SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20032004

OR

o
 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                         to                         

Commission file number 0-3134333-43005

PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
   
Ohio
34-6520107


(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 34-6520107
-----------------------------------------------------
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 
23000 Euclid Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio
44117


(Address of principal executive offices)
 
44117

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (216) 692-7200

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Pursuant to a corporate reorganization effective June 15, 1998, Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.

The registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instructions I 1(a) and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore filing this form with the reduced disclosure format.

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yesx     Noo

          Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.     x

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).     Yeso     Nox

All of the outstanding stock of the registrant is held by Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. As of March 25, 2004,15, 2005, 100 shares of the registrant’s common stock, $1 par value, were outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

None


 

Part I

Item 1. Business
Item 1. Business

The CompanyOverview

      Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. (“Park-Ohio”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (“Holdings”), was incorporated as an Ohio corporation in 1998.1984. Park-Ohio, primarily through theits subsidiaries, is a leading provider ofan industrial supply chain logistics services and a manufacturer of highly engineered products. Reference herein to the “Company” includes, where applicable, Holdings, Park-Ohio and its direct and indirect subsidiaries.

      The Company operates throughdiversified manufacturing business operating in three segments,segments: Integrated Logistics Solutions (“ILS”), Aluminum Products and Manufactured Products. ILS is a leading supply chain logistics provider of production components

      References herein to large, multinational manufacturers. In connection with the supply of such production components,“we” or “the Company” include, where applicable, Holdings, Park-Ohio and its other direct and indirect subsidiaries.

      ILS provides a variety of value-added, cost-effectiveour customers with integrated supply chain management services. The principal customers of ILS are in the heavy-duty truck, semiconductor equipment, industrial equipment, aerospace and defense, electrical controls, heating, ventilating and air-conditioning (“HVAC”), vehicle parts and accessories, appliances and lawn and garden equipment industries. Aluminum Products manufactures cast aluminum componentsservices for automotive, agricultural equipment, heavy-duty truck and construction equipment manufacturers. Aluminum Products also provides value-added services such as design and engineering, machining and assembly. Manufactured Products operates a diverse group of niche manufacturing businesses that design and manufacture a broad range of high quality products engineered for specific customer applications. The principal customers ofhigh-volume, specialty production components and has a leading market position in North America. Our Aluminum Products business manufactures cast and machined aluminum components, and our Manufactured Products arebusiness is a major manufacturer of highly-engineered industrial products. Our businesses serve large, industrial original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) in a variety of industrial sectors, including the automotive, heavy-duty truck, industrial equipment, steel, rail, electrical controls, aerospace and end-users in the aerospace, automotive, steel, forging, railroad, truck, oil, food processingdefense, lawn and consumer appliancegarden and semiconductor industries. As of December 31, 2003, the Company2004, we employed approximately 2,5003,200 persons.

Operations

      The following chart highlights the Company’s three business segments, the primary industries they serve andtable summarizes the key attributes of each of our business segments:

Integrated Logistics
SolutionsAluminum ProductsManufactured Products



NET SALES(1)
$453.2 million
(56% of total)
$135.4 million
(17% of total)
$220.1 million
(27% of total)
SELECTED PRODUCTSSourcing, planning and procurement of over 175,000 production components, including:
• Fasteners
• Pins
• Valves
• Hoses
• Wire harnesses
• Clamps and fittings
• Rubber and plastic
  components
• Pump housings
• Pinion carriers
• Clutch retainers
• Control arms
• Knuckles
• Brake calipers
• Master cylinders
• Induction heating and
  melting systems
• Pipe threading
  systems
• Industrial oven
  systems
• Injection molded
  rubber components
• Forging presses
SELECTED INDUSTRIES SERVED• Heavy-duty truck
• Electrical controls
• Automotive
• Other vehicle
• Industrial equipment
• Power sports
  equipment
• Lawn and garden
• Semiconductor
• Automotive
• Agricultural equipment
• Construction
  equipment
• Heavy-duty truck
• Steel
• Automotive
• Oil and gas
• Rail
• Aerospace and
  defense


(1) Results are for the year ended December 31, 2004 and exclude the results of operations related to the assets of the Amcast Components Group prior to the date of acquisition on August 23, 2004.

      We have established leading market positions across a variety of industries, and we believe we maintain a #1 or #2 market position in products they sell.

         
Net Sales
for the
Year Ended
Dec. 31,
SegmentPrimary Industries ServedSelected Products/Services2003




(millions)
INTEGRATED LOGISTICS SOLUTIONS Heavy-duty truck, semiconductor equipment, industrial equipment, aerospace and defense, electrical controls, HVAC, vehicle parts and accessories, appliances, lawn and garden equipment and automotive Cross-industry supply chain management services; planning, implementing and managing the physical flow of production components to the plant floor point of use for large multi-national manufacturing companies $377.6 
ALUMINUM PRODUCTS Automotive, agricultural equipment, heavy-duty truck and construction equipment Engineering, casting and machining of aluminum components $90.1 
and services that represent more than 75% of our net sales. We benefit from long-term, entrenched relationships with high-quality customers that include leading OEMs, and we derive approximately 70% of our net sales from sole-source arrangements.

Integrated Logistics Solutions

      Our ILS business provides our customers with integrated supply chain management services for a broad range of high-volume, specialty production components. Our ILS customers receive various value-added services, such as engineering and design services, part usage and cost analysis, supplier selection, quality assurance, bar coding, product packaging and tracking, just-in-time and point-of-use delivery,

1


 

         
Net Sales
for the
Year Ended
Dec. 31,
SegmentPrimary Industries ServedSelected Products/Services2003




(millions)
MANUFACTURED PRODUCTS Aerospace, automotive, steel, forging, foundry, railroad, construction equipment, truck, oil, coatings, food processing, and consumer appliance Engineering and manufacturing of the following: forged and machined products such as aircraft landing gears, locomotive crankshafts and camshafts; induction heating and melting systems; industrial rubber products; oil pipe threading systems; and industrial ovens $156.6 

Integrated Logistics Solutions

      ILS is a leading provider of cross-industry

electronic billing services and ongoing technical support. We operate 32 logistics service centers in the United States, Mexico, Canada, Puerto Rico and Europe as well as production sourcing and support centers in Asia. Through our supply chain management services and specializes in the process of planning, implementing, and managing the physical flow ofprograms, we supply more than 175,000 globally-sourced production components, many of which are specialized and customized to large multinational manufacturing companies from the point of manufacturing to the point of use. ILS generated net sales of $377.6 million, or 61% of the Company’s net sales, for the year ended December 31, 2003. ILS operates facilities, throughout the United States, Asia, Canada, Puerto Rico, Mexico and Europe. ILS continues to consolidate its network of branches to reduce costs and serve its customers more efficiently.

      Large, multinational manufacturing companies continue to make it a priority to reduce their total cost of production components. Administrative and overhead costs to source, plan, purchase, quality-assure, inventory and handle production components comprise a large portion of total cost. ILS has the size, experience, highly-customized computer system and focus to reduce these costs substantially while providing reliable just-in-time delivery directly to the point of use.meet individual customers’ needs.

     Products and Services.Supply chain management services, which is ILS’ILS’s primary focus for future growth, involves offering customers comprehensive, on-site management for most of their production component needs. Some production components are characterized by low per unit supplier prices relative to the indirect costs of supplier management, quality assurance, inventory management and delivery to the production line. In addition, ILS delivers an increasingly broad range of higher costhigher-cost production components including valves, fittings, steering components and many others. Supply chain management customers receive various value-added services, such as part usage and cost analysis, supplier selection, quality assurance, bar coding, product packaging and tracking, just-in-time delivery, electronic billing services and ongoing technical support. ILS also provides engineering and design services to its customers. Applications-engineering specialists and the direct sales force work closely with the engineering staff of OEM customers to recommend the appropriate production components for a new product or to suggest alternative components that reduce overall production costs, streamline assembly or enhance the appearance or performance of the end product. Recently, ILS also provides asAs an additional service, ILS recently began providing spare parts and aftermarket products to the final end userusers of its customers’ products.

      Supply chain management services are typically provided to customers pursuant to sole-source arrangements. We believe our services distinguish us from traditional buy/sell distributors, as well as manufacturers who supply products directly to customers, because we outsource our customers’ high-volume production components supply chain services contracts. These agreements enable ILS’management, providing processes customized to each customer’s needs and replacing numerous current suppliers with a sole-source relationship. Our highly-developed, customized, information systems provide transparency and flexibility through the complete supply chain. This enables our customers to bothto: (1) significantly reduce procurement coststhe direct and better focus on their core manufacturing competencies by: (i) significantly reducing theindirect cost of production component procurementprocesses by outsourcing many internal purchasing, quality assurance and inventory fulfillment responsibilities; (ii) reducing(2) reduce the amount of working capital invested in inventory; (iii) achievinginventory and floor space; (3) reduce component costs through purchasing efficiencies, including bulk buying and cost reductionssupplier consolidation; and (4) receive technical expertise in production component selection and design and engineering. Our sole-source arrangements foster long-term, entrenched supply relationships with our customers and, as a result, the average tenure of supplier consolidation; and

2


(iv) receiving technical expertise in the selection of production componentsservice for certain manufacturing processes. The Company believes that such agreements foster longer-lasting supply relationships with customers, who increasingly rely onour top 50 ILS for their production component needs, as compared to traditional buy/sell distribution relationships. Sales pursuant to sole-source supply chain service contracts have increased significantly in recent years and represented over 69% of ILS’ sales in 2003. ILS’clients exceeds twelve years. ILS’s remaining non-manufacturing sales are generated through the wholesale supply of industrial products to other manufacturers and distributors pursuant to master or authorized distributor relationships.

      ILS also engineers and manufactures precision cold formed and cold extruded products, including locknuts, SPAC® nuts and wheel hardware, whichthat are principally used in applications where controlled tightening is required due to high vibration. ILS produces both standard items and specialty products to customer specifications whichthat are used in large volumes by customers in the automotive, heavy-duty truck and railroadrail industries.

     Markets and Customers.In 2003, For the year ended December 31, 2004, approximately 88%79% of ILS’ILS’s net sales were to domestic customers. Remaining sales were primarily to manufacturing facilities of large, multinational customers located in Asia, Canada, Mexico and Europe. Supply chain management services and production components are used extensively in a variety of industries, and demand is generally related to the state of the economy and to the overall level of manufacturing activity.

      ILS markets and sells its services to over 7,5006,500 customers domestically and internationally. The principal markets served by ILS are heavy-duty truck, semiconductor equipment,electrical controls, automotive, other vehicle, industrial equipment, aerospace and defense, electrical controls, HVAC, vehicle parts and accessories, appliances, andpower sports equipment, lawn and garden equipmentand semiconductor industries. The five largest customers, within which ILS sells through sole-source contracts to multiple operating divisions or locations, accounted for approximately 32% and 38% of sales of ILS infor 2003 and 2004, respectively, with Navistar International Corp. (“Navistar”)Truck representing 15% and 19%, respectively, of segment sales. Two of the five largest customers are in the heavy-duty truck industry. The loss of the NavistarInternational Truck account or any two of the remaining top five customers could have a material adverse effect on this segment.

     Competition.There are a limited number of companies who compete with ILS for supply chain service contracts. ILS competes mainly with domestic competitors primarily on the basis of its value-added services, which includes sourcing, engineering and delivery capabilities, geographic reach, extensive product selection, price and reputation for high service levels with primarily domestic competitors who are capable of providing supply chain logistics services.levels.

2


Aluminum Products

      The Aluminum Products segment generated net sales of $90.1 million, or 14% of the Company’s net sales, for the year ended December 31, 2003. Management believes Aluminum Products isWe believe that we are one of the few part suppliers that has the capability to provide a wide range of high volume, high qualityhigh-volume, high-quality products utilizing a broad range of processes, including permanent mold, low-pressure, die-cast, sand-cast die-cast and lost-foam, products.as well as a proprietary sub-liquidous process. Our ability to offer our customers this comprehensive range of capabilities at a low cost provides us with a competitive advantage. We produce our aluminum components at six manufacturing facilities in Ohio, Indiana and Wisconsin.

Products and Services. Our Aluminum Products business casts and machines these products at three plants in two states. During the past two years, Aluminum Products substantially improved its operating efficiency by consolidating manufacturing facilities.

      Aluminum Products’ cast aluminum parts are manufacturedengine, transmission, brake, suspension and other components for automotive, agricultural equipment, heavy-duty truck and construction equipment OEMs, primarily located in North America.on a sole-source basis. Aluminum Products’ principal products include:include transmission pump housings, intake manifolds, planetary pinion carriers, oil filter adapters, clutch retainers, bearing cups, brackets, oil pans and flywheel spacers. Aluminum ProductsIn addition, we also providesprovide value-added services such as design engineering, machining drilling, tapping and part assembly. Although these parts are lightweight, they possess high durability and integrity characteristics even under extreme pressure and temperature conditions.

      Demand by automotive OEMs for aluminum castings has increased in recent years as OEMsthey have sought lighter alternatives to heavier steel and iron, components. Lighter aluminum cast componentsprimarily to increase an automobile’s fuel efficiency without decreasingcompromising structural integrity. Management believesWe believe that this replacement trend will continue as end-users and government standards regardingthe regulatory environment require greater fuel efficiency. To capitalize on this trend, in August 2004, we acquired substantially all of the assets of the Amcast Components Group, a producer of aluminum automotive fuel efficiency become increasingly stringent.components. This acquisition significantly increased our production capacity and added attractive new customers, product lines and production technologies. We believe that the acquisition of the Amcast Components Group will significantly increase the net sales of our Aluminum Products business. The historical financial data contained throughout this annual report on Form 10-K exclude the results of operations of the Amcast Components Group other than for the period from August 23, 2004 through December 31, 2004.

Markets and Customers. The five largest customers, of which Aluminum Products sells to multiple operating divisions through sole source

3


sole-source contracts, accounted for approximately 79% of Aluminum Products sales in 2003.for both 2003 and 2004, respectively. The loss of any one of these customers could have a material adverse effect on this segment.

Competition. The domestic aluminum castings industry is highly competitive. Aluminum Products competes principally on the basis of its ability to: (i)(1) engineer and manufacture high quality, cost effective,high-quality, cost-effective, machined castings utilizing multiple casting technologies in large volumes; (ii)(2) provide timely delivery; and (iii)(3) retain the manufacturing flexibility necessary to quickly adjust to the needs of its customers. Although there are a number of smaller domestic companies with aluminum casting capabilities, the customers’ stringent quality and service standards enable only large suppliers with the requisite quality certifications to compete effectively. As one of these suppliers, Aluminum Products is structuredwell-positioned to benefit as customers continue to consolidate their supplier base.

Manufactured Products

      TheOur Manufactured Products segment includesoperates a diverse group of niche manufacturing businesses involved in the manufacturingthat design and manufacture a broad range of highly-engineered products, including induction heating and melting systems, and other capital equipment,pipe threading systems, rubber products and forged and machined products. Manufactured Products generated net sales of $156.6 million, or 25% ofWe manufacture these products in eleven domestic facilities and eight international facilities in Canada, Mexico, the Company’s net sales, for the year ended December 31, 2003. The five largest customers, within which Manufactured Products sells primarily through sole-source contracts to multiple operating divisions, accounted for approximately 17% of Manufactured Products sales in 2003. The loss of business from any one of these customers would not have a material adverse effect on this segment.United Kingdom, Belgium, Germany, China and Japan.

     The Company’sProducts and Services. Our induction heating and melting business Ajax Tocco Magnethermic (“Ajax Tocco”),utilizes proprietary technology and specializes in the engineering, construction, service and repair of induction heating and melting systems, primarily for the steel, coatings, forging, foundry, automotive and construction equipment industries. Ajax Tocco’sOur induction heating and melting systems are engineered and built to customer specifications and are used primarily for melting, heating, and surface hardening of metals and curing of coatings. Approximately half35%-40% of Ajax Tocco’s revenueour induction heating and melting systems’ revenues is derived from the sale of replacement parts and provision of field service, primarily for the installed base of itsour own products. The CompanyWe also producesproduce and provide services and spare parts for other capital equipment includingsuch as pipe threading equipment and related parts for the oil drillingand gas industry, and complete oven systems that combine heat processing and curing technologies with material handlingmechanical forging presses,

3


as well as manufacture injection molded rubber and conveying methods. The Companysilicone products for use in automotive and industrial applications. Our forged and machined products include locomotive crankshafts, aircraft structural components such as landing gears and rail products such as railcar center plates. We also engineersengineer and installsinstall mechanical forging presses for the automotive and truck manufacturing industries and sellssell spare parts and providesprovide field service for the large existing base of mechanical forging presses and hammers in North America. These capital equipment units compete with small to medium-sized domestic and international equipment manufacturers on the basis of service capability, ability to meet customer specifications, delivery performance and engineering expertise.

      The Company manufacturesWe manufacture injection molded rubber and silicone products for use in automotive and industrial applications. The rubber products facilities manufacture products for customers in the automotive, food processing and consumer appliance industries. Their products include wire harnesses, shock and vibration mounts, spark plug boots and nipples and general sealing gaskets. During 2002, the Companywe reduced rubber products’ costs and discontinued underperforming products by selling one business unit and closing onea manufacturing plant.

Markets and Customers. In our Manufactured Products’ capital equipment business, approximately 38% of net sales for the year ended December 31, 2004 was derived from replacement parts and the provision of field service. In addition, we manufacture forged and machined products produced from closed-die metal forgings of up to 6,000 pounds. Aerospace forgings are sold primarily to machining companies and sub-assemblers who finish the products for sale to OEMs. We also machine, induction harden and surface finish crankshafts and camshafts used primarily in locomotives. In the fourth quarter of 2003, we decided to shut down our locomotive crankshaft forging plant and entered into a long-term supply contract to purchase locomotive crankshaft forgings at a more favorable price from a third-party supplier. Forged rail products are sold primarily to railcar builders and maintenance providers. Forged and machined products are sold to a wide variety of domestic and international OEMs and other manufacturing plant. Themanufacturers, primarily in the transportation industries.

Competition. Our capital equipment units compete with small to medium-sized domestic and international equipment manufacturers on the basis of service capability, ability to meet customer specifications, delivery performance and engineering expertise. Our rubber products operating units compete primarily on the basis of price and product quality with other domestic small- to medium-sized manufacturers of injection molded rubber and silicone products.

      The Company manufactures forged and machined products produced from closed-die metal forgings of up to 6,000 pounds. These products include crankshafts, aircraft structural components such as landing gears and rail products such as railcar center plates. Aerospace forgings are sold primarily to machining companies, and sub-assemblers who finish the products for sale to OEMs. The Company also machines, induction hardens and surface finishes crankshafts and camshafts used primarily in locomotives. In fourth quarter 2003, the Company decided to shut down its locomotive crankshaft forging plant, and entered into a long-term supply contract to purchase these forgings at a more favorable price from a third-party supplier. The 2003 restructuring is expected to increase both profitability and cash flow by approximately $15.0 million over the next five years. Forged rail products are sold primarily to railcar builders and maintenance providers. Forged and machined products are sold to a wide variety of

4


domestic and international OEMs and other manufacturers, primarily in the transportation industries. The Company’s Our forged and machined products business competes domestically and internationally with other small- to medium-sized businesses on the basis of product quality and precision.

Sales and Marketing

      ILS markets its products and services in the United States, Mexico, Canada and Europe, primarily through its direct sales force, which is assisted by applications engineers who provide the technical expertise necessary to assist the engineering staff of OEM customers in designing new products and improving existing products. Aluminum Products primarily markets and sells its products in North America through internal sales personnel. Manufactured Products primarily markets and sells its products in North America through both internal sales personnel and independent sales representatives. Induction heating and pipe threading equipment is also marketed and sold in Europe, Asia, Latin America and Northnorthern Africa through both internal sales personnel and independent sales representatives. In some instances, the internal engineering staff assists in the sales and marketing effort through joint design and applications-engineering efforts with major customers.

Raw Materials and Suppliers

      ILS purchases substantially all of its production components from third-party suppliers. Aluminum Products and Manufactured Products purchase substantially all of their raw materials, principally metals and certain component parts incorporated into their products, from third-party suppliers and manufacturers. Management believes that raw materials and component parts other than certain specialty products are available from alternative sources. ILS has multiple sources of supply for its products. Approximately 25%An increasing portion of ILS’ILS’s delivered components are purchased from suppliers in foreign countries, primarily Taiwan, China, South Korea, India and China. The Company isEastern Europe. We are dependent upon the ability of such suppliers to meet stringent quality and performance standards and to conform to delivery schedules. Most raw materials required by Aluminum Products and Manufactured Products are commodity products available from several domestic suppliers.

4


Customer Dependence

      The Company hasWe have thousands of customers who demand quality, delivery and service. Numerous customers have recognized our performance by awarding the Companyus with supplier quality awards. Navistar is the onlyNo customer accountingaccounted for more than 10% of consolidated sales withinin any of the past three years, (onlyexcept for International Truck in the year 2003).2004 and 2003.

Backlog

      Management believes that backlog is not a meaningful measure for ILS, as a majority of ILS’ILS’s customers require just-in-time delivery of production components. Management believes that Aluminum Products’ and Manufactured Products’ backlog as of any particular date is not a meaningful measure of sales for any future period as a significant portion of sales are on a release or firm order basis.

Environmental, Health and Safety Regulations

      The Company isWe are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations designed to protect public health and the environment, (“Environmental Laws”), particularly with regard to discharges and emissions, as well as handling, storage, treatment and disposal, of various substances and wastes. Our failure to comply with applicable environmental laws and regulations and permit requirements could result in civil and criminal fines or penalties or enforcement actions, including regulatory or judicial orders enjoining or curtailing operations or requiring corrective measures. Pursuant to certain Environmental Laws,environmental laws, owners or operators of facilities may be liable for the costs of response or other corrective actions for contamination identified at or emanating from current or former locations, without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of any such contamination, and for related damages to natural resources. Additionally, persons who arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances or materials may be liable

5


for costs of response at sites where they are located, whether or not the site is owned or operated by such person.

      From time to time, we have incurred and are presently incurring costs and obligations for correcting environmental noncompliance and remediating environmental conditions at certain of our properties. In general, the Company haswe have not experienced difficulty in complying with Environmental Lawsenvironmental laws in the past, and compliance with Environmental Lawsenvironmental laws has not had a material adverse effect on the Company’sour financial condition, liquidity and results of operations. The Company’sOur capital expenditures on environmental control facilities were not material during the past five years and such expenditures are not expected to be material to the Companyus in the foreseeable future.

      The Company hasWe are currently, and may in the future, be required to incur costs relating to the investigation or remediation of property, including property where we have disposed of our waste, and for addressing environmental conditions. For instance, we have been identified as a potentially responsible party at third-party sites under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, or comparable state laws, which provide for strict and, under certain circumstances, joint and several liability. The Company isWe are participating in the cost of certain clean-up efforts at several of these sites. The availability of third-party payments or insurance for environmental remediation activities is subject to risks associated with the willingness and ability of the third party to make payments. However, the Company’sour share of such costs has not been material and, based on available information, the Company doeswe do not expect itsour exposure at any of these locations to have a material adverse effect on itsour results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.

Information as to Industry Segment Reporting and Geographic Areas

      The information contained under the heading of “Note L—Industry Segments” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements included herein, relating to (i) net sales, income (loss) before income taxes and change in accounting principles, identifiable assets and other information by industry segment and (ii) net sales and assets by geographic region for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, 2002, and 20012002 is incorporated herein by reference.

Recent Developments

      The information contained under the heading of “Note D—Acquisitions and Dispositions” and “Note N—Restructuring and Unusual Charges”Acquisitions” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements included herein, is incorporated by reference.

Available Information5

      The Company files annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The public can obtain copies of these materials by visiting the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20549, by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330, or by accessing the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, as soon as reasonably practicable after such materials are filed with or furnished to the SEC, the Company makes copies available to the public, free of charge.


Item 2. Properties

       The Company’sAs of December 31, 2004, our operations includeincluded numerous manufacturing and supply chain logistics services facilities located in twenty-three23 states in the United States, and in Puerto Rico, as well as in Asia, Canada, Europe and Mexico. Approximately 91%90% of the available square footage iswas located in the United States. Approximately 49% of the available square footage iswas owned. In 2003,2004, approximately 32%35% of the available domestic square footage was used by the ILS segment, 51%38% was used by the Manufactured Products segment and 17%27% by the Aluminum Products segment. Approximately 33%27% of the available foreign square footage was used by the ILS segment and 67%73% was used by the Manufactured Products segment. In the opinion of management, Park-Ohio’sour facilities are generally well maintained and are suitable and adequate for their intended uses.

6


      The following table provides information relative to theour principal facilities as of Park-Ohio and its subsidiaries.December 31, 2004.

             
Related IndustryOwned orApproximate
SegmentLocationLeasedSquare FootageUse





ILS(1) Cleveland, OH  Leased   41,000(2) ILS Corporate Office
  Dayton, OH  Leased   84,700  Logistics
  Lawrence, PA  Leased   116,000  Logistics and Manufacturing
  St. Paul, MN  Leased   74,425  Logistics
  Atlanta, GA  Leased   56,000  Logistics
  Dallas, TX  Leased   49,985  Logistics
  Nashville, TN  Leased   44,900  Logistics
  Charlotte, NC  Leased   36,800  Logistics
  Kent, OH  Leased   225,000  Manufacturing
  Mississauga, Ontario, Canada  Leased   56,000  Manufacturing
  Solon, OH  Leased   42,600  Logistics
  Cleveland, OH  Leased   40,000  Manufacturing
  Delaware, OH  Owned   45,000  Manufacturing
 
ALUMINUM Conneaut, OH(3)  Leased/Owned   283,800  Manufacturing
PRODUCTS Huntington, IN  Leased   132,000  Manufacturing
  Fremont, IN  Owned   108,000  Manufacturing
  Wapakoneta, OH  Owned   185,000  Manufacturing
  Richmond, IN  Leased/Owned   140,000  Manufacturing
  Cedarburg, WI  Leased   130,000  Manufacturing
 
MANUFACTURED Cuyahoga Hts., OH  Owned   427,000  Manufacturing
PRODUCTS(4) Le Roeulx, Belgium  Owned   120,000  Manufacturing
  Euclid, OH  Owned   154,000  Manufacturing
  Wickliffe, OH  Owned   110,000  Manufacturing
  Boaz, AL  Owned   100,000  Manufacturing
  Warren, OH  Owned   195,000  Manufacturing
  Oxted, England  Owned   135,000  Manufacturing
  Cicero, IL  Owned   450,000  Manufacturing
  Cleveland, OH  Leased   150,000  Manufacturing
  Shanghai, China  Leased   40,000  Manufacturing


Related IndustryOwned orApproximate
SegmentLocationLeasedSquare FootageUse





ILS SEGMENTCleveland, OHLeased41,000*(1) ILS Corporate Office
Dayton, OHLeased84,700Logistics
Lawrence, PALeased116,000Logistics and Manufacturing
St. Paul, MNLeased74,425Logistics
Atlanta, GALeased56,000Logistics
Dallas, TXLeased49,985Logistics
Nashville, TNLeased44,900Logistics
Charlotte, NCLeased36,800Logistics
Kent, OHLeased225,000Manufacturing
Mississauga, Ontario, CanadaLeased56,000Manufacturing
Solon, OHLeased42,600Logistics
Cleveland, OHLeased40,000Manufacturing
Delaware, OHOwned45,000Manufacturing
The ILS Segment has thirty-one31 other facilities, none of which is deemed to be a principal facility of the Company.facility.
 
ALUMINUM(2) Conneaut, OHLeased82,300Manufacturing
PRODUCTSConneaut, OHLeased64,000Manufacturing
SEGMENTConneaut, OHLeased45,700Manufacturing
Conneaut, OHOwned91,800Manufacturing
Huntington, INLeased132,000Manufacturing
Fremont, INOwned108,000ManufacturingIncludes 10,000 square feet used by Park-Ohio Corporate Office.
 
MANUFACTURED(3) Cuyahoga Hts, OHOwned427,000Manufacturing
PRODUCTSLe Roeulx, BelgiumOwned120,000Manufacturing
SEGMENTEuclid, OHOwned154,000ManufacturingIncludes three leased properties with square footage of 82,300, 64,000 and 45,700 and one owned property of 91,800 square feet.
 
(4) Wickliffe, OHOwned110,000Manufacturing
Boaz, ALOwned100,000Manufacturing
Warren, OHOwned195,000Manufacturing
Oxted, EnglandOwned135,000Manufacturing
Cicero, ILOwned450,000Manufacturing
Cleveland, OHLeased150,000Manufacturing
Shanghai, ChinaLeased40,000Manufacturing
The Manufactured Products Segment has sixteen18 other owned and leased facilities, none of which is deemed to be a principal facility of the Company.
*Includes 10,000 square feet used by Park-Ohio Corporate Office.facility.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

       The Company isWe are subject to various pending and threatened lawsuits in which claims for monetary damages are asserted in the ordinary course of business. While any litigation involves an element of uncertainty,

6


in the opinion of management, liabilities, if any, arising from currently pending or threatened litigation will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’sour financial condition, liquidity or results of operations. The Company hasWe have been named as one of many defendants in a number of asbestos-related personal injury lawsuits. The Company’sMost of the cases that have been dismissed were because of a failure to identify an asbestos containing product manufactured by us or a predecessor. Our cost of defending such lawsuits has not been material to date and based upon available information, our management of the Company does not expect the Company’sour future costs for asbestos-related lawsuits to have a material adverse effect on itsour results of operations, liquidity orof financial condition.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

       Information required by this item has been omitted pursuant to General Instruction I of Form 10-K.

7


 

Part II

 
Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common StockEquity, Related Stockholder Matters and Related Security Holder MattersIssuer Purchases of Equity Securities

       The registrant is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. and has no equity securities that trade.

 
Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data

       Information required by this item has been omitted pursuant to General Instruction I of Form 10-K.

 
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

       TheOur consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The historical financial information is not directly comparable on a year-to-year basis, primarily due to debt extinguishment costs and writeoff of deferred financing costs associated with the tender and early redemption during 2004 of our 9.25% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2007, restructuring and unusual charges in all three years,2002 and 2003, a goodwill impairment charge in 2002 to reflect the cumulative effect of an accounting change, and acquisitions and divestitures during the elimination of goodwill amortization starting in 2002, divestitures and acquisitions.three years ended December 31, 2004.

Executive Overview

      The Company operates throughWe are an industrial supply chain logistics and diversified manufacturing business, operating in three segments,segments: ILS, Aluminum Products and Manufactured Products. ILS is a leading supply chain logistics provider of production components to large, multinational manufacturers. In connectionprovides customers with the supply of such production components, ILS provides a variety of value-added, cost-effectiveintegrated supply chain management services.services for a broad range of high-volume, specialty production components. ILS customers receive various value-added services, such as engineering and design services, part usage and cost analysis, supplier selection, quality assurance, bar coding, product packaging and tracking, just-in-time and point-of use delivery, electronic billing and ongoing technical support. The principal customers of ILS are in the heavy-duty truck, semiconductor equipment,electrical controls, automotive and other vehicle, industrial equipment, aerospace and defense, electrical controls, HVAC, vehicle parts and accessories, appliances, andpower sports equipment, lawn and garden equipment, and semiconductor equipment industries. Aluminum Products manufactures castcasts and machines aluminum engine, transmission, brake, suspension and other components primarily for automotive, manufactures,agricultural equipment, construction equipment and heavy-duty truck OEMs, primarily on a sole-source basis. Aluminum Products also provides value-added services such as design and engineering machining and assembly. Manufactured Products operates a diverse group of niche manufacturing businesses that design and manufacture a broad range of high qualityhighly-engineered products engineeredincluding induction heating and melting systems, pipe threading systems, industrial oven systems, rubber products, and forged and machined products. Manufactured Products also produces and provides services and spare parts for specific customer applications.the equipment it manufactures. The principal customers of Manufactured Products are OEMs and end-users in the steel, automotive, oil and gas, rail, and aerospace automotive, steel, forging, railroad, truck, oil, food processing and consumer appliancedefense industries. Sales, earnings and other relevant financial data for these three segments are provided in Note L to the consolidated financial statements.

      The Company is positioned forDuring 2004, we experienced the increased sales and profitability in 2004 and beyond,previously forecast, as the manufacturing economy stabilizes and returnsreturned to growth, particularly in twothree of our customer industries: heavy-duty truck; semiconductor equipment; and equipment for steel manufacturing. Net sales increased 30% compared to 2003. Profitability increased more than proportionally to sales, based on cost reductions from our restructuring during the Company’s significant customer segments, heavy-duty truck and semiconductor equipment. The Company grew strongly from 1993 through the first half of 2000 (see table below), through both internal growth and acquisition. Startingdownturn in the second half of 2000, both sales and profitability declined due to overall weakness in the manufacturing economy, and particularly to contraction in the heavy-duty truck and automotive industries. Despite these sales declines, the Company retained or gained market share in most major markets served. The Company’s sales stabilized in2001, 2002 and declined only slightly in 2003, and pretax income began to recover.

                         
199319992000200120022003






Net sales $94.5  $717.2  $754.7  $636.4  $634.5  $624.3 
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Restructuring and impairment charges              28.5   19.2   19.4 
Non-recurring gains / losses (pretax)          10.1   1.8         
Income (loss) before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change $3.9  $28.4  $7.7  $(37.4) $(11.5) $(10.9)

8


     The Company responded to the economic downturn by reducing costs, increasing prices on targeted products, restructuring many of its businesses and selling non-core manufacturing assets.2003. During 2001 through 2003, the Companythose years, we consolidated 28 supply chain logistics facilities, and closed or sold 11 manufacturing plants. With regard to these actions, the Company recorded restructuring

      During 2004, we reinforced our long-term availability and impairment charges in 2001, 2002attractive pricing of funds by refinancing both of our major sources of borrowed funds: senior subordinated notes and 2003 (see table above and Note N to the consolidated financial statements). Management’s actions aimed to increase operational earnings during the economic downturn and position the Company for increased profitability when the manufacturing economy stabilizes and returns to growth. These actions resulted in increased income (as adjusted) in 2002 and 2003 despite flat to declining sales.

      The Company’s 2003 non-cash restructuring and impairment charges totaled $19.4our revolving credit agreement. In November 2004, we sold $210.0 million of which 90%8.375% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014. We used the net proceeds to fund the tender and early redemption of $199.9 million of our 9.25% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2007. We incurred debt extinguishment costs primarily related to restructuring ofpremiums and other transaction costs associated with the Forge Group, primarily impairment of propertytender and equipment idled whenearly redemption and wrote off deferred financing costs totaling $6.0 million associated with the Company began purchasing crankshaft forgings instead of manufacturing them internally. Charges outside the Forge Group, totaling $1.9 million, consisted primarily of pension withdrawal charges for manufacturing units executing previously announced restructuring. The 2003 restructuring is expected to increase both profitability and cash flow by approximately $15.0 million over the next five years.repurchased senior subordinated notes.

8


      In July 2003, the Company entered into a four-year bankDecember 2004, we amended our revolving credit agreement, under whichextending its maturity to six years so that it now expires in December 2010, increasing the credit limit so that we may borrow up to $165.0$200.0 million subject to an asset based formula. Theformula, and providing lower interest rate levels. Borrowings under the credit agreement isare secured by substantially all the assetsour assets. We had approximately $53.9 million of the Company. The Company has paid down its revolving bank borrowings by $53.0 million, or 34%, from $154.0 million at June 30, 2001 to $101.0 millionunused borrowing availability at December 31, 2003, when it had approximately $47.0 million of excess borrowing availability. The Company’s $199.9 million of outstanding Senior Subordinated Notes mature in November, 2007.2004. Funds provided by operations plus available borrowings under the bankrevolving credit facilityagreement are expected to be adequate to meet the Company’sour cash requirements until 2007, by which time management expects to have entered into replacement financing agreements.requirements.

      The CompanyWe acquired substantially all of the assets of the Amcast Components Group on August 23, 2004 for $10.0 million cash and the assumption of approximately $9.0 million of operating liabilities. We sold substantially all the assets of St. Louis Screw and Green Bearing in first quarter 2003, for cash totaling approximately $7.3 million, and Castle Rubber Company in second quarter 2002, for cash of approximately $2.5 million. The CompanyWe purchased substantially all the assets of Ajax Magnethermic Corp. in third quarter 2002, for cash of approximately $5.5 million. The Company sold substantially all the assets of Cleveland City Forge in fourth quarter 2001, for cash of approximately $6.1 million. During 2001, the Company expensed $1.9 million of non-recurring business interruption costs, caused by the June 2000 fire that destroyed the Cicero Flexible Products plant, which were not covered by insurance.

Accounting Changes and Goodwill

      On January 1, 2002, the Companywe adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“FAS 142”). Under FAS 142, the Companywe reviewed its goodwill and other intangible assets and recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $48.8 million, which was recorded as the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle effective January 1, 2002. Circumstances which led to this goodwill impairment included reduced sales, profitability and growth rates of the units with goodwill (see Note C to the consolidated financial statements), and reduced transaction prices for comparable businesses, which were themselves results of the downturn in the manufacturing economy. The effects of these circumstances on the Company’sour operations, financial condition and liquidity are reflected in 2002 and 2003 results. The goodwill impairment itself did not have any effect on operations. Under FAS 142, goodwill was not amortized, starting in 2003 or 2002, compared to $3.7 million in 2001.2002.

      In accordance with FAS 142, goodwill is now reviewed annually for potential impairment. This review was performed as of October 1, 2004, 2003 and 2002, using forecasted discounted cash flows, and it was determined that no further impairment is required.

      At December 31, 2003,2004, the balance sheet reflected $82.3$82.6 million of goodwill in the ILS and Aluminum Products segments. In 2003,2004, discount rates

9


used ranged from 11%10.25% to 13%12.25%, and long-term revenue growth rates used ranged from 3.5% to 4.0%.

      In the ILS segment, over the next five years, higher sales growth rates were forecasted and operating profit margins were forecasted to improve to historical levels, as the manufacturing economy rebounds and reduced fixed overheads are absorbed over higher sales volumes.

      The Company2003, we changed itsour method of accounting for the 15% of its inventories utilizing the LIFO method to the FIFO method. As required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, the Company has restated its balance sheet as of December 31, 2002 to increaseand increased inventories by the recorded LIFO reserve ($4.4 million), increaseincreased deferred tax liabilities ($1.7 million), and increaseincreased shareholders’ equity ($2.7 million). Previously reported results of operations havewere not been restated because the impact of utilizing the LIFO method had an insignificant impact on the Company’s reported amounts for consolidated net income (loss). See also Note B to the consolidated financial statements.

Results of Operations

2004 versus 2003 versus 2002
 
Net Sales by Segment:
                 
Percent
20032002ChangeChange




ILS $377.6  $398.1  $(20.5)  -5%
Aluminum products  90.1   106.1   (16.0)  -15%
Manufactured products  156.6   130.2   26.4   20%
   
   
   
     
Consolidated Net Sales $624.3  $634.4  $(10.1)  -2%
   
   
   
     
                     
Year Ended
December 31,Acquired/

Percent(Divested)
20042003ChangeChangeSales





ILS $453.2  $377.6  $75.6   20% $(1.0)
Aluminum Products  135.4   90.1   45.3   50%  30.4 
Manufactured Products  220.1   156.6   63.5   41%  15.9 
   
   
   
       
 
Consolidated net sales $808.7  $624.3  $184.4   30% $45.3 
   
   
   
       
 

      Net sales increased by 30% in 2004, compared to 2003. ILS sales increased due to general economic growth, in particular due to significant growth in the heavy-duty truck and semiconductor industries, the addition of new customers, and increases in product range to existing customers. ILS growth was partially offset by a $1.0 million sales decrease related to the 2003 sale of Green Bearing. Aluminum

9


Products 2004 sales increased $30.4 million due to the Amcast Components Group acquisition in August 2004, with additional growth from new contracts and increased volumes in the existing business. Manufactured Products sales increased primarily in the induction equipment, pipe threading equipment and forging businesses. Of this increase, $15.9 million was due to the second quarter 2004 acquisition of the remaining 66% of the common stock of Jamco, partially offset by the divestiture of St. Louis Screw in the first quarter of 2003.
Cost of Products Sold & Gross Profit:
                 
Year Ended
December 31,

Percent
20042003ChangeChange




Consolidated cost of products sold $682.6  $527.6  $155.0   29%
Consolidated gross profit $126.1  $96.7  $29.4   30%
Gross margin  15.6%  15.5%        

      Cost of products sold increased 29% in 2004 compared to 2003, while gross margin increased to 15.6% from 15.5% in 2003. ILS gross margin decreased modestly, primarily due to steel price increases and mix changes, and the negative impact of $1.1 million resulting from the bankruptcy of a significant customer, Murray, Inc. Aluminum Products gross margin decreased due to a combination of the addition of lower-margin Amcast business, product mix and pricing changes, and specific one-time costs incurred in 2004 for product startup, scrap and reserves. The $30.4 million of sales from the acquired Amcast business generated significantly lower margins than the existing Aluminum Products business. We expect margins at the acquired plants to increase over time, as a result of post-acquisition cost reductions, price increases and new business. Gross margin in the Manufactured Products segment increased, primarily as a result of increased sales and overhead efficiencies achieved in the induction equipment, pipe threading equipment and forging businesses. Gross margins in both the Aluminum Products and Manufactured Products segments were negatively impacted by rising natural gas costs.

Selling, General & Administrative (“SG&A”) Expenses:
                 
Year Ended
December 31,

Percent
20042003ChangeChange




Consolidated SG&A expenses $76.7  $62.4  $14.3   23%
SG&A as a percent of sales  9.5%  10.0%        

      Consolidated SG&A expenses increased by 23% in 2004 compared to 2003. Approximately $5.5 million of the SG&A increase was due to acquisitions, primarily Jamco and Amcast Components Group, and compliance costs associated with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, while the remainder was primarily due to increased sales and production volumes. Despite this increase, SG&A expenses as a percent of sales decreased by 50 basis points due both to cost reductions from restructuring and to the absorption of these expenses over increased sales. SG&A expenses were reduced in 2004 compared to 2003 by a $2.3 million increase in net pension credits reflecting improved returns on pension plan assets.

Interest Expense:
                 
Year Ended
December 31,

Percent
20042003ChangeChange




Interest expense $31.4  $26.2   $5.2   20%
Debt extinguishment costs included in interest expense $6.0             
Average outstanding borrowings $328.9  $320.8   $8.1   3%
Average borrowing rate  7.74%  8.15% (41) basis points    

      Interest expense increased in 2004 compared to 2003, primarily due to the fourth quarter 2004 debt extinguishment costs. These costs primarily related to premiums and other transaction costs associated with the tender and early redemption and writeoff of deferred financing costs associated with the 9.25% Senior Subordinated Notes. Excluding these costs, interest decreased due to lower average interest rates in 2004, partially offset by higher average outstanding borrowings. The lower average

10


borrowing rate in 2004 was due primarily to decreased rates on our revolving credit agreement. The increase in average borrowings in 2004 resulted primarily from higher working capital requirements.
Income Tax:

      The effective income tax rate for 2004 was 19%. Primarily foreign and certain state income taxes were provided for in both years, because federal income taxes were not owed due to the recognition of net operating loss carryforwards for which valuation allowances had been provided. At December 31, 2004, our subsidiaries had $47.7 million of net operating loss carryforwards for federal tax purposes. We have not recognized any tax benefit for these loss carryforwards. In accordance with the provision of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 (“FAS 109”), “Accounting for Income Taxes,” we recorded no tax benefit for the 2003 net loss because we had incurred three years of cumulative losses. Income taxes of $.9 million were provided in 2003, primarily for state and foreign taxes on profitable operations.

2003 versus 2002
Net Sales by Segment:
                 
Year Ended
December 31,

Percent
20032002ChangeChange




ILS $377.6  $398.1  $(20.5)  -5%
Aluminum products  90.1   106.1   (16.0)  -15%
Manufactured products  156.6   130.2   26.4   20%
   
   
   
     
Consolidated net sales $624.3  $634.4  $(10.1)  -2%
   
   
   
     

      Net sales declined by 2% in 2003. $10.4 million of the ILS sales decline related to the sale of Green Bearing and the termination of thea high-margin pharmaceutical sales contract, while the remainder reflected general economic weakness. Aluminum Products net sales were lower primarily due to the ending of $10.0 million of sales contracts, the majority of which relate to the closure of the Tupelo and Hudson plants. Manufactured Products net sales increased $26.4 million primarily in the induction business. The acquisition of Ajax Magnethermic increased 2003 net sales by $29.6 million and the divestiture of Castle Rubber and St. Louis Screw decreased 2003 net sales by $6.8 million.

Cost of Products Sold & Gross Profit:
                
                       Year Ended
20032002December 31,
PercentGrossGross
20032002ChangeChangeMarginMargin20032002ChangePercent










Consolidated cost of products sold $527.6 $546.9 $(19.3) -4%  $527.6 $546.9  $(19.3)  -4% 
 
 
 
 
Inventory writedowns from restructuring included in Cost of Products Sold 0.6 5.6 (5.0)   0.6  5.6  (5.0)    
Net gross profit impact of acquisition & divestitures (4.4) (4.4)   (4.4)     (4.4)    
Consolidated gross profit $96.7 $87.6 $9.1 10% 15.5% 13.8% $96.7 $87.6  $ 9.1  10% 
Gross margin  15.5%  13.8%       

Note: 25% of increase in Induction gross profit attributed to non-acquisition actions.

      Cost of products sold declined 4% in 2003, and gross profit increased 10%, while gross margin increased to 15.5% in 2003, from 13.8% in 2002. ILS gross margin decreased primarily due to reduced absorption of fixed overhead over a smaller sales base and the positive effect on 2002 of the early termination of a high marginhigh-margin pharmaceutical sales contract, partially offset by lower inventory costs, facility costs and other cost reductions. Aluminum Products gross margin increased significantly, primarily as a result of restructuring and cost reductions and higher margins on new contracts. Gross margin in the Manufactured Products segment increased, primarily as a result of increased sales and overhead efficiencies achieved in the induction business.

1011


 

Selling, General & Administrative (“SG&A”)

SG&A Expenses:
                   
                   Year Ended
20032002December 31,20032002
PercentSG&ASG&A
PercentSG&ASG&A
20032002ChangeChangePercentPercent20032002ChangeChangePercentPercent












Consolidated SG&A expenses $62.4 $57.4 $5.0 9% 10.0% 9.1% $62.4 $57.4 $5.0  9%  10.0%  9.1%
Net SG&A expense impact of acquisition & divestitures (3.9) (3.9)   (3.9)     (3.9)          

      Consolidated SG&A expenses increased by 9%8% in 2003, while SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales increased to 10.0% for 2003 compared to 9.1% for 2002. This increase was due primarily to the net impact of acquisitions and divestitures and the $2.6 million reduction of net pension credits reflecting less favorable returns on pension plan assets, partially offset by reductions in other SG&A costs in all three segments.

Interest Expense:
                
Year Ended
December 31,
                
20032002ChangePercent20032002ChangePercent








Interest expense $26.2 $27.6 $ (1.4) -5%  $26.2 $27.6  $(1.4)  -5% 
Average outstanding borrowings $320.8 $333.6 $(12.8) -4%  $320.8 $333.6  $(12.8)  -4% 
Average borrowing rate 8.15% 8.28% (13) basis points   8.15%  8.28% (13) basis points    

      Interest expense decreased by 5% due to lower average debt outstanding and lower average interest rates during 2003. The decrease in average borrowings resulted primarily from the sale of two manufacturing units and lower working capital requirements. The lower average borrowing rate in 2003 was due primarily to decreased rates on the Company’s new revolving credit facility,agreement, beginning in August 2003.

Income Tax:

      In accordance with the provision of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.FAS 109, (“FAS 109”), “Accounting for Income Taxes,” the Company recorded no tax benefit for the 2003 or 2002 net losses, because in both years it had incurred three years of cumulative losses. Income taxes of $.9 million were provided in 2003 and 2002, primarily for state and foreign taxes on profitable operations. At December 31, 2003, subsidiaries of the Company had $35.7 million of net operating loss carryforwards for federal tax purposes. The Company has not recognized any tax benefit for these loss carryforwards.

2002 versus 2001

Net Sales by Segment:

                 
Percent
20022001ChangeChange




ILS $398.1  $416.9  $(18.8)  -5%
Aluminum products  106.1   84.9   21.2   25%
Manufactured products  130.2   134.6   (4.4)  -3%
   
   
   
     
Consolidated Net Sales $634.4  $636.4  $(2.0)  0%
   
   
   
     

      Net sales declined less than 1% in 2002. The ILS net sales decline of 5% was due primarily to the sales volume reductions in heavy truck and other customer industries. The Aluminum Products net sales increase of 25% was due primarily to the initiation or ramp-up of new production contracts. The Manufactured Products net sales decline of 3% or $4.4 million was due primarily to divestitures. The divestitures of Castle Rubber and Cleveland City Forge decreased 2002 net sales by $13.0 million and the acquisition of Ajax Magnethermic increased 2002 net sales by $6.1 million.

11


Cost of Products Sold & Gross Profit:

                         
20022001
PercentGrossGross
20022001ChangeChangeMarginMargin






Consolidated cost of products sold $546.9  $552.3  $(5.4)  -1%        
   
   
   
             
Inventory writedowns from restructuring included in Cost of Products Sold  5.6   10.3   (4.7)            
Net gross profit impact of acquisition & divestitures  1.7       1.7             
Consolidated gross profit $87.6  $84.1  $3.5   4%  13.8%  13.2%

      Cost of products sold declined 1% in 2002. Inventory write-downs included in cost of products sold primarily related to discontinued product lines. Gross profit increased 4% in 2002, while gross margin increased to 13.8% in 2002, from 13.2% in 2001. This increase reflected increased margins in Aluminum Products, partially offset by decreased margins in the ILS and Manufactured Products segments. Declines in ILS and Manufactured Products gross margins related primarily to reduced volumes resulting in the absorption of fixed operational overheads over a smaller sales or production base. The increase in Aluminum Products gross margin related to new, higher-margin contracts, discontinuation of low margin contracts, cost reductions, plant closures and the absorption of fixed manufacturing overheads over a larger production base.

Selling, General & Administrative (“SG&A”) Expenses:

                         
20022001
PercentSG&ASG&A
20022001ChangeChangePercentPercent






Consolidated SG&A expenses $57.4  $66.1  $(8.7)  -13%  9.1%  10.4%

      Consolidated SG&A expenses decreased by 13% in 2002, while SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased to 9.1% during 2002 as compared to 10.4% for 2001. This decrease was primarily due to cost reductions in all three segments resulting from business restructuring initiatives implemented by the Company. During 2003, SG&A expenses were negatively affected by a decrease in net pension credits of $.8 million, reflecting less favorable investment returns on pension plan assets.

Interest Expense:

                 
20022001ChangePercent




Interest expense $27.6  $31.1   $ (3.5)  -11%
Average outstanding borrowings $333.6  $353.4   $(19.8)  -6%
Average borrowing rate  8.28%  8.80% (52) basis points    

      Interest expense decreased by 11% in 2002 due to lower average debt outstanding and lower average interest rates. The decrease in borrowings related primarily to working capital reductions in the course of 2001, which were retained in 2002. The lower average borrowing rate in 2002 was due primarily to decreased rates on the Company’s revolving credit facility.

      In accordance with the provision of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 (“FAS 109”), “Accounting for Income Taxes,” the Company recorded no tax benefit for the 2003 net loss, because it had incurred three years of cumulative losses. Income taxes of $.9 million were provided in 2003, primarily for state and foreign taxes on profitable operations. The effective tax rate for 2001 was 30.5%, which was less than the statutory rate due to the amortization of non-deductible goodwill and other non-deductible items. At December 31, 2003, subsidiaries of the Company had $25.6 million of net operating loss carryforwards for federal tax purposes. The Company has not recognized any tax benefit for these loss carryforwards.

12


Critical Accounting Policies

      Preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”)GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions which affect amounts reported in the Company’sour consolidated financial statements. Management has made their best estimates and judgments of certain amounts included in the financial statements, giving due consideration to materiality. The Company doesWe do not believe that there is great likelihood that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions related to the accounting policies described below. However, application of these accounting policies involves the exercise of judgment and use of assumptions as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could differ from these estimates.

     Revenue Recognition:The Company recognizes We recognize more than 95%93% of itsour revenue when title is transferred to unaffiliated customers, typically upon shipment. The Company’sOur remaining revenue, from long-term contracts, is recognized using the percentage of completion method of accounting. Selling prices are fixed based on purchase orders or contractual arrangements. The Company’sOur revenue recognition policies are in accordance with the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 101, “Revenue Recognition.”

     Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts Receivable:Accounts receivable have been reduced by an allowance for amounts that may become uncollectible in the future. Allowances are developed by the individual operating units based on historical losses, adjusting for economic conditions. The Company’sOur policy is to identify and reserve for specific collectibility concerns based on customers’ financial condition and payment history. The establishment of reserves requires the use of judgment and assumptions regarding

12


the potential for losses on receivable balances. Writeoffs of accounts receivable have historically been low.

     Allowance for Obsolete and Slow Moving Inventory:Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value and have been reduced by an allowance for obsolete and slow-moving inventories. The estimated allowance is based on management’s review of inventories on hand with minimal sales activity, over the past twelve months, which is compared to estimated future usage and sales. Inventories identified by management as slow-moving or obsolete are reserved for based on estimated selling prices less disposal costs. Though the Company considerswe consider these allowances adequate and proper, changes in economic conditions in specific markets in which the Company operateswe operate could have a material effect on reserve allowances required.

     Impairment of Long-Lived Assets:Long-lived assets are reviewed by management for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable. During 2003, 2002 and 2001, the Company decided to exit certain under-performing product lines and to close or consolidate certain operating facilities and, accordingly, recorded restructuring and impairment charges as discussed above and in Note N to the consolidated financial statements.statements included elsewhere herein.

     Restructuring:The Company recognizes We recognize costs in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs incurred in a Restructuring)” (“EITF 94-3”), and the SEC Staff Accounting BulletinSAB No. 100, “Restructuring and Impairment Charges” for charges prior to 2003. Detailed contemporaneous documentation is maintained and updated on a quarterly basis to ensure that accruals are properly supported. If management determines that there is a change in the estimate, the accruals are adjusted to reflect the changes.

      In 2003, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities” (“FAS 146”), which nullified EITF 94-3 and requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized and measured initially at the fair value only when the liability is incurred. FAS 146 has no effect on charges recorded for exit activities begun prior to 2002.

13


     Goodwill:Through December 31, 2001, the Company amortized goodwill primarily over forty years using the straight-line method. The Company We adopted Financial Accounting Standard (“FAS”) No.FAS 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” as of January 1, 2002. Under FAS 142, the Company no longer amortizes goodwill, but iswe are required to review goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently if impairment indicators arise.

      The Company, with assistance of an outside consultant,We completed the transitional impairment review of goodwill during the fourth quarter of 2002 and recorded a non-cash charge of $48.8 million. The charge has been reported as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. The Company hasWe have also completed the annual impairment test as of October 1, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and hashave determined that no additional goodwill impairment existed as of those dates.

     Deferred Income Tax Assets and Liabilities:The Company accounts We account for income taxes under the liability method, whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between the financial reporting and the tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the currently enacted tax rates. In determining these amounts, management determined the probability of realizing deferred tax assets, taking into consideration factors including historical operating results, expectations of future earnings and taxable income and the extended period of time over which the postretirement benefits will be paid.

      At December 31, 2003,2004, the Company hashad net operating loss carryforwards for income tax purposes of approximately $35.7$47.7 million, which will expire inbetween 2021 or 2023and 2024. In accordance with the provisions of FAS 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”, the tax benefits related to these carryforwards have been fully reserved as of December 31, 2003 since2004 because the Company is in a three yearthree-year cumulative loss position.

     Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans:The Company We and itsour subsidiaries have pension plans, principally noncontributory defined benefit or noncontributory defined contribution plans and postretirement benefit plans covering substantially all employees. The measurement of liabilities related to these plans is based on management’s assumptions related to future events, including interest rates, return on pension plan assets, rate of compensation increases and health care cost trends. Pension plan asset performance in the future will directly impact our net income of the Company. The Company hasincome. We have evaluated itsour pension and other postretirement benefit assumptions, considering current trends in interest rates and market conditions and believes itsbelieve our assumptions are appropriate.

13


Seasonality; Variability of Operating Results

      The Company’sOur results of operations are typically stronger in the first six months rather than the last six months of each calendar year due to scheduled plant maintenance in the third quarter to coincide with customer plant shutdowns and due to holidays in the fourth quarter.

      The timing of orders placed by the Company’sour customers has varied with, among other factors, orders for customers’ finished goods, customer production schedules, competitive conditions and general economic conditions. The variability of the level and timing of orders has, from time to time, resulted in significant periodic and quarterly fluctuations in the operations of the Company’sour business units. Such variability is particularly evident at the capital equipment businesses, included in the Manufactured Products segment, which typically ship a few large systems per year.

Forward-Looking Statements

      This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains certain statements that are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Certain statements in this Management’s DiscussionThe words “believes”, “anticipates”, “plans”, “expects”, “intends”, “estimates” and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations containsimilar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements including without limitation, discussion regarding the Company’s anticipated amounts of restructuring chargesinvolve known and its expected impact on profitability and cash flow, credit availability, levels and funding of capital expenditures and trends for 2004. Forward-looking statements are necessarily subject tounknown risks, uncertainties and other factors many of which are

14


outsidethat may cause our control, which could cause actual results, performance and achievements, or industry results, to differbe materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward looking statements. These uncertainties and other factors include such things as: general business conditions and competitive factors, including pricing pressures and product innovation; demand for our products and services; raw material availability and pricing; changes in the our relationships with customers and suppliers; the financial condition of our customers, including the impact of any bankruptcies; our ability to successfully integrate recent and future acquisitions into existing operations; changes in general domestic economic conditions such as inflation rates, interest rates, tax rates and adverse impacts to us, our suppliers and customers from acts of terrorism or hostilities; our ability to meet various covenants, including financial covenants, contained in our revolving credit agreement and the indenture governing the Senior Subordinated Notes; increasingly stringent domestic and foreign governmental regulations, including those affecting the environment; inherent uncertainties involved in assessing our potential liability for environmental remediation-related activities; the outcome of pending and future litigation and other claims; dependence on the automotive and heavyheavy-duty truck industries;industries, which are highly cyclical; dependence on key management; and dependence on information systems. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In light of these and other uncertainties, the inclusion of a forward-looking statement herein should not be regarded as a representation by us that our plans and objectives will be achieved.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

15       We are exposed to market risk including changes in interest rates. We are subject to interest rate risk on our floating rate revolving credit facility, which consisted of borrowings of $120.6 million at December 31, 2004. A 100 basis point increase in the interest rate would have resulted in an increase in interest expense of approximately $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2004.

      Our foreign subsidiaries generally conduct business in local currencies. During 2004, we recorded a favorable foreign currency translation adjustment of $2.1 million related to net assets located outside the United States. This foreign currency translation adjustment resulted primarily from the weakening of the United States dollar in relation to the Canadian dollar, British pound and euro. Our foreign operations are also subject to other customary risks of operating in a global environment, such as unstable political situations, the effect of local laws and taxes, tariff increases and regulations and requirements for export licenses, the potential imposition of trade or foreign exchange restrictions and transportation delays.

      Our largest exposures to commodity prices relate to steel and natural gas price increases, which have increased significantly in 2004. We do not have any commodity swap agreements or hedge contracts for future increases in steel or natural gas prices.

14


 

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Financial Data

     
Page

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting16
Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent AuditorsRegistered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting  17
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm18 
Consolidated Balance Sheets — December 31, 20032004 and 2002.2003  1819 
Consolidated Statements of Operations — Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 2002 and 20012002  1920 
Consolidated Statements of Shareholder’s Equity — Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 2002 and 2001.2002  2021 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 2002 and 20012002  2122 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  2223 

15


MANAGEMENT’S ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

      The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Company’s management carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the last fiscal year. The framework on which such evaluation was based is contained in the report entitled “Internal Control — Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the “COSO Report”). Based upon the evaluation described above under the framework contained in the COSO Report, the Company’s management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2004. Management has identified no material weakness in internal control over financial reporting.

      Ernst & Young LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the Company’s management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004. This attestation report is included at page 17 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Park-Ohio Industries, Inc.

March 10, 2005

16


 

REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORSREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Shareholder

Park-Ohio Industries, Inc.

      We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

      We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

      A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

      Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

      In our opinion, management’s assessment that Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on the COSO criteria.

      We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 and our report dated March 10, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Cleveland, Ohio

March 10, 2005

17


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Shareholder

Park-Ohio Industries, Inc.

      We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.) as of December 31, 20032004 and 2002,2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholder’s equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003.2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

      We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted inof the United States.Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

      In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 20032004 and 20022003 and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20032004 in conformity with accounting principlesU.S. generally accepted in the United States.accounting principles.

      As discussed in Note B to the consolidated financial statements, effective June 30, 2003, the Company changed its method of accounting for inventories at certain subsidiaries. As discussed in Note C to the consolidated financial statements, in 2002 the Company changed its method of accounting for goodwill.

      We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in the Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 10, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Cleveland, Ohio

March 9, 200410, 2005

1718


 

Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

           
December 31

20032002


(Dollars in thousands)
ASSETS
        
Current Assets        
 Cash and cash equivalents $2,191  $8,800 
 Accounts receivable, less allowances for doubtful accounts of $3,271 in 2003 and $3,313 in 2002.  100,938   101,477 
 Inventories  149,075   156,067 
 Other current assets  16,155   12,181 
   
   
 
  Total Current Assets  268,359   278,525 
Property, Plant and Equipment        
 Land and land improvements  2,891   2,416 
 Buildings  40,774   36,809 
 Machinery and equipment  181,045   187,201 
   
   
 
   224,710   226,426 
 Less accumulated depreciation  129,434   114,260 
   
   
 
   95,276   112,166 
Other Assets        
 Goodwill  82,278   81,464 
 Net assets held for sale  2,321   19,205 
 Other  61,310   51,583 
   
   
 
  $509,544  $542,943 
   
   
 
  
LIABILITIES and SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
        
Current Liabilities        
 Trade accounts payable $66,153  $74,868 
 Accrued expenses  46,384   48,839 
 Current portion of long-term liabilities  2,811   3,056 
   
   
 
  Total Current Liabilities  115,348   126,763 
Long-Term Liabilities, less current portion        
 9.25% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2007.  199,930   199,930 
 Revolving credit  101,000   114,000 
 Other long-term debt  8,234   9,886 
 Other postretirement benefits and other long-term liabilities  26,671   27,312 
   
   
 
   335,835   351,128 
Shareholder’s Equity        
 Common stock, par value $1 a share  -0-   -0- 
 Additional paid-in capital  64,844   64,844 
 Retained earnings  (3,219)  8,304 
 Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (3,264)  (8,096)
   
   
 
   58,361   65,052 
   
   
 
  $509,544  $542,943 
   
   
 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

18


Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations

               
Year Ended December 31

200320022001



(Dollars in thousands)
Net sales $624,295  $634,455  $636,417 
Cost of products sold  527,586   546,857   552,293 
   
   
   
 
 Gross profit  96,709   87,598   84,124 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  62,369   57,418   66,114 
Amortization of goodwill  -0-   -0-   3,733 
Restructuring and impairment charges  18,808   13,601   18,163 
   
   
   
 
 Operating income (loss)  15,532   16,579   (3,886)
Non-operating items, net  -0-   -0-   1,850 
Interest expense  26,151   27,623   31,108 
   
   
   
 
  Loss before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change  (10,619)  (11,044)  (36,844)
Income taxes (benefit)  904   897   (11,400)
   
   
   
 
  Loss before cumulative effect of accounting change  (11,523)  (11,941)  (25,444)
Cumulative effect of accounting change  -0-   (48,799)  -0- 
   
   
   
 
  Net loss $(11,523) $(60,740) $(25,444)
   
   
   
 
           
December 31,

20042003


(Dollars in thousands)
ASSETS
        
Current Assets        
 Cash and cash equivalents $6,407  $2,191 
 Accounts receivable, less allowances for doubtful accounts of $3,976 in 2004 and $3,271 in 2003  145,475   100,938 
 Inventories  177,294   149,075 
 Other current assets  20,655   16,155 
   
   
 
  Total Current Assets  349,831   268,359 
Property, Plant and Equipment        
 Land and land improvements  6,788   6,059 
 Buildings  36,217   37,606 
 Machinery and equipment  185,489   181,045 
   
   
 
   228,494   224,710 
 Less accumulated depreciation  118,613   129,434 
   
   
 
   109,881   95,276 
Other Assets        
 Goodwill  82,565   82,278 
 Net assets held for sale  1,035   2,321 
 Other  68,535   61,310 
   
   
 
  $611,847  $509,544 
   
   
 
 
  
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
        
Current Liabilities        
 Trade accounts payable $108,862  $66,153 
 Accrued expenses  59,745   46,384 
 Current portion of long-term liabilities  5,812   2,811 
   
   
 
  Total Current Liabilities  174,419   115,348 
Long-Term Liabilities, less current portion        
 8.375% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014  210,000   -0- 
 9.25% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2007  -0-   199,930 
 Revolving credit  120,600   101,000 
 Other long-term debt  4,776   8,234 
 Other postretirement benefits and other long-term liabilities  27,570   26,671 
   
   
 
   362,946   335,835 
Shareholder’s Equity        
 Common stock, par value $1 a share  -0-   -0- 
 Additional paid-in capital  64,844   64,844 
 Retained earnings  11,314   (3,219)
 Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (1,676)  (3,264)
   
   
 
   74,482   58,361 
   
   
 
  $611,847  $509,544 
   
   
 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

19


 

Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Shareholder’s EquityOperations

                      
Accumulated
AdditionalOther
CommonPaid-InRetainedComprehensive
StockCapitalEarningsIncome (Loss)Total





(Dollars in thousands)
Balance at January 1, 2001, as previously stated $-0-  $64,844  $91,747  $(2,858) $153,733 
Adjustment for the cumulative effect on the prior years of applying retroactively the change in the method of accounting for inventories (see Note B)          2,741       2,741 
   
   
   
   
   
 
Balance January 1, 2001, as restated  -0-   64,844   94,488   (2,858)  156,474 
Comprehensive (loss):                    
 Net loss          (25,444)      (25,444)
 Foreign currency translation adjustment              (1,394)  (1,394)
                   
 
 Comprehensive (loss)                  (26,838)
   
   
   
   
   
 
Balance at December 31, 2001  -0-   64,844   69,044   (4,252)  129,636 
Comprehensive (loss):                    
 Net loss          (60,740)      (60,740)
 Foreign currency translation adjustment              1,711   1,711 
 Minimum pension liability              (5,555)  (5,555)
                   
 
 Comprehensive (loss)                  (64,584)
   
   
   
   
   
 
Balance at December 31, 2002 $-0-  $64,844  $8,304  $(8,096) $65,052 
   
   
   
   
   
 
Comprehensive (loss):                    
 Net Loss          (11,523)      (11,523)
 Foreign currency translation adjustment              3,632   3,632 
 Minimum pension liability              1,200   1,200 
                   
 
 Comprehensive (loss)                  (6,691)
   
   
   
   
   
 
Balance at December 31, 2003 $-0-  $64,844  $(3,219) $(3,264) $58,361 
   
   
   
   
   
 
               
Year Ended December 31,

200420032002



(Dollars in thousands)
Net sales $808,718  $624,295  $634,455 
Cost of products sold  682,658   527,586   546,857 
   
   
   
 
 Gross profit  126,060   96,709   87,598 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  76,714   62,369   57,418 
Restructuring and impairment charges  -0-   18,808   13,601 
   
   
   
 
 Operating income  49,346   15,532   16,579 
Interest expense  31,413   26,151   27,623 
   
   
   
 
  Income (loss) before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change  17,933   (10,619)  (11,044)
Income taxes  3,400   904   897 
   
   
   
 
  Income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change  14,533   (11,523)  (11,941)
Cumulative effect of accounting change  -0-   -0-   (48,799)
   
   
   
 
  Net income (loss) $14,533  $(11,523) $(60,740)
   
   
   
 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

20


 

Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsShareholder’s Equity

              
Year Ended December 31

200320022001



(Dollars in thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES            
Net income (loss) $(11,523) $(60,740) $(25,444)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operations:            
 Cumulative effect of accounting change  -0-   48,799   -0- 
 Depreciation and amortization  15,479   16,265   19,911 
 Restructuring and impairment charges  18,641   10,399   16,362 
 Deferred income taxes  -0-   1,951   (6,473)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities excluding acquisitions of  businesses:            
 Accounts receivable  539   4,652   16,257 
 Inventories  6,991   4,682   34,327 
 Accounts payable and accrued expenses  (12,160)  15,856   (23,911)
 Other  (6,149)  (12,770)  (8,731)
   
   
   
 
 Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities  11,818   29,094   22,298 
 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES            
Purchases of property, plant and equipment, net  (10,869)  (13,731)  (13,923)
Costs of acquisitions, net of cash acquired  -0-   (5,748)  -0- 
Proceeds from the sale of business units  7,340   2,486   6,051 
   
   
   
 
 Net Cash Used by Investing Activities  (3,529)  (16,993)  (7,872)
 
FINANCING ACTIVITIES            
Proceeds from financing arrangements  112,000   6,749   19,000 
Payments on long-term debt  (126,898)  (12,394)  (33,634)
   
   
   
 
 Net Cash Used by Financing Activities  (14,898)  (5,645)  (14,634)
 Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents  (6,609)  6,456   (208)
 Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year  8,800   2,344   2,552 
   
   
   
 
 Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year $2,191  $8,800  $2,344 
   
   
   
 
Taxes paid (refunded) $(1,038) $(4,817) $(3,346)
Interest paid  25,213   25,880   28,554 
                      
Accumulated
AdditionalOther
CommonPaid-InRetainedComprehensive
StockCapitalEarningsIncome (Loss)Total





(Dollars in thousands)
Balance at January 1, 2002 $-0-  $64,844  $69,044  $(4,252) $129,636 
Comprehensive (loss):                    
 Net loss          (60,740)      (60,740)
 Foreign currency translation adjustment              1,711   1,711 
 Minimum pension liability              (5,555)  (5,555)
                   
 
 Comprehensive (loss)                  (64,584)
   
   
   
   
   
 
Balance at December 31, 2002  -0-   64,844   8,304   (8,096)  65,052 
Comprehensive (loss):                    
 Net Loss          (11,523)      (11,523)
 Foreign currency translation adjustment              3,632   3,632 
 Minimum pension liability              1,200   1,200 
                   
 
 Comprehensive (loss)                  (6,691)
   
   
   
   
   
 
Balance at December 31, 2003  -0-   64,844   (3,219)  (3,264)  58,361 
Comprehensive income (loss):                    
 Net income          14,533       14,533 
 Foreign currency translation adjustment              2,071   2,071 
 Minimum pension liability              (483)  (483)
                   
 
 Comprehensive income                  16,121 
   
   
   
   
   
 
Balance at December 31, 2004 $-0-  $64,844  $11,314  $(1,676) $74,482 
   
   
   
   
   
 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

21


Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

               
Year Ended December 31,

200420032002



(Dollars in thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES            
Net income (loss) $14,533  $(11,523) $(60,740)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operations:            
  Cumulative effect of accounting change  -0-   -0-   48,799 
  Depreciation and amortization  15,385   15,479   16,265 
  Restructuring and impairment charges  -0-   18,641   10,399 
  Deferred income taxes  -0-   -0-   1,951 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities excluding acquisitions of businesses:            
  Accounts receivable  (35,606)  539   4,652 
  Inventories  (26,541)  6,991   4,682 
  Accounts payable and accrued expenses  39,400   (12,160)  15,856 
  Other  (6,257)  (6,149)  (12,770)
   
   
   
 
  Net cash provided by operating activities  914   11,818   29,094 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES            
Purchases of property, plant and equipment, net  (9,963)  (10,869)  (13,731)
Costs of acquisitions, net of cash acquired  (9,997)  -0-   (5,748)
Proceeds from the sale of business units  -0-   7,340   2,486 
   
   
   
 
 Net cash used by investing activities  (19,960)  (3,529)  (16,993)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES            
Proceeds from bank arrangements, net  18,013   112,000   6,749 
Payments on long-term debt  (199,930)  (126,898)  (12,394)
Issuance of 8.375% Senior Subordinated Notes, net of deferred financing costs  205,179   -0-   -0- 
   
   
   
 
  Net cash provided (used) by financing activities  23,262   (14,898)  (5,645)
  Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  4,216   (6,609)  6,456 
  Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year  2,191   8,800   2,344 
   
   
   
 
  Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $6,407  $2,191  $8,800 
   
   
   
 
Income taxes paid (refunded) $3,370  $(1,038) $(4,817)
Interest paid  28,891   25,213   25,880 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

22


 

PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2004, 2003 2002 and 20012002

(Dollars in thousands)

NOTE A — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

     Consolidation:The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all of its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.

     Accounting Estimates:The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

     Cash Equivalents:The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

     Inventories:Inventories are stated at the lower of first-in, first-out (FIFO) cost or market value (See Note B). Inventory reserves were $18,817$18,500 and $23,385$18,817 at December 31, 20032004 and 2002,2003, respectively.

     Major Classes of Inventories

                
December 31December 31,


2003200220042003




In-process and finished goods $121,154 $136,430  $151,759 $121,154 
Raw materials and supplies 27,921 19,637   25,535  27,921 
 
 
  
 
 
 $149,075 $156,067  $177,294 $149,075 
 
 
  
 
 

     Property, Plant and Equipment:Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost. Major additions and associated interest costs are capitalized and betterments are charged to accumulated depreciation; expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to operations. Depreciation of fixed assets is computed principally by the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the assets ranging from 25-60 years for buildings, and 3-183-16 years for machinery and equipment. The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in business conditions indicate that their full carrying value may not be recoverable (See Note P)N).

     Goodwill:As discussed in Note C, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 (“FAS 142”), “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” as of January 1, 2002. Under FAS 142, goodwill is no longer amortized but is subject to impairment testing at least annually on October 1. Prior to 2002, goodwill was amortized primarily over forty40 years using the straight-line method.

     Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits:The Company and its subsidiaries have pension plans, principally noncontributory defined benefit or noncontributory defined contribution plans, covering substantially all employees. In addition, the Company has two unfunded postretirement benefit plans. For the defined benefit plans, benefits are based on the employee’s years of service and the Company’s policy is to fund that amount recommended by its independent actuaries. For the defined contribution plans, the costs charged to operations and the amount funded are based upon a percentage of the covered employees’ compensation.

     Income Taxes:The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method, whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between the financial reporting and the tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the current enacted tax rates. In determining these amounts, management determined the probability of realizing deferred tax

2223


 

PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

rates. In determining these amounts, management determined the probability of realizing deferred tax assets, taking into consideration factors including historical operating results, expectations of future earnings and taxable income and the extended period of time over which the postretirement benefits will be paid and accordingly records valuation allowances when necessary (See Note H).

     Revenue Recognition:The Company recognizes revenue, other than from long-term contracts, when title is transferred to the customer, typically upon shipment. Revenue from long-term contracts (less than 5%7% of consolidated revenue) is accounted for under the percentage of completion method, and recognized on the basis of the percentage each contract’s cost to date bears to the total estimated contract cost. Revenue earned on contracts in process in excess of billings is classified in other current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The Company’s revenue recognition policies are in accordance with the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 101, “Revenue Recognition.”

     Accounts Receivable:Accounts receivable are recorded at selling price which is fixed based on a purchase order or contractual arrangement. Accounts receivable are reduced by an allowance for amounts that may become uncollectible in the future. The Company’s policy is to identify and reserve for specific collectibility concerns based on customers’ financial condition and payment history.

     Concentration of Credit Risk:The Company sells its products to customers in diversified industries. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition but does not require collateral to support customer receivables. The Company establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon factors surrounding the credit risk of specific customers, historical trends and other information. Write-offs of accounts receivable have historically been low. As of December 31, 2003,2004, the Company had uncollateralized receivables with sevensix customers in the automotive and heavy-duty truck industries, each with several locations, aggregating $28,365,$44,522, which represented approximately 27%31% of the Company’s trade accounts receivable. During 2003,2004, sales to these customers amounted to approximately $185,248,$240,787, which represented approximately 30% of the Company’s net sales.

     Shipping and Handling Costs:All shipping and handling costs are included in cost of products sold in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

     Environmental:The Company accrues environmental costs related to existing conditions resulting from past or current operations and from which no current or future benefit is discernible. Costs whichthat extend the life of the related property or mitigate or prevent future environmental contamination are capitalized. The Company records a liability when environmental assessments and/or remedial efforts are probable and can be reasonably estimated. The estimated liability of the Company is not discounted or reduced for possible recoveries from insurance carriers.

     Foreign Currency Translation:The functional currency for all subsidiaries outside the United States is the local currency. Financial statements for these subsidiaries are translated into United States dollars at year-end exchange rates as to assets and liabilities and weighted-average exchange rates as to revenues and expenses. The resulting translation adjustments are recorded in shareholders’ equity.

     Impact of Other Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements:In June 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” (“FAS 146”), which addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring).” FAS 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized and measured initially at the fair value only when the liability is incurred. Under EITF Issue 94-3, a liability for an exit cost was recognized at the date of an entity’s commitment to an exit plan. FAS 146 is effective for exit and disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. FAS 146 has no effect on charges recorded for exit activities

23


PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

begun prior to 2003. The adoption of this statement did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operation.

      In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45 (“FIN 45”), “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others”. FIN 45 elaborates on required disclosures by a guarantor in its financial statements about obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued and requires a guarantor to recognize, at the inception of certain guarantees, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The Company has adopted the provisions of FIN 45 relating to initial recognition and measurements of guarantor liabilities, which are effective for qualifying guarantees entered into or modified after December 15, 2002. The adoption did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” which clarifies the application of Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements,” relating to consolidation of certain entities. First, FIN 46 will require identification of the Company’s participation in variable interest entities (“VIEs”), which are defined as entities with a level of invested equity that is not sufficient to fund future activities to permit them to operate on a stand alone basis, or whose equity holders lack certain characteristics of a controlling financial interest. Then, for entities identified as VIEs, FIN 46 sets forth a model to evaluate potential consolidation based on an assessment of which party to the VIE, if any, bears a majority of the exposure to its expected losses, or stands to gain from a majority of its expected returns. FIN 46 also sets forth certain disclosures regarding

24


PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

interests in VIEs that are deemed significant, even if consolidation is not required. The Company’s adoption of FIN 46 had no effect on its financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

      In April 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“FAS 149”). FAS 149 amends and clarifies the accounting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities under FAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” FAS 149 is generally effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003 and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. The Company’s adoption of FAS 149 had no effect on its financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

      In May 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity (“FAS 150”). FAS 150 requires that certain financial instruments, which under previous guidance were accounted for as equity, must now be accounted for as liabilities. The financial instruments affected include mandatorily redeemable stock, certain financial instruments that require or may require the issuer to buy back some of its shares in exchange for cash or other assets and certain obligations that can be settled with shares of stock. FAS 150 is effective for all financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and must be applied to the Company’s existing financial instruments effective July 1, 2003, the beginning of the first fiscal period after June 15, 2003. The Company adopted FAS 150 on June 1, 2003. The adoption of this statement had no effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

      In January 2004,December 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the “Medicare Act”) was enacted in the United States. The Medicare Act, among other things, expanded existing Medicare healthcare benefits to include an outpatient prescription drug benefit to Medicare eligible residents of the U.S. (“Part D”) beginning in 2006. Prescription drug coverage will be available to eligible individuals who voluntarily enroll under a Part D plan. As an alternative, employers may provide drug coverage at least “actuarially equivalent to standard coverage” and receive a tax-free federal subsidy equal to 28% of a portion of a Medicare beneficiary’s drug costs. However, if covered retirees enroll in a Part D plan, the employer would not receive the subsidy.

      The FASB has issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) 106-1,FAS No. 106-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003” (“the Act”).2003,” to provide guidance on accounting for effects of this healthcare benefit legislation. The FSP permits a sponsortreats the effect of athe employer subsidy on the accumulated postretirement health care plan that provides a prescription drug benefit obligation (“APBO”) as an actuarial gain. The effect of the subsidy would also be reflected in the estimate of service cost in measuring the cost of benefits attributable to make a one-time election to defer accounting for thecurrent service. The effects of plan amendments adopted subsequent to the Act. Regardless of whether a sponsor elects that deferral, the FSP requires certain disclosures pending further considerationadoption of the underlying accounting issues.Medicare Act to qualify plans as actuarially equivalent would be treated as actuarial gains if the net effect of the amendments reduces the APBO. The net effect on the APBO of any plan amendments that (a) reduce benefits under the plan and thus disqualify the benefits as actuarially equivalent and (b) eliminate the subsidy would be accounted for as prior service cost.

      The Company has electedcompleted its assessment of the provisions of the Medicare Act on its postretirement healthcare plans. The effect of the Medicare Act is a reduction to defer accounting for the effectsAPBO of $2,350. The effect of the Medicare Act reduced the net periodic postretirement benefit cost by $310 in 2004.

24      In the fourth quarter of 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 151, “Inventory Costs” (“FAS 151”), an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43, Chapter 4. The amendments made by FAS No. 151 clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted materials (spoilage) are to be recognized as current-period charges and will require the allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory based on the normal capacity

25


 

PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

of the Act.production facilities. The guidance is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after November 23, 2004. The Company expects the adoption of FAS 151 to have little impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

      The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the “Jobs Act”) was signed into law in October 2004. The Jobs Act provides, among other things, for a tax deduction on qualified domestic production activities and introduced a special one-time dividends received deduction on the repatriation of certain foreign earnings to a U.S. taxpayer, provided certain criteria are met. The FASB issued FASB Staff Position 109-1 to provide guidance on the application of FAS 109, and FASB Staff Position 109-2 to provide accounting and disclosure guidance for the repatriation provision. The Company is currently evaluatingreviewing the impactimplication of the Jobs Act, recently released treasury guidance, and the FASB staff positions and does not expect the Jobs Act will have a material impact on itsthe Company’s financial position, and results of operations.operations or cash flows.

     Reclassification:Certain amounts in the prior years’ financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

NOTE B — Accounting Change

      Effective June 30, 2003, the Company changed the method of accounting for the 15% of its inventories utilizing the LIFO method to the FIFO method. The Company believes that this change is preferable for the following reasons: 1) the change conforms all of its inventories to one method of determining cost, which is the FIFO method; 2) the costs of the Company’s inventories have remained fairly level during the past several years, which has substantially negated the benefits of the LIFO method (a better matching of current costs with current revenue in periods of rising costs); 3) the impact of utilizing the LIFO method has had an insignificant impact on the Company’s consolidated net income (loss) during the past several years; and 4) the FIFO method results in the valuation of inventories at current costs on the consolidated balance sheet, which provides a more meaningful presentation for investors and financial institutions.

      As required under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, the Company has restated the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2002 to increase inventories by the recorded LIFO reserve ($4.4 million),$4,400, increase deferred tax liabilities ($1.7 million)1,700), and increase shareholders’ equity ($2.7 million).$2,700. Previously reported results of operations have not been restated because the impact of utilizing the LIFO method had an insignificant impact on the Company’s reported amounts for consolidated net income (loss).

NOTE C — Adoption of FAS 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”

      Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted FAS 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” Under this standard, goodwill is no longer amortized, but is subject to an impairment test at least annually. The Company has selected October 1 as its annual testing date. In the year of adoption, FAS 142 also requires the Company to perform a transitional test to determine whether goodwill was impaired as of the beginning of the year. Under FAS 142, the initial step in testing for goodwill impairment is to compare the fair value of each reporting unit to its book value. To the extent the fair value of any reporting unit is less than its book value, which would indicate that potential impairment of goodwill exists, a second test is required to determine the amount of impairment.

      The Company, with assistance of an outside consultant, completed the transitional impairment review of goodwill using a discounted cash flow approach to determine the fair value of each reporting unit. Based upon the results of these calculations, the Company recorded a non-cash charge for

26


PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

goodwill impairment which aggregated $48,799. In accordance with the provisions of FAS 142, the charge has been accounted for as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, effective January 1, 2002. The Company also completed the annual impairment tests as of October 1, 2004, 2003 and 2002, and has determined that no additional impairment of goodwill existed as of those dates.

25


PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

      The following table summarizes the transitional goodwill impairment charge by reporting segment as well as the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 20022003 and December 31, 2003.2004.

                        
Impairment ChargeImpairment Charge
Reportingrecorded effectiveGoodwill atGoodwill atrecorded effectiveGoodwill atGoodwill at
SegmentJanuary 1, 2002December 31, 2002December 31, 2003January 1, 2002December 31, 2003December 31, 2004







ILS $32,239 $64,949 $65,763  $32,239 $65,763 $66,050 
Aluminum Products 9,700 16,515 16,515   9,700  16,515  16,515 
Manufactured Products 6,860 -0- -0-   6,860  -0-  -0- 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 $48,799 $81,464 $82,278  $48,799 $82,278 $82,565 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 

      The increase in the goodwill in the ILS segment during 2003 and 2004 results from foreign currency fluctuations.

      In accordance with FAS 142, prior period amounts have not been restated. The following table summarizes the reported results for 2001, and the results that would have been reported had the non-amortization provisions of FAS 142 been in effect for that year.

     
December 31
2001

Reported net loss $(25,444)
Amortization of goodwill adjustment, net of tax  3,315 
   
 
Adjusted net loss $(22,129)
   
 

NOTE D — Acquisitions and Dispositions

      During the first quarter of 2003, the Company completed the sale of substantially all of the assets of Green Bearing (“Green”) and St. Louis Screw and Bolt (“St. Louis Screw”) for cash of approximately $7,300. No gain or loss was recorded on the sale. Green and St. Louis Screw were non-core businesses in the ILS Segment and Manufactured Products Segment, respectively, and had been identified as businesses the Company was selling as part of its restructuring activities during 2002 and 2001.

      On September 10, 2002,August 23, 2004, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of Ajax Magnethermic Corporationthe Automotive Components Group (“Ajax”Amcast Components Group”), a manufacturer of induction heating and melting equipment.Amcast Industrial Corporation. The purchase price was approximately $10,000 in cash and the assumption of approximately $5,500$9,000 of operating liabilities. The acquisition was funded with borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility. The purchase price and the results of operations of AjaxAmcast Components Group prior to its date of acquisition were not deemed significant as defined in Regulation S-X. The results of operations for Amcast Components Group have been included since August 23, 2004.

      On April 26, 2002, the Company completed the sale of substantially allThe tentative allocation of the assets of Castle Rubber Company for cash of approximately $2,500. Castle Rubber, a non-core business in the Manufactured Products Segment, hadpurchase price has been identified as a business the Company was discontinuing as part of its restructuring activities during 2001. No gain or loss was recordedperformed based on the sale.assignment of fair values to assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Final fair values will be based primarily on appraisals from an independent appraisal firm.

      On December 21, 2001, the Company completed the sale of substantially allThe tentative allocation of the assets of Cleveland City Forge for cash of approximately $6,100 and recorded a gain of approximately $100. Cleveland City Forge was a non-core business in the Manufactured Products Segment, producing clevises and turnbuckles for the construction industry.

26


PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

NOTE E — Other Assets

      Other assets consists of the following:

          
December 31

20032002


Pension assets $36,186  $32,816 
Idle assets  6,516   -0- 
Deferred financing costs  5,774   4,636 
Tooling  4,222   4,213 
Software development costs  3,947   4,118 
Other  4,665   5,800 
   
   
 
 Totals $61,310  $51,583 
   
   
 

NOTE F — Accrued Expenses

      Accrued expenses include the following:

          
December 31

20032002


Accrued salaries, wages and benefits $9,484  $10,583 
Advance billings  8,496   6,594 
Warranty and installation accruals  6,762   8,990 
Severance and exit costs  2,535   4,045 
Interest payable  2,055   3,529 
State and local taxes  3,809   3,206 
Sundry  13,243   11,892 
   
   
 
 Totals $46,384  $48,839 
   
   
 

      Substantially all advance billings and warranty and installation accruals relate to the Company’s capital equipment businesses.

      The changes in the aggregate product warranty liability arepurchase price is as follows for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002:follows:

         
December 31

20032002


Balance at beginning of year $6,506  $997 
Claims paid during the year  (2,399)  (1,430)
Additional warranties issued during year  1,139   1,858 
Acquired warranty liabilities  -0-   5,081 
Other  368   -0- 
   
   
 
Balance at end of year $5,614  $6,506 
   
   
 
      
Cash acquisition price $10,000 
Assets    
 Accounts receivable  (8,931)
 Inventories  (1,677)
 Property and equipment  (16,964)
 Other  (115)
Liabilities    
 Accounts payable  4,041 
 Compensation accruals  5,504 
 Other accruals  8,142 
   
 
Goodwill $-0- 
   
 

      The acquired warranty liability during 2002 reflects the warranty liabilityCompany has a plan for integration activities and plant rationalization. In accordance with FASB EITF Issue No. 95-3, “Recognition of Ajax, which was acquiredLiabilities in September, 2002.Connection with a Purchase Business Combina-

27


 

PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

tion”, the Company recorded accruals for severance, exit and relocation costs in the purchase price allocation. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending accrual balances is as follows:

                 
SeveranceExitRelocationTotal




Balance at June 30, 2004 $-0-  $-0-  $-0-  $-0- 
Add: Accruals  1,916   100   265   2,281 
Less: Payments  295   -0-   2   297 
   
   
   
   
 
Balance at December 31, 2004 $1,621  $100  $263  $1,984 
   
   
   
   
 

      On April 1, 2004, the Company acquired the remaining 66% of the common stock of Japan Ajax Magnethermic Company (“Jamco”) for cash existing on the balance sheet of Jamco at that date. No additional purchase price was paid by the Company. The purchase price and the results of operations of Jamco prior to its date of acquisition were not deemed significant as defined in Regulation S-X.

NOTE E — Other Assets

      Other assets consists of the following:

          
December 31,

20042003


Pension assets $41,295  $36,186 
Idle assets  6,040   6,516 
Deferred financing costs  7,846   5,774 
Tooling  3,570   4,222 
Software development costs  3,390   3,947 
Other  6,394   4,665 
   
   
 
 Totals $68,535  $61,310 
   
   
 

NOTE F — Accrued Expenses

      Accrued expenses include the following:

          
December 31,

20042003


Accrued salaries, wages and benefits $14,098  $9,484 
Advance billings  10,059   8,496 
Warranty, project and installation accruals  5,660   6,762 
Severance and exit costs  2,175   2,535 
Interest payable  2,022   2,055 
State and local taxes  4,553   3,809 
Sundry  21,178   13,243 
   
   
 
 Totals $59,745  $46,384 
   
   
 

      Substantially all advance billings and warranty, project and installation accruals relate to the Company’s capital equipment businesses.

28


PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

      The changes in the aggregate product warranty liability are as follows for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003:

��        
December 31,

20042003


Balance at beginning of year $5,614  $6,506 
Claims paid during the year  (4,708)  (2,399)
Additional warranties issued during year  2,874   1,139 
Acquired warranty liabilities  501   -0- 
Other  -0-   368 
   
   
 
Balance at end of year $4,281  $5,614 
   
   
 

      The acquired warranty liability during 2004 reflects the warranty liability of Jamco, which was acquired in April 2004.

NOTE G — Financing Arrangements

      Long-term debt consists of the following:

                  
December 31December 31,


2003200220042003




9.25% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2007. $199,930 $199,930 
Revolving credit maturing on June 30, 2004. -0- 114,000 
Revolving credit maturing on July 30, 2007. 101,000 -0- 
8.375% Senior Subordinated Notes due 20148.375% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014 $210,000 $-0- 
9.25% Senior Subordinated Notes due 20079.25% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2007  -0-  199,930 
Revolving credit maturing on December 31, 2010Revolving credit maturing on December 31, 2010  120,600  101,000 
Industrial Development Revenue Bonds maturing in 2012 at interest rates from 2.00% to 4.15%Industrial Development Revenue Bonds maturing in 2012 at interest rates from 2.00% to 4.15% 4,478 4,863 Industrial Development Revenue Bonds maturing in 2012 at interest rates from 2.00% to 4.15%  4,041  4,478 
OtherOther 4,817 6,329 Other  3,666  4,817 
 
 
   
 
 
 310,225 325,122    338,307  310,225 
Less current maturitiesLess current maturities 1,061 1,306 Less current maturities  2,931  1,061 
 
 
   
 
 
Total $309,164 $323,816 Total $335,376 $309,164 
 
 
   
 
 

      Maturities of long-term debt during each of the five years following December 31, 20032004 are approximately $1,061 in 2004, $1,011$2,931 in 2005, $1,016$821 in 2006, $301,969$836 in 2007, $674 in 2008 and $804$689 in 2008.2009.

      In November 2004, the Company issued $210,000 of 8.375% Senior Subordinated Notes due November 15, 2014 (“8.375% Notes”). The net proceeds from this debt issuance were approximately $205,178 net of underwriting and other debt offering fees. Proceeds from the 8.375% Notes were used to fund the tender and early redemption of the Company’s 9.25% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2007. The Company incurred debt extinguishment costs related primarily to premiums and other transaction costs associated with the tender and early redemption and wrote off deferred financing costs associated with the 9.25% Senior Subordinated Notes totaling $5,963 or $.53 per share on a diluted basis.

      The Company is a party to a credit and security agreement dated November  5, 2003, as amended (“Credit Agreement”), with a group of banks, under which it may borrow or issue standby letters of credit or commercial letters of credit up to $165,000.$200,000. During 2004, the Credit Agreement was amended to extend the maturity to December 31, 2010 and increase the credit line from $165,000 at December 31, 2003 to $200,000 at December 31, 2004. The amended credit agreement provides lower interest rate brackets and modified certain covenants to provide greater flexibility. The Credit Agreement currently contains a detailed borrowing base formula whichthat provides borrowing capacity to the Company based on

29


PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

negotiated percentages of eligible accounts receivable, inventory and fixed assets. At December 31, 2003,2004, the Company had approximately $47,500$53,941 of unused borrowing capacity available under the Credit Agreement. Interest is payable quarterly at either the bank’s prime lending rate (4.00%(5.25% at December 31, 2003)2004) or, at Park-Ohio’sthe Company’s election, at LIBOR plus 1.75%-2.50%.75%-2.25%. The Company’s ability to elect LIBOR-based interest as well as the overall interest rate are dependent on the Company’s Debt Service Coverage Ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement. Up to $20,000 in standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit may be issued under the Credit Agreement. As of December 31, 2003,2004, in addition to amounts borrowed under the Credit Agreement, there is $7,900was $9,133 outstanding primarily for standby letters of credit. A fee of .25% is imposed by the bank on the unused portion of available borrowings. The Credit Agreement expires on July 30, 2007December 31, 2010 and borrowings are secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets.

      A foreign subsidiary of the Company had outstanding standby letters of credit of $1,485 at December 31, 2004 under its credit arrangement.

      The 8.375% Notes are general unsecured senior obligations of the Company and are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several basis, by all domestic subsidiaries of the Company. Provisions of the indenture governing the Senior Subordinated8.375% Notes and the revolving credit agreementCredit Agreement contain restrictions on the Company’s ability to incur additional indebtedness, to create liens or other encumbrances, to make certain payments, investments, loans and guarantees and to sell or otherwise dispose of a substantial portion of assets or to merge or consolidate with an unaffiliated entity. At December 31, 2003,2004, the Company was in compliance with all financial covenants of the Credit Agreement.

      The weighted average interest rate on all debt was 7.26%6.84% at December 31, 2003.2004.

      The fair market value of the Senior Subordinated Notes based on published market prices was approximately $201,429 and $129,955 at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.      The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and borrowings under the credit agreement and the senior subordinated notes approximate fair value at December 31, 20032004 and 2002.2003.

28NOTE H — Income Taxes

      Income taxes consisted of the following:

              
Year Ended December 31,

200420032002



Current payable (refundable):            
 Federal $(426) $-0-  $(2,210)
 State  23   16   387 
 Foreign  3,245   888   769 
   
   
   
 
   2,842   904   (1,054)
Deferred:            
 Federal  -0-   -0-   1,951 
 State  -0-   -0-   -0- 
 Foreign  558   -0-   -0- 
   
   
   
 
   558   -0-   1,951 
   
   
   
 
Income taxes $3,400  $904  $897 
   
   
   
 

30


 

PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

NOTE H — Income Taxes

      Income taxes consisted of the following:

              
Year Ended December 31

200320022001



Current (refundable):            
 Federal $-0-  $(2,210) $(5,828)
 State  16   387   369 
 Foreign  888   769   532 
   
   
   
 
   904   (1,054)  (4,927)
Deferred:            
 Federal  -0-   1,951   (6,135)
 State  -0-   -0-   (338)
   
   
   
 
   -0-   1,951   (6,473)
   
   
   
 
Income taxes $904  $897  $(11,400)
   
   
   
 

      The reasons for the difference between income tax expense and the amount computed by applying the statutory Federal income tax rate to income before income taxes are as follows:

                 
Year Ended December 31Year Ended December 31,


200320022001200420032002






Computed statutory amount $(3,712) $(3,895) $(12,700) $5,984 $(3,712) $(3,895)
Effect of state income taxes 11 411 20   16  11  411 
Goodwill -0- -0- 668 
Foreign rate differences 815 599 275   661  815  599 
Valuation allowance 3,695 3,475 -0-   (3,042)  3,695  3,475 
Other, net 95 307 337   (219)  95  307 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
Income taxes (benefit) $904 $897 $(11,400) $3,400 $904 $897 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 

29


PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

      Significant components of the Company’s net deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

                    
December 31December 31,


2003200220042003




Deferred tax assets:Deferred tax assets: Deferred tax assets:       
Postretirement benefit obligation $7,600 $8,100 Postretirement benefit obligation $7,933 $7,600 
Inventory 8,400 7,200 Inventory  11,277  8,400 
Net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards 14,300 10,900 Net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards  20,384  14,300 
Goodwill 6,800 6,800 Other—net  11,867  15,200 
Other—net 8,400 2,600   
 
 
 
 
  Total deferred tax assets  51,461  45,500 
Deferred tax liabilities:Deferred tax liabilities:       
 Total deferred tax assets 45,500 35,600 Tax over book depreciation  15,492  13,900 
Deferred tax liabilities: 
Tax over book depreciation 13,900 12,800 Pension  16,725  11,400 
Pension 11,400 10,500 Deductible goodwill  1,087  -0- 
 
 
   
 
 
 Total deferred tax liabilities 25,300 23,300  Total deferred tax liabilities  33,304  25,300 
 
 
   
 
 
 20,200 12,300    18,157  20,200 
Valuation reservesValuation reserves (20,200) (12,300)Valuation reserves  (19,231)  (20,200)
 
 
   
 
 
Net deferred tax assets $-0- $-0- 
Net deferred tax liabilityNet deferred tax liability $(1,074) $-0- 
 
 
   
 
 

      At December 31, 2003,2004, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards for income tax purposes of approximately $35,700,$47,700, which will expire between 2021 and 2023.2024. In accordance with the provisions of FAS 109 “Accounting for Income Taxes”, the tax benefits related to these carryforwards have been fully reserved as of December 31, 2003 since2004 because the Company is in a three year cumulative loss position.

      At December 31, 2004 the Company has research and developmental credit carryforwards of approximately $1,691 which will expire between 2010 and 2023. The Company also has an alternative minimum tax credit carryforward in the amount of approximately $1,020 which has an indefinite carryforward life.

NOTE I — Legal Proceedings

      The Company is subject to various pending and threatened lawsuits in which claims for monetary damages are asserted in the ordinary course of business. While any litigation involves an element of uncertainty, in the opinion of management, liabilities, if any, arising from currently pending or threatened litigation will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.

3031


 

PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

threatened litigation will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.

NOTE J — Pensions and Postretirement Benefits

      The following tables set forth the change in benefit obligation, plan assets, funded status and amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet for the defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans as of December 31, 20032004 and 2002:2003:

                        
PostretirementPostretirement
PensionBenefitsPensionBenefits




20032002200320022004200320042003








Change in benefit obligation
              
Benefit obligation at beginning of year $52,481 $50,564 $24,869 $23,403  $53,075 $52,481 $27,366 $24,869 
Service cost 545 399 147 204   291  545  136  147 
Curtailment and settlement (208) 2,053 -0- -0-   -0-  (208)  -0-  -0- 
Interest cost 3,498 3,556 1,701 1,712   3,320  3,498  1,532  1,701 
Plan participants’ contributions -0- -0- 247 135 
Amendments  566  -0-  -0-  -0- 
Actuarial losses (gains) 1,800 1,132 3,758 1,570   2,799  1,800  (637)  3,758 
Benefits and expenses paid (5,041) (5,223) (3,356) (2,155)
Benefits and expenses paid, net of contributions  (4,748)  (5,041)  (3,717)  (3,109)
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
Benefit obligation at end of year $53,075 $52,481 $27,366 $24,869  $55,303 $53,075 $24,680 $27,366 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
Change in plan assets
              
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year $85,401 $100,498 $-0- $-0-  $97,603 $85,401 $-0- $-0- 
Actual return on plan assets 17,243 (8,811) -0- -0-   11,093  17,243  -0-  -0- 
Settlement accounting -0- (1,063) -0- -0- 
Company contributions -0- -0- 3,109 2,020   -0-  -0-  3,717  3,109 
Plan participants’ contributions -0- -0- 247 135 
Benefits and expense paid (5,041) (5,223) (3,356) (2,155)
Benefits and expenses paid, net of contributions  (4,748)  (5,041)  (3,717)  (3,109)
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
Fair value of plan assets at end of year $97,603 $85,401 $-0- $-0-  $103,948 $97,603 $-0- $-0- 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
Funded (underfunded) status of the plan $44,528 $32,920 $(27,366) $(24,869) $48,645 $44,528 $(24,680) $(27,366)
Unrecognized net transition obligation (487) (536) -0- -0-   (439)  (487)  -0-  -0- 
Unrecognized net actuarial (gain) loss (7,235) 1,547 5,375 (303)  (6,929)  (7,235)  4,639  5,375 
Unrecognized prior service cost (benefit) 773 1,198 (327) (407)  1,210  773  (247)  (327)
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
Net amount recognized at year end $37,579 $35,129 $(22,318) $(25,579) $42,487 $37,579 $(20,288) $(22,318)
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 

Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets consists of:

                  
2003200220042003




Prepaid pension costPrepaid pension cost $36,186 $32,816 Prepaid pension cost $41,295 $36,186 
Accrued pension costAccrued pension cost (2,962) (3,526)Accrued pension cost  (4,211)  (2,962)
Intangible assetIntangible asset -0- 284 Intangible asset  565  -0- 
Accumulated other comprehensive lossAccumulated other comprehensive loss 4,355 5,555 Accumulated other comprehensive loss  4,838  4,355 
 
 
   
 
 
Net amount recognized at the end of year $37,579 $35,129 Net amount recognized at the end of year $42,487 $37,579 
 
 
   
 
 

3132


 

PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

      The pension plan weighted-average asset allocation at year ended 20032004 and 20022003 and target allocation for 2004 are as follows:

                      
Plan AssetsPlan Assets


Target 200420032002Target 200520042003






Asset Category
           
Equity securities 60-70% 64.8% 62.7%  60-70%  66.7%  64.8%
Debt securities 25-30 26.0 28.7   20-30  20.5  26.0 
Other 5-10 9.2 8.6   7-15  12.8  9.2 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 100% 100% 100%  100%  100%  100%
 
 
 
  
 
 
 

      The Company recorded a minimum pension liability of $4,838 at December 31, 2004 and $4,355 at December 31, 2003, and $5,555 at December 31, 2002, as required by Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 87. The adjustment is reflected in other comprehensive income and long-term liabilities. The adjustment relates to two of the Company’s defined benefit plans, for which the accumulated benefit obligations of $16,336$17,458 at December 31, 20032004 ($15,57316,336 at December 31, 2002)2003), exceed the fair value of the underlying pension assets of $13,374$13,247 at December 31, 20032004 ($12,04713,374 at December 31, 2002)2003). Amounts were as follows:

                
2003200220042003




Projected benefit obligation $16,336 $15,573  $17,458 $16,336 
 
 
  
 
 
Accumulated benefit obligation $16,336 $15,573  $17,458 $16,336 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair value of plan assets $13,374 $12,047  $13,247 $13,374 
 
 
  
 
 

      The following tables summarize the assumptions used by the consulting actuary and the related cost information.

                              
PostretirementPostretirement
PensionBenefitsPensionBenefits




2003200220032002200420032002200420032002










Weighted-Average assumptions as of December 31
                    
Discount rate 6.50% 7.00% 6.50% 7.00%  6.00%  6.50%  7.00%  6.00%  6.50%  7.00%
Expected return on plan assets 8.75% 8.75% N/A N/A   8.75%  8.75%  8.75%  N/A  N/A  N/A 
Rate of compensation increase 2.00% 2.00% N/A N/A   N/A  2.00%  2.00%  N/A  N/A  N/A 

      In determining its expected return on plan assets assumption for the year ended December 31, 2003,2004, the Company considered historical experience, its asset allocation, expected future long-term rates of return for each major asset class, and an assumed long-term inflation rate. Based on these factors, the Company derived an expected return on plan assets for the year ended December 31, 20032004 of 8.75%. This assumption was supported by the asset return generation model used by the Company’s independent actuaries, which projected future asset returns using simulation and asset class correlation.

      The Company has elected to defer recognition of the potential effect of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 until authoritative guidance on the accounting for the federal subsidy is issued.33


PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

      For measurement purposes, a 10% percent annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered health care benefits was assumed for 2003.2004. The rate was assumed to decrease gradually to 5% for 2009 and remain at that level thereafter.

                         
Pension BenefitsOther Benefits


200420032002200420032002






Components of net periodic benefit cost
                        
Service costs $291  $545  $399  $136  $147  $204 
Interest costs  3,320   3,498   3,556   1,532   1,701   1,712 
Expected return on plan assets  (8,313)  (7,229)  (8,394)  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Transition obligation  (49)  (49)  (49)  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Amortization of prior service cost  129   257   319   (80)  (80)  (79)
Recognized net actuarial (gain) loss  (286)  361   (1,055)  99   43   11 
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Benefit (income) costs $(4,908) $(2,617) $(5,224) $1,687  $1,811  $1,848 
   
   
   
   
   
   
 

32


PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued      Below is a table summarizing the Company’s expected future benefit payments and the expected payments due to the Medicare subsidy over the next ten years:

                         
Pension BenefitsOther Benefits


200320022001200320022001






Components of net periodic benefit cost
                        
Service costs $545  $399  $590  $147  $204  $179 
Interest costs  3,498   3,556   3,506   1,701   1,712   1,663 
Expected return on plan assets  (7,229)  (8,394)  (8,658)  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Transition obligation  (49)  (49)  (56)  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Amortization of prior service cost  257   319   363   (80)  (79)  (79)
Recognized net actuarial (gain) loss  361   (1,055)  (1,720)  43   11   (28)
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Benefit (income) costs $(2,617) $(5,224) $(5,975) $1,811  $1,848  $1,735 
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
             
PensionOtherPayments due to
BenefitsBenefitsMedicare Subsidy



2005 $4,512  $2,881  $-0- 
2006  4,386   2,568   288 
2007  4,303   2,482   290 
2008  4,254   2,413   285 
2009  4,285   2,319   278 
2010 to 2014  20,567   9,875   1,199 

      The Company recorded $167 of non-cash pension curtailment charges in 2003 and $2,700 in 2002 and $200 in 2001 related to the disposal or closure of three manufacturing facilities. These were classified as restructuring charges in each year.

      The Company has two postretirement benefit plans. Under both of these plans, health care benefits are provided on both a contributory and noncontributory basis. The assumed health care cost trend rate has a significant effect on the amounts reported. A one-percentage-point change in the assumed health care cost trend rate would have the following effects:

         
1-Percentage1-Percentage
PointPoint
IncreaseDecrease


Effect on total of service and interest cost components in 2003 $138  $104 
Effect on post retirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 2003 $1,767  $1,545 
         
1-Percentage1-Percentage
PointPoint
IncreaseDecrease


Effect on total of service and interest cost components in 2004 $129  $110 
Effect on post retirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 2004 $1,797  $1,558 

      The total contribution charged to pension expense for the Company’s defined contribution plans was $1,446 in 2004, $1,331 in 2003 and $1,273 in 2002 and $1,382 in 2001.2002. The Company expects to have no contributioncontributions to its defined benefit plans in 2004.2005.

34


PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

NOTE K — Leases

      Rental expense for 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $10,588, $10,263 and 2001 was $10,263, $10,749, and $12,638, respectively. Future minimum lease commitments during each of the five years following December 31, 20032004 are as follows: $7,178 in 2004, $5,259$9,820 in 2005, $3,273$7,632 in 2006, $1,600$5,030 in 2007, $1,329$3,993 in 2008, $3,094 in 2009 and $1,856$3,858 thereafter.

NOTE L — Industry Segments

      The Company operates through three segments: Integrated Logistics Solutions (“ILS”), Aluminum Products and Manufactured Products. ILS is a leading supply chain logistics provider of production components to large, multinational manufacturing companies, other manufacturers and distributors. In connection with the supply of such production components, ILS provides a variety of value-added, cost-effective supply chain management services. The principal customers of ILS are in the semiconductor equipment, heavy-duty truck, industrial equipment, aerospace and defense, electrical controls, HVAC, vehicle parts and accessories, appliances, and lawn and garden equipment industries. Aluminum Products manufactures cast aluminum components for automotive, agricultural equipment, heavy-duty truck and construction equipment. Aluminum Products also provides value-added services such as design and engineering, machining and assembly. Manufactured Products operates a diverse group of niche manu-

33


PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

facturingmanufacturing businesses that design and manufacture a broad range of high quality products engineered for specific customer applications. The principal customers of Manufactured Products are original equipment manufacturers and end-users in the aerospace, automotive, railroad, truck and oil industries.

      The Company’s sales are made through its own sales organization, distributors and representatives. Intersegment sales are immaterial and eliminated in consolidation and are not included in the figures presented. Intersegment sales are accounted for at values based on market prices. Income allocated to segments excludes certain corporate expenses and interest expense. Identifiable assets by industry segment include assets directly identified with those operations.

      Corporate assets generally consist of cash and cash equivalents, deferred tax assets, property and equipment, and other assets.

                      
Year Ended December 31Year Ended December 31,


200320022001200420032002






Net sales:Net sales: Net sales:          
ILS $377,645 $398,141 $416,962 
Aluminum products 90,080 106,148 84,846 
Manufactured products 156,570 130,166 134,609 
 
 
 
 
 $624,295 $634,455 $636,417 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) before income taxes and amortization of goodwill: 
ILS $24,893 $17,467 $22,944 
Aluminum products 10,201 4,739 (2,327)
Manufactured products (13,759) (1,342) (14,287)
 
 
 
 
 $21,335 $20,864 $6,330 
 
 
 
 
Amortization of goodwill: 
ILS $-0- $-0- $2,702 ILS $453,223 $377,645 $398,141 
Aluminum products -0- -0- 745 Aluminum products  135,402  90,080  106,148 
Manufactured products -0- -0- 286 Manufactured products  220,093  156,570  130,166 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 $-0- $-0- $3,733   $808,718 $624,295 $634,455 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Income (loss) before income taxes and change in accounting principle:Income (loss) before income taxes and change in accounting principle: Income (loss) before income taxes and change in accounting principle:          
ILS $24,893 $17,467 $20,242 ILS $29,191 $24,893 $17,467 
Aluminum products 10,201 4,739 (3,072)Aluminum products  9,021  10,201  4,739 
Manufactured products (13,759) (1,342) (14,573)Manufactured products  18,890  (13,759)  (1,342)
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 21,335 20,864 2,597    57,102  21,335  20,864 
Corporate costs (5,803) (4,285) (6,483)Corporate costs  (7,756)  (5,803)  (4,285)
Interest expense (26,151) (27,623) (31,108)Interest expense  (31,413)  (26,151)  (27,623)
Non-operating items, net -0- -0- (1,850)  
 
 
 
 
 
 
   $17,933 $(10,619) $(11,044)
 $(10,619) $(11,044) $(36,844)  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

3435


 

PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

                      
Year Ended December 31Year Ended December 31,


200320022001200420032002






Identifiable assets:Identifiable assets: Identifiable assets:          
ILS $267,361 $273,442 $312,288 ILS $297,002 $267,361 $273,442 
Aluminum products 88,031 79,797 95,033 Aluminum products  105,535  88,031  79,797 
Manufactured products 121,331 151,880 141,774 Manufactured products  163,230  121,331  151,880 
General corporate 32,821 37,824 45,813 General corporate  46,080  32,821  37,824 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 $509,544 $542,943 $594,908   $611,847 $509,544 $542,943 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization expense:Depreciation and amortization expense: Depreciation and amortization expense:          
ILS $4,868 $5,206 $8,441 ILS $4,608 $4,868 $5,206 
Aluminum products 5,342 6,432 5,532 Aluminum products  5,858  5,342  6,432 
Manufactured products 5,050 4,307 5,632 Manufactured products  4,728  5,050  4,307 
General corporate 219 320 306 General corporate  191  219  320 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 $15,479 $16,265 $19,911   $15,385 $15,479 $16,265 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Capital expenditures:Capital expenditures: Capital expenditures:          
ILS $3,017 $1,603 $1,972 ILS $3,691 $3,017 $1,603 
Aluminum products 1,878 5,927 3,160 Aluminum products  5,497  1,878  5,927 
Manufactured products 5,867 6,201 8,352 Manufactured products  720  5,867  6,201 
General corporate 107 -0- 439 General corporate  55  107  -0- 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 $10,869 $13,731 $13,923   $9,963 $10,869 $13,731 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 

      The Company had sales of $95,610 in 2004 and $68,238 in 2003 to NavistarInternational Truck, which represented approximately 12% and 11% of consolidated net sales.sales for each respective year. For 2002, and 2001, sales to no single customer were greater than 10% of consolidated net sales.

      The Company’s approximate percentage of net sales by geographic region were as follows:

                  
Year EndedYear Ended
December 31December 31,


200320022001200420032002






United States 83% 80% 88%  74%  83%  80%
Canada 8% 13% 7%  9%  8%  13%
Other 9% 7% 5%  17%  9%  7%
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 100% 100% 100%  100%  100%  100%
 
 
 
  
 
 
 

      At December 31, 2003,2004, approximately 88%86% of the Company’s assets are maintained in the United States.

3536


 

PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

NOTE M — Accumulated Comprehensive Loss

      The components of accumulated comprehensive loss at December 31, 20032004 and 20022003 are as follows:

                 
December 31December 31,


2003200220042003




Foreign currency translation adjustmentForeign currency translation adjustment $(1,091) $2,541 Foreign currency translation adjustment $(3,162) $(1,091)
Minimum pension liabilityMinimum pension liability 4,355 5,555 Minimum pension liability  4,838  4,355 
 
 
   
 
 
Total $3,264 $8,096 Total $1,676 $3,264 
 
 
   
 
 

NOTE N — Restructuring and Unusual Charges

      Since 2001, the Company has responded to the economic downturn by reducing costs in a variety of ways, including restructuring businesses and selling non-core manufacturing assets. These activities generated restructuring and asset impairment charges in 2001, 2002 and 2003, as the Company’s restructuring efforts continued and evolved.

      During 2001, the Company recorded restructuring and asset impairment charges aggregating $28,462, primarily related to management’s decision to exit certain under-performing product lines and to close or consolidate certain operating facilities in 2002. The Company’s actions included 1) selling or discontinuing the businesses of Castle Rubber and Ajax Manufacturing, 2) closing the Cicero Flexible Products’ manufacturing facility and discontinue certain product lines, 3) inventory write-downs and other restructuring activities at St. Louis Screw and& Bolt and Tocco, 4) closing twenty ILS supply chain logistics facilities and two ILS manufacturing plants, 5) closing an Aluminum Products machining facility, and 6) write-down of certain Corporate assets to current value. The charges were composed of $11,280 for the impairment of property and equipment and other long-term assets; $10,299 million of cost of goods sold, primarily to write down inventory of discontinued businesses and product lines to current market value; and $6,883 for severance (525 employees) and exit costs. Below is a summary of these charges by segment.

                          
Cost ofCost of
ProductsAssetRestructuringProductsAssetRestructuring
SoldImpairment& SeveranceTotalSoldImpairment& SeveranceTotal








Manufactured Products $8,599 $10,080 $2,030 $20,709  $8,599 $10,080 $2,030 $20,709 
ILS 1,700 600 4,070 6,370   1,700  600  4,070  6,370 
Aluminum Products -0- -0- 783 783   -0-  -0-  783  783 
Corporate -0- 600 -0- 600   -0-  600  -0-  600 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 $10,299 $11,280 $6,883 $28,462  $10,299 $11,280 $6,883 $28,462 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 

      During 2002, the Company recorded further restructuring and asset impairment charges aggregating $19,190, primarily related to management decisions to exit additional product lines and consolidate additional facilities. The Company’s planned actions included 1) selling or discontinuing the businesses of St. Louis Screw and Bolt and Green Bearing, 2) closing five additional supply chain logistics facilities and 3) closing or selling two Aluminum Products manufacturing plants (one of which was closed as of December 31, 2002). The charges were composed of $5,599 for severance (490 employees) and exit costs, $2,700 for pension curtailment costs; $5,628 of costs of goods sold, primarily to write down inventory of discontinued businesses and product lines to current market value; and $5,263 for impairmentimpair-

37


PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

ment of property and equipment and other long-term assets. Below is a summary of these charges by segment.

36


PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

                                  
Cost ofCost of
ProductsAssetRestructuringPensionProductsAssetRestructuringPension
SoldImpairment& SeveranceCurtailmentTotalSoldImpairment& SeveranceCurtailmentTotal










ILS $4,500 $-0- $2,534 $2,000 $9,034  $4,500 $-0- $2,534 $2,000 $9,034 
Manufactured Products 1,128 2,103 2,628 700 6,559   1,128  2,103  2,628  700  6,559 
Aluminum Products -0- 3,160 437 -0- 3,597   -0-  3,160  437  -0-  3,597 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 $5,628 $5,263 $5,599 $2,700 $19,190  $5,628 $5,263 $5,599 $2,700 $19,190 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 

      During the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company continued its multi-year efforts to position the Company for renewed, more profitable growth and recorded restructuring and asset impairment charges aggregating $19,446. The action primarily related to restructuring at the Company’s Forge Group resulting from a decision to shut down its locomotive crankshaft forging plant after entering into a long-term supply contract to purchase these forgings from a third party. The charges were composed of $990 for exit costs; $638 of cost of goods sold primarily to write down inventory of discontinued product lines to current market value; $1,767 for pension curtailment and multi-employer pension plan withdrawal costs resulting primarily from the termination of union representation at the locomotive crankshaft forging plant and another Manufactured Products manufacturing facility and the closure of an Aluminum Products manufacturing plant; and $16,051 for impairment of property and equipment and other long-term assets. Below is a summary of these charges by segment.

                                  
Cost ofCost of
ProductsAssetRestructuringPensionProductsAssetRestructuringPension
SoldImpairment& SeveranceCurtailmentTotalSoldImpairment& SeveranceCurtailmentTotal










Manufactured Products $638 $16,051 $990 $1,600 $19,279  $638 $16,051 $990 $1,600 $19,279 
Aluminum Products -0- -0- -0- 167 167   -0-  -0-  -0-  167  167 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 $638 $16,051 $990 $1,767 $19,446  $638 $16,051 $990 $1,767 $19,446 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 

The accrued liability for severance and exit costs and related cash payments consisted of:

        
Severance and exit charges recorded in 2001 $6,883  $6,883 
Cash payments made in 2001 (2,731)  (2,731)
 
  
 
Balance at December 31, 2001 4,152   4,152 
Severance and exit charges recorded in 2002 5,599   5,599 
Cash payments made in 2002 (5,706)  (5,706)
 
  
 
Balance at December 31, 2002 4,045   4,045 
Severance and exit charges recorded in 2003 990   990 
Cash payments made in 2003 (2,500)  (2,500)
 
  
 
Balance at December 31, 2003 $2,535 
Balance at December 31, 2004  2,535 
Severance and exit charges recorded in 2004  -0- 
Cash payments made in 2004  (2,073)
 
  
 
Balance at December 31, 2004 $462 
 
 

      As of December 31, 2003,2004, all of the 525 employees identified in 2001 and all but 5 of the 490 employees identified in 2002 had been terminated. The workforce reductions under the restructuring plan consisted of hourly and salarysalaried employees at various operating facilities due to either closure or consolidation. As of December 31, 2003, the Company had an accrued liability of $2,535 for future estimated employee severance and plant closing payments.

      Idle fixed assets of $6,516 were included in other assets as of December 31, 2003. These consisted primarily of property, plant and equipment of two idled aluminum casting plants, for which the Com-

3738


 

PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

panyAs of December 31, 2004, the Company had an accrued liability of $462 for future estimated employee severance and plant closing payments.

      Idle fixed assets of $6,040 were included in other assets as of December 31, 2004. These consisted primarily of property, plant and equipment of two idled aluminum casting plants, for which the Company is evaluating new products and technologies. These assets may either be reclassified to property, plant and equipment if placed in service, or sold. They are currently carried at estimated fair value.

      At December 31, 2003,2004, the Company’s balance sheet reflected assets held for sale at their estimated current value of $2,321$3,027 for inventory, property, plant and equipment and other long-term assets. Net sales for the businesses that were included in net assets held for sale were $ -0- in 2004, $1,139 in 2003, and $19,159 in 2002, and $25,356 in 2001.2002. Operating income (loss), excluding restructuring and unusual charges for these entities were $ -0- in 2004, $(32) in 2003, and $(334) in 2002,2002.

NOTE O — Derivatives and $703Hedging

      The Company recognizes all derivative financial instruments as either assets or liabilities at fair value. The Company has no derivative instruments that are classified as fair value hedges. Changes in 2001.the fair value of derivative instruments that are classified as cash flow hedges are recognized in other comprehensive income until such time as the hedged items are recognized in net income.

38      During the second quarter of 2004, the Company entered into forward contracts, for the purpose of hedging exposure to changes in the value of accounts receivable in Euros against the US dollar, for a notional amount of $5,075, of which $500 was outstanding at December 31, 2004. These transactions are considered cash flow hedges and, therefore, the fair market value at December 31, 2004 of a $75 loss, has been recognized in other comprehensive income (loss). Because there is no ineffectiveness on the cash flow hedges, all changes in fair value of these derivatives are recorded in equity and not included in the current period’s income statement. The $75 of loss on the fair value of the hedges is classified in current accrued liabilities. The Company recognized $169 of foreign currency losses upon settlement of the forward contracts.

39


 

Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements withWith Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

       There were no changes in nor disagreements with Park-Ohio’sthe Company’s independent auditors on accounting and financial disclosure matters within the two-year period ended December 31, 2003.2004.

 
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

      As of December 31, 2003,2004, management, including our chief executive officerChief Executive Officer and chief financial officer,Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon, and as of the date of, that evaluation, our chief executive officerChief Executive Officer and chief financial officerChief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective, in all material respects, to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required.

Changes in internal controls

      There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of 20032004 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Assessment of the Effectiveness of the Company’s Internal Control over Financial Reporting

      Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Management carried out an evaluation, with participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004. The framework on which such evaluation was based is contained in the report entitled “Internal Control — Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the “COSO Report”). Management has identified no material weakness in internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s management has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 based on the framework contained in the COSO Report, and has prepared Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting included at page 16 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

      Ernst & Young LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, have issued an attestation report on the Company’s management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004. This attestation report is included at page 17 of this Form 10-K.

Item 9B. Other Information.

       None.

40


Part III

Item 10.Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

       Information required by this item has been omitted pursuant to General Instruction I of Form 10-K.

Item 11.Executive Compensation

       Information required by this item has been omitted pursuant to General Instruction I of Form 10-K.

Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

       Information required by this item has been omitted pursuant to General Instruction I of Form 10-K.

 
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

       Information required by this item has been omitted pursuant to General Instruction I of Form 10-K.

Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services

       The following table presents fees for professional audit services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for the audit of the Company’s and its parent’s annual financial statements for the years ended December 31, 20032004 and 2002:2003:

                
2003200220042003




Audit fees $401,000 $427,000  $1,264,000 $568,500 
Audit-related fees  58,000  48,000 
Tax fees 67,250 71,000   65,000  67,250 
Audit-related fees 215,500 204,000 

      Fees for audit services include fees associated with the annual audit, the review’sreviews of the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and statutory audits required internationally.internationally, services associated with the Company’s issuance of the 8.375% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014 and the audit of management’s assessment of internal control under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Audit-related fees principally included fees in connection with pension plan audits and accounting consultation. Tax fees includedinclude tax compliance tax advice and tax planning. Park-Ohio is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Holdings and does not have a separate audit committee. Holdings’ audit committee has adopted a pre-approval policy for audit and non-audit related services. For a description of Holdings’ pre-approval policies for audit and non-audit related services and the percentage of audit-related, tax and all other services that were not pre-approved by Holdings’ audit committee pursuant to the de minimis exception, see Holdings’ proxy statement.statement for the 2005 annual meeting of Holdings’ shareholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of Holdings’ fiscal year.

3941


 

Part IV

 
Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K

(a)(1) The following financial statements are included in Part II, Item 8:

     
Page

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting16
Report of Ernst & Young, LLP, Independent AuditorsRegistered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting  17 
Financial Statements
Consolidated balance sheets — December 31, 2003 and 2002Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  18 
Consolidated statements of operationsBalance Sheets — years ended December 31, 2003, 20022004 and 20012003  19 
Consolidated statementsStatements of shareholder’s equityOperations — years endedYears Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 2002 and 20012002  20 
Consolidated statementsStatements of cash flowsShareholder’s Equity — years endedYears Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 2002 and 20012002  21 
Notes to consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002  22 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements23

   (2) Financial Statement Schedules

All Schedulesschedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are not applicable and, therefore, have been omitted.

   (3) Exhibits:

The Exhibitsexhibits filed as part of this Form 10-K are listed on the Exhibit Index immediately preceding such exhibits and are incorporated herein by reference.

(b) Reports on Form 8-K filed inNo annual report or proxy statement covering the fourth quarter of 2003: NoneCompany’s last fiscal year has been or will be circulated to security holders.

Supplemental Information to be furnished with reports filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act by registrants which have not registered securities pursuant to Section 12 of the Act.

No annual report or proxy statement covering the Company’s last fiscal year has been or will be circulated to security holders.

4042


 

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES INC. (Registrant)

 By: /s/ RICHARD P. ELLIOTT


 Richard P. Elliott, Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer

Date:     March 29, 200421, 2005

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

     
*

Edward F. Crawford
 Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director 
 
*

Richard P. Elliott
 Vice President — and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)  
*

Matthew V. Crawford
 President and Director  
*

Patrick V. Auletta
Director
*

Kevin R. Greene
 Director  
*

Lewis E. Hatch, Jr.
 Director March 29, 200421, 2005
*

DanielDan T. Moore
 Director  
*

Lawrence O. Selhorst
 Director  
*

Ronna Romney
 Director  
*

James W. Wert
 Director  

The undersigned, pursuant to a Power of Attorney executed by each of the Directors and officers identified above and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, by signing his name hereto, does hereby sign and execute this report on behalf of each of the persons noted above, in the capacities indicated.

March 29, 200421, 2005
 By: /s/ ROBERT D. VILSACK


 Robert D. Vilsack, Attorney-in-Fact

4143


 

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC.

For the Year Ended December 31, 20032004

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit

3.1Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 10-K of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. for the year ended December 31, 1998, SEC File No. 000-03134 and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof)
3.2Code of Regulations of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Form 10-K of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. for the year ended December 31, 1998, SEC File No. 000-03134 and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof)
4.1Indenture, dated June 3, 1999 by and among Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. and Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A., as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.2 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4, filed on July 23, 1999, SEC File No. 333-83117 and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof)
4.2Credit and Security Agreement among Park-Ohio Industries, Inc., and various financial institutions dated December 22, 2000 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Form 10-K of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2000, SEC File No. 000-03134 and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof)
4.3First amendment, dated March 12, 2001, to the Credit and Security Agreement among Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. and various financial institutions (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Form 10-K of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2000, SEC File No. 000-03134 and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof)
4.4Second amendment, dated June 30, 2001, to the Credit and Security Agreement among Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. and various financial institutions (filed as Exhibit 4 to the Form 10-Q of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. for the quarter ended June 30, 2001, SEC File No. 000-03134 and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof)
4.5Third amendment, dated November 14, 2001, to the Credit and Security Agreement among Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. and various financial institutions (filed as Exhibit 4 to the Form 8-K of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. dated December 14, 2001, SEC File No. 000-03134 and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof)
4.6Fourth amendment, dated as of December 31, 2001, to the Credit and Security Agreement among Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. and various financial institutions (filed as Exhibit 4.6 to the Form 10-K of Park-Ohio Holdings, Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2001, SEC File No. 000-03134 and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof)
4.7Fifth amendment, dated as of September 30, 2002, to the Credit and Security Agreement among Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. and various financial institutions (filed as Exhibit 4 to the Form 10-Q of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, SEC File No. 000-03134 and incorporated by reference and made a part of hereof.)
4.8Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated November 5, 2003, among Park-Ohio Industries, Inc., the other loan parties party thereto, the lenders party thereto, Bank One, NA and Banc One Capital Markets Inc. (filed as Exhibit 4 to the Form 10-Q of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, SEC File No. 000-03134 and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof)
10.1Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. and each of its directors and certain officers (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-K of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. for the year ended December 31, 1998, SEC File No. 000-03134 and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof)
10.2*Amended and Restated 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed as Appendix A to the Definitive Proxy Statement of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp., filed on April 23, 2001, SEC File No. 000-03134 and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof)
12.1Computation of Ratios
21.1List of Subsidiaries of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc.
23.1Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
24.1Power of Attorney
     
Exhibit

 3.1 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 10-K of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1998, SEC File No. 333-43005 and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof)
 3.2 Code of Regulations of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Form 10-K of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1998, SEC File No. 333-43005 and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof)
 4.1 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated November 5, 2003, among Park-Ohio Industries, Inc., the other loan parties party thereto, the lenders party thereto, Bank One, NA and Banc One Capital Markets Inc. (filed as Exhibit 4 to the Form 10-Q of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, SEC File No. 000-03134 and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof)
 4.2 First Amendment, dated September 30, 2004, to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated November 5, 2003, among Park-Ohio Industries, Inc., the other loan parties thereto, the lenders party thereto, Bank One, NA and Bank One Capital Markets, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. on October 1, 2004, SEC File No. 000-03134 and incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof)
 4.3 Second Amendment, dated December 29, 2004, to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated November 5, 2003, among Park-Ohio Industries, Inc., the other loan parties thereto, the lenders party thereto and JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA (successor by merger to Bank One, NA), as agent (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. filed on January 5, 2005, SEC File No. 000-03134 and incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof)
 4.4 Indenture, dated as of November 30, 2004, among Park-Ohio Industries, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein) and Wells Fargo Bank, NA, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. filed on December 6, 2004, SEC File No. 000-03134 and incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof)
 10.1 Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. and each of its directors and certain officers (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-K of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. for the year ended December 31, 1998, SEC File No. 333-43005 and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof)
 10.2 Registration Rights Agreement, dated November 30, 2004, among Park-Ohio Industries, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein) and the initial purchasers that are party thereto (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. filed on December 6, 2004, SEC File No. 000-03134 and incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof)
 12.1 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 21.1 List of Subsidiaries of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc.
 24.1 Power of Attorney
 31.1 Principal Executive Officer’s Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 31.2 Principal Financial Officer’s Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 32.1 Certification requirement under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


44

Exhibit

31.1Principal Executive Officer’s Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2Principal Financial Officer’s Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32Certification requirement under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002