Products Corporation is a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Revlon, Inc., which is an indirect majority-owned subsidiary of MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings Inc. (‘‘MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings’’ and, together with its affiliates, ‘‘MacAndrews & Forbes’’), a corporation wholly-owned by Ronald O. Perelman.

Overview of the Company’s Plan

The Company has acceleratedis in the implementation of its three-part plan to rationalize costs and to grow the business. In 2002, the Company began the implementation of the stabilization and growththird phase of its plan.plan, the Accelerated Growth Phase.

The Company intends to capitalize on the actions taken during the stabilization and growth phaseearlier phases of itsthe plan, with the objective of increasing revenues and achieving profitability over the long term. The Company currently anticipates thatAccelerated Growth Phase of the continued growth momentum and accelerated growth stage of its plan will includeincludes various actions that represent refinements of and additions to the actions taken during the stabilization and growth phaseearlier phases of itsthe plan, with the objective of balancing top-line growth with an improved operating margins and developing and implementing the Company's productivity initiatives.profit margin. These ongoing initiatives include, among other things, actions to: (i) further improve the new product development and introduction process;process with even deeper insights into the Company’s consumers and the categories in which it competes; (ii) continue to increase the effectiveness and reduce the cost of the Company's display walls;walls across categories and brands; (iii) drive efficiencies across the Company's overall supply chain, including reducing manufacturing costs by streamliningcontinuing to rationalize components and by sourcing strategically and rationalizing its supply chain in Europe, which will include moving certain production for the European markets to the Company's Oxford, North Carolina facility (the Company intends to transition such manufacturing primarily to one or more of its other facilities and does not currently expect any disruption in its supply chain) and entering into new warehousing and distribution arrangements in the U.K.; andstrategically; (iv) optimize the effectiveness of the Company'sCompany’s advertising, marketing and promotions. This stage will also include strengtheningpromotions; (v) continue the Company'straining and development of the organization so that the Company may continue to improve its capabilities to execute its strategies while providing enhanced job satisfaction for the Company’s employees; and (vi) continue to strengthen the Company’s balance sheet and capital structure, much of which as discussed in Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, has been accomplished during 2004.2004, with additional financing transactions completed during 2005 and planned for 2006. (See ‘‘Recent Developments’’ regarding Revlon, Inc.'s planned $110 million rights offering and planned $75 million equity issuance).

The Company believes that it has strengthened its organizational capabilitycapabilities and it intends to continue doing so. The Company also believes that it has strengthened its relationships with its key retailers in the U.S., which has led to space gains and increased distribution in 2004 for certain

Overview of Brand Initiatives

In August 2005, the Company announced two major brand initiatives. One initiative involves a complete relaunch of the Company's products.Almay brand and builds on Almay’s healthy beauty heritage and the desire among consumers for simplicity and personalization. The second initiative is focused on the more mature consumer and involves the launch of a complete line of cosmetics under a new brand name, Vital Radiance, that is designed to serve this affluent and growing consumer demographic currently underserved in the marketplace.

On July 9, 2004, Products Corporation entered intoThe brand initiatives had a positive effect on net sales of approximately $33 million in 2005, after giving effect to approximately $44 million of provisions for incremental returns and allowances associated with the 2004 Credit Agreementlaunch of these initiatives. As a result of these brand initiatives, the Company had accelerated amortization associated with certain existing retail display fixtures of approximately $7 million that impacted selling, general and during Julyadministrative expenses (‘‘SG&A’’) in 2005. The total upfront launch and August 2004 usedrelated costs of the proceedsbrand initiatives in 2005 was approximately $62 million, principally including provisions for the aforementioned incremental returns and allowances of borrowings underapproximately $44 million and the 2004 Credit Agreementaforementioned $7 million of accelerated amortization. The Company also currently expects that the first quarter of 2006 would benefit from the incremental initial shipments associated with the launch of these brand initiatives.

The Company continues to repay in full the $290.5 of outstanding indebtedness (including accrued interest) under Products Corporation's 2001 Credit Agreement, to purchase and redeem all $363 aggregate principal amount of Products Corporation's 12% Senior Secured Notes, and to pay fees and expenses incurredmake certain investments in connection with these brand initiatives, most notably in the 2004 Credit Agreement,area of permanent displays and inventory. In terms of the Tender Offercash flow impact of these brand initiatives, the Company’s investment in permanent displays, including displays for its existing businesses and these brand initiatives, was approximately $70 million for 2005 and the Revlon Exchange Transactions, includingCompany expects that its continued investment in permanent displays will be in the paymentrange of expenses related$85 million to a refinancing$95 million for 2006, returning to more normalized levels thereafter. The net increase in 2005 inventory levels of approximately $66 million and the increase in 2005 net trade receivables of approximately $82 million, as compared with that Products Corporation launched in Mayof 2004, but did not consummate. The balance of such proceeds in connection with the Term Loan Facility were available to Products Corporation for general corporate purposes.

On March 25, 2004 Revlon, Inc. consummated the Revlon Exchange Transactions and reduced Products Corporation's debt by approximately $804 as of that date. Revlon, Inc. issued an additional 299,969,493 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock and as of December 31, 2004 Revlon, Inc. had outstanding approximately 338,867,944 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock and 31,250,000 shares of Revlon Class B Common Stock. MacAndrews & Forbes beneficially owned approximately 221.4 million shares of the Revlon Common Stock (representing approximately 59.9% of the outstanding shares of the Revlon Common Stock and approximately 77.2% of the combined voting power of the Revlon Common Stock) as of December 31, 2004. (See Note 9is primarily due to the Consolidated Financial Statements).brand initiatives. The Company’s working capital is expected to return to more normalized levels in relation to sales during the second half of 2006.

Overview of Sales and Earnings Results

Net sales in 2004 decreased $2.12005 increased $35.1 million to $1,297.2,$1,332.3 million, as compared to $1,299.3with $1,297.2 million in 2003,2004, driven by higher shipments and favorable foreign currency translation, partially offset by higher total returns, allowances and discounts partially offset by favorable foreign currency translation and higher shipments,lower licensing revenue primarily as well asa result of the prepayment of certain minimum royalties and renewal fees by licensees.licensees in 2004.

In the United States and Canada, 20042005 net sales decreased $34.9increased $1.4 million to $857.1 million from $855.7 from $890.6million in 2003. The2004. Excluding the impact of Canadian currency fluctuations, net sales were down $3.2 million. This decrease in 2004 was primarily due to higher total returns, allowancesa decline in net sales of certain of the Company’s base business products and discounts which were due in part to a higher returns provision for product discontinuances identified in 2004, higher returns from promotions, and the fact that the 2003 provision for returns benefited from a revision of previous estimates for returns associated with the Company's accelerated growth plan which were recorded in 2002, partially offset by higher shipments and an increasedecrease in licensing revenue from 2004 levels which included the prepayments of certain minimum royalties and renewal fees by licensees, of $11.8partially offset by an increase in 2004 versus $5.3new product net sales due in 2003.part to the brand initiatives. In International, in 2004,2005 net sales increased $32.8$33.7 million to $475.2 million from $441.5 from $408.7million in 2003.2004. The increase in 20042005 was due primarily to higher shipments and favorable foreign currency translation.

Net loss in 2005 decreased $65.0 million to $77.8 million, as compared with $142.8 million in 2004. The improvement in net loss for 2005, as compared with 2004, reflected a decrease of approximately $82 million in expenses relating to the early extinguishment of debt, higher product shipments, due principally to the brand initiatives, and favorable foreign currency impact. These improvements were partially offset by the decrease in the aforementioned licensing revenues and the additional costs incurred relating to the launch of the brand initiatives, including a charge for incremental returns and allowances, plus additional costs incurred for advertising, which includes expenses incurred for promotional displays and accelerated depreciation on certain existing permanent displays.

Overview of Market Share Data

In terms of U.S. marketplace performance, the U.S. color cosmetics category for 2004 declined2005 increased approximately 2.5%3.2% versus 2003. For 2004,2004. Combined U.S. mass-market share for the Revlon and Almay brands combined held U.S. mass-markettotaled 21.6% for 2005, compared with 21.4% for 2004, with the Revlon brand registering a share of 21.5%,15.4% for 2005, compared with 22.3%15.7% for 2003. Market2004, and the Almay brand registering a share performance of existing products under6.2% for 2005, compared with 5.7% for 2004. The share increase for the Revlon and Almay brands increased from 2003 to 2004, offset in partbrand was driven primarily by decreased market share performancethe successful launch of new products, under such brands.including the Almay Intense i-Color collection. In women’s hair color and beauty tools, the Company gained market share in 2004,2005, compared with 2003,2004, increasing, respectively, from a 6.5%8.0% market share for 20032004 to 7.1%8.5% for 20042005, and 22.7%24.1% market share for 20032004 to 24.5%25.0% for 2004, while market2005. Market share performance was downessentially even at 6.2% for anti-perspirants/deodorants decreasing from 6.3% in 20032004 and 2005.

Overview of Financing Activities

The Accelerated Growth Phase of the Company’s plan include actions intended to, 6.1% in 2004.

Net sales in the Company's domestic and international operations in the normal course are subject to the risk of being adversely affected by, among other things, one or morestrengthen the Company's balance sheet and capital structure, much of which actions were accomplished during 2005 and 2004. (See ‘‘Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources — 2004 Refinancing Transactions’’ for a discussion of the following: weak economic conditions, category weakness, political uncertainties, military actions, terrorist activities, adverse currency fluctuations, competitive activities2004 financing transactions).

In March 2005, Products Corporation issued in a private placement $310.0 million aggregate principal amount of 9½% Senior Notes due 2011 (the ‘‘Original 9½% Senior Notes’’) and changes in consumer purchasing habits, including with respectused the proceeds to shopping channels.

Operating income inprepay and permanently reduce $100.0 million of indebtedness under the Term Loan Facility of Products Corporation’s 2004 increased $67.2Credit Agreement, to $89.7, as comparedredeem its 8 1/8% Senior Notes and 9% Senior Notes and to $22.5 in 2003. The improvement in 2004 reflectedpay the absence of growth plan charges (which decreased operating income in 2003 by approximately $31.2), the aforementioned higher licensing revenues (which included prepayments of minimum royalties and renewal fees by licensees of $11.8 in 2004 versus $5.3 in 2003) and lower advertising, partially offset by higher total returns, allowances and discounts and favorable foreign currency translation.

The $90.7 loss on early extinguishment of debt for 2004 represents the loss on the exchange of equity for certain indebtedness in the Revlon Exchange Transactions (such loss was equal to the difference between the fair value of the equity securities issued and the book value of the related indebtedness exchanged by third parties other than MacAndrews & Forbes or related parties) andapplicable redemption premiums, fees, expenses and the write-off of deferred financing costsaccrued interest related to these transactions. This issuance and the Revlon Exchange Transactions,related transactions extended the tender for and redemptionmaturities of Products Corporation's debt that would have otherwise been due in 2006. In June 2005, all of the 12%Original 9½% Senior Secured Notes (includingwere exchanged for new 9½% Senior Notes (the ‘‘March 2005 9½% Senior Notes’’), which have substantially identical terms to the applicable premium)Original 9½% Senior Notes, except that they are registered with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the ‘‘Securities Act’’), and the repayment oftransfer restrictions and registration rights applicable to the 2001 Credit Agreement.Original 9½% Senior Notes do not apply to the March 2005 9½% Senior Notes. (See further discussion in ‘‘2005 Refinancing Transactions’’ within this section and in Note 9, ‘‘Long-Term Debt’’, to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

In August 2005, Products Corporation issued in a private placement $80.0 million aggregate principal amount of additional 9½% Senior Notes due 2011 (the ‘‘Additional 9½% Senior Notes’’). The Company

used the proceeds of such issuance to help fund investments in its brand initiatives and for general corporate purposes, as well as to pay fees and expenses in connection with the issuance of the Additional 9½% Senior Notes. In December 2005, all of the Additional 9½% Senior Notes were exchanged for new 9½% Senior Notes (the ‘‘August 2005 9½% Senior Notes’’ and together with the March 2005 9½% Senior Notes, the ‘‘9½% Senior Notes’’), which have substantially identical terms to the Additional 9½% Senior Notes, except that they are registered with the SEC under the Securities Act, and the transfer restrictions and registration rights applicable to the Additional 9½% Senior Notes do not apply to the August 2005 9½% Senior Notes. (See further discussion in ‘‘2005 Refinancing Transactions’’ within this section and in Note 9 ‘‘Long-Term Debt’’ to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Also in August 2005, Revlon, Inc. announced its plan to issue $185.0 million of equity with the proceeds from approximately $110 million of this issuance to be contributed to Products Corporation to reduce its debt and the balance of the proceeds to be available to Products Corporation for general corporate purposes. (See ‘‘Recent Developments’’ and ‘‘2005 Refinancing Transactions’’ within this section for further discussion).

In December 2005, the SEC declared effective Revlon, Inc.’s ‘‘shelf’’ registration statement on Form S-3 registering up to $250.0 million of a variety of equity securities, including (a) Class A Common Stock, (b) preferred stock, (c) warrants to purchase Class A Common Stock or preferred stock, (d) stock purchase contracts (representing contracts obligating holders to purchase from Revlon, Inc. and Revlon, Inc. to sell to the holders, certain shares of Class A Common Stock or preferred stock at future dates), (e) stock purchase units (which consist of a stock purchase contract and/or warrants that would secure the holder’s obligation to purchase or sell Class A Common Stock or preferred stock), and (f) subscription rights to purchase Class A Common Stock or preferred stock. (See ‘‘Recent Developments’’).

Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies

In the ordinary course of its business, the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of results of operations and financial condition in the preparation of its financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates and assumptions. The Company believes that the following discussion addresses the Company's most critical accounting policies, which are those that are most important to the portrayal of the Company's financial condition and results and require management's most difficult, subjective and complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.

Sales Returns:

The Company allows customers to return their unsold products when they meet certain Company-establishedcompany-established criteria as outlined in the Company'sCompany’s trade terms. The Company regularly reviews and revises,

when deemed necessary, itsthe Company’s estimates of sales returns based primarily upon actual returns, planned product discontinuances, and promotional sales, which would permit customers to return items based upon the Company'sCompany’s trade terms. The Company records estimated sales returns as a reduction to sales and cost of sales, and an increase in accrued liabilities and inventories. Returned products which are recorded as inventories are valued based upon the amount that the Company expects to realize upon their subsequent disposition. The physical condition and marketability of the returned products are the major factors considered by the Company considers in estimating realizable value. Cost of sales includes the cost of refurbishment of returned products. Actual returns, as well as realized values on returned products, may differ significantly, either favorably or unfavorably, from the Company'sCompany’s estimates if factors such as product discontinuances, customer inventory levels or competitive conditions differ from the Company'sCompany’s estimates and expectations and, in the case of actual returns, if economic conditions differ significantly from the Company'sCompany’s estimates and expectations.

Trade Support Costs:

In order to support the retail trade, the Company has various performance-based arrangements with retailers to reimburse them for all or a portion of their promotional activities related to the Company's products. The Company regularly reviews and revises, when deemed necessary, estimates of costs to the

Company for these promotions based on estimates of what has been incurred by the retailers. Actual costs incurred by the Company may differ significantly if factors such as the level and success of the retailers' programs, as well as retailer participation levels, differ from the Company's estimates and expectations.

Inventories:

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is principally determined by the first-in, first-out method. The Company records adjustments to the value of inventory based upon its forecasted plans to sell its inventories, as well as planned discontinuances. The physical condition (e.g., age and quality) of the inventories is also considered in establishing its valuation. These adjustments are estimates, which could vary significantly, either favorably or unfavorably, from the amounts that the Company may ultimately realize upon the disposition of inventories if future economic conditions, customer inventory levels, product discontinuances, return levels or competitive conditions differ from the Company's estimates and expectations.

Property, Plant and Equipment and Other Assets:

Property, plant and equipment is recorded at cost and is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of such assets. Changes in circumstances such as technological advances, changes to the Company's business model, changes in the planned use of fixtures or software or closing of facilities or changes in the Company's capital strategy can result in the actual useful lives differing from the Company's estimates.

Included in other assets are permanent wall displays, which are recorded at cost and amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of such assets. Intangibles other than goodwill are recorded at cost and amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of such assets.

Long-lived assets, including fixed assets, permanent wall displays and intangibles other than goodwill, are reviewed by the Company for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of any such asset may not be recoverable. If the undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest) from the use and eventual disposition of the asset is less than the carrying value, the Company recognizes an impairment loss, measured as the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the asset. The estimate of undiscounted cash flow is based upon, among other things, certain assumptions about expected future operating performance. The Company's estimates of undiscounted cash flow may differ from actual cash flow due to, among other things, technological changes, economic conditions, changes to its business model or changes in its operating performance. In those cases where the Company determines that the useful life of other long-lived assets should be shortened, the Company would depreciate the net book value in excess of the salvage value (after testing for impairment as described above), over the revised remaining useful life of such asset thereby increasing amortization

expense. Additionally, goodwill is reviewed for impairment at least annually. The Company recognizes an impairment loss to the extent that carrying value exceeds the fair value of the asset.

Pension Benefits:

The Company sponsors both funded and unfunded pension and other retirement plans in various forms covering substantially all employees who meet the applicable eligibility requirements. SeveralThe Company uses several statistical and other factors whichin an attempt to estimate future events are used in calculating the expenseliability and liabilityexpense related to the plans. These factors include assumptions about the discount rate, expected return on plan assets and rate of future compensation increases as determined annually by the Company, within certain guidelines.guidelines, which assumptions would be subject to revisions if significant events occur during the year. The Company uses September 30 as its measurement date for plan obligations and assets.

The Company selected a discount rate of 5.5% in 2005, a decline from the 5.75% rate selected in 2004 for the Company’s U.S. pension plans. The average discount rate selected for the Company’s international plans also declined from 5.5% for 2004 to 5% for 2005. The discount rates are used to measure the benefit obligations at the measurement date and the net periodic benefit cost for the subsequent calendar year and are reset annually using data available at the measurement date. The changes in the discount rates used for 2005 were primarily due to declining long-term interest rates. At September 30, 2005, the decrease in the discount rates had the effect of increasing the Company’s projected pension benefit

obligation by approximately $19 million. For fiscal 2006, the Company expects that decreases in the discount rates will have the effect of increasing the net periodic benefit cost for its U.S. and international plans by approximately $1.5 million.

The expected rate of return on the pension plan assets used in 2005 and 2004 remained unchanged at 8.5% for the Company’s U.S. pension plans. The average expected rate of return used for the Company’s international plans declined from 7% in 2004 to 6.7% in 2005, primarily due to a change in the portfolios’ asset allocations.

The table below reflects the Company’s estimates of the possible effects of changes in the discount rates and expected rates of return on its 2006 net periodic benefit costs and its projected benefit obligation at September 30, 2005 for the Company’s principal plans:

				25 basis points increase								25 basis points decrease
				Net periodic benefit costs				Projected pension benefit obligation				Net periodic benefit costs				Projected pension benefit obligation
Discount rate				$	(1.5	)		$	(19.4	)		$	1.7			$	20.2
Expected rate of return					(1.0	)			—				1.0				—

The rate of future compensation increases is another assumption used by the Company’s third party actuarial consultants for pension accounting. The rate of future compensation increases used in 2005 and in 2004 remained unchanged at 4% for the U.S. pension plans In addition, the Company's actuarial consultants also use subjectiveother factors such as withdrawal and mortality rates to estimate these factors.rates. The actuarial assumptions used by the Company may differ materially from actual results due to changing market and economic conditions, higher or lower withdrawal rates or longer or shorter life spans of participants, among other things. Differences from these assumptions may result in a significantcould significantly impact to the actual amount of pension expense/net periodic benefit cost and liability recorded by the Company.

Results of Operations

Year Endedended December 31, 20042005 compared with the year ended December 31, 20032004

In the tables, numbers are in millions and amounts in parenthesis ( ) denote unfavorable variances.

Net sales:

Net sales in 2005 increased $35.1 million, or 2.7%, to $1,332.3 million, as compared with $1,297.2 million in 2004, driven by higher shipments and favorable foreign currency translation, partially offset by higher total returns, allowances and discounts. Excluding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, consolidated 2005 net sales increased 1.8%. The 2004 year benefited from the prepayment of certain minimum royalties and renewal fees by licensees.

				Year Ended December 31,								Dollar Change				Percent Change
				2004				2003
United States and Canada				$	855.7			$	890.6			$	(34.9	)			−3.9	%
International					441.5				408.7				32.8	(1)			8.0	%
				$	1,297.2			$	1,299.3			$	(2.1)	(2)			−0.2	%

				Year Ended December 31,								Change
				2005				2004				$				%
United States and Canada.				$	857.1			$	855.7			$	1.4				0.2	%(1)
International.					475.2				441.5				33.7				7.6	(2)
				$	1,332.3			$	1,297.2			$	35.1				2.7	%(3)

(1)	Excluding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, U.S. and Canada net sales decreased 0.4%.

(2)	Excluding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, International net sales increased 6.0%.

(3)	Excluding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, consolidated net sales increased 1.8%.

United States and Canada.

In the United States and Canada, net sales increased $1.4 million, or 0.2%, to $857.1 million in 2005 from $855.7 million in 2004. Excluding the impact of Canadian currency fluctuations, 2005 net sales were down $3.2 million, or 0.4%, compared with 2004. This decrease was primarily due to a decline in shipments

of certain base business products and a decrease of approximately $12 million in licensing revenue from 2004 levels, which included the prepayments of certain minimum royalties and renewal fees by licensees, partially offset by an increase in shipments of new products and the brand initiatives, net of a provision for incremental returns and allowances of approximately $44 million associated with the launch of the brand initiatives.

International.

Net sales in the Company's international operations increased $33.7 million, or 7.6%, to $475.2 million in 2005 from $441.5 million in 2004. Excluding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, international net sales increased by $26.4 million, or 6.0%, in 2005, as compared with 2004.

In Asia Pacific and Africa, net sales increased by $16.4 million, or 7.3%, to $242.6 million in 2005, as compared with $226.2 million in 2004. Excluding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, net sales in Asia Pacific and Africa increased $13.5 million, or 6.0%, in 2005, as compared with 2004. This increase in 2005 net sales, excluding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, was driven by higher net sales in each of the Company’s major markets in the region. Excluding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, the Company estimates that South Africa, Australia, Japan and certain distributor markets contributed approximately 4.8% of the increase in net sales for the region in 2005, as compared with 2004.

In Europe, which is comprised of Europe and the Middle East, net sales increased by $4.4 million, or 3.6%, to $125.0 million in 2005, as compared with $120.6 million in 2004. Excluding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, net sales in Europe increased by $5.2 million, or 4.3%, in 2005, as compared with 2004. The increase in net sales, excluding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, was due to higher net sales in the U.K. and certain distributor markets (which the Company estimates contributed to an approximate 5.0% increase in net sales for the region in 2005, as compared with 2004), and was partially offset by a decrease in net sales primarily in Italy (which the Company estimates contributed to an approximate 0.6% reduction in net sales for the region in 2005, as compared with 2004).

In Latin America, which is comprised of Mexico, Central America and South America, net sales increased by $12.9 million, or 13.6%, to $107.6 million in 2005, as compared with $94.7 million in 2004. Excluding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, net sales in Latin America increased by $8.9 million, or 9.5%, in 2005, as compared with 2004. The increase in net sales, excluding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, was driven primarily by increased shipments in Brazil, Mexico and certain distributor markets (which the Company estimates contributed to an approximate 9.1% increase in net sales for the region in 2005, as compared with 2004), which was partially offset by lower net sales in Argentina and Chile (which the Company estimates contributed to an approximate 0.5% reduction in net sales for the region in 2005, as compared with 2004).

Gross profit:

				Year Ended December 31
				2005				2004				Change
Gross profit.				$	824.2			$	811.9			$	12.3

Gross profit increased by $12.3 million in 2005 from 2004 primarily due favorable foreign currency translation of $6.4 million and to higher shipments of products, which were partially offset by the aforementioned lower licensing revenues, higher cost of goods due to increased shipments and higher consolidated returns, allowances and discounts, which included approximately $44 million of provision for incremental returns and allowances associated with the launch of the brand initiatives. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales decreased to 61.9% in 2005 from 62.6% in 2004 primarily due to the aforementioned increase in consolidated returns, allowances and discounts and the aforementioned lower licensing revenue.

SG&A expenses:

				Year Ended December 31
				2005				2004				Change
SG&A expenses				$	750.2			$	716.4			$	(33.8	)

Excluding unfavorable foreign currency fluctuations of $5.6 million, SG&A increased $28.2 million, or 4.8%, to $750.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, primarily due to $17.5 million in expenditures related to the launch of the Company’s two brand initiatives, inclusive of the aforementioned accelerated amortization of permanent displays. The increase in SG&A expenses was also due to $4.2 million in higher distribution costs, higher brand support of $4.0 million and higher display amortization expenses related to the base business of $2.7 million, in each case in 2005, as compared with 2004, partially offset by reimbursements from Revlon, Inc. for expenses directly related to being a public holding company.

Restructuring costs:

				Year Ended December 31
				2005				2004				Change
Restructuring costs and other, net				$	1.5			$	5.8			$	4.3

The Company recorded $1.5 million and $5.8 million in restructuring for employee severance and other related personnel benefits in 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Other expenses:

				Year Ended December 31
				2005				2004				Change
Interest expenses				$	130.0			$	130.8			$	0.8

The decrease in interest expense of $0.8 million for 2005, as compared with 2004, is primarily due to a slightly lower weighted average interest rate during the first three quarters of 2005, offset in part by higher debt balances during the fourth quarter of 2005 attributable primarily to working capital build to help fund the Company’s brand initiatives, as well as higher weighted average interest rates during the fourth quarter of 2005.

				Year Ended December 31
				2005				2004				Change
Loss on early extinguishment of debt				$	9.0			$	90.7			$	81.7

The $9.0 million loss on early extinguishment of debt for 2005 includes the $5.0 million prepayment fee related to the prepayment in March 2005 of $100.0 million of indebtedness outstanding under the Term Loan Facility of the 2004 Credit Agreement with a portion of the proceeds from the issuance of the Original 9½% Senior Notes, the aggregate $1.5 million loss on the redemption of Products Corporation’s 8 1/8% Senior Notes and 9% Senior Notes in April 2005, as well as the write-off of the portion of deferred financing costs related to such prepaid amount. The loss on early extinguishment of debt for 2004 represents the loss on the exchange of equity for certain indebtedness in the Revlon Exchange Transactions and fees, expenses and the write-off of deferred financing costs related to the Revlon Exchange Transactions, the tender for and redemption of Products Corporation’s 12% Senior Secured Notes (including the applicable premium) and the repayment of Products Corporation’s credit agreement dated November 30, 2001, which was scheduled to mature on May 30, 2005 (as amended, the ‘‘2001 Credit Agreement’’). (See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

				Year Ended December 31
				2005				2004				Change
Miscellaneous, net				$	(0.5	)		$	2.0			$	2.5

The decrease in miscellaneous, net for 2005, as compared with 2004, is primarily due to fees and expenses associated with the refinancing that Products Corporation launched in May 2004 but did not consummate.

Provision for income taxes:

				Year Ended December 31
				2005				2004				Change
Provision for income taxes				$	8.3			$	9.1			$	0.8

The decrease in the provision for income taxes in 2005, as compared with 2004, was primarily attributable to the favorable resolution of various tax matters resulting in a tax benefit of approximately $3.8 million in 2005, compared to that of approximately $2.9 million in 2004. The decrease in the provision for income taxes was partially offset by the tax on cash repatriation dividends from a foreign subsidiary.

Year Ended December 31, 2004 compared with the year ended December 31, 2003

In the tables, numbers are in millions and amounts in parenthesis ( ) denote unfavorable variances.

Net sales:

Net sales in 2004 declined $2.1 million, or 0.2%, to $1,297.2 million, as compared with $1,299.3 million in 2003, driven by higher consolidated returns, allowances and discounts, due in part to higher returns provision for product discontinuances identified in 2004 and higher returns from promotions, partially offset by higher shipments and favorable foreign currency translation.

				Year Ended December 31,								Change
				2004				2003				$				%
United States and Canada				$	855.7			$	890.6			$	(34.9	)			(3.9	)%
International					441.5				408.7				32.8				8.0	(1)
				$	1,297.2			$	1,299.3			$	(2.1	)			(0.2	)%(2)

(1)	Excluding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, International net sales increased 1.0%.

(2)	Excluding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, consolidated net sales decreased 2.7%.

United States and Canada.

Net sales in the U.S. and Canada decreased $34.9 million, or 4%, in 2004, as compared with 2003, due to higher total returns, allowances and discounts of approximately $51.0 million, partially offset by higher shipments of approximately $3.3 million, the favorable impact of foreign currency translation of $5.9 million and increased licensing revenue of $6.9 million, primarily from the prepayments of minimum royalties and renewal fees by licensees of $11.8 million in 2004 versus $5.3 million in 2003. The increase in returns, allowances and discounts in 2004 versus 2003 is due in part to higher returns provision for product discontinuances identified in 2004, higher returns from promotions, and the fact that the 2003 provision for returns benefited from a revision of previous estimates for returns associated with the Company's accelerated growthStabilization and Growth Phase of its plan recorded in 2002.

In terms of U.S. marketplace performance, the U.S. color cosmetics category for 2004 declined by approximately 2.5%0.6% versus 2003. For 2004, the Revlon and Almay brands combined held U.S. mass-market share of 21.5%21.4%, compared with 22.3%22.2% for 2003. Market share performance of existing products under the Revlon and Almay brands increased from 2003 to 2004, offset in part by decreased market share performance of new products under such brands. In women’s hair color and beauty tools, the Company gained market share in 2004, compared with 2003, increasing, respectively, from a 6.5%7.3% market share for 2003 to 7.1%8.0% for 2004 and 22.7%a 22.2% market share for 2003 to 24.5%24.1% for 2004, while market share was down for anti-perspirants/deodorants, decreasing from 6.3%6.4% in 2003 to 6.1%6.2% in 2004.

International.

Net sales in the Company's international operations increased $32.8 million, or 8.0%, in 2004, as compared with 2003. Excluding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, international net sales increased by 1.0% in 2004, as compared towith 2003.

In Europe, which is comprised of Europe and the Middle East, net sales decreased by $3.7 million, or 3.0%, to $120.6 million for 2004, as compared with 2003. Excluding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, net sales decreased by $15.1 million, or 12.2%, in 2004, as compared with 2003. The decline in net sales, excluding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, was due to lower sales in the U.K., in part due to reduced customer inventory levels and higher allowances granted to customers (which the Company estimates contributed to an approximate 9.4% reduction in net sales in 2004 for the region, as compared with 2003) and lower sales to distributors in Russia and Germany (which the Company estimates contributed to an approximate 4.3% reduction in net sales in 2004 for the region, as compared with 2003), partially offset by increased sales in Israel (which the Company estimates contributed to an approximate 1.3% increase in net sales in 2004 for the region, as compared with 2003).

OnIn September 22, 2004, the Company exercised its contractual rights to terminate its 2002 supply agreement with COSi that is currently scheduled to becomebecame effective on June 30, 2005.January 31, 2006. The Company intends to transitionhas transitioned such manufacturing primarily to its Oxford, North Carolina facility and distribution and warehousing to a local U.K.-based third party and does not currently expect any disruption in its supply chain.party. During 2004, COSi earned approximately $1.9 million in performance-based payments. In December 2004, the Company and COSi entered into a transitional agreement covering the period through termination pursuant to which, among other things, COSi is eligible to receivereceived $1.9 million in additional performance-based payments if they maintainby maintaining specific production service level objectives under the agreement (however, the Company expects thatobjectives. However, such payments if any, will bewere fully set off against payments that will become due to the Company from COSi in connection with the cessation of such arrangement).arrangement.

In Latin America, which is comprised of Mexico, Central America and South America, net sales increased by $2.5 million, or 2.8%, to $94.7 million for 2004, as compared with 2003. Excluding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, net sales increased by $4.8 million, or 5.2%, in 2004, as compared with 2003. The increase in net sales, excluding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, was primarily due to increased net sales in Brazil, Venezuela and certain distributor markets due to improved local economic and business conditions (which the Company estimates contributed to an approximate 11.5% increase in net sales for the region in 2004, as compared with 2003) due to improved local economic and business conditions,, partially offset by lower sales in Mexico (which the Company estimates contributed to an approximate 5.2% reduction in net sales in 2004 for the region, as compared with 2003).

In the Far EastAsia Pacific and Africa, net sales increased by $34.0 million, or 17.7%, to $226.2 million for 2004, as compared with 2003. Excluding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, net sales increased $14.4 million, or 7.5%, for 2004, as compared with 2003. This increase was driven by higher sales in South Africa and Japan related to favorable economic conditions (which the Company estimates contributed to an approximate 6.0% increase in net sales in 2004 for the region, as compared with 2003).

Gross profit:

				Year Ended December 31,								Dollar Change
				2004				2003
Gross profit				$	811.9			$	798.2			$	13.7

				Year Ended December 31
				2004				2003				Change
Gross profit.				$	811.9			$	798.2			$	13.7

Excluding foreign exchange fluctuations, gross profit for 2004 decreased $6.3 million, as compared towith 2003, reflecting higher total returns, allowances and discounts, partially offset by higher volumes,shipments of products, the aforementioned increase in licensing revenue and lower cost of goods sold. Gross profit as a percent of sales, excluding the impact of foreign exchange,currency fluctuations, increased to 62.6% in 2004 from 61.4% in 2003, primarily due to cost savings and the aforementioned higher licensing revenues, partially offset by higher total returns, allowances and discounts.

SG&A expenses:

				Year Ended December 31,								Dollar Change
				2004				2003
SG&A expenses				$	716.4			$	769.7			$	53.3

				Year Ended December 31
				2004				2003				Change
SG&A expenses				$	716.4			$	769.7			$	53.3

SG&A expenses decreased $53.3 million, or 6.9%, to $716.4 million for 2004, as compared towith 2003, due primarily to $36.7 million of lower marketing spending and the absence of fees and expenses related to the stabilizationStabilization and

growth phase Growth Phase of the Company's plan in 2004 versus $26.1 million of plan-related expenses in 2003, partially offset by $14.9 million of unfavorable foreign exchangecurrency fluctuations.

Restructuring costs:

				Year Ended December 31,								Dollar Change
				2004				2003
Restructuring costs and other, net				$	5.8			$	6.0			$	0.2

				Year Ended December 31
				2004				2003				Change
Restructuring costs and other, net				$	5.8			$	6.0			$	0.2

The Company recorded $5.8 in 2004million and $6.0 in 2003million for employee severance and other personnel benefits. The Company expects to save $3.8 annually as a result of the charges takenbenefits in 2004.2004 and 2003, respectively.

Other expenses (income):expenses:

				Year Ended December 31,								Dollar Change
				2004				2003
Interest expense				$	130.8			$	174.5			$	43.7

				Year Ended December 31
				2004				2003				Change
Interest expenses				$	130.8			$	174.5			$	43.7

The decrease in interest expense of $43.7 million for 2004, as compared towith 2003, is primarily due to lower consolidated debt during 2004, resulting from the Revlon Exchange Transactions, partially offset by higher borrowings under the 2004 Credit Agreement to repay the 2001 Credit Agreement, the tender for and redeemredemption of the 12% Senior Secured Notes (including the applicable premium and accrued interest) and to pay related fees and expenses. (See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

				Year Ended December 31,								Dollar Change
				2004				2003
Loss on early extinguishment of debt				$	90.7			$	-			$	(90.7	)

				Year Ended December 31
				2004				2003				Change
Loss on early extinguishment of debt				$	90.7			$	—			$	(90.7	)

The loss on early extinguishment of debt in 2004 represents the loss on the exchange of equity for certain indebtedness in the Revlon Exchange Transactions (such loss was equal to the difference between the fair value of the equity securities issued in the Revlon Exchange Transactions and the book value of the related indebtedness exchanged by third parties other than MacAndrews & Forbes or related parties) and fees, expenses and the write-off of deferred financing costs related to the Revlon Exchange Transactions, the tender for and redemption of the 12% Senior Secured Notes (including the applicable premium) and the repayment of the 2001 Credit Agreement. (See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

				Year Ended December 31,								Dollar Change
				2004				2003
Miscellaneous, net				$	2.0			$	0.5			$	(1.5	)

				Year Ended December 31
				2004				2003				Change
Miscellaneous, net				$	2.0			$	0.5			$	(1.5	)

The increase in miscellaneous, net for 2004, as compared to the comparablewith 2003, period, is primarily due to fees and expenses associated with the refinancing that Products Corporation launched in May 2004, but did not consummate.

Provision for income taxes:

				Year Ended December 31,								Dollar Change
				2004				2003
Provision for income taxes				$	9.1			$	0.3			$	(8.8	)

				Year Ended December 31
				2004				2003				Change
Provision for income taxes				$	9.1			$	0.3			$	(8.8	)

The increase in the provision for income taxes in 2004, as compared with 2003, is due to higher taxable income in certain markets outside the U.S. in the 2004 period.2004. Additionally, the 2004 and 2003 periods benefited by approximately $2.9 million and $7.0 million, respectively, from the favorable resolution of various tax audits.

Year ended December 31, 2003 compared with year ended December 31, 2002

In the tables, numbers in parenthesis ( ), denote unfavorable variances.

Net sales:

				Year Ended December 31,								Dollar Change				Percent Change
				2003				2002
United States and Canada				$	890.6			$	760.1			$	130.5				17.2	%
International					408.7				359.3				49.4	(1)			13.7	%
				$	1,299.3			$	1,119.4			$	179.9	(2)			16.1	%

	(1) Excluding the impact of currency fluctuations, International net sales increased 4.6%.

(2)	Excluding the impact of currency fluctuations, consolidated net sales increased 12.6%.

United States and Canada.

The increase in net sales in the U.S. and Canada in 2003 was primarily driven by (1) lower net charges for sales returns, allowances and discounts of $137.6 in the 2003 period since 2002 included significant amounts of returns due to the growth plan; and to revised estimates of returns based on favorable experience in 2003 versus 2002 returns estimates; and (2) foreign currency translations benefits, partially offset by lower licensing revenues of $8.6 in 2003. Market share in the U.S. mass market for color cosmetics for Almay and Revlon combined increased by 0.3% for the full year 2003 compared with 2002. These sales and market share gains were achieved in the context of a weaker than expected U.S. mass market color cosmetics category which, as measured by ACNielsen, declined by 1.9% during 2003.

International.

In Europe, which is comprised of Europe and the Middle East, net sales increased by $16.5, or 15.3%, to $124.3 for 2003, as compared with 2002. The increase in the European region was primarily due to the impact of favorable currency fluctuations (which factor the Company estimates contributed to an approximate 12.2% increase in net sales for the region) and increased sales volume and lower sales returns in the U.K. and France (which factor the Company estimates contributed to an approximate 6.7% increase in net sales for the region). Such factors were partially offset by lower sales volume in certain distributor markets in Russia and Germany, where the Company's distributors experienced financial problems (which factor the Company estimates contributed to an approximate 3.5% reduction in net sales for the region).

In Latin America, which is comprised of Mexico, Central America and South America, net sales decreased by $1.9, or 2.0%, to $92.2 for 2003, as compared with 2002. The decrease in the Latin American region was primarily due to decreased sales volume in Brazil and Mexico, where sales were impacted by local adverse economic conditions, a decline in the mass retail category and a reduction of customer inventory levels (which factors the Company estimates contributed to an approximate 10.0% reduction in net sales for the region) and the impact of adverse currency fluctuations (which factor the Company estimates contributed to an approximate 9.4% reduction in net sales for the region), which was partially offset by increased sales volume in Venezuela, Argentina and certain distributor markets (which factor the Company estimates contributed to an approximate 17.0% increase in net sales for the region).

In the Far East and Africa, net sales increased by $34.8, or 22.1%, to $192.2 for 2003, as compared with 2002. The increase in the Far East and Africa region was primarily due to the impact of favorable currency fluctuations (which factor the Company estimates contributed to an approximate 18.0% increase in net sales for the region) and increased sales volume in South Africa, Japan and China, where the Company's products experienced strong demand as a result of favorable general economic conditions and the effect of strong brand marketing activities (which factors the Company estimates contributed to an approximate 4.0% increase in net sales for the region), which the Company believes were partially offset by the economic impact of the SARS outbreak in China.

During 2002, the Company experienced production difficulties with COSi, its principal third party manufacturer for Europe and certain other international markets, which operates the Maesteg facility. To

rectify this situation, on October 31, 2002 Products Corporation and such manufacturer terminated the long-term supply agreement and entered into a new, more flexible agreement which had significantly reduced volume commitments and, among other things, Products Corporation loaned COSi approximately $2.0 and COSi was eligible to earn performance-based payments of approximately $6.3 over a 4-year period contingent upon the supplier achieving specific production service level objectives. During 2003 and 2002, COSi earned approximately $1.8 and $1.6, respectively, in performance-based payments.

Gross profit:

				Year Ended December 31,								Dollar Change
				2003				2002
Gross profit				$	798.2			$	615.7			$	182.5

The $182.5 increase in gross profit for 2003, as compared to the comparable 2002 period, is primarily due to lower sales returns, allowances and discounts of $144.5 in the 2003 period (which includes the impact of the stabilization and growth phase of the Company's plan, which began in December 2002) and higher sales volume of $43.8 (which includes the favorable impact of currency fluctuations). Such increases in 2003 were partially offset by unfavorable product mix in 2003 and a decrease in licensing and other revenue of $8.4 in 2003. Gross margins in 2003 improved to 61.4% versus 55.0% in 2002 due to the previously discussed lower sales returns, allowances and discounts.

SG&A expenses:

				Year Ended December 31,								Dollar Change
				2003				2002
SG&A expenses				$	769.7			$	711.1			$	(58.6	)

The increase in SG&A expenses for 2003, as compared to 2002, was primarily due to higher brand support of $38.7 principally related to the stabilization and growth phase of the Company's plan, higher personnel-related expenses and professional fees of $19.2 (including expenses related to the stabilization and growth phase of the Company's plan) and rent expense of $2.7, partially offset by lower depreciation and amortization of $8.9 in the 2003 period due to accelerated amortization of wall displays in 2002 as the Company transitioned to its new wall displays as part of the stabilization and growth phase of its plan.

Restructuring costs:

				Year Ended December 31,								Dollar Change
				2003				2002
Restructuring costs				$	6.0			$	13.6			$	7.6

During 2003, the Company recorded a separate charge of $5.9, for employee severance and other personnel benefits in certain International operations.

During the third quarter of 2000, the Company initiated a new restructuring program in line with the original restructuring plan developed in late 1998, designed to improve profitability by reducing personnel and consolidating manufacturing facilities. The 2000 restructuring program focused on the Company's plans to close its manufacturing operations in Phoenix, Arizona and Mississauga, Canada and to consolidate its cosmetics production into its plant in Oxford, North Carolina. The 2000 restructuring program also includes the remaining obligation for excess leased real estate in the Company's headquarters, consolidation costs associated with the Company closing its facility in New Zealand, and the elimination of several domestic and international executive and operational positions, each of which were effected to reduce and streamline corporate overhead costs. During 2003 and 2002, the Company continued to implement the 2000 restructuring program, and recorded charges of $0.1 and $13.6, respectively, principally for additional employee severance and other personnel benefits, primarily resulting from reductions in the Company's worldwide sales force, relocation and other costs related to the consolidation of the Company's worldwide operations.

The Company anticipates annualized savings of approximately $12 to $14 relating to the restructuring charges recorded during 2003.

Other expenses (income):

				Year Ended December 31,								Dollar Change
				2003				2002
Interest expense				$	174.5			$	159.0			$	(15.5	)

The increase in interest expense for 2003, as compared to 2002, was primarily due to higher overall borrowings during 2003, including amounts borrowed under the 2001 Credit Agreement (as hereinafter defined) and the 2003 MacAndrews & Forbes Loans (as hereinafter defined) and higher interest rates under the 2001 Credit Agreement as a result of the amendment to the 2001 Credit Agreement in February 2003. (See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Provision for income taxes:

				Year Ended December 31,								Dollar Change
				2003				2002
Provision for income taxes				$	0.3			$	4.6			$	4.3

The reduction in the provision for income taxes in 2003 was primarily attributable to the resolution of various tax audits, which reduced tax expense by approximately $7.0, partially offset by higher taxable income in certain markets outside the United States.

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

Net cash used for operating activities was $139.7 million, $94.2 million and $166.4 million for 2005, 2004 and $112.32003, respectively. This increase in cash used in 2005 versus 2004 resulted primarily from increased purchases of permanent displays and an increase in inventory and accounts receivables, partially offset by an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses, in each case due principally to the brand initiatives. The improvement in net cash used for operating activities for 2004 2003 and 2002, respectively. This improvement in cash flows in 2004 versus 2003

resulted primarily from higher operating income, lower purchases of permanent displays, lower accrued expenses and lower cash spending in connection with the stabilizationStabilization and growth phaseGrowth Phase of the Company's plan and lower interest payments. The increase in net cash used for operating activities for 2003, compared to 2002, resulted primarily from a decrease in accrued liabilities mainly associated with the implementation of the various aspects of the stabilization and growth phase of the Company's plan and higher spending on displays due to the roll out of the Company's reconfigured permanent wall displays, partially offset by lower net loss and lower accounts receivable due to earlier payment terms with many of the Company's large U.S. customers. The Company received nil, $11.8 million and $5.3 million in 2005, 2004 and $11.5 in 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively, related to prepaid minimum royalties and renewal fees under a licensing agreements.

Net cash used for investing activities was $15.8 million, $18.9 million and $23.3 million for 2005, 2004 and $14.2 for 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. Net cash used for investing activities for 2005, 2004 primarily consisted of capital expenditures. Net cash used for investing activities forand 2003 primarily consisted of capital expenditures, partially offset in 2003 by the proceeds from the sale of the Company's warehouse in Canada. Net cash used for investing activities for 2002 primarily consisted of capital expenditures.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $67.5 million, $174.5 million and $151.1 million for 2005, 2004 and $110.32003, respectively. Net cash provided by financing activities for 2005 included proceeds of $386.2 million from the issuance of the 9½% Senior Notes, which was used to (i) prepay $100.0 million of indebtedness under the Term Loan Facility of Products Corporation’s 2004 2003Credit Agreement, along with the $5.0 million prepayment fee plus accrued interest, (ii) redeem $116.2 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of Products Corporation’s 8 1/8% Senior Notes, plus the payment of accrued interest, (iii) redeem $75.5 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of Products Corporation’s 9% Senior Notes, plus accrued interest and 2002, respectively.the applicable premium, and (iv) pay financing costs related to such transactions, with the balance being used to help fund the Company’s brand initiatives. Net cash provided by financing activities for 2004 included cash drawn under each of the 2001 Credit Agreement, the a $125 million term loan from MacAndrews & Forbes (the ‘‘2004 $125 million MacAndrews & Forbes Loan (as hereinafter defined),Loan’’) and the Term Loan Facility under the 2004 Credit Agreement, partially offset by a) the repayment of borrowings under the 2001 Credit Agreement (in connection with the refinancing thereof), b) the repayment of borrowings under the 2004 $125 million MacAndrews & Forbes Loan, c) the payment of the redemption price, the applicable premium and interest in connection with the tender for and redemption of Products Corporation'sCorporation’s 12% Senior Secured Notes due 2005 (the "12% Senior Secured Notes") and d) the payment of financing costs in connection with certain amendments to the 2001 Credit Agreement during 2004, the Revlon Exchange Transactions, the 2004 Credit Agreement and the tender for and redemption of the 12% Senior Secured Notes. Net cash provided by financing activities for 2003 included cash drawn under the 2001 Credit Agreement and the 2003under a $65 million line of credit and a $100.0 million term loan from MacAndrews & Forbes Loans (as hereinafter defined) and net proceeds from thea $50.0 million rights offering conducted by Revlon, Inc. in 2003, Rights Offering (as hereinafter defined), partially offset by the repayment of borrowings under the 2001 Credit Agreement and payment of financing costs. Net cash provided by financing activities for 2002 included cash drawn under the 2001 Credit Agreement, partially offset by the repayment of borrowings under the 2001 Credit Agreement and payment of financing costs.

At December 31, 2004,February 1, 2006, Products Corporation had a liquidity position, of approximately $379,$255 million, consisting of (i) cash, and cash equivalents as well asand marketable securities (net of any outstanding checks), (ii) approximately $144 million of available borrowings from the Multi-Currency Facility (as hereinafter defined) under the 2004 Credit Agreement and (iii) approximately $87 million of available borrowings under the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit. (See ‘‘Recent Developments’’).

2004 Credit Agreement

OnIn July 9, 2004, Products Corporation entered into a new credit agreement (the "2004‘‘2004 Credit Agreement"Agreement’’) with certain of its subsidiaries as local borrowing subsidiaries, a syndicate of lenders, and Citicorp USA, Inc., as multi-currency administrative agent, term loan administrative agent and collateral agent.

The 2004 Credit Agreement providesoriginally provided up to $960.0 million and, consistsbefore giving effect to the $100.0 million prepayment in March 2005, consisted of ana term loan facility of $800.0 million (prior to being reduced to $700.0 million following the Company’s March 2005 prepayment of $100.0 million) (the ‘‘Term Loan Facility (the "Term Loan Facility"Facility’’) and a $160.0 asset-basedmillion multi-currency facility, (the "Multi-Currency Facility"), the availability under which varies based upon the borrowing base that is determined relative tobased upon the value of eligible accounts receivable, eligible inventory and eligible real property and equipment in the U.S. and the U.K. from time to time.time (the ‘‘Multi-Currency Facility’’). Products Corporation may request the Multi-Currency Facility to be increased from time to time in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $50.0 million subject to certain exceptions and subject to the lenders'lenders’ agreement. The Multi-Currency Facility is available to: (i) Products Corporation in revolving credit loans denominated in U.S. dollars, (ii) Products Corporation in swing line

loans denominated in U.S. dollars up to $25.0 million, (iii) Products Corporation in standby and commercial letters of credit denominated in U.S. dollars and other currencies up to $50.0 million and (iv) Products Corporation and certain of its international subsidiaries designated from time to time in revolving credit loans and bankers'bankers’ acceptances denominated in U.S. dollars and other currencies, in each case subject to borrowing base availability. If the value of the eligible assets is not sufficient to support the $160.0 million borrowing base under the Multi-Currency Facility, Products Corporation will not have full access to the Multi-Currency Facility. Products Corporation'sCorporation’s ability to make borrowings under the Multi-Currency Facility is also conditioned upon the satisfaction of certain conditions precedent and Products Corporation'sCorporation’s compliance with other covenants in the 2004 Credit Agreement, including a fixed charge coverage ratio that applies when the excess borrowing base is less than $30.0.

$30.0 million. In March 2005 Products Corporation used the $800prepaid $100.0 million of proceeds from borrowingsindebtedness outstanding under the Term Loan Facility, to repay in fulltogether with accrued interest and the $290.5 of outstanding indebtedness (including accrued interest) under Products Corporation's credit agreement dated November 30, 2001 and which was scheduled to mature on May 30, 2005 (the "2001 Credit Agreement"), to purchase and redeem in July and August 2004 (the "Tender Offer") all$5.0 million prepayment fee associated with such prepayment, using a portion of the $363 aggregate principal amountproceeds from the issuance of the 12%Original 2005 9½% Senior Secured Notes for a purchase price of approximately $412.3 (including the applicable premium and accrued interest), and to pay fees and expenses incurred in connection with the 2004 Credit Agreement, the Tender Offer for the 12% Senior Secured Notes and the Revlon Exchange Transactions, including the payment of expenses related to a refinancing that Products Corporation launched in May 2004 but did not consummate. The balance of such proceeds is available to Products Corporation for general corporate purposes. The Multi-Currency Facility was undrawn at March 1, 2005.Notes.

The Multi-Currency Facility will terminate on July 9, 2009 and the loans under the Term Loan Facility will mature on July 9, 2010; provided that the 2004 Credit Agreement will terminate on October 31, 2005 if the 8 1/8% Senior Notes are not repaid, redeemed, repurchased or defeased in full on or before such date, on July 31, 2006 if the 9% Senior Notes are not repaid, redeemed, repurchased or defeased in full on or before such date, and on October 30, 2007 if the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes are not repaid, redeemed, repurchased, defeased or defeasedrepaid on or before such date such that not more than $25.0 million in aggregate principal amount of theProducts Corporation’s 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes remain outstanding. In addition to customary events of default, it would be an event of default under the 2004 Credit Agreement if Revlon, Inc. failedfails to undertakecomplete an approximately $110.0 million equity offeringissuance and transfer the net proceeds of such offeringequity issuance to Products Corporation to reduce Products Corporation's outstanding indebtedness by March 31, 2006. Although the Company intends2006, which Products Corporation must promptly use to refinancereduce its 8 1/8% Senior Notes in the first quarter of 2005, in the event the Company does not do so, it could refinance such notes with the proceeds of a debt or equity offering. In order to facilitate any such refinancing that the Company may pursue through an equity offering, in March 2005, Revlon, Inc. and MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings amended MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings' obligationoutstanding indebtedness. (See ‘‘Recent Developments’’).

Borrowings under the 2004

Investment AgreementMulti-Currency Facility (other than loans in foreign currencies) bear interest at a rate equal to, backstopat Products Corporation's option, either (A) the Alternate Base Rate plus 1.50%; or (B) the Eurodollar Rate plus 2.50%. Loans in foreign currencies bear interest in certain limited circumstances or if mutually acceptable to Products Corporation and the relevant foreign lenders at the Local Rate, and otherwise at the Eurocurrency Rate, in each case plus 2.50%. The loans under the Term Loan Facility bear interest at a $109.7 equity offeringrate equal to, be conducted by Revlon, Inc. by accelerating such obligation to Octoberat Products Corporation's option, either (A) the Alternate Base Rate plus 5.00%; or (B) the Eurodollar Rate plus 6.00%. At December 31, 2005, from March 31, 2006 in the event that Products Corporation has not as of such date refinancedweighted average rate for borrowings under the 8 1/8% Senior Notes and Revlon, Inc. conducts an equity offering to effect such refinancing. (See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements)Term Loan Facility was 10.1%.

The 2004 Credit Agreement requires Products Corporation to comply with various financial covenants and restrictions, including covenants and restrictions relating to indebtedness, liens, investments, sales of assets, mergers and acquisitions, dividends and transactions with affiliates of Products Corporation,Corporation’s affiliates, each of which is subject to limited exceptions. Additionally, the 2004 Credit Agreement contains financial covenants limiting theProducts Corporation’s senior secured leverage ratio of Products Corporation (the ratio of Products Corporation'sCorporation’s Senior Secured Debt to EBITDA, as each such term is defined in the 2004 Credit Agreement) to 5.50 to 1.00 for the four consecutive quarters ending during the period from December 31, 2004 to September 30, 2005; 5.00 to 1.00 for the four consecutive quarters ending during the period from December 31, 2005 to December 31, 2006; and 4.50 to 1.00 for the four consecutive quarters ending March 31, 2007 and each subsequent quarter until the maturity date of the 2004 Credit Agreement, and,Agreement. Additionally, under any circumstances when the excess borrowing base under the Multi-Currency Facility is less than $30.0 million for a period of 30 consecutive days or more, requiring Products Corporation would be required to maintain a consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio (the ratio of EBITDA minus Capital Expenditures to Cash Interest Expense for such period, as each such term is defined in the 2004 Credit Agreement) of 1.00 to 1.00. Products Corporation was in compliance with all applicable covenants under the 2004 Credit Agreement as of December 31, 2005.

At February 1, 2006, the Term Loan Facility was fully drawn and availability under the Multi-Currency Facility, based upon the calculated borrowing base less approximately $16 million of outstanding letters of credit, was approximately $144 million, as the Multi-Currency Facility was undrawn. (See ‘‘Recent Developments’’ regarding recent amendments to the financial covenants under the 2004 Credit Agreement).

2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit

OnIn July 9, 2004, Products Corporation and MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. entered into an agreement, which effective as of August 10, 2004 amended, restated and consolidated the facilities for the MacAndrews & Forbes $65 milliona line of credit, andwith an initial commitment of $152.0 million, which reduced to $87.0 million in July 2005 (as amended, the ‘‘2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan (as to which after the Revlon Exchange Transactions the total term loan availability was $87) into the single 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes line of credit (the "2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit"Credit’’) with availability. (See ‘‘Recent Developments’’ regarding an extension of $152 at Marchthe term of such line of credit). As of February 1, 2005,2006, the commitment under which reduces to $87 as2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of July 1, 2005 and terminates on December 1, 2005. Credit was undrawn.

Loans are available under the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit if (i) the Multi-Currency Facility under the 2004 Credit Agreement has been substantially drawn (after taking into account anticipated needs for Local Loans (as defined in the 2004 Credit Agreement) and letters of credit), (ii) such borrowing is necessary to cause the excess borrowing base under the Multi-Currency Facility to remain greater than $30,$30.0 million, (iii) additional revolving loans are not available under the Multi-Currency Facility, or (iv) such borrowing is reasonably necessary to prevent or to cure a default or event of default under the 2004 Credit Agreement. Agreement or (v) Products Corporation requests such loan to assist it in funding investments in the Company’s brand initiatives.

Loans under the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit bear interest (which is not payable in cash but is capitalized quarterly in arrears) at a rate per annum equal to the lesser of (a) 12.0% and (b) 0.25% less than the rate payable from time to time on Eurodollar loans under the Term Loan Facility under the 2004 Credit Agreement, which on March 1,effective interest rate was 9.35% as of December 31, 2005, was 8.59%, provided that at any time that the Eurodollar Base Rate under the 2004 Credit Agreement is equal to or greater than 3.0%, the applicable rate toon loans under the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit will be equal to the lesser of (x) 12.0% and (y) 5.25% over the Eurodollar Base Rate then in effect.

2005 Refinancing Transactions

In March 2005, Products Corporation issued $310.0 million aggregate principal amount of its Original 9½% Senior Notes. This issuance and the related transactions extended the maturities of Products Corporation's debt that would have otherwise been due in 2006.

The proceeds from the Original 9½% Senior Notes were used to prepay $100.0 million of indebtedness outstanding under the Term Loan Facility of Products Corporation’s 2004 Credit Agreement, together with accrued interest and the associated $5.0 million prepayment fee, and to pay $7.0 million in certain fees and expenses associated with the issuance of the Original 9½% Senior Notes. The remaining $197.9 million in proceeds was used to redeem all of the $116.2 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of Products Corporation’s 8 1/8% Senior Notes, plus accrued interest, and all of the $75.5 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of Products Corporation’s 9% Senior Notes, plus accrued interest and applicable premium. The aggregate redemption amounts for the 8 1/8% Senior Notes and 9% Senior Notes were $118.1 million and $79.8 million, respectively, which constituted the principal amount and interest payable on the 8 1/8% Senior Notes and the 9% Senior Notes up to, but not including, the redemption date, and, with respect to the 9% Senior Notes, the applicable premium. In June 2005, all of the Original 9½% Senior Notes which were issued by Products Corporation in March 2005 were exchanged for the March 2005 9½% Senior Notes, which have substantially identical terms to the Original 9½% Senior Notes, except that the March 2005 9½% Senior Notes are registered with the SEC under the Securities Act, and the transfer restrictions and registration rights applicable to the Original 9½% Senior Notes do not apply to the March 2005 9½% Senior Notes.

In August 2005, Products Corporation issued $80.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Additional 9½% Senior Notes, which priced at 95¼% of par. Products Corporation issued the Additional 9½% Senior Notes as additional notes pursuant to the same indenture, dated as of March 16, 2005, governing the March 2005 9½% Senior Notes (the ‘‘9½% Senior Notes Indenture’’). The Additional 9½% Senior Notes constitute a further issuance of, are the same series as, and will vote on any matters submitted to note holders with, the March 2005 9½% Senior Notes. In December 2005, all of the Additional 9½% Senior Notes issued by Products Corporation were exchanged for new August 9½% Senior Notes, which have substantially identical terms to the Additional 9½% Senior Notes, except that

the August 2005 9½% Senior Notes are registered with the SEC under the Securities Act, and the transfer restrictions and registration rights applicable to the Additional 9½% Senior Notes do not apply to the August 2005 9½% Senior Notes.

Pursuant to the terms of the 9½% Senior Notes Indenture, the 9½% Senior Notes are senior unsecured debt of Products Corporation with right to payment under the 9½% Senior Notes equal in right of payment with any present and future senior indebtedness of Products Corporation. The 9½% Senior Notes bear interest at an annual rate of 9½%, which is payable on April 1 and October 1 of each year, which commenced on October 1, 2005.

As mentioned in ‘‘Overview — Overview of Financing Activities’’, in August 2005, Revlon, Inc. announced its plan to issue $185.0 million of equity, with the proceeds from approximately $110 million of this issuance to be contributed to Products Corporation to reduce its debt and the balance of the proceeds to be available to Products Corporation for general corporate purposes. Additionally, in connection with the 2004 ConsolidatedRevlon, Inc.’s plan to issue $185.0 million of equity, MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit, on July 15,and Revlon, Inc. amended the 2004 Revlon, Inc., Fidelity Management & Research Company ("Fidelity") andInvestment Agreement to increase MacAndrews & Forbes agreedForbes' commitment to eliminate the Borrowing Limitation (as hereinafter defined)purchase such equity as is necessary to ensure that Revlon, Inc. issues $185.0 million in equity. (See ‘‘Recent Developments’’).

2004 Debt ReductionRefinancing Transactions

In February 2004, Revlon, Inc.'s Board of Directors approved agreements with Fidelity Management & Research Company (‘‘Fidelity’’) and MacAndrews & Forbes intended to dramatically strengthen the Company's balance sheet. The decisionsheet, as well as an Investment Agreement (the ‘‘2004 Investment Agreement’’) with MacAndrews & Forbes covering a series of transactions designed to enter into these transactions followed the announcement in December 2003 that Revlon, Inc.'s Boardreduce Products Corporation's levels of Directors had authorized management to begin exploring various alternatives to strengthen the Company's balance sheet and increase equity. Certain aspects of the refinancings may be subject to Board of Director, stockholder, lender, and regulatory approvals.indebtedness.

In March 2004, Revlon, Inc. exchanged approximately $804 million of Products Corporation'sCorporation’s debt, $54.6 million of Revlon, Inc. Preferred Stockpreferred stock and $9.9 million of accrued interest for 299,969,493 shares of Revlon Class A

Common Stock ("(the ‘‘Revlon Exchange Transactions"Transactions’’). As a result of the Revlon Exchange Transactions, Revlon, Inc. reduced Products Corporation's debt by approximately $804 million on March 25, 2004. In addition to the Revlon Exchange Transactions, pursuant to the 2004 Investment Agreement, Revlon, Inc. is committed to conduct further rights and equity offerings in the amount of approximately $110 by the end of March 2006, the net proceeds of which will be transferred to Products Corporation to reduce its debt (such equity offerings, together with the Revlon Exchange Transactions, are referred to as the "Debt‘‘Debt Reduction Transactions"Transactions’’). The terms of any other equity offeringsUnder the 2004 Credit Agreement, MacAndrews & Forbes agreed to take, or cause to be undertaken in connection withtaken, all commercially reasonable actions to facilitate the Debt Reduction Transactions, including the subscription prices, will be determined by Revlon, Inc.'s BoardTransactions. (See ‘‘Recent Developments’’ and ‘‘—Overview — Overview of Directors at the appropriate times. (See "Recent Developments").

As partFinancing Activities’’ for further discussion of the Revlon Exchange Transactions, MacAndrews & Forbes received Revlon Class A Common Stock in respect of any and all outstanding amounts owing to it, as of the closing date of the Revlon Exchange Transactions, under the MacAndrews & Forbes $100 term loan (which was approximately $109.7 at March 25, 2004, including accrued interest), the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan (which was approximately $38.9 at March 25, 2004, including accrued interest) and approximately $24.1 of subordinated promissory notes. The portions of the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan and the MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line of credit (which was undrawn) not exchanged in the Revlon Exchange Transactions remained available to Products Corporation, subject to the Borrowing Limitation, which was subsequently eliminated. The 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan and the MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line of credit were consolidated into the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit in July 2004. (See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements)such proposed equity issuances).

In another contemporaneous transaction to the Revlon Exchange Transactions, Revlon, Inc. and Fidelity entered into a stockholders agreement (the "Stockholders Agreement"‘‘Stockholders Agreement’’) pursuant to which, among other things, (i) Revlon, Inc. agreed to continue to maintain a majority of independent directors (as defined by NYSE listing standards) on its Board of Directors, as it currently does;does (as of February 1, 2006, eight of Revlon, Inc.’s twelve directors are independent); (ii) Revlon, Inc. would establish and maintain a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors, which it formed in March 2004; and (iii) Revlon, Inc. agreed to certain restrictions with respect to Revlon, Inc.'s conducting any business or entering into any transactions or series of related transactions with any of its affiliates, any holders of 10% or more of the outstanding voting stock or any affiliates of such holders (in each case, other than its subsidiaries). The Stockholders Agreement will terminate at such time as Fidelity ceases to be the beneficial holder of at least 5% of Revlon, Inc.'s outstanding voting stock. Also, in conjunction with the Revlon Exchange Transactions, in February 2004, Products Corporation entered into various amendments to its 2001 Credit Agreement that it entered into on November 30, 2001, one of which added a new $64.4 term loan facility to the 2001 Credit Agreement (the "Exchange Bank Amendments"), which agreement was subsequently refinanced in July 2004, as discussed above.

As a result of the consummation of the Revlon Exchange Transactions, approximately $133.8 principal amount of the 8 1/8% Senior Notes, approximately $174.5 principal amount of the 9% Senior Notes and approximately $322.9 principal amount of the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes (collectively, the "Revlon Exchange Notes") were exchanged for an aggregate of approximately 224.1 million shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock, including such shares issued in exchange for accrued interest on the Revlon Exchange Notes. Such amount of Revlon Exchange Notes exchanged included approximately $1.0 of the 9% Senior Notes and approximately $286.7 of the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes tendered by MacAndrews & Forbes and other entities related to it; and approximately $85.9 of the 9% Senior Notes, approximately $77.8 of the 8 1/8% Senior Notes and approximately $32.1 of the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes tendered by funds and accounts managed by Fidelity.

MacAndrews & Forbes exchanged approximately $109.7 of existing indebtedness (including principal and accrued interest) under the MacAndrews & Forbes $100 million term loan (as hereinafter defined) for approximately 43.9 million shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock, approximately $38.9 of existing indebtedness (including principal and accrued interest) under the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan for approximately 15.6 million shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock and approximately $24.1 of indebtedness under certain subordinated promissory notes payable to MacAndrews & Forbes for approximately 7.2 million shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock. REV Holdings

exchanged all of Revlon, Inc.'s previously outstanding Series A preferred stock for an aggregate of approximately 8.7 million shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock and converted all of its shares of Revlon, Inc.'s previously outstanding Series B preferred stock into 433,333 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock.

As of December 31, 2004, Revlon, Inc. had outstanding 338,867,944 shares of its Revlon Class A Common Stock and 31.25 million shares of Revlon Class B Common Stock, with MacAndrews & Forbes beneficially owning as of that date approximately 221.4 million shares of the Revlon Common Stock (including approximately 32.6 million shares of the Revlon Class A Common Stock beneficially owned by a family member of the controlling stockholder with respect to which MacAndrews & Forbes holds a voting proxy). Such shares beneficially owned by MacAndrews & Forbes as of December 31, 2004 represented approximately 59.9% of the outstanding shares of the Revlon Common Stock and approximately 77.2% of the combined voting power of the Revlon Common Stock. Of the shares beneficially owned by MacAndrews & Forbes as of that date, REV Holdings owned approximately 20.8 million shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock and 31.25 million shares of Revlon Class B Common Stock.

In connection with consummating the Revlon Exchange Transactions, Revlon, Inc. announced that its previously announced plan to launch a rights offering and use the proceeds to reduce debt by a further $50 by year-end 2004 was reduced to $9.7, as a result of $190.3 of Revlon Exchange Notes having been exchanged in excess of the Revlon Exchange Notes committed to be exchanged by MacAndrews & Forbes and Fidelity under their respective support agreements. This $190.3 more than satisfied Revlon, Inc.'s plan to reduce debt through the Revlon Exchange Offers (as hereinafter defined) by $150 in addition to the Revlon Exchange Notes that were committed to be exchanged in the support agreements with MacAndrews & Forbes and Fidelity. The $40.3 difference satisfied all but $9.7 of the Company's plan to reduce debt (in addition to the Revlon Exchange Notes) by a further $50 by year-end 2004. Because the costs and expenses, as well as the use of organizational resources, associated with a $9.7 rights offering would have been unduly disproportionate, Revlon, Inc.'s support agreements with MacAndrews & Forbes and Fidelity and its investment agreement with MacAndrews & Forbes (the "2004 Investment Agreement") relating to the Company's debt reduction plan were amended to enable Revlon, Inc. to satisfy the remaining $9.7 of debt reduction as part of the final stage of the Company's debt reduction plan. Therefore, Revlon, Inc. now intends to conduct an equity offering of approximately $110 by the end of March 2006 and to use such proceeds to reduce Products Corporation's debt. Consistent with agreements between MacAndrews & Forbes and Revlon, Inc. entered into contemporaneously with the agreements relating to the Revlon Exchange Transactions, MacAndrews & Forbes agreed to back-stop the $110 equity offering. (See "Recent Developments").

Products Corporation's EBITDA (as defined in the 2001 Credit Agreement) for the four consecutive fiscal quarters ended December 31, 2003 was less than the minimum of $230 required under the 2001 Credit Agreement for that period and Products Corporation's leverage ratio was 1.66:1.00, which was in excess of the maximum ratio of 1.10:1.00 permitted under the 2001 Credit Agreement for that period. Accordingly, Products Corporation sought and on January 28, 2004 secured an amendment to the 2001 Credit Agreement (the "January 2004 Bank Amendment") that included waivers of compliance with these covenants for the four quarters ended December 31, 2003 and, in light of the Company's expectation that its plan would affect Products Corporation's ability to comply with these covenants under the 2001 Credit Agreement during 2004, an amendment to eliminate the EBITDA and leverage ratio covenants of the 2001 Credit Agreement for the first three quarters of 2004 and a waiver of compliance with such covenants for the four quarters ending December 31, 2004 expiring on January 31, 2005. In July 2004, the 2001 Credit Agreement was repaid and refinanced with the 2004 Credit Agreement.

In December 2003, Revlon, Inc. announced that its Board of Directors approved two loans from MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, one to provide up to $100 (the "2004 MacAndrews & Forbes Loan"), if needed, to enable the Company to continue to implement and refine its plan, and the other to provide an additional $25 (the "$25 million MacAndrews & Forbes Loan") to be used for general corporate purposes. The 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes Loan and $25 million MacAndrews & Forbes Loan were consolidated into one term loan agreement (referred to herein as the "2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan").

The 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan, as discussed in Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, was consolidated with the MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line of credit into the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit in July 2004, with availability of $152. (See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

2003 Financing Transactions

In February 2003, Revlon, Inc. entered into an investment agreement with MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. (the "2003 Investment Agreement") pursuant to which Revlon, Inc. undertook and, on June 20, 2003, completed, a $50 equity rights offering (the "2003 Rights Offering"), pursuant to which Revlon, Inc. issued an additional 17,605,650 shares of its Revlon Class A Common Stock, including 3,015,303 shares subscribed for by the public and 14,590,347 shares issued to MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. in a private placement (representing the number of shares of Revlon, Inc.'s Revlon Class A Common Stock that MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. would otherwise have been entitled to purchase pursuant to its basic subscription privilege, which was approximately 83% of the shares of Revlon, Inc.'s Revlon Class A Common Stock offered in the 2003 Rights Offering).

In addition, in connection with the 2003 Investment Agreement, MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. also made available a $100 term loan to Products Corporation (the "MacAndrews & Forbes $100 million term loan"). The MacAndrews & Forbes $100 million term loan was exchanged for equity in connection with the Revlon Exchange Transactions. (See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Additionally, MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. also provided Products Corporation with an additional $40 line of credit during 2003, which amount was originally to increase to $65 on January 1, 2004 (the "MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line of credit") (the MacAndrews & Forbes $100 million term loan and the MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line of credit, each as amended, are referred to as the "2003 MacAndrews & Forbes Loans") and which was originally to be available to Products Corporation through December 31, 2004 (which, as discussed in Note 9, was consolidated with the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan into the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit in July 2004).

Sources and Uses

The Company's principal sources of funds are expected to be operating revenues, cash on hand, net cash proceeds from the planned $75 million equity issuance described in ‘‘Recent Developments’’, and funds available for borrowing under the 2004 Credit Agreement, the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit and other permitted lines of credit. (See Note 9 to‘‘Recent Developments’’ regarding the

extension of the term of the 2004 Consolidated Financial Statements).MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit ). The 2004 Credit Agreement, the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit Products Corporation'sand the indentures governing the 9½% Senior Notes and the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008 (the "8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes"), Products Corporation's 8 1/8% Senior Notes due 2006 (the "8 1/8% Senior Notes") and Products Corporation's 9% Senior Notes due 2006 (the "9% Senior Notes") contain certain provisions that by their terms limit Products Corporation'sCorporation and its subsidiaries' ability to, among other things, incur additional debt. See "Part I, Item 1—Recent Developments."

The Company's principal uses of funds are expected to be the payment of operating expenses, including expenses in connection with the continued implementation of, and refinement to, the Company'sCompany’s plan (including the Company’s brand initiatives referred to in ‘‘—Overview — Overview of Brand Initiatives’’), purchases of permanent wall displays, capital expenditure requirements, payments in connection with the Company'sCompany’s restructuring programs referred to herein and under ‘‘Recent Developments’’, debt service payments and costs and regularly scheduled pension and post-retirement benefit plan contributions. Cash contributions to the Company's pension and post-retirement benefit plans were approximately $34$27 million in 20042005 and the Company expects them to be approximately $24$33 million in 2005.2006. In 2005, the Company’s purchases of wall displays were approximately $70 million and capital expenditures were approximately $26 million.

The Company continues to make certain investments in connection with its brand initiatives, most notably in the area of permanent displays and inventory. In terms of the cash flow impact of these brand initiatives, the Company expects that its investment in permanent displays, including displays for its existing businesses and these brand initiatives, will be in the range of $85 million to $95 million for 2006, returning to more normalized levels thereafter. The Company’s working capital increased significantly during the second half of 2005, due principally to the brand initiatives, and is expected to return to more normalized levels in relation to sales during the second half of 2006. The Company estimates that capital expenditures for 2006 will be approximately $35 million.

The Company has undertaken a number of programs to efficiently manage its cash and working capital including, among other things, programs to carefully manage inventory levels, centralized purchasing to secure discounts and efficiencies in procurement, and providing additional discounts to U.S. customers for more timely payment of receivables and careful management of accounts payable.

TheIn 2002, the Company previously estimated that charges related to the implementation of the stabilizationStabilization and growth phaseGrowth Phase of its plan would not exceed $160.$160 million. The Company recorded charges of approximately $104 million in 2002, approximately $31 million in 2003 and nil in 2004after 2003 related to the implementation of the stabilization

Stabilization and growth phaseGrowth Phase of its plan. Cash payments related to the foregoing charges were approximately nil, $20 million and $80 million during 2005, 2004 and $20 during 2003, and 2004, respectively.

The Company developed aContinuing to implement and refine the Company’s plan could include taking advantage of additional opportunities to reposition, repackage or reformulate one or more brands or product lines, launching additional new design for its wall displays (whichbrands or products and/or further refining the Company’s approach to retail merchandising. Any of these actions, whose intended purpose would be to create value through profitable growth, could result in the Company is continuingmaking investments or recognizing charges related to refine as part of the implementation of its plan) and began installing them at certain customers' retail stores during 2002. While most of the new wall displays were installed during 2002 and 2003, the Company continued to install the remainder of the wall displays during 2004. The Company is also reconfiguring existing wall displays at its retail customers. Accordingly, the Company accelerated the amortization of its old wall displays. The Company estimates that purchases of wall displays for 2005 will be approximately $50 to $60. The Company estimates that capital expenditures for 2005 will be approximately $20 to $30.executing against such opportunities.

The Company expects that operating revenues, cash on hand, net cash proceeds from the planned $75 million equity issuance described in ‘‘Recent Developments’’ and funds available for borrowing under the 2004 Credit Agreement, the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit and other permitted lines of credit will be sufficient to enable the Company to cover its operating expenses for 2005,2006, including cash requirements in connection with the Company'sCompany’s operations, the continued implementation of, and refinement to, the Company'sCompany’s plan (including the Company’s brand initiatives referred to in ‘‘— Overview — Overview of Brand Initiatives’’), cash requirements in connection with the Company'sCompany’s restructuring programs referred to above, the Company'sCompany’s debt service requirements and regularly scheduled pension and post-retirement plan contributions. (See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). However, there can be no assurance that such funds will be sufficient to meet the Company'sCompany’s cash requirements on a consolidated basis. If the Company'sCompany’s anticipated level of revenue growth is not achieved because, for example, of decreased consumer spending in response to weak economic conditions or weakness in the mass marketmass-market cosmetics category, adverse changes in currency, increased competition from the Company'sCompany’s competitors, changes in consumer purchasing habits, including with respect to shopping channels, retailer inventory management or the Company'sCompany’s advertising and marketing plans or brand initiatives are not as successful as anticipated,

or if the Company'sCompany’s expenses associated with the continued implementation of, and refinement to, the Company'sCompany’s plan exceed the anticipated level of expenses, the Company'sCompany’s current sources of funds may be insufficient to meet the Company'sCompany’s cash requirements.

TheAlthough the U.S. mass-market for color cosmetics category duringadvanced 3.2% for the year ended December 31, 2005, as compared with 2004, and 2003 was softer than the Company expected, declining by 2.5% in 2004 and 1.9% in 2003. Despite this softness in the U.S. mass-market color cosmetics category based upon the Company's belief that its continued implementation of its plan is proving effective, the Company intends to continue to support its plan. Additionally,declined by approximately 0.6% in 2004 from 2003 and declined by approximately 1.1% in 2003 from 2002. In the event of a decrease in demand for the Company's products, reduced sales, lack of increases in demand and sales, changes in consumer purchasing habits, including with respect to shopping channels, retailer inventory management and/or increased returns or expenses associated with the continued implementation of, and refinement to, the Company's plan exceed the Company'sexceeding its expectations, any such development, if significant, could reduce the Company'sProducts Corporation's revenues and could adversely affect Products Corporation's ability to comply with certain financial covenants under the 2004 Credit Agreement and in such event the Company could be required to take measures, including reducing discretionary spending.

If the Company is unable(See Item 1A, ‘‘Risk Factors — The Company’s ability to satisfyservice its debt and meet its cash requirements from the sources identified above or comply with its debt covenants,depends on many factors, including achieving anticipated levels of revenue growth and expenses. If such levels prove to be other than as anticipated, the Company couldmay be requiredunable to adopt one or more alternatives, such as delaying the implementation of or revising aspects of its plan, reducing or delaying purchases of wall displays or advertising or promotional expenses, reducing or delaying capital spending, delaying, reducing or revising restructuring programs, restructuring indebtedness, selling assets or operations, seeking additional capital contributions or loans from MacAndrews & Forbes, Revlon, Inc. or other affiliates or third parties, selling additional debt securities of Products Corporation or reducing other discretionary spending. There can be no assurance that the Company would be able to take any of the actions referred to above because of a variety of commercial or market factors or constraints in the Company's debt instruments, including, for example, market conditions being unfavorable for an equity or debt offering, additional capital contributions or loans not being available from affiliates or third parties, or that the transactions may not be permitted under the terms of the Company's various debt instruments then in effect, because of restrictions on the incurrence of debt, incurrence of liens, asset dispositions and related party transactions. In addition, such actions, if ever taken, may not enable the Company to satisfymeet its cash requirements or comply with its debtProducts Corporation may be unable to meet the requirements of the financial covenants ifunder the actions do not generate2004 Credit Agreement, which could have a sufficient amount of additional capital.

material adverse effect on the Company’s business’’; ‘‘—The Company may havebe unable to increase its sales through the Company’s primary distribution channels’’; and ‘‘—Restrictions and covenants in Products Corporation’s debt maturingagreements limit its ability to take certain actions and impose consequences in 2005 if andthe event of failure to the extent Products Corporation draws under the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit. comply’’).

As noted in "Recent Developments"‘‘—2005 Refinancing Transactions’’, onin April 2005, using the proceeds from the issuance of the Original 9½% Senior Notes in March 8, 2005, Products Corporation announced its intention to complete, inprepaid $100.0 million of principal amount outstanding under the first quarterTerm Loan Facility of 2005, a refinancingthe 2004 Credit Agreement and redeemed all of itsProducts Corporation’s 8 1/8% Senior Notes and 9% Senior Notes due 2006, which currently have outstanding an aggregate principal amount of $116.2 and $75.5, respectively. The Company intendsin April 2005. Products Corporation likewise plans to likewise refinance Products Corporation'sits 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes, with an aggregate principal amount outstanding of $327.0 million, prior to their maturity in 2008. Under the 2004 Credit Agreement, Products Corporation must refinance the 8 1/8% Senior Notes by October 31, 2005, the 9% Senior Notes by July 31, 2006 and theits 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes by October 30, 2007 (such that in the case of the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes not more than $25.0 million aggregate principal amount of such notes remains outstanding). In addition, it would be an event of default under the 2004 Credit Agreement if Revlon, Inc. failed to undertake anissue approximately $110.0 million of equity offering and transfer the net proceeds of such offeringequity issuance to Products Corporation to reduce Products Corporation's outstanding indebtedness by March 31, 2006.2006 to promptly reduce its outstanding indebtedness. (See ‘‘Recent Developments’’ and ‘‘—Overview — Overview of Financing Activities’’ regarding the Company’s planned equity issuances). As of MarchFebruary 1, 2005, Products Corporation2006, the Company had drawn $800.0$700.0 million of outstanding indebtedness under the Term Loan Facility of the 2004 Credit Agreement and had availability of $143.1approximately $144 million under the Multi-Currency Facility, and $152 underbased upon the calculated borrowing base less approximately $16 million of outstanding letters of credit, while the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit.Credit, with availability of $87 million, was undrawn. In addition, in August 2005, Products Corporation issued $80.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Additional 9½% Senior Notes. (See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements)‘‘2005 Refinancing Transactions’’).

The terms of the 2004 Credit Agreement, the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit and the indentures governing the 9½% Senior Notes and the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes, the 8 1/8% Senior Notes and the 9% Senior Notes generally restrict Products Corporation from paying dividends or making distributions, except that Products Corporation is permitted to pay dividends and make distributions to Revlon, Inc. to enable Revlon, Inc., among other things, to pay expenses incidental to being a public holding company, including, among other things, professional fees such as legal and accounting fees, regulatory fees such as CommissionSEC filing fees and other miscellaneous expenses related to being a public holding company and, subject to certain limitations, to pay dividends or make distributions in certain circumstances to finance the purchase by Revlon, Inc. of its Revlon Class A Common Stock in connection with the delivery of such Revlon Class A Common Stock to grantees under the Amended and Restated Revlon, Inc. Stock Plan (the "Stock Plan"‘‘Stock Plan’’).

As a result of the closing of the Revlon Exchange Transactions, (see "— Debt Reduction Transactions and Related Agreements — Debt Reduction Transactions"), as of the end of March 25, 2004, Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and their U.S. subsidiaries were no longer included in the

MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings consolidated group (the "MacAndrews‘‘MacAndrews & Forbes Group"Group’’) for federal income tax purposes. The MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement (as defined below)hereinafter defined) will remain in effect solely for taxable periods beginning on or after January 1, 1992, through and including March 25, 2004. In these taxable periods, Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation were included in the MacAndrews & Forbes Group, and Revlon, Inc.'s and Products Corporation's federal taxable income and loss were included in such group's consolidated tax return filed by MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings. Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation were also included in certain state and local tax returns of MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings or its subsidiaries. In June 1992, Revlon Holdings (as hereinafter defined), Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries, and MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings entered into a tax sharing agreement (as subsequently amended and restated, the "MacAndrews‘‘MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement"Agreement’’), pursuant to which MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings agreed to indemnify Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation against federal, state or local income tax liabilities of the MacAndrews & Forbes Group (other than in respect of Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation) for taxable periods beginning on or after January 1, 1992 during which Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation or a subsidiary of Products Corporation was a member of such group. Pursuant to the MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement, for all such taxable periods, Products Corporation was required to pay to Revlon, Inc., which in turn was required to pay to Revlon Holdings, amounts equal to the taxes that Products Corporation would otherwise have had to pay if it were to file separate federal, state or local income tax returns (including any amounts determined to be due as a result of a redetermination arising from an audit or otherwise of the consolidated or combined tax liability relating to any such period which was attributable to Products Corporation), except that Products Corporation was not entitled to carry back any losses to taxable periods ending prior to January 1, 1992. No payments were required by Products Corporation or

Revlon, Inc. if and to the extent Products Corporation was prohibited under the terms of its 2004 Credit Agreement from making tax sharing payments to Revlon, Inc. The 2004 Credit Agreement prohibits Products Corporation from making such tax sharing payments under the MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement other than in respect of state, local and local incomefederal taxes. The MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement was amended, effective as of January 1, 2001, to eliminate a contingent payment to Revlon, Inc. under certain circumstances in return for a $10 million note by MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, with interest at 12% and with interest and principal payable by MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings onin December 31, 2005.2005, which was paid in full. As a result of tax net operating losses, and prohibitions under the 2004 Credit Agreement, there were no federal tax payments or payments in lieu of taxes by Revlon, Inc. or Products Corporation pursuant to the MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement in respect of 2004.

Following the closing of the Revlon Exchange Transactions, Revlon, Inc. became the parent of a new consolidated group for federal income tax purposes and Products Corporation's federal taxable income and loss will be included in such group's consolidated tax returns. Accordingly, Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation entered into a new tax sharing agreement (the "Revlon‘‘Revlon Tax Sharing Agreement"Agreement’’) pursuant to which Products Corporation will be required to pay to Revlon, Inc. amounts equal to the taxes that Products Corporation would otherwise have had to pay if Products Corporation were to file separate federal, state or local income tax returns, limited to the amount, and payable only at such times, as Revlon, Inc. will be required to make payments to the applicable taxing authorities. The 2004 Credit Agreement does not prohibit payments from Products Corporation to Revlon, Inc. to the extent required under the Revlon Tax Sharing Agreement. As a result of tax net operating losses, we expect that there will bewere no federal tax payments or payments in lieu of taxes byfrom Products Corporation to Revlon, Inc. pursuant to the Revlon Tax Sharing Agreement in respect of 2004. The Company expects that there will be federal alternative minimum tax payments of $0.1 million from Products Corporation to Revlon, Inc. pursuant to the Revlon Tax Sharing Agreement in respect of 2005.

As a result of dealing with suppliers and vendors in a number of foreign countries, Products Corporation enters into foreign currency forward exchange contracts and option contracts from time to time to hedge certain cash flows denominated in foreign currencies. There were foreign currency forward exchange contracts with a notional amount of $31.5$31.9 million outstanding at December 31, 2004.2005. The fair value of foreign currency forward exchange contracts outstanding at December 31, 20042005 was $(2.3).$(0.2) million.

Disclosures about Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

The following table aggregates all contractual commitments and commercial obligations that affect the Company's financial condition and liquidity position as of December 31, 2004:2005:

				Payments Due by Period (dollars in millions)
Contractual Obligations				Total				Less than 1 year				1-3 years				4-5 years				After 5 years
Long-term Debt, Including Current Portion				$1,318.7				$10.5				$534.2				$774.0
Interest on Long-term Debt (a)				461.6				108.4				257.2				96.0
Capital Lease Obligations				5.9				1.6				4.3
Operating Leases				145.5				15.5				47.0				28.6				$54.4
Purchase Obligations (b)				30.1				30.1
Other Long-term Obligations (c)				58.0				49.8				8.2
Total Contractual Cash Obligations				$2,019.8				$215.9				$850.9				$898.6				$54.4

				Payments Due in Period (dollars in millions)
Contractual Obligations				Total				Less than 1 year				1-3 years				3-5 years				After 5 years
Long-term Debt, including Current Portion				$	1,417.0			$	—			$	327.0			$	700.0			$	390.0
Interest on Long-term Debt (a)					571.6				136.0				246.1				180.2				9.3
Capital Lease Obligations					5.2				2.2				2.7				0.3				—
Operating Leases					131.2				15.7				31.9				29.4				54.2
Purchase Obligations (b)					46.1				46.1				—				—				—
Other Long-term Obligations (c)					32.7				16.8				15.4				0.5				—
Total Contractual Cash Obligations				$	2,203.8			$	216.8			$	623.1			$	910.4			$	453.5

(a)	Consists of interest primarily on the 8 1/8%9½% Senior Notes 9% Senior Notes,and the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes and the $800$700 million Term Loan Facility under the 2004 Credit Agreement through the respective maturity dates based upon assumptions regarding the amount of debt outstanding under the 2004 Credit Agreement and assumed interest rates. (See "Recent Developments.")

(b)	Consists of purchase commitments for finished goods, raw materials, components and services pursuant to enforceable and legally binding obligations which include all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction.transactions.

(c)	Consists primarily of obligations related to advertising, insurance, employment contracts and other personnel service contracts. Such amounts exclude severance and other contractual commitments related to restructuring, which are discussed under "Restructuring Costs"‘‘Restructuring Costs’’.

Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

The Company does not maintain any off-balance sheet transactions, arrangements, obligations or other relationships with unconsolidated entities or others that are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on the Company's financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, ‘‘Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.’’ SFAS No. 154 requires retroactive application of a voluntary change in accounting principle to prior period financial statements unless it is impracticable. SFAS No. 154 also requires that a change in method of depreciation, amortization or depletion for long-lived, non-financial assets be accounted for as a change in accounting estimate that is affected by a change in accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 replaces APB Opinion No. 20, ‘‘Accounting Changes’’ and SFAS No. 3, ‘‘Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements’’. SFAS No. 154 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company will adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 154 as of January 1, 2006 and does not expect that its adoption will have a material impact on its results of operations or financial condition.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), "Share-Based Payment."‘‘Share-Based Payment,’’ an amendment to FASB Statements Nos. 123 and 95 ("(‘‘SFAS No. 123(R)"’’), which replaces SFAS No. 123, and supercedes APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting‘‘Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees."’’ SFAS No. 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair valuesvalues. In April 2005, the SEC adopted a rule allowing companies to implement SFAS No. 123(R) at the beginning with the first interim or annual periodof their next fiscal year that begins after June 15, 2005, which for the Company will be effective beginning January 1, 2006. The Company will use the modified prospective transition method, utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model for the calculation of the fair value of its employee stock options. Under the modified prospective method, stock option awards that are granted, modified or settled after January 1, 2006 will be measured and accounted for in accordance with early adoption encouraged. TheSFAS No. 123(R). Compensation cost for stock option awards granted prior to, but not vested, as of January 1, 2006 would be based on the grant date attributes originally used to value those

awards for pro forma disclosures previously permittedpurposes under SFAS No. 123 no longer will be an alternative to financial statement recognition.123. The Company is required to adopt SFAS No. 123(R) in the third quarter of fiscal 2005, beginning July 1, 2005. Under SFAS No. 123(R), the Company must determine the appropriate fair value model to be used for valuing share-based payments, the amortization method for compensation cost and the transition method to be used at the date of adoption. The transition methods are either a prospective method or a retroactive method. Under the retroactive method, prior periods may be restated either as of the beginning of the year of adoption or for all periods presented. The prospective method requires that compensation expense be recorded for all unvested stock options and restricted stock at the beginning of the first quarter of adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), while the retroactive method would record compensation expense for all unvested stock options and restricted stock beginning with the first period restated. The Company is evaluating the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R) and expects that the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) will have a material impactresult in approximately $10 million in additional expenses for fiscal year 2006. This estimate is based on the Company's consolidated resultsnumber of operationsunvested options outstanding as of January 1, 2006 and earnings per share. The Company is currently evaluating the impactestimated number of SFAS 123(R)options to be granted in 2006. This estimate could change based on a number of factors, including differences in the estimate of the number of options granted before 2006 which are forfeited during 2006 and has not yet determined the methodnumber of adoption oroptions actually granted in 2006 and the effect of adopting SFAS 123(R), and it has not determined whether its adoption will result in amounts in future periods that are similar to the Company's current pro forma disclosures under SFAS No. 123.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, "Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets — An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions" ("SFAS No. 153"). SFAS No. 153 eliminates the exception from fair value measurement for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets in paragraph 21(b) of APB Opinion No. 29, "Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions," and replaces it with an exception for exchanges that do not have commercial substance. SFAS No. 153 specifies that a nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. SFAS No. 153 is effective for the fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005 and is required to be adopted by the Company beginning on January 1, 2006. The provisions of this statement will be applied prospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 153 and does not expect that its adoption of SFAS No. 153 will have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations and financial condition.these options at their grant date.

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, "Inventory‘‘Inventory Costs — An Amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4" ("SFAS No. 151").4.’’ SFAS No. 151 amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, "Inventory‘‘Inventory Pricing,"’’ to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted materialmaterials (spoilage). Among other provisions, the new rule requires that the aforementioned items such as idle facility expense, excessive spoilage, double freight, and handling cost be recognized as current-period charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of "so abnormal" as stated in ARB No. 43.charges. Additionally, SFAS No. 151 requires that the allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs

of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005 and is required to be adopted by the Company beginning on January 1, 2006. TheDuring the third quarter of 2005, the Company is currently evaluatingearly adopted the impactprovisions of SFAS No. 151, but does not expect that itswhich adoption will have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

In May 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 106-2 ("FSP 106-2"), "Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003" which provides guidance on the accounting for the effects of the Medicare Act. FSP No. 106-2, which requires measurement of the Accumulated Postretirement Benefit Obligation ("APBO") and net periodic postretirement benefit cost to reflect the effects of the Medicare Act, supercedes FSP 106-1. FSP 106-2 is effective for interim or annual periods beginning after June 15, 2004. Adoption of FSP 106-2 did not have a material impact on the Company'sCompany’s consolidated results of operations and financial condition.position.

Inflation

In general, the Company's costs are affected by inflation and the effects of inflation may be experienced by the Company in future periods. Management believes, however, that such effects have not been material to the Company during the past three years in the United StatesU.S. and in foreign non-hyperinflationary countries. The Company operates in certain countries around the world, such as Argentina, Brazil, Venezuela and Mexico, thatwhich have in the past experienced hyperinflation. In hyperinflationary foreign countries, the Company attempts to mitigate the effects of inflation by increasing prices in line with inflation, where possible, and efficiently managing its working capital levels.

Subsequent Events

See "Part‘‘Part I, Item 1 — Recent Developments."’’

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest Rate Sensitivity

The Company has exposure to changing interest rates primarily in the U.S. under the Term Loan Facility and Multi-Currency Facility of the 2004 Credit Agreement. The Company's policy is to manageCompany manages interest rate risk through the use of a combination of fixed and floating rate debt. The Company from time to time makes use of derivative financial instruments to adjust its fixed and floating rate ratio. There were no such derivative financial instruments outstanding at December 31, 2004.2005. The table below provides information about the Company's indebtedness that is sensitive to changes in interest rates. The table presents cash flows with respect to principal on indebtedness and related weighted average interest rates by expected maturity dates. Weighted average variable rates are based on implied forward rates in the yield curve at December 31, 2004.2005. The information is presented in U.S. dollar equivalents, which is the Company's reporting currency.

Exchange Rate Sensitivity

The Company manufactures and sells its products in a number of countries throughout the world and, as a result, is exposed to movements in foreign currency exchange rates. In addition, a portion of the Company's borrowings are denominated in foreign currencies, which are also subject to market risk associated with exchange rate movement. The Company from time to time hedges major foreign currency cash exposures generally through foreign exchange forward and option contracts. TheProducts Corporation enters into these contracts are entered into with major financial institutions to minimize counterparty risk. These contracts generally have a duration of less than twelve months and are primarily against the U.S. dollar. In addition, the Company

Products Corporation enters into foreign currency swaps to hedge intercompany financing transactions. The Company does not hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes.

The following table presents the information required by Item 7A of Form 10-K as of December 31, 2004:

				Expected maturity date for the year ended December 31,																								Total				Fair Value Dec. 31, 2004
				2005				2006				2007				2008				2009				Thereafter
				(dollars in millions)
Debt
Short-term variable rate (various currencies)				$	36.6																							$	36.6			$	36.6
Average interest rate (a)					4.3	%
Long-term fixed rate — third party ($US)					8.5			$	183.2			$	327.0																518.7				480.4
Average interest rate					8.1	%			8.5	%			8.6	%
Long-term variable rate — third party ($US)					2.0				8.0				8.0			$	8.0			$	8.0			$	766.0				800.0				800.0
Average interest rate (a)					10.2	%			10.2	%			10.2	%			10.2	%			10.2	%			10.2	%
Total debt				$	47.1			$	191.2			$	335.0			$	8.0			$	8.0			$	766.0			$	1,355.3			$	1,317.0
				Average Contractual Rate $/FC																				Original US Dollar Notional Amount				Contract Value Dec. 31, 2004				Fair Value Dec. 31, 2004
Forward Contracts
Sell Hong Kong Dollars/Buy USD					0.1286																			$	0.3			$	0.3			$	—
Buy Euros/Sell USD					1.1939																				1.0				1.1				0.1
Sell British Pounds/Buy USD					1.8288																				6.3				6.1				(0.2	)
Sell Australian Dollars/Buy USD					0.7265																				11.0				10.3				(0.7	)
Sell Canadian Dollars/Buy USD					0.7488																				3.9				3.5				(0.4	)
Sell South African Rand/Buy USD					0.1516																				7.0				5.9				(1.1	)
Buy Australian Dollars/Sell New Zealand Dollars					1.1222																				0.9				0.9				—
Buy British Pounds/Sell Euros					0.6802																				1.1				1.1				—
Total forward contracts																								$	31.5			$	29.2			$	(2.3	)

				Expected maturity date for the year ended December 31, (dollars in millions, except for rate information)
				2006				2007				2008				2009				2010				Thereafter				Total				Fair Value December 31, 2005
Debt
Short-term variable rate (various currencies)				$	9.0			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	9.0			$	9.0
Average interest rate (a)					14.2	%			—				—				—				—				—				—				—
Long-term fixed rate — third party ($US)					—				—				327.0	*			—				—				390.0				717.0				673.4
Average interest rate					—				—				8.6	%			—				—				9.5	%			—				—
Long-term variable rate — third party ($US)					—				—				—				—				700.0				—				700.0				700.0
Average interest rate (a)					—				—				—				—				11.3	%			—				—				—
Total debt				$	9.0			$	—			$	327.0			$	—			$	700.0			$	390.0			$	1,426.0			$	1,382.4

Forward Contracts				Average Contractual Rate $/FC				Original US Dollar Notional Amount				Contract Value December 31, 2005				Fair Value December 31, 2005
Buy Euros/Sell USD					1.2484			$	0.4			$	0.4			$	—
Buy Mexican Pesos/Sell USD					0.0927				0.3				0.3				—
Sell British Pounds/Buy USD					1.7835				4.9				5.0				0.1
Sell Australian Dollars/Buy USD					0.7470				7.2				7.4				0.2
Sell Canadian Dollars/Buy USD					0.8374				9.1				8.8				(0.3	)
Sell South African Rand/Buy USD					0.1484				3.8				3.6				(0.2	)
Sell Japanese Yen/Buy USD					0.0085				1.0				1.0				—
Sell Hong Kong Dollars/Buy USD					0.1290				0.3				0.3				—
Buy Australian Dollars/Sell New Zealand Dollars					1.0959				4.0				4.0				—
Buy New Zealand Dollars/Sell USD					0.7050				0.9				0.9				—
Total forward contracts								$	31.9			$	31.7			$	(0.2	)

(a)	Weighted average variable rates are based upon implied forward rates from the yield curves at December 31, 2004.2005.

*	While the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes are due in March 2008, under the 2004 Credit Agreement, Products Corporation must refinance these notes by October 30, 2007, such that not more than $25.0 million of such notes remain outstanding.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Reference is made to the Index on page F-1 of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and the Notes thereto contained herein.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureDisclosures

Not applicable.None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

(a)Disclosure Controls and ProceduresProcedures.. The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company's reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the ‘‘Exchange Act’’), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company's management, with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and

procedures as of the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. As described below under Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, the Company has identified a significant deficiency in the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) which we considered to be a "material weakness." During the first quarter of 2005, we have implemented additional controls and procedures in order to remediate this deficiency and we are

continuing to assess additional controls that may be required to remediate this deficiency. Although this weakness did not result in any material misstatement of our consolidated financial statements and we have received an unqualified audit report from our independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, on our consolidated financial statements, theThe Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as a result of this material weakness, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.

(b)Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.    The CompanyProducts Corporation is not an "accelerated filer"‘‘accelerated filer’’ as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Accordingly, our management's report and the related attestation on ourProducts Corporation’s management is not required to perform an assessment of its internal control over financial reporting arefor, and its management report on its internal control over financial reporting is not required to be included in, the Company'sProducts Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.2005. Revlon, Inc., the owner of 100% of the outstanding shares of the Company'sProducts Corporation's capital stock, which is Revlon, Inc.’s only material asset or holding, is an "accelerated‘‘accelerated filer."’’ The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the SEC's related rules and regulations require Revlon, Inc., beginning with its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, to include management's report on Revlon, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting in Revlon, Inc.'s Annual Reports on Form 10-K and for KPMG LLP, Revlon, Inc.'sinclude a report from its independent registered public accounting firm attesting to attest to management'ssuch management report. In late November 2004, the SEC issued an exemptive order providing a 45-day extension for the filing of these reports and attestations by eligible companies. Revlon, Inc. has elected to rely onincluded this 45-day extension,report and therefore,attestation in Revlon, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 does not include this report and attestation.2005. Revlon, Inc. intends to include this report and attestation's management determined that as of December 31, 2005, its internal control over financial reporting was effective.

KPMG LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited Revlon, Inc.’s financial statements included in an amendment to Revlon, Inc.'sits Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 (as well as Products Corporation’s financial statements included in accordance withthis Annual Report on Form 10-K for the SEC's exemptive order.

During 2004,period ended December 31, 2005), has issued an audit report on Revlon, Inc. spent considerable time and resources analyzing, documenting and testing its system’s management's assessment of internal control over financial reporting. Revlon, Inc. has advised its Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and KPMG LLP that during this process Revlon, Inc. has identified a significant deficiency in internal control over financial reporting, which Revlon, Inc. considered to be a "material weakness," as discussed below. A material weakness is a significant deficiency (as defined in PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 2), or a combination of significant deficiencies, that results in there being more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by management or employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions.

While the Company has not completed its Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 assessment, Revlon, Inc.'s management assessed the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). As of the date hereof, Revlon, Inc.'s management's assessment had identified a material weakness in connection with its estimates of reserves for sales returns. Specifically, the material weakness that the Company identified relates to the Company's controls over the review and validation of estimates of sales returns. In particular, in 2004, an error of approximately $1.2 million in the estimate of the sales return calculation for one of the Company's large customers was not detected in the normal operation of these controls. Our aggregate sales returns reserve for the full fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 in the U.S. was approximately $83 million. That customer acquired a significant number of stores in 2004 and the Company has determined that inventory of some of those newly-acquired store locations was not included in data made available for estimating the reserves for sales returns. As a result, during its 2004 year end closing, the Company understated its estimates of the sales returns related to these newly-acquired stores by approximately $1.2 million. KPMG LLP issuedreport expressed an unqualified opinion on Revlon, Inc.'smanagement's assessment of, and our financial statements.

Revlon, Inc.'s management determined that, due to this weakness, as of December 31, 2004,on the Company's internal control over financial reporting was not effective and therefore believes that upon completion of the Company's evaluation and testing of its internal control over financial reporting, KPMG LLP will issue an adverse opinion with respect to the effectiveness of Revlon, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004.

In an effort to immediately address this weakness, management identified and has implemented the following controls during the first quarter of 2005:

•	in order to more accurately estimate sales returns in the future, particularly following a merger, acquisition or consolidation transaction involving our most significant customers, the Company's

	sales force will provide inventory and point of sale information for each of the customers involved in the transaction; it is intended that this information will provide a base line to better estimate sales returns;

•	the Company will analyze individually inventory and/or point of sale information that are maintained on different systems during the period following a transaction and will separately estimate returns for each of the customers; and

•	the Company will prepare a reconciliation between the inventory and point of sale information for each of the customers involved in the transaction and the sales return estimate for the customer after giving effect to the consolidation.

The Company is continuing to evaluate additional controls and procedures in order to remediate the material weakness. Such additional procedures may include enhanced procedures related to the review and validation of data used in determining its sales return reserves. We believe that these actions, including the steps outlined above and the Company's continuing evaluation of additional controls and procedures, will strengthen our internal control over financial reporting and address the material weakness relating to the procedures concerning our calculation of sales return reserves.

We have discussed this material weakness and these corrective actions and future plans with the Audit Committee and KPMG LLP. Currently, Revlon, Inc. is not aware of any material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting, other than as described above under this section entitled Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There can be no assurance that, as a result of Revlon, Inc.'s ongoing evaluationoperation of internal control over financial reporting, it will not identify additional significant deficiencies, and that any such deficiencies, either alone or in combinationwhich appears on page F-3 of Revlon, Inc.’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 filed with others, will not be considered additional material weaknesses or that such evaluation will be completed by the end of the 45-day extension period.SEC on March 2, 2006.

(c)(b)    Changes in Internal Control Over Financial ReportingReporting..    There have not been any changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 20042005 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting. As described above under Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, the Company has determined that an identified significant deficiency in the Company's internal control over financial reporting is considered to be a "material weakness" and the Company has made changes to its internal control over financial reporting during the first quarter of 2005 as part of its steps to remediate such weakness.

Item 9B. Other Information

At a meeting on March 7, 2005, the Compensation and Stock Plan Committee of the Board of Directors of Revlon, Inc. determined the extent to which objective, performance-based criteria established in early 2004As previously announced by the Compensation and Stock Plan Committee in respect of 2004 had been satisfied, and approved partial cash bonus payouts underCompany on January 18, 2006, Thomas E. McGuire, the Company's Executive Bonus Plan in place during 2004 based onVice President and Chief Financial Officer, and David L. Kennedy, the final results for 2004. Information regarding cash bonus payments for 2004 to NamedCompany's Executive Officers (as defined below)Vice President and President of the Company is set forthCompany's international operations, will rotate their positions and responsibilities, effective in The Summary Compensation Table in Part III, Item 11. (Executive Compensation) of this Form 10-K.

Onearly March 7, 2005,2006, after the Company files this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. In connection with these changes, effective March 2, 2006, Products Corporation entered into a Second Amendment (the "Second Amendment")amendments to the 2004 Investment Agreement with MacAndrews & Forbes pursuantemployment agreements of each of Messrs. McGuire and Kennedy to which the parties accelerated from March 31, 2006reflect their new responsibilities and to October 31, 2006 MacAndrews & Forbes' obligation under the 2004 Investment Agreement to back-stopprovide for a $109.7 equity offering to be conducted by Revlon, Inc. if Products Corporation has not asterm that would expire effective two years after written notice of October 31, 2005 refinanced the 8 1/8% Senior Notes and Revlon, Inc. conducts an equity offering to effect such refinancing. For a descriptionnon-extension of the material terms of the 2004 Investment Agreement and the Second Amendment, see "Part I, Item 1—Recent Developments" and "Part III, Item 13 - Certain Relationships and Related Transactions—Debt Reduction Transactions and Related Agreements—Certain Agreements Relating to the Debt Reduction Transactions—2004 Investment Agreement."agreement. A copy of the Second Amendment issuch employment agreement amendments are attached to this Form 10-K as Exhibit 10.31Exhibits 10.7 and 10.9 and the terms of the Second Amendmentsuch amendments are incorporated herein by reference.

Forward Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004,2005, as well as other public documents and statements of the Company, contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, which are based on the beliefs, expectations, estimates, objectives, visions, projections, forecasts, plans, anticipations, targets, outlooks, initiatives, destinations, visions, objectives, strategies, beliefs, intent, opportunities, drivers destinations and expectationsintents of the Company'sCompany’s management. The Company's actual results may differ materially from those discussed in such forward-looking statements. Such statements include, without limitation, the Company's expectations and estimates (whether qualitative or quantitative) as to:

	(i)	the Company's future financial performance, including the Company's belief that its plan is proving effective and that it has strengthened its organizational capabilitycapabilities (and its expectation to continue to do so in 2005)so) and that it has strengthened its relationships with its key retailers in the U.S.;

	(ii)	the effect on sales of political and/orweak economic conditions, political uncertainties, military actions, terrorist activities, adverse currency fluctuations, category weakness, competitive activities, weak economic conditions, category weaknessretailer inventory management and changes in consumer purchasing habits, including with respect to shopping channels;

	(iii)	the charges and the cash costs resulting from implementing and refining the Company's plan and the timing of such costs, including the Company's belief that the continued implementation and refinement to its plan could include taking advantage of additional opportunities to reposition, repackage and/or reformulate one or more of its brands or product lines and/or launching new brands or product lines and/or further refining its approach to retail merchandising, including, without limitation, the Company’s plans to re-enter the U.S. prestige fragrance market in 2006, any of which, whose intended purpose would be to create value through profitable growth, could result in the Company making investments and/or recognizing charges related to executing against opportunities and the Company's expectation that it will complete its advertising review in the first quarter of 2005;such opportunities;

	(iv)	the Company's plans regarding the continued growth momentum and accelerated growth phaseAccelerated Growth Phase of its plan, including the Company's plans to capitalize on the actions taken during the stabilization and growth phaseprevious phases of its plan, with the objective of increasing revenues and achieving profitability over the long term, by refining and adding to its plan, such as developing and implementing the Company's productivity initiatives, and the Company's expectation that such actions would help it achieve the objective of balancing top-line growth with an improved operating margins;profit margin (including a targeted operating profit margin of approximately 12% by the end of 2008);

	(v)	the Company's plans to further improve its new product development and introduction process;

	(vi)	the Company's plans to continue to increase the effectiveness and reduce the cost of its display walls;walls across categories and brands;

	(vii)	the Company's plans to drive efficiencies across its overall supply chain, including reducing manufactorymanufacturing costs by streamliningcontinuing to rationalize components and by sourcing strategically and rationalizing its supply chain in Europe, the Company's plan to transition its European manufacturing from COSi primarily to the Company's Oxford, North Carolina facility and to secure warehousing and distribution services from third parties in the U.K, and its expectation that such transition will not result in any disruption to its supply chain;strategically;

	(viii)	the Company's plans to optimize the effectiveness of its marketing, including advertising, and media,marketing and promotions;

	(ix)	the Company's plans to continue training and development of its organization so that it may continue to improve its capabilities to execute the Company's strategies, while providing enhanced job satisfaction for its employees;

	(x)	the Company's current expectation and beliefs regarding its two brand initiatives;

	(xi)	the Company's belief that the Almay initiative will build on its healthy beauty heritage and desire among consumers for simplicity and personalization;

	(xii)	the Company's belief that its Vital Radiance initiative, focused on the more mature cosmetics consumer, will serve an affluent and growing consumer demographic currently underserved in the marketplace;

	(xiii)	the Company's expectation that the first quarter of 2006 will benefit from incremental initial shipments associated with the launch of these two brand initiatives;

	(xiv)	the Company's expectation that the cash flow impact of the brand initiatives from its investment in permanent displays, including displays for its existing businesses and the brand initiatives, will be in the range of $85 million to $95 million during 2006, returning to more normalized levels thereafter;

	(xv)	the Company's expectation that due to the brand initiatives, working capital will return to more normalized levels in relation to sales during the second half of 2006;

	(xvi)	the Company’s plans to continue to strengthen its balance sheet and capital structure, including Revlon, Inc.’s plans to conduct a $110 million rights offering and contribute the proceeds from such equity issuance to Products Corporation by March 31, 2006 to promptly reduce its debt by redeeming approximately $110 million of its 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes, as well as its plans to refinance the balance of Products Corporation's 8 1/8% Senior Notes and 9% Senior Notes in the first quarter of 2005 and Products Corporation'sCorporation’s 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes by October 30, 2007 prior to their maturity and Revlon, Inc.'s plans, if Products Corporation does not refinance the 8 1/8% Senior Notes in the first quarter of 2005, to refinance such notes with the proceeds of a debt or equity offering to be conducted by Revlon, Inc., by October 31, 2005 and, absent any such

	equity offering, Revlon Inc.'s’s plans to conduct further rights andan additional equity offerings in the amountissuance of approximately $110$75 million by the end of March 2006, the net proceeds of which would be transferred to Products Corporation to reduce its debt;June 30, 2006;

(x)	(xvii)	restructuring activities, restructuring costs, the timing of restructuring payments and annual savings and other benefits from such activities;activities (including as described in ‘‘Recent Developments’’);

(xi)	(xviii)	operating revenues, cash on hand, net cash proceeds of Revlon, Inc.’s planned $75 million equity issuance, and availability of borrowings under Products Corporation's 2004 Credit Agreement, the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit and other permitted lines of credit being sufficient to satisfy the Company's operating expenses in 2005,2006, including cash requirements referred to in item (xiii)(xx) below;

(xii)	(xix)	the availability of funds from Products Corporation's 2004 Credit Agreement, the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit and other permitted lines of credit, restructuring indebtedness, selling assets or operations, capital contributions and/or loans from MacAndrews & Forbes, Revlon, Inc. or’s other affiliates and/or third parties and/or the sale of additional debt securities of Products Corporation;Corporation and the net cash proceeds of Revlon, Inc.’s planned $75 million equity issuance described in ‘‘Recent Developments’’;

(xiii)	(xx)	the Company's uses of funds, including amounts required for the payment of operating expenses, including expenses in connection with the continued implementation of, and refinement to, the Company's plan (including in connection with its brand initiatives), payments in connection with the Company's purchases of permanent wall displays, capital expenditures,expenditure requirements, restructuring programs (including as described in ‘‘Recent Developments’’), debt service payments and costs and regularly scheduled pension and post-retirement plan contributions, and its estimates of operating expenses, working capital expenses, wall display costs, capital expenditures, cash contributions to the Company's pension plans and post-retirement benefit plans, debt service payments (including payments required under Products Corporation's debt instruments) and charges in connection with the Company's growth plan;

(xiv)	(xxi)	matters concerning the Company's market-risk sensitive instruments;

(xv)	(xxii)	the effects of the Company's adoption of certain accounting principles; and

(xvi)	the Company's estimates of the amount of U.S. federal net operating losses and the alternative minimum tax losses available to the Company;

(xvii)	(xxiii)	the Company's plan to efficiently manage its cash and working capital, including, among other things, by carefully managing and reducing inventory levels, centralizing purchasing to secure discounts and efficiencies in procurement, and providing additional discounts to U.S. customers for more timely payment of receivables and carefully managing accounts payable; and

(xviii)

Revlon, Inc.'s plans to include its management report on its internal control over financial reporting and the independent registered public accountant's attestation on management's report in an amendment to its Annual Report on Form 10-K in accordance with the SEC's exemptive order in SEC Release No. 50754 and its belief that the measures it has taken to date, or any future measures, to remediate the material weakness that it identified in its internal control over financial reporting will prove effective, and that it will successfully complete the remediation.payable.

Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about the Company's beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can be identified by, among other things, the use of forward-looking language such as "believes," "expects," "estimates," "projects," "forecast," "may," "will," "should," "seeks," "plans," "scheduled‘‘estimates,’’ ‘‘objectives,’’ ‘‘visions,’’ ‘‘projects,’’ ‘‘forecasts,’’ ‘‘plans,’’ ‘‘targets,’’ ‘‘strategies,’’ ‘‘opportunities,’’ ‘‘drivers,’’ ‘‘believes,’’ ‘‘intends,’’ ‘‘destinations,’’ ‘‘outlooks,’’ ‘‘initiatives,’’ ‘‘expects,’’ ‘‘scheduled to," "anticipates"’’ ‘‘anticipates,’’ ‘‘seeks,’’ ‘‘may,’’ ‘‘will,’’ or "intends"‘‘should’’ or the negative of those terms, or other variations of those terms or comparable language, or by discussions of strategy, targets, models or intentions. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and except for the Company's ongoing obligations under the U.S. federal securities laws, the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Investors are advised, however, to consult any additional disclosures the Company makesmade in its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed in 2004 and Current Reports on Form 8-K, in each case filed with the CommissionSEC in 20042005 and 20052006 (which, among other places, can be found on the Commission'sSEC's website at http://www.sec.gov). The information available from time to time on such

website shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Additionally, the business and financial materials and any other statement or disclosure on, or made available through, the Company's websites shall not be considered a ‘‘free writing prospectus’’ under the SEC's Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically identified as such. A number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. In addition to factors that may be described in the Company's filings with the Commission,SEC, including this filing, the following factors, among others, could cause the Company's actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by the Company:

	(i)	unanticipated circumstances or results affecting the Company's financial performance, including decreased consumer spending in response to weak economic conditions or weakness in the category, changes in consumer preferences, such as reduced consumer demand for the Company's color cosmetics and other current products, changes in consumer purchasing

		habits, including with respect to shopping channels, lower than expected retail customer acceptance or consumer acceptance of the Company’s brand initiatives, decreased sales of the Company’s existing products as a result of the Company’s brand initiatives and changes in the competitive environment, actions by the Company’s customers, such as retailer inventory management, and actions by the Company's competitors, including business combinations, technological breakthroughs, new products offerings, promotional spending and marketing and promotional successes, including increases in market share;

	(ii)	the effects of and changes in political and/or economic conditions including(such as inflation, monetary conditions military actions, terrorist activities, consumer purchasing habits, including with respect to shopping channels, and foreign currency fluctuations, as well as in trade, monetary, fiscal and tax policies in international markets;markets); political conditions (such as military actions and terrorist activities); as well as the effects of and changes in category weakness, in competitive activities, in retailer inventory management and in consumer purchasing habits, including with respect to shopping channels;

	(iii)	unanticipated costs or difficulties or delays in completing projects associated with the continued implementation of, and refinement to, the Company's plan or lower than expected revenues or inability to achieve profitability over the long term as a result of such plan, including lower than expected sales, or higher than expected costs, arisingincluding as may arise from any additional repositioning, repackaging and/or reformulating of one or more of the Company's brands or product lines and/or launching of new brands or product lines and/or further refining its approach to retail merchandising, including, without limitation, difficulties, delays or difficulties or delaysincreased costs in completing its advertising review duringconnection with the first quarter of 2005;Company’s plans to re-enter the prestige fragrance market in 2006;

	(iv)	difficulties, delays or unanticipated costs in implementing the Company's plans regarding the continued growth momentum and accelerated growth phaseAccelerated Growth Phase of its plan, including difficulties, delays or unanticipated costs in taking actions to capitalize on the actions taken during the stabilization and growth phaseprevious phases of its plan, which could affect the Company's ability to increase revenues and achieve profitability over the long term, as well as difficulties, delays or unanticipated costs related to the Company's actions to refine and add to its plan, such as developing and implementing the Company's productivity initiatives, which could affect the Company's ability to achieve its objective of balancing top-line growth with an improved operating margins;profit margin;

	(v)	difficulties, delays or unanticipated costs in connection with the Company's plans to further improve its new product development and introduction process, which could affect the Company's ability to effectively launch new and restaged products and/or reposition, repackage and/or reformulate one or more of the Company's brands or product lines and generate revenues from such sources;

	(vi)	difficulties, delays or unanticipated costs in implementing the Company's plans to continue to increase the effectiveness and reduce the cost of its display walls;

	(vii)	difficulties, delays or unanticipated costs in implementing the Company's plans to drive efficiencies across its overall supply chain, including reducing manufactorymanufacturing costs by streamliningrationalizing components and by sourcing strategically and rationalizing its supply chain in Europe, including unexpected difficulties, delays, unanticipated costs or disruptions in connection with its plans to transition European manufacturing from COSi primarily to the Company's Oxford, North Carolina facility and to secure warehousing and distribution services from third parties in the U.K.;strategically;

	(viii)	difficulties, delays or unanticipated costs in implementing the Company's plans to optimize the effectiveness of its marketing, including advertising, and media,marketing and promotions;

	(ix)	difficulties, delays or unanticipated costs in the Company continuing to train and develop its organization so that it may continue to improve its capabilities to execute the Company's strategies, while providing enhanced job satisfaction for its employees;

	(x)	difficulties, delays or unanticipated circumstances or costs associated with the Company’s brand initiatives, including the Company's inability to timely implement its brand initiatives, higher than expected returns in connection with the brand initiatives, weaker than expected retail customer acceptance and/or consumer demand for the products launched pursuant to the brand initiatives, the possibility that the Company's product pricing strategies for the brand initiatives will not be accepted by the Company's retail customers and/or consumers or that the Company may experience decreased sales of its existing products as a result of the products launched and sold under these initiatives and the possibility that the Company's current expectations and beliefs regarding the brand initiatives may turn out to be incorrect, or as applicable, overestimates or underestimates;

(ix)	(xi)	the Almay initiative does not achieve its anticipated marketing effects and less than anticipated consumer or retail customer acceptance thereof;

	(xii)	the Vital Radiance brand initiative targeted to the more mature consumer does not achieve its anticipated marketing effects and less than anticipated consumer or retail customer acceptance thereof;

	(xiii)	the Company's inability to achieve the anticipated benefits from these brand initiatives in the first quarter of 2006, such as due to less than expected shipments during the first quarter of 2006 as a result of less than anticipated acceptance of these initiatives from the Company's retail customers and/or consumers or other difficulties, delays or unexpected costs related thereto;

	(xiv)	higher than anticipated costs for permanent displays or unforeseen circumstances affecting the timing or levels thereof;

	(xv)	higher than anticipated working capital or unforeseen circumstances affecting the timing or levels thereof;

	(xvi)	difficulties, delays or unanticipated costs in, or the Company's inability to consummate, transactions to strengthen its balance sheet and capital structure, including difficulties, delays or increased costs associated with, or Revlon, Inc.'s inability to consummate, in whole or in part, the $110 million rights offering by March 31, 2006, to use the proceeds from such rights offering to promptly reduce Products Corporation’s debt, including to redeem approximately $110 million of its 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes, or other difficulties, delays or unexpected costs related thereto, or difficulties, delays or increased costs associated with, or the inability to consummate, in whole or in part, the refinancing of the Company to refinance certainbalance of Products Corporation's debt, including its plans to refinance Products Corporation's 8 1/8% Senior Notes and 9% Senior Notes in the first quarter of 2005 and Products Corporation'sCorporation’s 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes by October 30, 2007 prior to their maturity, and the Company's plans, if Products Corporation does not refinance the 8 1/8% Senior Notes in the first quarter of 2005, to refinance such notes with the proceeds of a debt or equity offering to be conducted by Revlon, Inc. by October 31, 2005 and, absent any such equity offering, Revlon, Inc.'s plans to conduct further rights and equity offerings to reduce Products Corporation's debt in the amount of approximately $110 by the end of March 2006, as well as the inability to issue equity or debt securities, including Revlon Class A Common Stock, for cash or in exchange for Products Corporation's indebtedness and difficulties, delays or theincreased costs associated with conducting, or Revlon, Inc.’s inability of the Company to consummate, in whole or in part, the remaining Debt Reduction Transactions;additional planned $75 million equity issuance by June 30, 2006;

(x)	(xvii)	difficulties, delays or unanticipated costs or less than expected savings and other benefits resulting from the Company's restructuring activities;activities (including as described in ‘‘Recent Developments’’);

(xi)	(xviii)	lower than expected operating revenues, the inability to secure capital contributions or loans from MacAndrews & Forbes, Revlon, Inc. or's other affiliates and/or third parties;

(xii)	(xix)	the unavailability of funds under Products Corporation's 2004 Credit Agreement, the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit or other permitted lines of credit;credit, restructuring indebtedness, selling assets or operations, the sale of additional debt securities or from Revlon, Inc.’s planned $75 million equity issuance described in ‘‘Recent Developments’’;

(xiii)	(xx)	higher than expected operating expenses (including in connection with the brand initiatives), sales returns, working capital expenses, wall display costs, capital expenditures, restructuring costs, regularly scheduled cash pension plan contributions, post-retirement benefit plan contributions growth plan charges or debt service payments;

(xiv)	(xxi)	interest rate or foreign exchange rate changes affecting the Company and its marketmarket-risk sensitive financial instruments;

(xv)	(xxii)	unanticipated effects of the Company's adoption of certain new accounting standards; and

(xvi)	lower than expected U.S. federal net operating losses, CNOLs or alternative minimum tax losses available to the Company;

(xvii)	(xxiii)	difficulties, delays or the inability of the Company to efficiently manage its cash and working capital; and

(xviii)

difficulties, delays or unanticipated internal control deficiencies or weaknesses that could affect Revlon, Inc.'s plans to include its management report on Revlon, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting and the independent registered public accountant's attestation on management's report in an amendment to its Annual Report on Form 10-K in accordance with the SEC's exemptive order in SEC Release No. 50754, if the measures taken by Revlon, Inc. to date, or any future measures, to remediate the material weakness that it identified in its internal control over financial reporting prove to be ineffective or difficulties or delays in completing the remediation.capital.

Factors other than those listed above could also cause the Company's results to differ materially from expected results. This discussion is provided as permitted by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

PARTPart III INFORMATION

(Dollars in Part III are actual dollars, not millions)

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

The following table sets forth certain information concerning the Directors and executive officers of the CompanyProducts Corporation as of December 31, 2004.2005. Each Director holds office until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified or until his or her resignation or removal, if earlier.

Name					Position
Ronald O. Perelman				Chairman of the Board and Director
Jack L. Stahl				President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Alan S. Bernikow				Director
Donald G. Drapkin				Director
Edward J. Landau				Director
Barry F. Schwartz				Director

The name, age (as of December 31, 2004)2005), principal occupation for the last five years, selected biographical information and period of service as a directorDirector of the Company ofProducts Corporation for each of the Directors are set forth below:

Mr. Perelman (61)(62) has been Chairman of the Board of Directors of Products CorporationRevlon, Inc. and of Revlon, Inc.Products Corporation since June 1998 and a Director of Products CorporationRevlon, Inc. and of Revlon, Inc.Products Corporation since their respective formations in 1992. Mr. Perelman has been Chairman of the Board of Managers, Manager and Chief Executive Officer of REV Holdings, which files reports pursuant to the Exchange Act, since December 2002. He was Chief Executive Officer of REV Holdings Inc. (the predecessor of REV Holdings) sincefrom 1997 through December 2002 and Chairman of its Board of Directors from 1993 through December 2002. Mr. Perelman has been Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings and various of its affiliates since 1980. Mr. Perelman served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Panavision Inc. ("Panavision"(‘‘Panavision’’) until September 2003 and thereafter began service as Co-Chairman. Mr. Perelman is also a Director (or member of the Board of Managers, as applicable) of the following companies which are required to file reports pursuant to the Exchange Act: Allied Security Holdings LLC ("(‘‘Allied Security"Security’’), M&F Worldwide Corp. ("M&F Worldwide"), Panavision and Scientific Games Corporation ("(‘‘Scientific Games"Games’’).

Mr. Stahl (51)(52) has been President and Chief Executive Officer of Products CorporationRevlon, Inc. and of Revlon, Inc.Products Corporation since February 2002 and a Director of Products CorporationRevlon, Inc. and of Revlon, Inc.Products Corporation since March 2002. Mr. Stahl served as President and Chief Operating Officer of The Coca-Cola Company ("Coca-Cola"(‘‘Coca-Cola’’) from February 2000 to March 2001. Prior to that, Mr. Stahl held various senior executive positions at Coca-Cola, where he began his career in 1979. Mr. Stahl is also a Director of the Cosmetic, Toiletry, and Fragrance Association, Vice Chairman of the Board of the United Negro College Fund and is a member of the Board of Governors of the Boys & Girls Clubs of America.

Mr. Bernikow (64)(65) has been a Director of Products CorporationRevlon, Inc. and of Revlon, Inc.Products Corporation since September 2003. Prior toFrom 1998 until his retirement in May 2003, Mr. Bernikow served as the Deputy Chief Executive Officer of Deloitte & Touche LLP ("(‘‘D&T"&T’’) since 1998.. Prior to that, Mr. Bernikow held various senior executive positions at D&T and various of its predecessor companies, which he joined in 1966. Mr. Bernikow also serves as a Director and as a member of the Audit Committee of Casual Male Retail Group, Inc. and as a Director and as Chairman of the Audit Committee of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation, each of which are required to file reports pursuant to the Exchange Act. Mr. Bernikow is also a director or trustee and serves as Chairman of the audit committees of certain funds for which UBS Global Asset Management (US) Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of UBS AG, or one of its affiliates serves as investment advisor, sub-advisor or manager.

Mr. Drapkin (56)(57) has been a Director of Products CorporationRevlon, Inc. and of Revlon, Inc.Products Corporation since their respective formations in 1992. He has been Vice Chairman of the Board of MacAndrews & Forbes

Holdings and various of its affiliates since 1987. Mr. Drapkin was a partner in the law firm of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP for more than five years prior to 1987. Mr. Drapkin is also a Director (or member of the Board of Managers, as applicable) of the following companies which are required to file reports

pursuant to the Exchange Act: Allied Security, Anthracite Capital, Inc., Nephros Inc., Playboy Enterprises, Inc. and SIGA Technologies, Inc.

Mr. Landau (74)(75) has been a Director of Products Corporation since June 1992 and a Director of Revlon, Inc. since June 1996. Prior to1996 and of Products Corporation since June 1992. From February 1998 until his retirement in February 2003, Mr. Landau was Of Counsel at the law firm of Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen LLP, ("Wolf, Block") since February 1998, and was a Senior Partner of Lowenthal, Landau, Fischer & Bring, P.C., a predecessor to such firm, for more than five years prior to that date.February 1998.

Mr. Schwartz (54)(55) has been a Director of Products Corporation since March 2004. Mr. Schwartz has been Executive Vice President and General Counsel of REV Holdings since December 2002 and a Manager since March 2004 and was Executive Vice President and General Counsel of REV Holdings Inc. from March 1997 through December 2002. He has been Executive Vice President and General Counsel of MacAndrews & Forbes and various of its affiliates since 1993. Mr. Schwartz was Senior Vice President of MacAndrews & Forbes and various of its affiliates from 1989 to 1993. Mr. Schwartz is also a director of Scientific Games, which is required to file reports pursuant to the Exchange Act.

Executive Officers

The following table sets forth each of the executive officers of Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation and Revlon, Inc. as of December 31, 2004,2005, except for Mr. KretzmanKennedy who became an executive officer effective in early March 2005:2006:

Name				Position
Jack L. Stahl				President and Chief Executive Officer
Thomas E. McGuire				Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Douglas H. GreeffDavid L. Kennedy				Former Executive Vice President – Strategic Finance
Robert K. Kretzman				Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer, General Counsel and Secretary

The following sets forth the ages, positions held with Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation and Revlon, Inc. and selected biographical information for the executive officers of Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation, and Revlon, Inc., in each case as of December 31, 2004:

2005, except for Mr. Stahl, (51) has been President and Chief Executive Officerwhose biographical information is included above with the other Directors of Products Corporation and of Revlon, Inc. since February 2002 and a Director of Products Corporation and of Revlon, Inc. since March 2002. Mr. Stahl served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Coca-Cola from February 2000 to March 2001. Prior to that, Mr. Stahl held various senior executive positions at Coca-Cola where he began his career in 1979. Mr. Stahl is also a Director of the Cosmetic, Toiletry, and Fragrance Association and Vice Chairman of the Board of the United Negro College Fund and is a member of the Board of Governors of the Boys & Girls Clubs of America.Corporation:

Mr. McGuire (50)(51 has been) served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Revlon, Inc. and of Products Corporation from August 2003 through early March 2006. In early March 2006, Mr. McGuire rotated positions with Mr. Kennedy and became Executive Vice President and President of Revlon, Inc. since August 2003.'s and Products Corporation's international operations. Mr. McGuire was the Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Human Capital Formation, LLC from August 2001 until August 2003. Mr. McGuire was the Chief Operating Officer of Zyman Marketing Group from July 2000 until May 2001. From March 1982 until June 2000, Mr. McGuire held various professional staff and senior financial executive positions at Coca-Cola.Coca-Cola, including positions in its international businesses.

Mr. Greeff (47)Kennedy (59 was) served as Executive Vice President – Strategic Finance of Products Corporation and President of Revlon, Inc.'s and Products Corporation's international operations from August 2003June 2002 until February 2005 when he ceased employmentearly March 2006. In early March 2006, Mr. Kennedy rotated positions with the Company. He also served asMr. McGuire and became Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Products CorporationRevlon, Inc. and of Revlon, Inc. from May 2000Products Corporation. From November 2001 until August 2003.January 2002, Mr. Kennedy served as a financial consultant. From September 1998 to May 2000,until 2001, Mr. GreeffKennedy was Managing Director Fixed Income Global Loans,of Coca-Cola Amatil Limited, a publicly-traded company headquartered in Sydney, Australia and Co-headlisted on the Sydney Stock Exchange. Prior to 1998, Mr. Kennedy held several senior management and senior financial positions with Coca-Cola and its divisions and affiliated companies, which he joined in 1980, including various senior financial positions responsible for financial reporting, internal audit, budgeting and forecasting, as well as serving as General Manager of Leverage Finance at Salomon Smith Barney Inc. From January 1994 until August 1998, he was Managing Director, Global Loans and Head of Leverage and Acquisition Finance at Citibank N.A.the Coca-Cola USA Fountain Division from 1992 to 1997.

Mr. Kretzman (53) (54) has been Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer, General Counsel and Secretary of Products CorporationRevlon, Inc. and of Revlon, Inc.Products Corporation since December 2003. Mr. Kretzman served as

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Products CorporationRevlon, Inc. and of Revlon, Inc.Products Corporation from January 2000 until December 2003. Prior to becoming General Counsel, Mr. Kretzman served as Senior Vice President, Deputy General Counsel and Secretary from March 1998 to January 2000, as Vice President, Deputy General Counsel and Secretary from January 1997 to March 1998, and as Vice President and Secretary from September 1992 to January 1997. Mr. Kretzman joined the Company in 1988 as Senior Counsel responsible for mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Kretzman has also served as the Company's Chief Compliance Officer since January 2000.

Compensation of Directors

Directors who currently are not receiving compensation as officers or employees of the Company or any of its affiliates are paid an annual retainer fee of $25,000, payable in quarterly installments, and a fee of $1,000 for each meeting of the Board of Directors or any committee thereof that they attend.attended.

Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert

The Board of Directors of Revlon, Inc., which owns 100% of Products Corporation'sCorporation’s common stock, maintains an Audit Committee in accordance with the applicable SEC rules and the NYSE'sNYSE’s listing standards. Revlon, Inc.'s’s Board of Directors has determined that Revlon, Inc.'s Audit Committee, consisting of Linda Gosden Robinson, Alan S. Bernikow, Paul J. Bohan, Meyer Feldberg and Edward J. Landau, has at least one "audit‘‘audit committee financial expert".expert.’’ Revlon, Inc.'s’s Board determined that Alan S. Bernikow, who is also a member of the Company'sProducts Corporation's Board of Directors, based upon his experience, training and education, qualifies as an audit committee financial expert in that he has (a) an understanding of generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"(‘‘GAAP’’) and financial statements; (b) the ability to assess the general application of GAAP in connection with accounting for estimates, accruals and reserves; (c) experience preparing, auditing, analyzing or evaluating financial statements that present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth and complexity of issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by the Company's financial statements, as well as experience actively supervising one or more persons engaged in such activities; (d) an understanding of internal controls and procedures for financial reporting; and (e) an understanding of audit committee functions. For certain biographical data concerning Mr. Bernikow, see Item 10, "Directors‘‘—Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant".Registrant.’’ Revlon, Inc.'s’s Board further determined that Mr. Bernikow and the other members of theRevlon, Inc.’s Audit Committee are independent of management pursuant to applicable SEC rules and NYSE listing standards regarding the independence of board and audit committee members, including the independence principles set forth in the Revlon, Inc. Board Guidelines for Assessing Director Independence, which are posted on Revlon, Inc.'s website at www.revloninc.com.

Senior Financial Officer Code of Ethics

The Company has a written Code of Business Conduct (the "Code‘‘Code of Business Conduct"Conduct’’) that includes a code of ethics (the "Senior‘‘Senior Financial Officer Code of Ethics"Ethics’’) that applies to the Company's Chief Executive Officer and senior financial officers (including the Company's Chief Financial Officer, Controller and persons performing similar functions) (collectively, the "Senior‘‘Senior Financial Officers"Officers’’). TheIn addition to printable copies of the Code of Business Conduct and the Senior Financial Officer Code of Ethics being available on Revlon, Inc.'s website, www.revloninc.com, the Company will provide a copy of the Senior Financial Officer Code of Ethics, without charge, upon written request to Robert K. Kretzman, Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer, Revlon Inc.,Consumer Products Corporation, 237 Park Avenue, New York NY, 10017. If the Company changes the Senior Financial Officer Code of Ethics in any material respect or waives any provision of the Senior Financial Officer Code of Ethics for any of its Senior Financial Officers, the Company expects to provide the public with notice of any such change or waiver by publishing an appropriate description of such event on Revlon, Inc.'s’s website, www.revloninc.com, or by other appropriate means as required or permitted under applicable rules of the Commission. The Company does not currently expect to make any such waivers.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The following table sets forth information for the years indicated concerning the compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to the persons who served as Chief Executive Officer of the Company

during 20042005 and the four most highly paid executive officers (see footnote (a) below), other than the Chief Executive Officer, who served as executive officers of the Company during 20042005 (collectively, the "Named‘‘Named Executive Officers"Officers’’), for services rendered in all capacities to the Company and its subsidiaries during such periods.

Summary Compensation Table

								Annual Compensation (a)												Long-Term Compensation Awards
Name And Principal Position				Year				Salary ($)				Bonus ($)				Other Annual Compensation ($)				Restricted Stock Awards ($) (b)				Securities Underlying Options				All Other Compensation ($)
Jack L. Stahl					2005				1,300,000				—				80,634				—				—				158,505
President and Chief Executive					2004				1,300,000				455,000				95,677				8,181,000				5,520,000				173,631
Officer (c)					2003				1,300,000				—				103,244				—				100,000				173,277
Thomas E. McGuire					2005				524,231				41,635				57,722				—				130,000				97,116
Executive Vice President and					2004				500,000				735,000				88,973				590,850				995,000				128,631
Chief Financial Officer (d)					2003				182,692				—				18,678				150,500				100,000				25,224
Robert K. Kretzman					2005				521,880				113,985				12,573				—				120,000				11,902
Executive Vice     President, Chief Legal     Officer, General Counsel and     Secretary (e)

						Annual Compensation (a)												Long-Term Compensation Awards
Name and Principal Position				Year				Salary ($)				Bonus ($)				Other Annual Compensation ($)				Restricted Stock Awards ($) (b)				Securities Underlying Options				All Other Compensation ($)
Jack L. Stahl President and Chief Executive Officer (c)				2004 2003 2002					1,300,000 1,300,000 1,125,000			455,000 — 1,300,000				95,677 103,244 82,999				8,181,000 — 3,820,000				5,520,000 100,000 400,000				173,631 173,277 3,966,746
Thomas E. McGuire Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (d)				2004 2003				500,000 182,692				735,000 —				88,973 18,678				590,850 150,500				995,000 100,000				128,631 25,224
Douglas H. Greeff Former Executive Vice President – Strategic Finance (e)				2004 2003 2002				889,817 884,833 811,365				313,980 190,720 600,960				15,529 13,820 16,670				— — 226,800				— — 75,000				1,009,264 14,056 8,974

(a)

The amounts shown in Annual Compensation for 2005, 2004 2003 and 20022003 reflect salary, bonus and other annual compensation (including, as required to be disclosed in accordance with Item 402 of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Exchange Act, perquisites and other personal benefits valued in excess of $50,000) and amounts reimbursed for payment of taxes awarded to, earned by or paid to the persons listed for services rendered to the Company and its subsidiaries. For the periods reported, the Company had an Executive Bonus Planexecutive bonus plan in which executives participated (including Messrs. Stahl, McGuire and Greeff)Kretzman) (see "— ‘‘—Employment Agreements and Termination of Employment Arrangements"Agreements’’). The Executive Bonus Planexecutive bonus plan provided for payment of cash compensation upon the achievement of predetermined business and personal performance objectives during the calendar year that are established by Revlon, Inc.'s’s Compensation and Stock Plan Committee (the "Compensation Committee"‘‘Compensation Committee’’), except that in respect of 2003, as a result of the non-attainment of bonus objectives for that year, the Compensation Committee determined that no bonuses would be payable under the Executive Bonus Planexecutive bonus plan or any other incentive compensation plan of the Company for that year. In addition, no salary increases were provided in 2004 and the Company's bonus plan targettargets for 2004 wasand 2005 were set at 50% and 75%, respectively, of the regular bonus target.targets. For 2004,2005, the Company is reporting the compensation of Messrs. Stahl, McGuire and Greeff,Kretzman, its only executive officers during 2004. In February 2005, Mr. Greeff, the Company's former Executive Vice President – Strategic Finance, ceased employment with the Company.2005.

(b)	See footnotes (c), (d) and (e) below for information concerning the number, value and vesting schedules on restricted stock awards to the Named Executive Officers under the Stock Plan. The options granted to Named Executive Officers during 20042005 pursuant to the Stock Plan are discussed below under "Option‘‘Option Grants in the Last Fiscal Year."’’

(c)

Mr. Stahl became President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company during February 2002. In March 2005,2006, Mr. Stahl willwas entitled to receive a bonus of $455,000$373,190, which he had earned in respect of 20042005 pursuant to the terms of the Executive Bonus Plan,executive bonus plan, and based upon the achievement of certain predetermined, objective performance-based bonus criteria that had been established in early 20042005 by the Compensation Committee. Mr. Stahl waived receipt of such bonus to help fund, in part, discretionary bonuses to participants in the executive bonus plan in recognition of the Company’s significant achievements during 2005, including the launch of the Company’s new Vital Radiance brand and the restage of Almay; securing an approximately 23% increase in shelf space commitments at U.S. retail customers; growth in the U.S. market share for color cosmetics, hair color and beauty tools; the successful refinancing of the Company’s debt which was scheduled to mature in 2006 and extending its term through 2011; and the development of a new fragrance for the Company’s re-entry into the prestige distribution channel. The amount shown for Mr. Stahl under Other Annual Compensation for 20042005 includes $95,677$80,634 in respect of gross ups for taxes on imputed income arising out of (x) personal use of a Company-provided automobile, (y) premiums paid or reimbursed by the Company in respect of life insurance and (z) reimbursements for mortgage principal and interest payments pursuant to Mr. Stahl's employment agreement, as amended. In addition, although not required to be disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table above pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, Mr. Stahl's compensation for 2005 also included (i) $5,652 in respect of use of a Company-provided automobile, (ii) $12,782 in reimbursements under the Company's Executive Medical Plan, (iii) $39,014 in premiums paid by the Company in respect of supplemental long-term disability insurance and (iv) $8,500 for tax preparation expenses in 2005. The amount shown under All Other Compensation for 2005 reflects (i) $16,237 in respect of life insurance premiums, (ii) $135,968 of additional compensation in respect of interest and principal payments on a mortgage loan which Products Corporation made to Mr. Stahl on May 20, 2002 (prior to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and its prohibitions on loans to executive officers) to purchase a principal residence in the New York metropolitan area pursuant to his employment agreement (see ‘‘—Employment Agreements ‘‘) and (iii) $6,300 in respect of matching contributions under the 401(k) Plan.

		In March 2005, Mr. Stahl received a bonus of $455,000 in respect of 2004 pursuant to the terms of the executive bonus plan, and based upon the achievement of certain predetermined, objective performance-based bonus criteria that had been established in early 2004 by the Compensation Committee. The amount shown for Mr. Stahl under Other Annual Compensation for 2004 includes $95,677 in respect of gross ups for taxes on imputed income arising out of (x) personal use of a Company-provided automobile, (y) premiums paid or reimbursed by the Company in respect of life insurance and (z)

		reimbursements for mortgage principal and interest payments pursuant to Mr. Stahl's employment agreement, as amended. In addition, although not required to be disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table above pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, Mr. Stahl's compensation for 2004 also included (i) $21,188 in respect of use of a Company-provided automobile, (ii) $11,886 in Company-paid contributionsreimbursements under the Company's Executive Medical Plan, (iii) $28,028 in premiums paid by the Company in respect of supplemental long-term disability insurance and (iii)(iv) $8,500 for tax preparation expenses in 2004. The amount shown under All Other Compensation for 2004 reflects (i) $16,513 in respect of life insurance premiums, (ii) $135,968 of additional compensation in respect of interest and principal payments on a mortgage loan which Products Corporation made to Mr. Stahl on May 20, 2002 (prior to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and its prohibitions on loans to executive officers) to purchase a principal residence in the New York metropolitan area pursuant to his employment agreement (see "— ‘‘—Employment Agreements and Termination of Employment Arrangements"‘‘), (iii) $6,150 in respect of matching contributions under the Revlon Employees Savings, Investment and Profit Sharing401(k) Plan (a 401(k) savings plan and, as amended and restated from time to time, the "Savings Plan"), and (iv) $15,000 in respect of matching contributions under the Revlon Excess Savings

Plan for Key Employees. On April 14, 2004, Mr. Stahl was awarded a grant of 2,700,000 shares of restricted stock under the Stock Plan. One third of Mr. Stahl's 2004 restricted stock Award vested on April 14, 2005 and, provided Mr. Stahl remains continuously employed by the Company, or if he is terminated by the Company without ‘‘cause’’ or if he terminates his employment for ‘‘good reason’’ (as each such term is described in Mr. Stahl's employment agreement, as amended), his 2004 restricted stock Award will vest as to an additional one-third on each subsequent anniversary of the grant date. No dividends will be paid on unvested restricted stock granted to Mr. Stahl in 2004. The value of the restricted stock Awards granted to Mr. Stahl on April 14, 2004 as reflected in the table is based on the $3.03 per share closing market price of Revlon, Inc.'s Class A Common Stock on the NYSE on the grant date.date, provided, however, only one-third of Mr. Stahl's restricted stock Award had vested as of December 31, 2005 and those vested shares were valued at $2,727,000 on the same basis. The value of these restricted stock Awards as of December 31, 20042005 was $6,210,000,$8,370,000, based on a per share price of $2.30,$3.10, the per share closing market price of Revlon, Inc.'s Class A Common Stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2004. Provided2005, provided, however, because only one-third of Mr. Stahl remains continuously employed by the Company, or if he is terminated by the Company without "cause" or if he terminates his employment for "good reason" (as each such term is described in Mr. Stahl's employment agreement, as amended), his 2004 restricted stock Award will vest in one-third increments beginninghad vested as of December 31, 2005 those vested shares were valued at $2,790,000 on April 14, 2005 and thereafter as to an additional one-third on each subsequent anniversary of the grant date. No dividends will be paid on unvested restricted stock granted to Mr. Stahl in 2004.same basis.

		The amount shown for Mr. Stahl under Other Annual Compensation for 2003 includes $103,244 in respect of gross ups for taxes on imputed income arising out of (i) personal use of a Company-provided automobile, (ii) premiums paid or reimbursed by the Company in respect of life insurance and (iii) reimbursements for mortgage principal and interest payments pursuant to Mr. Stahl's employment agreement, as amended. The amount shown under All Other Compensation for 2003 reflects (i) $16,309 in respect of life insurance premiums, (ii) $135,968 of additional compensation in respect of interest and principal payments on a mortgage loan which Products Corporation made to Mr. Stahl on May 20, 2002 to purchase a principal residence in the New York metropolitan area pursuant to his employment agreement (see "— ‘‘—Employment Agreements and Termination of Employment Arrangements"Agreements’’), (iii) $6,000 in respect of matching contributions under the Savings401(k) Plan and (iv) $15,000 in respect of matching contributions under the Revlon Excess Savings Plan for Key Employees.

Mr. Stahl received a guaranteed bonus of $1,300,000 in respect of 2002 pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement. The amount shown for Mr. Stahl under Other Annual Compensation for 2002 includes $82,999 in respect of gross ups for taxes on imputed income arising out of (i) personal use of a Company-provided automobile, (ii) premiums paid or reimbursed by the Company in respect of life insurance, (iii) reimbursements for mortgage principal and interest payments pursuant to Mr. Stahl's employment agreement and (iv) relocation expenses paid or reimbursed by the Company in 2002. The amount shown under All Other Compensation for 2002 reflects (i) $7,350 in Company-paid relocation expenses, (ii) $13,081 in respect of life insurance premiums, (iii) $79,315 of additional compensation in respect of interest and principal payments on a mortgage loan which Products Corporation made to Mr. Stahl on May 20, 2002 to purchase a principal residence in the New York metropolitan area pursuant to his employment agreement (see "— Employment Agreements and Termination of Employment Arrangements"), (iv) $6,000 in respect of matching contributions under the Savings Plan, (v) $15,000 in respect of matching contributions under the Revlon Excess Savings Plan for Key Employees and (vi) $3,846,000 for imputed income in connection with receipt of an Award of restricted stock reflected in the Summary Compensation Table as to which he made an election pursuant to Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (as amended, the "Code").

On February 17, 2002 (the "2002 Stahl Grant Date"), Mr. Stahl was awarded a grant of 470,000 shares of restricted stock under the Stock Plan and 530,000 shares of restricted stock under the Revlon, Inc. 2002 Supplemental Stock Plan (the "Supplemental Stock Plan"). The value of the restricted stock Awards granted to Mr. Stahl on the 2002 Stahl Grant Date as reflected in the table is based on the $3.82 per share closing price of Revlon Class A Common Stock on the NYSE on the 2002 Stahl Grant Date. The value of these restricted stock Awards as of December 31, 2004 was $2,300,000, based on a per share price of $2.30, the closing price of Revlon Class A Common Stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2004. Provided Mr. Stahl remains continuously employed by the Company, or if he is terminated by the Company without "cause" or if he terminates his employment for "good reason" (as each such term is described in Mr. Stahl's employment agreement, as amended), his 2002 restricted stock Award will vest as to one-third of the restricted shares on the day after which the 20-day average of the closing price of Revlon Class A Common Stock on the NYSE equals or exceeds $20.00 per share, an additional one-third of such restricted shares will vest on the day after which such 20-day average closing price equals or exceeds $25.00 per share and the balance will vest on the day after which such 20-day average closing price equals or exceeds $30.00 per share, provided (i) subject to clause (ii) below, no portion of Mr. Stahl's restricted stock Award will vest until the second anniversary of the 2002 Stahl Grant Date, unless such 20-day average closing price has equaled or exceeded $25.00 per share, (ii) all of the shares of restricted stock awarded to Mr. Stahl will vest immediately in the event of a "change in control" as defined in Mr. Stahl's restricted stock agreement and (iii) on the second and fourth anniversaries of the 2002 Stahl Grant Date, restrictions shall lapse as to an additional 250,000 shares of such restricted stock and on the fifth anniversary of the 2002 Stahl Grant Date, restrictions shall lapse as to 500,000 shares of such restricted stock as to which restrictions had not previously lapsed. In accordance with the terms of the grant, on June 18, 2004, the second anniversary of the 2002 Stahl Grant Date, restrictions lapsed as to 250,000 shares of Mr. Stahl's restricted stock award. In the event that, prior to the fifth anniversary of the 2002 Stahl Grant Date, and subject to clause (ii) of the prior sentence, Mr. Stahl's employment with the Company terminates as a result of Mr. Stahl's "disability" (as such term is defined or described in Mr. Stahl's employment agreement, as amended), restrictions shall lapse with respect to an additional number of shares of restricted stock, if any, such that the aggregate number of shares of restricted stock as to which restrictions shall have lapsed will equal the greater of (i) 250,000 and (ii) the product of (X) 1,000,000 and (Y) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of full calendar months during which Mr. Stahl was employed after the 2002 Stahl Grant Date (disregarding service prior to March 1, 2002) and the denominator of which is 60. In addition, if Mr. Stahl's employment is terminated by Mr. Stahl for "good reason" or is terminated by the Company other than for "cause" or "disability" (as each such term is defined or described in Mr. Stahl's employment agreement, as amended) during the 120-day period immediately preceding the date of a "change in control" (as defined in Mr. Stahl's restricted stock agreement), then the shares of restricted stock previously forfeited upon such termination of employment will be reinstated and the restrictions relating thereto will lapse and such shares will be deemed fully vested as of the date of the change in control. In the event that cash or any in-kind distributions are made in respect of Revlon Common Stock prior to the lapse of the restrictions relating

	to any of Mr. Stahl's restricted stock granted to Mr. Stahl on the 2002 Stahl Grant Date as to which the restrictions have not lapsed, such dividends will be held by the Company and paid to Mr. Stahl when, and if, the restrictions on such restricted stock lapse.

Mr. Stahl's employment agreement was amended on December 17, 2004 to extend the term for three years and to provide for continued vesting of equity awards previously granted to Mr. Stahl in the event that he is terminated by the Company without "cause" or if Mr. Stahl shall terminate his employment for "good reason" (as each such term is defined or described in Mr. Stahl's employment agreement, as amended). Specifically, as described above, in the event that Mr. Stahl is terminated without "cause"‘‘cause’’ or if he terminates his employment for "good‘‘good reason,"’’ the stock option awards granted to Mr. Stahl by the Company on February 17, 2002, May 19, 2003 and April 14, 2004, and the restricted stock awards granted to Mr. Stahl on February 17, 2002 and April 14, 2004, shall continue to vest in accordance with their terms as if Mr. Stahl's employment had not been terminated and he had remained employed by the Company, and those stock option awards shall remain exercisable until the later of (i) one year after such existing option award becomes 100% fully vested and exercisable or (ii) 18 months following Mr. Stahl's termination of employment, but in no event beyond the original option term of each such award.

(d)

Mr. McGuire becameserved as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company duringfrom August 2003. 2003 until early March 2006. In early March 2006, Mr. McGuire became Executive Vice President and President of the Company's international operations. In March 2006, Mr. McGuire will receive a bonus of $41,635 in respect of 2005 pursuant to the terms of the executive bonus plan, and based upon the achievement of certain predetermined, objective performance-based bonus criteria that had been established in early 2005 by the Compensation Committee. The amount shown for Mr. McGuire under Other Annual Compensation for 2005 includes $57,722 in respect of gross ups for taxes on imputed income arising out of relocation expenses paid or reimbursed by the Company in 2005. In addition, although not required to be disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table above pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, Mr. McGuire's compensation for 2005 also included $15,000 in respect of a cash car allowance. The amount shown under All Other Compensation for 2005 reflects (i) $88,078 in Company-paid expenses for temporary corporate housing and travel to and from Atlanta pending his relocation to the New York metropolitan area, (ii) $6,300 in respect of matching contributions under the 401(k) Plan and (iii) $2,739 in respect of life insurance premiums.

		In March 2005, Mr. McGuire will receivereceived a bonus of $135,000 in respect of 2004 pursuant to the terms of the Executive Bonus Plan,executive bonus plan, $70,875 of which will bewas based upon the achievement of certain predetermined, objective performance-based bonus criteria that had been established in early 2004 by the Compensation Committee and $64,125 of which will bewas a discretionary bonus approved by the Compensation Committee in recognition of, among other things, Mr. McGuire's significant contributions to the Company's refinancing activities during 2004. In addition, pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, in January 2005 Mr. McGuire received a $600,000 retention incentive in respect of 2004, intended to assist him towards funding the purchase of a home in the New York metropolitan area (see "— ‘‘—Employment Agreements and Termination of Employment Arrangements"Agreements’’). The amount shown for Mr. McGuire under Other Annual Compensation for 2004 includes $88,973 in respect of gross ups for taxes on imputed income arising out of relocation expenses paid or reimbursed by the Company in 2004. In addition, although not required to be disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table above pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, Mr. McGuire's compensation for 2004 also included $15,000 in respect of a cash car allowance. The amount shown under All Other Compensation for 2004 reflects (i) $119,835 in Company-paid expenses for temporary corporate housing and travel to and from Atlanta pending his relocation to the New York metropolitan area and (ii) $2,546 in respect of life insurance premiums. On April 14, 2004, Mr. McGuire was awarded a grant of 195,000 shares of restricted stock under the Stock Plan. The valueOne-third of theMr. McGuire's restricted stock Awards granted to Mr. McGuireAward vested on April 14, 2004 as reflected in the table is based on the $3.03 per share closing price of Revlon Class A Common Stock on the NYSE on that date. The value of these restricted stock Awards as of December 31, 2004 was $448,500, based on a per share price of $2.30, the closing price of Revlon Class A Common Stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2004. Provided2005 and, provided Mr. McGuire remains continuously employed by the Company, his 2004 restricted stock Award will vest in one-third increments beginning on April 14, 2005 and thereafter as to an additional one-third on each subsequent anniversary of the grant date. No dividends will be paid on the unvested restricted stock granted to Mr. McGuire in 2004.

On August 18, 2003 (the "2003 McGuire Grant Date"), Mr. McGuire was awarded 50,000 shares of restricted stock under the Stock Plan. The value of the restricted stock Awards granted to Mr. McGuire on the 2003 McGuire Grant DateApril 14, 2004 as reflected in the table is based on the $3.01$3.03 per share closing market price of Revlon, Inc.'s Class A Common Stock on the NYSE on that date, provided, however, only one-third of Mr. McGuire's restricted stock Award had vested as of December 31, 2005 and those vested shares were valued at $196,950 on the 2003 McGuire Grant Date.same basis. The value of these restricted stock Awards as of December 31, 20042005 was $115,000,$604,500, based on a per share price of $2.30,$3.10, the per share closing market price of Revlon, Inc.'s Class A Common Stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2004. 2005, provided, however, only one-third of Mr. McGuire's restricted stock Award had vested as of December 31, 2005 and those vested shares were valued at $201,500 on the same basis.

		The amount shown for Mr. McGuire under Other Annual Compensation for 2003 includes $18,678 in respect of gross ups for taxes on imputed income arising out of relocation expenses paid or reimbursed by the Company in 2003. The amount shown under All Other Compensation for 2003 reflects (i) $24,732 in Company-paid relocation expenses and (ii) $492 in respect of premiums under the Company'sCompany’s basic life insurance program. On August 18, 2003 (the ‘‘2003 McGuire Grant Date’’), Mr. McGuire was awarded 50,000 shares of restricted stock under the Stock Plan. Provided Mr. McGuire remains continuously employed by the Company, his 2003 restricted stock Award will vest as to one-third of the restricted shares on the day after which the 20-day average of the closing price of Revlon Class A Common Stock on the NYSE equals or exceeds $20.00 per share, an additional one-third of such restricted shares will vest on the day after which such 20-day average closing price equals or exceeds $25.00 per share and the balance will vest on the day after which such 20-day average closing price equals or exceeds $30.00 per share, provided (i) subject to clause (ii) below, no portion of Mr. McGuire's 2003 restricted stock Award willwas to vest until the second anniversary of the 2003 McGuire Grant Date, (ii) all of the shares of restricted stock awarded to Mr. McGuire in 2003 will vest immediately in the event of a "change‘‘change in control"control’’ (as defined in Mr. McGuire's restricted stock agreement) and (iii) all of the shares of restricted stock granted to Mr. McGuire in 2003 that have not previously vested will fully vest on the third anniversary of the 2003 McGuire Grant Date. No dividends will be paid on the unvested restricted stock granted to Mr. McGuire in 2003. The value of the restricted stock Awards granted to Mr. McGuire on the 2003 McGuire Grant Date (none of the Award had vested as of December 31, 2005) as reflected in the table is based on the $3.01 per share closing market price of Revlon, Inc.'s Class A Common Stock on the NYSE on the 2003 McGuire Grant Date. The value of these restricted stock Awards as of December 31, 2005 was $155,000, based on a per share price of $3.10, the per share closing market price of Revlon, Inc.'s Class A Common Stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2005.

(e)

Mr. Greeff served asKretzman, Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer, General Counsel and Chief Financial OfficerSecretary of the Company during allRevlon, Inc. and of 2002 and until August 2003, when heProducts Corporation, became Executive Vice President – Strategic Finance of the Company. In February 2005, Mr. Greeff ceased employment with the Company.an executive officer effective in March 2005. In March 2005,2006, Mr. GreeffKretzman will receive a bonus of $133,500$113,985 in respect of 20042005 pursuant to the terms of the Executive Bonus Plan,executive bonus plan, and based upon the achievement of certain predetermined, objective performance-based bonus criteria that had been established in early 20042005 by the Compensation Committee. In 2004, Mr. Greeff also received a bonus of $180,480 pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, as a special bonus in respect of repayment of a loan made by the Company to Mr. Greeff when he joined the Company in 2000, prior to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and its prohibition on loans to executive officers (the "2000 Loan") (see "— Employment Agreements and Termination of Employment Arrangements"). The amount shown for Mr. GreeffKretzman under Other Annual Compensation for 20042005 includes $15,529$12,573 in respect of gross ups for taxes on imputed income arising out of personal use of a Company-provided automobile. In addition, although not required to be disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table above pursuant to Item 402 of

Regulation S-K, Mr. Greeff'sKretzman's compensation for 20042005 also included $21,005(i) $17,007 in respect of use of a Company-provided automobile, and $11,886(ii) $12,782 in Company-paid contributionsreimbursements under the Company's Executive Medical Plan in 2004. The amount shown for Mr. Greeff under All Other Compensation for 2004 reflects (i) $3,114 in respect of life insurance premiums, (ii) $6,150 in respect of matching contributions under the Savings Plan and (iii) $1,000,000 to be paid in March 2005 pursuant to the terms of Mr. Greeff's employment agreement and the Greeff Separation Agreement (as defined below), based upon the completion of objectives relating to the successful completion of the Revlon Exchange Transactions and the refinancing of Products Corporation's 2001 Credit Agreement with the 2004 Credit Agreement during 2004. (see "— Employment Agreements and Termination of Employment Arrangements").

In 2003, Mr. Greeff received a bonus of $190,720 pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement as a special bonus in respect of repayment of the 2000 Loan (see "— Employment Agreements and Termination of Employment Arrangements"). The amount shown$1,000 for Mr. Greeff under Other Annual Compensation for 2003 includes $13,820 in respect of gross ups for taxes on imputed income arising out of personal use of a Company-provided automobile. The amount shown for Mr. Greeff under All Other Compensation for 2003 reflects (i) $3,056 in respect of life insurance premiums, (ii) $6,000 in respect of matching contributions under the Savings Plan and (iii) $5,000 in respect of reimbursement oftax preparation expenses in connection with an amendment of Mr. Greeff's employment agreement.

In 2002, Mr. Greeff received a bonus of $600,960, of which $200,960 was paid pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement as a special bonus in respect of repayment of the 2000 Loan (see "— Employment Agreements and Termination of Employment Arrangements") and the balance of $400,000 was a discretionary bonus paid in respect of 2002 pursuant to the Executive Bonus Plan. The amount shown for Mr. Greeff under Other Annual Compensation for 2002 includes $16,670 in respect of gross ups for taxes on imputed income arising out of personal use of a Company-provided automobile.2005. The amount shown under All Other Compensation for 20022005 reflects (i) $2,974$5,602 in respect of life insurance premiums and (ii) $6,000$6,300 in respect of matching contributions under the Savings401(k) Plan. On September 17, 2002 (the "2002 Greeff Grant Date"), Mr. Greeff was awarded a grant of 60,000 shares of restricted stock under the Stock Plan. The value of the restricted stock Awards granted to Mr. Greeff on the 2002 Greeff Grant Date as reflected in the table is based on the $3.78 per share closing price of Revlon Class A Common Stock on the NYSE on the 2002 Greeff Grant Date. The value of these restricted stock Awards as of December 31, 2004 was $138,000, based on a per share price of $2.30, the closing price of Revlon Class A Common Stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2004. As provided in the Greeff Separation Agreement (as defined below), Mr. Greeff's 2002 restricted stock Award will vest as to one-third of the restricted shares on the day after which the 20-day average of the closing price of Revlon Class A Common Stock on the NYSE equals or exceeds $20.00 per share, an additional one-third of such restricted shares will vest on the day after which such 20-day average closing price equals or exceeds $25.00 per share and the balance will vest on the day after which such 20-day average closing price equals or exceeds $30.00 per share, provided (i) subject to clause (ii) below, no portion of Mr. Greeff's 2002 restricted stock Award will vest until the second anniversary of the 2002 Greeff Grant Date, (ii) all of the shares of restricted stock awarded to Mr. Greeff in 2002 will vest immediately in the event of a "change in control" (as defined in Mr. Greeff's restricted stock agreement) and (iii) all of the shares of restricted stock granted to Mr. Greeff in 2002 which have not previously vested will fully vest on the third anniversary of the 2002 Greeff Grant Date. No dividends will be paid on the unvested restricted stock granted to Mr. Greeff in 2002.

Mr. Greeff received a bonus of $511,200 in respect of 2001, of which $211,200 was paid pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement as a special bonus in respect of repayment of the 2000 Loan (see "— Employment Agreements and Termination of Employment Arrangements") and the balance of $300,000 was paid in respect of 2001 pursuant to the Executive Bonus Plan as a short-term cash bonus in recognition of the Company's successful refinancing of its credit agreement in 2001 (which was subsequently refinanced in July 2004) and issuing Products Corporation's 12% Senior Secured Notes (which were redeemed in full during 2004). $150,000 of Mr. Greeff's bonus in respect of 2001 was paid in 2002 and the remaining $150,000 was paid in 2003.

OPTION GRANTS IN THE LAST FISCAL YEAR

During 2004,2005, the following grants of stock options were made pursuant to the Stock Plan to the Named Executive Officers:

				Individual Grants																Grant Date Value (a)
Name				Number of Securities Underlying Options Granted (#)				Percent of Total Options Granted to Employees In Fiscal Year				Exercise or Base Price ($/Sh)				Expiration Date				Grant Date Present Value ($)
Jack L. Stahl					5,520,000				22.51	%			3.03				4/14/11				11,476,080
Thomas E. McGuire					995,000				4.06	%			3.03				4/14/11				2,068,605
Douglas H. Greeff					—				—				—				—				—

The options granted to Messrs. Stahl and McGuire in 2004 under the Stock Plan were awarded on April 14, 2004 and consist of non-qualified options having a term of 7 years. The options vested 25% on December 31, 2004, will continue to vest in additional 25% increments on each December 31st thereafter and will become 100% vested on December 31, 2007. The options have an exercise price equal to $3.03, the per share closing price on the NYSE of Revlon Class A Common Stock on such grant date, as indicated in the table above.

				Individual Grants																Grant Date Value (a)
Name				Number of Securities Underlying Options Granted (#)				Percent of Total Options Granted to Employees In Fiscal Year				Exercise or Base Price ($/Sh)				Expiration Date				Grant Date Present Value ($)
Jack L. Stahl					—				—				—				—				—
Thomas E. McGuire					130,000			2.50%				$	2.55			3/7/2012					177,359
Robert K. Kretzman					120,000			2.31%				$	2.55			3/7/2012					163,716

(a)

Grant Date Present Values were calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The model used March 7, 2005 as applied used April 14, 2004a grant date with respect to options granted to Messrs. StahlMcGuire and McGuireKretzman on such date. Stock option models require a prediction about the future movement of stock price. The following assumptions were made for purposes of calculating Grant Date Present Values: (i) a risk-free interest rate of return of 3.95%, which was the rate as of April 14, 2004 for the U.S. Treasury Zero Coupon Bond issue with a remaining term similar to the3.96%; (ii) expected term of the options; (ii) stock price volatility of 68.99%approximately 61%, based upon the volatility of the stock price of Revlon Class A Common Stock; (iii) a constant dividend rate of zero percent; and (iv) that the options normally would be exercised sevenan estimated life of 4.75 years from the grant date. No adjustments to the theoretical value were made to reflect the waiting period, if any, prior to vesting of the stock options or the transferability (or restrictions related thereto) of the stock options. The real value of the options in the table depends upon the actual performance of Revlon, Inc.'s Class A Common Stock on the NYSE during the applicable period and upon when they are exercised.exercise.

The options granted to Messrs. McGuire and Kretzman in 2005 under the Stock Plan were awarded on March 7, 2005 and consist of non-qualified options having a term of seven years, vesting 25% on March 7, 2006 and continuing to vest in additional 25% increments on each March 7th thereafter, becoming 100% vested on March 7, 2009. These options have an exercise price equal to $2.55, the per share closing market price on the NYSE of Revlon, Inc.'s Class A Common Stock on such grant date, as indicated in the table above.

AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST
FISCAL YEAR AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES

The following chart shows the number of stock options exercised during 20042005 and the 20042005 year-end value of the stock options held by the Named Executive Officers:

Name

Shares Acquired on Exercise During 20042005

Value Realized During 20042005

Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Options at Fiscal Year-End Exercisable/Unexercisable at at December 31, 20042005 (#)

Value of In-The- MoneyIn-The-Money Options at Fiscal Year-End Exercisable/Unexercisable at Unexercisable at December 31, 20042005 (a) ($)

Jack L. Stahl

—

—

1,405,000/4,615,0002,810,000/3,210,000

—

193,700/193,700

Thomas E. McGuire

—

—

273,750/821,250547,500/677,500

—

39,325/110,825

Douglas H. GreeffRobert K. Kretzman

—

—

179,167/45,833595,000/597,500

—

33,425/99,425

(a)

Amounts shown as value of in-the-money options represent the difference between the exercise price of the options (exercisable or unexercisable, as the case may be) and the market value of the underlying shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock at year end, calculated using $2.30,$3.10, the December 31, 20042005 closing market price on the NYSE of Revlon, Inc.'s Class A Common Stock. As the closing price of Revlon Class A Common Stock on December 31, 2004 was less than the exercise price of the stock options referred to in the table above, the options were not in-the-money as of that date and, accordingly, had no value. The actual value, if any, an executive may realize upon exercise of a stock option depends upon the amount by which the market price of shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock exceeds the exercise price per share when the stock options are exercised.

Employment Agreements and Termination of Employment Arrangements

Each of Messrs. Stahl, McGuire and McGuireKretzman has and Mr. Greeff had, an executive employment agreement with Products Corporation.

Mr. Stahl's employment agreement, as amended (as so amended, his "employment agreement"and extended (his ‘‘employment agreement’’), provides that he will serve as President and Chief Executive Officer at a base salary of not less than $1,300,000 per annum, and that he receive a bonus of not less than $1,300,000 in respect of 2002 (which bonus was paid in February 2003) and grants of 1,000,000 shares of restricted stock and 400,000 options upon joining the Company in 2002 (which grants were made on the February 17, 2002 (the ‘‘2002 Stahl Grant Date)Date’’)). The initial term of Mr. Stahl's employment agreement as amended, ends on February 16, 2008, provided, however, that at any time on or after February 17, 2005, Products Corporation may terminate Mr. Stahl's employment by 36 months' prior written notice of non-renewal of the agreement.

Mr. Stahl's employment agreement provides for participation in the Executive Bonus Planexecutive bonus plan and other executive benefit plans on a basis equivalent to other senior executives of the Company generally. Mr. Stahl's employment agreement provides for Company-paid supplemental disability insurance and supplemental term life insurance coverage with a death benefit of $10,000,000 during employment. The employment agreement for Mr. Stahl also provides for protection of Company confidential information and includes a non-compete obligation.

Mr. Stahl's employment agreement provides that in the event of termination of the term by Mr. Stahl for "good reason"‘‘good reason’’ (as defined in Mr. Stahl's employment agreement), or by the Company (otherwise than for "cause"‘‘cause’’ or "disability"‘‘disability’’ as each such term is defined or described in Mr. Stahl's employment agreement), Mr. Stahl would be entitled, at his election, to severance pursuant to Products Corporation's Executive Severance Policy (see "— ‘‘—Executive Severance Policy"Policy’’) (other than the six-month limit on lump sum payments provided for in such policy, which six-month limit provision would not apply to Mr. Stahl); or continued payments of base salary, continued participation in the Company's life insurance plan (which life insurance coverage is subject to a limit of two years) and medical plans subject to the terms of such plans, and continued Company-paid supplemental term life insurance, in each case through the date occurring 36 months after the date of notice of non-renewal, or in the case of medical plan participation only, until such earlier date on which Mr. Stahl were to become covered by like plans of another company. In addition, Mr. Stahl's employment agreement provides that if he remains employed by Products Corporation or its affiliates until age 60, then upon any subsequent retirement he will be entitled to a supplemental pension benefit in a sufficient amount so that his annual pension benefit from

all qualified and non-qualified pension plans of Products Corporation and its affiliates, as well as any such plans of Mr. Stahl's past employers or their affiliates (expressed as a straight life annuity), equals $500,000. If Mr. Stahl's employment were to terminate on or after February 28, 20052006 and prior to February 28, 2006, 2007,

then he would receive 24.99%have received 33.32% of the supplemental pension benefit otherwise payable pursuant to his employment agreement and thereafter an additional 8.33% wouldwill accrue as of each February 28th on which Mr. Stahl is still employed (but in no event more than would have been payable to Mr. Stahl under the foregoing provision had he retired at age 60). Mr. Stahl would not receive any supplemental pension benefit and any amounts then being paid for supplemental pension benefits would immediately cease if he were to materially breach his employment agreement or be terminated by the Company for "cause"‘‘cause’’ (as defined in Mr. Stahl's employment agreement). Mr. Stahl's employment agreement provides for continuation of group life insurance and executive medical insurance coverage in the event of permanent disability.

Mr. Stahl's employment agreement provides that he iswas entitled to a loan in March 2002 from Products Corporation to satisfy state, local and federal income taxes (including any withholding taxes) incurred by him as a result of his makinghaving made an election under Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (as amended, the ‘‘Code’’) in connection with the 1,000,000 shares of restricted stock whichthat were granted to him by the Company on the 2002 Stahl Grant Date. Mr. Stahl received such loan from Products Corporation in the amount of $1,800,000 in March 2002, prior to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and its prohibition on loans to executive officers. Interest on such loan is payable at the applicable federal rate required to avoid imputation of income tax liability.rate. The full principal amount of such loan and all accrued interest is due and payable on February 17, 2007 (the fifth anniversary of the 2002 Stahl Grant Date), provided that if Mr. Stahl terminates his employment for "good reason"‘‘good reason’’ or the Company terminates him other than for "disability"‘‘disability’’ or "cause"‘‘cause’’ (as each such term is defined or described in Mr. Stahl's employment agreement), the outstanding balance of such loan and all accrued interest would be forgiven. Such loan is secured by a pledge of the 1,000,000 shares of restricted stock which were granted to Mr. Stahl on the 2002 Stahl Grant Date and such loan and pledge are evidenced by a Promissory Note and a Pledge Agreement, each dated March 13, 2002. Mr. Stahl's employment agreement also provides that he iswas entitled to a mortgage loan to cover the purchase of a principal residence in the New York metropolitan area and/or a Manhattan apartment, in the principal amount of $2,000,000, which loan was advanced by Products Corporation to Mr. Stahl on May 20, 2002, prior to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The principal of the mortgage loan is repayable on a monthly basis during the period from June 1, 2002 through and including May 1, 2032, with interest at the applicable federal rate, with the unpaid principal and accrued and unpaid interest due in full 90 days after Mr. Stahl's employment with the Company terminates, whichever occurs earlier. Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Stahl is entitled to receive additional compensation payable on a monthly basis equal to the amount repaid by him in respect of interest and principal on the mortgage loan, plus a gross up for any taxes resulting from such additional compensation. If during the term of his employment agreement Mr. Stahl terminates his employment for "good‘‘good reason,"’’ or the Company terminates his employment other than for "disability"‘‘disability’’ or "cause"‘‘cause’’ (as each such term is defined or described in Mr. Stahl's employment agreement), the mortgage loan from the Company would be forgiven in its entirety.

Mr. Stahl's employment agreement was amended on December 17, 2004 to extend the term of his agreement to February 16, 2008 and to provide for continued vesting of equity awards previously granted to Mr. Stahl in the event that he is terminated by the Company without "cause"‘‘cause’’ or if Mr. Stahl terminates his employment for "good reason"‘‘good reason’’ (as each such term is defined or described in Mr. Stahl's employment agreement). Specifically, in the event that Mr. Stahl wasis terminated without "cause"‘‘cause’’ or if he terminated his employment for "good‘‘good reason,"’’ the stock option awards granted to Mr. Stahl by the Company on February 17, 2002, May 19, 2003 and April 14, 2004, and the restricted stock awards granted to Mr. Stahl on February 17, 2002 and April 14, 2004, would continue to vest in accordance with their terms as if Mr. Stahl's employment had not been terminated and he had remained employed by the Company, and those stock option awards shall remain exercisable until the later of (i) one year after such existing option award becomes 100% fully vested and exercisable or (ii) 18 months following Mr. Stahl's termination of employment, but in no event beyond the original option term of each such award; provided, however, that in the event ofas consideration for continued vesting of any option awards or restricted stock awards, as described above, the

non-solicitation and non-competition covenants in Mr. Stahl's employment agreement shall remain in effect at least until the date that all existing equity awards are fully vested.

Mr. McGuire's employment agreement with Products Corporation, as amended (as so amended, his "employment agreement"‘‘employment agreement’’), provides that he will serve as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer through early March 2006 and then as Executive Vice President and President of the Company's international operations, or such other duties and responsibilities as may be assigned to him from time to time, at a base salary of not less than $500,000 per annum and that he receive a (i) retention incentive of $600,000 to be(which was paid not later than December 31, 2004 (which payment was made on January 13, 2005) intended to assist him in purchasing a home in the New York metropolitan area, and (ii) grant of (A) 50,000 shares of restricted stock in 2003 (which grant was made on the 2003 McGuire Grant Date), (B) 100,000 options in 2003 (which grant was made on the 2003 McGuire Grant Date), (C) 25,000 options in 2004 (which grant was made on April 14, 2004) and (D) 25,000 options in 2005. The term of2005 (which grant was made on March 7, 2005). Products Corporation may terminate Mr. McGuire's employment agreement ends on August 17, 2006.effective two years after written notice of non-extension of the agreement. During any period that his employment continues after August 17, 2006,termination or expiration of the term of his employment agreement, Mr. McGuire would be deemed an employee at will and would be eligible for severance under Products Corporation's Executive Severance Policy (see "— ‘‘—Executive Severance Policy"Policy’’), provided that the Severance Period for Mr. McGuire shall not be less than 24 months.

Mr. McGuire's employment agreement provides for participation in the Executive Bonus Plan and other executive benefit plans on a basis equivalent to other senior executives of the Company generally.bonus plan with specific bonus targets. The employment agreement for Mr. McGuire also provides for protection of Company confidential information and includes a non-compete obligation.

Mr. McGuire's employment agreement provides that in the event of termination of the term by Mr. McGuire for material breach by the Company of a material provision of such agreement or failure of the Compensation Committee to adopt and implement the recommendations of management with respect to stock option or restricted stock grants to be provided under his employment agreement, or by the Company (otherwise than for "cause"‘‘cause’’ as defined in Mr. McGuire's employment agreement or disability), Mr. McGuire would be entitled, at his election, to severance, including participation in the Company's medical plans, pursuant to the Executive Severance Policy (see "— ‘‘—Executive Severance Policy"Policy’’) (provided that the Severance Period for Mr. McGuire shall not be less than 24 months) or continued payments of base salary through August 17, 2006throughout the term and continued participation in the Company's life insurance plan, which life insurance coverage is subject to a limit of two years, and medical plans, subject to the terms of such plans through August 17, 2006throughout the term or until Mr. McGuire were covered by like plans of another company.

Mr. McGuire's original employment agreement provided that Mr. McGuire was eligible for certain relocation and retention benefits with the expectation that he would sell his home in Atlanta by August 18, 2004 and complete his relocation to New York by October 18, 2004. Due to the significant time that Mr. McGuire spent on the Company's refinancing and debt reduction activities during 2004, which did not permit Mr. McGuire to pursue his relocation, the employment agreement was amended in December 2004 to allow Mr. McGuire until August 18, 2005 to sell his home in Atlanta, until October 18, 2005 to complete his relocation to the New York metropolitan area and to extend the period that Products Corporation's would provide him with reasonable corporate housing until December 31, 2004.

Mr. Greeff ceased employment with the Company during February 2005 pursuant to the terms of a separation agreement between Products Corporation and Mr. Greeff, dated as of February 18, 2005 (the "Greeff Separation Agreement"). Under the Greeff Separation Agreement, Mr. Greeff will receive severance pay and benefits substantially in accordance with the terms provided in hisKretzman's employment agreement with Products Corporation, as amended (as so amended, his "employment agreement"). Mr. Greeff's (his ‘‘employment agreement had providedagreement’’) provides that he wouldwill serve as Executive Vice President, – Strategic FinanceChief Legal Officer and General Counsel at a base salary of not less than $650,000 per annum and that he would receive a grant of (i) 50,000 shares of restricted stock in 2001 (which granthis current base salary, which for 2005 was made on June 18, 2001), (ii) 50,000 options in 2001 (which grant was made on March 26, 2001) and (iii) 50,000 options in 2002 (which grant was made on February 15, 2002).$529,000. Products Corporation may terminate Mr. Greeff'sKretzman's employment agreement effective two years after written notice of non-extension of the agreement. During any period that his employment continues after the termination or expiration of the term of his employment agreement, Mr. Kretzman would be deemed an employee at will and would be eligible for severance under Products Corporation's Executive Severance Policy (see ‘‘—Executive Severance Policy’’), provided that the severance period for Mr. Kretzman shall not be less than 24 months.

Mr. Kretzman's employment agreement provides for participation in the Executive Bonus Planexecutive bonus plan and other executive benefit plans on a basis equivalent to other senior executives of the Company generally andgenerally. Mr. Kretzman's employment agreement provides for Company-paid supplemental disability insurance.term life insurance coverage of two times Mr. Kretzman's base salary. In addition, Mr. Kretzman's employment agreement provides that he is entitled to receive a retirement benefit at age 62, calculated under the Retirement Plan and Pension Equalization Plan (each as defined below), as if Mr. Kretzman had elected retirement at age

65. The employment agreement for Mr. GreeffKretzman also providedprovides for protection of Company confidential information and includedincludes a non-compete obligation.

Mr. Greeff's employmentKretzman's agreement providedprovides that in the event of termination of the term of the employment agreement by Mr. GreeffKretzman for breach by the Company of a material provision of suchhis employment agreement, or failure of the Compensation Committee to adopt and implement the recommendations of management with respect to stock option or restricted stock grants to be provided under his employment agreement or for ‘‘good reason’’ (as defined in Mr. Kretzman's employment agreement), or by the Company prior to December 31, 2006 (otherwise than for "cause"‘‘cause’’ as defined in Mr. Greeff'sthe employment agreement or for disability), Mr. GreeffKretzman would be entitled, at his election, to 24 months severance payand benefits continuation pursuant to the Executive Severance Policy (see "— ‘‘—Executive Severance Policy"Policy’’) (other(provided that the Severance Period for Mr. Kretzman shall not be less than the six-month limit on lump sum payments provided for in the Executive Severance Policy, which six-month limit provision would not apply to Mr. Greeff)24 months) or continued payments of base salary through December 31, 2006throughout the term and continued participation in the Company's life insurance plan, (which life insurance coverage is subject to a limit of two years)years, and medical plans, subject to the terms of such plans, through December 31, 2006throughout the term or until Mr. GreeffKretzman were covered by like plans of another company,company. Mr. Kretzman's agreement provides for continued vesting of each of the stock option and continued Company-paid supplemental disability insurance. In addition,restricted stock awards granted to Mr. Greeff's employment agreement provided that if he remained employed by Products Corporation or its affiliates until age 62, then upon any subsequent retirement he would have been entitled to a supplemental pension benefit in a sufficient amount so that his annual pension benefit from all qualified and non-qualified pension plans of Products Corporation and its affiliates, as well as any such plans of Mr. Greeff's past employers or their affiliates (expressed as a straight life annuity), equaled $400,000. His employment agreement also provided that if Mr. Greeff's employment were to terminate on or after December 31, 2003 andKretzman prior to December 31, 2004, thenNovember 1, 2002 in the event that he would have received 36.36% of the supplemental pension benefit otherwise payable pursuant to his employment agreement and thereafter an additional 9.09% would accrue as of each December 31st on which Mr. Greeff was still employed (but in no event more than would have been payable to Mr. Greeff under the foregoing provision had he retired at age 62). Mr. Greeff would not have received any supplemental pension benefit and would have been required to reimburse the Company for any supplemental pension benefits received if he were to breach the employment agreement or beis terminated by the Company for "cause" (as defined in Mr. Greeff's employment agreement). Mr. Greeff's employment agreement provided for continuation of group life insurance and executive medical insurance coverage in the event of permanent disability.

Mr. Greeff's employment agreement provided that he was entitled to the 2000 Loan from Products Corporation, in the amount of $800,000 (which loan he received in 2000, prior to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and its prohibition on loans to executive officers), with the principal to be payable in five equal installments of $160,000, plus interest at the applicable federal rate, on each of May 9, 2001, May 9, 2002, May 9, 2003, May 9, 2004 (which installments were each repaid) and May 9, 2005, provided that the total principal amount of such loan and any accrued but unpaid interest at the applicable federal rate (the "Loan Payment") was due and payable upon the earlier of the January 15th immediately following the termination of Mr. Greeff's employment for any reason,without ‘‘cause’’ or May 9, 2005. In addition, Mr. Greeff's employment agreement provided that he was entitled to a special bonus, payable on each May 9th (which special bonus was paid on May 9, 2001, May 9, 2002, May 9, 2003 and May 9, 2004) and ending with May 9, 2005, equal to the sum of the Loan Payment with respect to such year, provided that he remained employed on each such May 9th, and provided further that in the event that Mr. Greeff terminated his employment for "good reason" or was terminated for a reason other than "cause" (as such terms are defined in Mr. Greeff's employment agreement), he would be entitled to a special bonus in the amount of $800,000 minus the sum of any special bonuses paid through the date of such termination plus accrued but unpaid interest at the applicable federal rate. Pursuant to the Greeff Separation Agreement, Mr. Greeff is scheduled to make the Loan Payment by May 9, 2005 and receive a special bonus in an equivalent amount on such date. Notwithstanding the above, the employment agreement provided that if Mr. Greeff was to terminate his employment other than for "good reason" or the Company were to terminate his employment for "cause" (as such terms are defined in Mr. Greeff's employment agreement), or if he breached certain post-employment covenants, any bonus described above would be forfeited or repaid by Mr. Greeff, as the case may be. Mr. Greeff's employment agreement also provided that he was eligible to receive a payment of not less than $1.0 million, subject to approval by the Compensation Committee, upon the completion of objectives relating to the Company's long-term financings, provided that Mr. Greeff remained employed at such time. Pursuant to the terms of his separation agreement andKretzman terminates his employment agreement in March 2005 Mr. Greeff will receive a payment of $1.0 million in respect of

2004 in recognition of the successful completion of the Revlon Exchange Transactions and the refinancing of Products Corporation's 2001 Credit Agreement with the 2004 Credit Agreement during 2004.

The Greeff Separation Agreement provides that he will receive all of the compensation and benefits provided for in his employment agreement, including salary continuation payments through December 31, 2006, which, unless in its reasonably exercised discretion the Company decides otherwise, will be reduced on account of any compensation earned by Mr. Greeff from employment or consulting services. In addition, pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement and in accordance with the terms of the Company's Executive Bonus Plan, the Greeff Separation Agreement provides that Mr. Greeff is entitled to a bonus in respect of 2004 under the Executive Bonus Plan, based upon the extent, if any, of achievement of objective performance-based criteria established by the Compensation Committee during 2004.its terms. Such a bonus, in the amount of $133,500, will be paid to Mr. Greeff in March 2005. In accordance with the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Greeff will also be entitled to continue his existing medical/dental benefits, disability and life insurance until the end of the severance period or December 31, 2006 or, in the case of medical/dental benefits, until such earlier date he becomes eligible for coverage under like plans of another employer.

The Greeff Separation Agreement further provides, pursuant to the terms of Mr. Greeff's employment agreement, that each of Mr. Greeff's existing stock option grants willawards would continue to vest in accordance with their respective terms and remain exercisable foruntil one year following the later of: (i) Mr. Kretzman's termination of employment or (ii) the date eachall such grant becomesawards became 100% fully vested and exercisable or the date Mr. Greeff ceased to be employed by the Company. Pursuant to the Greeff Separation Agreement, Mr. Greeff received an award of options to acquire 240,000 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock, which options have a term of 7 years and vest in 25% increments per year, with the grant continuing to remain exercisable for one year following the date such grant becomes fully vested, which grant was made upon the recommendation of the Company and the approval of the Compensation Committee in February 2005. Also under the Greeff Separation Agreement, the 60,000 shares of restricted stock awarded to Mr. Greeff on the 2002 Greeff Grant Date, which were due to vest on September 17, 2005 had Mr. Greeff remained employed by the Company, will continue to vest in accordance with their terms.exercisable.

Executive Severance Policy

Products Corporation's Executive Severance Policy as in effect on December 31, 2005 provides that upon termination of employment of eligible executive employees, including Messrs. Stahl, McGuire and Greeff,Kretzman, other than voluntary resignation by the executive or termination by Products Corporation for ‘‘good reason,’’ in consideration for the executive's execution of a release and confidentiality agreement and the Company's standard employee non-competition agreement, the eligible executive may be entitledeligible to receive, in lieu of severance under any employment agreement then in effect or under Products Corporation's basic severance plan, a number of months of severance pay in bi-weekly installments based upon such executive's grade level and years of service, reduced by the amount of any compensation from subsequent employment, unemployment compensation or statutory termination payments received by such executive during the severance period and, in certain circumstances, by the actuarial value of enhanced pension benefits received by the executive, as well as continued participation in medical and certain other benefit plans for the severance period (or in lieu thereof, upon commencement of subsequent employment, a lump sum payment equal to the then present value of 50% of the amount of base salary then remaining payable through the balance of the severance period, generally capped at six months pay and subject to any restrictions under the Code). Pursuant to the Executive Severance Policy, upon meeting the conditions set forth in such policy, as of December 31, 2004,2005, Messrs. Stahl, McGuire and McGuireKretzman could be entitled to severance pay of up to 2122, 20 and 1924 months of base salary, respectively, at the base salary rate in effect on the date of employment termination, plus continued participation in the medical and dental plans for the same respective periods on the same terms as active employees, provided that under Mr.each of Messrs. McGuire's and Kretzman's employment agreementagreements the severance period is at least 24 months and under Mr. Stahl's agreement he is entitled to 36 months' severance. TheAny compensation and benefits to which Messrs. Stahl, McGuire or Kretzman would be eligible to receive upon termination pursuant to the terms of Mr. Greeff's severance arrangements are governed bytheir employment agreements or the Greeff Separation Agreement.Executive Severance Policy would be subject to applicable restrictions of the Code, if any, including, without limitation, Internal Revenue Code Section 409A and related regulations.

Defined Benefit Plans

In accordance with the terms of the Revlon Employees' Retirement Plan (the "Retirement Plan"‘‘Retirement Plan’’), the following table shows the estimated annual retirement benefits payable (as of December 31, 2004)2005) under the non-cash balance program of the Retirement Plan (the "Non-Cash‘‘Non-Cash Balance Program"Program’’) at normal retirement age (65) to a person retiring with the indicated average compensation and years of credited service, on a straight life annuity basis, after Social Security offset, including amounts attributable

to the Revlon Pension Equalization Plan, as amended (the "Pension‘‘Pension Equalization Plan"Plan’’), as described below.

Highest Consecutive Five-Year Average Compensation During Final 10 Years ($)				Estimated Annual Straight Life Annuity Benefits At Retirement With Indicated Years Of Credited Service ($) (a)
				15				20				25				30				35
	600,000			150,525				200,700				250,875				301,050				301,050
	700,000			176,525				235,367				294,208				353,050				353,050
	800,000			202,525				270,033				337,542				405,050				405,050
	900,000			228,525				304,700				380,875				457,050				457,050
	1,000,000			254,525				339,367				424,208				500,000				500,000
	1,100,000			280,525				374,033				467,542				500,000				500,000
	1,200,000			306,525				408,700				500,000				500,000				500,000
	1,300,000			332,525				443,367				500,000				500,000				500,000
	1,400,000			358,525				478,033				500,000				500,000				500,000
	1,500,000			384,525				500,000				500,000				500,000				500,000
	2,000,000			500,000				500,000				500,000				500,000				500,000
	2,500,000			500,000				500,000				500,000				500,000				500,000

Highest Consecutive Five-Year Average Compensation During Final 10 Years ($)				Estimated Annual Straight Life Annuity Benefits At Retirement With Indicated Years Of Credited Service ($) (a)
				15				20				25				30				35
600,000					150,183				200,244				250,305				300,366				300,366
700,000					176,183				234,911				293,638				352,366				352,366
800,000					202,183				269,577				336,972				404,366				404,366
900,000					228,183				304,244				380,305				456,366				456,366
1,000,000					254,183				338,911				423,638				500,000				500,000
1,100,000					280,183				373,577				466,972				500,000				500,000
1,200,000					306,183				408,244				500,000				500,000				500,000
1,300,000					332,183				442,911				500,000				500,000				500,000
1,400,000					358,183				477,577				500,000				500,000				500,000
1,500,000					384,183				500,000				500,000				500,000				500,000
2,000,000					500,000				500,000				500,000				500,000				500,000
2,500,000					500,000				500,000				500,000				500,000				500,000

(a)	The normal form of benefit for the Retirement Plan and the Pension Equalization Plan is a straight life annuity.

The Retirement Plan is intended to be a tax qualified defined benefit plan. Non-Cash Balance Program benefits are a function of service and final average compensation. The Non-Cash Balance Program is designed to provide an employee having 30 years of credited service with an annuity generally equal to 52% of final average compensation, less 50% of estimated individual Social Security benefits. Final average compensation is defined as average annual base salary and bonus (but not any part of bonuses in excess of 50% of base salary) during the five consecutive calendar years in which base salary and bonus (but not any part of bonuses in excess of 50% of base salary) were highest out of the last 10 years prior to retirement or earlier termination. Except as otherwise indicated, credited service includes all periods of employment with the Company or a subsidiary prior to retirement or earlier termination. Messrs. Stahl and McGuire do not participate in the Non-Cash Balance Program. The estimated annual benefit payable under the Non-Cash Balance Program as a single life annuity (assuming such plan participant remains employed by the Company until age 65 at his current level of compensation) is $303,700 for Mr. Kretzman.

Effective January 1, 2001, Products Corporation amended the Retirement Plan to provide for a cash balance program under the Retirement Plan (the "Cash‘‘Cash Balance Program"Program’’). Under the Cash Balance Program, eligible employees will receive quarterly credits to an individual cash balance bookkeeping account equal to 5% of their compensation for the previous quarter. Interest credits, which commenced June 30, 2001, are allocated quarterly (based on the yield of the 30-year Treasury bond for November of the preceding calendar year). Employees who as of January 1, 2001 were at least age 45, had 10 or more years of service with the Company and whose age and years of service totaled at least 60, including Mr. Kretzman, were "grandfathered"‘‘grandfathered’’ and continue to participate in the Non-Cash Balance Program under the same retirement formula described in the preceding paragraph. All other eligible employees had their benefits earned (if any) under the Non-Cash Balance Program "frozen"‘‘frozen’’ on December 31, 2000 and began to participate in the Cash Balance Program on January 1, 2001. The "frozen"‘‘frozen’’ benefits will be payable at normal retirement age and will be reduced if the employee elects early retirement. Any employee who, as of January 1, 2001 was at least age 40 but not part of the "grandfathered"‘‘grandfathered’’ group will, in addition to the "basic"‘‘basic’’ 5% quarterly pay credits, receive quarterly "transition"‘‘transition’’ pay credits of 3% of compensation each year for up to 10 years or until he/she leaves employment with the Company, whichever is earlier. Messrs. Stahl and McGuire participate in the Cash Balance Program. As they were not employed by the Company

on January 1, 2001 (the date on which a "transition"‘‘transition’’ employee was determined), Messrs. Stahl and McGuire are eligible to receive only basic pay credits. The estimated annual benefits payable under the Cash Balance Program as a single life annuity (assuming Messrs. Stahl and McGuire remain employed by the Company until age 65 at their current level of compensation) is $191,800

$137,800 for Mr. Stahl and $70,600$57,500 for Mr. McGuire. Mr. Stahl's total retirement benefits will be determined in accordance with his employment agreement, which provides for a guaranteed retirement benefit provided that certain conditions are met.

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, places certain maximum limitations upon the annual benefit payable under all qualified plans of an employer to any one individual. In addition, the Code limits the annual amount of compensation that can be considered in determining the level of benefits under qualified plans. The Pension Equalization Plan, as amended, is a non-qualified benefit arrangement designed to provide for the payment by the Company of the difference, if any, between the amount of such maximum limitations and the annual benefit that would be payable under the Retirement Plan (including the Non-Cash Balance Program and the Cash Balance Program) but for such limitations, up to a combined maximum annual straight life annuity benefit at age 65 under the Retirement Plan and the Pension Equalization Plan of $500,000. Benefits provided under the Pension Equalization Plan are conditioned on the participant's compliance with his or her non-competition agreement and on the participant not competing with Products Corporation for one year after termination of employment.

The number of full years of service under the Retirement Plan and the Pension Equalization Plan as of January 1, 20052006 for Mr. Stahl was three years, for Mr. McGuire was two years and for Mr. McGuireKretzman was one year.17 years.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

Revlon, Inc. beneficially owns all of theProduct Corporation’s 5,260 outstanding shares of common stock, par value $1.00 per share,share. As of Products Corporation.December 31, 2005, MacAndrews & Forbes, Holdings, which is wholly owned by Ronald O. Perelman, ownswho is Chairman of the Board of Directors of Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation, beneficially owned (i) 190,110,641191,685,641 shares of Revlon, Inc. Class A Common Stock (20,819,333 of which are owned by REV Holdings and 169,291,308 of which are beneficially owned by MacAndrews & Forbes (including approximately 32.6 million32,599,374 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock beneficially owned by a family member, with respect to which shares MacAndrews & Forbes holds a voting proxy))proxy, 170,000 shares that represent restricted shares which have vested and 1,525,000 shares that Mr. Perelman may acquire under vested options) and (ii) all of the outstanding 31,250,000 shares of Revlon, Inc. Class B Common Stock. Mr. Perelman also beneficially owns 1,135,417 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock that may be acquired under vested options. Based on the shares referenced in clauses (i) and (ii) above, and including Mr. Perelman's vested stock options, Mr. Perelman through MacAndrews & Forbes, at December 31, 2004,2005, beneficially owned approximately 59.9%60% of Revlon, Inc.'s outstanding shares of Revlon, Inc. Common Stock and had approximately 77.2%77% of the combined voting power of the outstanding shares of Revlon Common Stock currently entitled to vote at Revlon, Inc.'s 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. No other director, executive officer or other person beneficially owns any shares of Products Corporation's common stock. Shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock and shares of intermediate holding companies between the Company and MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings are, and may from time to time be pledged to secure obligations of MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings or its affiliates. A default under these obligations could cause foreclosure with respect to such pledged shares.

Item 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

Revlon, Inc. beneficially owns all of the 5,260 outstanding shares of common stock of Products Corporation. As of December 31, 2004, MacAndrews & Forbes beneficially owned shares of Revlon Common Stock having approximately 77.2% of the voting power of the outstanding shares of Revlon Common Stock. As a result, MacAndrews & Forbes is able to control the election of the entire Board of Directors of Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation and control the vote on all matters submitted to a vote of Revlon, Inc.'s and Products Corporation's stockholders. No other director, executive officer or other person beneficially owns any shares of Products Corporation's common stock.

In addition to Mr. Perelman, certain of Products Corporation's directors and executive officers beneficially own shares of Revlon, Inc. Class A Common Stock. The following table sets forth, as of January 1, 2006, the number of shares of Revlon, Inc. Common Stock beneficially owned, and the percent so owned, by (i) each director of Products Corporation, (ii) the Chief Executive Officer during 2005 and each of the other Named Executive Officers during 2005 and (iii) all directors and Named Executive Officers of Products Corporation as a group. The number of shares owned are those beneficially owned, as determined under the applicable rules of the SEC for the purposes of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and such information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under such rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares of Revlon, Inc. Common Stock as to which a person has sole or shared voting power or investment power and any shares of Common Stock which the person has the right to acquire within 60 days through the exercise of any option, warrant or right, through conversion of any security or pursuant to the automatic termination of a power of attorney or revocation of a trust, discretionary account or similar arrangement. Certain of the shares listed as beneficially owned are pursuant to stock options, which may be out of the money.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner				Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership				Percentage of Class
Ronald O. Perelman  35 E. 62nd St. New York, NY 10021				191,685,641 (Class A) 31,250,000 (Class B)(1)				59.74% (Class A and Class B combined) 56.06% (Class A) 100.00% (Class B)
Alan S. Bernikow				14,780 (Class A)(2)				*
Donald G. Drapkin				—				*
Robert K. Kretzman				708,420 (Class A)(3)				*
Edward J. Landau				31,789 (Class A)(4)				*
Thomas E. McGuire				586,857 (Class A)(5)				*
Barry F. Schwartz				9,380 (Class A)				*
Jack L. Stahl				4,424,416 (Class A)(6)				1.18% (Class A and Class B combined) 1.29% (Class A)
All Directors and Named Executive Officers as a Group (8 Persons)				197,461,283 (Class A) 31,250,000 (Class B)				60.63% (Class A and Class B combined) 57.08% (Class A) 100.00% (Class B)

* Less than one percent.

(1)

As described above, Mr. Perelman beneficially owns, directly and indirectly, through MacAndrews & Forbes, 191,685,641 shares of Revlon, Inc. Class A Common Stock (including 32,599,374 shares of Class A Common Stock beneficially owned by a family member, with respect to which shares MacAndrews & Forbes holds a voting proxy, 170,000 shares that represent restricted shares which have vested and 1,525,000 shares that Mr. Perelman may acquire under vested options). Mr. Perelman, through MacAndrews & Forbes, also beneficially owns all of the outstanding 31,250,000 shares of Revlon, Inc. Class B Common Stock, each of which is convertible into one share of Class A Common Stock, which, together with the Class A Common Stock referenced above, represent approximately 60% of the outstanding shares of Revlon, Inc. Common Stock and approximately 77% of the combined voting power of such shares. Shares of Class A Common Stock and shares of intermediate holding companies between Revlon, Inc. and MacAndrews & Forbes are, and may from time to time be, pledged to secure obligations of MacAndrews & Forbes. In addition, Products Corporation’s shares of common stock are pledged to secure Revlon, Inc.’s guarantee under the 2004 Credit Agreement.

(2)	Includes 14,780 shares that Mr. Bernikow may acquire under vested options.

(3)

Includes 35,000 shares that represent restricted shares that vested during 2004, 78,420 shares that represent restricted shares that vested during 2005 and 595,000 shares that Mr. Kretzman may acquire under vested options (as set forth above in Item. 11, ‘‘Executive Compensation — Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Option Values,’’ the value of Mr. Kretzman's exercisable in-the-money options at December 31, 2005 was $33,425).

(4)	Includes 134 shares held directly by Mr. Landau and 31,655 shares that Mr. Landau may acquire under vested options.

(5)	Includes 39,357 shares that represent restricted shares that vested during 2005 and 547,500 shares that Mr. McGuire may acquire under vested options (as set forth above in Item. 11, ‘‘Executive Compensation — Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Option Values,’’ the value of Mr. McGuire's exercisable in-the-money options at December 31, 2005 was $39,325).

(6)

Includes 1,601,015 shares held directly by Mr. Stahl (including 250,000 shares that represent restricted shares that vested during 2004, 900,000 shares that represent restricted shares that vested during 2005 and 250,000 restricted shares that vested on February 17, 2006), 13,401 shares held by Mr. Stahl's wife, as to which he disclaims beneficial ownership, and 2,810,000 shares that Mr. Stahl may acquire under vested options (as set forth above in Item. 11, ‘‘Executive Compensation — Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Option Values,’’ the value of Mr. Stahl's exercisable in-the-money options at December 31, 2005 was $193,700).

Item 13. Certain Relationships And Related Transactions

Revlon, Inc. beneficially owns all of Products Corporation’s 5,260 outstanding shares of common stock. As of December 31, 2005, MacAndrews & Forbes beneficially owned shares of Revlon, Inc.'s Common Stock having approximately 77% of the combined voting power of such outstanding shares. As a result, MacAndrews & Forbes is able to control the election of the entire Board of Directors of Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation and control the vote on all matters submitted to a vote of Revlon, Inc.'s and Products Corporation’s stockholders. MacAndrews & Forbes is wholly owned by Ronald O. Perelman, who is Chairman of the Board of Directors of Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation.

Transfer Agreements

In June 1992, Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation entered into an asset transfer agreement with Revlon Holdings LLC a(a Delaware limited liability company and formerly a Delaware corporation known

as Revlon Holdings Inc. ("(‘‘Revlon Holdings"Holdings’’) and which is an affiliate and an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings) and certain of itsRevlon Holdings’ wholly-owned subsidiaries, andsubsidiaries. Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation also entered into a real property asset transfer agreement with Revlon Holdings, and pursuantHoldings. Pursuant to such agreements, on June 24, 1992 Revlon Holdings transferred assets to Products Corporation and Products Corporation assumed all of the liabilities of Revlon Holdings, other than certain specifically excluded assets and liabilities (the liabilities excluded are referred to as the "Excluded Liabilities"‘‘Excluded Liabilities’’). Certain consumer products lines sold in demonstrator-assisted distribution channels considered not integral to Revlon, Inc.'s business, and that historically had not been profitable, and certain other assets and liabilities were retained by Revlon Holdings. Revlon Holdings agreed to indemnify Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation against losses arising from the Excluded Liabilities, and Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation agreed to indemnify Revlon Holdings against losses arising from the liabilities assumed by Products Corporation. The amount reimbursed by Revlon Holdings to Products Corporation for the Excluded Liabilities for 20042005 was $0.2 million.

Reimbursement Agreements

Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. (a wholly-owned subsidiary of MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings) have entered into reimbursement agreements (the "Reimbursement Agreements"‘‘Reimbursement Agreements’’) pursuant to which (i) MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. is obligated to provide (directly or through affiliates) certain professional and administrative services, including employees, to Revlon, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including Products Corporation, and purchase services from third party providers, such as insurance, legal and accounting services and air transportation services, on behalf of Revlon, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including Products Corporation, to the extent requested by Products Corporation, and (ii) Products Corporation is obligated to provide certain professional and administrative services, including employees, to MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. (and its affiliates) and purchase services from third party providers, such as insurance and legal and accounting services, on behalf of MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. (and its affiliates) to the extent requested by MacAndrews & Forbes Inc., provided that in each case the performance of such services does not cause an unreasonable burden to MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. or Products Corporation, as the case may be. Products Corporation reimburses MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. for the allocable costs of the services purchased for or provided to Products Corporation and its subsidiaries and for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the provision of such services. MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. (or such affiliates) reimburses Products Corporation for the allocable costs of the services purchased for or provided to MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. (or such affiliates) and for the reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the purchase or provision of such services. Each of Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation, on the one hand, and MacAndrews & Forbes Inc., on the other, has agreed to indemnify the other party for losses arising out of the provision of services by it under the Reimbursement Agreements other than losses resulting from its willful misconduct or gross negligence. The Reimbursement Agreements may be terminated by either party on 90 days' notice. Products Corporation does not intend to request services under the Reimbursement Agreements unless their costs would be at least as favorable to Products Corporation as could be obtained from unaffiliated third parties. Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation participate in MacAndrews & Forbes' directors and officers liability insurance program, which covers Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation as well as MacAndrews & Forbes. The limits of coverage are available on an aggregate basis for losses to any or all of the participating companies and their respective directors and officers. Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation reimburse MacAndrews & Forbes from time to time for their allocable portion of the premiums for such coverage, which the Company believes is more favorable than the premiums Products Corporation would pay were it to secure stand-alone coverage. The amounts paid by Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation to MacAndrews & Forbes for premiums is included in the amounts paid under the Reimbursement Agreement.Agreements. The net amount payable to MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. by Products Corporation for the services provided under the Reimbursement Agreements for 20042005 was $1.0$3.7 million.

Tax Sharing Agreements

As a result of the closing of the Revlon Exchange Transactions, (see "— Debt Reduction Transactions and Related Agreements — Debt Reduction Transactions"), as of the end of March 25, 2004, Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and their U.S. subsidiaries were no longer included in the MacAndrews &

Forbes Group for federal income tax purposes. The MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement will remainSee Item 7., ‘‘Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources — Sources and Uses’’ for further discussion on these agreements and related transactions in effect solely for taxable periods beginning on or after January 1, 1992, through and including March 25, 2004. In these taxable periods, Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation were included in the MacAndrews & Forbes Group, and Revlon, Inc.'s and Products Corporation's federal taxable income and loss were included in such group's consolidated tax return filed by MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings. Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation were also included in certain state and local tax returns of MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings or its subsidiaries. In June 1992, Revlon Holdings, Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries, and MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings entered into a tax sharing agreement (as subsequently amended and restated, the "MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement"), pursuant to which MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings agreed to indemnify Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation against federal, state or local income tax liabilities of the MacAndrews & Forbes Group (other than in respect of Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation) for taxable periods beginning on or after January 1, 1992 during which Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation or a subsidiary of Products Corporation was a member of such group. Pursuant to the MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement, for all such taxable periods, Products Corporation was required to pay to Revlon, Inc., which in turn was required to pay to Revlon Holdings, amounts equal to the taxes that Products Corporation would otherwise have had to pay if it were to file separate federal, state or local income tax returns (including any amounts determined to be due as a result of a redetermination arising from an audit or otherwise of the consolidated or combined tax liability relating to any such period which was attributable to Products Corporation), except that Products Corporation was not entitled to carry back any losses to taxable periods ending prior to January 1, 1992. No payments were required by Products Corporation or Revlon, Inc. if and to the extent Products Corporation was prohibited under the terms of its 2004 Credit Agreement from making tax sharing payments to Revlon, Inc. The 2004 Credit Agreement prohibits Products Corporation from making such tax sharing payments under the MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement other than in respect of state and local income taxes. The MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement was amended, effective as of January 1, 2001, to eliminate a contingent payment to Revlon, Inc. under certain circumstances in return for a $10 million note with interest at 12% and interest and principal payable by MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings on December 31, 2005. As a result of tax net operating losses and prohibitions under the 2004 Credit Agreement, there were no federal tax payments or payments in lieu of taxes pursuant to the MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement in respect of 2004.

Following the closing of the Revlon Exchange Transactions, Revlon, Inc. became the parent of a new consolidated group for federal income tax purposes and Products Corporation's federal taxable income and loss will be included in such group's consolidated tax returns. Accordingly, Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation entered into a new tax sharing agreement (the "Revlon Tax Sharing Agreement") pursuant to which Products Corporation will be required to pay to Revlon, Inc. amounts equal to the taxes that Products Corporation would otherwise have had to pay if Products Corporation were to file separate federal, state or local income tax returns, limited to the amount, and payable only at such times, as Revlon, Inc. will be required to make payments to the applicable taxing authorities. The 2004 Credit Agreement does not prohibit payments from Products Corporation to Revlon, Inc. to the extent required under the Revlon Tax Sharing Agreement. As a result of tax net operating losses, we expect that there will be no federal tax payments or payments in lieu of taxes by Products Corporation to Revlon, Inc. pursuant to the Revlon Tax Sharing Agreement in respect of 2004.

2003 and 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes Loans

In February 2003, MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings made available the MacAndrews & Forbes $100 million term loan to Products Corporation. In connection with the Revlon Exchange Transactions, MacAndrews & Forbes exchanged approximately $109.7 million of principal and accrued and capitalized interest outstanding under such loan (constituting all amounts outstanding thereunder) for 43,860,730 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock, upon which the loan was fully retired. (see "— Debt Reduction Transactions and Related Agreements — Certain Agreements Relating to the Debt Reduction Transactions — MacAndrews Support Agreement").

MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings also provided Products Corporation in February 2003 with the MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line of credit. As of the closing date of the Revlon Exchange

Transactions, nil was outstanding under the MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line of credit. (see
"— Debt Reduction Transactions and Related Agreements — Certain Agreements Relating to the Debt Reduction Transactions — MacAndrews Support Agreement"). As described below, the MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line of credit and the remaining availability under the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan (described below) were consolidated into the single 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit effective as

For a description of August 10, 2004.

In December 2003, Revlon, Inc.'s Board of Directors approved two loans to Products Corporation fromtransactions in 2005 with MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes Loan, to provide up to $100 million if needed, to enable the Company to continue to implement and refine its strategic plan, and the $25 million MacAndrews & Forbes Loan to provide an additional $25 million to be used for general corporate purposes. The 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes Loan and $25 million MacAndrews & Forbes Loan were consolidated into the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan. Inin connection with the Revlon Exchange Transactions, MacAndrews & Forbes exchanged approximately $38.9 million2004 loan agreements, see Item 7., ‘‘Management's Discussion and Analysis of principalFinancial Condition and capitalized interest outstanding under the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan (constituting all amounts outstanding thereunder asResults of such date) for 15,579,882 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock (see "— Debt Reduction TransactionsOperations — Financial Condition, Liquidity and Related AgreementsCapital Resources — Certain Agreements Relating to the Debt Reduction Transactions — MacAndrews Support Agreement"). As described below, the MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line of credit and the remaining availability under the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan were consolidated into the single 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit effective asCredit.’’

2005 Refinancing Transactions

For a description of August 10, 2004.

On July 9, 2004, Products Corporation andtransactions in 2005 with MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. entered into an agreement, which effective as of August 10, 2004 amended, restated and consolidated the facilities for the MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line of credit and the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan (the latter as to which, after the Revlon Exchange Transactions, the total term loan availability was $87 million) into the single 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit with availability of $152 million. The commitment under the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit reduces to $87 million as of July 1, 2005 and terminates on December 1, 2005. Loans are available under the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit if (i) the Multi-Currency Facility under Products Corporation's 2004 Credit Agreement has been substantially drawn (after taking into account anticipated needs for Local Loans (as defined in the 2004 Credit Agreement) and letters of credit), (ii) such borrowing is necessary to cause the excess borrowing base under the Multi-Currency Facility of the 2004 Credit Agreement to remain greater than $30 million, (iii) additional revolving loans are not available under the Multi-Currency Facility or (iv) such borrowing is reasonably necessary to prevent or to cure a default or event of default under the 2004 Credit Agreement. Loans under the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit bear interest (which is not payable in cash but is capitalized quarterly in arrears) at a rate per annum equal to the lesser of (a) 12.0% and (b) 0.25% less than the rate payable from time to time on Eurodollar loans under the Term Loan Facility under the 2004 Credit Agreement, which on December 31, 2004 was 8.0%, provided, that at any time that the Eurodollar Base Rate under the 2004 Credit Agreement is equal to or greater than 3.0%, the applicable rate to loans under the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit will be equal to the lesser of (x) 12.0% and (y) 5.25% over the Eurodollar Base Rate then in effect. In connection with the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit, on July 15, 2004, Revlon, Inc., Fidelity and MacAndrews & Forbes agreed to eliminate the Borrowing Limitation.

Debt Reduction Transactions and Related Agreements

Debt Reduction Transactions

On February 11, 2004, Revlon, Inc.'s Board of Directors approved, and on March 25, 2004 Revlon, Inc. consummated the Revlon Exchange Transactions, which were a series of transactions to reduce debt and strengthen the Company's balance sheet and capital structure, comprised of the Revlon Exchange Offers, Loan Conversion Transactions and Preferred Stock Transactions (each as defined below). Substantially all of the terms of the Revlon Exchange Transactions, including the exchange rates for the Revlon Exchange Offers, the Loan Conversion Transactions and the exchange of Revlon, Inc.'s Series A

preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share (the "Revlon Series A Preferred Stock"), in the Preferred Stock Transactions, were privately negotiated and agreed to with Fidelity. Such negotiations also encompassed the terms of MacAndrews & Forbes' participation and back-stop obligations (as described below). The Revlon Exchange Transactions included:

•

The Revlon Exchange Offers—Offers to exchange (the "Revlon Exchange Offers") – for Products Corporation's outstanding 8 1/8% Senior Notes and 9% Senior Notes, shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock at an exchange ratio of 400 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock or, at the option of the tendering holder, cash (subject to certain limitations and proration) in an amount equal to $830 with respect to the 8 1/8% Senior Notes and $800 with respect to the 9% Senior Notes, for each $1,000 principal amount of 8 1/8% Senior Notes and 9% Senior Notes tendered for exchange; and, for Products Corporation's outstanding 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes (together with the 8 1/8% Senior Notes and the 9% Senior Notes, the "Exchange Notes"), shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock at an exchange ratio of 300 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock or, at the option of the tendering holder, cash (subject to certain limitations and proration) in an amount equal to $620, for each $1,000 principal amount of 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes tendered for exchange (in each case, with any accrued and unpaid interest on the Exchange Notes exchangeable for, at the option of the holder thereof, cash or shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock at an exchange ratio of 400 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock for each $1,000 of accrued interest).

•

The Loan Conversion Transactions—The exchange of Revlon Class A Common Stock for outstanding amounts (including principal and interest) owing to MacAndrews & Forbes, as of the closing date of the Revlon Exchange Transactions, under the MacAndrews & Forbes $100 million term loan, the MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line of credit, the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan and approximately $24 million of certain subordinated promissory notes payable to Revlon Holdings (the "MacAndrews Advance" and, collectively with the MacAndrews & Forbes $100 million term loan, the MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line of credit and the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan, the "Conversion Loans") at an exchange ratio of 400 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock for each $1,000 of indebtedness outstanding under the MacAndrews & Forbes $100 million term loan, MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line of credit and 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan and 300 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock for each $1,000 of indebtedness outstanding under the MacAndrews Advance (the "Loan Conversion Transactions").

•

The Preferred Stock Transactions—The exchange of Revlon Class A Common Stock for all 546 shares of Revlon, Inc.'s outstanding Series A Preferred Stock (having an aggregate liquidation preference of approximately $54.6 million) at an exchange ratio of 160 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock for each $1,000 of liquidation preference outstanding and the conversion of all 4,333 shares of Revlon, Inc.'s outstanding Series B convertible preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, ("Series B Preferred Stock") into 433,333 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock in accordance with its terms (the "Preferred Stock Transactions").

The Revlon Exchange Transactions closed on March 25, 2004 as follows:

•	An aggregate of approximately $631.2 million aggregate principal amount of Exchange Notes, comprising approximately $133.8 million, $174.5 million and $322.9 million aggregate principal amount of 8 1/8% Senior Notes, 9% Senior Notes and 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes, respectively, were tendered in the Revlon Exchange Offers for an aggregate of 224,133,372 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock.

•

MacAndrews & Forbes (and in the case of (i) below, other entities related to it) exchanged, (i) in the Revlon Exchange Offers an aggregate of approximately $287.7 million aggregate principal amount (together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon) of Products Corporation's Exchange Notes (as part of the total of approximately $631.2 million aggregate principal amount of Exchange Notes exchanged in the Revlon Exchange Offers), comprising approximately $1.0 million and $286.7 million aggregate principal amount of Products Corporation's 9% Senior Notes and 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes, respectively, in exchange for an aggregate of

87,914,170 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock (including shares issued in respect of accrued interest on such notes); (ii) in the Loan Conversion Transactions an aggregate of approximately $172.7 million (including principal and accrued interest) outstanding under the Conversion Loans in exchange for an aggregate of 66,666,788 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock, comprising approximately $109.7 million outstanding under the MacAndrews & Forbes $100 million term loan in exchange for 43,860,730 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock, $38.9 million outstanding under the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan in exchange for 15,579,882 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock, and $24.1 million outstanding under the MacAndrews Advance in exchange for 7,226,176 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock; and (iii) in the Preferred Stock Transactions all 546 shares of outstanding Series A Preferred Stock for 8,736,000 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock and converted all 4,333 shares of Series B Preferred Stock into 433,333 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock. Revlon, Inc. issued an aggregate of 163,750,291 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock to MacAndrews & Forbes and other entities related to it in the Revlon Exchange Transactions. As of December 31, 2004, MacAndrews & Forbes beneficially owned 191,246,058 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock and 31,250,000 shares of Revlon Class B Common Stock, or approximately 59.9% of the outstanding shares of Revlon Common Stock (see "Part III, Item 12.   Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management").

•

Accounts and funds managed by Fidelity exchanged in the Revlon Exchange Offers approximately $195.7 million aggregate principal amount (together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon) of Exchange Notes (as part of the total of approximately $631.2 million aggregate principal amount of Exchange Notes exchanged in the Revlon Exchange Offers), in exchange for 76,873,304 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock. Included in the $195.7 million aggregate principal amount of Exchange Notes were the Fidelity Initial Notes (as hereinafter defined) (having an aggregate principal amount of approximately $155.1 million) tendered pursuant to the Fidelity Support Agreement and an additional $40.6 million aggregate principal amount of Exchange Notes, comprising, in the aggregate, approximately $77.8 million, $85.9 million and $32.1 million aggregate principal amount of 8 1/8% Senior Notes, 9% Senior Notes and 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes, respectively. As of December 31, 2004, funds and accounts managed by FMR Corp. (of which Fidelity is a wholly-owned subsidiary) beneficially held approximately 61.4 million shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock (representing approximately 16.6% of the outstanding shares of Revlon Common Stock and approximately 9.4% of the combined voting power of the Revlon Common Stock as of such date).

Certain Agreements Relating to the Debt Reduction Transactions

    Guaranty of the Exchange Notes

In connection with the Revlon Exchange Transactions, Revlon, Inc. entered into supplemental indentures pursuant to which it agreed to guarantee the obligations of Products Corporation under the indentures governing the Exchange Notes. The guarantee is subordinated in right of payment to Revlon, Inc.'s guarantee of Products Corporation's obligations under the 2004 Credit Agreement.

    Fidelity Support Agreement

In connection with the Debt Reduction Transactions, Revlon, Inc. entered into an agreement with Fidelity (as amended, the "Fidelity Support Agreement") pursuant to which Fidelity agreed to, among other things:

•

tender or cause to be tendered in the Revlon Exchange Offers, subject to the terms and conditions thereof, approximately $75.6 million aggregate principal amount of Products Corporation's outstanding 8 1/8% Senior Notes, $47.4 million aggregate principal amount of Products Corporation's outstanding 9% Senior Notes and $32.1 million aggregate principal amount of Products Corporation's outstanding 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes (collectively, the "Fidelity Initial Notes"), which notes were held by accounts and funds managed by Fidelity as of the date of the Fidelity Support Agreement, in exchange for shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock; and

•	elect to receive either cash or shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock in exchange for accrued and unpaid interest (at the applicable rate) on any Exchange Notes tendered by it in the Revlon Exchange Offers.

Pursuant to the Fidelity Support Agreement, Revlon, Inc. agreed with Fidelity, among other things, not to permit Products Corporation to have outstanding aggregate borrowings, at any time following the close of the Revlon Exchange Offers and until the termination of the Stockholders Agreement (as described below), under the MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line of credit and the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan in excess of approximately $86.7 million (the "Borrowing Limitation"). The Borrowing Limitation was eliminated in July 2004, as described below.

Pursuant to the Fidelity Support Agreement, as a condition to the exchange of Exchange Notes in the Revlon Exchange Offers and effective upon the March 25, 2004 closing of the Revlon Exchange Offers, two directors nominated by Fidelity (Messrs. Paul J. Bohan and Kenneth L. Wolfe) were appointed to Revlon, Inc.'s Board of Directors. In addition, in accordance with the terms of the Fidelity Support Agreement, Mr. Bohan was appointed to Revlon, Inc.'s Audit Committee and Mr. Wolfe was appointed to Revlon, Inc.'s Compensation Committee and Nominating Committee. Fidelity has no further rights to designate members to Revlon, Inc.'s Board of Directors. The Fidelity Support Agreement terminated upon the consummation of the Revlon Exchange Transactions on March 25, 2004.

    MacAndrews Support Agreement

In connection with the Revlon Exchange Transactions, Revlon, Inc. entered into a separate agreement with MacAndrews & Forbes (as amended, the "MacAndrews Support Agreement"), pursuant to which MacAndrews & Forbes agreed to, among other things:

•

tender or cause to be tendered in the Revlon Exchange Offers, subject to the terms and conditions thereof, approximately $1.0 million aggregate principal amount of Products Corporation's outstanding 9% Senior Notes and $284.8 million aggregate principal amount of Products Corporation's outstanding 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes (collectively with the Fidelity Initial Notes, the "Negotiated Transaction Notes"), and the aggregate outstanding principal amount of all Exchange Notes acquired by MacAndrews & Forbes prior to the expiration of the Revlon Exchange Offers, in exchange for shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock;

•	elect to receive shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock in exchange for accrued and unpaid interest (at the applicable rate) on any Exchange Notes tendered in the Revlon Exchange Offers;

•	upon the closing of the Revlon Exchange Offers, exchange all amounts outstanding (including accrued and unpaid interest) as of the date of such closing under the Conversion Loans for shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock in the Loan Conversion Transactions; and

•	upon the closing of the Revlon Exchange Offers, exchange all 546 shares of outstanding Series A Preferred Stock held by it for shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock and convert all 4,333 shares of outstanding Series B Preferred Stock held by it into shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock in the Preferred Stock Transactions.

The MacAndrews Support Agreement terminated upon consummation of the Revlon Exchange Transactions on March 25, 2004.

    2004 Investment Agreement

In furtherance of the Fidelity Support Agreement and the MacAndrews Support Agreement, on February 20, 2004, Revlon, Inc. entered into an investment agreement with MacAndrews & Forbes, which was amended in March 2004 and March 2005 (as amended, the "2004 Investment Agreement"). Pursuant to the 2004 Investment Agreement, MacAndrews & Forbes committed to undertake certain transactions with Revlon, Inc. that enabled, and will enable, the reduction of Product Corporation's indebtedness by an aggregate of $300 million between the date of the agreement and March 31, 2006, of which $109.7 million remained to be achieved as of December 31, 2004. (See "Recent Developments").

Agreements Relating to the Revlon Exchange Offers.    To the extent that a minimum of $150 million aggregate principal amount of Exchange Notes (other than the Negotiated Transaction Notes) had not been tendered in the Revlon Exchange Offers, MacAndrews & Forbes agreed to back-stop the Revlon Exchange Offers by subscribing for additional shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock, at a purchase price of $2.50 per share, to the extent of any such shortfall. Because approximately $190.3 million aggregate principal amount of Exchange Notes in excess of the Negotiated Transaction Notes was tendered in the Revlon Exchange Offers, MacAndrews & Forbes was not required to back-stop the Revlon Exchange Offers.

First Rights Offering.    In the event that MacAndrews & Forbes had purchased Revlon Class A Common Stock for cash as part of the Revlon Exchange Offers in any of the circumstances described above, Revlon, Inc. agreed to consummate a rights offering as soon as reasonably practicable after the closing of the Revlon Exchange Offers in order to provide the other pre-Exchange Transaction stockholders the pro rata opportunity to subscribe for shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock at the same $2.50 per share subscription price. Because MacAndrews & Forbes did not purchase Revlon Class A Common Stock for cash in connection with the Revlon Exchange Offers as described above, Revlon, Inc. did not conduct this first rights offering.

Second Rights Offering.    As the next step in the Company's debt reduction plan, and to the extent that Revlon, Inc. had not accomplished an aggregate of $200 million of further debt reduction following the Revlon Exchange Offers (which was to have included MacAndrews & Forbes' back-stop, if any) and the first rights offering, Revlon, Inc. agreed, prior to December 31, 2004, to consummate a second rights offering in order to provide all stockholders the pro rata opportunity to subscribe for shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock. For these purposes, $200 million of further debt reduction was to be measured by adding the aggregate principal amount of Exchange Notes tendered in the Revlon Exchange Offers (other than the Negotiated Transaction Notes), the amount of any cash contributed by MacAndrews & Forbes (other than to provide the cash consideration for the Revlon Exchange Offers) and the proceeds of the first rights offering described above. MacAndrews & Forbes had agreed to back-stop this second rights offering by agreeing to purchase all shares not subscribed for by other stockholders, thereby ensuring that the second rights offering would have been fully subscribed up to the amount necessary to meet the $200 million aggregate debt reduction target.

As a result of the $190.3 million aggregate principal amount of Exchange Notes tendered in the Revlon Exchange Offers in excess of the Negotiated Transaction Notes, the second rights offering would have been at an aggregate subscription price of only $9.7 million. Because the costs and expenses, as well as the use of organizational resources, associated with a $9.7 million rights offering would be unduly disproportionate, on March 24, 2004, the Fidelity Support Agreement, the MacAndrews Support Agreement and the 2004 Investment Agreement, relating to the debt reduction plan were each amended (the "Marchsee Item 7., ‘‘Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources — 2005 Refinancing Transactions, and — 2004 Amendments") to enable Revlon, Inc. to satisfy this remaining $9.7 million of debt reduction as part of the third stage equity offerings to occur by March 2006 as described below.

Third Stage Equity Offerings.    As the last step in the debt reduction transactions, and in order to reach an aggregate of $300 million of further debt reduction (inclusive of the debt reduction described above), Revlon, Inc. agreed to consummate further equity offerings in such amounts necessary to meet the $300 million aggregate debt reduction target by March 31, 2006. For these purposes, $300 million of further debt reduction is measured by adding the aggregate principal amount of Exchange Notes tendered in the Revlon Exchange Offers (other than the Negotiated Transaction Notes), the amount of any cash contributed by MacAndrews & Forbes (other than to provide the cash consideration for the Revlon Exchange Offers) and the proceeds of the first and the second rights offerings described above. Pursuant to the March 2004 Amendments, these third stage equity offerings will be at a minimum aggregate offering amount of $109.7 million, representing the amount necessary to meet the $300 million aggregate debt reduction target by March 31, 2006. MacAndrews & Forbes has agreed to back-stop up to $109.7 million in these additional equity offerings, thereby ensuring that the $300 million aggregate debt reduction target will be fully met. In March 2005, Revlon, Inc. and MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings amended MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings' obligation under the 2004 Investment Agreement to back-stop a $109.7 equity offering to be conducted by Revlon, Inc. by accelerating such obligation to October 31, 2005 from March 31, 2006 in the event that the 8 1/8% Senior Notes have not been refinanced

as of such date and Revlon, Inc. conducts an equity offering to affect such refinancing. The net cash proceeds, if any, received by Revlon, Inc. in the additional equity offerings will be transferred to Products Corporation to be used to reduce outstanding indebtedness (other than revolving indebtedness unless there is a corresponding commitment reduction). The terms of any such equity offerings, if necessary, will be set by the Board of Directors of Revlon, Inc. and publicly announced at the appropriate times. (See "Recent Developments").

MacAndrews & Forbes' obligations to acquire capital stock pursuant to the 2004 Investment Agreement are subject to customary conditions. The 2004 Investment Agreement cannot be amended or waived without the prior written consent of Fidelity.

Voting and Other Support.    In addition, MacAndrews & Forbes agreed to use its commercially reasonable efforts and take, or cause to be taken, all commercially reasonable actions in order to facilitate the Debt ReductionRefinancing Transactions. MacAndrews & Forbes also agreed to vote all of its shares of voting stock in favor of, or consent to, the Debt Reduction Transactions.

    Stockholders Agreement

Also in furtherance of the Fidelity Support Agreement, on February 20, 2004, Revlon, Inc. entered into the Stockholders Agreement with Fidelity pursuant to which, among other things, Revlon, Inc. agreed (i) to continue to maintain a majority of independent directors (as defined by NYSE listing standards) on the Board of Directors, as it currently does; (ii) to establish and maintain a nominating and corporate governance committee of the Board of Directors (which was formed in March 2004); and (iii) to certain restrictions with respect to Revlon, Inc.'s conducting any business or entering into any transactions or series of related transactions with any of its affiliates, any holders of 10% or more of the outstanding voting stock or any affiliates of such holders (in each case, other than its subsidiaries, including Products Corporation). The Stockholders Agreement provides that any directors nominated by Fidelity in accordance with the Fidelity Support Agreement shall be deemed to be independent for purposes of the Stockholders Agreement; nonetheless, Revlon, Inc.'s Board of Directors has determined that each of Messrs. Bohan and Wolfe (the directors nominated by Fidelity pursuant to the Fidelity Support Agreement) qualifies as independent within the meaning of Section 303A.02 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual and under Revlon, Inc.'s Board Guidelines for Assessing Director Independence and, with respect to Mr. Bohan, under Section 303A.06 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. The Stockholders Agreement will terminate at such time as Fidelity ceases to be the beneficial holder of at least 5% of Revlon, Inc.'s outstanding voting stock.’’

Other

Pursuant to a lease dated April 2, 1993 (the "Edison Lease"‘‘Edison Lease’’), Revlon Holdings leased to Products Corporation the Edison research and development facility for a term of up to 10 years with an annual rent of $1.4 million and certain shared operating expenses payable by Products Corporation which, together with the annual rent, were not to exceed $2.0 million per year. In August 1998, Revlon Holdings sold the Edison facility to an unrelated third party, which assumed substantially all liability for environmental claims and compliance costs relating to the Edison facility, and in connection with the sale Products Corporation terminated the Edison Lease and entered into a new lease with the new owner. Revlon Holdings agreed to indemnify Products Corporation through September 1, 2013 (the term of the new lease) to the extent that rent under the new lease exceeds rent that would have been payable under the terminated Edison Lease had it not been terminated. The net amount reimbursed by Revlon Holdings to Products Corporation with respect to the Edison facility for 20042005 was $0.3 million.

During 2004,2005, Products Corporation leased a small amount of space at certain facilities to MacAndrews & Forbes or its affiliates pursuant to occupancy agreements and leases, including space at Products Corporation's New York headquarters. The rent paid by MacAndrews & Forbes or its affiliates to Products Corporation for 20042005 was $0.3$0.2 million.

The 2004 Credit Agreement is and prior to the redemption of all Product Corporation's outstanding 12% Senior Secured Notes on August 23, 2004, the 12% Senior Secured Notes were, supported by, among

other things, guaranties from Revlon, Inc. and, subject to certain limited exceptions, all of the domestic subsidiaries of Products Corporation. The obligations under such guaranties are and were secured by, among other things, the capital stock of Products Corporation and, subject to certain limited exceptions, the capital stock of all of Products Corporation's domestic subsidiaries and 66% of the capital stock of Products Corporation's and its domestic subsidiaries' first-tier foreign subsidiaries. In connection with the Revlon Exchange Transactions, on February 11, 2004, Revlon, Inc. entered into supplemental indentures pursuant to which it agreed to guarantee the obligations of Products Corporation under the indentures governing ProductProducts Corporation's 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes and, prior to their redemption in April 2005, Products Corporation's 8 1/8% Senior Notes and 9% Senior Notes and 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes.

In March 2002, prior to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Products Corporation made an advance of $1.8 million to Mr. Stahl pursuant to his employment agreement, which was entered into in February 2002, for tax assistance related to a grant of restricted stock provided to Mr. Stahl pursuant to such agreement, which loan bears interest at the applicable federal rate. In May 2002, prior to the

passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Products Corporation made an advance of $2.0 million to Mr. Stahl pursuant to his employment agreement in connection with the purchase of his principal residence in the New York City metropolitan area, which loan bears interest at the applicable federal rate. Mr. Stahl repaid $135,968$147,299 of such loan during 2004.2005. Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Stahl receives from Products Corporation additional compensation payable on a monthly basis equal to the amount actually paid by him in respect of interest and principal on such $2.0 million advance, which for 20042005 was $135,968. Products Corporation also pays Mr. Stahl a gross up for any taxes payable by Mr. Stahl as a result of such additional compensation, which tax gross up amount was $69,650$68,999 in 2004.

During 2000, prior to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Products Corporation made the 2000 Loan to Mr. Greeff, an advance of $0.8 million, pursuant to his employment agreement. The 2000 Loan bears interest at the applicable federal rate and was payable in 5 equal annual installments on each of May 9, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, and on May 9, 2005. Mr. Greeff repaid $0.2 million of the 2000 Loan during 2004 and made other scheduled repayments during each of 2001, 2002 and 2003. Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Greeff was entitled to receive bonuses from Products Corporation, payable on each May 9^th commencing on May 9, 2001 and ending on May 9, 2005, in each case equal to the sum of the principal and interest on the advance repaid in respect of such year by Mr. Greeff, provided that he remained employed by Products Corporation on each such May 9^th. A bonus installment of $0.2 million was paid by Products Corporation to Mr. Greeff in May 2004. Pursuant to the terms of the Greeff Separation Agreement, as a result of the fact that Mr. Greeff ceased employment in February 2005, Mr. Greeff is scheduled to repay the remaining amount of the 2000 Loan by May 9, 2005 and Products Corporation is expected to pay the final bonus installment to Mr. Greeff on or about May 9, 2005.

During 2004,2005, Products Corporation made payments of $0.4$0.6 million to Ms. Ellen Barkin (spouse of Mr. Perelman) under a written agreement pursuant to which she provides voiceover services for certain of the Company's advertisements, which payments were competitive with industry rates for similarly situated talent.

Products Corporation employed Mr. Perelman's daughter in a marketing position through June 2004, with compensation paid for that period of 2004 of less than $60,000.

Products Corporation employed Mr. Drapkin's daughter in a marketing position through June 2004, with compensation paid for that period of 2004 of less than $60,000.

During 2004,2005, Products Corporation paid $1.0 million to a nationally-recognized security services company, in which MacAndrews & Forbes has a controlling interest, for security officer services. Products Corporation's decision to engage such firm was based upon its expertise in the field of security services, and the rates were competitive with industry rates for similarly situated security firms.

Item 14. Principal AccountantAccounting Fees and Services

AUDIT FEES

Revlon, Inc.'s Audit Committee adopted an Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy for pre-approving all permissible audit and non-audit services performed by KPMG after the final SEC rules became effective on May 6, 2003. In November 2004, Revlon, Inc.'s Audit Committee approved the Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy for 2005. The Board of Directors of Revlon, Inc., which owns 100% of the Company'sProducts Corporation's common stock, maintains an Audit Committee in accordance with applicable SEC rules and the NYSE's listing standards. In accordance with the charter of Revlon, Inc.'s Audit Committee, which is available at www.revloninc.com, Revlon, Inc.'s Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of Revlon, Inc.'s and Products Corporation'sCorporation’s independent auditors for the purpose of preparing and issuing its audit report or performing other audit, review or attest services for Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation. The independent auditors report directly to Revlon, Inc.'s Audit Committee and Revlon, Inc.'s Audit Committee is directly responsible for, among other things, reviewing in advance, and granting any appropriate pre-approvals of, (a) all auditing services to be provided by the independent auditor and (b) all non-audit services to be provided by the independent auditor (as permitted by the Exchange Act), and in connection therewith to approve all fees and other terms of engagement, as required by the applicable rules of the Exchange Act and subject to the exemptions provided for in such rules. To carry out such pre-approval responsibilities, Revlon, Inc.'s’s Audit Committee adoptedhas an Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy for pre-approving all permissible audit and non-audit services performed by KPMG afterKPMG. In 2004, the final rules became effective on May 6, 2003 covering services performed by KPMG during 2003. In February 2004, Revlon, Inc.'s Audit Committee approved an updatedthe Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy for services to be performed by KPMG during 20042005, and updated again in November 2004 with respect to such services to be performed by KPMG in 2005.October 2005, the Audit Committee approved the Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy for 2006.

The aggregate fees billed for professional services by KPMG in 20032005 and 2004 for these various services were (in millions):

Types of Fees				2004				2003
Audit Fees (a)				$	5.6			$	3.0
Audit-Related Fees					0.1				0.1
Tax Fees (b)					0.5				0.3
All Other Fees					—				—
Total Fees				$	6.2			$	3.4

(a)

In 2004, audit fees include fees for professional services rendered for the audits of (i) the financial statements, (ii) management's assessment of effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and (iii) the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Revlon, Inc. plans to include the required reports and attestations concerning its internal control over financial reporting in an amendment to its Annual Report on Form 10-K in accordance with the SEC's exemptive order in SEC Release No. 50754.

(b)	Includes $0.2 and $0.1 with respect to tax preparation and compliance fees in 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Types of Fees					2005				2004
Audit Fees				$	4.6			$	5.6
Audit-Related Fees				$	0.5			$	0.3
Tax Fees				$	0.3			$	0.5
All Other Fees					—				—
Total Fees				$	5.4			$	6.4

In the above table, in accordance with the SEC definitions and rules, "audit fees"‘‘audit fees’’ are fees the Company paid KPMG for professional services rendered for the audits of (i) the Company'sRevlon, Inc.’s and Products Corporation’s annual financial statements, (ii) management's assessment of the effectiveness of Revlon, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting, (iii) the effectiveness of Revlon, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting and (iii)(iv) the review of financial statements included in the Company'sRevlon, Inc.’s and Products Corporation's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and for services that are normally provided by the auditor in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements; "audit-related fees"‘‘audit-related fees’’ are fees

billed by KPMG for assurance and related services that are traditionally performed by the auditor, including services performed by KPMG related to employee benefit plan audits, the issuance by Products Corporation of its 9½% Senior Notes in March and August 2005, the universal shelf registration statement filed by Revlon, Inc.'s 2003 Rights Offering, with the SEC in 2005 and certain equity issuances undertaken pursuant to such shelf registration, the Revlon Exchange Transactions consummated in 2004 and attest services not required by statute or regulation; "tax fees"‘‘tax fees’’ are fees for permissible tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning; and "all‘‘all other fees"fees’’ are fees billed by KPMG to the Company for any permissible services not included in the first three categories.

During 2004, Revlon, Inc.'s2005, the Audit Committee specifically pre-approved the services performed by KPMG in connection with (i) Revlon, Inc.'s and Products Corporation's 20042005 audits, and (ii) the Debt Reduction Transactionsissuance by Products Corporation of its 9½% Senior Notes in 2004.March and August 2005 and (iii) the universal shelf registration statement filed by Revlon, Inc. with the SEC in 2005 and Revlon, Inc.’s planned $110 million rights offering being undertaken pursuant to such shelf registration. During 2003, Revlon, Inc.'s2004, the Audit Committee specifically pre-approved the services performed by KPMG in connection with (i) Revlon, Inc.'s’s and Products Corporation's 20032004 audit and (ii) Revlon, Inc.'s 2003 Rights Offering.the Debt Reduction Transactions consummated in 2004. All of the other services performed by KPMG for Revlon, Inc.the Company during 2005 and Products Corporation during 2004 and 2003 from and after May 6, 2003 (the effective date of the applicable final SEC rules) were either expressly pre-approved by Revlon, Inc.'sthe Audit Committee or were pre-approved in accordance with Revlon, Inc.'sthe Audit Committee's Pre-Approval Policy and Revlon, Inc.'sthe Audit Committee was provided with quarterlyregular updates as to the nature of such services and fees paid for such services.

Website Availability of Reports and Other Corporate Governance Information

In January 2004, Revlon, Inc., which owns 100% of the Company'sProducts Corporation common stock, adoptedmaintains a comprehensive corporate governance program, including Corporate Governance Guidelines for Revlon, Inc.'s’s Board of Directors, Revlon, Inc.'s’s Board Guidelines for Assessing Director Independence and new charters for Revlon, Inc.'s’s Audit Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Compensation and Stock Plan Committees.Committee. Revlon, Inc. maintains a corporate investor relations website, www.revloninc.com, where its stockholders and other interested persons may review, without charge, among other things, Revlon, Inc.'s corporate governance materials and certain SEC filings (such as Revlon, Inc.'s annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements, annual reports, Section 16 reports reflecting certain changes in the stock ownership of Revlon, Inc.'s’s directors and Section 16 executive officers, and certain other documents filed with the Commission), each of which are generally available on such site on the same business day as the filing date with the Commission.SEC on the SEC’s website http://www.sec.gov, as well as on Revlon, Inc.’s website http://www.revloninc.com. In addition, under the section of the website entitled, "Corporate‘‘Corporate Governance,"’’ Revlon, Inc. posts printable copies of the latest versions of its Corporate Governance Guidelines, Board Guidelines for Assessing Director Independence, charters for Revlon, Inc.'s Audit Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Compensation and Stock Plan Committee, as well as Revlon, Inc.'s and the Company'sCompany’s Code of Business Conduct, which includes Revlon, Inc.'s and the Company'sCompany’s Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers and the Audit Committee Pre-approval Policy, each of which the Company will provide in print, without charge, upon written request to Robert K. Kretzman, Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer, Revlon Inc.,Consumer Products Corporation, 237 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10017.

The business and financial materials and any other statement or disclosure on, or made available through, Revlon, Inc.'s websites shall not be considered a ‘‘free writing prospectus’’ under the SEC's Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically identified as such.

PART IV

Item 15.  Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

Item 15.		Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
(a)				List of documents filed as part of this ReportReport:

	(1)	Consolidated Financial Statements and Independent Auditors' Report included herein: See Index on page F-1.

	(2)	Financial Statement Schedule: See Index on page F-1. All other schedules are omitted as they are inapplicable or the required information is furnished in the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company or the Notes thereto.

All other schedules are omitted as they are inapplicable or the required information is furnished in the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company or the Notes thereto.

	(3)	List of Exhibits:

3.
	3.	Certificate of Incorporation and By-laws.

3.1
	3.1	Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Products Corporation, dated May 13, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Products Corporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 filed with the Commission on May 17, 2004).

3.2
	3.2	Amended and Restated By-Laws of Products Corporation dated as of June 5, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Products Corporation Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 filed with the Commission on August 14, 2002).

4.	4.	Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures.

4.1
	4.1	Credit Agreement, dated as of July 9, 2004, among Products Corporation and certain local borrowing subsidiaries, as borrowers, the lenders and issuing lenders party thereto, Citicorp USA, Inc., as term loan administrative agent, Citicorp USA, Inc. as multi-currency administrative agent, Citicorp USA, Inc., as collateral agent, UBS Securities LLC, as syndication agent, and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as sole lead arranger and sole bookrunner (the ‘‘2004 Credit Agreement’’) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.34 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Products Corporation filed with the Commission on July 13, 2004 (the "Products‘‘Products Corporation July 13, 2004 Form 8-K"8-K’’)).

4.2
	4.2	First Amendment dated February 15, 2006 to the 2004 Credit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Products Corporation filed with the Commission on February 17, 2006 (the ‘‘Products Corporation February 2006 Form 8-K’’)).

	4.3	Pledge and Security Agreement, dated as of July 9, 2004, among Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and the additional grantors party thereto, in favor of Citicorp USA, Inc., as collateral agent for the secured parties (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.35 to the Products Corporation July 13, 2004 Form 8-K).

4.3
	4.4	Intercreditor and Collateral Agency Agreement, dated as of July 9, 2004, among Citicorp USA, Inc., as administrative agent for the multi-currency lenders and issuing lenders, Citicorp USA, Inc., as administrative agent for the term loan lenders, Citicorp USA, Inc., as collateral agent for the secured parties, Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and each other loan party (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.36 to the Products Corporation July 13, 2004 Form 8-K).
4.4				Indenture, dated as of February 1, 1998, between Revlon Escrow Corp. ("Revlon Escrow") and U.S. Bank Trust National Association (formerly known as First Trust National Association), as trustee, relating to the 8 1/8% Senior Notes due 2006 (as amended, the "8 1/8% Senior Notes Indenture") (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Products Corporation filed with the Commission on April 3, 1998, File No. 333-47875 (the "Products Corporation April 1998 Form S-1 Amendment")).

4.5		First Supplemental Indenture, dated April 1, 1998, among Products Corporation, Revlon Escrow, and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee, amending the 8 1/8% Senior Notes Indenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Products Corporation April 1998 Form S-1 Amendment).
4.6				Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 11, 2004, among Products Corporation, U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee, and Revlon, Inc., as guarantor, amending the 8 1/8% Senior Notes Indenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.29 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Revlon, Inc. filed with the Commission on February 12, 2004 (the "Revlon, Inc. February 12, 2004 Form 8-K")).
4.7			4.5	Indenture, dated as of February 1, 1998, between Revlon Escrow and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee, relating to the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008 (as amended, the "8‘‘8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes Indenture"Indenture’’) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Products Corporation filed with the Commission on March 12, 1998, File No. 333-47875 (the "Products‘‘Products Corporation March 1998 Form S-1"S-1’’)).

4.8
	4.6	First Supplemental Indenture, dated March 4, 1998, among Products Corporation, Revlon Escrow, and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee, amending the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes Indenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Products Corporation March 1998 Form S-1).

4.9
	4.7	Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 11, 2004, among Products Corporation, U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee, and Revlon, Inc., as guarantor, amending the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes Indenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.31 of the Current Report on Form 8-K of Revlon, Inc. filed with the Commission on February 12, 2004 (the ‘‘Revlon, Inc. February 12, 2004 Form 8-K)8-K’’)).

4.10	4.8	Indenture, dated as of November 6, 1998,March 16, 2005, between Products Corporation and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee, relating to Products Corporation's 9%9½% Senior Notes due 2006 (as amended, the "9% Senior Notes Indenture")2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.134.12 to the QuarterlyAnnual Report on Form 10-Q10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 of Products Corporation (the ‘‘2004 Products Corporation 10-K/A’’)).

	4.9	Stock Purchase Agreement, dated February 17, 2006, between Revlon, Inc. and MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Revlon, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 1998 filed with the Commission on November 16, 1998).
4.11				First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 11, 2004, among Products Corporation, U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee, and Revlon, Inc., as guarantor, amending the 9% Senior Notes Indenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.30 of the 17, 2006 (the ‘‘Revlon, Inc. February 12, 20042006 Form 8-K)8-K’’)).

10.	10.	Material Contracts.

10.1
	10.1	Tax Sharing Agreement, dated as of June 24, 1992, among MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and certain subsidiaries of Products Corporation, as amended and restated as of January 1, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Products Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 filed with the Commission on February 25, 2002 (the "Products‘‘Products Corporation 2001 Form 10-K"10-K’’)).

10.2
	10.2	Tax Sharing Agreement, dated as of March 26, 2004, by and among Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and certain subsidiaries of Products Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Products Corporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 filed with the Commission on May 17, 2004).

10.3
	10.3	Employment Agreement, dated as of February 17, 2002, between Products Corporation and Jack L. Stahl (the "Stahl‘‘Stahl Employment Agreement"Agreement’’) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Revlon, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2002 filed with the Commission on May 15, 2002).

10.4	10.4	First Amendment to the Stahl Employment Agreement, effective as of December 17, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Revlon, Inc. filed with the Commission on December 22, 2004 (the "Revlon,‘‘Revlon, Inc. December 22, 2004 Form 8-K"8-K’’)).

10.5
	10.5	Employment Agreement, dated as of August 18, 2003, between Products Corporation and Thomas E. McGuire (the "McGuire‘‘McGuire Employment Agreement"Agreement’’) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Revlon, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 filed with the Commission on November 14, 2003 (the "Revlon, Inc. 2003 Third Quarter Form 10-Q"))2003).

10.6	10.6	Amendment to McGuire Employment Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to the Revlon, Inc. December 22, 2004 Form 8-K).

10.7
	10.7	Second Amendment to McGuire Employment Agreement, effective as of March 2, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Revlon, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed with the Commission on March 2, 2006).

	10.8	Employment Agreement, amended and restateddated as of May 9, 2000,June 10, 2002, between Products Corporation and Douglas H. Greeff (as amended, the "GreeffDavid L. Kennedy (the ‘‘Kennedy Employment Agreement"Agreement’’) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2299.1 to the QuarterlyCurrent Report on Form 10-Q8-K of Revlon, Inc. filed with the Commission on January 18, 2006).

	10.9	First Amendment to Kennedy Employment Agreement, effective March 2, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Revlon, Inc. for the quarteryear ended June 30, 2000December 31, 2005 filed with the Commission on August 14, 2000)March 2, 2006).

10.8		Amendment, dated as of June 18, 2001, to the Greeff Employment Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Products Corporation 2001 Form 10-K).
10.9		Amendment, dated as of August 18, 2003, to the Greeff Employment Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Revlon, Inc. 2003 Third Quarter Form 10-Q).
10.10				Employment Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2002, between Products Corporation and Robert K. Kretzman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Revlon, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the Commission on March 9, 2005)10, 2005 (the "Revlon,‘‘Revlon, Inc. 2004 Form 10-K"10-K’’)).

10.11
	10.11	Amended and Restated Revlon, Inc. Stock Plan (as amended the "Stock Plan"‘‘Stock Plan’’) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of Revlon, Inc. filed with the Commission on June 4, 2004, File No. 333-116160).

10.12
	10.12	Current form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under the Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Revlon, Inc. 2004 Form 10-K).

10.13
	10.13	Current form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Revlon, Inc. 2004 Form 10-K).

10.14
	10.14	Revlon, Inc. 2002 Supplemental Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of Revlon, Inc. filed with the Commission on June 24, 2002, File No. 333-91040).

10.15
	10.15	Revlon Executive Bonus Plan (Amended and Restated as of September 1, 2002) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.810.15 to the AnnualQuarterly Report on Form 10-K10-Q of Revlon, Inc.Products Corporation for the yearquarter ended December 31, 2002June 30, 2005 filed with the Commission on March 21, 2003August 9, 2005 (the "Revlon, Inc. 2002‘‘Products Corporation 2005 Second Quarter Form 10-K"10-Q’’)).

10.16
	10.16	Amended and Restated Revlon Pension Equalization Plan, amended and restated as of December 14, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Revlon, Inc. for year ended December 31, 1998 filed with the Commission on March 3, 1999).

10.17
	10.17	Executive Supplemental Medical Expense Plan Summary, dated July 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Revlon, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002 filed with the Commission on March 21, 2003 (the ‘‘Revlon, Inc. 2002 Form 10-K)10-K’’)).

10.18	10.18	Benefit Plans Assumption Agreement, dated as of July 1, 1992, by and among Revlon Holdings, Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1992 of Products Corporation filed with the Commission on March 12, 1993).

10.19
	10.19	Revlon Executive Severance Policy, as amended July 1, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Revlon, Inc. 2002 Form 10-K).

10.20		Support Agreement, dated as of February 11, 2004, between Revlon, Inc. and MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings (as amended, the "MacAndrews Support Agreement") (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Revlon, Inc. February 12, 2004 Form 8-K).
10.21		Amendment, dated as of February 20, 2004, to the MacAndrews Support Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Revlon, Inc. filed with the Commission on February 23, 2004 (the "Revlon, Inc. February 23, 2004 Form 8-K")).
10.22				Amendment, dated as of March 24, 2004, to the MacAndrews Support Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Revlon, Inc. filed with the Commission on March 26, 2004 (the "Revlon, Inc. March 26, 2004 Form 8-K")).
10.23				Support Agreement, dated as of February 11, 2004, between Revlon, Inc. and Fidelity (as amended, the "Fidelity Support Agreement") (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 of Revlon, Inc. February 12, 2004 Form 8-K).
10.24				Amendment, dated as of February 20, 2004, to the Fidelity Support Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the Revlon, Inc. February 23, 2004 Form 8-K).
10.25				Amendment, dated as of March 24, 2004, to the Fidelity Support Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the Revlon, Inc. March 26, 2004 Form 8-K).
10.26			10.20	2004 Senior Unsecured Line of Credit Agreement, , dated as of July 9, 2004, between Products Corporation and MacAndrews & Forbes (the ‘‘2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit’’) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Revlon, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 filed with the Commission on August 16, 2004).

10.27
	10.21	First Amendment, dated as of August 4, 2005, to the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the Products Corporation 2005 Second Quarter Form 10-Q).

	10.22	Second Amendment, dated as of February 17, 2006, to the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Products Corporation February 2006 Form 8-K).

	10.23	Stockholders Agreement, dated as of February 20, 2004, by and between Revlon, Inc. and Fidelity (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Revlon, Inc. filed with the Commission on February 23, 2004 (the ‘‘Revlon, Inc. February 23, 2004 Form 8-K)8-K’’)).

10.28	10.24	Investment Agreement, dated as of February 5, 2003, among Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Products Corporation filed with the Commission on February 5, 2003).

10.29
	10.25	Investment Agreement, dated as of February 20, 2004, by and between Revlon, Inc. and MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings (as amended, the "2004‘‘2004 Investment Agreement"Agreement’’) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 of the Revlon, Inc. February 23, 2004 Form 8-K).

10.30
	10.26	Amendment, dated as of March 24, 2004, to the 2004 Investment Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Revlon, Inc. filed with the Commission on March 26, 2004 Form 8-K)2004).

10.31	10.27	Second Amendment, dated as of March 7, 2005, to the 2004 Investment Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the Revlon, Inc. 2004 Form 10-K).

21.	10.28	Third Amendment, dated as of August 4, 2005, to the 2004 Investment Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Revlon, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 filed with the Commission on August 9, 2005).

		Subsidiaries.
*21.1	10.29	Fourth Amendment, dated as of February 17, 2006, to the 2004 Investment Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Revlon, Inc. February 2006 Form 8-K).

	21.	Subsidiaries.

	*21.1	Subsidiaries of Revlon Consumer Products CorporationCorporation.

24.	24.	Powers of Attorney.

	*24.1		Power of Attorney executed by Ronald O. Perelman.

	*24.2		Power of Attorney executed by Alan S. Berkinow.Bernikow.

	*24.3		Power of Attorney executed by Donald G. Drapkin.

	*24.4		Power of Attorney executed by Edward J. Landau.

	*24.5		Power of Attorney executed by Barry F. Schwartz.

	*31.1		Certification of Jack L. Stahl, Chief Executive Officer, dated March 10, 2005,2, 2006, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act.

	*31.2		Certification of Thomas E. McGuire, Chief Financial Officer, dated March 10, 2005,2, 2006, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act.

	32.1 (furnished  herewith)		Certification of Jack L. Stahl, Chief Executive Officer, dated March 10, 2005,2, 2006, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2 (furnished herewith)
	32.2  (furnished  herewith)	Certification of Thomas E. McGuire, Chief Financial Officer, dated March 10, 2005,2, 2006, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

		* Filed herewith.herewith

REVLON CONSUMER PRODUCTS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULE

				Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm							F-2
Audited Financial Statements:
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20042005 and 20032004							F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 20042005							F-4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholder's Deficiency and Comprehensive Loss for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 20042005							F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 20042005							F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements							F-7	F-8
Financial Statement Schedule:
Schedule II—II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts							F-45	F-43

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholder
Revlon Consumer Products Corporation:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholder'sstockholder’s deficiency and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004.2005. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement schedule as listed on the index on page F-1. These consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company'sCompany’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004,2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

/s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
March 9, 20051, 2006

REVLON CONSUMER PRODUCTS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(dollars in millions, except per share data)amounts)

				December 31, 2004				December 31, 2003
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents				$	120.8			$	56.5
Trade receivables, less allowances of $19.0 and $19.4 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively					200.6				182.5
Inventories					154.7				142.7
Prepaid expenses and other					67.8				46.6
Total current assets					543.9				428.3
Property, plant and equipment, net					118.7				132.1
Other assets					149.9				144.2
Goodwill, net					186.1				186.1
Total assets				$	998.6			$	890.7
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S DEFICIENCY
Current liabilities:
Short-term borrowings — third parties				$	36.6			$	28.0
Current portion of long-term debt — third parties					10.5				—
Accounts payable					95.2				97.4
Accrued expenses and other					283.2				322.0
Total current liabilities					425.5				447.4
Long-term debt — third parties					1,308.2				1,723.3
Long-term debt — affiliates					—				146.2
Other long-term liabilities					286.7				301.0
Stockholder's deficiency:
Preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share; 1,000 shares authorized, 546 shares of Series A Preferred Stock issued and outstanding					54.6				54.6
Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share; 10,000 shares as of December 31, 2004 and 1,000 shares as of December 31, 2003 authorized, respectively, and 5,260 shares as of December 31, 2004 and 1,000 shares as of December 31, 2003 issued and outstanding, respectively					—				—
Additional paid-in-capital (capital deficiency)					706.5				(152.3	)
Accumulated deficit					(1,646.1	)			(1,503.3	)
Deferred compensation					(12.5	)			(4.2	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss					(124.3	)			(122.0	)
Total stockholder's deficiency					(1,021.8	)			(1,727.2	)
Total liabilities and stockholder's deficiency				$	998.6			$	890.7

				December 31, 2005				December 31, 2004
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents				$	32.4			$	120.8
Trade receivables, less allowances of $18.9 and $19.0 as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively					282.2				200.6
Inventories					220.6				154.7
Prepaid expenses and other					61.5				67.8
Total current assets					596.7				543.9
Property, plant and equipment, net					119.7				118.7
Other assets					146.0				149.9
Goodwill, net					186.0				186.1
Total assets				$	1,048.4			$	998.6
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S DEFICIENCY
Current liabilities:
Short-term borrowings — third parties				$	9.0			$	36.6
Current portion of long-term debt — third parties					—				10.5
Accounts payable and outstanding checks					133.1				95.2
Accrued expenses and other					328.4				283.2
Total current liabilities					470.5				425.5
Long-term debt — third parties					1,413.4				1,308.2
Other long-term liabilities					255.7				286.7
Stockholder’s deficiency:
Preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share; 1,000 shares authorized, 546 shares of Series A Preferred Stock issued and outstanding					54.6				54.6
Common stock, par value $1.00 per share; 10,000 shares authorized and 5,260 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively					—				—
Additional paid-in capital					706.3				706.5
Accumulated deficit					(1,723.9	)			(1,646.1	)
Deferred compensation					(6.5	)			(12.5	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss					(121.7	)			(124.3	)
Total stockholder’s deficiency					(1,091.2	)			(1,021.8	)
Total liabilities and stockholder’s deficiency				$	1,048.4			$	998.6

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements

REVLON CONSUMER PRODUCTS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(dollars in millions)millions, except per share amounts)

				Year Ended December 31,
				2004				2003				2002
Net sales				$	1,297.2			$	1,299.3			$	1,119.4
Cost of sales					485.3				501.1				503.7
Gross profit					811.9				798.2				615.7
Selling, general and administrative expenses					716.4				769.7				711.1
Restructuring costs and other, net					5.8				6.0				13.6
Operating income (loss)					89.7				22.5				(109.0	)
Other expenses (income):
Interest expense					130.8				174.5				159.0
Interest income					(3.1	)			(2.7	)			(2.1	)
Amortization of debt issuance costs					8.2				8.9				7.7
Foreign currency (gains) losses, net					(5.2	)			(5.0	)			1.4
Loss on sale of brand and facilities, net					—				—				1.0
Loss on early extinguishment of debt					90.7				—				—
Miscellaneous, net					2.0				0.5				1.2
Other expenses, net					223.4				176.2				168.2
Loss before income taxes					(133.7	)			(153.7	)			(277.2	)
Provision for income taxes					9.1				0.3				4.6
Net loss				$	(142.8	)		$	(154.0	)		$	(281.8	)

				Year Ended December 31,
				2005				2004				2003
Net sales				$	1,332.3			$	1,297.2			$	1,299.3
Cost of sales					508.1				485.3				501.1
Gross profit					824.2				811.9				798.2
Selling, general and administrative expenses					750.2				716.4				769.7
Restructuring costs and other, net					1.5				5.8				6.0
Operating income					72.5				89.7				22.5
Other expenses (income):
Interest expense					130.0				130.8				174.5
Interest income					(3.9	)			(3.1	)			(2.7	)
Amortization of debt issuance costs					6.9				8.2				8.9
Foreign currency (gains) losses, net					0.5				(5.2	)			(5.0	)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt					9.0				90.7				—
Miscellaneous, net					(0.5	)			2.0				0.5
Other expenses, net					142.0				223.4				176.2
Loss before income taxes					(69.5	)			(133.7	)			(153.7	)
Provision for income taxes					8.3				9.1				0.3
Net loss				$	(77.8	)		$	(142.8	)		$	(154.0	)

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements

REVLON CONSUMER PRODUCTS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDER'SSTOCKHOLDER’S DEFICIENCY
AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(dollars in millions)

				Preferred Stock				Additional Paid-In- Capital (Capital Deficiency)				Accumulated Deficit				Deferred Compensation				Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss				Total Stockholder's Deficiency
Balance, January 1, 2002				$	54.6			$	(206.1	)		$	(1,067.5	)		$	(8.1	)		$	(61.1	)		$	(1,288.2	)
Amortization of deferred compensation																	1.7								1.7
Comprehensive loss:
Net loss													(281.8	)											(281.8	)
Adjustment for minimum pension liability																					(67.5	)			(67.5	)
Revaluation of foreign currency forward exchange contracts																					(0.1	)			(0.1	)
Currency translation adjustment																					(4.0	)			(4.0	)
Total comprehensive loss																									(353.4	)
Balance, December 31, 2002					54.6				(206.1	)			(1,349.3	)			(6.4	)			(132.7	)			(1,639.9	)
Net proceeds from 2003 Rights Offering (See Note 9)									46.9																46.9
Reduction of liabilities assumed from indirect parent									6.9	(a)															6.9
Amortization of deferred compensation																	2.2								2.2
Comprehensive loss:
Net loss													(154.0	)											(154.0	)
Adjustment for minimum pension liability																					1.5				1.5
Revaluation of foreign currency forward exchange contracts																					(1.4	)			(1.4	)
Currency translation adjustment																					10.6				10.6
Total comprehensive loss																									(143.3	)
Balance, December 31, 2003					54.6				(152.3	)			(1,503.3	)			(4.2	)			(122.0	)			(1,727.2	)
Revlon Exchange Transactions (b)									827.7																827.7
Reduction of liabilities assumed from indirect parent									16.4	(a)															16.4
Stock-based compensation									14.7								(14.7	)							—
Amortization of deferred compensation																	6.4								6.4
Comprehensive loss:
Net loss (b)													(142.8	)											(142.8	)
Adjustment for minimum pension liability																					(1.6	)			(1.6	)
Revaluation of foreign currency forward exchange contracts																					(1.3	)			(1.3	)
Currency translation adjustment																					0.6				0.6
Total comprehensive loss																									(145.1	)
Balance, December 31, 2004				$	54.6			$	706.5			$	(1,646.1	)		$	(12.5	)		$	(124.3	)		$	(1,021.8	)

				Preferred Stock				Additional Paid-In- Capital				Accumulated Deficit				Deferred Compensation				Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss				Total Stockholder’s Deficiency
Balance, January 1, 2003				$	54.6			$	(206.1	)		$	(1,349.3	)		$	(6.4	)		$	(132.7	)		$	(1,639.9	)
Net proceeds from 2003 Rights Offering (See Note 9)									46.9																46.9
Reduction of liabilities assumed from indirect parent									6.9	(a)															6.9
Amortization of deferred   compensation																	2.2								2.2
Comprehensive loss:
Net loss													(154.0	)											(154.0	)
Adjustment for minimum pension liability																					1.5				1.5
Revaluation of foreign currency forward exchange contracts																					(1.4	)			(1.4	)
Currency translation adjustment																					10.6				10.6
Total comprehensive loss																									(143.3	)
Balance, December 31, 2003					54.6				(152.3	)			(1,503.3	)			(4.2	)			(122.0	)			(1,727.2	)
Revlon Exchange Transaction (b)									827.7																827.7
Reduction of liabilities assumed from indirect parent									16.4	(a)															16.4
Stock-based compensation									14.7								(14.7	)							—
Amortization of deferred compensation																	6.4								6.4
Comprehensive loss:
Net loss (b)													(142.8	)											(142.8	)
Adjustment for minimum pension liability																					(1.6	)			(1.6	)
Revaluation of foreign currency forward exchange contracts																					(1.3	)			(1.3	)
Currency translation adjustment																					0.6				0.6
Total comprehensive loss																									(145.1	)
Balance, December 31, 2004					54.6				706.5				(1,646.1	)			(12.5	)			(124.3	)			(1,021.8	)
Stock-based compensation									(0.2	)							0.2								—
Amortization of deferred   compensation																	5.8								5.8
Comprehensive loss:
Net loss													(77.8	)											(77.8	)
Adjustment for minimum pension liability																					6.7				6.7
Revaluation of foreign currency forward exchange contracts																					2.4				2.4
Currency translation adjustment																					(6.5	)			(6.5	)
Total comprehensive loss																									(75.2	)
Balance, December 31, 2005				$	54.6			$	706.3			$	(1,723.9	)		$	(6.5	)		$	(121.7	)		$	(1,091.2	)

(a)

During 2003, the Company resolved various tax audits, which resulted in a tax benefit of $13.9 of which $6.9 was recorded directly to capital deficiency since it relates to liabilities assumed by Revlon Consumer Products Corporation in connection with the transfer agreements related to Revlon Consumer Products Corporation's formation in 1992. During 2004, the Company resolved various state and federal tax audits and determined that certain tax liabilities assumed by Revlon Consumer Products Corporation in connection with transfer agreements related to Revlon Consumer Products Corporation's formation in 1992 were no longer probable. As a result, $16.4 was recorded directly to capital deficiency. (See Note 15)15, ‘‘Related Party Transactions’’).

(b)	The changechanges in Preferred Stock, Common Stock, Additional Paid-in-Capital (Capital Deficiency) and a portion of Accumulated Deficit are a result of the consummation of the Revlon Exchange Transactions. (See Note 9)9, ‘‘Long-Term Debt’’).

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements

REVLON CONSUMER PRODUCTS CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(dollars in millions)

				December 31,
				2005				2004				2003
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss				$	(77.8	)		$	(142.8	)		$	(154.0	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization					102.9				106.1				107.6
Amortization of debt discount					0.2				1.8				3.1
Stock compensation amortization					5.8				6.4				2.2
Loss on early extinguishment of debt					9.0				77.3				—
Change in assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in trade receivables					(86.5	)			(12.1	)			40.2
Increase in inventories					(69.8	)			(7.8	)			(5.7	)
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets					(3.3	)			(7.7	)			1.1
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable					22.0				(4.4	)			0.5
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other current liabilities					12.9				(31.7	)			(79.6	)
Purchase of permanent displays					(69.6	)			(56.0	)			(72.9	)
Other, net					14.5				(23.3	)			(8.9	)
Net cash used in operating activities					(139.7	)			(94.2	)			(166.4	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures					(25.8	)			(18.9	)			(28.6	)
Investment in debt defeasance trust					(197.9	)			—				—
Liquidation of investment in debt defeasance trust					197.9				—				—
Payment received on note from parent					10.0				—				—
Proceeds from the sale of brand and certain assets					—				—				5.3
Net cash used in investing activities					(15.8	)			(18.9	)			(23.3	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings and overdraft — third parties					(8.8	)			6.0				(1.6	)
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt — third parties					386.2				1,136.2				233.1
Repayment of long-term debt — third parties, including prepayment fee and premiums					(297.9	)			(960.2	)			(239.3	)
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt — affiliates					—				42.4				178.1
Repayment of long-term debt — affiliates					—				(19.5	)			(62.6	)
Capital Contribution from direct parent					—				—				46.9
Payment of financing costs					(12.0	)			(30.4	)			(3.5	)
Net cash provided by financing activities					67.5				174.5				151.1
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents					(0.4	)			2.9				9.3
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents					(88.4	)			64.3				(29.3	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period					120.8				56.5				85.8
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period				$	32.4			$	120.8			$	56.5

REVLON CONSUMER PRODUCTS CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(dollars in millions)

				December 31,
				2005				2004				2003
Supplemental schedule of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest				$	123.5			$	133.9			$	160.8
Income taxes, net of refunds				$	17.9			$	11.1			$	6.7
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Conversion of long-term debt and accrued interest into Class A Common Stock				$	—			$	813.8			$	—
Reduction of liabilities assumed from indirect parent				$	—			$	16.4			$	6.9

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

REVLON CONSUMER PRODUCTS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(dollars in millions)

				Year Ended December 31,
				2004				2003				2002
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss				$	(142.8	)		$	(154.0	)		$	(281.8	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used for operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization					106.1				107.6				114.6
Amortization of debt discount					1.8				3.1				2.6
Stock compensation amortization					6.4				2.2				1.7
Loss on early extinguishment of debt					77.3				—				—
Loss on sale of brand and certain assets, net					—				—				1.0
Change in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions and dispositions:
(Increase) decrease in trade receivables					(12.1	)			40.2				(9.4	)
(Increase) decrease in inventories					(7.8	)			(5.7	)			30.3
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets					(7.7	)			1.1				(2.2	)
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable					(4.4	)			0.5				6.3
(Decrease) increase in accrued expenses and other current liabilities					(31.7	)			(79.6	)			98.2
Purchase of permanent displays					(56.0	)			(72.9	)			(66.2	)
Other, net					(23.3	)			(8.9	)			(7.4	)
Net cash used for operating activities					(94.2	)			(166.4	)			(112.3	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures					(18.9	)			(28.6	)			(16.0	)
Sale of marketable securities					—				—				1.8
Proceeds from the sale of brand and certain assets					—				5.3				—
Net cash used for investing activities					(18.9	)			(23.3	)			(14.2	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings — third parties					6.0				(1.6	)			8.0
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt — third parties					1,136.2				233.1				175.6
Repayment of long-term debt — third parties, including premiums					(960.2	)			(239.3	)			(73.0	)
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt — affiliates					42.4				178.1				—
Repayment of long-term debt — affiliates					(19.5	)			(62.6	)			—
Net proceeds from the 2003 Rights Offering					—				46.9				—
Payment of financing costs					(30.4	)			(3.5	)			(0.3	)
Net cash provided by financing activities					174.5				151.1				110.3
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents					2.9				9.3				(1.3	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents					64.3				(29.3	)			(17.5	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period					56.5				85.8				103.3
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period				$	120.8			$	56.5			$	85.8
Supplemental schedule of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest				$	133.9			$	160.8			$	155.2
Income taxes, net of refunds					11.1				6.7				3.6
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities:
Conversion of long-term debt and accrued interest in connection with the Debt Reduction Transactions				$	813.8			$	—			$	—
Reduction of liabilities assumed from indirect parent					16.4				6.9				—

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

REVLON CONSUMER PRODUCTS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollarsall tabular amounts in millions, except per share data)amounts)

1.    Significant Accounting Policies

1.	SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation:

Revlon Consumer Products Corporation ("(‘‘Products Corporation"Corporation’’ and together with its subsidiaries, the "Company"‘‘Company’’), which is a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Revlon, Inc., was formed in April 1992. The Company manufactures and sells an extensive array of cosmetics, and skin care,skincare, fragrances, beauty tools and personal care products. The Company's principal customers include large mass volume retailers and chain drug stores, as well as certain department stores and other specialty stores, such as perfumeries. The Company also sells consumer products to U.S. military exchanges and commissaries and has a licensing group.group, pursuant to which the Company licenses certain of its key brand names to third parties for complimentary beauty-related products and accessories.

Products Corporation is a direct wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary of Revlon, Inc., which is an indirectlyindirect majority-owned subsidiary of MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings Inc., formerly known as Mafco Holdings Inc., a corporation wholly owned by Ronald O. Perelman (" (‘‘MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings"Holdings’’ and, together with its affiliates, "MacAndrews‘‘MacAndrews & Forbes"Forbes’’)., a corporation wholly-owned by Ronald O. Perelman.

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company after elimination of all material intercompany balances and transactions. Further, the Company has made a number

The preparation of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of liabilities and the reporting of revenues and expenses to prepare these financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted accounting principles.in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. Actual results could differ from thosethese estimates.

Certain amounts Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically and the effects of revisions are reflected in the prior yearconsolidated financial statements have been reclassifiedin the period they are determined to conformbe necessary. Significant estimates made in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include, but are not limited to, allowances for doubtful accounts, inventory valuation reserves, expected sales returns and allowances, certain assumptions related to the current year's presentation.recoverability of intangible and long-lived assets, reserves for estimated tax liabilities, and certain estimates regarding the calculation of the net periodic benefit costs and the projected benefit obligation for the Company’s pension and other post-retirement plans.

Cash and Cash Equivalents:

Cash equivalents are primarily investments in high-quality, short-term money market instruments with original maturities of three months or less and are carried at cost, which approximates fair value. Cash equivalents were $9.7 million and $79.0 and $30.6million as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Accounts payable includes $18.2 million and 2003,$4.4 million of outstanding checks not yet presented for payment at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

In accordance with borrowing arrangements with certain financial institutions, the CompanyProducts Corporation is permitted to borrow against its cash balances. The unrestricted cash available to the CompanyProducts Corporation is the net of the cash position less amounts supporting these short-term borrowings. The cash balances and related borrowings are shown gross in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, the Company had $3.2 million and $36.2 and $27.9,million, respectively, of cash supporting such short-term borrowings. (See Note 8, to the Consolidated Financial Statements)‘‘Short-Term Borrowings’’).

Accounts Receivable:

Accounts receivable represent payments due to the Company for previously recognized net sales, reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts for balances, which are estimated to be uncollectible at December 31, 20042005 and 2003.2004. The Company grants credit terms in the normal course of business to its customers. Trade credit is extended based upon periodically updated evaluations of each customer's

ability to perform its obligations. The Company does not normally require collateral or other security to support credit sales. The allowance for doubtful accounts is determined based on historical experience and ongoing evaluations of the Company's receivables and evaluations of the risks of payment. Accounts receivable balances are recorded against the allowance for doubtful accounts when they are deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of accounts receivable previously recorded against the allowance are recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations when received. At both December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, the Company's three largest customers accounted for an aggregate of approximately 43% and 37% of outstanding accounts receivable.

Inventories:

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is principally determined by the first-in, first-out method.

Property, Plant and Equipment and Other Assets:

Property, plant and equipment is recorded at cost and is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of such assets as follows: land improvements, 20 to 40 years; buildings and improvements, 5 to 45 years; machinery and equipment, 3 to 17 years; and office furniture and fixtures and capitalized software, 2 to 12 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over their estimated useful lives or the terms of the leases, whichever is shorter. Repairs and maintenance are charged to operations as incurred, and expenditures for additions and improvements are capitalized.

Long-lived assets, including fixed assets and intangibles other than goodwill, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable, the Company estimates the undiscounted future cash flows (excluding interest) resulting from the use of the asset and its ultimate disposition. If the sum of the undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest) is less than the carrying value, the Company recognizes an impairment loss, measured as the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the asset.

Included in other assets are net permanent wall displays amounting to approximately $91.4 million and $94.2 and $98.6million as of December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively, which are generally amortized over 3 years in the U.S. and generally over 3 to 5 years. Beginning inyears outside of the first quarter of 2002, the Company decided to roll out newU.S. Amortization expense for permanent wall displays replacing existing permanent wall displays at an accelerated rate. As a result, the useful lives of those permanent wall displays to be replaced were shortened to their new estimated useful lives, resulting in accelerated amortization of approximately $11 during 2002. The cost of the new wall displays will be amortized over a 3-year life.for 2005, 2004 and 2003 was $70.4 million, $60.9 million and $62.1 million, respectively. The Company has included in other assets net costs related to the issuance of itsProducts Corporation’s debt instruments amounting to approximately $33.9 million and $31.6 and $23.0million as of December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively, which are amortized over the terms of the related debt instruments. In addition, the Company has included in other assets trademarks, net, of $8.1 million and $7.8 and $7.5million as of December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively, and patents, net, of $2.3 million and $3.2 and $3.9million as of December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively. Patents and trademarks are recorded at cost and amortized ratably over approximately 10 to 17 years. Amortization expense for patents and trademarks for 2005, 2004 and 2003 was $2.0 million, $1.8 million and 2002 was $1.8 $1.8 and $2.0,million, respectively. The Company's intangible assets other than goodwill continue to be subject to amortization, which is anticipated to be approximately $1.6 annually through December 31, 2009.

Intangible Assets Related to Businesses Acquired:

Intangible assets related to businesses acquired principally represent goodwill, which represents the excess purchase price over the fair value of assets acquired. In July 2001, the FASB issued Statement No. 141, "Business Combinations", and Statement No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets". Statement 141 requires that the purchase method of accounting be usedThe Company accounts for all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001, as well as all purchase method business combinations completed after June 30, 2001. Statement 141 also specifies criteria that must be met in order for intangible assets acquired in a purchase method business combination to be recognized and reported apart from goodwill. Statement 142 requires thatits goodwill and intangible assets in accordance with indefinite useful lives no longer be amortized, but instead testedSFAS No. 142, ‘‘Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets’’, and does not amortize its goodwill. The Company reviews its goodwill for impairment at least annually, or whenever events or changes in accordance with the provisions of Statement 142. Statement 142 requires that intangible assets with finite useful lives be amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment in accordance with Statement 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets".

The Company adopted the provisions of Statement 141 in July 2001 and Statement 142 effective January 1, 2002. In connection with the adoption of Statement 142, the Company performed a transitional goodwill impairment test as required and determined that no goodwill impairment existed at January 1, 2002.circumstances would indicate possible impairment. The Company performs its annual impairment test of goodwill as of September 30 and performed

the annual test as of September 30, 2004, 20032005 and 20022004 and concluded that no impairment existed. The Company operates in one reportable segment, which is also the only reporting unit for purposes of SFAS No. 142. Since the Company currently only has one reporting unit, all of the goodwill has been assigned to the enterprise as a whole. The Company compared its estimated fair value as measured by, among other factors, its market capitalization to its net assets and since the fair value was substantially greater than the net assets, the

Company concluded that as of December 31, 2005 there was no impairment of goodwill.

The Company has also evaluated the lives of all of its intangible assets. As a result of this evaluation, the Company has determined that none of its intangible assets, other than goodwill, have indefinite lives and that the existing useful lives are appropriate. The amount outstanding for goodwill, net, was $186.0 million and $186.1 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, and December 31, 2003.respectively. Accumulated amortization aggregated $117.2 million and $117.3 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, and 2003.respectively. Amortization of goodwill ceased on January 1, 2002 upon adoption of SFAS No. 142.

In accordance with SFAS No. 142, the Company’s intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances would indicate possible impairment in accordance with Statement 142. Prior to January 1, 2002,144, ‘‘Accounting for the Company amortized goodwill on a straight-line basis over 40 years.Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets’’.

Revenue Recognition:

Sales are recognized when revenue is realized or realizable and has been earned. The Company's policy is to recognize revenue when risk of loss and title to the product transfers to the customer. Net sales is comprised of gross revenues less expected returns, trade discounts and customer allowances, which include costs associated with off-invoice mark-downs and other price reductions, as well as trade promotions and coupons. These incentive costs are recognized at the later of the date on which the Company recognizes the related revenue or the date on which the Company offers the incentive. The Company allows customers to return their unsold products if and when they meet certain Company-established criteria as outlined in the Company's trade terms. The Company regularly reviews and revises, when deemed necessary, its estimates of sales returns based primarily upon actual returns, planned product discontinuances, new product launches, estimates of customer inventory and promotional sales, which would permit customers to return items based upon the Company's trade terms. The Company records sales returns as a reduction to sales and cost of sales, and an increase to accrued liabilities and to inventories. Returned products which are recorded as inventories are valued based upon the amount that the Company expects to realize upon their subsequent disposition. The physical condition and marketability of the returned products are the major factors considered by the Company in estimating realizable value. Actual returns, as well as realized values on returned products, may differ significantly, either favorably or unfavorably, from the Company's estimates if factors such as product discontinuances, customer inventory levels or competitive conditions differ from the Company's estimates and expectations and, in the case of actual returns, if economic conditions differ significantly from the Company's estimates and expectations. Revenues derived from licensing arrangements, including any prepayments, are recognized in the period in which they become due and payable but not before the initial license term commences.

Cost of sales includes all of the costs to manufacture the Company's products. For products manufactured in the Company's own facilities, such costs include raw materials and supplies, direct labor and factory overhead. For products manufactured for the Company by third-party contractors, such costs represent the amounts invoiced by the contractors. Cost of sales also includes the cost of refurbishing products returned by customers that will be offered for resale and the cost of inventory write-downs associated with adjustments of held inventories to net realizable value. These costs are reflected in the statement of operations when the product is sold and net sales revenues are recognized or, in the case of inventory write-downs, when circumstances indicate that the carrying value of inventories is in excess of its recoverable value. Additionally, cost of sales reflects the costs associated with free products. These incentive costs are recognized on the later of the date that the Company recognizes the related revenue or the date on which the Company offers the incentive.

Selling, general and administrative expenses (‘‘SG&A expenses&A’’) include expenses to advertise the Company's products, such as television advertising production costs and air-time costs, print advertising costs, promotional displays and consumer promotions. SG&A also includes the amortization of permanent wall displays and intangible assets, distribution costs (such as freight and handling), non-manufacturing overhead, principally personnel and related expenses, insurance and professional fees.

Income Taxes:

Income taxes are calculated using the asset and liability method in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 109, "Accounting‘‘Accounting for Income Taxes."’’

Revlon, Inc. and its U.S. subsidiaries, including Products Corporation, for federal income tax purposes, were included through the period ended March 25, 2004 in the affiliated group of which MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings was the common parent (the ‘‘MacAndrews & Forbes Group’’), and Revlon, Inc.'s and its U.S. subsidiaries'subsidiaries’, including Products Corporation's,Corporation’s, federal taxable income and loss was through the period ended March 25, 2004 included in such group's consolidated tax return filed by MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings. As a result of the Revlon Exchange Transactions (as hereinafter defined) (See(see Note 9, to the Consolidated Financial Statements)‘‘Long-Term Debt’’), as of the end of the day on March 25, 2004, Revlon, Inc. and its U.S. subsidiaries, including Products Corporation, arewere no longer included in the MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings consolidated groupGroup for federal income tax purposes.

Pension and Other Post-retirement and Post-employment Benefits:

The Company sponsors pension and other retirement plans in various forms covering substantially all employees who meet the respective plan's eligibility requirements. For plans in the U.S., the minimum amount required pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, as amended, is contributed annually. Various subsidiaries outside the U.S. have retirement plans under which funds are deposited with trustees or reserves are provided.

The Company accounts for benefits such as severance, disability and health insurance provided to former employees prior to their retirement when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of such liability can be reasonably estimated.

Research and Development:

Research and development expenditures are expensed as incurred. The amounts charged against earnings in 2005, 2004 and 2003 for research and 2002development expenditures were $26.1 million, $24.0 million and $25.4 and $23.3,million, respectively.

Foreign Currency Translation:

Assets and liabilities of foreign operations are generally translated into U.S. dollars at the rates of exchange in effect at the balance sheet date. Income and expense items are generally translated at the weighted average exchange rates prevailing during each period presented. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in the results of operations. Gains and losses resulting from translation of financial statements of foreign subsidiaries and branches operating in non-hyperinflationary economies are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss until either sale or upon complete or substantially complete liquidation by the Company of its investment in a foreign entity. Foreign subsidiaries and branches operating in hyperinflationary economies translate non-monetary assets and liabilities at historical rates and include translation adjustments in the results of operations.

Sale of Subsidiary Stock:

The Company recognizes gains and losses on sales of subsidiary stock in its Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Classes of Stock:

Products Corporation designated 1,000 shares of preferred stock as the "Series A Preferred Stock" (the "Products Corporation ‘‘Series A Preferred Stock")Stock’’, of which 546 shares are outstanding and held by Revlon, Inc. The holder of the Products Corporation Series A Preferred Stock is not entitled to receive any dividends. The Products Corporation Series A Preferred Stock is entitled to a liquidation preference of $100,000 per share before any distribution is made to the holder of Products Corporation's common stock. The holder of the Products Corporation Series A Preferred Stock does not have any voting rights, except as required by law. The Products Corporation Series A Preferred Stock may be redeemed at any time by Products Corporation, at its option, for $100,000 per share. However, the terms of Products Corporation's various debt agreements currently restrict Products Corporation's ability to effect such redemption.

Stock-Based Compensation:

SFAS No. 123, "Accounting‘‘Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," ("SFAS No. 123")’’ encourages, but does not require, companies to record compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation plans at fair value. Thevalue for fiscal periods ended on or before December 31, 2005. For such periods, the Company has chosen to account for stock-based compensation plans using the intrinsic value method as prescribed in APBAccounting Principles Board (‘‘APB’’) Opinion No. 25, "Accounting‘‘Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,"’’ and related interpretations. Accordingly, compensation cost for stock options issuedgranted to employees is measured as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of Revlon, Inc.'s’s Class A common stock, with a par value of $0.01 per share (the "Revlon ‘‘Class A Common Stock"Stock’’), at the date of the grant over the amount an employee must pay to acquire such common stock.

The following table illustrates the effect on net loss as if the Company had applied the fair value method to its stock-based compensation under the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123 and amended

disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148, "Accounting‘‘Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 123"123’’, which is more fully described in Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements:14, ‘‘Stock Compensation Plan’’:

				Year Ended December 31,
				2004				2003				2002
Net loss as reported				$	(142.8	)		$	(154.0	)		$	(281.8	)
Add: Stock-based employee compensation included in reported net loss					5.2				2.2				1.7
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards					(30.3	)			(7.7	)			(6.9	)
Pro forma net loss				$	(167.9	)		$	(159.5	)		$	(287.0	)

				Year Ended December 31,
				2005				2004				2003
Net loss as reported				$	(77.8	)		$	(142.8	)		$	(154.0	)
Add-back: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net loss					5.8				5.2				2.2
Deduct: Stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards					(22.1	)			(30.3	)			(7.7	)
Pro forma net loss				$	(94.1	)		$	(167.9	)		$	(159.5	)

The effectsCompany uses the Black-Scholes option valuation model (‘‘Black-Scholes’’), which is the measure of applyingfair value most often utilized under SFAS No. 123 in this pro forma disclosure are not necessarily indicative123. The Company estimated the fair value of future amounts.stock-based compensation issued to employees during each respective period using Black-Scholes with the following weighted average assumptions:

				Year Ended December 31,
				2005				2004				2003
Expected life of option				4.75 years				7.00 years				7.00 years
Risk-free interest rate				3.95%				3.95%				3.72%
Expected volatility				61%				69%				70%
Expected dividend yield				N/A				N/A				N/A

Derivative Financial Instruments:

The Company accounts for derivative financial instruments in accordance with SFAS No. 133, as amended by SFAS No. 149. The standard requires the recognition of all derivative instruments on the balance sheet as either assets or liabilities measured at fair value. Changes in fair value are recognized immediately in earnings unless the derivatives qualify as hedges of future cash flows. For derivatives qualifying as hedges of future cash flows, the effective portion of changes in fair value is recorded as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) and recognized in earnings when the hedged transaction is recognized in earnings. Any ineffective portion (representing the extent that the change in fair value of the hedges does not completely offset the change in the anticipated net payments being hedged) is recognized in earnings as it occurs. If a derivative instrument designated as a hedge is terminated, the unrecognized fair value of the hedge previously recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is recognized in earnings when the hedged transaction is recognized in earnings. If the transaction being hedged is terminated, the unrecognized fair value of the Company's related hedge instrument is recognized in earnings at that time.

The Company formally designates and documents each financial instrument as a hedge of a specific underlying exposure, as well as the risk management objectives and strategies for entering into the hedge transaction upon inception. The Company also formally assesses upon inception and quarterly thereafter whether the financial instruments used in hedging transactions are effective in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged items.

The Company uses derivative financial instruments, primarily foreign currency forward exchange contracts, to reduce the effects of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. These contracts, which have been designated as cash flow hedges, were entered into primarily to hedge anticipated inventory purchases and certain intercompany payments denominated in foreign currencies, which have maturities

of less than one year. Any unrecognized income (loss) related to these contracts are recorded in the Statement of Operations primarily in cost of goods sold when the underlying transactions hedged are realized (e.g., when inventory is sold or intercompany transactions are settled). The CompanyProducts Corporation enters into these contracts with counterparties that are major financial institutions, and accordingly the

Company believes that the risk of counterparty nonperformance is remote. During 2005, 2004 2003 and 2002,2003, net derivative losses of $2.2 million, $1.5 million and $1.5 and $0.6,million, respectively, were reclassified to the Statement of Operations. The notional amount of the foreign currency forward exchange contracts outstanding at December 31, 2005 and 2004 was $31.9 million and 2003 was $31.5 and $8.3,million, respectively. The fair value of the foreign currency forward exchange contracts outstanding at December 31, 2005 and 2004 was $(0.2) million and 2003 was $(2.3) and $(0.8),million, respectively, and is recorded in ‘‘Accrued expenses and otherother’’ in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company had accumulated net derivative losses of $2.7$(0.3) million in other comprehensive loss as of December 31, 2004,2005 related to cash flow hedges, all of which will be reclassified into earnings within 12 months. The amount of the hedges' ineffectiveness for the years ended December 31, 20042005 and 20032004 recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations was not significant.

Advertising and Promotion:

Costs associated with advertising and promotion are expensed when incurred. The costs of promotional displays are expensed in the period in which they are shipped to customers. Television advertising production costs are expensed the first time the advertising takes place. Advertising and promotion expenses were $230.5 million, $225.2 million and $251.4 million for 2005, 2004 and $210.2 for 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively, and were included in SG&A expenses in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company also has various arrangements with customers pursuant to its trade terms to reimburse them for a portion of their advertising or promotional costs, which provide advertising and promotional benefits to the Company. Additionally, from time to time the Company may pay fees to customers in order to expand or maintain shelf space for its products. The costs that the Company incurs for "cooperative"‘‘cooperative’’ advertising programs, end cap placement, shelf placement costs and slotting fees are expensed as incurred and are netted against revenues on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Distribution Costs:

Costs, such as freight and handling costs, associated with distribution are expensed within SG&A when incurred. Distribution costs were $68.3 million, $62.0 million and $60.4 million for 2005, 2004 and $56.5 for 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements:

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, ‘‘Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.’’ SFAS No. 154 requires retroactive application of a voluntary change in accounting principle to prior period financial statements unless it is impracticable. SFAS No. 154 also requires that a change in method of depreciation, amortization or depletion for long-lived, non-financial assets be accounted for as a change in accounting estimate that is affected by a change in accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 replaces APB Opinion No. 20, ‘‘Accounting Changes’’ and SFAS No. 3, ‘‘Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements’’. SFAS No. 154 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company will adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 154 as of January 1, 2006 and does not expect that its adoption will have a material impact on its results of operations or financial condition.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), "Share-Based Payment,"‘‘Share-Based Payment’’, an amendment to FASB Statements Nos. 123 and 95 ("(‘‘SFAS No. 123(R)"’’), which replaces SFAS No. 123, and supercedes APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting‘‘Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees."Employees’’. SFAS No. 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair valuesvalues. In April 2005, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘SEC’’ or the ‘‘Commission’’) adopted a rule allowing companies to implement SFAS No. 123(R) at the beginning with the first interim or annual periodof their next fiscal year that begins after June 15, 2005, which for the Company will be effective beginning January 1, 2006. The Company will use the modified prospective transition method, utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model for the calculation of the fair value of its employee stock options. Under the modified prospective method, stock option awards that are granted, modified or settled after January 1, 2006 will be measured and accounted for in accordance with early adoption encouraged. TheSFAS No. 123(R). Compensation cost for awards granted prior to, but not vested, as of

January 1, 2006 would be based on the grant date attributes originally used to value those awards for pro forma disclosures previously permittedpurposes under SFAS No. 123 no longer will be an alternative to financial statement recognition.123. The Company is required to adopt SFAS No. 123(R) in the third quarter of fiscal 2005, beginning July 1, 2005. Under SFAS No. 123(R), the Company must determine the appropriate fair value model to be used for valuing share-based payments, the amortization method for compensation cost and the transition method to be used at the date of adoption. The transition methods are either a prospective method or a retroactive method. Under the retroactive method, prior periods may be restated either as of the beginning of the year of adoption or for all periods presented. The prospective method requires that compensation expense be recorded for all unvested stock options and restricted stock at the beginning of the first quarter of adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), while the retroactive methods would record compensation expense for all unvested stock options and restricted stock beginning with the first period restated. The Company is evaluating the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R) and expects that the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) will have a material impact on the Company's consolidated results of operations and earnings per share. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 123(R) and has not yet determined the method of adoption or the effect of adopting SFAS 123(R), and it has not determined whether its adoption will result in amounts in future periods that are similar to the Company's current pro forma disclosures under SFAS No. 123.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, "Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets — An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions" ("SFAS No. 153"). SFAS No. 153 eliminates the exception from fair value measurement for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets in paragraph 21(b) of APB Opinion No. 29, "Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions," and replaces it with an exception for exchanges that do not have commercial substance. SFAS No. 153 specifies that a nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. SFAS No. 153 is effective for the fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005 and is required to be adopted by the Company beginning on January 1, 2006. The provisions of this statement will be applied prospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 153 and does not expect that the adoption of SFAS No. 153 will have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, "Inventory‘‘Inventory Costs — An Amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4" ("SFAS No. 151")4’’. SFAS No. 151 amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, "Inventory Pricing,"‘‘Inventory Pricing’’, to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted materialmaterials (spoilage). Among other provisions, the new rule requires that the aforementioned items such as idle facility expense, excessive spoilage, double freight, and handling cost be recognized as current-period charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of "so abnormal" as stated in ARB No. 43.charges. Additionally, SFAS No. 151 requires that the allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005 and is required to be adopted by the Company beginning on January 1, 2006. The Company is currently evaluatinghad early adopted the impactprovisions of SFAS No. 151 but does not expect that it will have a material impact on its consolidated resultsduring the third quarter of operations and financial condition.

In May 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 106-2 ("FSP 106-2"), "Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003"2005, which provides guidance on the accounting for the effects of the Medicare Act. FSP No. 106-2, which requires measurement of the Accumulated Postretirement Benefit Obligation ("APBO") and net periodic postretirement benefit cost to reflect the effects of the Medicare Act, supercedes FSP 106-1. FSP 106-2 is effective for interim or annual periods beginning after June 15, 2004. Adoption of FSP 106-2adoption did not have a material impact on the Company'sCompany’s consolidated results of operations and financial condition.position.

2.	RESTRUCTURING COSTS AND OTHER, NET

2.    Restructuring CostsDuring 2005, the Company recorded net charges of $1.5 million for employee severance and Other, Net

other related personnel benefits. During 2004, the Company recorded net charges of $5.8 million primarily for employee severance and other related personnel benefits for 42 employees in connection with realignments within several departmental functions and international operations, as to which 3240 employees had been terminated as of December 31, 2004.2005. In 2003, the Company recorded separate charges of $5.9 million for employee severance and other personnel benefits for 421 employees in certain International operations, as to which 366397 employees had been terminated as of December 31, 2004.2005.

During 2003 and 2002, the Company recorded a charge of $0.1 and $13.6 related to the 2000 restructuring program, principally for additional employee severance and other personnel benefits and relocation and other costs related to the consolidation of the Company's worldwide operations.

During the third quarter of 2000, the Company initiated a new restructuring program in line with the original restructuring plan developed in late 1998, designedDesigned to improve profitability by reducing personnel and consolidating manufacturing facilities. Thecertain facilities, the 2000 restructuring program focused onaccounted for the Company's plans to close its manufacturing operations in Phoenix, Arizona and Mississauga, Canada and to consolidate its cosmetics production into its plant in Oxford, North Carolina. The 2000 restructuring program also includes the remaining obligation forof excess leased real estate in the Company's old New York City headquarters, consolidation costs associated with the Company closing its facility in New Zealand,certain facilities and the elimination of several domestic and international executive and operational positions, each of which were effected to reduce and streamline corporate overhead costs.positions. The 2000 restructuring program was fully paid-out in 2004.

Details of the activity described above during 2005, 2004 2003 and 20022003 are as follows:

				Balance Beginning of Year				Expenses, Net				Utilized, Net								Balance End of Year
												Cash				Noncash
2004
Employee severance and other personnel benefits:
2000 program				$	1.8			$	—			$	(1.8	)		$	—			$	—
2003 program					5.0				0.1				(2.4	)			0.4				3.1
2004 program					—				5.9				(0.8	)			—				5.1
					6.8				6.0				(5.0	)			0.4				8.2
Leases and equipment write-offs					2.2				(0.2	)			0.6				0.3				2.9
				$	9.0			$	5.8			$	(4.4	)		$	0.7			$	11.1
2003
Employee severance and other personnel benefits:
2000 program				$	7.0			$	—			$	(5.2	)		$	—			$	1.8
2003 program					—				5.9				(0.9	)			—				5.0
					7.0				5.9				(6.1	)			—				6.8
Relocation					—				0.1				(0.1	)			—				—
Leases and equipment write-offs					3.9				—				(1.7	)			—				2.2
Other obligations					0.9				—				—				(0.9	)			—
				$	11.8			$	6.0			$	(7.9	)		$	(0.9	)		$	9.0
2002
Employee severance and other personnel benefits				$	15.1			$	10.1			$	(18.2	)		$	—			$	7.0
Relocation					—				0.6				(0.6	)			—				—
Leases and equipment write-offs					7.4				1.7				(4.9	)			(0.3	)			3.9
Other obligations					0.3				1.2				(0.6	)			—				0.9
				$	22.8			$	13.6			$	(24.3	)		$	(0.3	)		$	11.8

				Balance Beginning of Year				Expenses, Net				Utilized, Net
												Cash				Noncash				Balance End of Year
2005
Employee severance and other personnel benefits:
2003 programs				$	3.1			$	—			$	(1.7	)		$	(0.2	)		$	1.2
2004 programs					5.1				1.5				(3.9	)			(0.3	)			2.4
					8.2				1.5				(5.6	)			(0.5	)			3.6
Leases and equipment write-offs					2.9				—				(2.0	)			(0.3	)			0.6
				$	11.1			$	1.5			$	(7.6	)		$	(0.8	)		$	4.2
2004
Employee severance and other personnel benefits:
2000 program				$	1.8			$	—			$	(1.8	)		$	—			$	—
2003 program					5.0				0.1				(2.4	)			0.4				3.1
2004 program					—				5.9				(0.8	)			—				5.1
					6.8				6.0				(5.0	)			0.4				8.2
Leases and equipment write-offs					2.2				(0.2	)			0.6				0.3				2.9
				$	9.0			$	5.8			$	(4.4	)		$	0.7			$	11.1
2003
Employee severance and other personnel benefits:
2000 program				$	7.0			$	—			$	(5.2	)		$	—			$	1.8
2003 program					—				5.9				(0.9	)			—				5.0
					7.0				5.9				(6.1	)			—				6.8
Relocation					—				0.1				(0.1	)			—				—
Leases and equipment write-offs					3.9				—				(1.7	)			—				2.2
Other obligations					0.9				—				—				(0.9	)			—
				$	11.8			$	6.0			$	(7.9	)		$	(0.9	)		$	9.0

As of December 31, 2005, 2004 2003 and 2002,2003, the unpaid balance of the restructuring costs and other, net for reserves are included in accrued‘‘Accrued expenses and otherother’’ and other‘‘Other long-term liabilitiesliabilities’’ in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. The remaining balance at December 31, 20042005 for employee severance and other personnel benefits is $8.2,$4.2 million, of which $6.7$3.8 million is expected to be paid by the end of 20052006 and the remaining lease and equipment obligations of $2.9$0.4 million are expected to be paid by the end of 2008.

3.    Dispositions

Described below are the principal sales of certain brands and facilities entered into by Products Corporations during 2004, 2003 and 2002:

3.	DISPOSITIONS

In December 2003, the Company sold a facility located in Canada for approximately $5.2 million and leased it back through the end of 2006. In connection with such disposition, the Company willwould recognize a pre-tax and after-tax net gain of approximately $1.7 million ratably over the remaining 3-year lease term.

In February 2002, Products Corporation completed the dispositionterm, of its Benelux business. As partwhich approximately $0.6 million was recognized in each of this sale, Products Corporation entered into a long-term distribution agreement2005 and 2004, with the purchaser pursuantremaining amount to whichbe recognized in 2006. For 2005 and 2004, the purchaser distributes the Company's products in Benelux. The purchase price consisted principally of the assumption of certain liabilities and a deferred purchase price contingent uponCompany had no additional dispositions.

future results of up to approximately $4.7, which could be received over approximately a seven-year period. In connection with the disposition, the Company recognized a pre-tax and after-tax net loss of $1.0 in the first quarter of 2002.

4.    Inventories

4.	INVENTORIES

				December 31,
				2004				2003
Raw materials and supplies				$	48.1			$	48.3
Work-in-process					12.2				11.6
Finished goods					94.4				82.8
				$	154.7			$	142.7

5.    Prepaid Expenses and Other

				December 31,
				2005				2004
Raw materials and supplies				$	60.7			$	48.1
Work-in-process					17.6				12.2
Finished goods					142.3				94.4
				$	220.6			$	154.7

5.	PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER

				December 31,
				2004				2003
Prepaid expenses				$	35.4			$	22.9
Other					32.4				23.7
				$	67.8			$	46.6

6.    Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

				December 31,
				2005				2004
Prepaid expenses				$	37.8			$	35.4
Other					23.7				32.4
				$	61.5			$	67.8

6.	PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET

				December 31,
				2004				2003
Land and improvements				$	2.3			$	2.2
Buildings and improvements					84.1				82.8
Machinery and equipment and capitalized leases					144.3				135.1
Office furniture and fixtures and capitalized software					113.6				109.5
Leasehold improvements					17.4				12.5
Construction-in-progress					7.8				10.5
					369.5				352.6
Accumulated depreciation					(250.8	)			(220.5	)
				$	118.7			$	132.1

				December 31,
				2005				2004
Land and improvements				$	2.2			$	2.3
Building and improvements					57.6				57.3
Machinery, equipment and capital leases					125.7				125.1
Office furniture, fixtures and capitalized software					110.3				110.6
Leasehold improvements					18.9				17.4
Construction-in-progress					14.9				7.8
					329.6				320.5
Accumulated depreciation					(209.9	)			(201.8	)
				$	119.7			$	118.7

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 was $22.7 million, $34.0 million and $33.7 million, respectively. In 2002, was $34.0, $33.7 and $34.5, respectively. Thethe Company has evaluated its management information systems and determined, among other things, to upgrade its systems. As a result of this decision, certain existing information systems are beingwere amortized on an accelerated basis. The additional amortization recorded in 2004 and 2003 was $4.3 million and $4.6 respectively.

7.    Accrued Expensesmillion, respectively, and Otherthese information systems were then fully amortized in 2004.

7.	ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER

				December 31,
				2004				2003
Sales returns and allowances				$	103.3			$	103.4
Advertising and promotional costs					45.5				52.3
Compensation and related benefits					56.9				65.7
Interest					20.9				40.7
Taxes, other than federal income taxes					13.0				9.3
Restructuring costs					7.6				6.4
Other					36.0				44.2
				$	283.2			$	322.0

8.    Short-term Borrowings

				December 31,
				2005				2004
Sales returns and allowances				$	141.2			$	103.3
Advertising and promotional costs					48.0				45.5
Compensation and related benefits					61.5				56.9
Interest					28.5				20.9
Taxes, other than federal income taxes					13.8				13.0
Restructuring costs					3.8				7.6
Other					31.6				36.0
				$	328.4			$	283.2

8.	SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS

Products Corporation had outstanding short-term bank borrowings (excluding borrowings under the 2004 Credit Agreement (as hereinafter defined)defined in Note 9)) aggregating $9.0 million and $36.6 and $28.0million at

December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively. The weighted average interest rate on short-term borrowings outstanding at December 31, 2005 and 2004 was 13.7% and 2003 was 4.2% and 4.0%, respectively. The higher weighted average interest rate for short-term borrowings in 2005 reflects higher-rate borrowings in certain Latin American countries and the cessation of one of the Company’s cash-collateralized borrowing arrangements with a financial institution. Under these short termcash-collateralized borrowing arrangements, the Company iswas permitted to borrow against its cash balances. The cash balances and related borrowings are shown gross in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, the Company had $3.2 million and $36.2 and $27.9,million, respectively, of cash supporting such short-term borrowings. Interest rates on these cash balances at December 31, 20042005 and 20032004 ranged from 0.3% to 0.5% and 0.5% to 4.5% and 0.6% to 4.7%, respectively.

9.    Long-term Debt

9.	LONG-TERM DEBT

				December 31,
				2004				2003
2001 Credit Agreement due 2005 (a)				$	—			$	217.3
2004 Credit Agreement (a):
Term Loan Facility due 2010					800.0				—
Multi-Currency Facility due 2009					—				—
8 1/8% Senior Notes due 2006 (b)					116.2				249.8
9% Senior Notes due 2006 (c)					75.5				250.0
8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008 (d)					327.0				649.9
12% Senior Secured Notes due 2005 (e)					—				356.3
2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit (f)					—				—
12% Senior Unsecured Multiple-Draw Term Loan due 2005 (f)					—				106.6
8% MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit due 2005 (f)					—				15.5
Advances from affiliates					—				24.1
					1,318.7				1,869.5
Less current portion					(10.5	)			—
				$	1,308.2			$	1,869.5

				December 31,
				2005				2004
2004 Credit Agreement (a):
Term Loan Facility due 2010				$	700.0			$	800.0
Multi-Currency Facility due 2009					—				—
8 1/8% Senior Notes due 2006 (b)					—				116.2
9% Senior Notes due 2006 (c)					—				75.5
9½% Senior Notes due 2011, net of discounts (d)					386.4				—
8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008 (e)					327.0				327.0
2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit					—				—
					1,413.4				1,318.7
Less current portion					—				(10.5	)
				$	1,413.4			$	1,308.2

The Company completed two significant financing transactions during 2005: (i) Products Corporation issued $310.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 9½% Senior Notes (as hereinafter defined), and using the proceeds of such notes, Products Corporation completed the redemption of all $116.2 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its 8 1/8% Senior Notes (as hereinafter defined) and all $75.5 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its 9% Senior Notes (as hereinafter defined) and prepaid $100.0 million of the Term Loan Facility (as hereinafter defined) and paid related fees and expenses incurred in connection with such transactions and (ii) Products Corporation issued $80.0 million aggregate principal amount of additional 9½% Senior Notes, which priced at 95¼% of par, and used the proceeds to fund general corporate purposes, principally to fund its brand initiatives, namely the relaunch of the Almay brand and the launch of its new Vital Radiance brand.

The Company completed two significant financing transactions during 2004: (i) Revlon, Inc. exchanged approximately $804 million of ProductProducts Corporation's debt, $54.6 million of Revlon, Inc. preferred stock and $9.9 million of accrued interest for 299,969,493 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock (the "Revlon‘‘Revlon Exchange Transactions"Transactions’’) and (ii) Products Corporation entered into the 2004 Credit Agreement, consisting of an $800$800.0 million term loan facility (before giving effect to the $100.0 million prepayment discussed above) and a $160$160.0 million asset-based multi-currency revolving credit facility, and used the proceeds to refinance its 2001 Credit Agreement (as hereinafter defined) and to complete a tender offer and subsequent redemption of all of its 12% Senior Secured Notes due 2005. See discussion below.

	(a)	2004 Credit Agreement:

(a) OnIn July 9, 2004, Products Corporation entered into a new credit agreement (the "2004 Credit Agreement") to refinance the credit agreement that it had entered into in 2001 and which was to mature in May 2005 (the "2001 Credit Agreement"). Products Corporation entered into the ‘‘2004 Credit AgreementAgreement’’) with certain of its subsidiaries as local borrowing subsidiaries, a syndicate of lenders, whose individual members change from time to time, and Citicorp USA, Inc., as multi-currency administrative agent, term loan administrative agent and collateral agent.

The 2004 Credit Agreement providesoriginally provided up to $960.0 million and, consistsbefore giving effect to the $100.0 million prepayment in March 2005, consisted of an $800.0 million term loan facility (the "Term ‘‘Term

Loan Facility"Facility’’) and a $160.0 million asset-based multi-currency revolving credit facility (the "Multi-Currency Facility"‘‘Multi-Currency Facility’’), collectively referredthe availability under which varies based upon the borrowing base that is based upon the value of eligible accounts receivable, eligible inventory and eligible real property and equipment in the U.S. and the U.K. from time to as the 2004 Credit Facilities".time. Products Corporation may request the Multi-Currency Facility to be increased from time to time in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $50.0 million subject to certain exceptions and subject to the lenders'lenders’ agreement. The Multi-Currency Facility is available to: (i) Products Corporation in revolving credit loans denominated in U.S. dollars, (ii) Products Corporation in swing line loans denominated in U.S. dollars up to $25.0 million, (iii) Products Corporation in standby and commercial letters of credit denominated in U.S. dollars and other currencies up to $50.0 million and (iv) Products Corporation and certain of its international subsidiaries designated from time to time in revolving credit loans and bankers'bankers’ acceptances denominated in U.S. dollars and other currencies, (the "Local Loans"), in each case subject to borrowing base availability that is determined based on the value of eligible accounts receivable, eligible inventory and eligible real property and equipment from time to time.availability. If the value of the eligible assets is not sufficient to support the $160.0 million borrowing base, Products Corporation will not have full access to the Multi-Currency Facility. Products Corporation'sCorporation’s ability to make borrowings under the Multi-Currency Facility is also conditioned upon the satisfaction of certain conditions precedent and Products Corporation'sCorporation’s compliance with other covenants in the 2004 Credit Agreement, including a fixed charge coverage ratio that applies if and when the excess borrowing base is less than $30.0.

The Multi-Currency Facility will terminate on July 9, 2009 and the loans$30.0 million. In March 2005, Products Corporation prepaid $100.0 million of indebtedness outstanding under the Term Loan Facility, will mature on July 9, 2010; provided thattogether with accrued interest and the 2004 Credit Facilities will terminate on October 31, 2005 if Products Corporation's 8 1/8%$5.0 million prepayment fee associated with such prepayment, using proceeds from the issuance of the Original 9½% Senior Notes are not repaid, redeemed, repurchased or defeased in full as provided in the 2004 Credit Agreement on or before such date, on July 31, 2006 if Products Corporation's 9% Senior Notes are not repaid redeemed, repurchased or defeased in full on or before such date, and on October 30, 2007 if Products Corporation's 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes are not repaid redeemed, repurchased or defeased on or before such date such that not more than $25.0 in aggregate principal amount of the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes remains outstanding (as each such series of notes is hereinafter defined). In addition, it would be an event of default under the

During July and August 2004, Credit Agreement if Revlon, Inc. failed to undertake an approximately $110.0 equity offering and transfer the net proceeds of such offering to Products Corporation to reduce Products Corporation's outstanding indebtedness by March 31, 2006.

In March 2005, Revlon, Inc. and MacAndrews & Forbes amended MacAndrews & Forbes' obligation under the 2004 Investment Agreement (as hereinafter defined) to backstop a $109.7 equity offering to be conducted by Revlon, Inc. by accelerating such obligation to October 31, 2005 from March 31, 2006 in the event that Products Corporation has not as of such date refinanced the 8 1/8% Senior Notes and, therefore, Revlon, Inc. uses an equity offering to effect such refinancing. In accordance with SFAS No. 6, "Classification of Short-Term Obligations Expected to be Refinanced," $107.7 (being $109.7, less estimated future transaction costs) of the 8 1/8% Senior Notes have been classified as long-term due to such amendment to the 2004 Investment Agreement.

The 2004 Credit Agreement replaced Products Corporation's 2001 Credit Agreement, which was due to expire on May 30, 2005. Products Corporation's EBITDA (as defined in the 2001 Credit Agreement) for the four consecutive fiscal quarters ended December 31, 2003 was less than the minimum of $230 required under the 2001 Credit Agreement for that period and the Company's leverage ratio was 1.66:1.00, which was in excess of the maximum ratio of 1.10:1.00 permitted under the 2001 Credit Agreement for that period. Accordingly, Products Corporation sought and on January 28, 2004 secured waivers of compliance with these covenants for the four quarters ended December 31, 2003. In light of the Company's expectation that its plan would affect Products Corporation's ability to comply with these covenants during 2004, Products Corporation also secured an amendment to eliminate the EBITDA and leverage ratio covenants under the 2001 Credit Agreement for the first three quarters of 2004 and a waiver

of compliance with such covenants for the four quarters ending December 31, 2004, expiring on January 31, 2005 (the "January 2004 Bank Amendment"). In July 2004, the 2001 Credit Agreement was repaid and refinanced with the 2004 Credit Agreement. In connection with the replacement and repayment of the 2001 Credit Agreement, the Company recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $4.3, which represents the write-off of deferred financing costs.

Products Corporation used the proceeds offrom borrowings under the 2004 Credit AgreementTerm Loan Facility to repay in full the $290.5 million of outstanding indebtedness (including accrued interest) under Products Corporation's credit agreement dated November 30, 2001 and which was scheduled to mature on May 30, 2005 (as amended, the ‘‘2001 Credit Agreement,Agreement’’), to purchase and redeem a totalin July and August 2004 (the ‘‘Tender Offer’’) all of $363the $363.0 million aggregate principal amount of theProducts Corporation’s 12% Senior Secured Notes (as hereinafter defined) for a purchase price of approximately $412.3 million (including the applicable premium and accrued interest), and to pay fees and expenses incurred in connection with the 2004 Credit Agreement, the purchase and redemption ofTender Offer for the 12% Senior Secured Notes and the Revlon Exchange Transactions, including the payment of expenses related to a refinancing that Products Corporation launched in May 2004 but did not consummate. The balance of such proceeds iswas available to Products Corporation for general corporate purposes.

The Multi-Currency Facility will terminate on July 9, 2009 and the loans under the Term Loan Facility will mature on July 9, 2010; provided that the 2004 Credit Agreement will terminate on October 30, 2007 if the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes (as hereinafter defined) are not redeemed, repurchased, defeased or repaid on or before such date such that not more than $25.0 million in aggregate principal amount of such notes remain outstanding. In addition to customary events of default, it would be an event of default under the 2004 Credit Agreement if Revlon, Inc. fails to undertake an approximately $110.0 million equity issuance and transfer the proceeds of such equity issuance to Products Corporation by March 31, 2006 to promptly reduce its outstanding indebtedness. See Note 19, ‘‘Subsequent Events’’.

Borrowings under the Multi-Currency Facility (other than loans in foreign currencies) bear interest at a rate equal to, at Products Corporation's option, either (A) the Alternate Base Rate plus 1.50%; or (B) the Eurodollar Rate plus 2.50%. Loans in foreign currencies bear interest in certain limited circumstances or if mutually acceptable to Products Corporation and the relevant foreign lenders at the Local Rate, and otherwise at the Eurocurrency Rate, in each case plus 2.50%. The loans under the Term Loan Facility bear interest at a rate equal to, at Products Corporation's option, either (A) the Alternate Base Rate plus 5.00%; or (B) the Eurodollar Rate plus 6.00%. At December 31, 2004,2005, the weighted average rate for borrowings under the Term Loan Facility was 8.0%10.1%. Products Corporation pays to those lenders under the Multi-Currency Facility a commitment fee of 0.50% of the average daily unused portion of the Multi-Currency Facility, which fee is payable quarterly in arrears. Under the Multi-Currency Facility, Products Corporation pays (i) to foreign lenders a fronting fee of 0.25% per annum on the aggregate principal amount of specified Local Loans (which fee is retained by the foreign lenders out of the portion of the Applicable Margin payable to such foreign lender), (ii) to foreign lenders an administrative fee of 0.25% per annum on the aggregate principal amount of specified Local Loans, (iii) to the multi-currency lenders a letter of credit commission equal to (a) the Applicable Margin for revolving credit loans that are Eurodollar Rate loans (adjusted for the term that the letter of credit is outstanding) times (b) the aggregate undrawn face amount of letters of credit and (iv) to the issuing lender a letter of credit fronting fee of 0.25% per annum of the aggregate undrawn face amount of letters of credit (which fee is a portion of the Applicable Margin).

Prior to the termination date of the Term Loan Facility, on October 15, January 15, April 15 and July 15 of each year (commencing October 15, 2005) Products Corporation shall repay $2.0 in aggregate principal amount of the term loans outstanding under the Term Loan Facility on each respective date. In addition, the loans under the Term Loan Facility are required to be prepaid with: (i) the net proceeds in excess of $10.0 each year (subject to limited carryover to subsequent years) received during such year from sales of Term Loan First Lien Collateral (as defined below) by Products Corporation or any of its subsidiary guarantors (and in excess of an additional $25.0 in the aggregate during the term of the 2004 Credit Facilities with respect to certain specified dispositions), subject to certain limited exceptions, (ii) certain net proceeds from equity offerings by Revlon, Inc. that are not used to redeem, repurchase or defease the 8 1/8% Senior Notes, the 9% Senior Notes, the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes or certain other indebtedness, (iii) the net proceeds from the issuance by Products Corporation or any of its subsidiaries of certain additional debt and (iv) 50% of Products Corporation's Excess Cash Flow (as defined in the 2004 Credit Agreement) for any fiscal year.

The 2004 Credit Facilities are supported by, among other things, guarantees from Revlon, Inc. and, subject to certain limited exceptions, the domestic subsidiaries of Products Corporation. The obligations of Products Corporation under the 2004 Credit Facilities and the obligations under the guarantees are secured by, subject to certain limited exceptions, substantially all of the assets of Products Corporation and the subsidiary guarantors, including (i) mortgages on owned real property, including Products Corporation's facilities in Oxford, North Carolina and Irvington, New Jersey; (ii) the capital stock of

Products Corporation and the subsidiary guarantors and 66% of the capital stock of Products Corporation's and the subsidiary guarantors' first-tier foreign subsidiaries; (iii) intellectual property and other intangible property of Products Corporation and the subsidiary guarantors; and (iv) inventory, accounts receivable, equipment, investment property and deposit accounts of Products Corporation and the subsidiary guarantors. The liens on, among other things, inventory, accounts receivable, deposit accounts, investment property (other than the capital stock of Products Corporation and its subsidiaries), real property, equipment, fixtures and certain intangible property related thereto secure the Multi-Currency Facility on a first priority basis and the Term Loan Facility on a second priority basis, while the liens on the capital stock of Products Corporation and its subsidiaries and intellectual property and certain other intangible property (the "Term Loan First Lien Collateral") secure the Term Loan Facility on a first priority basis and the Multi-Currency Facility on a second priority basis, all as set forth in an Intercreditor and Collateral Agency Agreement by and among Products Corporation and the lenders, which also provides that the first priority liens referred to above may be shared from time to time, subject to certain limitations, with specified types of other obligations incurred or guaranteed by Products Corporation, such as foreign exchange and interest rate hedging obligations and foreign working capital lines, provided that to the extent such obligations and lines share in the collateral, the borrowing base is reduced by a reserve established from time to time by the bank agent in respect of such obligations and lines.

The 2004 Credit Agreement contains various restrictive covenants prohibiting Products Corporation and its subsidiaries from (i) incurring additional indebtedness or guarantees, with certain exceptions, (ii) making dividend and other payments or loans to Revlon, Inc. or other affiliates, with certain exceptions, including among others, exceptions permittingrequires Products Corporation to paycomply with various financial covenants and restrictions, including covenants and restrictions relating to indebtedness, liens, investments, sales of assets, mergers and acquisitions, dividends or make other payments to Revlon, Inc. to finance the actual payment by Revlon, Inc.and transactions with Products Corporation’s affiliates, each of expenses and obligations incurred by Revlon, Inc. to enable Revlon, Inc. to, among other things, pay expenses incidental to being a public holding company, including, among other things, professional fees such as legal and accounting fees, regulatory fees such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") filing fees and other miscellaneous expenses related to being a public holding company and,which is subject to certain circumstances, to finance the purchase by Revlon, Inc. of Revlon Class A Common Stock in connection with the delivery of such Revlon Class A Common Stock to grantees under the Amended and Restated Revlon, Inc. Stock Plan (the "Stock Plan"), and, subject to certain limitations, to pay dividends or make other payments to finance the purchase, redemption or other retirement for value by Revlon, Inc. of stock or other equity interests or equivalents in Revlon, Inc. held by any current or former director, employee or consultant in his or her capacity as such, (iii) creating liens or other encumbrances on Products Corporation's or its subsidiaries' assets or revenues, granting negative pledges or selling or transferring any of Products Corporation's or its subsidiaries' assets, all subject to certain limited exceptions, (iv) with certain exceptions, engaging in merger or acquisition transactions, (v) prepaying indebtedness and modifying the terms of certain indebtedness and specified material contractual obligations, subject to certain exceptions (including, without limitation, prepaying one or more of the 8 1/8% Notes, 9% Notes or 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes with the proceeds of certain equity offerings, including the approximate $110 equity offering to be conducted by Revlon, Inc. prior to March 31, 2006 and to be back-stopped by MacAndrews & Forbes up to such amount, or with certain permitted refinancing indebtedness), (vi) making investments, subject to certain exceptions, and (vii) entering into transactions with affiliates of Products Corporation other than upon terms no less favorable to Products Corporation or its subsidiaries than it would obtain in an arms' length transaction. In addition to the foregoing,exceptions. Additionally, the 2004 Credit Agreement contains financial covenants limiting theProducts Corporation’s senior secured leverage ratio of Products Corporation (the ratio of Products Corporation's Corporation’s

Senior Secured Debt to EBITDA, as each such term is defined in the 2004 Credit Agreement) to 5.50 to 1.00 for the four consecutive quarters ending during the period from December 31, 2004 to September 30, 2005; 5.00 to 1.00 for the four consecutive quarters ending during the period from December 31, 2005 to December 31, 2006; and 4.50 to 1.00 for the four consecutive quarters ending March 31, 2007 and each subsequent quarter until the maturity date of the 2004 Credit Agreement, and,Agreement. Additionally, under any circumstances when the excess borrowing base under the Multi-Currency Facility is less than $30.0 million for a period of 30 consecutive days or more, requiring Products Corporation would be required to maintain a consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio (the ratio of EBITDA minus Capital Expenditures to Cash Interest Expense for such period, as each such term is defined in the 2004 Credit Agreement) of 1.00 to

1.00. The CompanyProducts Corporation was in compliance with theseall applicable covenants at December 31, 2004. (See Subsequent Event in Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.)

The events of default under the 2004 Credit Agreement include customary eventsas of default for such types of agreements, including (i) nonpayment of any principal, interest or other fees when due, subject inDecember 31, 2005. (See Note 19, ‘‘Subsequent Events’’, regarding recent amendments to the case of interest and fees to a grace period; (ii) non-compliance with thefinancial covenants inunder the 2004 Credit Agreement orAgreement).

At December 31, 2005, the ancillary security documents, subject in certain instances to grace periods; (iii) the institution of any bankruptcy, insolvency or similar proceeding by or against Products Corporation, any of Products Corporation's subsidiaries or Revlon, Inc., subject in certain instances to grace periods; (iv) default by Revlon, Inc., or any of its subsidiaries (y) in the payment of certain indebtedness when due (whether at maturity or by acceleration) in excess of $5.0 in aggregate principal amount or (z) in the observance or performance of any other agreement or condition relating to such debt, provided that the amount of debt involved is in excess of $5.0 in aggregate principal amount, or the occurrence of any other event, the effect of which default or other event is to cause or permit the holders of such debt to cause the acceleration of payment of such debt; (v) the failure by Products Corporation, certain of Products Corporation's subsidiaries or Revlon, Inc., to pay certain material judgments; (vi) a change of control such that (w) Revlon, Inc. shall cease to be the beneficialTerm Loan Facility was fully drawn and record owner of 100% of Products Corporation's capital stock, (x) Ronald O. Perelman (or his estate, heirs, executors, administrator or other personal representative) and his or their controlled affiliates shall cease to "control" Products Corporation, and any other person or group of persons owns more than 25% of the total voting power of Revlon, Inc., (y) any person or group of persons other than Ronald O. Perelman (or his estate, heirs, executors, administrator or other personal representative) and his or their controlled affiliates shall "control" Products Corporation or (z) the current directors serving on Products Corporation's Board of Directors (or other directors nominated by at least 66 2/3% of such continuing directors) shall cease to be a majority of the directors; (vii) the failure by Revlon, Inc. (y) to conduct an approximately $110.0 equity offering and to transfer the net proceeds of such offering to Products Corporation to reduce its outstanding indebtedness by March 31, 2006 or (z) to contribute to Products Corporation all of the net proceeds it receives from any other sale of its equity securities or Products Corporation's capital stock, subject to certain limited exceptions; (viii) the failure of any of Products Corporation's, its subsidiaries' or Revlon, Inc.'s representations or warranties in any of the documents entered into in connection with the 2004 Credit Agreement to be correct, true and not misleading in all material respects when made or confirmed; (ix) the conduct by Revlon, Inc., of any meaningful business activities other than those that are customary for a publicly traded holding company which is not itself an operating company, including the ownership of meaningful assets (other than Products Corporation's capital stock) or the incurrence of debt, in each case subject to limited exceptions; (x) MacAndrews & Forbes' failure to fund any binding commitmentavailability under the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes LineMulti-Currency Facility, based upon the calculated borrowing base less approximately $16 million of Credit; and (xi)outstanding letters of credit, was approximately $144 million, as the failure of certain of Products Corporation's affiliates which hold Products Corporation's or its subsidiaries' indebtedness to be party to a valid and enforceable agreement prohibiting such affiliate from demanding or retaining payments in respect of such indebtedness.Multi-Currency Facility was undrawn.

	(b)	Redemption of the 8 1/8% Senior Notes due 2006 (the ‘‘8 1/8% Senior Notes’’):

The 8 1/8% Senior Notes, due 2006 (the "8 1/8% Senior Notes") areprior to their redemption in April 2005, were senior unsecured obligations of Products Corporation and rankranked equally in right of payment with all existing and future senior debt of Products Corporation, including the 9%9½% Senior Notes, the indebtedness under the 2004 Credit Agreement and the indebtedness under the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit (as hereinafter defined) and arewere senior to the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes and to all future subordinated indebtedness of Products Corporation. The 8 1/8% Senior Notes arewere effectively subordinated to the outstanding indebtedness and other liabilities of Products Corporation's subsidiaries. Interest iswas payable on February 1 and August 1.

The 8 1/8% Senior Notes are due February 2006 and may be redeemed at the optionprincipal amount of Products Corporation in whole or in part at any time on or after February 1, 2002 at the redemption prices set forth in the 8 1/8% Senior Notes indenture, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption. The 2004 Credit Agreement requires that Products Corporation redeem, repurchase or defease in full on or before October 31, 2005 the 8 1/8% Senior Notes. Otherwise, the 2004 Credit Facilities will terminate and all amounts$116.2 million outstanding under the 2004 Credit Facilities will become due on such date. In 2004, approximately $133.8 principal amount of the 8 1/8% Senior Notes were exchanged for Revlon Class A

Common Stockwas redeemed in the Revlon Exchange Transactions, as discussed below. (See "Subsequent Events" in Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.)

Upon a change of control, as defined in the 8 1/8% Senior Notes indenture, Products Corporation will have the option to redeem the 8 1/8% Senior Notes in whole at aApril 2005. The aggregate redemption price equal to the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon to the date of redemption, plus the applicable premium, as defined in the 8 1/8% Senior Notes indenture, and, subject to certain conditions, each holder of the 8 1/8% Senior Notes will havewas $118.1 million, which constituted the right to require Products Corporation to repurchase all or a portion of such holder'sprincipal amount and interest payable on the 8 1/8% Senior Notes atNotes. In connection with the redemption, the Company recognized a price equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon to the date of repurchase.

The 8 1/8% Senior Notes indenture contains covenants that, among other things, limit (i) the issuance of additional debt and redeemable stock by Products Corporation, (ii) the incurrence of liens, (iii) the issuanceloss on extinguishment of debt and preferred stock by Products Corporation's subsidiaries, (iv) the payment of dividends on capital stock of Products Corporation and its subsidiaries and the redemption of capital stock of Products Corporation and certain subordinated obligations, (v) the sale of assets and subsidiary stock, (vi) transactions with affiliates and (vii) consolidations, mergers and transfers of all or substantially all Products Corporation's assets. The 8 1/8% Senior Notes indenture also prohibits certain restrictions on distributions from subsidiaries. All of these limitations and prohibitions, however, are subject to a number of important qualifications. (See "Subsequent Events" in Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.)(see ‘‘(c)’’ below).

	(c)	Redemption of the 9% Senior Notes due 2006 (the ‘‘9% Senior Notes’’):

The 9% Senior Notes, due 2006 (the "9% Senior Notes") areprior to their redemption in April 2005, were senior unsecured obligations of Products Corporation and rankranked equally in right of payment with all existing and future senior debt of Products Corporation, including the 8 1/8%9½% Senior Notes, the indebtedness under the 2004 Credit Agreement and the indebtedness under the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit and were senior to the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes and to all future subordinated indebtedness of Products Corporation. The 9% Senior Notes were effectively subordinated to outstanding indebtedness and other liabilities of Products Corporation's subsidiaries. Interest was payable on May 1 and November 1.

The principal amount of $75.5 million outstanding of the 9% Senior Notes was redeemed in April 2005. The aggregate redemption price of the 9% Senior Notes was $79.8 million, which constituted the principal amount, interest payable on the 9% Senior Notes and the applicable premium.

In connection with the redemption of the 9% Senior Notes and the redemption of the 8 1/8% Senior Notes, the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $1.5 million.

	(d)	9½% Senior Notes due 2011:

Products Corporation issued $310.0 million aggregate principal amount of 9½% Senior Notes due 2011 (the ‘‘Original 9½% Senior Notes’’) pursuant to an indenture, dated as of March 16, 2005, by and between Products Corporation and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee. This issuance and the related transactions extended the maturities of Products Corporation's debt that would have otherwise been due in 2006.

The proceeds from the Original 9½% Senior Notes were used to prepay $100.0 million of indebtedness outstanding under the Term Loan Facility of Products Corporation’s 2004 Credit Agreement, together with accrued interest and the associated $5.0 million prepayment fee and to pay $7.0 million in certain fees and expenses associated with the issuance of the Original 9½% Senior Notes. The remaining $197.9 million of proceeds from the Original 9½% Senior Notes was placed in a debt defeasance trust and, in April 2005, used to redeem $116.2 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of Products Corporation’s 8 1/8% Senior Notes, plus accrued interest, and $75.5 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of Products Corporation’s 9% Senior Notes, plus accrued interest and the applicable premium. The aggregate redemption amounts for the 8 1/8% Senior Notes and 9% Senior Notes were $118.1 million and $79.8 million, respectively, which constituted the principal amount and interest payable on the 8 1/8% Senior Notes and the 9% Senior Notes up to, but not including, the redemption date, and, with respect to the 9% Senior Notes, the applicable premium. In connection with the redemption, the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $1.5 million. Amounts prepaid under the Term Loan Facility permanently reduced the commitment and are not available for future borrowings. In June 2005, all of the Original 9½% Senior Notes were exchanged for new 9½% Senior Notes (the ‘‘March 2005 9½% Senior Notes’’), which have substantially identical terms to the Original 9½% Senior Notes, except that the March 2005 9½% Senior Notes are registered with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the ‘‘Securities Act’’), and the transfer restrictions and registration rights applicable to the Original 9½% Senior Notes do not apply to the March 2005 9½% Senior Notes.

In August 2005, Products Corporation issued $80.0 million aggregate principal amount of additional 9½% Senior Notes due 2011, which priced at 95¼% of par (the ‘‘Additional 9½% Senior Notes’’) in a private placement to institutional buyers, as additional notes pursuant to the same indenture governing the Original 9½% Senior Notes. The issuance of the Additional 9½% Senior Notes constituted a further issuance of, are the same series as, and will vote on any matters submitted to note holders with, the Original 9½% Senior Notes. The Company used the proceeds of this issuance to help fund investments in the Company’s brand initiatives and for general corporate purposes, as well as to pay fees and expenses in connection with the issuance of the Additional 9½% Senior Notes and any outstanding fees and expenses in connection with the issuance of and exchange offer for the Original 9½% Senior Notes.

On December 27, 2005, all of the Additional 9½% Senior Notes issued by Products Corporation were exchanged for new 9½% Senior Notes (the ‘‘August 2005 9½% Senior Notes’’), which have substantially identical terms to the Additional 9½% Senior Notes, except that the August 2005 9½% Senior Notes are registered with the SEC under the Securities Act, and the transfer restrictions and registration rights applicable to the Additional 9½% Senior Notes do not apply to the August 2005 9½% Senior Notes (which are collectively referred to with the March 2005 9½% Senior Notes as the ‘‘9½% Senior Notes’’).

The 9½% Senior Notes are senior unsecured obligations of Products Corporation ranking equally in right of payment with any of Products Corporation's present and future senior indebtedness, including the indebtedness under the 2004 Credit Agreement and the indebtedness under the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit, and are senior to the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes and to all future subordinated indebtedness of Products Corporation. The 9%9½% Senior Notes are effectively subordinated to the outstanding indebtedness and other liabilities of Products Corporation'sCorporation’s subsidiaries. InterestThe 9½% Senior Notes bear interest at an annual rate of 9½%, which is payable on MayApril 1 and November 1.

October 1 of each year, commencing with October 1, 2005. The 9%9½% Senior Notes are due November 2006 andindenture provides that Products Corporation may be redeemedredeem the 9½% Senior Notes at theits option, of Products Corporation in whole or in part, at any time on or after NovemberApril 1, 20022008, at the redemption prices set forth in the 9%9½% Senior Notes indentureindenture. In addition, at any time prior to April 1, 2008 Products Corporation is entitled to redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the 9½% Senior Notes at a redemption price of 109.5% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption. The 2004 Credit Agreement requiresredemption, with, to the extent actually received, the net cash proceeds of one or more public equity offerings, provided that Products Corporation redeem, repurchase or defease in full on or before July 31, 2006at least 65% of the 9% Senior Notes. Otherwise, the 2004 Credit Facilities will terminate and all amounts outstanding under the 2004 Credit Facilities will become due on such date. In 2004, approximately $174.5aggregate principal amount of the 9%9½% Senior Notes were exchanged for Revlon Class A Common Stock inissued remains outstanding immediately after giving effect to such redemption. In addition, the Revlon Exchange Transactions, as discussed below.

Upon a change of control, as defined in the 9%9½% Senior Notes indenture provides that Products Corporation will have the optionis entitled to redeem the 9%9½% Senior Notes in wholeat any time or from time to time prior to April 1, 2008 at a redemption price per note equal to the sum of (1) the then outstanding principal amount thereof, plus (2) accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon to the date of redemption, plus (3) the greater of (i) 1.0% of the then

outstanding principal amount of such note and (ii) the excess of (A) the present value at such redemption date of (1) the redemption price of such note on April 1, 2008 (exclusive of any accrued interest) plus (2) all required remaining scheduled interest payments due on such note through April 1, 2008, computed using a discount rate equal to the applicable premium, astreasury rate plus 75 basis points, over (B) the then outstanding principal amount of such note. Pursuant to the 9½% Senior Notes indenture, upon a Change of Control (as defined in the 9%9½% Senior Notes indenture, and, subject to certain conditions,indenture), each holder of the 9%9½% Senior Notes will havehas the right to require Products Corporation to make an offer to repurchase all or a portion of such holder's 9%9½% Senior Notes at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof,of such holder's 9½% Senior Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon to the date of repurchase.

The 9%9½% Senior Notes indenture contains covenants that, among other things,which, subject to certain exceptions, limit (i) the issuance of additional debt and redeemable stock by Products Corporation, (ii) the incurrence of liens, (iii) the issuance of debt and preferred stock by Products Corporation's subsidiaries, (iv) the payment of dividends on capital stockability of Products Corporation and its subsidiaries to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends on or redeem or repurchase stock, engage in certain asset sales, make certain types of investments and the redemption of capital stock of Products Corporation and certain subordinated obligations, (v) the sale of assets and subsidiary stock, (vi)other restricted payments, engage in transactions with affiliates, restrict dividends or payments from subsidiaries and (vii) consolidations, mergers and transfers of all or substantially all Products Corporation'screate liens on their assets. The 9% Senior Notes indenture also prohibits certain restrictions on distributions from subsidiaries. All of these limitations and prohibitions, however, are subject to a number of important qualifications. (See "Subsequent Events" in Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.)qualifications and exceptions. The 9½% Senior Notes indenture contains customary events of default (see below item (e) for details).

	(e)	The 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008 (the ‘‘8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes’’):

(d) The 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008 (the "8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes") are general unsecured obligations of Products Corporation and (i) are (i) subordinate in right of payment to all existing and future senior debt of Products Corporation, including the 9% Senior Notes, the 8 1/8%9½% Senior Notes, the indebtedness under the 2004 Credit Agreement and the indebtedness under the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit, (ii) rank equally in right of payment with all future senior subordinated debt, if any, of Products Corporation and (iii) are senior in right of payment to all future junior subordinated debt, if any, of Products Corporation. The 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes are effectively subordinated to the outstanding indebtedness and other liabilities of Products Corporation's subsidiaries. Interest is payable on February 1 and August 1.

The 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes are due February 2008 and may be redeemed at the option of Products Corporation in whole or from time to time in part at any time on or after February 1, 2003 at the redemption prices set forth in the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes indenture, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption. The 2004 Credit Agreement requires that Products Corporation redeem, repurchase or defease on or before October 30, 2007 the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes such that not more than $25.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes remains outstanding. Otherwise, the 2004 Credit Facilities will terminate and all amounts outstanding under the 2004 Credit Facilities will become due on such date. In 2004, approximately $322.9 million principal amount of the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes were exchanged for Revlon Class A Common Stock in the Revlon Exchange Transactions, as discussed below. See Note 19, ‘‘Subsequent Events’’, regarding the Company’s plans to redeem, repurchase or defease approximately $110 million of the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes.

Upon a Change of Control, as defined in the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes indenture, Products Corporation will have the option to redeem the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes in whole at a redemption price equal to the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon to the date of redemption, plus the applicable premium, as defined in the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes indenture, and, subject to certain conditions, each holder of the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes will have the right to require Products Corporation to repurchase all or a portion of such holder's 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon to the date of repurchase.

The 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes indenture contains covenants that, among other things, limit (i) the issuance of additional debt and redeemable stock by Products Corporation, (ii) the incurrence of liens, (iii) the issuance of debt and preferred stock by Products Corporation's subsidiaries, (iv) the payment of dividends on capital stock of Products Corporation and its subsidiaries and the redemption of capital stock of Products Corporation, (v) the sale of assets and subsidiary stock, (vi) transactions with affiliates, (vii) consolidations, mergers and transfers of all or substantially all of Products Corporation's assets and

(viii) the issuance of additional subordinated debt that is senior in right of payment to the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes. The 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes indenture also prohibits certain restrictions on distributions from subsidiaries. All of these limitations and prohibitions, however, are subject to a number of important qualifications.qualifications and exceptions.

(e) The 12% Senior Secured Notes due 2005 (the "12% Senior Secured Notes") were issued by Products Corporation pursuant to an indenture dated as of November 26, 2001 among Products Corporation, the guarantors party thereto, including Revlon, Inc. as parent guarantor, and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee. The 12% Senior Secured Notes were supported by guarantees from Revlon, Inc. and, subject to certain limited exceptions, Products Corporation's domestic subsidiaries.

In July and August 2004, Products Corporation purchased and redeemed allfor each of the $363.0 aggregate principal amount outstanding of its 12% Senior Secured Notes for a purchase price of approximately $412.3 (including the applicable premium and accrued interest). In connection with the tender for and redemption of the 12% Senior Secured Notes, the Company recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $54.4, which represents the premium, fees, expenses and the write-off of deferred financing costs.

The indentures for the 8 1/8% Senior Notes, the 9%9½% Senior Notes and the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes contain customary events of default for debt instruments of such type and each includeincludes a cross acceleration provision which provides that it shall be an event of default under each such indenture if any debt (as defined in each such indenture) of Products Corporation or any of its significant subsidiaries (as defined in each such indenture) is not paid within any applicable grace period after final maturity or is

accelerated by the holders of such debt because of a default and the total principal amount of the portion of such debt that is unpaid or accelerated exceeds $25.0 million and such default continues for 10 days after notice from the trustee under each such indenture. If any such event of default occurs, the trustee under each such indenture or the holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the outstanding notes under each such indenture may declare all such notes to be due and payable immediately, provided that the holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of the outstanding notes under each such indenture may, by notice to the trustee, waive any such default or event of default and its consequences under each such indenture. In connection with the Revlon Exchange Transactions, in February 2004, Revlon, Inc. entered into a supplemental indenture pursuant to which it agreed to guarantee Products Corporation’s obligations under the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes indenture.

(f) During 2003,2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. made available a $100 term loan to Products Corporation (the "MacAndrews & Forbes $100 million term loan") with a final maturity dateLine of December 1, 2005 and interest on such loan of 12.0% was not payable in cash, but accrued and was added to the principal amount each quarter and was to be paid in full at final maturity. Additionally, MacAndrews & Forbes also provided Products Corporation with an additional $40 line of credit during 2003, which amount was originally to increase to $65 on January 1,Credit

In July 2004, (the "MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line of credit" with the MacAndrews & Forbes $100 million term loan and the MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line of credit sometimes being referred to as the "2003 MacAndrews & Forbes Loans") and which was originally to be available to Products Corporation through December 31, 2004 provided that the MacAndrews & Forbes $100 million term loan was fully drawn and Revlon, Inc. had consummated a $50 equity rights offering (the "2003 Rights Offering" pursuant to its February 2003 investment agreement with MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. (the "2003 Investment Agreement"). However, in connection with the January 2004 amendment to the 2001 Credit Agreement, Products Corporation and MacAndrews & Forbes agreed to extend the maturity of the MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line of credit to June 30, 2005 and subject to the availability of funds under such line of credit to the condition that an aggregate principal amount of $100 be drawn under the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan (as hereinafter defined). In December 2003, Revlon, Inc. announced that its Board of Directors approved two loans from MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, one to provide up to $100 (the "2004 MacAndrews & Forbes Loan"), if needed, to enable the Company to continue to implement and refine its plan, and the other to provide an additional $25 (the "$25 million MacAndrews & Forbes Loan") to be used for general corporate purposes. The 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes Loan and $25 million MacAndrews & Forbes Loan were consolidated into one term loan agreement (hereinafter referred to as the "2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan"). The 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan was a senior unsecured multiple-draw term loan at an interest rate of 12% per annum and which was on substantially the same terms as the MacAndrews & Forbes $100 million term loan provided by MacAndrews & Forbes earlier in 2003, including that interest on such loans was not to be payable in cash, but was to accrue and be added to the principal amount each quarter and was to be paid in full at final maturity on December 1, 2005, provided that the final $25 million of such loan could have been repaid at the Company's option prior to December 1, 2005. On March 25, 2004, principal and accrued interest of $109.7 under the MacAndrews & Forbes $100 million term loan and $38.9 under the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan were converted into shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock in connection with the Revlon Exchange Transactions. See discussion below.

On July 9, 2004, Products Corporation and MacAndrews & Forbes entered into an agreement, which effective as of August 10, 2004 amended, restated and consolidated the facilities for the MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line of credit (which was undrawn at such time) and the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan (the latter as(as to which after the Revlon Exchange Transactions the total term loan availability was $87)$87.0 million) into a single consolidated line of credit with availability of $152 (the "2004(as amended, the ‘‘2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit"Credit’’),. As of December 31, 2005, the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit had availability of $87.0 million. The commitment under which reducesthe 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit reduced to $87$87.0 million from $152.0 million as of July 1, 2005. In August 2005, and terminates on December 1, 2005. the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit was amended to provide that such line of credit is available to assist the Company in funding its brand initiatives. See Note 19, ‘‘Subsequent Events’’, regarding an extension of the term of the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit.

Loans are available under the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit if (i) the Multi-Currency Facility under the 2004 Credit Agreement has been substantially drawn (after taking into account anticipated needs for Local Loans (as defined in the 2004 Credit Agreement) and letters of credit), (ii) such borrowing is necessary to cause the excess borrowing base under the Multi-Currency Facility to remain greater than $30,$30.0 million, (iii) additional revolving loans are not available under the Multi-Currency Facility, or (iv) such borrowing is reasonably necessary to prevent or to cure a default or event of default under the 2004 Credit Agreement. Agreement or (v) Products Corporation requests such loan to assist in funding the Company’s investments in its brand initiatives.

Loans under the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit bear interest (which is not payable in cash but is capitalized quarterly in arrears) at a rate per annum equal to the lesser of (a) 12.0% and (b)

0.25% less than the rate payable from time to time on Eurodollar loans under the Term Loan Facility under the 2004 Credit Agreement, which onthe effective interest rate was 9.35% as of December 31, 2004 was 8.0%,2005, provided that at any time that the Eurodollar Base Rate under the 2004 Credit Agreement is equal to or greater than 3.0%, the applicable rate toon loans under the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit will be equal to the lesser of (x) 12.0% and (y) 5.25% over the Eurodollar Base Rate then in effect. As of December 31, 2005, the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit was undrawn.

During 1992, Revlon Holdings (as hereinafter defined) made an advance of $25.0 million to Products Corporation, evidenced by subordinated noninterest-bearing demand notes. The notes were subsequently

adjusted by offsets and additional amounts loaned by Revlon Holdings to Products Corporation. In March 2004, the balance of $24.1 million was exchanged for Revlon Class A Common Stock in the Revlon Exchange Transactions as discussed below.

The aggregate amounts of contractual long-term debt maturities at December 31, 2004,2005 in the years 20052006 through 20092010 and thereafter are $10.5, $191.2, $335.0, $8.0, $8.0 and $766.0, respectively.as follows:

Years ended December 31,				Long-term debt maturities
2006				$	—
2007					—
2008					327.0	(1)
2009					—
2010					700.0
Thereafter					390.0	(2)
Total long-term debt				$	1,417.0

	(1)	Amount refers to the aggregate principal balance due on the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes, which is due 2008. However, the 2004 Credit Agreement requires that Products Corporation redeem, repurchase or defease on or before October 30, 2007 the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes such that not more than $25.0 million in aggregate principal amount of such notes remain outstanding. See Note 19, ‘‘Subsequent Events’’.

	(2)	Amount refers to the principal balance due on the 9½% Senior Notes. The difference between this amount and the carrying amount is due to the issuance of the $80.0 million Additional 9½% Senior Notes at a discount, priced at 95¼% of par.

Revlon Exchange Transactions

OnIn February 11, 2004, Revlon, Inc. entered into agreements with Fidelity Management & Research Co. ("Fidelity"(‘‘Fidelity’’) and MacAndrews & Forbes confirming that if Revlon, Inc. were to commence an offer to exchange or convert certain indebtedness of Products Corporation and Revlon, Inc. preferred stock for Revlon Class A Common Stock, Fidelity and MacAndrews & Forbes would tender, or cause to be tendered, certain indebtedness in the exchange. OnIn February 12, 2004, Revlon, Inc. launched debt-for-equity exchange offers to exchange any and all of Products Corporation'sCorporation’s outstanding 8 1/8% Senior Notes, due 2006, 9% Senior Notes, due 2006, and 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008 (collectively, the "Revlon‘‘Revlon Exchange Notes"Notes’’) for shares of Revlon, Inc.'s Class A Common Stock or, under certain conditions, cash.

Fidelity and MacAndrews & Forbes agreed to tender Product Corporation's outstanding notesthe Revlon Exchange Notes at a ratio of 400 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock for each one thousand dollars principal of 8 1/8% Senior Notes or 9% Senior Notes and 300 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock for each one thousand dollars principal of 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes tendered for exchange. The agreements allowed Fidelity the right to elect to receive cash or additional shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock for accrued interest on the notes tendered while MacAndrews & Forbes received Revlon Class A Common Stock for the accrued interest. Other holders were offered the opportunity to exchange their Revlon Exchange Notes for (i) shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock at the same exchange ratios or, under certain conditions, (ii) cash up to a maximum of $150 million aggregate principal of tendered Revlon Exchange Notes, subject to proration, at $830 per one thousand dollars principal for the 8 1/8% Senior Notes, $800 per one thousand dollars principal for the 9% Senior Notes and $620 per $1,000one thousand dollars principal for the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes. Accrued interest was paid in cash or additional shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock, at the holder's option.

An aggregate of approximately $631.2 million in outstanding notes, consisting of approximately $133.8 million of 8 1/8% Senior Notes, approximately $174.5 million of the 9% Senior Notes and approximately $322.9 million of the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes were exchanged, along with the related accrued interest, for an aggregate of approximately 224.1 million shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock. These amounts included approximately $1.0 million of 9% Senior Notes and $286.7 million of 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes tendered by MacAndrews & Forbes and related entities and approximately $85.9 million of 9% Senior Notes, approximately $77.8 million of 8 1/8% Senior Notes and approximately $32.1 million of 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes tendered by funds and accounts managed by Fidelity. No cash was paid for any principal amount of notes exchanged.

MacAndrews & Forbes also received Revlon Class A Common Stock for amounts outstanding as of the March 25, 2004 closing date under the MacAndrews & Forbes $100 million term loan (approximately $109.7 million, including accrued interest), the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan (approximately $38.9 million, including accrued interest) and approximately $24.1 million in subordinated promissory notes. Amounts under the MacAndrews & Forbes $100 million term loan and 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan, werewhich exchanged at 400 shares per thousand dollars, exchanged for approximately 43.9 million shares and 15.6 million shares, respectively. Amounts under the subordinated promissory notes, werewhich exchanged at 300 shares per thousand dollars, exchanged for approximately 7.2 million shares.

Portions of the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan and the MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line of credit not exchanged remained available to Products Corporation, subject to a borrowing limitation, which was subsequently eliminated. As mentioned above, the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan and the MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line of credit were consolidated into the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit in July 2004.

REV Holdings LLC ("(‘‘REV Holdings"Holdings’’), a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, owned all 546 shares of Revlon, Inc.'s outstanding Series A preferred stock with a par value of $0.01 per share and a liquidation preference of $54.6 ("million (‘‘Revlon, Inc. Series A Preferred Stock"Stock’’) and all 4,333 shares of Revlon, Inc.'s outstanding Series B convertible preferred stock, with a par value of $0.01 per share (‘‘Revlon, Inc. Series B Preferred Stock’’), and which were convertible into 433,333 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock ("Revlon, Inc. Series B Preferred Stock").Stock. As part of the Revlon Exchange Transactions, REV Holdings exchanged each $1,000 of liquidation preference of Revlon, Inc. Series A Preferred Stock for 160 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock for an aggregate of approximately 8.7 million shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock and converted its shares of Revlon, Inc. Series B Preferred Stock into an aggregate of 433,333 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock.

As a result of theThe consummation of the Revlon Exchange Transactions (other than the exchange or conversion, as the case may be, of the Revlon, Inc. Series A and Revlon, Inc. Series B Preferred Stock) on March 25, 2004 resulted in Revlon, Inc. transferredtransferring the tendered Revlon Exchange Notes and other exchanged indebtedness to Products Corporation for cancellation, which (i) reduced indebtedness and accrued and unpaid interest of $803.9approximately $804 million (as of such date) and $9.9 million, respectively, and (ii) resulted in a decrease to capital deficiency of $827.7 million, including $49.9 million as a result of the exchange of indebtedness by MacAndrews & Forbes, representingcalculated as the difference between the market value aton March 25, 2004 of the shares of Revlon, Inc. Class A Common Stock issued and the principal amount of the indebtedness exchanged, together with accrued interest thereon. Additionally, the Company recognized a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $32.0 million in connection with the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs and debt discount, estimated fees and expenses and the difference between the market value aton March 25, 2004 of the shares of Revlon, Inc. Class A Common Stock issued and the principal amount of the indebtednessdebt exchanged by third parties (other than by MacAndrews & Forbes), together with accrued interest thereon, of $15.5.$15.5 million.

OnIn February 20, 2004, Revlon, Inc. and Fidelity also entered into a stockholders agreement (the "Stockholders Agreement"‘‘Stockholders Agreement’’) pursuant to which, among other things, (i) Revlon, Inc. agreed to continue to maintain a majority of independent directors (as defined by New York Stock Exchange listing standards) on its Board of Directors, as it currently does; (ii) Revlon, Inc. would establish and maintain a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors, which it formed in March 20042004; and (iii) Revlon, Inc. agreed to certain restrictions with respect to Revlon, Inc.'s’s conducting any business or entering into any transactions or series of related transactions with any of its affiliates, any holders of 10% or more of the outstanding voting stock or any affiliates of such holders (in each case, other than its subsidiaries). This Stockholders Agreement will terminate when Fidelity ceases to be the beneficial holder of at least 5% of Revlon, Inc.'s outstanding voting stock.

OnAlso in February 20, 2004, Revlon, Inc. and MacAndrews & Forbes also entered into an investment agreement (the "2004(as amended, the ‘‘2004 Investment Agreement"Agreement’’) pursuant to which MacAndrews and Forbes committed to assisting Revlon, Inc.the Company with its goal of reducing Products Corporation'sits indebtedness by an additional $200 million in the aggregate by the end of 2004 and further by an additional $100 million in the aggregate by March 2006. Pursuant to the 2004 Investment Agreement, MacAndrews & Forbes agreed, among other things, (i) to the extent that a minimum of $150 million aggregate principal amount of notes were

not tendered in the Revlon Exchange Transaction, to back-stop the exchange offers by subscribing for additional shares of Revlon, Inc.'s Class A Common Stock at a purchase price of $2.50 per share, to the extent of any shortfall, the proceeds of which would be used to reduce Products Corporation's outstanding indebtedness; (ii) to back-stop a rights offering in an amount necessary to meet the $200 million aggregate debt reduction target by December 31, 2004, not to exceed $50 million since at least $150 million of debt reduction in the aggregate was ensured as a result of the MacAndrews & Forbes back-stop obligations discussed in (i) above; and (iii) to back-stop aan equity or rights offering in an amount necessary to meet the $300 million aggregate debt reduction target by March 31, 2006, not to exceed $100 million since at least $200 million of debt reduction in the aggregate is ensured as a result of the back-stop obligations discussed in (i) and (ii) above (such equity offerings together with the Revlon Exchange Transactions are the "Debt‘‘Debt Reduction Transactions"Transactions’’). In connection with the closing of the Revlon Exchange Transactions on March 25, 2004, MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings executed a joinder

agreement to the Revlon, Inc. registration rights agreement pursuant to which all Revlon Class A Common Stock acquired by MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings will be deemed to be registerableregistrable securities. In August 2005, in connection with Revlon, Inc.’s plan to issue $185.0 million of equity, MacAndrews & Forbes and Revlon, Inc. amended the 2004 Investment Agreement to increase MacAndrews & Forbes' commitment to purchase such equity as is necessary to ensure that Revlon, Inc. issues $185.0 million of equity. (See Note 19, ‘‘Subsequent Events’’).

In connection with consummating the Revlon Exchange Transactions, Revlon, Inc.'s announced that its previously-announced plan to launch a rights offering and use the proceeds to reduce Products Corporation's debt by a further $50 million by year-end 2004 was reduced to $9.7 million, as a result of $190.3 million of notesRevlon Exchange Notes having been exchanged in excess of the notesRevlon Exchange Notes committed to be exchanged by MacAndrews & Forbes and Fidelity under their respective support agreements. This $190.3 million more than satisfied Revlon, Inc.'s plan to reduce debt by $150 in connection withthrough the Revlon Exchange Transactions pursuantOffers (as hereinafter defined) by $150 million in addition to the Revlon Exchange Notes that were committed to be exchanged in the support agreements with MacAndrews & Forbes and Fidelity. The $40.3 million difference satisfied all but $9.7 million of the Company's plan to reduce debt (in addition to the Revlon Exchange Notes) by a further $50 million by year-end 2004. Because the costs and expenses, as well as the use of organizational resources, associated with a $9.7 million rights offering would have been unduly disproportionate, Revlon, Inc.'s support and investment agreements with MacAndrews & Forbes and Fidelity and the 2004 Investment Agreement relating to the Company's debt reduction plan were amended to enable Revlon, Inc. to satisfy the remaining $9.7 million of debt reduction as part of the final stage of the Company's debt reduction plan. Therefore, Revlon, Inc. now intends to conduct an equity offering of approximately $110 by the end of March 2006 and to use such proceeds to reduce Products Corporation's debt. Consistent with agreements between MacAndrews & Forbes and Revlon, Inc. entered into contemporaneously with the agreements relating to the Revlon Exchange Transactions, MacAndrews & Forbes agreed to back-stop the $110proposed equity offering. Under the 2004 Credit Agreement, unless Products Corporation refinances its 8 1/8% Senior Notes, with $116.1 aggregate principal amount outstanding, by October 31, 2005, the 2004 Credit Agreement would terminate on October 31, 2005. In March 2005, Revlon, Inc. and MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings amended the 2004 Investment Agreement by accelerating MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings' obligation to backstop a $109.7 equity offering to be conducted by Revlon, Inc. to October 31, 2005 from March 31, 2006 in the event that Products Corporation has not as of such date refinanced the 8 1/8% Senior Notes and, therefore, Revlon, Inc. uses an equity offering to effect such refinancing. (See "Subsequent Events" discussion inissuance. See Note 19, to the Consolidated Financial Statements.)‘‘Subsequent Events’’.

Liquidity Considerations

The Company expects that operating revenues, cash on hand, the net cash proceeds from Revlon, Inc.’s planned $75 million equity issuance described in Note 19, ‘‘Subsequent Events’’ and funds available for borrowing under the 2004 Credit Agreement, the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit and other permitted lines of credit will be sufficient to enable the Company to cover its operating expenses for 2005,2006, including cash requirements in connection with the Company'sCompany’s operations, the continued implementation of, and refinement to, the Company'sCompany’s plan, cash requirements in connection with the Company'sCompany’s restructuring programs referred to above (including as described in Note 19, ‘‘Subsequent Events’’), the Company'sCompany’s debt service requirements and regularly scheduled pension and post-retirement plan contributions. However, there can be no assurance that such funds will be sufficient to meet the Company'sCompany’s cash requirements on a consolidated basis. If the Company'sCompany’s anticipated level of revenue growth is not achieved because, for example, of decreased consumer spending in response to weak economic conditions or weakness in the mass marketmass-market cosmetics category, adverse changes in currency, increased competition from the Company'sCompany’s competitors, changes in consumer purchasing habits, including with respect to shopping channels, retailer inventory management or the Company'sCompany’s advertising and marketing plans or brand initiatives are not as successful as anticipated, or if the Company'sCompany’s expenses associated with the continued implementation of, and refinement to, the Company'sCompany’s plan exceed the anticipated level of expenses, the Company'sCompany’s current sources of funds may be insufficient to meet the Company'sCompany’s cash requirements.

The U.S. mass-market color cosmetics category during 2004 and 2003 was softer than the Company expected, declining by 2.5% in 2004 and 1.9% in 2003. Despite this softness in the U.S. mass-market color cosmetics category, based upon the Company's belief that its continued implementation of its plan is proving effective, the Company intends to continue to support its plan. Additionally, inIn the event of a decrease in demand for the Company's products, reduced sales, lack of increases in demand and sales, changes in consumer purchasing habits, including with respect to shopping channels, retailer inventory management and/or increased returns or expenses associated with the continued implementation of, and refinement to, the Company's plan exceed the Company'sexceeding its expectations, any such development, if significant, could reduce the Company's operating profitsProducts Corporation's revenues and could adversely affect its ability to comply with certain financial covenants under the 2004 Credit Agreement and in such event the Company could be required to take measures, including reducing discretionary spending.

If the Company is unable to satisfy its cash requirements from the sources identified above or comply with its debt covenants, the Company could be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as delaying the implementation of or revising aspects of its plan, including reducing or delaying purchases of wall displays or advertising or promotional expenses, reducing or delaying capital spending, delaying, reducing or revising restructuring programs (including as described in Note 19, ‘‘Subsequent Events’’), restructuring indebtedness, selling assets or operations, seeking additional capital contributions or loans from MacAndrews & Forbes, Revlon, Inc. the Company's other affiliates and/or third parties, selling additional debt securities of Products Corporation or reducing other discretionary spending. There can be no assurance that the Company would be able to take any of the actions referred to above because of a variety of commercial or market factors or constraints in the Company'sProducts Corporation's debt instruments, including, for example, market conditions being unfavorable for an equity or debt offering,issuance, additional capital contributions or loans not being available from affiliates and/or third parties, or that the transactions may not be permitted under the terms of the Company'sProducts Corporation's various debt instruments then in effect, because of restrictions on the incurrence of debt, incurrence of liens, asset dispositions and related party transactions. In addition, such actions, if taken, may not enable the Company to satisfy its cash requirements or enable Products Corporation to comply with its debt covenants if the actions do not generate a sufficient amount of additional capital.

The terms of the 2004 Credit Agreement, the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit and the indentures governing the 9½% Senior Notes and the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes, the 8 1/8% Senior Notes and the 9% Senior Notes generally restrict Products Corporation from paying dividends or making distributions, except that Products Corporation is permitted to pay dividends and make distributions to Revlon, Inc. to enable Revlon, Inc., among other things, to enable Revlon, Inc. to pay expenses incidental to being a public holding company, including, among other things, professional fees such as legal and accounting fees, regulatory fees such as CommissionSEC filing fees and other miscellaneous expenses related to being a public holding company and, subject to certain limitations, to pay dividends or make distributions in certain circumstances to finance the purchase by Revlon, Inc. of Revlonits Class A Common Stock in connection with the delivery of such Revlon Class A Common Stock to grantees under the Amended and Restated Revlon, Inc. Stock Plan.Plan (the ‘‘Stock Plan’’).

10.    Financial Instruments

10.	FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The fair value of the Company's long-term debt is based on the quoted market prices for the same issues or on the current rates offered to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturities. The estimated fair value of long-term debt (excluding amounts due to affiliates of $24.1 in 2003) at December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively, was approximately $40.0 million and $38.3 and $518.2million less than the carrying values of $1,413.4 million and $1,318.7 and $1,845.4,million, respectively.

Products Corporation also maintains standby and trade letters of credit with certain banks for various corporate purposes under which Products Corporation is obligated, of which approximately $16.0 million and $17.0 and $22.3million (including amounts available under credit agreements in effect at that time) were maintained at December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively. Included in these amounts is approximately $11.9 million and $11.0 and $10.5,million, at December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively, in standby letters of credit, which support Products Corporation's self-insurance programs. The estimated liability under such programs is accrued by Products Corporation.

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, trade receivables, notes receivable, accounts payable and short-term borrowings approximate their fair values.

11.	INCOME TAXES

11.    Income TaxesThe Company's loss before income taxes and the applicable provision (benefit) for income taxes are as follows:

				Year Ended December 31,
Loss before income taxes:				2005				2004				2003
Domestic				$	(91.5	)		$	(166.3	)		$	(136.9	)
Foreign					22.0				32.6				(16.8	)
				$	(69.5	)		$	(133.7	)		$	(153.7	)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes:
Federal				$	0.1			$	(1.7	)		$	(4.4	)
State and local					0.2				(1.0	)			0.2
Foreign					8.0				11.8				4.5
				$	8.3			$	9.1			$	0.3
Current				$	16.8			$	12.4			$	8.1
Deferred					0.1				1.6				1.9
Benefits of operating loss carryforwards					(4.8	)			(2.0	)			(1.9	)
Resolution of tax matters					(3.8	)			(2.9	)			(7.8	)
				$	8.3			$	9.1			$	0.3

The effective tax rate on loss before income taxes is reconciled to the applicable statutory federal income tax rate as follows:

				Year Ended December 31,
				2005				2004				2003
Statutory federal income tax rate					(35.0	)%			(35.0	)%			(35.0	)%
State and local taxes, net of federal income tax benefit					0.2				0.1				0.1
Foreign and U.S. tax effects attributable to operations outside the U.S.					15.6				(4.4	)			2.1
Loss on early extinguishment of debt					—				(14.8	)			—
Change in valuation allowance					36.9				61.4				38.0
Sale of businesses					—				—				—
Resolution of tax audits					(5.6	)			(2.2	)			(5.1	)
Other					(0.2	)			1.7				0.1
Effective rate					11.9	%			6.8	%			0.2	%

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2005 and 2004 are presented below:

				December 31,
				2005				2004
Deferred tax assets:
Accounts receivable, principally due to doubtful accounts				$	1.3			$	1.5
Inventories					13.6				13.0
Net operating loss carryforwards — domestic					180.8				176.8
Net operating loss carryforwards — foreign					122.9				135.4
Accruals and related reserves					1.4				4.4
Employee benefits					63.0				67.1
State and local taxes					7.6				7.6
Advertising, sales discounts and returns and coupon redemptions					50.3				36.2

				December 31,
				2005				2004
Other					34.2				29.6
Total gross deferred tax assets.					475.1				471.6
Less valuation allowance					(445.4	)			(441.6	)
Total deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance					29.7				30.0
Deferred tax liabilities:
Plant, equipment and other assets					(24.2	)			(23.5	)
Other					(1.6	)			(2.1	)
Total gross deferred tax liabilities					(25.8	)			(25.6	)
Net deferred tax assets				$	3.9			$	4.4

In assessing the recoverability of its deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable income for certain international markets and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefits of certain deductible differences existing at December 31, 2005. The valuation allowance increased by $3.8 million during 2005 and decreased by $182.7 million during 2004.

During 2005, 2004 and 2003, certain of the Company's foreign subsidiaries used operating loss carryforwards to credit the current provision for income taxes by $1.1 million, $2.0 million, and $1.9 million, respectively. Certain other foreign operations generated losses during 2005, 2004 and 2003 for which the potential tax benefit was reduced by a valuation allowance. During 2005 the Company used domestic operating loss carryforwards to credit the current provision for income taxes by $3.8 million. At December 31, 2005, the Company had tax loss carryforwards of approximately $911.3 million of which $394.6 million are foreign and $516.7 million are domestic. Of the domestic losses, $112.0 million represent tax losses generated by the Company from March 26, 2004 to December 31, 2004, and $404.7 million represent losses of the Company not absorbed by the MacAndrews & Forbes Group in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (as amended, the ‘‘Code’’) and the Treasury regulations issued thereunder, offset by losses used by the Company in 2005. The losses expire in future years as follows: 2006-$46.5 million; 2007-$119.0 million; 2008-$182.8 million; 2009-$88.0 million; 2010 and beyond−$220.3 million; and unlimited−$254.7 million. The Company could receive the benefit of such tax loss carryforwards only to the extent it has taxable income during the carryforward periods in the applicable tax jurisdictions. As a result of the closing of the Revlon Exchange Transactions, as of the end of the day on March 25, 2004, Revlon Inc., Products Corporation and its U.S. subsidiaries were no longer included in the MacAndrews & Forbes Group for federal income tax purposes (see further discussion immediately below). The Code and the Treasury regulations issued thereunder govern both the calculation of the amount and allocation to the members of the MacAndrews & Forbes Group of any consolidated federal net operating losses (‘‘CNOLs’’) of the group that will be available to offset Revlon, Inc.’s taxable income and the taxable income of its U.S. subsidiaries, including Products Corporation, for the taxable years beginning after March 25, 2004. Only the amount of any CNOLs that the MacAndrews & Forbes Group did not absorb by December 31, 2004 will be available to be allocated to Revlon, Inc. and its U.S. subsidiaries, including Products Corporation, for their taxable years beginning on March 26, 2004. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings has indicated that, after giving effect to the CNOLs that the MacAndrews & Forbes Group reported as having absorbed on its 2004 consolidated federal income tax return, $415.9 million in U.S. federal net operating losses and $15.2 million of alternative minimum tax losses were available to Revlon, Inc. and its U.S. subsidiaries, including Products Corporation, after March 25, 2004. These amounts are subject to change if the Internal Revenue Service adjusts the results of the MacAndrews & Forbes Group or if the MacAndrews & Forbes Group amends its returns for the tax years ended on or before December 31, 2004. Any losses that Revlon, Inc. and its U.S. subsidiaries,

including Products Corporation, generate after March 25, 2004 will be available to Revlon, Inc. for its use and its U.S. subsidiaries', including Products Corporation’s, use and will not be available for the use of the MacAndrews & Forbes Group.

The Company has not provided for U.S. Federal and foreign withholding taxes on $44.9 million of foreign subsidiaries' undistributed earnings as of December 31, 2005, because such earnings are intended to be indefinitely reinvested overseas. The amount of unrecognized deferred tax liabilities for temporary differences related to investments in undistributed earnings is not practicable to determine at this time.

As a result of the closing of the Revlon Exchange Transactions, as of the end of March 25, 2004, Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and their U.S. subsidiaries were no longer included in the MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings consolidated group (the "MacAndrews & Forbes Group")Group for federal income tax purposes. The MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement (as hereinafter defined) will remain in effect solely for taxable periods beginning on or after January 1, 1992, through and including March 25, 2004. In these taxable periods, Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation were included in the MacAndrews & Forbes Group, and Revlon, Inc.'s and Products Corporation's federal taxable income and loss were included in such group's consolidated tax return filed by MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings. Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation were also included in certain state and local tax returns of

MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings or its subsidiaries. In June 1992, Revlon Holdings, Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries, and MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings entered into a tax sharing agreement (as subsequently amended and restated, the "MacAndrews‘‘MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement"Agreement’’), pursuant to which MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings agreed to indemnify Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation against federal, state or local income tax liabilities of the MacAndrews & Forbes Group (other than in respect of Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation) for taxable periods beginning on or after January 1, 1992 during which Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation or a subsidiary of Products Corporation was a member of such group. Pursuant to the MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement, for all such taxable periods, Products Corporation was required to pay to Revlon, Inc., which in turn was required to pay to Revlon Holdings, amounts equal to the taxes that Products Corporation would otherwise have had to pay if it were to file separate federal, state or local income tax returns (including any amounts determined to be due as a result of a redetermination arising from an audit or otherwise of the consolidated or combined tax liability relating to any such period which was attributable to Products Corporation), except that Products Corporation was not entitled to carry back any losses to taxable periods ending prior to January 1, 1992. No payments were required by Products Corporation or Revlon, Inc. if and to the extent Products Corporation was prohibited under the terms of its 2004 Credit Agreement from making tax sharing payments to Revlon, Inc. The 2004 Credit Agreement prohibits Products Corporation from making such tax sharing payments under the MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement other than in respect of state, local and local incomefederal taxes. The MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement was amended, effective as of January 1, 2001, to eliminate a contingent payment to Revlon, Inc. under certain circumstances in return for a $10 million note by MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, with interest at 12% and interest and principal payable by MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings onin December 31, 2005. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the outstanding balance of this note receivable2005, which was $15.9 and $14.2, respectively, and is includedpaid in prepaid expenses and other in the 2004 Consolidated Balance Sheet and in other assets in the 2003 Consolidated Balance Sheet.full. As a result of tax net operating losses, and prohibitions under the 2004 Credit Agreement, there were no federal tax payments or payments in lieu of taxes pursuant to the MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement for 2004, 2003 and 2002.in respect of 2004.

Following the closing of the Revlon Exchange Transactions, Revlon, Inc. became the parent of a new consolidated group for federal income tax purposes and Products Corporation's federal taxable income and loss will be included in such group's consolidated tax returns. Accordingly, Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation entered into a tax sharing agreement (the "Revlon‘‘Revlon Tax Sharing Agreement"Agreement’’) pursuant to which Products Corporation will be required to pay to Revlon, Inc. amounts equal to the taxes that Products Corporation would otherwise have had to pay if Products Corporation were to file separate federal, state or local income tax returns, limited to the amount, and payable only at such times, as Revlon, Inc. will be required to make payments to the applicable taxing authorities. The 2004 Credit Agreement does not prohibit payments from Products Corporation to Revlon, Inc. to the extent required under the Revlon Tax Sharing Agreement. As a result of tax net operating losses, we expect that there will bewere no federal tax payments or payments in lieu of taxes from Products Corporation to Revlon, Inc. pursuant to the Revlon Tax Sharing Agreement in respect of 2004. The Company expects that there will be federal

alternative minimum tax payments of $0.1 million from Products Corporation to Revlon, Inc. pursuant to the Revlon Tax Sharing Agreement in respect of 2005.

Pursuant to the asset transfer agreement referred to in Note 15, Products Corporation assumed all tax liabilities of Revlon Holdings other than (i) certain income tax liabilities arising prior to January 1, 1992 to the extent such liabilities exceeded reserves on Revlon Holdings' books as of January 1, 1992 or were not of the nature reserved for and (ii) other tax liabilities to the extent such liabilities are related to the business and assets retained by Revlon Holdings. During the second quarter of 2003, the Company resolved various tax audits, which resulted in a tax benefit of $13.9 million, of which $6.9 million was recorded directly to capital deficiency since it relates to liabilities assumed by Products Corporation in connection with the transfer agreements related to Products Corporation's formation in 1992 (See(see Note 15)15, ‘‘Related Party Transactions’’). During 2004, the Company resolved various state and federal tax audits and determined that certain tax liabilities were no longer probable, which resulted in a tax benefit of $19.3 million, of which $16.4 million was recorded to capital deficiency since it relates to liabilities assumed by Products Corporation in connection with the transfer agreements related to Products Corporation's formation in 1992 (See(see Note 15)15, ‘‘Related Party Transactions’’).

The Company's loss before income taxes and the applicable provision (benefit) for income taxes are as follows:

				Year Ended December 31,
				2004				2003				2002
Loss before income taxes:
Domestic				$	(166.3	)		$	(136.9	)		$	(208.5	)
Foreign					32.6				(16.8	)			(68.7	)
				$	(133.7	)		$	(153.7	)		$	(277.2	)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes:
Federal				$	(1.7	)		$	(4.4	)		$	(0.9	)
State and local					(1.0	)			0.2				0.2
Foreign					11.8				4.5				5.3
				$	9.1			$	0.3			$	4.6
Current				$	12.4			$	8.1			$	7.8
Deferred					1.6				1.9				(1.2	)
Benefits of operating loss carryforwards					(2.0	)			(1.9	)			(2.0	)
Resolutions of tax audits					(2.9	)			(7.8	)			—
				$	9.1			$	0.3			$	4.6

The effective tax rate on loss before income taxes is reconciled to the applicable statutory federal income tax rate as follows:

				Year Ended December 31,
				2004				2003				2002
Statutory federal income tax rate					(35.0	)%			(35.0	)%			(35.0	)%
State and local taxes, net of federal income tax benefit					0.1				0.1				0.1
Foreign and U.S. tax effects attributable to operations outside the U.S					(4.4	)			2.1				(4.1	)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt					(14.8	)			—				—
Change in valuation allowance					61.4				38.0				44.2
Sale of businesses					—				—				(3.2	)
Resolutions of tax audits					(2.2	)			(5.1	)			—
Other					1.7				0.1				(0.3	)
Effective rate					6.8	%			0.2	%			1.7	%

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2004 and 2003 are presented below:

				December 31,
				2004				2003
Deferred tax assets:
Accounts receivable, principally due to doubtful accounts				$	1.5			$	2.2
Inventories					13.0				14.9
Net operating loss carryforwards — domestic					176.8				318.6
Net operating loss carryforwards — foreign					135.4				135.5
Accruals and related reserves					4.4				2.9
Employee benefits					67.1				70.1
State and local taxes					7.6				12.6
Advertising, sales discounts and returns and coupon redemptions					36.2				35.7
Capital loss carryover					—				7.3
Deferred interest expense					—				28.5
Other					29.6				30.5
Total gross deferred tax assets					471.6				658.8
Less valuation allowance					(441.6	)			(624.3	)
Net deferred tax assets					30.0				34.5
Deferred tax liabilities:
Plant, equipment and other assets					(23.5	)			(27.0	)
Other					(2.1	)			(2.4	)
Total gross deferred tax liabilities					(25.6	)			(29.4	)
Net deferred tax assets				$	4.4			$	5.1

In assessing the recoverability of its deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable income for certain international markets and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes it is more likely than not that During 2005, the Company will realize the benefits ofresolved various tax matters and determined certain deductible differences existing at December 31, 2004.

The valuation allowance decreased by $182.7 during 2004 and increased by $59.7 during 2003.

During 2004, 2003 and 2002, certain of the Company's foreign subsidiaries used operating loss carryforwards to credit the current provision for income taxes by $2.0, $1.9, and $2.0, respectively. Certain other foreign operations generated losses during 2004, 2003 and 2002 for which the potential tax benefit was reduced by a valuation allowance. At December 31, 2004, the Company had tax loss carryforwards of approximately $932.1 of which $427.0 are foreign and $505.1 are domestic. Of the domestic losses, $94.9 represents tax losses generated by the Company from March 26, 2004 to December 31, 2004 and $410.2 represents losses of the Company not anticipated to be absorbed by the MacAndrews and Forbes Group in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (as amended, the "Code") and the Treasury regulations issued thereunder. The losses expire in future years as follows: 2005-$42.6; 2006-$60.9; 2007-$127.7; 2008-$190.7; 2009 and beyond-$260.0; and unlimited-$250.2. The Company could receive the benefit of such tax loss carryforwards only to the extent it has taxable income during the carryforward periods in the applicable tax jurisdictions. As a result of the closing of the Revlon Exchange Transactions, as of the end of the day on March 25, 2004, Revlon Inc., Products Corporation and its U.S. subsidiariesliabilities were no longer includedprobable, which resulted in a tax benefit of $3.8 million, none of which was recorded to capital deficiency. In the MacAndrews & Forbes Group for federal incomenormal course of business, the Company is subject to tax purposes. The Code and the Treasury regulations issued thereunder governexaminations in both the calculation of the amount and allocation

to the members of the MacAndrews & Forbes Group of any consolidated federal net operating losses of the group ("CNOLs") that will be available to offset Revlon, Inc.'s taxable income and the taxable income of its U.S. subsidiaries, including Products Corporation, for the taxable years beginning after March 25, 2004. Until MacAndrews & Forbes completes the filing of its 2004 consolidated federal income tax return, it is not possible to accurately determine the exact amount of CNOLs that will be allocated to Revlon, Inc. as of December 31, 2004 because various factors could increase or decrease or eliminate these amounts. These factors include, but are not limited to, the amount and nature of the income, gains or losses that the other members of the MacAndrews & Forbes Group recognize in the 2004 taxable year because any CNOLs are, pursuant to Treasury regulations, used to offset the taxable income of the MacAndrews & Forbes Group for their entire tax year ending December 31, 2004. Only the amount of any CNOLs that the MacAndrews & Forbes Group does not absorb by December 31, 2004 will be available to be allocated to Revlon, Inc. and its U.S. subsidiaries, including Products Corporation, for taxable years beginning on March 26, 2004. Subject to the foregoing, it is currently estimated that Revlon, Inc. and its U.S. subsidiaries, including Products Corporation, had approximately $410 in U.S. federal net operating losses and $10 of alternative minimum tax losses available to Revlon, Inc. and its U.S. subsidiaries, including Products Corporation, as of March 25, 2004. Any losses that Revlon, Inc. and its U.S. subsidiaries, including Products Corporation, may generate after March 25, 2004 will be available to Revlon, Inc. for its use and its U.S. subsidiaries', including Products Corporation, use and will not be available for the use of the MacAndrews & Forbes Group.

Appropriate U.S.domestic and foreign income taxesjurisdictions. The Company believes that adequate provisions have been accrued on foreign earningsmade for adjustment that have been or are expected to be remitted in the near future. Unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries which have been, or are currently intended to be, permanently reinvested in the future growth of the business are nil at December 31, 2004, excluding those amounts which, if remitted in the near future, would notmay result in significant additional taxes underfrom such tax statutes currently in effect.examinations.

12.    Savings Plan and Post-retirement Benefits

12.	SAVINGS PLAN, PENSION AND POST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS

Savings PlanPlan:

The Company offers a qualified defined contribution plan for U.S.-based employees, the Revlon Employees' Savings, Investment and Profit Sharing Plan (as amended, the "Savings Plan"‘‘Savings Plan’’), which allows eligible participants to contribute up to 25% and highly compensated employees to contribute up to 6% of qualified compensation through payroll deductions. The Company matches employee contributions at fifty cents for each dollar contributed up to the first 6% of eligible compensation. The Company may also contribute from time to time profit sharing contributions (if any) for non-bonus eligible employees. In 2005, 2004 2003 and 2002,2003, the Company made cash matching contributions to the Savings Plan of approximately $2.9 million, $2.7 million and $2.8 and $2.3million, respectively. There were no additional contributions or profit sharing contributions made during those years.

Pension:Pension Benefits:

AThe Company sponsors a number of qualified defined benefit pension plans covering a substantial portion of the Company's employees in the U.S. are covered by defined benefit pension plans., as well as certain other non-U.S. employees. The Company uses September 30 as its measurement datealso has nonqualified pension plans which provide benefits in excess of IRS limitations in the U.S. and in certain limited cases contractual benefits for plan obligations and assets.designated officers of the Company. These plans are funded from the general assets of the Company.

Other Post-retirement Benefits:

The Company also haspreviously sponsored an unfunded retiree benefit plan, which provides death benefits payable to beneficiaries of a very limited number of employees and former employees. Participation in this plan iswas limited to participants enrolled as of December 31, 1993. The Company also administers aan unfunded medical insurance plan on behalf of Revlon Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and formerly a Delaware corporation known as Revlon Holdings Inc. ("Revlon Holdings"), the cost of which has been apportioned to Revlon Holdings under the reimbursement agreements among Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. Forbes. (See Note 15, ‘‘Related Party Transactions — Reimbursement Agreements’’).

The Company uses September 30 as its measurement date for planpension and other post-retirement plans obligations and assets.

In May 2004, the FASB issued Staff Position 106-2, "Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003" which provides

guidance on the accounting for the effects of the Medicare Act. FASB Staff Position 106-2, which requires measurement of the Accumulated Postretirement Benefit Obligation ("APBO") and net periodic postretirement benefit cost to reflect the effects of the Medicare Act, supercedes FASB Staff Position 106-1. FASB Staff Position 106-2 is effective for interim or annual periods beginning after June 15, 2004. Adoption of FSP 106-2 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

Information regarding the Company's significant pension and other post-retirement plans at the dates indicated is as follows:

				Pension Plans								Other Post-retirement Benefits
				December 31,
				2004				2003				2004				2003
Change in Benefit Obligation:
Benefit obligation – September 30 of prior year				$	(518.2	)		$	(468.5	)		$	(17.1	)		$	(15.1	)
Service cost					(9.9	)			(11.8	)			(0.1	)			(0.3	)
Interest cost					(30.6	)			(29.2	)			(0.8	)			(1.0	)
Plan amendments					—				—				4.2				—
Actuarial loss					(21.8	)			(28.9	)			(0.1	)			(0.7	)
Benefits paid					26.6				25.3				1.0				1.0
Foreign exchange					(3.6	)			(4.9	)			—				(1.0	)
Plan participant contributions					(0.3	)			(0.2	)			—				—
Benefit obligation – September 30 of current year					(557.8	)			(518.2	)			(12.9	)			(17.1	)
Change in Plan Assets:
Fair value of plan assets – September 30 of prior year					298.6				253.1				—				—
Actual return (loss) on plan assets					36.6				47.0				—				—
Employer contributions					30.3				20.8				1.0				1.0
Plan participant contributions					0.3				0.2				—				—
Benefits paid					(26.5	)			(25.3	)			(1.0	)			(1.0	)
Foreign exchange					2.2				2.8				—				—
Fair value of plan assets – September 30 of current year					341.5				298.6				—				—
Funded status of plans					(216.3	)			(219.6	)			(12.9	)			(17.1	)
Amounts contributed to plans during fourth quarter					4.3				1.7				0.2				0.2
Unrecognized net loss					135.1				133.2				1.5				1.5
Unrecognized prior service cost					(4.1	)			(4.7	)			—				—
Unrecognized net transition asset					—				(0.1	)			—				—
Accrued benefit cost				$	(81.0	)		$	(89.5	)		$	(11.2	)		$	(15.4	)

				Pension Plans								Other Post-retirement Benefit Plans
				2005				2004				2005				2004
Change in Benefit Obligation:
Benefit obligation — September 30 of prior year				$	(557.8	)		$	(518.2	)		$	(13.0	)		$	(17.1	)
Service cost					(9.6	)			(9.9	)			(0.1	)			(0.1	)
Interest cost					(31.0	)			(30.6	)			(0.9	)			(0.8	)
Plan amendments					—				—				(0.5	)			4.2
Actuarial loss					(20.3	)			(21.8	)			—				(0.1	)
Benefits paid					27.5				26.6				1.1				1.0
Foreign exchange					4.9				(3.6	)			0.2				—
Plan participant contributions					(0.2	)			(0.3	)			—				—
Benefit obligation — September 30 of current year					(586.5	)			(557.8	)			(13.2	)			(12.9	)
Change in Plan Assets:
Fair value of plan assets — September 30 of prior year					341.5				298.6				—				—
Actual return (loss) on plan assets.					44.0				36.6				—				—
Employer contributions					27.5				30.3				1.1				1.0
Plan participant contributions					0.2				0.3				—				—
Benefits paid					(27.2	)			(26.5	)			(1.1	)			(1.0	)
Foreign exchange					(3.0	)			2.2				—				—
Fair value of plan assets — September 30 of current year Settlements					383.0				341.5				—				—
Funded status of plans					(203.5	)			(216.3	)			(13.2	)			(12.9	)
Amounts contributed to plans during fourth quarter					2.3				4.3				0.2				0.2
Unrecognized net loss					130.0				135.1				1.6				1.5
Unrecognized prior service cost					(3.6	)			(4.1	)			—				—
Accrued net periodic benefit cost at December 31				$	(74.8	)		$	(81.0	)		$	(11.4	)		$	(11.2	)

				December 31,
				2004				2003				2004				2003
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of:
Prepaid expenses				$	6.8			$	5.6			$	—			$	—
Accrued expenses					(23.3	)			(41.1	)			—				—
Other long-term liabilities					(179.0	)			(166.8	)			(11.2	)			(15.4	)
Intangible asset					0.3				0.4				—				—
Accumulated other comprehensive loss					113.7				112.1				—				—
Other long-term assets					0.5				0.3				—				—
				$	(81.0	)		$	(89.5	)		$	(11.2	)		$	(15.4	)

				December 31,
				2005				2004				2005				2004
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of:
Prepaid expenses				$	6.2			$	6.8			$	—			$	—
Accrued expenses					(31.6	)			(23.3	)			—				—
Other long-term liabilities					(157.2	)			(179.0	)			(11.4	)			(11.2	)
Intangible asset					0.2				0.3				—				—
Accumulated other comprehensive loss					107.0				113.7				—				—
Other long-term assets					0.6				0.5				—				—
				$	(74.8	)		$	(81.0	)		$	(11.4	)		$	(11.2	)

With respect to the above accrued net periodic benefit costs, the Company has recorded a receivable from affiliates of $1.9 million and $1.3 and $1.4million at December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively, relating to Revlon Holdings' participation in the Company's pension plans and $1.1$1.0 million and $1.1 million at December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively, for other post-retirement net periodic benefits costs attributable to Revlon Holdings.

Where the accumulated benefit obligation exceeded the related fair value of plan assets, the projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation, and fair value of plan assets for the Company's pension plans are as follows:

				December 31,
				2004				2003				2002
Projected benefit obligation				$	557.8			$	518.2			$	468.5
Accumulated benefit obligation					541.0				502.4				451.0
Fair value of plan assets					341.5				298.6				253.2

				September 30,
				2005				2004				2003
Projected benefit obligation				$	586.5			$	557.8			$	518.2
Accumulated benefit obligation					567.6				541.0				502.4
Fair value of plan assets					383.0				341.5				298.6

The components of net periodic benefit cost for the plans are as follows:

				Pension Plans												Other Post-retirement Benefits
				Year Ended December 31,
				2004				2003				2002				2004				2003				2002
Service cost				$	9.9			$	11.8			$	8.6			$	0.1			$	0.3			$	2.1
Interest cost					30.6				29.2				28.9				0.8				1.0				0.8
Expected return on plan assets					(24.7	)			(21.3	)			(24.7	)			—				—				—
Amortization of prior service cost					(0.6	)			(0.8	)			(1.2	)			—				—				—
Amortization of net transition asset					(0.1	)			(0.1	)			(0.1	)			—				—				—
Amortization of actuarial loss (gain)					9.6				9.5				2.9				—				(0.1	)			(0.1	)
Settlement loss					—				—				—				—				—				—
Curtailment loss					—				—				—				—				—				—
					24.7				28.3				14.4				0.9				1.2				2.8
Portion allocated to Holdings					(0.1	)			(0.3	)			(0.3	)			—				—				—
				$	24.6			$	28.0			$	14.1			$	0.9			$	1.2			$	2.8

Other company-sponsored post-retirement benefits consist of health and life insurance. These plans are not pre-funded.

				Pension Plans												Other Post-retirement Benefit Plans
				Years Ended December 31,
				2005				2004				2003				2005				2004				2003
Service cost				$	9.6			$	9.9			$	11.8			$	0.1			$	0.1			$	0.3
Interest cost					31.0				30.6				29.2				0.9				0.8				1.0
Expected return on plan assets					(28.3	)			(24.7	)			(21.3	)			—				—				—
Amortization of prior service cost					(0.6	)			(0.6	)			(0.8	)			—				—				—
Amortization of net transition asset					—				(0.1	)			(0.1	)			—				—				—
Amortization of actuarial loss (gain)					7.4				9.6				9.5				0.1				—				(0.1	)
					19.1				24.7				28.3				1.1				0.9				1.2
Portion allocated to Revlon Holdings					(0.1	)			(0.1	)			(0.3	)			—				—				—
				$	19.0			$	24.6			$	28.0			$	1.1			$	0.9			$	1.2

The Company recognized $3.3 million of income in 2004 related to a reduction in the liability for an International post-retirement benefit arrangement whose terms were modified.

The following weighted-average assumptions were used in accounting for both the benefit obligations and net periodic benefit cost of the pension plans:

				U.S. Plans												International Plans
				2004				2003				2002				2004				2003				2002
Discount rate					5.8	%			6.0	%			6.5	%			5.5	%			5.4	%			5.6	%
Expected return on plan assets					8.5				8.8				9.0				7.0				7.1				7.5
Rate of future compensation increases					4.0				4.0				4.3				3.7				3.6				3.5

				U.S. Plans												International Plans
				2005				2004				2003				2005				2004				2003
Discount rate					5.5	%			5.75	%			6.0	%			5.0	%			5.5	%			5.4	%
Expected return on plan assets					8.5				8.5				8.8				6.7				7.0				7.1
Rate of future compensation increases					4.0				4.0				4.0				3.7				3.7				3.6

The 5.5% discount rate for the U.S. plans was derived by reference to appropriate benchmark yields on high quality corporate bonds, with terms which approximate the duration of the benefit payments and the relevant benchmark bond indices considering the individual plan’s characteristics, such as Moody’s Aa Corporate Bond Index and the Citigroup Pension Discount Curve, to select a rate at which the Company believes the U.S. pension benefits could be effectively settled. The discount rates for the Company’s primary international plans were derived from similar local studies, in conjunction with local actuarial consultants and asset managers.

The Company considers a number of factors to determine its expected rate of return on plan assets assumption, including, without limitation, recent and historical performance of plan assets, asset allocation and other third-party studies and surveys. The Company reviewed the historical performance of plan assets over a ten-year period (from 1994 to 2004), the results of which exceeded the 8.5% rate of return assumption that the Company ultimately selected for domestic plans in 2004. The Company also considered the plan portfolios' asset allocations over a variety of time periods and compared them with third-party studies and surveys of annualized returns of similarly balanced portfolio strategies. The Company also reviewed performance of the capital markets in recent years and based upon all of the foregoing considerations and other factors and upon advice from various third parties, such as the pension plans' advisers, investment managers and actuaries,actuaries. While the Company considered recent performance and the historical performance of plan assets over a ten-year period (from 1995 to 2005), the results of which exceeded the Company’s expected rate of return, the Company’s assumptions are based primarily on its estimates of long-term, prospective rates of return. Using the aforementioned methodologies, the Company selected the 8.5% return on assets assumption used for domestic the U.S pension

plans. Differences between actual and expected asset returns are recognized in the net periodic benefit cost over the remaining service period of the active participating employees.

The rate of future compensation increases is an assumption used by the actuarial consultants for pension accounting and is determined based on the Company’s current expectation for such increases.

The following table presents domestic and foreign pension plan assets information at September 30, 2005, 2004 2003 and 2002 (the measurement date of pension plan assets):2003:

				U.S. Plans												International Plans
				2004				2003				2002				2004				2003				2002
Fair value of plan assets				$	308.9			$	272.1			$	232.2			$	32.6			$	26.5			$	21.0

				U.S. Plans												International Plans
				2005				2004				2003				2005				2004				2003
Fair value of plan assets				$	347.5			$	308.9			$	272.1			$	35.5			$	32.6			$	26.5

The Investment Committee for the Company's pension plans (the ‘‘Investment Committee’’) has adopted (and revises from time to time) an investment policy for domesticthe U.S. pension plan assets designedplans intended to meet or exceed the expected rate of return on plan assets assumption. To achieveIn connection with this objective, the pension plans retainInvestment Committee retains professional investment managers that invest plan assets in the following asset classes: equity and fixed income securities, real estate, and cash and other investments, which may include hedge funds and private equity and global balanced strategies. The International plans follow a similar methodology in conjunction with local actuarial consultants and asset managers.

The U.S. pension plans currently have the following target ranges for these asset classes, which are readjustedreviewed quarterly and considered for readjustment when an asset class weighting is outside of its target range (recognizing that these are flexible target ranges that may vary from time to time) with the goal of achieving the required return at a reasonable risk level as follows:

				Target Ranges
Asset Category:
Equity securities				37% - - 48%47%
Fixed income securities				20%17% - 30%25%
Real estate				0% - 7%8%
Cash and other investments				8% - 18%
Global balanced strategies				10%15% - 25%

The domesticU.S. pension plans weighted-average asset allocations at September 30, 20042005 and 20032004 by asset categories were as follows:

				Plan Assets at September 30,
				2004				2003
Asset Category:
Equity securities					45.7	%			57.0	%
Fixed income securities					25.5				34.0
Real estate					4.0				5.0
Cash and other investments					8.2				4.0
Global balanced strategies					16.6				—
					100.0	%			100.0	%

				2005				2004
Asset Category:
Equity securities					43.6	%			45.7	%
Fixed income securities					17.9				25.5
Real estate					4.4				4.0
Cash and other investments					13.7				8.2
Global balanced strategies					20.4				16.6
					100.0	%			100.0	%

Within the equity securities asset class, the investment policy provides for investments in a broad range of publicly-traded securities ranging from small to large capitalization stocks and domesticU.S. and international stocks. Within the fixed income securities asset class, the investment policy provides for investments in a broad range of publicly-traded debt securities ranging from U.S. Treasury issues, corporate debt securities, mortgages and asset-backed issues, as well as international debt securities. Within the real estate asset class, the investment policy provides for investment in a diversified commingled pool of real estate properties across the United States.U.S. In the cash and other investments asset class, investments may be in cash and cash equivalents and other investments, which may include hedge funds and private equity not covered in the classes listed above, provided that such investments receive approval ofare approved by the Investment Committee for the Company's pension plans prior to their selection. Within the global balanced strategies, the investment policy provides for investments in a broad range of publicly traded stocks and bonds in both domesticU.S. and international markets as described in the asset classes listed above. In addition, the global

balanced strategies can include commodities, provided that such investments receive approval ofare approved by the Investment Committee for the Company's pension plans prior to their selection.

The Investment CommitteeCommittee’s investment policy does not allow the use of derivatives for the Company's pension plans allowsspeculative purposes, but such policy does allow its investment managers to use derivatives to reduce risk exposures or to replicate exposures of a particular asset class, but does not allow the use of derivatives for speculative purposes.class.

Contributions:

The Company’s policy is to fund at least the minimum contributions required to meet applicable federal employee benefit and local laws, or to directly pay benefit payments where appropriate. During 2006, the Company expects to contribute approximately $23.3$31.6 million to its pension plans and $1.0 million to other post-retirement benefit plans in 2005.plans.

Estimated Future Benefit Payments:

The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid:

				Total Pension Benefits				Total Other Benefits
2005				$	27.9			$	1.0
2006					29.2				1.0
2007					31.2				1.0
2008					33.0				1.0
2009					34.1				1.0
Years 2010 - 2014					196.0				5.1

				Total Pension Benefits				Total Other Benefits
2006				$	28.5			$	1.1
2007					29.9				1.2
2008					31.9				1.2
2009					33.3				1.2
2010					35.0				1.2
Years 2011 to 2015					197.3				6.0

13.	STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN

13.    Stock Compensation Plan

Revlon, Inc. has a stock-based compensation plan, the Stock Plan. Products CorporationThe Company applies APB Opinion No. 25 and its related interpretations in accounting for the Stock Plan.Plan, its stock-based compensation plan. Under APB Opinion No. 25, because the exercise price of employee stock options under the Stock Plan equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation cost has been recognized. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model assuming no dividend yield, expected volatility of approximately 69% in 2004, 70% in 2003 and 71% in 2002; weighted average risk-free interest rate of 3.95% in 2004, 3.72% in 2003, and 3.86% in 2002; and a seven-year expected average liferecognized for the Stock Plan's options issued in 2004, 2003 and 2002.fiscal periods ended December 31, 2005.

OnIn June 4, 2004, the Stock Plan was amended and restated to, among other things, increase the number of shares available for grant and to reduce the maximum term of the option grants to 7 years. Awards may be granted to employees and directors of Revlon, Inc., and its subsidiaries, including the Company,Products Corporation, for up to an aggregate of 40,650,000 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock, of which up to 5,935,000 shares may be issued as restricted stock. Non-qualified options granted under the Stock Plan are granted at prices that equal or exceed the market value of Revlon Class A Common Stock on the grant date and have a term of 7 years (option grants under the Stock Plan prior to June 4, 2004 have a term of 10 years). Option grants vest over service periods that range from one to five years. Certain option grants contain provisions that allow for accelerated vesting if the Revlon Class A Common Stock closing price equals or exceeds amounts ranging from $30.00 to $40.00 per share. Additionally, certain employee stock option grants made by Revlon, Inc. to its employees vest upon a "change‘‘change in control"control’’ as defined in the respective stock option agreements.

OnIn August 10, 2004, pursuant to a pre-existing contractual commitment, the Compensation and Stock Plan Committee (the "Compensation Committee"‘‘Compensation Committee’’) of Revlon, Inc.'s’s Board of Directors granted options to a former executive officer of the Company to purchase 825,000 shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock at $3.03 per share, vesting 25% on each December 31^st thereafter and with a term of 7 years. The transaction was valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the Company recognized $1.2 million in stock compensation expense related to the grant.

Stock options:

At December 31, 2005, 2004 2003 and 20022003 there were 15,972,389, 10,415,745 and 3,792,196 and 2,847,972stock options exercisable under the Stock Plan, respectively.

A summary of the status of the Stock Plan as of December 31, 2005, 2004 2003 and 20022003 and changes during the years then ended is presented below:

				Shares (000)				Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at January 1, 2002					6,902.1			$	19.37
Granted					3,306.8				3.94
Exercised					—				—
Forfeited					(2,322.8	)			19.54
Outstanding at December 31, 2002					7,886.1				12.83
					��
Granted					1,091.6				3.00
Exercised					—				—
Forfeited					(1,270.1	)			17.43
Outstanding at December 31, 2003					7,707.6				10.66
Granted					24,517.4				3.03
Exercised					—				—
Forfeited					(1,443.3	)			9.01
Outstanding at December 31, 2004					30,781.7				4.66

				Shares (000’s)				Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at January 1, 2003					7,886.1			$	12.83
Granted					1,091.6				3.00
Exercised					—				—
Forfeited					(1,270.1	)			17.43
Outstanding at December 31, 2003					7,707.6				10.66
Granted					24,517.4				3.03
Exercised					—				—
Forfeited					(1,443.3	)			9.01
Outstanding at December 31, 2004					30,781.7				4.66
Granted					5,200.4				2.56
Exercised					(18.1	)			3.03
Forfeited					(2,930.9	)			5.59
Outstanding at December 31, 2005					33,033.1				4.25

The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during 2005, 2004 and 2003 approximated $1.38, $2.08 and 2002 approximated $2.08, $2.03, respectively, and $2.65, respectively.were estimated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

				Year Ended December 31,
				2005				2004				2003
Expected life of option				4.75 years				7.00 years				7.00 years
Risk-free interest rate				3.95%				3.95%				3.72%
Expected volatility				61%				69%				70%
Expected dividend yield				N/A				N/A				N/A

The following table summarizes information about the Stock Plan's options outstanding at December 31, 2004:2005:

				Outstanding												Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices				Number of Options (000's)				Weighted Average Years Remaining				Weighted Average Exercise Price				Number of Options (000's)				Weighted Average Exercise Price
$2.31 to $3.78					26,581.7				6.48			$	3.07				7,297.8			$	3.15
3.82 to 6.88					1,603.7				6.88				4.89				832.8				5.31
7.06 to 15.00					1,536.1				5.00				9.76				1,224.9				10.01
18.50 to 50.75					1,060.2				2.79				36.65				1,060.2				36.65
2.31 to 50.75					30,781.7												10,415.7

				Outstanding												Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices				Number of Options (000’s)				Weighted Average Years Remaining				Weighted Average Exercise Price				Number of Options (000’s)				Weighted Average Exercise Price
$  2.31        to        $  3.78					29,536.0			5.60				$2.99					12,977.5			$3.12
3.82        to            6.88					1,508.1			5.87				4.87					1,005.9			5.31
7.06        to          15.00					1,115.5			3.96				10.28					1,115.5			10.28
18.50        to          50.00					873.5			1.89				38.14					873.5			38.14
2.31        to          50.00					33,033.1												15,972.4

Restricted stock awards:

The Stock Plan also allows for awards of restricted stock to employees and directors of Revlon, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including Products Corporation. The restricted stock awards vest over service periods that range from twothree to five years. Certain restricted stock awards contain provisions that allow for accelerated vesting if the Revlon Class A Common Stock closing price equals or exceeds amounts ranging from $20.00 to $30.00 per share. In 2005, 2004 2003 and 2002,2003, Revlon, Inc. granted 50,000, 4,495,000 200,000 and 1,565,000200,000 shares, respectively, of restricted stock under the Stock Plan with weighted average fair values, based on the market price of Revlon Class A Common Stock on the dates of grant, of $3.13, $3.03 $3.01 and $3.94,$3.01, respectively. At December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, there were 5,327,5003,412,502 and 1,440,0005,327,500 shares, respectively, of restricted stock outstanding and unvested under the Stock Plan.

On February 17,In 2002, Revlon, Inc. adopted the Revlon, Inc. 2002 Supplemental Stock Plan (the "Supplemental‘‘Supplemental Stock Plan"Plan’’), the purpose of which iswas to provide Mr. Jack Stahl, the Company's President and Chief

Executive Officer, the sole eligible participant, with inducement awards to entice him to join the Company to enhance the Company's long-term performance and profitability. The Supplemental Stock Plan covers 530,000 shares of the Revlon Class A Common Stock. Awards may be made underAll of the Supplemental Stock Plan530,000 shares were issued in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted or unrestricted stock. On February 17, 2002,shares of Class A Common Stock to the Compensation Committee granted theCompany’s President and Chief Executive Officer an Award of 530,000 restricted shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock, the full amount of the shares of Revlon Class A Common Stock issuable under the Supplemental Stock Plan.in February 2002. The terms of the Supplemental Stock Plan and the foregoing grant of restricted shares to the President and Chief Executive Officer are substantially the same as the Stock Plan and the February 2002 grant of 470,000 restricted shares to him under such plan.Plan. Pursuant to the terms of the Supplemental Stock Plan, such grant was made conditioned upon his execution of the Company's standard Employee Agreement as to Confidentiality and Non-Competition.

No dividends will be paid on unvested restricted stock, provided, however, that in connection with the 2002 grants to the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer, of 470,000 shares of restricted stock under the Stock Plan and 530,000 shares of restricted stock under the Supplemental Stock Plan (of which an aggregate 750,000 shares of restricted stock remained unvested at December 31, 2004)2005), in the event any cash or in-kind distributions are made in respect of Revlon, Inc.’s Common Stock (as hereinafter defined) prior to the lapse of the restrictions on such shares, such dividends will be held by the Company and paid to Mr. Stahl when and if such restrictions lapse.

The Company amortizes amounts related to restricted stock awards using the straight-line method over the vesting period as compensation expense and recorded expense of $5.8 million, $5.2 million and $2.2 million during 2005, 2004 and $1.7 during 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively, and deferred compensation of $6.5 million and $12.5 and $4.2million at December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively, related to the restricted stock awards.

14.    Comprehensive Loss

14.	COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

The components of comprehensive loss during 2005, 2004 2003 and 20022003 are as follows:

				Foreign Currency Translation				Minimum Pension Liability				Deferred Loss – Hedging				Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Balance, January 1, 2002				$	(15.1	)		$	(46.1	)		$	0.1			$	(61.1	)
Unrealized (losses)					(4.0	)			(67.5	)			(0.7	)			(72.2	)
Reclassifications into net loss					—				—				0.6				0.6
Balance, December 31, 2002					(19.1	)			(113.6	)			—				(132.7	)
Unrealized gains (losses)					10.6				1.5				(2.9	)			9.2
Reclassifications into net loss					—				—				1.5				1.5
Balance December 31, 2003					(8.5	)			(112.1	)			(1.4	)			(122.0	)
Unrealized gains (losses)					0.6				(1.6	)			(2.8	)			(3.8	)
Reclassifications into net loss					—				—				1.5				1.5
Balance December 31, 2004				$	(7.9	)		$	(113.7	)		$	(2.7	)		$	(124.3	)

15.    Related Party Transactions

				Foreign Currency Translation				Minimum Pension Liability				Deferred Loss - - Hedging				Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Balance, January 1, 2003				$	(19.1	)		$	(113.6	)		$	—			$	(132.7	)
Unrealized (losses)					10.6				1.5				(2.9	)			9.2
Reclassifications into net loss					—				—				1.5				1.5
Balance, December 31, 2003					(8.5	)			(112.1	)			(1.4	)			(122.0	)
Unrealized gains (losses)					0.6				(1.6	)			(2.8	)			(3.8	)
Reclassifications into net loss					—				—				1.5				1.5
Balance December 31, 2004					(7.9	)			(113.7	)			(2.7	)			(124.3	)
Unrealized gains (losses)					(6.9	)			6.7				0.2				1.5
Reclassifications into net loss					0.4				—				2.2				1.1
Balance December 31, 2005				$	(14.4	)		$	(107.0	)		$	(0.3	)		$	(121.7	)

15.	RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

As of December 31, 2004,2005, MacAndrews & Forbes beneficially owned shares of Revlon, Inc.'s Common Stock having approximately 77.2%77% of the combined voting power of thesuch outstanding shares of Revlon Common Stock.shares. Revlon, Inc. in turn directly owns all 5,260 outstanding shares of Products Corporation's common stock.shares. As a result, MacAndrews & Forbes is able to elect the entire Board of Directors of Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation and control the vote on all matters submitted to a vote of Revlon, Inc.'s and Products Corporation'sCorporation’s stockholders. MacAndrews & Forbes is wholly owned by Ronald O. Perelman, Chairman of Revlon, Inc.'s’s and Products Corporation's Board of Directors.

Transfer Agreements

In June 1992, Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation entered into an asset transfer agreement with Revlon Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and formerly a Delaware corporation known as Revlon Holdings Inc. (‘‘Revlon Holdings’’) and which is an affiliate and an indirect wholly-owned

subsidiary of MacAndrews & Forbes and certain of itsRevlon Holdings’ wholly-owned subsidiaries, andsubsidiaries. Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation also entered into a real property asset transfer agreement with Revlon Holdings, and pursuantHoldings. Pursuant to such agreements, on June 24, 1992 Revlon Holdings transferred assets to Products Corporation and Products Corporation assumed all of the liabilities of Revlon Holdings, other than certain specifically excluded assets and liabilities (the liabilities excluded are referred to as the "Excluded Liabilities"‘‘Excluded Liabilities’’). Certain consumer products lines sold in demonstrator-assisted distribution channels considered not integral to Revlon, Inc.'s business and that historically had not been profitable and certain other assets and liabilities were retained by Revlon Holdings. Revlon Holdings agreed to indemnify Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation against losses arising from the Excluded Liabilities, and Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation agreed to indemnify Revlon Holdings against losses arising from the liabilities assumed by Products Corporation. The amounts reimbursed by Revlon Holdings to Products Corporation for the Excluded Liabilities for 2004, 2003 and 2002 were $0.2, $0.3 and $0.5, respectively.

Certain assets and liabilities relating to divested businesses were transferred to Products Corporation on the transfer date and any remaining balances as of December 31 of the applicable year have been reflected in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets as of such dates. At December 31,2005, 2004 and 2003 the amounts reflected in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets aggregated a net liability of nilwere $0.2 million, $0.2 million and $16.4, respectively, all of which were included in other long-term liabilities.$0.3 million, respectively.

Reimbursement Agreements

Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. (a wholly-owned subsidiary of MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings) have entered into reimbursement agreements (the "Reimbursement Agreements"‘‘Reimbursement Agreements’’) pursuant to which (i) MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. is obligated to provide (directly or through affiliates) certain professional and administrative services,

including employees, to Revlon, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including Products Corporation, and purchase services from third party providers, such as insurance, legal and accounting services and air transportation services, on behalf of Revlon, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including Products Corporation, to the extent requested by Products Corporation, and (ii) Products Corporation is obligated to provide certain professional and administrative services, including employees, to MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. (and its affiliates) and purchase services from third party providers, such as insurance and legal and accounting services, on behalf of MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. (and its affiliates) to the extent requested by MacAndrews & Forbes Inc., provided that in each case the performance of such services does not cause an unreasonable burden to MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. or Products Corporation, as the case may be. Products Corporation reimburses MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. for the allocable costs of the services purchased for or provided to Products Corporation and its subsidiaries and for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the provision of such services. MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. (or such affiliates) reimburses Products Corporation for the allocable costs of the services purchased for or provided to MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. (or such affiliates) and for the reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the purchase or provision of such services. Each of Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation, on the one hand, and MacAndrews & Forbes Inc., on the other, has agreed to indemnify the other party for losses arising out of the provision of services by it under the Reimbursement Agreements other than losses resulting from its willful misconduct or gross negligence. The Reimbursement Agreements may be terminated by either party on 90 days' notice. Products Corporation does not intend to request services under the Reimbursement Agreements unless their costs would be at least as favorable to Products Corporation as could be obtained from unaffiliated third parties. Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation participate in MacAndrews & Forbes' directors and officers liability insurance program, which covers Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation as well as MacAndrews & Forbes and its other affiliates.Forbes. The limits of coverage are available on an aggregate basis for losses to any or all of the participating companies and their respective directors and officers. Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation reimburse MacAndrews & Forbes from time to time for their allocable portion of the premiums for such coverage, which the Company believes is more favorable than the premiums Products Corporationit would pay were it to secure stand-alone coverage. The amounts paid by Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation to MacAndrews & Forbes for premiums areis included in the amounts paid under the Reimbursement Agreement.Agreements. The net amounts reimbursable byfrom (payable to) MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. to (by) Products Corporation for the services provided under the Reimbursement Agreements for 2005, 2004 and 2003, were $(3.7) million, $1.0 million and 2002, were $1.0, $(2.7) and $0.8,million, respectively.

Tax Sharing Agreements

As a result of the closing of the Revlon Exchange Transactions, as of the end of March 25, 2004, Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and their U.S. subsidiaries were no longer included in the

MacAndrews & Forbes Group for federal income tax purposes. TheSee Note 11, ‘‘Income Taxes’’, for further discussion on these agreements and related transactions in 2005, 2004 and 2003.

2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement will remain in effect solely for taxable periods beginning on or after January 1, 1992, through and including March 25, 2004. In these taxable periods, Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation were included in the MacAndrews & Forbes Group, and Revlon, Inc.'s and Products Corporation's federal taxable income and loss were included in such group's consolidated tax return filed by MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings. Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation were also included in certain state and local tax returnsLine of MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings or its subsidiaries. In June 1992, Revlon Holdings, Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries, and MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings entered into the MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement, pursuant to which MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings agreed to indemnify Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation against federal, state or local income tax liabilities of the MacAndrews & Forbes Group (other than in respect of Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation) for taxable periods beginning on or after January 1, 1992 during which Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation or a subsidiary of Products Corporation was a member of such group. Pursuant to the MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement, for all such taxable periods, Products Corporation was required to pay to Revlon, Inc., which in turn was required to pay to Revlon Holdings, amounts equal to the taxes that Products Corporation would otherwise have had to pay if it were to file separate federal, state or local income tax returns (including any amounts determined to be due as a result of a redetermination arising from an audit or otherwise of the consolidated or combined tax liability relating

to any such period which was attributable to Products Corporation), except that Products Corporation was not entitled to carry back any losses to taxable periods ending prior to January 1, 1992. No payments were required by Products Corporation or Revlon, Inc. if and to the extent Products Corporation was prohibited under the terms of its 2004 Credit Agreement from making tax sharing payments to Revlon, Inc. The 2004 Credit Agreement prohibits Products Corporation from making such tax sharing payments under the MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement other than in respect of state and local income taxes. The MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement was amended, effective as of January 1, 2001, to eliminate a contingent payment to Revlon, Inc. under certain circumstances in return for a $10 million note with interest at 12% and interest and principal payable by MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings on December 31, 2005. As a result of tax net operating losses and prohibitions under the 2004 Credit Agreement, there were no federal tax payments or payments in lieu of taxes pursuant to the MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement in respect of 2004, 2003 and 2002.

Following the closing of the Revlon Exchange Transactions, Revlon, Inc. became the parent of a new consolidated group for federal income tax purposes and Products Corporation's federal taxable income and loss will be included in such group's consolidated tax returns. Accordingly, Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation entered into the Revlon Tax Sharing Agreement pursuant to which Products Corporation will be required to pay to Revlon, Inc. amounts equal to the taxes that Products Corporation would otherwise have had to pay if Products Corporation were to file separate federal, state or local income tax returns, limited to the amount, and payable only at such times, as Revlon, Inc. will be required to make payments to the applicable taxing authorities. The 2004 Credit Agreement does not prohibit payments from Products Corporation to Revlon, Inc. to the extent required under the Revlon Tax Sharing Agreement. As a result of tax net operating losses, we expect that there will be no federal tax payments or payments in lieu of taxes by Products Corporation to Revlon, Inc. pursuant to the Revlon Tax Sharing Agreement in respect of 2004.

For a description of transactions in 2005 and 2004 with MacAndrews & Forbes in connection with the 2003 and 2004 loan agreements with MacAndrews & Forbes, see Note 9, ‘‘Long-Term Debt’’.

Refinancing Transactions

For a description of transactions in 2005 and 2004 with MacAndrews & Forbes in connection with the Debt Reduction Transactions, the Revlon Exchange Transactions and the 2004 and 2003 Investment Agreements,Agreement, see Note 9, to the Consolidated Financial Statements.‘‘Long-Term Debt’’.

Other

Pursuant to a lease dated April 2, 1993 (the "Edison Lease"‘‘Edison Lease’’), Revlon Holdings leased to Products Corporation the Edison research and development facility for a term of up to 10 years with an annual rent of $1.4 million and certain shared operating expenses payable by Products Corporation which, together with the annual rent, were not to exceed $2.0 million per year. In August 1998, Revlon Holdings sold the Edison facility to an unrelated third party, which assumed substantially all liability for environmental claims and compliance costs relating to the Edison facility, and in connection with the sale Products Corporation terminated the Edison Lease and entered into a new lease with the new owner. Revlon Holdings agreed to indemnify Products Corporation through September 1, 2013 (the term of the new lease) to the extent that rent under the new lease exceeds rent that would have been payable under the terminated Edison Lease had it not been terminated. The net amounts reimbursed by Revlon Holdings to Products Corporation with respect to the Edison facility for 2005, 2004 2003 and 20022003 were $0.3 million, $0.3 million and $1.1 and $0.2,million, respectively.

During 2005, 2004 2003 and 2002,2003, Products Corporation leased a small amount of space at certain facilities to MacAndrews & Forbes or its affiliates pursuant to occupancy agreements and leases, including space at Products Corporation's New York headquarters. The rent paid by MacAndrews & Forbes or its affiliates to Products Corporation for 2005, 2004 and 2003 and 2002 was $0.2 million, $0.3 $0.3million and $0.3 million, respectively.

The 2004 Credit Agreement is, and prior to the redemption of all ProductProducts Corporation's outstanding 12% Senior Secured Notes in July and August 2004, the 12% Senior Secured Notes were, supported by, among other things, guaranties from Revlon, Inc. and, subject to certain limited exceptions, all of the domestic subsidiaries of Products Corporation. The obligations under such guaranties are and were secured by, among other things, the capital stock of Products Corporation and, subject to certain limited exceptions, the capital stock of all of Products Corporation's domestic subsidiaries and 66% of the capital stock of Products Corporation's and its domestic subsidiaries' first-tier foreign subsidiaries. In connection

with the Revlon Exchange Transactions, on February 11, 2004, Revlon, Inc. entered into supplemental indentures pursuant to which it agreed to guarantee the obligations of Products Corporation under the indentures governing ProductProducts Corporation's 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes and, prior to their redemption in April 2005, Products Corporation’s 8 1/8% Senior Notes and 9% Senior Notes and 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes.

In March 2002, prior to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Products Corporation made an advance of $1.8 million to Mr. Stahl the Company's President and CEO, pursuant to his employment agreement, which was entered into in February 2002, for tax assistance related to a grant of restricted stock provided to Mr. Stahl pursuant to such agreement, which loan bears interest at the applicable federal rate. In May 2002, prior to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Products Corporation made an advance of $2.0 million to Mr. Stahl pursuant to his employment agreement in connection with the purchase of his principal residence in the New York City metropolitan area, which loan bears interest at the applicable federal rate. Mr. Stahl repaid $0.1 million, $0.1 million and $0.1 million of such loan during 2005, 2004 2003 and 2002,2003, respectively. Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Stahl receives from Products Corporation additional compensation payable on a monthly basis equal to the amount actually paid by him in respect

of interest and principal on such $2.0 million advance, which for 2005, 2004 2003 and 20022003 was $0.1 million, $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively. Products Corporation also pays Mr. Stahl a gross up for any taxes payable by Mr. Stahl as a result of such additional compensation, which tax gross up amount was $0.1 million, $0.1 million and $0.1 million in 2005, 2004 2003 and 2002,2003, respectively.

During 2000, prior to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Products Corporation made an advance of $0.8 million to Mr. Douglas Greeff, the Company's former Executive Vice President Strategic Finance, pursuant to his employment agreement, which loan bearsbore interest at the applicable federal rate and was payable in 5 equal annual installments on each of May 9, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, and on May 9, 2005. Mr. Greeff has fully repaid such loan, including installments of $0.2 million, $0.2 million and $0.2 million during 2005, 2004 2003 and 2002,2003, respectively. Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Greeff was entitled to receive bonuses from Products Corporation, payable on each May 9th commencing on May 9, 2001 and ending on May 9, 2005, in each case equal to the sum of the principal and interest on the advance repaid in respect of such year by Mr. Greeff, provided that he remained employed by Products Corporation on each such May 9^th, which bonus installments were paid to Mr. Greeff in each of May 2004, 2003 and 2002.Greeff. Pursuant to the terms of Mr. Greeff's separation agreement, as a result of the fact that Mr. Greeff ceased employment in February 2005, Mr. Greeff is scheduled to repayrepaid the remaining amount of the 2000 Loan byloan on or about May 9, 2005 and Products Corporation is expected to paypaid the final bonus installment to Mr. Greeff on or about May 9,12, 2005.

In February 2002, Products Corporation entered into a separation agreement with Mr. Jeffrey M. Nugent, the Company's former PresidentDuring 2005, 2004 and CEO, pursuant to which the parties agreed to an offset of obligations whereby Products Corporation canceled Mr. Nugent's obligation to repay principal and interest on a loan in the amount of $0.5 that was made in installments of $0.4 in 1999 and $0.1 in 2000 pursuant to Mr. Nugent's employment agreement, in exchange for the cancellation of Products Corporation's obligation to pay Mr. Nugent a special bonus on January 15, 2003 pursuant to his employment agreement.

During 2004, 2003 and 2002 Products Corporation made payments of $0.6 million, $0.4 $0.3million and $0.3 million, respectively, to Ms. Ellen Barkin (spouse of Mr. Perelman) under a written agreement pursuant to which she provides voiceover services for certain of the Company's advertisements, which payments were competitive with industry rates for similarly situated talent.

The law firm of which Mr. Edward Landau was Of Counsel to and from which he retired in February 2003, Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen LLP, did not provide any legal services to Products Corporation during 2004 or 2003, but did provide such services in 2002. It is anticipated that such firm could continue to provide such services in the future.

Products Corporation employed Mr. Perelman's daughter in a marketing position through June 2004, with compensation paid in each of 2004 2003 and 20022003 of less than $0.1.$0.1 million.

Products Corporation employed Mr. Drapkin's daughter in a marketing position through June 2004, with compensation paid in each of 2004 2003 and 20022003 of less than $0.1.$0.1 million.

During 20042005 and 2003,2004, Products Corporation paid $1.0 million and $0.1,$1.0 million, respectively, to a nationally-recognized security services company, in which MacAndrews & Forbes has a controlling interest, for

security officer services. Products Corporation's decision to engage such firm was based upon its expertise in the field of security services, and the rates were competitive with industry rates for similarly situated security firms.

16.    Commitments and Contingencies

16.	COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company currently leases manufacturing, executive, including research and development, and sales facilities and various types of equipment under operating and capital lease agreements. Rental expense was $17.3 million, $19.4 million and $27.2 and $27.5million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 2003 and 2002,2003, respectively. Minimum rental commitments under all noncancelable leases, including those pertaining to idled facilities, with remaining lease terms in excess of one year from December 31, 20042005 aggregated $151.4; such$136.4 million. Such commitments for each of the five years and thereafter subsequent to December 31, 20042005 are $17.1,$17.9, $18.1, $16.5, $18.0, $16.8$15.5, $14.2 and $14.8,$54.2 million, respectively. Such amounts exclude the minimum rentals to be received by the Company in the future under noncancelable subleases of $0.3.

The Company and its subsidiaries are defendants in litigation and proceedings involving various matters. In the opinion of the Company's management, based upon advice of its counsel handling such litigation and proceedings, adverse outcomes, if any, will not result in a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

The Company is involved in various routine legal proceedings incident to the ordinary course of its business. The Company believes that the outcome of all pending legal proceedings in the aggregate is unlikely to have a material adverse effect on the business or consolidated financial condition of the Company.

17.    Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)

17.	QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

The following is a summary of the unaudited quarterly results of operations:

				Year Ended December 31, 2004
				1st Quarter				2nd Quarter				3rd Quarter				4th Quarter
Net sales				$	308.4			$	316.1			$	294.4			$	378.3
Gross profit					191.3				197.7				176.5				246.4
Net (loss) income (a)					(58.3	)			(38.9	)			(91.8	)			46.2

				Year Ended December 31, 2003																		Year Ended December 31, 2005
				1st Quarter				2nd Quarter				3rd Quarter				4th Quarter (b)						1st Quarter				2nd Quarter				3rd Quarter				4th Quarter
Net sales	Net sales			$	292.0			$	322.3			$	316.5			$	368.5		Net sales			$	300.9			$	318.3			$	275.3			$	437.8
Gross profit	Gross profit				180.5				197.1				189.4				231.2		Gross profit				186.7				199.4				158.3				279.8
Net loss					(48.4	)			(38.2	)			(54.7	)			(12.7	)
Net (loss) income (a)																			Net (loss) income (a)				(46.9	)			(36.0	)			(61.6	)			66.7
				Year Ended December 31, 2004
																						1st Quarter				2nd Quarter				3rd Quarter				4th Quarter
Net sales																			Net sales			$	308.4			$	316.1			$	294.4			$	378.3
Gross profit																			Gross profit				191.3				197.7				176.5				246.4
Net (loss) income (b)																			Net (loss) income (b)				(58.3	)			(38.9	)			(91.8	)			46.2

	(a)	During 2005, primarily in the third and fourth quarters, the Company recorded upfront launch costs of approximately $62 million associated with the launch of its brand initiatives. In addition, primarily during the first and second quarters of 2005, the Company recorded an aggregate $9.0 million loss on early extinguishment of debt, which includes a $5.0 million prepayment fee related to the prepayment of $100.0 million of indebtedness outstanding under the Term Loan Facility of the 2004 Credit Agreement with a portion of the proceeds from the issuance of the Original 9½% Senior Notes, the loss on the redemption of Products Corporation’s 8 1/8% Senior Notes and 9% Senior Notes of $1.5 million in the aggregate, as well as the write-off of the portion of deferred financing costs related to such prepaid amount.

	(b)	During 2004, primarily in the first and third quarters, the Company incurred $90.7 million in losses on the early extinguishment of debt consisting of the loss on exchange for equity of certain indebtedness in the Revlon Exchange Transactions and fees, expenses, premiums and the write-off of deferred financing costs related to the Revlon Exchange Transactions, the tender for and redemption of the 12% Senior Secured Notes and the repayment of the 2001 Credit Agreement.

(b)18.	During 2003 the Company recorded expenses of approximately $31 related to the implementation of the stabilization and growth phase of the Company's plan.GEOGRAPHIC, FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION

18.    Geographic, Financial and Other Information

The Company manages its business on the basis of one reportable operating segment. See Note 1, ‘‘Summary of Significant Accounting Policies’’, for a brief description of the Company's business. As of December 31, 2004,2005, the Company had operations established in 16 countries outside of the U.S. and its products are sold throughout the world. The Company's results of operations and the value of its foreign assets and liabilities may be adversely affected by, among other things, weak economic conditions, political uncertainties, military actions, terrorist

activities, adverse currency fluctuations, competitive activities, retailer inventory management and changes in consumer purchasing habits, including with respect to shopping channels. Net sales by geographic area are presented by attributing revenues from external customers on the basis of where the products are sold. During 2005, 2004 2003 and 2002,2003, Wal-Mart and its affiliates worldwide accounted for approximately 21.0%24.0%, 20.6%21.0% and 22.5%20.6%, respectively, of the Company's consolidated net sales. The Company expects that Wal-Mart and a small number of other customers will, in the aggregate, continue to account for a large portion of the Company's net sales. As is customary in the consumer products industry, none of the Company’s customers is under an obligation to continue purchasing products from the Company in the future. Although the loss of Wal-Mart or one or more of the Company's other customers that may account for a significant portion of the Company's sales, or any significant decrease in sales to these customers or any significant decrease in retail display space in any of these customers' stores, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations, the Company has no reason to believe that any such loss of customer or decrease in sales will occur.

Geographic Areas:

				Year Ended December 31,
				2004				2003				2002
Net sales:
United States				$	792.7			$	837.0			$	716.1
Canada					63.0				53.6				44.0
United States and Canada					855.7				890.6				760.1
International					441.5				408.7				359.3
				$	1,297.2			$	1,299.3			$	1,119.4

				December 31,														Year Ended December 31,
				2004				2003				2002						2005				2004				2003
Long-lived assets:
Geographic area:															Geographic area:
Net sales:															Net sales:
United States	United States			$	371.3			$	378.7			$	375.2		United States			$	788.3			$	792.7			$	837.0
Canada	Canada				4.2				3.9				3.5		Canada				68.8				63.0				53.6
United States and Canada	United States and Canada				375.5				382.6				378.7		United States and Canada				857.1				855.7				890.6
International	International				79.2				79.8				74.6		International				475.2				441.5				408.7
				$	454.7			$	462.4			$	453.3					$	1,332.3			$	1,297.2			$	1,299.3
				December 31,
																		2005				2004				2003
Long-lived assets — net:															Long-lived assets — net:
United States															United States			$	366.9			$	371.3			$	378.7
Canada															Canada				3.8				4.2				3.9
United States and Canada															United States and Canada				370.7				375.5				382.6
International															International				81.0				79.2				79.8
																		$	451.7			$	454.7			$	462.4
																		Year Ended December 31,
																		2005				2004				2003
Classes of similar products:															Classes of similar products:
Net sales:															Net sales:
Cosmetics, skincare and fragrances															Cosmetics, skincare and fragrances			$	904.3			$	874.7			$	872.4
Personal care															Personal care				428.0				422.5				426.9
																		$	1,332.3			$	1,297.2			$	1,299.3

19.	SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

ClassesIn February 2006, Revlon, Inc. announced that it had launched and plans to complete in March 2006, a $110 million rights offering that would allow stockholders to purchase additional shares of Similar Products:Class A Common Stock. Pursuant to the rights offering, Revlon, Inc. distributed, at no charge, one transferable subscription right for each share of Class A Common Stock and Revlon, Inc.’s Class B common stock, with a par value of $0.01 per share (together with the Class A Common Stock, the ‘‘Common Stock’’) held by each stockholder of record as of 5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on February 13, 2006, the record date for the rights offering. Each subscription right entitles the holder of such right to purchase 0.1057 shares of Class A Common Stock. As there will be no fractional shares issued, a rights holder will need to hold at least ten subscription rights to acquire one share of Class A Common Stock in the rights offering. The subscription price for each share of Class A Common Stock is $2.80 per share, which subscription price was recommended by a committee of Revlon, Inc.'s Board of Directors composed solely of independent directors within the meaning of Section 303A.02 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual and the Board's Guidelines for Assessing Director Independence and ratified and confirmed by the Board of Directors (with Messrs. Perelman, Gittis and Drapkin recusing themselves as they are officers of MacAndrews & Forbes).

				Year Ended December 31,
				2004				2003				2002
Net sales:
Cosmetics, skin care and fragrances				$	874.7			$	872.4			$	723.9
Personal care					422.5				426.9				395.5
				$	1,297.2			$	1,299.3			$	1,119.4

Under an over-subscription privilege, each rights holder that exercises its basic subscription privilege in full may also subscribe in the rights offering for additional shares of Class A Common Stock at the same subscription price of $2.80 per share, to the extent that other rights holders do not exercise their subscription rights in full. If a sufficient number of shares are not available to fully satisfy the over-subscription privilege requests, the available shares will be sold pro-rata among subscription rights holders who exercised their over-subscription privilege, based on the number of shares each subscription rights holder subscribed for under the basic subscription privilege.

19.    Subsequent EventsMacAndrews & Forbes has agreed not to exercise its basic subscription privilege. Instead pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement between MacAndrews & Forbes and Revlon, Inc., MacAndrews & Forbes has agreed to purchase at the same $2.80 subscription price, in a private placement directly from Revlon, Inc., the shares of Class A Common Stock that it would otherwise have been entitled to subscribe for pursuant to its basic subscription privilege in the rights offering (equal to approximately 60% of the shares available for purchase in the rights offering, or approximately $66 million). MacAndrews & Forbes also agreed not to exercise its over-subscription privilege in the rights offering, which will maximize the shares available for purchase by other stockholders pursuant to their over-subscription privileges.

On March 8, 2005,If any shares in the rights offering remain following the exercise of the basic subscription privilege and the over-subscription privilege by rights holders other than MacAndrews & Forbes, MacAndrews & Forbes will back-stop the rights offering by purchasing at the same $2.80 subscription price, also in a private placement directly from Revlon, Inc., the remaining shares of Class A Common Stock offered but not purchased by other rights holders. As a result of this back-stop, Revlon, Inc. is assured of raising $110 million in gross proceeds through a combination of the rights offering and the sale of shares, in a private placement and, if necessary, the back-stop, to MacAndrews & Forbes.

Revlon, Inc. expects to transfer the proceeds from the rights offering to Products Corporation which it would use, together with available cash, to redeem approximately $110 million aggregate principal amount of Products Corporation's 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes, in satisfaction of the applicable requirements under Products Corporation's 2004 Credit Agreement.

Revlon, Inc. also announced in February 2006 that it intends to conduct a further $75 million equity issuance through an underwritten public offering by June 30, 2006. In connection with such further equity issuance, Revlon, Inc. also announced in February 2006 that it had entered into an amendment to its intention2004 Investment Agreement with MacAndrews & Forbes, which extends MacAndrews & Forbes’ back-stop of Revlon, Inc.’s planned $75 million equity issuance from March 31, 2006 until June 30, 2006 to, among other things, provide Revlon, Inc. with sufficient time to complete, following the rights offering, an underwritten public offering of its Class A Common Stock, the proceeds of which would be transferred by Revlon, Inc. to Products Corporation to be available for general corporate purposes. Revlon, Inc. also announced that Products Corporation had entered into an amendment to its 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit extending the term of such agreement until the consummation of Revlon, Inc.’s planned $75 million equity issuance.

Also in February 2006, Revlon, Inc. separately announced an organizational realignment largely involving the consolidation of certain functions within its sales, marketing and creative groups, as well as certain headquarters functions, which changes are designed to streamline internal processes, enabling the Company to continue to be more effective and efficient in meeting the needs of its consumers and retail customers. The Company indicated that it expects to take a charge in 2006 of approximately $10 million to cover severance and other expenses associated with the organizational realignment, with the vast majority of the charge to impact results in the first quarter of 2005 a refinancing of its 8 1/8% Senior Notes and 9% Senior Notes, which currently have outstanding an aggregate principal amount of $116.2 and $75.5, respectively. There can be no assurances that Products Corporation will complete such refinancing.

Although Products Corporation intends to refinance its 8 1/8% Senior Notes in the first quarter of 2005, in the event Products Corporation does not do so, it could refinance such notes2006. The Company estimates significant ongoing annualized savings associated with the proceeds of a debt or equity offering. In order to facilitate any such refinancing the Company may pursue through an equity offering, in March 2005, organizational realignment.

Revlon, Inc. and MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings amended MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings' obligation under the 2004 Investment Agreement to backstop a $109.7 equity offering to be conducted by Revlon, Inc. by accelerating such obligation to October 31, 2005 from March 31,also announced in February 2006 in the event that Products Corporation had notentered into an amendment to its 2004 Credit Agreement which enables Products Corporation to exclude, from various financial covenants, certain charges in connection with the aforementioned organizational realignment, as well as some start-up investment charges incurred by the Company in 2005 related to the launch of its new Vital Radiance brand and the re-launch of Almay. Specifically, such date refinancedamendment provides for the 8 1/8%add-back to the definition of ‘‘EBITDA’’ the lesser of (i) $50 million; or (ii) the cumulative one-time charges associated with (a) the aforementioned organizational realignment; and (b) the non-recurring costs in the third and fourth quarters of 2005 associated with the launch of the Company's new Vital Radiance brand and the re-launch of Almay. Under the 2004 Credit Agreement, such definition is used in the determination of Products Corporation's senior secured leverage ratio (the ratio of Products Corporation’s Senior NotesSecured Debt to EBITDA, as each such term is defined in the 2004 Credit Agreement) and Revlon, Inc. conducts an equity offeringthe consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio (the ratio of Products Corporation’s EBITDA minus Capital Expenditures to effectCash Interest Expense for such refinancing.period, as each such term is defined in the 2004 Credit Agreement).

Schedule II

REVLON CONSUMER PRODUCTS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 2003 and 20022003
(dollars in millions)

				Balance at Beginning of Year				Charged to Cost and Expenses				Other Deductions				Balance at End of Year
Year ended December 31, 2004:
Applied against asset accounts:
Allowance for doubtful accounts				$	7.7			$	(1.6	)		$	(0.5)	(1)		$	5.6
Allowance for volume and early payment discounts				$	11.7			$	47.4			$	(45.7)	(2)		$	13.4
Year ended December 31, 2003:
Applied against asset accounts:
Allowance for doubtful accounts				$	15.8			$	3.2			$	(11.3)	(1)		$	7.7
Allowance for volume and early payment discounts				$	8.2			$	40.4			$	(36.9)	(2)		$	11.7
Year ended December 31, 2002:
Applied against asset accounts:
Allowance for doubtful accounts				$	8.3			$	9.5			$	(2.0)	(1)		$	15.8
Allowance for volume and early payment discounts				$	7.1			$	31.7			$	(30.6)	(2)		$	8.2

				Balance at Beginning Year				Charged to Cost and Expenses				Other Deductions				Balance at End of Year
Year ended December 31, 2005:
Applied against asset accounts:
Allowance for doubtful accounts				$	5.6			$	0.6			$	(1.1)	(1)		$	5.1
Allowance for volume and early payment discounts				$	13.4			$	49.6			$	(49.2)	(2)		$	13.8
Year ended December 31, 2004:
Applied against asset accounts:
Allowance for doubtful accounts				$	7.7			$	(1.6	)		$	(0.5)	(1)		$	5.6
Allowance for volume and early payment discounts				$	11.7			$	47.4			$	(45.7)	(2)		$	13.4
Year ended December 31, 2003:
Applied against asset accounts:
Allowance for doubtful accounts				$	15.8			$	3.2			$	(11.3)	(1)		$	7.7
Allowance for volume and early payment discounts				$	8.2			$	40.4			$	(36.9)	(2)		$	11.7

Notes:

(1)	Doubtful accounts written off, less recoveries, reclassifications and foreign currency translation adjustments.

(2)	Discounts taken, reclassifications and foreign currency translation adjustments.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Revlon Consumer Products Corporation
(Registrant)

By:   /s/ Jack L. Stahl				By:   /s/ Thomas E. McGuire				By:   /s/ John F. Matsen, Jr.
Jack L. Stahl President, Chief Executive Officer and Director				Thomas E. McGuire Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer				John F. Matsen, Jr. Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller

Dated: March 10, 20052, 2006

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant on March 10, 20052, 2006 and in the capacities indicated.

Signature				Title
* ______________________________________________________ (Ronald O. Perelman)				Chairman of the Board and Director
* ______________________________________________________ (Barry F. Schwartz)				Director
* ______________________________________________________ (Donald G. Drapkin)				Director
/s/ Jack L. Stahl ______________________________________________________ (Jack L. Stahl)				President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
* ______________________________________________________ (Alan S. Bernikow)				Director
* ______________________________________________________ (Edward J. Landau)				Director

* Robert K. Kretzman, by signing his name hereto, does hereby sign this report on behalf of the directors of the registrant after whose typed names asterisks appear, pursuant to powers of attorney duly executed by such directors and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

*	Robert K. Kretzman, by signing his name hereto, does hereby sign this report on behalf of the directors of the registrant above whose typed names asterisks appear, pursuant to powers of attorney duly executed by such directors and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

By: /s/ Robert K. Kretzman

______________________________

Robert K. Kretzman
Attorney-in-fact

---