1

                                 UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                            Washington, D.C.  20549

                                   FORM 10-K

[X]  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
     EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                  For the fiscal year ended December 31, 19971999



                         Commission File number 1-13662

                   BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS CORPORATION
                           800 West Bryn Mawr Avenue
                             Itasca, Illinois 60143
                                (630) 773 - 5000

A Delaware Corporation                                                82-0477390


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

       Title of each class               Name of exchange on which registered
   Common Stock, $.01 par value                New York Stock Exchange

          Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
                                      None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes   X      No
                                        -----       -----

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [ ]

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the
registrant, computed by reference to the price at which the stock was sold as of
the close of business on February 27, 1998:  $221,284,302.29, 2000: $184,684,073.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of
common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
                                                      Shares Outstanding
            Class                                   as of February 27, 199829, 2000
            -----                                   -----------------------
  Common Stock, $.01 par value                            65,649,75865,814,460


                      DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

1.   The registrant's annual reportIncome Statement and Notes to Quarterly Financial
     Statements from the fourth quarter Fact Book for the fiscal yearthree months ended
     December 31, 1997, portions of which1999, are incorporated by reference into Parts I,
     II III, and IV of
     this Form 10-K, and

2.   Portions of the registrant's proxy statement relating to its 1998
     annual meeting of shareholders to be held on April 21, 1998, are
     incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K ("the Company's
     proxy statement").10-K.
   2

                   BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS CORPORATION

                               TABLE OF CONTENTS


                                     PART I
Item Page - ---- ---- 1. Business ........................................................ 3Business............................................................... 2. Properties ...................................................... 15Properties............................................................. 3. Legal Proceedings ............................................... 16Proceedings...................................................... 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders ............. 16Holders.................... PART II 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters ......................................................... 16Matters.. 6. Selected Financial Data ......................................... 17Data................................................ 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ........................................... 18Operations................................................. 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk ...... 18Risk............. 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data ..................... 18Data............................ 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure ............................................ 18Disclosure.................................................. PART III 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant .............. 19Registrant..................... 11. Executive Compensation .......................................... 21Compensation................................................. 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management ...................................................... 21Management......... 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions .................. 22Transactions......................... PART IV 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K ........................................................ 228-K.......
2 3 This Form 10-K contains "forward-looking statements" that involve uncertainties and risks. When used in this document, the words "believe," "intend," "expect," "plan," and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from the results expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. Factors which could cause or contribute to such differences include, among others: the success of developing business with new initiatives;customers and of cross- selling efforts to existing customers; the successful development and implementation of electronic commerce business strategies; the timing and amount of any price changes in paper or fuel; the pace of acquisitions and the success of integrating acquisitions; continued same-location sales growth; the success of new initiatives; the availability of financing for future acquisitions; the mix of our sales by product category and country; the integration of acquired companies; the effect of continued competitive pressure on pricing and margins; the pace of cost structure improvements; the effects of the paper cycle; the capabilities of operating and computer systems; the impact of Boise Cascade Corporation's ("BCC") offer to purchase our outstanding public shares; and the uncertainties of expansion into international markets, including currency exchange rates, legal and regulatory requirements, and other factors. PART I ITEM 1. BUSINESS OVERVIEW- ------ -------- Overview Boise Cascade Office Products Corporation ("BCOP" and together with its subsidiaries, the "Company" or "we") is one of the world's premier business-to-businessbusiness-to- business distributors of products for the office. We sell a broad line of branded and private label office supplies, office furniture, paper, computer-related items,computer supplies, and promotional products. We purchase most of our products directly from manufacturers and distribute them directly to end-userbusiness customers. Throughout our 34-year36-year history, our primary marketing focus has been and remains business customers. For much of that time, we concentrated on serving the commodity office supply needs of large businesses in the United States. More recently, we have broadened our marketing focus to include small and medium-sizedmedium- sized businesses, and home offices, expanded our array of products and services, and entered theseveral international office products distribution markets in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Our Customers. We market our products and services to large business customers, including our national account customers in the U.S., through our direct sales force, our annual full-line catalog (including a CD-ROM version), our Internet-based ordering system ("I-97"), and a variety of specialized catalogs. This is traditionally referred to as the contract stationer channel. We serve small business and home office customers through the direct marketing channel using targeted catalogs supported by sophisticated database marketing programs and regional call centers to sell our products. We market to medium-sized business customers using service elements of both channels, depending upon specific customer needs. In 1997, approximately 85% of our total sales were derived from the contract stationer channel and approximately 15% from the direct marketing channel. Geographic Expansion.markets. Until the beginning of 1996, we operated only in the U.S., where we are aone of the premier distributordistributors of office products. Since the beginning of 1996, we have expanded into Australia, Belgium (under the name JPG), Canada (under the name Grand & Toy), France (under the names JPG and Boise Cascade Office Products France), Germany (under the name Buro + Technik), Spain (under the name Sistemas Kalamazoo), and the United Kingdom (under the names Neat Ideas and Boise Cascade Office Products UK). We also operate office products 3 4 retail stores in Canada to support Grand & Toy's service to its business customers. In 1997,1999, foreign operations accounted for approximately 20%24% of our total net sales and approximately 19% of our total operating income. We expect our international operations to become increasingly important in 1998 and in future years.sales. For financial information about our foreign operations, see Note 1, "Organization and Basis of Presentation,10, "Segment Information," of the Notes to Financial Statements in our 1997 Annual Report, which is incorporated by reference.Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. Our integrated network of 4945 distribution centers in the U.S. enables us to provide consistent products, prices, and service to our national account customers. It also enables us to provide next-day delivery of virtually all orders to our large business customers and approximatelyover 75% of orders to our small and medium-sizedbusiness customers. In Canada, we have a national network of nineseven distribution centers. In Australia, we have a national network of eightseven distribution centers. In the U.K. and westernWestern Europe, we have sixfive distribution centers which willthat form the nucleus of our network in Europe. THE OFFICE PRODUCTS DISTRIBUTION INDUSTRY United States.In December 1999, BCC announced a proposal to acquire our outstanding public shares. On March 12, 2000, BCC and BCOP entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger in which BCC would purchase all of BCOP's publicly held shares for $16.50 in cash. In accordance with that Agreement, BCC commenced a tender offer for our minority public shares on March 22, 2000. The office products distribution industryoffer will expire on April 19, 2000, unless it is extended. If BCC is successful in the U.S. has consolidated rapidly and is undergoing other significant changes. The industry consists of companies that operate in one or more of three broad channels for the marketing and distribution of office products to end-users. Business customers have the opportunity to purchase office products through anyobtaining a majority of the channels. The contract stationer channel. Contract stationers typically serve large and medium-sized business customers by marketing to them through both product catalogs and sales forces, stocking products in distribution centers, and delivering orders to customersminority shares, it will purchase the next business day. Orders are received electronically, by telephone or fax, or are taken by a salesperson on the customer's premises. Contract stationers typically enter into contracts with their customers that specify prices for items the customers may order, services to be provided, and other terms. Major contract stationers purchase directly from manufacturers, rely upon wholesaler intermediaries only to a limited extent for inventory backup and increased product breadth, and offer significant volume-related discounts and a high level of service to their customers. Historically, contract stationers operated in only one or a very few major metropolitan areas. We have been a significant exception for many years. In recent years, principally as a result of consolidation by acquisition, several other major contract stationers have emerged, each of which operates in a number of major metropolitan areas and, in some cases, nationally. The direct marketing channel. Direct marketers of office products typically target small and medium-sized business customers and home offices. While their procurement and order fulfillment functions are similar to contract stationers, direct marketers rely exclusively on catalogs and other database marketing programs, rather than direct sales forces, to sell their product offerings. Their marketing is based upon large, proprietary customer databases and sophisticated circulation strategies designed to increase sales from catalog mailings to customers and prospects. In addition to a few large direct marketing companies which primarily distribute office products, several of the major contract stationers and office products retailers now employ direct marketing techniques to expand their customer bases. We first entered this channel with our 1994 acquisition of the direct marketing operations of The Reliable Corporation ("Reliable"), which at that time was the third largest direct marketing distributor of office products in the United States. Since 1995, we have expanded our presence in this channelremaining shares through a start-up in Canada, 4 5 by acquiring direct marketing businesses in France, Spain,short-form merger. If BCC completes the United Kingdomtender and the U.S., and by entering intomerger, we will again become a joint venture in Germany. The retail channel. Office products retailers typically serve small and medium-sized businesses, home offices, and individuals. For many years, the retail channel consisted principallywholly- owned subsidiary of a large number of independent dealers, operating only one or a few relatively small stores in a single local area and purchasing a limited inventory of office supplies from wholesalers for resale at or near manufacturers' list prices. Over the last decade, the retail channel has changed dramatically, primarily because of the emergence and rapid growth of office products superstores. The superstore concept typically involves a large suburban strip mall or stand-alone store which employs a warehouse format, is open for business seven days a week, stocks a large number and broad range of items in inventory, purchases in volume, takes delivery at the store directly from manufacturers, and offers many products at discounts from manufacturers' list prices. Every major metropolitan area in the U.S. is now served by at least one, and most are served by several, office products superstores. Our participation in this channel is extremely limited, constituting less than 3% of our sales in 1997. The changes described above have blurred the lines between these three marketing and distribution channels and between the companies operating in these channels. Several major industry participants operate across these channels and/or serve all or a large part of the office products customer spectrum. Significant changes are also taking place in the way business customers purchase office products. More and more large multi-site businesses, recognizing the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of uniform system-wide purchasing of their office products, are entering into national contracts with single distributors. We believe this move by customers to reduce suppliers and consolidate purchasing power is gaining momentum. In addition, some major businesses are beginning to use integrated procurement systems as they seek to satisfy not only their office products needs but also their requirements for a variety of other office-related services and supplies from a single source. Small and medium-size businesses are also focusing on ways to increase efficiency and reduce costs in meeting their requirements for office products, which has resulted in the development of sophisticated direct marketing techniques tailored to their needs. International. The office products markets in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom are similar to the U.S. market. Some industry consolidation has occurred, to varying extents, in each country, and the channels have blurred. BUSINESS STRATEGYBCC. Business Strategy We have grown rapidly due to both acquisitions and same-location sales increases since 1993, when we sold the wholesale component of our business.increases. For the last three years, our year-over-year increases in net sales, sales on a same-location basis, and operating income have been as follows: Year-Over-Year Growth ---------------------
Year Net Sales Same-Location Sales Operating Income ---- --------- ------------------- ---------------- 1997 31%1999 10% 8% 14% (1) 1998 18% 1996 51%11% 10% (1) 1997 31% 14% 46% 1995 45% 26% 65%18%
5 6(1) Before the impact of our European restructuring and joint venture dissolution. See "Other operating (income) expense" in Footnote 1, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies," of the Notes to Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. We believe that the distribution of office products to the office customerbusiness customers continues to present growth opportunities. We intend to continue exploring such opportunities through ourOur business strategy whichfor exploiting these opportunities includes the following elements: EXPAND OUR GEOGRAPHIC SCOPEIncrease Sales of Core Products and Add New Products and Services We nowplan to increase sales of core products, such as computer supplies, promotional products, office furniture, and office paper. Growth potential also exists in developing procurement management offerings for our customers, including components of integrated supply and expansion of our electronic commerce capabilities. By broadening our products and services, we are better able to meet the needs of those customers interested in reducing their supplier base and taking advantage of "one-stop shopping." This also leverages our distribution and systems infrastructure. In response to our customers' needs for computer supplies, we market computer-related products from 31 of our U.S. distribution centers under the name Boise Technology. Our sales of computer supplies represented approximately 16 percent of our net sales in 1999. In our U.S. promotional products business, Boise Marketing Services, Inc. ("BMSI"), we repositioned our efforts to focus on large program customers. Our sales of promotional products represented approximately three percent of our net sales in 1999. Our growth strategy also targets increasing office furniture sales across the system. Our office furniture sales in 1999 represented approximately 12 percent of our net sales. Office paper is also an important part of our strategy. Our sales of office paper represented approximately 15 percent of our net sales in 1999. For several years, we have businesses in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Spain,offered customers the ability to place orders with us via the Internet. We are continuing to improve and the United Kingdom, as well as the United States. We intend to enter the office products distribution business in other foreign countries where practical and profitable, as well as to expand our operationsInternet ordering platform. As more customers choose to conduct business electronically, we believe our infrastructure and electronic commerce capabilities give us an advantage in those countries where we currently operate. We expect to do this through a combination of acquisitions, joint ventures, alliances, and start-ups. BROADEN OUR CUSTOMER BASE -area. Broaden Our Customer Base . We plan to increase our national account business. We define a "national account" as a multi-site customer served by two or more of our distribution centers under a single contract. Large businesses with many office sites across the U.S. are increasingly seeking to reduce product and process costs by purchasing all of their office products needs from a single company with national distribution capability under one centrally-negotiatedcentrally- negotiated national contract. We believe that we currently have a competitive advantage with respect to such businesses inbusinesses. In the U.S. because, our network of the nationwide coverage of our integrated distribution centers. This coveragecenters enables us to provide consistent delivery of products, prices, and service across all customer locations. A key element of our strategy is to use this advantage to expand our business with national account customers. We have a specialized national account marketing staff which is dedicated to building and maintaining our business with national accounts. The amount of ourOur sales to such customers hashave grown significantly, as the following table indicates:
U.S. National Account Sales --------------------------- Amount % of Total Year (in millions) Net Sales ---- ------------- ---------- 1997 $819 32% 1996 $555 28% 1995 $406 31%
significantly. We are pursuing a similar national account strategy in our foreign operations, which may serve multi-national accounts as well. -. We plan to increase our business with small and medium-sizedmiddle-size customers. These are businesses and home offices. The office products distribution market for small and medium-sized businesses and home officeswith 25 to 100 employees. Our Boise-Express initiative is growing more rapidly than the large business customer segment. A directa custom-designed sales force usually cannot serve these smaller customers cost-effectively.effort aimed specifically at middle-size customers. We believe that the direct marketing channelBoise-Express initiative provides the most convenient and cost-effective way for middle-size customers in this market 6 7 segment to purchase office products. An important element in our growth strategy is to expand our business with this segment of the market,middle-size customers, in both geographic coverage and product offerings. To accelerate this opportunity, we opened a new outbound telesales center in Norman, Oklahoma, during the first quarter of 2000. . We plan to increase our business with small business customers. Starting with our April 1994 acquisition of the office products distribution business of Reliable, we have expanded our direct marketing business,capabilities, both in the U.S. and abroad. In December 1995, we acquired Neat Ideas, the United Kingdom's second largest office products direct marketer. In December 1996, we purchased Quill Corporation's Canadian customer list and began direct marketing in Canada through Grand & Toy. With the formation of our joint venture with Otto Versand in January 1997, we began direct marketing operations in Germany. In July 1997, we purchased Jean-Paul Guisset S.A. ("JPG"), France's third largest office products direct marketer, in which Otto Versand holds a minority interest.marketer. In January 1998, we expanded our product offering when we purchased the business of Fidelity Products Inc., a direct marketer of graphic arts supplies and warehouse and shipping supplies. As the following table indicates, our worldwideAlso in 1998, we acquired Sistemas Kalamazoo, a direct marketer of office products in Spain. We also began direct marketing office products in Belgium in 1998. Our sales to small business has grown significantly duringcustomers represented approximately 16 percent of our net sales in 1999. Expand Our Geographic Scope We have businesses in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Spain, and the last three years:
Direct Marketing Channel Sales --------------------------- Number of Amount % of Total Active Customers (1) Year (in millions) Net Sales (at December 31) ---- ------------- ------------ -------------------- 1997 $379 15% 971,000 1996 $277 14% 573,000 1995 $201 15% 382,000
____________ (1) An "active customer" is one which has made at least one purchase during the preceding 12 months INCREASE SALES OF CORE PRODUCTS AND ADD NEW PRODUCTS AND SERVICES We plan to increase sales of certain existing product categories, such as office papers and office furniture,United Kingdom, as well as the sales of our newest product categories, such as computer-related items and promotional products. As part of this element of our growth strategy, we offer customized procurement and product-related support services to our customers, particularly in electronic commerce. By broadening our product lines and services, we are better able to meet the needs of those customers interested in reducing their supplier base and taking advantage of "one-stop shopping." This also leverages our distribution and systems infrastructure. As a result of our efforts to broaden the product mix purchased by current customers, our sales of office papers, measured by volume, increased year-over-year by more than 37% in 1997 and more than 40% in 1996. Our growth strategy also targets office furniture, with the goal of increasing its sales across the system. To do this, we are using furniture sales specialists, showrooms, and targeted catalogs. U.S. contract furniture sales in 1997 increased 53% over 1996 levels. In response to rapid increases in our customers' needs for computer supplies, hardware, software, and peripherals, in September 1995, we acquired Word Technology Systems, Inc. ("WTS"), a distributor of computer-related products to businesses throughout the United States. In 1996, we 7 8 formed an alliance with XL Connect Solutions, Inc., a technology-related service company, which enables usWe intend to provide our customers a wide range of services that complement our computer-related product offering. This past year we have continuedenter the office products distribution business in other countries where practical and profitable, as well as to expand our computer consumables business by acquiring two businesses: TDI, basedoperations in Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina, and Carlyle Computer Products Ltd., a Canadian company.those countries where we currently operate. We now market computer-related products under the name Boise Technology from 20 of our U.S. distribution centers. Eventually, we expect to increase the numberdo this through a combination of U.S. distribution centers that carry the Boise Technology offering to 36. Many of our customers use promotional products, such as jackets, T-shirts, coffee mugs,acquisitions, joint ventures, alliances, start-ups, and pen and pencil sets with corporate logos or unique designs, for employee recognition and incentive programs and for marketing and advertising. To bolster the range of products and related services that we offer in this large and growing category, we acquired Oregon Wholesale Novelty Company, Inc. ("OWNCO") in November 1996. In May 1997, we acquired OstermanAPI, Inc., an Ohio-based company. At that time, we formed Boise Marketing Services, Inc. ("BMSI"), a subsidiary of which we own 88%. Both OWNCO and OstermanAPI are now part of this subsidiary, and we are in the process of integrating those companies to provide an expanded range of quality promotional products and services. In January 1998, we entered into a co-marketing agreement with Wallace Computer Services, Inc., a custom printer and forms distributor, to create the alliance, Boise-Wallace Single SourceSM. This alliance will allow us to offer our U.S. customers single-contact access to an integrated supply system for office consumables, while ultimately reducing customer cost. Wallace is a recognized leader in forms and consumable supplies management services, as well as one of the largest manufacturers and distributors of information management products in the United States. We expect that this alliance will be the first of several such arrangements created to serve our customers' needs. Each of the foregoing elements of oursame-location growth. Our growth strategy has both an acquisition component and an internal growth component,component; the mix of which, for any given element in any given year, will be different year to year because of that year's priorities,business opportunities, capital availability, and other factors.priorities. Acquisitions have been, and we expect them to continue to be, an important means by which we executeelement of our strategy. Our acquisitionAcquisition decisions will be driven by our desire to provide quality service to our customers and by the availability of opportunities which suit our requirements, including profitability and ability to enhance our geographic coverage or other elements of customer service.requirements. The near-term focus of our acquisition program is to increase our presence abroad in the contract stationer channel andas well as to broadenexpand our product offerings in the United States. We also expect our direct marketing presence in Europe to grow through both acquisitions and internal growth initiatives. We may acquire additional contract stationers in the United States. We typically seek to retain management of each acquired business and to draw upon its specialized knowledge. In addition, we intend to integrate acquired businesses into our nationwide distribution networknetworks to the extent it is appropriate and cost-effective. In the U.S., we have opened new distribution centers in selected metropolitan areas where we wished to establish or expand our presence but where we could not find an appropriate acquisition candidate. While a start-up typically requires a smaller initial capital investment than an acquisition, it may take two to four years to achieve profitability. We have transferred a base of business from existing distribution centers to 8 9 our recent start-ups in order to speed this process. Also, withinIn the next few years, we expect to relocate severalcertain existing distribution centers into new and larger facilities.facilities to support our growth. An aggressive acquisition and expansion program such as ours is not without risk. Competition, availability of suitable candidates, or capital availability all may affect our ability to complete targeted acquisitions. In addition, we encounter various risks associated with each acquisition which we do complete, including the possible inability to integrate the acquired business into our distribution network, increased goodwill amortization, diversion of management's attention, and unanticipated problems, costs, or liabilities, some or all of which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial performance. With our expansion through acquisition into foreign markets, theThe management and integration risks associated with ourof foreign acquisitions will beare greater. Additional risks arising out of our operations in foreign countries include those associated with currency exchange rates, new and different legal and regulatory requirements, and language and cultural differences. BUSINESS MODELBusiness Model United States. Our objective is to be the preferred supplier of office products to business customers of all sizes by outperforming our competitors at all levels - to "out-national" our national competitors and "out-local" our local competitors. To achieve this, ourOur business model is designed to take maximum advantage of both our centralized national capabilities and our local presence in major markets across the country. We manage centrally where it is efficient and cost effective to do so or where there is value to our customers in nationwide consistency, and we manage locally where it meets local market needs and opportunities or local customer requirements. The majorityDuring 1998, we completed the implementation of a new order-entry computer system in our integrated U.S. distribution centers are linked through a common computer system with our headquarters and with our other distribution centers. This integrated distribution network enables us toWe can provide consistent next-day delivery of virtually the entire range ofall products offered in our full-linefull- line catalog, at agreed-upon prices and service levels, to all of our large business customers and approximatelycustomers. Over 75% of orders to our small and medium-sized business customers throughoutcan be delivered the country. It alsonext day. Our integrated system facilitates the delivery of consistent products, pricing, service, and reporting to our many national account customers. In addition, it enables us to centralizereduce operating costs by centralizing certain administrative, logistical, and other management functions, thereby reducing operating costs.functions. For example, we are able to centrally monitor inventory levels and forecast future demand for items stocked at our distribution centers. As a result, the responsibility for rebuying our most frequently ordered items is a centralized function. This has reduced our inventory restocking costs and improved our annual inventory turn rate. Since the product overlap between our contract stationer and direct marketing businesses is high, centralized rebuying for both channels has resulted in economies of scale.rates. We plan to continue converting recently and newly acquired distribution centers to this common system. Our merchandising activities are centralized, including product selection; catalog preparation; and vendor selection, management, and evaluation. Sales training, marketing programs, activity-based cost management programs, accounting, logistics, and human resources management are other functions that are primarily or totally managed centrally and can benefit from economies of scale as we grow. Providing responsive and cost-effective customer service is another importanta critical element of our business model, requiringmodel. We must maintain an appropriate balance between centralization and local autonomy. We provide customer service at each distribution center to handle location-specific matters, and we operate centralized call centers which enter customer orders and respond to customer inquiries about product alternatives, order 9 10 status, billing, and other matters. We have centralized call centers at Peru and Ottawa, Illinois, and Bristol, Virginia, to handle inbound orders and inquiries forautonomy in serving our contract stationer and direct marketing customers. Our integrated computer system enables us to organize certain customer support functions in a centralized, cost-effective manner without compromising customer focus. We provide customer service at each distribution center to handle location-specific matters, and operate centralized call centers which enter customer orders and respond to customer inquiries about product alternatives, order status, billing, and other matters. We have centralized call centers at Peru and Ottawa, Illinois; Bristol, Virginia; and Casper, Wyoming; to handle inbound orders and inquiries for our customers. During the first quarter of 2000, we opened a new outbound telesales center in Norman, Oklahoma. A substantial part of our internal capital spending is directed toward making our operations more efficient and cost effective.dedicated to improving operating efficiency. In addition to seeking to improve the efficiency of our individual distribution centers, our logistics experts focus on the efficiency of our distribution network as a whole in each of the countries where we operate. Stocking strategies, distribution center configurations, and delivery methods are all being designed to serve customers better while minimizing our investment and controlling our operating costs. In the U.S., we continue to consolidate theour order fulfillment operations of our direct marketing business with those of our contract stationer business.operations. We have an intercompany agreement under which BCOP fills orders for Reliable's customers from eight of BCOP's distribution centers. Eventually, we expect to use approximately 15nine of BCOP's distribution centers to fill orders for Reliable's direct marketing customers in the United States.Reliable. Our steps to date have increased the next-day delivery coverage of Reliable's direct marketing operations and have reduced our overall occupancy and delivery costs (as a percentage of net sales). We believe that a local distribution center presence is important to many of our customers and can provide a competitive advantage within a specific metropolitan area. While national accounts are coordinated centrally, our sales force is distributed across our national network and supervised locally. Each distribution center is a profit center. Its general manager is responsible for local account targeting, pricing, and servicing; distribution center productivity; sales management; and location-specific or customer-specific products and services, alliances, and promotions. In each local market, our business model draws on the local market knowledge of our management team and sales representatives to develop and offer customized services-fromservices, from stocking customer-unique products to special reporting and delivery services.services, to meet the needs of their customers. Our business model is data intensive. Through our activity-based cost management system ("ABCM"), we measure our costs by activity, and then by customer and by product. ABCM facilitates cost comparisons across all distribution centers so that "best practices" can be identified at one location and replicated at all locations where appropriate. The ABCM system enables us to directly attribute over 90% of our actual costs to specific customer-related activities. We also measure on an ongoing basis on-time delivery, order accuracy and completeness, supplier performance by location, customer satisfaction, associate satisfaction, and key process stability and capability. We believe that these measurement systems, including ABCM, provide us with a competitive advantage. International. In each of the foreign countries where we have an extensive system of distribution centers, currently Australia and Canada,operations, we plan to applyare applying the major elements of our domestic business model: to take maximum advantage of our centralized national capabilities and our local presence, to link each of the facilities via computer, to offer similar products across the entire system, to serve the full range of customers from each facility, and to centralize a variety of functions where it is efficient and cost effective to do so, while performing certain other functions locally. As part of our movement toward these goals in Canada, we have begun construction on a new and more efficient distribution facility for Toronto, Ontario. 10 11 PRODUCTSProducts Our net sales by product category, through all distribution channels, expressed as a percentage of our total net sales, during each of the last three years were as follows:
Year Ended December 31 ------------------------------------------------- 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 ---- ---- ----------- ------- ------- Office Supplies (2) 77% 84% 80%(1) 54% 61% 66% Office Paper 15% 13% 13% Office Furniture (3) 13% 8% 9% Other(2) 12% 12% 11% Computer Supplies 16% 10% 7% Promotional Products (4) 10% 8% 11%3% 4% 3% ---- ---- ---- 100% 100% 100% ==== ==== ====
_______________________ (2)(1) Includes, among many other products, pens, staples,staplers, file folders, binders, office papers, envelopes, tablets,and calculators and computer-related products (3)(2) Includes desks, chairs, file cabinets, computer stations, and furniture accessories (4) Includes lunchroom supplies, janitorial supplies,Sales and special items, including promotional products SALES AND MARKETINGMarketing Electronic Commerce. As part of our overall program of providing expanded opportunities for electronic data interchange with our large business customers, we developed and offer an Internet-based ordering system. This system allows customers to order our complete range of products "on-line." It provides customers with customized levels of security and authorizations to ensure that each order has the proper approval. Features include multi-tiered approvals, user-customized security, credit card capabilities, a variety of viewing options, and true electronic data interchange ("EDI") capabilities. To use it, customers only need access to the Internet and browser software. We also developed and offer a CD-ROM version of our annual full-line catalog. Interactive features of the CD-ROM catalog provide customers, by computer, the same information on each item as the printed version of the catalog provides. The features also permit a customer to view complementary items, see prices specific to that customer, and order electronically. We also developed and offer I-97, an Internet-based ordering system that allows customers to order our compete range of products "on-line." I-97 provides customers with customized levels of security and authorizations to ensure that each order has the proper approval. Features of I-97 include multi-tiered approvals, user-customized security, credit card capabilities, a variety of viewing options, and true electronic data interchange ("EDI") capabilities. To use I-97, customers only need access to the Internet and browser software. EDI between our mainframe computer and our large business customers' systems, local-area-network-based electronic commerce systems, and the systems mentioned above accounted for approximately 18%20% of our domestic inbound order volume in 1997. OPERATIONS1999. Operations Logistics and systems support. Advanced information technology is critical in a nationwide distribution business involving thousands of different itemsproducts being delivered under tight time constraints. We were a pioneer in our industry in the use of computer systems to facilitate this process. We have developed and use customized software applications to carry out or assist in performing a great variety of business functions, including, among other things: order entry; order processing; receiving, storing, and "picking" inventory; routing delivery vehicles; measuring productivity and transaction quality; generating customized reports; preparing accounting statements; and tracking product and customer data. To provide additional system flexibility and capacity, functions. During 1998, we are converting partcompleted the implementation of our principal computer network in the U.S. from a mainframe to a distributed system. The system employs a new software 11 12 applications package developed by and licensed from an outside contractor which specializesorder- entry computer system in our integrated U.S. distribution companies. The software is a combination of pre-existing modules and custom applications developed specifically for us and tailored to our needs.centers. Order entry. We offer a wide range of order entry options to our large business customers. Customers wishing to place an order with us in the U.S. may (1) give the order in person to a sales associate; (2) convey the order by telephone or facsimile transmission either to a customer service representative at a local distribution center or, using a toll-free number, to a representative at a central customer service facility; or (3) enter the order by using a personal computer or other computer interface, including on-line ordering using I-97. Ease in ordering is also a key component of customer service in our direct marketing operations. To facilitateordering; (2) convey the order placement and entry, we maintain a 24-hour, seven-day-a-week, toll-free number for ordering by telephone or fax. These lines are linkedfax to our central order reception anda customer service centers in Illinois, whererepresentative at a local distribution center or toll-free to a customer service associates receive orders and enter them intofacility; or (3) give the order in person to a computerized order processing system. A credit check is performed electronically and, if credit is approved, each order is transmitted to the appropriate distribution center based on a pre-programmed ordering system which uses customer zip codes and other factors to assure rapid fulfillment and delivery.sales associate. Stocking, order fulfillment, and delivery. Our distribution centers receive and store inventory and fill customer orders. MostMany of our distribution centers regularly stock all of the core items offered in our full-line catalog. Our stocking strategy at each distribution center is designed to ensure our ability to provide delivery of all catalog items at the lowest cost on a next-day basis to large business customers and on a next- or second-day basis to our other customers. Our stocking strategy reflects a rigorously analyzed economic tradeoff between carrying a particular item in inventory at a particular distribution center or sourcing it from aone of our nearby distribution centercenters or a wholesaler. Orders received during the day are picked, packed, and assembled using a variety of automated equipment. This is performed at the appropriate distribution center for delivery the following day to customers within the next-day service area for that center. Depending on population density and other logistical factors, the next-day service area of a given distribution center can cover up to a 400-mile radius from the distribution center. Based on an optimized route structure allowing us to schedule specific vehicles and delivery times, our software can determine the optimal sequence in which orders are to be loaded into delivery vehicles. The vehicles may be eitherare owned or leased by us or operated by common or contract carriers, depending on the cost effectiveness of each alternative. In 1998, we began converting a portion of our dedicated delivery routes in the U.S. to our private delivery fleet. This delivery strategy allows us to gain better efficiency on our routes and provides our customers with better service. Procurement. Our computer system monitors inventory levels and forecasts demand for each item which we stock and recommends the timing and amount of future purchases. We have centralized the rebuying function for those items most frequently ordered by our customers, which we believe contributes to more efficient purchasing decisions and lower procurement costs. To assist in making vendor selection decisions and in reducingreduce inventory cost, we have developed and use a detailed vendor management and evaluation program. This program enables our central purchasing staff to measure and evaluate the performance of each of our vendors in a number of areas and then evaluate them based upon these measurements. 12 13key areas. Foreign operations. In each of the foreign countries where we have an extensive system of distribution centers, currently Australia and Canada, our operations are structured similarly to our domestic operations. Within those countries, most distribution facilities are integrated on the same computer systems.system. This allows us to take advantage of efficiencies and centralize many common administrative processes. It also positions these foreign operations to serve large corporate customers on a coordinated national basis. EMPLOYEESIn the U.K., we have restructured our warehouse and delivery network and have installed a new order-management system with cross-border capabilities. In France, our contract stationer subsidiary is benefiting from improved warehousing processes. These operations, along with our strong JPG subsidiary in France, will provide a foundation for a successful Pan-European business. Employees At December 31, 1997,1999, we had a worldwide total of approximately 11,000 full-12,200 full-time and part-time employees ("associates"). worldwide. Of these, approximately 4,0004,700 were employed primarily in marketing and sales, order processing, and customer service; approximately 3,6003,800 were located at our distribution centers in inventory receipt and storage, order filling, and as drivers of delivery vehicles;vehicle drivers; and approximately 3,4003,700 were employed in other operations, management, and administration. Part-time employees supplement our associates in customer service and order filling during those periods each day when there are surges in incoming calls or outgoing orders. COMPETITIONCompetition We face a highly competitive environment in each of the office products distribution channels in which we operate.environment. Competition is based principally on price, service, and customer relationships. We are one of the premier distributors of office products throughfor the contract stationer and direct marketing channelsoffice with operations in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Spain, the United Kingdom and the United States. United States. InDuring the contract stationer channel, the consolidation of the industry intolast several years, a relatively small number of major, publicly held participants each seekinghave acquired other participants in order to establish a national distribution networknetworks similar to our own, is largely complete.own. A number of these major participants including some of the superstores, have grown at rapid rates, principally through the acquisition of local or regional contract stationers.rates. During 1999, two large office products companies merged. Some of our competitors have greater financial resources and potential purchasing powerleverage than we do. The contract stationer operationsand direct marketing efforts of the office products superstores also benefit from their national advertising and franchising programs. We also compete with the smallernumerous local and regional contract stationers, many of which have long-standing customer relationships. Our superiorWe believe our ability to date, to link together our network of domestic distribution centers including those which we have recently acquired, into an integrated national system enablesmakes us distinctly competent in our ability to deliver consistent products, prices, and service across all locations of multi-site customers. We believe that this gives us a competitive advantage with multi-site customers. In the direct marketing channel, we compete for the small and medium-sized business customers and the home office customer primarily against two larger direct marketers of office products as well as the office products superstores and small retail dealers. We believe the synergies between our direct marketing business and our contract stationer business give us a competitive advantage, in terms of service and cost, over the other direct marketing companies. We also believe that we have a competitive advantage over the superstores and small retail dealers in that our customers are able to avoid the time and cost associated with store visits and transporting merchandise from the store to their offices. As part of the significant blurring of the lines between distribution channels which has occurred in recent years, several of the major contract stationers and office products superstores now employ direct marketing techniques to expand their customer bases. 13 14 As indicated earlier, some large companies are starting to use integrated procurement systems and Internet-based systems to purchase office products and office-related services and supplies. Other companies that provide office-related services and supplies, including document management, printing services, industrial supplies, information technology and computer supplies, and companies that provide Internet ordering functionality are providing some competition today and will likely provide increased competition in the future. We have developed systems for multi-vendor, integrated procurement. In addition, we continue to enhance electronic ordering functionality for our customers and actively encourage our customers to expand their use of electronic ordering with us. International. In our operations in Australia, Belgium, Canada, we are one ofFrance, Spain, and the largest contract stationers and we have a strong position in retail. Through its long operating history in Canada, Grand & Toy has developed excellent name recognition. In the contract stationer channel in Canada,United Kingdom, we compete with several major companies who have made acquisitions in Canada similar to the consolidation process in the U.S., in addition to numerousmany local competitors. Two of the U.S.-based superstores have retail operations in Canada. We are the only sizable direct marketer of office products in Canada. In Australia, we competedistributors and with two of the largeseveral U.S.-based office products distribution companies in the contract stationer channel and with many local distributors. We do not currently have direct marketing operations in Australia. In the United Kingdom, we currently do business in both the direct marketing and contract stationer channels.companies. We compete with a larger direct marketing company, with companies inthrough the retail channel, and with other contract stationers. In Germany, our current presence consistsstrength of our 50% interest in the joint venture with Otto Versand to direct market office products. In France, our acquisitions this year of JPGintegrated systems, customer service, and Society Europa marked our entry into the direct marketing and contract stationer channels in that country. We compete with a larger direct marketing company, with companies in the retail channel, and with other contract stationers. In Spain, we acquired Sistemas Kalamazoo, a direct marketer of office products in February 1998. We compete with companies in the retail channel and other direct marketers. ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS We are subject to federal and state and local laws, regulations, and ordinances that govern activities which might have adverse environmental effects, such as discharges to air and water, as well as the handling and storage of hazardous wastes. None of our facilities typically engage in activities or generate discharges of the types generally governed by these laws and regulations. We believe we are in substantial compliance with all such applicable laws and regulations. We are also subject to federal laws and regulations which impose liability for the costs of cleaning up, and certain damages resulting from, sites of past spills, disposals, or other forms of environmental damage, including those which might have occurred prior to our ownership at particular sites. We are currently not aware of any environmental conditions at any of the sites that we operate which, individually or in the aggregate, would be likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that any such environmental conditions in the future will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. 14competitive pricing. 15 ITEM 2. PROPERTIES - ------ ---------- Our corporate headquarters together withand our Chicago metropolitan area distribution center isare located in a combined facility that we own at 800 W. Bryn Mawr Avenue in Itasca, Illinois, a suburb northwest of Chicago (1). As of February 27, 1998,29, 2000, we operated 7264 distribution centers, including the suburban Chicago distribution center, at the following locations:
AUSTRALIA CANADA (4) --------- ------ Adelaide, South Australia Calgary, Alberta Brisbane, Queensland Moncton, New Brunswick Canberra, Australian Capital Territory Montreal, Quebec Kalgoorlie, Western Australia Ottawa, Ontario Melbourne, Victoria (2) Toronto, Ontario (2) Perth, Western Australia (Don Mills and Bermondsey) Sydney, New South Wales Vancouver, British Columbia Winnipeg, Manitoba (2) FRANCE GERMANY ------ ------- Paris (2) Karlsruhe SPAIN UNITED KINGDOM ----- -------------- Madrid (Vizcaya) Chorley, England (5) Doncaster, England (6)AUSTRALIA CANADA (4) ---------- ------ Adelaide, South Australia Calgary, Alberta Brisbane, Queensland Moncton, New Brunswick Canberra, Australian Capital Montreal, Quebec Territory Ottawa, Ontario Kalgoorlie, Western Australia Toronto, Ontario Melbourne, Victoria Vancouver, British Columbia Perth, Western Australia Winnipeg, Manitoba Sydney, New South Wales FRANCE UNITED KINGDOM ------ -------------- Paris (2) Chorley, England Doncaster, England (5) SPAIN ----- Madrid (Bilbao) UNITED STATES ------------- Albuquerque, New Mexico Milwaukee (New Berlin), Wisconsin Atlanta (Smyrna), Georgia Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota (2) Boise, Idaho (Golden Valley and New Hope) Boston (Billerica), Massachusetts Nashville, Tennessee Burlington, Vermont New Castle, Delaware Butte, Montana New York (Carlstadt, New Jersey), Charlotte, North Carolina New York Chicago (Itasca), Illinois Norfolk (Chesapeake), Virginia Cleveland (Independence), Ohio Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Columbus, Ohio Orlando, Florida Dallas (Garland), Texas Philadelphia (Bristol), Pennsylvania Denver, Colorado Phoenix, Arizona Detroit (Warren), Michigan Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Grand Rapids, Michigan Portland, Maine Hartford (Naugatuck), Connecticut Portland, Oregon (2) Honolulu, Hawaii (3) Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina Houston, Texas Reno, Nevada Jacksonville, Florida Rochester, New York Kalamazoo, Michigan St. Louis, Missouri Kansas City, Missouri Salt Lake City, Utah Las Vegas, Nevada San Francisco (Menlo Park), Los Angeles (Garden Grove), California California Louisville, Kentucky Seattle (Kent), Washington (2) Maumee, Ohio Washington (Elkridge, Maryland), DC Miami, Florida
15Atlanta (Smyrna), Georgia Milwaukee (New Berlin), Wisconsin Boise, Idaho Minneapolis (Golden Valley), Minnesota Boston (Billerica), Massachusetts Nashville, Tennessee Burlington, Vermont New Castle, Delaware Charlotte, North Carolina New York (Carlstadt, New Jersey), Chicago (Itasca), Illinois New York Cleveland (Independence), Ohio Norfolk (Chesapeake), Virginia Columbus, Ohio Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Dallas (Garland), Texas Orlando, Florida Denver, Colorado Philadelphia (Bristol), Pennsylvania Detroit (Warren), Michigan Phoenix, Arizona Hartford (Naugatuck), Connecticut Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Honolulu, Hawaii (3) Portland, Maine Houston, Texas Portland, Oregon (2) Indianapolis, Indiana Reno, Nevada Kansas City, Missouri Rochester, New York Las Vegas, Nevada St. Louis, Missouri Los Angeles (Garden Grove), Salt Lake City, Utah California San Francisco (Menlo Park), Louisville, Kentucky California Maumee, Ohio Seattle (Kent), Washington (2) Memphis (Southaven, Mississippi), Washington (Elkridge, Maryland), DC Tennessee 16 (1) Some headquarters departments are located in leased office space in Schaumburg, Illinois. (2) Consists of two facilities. (3) Consists of three owned facilities located on the islands of Oahu, Maui, and Hawaii and two leased facilities on the islands of Oahu and Kauai. We also lease and operate fourthree retail stores on the island of Oahu. (4) With the acquisition of Grand & Toy, weWe also operate approximately 70 retail stores throughout Canada. (5) Consists of eight facilities located throughout northern England. (6) Land subject to a long leasehold, with a lease term in excess of 50 years. The majority of our distribution centers are leased with lease terms expiring between 19982000 and 2006. We own facilities in Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minneapolis,Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Washington and in Australia, Canada, France, Spain, and the United Kingdom. In addition to the distribution centers listed above, we lease office space in Ottawa, Illinois, and own facilities in Peru, Illinois,Illinois; Bristol, Virginia; and Bristol, Virginia,Casper, Wyoming; where we operate central telephone calling centers for incoming orders and customer service. We also own a facility in Norman, Oklahoma, where we operate an outbound telesales center. We also lease several sales offices throughout the United States. We own substantially all equipment used in our facilities. ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS - ------ ----------------- In December 1999, nine lawsuits were filed against the company, our directors, and Boise Cascade Corporation arising out of BCC's proposal to acquire our outstanding minority public shares. All nine cases were filed in New Castle County, Delaware. The Company is not currentlylawsuits allege, among other things, that BCC's proposal was wrongful, unfair, and harmful to our public stockholders. On January 19, 2000, the court, upon stipulation of the parties, signed a consolidation order that combined the nine cases into one matter. We believe there are valid factual and legal defenses to these lawsuits and will vigorously defend all claims alleged by the plaintiffs. We are also involved in other litigation and administrative proceedings arising in the normal course of our business. In the opinion of management, our recovery, if any, legalor our liability, if any, under any pending litigation or administrative proceedings, including that it believes could have, either individually ordescribed in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on its businesspreceding paragraph, would not materially affect our financial condition or financial condition.operations. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS - ------ --------------------------------------------------- No matters were submitted to a vote of shareholders during the fourth quarter of 1997.1999. PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER - ------ ------------------------------------------------------------- MATTERS ------- Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange. The high and low sales prices for our common stock are presented in Note 11, "Quarterly Results of Operations (unaudited)," of the Notes to Financial Statements in our 1997 Annual Report and are incorporated herein by reference.Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. At February 27, 1998,29, 2000, the approximate number of holders of common shares was 7,000. 16 176,400. We intend to retain our earnings to finance our growth and for general corporate purposes and, therefore, do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA - ------ ----------------------- The following table sets forth selected historical financial data for the Company for each of the five years 19971999 through 1993.1995. The selected historical income statement data and balance sheet data as of December 31, 1999, 1998, 1997, 1996, 1995, 1994, and 1993,1995, have been derived from our audited financial statements. The data set forth below should be read in conjunction with, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to, the disclosures in Items 7 and 8 of this Form 10-K.
Year Ended December 31 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1999 (1) 1998 (2) 1997 (1)(3) 1996 (2)(4) 1995 (3) 1994 (4) 1993 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------(5) ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- (in thousands, except share and operating data) INCOME STATEMENT DATAIncome Statement Data Net Sales $3,381,725 $3,067,327 $2,596,732 $1,985,564 $1,315,953 $908,520 $682,819 Income from operations 153,443 120,494 119,250 101,300 69,467 42,199 28,777 Net income $74,857 53,067 56,886 $ 55,349 $ 43,179 $ 26,465 $ 18,046 Basic and diluted earnings per share (proforma 1995, 1994, 1993) (5)(pro forma 1995) (6): $ .89 $ .88 $ .70 $ .43 $ .29
BALANCE SHEET DATA$1.14 $.81 $.89 $.88 $.70 Balance Sheet Data December 31 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Working capital $ 227,069 $ 230,016 $ 231,357 $ 168,641 $ 145,824 $104,835 $ 77,475 Total assets 1,536,317 1,461,745 1,291,488 905,362 544,124 352,369 227,959 Total long-term obligations 360,133 420,250 384,790 170,030 14,358 5,511 3,892 Shareholders' equity 633,106 562,914 505,635 404,785 339,417 233,432 149,819
(1) During 1999, we revised the amount of the restructuring reserve that we established in the fourth quarter of 1998 for our U.K. operations. As a result, we recorded an increase to operating income of approximately $4.0 million ($2.7 million, net of tax benefit, or $.04 per share-diluted). For more information about our restructuring and joint venture dissolution, see "Other operating (income) expense" in Footnote 1, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies," of our Notes to Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. During 1999, we acquired two businesses. The acquisitions were accounted for as purchases. Data for the year ended December 31, 1999, include the results of operations of the acquired businesses for the periods subsequent to their acquisitions. (2) During 1998, we initiated a plan to restructure our operations in the United Kingdom and terminated our joint venture with Otto Versand. As a result, we estimated and recorded charges of $11.1 million ($7.4 million, net of tax benefit, or $0.11 per share-diluted). Information about the restructuring and joint venture dissolution are included in "Other operating (income) expense" in Footnote 1, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies," of the Notes to Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this form 10-K. During 1998, we acquired six businesses. The acquisitions were accounted for as purchases. Data for the year ended December 31, 1998, include the results of operations of the acquired businesses for the periods subsequent to their acquisitions. (3) During 1997, we acquired eight businesses.businesses and entered into a joint venture. The acquisitions were accounted for as purchases. Data for the year ended December 31, 1997, include the results of operations of the acquired businesses for the periods subsequent to their acquisitions. (2)(4) During 1996, we acquired 19 businesses. The acquisitions were accounted for as purchases. Data for the year ended December 31, 1996, include the results of operations of the acquired businesses for the periods subsequent to their acquisitions. (3)(5) During 1995, we acquired 10 businesses. The acquisitions were accounted for as purchases. Data for the year ended December 31, 1995, include the results of operations of the acquired businesses for the periods subsequent to their acquisitions. (4) Effective April 30, 1994, we acquired the direct marketing office products distribution business of Reliable. Also during 1994 we acquired two other businesses. The acquisitions were accounted 17 18 for as purchases. Data for the year ended December 31, 1994, include the results of operations of the acquired businesses subsequent to their acquisitions. (5)(6) Information concerning basic and diluted earnings per share and pro forma earnings per share is included in Note 2,1, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies"Policies," of the Notes to Financial Statements in our 1997 Annual Report and is incorporated herein by reference.Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION - ------ ------------------------------------------------------------ AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Management's discussion------------------------- Financial Review
Results of Operations - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Excluding Excluding As Non-routine As Non-routine Reported Items Reported Items 1999 1999(1) 1998 1998(1) 1997 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Net sales $3,381.7 $3,381.7 $3,067.3 $3,067.3 $2,596.7 Percent increase 10.2% 10.2% 18.1% 18.1% 30.8% Cost of sales 2,511.9 2,512.7 2,278.8 2,277.9 1,941.7 Percent of net sales 74.3% 74.3% 74.3% 74.3% 74.8% Gross profit 869.8 869.0 788.5 789.4 655.0 Percent of net sales 25.7% 25.7% 25.7% 25.7% 25.2% Operating expenses 716.4 719.6 668.0 657.9 535.8 Percent of net sales 21.2% 21.3% 21.8% 21.4% 20.6% Income from operations 153.4 149.4 120.5 131.6 119.3 Percent of net sales 4.5% 4.4% 3.9% 4.3% 4.6% Interest expense 24.4 24.4 25.9 25.9 20.2 Income tax expense 55.6 54.2 42.8 46.5 42.9 Tax provision rate 42.7% 43.0% 44.8% 43.5% 43.0% Net income $ 74.9 $ 72.2 $ 53.1 $ 60.5 $ 56.9 Percent of net sales 2.2% 2.1% 1.7% 2.0% 2.2% - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Before impact of European restructuring and analysisjoint venture dissolution (see 'Restructuring Charge' section) Net Sales Our business strategy over the past three years has included aggressive sales growth. This has been accomplished principally by increasing sales in existing operations and completing acquisitions. Same-location sales growth was 8% for 1999 compared to 1998 and 11% for 1998 compared to 1997. Both paper price changes and foreign currency fluctuations impact same-location sales growth. Paper represents approximately 15% of net sales. Revenues from operations outside the United States represent about 24% of net sales. Holding paper prices constant and excluding the impact of foreign currency changes, our same-location sales growth was not materially affected for 1999 and would have been 12% for 1998. We completed two acquisitions in 1999, six acquisitions in 1998, and eight acquisitions in 1997(see "Acquisitions" section). Businesses acquired during 1998 contributed approximately $36 million to our 1998 net sales and approximately $65 million to our 1999 net sales. Businesses acquired during 1997 contributed approximately $167 million to our 1997 net sales and approximately $356 million to our 1998 net sales. The increases are primarily due to a full calendar year of ownership in the second year. Cost of Sales and Gross Profit Cost of sales includes the cost of merchandise sold, the cost to deliver products to customers, and the occupancy costs of our facilities. Gross profit as a percent of net sales in 1999 was essentially flat compared to 1998. Margins in several of our businesses improved in 1999, primarily due to lower procurement costs. The improvements, however, were offset by increasing global paper prices, which were not entirely passed on to customers, and growth in our technology business, which has lower gross margins. The 1998 increase in gross profit as a percent of net sales over 1997 was due, in part, to having a full calendar year of results of our French direct marketing subsidiary, Jean-Paul Guisset S.A. ("JPG"), included in 1998 (see "Acquisitions" section). JPG has higher gross margins and higher operating expenses than our other operations. The 1998 increase in gross profit was also due to lower procurement costs and to leveraging our fixed occupancy costs over a higher sales volume. Operating Expenses Operating expenses primarily include selling, warehouse, and administrative payroll; prospecting for direct marketing customers; systems expenses and software amortization; travel and entertainment; and goodwill amortization. The 1999 decrease in operating expenses as a percent of net sales, before nonroutine items, compared to 1998, was partly due to lower operating costs in Canada as we resolved operational challenges associated with the move into our Toronto warehouse. The improvement was partly offset by increased investment in our growth initiatives, including Boise Express, our middle-market sales effort, and expansion of our electronic commerce capabilities. Goodwill amortization was 0.4% of net sales in both 1999 and 1998. The 1998 increase in operating expenses as a percent of net sales over 1997 was partly due to having a full year of operating expenses for JPG. JPG has higher gross margins and higher operating expenses than our other operations. The increase was also due to higher operating cost structures, relative to revenues, for several of our European operations; additional costs as a result of operational challenges associated with the move into a new Toronto warehouse; and costs for customer prospecting as part of our entry into the Belgium direct marketing business. In addition, operating expenses were negatively impacted by costs related to our European restructuring and joint venture dissolution (see "Restructuring Charge" section). Goodwill amortization was 0.4% of net sales in both 1998 and 1997. Income from Operations Excluding the impact of nonroutine items, income from operations for 1999 as a percent of net sales was flat compared to 1998. Income from operations for 1999 includes an improvement of approximately $4.2 million in our European operations affected by our restructuring efforts. This improvement is primarily non-cash and is mainly due to the elimination of losses from our joint venture with Otto Versand. Excluding the impact of nonroutine items, income from operations for 1998 as a percent of net sales was relatively flat compared to 1997. Interest Expense Interest expense decreased in 1999 over 1998 primarily due to lower debt levels. Interest expense increased in 1998 over 1997 due, in part, to debt incurred in conjunction with our acquisition and capital spending programs. The increase in 1998 was also due to our issuance of $150 million of 7.05% Notes in May 1998 which have a slightly higher interest rate than the debt, which was displaced, under our revolving credit agreement. Income Tax Expense The decrease in our tax rate in 1999 was partly due to the decreased impact of nondeductible goodwill relative to earnings and to a reduction in the tax rate in France. The increase in our tax rate in 1998 resulted partly from a shift in earnings among our foreign operations and the impact of nondeductible goodwill. The 1998 tax rate was also significantly increased by the European restructuring and joint venture dissolution (see "Restructuring Charge" section). Net Income Excluding nonroutine items associated with restructuring, net income for 1999 increased 19% over net income for 1998. Excluding the impact of the European restructuring and joint venture dissolution, 1998 net income increased 6% over net income for 1997. BUSINESS OUTLOOK Our core North American operations experienced solid same-location sales growth and operating profits in 1999. We continue to expect our cross-selling efforts in computer supplies, furniture, paper, and promotional products to result in additional sales to our existing customers. We have developed an approach to serve the middle-market, which represents businesses of 25 to 100 employees. Boise Express, our custom-designed sales effort, targets this market. To accelerate this opportunity, we are opening a new outbound telesales center in the first quarter of 2000. Growth potential also exists in developing procurement management offerings for our customers, including further investments in components of integrated supply and expansion of our electronic commerce capabilities. The pace of our revenue growth will partially depend on the success of these initiatives. We are seeing merger-driven consolidations not only among some of our large customers but also among some of our key competitors. As a result, continued same-location sales growth will depend, in part, on conditions outside our control. Our sales growth also depends, in part, on our ability to identify appropriate acquisition candidates in the U.S. and internationally. Over the past several years, acquisitions have contributed significantly to our revenue growth. Although our acquisition pace has slowed, acquisitions remain an important part of our growth strategy. We will continue to pursue acquisitions of businesses that fit our business model. Our French and Australian operations are performing well, posting double-digit sales growth and operating income improvement. We are continuing to develop our direct marketing operations in Spain and Belgium, both of which are progressing nicely. In the U.K., our sales are lower after the restructuring, which is consistent with our expectations, but our operating cost structure is much improved. We plan to use the new order-management system we recently installed in the U.K. to support our pan-European contract operations. We believe our gross margins will continue to be impacted principally by the competitive environment in which we operate, including the pricing strategies established by our competitors. While we believe our efforts to lower our procurement costs will be successful over time, there is no assurance that our gross margins may not decline under competitive pressure. In addition, office paper, which represents about 15% of our net sales, has historically impacted our gross margins and operating margins as paper prices rise or fall. We are uncertain as to the timing or magnitude of any future changes in paper prices. Also, it is difficult to accurately predict what favorable or adverse impact changes in paper prices might have on our future gross margins or financial results. However, we believe our office paper business can be managed to maintain acceptable margins and cost effectively provide our customers with this important product. To a lesser extent, our gross margins will be impacted by our ability to lower our delivery costs and leverage our fixed occupancy costs. Continued increases in fuel prices will likely have an adverse affect on our delivery costs. Gross margins and operating expense ratios generally vary among product categories, distribution channels, and geographic locations. As a result, we expect some fluctuation in these ratios over time as our sales mix evolves. We believe inflation has not had a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations. However, there can be no assurance that our business will not be affected by inflation in the future. Although particular items we sell are seasonal (e.g. calendars and specialty gift items), our sales overall are not subject to significant seasonal variations. RESTRUCTURING CHARGE In the fourth quarter of 1998, we initiated a plan to restructure our operations in the United Kingdom (the "restructuring"). The restructuring involved closing seven small facilities and an administrative office and integrating selected functions of our U.K. subsidiaries. The closures were completed during 1999. Also during December 1998, we terminated our joint venture with Otto Versand ("Otto") at a cost of approximately $4.0 million. As a result of the dissolution of the joint venture, Otto acquired our 50% interest in the joint venture. In addition, we repurchased Otto's 10% ownership interest in JPG. Now JPG is 100% owned by the Company. As a result of the restructuring and joint venture dissolution, we estimated and recorded charges of $11.1 million ($7.4 million, net of tax benefit or $.11 per share-diluted). These charges, with the exception of inventory-related amounts, were included in "Other operating expense" in the Statements of Income. The inventory-related amounts totaled about $1.0 million and were reflected in "Cost of Sales" in the Statements of Income. During the second quarter of 1999, we revised the amount of the restructuring reserve that we established in the fourth quarter of 1998 for our U.K. operations. The restructuring program was less costly than originally anticipated due to lower legal and professional fees, a sublease on one of the facilities, a decision to retain a small printing portion of the business, and fewer terminations of employees. As a result, we recorded an increase to operating income of approximately $4.0 million ($2.7 million, net of tax benefit or $.04 per share-diluted) in the second quarter of 1999. Of this amount, about $3.2 million was included in "Other operating income" and about $0.8 million was included in "Cost of sales" in the Statements of Income. The restructuring liability is included in "Accrued liabilities, other" in the Balance Sheets. Changes in the reserve balance through December 31, 1999, were as follows:
Termination Legal and payments to professional Leasehold Other Inventory employees fees terminations costs writedown Total --------- ---- ------------ ----- --------- ----- (in thousands) 1998 Expense recorded $ 1,400 $ 900 $ 3,400 $ 4,400 $ 1,000 $11,100 Charges against reserve (200) - - (3,600) - (3,800) Balance at ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- December 31, 1998 1,200 900 3,400 800 1,000 7,300 Charges against reserve (700) (200) (400) (300) (200) (1,800) Reserves credited to income (500) (600) (1,600) (500) (800) (4,000) ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Balance at December 31, 1999 $ - $ 100 $ 1,400 $ - $ - $ 1,500 ======== ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
Termination payments to employees are the result of workforce reductions of about 90 warehouse and administrative support associates. ACQUISITIONS In January 1999, we acquired the office supply business of Wallace Computer Services, with annualized sales of about $40 million at the time of announcement. In September 1999, we acquired Supply West, based in Australia, with annualized sales of about US$10 million at the time of announcement. In 1998, we acquired six businesses, including one in Spain and two in Canada. The annualized sales of the acquisitions completed in 1998 were approximately US$62 million at the time of announcement. In December 1998, the Company and Otto Versand dissolved the joint venture that we entered into in 1997. Otto acquired our 50% interest in the joint venture. In addition, we repurchased Otto's 10% interest in JPG. JPG is now 100% owned by the Company. In 1997, we acquired eight businesses and entered into a joint venture, including two companies in France and one in the United Kingdom. The annualized sales of the acquisitions completed in 1997 were US$340 million at the time of announcement. Goodwill, net of amortization, was $475 million at December 31, 1999 and $495 million at December 31, 1998. We used purchase accounting to record our acquisitions. For more information on our acquisitions, see Note 8 in our Notes to Financial Statements. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES Our principal requirements for cash have been to make acquisitions, fund technology development and working capital needs, expand our facilities at existing locations, and open new distribution centers. The execution of our strategy for growth, including acquisitions, technology developments, expansion at existing locations, and the relocation of several existing distribution centers into new and larger facilities, is expected to require capital outlays over the next several years. In 1999, capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions, were approximately $12 million for capitalized software and approximately $48 million for facility expansions and relocations and equipment. Capital expenditures in 2000 are expected to approach $100 million, excluding acquisitions, and to include the same types of items as in the past few years. To finance our capital requirements, we expect to rely upon funds from a combination of sources. In addition to cash flow from operations, we have a $450 million revolving credit agreement that expires in 2001 and provides for variable rates of interest based on customary indices. The revolving credit agreement is available for acquisitions and general corporate purposes. It contains financial and other covenants, including a negative pledge and covenants specifying a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and a maximum leverage ratio. The amount outstanding under this agreement totaled $190 million at December 31, 1999. The weighted average interest rate for these borrowings was 5.5% at December 31, 1999. We may, subject to the covenants contained in the credit agreement and to market conditions, refinance existing debt or raise additional funds through the agreement and through other external debt or equity financings in the future. In October 1998, we entered into an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $25 million that expires in 2000. The swap results in an effective fixed interest rate of 5.0% with respect to $25 million of our revolving credit agreement borrowings. In addition to the amount outstanding under the revolving credit agreement and Notes, we had short-term notes payable of $19.3 million at December 31, 1999. The maximum amount of short-term notes payable outstanding during the year ended December 31, 1999, was $111.9 million. The average amount of short-term notes payable during the 12 months ended December 31, 1999, was $66.6 million. The weighted average interest rate for these borrowings was 5.5%. For more information about our debt, see Note 4 in our Notes to Financial Statements. During 1998, we filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission to register $300 million of shelf capacity for debt securities. In May 1998, we issued $150 million of 7.05% Notes ("Notes") under this registration statement. The Notes are due May 15, 2005. Proceeds from the issuance were used to repay borrowings under our revolving credit agreement. We have $150 million remaining under this registration statement. In addition to borrowings under the revolving credit agreement, Notes, and short-term borrowings, debt assumed through acquisitions was $3.4 million and $6.1 million at December 31, 1999 and 1998. As a result of our acquisition activity, we also had short-term acquisition liabilities of $48.3 million, primarily for the JPG price supplement, and $5.7 million at December 31, 1999 and 1998, which were included in "Other accrued liabilities." We had no long- term acquisition liabilities at December 31, 1999. We had long-term acquisition liabilities of $51.6 million, primarily for the JPG price supplement, at December 31, 1998, which were included in "Other long-term liabilities." On June 17, 1996, we filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission for 4.4 million shares of common stock to be offered by the Company from time to time in connection with future acquisitions. At December 31, 1999, 3.8 million shares remain unissued under this registration statement. On September 25, 1997, we issued 2.25 million shares of common stock at $21.55 per share to Boise Cascade Corporation for total proceeds of $48.5 million. At December 31, 1999, Boise Cascade Corporation owned 81.1% of our outstanding common stock. In December 1999, BCC announced a proposal to acquire our outstanding public shares. On March 12, 2000, BCC and BCOP entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger in which BCC would purchase all of BCOP's publicly held shares for $16.50 in cash. In accordance with that Agreement, BCC commenced a tender offer for our minority public shares on March 22, 2000. The offer will expire on April 19, 2000, unless it is extended. If BCC is successful in obtaining a majority of the minority shares, it will purchase the remaining shares through a short-form merger. If BCC completes the tender and merger, we will again become a wholly-owned subsidiary of BCC. FINANCIAL CONDITION Cash provided by operations in 1999 was $137 million. This was the result of $125 million of net income, depreciation and amortization, and other noncash items and a $12 million net decrease in certain components of working capital. Net cash used for investment was $83 million, which included $48 million for facility expansions and relocations and equipment and $9 million for acquisitions. Net cash used for financing was $61 million, which included a $53 million decrease in short-term borrowings and a $9 million net decrease in long- term debt. Cash provided by operations in 1998 was $73 million. This was the result of $107 million of net income, depreciation and amortization, and other noncash items, offset by a $34 million net increase in certain components of working capital. Net cash used for investment was $115 million, which included $66 million for facility expansions and relocations and equipment and $27 million for acquisitions. Net cash provided by financing was $44 million, which included a $49 million increase in short-term borrowings, offset by a $4 million net decrease in long-term debt. Cash provided by operations in 1997 was $120 million. This was the result of $98 million of net income, depreciation and amortization, and other noncash items, and a $22 million net decrease in certain components of working capital. Net cash used for investment was $350 million, which included $67 million for facility expansions and relocations and equipment and $254 million for acquisitions. Net cash provided by financing was $246 million, which included $212 million borrowed under the revolving credit agreement and $48 million of proceeds from the issuance of our common stock, offset by the payment of $13 million of short-term borrowings. DISCLOSURES OF CERTAIN FINANCIAL MARKET RISKS Changes in interest rates and currency rates expose the company to financial market risk. Our debt is a combination of variable-rate and fixed-rate debt. We experience only modest changes in interest expense when market interest rates change. Consequently, our market risk-sensitive instruments do not subject us to material market risk exposure. Approximately 24% of our 1999 revenues were generated from operations outside the United States. Our operations in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Spain, and the United Kingdom are denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars. Most foreign currency transactions have been conducted in the local currency, with minimal cross- border product movement, limiting our exposure to changes in currency rates. Changes in our debt and our continued international expansion could increase these risks. To manage volatility relating to these exposures, we may enter into various derivative transactions such as interest rate swaps, rate hedge agreements, and forward exchange contracts. We use interest rate swaps and rate hedge agreements to hedge underlying debt obligations or anticipated transactions. For qualifying hedges, our financial statements reflect interest rate differentials as adjustments to interest expense over the life of the swap or underlying debt. We defer gains and losses related to qualifying hedges of foreign currency firm commitments and anticipated transactions, and we recognize such gains and losses in income or as adjustments of carrying amounts when the hedged transaction occurs. We mark to market all other forward exchange contracts and include unrealized gains and losses in current period net income. We had no material exposure to losses from derivative financial instruments held at December 31, 1999. We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. The following table provides information about our derivative financial instruments and other financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates, including interest rate swaps and debt obligations. For debt obligations, the table presents principal cash flows and related weighted average interest rates by expected maturity dates. For interest rate swaps, the table presents notional amounts and weighted average interest rates by expected maturity dates. Notional amounts are used to calculate the contractual payments to be exchanged under the contract. For obligations with variable interest rates, the table sets forth payout amounts based on the current rates and does not attempt to project future interest rates.
December 31 December 31 1999 1998 ------------ ------------ Fair Fair (in millions) 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Thereafter Total Value Total Value ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ---------- ------ ------ ------ ------ Debt Short-term borrowings $19.3 - - - - - $ 19.3 $ 19.3 $ 72.1 $ 72.1 Average interest rates 5.7% - - - - - 5.7% - 6.3% - Long-term debt Fixed rate debt $ 2.2 $ 1.0 $25.7 $ 0.4 $ 0.2 $150.6 $180.1 $171.2 $177.7 $173.8 Average interest rates 6.0% 5.5% 5.0% 6.6% 2.9% 7.0% 6.7% - 6.7% - Variable rate debt $ 0.7 $165.7 $ 0.7 $ 0.3 - - $167.4 $167.4 $178.6 $178.6 Average interest rates 3.7% 6.9% 3.7% 3.7% - - 6.8% - 5.8% - Interest rate swaps Notional principal amount of interest rate exchange agreements (variable to fixed) $25.0 - - - - - $ 25.0 $ 0.4 $ 25.0 $ 0.2 Average pay rate 4.6% - - - - - 4.6% - 4.6% - Average receive rate 5.2% - - - - - 5.2% - 5.2% -
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." This Statement establishes accounting and reporting standards requiring that every derivative instrument (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) be recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value. In July 1999, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 137 that delayed the effective date of Statement 133 until fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000. We plan to adopt this Statement in the first quarter of 2001. We are in the process of reviewing this Statement. Adoption of this Statement is not expected to have a significant impact on our results of operations are presented underor financial position. YEAR 2000 ISSUE We have incurred costs over the caption "Financial Review"last several years for year 2000-compliant computer system additions, replacements, and upgrades in order to realize efficiencies and process improvements. These costs were generally capitalized and amortized over the expected useful life of the software (see Note 1 in the Notes to Financial Statements). Many of our 1997 Annual Reportexisting computer systems were already year 2000-compliant, and are incorporated herein by reference.we modified noncompliant systems before the end of 1999. The overall incremental costs to make our systems year 2000-compliant were about $4.5 million. These costs were expensed as incurred. Our critical business systems operated smoothly through the transition to the year 2000, and service to our customers was not interrupted. ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK - ------- ---------------------------------------------------------- Information concerning quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk is included under the caption "Disclosures of Certain Financial Market Risks" of our management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations and is incorporated herein by reference.operations. ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA - ------ ------------------------------------------- INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page ---- Report of Independent Public Accountants F-1 Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 F-2 Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998, and 1997 F-3 Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998, and 1997 F-4 Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998, and 1997 F-5 Notes to Financial Statements F-6 Report of Management F-7
Report of Independent Public Accountants To the Shareholders of Boise Cascade Office Products Corporation: We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Boise Cascade Office Products Corporation (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related statements of income, cash flows, and shareholders' equity for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998, and 1997. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Boise Cascade Office Products Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1999, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. /s/Arthur Andersen LLP Boise, Idaho January 28, 2000 F-1 Balance Sheets
December 31 1999 1998 ---- ---- (in thousands, except share information) Assets - ------ Current Cash and cash equivalents $ 25,038 $ 31,838 Receivables, less allowances of $9,112 and $9,539 449,753 394,013 Inventories 234,313 226,955 Deferred income tax benefits 17,121 14,335 Other 34,285 31,532 ---------- ---------- 760,510 698,673 ---------- ---------- Property Land 28,292 28,572 Buildings and improvements 155,798 143,192 Furniture and equipment 244,481 214,611 Accumulated depreciation (182,190) (149,071) ---------- ---------- 246,381 237,304 ---------- ---------- Goodwill, net of amortization of $51,908 and $37,108 475,271 494,883 Other assets 54,155 30,885 ---------- ---------- Total assets $1,536,317 $1,461,745 ========== ========== Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity - ------------------------------------ Current Notes payable $ 19,300 $ 72,100 Current portion of long-term debt 2,810 2,065 Accounts payable Trade and other 328,412 279,928 Boise Cascade Corporation 35,608 29,297 ---------- ---------- 364,020 309,225 ---------- ---------- Accrued liabilities Compensation and benefits 47,256 38,144 Income taxes payable 16,910 796 Taxes, other than income 11,691 9,466 Other 71,454 36,861 ---------- ---------- 147,311 85,267 ---------- ---------- 533,441 468,657 ---------- ---------- Other Long-term debt, less current portion 344,386 354,224 Other 25,384 75,950 ---------- ---------- 369,770 430,174 ---------- ---------- Commitments and contingent liabilities Shareholders' Equity Common stock, $.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized; 65,806,612 and 65,758,524 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 1999 and 1998 658 658 Additional paid-in capital 359,643 359,224 Retained earnings 283,337 208,480 Accumulated other comprehensive loss (10,532) (5,448) ---------- ---------- Total shareholders' equity 633,106 562,914 ---------- ---------- Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $1,536,317 $1,461,745 ========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Financial Statements. F-2 Statements of Income
Year ended December 31 1999 1998 1997 ------------- ------------ ------------ (in thousands, except share information) Net sales $3,381,725 $3,067,327 $2,596,732 Cost of sales, including inventory purchased from Boise Cascade Corporation of $306,414, $278,720, and $228,189 2,511,882 2,278,845 1,941,702 ---------- ---------- ---------- Gross profit 869,843 788,482 655,030 ---------- ---------- ---------- Selling and warehouse operating expense 653,575 593,672 483,241 Corporate general and administrative expense, including amounts paid to Boise Cascade Corporation of $3,272, $2,578, and $2,578 51,220 51,505 41,606 Goodwill amortization 14,800 12,673 10,933 Other operating (income) expense (3,195) 10,138 - ---------- ---------- ---------- 716,400 667,988 535,780 ---------- ---------- ---------- Income from operations 153,443 120,494 119,250 Interest expense 24,387 25,914 20,165 Other income, net 1,371 1,331 699 ---------- ---------- ---------- Income before income taxes 130,427 95,911 99,784 Income tax expense 55,570 42,844 42,898 ---------- ---------- ---------- Net income $ 74,857 $ 53,067 $ 56,886 ========== ========== ========== Earnings per share-basic $1.14 $.81 $.89 ===== ==== ==== Average common shares outstanding-basic 65,795,674 65,741,572 64,133,989 ========== ========== ========== Earnings per share-diluted $1.14 $.81 $.89 ===== ==== ==== Average common shares outstanding-diluted 65,811,833 65,791,840 64,252,359 ========== ========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Financial Statements. F-3 Statements of Cash Flows
Year ended December 31 1999 1998 1997 --------- ---------- ---------- (in thousands) Cash provided by (used for) operations Net income $ 74,857 $ 53,067 $ 56,886 Items in income not using (providing) cash Depreciation and amortization 60,698 50,911 41,088 Deferred income taxes (6,544) (5,087) (167) Restructuring charge and writedown of assets (3,988) 7,981 - Receivables (55,740) (30,398) 2,230 Inventories (3,909) (26,007) 555 Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 62,100 28,250 35,912 Current and deferred income taxes 4,635 896 (9,039) Other, net 5,022 (6,243) (7,558) -------- --------- --------- Cash provided by operations 137,131 73,370 119,907 -------- --------- --------- Cash used for investment Expenditures for property and equipment (47,628) (65,974) (66,876) Acquisitions (9,369) (27,282) (254,025) Other, net (25,580) (21,488) (29,047) -------- --------- --------- Cash used for investment (82,577) (114,744) (349,948) -------- --------- --------- Cash provided by (used for) financing Additions to long-term debt 80,800 210,000 211,988 Payments of long-term debt (89,893) (214,385) - Notes payable (52,800) 48,800 (13,400) Sale of stock - - 48,463 Other, net 539 42 (1,017) -------- --------- --------- Cash provided by (used for) financing (61,354) 44,457 246,034 -------- --------- --------- Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (6,800) 3,083 15,993 Balance at beginning of the year 31,838 28,755 12,762 -------- --------- --------- Balance at end of the year $ 25,038 $ 31,838 $ 28,755 ======== ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Financial Statements. F-4 Statements of Shareholders' Equity (in thousands, except share information)
Accumulated Total Additional Other Shares For the years ended Shareholders' Common Paid-In Retained Comprehensive Outstanding December 31, 1997, 1998, and 1999 Equity Stock Capital Earnings Income (Loss) - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 62,750,318 Balance at December 31, 1996 $404,785 $628 $304,134 $ 98,527 $ 1,496 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Comprehensive income Net income 56,886 56,886 Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment (8,135) (8,135) Minimum pension liability adjustment (394) (394) -------- Other comprehensive loss (8,529) -------- Comprehensive income 48,357 -------- 563,472 Stock issued for acquisitions 3,632 5 3,627 24,468 Stock options exercised 374 374 2,250,000 Issuance of stock 48,487 23 48,464 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 65,588,258 Balance at December 31, 1997 505,635 656 356,599 155,413 (7,033) - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Comprehensive income Net income 53,067 53,067 Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment, net of reclassification 2,218 2,218 Minimum pension liability adjustment (633) (633) -------- Other comprehensive income 1,585 -------- Comprehensive income 54,652 -------- 17,932 Stock issued for acquisitions 20 20 152,334 Stock options exercised 2,607 2 2,605 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 65,758,524 Balance at December 31,1998 562,914 658 359,224 208,480 (5,448) - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Comprehensive income Net income 74,857 74,857 Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment (5,653) (5,653) Minimum pension liability adjustment 569 569 -------- Other comprehensive loss (5,084) -------- Comprehensive income 69,773 -------- 41,688 Stock issued for acquisitions 333 333 6,400 Stock options exercised 86 86 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 65,806,612 Balance at December 31, 1999 $633,106 $658 $359,643 $283,337 $(10,532) - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Financial Statements. F-5 NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies CONSOLIDATION AND USE OF ESTIMATES The financial statements include the accounts of BCOP and all subsidiaries after elimination of intercompany balances and transactions. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may vary from those estimates. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS Cash and cash equivalents include time deposits and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. INVENTORIES Inventories consist of finished goods and are valued at the lower of cost or market, with cost based on an approximation of the first-in, first-out valuation method. PROPERTY Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Cost consists of expenditures for major improvements and replacements, including interest cost associated with capital additions. Capitalized interest was $204,000 in 1999 and $1,025,000 in 1998. Gains and losses from sales and retirements are included in income as they occur. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives: Buildings and improvements 5 to 40 years Furniture and fixtures 3 to 5 years Machinery, equipment, and delivery trucks 5 to 10 years Leasehold improvements 5 to 10 years GOODWILL Costs in excess of values assigned to the underlying net assets of acquired companies are being amortized on the straight-line method over 40 years. Annually, we review the recoverability of goodwill. The measurement of possible impairment is based primarily on the ability to recover the balance of the goodwill from expected future operating cash flows of the businesses acquired on an undiscounted basis. In management's opinion, no material impairment exists at December 31, 1999. DEFERRED SOFTWARE COSTS We defer certain software costs that benefit future years. These costs are amortized on the straight-line method over the expected useful life of the product. Balance Sheets include deferred software costs of $31,989,000 and $26,932,000 at December 31, 1999 and 1998. Amortization of deferred software costs totaled $8,645,000, $6,542,000, and $3,596,000 in 1999, 1998, and 1997 and is included in "Selling and warehouse operating expense." REVENUE RECOGNITION Revenues are recorded at the time of shipment of products or performance of services. COST OF SALES Cost of sales related to merchandise inventory is primarily determined using estimated product costs and adjusted to actual costs at the time of physical inventories, which are taken at all locations at least annually. Additional adjustments to reflect actual experience are recognized as appropriate throughout the year. Cost of sales also includes the cost to deliver products to customers and the occupancy costs of our facilities. ADVERTISING AND CATALOGS We expense the cost of advertising the first time the advertising takes place, except for catalog costs. Costs of producing and distributing sales catalogs are capitalized and charged to expense in the periods in which the related sales occur. Advertising expense was $74,284,000 in 1999, $70,492,000 in 1998, and $54,776,000 in 1997 and is included in "Selling and warehouse operating expense." Capitalized catalog costs totaled $16,121,000 and $14,636,000 at December 31, 1999 and 1998, and are included in "Other current assets." OTHER OPERATING (INCOME) EXPENSE In the fourth quarter of 1998, we initiated a plan to restructure our operations in the United Kingdom (the "restructuring"). The restructuring involved closing seven small facilities and an administrative office and integrating selected functions of our U.K. subsidiaries. The closures were completed during 1999. Also during December 1998, we terminated our joint venture with Otto Versand ("Otto") at a cost of approximately $4,000,000. As a result of the dissolution of the joint venture, Otto acquired our 50% interest in the joint venture. In addition, we repurchased Otto's 10% ownership interest in Jean-Paul Guisset S.A. ("JPG"), our direct marketing subsidiary in France. We now own 100% of JPG. As a result of the restructuring and joint venture dissolution, we estimated and recorded charges of $11,098,000 ($7,446,000, net of tax benefit or $.11 per share-diluted). These charges, with the exception of inventory-related amounts, were included in "Other operating expense" in the Statements of Income. The inventory-related amounts totaled about $960,000 and were reflected in "Cost of sales" in the Statements of Income. During the second quarter of 1999, we revised the amount of the restructuring reserve that we established in the fourth quarter of 1998 for our U.K. operations. The restructuring program was less costly than originally anticipated due to lower legal and professional fees, a sublease on one of the facilities, a decision to retain a small printing portion of the business, and fewer terminations of employees. As a result, we recorded an increase to operating income of approximately $4,000,000 ($2,700,000, net of tax benefit or $.04 per share-diluted) in the second quarter of 1999. Of this amount, about $3,200,000 was included in "Other operating income" and about $800,000 was included in "Cost of sales" in the Statements of Income. The restructuring liability is included in "Accrued liabilities, other" in the Balance Sheets. Changes in the reserve balance through December 31, 1999, were as follows:
Termination Legal and payments to professional Leasehold Other Inventory employees fees terminations costs writedown Total ----------- ------------ ------------ ------- --------- ------- (in thousands) 1998 Expense recorded $ 1,400 $ 900 $ 3,400 $ 4,400 $ 1,000 $ 11,100 Charges against reserve (200) - - (3,600) - (3,800) Balance at ------- ------- -------- -------- -------- --------- December 31, 1998 1,200 900 3,400 800 1,000 7,300 Charges against reserve (700) (200) (400) (300) (200) (1,800) Reserves credited to income (500) (600) (1,600) (500) (800) (4,000) -------- ------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Balance at December 31, 1999 $ - $ 100 $ 1,400 $ - $ - $ 1,500 ======= ======= ======== ======== ======== ==========
Termination payments to employees are the result of workforce reductions of about 90 warehouse and administrative support associates. EARNINGS PER SHARE Basic earnings per share was computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per share includes the weighted average impact of stock options assumed exercised using the treasury method.
Year ended December 31 1999 1998 1997 ---------- ---------- ---------- (in thousands, except share data) Basic Net income $74,857 $53,067 $56,886 ======= ======= ======= Weighted average shares outstanding 65,781,647 65,715,120 63,788,448 Effect of contingent shares 14,027 26,452 345,541 ---------- ---------- ---------- 65,795,674 65,741,572 64,133,989 ========== ========== ========== Basic earnings per share $1.14 $ .81 $ .89 ===== ===== ===== Diluted Net income $74,857 $53,067 $56,886 ======= ======= ======= Weighted average shares outstanding 65,781,647 65,715,120 63,788,448 Effect of contingent shares 14,027 26,452 345,541 Effect of options 16,159 50,268 118,370 ---------- ---------- ---------- 65,811,833 65,791,840 64,252,359 ========== ========== ========== Diluted earnings per share $1.14 $ .81 $ .89 ===== ===== =====
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION Local currencies are considered the functional currencies for our operations outside the United States. Assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars at the rate of exchange in effect at the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars at average monthly exchange rates prevailing during the year. Resulting translation adjustments are included in "Accumulated other comprehensive loss" in the Balance Sheets. PRE-OPENING COSTS Costs associated with opening new locations are expensed as incurred. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS At December 31, 1999, the estimated current market value of our debt, based on then current interest rates for similar obligations with like maturities, was approximately $9,000,000 less than the amount of debt reported on the Balance Sheet. At December 31, 1999, we had an interest rate swap. The liquidation value of the swap, based on interest rates available for instruments with similar characteristics, would have resulted in a payment to us of approximately $400,000. The estimated fair values of our other financial instruments, cash and cash equivalents, and short-term borrowings are the same as their carrying values. In the opinion of management, we do not have any significant concentration of credit risks. Concentration of credit risks with respect to trade receivables is limited due to the wide variety of customers and channels to and through which our products are sold, as well as their dispersion across many geographic areas. We have only limited involvement with derivative financial instruments and do not use them for trading purposes. Financial instruments such as interest rate swaps, rate hedge agreements, and forward exchange contracts are used periodically to manage well-defined risks. Interest swaps and rate hedge agreements are used to hedge underlying debt obligations or anticipated transactions. For qualifying hedges, the interest rate differential is reflected as an adjustment to interest expense over the life of the swap or underlying debt. Gains and losses related to qualifying hedges of foreign currency firm commitments and anticipated transactions are deferred and are recognized in income or as adjustments of carrying amounts when the hedged transaction occurs. All other forward exchange contracts are marked to market, and unrealized gains and losses are included in current period net income. We had no material exposure to losses from derivative financial instruments held at December 31, 1999. We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." This Statement establishes accounting and reporting standards requiring that every derivative instrument (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) be recorded in the Balance Sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value. In July 1999, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 137 that delayed the effective date of Statement 133 until fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000. We plan to adopt this Statement in the first quarter of 2001. We are in the process of reviewing this statement. Adoption of this statement is not expected to have a significant impact on our results of operations or financial position. 2. Transactions with Boise Cascade Corporation The Company was incorporated on January 3, 1995, and until April 13, 1995, was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Boise Cascade Corporation ("BCC"). On April 13, 1995, we completed an initial public offering in the U.S. and a concurrent international offering (the "Offerings"). After the Offerings, BCC owned 82.7% of our outstanding common stock. At December 31, 1999, BCC owned 81.1% of our outstanding common stock. In December 1999, BCC announced a proposal to acquire our outstanding public shares. On March 12, 2000, BCC and BCOP entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger in which BCC would purchase all of BCOP's publicly held shares for $16.50 in cash. In accordance with that Agreement, BCC commenced a tender offer for our minority public shares on March 22, 2000. The offer will expire on April 19, 2000, unless it is extended. If BCC is successful in obtaining a majority of the minority shares, it will purchase the remaining shares through a short-form merger. If BCC completes the tender and merger, we will again become a wholly-owned subsidiary of BCC. We have entered into intercompany agreements with BCC under which BCC, among other things, provides to us certain administrative support functions, certain paper and paper products under a long-term sales agreement, and use (without charge) of the trade names and trademark of BCC. We have also entered into a tax matters agreement with BCC (see Note 3). Under the Administrative Services Agreement ("Admin Agreement"), BCC provides various services to us. The services will be provided for varying periods, from one to five years, as identified in the Admin Agreement, subject to renewal or termination in accordance with the terms of that agreement. We will pay for each of these services at rates set forth in the agreement. These rates are generally consistent with amounts that have been charged by BCC in the past. For the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998, and 1997, charged costs amounted to $3,272,000, $2,578,000, and $2,578,000 and have been included in "Corporate general and administrative expense" in the Statements of Income. Under the Paper Sales Agreement, we agreed to purchase, and BCC agreed to sell, subject to certain exceptions, all of our cut-size paper requirements. The price we pay is based upon a formula meant to approximate prevailing market prices for the paper. The agreement has an initial term of 20 years and will be automatically renewed for five-year periods thereafter, subject to certain conditions. We supplied office products to BCC and purchased certain paper and paper products from BCC. During the year ended December 31, 1999, our sales to BCC were $2,021,000, and our purchases from BCC were $306,072,000. Sales and purchases during the same period of 1998 were $1,077,000 and $281,914,000 and in 1997 were $1,589,000 and $231,188,000. We are included as a participating employer in certain broad-based employee benefit plans sponsored by BCC, which cover our work force. Most assets and liabilities under BCC's employee benefit plans for retirement and postretirement costs arising out of service with the Company were not transferred to us by BCC. Accordingly, no significant assets or liabilities related to retirement and postretirement benefits are included in these financial statements. During each of the years presented, most of our employees participated in a defined benefit pension plan sponsored by BCC. In addition, certain of our employees were eligible for participation in defined contribution plans sponsored by BCC. The Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998, and 1997, include expenses of $10,747,000, $9,788,000, and $7,995,000 attributable to participation by our employees in these plans. Postretirement expenses attributable to participation in BCC's postretirement plans included in the Statements of Income totaled $86,000, $68,000, and $88,000 for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998, and 1997. 3. Income Taxes Pursuant to a tax matters agreement entered into with BCC, income taxes are provided based on a pro forma calculation of the income tax expense that we would incur as a non-affiliated taxpayer. However, as long as BCC owns at least 80% of our outstanding common stock, we will be included in the consolidated federal income tax return of the BCC affiliated group. Accordingly, we remit to BCC amounts representing the current tax liability that we would incur if we were a non-affiliated taxpayer. Pursuant to this agreement, we paid BCC $49,409,000 in 1999, $32,729,000 in 1998, and $40,610,000 in 1997. Income tax expense includes the following:
Year ended December 31 (in thousands) 1999 1998 1997 ---- ---- ---- Current income tax expense: Federal $40,972 $33,433 $28,519 State 7,664 6,288 5,355 Foreign 13,478 8,210 9,191 ------- ------- ------- Total current income tax expense 62,114 47,931 43,065 Deferred income tax expense (benefit): Federal (2,866) 2,018 2,976 State (504) 185 561 Foreign (3,174) (7,290) (3,704) ------- ------- ------- Total deferred income tax benefit (6,544) (5,087) (167) ------- ------- ------- Total income tax expense $55,570 $42,844 $42,898 ======= ======= =======
A reconciliation of the statutory U.S. federal tax expense and our actual tax expense is as follows: Year ended December 31 (in thousands) 1999 1998 1997 ---- ---- ---- Statutory expense $45,549 $33,570 $34,917 Increases in taxes resulting from: Foreign income taxed at rate higher than U.S. rate 4,174 2,680 3,141 State tax expense 4,654 4,207 3,846 All other, net 1,193 2,387 994 ------- ------- ------- Actual tax expense $55,570 $42,844 $42,898 ======= ======= ======= The components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities on the Balance Sheets are as follows: December 31 (in thousands) 1999 1998 Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities ------ ----------- ------ ----------- Property and equipment $ 1,111 $ 4,304 $ 1,104 $ 4,701 Accounts receivable and unearned revenue 7,852 - 3,817 - Deferred charges 11 1,689 2 3,735 Inventories 2,106 - 2,074 - Accrued liabilities 1,550 - 3,163 - Compensation 9,620 812 8,894 325 Goodwill - 9,541 - 9,711 State taxes 746 - 138 - Foreign net operating losses 16,871 - 10,666 - Cumulative translation adjustment 6,713 - 2,842 - Other 8,431 2,724 4,382 3,753 ------- ------- ------- ------- $55,011 $19,070 $37,082 $22,225 ======= ======= ======= ======= At December 31, 1999, our foreign subsidiaries had approximately $11,458,000 of undistributed earnings, which are intended to be indefinitely reinvested. If these earnings were distributed, foreign tax credits should become available under current law to reduce or eliminate the resulting U.S. income tax liability. Our pretax income (loss) from domestic and foreign sources is as follows: Year ended December 31 (in thousands) 1999 1998 1997 -------- --------- ------- Domestic $116,536 $112,890 $98,368 Foreign 13,891 (16,979) 1,416 -------- -------- ------- Pretax income $130,427 $ 95,911 $99,784 ======== ======== ======= 4. Debt On June 26, 1997, we entered into a $450,000,000 revolving credit agreement with a group of banks that expires in June 2001, and provides for variable rates of interest based on customary indices. The revolving credit agreement is available for acquisitions and general corporate purposes. It contains financial and other covenants, including a negative pledge and covenants specifying a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and a maximum leverage ratio. As of December 31, 1999, borrowings under the agreement totaled $190,000,000. The weighted average interest rate of borrowings under the agreement was 5.5% at December 31, 1999. In October 1998, we entered into an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $25,000,000 that expires in 2000. The swap results in an effective fixed interest rate of 5.0% with respect to $25,000,000 of our revolving credit agreement borrowings. We are exposed to credit-related gains or losses in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty to this swap; however, we do not expect the counterparty to fail to meet their obligations. In addition to the amount outstanding under the revolving credit agreement, short-term borrowings at December 31, 1999 and 1998, totaled $19,300,000 and $72,100,000. The maximum amount of short-term notes payable outstanding during the year ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, was $111,900,000 and $116,600,000. The average amount of short-term notes payable during the 12 months ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, was $67,000,000 and $68,000,000. The average interest rate of these short-term borrowings was 5.5% and 5.8% at December 31, 1999 and 1998. Substantially all of our debt is unsecured. During 1998, we filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission to register $300,000,000 of shelf capacity for debt securities. In May 1998, we issued $150,000,000 of 7.05% Notes ("Notes") under this registration statement. The Notes are due May 15, 2005. Proceeds from the issuance were used to repay borrowings under our revolving credit agreement. We have $150,000,000 remaining under this registration statement. In addition to borrowings under the revolving credit agreement, short-term borrowings, and Notes, debt assumed through acquisitions was $3,400,000 and $6,100,000 at December 31, 1999 and 1998. Scheduled payments of long-term debt, excluding our revolving credit agreement and Notes, are $2,810,000 in 2000, $1,702,000 in 2001, $1,381,000 in 2002, $777,000 in 2003, and $730,000 in 2004. Cash paid for interest, net of interest capitalized, for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998, and 1997, was $24,432,000, $27,808,000, and $19,487,000. 5. Shareholders' Equity COMMON STOCK We are authorized to issue 200,000,000 shares of common stock, of which 65,806,612 shares were issued and outstanding at December 31, 1999. On June 17, 1996, we filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission covering approximately 4,400,000 shares of common stock to be offered by BCOP from time to time in connection with acquisitions. As of December 31, 1999, we had 3,828,000 unissued shares remaining under this registration statement. On September 25, 1997, we issued 2,250,000 shares of common stock to BCC at the price of $21.55 per share for proceeds of approximately $48,500,000. At December 31, 1999, BCC owned 81.1% of our outstanding common stock. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) At December 31, 1999, the balance shown on the Statements of Shareholders' Equity for Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) consisted of a minimum pension liability adjustment of ($482,000) and a cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment of ($10,050,000). 6. Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation We have two stock option plans, the Key Executive Stock Option Plan ("KESOP") and the Director Stock Option Plan ("DSOP"). We account for these plans under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees." Under this opinion, no compensation cost has been recognized. If we had determined compensation cost for these plans consistent with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," 1999 net income would have been reduced pro forma by $2,859,000 and earnings per share would have been reduced pro forma by $.05. Our 1998 net income would have been reduced pro forma by $2,840,000, and earnings per share would have been reduced pro forma by $.04. Our 1997 net income would have been reduced pro forma by $2,464,000 and earnings per share would have been reduced pro forma by $.04. The pro forma compensation cost may not be representative of that to be expected in future years. The KESOP provides for the grant of options to purchase shares of our common stock to key employees of the Company. The exercise price of the options is equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date the options are granted. One-third of the options become exercisable in each of the three years following the grant date and expire, at the latest, 10 years following the grant date. A summary of the status of the KESOP at December 31, 1999, 1998, and 1997, and changes during the years then ended is presented in the table and narrative below.
1999 1998 1997 Wtd. Avg. Wtd. Avg. Wtd. Avg. Shares Ex. Price Shares Ex. Price Shares Ex. Price ------ --------- ------ --------- ------ --------- Balance at beginning of the year 2,021,105 $19.86 1,490,139 $20.10 1,059,442 $18.66 Options granted 1,031,300 12.81 782,200 18.22 495,700 23.08 Options exercised (6,400) 12.50 (152,334) 12.50 (24,468) 12.50 Options expired (95,540) 17.78 (98,900) 21.92 (40,535) 22.38 --------- --------- --------- Balance at end of the year 2,950,465 17.48 2,021,105 19.86 1,490,139 20.10 --------- --------- --------- Exercisable at end of the year 1,330,965 20.11 826,305 19.13 483,039 16.72 Weighted average fair value of options granted (Black-Scholes) $4.58 $6.78 $8.61
The 2,950,465 options outstanding at December 31, 1999, have exercise prices between $12.50 and $26.625 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 7.7 years. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, with the following weighted average assumptions used for grants in 1999, 1998, and 1997: risk-free interest rates of 5.1%, 5.5%, and 6.1%; no expected dividends; expected lives of 4.2 years for each year; and expected stock price volatility of 35% for each year. The DSOP, available only to our nonemployee directors, provides for annual grants of options. The exercise price of options under this plan is equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date the options are granted. The options expire the earlier of three years after the director ceases to be a director or 10 years after the grant date. Total shares outstanding at December 31, 1999, 1998, and 1997, were 89,000, 64,000, and 39,000 with weighted average exercise prices of $15.31, $16.99, and $18.58. Under both of the plans, options may not, except under unusual circumstances, be exercised until one year following the grant date. 7. Leases Rental expenses for operating leases, net of sublease rentals, were $34,175,000 in 1999, $33,898,000 in 1998, and $29,920,000 in 1997. We have various operating leases with remaining terms of more than one year. These leases have minimum lease payment requirements, net of sublease rentals, of $25,457,000 for 2000, $18,054,000 for 2001, $11,230,000 for 2002, $8,403,000 for 2003, and $5,587,000 for 2004, with total payments thereafter of $21,326,000. Substantially all lease agreements have fixed payment terms based upon the lapse of time. Certain lease agreements provide us with the option to purchase the leased property. In addition, certain lease agreements contain renewal options exercisable by the Company ranging up to 15 years, with fixed payment terms similar to those in the original lease agreements. We also lease certain equipment and buildings under capital leases; aggregate obligations under capital leases were not material at December 31, 1999 and 1998. 8. Acquisitions In 1999, 1998, and 1997, we made various acquisitions, all of which were accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the purchase prices were allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair values. The initial purchase price allocations may be adjusted within one year of the date of purchase for changes in estimates of the fair values of assets and liabilities. Such adjustments are not expected to be significant to our results of operations or financial position. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired was recorded as goodwill and is being amortized over 40 years. The results of operations of the acquired businesses are included in operations subsequent to the dates of acquisitions. We acquired two businesses during 1999, six businesses during 1998, and eight businesses and entered into a joint venture during 1997. Amounts paid, acquisition liabilities recorded, debt assumed, and stock issued for these acquisitions were as follows: ($'s in thousands) 1999 1998 1997 ---- ---- ---- Cash paid $9,369 $27,282 $254,025 Acquisition liabilities recorded $7,237 $49,062 $ 12,674 Debt assumed $ - $ 162 $ 10,137 Stock issued shares - - 135,842 value $ - $ - $ 2,882 In January 1999, we acquired the office supply business of Wallace Computer Services, based in Lisle, Illinois. In September 1999, we acquired Supply West, based in Perth, Western Australia. The transactions were completed for cash of $9,369,000 and the recording of $361,000 of acquisition liabilities. The 1998 amounts include the acquisition of three contract stationer businesses, two direct marketing businesses, and one computer consumables business. These transactions were completed for cash of $19,897,000, debt assumed of $162,000, and the recording of $8,062,000 of acquisition liabilities. The 1997 amounts include the acquisition of 100% of the shares of Jean-Paul Guisset S.A. ("JPG"). JPG is a direct marketer of office products in France. The negotiated purchase price was approximately FF850,000,000, which translated to about US$144,000,000 at the time of purchase, plus a price supplement payable in April 2000 if certain earnings and sales growth targets are reached. The maximum amount of the price supplement is FF300,000,000, which translates to approximately US$46,000,000 at December 31, 1999. In 1998, we made a partial payment of the price supplement of FF27,000,000, which translated to approximately US$4,430,000 at the time of payment. In 1998, we also recorded a liability for the estimated remaining amount of the price supplement of FF229,000,000, which translated to about US$41,000,000 at December 31, 1998. The liability was based on the results of 1998 and 1997 and was included in "Other long-term liabilities" in the Balance Sheet. During 1999, we increased the liability for the price supplement by an additional FF44,000,000, which translated to about US$6,876,000. At December 31, 1999, we have a liability for the maximum remaining amount of the price supplement, FF273,000,000, which translates to approximately US$42,000,000. This amount is included in "Other accrued liabilities" in the Balance Sheet. Approximately FF128,500,000 (US$20,500,000) was repatriated to us from JPG during the third quarter of 1997. In 1997, in addition to the cash paid, we recorded approximately US$5,800,000 of acquisition liabilities and assumed US$10,137,000 of long-term debt. Also included in the 1997 amounts is the purchase of the promotional products business of OstermanAPI, Inc., based in Maumee, Ohio, for cash of $56,000,000 and the recording of $882,000 of liabilities. In conjunction with the acquisition of Osterman, we formed a majority-owned subsidiary, Boise Marketing Services, Inc. ("BMSI"), of which we own 88%. Our previously acquired promotional products company, OWNCO, also became part of BMSI. In January 1997, we formed a joint venture with Otto Versand ("Otto"), of which we owned 50%, to direct market office products in Europe, initially in Germany. In December 1997, Otto purchased a 10% interest in JPG for approximately FF72,200,000 (US$13,000,000). The sale of our interest to Otto was at book value. In December 1998, the Company and Otto dissolved the joint venture. Otto acquired our 50% interest in the joint venture. In addition, we repurchased Otto's 10% interest in JPG for $2,955,000 and repaid a loan and accrued interest to Otto of $13,700,000. We now own 100% of JPG. (see "Other operating (income) expense" in Note 1). Unaudited pro forma results of operations reflecting the acquisitions would have been as follows. If the 1999 acquisitions had occurred January 1, 1999, sales for the year ended December 31, 1999, would have increased to $3,388,000,000, net income would have decreased to $74,713,000, and diluted earnings per share would have remained $1.14. If the 1999 and 1998 acquisitions had occurred January 1, 1998, sales for the year ended December 31, 1998, would have increased to $3,161,000,000, net income would have increased to $53,088,000, and diluted earnings per share would have remained $.81. If the 1998 and 1997 acquisitions had occurred January 1, 1997, sales for the year ended December 31, 1997, would have increased to $2,814,000,000, net income would have decreased to $56,869,000, and diluted earnings per share would have remained $.89. This unaudited pro forma financial information does not necessarily represent the actual results of operations that would have occurred if the acquisitions had taken place on the dates assumed. As a result of our acquisition activity, we had short-term acquisition liabilities of $48,310,000, primarily for the JPG price supplement, and $5,710,000 at December 31, 1999 and 1998, which were included in "Other accrued liabilities." We had no long-term acquisition liabilities at December 31, 1999, and long-term acquisition liabilities of $51,621,000, primarily for the JPG price supplement, at December 31, 1998, which were included in "Other long-term liabilities." 9. Litigation and Legal Matters In December 1999, nine lawsuits were filed against the company, our directors, and Boise Cascade Corporation arising out of BCC's proposal to acquire our outstanding minority public shares. All nine cases were filed in New Castle County, Delaware. The lawsuits allege, among other things, that BCC's proposal was wrongful, unfair, and harmful to our public stockholders. On January 19, 2000, the court, upon stipulation of the parties, signed a consolidation order that combined the nine cases into one matter. We believe there are valid factual and legal defenses to these lawsuits and will vigorously defend all claims alleged by the plaintiffs. We are also involved in other litigation and administrative proceedings arising in the normal course of our business. In the opinion of management, our recovery, if any, or our liability, if any, under any pending litigation or administrative proceedings, including that described in the preceding paragraph, would not materially affect our financial condition or operations. 10. Segment Information In 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131 ("SFAS 131"), "Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information." This Statement establishes standards for the way that public business enterprises report information about operating segments in annual financial statements and requires that those enterprises report selected information about operating segments in interim financial reports issued to shareholders. We adopted this statement at December 31, 1998. The Statement defines operating segments as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available which is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker to assess performance and to decide how to allocate resources. Our chief operating decision maker is the group that consists of the Chief Executive Officer, Senior Vice Presidents of each of our operating segments, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Information Officer, Controller, and Vice Presidents of Logistics and Human Resources. This group of executives works together to allocate resources and assess the performance of the various business areas of the Company. Our senior vice presidents responsible for operations have broad responsibility for multiple operating segments. While we have multiple operating segments, SFAS 131 provides for aggregation of operating segments when they have similar economic characteristics and if they are similar in the areas of product/services, production processes, types of customers, distribution methods, and regulatory environment. Our businesses have historically had similar operating income, as a percent of net sales, which is the ultimate measure of performance used by our chief operating decision maker. Our businesses provide substantially similar products and services for the office. We do not manufacture products, but we procure products for sale to business customers. Our businesses procure products directly from similar manufacturers and wholesalers. The target customer group for our businesses is business customers. Our order fulfillment and distribution processes are essentially the same for our businesses. To the extent applicable, the regulatory environment is the same for our businesses. Because our operating segments are similar in the areas outlined in the Statement, we have aggregated our operating segments into one reportable segment. The following table summarizes our geographic information: (in thousands) United States Canada France Other(1) ------------- ------ -------- -------- 1999 Net sales $2,584,966 $382,670 $240,500 $173,589 Long-lived assets 453,612 99,668 167,510 55,017 1998 Net sales $2,371,639 $322,855 $220,102 $152,731 Long-lived assets 418,973 98,488 190,947 54,664 1997 Net sales $2,079,530 $298,587 $ 74,675 $143,940 Long-lived assets 378,425 93,771 142,618 54,577 (1) 1999 and 1998 amounts include operations in Australia, Belgium, Spain, and the United Kingdom. 1997 amounts include operations in Australia, Germany, and the United Kingdom. Revenues are attributed to geographic areas based on the location of the distribution centers producing the revenue. Export sales to foreign unaffiliated customers are immaterial. No single customer accounts for 10% or more of net sales. Our revenues from external customers by product category, expressed as a percentage of our total net sales, were: 1999 1998 1997 ---- ---- ---- Office supplies 54% 61% 66% Office paper 15% 13% 13% Office furniture 12% 12% 11% Computer supplies 16% 10% 7% Promotional products 3% 4% 3% 11. Quarterly Results of Operations (unaudited) 1999 4th Qtr. 3rd Qtr. 2nd Qtr. 1st Qtr. -------- -------- -------- -------- (in thousands, except share information) Net sales $893,256 $838,521 $801,559 $848,389 Cost of sales 663,685 630,516 588,420 629,261 -------- -------- -------- -------- Gross profit 229,571 208,005 213,139 219,128 -------- -------- -------- -------- Operating expenses 185,550 173,670 176,525 180,655 -------- -------- -------- -------- Income from operations 44,021 34,335 36,614 38,473 -------- -------- -------- -------- Interest expense 6,207 5,932 5,796 6,452 Other income, net 85 487 484 315 -------- -------- -------- -------- Income before income taxes 37,899 28,890 31,302 32,336 Income tax expense 16,193 12,507 13,024 13,846 -------- -------- -------- -------- Net income $ 21,706 $ 16,383 $ 18,278 $ 18,490 ======== ======== ======== ======== Earnings per share-basic and diluted $.33 $.25 $.28 $.28 Common stock prices (1) High $15 5/16 $ 12 1/2 $ 12 3/4 $ 15 3/8 Low $ 9 9/16 $ 9 5/8 $ 9 7/8 $ 10 3/4 1998 4th Qtr. 3rd Qtr. 2nd Qtr. 1st Qtr. -------- -------- -------- -------- (in thousands, except share information) Net sales $814,219 $760,437 $732,863 $759,808 Cost of sales 598,083 571,978 544,554 564,230 -------- -------- -------- -------- Gross profit 216,136 188,459 188,309 195,578 -------- -------- -------- -------- Operating expenses 189,671 160,701 158,074 159,542 -------- -------- -------- -------- Income from operations 26,465 27,758 30,235 36,036 -------- -------- -------- -------- Interest expense 6,011 6,553 6,885 6,465 Other income, net 30 422 211 668 -------- -------- -------- -------- Income before income taxes 20,484 21,627 23,561 30,239 Income tax expense 10,561 9,800 9,833 12,650 -------- -------- -------- -------- Net income $ 9,923 $ 11,827 $ 13,728 $ 17,589 ======== ======== ======== ======== Earnings per share-basic and diluted $.15 $.18 $.21 $.27 Common stock prices (1) High $13 7/16 $16 9/16 $ 20 1/2 $ 20 1/4 Low $ 8 9/16 $ 7 3/8 $ 15 1/2 $ 14 7/8 (1) Our common stock is traded principally on the New York Stock Exchange. F-6 Report of Management The management of Boise Cascade Office Products Corporation is primarily responsible for the information and representations contained in this annual report. The financial statements and related notes togetherwere prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles appropriate in the reportcircumstances. In preparing the financial statements, management has, when necessary, made judgments and estimates based on currently available information. Management maintains a comprehensive system of internal controls based on written policies and procedures and the careful selection and training of employees. The system is designed to provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss or unauthorized use and that transactions are executed in accordance with management's authorization. The concept of reasonable assurance is based on recognition that the cost of a particular accounting control should not exceed the benefit expected to be derived. The Internal Audit staff of Boise Cascade Corporation monitors the Company's financial reporting system and the related internal accounting controls, which are also selectively tested by Arthur Andersen LLP, Boise Cascade Office Products' independent public accountants, are presented in our 1997 Annual Report on pages 20-34for purposes of planning and are incorporated herein by reference.performing their audit of the Company's financial statements. The Audit Committee of the board of directors, which is composed solely of nonemployee directors, meets periodically with management, representatives of the Internal Audit Department, and Arthur Andersen LLP representatives to assure that each group is carrying out its responsibilities. The Internal Audit staff and the independent public accountants have access to the Audit Committee, without the presence of management, to discuss the results of their audits, recommendations concerning the system of internal accounting controls, and the quality of financial reporting. F-7 The unaudited income statementIncome Statement for the three months ended December 31, 1997, is1999, and Notes to Quarterly Financial Statements are presented in our Fact Book for the fourth quarter of 19971999 and isare incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE Not applicable. 18 19None. PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT Directors TheStructure Our board of directors, andcomprised of eight persons, is divided into three classes for purposes of election. One class is elected at each annual meeting of shareholders to serve for a three-year term. Two directors are nominees for reelection in 2000, each to hold office until the annual meeting of shareholders in 2003. Our other directors are not up for election this year and will continue in office for the remainder of their terms. Directors Nominated This Year for Terms Expiring in 2003 James G. Connelly III, 54, joined our board of directors in 1995. In 1999, he became a partner in Garrett Capital Advisors LLC, a private equity firm. Mr. Connelly served as the president and chief operating officer of USFreightways Corporation, a diversified transportation and logistics company, during 1998. He was the president and chief operating officer of Caremark International Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of MedPartners, Inc., and a national provider of health care management and services, from 1992 to 1997. Peter G. Danis Jr., 68, became a director in 1995. He was the president and chief executive officer of BCOP from 1995 to 1998. Mr. Danis served as an executive vice president of Boise Cascade Corporation from 1993 to 1998. He is also a director and the nonexecutive chairman of the board of Payless Cashways, Inc. Directors Whose Terms Expire in 2002 Theodore Crumley, 54, joined our board of directors in 1995. He is currently senior vice president and chief financial officer of Boise Cascade Corporation and has been an executive officer of Boise Cascade Corporation since 1990. Mr. Crumley is also a director of Hecla Mining Company. A. William Reynolds, 66, joined our board of directors in 1995. He is the chief executive of Old Mill Group, a private investment firm. Mr. Reynolds was the chairman of the board and chief executive officer of GenCorp Inc., a diversified manufacturing and service company, from 1987 to 1995. He is also a director of Boise Cascade Corporation and Eaton Corporation and former chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. Donald E. Roller, 62, joined our board of directors in 1998. He served as acting chief executive officer of Payless Cashways, Inc., a building materials and home improvement products retailer, during 1998. Mr. Roller was an executive vice president of USG Corporation, the world's largest manufacturer of gypsum panels, joint compound, and related construction products, during 1996. He served as the president and chief executive officer of United States Gypsum Company, are presented underUSG's largest business unit, from 1993 to 1996. Mr. Roller is also a director of Payless Cashways, Inc., and The Jacksonville Bank. Directors Whose Terms Expire in 2001 John B. Carley, 66, joined our board of directors in 1995. In January 1999, Mr. Carley retired as chairman of the caption "ElectionExecutive Committee of Directors"the board of directors (an officer position) of Albertson's, Inc., a retail food and drug company. He served as the president and chief operating officer of Albertson's, Inc., from 1990 to 1996. Mr. Carley is also a director of Albertson's, Inc., and Idaho Power Company. George J. Harad, 55, became a director and chairman of the board in our proxy statement. This information1995. He is incorporated herein by reference.
Executive Officers as of February 27, 1998: - ------------------------------------------ Date First Elected Name Age Position as an Officer - ---- --- -------- ------------ Peter G. Danis Jr. (1) 66 Chief Executive Officer and Director 4/1/95 Christopher C. Milliken (2) 52 President and Director 4/1/95 A. James Balkins III (3) 45 Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Corporate Secretary 4/1/95 Richard L. Black 52 Senior Vice President, The Reliable Corporation, Canada, and Europe 4/1/95 Carol B. Moerdyk (3) 47 Senior Vice President, U.S. Contract Operations 4/1/95 Lawrence E. Beesonchairman of the board and chief executive officer of Boise Cascade Corporation and has been an executive officer of Boise Cascade Corporation since 1982. Mr. Harad is also a director of FM Global and US West, Inc. Christopher C. Milliken, 54, became a director and president and chief executive officer of the company in 1998 after serving as senior vice president, operations, since 1995. He has been an executive officer of Boise Cascade Corporation since 1995, having previously served as the eastern region manager of its Office Products Division from 1990 to 1995. Mr. Milliken is also a director of Cabot Industrial Trust. Executive Officers as of February 29, 2000: Date First Elected Name Age Position as an Officer - ---- --- -------- ------------- Christopher C. Milliken (1) 54 President and Chief Executive Officer 4/1/95 A. James Balkins III (2) 47 Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer 4/1/95 Richard L. Black 54 Senior Vice President, Direct Marketing and Europe 4/1/95 Kenneth W. Cupp 53 Senior Vice President, U.S. Contract Operations 4/22/97 Carol B. Moerdyk (2) 49 Senior Vice President, U.S., Canadian, and Australian Contract Operations 4/1/95 Darrell R. Elfeldt 56 Vice President, Corporate Planning 4/1/95 David A. Goudge 52 Vice President, Marketing 4/22/97 William E. Gruber 54 Vice President, Marketing 4/1/95 Kenneth W. Cupp 51 Vice President and Region Manager 4/22/97 Darrell R. Elfeldt 54 Vice President and Controller 4/1/95 David A. Goudge 50 Vice President, Product Marketing 4/22/97 Larry L. Gunther 55 Vice President and Chief Information Officer 7/29/97 John A. Love 57 Vice President, Human Resources 4/1/95 Gary A. Massel 58 Vice President, Logistics 7/29/97 Michael F. Meehan 49 Vice President and Region Manager 4/22/97 Stephen M. Thompson 55 Vice President and Region Manager 4/1/95 Peter D. Vanexan 51 Vice President and Region Manager 4/21/98 Larry L. Gunther 57 Vice President and Chief Information Officer 7/29/97 Thomas J. Jaszka 38 Vice President and Controller 2/16/99 David Kelly 47 Vice President, Managing Director of Australian Operations 8/3/99 John A. Love 59 Vice President, Human Resources 4/1/95 Gary A. Massel 60 Vice President, Logistics 7/29/97 Michael F. Meehan 51 Vice President and Region Manager 4/22/97 Stephen M. Thompson 57 Vice President and Region Manager 4/1/95 Peter D. Vanexan 53 Vice President, BCOP and President, Grand & Toy 4/22/97
19 20Matthew R. Broad 40 Corporate Secretary 4/21/98 (1) ExecutiveSenior Vice President, Boise Cascade Corporation. (2) Senior Vice President, Boise Cascade Corporation. (3) Vice President, Boise Cascade Corporation. Peter G. Danis Jr. has served as Chief Executive Officer and President of Boise Cascade Office Products Corporation since 1995. In February 1998, Mr. Danis retired as President of the Company and announced his intention to retire as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, effective April 1998. Mr. Danis will continue to serve on the Company's Board of Directors. Prior to 1995, Mr. Danis served as Executive Vice President and General Manager, Office Products Distribution Division of Boise Cascade Corporation since 1993. Prior thereto, Mr. Danis served in various capacities at Boise Cascade Corporation including as Executive Vice President, Office Products and Building Products from 1989 to 1993; Senior Vice President from 1981 to 1989; and Vice President, Office Products from 1977 to 1981. Christopher C. Milliken was elected President of the Company in February 1998.1998 and assumed the role of Chief Executive Officer in April 1998 upon Pete Danis' retirement. Previously, Mr. Milliken served as Senior Vice President, Operations, of the Company since 1995. Prior to 1995, Mr. Milliken served as a Region Manager of Boise Cascade Office Products Distribution Division (the "Division") since 1991 and in various positions with the Division since 1977. A. James Balkins III was elected Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer in February 1998. Prior to 1998, Mr. Balkins served as Corporate Secretary of the Company since 1995 and Vice President, Corporate Planning and Development of Boise Cascade Corporation since 1996. Previously, Mr. Balkins served in various capacities at Boise Cascade Corporation since 1979 including Corporate Secretary from 1991 to 1997 and Associate General Counsel from 1984 to 1996. Richard L. Black was elected Senior Vice President, The Reliable Corporation, Canada,Direct Marketing and Europe, in February 1998. Mr. Black has served as President of The Reliable Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, since 1994. Prior to 1994, Mr. Black served as Vice President, Marketing of Rivertown Trading Company from 1992 to 1994 and, prior thereto, as Vice President, New Business Development of Fingerhut Corporation, both direct marketing companies. Carol B. Moerdyk was electedKenneth W. Cupp has served as Senior Vice President, U.S. Contract Operations, since January 2000. Previously, Mr. Cupp served as Senior Vice President and Region Manager since 1998. Prior to 1998, Mr. Cupp has served as Vice President and Region Manager since 1997, Region Manager of Boise Cascade Office Products Corporation since 1995, and in various positions with the Company in FebruaryDivision since 1967. Carol B. Moerdyk has served as Senior Vice President, U.S., Canadian, and Australian Contract Operations since January 2000. Previously, Ms. Moerdyk served as Senior Vice President, North American and Australian Contract Operations, since 1998. Previously,Prior to 1998, Ms. Moerdyk served as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer of the Company since 1995. Prior to 1995,Previously, Ms. Moerdyk served as Vice President and Assistant to the General Manager of Office Products of Boise Cascade Corporation since 1992 and in various capacities at Boise Cascade Corporation since 1981 including Vice President, Corporate Planning and Development from 1990 to 1992 and Corporate Planning and Development Director from 1986 to 1990. Lawrence E. BeesonDarrell R. Elfeldt has served as Vice President, Marketing of Hallmark Cards, Inc. from 1990 to March 1995 andCorporate Planning since 1998. Previously, Mr. Elfeldt served as Senior Vice President Marketing for KFC Corp., a subsidiary of Pepsico Inc., prior thereto.and Controller since 1995. Prior to being elected an officer of the Company, Kenneth W. Cupp served as a Region Manager of Boise Cascade Office Products Corporation since 1995. 20 21 Prior to being elected an officer of the Company, Darrell R.1995, Mr. Elfeldt served as Finance and Distribution Director of Boise Cascade Office Products Distribution Division since 1993. He has served1993 and in various positions with the divisionDivision since 1980.1980 and with Boise Cascade Corporation since 1970. Prior to being elected an officer of the Company, David A. Goudge served as the Director of Product Marketing of Boise Cascade Office Products Distribution Division since 1993. Prior to 1993, Mr. Goudge has served in various positions with the Division since 1980. Prior to being elected an officer of the Company, William E. Gruber served as a Region Manager of Boise Cascade Office Products since 1996. Prior to 1996, Mr. Gruber has served in various positions with the Division since 1970. Larry L. Gunther has served as the Chief Information Officer of Boise Cascade Office Products Corporation since June 1997. In March 2000, Mr. Gunther resigned as Chief Information Officer and as an employee of BCOP. Previously, Mr. Gunther served as Chief Information Officer of the North Atlantic Group of Gillette for five years and as Chief Information Officer of the Consumer Products Group of Bristol-MyersBristol- Myers Squibb for 11 years. Thomas J. Jaszka was elected Vice President and Controller in February 1999. Prior to being elected an officer of the Company, Mr. Jaszka served as Director of Accounting since 1998. Previously, Mr. Jaszka has served in various positions with the Division since 1986. David Kelly was elected Vice President, Managing Director of Australian Operations, in August 1999. Prior to being elected an officer of the Company, Mr. Kelly served as Managing Director of BCOP Australia since 1996. Prior to being elected an officer of the Company, John A. Love served as the Human Resources Director of Boise Cascade Office Products Distribution Division since 1978. Previously, Mr. Love served as Human Resource Manager for the Division since 1974. Gary A. Massel served as Vice President, Logistics since 1997. In March 2000, Mr. Massel became Chief Information Officer. Prior to being elected an officer of the Company, Gary A.Mr. Massel served as the Director of Logistics of Boise Cascade Office Products Corporation since 1995. Prior to being elected an officer of the Company, Michael A. Meehan served as a Region Manager of Boise Cascade Office Products Corporation since 1995. Previously, Mr. Meehan has served in various positions with the Division since 1978. Prior to being elected an officer of the Company, Stephen M. Thompson served as a Region Manager of Boise Cascade Office Products Distribution Division since 1976. Previously, Mr. Thompson served in various positions with the Division in various capacities since 1970. Prior to being elected an officer of the Company, Peter D. Vanexan served as the Managing Director of Grand & Toy since 1991. Prior to 1991, Mr. Vanexan served as President of Innova Envelope since 1986. Matthew R. Broad was elected Corporate Secretary in April 1998. Prior to 1998, Mr. Broad has served as counsel for the Company since 1989 and in the legal department of Boise Cascade Corporation since 1984. Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors and executive officers, and any person who owns more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file reports of holdings and transactions in Boise Cascade Office Products shares with the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange. Based on our records and other information, we believe that in 1999 our directors and executive officers met all applicable SEC filing requirements, except for Mr. Danis. Mr. Danis filed an amended Form 5 for 1998 on February 10, 2000, reporting a stock option grant received in February 1998 while he was our chief executive officer. This grant should have been reported on his Form 5 filed with the SEC on February 1, 1999. ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Director Compensation Of our current board members, only Mr. Milliken is a salaried employee of Boise Cascade Office Products Corporation since 1996. ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Information concerningProducts. Board members that are not salaried employees or BCC officers receive separate compensation for board service. In 1999, that compensation included: Annual Retainer: $21,000 Attendance Fees: $1,000 for each board meeting $1,000 for each committee meeting held on a day other than the board meeting date Expenses related to attendance Stock Options: 5,000 annually During 1999, the members of the Committee of Independent Directors also received a special retainer of $20,000 plus a $1,000 fee for each committee meeting related to BCC's proposal to purchase our outstanding shares not owned by BCC. Our directors receive no additional compensation for attending other committee meetings held on the same day as a board meeting. Director Stock Option Plan Through our shareholder-approved Director Stock Option Plan, each director who is not an employee of either the company or BCC receives an annual stock option grant on July 31. Directors appointed between August 1 and December 31 receive a grant when they join our board. The options are exercisable one year after the grant date, and they expire the earlier of (a) three years after the director's retirement, resignation, death, or termination as a director or (b) ten years after the grant date. In 1999, each nonemployee director was granted an option to purchase 5,000 shares of our common stock at a price equal to the stock's closing market price on the grant date. Director Deferred Compensation Program Our directors' deferred compensation program allows each nonemployee director to defer all or a portion of his cash compensation. Under this program, nonemployee directors may defer from a minimum of $5,000 to a maximum of 100% of their cash compensation in a calendar year. Interest is imputed on deferred compensation at a rate equal to 130% of Moody's Composite Average of Yields on Corporate Bonds. A minimum death benefit of 1.5 times a participant's total deferral amount between February 14, 1995, and December 31, 1995, is also provided. The benefits under this program are not funded and are payable from our general assets. Participants in the program are unsecured general creditors of the company with respect to these benefits. As of December 31, 1999, four directors were participating in the deferred compensation program. Other During 1995, the company entered into a number of ongoing transactions with BCC which are described under Part III, Item 13, "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions." None of the transactions constitutes compensation for Messrs. Crumley, Harad, or Reynolds. Compensation Committee Report The Compensation Committee of the board of directors approves the individual salaries and compensation programs for executive officers. The following report explains the basis for the committee's compensation decisions during 1999. The company's salary policy provides for compensation at competitive levels for all employees. Our executive compensation program is designed to: . attract, motivate, reward, and retain the broad-based management talent critical to achieving the company's business goals; . link a portion of each executive officer's compensation to the performance of both the company and the individual executive officer; and . encourage ownership of company common stock by executive officers. To ensure that compensation levels remain competitive, the company reviews various reports and other information on the executive compensation practices of 15 other companies within office products and general distribution industries. These companies are selected primarily because comparable levels of responsibility can be identified for executives within those companies. Of these, one is included in the industry comparables index shown in the performance graph following this report. The company also collects information on the compensation practices of 74 other distribution and retail companies. Together, these office products distribution, general distribution, and retail companies are referred to as "peer group" companies in this report. In addition to the peer group companies' compensation information, the company and committee use information regarding executive compensation programs provided by human resource consulting firms, including in 1999, Hewitt Associates, Management Compensation Group, and Stern Stewart & Co. The company's executive compensation program has four principal components: . base salary; . annual variable incentive compensation; . stock options; and . other compensation plans. During 1999, the cash-based annual variable (at-risk) incentive component linked executive compensation directly to the company's financial performance, and the stock option component tied executive compensation to growth in its stock value. The company's compensation plans reflect the committee's intent that the compensation paid to executive officers will qualify for federal income tax deduction by the company. Executive compensation decisions, however, necessarily involve some subjective judgment. The committee reserves the authority to make compensation payments that may not be deductible under federal tax law. Base Salary A salary guideline is established for each salaried position in the company, including each executive officer position. The midpoint of each salary guideline approximates the average salary, adjusted for company size (in sales), of equivalent positions at the peer group companies. Annual base salary is designed to compensate executives for their level of responsibility, sustained individual performance, and performance of the business or staff unit which the executive heads. Business or staff unit performance is measured by economic value added, return on total capital, achievement of sales or operating targets, effectiveness of cost-containment measures, implementation of Total Quality process improvements, and other factors relevant to the specific position. In weighing these factors, the committee must make inherently subjective judgments. Each year, the committee reviews the criteria discussed above and establishes the chief executive officer's base salary. Mr. Milliken's salary reflects his 22 years of combined experience with the company and BCC, his responsibilities as chief executive officer, and his role in the company's strategic growth, cost-effectiveness programs, and Total Quality evolution. In 1999, the committee set Mr. Milliken's base salary at $450,000 per year. This salary rate was approximately 14.7% below the midpoint of the designated salary guideline ($527,800) for the company's chief executive officer. Annual Variable Incentive Compensation The committee establishes objective performance criteria for the variable incentive compensation program and oversees the program's administration. This program applies to a majority of the company's salaried and hourly employees. The criteria for the program specify percentages of the participants' compensation to be paid as additional cash compensation based on improvements in the company's "economic value added." Economic value added is determined by calculating the company's operating profit and then subtracting a pretax charge for the capital used to generate that profit. The committee establishes target payouts for each participating position. The target payout for the chief executive officer, over time, should average approximately 60% of the chief executive officer's base salary, assuming the company performs satisfactorily. The actual payout under the plan varies from year to year depending on the company's financial performance for the year. Target payout amounts for executive officers also vary, depending on their levels of responsibility and on competitive compensation practices. Based on our 1999 review of competitive compensation data covering the peer group companies, the committee determined that certain of the target payouts under the company's annual variable incentive compensation program required adjustment, beginning with the 1999 plan year. The committee awarded a special discretionary incentive payment to executive officers to reflect this adjustment. Under the 1999 program, Mr. Milliken received a payment equal to 52.5% of his base salary, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table. The Summary Compensation Table reflects amounts paid under this variable incentive program. Stock Options The purpose of the stock option plan is to further align management's interests with the company's long-term performance and, therefore, the long-term interests of the shareholders. The committee administers this plan and grants stock options to executive officers and other key managers. The exercise price of all grants represents the fair market value of the common stock when granted. The committee determines the number of stock options to grant by: . analyzing peer group companies' competitive compensation; . considering consultants' recommendations; and . taking each individual's salary guideline and responsibilities into account. The committee may also consider the number and exercise price of options granted to an individual in the past. Corporate or business unit measures are not used to determine the size of individual option grants. The stock option plan limits the number of shares issued to any individual over the life of the plan to 20% of the total number of shares authorized by shareholders for issuance under the plan. This provision reflects the committee's view that the plan is intended to provide long-term incentive compensation to a relatively broad spectrum of the company's management. In 1999, Mr. Milliken received a grant of an option to purchase 118,000 shares of the company's common stock. In determining the number of shares to include in Mr. Milliken's grant, the committee considered: . information about stock option grants to chief executive officers of the peer group companies and a representative group of distribution and other operating companies; . the company's financial performance; . the number of shares granted to other chief executive officers and the value of those options; . the size of grants offered to the company's other executive officers; and . the number and exercise price of shares previously granted to Mr. Milliken. Other Compensation Plans The company's executive officers are entitled to receive additional compensation in the form of payments, allocations, or accruals under various other compensation and benefit plans. The plans are described more fully in the footnotes to the Summary Compensation Table and under "Other Benefit Plans" in this section. Each of these plans is an integral part of the company's compensation program. Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors Donald E. Roller, Chairman John B. Carley James G. Connelly III A. William Reynolds Performance Graph The following graph compares the five-year cumulative total return beginning April 7, 1995 (the date that our common stock began trading on the New York Stock Exchange), through December 31, 1999, for the company, the Standard & Poor's 500 index, and a selected group of office products companies. The selected companies include Office Depot, OfficeMax, Staples, and U.S. Office Products Company. The graph plots the growth in value of an initial $100 investment over the indicated time period, assuming the reinvestment of dividends, if any. [Performance Graph Appears Here] Base Period Return Return Return Return Return Company\Index Name 4/7/95 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 - ------------------ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Boise Cascade Office Products Corp. $100 $171.00 $166.00 $119.50 $108.00 $120.00 Industry Comparables Index* 100 107.07 102.63 135.15 195.13 116.19 S&P 500 Index 100 123.79 152.21 202.99 261.00 315.93 *Industry Comparables Index includes Office Depot, OfficeMax, Staples, and U.S. Office Products Company. Compensation Tables - ------------------- The following tables present compensation information for our chief executive officer and the four next most highly compensated executive officers during 1999. This table sets forth compensation earned during each of the last three years. Summary Compensation Table
Long-Term Compensation Annual Compensation Awards ----------------------------------------------- ------------- Securities All Other Underlying Other Annual Options/ Compen- Name and Salary ($) Bonus ($) Compensation ($) SARs (#) sation ($) Principal Position Year (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) - ------------------ ---- -------- -------- ---------------- ------- ------- Christopher C. Milliken, 1999 $435,000 $236,295 $ -- 118,000 $32,997 President and Chief 1998 371,250 202,722 -- 90,000 26,050 Executive Officer (1) 1997 233,757 87,840 -- 28,000 22,042 Carol B. Moerdyk, 1999 267,528 109,606 -- 42,000 33,735 Senior Vice President, 1998 252,507 99,818 -- 39,000 27,363 North American and 1997 223,002 83,448 -- 28,000 27,217 Australian Contract Operations (1) Richard L. Black, 1999 263,694 107,541 -- 42,000 21,161 Senior Vice President, 1998 252,507 99,818 -- 39,000 16,751 Direct Marketing and 1997 223,002 78,134 -- 28,000 16,356 Europe A. James Balkins III, 1999 223,755 92,899 -- 42,000 29,677 Senior Vice President, 1998 202,061 81,543 54,068 39,000 25,412 Chief Financial Officer, 1997 175,104 72,331 -- 0 23,946 and Treasurer (1) Kenneth W. Cupp, 1999 225,000 72,698 52,448 34,000 12,834 Senior Vice President, 1998 175,959 73,097 -- 12,500 8,429 U.S. Contract Operations 1997 152,517 39,661 -- 8,100 8,275
(1) Mr. Milliken is also a senior vice president and Mr. Balkins and Ms. Moerdyk are also vice presidents of BCC. (2) Includes amounts deferred under the SSRP, Key Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, and 1995 Executive Officer Deferred Compensation Plan. Mr. Balkins joined the company on February 10, 1998. His compensation figures include amounts earned by him during the period from 1997 through February 9, 1998, when he was employed by BCC. (3) Payments, if any, under the company's variable incentive compensation program. See "Annual Variable Incentive Compensation" in this section. See footnote (2) for a discussion of Mr. Balkins' compensation. (4) For 1998, the aggregate cost to the company of providing perquisites received by Mr. Balkins is reported and includes $50,567 for a moving expense reimbursement. For 1999, the aggregate cost to the company of providing perquisites received by Mr. Cupp is reported and includes $48,296 for a moving expense reimbursement. If any federal income taxes were incurred by the executive and paid by the company relating to various executive officer benefits, the amounts would be shown in this column. The cost incurred by the company during these years for various other perquisites provided to each of the named executive officers, except for Mr. Balkins in 1998 and Mr. Cupp in 1999, is not included in this column because the amount did not exceed the lesser of $50,000 or 10% of the executive's compensation during each year. (5) Grants under the company's Key Executive Stock Option Plan. During 1997, Mr. Balkins was not granted options to purchase shares of Boise Cascade Office Products' common stock. He was, however, granted options by the Executive Compensation Committee of the Boise Cascade Corporation board of directors to purchase 8,800 shares of BCC's common stock under its Key Executive Stock Option Plan. (6) Amounts disclosed in this column include the following:
Accruals Company of Above- Allocations Company- Matching Market to Paid Contributions Interest on Boise Cascade Portion to the Deferred Corporation of Executive Deferred Compensation Employee Officer Life Compensation or Plans Stock Ownership Insurance Name Year SSRP Plans ($)(*) Balances ($) Plan ($) Programs ($) - ---- ---- ---------------- ------------ --------------- ------------ Christopher C. Milliken 1999 $18,961 $10,588 $ 0 $3,448 1998 13,773 8,072 0 4,205 1997 12,993 6,356 0 2,693 Carol B. Moerdyk 1999 11,020 16,441 0 6,274 1998 10,079 11,031 0 6,253 1997 12,475 7,156 0 7,586 Richard L. Black 1999 10,905 9,404 0 852 1998 9,919 5,701 0 1,131 1997 11,832 3,537 0 987 A. James Balkins III 1999 9,165 13,788 0 6,724 1998 9,366 9,282 0 6,764 1997 8,082 6,119 1,674 8,071 Kenneth W. Cupp 1999 8,943 3,145 0 746 1998 6,001 1,794 0 634 1997 6,756 953 0 566
(*) The company's 1995 Executive Officer Deferred Compensation Plan is an unfunded plan. Executive officers may irrevocably elect to defer receipt of a portion (6% to 20%) of their base salary until termination of employment or beyond. Amounts so deferred are generally credited with imputed interest at a rate equal to 130% of Moody's Composite Average of Yields on Corporate Bonds. The SSRP is a profit-sharing plan qualified under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code which contains a cash or deferred arrangement meeting the requirements of Section 401(k) of the Code. Stock Option Tables This table details the 1999 option grants under our Key Executive Stock Option Plan ("KESOP") to the five executives named in the Summary Compensation Table, as well as to all executive officers as a group and nonofficer employees as a group. Option/SAR Grants In 1999
Grant Individual Grants Date Value ---------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Number of Securities Percent of Underlying Total Options/ Exercise Grant Date Options/SARs SARs Granted to or Base Present Granted Employees in Price Expiration Value (2) Name (#) Fiscal Year ($/Sh) (1) Date ($) - ---- ------------ --------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Christopher C. Milliken 118,000 11.44% $12.8125 2/17/09 $ 540,440 Carol B. Moerdyk 42,000 4.07 12.8125 2/17/09 192,360 Richard L. Black 42,000 4.07 12.8125 2/17/09 192,360 A. James Balkins III 42,000 4.07 12.8125 2/17/09 192,360 Kenneth W. Cupp 34,000 3.30 12.8125 2/17/09 155,720 Executive officers as a group 469,000 45.48 12.8125 2/17/09 2,148,020 Nonofficer employees as a group 562,300 54.52 12.8125 2/17/09 2,575,334
(1) Under the KESOP, the exercise price must be the fair market value at the date of grant. Options granted under this plan during 1999 were fully vested when granted. However, except under limited circumstances, the options are exercisable only as follows: one-third of each option is exercisable after one year from the grant date, two-thirds of each option is exercisable after two years from the grant date, and the entire option is exercisable after three years from the grant date. Under the plan, no options may be granted after February 20, 2005. The expiration dates are 10 years after the grant date of each option grant. (2) "Grant Date Value" has been calculated using the Black-Scholes model of option valuation, with assumptions of: (a) risk-free interest rate of 5.05%, (b) expected stock price volatility of 35%, (c) expected option term of 4.2 years, and (d) no dividends. Based on this model, the calculated value of the options on February 16, 1999 (grant date), is $4.58 per share granted. This value does not necessarily represent the amount an option holder may ultimately realize upon exercise of an option. The following table sets forth the shares acquired and gross value (without adjustment for personal income taxes and fees, if any) realized by the top five executives when they exercised their stock options during 1999 and also states the year-end gross value of unexercised stock options held by these executives. Aggregate Option/SAR Exercises For 1999 and 1999 Option/SAR Values
Number of Securities Value of Underlying Unexercised Unexercised In-the-Money Options/SARs at Options/SARs 12/31/99 (#) at 12/31/99 ($) Shares Acquired Value Exercisable/ Exercisable/ Name Upon Exercise Realized (1) Unexercisable Unexercisable (2) - ------------------------- --------------- ------------ --------------- ---------------- Christopher C. Milliken 0 $0 109,067/187,333 $ 71,000/258,125 Carol B. Moerdyk 0 0 106,067/ 77,333 107,250/ 94,375 Richard L. Black 0 0 97,467/ 77,333 85,750/ 94,375 A. James Balkins III 0 0 13,000/ 68,000 1,250/ 94,375 Kenneth W. Cupp 0 0 25,517/ 45,033 21,979/ 75,583
(1) The "value realized" represents the difference between the option's exercise price and the value of the company's common stock at the time of exercise. (2) This column indicates the aggregate amount, if any, by which the common stock share price on December 31, 1999, $15.00, exceeded the options' exercise price. Other Benefit Plans Pension Plan We are a participating employer in the Boise Cascade Corporation Pension Plan for Salaried Employees. The estimated annual benefits payable upon retirement at age 65 under this plan for specified levels of average remuneration and years-of-service classifications are set out in the following table. Pension Plan Table - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Years of Service ------------------------------------------------------------------- Remuneration 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- $175,000 $10,938 $ 21,875 $ 32,813 $ 43,750 $ 54,688 $ 65,625 $ 76,563 200,000 12,500 25,000 37,500 50,000 62,500 75,000 87,500 250,000 15,625 31,250 46,875 62,500 78,125 93,750 109,375 300,000 18,750 37,500 56,250 75,000 93,750 112,500 131,250 400,000 25,000 50,000 75,000 100,000 125,000 150,000 175,000 500,000 31,250 62,500 93,750 125,000 156,250 187,500 218,750 600,000 37,500 75,000 112,500 150,000 187,500 225,000 262,500 700,000 43,750 87,500 131,250 175,000 218,750 262,500 306,250 800,000 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The pension plan entitles each vested employee, including executive officers, to receive a pension benefit at normal retirement equal to 1 1/4% of the highest average of any five consecutive years of compensation (as defined in the plan) out of the last ten years of employment, multiplied by the employee's years of service. Under the plan, "compensation" is the employee's base salary plus any amounts earned under the company's variable incentive compensation program (only "Salary" and "Bonus" from the Summary Compensation Table). As of December 31, 1999, the highest average of annual compensation during any five consecutive years for 1990 through 1999 and the years of service for the named executives are as follows: Name Compensation Years of Service ---- ------------ ---------------- Christopher C. Milliken $422,224 22 Carol B. Moerdyk 342,253 19 Richard L. Black 336,934 6 A. James Balkins III 254,802 21 Kenneth W. Cupp 224,389 31 As shown in the Pension Plan Table above, benefits are computed on a straight- life annuity basis and are not offset by social security or other retirement- type benefits. An employee is 100% vested in his or her pension benefit after five years of service, except for certain breaks in service. If an employee is entitled to a greater benefit under the plan's formula than the Internal Revenue Code allows for tax-qualified plans, the excess benefits will be paid from the company's general assets under the unfunded Supplemental Pension Plan. The benefit under the qualified pension plan is reduced by compensation deferred under any nonqualified deferred compensation plan. The Supplemental Pension Plan will also provide payments to the extent that participation in these deferred compensation plans has the effect of reducing an individual's pension benefit under the qualified plan. In the event of a change in control (as defined in the plan) of BCC, the plan restricts the ability of the plan sponsor or its successor to recoup surplus plan assets, if any exist. In general, after a change in control, the participants and beneficiaries will receive the plan's surplus assets, if any, on a pro rata basis if the plan is terminated, merged or consolidated with another plan, or the assets are transferred to another plan. After a change in control, a majority (in both number and interest) of plan participants and beneficiaries must consent to amend this provision. Early Retirement Plan The Early Retirement Plan applies to: . executive officers 55 years old or older who are also executive officers of BCC; . who have ten or more years of service; . who have served as an executive officer for at least five full years; and . who retire before age 65. Eligible officers receive an early retirement benefit prior to age 65 equal to the benefit calculated under the Pension Plan for Salaried Employees without reduction due to the officer's early retirement. Messrs. Milliken and Balkins and Ms. Moerdyk participate in this plan. Executive Officer Agreements We have entered into agreements with Messrs. Milliken and Balkins and Ms. Moerdyk who are also executive officers (but not employees) of BCC. These agreements formalize their severance benefits if any of those persons' employment is terminated after a change in control (as defined in the agreements) of BCC. The agreements provide certain severance benefits and protect other benefits that the named officers have already earned or reasonably expect to receive under our employee benefit plans. The officer will receive the benefits provided under the agreement if, after a change in control of BCC, the officer's employment is terminated other than for cause or disability (as defined in the agreement) or if the officer terminates employment after actions, specified in the agreement, which adversely affect the officer are taken. Under the agreement, the officer must remain employed with us for six months following the first potential change in control of BCC. These agreements help ensure that we will have the benefit of these officers' services without distraction in the face of a potential change in control of our majority shareholder. The board of directors believes that the agreements are in the best interests of our shareholders and the company. BCC has entered into similar agreements with all its executive officers. The benefits under the agreements include: . the officer's salary through the termination date; . severance pay equal to three times the officer's annual base salary and target incentive pay, less any severance pay that the officer receives under the Severance Pay Policy for Executive Officers, which is currently the amount of the officer's annual base salary; . vacation pay according to our Paid Time Off Policy; . any earned but unpaid bonus under the Key Executive Performance Plan (or any substitute plan) for the year endedpreceding termination; . an award under the Key Executive Performance Plan (or any substitute plan) equal to the greater of: (a) the officer's target award prorated through the month in which the officer is terminated; or (b) the actual award through the end of the month prior to termination based upon the award criteria for the applicable plan, prorated through the month in which the officer is terminated; . accelerated exercisability of the officer's stock options; . benefits under the Supplemental Early Retirement Plan; and . certain additional retirement and other employee benefits. The agreements provide four additional benefits. First, we will maintain for up to one year all employee benefit plans and programs in which the officer was entitled to participate immediately prior to termination or we will substitute similar arrangements. Second, we will maintain our participation in the Split- Dollar Life Insurance Plan until the officer's insurance policy under that plan is fully paid. Third, we will pay legal fees and expenses which the officer incurs to enforce his or her rights or benefits under the agreement. Fourth, we will increase the officer's total payments under the agreement to cover any excise taxes imposed by the Internal Revenue Service as a result of such payments. The estimated amount of payments and other benefits (not including legal fees, if any) each named executive officer would receive under the agreement based on 1999 compensation figures (in excess of the benefits to which the officer is entitled without the agreement) is: . Christopher C. Milliken $3,313,484 . Carol B. Moerdyk 1,740,925 . A. James Balkins III 1,436,722 (Payments which would be made subsequent to the termination date have been discounted as of December 31, 1997, is presented1999, at a rate of 7.12%, according to the requirements of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code.) Actual payments made under the caption "Compensation Tables"agreements at any future date would vary, depending in part upon what the executive has accrued under the variable compensation plans and benefit plans. Each agreement is effective until December 31, 2002. The agreements are automatically extended each January 1 for a new three-year period, unless we notify the officers by September 30 of the preceding year that we do not wish to extend the agreements. Deferred Compensation and Benefits Trust The company has established a deferred compensation and benefits trust. This trust is intended to ensure that participants and beneficiaries under several of our proxy statement. This informationnonqualified and unfunded deferred compensation plans and the executive officer agreements will receive the benefits they have earned in the event of a change in control of BCC (as defined in the plans and the agreements). The trust will not increase the benefits to which any individual participant is incorporated by reference.entitled under the covered plans and agreements. If a potential change in control occurs, the trust will be revocably funded. If an actual change in control occurs, the trust will be irrevocably funded and will pay benefits to participants in accordance with the plans and agreements. The trustee will receive fees and expenses either from us or from the trust assets. If the company become bankrupt or insolvent, the trust assets will be accessible to the claims of the company's creditors. Indemnification To the extent that Delaware law permits, we will indemnify our directors and officers against liabilities they incur in connection with actual or threatened proceedings to which they are or may become parties and which arise from their status as directors and officers. We insure, within stated limits, the directors and officers against these liabilities. The aggregate premium on the insurance policies for 1999 was $64,272. ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT (a) Information concerning the security ownership of certain beneficial owners asStock Ownership Majority Shareholder As of December 31, 1997, is set forth under the caption "Beneficial Ownership"1999, BCC, a Delaware corporation headquartered in Boise, Idaho, beneficially owned an aggregate of 53,398,724 shares, or 81.1%, of our proxy statementoutstanding common stock. BCC has sole voting and is incorporatedinvestment power over all of these shares. Because of their relationship with BCC, Messrs. Crumley, Harad, and Reynolds may be deemed by reference. (b) Information concerning security ownership of management as of December 31, 1997, is set forth under the caption "Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers" in our proxy statement and is incorporated by reference. (c) Information concerning compliance with Section 16 of the Securities and Exchange ActCommission to beneficially own the shares of 1934 is set forthour common stock owned by BCC. Each of these three people disclaims any beneficial ownership of those shares. Directors and Executive Officers The directors, nominees for director, and executive officers furnished the following information to us regarding the shares of our common stock which they beneficially owned on December 31, 1999. Ownership of Boise Cascade Office Products Corporation Stock - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Amount and Nature of Percent Name of Beneficial Owner Beneficial Ownership of Class - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Directors (1) - ------------- John B. Carley............................. 47,000 * James G. Connelly III...................... 26,000 * Theodore Crumley........................... 1,000 * Peter G. Danis Jr.......................... 324,800 * George J. Harad............................ 2,000 * Christopher C. Milliken.................... 318,639(2) * A. William Reynolds........................ 43,000 * Donald E. Roller........................... 11,000 * Other Named Executives - ---------------------- Carol B. Moerdyk........................... 192,689(2) * Richard L. Black........................... 176,294(2) * A. James Balkins III....................... 91,254(2) * Kenneth W. Cupp............................ 75,522(2) * All directors, nominees for director, and executive officers as a group (1)(2)..... 1,882,336 2.73% *Less than 1% of class - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) Beneficial ownership for the directors includes all shares held of record or in street name, plus options granted but unexercised under the caption "Section 16(a)Director Stock Option Plan ("DSOP"), described under "Director Compensation" in Part III, Item 11. The number of shares subject to options under the DSOP included in the beneficial ownership table is as follows: Messrs. Carley, 23,000 shares; Connelly, 23,000 shares; Danis, 10,000 shares; Reynolds, 23,000 shares; Roller, 10,000 shares; and directors as a group, 89,000 shares. (2) The beneficial ownership for these executive officers includes all shares held of record or in street name, plus options granted but unexercised under the Key Executive Stock Option Plan ("KESOP"), described under "Stock Option Tables" in Part III, Item 11, and interests in shares of common stock held in the Boise Cascade Office Products Common Stock Fund by the trustee of the Savings and Supplemental Retirement Plan ("SSRP"), a defined contribution plan qualified under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. The following table indicates the nature of each executive's stock ownership. Common Unexercised SSRP Shares Option (Common Owned Shares Stock) ------ ----------- ------- Christopher C. Milliken 8,400 296,400 13,839 Carol B. Moerdyk 5,000 183,400 4,289 Richard L. Black 1,494 174,800 0 A. James Balkins III 200 81,000 10,054 Kenneth W. Cupp 1,660 70,550 3,312 All executive officers as a group 25,759 1,362,050 39,727 On December 31, 1999, the following directors, nominees for director, and executive officers beneficially owned or held options for the following number of shares of BCC's common and preferred stock. Ownership of Boise Cascade Corporation Stock
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Common Unexercised Deferred SSRP Shares ESOP Shares Option Stock (Common Common (Preferred Name of Beneficial Owner Owned Shares Units Stock) Stock (1) Stock) (2) - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Directors - --------- Theodore Crumley 1,247 189,300 1,547 19,369 211,463 616 George J. Harad 3,511 743,500 8,719 7,972 763,702 863 Christopher C. Milliken 0 0 0 0 0 974 A. William Reynolds 10,000 16,864 0 0 26,864 0 Other Named Executives - ---------------------- Carol B. Moerdyk 0 42,700 0 43 42,743 285 A. James Balkins III 65 31,200 0 0 31,265 483 Kenneth W. Cupp 0 0 0 14 14 856 All directors, nominees for director, and executive officers as a group 17,173 1,208,424 13,055 30,128 1,268,780 13,178 - -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Mr. Harad beneficially owns about 1.24% of BCC's common stock. All of our executive officers, directors, or nominees for director (as a group) beneficially own 2.05% of BCC's common stock. (2) Our executive officers (individually or as a group) do not own more than 1% of BCC's Series D preferred stock (ESOP). Ownership of More than 5% of Boise Cascade Office Products Stock As of December 31, 1999, the table below describes each person or entity that we know to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of our voting securities. - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Voting Dispositive Authority Authority Total Amount Percent ----------------- ----------------- of Beneficial of Name and Address Sole Shared Sole Shared Ownership Reporting Compliance" in our proxy statement and is incorporated by reference. 21 22Class - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Common Stock, $.01 Par Value - ---------------------------- Boise Cascade Corporation 53,398,724 0 53,398,724 0 53,398,724 81.1% 1111 W. Jefferson Street P.O. Box 50 Boise, ID 83728 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS InformationAs of December 31, 1999, BCC owned 81.1% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. We supply office products to BCC and purchase certain paper and paper products from them. During the year ended December 31, 1999, our sales to BCC were $2,021,000 and our purchases from them were $306,072,000. We anticipate that our sales and purchases with BCC during 2000 will exceed those in 1999. In December 1999, BCC announced a proposal to acquire our outstanding public shares. On March 12, 2000, BCC and BCOP entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger in which BCC would purchase all of BCOP's publicly held shares for $16.50 in cash. In accordance with that Agreement, BCC commenced a tender offer for our minority public shares on March 22, 2000. The offer will expire on April 19, 2000, unless it is extended. If BCC is successful in obtaining a majority of the minority shares, it will purchase the remaining shares through a short-form merger. If BCC completes the tender and merger, we will again become a wholly- owned subsidiary of BCC. We have entered into a number of agreements with BCC regarding our ongoing relationship. Because our various relationships with BCC are so complex, each agreement or the transactions within it, considered separately, may contain terms less favorable to us than we might have obtained from an unaffiliated third party. Nevertheless, the company and BCC intend that these interrelated agreements and transactions, taken as a whole, should fairly accommodate our respective interests while continuing certain mutually beneficial joint arrangements. We may enter into additional or modified arrangements and transactions with BCC. While we expect any future arrangements and transactions to be negotiated, conflicts of interest may occur. Although we have not adopted any formal procedures to prevent conflicts of interest, we intend to seek our independent directors' approval for any agreement which our management or any independent director believes to be materially important to us and to involve a significant conflict of interest with BCC. Certain arrangements and transactions between us and BCC or its affiliates are summarized below. Paper Sales Agreement The majority of our purchases from BCC are under a Paper Sales Agreement whereby BCC sells us office papers. We calculate the prices for these papers with a formula meant to approximate prevailing market prices. The agreement has an initial term of 20 years, commencing April 1, 1995. It will automatically renew for five-year periods, subject to termination rights under specific circumstances. Administrative Services Agreement We also have an agreement under which BCC provides various administrative services to us. These services include, among others, financial reporting, cash management, human resources services, legal and corporate secretarial functions, internal audit, benefits administration, transfer agent functions, and insurance. These services are provided for varying periods, from one to five years, and may be renewed or terminated from time to time. BCC charges us rates for these services which reasonably approximate the cost to BCC of providing these services to us. During 1999, we paid BCC $3,272,000 under this agreement. Tax Matters Agreement We have entered into an agreement with BCC which allocates state and federal tax liabilities and obligations between us. Since April 1, 1995, we have been responsible for all tax liability which we incur. BCC must provide tax administration for us, and we must reimburse them for the administration costs. Shareholder Agreement Finally, we have an agreement with BCC which establishes certain rights for BCC to purchase shares of voting stock or securities convertible into voting stock which we may wish to sell from time to time. In addition, this agreement gives BCC certain demand and participation registration rights for the shares of our stock which it holds. Additional information concerning certain relationships and related transactions during 19971999 is set forth under the caption "Related Party Transactions" in our proxy statement and in Note 5,2, "Transactions With Boise Cascade Corporation," of the Notes to Financial Statements in our 1997 Annual Report bothPart II, Item 8 of which are incorporated by reference.this Form 10-K. PART IV ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K (a) The following documents are filed as a part of this Form 10-K for Boise Cascade Office Products Corporation: (1) Financial Statements (i) The Income Statement for the three months ended December 31, 1997, is incorporated by reference from our Fact Book for the fourth quarterSee listing of 1997. (ii) The Financial Statements the Notes to Financial Statements, and the Report of Independent Public Accountants listed below are incorporated by reference from our 1997 Annual Report. - Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1997 and 1996. - Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996, and 1995. - Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996, and 1995. - Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996, and 1995. - Notes to Financial Statements. - Report of Independent Public Accountants.included in this Form 10-K in Part II, Item 8. (2) Financial Statement Schedules None required. (3) Exhibits Required exhibits are listed in the Index to Exhibits and are incorporated by reference. (b) Reports on Form 8-K No Form 8-K's were filed during the lastfourth quarter covered by this report.of 1999. (c) Exhibits.Exhibits See Index to Exhibits. 22 23 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS CORPORATIONBoise Cascade Office Products Corporation By /s/ Peter G. Danis Jr. --------------------------------- Peter G. Danis Jr.Christopher C. Milliken ---------------------------- Christopher C. Milliken Chief Executive Officer Dated: March 18, 199829, 2000 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 18, 1998.29, 2000.
SIGNATURE CAPACITYSignature Capacity (i) Principal Executive Officer: /s/ Peter G. Danis Jr.Christopher C. Milliken --------------------------------------- Chief Executive Officer ----------------------------- PETER G. DANIS JR.Christopher C. Milliken (ii) Principal Financial Officer: /s/ A. James Balkins III --------------------------------------- Senior Vice President and -----------------------------A. James Balkins III Chief Financial Officer A. JAMES BALKINS III (iii) Principal Accounting Officer: /s/ Darrell R. ElfeldtThomas J. Jaszka --------------------------------------- Vice President and Controller ----------------------------- DARRELL R. ELFELDTThomas J. Jaszka (iv) Directors: /s/ Christopher C. Milliken --------------------------------------- Christopher C. Milliken /s/ George J. Harad --------------------------------------- George J. Harad /s/ John B. Carley --------------------------------------- John B. Carley /s/ James G. Connelly III --------------------------------------- James G. Connelly III /s/ Theodore Crumley --------------------------------------- Theodore Crumley /s/ Peter G. Danis Jr. ----------------------------- PETER--------------------------------------- Peter G. DANIS JR. /s/ George J. Harad ----------------------------- GEORGE J. HARAD /s/ John B. Carley ----------------------------- JOHN B. CARLEY /s/ James G. Connelly III ----------------------------- JAMES G. CONNELLY III /s/ Theodore Crumley ----------------------------- THEODORE CRUMLEY /s/ Christopher C. Milliken ----------------------------- CHRISTOPHER C. MILLIKENDanis Jr. /s/ A. William Reynolds ----------------------------------------------------------------- A. WILLIAM REYNOLDSWilliam Reynolds /s/ Donald E. Roller --------------------------------------- Donald E. Roller
23 24 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our report dated January 29, 1998, incorporated by reference28, 2000, included in this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997,1999, into Boise Cascade Office Products Corporation's previously filed registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 33-96348); registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 33-96512); registration statement on Form S-8 (file No. 333-1132); registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-1134); registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-1152); and post-effective amendment No. 1 to registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-3660); registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-50131); and registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-80989). /s/Arthur Andersen LLP Boise, Idaho March 18, 1998 2429, 2000 25 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS CORPORATION INDEX TO EXHIBITS Filed With the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 19971999
Number Description Page Number ---------- ---------------------------------------------------- ------ ----------- ----------- 2.1 (1) Asset Transfer and Subscription Agreement dated April 1, 1995 -- 2.2 (2) Share Purchase Agreement dated July 2, 1997, by and among Boise Cascade Office Products Corporation, Jean-Paul Guisset, and Mrs. Marie Annick Guisset -- 3.1 (3) Restated Certificate of Incorporation -- 3.2 (4) Bylaws, as amended October 11, 1995 -- 4.1 (1) Specimen Certificate Representing Shares of Common Stock -- 4.2 (5) Credit Agreement dated June 26, 1997 -- 9 Inapplicable -- 10.1 (4)(6) Form of Executive Officer Severance Agreement, adopted January 30, 1996as amended through August 3, 1999 -- 10.2 (3) Administrative Services Agreement dated April 1, 1995 -- 10.3 (6)(7) Paper Sales Agreement dated April 1, 1995 -- 10.4 (3) License Agreement dated April 1, 1995 -- 10.5 (3) Shareholder Agreement dated April 1, 1995 -- 10.6 (3) Tax Matters Agreement dated April 1, 1995 -- 10.7 (7)(8) Key Executive Stock Option Plan, adoptedas amended through February 20, 199516, 1999 -- 10.8 (8)(9) Director Stock Option Plan, as amended through December 17, 1996 -- 10.9 (3) Form of Confidential Information and Noncompetitive Agreement, approved February 20, 1995 -- 10.10 (3)(6) Early Retirement Plan for Executive Officers, effective February 20, 1995as amended through August 3, 1999 -- 10.11 (3)(6) Supplemental Pension Plan, effective February 20, 1995as amended through August 3, 1999 -- 10.12 (3) Key Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, effective February 20, 1995 -- 10.13 (3) Executive Officer Financial Counseling Program, adopted February 20, 1995 --as amended through August 3, 1999 10.14 (4) Split-Dollar Life Insurance Plan, as amended July 27, 1995 -- 10.15 (8)(9) Supplemental Health Care Plan for Executive Officers, revised July 31, 1996 -- 10.16 (3) Executive Officer Severance Pay Policy, adopted February 20, 1995 -- 10.17 (3) Key Executive Performance Plan, adopted February 20, 1995 --
25 26
Number Description Page Number ---------- --------------------------------------------------- ----------- 10.17 (3) Key Executive Performance Plan, adopted February 20, 1995 -- 10.18 19971999 and 19982000 Performance Criteria for the Key Executive Performance Plan 28 10.19 (3) Board of Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, effective February 14, 1995 -- 10.20 (4) 1995 Executive Officer Deferred Compensation Plan, effective January 1, 1996 -- 10.21 (4) 1995 Board of Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, effective January 1, 1996 -- 10.22 (9)(10) Form of Deferred Compensation and Benefits Trust dated January 30, 1996 -- 10.23 Executive Officer Wellness Program, adopted August 3, 1999 11 Computation of Per Share Earnings 30Inapplicable -- 12 Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges 31 13.1 Incorporated sections of the Boise Cascade Office Products Corporation 1997 Annual Report 32 13.213 Incorporated sections of the Boise Cascade Office Products Corporation Fact Book for the fourth quarter of 1997 521999 16 Inapplicable -- 18 Inapplicable -- 21 Significant subsidiaries of the registrant 56 22 Inapplicable -- 23 Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP (see page 24)65) 24 Inapplicable -- 27 Financial Data Schedule 57 28 Inapplicable -- 99 Inapplicable --
(1) Exhibits 2.1 and 4.1 were filed under the same exhibit numbers in our Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on March 28, 1995, and are incorporated by reference. (2) Exhibit 2.2 was filed as Exhibit 2 in our current report on Form 8-K filed on July 17, 1997, and is incorporated by reference. (3) Exhibits 3.1, 10.2, 10.4, 10.5, 10.6, 10.9, 10.10, 10.11, 10.12, 10.13, 10.16, 10.17, and 10.19 were filed under the same exhibit numbers in our Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on February 22, 1995, and are incorporated by reference. (4) Exhibits 3.2, 10.1, 10.14, 10.20, and 10.21 were filed under the same exhibit numbers in our 1995 Annual Report on Form 10-K and are incorporated by reference. (5) The Credit Agreement dated June 26, 1997, was filed as Exhibit 4 in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997, and is incorporated by reference. (6) The Form of Executive Officer Severance Agreement, Early Retirement Plan for Executive Officers, and Supplemental Pension Plan were filed as Exhibits 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3 in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999, and are incorporated by reference. (7) Exhibit 10.3 was filed under the same exhibit number in our Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on March 28, 1995, and is incorporated by 26 27 reference. The Company has been granted an order of confidential treatment with respect to a portion of Exhibit 10.3. (7) The Key Executive Stock Option Plan, as amended through April 23, 1996,(8) Exhibit 10.7 was filed as Exhibit 10.1under the same exhibit number in our Quarterly1998 Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1996,10-K and is incorporated by reference. (8)(9) Exhibits 10.8 and 10.15 were filed under the same exhibit numbers in our 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K and are incorporated by reference. (9)(10) The Form of Deferred Compensation and Benefits Trust dated January 30, 1996, was filed as Exhibit 10 in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1996, and is incorporated by reference. 27