margin that ranges from 1.50% to 2.00% per annum, in each case as adjusted pursuant to Cinemark USA, Inc.’s consolidated net senior secured leverage ratio as defined in the credit agreement. Cinemark USA, Inc. is required to pay a commitment fee calculated at the rate of 0.50% per annum on the average daily unused portion of the new revolving credit line, payable quarterly in arrears, which ~~rate~~ decreases to 0.375% per annum for any fiscal quarter in which Cinemark USA, Inc.’s consolidated net senior secured leverage ratio on the last day of such fiscal quarter is less than 2.25 to 1.0.

On March 14, 2007, Cinemark USA, Inc. amended its senior secured credit facility to, among other things, modify the interest rate on the term loans under the senior secured credit facility, modify certain prepayment terms and covenants, and facilitate the tender offer for the 9% senior subordinated notes. The term ~~loans~~loan now ~~accrue~~accrues interest, at Cinemark USA, Inc.’s option, at: (A) the base rate equal to the higher of (1) the prime lending rate as set forth on the British Banking Association Telerate page 5, or (2) the federal funds effective rate from time to time plus 0.50%, plus a margin that ranges from 0.50% to 0.75% per annum, or (B) a “eurodollar rate” plus a margin that ranges from 1.50% to 1.75%, per annum. In each case, the margin is a function of the corporate credit rating applicable to the borrower. The interest rate on the revolving credit line was not amended. Additionally, the amendment removed any obligation to prepay amounts outstanding under the senior secured credit facility in an amount equal to the amount of the net cash proceeds received from the NCM Transaction or from excess cash flows, and imposed a 1% prepayment premium for one year on certain prepayments of the term loans.

Cinemark USA, Inc.’s obligations under the senior secured credit facility are guaranteed by Cinemark Holdings, ~~Inc., Cinemark, Inc., CNMK Holding,~~ Inc., and certain of Cinemark USA, Inc.’s domestic subsidiaries and are secured by mortgages on certain fee and leasehold properties and security interests in substantially all of Cinemark USA, Inc.’s and the guarantors’ personal property, including, without limitation, pledges of all of Cinemark USA, Inc.’s capital stock, all of the capital stock of ~~Cinemark, Inc., CNMK Holding, Inc. and~~ certain of Cinemark USA, Inc.’s domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the voting stock of certain of its foreign subsidiaries.

The senior secured credit facility contains usual and customary negative covenants for agreements of this type, including, but not limited to, restrictions on Cinemark USA, Inc.’s ability, and in certain instances, its subsidiaries’ and Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s ~~Cinemark, Inc.’s and CNMK Holding, Inc.’s~~ ability, to consolidate or merge or ~~liquidate,~~liquidate; wind up or dissolve; substantially change the nature of its business; sell, transfer or dispose of assets; create or incur indebtedness; create liens; pay dividends and repurchase ~~stock and voluntarily repurchase or redeem the 9~~³/4~~% senior discount notes;~~stock; and make capital expenditures and investments. The senior secured credit facility also requires Cinemark USA, Inc. to satisfy a consolidated net senior secured leverage ratio covenant as determined in accordance with the senior secured credit facility.

The dividend restriction contained in the senior secured credit facility prevents us and any of our subsidiaries from paying a dividend or otherwise distributing cash to its stockholders unless (1) we are not in default, and the distribution would not cause us to be in default, under the senior secured credit facility; and (2) the aggregate amount of certain dividends, distributions, investments, redemptions and capital expenditures made since October 5, 2006, including dividends declared by the ~~distribution currently proposed,~~board of directors, is less than the sum of (a) the aggregate amount of cash and cash equivalents received by Cinemark Holdings, Inc. or Cinemark USA, Inc. as common equity since October 5, 2006, (b) Cinemark USA, Inc.’s consolidated EBITDA minus 1.75 times its consolidated interest expense, each as defined in the senior secured credit facility, since October 1, 2006, (c) $150 million and (d) certain other amounts specified in the senior secured credit facility, subject to certain adjustments specified in the senior secured credit facility. The dividend restriction is subject to certain exceptions specified in the senior secured credit facility.

The senior secured credit facility also includes customary events of default, including, among other things, payment default, covenant default, breach of representation or warranty, bankruptcy, cross-default, material ERISA events, certain types of change of control, material money judgments and failure to maintain subsidiary guarantees. If an event of default occurs, all commitments under the senior secured credit facility may be terminated and all obligations under the senior secured credit facility could be accelerated by the lenders, causing all loans outstanding (including accrued interest and fees payable thereunder) to be declared immediately due and payable.

~~During March 2007, we entered into two~~See discussion of interest rate swap agreements under Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Cinemark USA, Inc. 8⁵/8% Senior Notes

On June 29, 2009, Cinemark USA, Inc. issued $470.0 million aggregate principal amount of 8.625% senior notes due 2019 with ~~effective dates~~an original issue discount of ~~August 13, 2007~~approximately $11.5 million, resulting in proceeds of approximately $458.5 million. The proceeds were primarily used to fund the repurchase of Cinemark, Inc.’s 9³/4% senior discount notes discussed below. Interest is payable on June 15 and ~~terms~~December 15 of ~~five years each.~~each year beginning on December 15, 2009. The ~~interest rate swaps were designated to hedge approximately $500.0 million~~senior notes mature on June 15, 2019.

The senior notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several senior unsecured basis by certain of our ~~variable rate debt obligations. Under~~subsidiaries that guarantee, assume or become liable with respect to any of our or our guarantor’s debt. The senior notes and the ~~terms~~guarantees are senior unsecured obligations and rank equally in right of ~~the interest rate swap agreements, we pay fixed rates~~payment with all of ~~4.918%~~our and ~~4.922% on $375.0 million~~our guarantor’s existing and ~~$125.0 million, respectively, of variable rate~~future senior unsecured debt and ~~receive interest at a variable rate based on~~senior in right of payment to all of our and our guarantor’s existing and future subordinated debt. The senior notes and the ~~3-month LIBOR. The 3-month LIBOR rate on each reset date determines the variable portion~~guarantees are effectively subordinated to all of ~~the interest rate-swaps for the three-month period following the reset date. No premium or discount was incurred upon us entering into the interest rate swaps because the pay~~our and receive rates on the interest rate swaps represented prevailing rates for each counterparty at the time the interest rate swaps were consummated. The interest rate swaps qualify for cash flow hedge accounting treatment in accordance with SFAS No. 133,~~“Accounting for Derivative Instruments~~our guarantor’s existing and ~~Hedging Activities~~~~,” and as such, we have effectively hedged our exposure to variability in the~~ future ~~cash flows attributable~~secured debt to the ~~3-month LIBOR on $500.0 million~~extent of ~~variable rate debt. The change in~~ the ~~fair~~ value of the assets securing such debt, including all borrowings under our senior secured credit facility. The senior notes and the guarantees are structurally subordinated to all existing and future debt and other liabilities of our subsidiaries that do not guarantee the senior notes.

Prior to June 15, 2014, Cinemark USA, Inc. may redeem all or ~~liability~~any part of the senior notes at its option at 100% of the principal amount plus a make-whole premium. After June 15, 2014, Cinemark USA, Inc. may redeem the senior notes in whole or in part at redemption prices described in the senior notes. In addition, Cinemark USA, Inc. may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the senior notes from the net proceeds of certain equity offerings at the redemption price set forth in the senior notes.

We filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (or the Commission) on September 24, 2009 pursuant to which we offered to exchange the senior notes for substantially similar registered senior notes. The registration statement became effective ~~portion~~on December 17, 2009. The exchanged registered senior notes do not have transfer restrictions.

Cinemark, Inc. 9³/4% Senior Discount Notes

On March 31, 2004, Cinemark, Inc. issued $577.2 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of 9³/4% senior discount notes due 2014. Interest on the notes accreted until March 15, 2009 up to their aggregate principal amount. Subsequently, cash interest accrued and was payable semi-annually in arrears on March 15 and September 15, commencing on September 15, 2009.

Prior to 2007, Cinemark, Inc. repurchased on the open market a total of $41.6 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of its 9³/4% senior discount notes for approximately $33.0 million, including accreted interest of $5.6 million and cash premiums of $1.4 million. Cinemark, Inc. funded these transactions with cash from operations.

During 2007, in six open market purchases, Cinemark, Inc. repurchased $69.2 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of its 9³/4% senior discount notes for approximately $63.7 million, including accreted interest of $16.6 million and cash premiums of $4.0 million. Cinemark, Inc. funded these transactions with proceeds from our initial public offering of common stock.

During 2008, in ten open market purchases, Cinemark, Inc. repurchased $47.0 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of our 9³/4% senior discount notes for approximately $42.2 million, including accreted interest of $15.2 million and a discount of $2.6 million. Cinemark, Inc. funded these transactions with proceeds from our initial public offering of common stock.

On June 15, 2009, Cinemark, Inc. commenced a cash tender offer for any and all of its 9³/4% senior discount notes due 2014, of which $419.4 million aggregate principal amount at maturity remained outstanding. In connection with the tender offer, Cinemark, Inc. solicited consents to adopt proposed amendments to the indenture to eliminate substantially all restrictive covenants and certain events of default provisions. On June 29, 2009, approximately $402.5 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of the 9³/4% senior discount notes were tendered and repurchased by us for approximately $433.4 million, including accreted interest ~~rate swaps’ gains or losses reported~~of $152.0 million, accrued interest of $11.3 million and tender premiums paid of $19.6 million. We funded the repurchase with the proceeds from the issuance of the Cinemark USA, Inc. 8.625% senior notes discussed above.

Effective as ~~a component~~ of ~~other comprehensive income~~June 29, 2009, Cinemark, Inc. and the ~~ineffective portion reported in earnings. At December~~Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. as trustee to the indenture dated March 31, ~~2007,~~2004, executed the ~~estimated~~First Supplemental Indenture to amend the Indenture by eliminating substantially all restrictive covenants and certain events of default provisions.

On August 3, 2009, we delivered to the Bank of New York Trust Company N.A., as trustee, a notice to redeem the $16.9 million aggregate ~~fair value~~principal amount at maturity of our 9³/4% senior discount notes remaining outstanding. The senior discount notes were redeemed on September 8, 2009, at which time we paid approximately $18.6 million, consisting of a redemption price of 104.875% of the face amount of the discount notes remaining outstanding (resulting in a call premium of $0.8 million), which included $6.4 million of accreted interest, ~~rate swaps was a liability~~plus accrued and unpaid interest of ~~approximately $18.4 million.~~$0.8 million to, but not including, the redemption date. We used proceeds from the issuance of Cinemark USA, Inc.’s senior notes to fund the repurchase.

Cinemark USA, Inc. 9% Senior Subordinated Notes

On February 11, 2003, Cinemark USA, Inc. issued $150 million aggregate principal amount of 9% senior subordinated notes due 2013 and on May 7, 2003, Cinemark USA, Inc. issued an additional $210 million aggregate principal amount of 9% senior subordinated notes due 2013, collectively referred to as the 9% senior subordinated notes. Interest is payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year.

subordinated notes at a purchase price of 101% of the aggregate principal amount. Approximately $17.8 million aggregate principal amount of the 9% senior subordinated notes were tendered. The payment of the change of control price was funded with available cash by Cinemark USA, Inc. on June 1, 2004.

~~During May 2006, as part of three open market purchases,~~2007, Cinemark USA, Inc. repurchased ~~$10.0~~approximately $27.8 million aggregate principal amount of its 9% senior subordinated ~~notes for approximately $11.0 million, including accrued and unpaid interest.~~notes. The ~~transactions were~~transaction was funded ~~by Cinemark USA, Inc.~~ with available cash from its operations.

On March 6, 2007, Cinemark USA, Inc. commenced an offer to purchase for cash any and all of its then outstanding $332.2 million aggregate principal amount of 9% senior subordinated notes. In connection with the tender offer, Cinemark USA, Inc. solicited consents for certain proposed amendments to the indenture under which such notes were issued to remove substantially all restrictive covenants and certain events of default provisions. On March 20, 2007, the early settlement date, Cinemark USA, Inc. repurchased $332.0 million aggregate principal amount of 9% senior subordinated notes and executed a supplemental indenture ~~removing substantially all of~~implementing the ~~restrictive covenants and certain events of default.~~proposed amendments. Cinemark USA, Inc. used the proceeds from the NCM Transaction and cash on hand to purchase the 9% senior subordinated notes tendered pursuant to the tender offer and consent solicitation. On March 20, 2007, we and the Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee to the Indenture dated February 11, 2003, executed the Fourth Supplemental Indenture. The Fourth Supplemental Indenture became effective on March 20, 2007 and it amends the Indenture by eliminating substantially all restrictive covenants and certain events of default provisions. On April 3, 2007, Cinemark USA, Inc. repurchased an additional $0.1 million aggregate principal amount of the 9% senior subordinated notes tendered after the early settlement date.

As of December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, Cinemark USA, Inc. had outstanding approximately $0.2 million aggregate principal amount of 9% senior subordinated notes. Cinemark USA, Inc. may redeem the remaining 9% senior subordinated notes ~~on or after February 1, 2008.~~at its option at any time.

~~Former Senior Secured Credit Facility~~

On April 2, 2004, Cinemark USA, Inc. amended its then existing senior secured credit facility in connection with the MDP Merger. The former senior secured credit facility provided for a $260 million seven year term loan and a $100 million six and one-half year revolving credit line. The net proceeds from the former senior secured credit facility were used to repay the term loan under its then existing senior secured credit facility of approximately $163.8 million and to redeem the approximately $94.2 million aggregate principal amount of its then outstanding $105.0 million aggregate principal amount 8 1/2% senior subordinated notes due 2008 that were tendered pursuant to the tender offer.

On October 5, 2006, in connection with the Century Acquisition, the $253.5 million outstanding under the former senior secured credit facility was repaid in full with a portion of the proceeds from the senior secured credit facility.

Covenant Compliance

The indenture to the senior notes contains covenants that limit, among other things, the ability of Cinemark USA, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries to (1) consummate specified asset sales, (2) make investments or other restricted payments, including paying dividends, making other distributions or repurchasing subordinated debt or equity, (3) incur additional indebtedness and issue preferred stock, (4) enter into transactions with affiliates, (5) enter new lines of business, (6) merge or consolidate with, or sell all or substantially all of its assets to another person and (7) create liens. Upon a change of control of Cinemark Holdings, Inc. or Cinemark USA, Inc., Cinemark USA, Inc. would be required to make an offer to repurchase the senior notes at a price equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount outstanding plus accrued and unpaid interest through the date of repurchase. Certain asset dispositions are considered triggering events that may require Cinemark USA, Inc. to use the proceeds from those asset dispositions to make an offer to purchase the notes at 100% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of repurchase if such proceeds are not otherwise used within 365 days as described in the indenture. The indenture governing the 9³/4% senior ~~discount~~ notes ~~requires us to have a fixed charge coverage ratio (as determined under the indenture) of at least 2.0 to 1.0 in order~~allows Cinemark USA, Inc. to incur additional indebtedness ~~issue preferred stock or make~~if we satisfy the coverage ratio specified in the indenture, after giving effect to the incurrence of the additional indebtedness, and in certain ~~restricted payments, including dividends to our parent. Fixed charge~~other circumstances. The required minimum coverage ratio is ~~defined~~2 to 1 and our actual ratio as the ratio of our consolidated cash flow to our fixed charges for the four most recent fiscal quarters, giving pro forma effect to certain events as specified in the indenture. Fixed charges is defined as our consolidated interest expense, subject to certain adjustments as provided in the indenture. Consolidated cash flow as defined in the indenture is substantially consistent with our presentation of Adjusted EBITDA below. Because our failure to meet the fixed charge coverage ratio described above could restrict our ability to incur debt or make dividend payments, management believes that the indenture governing the 9³/4~~% senior discount notes and these covenants and Adjusted EBITDA are material to us. As~~ of December 31, ~~2007, fixed charge coverage ratio under the indenture~~2009 was ~~in excess of the 2.0~~5.4 to ~~1.0 requirement described above.~~1.

Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin should not be construed as alternatives to net income or operating income as indicators of operating performance or as alternatives to cash flow provided by operating activities as measures of liquidity (as determined in accordance with GAAP). Furthermore, Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

~~The following table sets forth a reconciliation of net income (loss) to Adjusted EBITDA.~~

Year ended Year ended Year ended
December 31, December 31, December 31,
2005 2006 2007
(In thousands)
Net Income (loss) $ (25,408 ) $ 841 $ 88,920
Add (deduct):
Income taxes 9,408 12,685 111,962
Interest expense⁽¹⁾
84,082 109,328 145,596
Gain on NCM Transaction — — (210,773 )
Gain on Fandango transaction — — (9,205 )
Loss on early retirement of debt 46 8,283 13,456
Other income (4,627 ) (3,768 ) (15,497 )
Termination of profit participation agreement — — 6,952
Depreciation and amortization 81,952 95,821 148,781
Amortization of net favorable leases 4,174 3,649 2,935
Impairment of long-lived assets 51,677 28,537 86,558
(Gain) loss on sale of assets and other 4,436 7,645 (2,953 )
Deferred lease expenses 3,137 4,717 5,979
Amortization of long-term prepaid rents 1,258 1,013 1,146
Share based awards compensation expense — 2,864 3,081

Adjusted EBITDA $ 210,135 $ 271,615 $ 376,938


⁽¹⁾		~~Includes amortization of debt issue costs.~~

As of December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, we are in full compliance with all agreements, including all related covenants, governing our outstanding debt.

Ratings

We are rated by nationally recognized rating agencies. The significance of individual ratings varies from agency to agency. However, companies’ assigned ratings at the top end of the range have, in the opinion of certain rating agencies, the strongest capacity for repayment of debt or payment of claims, while companies at the bottom end of the range have the weakest capability. Ratings are always subject to change and there can be no assurance that our current ratings will continue for any given period of time. A downgrade of our debt ratings, depending on the extent, could increase the cost to borrow funds. Below are our latest ratings per category, which were current as of February ~~29, 2008.~~28, 2010.


					~~Standard and~~
Category	Moody’s		Standard and Poor’s
Cinemark USA, Inc. 9³/4%8.625% Senior ~~Discount~~ Notes		B3			~~CCC+~~B-
Cinemark USA, Inc. Senior Secured Credit Facility	Ba3			B

New Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ~~SFAS~~Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157 (FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820),“Fair Value Measurements.”Among other requirements, this statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The statement applies whenever other statements require or permit assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. SFAS No. 157 is(FASB ASC Topic 820) was effective for us beginning January 1, 2008 (January 1, 2009 for nonfinancial assets and liabilities). Adoption of this statement isdid not ~~expected to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.~~

~~In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,~~~~“The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”.~~~~This statement provides companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair~~

value that are not required to be measured at fair value. SFAS No. 159 establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. We have not elected to measure eligible items at fair value upon initial adoption. SFAS No. 159 is effective for us beginning January 1, 2009. Adoption of this statement is not expected to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R) (FASB ASC Topic 805), “Business Combinations”. This statement requires all business combinations completed after the effective date to be accounted for by applying the acquisition method (previously referred to as the purchase method); expands the definition of transactions and events that qualify as business combinations; requires that the acquired assets and liabilities, including contingencies, be recorded at the fair value determined on the acquisition date and changes thereafter reflected in income, not goodwill; changes the recognition timing for restructuring costs; and requires acquisition costs to be expensed as ~~incurred.~~incurred rather than capitalized as part of the cost of the acquisition. Adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) (FASB ASC Topic 805) is required for business combinations that occur after December 15, 2008. Early adoption and retroactive application of SFAS No. 141(R) (FASB ASC Topic 805) to fiscal years preceding the effective date is not permitted. ~~We are evaluating the adoption~~Adoption of ~~SFAS No. 141(R) and its~~this statement did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160 (FASB ASC Topic 810), “Noncontrolling Interest in Consolidated Financial Statements”. This statement establishes new accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Specifically, this statement requires the recognition of a noncontrolling interest (minority interest) as equity in the consolidated financial statements and separate from the parent’s equity. The amount of net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest will no longer be shown as a expense item for all periods presented, but will be included in consolidated net income on the face of the income statement. SFAS No. 160 (FASB ASC Topic 810) requires disclosure, on the face of the consolidated income statement, of the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling interest. SFAS No. 160 (FASB ASC Topic 810) clarifies that changes in a parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation are equity transactions if the parent retains its controlling financial interest. In addition, this statement requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. Such gain or loss will be measured using the fair value of the noncontrolling equity investment on the deconsolidation date. SFAS No. 160 (FASB ASC Topic 810) also includes expanded disclosure requirements regarding the interests of the parent and its noncontrolling interest. SFAS No. 160 is(FASB ASC Topic 810) was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. ~~Earlier~~Upon adoption ~~is prohibited. We are evaluating~~of this statement, we have recognized our noncontrolling interests as equity in the consolidated balance sheets, have reflected net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated net income (loss) in the statements of operations and have provided a summary of changes in equity and a summary of comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Cinemark Holdings, Inc., our noncontrolling interests and in total in the statement of stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss) for all periods presented.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161 (FASB ASC Topic 815) “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133”. This statement intends to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures about their impact on an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 (FASB ASC Topic 815) requires disclosures regarding the objectives for using derivative instruments, the fair values of derivative instruments and their related gains and losses, and the accounting for derivatives and related hedged items. SFAS No. 161 (FASB ASC Topic 815) was effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of SFAS No. ~~160~~161 (FASB ASC Topic 815) did not impact our consolidated financial statements, and ~~its~~did not have a significant impact on our disclosures.

In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position Emerging Issues Task Force FSP-EITF 03-6-1 (FASB ASC Topic 260),“Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities”. Under FSP-EITF 03-6-1 (FASB ASC Topic 260), unvested share based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. FSP-EITF 03-6-1 (FASB ASC Topic 260) was effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years and requires retrospective application. The adoption of FSP-EITF 03-6-1(FASB ASC Topic 260) did not have a significant impact on our earnings per share calculations.

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165 (FASB ASC Topic 855),“Subsequent Events”. SFAS No. 165 (FASB ASC Topic 855) should not result in significant changes in the subsequent events that an entity reports. Rather, SFAS No. 165 (FASB ASC Topic 855) introduces the concept of financial statements that are available to be issued. Financial statements are considered available to be issued when they are complete in a form and format that complies with generally accepted accounting principles and all approvals necessary for issuance have been obtained. SFAS No. 165 (FASB ASC Topic 855) was effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 165 (FASB ASC Topic 855) did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168 (FASB ASC Topic 105),“The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”, which authorizes the Codification as the sole source for authoritative generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. (“U.S. GAAP”). SFAS No. 168 (FASB ASC Topic 105) was effective for financial statements issued for reporting periods that ended after September 15, 2009. SFAS No. 168 (FASB ASC Topic 105) supersedes all accounting standards in U.S. GAAP, aside from those issued by the SEC. SFAS No. 168 (FASB ASC Topic 105) replaced SFAS No. 162 to establish a new hierarchy of GAAP sources for non-governmental entities under the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The adoption of SFAS No. 168 (FASB ASC Topic 105) did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Seasonality

Our revenues have historically been seasonal, coinciding with the timing of releases of motion pictures by the major distributors. Generally, the most successful motion pictures have been released during the summer, extending from May to mid-August, and during the holiday season, extending from ~~Thanksgiving~~early November through year-end. The unexpected emergence of a hit film during other periods can alter this seasonality trend. The timing of such film releases can have a significant effect on our results of operations, and the results of one quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for the next quarter or for the same period in the following year.

~~Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk~~


Item 7A.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We have exposure to financial market risks, including changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and other relevant market prices.

Interest Rate Risk

We are currently party to variable rate debt facilities. An increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest ~~costs~~expense relating to our variable rate debt facilities. At December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, there was an aggregate of approximately ~~$607.8~~$784.6 million of variable rate debt outstanding under these facilities, ~~(net of $500.0~~which excludes $300.0 million of ~~debt subject to~~Cinemark USA, Inc.’s term loan that is hedged with the Company’s interest rate ~~swaps~~swap agreements as discussed ~~below).~~below. Based on the interest ~~rate levels~~rates in effect on the variable rate debt outstanding at December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, a 100 basis point increase in market interest rates would increase our annual interest expense by approximately ~~$6.1~~$7.8 million.

During 2007 and 2008, we entered into three interest rate swap agreements. The interest rate swap agreements qualify for cash flow hedge accounting. The fair values of the interest rate swaps are recorded on our consolidated balance sheet as an asset or liability with the effective portion of the interest rate swaps’ gains or losses reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and the ineffective portion reported in earnings.

In March 2007, we entered into two interest rate swap agreements with effective dates of August 13, 2007 and terms of five years each. The interest rate swaps were designated to hedge approximately $500.0 million of our variable rate debt ~~obligations.~~obligations under our senior secured credit facility. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreements, we pay fixed rates of 4.918% and 4.922% on $375.0 million and $125.0 million, respectively, of variable rate debt and receive interest at a variable rate based on the 3-month LIBOR. The 3-month LIBOR rate on each reset date determines the variable portion of the interest rate-swaps for

the three-month period following the reset date. No premium or discount was incurred upon us entering into the interest rate swaps because the pay and receive rates on the interest rate swaps represented prevailing rates for each counterparty at the time the interest rate swaps were consummated.

On September 14, 2008, the counterparty to our $375.0 million interest rate swap agreement filed for bankruptcy protection. As a result, we determined that on September 15, 2008, when the counterparty’s credit rating was downgraded, the interest rate swap was no longer highly effective. On October 1, 2008, we terminated this interest rate swap.

During October 2008, we entered into one interest rate swap agreement with an effective date of November 14, 2008 and a term of four years. The interest rate ~~swaps qualify~~swap was designated to hedge approximately $100.0 million of our variable rate debt obligations under our senior secured credit facility for ~~cash flow hedge accounting treatment in accordance with SFAS No. 133,~~~~“Accounting~~three years and $75.0 million of our variable rate debt obligations under our senior secured credit facility for ~~Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities~~~~,” and as such,~~four years. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreement, we ~~have effectively hedged our exposure to variability in the future cash flows attributable to the 3-month LIBOR~~pay a fixed rate of 3.63% on ~~$500.0~~$175.0 million of variable rate ~~debt.~~debt and receive interest at a variable rate based on the 1-month LIBOR. The ~~change in~~1-month LIBOR rate on each reset date determines the ~~fair values of the interest rate swaps is recorded on our consolidated balance sheet as an asset or liability with the effective~~variable portion of the interest rate ~~swaps’ gains~~swap for the one-month period following the reset date. No premium or ~~losses reported as a component of other comprehensive income and the ineffective portion reported in earnings. At December 31, 2007, the estimated aggregate fair value of~~discount was incurred by us upon entering into the interest rate ~~swaps~~swap because the pay and receive rates on the interest rate swap represented prevailing rates for the counterparty at the time the interest rate swap was ~~a liability of approximately $18.4 million.~~consummated.

We are also exposed to market risk arising from changes in foreign currency exchange rates as a result of our international operations. Generally, we export from the U.S. certain of the equipment and construction interior finish items and other operating supplies used by our international subsidiaries. ~~Principally all~~A majority of the revenues and operating expenses of our international subsidiaries are transacted in the country’s local currency. Generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. (“U.S. GAAP”) require that our subsidiaries use the currency of the primary economic environment in which they operate as their functional currency. If our subsidiaries operate in a highly inflationary economy, ~~generally accepted accounting principles in the~~ U.S. ~~require~~GAAP requires that the U.S. dollar be used as the functional currency for the subsidiary. Currency fluctuations in the countries in which we operate result in us reporting exchange gains (losses) or foreign currency translation ~~adjustments relating to our international subsidiaries depending on the inflationary environment of the country in which we operate.~~adjustments. Based upon our equity ownership in our international subsidiaries as of December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, holding everything else constant, a 10% immediate, simultaneous, unfavorable change in all of the foreign currency exchange rates to which we are exposed, would decrease the aggregate net book value of our investments in our international subsidiaries by approximately ~~$36~~$39 million and would decrease the aggregate net income of our international subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 by approximately ~~$1.7 million.~~$3 million and $4 million, respectively.

~~Item 9A (T). Controls and Procedures~~


Item 9A		. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, we carried out an evaluation required by the 1934 Act, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the 1934 Act. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the 1934 Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and were effective to provide reasonable assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the 1934 Act. The Company’s internal control framework and processes are designed to provide reasonable assurance to management and the board of directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2007~~2009 based on criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) inInternal Control—Integrated Framework. As a result of this assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, our internal control over financial reporting was effective.

Certifications of our CEO and our CFO, which are required in accordance with Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act, are attached as exhibits to this Annual Report. This “Controls and Procedures” section includes the information concerning the controls evaluation referred to in the certifications, and it should be read in conjunction with the certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.

The Company’s independent auditors, Deloitte & Touche LLP, with direct access to the Company’s board of directors through its Audit Committee, have audited the consolidated financial statements prepared by the Company. Their report on the consolidated financial statements is ~~effective.~~included in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. Deloitte & Touche LLP has issued an attestation report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Deloitte & Touche LLP’s report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is included herein.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There ~~were~~have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 that ~~was conducted~~occurred during the quarter ended December 31, ~~2007~~2009 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Limitations on Controls

Management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all ~~error and~~errors or fraud. Any control system, no matter how well designed and operated, is based upon certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that its objectives will be met. Further, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.

4349

Attestation Report of Deloitte & Touche, LLP

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors of
Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
Plano, Texas

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying management’s report on internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on the criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009 of the Company and our report dated March 10, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph related to the Company changing its method of accounting for noncontrolling interests and retrospectively adjusting all periods presented in the consolidated financial statements on those financial statements and financial statement schedule.

/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 10, 2010

PART III

~~Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance~~


Item 10.		Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement for its Annual Stockholders Meeting (under the headings “Election of Directors”, “Corporate Governance” and “Executive Officers”) to be held on May ~~15, 2008~~13, 2010 and to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, ~~2007.~~2009.

~~Item 11. Executive Compensation~~


Item 11.		Executive Compensation

Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement for its Annual Stockholders Meeting (under the heading “Executive Compensation”) to be held on May ~~15, 2008~~13, 2010 and to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, ~~2007.~~2009.


Item 12.		Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement for its Annual Stockholders Meeting (under the headings “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management”) to be held on May ~~15, 2008~~13, 2010 and to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, ~~2007.~~2009.

~~Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence~~


Item 13.		Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement for its Annual Stockholders Meeting (under the heading “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions”) to be held on May ~~15, 2008~~13, 2010 and to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, ~~2007.~~2009.

~~Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services~~


Item 14.		Principal Accounting Fees and Services

Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement for its Annual Stockholders Meeting (under the heading “Board Committees — Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”) to be held on May ~~15, 2008~~13, 2010 and to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, ~~2007.~~2009.

PART IV

~~Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules~~


Item 15.		Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(a)Documents Filed as Part of this Report

	1.		The financial statement schedules and related data listed in the accompanying Index beginning on page F-1 are filed as a part of this report.

The exhibits listed in the accompanying Index beginning on page E-1 are filed as a part of this report.

(b)Exhibits

See the accompanying Index beginning on page E-1.

(c)Financial Statement Schedules

~~None~~ Schedule I – Condensed Financial Information of Registrant beginning on page F-42.

All schedules not identified above have been omitted because they are not required, are not applicable or the information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes contained in this report.

4451

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: March ~~28, 2008~~

10, 2010

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC.

BY:

/s/ Alan W. Stock

Alan W. Stock

Chief Executive Officer

BY:

/s/ ~~Alan W. Stock~~

Robert Copple

~~Alan W. Stock~~

Robert Copple

~~Chief Executive Officer~~

~~BY:~~

~~/s/ Robert Copple~~

~~Robert Copple~~

Chief Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer

~~Principal Accounting Officer~~

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Each person whose signature appears below hereby severally constitutes and appoints Alan W. Stock and Robert Copple his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, each with the power of substitution and resubstitution, for him in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with accompanying exhibits and other related documents, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and ratify and confirm all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of said appointment.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


Name	Title	Date

/s/ Lee Roy Mitchell	Chairman of the Board of Directors and Director	March ~~28, 2008~~10, 2010

Lee Roy Mitchell

/s/ Alan W. Stock	Chief Executive Officer
Alan W. Stock	(principal executive officer)	March ~~28, 2008~~10, 2010

~~Alan W. Stock~~	~~(principal executive officer)~~

/s/ Robert Copple Robert Copple	Executive Vice President; Treasurer and Chief Financial	~~March 28, 2008~~

~~Robert Copple~~	Officer (principal financial and accounting officer)	March 10, 2010

/s/ Benjamin D. Chereskin	Director	March ~~28, 2008~~10, 2010

Benjamin D. Chereskin

/s/ Vahe A. Dombalagian	Director	March ~~28, 2008~~10, 2010

Vahe A. Dombalagian

/s/ Peter R. Ezersky	Director	March ~~28, 2008~~10, 2010

Peter R. Ezersky

/s/ Enrique F. Senior	Director	March ~~28, 2008~~10, 2010

Enrique F. Senior

/s/ Raymond W. Syufy	Director	March ~~28, 2008~~10, 2010

Raymond W. Syufy

/s/ Carlos M. Sepulveda	Director	March ~~28, 2008~~10, 2010

Carlos M. Sepulveda

/s/ Roger T. Staubach	Director	March ~~28, 2008~~10, 2010

Roger T. Staubach

/s/ Donald G. Soderquist	Director	March ~~28, 2008~~10, 2010
Donald G. Soderquist

~~Donald G. Soderquist~~/s/ Steven Rosenberg	Director	March 10, 2010
Steven Rosenberg

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors of
Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
Plano, Texas

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, ~~2006~~2008 and ~~2007,~~2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, ~~2007.~~2009. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on ~~these~~the financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit ~~also~~ includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial ~~statements,~~statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, ~~2006~~2008 and ~~2007,~~2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

As discussed in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements, ~~in 2007~~on January 1, 2009, the Company changed its method of accounting for ~~uncertainty~~noncontrolling interests and retrospectively adjusted all periods presented in ~~income taxes to adopt Financial~~the consolidated financial statements.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting ~~Standards~~Oversight Board ~~Interpretation No. 48, “~~(United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on the criteria established in~~Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes –~~Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 10, 2010 expressed an ~~interpretation of SFAS No. 109~~.”unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP

Dallas, Texas
March ~~24, 2008~~10, 2010

F-2

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share data)


	December 31,			December 31,		December 31,			December 31,
	2006			2007		2008			2009
ASSETS
Assets

CURRENT ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	147,099		$	338,043	$	349,603		$	437,936
Inventories		6,058			7,000		8,024			9,854
Accounts receivable		31,165			35,368		24,688			33,110
Income tax receivable		8,946			18,339		8,948			13,025
Current deferred tax asset		4,661			5,215
Deferred tax asset							2,799			3,321
Prepaid expenses and other		8,424			10,070		9,319			10,051

Total current assets		206,353			414,035		403,381			507,297

THEATRE PROPERTIES AND EQUIPMENT
Theatre properties and equipment
Land		104,578			97,532		96,718			94,879
Buildings		420,642			389,581		396,028			394,654
Property under capital lease		143,776			178,347		184,248			204,881
Theatre furniture and equipment		517,054			558,483		546,466			639,538
Leasehold interests and improvements		490,861			572,081		541,140			602,583
Theatres under construction		18,113			22,481

Total		1,695,024			1,818,505		1,764,600			1,936,535
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		370,452			504,439		556,317			716,947

Theatre properties and equipment, net		1,324,572			1,314,066		1,208,283			1,219,588

OTHER ASSETS
Other assets
Goodwill		1,205,423			1,134,689		1,039,818			1,116,302
Intangible assets — net		360,752			353,047		341,768			342,998
Investment in NCM							19,141			34,232
Investments in and advances to affiliates		11,390			3,662		4,284			3,529
Deferred charges and other assets — net		63,092			77,393		49,033			52,502

Total other assets		1,640,657			1,568,791		1,454,044			1,549,563

TOTAL ASSETS	$	3,171,582		$	3,296,892

Total assets						$	3,065,708		$	3,276,448


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity

CURRENT LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt	$	14,259		$	9,166	$	12,450		$	12,227
Current portion of capital lease obligations		3,649			4,684		5,532			7,340
Current liability for uncertain tax positions							10,775			13,229
Accounts payable		47,272			50,977		54,596			53,709
Accrued film rentals		47,862			42,140		43,750			69,216
Accrued interest		23,706			8,735		4,343			6,411
Accrued payroll		21,686			21,614		23,995			29,928
Accrued property taxes		22,165			23,031		23,486			22,913
Accrued other current liabilities		50,223			57,975		52,243			65,859

Total current liabilities		230,822			218,322		231,170			280,832

LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Long-term liabilities
Long-term debt, less current portion		1,897,394			1,514,579		1,496,012			1,531,478
Capital lease obligations, less current portion		112,178			116,486		118,180			133,028
Deferred income taxes		198,320			168,475
Long-term portion FIN 48 liability		—			15,500
Deferred tax liability							135,417			124,823
Liability for uncertain tax positions							6,748			18,432
Deferred lease expenses		14,286			19,235		23,371			27,698
Deferred revenue — NCM		—			172,696		189,847			203,006
Deferred revenues and other long-term liabilities		12,672			36,214
Other long-term liabilities							40,736			42,523

Total long-term liabilities		2,234,850			2,043,185		2,010,311			2,080,988

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (see Note 21)
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 22)

MINORITY INTERESTS IN SUBSIDIARIES		16,613			16,182
Stockholders’ equity
Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s stockholders’ equity
Common stock, $0.001 par value: 300,000,000 shares authorized, 108,835,365 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2008; and 114,222,523 shares issued and 110,917,105 shares outstanding at December 31, 2009							109			114
Additional paid-in-capital							962,353			1,011,667
Treasury stock, 3,305,418 common shares at cost							—			(43,895	)
Retained deficit							(78,859	)		(60,595	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss							(72,347	)		(7,459	)

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock, $0.001 par value: 300,000,000 shares authorized, 92,560,622 shares outstanding at December 31, 2006 and 106,983,684 shares outstanding at December 31, 2007		93			107
Additional paid-in-capital		685,433			939,327
Retained earnings (deficit)		(7,692	)		47,074
Accumulated other comprehensive income		11,463			32,695
Total Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s stockholders’ equity							811,256			899,832
Noncontrolling interests							12,971			14,796

Total stockholders’ equity		689,297			1,019,203		824,227			914,628


TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	3,171,582		$	3,296,892
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity						$	3,065,708		$	3,276,448

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 AND ~~2007~~

2009
(In ~~thousands)~~thousands, except per share data)


	December 31,			December 31,			December 31,			December 31,			December 31,			December 31,
	2005			2006			2007			2007			2008			2009
REVENUES
Revenues
Admissions	$	641,240		$	760,275		$	1,087,480		$	1,087,480		$	1,126,977		$	1,293,378
Concession		320,072			375,798			516,509			516,509			534,836			602,880
Other		59,285			84,521			78,852			78,852			80,474			80,242

Total revenues		1,020,597			1,220,594			1,682,841			1,682,841			1,742,287			1,976,500

COST OF OPERATIONS
Cost of operations
Film rentals and advertising		347,727			405,987			589,717			589,717			612,248			708,160
Concession supplies		52,507			59,020			81,074			81,074			86,618			91,918
Salaries and wages		101,431			118,616			173,290			173,290			180,950			203,437
Facility lease expense		138,477			161,374			212,730			212,730			225,595			238,779
Utilities and other		123,831			144,808			191,279			191,279			205,814			222,660
General and administrative expenses		50,884			67,768			79,518			79,518			90,788			96,497
Termination of profit participation agreement		—			—			6,952			6,952			—			—
Depreciation and amortization		81,952			95,821			148,781			148,781			155,326			148,264
Amortization of favorable leases		4,174			3,649			2,935
Amortization of favorable/unfavorable leases											2,935			2,708			1,251
Impairment of long-lived assets		51,677			28,537			86,558			86,558			113,532			11,858
(Gain) loss on sale of assets and other		4,436			7,645			(2,953	)		(2,953	)		8,488			3,202

Total cost of operations		957,096			1,093,225			1,569,881			1,569,881			1,682,067			1,726,026


OPERATING INCOME		63,501			127,369			112,960
Operating income											112,960			60,220			250,474

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Other income (expense)
Interest expense		(84,082	)		(109,328	)		(145,596	)		(145,596	)		(116,058	)		(102,505	)
Interest income		6,600			7,040			18,263			18,263			13,265			4,909
Gain on NCM transaction		—			—			210,773			210,773			—			—
Gain on Fandango transaction		—			—			9,205			9,205			—			—
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss)		(1,276	)		(258	)		438
Loss on early retirement of debt		(46	)		(8,283	)		(13,456	)
Foreign currency exchange gain											438			986			635
Gain (loss) on early retirement of debt											(13,456	)		1,698			(27,878	)
Distributions from NCM		—			—			11,499			11,499			18,838			20,822
Dividend income		—			101			50			50			49			51
Equity in income (loss) of affiliates		227			(1,646	)		(2,462	)
Minority interests in income of subsidiaries		(924	)		(1,469	)		(792	)
Equity in loss of affiliates											(2,462	)		(2,373	)		(907	)

Total other income (expense)		(79,501	)		(113,843	)		87,922			88,714			(83,595	)		(104,873	)


INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES		(16,000	)		13,526			200,882
Income (loss) before income taxes											201,674			(23,375	)		145,601
Income taxes		9,408			12,685			111,962			111,962			21,055			44,845

Net income (loss)											89,712			(44,430	)		100,756
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests											792			3,895			3,648

NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	(25,408	)	$	841		$	88,920
Net income (loss) attributable to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.										$	88,920		$	(48,325	)	$	97,108


EARNINGS PER SHARE — Basic	$	(0.31	)	$	0.01		$	0.87
Weighted average shares outstanding
Basic											102,177			107,341			108,563

EARNINGS PER SHARE — Diluted	$	(0.31	)	$	0.01		$	0.85
Diluted											104,720			107,341			110,255


Earnings (loss) per share attributable to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s common stockholders:

Basic										$	0.87		$	(0.45	)	$	0.89

Diluted										$	0.85		$	(0.45	)	$	0.87

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 AND ~~2007~~

2009
(In thousands)


											Accumulated																											Total
	Common Stock				Additional			Retained			Other																								Accumulated			Cinemark									Comprehensive Income (Loss)
	Shares				Paid-in			Earnings			Comprehensive						Comprehensive			Common Stock				Treasury Stock						Additional		Retained			Other			Holdings, Inc.						Total						Attributable to:
	Issued		Amount		Capital			(Deficit)			Income (Loss)			Total			Income (Loss)			Shares				Shares						Paid-in-		Earnings			Comprehensive			Stockholders’			Noncontrolling			Stockholders’			Cinemark			Noncontrolling
																				Issued		Amount		Issued			Amount			Capital		(Deficit)			Income (Loss)			Equity			Interests			Equity			Holdings, Inc.			Interests			Total
Balance at January 1, 2005		81,876	$	82	$	527,627		$	16,875		$	(11,384	)	$	533,200

Net loss									(25,408	)					(25,408	)	$	(25,408	)
Issuance of stock		655		1		4,999									5,000
Tax adjustment related to MDP merger fees						(82	)								(82	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment												6,639			6,639			6,639
Balance at January 1, 2007																					92,561	$	93		—		$	—		$	685,433	$	(7,692	)	$	11,463		$	689,297		$	16,613		$	705,910

Balance at December 31, 2005		82,531	$	83	$	532,544		$	(8,533	)	$	(4,745	)	$	519,349		$	(18,769	)


Net income									841						841		$	841
Issuance of stock — Century Acquisition		10,025		10		149,990									150,000
Exercise of stock options		5		—		35									35
Share based awards compensation expense						2,864									2,864
Foreign currency translation adjustment												16,208			16,208			16,208

Balance at December 31, 2006		92,561	$	93	$	685,433		$	(7,692	)	$	11,463		$	689,297		$	17,049


Net income									88,920						88,920		$	88,920
Tax adjustment related to the adoption of FIN48									(1,093	)					(1,093	)
Tax adjustment related to the adoption of paragraph 10 of FASB ASC Topic 740 (formerly FIN 48) related to uncertain tax positions																																	(1,093	)					(1,093	)					(1,093	)
Issuance of stock for initial public offering, net of fees		13,889		14		245,835									245,849						13,889		14								245,835								245,849						245,849
Issuance of restricted stock		22		—		200									200						22		—								—								—						—
Exercise of stock options, net of equity award repurchase		512		—		3,625									3,625						512		—								3,625								3,625						3,625
Share based awards compensation expense						2,881									2,881																3,081								3,081						3,081
Tax benefit related to stock option exercises						1,353									1,353																1,353								1,353						1,353
Distributions to stockholders									(33,061	)					(33,061	)
Fair value adjustment on interest rate swap agreements												(11,348	)		(11,348	)		(11,348	)
Dividends paid to stockholders																																	(33,061	)					(33,061	)					(33,061	)
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests																																							—			(1,730	)		(1,730	)
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net income																																	88,920						88,920			792			89,712			88,920			792			89,712
Fair value adjustments on interest rate swap agreements, net of taxes of $7,074																																				(11,348	)		(11,348	)		—			(11,348	)		(11,348	)		—			(11,348	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment												32,580			32,580			32,580																		32,580			32,580			507			33,087			32,580			507			33,087


Balance at December 31, 2007		106,984	$	107	$	939,327		$	47,074		$	32,695		$	1,019,203		$	110,152			106,984	$	107		—		$	—		$	939,327	$	47,074		$	32,695		$	1,019,203		$	16,182		$	1,035,385		$	110,152		$	1,299		$	111,451


Issuance of restricted stock, net of restricted stock forfeitures																					385		—																—						—
Exercise of stock options																					169		—								1,292								1,292						1,292
Share based awards compensation expense																															5,113								5,113						5,113
Tax benefit related to stock option exercises																															474								474						474
Issuance of shares as a result of Central America share exchange																					903		1								12,948								12,949			(3,245	)		9,704
Issuance of shares as a result of Ecuador share exchange																					394		1								3,199								3,200			(1,574	)		1,626
Dividends paid to stockholders																																	(77,534	)					(77,534	)					(77,534	)
Dividends accrued on unvested restricted stock awards																																	(74	)					(74	)					(74	)
Contribution by noncontrolling interest																																							—			585			585
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests																																							—			(1,353	)		(1,353	)
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net income (loss)																																	(48,325	)					(48,325	)		3,895			(44,430	)		(48,325	)		3,895			(44,430	)
Fair value adjustments on interest rate swap agreements, net of taxes of $2,442																																				(22,063	)		(22,063	)		—			(22,063	)		(22,063	)		—			(22,063	)
Amortization of accumulated other comprehensive loss on terminated swap agreement																																				1,351			1,351			—			1,351			1,351			—			1,351
Foreign currency translation adjustment																																				(84,330	)		(84,330	)		(1,519	)		(85,849	)		(84,330	)		(1,519	)		(85,849	)


Balance at December 31, 2008																					108,835	$	109		—		$	—		$	962,353	$	(78,859	)	$	(72,347	)	$	811,256		$	12,971		$	824,227		$	(153,367	)	$	2,376		$	(150,991	)


Issuance of restricted stock, net of restricted stock forfeitures																					479		—		(30	)		—			—		—			—			—			—			—
Exercise of stock options, net of stock withholdings																					4,908		5		(3,275	)		(43,895	)		37,442		—			—			(6,448	)		—			(6,448	)
Share based awards compensation expense																					—		—		—			—			4,304		—			—			4,304			—			4,304
Tax benefit related to stock option exercises																					—		—		—			—			7,545		—			—			7,545			—			7,545
Dividends paid to stockholders																					—		—		—			—			—		(78,643	)		—			(78,643	)		—			(78,643	)
Dividends accrued on unvested restricted stock awards																					—		—		—			—			—		(201	)		—			(201	)		—			(201	)
Purchase of noncontrolling interest share of an Argentina subsidiary																					—		—		—			—			23		—			—			23			(117	)		(94	)
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests																					—		—		—			—			—		—			—			—			(2,322	)		(2,322	)
Comprehensive income:																																							—						—
Net income																					—		—		—			—			—		97,108						97,108			3,648			100,756			97,108			3,648			100,756
Fair value adjustments on interest rate swap agreements, net of taxes of $2,359																					—		—		—			—			—		—			3,898			3,898			—			3,898			3,898			—			3,898
Amortization of accumulated other comprehensive loss on terminated swap agreement																					—		—		—			—			—		—			4,633			4,633			—			4,633			4,633			—			4,633
Foreign currency translation adjustment																					—		—		—			—			—		—			56,357			56,357			616			56,973			56,357			616			56,973


Balance at December 31, 2009																					114,222	$	114		(3,305	)	$	(43,895	)	$	1,011,667	$	(60,595	)	$	(7,459	)	$	899,832		$	14,796		$	914,628		$	161,996		$	4,264		$	166,260

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 AND ~~2007~~

2009
(In thousands)

2005 2006 2007
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income (loss) $ (25,408 ) $ 841 $ 88,920

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation 71,870 90,081 144,629
Amortization of intangible and other assets 14,256 9,389 7,087
Amortization of long-term prepaid rents 1,258 1,013 1,146
Amortization of debt issue costs 2,740 3,342 4,727
Amortization of deferred revenues, deferred lease incentives and other (660 ) (424 ) (2,508 )
Amortization of debt premium (3,105 ) (3,096 ) (678 )
Impairment of long-lived assets 51,677 28,537 86,558
Share based awards compensation expense — 2,864 3,081
Gain on NCM transaction — — (210,773 )
Gain on Fandango transaction — — (9,205 )
(Gain) loss on sale of assets and other 4,436 7,645 (2,953 )
Write-off unamortized debt issue costs and debt premium related to the early retirement of debt 46 5,811 (15,661 )
Accretion of interest on senior discount notes 38,549 40,425 41,423
Deferred lease expenses 3,137 4,717 5,979
Deferred income tax expenses (12,332 ) (7,011 ) (34,614 )
Equity in (income) loss of affiliates (227 ) 1,646 2,462
Minority interests in income of subsidiaries 924 1,469 792
Tax benefit related to stock option exercises — — 1,353
Other 202 — —

Changes in assets and liabilities:
Inventories (309 ) 787 (942 )
Accounts receivable (4,102 ) (9,884 ) (4,203 )
Prepaid expenses and other (649 ) 1,678 (1,646 )
Other assets (12,373 ) (2,370 ) (4 )
Advances with affiliates (121 ) (143 ) 200
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 14,082 82 2,120
Interest paid on repurchased senior discount notes — (5,381 ) (16,592 )
Increase in deferred revenues related to NCM transaction — — 174,001
Increase in deferred revenues related to Fandango transaction — — 5,000
Other long-term liabilities 1,198 5,734 1,323
Income tax receivable/payable 20,181 (22,090 ) 5,014

Net cash provided by operating activities 165,270 155,662 276,036

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Additions to theatre properties and equipment (75,605 ) (107,081 ) (146,304 )
Proceeds from sale of theatre properties and equipment 1,317 6,446 37,532
Increase in escrow deposit due to like-kind exchange — — (22,739 )
Acquisition of Century Theatres, Inc., net of cash acquired — (531,383 ) —
Purchase of shares in National CineMedia (7,329 ) — —
Net proceeds from sale of NCM stock — — 214,842
Net proceeds from sale of Fandango stock — — 11,347
Investment in joint venture — DCIP — — (1,500 )
Other — 271 —

Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities (81,617 ) (631,747 ) 93,178

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net proceeds from initial public offering — — 245,849
Issuance of common stock 5,000 35 3,626
Dividends paid to stockholders — — (33,061 )
Retirement of senior discount notes (1,302 ) (24,950 ) (43,136 )
Retirement of senior subordinated notes — (10,000 ) (332,066 )
Proceeds from senior secured credit facility — 1,120,000 —
Proceeds from other long-term debt 660 2,330 —
Payoff of long-term debt assumed in Century acquisition — (360,000 ) —
Payoff of former senior secured credit facility — (253,500 ) —
Repayments of other long-term debt (6,671 ) (8,895 ) (19,438 )
Payments on capital leases — (839 ) (3,759 )
Debt issue costs (239 ) (22,926 ) —
Other (1,198 ) (1,278 ) (1,730 )

Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities (3,750 ) 439,977 (183,715 )

EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 2,048 1,008 5,445

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 81,951 (35,100 ) 190,944
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
Beginning of period 100,248 182,199 147,099

End of period $ 182,199 $ 147,099 $ 338,043

~~SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION (see Note 19)~~


	2007			2008			2009
Operating activities
Net income (loss)	$	89,712		$	(44,430	)	$	100,756

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		144,629			151,425			144,055
Amortization of intangible and other assets and unfavorable leases		7,087			6,609			5,460
Amortization of long-term prepaid rents		1,146			1,717			1,389
Amortization of debt issue costs		4,727			4,696			4,775
Amortization of deferred revenues, deferred lease incentives and other		(2,508	)		(3,735	)		(4,810	)
Amortization of debt (premium) discount		(678	)		—			365
Amortization of accumulated other comprehensive loss related to interest rate swap agreement		—			1,351			4,633
Impairment of long-lived assets		86,558			113,532			11,858
Share based awards compensation expense		3,081			5,113			4,304
Gain on NCM transaction		(210,773	)		—			—
Gain on Fandango transaction		(9,205	)		—			—
(Gain) loss on sale of assets and other		(2,953	)		8,488			3,202
Gain on change in fair value of interest rate swap agreement		—			(5,422	)		—
Write-off unamortized debt issue costs and debt premium related to the early retirement of debt		(15,661	)		839			6,337
Accretion of interest on senior discount notes		41,423			40,294			8,085
Deferred lease expenses		5,979			4,350			3,960
Deferred income taxes		(34,614	)		(25,975	)		(12,614	)
Equity in loss of affiliates		2,462			2,373			907
Tax benefit related to stock option exercises		1,353			474			7,545
Interest paid on repurchased senior discount notes		(16,592	)		(15,186	)		(158,349	)
Increase in deferred revenue related to NCM transaction		174,001			—			—
Increase in deferred revenue related to Fandango transaction		5,000			—			—
Increase in deferred revenue related to new U.S. beverage agreement		—			—			6,550
Distributions from equity investees		—			644			2,699
Changes in other assets and liabilities		1,862			10,137			35,656

Net cash provided by operating activities		276,036			257,294			176,763

Investing activities
Additions to theatre properties and equipment		(146,304	)		(106,109	)		(124,797	)
Proceeds from sale of theatre properties and equipment		37,532			2,539			2,178
Increase in escrow deposit due to like-kind exchange		(22,739	)		(2,089	)		—
Return of escrow deposits		—			24,828			—
Acquisition of theatres in the U.S.		—			(5,011	)		(48,950	)
Acquisition of theatres in Brazil		—			(5,100	)		(9,061	)
Net proceeds from sale of NCM stock		214,842			—			—
Net proceeds from sale of Fandango stock		11,347			—			—
Investment in joint venture — DCIP		(1,500	)		(4,000	)		(2,500	)

Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities		93,178			(94,942	)		(183,130	)

Financing activities
Net proceeds from initial public offering		245,849			—			—
Proceeds from stock option exercises		3,625			1,292			2,524
Payroll taxes paid as a result of immaculate option exercises		—			—			(8,972	)
Dividends paid to stockholders		(33,061	)		(77,534	)		(78,643	)
Retirement of senior discount notes		(43,136	)		(29,559	)		(261,054	)
Retirement of senior subordinated notes		(332,066	)		(3	)		—
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes		—			—			458,532
Repayments of other long-term debt		(19,438	)		(10,430	)		(12,605	)
Payments on capital leases		(3,759	)		(4,901	)		(6,064	)
Payment of debt issue costs		—			—			(13,003	)
Termination of interest rate swap agreement		—			(12,725	)		—
Other		(1,729	)		(1,231	)		(2,416	)

Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities		(183,715	)		(135,091	)		78,299

Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents		5,445			(15,701	)		16,401


Increase in cash and cash equivalents		190,944			11,560			88,333

Cash and cash equivalents:
Beginning of year		147,099			338,043			349,603

End of year	$	338,043		$	349,603		$	437,936


Supplemental information (see Note 20)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

F-6

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In thousands, except share and per share data

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Business— Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) ~~are leaders~~is the second largest motion picture exhibitor in the ~~motion picture exhibition industry~~world in terms of both ~~revenues~~attendance and the number of screens in operation, with theatres in the United States (“U.S.”), Canada, Brazil, Mexico, Chile, Colombia, Argentina, ~~Brazil, Chile,~~ Ecuador, Peru, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama and ~~Colombia.~~Guatemala. The Company also managed additional theatres in the U.S., ~~Canada,~~ Brazil, and Colombia during the year ended December 31, ~~2007.~~2009.

Basis of Presentation —On April 2, 2004, an affiliate of Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC, or MDP, acquired approximately 83% of the capital stock of Cinemark, Inc., pursuant to which a newly formed subsidiary owned by an affiliate of MDP was merged with and into Cinemark, Inc., with Cinemark, Inc. continuing as the surviving corporation (the “MDP Merger”). Simultaneously, an affiliate of MDP purchased shares of Cinemark, Inc.’s common stock and became Cinemark, Inc.’s controlling stockholder. Lee Roy Mitchell, Chairman and then Chief Executive Officer, the Mitchell Special Trust and certain members of management collectively retained a minority ownership of Cinemark, Inc.’s capital stock. In December 2004, MDP sold a portion of its stock in Cinemark, Inc. to outside investors and in July 2005, Cinemark, Inc. issued additional shares to another outside investor.

Principles of Consolidation— The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Cinemark Holdings, Inc., its subsidiaries and ~~subsidiaries.~~its affiliates. Majority-owned subsidiaries that the Company has control of are consolidated while those ~~subsidiaries~~affiliates of which the Company owns between 20% and 50% and does not control are accounted for ~~as affiliates~~ under the equity method. Those ~~subsidiaries~~affiliates of which the Company owns less than 20% are generally accounted for ~~as affiliates~~ under the cost method, unless the Company is deemed to have the ability to exercise significant influence over the affiliate, in which case the Company would account for its investment under the equity method. The results of these subsidiaries and affiliates are included in the consolidated financial statements effective with their formation or from their dates of acquisition. ~~Significant intercompany~~Intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.

Cash and Cash Equivalents— Cash and cash equivalents consist of operating funds held in financial institutions, petty cash held by the theatres and highly liquid investments with remaining maturities of three months or less when purchased. At December 31, ~~2007, our~~2009, cash investments were primarily in money market funds.

Inventories— Concession and theatre supplies inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market.

~~F-7~~

~~CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~In thousands, except share and per share data~~

Theatre Properties and Equipment— Theatre properties and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Additions to theatre properties and equipment include the capitalization of ~~$74, $86,~~$618, $270 and ~~$618~~$0 of interest incurred during the development and construction of theatres induring the years ended December 31, ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 and ~~2007,~~2009, respectively. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:


Category		Useful Life
Buildings on owned land		40 years
Buildings on leased land		Lesser of lease term or useful life
Buildings under capital lease		Lesser of lease term or useful life
Theatre furniture and equipment		5 to 15 years
Leasehold ~~interests and~~ improvements		Lesser of lease term or useful life

~~In accordance with SFAS No. 144, “~~~~Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets~~~~,” the~~The Company ~~evaluates theatre properties and equipment~~reviews long-lived assets for impairment ~~in conjunction with the preparation of its~~indicators on a quarterly ~~consolidated financial statements~~basis or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. ~~When estimated~~

The Company considers actual theatre level cash flows, ~~will~~future years budgeted theatre level cash flows, theatre property and equipment carrying values, amortizing intangible asset carrying values, the age of a recently built theatre, competitive theatres in the marketplace, changes in foreign currency exchange rates, the impact of recent ticket price changes, available lease renewal options and other factors considered relevant in its assessment of impairment of individual theatre assets. Long-lived assets are evaluated for impairment on an individual theatre basis, which the Company believes is the lowest applicable level for which there are identifiable cash flows. The impairment evaluation is based on the estimated undiscounted cash flows from continuing use through the remainder of the theatre’s useful life. The remainder of the useful life correlates with the available remaining lease period, which includes the probability of renewal periods for leased properties and a period of twenty years for fee owned properties. If the estimated undiscounted cash flows are not be sufficient to recover a long-lived asset’s carrying ~~amount, an impairment review is performed in which~~value, the Company then compares the carrying value of the asset group (theatre) with its estimated fair ~~value, which is determined based on a multiple of cash flows. The multiple was eight times for the evaluations performed during 2007 and 2006 and seven times for 2005.~~value. When estimated fair value is determined to be lower than the carrying value of the asset group (theatre), the asset group (theatre) is written down to its estimated fair value. Significant judgment is involved in estimating cash flows and fair value. Management’s estimates, which fall under Level 3, are based on historical and projected operating performance, ~~as well as~~ recent market ~~transactions. See Note 11.~~

~~The Company has made certain reclassifications between the cost of theatre properties~~transactions, and equipment and the related accumulated depreciation for the December 31, 2006 balance sheet. These reclassifications were made to properly reflect the results of impairment charges recorded on such assets. The impact on theatre properties and equipment, net as of December 31, 2006 was zero.

~~Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets~~~~— Goodwill is the excess of cost over fair value of theatre businesses acquired. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, “~~~~Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets~~,” goodwill and tradename are tested for impairment at the reporting unit level at least annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors considered include significant underperformance relative to historical or projected business and significant negativecurrent industry or economic trends. Goodwill impairment is evaluated using a two-step approach requiring the Company to compute the fair value of a reporting unit (generally at the theatre level), and compare it with its carrying value. If the carrying value of the theatre exceeds its fair value, a second step is performed to measure the potential goodwill impairment. Fair value is estimated based on a multiple of cash flows. The multiple was eight times for the goodwill impairment evaluations performed during 2007 and 2006 and seven times for 2005. Significant judgment is involved in estimating cash flows and fair value. Management’s estimates are based on historical and projected operating performance as well as recent market transactions. See Notes 10 and 11.trading

~~F-8~~F-7

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In thousands, except share and per share data

multiples. Fair value is determined based on a multiple of cash flows, which was eight times for the evaluations performed during 2007 and the first, second and third quarters of 2008 and six and a half times for the evaluation performed during the fourth quarter of 2008 and the evaluations performed during 2009. The Company reduced the multiple it used to determine fair value during the fourth quarter of 2008 due to the dramatic decline in estimated market values that resulted from a significant decrease in its stock price and the declines in the market capitalizations of the Company and its competitors that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2008. The long-lived asset impairment charges recorded during each of the periods presented are specific to theatres that were directly and individually impacted by increased competition, adverse changes in market demographics or adverse changes in the development or the conditions of the areas surrounding the theatre. See
Note 12.

Goodwill and Other Intangible ~~assets consist~~Assets— Goodwill is the excess of cost over fair value of theatre businesses acquired. Goodwill is evaluated for impairment on an annual basis during the fourth quarter or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill might exceed its estimated fair value. The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level and has allocated goodwill to the reporting unit based on an estimate of its relative fair value. Goodwill impairment is evaluated using a two-step approach requiring the Company to compute the fair value of a reporting unit and compare it with its carrying value. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, a second step is performed to measure the potential goodwill impairment. Significant judgment is involved in estimating cash flows and fair value. Management’s estimates, which fall under Level 3, are based on historical and projected operating performance, recent market transactions, and current industry trading multiples. Fair value is determined based on a multiple of cash flows, which was eight times for the goodwill impairment evaluations performed during 2007 and six and a half times for the evaluations performed during 2008 and 2009. The Company reduced the multiple it used to determine fair value during the fourth quarter of 2008 due to the dramatic decline in estimated market values that resulted from a significant decrease in its stock price and the declines in the market capitalizations of the Company and its competitors that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2008. Prior to January 1, 2008, the Company considered its theatres reporting units for purposes of evaluating goodwill for impairment. Changes in the organization, including changes in the structure of the Company’s executive management team, the Company’s initial public offering of common stock, the resulting changes in the level at which the Company’s management team evaluates the business on a regular basis, and the Century Acquisition that increased the size of the Company’s theatre base by approximately 25%, led the Company to conclude that its U.S. regions and international countries are now more reflective of how it manages and operates its business. Accordingly, the Company’s U.S. regions and international countries represent the appropriate reporting units for purposes of evaluating goodwill for impairment. Consequently, effective January 1, 2008, the Company changed the reporting unit to sixteen regions in the U.S. and each of its eight countries internationally (Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama and Guatemala are considered one reporting unit) from approximately four hundred theatres. The goodwill impairment test performed during December 2007 that resulted in the recording of impairment charges during the year ended December 31, 2007 reflected the final calculation utilizing theatres as reporting units. See Notes 11 and 12.

Tradename intangible assets are tested for impairment at least annually during the fourth quarter or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. The Company estimates the fair value of its tradenames ~~capitalized licensing fees, vendor contracts, net favorable leases, and other~~by applying an estimated market royalty rate that could be charged for the use of the Company’s tradename to forecasted future revenues, with an adjustment for the present value of such royalties. If the estimated fair value is less than the carrying value, the tradename intangible ~~assets.~~asset is written down to the estimated fair value.

The table below summarizes the Company’s intangible assets and the amortization method used for each type of intangible asset:


Intangible Asset		Amortization Method
Goodwill		Indefinite-lived
Tradename		Indefinite-lived
Capitalized licensing fees		Straight-line method over 15 years. The remaining terms of the underlying agreements range from 7approximately 5 to 1211 years.
Vendor contracts		Straight-line method over the terms of the underlying contracts. The remaining terms of the underlying contracts range from 12 to 1513 years.
~~Net favorable~~Favorable/unfavorable leases		Based on the pattern in which the economic benefits are realized over the terms of the lease agreements. The remaining terms of the lease agreements range from 1 to 2926 years.
Other intangible assets		Straight-line method over the terms of the underlying agreement. The remaining term of the underlying ~~agreement is~~agreements range from 5 to 11 years.

F-8

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In thousands, except share and per share data

Deferred Charges and Other Assets— Deferred charges and other assets consist of debt issue costs, long-term prepaid rents, construction advances and other deposits, equipment to be placed in service and other assets. Debt issue costs are amortized using the straight-line method (which approximates the effective interest method) over the primary financing terms of the related debt agreement. Long-term prepaid rents represent advance rental payments on operating leases. These payments are recognized to facility lease expense over the period for which the rent was paid in advance as outlined in the lease agreements. These periods generally range from 10 to 20 years.

Lease Accounting— The Company ~~accounts for leased properties under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 13, “~~~~Accounting for Leases"~~~~, and other authoritative accounting literature. SFAS No. 13 requires that the Company evaluate~~evaluates each lease for classification as either a capital lease or an operating lease. ~~According to SFAS No. 13, if~~If substantially all of the benefits and risks of ownership have been transferred to the lessee, the ~~lessee~~Company records the lease as a capital lease at its inception. The Company performs this evaluation at the inception of the lease and when a modification is made to a lease. If the lease agreement calls for a scheduled rent increase during the lease term, the Company ~~in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Technical Bulletin 85-3, “~~~~Accounting for Operating Leases with Scheduled Rent Increases"~~, recognizes the lease expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term as deferred lease expense. The Company determines the straight-line rent expense impact of an operating lease upon inception of the lease. For leases in which the Company is involved with construction of the theatre, the Company accounts for the lease during the construction period under the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) 97-10, “~~The Effect of Lessee Involvement in Asset Construction"~~. The landlord is typically responsible for constructing a theatre using guidelines and specifications agreed to by the Company and assumes substantially all of the risk of construction. ~~In accordance with EITF 97-10, if~~If the Company concludes that it has substantially all of the construction period risks, it records a construction asset and related liability for the amount of total project costs incurred during the construction period. At the end of the construction period, the Company ~~considers SFAS No. 98,~~~~“Accounting for Leases: Sale-leaseback Transactions Involving Real Estate"~~~~, to determine~~determines if the transaction qualifies for sale-leaseback accounting treatment in regards to lease classification.

Deferred Revenues— Advances collected on long-term screen advertising, concession and other contracts are recorded as deferred revenues. In accordance with the terms of the agreements, the advances collected on such contracts are recognized during the period in which the advances are earned, which may differ from the period in which the advances are collected. Revenues related to these advances are recognized on either a straight-line basis over the term of the contracts or as such revenues are earned in accordance with the terms of the contracts.

Casualty Insurance —The Company is self-insured for general liability claims up to $250 per occurrence with an annual cap of approximately $2,650 per policy year and is self-insured for medical claims up to $100 per occurrence. The Company is fully insured for workers compensation claims. As of December 31, 2008 and 2009, the Company maintained insurance reserves of $8,116 and $8,022, respectively.

Revenue and Expense Recognition— Revenues are recognized when admissions and concession sales are received at the box office. Other revenues primarily consist of screen advertising. Screen advertising revenues are recognized over the period that the related advertising is delivered on-screen or in-theatre. The Company records proceeds from the sale of gift cards and other advanced sale-type certificates in current liabilities and recognizes admissions and concession revenue when a holder redeems the card or certificate. The Company recognizes unredeemed gift cards and other advanced sale-type certificates as revenue only after such a period of time indicates, based on historical experience, the likelihood of redemption is remote, and based on applicable laws and regulations. In evaluating the likelihood of redemption, the Company considers the period outstanding, the level and frequency of activity, and the period of

~~F-9~~

~~CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~In thousands, except share and per share data~~

inactivity. The Company recognized unredeemed gift cards and other advance sale-type certificates as revenues in the amount of ~~$3,374, $4,421~~$5,516, $7,629 and ~~$3,975~~$7,162 during the years ended December 31, ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 and ~~2007,~~2009, respectively.

Film rental costs are accrued based on the applicable box office receipts and either the mutually agreed upon firm terms or sliding scale formula, which are established prior to the opening of the ~~picture,~~film, or estimates of the final mutually agreed upon settlement, which occurs at the conclusion of the ~~picture~~film run, subject to the film licensing arrangement. Under a firm terms formula, the Company pays the distributor a mutually agreed upon specified percentage of box office receipts, which reflects either a mutually agreed upon aggregate rate for the life of the film or rates that decline over the term of the run. Under the sliding scale formula, film rental is paid as a percentage of box office revenues using a pre-determined matrix based upon box office performance of the film. The settlement process allows for negotiation of film rental fees upon the conclusion of the film run based upon how the film performs. Estimates are based on the expected success of a ~~film over the length of its run in theatres.~~film. The success of a film can typically be determined a few weeks after a film is released when initial box office performance of the film is known. Accordingly, final settlements typically approximate estimates since box office receipts are known at the time the estimate is made and the expected success of a film ~~over the length of its run in theatres~~ can typically be estimated early in the film’s run. ~~The final film settlement amount is negotiated at the conclusion of the film’s run based upon how a film actually performs.~~ If actual settlements are ~~higher~~different than those ~~estimated, additional~~estimates, film rental costs are ~~recorded~~adjusted at that time. ~~The Company recognizes advertising costs and any sharing arrangements with film distributors in the same accounting period. The Company’s advertising~~Advertising costs are expensed as ~~incurred. Advertising expenses~~incurred and we expensed $17,252, $16,839 and $15,104, respectively for the years ended December 31, ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 and ~~2007 were $15,927, $15,726 and $17,252, respectively.~~2009.

Accounting for Share Based Awards— ~~Subsequent to the MDP Merger, the~~The Company established a long term incentive plan (see Note 18). The weighted average fair value per share of stock options granted by the Company during 2004 and 2005 was $7.63 (all of which had an exercise price equal to the market value at the date of grant). For each 2004 and 2005 grant, compensation expense under the fair value method of SFAS No. 123 was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

September 30, 2004 January 28, 2005
Grant Grant
Expected life 6.5 years 6.5 years
Expected volatility⁽¹⁾
39 % 44 %
Risk-free interest rate 3.79 % 3.93 %
Dividend yield 0 % 0 %
Grant date fair value $ 3.51 $ 3.80


⁽¹⁾		~~Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of the common stock price of comparable public companies.~~

~~Forfeitures were estimated based on the Company’s historical stock option activity.~~

~~In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), “~~~~Share Based Payment~~”, which established accounting standards for all transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods and services. SFAS No. 123(R) eliminated the intrinsic value measurement objective in Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25 and generally requires a Company to measuremeasures the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the fair value of the award on the date of the grant. The ~~standard requires~~ grant date fair value ~~to be~~

F-9

~~CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~In thousands, except share and per share data~~

~~The Company applied Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25~~ and related ~~interpretations in accounting for its stock option plans prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R). Had~~ compensation ~~costs been determined based on the fair value at the date of grant for awards under the stock option plans, consistent with the method of SFAS No. 123, “~~~~Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation~~~~” and SFAS No. 148, “~~~~Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure~~~~”, the Company’s net loss for the year ended December 31, 2005 would have been reduced to the pro-forma amount indicated below:~~

Net loss as reported $ (25,408 )
Compensation expense included in reported net loss, net of tax —
Compensation expense under fair-value method, net of tax (2,964 )

Pro-forma net loss $ (28,372 )

Basic and diluted loss per share
As Reported $ (0.31 )
Pro-forma $ (0.35 )

During October 2007, the Company granted 21,880 shares of restricted stock to its independent directors. The fair value of the shares was approximately $400 based on the market value of the Company’s stock on the date of grant. The awards fully vest on June 29, 2008 after one year of service. The Company recorded compensation expense of $200 related to these awards during the year ended December 31, 2007. The remaining unrecognized compensation expense related to these awards of $200 will be recorded during 2008.expense.

Income Taxes —The Company uses an asset and liability approach to financial accounting and reporting for income taxes. Deferred income taxes are provided when tax laws and financial accounting standards differ with respect to the amount of income for a year and the basis of assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the carrying amount of deferred tax assets unless it is more likely than not that such assets will be realized. Income taxes are provided on unremitted earnings from foreign subsidiaries unless such earnings are expected to be indefinitely reinvested. Income taxes have also been provided for potential tax assessments. The related tax accruals are recorded in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 48,“Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of SFAS No. 109”(“FIN ~~48)~~48” or FASB ASC Topic 740,Income Taxes[“FASB ASC Topic 740"]), which the Company adopted on January 1, 2007. FIN 48 (FASB ASC Topic 740) clarifies the accounting and reporting for income taxes recognized in accordance with SFAS No. 109,“Accounting for Income Taxes”(FASB ASC Topic 740), and the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns. The evaluation of a tax position ~~in accordance with FIN 48~~ is a two-step process. The first step is recognition: The Company determines whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. In evaluating whether a tax position has met the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, the Company should presume that the position would be examined by the appropriate taxing authority that would have full knowledge of all relevant information. The second step is measurement: A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is measured to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. The tax position is measured atas the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Differences between tax positions taken in a tax return and amounts recognized in the financial statements result in (1) ~~an increase~~a change in a liability for income taxes payable or (2) a ~~reduction of~~change in an income tax refund receivable, ~~or a reduction in~~ a deferred tax asset or ~~an increase in~~ a deferred tax liability or both (1) and (2). The Company accrues interest and penalties on its uncertain tax positions.

Segments— As of December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, the Company managed its business under two reportable operating segments, U.S. markets and international markets, in accordance with ~~SFAS No. 131 “~~FASB ASC Topic 280,~~Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.~~Segment Reporting”. See Note ~~22.~~23.

Use of Estimates— The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires ~~management to make~~the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. The Company’s consolidated financial statements include amounts that are based on management’s best estimates and judgments. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

~~F-11~~

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In thousands, except share and per share data

Fair ~~Values~~Value Measurements —The Company has interest rate swap agreements that are adjusted to fair value on a recurring basis (quarterly). The Company uses the income approach to determine the fair value of ~~Financial Instruments— Fair~~its interest rate swap agreements and under this approach, the Company uses projected future interest rates as provided by the counterparties to the interest rate swap agreements and the fixed rates that the Company is obligated to pay under these agreements. According to authoritative guidance, inputs used in fair value measurements fall into three different categories; Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Therefore, the Company’s measurements use significant unobservable inputs, which fall in Level 3. There were no changes in valuation techniques during the period, no transfers in or out of Level 3 and no gains or losses included in earnings that were attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses related to the interest rate swap agreements. Below is a reconciliation of our interest rate swap values, as included in other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets, from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2009:


Beginning balance — January 1, 2008	$	(18,422	)
Total gains (losses):
Included in earnings (as a component of interest expense)		5,422
Included in accumulated other comprehensive loss		(24,506	)
Settlements		12,725

Ending balance — December 31, 2008	$	(24,781	)
Total gains (losses):
Included in accumulated other comprehensive loss		6,257

Ending balance — December 31, 2009	$	(18,524	)

See Note 15 for further discussion of ~~financial instruments, including~~the terms of the Company’s interest rate swap agreements, are estimated by the Company using available market information and other valuation methods. Values are based on available market quotes or estimates using a discounted cash flow approach based on the interest rates currently available for similar instruments. The fair values of financial instruments for which estimated fair value amounts are not specifically presented are estimated to approximate the recorded values.agreements.

Acquisitions— The Company accounts for acquisitions under the ~~purchase~~acquisition method of ~~accounting in accordance with SFAS No. 141, “~~~~Business Combinations~~”.accounting. The ~~purchase~~acquisition method requires that the ~~Company estimate the~~acquired assets and liabilities, including contingencies, be recorded at fair value ofdetermined on the ~~assets acquired~~acquisition date and ~~liabilities assumed and allocate consideration paid accordingly.~~changes thereafter reflected in income. For significant acquisitions, the Company obtains independent third party valuation studies for certain of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed to assist the Company in determining fair value. The estimation of the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed involves a number of estimates and assumptions that could differ materially from the actual amounts recorded.

~~Comprehensive Income (Loss) —~~~~Total comprehensive income (loss) for~~ The Company provides the ~~years ended December 31, 2005, 2006~~assumptions, including both quantitative and ~~2007, was $(18,769), $17,049~~qualitative information, about the specified asset or liability to the third party valuation firms. The Company primarily utilizes the third parties to accumulate comparative data from multiple sources and ~~$110,152, respectively. Total comprehensive income (loss) consists of net income (loss), foreign currency translation adjustments~~assemble a report that summarizes the information obtained. The Company then uses the information to determine fair value. The third party valuation firms are supervised by Company personnel who are knowledgeable about valuations and fair ~~value adjustments on~~value. The Company evaluates the ~~Company’s interest rate swap agreements.~~appropriateness of the valuation methodology utilized by the third party valuation firm.

2. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157 (FASB Accounting Standards Codification [“ASC”] Topic 820),“Fair Value Measurements.”Among other requirements, this statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The statement applies whenever other statements require or permit assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. SFAS No. 157 is(FASB ASC Topic 820) was effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2008 (January 1, 2009 for nonfinancial assets and liabilities). Adoption of this statement isdid not ~~expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.~~

~~In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,~~~~“The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”.~~This statement provides companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value that are currently not required to be measured at fair value. SFAS No. 159 establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 159 is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2009. The Company has elected not to measure eligible items at fair value upon initial adoption. Adoption of this statement is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R) (FASB ASC Topic 805), “Business Combinations”. This statement requires all business combinations completed after the effective date to be accounted for by applying the acquisition method (previously referred to as the purchase method); expands the definition of transactions and events that qualify as business combinations; requires that the acquired assets and liabilities, including contingencies, be recorded at the fair value determined on the acquisition date and changes thereafter reflected in income, not goodwill; changes the recognition timing for restructuring costs; and requires acquisition costs to be expensed as ~~incurred.~~incurred rather than being capitalized as part of the cost of the acquisition. Adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) is(FASB ASC Topic 805) was required for business combinations that occur after December 15, 2008. Early adoption and retroactive application of SFAS No.

F-11

~~CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~In thousands, except share and per share data~~

on the face of the income statement. SFAS No. 160 (FASB ASC Topic 810) requires disclosure, on the face of the consolidated income statement, of the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling interest. SFAS No. 160 (FASB ASC Topic 810) clarifies that changes in a parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation are equity transactions if the parent retains its controlling financial interest. In addition, this statement requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. Such gain or loss will be measured using the fair value of the noncontrolling equity investment on the deconsolidation date. SFAS No. 160 (FASB ASC Topic 810) also includes expanded disclosure requirements regarding the interests of the parent and its noncontrolling interest. SFAS No. 160 is(FASB ASC Topic 810) was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. ~~Earlier~~Upon adoption ~~is prohibited.~~of this statement, the Company has recognized its noncontrolling interest as equity in the consolidated balance sheets, has reflected net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in consolidated net income (loss) in the statements of operations and has provided, in its consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), a summary of changes in equity attributable to Cinemark Holdings, Inc., changes attributable to noncontrolling interests and changes in total equity for all periods presented.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161 (FASB ASC Topic 815) “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133”. This statement intends to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures about their impact on an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 (FASB ASC Topic 815) requires disclosures regarding the objectives for using derivative instruments, the fair values of derivative instruments and their related gains and losses, and the accounting for derivatives and related hedged items. SFAS No. 161 (FASB ASC Topic 815) was effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early adoption permitted. The ~~Company is evaluating the~~ adoption of SFAS No. ~~160~~161 (FASB ASC Topic 815) did not impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements, nor did it have a significant impact on the Company’s disclosures.

In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position Emerging Issues Task Force 03-6-1 (FASB ASC Topic 260),“Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities”(“FSP-EITF 03-6-1”). Under FSP-EITF 03-6-1 (FASB ASC Topic 260), unvested share based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and ~~its~~shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. FSP-EITF 03-6-1 (FASB ASC Topic 260) was effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years and requires retrospective application. The adoption of FSP-EITF 03-6-1 (FASB ASC Topic 260) did not have a significant impact on the Company’s earnings per share calculations.

F-12

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In thousands, except share and per share data

3. INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING OF COMMON STOCK

On April 24, 2007, the Company completed an initial public offering of its common stock. The Company sold 13,888,889 shares of its common stock and selling stockholders sold an additional 14,111,111 shares of common stock at a price of $17.955 ($19 per share less underwriting discounts). The net proceeds (before expenses) received by the Company were $249,375 and the Company paid approximately $3,526 in legal, accounting and other fees, all of which are recorded in additional paid-in-capital. The selling stockholders granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 2,800,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $17.955 ($19 per share less underwriting discounts). On May 21, 2007, the underwriters purchased an additional 269,100 shares from the selling stockholders pursuant to this option. The Company did not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling stockholders. The Company has utilized a portion of the net proceeds that it received from the offering to repurchase a portion of ~~its~~Cinemark, Inc.’s outstanding 9³/4% senior discount notes. See Note ~~13. The Company expects to continue to use the net proceeds to repurchase a portion of the remaining 9~~³/4~~% senior discount notes or repay debt outstanding under the senior secured credit facility. The 9~~³/4~~% senior discount notes are not currently subject to repurchase at the Company’s option. Accordingly, if the Company is unable to repurchase the 9~~³/4~~% senior discount notes at acceptable prices, the Company expects to use a portion of the remaining net proceeds to repay term loan debt outstanding under the senior secured credit facility.~~14. The Company has significant flexibility in applying the net remaining proceeds from the initial public offering. The Company has invested the remaining net proceeds in ~~short-term, investment-grade marketable securities or~~ money market funds.

4. EARNINGS PER SHARE

As of January 1, 2009, the Company determined that its unvested share based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and have included such participating securities in its computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method for the periods during which such participating securities were outstanding.

Basic earnings ~~(loss)~~ per share for the two classes of stock (common stock and unvested restricted stock) is ~~computed~~calculated by dividing net income ~~(loss) by the weighted average number of shares of all classes of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing income (loss)~~ by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and unvested restricted stock outstanding during the reported period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated using the weighted average number of shares of common stock and unvested restricted stock plus the potentially dilutive effect of common equivalent shares outstanding determined under both the two class method and the treasury stock method.

For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, basic earnings (loss) per share was the same under both the two class method and the treasury stock method. For years ended December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2008, diluted earnings (loss) per share was the same under both the two class method and the treasury stock method. For the year ended December 31, 2009, diluted earnings per share under the two class method was $0.87 and under the treasury stock method was $0.88. The following table ~~sets forth the computation~~presents computations of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share ~~(shares in thousands):~~

Years Ended December 31,
2005 2006 2007

Net income (loss) $ (25,408 ) $ 841 $ 88,920
Basic:
Weighted average common shares outstanding (in 000’s) 82,199 84,948 102,177

Net income (loss) per common share $ (0.31 ) $ 0.01 $ 0.87

Diluted:
Weighted average common shares outstanding (in 000’s) 82,199 84,948 102,177
Common equivalent shares for stock options (in 000’s) — 1,670 2,543

Weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding (in 000’s) 82,199 86,618 104,720

Net income (loss) per common and common equivalent share $ (0.31 ) $ 0.01 $ 0.85

under the two class method:

F-13

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In thousands, except share and per share data

~~5. DIVIDEND PAYMENTS~~

In August 2007, the Company initiated a quarterly dividend policy. Consistent with the disclosures in the Company’s 424(b)(1) prospectus, the dividend for the second quarter of 2007 was based on a dividend rate of $0.18 per share, prorated based on the April 27, 2007 closing of the Company’s initial public offering. Based on the above proration, the Company’s board of directors declared a cash dividend for the second quarter of 2007 of $0.13 per common share payable to stockholders of record on September 4, 2007, which was paid on September 18, 2007. On November 9, 2007, the Company’s board of directors declared a cash dividend for the third quarter of 2007 of $0.18 per common share payable to stockholders of record on December 3, 2007. The dividend was paid on December 18, 2007. The aggregate amount of dividends paid to stockholders during 2007 was $33,061.

~~6. ACQUISITION OF CENTURY THEATRES, INC. AND RELATED REFINANCING OF CERTAIN LONG-TERM DEBT~~

On October 5, 2006, the Company completed its acquisition of Century Theatres, Inc. (“Century”), a national theatre chain headquartered in San Rafael, California with approximately 77 theatres in 12 states, for a purchase price of approximately $681,225 and the assumption of approximately $360,000 of debt of Century. Of the total purchase price, $150,000 consisted of the issuance of shares of Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s common stock. The Company also incurred approximately $7,448 in transaction costs.

~~The transaction was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with SFAS No. 141, “~~~~Business Combinations~~~~”. The following table represents the allocation of purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed:~~

Current assets⁽¹⁾
$ 32,635
Fixed assets⁽²⁾
548,451
Goodwill⁽²⁾
640,436
Tradename 136,000
Other long term assets 4,956
Net unfavorable leases (9,360 )
Current liabilities (74,488 )
Other long term liabilities⁽²⁾
(229,957 )

Total $ 1,048,673


	Year ended December 31,
	2007			2008			2009
Numerator:
Net income (loss) attributable to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.	$	88,920		$	(48,325	)	$	97,108
(Earnings) loss allocated to participating share-based awards⁽¹⁾		(3	)		129			(635	)

Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	$	88,917		$	(48,196	)	$	96,473


Denominator(shares in thousands):
Basic weighted average common stock outstanding		102,177			107,341			108,563
Common equivalent shares for stock options⁽²⁾		2,543			—			1,594
Common equivalent shares for restricted stock units⁽²⁾		—			—			98

Diluted		104,720			107,341			110,255


Basic earnings (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders	$	0.87		$	(0.45	)	$	0.89

Diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders	$	0.85		$	(0.45	)	$	0.87


⁽¹⁾		~~Includes cash~~For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, a weighted average of ~~$7,290.~~approximately 5 shares, 287 shares and 714 shares of unvested restricted stock, respectively, are considered participating securities.

⁽²⁾		~~In 2007,~~Diluted loss per share calculations for the ~~Company adjusted its preliminary purchase price allocation to fixed assets (increase~~year ended December 31, 2008 exclude common equivalent shares for stock options of ~~$29,398), goodwill (decrease~~1,971 and common equivalent shares for restricted stock units of ~~$18,110) and other long-term liabilities (increase of $11,288) due to additional information obtained regarding the fair value of these assets and liabilities acquired.~~47 because they were anti-dilutive.

~~The tradename and net unfavorable leases are presented as intangible assets on~~5. DIVIDENDS

In August 2007, the Company initiated a quarterly dividend policy. Below is a summary of the Company’s ~~consolidated balance sheets as~~dividend history since initiation of December 31, 2006 and 2007. Goodwill represents the excess of the costs of acquiring Century over amounts assigned to assets acquired, including identifiable intangible assets, and liabilities assumed. The goodwill recorded as a result of the Century Acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes.this policy:


					Amount per
Date	Date of		Date		Common		Total
Declared	Record		Paid		Share ⁽¹⁾		Dividends ⁽²⁾
08/13/07		09/04/07		09/18/07	$	0.13	$	13,840
11/12/07		12/03/07		12/18/07	$	0.18	$	19,221

Total - 2007							$	33,061


02/26/08		03/06/08		03/14/08	$	0.18	$	19,270
05/09/08		05/30/08		06/12/08	$	0.18	$	19,353
08/07/08		08/25/08		09/12/08	$	0.18	$	19,370
11/06/08		11/26/08		12/11/08	$	0.18	$	19,615

Total - 2008							$	77,608


02/13/09		03/05/09		03/20/09	$	0.18	$	19,619
05/13/09		06/02/09		06/18/09	$	0.18	$	19,734
07/29/09		08/17/09		09/01/09	$	0.18	$	19,739
11/04/09		11/25/09		12/10/09	$	0.18	$	19,752

Total - 2009							$	78,844


⁽¹⁾		The dividend paid on September 18, 2007 was based on a quarterly dividend rate of $0.18 per common share, prorated based on the April 24, 2007 closing date of the Company’s initial public offering.

⁽²⁾		Of the dividends recorded during 2008 and 2009, $74 and $201, respectively, were related to outstanding restricted stock units and will not be paid until such units vest. See Notes 19 and 20.

6. ACQUISITION OF U.S. THEATRES

On ~~October 5, 2006,~~March 18, 2009, the Company ~~entered into a senior secured credit facility, which provided~~acquired four theatres with 82 screens from Muvico Entertainment L.L.C. in an asset purchase for ~~a $1,120,000 term loan and a $150,000 revolving credit line.~~$48,950 in cash. The ~~net proceeds~~acquisition resulted in an expansion of the ~~new term loan were used to fund a portion~~Company’s U.S. theatre base, as three of the ~~$531,225 cash portion of the purchase price, to pay off approximately $360,000 under Century’s existing senior credit facility~~theatres are located in Florida and ~~to refinance amounts under the Company’s existing senior secured credit facility of approximately $253,500.~~one theatre is located in Maryland. The Company ~~used~~incurred approximately ~~$53,000 of its existing cash to fund the payment of the remaining portion of the purchase price and related~~$113 in transaction ~~expenses. Additionally, the Company advanced approximately $17,000 of cash to Century to satisfy working capital obligations. See Note 13 for further discussion of long-term debt.~~

~~The Century Acquisition is~~costs, which are reflected in general and administrative expenses on the ~~Company’s~~ consolidated ~~statements~~statement of operations for the ~~period subsequent to the transaction date and is reported in the Company’s U.S. operating segment. The pro forma financial~~year ended December 31, 2009.

F-14

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In thousands, except share and per share data

~~information~~ The transaction was accounted for by applying the acquisition method. The following table represents the fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed that have been recognized by the Company in its consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009:


Theatre properties and equipment	$	25,575
Brandname		3,500
Noncompete agreement		1,630
Goodwill		44,565
Unfavorable lease		(3,600	)
Capital lease liability (for one theatre)		(22,720	)

Total	$	48,950

The brandname and noncompete agreement are presented ~~below sets forth~~as intangible assets and the unfavorable lease is presented as other long-term liabilities on the Company’s ~~pro forma~~ consolidated ~~statements~~balance sheet as of ~~operations for the years ended~~ December 31, ~~2005~~2009. The weighted average amortization period for these intangible assets and ~~2006~~the unfavorable lease are 9.6 years and 10.0 years, respectively. Goodwill represents excess of the costs of acquiring these theatres over amounts assigned to ~~give effect to the Century Acquisition as if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of each period. This information~~assets acquired, including intangible assets, and liabilities assumed. The goodwill recorded is ~~presented~~fully deductible for comparative purposes only and does not purport to represent what the Company’s results of operations would have been had the transaction occurred on the date indicated or to project its results of operations for any future period.tax purposes.

Pro Forma Pro Forma
Year Ended Year Ended
December 31, 2005 December 31, 2006
(unaudited)
Revenues
Admissions $ 982,699 $ 1,029,881
Concession 457,190 487,416
Other 74,559 94,807

Total revenues $ 1,514,448 $ 1,612,104
Cost of operations
Film rentals and advertising 526,002 546,144
Concession supplies 72,631 75,359
Salaries and wages 154,072 160,689
Facility lease expense 194,394 206,950
Utilities and other 169,507 184,699
General and administrative expenses⁽¹⁾
77,338 84,619
Depreciation and amortization⁽²⁾⁽³⁾
140,994 141,416
Impairment of long-lived assets 51,677 28,943
Loss on sale of assets and other 9,393 7,706

Total cost of operations 1,396,008 1,436,525
Operating income 118,440 175,579
Interest expense⁽⁴⁾
(162,131 ) (168,051 )
Other income (expense) 6,105 (4,556 )

Income (loss) before income taxes (37,586 ) 2,972
Income taxes⁽⁵⁾
2,176 6,520

Net loss $ (39,762 ) $ (3,548 )

Basic and diluted net loss per share $ (0.43 ) $ (0.04 )


⁽¹⁾		~~Gives effect to the elimination of change of control payments of $15,672 to Century’s management for the year ended December 31, 2006.~~

⁽²⁾		~~Reflects increase in depreciation related to the fair value of the theatre properties and equipment pursuant to purchase accounting for the Century Acquisition.~~

⁽³⁾		~~Reflects the amortization associated with intangible assets recorded pursuant to purchase accounting for the Century Acquisition.~~

⁽⁴⁾		~~Reflects interest expense and amortization of debt issue costs resulting from the changes to the Company’s debt structure pursuant to the Century Acquisition.~~

⁽⁵⁾		~~Reflects the tax effect of the aforementioned proforma adjustments at the Company’s statutory income tax rate of 39%.~~

7. INVESTMENT IN NATIONAL CINEMEDIA LLC AND TRANSACTION RELATED TO ITS INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING

In March 2005, Regal Entertainment Inc. (“Regal”) and AMC Entertainment Inc. (“AMC”) formed National CineMedia, LLC, or “NCM”, and on July 15, 2005, the Company joined NCM, as one of the founding members. NCM operates ~~the largest~~a digital in-theatre network in the U.S. for providing cinema advertising and non-film ~~events and combines the cinema advertising and non-film events businesses of the three largest motion picture companies in the U.S.~~events. Upon joining NCM, the Company and NCM entered into an Exhibitor Services Agreement, pursuant to which NCM provides advertising, promotion and event services to the Company’s theatres. On February 13, 2007, National CineMedia, Inc., or ~~NCM~~“NCM Inc.”, a newly formed entity that ~~now~~ serves as a member and the sole manager of NCM, completed an initial public offering of its common stock. In connection with the NCM Inc. initial public offering, the

~~F-15~~

~~CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~In thousands, except share and per share data~~

Company amended its operating agreement with NCM and the Exhibitor Services ~~Agreement pursuant to which NCM provides advertising, promotion and event services to the Company’s theatres.~~Agreement. In connection with NCM Inc.’s initial public offering and the transactions described below (the “NCM Transaction”), the Company received an aggregate of $389,003.

Prior to pricing the initial public offering of NCM Inc., NCM completed a recapitalization whereby (1) each issued and outstanding Class A unit of NCM was split into 44,291 Class A units, and (2) following such split of Class A Units, each issued and outstanding Class A Unit was recapitalized into one common unit and one preferred unit. As a result, the Company received 14,159,437 common units and 14,159,437 preferred units. All existing preferred units of NCM, or 55,850,951 preferred units, held by Regal, AMC and the Company were redeemed on a pro-rata basis on February 13, 2007. NCM utilized the proceeds of its new $725,000 term loan facility and a portion of the proceeds it received from NCM Inc. from its initial public offering to redeem all of its outstanding preferred units. Each preferred unit was redeemed for $13.7782 and the Company received approximately $195,092 as payment in full for redemption of all of the Company’s preferred units in NCM. Upon payment of such amount, each preferred unit was cancelled and the holders of the preferred units ceased to have any rights with respect to the preferred units.

At the closing of the initial public offering, the underwriters exercised their over-allotment option to purchase additional shares of common stock of NCM Inc. at the initial public offering price, less underwriting discounts and commissions. In connection with the over-allotment option exercise, Regal, AMC and the Company each sold to NCM Inc. common units of NCM on a pro-rata basis at the initial public offering price, less underwriting discounts and expenses. The Company sold 1,014,088 common units to NCM Inc. for proceeds of $19,910, and upon completion of this sale of common units, the Company owned 13,145,349 common units of NCM. The net proceeds of $215,002 from the above described stock transactions were applied against the Company’s existing investment basis in NCM of $4,069 until such basis was reduced to $0 with the remaining $210,933 of proceeds net of $160 of transaction related costs, recorded as a gain of $210,773 in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2007.

NCM also paid the Company a portion of the proceeds it received from NCM Inc. in the initial public offering for agreeing to modify ~~NCM’s payment obligation under~~ the prior Exhibitor Services Agreement. The modification ~~agreed to by the Company~~ reflects a shift from circuit share expense under the prior Exhibitor Services Agreement, which obligated NCM to pay the Company a percentage of revenue, to the monthly theatre access fee described below. The theatre access fee ~~will~~ significantly ~~reduce~~reduced the contractual amounts paid to

F-15

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In thousands, except share and per share data

the Company by NCM. In exchange for the Company agreeing to so modify the agreement, NCM paid the Company approximately $174,001 upon modification of the Exhibitor Services Agreement on February 13, 2007, the proceeds of which were recorded as deferred ~~revenue on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.~~revenue. The Company believes this payment approximates the fair value of the Exhibitor Services Agreement modification. The deferred revenue is being amortized into other revenues over the life of the agreement using the units of revenue method. Regal and AMC similarly amended their exhibitor service agreements with NCM.

In consideration for NCM’s exclusive access to the Company’s theatre attendees for on-screen advertising and use of off-screen locations within the Company’s theatres for the lobby entertainment ~~network~~ and lobby promotions, the Company ~~will receive~~receives a monthly theatre access fee under the modified Exhibitor Services ~~Agreement.~~Agreement (“modified ESA”). The theatre access fee is composed of a fixed payment per patron, initially seven cents, and a fixed payment per digital screen, which may be adjusted for certain ~~enumerated reasons.~~reasons outlined in the modified ESA. The payment per theatre patron ~~will increase~~increases by 8% every five years, with the first such increase taking effect after the end of fiscal 2011, and the payment per digital screen, initially eight hundred dollars per digital screen per year, ~~will increase~~increases annually by 5%~~, beginning after 2007.~~. For 2009, the annual payment per digital screen was eight hundred eighty two dollars. The theatre access fee paid in the aggregate to Regal, AMC and the Company will not be less than 12% of NCM’s Aggregate Advertising Revenue (as defined in the ~~Exhibitor Services Agreement)~~modified ESA), or it will be adjusted upward to reach this minimum payment. Additionally, with respect to any on-screen advertising time provided to the Company’s beverage concessionaire, the Company is required to purchase such time from NCM at a negotiated rate. The ~~Exhibitor Services Agreement~~modified ESA has, except with respect to certain limited services, a remaining term of 30approximately 28 years.

Prior to the initial public offering of NCM Inc. common stock, the Company’s ownership interest in NCM was approximately 25% and subsequent to the completion of the offering the Company held a 14% interest in NCM. Subsequent to NCM Inc.’s initial public offering, the Company continues to account for its investment in NCM under the equity method of accounting due to its ability to exercise significant ~~control~~influence over NCM. The Company has substantial

~~F-16~~

~~CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~In thousands, except share and per share data~~

rights as a founding member, including the right to designate a total of two nominees to the ten-member board of directors of NCM Inc., the sole manager. So long as the Company owns at least 5% of NCM’s membership interests, approval of at least 90% (80% if the board has less than 10 directors) will be required before NCM Inc. may take certain actions including but not limited to mergers and acquisitions, issuance of common or preferred shares, approval of NCM Inc.’s budget, incurrence of indebtedness, entering into or terminating material agreements, and modifications to its articles of incorporation or bylaws. Additionally, if any of the Company’s director designees are not appointed to the board of directors of NCM Inc., nominated by NCM Inc. or elected by NCM Inc.’s stockholders, then the Company (so long as the Company continues to own at least 5% of NCM’s membership interest) will be entitled to approve certain actions of NCM including without limitation, approval of the budget, incurrence of indebtedness, consummating or amending material agreements, approving dividends, amending the NCM operating agreement, hiring or termination of the chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief technology officer or chief marketing officer of NCM and the dissolution or liquidation of NCM.

During 2008, NCM performed its initial annual common unit adjustment calculation in accordance with the ~~years ended December 31, 2005, 2006~~Common Unit Adjustment Agreement dated as of February 13, 2007 between NCM, Inc. and ~~2007,~~ the Company, ~~recorded equity losses~~Regal and AMC. The annual common unit adjustment is based on the change in the number of ~~$0, $1,705~~screens operated by and ~~$1,284, respectively. The~~attendance of the Company, ~~recognized $72, $29,388~~AMC and ~~$5,664~~Regal. As a result of ~~other revenue from NCM during~~ the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. The Company had a receivable due from NCM of $13,386 and $225 as of December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively, related to screen advertising and other ancillary revenue. The Company is entitled to receive mandatory quarterly distributions of excess cash from NCM. During the year ended December 31, 2007,calculation, the Company received distributions of approximately $11,499 which were in excess of the carrying value of its investment in NCM and are reflected as distributions from NCM on the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2007.

~~As of December 31, 2007, the Company owned 13,145,349~~an additional 846,303 common units of ~~NCM. Each common unit~~NCM, each of which is convertible into one share of NCM, Inc. common stock. The Company recorded the additional common units received at fair value as an investment with a corresponding adjustment to deferred revenue of $19,020. The common unit adjustment resulted in an increase in the Company’s ownership percentage in NCM from approximately 14.0% to approximately 14.5%. Subsequent to the annual common unit adjustment discussed above, in May 2008, Regal completed an acquisition of another theatre circuit that required an extraordinary common unit adjustment calculation by NCM in accordance with the Common Unit Adjustment Agreement. As a result of ~~December 31, 2007, the fair market value~~this extraordinary common unit adjustment, Regal was granted additional common units of NCM, which resulted in dilution of the Company’s ~~shares~~ownership interest in NCM ~~was~~from 14.5% to 14.1%. The Company recognized a change of interest loss of approximately ~~$331,394 based~~$75 during the year ended December 31, 2008 as a result of this extraordinary common unit adjustment, which is reflected in (gain) loss on sale of assets and other on the consolidated statement of operations.

During March 2009, NCM performed its annual common unit adjustment calculation under the Common Unit Adjustment Agreement. As a ~~closing price~~result of ~~$25.21 per~~the calculation, the Company received an additional 1,197,303 common units of NCM, each of which is convertible into one share of NCM, Inc. common ~~stock on~~stock. The Company recorded the additional common units received at fair value as an investment with a corresponding adjustment to deferred revenue of $15,536.

F-16

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In thousands, except share and per share data

The common unit adjustment resulted in an increase in the Company’s ownership percentage in NCM from approximately 14.1% to 15.0%.

As of December 31, ~~2007.~~2009, the Company owned a total of 15,188,955 common units of NCM.

Below is a summary of activity with NCM included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements:


							Gain						Equity in
	Investment			Deferred			on NCM			Distributions			(Earnings)			Other			Cash
	in NCM			Revenue			Transaction⁽²⁾			from NCM			Losses			Revenue			Received

Beginning balance on January 1, 2007	$	5,353		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Equity in losses		(1,284	)		—			—			—			1,284			—			—
Preferred and common unit redemption		(4,069	)		—			(210,773	)		—			—			—			215,002
ESA modification payment		—			(174,001	)		—			—			—			—			174,001
Revenues earned under ESA⁽¹⁾		—			—			—			—			—			(5,664	)		5,664
Amortization of deferred revenue		—			1,305			—			—			—			(1,305	)		—
Receipt of excess cash distributions		—			—			—			(11,499	)		—			—			11,499

Balance as of and for the period ended December 31, 2007	$	—		$	(172,696	)	$	(210,773	)	$	(11,499	)	$	1,284		$	(6,969	)	$	406,166

Receipt of common units due to 2008 common unit adjustment	$	19,020		$	(19,020	)	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Change of interest loss due to extraordinary common unit adjustment⁽³⁾		(75	)		—			—			—			—			—			—
Revenues earned under ESA⁽¹⁾		—			—			—			—			—			(1,764	)		1,764
Receipt of excess cash distributions		(644	)		—			—			(16,005	)		—			—			16,649
Receipt under tax receivable agreement		—			—			—			(2,833	)		—			—			2,833
Equity in earnings		840			—			—			—			(840	)		—			—
Amortization of deferred revenue		—			1,869			—			—			—			(1,869	)		—

Balance as of and for the period ended December 31, 2008	$	19,141		$	(189,847	)	$	—		$	(18,838	)	$	(840	)	$	(3,633	)	$	21,246

Receipt of common units due to 2009 common unit adjustment	$	15,536		$	(15,536	)	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Revenues earned under ESA⁽¹⁾		—			—			—			—			—			(5,711	)		5,711
Receipt of excess cash distributions		(2,358	)		—			—			(17,738	)		—			—			20,096
Receipt under tax receivable agreement		—			—			—			(3,084	)		—			—			3,084
Equity in earnings		1,913			—			—			—			(1,913	)		—			—
Amortization of deferred revenue		—			2,377			—			—			—			(2,377	)		—

Balance as of and for the period ended December 31, 2009	$	34,232		$	(203,006	)	$	—		$	(20,822	)	$	(1,913	)	$	(8,088	)	$	28,891


⁽¹⁾		Amounts include the per patron and per digital screen theatre access fees due to the Company, net of amounts due to NCM for on-screen advertising time provided to the Company’s beverage concessionaire. The amounts due to NCM for on-screen advertising time provided to the Company’s beverage concessionaire were approximately $10,367, $12,784 and $9,719 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.

⁽²⁾		Amount is net of approximately $160 of costs incurred by the Company related to the NCM transaction.

⁽³⁾		Loss was recorded as (gain) loss on sale of assets and other.

8. INVESTMENT IN DIGITAL CINEMA IMPLEMENTATION PARTNERS

On February 12, 2007, the Company, AMC and Regal entered into a joint venture known as Digital Cinema Implementation Partners LLC (“DCIP”) to facilitate the implementation of digital cinema in the Company’s theatres and to establish agreements with major motion picture studios for the financing of digital cinema. Future digital cinema developments will be managed by DCIP, subject to the Company’s approval along with the Company’s partners, AMC and Regal. During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company invested an initial $1,500 for a one-third ownership interest in DCIP. The Company, AMC and Regal each invested an additional $4,000 and $2,500 during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009, respectively, in DCIP. The Company is accounting for its investment in DCIP under the equity method of accounting.

During the ~~year~~years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, the Company recorded equity losses in DCIP of approximately $1,240, $3,243 and $2,877, respectively, relating to this investment. The Company’s investment basis in DCIP was ~~$260~~$1,017 and $640 at December 31, ~~2007,~~2008 and 2009, respectively, which is included in investments in and advances to affiliates on the consolidated balance ~~sheet.~~sheets.

F-17

~~CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~In thousands, except share and per share data~~

deferred revenue on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet and are being amortized straight-line over the term of the amended ticketing and distribution agreement, which expires in December 2011.

In accordance with the terms of its senior secured credit facility, the Company used approximately $9,914 of the net proceeds to pay down its term loan. The payment was made on August 10, 2007 and was applied against the current portion of long-term debt.

10. SHARE EXCHANGES WITH NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS

During May 2008, the Company’s partners in Central America (the “Central American Partners”) exercised an option available to them under an Exchange Option Agreement dated February 7, 2007 between the Company and the Central American Partners. Under this option, which was contingent upon completion of an initial public offering of common stock by the Company, the Central American Partners were entitled to exchange their shares in Cinemark Equity Holdings Corporation, which is the Company’s Central American holding company, for shares of the Company’s common stock. The number of shares to be exchanged was determined based on the Company’s equity value and the equity value of the Central American Partner’s interest in Cinemark Equity Holdings Corporation, both of which are defined in the Exchange Option Agreement. As a result of this exchange on October 1, 2008, the Company issued 902,981 shares of its common stock to its Central American Partners (the “Central America Share Exchange”). As a result of this transaction, the Company owns 100% of the shares in Cinemark Equity Holdings Corporation.

The Company accounted for the transaction as a step acquisition. The purchase price of the shares in Cinemark Equity Holdings Corporation was recorded based on the fair value of the shares issued by the Company of $12,949 plus related transaction costs of $2, which totaled approximately $12,951. The following table represents the allocation of purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed:


Net unfavorable leases	$	(443	)
Vendor contract		1,034
Tradename		892
Goodwill		8,222
Reduction of noncontrolling interest		3,246

	$	12,951

The net book values of fixed assets approximated fair value. The net unfavorable leases, vendor contracts and tradename are presented as intangible assets on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The goodwill recorded as a result of the acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes.

During July 2008, the Company’s partners in Ecuador (the “Ecuador Partners”) exercised an option available to them under an Exchange Option Agreement dated April 24, 2007 between the Company and the Ecuador Partners. Under this option, which was contingent upon completion of an initial public offering of common stock by the Company, the Ecuador Partners were entitled to exchange their shares in Cinemark del Ecuador S.A. for shares of the Company’s common stock. The number of shares to be exchanged was determined based on the Company’s equity value and the equity value of the Ecuador Partner’s interest in Cinemark del Ecuador S.A., both of which are defined in the Exchange Option Agreement. As a result of this exchange on November 6, 2008, the Company issued 393,615 shares of its common stock to its Ecuador partners (the “Ecuador Share Exchange”). As a result of this transaction, the Company owns 100% of the shares of Cinemark del Ecuador S.A.

F-18

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In thousands, except share and per share data

The Company accounted for the transaction as a step acquisition. The purchase price of the shares in Cinemark del Ecuador S.A. was recorded based on the fair value of the shares issued by the Company, which was approximately $3,200.

The following table represents the allocation of purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed:


Net unfavorable leases	$	(161	)
Tradename		313
Goodwill		1,473
Reduction of noncontrolling interest		1,575

	$	3,200

The net book value of fixed assets approximated fair value. The net unfavorable leases and tradename are presented as intangible assets on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The goodwill recorded as a result of the acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes.

11. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS — NET

The Company’s goodwill iswas as follows:

U.S. International
Operating Operating
Segment Segment Total
Balance at January 1, 2006 $ 401,397 $ 150,140 $ 551,537
Acquisition of Century Theatres, Inc.⁽¹⁾
658,546 — 658,546
Impairment charges (5,116 ) (8,478 ) (13,594 )
Foreign currency translation adjustments and other⁽²⁾
1,989 6,945 8,934

Balance at December 31, 2006 $ 1,056,816 $ 148,607 $ 1,205,423
Purchase price allocation adjustment for Century Acquisition⁽¹⁾
(18,109 ) — (18,109 )
Impairment charges (60,154 ) (7,571 ) (67,725 )
Foreign currency translation adjustment and other⁽²⁾
595 14,505 15,100

Balance at December 31, 2007 $ 979,148 $ 155,541 $ 1,134,689


	U.S.			International
	Operating			Operating
	Segment			Segment			Total
Balance at January 1, 2008⁽¹⁾	$	979,148		$	155,541		$	1,134,689
Impairment charges		(78,579	)		—			(78,579	)
Acquisition of one U.S. theatre⁽²⁾		2,892			—			2,892
Acquisition of two Brazil theatres⁽³⁾		—			2,247			2,247
Central America share exchange⁽⁴⁾		—			8,222			8,222
Ecuador share exchange⁽⁴⁾		—			1,473			1,473
Foreign currency translation adjustments		—			(31,126	)		(31,126	)

Balance at December 31, 2008⁽⁷⁾	$	903,461		$	136,357		$	1,039,818
Acquisition of four U.S. theatres⁽⁵⁾		44,565			—			44,565
Acquisition of one Brazil theatre⁽⁶⁾		—			6,270			6,270
Foreign currency translation adjustments and other		—			25,649			25,649

Balance at December 31, 2009⁽⁷⁾	$	948,026		$	168,276		$	1,116,302


⁽¹⁾		~~See Note 6 regarding~~Balances are presented net of accumulated impairment losses of $135,452 for the ~~acquisition of Century Theatres, Inc.~~ U.S. operating segment and $27,622 for the international operating segment.

⁽²⁾		The Company acquired one theatre in the U.S. during 2008 for approximately $5,011, which resulted in an allocation of $2,892 to goodwill and $2,119 to theatre properties and equipment.

⁽³⁾		The Company acquired two theatres in Brazil during 2008 for approximately $5,100 which resulted in an allocation of $2,247 to goodwill, $2,368 to theatre properties and equipment, and $485 to intangible assets.

⁽⁴⁾		See Note 10.

⁽⁵⁾		See Note 6.

⁽⁶⁾		The Company acquired one theatre in Brazil during 2009 for approximately $9,061 which resulted in a preliminary allocation of $6,270 to goodwill, $2,130 to theatre properties and equipment and $661 to other current assets and liabilities.

⁽⁷⁾		Balances are presented net of accumulated impairment losses of $214,031 for the U.S. operating segment ~~includes one theatre located in Canada.~~and $27,622 for the international operating segment.

~~In accordance with SFAS No. 142, “~~~~Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets~~”,The goodwill impairment charges taken during the Company reviews goodwill for impairment on an annual basis at fiscal year-end or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill might exceed its estimated fair value.

Asyear ended December 31, 2008 were primarily a result of the ~~NCM Transaction discussed~~Company’s determination that the multiple used to estimate the fair value of its reporting units should be reduced to reflect the dramatic decline in ~~Note 7,~~market values that resulted from significant decreases in the Company’s stock price and ~~more specifically~~ the ~~modification~~declines in the market capitalizations of the ~~NCM Exhibitor Services Agreement with~~Company and its competitors that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2008. The Company reduced the multiple from eight times cash flows to six and a half times cash flows, which significantly reduced the contractual amounts paid to the Company, the Company evaluated the carrying value of its goodwill as of March 31, 2007 resulting in the majority of the 2007 goodwill impairment charges reflected above in the table. The Company also performed its annual evaluation as of December 31, 2007.

The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level (generally a theatre) and has allocated goodwill to the reporting unit based on an estimate of its relative fair value. The evaluation is a two-step approach requiring the Company to compute theCompany’s estimated fair value of a theatre and compare it with its carrying value. If the carrying value exceeds estimated fair value, a second step is performed to measure the potential goodwill impairment. Fair values are determined based on a multiple of cash flows, which was seven times for 2005 and eight times for the evaluations performed during 2006 and 2007. Significant judgment is involved in estimating cash flows and fair value. Management’s estimates are based on historical and projected operating performance as well as recent market transactions. The Company’s policy of allocating goodwill at the theatre level results in more volatile impairment charges on an annual basis due to changes in market conditions and box office performance and the resulting impact on individual theatres.values.

~~F-18~~F-19

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In thousands, except share and per share data

As of December 31, intangible assets-net, consisted of the following:


												Foreign
												Currency
												Translation
	Balance at											Adjustments			Balance at			December 31,												December 31,
	December 31,											and			December 31,			2007			Additions⁽¹⁾			Amortization			Other⁽³⁾			2008
	2006			Additions		Amortization			Impairment			Other			2007
Intangible assets with finite lives:
Capitalized licensing fees:
Gross carrying amount	$	5,138			—		—			—			—		$	5,138
Accumulated amortization		(1,139	)		—		(426	)		—			—			(1,565	)

Net carrying amount	$	3,999		$	—	$	(426	)	$	—		$	—		$	3,573

Vendor contracts:
Gross carrying amount		56,526			—		—			—			447			56,973
Accumulated amortization		(19,924	)		—		(3,418	)		—			—			(23,342	)

Net carrying amount	$	36,602		$	—	$	(3,418	)	$	—		$	447		$	33,631

Net favorable leases:
Gross carrying amount		21,999			—		—			(4,611	)		3,303			20,691		$	56,973		$	1,519		$	—		$	(2,652	)	$	55,840
Accumulated amortization		(12,023	)		—		(2,935	)		—			(623	)		(15,581	)		(23,342	)		—			(3,322	)		—			(26,664	)

Net carrying amount	$	9,976		$	—	$	(2,935	)	$	(4,611	)	$	2,680		$	5,110			33,631			1,519			(3,322	)		(2,652	)		29,176

Other intangible assets:
Gross carrying amount		70			—		—			—			(1	)		69			25,898			(604	)		—			(2,438	)		22,856
Accumulated amortization		(16	)		—		(4	)		—			—			(20	)		(17,166	)		—			(3,138	)		938			(19,366	)

Net carrying amount	$	54		$	—	$	(4	)	$	—		$	(1	)	$	49			8,732			(604	)		(3,138	)		(1,500	)		3,490

Total net intangible assets with finite lives	$	50,631		$	—	$	(6,783	)	$	(4,611	)	$	3,126		$	42,363			42,363			915			(6,460	)		(4,152	)		32,666
Intangible assets with indefinite lives:
Tradename		310,118			—		—			—			563			310,681
Other unamortized intangible assets		3			—		—			—			—			3
Tradename and other																			310,684			1,205			—			(2,787	)		309,102

Total intangible assets — net	$	360,752		$	—	$	(6,783	)	$	(4,611	)	$	3,689		$	353,047		$	353,047		$	2,120		$	(6,460	)	$	(6,939	)	$	341,768

~~CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~In thousands, except share and per share data~~


For the year ended December 31, 2010	$	5,519
For the year ended December 31, 2011		5,279
For the year ended December 31, 2012		5,123
For the year ended December 31, 2013		4,377
For the year ended December 31, 2014		3,831
Thereafter		8,389

Total	$	32,518

~~11.~~12. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS

~~In accordance with SFAS No. 144, “~~~~Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets~~~~,” the~~The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment indicators on a quarterly basis or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable.

The Company considers actual theatre level cash flows, future years budgeted theatre level cash flows, theatre property and equipment carrying values, theatre goodwill carrying values, amortizing intangible assets carrying values, the age of a recently built theatre, competitive theatres in the marketplace, changes in foreign currency exchange rates, the impact of recent ticket price changes, available lease renewal options and other factors in its assessment of impairment of individual theatre assets. Long-lived assets are evaluated See Note 1 for impairment on an individual theatre basis, which the Company believes is the lowest applicable level for which there are identifiable cash flows. The impairment evaluation is based on the estimated cash flows from continuing use through the remainderdiscussion of the theatre’s useful life. The remainder of the useful life correlates with the available remaining lease period, which includes the probability of renewal periods for leased properties and a period of twenty years for fee owned properties. If the estimated cash flows are not sufficient to recover a long-lived asset’s carrying value, the Company then compares the carrying value of the asset group (theatre) with its estimated fair value. Fair value is determined based on a multiple of cash flows, which was seven times for 2005 and eight times for the evaluations performed during 2006 and 2007. When estimated fair value is determined to be lower than the carrying value of the asset group (theatre), the asset group (theatre) is written down to its estimated fair value. Significant judgment is involved in estimating cash flows and fair value. Management’s estimates are based on historical and projected operating performance as well as recent market transactions.

~~The~~ Company’s ~~long-lived asset~~ impairment ~~losses are summarized in the following table:~~

Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended
December 31, December 31, December 31,
2005 2006 2007
United States theatre properties $ 5,626 $ 9,467 $ 12,423
International theatre properties 750 4,142 1,799

Subtotal $ 6,376 $ 13,609 $ 14,222
Intangible assets (see Note 10) — 1,334 4,611
Goodwill (see Note 10) 45,301 13,594 67,725

Impairment of long-lived assets $ 51,677 $ 28,537 $ 86,558

As a result of the NCM Transaction discussed in Note 7, and more specifically the modification of the NCM Exhibitor Services Agreement with the Company, which significantly reduced the contractual amounts paid to the Company, the Company evaluated the carrying value of its goodwill as of March 31, 2007 resulting in the majority of the 2007 goodwill impairment charges reflected above in the table.

~~12. DEFERRED CHARGES AND OTHER ASSETS — NET~~

~~As of December 31, deferred charges and other assets — net consisted of the following:~~

Balance at Balance at
December 31, 2006 December 31, 2007
Debt issue costs $ 39,646 $ 37,660
Less: Accumulated amortization (4,794 ) (9,522 )

Subtotal 34,852 28,138
Long-term prepaid rents 16,283 17,457
Construction advances and other deposits 1,869 24,080
Equipment to be placed in service 3,990 4,821
Brazil value added tax deposit 3,943 409
Other 2,155 2,488

Total $ 63,092 $ 77,393

evaluation.

F-20

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In thousands, except share and per share data

The Company’s long-lived asset impairment losses are summarized in the following table:


	Year Ended December 31,
	2007		2008		2009

United States theatre properties	$	12,423	$	27,761	$	10,013
International theatre properties		1,799		6,869		1,340

Subtotal	$	14,222	$	34,630	$	11,353
Intangible assets (see Note 11)		4,611		323		358
Goodwill (see Note 11)		67,725		78,579		—
Equity investment		—		—		147

Impairment of long-lived assets	$	86,558	$	113,532	$	11,858

The long-lived asset impairment charges recorded during each of the years presented are specific to theatres that were directly and individually impacted by increased competition, adverse changes in market demographics or adverse changes in the development or the conditions of the areas surrounding the theatre.

13. DEFERRED CHARGES AND OTHER ASSETS — NET

As of December 31, deferred charges and other assets — net consisted of the following:


	December 31,
	2008			2009
Debt issue costs	$	37,422		$	37,334
Less: Accumulated amortization		(14,218	)		(12,210	)

Subtotal		23,204			25,124
Long-term prepaid rents		16,833			15,426
Construction advances and other deposits		1,677			3,171
Equipment to be placed in service		5,413			6,454
Other		1,906			2,327

Total	$	49,033		$	52,502

During the year ended December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, the Company ~~incurred new~~paid debt issue costs of ~~$244~~$12,722 related to the issuance of the 8⁵/8% senior notes and $281 related to its senior secured credit facility and wrote off ~~$794~~approximately $6,337 of unamortized debt issue costs ~~related to its repurchase of $332,066 aggregate principal amount of its 9% senior subordinated notes and $1,437 of~~($13,120 gross debt issue costs less $6,783 of accumulated amortization) related to ~~its~~the repurchase ~~of $69,155 aggregate principal amount at maturity~~ of its 9³/4% senior discount notes. See Note 14.

~~13.~~14. LONG-TERM DEBT

~~Long-term debt as of December 31 consisted of the following:~~

Balance at Balance at
December 31, 2006 December 31, 2007

Cinemark, Inc. 9³/4% senior discount notes due 2014
$ 434,073 $ 415,768
Cinemark USA, Inc. term loan 1,117,200 1,101,686
Cinemark USA, Inc. 9% senior subordinated notes due 2013 350,820 184
Other long-term debt 9,560 6,107

Total long-term debt 1,911,653 1,523,745
Less current portion 14,259 9,166

Long-term debt, less current portion $ 1,897,394 $ 1,514,579

~~Senior Discount Notes~~

~~On March 31, 2004, in connection with the MDP merger, Cinemark, Inc. issued approximately $577,173 aggregate principal amount at maturity of 9~~³/4% senior discount notes due 2014. Interest on the notes accretes until March 15, 2009 up to their aggregate principal amount. Cash interest will accrue and be payable semi-annually in arrears on March 15 and September 15, commencing on September 15, 2009. Due to Cinemark, Inc.’s holding company status, payments of principal and interest under these notes will be dependent on loans, dividends and other payments from its subsidiaries. Cinemark, Inc. may redeem all or part of the 9³/4~~% senior discount notes on or after March 15, 2009.~~

~~On September 22, 2005, Cinemark, Inc. repurchased $1,840 aggregate principal amount at maturity of its 9~~³/4% senior discount notes as part of an open market purchase for approximately $1,302 including accreted interest. During May 2006, as part of four open market purchases, Cinemark, Inc. repurchased $39,775 aggregate principal amount at maturity of its 9³/4% senior discount notes for approximately $31,745, including accreted interest of $5,381 and a cash premium of $1,414. Cinemark, Inc. funded these transactions with available cash from its operations. The Company recorded a loss on early retirement of debt of $46 and $2,375 during the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively, related to the repurchases noted above, which included premiums paid and the write-off of unamortized debt issue costs.

~~During July and August 2007, Cinemark, Inc. repurchased in six open market purchases a total of $47,000 aggregate principal amount at maturity of its 9~~³/4% senior discount notes for approximately $42,758, including accreted interest of $10,932 and a cash premium of $2,495. During November 2007, Cinemark, Inc. repurchased in one open market purchase $22,155 aggregate principal amount at maturity of its 9³/4% senior discount notes for approximately $20,936 including accreted interest of $5,660 and a cash premium of $1,472. Cinemark, Inc. funded these transactions with proceeds from the Company’s initial public offering. The Company recorded a loss on early retirement of debt of $5,504 during the year ended December 31, 2007, related to the 2007 repurchases noted above, which consisted of premiums paid, other fees and the write-off of unamortized debt issue costs.

As of December 31, ~~2007, the accreted principal balance~~long-term debt consisted of the ~~notes was approximately $415,768 and the aggregate principal amount at maturity was approximately $466,403.~~ following:

~~The indenture governing the 9~~³/4% senior discount notes contains covenants that limit, among other things, dividends, transactions with affiliates, investments, sales of assets, mergers, repurchases of Cinemark, Inc.’s capital stock, liens and additional indebtedness. The dividend restriction contained in the indenture prevents Cinemark, Inc. from paying a dividend or otherwise distributing cash to its stockholders unless (1) it is not in default, and the distribution would not cause it to be in default, under the indenture; (2) it would be able to incur at least $1.00 more of indebtedness without the ratio of its consolidated cash flow to its fixed charges (each as defined in the indenture, and calculated on a


	December 31,
	2008		2009

Cinemark USA, Inc. term loan	$	1,094,800	$	1,083,600
Cinemark USA, Inc. 8⁵/8% senior notes due 2019⁽¹⁾		—		458,897
Cinemark, Inc. 9³/4% senior discount notes due 2014		411,318		—
Cinemark USA, Inc. 9% senior subordinated notes due 2013		181		181
Other long-term debt		2,163		1,027

Total long-term debt		1,508,462		1,543,705
Less current portion		12,450		12,227

Long-term debt, less current portion	$	1,496,012	$	1,531,478


⁽¹⁾		Includes the $470,000 aggregate principal amount of the 8⁵/8% senior notes net of the unamortized discount of $11,103.

F-21

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In thousands, except share and per share data

pro forma basis for the most recently ended four full fiscal quarters for which internal financial statements are available, using certain assumptions and modifications specified in the indenture, and including the additional indebtedness then being incurred) falling below two to one (the “senior notes debt incurrence ratio test”); and (3) the aggregate amount of distributions made since March 31, 2004, including the distribution proposed, is less than the sum of (a) half of its consolidated net income (as defined in the indenture) since February 11, 2003, (b) the net proceeds to it from the issuance of stock since April 2, 2004, and (c) certain other amounts specified in the indenture, subject to certain adjustments specified in the indenture. The dividend restriction is subject to certain exceptions specified in the indenture.

Senior Secured Credit Facility

On October 5, 2006, in connection with the Century Acquisition, Cinemark USA, Inc., entered into a senior secured credit facility. The senior secured credit facility provides for a seven year term loan of $1,120,000 and a $150,000 revolving credit line that matures in six years unless Cinemark USA, Inc.’s 9% senior subordinated notes have not been refinanced by August 1, 2012 with indebtedness that matures no earlier than seven and one-half years after the closing date of the senior secured credit facility, in which case the maturity date of the revolving credit line becomes August 1, 2012. The net proceeds of the term loan were used to finance a portion of the $531,225 cash portion of the Century Acquisition, repay in full the $253,500 outstanding under the former senior secured credit facility, repay approximately $360,000 of existing indebtedness of Century and to pay for related fees and expenses. The revolving credit line was left undrawn at closing. The revolving credit line is used for general corporate purposes.

At December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, there was ~~$1,101,686~~$1,083,600 outstanding under the term loan and no borrowings outstanding under the $150,000 revolving credit line. ~~Approximately $149,931 was available for borrowing under the revolving credit line, giving effect to a $69 letter of credit outstanding.~~ The average interest rate on outstanding term loan borrowings under the senior secured credit facility at December 31, ~~2007~~2009 was ~~6.7%~~3.1% per annum.

Under the term loan, principal payments of $2,800 are due each calendar quarter ~~beginning December 31, 2006~~ through September 30, 2012 and increase to $263,200 each calendar quarter from December 31, 2012 to maturity at October 5, 2013. Prior to the amendment to the senior secured credit facility discussed below, the term loan accrued interest, at Cinemark USA, Inc.’s option, at: (A) the base rate equal to the higher of (1) the prime lending rate as set forth on the British Banking Association Telerate page 5 or (2) the federal funds effective rate from time to time plus 0.50%, plus a margin that ranges from 0.75% to 1.00% per annum, or (B) a “eurodollar rate” plus a margin that ranges from 1.75% to 2.00% per annum, in each case as adjusted pursuant to Cinemark USA, Inc.’s corporate credit rating. Borrowings under the revolving credit line bear interest, at Cinemark USA, Inc.’s option, at: (A) a base rate equal to the higher of (1) the prime lending rate as set forth on the British Banking Association Telerate page 5 and (2) the federal funds effective rate from time to time plus 0.50%, plus a margin that ranges from 0.50% to 1.00% per annum, or (B) a “eurodollar rate” plus a margin that ranges from 1.50% to 2.00% per annum, in each case as adjusted pursuant to Cinemark USA, Inc.’s consolidated net senior secured leverage ratio as defined in the credit agreement. Cinemark USA, Inc. is required to pay a commitment fee calculated at the rate of 0.50% per annum on the average daily unused portion of the revolving credit line, payable quarterly in arrears, which rate decreases to 0.375% per annum for any fiscal quarter in which Cinemark USA, Inc.’s consolidated net senior secured leverage ratio on the last day of such fiscal quarter is less than 2.25 to 1.0.

On March 14, 2007, Cinemark USA, Inc. amended its senior secured credit facility to, among other things, modify the interest rate on the term loans under the senior secured credit facility, modify certain prepayment terms and covenants, and facilitate the tender offer for the 9% senior subordinated notes. The term loans now accrue interest, at Cinemark USA, Inc.’s option, at: (A) the base rate equal to the higher of (1) the prime lending rate as set forth on the British Banking Association Telerate page 5, or (2) the federal funds effective rate from time to time plus 0.50%, plus a margin that ranges from 0.50% to 0.75% per annum, or (B) a “eurodollar rate” plus a margin that ranges from 1.50% to 1.75%, per annum. In each case, the margin is a function of the corporate credit rating applicable to the borrower. The interest rate on the revolving credit line was not amended. Additionally, the amendment removed any obligation to prepay

~~F-22~~

~~CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~In thousands, except share and per share data~~

amounts outstanding under the senior secured credit facility in an amount equal to the amount of the net cash proceeds received from the NCM Transaction or from excess cash flows, and imposed a 1% prepayment premium for one year on certain prepayments of the term loans.

Cinemark USA, Inc.’s obligations under the senior secured credit facility are guaranteed by Cinemark Holdings, Inc.~~, Cinemark, Inc., CNMK Holding, Inc.,~~ and certain of Cinemark USA, Inc.’s domestic subsidiaries and are secured by mortgages on certain fee and leasehold properties and security interests in substantially all of Cinemark USA, Inc.’s and the guarantors’ personal property, including, without limitation, pledges of all of Cinemark USA, Inc.’s capital stock, all of the capital stock of ~~Cinemark, Inc., CNMK Holding, Inc. and~~ certain of Cinemark USA, Inc.’s domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the voting stock of certain of its foreign subsidiaries.

The senior secured credit facility contains usual and customary negative covenants for agreements of this type, including, but not limited to, restrictions on Cinemark USA, Inc.’s ability, and in certain instances, its subsidiaries’ and Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s ~~Cinemark, Inc.’s and CNMK Holding, Inc.’s~~ ability, to consolidate or merge or liquidate, wind up or dissolve; substantially change the nature of its business; sell, transfer or dispose of assets; create or incur indebtedness; create liens; pay dividends, and repurchase ~~stock and voluntarily repurchase or redeem the 9~~³/4~~% senior discount notes;~~stock; and make capital expenditures and investments. The senior secured credit facility also requires Cinemark USA, Inc. to satisfy a consolidated net senior secured leverage ratio covenant as determined in accordance with the senior secured credit facility.

The dividend restriction contained in the senior secured credit facility prevents the Company and any of ~~our~~its subsidiaries from paying a dividend or otherwise distributing cash to its stockholders unless (1) the Company is not in default, and the distribution would not cause the Company to be in default, under the senior secured credit facility; and

F-22

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In thousands, except share and per share data

(2) the aggregate amount of certain dividends, distributions, investments, redemptions and capital expenditures made since October 5, 2006, including dividends declared by the ~~distribution currently proposed,~~board of directors, is less than the sum of (a) the aggregate amount of cash and cash equivalents received by Cinemark Holdings, Inc. or Cinemark USA, Inc. as common equity since October 5, 2006, (b) Cinemark USA, Inc.’s consolidated EBITDA minus 1.75 times its consolidated interest expense, each as defined in the senior secured credit facility, since October 1, 2006, (c) $150 million and (d) certain other amounts specified in the senior secured credit facility, subject to certain adjustments specified in the senior secured credit facility. The dividend restriction is subject to certain exceptions specified in the senior secured credit facility.

See Note 15 for a discussion of interest rate swap agreements.

Senior Notes

On June 29, 2009, Cinemark USA, Inc. issued $470,000 aggregate principal amount of 8.625% senior notes due 2019 with an original issue discount of $11,468, resulting in proceeds of approximately $458,532. The proceeds were primarily used to fund the repurchase of Cinemark, Inc.’s 9³/4% senior discount notes discussed below. Interest is payable on June 15 and December 15 of each year beginning December 15, 2009. The senior notes mature on June 15, 2019. The Company incurred debt issue costs of $12,722 in connection with the issuance, which will be amortized on the straight-line method over the term of the senior notes. The original issue discount is being amortized on the effective interest method over the term of the senior notes.

The senior notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several senior unsecured basis by certain of Cinemark USA, Inc.’s subsidiaries that guarantee, assume or become liable with respect to any of Cinemark USA, Inc.’s or a guarantor’s debt. The senior notes and the guarantees are senior unsecured obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of Cinemark USA, Inc.’s and its guarantor’s existing and future senior unsecured debt and senior in right of payment to all of Cinemark USA, Inc.’s and its guarantor’s existing and future subordinated debt. The senior notes and the guarantees are effectively subordinated to all of Cinemark USA, Inc.’s and its guarantor’s existing and future secured debt to the extent of the value of the assets securing such debt, including all borrowings under Cinemark USA, Inc.’s senior secured credit facility. The senior notes and the guarantees are structurally subordinated to all existing and future debt and other liabilities of Cinemark USA, Inc.’s subsidiaries that do not guarantee the senior notes.

Prior to June 15, 2014, Cinemark USA, Inc. may redeem all or any part of the senior notes at its option at 100% of the principal amount plus a make-whole premium. After June 15, 2014, Cinemark USA, Inc. may redeem the senior notes in whole or in part at redemption prices described in the senior notes. In addition, Cinemark USA, Inc. may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the senior notes from the net proceeds of certain equity offerings at the redemption price set forth in the senior notes.

F-23

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In thousands, except share and per share data

Cinemark USA, Inc. and its guarantor subsidiaries filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) on September 24, 2009 pursuant to which Cinemark USA, Inc. offered to exchange the senior notes for substantially similar registered senior notes. The registration statement became effective and the notes were exchanged on December 17, 2009. The exchanged registered senior notes do not have transfer restrictions.

Senior Discount Notes

On March 31, 2004, Cinemark, Inc. issued approximately $577,173 aggregate principal amount at maturity of 9³/4% senior discount notes due 2014. Interest on the notes accreted until March 15, 2009 up to their aggregate principal amount. Subsequently, cash interest accrued and was payable semi-annually in arrears on March 15 and September 15, commencing on September 15, 2009.

Prior to 2007, Cinemark, Inc. repurchased on the open market $41,615 aggregate principal amount at maturity of its 9³/4% senior discount notes for approximately $33,047 including accreted interest of $5,555 and cash premiums of $1,414. Cinemark, Inc. funded these repurchases with available cash from its operations.

During 2007, in six open market purchases, Cinemark, Inc. repurchased a total of $69,155 aggregate principal amount at maturity of its 9³/4% senior discount notes for approximately $63,694, including accreted interest of $16,592 and cash premiums of $3,966. Cinemark, Inc. funded these transactions with proceeds from the Company’s initial public offering. The Company recorded a loss on early retirement of debt of $5,504 during the year ended December 31, 2007, related to these repurchases, which consisted of premiums paid, other fees and the write-off of unamortized debt issue costs.

During 2008, in ten open market purchases, Cinemark, Inc. repurchased $47,000 aggregate principal amount at maturity of its 9³/4% senior discount notes for approximately $42,208, including accreted interest of $15,186 and a discount of $2,537. Cinemark, Inc. funded the transactions with proceeds from the Company’s initial public offering. The Company recorded a gain on early retirement of debt of approximately $1,698 during the year ended December 31, 2008 related to these repurchases, which included gains on the repurchases offset by the write-off of unamortized debt issue costs.

On June 15, 2009, the Company commenced a cash tender offer for any and all of its 9³/4% senior discount notes due 2014, of which $419,403 aggregate principal amount at maturity remained outstanding. In connection with the tender offer, the Company solicited consents to adopt proposed amendments to the indenture to eliminate substantially all restrictive covenants and certain events of default provisions. On June 29, 2009, approximately $402,459 aggregate principal amount at maturity of the 9³/4% senior discount notes were tendered and repurchased by the Company for approximately $433,415, including accreted interest of $151,952, accrued interest of $11,336 and tender premiums paid of $19,620. The Company funded the repurchase with proceeds from the issuance of the senior notes discussed above.

Effective as of June 29, 2009, the Company and the Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. as trustee to the indenture dated March 31, 2004, executed the First Supplemental Indenture to amend the Indenture by eliminating substantially all restrictive covenants and certain events of default provisions.

On August 3, 2009, the Company delivered to the Bank of New York Trust Company N.A., as trustee, a notice to redeem the $16,944 aggregate principal amount at maturity of the Company’s 9³/4% senior discount notes remaining outstanding. The senior discount notes were redeemed on September 8, 2009, at which time the Company paid approximately $18,564, consisting of a redemption price of 104.875% of the face amount of the discount notes remaining outstanding (resulting in a call premium of $826), which included accreted interest of $6,397, plus accrued and unpaid interest of $794 to, but not including, the redemption date. The Company funded the redemption with proceeds from the issuance of the senior notes discussed above.

The Company recorded a loss on early retirement of debt of approximately $27,878 during the year ended December 31, 2009, which includes tender and call premiums paid, other tender fees and the write-off of unamortized debt issue costs.

F-24

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In thousands, except share and per share data

Senior Subordinated Notes

On February 11, 2003, Cinemark USA, Inc. issued $150,000 aggregate principal amount of 9% senior subordinated notes due 2013 and on May 7, 2003, Cinemark USA, Inc. issued an additional $210,000 aggregate principal amount of 9% senior subordinated notes due 2013, collectively referred to as the 9% senior subordinated notes. Interest is payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year.

~~On April 6, 2004, as a result of the MDP Merger and in accordance with the terms of the indenture governing the 9% senior subordinated notes, Cinemark USA, Inc. made a change of control offer~~Prior to repurchase the 9% senior subordinated notes at a purchase price of 101% of the aggregate principal amount. Approximately $17,750 aggregate principal amount of the 9% senior subordinated notes were tendered. The payment of the change of control price was funded with available cash by Cinemark USA, Inc. on June 1, 2004.

~~During May 2006, as part of three open market purchases,~~2007, Cinemark USA, Inc. repurchased ~~$10,000~~a total of $27,750 aggregate principal amount of its 9% senior subordinated ~~notes for approximately $10,977, including cash premiums paid and accrued and unpaid interest.~~notes. The transactions were funded by Cinemark USA, Inc. with available cash from its operations. The Company recorded a loss on early retirement of debt of $126 during the year ended December 31, 2006 related to the 2006 repurchases discussed above, which included the write-off of unamortized debt issue costs and tender offer repurchase costs, including premiums paid, related to the retired senior subordinated notes.

~~F-23~~

~~CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~In thousands, except share and per share data~~

On March 6, 2007, Cinemark USA, Inc. commenced an offer to purchase for cash any and all of its then outstanding $332,250 aggregate principal amount of 9% senior subordinated notes. In connection with the tender offer, Cinemark USA, Inc. solicited consents for certain proposed amendments to the indenture to remove substantially all restrictive covenants and certain events of default provisions. On March 20, 2007, the early settlement date, Cinemark USA, Inc. repurchased $332,000 aggregate principal amount of 9% senior subordinated notes and executed a supplemental indenture ~~removing substantially all of~~implementing the ~~restrictive covenants and certain events of default.~~proposed amendments. Cinemark USA, Inc. used the proceeds from the NCM Transaction and cash on hand to purchase the 9% senior subordinated notes tendered pursuant to the tender offer and consent solicitation. On March 20, 2007, the Company and the Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee to the Indenture dated February 11, 2003, executed the Fourth Supplemental Indenture. The Fourth Supplemental Indenture became effective on March 20, 2007 and it amends the Indenture by eliminating substantially all restrictive covenants and certain events of default provisions. On April 3, 2007, Cinemark USA, Inc. repurchased an additional $66 aggregate principal amount of the 9% senior subordinated notes tendered after the early settlement date. The Company recorded a loss on early retirement of debt of $7,952 during the year ended December 31, 2007, related to ~~the 2007~~these repurchases, ~~discussed above,~~ which consisted of tender offer repurchase costs, including premiums paid and other fees, and the write-off of unamortized debt issue costs, partially offset by the write-off of an unamortized bond premium.

During 2008, in one open market purchase, Cinemark USA, Inc. repurchased $3 aggregate principal amount of its 9% senior subordinated notes.

As of December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, Cinemark USA, Inc. had outstanding approximately ~~$184~~$181 aggregate principal amount of 9% senior subordinated notes. Cinemark USA, Inc. may redeem the remaining 9% senior subordinated notes ~~on or after February 1, 2008.~~at its option at any time.

~~Former Senior Secured Credit Facility~~Fair Value of Long Term Debt

~~On April 2, 2004, Cinemark USA, Inc. amended~~The Company estimates the fair value of its ~~then existing senior secured credit facility in connection with~~long term debt primarily using quoted market prices, which fall under Level 2. The carrying value of the ~~MDP Merger.~~Company’s long term debt was $1,543,705 and $1,508,462 as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The ~~amended senior secured credit facility provided for a $260,000 seven year~~fair value of the Company’s long term ~~loan~~debt was $1,513,838 and ~~a $100,000 six~~$1,449,147 as of December 31, 2009 and ~~one-half year revolving credit line.~~2008, respectively. The ~~net proceeds from~~estimated fair value does not include prepayment penalties that would be incurred upon the ~~amended senior secured credit facility were used to repay~~early extinguishment of certain debt issues.

Covenant Compliance and Debt Maturity

As of December 31, 2009, the ~~then existing term loan of approximately $163,764 and to redeem the approximately $94,165 aggregate principal amount of Cinemark USA, Inc.’s then outstanding $105,000 aggregate principal amount 8~~¹/2~~% senior subordinated notes due 2008 that were tendered pursuant to the tender offer.~~

~~On October 5, 2006, in connection with the Century Acquisition, the $253,500 outstanding under the former senior secured credit facility~~Company was ~~repaid~~ in full compliance with ~~a portion of the proceeds from the senior secured credit facility. During the year ended~~all agreements, including related covenants, governing its outstanding debt. The Company’s long-term debt at December 31, ~~2006, the Company recorded a loss on early retirement of debt of $5,782 related to the write-off unamortized debt issue costs associated with the former senior secured credit facility.~~2009 matures as follows:


2010	$	12,227
2011		11,200
2012		271,600
2013		789,781
2014		—
Thereafter		470,000	⁽¹⁾

Total	$	1,554,808


⁽¹⁾		Reflects the aggregate principal amount at maturity of the 8⁵/₈% senior notes before the original issue discount of $11,103 .

~~F-24~~F-25

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In thousands, except share and per share data

~~Covenant Compliance and Debt Maturity~~

As of December 31, 2007, the Company was in full compliance with all agreements, including related covenants, governing its outstanding debt. The Company’s long-term debt at December 31, 2007 matures as follows:

2008 $ 9,166
2009 13,775
2010 12,452
2011 11,200
2012 271,600
Thereafter 1,256,187

Total $ 1,574,380

The estimated fair value of the Company’s long-term debt at December 31, 2007 was approximately $1,552,892. This amount does not include prepayment penalties that would be incurred upon the early extinguishment of certain debt issues.

Debt issue costs of $37,660, less accumulated amortization of $9,522, are related to the senior discount notes, senior subordinated notes, the senior secured credit facility and other debt agreements and are included in deferred charges and other assets — net, on the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2007 (See Note 12).

~~14.~~15. INTEREST RATE SWAP AGREEMENTS

During 2007 and 2008, the Company entered into three interest rate swap agreements. The interest rate swap agreements qualify for cash flow hedge accounting. The fair values of the interest rate swaps are recorded on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as an asset or liability with the effective portion of the interest rate swaps’ gains or losses reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and the ineffective portion reported in earnings. The valuation technique used to determine fair value is the income approach and under this approach, the Company uses projected future interest rates as provided by counterparties to the interest rate swap agreements and the fixed rates that the Company is obligated to pay under these agreements. Therefore, the Company’s measurements use significant unobservable inputs, which fall in Level 3 as defined by ASC Topic 820-10-35.

In March 2007, the Company entered into two interest rate swap agreements with effective dates of August 13, 2007 and terms of five years each. The interest rate swaps were designated to hedge approximately $500,000 of the Company’s variable rate debt obligations under its senior secured credit facility. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreements, the Company pays fixed rates of 4.918% and 4.922% on $375,000 and $125,000, respectively, of variable rate debt and receives interest at a variable rate based on the 3-month LIBOR. The 3-month LIBOR rate on each reset date determines the variable portion of the interest rate swaps for the three-month period following the reset date. No premium or discount was incurred upon the Company entering into the interest rate swaps because the pay and receive rates on the interest rate swaps represented prevailing rates for each counterparty at the time the interest rate swaps were consummated.

On September 14, 2008, the counterparty to the $375,000 interest rate swap agreement filed for bankruptcy protection. As a result, the Company determined that on September 15, 2008, when the counterparty’s credit rating was downgraded, the interest rate swap was no longer highly effective. On October 1, 2008, this interest rate swap was terminated by the Company. The change in fair value of this interest rate swap agreement from inception to September 14, 2008 was recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss. The change in fair value from September 15, 2008 through September 30, 2008 and the gain on termination were recorded in earnings as a component of interest expense during the year ended December 31, 2008. The Company determined that the forecasted transactions hedged by this interest rate swap are still probable to occur, thus the total amount reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to this swap of $18,147 is being amortized on a straight-line basis to interest expense over the period during which the forecasted transactions are expected to occur, which is September 15, 2008 through August 13, 2012. The Company amortized approximately $1,351 and $4,633 to interest expense during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009. The Company will amortize approximately $4,633 to interest expense over the next twelve months.

During October 2008, the Company entered into one interest rate swap agreement with an effective date of November 14, 2008 and a term of four years. The interest rate ~~swaps qualify~~swap was designated to hedge approximately $100,000 of the Company’s variable rate debt obligations under its senior secured credit facility for ~~cash flow hedge accounting treatment in accordance with SFAS No. 133, “~~~~Accounting~~three years and $75,000 of the Company’s variable rate debt obligations under its senior secured credit facility for ~~Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities~~~~,” and as such,~~four years. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreement, the Company ~~has effectively hedged its exposure to variability in the future cash flows attributable to the 3-month LIBOR~~pays a fixed rate of 3.63% on ~~$500,000~~$175,000 of variable rate ~~debt.~~debt and receives interest at a variable rate based on the 1-month LIBOR. The ~~change in~~1-month LIBOR rate on each reset date determines the variable portion of the interest rate swap for the one-month period following the reset date. No premium or discount was incurred upon the Company entering into the interest rate swap because the pay and receive rates on the interest rate swap represented prevailing rates for the counterparty at the time the interest rate swap was consummated.

As of December 31, 2009, the fair values of the $125,000 interest rate ~~swaps is~~swap and the $175,000 interest rate swap were liabilities of approximately $10,268 and $8,256, respectively, which have been reported as a component of other long-term liabilities. A corresponding cumulative amount of $11,367, net of taxes of $7,157, has been recorded as an increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as ~~an asset or liability with the effective portion of the interest rate swaps’ gains or losses reported as a component of other comprehensive income and the ineffective portion reported in earnings.~~

As of December 31, 2007, the interest rate swaps were a liability with an aggregate fair value of approximately $18,422, which has been recorded as a component of deferred revenues and other long-term liabilities with a corresponding amount of $18,422 ($11,348 net of deferred taxes) recorded as a decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. The2009. These two interest rate swaps exhibited no ineffectiveness during the ~~year~~years ended December 31, ~~2007.~~2008 and 2009.

~~15.~~16. FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION

The accumulated other comprehensive ~~income~~loss account in stockholders’ equity of ~~$11,463~~$72,347 and ~~$32,695~~$7,459 at December 31, ~~2006~~2008 and December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, respectively, includes the cumulative foreign currency adjustments of ~~$11,463~~$(40,287) and ~~$44,043,~~$16,070, respectively, from translating the financial statements of the Company’s international subsidiaries.

In 2006 and 2007, all foreign countries where the Company has operations, including Brazil were deemed non-highly inflationary. Thus, any fluctuation in the currency results in a cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment to the accumulated other comprehensive income account recorded as an increase in, or reduction of, stockholders’ equity.

~~F-25~~

~~CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~In thousands, except share and per share data~~

On December 31, 2007, the exchange rate for the Brazilian real was 1.77 reais to the U.S. dollar (the exchange rate was 2.14 reais to the U.S. dollar at December 31, 2006). As a result, the effect of translating the December 31, 2007 Brazilian financial statements into U.S. dollars is reflected as a cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment to the accumulated other comprehensive income account as an increase in stockholders’ equity of $47,233. At December 31, 2007, the total assets of the Company’s Brazilian subsidiaries were U.S. $204,661.

On December 31, 2007, the exchange rate for the Mexican peso was 10.92 pesos to the U.S. dollar (the exchange rate was 10.82 pesos to the U.S. dollar at December 31, 2006). As a result, the effect of translating the December 31, 2007 Mexican financial statements into U.S. dollars is reflected as a cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment to the accumulated other comprehensive income account as a decrease in stockholders’ equity of $949. At December 31, 2007, the total assets of the Company’s Mexican subsidiaries were U.S. $162,937.

~~16. INVESTMENTS IN AND ADVANCES TO AFFILIATES~~

~~The Company had the following investments in and advances to affiliates at December 31:~~

December 31, December 31,
2006 2007

Investment in National CineMedia LLC — investment, at equity $ 5,353 $ —
Fandango, Inc. — investment, at cost 2,142 —
Investment in DCIP — investment at equity — 33% interest — 260
Cinemark — Core Pacific, Ltd. (Taiwan) — investment, at cost — 14% interest 1,383 1,383
Other 2,512 2,019

Total $ 11,390 $ 3,662

~~The Company’s investment in NCM was reduced from $5,353 at December 31, 2006 to $0 at December 31, 2007 due to equity losses of $1,284 and the NCM Transaction discussed in Note 7.~~

~~The Company’s investment in Fandango was reduced from $2,142 at December 31, 2006 to $0 at December 31, 2007 as a result of the Fandango Transaction discussed in Note 9.~~

During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company invested $1,500 for a one-third ownership in DCIP. The Company’s basis was reduced to $260 as a result of equity losses of $1,240 recorded during 2007. See Note 8.

~~17. MINORITY INTERESTS IN SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~Minority ownership interests in subsidiaries of the Company are as follows at December 31:~~

December 31, December 31,
2006 2007

Cinemark Partners II — 49.2% interest $ 8,862 $ 8,260
Cinemark Equity Holdings Corp. (Central America) — 49.9% interest 2,263 2,344
Cinemark Colombia, S.A. — 49.0% interest 2,483 2,766
Greeley Ltd. — 49.0% interest 1,422 1,244
Cinemark del Ecuador, S.A. — 40.0% interest 994 1,196
Cinemark de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. — 0.6% interest 346 326
Others 243 46

Total $ 16,613 $ 16,182

F-26

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In thousands, except share and per share data

In 2008 and 2009, all foreign countries where the Company has operations were deemed non-highly inflationary and the local currency is the same as the functional currency in all of the locations. Thus, any fluctuation in the currency results in a cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment recorded to accumulated other comprehensive loss.

On December 31, 2009, the exchange rate for the Brazilian real was 1.75 reais to the U.S. dollar (the exchange rate was 2.36 reais to the U.S. dollar at December 31, 2008). As a result, the effect of translating the December 31, 2009 Brazilian financial statements into U.S. dollars is reflected as a cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment to the accumulated other comprehensive loss account as an increase in stockholders’ equity of $48,500. At December 31, 2009, the total assets of the Company’s Brazilian subsidiaries were U.S. $261,892.

On December 31, 2009, the exchange rate for the Mexican peso was 13.04 pesos to the U.S. dollar (the exchange rate was 13.78 pesos to the U.S. dollar at December 31, 2008). As a result, the effect of translating the December 31, 2009 Mexican financial statements into U.S. dollars is reflected as a cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment to the accumulated other comprehensive loss account as an increase in stockholders’ equity of $3,570. At December 31, 2009, the total assets of the Company’s Mexican subsidiaries were U.S. $128,263.

On December 31, 2009, the exchange rate for the Chilean peso was 519.30 pesos to the U.S. dollar (the exchange rate was 648.00 pesos to the U.S. dollar at December 31, 2008). As a result, the effect of translating the December 31, 2009 Chilean financial statements into U.S. dollars is reflected as a cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment to the accumulated other comprehensive loss account as an increase in stockholders’ equity of $3,507. At December 31, 2009, the total assets of the Company’s Chilean subsidiaries were U.S. $29,957.

The effect of translating the December 31, 2009 financial statements of our other international subsidiaries, with local currencies other than the U.S. dollar, is reflected as a cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment to the accumulated other comprehensive loss account as an increase in stockholders’ equity of $780.

17. INVESTMENTS IN AND ADVANCES TO AFFILIATES

The Company had the following investments in and advances to affiliates at December 31:


	December 31,
	2008		2009

Investment in DCIP — investment, at equity— 33% interest	$	1,017	$	640
Cinemark — Core Pacific, Ltd. (Taiwan) — investment, at cost — 14% interest		1,383		1,383
Other		1,884		1,506

Total	$	4,284	$	3,529

During 2009, the Company invested an additional $2,500 in DCIP. The Company’s basis was reduced to $640 as of December 31, 2009 as a result of equity losses of $2,877 recorded during 2009. See Note 8.

18. NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS IN SUBSIDIARIES

Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries of the Company were as follows at December 31:


	December 31,
	2008		2009

Cinemark Partners II — 49.2% interest	$	8,114	$	7,961
Cinemark Colombia, S.A. — 49.0% interest		3,105		4,465
Greeley Ltd. — 49.0% interest		1,015		982
Cinemark Panama S.A. — 20% interest		181		369
Others		556		1,019

Total	$	12,971	$	14,796

F-27

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In thousands, except share and per share data

The exchange of shares occurred during October 2008. See Note 10. Prior to the exchange, the Company owned approximately 51% of the shares in Cinemark Equity Holdings Corporation and subsequent to the exchange, the Company owns 100% of the shares in Cinemark Equity Holdings Corporation. The Company’s Panama subsidiary is 80% owned by Cinemark Equity Holdings Corporation and 20% owned by a minority partner.

During July 2008, the Company’s partners in Ecuador (the “Ecuador Partners”) exercised an option available to them under an Exchange Option Agreement dated April 24, 2007 between the Company and the Ecuador Partners. Under this option, which was triggered by completion of an initial public offering of common stock by the Company, the Ecuador Partners are entitled to exchange their shares in Cinemark del Ecuador S.A. for shares of the Company’s common stock. The exchange of shares occurred during November 2008. See Note 10. Prior to the exchange, the Company owned 60% of the shares in Cinemark del Ecuador S.A. and subsequent to the exchange, the Company owns 100% of the shares in Cinemark del Ecuador S.A.

Below is a summary of the impact of changes in the Company’s ownership interest in its subsidiaries on its equity:


	Years ended December 31,
	2007		2008			2009
Net income (loss) attributable to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.	$	88,920	$	(48,325	)	$	97,108

Transfers from noncontrolling interests
Increase in Cinemark Holdings, Inc. additional paid-in-capital for Central America Share Exchange		—		12,949			—
Increase in Cinemark Holdings, Inc. additional paid-in-capital for Ecuador Share Exchange		—		3,200			—
Increase in Cinemark Holdings, Inc. additional paid-in-capital for buyout of Argentina noncontrolling interests		—		—			23

Net transfers from non-controlling interests		—		16,149			23

Change from net income (loss) attributable to Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and transfers from noncontrolling interests	$	88,920	$	(32,176	)	$	97,131

19. CAPITAL STOCK

Common Stock —Common stockholders are entitled to vote on all matters submitted to a vote of the Company’s stockholders. Subject to the rights of holders of any then outstanding shares of the Company’s preferred stock, the Company’s common stockholders are entitled to any dividends that may be declared by the board of directors. The shares of the Company’s common stock are not subject to any redemption provisions. The Company has no issued and outstanding shares of preferred stock.

The Company’s ability to pay dividends is effectively limited by its status as a holding company and the terms of its indenture and its subsidiary’s senior secured credit facility, which also significantly restrict the ability of certain of the Company’s subsidiaries to pay dividends directly or indirectly to the Company. Furthermore, certain of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries currently have a deficit in retained earnings which prevents the Company from declaring and paying dividends from those subsidiaries.

All stock information has been adjusted to give effect to a 2.9585-for-1 stock split effected by the Company on April 9, 2007.

F-28

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In thousands, except share and per share data

As a result of this exchange, the Company issued 393,615 shares of its common stock to its Ecuador partners during November 2008. See Note 10.

Treasury Stock —Treasury stock represents shares of common stock repurchased by the Company and not yet retired. The Company has applied the cost method in recording its treasury shares. During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company repurchased 6,499 shares of treasury stock at a cost of $0.001 per share as a result of restricted stock forfeitures. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company repurchased 23,976 shares of treasury stock at a cost of $0.001 per share as a result of restricted stock forfeitures and repurchased 3,274,943 shares at an aggregate cost of $43,895, as a result of the noncash exercises of stock options by employees, both of which were done in accordance with the Amended and Restated 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan. In a noncash exercise, the exercise price for the shares to be held by employees and the related tax withholdings are satisfied with stock withholdings. Employees exercised a total of 4,577,025 options and of this amount, 3,274,943 shares were repurchased by the Company to satisfy the exercise price and tax liabilities. The remaining 1,302,082 shares were issued to employees. The Company repurchased the 3,274,943 shares at current market value, which ranged from $13.40 to $13.46 based on the day on which the stock options were exercised. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had no plans to retire any shares of treasury stock.

Share Based Awards—Upon consummation of the MDP Merger on April 2, 2004, all Cinemark, Inc.’s stock options outstanding prior to the MDP Merger immediately vested and the majority were repurchased and the then existing stock option plans, which included the Independent Director Stock Options and the Long Term Incentive Plan, were terminated.

On September 30, 2004, Cinemark, Inc.’s board of directors and the majority of its stockholders approved the 2004 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “2004 Plan”) under which 9,097,360 shares of common stock are available for issuance to selected employees, directors and consultants of the Company. The 2004 Plan provided for restricted share grants, incentive option grants and nonqualified option grants.

On August 2, 2006, Cinemark Holdings, Inc. was formed as the Delaware holding company of Cinemark, Inc. Under a share exchange agreement dated August 7, 2006, each outstanding share of Cinemark, Inc.’s Class A common stock was exchanged for an equivalent number of shares of Cinemark Holdings, Inc. common stock. The share exchange was completed on October 5, 2006.

In November 2006, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s board of directors amended the 2004 Plan to provide that no additional awards may be granted under the 2004 Plan. At that time, the Board of Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and the majority of Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s stockholders approved the 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”). and all options to purchase shares of Cinemark Inc.’s Class A common stock under the 2004 Plan were exchanged for an equal number of options to purchase shares of Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s common stock under the 2006 Plan. The 2006 Plan is substantially similar to the 2004 Plan.

During ~~October 2007,~~March 2008, the Company’s board of directors approved the Amended and ~~a majority of its stockholders approved an amendment to~~Restated Cinemark Holdings, Inc. 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “Restated Incentive Plan”). The Restated Incentive Plan amends and restates the 2006 Plan, ~~that allows option holders, at~~to (i) increase the ~~discretion~~number of shares reserved for issuance from 9,097,360 shares of common stock to 19,100,000 shares of common stock and (ii) permit the Compensation Committee of the Company’s board of directors (the “Compensation Committee”) to award participants restricted stock units and performance awards. The right of a participant to exercise ~~options~~or receive a grant of a restricted stock unit or performance award may be subject to ~~purchase common stock~~the satisfaction of such performance or objective business criteria as determined by ~~directing~~the Compensation Committee. With the exception of the changes identified in (i) and (ii) above, the Restated Incentive Plan does not materially differ from the 2006 Plan. The Restated Incentive Plan was approved by the Company’s stockholders at its annual meeting held on May 15, 2008.

During August 2008, the Company ~~to retain an equivalent number~~filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form S-8 for the purpose of registering the additional shares ~~having a fair market value equal to all or part of~~available for issuance under the ~~exercise price of the exercised options. The amendment did not result in any additional compensation expense to the Company.~~Restated Incentive Plan.

Stock Options—~~On September 30, 2004,~~ Below is a summary of stock option activity and related information for the Company granted options to purchase 6,986,731 shares of its common stock under the 2004 Plan at an exercise price of $7.63 per option. The exercise price was equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Options to purchase 692,976 shares vested immediatelyyears ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and the remaining options granted in 2004 vest daily over the period ending April 1, 2009. The options expire ten years from the grant date. On January 28, 2005, the Company granted options to purchase 12,055 shares of its common stock under the Plan at an exercise price of $7.63 per option (equal to the market value at the date of grant). The options vest daily over five years and the options expire ten years from the grant date.2009:

~~F-27~~F-29

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In thousands, except share and per share data

~~For each 2004~~


	Year Ended					Year Ended					Year Ended
	December 31, 2007					December 31, 2008					December 31, 2009
				Weighted					Weighted					Weighted
				Average					Average					Average		Aggregate
				Exercise					Exercise					Exercise		Intrinsic
	Shares			Price		Shares			Price		Shares			Price		Value
Outstanding at January 1		6,980,593		$	7.63		6,323,429		$	7.63		6,139,670		$	7.63
Granted		—			—		—			—		—			—
Forfeited		(112,416	)	$	7.63		(14,492	)	$	7.63		—			—
Exercised		(544,748	)	$	7.63		(169,267	)	$	7.63		(4,907,778	)	$	7.63

Outstanding at December 31		6,323,429		$	7.63		6,139,670		$	7.63		1,231,892		$	7.63	$	8,303

Vested options at December 31		4,647,460		$	7.63		5,809,343		$	7.63		1,231,892		$	7.63	$	8,303

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and ~~2005 grant,~~2009, was $4,961, $1,191 and $28,083, respectively.

The Company recorded compensation expense of $2,881 and $3,393 during the ~~fair values~~years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively, related to these stock options. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company changed its estimated forfeiture rate of 5% to 2.5% based on actual cumulative stock option forfeitures. The cumulative impact of the reduction in forfeiture rate was $260 and was recorded as additional compensation expense during the year ended December 31, 2009. During July 2009, the Company modified the terms of certain stock options ~~were estimated~~outstanding by extending the expiration date by approximately two years. The Company recorded additional compensation expense of approximately $132 related to this modification. The Company recorded total compensation expense of $1,152, including the aforementioned $260 related to the change in forfeiture rate and $132 related to the option modification, and a tax benefit of approximately $434 during the year ended December 31, 2009, related to the outstanding stock options. As of December 31, 2009, there was no remaining unrecognized compensation expense related to outstanding stock options since all outstanding options fully vested on April 2, 2009. All options outstanding at December 31, 2009 have an average remaining contractual life of approximately 4.75 years.

Restricted Stock— During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company granted 472,881 shares of restricted stock to independent directors and employees of the Company. The fair value of the shares of restricted stock was determined based on the market value of the Company’s stock on the dates of grant, ~~using~~which ranged from $9.50 to $11.32 per share. The Company assumed forfeiture rates ranging from zero to 5% for the ~~Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:~~

September 30, January 28,
2004 2005
Grant Grant
Expected life 6.5 years 6.5 years
Expected volatility⁽¹⁾
39% 44%
Risk-free interest rate 3.79% 3.93%
Dividend yield 0% 0%
Grant date fair value $3.51 $3.80


⁽¹⁾		~~Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of the common stock price of comparable public companies.~~

~~Forfeitures were estimated~~restricted stock awards. The restricted stock vests over periods ranging from one year to four years based on continued service by the ~~Company’s historical stock option activity.~~directors and employees.

ABelow is a summary of restricted stock ~~option~~ activity ~~and related information~~ for the years ended December 31, ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 and ~~2007 is as follows:~~2009:


															Year Ended				Year Ended					Year Ended
	Year Ended				Year Ended					Year Ended					December 31, 2007				December 31, 2008					December 31, 2009
	December 31, 2005				December 31, 2006					December 31, 2007							Weighted					Weighted					Weighted
			Weighted					Weighted					Weighted				Average					Average					Average
			Average					Average					Average				Exercise					Exercise					Exercise
			Exercise					Exercise					Exercise		Shares		Price		Shares			Price		Shares			Price
	Shares		Price		Shares			Price		Shares			Price
Outstanding at January 1		6,986,731	$	7.63		6,998,786		$	7.63		6,980,593		$	7.63		—		—		21,880		$	18.28		385,666		$	13.32
Granted		12,055	$	7.63		—			—		—			—		21,880	$	18.28		392,317		$	13.32		472,881		$	9.69
Vested																—		—		(22,032	)	$	18.24		(70,493	)	$	13.77
Forfeited		—		—		(13,590	)	$	7.63		(112,416	)	$	7.63		—		—		(6,499	)	$	13.14		(23,976	)	$	11.15
Exercised		—		—		(4,603	)	$	7.63		(544,748	)	$	7.63

Outstanding at December 31		6,998,786	$	7.63		6,980,593		$	7.63		6,323,429		$	7.63		21,880	$	18.28		385,666		$	13.32		764,078		$	11.10

Options exercisable at December 31		2,444,533	$	7.63		3,834,295		$	7.63		4,647,460		$	7.63

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In thousands, except share and per share data

~~Restricted Stock~~- During October 2007, the Company issued 21,880 shares of restricted stock to its independent directors at a purchase price of $0.001 per share. The fair value of the shares was approximately $400 based on the market value of the Company’s stock on the date of grant, which was $18.28 per share. These restricted stock awards fully vest on June 29, 2008 after one year of service. The Company recorded compensation expense of $200 related to ~~these awards~~the change in forfeiture rate during ~~the year ended~~2008. As of December 31, ~~2007. The~~2009, the remaining unrecognized compensation expense ~~of $200~~related to these restricted stock awards was approximately $5,728 and the weighted average period over which this remaining compensation expense will be recognized is approximately three years. The total fair value of shares vested during ~~2008.~~the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 was $0, $286 and $762, respectively. Upon vesting, the Company receives aan income tax deduction. The recipients of ~~the~~ restricted stock are entitled to receive dividends and to vote their respective shares, however the sale and transfer of the restricted shares is prohibited during the restriction period. ~~The restricted shares are also subject to the terms and conditions of the 2006 Plan.~~

~~A summary of restricted stock activity for~~Restricted Stock Units— During the years ended December 31, ~~2005, 2006~~2008 and ~~2007~~2009, the Company granted restricted stock units representing 204,361 and 303,168 hypothetical shares of common stock, respectively, under the Restated Incentive Plan. The restricted stock units vest based on a combination of financial performance factors and continued service. The financial performance factors are based on an implied equity value concept that determines an internal rate of return (“IRR”) during a three fiscal year period based on a formula utilizing a multiple of Adjusted EBITDA subject to certain specified adjustments (as defined in the restricted stock unit award agreement). The financial performance factors for the restricted stock units have a threshold, target and maximum level of payment opportunity. If the IRR for the three year period is ~~as follows:~~

Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended
December 31, December 31, December 31,
2005 2006 2007
Outstanding at January 1 — — —
Granted — — 21,880
Forfeited — — —

Outstanding at December 31 — — 21,880

~~19. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION~~at least 8.5%, which is the threshold, one-third of the restricted stock units vest. If the IRR for the three year period is at least 10.5%, which is the target, two-thirds of the restricted stock units vest. If the IRR for the three year period is at least 12.5%, which is the maximum, 100% of the restricted stock units vest. All payouts of restricted stock units that vest are subject to an additional one year service requirement and will be paid in the form of common stock if the participant continues to provide services through the fourth anniversary of the grant date. Restricted stock unit award participants are eligible to receive dividend equivalent payments if and at the time the restricted stock unit awards become vested.

~~The following~~Below is ~~provided as supplemental information~~a table summarizing the potential restricted stock unit awards granted during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 at each of the three levels of financial performance (excluding forfeiture assumptions):


	Granted During the Year Ended December 31,
	2008				2009
	Number of				Number of
	Shares		Value at		Shares		Value at
	Vesting		Grant		Vesting		Grant
at IRR of at least 8.5%		68,116	$	885		101,051	$	963
at IRR of at least 10.5%		136,239	$	1,771		202,117	$	1,927
at IRR of at least 12.5%		204,361	$	2,656		303,168	$	2,891

Due to the ~~consolidated statements~~fact that the IRR for the three year performance period could not be determined at the time of ~~cash flows:~~

Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended
December 31, December 31, December 31,
2005 2006 2007

Cash paid for interest $ 45,166 $ 65,716 $ 132,029
Net cash paid for income taxes $ 2,911 $ 27,044 $ 139,443

Noncash investing and financing activities:
Change in construction lease obligations related to construction of theatres $ (4,312 ) $ 395 $ (2,546 )
Changes in accounts payable and accrued expenses for the acquisition of theatre properties and equipment $ 8,945 $ 3,662 $ (9,754 )
Exchange of theatre properties $ — $ 5,400 $ —
Theatre properties and equipment acquired under capital lease $ — $ — $ 9,102
Issuance of common stock as a result of the Century Acquisition $ — $ 150,000 $ —

~~During December 2007,~~each grant, the Company ~~sold~~estimated that the ~~land and building for one~~most likely outcome is the achievement of ~~its theatres for approximately $22,739, resulting in a gain of approximately $2,653.~~the mid-point IRR level. The Company ~~has elected~~assumed forfeiture rates ranging from zero to ~~use these proceeds~~5% for the restricted stock unit awards. If during the service periods, additional information becomes available to ~~purchase a like-kind property in accordance with certain tax guidelines in the Internal Revenue Code. As a result of this election, the proceeds were deposited to an escrow account to which~~lead the Company ~~does not~~to believe a different IRR level will be achieved for the three year performance periods, the Company will reassess the number of units that will vest for the respective grant and adjust its compensation expense accordingly on a prospective basis over the remaining service period.

Approximately 13,279 restricted stock unit awards were forfeited during the year ended December 31, 2009, which was within the Company’s original forfeiture rate estimates. No restricted stock unit awards have ~~access until it has identified~~vested. The Company recorded compensation expense of $0, $326 and $759 related to these restricted stock unit awards during the ~~like-kind property to purchase with the proceeds.~~years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively. As of December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, the ~~proceeds from~~remaining unrecognized compensation expense related to these restricted stock unit awards was $2,442 and the weighted average period over which this ~~sale are included as Deferred Charges and Other Assets on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.~~remaining compensation expense will be recognized is approximately three years.

~~F-29~~F-31

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In thousands, except share and per share data

20. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

The following is provided as supplemental information to the consolidated statements of cash flows:


	Year Ended December 31,
	2007			2008			2009

Cash paid for interest⁽¹⁾	$	132,029		$	94,533		$	239,376
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds received	$	139,443		$	36,203		$	46,213

Noncash investing and financing activities:
Change in construction lease obligations related to construction of theatres	$	(2,546	)	$	—		$	—
Changes in accounts payable and accrued expenses for the acquisition of theatre properties and equipment⁽²⁾	$	(9,754	)	$	3,723		$	(6,166	)
Theatre properties and equipment acquired under capital lease⁽³⁾	$	9,102		$	7,911		$	20,400
Change in fair market values of interest rate swap agreements (See Note 15)	$	(11,348	)	$	(22,063	)	$	3,898
Issuance of common stock as a result of the Central America Share Exchange (See Note 10)	$	—		$	12,949		$	—
Issuance of common stock as a result of the Ecuador Share Exchange (See Note 10)	$	—		$	3,200		$	—
Investment in NCM (See Note 7)	$	—		$	19,020		$	15,536
Dividends accrued on unvested restricted stock unit awards (See Note 19)	$	—		$	(74	)	$	(201	)
Shares issued upon immaculate stock option exercises (See Note 19)	$	—		$	—		$	34,923


⁽¹⁾		Includes $158,349 of interest paid as a result of the repurchase of approximately $419,403 aggregate principal amount of the Company’s 9³/4% senior discount notes in 2009. The interest portion of the repurchase had accreted on the senior discount notes since issuance during 2004.

⁽²⁾		Additions to theatre properties and equipment included in accounts payable as of December 31, 2008 and 2009 were $13,989 and $7,823, respectively.

⁽³⁾		Amount recorded during the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 was a result of the acquisition of theatres in the U.S. as discussed in Note 6.

During December 2007, the Company elected to use the proceeds of approximately $22,739 from the sale of real property to pursue the purchase of a like-kind property in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code and as a result, the proceeds were deposited to an escrow account. During 2008, the Company elected to use the proceeds of approximately $2,089 from the sale of real properties to pursue the purchase of like-kind properties in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code and as a result, the proceeds were deposited to an escrow account. The Company did not purchase like-kind properties and the deposits of approximately $24,828 were returned to the Company during the year ended December 31, 2008.

21. INCOME TAXES

Income (loss) before income taxes consisted of the following:


	Year Ended			Year Ended			Year Ended
	December 31,			December 31,			December 31,			Year Ended December 31,
	2005			2006			2007			2007			2008			2009

Income (loss) before income taxes:
U.S.	$	(21,925	)	$	7,315		$	188,117		$	188,773		$	(53,452	)	$	98,908
Foreign		5,925			6,211			12,765			12,901			30,077			46,693

Total	$	(16,000	)	$	13,526		$	200,882		$	201,674		$	(23,375	)	$	145,601


Current:
Federal	$	17,653		$	19,280		$	123,754		$	123,754		$	37,681		$	35,303
Foreign		2,115			2,416			5,519			5,519			4,620			13,706
State		1,972			868			17,304			17,304			4,729			8,450

Total current expense		21,740			22,564			146,577			146,577			47,030			57,459
Deferred:

Deferred:
Federal		(9,778	)		(14,532	)		(33,103	)		(33,103	)		(28,138	)		(9,527	)
Foreign		24			4,354			286			286			7,330			(2,405	)
State		(2,578	)		299			(1,798	)		(1,798	)		(5,167	)		(682	)

Total deferred expense		(12,332	)		(9,879	)		(34,615	)
Total deferred taxes											(34,615	)		(25,975	)		(12,614	)

Income tax expense	$	9,408		$	12,685		$	111,962		$	111,962		$	21,055		$	44,845

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In thousands, except share and per share data

Deferred Income Taxes

The tax effects of significant temporary differences and tax loss and tax credit carryforwards comprising the net long-term deferred income tax ~~liability at~~liabilities as of December 31, ~~2006~~2008 and ~~2007~~2009 consisted of the following:


								December 31,
	2006			2007				2008		2009
Deferred liabilities:
Theatre properties and equipment	$	125,950		$	164,407			$	105,079	$	102,464
Deferred intercompany sale		7,207			13,719
Deferred intercompany sales									14,543		8,650
Intangible asset — contracts		12,394			11,505				9,545		8,873
Intangible asset — tradenames		117,019			117,197				114,379		116,054
Intangible asset — net favorable leases		3,695			1,731				354		(1,596	)
Investment in partnerships									36,364		38,405

Total deferred liabilities		266,265			308,559				280,264		272,850

Deferred assets:
Deferred lease expenses		3,937			7,375				11,923		13,493
Theatre properties and equipment		5,915			7,248				9,693		11,672
Deferred revenue related to NCM Transaction and Fandango Transaction		—			67,961
Deferred revenue — NCM and Fandango									65,613		64,313
Capital lease obligations		44,477			46,194				46,098		52,645
Bonds		7,598			(989	)
Interest rate swaps agreements		0			7,074				9,515		7,157
Debt issue costs		2,194			557
Tax loss carryforward		15,535			14,359
AMT and other credit carryforwards		2,583			2,903
Tax loss carryforwards									12,342		12,747
Alternative minimum tax and other credit carryforwards									3,606		5,634
Other expenses, not currently deductible for tax purposes		(771	)		2,489				2,319		1,915

Total deferred assets		81,468			155,171				161,109		169,576

Net deferred income tax liability before valuation allowance		184,797			153,388		��		119,155		103,274
Valuation allowance		8,862			9,872
Valuation allowance against deferred assets									13,463		18,228

Net deferred income tax liability	$	193,659		$	163,260			$	132,618	$	121,502

Net deferred tax liability — foreign	$	11,256			11,542

Net deferred tax liability — Foreign								$	16,645	$	13,381
Net deferred tax liability — U.S.		182,403			151,718				115,973		108,121

Total of all deferrals	$	193,659		$	163,260
Total								$	132,618	$	121,502

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In thousands, except share and per share data

Uncertain Tax Positions

The following is a reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits excluding interest and penalties, ~~since~~for the ~~inception of FIN 48:~~

2007
Balance at January 1, 2007 $ 10,512
Gross increases — tax positions in prior period 1,432
Gross increases — current-period tax positions 549

Balance at December 31, 2007 $ 12,493

~~As of~~years ended December 31, 2007, ~~the~~2008 and 2009:


Balance at January 1, 2007	$	10,512
Gross increases — tax positions in prior period		1,432
Gross increases — current-period tax positions		549

Balance at December 31, 2007	$	12,493
Gross increases — tax positions in prior period		37
Gross decreases — tax positions in prior period		(166	)
Gross increases — current-period tax positions		2,397
Gross decreases — current-period tax positions		(752	)
Reductions due to lapse in statute of limitations		(33	)

Balance at December 31, 2008	$	13,976
Gross increases — tax positions in prior period		2,274
Gross increases — current-period tax positions		7,607

Balance at December 31, 2009	$	23,857

The Company had ~~$15,500~~$17,523 and $31,661 of gross unrecognized tax benefits, including interest and ~~penalties.~~penalties as of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Of ~~this amount, $10,768 represents~~these amounts, $13,851 and $23,212 represent the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that if recognized would impact the effective income tax ~~rate. As of~~rate for the years ended December 31, ~~2007 the~~2008 and 2009, respectively. The Company had ~~$3,007~~$3,547 and $7,804 accrued for interest and/or ~~penalties.~~

Cinemark files income tax returns in multiple jurisdictions throughout the US and Latin America. In the US, we are currently under audit by the Internal Revenue Service for the 2002, 2003 and 2004 tax years. Due to uncertainty regarding the timing of the settlement of tax audits, it is possible that there could be significant changes in the amounts of unrecognized tax benefits in 2008, but the amount of such changes cannot be estimatedpenalties as of December 31, ~~2007.~~2008 and 2009, respectively.

The Company ~~or one of~~and its subsidiaries ~~files~~file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and multiple state and foreign jurisdictions, and the Company is routinely under audit by many different tax authorities. ~~Management~~The Company believes that its accrual for tax liabilities is adequate for all open audit years based on its assessment of many factors including past experience and interpretations of tax law. This assessment relies on estimates and assumptions and may involve a series of complex judgments about future events. The Company is no longer subject to income tax audits from the Internal Revenue Service for years before 2002. The Company is no longer subject to state income tax examinations by tax authorities in its major state jurisdictions for years before 2002. The Company is no longer subject to ~~non-US~~non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities in its major non-U.S. tax jurisdictions for years before ~~1998.~~2004.

The Company is currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service for the 2002 through 2007 tax years. It is reasonably possible that the 2002-2004 audits could be completed within the next twelve months. These events could result in a decrease in the Company’s total unrecognized benefits of approximately $13,000 which includes approximately $4,000 of accrued interest.

~~21.~~22. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Leases— The Company conducts a significant part of its theatre operations in leased properties under noncancelable operating and capital leases with terms generally ranging from 10 to 25 years. In addition to the minimum annual lease payments, some of the leases provide for contingent rentals based on operating results of the theatre and most require the payment of taxes, insurance and other costs applicable to the property. The Company can renew, at its option, a substantial portion of the leases at defined or then market rental rates for various periods. Some leases also provide for escalating rent payments throughout the lease term. A liability for deferred lease expenses of ~~$14,286~~$23,371 and ~~$19,235~~$27,698 at December 31, ~~2006~~2008 and ~~2007,~~2009, respectively, has been provided to account for lease expenses on a straight-line basis, where lease payments are not made on such a basis. Rent expense was as follows:

Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended
December 31, December 31, December 31,
2005 2006 2007

Fixed rent expense $ 110,995 $ 130,726 $ 164,915
Contingent rent expense 27,482 30,648 47,815

Facility lease expense 138,477 161,374 212,730
Corporate office rent expense 1,432 1,609 1,996

Total rent expense $ 139,909 $ 162,983 $ 214,726


	Year Ended December 31,
	2007		2008		2009

Fixed rent expense	$	164,915	$	175,368	$	181,075
Contingent rent expense		47,815		50,227		57,704

Total facility lease expense	$	212,730	$	225,595	$	238,779

~~F-32~~F-35

~~The~~ Company entered into annew employment ~~agreement~~agreements with Lee Roy Mitchell, ~~pursuant~~Rob Carmony, and John Lundin. Collectively these new employment agreements are herein referred to ~~which Mr. Mitchell currently serves~~ as the ~~Company’s Chairman.~~“Employment Agreements”. The ~~employment agreement became effective upon the consummation of the MDP Merger. The~~Employment Agreements have an initial term of ~~the employment agreement is~~ three years subject to an automatic extension for a one-year period, unless the employment agreements are terminated. Effective June 3, 2009, the Company terminated its employment agreement with John Lundin. Effective May 25, 2009, the Company entered into a new employment agreement with Steve Bunnell that has an initial term of two years subject to an extension for a one year period, unless the agreement is terminated. ~~Mr. Mitchell received a~~The base ~~salary of approximately $795 during 2007, which is~~salaries stipulated in the employment agreements are subject to ~~annual~~ review during the term of the agreements for increase (but not decrease) each year by the Company’s ~~board of directors or committee or delegate thereof. In addition, Mr. Mitchell is~~Compensation Committee. Management personnel subject to these employment agreements are eligible to receive an annual cash incentive ~~bonus~~bonuses upon the Company meeting certain performance targets established by the board or the compensation committee for the fiscal year. Mr. Mitchell is also entitled to additional fringe benefits including life insurance benefits of not less than $5,000, disability benefits of not less than 66% of base salary, a luxury automobile and a membership at a country club. The employment agreement provides for severance payments upon termination of employment, the amount and nature of which depends upon the reason for the termination of employment. If Mr. Mitchell resigns for good reason or is terminated by the Company without cause (as defined in the agreement), Mr. Mitchell will receive: accrued compensation (which includes base salary and a pro rata bonus) through the date of termination; his annual base salary as in effect at the time of termination for a period of twelve months following such termination; an amount equal to the most recent annual bonus he received prior to the date of termination; and any previously vested stock options and accrued benefits, such as retirement benefits, in accordance with the terms of the plan or agreement pursuant to which such options or benefits were granted. Mr. Mitchell’s equity-based or performance-based awards will become fully vested and exercisable upon such termination or resignation and Mr. Mitchell may choose to continue to participate in the Company’s benefit plan for a period of twelve months from the date of such termination.its Compensation Committee.

~~CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~In thousands, except share and per share data~~

of base salary payable six months after the date of such six month period, and any benefits payable to Mr. Mitchell and or his beneficiaries in accordance with the terms of any applicable benefit plan.

In the event Mr. Mitchell’s employment is terminated by the Company for cause or under a voluntary termination (as defined in the agreement), Mr. Mitchell will receive: accrued base salary through the date of termination; and any previously vested rights under a stock option or similar incentive compensation plan in accordance with the terms of such plan.

Unless Mr. Mitchell’s employment is terminated by us for cause or under a voluntary termination, Mr. Mitchell will also be entitled, for a period of five years, to tax preparation assistance upon termination of his employment. The employment agreement contains various covenants, including covenants related to confidentiality, non-competition (other than certain permitted activities as defined therein) and non-solicitation.

~~Tandy Mitchell, Alan Stock, Robert Copple, Timothy Warner, Robert Carmony, John Lundin and Michael Cavalier~~

The Company entered into executive employment agreements with each of Tandy Mitchell, Alan Stock, Robert Copple, Timothy Warner, Robert Carmony, John Lundin and Michael Cavalier pursuant to which Mrs. Mitchell and Messrs. Stock, Copple, Warner, Carmony, Lundin and Cavalier currently serve, respectively, as the Company’s Executive Vice President, Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer, Senior Vice President — New Technology and Training, Vice President of Film Licensing and Senior Vice President — General Counsel. The employment agreements became effective upon the consummation of the MDP Merger. The initial term of each employment agreement is three years, subject to automatic extensions for a one-year period at the end of each year of the term, unless the agreement is terminated. Pursuant to the employment agreements, each of these individuals receives a base salary, which is subject to annual review for increase (but not decrease) each year by the Company’s board of directors or committee or delegate thereof. In addition, each of these executives is eligible to receive an annual cash incentive bonus upon the Company’s meeting certain performance targets established by the Company’s board of directors or the compensation committee for the fiscal year.

The Company’s board of directors has adopted a stock option plan and granted each executive stock options to acquire such number of shares as set forth in that executive’s employment agreement. The executive’s stock options vest and become exercisable twenty percent per year on a daily pro rata basis and shall be fully vested and exercisable five years after the date of the grant, as long as the executive remains continuously employed by the Company. Upon consummation of a sale of the Company, the executive’s stock options will accelerate and become fully vested.

The employment agreement with each executive provides for severance payments on substantially the same terms as the employment agreement for Mr. Mitchell. Each executive will also be entitled to office space and support services for a period of not more than three months following the date of any termination except for termination for cause. The employment agreements contain various covenants, including covenants related to confidentiality, non-competition and non-solicitation.

Retirement Savings Plan— The Company has a 401(k) retirement savings plan for the benefit of all employees and makes contributions as determined annually by the board of directors. Contribution payments of ~~$1,295~~$1,795 and ~~$1,430~~$1,834 were made in ~~2006~~2008 (for plan year ~~2005)~~2007) and ~~2007~~2009 (for plan year ~~2006)~~2008), respectively. A liability of approximately ~~$1,795~~$2,083 has been recorded at December 31, ~~2007~~2009 for contribution payments to be made in ~~2008~~2010 (for plan year ~~2007)~~2009).

~~Letters of Credit and Collateral~~~~— The Company had outstanding letters of credit of $69, in connection with property and liability insurance coverage, at December 31, 2006 and 2007.~~

Litigation and Litigation Settlements— DOJ Litigation — In March 1999, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) filed suit in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, against the Company alleging certain

~~F-34~~

~~CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~In thousands, except share and per share data~~

violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (the “ADA”) relating to the Company’s wheelchair seating arrangements and seeking remedial action. An order granting summary judgment to the Company was issued in November 2001. The Department of Justice appealed the district court’s ruling with the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. On November 7, 2003, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the summary judgment and sent the case back to the district court for further review without deciding whether wheelchair seating at the Company’s theatres comply with the ADA. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals also stated that if the district court found that the theatres did not comply with the ADA, any remedial action should be prospective only. The Company and the United States have resolved this lawsuit. A consent order was entered by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, on November 15, 2004. This consent order fully and finally resolves theUnited States v. Cinemark USA, Inc. lawsuit, and all claims asserted against the Company in that lawsuit have been dismissed with prejudice. Under the consent order, the Company ~~will make~~made modifications to wheelchair seating locations in fourteen stadium-style movie theatres, and spacing and companion seating modifications at 67 auditoriums at other stadium-styled movie theatres. These modifications ~~must be~~were completed by November 2009. Upon completion of these modifications, such theatres ~~will comply~~complied with all existing and pending ADA wheelchair seating requirements, and no further modifications will be required to the Company’s other stadium-style movie theatres in the United States existing on the date of the consent order. Under the consent order, the DOJ approved the seating plans for nine stadium-styled movie theatres under construction. The Company and the DOJ have also created a safe harbor framework for the Company to construct all of its future stadium-style movie theatres. The DOJ has stipulated that all theatres built in compliance with the consent order will comply with the wheelchair seating requirements of the ADA. The Company believes that its obligations under the consent order are not material in the aggregate to its financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

F-36

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In thousands, except share and per share data

~~Financial Information About Geographic Areas~~

We have operations in the U.S., Canada, Mexico, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Ecuador, Peru, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama and Colombia, which are reflected in the consolidated financial statements. Below is a breakdown of select financial information by geographic area:

Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended
December 31, December 31, December 31,
2005 2006 2007

Revenues

U.S. and Canada $ 757,902 $ 936,684 $ 1,352,042
Mexico 74,919 71,589 74,983
Brazil 112,182 128,555 157,158
Other foreign countries 77,213 85,710 101,483
Eliminations (1,619 ) (1,944 ) (2,825 )

Total $ 1,020,597 $ 1,220,594 $ 1,682,841

December 31, December 31,
2006 2007

Theatres properties and equipment, net

U.S. and Canada $ 1,169,456 $ 1,137,244
Mexico 51,272 59,201
Brazil 55,749 72,635
Other foreign countries 48,095 44,986

Total $ 1,324,572 $ 1,314,066

~~23. OTHER~~24. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company leases one theatre from Plitt Plaza Joint Venture (“Plitt Plaza”) on a month-to-month basis. Plitt Plaza is indirectly owned by Lee Roy ~~Mitchell.~~Mitchell, the Company’s Chairman of the Board, who owns approximately 12% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock. Annual rent is approximately $118 plus certain taxes, maintenance expenses and insurance. The Company recorded ~~$152, $149~~$120, $127 and ~~$120~~$118 of facility lease and other operating expenses payable to Plitt Plaza joint venture during the years ended December 31, ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 and ~~2007,~~2009, respectively.

The Company manages one theatre for Laredo Theatre, Ltd. (“Laredo”). The Company is the sole general partner and owns 75% of the limited partnership interests of Laredo. Lone Star Theatres, Inc. owns the remaining 25% of the limited partnership interests in Laredo and is 100% owned by Mr. David Roberts, Lee Roy Mitchell’s son-in-law. Under the agreement, management fees are paid by Laredo to the Company at a rate of 5% of annual theatre revenues up to $50,000 and 3% of annual theatre revenues in excess of $50,000. The Company recorded ~~$201, $191~~$82, $92 and ~~$82~~$102 of management fee revenues during the years ended December 31, ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 and ~~2007, respectively, and received $675, $600 and $0 of distributions from Laredo during the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007,~~2009, respectively. All such amounts are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements with the intercompany amounts eliminated in consolidation.

The Company has an Aircraft Time Sharing Agreement with Copper Beech Capital, LLC to use, on occasion, a private aircraft owned by Copper Beech Capital, LLC. Copper Beech Capital, LLC is owned by Mr. Mitchell and his wife, Tandy Mitchell. The private aircraft is used by Mr. Mitchell and other executives who accompany Mr. Mitchell to business meetings for the Company. The Company reimburses Copper Beech Capital, LLC the actual costs of fuel usage and the expenses of the pilots, landing fees, storage fees and similar expenses incurred during the trip. For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009, the aggregate amounts paid to Copper Beech Capital, LLC for the use of the aircraft was approximately $136 and $64, respectively.

The Company leases 2523 theatres and two parking facilities from Syufy Enterprises, LP (“Syufy”) or affiliates of Syufy, which owns approximately 8%6% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock. Raymond Syufy is one of the Company’s directors and is an officer of the general partner of Syufy. Of these 2723 leases, 2220 have fixed minimum annual rent in an aggregate amount of approximately $23,280. Of these 22 leases with fixed minimum annual rent, 17 have a remaining lease term plus extension option(s) that exceed 30 years, four have a remaining lease term plus extension option(s) that exceed 17 years, and one has a remaining lease term of approximately two years. Three

~~F-37~~

~~CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~In thousands, except share and per share data~~

of these 22 leases have triggering events that allow the Company to convert the fixed minimum rent to a fixed percentage of gross sales as defined in the lease with the further right to terminate the lease if the theatre level cash flow drops below $0. Five of these 22 leases have triggering events that allow the Company to terminate the lease prior to expiration of the term.$21,791. The ~~five~~three leases without minimum annual rent have rent based upon a specified percentage of gross sales as defined in the lease with no minimum annual rent. ~~Four of these~~For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, the Company paid approximately $1,185, $1,078 and $1,087, respectively, in percentage rent ~~leases expire in approximately nine months but have automatic 12 month renewal options, and the Company has the right to terminate the leases if theatre level cash flow drops below $0. One of~~for these ~~percentage rent leases has a remaining term of 9 months and Syufy has the right to terminate this lease prior to the end of the term.~~

The Company also has an office lease with Syufy for corporate office space in San Rafael, California. The lease will expire in September 2008. The lease has a fixed minimum annual rent of approximately $300.leases.

The Company entered into an amended and restated profit participation agreement on March 12, 2004 with its CEO, Alan Stock, which became effective on April 2, 2004, and amended the profit participation agreement with Mr. Stock in effect since May 2002. Under the agreement, Mr. Stock received a profit interest in two theatres once the Company recovered its capital investment in these theatres plus its borrowing costs. During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company recorded $114 in profit participation expense payable to Mr. Stock, which is included in general and administrative expenses on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations. After the Company’s initial public offering of common stock in April 2007, the Company exercised its option to terminate the amended and restated profit participation agreement and purchased Mr. Stock’s interest in the theatres on May 3, 2007 for a price of $6,853 pursuant to the terms of the agreement. The Company also paid payroll taxes of approximately $99 related to the payment made to terminate the amended and restated profit participation agreement. The aggregate amount paid of $6,952 is reflected within cost of operations in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2007 and the agreement with Mr. Stock has been terminated.

Prior to the completion of the Century Acquisition, Century Theatres, Inc. owned certain shares of Fandango, Inc., an on-line ticketing distributor. In connection with the Century Acquisition, the Company agreed to pay Syufy the cash proceeds received by the Company in connection with any sale of such shares of Fandango, Inc. up to a maximum amount of $2,800. As discussed in Note 9, the Company sold all of its shares of Fandango, Inc. stock during May 2007 for approximately $14,147 of consideration and paid $2,800 of the cash consideration to Syufy in accordance with the Century Acquisition agreement.

~~24. VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS~~

~~The Company’s valuation allowance for deferred tax assets for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 were as follows:~~

Valuation Allowance
for Deferred
Tax Assets
Balance at January 1, 2005 $ 7,383
Additions 2,232
Deductions (2,680 )

Balance at December 31, 2005 $ 6,935
Additions 4,225
Deductions (2,298 )

Balance at December 31, 2006 $ 8,862
Additions 2,370
Deductions (1,360 )

Balance at December 31, 2007 $ 9,872

~~F-38~~F-39

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In thousands, except share and per share data

~~27.~~28. SUBSEQUENT EVENT ~~– REPURCHASE~~— AMENDMENT AND EXTENSION OF SENIOR ~~DISCOUNT NOTES~~SECURED CREDIT FACILITY

On March ~~20, 2008, in one open market purchase,~~2, 2010, the Company ~~repurchased $10,000 aggregate~~completed an amendment and extension to its existing senior secured credit facility to primarily extend the maturities of the facility and make certain other modifications. Approximately $924,375 of the Company’s $1,083,600 outstanding term loan debt has been extended from an original maturity date of October 2013 to a maturity date of April 2016. Payments on the extended amount will be due in equal quarterly installments of 0.25% of the extended amount beginning March 31, 2010 through March 31, 2016 with the remaining principal amount due April 30, 2016. The interest rate on this extended portion of the term loan is, at the Company’s option, at the base rate plus 2.25% or a eurodollar rate plus 3.25%. The maturity date of, the interest rates applicable to and the quarterly payments for the remaining $159,225 of the Company’s outstanding term loan did not change.

In addition, the maturity date of $73,500 of the Company’s $150,000 revolving line of credit has been extended from October 2012 to March 2015. The interest rate on this extended portion of the revolving line of credit is, at the Company’s option, at the base rate plus a margin that ranges from 1.75% to 2.00% or a eurodollar rate plus a margin that ranges from 2.75% to 3.00%. The maturity date of and the interest rates applicable to the remaining $76,500 of the Company’s revolving line of credit did not change.

The Company incurred debt issue costs of approximately $8,600 related to this amendment and extension.

29. SUBSEQUENT EVENT — EARTHQUAKE IN CHILE

On February 27, 2010, an 8.8 magnitude earthquake occurred in Chile, a country in which the Company has eleven theatres, a local corporate office and approximately 800 employees. For the year ended December 31, 2009, revenues generated by the Company’s Chile locations were 1.6% of the Company’s total revenues. The Company has property and business interruption insurance for its Chile locations. The insurance policy covers earthquake damage up to a specified limit with applicable deductibles per location. The Company expects to reopen seven of its theatres within the next week and is continuing to assess the level and nature of the damage to its other four theatres.

30. SUBSEQUENT EVENT — DCIP

On March 10, 2010, the Company signed a master equipment lease agreement and other related agreements (collectively the “agreements”) with Kasima, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company’s joint venture DCIP and a related party to the Company. Upon signing the agreements, the Company contributed cash of $1,201 and its existing digital equipment at a fair value of $16,380 to DCIP (collectively the “contributions”). The net book value of the contributed equipment was approximately $18,138, and as a result, the Company will record a loss of approximately $1,758 during the three months ending March 31, 2010. Subsequent to the contributions, the Company continues to have a 33% voting interest in DCIP and now has a 24.3% economic interest in DCIP.

As a result of these agreements, the Company will begin a rollout of 3-D compatible digital projection systems to a majority of its first run U.S. theatres. The digital projection systems will be leased from Kasima under a twelve-year lease that contains ten one-year fair value renewal options. The equipment lease agreement also contains a fair value purchase option. Under the equipment lease agreement, the Company will pay minimum annual rent of one thousand dollars per digital projection system for the first six and a half years from the effective date of the agreement and minimum annual rent of three thousand dollars per digital projection system beginning at six and a half years from the effective date through the end of the lease term. The Company is also subject to various types of other rent if such projection systems do not meet minimum performance requirements as outlined in the agreements. Certain of the other rent payments are subject to either a monthly or an annual maximum.

The Company has a variable interest in Kasima, however the Company has concluded that it is not the primary beneficiary of Kasima. The Company will continue to account for its investment in DCIP and its subsidiaries under the equity method of accounting due to its continued 33% voting interest in DCIP.

The digital projection systems leased from Kasima will replace a majority of the Company’s existing 35 millimeter projection systems in its U.S. theatres. Therefore, the Company will accelerate the depreciation of these existing 35 millimeter projections systems over the next two years, based on the estimated timeframe in which they will be replaced. The net book value of the existing 35 millimeter projection systems to be replaced was approximately $17,700 as of December 31, 2009.

F-41

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC.
PARENT COMPANY STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007, 2008 AND 2009
(In thousands)


																			Total
																Accumulated			Cinemark
	Common Stock				Treasury Stock						Additional		Retained			Other			Holdings, Inc.
	Shares				Shares						Paid-in-		Earnings			Comprehensive			Stockholders’			Comprehensive
	Issued		Amount		Issued			Amount			Capital		(Deficit)			Income (Loss)			Equity			Income (Loss)

Balance at January 1, 2007		92,561	$	93		—		$	—		$	685,433	$	(7,692	)	$	11,463		$	689,297

Tax adjustment related to the adoption of paragraph 10 of ASC Topic 740 (formerly FIN 48) related to uncertain tax positions														(1,093	)					(1,093	)
Issuance of stock for initial public offering, net of fees		13,889		14								245,835								245,849

Issuance of restricted stock		22		—								—								—
Exercise of stock options, net of equity award repurchase		512		—								3,625								3,625
Share based awards compensation expense												200								200
Subsidiaries’ share based awards activity												4,234								4,234
Dividends paid to stockholders														(33,061	)					(33,061	)
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests																				—
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net income														88,920						88,920			88,920
Fair value adjustments on interest rate swap agreements, net of taxes of $7,074																	(11,348	)		(11,348	)		(11,348	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment																	32,580			32,580			32,580


Balance at December 31, 2007		106,984	$	107		—		$	—		$	939,327	$	47,074		$	32,695		$	1,019,203		$	110,152


Issuance of restricted stock, net of restricted stock forfeitures		385		—																—
Exercise of stock options		169		—								1,292								1,292
Share based awards compensation expense												474								474
Subsidiaries’ share based awards activity												5,113								5,113
Issuance of shares as a result of Central America share exchange		903		1								12,948								12,949
Issuance of shares as a result of Ecuador share exchange		394		1								3,199								3,200
Dividends paid to stockholders														(77,534	)					(77,534	)
Dividends accrued on unvested restricted stock awards														(74	)					(74	)
Contribution by noncontrolling interest																				—
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests																				—
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net income (loss)														(48,325	)					(48,325	)		(48,325	)
Fair value adjustments on interest rate swap agreements, net of taxes of $2,442																	(22,063	)		(22,063	)		(22,063	)
Amortization of accumulated other comprehensive loss on terminated swap agreement																	1,351			1,351			1,351
Foreign currency translation adjustment																	(84,330	)		(84,330	)		(84,330	)


Balance at December 31, 2008		108,835	$	109		—		$	—		$	962,353	$	(78,859	)	$	(72,347	)	$	811,256		$	(153,367	)

Issuance of restricted stock, net of restricted stock forfeitures		479		—		(30	)		—			—		—			—			—
Exercise of stock options, net of stock withholdings		4,908		5		(3,275	)		(43,895	)		37,442		—			—			(6,448	)
Share based awards compensation expense		—		—		—			—			500		—			—			500
Subsidiaries’ share based awards activity		—		—		—			—			11,349		—			—			11,349
Dividends paid to stockholders		—		—		—			—			—		(78,643	)		—			(78,643	)
Dividends accrued on unvested restricted stock awards		—		—		—			—			—		(201	)		—			(201	)
Purchase of noncontrolling interest share of an Argentina subsidiary		—		—		—			—			23		—			—			23
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests		—		—		—			—			—		—			—			—
Comprehensive income:																				—
Net income		—		—		—			—			—		97,108						97,108			97,108
Fair value adjustments on interest rate swap agreements, net of taxes of $2,359		—		—		—			—			—		—			3,898			3,898			3,898
Amortization of accumulated other comprehensive loss on terminated swap agreement		—		—		—			—			—		—			4,633			4,633			4,633
Foreign currency translation adjustment		—		—		—			—			—		—			56,357			56,357			56,357


Balance at December 31, 2009		114,222	$	114		(3,305	)	$	(43,895	)	$	1,011,667	$	(60,595	)	$	(7,459	)	$	899,832		$	161,996

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

F-44

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share data)

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

On August 2, 2006, Cinemark Holdings, Inc. was formed as the Delaware holding company of Cinemark, Inc. On April 24, 2007, Cinemark Holdings, Inc. completed an initial public offering of its common stock. Effective December 11, 2009, Cinemark, Inc. was merged into Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and Cinemark Holdings, Inc. became the holding company of Cinemark USA, Inc.

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. conducts substantially all of its operations through its subsidiaries. There are significant restrictions over Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s ability to obtain funds from its subsidiaries through dividends, loans or advances. Accordingly, these financial statements have been presented on a “parent-only” basis.

2. INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING OF COMMON STOCK

On April 24, 2007, the Company completed an initial public offering of its common stock. The Company sold 13,888,889 shares of its common stock and selling stockholders sold an additional 14,111,111 shares of common stock at a price of $17.955 ($19 per share less underwriting discounts). The net proceeds (before expenses) received by the Company were $249,375 and the Company paid approximately $3,526 in legal, accounting and other fees, all of which are recorded in additional paid-in-capital. The selling stockholders granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 2,800,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $17.955 ($19 per share less underwriting discounts). On May 21, 2007, the underwriters purchased an additional 269,100 shares from the selling stockholders pursuant to this option. The Company did not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling stockholders. The Company has utilized a portion of the net proceeds that it received from the offering to repurchase a portion of Cinemark, Inc.’s outstanding 9³/4% senior discount ~~notes for approximately $8,950.~~notes. See Note 14 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company ~~funded~~has significant flexibility in applying the ~~transaction with~~net proceeds from ~~its~~the initial public offering. AsThe Company has invested the remaining net proceeds in money market funds.

3. DIVIDEND PAYMENTS

In August 2007, Cinemark Holdings, Inc. initiated a ~~result~~quarterly dividend policy. Below is a summary of Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s dividend history since the initiation of this policy:


					Amount per
Date	Date of		Date		Common		Total
Declared	Record		Paid		Share⁽¹⁾		Dividends⁽²⁾
08/13/07		09/04/07		09/18/07	$	0.13	$	13,840
11/12/07		12/03/07		12/18/07	$	0.18	$	19,221

Total – 2007							$	33,061


02/26/08		03/06/08		03/14/08	$	0.18	$	19,270
05/09/08		05/30/08		06/12/08	$	0.18	$	19,353
08/07/08		08/25/08		09/12/08	$	0.18	$	19,370
11/06/08		11/26/08		12/11/08	$	0.18	$	19,615

Total – 2008							$	77,608


02/13/09		03/05/09		03/20/09	$	0.18	$	19,619
05/13/09		06/02/09		06/18/09	$	0.18	$	19,734
07/29/09		08/17/09		09/01/09	$	0.18	$	19,739
11/04/09		11/25/09		12/10/09	$	0.18	$	19,752

Total – 2009							$	78,844


⁽¹⁾		The dividend paid on September 18, 2007 was based on a quarterly dividend rate of $0.18 per common share, prorated based on the April 24, 2007 closing date of the Company’s initial public offering.

⁽²⁾		Of the dividends recorded during 2008 and 2009, $74 and $201, respectively, were related to outstanding restricted stock units and will not be paid until such units vest. See Note 19 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K.

F-46

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Members of
National CineMedia, LLC
Centennial, Colorado

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of National CineMedia, LLC (the “Company”) as of December ~~27, 2007~~31, 2009 and ~~as of December 28, 2006~~January 1, 2009, and the related statements of operations, members’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2009 and January 1, 2009, the period February 13, 2007 through December 27, 2007, and for the period December 29, 2006 through February 12, ~~2007, for the year ended December 28, 2006, and for the period March 29, 2005 through December 29, 2005.~~2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on ~~the~~these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such ~~opinion.~~ opinion.An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of ~~National CineMedia LLC~~the Company as of December ~~27, 2007~~31, 2009 and January 1, 2009, and the ~~related statements~~results of its operations ~~members’ equity (deficit)~~ and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2009 and January 1, 2009, the period February 13, 2007 through December 27, 2007, and for the period December 29, 2006 through February 12, 2007, ~~for the year ended December 28, 2006, and for the period March 29, 2005 through December 29, 2005~~ in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Denver, Colorado
March ~~21, 2008~~9, 2010

~~F-40~~F-48

NATIONAL CINEMEDIA, LLC
BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions)


						December 31, 2009			January 1, 2009
	December 27, 2007			December 28, 2006
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	7.5		$	6.7	$	37.8		$	34.1
Receivables, net of allowance of $1.5 million in 2007 and $1.1 million in 2006		91.6			63.9
Receivables, net of allowance of $3.6 and $2.6 million, respectively							89.0			92.0
Prepaid expenses		1.9			1.6		1.5			1.6
Prepaid management fees to managing member		0.5			—		0.6			0.5

Total current assets		101.5			72.2		128.9			128.2
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net of accumulated depreciation of $17.3 million in 2007 and $12.7 million in 2006		22.2			12.6
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net of accumulated depreciation of $39.3 and $27.0 million, respectively							23.7			28.0
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net of accumulated amortization of $4.4 and $1.5 million, respectively							134.2			111.8
OTHER ASSETS:
Debt issuance costs, net		13.0			0.2		9.2			11.1
Investment in affiliate		7.0			—
Restricted cash		0.3			—
Other assets		0.2			5.0
Equity method investment							7.4			—
Other long-term assets							1.0			0.8

Total other assets		20.5			5.2		17.6			11.9

TOTAL	$	144.2		$	90.0	$	304.4		$	279.9

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS’ EQUITY/(DEFICIT)
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable	$	6.6		$	5.4
Amounts due to founding members		15.8			53.9		29.8			25.6
Amounts due to managing member		16.7			—		22.9			22.1
Accrued expenses							12.4			6.3
Current portion of long-term debt							4.3			—
Accrued payroll and related expenses		7.2			6.4		6.6			5.7
Accrued expenses		10.0			5.5
Deferred revenue		3.3			3.4
Accounts payable							11.3			11.2
Deferred revenue and other current liabilities							2.8			3.4

Total current liabilities		59.6			74.6		90.1			74.3
OTHER LIABILITIES:
Unit option plan payable		—			1.9
Interest rate swap agreements and other liabilities		14.4			—
Borrowings		784.0			10.0		799.0			799.0
Interest rate swap agreements							54.6			87.7
Other long-term liabilities							0.3			4.5

Total other liabilities		798.4			11.9		853.9			891.2

Total liabilities		858.0			86.5		944.0			965.5

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTE 10)

MEMBERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)		(713.8	)		3.5
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTE 9)


MEMBERS’ EQUITY/(DEFICIT)							(639.6	)		(685.6	)



TOTAL	$	144.2		$	90.0	$	304.4		$	279.9

NATIONAL CINEMEDIA, LLC
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In ~~millions, except share and per share data)~~millions)


	Period		Period															Period			Period
	February 13,		December 29,						Period March									February 13,			December 29,
	2007 through		2006 through			Year Ended			29, 2005 through			Year Ended			Year Ended			2007 through			2006 through
	December 27,		February 12,			December 28,			December 29,			December 31,			January 1,			December 27,			February 12,
	2007		2007			2006			2005			2009			2009			2007			2007

REVENUE:
Advertising (including revenue from founding members of $40.9 and $0.0 for all remaining periods)	$	282.7	$	20.6		$	188.2		$	56.0
Advertising (including revenue from founding members of $36.3, $43.3, $40.9 and $0 million, respectively)												$	335.1		$	330.3		$	282.7		$	20.6
Administrative fees—founding members		—		0.1			5.4			30.8			—			—			—			0.1
Meetings and events		25.4		2.9			25.4			11.7
Fathom Events													45.5			38.9			25.4			2.9
Other		0.2		—			0.3			0.3			0.1			0.3			0.2			—

Total		308.3		23.6			219.3			98.8			380.7			369.5			308.3			23.6

EXPENSES:

OPERATING EXPENSES:
Advertising operating costs		9.1		1.1			9.2			6.3			20.0			18.7			9.1			1.1
Meetings and events operating costs		15.4		1.4			11.1			5.4
Fathom Events operating costs													29.1			25.1			15.4			1.4
Network costs		13.3		1.7			14.7			9.2			18.6			17.0			13.3			1.7
Theatre access fees/circuit share costs—founding members		41.5		14.4			130.1			38.6			52.7			49.8			41.5			14.4
Selling and marketing costs		40.9		5.2			38.2			24.9			50.2			47.9			40.9			5.2
Administrative costs		10.0		2.8			16.4			9.8			14.8			14.5			10.0			2.8
Administrative fee- managing member		9.2		—			—			—
Administrative fee — managing member													10.8			9.7			9.2			—
Severance plan costs		1.5		0.4			4.2			8.5			—			0.5			1.5			0.4
Depreciation and amortization		5.0		0.7			4.8			3.0			15.6			12.4			5.0			0.7
Other costs		0.9		—			0.6			—			0.7			0.7			0.9			—

Total		146.8		27.7			229.3			105.7			212.5			196.3			146.8			27.7


OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)		161.5		(4.1	)		(10.0	)		(6.9	)		168.2			173.2			161.5			(4.1	)
Interest Expense, Net		47.8		0.1			0.5			—

Interest Expense, Net:
Borrowings													47.1			51.8			48.0			0.1
Change in derivative fair value													(7.0	)		14.2			—			—
Interest income and other													(2.0	)		(0.2	)		(0.2	)		—

Total													38.1			65.8			47.8			0.1
Impairment and related loss													—			11.5			—			—


INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES													130.1			95.9			113.7			(4.2	)
Provision for Income Taxes													0.8			0.6			—			—
Equity loss from investment, net													0.8			—			—			—


NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	113.7	$	(4.2	)	$	(10.5	)		(6.9	)	$	128.5		$	95.3		$	113.7		$	(4.2	)

NATIONAL CINEMEDIA, LLC
STATEMENTS OF MEMBERS’ EQUITY/(DEFICIT)
~~AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME~~
(In ~~millions, except share data)~~millions)


		Total			Total
Members’ Equity
Balance—March 29, 2005			—
Issuance of initial units at inception date in exchange for contributed assets, net of liabilities assumed		$	0.9
Issuance of additional units in exchange for cash		$	7.3
Contribution of Severance Plan payments		$	8.5
Net loss		$	(6.9	)

Balance—December 29, 2005		$	9.8

Capital contribution from Members		$	0.9
Contribution of Severance Plan payments		$	4.2
Distribution to Members		$	(0.9	)
Net loss		$	(10.5	)

Balance—December 28, 2006		$	3.5		$	3.5

Contribution of Severance Plan payments		$	0.4
Contribution of severance plan payments						0.4
Net loss		$	(4.2	)		(4.2	)

Balance—February 12, 2007		$	(0.3	)	$	(0.3	)

	��
Members’ Equity

Balance—February 13, 2007		$	(0.3	)	$	(0.3	)
Contribution of Severance Plan payments		$	1.5
Contribution of severance plan payments						1.5
Capital contribution from managing member		$	746.1			746.1
Capital contribution from founding members		$	11.2
Capital contribution from founding member						11.2
Distribution to managing member		$	(53.3	)		(53.3	)
Distributions to founding members		$	(1,521.6	)
Distribution to founding members						(1,521.6	)
Reclassification of unit option plan		$	2.3			2.3
Comprehensive Income:
Unrealized (loss) on cash flow hedge		$	(14.4	)		(14.4	)
Net income		$	113.7			113.7

Total Comprehensive Income, net of tax		$	99.3
Total Comprehensive Income						99.3

Share-based compensation expense		$	1.0			1.0

Balance—December 27, 2007		$	(713.8	)	$	(713.8	)


Contribution of severance plan payments						0.5
Capital contribution from managing member						0.6
Capital contribution from founding members						4.7
Distribution to managing member						(55.5	)
Distribution to founding members						(75.5	)
Units issued for purchase of intangible asset						116.1
Comprehensive Income:
Unrealized (loss) on cash flow hedge						(59.1	)
Net income						95.3

Total Comprehensive Income						36.2
Share-based compensation expense						1.1

Balance—January 1, 2009					$	(685.6	)


Capital contribution from founding members						0.1
Distribution to managing member						(57.8	)
Distribution to founding members						(81.5	)
Units issued for purchase of intangible asset						28.5
Comprehensive Income:
Unrealized (loss) on cash flow hedge						26.1
Net income						128.5

Total Comprehensive Income						154.6
Share-based compensation expense						2.1

Balance—December 31, 2009					$	(639.6	)

NATIONAL CINEMEDIA, LLC
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)


	Period			Period															Period			Period
	February 13,			December 29,						Period March									February 13,			December 29,
	2007 through			2006 through			Year Ended			29, 2005 through			Year Ended			Year Ended			2007 through			2006 through
	December 27,			February 12,			December 28,			December 29,			December 31,			January 1,			December 27,			February 12,
	2007			2007			2006			2005			2009			2009			2007			2007

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income(loss)	$	113.7		$	(4.2	)	$	(10.5	)	$	(6.9	)
Net income (loss)													$	128.5		$	95.3		$	113.7		$	(4.2	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		5.0			0.7			4.8			3.0			15.6			12.4			5.0			0.7
Non-cash severance plan and share-based compensation		2.5			0.7			6.1			8.0			2.0			1.5			2.5			0.7
Amortization of debt issuance costs and loss on repayment of debt		1.7			—			—			—
Non-cash impairment and related loss														—			11.5			—			—
Net unrealized hedging transactions														(7.0	)		14.2			—			—
Equity in losses from investment														0.8			—			—			—
Amortization of debt issuance costs														1.9			1.9			1.7			—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in receivables—net		(40.3	)		12.6			(27.3	)		(36.6	)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses		10.4			(4.4	)		4.4			8.2
(Decrease) increase in amounts due to founding members and managing member		(51.1	)		(3.7	)		33.4			20.5
Payment of severance plan costs		—			—			(3.5	)		—
Increase (decrease)in other		(1.3	)		0.5			0.9			0.9
Receivables—net														3.0			(0.4	)		(40.3	)		12.6
Accounts payable and accrued expenses														6.9			(0.7	)		10.4			(4.4	)
Amounts due to founding members and managing member														1.2			0.4			(51.1	)		(3.7	)
Other														(3.5	)		0.1			(1.3	)		0.5

Net cash provided by operating activities		40.6			2.2			8.3			(2.9	)		149.4			136.2			40.6			2.2

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of property and equipment		(13.8	)		(0.5	)		(6.3	)		(5.9	)		(8.4	)		(16.6	)		(13.8	)		(0.5	)
Investment in restricted cash		(0.3	)		—			—			—
Increase in investment in affiliate		(7.0	)		—			—			—			(2.0	)		—			(7.0	)		—
Other														—			—			(0.3	)		—

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(21.1	)		(0.5	)		(6.3	)		(5.9	)
Net cash (used in) investing activities														(10.4	)		(16.6	)		(21.1	)		(0.5	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Reimbursement (payment) of offering costs and fees		4.7			(0.1	)		(4.0	)		—			—			—			4.7			(0.1	)
Proceeds of short-term borrowings from founding members		—			—			3.0			9.5
Repayments of short-term borrowings to founding members		—			—			(4.3	)		(8.2	)
Proceeds from borrowings		924.0			13.0			66.0			—			—			139.0			924.0			13.0
Repayments of borrowings		(150.0	)		(13.0	)		(56.0	)		—			(3.0	)		(124.0	)		(150.0	)		(13.0	)
Payment of debt issuance costs		(14.6	)		—			—			—
Proceeds from issuance of units		—			—			—			7.3
Contributions from managing member		746.1			—			—			—
Proceeds from managing member contributions														—			0.6			746.1			—
Proceeds from founding member contributions		7.5			—			0.9			0.2			3.6			9.7			7.5			—
Distribution to founding members and managing member		(1,538.0	)		—			(0.9	)		—			(135.9	)		(118.3	)		(1,538.0	)		—
Payment of debt issuance costs														—			—			(14.6	)		—

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(20.3	)		(0.1	)		4.7			8.8
Net cash (used in) financing activities.														(135.3	)		(93.0	)		(20.3	)		(0.1	)

(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(0.8	)		1.6			6.7			—
CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS														3.7			26.6			(0.8	)		1.6
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
Beginning of period		8.3			6.7			—			—			34.1			7.5			8.3			6.7

End of period	$	7.5		$	8.3		$	6.7		$	—		$	37.8		$	34.1		$	7.5		$	8.3

NATIONAL CINEMEDIA LLC
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. THE COMPANY AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

~~Description~~Formation of Business

National CineMedia, LLC (“NCM LLC” or ~~the “Company”~~“the Company”) commenced operations on April 1, 2005 and operates the largest digital in-theatre network in North America, ~~that allows~~allowing NCM LLC to distribute advertising, ~~business~~Fathom Business meeting services, and Fathom ~~event~~Consumer entertainment services under long-term exhibitor services agreements (“ESAs”) with American Multi-Cinema, Inc. (“AMC”), a wholly owned subsidiary of AMC Entertainment, Inc. (“AMCE”), Regal Cinemas, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Regal Entertainment Group (“Regal”), and Cinemark USA, Inc. (“Cinemark USA”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Cinemark Holdings, Inc. (“Cinemark”). AMC, Regal and Cinemark and their affiliates are referred to in this document as “founding members”. NCM LLC also provides such services to certain third-party theater circuits under ~~Network Affiliate Agreements~~multi-year network affiliate agreements, which expire at various dates.

NCM LLC was formed through the combination of the operations of National Cinema Network, Inc. (“NCN”), a wholly owned subsidiary of AMCE, and Regal CineMedia Corporation (“RCM”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Regal. In accordance with the Contribution and Unit Holders Agreement entered into on that date by NCM LLC, NCN, and RCM, 16,387,670 units were issued to NCN and 27,903,330 units were issued to Regal CineMedia Holdings, LLC (“RCM Holdings”) in exchange for the contribution of $0.9 million of cash and other assets, net of liabilities assumed. All assets contributed to and liabilities assumed by NCM LLC were recorded on NCM LLC’s accounting records in the amounts as reflected on the Members’ historic accounting records, based on the application of accounting principles ~~for the formation of a joint venture~~as provided in ASC Topic 805-Business Combinations(formerly under Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) ~~98-4,~~98—4,Accounting by a Joint Venture for Businesses Received at its Formation). Although legally structured as a limited liability company, NCM LLC was considered a joint venture for accounting purposes given the joint control provisions of the operating agreement among the members, consistent with ASC Topic 323 —Investments — Equity Method and Joint Venture(formerly Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 18,The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock).

On RCM and NCN are each considered to be predecessors of NCM LLC. Cinemark became a founding member on July 15, 2005 ~~in exchange for a cash contribution of $7.3 million, 11,559,951~~through units, which were issued to Cinemark Media, Inc. (“Cinemark Media”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Cinemark USA, Inc.

~~As the result of final adjustments to the valuations attributed to the contributed assets~~Initial Public Offering and liabilities resulting from AMCE’s merger on December 23, 2004, with Marquee Holdings Inc., NCN contributed additional cash to NCM LLC during 2006, which was then distributed to RCM Holdings and Cinemark Media, thus having no impact on the assets and liabilities of NCM LLC.Related Transactions

On February 13, 2007, National CineMedia, Inc. (“NCM, Inc.” or “managing member”), a Company formed by NCM LLC and incorporated in the State of Delaware with the sole purpose of becoming a member and sole manager of NCM LLC, closed its initial public offering (“IPO”). NCM, Inc. used the net proceeds from ~~the~~its IPO to purchase a 44.8% interest in NCM LLC, paying NCM LLC $746.1 million, which included reimbursement to NCM LLC for expenses itthe Company advanced related to the NCM, Inc. IPO and paying the founding members $78.5 million for a portion of the NCM LLC units owned by them. NCM LLC paid $686.3 million of the funds received from NCM, Inc. to the founding members as consideration for their agreement to modify the then-existing ESAs. Proceeds received by NCM LLC from NCM, Inc. of $59.8 million, together with $709.7 million net proceeds from NCM LLC’s new senior secured credit facility (see Note 7)6), entered into concurrently with the completion of NCM, Inc.’s IPO were used to redeem $769.5 million in NCM LLC preferred units held by the founding members. The preferred units were created immediately prior to the NCM, Inc. IPO in a non-cash recapitalization of each membership unit into one common unit and one preferred unit. Immediately prior to this non-cash recapitalization, the existing common units and employee unit options (see Note 8)7) were split on a 44,291-to-1 basis. All unit and per unit amounts in these financial statements reflect the impact of this split.

At December ~~27, 2007,~~31, 2009, NCM LLC had ~~93,850,951~~101,557,505 membership units outstanding, of which ~~42,000,000 (44.8%~~42,121,747 (41.5%) were owned by NCM, Inc., ~~21,230,712 (22.6%~~25,425,689 (25.0%) were owned by RCM, ~~17,474,890 (18.6%~~18,821,114 (18.5%) were owned by AMC, and ~~13,145,349 (14.0%~~15,188,955 (15.0%) were owned by Cinemark.

In connection with the completion of the NCM, Inc.’s IPO, NCM, Inc. and the founding members entered into a third amended and restated limited liability company operating agreement of NCM LLC (“LLC Operating Agreement”). Under the LLC Operating Agreement, NCM, Inc. became a member and the sole manager of NCM LLC. As the sole manager, NCM, Inc. is able to control all of the day to day business affairs and decision-making of NCM LLC without the approval of any other member. NCM, Inc. cannot be removed as manager of NCM LLC. NCM LLC entered into a management services agreement with NCM, Inc. pursuant to which NCM, Inc. agrees to provide certain specific management services to NCM LLC, including those services typically provided by the individuals serving in the positions of president and chief executive officer, president of sales and chief marketing officer, executive vice president

~~F-46~~

NATIONAL CINEMEDIA LLC
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~Under the amended and restated~~The ESAs with the founding members ~~subject~~were amended and restated in conjunction with the NCM, Inc. IPO. Subject to limited exceptions, under the ESAs NCM LLC is the exclusive provider of advertising services to the founding members for a 30-year term (with a five-year right of first refusal commencing one year before the end of the term) beginning February 13, 2007 and ~~meetings and event~~Fathom Events services to the founding members for an initial five-year term, with an automatic five-year renewal providing certain financial tests are met. In exchange for the right to provide these services to the founding members, NCM LLC is required to pay to the founding members a theatre access fee which is a specified calculation based on the attendance at the founding member theatres and the number of digital screens in founding member theatres. Prior to the NCM, Inc. IPO, NCM LLC paid to the founding members a percentage of NCM LLC’s advertising revenue as advertising circuit share. Upon the completion of the NCM, Inc. IPO, the founding members assigned to NCM LLC all “legacy contracts”, which are generally contracts for advertising sold by the founding members prior to the formation of NCM LLC but which were unfulfilled at the date of formation. In addition, the founding members made additional time available for sale by NCM LLC, subject to a first right to purchase the time, if needed, by the founding members to fulfill advertising obligations with their in-theatre beverage concessionaries. ~~NCM, Inc. also entered into employment agreements with five executive officers to carry out obligations entered into pursuant to a management services agreement between NCM, Inc. and NCM LLC.~~

Basis of Presentation

The Company has prepared its financial statements ~~contained herein were prepared~~and related notes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of ~~America.~~America (“GAAP”) and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

The Company’s historical financial data may not be indicative of the Company’s future performance nor will such data reflect what its financial position and results of operations would have been had it operated as an independent company during the entirety of all periods presented. NCM, Inc.’s IPO was completed in February 2007. In addition, as a result of the various related-party agreements discussed in Note 5, the operating results as presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that might have occurred if all agreements were with non-related third parties.

The founding members received all of the proceeds from NCM, Inc.’s IPO and the related issuance of debt, except for amounts needed to pay out-of-pocket costs of the financings and other expenses, and $10.0 million to repay outstanding amounts under NCM LLC’s then-existing revolving line of credit agreement. In conformity with accounting guidance of the SEC concerning monetary consideration paid to promoters, such as the founding members, in exchange for property conveyed by the promoters, the excess over predecessor cost was treated as a special distribution. Because the founding members had no cost basis in the ESAs, all payments to the founding members with the proceeds of NCM Inc.’s IPO and related debt, amounting to approximately $1.456 billion, have been accounted for as distributions, except for the payments to liquidate accounts payable to the founding members arising from the ESAs. The distributions by NCM LLC to the founding members made at the date of NCM, Inc.’s IPO resulted in a stockholders’ deficit.

The results of operations for the period ended December 27, 2007 are presented in two periods, reflecting operations prior to and subsequent to ~~the~~ NCM, Inc.’s IPO. The period from December 29, 2006 through February 12, 2007 is referred to as the “2007 pre-IPO period”. The period from February 13, 2007 through December 27, 2007 is referred to as the “2007 post-IPO period”. Separate periods have been presented because there were significant changes at the time of ~~the~~NCM, Inc.’s IPO ~~of NCM, Inc. due~~including modifications to the ~~ESA modifications~~ESAs and related expenses thereunder, and significant changes to revenue arrangements and contracts with the founding members.

The financial statements for both the 2007 pre-IPO period and 2007 post-IPO period give effect to allocations of revenues and expenses made using relative percentages of founding member attendance or days in each period, discrete events and other methods management considered ~~to be~~ a reasonable reflection of the results for such periods.

The Company has established various accounting policies that govern the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America in the preparation and presentation of NCM LLC’s financial statements. Certain accounting policies involve significant judgments, assumptions and estimates by management that have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities, which management considers critical accounting policies. The judgments, assumptions and estimates used by management are based on historical experience, knowledge of the accounts and other factors, which are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances and are evaluated on an ongoing basis. Because of the nature of the judgments and assumptions made by management, actual results could differ from these judgments and estimates, which could have a material impact on the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the results of operations of NCM LLC. As a result of the various related-party agreements discussed above and in Note 6, the operating results as presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have occurred if all agreements were with non-related third parties.

The founding members received all of the proceeds NCM LLC received from NCM, Inc. at the date of NCM, Inc.’s IPO and the related issuance of debt, except for amounts needed to pay out-of-pocket costs of the financings and other expenses, and $10.0 million to repay outstanding amounts under NCM LLC’s then-existing revolving line of credit agreement. In conformity with accounting guidance of Securities and Exchange Commission concerning monetary consideration paid to promoters, such as the founding members, in exchange for property conveyed by the promoters and because the founding members had no cost basis in the ESAs, all payments to the founding members with the proceeds of the managing member’s IPO and related debt issuance, amounting to approximately $1.456 billion, have been accounted for as distributions, except for the payments to liquidate accounts payable to the founding members arising from the ESAs.

~~F-47~~

NATIONAL CINEMEDIA LLC
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

periods, that portion of the revenue earned is recognized in that period. Deferred revenue refers to the unearned portion of advertising contracts. All deferred revenue is classified as a current liability. ~~Meetings and events~~Fathom Events revenue is recognized in the period in which the event is held. NCM LLC considers estimates regarding make-good provisions in advertising revenue to be a critical accounting policy that requires complicated mathematical calculations used in the preparation of its financial statements. Legacy contracts are advertising contracts with the founding members prior to the formation of NCM LLC, which were not assigned to NCM LLC until the NCM, Inc. IPO was completed. Administrative fees earned by the Company prior to the NCM, Inc. IPO for its services in fulfilling the legacy contracts were based on a percentage of legacy contract revenue (32% during the 2007 pre-IPO period and 2006, and 35% during 2005, respectively).

Operating Costs—Advertising-related operating costs primarily include personnel and other costs related to advertising fulfillment, and to a lesser degree, production costs of non-digital advertising, and payments due to unaffiliated ~~theatres~~theatre circuits under the ~~“Network Affiliate Agreements.”~~network affiliate agreements.

~~Meeting and event~~Fathom Events operating costs include equipment rental, catering, movie tickets acquired primarily from the founding members, revenue share under the amended and restated ESAs and other direct costs of the meeting or event.

In the 2007 pre-IPO period and prior periods, circuit share costs were fees payable to the founding members for the right to exhibit advertisements within the theatres, based on a percentage of advertising revenue. In the 2007 post-IPO period and subsequent periods, under the amended and restated ESAs, a payment to the founding members of a theatre access fee, in lieu of circuit share expense, comprised of a payment per theatre attendee and a payment per digital screen, both of which escalate over time, is reflected in expense.

Network costs include personnel, satellite bandwidth, repairs, and other costs of maintaining and operating the digital network and preparing advertising and other content for transmission across the digital network. These costs ~~relate primarily to~~are not specifically allocable between the advertising business and ~~to a lesser extent to~~ the ~~meetings and events~~Fathom Events business.

Leases—The Company leases various office facilities under operating leases with terms ranging from ~~month-to-month~~3 to 8 years. ~~The Company calculates~~We calculate straight-line rent expense over the initial lease term and renewals that are reasonably assured.

Advertising Costs—Costs related to advertising and other promotional expenditures are expensed as incurred. Due to the nature of ~~the~~our business, ~~the Company has~~we have an insignificant amount of advertising costs included in selling and marketing costs on the statement of operations.

Cash and Cash Equivalents—All highly liquid debt instruments and investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less are classified as cash equivalents. ~~Periodically these~~These are cash balances in a bank in excess of the federally insured limits or in the form of a money market demand account with a major financial institution.

Restricted Cash—At December ~~27, 2007,~~31, 2009 and January 1, 2009, other non-current assets included restricted cash of $0.3 million, which issecures a letter of credit used as a lease deposit on NCM LLC’s New York office.

~~Investments~~—NCM LLC considers estimates regarding fair value of the Company’s investment in the preferred stock of IdeaCast, Inc. to be a critical accounting policy that requires significant judgments, assumptions and estimates used in the preparation of its financial statements. Refer to Note 5, Investment in Affiliate.

Receivables—~~Trade accounts receivable are uncollateralized and represent a large number of geographically dispersed debtors. Refer to Note 2, Receivables.~~ Bad debts are provided for using the allowance for doubtful accounts method based on historical experience and management’s evaluation of outstanding receivables ~~and delinquencies in account balances past customary terms~~ at the end of the period. Receivables are written off when management determines amounts are uncollectible. ~~Estimating~~Trade accounts receivable are uncollateralized and represent a large number of geographically dispersed debtors. At December 31, 2009 there was one advertising agency group through which the ~~amount~~Company sources national advertising revenue representing approximately 19% of ~~allowance for doubtful accounts requires significant judgment and~~ the ~~use~~Company’s outstanding gross receivable balance; however, none of ~~estimates~~the individual contracts related to the ~~amount~~advertising agency were more than 10% of advertising revenue. At January 1, 2009, there was one client and ~~timing~~one advertising agency group through which the Company sources national advertising revenue representing approximately 10% and 20%, respectively, of ~~estimated losses based on historical loss experience, consideration~~the Company’s outstanding gross receivable balance; however, none of ~~current economic trends~~the individual contracts related to the advertising agency were more than 10% of advertising revenue. The collectability risk is reduced by dealing with large, national advertising agencies and ~~conditions~~clients who have strong reputations in the advertising industry and ~~debtor-specific factors, all~~stable financial positions.

Receivables consisted of ~~which may be~~the following, in millions:


	As of December 31,			As of January 1,
	2009			2009

Trade accounts	$	91.6		$	92.4
Other		1.0			2.2
Less allowance for doubtful accounts		(3.6	)		(2.6	)

Total	$	89.0		$	92.0

~~F-48~~F-56

NATIONAL CINEMEDIA LLC
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

susceptible to significant change. To the extent actual outcomes differ from management estimates, additional provision for bad debt could be required that could adversely affect earnings or financial position in future periods.


							Period			Period
							February 13,			December 29,
	Year Ended						2007 through			2006 through
	December 31,			Year Ended			December 27,			February 12,
	2009			January 1, 2009			2007			2007

ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS:
Balance at beginning of period.	$	2.6		$	1.5		$	1.1		$	1.1
Provision for bad debt		2.4			2.3			1.0			0.1
Write-offs, net		(1.4	)		(1.2	)		(0.6	)		(0.1	)

Balance at end of period	$	3.6		$	2.6		$	1.5		$	1.1

~~Property and Equipment~~Long-lived Assets—Property and equipment is stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation or amortization. Refer to Note ~~2, Property and Equipment.~~2. Major renewals and improvements are capitalized, while replacements, maintenance, and repairs that do not improve or extend the lives of the respective assets are expensed currently. In general, the equipment associated with the digital network that is located within the theatre is owned by the founding members, while equipment outside the theatre is owned by the Company. The Company records depreciation and amortization using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:


Equipment		4-10 years
Computer hardware and software		3-5 years
Leasehold improvements		Lesser of lease term or asset life

~~The Company follows~~We account for the ~~Accounting Standards Executive Committee~~costs of software and web site development costs developed or obtained for internal use in accordance with ASC Subtopic 350-40Internal Use Software(formerly American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position (“SOP”) 98-1,Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal ~~Use.~~Use~~This SOP requires~~) and ASC Subtopic 350-50Website Development Costs(formerly EITF 00-2,Accounting for Web Site Development Costs). The subtopics require the capitalization of certain costs incurred in developing or obtaining software for internal use. The majority of ~~the~~our software costs and web site development costs, which are included in equipment, are depreciated over three to five years. As of December ~~27, 2007~~31, 2009 and ~~December 28, 2006, NCM LLC~~January 1, 2009, we had a net book value of ~~$9.3~~$11.0 million and ~~$6.1~~$11.8 million, respectively, of capitalized software and web site development costs. ~~The Company~~We recorded approximately $6.7 million, $4.9 million, $2.8 million and $0.3 million ~~$1.9 million and $0.6 million~~ for the years ended December 31, 2009, January 1, 2009, the 2007 post-IPO period and the 2007 pre-IPO period, ~~year ended December 28, 2006 and the period ended December 29, 2005,~~ respectively, in depreciation expense. As of December 31, 2009, January 1, 2009 and the 2007 post-IPO period we recorded $1.6 million, $1.2 million and $1.3 million in research and development expense, respectively.

Construction in progress includes costs relating to ~~the~~installations of our equipment into affiliate ~~installations.~~theatres. Assets under construction are not depreciated until placed into service.

~~NCM LLC’s long-lived~~Intangible assets consist ~~principally~~ of ~~property, plant~~contractual rights and ~~equipment. It is~~are stated at cost, net of accumulated amortization. Refer to Note 3. The Company records amortization using the ~~Company’s policy to~~straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the intangibles.

We assess impairment of long-lived assets pursuant with ASC Topic 360Property, Plant and Equipment(formerly SFAS No. 144,Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets) annually.This includes determining if certain triggering events have occurred including significant decreases in the market value of certain assets, significant changes in the manner in which an asset is used or its physical condition, significant changes in the legal climate or business climate that could affect the value of an asset, or current period or continuing operating or cash flow losses or projections that demonstrate continuing losses associated with certain assets used for the purpose of producing revenue that might be an indicator of impairment. When the Company performs the SFAS No. 144 impairment tests, the Company identifies the appropriate asset group as the total digital system, which includes the grouping of all of the assets required to provide service to our customers. The Company bases this conclusion of asset grouping on the revenue dependency, operating interdependency and shared costs to operate the Company’s network.asset. Thus far, ~~none of the above triggering events has resulted in any~~we have recorded no impairment ~~charges.~~charges related to long-lived assets.

Amounts Due to/from Founding Members—~~In the 2007 pre-IPO period and prior periods, amounts due to/from founding members included circuit share costs and cost reimbursements, net of the administrative fees earned on Legacy contracts.~~ Amounts due to/from founding members in the ~~2007 post-IPO period~~2009 and 2008 periods include amounts due for the theatre access fee, offset by a receivable for advertising time purchased by the founding members, as well as revenue share earned for ~~meetings and events~~Fathom Events plus any amounts outstanding under other contractually obligated payments. Payments to or received from the founding members against outstanding balances are made monthly.

Amounts Due to/from Managing Member—In the ~~2007 post-IPO period,~~2009 and 2008 periods, amounts due to/from the managing member ~~includes~~include amounts due under the NCM LLC Operating Agreement and other contractually obligated payments. Payments to or received from the managing member against outstanding balances are made periodically.

~~Network Affiliate Agreements~~Income Taxes——Network affiliate agreements were contributed at NCM LLC’s formation at the net book value of the founding members and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the agreement. These agreements require payment to the affiliate of a percentage of the advertising revenue associated with the advertisements played in affiliate theatres, and also specify minimum payments that must be made. Amortization expense related to the network affiliate agreements was $0.2 million, $0.1 million, $0.8 million and $1.2 million for the 2007 post-IPO period, 2007 pre-IPO period, year ended December 28, 2006 and the period ended December 29, 2005, respectively.

~~Income Taxes~~—As a limited liability company, NCM LLC’s taxable income or loss is allocated to the founding members and managing member and, therefore, nothe only provision ~~or liability~~ for income taxes is included in the financial ~~statements.~~statements is for income-based state and local taxes.

~~F-49~~F-57

NATIONAL CINEMEDIA LLC
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~Interest Rate Swap~~Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/Loss—~~NCM LLC has entered into interest rate swap agreements which qualify for and have been designated as a cash flow hedge against interest rate exposure on $550.0 million~~Accumulated other comprehensive income/loss is composed of the ~~variable rate debt obligations under the senior secured credit facility in accordance with SFAS No. 133,~~~~Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,~~as amended by SFAS No. 138. The interest rate swap agreements have the effect of converting a portion of the variable rate debt to a fixed rate of 6.734%. Both at inception and on an on-going basis the Company performs an effectiveness test using the hypothetical derivative method. The fair value of the interest rate swap is recorded on the Company’s balance sheet as an asset or liability with the change in fair value recorded in other comprehensive income since the instruments were determined to be perfectly effective at December 27, 2007. There were no amounts reclassified into current earnings due to ineffectiveness during the periods presented. The fair value of the Company’s interest rate swap is based on dealer quotes, and represents an estimate of the amount the Company would receive or pay to terminate the agreements taking into consideration various factors, including current interest rates and the forward yield curve for 3-month LIBOR.following (in millions):

(in millions)
Fair value of swap at inception $ —
Change in fair value — interest rate changes (14.4 )

Fair value of swap (liability) at December 27, 2007 $ (14.4 )

The Company will not use financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes, nor will the Company be a party to any leveraged derivative instrument. The use of derivative financial instruments is monitored through regular communication with senior management. The Company will be exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counter parties. This credit risk is minimized by dealing with a group of major financial institutions with whom the Company has other financial relationships. The Company does not anticipate nonperformance by these counter parties.


							Period
							February 13, 2007
	Year Ended						through
	Dec. 31,			Year Ended			December 27,
	2009			Jan. 1, 2009			2007

Beginning Balance	$	(73.5	)	$	(14.4	)	$	—
Change in fair value on cash flow hedge		24.8			(59.5	)		(14.4	)
Reclassifications into earnings		1.3			0.4			—

Ending Balance	$	(47.4	)	$	(73.5	)	$	(14.4	)

Debt Issuance Costs—In relation to the issuance of long-term debt discussed in Note ~~7, Borrowings, the Company has~~6, we have a balance of ~~$13.0~~$9.2 million and ~~$0.2~~$11.1 million in deferred financing costs as of December ~~27, 2007~~31, 2009 and ~~December 28, 2006,~~January 1, 2009, respectively. These debt issuance costs are being amortized over the terms of the underlying obligation and are included in interest expense. For the years ended December 31, 2009, January 1, 2009, 2007 post-IPO period, and the 2007 pre-IPO period ~~year ended December 28, 2006 and the period ended December 29, 2005 the Company~~we amortized ~~$1.6~~$1.9 million, ~~$0.0~~$1.9 million, ~~$0.0~~$1.7 million and $0.0, ~~million of debt issuance costs,~~ respectively.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments—The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, ~~accounts payable, accrued expenses and~~ the revolving credit facility and other notes payable as reported in the Company’s balance sheets approximate their fair values due to their short maturity or floating rate terms, as applicable. The carrying ~~amount~~amounts and fair ~~value~~values of ~~the~~ interest rate swap ~~agreement~~agreements are the same since the Company ~~recorded~~accounts for these instruments at fair value. The Company has estimated the fair value of its term loan based on an average of three non-binding broker quotes and our reasonability analysis to be $688.8 million and $514.8 million at December 31, 2009 and January 1, 2009, respectively. The carrying value of the ~~balance sheet.~~term loan was $725.0 million as of December 31, 2009 and January 1, 2009.

Equity Method Investments—The Company accounts for its investment in RMG Networks, Inc., (“RMG”) (formerly Danoo, Inc.) under the equity method of accounting as required by ASC Topic 323-10Investments — Equity Method and Joint Ventures(formerly APB No. 18,The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock) because we exert “significant influence” over, but do not control, the policy and decisions of RMG (see Note 9). As of December 31, 2009, the Company owns approximately 24% of the issued and outstanding preferred and common stock of RMG (before considering out-of-the-money warrants). The Company’s investment is $7.4 million. The investment in RMG and the Company’s share of its operating results are not material to the Company’s financial position or results of operations and as a result summarized financial information is not presented.

Share-Based Compensation—Stock-based employee compensation is accounted for at fair value under ASC Topic 718Compensation — Stock Compensation(formerly SFAS No. 123(R),Share-Based Payment). The Company adopted ~~SFAS No. 123(R)~~Topic 718 on December 30, 2005 prospectively for new equity based grants, as there were no equity based grants prior to the date of adoption. The determination of fair value of options requires that management make complex estimates and judgments. The Company utilizes the Black-Scholes option price model to estimate the fair value of the options, which model requires estimates of various factors used, including expected life of options, risk free interest rate, expected volatility and dividend yield. Refer to Note ~~8, Share-Based Compensation.~~7.

~~Estimates~~—The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates include those related to the reserve for uncollectible accounts receivable, deferred revenue, equity-based compensation and the valuation of investments in absence of market data. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

~~During September 2006,~~ASC Topic 815-10Derivatives and Hedging(formerly SFAS No. 161,Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities) was adopted by the ~~Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”~~Company effective January 2, 2009. The guidance under Topic 815-10 changes the manner of presentation and related disclosures of the fair values of derivative instruments and their gains and losses (see Note 10).

In April 2009, the Company adopted ASC Topic 820-10-65Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (formerly FASB Staff Position No. SFAS 157-4,Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly). The standard provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with Topic 820-10-65 when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased and includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate if a transaction is not orderly. The Company adopted this pronouncement effective April 3, 2009 with no impact on its financial statements.

In July 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. ~~157,~~168,The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. SFAS 168 codified all previously issued accounting pronouncements, eliminating the prior hierarchy of accounting literature, in a single source for authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. SFAS 168, now ASC Topic 105-10Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, is effective for financial statements issued for interim and

F-58

NATIONAL CINEMEDIA LLC
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have an effect on the financial statements.

The Company adopted, ASC Topic 855-10Subsequent Events(formerly SFAS 165,Subsequent Events) effective April 3, 2009, which was modified in February 2010. This pronouncement changes the general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued (see Note 12).

In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2009-05,Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value, which clarifies, among other things, that when a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, an entity must measure fair value using one or more specified techniques. The Company adopted the pronouncement effective July 2, 2009 with no impact on its financial statements.

In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13,Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, which revises the existing multiple-element revenue arrangements guidance and changes the determination of when the individual deliverables included in a multiple-element revenue arrangement may be treated as separate units of accounting, modifies the manner in which the transaction consideration is allocated across the separately identified deliverables and expands the disclosures required for multiple-element revenue arrangements. The pronouncement is effective for financial statements issued after December 31, 2010. The Company does not expect the pronouncement to have a material effect on its financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06,Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements, which requires additional disclosures about (1) the different classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value, (2) the valuation techniques and inputs used, (3) the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, and (4) the transfers between Levels 1, 2 and 3.The new disclosures are effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009. The Company does not expect the pronouncement to have a material effect on its financial statements.

The Company has considered all other recently issued accounting pronouncements and does not believe the adoption of such pronouncements will have a material impact on its financial statements.

2. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT(in millions)


	As of			As of
	December 31,			January 1,
	2009			2009
Equipment	$	60.6		$	53.3
Leasehold Improvements		1.6			1.4
Less accumulated depreciation		(39.3	)		(27.0	)

Subtotal		22.9			27.7
Construction in Progress		0.8			0.3

Total property and equipment	$	23.7		$	28.0

For the years ended December 31, 2009, January 1, 2009, 2007 post-IPO period and 2007 pre-IPO period we recorded depreciation of $12.5 million, $10.2 million, $4.8 million and $0.6 million respectively.

3. INTANGIBLE ASSETS

During 2008, NCM LLC issued 2,544,949 common membership units to its founding members in connection with its rights of exclusive access to net new theatres and projected attendees added by the founding members to NCM LLC’s network and 2,913,754 common membership units to Regal in connection with the closing of its acquisition of Consolidated Theatres (see Note 5). The Company recorded an intangible asset of $116.1 million representing the contractual rights. During the first quarter of 2009, NCM LLC issued 2,126,104 common membership units to its founding members in exchange for the rights to exclusive access to net new theatre screens and projected attendees added by the founding members to NCM LLC’s network. As a result, NCM LLC recorded an intangible asset at fair value of $28.5 million. The Company based the fair value of the intangible assets on the fair value of the common membership units issued on the date of grants, which are freely convertible into NCM Inc.’s common stock.

Pursuant to ASC Topic 350-10Intangibles — Goodwill and Other(formerly SFAS No. ~~157 establishes~~142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets), the intangible assets have a ~~framework~~finite useful life and the Company amortizes the assets over the remaining useful life corresponding with the ESAs. Amortization of the asset related to Regal Consolidated Theatres will not begin

F-59

NATIONAL CINEMEDIA LLC
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

until after 2011 since the Company will not have access to on-screen advertising in the Regal Consolidated Theatres until the run-out of their existing on—screen advertising agreement.


	As of December			As of January 1,
	31, 2009			2009
	(in millions)
Beginning balance	$	111.8		$	—
Purchase of intangible asset subject to amortization		28.5			116.1
Less integration payments		(3.2	)		(2.8	)
Less amortization expense		(2.9	)		(1.5	)

Total intangible assets	$	134.2		$	111.8

For the years ended December 31, 2009 and January 1, 2009 we recorded amortization of $2.9 million and $1.5 million, respectively.

The estimated aggregate amortization expense for ~~measuring fair value~~ each of the five succeeding years are as follows (in millions):


2010	$	3.0
2011		4.9
2012		4.9
2013		4.9
2014		4.9

4. ACCRUED EXPENSES(in ~~GAAP,~~millions)


	As of December 31,		As of January 1,
	2009		2009
Make-good Reserve	$	0.3	$	1.3
Accrued Interest		9.8		4.0
Other accrued expenses		2.3		1.0

Total accrued	$	12.4	$	6.3

5. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Years Ended December 31, 2009 and ~~expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157~~January 1, 2009 and the 2007 Post-IPO Period—

Pursuant to the ESAs, the Company makes monthly theatre access fee payments to the founding members, comprised of a payment per theatre attendee and a payment per digital screen with respect to the founding member theatres included in our network. Also, the founding members are purchasing 60 seconds of on-screen advertising time (with a right to purchase up to 90 seconds) for the year ended December 31, 2009 to satisfy their obligations under their beverage concessionaire agreements at a specified 30 second equivalent cost per thousand (“CPM”) impressions. For the year ended January 1, 2009 two of the founding members purchased 90 seconds and one purchased 60 seconds of on-screen advertising time under their beverage concessionaire agreement. For the 2007 post-IPO period, all three founding members purchased 90 seconds of on-screen time. The total theatre access fee to the founding members for the years ended December 31, 2009, January 1, 2009 and the 2007 post-IPO period is ~~effective~~$52.7 million, $49.8 million and $41.5 million, respectively. The total revenue related to the beverage concessionaire agreements for ~~fiscal~~the years ~~beginning after November 15, 2007. The~~ended December 31, 2009, January 1, 2009 and the 2007 post-IPO period is $36.3 million, $43.3 million and $40.9 million, respectively. In addition, the Company ~~expects~~makes payments to the founding members for use of their screens and theatres for its ~~investment~~Fathom Events businesses. These payments are at rates (percentage of event revenue) included in ~~IdeaCast, Inc. (see Note 5) to be measured for fair value~~the ESAs based on ~~unobservable inputs (level 3)~~the nature of the event. Payments to the founding members for these events totaled $6.7 million, $6.0 million and ~~expects~~$3.8 million for the ~~impact that SFAS No. 157 will have on its results of operations, financial condition~~years ended December 31, 2009, January 1, 2009 and ~~liquidity will not be significant.~~the 2007 post-IPO period, respectively.

~~F-50~~F-60

NATIONAL CINEMEDIA LLC
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~During February 2007,~~Also, pursuant to the ~~FASB issued SFAS No. 159,~~~~The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115~~. This statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value and report unrealized gains and losses on these investments in earnings. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company expects the impact that SFAS No. 159 will have on its results of operations, financial condition and liquidity will not be significant.

~~The Company has considered all other recently issued accounting pronouncements and do not believe the adoption of such pronouncements will have a material impact on the financial statements.~~

~~2. RECEIVABLES~~

~~Receivables consisted~~terms of the ~~following,~~LLC Operating Agreement in ~~millions:~~

As of December As of December
27, 2007 28, 2006

Trade accounts $ 92.2 $ 64.8
Other 0.9 0.2
Less allowance for doubtful accounts (1.5 ) (1.1 )

Total $ 91.6 $ 63.9

Atplace since the close of NCM, Inc.’s IPO, NCM LLC is required to make mandatory distributions on a proportionate basis to its members of available cash, as defined in the LLC Operating Agreement, on a quarterly basis in arrears. Balances for the years ended December ~~27, 2007, there is one individual account representing approximately 15% of the outstanding gross receivable balance.~~

~~The changes in NCM’s allowance for doubtful accounts are as follows, in millions:~~

Period Period
February 13, December 29, Period March
2007 through 2006 through Year Ended 29, 2005 through
December 27, February 12, December 28, December 29,
2007 2007 2006 2005

ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS:
Balance at beginning of period $ 1.1 $ 1.1 $ 0.5 $ —
Provision for bad debt 1.0 0.1 0.8 0.5
Write-offs, net (0.6 ) (0.1 ) (0.2 ) —

Balance at end of period $ 1.5 $ 1.1 $ 1.1 $ 0.5

~~3. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT~~~~(in millions)~~

As of December As of December
27, 2007 28, 2006
Equipment $ 37.3 $ 24.1
Leasehold Improvements 1.4 1.2
Less accumulated depreciation (17.3 ) (12.7 )

Subtotal 21.4 12.6
Construction in Progress 0.8 —

Total property and equipment $ 22.2 $ 12.6

~~For~~31, 2009, January 1, 2009 and the 2007 post-IPO period are as follows (in millions):


	2009		2008		Post-IPO

AMC	$	25.8	$	24.3	$	22.2
Cinemark		20.8		18.5		16.7
Regal		34.9		32.7		26.9
NCM, Inc.		57.8		55.6		53.3

Total	$	139.3	$	131.1	$	119.1

On January 26, 2006, AMC acquired the Loews Cineplex Entertainment Inc. (“AMC Loews”) theatre circuit. The Loews screen integration agreement, effective as of January 5, 2007 ~~pre-IPO period, year~~and amended and restated as of February 13, 2007, between NCM LLC and AMC, committed AMC to cause substantially all of the theatres it acquired as part of the Loews theatre circuit to be included in the NCM digital network in accordance with the ESAs on June 1, 2008. In accordance with the Loews screen integration agreement, prior to June 1, 2008 AMC paid the Company amounts based on an agreed-upon calculation to reflect cash amounts that approximated what NCM LLC would have generated if the Company sold on-screen advertising in the Loews theatre chain on an exclusive basis. These AMC Loews payments were made on a quarterly basis in arrears through May 31, 2008, with the exception of Star Theatres, which were paid through February 2009 in accordance with certain run-out provisions. For the years ended December ~~28, 2006~~31, 2009, January 1, 2009 and the 2007 post-IPO period, the AMC Loews payment was $0.1 million, $4.7 million and $11.2 million respectively. The AMC Loews payment was recorded directly to NCM LLC’s members’ equity account.

On April 30, 2008, Regal acquired Consolidated Theatres and NCM issued common membership units to Regal upon the closing of its acquisition in exchange for the right to exclusive access to the theatres (see Note 3). The Consolidated Theatres had a pre-existing advertising agreement and, as a result, Regal must make “integration” payments pursuant to the ESAs on a quarterly basis in arrears through 2011 in accordance with certain run-out provisions. For the years ended December ~~29, 2005~~31, 2009 and January 1, 2009, the ~~Company recorded depreciation of $4.8 million, $0.6 million, $4.0~~Consolidated Theatres payment was $3.2 million and ~~$1.8~~$2.8 million, ~~respectively.~~respectively and represents a cash element of the consideration received for the common membership units issued.

Amounts due to/from founding members at December 31, 2009 were comprised of the following (in millions):


	AMC			Cinemark			Regal			Total

Theatre access fees, net of beverage revenues	$	0.5		$	0.4		$	0.5		$	1.4
Cost and other reimbursement		(0.5	)		(0.5	)		(0.5	)		(1.5	)
Distributions payable, net		9.9			7.9			12.1			29.9

Total	$	9.9		$	7.8		$	12.1		$	29.8

Amounts due to/from founding members at January 1, 2009 were comprised of the following (in millions):


	AMC			Cinemark			Regal			Total

Theatre access fees, net of beverage revenues	$	(0.1	)	$	—		$	0.7		$	0.6
Cost and other reimbursement		(1.1	)		(0.5	)		(0.6	)		(2.2	)
Distributions payable, net		8.9			7.0			11.3			27.2

Total	$	7.7		$	6.5		$	11.4		$	25.6

~~F-51~~F-61

NATIONAL CINEMEDIA LLC
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~4. ACCRUED EXPENSES~~~~(in millions)~~

As of December As of December
27, 2007 28, 2006
Makegood Reserve $ 4.0 $ 2.6
Accrued Interest 2.3 0.1
Accrued beverage concessionaire unit cost 2.4 1.1
Other accrued expenses 1.3 1.7

Total accrued expenses $ 10.0 $ 5.5

~~5. INVESTMENT IN AFFILIATE~~

On June 26, 2007, NCM LLC invested $5.0 million of cash in 6% convertible preferred stock of IdeaCast, Inc., a provider of advertising to fitness centers and health clubs throughout the United States. On September 27, 2007, NCM LLC invested an additional $2.0 million of cash in 6% convertible preferred stock of IdeaCast, Inc. The amount of IdeaCast, Inc. 6% convertible preferred stock owned by NCM LLC at December 27, 2007 is convertible into a minority interest of IdeaCast, Inc.’s common stock. The preferred stock is accounted for as an investment in debt securities per SFAS No. 115,~~Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,~~ due to the provisions in the agreement, which gave the Company a mandatory redemption right five years after the date of investment. The securities are not held for trading purposes and are therefore by default and definition, classified as available-for-sale even though it is not the Company’s intent to sell these securities. There are no marketplace indicators of value that management can use to determine the fair value of the investment in IdeaCast. Management concluded that the estimated fair value of the securities at December 27, 2007 had not changed from their cost based on quantitative analysis which considered IdeaCast’s potential future operating results under a variety of conditions and consideration of various qualitative factors. Management’s assessment considered that there have been no significant changes in the prospects of IdeaCast’s business since the original investment and the decision to make a follow-on investment. As a result, there were no gains or losses recorded in other comprehensive income for the investment in IdeaCast, Inc. for the 2007 post-IPO period.

~~During September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,~~~~Fair Value Measurements~~. SFAS No. 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for us as of fiscal 2008. The Company expects the investment in IdeaCast, Inc. to be measured for fair value based on unobservable inputs (level 3) and expects the impact that SFAS No. 157 will have on its results of operations, financial condition and liquidity will not be significant.

A further agreement was entered into whereby, at the option of NCM LLC during the period June 30, 2008 through December 2009, a further investment may be made by NCM LLC to purchase common stock of IdeaCast, Inc. at a predetermined valuation formula, to bring NCM LLC’s total investment to approximately 50.1% of the capital stock of IdeaCast, Inc. (on a fully diluted basis assuming conversion of all of the 6% convertible preferred stock). The option to purchase common stock of IdeaCast, Inc. has not yet been exercised. The companies also entered into a shared services agreement which allows for cross-marketing and certain services to be provided between the companies at rates which will be determined on an arms length basis. The services provided by IdeaCast for the 2007 post-IPO period were not material to NCM.

~~F-52~~

~~NATIONAL CINEMEDIA, LLC~~
~~NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~to the founding members of NCM LLC for post-IPO period is $65.8 million, of which $20.5 million is included in the due to/from founding members at December 27, 2007.~~

On January 26, 2006, AMC acquired the Loews theatre circuit. The Loews screen integration agreement, effective as of January 5, 2007 and amended and restated as of February 13, 2007, between NCM LLC and AMC, commits AMC to cause the theatres it acquired from Loews to participate in the exhibitor services agreements beginning on June 1, 2008. In accordance with the Loews screen integration agreement, AMC pays us amounts based on an agreed-upon calculation to reflect amounts that approximate what NCM LLC would have generated if NCM LLC were able to sell on-screen advertising in the Loews theatre chain on an exclusive basis. These Loews payments are made on a quarterly basis in arrears through May 31, 2008 in accordance with certain run-out provisions. For the 2007 post-IPO period the Loews payment is $11.2 million, of which $3.7 million is included in the due to/from founding members at December 27, 2007. The Loews payment is recorded directly to NCM LLC’s members’ equity account.

~~Amounts due to/from founding members at December 27, 2007 were comprised of the following (in millions):~~

AMC Cinemark Regal Total

Theatre access fees, net of beverage revenues $ (0.2 ) $ 0.1 $ 0.2 $ 0.1
Cost and other reimbursement (0.4 ) (0.2 ) (0.5 ) (1.1 )
Distributions payable, net 3.2 5.2 8.4 16.8

Total $ 2.6 $ 5.1 $ 8.1 $ 15.8

~~Founding Members’ Other –~~

~~During the 2007 post-IPO period,~~ the 2007 pre-IPO period, ~~the year ended December 28, 2006 and the period ended December 29, 2005,~~ AMC, Cinemark and Regal purchased $1.9 million, $2.3 million, $1.4 million ~~$0.1 million, $2.1 million~~ and ~~$1.1~~$0.1 million respectively, of NCM LLC’s advertising inventory for their own use. The value of such purchases are calculated by reference to NCM LLC’s advertising rate card and is included in advertising ~~revenue with a percentage of such amounts returned by NCM LLC to~~revenue.

Included in Fathom Events operating costs is $1.0 million, $1.8 million, $3.3 million and $0.2 million for the ~~founding members as advertising circuit share during~~years ended December 31, 2009, January 1, 2009, the 2007 post-IPO period and the 2007 pre-IPO period ~~and the year ended December 28, 2006.~~

Included in media and events operating costs is $3.3. million, $0.2 million, $4.1 million and $2.1 million for the 2007 post-IPO period, the 2007 pre-IPO period, the year December 28, 2006 and the period ended December 29, 2005, respectively, related to purchases of movie tickets and concession products from the founding members primarily for marketing resale to NCM LLC’s customers.

Included in advertising operating costs is $0.2 million, $0.0 million, $0.0 million and $0.0 million for the 2007 post-IPO period, the 2007 pre-IPO period, the year ended December 28, 2006 and the period ended December 29, 2005, respectively, related to payments to founding members for costs associated with lobby promotions and concession items.

~~RCI Unit Option Plan –~~

In connection with the formation of NCM, LLC in 2005, Regal Cinemas, Inc. adopted and approved the RCI Severance Plan for Equity Compensation. Participation in the Severance Plan is limited to employees of RCM, who held unvested shares of Regal’s restricted common stock pursuant to the terms of the incentive plan immediately prior to such employees’ termination of employment with RCM and commenced employment with NCM, LLC. Under the terms of and subject to the conditions of the Severance Plan, each eligible employee who participates in the Severance Plan is, at the times set forth in the Severance Plan, entitled to a cash payments and payments in lieu of dividends as defined in the Severance Plan until the date that each such participant’s restricted stock would have vested in accordance with the incentive plan. As this severance plan provides for payments over future periods that are contingent upon continued employment with the Company, the cost of the severance plan is being recorded as an expense over the remaining required service periods. As the payments under the plan are being funded by Regal, Regal is credited with a capital contribution at NCM LLC equal to this severance plan expense. During the 2007 post-IPO period, the 2007 pre-IPO period, the year ended December 28, 2006 and the period ended December 29, 2005, severance expense and the related capital contribution recognized for amounts under the Regal option plan were $1.5 million, $0.4 million, $4.2 million and $8.5 million, respectively. The Company records the expense as a separate line item in the statements of operations. The amount recorded is not allocated to advertising operating costs, network costs, selling and marketing costs and

~~F-54~~

~~NATIONAL CINEMEDIA, LLC~~
~~NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~administrative costs because the recorded expense is associated with the past performance of Regal’s common stock market value rather than current period performance.~~

~~National CineMedia, Inc. –~~
National CineMedia, Inc. —

Pursuant to the LLC Operating Agreement, as the sole manager of NCM LLC, NCM, Inc. provides certain specific management services to NCM LLC, including those services of the positions of president and chief executive officer, president of sales and chief marketing officer, executive vice president and chief financial officer, executive vice president and chief ~~technology and~~ operations officer and executive vice president and general counsel. In exchange for the services, NCM LLC reimburses NCM, Inc. for compensation and other expenses of the officers and for certain out-of-pocket costs. During the years ended December 31, 2009 and January 1, 2009 and the 2007 post-IPO period, NCM LLC paid NCM, Inc. $10.8 million, $9.7 million and $9.2 million, respectively, for these services and expenses. The payments for estimated management services related to employment are made one month in advance. At December ~~27, 2007,~~31, 2009 and January 1, 2009, $0.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively, has been paid in advance and is reflected as prepaid management fees to managing member in the accompanying financial statements. NCM LLC also provides administrative and support services to NCM, Inc. such as office facilities, equipment, supplies, payroll and accounting and financial reporting at no charge. Based on the limited activities of NCM, Inc. as a standalone entity, the Company does not believe such unreimbursed costs are significant. The management services agreement also provides that NCM LLC employees may participate in the NCM, Inc. equity incentive plan (see Note 8)7).

Also, pursuant to the terms of the NCM LLC Operating Agreement in place since the close of the NCM, Inc. IPO, the Company is required to made mandatory distributions to the members of available cash, as defined in the NCM LLC Operating Agreement, on a quarterly basis. The available cash distribution to NCM, Inc. for the 2007 post-IPO period is $53.3 million, of which $16.6 million is included in the due to/from managing member at December 27, 2007.

Amounts due to/from managing member ~~at December 27, 2007~~ were comprised of the following (in millions):


			At December 31, 2009		At January 1, 2009
	Total
Distributions payable	$	16.6	$	22.0	$	21.0
Cost and other reimbursement		0.1		0.9		1.1

Total	$	16.7	$	22.9	$	22.1

NATIONAL CINEMEDIA LLC
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

7.6. BORROWINGS

~~Short-Term Borrowings From Members~~—In 2005, NCM signed an Amended and Restated Demand Promissory Note (the “Demand Note”) with its founding members under which the Company could borrow up to $11.0 million on a revolving basis. Borrowings under the Demand Note were funded by the founding members pro rata to their ownership of units. Interest was payable monthly at 200 basis points over LIBOR. Interest paid to the founding members during the period ended December 29, 2005 and the year ended December 28, 2006 was less than $0.1 million, in each period. The demand note was repaid and cancelled on March 22, 2006.

~~Long-Term Borrowings~~—

~~Revolving Credit Agreement~~—On March 22, 2006, NCM LLC entered into a bank-funded $20.0 million Revolving Credit Agreement, of which $2.0 million could have been utilized in support of letters of credit. The revolving credit agreement was collateralized by trade receivables, and borrowings under the revolving credit agreement were limited to 85% of eligible trade receivables, as defined. The revolving credit agreement bore interest, at NCM LLC’s option, at either an adjusted Eurodollar rate or the base rate plus, in each case, an applicable margin. Outstanding borrowings at December 28, 2006, were $10.0 million. The revolving credit agreement was repaid and cancelled on February 13, 2007.

~~Senior Secured Credit Facility~~—On February 13, 2007, concurrently with the closing of the IPO of NCM, Inc., NCM LLC entered into a senior secured credit facility with a group of lenders. The facility consists of a six-year $80.0 million revolving credit facility and an eight-year, $725.0 million term loan facility. The ~~term loan is due on the eighth anniversary of the funding. The~~ revolving credit facility portion is available, subject to certain conditions, for general corporate purposes of the Company in the ordinary course of business and for other transactions permitted under the credit agreement, and a portion is available for letters of credit.

The outstanding balance of the term loan facility at December ~~27, 2007~~31, 2009 and January 1, 2009 was $725.0 million. The outstanding balance under the revolving credit facility at December ~~27,~~

~~F-55~~

~~NATIONAL CINEMEDIA, LLC~~
~~NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~2007~~31, 2009 and January 1, 2009 was ~~$59.0~~$74.0 million. The obligations under the credit facility are secured by a lien on substantially all of the assets of NCM LLC. Borrowings under the senior secured credit facility bear interest, at the option of the Company, at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus either a variable base rate or a eurodollar rate. The applicable margin for both the term loan facility and the revolving credit facility is 0.75% with respect to base rate loans and 1.75% with respect to eurodollar loans. As of December ~~27, 2007,~~31, 2009, the effective rate on the term loan was ~~6.77% (the~~5.59% including the effect of the interest rate ~~swap~~swaps (both those accounted for as hedges and those not). The interest rate swaps hedged $550.0 million of the $725.0 million term loan at a fixed interest rate of 6.734% while the unhedged portion was at an interest rate of ~~6.87%) and the~~2.01%. The weighted-average interest rate on the unhedged revolver was ~~6.81%~~1.99%. Commencing with the ~~third~~fourth fiscal quarter in fiscal year 2008, the applicable margin for the revolving credit facility ~~will be~~is determined quarterly and ~~will be~~is subject to adjustment based upon a consolidated net senior secured leverage ratio for NCM LLC and its subsidiaries ~~(defined in the NCM LLC credit agreement as the~~(the ratio of secured funded debt less unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, over ~~adjusted EBITDA, as defined). Upon~~a non-GAAP measure defined in the ~~occurrence of any payment default, certain amounts under the senior secured~~ credit ~~facility will bear interest at a rate equal~~agreement which is equivalent to ~~the rate then in effect with respect to such borrowings, plus 2.00% per annum.~~Adjusted OIBDA). The senior secured credit facility also contains a number of covenants and financial ratio requirements, with which ~~at December 27, 2007,~~ the Company was in ~~compliance. Upon occurrence~~compliance at December 31, 2009, including the consolidated net senior secured leverage ratio. There are no distribution restrictions as long as the Company is in compliance with its debt covenants. As of December 31, 2009, our consolidated net senior secured leverage ratio was 4.0 times the covenant. The debt covenants also require 50% of the term loan, or $362.5 million to be hedged at a fixed rate. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had approximately $550 million or 76% hedged. Of the $550.0 million that is hedged, $137.5 million is with Lehman Brothers Special Financing (“LBSF”). As described further in Note 12, in February 2010 LBSF transferred its interest rate swap agreement to Barclays Bank PLC (“Barclays”). See Note 10 for an ~~event~~additional discussion of ~~default, among other remedies available~~the interest rate swaps.

On September 15, 2008, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (“Lehman”) filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the federal Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. NCM LLC has an aggregate revolving credit facility commitment of $80.0 million with a consortium of banks, including $20.0 million with Lehman Commercial Paper Inc. (“LCPI”), a subsidiary of Lehman. As of December 31, 2009, NCM LLC borrowed $14.0 million from LCPI under the revolving credit facility. Following the bankruptcy filing, LCPI failed to fund a borrowing request related to its undrawn commitment of $6.0 million. On February 3, 2010, LCPI assigned the $6.0 million commitment to Barclays. Until the LCPI issues are resolved, NCM LLC is not anticipating repaying any of its revolver borrowings as it would effectively result in a permanent reduction of its revolving credit facility, to the extent of any payments of LCPI commitments. In addition, NCM LLC has been working with LCPI and its other lenders with the goal of having LCPI’s agency function transferred to another bank within NCM LLC’s lender group and restructuring LCPI’s outstanding $14.0 million revolving loan such that (i) it would not be required to be repaid, nor would it share in any pro rata prepayments of the revolving loans, until the final maturity date of the revolving credit facility, and (ii) it would not be available for reborrowing in the event that it was prepaid. Until these LCPI issues are resolved, however, NCM LLC is not anticipating repaying any of its revolver borrowings as it would effectively result in a permanent reduction of its revolving credit facility, to the extent of the payments against LCPI borrowings.

On March 19, 2009, the Company gave an $8.5 million note payable to Credit Suisse, Cayman Islands Branch (“Credit Suisse”) with no stated interest to settle the $10.0 million contingent put obligation and to acquire the $20.7 million outstanding principal balance of debt of IdeaCast, Inc. (“IdeaCast”) (together with all ~~outstanding loans may~~accrued interest and other lender costs required to be ~~accelerated and/or~~reimbursed by IdeaCast). Quarterly payments to Credit Suisse began on April 15, 2009 and will continue through January 15, 2011. At issuance the ~~lenders’ commitments may be terminated.~~Company recorded the note at a present value of $7.0 million. At December 31, 2009, $4.3 million of the balance is recorded in current liabilities and $0.3 million is included in non-current liabilities. Interest on the note is accreted at the Company’s estimated incremental cost of debt based on then current market indicators over the term of the loan to interest expense. The amount of interest expense recognized on the note for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $0.7 million. See Note 9 “—Contingent Put Obligation” for additional discussion of the IdeaCast restructuring.

F-63

NATIONAL CINEMEDIA LLC
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Future Maturities of Long-Term Borrowings—

~~There are no~~The scheduled annual maturities on the credit facility for the next five years ~~and~~ as of December ~~27, 2007; the next scheduled annual maturity on the outstanding credit facility of $784.0 million is after fiscal year 2012.~~31, 2009 are as follows (in millions):

2010 $ 4.3
2011 —
2012 —
2013 74.0
2014 —
Thereafter 725.0

Total $ 803.3

8.7. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

On April 4, 2006, NCM LLC’s board of directors approved the NCM LLC 2006 Unit Option Plan, under which 1,131,728 units were outstanding as of December 28, 2006. Under certain circumstances, holders of unit options could put the options to NCM LLC for cash. As such, the Unit Option Plan was accounted for as a liability plan and the liability was measured at its fair value at each reporting date. The valuation of the liability was determined based on provisions of ASC Topic 718Compensation — Stock Compensation(formerly SFAS No. 123(R)), and factored into the valuation that the options were granted in contemplation of anNCM, Inc.’s IPO. The Company used the estimated pricing of ~~the~~NCM, Inc.’s IPO at the time of the grant to determine the equity value, for each unit underlying the options. The Unit Option Plan allowed for additional equity awards to be issued to outstanding option holders in the event of the occurrence of anNCM, Inc.’s IPO, with the purpose of the additional option awards or restricted units being to ensure that the economic value of outstanding unit options, as defined in the agreement, held just prior to anNCM, Inc.’s IPO was maintained by the option holder immediately after the offering.

At the date of the NCM, Inc.’s IPO, ~~NCM, Inc.~~the Company adopted the NCM, Inc. 2007 Equity Incentive Plan. The employees of NCM, Inc. and ~~the employees of~~ NCM LLC are eligible ~~for participation~~to participate in ~~the Equity Incentive Plan. There are 2,576,000 shares of common stock available for issuance or delivery under~~ the Equity Incentive Plan. Under the Equity Incentive Plan, ~~NCM, Inc.~~eligible employees were issued stock options on 1,589,625 shares of common stock to holders of outstanding unit options in substitution of the unit options and also issued 262,466 shares of restricted stock. In connection with the conversion at the date of ~~the~~ NCM, Inc.’s IPO, and pursuant to the antidilution adjustment terms of the Unit Option Plan, the exercise price and the number of shares of common stock subject to options held by the Company’s option holders were adjusted to prevent dilution and restore their economic position to that existing immediately before the NCM, Inc. IPO. The Equity Incentive Plan is treated as an equity plan under the provisions of ~~SFAS No. 123(R),~~Topic 718, and the existing liability under the Unit Option Plan at the end of the 2007 pre-IPO period of $2.3 million was reclassified to ~~members’~~ equity ~~of NCM LLC~~ at that date.

~~F-56~~

~~NATIONAL CINEMEDIA, LLC~~
~~NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~Activity in~~As of December 31, 2009, there were 7,076,000 shares of common stock available for issuance or delivery under the Equity Incentive ~~Plan, as converted, is as follows:~~

Weighted-
Weighted- Average Aggregate
Average Remaining Intrinsic Value
Shares Exercise Price Life (in years) (in Millions)

Outstanding at December 28, 2006 1,131,728 $ 23.85
Granted 274,500 22.33
Exercised — —
Anti-dilution adjustments made to outstanding options in connection with the plan conversion 457,897 16.98
Forfeited (41,219 ) 18.72

Outstanding at December 27, 2007 1,822,906 $ 17.75 12.7 $ 12.1
Vested at December 27, 2007 — — — —

Exercisable at December 27, 2007 — $ — — $ —

NCM, Inc. has estimated the fair value of these options to range from $5.46 to $8.17 per share based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes model requires that NCM, Inc. make estimates of various factors used, as noted below. The fair value of the options is being charged to operations over the vesting period.

Plan. Options awarded under the Equity Incentive Plan are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of NCM, Inc. common stock on the date of the grant. The options vest annually over periods between 59 through 81 months and have either 10-year or 15-year contractual terms. The following table summarizes information about the stock options at December 27, 2007, including the weighted average remaining contractual life and weighted average exercise price:

Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
Weighted Weighted Weighted
Number Average Average Number Average
Outstanding at Remaining Life Exercise Exercisable at Exercise
Range of Exercise Price Dec. 27, 2007 (in years) Price Dec. 27, 2007 Price
$16.35–$18.01 1,473,041 13.3 $ 16.52 — $ —
$21.00 197,000 9.1 21.00 — —
$24.04–$24.74 114,865 13.0 24.25 — —
$26.76-$29.05 38,000 14.1 28.87 — —

1,822,906 12.7 $ 17.75 — $ —

~~The following assumptions were used in the valuation~~Upon vesting of the ~~options:~~

	•		~~Expected life~~awards, NCM LLC will issue common membership units to NCM, Inc. equal to the number of shares of options—6.5 to 9 years. The expected life of the options was determined by using the average of the vesting and contractual terms of the options (the “simplified method” as described in Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin 110).

	•		~~Risk free interest rate—4.1% to 4.9%. The risk-free interest rate was determined by using the applicable Treasury rates as of the grant dates, commensurate with the expected terms of the options.~~

	•		~~Expected volatility—30.0%. Expected volatility was estimated based on comparable companies for historic stock price volatility.~~

~~F-57~~

~~NATIONAL CINEMEDIA, LLC~~
~~NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~Dividend yield—3.0%. The estimated dividend yield was determined using~~ NCM, Inc.’s ~~expectations based on estimated cash flow characteristics and expected long-term dividend policy after the NCM, Inc. IPO.~~

common stock represented by such awards. Under the fair value recognition provisions of ~~SFAS No. 123R,~~Topic 718, the Company recognizes stock-based compensation ~~is recognized~~ net of an estimated forfeiture rate, and therefore only recognizes stock-based compensation cost for those shares expected to vest over the requisite service period of the ~~award is recognized.~~award. Options generally vest annually over a three or five-year period and have either 10-year or 15-year contractual terms. A forfeiture rate of 5% was estimated for all employees to reflect the potential separation of employees. ~~NCM, Inc. expects approximately 1,732,000 of the outstanding options to vest.~~

The Company recognized $1.9 million, $0.3 million and $1.9 million for the 2007 post-IPO period, the 2007 pre-IPO period and the year ended December 28, 2006, respectively, of share-based compensation expense for these options and no amounts were capitalized. The recognized expense, including ~~the~~ equity based compensation costs of NCM, Inc. employees, is included in the operating results of NCM LLC. The Company recognized $3.1 million, $2.1 million, $1.9 million, and $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, January 1, 2009, the 2007 post-IPO period, and the 2007 pre-IPO period, respectively, of share-based compensation expense for these options and $0.1 million and $0.1 million were capitalized during the year ended December 31, 2009 and January 1, 2009, respectively. As of December ~~27, 2007,~~31, 2009, unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested options was approximately ~~$8.9~~$7.1 million, which will be recognized over a weighted average remaining period of ~~between 48~~2.33 years.

F-64

NATIONAL CINEMEDIA LLC
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The weighted average grant date fair value of granted options was $2.17, $3.77 and ~~60 months.~~$6.23 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and January 1, 2009 and the 2007 post-IPO period, respectively. The intrinsic value of options exercised during the year was $0.2 million for both years ended December 31, 2009 and January 1, 2009. During the year ended December 31, 2009 there was an immaterial amount of cash received on options exercised and $0.6 million received for the 2008 period. The total fair value of awards vested during the years ended December 31, 2009 and January 1, 2009 was $0.3 million and $3.9 million, respectively. There were no options vested or exercised prior to the 2008 fiscal year.

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which requires that the Company make estimates of various factors. The following assumptions were used in the valuation of the options:

Fiscal 2009 Fiscal 2008 Fiscal 2007

Expected life of options 6.5 years 6.5 years 6.5 to 9 years

Risk free interest rate 2.23% to 3.70% 3.74% to 4.09% 4.1% to 4.9%

Expected volatility 30 % 30 % 30 %

Dividend yield 3 % 3 % 3 %

Activity in the Equity Incentive Plan, as converted, is as follows:

Weighted Average
Remaining
Weighted Average Contractual Life Aggregate Intrinsic
Shares Exercise Price (in years) Value (in millions)

Outstanding at January 1, 2009 2,025,099 $ 17.33
Granted 1,156,515 9.53
Exercised (1,800 ) 5.35
Forfeited (53,254 ) 14.35

Outstanding at December 31, 2009 3,126,560 $ 14.51 9.9 $ 9.2

Exercisable at December 31, 2009 648,359 $ 17.67 10.5 $ 0.2
Vested and Expected to Vest at December 31, 2009 3,090,782 $ 14.52 9.9 $ 9.0

The following table summarizes information about the stock options at December 31, 2009, including the weighted average remaining contractual life and weighted average exercise price:

Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
Weighted Weighted Weighted
Number Average Average Number Average
Outstanding at Remaining Life (in Exercise Exercisable at Exercise
Range of Exercise Price Dec. 31, 2009 years) Price Dec. 31, 2009 Price
$ 5.35—$ 9.22 1,126,350 9.0 $ 9.06 7,800 $ 5.35
$11.59—$15.04 136,408 8.9 13.47 14,600 12.33
$16.35—$18.01 1,409,436 11.3 16.52 476,280 16.56
$19.37—$21.00 301,500 �� 7.5 20.35 96,000 20.59
$24.04—$29.05 152,866 10.1 25.40 53,679 25.59

3,126,560 9.9 $ 14.51 648,359 $ 17.67

F-65

NATIONAL CINEMEDIA LLC
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Non-vested (Restricted) Stock– —NCM, Inc. ~~implemented~~has a ~~restricted~~non-vested stock program as part of the Equity Incentive Plan. The plan provides for ~~restricted~~non-vested stock awards to officers, board members and other key employees, including employees of NCM LLC. Under the ~~restricted~~non-vested stock program, common stock of NCM, Inc. may be granted at no cost to officers, board members and key employees, subject to a continued employment restriction and as such restrictions lapse, ~~(generally at the start of each subsequent calendar year),~~ the award vests in that proportion. The participants are entitled to cash dividends from NCM, Inc. and to vote their respective shares, ~~at NCM, Inc.,~~ although the sale and transfer of such shares is prohibited and the shares are subject to forfeiture during the restricted period. The shares are also subject to the terms and provisions of the Equity Incentive Plan. ~~The restricted~~Non-vested stock ~~vests~~awards granted in ~~equal annual installments over a five-year period, except awards~~2009 include performance vesting conditions, which permit vesting to the extent that NCM, Inc. achieves specified non-GAAP targets at the end of the three-year period. Non-vested stock granted to non-employee directors ~~which~~ vest after one year. Compensation cost is valued based on the market price on the grant date and is expensed over the vesting period.

~~The following table represents the shares of non-vested stock of NCM, Inc. that were granted during the period and outstanding as of December 27, 2007:~~
The following table represents the shares of non-vested stock:


				Weighted					Weighted Average
	Period February 13, 2007			Average Grant-		Shares			Grant-Date Fair Value
	through December 27, 2007			Date Fair Value
Non-vested as of January 1, 2009							203,618		$	20.91
Granted							424,555			9.50
Forfeited							(12,500	)		10.10
Vested							(25,299	)		21.93

Non-vested at December 28, 2006		—

Granted		275,184		$	21.21

Forfeited		(3,339	)		21.00

Non-vested as of December 27, 2007		271,845		$	21.21
Non-vested as of December 31, 2009							590,374		$	13.15

On March 19, 2009, NCM LLC, IdeaCast and IdeaCast’s lender agreed to certain transactions with respect to the IdeaCast Credit Agreement. Among other things, these agreements resulted in (i) the termination of the Put and the Call; (ii) the transfer, sale and assignment by IdeaCast’s lender to NCM LLC of all of its right, title and interest under the Credit Agreement, including without limitation the loans outstanding under the Credit Agreement; (iii) the resignation of IdeaCast’s lender, and the appointment of NCM LLC, as administrative agent and collateral agent under the Credit Agreement; and (iv) the delivery by NCM LLC to IdeaCast’s lender of a non-interest bearing promissory note in the amount of $8.5 million payable through January 2011. On June 16, 2009, NCM LLC’s interest in the Credit Agreement was assigned to NCM Out-Of-Home, LLC (“OOH”), which was a wholly-owned subsidiary of NCM LLC. OOH was also appointed as administrative agent and collateral agent under the Credit Agreement. On June 16, 2009, OOH, as IdeaCast’s senior secured lender, foreclosed on substantially all of the assets of IdeaCast, consisting of certain tangible and intangible assets (primarily equipment, business processes and contracts with health clubs and programming partners). The assets were valued at approximately $8.2 million. On June 29, 2009, NCM LLC transferred its ownership interest in OOH to RMG, a digital advertising company, in exchange for approximately 24% of the equity (excluding out-of-the-money warrants) of RMG on a fully diluted basis through a combination of convertible preferred stock, common stock and common stock warrants (refer to Note 1-Equity Method Investments). The Company’s investment in RMG was valued at the fair value of the assets contributed.

NATIONAL CINEMEDIA LLC
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

10. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AND DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

Fair Value Measurements—The fair values of the Company’s assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis pursuant to ASC Topic 820-10Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures(formerly FAS No. 157,Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures) are as follows (in millions):

Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
Quoted Prices in Significant
At Active Markets Other Significant
December 31, for Identical Observable Unobservable
2009 Assets (Level 1) Inputs (Level 2) Inputs (Level 3)

LIABILITIES:

Interest Rate Swap Agreements $ 54.6 — $ 54.6 —

Derivative Instruments—NCM LLC has interest rate swap agreements with four counterparties that, at their inception, qualified for and were designated as cash flow hedges against interest rate exposure on $550.0 million of the variable rate debt obligations under the senior secured credit facility. The interest rate swap agreements have the effect of converting a portion of the Company’s variable rate debt to a fixed rate of 6.734%. All interest rate swaps were entered into for risk management purposes. The Company has no derivatives for other purposes.

On September 15, 2008, Lehman filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the Federal Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. LBSF is the counterparty to a notional amount of $137.5 million of NCM LLC’s interest rate swaps, and Lehman is a guarantor of LBSF’s obligations under such swap. NCM LLC notified LBSF on September 18, 2008 that, as a result of the bankruptcy of Lehman, an event of default had occurred under the swap with respect to which LBSF was the defaulting party. On October 3, 2008, LBSF also filed for Chapter 11 protection, which constituted another default by LBSF under the swap. As a result, as permitted under the terms of NCM LLC’s swap agreement with LBSF, the Company has withheld interest rate swap payments aggregating $5.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2009 and $1.5 million in the year ended January 1, 2009 that were due to LBSF, and has further notified LBSF that the bankruptcy and insolvency of both Lehman and LBSF constitute default events under the swap. As of December 31, 2009 the interest rate swap agreement had not been terminated.

The Company performed an effectiveness test for the swaps with LBSF as of September 14, 2008, the day immediately prior to the default date, and determined they were effective on that date. As a result, the fair values of the interest rate swap on that date was recorded as a liability with an offsetting amount recorded in other comprehensive income. Cash flow hedge accounting was discontinued on September 15, 2008 due to the event of default and the inability of the Company to continue to demonstrate the swap would be effective. The Company continues to record the interest rate swap with LBSF at fair value with any change in the fair value recorded in the statement of operations.

There was an $8.3 million decrease and a $13.8 million increase in the fair value of the liability for the years ended December 31, 2009 and January 1, 2009, respectively, which the Company recorded as a component of interest expense. In accordance with Topic 815Derivatives and Hedging, the net derivative loss as of September 14, 2008 related to the discontinued cash flow hedge with LBSF shall continue to be reported in accumulated other comprehensive income unless it is probable that the forecasted transaction will not occur by the end of the originally specified time period. Accordingly, the net derivative loss is being amortized to interest expense over the remaining term of the interest rate swap through February 13, 2015. The amount amortized during the years ended December 31, 2009 and January 1, 2009 were $1.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively. The Company estimates approximately $1.3 million will be amortized to interest expense in the next 12 months.

Both at inception and on an on-going basis the Company performs an effectiveness test using the hypothetical derivative method. The fair values of the interest rate swaps with the counterparties other than LBSF (representing notional amounts of $412.5 million associated with a like amount of the variable rate debt) are recorded on the Company’s balance sheet as a liability with the change in fair value recorded in other comprehensive income since the instruments other than LBSF were determined to be perfectly effective at December 31, 2009 and January 1, 2009. There were no amounts reclassified into current earnings due to ineffectiveness during the periods presented other than as described below.

The fair value of the Company’s interest rate swap is based on dealer quotes, and represents an estimate of the amount the Company would receive or pay to terminate the agreements taking into consideration various factors, including current interest rates and the forward yield curve for 3-month LIBOR.

F-68

NATIONAL CINEMEDIA LLC
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

At December 31, 2009 and January 1, 2009, the estimated fair value and line item caption of derivative instruments recorded were as follows (in millions):

Liability Derivatives
As of December 31, 2009 As of January 1, 2009
Balance Sheet Balance Sheet
Location Fair Value Location Fair Value
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest Rate Swaps Other Liabilities $ 40.9 Other Liabilities $ 65.8

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest Rate Swaps Other Liabilities $ 13.7 Other Liabilities $ 21.9

Total derivatives $ 54.6 $ 87.7

The effect of derivative instruments in cash flow hedge relationships on the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009, January 1, 2009, the 2007 post-IPO period were as follows (in millions):

Unrealized Gain (Loss) Realized Gain (Loss)
Recognized in NCM LLC’s Recognized in Interest
OCI (Pre-tax) Expense (Pre-tax)
Period Period
Feb.13, Feb.13,
Year Year 2007 Year Year 2007
Ended Ended through Ended Ended through
Dec. 31, Jan. 1, Dec. 27, Dec. 31, Jan. 1, Dec. 27,
2009 2009 2007 2009 2009 2007

Interest Rate Swaps $ 9.3 $ (67.9 ) $ (12.3 ) $ (16.7 ) $ (8.8 ) $ 2.1

There was $1.3 million and $0.4 million $0.0 million and $0.0 million of ineffectiveness recognized for the years ended December 31, 2009, January 1, 2009, the 2007 post-IPO period and the 2007 pre-IPO period, respectively.

The effect of derivative not designated as hedging instruments under Topic 815 on the financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2009, January 1, 2009, the 2007 post-IPO period and the 2007 pre-IPO period were as follows (in millions):

Gain or (Loss) Recognized
in Interest Expense (Pre-tax)
Year Year Period Feb.
Ended Ended 13, 2007 through
Dec. 31, Jan. 1, Dec. 27,
2009 2009 2007

Borrowings $ (6.2 ) $ (1.0 ) $ —
Change in derivative fair value 7.0 (14.2 ) —

Total $ 0.8 $ (15.2 ) $ —

11. SEGMENT REPORTING

Advertising is the principal business activity of the Company and is the Company’s reportable segment under the requirements of ASC Topic 280,Segment Reporting. Advertising revenue accounts for 88.0%, 89.4%, 91.7% and 87.7% of revenue for the years ended December 31, 2009, January 1, 2009, the post-IPO period and the pre-IPO period, respectively. Fathom Consumer Events and Fathom Business Events are operating segments under ASC Topic 280, but do not meet the quantitative thresholds for segment reporting. The following table presents revenues less directly identifiable expenses to arrive at operating income net of direct expenses for the Advertising reportable segment, the combined Fathom Events operating segments, and Network, Administrative and Unallocated costs. Management does not evaluate its segments on a fully allocated cost basis. Therefore, the measure of segment operating income net of direct expenses shown below is not prepared on the same basis as operating income in the statement of operations and the results below are not indicative of what segment results of operations would have been had it been operated on a fully allocated cost basis. Management

F-69

NATIONAL CINEMEDIA LLC
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

cautions that it would be inappropriate to assume that unallocated operating costs are incurred proportional to segment revenue or any directly identifiable segment expenses. Unallocated operating costs consist primarily of network costs, general and administrative costs and other unallocated costs including depreciation and amortization. Management does not track segment assets and, therefore, segment asset information is not presented.

Year Ended December 31, 2009 (in millions)
Network,
Administrative
and
Unallocated
Advertising Other Costs Total

Revenue $ 335.1 $ 45.5 $ 0.1 $ 380.7
Operating costs 72.7 29.1 101.8
Selling and marketing costs 40.6 8.6 1.0 50.2
Other costs 2.8 0.9 3.7

Operating income, net of direct expenses $ 219.0 $ 6.9
Network, administrative and other costs 56.8 56.8

Total Operating Income $ 168.2

Year Ended January 1, 2009 (in millions)
Network,
Administrative
and
Unallocated
Advertising Other Costs Total

Revenue $ 330.3 $ 38.9 $ 0.3 $ 369.5
Operating costs 68.5 25.1 93.6
Selling and marketing costs 38.5 8.3 1.1 47.9
Other costs 2.8 0.8 3.6

Operating income, net of direct expenses $ 220.5 $ 4.7
Network, administrative and other costs 51.2 51.2

Total Operating Income $ 173.2

Period February 13, 2007 through December 27, 2007
(in millions)
Network,
Administrative
and
Unallocated
Advertising Other Costs Total

Revenue $ 282.7 $ 25.4 $ 0.2 $ 308.3
Operating costs 50.6 15.4 66.0
Selling and marketing costs 32.2 7.4 1.3 40.9
Other costs 2.4 0.4 2.8

Operating income, net of direct expenses $ 197.5 $ 2.2
Network, administrative and other costs 37.1 37.1

Total Operating Income $ 161.5

F-70

NATIONAL CINEMEDIA LLC
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Period December 29, 2006 through February 12, 2007
(in millions)
Network,
Administrative
and
Unallocated
Advertising Other Costs Total

Revenue $ 20.7 $ 2.9 $ 23.6
Operating costs 15.5 1.4 16.9
Selling and marketing costs 4.4 0.8 5.2
Other costs 0.3 0.1 0.4

Operating income, net of direct expenses $ 0.5 $ 0.6
Network, administrative and other costs $ 5.2 5.2

Total Operating Income (Loss) ($4.1 )

The following is a summary of revenues by category, in millions:

Period Period
February 13, December 29,
Year Ended Year Ended 2007 through 2006 through
December January 1, December 27, February 12,
31, 2009 2009 2007 2007

National Advertising Revenue $ 236.8 $ 223.1 $ 187.1 $ 15.3
Founding Member Advertising Revenue 36.3 43.3 40.9 —
Regional Advertising Revenue 62.0 63.9 54.7 5.4
Fathom Consumer Revenue 28.6 20.2 8.2 1.4
Fathom Business Revenue 16.9 18.7 17.2 1.5
Other Revenue 0.1 0.3 0.2 —

Total Revenues $ 380.7 $ 369.5 $ 308.3 $ 23.6

12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

ASC Topic 855-10,Subsequent Events(formerly SFAS No. 165,Subsequent Events) requires the Company to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated, as well as whether that date is the date the financial statements were issued. For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company evaluated, for potential recognition and disclosure, events that occurred prior to the inclusion of the Company’s financial statements in NCM, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 on March 9, 2010.

Effective February 8, 2010, NCM LLC entered into a novation agreement with Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc. (“Lehman”) and Barclays Bank PLC (“Barclays”) whereby Lehman transferred to Barclays all the rights, liabilities, duties and obligations of NCM LLC’s interest rate swap agreement with Lehman with identical terms. NCM LLC accepted Barclays as its sole counterparty with respect to the new agreement. The term runs until February 13, 2015, subject to earlier termination upon the occurrence of certain specified events. Subject to the terms of the new agreement, NCM LLC or Barclays will make payments at specified intervals based on the variance between LIBOR and a fixed rate of 4.984% on a notional amount of $137,500,000. NCM LLC effectively pays a rate of 6.734% on this notional amount inclusive of the 1.75% margin currently required by NCM LLC’s credit agreement. The agreement with Barclays is secured by the assets of NCM LLC on a pari passu basis with the credit agreement (as defined in Note 6) and the other interest rates swaps that were entered into by NCM LLC. In consideration of Lehman entering into the transfer, NCM LLC agreed to pay to Lehman the full amount of interest rate swap payments withheld aggregating $7.0 million and an immaterial amount of default interest. The Company expects to redesignate the Barclays interest rate swap agreement as a cash flow hedge.

Effective February 3, 2010, LCPI entered into an assignment and assumption agreement with Barclays whereby LCPI transferred to Barclays the remaining unfunded revolving credit commitment of $6.0 million.

F-71

EXHIBIT INDEX


Number		Exhibit Title

~~2.1~~ 2.1(a)		Stock Contribution and Exchange Agreement, dated as of August 7, 2006, by and between Cinemark Holdings, Inc., Cinemark, Inc., Syufy Enterprises, LP and Century Theatres Holdings, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 000-47040, filed by Cinemark USA, Inc. on August 11, 2006).

2.1(b)		Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 7, 2006, by and among Cinemark USA, Inc, Cinemark Holdings, Inc., Syufy Enterprises LP, Century Theatres, Inc. and Century Theatres Holdings, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to current Report on Form 8-K, File No, 000-47040, filed by Cinemark USA, Inc. on August 11, 2006).

2.2		Contribution and Exchange Agreement, dated as of August 7, 2006, by and among Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and Lee Roy Mitchell, The Mitchell Special Trust, Alan W. Stock, Timothy Warner, Robert Copple, Michael Cavalier, Northwestern University, John Madigan, Quadrangle Select Partners LP, Quadrangle Capital Partners A LP, Madison Dearborn Capital Partners IV, L.P., K&E Investment Partners, LLC — 2004-B-DIF, Piola Investments Ltd., Quadrangle (Cinemark) Capital Partners LP and Quadrangle Capital Partners LP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 000-47040, filed by Cinemark USA, Inc. on August 11, 2006).

3.1		Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Cinemark Holdings, Inc. filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on April 9, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No. 2 to our Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed on April 9, 2007).

3.2(a)		Amended and Restated Bylaws of Cinemark Holdings, Inc. dated April 9, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Amendment No. 2 to our Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed on April 9, 2007).

3.2(b)		First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Bylaws of Cinemark Holdings, Inc. dated April 16, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2(b) to Amendment No. 4 to our Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed on April 19, 2007).

4.1		Specimen stock certificate of Cinemark Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 2 to our Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed on April 9, 2007).

4.2(a)		Indenture, dated as of March 31, 2004, between Cinemark, Inc. and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. governing the ~~93/4%~~9³/₄% senior discount notes issued thereunder (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2(a) to Cinemark, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-4, File No. 333-116292, filed June 8, 2004).

4.2(b)		Form of ~~93/4%~~9³/₄% senior discount notes (contained in the indenture listed as Exhibit 4.2(a) above) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2(b) to Cinemark, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-4, File No. 333-116292, filed June 8, 2004).

4.3(a)		Indenture, dated as of February 11, 2003, between Cinemark USA, Inc. and The Bank of New York Trust Company of Florida, N.A. governing the 9% senior subordinated notes issued thereunder (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2(b) to Cinemark USA, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, File 033-47040, filed March 19, 2003).

4.3(b)		First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 7, 2003, between Cinemark USA, Inc., the subsidiary guarantors party thereto and The Bank of New York Trust Company of Florida, N.A. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.2(i) to Cinemark USA, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-4/A, File No. 333-104940, filed May 28, 2003).

4.3(c)		Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of November 11, 2004, between Cinemark USA, Inc., the subsidiary guarantors party thereto and The Bank of New York Trust Company of Florida, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2(c) to Cinemark USA, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, File No. 033-047040, filed March 28, 2005).

4.3(d)		Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 5, 2006, among Cinemark USA, Inc., the subsidiaries of Cinemark USA, Inc. named therein, and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 000-47040, filed by Cinemark USA, Inc. on October 12, 2006).

4.3(e)		Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 20, 2007, among Cinemark USA, Inc., the subsidiaries of Cinemark USA, Inc. named therein, and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 033-47040, filed by Cinemark USA, Inc. on March 26, 2007).

4.3(f)		Form of 9% Senior Subordinated Note, Due 2013 (contained in the Indenture listed as Exhibit 4.3(a) above) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2(b) to Cinemark USA, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K , File 033-47040, filed March 19, 2003).

~~4.4~~		Stockholders Agreement, dated as of August 7, 2006, effective October 5, 2006, by and among Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and the stockholders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed February 1, 2007).

4.5		Registration Agreement, dated as of August 7, 2006, effective October 5, 2006, by and among Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and the stockholders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Cinemark Holdings Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed February 1, 2007).

4.6		Director Nomination Agreement by and among Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and certain stockholders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8K, File No. 001-33401, filed May 3, 2007).

4.8(a)		Indenture dated as of June 29, 2009, among Cinemark USA, Inc., the Guarantors named therein and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee governing the 8.625% Senior Notes due 2019 of Cinemark USA, Inc. issued thereunder (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-33401, filed July 6, 2009).

4.8(b)		Form of 8.625% Senior Notes due 2019 of Cinemark USA, Inc. (contained in the Indenture listed as Exhibit 4.2(a) above) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-33401, filed July 6, 2009).

4.9(a)		Indenture dated as of March 31, 2004 between Cinemark, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (formerly known as The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.) governing the 9.75% Senior Discount Notes issued thereunder (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2(a) to Cinemark, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-116292) filed June 8, 2004).

4.9(b)		First Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 29, 2009 between Cinemark, Inc., the subsidiary guarantors party thereto and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (formerly known as The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-33401, filed June 30, 2009).

10.1(a)		Management Agreement, dated December 10, 1993, between Laredo Theatre, Ltd. and Cinemark USA, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14(b) to Cinemark USA, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, File No. 033-47040, filed March 31, 1994).

10.1(b)		First Amendment to Management Agreement of Laredo Theatre, Ltd., effective as of December 10, 2003, between CNMK Texas Properties, Ltd. (successor in interest to Cinemark USA, Inc.) and Laredo Theatre Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1(d) to Cinemark, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-4, File No. 333-116292, filed June 8, 2004).

~~+10.2~~ +10.2(a)		Amended and Restated Agreement to Participate in Profits and Losses, dated as of March 12, 2004, between Cinemark USA, Inc. and Alan W. Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Cinemark USA, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 033-47040, filed May 14, 2004).

E-2


~~Number~~		~~Exhibit Title~~
10.4(b)		Tax Sharing Agreement, dated as of July 28, 1993, between Cinemark USA, Inc. and Cinemark Mexico (USA) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Cinemark Mexico (USA)’s Registration Statement on Form S-4, File No. 033-72114, filed on November 24, 1993).

~~+10.5(a)~~ +10.5(a)		Employment Agreement, dated as of March 12, 2004, between Cinemark, Inc. and Lee Roy Mitchell (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14(a) to Cinemark USA, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 033-47040, filed May 14, 2004).

~~+10.5(b)~~ +10.5(b)		First Amendment to Employment Agreement, effective as of December 12, 2006, by and between Cinemark, Inc. and Lee Roy Mitchell (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Cinemark, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-31372, filed December 18, 2006).

~~+10.5(c)~~ +10.5(c)		Employment Agreement, dated as of March 12, 2004, between Cinemark, Inc. and Alan Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14(b) to Cinemark USA, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 033-47040, filed May 14, 2004).

~~+10.5(d)~~ +10.5(d)		First Amendment to Employment Agreement, effective as of December 12, 2006, by and between Cinemark, Inc. and Alan W. Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Cinemark, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-31372, filed December 18, 2006).

~~+10.5(e)~~ +10.5(e)		Employment Agreement, dated as of March 12, 2004, between Cinemark, Inc. and Timothy Warner (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14(c) to Cinemark USA, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 033-47040, filed May 14, 2004).

~~+10.5(f)~~ +10.5(f)		First Amendment to Employment Agreement, effective as of December 12, 2006, by and between Cinemark, Inc. and Timothy Warner (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Cinemark, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-31372, filed December 18, 2006).

~~+10.5(g)~~ +10.5(g)		Employment Agreement, dated as of March 12, 2004, between Cinemark, Inc. and Robert Copple (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14(d) to Cinemark USA, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 033-47040, filed May 14, 2004).

~~+10.5(h)~~ +10.5(h)		First Amendment to Employment Agreement, effective as of January 25, 2007, between Cinemark, Inc. and Robert Copple (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5(j) to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed February 1, 2007).

~~+10.5(i)~~ +10.5(i)		Employment Agreement, dated as of March 12, 2004, between Cinemark, Inc. and Rob Carmony (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14(e) to Cinemark USA, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 033-47040, filed May 14, 2004).

~~+10.5(j)~~ +10.5(j)		First Amendment to Employment Agreement, effective as of January 14, 2008, between Cinemark, Inc. and Rob Carmony (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8K, File No. 001-33401, filed January 16, 2008).

~~+10.5(k)~~ +10.5(k)		Employment Agreement, dated as of March 12, 2004, between Cinemark, Inc. and Tandy Mitchell (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14(f) to Cinemark USA, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 033-47040, filed May 14, 2004).

+10.5(l)		Termination Agreement, dated as of June 16, 2008, between Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and Tandy Mitchell (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 001-33401, filed August 8, 2008).

+10.5(m)		Employment Agreement, dated as of June 16, 2008, between Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and Alan Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 333-140390, filed August 8, 2008).

+10.5(n)		Employment Agreement, dated as of June 16, 2008, between Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and Timothy Warner (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 333-140390, filed August 8, 2008).

+10.5(o)		Employment Agreement, dated as of June 16, 2008, between Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and Robert Copple (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 333-140390, filed August 8, 2008).

+10.5(p)		Employment Agreement, dated as of June 16, 2008, between Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and Michael Cavalier (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 333-140390, filed August 8, 2008).

+10.5(q)		Employment Agreement, dated as of December 15, 2008, between Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and Lee Roy Mitchell (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 (q) to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, File No. 001-33401, filed March 13, 2009).

+10.5(r)		Employment Agreement, dated as of December 15, 2008, between Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and Rob Carmony (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 (r) to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, File No. 001-33401, filed March 13, 2009).

+10.5(s)		Employment Agreement, dated as of December 15, 2008, between Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and John Lundin (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 (s) to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, File No. 001-33401, filed March 13, 2009).

+10.5(t)		Employment agreement, dated as of April 7, 2009, between Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and Steven Bunnell (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 001-33401, filed August 7, 2009).

*+10.5(u)		Employment Agreement, dated as of February 15, 2010, between Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and Valmir Fernandes.

10.6(a)		Credit Agreement, dated as of October 5, 2006, among Cinemark Holdings, Inc., Cinemark, Inc., CNMK Holding, Inc., Cinemark USA, Inc., the several banks and other financial institutions or entities from time to time parties to the Agreement, Lehman Brothers Inc. and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as syndication agent, BNP Paribas and General Electric Capital Corporation as co-documentation agents, and Lehman Commercial Paper Inc., as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 000-47040, filed by Cinemark USA, Inc. on October 12, 2006).

10.6(b)		First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of March 14, 2007 among Cinemark Holdings, Inc., Cinemark, Inc., CNMK Holding, Inc., Cinemark USA, Inc., the several banks and other financial institutions or entities from time to time parties thereto, Lehman Brothers Inc. and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as syndication agent, BNP Paribas and General Electric Capital Corporation, as co-documentation agents, and Lehman Commercial Paper Inc., as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6(b) to Amendment No. 1 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed March 16, 2007).

*10.6(c)		Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of January 29, 2010 by and among Lehman Commercial Paper Inc. (“Lehman”), a debtor and debtor in possession under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code as Administrative Agent, the Required Lenders, Barclay’s Bank PLC, as successor Administrative Agent, Cinemark USA, Inc. and each Loan Party.

10.6(d)		Third Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of March 2, 2010 by and among Cinemark Holdings, Inc., Cinemark USA, Inc., Barclays Bank PLC and the Required Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K , File No. 001-33401, filed on March 8, 2010).

E-3


10.6(e)		Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of October 5, 2006, among Cinemark Holdings, Inc., Cinemark, Inc., CNMK Holding, Inc., Cinemark USA, Inc. and each subsidiary guarantor party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 000-47040, filed by Cinemark USA, Inc. on October 12, 2006).

~~+10.7(a)~~ +10.7(a)		Cinemark Holdings, Inc. 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan, dated December 22, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7(a) to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed February 1, 2007).

~~+10.7(b)~~ +10.7(b)		First Amendment to Cinemark Holdings, Inc. 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan, dated December 22, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8K, File No. 001-33401, filed November 15, 2007).

~~+10.7(c)~~ +10.7(c)		Amended and Restated Cinemark Holdings, Inc. 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on form 10-Q, File No. 001-33401, filed May 9, 2008).

+10.7(d)		Form of Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7(b) to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed February 1, 2007).

~~+10.7(d)~~ +10.7(e)		Form of Restricted Share Award Agreement pursuant to the Amended and Restated Cinemark Holdings, Inc. 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 333-146349, filed ~~September 27, 2007)~~August 29, 2008).

+10.7(f)		Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement pursuant to the Amended and Restated Cinemark Holdings, Inc. 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 001-33401, filed May 9, 2008).

10.8		Exhibitor Services Agreement, dated as of February 13, 2007, by and between National CineMedia, LLC and Cinemark USA, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Amendment No. 1 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed March 16, 2007).

10.9		Third Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement, dated as of February 12, 2007, by and between Cinemark Media, Inc., American Multi-Cinema, Inc., Regal CineMedia, LLC and National CineMedia, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Amendment No. 1 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed March 16, 2007).


~~10.10(a)~~	10.10	(a)	Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century Stadium 14, Sacramento, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10(a) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.10(b)~~	10.10	(b)	First Amendment, dated as of September 1, 2000, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century Stadium 14, Sacramento, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10(b) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.10(c)~~	10.10	(c)	Second Amendment, dated as of April 15, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century Stadium 14, Sacramento, ~~CA.~~CA(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10(c) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).


~~Number~~	10.10	~~Exhibit Title~~
~~10.10(d)~~ (d)		Third Amendment, dated as of September 29, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century Stadium 14, Sacramento, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10(d) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.10(e)~~	10.10	(e)	Fourth Amendment, dated as of August 7, 2006, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century Stadium 14, Sacramento, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10(e) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.11(a)~~	10.11	(a)	Indenture of Lease, dated as of December 1, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century Laguna 16, Elk Grove, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11(a) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.11(b)~~	10.11	(b)	First Amendment, dated as of September 1, 2000, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of December 1, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century Laguna 16, Elk Grove, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11(b) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.11(c)~~	10.11	(c)	Second Amendment, dated as of April 15, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of December 1, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century Laguna 16, Elk Grove, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11(c) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.11(d)~~	10.11	(d)	Third Amendment, dated as of September 29, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of December 1, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century Laguna 16, Elk Grove, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11(d) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.11(e)~~	10.11	(e)	Fourth Amendment, dated as of August 7, 2006, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of December 1, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century Laguna 16, Elk Grove, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11(e) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.12(a)~~	10.12	(a)	Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century Capitol 16, San Jose, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12(a) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.12(b)~~	10.12	(b)	First Amendment, dated as of September 1, 2000, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century Capitol 16, San Jose, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12(b) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.12(c)~~	10.12	(c)	Second Amendment, dated as of April 15, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century Capitol 16, San Jose, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12(c) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

E-4


~~10.12(d)~~	10.12	(d)	Third Amendment, dated as of September 29, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century Capitol 16, San Jose, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12(d) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).
~~10.12(e)~~
	10.12	(e)	Fourth Amendment, dated as of August 7, 2006, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century Capitol 16, San Jose, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12(e) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.13(a)~~	10.13	(a)	Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century 10 Berryessa, San Jose, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13(a) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.13(b)~~	10.13	(b)	First Amendment, dated as of September 1, 2000, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century 10 Berryessa, San Jose, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13(b) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.13(c)~~	10.13	(c)	Second Amendment, dated as of April 15, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century 10 Berryessa, San Jose, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13(c) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.13(d)~~	10.13	(d)	Third Amendment, dated as of September 29, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century 10 Berryessa, San Jose, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13(d) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.13(e)~~	10.13	(e)	Fourth Amendment, dated as of August 7, 2006, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century 10 Berryessa, San Jose, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13(e) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.14(a)~~	10.14	(a)	Indenture of Lease, dated as of December 1, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century 14, Folsom, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14(a) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.14(b)~~	10.14	(b)	First Amendment, dated as of September 1, 2000, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of December 1, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century 14, Folsom, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14(b) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.14(d)~~	10.14	(c)	Second Amendment, dated as of April 15, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of December 1, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century 14, Folsom, CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14(c) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

	10.14	(d)	Third Amendment, dated as of September 29, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of December 1, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century 14, Folsom, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14(d) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.14(e)~~	10.14	(e)	Fourth Amendment, dated as of August 7, 2006, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of December 1, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century 14, Folsom, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14(e) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.15(a)~~	10.15	(a)	Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of Nevada, Inc., as tenant, for Cinedome 12, Henderson, ~~NV.~~NV (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15(a) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.15(b)~~	10.15	(b)	First Amendment, dated as of September 1, 2000, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of Nevada, Inc., as tenant, for Cinedome 12, Henderson, ~~NV.~~NV (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15(b) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.15(c)~~	10.15	(c)	Second Amendment, dated as of April 15, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of Nevada, Inc., as tenant, for Cinedome 12, Henderson, ~~NV.~~NV (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15(c) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.15(d)~~	10.15	(d)	Third Amendment, dated as of September 29, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of Nevada, Inc., as tenant, for Cinedome 12, Henderson, ~~NV.~~NV (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15(d) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.15(e)~~	10.15	(e)	Fourth Amendment, dated as of August 7, 2006, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of Nevada, Inc., as tenant, for Cinedome 12, Henderson, ~~NV.~~NV (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15(e) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.16(a)~~	10.16	(a)	Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century Park 12, Redwood City, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16(a) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.16(b)~~	10.16	(b)	First Amendment, dated as of September 1, 2000, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century Park 12, Redwood City, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16(b) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

E-5


~~Number~~	10.17	~~Exhibit Title~~
~~10.17(a)~~ (a)		Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century 8, North Hollywood, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17(a) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.17(b)~~	10.17	(b)	First Amendment, dated as of September 1, 2000, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century 8, North Hollywood, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17(b) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.17(c)~~	10.17	(c)	Second Amendment, dated as of April 15, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century 8, North Hollywood, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17(c) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.17(d)~~	10.17	(d)	Third Amendment, dated as of September 29, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century 8, North Hollywood, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17(d) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.17(e)~~	10.17	(e)	Third Amendment, dated as of August 7, 2006, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century 8, North Hollywood, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17(e) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.18(a)~~	10.18	(a)	Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century Plaza 10, S. San Francisco, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18(a) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

	10.18
~~10.18(b)~~ (b)		First Amendment, dated as of October 31, 1996, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century Plaza 10, S. San Francisco, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18(b) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.18(c)~~	10.18	(c)	Second Amendment, dated as of September 1, 2000, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century Plaza 10, S. San Francisco, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18(c) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.18(d)~~	10.18	(d)	Third Amendment, dated as of April 15, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century Plaza 10, S. San Francisco, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18(d) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.18(e)~~	10.18	(e)	Fourth Amendment, dated as of September 29, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century Plaza 10, S. San Francisco, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18(e) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.18(f)~~	10.18	(f)	Fifth Amendment, dated as of August 7, 2006, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century Plaza 10, S. San Francisco, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18(f) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.19(a)~~	10.19	(a)	Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Cinedome 8, Freemont, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19(a) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.19(b)~~	10.19	(b)	First Amendment, dated as of September 1, 2000, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Cinedome 8, Freemont, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19(b) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.19(c)~~	10.19	(c)	Second Amendment, dated as of April 15, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Cinedome 8, Freemont, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19(c) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.19(d)~~	10.19	(d)	Third Amendment, dated as of September 29, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Cinedome 8, Freemont, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19(d) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.19(e)~~	10.19	(e)	Fourth Amendment, dated as of August 7, 2006, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Cinedome 8, Freemont, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19(e) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

E-6


~~10.20(a)~~	10.20	(a)	Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Cinedome 7, Newark, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20(a) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.20(b)~~	10.20	(b)	First Amendment, dated as of September 1, 2000, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Cinedome 7, Newark, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20(b) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.20(c)~~	10.20	(c)	Second Amendment, dated as of April 15, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Cinedome 7, Newark, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20(c) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.20(d)~~	10.20	(d)	Third Amendment, dated as of September 29, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Cinedome 7, Newark, ~~CA.~~CA(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20(d) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.20(e)~~	10.20	(e)	Fourth Amendment, dated as of August 7, 2006, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Cinedome 7, Newark, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20(e) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.21(a)~~	10.21	(a)	Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century Cinema 16, Mountain View, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21(a) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.21(b)~~	10.21	(b)	First Amendment, dated as of September 1, 2000, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century Cinema 16, Mountain View, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21(b) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.21(c)~~	10.21	(c)	Second Amendment, dated as of April 15, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century Cinema 16, Mountain View, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21(c) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.21(d)~~	10.21	(d)	Third Amendment, dated as of September 29, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century Cinema 16, Mountain View, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21(d) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.21(e)~~	10.21	(e)	Fourth Amendment, dated as of August 7, 2006, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century Cinema 16, Mountain View, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21(e) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.22(a)~~	10.22	(a)	Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Sycal Properties, Inc. (succeeded by Syufy Properties, Inc.), as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Cinearts 5, Pleasant Hill, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22(a) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.22(b)~~	10.22	(b)	First Amendment, dated as of September 1, 2000, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Cinearts 5, Pleasant Hill, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22(b) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.22(c)~~	10.22	(c)	Second Amendment, dated as of April 15, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Cinearts 5, Pleasant Hill, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22(c) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.22(d)~~	10.22	(d)	Third Amendment, dated as of September 29, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Cinearts 5, Pleasant Hill, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22(d) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).


~~Number~~	10.22	~~Exhibit Title~~
~~10.22(e)~~ (e)		Fourth Amendment, dated as of August 7, 2006, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Cinearts 5, Pleasant Hill, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22(e) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.23(a)~~	10.23	(a)	Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century 24, San Jose, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23(a) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.23(b)~~	10.23	(b)	First Amendment, dated as of September 1, 2000, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century 24, San Jose, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23(b) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.23(c)~~	10.23	(c)	Second Amendment, dated as of April 15, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century 24, San Jose, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23(c) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.23(d)~~	10.23	(d)	Third Amendment, dated as of September 29, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century 24, San Jose, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23(d) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

E-7


~~10.23(e)~~	10.23	(e)	Fourth Amendment, dated as of August 7, 2006, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century 24, San Jose, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23(e) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.24(a)~~	10.24	(a)	Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Cinedome 8, Napa, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24(a) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.24(b)~~	10.24	(b)	First Amendment, dated as of September 1, 2000, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Cinedome 8, Napa, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24(b) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.24(c)~~	10.24	(c)	Second Amendment, dated as of April 15, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Cinedome 8, Napa, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24(c) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.24(d)~~	10.24	(d)	Third Amendment, dated as of September 29, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Cinedome 8, Napa, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24(d) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.24(e)~~	10.24	(e)	Fourth Amendment, dated as of August 7, 2006, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Cinedome 8, Napa, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24(e) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.25(a)~~	10.25	(a)	Lease Agreement, dated as of April 10, 1998, by and between Dyer Triangle LLC, as landlord and Century Theatres, Inc., as tenant, for Century 25 Union Landing, Union City, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25(a) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.25(b)~~	10.25	(b)	First Amendment, dated as of April 15, 2005, to Lease Agreement, dated as of April 10, 1998, by and between Dyer Triangle LLC, as landlord and Century Theatres, Inc., as tenant, for Century 25 Union Landing, Union City, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25(b) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.25(c)~~	10.25	(c)	Second Amendment, dated as of September 29, 2005, to Lease Agreement, dated as of April 10, 1998, by and between Dyer Triangle LLC, as landlord and Century Theatres, Inc., as tenant, for Century 25 Union Landing, Union City, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25(c) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.25(d)~~	10.25	(d)	Third Amendment, dated as of August 5, 2006, to Lease Agreement, dated as of April 10, 1998, by and between Dyer Triangle LLC, as landlord and Century Theatres, Inc., as tenant, for Century 25 Union Landing, Union City, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25(d) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.26(a)~~	10.26	(a)	Indenture of Lease, dated as of March 7, 1997, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres, Inc., as tenant, for Century Sparks, Sparks, ~~NV.~~NV (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26(a) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.26(b)~~	10.26	(b)	First Amendment, dated as of April 15, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of March 7, 1997, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres, Inc., as tenant, for Century Sparks, Sparks, ~~NV.~~NV (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26(b) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.26(c)~~	10.26	(c)	Second Amendment, dated as of September 29, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of March 7, 1997, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres, Inc., as tenant, for Century Sparks, Sparks, ~~NV.~~NV (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26(c) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.26(d)~~	10.26	(d)	Third Amendment, dated as of August 7, 2006, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of March 7, 1997, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres, Inc., as tenant, for Century Sparks, Sparks, ~~NV.~~NV (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26(d) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.27(a)~~	10.27	(a)	Lease Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1996, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P.(succeeded by Stadium Promenade LLC), as landlord and Century Theatres, Inc., as tenant, for Century Stadium 25, Orange, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27(a) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.27(b)~~	10.27	(b)	First Amendment, dated as of April 15, 2005, to Lease Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1996, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P.(succeeded by Stadium Promenade LLC), as landlord and Century Theatres, Inc., as tenant, for Century Stadium 25, Orange, ~~CA.~~(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27(b) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.27(c)~~	10.27	(c)	Second Amendment, dated as of September 29, 2005, to Lease Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1996, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P.(succeeded by Stadium Promenade LLC), as landlord and Century Theatres, Inc., as tenant, for Century Stadium 25, Orange, ~~CA.~~(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27(c) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.27(d)~~	10.27	(d)	Third Amendment, dated as of August 5, 2006, to Lease Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1996, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P.(succeeded by Stadium Promenade LLC), as landlord and Century Theatres, Inc., as tenant, for Century Stadium 25, Orange, ~~CA.~~(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27(d) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.28(a)~~	10.28	(a)	Indenture of Lease, dated as of July 1, 1996, by and between Synm Properties Inc.(succeeded by Syufy Properties, Inc.), as landlord and Century Theatres, Inc., as tenant, Century Rio 24, Albuquerque, ~~NM.~~NM(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28(a) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.28(b)~~	10.28	(b)	First Amendment, dated as of April 15, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of July 1, 1996, by and between Synm Properties Inc.(succeeded by Syufy Properties, Inc.), as landlord and Century Theatres, Inc., as tenant, Century Rio 24, Albuquerque, ~~NM.~~NM (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28(b) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

E-8


~~10.28(c)~~	10.28	(c)	Second Amendment, dated as of September 29, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of July 1, 1996, by and between Synm Properties Inc.(succeeded by Syufy Properties, Inc.), as landlord and Century Theatres, Inc., as tenant, Century Rio 24, Albuquerque, ~~NM.~~NM (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28(c) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.28(d)~~	10.28	(d)	Third Amendment, dated as of August 7, 2006, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of July 1, 1996, by and between Synm Properties Inc.(succeeded by Syufy Properties, Inc.), as landlord and Century Theatres, Inc., as tenant, Century Rio 24, Albuquerque, ~~NM.~~NM (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28(d) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.29(a)~~	10.29	(a)	Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 3, 1996, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres, Inc., as tenant, for Century 14, Roseville, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29(a) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.29(b)~~	10.29	(b)	First Amendment, dated as of April 15, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 3, 1996, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres, Inc., as tenant, for Century 14, Roseville, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29(b) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.29(c)~~	10.29	(c)	Second Amendment, dated as of September 29, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 3, 1996, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres, Inc., as tenant, for Century 14, Roseville, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29(c) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).


~~Number~~	10.29	~~Exhibit Title~~
~~10.29(d)~~ (d)		Third Amendment, dated as of August 7, 2006, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 3, 1996, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres, Inc., as tenant, for Century 14, Roseville, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29(d) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.30(a)~~	10.30	(a)	Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of Nevada, Inc., as tenant, for Rancho Santa Fe 16, Las Vegas, ~~NV.~~NV (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30(a) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.30(b)~~	10.30	(b)	First Amendment, dated as of September 1, 2000, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of Nevada, Inc., as tenant, for Rancho Santa Fe 16, Las Vegas, ~~NV.~~NV (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30(b) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.30(c)~~	10.30	(c)	Second Amendment, dated as of September 30, 2006, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of Nevada, Inc., as tenant, for Rancho Santa Fe 16, Las Vegas, ~~NV.~~NV (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30(c) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.31(a)~~	10.31	(a)	Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century Stadium 16, Ventura, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31(a) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.31(b)~~	10.31	(b)	First Amendment, dated as of October 1, 1996, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century Stadium 16, Ventura, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31(b) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.31(c)~~	10.31	(c)	Second Amendment, dated as of September 1, 2000, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century Stadium 16, Ventura, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31(c) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.31(d)~~	10.31	(d)	Third Amendment, dated as of April 15, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century Stadium 16, Ventura, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31(d) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.31(e)~~	10.31	(e)	Fourth Amendment, dated as of August 7, 2006, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century Stadium 16, Ventura, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31(e) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.32(a)~~	10.32	(a)	Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Northridge 14, Salinas, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32(a) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.32(b)~~	10.32	(b)	First Amendment, dated as of September 1, 2000, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Northridge 14, Salinas, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32(b) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.32(c)~~	10.32	(c)	Second Amendment, dated as of October 1, 2001, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Northridge 14, Salinas, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32(c) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.32(d)~~	10.32	(d)	Third Amendment, dated as of August 7, 2006, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Northridge 14, Salinas, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32(d) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.33(a)~~	10.33	(a)	Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syut Properties, Inc. (succeeded by Syufy Enterprises, L.P.), as landlord and Century Theatres of Utah, Inc., as tenant, for Century 16, Salt Lake City, ~~UT.~~UT (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33(a) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

E-9


~~10.33(b)~~	10.33	(b)	First Amendment, dated as of January 4, 1998, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syut Properties, Inc. (succeeded by Syufy Enterprises, L.P.), as landlord and Century Theatres of Utah, Inc., as tenant, for Century 16, Salt Lake City, ~~UT.~~UT (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33(b) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.33(c)~~	10.33	(c)	Second Amendment, dated as of September 1, 2000, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syut Properties, Inc. (succeeded by Syufy Enterprises, L.P.), as landlord and Century Theatres of Utah, Inc., as tenant, for Century 16, Salt Lake City, ~~UT.~~UT (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33(c) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.33(d)~~	10.33	(d)	Third Amendment, dated as of April 15, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syut Properties, Inc. (succeeded by Syufy Enterprises, L.P.), as landlord and Century Theatres of Utah, Inc., as tenant, for Century 16, Salt Lake City, ~~UT.~~UT (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33(d) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.33(e)~~	10.33	(e)	Fourth Amendment, dated as of April 15, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syut Properties, Inc. (succeeded by Syufy Enterprises, L.P.), as landlord and Century Theatres of Utah, Inc., as tenant, for Century 16, Salt Lake City, ~~UT.~~UT (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33(e) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.33(f)~~	10.33	(f)	Fourth Amendment, dated as of August 7, 2006, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syut Properties, Inc. (succeeded by Syufy Enterprises, L.P.), as landlord and Century Theatres of Utah, Inc., as tenant, for Century 16, Salt Lake City, ~~UT.~~UT (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33(f) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.34(a)~~	10.34	(a)	Indenture of Lease, dated as of April 17, 1998, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres, Inc., as tenant, for Century Larkspur, Larkspur, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34(a) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.34(b)~~	10.34	(b)	First Amendment, dated as of April 30, 2003, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of April 17, 1998, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres, Inc., as tenant, for Century Larkspur, Larkspur, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34(b) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.34(c)~~	10.34	(c)	Second Amendment, dated as of April 15, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of April 17, 1998, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres, Inc., as tenant, for Century Larkspur, Larkspur, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34(c) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.34(d)~~	10.34	(d)	Third Amendment, dated as of September 29, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of April 17, 1998, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres, Inc., as tenant, for Century Larkspur, Larkspur, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34(d) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.34(e)~~	10.34	(e)	Fourth Amendment, dated as of August 7, 2006, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of April 17, 1998, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres, Inc., as tenant, for Century Larkspur, Larkspur, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34(e) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.35(a)~~	10.35	(a)	Indenture of Lease, dated as of August 1, 1997, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres, Inc., as tenant, for Century Park Lane 16, Reno, ~~NV.~~NV (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35(a) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.35(b)~~	10.35	(b)	First Amendment, dated as of April 15, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of August 1, 1997, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres, Inc., as tenant, for Century Park Lane 16, Reno, ~~NV.~~NV (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35(b) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.35(c)~~	10.35	(c)	Second Amendment, dated as of September 29, 2005, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of August 1, 1997, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres, Inc., as tenant, for Century Park Lane 16, Reno, ~~NV.~~NV (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35(c) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.35(d)~~	10.35	(d)	Third Amendment, dated as of August 7, 2006, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of August 1, 1997, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres, Inc., as tenant, for Century Park Lane 16, Reno, ~~NV.~~NV (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35(d) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.36(a)~~	10.36	(a)	Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century 16, Sacramento, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36(a) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.36(b)~~	10.36	(b)	First Amendment, dated as of September 1, 2000, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century 16, Sacramento, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36(b) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).


~~10.36(f)~~	10.36	(f)	Fifth Amendment, dated as of August 7, 2006, to Indenture of Lease, dated as of September 30, 1995, by and between Syufy Enterprises, L.P., as landlord and Century Theatres of California, Inc., as tenant, for Century 16, Sacramento, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36(f) to Amendment No. 5 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 20, 2007).

~~10.37(a)~~	10.37	(a)	Lease Agreement, dated as of October 31, 1997, by and between Sycal Properties, Inc. (succeeded by 150 Pelican LLC), as landlord and Century Theatres, Inc., as tenant, for office building situated at 150 Pelican Way, San Rafael, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37(a) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.37(b)~~	10.37	(b)	First Amendment, dated as of December 1, 1998, to Lease Agreement, dated as of October 31, 1997, by and between Sycal Properties, Inc. (succeeded by 150 Pelican LLC), as landlord and Century Theatres, Inc., as tenant, for office building situated at 150 Pelican Way, San Rafael, ~~CA.~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37(b) to Amendment No. 3 to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-140390, filed April 18, 2007).

~~10.37(c)~~	10.37	(c)	Second Amendment, dated as of October 4, 2006, to Lease Agreement, dated as of October 31, 1997, by and between Sycal Properties, Inc. (succeeded by 150 Pelican LLC), as landlord and Century Theatres, Inc., as tenant, for office building situated at 150 Pelican Way, San Rafael, ~~CA.~~

~~10.38~~		~~Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 7, 2006, by and among Cinemark USA, Inc, Cinemark Holdings, Inc., Syufy Enterprises LP, Century Theatres, Inc. and Century Theatres Holdings, LLC~~CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit ~~10.1~~10.37(c) to ~~current Report on Form 8-K, File No, 000-47040, filed by Cinemark USA, Inc. on August 11, 2006).~~

~~10 .39~~		~~Termination Agreement to Amended and Restated Agreement to Participate in Profits and Losses, dated as of May~~Amendment No. 3 ~~2007, by and between Cinemark USA, Inc. and Alan W. Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2~~ to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s ~~Current Report~~Registration Statement on Form ~~8-K,~~S-1, File No. ~~001-33401,~~333-140390, filed ~~May 3,~~April 18, 2007).


*12		Calculation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.

*21		Subsidiaries of Cinemark Holdings, Inc.

*23.1		Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.

*23.2		Consent of National CineMedia, LLC.

*23.3		Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.

*~~23.4~~		~~Consent of BIA Financial Networks, Inc.~~

*31 .131.1		Certification of Alan Stock, Chief Executive ~~Officer.~~Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

*~~31 .2~~31.2		Certification of Robert Copple, Chief Financial ~~Officer.~~Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

*~~32 .1~~32.1		Certification of Alan Stock, Chief Executive ~~Officer.~~Officer, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

*~~32 .2~~32.2		Certification of Robert Copple, Chief Financial ~~Officer.~~Officer, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


*		Filed herewith.

+		Any management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement.

E-11


	Payments Due by Period										Payments Due by Period
	(in millions)										(in millions)
			Less Than						After				Less Than						After
Contractual Obligations	Total		One Year		1 - 3 Years		4 - 5 Years		5 Years		Total		One Year		1 - 3 Years		4 - 5 Years		5 Years
Long-term debt⁽¹⁾	$	1,574.4	$	9.2	$	26.2	$	282.8	$	1,256.2	$	1,554.8	$	12.2	$	282.8	$	789.8	$	470.0
Scheduled interest payments on long-term debt⁽²⁾	$	605.8		73.8		226.6		224.1		81.3		497.5		74.1		144.9		97.8		180.7
Operating lease obligations	$	1,958.4		177.1		349.2		328.7		1,103.4		1,865.6		192.6		375.5		358.2		939.3
Capital lease obligations	$	121.2		4.7		10.3		10.9		95.3		140.4		7.3		15.1		19.3		98.7
Scheduled interest payments on capital leases	$	113.6		12.3		23.1		20.8		57.4		108.0		14.0		25.8		22.3		45.9
Letters of credit	$	0.1		0.1		—		—		—
Employment agreements	$	10.5		3.5		7.0		—		—		11.1		3.7		7.4		—		—
Purchase commitments⁽³⁾	$	138.2		88.9		47.6		1.5		0.2		63.0		32.9		29.5		0.5		0.1
Current liability for uncertain tax positions⁽⁴⁾												13.2		13.2		—		—		—

Total obligations⁽⁴⁾	$	4,522.2	$	369.6	$	690.0	$	868.8	$	2,593.8	$	4,253.6	$	350.0	$	881.0	$	1,287.9	$	1,734.7


	Page
CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
~~CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:~~
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-2

Consolidated Balance Sheets, December 31, ~~2006~~2008 and ~~2007~~2009		F-3

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 and ~~2007~~2009		F-4

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Years Ended December 31, ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 and ~~2007~~2009		F-5

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 and ~~2007~~2009		F-6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-7

Schedule I — Condensed Financial Information of Registrant		F-42

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF 50-PERCENT-OR-LESS-OWNED INVESTEE		~~F-40~~F-48


	Page
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements		1

PART I
Item 1. Business		2
Item 1A. Risk Factors		1214
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments		20
Item 2. Properties		1621
Item 3. Legal Proceedings		1721
Item 4. ~~Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders~~Reserved		1721

PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, ~~and~~ Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities		1822
Item 6. Selected Financial Data		2025
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		2227
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		4147
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data		4348
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure		4348
Item ~~9A(T).~~9A. Controls and Procedures		4349

PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance		4451
Item 11. Executive Compensation		4451
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters		4451
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence		4451
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services		4451

PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules		4451

SIGNATURES		52
~~Calculation of Earnings to Fixed Charges~~EX-10.5.U
~~Subsidiaries~~EX-10.6.C
~~Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP~~EX-12
~~Consent of National CineMedia LLC~~EX-21
~~Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP~~EX-23.1
~~Consent of BIA Financial Networks, Inc.~~EX-23.2
~~Certification of CEO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)~~EX-23.3
~~Certification of CFO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)~~EX-31.1
~~Certification of CEO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)~~EX-31.2
~~Certification of CFO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)~~EX-32.1
EX-32.2


⁽¹⁾		Includes Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama and ~~Panama.~~Guatemala.


	Fiscal 2007
	High		Low
Second Quarter (April 23, 2007 – June 30, 2007)	$	20.69	$	16.15
Third Quarter (July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007)	$	19.48	$	14.83
Fourth Quarter (October 1, 2007 – December 31, 2007)	$	20.00	$	15.81



	4/24/07		12/31/07
Cinemark Holdings, Inc.	$	100	$	90
S&P © 500		100		99
Peer group		100		59


	Cinemark,				Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
	Inc.				Successor
	Predecessor				As of December 31,						As of December 31,
	2003		2004		2005		2006		2007		2005		2006		2007		2008		2009
			(Dollars in thousands)								(Dollars in thousands)
Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	107,322	$	100,248	$	182,199	$	147,099	$	338,043	$	182,199	$	147,099	$	338,043	$	349,603	$	437,936
Theatre properties and equipment, net		775,880		794,723		803,269		1,324,572		1,314,066		803,269		1,324,572		1,314,066		1,208,283		1,219,588
Total assets		960,736		1,831,855		1,864,852		3,171,582		3,296,892		1,864,852		3,171,582		3,296,892		3,065,708		3,276,448
Total long-term debt and capital lease obligations, including current portion		658,431		1,026,055		1,055,095		2,027,480		1,644,915		1,055,095		2,027,480		1,644,915		1,632,174		1,684,073
Stockholders’ equity		76,946		533,200		519,349		689,297		1,019,203		535,771		705,910		1,035,385		824,227		914,628


⁽¹⁾		~~Statement~~For the purposes of ~~Operations Data (other than net~~calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings consist of income (loss)) before income taxes plus fixed charges excluding capitalized interest. Fixed charges consist of interest expense, capitalized interest, amortization of debt issue costs and ~~attendance data exclude the results~~that portion of rental expense which we believe to be representative of the ~~two United Kingdom theatres and eleven Interstate theatres for all periods presented as these theatres were sold during~~interest factor. For the ~~period from April 2, 2004 to~~years ended December 31, ~~2004. The results of operations for these theatres in the 2003~~2005 and ~~2004 periods are presented as discontinued operations.~~2008, earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $15.6 million and $27.1 million, respectively.

⁽²⁾		Includes the cash portion of the Century Acquisition purchase price of $531.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2006.

⁽³⁾		The data excludes certain theatres operated by us in the U.S. pursuant to management agreements that are not part of our consolidated operations.

⁽⁴⁾		The data excludes certain theatres operated internationally through our affiliates that are not part of our consolidated operations.

⁽⁵⁾		The data for 2003 excludes theatres, screens and attendance for eight theatres and 46 screens acquired on December 31, 2003, as the results of operations for these theatres are not included in our 2003 consolidated results of operations.

⁽⁶⁾		For the purposes of calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings consist of income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes plus fixed charges excluding capitalized interest. Fixed charges consist of interest expense, capitalized interest, amortization of debt issue cost and that portion of rental expense which we believe to be representative of the interest factor. For the period from January 1, 2004 to April 1, 2004, earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $12.7 million.


⁽¹⁾		All costs are expressed as a percentage of total revenues, except film rentals and advertising, which are expressed as a percentage of admissions revenues and concession supplies, which are expressed as a percentage of concession revenues.

⁽²⁾		~~Excludes depreciation and amortization expense.~~


	U.S. Operating Segment							International Operating Segment							Consolidated
	Year Ended							Year Ended							Year Ended
	December 31,							December 31,							December 31,
					%							%							%
	2006		2007		Change			2006		2007		Change			2006		2007		Change
Admissions revenues (in millions)	$	577.9	$	879.1		52.1	%	$	182.4	$	208.4		14.3	%	$	760.3	$	1,087.5		43.0	%
Concession revenues (in millions)	$	297.4	$	424.4		42.7	%	$	78.4	$	92.1		17.5	%	$	375.8	$	516.5		37.4	%
Other revenues (in millions)⁽¹⁾	$	59.4	$	45.6		(23.2	)%	$	25.1	$	33.2		32.3	%	$	84.5	$	78.8		(6.7	)%
Total revenues (in millions)⁽¹⁾	$	934.7	$	1,349.1		44.3	%	$	285.9	$	333.7		16.7	%	$	1,220.6	$	1,682.8		37.9	%
Attendance (in millions)		118.7		151.7		27.8	%		59.6		61.0		2.3	%		178.3		212.7		19.3	%
Revenues per average screen⁽¹⁾	$	346,812	$	376,771		8.6	%	$	306,459	$	341,451		11.4	%	$	336,437	$	369,200		9.7	%


																	International
					International Operating								U.S. Operating				Operating
	U.S. Operating Segment				Segment				Consolidated				Segment				Segment				Consolidated
	Year Ended				Year Ended				Year Ended				Year Ended				Year Ended				Year Ended
	December 31,				December 31,				December 31,				December 31,				December 31,				December 31,
	2006		2007		2006		2007		2006		2007		2008		2007		2008		2007		2008		2007
Film rentals and advertising	$	315.4	$	485.2	$	90.6	$	104.5	$	406.0	$	589.7	$	494.6	$	485.2	$	117.6	$	104.5	$	612.2	$	589.7
Concession supplies		38.7		57.8		20.3		23.3	$	59.0	$	81.1	$	58.5	$	57.8	$	28.1	$	23.3	$	86.6	$	81.1
Salaries and wages		95.8		146.7		22.8		26.6	$	118.6	$	173.3	$	149.5	$	146.7	$	31.5	$	26.6	$	181.0	$	173.3
Facility lease expense		117.0		161.7		44.4		51.0	$	161.4	$	212.7	$	166.8	$	161.7	$	58.8	$	51.0	$	225.6	$	212.7
Utilities and other		108.3		149.0		36.5		42.3	$	144.8	$	191.3	$	151.8	$	149.0	$	54.0	$	42.3	$	205.8	$	191.3

Total theatre operating costs	$	675.2	$	1,000.4	$	214.6	$	247.7	$	889.8	$	1,248.1


•		International. Film rentals and advertising costs were $117.6 million, or 49.4% of admissions revenues, for 2008 compared to $104.5 million, or 50.1% of admissions revenues, for ~~2007 compared to $90.6 million, or 49.7% of admissions revenues, for 2006.~~2007. The increase in film rentals and advertising costs of ~~$13.9~~$13.1 million iswas due to a ~~$26.0~~$29.5 million increase in admissions revenues, ~~which contributed $12.9 million and an increase~~partially offset by a decrease in our film ~~rental~~rentals and advertising ~~rate, which contributed $1.0 million.~~rate. Concession supplies expense was $28.1 million, or 25.9% of concession revenues, for 2008 compared to $23.3 million, or 25.3% of concession revenues, for ~~2007 compared to $20.3 million, or 25.9% of concession revenues, for 2006.~~2007. The increase in concession supplies expense of ~~$3.0~~$4.8 million iswas primarily due to the $16.2 million increase in concession revenues and the increased rate due to increases in product costs from some of our concession ~~revenues.~~suppliers.


	Cinemark, Inc.							Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
	Predecessor				Successor
			Period
			from
			January 1,			Period from
			2004			April 2, 2004		Year Ended December 31,
	Year Ended		to			to
	December		April 1,			December 31,
	31, 2003		2004			2004		2005		2006		2007		Year Ended December 31,
														2005		2006		2007		2008		2009
Operating Data:
United States⁽³⁾⁽⁵⁾
United States⁽³⁾
Theatres operated (at period end)		189		191			191		200		281		287		200		281		287		293		294
Screens operated (at period end)		2,244		2,262			2,303		2,417		3,523		3,654		2,417		3,523		3,654		3,742		3,830
Total attendance⁽¹⁾ (in 000s)		112,581		25,790			87,856		105,573		118,714		151,712
Total attendance (in 000s)															105,573		118,714		151,712		147,897		165,112
International⁽⁴⁾
Theatres operated (at period end)		97		95			101		108		115		121		108		115		121		127		130
Screens operated (at period end)		852		835			869		912		965		1,011		912		965		1,011		1,041		1,066
Total attendance⁽¹⁾ (in 000s)		60,553		15,791			49,904		60,104		59,550		60,958
Worldwide^(3)(4)(5)
Total attendance (in 000s)															60,104		59,550		60,958		63,413		71,622
Worldwide⁽³⁾⁽⁴⁾
Theatres operated (at period end)		286		286			292		308		396		408		308		396		408		420		424
Screens operated (at period end)		3,096		3,097			3,172		3,329		4,488		4,665		3,329		4,488		4,665		4,783		4,896
Total attendance⁽¹⁾ (in 000s)		173,134		41,581			137,760		165,677		178,264		212,670
Total attendance (in 000s)															165,677		178,264		212,670		211,310		236,734


		Salaries and wages increased to $31.5 million for 2008 from $26.6 million for 2007, ~~from $22.8 million for 2006 primarily due to new theatre openings. Facility~~facility lease expense increased to $58.8 million for 2008 from $51.0 million for 2007 ~~from $44.4 million for 2006 primarily due to increased percentage rent related to increased revenues~~ and ~~new theatre openings. Utilities~~utilities and other costs increased to $54.0 million for 2008 from $42.3 million for 2007, ~~from $36.5 million for 2006~~all of which increased primarily due to ~~higher utility costs at our existing theatres and~~increased revenues, new theatre ~~openings.~~openings and the impact of exchange rates in certain countries in which we operate.


⁽¹⁾		Includes the $470.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 8.625% senior notes before the original issue discount, which was $11.1 million as of December 31, 2009.


⁽¹⁾		Includes the 9³/4%8.625% senior ~~discount~~ notes in the aggregate principal amount ~~at maturity~~ of ~~$466.4~~$470.0 million excluding the discount of $11.1 million.

⁽²⁾		Amounts include scheduled interest payments on fixed rate and variable rate debt agreements. Estimates for the variable rate interest payments were based on interest rates in effect on December 31, ~~2007.~~2009. The average interest rates on our fixed rate and variable rate debt were ~~8.2%~~7.6% and ~~6.7%~~2.0%, respectively, as of December 31, ~~2007.~~2009.

⁽³⁾		Includes estimated capital expenditures associated with the construction of new theatres to which we were committed as of December 31, ~~2007.~~2009.

⁽⁴⁾		The contractual obligations table excludes the ~~Company’s FIN 48 liabilities~~long-term portion of ~~$15.5~~our liability for uncertain tax positions of $18.4 million because ~~the Company~~we cannot make a reliable estimate of the timing of the related cash payments.


	Expected Maturity as of December 31, 2007
	(in millions)
																	Average
															Fair		Interest
	2008		2009		2010		2011		2012		Thereafter		Total		Value		Rate
Fixed rate⁽¹⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	966.6	$	966.6	$	940.1		8.2	%
Variable rate		9.2		13.8		12.4		11.2		271.6		289.6		607.8		612.8		6.7	%

Total debt	$	9.2	$	13.8	$	12.4	$	11.2	$	271.6	$	1,256.2	$	1,574.4	$	1,552.9


	Expected Maturity as of December 31, 2006																			Expected Maturity for the Twelve-Month Periods Ending December 31,
	(in millions)																			(in millions)																Average
																	Average																	Fair		Interest
															Fair		Interest			2010		2011		2012		2013		2014		Thereafter		Total		Value		Rate
	2007		2008		2009		2010		2011		Thereafter		Total		Value		Rate
Fixed rate	$	0.1	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	886.4	$	886.5	$	812.1		9.5	%
Fixed rate⁽¹⁾																				$	—	$	—	$	—	$	300.2	$	—	$	470.0	$	770.2	$	772.4		7.6	%
Variable rate		14.2		14.9		12.8		12.4		11.2		1,061.2		1,126.7		1,146.8		7.4	%		12.2		11.2		271.6		489.6		—	$	—		784.6		741.4		2.0	%

Total debt	$	14.3	$	14.9	$	12.8	$	12.4	$	11.2	$	1,947.6	$	2,013.2	$	1,958.9				$	12.2	$	11.2	$	271.6	$	789.8	$	—	$	470.0	$	1,554.8	$	1,513.8


⁽¹⁾		Includes ~~$500.0~~$300.0 million of the Cinemark USA, Inc. term loan, which represents the debt hedged with our interest rate swap agreements.


Item 9.		Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure


	September 30, 2004			January 28, 2005
	Grant			Grant
Expected life	6.5		years	6.5		years
Expected volatility⁽¹⁾		39	%		44	%
Risk-free interest rate		3.79	%		3.93	%
Dividend yield		0	%		0	%
Grant date fair value	$	3.51		$	3.80


Net loss as reported	$	(25,408	)
Compensation expense included in reported net loss, net of tax		—
Compensation expense under fair-value method, net of tax		(2,964	)

Pro-forma net loss	$	(28,372	)

Basic and diluted loss per share
As Reported	$	(0.31	)
Pro-forma	$	(0.35	)


Current assets⁽¹⁾	$	32,635
Fixed assets⁽²⁾		548,451
Goodwill⁽²⁾		640,436
Tradename		136,000
Other long term assets		4,956
Net unfavorable leases		(9,360	)
Current liabilities		(74,488	)
Other long term liabilities⁽²⁾		(229,957	)

Total	$	1,048,673


	Pro Forma			Pro Forma
	Year Ended			Year Ended
	December 31, 2005			December 31, 2006
	(unaudited)
Revenues
Admissions	$	982,699		$	1,029,881
Concession		457,190			487,416
Other		74,559			94,807

Total revenues	$	1,514,448		$	1,612,104
Cost of operations
Film rentals and advertising		526,002			546,144
Concession supplies		72,631			75,359
Salaries and wages		154,072			160,689
Facility lease expense		194,394			206,950
Utilities and other		169,507			184,699
General and administrative expenses⁽¹⁾		77,338			84,619
Depreciation and amortization⁽²⁾⁽³⁾		140,994			141,416
Impairment of long-lived assets		51,677			28,943
Loss on sale of assets and other		9,393			7,706

Total cost of operations		1,396,008			1,436,525
Operating income		118,440			175,579
Interest expense⁽⁴⁾		(162,131	)		(168,051	)
Other income (expense)		6,105			(4,556	)

Income (loss) before income taxes		(37,586	)		2,972
Income taxes⁽⁵⁾		2,176			6,520

Net loss	$	(39,762	)	$	(3,548	)


Basic and diluted net loss per share	$	(0.43	)	$	(0.04	)


⁽¹⁾		~~Amortization expense~~Includes approximately $485 of ~~$7,087 for~~vendor contracts recorded as a result of the ~~year ended December 31, 2007 included $6,783~~acquisition of ~~amortization for~~two theatres in Brazil during 2008. Includes approximately $1,034 of vendor contracts, $443 of net unfavorable leases and $892 of tradename recorded as a result of the Central America Share Exchange (see Note 10). Includes approximately $161 of net unfavorable leases and $313 of tradename recorded as a result of the Ecuador Share Exchange (see Note 10).

⁽²⁾		The additions to other intangible assets are a result of the acquisition of theatres in the U.S. as discussed in Note 6. The reduction in vendor contracts is a result of an adjustment to the preliminary purchase price allocation related to the acquisition of theatres in Brazil, which occurred during 2008.

⁽³⁾		Includes foreign currency translation adjustments, impairments and ~~$304~~write-offs for closed theatres. See Note 12 for summary of ~~amortization for other assets. Estimated aggregate future amortization expense for intangible assets is as follows:~~impairment charges.


For the year ended December 31, 2008	$	6,404
For the year ended December 31, 2009		5,287
For the year ended December 31, 2010		5,005
For the year ended December 31, 2011		4,551
For the year ended December 31, 2012		3,686
Thereafter		17,430

Total	$	42,363


	September 30,	January 28,
	2004	2005
	Grant	Grant
Expected life	6.5 years	6.5 years
Expected volatility⁽¹⁾	39%	44%
Risk-free interest rate	3.79%	3.93%
Dividend yield	0%	0%
Grant date fair value	$3.51	$3.80


				Weighted
				Average
				Grant Date
Nonvested Stock Options	Shares			Fair Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2007		3,146,298		$	3.51
Granted		—			—
Vested		(1,357,913	)	$	3.51
Forfeited		(112,416	)	$	3.51

Outstanding at December 31, 2007		1,675,969		$	3.51


⁽¹⁾		Includes amortization of debt issue costs.

⁽²⁾		Includes interest income, foreign currency exchange gain, dividend income and equity in loss of affiliates and excludes distributions from NCM. Distributions from NCM are reported entirely within the U.S. operating segment.


	Valuation Allowance
	for Deferred
	Tax Assets
Balance at January 1, 2005	$	7,383
Additions		2,232
Deductions		(2,680	)

Balance at December 31, 2005	$	6,935
Additions		4,225
Deductions		(2,298	)

Balance at December 31, 2006	$	8,862
Additions		2,370
Deductions		(1,360	)

Balance at December 31, 2007	$	9,872


	Valuation
	Allowance
	for Deferred
	Tax Assets
Balance at January 1, 2007	$	8,862
Additions		2,370
Deductions		(1,360	)

Balance at December 31, 2007	$	9,872
Additions		4,200
Deductions		(609	)

Balance at December 31, 2008	$	13,463
Additions		5,163
Deductions		(398	)

Balance at December 31, 2009	$	18,228


												2008
	2006											First		Second		Third		Fourth
	First Quarter		Second Quarter		Third Quarter⁽⁵⁾		Fourth Quarter^{(1) (2)}			Full Year		Quarter		Quarter		Quarter		Quarter ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾			Full Year ⁽³⁾

Revenues	$	245,989	$	295,105	$	287,995	$	391,505		$	1,220,594	$	401,016	$	457,234	$	476,223	$	407,814		$	1,742,287
Operating income	$	24,574	$	43,482	$	30,131	$	29,182		$	127,369
Net income (loss)	$	5,790	$	13,104	$	2,276	$	(20,329	)	$	841
Net income (loss) per share:
Operating income (loss)												$	34,082	$	52,889	$	52,678	$	(79,429	)	$	60,220
Net income (loss) attributable to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.												$	5,251	$	15,523	$	20,448	$	(89,547	)	$	(48,325	)
Net income (loss) per share attributable to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s common stockholders:
Basic	$	0.07	$	0.16	$	0.03	$	(0.22	)	$	0.01	$	0.05	$	0.14	$	0.19	$	(0.83	)	$	(0.45	)
Diluted	$	0.07	$	0.15	$	0.03	$	(0.22	)	$	0.01	$	0.05	$	0.14	$	0.19	$	(0.83	)	$	(0.45	)


⁽¹⁾		During the fourth quarter of ~~2006,~~2008, the Company ~~acquired Century Theatres, Inc.~~recorded impairment charges of $105,388. (See ~~Note 6).~~Notes 11 and 12.)

⁽²⁾		~~During~~Diluted loss per share calculations for the fourth quarter 2008 exclude common equivalent shares for stock options of ~~2006, the Company recorded goodwill impairment charges of $13,594 and recorded additional interest expense related to the senior secured credit facility.~~1,237 as they were anti-dilutive.

⁽³⁾		During the first quarter of 2007, the Company recorded a gain of $210,773 on the sale of a portion of its ownership in NCM (See Note 7) and recorded impairment charges of $49,730 (See Notes 10 and 11).

⁽⁴⁾		~~During the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company recorded impairment charges of $26,169 (See Notes 10 and 11).~~

⁽⁵⁾		Diluted ~~earnings~~loss per share calculations for the ~~third quarter 2006, the third quarter 2007 and fourth quarter 2007~~full year 2008 exclude common ~~share equivalents~~equivalent shares for stock options of ~~743, 2,220,~~1,971 and ~~2,382, respectively,~~common equivalent shares for restricted stock units of 47 as they were anti-dilutive.