UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(MARK ONE)
[X]
(Mark One)
x
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002
2005
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
o
| TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE |
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM _________________ TO _________________
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 333-43005
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC.
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| Ohio (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | 34-6520107 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
| 23000 Cleveland, Ohio (Address of principal executive offices) | 44117 (Zip Code) | |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (216) 692-7200
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) OF THE ACT:
NONE
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTIONof the Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) OF THE ACT:
NONE
PURSUANT TO A CORPORATE REORGANIZATION EFFECTIVE JUNEof the Act:
None
Pursuant to a corporate reorganization effective June 15, 1998, PARK-OHIO
INDUSTRIES, INC. BECAME A WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP.
THE REGISTRANT MEETS THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS I 1(a) ANDPark-Ohio Industries, Inc. became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. The registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instructions (I)(1)(a) and (b) OF FORMof Form 10-K AND IS THEREFORE FILING THIS FORM WITH THE REDUCED DISCLOSURE
FORMAT.
and is therefore filing this form with reduced disclosure format.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o Nox
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o Nox
Indicate by check mark whether the registrantregistrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X]x No [ ]
o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant'sregistrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]
x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated fileroAccelerated fileroNon-accelerated filerx
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes [ ]o No [X]x
All of the outstanding stock of the registrant is held by Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. As of March 27, 2003,15, 2006, 100 shares of the registrant'sregistrant’s common stock, $1 par value, were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: NONE
PARTREFERENCE
None
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
THE COMPANY
| Item 1. | Business |
Overview
Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. ("Park-Ohio"(“Park-Ohio”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. ("Holdings"(“Holdings”), was incorporated as an Ohio corporation in 1985.1984. Park-Ohio, primarily through its subsidiaries, is a leading provider ofan industrial supply chain logistics services and a manufacturer of highly engineered
products. Referencediversified manufacturing business operating in three segments: Integrated Logistics Solutions (“ILS”), Aluminum Products and Manufactured Products.
References herein to the "Company" includes,“we” or “the Company” include, where applicable,
Holdings, Park-Ohio and its direct and indirect subsidiaries.
The Company operates through three segments, Integrated Logistics Solutions
("ILS"),
ILS provides our customers with integrated supply chain management services for a broad range of high-volume, specialty production components. Our Aluminum Products business manufactures cast and machined aluminum components, and our Manufactured Products. ILSProducts business is a leading supply
chain logistics providermajor manufacturer of production components tohighly-engineered industrial products. Our businesses serve large, multinational
manufacturing companies, otherindustrial original equipment manufacturers and distributors. In connection
with the supply of such production components, ILS provides(“OEMs”) in a variety of value-added, cost-effective supply chain management services. The principal
customers of ILS are inindustrial sectors, including the semiconductor equipment,automotive and vehicle parts, heavy-duty truck, industrial equipment, steel, rail, electrical distribution and controls, aerospace and defense, oil and gas, power sports/ fitness equipment, HVAC, electrical controls, heating,
ventilatingcomponents, appliance and air-conditioning ("HVAC"), vehicle parts and accessories,
appliances and lawn and gardensemiconductor equipment industries. Aluminum Products
manufactures cast aluminum components for automotive, agricultural equipment,
heavy-duty truck and construction equipment manufacturers. Aluminum Products
also provides value-added services such as design and engineering, machining and
assembly. Manufactured Products operates a diverse group of niche manufacturing
businesses that design and manufacture a broad range of high quality products
engineered for specific customer applications. The principal customers of
Manufactured Products are original equipment manufacturers ("OEMs") and
end-users in the aerospace, automotive, steel, forging, railroad, truck, oil,
food processing and consumer appliance industries. As of December 31, 2002, the
Company2005, we employed approximately 2,9003,400 persons.
OPERATIONS
The following chart highlights the Company's three business segments, the
primary industries they serve andtable summarizes the key products they sell.
attributes of each of our business segments:
| Integrated Logistics | ||||||
| Solutions | Aluminum Products | Manufactured Products | ||||
NET SALES | $532.6 million (57% of total) | $159.1 million (17% of total) | $241.2 million (26% of total) | |||
| SELECTED | Sourcing, planning components, including: • Fasteners • Pins • Valves • Hoses • Wire harnesses • Clamps and • Rubber and components |
| • Pump housings • Clutch retainers/ pistons • Control arms • Knuckles • Master cylinders • Pinion housings • Brake calipers • Oil pans • Flywheel spacers | • Induction heating and melting • Pipe threading systems • Industrial oven systems • Injection molded rubber • Forging presses | |||||
| SELECTED INDUSTRIES SERVED | • Heavy-duty truck • Automotive and • Electrical distribution and controls • Power sports/ fitness equipment • HVAC • Aerospace and defense • Electrical components • Appliance • Semiconductor equipment | • Automotive • Agricultural equipment • Construction equipment • Heavy-duty truck • Marine equipment | • Steel • Coatings • Forging • Foundry • Heavy-duty truck • Construction equipment • Bottling • Automotive • Oil and gas • Rail and locomotive manufacturing • Aerospace and defense |
| (1) | Results are for the year ended December 31, 2005 and exclude the results of operations related to the assets of the Purchased Parts Group, Inc. prior to the date of acquisition on July 20, 2005. |
Integrated Logistics Solutions
Our ILS is a leading provider of cross-industrybusiness provides our customers with integrated supply chain management services for a broad range of high-volume, specialty production components. Our ILS customers receive various value-
1
added services, such as engineering and specializesdesign services, part usage and cost analysis, supplier selection, quality assurance, bar coding, product packaging and tracking,just-in-time andpoint-of-use delivery, electronic billing services and ongoing technical support. We operate 40 logistics service centers in the United States, Mexico, Canada, Puerto Rico and Europe as well as production sourcing and support centers in Asia. Through our supply chain management programs, we supply more than 175,000 globally-sourced production components, many of which are specialized and customized to meet individual customers’ needs.
In July 2005, we acquired substantially all of the assets of the Purchased Parts Group, Inc. (“PPG”), a provider of supply chain management services for a broad range of production components, operating 12 service centers in the United States, the United Kingdom and Mexico. This acquisition added significantly to our customer and supplier bases, and expanded our geographic presence. ILS has eliminated substantial overhead costs from PPG and begun the process of planning, implementing, and managingconsolidating redundant service centers. The historical financial data contained throughout this annual report on Form 10-K exclude the physical flowresults of production components to large multinational manufacturing
companiesoperations of PPG, other than for the period from the point of manufacturingJuly 20, 2005 through December 31, 2005. See Note C to the point of use. ILS generated net
sales of $398.1 million, or 63% of the Company's net sales, for the year ended
December 31, 2002. ILS operates supply chain logistics facilities, throughout
the United States, Canada, Puerto Rico, Mexico and England. ILS continues to
consolidate its network of branches to reduce costs and serve its customers more
efficiently.
Large, multinational manufacturing companies continue to make it a priority
to reduce their total cost of production components. Administrative and overhead
costs to source, plan, purchase, quality-assure, inventory and handle production
components comprise a large portion of total cost. ILS has the size, experience,
highly-customized computer system and focus to reduce these costs substantially
while providing reliable just-in-time delivery directly to the point of use.
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein.
Products and Services. Supply chain management services, which is ILS'ILS’s primary focus for future growth, involves offering customers comprehensive,on-site management for most of their production component needs. Some production components are characterized by low per unit supplier prices relative to the indirect costs of supplier management, quality assurance, inventory management and delivery to the production line. In addition, ILS delivers an increasingly broad range of higher costhigher-cost production components including valves, fittings, steering components and many others. Supply chain management customers receive
various value-added services, such as part usage and cost analysis, supplier
selection, quality assurance, bar coding, product packaging and tracking,
just-in-time delivery, electronic billing services and ongoing technical
support. ILS also provides engineering and design services to its customers. Applications-engineering specialists and the direct sales force work closely with the engineering staff of OEM customers to recommend the appropriate production components for a new product or to suggest alternative components that reduce overall production costs, streamline assembly or enhance the appearance or performance of the end product. Recently, ILS has begun to provide
asAs an additional service, ILS recently began providing spare parts and aftermarket products to the final end userusers of its customers'customers’ products.
Supply chain management services are typically provided to customers pursuant to sole-source arrangements. We believe our services distinguish us from traditional buy/sell distributors, as well as manufacturers who supply products directly to customers, because we outsource our customers’ high-volume production components supply chain services contracts. These agreements enable
ILS'management, providing processes customized to each customer’s needs and replacing numerous current suppliers with a sole-source relationship. Our highly-developed, customized, information systems provide transparency and flexibility through the complete supply chain. This enables our customers to bothto: (1) significantly reduce procurement coststhe direct and better focus on their core
manufacturing competencies by: (i) significantly reducing theindirect cost of production component procurementprocesses by outsourcing many internal purchasing, quality assurance and inventory fulfillment responsibilities; (ii) reducing(2) reduce the amount of working capital invested in inventory; (iii) achievinginventory and floor space; (3) reduce component costs through purchasing efficiencies, including bulk buying and cost
reductionssupplier consolidation; and (4) receive technical expertise in production component selection and design and engineering. Our sole-source arrangements foster long-term, entrenched supply relationships with our customers and, as a result, the average tenure of supplier consolidation; and
2
(iv) receiving technical expertise in the selection of production componentsservice for certain manufacturing processes. The Company believes that such agreements
foster longer-lasting supply relationships with customers, who increasingly rely
onour top 50 ILS for their production component needs, as compared to traditional buy/sell
distribution relationships. Sales pursuant to sole-source supply chain service
contracts have increased significantly in recent years and represented over 72%
of ILS' sales in 2002. ILS'clients exceeds twelve years. ILS’s remaining sales are generated through the wholesale supply of industrial products to other manufacturers and distributors pursuant to master or authorized distributor relationships.
ILS also engineers and manufactures precision cold formed and cold extruded products, including locknuts, SPAC(R)SPAC® nuts and wheel hardware, which are principally used in applications where controlled tightening is required due to high vibration. ILS produces both standard items and specialty products to customer specifications, which are used in large volumes by customers in the automotive, heavy-duty truck and railroadrail industries.
Markets and Customers. In 2002, For the year ended December 31, 2005, approximately 78%90% of ILS'ILS’s net sales were to domestic customers. Remaining sales were primarily to manufacturing facilities of large, multinational customers located in Canada, Mexico and the
United Kingdom.Europe. Supply chain management services and production components are used extensively in a variety of industries, and demand is generally related to the state of the economy and to the overall level of manufacturing activity.
2
ILS markets and sells its services to over 10,0006,000 customers domestically and internationally. The principal markets served by ILS are semiconductorthe heavy-duty truck, automotive and vehicle parts, electrical distribution and controls, power sports/ fitness equipment, heavy duty truck, industrial equipment,HVAC, aerospace and defense, electrical controls, HVAC, vehicle partscomponents, appliance and accessories, appliances, and lawn
and gardensemiconductor equipment industries. The tenfive largest customers, within which ILS sells through sole-source contracts to multiple operating divisions or locations, accounted for approximately 40% and 38% of sales of ILS in 2002. Threefor 2005 and 2004, respectively, with International Truck representing 20% and 15%, respectively, of segment sales. Two of the tenfive largest customers are in the heavy-duty truck industry. The loss of the International Truck account or any onetwo of thesethe remaining top five customers wouldcould have a material adverse effect on the results of operations and financial condition of this segment.
Competition. There areis a limited number of companies who compete with ILS for supply chain service contracts. ILS competes mainly with domestic competitors primarily on the basis of its value-added services, which includesinclude sourcing, engineering and delivery capabilities, geographic reach, extensive product selection, price and reputation for high service levels with primarily domestic competitors who are
capable of providing supply chain logistics services.
ALUMINUM PRODUCTS
The levels.
Aluminum Products segment generated net sales of $106.2 million, or 17%
of the Company's net sales, for the year ended December 31, 2002. Management
believes Aluminum Products is
We believe that we are one of the few part suppliers that has the capability to provide a wide range of high volume, high qualityhigh-volume, high-quality products utilizing a broad range of processes, including gravity and low pressure permanent mold, die-cast, sand-cast die-cast and lost-foam, products.as well as emerging alternative casting technologies. Our ability to offer our customers this comprehensive range of capabilities at a low cost provides us with a competitive advantage. We produce our aluminum components at five manufacturing facilities in Ohio and Indiana.
Products and Services. Our Aluminum Products business casts and machines these products at three plants in two states. During the past two years,
Aluminum Products substantially improved its operating efficiency by
consolidating manufacturing facilities.
Aluminum Products' cast aluminum parts are manufacturedengine, transmission, brake, suspension and other components for automotive, agricultural equipment, construction equipment, heavy-duty truck and constructionmarine equipment OEMs, primarily located in North America.on a sole-source basis. Aluminum Products'Products’ principal products include: transmissioninclude pump housings, intake manifolds, planetary pinion
carriers, oil filter adapters, clutch retainers bearing cups, brackets,and pistons, control arms, knuckles, master cylinders, pinion housings, brake calipers, oil pans and flywheel spacers. Aluminum ProductsIn addition, we also providesprovide value-added services such as design engineering, machining drilling, tapping and part assembly. Although these parts are lightweight, they possess high durability and integrity characteristics even under extreme pressure and temperature conditions.
Demand by automotive OEMs for aluminum castings has increased in recent years as OEMsthey have sought lighter alternatives to heavier steel and iron, components. Lighter aluminum cast componentsprimarily to increase
an automobile's fuel efficiency without decreasingcompromising structural integrity. Management believesWe believe that this replacement trend will continue as end-users and government standards regardingthe regulatory environment require greater fuel efficiency. To capitalize on this trend, in August 2004, we acquired substantially all of the assets of the Amcast Components Group, a producer of aluminum automotive fuel efficiency become increasingly
stringent.components. This acquisition significantly increased the sales and production capacity of our Aluminum Products business and added attractive new customers, product lines and production technologies. The historical financial data contained throughout this annual report on Form 10-K exclude the results of operations of the Amcast Components Group other than for the period from August 23, 2004 through December 31, 2005.
Markets and Customers. The five largest customers, ofwithin which Aluminum Products sells to multiple operating divisions through sole sourcesole-source contracts, accounted for approximately 84%53% of Aluminum Products sales in 2002.for 2005 and 58% for 2004. The loss of any one of 3
these customers wouldcould have a material adverse effect on the results of operations and financial condition of this segment.
Competition. The
domestic aluminum castings industry is highly competitive. Aluminum Products competes principally on the basis of its ability to: (i)(1) engineer and manufacture high quality, cost effective,high-quality, cost-effective, machined castings utilizing multiple casting technologies in large volumes; (ii)(2) provide timely delivery; and (iii)(3) retain the manufacturing flexibility necessary to quickly adjust to the needs of its customers. Although there are a number of smaller domestic companies with aluminum casting capabilities, the customers'customers’ stringent quality and service standards and lean manufacturing techniques enable only large suppliers with the requisite quality certifications to compete effectively. As one of these suppliers,
3
Aluminum Products is structuredwell-positioned to benefit as customers continue to consolidate their supplier base.
MANUFACTURED PRODUCTS
The
Manufactured Products
Our Manufactured Products segment includesoperates a diverse group of niche manufacturing businesses involved in the
manufacturingthat design and manufacture a broad range of highly-engineered products, including induction heating and melting systems, pipe threading systems, rubber products and forged and machined products. We manufacture these products in eleven domestic facilities and other capital equipment. Manufactured Products generated net sales
of $130.2 million, or 20%nine international facilities in Canada, Mexico, the United Kingdom, Belgium, Germany, Poland, China and Japan. In December 2005, we acquired substantially all of the Company's net sales,assets of Lectrotherm, Inc. (“Lectrotherm”), which is primarily a provider of field service and spare parts for the year ended
December 31, 2002. The five largest customers, within which Manufactured
induction heating and melting systems, located in Canton, Ohio.
Products sells primarily through sole-source contracts to multiple operating
divisions, accounted for approximately 25% of Manufactured Products sales in
2002. The loss of business from any one of these customers would have an adverse
effect on this segment.
The Company'sand Services. Our induction heating and melting business Ajax Tocco
Magnethermic ("Ajax Tocco"),utilizes proprietary technology and specializes in the engineering, construction, service and repair of induction heating and melting systems, primarily for the steel, coatings, forging, foundry, automotive and construction equipment industries. Ajax Tocco'sOur induction heating and melting systems are engineered and built to customer specifications and are used primarily for melting, heating, and surface hardening of metals and curing of coatings. Approximately half35% to 40% of Ajax Tocco's revenueour induction heating and melting systems’ revenues is derived from the sale of replacement parts and provision of field service, primarily for the installed base of itsour own products. Ajax Tocco competes
Additional manufactured products include other capital equipment, forged and machined metal components, and injection-molded rubber and silicone products. We manufacture other capital equipment such as pipe threading equipment for the oil and gas industry, and industrial oven systems and provide field service and spare parts for such equipment. We also engineer and install mechanical forging presses, and sell spare parts and provide field service for the large existing base of mechanical forging presses and hammers in North America. We machine, induction harden and surface finish crankshafts of up to 6,000 pounds and camshafts, used primarily in locomotives. We forge aerospace and defense structural components such as landing gears and struts, as well as rail products such as railcar center plates and draft lugs. We injection mold rubber and silicone products, including wire harnesses, shock and vibration mounts, spark plug boots and nipples and general sealing gaskets.
Markets and Customers. We sell induction heating and other capital equipment to component manufacturers and OEMs in the steel, coatings, forging, foundry, automotive, truck, construction equipment and oil and gas industries. We sell forged and machined products to locomotive manufacturers, machining companies and sub-assemblers who finish aerospace and defense products for OEMs, and railcar builders and maintenance providers. We sell rubber products primarily to sub-assemblers in the automotive, food processing and consumer appliance industries.
Competition. We compete with small- to medium-sized domestic and international equipment manufacturers on the basis of service capability, ability to meet customer specifications, delivery performance and engineering expertise. The Company manufactures injection molded rubberWe compete domestically and silicone products for
use in automotiveinternationally with small- to medium-sized forging and industrial applications. The rubber products facilities
manufacture products for customers in the automotive, food processing and
consumer appliance industries. Their products include wire harnesses, shock and
vibration mounts, spark plug boots and nipples and general sealing gaskets.
During 2002, the Company reduced rubber products' costs and discontinued
underperforming products by selling one business unit and closing one other
manufacturing plant. The rubber products operating units compete primarilymachining businesses on the basis of priceproduct quality and product qualityprecision. We compete with other domestic small- to medium-sized manufacturers of injection molded rubber and silicone products.
The Company produces forged and machined products consisting of closed-die
metal forgings of up to 6,000 pounds, including crankshafts and aircraft landing
gears. Some forged products are sold primarily to machining companies, and
sub-assemblers who finish the products for sale to OEMs in the railroad and
aerospace industries. The Company also machines, induction hardens and surface
finishes crankshafts and camshafts used primarily in locomotives. In 2002, the
Company opened a new manufacturing facility, which began shipping forged rail
products in early 2003. Forged and machined products are sold to a wide variety
of domestic and international OEMs and other manufacturers, primarily in the
transportation industries. The Company's forged and machined products business
competes domestically and internationally with other small- to medium-sized
businesses on the basis of price and product qualityquality.
Sales and precision.
The Company also produces other capital equipment including pipe threading
equipment and related parts for the oil drilling industry, and complete oven
systems that combine heat processing and curing technologies with material
handling and conveying methods. Through 2001, the Company engineered,
manufactured and serviced mechanical forging presses for the automotive and
truck manufacturing industries. The Company continues to provide some spare
parts and field service for the existing
4
installed base of forging presses. These capital equipment units compete with
small to medium-sized domestic and international equipment manufacturers on the
basis of service capability, ability to meet customer specifications, delivery
performance and engineering expertise.
SALES AND MARKETINGMarketing
ILS markets its products and services in the United States, Mexico, Canada and Europe, primarily through its direct sales force, which is assisted by applications engineers who provide the technical expertise necessary to assist the engineering staff of OEM customers in designing new products and improving existing products. Aluminum Products primarily markets and sells its products in North America through internal sales personnel. Manufactured Products primarily markets and sells its products in North America through both internal sales personnel and independent sales representatives. Induction heating and pipe threading equipment is also marketed and sold in Europe, Asia, Latin
4
America and North Africa through both internal sales personnel and independent sales representatives. In some instances, the internal engineering staff assists in the sales and marketing effort through joint design and applications-engineering efforts with major customers.
RAW MATERIALS AND SUPPLIERS
Raw Materials and Suppliers
ILS purchases substantially all of its production components from third-party suppliers. Aluminum Products and Manufactured Products purchase substantially all of their raw materials, principally metals and certain component parts incorporated into their products, from third-party suppliers and manufacturers. Management believes that raw materials and component parts other than certain specialty products are available from alternative sources. ILS has multiple sources of supply for its products. Approximately 25%An increasing portion of ILS'ILS’s delivered components are purchased from suppliers in foreign countries, primarily Canada, Taiwan, China, South Korea, Singapore, India and China. The Company ismultiple European countries. We are dependent upon the ability of such suppliers to meet stringent quality and performance standards and to conform to delivery schedules. Most raw materials required by Aluminum Products and Manufactured Products are commodity products available from several domestic suppliers.
CUSTOMER DEPENDENCE
The Company has
Customer Dependence
We have thousands of customers who demand quality, delivery and service. Numerous customers have recognized our performance by awarding the
Companyus with supplier quality awards. Ford Motor Company is theThe only customer accountingwhich accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated sales withinin any of the past three years (onlywas International Truck in the year 2000).
BACKLOGall three years. In September 2005, we entered into an exclusive, multi-year agreement with International Truck to supply a wide range of production components, expiring on December 31, 2008.
Backlog
Management believes that backlog is not a meaningful measure for ILS, as a majority of ILS'ILS’s customers require just-in-timejust-in-time delivery of production components. Management believes that Aluminum Products'Products’ and Manufactured Products'Products’ backlog as of any particular date is not a meaningful measure of sales for any future period as a significant portion of sales are on a release or firm order basis.
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS
The Company is
Environmental, Health and Safety Regulations
We are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations designed to protect public health and the environment,
("Environmental Laws"), particularly with regard to discharges and emissions, as well as handling, storage, treatment and disposal, of various substances and wastes. Our failure to comply with applicable environmental laws and regulations and permit requirements could result in civil and criminal fines or penalties or enforcement actions, including regulatory or judicial orders enjoining or curtailing operations or requiring corrective measures. Pursuant to certain Environmental Laws,environmental laws, owners or operators of facilities may be liable for the costs of response or other corrective actions for contamination identified at or emanating from current or former locations, without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of any such contamination, and for related damages to natural resources. Additionally, persons who arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances or materials may be liable 5
for costs of response at sites where they are located, whether or not the site is owned or operated by such person.
From time to time, we have incurred and are presently incurring costs and obligations for correcting environmental noncompliance and remediating environmental conditions at certain of our properties. In general, the Company haswe have not experienced difficulty in complying with Environmental Lawsenvironmental laws in the past, and compliance with Environmental Lawsenvironmental laws has not had a material adverse effect on the Company'sour financial condition, liquidity and results of operations. The Company'sOur capital expenditures on environmental control facilities were not material during the past five years and such expenditures are not expected to be material to the Companyus in the foreseeable future.
The Company has
5
We are currently, and may in the future, be required to incur costs relating to the investigation or remediation of property, including property where we have disposed of our waste, and for addressing environmental conditions. For instance, we have been identified as a potentially responsible party at third-party sites under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, or comparable state laws, which provide for strict and, under certain circumstances, joint and several liability. The
Company isWe are participating in the cost of certainclean-up efforts at several of these sites. The availability of third-party payments or insurance for environmental remediation activities is subject to risks associated with the willingness and ability of the third party to make payments. However, the
Company'sour share of such costs has not been material and, based on available information, the Company doeswe do not expect itsour exposure at any of these locations to have a material adverse effect on itsour results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.
INFORMATION AS TO INDUSTRY SEGMENT REPORTING AND GEOGRAPHIC AREAS
Information as to Industry Segment Reporting and Geographic Areas
The information contained under the heading “Note K—Industry Segments” of "Note J--Industry Segments"
ofthe notes to the consolidated financial statements included herein, relating to (1) net sales, income (loss) before income taxes, identifiable assets and other information by industry segment and (2) net sales and assets by geographic region for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001,2005, 2004, and 20002003 is incorporated herein by reference.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
Recent Developments
The information contained under the heading of "Note C--Acquisitions and
Dispositions" and "Note L--Restructuring and Unusual Charges"“Note C—Acquisitions” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements included herein is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Available Information
We file annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and other information, including amendments to these reports, with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The Company'spublic can obtain copies of these materials by visiting the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549, by calling the SEC at1-800-SEC-0330, or by accessing the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, as soon as reasonably practicable after such materials are filed with or furnished to the SEC, we make such materials available on our website at http://www.pkoh.com. The information on our website is not a part of this annual report on Form 10-K.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The following are certain risk factors that could affect our business, results of operations includeand financial condition. These risks are not the only ones we face. If any of the following risks occur, our business, results of operations or financial condition could be adversely affected.
| The industries in which we operate are cyclical and are affected by the economy in general. |
We sell products to customers in industries that experience cyclicality (expectancy of recurring periods of economic growth and slowdown) in demand for products, and may experience substantial increases and decreases in business volume throughout economic cycles. Industries we serve, including the automotive and vehicle parts, heavy-duty truck, industrial equipment, steel, rail, electrical distribution and controls, aerospace and defense, power sports/ fitness equipment, HVAC, electrical components, appliance and semiconductor equipment industries, are affected by consumer spending, general economic conditions and the impact of international trade. A downturn in any of the industries we serve, particularly the domestic automotive or heavy-duty truck industry, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
6
| Because a significant portion of our sales is to the automotive and heavy-duty truck industries, a decrease in the demand of these industries or the loss of any of our major customers in these industries could adversely affect our financial health. |
Demand for certain of our products is affected by, among other things, the relative strength or weakness of the automotive and heavy-duty truck industries. The domestic automotive and heavy-duty truck industries are highly cyclical and may be adversely affected by international competition. In addition, the automotive and heavy-duty truck industries are significantly unionized and subject to work slowdowns and stoppages resulting from labor disputes. We derived 28% and 21% of our net sales during the year ended December 31, 2005 from the automobile and heavy-duty truck industries, respectively. International Truck, our largest customer, accounted for approximately 12% of our net sales for the year ended December 31, 2005. The loss of a portion of business to International Truck or any of our other major automotive or heavy-duty truck customers could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, cash flow and results of operations. We cannot assure you that we will maintain or improve our relationships in these industries or that we will continue to supply this customer at current levels.
| Our ILS customers are generally not contractually obligated to purchase products and services from us. |
Most of the products and services are provided to our ILS customers under purchase orders as opposed to long-term contracts. When we do enter into long-term contracts with our customers, many of them only establish pricing terms and do not obligate our customers to buy required minimum amounts from us or to buy from us exclusively. Accordingly, many of our ILS customers may decrease the amount of products and services that they purchase from us or even stop purchasing from us altogether, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our net sales and profitability.
| We are dependent on key customers. |
We rely on several key customers. For the year ended December 31, 2005, our top ten customers accounted for approximately 34% of our net sales and our top customer, International Truck, accounted for approximately 12% of our net sales. Many of our customers place orders for products on an as-needed basis and operate in cyclical industries and, as a result, their order levels have varied from period to period in the past and may vary significantly in the future. Due to competitive issues, we have lost key customers in the past and may again in the future. Customer orders are dependent upon their markets and may be subject to delays or cancellations. As a result of dependence on our key customers, we could experience a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations if any of the following were to occur:
| • | the loss of any key customer, in whole or in part; | |
| • | the insolvency or bankruptcy of any key customer; | |
| • | a declining market in which customers reduce orders or demand reduced prices; or | |
| • | a strike or work stoppage at a key customer facility, which could affect both their suppliers and customers. |
If any of our key customers become insolvent or file for bankruptcy, our ability to recover accounts receivable from that customer would be adversely affected and any payments we received in the preference period prior to a bankruptcy filing may be potentially recoverable, which could adversely impact our results of operations.
Three of our customers filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy code during 2004 and 2005. These were Murray, Inc., a customer of ILS, in 2004 and Delphi Corp. and Dana Corporation, primarily customers of our Manufactured Products and Aluminum Products segments, in 2005. Collectively, these bankruptcies reduced our operating income by $2.3 million during 2004 and 2005 with a further negative impact of approximately $.4 million on our operating income expected in the first quarter of 2006.
7
| We operate in highly competitive industries. |
The markets in which all three of our segments sell their products are highly competitive. Some of our competitors are large companies that have greater financial resources than we have. We believe that the principal competitive factors for our ILS segment are an approach reflecting long-term business partnership and reliability, sourced product quality and conformity to customer specifications, timeliness of delivery, price and design and engineering capabilities. We believe that the principal competitive factors for our Aluminum Products and Manufactured Products segments are product quality and conformity to customer specifications, design and engineering capabilities, product development, timeliness of delivery and price. The rapidly evolving nature of the markets in which we compete may attract new entrants as they perceive opportunities, and our competitors may foresee the course of market development more accurately than we do. In addition, our competitors may develop products that are superior to our products or may adapt more quickly than we do to new technologies or evolving customer requirements.
We expect competitive pressures in our markets to remain strong. These pressures arise from existing competitors, other companies that may enter our existing or future markets and, in some cases, our customers, which may decide to internally produce items we sell. We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete successfully with our competitors. Failure to compete successfully could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
| The loss of key executives could adversely impact us. |
Our success depends upon the efforts, abilities and expertise of our executive officers and other senior managers, including Edward Crawford, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Matthew Crawford, our President and Chief Operating Officer, as well as the president of each of our operating units. An event of default occurs under our revolving credit facility if Messrs. E. Crawford and M. Crawford or certain of their related parties own less than 15% of Holdings’ outstanding common stock, or if they own less than 15% of such stock, then if either Mr. E. Crawford or Mr. M. Crawford ceases to hold the office of chairman, chief executive officer or president. The loss of the services of Messrs. E. Crawford and M. Crawford, senior and executive officers, and/or other key individuals could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
| We may encounter difficulty in expanding our business through targeted acquisitions. |
We have pursued, and may continue to pursue, targeted acquisition opportunities that we believe would complement our business, such as the acquisition of the PPG in 2005. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in consummating any acquisitions.
Any targeted acquisitions will be accompanied by the risks commonly encountered in acquisitions of businesses. We may not successfully overcome these risks or any other problems encountered in connection with any of our acquisitions, including the possible inability to integrate an acquired business’ operations, IT technologies, services and products into our business, diversion of management’s attention, the assumption of unknown liabilities, increases in our indebtedness, the failure to achieve the strategic objectives of those acquisitions and other unanticipated problems, some or all of which could materially and adversely affect us. The process of integrating operations could cause an interruption of, or loss of momentum in, our activities. Any delays or difficulties encountered in connection with any acquisition and the integration of our operations could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition or prospects of our business.
| Our ILS business depends upon third parties for substantially all of our component parts. |
ILS purchases substantially all of its component parts from third-party suppliers and manufacturers. Our business is subject to the risk of price fluctuations and periodic delays in the delivery of component parts. Failure by suppliers to continue to supply us with these component parts on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, would have a material adverse effect on us. We depend upon the ability of these suppliers, among other things, to meet stringent performance and quality specifications and to
8
conform to delivery schedules. Failure by third-party suppliers to comply with these and other requirements could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
| The raw materials used in our production processes and by our suppliers of component parts are subject to price and supply fluctuations that could increase our costs of production and adversely affect our results of operations. |
Our supply of raw materials for our Aluminum Products and Manufactured Products businesses could be interrupted for a variety of reasons, including availability and pricing. Prices for raw materials necessary for production have fluctuated significantly in the past and significant increases could adversely affect our results of operations and profit margins. While we generally attempt to pass along increased raw materials prices to our customers in the form of price increases, there may be a time delay between the increased raw materials prices and our ability to increase the price of our products, or we may be unable to increase the prices of our products due to pricing pressure or other factors.
Our suppliers of component parts, particularly in our ILS business, may significantly and quickly increase their prices in response to increases in costs of the raw materials, such as steel, that they use to manufacture our component parts. We may not be able to increase our prices commensurate with our increased costs. Consequently, our results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected.
| The energy costs involved in our production processes and transportation are subject to fluctuations that are beyond our control and could significantly increase our costs of production. |
Our manufacturing process and the transportation of raw materials, components and finished goods are energy intensive. Our manufacturing processes are dependent on adequate supplies of electricity and natural gas. A substantial increase in the cost of transportation fuel, natural gas or electricity could have a material adverse effect on our margins. We experienced substantially higher natural gas costs in 2004 and in 2005. We could continue to experience higher than anticipated gas costs in the future, which could adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, a disruption or curtailment in supply could have a material adverse effect on our production and sales levels.
| Potential product liability risks exist from the products which we sell. |
Our businesses expose us to potential product liability risks that are inherent in the design, manufacture and sale of our products and products of third-party vendors that we use or resell. While we currently maintain what we believe to be suitable and adequate product liability insurance, we cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain our insurance on acceptable terms or that our insurance will provide adequate protection against potential liabilities. In the event of a claim against us, a lack of sufficient insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations. Moreover, even if we maintain adequate insurance, any successful claim could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
| Some of our employees belong to labor unions, and strikes or work stoppages could adversely affect our operations. |
As of December 31, 2005, we were a party to eight collective bargaining agreements with various labor unions that covered approximately 575 full-time employees. Our inability to negotiate acceptable contracts with these unions could result in, among other things, strikes, work stoppages or other slowdowns by the affected workers and increased operating costs as a result of higher wages or benefits paid to union members. If the unionized workers were to engage in a strike, work stoppage or other slowdown, or other employees were to become unionized, we could experience a significant disruption of our operations and higher ongoing labor costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
9
| We operate and source internationally, which exposes us to the risks of doing business abroad. |
Our operations are subject to the risks of doing business abroad, including the following:
| • | fluctuations in currency exchange rates; | |
| • | limitations on ownership and on repatriation of earnings; | |
| • | transportation delays and interruptions; | |
| • | political, social and economic instability and disruptions; | |
| • | government embargoes or foreign trade restrictions; | |
| • | the imposition of duties and tariffs and other trade barriers; | |
| • | import and export controls; | |
| • | labor unrest and current and changing regulatory environments; | |
| • | the potential for nationalization of enterprises; | |
| • | difficulties in staffing and managing multinational operations; | |
| • | limitations on our ability to enforce legal rights and remedies; and | |
| • | potentially adverse tax consequences. |
Any of these events could have an adverse effect on our operations in the future by reducing the demand for our products and services, decreasing the prices at which we can sell our products or otherwise having an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. We cannot assure you that we will continue to operate in compliance with applicable customs, currency exchange control regulations, transfer pricing regulations or any other laws or regulations to which we may be subject. We also cannot assure you that these laws will not be modified.
| We are subject to significant environmental, health and safety laws and regulations and related compliance expenditures and liabilities. |
Our businesses are subject to many foreign, federal, state and local environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, particularly with respect to the use, handling, treatment, storage, discharge and disposal of substances and hazardous wastes used or generated in our manufacturing processes. Compliance with these laws and regulations is a significant factor in our business. We have incurred and expect to continue to incur significant expenditures to comply with applicable environmental laws and regulations. Our failure to comply with applicable environmental laws and regulations and permit requirements could result in civil or criminal fines or penalties or enforcement actions, including regulatory or judicial orders enjoining or curtailing operations or requiring corrective measures, installation of pollution control equipment or remedial actions.
We are currently, and may in the future be, required to incur costs relating to the investigation or remediation of property, including property where we have disposed of our waste, and for addressing environmental conditions. Some environmental laws and regulations impose liability and responsibility on present and former owners, operators or users of facilities and sites for contamination at such facilities and sites without regard to causation or knowledge of contamination. In addition, we occasionally evaluate various alternatives with respect to our facilities, including possible dispositions or closures. Investigations undertaken in connection with these activities may lead to discoveries of contamination that must be remediated, and closures of facilities may trigger compliance requirements that are not applicable to operating facilities. Consequently, we cannot assure you that existing or future circumstances, the development of new facts or the failure of third parties to address contamination at current or former facilities or properties will not require significant expenditures by us.
We expect to continue to be subject to increasingly stringent environmental and health and safety laws and regulations. It is difficult to predict the future interpretation and development of environmental and health and safety laws and regulations or their impact on our future earnings and operations. We
10
anticipate that compliance will continue to require increased capital expenditures and operating costs. Any increase in these costs, or unanticipated liabilities arising for example out of discovery of previously unknown conditions or more aggressive enforcement actions, could adversely affect our results of operations, and there is no assurance that they will not exceed our reserves or have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
| If our information systems fail, our business will be materially affected. |
We believe that our information systems are an integral part of the ILS segment and, to a lesser extent, the Aluminum Products and Manufactured Products segments. We depend on our information systems to process orders, manage inventory and accounts receivable collections, purchase products, maintain cost-effective operations, route and re-route orders and provide superior service to our customers. We cannot assure you that a disruption in the operation of our information systems used by ILS, including the failure of the supply chain management software to function properly, or those used by Aluminum Products and Manufactured Products will not occur. Any such disruption could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
| Operating problems in our business may materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. |
The occurrence of material operating problems at our facilities may have a material adverse effect on our operations as a whole, both during and after the period of operational difficulties. We are subject to the usual hazards associated with manufacturing and the related storage and transportation of raw materials, products and waste, including explosions, fires, leaks, discharges, inclement weather, natural disasters, mechanical failure, unscheduled downtime and transportation interruption or calamities.
| Our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and our President and Chief Operating Officer collectively beneficially own a significant portion of our parent company’s outstanding common stock and their interests may conflict with yours. |
As of February 28, 2006, Edward Crawford, our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and Matthew Crawford, our President and Chief Operating Officer, collectively beneficially owned approximately 26% of Holdings’ common stock. Mr. E. Crawford is Mr. M. Crawford’s father. Their interests could conflict with your interests. For example, if we encounter financial difficulties or are unable to pay our debts as they mature, the interests of Messrs. E. Crawford and M. Crawford may conflict with your interests.
| Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments |
None.
| Item 2. | Properties |
As of December 31, 2005, our operations included numerous manufacturing and supply chain logistics services facilities located in twenty-two23 states in the United States, and in Puerto Rico, as well as in Belgium,Asia, Canada, EnglandEurope and Mexico. Approximately 93%88% of the available square footage iswas located in the United States. Approximately 43%49% of the available square footage iswas owned. In 2002,2005, approximately 32%36% of the available domestic square footage was used by the ILS segment, 52%36% was used by the Manufactured Products segment and 16%28% by the Aluminum Products segment. Approximately 49%36% of the available foreign square footage was used by the ILS segment and 51%64% was used by the Manufactured Products segment. In the opinion of management, Park-Ohio'sour facilities are generally well maintained and are suitable and adequate for their intended uses.
6
11
The following table provides information relative to theour principal facilities as of Park-Ohio and its subsidiaries.
December 31, 2005.
| Related Industry | Owned or | Approximate | ||||||||||
| Segment | Location | Leased | Square Footage | Use | ||||||||
| ILS(1) | Cleveland, OH | Leased | 60,350 | (2) | ILS Corporate Office | |||||||
| Memphis, TN | Leased | 121,700 | Logistics | |||||||||
| Dayton, OH | Leased | 112,960 | Logistics | |||||||||
| Lawrence, PA | Leased | 116,000 | Logistics and Manufacturing | |||||||||
| St. Paul, MN | Leased | 104,425 | Logistics | |||||||||
| Allentown, PA | Leased | 62,200 | Logistics | |||||||||
| Atlanta, GA | Leased | 56,000 | Logistics | |||||||||
| Dallas, TX | Leased | 49,985 | Logistics | |||||||||
| Nashville, TN | Leased | 44,900 | Logistics | |||||||||
| Charlotte, NC | Leased | 24,000 | Logistics | |||||||||
| Kent, OH | Leased | 225,000 | Manufacturing | |||||||||
| Mississauga, | Leased | 117,000 | Manufacturing | |||||||||
| Ontario, Canada | ||||||||||||
| Solon, OH | Leased | 42,600 | Logistics | |||||||||
| Dublin, VA | Leased | 40,000 | Logistics | |||||||||
| Delaware, OH | Owned | 45,000 | Manufacturing | |||||||||
| ALUMINUM | Conneaut, OH(3) | Leased/Owned | 304,000 | Manufacturing | ||||||||
| PRODUCTS | Huntington, IN | Leased | 132,000 | Manufacturing | ||||||||
| Fremont, IN | Owned | 108,000 | Manufacturing | |||||||||
| Wapakoneta, OH | Owned | 188,000 | Manufacturing | |||||||||
| Richmond, IN | Leased/Owned | 97,300 | Manufacturing | |||||||||
| Cedarburg, WI | Leased | 157,000 | Manufacturing | |||||||||
| MANUFACTURED | Cuyahoga Hts., OH | Owned | 427,000 | Manufacturing | ||||||||
| PRODUCTS(4) | Le Roeulx, Belgium | Owned | 120,000 | Manufacturing | ||||||||
| Euclid, OH | Owned | 154,000 | Manufacturing | |||||||||
| Wickliffe, OH | Owned | 110,000 | Manufacturing | |||||||||
| Boaz, AL | Owned | 100,000 | Manufacturing | |||||||||
| Warren, OH | Owned | 195,000 | Manufacturing | |||||||||
| Canton, OH | Leased | 125,000 | Manufacturing | |||||||||
| Oxted, England | Owned | 135,000 | Manufacturing | |||||||||
| Newport, AR | Leased | 111,300 | Manufacturing | |||||||||
| Cicero, IL | Owned | 45,000 | Manufacturing | |||||||||
| Cleveland, OH | Leased | 150,000 | Manufacturing | |||||||||
| Shanghai, China | Leased | 20,500 | Manufacturing | |||||||||
| (1) | ILS |
| (2) | Includes 11,000 square feet used by Park-Ohio’s corporate office. |
| (3) | Includes three leased properties with square footage of |
| (4) | Manufactured Products |
| Item 3. | Legal Proceedings |
We are subject to various pending and threatened lawsuits in which claims for monetary damages are asserted in the ordinary course of business. While any litigation involves an element of uncertainty, in the opinion of management, liabilities, if any, arising from currently pending or threatened litigation is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity or results of operations.
At December 31, 2005, we were a co-defendant in approximately 325 cases asserting claims on behalf of approximately 10,000 plaintiffs alleging personal injury as a result of exposure to asbestos. These asbestos cases generally relate to production and sale of asbestos-containing products and allege
12
various theories of liability, including negligence, gross negligence and strict liability and seek compensatory and, in some cases, punitive damages.
In every asbestos case in which we are named as a party, the complaints are filed against multiple named defendants. In substantially all of the asbestos cases, the plaintiffs either claim damages in excess of a specified amount, typically a minimum amount sufficient to establish jurisdiction of the court in which the case was filed (jurisdictional minimums generally range from $25,000 to $75,000), or do not specify the monetary damages sought. To the extent that any specific amount of damages is sought, the amount applies to claims against all named defendants.
There are only five asbestos cases, involving 22 plaintiffs, that plead specified damages. In each of the five cases, the plaintiff is seeking compensatory and punitive damages based on a variety of potentially alternative causes of action. In three cases, the plaintiff has alleged compensatory damages in the amount of $3.0 million for four separate causes of action and $1.0 million for another cause of action and punitive damages in the amount of $10.0 million. In another case, the plaintiff has alleged compensatory damages in the amount of $20.0 million for three separate causes of action and $5.0 million for another cause of action and punitive damages in the amount of $20.0 million. In the final case, the plaintiff has alleged compensatory damages in the amount of $0.41 million and punitive damages in the amount of $2.5 million.
Historically, we have been dismissed from asbestos cases on the basis that the plaintiff incorrectly sued one of our subsidiaries or because the plaintiff failed to identify any asbestos-containing product manufactured or sold by us or our subsidiaries. We intend to vigorously defend these asbestos cases, and believe we will continue to be successful in being dismissed from such cases. However, it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of asbestos-related lawsuits, claims and proceedings due to the unpredictable nature of personal injury litigation. Despite this uncertainty, and although our results of operations and cash flows for a particular period could be adversely affected by asbestos-related lawsuits, claims and proceedings, management believes that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company'sour financial condition, liquidity or results of operations. The Company hasAmong the factors management considered in reaching this conclusion were: (a) our historical success in being dismissed from these types of lawsuits on the bases mentioned above; (b) many cases have been named asimproperly filed against one of our subsidiaries; (c) in many cases , the plaintiffs have been unable to establish any causal relationship to us or our products or premises; (d) in many cases, the plaintiffs have been unable to demonstrate that they have suffered any identifiable injury or compensable loss at all, that any injuries that they have incurred did in fact result from alleged exposure to asbestos; and (e) the complaints assert claims against multiple defendants and, in asbestos-related personalmost cases, the damages alleged are not attributed to individual defendants. Additionally, we do not believe that the amounts claimed in any of the asbestos cases are meaningful indicators of our potential exposure because the amounts claimed typically bear no relation to the extent of the plaintiff’s injury, lawsuits. The Company'sif any.
Our cost of defending suchthese lawsuits has not been material to date and, based upon available information, our management of the Company does not expect the Company'sits future costs for asbestos-related lawsuits to have a material adverse effect on itsour results of operations, liquidity or financial condition. You can find more
information about our legal proceedings under Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERSposition.
| Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
Information required by this item has been omitted pursuant to General Instruction I of Form 10-K.
8
PART
13
Part II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED SECURITY HOLDER
MATTERS
| Item 5. | Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
The registrant is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. and has no equity securities that trade.
ITEM 6. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
| Item 6. | Selected Financial Data |
Information required by this item has been omitted pursuant to General Instruction I of Form 10-K.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The
| Item 7. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Our consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The historical financial information is not directly comparable on a year-to-yearyear-to-year basis, primarily due to the divestiturereversal of Kay Home Productsa tax valuation allowance in 2000, a fire at one2005, debt extinguishment costs and writeoff of deferred financing costs associated with the Company's
rubber plants in 2000,tender and early redemption during 2004 of our 9.25% senior subordinated notes, restructuring and unusual charges taken in 20012003 and 2002,2005, a goodwill impairment charge as of January 1,in 2002 to reflect the cumulative effect of an accounting change, and acquisitions and divestitures during the elimination of goodwill amortizationthree years ended December 31, 2005.
Executive Overview
We are an industrial supply chain logistics and diversified manufacturing business, operating in 2002. Goodwill amortization was $3.7 million in 2001 and $3.9 million in 2000.
OVERVIEW
The Company operates through three segments,segments: ILS, Aluminum Products and Manufactured Products. ILS is a leading supply chain logistics provider of
production components to large, multinational manufacturing companies, other
manufacturers and distributors. In connectionprovides customers with the supply of such production
components, ILS provides a variety of value-added, cost-effectiveintegrated supply chain management services.services for a broad range of high-volume, specialty production components. ILS customers receive various value-added services, such as engineering and design services, part usage and cost analysis, supplier selection, quality assurance, bar coding, product packaging and tracking,just-in-time and point-of use delivery, electronic billing and ongoing technical support. The principal customers of ILS are in the semiconductor
equipment, heavy-duty truck, industrialautomotive and vehicle parts, electrical distribution and controls, power sports/fitness equipment, HVAC, aerospace and defense, electrical controls, HVAC, vehicle partscomponents, appliance and accessories, appliances, and lawn
and gardensemiconductor equipment industries. Aluminum Products manufactures castcasts and machines aluminum engine, transmission, brake, suspension and other components such as pump housings, clutch retainers/pistons, control arms, knuckles, master cylinders, pinion housings, brake calipers, oil pans and flywheel spacers for automotive, agricultural equipment, construction equipment, heavy-duty truck and constructionmarine equipment manufacturers.OEMs, primarily on a sole-source basis. Aluminum Products also provides value-added services such as design and engineering machining and assembly. Manufactured Products operates a diverse group of niche manufacturing businesses that design and manufacture a broad range of high qualityhighly-engineered products engineeredincluding induction heating and melting systems, pipe threading systems, industrial oven systems, injection molded rubber components, and forged and machined products. Manufactured Products also produces and provides services and spare parts for specific customer applications.the equipment it manufactures. The principal customers of Manufactured Products are OEMs, sub-assemblers and end-usersend users in the steel, coatings, forging, foundry, heavy-duty truck, construction equipment, bottling, automotive, oil and gas, rail and locomotive manufacturing and aerospace automotive, steel, forging,
railroad, truck, oil, food processing and consumer appliancedefense industries. Between 1993Sales, earnings and 1999, the Company grew significantly, through both
internal growth and acquisitions. Over this period, the Company's net sales
increased at a 40% compounded annual growth, from $94.5 million to $717.2
million. Over the same period, income before income taxes increased from $3.9
million to $28.6 million.
Growth continued through the first half of 2000, but the Company's sales
volume and profitability dropped substantiallyother relevant financial data for these three segments are provided in the second half. First half
2000 net sales totaled $410.9 million, but dropped 16% to $343.8 million in the
second half. This decline was primarily dueNote K to the reduction of build rates in
the heavy-duty truck industry (the Company's largest customer segment) starting
in the third quarter, and a decline in orders received from customers in the
automotive industry (the Company's second largest customer segment).
The Company's sales volumesconsolidated financial statements.
Sales and profitability continued to decline during
2001, duegrow substantially in 2005, continuing the trend of the prior year, as the domestic and international manufacturing economies continued to overall weaknessgrow. Net sales increased 15% and net income increased 117% in 2005 compared to 2004. 2005 net income was affected by a $7.3 million reversal of the manufacturing economy, particularlytax valuation allowance and $1.8 million of restructuring charges ($.8 million reflected in the
heavy-duty truckCost of products sold and automotive industries. Despite these$1.0 million in Restructuring and impairment charges).
14
During 2004, net sales declines, the
Company believes it has retained or gained market share in most
9
major markets served. In 2001, the Company incurredincreased 30%, and net income was $14.5 million compared to a net loss of $25.4$11.5 in 2003.
During 2004, we reinforced our long-term availability and attractive pricing of funds by refinancing both of our major sources of borrowed funds: senior subordinated notes and our revolving credit facility. In November 2004, we sold $210.0 million which included $20.3of 8.375% senior subordinated notes due 2014. We used the net proceeds to fund the tender and early redemption of $199.9 million after-tax restructuring and impairment charges and
non-operating items.
The Company respondedof our 9.25% senior subordinated notes due 2007. We incurred debt extinguishment costs primarily related to this downturn by restructuring its businesses,
increasing specific prices and selling non-core manufacturing assets. The
restructuring included facility consolidations and closings, personnel
reductionspremiums and other transaction costs associated with the tender offer and early redemption and wrote off deferred financing costs totaling $6.0 million associated with the repurchased 9.25% senior subordinated notes.
In December 2004, we amended our revolving credit facility, extending its maturity so that it now expires in December 2010, increasing the credit limit so that we may borrow up to $200.0 million subject to an asset-based formula, and providing lower interest rate levels. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility are secured by substantially all our assets. We had approximately $48.2 million of unused borrowing availability at December 31, 2005. Funds provided by operations plus available borrowings under the revolving credit facility are expected to be adequate to meet our cash requirements.
At the end of December 2005, we acquired substantially all of the assets of Lectrotherm, which is primarily a provider of field service and spare parts for induction heating and melting systems, located in Canton, Ohio, for $5.1 million cash funded with borrowings under our revolving credit facility. This acquisition augments our existing, high-margin aftermarket induction business. Lectrotherm had no significant affect on 2005 earnings.
In July 2005, we acquired substantially all the assets of PPG, a provider of supply chain management services for a broad range of production components for $7.0 million cash funded with borrowings from our revolving credit facility, $.5 million in a short-term note payable and the assumption of approximately $13.3 million of trade liabilities. This acquisition added significantly to the customer and supplier bases, and expanded our geographic presence of our ILS segment. ILS has already eliminated substantial overhead cost reductions in selling and administrative departments
inbegun the process of consolidating redundant service centers.
We acquired substantially all business units. Despite customer pricing pressures,of the Company
negotiatedassets of the Amcast Components Group (“Amcast”), a producer of aluminum automotive products, on August 23, 2004 for $10.0 million cash and the assumption of approximately $9.0 million of operating liabilities. This acquisition significantly increased prices for several particularly low-marginthe sales and production capacity of our Aluminum Products business and added attractive new customers, product lines inand production technologies.
We acquired the Aluminum Productsremaining 66% of the common stock of Japan Ajax Magnethermic Company (“Jamco”), now a Japanese-located subsidiary of our induction heating and Manufactured Products segments. The
Company consolidated twenty logistics facilities and closed or sold eight
manufacturing facilities in 2001 and 2002. With regard to these actions,melting equipment business, on April 1, 2004 for cash existing on the Company recorded restructuring, impairment and unusual chargesbalance sheet of $28.5 million
in 2001 and $19.2 million in 2002. The 2002 charges included $8.3 million for
severance and exit costs, $5.6 million recorded in cost of products sold,
primarily to write down inventory of discontinued businesses and other product
lines to fair value, and $5.3 million for the impairment of property and
equipment and other long-term assets. The Company sold non-core manufacturing
assets, further detailed below. Management's actions are intended to position
the Company for increased profitability when the manufacturing economy
stabilizes and returns to growth.
The Company's actions resulted in increased profitability in 2002 compared
to 2001. Operating income was $16.6 million in 2002, after restructuring and
impairment charges of $19.2 million, compared to an operating loss of $3.9
million in 2001, after restructuring and impairment charges of $28.5 million and
goodwill amortization of $3.7 million.
The CompanyJamco at that date. We sold substantially all the assets of Castle Rubber Company
during the secondSt. Louis Screw and Green Bearing in first quarter of 2002,2003 for cash oftotaling approximately $2.5$7.3 million. The
Company acquired substantially all the assets of Ajax Magnethermic Corp. in the
third quarter of 2002, for cash of approximately $5.5 million.
The Company sold substantially all the assets of Cleveland City Forge in
the fourth quarter of 2001, for cash of approximately $6.1 million. During 2001,
the Company expensed $1.9 million of non-recurring business interruption costs,
caused by the June 2000 fire that destroyed the Cicero Flexible Products plant,
which were not covered by insurance.
Goodwill
In the second quarter of 2000, the Company sold substantially all the
assets of Kay Home Products for cash of approximately $9.2 million and recorded
a pretax loss of approximately $15.3 million.
On January 1, 2002, the Company adoptedaccordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill“Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" ("Assets” (“FAS 142"142”). Under FAS
142,, we review goodwill annually for potential impairment. This review was performed as of October 1, 2005, 2004 and intangible assets with indefinite lives are2003, using forecasted discounted cash flows, and it was determined that no longer
amortized, but are reviewed forfurther impairment annually, or more frequently if
impairment indicators arise. The Company reviewed itsis required.
At December 31, 2005, our balance sheet reflected $82.7 million of goodwill in the ILS and other
intangible assetsAluminum Products segments. In 2005, discount rates used ranged from 11.0% to 11.5%, and recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment chargelong-term revenue growth rates used ranged from 3.5% to 4.5%.
15
Results of $48.8
million, which was recorded as the cumulative effect of a changeOperations
| 2005 versus 2004 |
| Net Sales by Segment: |
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, | Acquired/ | |||||||||||||||||||
| Percent | (Divested) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | Change | Change | Sales | ||||||||||||||||
| ILS | $ | 532.6 | $ | 453.2 | $ | 79.4 | 18 | % | $ | 31.4 | ||||||||||
| Aluminum Products | 159.1 | 135.4 | 23.7 | 18 | % | 34.5 | ||||||||||||||
| Manufactured Products | 241.2 | 220.1 | 21.1 | 10 | % | 3.5 | ||||||||||||||
| Consolidated net sales | $ | 932.9 | $ | 808.7 | $ | 124.2 | 15 | % | $ | 69.4 | ||||||||||
Net sales increased by 15% in accounting
principle effective January 1, 2002. This charge will have no effect on the
future operating results of the Company. There was no goodwill amortization in
2002,2005 compared to $3.7 million in 2001 and $3.9 million in 2000.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
2002 versus 2001
Net2004. ILS sales declined by $1.9 million from $636.4 million in 2001 to $634.5
million in 2002. After excluding sales from Castle Rubber and Cleveland City
Forge in 2001 and 2002 and sales since the acquisition of Ajax Magnethermic,
sales increased $4.9 million. ILS net sales declined 5%, or $18.8 million, due
primarily to the sales volume reductions in heavy truck and other customer
industries. Aluminum Products net sales increased 25%, or $21.3 million, primarily due to the initiation or ramp-upJuly 20, 2005 acquisition of PPG, general economic growth, particularly as a result of significant growth in the heavy-duty truck industry, the addition of new production contracts.customers and increases in product range to existing customers. Aluminum Products sales increased in 2005 primarily due to sales from manufacturing plants acquired in August 2004 from the Amcast, partially offset by volume decreases in the automotive industry. Manufactured Products net sales declined 3%, or $4.4 million. After excluding
sales from Castle Rubberincreased in 2005 primarily in the induction equipment, pipe threading equipment and Cleveland City Forge in 2001 and 2002 and sales
sinceforging businesses. Of this increase, $3.5 million was due to the April 2004 acquisition of Ajax Magnethermic, sales increased $2.4 million, which
reflected increased customer demand.
10
the remaining 66% of the common stock of Jamco.
| Cost of Products Sold & Gross Profit: |
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
| Percent | ||||||||||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | Change | Change | |||||||||||||
| Consolidated cost of products sold | $ | 796.3 | $ | 682.6 | $ | 113.7 | 17 | % | ||||||||
| Consolidated gross profit | $ | 136.6 | $ | 126.1 | $ | 10.5 | 8 | % | ||||||||
| Gross margin | 14.6 | % | 15.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Cost of products sold was $546.9 millionincreased 17% in 2002, including inventory
write-downs of $5.6 million,2005 compared to cost of products sold of $552.3 million
in 2001, including inventory write-downs of $10.3 million. Inventory write-downs
included in cost of products sold primarily related to discontinued product
lines. Gross profit increased $3.5 million from $84.1 million in 2001 to $87.6
million in 2002. Gross margin increased to approximately 13.8% in 2002, from
13.2% in 2001. After inventory write-downs and the effect of the sales of Castle
Rubber in early 2002 and Cleveland City Forge in late 2001 and the acquisition
of Ajax Magnethermic in late 2002, gross profit increased $.5 million. After
these exclusions,2004, while gross margin declineddecreased to 14.7%14.6% from 15.6% in 2002 from 14.8% in 2001,
reflecting2004. ILS gross margin decreased margins in the ILSprimarily due to steel price increases and Manufactured Products segments,mix changes partially offset by increased marginsthe absence of the negative impact of $1.1 million in Aluminum Products. Declines in ILS and
Manufactured Products gross margins related primarily to reduced volumes
resulting in2004 of the absorptionbankruptcy of fixed operational overheads over a smaller sales
or production base. The increase incustomer, Murray, Inc. Aluminum Products gross margin relateddecreased due to new, higher-margin contracts, discontinuationthe addition of low margin contracts, cost
reductions, plant closuresthe lower-margin Amcast business, product mix and pricing changes and the absorptionincreased cost of fixed manufacturing overheads
overnatural gas. Gross margin in the Manufactured Products segment increased, primarily as a larger production base.
Selling, generalresult of increased sales and administrative ("SG&A") expenses decreased by 13%, or
$8.7 million, from $66.1 millionoverhead efficiencies achieved in 2001 to $57.4 million for 2002. This
decrease was primarilythe induction equipment, pipe threading equipment and forging businesses, and also due to cost reductions$.8 million writeoff of inventory associated with discontinued product lines.
| Selling, General & Administrative (“SG&A”) Expenses: |
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
| Percent | ||||||||||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | Change | Change | |||||||||||||
| Consolidated SG&A expenses | $ | 81.4 | $ | 76.7 | $ | 4.7 | 6 | % | ||||||||
| SG&A percent | 8.7 | % | 9.5 | % | ||||||||||||
Consolidated SG&A expenses increased by 6% in all three segments2005 compared to 2004. Approximately $3.6 million of the SG&A increase was due to acquisitions, primarily PPG, Amcast and Jamco, while bonus expenses of $1.4 million and charges relating to the Delphi and Dana bankruptcies totaling $1.2 million also contributed to the increase in SG&A expenses. The Company expects a further $.4 million negative impact to SG&A expenses in the first quarter of 2006 resulting from business restructuring initiatives implemented by the Company. During 2002,Dana bankruptcy. SG&A expenses were negatively affectedreduced in 2005 compared to 2004 by a decrease$.4 million increase in net pension credits of
$.8 million, reflecting less favorable investmentimproved returns on pension plan assets. ConsolidatedOther than these changes, SG&A expenses remained essentially flat, despite increased sales and production volumes. SG&A expenses as a percent of sales decreased by .8 of a percentage of net sales were 9.0% during
2002 as compared to 10.4% for 2001.point.
16
| Interest Expense: |
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
| Percent | ||||||||||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | Change | Change | |||||||||||||
| Interest expense | $ | 27.1 | $ | 31.4 | $(4.3 | ) | (14 | )% | ||||||||
| Debt extinguishment costs included in interest expense | -0- | $ | 6.0 | $(6.0 | ) | |||||||||||
| Average outstanding borrowings | $ | 357.1 | $ | 328.9 | $28.2 | 9 | % | |||||||||
| Average borrowing rate | 7.59 | % | 7.72 | % | (13) basis points | |||||||||||
Interest expense decreased by $3.5 million from $31.1 million in 20012005 compared to $27.6 million in 20022004, primarily due to lowerthe fourth quarter 2004 debt extinguishment costs. These costs primarily related to premiums and other transaction costs associated with the tender offer and early redemption and writeoff of deferred financing costs associated with the 9.25% senior subordinated notes. Excluding these 2004 costs, interest increased in 2005 due to higher average debt outstanding andborrowings, partially offset by lower average interest rates during 2002. For the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company
averaged outstanding2005. The increase in average borrowings of $333.6 million as compared to $353.4 million
for the prior year. The $19.8 million decrease in borrowings related2005 resulted primarily tofrom higher working capital reductionsrequirements and the purchase of Amcast Components Group and PPG in 2001, which were retained in 2002.August 2004 and July 2005, respectively. The lower average borrowing rate in 2005 was due primarily to the lower interest rate of 8.30%8.375% on our senior subordinated notes sold in November 2004 compared to the 9.25% interest rate on the senior subordinated notes outstanding during the first eleven months of 2004. The lower average borrowing rate in 2005 included increased interest rates under our revolving credit facility compared to 2004, which increased primarily as a result of actions by the Federal Reserve.
| Income Taxes: |
| Year Ended | ||||||||
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | |||||||
| Income before income taxes | $ | 27.3 | $ | 17.9 | ||||
| Income taxes (benefit) | $ | (4.3 | ) | $ | 3.4 | |||
| Reversal of tax valuation allowance included in 2005 income tax benefit | (7.3 | ) | ||||||
| 2005 Income taxes excluding reversal of tax valuation allowance | $ | 3.0 | ||||||
| Effective income tax rate | (16 | )% | 19 | % | ||||
| Effective income tax rate excluding reversal of tax valuation allowance | 11 | % | ||||||
In fourth quarter 2005, the Company reversed $7.3 million of its $12.3 million year-end 2005 domestic deferred tax valuation allowance. Based on strong recent and projected earnings, the Company has determined that it is more likely than not that this portion of the deferred tax asset will be realized. The tax valuation allowance reversal resulted in an increase to net income for the quarter. In 2006, the Company will begin recording a quarterly provision for federal income taxes, which is expected to result in a total effective income tax rate of approximately 40%. The Company’s significant net operating loss carry-forward should preclude the payment of cash federal income taxes in 2006 and 2007, and possibly beyond. In the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company will reassess the remaining tax valuation allowance. If it is determined that a portion or all of the remaining deferred tax asset will more likely than not be realized, then the appropriate portion of its remaining tax valuation allowance will be reversed into income at that time, which could increase 2006 net income by as much as $5.0 million.
We had income tax benefits of $4.3 million in 2005, including a $7.3 million reversal of our deferred tax asset valuation allowance. This was an effective income tax benefit rate of (16%). The provision for income taxes was $3.4 million in 2004, an effective income tax rate of 19%. Excluding the reversal of the $7.3 million tax valuation allowance, in 2005 we provided $3.0 million of income taxes, an 11% effective income tax rate. In both years, these taxes consisted primarily of state and foreign taxes on profitable operations. In neither year endeddid the income tax provision include federal income taxes. At December 31, 20022005, we had $41.0 million of net operating loss carryforwards for federal tax purposes. We are
17
presenting taxes and tax rates without the tax benefit of the tax valuation allowance reversal to facilitate comparison between the periods.
Results of Operations
| 2004 versus 2003 |
| Net Sales by Segment: |
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
| Percent | ||||||||||||||||
| 2004 | 2003 | Change | Change | |||||||||||||
| ILS | $ | 453.2 | $ | 377.6 | $ | 75.6 | 20 | % | ||||||||
| Aluminum Products | 135.4 | 90.1 | 45.3 | 50 | % | |||||||||||
| Manufactured Products | 220.1 | 156.6 | 63.5 | 41 | % | |||||||||||
| Consolidated net sales | $ | 808.7 | $ | 624.3 | $ | 184.4 | 30 | % | ||||||||
Net sales increased by 30% in 2004 compared to 2003. ILS sales increased due to general economic growth, in particular due to significant growth in the heavy-duty truck and semiconductor industries, the addition of new customers and increases in product range to existing customers. ILS growth was partially offset by a $1.0 million sales decrease related to the 2003 sale of Green Bearing. Aluminum Products 2004 sales increased $30.4 million due to the Amcast Components Group acquisition in August 2004, with additional growth from new contracts and increased volumes in the existing business. Manufactured Products sales increased primarily in the induction equipment, pipe threading equipment and forging businesses. Of this increase, $15.9 million was due to the second quarter 2004 acquisition of the remaining 66% of the common stock of Jamco, partially offset by the divestiture of St. Louis Screw in the first quarter of 2003.
| Cost of Products Sold & Gross Profit: |
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
| Percent | ||||||||||||||||
| 2004 | 2003 | Change | Change | |||||||||||||
| Consolidated cost of products sold | $ | 682.6 | $ | 527.6 | $ | 155.0 | 29 | % | ||||||||
| Consolidated gross profit | $ | 126.1 | $ | 96.7 | $ | 29.4 | 30 | % | ||||||||
| Gross margin | 15.6 | % | 15.5 | % | ||||||||||||
Cost of products sold increased 29% in 2004 compared to 2003, while gross margin increased to 15.6% from 15.5% in 2003. ILS gross margin decreased modestly, primarily due to steel price increases and mix changes and the negative impact of $1.1 million resulting from the bankruptcy of a significant customer, Murray, Inc. Aluminum Products gross margin decreased due to a combination of the addition of the lower-margin Amcast business, product mix and pricing changes and specific one-time costs incurred in 2004 for product startup, scrap and reserves. The $30.4 million of sales from the acquired Amcast business generated significantly lower margins than the existing Aluminum Products business. We expect margins at the acquired plants to increase over time as a result of post-acquisition cost reductions, price increases and new business. Gross margin in the Manufactured Products segment increased, primarily as a result of increased sales and overhead efficiencies achieved in the induction equipment, pipe threading equipment and forging businesses. Gross margins in both the Aluminum Products and Manufactured Products segments were negatively impacted by rising natural gas costs.
| SG&A Expenses: |
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
| Percent | ||||||||||||||||
| 2004 | 2003 | Change | Change | |||||||||||||
| Consolidated SG&A expenses | $ | 76.7 | $ | 62.4 | $ | 14.3 | 23 | % | ||||||||
| SG&A percent | 9.5 | % | 10.0 | % | ||||||||||||
18
Consolidated SG&A expenses increased by 23% in 2004 compared to 2003. Approximately $2.8 million of the SG&A increase was due to acquisitions, primarily Jamco and Amcast Components Group, while approximately $2.7 million of the increase was due to compliance costs associated with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The remainder of the SG&A increase was primarily due to increased sales and production volumes. Despite this increase, SG&A expenses as a percent of sales decreased by 50 basis points lower thandue both to cost reductions from restructuring and to the average rateabsorption of 8.80% for 2001,these expenses over increased sales. SG&A expenses were reduced in 2004 compared to 2003 by a $2.3 million increase in net pension credits reflecting improved returns on pension plan assets.
| Interest Expense: |
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
| Percent | ||||||||||||||||
| 2004 | 2003 | Change | Change | |||||||||||||
| Interest expense | $ | 31.4 | $ | 26.2 | $5.2 | 20 | % | |||||||||
| Debt extinguishment costs included in interest expense | $ | 6.0 | -0- | $6.0 | ||||||||||||
| Average outstanding borrowings | $ | 328.9 | $ | 320.8 | $8.1 | 3 | % | |||||||||
| Average borrowing rate | 7.72 | % | 8.17 | % | (45) basis points | |||||||||||
Interest expense increased in 2004 compared to 2003, primarily due to the fourth quarter 2004 debt extinguishment costs. These costs primarily related to premiums and other transaction costs associated with the tender and early redemption and writeoff of deferred financing costs associated with the 9.25% senior subordinated notes. Excluding these costs, interest decreased due to lower average interest rates in 2004, partially offset by higher average outstanding borrowings. The lower average borrowing rate in 2004 was due primarily to decreased rates on the Company'sour revolving credit facility. The increase in average borrowings in 2004 resulted primarily from higher working capital requirements.
| Income Taxes: |
The effective income tax rate for 2004 was 19%. Primarily foreign and certain state income taxes were provided for in both years because federal income taxes were not owed due to the recognition of net operating loss carry-forwards for which valuation allowances had been provided. At December 31, 2004, we had $47.7 million of net operating loss carry-forwards for federal tax purposes. We have not recognized any tax benefit for these loss carry-forwards. In accordance with the provision of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, ("FAS 109"), "Accounting“Accounting for Income Taxes," the Company” (“FAS 109”) recorded no tax benefit for the 20022003 net loss because itwe had incurred three years of cumulative losses. Income taxes of $.9 million were provided in 2002,2003, primarily for state and foreign taxes on profitable operations. The effective
tax rate for 2001 was 30.9%, which was less than the statutory rate due to the
amortization of non-deductible goodwill and other non-deductible items. At
December 31, 2002, subsidiaries of the Company had $25.6 million of net
operating loss carryforwards for federal tax purposes. The Company has not
recognized any tax benefit for these loss carryforwards.
2001 versus 2000
Net sales declined by $118.3 million, or 16%, from $754.7 million in 2000
to $636.4 million in 2001. Sales declined 14%, or $105.5 million, excluding the
$12.8 million from the divestiture of Kay Home Products. ILS net sales declined
14%, or $65.3 million, due primarily to the volume reductions in heavy truck and
other customer industries. Aluminum Products net sales decreased 24%, or $26.5
million. This included a $12.5 million decrease relating to the ending of
certain sales contracts which were anticipated, and $3.7 million relating to the
Company's decision to discontinue production of low-volume products, while the
remainder, $10.3 million, resulted from reductions in production releases for
ongoing automotive contracts. Manufactured Products net sales declined 16%, or
$26.4 million, of which $12.8 million related to the sale of Kay Home Products,
while the remainder, $13.6 million, reflected reduced customer demand.
Cost of products sold was $552.3 in 2001, including inventory write-downs
of $10.3 million, compared to cost of products sold of $627.2 million in 2000.
Inventory write-downs included in cost of products sold primarily related to
discontinued product lines. Gross profit declined $43.4 million from
11
$127.5 million in 2000 to $84.1 million in 2001. Gross margin declined from
16.9% in 2000 to 13.2% in 2001. After inventory write-downs gross profit
declined $33.1 million and gross margin declined to 14.8% in 2001, reflecting
decreased margins in all three segments. The decline in ILS gross margin related
to reduced volumes resulting in the absorption of fixed operational overheads
over a smaller sales base. For Aluminum Products, the decrease in gross margins
related to the absorption of fixed manufacturing overheads over a smaller
production base. The decrease in margins in the Manufactured Products segment
resulted from decreased production levels which absorbed fixed overhead costs
over a smaller production base, and from cost overruns on several large capital
equipment systems.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by 12% or $8.7
million, from $74.8 million in 2000 to $66.1 million for 2001. This decrease was
due to cost reductions in all three segments, plus $2.1 million from the
divestiture of Kay Home Products. During 2001, SG&A expenses were negatively
affected by a decrease in net pension credits of $.8 million, reflecting less
favorable investment returns on pension plan assets. Consolidated SG&A expenses
as a percentage of net sales were 10.4% during 2001 as compared to 9.9% for
2000.
Interest expense increased by $.3 million from $30.8 million in 2000 to
$31.1 million in 2001 due to higher average debt outstanding, partially offset
by lower average interest rates during 2001. For the year ended December 31,
2001, the Company averaged outstanding borrowings of $353.4 million as compared
to $342.4 million for the prior year. The $11.0 million increase related
primarily to higher working capital levels in the first half of the year. The
average borrowing rate of 8.80% for the year ended December 31, 2001 was 20
basis points lower than the average rate of 9.00% for 2000, primarily due to
decreased rates on the Company's revolving credit facility.
The effective income tax rate for 2001 was 31%, compared to 41% in 2000,
before considering the tax effect of the divestiture of Kay Home Products. This
decrease resulted from the tax-rate impact of permanent tax items such as
goodwill amortization given the pretax loss during 2001, as compared to a pretax
profit in 2000. At December 31, 2001, subsidiaries of the Company had $14.3
million of net operating loss carryforwards for federal tax purposes.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Critical Accounting Policies
Preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States ("GAAP")GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions which affect amounts reported in the
Company'sour consolidated financial statements. Management has made their best estimates and judgments of certain amounts included in the financial statements, giving due consideration to materiality. The Company doesWe do not believe that there is great likelihood that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions related to the accounting policies described below. However, application of these accounting policies involves the exercise of judgment and use of assumptions as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could differ from these estimates.
The Company does not have off-balance-sheet arrangements, financings or
other relationships with unconsolidated entities or other persons, also known as
special purpose entities. The Company currently uses no derivative instruments.
Revenue Recognition: The Company recognizes We recognize more than 95%90% of itsour revenue when title is transferred to unaffiliated customers, typically upon shipment. The Company'sOur remaining revenue, from long-term contracts, is recognized using the percentage of completion method of accounting. Selling prices are fixed based on purchase orders or contractual arrangements. The Company'sOur revenue recognition policies are in accordance with the SEC'sSEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB"(“SAB”) No. 101, "Revenue104, “Revenue Recognition."
”
Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts Receivable: Accounts receivable have been reduced by an allowance for amounts that may become uncollectible in the future. Allowances are developed by the
19
individual operating units based on historical losses, adjusting for economic conditions. The Company's
12
Our policy is to identify and reserve for specific collectibility concerns based on customers'customers’ financial condition and payment history. The establishment of reserves requires the use of judgment and assumptions regarding the potential for losses on receivable balances. Writeoffs of accounts receivable have historically been low.
Allowance for Obsolete and Slow Moving Inventory: Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value and have been reduced by an allowance for obsolete and slow-moving inventories. The estimated allowance is based on management'smanagement’s review of inventories on hand with minimal sales activity, over the
past twelve months, which is compared to estimated future usage and sales. Inventories identified by management as slow-moving or obsolete are reserved for based on estimated selling prices less disposal costs. Though the Company
considerswe consider these allowances adequate and proper, changes in economic conditions in specific markets in which the Company operateswe operate could have a material effect on reserve allowances required.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets: Long-lived assets are reviewed by management for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable. During 2005, 2003, 2002 and 2001, the Company decided to exit certain under-performing product lines and to close or consolidate certain operating facilities and, accordingly, recorded restructuring and impairment charges as discussed above and in Note LM to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein.
Restructuring: The Company recognizes We recognize costs in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3, "Liability“Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs incurred in a Restructuring)"” (“EITF 94-3”) and the SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 100, "Restructuring“Restructuring and Impairment Charges."Charges” for charges prior to 2003. Detailed contemporaneous documentation is maintained and updated on a quarterly basis to ensure that accruals are properly supported. If management determines that there is a change in the estimate, the accruals are adjusted to reflect the changes.
Goodwill: Through December 31, 2001, the Company amortized goodwill
primarily over forty years using the straight-line method.
The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard ("FAS")Standards No. 142 "Goodwill146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities” (“FAS 146”), which nullified EITF 94-3 and Other Intangible
Assets"requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized and measured initially at the fair value only when the liability is incurred. FAS 146 has no effect on charges recorded for exit activities begun prior to 2002.
Goodwill: We adopted FAS 142 as of January 1, 2002. Under FAS 142, the Company no longer amortizes
goodwill, but iswe are required to review goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently if impairment indicators arise.
The Company, with assistance of an outside consultant,
We completed the transitional impairment review of goodwill during the fourth quarter of 2002 and recorded a non-cash charge of $48.8 million. The charge has been reported as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. The Company hasWe have also completed the annual impairment test as of October 1, 2002,2005, 2004 and has2003 and have determined that no additional goodwill impairment existed as of that date.
those dates.
Deferred Income Tax Assets and Liabilities: The Company accounts We account for income taxes under the liability method, whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between the financial reporting and the tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the currently enacted tax rates. In determining these amounts, management determined the probability of realizing deferred tax assets, taking into consideration factors including historical operating results, expectations of future earnings and taxable income and the extended period of time over which the postretirement benefits will be paid.paid and accordingly records a tax valuation allowance if, based on the weight of available evidence it is more likely than not that some portion or all of our deferred tax assets will not be realized as required by FAS 109.
At December 31, 2002, the Company has2005, we had net operating loss carryforwardscarry-forwards for federal income tax purposes of approximately $25.6$41.0 million, which will expire inbetween 2021 or
2022. In accordance with the provisions of FAS 109 "Accounting for Income
Taxes", the tax benefits related to these carryforwards have been fully reserved
as of December 31, 2002 since the Company is in a three year cumulative loss
position.
and 2024.
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans: The Company We and itsour subsidiaries have pension plans, principally noncontributory defined benefit or noncontributory defined contribution plans and postretirementpostre-
20
tirement benefit plans covering substantially all employees. The measurement of liabilities related to these plans is based on management'smanagement’s assumptions related to future events, including interest rates, return on pension plan assets, rate of compensation increases, and health care cost trends. 13
Pension plan asset performance in the future will directly impact our net income of
the Company. The Company hasincome. We have evaluated itsour pension and other postretirement benefit assumptions, considering current trends in interest rates and market conditions and believes itsbelieve our assumptions are appropriate.
Other Matters: Transactions with related parties, primarily building
leases,
Environmental
We have been identified as a potentially responsible party at third-party sites under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, or comparable state laws, which provide for strict and, under certain circumstances, joint and several liability. We are participating in the ordinary coursecost of business, are conductedcertainclean-up efforts at several of these sites. However, our share of such costs has not been material and based on an arm's-length
basis, and areavailable information, our management does not expect our exposure at any of these locations to have a material adverse effect on its results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.
We have been named as one of many defendants in a number of asbestos-related personal injury lawsuits. Our cost of defending such lawsuits has not been material to the Company'sdate and, based upon available information, our management does not expect our future costs for asbestos-related lawsuits to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity or financial position, net incomecondition. We caution, however, that inherent in management’s estimates of our exposure are expected trends in claims severity, frequency and other factors that may materially vary as claims are filed and settled or cash flows.
SEASONALITY; VARIABILITY OF OPERATING RESULTS
The Company'sotherwise resolved.
Seasonality; Variability of Operating Results
Our results of operations are typically stronger in the first six months rather than the last six months of each calendar year due to scheduled plant maintenance in the third quarter to coincide with customer plant shutdowns and due to holidays in the fourth quarter.
The timing of orders placed by the Company'sour customers has varied with, among other factors, orders for customers'customers’ finished goods, customer production schedules, competitive conditions and general economic conditions. The variability of the level and timing of orders has, from time to time, resulted in significant periodic and quarterly fluctuations in the operations of the
Company'sour business units. Such variability is particularly evident at the capital equipment businesses, included in the Manufactured Products segment, which typically ship a few large systems per year.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Forward-Looking Statements
This annual report on Form 10-K contains certain statements that are "forward-looking
statements"“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Certain statements in this Management's DiscussionThe words “believes”, “anticipates”, “plans”, “expects”, “intends”, “estimates” and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations containsimilar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements including without limitation, discussion regarding
the Company's anticipated amounts of restructuring charges, credit availability,
levelsinvolve known and funding of capital expenditures and trends for 2003. Forward-looking
statements are necessarily subject tounknown risks, uncertainties and other factors many of which are outsidethat may cause our control, which could cause actual results, performance and achievements, or industry results, to differbe materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward looking statements. These uncertainties and other factors include, such things as:but are not limited to the following: our substantial indebtedness; general business conditions and competitive factors, including pricing pressures and product innovation; dependence on the automotive and heavy-duty truck industries, which are highly cyclical; demand for our products and services; raw material availability and pricing; component part availability and pricing; adverse changes in the our relationships with customers and suppliers; the financial condition of our customers, including the impact of any bankruptcies; our ability to successfully integrate recent and future acquisitions into existing operations; changes in general domestic economic conditions such as inflation rates, interest rates, tax rates and adverse impacts to us, our suppliers and customers from acts of terrorism or hostilities; our ability to meet various covenants, including financial covenants, contained in our revolving credit agreementfacility and the indenture governing the Senior Subordinated Notes;8.375% senior subordinated notes due 2014; increasingly stringent domestic
21
and foreign governmental regulations, including those affecting the environment; inherent uncertainties involved in assessing our potential liability for environmental remediation-related activities; the outcome of pending and future litigation and other claims, including, without limitation asbestos claims; dependence on the automotive and
heavy truck industries;our ability to negotiate acceptable contracts with labor unions; dependence on key management; and dependence on information systems.systems and the other factors we describe under the “Item 1A. Risk Factors”. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In light of these and other uncertainties, the inclusion of a forward-looking statement herein should not be regarded as a representation by us that our plans and objectives will be achieved.
14
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL DATA
| Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
We are exposed to market risk including changes in interest rates. We are subject to interest rate risk on our floating rate revolving credit facility, which consisted of borrowings of $128.3 million at December 31, 2005. A 100 basis point increase in the interest rate would have resulted in an increase in interest expense of approximately $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Our foreign subsidiaries generally conduct business in local currencies. During 2005, we recorded a favorable foreign currency translation adjustment of $.1 million related to net assets located outside the United States. This foreign currency translation adjustment resulted primarily from the weakening of the U.S. dollar in relation to the Canadian dollar. Our foreign operations are also subject to other customary risks of operating in a global environment, such as unstable political situations, the effect of local laws and taxes, tariff increases and regulations and requirements for export licenses, the potential imposition of trade or foreign exchange restrictions and transportation delays.
Our largest exposures to commodity prices relate to steel and natural gas price increases, which have increased significantly in 2005. We do not have any commodity swap agreements or hedge contracts for future increases in steel or natural gas prices.
22
| Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
| Page | ||||
| Report of | 24 | |||
| Report of Independent | 25 | |||
| Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | 26 | |||
| Consolidated Balance | 27 | |||
| Consolidated Statements of | 28 | |||
| Consolidated Statements of | 29 | |||
| Consolidated Statements of Cash | 30 | |||
| Notes to Consolidated Financial | 31 | |||
23
REPORT OF ERNSTMANAGEMENT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER
FINANCIAL REPORTING
The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Company’s management carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the last fiscal year. The framework on which such evaluation was based is contained in the report entitled “Internal Control — Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the “COSO Report”). Based upon the evaluation described above under the framework contained in the COSO Report, the Company’s management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2005. Management has identified no material weakness in internal control over financial reporting.
Ernst & YOUNGYoung LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the Company’s management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005. This attestation report is included at page 25 of this annual report on Form 10-K.
Park-Ohio Industries, Inc.
March 13, 2006
24
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORSREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholder
Park-Ohio Industries, Inc.
We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Park-Ohio Industries, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, management’s assessment that Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the accompanyingstandards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Park-Ohio
Holdings Corp.) as of December 31, 20022005 and 2001,2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholder'sshareholder’s equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002.2005 and our report dated March 13, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
 |
Cleveland, Ohio
March 13, 2006
25
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholder
Park-Ohio Industries, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholder’s equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company'sCompany’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted inof the United States.Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 20022005 and 20012004 and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20022005 in conformity with accounting
principlesU.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of thePark-Ohio Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in the United States.
As discussed in Note B toInternal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the consolidated financial statements, effective
January 1, 2002,Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Company changed its method of accounting for goodwill.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Treadway Commission and our report dated March 13, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
|
Cleveland, Ohio
February 25, 2003
16
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
March 13, 2006
26
Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
| December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||
ASSETS | |||||||||||
| Current Assets | |||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 17,868 | $ | 6,407 | |||||||
| Accounts receivable, less allowances for doubtful accounts of $5,120 in 2005 and $3,976 in 2004 | 153,502 | 145,475 | |||||||||
| Inventories | 190,553 | 177,294 | |||||||||
| Deferred tax assets | 8,627 | -0- | |||||||||
| Other current assets | 27,753 | 20,655 | |||||||||
| Total Current Assets | 398,303 | 349,831 | |||||||||
| Property, Plant and Equipment: | |||||||||||
| Land and land improvements | 6,964 | 6,788 | |||||||||
| Buildings | 38,384 | 36,217 | |||||||||
| Machinery and equipment | 198,019 | 185,489 | |||||||||
| 243,367 | 228,494 | ||||||||||
| Less accumulated depreciation | 127,136 | 118,613 | |||||||||
| 116,231 | 109,881 | ||||||||||
| Other Assets: | |||||||||||
| Goodwill | 82,703 | 82,565 | |||||||||
| Net assets held for sale | -0- | 1,035 | |||||||||
| Other | 70,617 | 68,535 | |||||||||
| $ | 667,854 | $ | 611,847 | ||||||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY | |||||||||||
| Current Liabilities | |||||||||||
| Trade accounts payable | $ | 115,396 | $ | 108,862 | |||||||
| Accrued expenses | 68,313 | 59,745 | |||||||||
| Current portion of long-term liabilities | 4,161 | 5,812 | |||||||||
| Total Current Liabilities | 187,870 | 174,419 | |||||||||
| Long-Term Liabilities, less current portion 8.375% senior subordinated notes due 2014 | 210,000 | 210,000 | |||||||||
| Revolving credit | 128,300 | 120,600 | |||||||||
| Other long-term debt | 6,705 | 4,776 | |||||||||
| Deferred tax liability | 3,176 | 1,074 | |||||||||
| Other postretirement benefits and other long-term liabilities | 26,174 | 26,496 | |||||||||
| 374,355 | 362,946 | ||||||||||
| Shareholder’s Equity | |||||||||||
| Common stock, par value $1 a share | -0- | -0- | |||||||||
| Additional paid-in capital | 64,844 | 64,844 | |||||||||
| Retained earnings | 42,887 | 11,314 | |||||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (2,102 | ) | (1,676 | ) | |||||||
| 105,629 | 74,482 | ||||||||||
| $ | 667,854 | $ | 611,847 | ||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
17
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
27
Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||
| Net sales | $ | 932,900 | $ | 808,718 | $ | 624,295 | ||||||||
| Cost of products sold | 796,283 | 682,658 | 527,586 | |||||||||||
| Gross profit | 136,617 | 126,060 | 96,709 | |||||||||||
| Selling, general and administrative expenses | 81,368 | 76,714 | 62,369 | |||||||||||
| Restructuring and impairment charges | 943 | -0- | 18,808 | |||||||||||
| Operating income | 54,306 | 49,346 | 15,532 | |||||||||||
| Interest expense | 27,056 | 31,413 | 26,151 | |||||||||||
| Income (loss) before income taxes | 27,250 | 17,933 | (10,619 | ) | ||||||||||
| Income taxes (benefit) | (4,323 | ) | 3,400 | 904 | ||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | 31,573 | $ | 14,533 | $ | (11,523 | ) | |||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
18
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
28
Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Shareholder’s Equity
| Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Additional | Comprehensive | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Common | Paid-In | Retained | Income | ||||||||||||||||||
| Stock | Capital | Earnings | (Loss) | Total | |||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at January 1, 2003 | $ | -0- | $ | 64,844 | $ | 8,304 | $ | (8,096 | ) | $ | 65,052 | ||||||||||
| Comprehensive (loss): | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Net Loss | (11,523 | ) | (11,523 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | 3,632 | 3,632 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Minimum pension liability | 1,200 | 1,200 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive (loss) | (6,691 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2003 | -0- | 64,844 | (3,219 | ) | (3,264 | ) | 58,361 | ||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive income (loss): | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | 14,533 | 14,533 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | 2,071 | 2,071 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Minimum pension liability | (483 | ) | (483 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive income | 16,121 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2004 | -0- | 64,844 | 11,314 | (1,676 | ) | 74,482 | |||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive income (loss): | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | 31,573 | 31,573 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | 94 | 94 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Minimum pension liability | (520 | ) | (520 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive income | 31,147 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2005 | $ | -0- | $ | 64,844 | $ | 42,887 | $ | (2,102 | ) | $ | 105,629 | ||||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
19
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
29
Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||
| OPERATING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | 31,573 | $ | 14,533 | $ | (11,523 | ) | |||||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operations: | ||||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 17,261 | 15,385 | 15,479 | |||||||||||
| Restructuring and impairment charges | 1,776 | -0- | 18,641 | |||||||||||
| Deferred income taxes | (6,525 | ) | 1,074 | -0- | ||||||||||
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities excluding acquisitions of businesses: | ||||||||||||||
| Accounts receivable | 5,507 | (35,606 | ) | 539 | ||||||||||
| Inventories | (1,699 | ) | (26,541 | ) | 6,991 | |||||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued expenses | (934 | ) | 39,400 | (12,160 | ) | |||||||||
| Other | (12,464 | ) | (7,331 | ) | (6,149 | ) | ||||||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 34,495 | 914 | 11,818 | |||||||||||
| INVESTING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||||||||
| Purchases of property, plant and equipment, net | (20,295 | ) | (9,963 | ) | (10,869 | ) | ||||||||
| Costs of acquisitions, net of cash acquired | (12,181 | ) | (9,997 | ) | -0- | |||||||||
| Proceeds from the sale of business units or assets held for sale | 1,100 | -0- | 7,340 | |||||||||||
| Net cash used by investing activities | (31,376 | ) | (19,960 | ) | (3,529 | ) | ||||||||
| FINANCING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from bank arrangements, net | 8,342 | 18,013 | 112,000 | |||||||||||
| Payments on long-term debt | -0- | (199,930 | ) | (126,898 | ) | |||||||||
| Issuance of 8.375% senior subordinated notes, net of deferred financing costs | -0- | 205,179 | -0- | |||||||||||
| Net cash provided (used) by financing activities | 8,342 | 23,262 | (14,898 | ) | ||||||||||
| Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 11,461 | 4,216 | (6,609 | ) | ||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 6,407 | 2,191 | 8,800 | |||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | $ | 17,868 | $ | 6,407 | $ | 2,191 | ||||||||
| Income taxes paid (refunded) | $ | 881 | $ | 3,370 | $ | (1,038 | ) | |||||||
| Interest paid | 24,173 | 28,891 | 25,213 | |||||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
20
30
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER
December 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
2005, 2004 and 2003
(Dollars in thousands)
NOTE A -- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
— Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.) and all of its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.
Accounting Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash Equivalents: The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
Inventories: Inventories are stated at the lower offirst-in, first-out (FIFO) cost (principally the
first-in, first-out method for approximately 85% of its inventories and last-in,
first-out for the remainder) or market value. If the first-in, first-out method
of inventory accounting had been used exclusively by the Company, inventories
would have been approximately $4,500 higher than reportedInventory reserves were $19,166 and $18,604 at December 31, 20022005 and 2001.
Major Classes of Inventories
2004, respectively.
| Major Classes of Inventories |
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | |||||||
| Finished goods | $ | 128,465 | $ | 121,832 | ||||
| Work in process | 32,547 | 27,959 | ||||||
| Raw materials and supplies | 29,541 | 27,503 | ||||||
| $ | 190,553 | $ | 177,294 | |||||
Property, Plant and Equipment: Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost. Major additionsAdditions and associated interest costs are capitalized and
betterments are charged to accumulated depreciation; expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to operations. Depreciation of fixed assets is computed principally by the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the assets.assets ranging from 25-60 years for buildings, and3-16 years for machinery and equipment. The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in business conditions indicate that their full carrying value may not be recoverable (See Note L)M).
Goodwill: As discussed in Note B, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 ("(“FAS 142"142”) "Goodwill, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,"” as of January 1, 2002. Under FAS 142, goodwill is no longer amortized but is subject to impairment testing.testing at least annually on October 1. Prior to 2002, goodwill was amortized primarily over forty40 years using the straight-line method.
Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits: The Company and its subsidiaries have pension plans, principally noncontributory defined benefit or noncontributory defined contribution plans, covering substantially all employees. In addition, the Company has two unfunded postretirement benefit plans. For the defined benefit plans, benefits are based on the employee'semployee’s years of service and the Company's policy is to fund that amount recommended by its
independent actuaries.service. For the defined contribution plans, the costs charged to operations and the amount funded are based upon a percentage of the covered employees'employees’ compensation.
Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations: Due to thelong-term productive nature of the Company’s manufacturing operations, absent plans or expectations of plans to initiate asset retirement activities, the Company is unable to determine potential settlement dates to be used in fair value
31
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
calculations for estimating conditional asset retirement obligations. As such, the Company has not recognized conditional asset retirement obligations when there are no plans or expectations of plans to undertake a major renovation or demolition project that would require the removal of asbestos.
Income Taxes: The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method, whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between the financial reporting and the tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the current enacted tax 21
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
rates. In determining these amounts, management determined the probability of realizing deferred tax assets, taking into consideration factors including historical operating results, expectations of future earnings, and taxable income and the extended period of time over which the postretirement benefits will be paid (See Note F).
and accordingly records valuation allowances if, based on the weight of available evidence it is more likely than not that some portion or all of our deferred tax assets will not be realized as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 (“FAS 109”), “Accounting for Income Taxes.”
Revenue Recognition: The Company recognizes revenue, other than from long-term contracts, when title is transferred to the customer, typically upon shipment. Revenue from long-term contracts (less than 5%10% of consolidated revenue) is accounted for under the percentage of completion method, and recognized on the basis of the percentage each contract'scontract’s cost to date bears to the total estimated contract cost. Revenue earned on contracts in process in excess of billings is classified in other current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The Company'sCompany’s revenue recognition policies are in accordance with the SEC'sSEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB"(“SAB”) No. 101, "Revenue104, “Revenue Recognition."
”
Accounts Receivable: Accounts receivable are recorded at selling price, which is fixed based on a purchase order or contractual arrangement. Accounts receivable are reduced by an allowance for amounts that may become uncollectible in the future. The Company'sCompany’s policy is to identify and reserve for specific collectibility concerns based on customers'customers’ financial condition and payment history.
Software Development Costs: Software development costs incurred subsequent to establishing feasibility through the general release of the software products are capitalized and included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheet. Technological feasibility is demonstrated by the completion of a working model. All costs prior to the development of the working model are expensed as incurred. Capitalized costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over five years, which is the estimated useful life of the software product.
Concentration of Credit Risk: The Company sells its products to customers in diversified industries. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers'customers’ financial condition but does not require collateral to support customer receivables. The Company establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon factors surrounding the credit risk of specific customers, historical trends and other information. Write-offs of accounts receivable have
historically been low. As of December 31, 2002,2005, the Company had uncollateralized receivables with sevensix customers in the automotive and heavy-duty truck industries, each with several locations, aggregating $28,711,$42,579, which represented approximately 27%28% of the Company'sCompany’s trade accounts receivable. During 2002,2005, sales to these customers amounted to approximately $208,193,$255,114, which represented 33%approximately 27% of the Company'sCompany’s net sales.
Shipping and Handling Costs: All shipping and handling costs are included in cost of products sold in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Environmental: The Company accrues environmental costs related to existing conditions resulting from past or current operations and from which no current or future benefit is discernible. Costs whichthat extend the life of the related property or mitigate or prevent future environmental contamination are capitalized. The Company records a liability when environmental assessments and/or remedial efforts are probable and can be reasonably estimated. The estimated liability of the Company is not discounted or reduced for possible recoveries from insurance carriers.
32
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
Foreign Currency Translation: The functional currency for all subsidiaries outside the United States is the local currency. Financial statements for these subsidiaries are translated into United StatesU.S. dollars at year-end exchange rates as to assets and liabilities and weighted-average exchange rates as to revenues and expenses. The resulting translation adjustments are recorded in shareholders'shareholder’s equity.
Impact of Other Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements: In October
2001, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144,
"Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" ("FAS 144"),
which supersedes FAS 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of." Although retaining many of the
fundamental impairment and measurement provisions of FAS 121, the new rules
supersede the provisions of APB Opinion 30 with regard to reporting the effects
of a disposal of a segment of a business. The adoption of this standard by the
Company on January 1, 2002 did not impact the Company's financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
In April 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 145, "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44
and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections," ("FAS
145"). FAS 145 rescinds FAS 4 and FAS 64 related to classification of gains and
losses on debt extinguishment such that most debt extinguishment gains and
22
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
losses will no longer be classified as extraordinary. FAS 145 also amends FAS 13
with respect to sales-leaseback transactions. The Company adopted the provisions
of FAS 145 effective April 1, 2002, and the adoption had no impact on the
Company's reported results of operations or financial position.
In June 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with
Exit or Disposal Activities," ("FAS 146"), which addresses financial accounting
and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal of activities and
nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Issue No. 94-3, "Liability
Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an
Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)." FAS 146
requires that a liability for a cost that is associated with an exit or disposal
activity be recognized when a legal liability is incurred. FAS 146 also
establishes that fair value is the objective for the initial measurement of the
liability. FAS 146 is effective for exit and disposal activities that are
initiated after December 31, 2002. It is currently the Company's policy to
recognize restructuring costs in accordance with EITF Issue No. 94-3.
In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
Interpretation No. 45 ("FIN 45"), "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure
Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of
Others". FIN 45 elaborates on required disclosures by a guarantor in its
financial statements about obligations under certain guarantees that it has
issued and requires a guarantor to recognize, at the inception of certain
guarantees, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in
issuing the guarantee. The Company is reviewing the provisions of FIN 45
relating to initial recognition and measurements of guarantor liabilities, which
are effective for qualifying guarantees entered into or modified after December
31, 2002, but does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on the
consolidated financial statements. The Company adopted the new disclosure
requirements for the year ended December 31, 2002.
Reclassification: Certain amounts in the prior years'years’ financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
NOTE B -- ADOPTION OF— FAS 142, "GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS"
Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted FAS 142, "Goodwill“Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets." Under this standard, goodwill is no longer amortized, but is
subject to an impairment test at least annually. The Company has selected
October 1 as its annual testing date. In the year of adoption, FAS 142 also
requires the Company to perform a transitional test to determine whether
goodwill was impaired as of the beginning of the year. Under FAS 142, the
initial step in testing for goodwill impairment is to compare the fair value of
each reporting unit to its book value. To the extent the fair value of any
reporting unit is less than its book value, which would indicate that potential
impairment of goodwill exists, a second test is required to determine the amount
of impairment.
The Company, with assistance of an outside consultant, completed the
transitional impairment review of goodwill during the fourth quarter of 2002
using a discounted cash flow approach to determine the fair value of each
reporting unit. Based upon the results of these calculations, the Company
recorded a non-cash charge for goodwill impairment which aggregated $48,799.Assets”
In accordance with the provisions of FAS 142, the chargeCompany has been accounted for as
a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, retroactive to January
1, 2002. The Company also completed theits annual goodwill impairment testtests as of October 1, 2002,2005, 2004 and 2003, and has determined that no additional impairment of goodwill existed as of that date.
23
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUEDthose dates.
The following table summarizes the transitional goodwill impairment charge
by reporting segment as well as the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the yearyears ended December 31, 2002.
In accordance with FAS 142, prior period amounts have not been restated.2005 and December 31, 2004 by reporting segment.
| Reporting | Goodwill at | Goodwill at | ||||||
| Segment | December 31, 2005 | December 31, 2004 | ||||||
| ILS | $ | 66,188 | $ | 66,050 | ||||
| Aluminum Products | 16,515 | 16,515 | ||||||
| $ | 82,703 | $ | 82,565 | |||||
The following table summarizesincrease in the reportedgoodwill in the ILS segment during 2005 results for 2001 and 2000, and the
results that would have been reported had the non-amortization provisions of FAS
142 been in effect for those years.
from foreign currency fluctuations.
NOTE C -- ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS— Acquisitions
On September 10, 2002,December 23, 2005, the Company acquired substantially allcompleted the acquisition of the assets of Ajax Magnethermic Corporation ("Ajax"Lectrotherm, Inc. (“Lectrotherm”), a manufacturer of induction heating
and melting equipment. for $5,125 in cash. The acquisition was funded with borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility. The purchase price of approximately $5.5 million and the results of operations of AjaxLectrotherm prior to its date of acquisition were not deemed significant as defined in Regulation S-X. The results of operations for Lectrotherm have been included since December 23, 2005. The preliminary allocation of the purchase price has been performed based on the assignments of fair values to assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The allocation of the purchase price is as follows:
| Cash acquisition price, less cash acquired | $ | 4,698 | |||
| Assets | |||||
| Accounts receivable | (2,640 | ) | |||
| Inventories | (954 | ) | |||
| Prepaid expenses | (97 | ) | |||
| Equipment | (871 | ) | |||
| Other assets | (545 | ) | |||
| Liabilities | |||||
| Accrued expenses | 409 | ||||
| Goodwill | $ | -0- | |||
On April 26, 2002,July 20, 2005, the Company completed the saleacquisition of the assets of Purchased Parts Group, Inc. (“PPG”) for $7,000 in cash, $483 in a short-term note payable and the assumption of approximately $13,255 of trade liabilities. The acquisition was funded with borrowings under the Company’s revolving
33
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
credit facility. The purchase price and the results of operations of PPG prior to its date of acquisition were not deemed significant as defined in Regulation S-X. The results of operations for PPG have been included since July 20, 2005. The preliminary allocation of the purchase price is as follows:
| Cash acquisition price | $ | 7,000 | |||
| Assets | |||||
| Accounts receivable | (10,894 | ) | |||
| Inventories | (10,606 | ) | |||
| Prepaid expenses | (1,201 | ) | |||
| Equipment | (407 | ) | |||
| Liabilities | |||||
| Accounts payable | 13,255 | ||||
| Accrued expenses | 2,370 | ||||
| Note payable | 483 | ||||
| Goodwill | $ | -0- | |||
The Company has a plan for integration activities. In accordance with FASB EITF Issue No. 95-3, “Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination,” the Company recorded accruals for severance, exit and relocation costs in the purchase price allocation. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending accrual balance is as follows:
| Severance | Exit and | |||||||||||
| and Personnel | Relocation | Total | ||||||||||
| Balance at June 30, 2005 | $ | -0- | $ | -0- | $ | -0- | ||||||
| Add: Accruals | 250 | 1,750 | 2,000 | |||||||||
| Less: Payments | (551 | ) | (594 | ) | (1,145 | ) | ||||||
| Transfers | 400 | (400 | ) | -0- | ||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2005 | $ | 99 | $ | 756 | $ | 855 | ||||||
On August 23, 2004, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of Castle Rubber Company forthe Automotive Components Group (“Amcast Components Group”) of Amcast Industrial Corporation. The purchase price was approximately $10,000 in cash and the assumption of approximately $2.5 million.
Castle Rubber, a non-core business is$9,000 of operating liabilities. The acquisition was funded with borrowings under the Manufactured Products Segment, had
been identified as a business the Company was discontinuing as part of its
restructuring activities during 2001.
On December 21, 2001, the Company completed the sale of substantially all
of the assets of Cleveland City Forge for cash of approximately $6.1 million and
recorded a gain of approximately $.1 million. Cleveland City Forge was a
non-core business in the Manufactured Products Segment, producing clevises and
turnbuckles for the construction industry.
On September 30, 2000, the Company acquired IBM's plant automation software
product lines and related assets for cash of approximately $3.9 million.Company’s revolving credit facility. The transaction has been accounted for as a purchase price and the results of operations of Amcast Components Group prior to theits date of acquisition were not deemed to be significant as defined in Regulation S-X.
On June 30, 2000, The results of operations for Amcast Components Group have been included in the Company completed the sale of substantially allCompany’s results since August 23, 2004.
The final allocation of the purchase price has been performed based on the assignment of fair values to assets of Kay Home Products for cash of approximately $9.2 millionacquired and recorded a loss of approximately $15.3 million, which is included in
non-operating items, net in the consolidated statement of operations. Kay Home
Products was a non-core business producing and distributing barbecue grills,
tray tables, screen houses and plant stands.
24
liabilities assumed.
34
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
— Continued
The allocation of the purchase price is as follows:
| Cash acquisition price | $ | 10,000 | |||
| Assets | |||||
| Accounts receivable | (8,948 | ) | |||
| Inventories | (2,044 | ) | |||
| Property and equipment | (15,499 | ) | |||
| Other | (115 | ) | |||
| Liabilities | |||||
| Accounts payable | 4,041 | ||||
| Compensation accruals | 3,825 | ||||
| Other accruals | 8,740 | ||||
| Goodwill | $ | -0- | |||
The Company has a plan for integration activities and plant rationalization. In accordance with FASB EITF Issue No. 95-3, the Company recorded accruals for severance, exit and relocation costs in the purchase price allocation. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending accrual balances is as follows:
| Severance | Exit | Relocation | Total | |||||||||||||
| Balance at June 30, 2004 | $ | -0- | $ | -0- | $ | -0- | $ | -0- | ||||||||
| Add: Accruals | 1,916 | 100 | 265 | 2,281 | ||||||||||||
| Less: Payments | 295 | -0- | 2 | 297 | ||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2004 | 1,621 | 100 | 263 | 1,984 | ||||||||||||
| Transfer | 0 | 48 | (48 | ) | 0 | |||||||||||
| Adjustments | (612 | ) | 0 | (113 | ) | (725 | ) | |||||||||
| Less: Payments | 1,009 | 148 | 102 | 1,259 | ||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2005 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||
On April 1, 2004, the Company acquired the remaining 66% of the common stock of Japan Ajax Magnethermic Company (“Jamco”) for cash existing on the balance sheet of Jamco at that date. No additional purchase price was paid by the Company. The purchase price and the results of operations of Jamco prior to its date of acquisition were not deemed significant as defined in Regulation S-X. The results of operations for Jamco have been included in the Company’s results since April 1, 2004.
35
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
NOTE D -- ACCRUED EXPENSES— Other Assets
Other assets consists of the following:
| December 31, | |||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||
| Pension assets | $ | 47,164 | $ | 41,295 | |||||
| Idle assets | 5,161 | 6,040 | |||||||
| Deferred financing costs | 7,048 | 7,846 | |||||||
| Tooling | 3,327 | 3,570 | |||||||
| Software development costs | 2,485 | 3,390 | |||||||
| Other | 5,432 | 6,394 | |||||||
| Totals | $ | 70,617 | $ | 68,535 | |||||
NOTE E — Accrued Expenses
Accrued expenses include the following:
| December 31, | |||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||
| Accrued salaries, wages and benefits | $ | 16,435 | $ | 14,098 | |||||
| Advance billings | 21,969 | 10,059 | |||||||
| Warranty, project and installation accruals | 4,391 | 5,660 | |||||||
| Severance and exit costs | 1,451 | 2,175 | |||||||
| Interest payable | 2,900 | 2,022 | |||||||
| State and local taxes | 4,866 | 4,553 | |||||||
| Sundry | 16,301 | 21,178 | |||||||
| Totals | $ | 68,313 | $ | 59,745 | |||||
Substantially all advance billings and warranty, project and installation accruals relate to the Company'sCompany’s capital equipment businesses. The 2002 increase in
accrued expenses was primarily due to the acquisition of Ajax Magnethermic.
The changes in the aggregate product warranty liability are as follows for the year ended December 31, 20022005 and 2001:
2004:
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | |||||||
| Balance at beginning of year | $ | 4,281 | $ | 5,614 | ||||
| Claims paid during the year | (3,297 | ) | (4,708 | ) | ||||
| Additional warranties issued during year | 2,593 | 2,874 | ||||||
| Acquired warranty liabilities | -0- | 501 | ||||||
| Other | (11 | ) | -0- | |||||
| Balance at end of year | $ | 3,566 | $ | 4,281 | ||||
The acquired warranty liability during 2004 reflects the warranty liability of Jamco, which was acquired in April 2004.
36
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
NOTE E -- FINANCING ARRANGEMENTSF — Financing Arrangements
Long-term debt consists of the following:
| December 31, | |||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||
| 8.375% senior subordinated notes due 2014 | $ | 210,000 | $ | 210,000 | |||||
| Revolving credit maturing on December 31, 2010 | 128,300 | 120,600 | |||||||
| Industrial development revenue bonds maturing in 2012 at interest rates from 2.00% to 4.15% | 3,586 | 4,041 | |||||||
| Other | 4,763 | 3,666 | |||||||
| 346,649 | 338,307 | ||||||||
| Less current maturities | 1,644 | 2,931 | |||||||
| Total | $ | 345,005 | $ | 335,376 | |||||
Maturities of long-term debt during each of the five years following December 31, 20022005 are approximately $1,306 in 2003, $114,985 in 2004, $925 in
2005, $930$1,644 in 2006, $2,019 in 2007, $827 in 2008, $646 in 2009 and $200,876$130,471 in 2010.
In November 2004, the Company issued $210,000 of 8.375% senior subordinated notes due November 15, 2014 (“8.375% Notes”). The net proceeds from this debt issuance were approximately $205,178 net of underwriting and other debt offering fees. Proceeds from the 8.375% Notes were used to fund the tender offer and early redemption of the Company’s 9.25% senior subordinated notes due 2007. 25
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUEDThe Company incurred debt extinguishment costs related primarily to premiums and other transaction costs associated with the tender and early redemption and wrote off deferred financing costs associated with the 9.25% senior subordinated notes totaling $5,963 or $.53 per share on a diluted basis.
The Company is a party to a credit and security agreement dated December
31, 2000,November 5, 2003, as amended ("(“Credit Agreement"Agreement”), with a group of banks, under which it may borrow or issue standby letters of credit or commercial letters of credit up to $160 million.$200,000. During 2004, the Credit Agreement was amended to extend the maturity to December 31, 2010 and increase the credit line to $200,000. The amended credit agreement provides lower interest rate brackets and modified certain covenants to provide greater flexibility. The Credit Agreement currently contains a detailed borrowing base formula whichthat provides borrowing capacity to the Company based on negotiated percentages of eligible accounts receivable, inventory and fixed assets. At December 31, 2002,2005, the Company had approximately $33.0 million$48,335 of unused borrowing capacity available under the Credit Agreement. Interest is payable quarterly at either the bank'sbank’s prime lending rate plus .5%-1.5% (5.25%(7.25% at December 31, 2002)2005) or, at Park-Ohio'sthe Company’s election, at LIBOR plus 2.75%-3.50%.75% to 2.25%. The Company'sCompany’s ability to elect LIBOR-based interest rates as well as the overall interest rate are dependent on the Company's ratio of senior funded indebtedness
to pro forma earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
("EBITDA"),Company’s Debt Service Coverage Ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement, and adjusted every quarter. As
of December 31, 2002, the Company was limited to prime-based borrowings.Agreement. Up to $7.0 million$20,000 in standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit may be issued under the Credit Agreement. In addition to the bank's customary letter
of credit fees, a 3/4% fee is assessed on standby letters of credit on an annual
basis. As of December 31, 2002,2005, in addition to amounts borrowed under the Credit Agreement, there is $2.3 millionwas $12,519 outstanding primarily for standby letters of credit. AAn annual fee of .25% to .50% is imposed by the bank on the unused portion of available borrowings. The Credit Agreement expires on June 30, 2004December 31, 2010 and borrowings are secured by substantially all of the Company'sCompany’s assets. At December 31, 2005, the Company also had an operating lease line of credit available of approximately $9,300.
A foreign subsidiary of the Company had outstanding standby letters of credit of $5,156 at December 31, 2005 under its credit arrangement.
The 8.375% Notes are general unsecured senior subordinated obligations of the Company and are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several basis by all domestic subsidiaries of the
37
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
Company. Provisions of the indenture governing the Senior Subordinated8.375% Notes and the revolving credit agreementCredit Agreement contain restrictions on the Company'sCompany’s ability to incur additional indebtedness, to create liens or other encumbrances, to make certain payments, investments, loans and guarantees and to sell or otherwise dispose of a substantial portion of assets or to merge or consolidate with an unaffiliated entity. The Credit Agreement also requires maintenance of specific
financial ratios. At December 31, 2002,2005, the Company was in compliance with all financial covenants of the credit agreement.Credit Agreement.
The weighted average interest rate on all debt was 7.69%7.35% at December 31, 2002.
The fair market value of the Senior Subordinated Notes based on published
market prices was approximately $129,955 and $122,957 at December 31, 2002 and
2001, respectively.2005.
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and borrowings under the credit agreementCredit Agreement and the 8.375% Notes approximate fair value at December 31, 20022005 and 2001.
2004.
NOTE F -- INCOME TAXESG — Income Taxes
Income taxes consisted of the following:
26
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||
| Current payable (benefit): | |||||||||||||
| Federal | $ | 165 | $ | (426 | ) | $ | -0- | ||||||
| State | 198 | 23 | 16 | ||||||||||
| Foreign | 2,260 | 3,245 | 888 | ||||||||||
| 2,623 | 2,842 | 904 | |||||||||||
| Deferred: | |||||||||||||
| Federal | (7,300 | ) | -0- | -0- | |||||||||
| State | -0- | -0- | -0- | ||||||||||
| Foreign | 354 | 558 | -0- | ||||||||||
| (6,946 | ) | 558 | -0- | ||||||||||
| Income taxes (benefit) | $ | (4,323 | ) | $ | 3,400 | $ | 904 | ||||||
The reasons for the difference between income tax expense and the amount computed by applying the statutory Federalfederal income tax rate to income before income taxes are as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||
| Computed statutory amount | $ | 9,189 | $ | 5,984 | $ | (3,712 | ) | |||||
| Effect of state income taxes | 65 | 16 | 11 | |||||||||
| Foreign rate differences | (151 | ) | 661 | 815 | ||||||||
| Medicare subsidy | (795 | ) | -0- | -0- | ||||||||
| Valuation allowance | (12,093 | ) | (3,042 | ) | 3,695 | |||||||
| Other, net | (538 | ) | (219 | ) | 95 | |||||||
| Income taxes (benefit) | $ | (4,323 | ) | $ | 3,400 | $ | 904 | |||||
38
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
Significant components of the Company'sCompany’s net deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
| December 31, | ||||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||
| Deferred tax assets: | ||||||||||
| Postretirement benefit obligation | $ | 7,542 | $ | 7,933 | ||||||
| Inventory | 10,433 | 11,277 | ||||||||
| Net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards | 18,996 | 20,384 | ||||||||
| Other — net | 12,246 | 11,867 | ||||||||
| Total deferred tax assets | 49,217 | 51,461 | ||||||||
| Deferred tax liabilities: | ||||||||||
| Tax over book depreciation | 15,578 | 15,492 | ||||||||
| Pension | 18,926 | 16,725 | ||||||||
| Deductible goodwill | 2,251 | 1,087 | ||||||||
| Total deferred tax liabilities | 36,755 | 33,304 | ||||||||
| 12,462 | 18,157 | |||||||||
| Valuation reserves | (7,011 | ) | (19,231 | ) | ||||||
| Net deferred tax asset (liability) | $ | 5,451 | $ | (1,074 | ) | |||||
At December 31, 2002,2005, the Company hashad net operating loss carryforwards for federal income tax purposes of approximately $25.6 million,$40,960, which will expire between 2021 and 2024.
The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income (including reversals of deferred tax liabilities). As of December 31, 2004, the Company was in 2021 or
2022. In accordance with the provisions of FAS 109 "Accounting for Income
Taxes", thea cumulative three year loss position and determined it was not more likely than not that its net deferred tax benefits related to these carryforwards have been fully reservedassets would be realized. Therefore, as of December 31, 2002 since2004, the Company ishad a full valuation allowance against its U.S. net deferred tax asset and a portion of its foreign net operating loss carryforwards. As of December 31, 2005, the Company was no longer in a three year cumulative loss position.
position and after consideration of the relevant positive and negative evidence, the Company determined a full valuation allowance was no longer appropriate. Accordingly, the Company reversed a portion of its valuation allowance and recognized $7,300 of tax benefit related to its U.S. net deferred tax asset as it has been determined the realization of this amount is more likely than not.
At December 31, 2005, the Company had research and development credit carryforwards of approximately $1,985, which expire between 2010 and 2024. The Company also had foreign tax credit carryforwards of $711 which expire in 2015 and alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards of $1,141 which have no expiration date.
Deferred taxes have not been provided on undistributed earnings of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries as it is the Company’s policy to permanently reinvest such earnings. The Company has determined that it is not practical to determine the deferred tax liability on such undistributed earnings.
NOTE G -- LEGAL PROCEEDINGSH — Legal Proceedings
The Company is subject to various pending and threatened lawsuits in which claims for monetary damages are asserted in the ordinary course of business. While any litigation involves an element of uncertainty, in the opinion of management, liabilities, if any, arising from currently pending or
39
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
threatened litigation willis not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company'sCompany’s financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
27
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
NOTE H -- PENSIONS AND POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITSI — Pensions and Postretirement Benefits
The following tables set forth the change in benefit obligation, plan assets, funded status and amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet for the defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans as of December 31, 20022005 and 2001:
2004:
| Postretirement | ||||||||||||||||
| Pension | Benefits | |||||||||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
Change in benefit obligation | ||||||||||||||||
| Benefit obligation at beginning of year | $ | 55,303 | $ | 53,075 | $ | 24,680 | $ | 27,366 | ||||||||
| Service cost | 364 | 291 | 145 | 136 | ||||||||||||
| Curtailment and settlement | (1,023 | ) | -0- | -0- | -0- | |||||||||||
| Interest cost | 3,194 | 3,320 | 1,281 | 1,532 | ||||||||||||
| Amendments | -0- | 566 | -0- | -0- | ||||||||||||
| Actuarial losses (gains) | 2,101 | 2,799 | 200 | (637 | ) | |||||||||||
| Benefits and expenses paid, net of contributions | (5,205 | ) | (4,748 | ) | (3,463 | ) | (3,717 | ) | ||||||||
| Benefit obligation at end of year | $ | 54,734 | $ | 55,303 | $ | 22,843 | $ | 24,680 | ||||||||
Change in plan assets | ||||||||||||||||
| Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year | $ | 103,948 | $ | 97,603 | $ | -0- | $ | -0- | ||||||||
| Actual return on plan assets | 3,919 | 11,093 | -0- | -0- | ||||||||||||
| Company contributions | -0- | -0- | 3,463 | 3,717 | ||||||||||||
| Curtailments and settlement | (1,023 | ) | -0- | -0- | -0- | |||||||||||
| Benefits and expenses paid, net of contributions | (5,205 | ) | (4,748 | ) | (3,463 | ) | (3,717 | ) | ||||||||
| Fair value of plan assets at end of year | $ | 101,639 | $ | 103,948 | $ | -0- | $ | -0- | ||||||||
| Funded (underfunded) status of the plan | $ | 46,905 | $ | 48,645 | $ | (22,843 | ) | $ | (24,680 | ) | ||||||
| Unrecognized net transition obligation | (386 | ) | (439 | ) | -0- | -0- | ||||||||||
| Unrecognized net actuarial (gain) loss | (13 | ) | (6,929 | ) | 4,734 | 4,639 | ||||||||||
| Unrecognized prior service cost (benefit) | 922 | 1,210 | (178 | ) | (247 | ) | ||||||||||
| Net amount recognized at year end | $ | 47,428 | $ | 42,487 | $ | (18,287 | ) | $ | (20,288 | ) | ||||||
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets consists of:
| 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||
| Prepaid pension cost | $ | 47,164 | $ | 41,295 | |||||
| Accrued pension cost | (5,491 | ) | (4,211 | ) | |||||
| Intangible asset | 397 | 565 | |||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | 5,358 | 4,838 | |||||||
| Net amount recognized at the end of the year | $ | 47,428 | $ | 42,487 | |||||
40
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
The pension plan weighted-average asset allocation at December 31, 2005 and 2004 and target allocation for 2006 are as follows:
| Plan Assets | ||||||||||||
| Target 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
Asset Category | ||||||||||||
| Equity securities | 60-70 | % | 71.1 | % | 66.7 | % | ||||||
| Debt securities | 20-30 | 19.7 | 20.5 | |||||||||
| Other | 7-15 | 9.2 | 12.8 | |||||||||
| 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | |||||||
The Company recorded a minimum pension liability of $5,555$5,358 at December 31, 2002,2005 and $4,838 at December 31, 2004, as required by Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 87. The adjustment is reflected in other comprehensive income and long-term liabilities. The adjustment relates to two of the Company'sCompany’s defined benefit
28
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED plans, for which the accumulated benefit obligations of $15,573$17,476 at December 31, 2005 ($17,458 at December 31, 2004), exceed the fair value of the underlying pension assets of $12,047.$11,985 at December 31, 2005 ($13,247 at December 31, 2004). Amounts were as follows:
| For the Year Ended | ||||||||
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | |||||||
| Projected benefit obligation | $ | 17,476 | $ | 17,458 | ||||
| Accumulated benefit obligation | $ | 17,476 | $ | 17,458 | ||||
| Fair value of plan assets | $ | 11,985 | $ | 13,247 | ||||
The following tables summarize the assumptions used by the consulting actuary and the related cost information.
| Weighted-Average assumptions as of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Postretirement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pension | Benefits | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Discount rate | 5.50 | % | 6.00 | % | 6.50 | % | 5.50 | % | 6.00 | % | 6.50 | % | ||||||||||||
| Expected return on plan assets | 8.75 | % | 8.75 | % | 8.75 | % | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||
| Rate of compensation increase | N/A | N/A | 2.00 | % | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
In determining its expected return on plan assets assumption for the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company considered historical experience, its asset allocation, expected future long-term rates of return for each major asset class, and an assumed long-term inflation rate. Based on these factors, the Company derived an expected return on plan assets for the year ended December 31, 2005 of 8.50%. This assumption was supported by the asset return generation model, which projected future asset returns using simulation and asset class correlation.
41
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
For measurement purposes, a 6.25% percent9% annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered health care benefits was assumed for 2003.2005. The rate was assumed to decrease gradually to 5.75%5% for 20042009 and remain at that level thereafter.
| Pension Benefits | Other Benefits | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||
Components of net periodic benefit cost | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Service costs | $ | 364 | $ | 291 | $ | 545 | $ | 145 | $ | 136 | $ | 147 | ||||||||||||
| Interest costs | 3,194 | 3,320 | 3,498 | 1,281 | 1,532 | 1,701 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Expected return on plan assets | (8,804 | ) | (8,313 | ) | (7,229 | ) | -0- | -0- | -0- | |||||||||||||||
| Transition obligation | (49 | ) | (49 | ) | (49 | ) | -0- | -0- | -0- | |||||||||||||||
| Amortization of prior service cost | 163 | 129 | 257 | (69 | ) | (80 | ) | (80 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Recognized net actuarial (gain) loss | (224 | ) | (286 | ) | 361 | 106 | 99 | 43 | ||||||||||||||||
| Benefit (income) costs | $ | (5,356 | ) | $ | (4,908 | ) | $ | (2,617 | ) | $ | 1,463 | $ | 1,687 | $ | 1,811 | |||||||||
Below is a table summarizing the Company’s expected future benefit payments and the expected payments due to the Medicare subsidy over the next ten years:
| Pension | Other | Payments due to | ||||||||||
| Benefits | Benefits | Medicare Subsidy | ||||||||||
| 2006 | $ | 4,534 | $ | 2,517 | $ | 231 | ||||||
| 2007 | 4,374 | 2,465 | 237 | |||||||||
| 2008 | 4,300 | 2,450 | 270 | |||||||||
| 2009 | 4,290 | 2,364 | 242 | |||||||||
| 2010 | 4,240 | 2,304 | 241 | |||||||||
| 2011 to 2015 | 20,087 | 9,881 | 1,080 | |||||||||
The Company recorded $2,700$167 of non-cash pension curtailment charges in 2002
and $400 in 20012003 related to the disposalclosure of twoa manufacturing facilities.facility. These were classified as restructuring charges in both years.each year.
The Company has two postretirement benefit plans. Under both of these plans, health care benefits are provided on both a contributory and noncontributory basis. The assumed health care cost trend rate has a significant effect on the amounts reported. A one-percentage-point change in the assumed health care cost trend rate would have the following effects:
| 1-Percentage | 1-Percentage | |||||||
| Point | Point | |||||||
| Increase | Decrease | |||||||
| Effect on total of service and interest cost components in 2005 | $ | 127 | $ | (107 | ) | |||
| Effect on post retirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 2005 | $ | 1,886 | $ | (1,601 | ) | |||
The total contribution charged to pension expense for the Company'sCompany’s defined contribution plans was $1,273$1,753 in 2002, $1,3822005, $1,446 in 20012004 and $1,418$1,331 in 2000.
29
2003. The Company expects to have contributions of $1,212 to its defined benefit plans in 2006.
42
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
— Continued
NOTE I -- LEASESJ — Leases
Rental expense for 2002, 20012005, 2004 and 20002003 was $10,749, $12,638$13,494, $10,588 and $12,816,$10,263, respectively. Future minimum lease commitments during each of the five years following December 31, 20022005 and thereafter are as follows: $8,561 in 2003, $5,358 in 2004,
$3,814 in 2005, $2,093$10,637 in 2006, $1,193$7,662 in 2007, $5,389 in 2008, $4,279 in 2009, $2,724 in 2010 and $2,433$2,286 thereafter.
NOTE J -- INDUSTRY SEGMENTSK — Industry Segments
The Company operates through three segments: Integrated Logistics Solutions ("ILS"(“ILS”), Aluminum Products and Manufactured Products. ILS is a leading supply chain logistics provider of production components to large, multinational manufacturing companies, other manufacturers and distributors. In connection with the supply of such production components, ILS provides a variety of value-added, cost-effective supply chain management services. The principal customers of ILS are in the semiconductor equipment, heavy-duty truck, industrialautomotive and vehicle parts, electrical distribution and controls, power sports/fitness equipment, HVAC, aerospace and defense, electrical controls, HVAC, vehicle
partscomponents, appliance and accessories, appliances, and lawn and gardensemiconductor equipment industries. Aluminum Products manufactures cast aluminum components for automotive, agricultural equipment, construction equipment, heavy-duty truck and construction equipment.marine equipment industries. Aluminum Products also provides value-added services such as design and engineering, machining and assembly. Manufactured Products operates a diverse group of niche manufacturing businesses that design and manufacture a broad range of high quality products engineered for specific customer applications. The principal customers of Manufactured Products are original equipment manufacturers and end-usersend users in the steel, coatings, forging, foundry, heavy-duty truck, construction equipment, bottling, automotive, oil and gas, rail and locomotive manufacturing and aerospace automotive, railroad, truck and oildefense industries.
The Company'sCompany’s sales are made through its own sales organization, distributors and representatives. Intersegment sales are immaterial and eliminated in consolidation and are not included in the figures presented. Intersegment sales are accounted for at values based on market prices. Income allocated to segments excludes certain corporate expenses and interest expense. Identifiable assets by industry segment include assets directly identified with those operations.
Corporate assets generally consist of cash and cash equivalents, deferred tax assets, property and equipment, and other assets.
30
43
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
For the years ended December 31, 2002— Continued
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||
| Net sales: | |||||||||||||
| ILS | $ | 532,624 | $ | 453,223 | $ | 377,645 | |||||||
| Aluminum Products | 159,053 | 135,402 | 90,080 | ||||||||||
| Manufactured Products | 241,223 | 220,093 | 156,570 | ||||||||||
| $ | 932,900 | $ | 808,718 | $ | 624,295 | ||||||||
| Income (loss) before income taxes: | |||||||||||||
| ILS | $ | 34,814 | $ | 29,191 | $ | 24,893 | |||||||
| Aluminum Products | 9,103 | 9,021 | 10,201 | ||||||||||
| Manufactured Products | 20,630 | 18,890 | (13,759 | ) | |||||||||
| 64,547 | 57,102 | 21,335 | |||||||||||
| Corporate costs | (10,241 | ) | (7,756 | ) | (5,803 | ) | |||||||
| Interest expense | (27,056 | ) | (31,413 | ) | (26,151 | ) | |||||||
| $ | 27,250 | $ | 17,933 | $ | (10,619 | ) | |||||||
| Identifiable assets: | |||||||||||||
| ILS | $ | 323,176 | $ | 297,002 | $ | 267,361 | |||||||
| Aluminum Products | 104,618 | 105,535 | 88,031 | ||||||||||
| Manufactured Products | 169,004 | 163,230 | 121,331 | ||||||||||
| General corporate | 71,056 | 46,080 | 32,821 | ||||||||||
| $ | 667,854 | $ | 611,847 | $ | 509,544 | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization expense: | |||||||||||||
| ILS | $ | 4,575 | $ | 4,608 | $ | 4,868 | |||||||
| Aluminum Products | 7,484 | 5,858 | 5,342 | ||||||||||
| Manufactured Products | 4,986 | 4,728 | 5,050 | ||||||||||
| General corporate | 216 | 191 | 219 | ||||||||||
| $ | 17,261 | $ | 15,385 | $ | 15,479 | ||||||||
| Capital expenditures: | |||||||||||||
| ILS | $ | 2,070 | $ | 3,691 | $ | 3,017 | |||||||
| Aluminum Products | 10,473 | 5,497 | 1,878 | ||||||||||
| Manufactured Products | 7,266 | 720 | 5,867 | ||||||||||
| General corporate | 486 | 55 | 107 | ||||||||||
| $ | 20,295 | $ | 9,963 | $ | 10,869 | ||||||||
The Company had sales of $107,853 in 2005, $95,610 in 2004 and 2001, sales$68,238 in 2003 to no single customer
were greater than 10%International Truck, which represented approximately 12%, 12% and 11% of consolidated net sales. For the year endedsales for each respective year.
44
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
The Company’s approximate percentage of net sales by geographic region were as follows:
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||
| December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||
| United States | 79 | % | 74 | % | 83 | % | ||||||
| Canada | 7 | % | 9 | % | 8 | % | ||||||
| Other | 14 | % | 17 | % | 9 | % | ||||||
| 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | |||||||
At December 31, 2000, all three segments2005, approximately 86% of the Company had sales to Ford Motor Company, which
aggregated $73,039 and represented approximately 10% of consolidated net sales.
For the three years ended 2002, approximately 80% of the Company's net
salesCompany’s assets were within the United States and 13% were within Canada. Approximately
91% of the Company's assets are maintained in the United States.
NOTE K -- NON-OPERATING ITEMS, NET
In June 2000, the Company's Cicero Flexible Products plant was destroyed in
a fire. For the year endedL — Accumulated Comprehensive Loss
The components of accumulated comprehensive loss at December 31, 2000,2005 and 2004 are as follows:
| December 31, | |||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | $ | (3,256 | ) | $ | (3,162 | ) | |||
| Minimum pension liability | 5,358 | 4,838 | |||||||
| Total | $ | 2,102 | $ | 1,676 | |||||
NOTE M — Restructuring and Unusual Charges
During the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company received a partial
settlement fromcontinued its insurance carrier primarily reflecting the replacement cost
of fixed assets and recognized a net gain of $5.2 million. During 2001,multi-year efforts to position the Company expensed $1.9 million of non-recurring business interruption costs,
which were not covered by insurance. In June 2000, the Company completed the
sale of substantially all of the assets of Kay Home Productsfor renewed, more profitable growth and recorded a
pretax loss of approximately $15.3 million.
31
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
NOTE L -- RESTRUCTURING AND UNUSUAL CHARGES
The Company responded to the economic downturn by reducing costs in a
variety of ways, including restructuring businesses and selling non-core
manufacturing assets. These activities generated restructuring and asset
impairment charges in 2001 and 2002, as the Company's restructuring efforts
continued and evolved.
During 2001, the Company recorded restructuring and asset impairment charges aggregating $28.5 million,$19,446. The action primarily related to management decisionsrestructuring at the Company’s Forge Group resulting from a decision to exit certain under-performing product lines andshut down its locomotive crankshaft forging plant after entering into a long-term supply contract to close or consolidate certain
operating facilities in 2002. The Company's actions included 1) selling or
discontinuing the businesses of Castle Rubber and Ajax Manufacturing, 2) closing
the Cicero Flexible Products' manufacturing facility and discontinue certain
product lines, 3) inventory write-downs and other restructuring activities at
St. Louis Screw & Bolt and Tocco, 4) closing twenty ILS branch warehouses and
two ILS manufacturing plants, 5) closing an Aluminum Products machining
facility, and 6) write-down of certain Corporate assets to current value.purchase these forgings from a third party. The charges were composed of $11.3 million$990 for the impairment of property and
equipment and other long-term assets; $10.3 millionexit costs; $638 of cost of goods sold primarily to write down inventory of discontinued businesses and product lines to current market value; $1,767 for pension curtailment and $6.9 million for severance (525 employees)multi-employer pension plan withdrawal costs resulting primarily from the termination of union representation at the locomotive crankshaft forging plant and exit
costs. Below is a summaryanother Manufactured Products manufacturing facility and the closure of these charges by segment.
During 2002, the Company recorded further restructuring and asset
impairment charges aggregating $19.2 million, primarily related to management
decisions to exit additional product lines and consolidate additional
facilities. The Company's planned actions included 1) selling or discontinuing
the businesses of St. Louis Screw & Bolt and Green Bearing, 2) closing five
additional ILS branch warehouses and 3) closing or selling twoan Aluminum Products manufacturing plants (one of which was closed as of December 31, 2002). The
charges were composed of $5.6 million for severance (490 employees)plant; and exit
costs, $2.7 million for pension curtailment costs; $5.6 million of costs of
goods sold, primarily to write down inventory of discontinued businesses and
product lines to current market value; and $5.3 million$16,051 for impairment of property and equipment and other long-term assets. Below is a summary of these charges by segment.
32
| Cost of | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Products | Asset | Restructuring | Pension | |||||||||||||||||
| Sold | Impairment | & Severance | Curtailment | Total | ||||||||||||||||
| Manufactured Products | $ | 638 | $ | 16,051 | $ | 990 | $ | 1,600 | $ | 19,279 | ||||||||||
| Aluminum Products | -0- | -0- | -0- | 167 | 167 | |||||||||||||||
| $ | 638 | $ | 16,051 | $ | 990 | $ | 1,767 | $ | 19,446 | |||||||||||
During the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company recorded additional restructuring and asset impairment charges associated with executing restructuring actions in the Aluminum Products and Manufactured Products segments initiated in prior years. The charges were composed of $833 of inventory impairment included in Cost of Products Sold, $391 of asset impairment, $152 of multi-employer
45
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED— Continued
pension plan withdrawal costs and $400 of restructuring charges related to the closure of two Manufactured Products manufacturing facilities. Below is a summary of these charges by segment.
| Cost of | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Products | Asset | Restructuring | Pension | |||||||||||||||||
| Sold | Impairment | & Severance | Curtailment | Total | ||||||||||||||||
| Manufactured Products | $ | 833 | $ | -0- | $ | 400 | $ | 152 | $ | 1,385 | ||||||||||
| Aluminum Products | -0- | 391 | -0- | -0- | 391 | |||||||||||||||
| $ | 833 | $ | 391 | $ | 400 | $ | 152 | $ | 1,776 | |||||||||||
The accrued liability for severance and exit costs and related cash payments consisted of:
| Balance at January 1, 2003 | $ | 4,045 | ||
| Severance and exit charges recorded in 2003 | 990 | |||
| Cash payments made in 2003 | (2,500 | ) | ||
| Balance at December 31, 2003 | 2,535 | |||
| Severance and exit charges recorded in 2004 | -0- | |||
| Cash payments made in 2004 | (2,073 | ) | ||
| Balance at December 31, 2004 | 462 | |||
| Exit charges recorded in 2005 | 400 | |||
| Cash payments made in 2005 | (266 | ) | ||
| Balance at December 31, 2005 | $ | 596 | ||
As of December 31, 2002,2005, all of the 525 employees identified in 2001 and all but 80 of the 490 employees identified in 2002 had been terminated. The workforce reductions under the restructuring plan consisted of hourly and salarysalaried employees at various operating facilities due to either closure or consolidation. As of December 31, 2005, the Company had an accrued liability of $596 for future estimated employee severance and plant closing payments.
Idle fixed assets of $5,161 were included in other assets as of December 31, 2005. These consisted primarily of property, plant and equipment of two idled aluminum casting plants, for which the Company is evaluating new products and technologies. These assets may either be reclassified to property, plant and equipment if placed in service, or sold. They are currently carried at estimated fair value.
At December 31, 2002,2005, the Company'sCompany’s balance sheet reflected assets held for sale at their estimated current value of $6.1 million for inventory and $15.2
million$1,992 for property, plant and equipment and other long-term assets.equipment. Net sales for the businesses that were included in net assets held for sale (Ajax Manufacturing, Castle Rubber, St. Louis
Screw & Boltwere $-0- in 2005, $-0- in 2004, and Green Bearing) were $19,159$1,139 in 2002, $25,356 in 2001, and
$27,145 in 2000.2003. Operating income (loss), excluding restructuring and unusual
charges for these entities were $(334)$-0- in 2002, $7032005, $-0- in 2001,2004, and $1,021$(32) in 2000.
33
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN2003.
NOTE N — Derivatives and Hedging
The Company recognizes all derivative financial instruments as either assets or liabilities at fair value. The Company has no derivative instruments that are classified as fair value hedges. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments that are classified as cash flow hedges are recognized in other comprehensive income until such time as the hedged items are recognized in net income.
During the second quarter of 2004, the Company entered into forward contracts for the purpose of hedging exposure to changes in the value of accounts receivable in euros against the US dollar, for a notional amount of $5,075, of which $500 was outstanding at December 31, 2004. These transactions are considered cash flow hedges and, therefore, the fair market value at December 31, 2004 of a $75 loss has
46
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTINGSUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
been recognized in other comprehensive income (loss). Because there is no ineffectiveness on the cash flow hedges, all changes in fair value of these derivatives are recorded in equity and not included in the current period’s income statement. The $75 of loss on the fair value of the hedges is classified in current accrued liabilities. The Company recognized $169 of foreign currency losses upon settlement of the forward contracts.
NOTE O — Supplemental Guarantor Information
Each of the material domestic direct and indirectwholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company (the “Guarantor Subsidiaries”) has fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a joint and several basis, to pay principal, premium and interest with respect to the 8.375% Notes. Each of the Guarantor Subsidiaries is “100% owned” as defined by Rule 3-10(h)(1) of Regulation S-X.
The following supplemental consolidating condensed financial statements present consolidating condensed balance sheets as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, consolidating condensed statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, consolidating condensed statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2003, consolidating condensed statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 and reclassification and elimination entries necessary to consolidate the Parent and all of its subsidiaries. The “Parent” reflected in the accompanying supplemental guarantor information isPark-Ohio Industries, Inc.
47
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DISCLOSURESTATEMENTS — Continued
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
December 31, 2005
| Combined | Combined | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | Reclassifications/ | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Parent | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ASSETS | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | (11,036 | ) | $ | 626 | $ | 11,899 | $ | 16,379 | $ | 17,868 | |||||||||||
| Accounts receivable, net | -0- | 129,302 | 24,200 | -0- | 153,502 | |||||||||||||||||
| Inventories | -0- | 160,775 | 29,778 | -0- | 190,553 | |||||||||||||||||
| Other current assets | 464 | 20,029 | 1,147 | 6,113 | 27,753 | |||||||||||||||||
| Deferred tax assets | -0- | -0- | -0- | 8,627 | 8,627 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total Current Assets | (10,572 | ) | 310,732 | 67,024 | 31,119 | 398,303 | ||||||||||||||||
| Investment in subsidiaries | 290,802 | -0- | -0- | (290,802 | ) | -0- | ||||||||||||||||
| Inter-company advances | 359,963 | 372,156 | 8,208 | (740,327 | ) | -0- | ||||||||||||||||
| Property, Plant and Equipment, net | 2,536 | 101,175 | 12,520 | -0- | 116,231 | |||||||||||||||||
| Other Assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Goodwill | -0- | 78,424 | 4,279 | -0- | 82,703 | |||||||||||||||||
| Other | 34,724 | 37,530 | 686 | (2,323 | ) | 70,617 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total Other Assets | 34,724 | 115,954 | 4,965 | (2,323 | ) | 153,320 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total Assets | $ | 677,453 | $ | 900,017 | $ | 92,717 | $ | (1,002,333 | ) | $ | 667,854 | |||||||||||
| LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trade accounts payable | $ | 3,348 | $ | 87,666 | $ | 9,778 | $ | 14,604 | $ | 115,396 | ||||||||||||
| Accrued expenses | 1,643 | 46,847 | 14,763 | 5,060 | 68,313 | |||||||||||||||||
| Current portion of long-term liabilities | -0- | 11,054 | 590 | (7,483 | ) | 4,161 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total Current Liabilities | 4,991 | 145,567 | 25,131 | 12,181 | 187,870 | |||||||||||||||||
| Long-Term Liabilities, less current portion | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.375% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014 | 210,000 | -0- | -0- | -0- | 210,000 | |||||||||||||||||
| Revolving credit maturing on December 31, 2010 | 128,300 | -0- | -0- | -0- | 128,300 | |||||||||||||||||
| Other long-term debt | -0- | 34,533 | 3,140 | (30,968 | ) | 6,705 | ||||||||||||||||
| Deferred tax liability | -0- | -0- | -0- | 3,176 | 3,176 | |||||||||||||||||
| Other postretirement benefits and other long-term liabilities | 4,115 | 21,501 | 3,076 | (2,518 | ) | 26,174 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total Long-Term Liabilities | 342,415 | 56,034 | 6,216 | (30,310 | ) | 374,355 | ||||||||||||||||
| Inter-company advances | 227,614 | 415,558 | 17,674 | (660,846 | ) | -0- | ||||||||||||||||
| Shareholder’s Equity | 102,433 | 282,858 | 43,696 | (323,358 | ) | 105,629 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total Liabilities and Shareholder’s Equity | $ | 677,453 | $ | 900,017 | $ | 92,717 | $ | (1,002,333 | ) | $ | 667,854 | |||||||||||
48
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
December 31, 2004
| Combined | Combined | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | Reclassifications/ | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Parent | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ASSETS | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | (14,387 | ) | $ | 199 | $ | 6,851 | $ | 13,744 | $ | 6,407 | |||||||||||
| Accounts receivable, net | 114 | 117,097 | 30,208 | (1,944 | ) | 145,475 | ||||||||||||||||
| Inventories | (81 | ) | 151,187 | 26,188 | -0- | 177,294 | ||||||||||||||||
| Other current assets | 499 | 12,215 | 1,799 | 6,142 | 20,655 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total Current Assets | (13,855 | ) | 280,698 | 65,046 | 17,942 | 349,831 | ||||||||||||||||
| Investment in subsidiaries | 341,088 | -0- | -0- | (341,088 | ) | -0- | ||||||||||||||||
| Inter-company advances | 251,357 | 224,918 | 5,145 | (481,420 | ) | -0- | ||||||||||||||||
| Property, Plant and Equipment, net | 2,266 | 95,494 | 12,121 | -0- | 109,881 | |||||||||||||||||
| Other Assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Goodwill | -0- | 78,424 | 4,141 | -0- | 82,565 | |||||||||||||||||
| Net assets held for sale | -0- | 1,035 | -0- | -0- | 1,035 | |||||||||||||||||
| Other | 43,908 | 37,316 | 1,490 | (14,179 | ) | 68,535 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total Other Assets | 43,908 | 116,775 | 5,631 | (14,179 | ) | 152,135 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total Assets | $ | 624,764 | $ | 717,885 | $ | 87,943 | $ | (818,745 | ) | $ | 611,847 | |||||||||||
| LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trade accounts payable | $ | 4,347 | $ | 87,291 | $ | 16,130 | $ | 1,094 | $ | 108,862 | ||||||||||||
| Accrued expenses | 6,291 | 44,529 | 8,925 | -0- | 59,745 | |||||||||||||||||
| Current portion of long-term liabilities | -0- | 587 | 2,344 | 2,881 | 5,812 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total Current Liabilities | 10,638 | 132,407 | 27,399 | 3,975 | 174,419 | |||||||||||||||||
| Long-Term Liabilities, less current portion | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.375% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014 | 210,000 | -0- | -0- | -0- | 210,000 | |||||||||||||||||
| Revolving credit maturing on December 31, 2010 | 120,600 | -0- | -0- | -0- | 120,600 | |||||||||||||||||
| Other long-term debt | -0- | 35,037 | 707 | (30,968 | ) | 4,776 | ||||||||||||||||
| Deferred tax liability | 1,074 | -0- | -0- | -0- | 1,074 | |||||||||||||||||
| Other postretirement benefits and other long-term liabilities | 4,241 | 21,875 | 3,261 | (2,881 | ) | 26,496 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total Long-Term Liabilities | 335,915 | 56,912 | 3,968 | (33,849 | ) | 362,946 | ||||||||||||||||
| Inter-company advances | 206,503 | 242,202 | 17,425 | (466,130 | ) | -0- | ||||||||||||||||
| Shareholder’s Equity | 71,708 | 286,364 | 39,151 | (322,741 | ) | 74,482 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total Liabilities and Shareholder’s Equity | $ | 624,764 | $ | 717,885 | $ | 87,943 | $ | (818,745 | ) | $ | 611,847 | |||||||||||
49
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the Year Ended December 31, 2005
| Combined | Combined | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Parent | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Net sales | $ | -0- | $ | 827,815 | $ | 114,179 | $ | (9,094 | ) | $ | 932,900 | ||||||||||
| Cost of sales | -0- | 715,057 | 90,320 | (9,094 | ) | 796,283 | |||||||||||||||
| Gross profit | -0- | 112,758 | 23,859 | -0- | 136,617 | ||||||||||||||||
| Operating Expenses: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Selling, general and administrative expenses | 3,349 | 62,394 | 15,025 | 600 | 81,368 | ||||||||||||||||
| Restructuring and impairment charges | -0- | 943 | -0- | -0- | 943 | ||||||||||||||||
| Operating Income | (3,349 | ) | 49,421 | 8,834 | (600 | ) | 54,306 | ||||||||||||||
| Interest expense | (5,346 | ) | 31,442 | 1,560 | (600 | ) | 27,056 | ||||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 1,997 | 17,979 | 7,274 | -0- | 27,250 | ||||||||||||||||
| Income taxes | (7,439 | ) | 59 | 3,057 | -0- | (4,323 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 9,436 | $ | 17,920 | $ | 4,217 | $ | -0- | $ | 31,573 | |||||||||||
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004
| Combined | Combined | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Parent | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Net sales | $ | -0- | $ | 697,888 | $ | 123,827 | $ | (12,997 | ) | $ | 808,718 | ||||||||||
| Cost of sales | -0- | 599,379 | 96,276 | (12,997 | ) | 682,658 | |||||||||||||||
| Gross profit | -0- | 98,509 | 27,551 | -0- | 126,060 | ||||||||||||||||
| Operating Expenses: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Selling, general and administrative expenses | (22,748 | ) | 82,657 | 16,605 | 200 | 76,714 | |||||||||||||||
| Operating Income | 22,748 | 15,852 | 10,946 | (200 | ) | 49,346 | |||||||||||||||
| Interest expense | 30,954 | 439 | 220 | (200 | ) | 31,413 | |||||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | (8,206 | ) | 15,413 | 10,726 | -0- | 17,933 | |||||||||||||||
| Income taxes | 318 | -0- | 3,082 | -0- | 3,400 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | (8,524 | ) | $ | 15,413 | $ | 7,644 | $ | -0- | $ | 14,533 | ||||||||||
50
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2003
| Combined | Combined | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Parent | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Net sales | $ | -0- | $ | 546,002 | $ | 84,298 | $ | (6,005 | ) | $ | 624,295 | ||||||||||
| Cost of sales | -0- | 463,984 | 69,607 | (6,005 | ) | 527,586 | |||||||||||||||
| Gross profit | -0- | 82,018 | 14,691 | -0- | 96,709 | ||||||||||||||||
| Operating Expenses: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Selling, general and administrative expenses | 2,094 | 48,682 | 11,593 | -0- | 62,369 | ||||||||||||||||
| Restructuring and impairment charges | -0- | 18,553 | 255 | -0- | 18,808 | ||||||||||||||||
| Operating Income | (2,094 | ) | 14,783 | 2,843 | -0- | 15,532 | |||||||||||||||
| Interest expense | 1,239 | 23,781 | 1,131 | -0- | 26,151 | ||||||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | (3,333 | ) | (8,998 | ) | 1,712 | -0- | (10,619 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Income taxes | 16 | -0- | 888 | -0- | 904 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | (3,349 | ) | $ | (8,998 | ) | $ | 824 | $ | -0- | $ | (11,523 | ) | ||||||||
51
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2005
| Combined | Combined | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Parent | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided (used ) by operations | $ | (1,228 | ) | $ | 29,314 | $ | 6,409 | $ | -0- | $ | 34,495 | ||||||||||
| Cash flows from investing activities: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Purchases of property, plant and equipment, net | (486 | ) | (17,769 | ) | (2,040 | ) | -0- | (20,295 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Acquisitions, net of cash acquired | -0- | (12,181 | ) | -0- | -0- | (12,181 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from sale of assets held for sale | -0- | 1,100 | -0- | -0- | 1,100 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided (used ) in investing activities | (486 | ) | (28,850 | ) | (2,040 | ) | -0- | (31,376 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Cash flows from financing activities: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from bank arrangements, net | 7,700 | (37 | ) | 679 | -0- | 8,342 | |||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided (used ) by financing activities | 7,700 | (37 | ) | 679 | -0- | 8,342 | |||||||||||||||
| Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 5,986 | 427 | 5,048 | -0- | 11,461 | ||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | (643 | ) | 199 | 6,851 | -0- | 6,407 | |||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | $ | 5,343 | $ | 626 | $ | 11,899 | $ | -0- | $ | 17,868 | |||||||||||
52
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004
| Combined | Combined | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Parent | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided (used ) by operations | $ | (24,045 | ) | $ | 18,123 | $ | 6,836 | $ | -0- | $ | 914 | ||||||||||
| Cash flows from investing activities: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Purchases of property, plant and equipment, net | (55 | ) | (8,979 | ) | (929 | ) | -0- | (9,963 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Acquisitions, net of cash acquired | -0- | (9,997 | ) | -0- | -0- | (9,997 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from sale of assets held for sale | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- | ||||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided (used ) in investing activities | (55 | ) | (18,976 | ) | (929 | ) | -0- | (19,960 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Cash flows from financing activities: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from 8.375% Senior Subordinated Notes | 205,179 | -0- | -0- | -0- | 205,179 | ||||||||||||||||
| Payment on 9.25% Senior Subordinated Notes | (199,930 | ) | -0- | -0- | -0- | (199,930 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Principal payments on revolving credit and long-term debt, net | 19,600 | 171 | (1,758 | ) | -0- | 18,013 | |||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided (used ) by financing activities | 24,849 | 171 | (1,758 | ) | -0- | 23,262 | |||||||||||||||
| Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 749 | (682 | ) | 4,149 | -0- | 4,216 | |||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | (1,392 | ) | 881 | 2,702 | -0- | 2,191 | |||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | $ | (643 | ) | $ | 199 | $ | 6,851 | $ | -0- | $ | 6,407 | ||||||||||
53
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2003
| Combined | Combined | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Parent | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided (used) by operations | $ | 7,459 | $ | 737 | $ | 3,622 | $ | -0- | $ | 11,818 | |||||||||||
| Cash flows from investing activities: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Purchases of property, plant and equipment, net | (50 | ) | (8,398 | ) | (2,421 | ) | -0- | (10,869 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Acquisitions, net of cash acquired | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- | ||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from sale of assets held for sale | -0- | 7,340 | -0- | -0- | 7,340 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided (used) in investing activities | (50 | ) | (1,058 | ) | (2,421 | ) | -0- | (3,529 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Cash flows from financing activities: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from bank arrangements | 112,000 | -0- | -0- | -0- | 112,000 | ||||||||||||||||
| Repayment of old revolving credit agreement | (112,000 | ) | -0- | -0- | -0- | (112,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Principal payments on revolving credit and long-term debt | (13,000 | ) | (796 | ) | (1,102 | ) | -0- | (14,898 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Net cash provided (used ) by financing activities | (13,000 | ) | (796 | ) | (1,102 | ) | -0- | (14,898 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | (5,591 | ) | (1,117 | ) | 99 | -0- | (6,609 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 4,199 | 1,998 | 2,603 | -0- | 8,800 | ||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | $ | (1,392 | ) | $ | 881 | $ | 2,702 | $ | -0- | $ | 2,191 | ||||||||||
54
| Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
There were no changes in noror disagreements with Park-Ohio'sthe Company’s independent auditors on accounting and financial disclosure matters within the two-year period ended December 31, 2002.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Information required by this item has been omitted pursuant to General
Instruction I2005.
55
| Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation of Form 10-K.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information required by this item has been omitted pursuant to General
Instruction Idisclosure controls and procedures
As of Form 10-K.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Information required by this item has been omitted pursuant to General
Instruction I of Form 10-K.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Information required by this item has been omitted pursuant to General
Instruction I of Form 10-K.
ITEM 14. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
During the 90-day period prior to the filling date of this report,December 31, 2005, management, including our chief executive officerChief Executive Officer and chief financial officer,Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company'sCompany’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon and as of the date of, that evaluation, our chief executive officerChief Executive Officer and chief financial officerChief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective, in all material
respects, to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required.
Changes in internal controls over financial reporting
There have been no significant changes in the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2005 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. As required by Rule 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, management carried out an evaluation, with participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005. The framework on which such evaluation was based is contained in the report entitled “Internal Control — Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the “COSO Report”). Management has identified no material weakness in internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s management has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 based on the framework contained in the COSO Report, and has prepared Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting included at page 24 of this annual report on Form 10-K, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Ernst & Young LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, have issued an attestation report on the Company’s management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005. This attestation report is included at page 25 of this Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference.
During 2005, we invested approximately $12.2 million, including debt assumed, in the acquisition of businesses across all our operations. As part of our ongoing integration activities, we are continuing to incorporate our controls orand procedures into these recently acquired businesses.
56
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
Part III
| Item 10. | Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant |
Information required by this item has been omitted pursuant to General Instruction I of Form 10-K.
| Item 11. | Executive Compensation |
Information required by this item has been omitted pursuant to General Instruction I of Form 10-K.
| Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
Information required by this item has been omitted pursuant to General Instruction I of Form 10-K.
| Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions |
Information required by this item has been omitted pursuant to General Instruction I of Form 10-K.
| Item 14. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
The following table presents fees for professional services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP to
the Company and its parent for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004:
the Company and its parent for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004:
| 2005 | 2004 | |||||||
| Audit fees | $ | 1,007,000 | $ | 1,264,000 | ||||
| Audit-related fees | 60,000 | 58,000 | ||||||
| Tax fees | 86,000 | 65,000 | ||||||
Fees for audit services include fees associated with the annual audit, the reviews of the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, statutory audits required internationally, services associated with the Company’s issuance of the 8.375% senior subordinated notes due 2014 and the audit of management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Audit-related fees principally included fees in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequentconnection with pension plan audits and accounting consultation. Tax fees include fees in connection with tax compliance and tax planning. Park-Ohio is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Holdings and does not have a separate audit committee. Holdings’ audit committee has adopted a pre-approval policy for audit and non-audit related services and auditor independence requiring the approval by Holdings’ audit committee of all professional services rendered by the Company’s and its parent’s independent auditor prior to the datecommencement of the Company carried outs its evaluation. Therespecified services.
100% of the services described in “Audit Fees,” “Audit-Related Fees” and “Tax Fees” were no significant
deficiencies or material weaknesses identifiedpre-approved by Holdings’ audit committee in the evaluation and, therefore,
no corrective actions were taken.
34
PARTaccordance with Holdings’ formal policy on auditor independence.
57
Part IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
| Item 15. | Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules |
(a)(1) The following financial statements are included in Part II, Item 8:
8 of this annual report on Form 10-K:
| Page | ||||
| Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting | 24 | |||
| Report of | 25 | |||
| Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | 26 | |||
| Consolidated Balance Sheets — December 31, 2005 and 2004 | 27 | |||
| Consolidated Statements of Operations — Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 | 28 | |||
| Consolidated Statements of Shareholder’s Equity — Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 | 29 | |||
| Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 | 30 | |||
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | 31 | |||
(2) Financial Statement Schedules
All Schedules
| All schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the SEC are not required under the related instructions or are not applicable and, therefore, have been omitted. |
(3) Exhibits:
| The exhibits filed as part of this Form 10-K are listed on the Exhibit Index immediately preceding such exhibits and are incorporated herein by reference. | |
| No annual report or proxy statement covering the Company’s last fiscal year has been or will be circulated to security holders. |
58
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required underAct of 1934, the related instructions or are not applicable and, therefore, have been
omitted.
(3) Exhibits:
The Exhibits filed as part ofregistrant has duly caused this Form 10-K are listed on the Exhibit Index
immediately preceding such exhibits, incorporated herein by reference.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K filed in the fourth quarter of 2002:
None
Supplemental Informationreport to be furnished with reports filed pursuant to
Section 15(d) ofsigned on its behalf by the Act by registrants which have not registered securities
pursuant to Section 12 of the Act.
No annual report or proxy statement covering the Company's last fiscal year
has been or will be circulated to security holders.
35
SIGNATURES
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, THE REGISTRANT HAS DULY CAUSED THIS REPORT TO BE SIGNED ON
ITS BEHALF BY THE UNDERSIGNED, THEREUNTO DULY AUTHORIZED.
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Registrant)
By: /s/ RICHARD P. ELLIOTT
------------------------------------
Richard P. Elliott, Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. (Registrant) |
| By: | /s/Richard P. Elliott |
| Richard P. Elliott, Vice President | |
| and Chief Financial Officer |
Date: March 27, 2003
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF2006
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, THIS
REPORT HAS BEEN SIGNED BY THE FOLLOWING PERSONS IN THE CAPACITIES AND ON THE
DATES INDICATED.
this report has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| * Edward F. Crawford | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and | March 15, 2006 | ||
| * Richard P. Elliott | Vice President | March 15, 2006 | ||
| * Matthew V. Crawford | President, Chief Operating Officer and Director | March 15, 2006 | ||
| * Patrick V. Auletta | Director | March 15, 2006 | ||
| * Kevin R. Greene | Director | March | ||
| * Lewis E. Hatch, Jr. | Director | March 27, 2006 | ||
| * Dan T. Moore | Director | March 15, 2006 | ||
| * Lawrence O. Selhorst | Director | March 15, 2006 | ||
| * Ronna Romney | Director | March 15, 2006 | ||
| * James W. Wert | Director | March 15, 2006 | ||
| * | The undersigned, pursuant to a Power of Attorney executed by each of the directors and officers identified above and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, by signing his name hereto, does hereby sign and execute this report on behalf of each of the persons noted above, in the capacities indicated. |
March 27, 2003
By: /s/ ROBERT D. VILSACK
------------------------------------
Robert D. Vilsack, Attorney-in-Fact
36
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Edward F. Crawford, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Park Ohio
Industries, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this annual report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
have:
a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this
annual report is being prepared.
b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c. presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely effect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material
weakness in internal controls; and
b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.
2006
| By: | /s/Robert D. Vilsack |
| Robert D. Vilsack,Attorney-in-Fact |
59
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
For the Year Ended December 31, 2002
2005
EXHIBIT INDEX
| Exhibit | ||||
| 3 | .1 | Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 10-K of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1998, SEC File No. 333-43005 and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof) | ||
| 3 | .2 | Code of Regulations of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Form 10-K of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1998, SEC File No. 333-43005 and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof) | ||
| 4 | .1 | Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated November 5, 2003, among Park-Ohio Industries, Inc., the other loan parties party thereto, the lenders party thereto, Bank One, NA and Banc One Capital Markets Inc. (filed as Exhibit 4 to the Form 10-Q of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, SEC File No. 000-03134 and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof) | ||
| 4 | .2 | First Amendment, dated September 30, 2004, to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated November 5, 2003, among Park-Ohio Industries, Inc., the other loan parties thereto, the lenders party thereto, Bank One, NA and Bank One Capital Markets, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. on October 1, 2004, SEC File No. 000-03134 and incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof) | ||
| 4 | .3 | Second Amendment, dated December 29, 2004, to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated November 5, 2003, among Park-Ohio Industries, Inc., the other loan parties thereto, the lenders party thereto and JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA (successor by merger to Bank One, NA), as agent (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. filed on January 5, 2005, SEC File No. 000-03134 and incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof) | ||
| 4 | .4 | Indenture, dated as of November 30, 2004, among Park-Ohio Industries, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein) and Wells Fargo Bank, NA, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. filed on December 6, 2004, SEC File No. 000-03134 and incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof) | ||
| 10 | .1 | Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. and each of its directors and certain officers (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-K of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1998, SEC File No. 333-43005 and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof) | ||
| 10 | .2* | Amended and Restated 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed as Appendix A to the Definitive Proxy Statement of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp., filed on April 23, 2001, SEC File No. 000-03134 and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof) | ||
| 10 | .3 | Registration Rights Agreement, dated November 30, 2004, among Park-Ohio Industries, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein) and the initial purchasers that are party thereto (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. filed on December 6, 2004, SEC File No. 000-03134 and incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof) | ||
| 24 | .1 | Power of Attorney | ||
| 31 | .1 | Principal Executive Officer’s Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
| 31 | .2 | Principal Financial Officer’s Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
| 32 | .1 | Certification requirement under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
| * | Reflects management contract or other compensatory arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 15(c) of |