UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORMForm 10-K
   
þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20062009
OR
   
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period fromto
Commission file number 0-26481000-26481
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
   
New YorkNEW YORK 16-0816610
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)No.)
   
220 Liberty Street, Warsaw, NYLIBERTY STREET, WARSAW, NEW YORK 14569
(Address of principal executive offices) (ZipZIP Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
585-786-1100(585) 786-1100
Securities registered pursuant tounder Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
   
Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
Common stock, par value $0.01$.01 per share NASDAQ Global Select Market
Securities registered pursuant tounder Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
NoneNONE
Indicate by check mark if the registrantregsitrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
YESYeso NONoþ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
YESYeso NONoþ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the precedingpast 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YESYesþ NONoo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).Yeso Noo
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Formform 10-K or any amendmentsamendment to this Form 10-K.þo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrantregsitrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.smaller reporting company. See definitiondefinitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filerfiler” and large accelerated filer”“smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One):
Large Accelerated filero      Accelerated filerþ
Large accelerated fileroAccelerated filerþNon-accelerated fileroSmaller reporting companyo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YESYeso NONoþ
The aggregate market value of common stockequity held by non-affiliates of the registrant, as computed by reference to the June 30, 20062009 closing price reported by NASDAQ, was $221,734,895.$138,170,500.
As of March 2, 20071, 2010, there were issued and outstanding, exclusive of treasury shares, 11,336,73010,919,608 shares of the registrant’s common stock.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant’s proxy statement to be filed withProxy Statement for the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the 20072010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.III.
 
 

 


 

FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC.
2006 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
     
PAGE
PART I
     
  35
 
  19 
  2124
 
  2225
 
  23
2326 
     
26
    
PART II
     
  2327
 
  2629
 
  2832
 
  5157
 
  5359
 
  90104
 
  90104
 
  92104 
     
     
  92105
 
  92105
 
  92105
 
  93105
 
  93105 
     
     
  93106
108
 
 EX-10.21Exhibit 12
 EX-10.22Exhibit 21
 EX-21Exhibit 23
 EX-23Exhibit 31.1
 EX-31.1Exhibit 31.2
 EX-31.2Exhibit 32
 EX-32.1Exhibit 99.1
 EX-32.2Exhibit 99.2

2


PART I
FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION
Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K that are based on other than historical data are forward-looking within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements provide current expectations or forecasts of future events and include, among others:
statements with respect to the beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, guidelines, expectations, anticipations, and future financial condition, results of operations and performance of Financial Institutions, Inc. (“the parent” or “FII”) and its subsidiaries (collectively “the Company,” “we,” “our,” “us”);
statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words “may,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “projects,” or similar expressions.
These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, nor should they be relied upon as representing management’s views as of any subsequent date. Forward-looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties and actual results may differ materially from those presented, either expressed or implied, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including, but not limited to, those presented in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis. Factors that might cause such differences include, but are not limited to:
the Company’s ability to successfully execute its business plans, manage its risks, and achieve its objectives;
changes in political and economic conditions, including the political and economic effects of the current economic crisis and other major developments, including wars, military actions and terrorist attacks;
changes in financial market conditions, either internationally, nationally or locally in areas in which the Company conducts its operations, including without limitation, reduced rates of business formation and growth, commercial and residential real estate development and real estate prices;
fluctuations in markets for equity, fixed-income, commercial paper and other securities, including availability, market liquidity levels, and pricing;
changes in interest rates, the quality and composition of the loan and securities portfolios, demand for loan products, deposit flows and competition;
acquisitions and integration of acquired businesses;
increases in the levels of losses, customer bankruptcies, claims and assessments;
changes in fiscal, monetary, regulatory, trade and tax policies and laws, including policies of the United States (“U.S.”) Department of Treasury (the “Treasury”) and the Federal Reserve Board (“FRB”);
the Company’s participation or lack of participation in governmental programs implemented under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act (“EESA”) and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (“ARRA”), including without limitation the Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”), the Capital Purchase Program (“CPP”), and the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (“TLGP”) and the impact of such programs and related regulations on the Company and on international, national, and local economic and financial markets and conditions;
the impact of the EESA and the ARRA and related rules and regulations on the business operations and competitiveness of the Company and other participating American financial institutions, including the impact of the executive compensation limits of these acts, which may impact the ability of the Company and other American financial institutions to retain and recruit executives and other personnel necessary for their businesses and competitiveness;
the impact of certain provisions of the EESA and ARRA and related rules and regulations on the attractiveness of governmental programs to mitigate the effects of the current economic crisis, including the risks that certain financial institutions may elect not to participate in such programs, thereby decreasing the effectiveness of such programs;
continuing consolidation in the financial services industry;
new litigation or changes in existing litigation;
success in gaining regulatory approvals, when required;
changes in consumer spending and savings habits;
increased competitive challenges and expanding product and pricing pressures among financial institutions;

- 3 -


FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION (Continued)
demand for financial services in the Company’s market areas;
inflation and deflation;
technological changes and the Company’s implementation of new technologies;
the Company’s ability to develop and maintain secure and reliable information technology systems;
legislation or regulatory changes which adversely affect the Company’s operations or business;
the Company’s ability to comply with applicable laws and regulations;
changes in accounting policies or procedures as may be required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or regulatory agencies;
increased costs of deposit insurance and changes with respect to Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance coverage levels; and
further declines in the market value of the Company’s publicly traded stock price or declines in the Company’s ability to generate future cash flows may increase the potential that goodwill recorded on the Company’s consolidated statement of financial position be designated as impaired and that the Company may incur a goodwill write-down in the future.
The Company cautions readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made, and advises readers that various factors, including those described above, could affect the Company’s financial performance and could cause the Company’s actual results or circumstances for future periods to differ materially from those anticipated or projected. See also Item 1A, Risk Factors, in this Form 10-K.
Except as required by law, the Company does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation to publicly release any revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

- 4 -


ItemITEM 1. BusinessBUSINESS
Forward Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K, especially in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In general, the use of such words as estimate, project, believe, intend, anticipate, plan, seek, expect and similar expressions are intended to identify “forward-looking statements” and may include:
Statements regarding our business plans, and prospects;
Statements of our goals, intentions and expectations;
Statements regarding our growth and operating strategies;
Statements regarding the quality of our loan and investment portfolios; and
Estimates of our risks and future costs and benefits.
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements. In order to comply with the terms of the safe harbor, the Company notes that a variety of factors could cause the Company’s actual results and experience to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the Company’s forward-looking statements. Some of the risks and uncertainties that may affect the operations, performance, development and results of the Company’s business, the interest rate sensitivity of its assets and liabilities, and the adequacy of its allowance for loan losses, include but are not limited to the following:
Significantly increased competition between depository and other financial institutions;
Changes in the interest rate environment that reduces our margins or the fair value of financial instruments;
General economic conditions, either nationally or in our market areas, that are worse than expected;
Declines in the value of real estate, equipment, livestock and other assets serving as collateral for our loans outstanding;
Legislative or regulatory changes that adversely affect our business;
Changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits;
Changes in accounting policies and practices, as generally accepted in the United States of America; and
Actions taken by regulators with jurisdiction over the Company or its subsidiaries.
The Company cautions readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made, and advises readers that various factors, including those described above, could affect the Company’s financial performance and could cause the Company’s actual results or circumstances for future periods to differ materially from those anticipated or projected.
Except as required by law, the Company does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to publicly release any revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

3


GeneralGENERAL
Financial Institutions, Inc. (“FII”),is a bankfinancial holding company organized in 1931 under the laws of New York State and(“New York” or “NYS”). Through its subsidiaries, (collectively the “Company”) provideincluding its wholly-owned, New York State chartered banking subsidiary, Five Star Bank, Financial Institutions, Inc. provides deposit, lending and other financial services to individuals and businesses in Central and Western New York State.York. All references in this Form 10-K to the parent company are to Financial Institutions, Inc. (“FII”). Unless otherwise indicated or unless the context requires otherwise, all references in this Form 10-K to “the Company” means Financial Institutions, Inc. and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. Five Star Bank is referred to as Five Star Bank, “FSB” or “the Bank”. The Companyparent company is subject to regulation by certain federal and state agencies.
The Company for many years operated under a decentralized, “Super Community Bank” business model, withlegal entity separate and largely autonomousdistinct from its subsidiaries, assisting those subsidiaries by providing financial resources and management. The Company’s executive offices are located at 220 Liberty Street, Warsaw, New York.
We conduct our business primarily through our banking subsidiary, banks whose Boards and management had the authority to operate within guidelines set forthFive Star Bank, which adopted its current name in broad corporate policies established at the holding company level. During 2005 FII’s Board of Directors decided to implement changes to the Company’s business model and governance structure. Effective December 3, 2005,when the Company merged three of its bank subsidiaries, Wyoming County Bank, (100% owned) (“WCB”), National Bank of Geneva (100% owned) (“NBG”) and Bath National Bank (100% owned) (“BNB”) into its New York State-charteredchartered bank subsidiary, First Tier Bank & Trust, (100% owned) (“FTB”), which was then renamed Five Star Bank (“FSB” or the “Bank”). The merger was accounted for at historical cost as a combination of entities under common control.
FII formerly qualified as a financial holding company under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which allowed expansion ofBank. In addition, our business operations to include financial services subsidiaries, namely,a broker-dealer subsidiary, Five Star Investment Services, Inc. (100% owned) (“FSIS”) (formerly known as The FI Group, Inc. (“FIGI”)) and the Burke Group, Inc. (formerly 100% owned) (“BGI”), collectively referred to as the “Financial Services Group” (“FSG”). FSIS is a brokerage subsidiary that commenced operations as a start-up company in March 2000. BGI, an employee benefits and compensation consulting firm, was acquired by the Company in October 2001. During 2005, the Company sold the stock of BGI and its results have been reported separately as a discontinued operation in the consolidated statements of income. Since the sale of BGI occurred during 2005, there are no assets or liabilities associated with the discontinued operation recorded at December 31, 2006 or 2005. BGI’s cash flows are shown in the consolidated statements of cash flows by activity (operating, investing and financing) consistent with the applicable source of cash flow.
During 2003, FII terminated its financial holding company status and now operates as a bank holding company. The change in status did not affect the non-financial subsidiaries or activities being conducted by the Company, although future acquisitions or expansions of non-financial activities may require prior Federal Reserve Board (“FRB”) approval and will be limited to those that are permissible for bank holding companies.
In February 2001, the Company formed FISI Statutory Trust I (100% owned) (the “Trust”) and capitalized the entity with a $502,000 investment in the Trust’s common securities. The Trust was formed to facilitate the private placement of $16.2 million in capital securities (“trust preferred securities”). In accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,”securities. FII capitalized the Trust is not includedwith a $502 thousand investment in the Trust’s common securities. The Trust is accounted for as an unconsolidated subsidiary. Therefore, the Company’s consolidation; insteadconsolidated statements of financial position reflect the $16.7 million in junior subordinated debentures are recorded as a liability and a $502,000the $502 thousand investment in the trust recordedTrust’s common securities is included in other assets in the Company’s consolidated statements of financial condition.assets.
Available InformationOTHER INFORMATION
This annual report, including the exhibits and schedules filed as part of the annual report, may be inspected at the public reference facility maintained by the SEC at its public reference room at 100 F. Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, DC 20549 and copies of all or any part thereof may be obtained from that office upon payment of the prescribed fees. You may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the public reference room and you can request copies of the documents upon payment of a duplicating fee, by writing to the SEC. In addition, the SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrants, including us, that file electronically with the SEC which can be accessed at www.sec.gov.
The Company also makes available, free of charge through its website atwww.fiiwarsaw.com, all reports filed with the SEC, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, as well as any amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after those

4


documents are filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. Information available on our website is not a part of, and is not incorporated into, this annual report on Form 10-K.
Executive Officers and Other Significant Employees of the Registrant
The following table sets forth current information regarding executive officers and other significant employees (ages are as of December 31, 2006).
           
Name Age Starting In Positions/Offices
Peter G. Humphrey  52   1983  President and Chief Executive Officer.
           
James T. Rudgers  57   2004  Executive Vice President and Chief of Community Banking. From 2002 – 2004 was Executive Vice President of Retail Banking at Hudson United Bank Corporation. From 1997 – 2002 was Senior Vice President and Principal of Manchester Humphreys, Inc.
           
Ronald A. Miller  58   1996  Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary.
           
George D. Hagi  54   2006  Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer. From 1997 – 2005 was Senior Vice President and Director of Risk Management at First National Bankshares of Florida and FNB Corp.
           
John J. Witkowski  45   2005  Senior Vice President and Regional President/Retail Banking Executive. From 1993 – 2005 was Senior Vice President and Director of Sales for Business Banking/Client Development Group at Bank of America.
           
Martin K. Birmingham  41   2005  Senior Vice President and Regional President/Commercial Market Executive. From 1989 – 2005 was Senior Team Leader and Regional President of the Rochester Market at Bank of America.
           
Kevin B. Klotzbach  53   2001  Senior Vice President and Treasurer. From 1999 – 2001 was Chief Investment Officer at Greater Buffalo Savings Bank.
           
Bruce H. Nagle  58   2006  Senior Vice President and Director of Human Resources. From 2000 – 2006 was Vice President of Human Resources at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.
           
Richard J. Harrison  62   2003  Senior Vice President and Senior Retail Lending Administrator. From 2000 – 2003 was Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer at Savings Bank of the Fingerlakes.
Market Area and CompetitionMARKET AREAS AND COMPETITION
The Company provides a wide range of consumer and commercial banking and financial services to individuals, municipalities and businesses through a network of 50 branches51 offices and over 70 ATMs in fifteenfourteen contiguous counties of Western and Central New York State:York: Allegany, Cattaraugus, Cayuga, Chautauqua, Chemung, Erie, Genesee, Livingston, Monroe, Ontario, Schuyler, Seneca, Steuben, Wyoming and Yates Counties.
The Company’s market area is geographically and economically diversified in that it serves both rural markets and the larger more affluent markets of suburban Rochester and suburban Buffalo. Rochester and Buffalo are the two largest cities in New York State outside of New York City, with combined metropolitan area populations of over two million people. The Company anticipates increasing its presence in the marketsand around these two cities.metropolitan statistical areas in the coming years.

5


The Company faces significant competition in both making loans and attracting deposits, as Western and Central New York have a high density of financial institutions. The Company’s competition for loans comes principally from commercial banks, savings banks, savings and loan associations, mortgage banking companies, credit unions, insurance companies and other financial service companies. Its most direct competition for deposits has historically come from commercial banks, savings banks and credit unions. The Company faces additional competition for deposits from non-depository competitors such as the mutual fund industry, securities and brokerage firms and insurance companies.

- 5 -


EmployeesLENDING ACTVITIES
General
The Company had approximately 640 full-time equivalent employees (“FTEs”) at December 31, 2006.
Operating Segments
The Company’s primary reportable segment is its subsidiary bank, Five Star Bank (“FSB”). During 2005, the Company completed a strategic realignment, which involved the merger of its subsidiary banks into a single state-chartered bank, FSB. The Financial Services Group (“FSG”) was also deemed a reportable segment in prior years, as the Company evaluated the performance of this line of business separately. However, with the sale of BGI during 2005, the FSG segment no longer meets the thresholds included in SFAS No. 131 for separation.
Lending Activities
General.The Bank offers a broad range of loans including commercial and agricultural working capital and revolving lines of credit, commercial and agricultural mortgages, equipment loans, crop and livestock loans, residential mortgage loans and home equity loans and lines of credit, home improvement loans, automobile loans and personal loans. Most newlyNewly originated and refinanced fixed rate residential mortgage loans are either retained in the Company’s portfolio or sold into the secondary market and servicing rights are retained.
Lending PhilosophyThe Company continually evaluates and Objectives. The Bank has thoroughly evaluated and updatedupdates its lending policy in recent years. The revisions to the loan policy include a renewed focus on lending philosophy and credit objectives.
policy. The key elements of the Bank’sCompany’s lending philosophy include the following:
To ensure consistent underwriting, all employees must share a common view of the risks inherent in lending activities as well as the standards to be applied in underwriting and managing credit risk;
Pricing of credit products should be risk-based;
The loan portfolio must be diversified to limit the potential impact of negative events; and
Careful, timely exposure monitoring through dynamic use of our risk rating system, is required to provide early warning and assure proactive management of potential problems.
The Bank’s credit objectives are as follows:
Compete effectively and service the legitimate credit needs of our target market;
Enhance our reputation for superior quality and timely delivery of products and services;
Provide pricing that reflects the entire relationship and is commensurate with the risk profiles of our borrowers;
Retain, develop and acquire profitable, multi-product, value added relationships with high quality borrowers;
Focus on government guaranteed lending and establish a specialization in this area to meet the needs of the small businesses in our communities; and
Comply with the relevant laws and regulations.

6


Loan Approval Process.The Bank’s loan policy establishes standardized underwriting guidelines, as well as the standards to be applied in underwriting and managing credit risk;
Pricing of credit products should be risk-based;
The loan approval processportfolio must be diversified to limit the potential impact of negative events; and the appropriate committee structures necessary to facilitate and insure the highest possible loan quality decision-making in a
Careful, timely and businesslike manner. The policy establishes requirements for extending credit based on the size,exposure monitoring through dynamic use of our risk rating and type of credit involved. The policy also sets limits on individual loan officer lending authority and various forms of joint lending authority, while designating which loans aresystem is required to be approved at the committee level.provide early warning and assure proactive management of potential problems.
Loan Review Program.Commercial, Commercial Real Estate and Agricultural Lending
The Bank’s policy includes loan reviews, under the supervision of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and directed by the Chief Risk Officer, to review the Bank’s credit function in order to render an independent and objective evaluation of the Bank’s asset quality and credit administration process.
Risk Assessment Process.Risk ratings are assigned to loans in the commercial, commercial real estate and agricultural portfolios. The risk ratings are specifically used as follows:
Profile the risk and exposure in the loan portfolio and identify developing trends and relative levels of risk;
Identify deteriorating credits; and
Reflect the probability that a given customer may default on its obligations.
Through the loan approval process, loan administration and loan review program, management continuously monitors the credit risk profile of the Bank and assesses the overall quality of the loan portfolio and adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.
Delinquencies and Nonperforming Assets.The Bank has several procedures in place to assist in maintaining the overall quality of its loan portfolio. Delinquent loan reports are monitored by credit administration to identify adverse levels and trends. Loans are generally placed on nonaccruing status and cease accruing interest when the payment of principal or interest is delinquent for 90 days, or earlier in some cases, unless the loan is in the process of collection and the underlying collateral further supports the carrying value of the loan.
Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is established through charges or credits to earnings in the form of a provision (credit) for loan losses. The allowance reflects management’s estimate of the amount of probable loan losses in the portfolio, based on the following factors:
Specific allocations for individually analyzed credits;
Risk assessment process;
Historical charge-off experience;
Evaluation of the loan portfolio with loan reviews;
Levels and trends in delinquent and nonaccruing loans;
Trends in volume and terms;
Collateral values;
Effects of changes in lending policy;
Experience, ability and depth of management;
National and local economic trends and conditions; and
Concentrations of credit.
Management presents a quarterly review of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses to the Company’s Board of Directors. In order to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, the risk rating and delinquency status of loans and other factors are considered, such as collateral value, government guarantees, portfolio composition, trends in economic conditions and the financial strength of borrowers. Specific allocations for individually evaluated loans are established when required. An allowance is also established for groups of loans with similar risk characteristics, based upon average historical charge-off experience taking into account levels

7


and trends in delinquencies, loan volumes, economic and industry trends and concentrations of credit. See also the sections titled “Analysis of Allowance for Loan Losses” and “Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses” in Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation”.
Commercial.The BankCompany originates commercial loans in its primary market areas and underwrites them based on the borrower’s ability to service the loan from operating income. The BankCompany offers a broad range of commercial lending products, including term loans and lines of credit. Short and medium-term commercial loans, primarily collateralized, are made available to businesses for working capital (including inventory and receivables), business expansion (including acquisition of real estate, expansion and improvements) and the purchase of equipment. As a general practice, where possible, a collateral lien is placed on any available real estate, equipment or other assets owned by the borrower and a personal guarantee of the owner is obtained. AtAs of December 31, 2006, $29.32009, $49.5 million, or 27.7%27%, of the aggregate commercial loan portfolio were at fixed rates, while $76.5$136.9 million, or 72.3%73%, were at variable rates. The BankCompany utilizes government loan guarantee programs where available and appropriate. See “Government Guarantee Programs” below.
Commercial Real Estate. In addition to commercial loans secured by real estate, the BankCompany makes commercial real estate loans to finance the purchase of real property, which generally consists of real estate with completed structures. Commercial real estate loans are secured by first liens on the real estate and are typically amortized over a 10 to 20 year period. The underwriting analysis includes credit verification, appraisals and a review of the borrower’s financial condition. Atcondition and repayment capacity. As of December 31, 2006, $40.42009, $78.2 million, or 16.6%25%, of the aggregate commercial real estate loan portfolio were at fixed rates, while $203.6$230.7 million, or 83.4%75%, were at variable rates.
Agricultural.Agricultural loans are offered for short-term crop production, farm equipment and livestock financing and agricultural real estate financing, including term loans and lines of credit. Short and medium-term agricultural loans, primarily collateralized, are made available for working capital (crops and livestock), business expansion (including acquisition of real estate, expansion and improvement) and the purchase of equipment. AtAs of December 31, 2006, $14.12009, $11.3 million, or 24.9%27%, of the agricultural loan portfolio were at fixed rates, while $42.7$30.6 million, or 75.1%73%, were at variable rates. The BankCompany utilizes government loan guarantee programs where available and appropriate. See “Government Guarantee Programs” below.
Residential Real Estate.Government Guarantee Programs
The Bank originates fixedCompany participates in government loan guarantee programs offered by the Small Business Administration (“SBA”), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Rural Economic and variable rate one-to-four family residential mortgagesCommunity Development and closed-end home equityFarm Service Agency, among others. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had loans collateralizedwith an aggregate principal balance of $44.4 million that were covered by owner-occupied properties locatedguarantees under these programs. The guarantees only cover a certain percentage of these loans. By participating in these programs, the Company is able to broaden its market areas. base of borrowers while minimizing credit risk.
Consumer Lending
The BankCompany offers a variety of real estate loan products which are generally amortized for periods up to 30 years. Loans collateralized by one-to-four family residential real estate generally have been originatedits consumer customers located in amountsWestern and Central New York, including home equity loans and lines of no more than 80%credit, automobile loans, secured installment loans and various other types of appraised value or have mortgage insurance. Mortgage title insurancesecured and hazard insurance are normally required. The Bank sells certain one-to-four family residential mortgages on the secondary mortgage market and typically retains the right to service the mortgages. To assure maximum salability of the residential loan products for possible resale, the Company has formally adopted the underwriting, appraisal, and servicing guidelines of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”) as part of its standard loan policy.unsecured personal loans. At December 31, 2006,2009, outstanding consumer loan balances were concentrated in indirect automobile loans and home equity products.
The Company indirectly originates, through dealers, consumer indirect automobile loans. The consumer indirect loan portfolio is primarily comprised of new and used automobile loans with terms that typically range from 36 to 84 months. The Company has expanded its relationships with franchised new car dealers, primarily in our general market area, and has selectively originated a mix of new and used automobile loans from those dealers. As of December 31, 2009, the residential mortgage servicingconsumer indirect portfolio totaled $355.2$352.6 million, the majoritynearly all of which have been sold to FHLMC. At December 31, 2006, $225.3 million, or 83.9%,were fixed rate automobile loans.

- 6 -


The Company also originates, independently of residential real estatethe indirect loans retained in portfolio were at fixed rates while $43.1 million, or 16.1%, were at variable rates.
Consumer and Home Equity Lines.The Bank originates direct and indirectdescribed above, consumer automobile loans, recreational vehicle loans, boat loans, home improvement loans, closed-end home equity loans, home equity lines of credit, personal loans (collateralized and uncollateralized) and deposit account collateralized loans. The terms of these loans typically range from 12 to 180 months and vary based upon the nature of the collateral and the size of loan. The majority of the consumer lending program is underwritten on a secured basis using the customer’s home or the financed automobile, mobile home, boat or recreational vehicle as collateral. AtAs of December 31, 2006, $153.02009, $121.5 million, or 60.8%53%, of consumer and home equity loans were at fixed rates, while $98.5$108.5 million, or 39.2%47%, were at variable rates.
Government Guarantee Programs. Residential Mortgage Lending
The Bank participatesCompany originates fixed and variable rate one-to-four family residential mortgages collateralized by owner-occupied properties located in its market areas. The Company offers a variety of real estate loan products, which are generally amortized for periods up to 30 years. Loans collateralized by one-to-four family residential real estate generally have been originated in amounts of no more than 80% of appraised value or have mortgage insurance. Mortgage title insurance and hazard insurance are normally required. The Company sells certain one-to-four family residential mortgages to the secondary mortgage market and typically retains the right to service the mortgages. To assure maximum salability of the residential loan products for possible resale, the Company has formally adopted the underwriting, appraisal, and servicing guidelines of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”) as part of its standard loan policy. As of December 31, 2009, the residential mortgage servicing portfolio totaled $349.8 million, the majority of which have been sold to FHLMC. As of December 31, 2009, $103.5 million, or 72%, of residential real estate loans retained in portfolio were at fixed rates, while $40.7 million, or 28%, were at variable rates. The Company does not engage in sub-prime or other high-risk residential mortgage lending as a line-of-business.
Credit Administration
The Company’s loan policy establishes standardized underwriting guidelines, as well as the loan approval process and the committee structures necessary to facilitate and insure the highest possible loan quality decision-making in a timely and businesslike manner. The policy establishes requirements for extending credit based on the size, risk rating and type of credit involved. The policy also sets limits on individual loan officer lending authority and various forms of joint lending authority, while designating which loans are required to be approved at the committee level.
The Company’s credit objectives are as follows:
Compete effectively and service the legitimate credit needs of our target market;
Enhance our reputation for superior quality and timely delivery of products and services;
Provide pricing that reflects the entire relationship and is commensurate with the risk profiles of our borrowers;
Retain, develop and acquire profitable, multi-product, value added relationships with high quality borrowers;
Focus on government guaranteed lending and establish a specialization in this area to meet the needs of the small businesses in our communities; and
Comply with the relevant laws and regulations.
The Company’s policy includes loan guarantee programs offeredreviews, under the supervision of the Audit and Risk Oversight committees of the Board of Directors and directed by the Small Business Administration (or “SBA”), United States DepartmentChief Risk Officer, in order to render an independent and objective evaluation of Agriculture (or “USDA”), Rural Economicthe Company’s asset quality and Community Development (or “RECD”)credit administration process.
Risk ratings are assigned to loans in the commercial, commercial real estate and Farm Service Agency (or “FSA”), among others. At December 31, 2006,agricultural portfolios. The risk ratings are specifically used as follows:
Profile the Bank hadrisk and exposure in the loan portfolio and identify developing trends and relative levels of risk;
Identify deteriorating credits; and
Reflect the probability that a given customer may default on its obligations.
Through the loan approval process, loan administration and loan review program, management seeks to continuously monitor the credit risk profile of the Company and assesses the overall quality of the loan portfolio and adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.
The Company has several procedures in place to assist in maintaining the overall quality of its loan portfolio. Delinquent loan reports are monitored by credit administration to identify adverse levels and trends. Loans, including impaired loans, with an aggregateare generally classified as non-accruing if they are past due as to maturity or payment of principal balanceor interest for a period of $38.7 millionmore than 90 days, unless such loans are well-collateralized and in the process of collection. Loans that were covered by guarantees under these programs. The guarantees only coverare on a certain percentagecurrent payment status or past due less than 90 days may also be classified as non-accruing if repayment in full of these loans. By participating in these programs, the Bankprincipal and/or interest is able to broaden its base of borrowers while minimizing credit risk.uncertain.

8

- 7 -


Investing ActivitiesAllowance for Loan Losses
General.The Bank’sallowance for loan losses is established through charges or credits to earnings in the form of a provision (credit) for loan losses. The allowance reflects management’s estimate of the amount of probable loan losses in the portfolio, based on factors such as:
Specific allocations for individually analyzed credits;
Risk assessment process;
Historical net charge-off experience;
Evaluation of the loan portfolio with loan reviews;
Levels and trends in delinquent and non-accruing loans;
Trends in volume and terms;
Effects of changes in lending policy;
Experience, ability and depth of management;
National and local economic trends and conditions;
Concentrations of credit;
Interest rate environment;
Customer leverage;
Information (availability of timely financial information); and
Collateral values.
The Company’s methodology in the estimation of the allowance for loan losses includes the following broad areas:
1.Impaired commercial, commercial real estate and agricultural loans, generally in excess of $50 thousand are reviewed individually and assigned a specific loss allowance, if considered necessary, in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).
2.The remaining portfolios of commercial, commercial real estate and agricultural loans are segmented by risk rating into the following loan classification categories: uncriticized or pass, special mention and substandard. Uncriticized loans, special mention loans and all substandard loans not assigned a specific loss allowance are assigned allowance allocations based on historical net loan charge-off experience for each of the respective loan categories, supplemented with additional reserve amounts, if considered necessary, based upon qualitative factors. These qualitative factors include the levels and trends in delinquencies and non-accruing loans; trends in volume and terms of loans; effects of changes in lending policy; experience, ability, and depth of management; national and local economic conditions; concentrations of credit, interest rate environment; customer leverage; information (availability of timely financial information); and collateral values, among others.
3.The consumer loan portfolio is segmented into six types of loans: residential real estate, home equity loans, home equity lines of credit, consumer direct, consumer indirect, and overdrafts. Allowance allocations for the real estate related loan portfolios (residential and home equity) are based on the average loss experience for the previous eight quarters, supplemented with qualitative factors similar to the elements described above. Allowance allocations for the consumer direct and consumer indirect portfolios are based on vintage analyses performed with loss data collected over the previous 48 months and 36 months, respectively. The allocations on these portfolios are also supplemented with qualitative factors. The allowance allocation for overdrafts is based on an analysis of the aging of overdrafts as of each quarter end with larger loss assumptions assigned by the aging of accounts.
Management presents a quarterly review of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses to the Company’s Board of Directors based on the methodology described above. See also the sections titled “Analysis of Allowance for Loan Losses” and “Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses” in Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

- 8 -


INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES
The Company’s investment securities policy is contained within its overall Asset-Liability Management and Investment Policy. This policy dictates that investment decisions will be made based on the safety of the investment, liquidity requirements, potential returns, cash flow targets, need for collateral and desired risk parameters. In pursuing these objectives, the BankCompany considers the ability of an investment to provide earnings consistent with factors of quality, maturity, marketability, pledgeable nature and risk diversification. The Bank’sCompany’s Treasurer, guided by the ALCO Committee, is responsible for investment portfolio decisions within the established policies.
The Bank’sCompany’s investment securities strategy centers on providing liquidity to meet loan demand and redeeming liabilities, meeting pledging requirements, managing credit risks, managing overall interest rate and credit risks and maximizing portfolio yield. The Company’s current policy generally limits security purchases to the following:
U.S. treasury securities;
U.S. government agency securities, which are securities issued by official Federal government bodies (e.g. the Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”));
U.S. government-sponsored enterprise (“GSE”) securities, which are securities issued by independent organizations that are in part sponsored by the federal government (e.g. the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) system, the Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”));
Mortgage-backed pass-through securities (“MBSs”), collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”) and asset-backed securities (“ABSs”) issued by GNMA, FNMA, FHLMC and the Small Business Associations (“SBA”) and other privately issued investment grade quality securities;
Investment grade municipal securities, including tax, revenue and bond anticipation notes and general obligation bonds;
Certain creditworthy un-rated securities issued by municipalities;
Investment grade corporate debt, certificates of deposit and qualified preferred stock.
Investments in corporate bonds are limited to no more than 10% of total investments and to bonds rated as Baa or better by Moody’s Investor Services, Inc. or BBB or better by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services at the time of purchase.
U.S. treasury securities;
U.S. government agency securities, which are securities issued by official Federal government bodies (e.g. the Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”)) and U.S. government-sponsored enterprise (“GSE”) securities, which are securities issued by independent organizations that are in part sponsored by the federal government (e.g. the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) system, the Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”), FHLMC, SBA and the Federal Farm Credit Bureau (“FFCB”));
Mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) include mortgage-backed pass-through securities (“pass-throughs”) and collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMO”) issued by GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC. See also the section titled “Investing Activities” in Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations;”
Investment grade municipal securities, including revenue, tax and bond anticipation notes, statutory installment notes and general obligation bonds;
Certain creditworthy un-rated securities issued by municipalities;
Certificates of deposit;
Equity securities at the holding company level; and
Limited partnership investments in Small Business Investment Companies (“SBIC”).
Funding ActivitiesSOURCES OF FUNDS
General.Deposits and borrowed funds are theThe Company’s primary sources of the Company’s funds for use in lending, investingare deposits, borrowed funds and for other general purposes. In addition, repayments onrepurchase agreements, scheduled amortization and prepayments of principal from loans and mortgage-backed securities, proceeds from salesmaturities and calls of loans andinvestment securities and cash flows from operations provide additional sources of funds.funds provided by operations.
Deposits.The BankCompany offers a variety of deposit account products with a range of interest rates and terms. The deposit accounts consist of noninterest-bearing demand, interest-bearing demand, savings, money market, club accounts and certificates of deposit. The BankCompany also offers certificates of deposit with balances in excess of $100,000 to local municipalities, businesses, and individuals as well as Individual Retirement Accounts (“IRAs”) and other qualified plan accounts. To enhance its deposit product offerings, the Company provides commercial checking accounts for small to moderately sized commercial businesses, as well as a low-cost checking account service for low-income customers. The flow of deposits is influenced significantly by general economic conditions, changes in money market rates, prevailing interest rates and competition. The Bank’sCompany’s deposits are obtained predominantly from the areas in which its branch offices are located. The BankCompany relies primarily on competitive pricing of its deposit products, customer service and long-standing relationships with customers to attract and retain these deposits. On a secondary basis, theThe Company utilizeshas also utilized certificate of deposit sales in the national brokered market (“brokered deposits”) as a wholesale funding source.
Borrowed Funds.Borrowingssource, however, the Company had no brokered deposits at December 31, 2009. The Company’s borrowings consist mainly of advances entered into with the FHLB, the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”),Reserve’s Term Auction Facility, federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements.
OPERATING SEGMENTS
The Company formerly had a term debt agreement with another commercialCompany’s primary operating segment is its subsidiary bank, that was prepaid during 2006.FSB. The Company’s brokerage subsidiary, FSIS, is also deemed an operating segment; however it does not meet the applicable thresholds for separation.

- 9 -


Junior Subordinated Debentures IssuedSUPERVISION AND REGULATION
General
FII and FSB are subject to Unconsolidated Subsidiary Trust.The Company formed the Trustextensive federal and state laws and regulations that impose restrictions on, and provide for regulatory oversight of, FII’s and FSB’s operations. These laws and regulations are generally intended to protect depositors and not shareholders. Any change in February 2001 to facilitate the private placement of capital securities.
Supervisionany applicable statute or regulation could have a material effect on FII’s and RegulationFSB’s business.
The supervision and regulation of financial and bank holding companies and their subsidiaries is intended primarily for the protection of depositors, the deposit insurance funds regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”)FDIC and the banking system as a whole, and not for the protection of shareholders or creditors of bank holding companies. The various bank regulatory agencies have broad enforcement power over bank holding companies and banks, including the power to impose substantial fines, operational restrictions and other penalties for violations of laws and regulations.
The Company is also affected by various governmental requirements and regulations, general economic conditions, and the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and the FRB. The monetary policies of the FRB influence to a significant extent the overall growth of loans, investments, deposits, interest rates charged on loans, and interest rates paid on deposits. The nature and impact of future changes in monetary policies are often not predictable.
The following description summarizes some of the laws to which the Company is subject. References to applicable statutes and regulations are brief summaries and do not claim to be complete. They are qualified in their entirety by reference to such statutes and regulations. Management believes the Company is in compliance in all material respects with these laws and regulations. Changes in the laws, regulations or policies that impact the Company cannot necessarily be predicted, but they may have a material effect on the business and earningsCompany’s consolidated financial position, consolidated results of the Company.operations, or liquidity.
The CompanyRegulation of FII
FII is a bankfinancial holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, and is subject to supervision, regulation and examination by the FRB. During 2003, FII terminated its financial holding company status and now operates as a bank holding company. The change in status did not affect any non-financial subsidiaries or activities being conducted by FII, although future acquisitions or expansions of non-financial activities may require prior FRB approval and will be limited to those that are permissible for bank holding companies. The Bank Holding Company Act and other federal laws subject bank holding companies to particular restrictions on the types of activities in which they may engage, and to a range of supervisory requirements and activities, including regulatory enforcement actions for violations of laws and regulations.
Regulatory Restrictions on Dividends; Source of Strength.It is the policy of the FRB that bank holding companies should pay cash dividends on common stock only out of income available over the past year, and only if prospective earnings retention is consistent with the holding company’s expected future needs and financial condition. The policy provides that bank holding companies should not maintain a level of cash dividends that undermines the bank holding company’s ability to serve as a source of strength to its subsidiaries.
Under FRB policy, a bank holding company is expected to act as a source of financial strength to each of its subsidiaries and commit resources to their support. Such support may be required at times when, absent this FRB policy, a holding company may not be inclined to provide it. As discussed below, a bank holding company in certain circumstances could be required to guarantee the capital plan of an undercapitalized banking subsidiary.
Safe and Sound Banking PracticesPractices.. Bank holding companies are not permitted to engage in unsafe and unsound banking practices. The FRB’s Regulation Y, for example, generally requires a holding company to give the FRB prior notice of any redemption or repurchase of its own equity securities, if the consideration to be paid, together with the consideration paid for any repurchases or redemptions in the preceding year, is equal to 10% or more of the company’s consolidated net worth. The FRB may oppose the transaction if it believes that the transaction would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice or would violate any law or regulation. Depending upon the circumstances, the FRB could take the position that paying a dividend would constitute an unsafe or unsound banking practice.
The FRB has broad authority to prohibit activities of bank holding companies and their non-banking subsidiaries which represent unsafe and unsound banking practices or which constitute violations of laws or regulations, and can assess civil money penalties for certain activities conducted on a knowing and reckless basis, if those activities caused a substantial loss to a depository institution. The penalties can be as high as $1,000,000 for each day the activity continues.

10


Anti-Tying RestrictionsRestrictions.. Bank holding companies and their affiliates are prohibited from tying the provision of certain services, such as extensions of credit, to other services offered by a holding company or its affiliates. In 2002, the FRB adopted Regulation W, a comprehensive synthesis of prior opinions and interpretations under Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act. Regulation W contains an extensive discussion of tying arrangements, which could impact the way banks and bank holding companies transact business with affiliates.

- 10 -


Capital Adequacy RequirementsRequirements.. The FRB has adopted a system using risk-based capital guidelines to evaluate the capital adequacy of bank holding companies. Under the guidelines, specific categories of assets are assigned different risk weights, based generally on the perceived credit risk of the asset. These risk weights are multiplied by corresponding asset balances to determine a “risk-weighted” asset base. The guidelines require a minimum total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% (of which at least 4.0% is required to consist of Tier 1 capital elements). Total capital is the sum of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital. As of December 31, 2006,2009, the Company’s ratio of Tier 1 capital to total risk-weighted assets was 15.85%11.95% and the ratio of total capital to total risk-weighted assets was 17.10%13.21%. See also the section titled “Capital Resources” in Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation”Operations” and Note 1610, Regulatory Matters, of the notes to consolidated financial statements.
In addition to the risk-based capital guidelines, the FRB uses a leverage ratio as an additional tool to evaluate the capital adequacy of bank holding companies. The leverage ratio is a company’s Tier 1 capital divided by quarterly average consolidated assets. Certain highly rated bank holding companies may maintain a minimum leverage ratio of 3.0%, but other bank holding companies may be required to maintain a leverage ratio of up to 200 basis points above the regulatory minimum. As of December 31, 2006,2009, the Company’s leverage ratio was 8.91%7.96%.
The federal banking agencies’ risk-based and leverage ratios are minimum supervisory ratios generally applicable to banking organizations that meet certain specified criteria, assuming that they have the highest regulatory rating. Banking organizations not meeting these criteria are expected to operate with capital positions well above the minimum ratios. The federal bank regulatory agencies may set capital requirements for a particular banking organization that are higher than the minimum ratios when circumstances warrant. FRB guidelines also provide that banking organizations experiencing internal growth or making acquisitions will be expected to maintain strong capital positions substantially above the minimum supervisory levels, without significant reliance on intangible assets.
Imposition of Liability for Undercapitalized SubsidiariesSubsidiaries.. Bank regulators are required to take “prompt corrective action” to resolve problems associated with insured depository institutions whose capital declines below certain levels. In the event an institution becomes “undercapitalized,” it must submit a capital restoration plan. The capital restoration plan will not be accepted by the regulators unless each company having control of the undercapitalized institution guarantees the subsidiary’s compliance with the capital restoration plan up to a certain specified amount. Any such guarantee from a depository institutionsinstitution holding company is entitled to a priority of payment in bankruptcy.
The aggregate liability of the holding company of an undercapitalized bank is limited to the lesser of 5% of the institution’s assets at the time it became undercapitalized or the amount necessary to cause the institution to be “adequately capitalized.” The bank regulators have greater power in situations where an institution becomes “significantly” or “critically” undercapitalized or fails to submit a capital restoration plan. For example, a bank holding company controlling such an institution can be required to obtain prior FRB approval of proposed dividends, or might be required to consent to a consolidation or to divest the troubled institution or other affiliates.
Acquisitions by Bank Holding CompaniesCompanies.. The Bank Holding Company Act requires every bank holding company to obtain the prior approval of the FRB before it may acquire all or substantially all of the assets of any bank, or ownership or control of any voting shares of any bank, if after such acquisition it would own or control, directly or indirectly, more than 5% of the voting shares of such bank. In approving bank acquisitions by bank holding companies, the FRB is required to consider the financial and managerial resources and future prospects of the bank holding company and the banks concerned,involved, the convenience and needs of the communities to be served, and various competitive factors.

11


Control AcquisitionsAcquisitions.. The Change in Bank Control Act prohibits a person or group of persons from acquiring “control” of a bank holding company unless the FRB has been notified and has not objected to the transaction. Under a rebuttable presumption established by the FRB, the acquisition of 10% or more of a class of voting stock of a bank holding company with a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, would, under the circumstances set forth in the presumption, constitute acquisition of control of the Company.
In addition, any entity is required to obtain the approval of the FRB under the Bank Holding Company Act before acquiring 25% (5% in the case of an acquirer that is a bank holding company) or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock, or otherwise obtaining control or a “controlling influence” over the Company.

- 11 -


The BankRegulation of FSB
Five Star Bank (“FSB“FSB” or the “Bank”) is a New York State-charteredchartered bank and a member of the Federal Reserve System. The FDIC, through the BankDeposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”), insures deposits of the Bank. The supervision and regulation of FSB subjects the Bank to special restrictions, requirements, potential enforcement actions and periodic examination by the FDIC, the FRB and the New York State Banking Department.Department (“NYSBD”). Because the FRB regulates the holding company parent, the FRB also has supervisory authority that directly affects FSB.
Restrictions on Transactions with Affiliates and InsidersInsiders.. Transactions between the holding company and its subsidiaries, including the Bank, are subject to Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act, and to the requirements of Regulation W. In general, Section 23A imposes limits on the amount of such transactions, and also requires certain levels of collateral for loans to affiliated parties. It also limits the amount of advances to third parties, which are collateralized by the securities, or obligations of FII or its subsidiaries.
Affiliate transactions are also subject to Section 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, and to the requirements of Regulation W which generally requires that certain transactions between the holding company and its affiliates be on terms substantially the same, or at least as favorable to the Bank, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with or involving other nonaffiliated persons.
The restrictions on loans to directors, executive officers, principal shareholders and their related interests (collectively referred to herein as “insiders”) contained in the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation O apply to all insured institutions and their subsidiaries and holding companies. These restrictions include limits on loans to one borrower and conditions that must be met before such a loan can be made. There is also an aggregate limitation on all loans to insiders and their related interests. These loans cannot exceed the institution’s total unimpaired capital and surplus, and the FDIC may determine that a lesser amount is appropriate. Insiders are subject to enforcement actions for knowingly accepting loans in violation of applicable restrictions.
Restrictions on Distribution of Subsidiary Bank Dividends and Assets.Dividends paid by the Bank provide a substantial part of FII’s operating funds and, for the foreseeable future, it is anticipated that dividends paid by the Bank will continue to be its principal source of operating funds. Capital adequacy requirements serve to limit the amount of dividends that may be paid by the subsidiaries. Under federal law, the subsidiaries cannot pay a dividend if, after paying the dividend, a particular subsidiary will be “undercapitalized.” The FDIC may declare a dividend payment to be unsafe and unsound even though the bank would continue to meet its capital requirements after the dividend.
During September 2006, FII requested approval from the NYS Banking Department to pay a $25.0 million cash dividend from FSB to FII. Regulatory approval was necessary as the requested dividend amount exceeded the amount allowable under regulations. During October 2006, FSB received regulatory approval and paid the $25.0 million dividend to FII. FSB will be required to obtain approval from the NYS Banking Department for any future dividend that exceeds the sum of the current year’s net income plus the retained profits for the preceding two years.
Because FII is a legal entity separate and distinct from its subsidiaries, FII’s right to participate in the distribution of assets of any subsidiary upon the subsidiary’s liquidation or reorganization will be subject to the prior claims of the subsidiary’s creditors. In the event of a liquidation or other resolution of an insured depository institution, the

12


claims of depositors and other general or subordinated creditors are entitled to a priority of payment over the claims of holders of any obligation of the institution to its shareholders, including any depository bank holding company (such as FII) or any shareholder or creditor thereof.
Examinations.The New York State Banking Department,NYSBD, the FRB and the FDIC periodically examine and evaluate the Bank. Based upon such examinations, the appropriate regulator may revalue the assets of the institution and require that it establish specific reserves to compensate for the difference between what the regulator determines the value to be and the book value of such assets.
Audit Reports.Insured institutions with total assets of $500 million or more at the beginning of a fiscal year must submit annual audit reports prepared by independent auditors to federal and state regulators. In some instances, the audit report of the institution’s holding company can be used to satisfy this requirement. Auditors must receive examination reports, supervisory agreements and reports of enforcement actions. In addition, financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,GAAP, management’s certifications concerning responsibility for the financial statements, internal controls and compliance with legal requirements designated by the FDIC, and if total assets exceed $1.0 billion, an attestation by the auditor regarding the statements of management relating to the internal controls must be submitted. The FDIC Improvement Act of 1991 requires that independent audit committees be formed, consisting of outside directors only. The committees of institutions with assets of more than $3.0 billion must include members with experience in banking or financial management must have access to outside counsel and must not include representatives of large customers.
Capital Adequacy Requirements.The FDIC has adopted regulations establishing minimum requirements for the capital adequacy of insured institutions. The FDIC may establish higher minimum requirements if, for example, a bank has previously received special attention or has a high susceptibility to interest rate risk. The most recent notification from the FDIC categorized the Bank as well-capitalizedwell capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.
The FDIC’s risk-based capital guidelines generally require banks to have a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to total risk-weighted assets of 4.0% and a ratio of total capital to total risk-weighted assets of 8.0%. The capital categories have the same definitions for the Company. As of December 31, 2006,2009, the ratio of Tier 1 capital to total risk-weighted assets for the Bank was 14.35%11.33% and the ratio of total capital to total risk-weighted assets was 15.61%12.58%. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources” and Note 16 of the notes to consolidated financial statements.
The FDIC’s leverage guidelines require banks to maintain Tier 1 capital of no less than 4.0% of average total assets, except in the case of certain highly rated banks for which the requirement is 3.0% of average total assets. As of December 31, 2006,2009, the ratio of Tier 1 capital to quarterly average total assets (leverage ratio) was 8.06%7.53% for FSB. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources” andFor further discussion, see Note 1610, Regulatory Matters, of the notes to consolidated financial statements.statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

- 12 -


Corrective Measures for Capital Deficiencies. The federal banking regulators are required to take “prompt corrective action” with respect to capital-deficient institutions. Agency regulations define, for each capital category, the levels at which institutions are “well-capitalized,” “adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized” and “critically undercapitalized.” A “well-capitalized” bank has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or higher; a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or higher; a leverage ratio of 5.0% or higher; and is not subject to any written agreement, order or directive requiring it to maintain a specific capital level for any capital measure. An “adequately capitalized” bank has a total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or higher; a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 4.0% or higher; a leverage ratio of 4.0% or higher (3.0% or higher if the bank was rated a composite 1 in its most recent examination report and is not experiencing significant growth); and does not meet the criteria for a well-capitalized bank. A bank is “undercapitalized” if it fails to meet any one of the “adequately capitalized” ratios.
In addition to requiring undercapitalized institutions to submit a capital restoration plan, agency regulations contain broad restrictions on certain activities of undercapitalized institutions including asset growth, acquisitions, branch establishment and expansion into new lines of business. With certain exceptions, an insured depository institution is prohibited from making capital distributions, including dividends, and is prohibited from paying

13


management fees to control persons if the institution would be undercapitalized after any such distribution or payment.
As an institution’s capital decreases, the FDIC’s enforcement powers become more severe. A significantly undercapitalized institution is subject to mandated capital raising activities, restrictions on interest rates paid and transactions with affiliates, removal of management and other restrictions. The FDIC has only very limited discretion in dealing with a critically undercapitalized institution and is virtually required to appoint a receiver or conservator.
Banks with risk-based capital and leverage ratios below the required minimums may also be subject to certain administrative actions, including the termination of deposit insurance upon notice and hearing, or a temporary suspension of insurance without a hearing in the event the institution has no tangible capital.
Deposit Insurance Assessments.The Bank mustFDIC maintains the DIF by assessing depository institutions an insurance premium on a quarterly basis. The amount of the assessment is a function of the institution’s risk category, of which there are four, and assessment base. An institution’s risk category is determined according to its supervisory ratings and capital levels and is used to determine the institution’s assessment rate. The assessment rate for risk categories are calculated according to a formula, which relies on supervisory ratings and either certain financial ratios or long-term debt ratings. An insured bank’s assessment base is determined by the balance of its insured deposits. Because the system is risk-based, it allows banks to pay lower assessments to the FDIC for federal deposit insurance protection that was impacted by legislation enacted during 2006. The Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005as their capital level and supervisory ratings improve. By the same token, if these indicators deteriorate, the institution will have to pay higher assessments to the FDIC.
Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Conforming Amendment Act, of 2005 were signed into law in 2006 (collectively the “Reform Act”) providingFDIC Board has the following changes:
Merged the Bank Insurance Fund (“BIF”) and the Savings Association Insurance Fund (“SAIF”) into a new fund, the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”).
Increased the coverage limit for retirement accounts to $250,000.
Indexed the coverage limit for deposit insurance for inflation.
Establishing a range of 1.15 percent to 1.50 percent within which the FDIC may set the Designated Reserve Ratio (“DRR”).
Eliminating the restrictions on premium rates based on the DRR and granting the FDIC the discretion to price deposit insurance according to risk for all insured institutions regardlessauthority to set the annual assessment rate range for the various risk categories within certain regulatory limits and to impose special assessments upon insured depository institutions when deemed necessary by the FDIC’s Board. As part of the level of the reserve ratio.
Granting a one-time initial assessment credit to recognize institutions’ past contributions to the fund.
The Deposit Insurance Fund ActRestoration Plan adopted by the FDIC in October 2008, on February 27, 2009, the FDIC adopted the final rule modifying the risk-based assessment system, which set initial base assessment rates between 12 and 45 basis points, beginning April 1, 2009. The FDIC imposed an emergency special assessment on June 30, 2009, which totaled $923 thousand and was collected in September 2009. In addition, in September 2009, the FDIC extended the Restoration Plan period to eight years. On November 12, 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule requiring prepayment of 1996 contained13 quarters of FDIC premiums. The Bank’s required prepayment amounted to $9.9 million and was collected in December 2009.
DIF-insured institutions pay a comprehensive approach to recapitalizing the Savings Association Insurance Fund and to assuring the payment of the Financing Corporation’sCorporation (“FICO”) bond obligations. Under this law, banks insured under the Bank Insurance Fund are requiredassessment in order to pay a portion offund the interest due on bonds that were issued byin the 1980s in connection with the failures in the thrift industry. For the fourth quarter of 2009, the FICO assessment is equal to 1.06 basis points for each $100 in 1987 to help shore updomestic deposits. These assessments will continue until the ailing Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation.bonds mature in 2019. The FDIC bills and collects this assessment on behalf of FICO.
Prior toEnforcement Powers.The FDIC, the Company’s restructuring in December 2005, the Company’s former bank subsidiaries NBG and BNB were operating under formal agreements with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”), which resulted in a higher FDIC risk classificationNYSBD and the Company experienced an increase in FDICFRB have broad enforcement powers, including the power to terminate deposit insurance, premiums in 2005. Asimpose substantial fines and other civil and criminal penalties and appoint a result of the merger of the Company’s subsidiary banksconservator or receiver. Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and the lower risk classification for FSB, the FDIC insurance premiums decreased in 2006. As a result of the Reform Act previously described,supervisory agreements could subject the Company has a $1.3 million assessment credit availableor the Bank, as well as the officers, directors and other institution-affiliated parties of these organizations, to offset future FDIC premium assessments, but not the FICO assessment. Therefore, the Company expects the Reform Act to have minimal impact on its 2007 consolidated results of operations.administrative sanctions and potentially substantial civil money penalties.
Federal Home Loan Bank System.FSB is a member of the FHLB System, which consists of 12 regional Federal Home Loan Banks.branches. The FHLB System provides a central credit facility primarily for member institutions. As members of the FHLB of New York (“FHLBNY”), the Bank is required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in the FHLB. The minimum investment requirement is determined by a “membership” investment component and an “activity-based” investment component. Under the “membership” component, a certain minimum investment in capital stock is required to be maintained as long as the institution remains a member of the FHLB. Under the “activity-based” component, members are required to purchase capital stock in proportion to the volume of certain transactions with the FLHB. As of December 31, 2006,2009, FSB complied with these requirements.
Enforcement Powers. The FDIC, the New York State Banking Department and the FRB have broad enforcement powers, including the power to terminate deposit insurance, impose substantial fines and other civil and criminal

14

- 13 -


penalties and appoint a conservator or receiver. Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and supervisory agreements could subject the Company or the Bank, as well as the officers, directors and other institution-affiliated parties of these organizations, to administrative sanctions and potentially substantial civil money penalties.
Brokered Deposit Restrictions. Adequately capitalized institutions cannot accept, renew or roll over brokered deposits except with a waiver from the FDIC, and are subject to restrictions on the interest rates that can be paid on such deposits. Undercapitalized institutions may not accept, renew or roll over brokered deposits.
Cross-Guarantee Provisions. The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 (“FIRREA”) contains a “cross-guarantee” provision which generally makes commonly controlled insured depository institutions liable to the FDIC for any losses incurred in connection with the failure of a commonly controlled depository institution.
Community Reinvestment Act.The Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (“CRA”) and the regulations issued hereunder are intended to encourage banks to help meet the credit needs of their service area, including low and moderate income neighborhoods, consistent with the safe and sound operations of the banks. These regulations also provide for regulatory assessment of a bank’s record in meeting the needs of its service area when considering applications regarding establishing branches, mergers or other bank or branch acquisitions. FIRREAThe Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 requires federal banking agencies to make public a rating of a bank’s performance under the CRA. In the case of a bank holding company, the CRA performance record of the banks involved in the transaction are reviewed in connection with the filing of an application to acquire ownership or control of shares or assets of a bank or to merge with any other bank holding company. An unsatisfactory record can substantially delay or block the transaction. FSB received a rating of “outstanding” as of its most recent CRA performance evaluation.
Consumer Laws and RegulationsRegulations.. In addition to the laws and regulations discussed herein, the Bank is also subject to certain consumer laws and regulations that are designed to protect consumers in transactions with banks. While the list set forth herein is not exhaustive, these laws and regulations include, among others, the Truth in Lending Act, the Truth in Savings Act, the Electronic Funds Transfer Act, the Expedited Funds Availability Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. These laws and regulations mandate certain disclosure requirements and regulate the manner in which financial institutions must deal with customers when taking deposits or making loans to such customers. The Bank must comply with the applicable provisions of these consumer protection laws and regulations as part of their ongoing customer relations. The Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (“Check 21 Act” or “the Act”), which became effective on October 28, 2004, creates a new negotiable instrument, called a “substitute check”, which banks are required to accept as the legal equivalent of a paper check if it meets the requirements of the Act. The Act is designed to facilitate check truncation, to foster innovation in the check payment system, and to improve the payment system by shortening processing times and reducing the volume of paper checks.
Changing Regulatory Structure
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (“Gramm-Leach”) was signed into law on November 12, 1999. Gramm-Leach permits, subject to certain conditions, combinations among banks, securities firms and insurance companies. Under Gramm-Leach, bank holding companies are permitted to offer their customers virtually any type of financial service including banking, securities underwriting, insurance (both underwriting and agency), and merchant banking. In order to engage in these additional financial activities, a bank holding company must qualify and register with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System as a “financial holding company” by demonstrating that each of its subsidiaries is “well capitalized,” “well managed,” and has at least a “satisfactory” rating under the CRA. On May 12, 2000,During the second quarter of 2008, FII received FRB approval from the Federal Reserve Bank of New Yorkfor an election to becomere-instate its status as a financial holding company, resulting inwhich the eventual formation of Five Star Investment Services, Inc. (“FSIS”) (formerly known as The FI Group, Inc. (“FIGI”)). During 2003, FIICompany terminated its financial holding company status and now operates as a bank holding company.during 2003. The change in status did not affect the non-financial subsidiaries or activities being conducted by the Company although future acquisitions or expansions of non-financial activities may require prior FRB approval and will be limited to those that are

15


permissible for bank holding companies.its subsidiaries. Gramm-Leach establishes that the federal banking agencies will regulate the banking activities of financial holding companies and banks’ financial subsidiaries, the SEC will regulate their securities activities and state insurance regulators will regulate their insurance activities. Gramm-Leach also provides new protections against the transfer and use by financial institutions of consumers’ nonpublic, personal information.
The major provisions of Gramm-Leach are:include:
Financial Holding Companies and Financial ActivitiesActivities.. Title I establishes a comprehensive framework to permit affiliations among commercial banks, insurance companies, securities firms, and other financial service providers by revising and expanding the Bank Holding Company Act framework to permit a holding company system to engage in a full range of financial activities through qualification as a new entity known as a financial holding company. A bank holding company that qualifies as a financial holding company can expand into a wide variety of services that are financial in nature, if its subsidiary depository institutions are “well-managed”, “well-capitalized” and have received at least a “satisfactory” rating on their last CRA examination. Services that have been deemed to be financial in nature include securities underwriting, dealing and market making, sponsoring mutual funds and investment companies, insurance underwriting and agency activities and merchant banking.
Securities ActivitiesActivities.. Title II narrows the exemptions from the securities laws previously enjoyed by banks, requires the FRB and the SEC to work together to draft rules governing certain securities activities of banks and creates a new, voluntary investment bank holding company.
Insurance ActivitiesActivities.. Title III restates the proposition that the states are the functional regulators for all insurance activities, including the insurance activities of federally chartered banks, and bars the states from prohibiting insurance activities by depository institutions. The law encourages the states to develop uniform or reciprocal rules for the licensing of insurance agents.

- 14 -


PrivacyPrivacy.. Under Title V, federal banking regulators were required to adopt rules that have limited the ability of banks and other financial institutions to disclose non-public information about consumers to nonaffiliated third parties. These limitations require disclosure of privacy policies to consumers and, in some circumstances, allow consumers to prevent disclosure of certain personal information to a nonaffiliated third party. Federal banking regulators issued final rules on May 10, 2000 to implement the privacy provisions of Title V. Under the rules, financial institutions must provide:
Initial notices to customers about their privacy policies, describing the conditions under which they may disclose nonpublic personal information to nonaffiliated third parties and affiliates;
Annual notices of their privacy policies to current customers; and
A reasonable method for customers to “opt out” of disclosures to nonaffiliated third parties.
Initial notices to customers about their privacy policies, describing the conditions under which they may disclose nonpublic personal information to nonaffiliated third parties and affiliates;
Compliance with the rules is mandatory after July 1, 2001.
Annual notices of their privacy policies to current customers; and
A reasonable method for customers to “opt out” of disclosures to nonaffiliated third parties.
The Bank wasis in full compliance with the rules as of or prior to the respective effective dates.rules.
Safeguarding Confidential Customer InformationInformation.. Under Title V, federal banking regulators are required to adopt rules requiring financial institutions to implement a program to protect confidential customer information. In January 2000, the federal banking agencies adopted guidelines requiring financial institutions to establish an information security program to:
Identify and assess the risks that may threaten customer information;
Develop a written plan containing policies and procedures to manage and control these risks;
Implement and test the plan; and
Adjust the plan on a continuing basis to account for changes in technology, the sensitivity of customer information and internal or external threats to information security.
Identify and assess the risks that may threaten customer information;
Develop a written plan containing policies and procedures to manage and control these risks;
Implement and test the plan; and
Adjust the plan on a continuing basis to account for changes in technology, the sensitivity of customer information and internal or external threats to information security.
The Bank approved security programs appropriate to its size and complexity and the nature and scope of its operations prior to the July 1, 2001 effective date of the regulatory guidelines. The implementation of the programs is an ongoing process.

16


Community Reinvestment Act Sunshine Requirements. In February 2001, the federal banking agencies adopted final regulations implementing Section 711 of Title VII, the CRA Sunshine Requirements. The regulations require nongovernmental entities or persons and insured depository institutions and affiliates that are parties to written agreements made in connection with the fulfillment of the institution’s CRA obligations to make available to the public and the federal banking agencies a copy of each agreement. The regulations impose annual reporting requirements concerning the disbursement, receipt and use of funds or other resources under these agreements. The effective date of the regulations was April 1, 2001. Neither FII nor the Bank is a party to any agreement that would be the subject of reporting pursuant to the CRA Sunshine Requirements.
USA Patriot Act
As part of the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (“USA Patriot Act”), signed into law on October 26, 2001, Congress adopted the International Money Laundering Abatement and Financial Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001 (“IMLAFATA”AML”). IMLAFATAAML authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the heads of other government agencies, to adopt special measures applicable to banks, bank holding companies or other financial institutions. During 2002, the Department of Treasury issued a number of regulations relating to enhanced recordkeeping and reporting requirements for certain financial transactions that are of primary money laundering concern, due diligence requirements concerning the beneficial ownership of certain types of accounts, and restrictions or prohibitions on certain types of accounts with foreign financial institutions. Covered financial institutions also are barred from dealing with foreign “shell” banks. In addition, IMLAFATAAML expands the circumstances under which funds in a bank account may be forfeited and requires covered financial institutions to respond under certain circumstances to requests for information from federal banking agencies within 120 hours.
Regulations were also adopted during 2002 to implement minimum standards to verify customer identity, to encourage cooperation among financial institutions, federal banking agencies, and law enforcement authorities regarding possible money laundering or terrorist activities, to prohibit the anonymous use of “concentration accounts,” and to require all covered financial institutions to have in place a Bank Secrecy Act compliance program. IMLAFATAAML also amends the Bank Holding Company Act and the Bank Merger Act to require the federal banking agencies to consider the effectiveness of a financial institution’s anti-money laundering activities when reviewing an application under these acts.
The Bank has in place a Bank Secrecy Act compliance program, and it engages in very few transactions of any kind with foreign financial institutions or foreign persons.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
On July 30, 2002, the President signed into law the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Act”) implementing legislative reforms intended to address corporate and accounting fraud. In addition to the establishment of a new accounting oversight board that enforces auditing, quality control and independence standards and is funded by fees from all publicly traded companies, the law restricts accounting firms from providing both auditing and consulting services to the same client. To ensure auditor independence, any non-audit services being provided to an audit client requires pre-approval by the issuer’s audit committee members. In addition, the audit partners must be rotated. The Act requires chief executive officers and chief financial officers, or their equivalent, to certify to the accuracy of periodic reports filed with the SEC, subject to civil and criminal penalties if they knowingly or willfully violate this certification requirement. In addition, under the Act, legal counsel is required to report evidence of a material violation of the securities laws or a breach of fiduciary duty by a company to its chief executive officer or its chief legal officer, and, if such officer does not appropriately respond, to report such evidence to the audit committee or other similar committee of the board of directors or the board itself.

- 15 -


Longer prison terms and increased penalties are also applied to corporate executives who violate federal securities laws, the period during which certain types of suits can be brought against a company or its officers has been extended, and bonuses issued to top executives prior to restatement of a company’s financial statements are subject to disgorgement if such restatement was due to corporate misconduct. Executives are also prohibited from insider trading during retirement plan “blackout” periods, and loans to company executives are restricted. The

17


Act accelerates the time frame for disclosures by public companies, as they must immediately disclose any material changes in their financial condition or operations. Directors and executive officers must also provide information for most changes in ownership in a company’s securities within two business days of the change.
The Act also prohibits any officer or director of a company or any other person acting under their direction from taking any action to fraudulently influence, coerce, manipulate or mislead any independent public or certified accountant engaged in the audit of the company’s financial statements for the purpose of rendering the financial statement’s materially misleading. The Act also requires the SEC to prescribe rules requiring inclusion of an internal control report and assessment by management in the annual report to stockholders. In addition, the Act requires that each financial report required to be prepared in accordance with (or reconciled to) accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and filed with the SEC reflect all material correcting adjustments that are identified by a “registered public accounting firm” in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules and regulations of the SEC.
As directed by Section 302(a) of the Act, the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer are each required to certify that the Company’s quarterly and annual reports do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact. The Act imposes several requirements, including having these officers certify that: they are responsible for establishing, maintaining and regularly evaluating the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls; they have made certain disclosures to the Company’s auditors and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors about the Company’s internal controls; and they have included information in the Company’s quarterly and annual reports about their evaluation and whether there have been significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls during the last quarter.
Fair Credit Reporting Act and Fair and Accurate Transactions Act
In 1970, the U. S. Congress enacted the Fair Credit Reporting Act (the “FCRA”) in order to ensure the confidentiality, accuracy, relevancy and proper utilization of consumer credit report information. Under the framework of the FCRA, the United States has developed a highly advanced and efficient credit reporting system. The information contained in that broad system is used by financial institutions, retailers and other creditors of every size in making a wide variety of decisions regarding financial transactions. Employers and law enforcement agencies have also made wide use of the information collected and maintained in databases made possible by the FCRA. The FCRA affirmatively preempts state law in a number of areas, including the ability of entities affiliated by common ownership to share and exchange information freely, the requirements on credit bureaus to reinvestigate the contents of reports in response to consumer complaints, among others. By its terms, the preemption provisions of the FCRA were to terminate as of December 31, 2003. With the enactment of the Fair and Accurate Transactions Act (the “FACT Act”) in late 2003, the preemption provisions of FCRA were extended, although the FACT Act imposes additional requirements on entities that gather and share consumer credit information. The FACT Act required the FRB and the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) to issue final regulations within nine months of the effective date of the Act. A series of regulations and announcements have been promulgated, including a joint FTC/FRB announcement of effective dates for FCRA amendments, the FTC’s “Free Credit Report” rule, revisions to the FTC’s FACT Act Rules, the FTC’s final rules on identity theft and proof of identity, the FTC’s final regulation on consumer information and records disposal, the FTC’s final summaries and the final rule on prescreen notices.

18

- 16 -


FRB Final Rule on Trust Preferred SecuritiesEmergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008
On March 1, 2005,October 3, 2008, President Bush signed into law the FRB issued a final rule that allowsEmergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (“EESA”), giving the continued inclusion of trust preferred securitiesTreasury authority to take certain actions to restore liquidity and stability to the U.S. banking markets. Based upon its authority in the Tier 1 capitalEESA, a number of bank holding companies. Trust preferred securities, however, will be subjectprograms to stricter quantitative limits. Key components ofimplement EESA have been announced. Those programs include the final rule are:following:
  TrustCapital Purchase Program. Pursuant to this program, the Treasury, on behalf of the U.S. government, purchased preferred securities, togetherstock, along with other “restricted core capital elements”, can be included in awarrants to purchase common stock, from certain financial institutions, including bank holding company’s Tier 1 capital up to 25%companies, savings and loan holding companies and banks or savings associations not controlled by a holding company. The investment has a dividend rate of 5% per year, until the fifth anniversary of the sumTreasury’s investment and a dividend of core capital elements, including “restricted core capital elements”;9% thereafter.
 
  Restricted core capital elementsDuring the time the Treasury holds securities issued pursuant to this program, participating financial institutions are definedrequired to include:
Qualifying trust preferred securities;comply with certain provisions regarding executive compensation and corporate governance. Participation in this program also imposes certain restrictions upon an institution’s dividends to common shareholders and stock repurchase activities. As described further herein, we elected to participate in the CPP and received $37.5 million pursuant to the program.
 
  Qualifying cumulative perpetualWhile any senior preferred stock (and related surplus);
Minority interest related to qualifying cumulative perpetualis outstanding, we may pay dividends on our common stock, provided that all accrued and unpaid dividends for all past dividend periods on the senior preferred stock directly issued by a consolidated U.S. depository institution or foreign bank subsidiary; and
Minority interest relatedare fully paid. Prior to qualifying common or qualifying perpetualthe third anniversary of the UST’s purchase of the Senior Preferred Stock, unless the senior preferred stock issued by a consolidated subsidiary that is neither a U.S. depository institution nor a foreign bank subsidiary.has been redeemed or the UST has transferred all of the senior preferred stock to third parties, the consent of the UST will be required for us to increase our quarterly common stock dividend above $0.10 per share.
The sum of core capital elements will be calculated net of goodwill, less any associated deferred tax liability;
Internationally active bank holding companies are further limited, and must limit restricted core capital elements to 15% of the sum of core capital elements, including restricted core capital elements, net of goodwill, although they may include qualifying mandatory convertible preferred securities up to the 25% limit;
A five year transition period for application of quantitative limits, ending March 31, 2009.
Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. This program contained both (i) a debt guarantee component (“Debt Guarantee Program”), whereby the FDIC will guarantee until June 30, 2012, the senior unsecured debt issued by eligible financial institutions between October 14, 2008 and October 31, 2009 (although a limited, six-month emergency guarantee facility has been established by the FDIC whereby certain participating entities can apply to the FDIC for permission to issue FDIC-guaranteed debt during the period from October 31, 2009 through April 30, 2010); and (ii) a transaction account guarantee (“TAG”) component (“TAG Program”), whereby the FDIC will insure 100% of noninterest bearing deposit transaction accounts held at eligible financial institutions, such as payment processing accounts, payroll accounts and working capital accounts through December 31, 2009. The Company opted into the TAG Program but not the Debt Guarantee Program, which concluded on October 31, 2009. On August 26, 2009, the FDIC approved the final rule extending the TAG Program for six months until June 30, 2010, and increased the applicable TAG assessment fees during that six month period. The Company did not opt out of the TAG program extension, which is expected to increase future FDIC insurance costs.
Temporary increase in deposit insurance coverage. Pursuant to the EESA, the FDIC temporarily raised the basic limit on federal deposit insurance coverage from $100,000 to $250,000 per depositor. The EESA provides that the basic deposit insurance limit will return to $100,000 after December 31, 2009, but the temporary increase has been extended through December 31, 2013, and is permanent for certain retirement accounts (including IRAs).
Change in Tax Treatment of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Preferred Stock. Section 301 of the EESA changes the tax treatment of gains or losses from the sale or exchange of FNMA or FHLMC preferred stock by an “applicable financial institution,” such as FSB, by stating that a gain or loss on Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac preferred stock shall be treated as ordinary gain or loss instead of capital gain or loss, as was previously the case. This change, which was enacted in the 2008 fourth quarter, provides tax relief to banking organizations that have suffered losses on certain direct and indirect investments in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac preferred stock. As a result, the Company was able to recognize as an ordinary loss the other-than-temporary-impairment (“OTTI”) charge on its investment in auction rate preferred equity securities, which were collateralized by FNMA and FHLMC preferred stock, for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Expanding Enforcement AuthorityImpact of Inflation and Enforcement MattersChanging Prices
The FRB,Company’s financial statements included herein have been prepared in accordance with GAAP, which requires the New York State SuperintendentCompany to measure financial position and operating results principally using historic dollars. Changes in the relative value of Banksmoney due to inflation or recession are generally not considered. The primary effect of inflation on the operations of the Company is reflected in increased operating costs. In the Company’s view, changes in interest rates affect the financial condition of a financial institution to a far greater degree than changes in the inflation rate. While interest rates are generally influenced by changes in the inflation rate, they do not necessarily change at the same rate or in the same magnitude. Interest rates are sensitive to many factors that are beyond the control of the Company, including changes in the expected rate of inflation, general and local economic conditions and the FDIC possess extensive authority to police unsafe or unsound practicesmonetary and violationsfiscal policies of applicable lawsthe United States government, its agencies and regulations by depository institutionsvarious other governmental regulatory authorities.

- 17 -


Regulatory and their holding companies. For example, the FDIC may terminate the deposit insurance of any institution that it determines has engaged in an unsafe or unsound practice. The agencies can also assess civil money penalties, issue cease and desist or removal orders, seek injunctions, and publicly disclose such actions.
Effect On Economic EnvironmentPolicies
The Company’s business and earnings are affected by general and local economic conditions and by the monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, its agencies and various other governmental regulatory authorities, includingauthorities. The FRB regulates the supply of money in order to influence general economic conditions. Among the instruments of monetary policy of the FRB, have a significant effect on the operating results of bank holding companies and their subsidiaries. Among the means available to the FRB to affect the money supply are (i) conducting open market operations in U.S. Government securities, changes ingovernment obligations, (ii) changing the discount rate on member bankfinancial institution borrowings, and changes in(iii) imposing or changing reserve requirements against member bank deposits.financial institution deposits, and (iv) restricting certain borrowings and imposing or changing reserve requirements against certain borrowings by financial institutions and their affiliates. These meansmethods are used in varying degrees and combinations to influence overall growth and distributiondirectly affect the availability of bank loans investments and deposits, and their use may affectas well as the interest rates charged on loans orand paid foron deposits. For that reason, the policies of the FRB monetary policiescould have materially affecteda material effect on the operating resultsearnings of commercial banks in the pastCompany.
EMPLOYEES
At December 31, 2009, the Company had 513 full-time and 107 part-time employees. None of the employees are expectedsubject to continue to do so ina collective bargaining agreement and management believes its relations with employees are good.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF REGISTRANT
The following table sets forth current information regarding the future.Company’s executive officers and certain other significant employees (ages are as of the 2010 Annual Meeting).
           
      Starting  
Name Age In Positions/Offices
Peter G. Humphrey  55   1977  President and Chief Executive Officer of FII and Five Star Bank.
           
Karl F. Krebs  54   2009  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of FII and Five Star Bank. Senior Financial Specialist at West Valley Environmental Services, LLC prior to joining FII in 2009. President of Robar General Funding Corp. from 2006 to 2008. Senior Vice President and Line-of-Business Finance Director at Five Star Bank from 2005 to 2006 and Senior Vice President at Wyoming County Bank from 2004 to 2005.
           
Martin K. Birmingham  43   2005  Executive Vice President and Regional President / Commercial Banking Executive Officer of Five Star Bank. Senior Team Leader and Regional President of the Rochester Market at Bank of America (formally Fleet Boston Financial) from 2000 to 2005.
           
George D. Hagi  57   2006  Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer of FII and Five Star Bank. Senior Vice President and Director of Risk Management at First National Bankshares of Florida and FNB Corp. from 1997 to 2005.
           
Richard J. Harrison  64   2003  Executive Vice President and Senior Retail Lending Administrator of Five Star Bank. Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer at Savings Bank of the Finger Lakes from 2000 to 2003.
           
Kevin B. Klotzbach  57   2001  Senior Vice President and Treasurer of Five Star Bank.
           
R. Mitchell McLaughlin  52   1981  Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer of Five Star Bank.
           
Matthew T. Murtha  55   2000  Senior Vice President and Director of Sales and Marketing of Five Star Bank.
           
Bruce H. Nagle  61   2006  Senior Vice President and Director of Human Resources of FII and Five Star Bank. Vice President of Human Resources at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center from 2000 to 2006.
           
John L. Rizzo  60   2010  Senior Vice President and Corporate Secretary of FII and Five Star Bank. Counsel (in-house) for FII and Five Star Bank from 2007 to 2010. Genesee County (New York) Attorney from 1976 to 2010.
           
John J. Witkowski  47   2005  Executive Vice President and Regional President / Retail Banking Executive Officer of Five Star Bank. Senior Vice President and Director of Sales for Business Banking / Client Development Group at Bank of America from 1993 to 2005.

- 18 -


ItemITEM 1A. Risk FactorsRISK FACTORS
Our financial results are subject to a number of risks.Making or continuing an investment in securities issued by the Company, including its common stock, involves certain risks that you should carefully consider. The factors discussedrisks and uncertainties described below are intended to highlightnot the only risks that management believes are most relevant to our current operating environment. This listing is not intended to capture all risks associated with our business.may have a material adverse effect on the Company. Additional risks including those generally affectingand uncertainties also could adversely affect the industry in which we operate,Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. If any of the following risks that we currently deem immaterial and risks generally applicable to companies that have recently undertaken similar transactions, may also negatively impact our consolidatedactually occur, the Company’s business, financial position, consolidatedcondition or results of operations could be negatively affected, the market price for your securities could decline, and you could lose all or a part of your investment. Further, to the extent that any of the information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K constitutes forward-looking statements, the risk factors set forth below also are cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company.
The Company’s business may be adversely impacted by adverse conditions in the financial markets and economic conditions generally.
The capital and credit markets have been experiencing unprecedented levels of volatility and disruption for more than a year. In some cases, the markets have produced downward pressure on stock prices and credit availability for certain issuers without regard to those issuers’ underlying financial strength. As a consequence of the recession that the United States now finds itself in, business activity across a wide range of industries face serious difficulties due to the lack of consumer spending and the extreme lack of liquidity in the global credit markets. Unemployment has also increased significantly.
A sustained weakness or weakening in business and economic conditions generally or specifically in the principal markets in which the Company does business could have one or more of the following material adverse impacts on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations:
An impairment of securities in our investment portfolio;
A decrease in the demand for loans and other products and services offered by the Company;
A decrease in the value of our loans held for sale or other assets secured by consumer or commercial real estate;
An impairment of certain intangible assets, such as goodwill;
An increase in the number of clients and counterparties who become delinquent, file for protection under bankruptcy laws or default on their loans or other obligations to the Company. An increase in the number of delinquencies, bankruptcies or defaults could result in a higher level of non-performing assets, net charge-offs, provision for loan losses, and valuation adjustments on loans held for sale.
Current market developments may adversely impact the Company’s industry and business.
Dramatic declines in the housing market during the prior year, with falling home prices and increasing foreclosures and unemployment, have resulted in, and may continue to result in, significant write-downs of asset values by the Company and other financial institutions, including government-sponsored entities and major commercial and investment banks. These write-downs, initially of mortgage-backed securities but spreading to credit default swaps and other derivative securities, have caused many financial institutions to seek additional capital, to merge with larger and stronger institutions and, in some cases, to fail. Reflecting concern about the stability of the financial markets generally and the strength of counterparties, many lenders and institutional investors have reduced, and in some cases, ceased to provide funding to borrowers including financial institutions.
This market turmoil and tightening of credit have led to an increased level of commercial and consumer delinquencies, lack of consumer confidence, increased market volatility and widespread reduction of business activity generally. The resulting lack of available credit, lack of confidence in the financial sector, increased volatility in the financial markets and reduced business activity could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
Further negative market developments may affect consumer confidence levels and may cause adverse changes in payment patterns, causing increases in delinquencies and default rates, which may impact our charge-offs and provisions for credit losses. A worsening of these conditions would likely exacerbate the adverse effects of these difficult market conditions on the financial services industry and could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
The Company is subject to liquidity risks.
The Company maintains liquidity primarily through customer deposits and other funding sources. If economic influences change so that we do not have access to short-term credit, or our depositors withdraw a substantial amount of their funds for other uses, the Company might experience liquidity issues. Our efforts to monitor and manage liquidity risk may not be successful or sufficient to deal with dramatic or unanticipated reductions in our liquidity. In such events, our cost of funds may increase, thereby reducing our net interest revenue, or we may need to sell a portion of our investment and/or loan portfolio, which, depending upon market conditions, could result in our realizing a loss.

- 19 -


Asset Quality.A significant sourceThe soundness of riskother financial institutions, including the FHLB, could adversely impact the Company.
The Company’s ability to engage in routine funding transactions could be adversely affected by the actions and commercial soundness of other financial institutions. Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of counterparty relationships. The Company has exposure to many different industries and counterparties, and routinely executes transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry. An important counterparty for the Company, arises from the possibility that losses will be sustained because borrowers, guarantors and related parties may fail to perform in accordance with the terms of their loans. Most loans originated byliquidity, is the FHLBNY, which the Company uses as its primary source of long-term wholesale funding. At December 31, 2009, the Company had a total of $30.1 million in borrowed funds with FHLBNY.
There are secured, but loanstwelve regional branches of the FHLB, including FHLBNY. Several members have warned that they have either breached risk-based capital requirements or that they are close to breaching those requirements. To conserve capital, some FHLB branches are suspending dividends, cutting dividend payments, and not buying back excess FHLB stock that members hold. FHLBNY has stated that they expect to be able to continue to pay dividends, redeem excess capital stock, and provide competitively priced advances in the future. The most severe problems in the FHLB system have been at some of the other FHLB branches. Nonetheless, the twelve FHLB branches are jointly liable for the consolidated obligations of the FHLB system. To the extent that one FHLB branch cannot meet its obligations to pay its share of debt, other FHLB branches may be unsecured depending oncalled upon to make the naturepayment.
As a member of the loan. With respectFHLB system, the Company is required to secured loans,hold stock in FHLBNY. The carrying value and fair value of the collateral securingCompany’s FHLBNY common stock as of December 31, 2009 was $3.3 million based on its par value. In an extreme situation, it is possible that the repaymentcapitalization of these loans includesan FHLB, including FHLBNY, could be substantially diminished or reduced to zero. Consequently, given that there is no market for the Company’s FHLBNY common stock, there is a wide variety of diverse real and personal propertyrisk that maythe investment could be affected by changes in prevailing economic, environmental and other conditions, including declinesdetermined to be impaired in the valuefuture.
Deterioration in the soundness of real estate, changes in interest rates, changes in monetary and fiscal policies ofFHLBNY or the federal government, wide-spread disease, terrorist activity, environmental contamination and other external events.
The Company has adopted loan policies with well-defined risk tolerance limits including individual loan officer and committee approval processes. Policies and procedures outline underwriting standards, appraisal requirements, collateral valuations, financial information reviews, and ongoing quality monitoring processes that management believes are appropriate to mitigate the risk of loss within the loan portfolio. Such policies and procedures, however, may not prevent unexpected losses thatFHLB system could have a material adverse effectimpact on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
Interest Rate RiskThe Company’s municipal bond portfolio may be adversely affected by the political, economic and legislative environment in New York State.
Approximately 20% of our investment securities portfolio at December 31, 2009, is comprised of municipal securities issued by or on behalf of New York and its political subdivisions, agencies or instrumentalities, the interest on which is exempt from regular federal income tax. Risks associated with investing in municipal securities include political, economic and regulatory factors which may affect the issuers.
In response to the current national economic downturn, governmental cost burdens may be reallocated among federal, state and local governments. In addition, laws enacted in the future by Congress or state legislatures or referenda could extend the time for payment of principal and/or interest, or impose other constraints on enforcement of such obligations, or on the ability of municipalities to levy taxes. Other factors including national economic, social and environmental policies and conditions, which are not within the control of the issuers of the bonds, could affect or have an adverse impact on the financial condition of the issuers. Issuers of municipal securities might seek protection under the bankruptcy laws. Investments in municipal securities are subject to the risk that the issuer could default on its obligations. Such a default could result from the inadequacy of the sources of revenues from which interest and principal payments are to be made or the assets collateralizing such obligations.
The current fiscal situation in New York may lead nationally recognized rating agencies to downgrade its debt obligations. It is uncertain how the financial markets may react to any potential future ratings downgrade in New York’s debt obligations. However, the fallout from the recent budgetary crisis and a possible ratings downgrade could adversely affect the value of New York’s obligations, which could result in a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
.The value of certain securities in the Company’s investment securities portfolio may be negatively affected by disruptions in the market for these securities.
In addition to interest rate risk typically associated with an investment portfolio, the market for certain investment securities held within the Company’s investment portfolio has, over the past year, become much less liquid. This coupled with uncertainty surrounding the credit risk associated with the underlying collateral has caused material discrepancies in valuation estimates obtained from third parties. The Company values some of its investments using internally developed cash flow and valuation models, which include certain subjective estimates which are believed to reflect the estimates a purchaser of such securities would use if such a transaction were to occur. The volatile market may affect the value of these securities, such as through reduced valuations due to the perception of heightened credit and liquidity risks, in addition to interest rate risk typically associated with these securities. There can be no assurance that the declines in market value associated with these disruptions will not result in impairments of these assets, which could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

- 20 -


The limitations on incentive compensation contained in the ARRA may adversely affect the Company’s ability to retain its highest performing employees.
The limitations placed on incentive compensation in the interim final TARP regulations issued under the ARRA have created restrictions on the amount and form of incentive compensation that may impact negatively the Company’s ability to create a compensation structure that permits it to retain its highest performing employees.
Participants in the CPP are subject to certain restrictions on dividends, repurchases of common stock and executive compensation.
The Company is subject to restrictions on dividends, repurchases of common stock, and executive compensation. Compliance with these restrictions and other restrictions may increase the Company’s costs and limit its ability to pursue business opportunities. Additionally, any reduction of, or the elimination of, the Company’s common stock dividend in the future could adversely affect the market price of the Company’s common stock. The current restrictions, as well as any possible future restrictions, associated with participation in the CPP could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations.
Negative perceptions associated with our continued participation in the Treasury’s TARP may adversely affect our ability to retain customers, attract investors, and compete for new business opportunities.
Several financial institutions which also participated in the CPP have repurchased their TARP preferred stock. There can be no assurance as to the timing or manner in which the Company may repurchase its TARP preferred stock from the Treasury. Our customers, employees and counterparties in our current and future business relationships could draw negative implications regarding the strength of the Company as a financial institution based on our continued participation in the TARP following the exit of one or more of our competitors or other financial institutions. Any such negative perceptions could impair our ability to effectively compete with other financial institutions for business or to retain high performing employees. If this were to occur, the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations may be adversely affected, perhaps materially.
The Company has not yet attempted to obtain permission to repay TARP funds.
In order to repay the TARP funds we received, we must first receive approval from our primary federal regulator who will then forward our application to the Treasury. To date, we have not attempted to obtain the necessary governmental approval to repay such funds. Until we repay our TARP funds, we will continue to be subject to the constraints imposed on us by the federal government in connection with such funds.
FDIC insurance premiums may increase materially.
During 2008 and continuing in 2009, higher levels of bank failures have dramatically increased resolution costs of the FDIC, and depleted the DIF. In addition, the FDIC and the U.S. Congress have taken action to increase federal deposit insurance coverage, placing additional stress on the DIF. In order to maintain a strong funding position and restore reserve ratios of the DIF, the FDIC increased assessment rates of insured institutions uniformly by seven cents for every $100 of deposits beginning with the first quarter of 2009, with additional changes beginning April 1, 2009, which require riskier institutions to pay a larger share of premiums by factoring in rate adjustments based on secured liabilities and unsecured debt levels. To further support the rebuilding of the DIF, the FDIC imposed a special assessment on each insured institution, equal to five basis points of the institution’s total assets minus Tier 1 capital as of September 30, 2009. For our Bank, there was a charge of $923 thousand, which was recorded during the second quarter of 2009. The FDIC has indicated that future special assessments are possible, although it has not determined the magnitude or timing of any future assessments. In December 2009, we paid a pre-payment of the FDIC’s estimated assessment total for the next three years for our Bank, totaling approximately $9.9 million. This amount was included in Other Assets in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2009, and will be amortized, subject to adjustments imposed by the FDIC, over the next three years.
We are generally unable to control the amount of premiums that we are required to pay for FDIC insurance. If there are additional bank or financial institution failures, we may be required to pay even higher FDIC premiums. Our expenses for 2009 were significantly and adversely affected by the increased premiums and the special assessment. These increases and assessment and any future increases in insurance premiums or additional special assessments could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
The Company may need to raise additional capital in the future and such capital may not be available when needed or at all.
The Company may need to raise additional capital in the future to provide sufficient capital resources and liquidity to meet the Company’s commitments and business needs. The Company’s ability to raise additional capital, if needed, will depend on, among other things, conditions in the capital markets at that time, which are outside of the Company’s control, and its financial performance.
The Company cannot assure that such capital will be available to it on acceptable terms or at all. Any occurrence that may limit the Company’s access to the capital markets, such as a decline in the confidence of debt purchasers, depositors of FSB or counterparties participating in the capital markets, or a downgrade of the Company’s debt rating, may adversely affect the Company’s capital costs and ability to raise capital and, in turn, its liquidity. An inability to raise additional capital on acceptable terms when needed could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

- 21 -


FII is a financial holding company and is dependent on its banking subsidiary for dividends, distributions and other payments.
The parent company, FII, is a legal entity separate and distinct from its banking and other subsidiaries. FII’s principal source of cash flow, including cash flow to pay dividends to its shareholders and principal and interest on its outstanding debt, is dividends from FSB. There are statutory and regulatory limitations on the payment of dividends by FSB to the parent company, as well as by FII to its shareholders. Regulations of both the Federal Reserve and the State of New York affect the ability of FSB to pay dividends and other distributions, as well as make loans to FII. The Bank is currently required to obtain approval from the NYS Banking Department for dividend payments. If FSB is unable to make dividend payments to FII and sufficient capital is not otherwise available, FII may not be able to make dividend payments to its common shareholders or principal and interest payments on its outstanding debt. See also the section titled “Supervision and Regulation—Restrictions on Distribution of Subsidiary Bank Dividends and Assets” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Future issuances of additional securities could result in dilution of your ownership.
The Company may determine from time to time to issue additional securities to raise additional capital, support growth, or to make acquisitions. In July 2009, the Company filed a Form S-3 registration statement for issuance of up to $50 million of common stock, where proceeds from an offering would be used for general corporate purposes. Further, the Company may issue stock options or other stock grants to retain and motivate its employees. These issuances of the Company’s securities may dilute the ownership interests of existing shareholders.
The Company may not pay dividends on its common stock.
Shareholders of the Company’s common stock are only entitled to receive such dividends as the Company’s Board of Directors may declare out of funds legally available for such payments. Although the Company has historically declared cash dividends on its common stock, it is not required to do so and may reduce or eliminate its common stock dividend in the future. This could adversely affect the market price of the Company’s common stock. Also, participation in the CPP limits our ability to increase our dividend or to repurchase our common stock, for so long as any securities issued under such program remain outstanding, as discussed in greater detail below.
If the Company experiences greater credit losses than anticipated, earnings may be adversely impacted.
As a lender, the Company is exposed to the risk that its customers will be unable to repay their loans according to their terms and that any collateral securing the payment of their loans may not be sufficient to assure repayment. Credit losses are inherent in the business of making loans and could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s results of operations.
The Company makes various assumptions and judgments about the collectibility of its loan portfolio, including the creditworthiness of its borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets serving as collateral, and provides an allowance for estimated loan losses based on a number of factors. The Company believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate. However, if the Company’s assumptions or judgments are wrong, its allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to cover its actual credit losses. The Company may have to increase the allowance in the future in response to the request of one of its primary banking regulators, to adjust for changing conditions and assumptions, or as a result of any deterioration in the quality of its loan portfolio. The actual amount of future provisions for credit losses may vary from the amount of past provisions.
Geographic concentration in one market may unfavorably impact the Company’s operations.
Substantially all of the Company’s business and operations are concentrated in the Western and Central New York region. As a result of this geographic concentration, the Company’s results depend largely on economic conditions in these and surrounding areas. Deterioration in economic conditions in this market could:
increase loan delinquencies;
increase problem assets and foreclosures;
increase claims and lawsuits;
decrease the demand for our products and services; and
decrease the value of collateral for loans, especially real estate, in turn reducing customers’ borrowing power, the value of assets associated with non-performing loans and collateral coverage.
Generally, the Company makes loans to small to mid-sized businesses whose success depends on the regional economy. These businesses generally have fewer financial resources in terms of capital or borrowing capacity than larger entities. Adverse economic and business conditions in these market areas could reduce the Company’s growth rate, affect our borrowers’ ability to repay their loans and, consequently, adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and performance. For example, the Company places substantial reliance on real estate as collateral for its loan portfolio. A sharp downturn in real estate values in our market area could leave many of these loans inadequately collateralized. If the Company is required to liquidate the collateral securing a loan to satisfy the debt during a period of reduced real estate values, the impact on the Company’s results of operations could be materially adverse. See also the section titled “Market Area and Competition” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

- 22 -


The market price of shares of the Company’s common stock may fluctuate.
The market price of the Company’s common stock could be subject to significant fluctuations due to a change in sentiment in the market regarding the Company’s operations or business prospects. Such risks may be affected by:
Operating results that vary from the expectations of management, securities analysts and investors;
Developments in the Company’s business or in the financial sector generally;
Regulatory changes affecting the financial services industry generally or the Company’s business and operations;
The operating and securities price performance of companies that investors consider to be comparable to the Company;
Announcements of strategic developments, acquisitions and other material events by the Company or its competitors;
Changes in the credit, mortgage and real estate markets, including the markets for mortgage-related securities; and
Changes in global financial markets and global economies and general market conditions, such as interest or foreign exchange rates, stock, commodity, credit or asset valuations or volatility.
Stock markets in general and the Company’s common stock in particular have, over the past year, and continue to be experiencing significant price and volume volatility. As a result, the market price of the Company’s common stock may continue to be subject to similar market fluctuations that may be unrelated to its operating performance or prospects. Increased volatility could result in a decline in the market price of the Company’s common stock and may make it more difficult for shareholders to liquidate the common stock.
The Company’s market value could result in an impairment of goodwill.
The Company’s goodwill is evaluated for impairment on an annual basis or when triggering events or circumstances indicate impairment may exist. Significant and sustained declines in the Company’s stock price and market capitalization, significant declines in the Company’s expected future cash flows, significant adverse changes in the business climate or slower growth rates could result in impairment of goodwill. If impairment of goodwill was determined to exist, the Company would be required to write down its goodwill as a charge to earnings, which could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition. For further discussion, see Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, and Note 6, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Changes in interest rates could adversely impact the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.
The banking industry’s earnings depend largely on the relationship between the yield on earning assets, primarily loans and investments, and the cost of funds, primarily deposits and borrowings. This relationship, known as the interest rate spread, is subject to fluctuation and is affected by economic and competitive factors which influence interest rates, the volume and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the level of non-performing assets. Fluctuations in interest rates affect the demand of customers for the Company’s products and services. The Bank is subject to interest rate risk to the degree that interest-bearing liabilities re-price or mature more slowly or more rapidly or on a different basis than interest-earning assets. Significant fluctuations in interest rates could have a material adverse effectimpact on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. For additional information regarding interest rate risk, see Part II, Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”Risk” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ChangesIndustry competition may have an adverse impact on the Company’s success.
The Company’s profitability depends on its ability to compete successfully. The Company operates in a highly competitive environment where certain of its competitors are larger and have more resources. In the Company’s market areas, it faces competition from commercial banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, internet banks, finance companies, insurance companies, brokerage and investment banking firms, and other financial intermediaries that offer similar services. Some of the Company’s non-bank competitors are not subject to the same extensive regulations that govern FII or FSB and may have greater flexibility in competing for business. The Company expects competition to intensify among financial services companies due to the recent consolidation of certain competing financial institutions and the conversion of certain investment banks to bank holding companies. Should competition in the Valuefinancial services industry intensify, the Company’s ability to market its products and services may be adversely impacted.

- 23 -


The Company’s deferred tax assets may not ultimately be realized or its tax positions may be subject to challenge by the IRS.
The Company’s deferred tax assets may provide significant future tax savings to the Company. The Company’s use of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.Under accounting standards,these deferred tax benefits may depend on a number of factors including the ability of the Company is not required to amortize goodwill but rather must evaluate goodwill for impairment at least annually. If deemed impaired at any pointgenerate significant taxable income; the absence of a future ownership change of the Company that could limit or eliminate the tax benefits; the acceptance by the taxing authorities of the positions taken on the Company’s tax returns as to the amount and timing of its income and expenses; and future changes in laws or regulations relating to tax deductions and net operating losses.
The Company assesses the future, an impairment charge representing all or a portion of goodwilllikelihood that deferred tax assets will be recordedrealizable based on future taxable income and, if necessary, establishes a valuation allowance for those deferred tax assets determined to current earningsnot likely be realizable. Management judgment is required in determining the periodappropriate recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities, including projections of future taxable income. There can be no absolute assurance, however, that the net deferred assets will ultimately be realized.
The Company’s information systems may experience an interruption or breach in which the impairment occurred. The capitalized value of other intangible assets is amortized to earnings over their estimated lives. Other intangible assets are also subject to periodic impairment reviews. If these assets are deemed impaired at any point in the future, an impairment charge will be recorded to current earnings in the period in which the impairment occurred. See also Note 7 of the notes to consolidated financial statements.security.
Breach of Information Security and Technology Dependence.The Company depends upon data processing, software, communication and information exchange on a variety of computing platforms and networks and over the internet. Despite instituted safeguards, the Company cannot be certain that all of its systems are entirely free from vulnerability to attack or other technological difficulties or failures. The Company relies on the services of a variety of vendors to meet its data processing and communication needs. If information security is breached or other technology difficulties or failures occur, information may be lost or misappropriated, services and operations may be interrupted and the Company could be exposed to claims from customers. Any of these results could have a material adverse effectimpact on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
Economic Conditions, Limited Geographic Diversification.The Company’s banking operations are located in Western and Central New York State. Because of the geographic concentration of its operations, the Company’s results depend largely upon economic conditions in this area, which include volatility in wholesale milk prices, losses of manufacturing jobs in Rochester and Buffalo, and minimal population growth throughout the region. Further deterioration in economic conditions could adversely affect the quality of the Company’s loan portfolio and the demand for its products and services, and accordingly, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. See also the section titled “Market Area and Competition”.

20


Ability of the Company to Execute Its Business Strategy.The financial performance and profitability of the Company will depend on its ability to execute its strategic plan and manage its future growth. Failure to execute these plans could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Moreover, the Company’s future performance is subject to a number of factors beyond its control, including pending and future federal and state banking legislation, regulatory changes, unforeseen litigation outcomes, inflation, lending and deposit rate changes, interest rate fluctuations, increased competition and economic conditions. Accordingly, these issues could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
Dependence on Key Personnel.The Company’s success depends to a significant extent on the management skills of its existing executive officers and directors, many of whom have held officer and director positions with the Company for many years. The loss or unavailability of any of its key personnel, including Erland E. Kailbourne, Chairman of the Board of Directors, Peter G. Humphrey, President and Chief Executive Officer, James T. Rudgers, Executive Vice President and Chief of Community Banking, Ronald A. Miller, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, George D. Hagi, Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer, John J. Witkowski, Senior Vice President and Regional President/Retail Banking Executive, Martin K. Birmingham, Senior Vice President and Regional President/Commercial Market Executive, Kevin B. Klotzbach, Senior Vice President and Treasurer, Bruce H. Nagle, Senior Vice President and Director of Human Resources and Richard J. Harrison, Senior Vice President and Senior Retail Lending Administrator, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. See also Part III, Item 10, “Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.”
Competition.National competitors are much larger in total assets and capitalization, have greater access to capital markets and offer a broader array of financial services than the Company. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to compete effectively in its markets. Furthermore, developments increasing the nature or level of competition, together with changes in our strategic plan and stricter loan underwriting standards, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. See also the sections titled “Market Area and Competition” and “Supervision and Regulation.”
Government Regulation and Monetary Policy.The Company and the banking industry are subject to extensive regulation and supervision under federal and state laws and regulations. The restrictions imposed by such laws and regulations limit the manner in which the Company conducts its banking business, undertakes new investments and activities and obtains financing. These regulations are designed primarily for the protection of the deposit insurance funds and consumers and not to benefit holders of the Company’s securities. Financial institution regulation has been the subject of significant legislation in recent years and may be the subject of further significant legislation in the future, none of which is in the control of the Company. Significant new laws or changes in, or repeals of, existing laws could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Further, federal monetary policy, particularly as implemented through the Federal Reserve System, significantly affects credit conditions for the Company, and any unfavorable change in these conditions could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. See also “Supervision and Regulation”.
ItemITEM 1B. Unresolved Staff CommentsUNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.Not applicable.

21

- 24 -


ItemITEM 2. PropertiesPROPERTIES
The Company believes that its properties have been adequately maintained, are in good operating condition and are suitable for its business as presently conducted. The Company conducts banking operations at the following locations.
       
Location TYPE OFType LEASED OROwned or Leased EXPIRATION
LOCATIONFACILITYOWNEDOF LEASELease Expiration
Allegany Branch Owned 
Amherst Branch Leased February 2020
Attica Branch Owned 
Auburn Branch Owned 
Avoca Branch Owned 
Batavia Branch Leased December 2016
Batavia (In-Store) Branch Leased July 20092014
Bath Branch Owned 
Bath Drive-up Branch Owned 
Caledonia Branch Leased January 2007July 2012
Canandaigua Branch Owned 
Cuba Branch Owned 
Dansville Branch Ground Leased March 2014
Dundee Branch Owned 
East Aurora Branch Leased January 2013
East RochesterBranchLeasedSeptember 2009
Ellicottville Branch Owned 
Elmira Branch Owned 
Elmira Heights Branch Leased August 20092011
Erwin Branch Leased July 2007October 2010
Geneseo Branch Owned 
Geneva Branch Owned 
Geneva Drive-up Branch Owned 
Geneva (Plaza) Branch Ground Leased January 2016
GreeceBranchLeasedJune 2023
Hammondsport Branch Owned 
HenriettaBranchLeasedJune 2023
Honeoye Falls Branch Leased September 2017
Hornell Branch Owned 
Horseheads Branch Leased OctoberSeptember 2012
Lakeville Branch Owned 
Lakewood Branch Owned 
Leroy Branch Owned 
Mount Morris Branch Owned 
Naples Branch Owned 
North Chili Branch Owned 
North Java Branch Owned 
North Warsaw Branch Owned 
Olean Branch Owned 
Olean Drive-up Branch Owned 
Orchard Park Branch Ground Leased January 2019
Ovid Branch Owned 
Pavilion Branch Owned 
Penn Yan Branch Owned 
PittsfordAdministrative OfficesLeasedApril 2017
Salamanca Branch Owned 
Strykersville Branch Owned 
Victor Branch Owned 
Warsaw (220 Liberty Street) Headquarters Owned 
Warsaw (31(29 North Main Street) Administrative Offices Owned 
Warsaw (55 North Main Street) Main OfficeBranch Owned 
Waterloo Branch Owned 
Wayland Branch Owned 
WilliamsvilleBranchLeasedAugust 2007
Wyoming Branch Leased June 2007March 2010
Yorkshire Branch Ground Leased November 20072012

22

- 25 -


ItemITEM 3. Legal ProceedingsLEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time the Company is a party to or otherwise involved in legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. Management does not believe that there is any pending or threatened proceeding against the Company, which, if determined adversely, would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations or financial condition.
ItemITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security HoldersRESERVED

- 26 -


No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2006.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market and Dividend Information
ITEM 5.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The Company’s common stock of FII is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the ticker symbol “FISI.” At December 31, 2009, 10,820,268 shares of “FISI”.the Company’s stock were outstanding and held by approximately 1,100 shareholders of record. During 2009, the high sales price of our common stock was $15.99 and the low sales price was $3.27. The following chart lists pricesclosing price per share of actual sales transactions as reported by NASDAQ, as well ascommon stock on December 31, 2009, the cashlast trading day of the Company’s fiscal year, was $11.78. The Company declared dividends declared.of $0.40 per common share during the year ended December 31, 2009. See additional information regarding the market price and dividends paid filed herewith in Part II, Item 6, “Selected Financial Data.”
                 
              Cash
              Dividends
  Sales Price Per Share Per Share
  High Low Close Declared
   
2006
                
First Quarter $21.17  $18.16  $18.89  $0.08 
Second Quarter  20.86   17.43   20.86   0.08 
Third Quarter  25.38   19.15   23.36   0.09 
Fourth Quarter  24.25   22.07   23.05   0.09 
                 
2005
                
First Quarter $24.93  $18.93  $19.81  $0.16 
Second Quarter  20.21   17.05   18.02   0.08 
Third Quarter  20.76   15.86   18.41   0.08 
Fourth Quarter  21.98   15.52   19.62   0.08 
FII paysThe Company has paid regular quarterly cash dividends on its common stock and its Board of Directors presently intends to continue the payment of regular quarterly cash dividends,this practice, subject to the need for those funds for debt service and other purposes. However, because substantially all of the funds available for the payment of dividends are derived fromby the Bank, future dividends will depend uponCompany is subject to continued compliance with minimum regulatory capital requirements and CPP restrictions. See the earnings ofdiscussions in the Bank, its financial conditionsection captioned “Supervision and need for funds. Furthermore, there are a number of federal banking policies and regulations that restrict both FII’s and the Bank’s ability to pay dividends. For further discussion on dividend restrictions, refer to theRegulation” included in Part I, Item 1, sections titled “Supervision“Business”, in the section captioned “Liquidity and Regulation”Capital Resources” included in Part II, Item 7, in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and in Note 10, Regulatory Matters, in the accompanying financial statements included in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”, “The Company”all of which are included elsewhere in this report and “The Bank”,incorporated herein by reference thereto.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table sets forth, as these restrictions mayof December 31, 2009, information about our equity compensation plans that have been approved by our shareholders, including the effectnumber of reducing the amount of dividends that FII can declare to its shareholders.

23


Shareholders
At March 2, 2007, the Company had approximately 1,950 common shareholders and 11,336,730 shares of our common stock exercisable under all outstanding (exclusiveoptions, warrants and rights, the weighted average exercise price of treasury shares).all outstanding options, warrants and rights and the number of shares available for future issuance under our equity compensation plans. We have no equity compensation plans that have not been approved by our shareholders.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchases
The table below sets forth the information with respect to purchases made by the Company or any “affiliated purchaser” (as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) of FII common stock during the three months ended December 31, 2006:
                 
              Approximate Dollar
          Total Number of Value of Shares that
  Total     Shares Purchased as May Yet Be
  Number of Average Part of Publicly Purchased Under
  Shares Price Paid Announced Plans or the Plans or
Period Purchased per Share Programs Programs (1)
 
10/01/06 – 10/31/06    $     $5,000,000 
11/01/06 – 11/30/06  4,351   22.48   4,351   4,902,000 
12/01/06 – 12/31/06  1,000 (2)  14.81      4,902,000 
   
                 
Total  5,351  $21.05   4,351  $4,902,000 
   
             
          Number of securities 
      Weighted average  remaining for future 
  Number of securities to  exercise price  issuance under equity 
  be issued upon exercise  of outstanding  compensation plans 
  of outstanding options,  options, warrants  (excluding securities 
Plan Category warrants and rights  and rights  reflected in column (a)) 
  
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders  536,506(1) $20.30(1)  923,646(2)
  
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders    $    
 
(1)On October 25, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a one-year, $5.0 million common stock repurchase program. Under the program, stock repurchases may be made either in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions in amounts and at times and prices as determined by the Company.
(2)Shares were purchased in a private transaction pursuant to an agreement that priced the shares at the Company’s book value at the previous year-end.

24


Performance Graph
The Stock Performance Graph compares the cumulative total return on FII’s common stock against the cumulative total return of the NASDAQ Composite of U.S. Stocks and the SNL Financial LC (“SNL”) $1 Billion — $5 Billion Bank Index, for the period of December 31, 2001 through December 31, 2006. The graph assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 2001 in our common stock and the comparison groups and reinvestment of all cash dividends prior to any tax effect.
                                 
 
    Period Ending 
 Index  12/31/01  12/31/02  12/31/03  12/31/04  12/31/05  12/31/06 
 
 Financial Institutions, Inc.   100.00    127.95    126.40    107.04    92.23    110.10  
 NASDAQ Composite   100.00    68.76    103.67    113.16    115.57    127.58  
 SNL $1B-$5B Bank Index   100.00    115.44    156.98    193.74    190.43    220.36  
 
   
Source : SNL Financial LC, Charlottesville, VA(1) (434) 977-1600Includes 77,772 shares of unvested restricted stock awards outstanding as of December 31, 2009. The weighted average exercise price excludes such awards.
 
© 2007(2) www.snl.comRepresents the 940,000 aggregate shares approved for issuance under the Company’s two active equity compensation plans, reduced by 16,354 shares, which is the 9,972 restricted stock awards issued under these plans to date plus an adjustment of 6,382 shares. Pursuant to the terms of the plans, for purposes of calculating the number of shares available for issuance, each share of common stock granted pursuant to a restricted stock award shall count as 1.64 shares of common stock.

- 27 -


Stock Performance Graph
The stock performance graph below compares (a) the cumulative total return on the Company’s common stock for the period beginning December 31, 2004 as reported by the NASDAQ Global Market, through December 31, 2009, (b) the cumulative total return on stocks included in the NASDAQ Composite Index over the same period, and (c) the cumulative total return, as compiled by SNL Financial L.C., of Major Exchange (NYSE, AMEX and NASDAQ) Banks with $1 billion to $5 billion in assets over the same period. Cumulative return assumes the reinvestment of dividends. The graph was prepared by SNL Financial, LC and is expressed in dollars based on an assumed investment of $100.
                         
  Period Ending 
Index 12/31/04  12/31/05  12/31/06  12/31/07  12/31/08  12/31/09 
Financial Institutions, Inc.  100.00   86.17   102.86   81.43   67.72   58.08 
NASDAQ Composite  100.00   101.37   111.03   121.92   72.49   104.31 
SNL Bank $1B-$5B Index  100.00   98.29   113.74   82.85   68.72   49.26 

25

- 28 -


ItemITEM 6. Selected Financial DataSELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
                     
  At December 31: 
(Dollars in thousands) 2006  2005  2004  2003  2002 
 
Selected Financial Condition Data
                    
                     
Total assets $1,907,552  $2,022,392  $2,156,329  $2,173,732  $2,105,034 
Loans  926,482   992,321   1,252,405   1,340,436   1,314,921 
Allowance for loan losses  17,048   20,231   39,186   29,064   21,660 
Securities available for sale  735,148   790,855   727,198   604,964   596,862 
Securities held to maturity  40,388   42,593   39,317   47,131   47,125 
Total liabilities  1,725,164   1,850,635   1,972,042   1,990,629   1,926,740 
Deposits  1,617,695   1,717,261   1,818,949   1,818,889   1,708,518 
Borrowed funds (1)  87,199   115,199   132,614   154,223   195,441 
Total shareholders’ equity  182,388   171,757   184,287   183,103   178,294 
                     
  For the years ended December 31: 
(Dollars in thousands) 2006  2005  2004  2003  2002 
 
Selected Results of Operations Data
                    
                     
Interest income $103,070  $103,887  $106,175  $111,450  $118,439 
Interest expense  43,604   36,395   30,768   35,947   42,577 
   
                     
Net interest income  59,466   67,492   75,407   75,503   75,862 
                     
(Credit) provision for loan losses  (1,842)  28,532   19,676   22,526   6,119 
   
                     
Net interest income after (credit) provision for loan losses  61,308   38,960   55,731   52,977   69,743 
                     
Noninterest income  21,911   29,384   22,149   22,570   18,680 
Noninterest expense  59,612   65,492   61,767   57,283   49,749 
   
                     
Income from continuing operations before income taxes  23,607   2,852   16,113   18,264   38,674 
                     
Income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations  6,245   (1,766)  3,170   3,923   12,248 
   
                     
Income from continuing operations  17,362   4,618   12,943   14,341   26,426 
                     
Gain (loss) on discontinued operations, net of tax     (2,452)  (450)  (94)  30 
   
                     
Net income $17,362  $2,166  $12,493  $14,247  $26,456 
   
                     
  At or for the year ended December 31, 
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) 2009  2008  2007  2006  2005 
Selected financial condition data:
                    
Total assets $2,062,389  $1,916,919  $1,857,876  $1,907,552  $2,022,392 
Loans, net  1,243,265   1,102,330   948,652   909,434   972,090 
Investment securities  620,074   606,038   754,720   775,536   833,448 
Deposits  1,742,955   1,633,263   1,575,971   1,617,695   1,717,261 
Borrowings  106,390   70,820   68,210   87,199   115,199 
Shareholders’ equity  198,294   190,300   195,322   182,388   171,757 
Common shareholders’ equity(1)
  144,876   137,226   177,741   164,765   154,123 
Tangible common shareholders’ equity(2)
  107,507   99,577   139,786   126,502   115,440 
                     
Selected operations data:
                    
Interest income $94,482  $98,948  $105,212  $103,070  $103,887 
Interest expense  22,217   33,617   47,139   43,604   36,395 
                
Net interest income  72,265   65,331   58,073   59,466   67,492 
Provision (credit) for loan losses  7,702   6,551   116   (1,842)  28,532 
                
Net interest income after provision (credit) for loan losses  64,563   58,780   57,957   61,308   38,960 
Noninterest income (loss)(3)
  18,795   (48,778)  20,680   21,911   29,384 
Noninterest expense  62,777   57,461   57,428   59,612   65,492 
                
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes  20,581   (47,459)  21,209   23,607   2,852 
Income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations  6,140   (21,301)  4,800   6,245   (1,766)
                
Income (loss) from continuing operations  14,441   (26,158)  16,409   17,362   4,618 
Loss on discontinued operations, net of tax              2,452 
                
Net income (loss) $14,441  $(26,158) $16,409  $17,362  $2,166 
                
Preferred stock dividends and accretion�� 3,697   1,538   1,483   1,486   1,488 
                
Net income (loss) applicable to common shareholders $10,744  $(27,696) $14,926  $15,876  $678 
                
                     
Stock and related per share data:
                    
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations per common share:                    
Basic $0.99  $(2.54) $1.34  $1.40  $0.28 
Diluted  0.99   (2.54)  1.33   1.40   0.28 
Earnings (loss) per common share:                    
Basic  0.99   (2.54)  1.34   1.40   0.06 
Diluted  0.99   (2.54)  1.33   1.40   0.06 
Cash dividends declared on common stock  0.40   0.54   0.46   0.34   0.40 
Common book value per share(1)
  13.39   12.71   16.14   14.53   13.60 
Tangible common book value per share(2)
  9.94   9.22   12.69   11.15   10.19 
Market price (NASDAQ: FISI):                    
High  15.99   22.50   23.71   25.38   24.93 
Low  3.27   10.06   16.18   17.43   15.52 
Close  11.78   14.35   17.82   23.05   19.62 
 
(1) Borrowed funds
(1)Excludes preferred shareholders’ equity.
(2)Excludes preferred shareholders’ equity, goodwill and other intangible assets.
(3)The 2009 and 2008 figures include junior subordinated debentures.OTTI charges of $4.7 million and $68.2 million, respectively. There were no OTTI charges in the other years presented.

26

- 29 -


Item 6. Selected Financial Data (Continued)
                     
  At or for the years ended December 31: 
  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002 
 
Per Common Share Data
                    
                     
Basic:                    
Income from continuing operations $1.40  $0.28  $1.02  $1.15  $2.25 
Net income  1.40   0.06   0.98   1.14   2.26 
Diluted:                    
Income from continuing operations $1.40  $0.28  $1.02  $1.14  $2.22 
Net income  1.40   0.06   0.98   1.13   2.23 
Cash dividends declared on common stock  0.34   0.40   0.64   0.64   0.58 
Book value  14.53   13.60   14.81   14.81   14.46 
Tangible book value  11.15   10.19   11.31   11.22   10.74 
Market value  23.05   19.62   23.25   28.23   29.36 
                     
Selected Financial Ratios
                    
                     
Performance Ratios:                    
Return on average common equity  10.02%  0.43%  6.55%  7.65%  17.01%
Return on average tangible common equity  13.23   0.56   8.57   10.12   23.29 
Return on average assets  0.90   0.10   0.57   0.66   1.35 
Common dividend payout (2)  24.29   666.67   65.31   56.14   25.66 
Net interest margin (3)  3.55   3.65   3.90   3.99   4.40 
Efficiency ratio (4)  69.45   70.18   60.41   54.26   49.18 
                     
Asset Quality Ratios:                    
Nonperforming loans to total loans (5)  1.71%  1.82%  4.31%  3.84%  2.82%
Nonperforming loans and other real estate to total loans and other real estate (5)  1.84   1.93   4.40   3.89   2.91 
Nonperforming assets to total assets (5)  0.89   0.97   2.56   2.40   1.82 
Allowance for loan losses to total loans (5)  1.84   2.04   3.13   2.17   1.65 
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans (5)  108   112   73   56   58 
Net charge-offs to average total loans (5)  0.14   4.27   0.74   1.11   0.30 
                     
Capital ratios:                    
Period end common equity to total assets  8.64%  7.62%  7.72%  7.61%  7.63%
Average common equity to average assets  8.17   7.54   7.67   7.74   7.47 
Period end tangible common equity to total tangible assets  6.77   5.82   6.01   5.87   5.78 
Average tangible common equity to average tangible assets  6.32   5.80   5.97   5.96   5.56 
Tier 1 leverage capital  8.91   7.60   7.13   7.03   6.96 
Tier 1 risk-based capital  15.85   13.75   11.27   10.18   9.82 
Total risk-based capital  17.10   15.01   12.54   11.44   11.08 
                     
  At or for the year ended December 31, 
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) 2009  2008  2007  2006  2005 
Selected financial ratios and other data:
                    
Performance ratios:
                    
Net income (loss) (returns on):                    
Average assets  0.71%  -1.37%  0.86%  0.90%  0.10%
Average equity  7.43   -14.30   8.84   9.86   1.22 
Average common equity(1)
  7.61   -16.84   8.89   10.02   0.43 
Average tangible common equity(2)
  10.37   -21.87   11.50   13.23   0.56 
Common dividend payout ratio(3)
  40.40  NA   34.33   24.29   666.67 
Net interest margin (fully tax-equivalent)  4.04   3.93   3.53   3.55   3.65 
Efficiency ratio(4)
  65.52%  64.07%  68.77%  69.78%  70.18%
                     
Capital ratios:
                    
Leverage ratio  7.96%  8.05%  9.35%  8.91%  7.60%
Tier 1 risk-based capital  11.95   11.83   15.74   15.85   13.75 
Total risk-based capital  13.21   13.08   16.99   17.10   15.01 
Equity to assets(5)
  9.55   9.60   9.73   9.08   8.37 
Common equity to assets(1) (5)
  6.94   8.63   8.81   8.17   7.54 
Tangible common equity to tangible assets(2)(5)
  5.19%  6.78%  6.95%  6.32%  5.80%
                     
Asset quality (6):
                    
Non-performing loans $8,681  $8,196  $8,077  $15,840  $18,037 
Non-performing assets  10,442   9,252   9,498   17,043   19,713 
Allowance for loan losses  20,741   18,749   15,521   17,048   20,231 
Net loan charge-offs $5,710  $3,323  $1,643  $1,341  $47,487 
Total non-performing loans to total loans  0.69%  0.73%  0.84%  1.71%  1.82%
Total non-performing assets to total assets  0.51   0.48   0.51   0.89   0.97 
Net charge-offs to average loans  0.47   0.32   0.18   0.14   4.27 
Allowance for loan losses to total loans  1.64   1.67   1.61   1.84   2.04 
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans  239%  229%  192%  108%  112%
                     
Other data:
                    
Number of branches  51   52   50   50   50 
Full time equivalent employees  572   600   621   640   700 
 
(2) Cash dividends declared on common stock divided by basic net income per common share.
(1)Excludes preferred shareholders’ equity.
 
(3)(2) Represents net interest income divided by average interest-earningExcludes preferred shareholders’ equity, goodwill and other intangible assets. The interest earned from tax-exempt securities includes a tax-equivalent adjustment.
 
(4)(3) The efficiencyCommon dividend payout ratio representsequals dividends declared during the year divided by earnings per share for the year. There is no ratio shown for years where the Company both declared a dividend and incurred a loss because the ratio would result in a negative payout since the dividend declared (paid out) will always be greater than 100% of earnings.
(4)Efficiency ratio equals noninterest expense less other real estate expense and amortization of intangibles (all from continuing operations) divided byintangible assets as a percentage of net revenue, defined as the sum of tax-equivalent net interest income (tax-equivalent) plus otherand noninterest income less gainbefore net gains and impairment charges on sale ofinvestment securities, gain on sale of credit card portfolio, gain on sale of trust relationshipsproceeds from company owned life insurance included in income, and net gain on salegains from the sales of commercial-related loans held for sale and trust relationships (all from continuing operations).
 
(5)Ratios calculated using average balances for the periods shown.
(6) Ratios exclude nonaccruingnon-accruing commercial-related loans held for sale (which amounted to $577,000 at December 31,($577 thousand for 2005 and zero for all other years presented) from nonperformingnon-performing loans and exclude loans held for sale from total loans.

27

- 30 -


SELECTED QUARTERLY DATA
                 
  2009 
  Fourth  Third  Second  First 
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) Quarter  Quarter  Quarter  Quarter 
Interest income $24,390  $23,697  $23,302  $23,093 
Interest expense  5,175   5,619   5,657   5,766 
             
Net interest income  19,215   18,078   17,645   17,327 
Provision for loan losses  1,088   2,620   2,088   1,906 
             
Net interest income, after provision for loan losses  18,127   15,458   15,557   15,421 
Noninterest income  5,183   4,406   4,515   4,691 
Noninterest expense  15,117   15,142   16,440   16,078 
             
Income before income taxes  8,193   4,722   3,632   4,034 
Income tax expense  2,756   1,313   1,004   1,067 
             
Net income $5,437  $3,409  $2,628  $2,967 
             
Preferred stock dividends  927   927   925   918 
             
Net income applicable to common shareholders $4,510  $2,482  $1,703  $2,049 
             
                 
Earnings per common share(1):
                
Basic $0.42  $0.23  $0.16  $0.19 
Diluted  0.42   0.23   0.16   0.19 
Market price (NASDAQ: FISI):                
High $12.25  $15.00  $15.99  $14.95 
Low  9.71   9.90   6.98   3.27 
Close  11.78   9.97   13.66   7.62 
Dividends declared $0.10  $0.10  $0.10  $0.10 
                 
  2008 
  Fourth  Third  Second  First 
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) Quarter  Quarter  Quarter  Quarter 
Interest income $24,582  $24,558  $24,536  $25,272 
Interest expense  7,269   7,812   8,349   10,187 
             
Net interest income  17,313   16,746   16,187   15,085 
Provision for loan losses  2,586   1,891   1,358   716 
             
Net interest income, after provision for loan losses  14,727   14,855   14,829   14,369 
Noninterest (loss) income  (25,106)  (29,348)  932   4,744 
Noninterest expense  15,394   13,409   14,385   14,273 
             
(Loss) income before income taxes  (25,773)  (27,902)  1,376   4,840 
Income tax (benefit) expense  (22,631)  524   (255)  1,061 
             
Net (loss) income $(3,142) $(28,426) $1,631  $3,779 
             
Preferred stock dividends  426   371   370   371 
             
Net (loss) income applicable to common shareholders $(3,568) $(28,797) $1,261  $3,408 
             
                 
(Loss) earnings per common share(1):
                
Basic $(0.33) $(2.68) $0.12  $0.31 
Diluted  (0.33)  (2.68)  0.12   0.31 
Market price (NASDAQ: FISI):                
High $20.27  $22.50  $20.00  $20.78 
Low  10.06   14.82   15.25   15.10 
Close  14.35   20.01   16.06   18.95 
Dividends declared $0.10  $0.15  $0.15  $0.14 
(1)Earnings (loss) per share data is computed independently for each of the quarters presented. Therefore, the sum of the quarterly earnings or loss per common share amounts may not equal the total for the year.

- 31 -


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation
ITEM 7.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
GENERAL
The principal objective of thisfollowing discussion is management’s analysis to provide an overviewassist in the understanding and evaluation of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company during the year ended December 31, 2006 and the preceding two years. This discussion and the tabular presentationsCompany. It should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes.related notes filed herewith in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” and the description of the business filed herewith in Part I, Item 1, “Business.”
Income. OVERVIEW
Financial Institutions, Inc. is a financial holding company headquartered in New York State, providing banking and nonbanking financial services to individuals and businesses primarily in its Central and Western New York footprint. The Company, principally through its wholly-owned banking subsidiary, provides a wide range of services, including business and consumer loan and depository services, as well as other traditional banking services. Through its nonbanking subsidiary, the Company provides brokerage services to supplement the banking business.
The Company’s resultsprimary sources of operationsrevenue, through its banking subsidiary, are dependent primarily on net interest income which is the difference between the income earned on(predominantly from loans and deposits, and also from investment securities and other funding sources), and noninterest income, particularly fees and other revenue from financial services provided to customers or ancillary services tied to loans and deposits. Business volumes and pricing drive revenue potential, and tend to be influenced by overall economic factors, including market interest rates, business spending, consumer confidence, economic growth, and competitive conditions within the marketplace.
Net income allocated to common shareholders for 2009 was $10.7 million (compared to net loss allocated to shareholders of $27.7 million in 2008), diluted earnings per common share were $0.99 (versus diluted loss per common share of $2.54 for 2008), net interest paidincome was $72.3 million on depositsa margin of 4.04% (compared to $65.3 million on a margin of 3.93% for 2008), and borrowings. Results of operations are also affected by the (credit) provision for loan losses was $7.7 million with net charge offs to average loans of 0.47% (compared to a provision of $6.6 million and a net charge off ratio of 0.32% for 2008).
Total loans increased $142.9 million or 13% between year-end 2009 and 2008, with increases in most loan categories (including commercial loans up $71.6 million and consumer indirect loans up $97.6 million). On average, loans increased $184.9 million or 18%, primarily from a $128.0 million in consumer indirect loans.
Total deposits increased $109.7 million or 7% between year-end 2009 and 2008, primarily attributable to noninterest-bearing demand and certificates of deposits. On average, total deposits increased $113.2 million or 7% over 2008, primarily in certificates of deposit. Deposit growth remains a key to improving net interest income and the quality of earnings in 2010. Competition for deposits remains high. The changes in FDIC insurance have been beneficial to deposit growth. Future deposit levels could be affected by changes in these programs. For example, deposits could be affected by the termination of the TAG Program at June 30, 2010 (see Part I, Item 1, Section “Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008” for a detailed discussion of the TAG Program).
Noninterest income of $18.8 million in 2009 included OTTI write-downs of $4.7 million and net gains from security sales of $3.4 million. Noninterest loss of $48.8 million in 2008 included OTTI write-downs of $68.2 million and net gains from security sales of $288 thousand. Excluding those securities transactions, noninterest income was up $883 thousand in 2009 from 2008, primarily from income from company owned life insurance and mortgage banking income (including a $360 increase in gains on sales of loans to the secondary market and a $644 thousand increase in loan servicing income), partially offset by a decrease in net core fee-based revenue categories (down $571 thousand, and defined as service charges on deposits, financial services groupdeposit accounts, ATM and debit fees, and commissions, mortgage banking revenues, gainbroker-dealer fees and commissions).
Noninterest expense of $62.8 million grew $5.3 million or loss on the sale of securities, gain or loss on sale of loans and other miscellaneous income.
Expenses. The Company’s expenses primarily consist of salaries9% over 2008. Salaries and employee benefits occupancy and equipment, supplies and postage, amortization of other intangible assets, computer and data processing, professional fees and services, other miscellaneous expense and income tax expense (benefit). Results of operations are also significantly affected by general economic and competitive conditions, particularly changes in interest rates, government policies and the actions of regulatory authorities.
OVERVIEW
Net income was $17.4were $33.6 million, up $2.2 million or 7% versus 2008, of which $2.1 million was fringe benefits expense. On average, full time equivalent employees decreased 4% between 2009 and $12.52008 (from 610 for 2008 to 586 for 2009). Non-personnel noninterest expenses on an aggregate basis were up $3.1 million or 12% over 2008, primarily due to higher FDIC insurance assessments.
The Company’s sale of preferred shares under the Treasury’s TARP in December 2008 increased shareholders’ equity by $37.5 million. The Company is evaluating repayment alternatives relative to the TARP funds to determine the most economically beneficial option for 2006, 2005the Company and 2004, respectively. Diluted earnings per shareshareholders.

- 32 -


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
The Company’s reported net income of $14.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $1.40,2009, compared to $0.06a net loss of $26.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. For 2009, net income allocated to common shareholders was $10.7 million, or $0.99 for both basic and diluted earnings per common share. Net loss allocated to common shareholders was $27.7 million for 2008, or a net loss of $2.54 for both basic and diluted earnings per common share. Cash dividends of $0.40 per common share were paid in 2005 and $0.98 in 2004. The return on average common equity in 2006 was 10.02%,2009, compared to 0.43%cash dividends of $0.54 per common share paid in 20052008. Key factors behind these results are discussed below.
The recent market conditions have been marked with general economic and 6.55%industry declines with an impact on consumer confidence, business and personal financial performance, and commercial and residential real estate markets, resulting in 2004. The return on average assetsan increase in 2006 was 0.90%,nonperforming loans, net charge offs, and provision for loan losses. Nonperforming loans were $8.7 million at December 31, 2009, compared to 0.10%$8.2 million at December 31, 2008. Net charge offs were $5.7 million in 2005 and 0.57%2009 (or 0.47% of average loans) compared to $3.3 million in 2004.
2008 (or 0.32% of average loans). The primary factor for the improved 2006 results was a $1.8 million credit for loan losses in 2006 compared with a $28.5 million and $19.7 million provision for loan losses was $7.7 million and $6.6 million, respectively, for 2009 and 2008. At year-end 2009, the allowance for loan losses represented 1.64% of total loans (covering 239% of non-performing loans), compared to 1.67% (covering 229% of nonperforming loans) at year-end 2008. See also sections, “Allowance for Loan Losses” and “Non-performing and Potential Problem Loans” for additional information on net charge-offs and non-performing loans.
At December 31, 2009, total loans were $1.264 billion, up 13% from year-end 2008, primarily in 2005commercial based and 2004,indirect auto loans. Total deposits at December 31, 2009, were $1.743 billion, up 7% from year-end 2008, primarily attributable to higher noninterest-bearing demand and certificates of deposits.
Taxable equivalent net interest income was $75.0 million for 2009 or 8% higher than $69.6 million in 2008. Taxable equivalent interest income decreased $6.1 million, while interest expense decreased by $11.4 million. The increase in taxable equivalent net interest income was a function of both favorable volume variances (increasing taxable equivalent net interest income by $2.6 million) and rate variances (increasing taxable equivalent net interest income by $2.7 million). See also section, “Net Interest Income” for additional information on taxable equivalent net interest income and net interest margin.
The net interest margin for 2009 was 4.04%, 11 basis points higher than 3.93% in 2008. The increase in net interest margin was attributable to a 30 basis point increase in interest rate spread (the net of a 90 basis point decrease in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities and a 60 basis decrease in the yield on earning assets), partially offset by a 19 basis point lower contribution from net free funds (primarily attributable to lower rates on interest-bearing liabilities reducing the value of noninterest-bearing deposits and other net free funds).
Noninterest income was $18.8 million for 2009. Core fee-based revenues (defined as service charges on deposit accounts, ATM and debit fees, and broker-dealer fees and commissions) totaled $14.7 million for 2009, down $571 thousand or 4% from $15.3 million for 2008. Net mortgage banking income was $2.0 million for 2009, compared to $1.0 million in 2008, an increase of $1.0 million from 2008, primarily attributable to higher secondary mortgage production experienced during 2009 due to the low interest rate environment and the favorable impact on refinance activity. For additional discussion concerning noninterest income see section, “Noninterest Income.”
Net investment securities losses (defined as net gain on disposal of investment securities and impairment charges on investment securities) were $1.2 million and for 2009, compared to net investment securities losses of $67.9 million for 2008, primarily attributable to other-than-temporary write-downs on investment securities.
Noninterest expense for 2009 was $62.8 million, an increase of $5.3 million or 9% over 2008. FDIC assessments increased $3.0 million, salaries and employee benefits increased $2.2 million, and collectively all remaining noninterest expense categories were up $142 thousand compared to 2008. The efficiency ratio (as defined under Part II, Item 6, “Selected Financial Data”) was 65.52% for 2009 and 64.07% for 2008. For additional discussion regarding noninterest expense see section, “Noninterest Expense.”
Income tax expense for 2009 was $6.1 million, compared to income tax benefit of $21.3 million for 2008. The change in income tax was primarily due to the increase to pretax income from a pretax loss between the years. For additional discussion concerning income tax see section, “Income Taxes.”

- 33 -


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
OVERVIEW
At December 31, 2009, the Company had total assets of $2.062 billion, an increase of 8% from $1.917 billion as of December 31, 2008, primarily a result of the continued growth of its core business of loans and deposits. Loans totaled $1.264 billion as of December 31, 2009, up $142.9 million, or 13%, when compared to $1.121 billion as of December 31, 2008. The increase in loans was primarily attributed to the expansion of the indirect lending program and commercial business development efforts. Nonperforming assets totaled $10.4 million as of December 31, 2009, up $1.2 million from a year ago, primarily due to the addition of non-performing investment securities for which the Company has stopped accruing interest. Total deposits amounted to $1.743 billion and $1.633 billion as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. As of December 31, 2009, total borrowed funds were $106.4 million, comparable to $70.8 million as of December 31, 2008. Book value per common share was $13.39 and $12.71 as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. As of December 31, 2009 the Company’s total shareholders’ equity was $198.3 million compared to $190.3 million a year earlier.
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
The following table summarizes the composition of the available for sale and held to maturity security portfolios (in thousands).
                         
  Investment Securities Portfolio Composition 
  At December 31, 
  2009  2008  2007 
  Amortized  Fair  Amortized  Fair  Amortized  Fair 
  Cost  Value  Cost  Value  Cost  Value 
Securities available for sale:
                        
U.S. Government agency and government-sponsored enterprise securities $134,564  $134,105  $67,871  $68,173  $158,920  $158,940 
State and political subdivisions  80,812   83,659   129,572   131,711   171,294   172,601 
Mortgage-backed securities:                        
Agency mortgage-backed securities  356,044   356,355   297,278   303,105   239,427   238,101 
Non-Agency mortgage-backed securities  5,087   5,160   42,296   39,447   58,371   57,771 
Asset-backed securities  1,295   1,222   3,918   3,918   34,115   33,198 
Equity securities        923   1,152   33,930   34,630 
                   
Total available for sale securities  577,802   580,501   541,858   547,506   696,057   695,241 
Securities held to maturity:
                        
State and political subdivisions  39,573   40,629   58,532   59,147   59,479   59,902 
                   
Total investment securities $617,375  $621,130  $600,390  $606,653  $755,536  $755,143 
                   

- 34 -


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Impairment Assessment
The Company also reduced noninterest expensereviews investment securities on an ongoing basis for the presence of other-than-temporary-impairment (“OTTI”) with formal reviews performed quarterly. Declines in the fair value of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses to the extent the impairment is related to credit losses or the security is no longer intended to be held until the recovery of amortized cost. The amount of the impairment related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income. Evaluating whether the impairment of a debt security is other than temporary involves assessing i.) the intent to sell the debt security or ii.) the likelihood of being required to sell the security before the recovery of its amortized cost basis. In determining whether the other-than temporary impairment includes a credit loss, the Company uses its best estimate of the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the debt security considering factors such as: a.) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than the amortized cost basis, b.) adverse conditions specifically related to the security, an industry, or a geographic area, c.) the historical and implied volatility of the fair value of the security, d.) the payment structure of the debt security and the likelihood of the issuer being able to make payments that increase in the future, e.) failure of the issuer of the security to make scheduled interest or principal payments, f.) any changes to the rating of the security by a rating agency, and g.) recoveries or additional declines in fair value subsequent to the balance sheet date.
As of December 31, 2009, management does not have the intent to sell any of the securities in a loss position and believes that it is likely that it will not be required to sell any such securities before the anticipated recovery of amortized cost. The unrealized losses are largely due to increases in market interest rates over the yields available at the time the underlying securities were purchased. The fair value is expected to recover as the bonds approach their maturity date or repricing date or if market yields for such investments decline. Management does not believe any of the securities in a loss position are impaired due to reasons of credit quality. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2009, management has concluded that unrealized losses on its investment securities are temporary and no further impairment loss has been realized in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. The following discussion provides further details of the Company’s assessment of the securities portfolio by investment category.
The table below summarizes unrealized losses in each category of the securities portfolio at the end of the periods indicated (in thousands).
                         
  Unrealized Losses on Investment Securities 
  At December 31, 
  2009  2008  2007 
  Unrealized  % of  Unrealized  % of  Unrealized  % of 
  Losses  Total  Losses  Total  Losses  Total 
Securities available for sale:
                        
U.S. Government agency and government-sponsored enterprise securities $545   19.8% $307   7.3% $324   7.5%
State and political subdivisions  3   0.1   42   1.0   261   6.0 
Mortgage-backed securities:                        
Agency mortgage-backed securities  1,638   59.3   981   23.1   1,868   43.2 
Non-Agency mortgage-backed securities  330   12.0   2,854   67.3   890   20.6 
Asset-backed securities  244   8.8         972   22.5 
Equity securities        52   1.2       
                   
Total available for sale securities  2,760   100.0   4,236   99.9   4,315   99.8 
Securities held to maturity:
                        
State and political subdivisions        4   0.1   8   0.2 
                   
Total investment securities $2,760   100.0% $4,240   100.0% $4,323   100.0%
                   
U.S. Government Agencies and Government Sponsored Enterprises (“GSE”).As of December 31, 2009, there were 30 securities in the U.S. Government agencies and GSE portfolio that were in an unrealized loss position. These securities had an aggregate amortized cost of $94.0 million and unrealized losses of $545 thousand. Of the securities in an unrealized loss position, 8 securities with a total amortized cost of $10.0 million and unrealized losses of $185 thousand were in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or longer. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates and illiquidity, and not credit quality, and because the Company does not have the intent to sell these securities and it is likely that it will not be required to sell the securities before their anticipated recovery, the Company does not consider these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2009.

- 35 -


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
State and Political Subdivisions.At December 31, 2009, the state and political subdivisions portfolio (“municipals”) totaled $123.2 million, of which $83.7 million was classified as available for sale. As of that date, $39.5 million was classified as held to maturity, with a fair value of $40.6 million. As of December 31, 2009, there were 3 municipals that were in an unrealized loss position. These securities had an aggregate amortized cost of $153 thousand and unrealized losses of $3 thousand.
Agency Mortgage-backed Securities.At December 31, 2009, with the exception of the non-Agency mortgage-backed securities (“non-Agency MBS”) discussed below, all of the mortgage-backed securities held by the Company were issued by U.S. government sponsored entities and agencies (“Agency MBS”), primarily FNMA and the FHLMC. The contractual cash flows of the Company’s Agency MBS are guaranteed by FNMA, FHLMC or GNMA. FNMA and FHLMC are government sponsored enterprises that were placed under the conservatorship of the U.S. government during the third quarter of 2008. The GNMA mortgage-backed securities are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. The Company sold Agency MBS securities with an amortized cost totaling $152.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2009, and realized a gain of $5.9 million on those sales.
Given the high credit quality inherent in 2006 comparedAgency MBS, the Company does not consider any of the unrealized losses as of December 31, 2009, on such MBS to be credit related. As a result of its analyses, the Company determined at December 31, 2009 that the unrealized losses on its Agency MBS are temporary. At December 31, 2009, the Company did not intend to sell any of Agency MBS that were in an unrealized loss position, all of which were performing in accordance with 2005. their terms.
Non-Agency Mortgage-backed Securities.The improved risk profileCompany’s non-Agency MBS portfolio consists of positions in five privately issued whole loan collateralized mortgage obligations with a fair value of $5.2 million and net unrealized gains of approximately $70 thousand at December 31, 2009. As of that date, there were two non-Agency MBS with an aggregate amortized cost of $3.3 million and unrealized losses of $330 thousand that have been in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or longer.
The Company sold 12 non-Agency MBS with aggregate amortized costs of $24.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2009, realizing net losses totaling $3.0 million on those sales. Of the securities sold, the Company had recognized OTTI charges totaling $2.2 million on four of the securities, of which $1.7 million was recorded during 2009.
As of December 31, 2009, there were three non-Agency MBS with an aggregate amortized cost of $1.8 million rated below investment grade. None of these securities was in an unrealized loss position. To date, the Company has recognized aggregate OTTI charges due to reasons of credit quality of $6.0 million against these securities, of which $660 thousand was recorded during 2009.
As a result of its analyses, the Company determined at December 31, 2009 that the unrealized losses on its non-Agency MBS are temporary. These temporary unrealized losses are believed to be primarily related to an overall widening in liquidity spreads related to the reduced liquidity and uncertainty in the markets and not the credit quality of the individual issuer or underlying assets. At December 31, 2009, the Company did not intend to sell any of its non-Agency MBS that were in an unrealized loss position prior to recovery of amortized cost.
Asset-backed Securities (“ABS”).As of December 31, 2009, the carrying value of the ABS portfolio totaled $1.3 million and consisted of positions in 15 securities, the majority of which are pooled trust preferred securities (“TPS”) collateralized by preferred debt issued primarily by financial institutions and, to a lesser extent, insurance companies located throughout the United States. As a result of some issuers defaulting and others electing to defer interest payments on the preferred debt which collateralize the securities, the Company considered the TPS to be non-performing and stopped accruing interest on the investments during 2009.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recognized OTTI charges totaling $2.3 million against all but one of these ABS, all of which were acquired prior to November 2007. Since the second quarter of 2008, the Company has written down each of the securities in the ABS portfolio, resulting in OTTI charges totaling $32.3 million through December 31, 2009. The Company expects to recover the remaining carrying value of $1.3 million, representing the Company’s maximum exposure to future OTTI charges on the current ABS portfolio. As of December 31, 2009, each of the securities in the ABS portfolio was rated below investment grade. There were 9 ABS securities in a loss position with an aggregate amortized cost of $522 thousand and unrealized losses totaling $244 thousand as of December 31, 2009. Each of these securities has been in loss position for less than 12 months.
Equity Securities.During the first quarter of 2009 the Company liquidated its equity securities portfolio, which consisted of auction rate preferred equity securities collateralized by FNMA and FHLMC preferred stock and common equity securities. A $152 thousand loss was realized on the sale of the equity securities portfolio, comprised of aggregate losses totaling $242 thousand related to the preferred equity securities and an aggregate gain of $90 thousand from sale of the common equity securities.
Other Investments.Recently, credit concern surrounding the Federal Home Loan Bank system has been widespread. As a member of the FHLB the Bank is required to hold FHLB stock. The amount of required FHLB stock is based on the Bank’s asset size and the amount of borrowings from the FHLB. The Company has assessed the ultimate recoverability of its FHLB stock and believes no impairment currently exists. The Company’s ownership of FHLB stock, which totaled $3.3 million at December 31, 2009, is included in other assets and recorded at cost.
As a member of the FRB system, the Company is required to maintain a specified investment in FRB stock based on a ratio relative to the Company’s capital. FRB stock totaled $3.9 million at December 31, 2009, is included in other assets and recorded at cost.

- 36 -


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Below Investment Grade Securities
The Company’s non-Agency MBS and ABS are rated by a nationally recognized rating agency, such as Moody’s Investors Services, Inc. (“Moody’s”), Standard & Poor’s Corporation (“S&P”) or Fitch, Inc. (collectively, “Rating Agencies”). The rating indicates the opinion of the Rating Agency as to the credit worthiness of the investment, indicating the obligor’s ability to meet its financial commitment on the obligation. Investment grade includes all securities with Fitch/S&P ratings above BB+ and Moody’s ratings above Ba1. Securities with a Fitch/S&P rating below BBB- and Moody’s ratings below Baa3 are considered to be below investment grade. The Company uses the lowest rating provided by either of the Rating Agencies when classifying each security as investment grade or below investment grade.
The following table provides detail of securities rated below investment grade (dollars in thousands).
                                 
  As of December 31, 2009  OTTI losses recognized in earnings 
  Number              Unrealized  For the year ended    
Current of  Par  Amortized  Fair  Gains  December 31,  Total 
Rating(1) Cusips  Value  Cost  Value  (Losses)  2008  2009  to Date 
                                 
Securities with unrealized gains:
                                
Non-Agency MBS:                                
Ba1/CCC  1  $1,404  $609  $646  $37  $626  $166  $792 
CC/B(2)
  1   2,411   672   672      1,240   494   1,734 
CC(3)
  1   3,814   492   859   367   3,513      3,513 
                         
   3   7,629   1,773   2,177   404   5,379   660   6,039 
                                 
Asset-backed securities:                                
Baa3/CC(4)
  1   661   68   206   138   545   50   595 
Caa2/CCC(5)
  1   1,996   36   36      1,615   313   1,928 
Caa3/CC(6)
  1   3,000   59   70   11   2,860      2,860 
Ca/CCC(5)
  1   2,977   37   56   19   2,435   476   2,911 
Ca/CC(6)
  2   9,050   573   576   3   7,773   495   8,268 
                         
   6   17,684   773   944   171   15,228   1,334   16,562 
                         
Total securities with unrealized gains  9   25,313   2,546   3,121   575   20,607   1,994   22,601 
                         
                                 
Securities with unrealized losses:
                                
Asset-backed securities:                                
Ca/CC(6)
  4   6,392   337   166   (171)  5,481   437   5,918 
Ca/C  2   3,144   45   28   (17)  2,826   147   2,973 
C/CC(6)
  2   5,029   80   65   (15)  4,570   388   4,958 
Ca/D  1   2,000   60   18   (42)  1,868   8   1,876 
                         
Total securities with unrealized losses  9   16,565   522   277   (245)  14,745   980   15,725 
                         
                                 
   18  $41,878  $3,068  $3,398  $330  $35,352  $2,974  $38,326 
                         
(1)Ratings presented are Moody’s/Fitch except as noted.
(2)Ratings presented are Fitch /S&P.
(3)Rating presented is S&P.
(4)Ratings presented are Moody’s/S&P.
(5)Securities were further downgraded by Fitch to a rating of CC during February 2010.
(6)Securities were further downgraded by Fitch to a rating of C during February 2010.
During 2009 the Company realized losses totaling $1.6 million from the sale of three non-Agency MBS securities which were rated below investment grade. At the time of sale, the securities had a combined adjusted carrying value of $4.1 million. The adjusted carrying value reflects impairment charges of $1.7 million and $539 thousand taken against the securities during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

- 37 -


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
LENDING ACTIVITIES
The composition of the Company’s loan portfolio, contributedexcluding loans held for sale and including net unearned income and net deferred fees and costs, is summarized as follows (in thousands):
                                         
  Loan Portfolio Composition 
  At December 31, 
  2009  2008  2007  2006  2005 
  Amount  Percent  Amount  Percent  Amount  Percent  Amount  Percent  Amount  Percent 
Commercial $186,386   14.8% $158,543   14.1% $136,780   14.2% $105,806   11.4% $116,444   11.7%
Commercial real estate  308,873   24.4   262,234   23.4   245,797   25.5   243,966   26.4   264,727   26.7 
Agricultural  41,872   3.3   44,706   4.0   47,367   4.9   56,808   6.1   75,018   7.5 
Residential real estate  144,215   11.4   177,683   15.8   166,863   17.3   163,243   17.6   168,498   17.0 
Consumer indirect  352,611   27.9   255,054   22.8   134,977   14.0   106,443   11.5   85,237   8.6 
Consumer direct and home equity  230,049   18.2   222,859   19.9   232,389   24.1   250,216   27.0   282,397   28.5 
                               
Total loans  1,264,006   100.0%  1,121,079   100.0%  964,173   100.0%  926,482   100.0%  992,321   100.0%
Allowance for loan losses  20,741       18,749       15,521       17,048       20,231     
                                    
Total loans, net $1,243,265      $1,102,330      $948,652      $909,434      $972,090     
                                    
Total loans increased 13%, or $142.9 million, to $1.264 billion as of December 31, 2009 from $1.121 billion as of December 31, 2008, primarily attributed to the expansion of the indirect lending program and commercial business development efforts, offset by a reduction in agricultural and residential real estate loans.
Commercial loans and commercial real estate loans increased $74.5 million to $495.3 million as of December 31, 2009 from $420.8 million as of December 31, 2008, a result of the Company’s continued focus on commercial business development programs. Agricultural loans decreased $2.8 million, to $41.9 million as of December 31, 2009 from $44.7 million as of December 31, 2008. Competition and adherence to strict credit standards has led to payments outpacing new loan originations in the agricultural portfolio.
Residential real estate loans decreased $33.5 million to $144.2 million as of December 31, 2009 in comparison to $177.7 million as of December 31, 2008. This category of loans decreased as the majority of newly originated and refinanced residential mortgages were sold to the secondary market. In addition, the Company securitized and sold $16.0 million in residential real estate loans during the second quarter of 2009. The Company does not engage in sub-prime or other high-risk residential mortgage lending as a line-of-business.
Parts of the country have experienced a significant decline in real estate values that has led, in some cases, to the debt on the real estate exceeding the value of the real estate. The Western and Central New York markets the Company serves have not generally experienced, to this point, such conditions. Should deterioration in real estate values in the markets we serve occur, the value and liquidity of real estate securing the Company’s loans could become impaired. While the Company is not engaged in the business of sub-prime lending, a decline in the value of residential or commercial real estate could have a material adverse effect on the value of property used as collateral for our loans.
The consumer indirect portfolio increased 38% to $352.6 million as of December 31, 2009 from $255.1 million as of December 31, 2008. The Company increased its indirect portfolio by managing existing and developing new relationships with over 250 franchised auto dealers, primarily in Western and Central New York. During the year ended December 31, 2009 the Company originated $199.1 million in indirect auto loans with a mix of approximately 32% new auto and 68% used auto. This compares with $180.9 million in indirect loan auto originations with a mix of approximately 38% new auto and 62% used auto for the same period in 2008.
There is increased risk associated with auto and consumer loans during economic downturns as increased unemployment and inflationary costs may make it more difficult for some borrowers to repay their loans. While the asset quality of these portfolios is currently good, deterioration in the economy of the regions where these loans were extended could have an adverse impact on the amount of credit losses the Company experiences in the future.
Loans Held for Sale and Mortgage Servicing Rights.Loans held for sale (not included in the loan portfolio composition table) totaled $421 thousand and $1.0 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, all of which were residential real estate loans.
The Company sells certain qualifying newly originated and refinanced residential real estate mortgages on the secondary market. The sold and serviced residential real estate loan portfolio increased to $349.8 million as of December 31, 2009 from $315.7 million as of December 31, 2008. The increase in the sold and serviced portfolio resulted from an increase in residential loan origination and refinancing volumes, complemented by the Company’s securitization and sale of $16.0 million in residential real estate loans during the second quarter of 2009.

- 38 -


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Allowance for Loan Losses
The following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for loan losses (in thousands).
                     
  Loan Loss Analysis 
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2009  2008  2007  2006  2005 
Allowance for loan losses, beginning of year $18,749  $15,521  $17,048  $20,231  $39,186 
Charge-offs(1):
                    
Commercial  2,317   675   562   1,195   12,980 
Commercial real estate  355   1,190   439   501   15,397 
Agricultural  43   47   56   379   18,543 
Residential real estate  225   320   319   278   56 
Consumer indirect  3,637   2,011   988   532   775 
Consumer direct and home equity  1,253   1,216   1,531   1,314   1,535 
                
Total charge-offs  7,830   5,459   3,895   4,199   49,286 
Recoveries:                    
Commercial  407   664   972   1,417   864 
Commercial real estate  130   280   216   132   280 
Agricultural  41   55   168   389   57 
Residential real estate  12   26   50   71   5 
Consumer indirect  1,030   548   235   224   261 
Consumer direct and home equity  500   563   611   625   332 
                
Total recoveries  2,120   2,136   2,252   2,858   1,799 
                
Net charge-offs  5,710   3,323   1,643   1,341   47,487 
Provision (credit) for loan losses  7,702   6,551   116   (1,842)  28,532 
                
Allowance for loan losses, end of year $20,741  $18,749  $15,521  $17,048  $20,231 
                
  
Net charge-offs to average loans  0.47%  0.32%  0.18%  0.14%  4.27%
Allowance to end of period loans  1.64%  1.67%  1.61%  1.84%  2.04%
Allowance to end of period non-performing loans  239%  229%  192%  108%  112%
(1)During 2005 the Company transferred $169.0 million in commercial-related loans to held for sale, at an estimated fair value less costs to sell of $132.3 million, resulting in $36.7 million in commercial-related charge-offs. In the second half of 2005, the Company realized a net gain of $9.4 million on the ultimate sale or settlement of commercial-related loans held for sale.

- 39 -


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The following table sets forth the allocation of the allowance for loan losses by loan category as of the dates indicated. The allocation is made for analytical purposes and is not necessarily indicative of the categories in which actual losses may occur. The total allowance is available to absorb losses from any segment of the loan portfolio (in thousands).
                                         
  Allowance for Loan Losses by Loan Category 
  At December 31, 
  2009  2008  2007  2006  2005 
      Percentage      Percentage      Percentage      Percentage      Percentage 
  Loan  of loans by  Loan  of loans by  Loan  of loans by  Loan  of loans by  Loan  of loans by 
  Loss  category to  Loss  category to  Loss  category to  Loss  category to  Loss  category to 
  Allowance  total loans  Allowance  total loans  Allowance  total loans  Allowance  total loans  Allowance  total loans 
Commercial $4,060   14.8% $2,871   14.1% $1,878   14.2% $2,443   11.4% $4,098   11.7%
Commercial real estate  5,991   24.4   4,052   23.4   3,751   25.5   4,458   26.4   6,564   26.7 
Agricultural  994   3.3   1,012   4.0   1,516   4.9   1,887   6.1   2,187   7.5 
Residential real estate  1,251   11.4   2,516   15.8   1,763   17.3   1,748   17.6   1,252   17.0 
Consumer indirect  6,837   27.9   5,152   22.8   2,284   14.0   1,749   11.5   1,032   8.6 
Consumer direct and home equity  1,608   18.2   3,146   19.9   2,667   24.1   2,833   27.0   2,504   28.5 
Unallocated(1)
              1,662      1,930      2,594    
                               
Total $20,741   100.0% $18,749   100.0% $15,521   100.0% $17,048   100.0% $20,231   100.0%
                               
(1)During 2008 management revised estimation techniques related to allocation of the allowance to specific loan segments. The result was the elimination of the unallocated portion of the allowance for loan losses and allocation of the entire balance to specific loan segments.
Management believes that the allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2009 is adequate to cover probable losses in the loan portfolio at that date. Factors beyond the Company’s control, however, such as general national and local economic conditions, can adversely impact the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Lower noninterest expense resulted from improved operating efficiencies fromAs a result, no assurance can be given that adverse economic conditions or other circumstances will not result in increased losses in the consolidationportfolio or that the allowance for loan losses will be sufficient to meet actual loan losses.
Non-performing and Potential Problem Loans
The following table sets forth information regarding non-performing assets (in thousands):
                     
  Delinquent and Non-performing Assets 
  At December 31, 
  2009  2008  2007  2006  2005 
Non-accruing loans:                    
Commercial $650  $510  $827  $2,205  $4,389 
Commercial real estate  1,872   2,360   2,825   4,661   6,985 
Agricultural  416   310   481   4,836   2,786 
Residential real estate  2,376   3,365   2,987   3,127   2,615 
Consumer indirect  621   445   278   166   63 
Consumer direct and home equity  887   1,199   677   842   923 
                
Total non-accruing loans  6,822   8,189   8,075   15,837   17,761 
Restructured loans               
Accruing loans contractually past due over 90 days  1,859   7   2   3   276 
                
Total non-performing loans  8,681   8,196   8,077   15,840   18,037 
Foreclosed assets  746   1,007   1,421   1,203   1,099 
Non-accruing commercial-related loans held for sale              577 
Non-performing investment securities  1,015   49          
                
Total non-performing assets $10,442  $9,252  $9,498  $17,043  $19,713 
                
                     
Non-performing loans to total loans  0.69%  0.73%  0.84%  1.71%  1.82%
Non-performing assets to total assets  0.51%  0.48%  0.51%  0.89%  0.97%

- 40 -


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Approximately $3.0 million, or 44.5%, of the $6.8 million in non-accruing loans as of December 31, 2009 were current with respect to payment of principal and interest, but were classified as non-accruing because repayment in full of principal and/or interest was uncertain. For non-accruing loans outstanding as of December 31, 2009, the amount of interest income forgone totaled $388 thousand.
At December 31, 2009, non-performing loans included one commercial relationship totaling $1.9 million which was past due in excess of 90 days but continued to accrue interest. During the first quarter of 2010 the Company received payments for substantially all of the principal and interest due for this relationship and expects to receive the remaining amounts in the near term.
Potential problem loans are loans that are currently performing, but information known about possible credit problems of the borrowers causes management to have concern as to the ability of such borrowers to comply with the present loan payment terms and may result in disclosure of such loans as nonperforming at some time in the future. These loans remain in a performing status due to a variety of factors, including payment history, the value of collateral supporting the credits, and/or personal or government guarantees. Management considers loans classified as substandard, which continue to accrue interest, to be potential problem loans. The Company identified $18.4 million and $20.5 million in loans that continued to accrue interest which were classified as substandard as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
FUNDING ACTIVITIES
Deposits
The following table summarizes the composition of the Company’s subsidiary banksdeposits (dollars in thousands).
                         
  At December 31, 
  2009  2008  2007 
  Amount  Percent  Amount  Percent  Amount  Percent 
Noninterest-bearing demand $324,303   18.6% $292,586   17.9% $286,362   18.2%
Interest-bearing demand  363,698   20.9   344,616   21.1   335,314   21.3 
Savings and money market  368,603   21.1   348,594   21.3   346,639   22.0 
Certificates of deposit < $100,000  512,969   29.5   482,863   29.6   453,140   28.7 
Certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more  173,382   9.9   164,604   10.1   154,516   9.8 
                   
  $1,742,955   100.0% $1,633,263   100.0% $1,575,971   100.0%
                   
The Company offers a variety of deposit products designed to attract and retain customers, with the primary focus on building and expanding long-term relationships. At December 31, 2009, total deposits were $1.743 billion, representing an increase of $109.7 million for the year. Certificates of deposit were 39.4% and 39.7% of total deposits at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Nonpublic deposits represent the largest component of the Company’s funding sources and totaled $1.387 billion and $1.280 billion as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company has managed this segment of funding through a strategy of competitive pricing that minimizes the number of customer relationships that have only a single service high cost deposit account. Nonpublic deposit levels were positively impacted by the expansion of the Company’s branch network in the greater Rochester area, where de novo branches were added in Henrietta and Greece during the third and fourth quarters of 2008, respectively. The Company had no brokered deposits outstanding at December 31, 2009 or 2008.
As an additional source of funding, the Company offers a variety of public deposit products to the many towns, villages, counties and school districts within our market. Public deposits generally range from 20% to 25% of the Company’s total deposits. There is a high degree of seasonality in this component of funding, as the level of deposits varies with the seasonal cash flows for these public customers. The Company maintains the necessary levels of short-term liquid assets to accommodate the seasonality associated with public deposits. As of December 31, 2009, total public deposits were $355.9 million compared to $352.8 million as of December 31, 2008. In general, the number of public relationships remained stable in comparison to prior year.
Short-term Borrowings
Short-term borrowings from the FHLB are used to satisfy funding requirements resulting from daily fluctuations in deposit, loan and investment activities. FHLB borrowings are collateralized by certain investment securities, FHLB stock owned by the Company and certain qualifying loans. At December 31, 2009, short-term borrowings consisted of Federal funds purchased of $9.4 million, $35.1 million of overnight repurchase agreements and a $15.0 million advance from the Federal Reserve’s Term Auction Facility. At December 31, 2008, short-term borrowings consisted of overnight repurchase agreements of $23.5 million.

- 41 -


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The following table summarizes information relating to the Company’s short-term borrowings (dollars in thousands).
             
  At or for the Year Ended December 31, 
  2009  2008  2007 
Year-end balance $59,543  $23,465  $25,643 
Year-end weighted average interest rate  0.59%  0.48%  2.71%
Maximum outstanding at any month-end $85,912  $56,861  $44,944 
Average balance during the year $43,092  $38,028  $29,048 
Average interest rate for the year  0.63%  1.90%  2.97%
Long-term Borrowings
Long-term borrowings totaled $46.8 million at December 31, 2009 and consisted of $30.0 million in FHLB repurchase agreements entered into during 2008, $145 thousand of FHLB amortizing advances and $16.7 million in junior subordinated debentures.
In February 2001, the Company established FISI Statutory Trust I (the “Trust”), which issued 16,200 fixed rate pooled trust preferred securities with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per security. The trust preferred securities represent an interest in the related junior subordinated debentures of the Company, which were purchased by the Trust and have substantially the same payment terms as these trust preferred securities. The subordinated debentures mature in 2031 and are the only assets of the Trust and interest payments from the debentures finance the distributions paid on the trust preferred securities. Distributions on the debentures are payable quarterly at a fixed interest rate equal to 10.20%. The Company incurred $487 thousand in costs related to the issuance that are being amortized over 20 years using the straight-line method. The Trust is accounted for as an unconsolidated subsidiary.
Shareholders’ Equity
Shareholders’ equity increased by $8.0 million in 2009 to $198.3 million at December 31, 2009, primarily due to net income of $14.4 million, partially offset by common and preferred dividends of $8.0 million. For detailed information on shareholders’ equity, see Note 11, Shareholders’ Equity, of the notes to consolidated financial statements.
The Company’s sale of preferred shares under the Treasury’s TARP in December 2005,2008 increased shareholders’ equity by $37.5 million. The Company is evaluating repayment alternatives relative to the TARP funds to determine the most economically beneficial option for the Company and shareholders.
The Company and Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements. At December 31, 2009, both the Company and the Bank exceeded all regulatory requirements. For detailed information on regulatory capital, see Note 10, Regulatory Matters, of the notes to consolidated financial statements.
GOODWILL
The carrying amount of goodwill totaled $37.4 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008. The goodwill relates to the Company’s primary subsidiary and reporting unit, Five Star Bank. The Company performs a goodwill impairment test on an annual basis or more frequently if events and circumstances warrant.
The Company has historically considered total market capitalization as an indicator of fair value based on the trading price of its common stock compared to the carrying value of common equity. However, given the extreme volatility in the stock market during recent years and the impact that the credit crisis and the recession had on the stock market, management concluded that it was more appropriate to consider multiple approaches in assessing its goodwill for potential impairment.
At March 31, 2009, the Company concluded that events had occurred and circumstances had changed which may indicate the existence of potential impairment of goodwill. These indicators included a significant decline in the Company’s stock price and deterioration in the banking industry. The Company utilized a valuation consultant to perform an interim assessment of its goodwill. The assessment included a weighted combination of valuation techniques, which incorporated both income and market based valuation approaches. The income based valuation approach, which carried the most weight, was based on a dividend discount analysis that calculated cash flows on projected financial results assuming a change of control transaction. The significant factors and assumptions used in the discounted dividend analysis included: management’s financial projections, projected dividend stream based on minimum capital requirements, change of control cost synergies, a multiple of terminal price-to-earnings and the discount rate used to calculate the present value of future cash flows. The valuation also included market based valuation approaches, which included application of median pricing multiples from recent actual acquisitions of companies of similar size, as well as, application of change of control premiums to trading value. The valuation resulted in a fair value that exceeded the carrying value of common equity by greater than 10%. Based primarily on the results of this valuation, management concluded that no impairment of goodwill existed.

- 42 -


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The Company continued to monitor the valuation analysis and key assumptions that drove the valuation throughout the remainder of 2009, including as of September 30, the annual evaluation date. The Company also considered the improvement in its financial performance, as well as improved market and industry conditions in general, which occurred subsequent to the March 31, 2009 goodwill impairment analysis. Based on its ongoing evaluation and assessments, the Company concluded no impairment of goodwill existed during and as of the year ended December 31, 2009.
Declines in the market value of the Company’s publicly traded stock price or declines in the Company’s ability to generate future cash flows may increase the potential that goodwill recorded on the Company’s consolidated statement of financial condition be designated as impaired and that the Company may incur a goodwill write-down in the future.

- 43 -


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND DECEMBER 31, 2008
Net Interest Income
Net interest income in the consolidated statements of operations (which excludes the taxable equivalent adjustment) was $72.3 million in 2009 compared to $65.3 million in 2008. The taxable equivalent adjustments (the adjustments to bring tax-exempt interest to a level that would yield the same after-tax income had that income been subject to a taxation using a 34% tax rate) of $2.7 million and $4.3 million for 2009 and 2008, respectively, resulted in fully taxable equivalent net interest income of $75.0 million in 2009 and $69.6 million in 2008.
Net interest income is the primary source of the Corporation’s revenue. Net interest income is the difference between interest income on interest-earning assets, such as loans and investment securities, and the interest expense on interest-bearing deposits and other borrowings used to fund interest-earning and other assets or activities. Net interest income is affected by changes in interest rates and by the amount and composition of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as the sensitivity of the balance sheet to changes in interest rates, including characteristics such as the fixed or variable nature of the financial instruments, contractual maturities and repricing frequencies.
Interest rate spread and net interest margin are utilized to measure and explain changes in net interest income. Interest rate spread is the difference between the yield on earning assets and the rate paid for interest-bearing liabilities that fund those assets. The net interest margin is expressed as the percentage of net interest income to average earning assets. The net interest margin exceeds the interest rate spread because noninterest-bearing sources of funds (“net free funds”), principally noninterest-bearing demand deposits and stockholders’ equity, also support earning assets. To compare tax-exempt asset yields to taxable yields, the yield on tax-exempt investment securities is computed on a taxable equivalent basis. Net interest income, interest rate spread, and net interest margin are discussed on a taxable equivalent basis.
Taxable equivalent net interest income of $75.0 million for 2009 was $5.3 million or 8% higher than 2008. The increase in taxable equivalent net interest income was a combination of favorable volume variances (as balance sheet changes in both volume and mix increased taxable equivalent net interest income by $2.6 million) and favorable interest rate changes (as the impact of changes in the interest rate environment and product pricing increased taxable equivalent net interest income by $2.7 million). The change in mix and volume of earning assets increased taxable equivalent interest income by $4.8 million, while the change in volume and composition of interest-bearing liabilities decreased interest expense by $2.2 million, for a net favorable volume impact of $2.6 million on taxable equivalent net interest income. Rate changes on earning assets reduced interest income by $10.8 million, while changes in rates on interest-bearing liabilities lowered interest expense by $13.5 million, for a net favorable rate impact of $2.7 million.
The net interest margin for 2009 was 4.04%, compared to 3.93% in 2008. The 11 basis point improvement in net interest margin was attributable to a 30 basis point increase in interest rate spread (the net of a 90 basis point decrease in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities and a 60 basis decrease in the yield on earning assets), partially offset by a 19 basis point lower contribution from net free funds (primarily attributable to lower rates on interest-bearing liabilities reducing the relative value of noninterest-bearing deposits and other net free funds).
While unchanged during 2009, the Federal Reserve lowered interest rates seven times (for a total interest rate reduction of 400 basis points) during 2008. At December 31, 2009, the Federal Funds rate was 0.25%, unchanged from December 31, 2008.
For 2009, the yield on average earning assets of 5.23% was 60 basis points lower than 2008. Loan yields also decreased 60 basis points (to 6.01%). Commercial loans in particular, down 97 basis points, experienced lower yields given the repricing of adjustable rate loans and competitive pricing pressures in a low interest rate environment. The yield on securities and short-term investments was down 84 basis points to 4.00%, also impacted by the lower interest rate environment and prepayment speeds of mortgage-related investment securities purchased at a premium. Overall, earning asset rate changes reduced interest income by $10.8 million.
The cost of average interest-bearing liabilities of 1.46% in 2009 was 90 basis points lower than 2008. The average cost of interest-bearing deposits was 1.33% in 2009, 87 basis points lower than 2008, reflecting the lower rate environment, mitigated by a focus on product pricing to retain balances. The cost of wholesale funding (comprised of short-term borrowings and long-term borrowings) decreased 118 basis points to 3.47% for 2009, with short-term borrowings down 127 basis points and long-term borrowings down 52 basis points. The interest-bearing liability rate changes resulted in $13.6 million lower interest expense.
Average interest-earning assets of $1.857 billion in 2009 were $84.7 million or 5% higher than 2008. Average investment securities decreased $111.9 million as a result of mortgage-related investment securities sales and maturities. Average loans increased $184.9 million or 18%, with a $68.6 million increase in commercial loans and a $128.4 million increase in consumer loans, offset by a $12.1 million decrease in residential real-estate loans.
Average interest-bearing liabilities of $1.525 billion in 2009 were up $98.1 million or 7% versus 2008, attributable to higher average deposit balances. On average, interest-bearing deposits grew $99.8 million, while average noninterest-bearing demand deposits (a principal component of net free funds) increased by $13.4 million. Average wholesale funding decreased $1.7 million, the net of $5.1 million increase and $6.8 million decrease in short-term and long-term borrowings, respectively.

- 44 -


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The following tables present, for the periods indicated, information regarding: (i) the average balance sheet; (ii) the amount of interest income from interest-earning assets and the resulting annualized yields (tax-exempt yields have been adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis using the applicable Federal tax rate in each year); (iii) the amount of interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities and the resulting annualized rates; (iv) net interest income; (v) net interest rate spread; (vi) net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets (“net interest margin”); and (vii) the ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities. Investment securities are at amortized cost for both held to maturity and available for sale securities. Loans include net unearned income, net deferred loan fees and costs and non-accruing loans. Dollar amounts are shown in thousands.
                                     
  Years ended December 31, 
  2009  2008  2007 
  Average      Average  Average      Average  Average      Average 
  Balance  Interest  Rate  Balance  Interest  Rate  Balance  Interest  Rate 
Interest-earning assets:
                                    
Federal funds sold and other interest-earning deposits $37,214  $82   0.22% $26,568  $619   2.33% $31,756  $1,662   5.23%
Investment securities:                                    
Taxable  454,552   16,466   3.62   487,687   21,882   4.49   557,035   25,414   4.56 
Tax-exempt  155,054   7,920   5.11   233,864   13,065   5.59   254,083   14,343   5.65 
                            
Total investment securities  609,606   24,386   4.00   721,551   34,947   4.84   811,118   39,757   4.90 
Loans held for sale  1,899   95   5.00   821   51   6.23   770   54   6.99 
Loans:                                    
Commercial  184,269   8,667   4.70   147,015   9,141   6.22   117,784   9,728   8.26 
Commercial real estate  284,603   17,882   6.28   250,387   17,086   6.82   246,396   18,230   7.40 
Agricultural  42,126   2,373   5.63   45,035   3,126   6.94   53,356   4,351   8.16 
Residential real estate  159,156   9,605   6.04   171,262   10,710   6.25   165,226   10,815   6.55 
Consumer indirect  313,239   21,838   6.97   185,197   13,098   7.07   118,152   8,067   6.83 
Consumer direct and home equity  224,720   12,246   5.45   224,343   14,462   6.45   236,910   17,315   7.31 
                            
Total loans  1,208,113   72,611   6.01   1,023,239   67,623   6.61   937,824   68,506   7.30 
                            
Total interest-earning assets  1,856,832   97,174   5.23   1,772,179   103,240   5.83   1,781,468   109,979   6.17 
                               
Less: Allowance for loan losses  20,355           16,287           16,587         
Other noninterest-earning assets  197,439           149,453           142,156         
                                  
Total assets $2,033,916          $1,905,345          $1,907,037         
                                  
                                     
Interest-bearing liabilities:
                                    
Deposits:                                    
Interest-bearing demand $365,873   772   0.21  $347,702   3,246   0.93  $338,326   5,760   1.70 
Savings and money market  383,697   1,090   0.28   369,926   3,773   1.02   346,131   5,863   1.69 
Certificates of deposit  685,259   17,228   2.51   617,381   22,330   3.62   672,239   31,091   4.63 
                            
Total interest-bearing deposits  1,434,829   19,090   1.33   1,335,009   29,349   2.20   1,356,696   42,714   3.15 
Short-term borrowings  43,092   270   0.63   38,028   721   1.90   29,048   864   2.97 
Long-term borrowings  46,913   2,857   6.09   53,687   3,547   6.61   51,561   3,561   6.91 
                            
Total interest-bearing liabilities  1,524,834   22,217   1.46   1,426,724   33,617   2.36   1,437,305   47,139   3.28 
                               
Noninterest-bearing deposits  293,852           280,467           266,239         
Other liabilities  20,890           15,249           17,966         
Shareholders’ equity  194,340           182,905           185,527         
                                  
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $2,033,916          $1,905,345          $1,907,037         
                                  
Net interest income (tax-equivalent)     $74,957          $69,623          $62,840     
                                  
Interest rate spread          3.77%          3.47%          2.89%
                                  
Net earning assets $331,998          $345,455          $344,163         
                                  
Net interest margin (tax-equivalent)          4.04%          3.93%          3.53%
                                  
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities  121.77%          124.21%          123.95%        
                                  

- 45 -


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Rate /Volume Analysis
The following table presents, on a tax equivalent basis, the relative contribution of changes in volumes and changes in rates to changes in net interest income for the periods indicated. The change in interest not solely due to changes in volume or rate has been allocated in proportion to the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each (in thousands):
                         
  December 31, 2009 vs. 2008  December 31, 2008 vs. 2007 
  Increase/(Decrease)      Increase/(Decrease)    
  Due to Change in  Total Net  Due to Change in  Total Net 
  Average  Average  Increase  Average  Average  Increase 
  Volume  Rate  (Decrease)  Volume  Rate  (Decrease) 
Interest-earning assets:
                        
Federal funds sold and other interest-earning deposits $179  $(716) $(537) $(238) $(805) $(1,043)
Investment securities:                        
Taxable  (1,412)  (4,004)  (5,416)  (3,118)  (414)  (3,532)
Tax-exempt  (4,102)  (1,043)  (5,145)  (1,131)  (147)  (1,278)
                       
Total investment securities  (4,977)  (5,584)  (10,561)  (4,343)  (467)  (4,810)
Loans held for sale  56   (12)  44   4   (7)  (3)
Loans:                        
Commercial  2,028   (2,502)  (474)  2,115   (2,702)  (587)
Commercial real estate  2,218   (1,422)  796   291   (1,435)  (1,144)
Agricultural  (192)  (561)  (753)  (627)  (598)  (1,225)
Residential real estate  (740)  (365)  (1,105)  387   (492)  (105)
Consumer indirect  8,930   (190)  8,740   4,732   299   5,031 
Consumer direct and home equity  24   (2,240)  (2,216)  (885)  (1,968)  (2,853)
                       
Total loans  11,481   (6,493)  4,988   5,949   (6,832)  (883)
                       
Total interest-earning assets  4,772   (10,838)  (6,066)  (570)  (6,169)  (6,739)
                       
                         
Interest-bearing liabilities:
                        
Deposits:                        
Interest-bearing demand  162   (2,636)  (2,474)  156   (2,670)  (2,514)
Savings and money market  135   (2,818)  (2,683)  379   (2,469)  (2,090)
Certificates of deposit  2,257   (7,359)  (5,102)  (2,386)  (6,375)  (8,761)
                       
Total interest-bearing deposits  2,056   (12,315)  (10,259)  (673)  (12,692)  (13,365)
Short-term borrowings  85   (536)  (451)  222   (365)  (143)
Long-term borrowings  (426)  (264)  (690)  144   (158)  (14)
                       
Total interest-bearing liabilities  2,177   (13,577)  (11,400)  (345)  (13,177)  (13,522)
                   
  
Change in net interest income $2,595  $2,739  $5,334  $(225) $7,008  $6,783 
                   

- 46 -


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses totaled $7.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, versus $6.6 million for 2008. The increase in the provision was due to increased net charge-offs and increases in loan portfolio outstandings during 2009. See the “Analysis on Allowance for Loan Losses” and “Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses” sections for further discussion.
Noninterest Income (Loss)
Noninterest income was $18.8 million for 2009. Core fee-based revenues (defined as service charges on deposit accounts, ATM and debit fees, and broker-dealer fees and commissions) totaled $14.7 million for 2009, down $571 thousand or 4% from $15.3 million for 2008. Net mortgage banking income was $2.0 million for 2009, compared to $1.0 million in 2008, an increase of $1.0 million from 2008, primarily attributable to higher secondary mortgage production experienced during 2009.
The following table summarizes the Company’s noninterest income (loss) for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
             
  2009  2008  2007 
Service charges on deposits $10,065  $10,497  $10,932 
ATM and debit card  3,610   3,313   2,883 
Loan servicing  1,308   664   928 
Company owned life insurance  1,096   563   1,255 
Broker-dealer fees and commissions  1,022   1,458   1,396 
Net gain on sale of loans held for sale  699   339   779 
Net gain on disposal of investment securities  3,429   288   207 
Impairment charges on investment securities  (4,666)  (68,215)   
Net gain on sale of other assets  180   305   102 
Other  2,052   2,010   2,198 
          
Total noninterest income (loss) $18,795  $(48,778) $20,680 
          
Service charges on deposits were $10.1 million, $432 thousand or 4% lower than 2008. The decrease was primarily attributable to lower nonsufficient funds (down $505 thousand to $8.3 million), offset by an increase in other service charges of (up $73 thousand to $1.8 million).
ATM and debit card income was $3.6 million for 2009, an increase of $297 thousand or 9%, compared to 2008, as the increased popularity of electronic banking and transaction processing has resulted in higher ATM and debit card point-of-sale usage fees.
Loan servicing income represents fees earned for servicing mortgage loans sold to third parties, net of amortization expense and impairment losses, if any, associated with capitalized mortgage servicing assets. Loan servicing income increased $644 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to 2008, mainly from an increase in the sold and serviced residential real estate portfolio and a recovery in the fair value of capitalized mortgage servicing assets.
The Company invested $20.0 million in company owned life insurance during the third quarter of 2008, resulting in the $533 thousand increase when comparing company owned life insurance income for the year ended December 31, 2009 to 2008.
Broker-dealer fees and commissions were down $436 thousand or 30%, compared to 2008. Broker-dealer fees and commissions fluctuate mainly due to sales volume, which has declined during 2009 as a result of current market and economic conditions.
Net gain on sale of loans held for sale increased $360 thousand compared to the prior year, due primarily to higher gains on sales and related income resulting from increased volumes. Secondary mortgage production was $89.0 million for 2009, compared to $28.5 million for 2008. In addition, the 2008 income includes $104 thousand in net gains from the sale of student loans. The Company exited the student loan business in 2008.
The $3.4 million net gain on disposal of investment securities for 2009 is comprised of $6.8 million in gross gains, primarily from securities issued by U.S. government sponsored agencies, and $3.4 million in gross losses on sales of privately issued whole loan CMOs and auction rate securities. The $288 thousand net gain on disposal of investment securities for 2008 is comprised of $291 thousand in gross gains and $3 thousand in gross losses.
The $4.7 million of impairment charges on investment securities for 2009 is comprised of valuation write-downs of $2.4 million on pooled TPS and $2.3 million on privately issued whole loan CMOs. The $68.2 million of impairment charges on investment securities for 2008 is comprised of valuation write-downs of $30.0 million on pooled TPS, $5.9 million on privately issued whole loan CMOs and $32.3 million on auction-rate securities.

- 47 -


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense for 2009 was $62.8 million, an increase of $5.3 million or 9% over 2008. FDIC assessments increased $3.0 million, salaries and employee benefits increased $2.2 million, and collectively all remaining noninterest expense categories were up $142 thousand compared to 2008. The following table summarizes the Company’s noninterest expense for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
             
  2009  2008  2007 
Salaries and employee benefits $33,634  $31,437  $33,175 
Occupancy and equipment  11,062   10,502   9,903 
FDIC assessments  3,651   674   289 
Professional services  2,524   2,141   2,080 
Computer and data processing  2,340   2,433   2,126 
Supplies and postage  1,846   1,800   1,662 
Advertising and promotions  949   1,453   1,402 
Other  6,771   7,021   6,791 
          
Total noninterest expense $62,777  $57,461  $57,428 
          
Salaries and employee benefits (which includes salary-related expenses and fringe benefit expenses) was $33.6 million for 2009, up $2.2 million or 7% from 2008. Average full-time equivalent employees (“FTEs”) were 586 for 2009, down 4% from 610 for 2008. Salary-related expenses were relatively unchanged at $25.2 million for 2009 and $25.1 million for 2008, a result of fewer FTEs offset by higher incentives and commissions. Fringe benefit expenses increased $2.1 million or 34%, primarily from higher pension and post-retirement benefit costs.
Compared to 2008, occupancy and equipment expenses of $11.1 million were up $560 thousand or 5%, primarily a result of additional expenses related to the opening of two new branches at the end of 2008, combined with increased software maintenance costs.
FDIC assessments, comprised mostly of deposit insurance paid to the FDIC, increased $3.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The increases resulted from a combination of an increase in deposit levels subject to insurance premiums, higher FDIC insurance premium rates during 2009 and a $923 thousand special assessment during the second quarter of 2009, coupled with a reductionutilization of approximately $451 thousand in carryforward credits that reduced expense during the first nine months of 2008.
Professional services expense of $2.5 million increased $383 thousand or 18%, primarily due to higher legal and other professional consultant costs associated with asset quality issuesloan workouts and regulatory matters.other corporate activities and projects.
Advertising and promotions expense of $949 thousand and other noninterest expense of $6.8 million, collectively, were down $754 thousand or 9%, reflecting efforts to control selected discretionary expenses.
The efficiency ratio for the year ended December 31, 2009 was 65.52% compared with 64.07% for 2008. The diminished efficiency ratio is reflective of noninterest expense increasing by larger margin than the higher level of net interest income. The efficiency ratio equals noninterest expense less other real estate expense and amortization of intangible assets as a percentage of net revenue, defined as the sum of tax-equivalent net interest income and noninterest income before net gains and impairment charges on investment securities and proceeds from company owned life insurance included in income.
Income Taxes
The Company recognized income tax expense of $6.1 million for 2009 compared to an income tax benefit of $21.3 million for 2008. The change in income tax was primarily due to the Company having pre-tax income for 2009 versus a pre-tax loss for 2008. The Company’s effective tax rates were 29.8% in 2009 and (44.9)% in 2008. Effective tax rates are affected by income and expense items that are not subject to Federal or state taxation. The Company’s income tax provision reflects the impact of such items, including tax-exempt interest income from municipal securities, tax-exempt earnings on bank-owned life insurance and the effect of certain state tax credits. The unusual 2008 effective tax benefit rate results from the relationship between the size of the favorable permanent differences and pre-tax loss.

- 48 -


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND DECEMBER 31, 2007
Net Interest Income
Net interest income, the principal source of the Company’s earnings, was $59.5$65.3 million in 2006 down from $67.52008 compared to $58.1 million in 2005 and $75.4 million in 2004.2007. Net interest margin was 3.55%3.93% for the year ended December 31, 2008, an increase of 40 basis points from 3.53% for the same period last year. The 40 basis point increase in net interest margin was partially offset by a decline in average interest-earning assets of $9.3 million to $1.772 billion as of December 31, 2008 compared to $1.781 billion for the same period last year, which resulted in the $7.3 million increase in net interest income. The increase in net interest margin resulted from the average cost of funds decreasing 74 basis points while average earning asset yield decreased only 34 basis points. In 2008, earning asset yield benefited from a higher percentage of earning assets being deployed in higher yielding loan assets.
Average total loans for the year ended December 31, 2008 were $1.023 billion, up $85.4 million when compared with $937.8 million for the same period last year. The higher average consumer indirect and commercial portfolios more than offset the drop in the average consumer and home equity portfolio. Average total investment securities (excluding federal funds sold and other interest-bearing deposits) totaled $721.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, down from $811.1 million for the same period last year.
The Company’s yield on average earning assets was 5.83% for 2008, down 34 basis points from 6.17% in 2007. The Company’s loan portfolio yield was 6.61% for 2008, down 69 basis points from 2007, and the tax-equivalent investment yield was 4.84% for 2008, down 6 basis points from 2007.
Total average interest-bearing deposits were $1.335 billion for the year ended December 31, 2008, down slightly from $1.357 billion for the same period in 2007. Fewer certificates of deposit, including brokered certificates of deposit, contributed to the decline. Average short-term borrowings amounted to $38.0 million for 2008, up from $29.0 million for 2007. Average long-term borrowings totaled $53.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, up slightly from $51.6 million for the same period last year.
The rate on interest-bearing liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2008 was 2.36%, 3.65%a decrease of 92 basis points from 2007. The decrease primarily resulted from lower general market interest rates experienced in 2008 and 3.90%a favorable shift to lower cost funding sources.
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses totaled $6.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, versus $116 thousand for 2007. The increase in the provision was primarily due to growth in the consumer indirect loan portfolio and a $1.7 million increase in net charge-offs during 2008. See the “Analysis on Allowance for Loan Losses” and “Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses” sections for further discussion.
Noninterest Income
Service charges on deposits declined to $10.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared with $10.9 million for the same period in 2007, a result of fewer customer overdrafts and related service fees.
ATM and debit card income totaled $3.3 million and $2.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 20052008 and 2004,2007, respectively. TheATM and debit card income has increased as a result of higher ATM usage fees and an increase in customer utilization of debit card point-of-sale transactions. Broker-dealer fees and commissions increased due to slightly higher sales volumes.
Loan servicing income in 2008 was adversely impacted by a $343 thousand impairment charge on capitalized mortgage servicing assets that resulted from an increase in prepayment assumptions used to value capitalized mortgage servicing assets, a direct result of the decline in mortgage interest rates experienced in 2008. The impairment charge recorded in 2007 totaled $18 thousand.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, company owned life insurance included $1.1 million in income from the receipt of insurance proceeds. The Company invested $20.0 million in company owned life insurance during the third quarter of 2008, which would have resulted in an increase in income compared to prior year absent the death benefit proceeds received in 2007.
Net gain on sale of loans held for sale declined compared to prior year due primarily to lower student loan sale volumes, which resulted from increased competition and changing market conditions for student loans as the Company exited the business in 2008. For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, student loan sale net gains were $104 thousand and $478 thousand, respectively.
The net gain on sale of other assets includes gains and losses on premises, equipment, other real estate (“ORE”) and repossessed assets and the increase in the net gain for 2008 was favorable in comparison to 2007.
The impairment charges on investment securities totaled $68.2 million in 2008. See the “Investing Activities” section for further discussion.

- 49 -


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Noninterest Expense
For the year ended December 31, 2008, salaries and benefits totaled $31.4 million, down $1.7 million from the prior year. The factors that contributed to the decline were as follows: a reduction in annual incentive compensation as certain senior management incentive targets contingent on 2008 financial results were not achieved; an increase in the amount of salaries and wages allocated to deferred direct loan origination costs due to higher loan origination volumes; and lastly, a reduction in full-time equivalent employees (“FTEs”) to 600 as of year-end 2008, a decrease of 21 FTEs compared to prior year-end.
The Company experienced a 6% increase in occupancy and equipment expenses in 2008 to $10.5 million, compared to $9.9 million in 2007. The increase was partly a result of the expansion of the branch network in the Rochester area, as de novo branches were added in Henrietta and Greece during the third and fourth quarters of 2008, respectively. Also contributing to the increase in 2008 were technology upgrades and higher service contract related expenses associated with equipment and computer software.
FDIC assessments, comprised mostly of deposit insurance paid to the FDIC, increased $385 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2008. The Company had carryforward credits which it utilized to reduce deposit insurance expense during 2007 and a portion of 2008. These carryforward credits were fully utilized during the first nine months of 2008.
Professional fees and services increased 3% for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to 2007, primarily due to costs incurred in 2008 associated with valuation of the investment securities portfolio.
Computer and data processing costs increased 14% in 2008 compared to the prior year, primarily due to higher debit card data transaction processing expense due to increased customer point-of-sale transaction volumes.
Supplies and postage increased 8% for the year ended December 31, 2008 versus 2007, primarily the result of higher postage costs.
Other expenses increased 3% or $230 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2008. A $557 thousand prepayment charge on borrowed funds was partly offset by lower levels of commercial-related loan workout expenses and other real estate expense (“ORE”) expenses in 2008.
The efficiency ratio for the year ended December 31, 2008 was 64.07% compared with 68.77% for 2007. The improved efficiency ratio is reflective of the higher level of net interest income resultedand relatively flat noninterest expense. The efficiency ratio equals noninterest expense less other real estate expense and amortization of intangible assets as a percentage of net revenue, defined as the sum of tax-equivalent net interest income and noninterest income before net gains and impairment charges on investment securities, proceeds from lowercompany owned life insurance included in income and net gain on sale of trust relationships.
Income Taxes
The income tax (benefit) expense amounted to $(21.3) million and $4.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The fluctuation in income tax expense corresponded in general with the level of net income before tax. The Company’s effective tax rates were (44.9)% in 2008 and 22.6% in 2007. Effective tax rates are affected by income and expense items that are not subject to Federal or state taxation. The Company’s income tax provision reflects the impact of such items, including tax-exempt interest income from municipal securities, tax-exempt earnings on bank-owned life insurance and the effect of certain state tax credits. The unusual 2008 effective tax benefit rate results from the relationship between the size of the favorable permanent differences and pre-tax loss.

- 50 -


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
2009 FOURTH QUARTER RESULTS
For the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company’s net income was $5.4 million or $0.42 per diluted share, compared with net income of $3.4 million or $0.23 per diluted share for the third quarter of 2009 and a net loss of $3.1 million or ($0.33) per diluted share for the fourth quarter of 2008.
Net interest income for the fourth quarter of 2009 was $19.2 million, an increase of $1.9 million or 11% over the fourth quarter of 2008. Net interest margin was 4.06% for the fourth quarter of 2009, a decrease of 1 basis point from the fourth quarter of 2008. An improved mix of earning asset levels alongassets, primarily driven by growth in the loan portfolio, coupled with a narrowedsignificant decline in funding costs were the primary factors driving the performance of net interest income and margin.
EffectiveNoninterest income for the quarter ended December 3, 2005,31, 2009 was $5.2 million, compared with a noninterest loss of $25.1 million in 2008. Other-than-temporary impairment charges (“OTTI”) on investment securities included in noninterest income amounted to $565 thousand during the fourth quarter of 2009. Absent the OTTI charges and net gains from security sales, noninterest income increased 11% for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2009, from the same period in 2008.
Noninterest expense for the fourth quarter of 2009 was $15.1 million, a decrease of $277 thousand from the fourth quarter of 2008. A one-time prepayment charge on borrowed funds of $557 thousand incurred during the fourth quarter of 2008 was most significant cause for the decrease.
Total assets at December 31, 2009 were $2.062 billion, down $75.8 million from $2.138 billion at September 30, 2009. Total loans were $1.264 billion and represented 61% of total assets at December 31, 2009, compared to $1.259 billion and 59% of total assets at September 30, 2009. Total deposits decreased $54.2 million to $1.743 billion at December 31, 2009, versus $1.797 billion at September 30, 2009, due to seasonal reductions in public deposits. Total investment securities were $620.1 million at December 31, 2009, down $50.7 million from $670.8 million at September 30, 2009.
Net charge-offs decreased by $128 thousand from the fourth quarter of 2008 to $1.1 million, or 0.35% of average loans. The provision for loan losses was $1.1 million for the quarter, compared with $2.6 million in the same quarter a year ago. At December 31, 2009, non-performing loans totaled $8.7 million, or 0.69% of total loans, an increase of $2.9 million from the third quarter. Included in non-performing loans at December 31, 2009 was one commercial relationship totaling $1.9 million which was past due in excess of 90 days but continued to accrue interest. The Company received a payment of principal and interest of approximately $1.7 million during January 2010 and expects to receive a substantial portion of the remaining principal and interest before the end of the first quarter of 2010. At December 31, 2009, non-performing assets totaled $10.4 million, which included $1.0 million in non-performing investment securities on which interest payments are no longer being accrued and any payments received are being applied to principal.

- 51 -


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The objective of maintaining adequate liquidity is to assure the ability of the Company mergedto meet its subsidiary banks intofinancial obligations. These obligations include the New York State-chartered Firstwithdrawal of deposits on demand or at their contractual maturity, the repayment of matured borrowings, the ability to fund new and existing loan commitments and the ability to take advantage of new business opportunities. The Company achieves liquidity by maintaining a strong base of core customer funds, maturing short-term assets, its ability to sell or pledge securities, lines-of-credit, and access to the financial and capital markets.
Liquidity for the Bank is managed through the monitoring of anticipated changes in loans, the investment portfolio, core deposits and wholesale funds. The strength of the Bank’s liquidity position is a result of its base of core customer deposits. These core deposits are supplemented by wholesale funding sources that include credit lines with the other banking institutions, the FHLB and the FRB.
The primary sources of liquidity for FII are dividends from the Bank and access to financial and capital markets. Dividends from the Bank are limited by various regulatory requirements related to capital adequacy and earnings trends. The Bank relies on cash flows from operations, core deposits, borrowings and short-term liquid assets. FSIS relies on cash flows from operations and funds from FII when necessary.
The Company’s cash and cash equivalents were $43.0 million as of December 31, 2009, down from $55.2 million as of December 31, 2008. The Company’s net cash provided by operating activities totaled $22.3 million and the principal source of operating activity cash flow was net income adjusted for noncash income and expense items and changes in other assets and other liabilities. Net cash used in investing activities totaled $172.2 million, which included net loan origination funding of $165.7 million and net securities transactions of $6.2 million. Net cash provided by financing activities of $137.7 million was attributed to the $109.7 million and $36.1 million increase in deposits and borrowings, respectively, partially offset by $7.5 million in cash paid for dividends.
Contractual Obligations and Other Commitments
The following table summarizes the maturities of various contractual obligations and other commitments (in thousands):
                     
  At December 31, 2009 
  Within 1  Over 1 to 3  Over 3 to 5  Over 5    
  year  years  Years  years  Total 
Certificates of deposit (1)
 $526,549  $140,489  $18,968  $345  $686,351 
Long-term borrowings  20,080   10,065      16,702   46,847 
Operating leases  1,135   2,098   1,757   4,386   9,376 
Supplemental executive retirement plans  92   282   282   754   1,410 
Limited partnership investments(2)
  772   1,543   772      3,087 
Commitments to extend credit(3)
  316,688            316,688 
Standby letters of credit(3)
  6,887            6,887 
(1)Includes the maturity of certificates of deposit amounting to $100 thousand or more as follows: $75.3 million in three months or less; $29.5 million between three months and six months; $51.1 million between six months and one year; and $17.5 million over one year.
(2)The Company has committed to capital investments in several limited partnerships of up to $5.6 million. As of December 31, 2009, the Company has contributed $2.5 million to the partnerships, including $383 thousand during 2009.
(3)The Company does not expect all of the commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit to be funded. Thus, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent the Company’s future cash requirements.
With the exception of the Company’s obligations in connection with its trust preferred securities and in connection with its irrevocable loan commitments, the Company had no other off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on its financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors. For additional information on off-balance sheet arrangements, see Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 9, Commitments and Contingencies, in the notes to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
The Company’s sale of preferred shares under the Treasury’s TARP in December 2008 increased shareholders’ equity by $37.5 million. The Company is evaluating repayment alternatives relative to the TARP funds to determine the most economically beneficial option for the Company and shareholders.

- 52 -


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Security Yields and Maturities Schedule
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the amortized cost (“Cost”), weighted average yields (“Yield”) and contractual maturities of the Company’s debt securities portfolio as of December 31, 2009. Actual maturities may differ from the contractual maturities presented, because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay certain investments. No tax-equivalent adjustments were made to the weighted average yields (in thousands).
                                         
                  Due after five       
  Due in one year  Due from one to  years through  Due after ten    
  or less  five years  ten years  years  Total 
  Cost  Yield  Cost  Yield  Cost  Yield  Cost  Yield  Cost  Yield 
Available for sale debt securities:
                                        
U.S. Government agencies and government-sponsored enterprises $   % $84,017   2.02% $30,935   1.62% $19,612   0.85% $134,564   1.76%
State and political subdivisions  23,537   3.51   49,856   3.61   7,419   3.36         80,812   3.56 
Mortgage-backed securities  29,004   3.79   36,060   4.11   13,799   3.79   282,268   3.67   361,131   3.73 
Asset-backed securities                    1,295   1.86   1,295   1.86 
                                    
   52,541   3.66   169,933   2.93   52,153   2.44   303,175   3.66   577,802   3.33 
                                         
Held to maturity debt securities:
                                        
State and political subdivisions  30,238   2.56   7,361   4.09   1,542   4.85   432   5.42   39,573   2.97 
                                    
  $82,779   3.26% $177,294   2.98% $53,695   2.51% $303,607   3.66% $617,375   3.31%
                                    
Contractual Loan Maturity Schedule
The following table summarizes the contractual maturities of the Company’s loan portfolio at December 31, 2009. Loans, net of deferred loan origination costs, include principal amortization and non-accruing loans. Demand loans having no stated schedule of repayment or maturity and overdrafts are reported as due in one year or less (in thousands).
                 
  Due in less  Due from one  Due after five    
  than one year  to five years  years  Total 
Commercial $135,251  $48,741  $2,394  $186,386 
Commercial real estate  82,474   150,377   76,022   308,873 
Agricultural  21,002   15,826   5,044   41,872 
Residential real estate  32,201   68,027   43,987   144,215 
Consumer indirect  123,829   220,453   8,329   352,611 
Consumer direct and home equity  63,931   119,031   47,087   230,049 
             
  
Total loans $458,688  $622,455  $182,863  $1,264,006 
             
                 
Loans maturing after one year:                
With a predetermined interest rate     $399,133  $70,498  $469,631 
With a floating or adjustable rate      223,322   112,365   335,687 
              
  
Total loans maturing after one year     $622,455  $182,863  $805,318 
              

- 53 -


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Capital Resources
The FRB has adopted a system using risk-based capital guidelines to evaluate the capital adequacy of bank holding companies on a consolidated basis. The guidelines require a minimum Tier Bank & Trust (“FTB”)1 leverage ratio of 4.00%, which was then renamed Five Star Bank (“FSB”)a minimum Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.00% and a minimum total risk-based capital ratio of 8.00%. The consolidation activities have improved operational efficienciesfollowing table reflects the ratios and have contributed to lower noninterest expense in 2006 when compared with 2005 and 2004. The Company also sold the Burke Group, Inc (“BGI”) subsidiary during 2005 to focus on its core community banking business. The results of BGI have been reported separately as a discontinued operation in the consolidated statements of income and the loss on discontinued operation totaled $2.5 million and $450,000 for 2005 and 2004, respectively. In addition, the Company sold its trust relationships during 2006 and recognized a $1.4 million gain on the sale.their components (in thousands):
         
  2009  2008 
Total shareholders’ equity $198,294  $190,300 
Less: Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale, net of tax  1,655   3,463 
Unrecognized net periodic pension & postretirement benefits (costs), net of tax  (5,357)  (7,476)
Disallowed goodwill and other intangible assets  37,369   37,650 
Disallowed deferred tax assets  17,214   22,437 
Plus: Qualifying trust preferred securities  16,200   16,200 
       
Tier 1 capital $163,613  $150,426 
       
Adjusted average total assets (for leverage capital purposes) $2,054,699  $1,869,111 
       
         
Tier 1 leverage ratio (Tier 1 capital to adjusted average total assets)  7.96%  8.05%
  
Total Tier 1 capital $163,613  $150,426 
Plus: Qualifying allowance for loan losses  17,153   15,936 
       
         
Total risk-based capital $180,766  $166,362 
       
         
Net risk-weighted assets $1,368,653  $1,272,028 
       
         
Tier 1 capital ratio (Tier 1 capital to net risk-weighted assets)  11.95%  11.83%
         
Total risk-based capital ratio (Total risk-based capital to net risk-weighted assets)  13.21%  13.08%
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIESESTIMATES
The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United StatesGAAP and are consistent with predominant practices in the financial services industry. Application of critical accounting policies, which are those policies that management believes are the most important to the Company’s financial position and results, requires management to make estimates, assumptions, and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes and are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements. Future changes in information

28


may affect these estimates, assumptions and judgments, which, in turn, may affect amounts reported in the financial statements.
The Company has numerous accounting policies, of which the most significant are presented in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the notes to consolidated financial statements. These policies, along with the disclosures presented in the other financial statement notes and in this discussion, provide information on how significant assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses are reported in the consolidated financial statements and how those reported amounts are determined. Based on the sensitivity of financial statement amounts to the methods, assumptions, and estimates underlying those amounts, management has determined that the accounting policies with respect to the allowance for loan losses, valuation of goodwill and goodwilldeferred tax assets, the valuation of securities and determination of OTTI, and accounting for defined benefit plans require particularly subjective or complex judgments important to the Company’s financial position and results of operations, and, as such, are considered to be critical accounting policies as discussed below. These estimates and assumptions are based on management’s best estimates and judgment and are evaluated on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors, including the current economic environment. The Company adjusts these estimates and assumptions when facts and circumstances dictate. Illiquid credit markets and volatile equity have combined with declines in consumer spending to increase the uncertainty inherent in these estimates and assumptions. As future events cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ significantly from the Company’s estimates.
Adequacy of the Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses is considered a critical accounting estimate because it requires significant judgment and the use of subjective measurements including management’s assessment of the internal risk classifications of loans, changes in the nature of the loan portfolio, industry concentrations and the impact of current local, regional and national economic factors on the quality of the loan portfolio. Changes in these estimates and assumptions are reasonably possible and may have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, results of operations or liquidity.

- 54 -


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
A commercial-related loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that a creditor will be unable to collect all amounts of principal and interest under the original terms of the agreement and all loans restructured in a troubled debt restructuring. Accordingly, the Company evaluates impaired commercial-related loans individually, primarily based on the net realizable value of the collateral, as the majority of the Company’s impaired loans are collateral dependent.
Loans, including impaired loans, are generally classified as non-accruing if they are past due as to maturity or payment of principal or interest for a period of more than 90 days, unless such loans are well-collateralized and in the process of collection. Loans that are on a current payment status or past due less than 90 days may also be classified as non-accruing if repayment in full of principal and/or interest is uncertain.
For additional discussion related to the Company’s accounting policies for the allowance for loan losses, see the sections titled “Analysis of Allowance for Loan Losses” and “Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses” in Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation”Operations” and Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the notes to consolidated financial statements.
Valuation of Goodwill
StatementGoodwill represents the excess of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” prescribescost over the accounting for goodwillfair value of the net assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill and intangible assets subsequentacquired in a business combination and determined to initial recognition. The provisions of SFAS No. 142 discontinue the amortization of goodwill and intangible assets withhave an indefinite lives.useful life are not amortized. Instead, these assets are subject to at least an annual impairment review and more frequently if certain impairment indicators are in evidence. Goodwill impairment testing is performed at the segment (or “reporting unit”) level. Currently, the Company’s goodwill is evaluated at the entity level as there is only one material reporting unit. Fair value of the reporting unit is considered based on total market capitalization or discounted cash flow projections using various estimates and assumptions, including discount rate, tangible equity ratio and change in control premium. Changes in the estimates and assumptions used to evaluate impairmentare reasonably possible and may have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, results of operations or liquidity. During 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company evaluated goodwill for impairment using a discounted cash flow analysis and determined no impairment existed. For additional discussion related to the Company’s accounting policy for goodwill and other intangible assets, see Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the notes to consolidated financial statements.
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
Overview
At December 31, 2006 the Company had total assetsValuation of $1.908 billion, a decrease of 6% from $2.022 billion at December 31, 2005. Loans at December 31, 2006 were $926.5 million, down $65.8 million, or 6.6%, when compared to $992.3 million at December 31, 2005. The decline in loans was primarily attributed to loan payments outpacing new loan originations and the consequences of the 2005 loan sale. The Company’s strategy is to rebuild a balanced quality loan portfolio, and loan originations slowed due to more stringent underwriting requirements, firm pricing disciplines and a highly competitive marketplace for quality loans. Total deposits amounted to $1.618 billion and $1.717 billion at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Contributing to the decline in deposits were fewer certificates of deposit, including brokered certificates of deposit, as the Company actively managed to lower the level of these higher cost deposits. Other deposit categories declined from deposit outflows associated with the effects of the 2005 loan sale and from higher-rate competitor products. At December 31, 2006, total borrowed funds and junior subordinated debentures were $87.2 million compared to $115.2 million at December 31, 2005. The Company funded the reduction in borrowings with cash available from the decline in loans experienced in 2006. Book value per common share was $14.53 and $13.60 at December 31,

29


2006 and 2005, respectively. At December 31, 2006 the Company’s total shareholders’ equity was $182.4 million compared to $171.8 million a year earlier.
Lending ActivitiesDeferred Tax Assets
Loan Portfolio Composition
Loans outstanding, excluding loans held for sale and including net unearned income and net deferred fees and costs, are summarized as follows at December 31:
                     
(Dollars in thousands) 2006  2005  2004  2003  2002 
 
Commercial $105,806  $116,444  $203,178  $248,313  $262,630 
Commercial real estate  243,966   264,727   343,532   369,712   332,134 
Agricultural  56,808   75,018   195,185   235,199   233,769 
Residential real estate  268,446   274,487   259,055   246,621   244,927 
Consumer and home equity  251,456   261,645   251,455   240,591   241,461 
                
                     
Total loans  926,482   992,321   1,252,405   1,340,436   1,314,921 
                     
Allowance for loan losses  (17,048)  (20,231)  (39,186)  (29,064)  (21,660)
                
                     
Total loans, net $909,434  $972,090  $1,213,219  $1,311,372  $1,293,261 
                
Total loans declined 6.6% or $65.8 million to $926.5 million at December 31, 2006 from $992.3 million at December 31, 2005. The decline in loans was primarily attributed to loan payments outpacing new loan originations and the consequences of the 2005 loan sale. The Company’s strategy is to rebuild a balanced quality loan portfolio, and loan originations slowed due to more stringent underwriting requirements, firm pricing disciplines and a highly competitive marketplace for quality loans.
Commercial loans decreased $10.6 million or 9.1%, while commercial real estate loans decreased by $20.8 million or 7.8%. At December 31, 2006, commercial loans totaled $105.8 million, representing 11.4% of total loans, and commercial real estate loans totaled $244.0 million, representing 26.4% of total loans. At December 31, 2006, agricultural loans, which include agricultural real estate loans, totaled $56.8 million or 6.1% of the total loan portfolio, down $18.2 million from 2005. Collectively, commercial-related loans comprised $49.6 million or 75.3% of the decline in total loans.
As of December 31, 2006, residential real estate loans totaled $268.4 million, a $6.1 million or 2.2% decrease from $274.5 million at December 31, 2005. Residential real estate loans represented 29.0% of the total loan portfolio at the end of 2006 compared to 27.7% at the end of 2005. The Company’s residential mortgage volume slowed as a result of the rising interest rate environment and the increasingly competitive marketplace for mortgage loans.
The Company also offers a broad rangedetermination of consumer loan products. Consumer and home equity lines of credit totaled $251.5 and $261.6 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Consumer and home equity lines of credit represented 27.1% of the total loan portfolio at year-end 2006. The mix in the Company’s consumer portfolio changed during 2006 as the Company focuseddeferred tax expense or benefit is based on expanding its indirect automobile lending program. At December 31, 2006, the Company’s indirect consumer loans were $106.4 million, an increase of $21.2 million or 24.9% from $85.2 million at December 31, 2005. While the Company increased its indirect consumer loan portfolio, declines in consumer direct and home equity lines of credit resulted from an increasingly competitive marketplace and more than offset the increase in indirect consumer loans.
Loans Held for Sale and Commercial-Related Loan Sale Results
During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company transferred $169.0 million in commercial-related loans to held for sale, at an estimated fair value less costs to sell of $132.3 million. As a result, $36.7 million in commercial-related charge-offs were recorded. Subsequent to the transfer, the Company decided not to proceed with the sale of $613,000 of these commercial-related loans held for sale and returned the loans to portfolio at the lower of cost or fair value. In the second half of 2005, the Company realized a net gain of $9.4 million on the ultimate sale or settlement of commercial-related loans held for sale.

30


Loans held for sale (not included in the previous loan portfolio composition table) totaled $992,000 at December 31, 2006, all of which were residential real estate loans. Loans held for sale (not included in the previous loan portfolio composition table) totaled $1.3 million as of December 31, 2005, comprised of nonaccruing commercial-related loans (including commercial real estate and agricultural loans) of $577,000 and residential real estate loans of $676,000.
The Company also sells certain qualifying newly originated and refinanced residential real estate mortgages on the secondary market. The sold and serviced residential real estate loan portfolio decreased to $355.2 million at December 31, 2006 from $377.6 million at December 31, 2005. The Company’s residential mortgage volume slowed as a result of the rising interest rate environment and the increasingly competitive marketplace for mortgage loans.
Nonaccruing Loans and Nonperforming Assets
The following table sets forth information regarding nonaccruing loans and other nonperforming assets at December 31:
                     
(Dollars in thousands) 2006  2005  2004  2003  2002 
 
Nonaccruing loans (1)                    
Commercial $2,205  $4,389  $20,576  $12,983  $12,760 
Commercial real estate  4,661   6,985   15,954   11,745   8,407 
Agricultural  4,836   2,786   13,165   18,870   8,739 
Residential real estate  3,602   3,096   1,733   2,496   1,065 
Consumer and home equity  533   505   518   578   915 
                
                     
Total nonaccruing loans  15,837   17,761   51,946   46,672   31,886 
                     
Restructured loans           3,069   4,129 
                     
Accruing loans 90 days or more delinquent  3   276   2,018   1,709   1,091 
                
                     
Total nonperforming loans  15,840   18,037   53,964   51,450   37,106 
                     
Other real estate owned (“ORE”)  1,203   1,099   1,196   653   1,251 
                
                     
Total nonperforming loans and other real estate owned  17,043   19,136   55,160   52,103   38,357 
                     
Nonaccruing commercial-related loans held for sale     577          
                
                     
Total nonperforming assets $17,043  $19,713  $55,160  $52,103  $38,357 
                
                     
Total nonperforming loans to total loans (2)  1.71%  1.82%  4.31%  3.84%  2.82%
                     
Total nonperforming loans and ORE to total loans and ORE (2)  1.84%  1.93%  4.40%  3.89%  2.91%
                     
Total nonperforming assets to total assets  0.89%  0.97%  2.56%  2.40%  1.82%
(1)Although loans are generally placed on nonaccruing status when they become 90 days or more past due they may be placed on nonaccruing status earlier if they have been identified by the Company as presenting uncertainty with respect to the collectibility of interest or principal. Loans past due 90 days or more may remain on accruing status if they are both well secured and in the process of collection.
(2)Ratios exclude nonaccruing commercial-related loans held for sale from nonperforming loans and exclude loans held for sale from total loans.
Nonperforming loans (excluding nonaccruing commercial-related loans held for sale) decreased to $15.8 million at December 31, 2006 from $18.0 million at December 31, 2005. Nonaccruing commercial-related loans

31


decreased in 2006 and totaled $11.7 million and $14.2 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005. The Company also experienced declines in accruing loans 90 days or more delinquent and nonaccruing commercial-related loans held for sale during 2006. Offsetting those declines was a $104,000 increase in ORE to $1.2 million at December 31, 2006 compared to $1.1 million at December 31, 2005.
The following table details nonaccruing commercial-related loan activity for the year ended December 31:
         
(Dollars in thousands) 2006  2005 
Nonaccruing commercial-related loans at beginning of year $14,160  $49,695 
Additions  12,002   27,839 
Payments  (8,783)  (11,708)
Charge-offs  (2,075)  (46,920)
Returned to accruing status  (2,300)  (3,745)
Transferred to other real estate or repossessed assets  (1,302)  (1,001)
       
         
Nonaccruing commercial-related loans at end of year $11,702  $14,160 
       
During 2006, the Company received $8.8 million in payments on nonaccruing commercial-related loans and $2.3 million of nonaccruing commercial-related loans were returned to accruing status. In addition, the Company charged-off $2.1 million in nonaccruing commercial-related loans during 2006.
Approximately $8.6 million or 54.2% of the $15.8 million in nonaccruing loans at December 31, 2006 are current with respect to payment of principal and interest. Although these loans are current, the Company classified the loans as nonaccruing because reasonable doubt exists with respect to the future collectibility of principal and interest in accordance with the original contractual terms. During the year ended December 31, 2006 the amount of interest income forgone on nonaccruing loans totaled $1.5 million.
Potential problem loans are loans that are currently performing, but information known about possible credit problems of the borrowers causes management to have concern as to the ability of such borrowers to comply with the present loan payment terms and may result in disclosure of such loans as nonperforming at some time in the future. These loans remain in a performing status due to a variety of factors, including payment history, the value of collateral supporting the credits, and/or personal or government guarantees. Management considers loans classified as substandard, which continue to accrue interest, to be potential problem loans. The Company identified $16.2 million and $23.2 million in loans that continued to accrue interest which were classified as substandard as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
The following table summarizes loan delinquencies (excluding past due nonaccruing loans) as of December 31:
                 
  2006  2005 
      Accruing Loans      Accruing Loans 
  60-89  90 Days  60-89  90 Days 
(Dollars in thousands) Days  or More  Days  or More 
 
Commercial $7  $  $1,205  $266 
Commercial real estate  30      560   9 
Agriculture        25    
Residential real estate  29      412    
Consumer and home equity  119   3   201   1 
             
                 
  $185  $3  $2,403  $276 
             

32


Analysis of Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses represents the estimated amount of probable credit losses inherent in the Company’s loan portfolio. The Company performs periodic, systematic reviews of the Bank’s loan portfolio to estimate probable losses in the respective loan portfolios. In addition, the Company regularly evaluates prevailing economic and business conditions, industry concentrations, changes in the size and characteristics of the portfolio and other pertinent factors. The process used by the Company to determine the overall allowance for loan losses is based on this analysis. Based on this analysis the Company believes the allowance for loan losses is adequate at December 31, 2006.
Assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses involves substantial uncertainties and is based upon management’s evaluation of the amounts required to meet estimated charge-offs in the loan portfolio after weighing various factors. The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is subject to ongoing management review. While management evaluates currently available information in establishing the allowance for loan losses, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the evaluations. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review a financial institution’s allowance for loan losses and carrying amounts of other real estate owned. Such agencies may require the financial institution to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.
assets and liabilities that generate temporary differences. The following table sets forth an analysis of the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the years ended December 31:
                     
(Dollars in thousands) 2006  2005  2004  2003  2002 
 
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of year $20,231  $39,186  $29,064  $21,660  $19,074 
                     
Addition resulting from acquisitions              174 
                     
Charge-offs (1):                    
Commercial  1,195   12,980   4,486   8,891   1,771 
Commercial real estate  501   15,397   1,779   2,953   944 
Agricultural  379   18,543   2,519   1,876   106 
Residential real estate  335   104   318   215   98 
Consumer and home equity  1,789   2,262   1,695   2,107   1,499 
                
Total charge-offs  4,199   49,286   10,797   16,042   4,418 
                     
Recoveries:                    
Commercial  1,417   864   598   525   210 
Commercial real estate  132   280   103   35   69 
Agricultural  389   57   39   3   36 
Residential real estate  73   11   43   11   67 
Consumer and home equity  847   587   460   346   329 
                
Total recoveries  2,858   1,799   1,243   920   711 
                     
Net charge-offs  1,341   47,487   9,554   15,122   3,707 
                     
(Credit) provision for loan losses  (1,842)  28,532   19,676   22,526   6,119 
                
                     
Allowance for loan losses at end of year $17,048  $20,231  $39,186  $29,064  $21,660 
                
                     
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans outstanding during the year  0.14%  4.27%  0.74%  1.11%  0.30%
                     
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to total loans (2)  1.84%  2.04%  3.13%  2.17%  1.65%
                     
Ratio of allowance for loans losses to nonperforming loans (2)  108%  112%  73%  56%  58%
(1)Included in charge-offs for the year ended December 31, 2005 are $36.7 million in write-downs on commercial-related loans.
(2)Ratios exclude nonaccruing loans held for sale from nonperforming loans and loans held for sale from total loans.

33


At December 31, 2006, the Company’s allowance for loan losses totaled $17.0 million, a decrease of $3.2 million from the previous year-end. The allowance for loan losses represents the estimated probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio based on the Company’s comprehensive assessment. This assessment resulted in a credit for loan losses of $1.8 million for 2006. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans was 1.84% and 2.04% at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The ratio of allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans decreased to 108% at December 31, 2006 versus 112% at December 31, 2005.
Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses
The following table sets forth the allocation of the allowance for loan losses by loan category at the dates indicated. The allocation is made for analytical purposes and is not necessarily indicative of the categories in which actual losses may occur. The total allowance is available to absorb losses from any segment of the loan portfolio.
                                         
  At December 31:
  2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
  Amount Percent Amount Percent Amount Percent Amount Percent Amount Percent
  of of Loans of of Loans of of Loans of of Loans of of Loans
  Allowance in Each Allowance in Each Allowance in Each Allowance in Each Allowance in Each
  for Category for Category for Category for Category for Category
  Loan to Total Loan to Total Loan to Total Loan to Total Loan to Total
(Dollars in thousands) Losses Loans Losses Loans Losses Loans Losses Loans Losses Loans
   
Commercial $2,443   11.4% $4,098   11.7% $11,420   16.2% $7,739   18.5% $5,321   20.0%
Commercial real estate  4,458   26.4   6,564   26.7   9,297   27.4   5,354   27.6   4,725   25.3 
Agricultural  1,887   6.1   2,187   7.5   8,197   15.6   6,078   17.6   3,711   17.7 
Residential real estate  2,818   29.0   2,019   27.7   1,468   20.7   1,447   18.4   1,414   18.6 
Consumer and home equity  3,512   27.1   2,769   26.4   2,122   20.1   2,161   17.9   2,007   18.4 
Unallocated  1,930      2,594      6,682      6,285      4,482    
   
                                         
Total $17,048   100.0% $20,231   100.0% $39,186   100.0% $29,064   100.0% $21,660   100.0%
   
The Company’s methodology in the estimation of the allowance for loan losses includes the following broad areas:
1.Impaired commercial, commercial real estate, agricultural and agricultural real estate loans, in excess of $100,000 are reviewed individually and assigned a specific loss allowance, if considered necessary, in accordance with SFAS No. 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan — an amendment of FASB Statements No. 5 and 15”.
2.The remaining portfolios of commercial, commercial real estate, agricultural and agricultural real estate loans are segmented into the following loan classification categories: uncriticized or pass, special mention, and substandard. The substandard category of loans greater than $100,000 is then further divided into two groupings based on an assessment of the individual loan’s collateralization levels (i.e. under collateralized or adequately collateralized). Loans under collateralized by less than 5% of the outstanding loan balance are treated the same as adequately collateralized loans.
3.If applicable, substandard loans where the collateral deficiency is greater than 5% are split into two categories based on outstanding loan balances (i.e.$3.0 million or more and less than $3.0 million). The inherent risk of loss on the loans in each of these groupings is estimated based upon historical net loan charge-off considerations, review of the amount of under collateralization of the loans in the respective groupings, as well as other qualitative factors.
4.Uncriticized loans, special mention loans, adequately collateralized substandard loans and all substandard loans under $100,000 are assigned allowance allocations based on historical net loan charge-off experience for each of the respective loan categories, supplemented with additional reserve amounts, if considered necessary, based upon qualitative factors. These qualitative factors include the levels and trends in delinquencies, nonaccruing loans, and risk ratings; trends in volume and terms of loans; effects of changes in lending policy; experience, ability, and depth of management; national and local economic conditions, and concentrations of credit, among others.

34


5.The consumer loan portfolio is segmented into six types of loans: residential real estate, home equity lines of credit, consumer direct, consumer indirect, overdrafts and personal lines of credit. Each of those categories is subdivided into categories based on delinquency status, either 90 days and over past due or under 90 days. Allowance allocations on these types of loans are based on the average loss experience over the last three years for each subdivision of delinquency status supplemented with qualitative factors containing the same elements as described above.
6.A further component of the allowance is the unallocated portion which takes into consideration the inherent risk of loss in the portfolio not identified in the other three categories and includes such elements as risks associated with variances in the rate of historical loss experiences, information risks associated with the dependence upon timely and accurate risk ratings on loans, and risks associated with the dependence on collateral valuation techniques. This category has been reduced from the previous year due to a reduction in these risks primarily resulting from the 2005 problem loan sale discussed previously as well as the positive credit quality trends in 2006.
While management evaluates currently available information in establishing the allowance for loan losses, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the evaluations. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review a financial institution’s allowance for loan losses and carrying amounts of other real estate owned. Such agencies may require the financial institution to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.
Loan Maturity and Repricing Schedule
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the contractual maturity or repricing of loans in the portfolio as of December 31, 2006. Demand loans having no stated schedule of repayment or maturity and overdrafts are reported as due in one year or less. Adjustable and floating-rate loans are included in the period in which interest rates are next scheduled to adjust rather than the period in which they contractually mature, and fixed-rate loans are included in the period in which the final contractual repayment is due.
                 
      One       
  Within  Through  After    
  One  Five  Five    
(Dollars in thousands) Year  Years  Years  Total 
 
Commercial $45,030  $34,131  $26,645  $105,806 
Commercial real estate  3,976   23,382   216,608   243,966 
Agricultural  7,472   17,441   31,895   56,808 
Residential real estate  4,502   16,417   247,527   268,446 
Consumer and home equity  7,673   107,542   136,241   251,456 
             
                 
Total loans $68,653  $198,913  $658,916  $926,482 
             
 
Loans maturing after one year:                
With a predetermined interest rate     $164,586  $285,013     
With a floating or adjustable rate      34,327   373,903     
               
                 
      $198,913  $658,916     
               

35


Investing Activities
Investment Portfolio Composition
The Company’s total investment security portfolio decreased $57.9 million to $775.5 million as of December 31, 2006 compared to $833.4 million as of December 31, 2005. Further detail regarding the Company’s investment portfolio follows.
U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprise (“GSE”) Securities.At December 31, 2006, the available for sale GSE securities portfolio totaled $231.8 million. The portfolio consisted of approximately $129.7 million, or 56%, of callable securities at December 31, 2006. At December 31, 2006 this category of securities also included $99.0 million of structured notes, the majority of which were step callable agency debt issues. The step callable bonds step-up in rate at specified intervals and are periodically callable by the issuer. At December 31, 2006, the current average coupon of the structured notes was 4.13% and adjust on average to 6.56% within five years. However, under current market conditions these notes are likely to be called. At December 31, 2005, the available for sale GSE securities portfolio totaled $251.9 million.
State and Municipal Obligations. At December 31, 2006, the portfolio of state and municipal obligations totaled $238.7 million, of which $198.3 million was classified as available for sale. At that date, $40.4 million was classified as held to maturity, with a fair value of $40.4 million. At December 31, 2005, the portfolio of state and municipal obligations totaled $262.9 million, of which $220.3 million was classified as available for sale. At that date, $42.6 million was classified as held to maturity, with a fair value of $42.9 million.
Mortgage-Backed Pass-through Securities (“MBS”), Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (“CMO”) and Other Asset-Backed Securities (“ABS”). MBS, CMO and ABS securities, all of which were classified as available for sale, totaled $300.0 million and $317.6 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The portfolio was comprised of $189.4 million of MBS, $107.4 million of CMO and $3.2 million of other ABS securities at December 31, 2006. The MBSs were by U.S. government agencies or GSEs (GNMA, FNMA or FHLMC). Approximately 92% of the MBSs were in fixed rate securities that were most frequently formed with mortgages having an original balloon payment of five or seven years. The adjustable rate agency mortgage-backed securities portfolio is principally indexed to the one-year Treasury bill. The CMO portfolio consisted primarily of fixed and variable rate government issues and fixed rate privately issued AAA rated securities. The ABS securities are primarily Student Loan Marketing Association (“SLMA”) floaters, which are variable rate securities backed by student loans. At December 31, 2005, the portfolio consisted of $234.3 million of MBSs, $77.4 million of CMOs and $5.9 million of other ABS securities.
Corporate Bonds and Other. At December 31, 2006, the Company held $3.9 million in corporate bonds and other securities. At December 31, 2005, the Company held no corporate bonds and other securities. The Company’s investment policy limits investments in corporate bonds to no more than 10% of total investments and to bonds rated as Baa or better by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. or BBB or better by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services at the time of purchase.
Equity Securities. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, available for sale equity securities totaled $1.1 million and $1.0 million, respectively.
Security Yields and Maturities Schedule
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the carrying values, weighted average yields and contractual maturities of the Company’s debt securities portfolio as of December 31, 2006. Actual maturities may differ from the contractual maturities presented, because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay certain investments. No tax-equivalent adjustments were made to the weighted average yields.

36


                                         
          More than One More than Five    
  One Year or Less Year to Five Years Years to Ten Years After Ten Years Total
      Weighted     Weighted     Weighted     Weighted     Weighted
  Amortized Average Amortized Average Amortized Average Amortized Average Amortized Average
(Dollars in thousands) Cost Yield Cost Yield Cost Yield Cost Yield Cost Yield
 
Available for sale:                                        
GSE $55,198   3.67% $78,611   3.94% $31,886   5.71% $70,029   6.04% $235,724   4.74%
MBS, CMO and ABS  923   3.74   128,519   4.29   65,531   4.32   113,168   4.96   308,141   4.54 
State and municipal obligations  41,036   3.39   135,004   3.44   20,146   3.94   2,242   3.52   198,428   3.48 
Corporate and other                    3,913   4.31   3,913    
   
                                         
Total available for sale debt securities $97,157   3.55% $342,134   3.87% $117,563   4.63% $189,352   5.33% $746,206   4.32%
   
                                         
Held to maturity:                                        
State and municipal obligations $30,440   3.92% $6,832   4.29% $2,198   4.92% $918   5.27% $40,388   4.07%
   
                                         
Total held to maturity debt securities $30,440   3.92% $6,832   4.29% $2,198   4.92% $918   5.27% $40,388   4.07%
   
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment on a quarterly basis, or as economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability ofnet deferred tax assets assumes that the Company will be able to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of timegenerate sufficient to allow for recovery in fair value. The net unrealized losses on securities available for sale amounted to $11.1 million and $10.3 million as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The unrealized losses present do not reflect deterioration in the credit worthiness of the issuing securities and resulted primarily from fluctuations in market interest rates. The Company intends to hold these securities until their fair value recovers to their amortized cost, therefore management has determined that the securities that were in an unrealized loss position at December 31, 2006 and 2005 represent only temporary declines in fair value.
Funding Activities
Deposits
The Bank offers a broad array of deposit products including noninterest-bearing demand, interest-bearing demand, savings and money market accounts and certificates of deposit. At December 31, 2006, total deposits were $1.618 billion in comparison to $1.717 billion at December 31, 2005. The decline was primarily due to lower nonpublic deposits attributed to the timing of rate campaigns, the loss of deposits associated with the effects of the 2005 commercial-related loan sale, and fewer certificates of deposits, including brokered certificates of deposit, as the Company actively managed to lower the level of these higher cost deposits. Public deposits increased slightly to $352.6 million at December 31, 2006 from $351.3 million at December 31, 2005.
The Company considers all deposits to be “core” except certificates of deposit over $100,000. Core deposits amounted to $1.422 billion or 87.9% of total deposits at December 31, 2006 compared to $1.517 billion or 88.4% of total deposits at December 31, 2005. The core deposit base consisted almost exclusively of in-market accounts. Core deposits are supplemented with certificates of deposit over $100,000, which amounted to $195.4 million and $199.8 million as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Company also utilized brokered certificates of deposit as a funding source. Brokered certificates of deposit included in certificates of deposit over $100,000 totaled $16.7 million and $31.5 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The decline in brokered certificates of deposit resulted from the Company utilizing cash available from the decline in loans to repay the maturing brokered deposits.

37


The daily average balances, percentage composition and weighted average rates paid on deposits are presented below for each of the years ended December 31:
                                     
(Dollars in Thousands) 2006 2005 2004
      Percent         Percent         Percent  
      of Total Weighted     of Total Weighted     of Total Weighted
  Average Average Average Average Average Average Average Average Average
  Balance Deposits Rate Balance Deposits Rate Balance Deposits Rate
 
Interest-bearing demand $379,434   23.2%  1.77% $390,610   21.7%  1.26% $396,558   21.5%  0.73%
Savings and money market  333,155   20.4   1.30   393,439   21.9   0.95   424,013   22.9   0.66 
Certificates of deposit under $100,000  460,210   28.1   3.80   510,981   28.5   2.84   527,298   28.5   2.45 
Certificates of deposit over $100,000  204,148   12.5   4.39   226,304   12.6   3.13   233,155   12.6   2.57 
Noninterest-bearing demand  258,416   15.8      275,069   15.3      267,721   14.5    
   
                                     
Total deposits $1,635,363   100.0%  2.29% $1,796,403   100.0%  1.68% $1,848,745   100.0%  1.33%
   
The following table indicates the amount of the Company’s certificates of deposit by time remaining until maturity as of December 31, 2006:
                     
  3 Months  Over 3 To  Over 6 To  Over 12    
(Dollars in thousands) Or Less  6 Months  12 Months  Months  Total 
 
Certificates of deposit less than $100,000 $80,566  $84,102  $238,896  $70,757  $474,321 
 
Certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more  111,386   17,126   49,353   17,502   195,367 
                
Total certificates of deposit $191,952  $101,228  $288,249  $88,259  $669,688 
                
Borrowings
Outstanding borrowings are as follows at December 31:
         
      
(Dollars in thousands) 2006  2005 
 
Short-term borrowings:        
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements $32,310  $20,106 
       
         
Long-term borrowings:        
FHLB advances $38,187  $53,391 
Other     25,000 
       
         
Total long-term borrowings $38,187  $78,391 
       
Total short-term borrowings increased $12.2 million to $32.3 million at December 31, 2006 from $20.1 million at December 31, 2005 due to an increase in securities sold under repurchase agreements. Total long-term borrowings decreased to $38.2 million at December 31, 2006 from $78.4 million at December 31, 2005. The Company funded the reduction in borrowings with cash available from the decline in loans experienced in 2006.
The Company also has a credit agreement with another commercial bank and pledged the stock of FSB as collateral for the credit facility. The credit agreement included a $25.0 million term loan facility and a $5.0 million revolving loan facility. At June 30, 2005, the Company was in default of an affirmative financial covenant in the credit agreement and reclassified the borrowing from long-term to short-term. The bank waived the event of default at June 30, 2005. As of September 30, 2005, FII and the bank agreed to modify the covenants in the agreement. FII complied with the modified covenants, therefore the term loan was classified as a long-term

38


borrowing at December 31, 2005. In addition, the interest rate and maturity of the term loan facility were modified. The amended and restated term loan required monthly payments of interest only at a variable interest rate of London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 2.00% through the third quarter of 2006. During October 2006, FII repaid the $25.0 million term loan. The debt was scheduled for repayment in equal annual installments of $6.25 million beginning in December 2007. The $5.0 million revolving loan was also modified to accrue interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 1.75% and is scheduled to mature April 2007. There were no advances outstanding on the revolving loan during the year ended December 31, 2006 or December 31, 2005.
Junior Subordinated Debentures
In February 2001, the Company issued $16.7 million of junior subordinated debentures to a statutory trust subsidiary. The junior subordinated debentures have a fixed interest rate equal to 10.20% and mature in 30 years. The Company incurred $487,000 in costs related to the issuance that are being amortized over 20 years using the straight-line method. The statutory trust subsidiary then participated in the issuance of trust preferred securities of similar terms and maturity. As of December 31, 2003, the Company deconsolidated the subsidiary trust, which had issued trust preferred securities, and replaced the presentation of such instruments with the Company’s junior subordinated debentures issued to the subsidiary trust. Such presentation reflects the adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46 R”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.”
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006 AND 2005
Overview
For the year ended December 31, 2006, income from continuing operations was $17.4 million or $1.40 per diluted share, up from $4.6 million or $0.28 per diluted share from last year. For the year ended December 31, 2006, net income was $17.4 million or $1.40 per diluted share compared with net income of $2.2 million or $0.06 per diluted share for the prior year. The primary factor for the improved 2006 results was a $1.8 million credit for loan losses in 2006 compared with a $28.5 million provision for loan losses in 2005. The Company also reduced noninterest expense by $5.9 million in 2006 compared with 2005. The improved risk profile of the Company’s loan portfolio contributed to the credit for loan losses. Lower noninterest expense resulted from improved operating efficiencies from the consolidation of FII’s subsidiary banks in December 2005, coupled with a reduction in costs associated with asset quality issues and regulatory matters. Net interest income, the principal source of the Company’s earnings, was $59.5 million in 2006 down from $67.5 million in 2005. Net interest margin was 3.55% and 3.65% for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The decline in net interest income resulted from lower earning asset levels along with a narrowed net interest margin. Return on average common equity was 10.02% for 2006 compared to 0.43% in 2005.
Average Statements of Financial Condition and Net Interest Analysis
The following table sets forth certain information relating to the Company’s consolidated statements of financial condition and reflects the average yields earned on interest-earning assets, as well as the average rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities for the years indicated. Such yields and rates were derived by dividing interest income or expense by the average balances of interest-earning assets or interest-bearing liabilities, respectively, for the years shown. Tax-equivalent adjustments have been made. All average balances are average daily balances.

39


                                     
  For the years ended December 31:
  2006  2005  2004 
  Average  Interest      Average  Interest      Average  Interest    
  Outstanding  Earned/  Yield/  Outstanding  Earned/  Yield/  Outstanding  Earned/  Yield/ 
(Dollars in thousands) Balance  Paid  Rate  Balance  Paid  Rate  Balance  Paid  Rate 
Interest-earning assets:                                    
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits $36,572  $1,877   5.13% $42,977  $1,476   3.43% $35,245  $448   1.27%
Commercial paper due in less than 90 days  8,285   411   4.97                   
Investment securities (1):                                    
Taxable  559,945   23,897   4.27   545,496   22,200   4.07   475,180   19,343   4.07 
Non-taxable  251,439   13,663   5.43   251,640   13,172   5.23   241,999   12,802   5.29 
                            
Total investment securities  811,384   37,560   4.63   797,136   35,372   4.44   717,179   32,145   4.48 
Loans (2):                                    
Commercial and agricultural  426,408   32,554   7.63   612,987   38,690   6.31   800,133   46,393   5.80 
Residential real estate  271,691   17,090   6.29   264,506   16,808   6.35   248,872   16,555   6.65 
Consumer and home equity  255,081   18,360   7.20   258,459   16,151   6.25   246,327   15,115   6.14 
                            
Total loans  953,180   68,004   7.13   1,135,952   71,649   6.31   1,295,332   78,063   6.03 
Total interest-earning assets  1,809,421   107,852   5.96   1,976,065   108,497   5.49   2,047,756   110,656   5.40 
                                     
Allowance for loan losses  (19,338)          (29,152)          (30,600)        
Other noninterest-earning assets  148,937           169,493           173,193         
                                  
                                     
Total assets $1,939,020          $2,116,406          $2,190,349         
                                  
                                     
Interest-bearing liabilities:                                    
Interest-bearing demand $379,434  $6,705   1.77% $390,610  $4,917   1.26% $396,558  $2,903   0.73%
Savings and money market  333,155   4,320   1.30   393,439   3,733   0.95   424,013   2,812   0.66 
Certificates of deposit  664,358   26,420   3.98   737,285   21,605   2.93   760,453   18,909   2.49 
Short-term borrowings  26,157   571   2.18   24,998   377   1.51   28,237   284   1.01 
Long-term borrowings  67,023   3,860   5.76   82,142   4,035   4.91   95,446   4,132   4.33 
Junior subordinated debentures and trust preferred securities  16,702   1,728   10.35   16,702   1,728   10.35   16,702   1,728   10.35 
                            
Total interest-bearing liabilities  1,486,829   43,604   2.93   1,645,176   36,395   2.21   1,721,409   30,768   1.79 
                            
                                     
Noninterest-bearing demand  258,416           275,069           267,721         
Other noninterest-bearing liabilities  17,638           19,023           15,472         
                                  
Total liabilities  1,762,883           1,939,268           2,004,602         
                                     
Stockholders’ equity (3)  176,137           177,138           185,747         
                                  
                                     
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $1,939,020          $2,116,406          $2,190,349         
                                  
                                     
Net interest income – tax-equivalent      64,248           72,102           79,888     
Less: tax-equivalent adjustment      4,782           4,610           4,481     
                                  
Net interest income     $59,466          $67,492          $75,407     
                                  
                                     
Net interest rate spread          3.03%          3.28%          3.61%
                                  
                                     
Net earning assets $322,592          $330,889          $326,347         
                                  
Net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets (“net interest margin”)          3.55%          3.65%          3.90%
                                  
                                     
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities          121.70%          120.11%          118.96%
                                  
(1)Amounts shown are amortized cost for both held to maturity and available for sale securities. In order to make resultant yields on tax-exempt securities comparable to those on taxable securities and loans, the interest earned from tax-exempt bonds is presented on a tax-equivalent basis.
(2)Includes the average balance and interest earned on loans held for sale. Includes net unearned income and net deferred loan fees and costs. Loans held for sale and nonaccruing loans are included in the average loan totals and payments on nonaccruing loans have been recognized as disclosed in Note 1 of the notes to consolidated financial statements.
(3)Includes unrealized losses on securities available for sale, net of related taxes.

40


Net Interest Income
Net interest income, the principal source of the Company’s earnings, was $59.5 million in 2006, compared to $67.5 million in 2005. Net interest margin was 3.55% for the year ended December 31, 2006, a drop of 10 basis points from 3.65% for the same period last year. The decline in net interest income resulted from a combination of lower earning asset levels, a changed mix of earnings assets and a narrowed net interest margin as the inverted to flat yield curve prevalent for most of 2006 negatively impacted net interest margin.
For the year ended December 31, 2006, average earning assets were $1.809 billion compared with $1.976 billion for the prior year. Average total loans for the year ended December 31, 2006 were $953.2 million, down $182.8 million, or 16.1%, when compared with $1.136 billion for the same period last year. The bulk of the decline in average total loans in 2006 relates to the commercial-related loan sale that occurred during 2005. Average total investment securities (excluding federal funds sold, interest-bearing deposits and commercial paper due in less than 90 days) totaled $811.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, a $14.3 million increase compare to $797.1 million for the same period last year. A portion of the cash available from the decline in loans was redeployed in investment securities.
The overall mix of the Company’s earning assets changed, with loans, which generally have a higher interest yield than investments, representing a lower percentage of earning assets. For the year ended December 31, 2006, loans comprised 52.7% of average earnings assets compared to 57.5% in 2005.
The Company’s yield on average earning assets was 5.96% for 2006, up 47 basis points from 5.49% in 2005. The Company’s loan portfolio yield was 7.13% for 2006, up 82 basis points from 2005, and the tax-equivalent investment yield was 4.63% for 2006, up 19 basis points from 2005.
Total average interest-bearing deposits were $1.377 billion for the year ended December 31, 2006, down 9.5% from $1.521 billion for the same period in 2005. Contributing to the decline in deposits were fewer certificates of deposit, including brokered certificates of deposit. Other consumer deposit categories declined due to deposit outflows associated with the effects of the 2005 loan sale and from higher-rate competitor products. Total average short-term and long-term borrowings were $93.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, down from $107.1 million compared to 2005. The Company actively managed to reduce higher cost borrowings using cash available from the decline in loans.
The rate on interest-bearing liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2006 was 2.93%, an increase of 72 basis points over 2005. The increase primarily resulted from higher deposit interest costs associated with higher general market interest rates.
Rate/Volume Analysis
The following table presents the extent to which changes in interest rates and changes in the volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities have affected the Company’s interest income and interest expense during the periods indicated. Information is provided in each category with respect to: (i) changes attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by current year rate); (ii) changes attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume); and (iii) the net change. The changes attributable to the combined impact of volume and rate have been allocated proportionately to the changes due to volume and the changes due to rate.

41


                         
  For the years ended December 31:
  2006 vs. 2005  2005 vs. 2004 
  Increase/(Decrease)  Total  Increase/(Decrease)  Total 
  Due To:  Increase/  Due To:  Increase/ 
(Dollars in thousands) Volume  Rate  (Decrease)  Volume  Rate  (Decrease) 
Interest-earning assets:                        
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits $(328) $729  $401  $266  $762  $1,028 
Commercial paper due in less than 90 days  411      411          
Investment securities:                        
Taxable  613   1,084   1,697   2,857      2,857 
Non-taxable  (11)  502   491   519   (149)  370 
                   
Total investment securities  602   1,586   2,188   3,376   (149)  3,227 
Loans:                        
Commercial and agricultural  (14,215)  8,079   (6,136)  (11,771)  4,068   (7,703)
Residential real estate  435   (153)  282   1,021   (768)  253 
Consumer and home equity  (243)  2,452   2,209   763   273   1,036 
                   
Total loans  (14,023)  10,378   (3,645)  (9,987)  3,573   (6,414)
                   
                         
Total interest-earning assets $(13,338) $12,693  $(645) $(6,345) $4,186  $(2,159)
                   
                         
Interest-bearing liabilities:                        
Interest-bearing demand $(197) $1,985  $1,788  $(74) $2,088  $2,014 
Savings and money market  (776)  1,363   587   (284)  1,205   921 
Certificates of deposit  (2,887)  7,702   4,815   (686)  3,382   2,696 
Short-term borrowings  25   169   194   (50)  143   93 
Long-term borrowings  (881)  706   (175)  (640)  543   (97)
Junior subordinated debentures and trust preferred securities                  
                   
                         
Total interest-bearing liabilities  (4,716)  11,925   7,209   (1,734)  7,361   5,627 
                   
                         
Net interest income $(8,622) $768  $(7,854) $(4,611) $(3,175) $(7,786)
                   
(Credit) Provision for Loan Losses
The (credit) provision for loan losses represents management’s estimate of the expense necessary to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level representative of probable credit losses inherent in the portfolio. The credit for loan losses totaled $1.8 million in 2006, compared to the provision for loan losses of $28.5 million in 2005. Net loan charge-offs were $1.3 million, or 0.14% of average loans, for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $47.5 million, or 4.27% of average loans for 2005. The 2005 results reflected higher provision for loan losses and net charge-offs as a result of write-downs associated with the decision to sell approximately $169.0 million of commercial-related loans. The credit for loan losses in 2006 was due to overall improving credit quality as well as a decline in the loan portfolio. The ratio of allowance for loan losses to total loans was 1.84% and 2.04% at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The ratio of the allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans was 108% at December 31, 2006 versus 112% at December 31, 2005. See the “Analysis on Allowance for Loan Losses” and “Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses” sections for further discussion.

42


Noninterest Income
The following table presents the major categories of noninterest income for the years ended December 31:
         
(Dollars in thousands) 2006  2005 
 
Service charges on deposits $11,504  $11,586 
ATM and debit card  2,233   1,680 
Financial services group fees and commissions  1,890   2,687 
Mortgage banking revenues  1,194   1,597 
Income from corporate owned life insurance  521   90 
Net gain on sale and call of securities  30   14 
Net gain on sale of student loans held for sale  670   245 
Net gain on sale of commercial-related loans held for sale  82   9,369 
Net loss on sale of premises and equipment  (3)  (321)
Net gain (loss) on sale of other real estate and repossessed assets  90   (9)
Net gain on sale of trust relationships  1,386    
Other  2,314   2,446 
       
         
Total noninterest income $21,911  $29,384 
       
Noninterest income for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 was $21.9 million and $29.4 million, respectively. The majority of the decline was attributed to the net gain of $9.4 million on the sale of commercial-related loans recorded in 2005.
Service charges on deposits are down slightly for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared with 2005. The decline results from the decrease in deposit base, partially offset by a fee increase imposed during 2006.
Automated Teller Machine (“ATM”) and debit card income, which represents fees for foreign ATM usage and income associated with customer debit card purchases, totaled $2.2 million and $1.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. ATM and debit card income has increased from the prior year as a result of an increase in ATM usage fees and more favorable terms on a new debit card service contract.
Financial services group fees and commissions declined $797,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared with the prior year as a result of lower volumes primarily in the broker-dealer function. Included in financial services group fees and commissions are trust fees of $328,000 and $456,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. During 2006, the Bank sold its trust relationships at the end of the third quarter and recorded a gain on sale of $1.4 million.
Mortgage banking revenues, which includes gains and losses from the sale of residential mortgage loans, mortgage servicing income and the amortization and impairment (if any) of mortgage servicing rights, have declined in 2006. The residential mortgage volume has slowed as a result of the rising interest rate environment and the increasingly competitive marketplace for mortgage loans.
Included in noninterest income for year ended December 31, 2006 was $419,000 in income associated with the proceeds from corporate owned life insurance policies received in the second quarter of 2006.
During the third quarter of 2005, the Bank began originating student loans with a forward commitment to sell the student loans to a third-party at a fixed premium on the day of origination. Included in the net gain on sale of student loans held for sale in 2006 was a $253,000 premium received from the third-party as a result of achieved sales volumes. The Bank anticipates lower future origination volumes and net gain on sale due to increased competition and changing market conditions.
The variance in net loss on sale of premises and equipment, when comparing 2006 to 2005, relates primarily to equipment and sign disposals recorded in 2005 as a result of the Company’s reorganization and consolidation of its subsidiary banks into FSB.

43


Net gain (loss) on sale of other real estate and repossessed assets increased for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to 2005, primarily as a result of a $107,000 gain recognized on the sale of a commercial property during the first quarter of 2006.
Noninterest Expense
The following table presents the major categories of noninterest expense for the years ended December 31:
         
(Dollars in thousands) 2006  2005 
 
Salaries and employee benefits $33,563  $34,763 
Occupancy and equipment  9,465   9,022 
Supplies and postage  1,945   2,173 
Amortization of other intangible assets  420   430 
Computer and data processing  1,903   1,930 
Professional fees and services  2,837   5,074 
Other  9,479   12,100 
       
         
Total noninterest expense $59,612  $65,492 
       
Noninterest expense for the year ended December 31, 2006 decreased $5.9 million, or 9.0% to $59.6 million from $65.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. This decline was principally related to operational efficiencies gained from the consolidation of the Company’s subsidiary banks at the end of 2005, the elimination of professional service fees related to last year’s asset quality and regulatory issues, and lower FDIC insurance costs.
For the year ended December 31, 2006, salaries and benefits declined $1.2 million from the year ended December 31, 2005. This decline was principally from reduced staffing levels and lower payroll related taxes and benefit costs. The Company focused on managing staff levels and filling positions vacated through attrition only when necessary. In addition, salaries and benefits included $821,000 of management stock compensation expense (excludes director stock compensation expense) for the year ended December 31, 2006 as a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R). Since SFAS No. 123(R) was adopted effective January 1, 2006, there was no such stock compensation expense included in salaries and benefits in 2005.
The Company has experienced a 4.9% increase in occupancy and equipment expenses when comparing 2006 to 2005. The Company has actively managed to reduce costs and lower overhead, but those efforts were more than offset by rising utility and maintenance costs.
Supplies and postage are down 10.5% for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to 2005. This decline results from efficiencies gained through the consolidation of the Company’s banking charters and ongoing efforts to reduce costs.
Computer and data processing costs are down slightly in 2006 versus 2005.
Professional fees and services have declined 44.1% for the year ended December 31, 2006 compare to 2005, primarily a result of the resolution of asset quality issues and regulatory matters during 2005.
Other expenses decreased 21.7% for the year ended December 31, 2006. The decline in other expenses related primarily to lower FDIC insurance premiums, which declined $1.2 million to $215,000 in 2006 versus $1.4 million in 2005. The Company also experienced a reduction in other operating expenses in 2006, as one-time severance and restructuring costs were incurred during 2005 to merge the Company’s subsidiary banks.
The efficiency ratio for the year ended December 31, 2006 was 69.45% compared with 70.18% for 2005. The improved efficiency ratio is reflective of the lower levels of noninterest expense, partially offset by lower revenues. The efficiency ratio represents noninterest expense less other real estate expense and amortization of intangibles (all from continuing operations) divided by net interest income (tax-equivalent) plus other noninterest income less gain on sale of securities, net gain on sale of commercial-related loans held for sale and gain on sale of trust relationships (all from continuing operations).

44


Income Tax Expense (Benefit) From Continuing Operations
The income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations provided for federal and New York State income taxes, which amounted to expense of $6.2 million and a benefit of $1.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The fluctuation in income tax expense corresponded in general with taxable income levels for each year. The effective tax rate for 2006 was 26.5%, compared to (61.9)% in 2005. The 2005 effective tax rate was due to the relationship between the size of the favorable permanent differences and pre-tax income from continuing operations, which resulted in the unusual effective tax benefit rate.
The current and deferred tax provision was calculated based on estimates and assumptions that could differ from(after consideration of historical taxable income as well as tax planning strategies). If these estimates and related assumptions change, the actual results reflectedCompany may be required to record valuation allowances against its deferred tax assets resulting in additional income tax returns filed during the subsequent year. Adjustments based on filed returns are recorded when identified, which is generally before or during the third quarter of the subsequent year.
The amount of income taxes paid is subject to ongoing audits by federal and state tax authorities, which often result in proposed assessments. Our estimate for the potential outcome for any uncertain tax issue is highly judgmental. We believe we have adequately provided for any reasonably foreseeable outcome related to these matters. However, our future results may include favorable or unfavorable adjustments to our estimated tax liabilities in the period the assessments are made or resolved or when statutes of limitation on potential assessments expire. As a result, our effective tax rate may fluctuate significantly on a quarterly basis.
Discontinued Operation
In 2005, the Company disposed of its BGI subsidiary. The results of BGI have been reported separately as a discontinued operationexpense in the consolidated statements of incomeoperations. Management evaluates its deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis and assesses the need for all periods presented. As a result, the Company recorded a lossvaluation allowance, if any. A valuation allowance is established when management believes that it is more likely than not that some portion of its deferred tax assets will not be realized. Changes in valuation allowance from operations of the discontinued subsidiary of $340,000, a loss on the sale of BGI of $1.1 million and income tax expense associated with discontinued operations of $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. Since the sale occurred during 2005, thereperiod to period are no assets or liabilities associated with the discontinued operation recorded at December 31, 2006 and 2005included in the consolidated statements of financial condition. Cash flows from BGI are shownCompany’s tax provision in the consolidated statementsperiod of cash flows by activity (operating, investing and financing) consistent withchange. For additional discussion related to the applicable source of the cash flow. See alsoCompany’s accounting policy for income taxes see Note 214, Income Taxes, of the notes to consolidated financial statements.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005 AND 2004Valuation and Other Than Temporary Impairment of Securities
Overview
ForThe Company records all of its securities that are classified as available for sale at fair value. The fair value of equity securities are determined using public quotations, when available. Where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are estimated based on dealer quotes, pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques for which the year ended December 31, 2005, income from continuing operations was $4.6 milliondetermination of fair value may require significant judgment or $0.28 per diluted share, down from $12.9 million or $1.02 per diluted share fromestimation. Fair values of public bonds and those private securities that are actively traded in the prior year. Forsecondary market have been determined through the year ended December 31, 2005, net income was $2.2 million or $0.06 per diluted share compared with net incomeuse of $12.5 million or $0.98 per diluted sharethird-party pricing services using market observable inputs. Private placement securities and other corporate fixed maturities where the Company does not receive a public quotation are valued using a variety of acceptable valuation methods. Market rates used are applicable to the yield, credit quality and average maturity of each security. Private equity securities may also utilize internal valuation methodologies appropriate for the prior year. The primary reasons forspecific asset. Fair values might also be determined using broker quotes or through the use of internal models or analysis.
Securities are evaluated quarterly to determine whether a decline in their fair value is other than temporary. Management utilizes criteria such as, the current intent or requirement to hold or sell, the magnitude and duration of the decline and, when appropriate, consideration of negative changes in net incomeexpected cash flows, creditworthiness, near term prospects of issuers, the level of credit subordination, estimated loss severity, and delinquencies, to determine whether a loss in 2005 werevalue is other than temporary. The term “other than temporary” is not intended to indicate that the $7.9 million decline in net interest income,is permanent, but indicates that the $8.9 million increaseprospect for a near-term recovery of value is not necessarily favorable. Declines in the provision for loan losses, and an increase in noninterest expense of $3.7 million. The Company also sold its BGI subsidiary during 2005 and incurred a loss from discontinued operations of $2.5 million in 2005 compared to $450,000 in 2004. Return on average common equity was 0.43% for 2005 compared to 6.55% in 2004. The provision for loan losses in 2005 was $28.5 million, up $8.9 million from the prior year. Noninterest expenses totaled $65.5 million in 2005, an increase of $3.7 million from 2004, which related to a $295,000 increase in salaries and benefits and a $3.4 million increase in other operating expenses. Other operating expenses included $1.4 million of restructuring costs incurred in 2005 to merge the Company’s subsidiary banks.
Net Interest Income
Net interest income, the principal source of the Company’s earnings, was $67.5 million in 2005, compared to $75.4 million in 2004. Net interest margin was 3.65% for the year ended December 31, 2005, a drop of 25 basis points from the 3.90% level for the same period last year. The Company experienced a significant change in the mix of earning assets, with increased levelsfair value of investment securities and federal funds sold and lower level of loans. Loan assets generally earn higher yieldsbelow their cost that are deemed to be other than investment assets. For 2005,temporary are reflected in comparison to 2004, average

45


investment securities and federal funds sold increased $87.7 million, while average loans decreased $159.4 million. In additionearnings as realized losses to the lower loan base that resulted fromextent the Company’s decisionimpairment is related to sell $169.0 millioncredit issues or concerns, or the security is intended to be sold. The amount of impairment related to non-credit related factors on securities not intended to be sold is recognized in commercial-related loans during 2005, new loan originations slowed and caused an additional drop in total loans.
The Company’s yield on average earning assets was 5.49% for 2005, up 9 basis points from 5.40% in 2004. The Company’s loan portfolio yield was 6.31% for 2005, up 28 basis points from 2004, and tax-equivalent investment yield was 4.44% for 2005, down 4 basis points from 2004. The increased loan portfolio yield in 2005 resulted from the higher general market interest rates and the associated repricing of variable rate loans, as well as the decline in nonperforming loans that resulted from the problem loan sale previously discussed. Improved loan yields were mitigated by the shift in the mix of earning assets.
The average cost of funds for 2005 was 2.21%, an increase of 42 basis points over the same period in 2004. The increases in the average cost of funds primarily resulted from higher deposit interest costs associated with increased general market interest rates. Total average interest-bearing liabilities were $1.65 billion for the year ended December 31, 2005, which represented a $76.2 million decrease from 2004. Total average interest-bearing deposits were $1.52 billion for the year ended December 31, 2005, a decrease of $59.7 million or 4% lower than the average interest-bearing deposits for 2004.
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses represents management’s estimate of the expense necessary to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level representative of probable credit losses inherent in the portfolio. The provision for loan losses totaled $28.5 million in 2005, compared to $19.7 million in 2004. Net loan charge-offs were $47.5 million, or 4.27% of average loans, for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to $9.6 million, or 0.74% of average loans for 2004. The ratio of the allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans was 112% at December 31, 2005 versus 73% at December 31, 2004. The ratio of allowance for loan losses to total loans was 2.04% and 3.13% at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The significant increase in the provision for loan losses in 2005 as compared to 2004 was a result of the Company’s decision to sell a substantial portion of its problem loans during 2005. See the “Analysis on Allowance for Loan Losses” and “Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses” sections for further discussion.
Noninterest Income
The following table presents the major categories of noninterest income for the years ended December 31:
         
(Dollars in thousands) 2005  2004 
 
Service charges on deposits $11,586  $11,987 
ATM and debit card  1,680   1,374 
Financial services group fees and commissions  2,687   2,518 
Mortgage banking revenues  1,597   2,147 
Income from corporate owned life insurance  90   30 
Net gain on sale of credit card portfolio     1,177 
Net gain on sale and call of securities  14   248 
Net gain on sale of student loans held for sale  245    
Net gain on sale of commercial-related loans held for sale  9,369    
Net (loss) gain on sale of premises and equipment  (321)  2 
Net (loss) gain on sale of other real estate and repossessed assets  (9)  193 
Other  2,446   2,473 
       
         
Total noninterest income $29,384  $22,149 
       
Noninterest income increased 32.7% to $29.4 million in 2005 compared to $22.1 million in 2004. The increase was primarily attributed to the net gain of $9.4 million on the sale of commercial-related loans that more than offset the decline in mortgage banking activities, service charges on deposit accounts and other noninterest income categories. The Company also realized a $1.2 million gain on the sale of its credit card portfolio in 2004.comprehensive income.

46

- 55 -


Noninterest ExpenseMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The following table presentsDefined Benefit Pension Plan
Management is required to make various assumptions in valuing its defined benefit pension plan assets and liabilities. These assumptions include, but are not limited to, the major categoriesexpected long-term rate of noninterest expense forreturn on plan assets, the years ended December 31:
         
(Dollars in thousands) 2005  2004 
 
Salaries and employee benefits $34,763  $34,468 
Occupancy and equipment  9,022   8,436 
Supplies and postage  2,173   2,319 
Amortization of other intangible assets  430   709 
Computer and data processing  1,930   1,780 
Professional fees and services  5,074   3,439 
Other  12,100   10,616 
       
         
Total noninterest expense $65,492  $61,767 
       
Noninterest expense was $65.5 million in 2005 comparedweighted average discount rate used to $61.8 million in 2004. The most significant component of noninterest expense was salaries and benefits, which totaled $34.8 million in 2005 and $34.5 million in 2004. Salaries and benefits increased in 2005 from 2004, by only $295,000 or less than 1%. While salaries and benefits costs increased as a result of the additions to staff in the commercial loan origination and monitoring areas, the reduction in bonus and incentive compensation awards in 2005 as compared to 2004 offset the cost increase to a large degree. Occupancy and equipment increased to $9.0 million in 2005 from $8.4 in 2004. Higher expense was incurred throughout 2005 to implement the numerous organizational changes, the majority of which were included in other expense. Legal, consulting and professional fees totaled $4.7 million for 2005value certain liabilities and the increase was associated with resolving the Company’s asset quality issues, regulatory issues and restructuring, as well as legal costs related to the special committee’s investigation resulting from a demand letter received from a law firm representing a shareholder. The increase in noninterest expenses, coupled with the flatteningrate of revenue growth, were the principal factors in the rise in the Company’s efficiency ratio to 70.18% for 2005, compared to 60.41% for 2004.
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) From Continuing Operations
The income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations provides for federal and New York State income taxes, which amounted to a benefit of $1.8 million and expense of $3.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The fluctuation in income tax expense corresponded in general with taxable income levels for each year. The effective tax rate for 2005 was (61.9)%, compared to 19.7% in 2004. The 2005 effective tax rate was due to the relationship between the size of the favorable permanent differences and pre-tax income from continuing operations, which resulted in the unusual effective tax benefit rate.
Discontinued Operation
compensation increase. The Company disposed of its BGI subsidiaryuses a third-party specialist to assist in 2005. Asmaking these estimates and assumptions. Changes in these estimates and assumptions are reasonably possible and may have a result, the Company recorded a loss from operations of the discontinued subsidiary of $340,000, a loss on the sale of BGI of $1.1 million and income tax expense associated with discontinued operations of $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. For the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company recorded a loss from operations of discontinued subsidiary of $599,000 and associated income tax benefit of $149,000. BGI was originally acquired by FII in a tax-free reorganization that limited FII’s tax basis, resulting in a taxable gain on the sale of the subsidiary. See also Note 2 of the notes to consolidated financial statements.
2006 FOURTH QUARTER RESULTS
Net income for the fourth quarter of 2006 was $3.0 million or $0.23 per diluted share, compared with net income of $5.2 million or $0.43 per diluted share for the third quarter of 2006 and net income of $2.9 million or $0.22 per diluted share in the fourth quarter of the prior year. The decline from the third quarter of 2006 was attributed to the combination of a $389,000 decline in net interest income, a $570,000 increase in noninterest expense, the $491,000 credit for loan loss in the third quarter of 2006 compared to no credit or provision for loan loss in the fourth quarter of 2006 and the $1.4 million gain on the sale of the Company’s trust operations recorded during the

47


third quarter of 2006. Fourth quarter 2006 net income of $3.0 million represented a slight increase from fourth quarter 2005 net income of $2.9 million. The slight increase from the fourth quarter last year is attributed to the combination of a $1.4 million decrease in provision for loan loss and a $1.0 million decrease in noninterest expense, partially offset by a $1.7 million decline in net interest income.
Net interest income for the fourth quarter of 2006 declined $1.7 million compared to the same quarter last year, or 10.7%, to $14.3 million primarily the result of an 11 basis point drop in tax-equivalent net interest margin, a $138.4 million reduction in average interest-earning assets coupled with a change in the mix of those interest-earning assets from higher yielding loans to lower yielding investments. The net interest margin for the fourth quarter of 2006 was 3.44% compared with 3.55% in the same quarter last year.
The provision for loan losses totaled $1.4 million for fourth quarter 2005 compared with a credit for loan losses of $491,000 for the third quarter of 2006 and no credit or provision recorded for the fourth quarter of 2006. Net loan charge-offs were $633,000, or 0.27% of average loans, for the fourth quarter 2006 compared to $2.0 million, or 0.79% of average loans for the fourth quarter 2005.
Noninterest income for the fourth quarter of 2006 declined $142,000, or 2.9%, to $4.8 million, from $4.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2005. The primary reason was the $297,000 decline in financial services group fees and commissions, as the Company sold its trust relationships during the third quarter of 2006 and experienced lower sales volumes in the broker-dealer business.
Noninterest expense for the fourth quarter of 2006 was $15.2 million, a 6.2% decrease from $16.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2005. Salaries and benefits increased $387,000 to $8.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2006 compared to the same quarter last year. The increase resulted from stock compensation expense recorded in 2006 as a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) and the reversal of certain bonus and incentive accruals in the prior year due to full-year 2005 financial results. Professional fees and services decreased to $747,000 in the fourth quarter of 2006, down 45.5% from $1.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2005. Other noninterest expense decreased $878,000, or 25.4% to $2.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2006 compared to the same quarter last year. This decrease in other noninterest expenses was due in part to one-time restructuring costs incurred in the fourth quarter of 2005.
Average total deposits were down 7.7% for the fourth quarter 2006 to $1.631 billion in comparison to $1.766 billion in the same quarter last year. Contributing to the decline in deposits were fewer certificates of deposit, including brokered certificates of deposit, as the Company actively managed to lower the level of these higher cost deposits. Other deposit categories declined due to deposit outflows associated with the effects of the 2005 loan sale and from competitors offering higher rate products.
Average total loans declined 6.7% to $933.0 million for the fourth quarter 2006, compared with $1.002 billion for the same quarter in the prior year. The Company’s loan portfolio declined as loan payments outpaced new loan originations. The Company’s strategy is to rebuild a balanced quality loan portfolio and loan originations slowed due to more stringent underwriting requirements, firm pricing disciplines and a highly competitive marketplace for quality loans. Nonperforming assets at December 31, 2006 were $17.0 million compared with $14.4 million at September 30, 2006, and $19.7 million at December 31, 2005. The increase in the fourth quarter 2006 was principally due to one credit in the dairy industry.

48


LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Liquidity
The objective of maintaining adequate liquidity is to assure the ability of the Company to meet its financial obligations. These obligations include the withdrawal of deposits on demand or at their contractual maturity, the repayment of borrowings as they mature, the ability to fund new and existing loan commitments and the ability to take advantage of new business opportunities. The Company achieves liquidity by maintaining a strong base of core customer funds, maturing short-term assets, the ability to sell securities, lines of credit, and access to capital markets.
Liquidity for the Bank is managed through the monitoring of anticipated changes in loans, the investment portfolio, core deposits and wholesale funds. The strength of the Bank’s liquidity position is a result of its base of core customer deposits. These core deposits are supplemented by wholesale funding sources that include credit lines with the other banking institutions, the FHLB and the Federal Reserve Bank.
The primary sources of liquidity for FII are dividends from the Bank and access to capital markets. Dividends from the Bank are limited by various regulatory requirements related to capital adequacy and earnings trends. The Bank relies on cash flows from operations, core deposits, borrowings, short-term liquid assets. FSIS relies on cash flows from operations and funds from FII when necessary.
The Company’s cash and cash equivalents were $109.8 million at December 31, 2006, up from $91.9 million at December 31, 2005. The Company began investing in commercial paper due in less than 90 days during 2006 and has classified the short-term investment as a cash equivalent when applicable. No such commercial paper was held as of December 31, 2006. The Company’s net cash provided by operating activities totaled $30.2 million and the principal source of operating activity cash flow was net income adjusted for noncash income and expense items and changes in other assets and other liabilities. Net cash provided by investing activities totaled $120.5 million, which included net proceeds of $56.4 million from a decline in securities and $62.0 million of loan payments in excess of loan originations. Net cash used in financing activities of $132.8 million was primarily attributed to the $99.6 million decrease in deposits.
The Company’s cash and cash equivalents were $91.9 million at December 31, 2005, an increase of $45.8 million from $46.1 million at December 31, 2004. The Company’s net cash provided by operating activities totaled $45.1 million. The principal source of operating activity cash flow was the Company’s net income adjusted for noncash income and expenses items and changes in other assets and other liabilities. The Company utilized its cash in investing activities through the net acquisition of $84.5 million in securities and $4.8 million in premises and equipment. Net cash provided from investment activities included $70.5 million of loan payments in excess of loan originations, $140.5 million generated from the sale of commercial-related loans and $4.5 million from the sale of the discontinued subsidiary. The Company utilized cash in financing activities by funding a $101.7 million decrease in deposits, reducing debt by $17.4 million and paying $6.9 million in dividends to shareholders.
Contractual Obligations
The following table presents the Company’s contractual obligations at December 31, 2006:
                     
      Less Than          More Than 
  Total  1 Year  1-3 Years  3-5 Years  5 Years 
   
Operating leases $4,689  $769  $1,310  $831  $1,779 
Service agreements and other  2,049   536   575   575   363 
Long-term borrowings  38,187   12,321   25,720   146    
Junior subordinated debentures  16,702            16,702 
                
                     
Total contractual obligations $61,627  $13,626  $27,605  $1,552  $18,844 
                

49


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company has guaranteed distributions and payments for redemption or liquidation of trust preferred securities issued by a wholly owned, deconsolidated subsidiary trust to the extent of funds held by the trust. Although the guarantee is not separately recorded, the obligation underlying the guarantee is fully reflectedmaterial impact on the Company’s consolidated statementfinancial statements, results of financial condition as junior subordinated debentures. The subsidiary’s trust preferred securities currently qualify as Tier 1 capital under the Federal Reserve Board’s capital adequacy guidelines. For further information regarding the junior subordinated debentures issued to unconsolidated subsidiary trust, see Note 10 of the notes to consolidated financial statements.
In the normal course of business, the Company has outstanding commitments to extend credit that are not reflected in its consolidated financial statements. The commitments generally have fixed expiration datesoperations or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. At December 31, 2006 stand-by letters of credit totaling $5.8 million and unused loan commitments of $258.6 million were contractually available. Comparable amounts for these commitments at December 31, 2005 were $9.5 million and $231.5 million, respectively. The total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements as many of the commitments are expected to expire without funding. For further information regarding the outstanding loan commitments, see Note 12 of the notes to consolidated financial statements.
The Company also extends rate lock agreements to borrowers related to the origination of residential mortgage loans. To mitigate the interest rate risk inherent in these rate lock agreements, as well as closed mortgage loans held for sale, the Company enters into forward commitments to sell individual mortgage loans. Rate lock agreements and forward commitments are considered derivatives and are recorded at fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 133. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the total notional amount of these derivatives (rate lock agreements and forward commitments) held by the Company amounted to $4.5 million and $8.2 million, respectively.
Capital Resources
The FRB has adopted a system using risk-based capital guidelines to evaluate the capital adequacy of bank holding companies on a consolidated basis. The guidelines require a minimum total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0%. Leverage ratio is also utilized in assessing capital adequacy with a minimum requirement that can range from 4.0% to 5.0%. The following table reflects the components of those ratios:
             
         
(Dollars in thousands) 2006  2005  2004 
 
Total shareholders’ equity $182,388  $171,757  $184,287 
Less: Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale  (6,800)  (6,178)  3,884 
Unrecognized net periodic pension costs  210       
Unrecognized net periodic postretirement costs  (1,814)      
Disallowed goodwill and other intangible assets  38,263   38,839   43,476 
Plus: Minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries        178 
Qualifying trust preferred securities  16,200   16,200   16,200 
          
             
Total Tier 1 capital $168,729  $155,296  $153,305 
          
             
Adjusted quarterly average assets $1,894,611  $2,042,731  $2,149,947 
          
             
Tier 1 leverage ratio  8.91%  7.60%  7.13%
             
Total Tier 1 capital $168,729  $155,296  $153,305 
Plus: Qualifying allowance for loan losses  13,355   14,191   17,271 
          
             
Total risk-based capital $182,084  $169,487  $170,576 
          
             
Net risk-weighted assets $1,064,686  $1,129,277  $1,359,803 
          
             
Total risk-based capital ratio  17.10%  15.01%  12.54%
The Company’s Tier 1 leverage ratio was 8.91% at December 31, 2006. The ratio increased from 7.60% at December 31, 2005. Total Tier 1 capital of $168.7 million at December 31, 2006 increased $13.4 million from

50


$155.3 million at December 31, 2005. Total shareholders’ equity increased $10.6 million in 2006, primarily resulting from the $17.4 million of net income and $865,000 in additional paid in capital from the amortization of unvested stock-based compensation, offset by $5.3 million in dividends declared, $604,000 in unrealized loss on securities available for sale and $1.6 million in unrecognized net periodic pension and postretirement costs associated with the adoption of SFAS No. 158.
The Company’s total risk-based capital ratio was 17.10% at December 31, 2006, up from 15.01% at December 31, 2005. Total risk-based capital was $182.1 million at December 31, 2006, an increase of $12.6 million from $169.5 million at December 31, 2005. The risk-based capital ratio improvement was also impacted by the change in the Company’s asset composition, as the Company experienced a decrease in higher risk-weighted loans, coupled with an increase in lower risk-weighted investment securities.liquidity.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
See Note 1, “SummarySummary of Significant Accounting Policies — Recent Accounting Pronouncements, in the notes to consolidated financial statements for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements.

- 56 -


ItemITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market RiskQUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The principal objective of the Company’s interest rate risk management is to evaluate the interest rate risk inherent in certain assets and liabilities, determine the appropriate level of risk to the Company given its business strategy, operating environment, capital and liquidity requirements and performance objectives, and manage the risk consistent with the guidelines approved by FII’s Board of Directors. The Company’s management is responsible for reviewing with the Board its activities and strategies, the effect of those strategies on the net interest margin, the fair value of the portfolio and the effect that changes in interest rates will have on the portfolio and exposure limits. Management developshas developed an Asset-Liability Policy that meets strategic objectives and regularly reviews the activities of the Bank.
Net Interest Income at Risk Analysis
The primary tool the Company uses to manage interest rate risk is a “rate shock” simulation to measure the rate sensitivity of the balance sheet.statement of financial condition. Rate shock simulation is a modeling technique used to estimate the impact of changes in rates on net interest income and economic value of equity. The following table sets forth the results of the modeling analysis atas of December 31, 2006:
(Dollars2009 (dollars in thousands):
                         
Change in Interest        
Rates in Basis Points Net Interest Income Economic Value of Equity
(Rate Shock) Amount $Change % Change Amount $Change % Change
 
200 $59,503  $(2,871)  (4.60)% $302,527  $(38,615)  (11.32)%
100  61,112   (1,262)  (2.02)%  321,789   (19,353)  (5.67)%
Static  62,374         341,142       
(100)  63,721   1,347   2.16%  362,643   21,501   6.30%
(200)  64,275   1,901   3.05%  377,987   36,845   10.80%
                         
  Net Interest Income  Economic Value of Equity 
Changes ininterest rate Amount  Change  Amount  Change 
                         
+ 300 basis points $77,667  $1,887   2.49% $382,072  $(17,550)  (4.39)%
+ 200 basis points  77,038   1,258   1.66   389,616   (10,006)  (2.50)
+ 100 basis points  76,405   624   0.82   397,666   (1,956)  (0.49)
- 100 basis points  72,533   (3,248)  (4.29)  390,784   (8,838)  (2.21)
The Company measures net interest income at risk by estimating the changes in net interest income resulting from instantaneous and sustained parallel shifts in interest rates of different magnitudes over a period of 12 months. As of December 31, 2006,2009, a 200100 basis point increase in rates would increase net interest income by $624 thousand, or 0.8%, over the next twelve-month period. A 100 basis point decrease in rates would decrease net interest income by $2.9$3.2 million, or 4.60%, over the next twelve-month period. A 200 basis point decrease in rates would increase net interest income by $1.9 million, or 3.05%4.3%, over a twelve-month period. As of December 31, 2006,2009, a 200100 basis point increase in rates would decrease the economic value of equity by $38.6$2.0 million, or 11.32%0.5%, over the next twelve-month period. A 200100 basis point decrease in rates would increasedecrease the economic value of equity by $36.8$8.8 million, or 10.80%2.2%, over a twelve-month period. This simulation is based on management’s assumption as to the effect of interest rate changes on assets and liabilities and assumes a parallel shift of the yield curve. It also includes certain assumptions about the future pricing of loans and deposits in response to changes in interest rates.

51


Further, it assumes that delinquency rates would not change as a result of changes in interest rates, although there can be no assurance that this will be the case. While this simulation is a useful measure as to net interest income at risk due to a change in interest rates, it is not a forecast of the future results and is based on many assumptions that, if changed, could cause a different outcome.
In addition to the changes in interest rate scenarios listed above, the Company typically runs other scenarios to measure interest rate risk, which vary depending on the economic and interest rate environments.

- 57 -


Gap Analysis
The following table (the “Gap Table”) sets forthpresents an analysis of the amounts ofCompany’s interest rate sensitivity gap position at December 31, 2009. All interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities outstanding at December 31, 2006 which management anticipates,are shown based upon certain assumptions, to re-price or mature in each of the future time periods shown. Except as stated below, the amount of assets and liabilities shown which re-price or mature during a particular period were determined in accordance withon the earlier of the re-pricing date or thetheir contractual maturity or re-pricing date. The expected maturities are presented on a contractual basis or, if more relevant, based on projected call dates. Investment securities are at amortized cost for both securities available for sale and securities held to maturity. Loans, net of the asset or liability. The table sets forth an approximation of the projected re-pricing of assets and liabilities on the basisdeferred loan origination costs, include principal amortization adjusted for estimated prepayments (principal payments in excess of contractual maturities, anticipatedamounts) and non-accruing loans. Borrowings include junior subordinated debentures. Because the interest rate sensitivity levels shown in the table could be changed by external factors such as loan prepayments and scheduledliability decay rates or by factors controllable by the Company such as asset sales, it is not an absolute reflection of our potential interest rate adjustments within the selected time intervals. All non-maturity deposits (demand deposits and savings deposits) are subject to immediate withdrawal and are therefore shown to re-price in the period of less than 30 days. Prepayment and re-pricing rates can have a significant impact on the estimated gap. The results shown are based on numerous assumptions and there can be no assurance that the presented results will approximate actual future activity.risk profile (in thousands).
                                 
  December 31, 2006 
  Volumes Subject to Repricing Within 
  0-30  31-180  181-365  1-3  3-5  >5  Non-    
(Dollars in thousands) days  days  days  years  years  years  Sensitive  Total 
 
Interest-earning assets:                                
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits $62,233  $  $194  $179  $  $  $  $62,606 
Investment securities (1)  9,004   100,480   68,695   257,052   164,300   176,005      775,536 
Loans (2)  299,341   60,852   71,477   193,521   141,558   155,317   5,408   927,474 
                         
Total interest- earning assets  370,578   161,332   140,366   450,752   305,858   331,322   5,408   1,765,616 
                         
                                 
Interest-bearing liabilities:                                
Interest-bearing demand, savings and money market  674,224                     674,224 
Certificates of deposit  84,846   207,841   288,737   77,043   10,743   478      669,688 
Borrowed funds (3)  32,315   1,023   11,294   25,720   145   16,702      87,199 
                         
Total interest- bearing liabilities  791,385   208,864   300,031   102,763   10,888   17,180      1,431,111 
                         
                                 
Period gap $(420,807) $(47,532) $(159,665) $347,989  $294,970  $314,142  $5,408  $334,505 
                         
                                 
Cumulative gap $(420,807) $(468,339) $(628,004) $(280,015) $14,955  $329,097  $334,505     
                         
                                 
Period gap to total assets  (22.06)%  (2.49)%  (8.37)%  18.24%  15.46%  16.47%  0.29%  17.54%
                         
                                 
Cumulative gap to total assets  (22.06)%  (24.55)%  (32.92)%  (14.68)%  0.78%  17.25%  17.54%    
                         
                                 
Cumulative interest-earning assets to cumulative interest- bearing liabilities  46.83%  53.18%  51.70%  80.04%  101.06%  123.00%  123.37%    
                         
                     
  At December 31, 2009 
      Over Three  Over       
  Three  Months  One Year       
  Months  Through  Through  Over    
  or Less  One Year  Five Years  Five Years  Total 
INTEREST-EARNING ASSETS:                    
Federal funds sold and interest-earning deposits in other banks $85  $  $  $  $85 
Investment securities  114,564   153,068   241,123   108,620   617,375 
Loans  425,288   220,328   533,766   85,045   1,264,427 
                
Total interest-earning assets $539,937  $373,396  $774,889  $193,665   1,881,887 
                 
Cash and due from banks                  42,874 
Other assets(1)
                  137,628 
                    
Total assets                 $2,062,389 
                    
                     
INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES:                    
Interest-bearing demand, savings and money market $732,301  $  $  $  $732,301 
Certificates of deposit  192,100   334,449   159,457   345   686,351 
Borrowings  59,543   20,080   10,065   16,702   106,390 
                
Total interest-bearing liabilities $983,944  $354,529  $169,522  $17,047   1,525,042 
                 
Noninterest-bearing deposits                  324,303 
Other liabilities                  14,750 
                    
Total liabilities                  1,864,095 
Shareholders’ equity                  198,294 
                    
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity                 $2,062,389 
                    
                     
Interest sensitivity gap $(444,007) $18,867  $605,367  $176,618  $356,845 
                
Cumulative gap $(444,007) $(425,140) $180,227  $356,845     
                 
Cumulative gap ratio(2)
  54.9%  68.2%  112.0%  123.4%    
Cumulative gap as a percentage of total assets  (21.5)%  (20.6)%  8.7%  17.3%    
 
(1) Amounts shown include the amortized cost of held to maturity
(1)Includes net unrealized gain on securities and the fair value of available for sale securities.and allowance for loan losses.
 
(2) Amounts shown include loans held for sale and are net of unearned income and net deferred fees and costs.
(3)Amounts shown include junior subordinated debentures.Cumulative total interest-earning assets divided by cumulative total interest-bearing liabilities.
For purposes of interest rate risk management, the Company directs more attention on simulation modeling, such as “net interest income at risk” as previously discussed, rather than gap analysis. The net interest income at risk simulation modeling is considered by management to be more informative in forecasting future income at risk.

52

- 58 -


ItemITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary DataFINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
Page
60
61
62
63
64
65
67
68

- 59 -


Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for Financial Institutions, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”), as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f). The Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting has been designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and board of directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Any system of internal control over financial reporting, no matter how well designed, has inherent limitations, including the possibility that a control can be circumvented or overridden and misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, because of changes in conditions, internal control effectiveness may vary over time. Accordingly, even an effective system of internal control will provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
The Company’s management has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20062009. To make this assessment, we used the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described inInternal Control — Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our assessment and 2005based on such criteria, we believe that, as of December 31, 2009, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.
The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm that audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements has issued an attestation report on internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009. That report appears herein.
/s/ Peter G. Humphrey
President and Chief Executive Officer
/s/ Karl F. Krebs
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
March 12, 2010March 12, 2010

- 60 -


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
         
      
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) 2006  2005 
 
Assets
        
Cash and due from banks $47,166  $46,987 
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits in other banks  62,606   44,953 
Securities available for sale, at fair value  735,148   790,855 
Securities held to maturity (fair value of $40,421 and $42,898 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively)  40,388   42,593 
Loans held for sale  992   1,253 
         
Loans  926,482   992,321 
Less: Allowance for loan losses  17,048   20,231 
       
Loans, net  909,434   972,090 
         
Premises and equipment, net  34,562   36,471 
Goodwill  37,369   37,369 
Other assets  39,887   49,821 
       
         
Total assets $1,907,552  $2,022,392 
       
         
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
        
         
Liabilities:        
Deposits:        
Noninterest-bearing demand $273,783  $284,958 
Interest-bearing demand, savings and money market  674,224   755,229 
Certificates of deposit  669,688   677,074 
       
Total deposits  1,617,695   1,717,261 
Short-term borrowings  32,310   20,106 
Long-term borrowings  38,187   78,391 
Junior subordinated debentures issued to unconsolidated subsidiary trust (“Junior subordinated debentures”)  16,702   16,702 
Other liabilities  20,270   18,175 
       
         
Total liabilities  1,725,164   1,850,635 
         
Shareholders’ equity:        
3% cumulative preferred stock, $100 par value, authorized 10,000 shares, issued and outstanding 1,586 shares at December 31, 2006 and 2005  159   159 
8.48% cumulative preferred stock, $100 par value, authorized 200,000 shares, issued and outstanding 174,639 and 174,747 shares at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively  17,464   17,475 
Common stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 50,000,000 shares, issued 11,348,122 and 11,334,874 shares at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively  113   113 
Additional paid-in capital  24,439   23,278 
Retained earnings  148,730   136,925 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (8,404)  (6,178)
Treasury stock, at cost — 5,351 and 1,000 shares at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively  (113)  (15)
       
         
Total shareholders’ equity  182,388   171,757 
       
         
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $1,907,552  $2,022,392 
       
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Financial Institutions, Inc.:
We have audited Financial Institutions, Inc. and subsidiaries’ (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management Report. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also includes performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statements of financial condition of the Company as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, and our report dated March 12, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Rochester, New York
March 12, 2010

- 61 -


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Financial Institutions, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of Financial Institutions, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 12, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Rochester, New York
March 12, 2010

- 62 -


FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
         
  December 31, 
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data) 2009  2008 
ASSETS
        
Cash and cash equivalents:        
Cash and due from banks $42,874  $34,528 
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits in other banks  85   20,659 
       
         
Total cash and cash equivalents  42,959   55,187 
  
Securities available for sale, at fair value  580,501   547,506 
Securities held to maturity, at amortized cost (fair value of $40,629 and $59,147, respectively)  39,573   58,532 
Loans held for sale  421   1,013 
Loans  1,264,006   1,121,079 
Less: Allowance for loan losses  20,741   18,749 
       
Loans, net  1,243,265   1,102,330 
         
Company owned life insurance  24,867   23,692 
Premises and equipment, net  34,783   36,712 
Goodwill  37,369   37,369 
Other assets  58,651   54,578 
       
  
Total assets $2,062,389  $1,916,919 
       
  
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
        
Deposits:        
Noninterest-bearing demand $324,303  $292,586 
Interest-bearing demand  363,698   344,616 
Savings and money market  368,603   348,594 
Certificates of deposit  686,351   647,467 
       
  
Total deposits  1,742,955   1,633,263 
         
Short-term borrowings  59,543   23,465 
Long-term borrowings  46,847   47,355 
Other liabilities  14,750   22,536 
       
  
Total liabilities  1,864,095   1,726,619 
       
         
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)        
         
Shareholders’ equity:        
Series A 3% Preferred Stock, $100 par value; 1,533 shares authorized and issued  153   153 
Series A Preferred Stock, $100 par value; 7,503 shares authorized and issued; aggregate liquidation preference $37,515; net of $1,672 and $2,016 discount, respectively  35,843   35,499 
Series B-1 8.48% Preferred Stock, $100 par value, 200,000 shares authorized, 174,223 shares issued  17,422   17,422 
       
Total preferred equity  53,418   53,074 
         
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 11,348,122 shares issued  113   113 
Additional paid-in capital  26,940   26,397 
Retained earnings  131,371   124,952 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (3,702)  (4,013)
Treasury stock, at cost — 527,854 and 550,103 shares, respectively  (9,846)  (10,223)
       
  
Total shareholders’ equity  198,294   190,300 
       
  
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $2,062,389  $1,916,919 
       
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

53

- 63 -


FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
             
  Years ended December 31, 
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) 2009  2008  2007 
Interest income:            
Interest and fees on loans $72,706  $67,674  $68,560 
Interest and dividends on investment securities  21,694   30,655   34,990 
Other interest income  82   619   1,662 
          
Total interest income  94,482   98,948   105,212 
          
             
Interest expense:            
Deposits  19,090   29,349   42,714 
Short-term borrowings  270   721   864 
Long-term borrowings  2,857   3,547   3,561 
          
Total interest expense  22,217   33,617   47,139 
          
             
Net interest income  72,265   65,331   58,073 
Provision for loan losses  7,702   6,551   116 
          
Net interest income after provision for loan losses  64,563   58,780   57,957 
          
             
Noninterest income (loss):            
Service charges on deposits  10,065   10,497   10,932 
ATM and debit card  3,610   3,313   2,883 
Loan servicing  1,308   664   928 
Company owned life insurance  1,096   563   1,255 
Broker-dealer fees and commissions  1,022   1,458   1,396 
Net gain on sale of loans held for sale  699   339   779 
Net gain on disposal of investment securities  3,429   288   207 
Impairment charges on investment securities  (4,666)  (68,215)   
Net gain on sale and disposal of other assets  180   305   102 
Other  2,052   2,010   2,198 
          
Total noninterest income (loss)  18,795   (48,778)  20,680 
          
             
Noninterest expense:            
Salaries and employee benefits  33,634   31,437   33,175 
Occupancy and equipment  11,062   10,502   9,903 
FDIC assessments  3,651   674   289 
Professional services  2,524   2,141   2,080 
Computer and data processing  2,340   2,433   2,126 
Supplies and postage  1,846   1,800   1,662 
Advertising and promotions  949   1,453   1,402 
Other  6,771   7,021   6,791 
          
Total noninterest expense  62,777   57,461   57,428 
          
Income (loss) before income taxes  20,581   (47,459)  21,209 
Income tax expense (benefit)  6,140   (21,301)  4,800 
          
Net income (loss) $14,441  $(26,158) $16,409 
          
  
Preferred stock dividends, net of accretion  3,697   1,538   1,483 
          
Net income (loss) allocated to common shareholders $10,744  $(27,696) $14,926 
          
Earnings (loss) per common share (Note 15):            
Basic $0.99  $(2.54) $1.34 
Diluted $0.99  $(2.54) $1.33 
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

- 64 -


FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
                             
                  Accumulated        
          Additional      Other      Total 
(Dollars in thousands, Preferred  Common  Paid-in  Retained  Comprehensive  Treasury  Shareholders’ 
except per share data) Equity  Stock  Capital  Earnings  Income (Loss)  Stock  Equity 
                             
Balance at January 1, 2007
 $17,623  $113  $24,222  $148,947  $(8,404) $(113) $182,388 
Comprehensive income:                            
Net income           16,409         16,409 
Other comprehensive income, net of tax              9,071      9,071 
                            
Total comprehensive income                          25,480 
Repurchase of common shares                 (7,203)  (7,203)
Repurchase of Series B-1 8.48% Preferred Stock  (42)                 (42)
Share-based compensation plans:                            
Share-based compensation        955            955 
Stock options exercised        (53)        304   251 
Restricted stock awards issued        (344)        344    
Directors’ retainer        (2)        107   105 
Cash dividends declared:                            
Series A 3% Preferred-$3.00 per share           (5)        (5)
Series B-1 8.48% Preferred-$8.48 per share           (1,478)        (1,478)
Common-$0.46 per share           (5,129)        (5,129)
                      
                             
Balance at December 31, 2007
 $17,581  $113  $24,778  $158,744  $667  $(6,561) $195,322 
Comprehensive income:                            
Net loss           (26,158)        (26,158)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax              (4,680)     (4,680)
                            
Total comprehensive loss                          (30,838)
Cumulative effect of adoption of new accounting pronouncements           (241)        (241)
Repurchase of common shares                 (4,818)  (4,818)
Repurchase of Series A 3% preferred stock  (6)     3            (3)
Warrant issued in connection with Series A Preferred Stock        2,025            2,025 
Issue shares of Series A Preferred Stock  37,515                  37,515 
Discount on Series A Preferred Stock  (2,025)                 (2,025)
Share-based compensation plans:                            
Share-based compensation        603   30         633 
Stock options exercised        (12)        44   32 
Restricted stock awards issued        (998)        998    
Directors’ retainer        (2)        114   112 
Accrued undeclared cumulative dividend on Series A Preferred Stock, net of amortization  9         (56)        (47)
Cash dividends declared:                            
Series A 3% Preferred-$3.00 per share           (5)        (5)
Series B-1 8.48% Preferred-$8.48 per share           (1,477)        (1,477)
Common-$0.54 per share           (5,885)        (5,885)
                      
                             
Balance at December 31, 2008
 $53,074  $113  $26,397  $124,952  $(4,013) $(10,223) $190,300 
                      
Continued on next page
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

- 65 -


FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOMEConsolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Continued)
Years Endedended December 31, 2006, 20052009, 2008 and 20042007
             
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) 2006  2005  2004 
 
Interest income:            
Interest and fees on loans $68,004  $71,649  $78,063 
Interest and dividends on securities  32,778   30,762   27,664 
Other interest income  2,288   1,476   448 
          
Total interest income  103,070   103,887   106,175 
          
             
Interest expense:            
Deposits  37,445   30,255   24,624 
Short-term borrowings  571   377   284 
Long-term borrowings  3,860   4,035   4,132 
Junior subordinated debentures  1,728   1,728   1,728 
          
Total interest expense  43,604   36,395   30,768 
          
             
Net interest income  59,466   67,492   75,407 
 
(Credit) provision for loan losses  (1,842)  28,532   19,676 
          
             
Net interest income after (credit) provision for loan losses  61,308   38,960   55,731 
          
             
Noninterest income:            
Service charges on deposits  11,504   11,586   11,987 
ATM and debit card  2,233   1,680   1,374 
Financial services group fees and commissions  1,890   2,687   2,518 
Mortgage banking revenues  1,194   1,597   2,147 
Income from corporate owned life insurance  521   90   30 
Net gain on sale of credit card portfolio        1,177 
Net gain on sale and call of securities  30   14   248 
Net gain on sale of student loans held for sale  670   245    
Net gain on sale of commercial-related loans held for sale  82   9,369    
Net (loss) gain on sale of premises and equipment  (3)  (321)  2 
Net gain (loss) on sale of other real estate and repossessed assets  90   (9)  193 
Net gain on sale of trust relationships  1,386       
Other  2,314   2,446   2,473 
          
Total noninterest income  21,911   29,384   22,149 
          
             
Noninterest expense:            
Salaries and employee benefits  33,563   34,763   34,468 
Occupancy and equipment  9,465   9,022   8,436 
Supplies and postage  1,945   2,173   2,319 
Amortization of other intangible assets  420   430   709 
Computer and data processing  1,903   1,930   1,780 
Professional fees and services  2,837   5,074   3,439 
Other  9,479   12,100   10,616 
          
Total noninterest expense  59,612   65,492   61,767 
          
             
Income from continuing operations before income taxes  23,607   2,852   16,113 
             
Income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations  6,245   (1,766)  3,170 
          
             
Income from continuing operations  17,362   4,618   12,943 
             
Discontinued operations:            
Loss from operations of discontinued subsidiary     (340)  (599)
Loss on sale of discontinued subsidiary     (1,071)   
Income tax expense (benefit)     1,041   (149)
          
Loss on discontinued operations     (2,452)  (450)
          
             
Net Income $17,362  $2,166  $12,493 
          
             
Earnings per common share:            
Basic:            
Income from continuing operations $1.40  $0.28  $1.02 
Net income $1.40  $0.06  $0.98 
Diluted:            
Income from continuing operations $1.40  $0.28  $1.02 
Net income $1.40  $0.06  $0.98 
                             
                  Accumulated        
          Additional      Other      Total 
(Dollars in thousands, Preferred  Common  Paid-in  Retained  Comprehensive  Treasury  Shareholders’ 
except per share data) Equity  Stock  Capital  Earnings  Income (Loss)  Stock  Equity 
                             
Balance at December 31, 2008
 $53,074  $113  $26,397  $124,952  $(4,013) $(10,223) $190,300 
Balance carried forward
                            
                             
Comprehensive income:                            
Net income           14,441         14,441 
Other comprehensive income, net of tax              311      311 
                      
Total comprehensive income                          14,752 
Issuance costs of Series A Preferred Stock        (68)           (68)
Share-based compensation plans:                            
Share-based compensation        852   2         854 
Stock options exercised        (4)        19   15 
Restricted stock awards issued, net        (207)        207    
Directors’ retainer          (30)          151   121 
Accrued undeclared cumulative dividend on Series A Preferred Stock, net of amortization  344         (537)        (193)
Cash dividends declared:                            
Series A 3% Preferred-$3.00 per share           (5)        (5)
Series A Preferred-$223.61 per share           (1,678)        (1,678)
Series B-1 8.48% Preferred-$8.48 per share           (1,477)        (1,477)
Common-$0.40 per share           (4,327)        (4,327)
                      
                             
Balance at December 31, 2009
 $53,418  $113  $26,940  $131,371  $(3,702) $(9,846) $198,294 
                      
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

54

- 66 -


FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
                                 
                  Accumulated Other    
  3%  8.48%      Additional  Comprehensive  Total 
(Dollars in thousands, Preferred  Preferred  Common  Paid in  Retained  Income  Treasury  Shareholders’ 
     except per share amounts) Stock  Stock  Stock  Capital  Earnings  (Loss)  Stock  Equity 
 
Balance – December 31, 2003
 $167  $17,568  $113  $21,055  $136,938  $8,197  $(935) $183,103 
Purchase of 12 shares of 3% preferred stock  (2)        1            (1)
Purchase of 112 shares of 8.48% preferred stock     (11)     (1)           (12)
Purchase of 2,000 shares of common stock                    (30)  (30)
Issue 2,266 shares of common stock — directors plan           36         16   52 
Issue 65,975 shares of common stock - exercised stock options, net of tax           667         464   1,131 
Tax benefit from stock options exercised           204            204 
Issue 14,524 shares of common stock - Burke Group, Inc. acquisition and earnout           223         102   325 
Comprehensive income:                                
Net income              12,493         12,493 
Net unrealized loss on securities available for sale (net of tax of ($2,765))                 (4,164)     (4,164)
Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income (net of tax of $99)                 (149)     (149)
                                
Other comprehensive loss                              (4,313)
                                
Total comprehensive income                              8,180 
                                
Cash dividends declared:                                
3% Preferred — $3.00 per share              (5)        (5)
8.48% Preferred — $8.48 per share              (1,490)        (1,490)
Common — $0.64 per share              (7,170)        (7,170)
                         
Balance — December 31, 2004
 $165  $17,557  $113  $22,185  $140,766  $3,884  $(383) $184,287 
 
Purchase of 68 shares of 3% preferred stock  (6)        3            (3)
Purchase of 824 shares of 8.48% preferred stock     (82)     (4)           (86)
Purchase of 6,000 shares of common stock                    (89)  (89)
Issue 3,140 shares of common stock — directors plan           35         22   57 
Issue 67,253 shares of common stock - exercised stock options, net of tax           648         292   940 
Tax benefit from stock options exercised           129            129 
Issue 20,406 shares of common stock - Burke Group, Inc. contingent earnout           282         143   425 
Comprehensive loss:                                
Net income              2,166         2,166 
Net unrealized loss on securities available for sale (net of tax of ($6,670))                 (10,053)     (10,053)
Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income (net of tax of $5)                 (9)     (9)
                                
Other comprehensive loss                              (10,062)
                                
Total comprehensive loss                              (7,896)
                                
Cash dividends declared:                                
3% Preferred — $3.00 per share              (5)        (5)
8.48% Preferred — $8.48 per share              (1,483)        (1,483)
Common — $0.40 per share              (4,519)        (4,519)
                         
Balance — December 31, 2005
 $159  $17,475  $113  $23,278  $136,925  $(6,178) $(15) $171,757 
 
Purchase of 108 shares of 8.48% preferred stock     (11)                 (11)
Purchase of 20,351 shares of common stock                    (335)  (335)
Issue 5,693 shares of common stock – directors retainer           28         84   112 
Issue 10,355 shares of common stock - exercised stock options, net of tax           173         23   196 
Excess tax benefit from stock options exercised           8            8 
Issue 13,200 shares of common stock - restricted stock awards           131   (261)     130    
Amortization of unvested stock options           821            821 
Amortization of unvested restricted stock awards              44         44 
Defined benefit pension plan – adjustment for SFAS 158:                                
Net prior service cost (net of tax of ($1,087))                 (1,704)     (1,704)
Net loss (net of tax of ($70))                 (110)     (110)
                                
Net adjustment for defined benefit pension plan                              (1,814)
                                
Postretirement benefit plan – adjustment for SFAS 158:                                
Net prior service benefit (net of tax of $287)                 450      450 
Net loss (net of tax of ($153))                 (240)     (240)
                                
Net adjustment for postretirement benefit plan                              210 
                                
Comprehensive income:                                
Net income              17,362         17,362 
Net unrealized loss on securities available for sale (net of tax of ($229))                 (604)     (604)
Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income (net of tax of ($12))                 (18)     (18)
                                
Other comprehensive loss                              (622)
                                
Total comprehensive income                              16,740 
                                
Cash dividends declared:                                
3% Preferred — $3.00 per share              (5)        (5)
8.48% Preferred — $8.48 per share              (1,481)        (1,481)
Common — $0.34 per share              (3,854)        (3,854)
                         
Balance — December 31, 2006
 $159  $17,464  $113  $24,439  $148,730  $(8,404) $(113) $182,388 
                         
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
             
  Years ended December 31, 
(Dollars in thousands) 2009  2008  2007 
Cash flows from operating activities:            
Net income (loss) $14,441  $(26,158) $16,409 
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:            
Depreciation and amortization  4,067   3,959   3,991 
Net amortization (accretion) of premiums and discounts on securities  2,587   390   (185)
Provision for loan losses  7,702   6,551   116 
Share-based compensation  854   633   955 
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)  7,470   (23,848)  715 
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale  90,290   28,685   48,048 
Originations of loans held for sale  (88,999)  (28,453)  (47,183)
Increase in company owned life insurance  (1,096)  (563)  (111)
Net gain on sale of loans held for sale  (699)  (339)  (779)
Net gain on disposal of investment securities  (3,429)  (288)  (207)
Impairment charge on investment securities  4,666   68,215    
Net gain on sale and disposal of other assets  (180)  (305)  (102)
(Increase) decrease in other assets  (8,773)  (1,322)  3,510 
Decrease in other liabilities  (6,633)  (5,866)  (2,406)
          
Net cash provided by operating activities  22,268   21,291   22,771 
          
             
Cash flows from investing activities:            
Purchases of investment securities:            
Available for sale  (602,259)  (310,191)  (307,049)
Held to maturity  (29,280)  (54,925)  (54,926)
Proceeds from principal payments, maturities and calls on investment securities:            
Available for sale  353,545   337,704   308,323 
Held to maturity  46,891   57,325   36,169 
Proceeds from sale of securities available for sale  224,928   58,368   49,350 
Net loan originations  (165,716)  (161,414)  (41,778)
Purchases of company owned life insurance  (79)  (20,112)  (58)
Proceeds from sales of other assets  1,709   1,783   1,307 
Purchases of premises and equipment  (1,959)  (6,333)  (3,407)
          
Net cash used in investing activities  (172,220)  (97,795)  (12,069)
          
             
Cash flows from financing activities:            
Net increase (decrease) in deposits  109,692   57,292   (41,724)
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings  36,078   (2,178)  (6,668)
Proceeds from long-term borrowings     30,000    
Repayments of long-term borrowings  (508)  (25,212)  (12,321)
Purchases of preferred and common shares     (4,821)  (7,245)
Proceeds from issuance of preferred and common shares, net of issuance costs  (68)  35,602   105 
Proceeds from issuance of common stock warrant     2,025    
Proceeds from stock options exercised  15   32   251 
Cash dividends paid to preferred shareholders  (3,160)  (1,482)  (1,483)
Cash dividends paid to common shareholders  (4,325)  (6,240)  (4,716)
          
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  137,724   85,018   (73,801)
          
             
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents  (12,228)  8,514   (63,099)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period  55,187   46,673   109,772 
          
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $42,959  $55,187  $46,673 
          
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

55

- 67 -


FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
             
(Dollars in thousands) 2006  2005  2004 
 
Cash flows from operating activities:            
Net income $17,362  $2,166  $12,493 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:            
Depreciation and amortization  4,125   4,388   4,421 
Net amortization of premiums and discounts on securities  644   874   1,801 
(Credit) provision for loan losses  (1,842)  28,532   19,676 
Amortization of unvested stock options  821       
Amortization of unvested restricted stock awards  44       
Tax benefit from stock options exercised  22   129   204 
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)  63   7,702   (4,477)
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale  69,451   86,258   66,451 
Originations of loans held for sale  (68,793)  (84,287)  (64,218)
Net gain on sale of securities  (30)  (14)  (248)
Net gain on sale of loans held for sale  (973)  (776)  (910)
Net gain on sale of credit card portfolio        (1,177)
Net gain on sale of commercial-related loans held for sale  (82)  (9,369)   
Net (gain) loss on sale and disposal of other assets  (87)  339   (195)
Loss on sale of discontinued subsidiary     1,071    
Minority interest in net income of subsidiaries     54   26 
Net gain on sale of trust relationships  (1,386)      
Decrease in other assets  8,538   9,279   4,782 
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities  2,325   (1,247)  2,943 
          
Net cash provided by operating activities  30,202   45,099   41,572 
             
Cash flows from investing activities:            
Purchase of securities:            
Available for sale  (66,769)  (260,291)  (353,567)
Held to maturity  (32,524)  (27,382)  (30,828)
Proceeds from maturity, call and principal pay-down of securities:            
Available for sale  119,305   176,604   181,707 
Held to maturity  34,724   24,091   38,603 
Proceeds from sale of securities available for sale  1,699   2,445   40,930 
Net loan pay-downs  61,996   70,511   68,833 
Net proceeds from sale of credit card portfolio        5,703 
Net proceeds from sale of commercial-related loans  659   140,453    
Net proceeds from sale of discontinued subsidiary     4,538    
Proceeds from sales of other assets  1,847   59   103 
Proceeds from sales of trust relationships  1,386       
Purchase of premises and equipment  (1,871)  (4,843)  (5,947)
Purchase of bank subsidiary minority interest     (212)   
Proceeds from sale of equity investment in Mercantile Adjustment Bureau        2,400 
          
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  120,452   125,973   (52,063)
             
Cash flows from financing activities:            
Net (decrease) increase in deposits  (99,566)  (101,689)  58 
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings  12,204   (8,448)  5,029 
Repayment of long-term borrowings  (40,204)  (8,967)  (26,640)
Purchase of preferred and common shares  (346)  (178)  (43)
Issuance of common shares  112   57   52 
Stock options exercised  196   940   1,131 
Excess tax benefit from stock options exercised  8       
Dividends paid  (5,226)  (6,902)  (8,652)
          
Net cash used in financing activities  (132,822)  (125,187)  (29,065)
          
             
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  17,832   45,885   (39,556)
             
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year  91,940   46,055   85,611 
          
             
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year $109,772  $91,940  $46,055 
          
             
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:            
Cash paid during year for:            
Interest $42,438  $35,178  $29,398 
Income taxes paid  4,051      6,553 
Income taxes received  (6,300)      
Noncash investing and financing activities:            
Issuance of common stock in purchase acquisitions/earnouts $  $425  $325 
Net transfer of loans to/from held for sale at estimated fair value     131,658    
Real estate and other assets acquired in settlement of loans  2,502   1,833   3,082 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

56


FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) Summary of Significant Accounting PoliciesDecember 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
Basis of Presentation(1.) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Financial Institutions, Inc. (“FII”), a bankfinancial holding company organized under the laws of New York State (“New York” or “NYS”), and its subsidiaries (collectively the “Company”) provide deposit, lending and other financial services to individuals and businesses in Central and Western New York State.York. The Company is subject to regulation by certain federal and state agencies.
The Company for many years operated under a decentralized, “Super Community Bank” business model, with separate and largely autonomous subsidiary banks whose Boards and management hadowns all of the authority to operate within guidelines set forth in broad corporate policies established at the holding company level. During 2005, FII’s Boardcapital stock of Directors implemented changes to the Company’s business model and governance structure. Effective December 3, 2005, the Company merged three of its bank subsidiaries, Wyoming County Bank (100% owned) (“WCB”), National Bank of Geneva (100% owned) (“NBG”) and Bath National Bank (100% owned) (“BNB”) into its New York State-chartered bank subsidiary, First Tier Bank & Trust (100% owned) (“FTB”), which was then renamed Five Star Bank, (“FSB” or the “Bank”). The merger was accounted for at historical cost as a combination of entities under common control.
FII formerly qualified as a financial holding company under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which allowed expansion of business operations to include financial services subsidiaries, namely,New York State chartered bank, and Five Star Investment Services, Inc. (100% owned) (“FSIS”) (formerly known as, a broker-dealer subsidiary offering noninsured investment products. The FI Group, Inc. (“FIGI”)) and the Burke Group, Inc. (formerlyCompany also owns 100% owned) (“BGI”), collectively referred to as the “Financial Services Group” (“FSG”). FSIS is a brokerage subsidiary that commenced operations as a start-up company in March 2000. BGI, an employee benefits and compensation consulting firm, was acquired by the Company in October 2001. During 2005, the Company sold the stock of BGI and its results have been reported separately as a discontinued operation in the consolidated statements of income for all periods presented in these financial statements. Since the sale of BGI occurred during 2005, there are no assets or liabilities associated with the discontinued operation recorded at December 31, 2006 and 2005. BGI’s cash flows are shown in the consolidated statements of cash flows by activity (operating, investing and financing) consistent with the applicable source of cash flow.
During 2003, FII terminated its financial holding company status and now operates as a bank holding company. The change in status did not affect the non-financial subsidiaries or activities being conducted by the Company, although future acquisitions or expansions of non-financial activities may require prior Federal Reserve Board (“FRB”) approval and will be limited to those that are permissible for bank holding companies.
In February 2001, the Company formed FISI Statutory Trust I (100% owned) (the “Trust”) and capitalized the entity with a $502,000 investment in the Trust’s common securities. The Trust, which was formed to facilitatein February 2001 for the private placementpurpose of $16.2 million in capital securities (“issuing trust preferred securities”securities. References to “the Company” mean the consolidated reporting entities and references to “the Bank” mean Five Star Bank.
The accounting and reporting policies conform to general practices within the banking industry and to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Effective December 31, 2003,Prior years’ consolidated financial statements are re-classified whenever necessary to conform to the provisions ofcurrent year’s presentation.
The Financial Accounting Standards BoardBoard’s (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 46, “ConsolidationAccounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) became effective on July 1, 2009. At that date, the ASC became FASB’s officially recognized source of Variable Interest Entities,” resultedauthoritative GAAP applicable to all public and non-public non-governmental entities, superseding existing FASB, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Emerging Issues Task Force and related literature. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under the authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. All other accounting literature is considered non-authoritative. The switch to the ASC affects the way companies refer to GAAP in financial statements and accounting policies. Citing particular content in the deconsolidationASC involves specifying the unique numeric path to the content through the Topic, Subtopic, Section and Paragraph structure.
The following is a description of the Trust. The deconsolidation resulted in the derecognitionCompany’s significant accounting policies.
(a.) Principles of the $16.2 million in trust preferred securities and the recognition of $16.7 million in junior subordinated debentures and a $502,000 investment in the trust recorded in other assets in the Company’s consolidated statements of financial position.Consolidation
The consolidated financial information included herein combinesstatements include the resultsaccounts of operations, the assets, liabilities and shareholders’ equity of FIICompany and its subsidiaries. The Trust is not included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company. All significant inter-companyintercompany accounts and transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
The(b.) Use of Estimates
In preparing the consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordanceconformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and prevailing practices in the banking industry. In preparing the financial statements,GAAP, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amountsamount of assets and liabilities as of the date of the statement of financial condition and disclosurereported amounts of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported revenuesrevenue and expenses forduring the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. A material estimate that is particularly

57


susceptibleMaterial estimates relate to near-term change isthe determination of the allowance for loan losses, which is discussed in further detail later in this note.
Certain amountsassumptions used in the prior years’ consolidated financial statements are reclassified when necessary to conformdefined benefit pension plan accounting, the carrying value of goodwill and deferred tax assets, and the valuation and other than temporary impairment considerations related to the securities portfolio. These estimates and assumptions are based on management’s best estimates and judgment and are evaluated on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors, including the current year’s presentation.economic environment. The Company adjusts these estimates and assumptions when facts and circumstances dictate. Illiquid credit markets and volatile equity have combined with declines in consumer spending to increase the uncertainty inherent in these estimates and assumptions. As future events cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ significantly from the Company’s estimates.
(c.) Cash Flow Reporting
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows,equivalents include cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits in other banksbanks. Net cash flows are consideredreported for loans, deposit transactions and short-term borrowings.
Supplemental cash flow information is summarized as follows for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
             
  2009  2008  2007 
Cash paid during the year for:            
Interest expense $21,682  $37,160  $49,687 
Income taxes, net of income tax refunds  (1,312)  3,797   4,031 
Non-cash activity:            
Real estate and other assets acquired in settlement of loans $1,096  $1,185  $2,443 
Dividends declared and unpaid  1,692   1,497   1,805 
(Decrease) increase in net unsettled security purchases  (1,348)  1,453   336 
Loans securitized and sold  15,983       

- 68 -


FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and cash equivalents.2007
Securities(1.) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
The Company classifies its(d.) Investment Securities
Investment securities are classified as either available for sale or held to maturity at the time of purchase. Securitiesmaturity. Debt securities that the Companymanagement has the abilitypositive intent and intentability to hold to maturity are carried at amortized cost and classified as held to maturity. Securitiesmaturity and are recorded at amortized cost. Other investment securities are classified as available for sale are carriedand recorded at estimated fair value. Unrealizedvalue, with unrealized gains orand losses related to securities available for sale are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss),excluded from earnings and reported as a component of shareholders’ equity, netequity.
Purchase premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income using the interest method over the terms of the related deferred income tax effect.
Asecurities. Securities are evaluated periodically to determine whether a decline in their fair value is other than temporary. Management utilizes criteria such as, the current intent to hold or sell, the magnitude and duration of the decline and, when appropriate, consideration of negative changes in expected cash flows, creditworthiness, near term prospects of issuers, the level of credit subordination, estimated loss severity, and delinquencies, to determine whether a loss in value is other than temporary. The term “other than temporary” is not intended to indicate that the decline is permanent, but indicates that the prospect for a near-term recovery of value is not necessarily favorable. Declines in the fair value of any securityinvestment securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses to the extent the impairment is deemed other-than-temporaryrelated to credit issues or concerns, or the security is chargedintended to income resultingbe sold. The amount of impairment related to non-credit related factors is recognized in the establishment of a new cost basis for the security. Interest income includes interest earnedother comprehensive income. Gains and losses on the securities adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts on the related securities using the interest method. Realized gains or losses from the sale of available for sale securities are recognizedrecorded on the trade date and are determined using the specific identification method.
The Company classifies securities in the following categories:
U.S. treasury securities;
U.S. government agency securities;
U.S. government-sponsored enterprise (“GSE”(e.) securities;
Mortgage-backed pass-through securities (“MBS”), collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMO”) and other asset-backed securities (“ABS”);
State and municipal obligations;
Corporate bonds and other; and
Equity securities
Loans Held for Sale and Mortgage Banking Activities
Loans held for sale are recorded at the lower of aggregated cost or fair value, by category.value. If necessary, a valuation allowance is recorded by a charge to income for unrealized losses attributable to changes in market interest rates. Subsequent increases in fair value are adjusted through the valuation allowance, but only to the extent of the valuation allowance. Gains and losses on the disposition of loans held for sale are determined on the specific identification method. Loan servicing fees are recognized on an accrual basis.
The Company originates and sells certain residential real estate loans in the secondary market. The Company typically retains the right to service the mortgages upon sale. The Company makes the determination of whether or not to identify the mortgage as a loan held for sale at the time the application is received from the borrower based on the Company’s intent and ability to hold the loan.
Capitalized mortgage servicing rights are recorded at their fair value at the time a loan is sold and servicing rights are retained. Capitalized mortgage servicing rights are reported in other assets in the consolidated statements of financial position and are amortized to noninterest income in the consolidated statements of incomeoperations in proportion to and over the period of estimated net servicing income. The Company uses a valuation model that calculates the present value of future cash flows to determine the fair value of servicing rights. In using this valuation method, the Company incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in estimatingto estimate future net servicing

58


income, which include estimates of the cost to service the loan, the discount rate, an inflation rate and prepayment speeds. The carrying value of originated mortgage servicing rights is periodically evaluated for impairment. Impairment is determined by stratifying rights by predominant risk characteristics, such as interest rates and terms, using discounted cash flows and market-based assumptions. Impairment is recognized through a valuation allowance, to the extent that fair value is less than the capitalized asset. Subsequent increases in fair value are adjusted through the valuation allowance, but only to the extent of the valuation allowance.
The Company also extends rate lock commitments to borrowers related to the origination of residential mortgage loans. To mitigate the interest rate risk inherent in these rate lock commitments, as well as closed mortgage loans held for sale, the Company enters into forward sale commitments to sell individual mortgage loans. Rate lock and forward sale commitments are considered derivatives and are recorded at fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 133.value. These amounts were not significant at December 31, 2009 and 2008. The mortgage forward sale commitments are primarily with U.S. government agencies or government-sponsored enterprises, namely Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”), State of New York Mortgage Agency (“SONYMA”) andor Federal Housing Agency (“FHA”).
Mortgage banking activitiesLoan servicing income (a component of noninterest income in the consolidated statements of income) consistoperations) consists of fees earned for servicing mortgage loans sold to third parties, net gains (or net losses) recognized on sales of residential real state loans, and amortization expense and impairment losses recognized onassociated with capitalized mortgage servicing assets.
The Company also originates student loans and has a forward commitment to sell the student loans to a third-party at a fixed premium on the day of origination. The Company does not retain the right to service the loans upon sale.
During 2005, the Company decided to sell a substantial amount of commercial-related problem loans. The Company transferred the commercial-related loans to held for sale at the estimated fair value less costs to sell, which resulted in commercial-related charge-offs being recorded. The majority of the commercial-related loans held for sale were sold or settled during 2005 resulting in a net gain.
(f.) Loans
Loans are stated at the principal amount outstanding, net of unearned income and deferred direct loan origination fees and costs, which are accreted or amortized to interest income based on the interest method. Interest income on loans is recognized based on loan principal amounts outstanding at applicable interest rates. Accrual of interest on loans is suspended and all unpaid accrued interest is reversed when management believes that reasonable doubt exists with respect to the collectibility of principal or interest.

- 69 -


FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(1.) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Loans, including impaired loans, are generally classified as nonaccruingnon-accruing if they are past due as to maturity or payment of principal or interest for a period of more than 90 days, (120 days for consumer loans), unless such loans are well-collateralized and in the process of collection. Loans that are on a current payment status or past due less than 90 days may also be classified as nonaccruingnon-accruing if repayment in full of principal and/or interest is uncertain.
Loans may be returned to accrual status when all principal and interest amounts contractually due (including arrearages) are reasonably assured of repayment and there is a sustained period of repayment performance (generally a minimum of six months) in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan.
While a loan is classified as nonaccruing,non-accruing, payments received are generally used to reduce the principal balance. When the future collectibility of the recorded loan balance is expected, interest income may be recognized on a cash basis. In the case where a nonaccruingnon-accruing loan had been partially charged-off, recognition of interest on a cash basis is limited to that which would have been recognized on the recorded loan balance at the contractual interest rate. Interest collections in excess of that amount are recorded as recoveries to the allowance for loan losses until prior charge-offs have been fully recovered.
A loan isCommercial-related loans are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that a creditor will be unable to collect all amounts of principal and interest under the original terms of the agreement or the loan isand all loans that are restructured in a troubled debt restructuring. Accordingly, the Company evaluates impaired commercial and agricultural loans individually based on the present value of future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective

59


interest rate, or at the loan’s observable market price or the net realizablefair value of the collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent. The majority of the Company’s impaired loans are secured.collateral dependent.
(g.) Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is established through charges to earnings in the form of a provision for loan losses. When a loan or portion of a loan is determined to be uncollectible, the portion deemed uncollectible is charged against the allowance and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.
The Company periodically evaluates the allowance for loan losses in order to maintain the allowance at a level that represents management’s estimate of probable losses in the loan portfolio at the balance sheetstatement of financial condition date. Management’s evaluation of the allowance is based on a continuing review of the loan portfolio.
For larger balance commercial-related loans, the Company conducts a periodic assessment on a loan-by-loan basis of losses, when it is deemed probable, based upon known facts and circumstances, that full contractual interest and principal on an individual loan will not be collected in accordance with its contractual terms, and the loan is considered impaired. An impairment reserve is typically established based upon the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate, or as a practical expedient, at the loan’s observable market price or the fairnet realizable value of the collateral, ifas a majority of the loan isCompany’s impaired loans are collateral dependent. Generally, impaired loans include loans in nonaccruingnon-accruing status, loans that have been assigned a specific allowance for credit losses, loans that have been partially charged off, and loans designated as a troubled debt restructuring. Problem commercial loans are assigned various risk ratings under the allowance for credit losses methodology.Company’s loan monitoring procedures.
The allowance for loan losses for smaller balance homogeneous loans are estimated based on historical charge-off experience, levels and trends of delinquent and nonaccruingnon-accruing loans, trends in volume and terms, effects of changes in lending policy, the experience, ability and depth of management, national and local economic trends and conditions, and concentrations of credit risk.
The unallocated portion of the allowance for loan losses is based on management’s consideration of such elements as risks associated with variances in the rate of historical loss experiences, information risks associated with the dependence upon timely and accurate risk ratings on loans, and risks associated with the dependence on collateral valuation techniques.
While management evaluates currently available information in establishing the allowance for loan losses, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the evaluations. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review a financial institution’s allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the financial institution to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.
(h.) Company Owned Life Insurance
The Company holds life insurance policies on certain current and former employees. The Company is the owner and beneficiary of the policies. The cash surrender value of these policies is included as an asset on the consolidated statements of financial condition, and any increase in cash surrender value is recorded as noninterest income on the consolidated statements of operations. In the event of the death of an insured individual under these policies, the Company would receive a death benefit which would be recorded as noninterest income.

- 70 -


FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(1.) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
(i.) Premises and Equipment
Premises and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is computed on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The Company generally amortizes buildings and building improvements over a period of 15 to 39 years and furniture and equipment over a period of 3 to 10 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the lease term or the useful life of the improvements. Premises and equipment are periodically reviewed for impairment or when circumstances present indicators of impairment.
(j.) Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired in accordance with the purchase method of accounting for business combinations. Goodwill is not being amortized, but is required to be tested for impairment annually or more often if certain events occur. Goodwill impairment testing is performed at the segment (or “reporting unit”) level. Currently, the Company’s goodwill is evaluated at the entity level as there is only one reporting unit. Goodwill is assigned to reporting units at the date it is initially recorded. Once goodwill has been assigned to reporting units, it no longer retains its association with a particular acquisition, and if an event occurs or circumstances change that would make it more likely than not to reduceall of the fair value ofactivities within a reporting unit, below its carrying value. whether acquired or organically grown, are available to support the value of the goodwill.
Other intangible assets are being amortized on the straight-line method, over the expected periods to be benefited. Other intangible assets are periodically reviewed for impairment or when events or changed circumstances may affect the underlying basis of the assets.

60


(k.) Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) and Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”) Stock
The non-marketable investments in FHLB and FRB stock are included in other assets in the consolidated statements of financial condition at par value or cost and are periodically reviewed for impairment. The dividends received relative to these investments are included in other noninterest income in the consolidated statements of operations.
As a member of the FHLB system, the Company is required to maintain a specified investment in FHLB of New York (“FHLBNY”) stock in proportion to the volume of certain transactions with the FHLB. FHLBNY stock totaled $3.3 million and $3.2 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Deterioration in the soundness of the FHLB System may increase the potential that the investments in FHLB stock recorded on the Company’s consolidated statements of financial condition be designated as impaired and that the Company may incur a write-down in the future.
As a member of the FRB system, the Company is required to maintain a specified investment in FRB stock based on a ratio relative to the Company’s capital. FRB stock totaled $3.9 million and $2.8 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
(l.) Equity Method Investments
The Company has investments in limited partnerships and accounts for these investments under the equity method. These investments are included in other assets in the consolidated statements of financial condition and totaled $2.7 million and $2.4 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
(m.) Other Real Estate Owned
Other real estate owned consists of properties formerly pledged as collateral to loans, which have been acquired by the Company through foreclosure proceedings or acceptance of a deed in lieu of foreclosure. Upon transfer of a loan to foreclosure status, an appraisal is obtained and any difference of the loan balance over the fair value, less estimated costs to sell, is recorded against the allowance for loan losses. Other real estate owned is subsequently recorded at the lower of cost or fair value, less estimated costs to sell. Expenses and subsequent adjustments to the fair value are treated as other noninterest expense in the consolidated statements of income.operations.
Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”(n.) and Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”)Treasury Stock
The non-marketable investments in FHLB and FRBAcquisitions of treasury stock are includedrecorded at cost. The reissuance of shares in other assets in the consolidated statements of financial conditiontreasury is recorded at par value or cost and are periodically reviewed for impairment. The dividends received relative to these investments are included in other noninterest income in the consolidated statements of income.
As a member of the FHLB system, the Company is required to maintain a specified investment in FHLB stock in proportion to the volume of certain transactions with the FHLB. FHLB stock totaled $3.6 million and $4.4 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
As a member of the FRB system, the Company is required to maintain a specified investment in FRB stock based on a ratio relative to the Company’s capital. FRB stock totaled $2.8 million and $2.7 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Equity Method Investments
During 2002, the Company made a $2.4 million cash investment to acquire a 50% interest in Mercantile Adjustment Bureau, LLC, a full-service accounts receivable management firm located in Rochester, New York. The Company accounted for this investment using the equity method. During 2004, the Company sold its 50% interest in Mercantile Adjustment Bureau, LLC. As part of the transaction, the Company accepted a $300,000 term note and received $2.4 million in cash. The entire unpaid principal and interest on the term note is due and payable in June 2009.
The Company also has investments in limited partnerships and accounts for these investments under the equity method. These investments are included in other assets in the consolidated statements of financial position and totaled $1.9 million and $1.7 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Securities Sold Under Repurchase Agreements
Securities sold under repurchase agreements (“repurchase agreements”) are agreements in which the Company transfers the underlying securities to a third-party custodian’s account that explicitly recognizes the Company’s interest in the securities. The repurchase agreements are accounted for as secured financing transactions provided the Company maintains effective control over the transferred securities and meets other criteria as specified in Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 140. The Company’s repurchase agreements are accounted for as secured financings; accordingly, the transaction proceeds are reflected as liabilities and the securities underlying the repurchase agreements continue to be carried in the Company’s securities portfolio.weighted-average cost.

61

- 71 -


RetirementFINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and Postretirement Benefit Plans2007
(1.) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
(o.) Employee Benefits
The Company participates in a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan and defined contribution profit sharing (401(k)) plan benefits are expensed as applicablefor certain employees earn benefits. The recognition of defined benefit pension plan and postretirement plan expense is significantly impacted by estimates made by management such as discount rates used to value certain liabilities and expected return on assets.who met participation requirements. The Company uses third-party specialistsalso provides post-retirement benefits, principally health and dental care, to assist management in appropriately measuringemployees of a previously acquired entity. The Company has closed the expense associated with the defined benefit pension and postretirementpost-retirement plans to new participants. The actuarially determined pension benefit plans.
Effective December 31, 2006,is based on years of service and the Company adopted certain provisionsemployee’s highest average compensation during five consecutive years of SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans – an amendmentemployment. The Company’s policy is to at least fund the minimum amount required by the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)1974 (“ERISA”).” SFAS No. 158 requires the Company to recognize the over-funded status (asset) or under-funded status (liability) The cost of its defined benefitthe pension and postretirement benefitpost-retirement plans are based on itsactuarial computations of current and future benefits for employees, and is charged to noninterest expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
The Company recognizes an asset or a liability for a plans’ overfunded status or underfunded status, respectively, in the consolidated financial positionstatements and reports changes in the funded status as an adjustment to accumulateda component of other comprehensive income, (loss).
Stock Compensation Plans
net of applicable taxes, in the year in which changes occur. Prior to January 1, 2006,2008, the Company accountedassets and obligations that determine future funded status were measured as of September 30 of each year. Beginning in 2008, the measurement date was changed to December 31 to coincide with the end of the Company’s fiscal year. The effect of changing the measurement date resulted in a $43 thousand increase to retained earnings.
(p.) Share-Based Compensation Plans
Compensation expense for stock-based compensation under the recognitionstock options and measurement provisions of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” as permitted by SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adoptedrestricted stock awards is based on the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment”the award on the measurement date, which, for the Company, is the date of grant and is recognized ratably over the service period of the award. The fair value of stock options is estimated using the modified-prospective transition method. Under that transition method, compensation cost recognized in 2006 included compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested asBlack-Scholes option-pricing model. The fair value of January 1, 2006, and those granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, basedrestricted stock awards is generally the market price of the Company’s stock on the grant-date fair value estimatedate of grant.
Share-based compensation expense is included in accordance with the provisionsconsolidated statements of SFAS No. 123(R).
The following table illustrates the effect on net earningsoperations under salaries and earnings per share as if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provision of SFAS No. 123employee benefits for awards granted to stock-based compensation during the years ended December 31, 2005management and 2004:
         
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) 2005  2004 
 
Reported net income $2,166  $12,493 
         
Less: Total stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects (1)  348   307 
       
         
Pro forma net income  1,818   12,186 
         
Less: Preferred stock dividends  1,488   1,495 
       
         
Pro forma net income available to common shareholders $330  $10,691 
       
         
Basic income per share:        
Reported $0.06  $0.98 
Pro forma  0.03   0.96 
         
Diluted income per share:        
Reported $0.06  $0.98 
Pro forma  0.03   0.95 
(1)For purposes of this pro forma disclosure, the value of the stock-based compensation is amortized to expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting periods.
in other noninterest expense for awards granted to directors.
(q.) Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for underusing the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and thetheir respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities

62


are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. NetA valuation allowance is recognized on deferred tax assets are periodically evaluatedif, based upon the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the assets may not be realized. The Company recognizes interest and/or penalties related to determine if a valuation allowance is required.income tax matters in income tax expense.
(r.) Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted new authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 260, “Earnings Per Share,” which provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. The Company has determined that its outstanding non-vested stock awards are participating securities. Accordingly, effective January 1, 2009, earnings per common share is computed using the two-class method prescribed under FASB ASC Topic 260. All previously reported earnings per common share data has been retrospectively adjusted to conform to the new computation method. The adoption and resulting adjustments to conform to the new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Under the two-class method, basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net earnings allocated to common stock by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the applicable period, excluding outstanding participating securities. Diluted earnings per common share is computed using the weighted-average number of shares determined for the basic earnings per common share computation plus the dilutive effect of stock compensation using the treasury stock method. A reconciliation of the weighted-average shares used in calculating basic earnings per common share and the weighted average common shares used in calculating diluted earnings per common share for the reported periods is provided in Note 15 - Earnings (Loss) Per Share.

- 72 -


FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(1.) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
(s.) Financial Instruments Withwith Off-Balance Sheet Risk
The Company’s financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk are commercial stand-by letters of credit and mortgage, home equity and commercial loan commitments. These financial instruments are reflected in the statements of financial condition upon funding.
Financial Services Group (“FSG”(t.) Fees and CommissionsRecent Accounting Pronouncements
FSG feesFASB ASC 105 “Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” establishes the Codification as the single source of authoritative GAAP except for rules and commissions are derived from sales of investment products and services to customers and from trust services provided to customers prior to the saleinterpretive releases of the trust relationships during the third quarterSEC, which are sources of 2006. Fees and commissions are recorded on the accrual basis of accounting. Assets held in fiduciary or agency capacitiesauthoritative GAAP for customers were not included in the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition, since such items are not assets of the Company.
Segment Information
In accordance with theSEC registrants. The provisions of SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,” the Company’s primary reportable segment is its subsidiary bank, Five Star Bank (“FSB”). During 2005, the Company completed a strategic realignment, which involved the merger of its subsidiary banks into a single state-chartered bank, FSB. FSG was also deemed a reportable segment in prior years, as the Company evaluated the performance of this line of business separately. However, with the sale of BGI during 2005, the FSG segment no longer meets the thresholds included in SFAS No. 131 for separation.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), “Share Based Payment,” which revised SFAS No. 123 and superseded APB Opinion No. 25. SFAS No. 123(R) requires companies to recognize in the income statement, over the requisite service period, the estimated grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation issued to employees and directors using option pricing models, which eliminates the ability to account for stock options under the intrinsic value method prescribed by APB Opinion No. 25 and allowed under the original provisions of SFAS No. 123. The CompanyASC 105 were adopted this statement effective January 1, 2006 and chose to apply the modified-prospective transition method. Accordingly, awards granted, modified or settled after January 1, 2006 are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R) and any unvested equity awards granted prior to that date are recognized in the consolidated statements of income as service is rendered based on their grant-date fair value calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 123. The disclosures required by SFAS No. 123(R) are included in Note 14 and the pro forma expense disclosures for the years ended December 31, 2005period ending September 30, 2009 and 2004 are disclosed in the “Stock Compensation Plans” section of Note 1.
In November 2005, the FASB issued Staff Position No. FAS 115-1 and FAS 124-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments” (the “FSP”). The FSP addresses the determination of when an investment is considered impaired; whether the impairment is other-than-temporary; and how to measure an impairment loss. The FSP also addresses accounting considerations subsequent to the recognition of an other-than-temporary impairment on a debt security, and requires certain disclosures about unrealized losses that have not been recognized as other-than-temporary impairments. The FSP replaces the impairment guidance in Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 03-1 with references to existing authoritative literature concerning other-than-temporary determinations (principally SFAS No. 115 and Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin 59). Under the FSP, impairment losses must be recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the security’s cost and its fair value at the financial statement date, without considering partial recoveries subsequent to that date. The FSP requires that an investor recognize an other-than-temporary impairment loss when it determines that an impaired security will not fully recover prior to the expected time of sale or maturity. The Company adopted the FSP effective January 1, 2006

63


and adoption did not have ana material effect on itsthe Company’s consolidated financial position, consolidated resultsstatements.
FASB ASC 810-10-25, the consolidation guidance related to variable interest entities (“VIEs”), was amended to modify the approach used to evaluate VIEs and add disclosure requirements about an enterprise’s involvement with VIEs. These provisions are effective at the beginning of operations, or liquidity.
In February 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 155, “Accountingan entity’s annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009 and for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments.” SFAS No. 155 amends SFAS No. 133 and SFAS No. 140, and improves the financial reporting of certain hybrid financial instruments by requiring more consistent accountinginterim periods within that eliminates exemptions and provides a means to simplify the accounting for these instruments. Specifically, SFAS No. 155 allows financial instruments that have embedded derivatives to be accounted for as a whole (eliminating the need to bifurcate the derivative from its host) if the holder elects to account for the whole instrument on a fair value basis. SFAS No. 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued in fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006.period. The Company plans to adopt this statement effective January 1, 2007 and does not expect the adoption of this consolidation guidance to have a material effect on its consolidated financial position, consolidated resultsstatements.
FASB ASC 860 “Transfers and Servicing” was amended to eliminate the concept of operations, or liquidity.
In March 2006,a “qualifying special-purpose entity” and change the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, “Accountingrequirements for Servicingderecognizing financial assets. The amendment requires additional disclosures intended to provide greater transparency about transfers of Financial Assets,”financial assets, including securitization transactions, and an amendment of SFAS No. 140, which requires that all separately recognized servicing assetsentity’s continuing involvement in and servicing liabilities be initially measured at fair value, if practicable and permitsexposure to the entitiesrisks related to elect either fair value measurement with changes in fair value reflected in earnings or the amortization and impairment requirements of SFAS No. 140 for subsequent measurement. SFAS No. 156transferred financial assets. This updated guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after SeptemberNovember 15, 2006. Earlier adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an entity’s fiscal year, provided the entity has not yet issued financial statements, including interim financial statements for any period of that fiscal year.2009. The Company did not elect for early adoption and plans to adopt this statement effective January 1, 2007 and does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material effect on its consolidated financial position, consolidated resultsstatements.
FASB ASC 825-10-65 “Financial Instruments”, FASB ASC 320-10-65 “Investments-Debt and Equity Securities”, and FASB ASC 820-10-65, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” provide additional guidance on fair value measurements and impairments of operations, or liquidity.
In June 2006,securities. FASB issuedASC 825-10-65 requires that the fair value of all financial instruments be disclosed in both interim and annual reporting periods. FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretationASC 320-10-65 modifies the criteria used to assess other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 prescribesdebt securities and collectability of cash flows, bifurcates the recognition of OTTI between earnings and other comprehensive income, and requires expanded and more frequent disclosures about OTTI. At the time of adoption, management concluded that previously recorded impairment charges resulted from securities impaired due to reasons of credit quality. As a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expectedresult, no cumulative-effect adjustments were required to be takenrecorded at adoption. FASB ASC 820-10-65 permits adjustments to estimated fair values of assets and liabilities when, due to a significant decrease in the volume and level of market activity or evidence that a tax return,market is not orderly, and also provideswhen the valuation technique used does not fairly represent the price at which willing market participants would transact at the measurement date under current market conditions. In addition, FASB ASC 820-10 -65 requires disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair values for both interim and annual reporting periods. The recent accounting guidance in the preceding three FASB ASC’s was adopted for the reporting period ending June 30, 2009 and did not have a material effect on derecognition, classification, interestthe Company’s consolidated financial statements.
FASB ASC 715-20-65 “Compensation — Retirement Benefits” expands the disclosure requirements for plan assets of defined benefit pensions or other postretirement plans. For plans subject to this statement, entities are required to provide more detailed information about (1) investment policies and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure,strategies, (2) categories of plan assets, (3) fair value measurements of plan assets, and transition. FIN 48(4) significant concentrations of risk. FASB ASC 715-20-65 is effective for fiscal years beginningending after December 15, 2006.2009. The provisions of this FASB ASC were adopted for the reporting period ending December 31, 2009 and the required disclosures are reported in Note 16 — Employee Benefit Plans. Additional new authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 715, “Compensation—Retirement Benefits,” requires the recognition of a liability and related compensation expense for endorsement split-dollar life insurance policies that provide a benefit to an employee that extends to post-retirement periods. Under ASC Topic 715, life insurance policies purchased for the purpose of providing such benefits do not effectively settle an entity’s obligation to the employee. Accordingly, the entity must recognize a liability and related compensation expense during the employee’s active service period based on the future cost of insurance to be incurred during the employee’s retirement. The Company plans to adopt this statement effectiveadopted the new authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 715 on January 1, 20072008 as a change in accounting principle through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings totaling $284 thousand.

- 73 -


FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and does2007
(1.) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
FASB ASC 815-10-65 “Derivatives and Hedging” expands the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. For instruments subject to this FASB ASC, entities are required to disclose how and why such instruments are being used, where values, gains and losses are reported within financial statements, and the existence and nature of credit-risk-related contingent features. Additionally, entities are required to provide more specific disclosures about the volume of their derivative activity. The accounting guidance in this FASB ASC was adopted on January 1, 2009 and did not expect adoption to have a material effect on itsthe Company’s consolidated financial position, consolidated results of operations, or liquidity.statements.
In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”(2.) No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements.” SAB No. 108 addresses how the effects of uncorrected misstatements should be considered when quantifying misstatements in current year financial statements. SAB No. 108 requires companies to quantify misstatements using a balance sheetINVESTMENT SECURITIES
The amortized cost and income statement approach and to evaluate whether either approach results in quantifying an error that is material in light of relevant quantitative and qualitative factors. SAB No. 108 is effective for the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 and application did not have an effect on consolidated financial position, consolidated results of operations, or liquidity.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS No. 157 definesestimated fair value establishes a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement, and states that a fair value measurement should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The Company is required to adopt SFAS No. 157 for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company plans to adopt this statement on January 1, 2008 and is currently assessing the impact that the adoption will have on its consolidated financial position, consolidated results of operations, or liquidity.investment securities are summarized below (in thousands).
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans — an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R).” SFAS No. 158 requires companies to recognize the over-funded or under-funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan (other than a multi-employer plan) as an asset or liability in its balance sheet and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income. The Company adopted this provision of SFAS No. 158 for the year ended December 31, 2006 and the required disclosures are included in
                 
  December 31, 2009 
  Amortized  Unrealized  Unrealized  Fair 
  Cost  Gains  Losses  Value 
Securities available for sale:
                
U.S. Government agencies and government sponsored enterprises $134,564  $86  $545  $134,105 
State and political subdivisions  80,812   2,850   3   83,659 
Mortgage-backed securities:                
Federal National Mortgage Association  75,108   629   259   75,478 
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation  37,321   413   56   37,678 
Government National Mortgage Association  110,576   97   342   110,331 
Collateralized mortgage obligations:                
Federal National Mortgage Association  16,274   250   94   16,430 
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation  20,879   504   14   21,369 
Government National Mortgage Association  95,886   56   873   95,069 
Privately issued  5,087   403   330   5,160 
             
Total collateralized mortgage obligations  138,126   1,213   1,311   138,028 
             
Total mortgage-backed securities  361,131   2,352   1,968   361,515 
Asset-backed securities  1,295   171   244   1,222 
             
Total available for sale securities $577,802  $5,459  $2,760  $580,501 
             
                 
Securities held to maturity:
                
State and political subdivisions $39,573  $1,056  $  $40,629 
             

64

- 74 -


Note 13. SFAS No. 158 also requires companies to measure the funded status of a plan as of the date of the company’s fiscal year-end, with limited exceptions. The Company is requiredFINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and plans to adopt this provision2007
(2.) INVESTMENT SECURITIES (Continued)
                 
  December 31, 2008 
  Amortized  Unrealized  Unrealized  Fair 
  Cost  Gains  Losses  Value 
Securities available for sale:
                
U.S. Government agencies and government sponsored enterprises $67,871  $609  $307  $68,173 
State and political subdivisions  129,572   2,181   42   131,711 
Mortgage-backed securities:                
Federal National Mortgage Association  136,348   3,725   86   139,987 
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation  94,960   2,649   14   97,595 
Government National Mortgage Association  1,926   17   25   1,918 
Collateralized mortgage obligations:                
Federal National Mortgage Association  17,856   74   642   17,288 
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation  44,838   334   214   44,958 
Government National Mortgage Association  1,350   9      1,359 
Privately issued  42,296   5   2,854   39,447 
             
Total collateralized mortgage obligations  106,340   422   3,710   103,052 
             
Total mortgage-backed securities  339,574   6,813   3,835   342,552 
Asset-backed securities  3,918         3,918 
Equity securities  923   281   52   1,152 
             
Total available for sale securities $541,858  $9,884  $4,236  $547,506 
             
                 
Securities held to maturity:
                
State and political subdivisions $58,532  $619  $4  $59,147 
             
Interest and dividends on securities for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008 and does not expect adoption to have a material effect on its consolidated financial position, consolidated results of operations, or liquidity.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115.” SFAS No. 159 allows entities to irrevocably elect fair value as the initial and subsequent measurement attribute for certain financial assets and financial liabilities that are not otherwise required to be measured at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings as they occur. SFAS No. 159 also requires entities to report those financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value in a manner that separates those reported fair values from the carrying amounts of similar assets and liabilities measured using another measurement attribute on the face of the statement of financial position. Lastly, SFAS No. 159 establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to improve comparability between entities that elect different measurement attributes for similar assets and liabilities. The Company is required to adopt SFAS No. 159 for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, with early adoption permitted if an entity also early adopts the provisions of SFAS No. 157. The Company plans to adopt this statement on January 1, 2008 and is currently assessing the impact the adoption will have on its consolidated financial position, consolidated results of operations, or liquidity.
(2) Discontinued Operation
In 2005, the Company decided to dispose of its BGI subsidiary. The results of BGI have been reported separately as a discontinued operation in the consolidated statements of income. As a result, the Company recorded a loss from operations of the discontinued subsidiary of $340,000, a loss on the sale of BGI of $1.1 million and income tax expense associated with discontinued operations of $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. Since the2009, 2008 and 2007 is summarized as follows (in thousands):
             
  2009  2008  2007 
Taxable interest $16,466  $21,882  $25,414 
Tax-exempt interest  5,228   8,773   9,576 
          
Total interest and dividends on securities $21,694  $30,655  $34,990 
          
Sales of securities available for sale occurred during 2005, there are no assets or liabilities associated with the discontinued operation recorded in the consolidated statements of financial condition at were as follows (in thousands):
             
  2009  2008  2007 
Proceeds from sales $224,928  $58,368  $49,350 
Gross realized gains  6,826   291   209 
Gross realized losses  3,397   3   2 

- 75 -


FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 20062009, 2008 and 2005. Cash flows from BGI are shown in the consolidated statements of cash flows by activity (operating, investing and financing) consistent with the applicable source of the cash flow.2007
(3) Securities(2.) INVESTMENT SECURITIES (Continued)
The aggregate amortized cost and fair valuescheduled maturities of securities available for sale and securities held to maturity are as follows at December 31:
                 
(Dollars in thousands) 2006 
  Amortized  Gross Unrealized  Fair 
  Cost  Gains  Losses  Value 
 
Securities available for sale:                
GSE $235,724  $59  $3,987  $231,796 
MBS, CMO and ABS  308,141   106   8,204   300,043 
State and municipal obligations  198,428   1,272   1,390   198,310 
Corporate bonds and other  3,913      1   3,912 
Equity securities  80   1,007      1,087 
             
                 
Total securities available for sale $746,286  $2,444  $13,582  $735,148 
             
                 
Securities held to maturity:                
State and municipal obligations $40,388  $157  $124  $40,421 
             
                 
Total securities held to maturity $40,388  $157  $124  $40,421 
             

65


                 
(Dollars in thousands) 2005 
  Amortized  Gross Unrealized  Fair 
  Cost  Gains  Losses  Value 
 
Securities available for sale:                
GSE $256,827  $122  $5,014  $251,935 
MBS, CMO and ABS  324,399   297   7,069   317,627 
State and municipal obligations  219,824   2,179   1,743   220,260 
Equity securities  81   952      1,033 
             
                 
Total securities available for sale $801,131  $3,550  $13,826  $790,855 
             
                 
Securities held to maturity:                
State and municipal obligations $42,593  $479  $174  $42,898 
             
                 
Total securities held to maturity $42,593  $479  $174  $42,898 
             
Interest and dividends on securities totaled $32.8 million, $30.8 million and $27.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Taxable interest and dividend income totaled $23.9 million, $22.2 million and $19.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Non-taxable interest and dividend income totaled $8.9 million, $8.6 million and $8.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities by contractual maturity follow at December 31:
                 
(Dollars in thousands) 2006 
  Available for Sale  Held to Maturity 
  Amortized  Fair  Amortized  Fair 
  Cost  Value  Cost  Value 
 
Due in one year or less $97,157  $96,778  $30,440  $30,387 
Due in one to five years  342,134   336,434   6,832   6,838 
Due in five to ten years  117,563   115,208   2,198   2,250 
Due after ten years  189,352   185,641   918   946 
             
                 
  $746,206  $734,061  $40,388  $40,421 
             
Maturities of MBS, CMO and ABS2009 are classified in accordance with the contractual repayment schedules, however actualshown below. Actual expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities for these types of securities sincebecause issuers generallymay have the right to call or prepay obligations.obligations (in thousands).
During 2006, proceeds from sale
         
  Amortized  Fair 
  Cost  Value 
Debt securities available for sale:
        
Due in one year or less $52,541  $53,081 
Due from one to five years  169,933   172,584 
Due after five years through ten years  52,153   52,685 
Due after ten years  303,175   302,151 
       
  $577,802  $580,501 
       
Debt securities held to maturity:
        
Due in one year or less $30,238  $30,474 
Due from one to five years  7,361   7,877 
Due after five years through ten years  1,542   1,763 
Due after ten years  432   515 
       
  $39,573  $40,629 
       
The following tables show the investments’ gross unrealized losses (excluding unrealized losses that have been written down through the consolidated statements of securities available for sale were $1.7 million, realized gross gains were $30,000operations) and there were no gross losses. During 2005, proceeds from sale of securities available for sale were $2.4 million, realized gross gains were $14,000fair value, aggregated by investment category and there were no gross losses. During 2004, proceeds from sale of securities available for sale were $40.9 million, realized gross gains were $248,000 and there were no gross losses.
Securities held to maturity and available for sale with carrying values of $544.8 million and $560.8 million were pledged as collateral for municipal deposits and repurchase agreements at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Information on temporarily impaired securities segregated according to the periodlength of time suchthat individual securities werehave been in a continuous unrealized loss position is summarized as follows at December 31:31, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands).
                         
  December 31, 2009 
  Less than 12 months  12 months or longer  Total 
  Fair  Unrealized  Fair  Unrealized  Fair  Unrealized 
  Value  Losses  Value  Losses  Value  Losses 
Securities available for sale:
                        
U.S. Government agencies and government sponsored enterprises $83,480  $360  $10,003  $185  $93,483  $545 
State and political subdivisions        150   3   150   3 
Mortgage-backed securities:                        
Federal National Mortgage Association  24,964   258   643   1   25,607   259 
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation  5,627   56         5,627   56 
Government National Mortgage Association  55,304   342         55,304   342 
Collateralized mortgage obligations:                        
Federal National Mortgage Association  353   2   5,384   92   5,737   94 
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation  490   1   814   13   1,304   14 
Government National Mortgage Association  79,645   873         79,645   873 
Privately issued        2,985   330   2,985   330 
                   
Total collateralized mortgage obligations  80,488   876   9,183   435   89,671   1,311 
                   
Total mortgage-backed securities  166,383   1,532   9,826   436   176,209   1,968 
Asset-backed securities  278   244         278   244 
                   
Total temporarily impaired securities
 $250,141  $2,136  $19,979  $624  $270,120  $2,760 
                   
There were no unrealized losses in held to maturity securities at December 31, 2009.

66

- 76 -


                         
(Dollars in thousands) 2006 
  Less than  12 Months    
  12 Months  or Longer  Total 
  Fair  Unrealized  Fair  Unrealized  Fair  Unrealized 
  Value  Losses  Value  Losses  Value  Losses 
 
Securities available for sale:                        
GSE $5,231  $36  $223,565  $3,951  $228,796  $3,987 
MBS, CMO and ABS  45,967   627   233,972   7,577   279,939   8,204 
State and municipal obligations  15,004   38   89,258   1,352   104,262   1,390 
Corporate bonds and other  3,912   1         3,912   1 
                   
                         
Total securities available for sale  70,114   702   546,795   12,880   616,909   13,582 
 
Securities held to maturity:                        
State and municipal obligations  27,706   69   3,495   55   31,201   124 
                   
                         
Total temporarily impaired securities $97,820  $771  $550,290  $12,935  $648,110  $13,706 
                   
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
                         
(Dollars in thousands) 2005 
  Less than  12 Months    
  12 Months  or Longer  Total 
  Fair  Unrealized  Fair  Unrealized  Fair  Unrealized 
  Value  Losses  Value  Losses  Value  Losses 
 
Securities available for sale:                        
GSE $95,853  $1,403  $141,975  $3,611  $237,828  $5,014 
MBS, CMO and ABS  180,971   2,984   110,774   4,085   291,745   7,069 
State and municipal obligations  72,726   834   33,546   909   106,272   1,743 
                   
                         
Total securities available for sale  349,550   5,221   286,295   8,605   635,845   13,826 
 
Securities held to maturity:                        
State and municipal obligations  23,955   169   235   5   24,190   174 
                   
                         
Total temporarily impaired securities $373,505  $5,390  $286,530  $8,610  $660,035  $14,000 
                   
(2.) INVESTMENT SECURITIES (Continued)
                         
  December 31, 2008 
  Less than 12 months  12 months or longer  Total 
  Fair  Unrealized  Fair  Unrealized  Fair  Unrealized 
  Value  Losses  Value  Losses  Value  Losses 
Securities available for sale:
                        
U.S. Government agencies and government sponsored enterprises $50  $1  $11,704  $306  $11,754  $307 
State and political subdivisions  6,191   41   84   1   6,275   42 
Mortgage-backed securities:                        
Federal National Mortgage Association  10,432   65   484   21   10,916   86 
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation  5,533   14         5,533   14 
Government National Mortgage Association  227   3   1,059   22   1,286   25 
Collateralized mortgage obligations:                        
Federal National Mortgage Association  828   1   7,181   641   8,009   642 
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation        7,224   214   7,224   214 
Privately issued  24,425   2,045   10,975   809   35,400   2,854 
                   
Total collateralized mortgage obligations  25,253   2,046   25,380   1,664   50,633   3,710 
                   
Total mortgage-backed securities  41,445   2,128   26,923   1,707   68,368   3,835 
Equity securities  310   52         310   52 
                   
Total available for sale securities  47,996   2,222   38,711   2,014   86,707   4,236 
                   
                         
Securities held to maturity:
                        
State and political subdivisions  554   4         554   4 
                   
Total temporarily impaired securities
 $48,550  $2,226  $38,711  $2,014  $87,261  $4,240 
                   
The tables above represent 1,173 and 1,113 ofCompany reviews investment securities whereon an ongoing basis for the currentpresence of other-than-temporary-impairment (“OTTI”) with formal reviews performed quarterly. Declines in the fair value of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses to the extent the impairment is lessrelated to credit issues or concerns, or the security is intended to be sold. The amount of the impairment related to non-credit related factors is recognized in other comprehensive income. Evaluating whether the impairment of a debt security is other than temporary involves assessing i.) the relatedintent to sell the debt security or ii.) the likelihood of being required to sell the security before the recovery of its amortized cost asbasis. In determining whether the other-than temporary impairment includes a credit loss, the Company uses its best estimate of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The securities in an unrealized loss position for twelve months or longer totaled 842 and 348 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment on a quarterly basis, or as economic or market concerns warrantthe present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the debt security considering factors such evaluation. Consideration is given to (1)as: a.) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than the amortized cost (2)basis, b.) adverse conditions specifically related to the financial conditionsecurity, an industry, or a geographic area, c.) the historical and near-term prospectsimplied volatility of the fair value of the security, d.) the payment structure of the debt security and the likelihood of the issuer being able to make payments that increase in the future, e.) failure of the issuer of the security to make scheduled interest or principal payments, f.) any changes to the rating of the security by a rating agency, and (3)g.) recoveries or additional declines in fair value subsequent to the balance sheet date.
The following summarizes the amounts of OTTI recognized during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 by investment category. There was no OTTI recognized in 2007 (in thousands).
         
  2009  2008 
Mortgage-backed securities — Privately issued whole loan CMOs $2,353  $5,918 
Asset-backed securities — Trust preferred securities  2,313   29,974 
Equity securities — Auction rate securities     32,323 
       
  $4,666  $68,215 
       
As of December 31, 2009, management does not have the intent and abilityto sell any of the Companysecurities in a loss position and believes that it is likely that it will not be required to retain its investment insell any such securities before the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.of amortized cost. The unrealized losses presented above do not reflect deterioration in the credit worthiness of the issuing securities and result primarily from fluctuationsare largely due to increases in market interest rates.rates over the yields available at the time the underlying securities were purchased. The Company has the ability and intent to hold these securities until their fair value recoversis expected to recover as the bonds approach their amortized cost, therefore management has determined that the securities that were in an unrealized loss position at December 31, 2006, and 2005 represent only temporary declines in fair value.
(4) Loans Heldmaturity date or repricing date or if market yields for Sale
During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company transferred $169.0 million in commercial-related loans to held for sale, at an estimated fair value less costs to sell of $132.3 million. As a result, $36.7 million in commercial-related charge-offs were recorded. Subsequent to the transfer date, the Company decided not to proceed with the sale of $613,000 of these commercial-related loans held for sale and returned the loans to portfolio at the lower of cost or fair value. In the second half of 2005, the Company realized a net gain of $9.4 million on the ultimate sale or settlement of commercial-related loans held for sale.such investments decline.

67

- 77 -


A summaryFINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(2.) INVESTMENT SECURITIES (Continued)
Management does not believe any of loansthe securities in a loss position are impaired due to reasons of credit quality. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2009, management has concluded that unrealized losses on its investment securities are temporary and no further impairment loss has been realized in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.
Further deterioration in credit quality and/or a continuation of the current imbalances in liquidity that exist in the marketplace might adversely effect the fair values of the Company’s investment portfolio and may increase the potential that certain unrealized losses will be designated as other than temporary in future periods and that the Company will incur additional write-downs in the future.
(3.) LOANS HELD FOR SALE AND MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS
Loans held for sale iswere entirely comprised of residential real estate mortgages and totaled $421 thousand and $1.0 million as follows atof December 31:31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
         
(Dollars in thousands) 2006  2005 
 
Commercial and agricultural * $  $577 
Residential real estate  992   676 
       
 
Total loans held for sale $992  $1,253 
       
*All commercial and agricultural loans held for sale are in nonaccruing status.
The Company sells certain qualifying newly originated or refinanced residential real estate mortgages on the secondary market. Residential real estate mortgages serviced for others, amounting to $355.2 million and $377.6 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively,which are not included in the consolidated statements of financial condition. Proceeds from the sale of loans held for sale (excluding commercial-related) were $69.5 million, $86.3.condition, amounted to $349.8 million and $66.5$315.7 million for the years endedas of December 31, 2006, 20052009 and 2004,2008, respectively. Net gain on the sale of loans held for sale (excluding commercial-related) was $973,000, $776,000 and $910,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
The activity in capitalized mortgage servicing assets, included in other assets in the consolidated statements of financial condition, is summarized as follows for the years ended December 31:31 (in thousands):
             
(Dollars in thousands) 2006  2005  2004 
 
Mortgage servicing assets at beginning of year $1,557  $1,946  $2,294 
 
Originations  224   309   451 
Amortization  (616)  (698)  (799)
          
             
Mortgage servicing assets at end of year  1,165   1,557   1,946 
 
Valuation allowance  (2)  (3)  (70)
          
             
Mortgage servicing assets at end of year, net $1,163  $1,554  $1,876 
          
             
  2009  2008  2007 
Mortgage servicing assets, beginning of year $925  $1,000  $1,165 
Originations  952   230   307 
Amortization  (343)  (305)  (472)
          
Mortgage servicing assets, end of year  1,534   925   1,000 
Valuation allowance  (185)  (362)  (19)
          
Mortgage servicing assets, net, end of year $1,349  $563  $981 
          
During 2009 the Company pooled $16.0 million of one-to-four family residential mortgage loans and converted the loans to FHLMC securities. The Company retained servicing responsibilities for this securitization. The mortgage-backed securities received in exchange for the loans were classified as available-for-sale and subsequently sold. The $564 thousand gain recognized on the sale of the securities is included in the consolidated statements of operations under net gain on disposal of investment securities. The Company did not securitize any loans in 2008 or 2007.
(5) Loans(4.) LOANS
Loans outstanding,receivable, including net unearned income and net deferred fees and costs of $4.5$16.5 million and $3.3$12.3 million atas of December 31, 20062009 and 2005,December 31, 2008, respectively, are summarized as follows:follows (in thousands):
                
(Dollars in thousands) 2006 2005 
 2009 2008 
Commercial $105,806 $116,444  $186,386 $158,543 
Commercial real estate 243,966 264,727  308,873 262,234 
Agricultural 56,808 75,018  41,872 44,706 
Residential real estate 268,446 274,487  144,215 177,683 
Consumer and home equity 251,456 261,645 
     
Consumer indirect 352,611 255,054 
Consumer direct and home equity 230,049 222,859 
      
Total loans 926,482 992,321  1,264,006 1,121,079 
Less: Allowance for loan losses 20,741 18,749 
      
Allowance for loan losses  (17,048)  (20,231)
Total loans, net $1,243,265 $1,102,330 
          
 
Loans, net $909,434 $972,090 
     
The Company’s significant concentrations of credit risk in the loan portfolio relate to a geographic concentration pertaining toin the communities that the Company serves.

68

- 78 -


FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(4.) LOANS (Continued)
The table below details additional information on the loan portfolio as of December 31 of the year indicated (in thousands):
             
  2009  2008  2007 
Non-accruing loans $6,822  $8,189  $8,075 
Interest income that would have been recorded if loans had been performing in accordance with original terms  388   546   713 
Accruing loans 90 days or more delinquent  1,859   7   2 
Balance of impaired loans, end of period  2,938   3,180   4,132 
Balance of impaired loans requiring a specific allowance, end of period  1,932   599   1,572 
Allowance relating to impaired loans included in allowance for loan losses  854   142   454 
Average balance of impaired loans  3,785   3,088   6,446 
Interest income recognized on impaired loans  69       
There were no restructured loans outstanding at December 31, 2009 or 2008.
The following table sets forth the changes in the allowance for loan losses for the years ended December 31:31 (in thousands):
             
(Dollars in thousands) 2006  2005  2004 
 
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of year $20,231  $39,186  $29,064 
             
Loan charge-offs  4,199   49,286   10,797 
Loan recoveries  2,858   1,799   1,243 
          
Net charge-offs  1,341   47,487   9,554 
             
(Credit) provision for loan losses  (1,842)  28,532   19,676 
          
             
Allowance for loan losses at end of year $17,048  $20,231  $39,186 
          
The following table sets forth information regarding nonaccruing loans and other nonperforming assets at December 31:
         
(Dollars in thousands) 2006  2005 
 
Nonaccruing loans:        
Commercial $2,205  $4,389 
Commercial real estate  4,661   6,985 
Agricultural  4,836   2,786 
Residential real estate  3,602   3,096 
Consumer and home equity  533   505 
       
Total nonaccruing loans  15,837   17,761 
         
Accruing loans 90 days or more delinquent  3   276 
       
         
Total nonperforming loans  15,840   18,037 
         
Other real estate owned (“ORE”)  1,203   1,099 
       
         
Total nonperforming loans and ORE  17,043   19,136 
         
Nonaccruing commercial-related loans held for sale     577 
       
 
Total nonperforming assets $17,043  $19,713 
       
During the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the amount of interest income forgone on nonaccruing loans outstanding at the respective year-ends totaled $1.5 million, $1.4 million and $4.8 million, respectively.
Impaired loans, all of which were assigned a specific allowance for loan losses, totaled $11.7 million and $14.2 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The total specific allowance for impaired loans totaled $1.6 million and $2.6 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Additional information related to impaired loans is as follows for the years ended December 31:
             
(Dollars in thousands) 2006  2005  2004 
 
Average balance of impaired loans $11,972  $25,182  $45,645 
Interest income recognized on impaired loans (cost recovery)        102 
Loans outstanding to certain officers, directors, or companies in which they have 10% or more beneficial ownership, including officers and directors of the Company, as well as its subsidiaries (“Insiders”), approximated $1.1 million and $2.0 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. At December 31, 2006, there were no loans to insiders identified as potential problem loans. At December 31, 2005, there were no loans to insiders identified as potential problem loans, however there was an insider loan totaling $155,000 classified as nonaccruing and impaired. These loans were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rate and collateral, as comparable transactions with other customers.

69


An analysis of activity with respect to insider loans is as follows during the years ended December 31:
         
(Dollars in thousands) 2006  2005 
 
Insider loans at beginning of year $2,007  $27,165 
         
New loans to insiders  445   576 
Repayments received from insiders  (858)  (916)
Other changes (primarily changes in director and subsidiary director status)  (475)  (24,818)
       
         
Insider loans at end of year $1,119  $2,007 
       
For purposes of analyzing the activity in insider loans, credit renewals are not included as new loans to insiders.
             
  2009  2008  2007 
Allowance for loan losses, beginning of year $18,749  $15,521  $17,048 
Charge-offs  7,830   5,459   3,895 
Recoveries  2,120   2,136   2,252 
          
Net charge-offs  5,710   3,323   1,643 
Provision for loan losses  7,702   6,551   116 
          
Allowance for loan losses, end of year $20,741  $18,749  $15,521 
          
(6) Premises and Equipment(5.) PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT, NET
A summaryMajor classes of premises and equipment isat December 31, 2009 and 2008 are summarized as follows at December 31:(in thousands):
                
(Dollars in thousands) 2006 2005 
 2009 2008 
Land and land improvements $4,344 $4,344  $4,334 $4,334 
Buildings and leasehold improvements 34,287 34,017  39,553 39,298 
Furniture, fixtures, equipment and vehicles 22,368 21,695  23,771 24,480 
          
Premises and equipment 60,999 60,056  67,658 68,112 
 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization  (26,437)  (23,585)  (32,875)  (31,400)
     
      
Premises and equipment, net $34,562 $36,471  $34,783 $36,712 
          
Depreciation and amortization expense, included in occupancy and equipment expense in the consolidated statements of income,operations, amounted to $3.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 and $3.7 million $3.8 million and $3.4 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2006, 20052008 and 2004, respectively.2007.

- 79 -


FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(7) Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets(6.) GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The carrying amount of goodwill all of which was allocated to FSB, totaled $37.4 million atas of December 31, 20062009 and 2005. In accordance with SFAS No. 142,2008. The goodwill relates to the Company’s primary subsidiary and reporting unit, Five Star Bank. The Company performs a goodwill impairment test on an annual basis or more frequently if events and circumstances warrant.
The Company has historically considered total market capitalization as an indicator of fair value based on the trading price of its common stock compared to the carrying value of common equity. However, given the extreme volatility in the stock market during recent years and the impact that the credit crisis and the recession had on the stock market, management concluded that it was more appropriate to consider multiple approaches in assessing its goodwill for potential impairment.
At March 31, 2009, the Company has evaluatedconcluded that events had occurred and circumstances had changed which may indicate the existence of potential impairment of goodwill. These indicators included a significant decline in the Company’s stock price and deterioration in the banking industry. The Company utilized a valuation consultant to perform an interim assessment of its goodwill. The assessment included a weighted combination of valuation techniques, which incorporated both income and market based valuation approaches. The income based valuation approach, which carried the most weight, was based on a dividend discount analysis that calculated cash flows on projected financial results assuming a change of control transaction. The significant factors and assumptions used in the discounted dividend analysis included: management’s financial projections, projected dividend stream based on minimum capital requirements, change of control cost synergies, a multiple of terminal price-to-earnings and the discount rate used to calculate the present value of future cash flows. The valuation also included market based valuation approaches, which included application of median pricing multiples from recent actual acquisitions of companies of similar size, as well as, application of change of control premiums to trading value. The valuation resulted in a fair value that exceeded the carrying value of common equity by greater than 10% on a weighted basis. Based primarily on the results of this valuation, management concluded that no impairment of goodwill for impairment annually using a discounted cash flowexisted.
The Company continued to monitor the valuation analysis and determinedkey assumptions that drove the valuation throughout the remainder of 2009, including as of September 30, the annual evaluation date, considering updated assumptions as of September 30 and December 31, 2009, taking into consideration improvements in Company financial performance, as well as improved market and industry conditions in general, which occurred subsequent to the March 31, 2009 goodwill impairment analysis. Based on its ongoing evaluation and assessments, the Company concluded no impairment existed. There were no indicators of impairment aftergoodwill existed during and as of the annual test was performed.year ended December 31, 2009 as the valuation resulted in a fair value that exceeded the carrying value of common equity as of September 30 and December 31, 2009.
Declines in the market value of the Company’s publicly traded stock price or declines in the Company’s ability to generate future cash flows may increase the potential that goodwill recorded on the Company’s consolidated statement of financial condition be designated as impaired and that the Company may incur a goodwill write-down in the future.
Other intangible assets, included in other assets in the consolidated statements of financial condition, consist entirely of core deposit intangibles and are summarized as follows atas of December 31:31 (in thousands):
                
(Dollars in thousands) 2006 2005 
 2009 2008 
Other intangible assets $11,263 $11,452  $11,263 $11,263 
 
Accumulated amortization  (10,369)  (10,138)  (11,263)  (10,983)
     
      
Other intangible assets, net $894 $1,314  $ $280 
          

70


Intangible amortization expense for these other intangible assets amounted to $420,000, $430,000$280 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2009 and $709,000$307 thousand for each of the years ended December 31, 2006, 20052008 and 2004, respectively.2007. Amortization of other intangible assets was computed using the straight-line method over the estimated lives of the respective assets (primarily 5 and 7 years). Based on the current level

- 80 -


FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(7.) DEPOSITS
A summary of intangible assets, estimated future amortization expense for other intangible assets is as follows:
Year ending December 31:
     
(Dollars in thousands)    
2007 $307 
2008  307 
2009  280 
    
     
  $894 
    
(8) Deposits
Scheduled maturities for certificates of depositdeposits at December 31, 20062009 and 2008 are as follows:follows (dollars in thousands):
Mature in year ending December 31:
     
(Dollars in thousands)    
2007 $581,430 
2008  68,685 
2009  8,352 
2010  7,900 
2011  2,844 
Thereafter  477 
    
     
  $669,688 
    
         
  2009  2008 
Noninterest-bearing demand $324,303  $292,586 
Interest-bearing demand  363,698   344,616 
Savings and money market  368,603   348,594 
Certificates of deposit, due:        
Within one year  526,549   546,266 
One to two years  132,289   78,963 
Two to three years  8,200   7,625 
Three to five years  18,968   14,102 
Thereafter  345   511 
       
Total certificates of deposits  686,351   647,467 
       
Total deposits $1,742,955  $1,633,263 
       
Certificates of deposit greater thanin denominations of $100,000 totaled $195.4 million and $199.8 millionor more at December 31, 20062009, 2008 and 2005,2007 amounted to $173.4 million, $164.6 million and $154.5 million, respectively. Interest expense on those certificates of deposit greater than $100,000 amounted to $9.0totaled $3.2 million, $7.1$5.7 million and $6.0$9.5 million in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Interest expense by deposit type for the years ended December 31, 2006, 20052009, 2008 and 2004, respectively.2007 is summarized as follows (in thousands):
As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, overdrawn deposits included in loans on the consolidated statements of financial condition amounted to $864,000 and $905,000, respectively.
             
  2009  2008  2007 
Interest-bearing demand $772  $3,246  $5,760 
Savings and money market  1,090   3,773   5,863 
Certificates of deposit  17,228   22,330   31,091 
          
Total interest expense on deposits $19,090  $29,349  $42,714 
          
(9) Borrowings(8.) BORROWINGS
Outstanding borrowings are as follows at December 31:
         
(Dollars in thousands) 2006  2005 
 
Short-term borrowings:        
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements $32,310  $20,106 
       
Long-term borrowings:        
FHLB advances $38,187  $53,391 
Other     25,000 
       
         
Total long-term borrowings $38,187  $78,391 
       
Information related to federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements aresummarized as follows as of and for the years ended December 31:31 (in thousands):
             
(Dollars in thousands) 2006  2005  2004 
 
Weighted average interest rate at year-end  2.15%  1.46%  0.92%
Maximum outstanding at any month-end $32,353  $27,675  $30,524 
Average amount outstanding during the year $25,892  $24,550  $25,764 
         
  2009  2008 
Short-term borrowings:        
Federal funds purchased $9,419  $ 
Repurchase agreements  35,124   23,465 
Other short-term borrowings  15,000    
       
Total short-term borrowings  59,543   23,465 
       
         
Long-term borrowings:        
FHLB advances and repurchase agreements  30,145   30,653 
Junior subordinated debentures  16,702   16,702 
       
Total long-term borrowings  46,847   47,355 
       
Total borrowings $106,390  $70,820 
       
The average amounts outstanding are computed using daily average balances. Related interest expense for 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $559,000, $364,000 and $241,000, respectively.

71


At December 31, 2006, FHLB advances totaled $38.2 million and carried a weighted average interest rate of 5.12%. FHLBCompany classifies borrowings include both term and amortizing advances and are classified as short-term or long-term in accordance with the original terms.terms of the agreement. At December 31, 2006, all2009, the Company’s short-term and long-term borrowings had weighted average rates of 0.59% and 6.01%, respectively.
Short-term Borrowings
Federal funds purchased are short-term borrowings that typically mature within one to ninety days. Federal funds purchased totaled $9.4 million at December 31, 2009. There were no federal funds purchased outstanding at December 31, 2008. Repurchase agreements are secured overnight borrowings with customers. These short-term repurchase agreements amounted to $35.1 million and $23.5 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Other short-term borrowings at December 31, 2009 consisted of an advance from the Federal Reserve’s Term Auction Facility.

- 81 -


FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(8.) BORROWINGS (Continued)
Long-term Borrowings
The Company has credit capacity with the FHLB and can borrow through facilities that include an overnight line of credit, amortizing and term advances, were classifiedand repurchase agreements. The FHLB credit capacity is collateralized by securities from the Company’s investment portfolio and certain qualifying loans. FHLB advances totaled $145 thousand and $653 thousand as long-termof December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The advances mature on various dates through 2011.2011 and had a weighted average rate of 6.92% and 6.03% at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. FHLB advances include a $20.0 million fixed-rate callable advance, which canrepurchase agreements are stated at the amount of cash received in connection with the transaction. The Company may be called byrequired to provide additional collateral based on the FHLB on a quarterly basis. FHLB advances are collateralized by $3.6 million of FHLB stock and investment securities with a fair value of approximately $71.2the underlying securities. FHLB repurchase agreements totaled $30.0 million at both December 31, 2009 and 2008. The FHLB repurchase agreements mature on various dates through 2011 and bear fixed interest rates ranging from 3.48% to 3.98% with a weighted average rate of 3.67% at December 31, 2006. At December 31, 2006, the Bank had remaining credit available of approximately $31.5 million under lines of credit with the FHLB. The Bank also had $102.1 million of remaining credit available under unsecured lines of credit with various other banks2009.
Scheduled minimum future principal payments on FHLB advances and repurchase agreements at December 31, 2006.2009 were as follows (in thousands):
The Company also had a credit agreement with another commercial bank and pledged the stock of FSB as collateral for the credit facility. The credit agreement included a $25.0 million term loan facility and a $5.0 million revolving loan facility. At June 30, 2005, the Company was in default of an affirmative financial covenant in the credit agreement and reclassified the borrowing from long-term to short-term. The bank waived the event of default at June 30, 2005. As of September 30, 2005, FII and the bank agreed to modify the covenants in the agreement. FII complied with the modified covenants, therefore the term loan was classified as a long-term borrowing at December 31, 2005. In addition, the interest rate and maturity of the term loan facility were modified. The amended and restated term loan required monthly payments of interest only at a variable interest rate of London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 2.00% through the third quarter of 2006. During October 2006, FII repaid the $25.0 million term loan. The debt was scheduled for repayment in equal annual installments of $6.25 million beginning in December 2007. The $5.0 million revolving loan was also modified to accrue interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 1.75% and is scheduled to mature April of 2007. There were no advances outstanding on the revolving loan during the year ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.
At December 31, 2006, the aggregate maturities of long-term borrowings, including maturities of amortizing advances, are as follows:
Mature in year ending December 31:
     
(Dollars in thousands)    
2007 $12,321 
2008  5,212 
2009  20,508 
2010  80 
2011  66 
    
     
  $38,187 
    
(10) Junior Subordinated Debentures
     
2010 $20,080 
2011  10,065 
    
  $30,145 
    
In February 2001, the Company established FISIformed Financial Institutions Statutory Trust I (the “Trust”), which is a statutory business trust formed under Connecticut law. The Trust exists for the exclusive purposessole purpose of (i) issuing and selling 30 year guaranteedtrust preferred beneficial interestssecurities. The Company’s $502 thousand investment in the trust assets (“trust preferred” or “capital” securities)common equity of the Trust is classified in the aggregate amountconsolidated statements of $16.2financial condition as other assets and $16.7 million atof related debentures are classified as long-term borrowings. In 2001, the Company incurred costs relating to the issuance of the debentures totaling $487 thousand. These costs, which are included in other assets on the consolidated statements of financial condition, were deferred and are being amortized to interest expense using the straight-line method over a twenty year period.
The Company, through the Trust, issued 16,200 fixed rate pooled trust preferred securities with a liquidation preference of 10.20%, (ii) using$1,000 per security. The trust preferred securities represent an interest in the proceeds from the salerelated subordinated debentures of the capital securities to acquire the junior subordinated debentures issuedCompany, which were purchased by the CompanyTrust and (iii) engaging in only those other activities necessary, advisable or incidental thereto.
have substantially the same payment terms as these trust preferred securities. The Company’s junior subordinated debentures are the primaryonly assets of the Trust and accordingly,interest payments underfrom the corporation obligated junior debentures arefinance the sole revenue ofdistributions paid on the Trust. The capital securities of the Trust are non-voting. The Company owns all of the common securities of the Trust. The capital securities qualified as Tier 1 capital under regulatory definitions as of December 31, 2006 and 2005.
The Company’s primary sources of funds to pay interesttrust preferred securities. Distributions on the debentures held byare payable semi-annually at a fixed interest rate of 10.20%. The trust preferred securities are subject to mandatory redemption at the Trust are current dividends from FSB. Accordingly,liquidation preference, in whole or in part, upon repayment of the Company’s ability to service thesubordinated debentures is dependent upon the ability of FSB to pay dividends to the Company. Since the juniorat maturity or their earlier redemption. The subordinated debentures are classified as debt for financial statement purposes,redeemable prior to the associated tax-deductible expense has been recorded as interest expensematurity date of February 1, 2031, at the option of the Company on or after February 1, 2011, in whole at any time thereafter or in part from time to time thereafter. The subordinated debentures are also redeemable at any time, in whole, but not in part, upon the consolidated statementsoccurrence of income.

72


specific events defined within the trust indenture. The Company incurred $487,000 in costshas the option to issuedefer distributions on the securities and the costs are being amortized oversubordinated debentures from time to time for a period not to exceed 20 years using the interest method.
As of December 31, 2003,consecutive quarters, however the Company deconsolidated the subsidiary Trust, which had issued trust preferred securities, and replaced the presentation of such instruments with the Company’s junior subordinated debentures issuedhas not opted to the subsidiary Trust. Such presentation reflects the adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46 R”), “Consolidation of Variable defer any payments to date.
Interest Entities.”
(11) Income Taxes
Total income tax expense (benefit) is allocated as followson borrowings for the years ended December 31:
             
(Dollars in thousands) 2006  2005  2004 
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations $6,245  $(1,766) $3,170 
Loss on discontinued operations     1,041   (149)
Additional paid-in capital for stock options exercised  (8)  (129)  (204)
Shareholders’ equity for unrealized loss on securities available for sale  (241)  (6,675)  (2,864)
Shareholders’ equity for unrecognized net periodic defined benefit pension costs  (1,157)      
Shareholders’ equity for unrecognized net periodic postretirement benefit costs  134       
          
 
  $4,973  $(7,529) $(47)
          
Income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 is summarized as follows for the years ended December 31:(in thousands):
             
(Dollars in thousands) 2006  2005  2004 
 
Current:            
Federal $6,152  $(9,254) $6,161 
State  30   (214)  1,486 
          
Total current tax expense (benefit)  6,182   (9,468)  7,647 
Deferred:            
Federal  (1,498)  7,493   (3,630)
State  1,561   209   (847)
          
Total deferred tax expense (benefit)  63   7,702   (4,477)
          
             
Total income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations $6,245  $(1,766) $3,170 
          
The following is a reconciliation of the actual and statutory tax rates for income from continuing operations for the years ended December 31:
             
  2006  2005  2004 
   
Statutory rate  34.0%  35.0%  35.0%
Increase (decrease) resulting from:            
Tax exempt interest income  (12.8)  (106.9)  (18.4)
Disallowed interest expense  1.5   10.1   1.4 
State taxes, net of federal income tax benefit  4.4   (0.1)  2.5 
Other  (0.6)     (0.8)
          
             
Total  26.5%  (61.9)%  19.7%
          
             
  2009  2008  2007 
Short-term borrowings $270  $721  $864 
Long-term borrowings  2,857   3,547   3,561 
          
Total interest expense on borrowings $3,127  $4,268  $4,425 
          

73


The following table presents the tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at December 31:
         
(Dollars in thousands) 2006  2005 
 
Deferred tax assets:        
Allowance for loan losses $6,054  $7,441 
Unrealized loss on securities available for sale  4,338   4,097 
Core deposit intangible  675   821 
Interest on nonaccruing loans  996   1,011 
Tax attribute carryforward benefits  2,575   1,374 
Accrued employee benefits  247   412 
Stock compensation  268    
Other  223   148 
       
 
Total gross deferred tax assets  15,376   15,304 
 
Deferred tax liabilities:        
Prepaid pension and postretirement plan costs  45   1,135 
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment  1,330   1,617 
Net deferred loan origination costs  1,752   1,310 
Loan servicing assets  453   620 
Other  19   46 
       
 
Total gross deferred tax liabilities  3,599   4,728 
       
 
Net deferred tax assets (included in other assets) at end of year  11,777   10,576 
 
Net deferred tax assets (included in other assets) at beginning of year  10,576   11,603 
       
 
(Increase) decrease in net deferred tax assets  (1,201)  1,027 
 
Change in unrealized loss on securities available for sale  241   6,675 
 
Unrecognized net periodic pension costs  1,157    
 
Unrecognized net periodic postretirement costs  (134)   
       
 
Deferred tax expense $63  $7,702 
       
Realization of the net deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income or the existence of sufficient taxable income within the carry-back period. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, management considers the scheduled reversal of the deferred tax liabilities, the level of historical taxable income and projected future taxable income over the periods in which the temporary differences comprising the deferred tax assets will be deductible. Based on its assessment, management determined that no valuation allowance is necessary at December 31, 2006 and 2005.
The Company has the following tax attribute carryforward benefits available at December 31:
       
      Year(s) of
(Dollars in thousands) 2006  Expiration
       
Federal:      
Net operating loss $208  2021
Tax credits  2,153  None
       
New York State:      
Net operating loss $5,401  2021-2025
Charitable contribution  267  2010
Tax credits  107  None
The federal net operating loss carryforward and $208,000 of the New York State net operating loss carryforward are subject to annual limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”). The Company believes the limitations will not prevent the carryforward benefits from being utilized.

74- 82 -


(12) CommitmentsFINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and Contingencies2007
Commitments(9.) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
InFinancial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk
The Company has financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk established in the normal course of business there are various outstandingto meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit that are not reflectedand standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk extending beyond amounts recognized in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Loan commitments have off-balance-sheet
The Company’s exposure to credit risk until commitments are fulfilled or expire. The credit risk amounts are equalloss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the contractual amounts, assumingfinancial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved with extending loans to customers. The Company uses the amounts are ultimately advancedsame credit underwriting policies in fullmaking commitments and that the collateral or other security is of no value. The Company’s policy generally requires customers to provide collateral, usually in the form of customers’ operating assets or property, prior to the disbursement of approved loans. conditional obligations as for on-balance sheet instruments.
At December 31, 2006, stand-by letters of credit totaling $5.8 million2009 and unused loan2008, the off-balance sheet commitments and lines of credit of $258.6 million were contractually available. Approximately 18%consist of the unused loan commitments and lines offollowing (in thousands):
         
  2009  2008 
Commitments to extend credit $316,688  $339,454 
Standby letters of credit  6,887   7,902 
Commitments to extend credit were at fixed rates at December 31, 2006. There were no significant commitmentsare agreements to lend to nonperforming borrowers at December 31, 2006. Comparable amounts fora customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the stand-by letters of credit and commitments at December 31, 2005 were $9.5 million and $231.5 million, respectively.contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected toCommitments may expire without funding,being drawn upon; therefore the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Each customer’s creditworthiness is evaluated on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if any, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the borrower. Standby letters of credit are conditional lending commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. These standby letters of credit are primarily issued to support private borrowing arrangements. The credit risk involved in issuing standby letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.
The Company also extends rate lock agreements to borrowers related to the origination of residential mortgage loans. To mitigate the interest rate risk inherent in these rate lock agreements when the Company intends to sell the related loan, once originated, as well as closed residential mortgage loans held for sale, the Company enters into forward commitments to sell individual mortgage loans.residential mortgages. Rate lock agreements and forward commitments are considered derivatives and are recorded at fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 133. Atvalue. As of December 31, 20062009 and 2005,2008, the total notional amount of these derivatives (rate lock agreements and forward commitments) held by the Company amounted to $4.5$9.4 million and $8.2$21.3 million, respectively. The fair value of these derivatives in a gain position were recorded as other assets, while the fair value of these derivatives in a loss position were recorded as other liabilities in the consolidated statements of financial condition. In addition, the net change in the fair values of these derivatives was recognized in current earnings as other noninterest income or other noninterest expense in the consolidated statements of income.operations. These fair values and changes in fair values were not significant atas of or for the years ended December 31, 20062009 and 2005.2008.
Lease Obligations
The Company wasis obligated under a number of noncancellable operating leaseslease agreements for land, buildings and equipment. Certain of these leases provide for escalation clauses and contain renewal options calling for increased rentals if the lease is renewed. The futureFuture minimum lease payments on operatingby year and in the aggregate, under the noncancellable leases with initial or remaining terms of one year or more, are as follows at December 31, 2006:2009 (in thousands):
Operating lease payments in year ending December 31:
     
(Dollars in thousands)    
2007 $769 
2008  682 
2009  628 
2010  420 
2011  411 
Thereafter  1,779 
    
     
  $4,689 
    
     
2010 $1,135 
2011  1,065 
2012  1,033 
2013  894 
2014  863 
Thereafter  4,386 
    
  $9,376 
    
Rent expense relating to these operating leases, included in occupancy and equipment expense in the consolidated statements of income, totaled $761,000, $645,000operations, was $1.5 million, $1.1 million and $646,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005$970 thousand in 2009, 2008 and 2004,2007, respectively.
Contingent Liabilities
In the ordinary course of business there are various threatened and pending legal proceedings against the Company. Based on consultation with outside legal counsel, management believes that the aggregate liability, if any, arising from such litigation would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

75

- 83 -


(13) RetirementFINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and Postretirement Benefit Plans2007
Adoption of SFAS No. 158(10.) REGULATORY MATTERS
General
The supervision and regulation of financial and bank holding companies and their subsidiaries is intended primarily for the protection of depositors, the deposit insurance funds regulated by the FDIC and the banking system as a whole, and not for the protection of shareholders or creditors of bank holding companies. The various bank regulatory agencies have broad enforcement power over financial holding companies and banks, including the power to impose substantial fines, operational restrictions and other penalties for violations of laws and regulations and for safety and soundness considerations.
Capital
Banks and financial holding companies are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by state and federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Capital adequacy guidelines and, additionally for banks, prompt corrective action regulations, involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators about components, risk weighting and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company adopted SFAS No. 158 effective December 31, 2006,and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of Total and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and of Tier 1 capital to average assets (all as defined in the regulations). These minimum amounts and ratios are included in the table below.
The Company’s and the Bank’s Tier 1 capital consists of shareholders’ equity excluding unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale (except for unrealized losses which required the over-funded or under-funded status of its defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit planshave been determined to be other than temporary and recognized as an asset or liabilityexpense in the consolidated statements of financial condition. Futureoperations), goodwill and other intangible assets and disallowed portions of deferred tax assets. Tier 1 capital for the Company also includes, subject to limitation, $16.7 million of trust preferred securities issued by FISI Statutory Trust I and $37.5 million of preferred stock issued to the U.S. Department of Treasury (the “Treasury”) through the Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”) (see Note 11, Shareholders’ Equity). The Company and the Bank’s total capital are comprised of Tier 1 capital for each entity plus a permissible portion of the allowance for loan losses.

- 84 -


FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(10.) REGULATORY MATTERS (Continued)
The Tier 1 and total capital ratios are calculated by dividing the respective capital amounts by risk-weighted assets. Risk-weighted assets are calculated based on regulatory requirements and include total assets, excluding goodwill and other intangible assets and disallowed portions of deferred tax assets, allocated by risk weight category and certain off-balance sheet items (primarily loan commitments and securities more than one level below investment grade that are subject to the low level exposure rule). The leverage ratio is calculated by dividing Tier 1 capital by adjusted quarterly average total assets, which exclude goodwill and other intangible assets and disallowed portions of deferred tax assets.
The Company’s and the Bank’s actual and required capital ratios as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 were as follows (dollars in thousands):
                         
          For Capital    
  Actual  Adequacy Purposes  Well Capitalized 
  Amount  Ratio  Amount  Ratio  Amount  Ratio 
December 31, 2009:
                        
Tier 1 leverage:                        
Company $163,613   7.96% $82,188   4.00% $102,735   5.00%
Bank (FSB)  154,316   7.53   82,018   4.00   102,522   5.00 
                         
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets):                        
Company  163,613   11.95   54,746   4.00   82,119   6.00 
Bank (FSB)  154,316   11.33   54,475   4.00   81,712   6.00 
                         
Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets):                        
Company  180,766   13.21   109,492   8.00   136,865   10.00 
Bank (FSB)  171,385   12.58   108,949   8.00   136,186   10.00 
                         
December 31, 2008:
                        
Tier 1 leverage:                        
Company $150,426   8.05% $74,764   4.00% $93,456   5.00%
Bank (FSB)  120,484   6.46   74,586   4.00   93,232   5.00 
                         
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets):                        
Company  150,426   11.83   50,881   4.00   76,322   6.00 
Bank (FSB)  120,484   9.52   50,624   4.00   75,936   6.00 
                         
Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets):                        
Company  166,362   13.08   101,762   8.00   127,203   10.00 
Bank (FSB)  136,340   10.77   101,248   8.00   126,560   10.00 
Five Star Bank has been notified by its regulator that, as of its most recent regulatory examination, it is regarded as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. Such determination has been made based on the Bank’s Tier 1, total capital, and leverage ratios. There have been no conditions or events since this notification that management believes would change the Bank’s categorization as well capitalized under the aforementioned ratios.
Federal Reserve Requirements
The Bank is required to maintain a reserve balance at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The reserve requirement for the Bank totaled $1.0 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008.
Dividend Restrictions
In the ordinary course of business, the Company is dependent upon dividends from Five Star Bank to provide funds for the payment of interest expense on the junior subordinated debentures, dividends to shareholders and to provide for other cash requirements. Banking regulations may limit the amount of dividends that may be paid. Approval by regulatory authorities is required if the effect of dividends declared would cause the regulatory capital of the Bank to fall below specified minimum levels. Approval is also required if dividends declared exceed the net profits for that year combined with the retained net profits for the preceding two years. The Bank is currently required to obtain approval from the NYS Banking Department for dividends payments.
In addition, pursuant to the terms of the Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program (see Note 11, Shareholders’ Equity), the Company may not declare or pay any cash dividends on its common stock other than regular quarterly cash dividends of not more than $0.10 without the consent of the U.S. Treasury.

- 85 -


FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(11.) SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
The Company’s authorized capital stock consists of 50,210,000 shares of capital stock, 50,000,000 of which are common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and 210,000 of which are preferred stock, par value $100.00 per share, which is designated into two classes, Class A of which 10,000 shares are authorized, and Class B of which 200,000 shares are authorized. There are two series of Class A Preferred Stock; Series A 3% Preferred Stock and the Series A Preferred Stock. There is one series of Class B Preferred Stock; Series B-1 8.48% Preferred Stock. As of December 31, 2009, there were 183,259 shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding.
Common Stock
The changes in shares of common stock outstanding were as follows for the funded statusyears ended December 31:
         
  2009  2008 
Shares outstanding at beginning of period  10,798,019   11,011,151 
Restricted stock awards issued  13,172   51,500 
Stock options exercised  1,010   2,317 
Directors’ retainer  8,067   5,912 
Treasury stock purchases     (272,861)
       
  
Shares outstanding at end of period  10,820,268   10,798,019 
       
Treasury Stock
There were no repurchases of the defined benefitCompany’s stock during 2009. The Company repurchased 272,861 shares of its common stock in open market transactions at an aggregate cost of $4.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2008.
Preferred Stock and postretirement plansWarrant
Series A 3% Preferred Stock.As of December 31, 2009, there were 1,533 shares of Series A 3% Preferred Stock issued and outstanding. Holders of Series A 3% Preferred Stock are entitled to receive an annual dividend of $3.00 per share, which is cumulative and payable quarterly. Holders of Series A 3% Preferred Stock have no pre-emptive right in, or right to purchase or subscribe for, any additional shares of the Company’s capital stock and have no voting rights. Dividend or dissolution payments to the Class A shareholders must be declared and paid, or set apart for payment, before any dividends or dissolution payments can be declared and paid, or set apart for payment, to the holders of Class B Preferred Stock or Common Stock. The Series A 3% Preferred Stock is not convertible into any other of the Company’s securities.
Series A Preferred Stock and Warrant.In December 2008, under the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s (“Treasury”) TARP Capital Purchase Program, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement—Standard Terms with the U.S. Treasury pursuant to which, among other things, the Company sold to the U.S. Treasury for an aggregate purchase price of $37.5 million, 7,503 shares of fixed rate cumulative perpetual preferred stock, Series A (Series A Preferred Stock) and a warrant to purchase up to 378,175 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Warrant”), of the Company. The Company’s Series A Preferred Stock qualifies as Tier 1 capital in accordance with regulatory capital requirements (see Note 10, Regulatory Matters).
The Series A Preferred Stock ranks senior to the Company’s common shares andpari passu, which is at an equal level in the capital structure, with existing preferred shares (Series A 3% Preferred Stock), other than preferred shares which by their terms rank junior to any other existing preferred shares (Series B-1 8.48% Preferred Stock). The Series A Preferred Stock pays a compounding cumulative dividend, in cash, at a rate of 5% per annum through February 15, 2014, and 9% per annum thereafter on the liquidation preference of $5,000 per share. The Company is prohibited from paying any dividend with respect to shares of common stock, other junior securities or preferred stock rankingpari passuwith the Series A Preferred Stock or repurchasing or redeeming any shares of the Company’s common shares, other junior securities or preferred stock rankingpari passuwith the Series A Preferred Stock in any quarter unless all accrued and unpaid dividends are paid on the Series A Preferred Stock for all past dividend periods (including the latest completed dividend period), subject to certain limited exceptions. The Series A Preferred Stock is non-voting, other than class voting rights on matters that could adversely affect the Series A Preferred Stock. The U.S. Treasury may also transfer the Series A Preferred Stock to a third party at any time.

- 86 -


FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(11.) SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Continued)
The Warrant has a term of 10 years and is exercisable at any time, in whole or in part, at an exercise price of $14.88 per share (subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments). The U.S. Treasury may not exercise the Warrant for, or transfer the Warrant with respect to, more than half of the initial shares of common stock underlying the Warrant prior to the earlier of (i) the date on which the Company receives aggregate gross proceeds of not less than $37.5 million from one or more qualified equity offerings and (ii) December 31, 2009. The number of shares to be delivered upon settlement of the Warrant would have been reduced by 50% if the Company receives aggregate gross proceeds of at least 100% of the aggregate liquidation preference of the Series A Preferred Stock ($37.5 million) from one or more qualified equity offerings prior to December 31, 2009.
Under the original terms of the CPP, the Company could not redeem the Series A Preferred Stock prior to February 15, 2012 except with proceeds from a qualified offering. However, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“ARRA”), provides that the Secretary of Treasury shall permit a recipient of funds under TARP, subject to consultation with the recipient’s appropriate Federal banking agency, to repay such assistance without regard to whether the recipient has replaced such funds from any other source or to any waiting period. ARRA further provides that when the recipient repays such assistance, the Secretary of Treasury shall liquidate the warrants associated with the assistance at the current market price. The Company will be recognizedsubject to existing supervisory procedures for approving redemption requests for capital instruments if it elects to repay the TARP funds. The FRB will weigh the Company’s desire to redeem the Series A Preferred Stock against the contribution of Treasury capital to the Company’s overall soundness, capital adequacy and ability to lend.
The $37.5 million in proceeds was allocated to the Series A Preferred Stock and the Warrant based on their relative fair values at issuance ($35.5 million was allocated to the Series A Preferred Stock and $2.0 million to the Warrant). The difference between the initial value allocated to the Series A Preferred Stock of $35.5 million and the liquidation value of $37.5 million is being charged to retained earnings as an adjustment to the dividend yield using the effective yield method. The amount charged to retained earnings is deducted from the numerator in calculating basic and diluted earnings per share during the related reporting period (see Note 15, Earnings (Loss) per Share).
The Company is currently evaluating repayment options relative to the TARP funds to determine the most economically beneficial option for both the Company and shareholders.
Series B-1 8.48% Preferred Stock.As of December 31, 2009, there were 174,223 shares of Series B-1 8.48% Preferred Stock issued and outstanding. Holders of Series B-1 8.48% Preferred Stock are entitled to receive an annual dividend of $8.48 per share, which is cumulative and payable quarterly. Holders of Series B-1 8.48% Preferred Stock have no pre-emptive right in, or right to purchase or subscribe for, any additional shares of the Company’s capital stock and have no voting rights. Accumulated dividends on the Series B-1 8.48% Preferred Stock do not bear interest, and the Series B-1 8.48% Preferred Stock is not subject to redemption. Dividend or dissolution payments to the Class B shareholders must be declared and paid, or set apart for payment, before any dividends or dissolution payments are declared and paid, or set apart for payment, to the holders of Common Stock. The Series B-1 8.48% Preferred Stock is not convertible into any other of the Company’s securities.

- 87 -


FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(12.) COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Total comprehensive income (loss) is reported in the yearaccompanying consolidated statements of changes in whichshareholders’ equity. Information related to comprehensive income (loss) for the changes occur throughyears ended December 31 was as follows (in thousands):
             
  Pre-tax
Amount
  Tax Expense
(Benefit)
  Net-of-tax
Amount
 
2009
            
Securities available for sale:            
Change in net unrealized gain/loss during the period $(4,186) $(1,619) $(2,567)
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in income  (3,429)  (1,327)  (2,102)
Reclassification adjustment for impairment charges included in income  4,666   1,805   2,861 
          
   (2,949)  (1,141)  (1,808)
Change in net actuarial gain/loss and prior service benefit (cost) on defined benefit pension and post-retirement plans  3,457   1,338   2,119 
          
Other comprehensive income $508  $197   311 
           
Net income          14,441 
            
Comprehensive income         $14,752 
            
             
2008
            
Securities available for sale:            
Change in net unrealized gain/loss during the period $(61,464) $(23,778) $(37,686)
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in income  (288)  (111)  (177)
Reclassification adjustment for impairment charges included in income  68,215   26,389   41,826 
          
   6,463   2,500   3,963 
Change in net actuarial gain/loss and prior service benefit (cost) on defined benefit pension and post-retirement plans  (14,098)  (5,455)  (8,643)
          
Other comprehensive loss $(7,635) $(2,955)  (4,680)
           
Net loss          (26,158)
            
Comprehensive loss         $(30,838)
            
             
2007
            
Securities available for sale:            
Change in net unrealized gain/loss during the period $10,530  $4,103  $6,427 
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in income  (207)  (80)  (127)
          
   10,323   4,023   6,300 
Change in net actuarial gain/loss and prior service benefit (cost) on defined benefit pension and post-retirement plans  4,531   1,760   2,771 
          
Other comprehensive income $14,854  $5,783   9,071 
           
Net income          16,409 
            
Comprehensive income         $25,480 
            
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss.(loss), net of tax, as of December 31 were as follows (in thousands):
         
  2009  2008 
Net actuarial loss and prior service cost on defined benefit pension and post-retirement plans $(5,357) $(7,476)
Net unrealized gain on securities available for sale  1,655   3,463 
       
  $(3,702) $(4,013)
       

- 88 -


FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(13.) SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
The incremental effectCompany maintains certain stock-based compensation plans, approved by the Company’s shareholders that are administered by the Board, or the Management Development and Compensation Committee of applying SFAS No. 158the Board. On May 6, 2009 the shareholders of the Company approved two share-based compensation plans, the 2009 Management Stock Incentive Plan (“Management Plan”) and the 2009 Directors’ Stock Incentive Plan (“Director’s Plan”). An aggregate of 690,000 shares has been reserved for issuance by the Company under the terms of the Management Plan pursuant to the grant of incentive stock options (not to exceed 500,000 shares), non-qualified stock options and restricted stock grants all which are defined in the plan. An aggregate of 250,000 shares has been reserved for issuance by the Company under the terms of the Director’s Plan pursuant to the grant of non-qualified stock options and restricted stock grants, all which are defined in the plan. Under both plans, for purposes of calculating the number of shares of common stock available for issuance, each share of common stock granted pursuant to a restricted stock grant shall count as 1.64 shares of common stock. As of December 31, 2009, there were approximately 237,000 and 687,000 shares available for grant under the Director’s Plan and Management Plan, respectively, of which 61% were available for issuance as restricted stock grants.
Under the Management Plan and the Director’s Plan (the “Plans”), the Board (or the Compensation Committee) may establish and prescribe grant guidelines including various terms and conditions for the granting of stock-based compensation. For stock options, the exercise price of each option equals the market price of the Company’s stock on individual line itemsthe date of the grant. All options expire after a period of ten years from the date of grant and generally become fully exercisable over a period of 3 to 5 years from the grant date. When option recipients exercise their options, the Company issues shares from treasury stock and records the proceeds as additions to capital. For restricted stock, shares generally vests over 2 to 3 years from the grant date. Vesting of the shares may be based on years of service, established performance measures or both. If restricted stock grants are forfeited before they vest, the shares are reacquired into treasury stock.
The share-based compensation plans were established to allow for the granting of compensation awards to attract, motivate and retain employees, executive officers and non-employee directors who contribute to the success and profitability of the Company and to give such persons a proprietary interest in the Company, thereby enhancing their personal interest in the Company’s success.
The share-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was as follows (in thousands):
             
  2009  2008  2007 
Stock options:            
Management Stock Incentive Plan $222  $378  $571 
Director Stock Incentive Plan  46   40   220 
          
Total stock option expense  268   418   791 
Restricted stock awards:            
Management Stock Incentive Plan  488   215   164 
Director Stock Incentive Plan  98       
          
Total restricted stock award expense  586   215   164 
          
  
Total share-based compensation $854  $633  $955 
          
The restricted stock award expense for 2009 and 2008 included $2 thousand and $30 thousand, respectively, of dividends for unearned shares in the restricted stock plan which is accounted for as compensation expense.
The following is a summary of stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 2009 (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):
                 
          Weighted    
      Weighted  Average    
      Average  Remaining  Aggregate 
  Number of  Exercise  Contractual  Intrinsic 
  Options  Price  Term  Value 
Outstanding at beginning of year  582,885  $19.14         
Granted              
Exercised  (1,010)  14.00         
Forfeited  (8,500)  18.48         
Expired  (114,641)  14.61         
                
Outstanding at end of year  458,734   20.30  5.25 years $ 
Exercisable at end of year  369,004   20.76  4.64 years $ 

- 89 -


FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(13.) SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued)
As of December 31, 2009, there was $196 thousand of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock options that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.59 years.
The aggregate intrinsic value (the amount by which the market price of the stock on the date of exercise exceeded the market price of the stock on the date of grant) of option exercises for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $1 thousand, $10 thousand, and $52 thousand, respectively. The total cash received as a result of option exercises under stock compensation plans for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $14 thousand, $32 thousand, and $251 thousand, respectively. The tax benefits realized in connection with these stock option exercises were not significant.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes valuation method to estimate the fair value of its stock option awards. This method is dependent on certain assumption. There were no stock options awarded during 2009. The following is a summary of the stock options granted as well as the weighted average assumptions used to compute the fair value of the options for the periods ended December 31, 2008 and 2007:
         
  2008  2007 
Options granted  61,100   90,700 
Grant date weighted average fair value per share $5.09  $7.09 
Grant date weighted average share price $16.98  $19.49 
Risk-free interest rate  3.40%  4.76%
Expected dividend yield  3.48%  2.21%
Expected stock price volatility  38.60%  39.36%
Expected life (in years)  6.19   5.94 
In the table above the risk-free interest rate is the U.S. Treasury rate commensurate with the expected life of option on the date of their grant. The expected stock price volatility is based upon historical activity of the Company’s stock over a span of time equal to the expected life of the options. The expected life for options granted is based upon based on historical experience for the Plans.
The following is a summary of restricted stock award activity for the year ended December 31, 2009:
         
      Weighted 
      Average 
      Market 
  Number of  Price at 
  Shares  Grant Date 
Outstanding at beginning of year  81,800  $19.35 
Granted  58,472   13.33 
Vested  (17,200)  18.61 
Forfeited  (45,300)  19.23 
        
Outstanding at end of year  77,772  $15.05 
        
As of December 31, 2009, there was $399 thousand of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested restricted stock awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.36 years.

- 90 -


FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(14.) INCOME TAXES
Total income tax expense (benefit) was allocated as follows for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
             
  2009  2008  2007 
Income tax expense (benefit) $6,140  $(21,301) $4,800 
Shareholder’s equity  197   (2,955)  5,783 
The income tax provision (benefit) for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 consisted of the following (in thousands):
             
  2009  2008  2007 
Current tax (benefit) expense:            
Federal $(1,355) $2,043  $3,572 
State  25   504   513 
          
Total current tax (benefit) expense  (1,330)  2,547   4,085 
          
Deferred tax expense (benefit):            
Federal  6,189   (19,640)  126 
State  1,281   (4,208)  589 
          
Total deferred tax expense (benefit)  7,470   (23,848)  715 
          
Total income tax expense (benefit): $6,140  $(21,301) $4,800 
          
Income tax expense (benefit) differed from the statutory federal income tax rate as follows:
             
  2009  2008  2007 
Statutory federal tax rate  34.0%  (34.0)%  34.0%
Increase (decrease) resulting from:            
Tax exempt interest income  (8.6)  (5.2)  (13.6)
Non-taxable earnings on company owned life insurance  (1.8)  (0.4)  (2.0)
Dividend received deduction  (0.1)  (0.8)  (1.5)
State taxes, net of federal tax benefit  4.2   (5.2)  3.4 
Nondeductible expenses  1.0   0.2   0.4 
Disallowed interest expense  0.5   0.5   1.8 
Other, net  0.6      0.1 
          
Effective tax rate  29.8%  (44.9)%  22.6%
          

- 91 -


FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(14.)
INCOME TAXES (Continued)
The Company’s net deferred tax asset is included in other assets in the Consolidated Statements of Condition. The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows (in thousands):
         
  2009  2008 
Deferred tax assets:        
Other than temporary impairment of investment securities $14,827  $26,389 
Allowance for loan losses  7,418   6,619 
Tax attribute carryforward benefits  5,559   2,689 
Share-based compensation  1,033   794 
Interest on non-accruing loans  788   595 
Core deposit intangible  258   332 
Accrued pension costs  92   2,494 
Other  580   374 
       
Gross deferred tax assets  30,555   40,286 
         
Deferred tax liabilities:        
Deferred loan origination costs  3,290   4,458 
Net unrealized gain on securities available for sale  1,044   2,185 
Depreciation and amortization  1,283   1,342 
Loan servicing assets  522   218 
Other  1   2 
       
Gross deferred tax liabilities  6,140   8,205 
       
Net deferred tax asset $24,415  $32,081 
       
The Company recognizes deferred income taxes for the estimated future tax effects of differences between the tax and financial statement bases of assets and liabilities considering enacted tax laws. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in other assets in the Company’s consolidated statements of financial conditioncondition. The Company also assesses the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be realizable based on, among other considerations, future taxable income and establishes, if necessary, a valuation allowance for those deferred tax assets determined to not likely be realizable. A deferred tax asset valuation allowance is as followsrecognized if, based on the weight of available evidence (both positive and negative), it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The future realization of deferred tax benefits depends upon the existence of sufficient taxable income within the carry-back and carry-forward periods. Management judgment is required in determining the appropriate recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities, including projections of future taxable income.
Based upon the Company’s historical and projected future levels of pre-tax and taxable income, the scheduled reversals of taxable temporary differences to offset future deductible amounts, and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies, management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized. As such, no valuation allowance has been recorded as of December 31:31, 2009 or 2008.
             
  2006
  Before     After
(Dollars in thousands) Adoption Adjustment Adoption
 
Prepaid pension asset, included in other assets $3,086  $(2,971) $115 
Net deferred tax assets, include in other assets  10,754   1,023   11,777 
Accrued postretirement liability, included in other liabilities  791   (344)  447 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)  (6,800)  (1,604)  (8,404)
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to federal and New York State (“NYS”) income taxes. The federal income tax years currently open for audit are 2007 through 2009. The NYS income tax years currently open for audit are 2006 through 2009.
At December 31, 2009, the Company has federal and NYS net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $58 thousand and $7.9 million, respectively. The federal and NYS net operating loss carryforwards begin to expire in 2021. The Company also has federal and NYS tax credits of approximately $5.2 million and $53 thousand, respectively, which have an unlimited carryforward period. The federal and NYS net operating loss carryforwards are subject to annual limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”). The Company believes the limitations will not prevent the carryforward benefits from being utilized.
The Company’s unrecognized tax benefits and changes in unrecognized tax benefits were not significant as of or for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. There were no interest or penalties recorded in the income statement in income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2009. As of December 31, 2009, there were no amounts accrued for interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions.

- 92 -


FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(15.) EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
The following table presents a reconciliation of the earnings and shares used in calculating basic and diluted EPS for each of the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands, except per share amounts).
             
  2009  2008  2007 
Net income (loss) allocated to common shareholders $10,744  $(27,696) $14,926 
Less: Earnings (loss) allocated to participating securities  87   (230)   
          
Earnings (loss) allocated to common shares outstanding $10,657  $(27,466) $14,926 
          
             
Weighted average common shares used to calculate basic EPS  10,730   10,818   11,154 
Add: Effect of common stock equivalents  39      30 
          
Weighted average common shares used to calculate diluted EPS  10,769   10,818   11,184 
          
             
Earnings (loss) per common share:            
Basic $0.99  $(2.54) $1.34 
Diluted $0.99  $(2.54) $1.33 
             
Shares subject to the following securities, outstanding as of December 31 of the respective year, were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS because the effect would be antidilutive:
             
Stock options  459   583   381 
Restricted stock awards     82   30 
Warrant  378   378    
          
   837   1,043   411 
          
(16.) EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Defined Benefit Pension Plan
The Company participates in The New York State Bankers Retirement System (the “Plan”), which is a defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all employees.employees, subject to the limitations related to the plan closure effective December 31, 2006. The benefits are based on years of service and the employee’s highest average compensation during five consecutive years of employment.
The defined benefit plan was closed to new participants effective December 31, 2006. Only employees hired on or before December 31, 2006 and who meetmet participation requirements on or before January 1, 2008 shall beare eligible to receive benefits.
The following table sets forthprovides a reconciliation of the definedchanges in the plan’s benefit pension plan’s change in benefit obligationobligations, fair value of assets and change in plan assets usinga statement of the most recent actuarial datafunded status at September 30 (measurement date for plan accounting and disclosure)their respective measurement dates (in thousands):
         
  December 31,  December 31, 
  2009  2008(a) 
Change in projected benefit obligation:        
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of period $(30,878) $(25,102)
Service cost  (1,689)  (1,820)
Interest cost  (1,826)  (1,953)
Actuarial loss  (489)  (3,767)
Benefits paid and plan expenses  1,441   1,764 
       
Projected benefit obligation at end of period  (33,441)  (30,878)
       
         
Change in plan assets:        
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period  24,431   28,431 
Actual return (loss) on plan assets  5,132   (7,436)
Employer contributions  5,081   5,200 
Benefits paid and plan expenses  (1,441)  (1,764)
       
Fair value of plan assets as of end of period  33,203   24,431 
       
Unfunded status at end of period $(238) $(6,447)
       
(a)Beginning in 2008, the plan’s measurement date was changed from September 30 to December 31. As a result, the 2008 period includes the 15 months of activity from September 30, 2007 through December 31, 2008.

76

- 93 -


             
(Dollars in thousands) 2006  2005  2004 
 
Change in benefit obligation:            
Benefit obligation at beginning of year $(25,966) $(22,704) $(20,080)
Service cost  (1,725)  (1,578)  (1,374)
Interest cost  (1,341)  (1,285)  (1,186)
Actuarial gain (loss)  1,928   (1,354)  (968)
Benefits paid  1,093   765   747 
Plan expenses  205   190   157 
          
Benefit obligation at end of year  (25,806)  (25,966)  (22,704)
             
Change in plan assets:            
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year  22,953   19,962   17,560 
Actual return on plan assets  2,698   2,367   1,900 
Employer contributions  1,568   1,579   1,406 
Benefits paid  (1,093)  (765)  (747)
Plan expenses  (205)  (190)  (157)
          
Fair value of plan assets at end of year  25,921   22,953   19,962 
          
             
Unfunded status  115   (3,013)  (2,742)
Unamortized net asset at transition     (26)  (64)
Unrecognized net loss subsequent to transition     6,050   5,648 
Unamortized prior service cost     195   213 
          
             
Prepaid pension asset, included in other assets $115  $3,206  $3,055 
          
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(16.) EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)
The accumulated benefit obligation was $21.8$29.5 million and $27.1 million at September 30, 2006December 31, 2009 and 2005,2008, respectively.
Net periodic pension cost consists of the following components for the years ended September 30:
             
(Dollars in thousands) 2006  2005  2004 
 
Service cost $1,725  $1,578  $1,374 
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation  1,341   1,285   1,186 
Expected return on plan assets  (1,866)  (1,632)  (1,436)
Amortization of net transition asset  (26)  (38)  (38)
Amortization of unrecognized loss  223   218   219 
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost  14   18   18 
          
             
Net periodic pension cost $1,411  $1,429  $1,323 
          
The actuarial assumptions used to determine the net periodic pension cost were as follows:
             
  2006  2005  2004 
   
Weighted average discount rate  5.25%  5.75%  6.00%
Expected long-term rate of return  7.50%  8.00%  8.00%
Rate of compensation increase  3.50%  3.00%  3.00%
The actuarial assumptions used to determine the accumulated benefit obligation were as follows:
             
  2006  2005  2004 
   
Weighted average discount rate  5.82%  5.25%  5.75%
Expected long-term rate of return  7.50%  8.00%  8.00%
The weighted average discount rate was derived using an actuarial discount rate model based on expected cash outflows from the plan.
The expected long-term rate-of-return on plan assets reflects long-term earnings expectations on existing plan assets and those contributions expected to be received during the current plan year. In estimating that rate,

77


appropriate consideration was given to historical returns earned by plan assets in the fund and the rates of return expected to be available for reinvestment. Average rates of return over the past 1,3,5 and 10 year periods were determined and subsequently adjusted to reflect current capital market assumptions and changes in investment allocations.
The estimated amounts that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into net periodic benefit cost in 2007 are as follows:
     
(Dollars in thousands) 2007 
 
Unrecognized loss $31 
Prior service cost  11 
    
     
Total $42 
    
The pension plan weighted average asset allocations by asset category are as follows at September 30:
         
(Dollars in thousands) 2006  2005 
 
Asset category:        
Equity securities  59.8%  58.8%
Debt securities  39.9   41.2 
Other  0.3    
       
         
Total  100.0%  100.0%
       
The New York State Bankers Retirement System (the “System”) was established in 1938 to provide for the payment of benefits to employees of participating banks. The System is overseen by a Board of Trustees who meet quarterly to set the investment policy guidelines.
The System utilizes two investment management firms, each investing approximately 50% of the total portfolio. The System’s investment objective is to exceed the investment benchmarks in each asset category. Each firm operates under a separate written investment policy approved by the Trustees and designed to achieve an allocation approximating 60% (may vary from 50%-70%) invested in equity securities and 40% (may vary from 30%-50%) invested in debt securities. Each firm reports at least quarterly to the Investment Committee and semi-annually to the Board.
The Company’s funding policy is to contribute, at a minimum, an actuarially determined amount that will satisfy the minimum funding requirements determined under the appropriate sections of Internal Revenue Code. The Company satisfied the minimum required contribution is zeroto its pension plan of $1.5 million for the 2010 fiscal year prior to December 31, 2009.
Estimated benefit payments under the pension plan over the next ten years at December 31, 2009 are as follows (in thousands):
     
2010 $1,264 
2011  1,357 
2012  1,465 
2013  1,538 
2014  1,657 
2015 – 2019  10,886 
Net periodic pension cost consists of the following components for the years ended December 31 2007, however(in thousands):
             
  2009  2008  2007 
Service cost $1,689  $1,456  $1,498 
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation  1,826   1,562   1,473 
Expected return on plan assets  (1,848)  (2,094)  (1,907)
Amortization of unrecognized loss  728      31 
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost  11   11   11 
          
 
Net periodic pension cost $2,406  $935  $1,106 
          
The actuarial assumptions used to determine the Companynet periodic pension cost were as follows:
             
  2009  2008  2007 
Weighted average discount rate  6.03%  6.35%  5.82%
Rate of compensation increase  3.50%  3.50%  3.50%
Expected long-term rate of return  7.50%  7.50%  7.50%
 
The actuarial assumptions used to determine the projected benefit obligation were as follows:
             
   2009   2008   2007 
Weighted average discount rate  5.89%  6.03%  6.35%
Rate of compensation increase  3.50%  3.50%  3.50%
The weighted average discount rate was based upon the projected benefit cash flows and the market yields of high grade corporate bonds that are available to pay such cash flows.

- 94 -


FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(16.) EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)
The weighted average expected long-term rate of return is considering makingestimated based on current trends in Plan’s assets as well as projected future rates of return on those assets and reasonable actuarial assumptions based on the guidance provided by Actuarial Standard of Practice No. 27, “Selection of Economic Assumptions for Measuring Pension Obligations”, for long term inflation, and the real and nominal rate of investment return for a discretionary contributionspecific mix of asset classes. The following assumptions were used in determining the long-term rate of return:
Equity securitiesDividend discount model, the smoothed earnings yield model and the equity risk premium model
Fixed income securitiesCurrent yield-to-maturity and forecasts of future yields
Other financial instrumentsComparison of the specific investment’s risk to that of fixed income and equity instruments and using judgment
The long term rate of return considers historical returns. Adjustments were made to historical returns in order to reflect expectations of future returns. These adjustments were due to factor forecasts by economists and long-term U.S. Treasury yields to forecast long-term inflation. In addition forecasts by economists and others for long-term GDP growth were factored into the development of assumptions for earnings growth and per capital income. The Plan’s overall investment strategy is to achieve a mix of approximately 97% of investments for long-term growth and 3% for near-term benefit payments with a wide diversification of asset types, fund strategies, and fund managers. The target allocations for Plan assets are shown in the table below. Cash equivalents consist primarily of short term investment funds. Equity securities primarily include investments in common stock and depository receipts. Fixed income securities include corporate bonds, government issues and mortgage backed securities. Other financial instruments primarily include rights and warrants.
Effective March 2009, the Plan revised its investment guidelines. The Plan currently prohibits its investment managers from purchasing the following investments;
Equity securitiesSecurities in emerging market countries as defined by the Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Index, Short sales, Unregistered securities and Margin purchases
Fixed income securitiesSecurities of BBB quality or less, CMOs that have an inverse floating rate and whose payments don’t include principal or which aren’t certified and guaranteed by the U.S. Government, ABSs that aren’t issued or guaranteed by the U.S., or its agencies or its instrumentalities, Non-agency residential subprime or ALT-A MBSs and Structured Notes
Other financial instrumentsUnhedged currency exposure in countries not defined as “high income economies” by the World Bank
All other investments not prohibited by the Plan are permitted. At December 31, 2009 the Plan holds certain investments which are no longer deemed acceptable to acquire. These positions will be liquidated when the investment managers deem that such liquidation is in the best interest of the Plan.
                 
              Weighted 
              Average 
  Target  Percentage of Plan Assets  Expected 
  Allocation  at December 31,  Long-term 
  2010  2009  2008  Rate of Return 
Asset category:                
Cash equivalents  0 – 20%  13.6%  10.0%   
Equity securities  40 – 60   45.9   48.0   4.60%
Fixed income securities  40 – 60   40.5   41.4   2.10 
Other financial instruments  0 – 5      0.6    

- 95 -


FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(16.) EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)
In accordance with ASC 820, the following table (rounded to the pension plan during 2007.nearest thousands) represents the Plan’s fair value hierarchy for its financial assets (investments) measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2009 (in thousands):
                 
  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 
  Inputs  Inputs  Inputs  Fair Value 
Cash equivalents:                
Short term investment funds $  $4,197  $  $4,197 
             
Equity securities:                
Common stock  15,016         15,016 
Depository receipts  210         210 
Other equities  166         166 
             
Total equities  15,392         15,392 
             
Fixed income securities:                
Corporate bonds     3,200      3,200 
Government issues     5,590      5,590 
Collateralized mortgage obligations     813      813 
FHLMC     1,359      1,359 
FNMA     2,094      2,094 
GNMA I     369      369 
Other fixed income securities     189      189 
             
Total fixed income securities     13,614      13,614 
             
Total Plan investments $15,392  $17,811  $  $33,203 
             
The future benefit payments that reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expectedfollowing is a reconciliation of Level 3 assets for which significant unobservable inputs were used to be paid as follows:determine fair value (in thousands):
Future pension benefit payments in year ending December 31:
     
(Dollars in thousands)    
 
2007 $1,019 
2008  1,022 
2009  1,045 
2010  1,091 
2011  1,166 
2012-2016  7,943 
     
Balance at beginning of year $132 
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)  54 
Realized loss  (58)
Sale proceeds  (128)
    
Balance at end of year $ 
    
Postretirement Benefit Plan
Prior to December 31, 2001, BNBan entity acquired by the Company provided health and dental care benefits to retired employees who met specified age and service requirements through a postretirement health and dental care plan in which both BNBthe acquired entity and the retireeretirees shared the cost. The plan provided for substantially the same medical insurance coverage as for active employees until their death and was integrated with Medicare for those retirees aged 65 or older. In 2001, the plan’s eligibility requirements were amended to curtail eligible benefit payments to only retired employees

78


and active participants who were fully vested under the Plan. In 2003, retirees under age 65 began contributing to health coverage at the same cost-sharing level as that of active employees. The retirees aged 65 or older were offered new Medicare supplemental plans as alternatives to the plan historically offered. The cost sharing of medical coverage was standardized throughout the group of retirees aged 65 or older. In addition, to be consistent with the administration of the Company’s dental plan for active employees, all retirees who continued dental coverage began paying the full monthly premium. The accrued liability included in other liabilities in the consolidated statements of financial condition related to this plan amounted to $447,000$155 thousand and $806,000$144 thousand as of December 31, 20062009 and 2005,2008, respectively. The postretirement expense for the plan that was included in salaries and employee benefits in the consolidated statements of operations was not significant for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007. The plan is not funded.

- 96 -


FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(16.) EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss related to the defined benefit plan and postretirement benefit plan, on a pre-tax basis at December 31, are summarized below (in thousands):
         
  2009  2008 
Defined benefit plan:
        
Net actuarial loss $(9,056) $(12,579)
Prior service cost  (143)  (155)
       
   (9,199)  (12,734)
       
         
Postretirement benefit plan:
        
Net actuarial loss  (248)  (238)
Prior service credit  710   778 
       
   462   540 
       
Total recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss $(8,737) $(12,194)
       
Changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) on a pre-tax basis during the years ended December 31 are as follows (in thousands):
         
  2009  2008 
Defined benefit plan:
        
Net actuarial gain (loss) $2,795  $(14,097)
Amortization of net loss  728    
Amortization of prior service cost  12   14 
       
   3,535   (14,083)
       
         
Postretirement benefit plan:
        
Net actuarial gain (loss)  (10)  70 
Amortization of prior service credit  (68)  (85)
       
   (78)  (15)
       
Total recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) $3,457  $(14,098)
       
For the year ending December 31, 2010, the estimated net loss and prior service cost for the plan that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost is $458 thousand and $12 thousand, respectively.
Defined Contribution Plan
Employees that meet certain age and service requirements are eligible to participate in the Company sponsored 401(k) plan. Under the plan, participants may make contributions, in the form of salary deferrals, up to the maximum Internal Revenue Code limit. The Company matches a participant’s contributions up to 4.5% of compensation, calculated as 100% of the first 3% of compensation and 50% of the next 3% of compensation deferred by the participant. The Company may also make additional discretionary matching contributions, although no such additional discretionary contributions were made in 2009, 2008 or 2007. The expense included in salaries and employee benefits in the consolidated statements of incomeoperations for this plan was not significantamounted to $914 thousand, $993 thousand and $869 thousand in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans
The Company maintains a non-qualified supplemental executive retirement plan (“SERP”) for one current and one former executive. The Company has accrued a liability, all of which is unfunded, of $957 thousand as of December 31, 2009. The Company recorded expense of $648 thousand and $309 thousand in connection with these SERPs during the years ended December 31, 2006, 20052009 and 2004.
Defined Contribution Plan
The Company also sponsors a defined contribution profit sharing (401(k)) plan covering substantially all employees. The Company matches certain percentages of each eligible employee’s contribution to the plan. The expense included in salaries and employee benefits in the consolidated statements of income2008, respectively. There were no amounts recorded for this plan amounted to $553,000, $301,000 and $1.1 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
(14) Stock Compensation Plans
The Company has a Management Stock Incentive Plan and a Director’s Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plans”). Under the Plans, the Company may grant stock options to purchase shares of common stock, shares of restricted stock or stock appreciation rights to its directors and key employees. The Company had previously only granted stock options to purchase shares of common stock under the Plans, but during the third quarter of 2006, restricted stock awards were granted to certain Executives and Senior Officers of the Management team. Grants under the plans may be made up to 10% of the number of shares of common stock issued, including treasury shares. The exercise price of each option equals the market price of the Company’s stock on the date of the grant. The maximum term of each option is ten years and the vesting period generally ranges between three and five years.
Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company applied Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, and related interpretations in accounting for stock-based compensation. No stock-based compensation expense was recognized in the consolidated statements of incomethese SERPs prior to 2006 for stock options, as the exercise price was equal to the market price of the common stock on the date of all grants made by the Company.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment”, requiring the Company to recognize expense related to the fair value of the stock-based compensation awards. The Company elected the modified prospective transition method as permitted by SFAS No. 123(R); accordingly, results from prior periods have not been restated. Under the transition method, stock-based compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2006 includes:
(a)compensation expense for all stock-based compensation awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of December 31, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”; and
(b)compensation expense for all stock-based compensation awards granted subsequent to December 31, 2005, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R).
Historically, SFAS No. 123 required pro forma disclosure of stock-based compensation expense and the Company has recognized pro forma compensation expense for stock option awards on a straight-line basis over the applicable vesting periods. This policy differs from the policy required to be applied to awards granted after the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), which requires that compensation expense be recognized for awards over the requisite service period of the award or to an employee’s eligible retirement date, if earlier. The Company will recognize compensation expense over the remaining vesting periods for awards granted prior to adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), and for all awards after December 31, 2005, compensation expense will be recognized over the award’s requisite service period or over a period ending with an employee’s eligible retirement date, if earlier.2008.

79


The expense associated with the amortization of unvested stock compensation included in the consolidated statements of income for the year ended December 31, 2006 is as follows:
     
(Dollars in thousands) 2006 
 
Stock options:    
Management Stock Incentive Plan (1) $522 
Director Stock Incentive Plan (2)  299 
    
     
Total amortization of unvested stock options  821 
     
Restricted stock awards:    
Management Stock Incentive Plan (1)  44 
    
     
Total amortization of unvested restricted stock awards  44 
    
     
Total amortization of unvested stock compensation $865 
    
(1)Included in salaries and employee benefits in the consolidated statements of income.
(2)Included in other noninterest expense in the consolidated statements of income.
The following table summarizes the stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 2006:
                 
          Weighted    
      Weighted  Average    
      Average  Remaining    
      Exercise  Contractual  Aggregate 
      Price  Term  Intrinsic 
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) Options  per Share  (in Years)  Value 
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2005  426,238  $19.58         
Granted  99,597   19.73         
Exercised  (10,355)  18.90         
Forfeited  (5,298)  21.24         
Expired  (11,250)  22.82         
               
Outstanding at December 31, 2006  498,932  $19.54   5.78  $1,975 
                 
Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2006  473,320  $19.49   5.63  $1,910 
                 
Exercisable at December 31, 2006  309,649  $18.94   3.99  $1,481 
As of December 31, 2006, there was $734,000 of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock options that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.13 years.
The weighted average grant date fair value and Black-Scholes option valuation assumptions used for the stock option grants totaling 99,597, 143,263 and 104,234 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively were as follows:
             
  2006  2005  2004 
 
Fair value of stock options granted $8.14  $6.35  $9.25 
Risk-free interest rate  4.96%(1)  4.17%  4.20%
Expected dividend yield  1.65%  1.94%  2.69%
Expected stock price volatility  41.75%(2)  26.79%  35.70%
Expected term of stock options (in years) 6.19 yrs (3) 6.22 yrs  10.00 yrs 
(1)Based on the average of the five and seven year Treasury constant maturity (“TCM”) interest rates that is consistent with the expected term of the stock options.
(2)Expected stock price volatility is based on actual experience using a historical period that is consistent with the expected term of the stock options.
(3)The Company estimated the expected term of the stock options using the simplified method prescribed by SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 107.

80


The aggregate intrinsic value of option (the amount by which the market price of the stock on the date of exercise exceeded the market price of the stock on the date of grant) exercises for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $54,000, $322,000 and $511,000, respectively. The total cash received as a result of option exercises under stock compensation plans for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $196,000, $940,000 and $1.1 million, respectively. In connection with these option exercises, the tax benefits realized from stock compensation plans were $22,000, $129,000 and $204,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
The following table summarizes the restricted stock award activity for the year ended December 31, 2006:
         
      Weighted Average 
      Market Price 
  Shares  at Grant Date 
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2005    $ 
Awarded  13,200   19.75 
Vested      
Forfeited      
       
Outstanding at December 31, 2006  13,200  $19.75 
As of December 31, 2006, there was $217,000 of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested restricted stock awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.41 years.
(15) Earnings Per Common Share
Basic earnings per share, after giving effect to preferred stock dividends, has been computed using weighted average common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share reflect the effects, if any, of incremental common shares issuable upon exercise of dilutive stock options.
Earnings per common share have been computed based on the following for the years ended December 31:
             
(Dollars in thousands) 2006  2005  2004 
 
Income from continuing operations $17,362  $4,618  $12,943 
             
Less: Preferred stock dividends  1,486   1,488   1,495 
          
             
Income from continuing operations available to common shareholders  15,876   3,130   11,448 
             
Loss on discontinued operations, net of tax     (2,452)  (450)
          
             
Net income available to common shareholders $15,876  $678  $10,998 
          
             
Weighted average number of common shares used to calculate basic earnings per common share  11,328   11,303   11,192 
             
Add: Effect of common stock equivalents  36   31   48 
          
             
Weighted average number of common shares used to calculate diluted earnings per common share  11,364   11,334   11,240 
          
There were approximately 251,000, 354,000 and 229,000 weighted average common stock equivalents from outstanding stock options for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively that were not considered in the calculation of diluted earnings per share since their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
(16) Supervision and Regulation
The supervision and regulation of financial and bank holding companies and their subsidiaries is intended primarily for the protection of depositors, the deposit insurance funds regulated by the FDIC and the banking system as a whole, and not for the protection of shareholders or creditors of bank holding companies. The various bank regulatory agencies have broad enforcement power over bank holding companies and banks, including the

81


power to impose substantial fines, operational restrictions and other penalties for violations of laws and regulations.
The Bank is required to maintain a reserve balance at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The reserve requirements for the Bank totaled $1.2 million and $1.0 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
The Company is also subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
For evaluating regulatory capital adequacy, companies are required to determine capital and assets under regulatory accounting practices. Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company to maintain minimum amounts and ratios. The leverage ratio requirement is based on period-end capital to average adjusted total assets during the previous three months. Compliance with risk-based capital requirements is determined by dividing regulatory capital by the sum of a company’s weighted asset values. Risk weightings are established by the regulators for each asset category according to the perceived degree of risk. As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company and FSB met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.
The Bank must pay assessments to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) for federal deposit insurance protection. The FDIC has adopted a risk-based assessment system as required by the FDIC Improvement Act. Under this system, FDIC-insured depository institutions pay insurance premiums at rates based on their risk classification. Institutions assigned to higher risk classifications (that is, institutions that pose a greater risk of loss to their respective deposit insurance funds) pay assessments at higher rates than institutions that pose a lower risk. An institution’s risk classification is assigned based on its capital levels and the level of supervisory concern the institution poses to the regulators. In addition, the FDIC can impose special assessments in certain instances.
Prior to the Company’s restructuring in December 2005, the Company’s former bank subsidiaries NBG and BNB were operating under formal agreements with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”), which resulted in a higher FDIC risk classification and the Company experienced an increase in FDIC insurance premiums in 2005. As a result of the merger of the Company’s subsidiary banks and the lower risk classification for FSB, the FDIC insurance premiums decreased in 2006. FDIC insurance premiums, included in other noninterest expense in the consolidated statements of income, amounted to $215,000, $1,368,000 and $566,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Payments of dividends by the subsidiary Bank to FII are limited or restricted in certain circumstances under banking regulations. During September 2006, FII requested approval from the NYS Banking Department to pay a $25.0 million cash dividend from FSB to FII. Regulatory approval was necessary as the requested dividend amount exceeded the amount allowable under regulations. During October 2006, FSB received regulatory approval and paid the $25.0 million dividend to FII. FSB will be required to obtain approval from the NYS Banking Department for any future dividend that exceeds the sum of the current year’s net income plus the retained profits for the preceding two years. FII used the dividend proceeds to repay a $25.0 million term loan with another commercial bank during October 2006.
The following is a summary of the actual capital amounts and ratios for the Company and the Bank(s) as of December 31:

82


                         
(Dollars in thousands) 2006
  Actual Regulatory    
  Capital Minimum Requirements Well-Capitalized
  Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
 
Leverage capital (Tier 1) as percent of three-month average assets:                        
Company $168,729   8.91% $75,784   4.00% $94,731   5.00%
FSB  152,328   8.06   75,584   4.00   94,480   5.00 
                         
As percent of risk-weighted, period-end assets:                        
Core capital (Tier 1):                        
Company  168,729   15.85   42,587   4.00   63,881   6.00 
FSB  152,328   14.35   42,446   4.00   63,669   6.00 
                         
Total capital (Tiers 1 and 2):                        
Company  182,084   17.10   85,175   8.00   106,469   10.00 
FSB  165,639   15.61   84,892   8.00   106,115   10.00 
                         
(Dollars in thousands) 2005
  Actual Regulatory    
  Capital Minimum Requirements Well-Capitalized
  Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
 
Leverage capital (Tier 1) as percent of three-month average assets:                        
Company $155,296   7.60% $81,709   4.00% $102,137   5.00%
FSB  166,989   8.20   81,477   4.00   101,846   5.00 
                         
As percent of risk-weighted, period-end assets:                        
Core capital (Tier 1):                        
Company  155,296   13.75   45,171   4.00   67,757   6.00 
FSB  166,989   14.87   44,923   4.00   67,385   6.00 
                         
Total capital (Tiers 1 and 2):                        
Company  169,487   15.01   90,342   8.00   112,928   10.00 
FSB  181,104   16.13   89,847   8.00   112,309   10.00 

83- 97 -


(17)FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(17.) FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Determination of Fair Value of Financial Instruments— Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis
Valuation Hierarchy
The “fair value”fair value of an asset or liability is the price that would be received to sell that asset or paid to transfer that liability in an orderly transaction occurring in the principal market (or most advantageous market in the absence of a financial instrumentprincipal market) for such asset or liability. ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is defined as follows:
Level 1— Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the price a willing buyer and a willing seller would exchange inreporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2— Inputs other than a distressed sale situation. The following table presentsquoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the carrying amounts and estimatedasset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by market data by correlation or other means.
Level 3— Unobservable inputs for determining the fair values of assets or liabilities that reflect an entity’s own assumptions about the Company’s financial instruments at December 31:assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities.
                 
(Dollars in thousands) 2006  2005 
  Carrying  Fair  Carrying  Fair 
  Amount  Value  Amount  Value 
 
Financial Assets                
Cash and cash equivalents $109,772  $109,772  $91,940  $91,940 
Securities available for sale  735,148   735,148   790,855   790,855 
Securities held to maturity  40,388   40,421   42,593   42,898 
Loans held for sale  992   993   1,253   1,261 
Loans, net  909,434   907,435   972,090   970,361 
Accrued interest receivable  9,160   9,160   8,822   8,822 
FHLB and FRB stock  6,485   6,485   7,158   7,158 
                 
Financial Liabilities                
Deposits:                
Noninterest-bearing demand  273,783   273,783   284,958   284,958 
Interest-bearing:                
Savings and interest-bearing demand  674,224   674,224   755,229   755,229 
Certificates of deposit  669,688   669,688   677,074   677,074 
             
Total deposits  1,617,695   1,617,695   1,717,261   1,717,261 
Short-term borrowings  32,310   32,310   20,106   20,106 
Long-term borrowings  38,187   37,037   78,391   74,316 
Junior subordinated debentures  16,702   17,533   16,702   18,048 
Accrued interest payable  13,132   13,132   11,966   11,966 
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate theIn general, fair value of each class of financial instruments.
Cash and cash equivalents:The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated statements of financial condition for cash, due from banks, federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits approximate the fair value of those assets.
Securities:Fair value is based onupon quoted market prices, where available. WhereIf such quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon internally developed models that primarily use, as inputs, observable market-based parameters. Valuation adjustments may be made to ensure that financial instruments are recorded at fair value. These adjustments may include amounts to reflect counterparty credit quality and the company’s creditworthiness, among other things, as well as unobservable parameters. Any such valuation adjustments are applied consistently over time. The Company’s valuation methodologies may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. While management believes the Company’s valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date. Furthermore, the reported fair value amounts have not been comprehensively revalued since the presentation dates, and therefore, estimates of fair value after the balance sheet date may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein. A more detailed description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, is set forth below.
Investment Securities.Publicly traded equity securities (stocks) are reported at fair value utilizing Level 1 inputs. Pooled trust preferred securities are reported at fair value utilizing Level 3 inputs. Fair values for these securities are determined through the use of internal valuation methodologies appropriate for the specific asset, which may include the use of a discounted expected cash flow analysis or the use of broker quotes. Other securities classified as available for sale are reported at fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs. For these securities, the Company obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the bond’s terms and conditions, among other things.

- 98 -


FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(17.) FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)
Assets Measured at Fair Value on quoteda Recurring Basis
Assets measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 were as follows (in thousands):
                 
  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 
  Inputs  Inputs  Inputs  Fair Value 
December 31, 2009:
                
Securities available for sale:                
U.S. Government agencies and government sponsored enterprises $  $134,105  $  $134,105 
State and political subdivisions     83,659      83,659 
Mortgage-backed securities     361,515      361,515 
Asset-backed securities:                
Trust preferred securities        1,015   1,015 
Other     207      207 
             
  $  $579,486  $1,015  $580,501 
             
                 
December 31, 2008:
                
Securities available for sale:                
U.S. Government agencies and government sponsored enterprises $  $68,173  $  $68,173 
State and political subdivisions     131,711      131,711 
Mortgage-backed securities     342,552      342,552 
Asset-backed securities:                
Trust preferred securities        3,772   3,772 
Other     146      146 
Equity securities  624   528      1,152 
             
  $624  $543,110  $3,772  $547,506 
             
Changes in Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
The reconciliation for all assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, is as follows (in thousands):
         
  2009  2008 
Securities available for sale (Level 3), beginning of year $3,772  $ 
Transfers into Level 3     33,307 
Capitalized interest  296    
Principal paydowns and amortization of premiums  (9)  (106)
Coupon payments applied to principal  (273)   
Total losses (realized/unrealized):        
Included in earnings  (2,263)  (29,429)
Included in other comprehensive income  (508)   
       
  
Securities available for sale (Level 3), end of year $1,015  $3,772 
       

- 99 -


FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(17.) FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)
Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
Certain financial assets and financial liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment). Examples of these nonrecurring uses of fair value include: loans held for sale, mortgage servicing assets and collateral dependent impaired loans. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had no liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.
Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value. As of December 31, 2009, loans held for sale were reduced to their fair value of $421 thousand by a $4 thousand increase in their valuation allowance. Fair value is based on observable market pricesrates for comparable loan products which is considered a level 2 fair value measurement.
Mortgage servicing rights (“MSR”) are carried at the lower of cost or fair value. Due primarily to a decline in the estimated prepayment speed of the Company’s sold loan portfolio with servicing retained the fair value of the Company’s MSR increased during 2009. As a result of this increase, the Company reduced its corresponding valuation allowance by $177 thousand during the year ended December 31, 2009. A valuation allowance of $185 thousand existed as of December 31, 2009. The mortgage servicing rights are a Level 3 fair value measurement, as fair value is determined by calculating the present value of the future servicing cash flows from the underlying mortgage loans.
Certain impaired loans were remeasured and reported at fair value through a specific valuation allowance allocation of the allowance for loan losses based upon the fair value of the underlying collateral. Impaired loans with a carrying value of $1.9 million were reduced by specific valuation allowance allocations totaling $854 thousand to a total reported fair value of $1.1 million. The collateral dependent impaired loans are a Level 2 fair measurement, as fair value is determined based upon estimates of the fair value of the collateral underlying the impaired loans typically using appraisals of comparable instruments.property or valuation guides.
Nonfinancial Assets and Nonfinancial Liabilities
Certain nonfinancial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis include nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities measured at fair value in the second step of a goodwill impairment test, and intangible assets and other nonfinancial long-lived assets measured at fair value for impairment assessment. There were no nonfinancial assets or nonfinancial liabilities measured at fair value during the year ended December 31, 2009.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Fair Value of Financial Instruments Subsection of the ASC requires disclosure of the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including those financial assets and financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or non-recurring basis.
The following discussion describes the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured or disclosed at fair value. The techniques utilized in estimating the fair values of financial instruments are reliant on the assumptions used, including discount rates and estimates of the amount and timing of future cash flows. Care should be exercised in deriving conclusions about our business, its value or financial position based on the fair value information of financial instruments presented below.
Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on available market information and judgments about the financial instrument, including estimates of timing, amount of expected future cash flows and the credit standing of the issuer. Such estimates do not consider the tax impact of the realization of unrealized gains or losses. In some cases, the fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets. In addition, the disclosed fair value may not be realized in the immediate settlement of the financial instrument.

- 100 -


FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(17.) FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)
The estimated fair value approximates carrying value for cash and cash equivalents, FHLB and FRB stock, company owned life insurance, accrued interest receivable, short-term borrowings and accrued interest payable. Fair value estimates for other financial instruments are discussed below.
Loans held for sale:sale.The fair value of loans held for sale is based on estimates, quoted market prices and investor commitments.
Loans, net:Loans.For variable rate loans that re-price frequently, fair value approximates carrying amount. The fair value for fixed rate loans is estimated through discounted cash flow analysis using interest rates currently being offered on loans with similar terms and credit quality. For criticized and classified loans, fair value is estimated by discounting expected cash flows at a rate commensurate with the risk associated with the estimated cash flows, or estimates of fair value discounts based on observable market information.
Accrued interest receivable/payable:Deposits.The carrying amounts of accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable approximate their fair values because of the relatively short time period between the accrual period and the expected receipt or payment due date.
FHLB and FRB stock:The carrying amounts, which represent par value or cost, reported in the consolidated statements of financial condition for the non-marketable investments in FHLB and FRB stock approximate the fair value of those assets.
Deposits:The fair value for savings, interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing demand accounts, ismoney market and savings deposits are equal to thetheir carrying amount because of the customer’s ability to withdraw funds immediately.amounts. The fair values of certificates

84


of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow approach that applies prevailing market interest rates for similar maturity instruments. The unrealized gains on certificates of deposit are limited to the amount of prepayment penalties, if any. Fair value can only exceed the carrying amount to the extent of withdrawal fees.
Short-term Borrowings:Carrying value approximates fair value for short-term borrowings.
Long-term Borrowings:borrowings (excluding junior subordinated debentures).The fair value for long-term borrowings is estimated using a discounted cash flow approach that applies prevailing market interest rates for similar maturity instruments.
Junior subordinated debentures and trust preferred securities:debentures.The fair value for the junior subordinated debentures is estimated using a discounted cash flow approach that applies prevailing market interest rates for similar maturity instruments.
Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments:The fair value of stand-by letters of credit and commitments to extend credita financial instrument is the current amount that would be exchanged between willing parties, other than in a forced liquidation. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company’s various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements.assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument. The accounting guidelines exclude certain financial instruments and all non-financial instruments from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 may not necessarily represent the underlying fair value of these fees is not significant.the Company.
The carrying values and fair values of financial instruments at December 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows (in thousands):
                 
  December 31, 2009  December 31, 2008 
      Estimated      Estimated 
  Carrying  Fair  Carrying  Fair 
  Amount  Value  Amount  Value 
Financial assets:
                
Cash and cash equivalents $42,959  $42,959  $55,187  $55,187 
Securities available for sale  580,501   580,501   547,506   547,506 
Securities held to maturity  39,573   40,629   58,532   59,147 
Loans held for sale  421   421   1,013   1,032 
Loans  1,243,265   1,290,136   1,102,330   1,169,660 
Company owned life insurance  24,867   24,867   23,692   23,692 
Accrued interest receivable  7,386   7,386   7,556   7,556 
FHLB and FRB stock  7,185   7,185   6,035   6,035 
                 
Financial liabilities:
                
Demand, savings and money market deposits  1,056,604   1,056,604   985,796   985,796 
Certificate of deposit  686,351   692,429   647,467   654,334 
Short-term borrowings  59,543   59,543   23,465   23,465 
Long-term borrowings (excluding junior subordinated debentures)  30,145   30,886   30,653   32,005 
Junior subordinated debentures  16,702   10,741   16,702   12,232 
Accrued interest payable  7,576   7,576   7,041   7,041 

85

- 101 -


(18) Condensed Parent Company Only Financial StatementsFINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(18.) PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following arecondensed statements of condition of the Parent as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the related condensed statements of operations and cash flows for 2009, 2008 and 2007 should be read in conjunction with consolidated financial statements of FII as of and for the years ended December 31:related notes (in thousands):
Condensed Statements of Condition
         
Condensed Statements of Condition 2009  2008 
Assets:        
Cash and due from subsidiaries $7,727  $27,163 
Securities available for sale, at fair value     624 
Investment in and receivables due from subsidiaries  203,986   176,780 
Other assets  5,698   4,885 
       
Total assets $217,411  $209,452 
       
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity:        
Junior subordinated debentures $16,702  $16,702 
Other liabilities  2,415   2,450 
Shareholders’ equity  198,294   190,300 
       
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $217,411  $209,452 
       
         
(Dollars in thousands) 2006  2005 
 
Assets:        
Cash and due from subsidiaries $15,631  $11,417 
Securities available for sale, at fair value  1,087   1,034 
Note receivable  300   300 
Investment in and receivables due from subsidiaries and associated companies  182,467   199,743 
Other assets  4,340   5,251 
       
         
Total assets $203,825  $217,745 
       
         
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity        
Long-term borrowings $  $25,000 
Junior subordinated debentures  16,702   16,702 
Other liabilities  4,735   4,286 
Shareholders’ equity  182,388   171,757 
       
         
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $203,825  $217,745 
       
Condensed Statements of Income
                        
       
(Dollars in thousands) 2006 2005 2004 
Condensed Statements of Operations 2009 2008 2007 
Dividends from subsidiaries and associated companies $35,455 $5,872 $5,601  $5,051 $11,251 $14,151 
Management and service fees from subsidiaries 643 15,433 13,763  603 418 631 
Other income 427 75 143  182 74 94 
              
Total income 36,525 21,380 19,507  5,836 11,743 14,876 
 
Operating expenses 6,319 20,325 16,721  4,436 4,363 4,684 
              
 
Income before income tax benefit and (distributions in excess of earnings) equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries 30,206 1,055 2,786 
 
Income before income tax benefit and equity in undistributed earnings (distributions in excess of earnings) of subsidiaries 1,400 7,380 10,192 
Income tax benefit 2,164 1,904 1,164  1,286 1,499 1,491 
              
Income before equity in undistributed earnings (distributions in excess of earnings) of subsidiaries 2,686 8,879 11,683 
Equity in undistributed earnings (distributions in excess of earnings) of subsidiaries 11,755  (35,037) 4,726 
        
Income before (distributions in excess of earnings) equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries 32,370 2,959 3,950 
Net income (loss) $14,441 $(26,158) $16,409 
        
(Distributions in excess of earnings) equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries  (15,008)  (793) 8,543 
       
 
Net income $17,362 $2,166 $12,493 
       

86

- 102 -


Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
             
         
(Dollars in thousands) 2006  2005  2004 
 
Cash flows from operating activities:            
Net income $17,362  $2,166  $12,493 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:            
Depreciation and amortization  642   756   782 
Distributions in excess of earnings (equity in undistributed earnings) of subsidiaries  15,008   793   (8,543)
Increase in other assets  (211)  (852)  (2,609)
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities  1,120   (922)  1,423 
          
             
Net cash provided by operating activities  33,921   1,941   3,546 
          
             
Cash flows from investing activities:            
Proceeds from sale of securities  21      500 
Increase in note receivable        (300)
Proceeds from sale of equity investment in Mercantile Adjustment Bureau        2,400 
Net proceeds from sale of discontinued subsidiary     4,538    
Equity investment in subsidiaries     (512)  (150)
Purchase of premises and equipment, net  528   (388)  (261)
          
             
Net cash provided by investing activities  549   3,638   2,189 
          
             
Cash flows from financing activities:            
Repayment on long-term borrowings  (25,000)      
Purchase of preferred and common shares  (346)  (178)  (43)
Issuance of common shares  112   57   52 
Stock options exercised  196   940   1,131 
Excess tax benefit from stock options exercised  8       
Dividends paid  (5,226)  (6,902)  (8,652)
          
             
Net used in financing activities  (30,256)  (6,083)  (7,512)
          
             
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  4,214   (504)  (1,777)
             
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of year  11,417   11,921   13,698 
          
             
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year $15,631  $11,417  $11,921 
          

87


Selected Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)
                 
  First  Second  Third  Fourth 
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) Quarter  Quarter  Quarter  Quarter 
 
2006
                
Results of operations data:                
Interest income $25,275  $25,750  $25,823  $26,222 
Interest expense  9,796   10,738   11,141   11,929 
             
Net interest income  15,479   15,012   14,682   14,293 
Provision (credit) for loan losses  250   (1,601)  (491)   
             
Net interest income after provision (credit) for loan losses  15,229   16,613   15,173   14,293 
Noninterest income  4,956   5,181   6,979   4,795 
Noninterest expense  15,275   14,581   14,593   15,163 
             
Income before income taxes  4,910   7,213   7,559   3,925 
Income taxes  1,171   1,839   2,314   921 
             
Net income $3,739  $5,374  $5,245  $3,004 
             
                 
Per common share data:                
Net income — basic $0.30  $0.44  $0.43  $0.23 
Net income — diluted  0.30   0.44   0.43   0.23 
Cash dividends declared  0.08   0.08   0.09   0.09 
                 
2005
                
Results of operations data:                
Interest income $26,420  $25,818  $25,495  $26,154 
Interest expense  8,051   8,960   9,238   10,146 
             
Net interest income  18,369   16,858   16,257   16,008 
Provision for loan losses  3,692   21,889   1,529   1,422 
             
Net interest income (loss) after provision for loan losses  14,677   (5,031)  14,728   14,586 
Noninterest income  4,907   4,791   14,749   4,937 
Noninterest expense  16,418   16,592   16,312   16,170 
             
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes  3,166   (16,832)  13,165   3,353 
Income taxes from continuing operations  781   (7,264)  4,205   512 
             
Income (loss) from continuing operations  2,385   (9,568)  8,960   2,841 
(Loss) income from discontinued operation, net of income taxes  (96)  (2,397)  11   30 
             
Net income (loss) $2,289  $(11,965) $8,971  $2,871 
             
                 
Per common share data:                
Basic:                
Income (loss) from continuing operations $0.18  $(0.88) $0.76  $0.22 
Net income (loss)  0.17   (1.09)  0.76   0.22 
Diluted:                
Income (loss) from continuing operations  0.18   (0.88)  0.76   0.22 
Net income (loss)  0.17   (1.09)  0.76   0.22 
Cash dividends declared  0.16   0.08   0.08   0.08 

88


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors ofFINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Financial Institutions, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of Financial Institutions, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 20062009, 2008 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.2007
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
(18.)
PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Continued)
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO),and our report dated March 13, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment of, and the effective operation of, internal control over financial reporting.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), “Share Based Payments” and SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans” for the year ended December 31, 2006.
KPMG LLP
Buffalo, New York
March 13, 2007
             
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows 2009  2008  2007 
Cash flows from operating activities:            
Net income (loss) $14,441  $(26,158) $16,409 
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:            
(Equity in undistributed earnings) distributions in excess of earnings of subsidiaries  (11,755)  35,037   (4,726)
Depreciation and amortization  318   427   521 
Share-based compensation  854   633   955 
Decrease (increase) in other assets  797   (763)  (242)
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities  (230)  (258)  (2,421)
          
Net cash provided by operating activities  4,425   8,918   10,496 
Cash flows from investing activities:            
Purchase of investment assets, net of disposals  (1,323)  (99)  189 
Capital investment in subsidiary bank  (15,000)  (20,000)   
          
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities  (16,323)  (20,099)  189 
Cash flows from financing activities:            
Purchase of preferred and common shares     (4,821)  (7,245)
Proceeds from issuance of preferred and common shares, net of issuance costs  (68)  35,602   105 
Proceeds from issuance of common stock warrant     2,025    
Proceeds from stock options exercised  15   32   251 
Dividends paid  (7,485)  (7,722)  (6,199)
          
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities  (7,538)  25,116   (13,088)
          
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents  (19,436)  13,935   (2,403)
Cash and cash equivalents as of beginning of year  27,163   13,228   15,631 
          
Cash and cash equivalents as of end of the year $7,727  $27,163  $13,228 
          

89

- 103 -


Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
ITEM 9.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ItemITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Effectiveness of Controls and Procedures
a) As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b), as adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this annual report.
Disclosure controls and procedures are the controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
b) All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Attestation Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Management of Financial Institutions, Inc. (the Company) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Management assessed the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2006,2009, the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting is included under Item 8 “Financial Statements and presentation.Supplementary Data” in Part II of this Form 10-K.
KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has audited the consolidated financial statements included in the annual report, and has issued an attestation report on management’s assessmentthe effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm that attests the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting is included under Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in Part II of this Form 10-K.
c) Changes toin Internal Control Overover Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 20062009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
d) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors of
Financial Institutions, Inc.:
We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanyingManagement’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting,that Financial Institutions, Inc. (the Company) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our

90


responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in a reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, management’s assessment that Financial Institutions, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statements of financial condition of Financial Institutions, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, and our report dated March 13, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
KPMG LLP
Buffalo, New York
March 13, 2007

91


ItemITEM 9B. Other InformationOTHER INFORMATION
None.Not applicable.

- 104 -


PART III
ItemITEM 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate GovernanceDIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
TheIn response to this Item, the information set forth in the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “2010 Proxy Statement”) to be filed within 120 days following the end of the Company’s fiscal year, under the headings “Election of Directors and Information with Respect to Board of Directors”Directors,” and “Corporate Governance Information”, which includes identifying the “audit committee financial expert” who serves on the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors and the information under the heading “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” areis incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days following the end of the Company’s fiscal year. reference.
The information under the heading “Executive Officers and Other Significant Employees of the Registrant” in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-K is also incorporated herein by referencereference.
Information concerning the Company’s Audit Committee and the Audit Committee’s financial expert is set forth under the caption “Corporate Governance Information” in this section.the 2010 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is posted on the Company’s internet website at www.fiiwarsaw.com. In addition, the Company will provide a copy of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to anyone, without charge, upon request addressed to Director of Human Resources at Financial Institutions, Inc., 220 Liberty Street, Warsaw, NY 14569. The Company intends to disclose any amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of its Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, and that relates to any element of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, by posting such information on the Company’s website.
ItemITEM 11. Executive CompensationEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
TheIn response to this Item, the information set forth in the 2010 Proxy Statement under the heading “Executive Compensation” is incorporated herein by reference to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for its 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days following the end of the Company’s fiscal year.reference.
ITEM 12.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
In response to this Item, 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Informationthe information set forth in the 2010 Proxy Statement under the heading “Stock Ownership” is incorporated herein by reference toreference. The information under the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for its 2007 Annual Meetingheading “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in Part II, Item 5 of Shareholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days following the end of the Company’s fiscal year.this Form 10-K is also incorporated herein by reference.
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2006, regarding the Company’s equity compensation plans.
             
      Weighted Average Number of Securities
  Number of Securities to be Exercise Price of Remaining Available for
  Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Future Issuance Under
  Outstanding Options, Options, Warrants Equity Compensation
Plan Category Warrants and Rights and Rights Plans
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Shareholders  498,932  $19.54   933,024 
             
Equity Compensation Plans not Approved by Shareholders         

92


ItemITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director IndependenceCERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
InformationIn response to this Item, the information set forth in the 2010 Proxy Statement under the headings “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” and “Corporate Governance Information” is incorporated herein by reference to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for its 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days following the end of the Company’s fiscal year.reference.
ItemITEM 14. Principal Accountant Fees and ServicesPRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
InformationIn response to this Item, the information set forth in the 2010 Proxy Statement under the headings “Audit Committee ReportReport” and “Independent Auditors” is incorporated herein by reference to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for its 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days following the end of the Company’s fiscal year.reference.

- 105 -


PART IV
ItemITEM 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement SchedulesEXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) List of Documents Filed as Part of this Report
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1)Financial Statements.
The financial statements listed below andReference is made to the Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements of Financial Condition asInstitutions, Inc. and Subsidiaries under Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in Part II of December 31, 2006 and 2005
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statementsthis Form 10-K.
(2)(b) Schedules.
EXHIBITS
All schedules are omitted since the required information is either not applicable, not required, or is contained in the respective financial statements or in the notes thereto.

93


(3)Exhibits.
The following is a list of all exhibits filed or incorporated by reference as part of this Report.
     
Exhibit No.
Number Description Location
 3.1 
3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-110-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, dated June 25, 1999 (File No. 333-76865) (The “S-1 Registration Statement”)March 12, 2009
     
3.2 Amended and Restated Bylaws dated May 23, 2001Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, dated March 11, 2002
3.3Amended and Restated Bylaws dated February 18, 2004Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, dated March 12, 2004
3.4Amended and Restated Bylaws dated February 22, 2006Company Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 of the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005,2008, dated March 15, 200612, 2009
     
4.1Warrant to Purchase Common Stock, dated December 23, 2008 issued by the Registrant to the United States Department of the TreasuryIncorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Form 8-K, dated December 19, 2008
10.1 1999 Management Stock Incentive Plan Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the S-1 Registration Statement
     
10.2 Amendment Number One to the FII 1999 Management Stock Incentive Plan Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K, dated July 28, 2006
     
10.3 Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement Pursuant to the FII 1999 Management Stock Incentive Plan Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Form 8-K, dated July 28, 2006
     
10.4 Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement Pursuant to the FII 1999 Management Stock Incentive Plan Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Form 8-K, dated July 28, 2006
     
10.5Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement Pursuant to the FII 1999 Management Stock Incentive PlanIncorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K, dated January 23, 2008
10.6 1999 Directors Stock Incentive Plan Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the S-1 Registration Statement
     
10.610.7 Amendment to the 1999 Director Stock Ownership Requirements (effective January 1, 2005)Incentive Plan Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.410.7 of the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004,2008, dated March 16, 200512, 2009
     
10.710.82009 Management Stock Incentive PlanIncorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009, dated August 5, 2009
10.92009 Directors’ Stock Incentive PlanIncorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009, dated August 5, 2009
10.10Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement Pursuant to the FII 2009 Management Stock Incentive PlanIncorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K, dated January 19, 2010
10.11Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement Pursuant to the FII 2009 Management Stock Incentive PlanIncorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K, dated March 1, 2010
10.12Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement Pursuant to the FII 2009 Management Stock Incentive PlanIncorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Form 8-K, dated March 1, 2010
10.13Amended Stock Ownership Requirements, dated December 14, 2005Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, dated March 15, 2006

- 106 -


Exhibit
NumberDescriptionLocation
10.14 Executive Agreement with Peter G. Humphrey Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K, dated June 30, 2005
     
10.810.15 Executive Agreement with James T. Rudgers Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Form 8-K, dated June 30, 2005
     
10.910.16 Executive Agreement with Ronald A. Miller Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Form 8-K, dated June 30, 2005
     
10.1010.17 Executive Agreement with Martin K. BirminghBirmingham am Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Form 8-K, dated June 30, 2005
     
10.1110.18 Agreement with Peter G. Humphrey Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Form 8-K, dated June 30, 2005
     
10.1210.19 Executive Agreement with John J. Witkowski Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Form 8-K, dated September 14, 2005
     
10.1310.20 Executive Agreement with George D. Hagi Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Form 8-K, dated February 2, 2006

94


     
Exhibit No.DescriptionLocation
10.21  
10.14Term and Revolving Credit Loan Agreements between FII and M&T Bank, dated December 15, 2003Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, dated March 12, 2004
10.15Second Amendment to Term Loan CreditVoluntary Retirement Agreement between FI and M&T Bank, dated September 30, 2005Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 of the Form10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005, dated November 4, 2005
10.16Fourth Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement between FII and M&T Bank, dated September 30, 2005Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 of the Form10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005, dated November 4, 2005
10.17Amended Stock Ownership Requirements, dated December 14, 2005Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of the Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, dated March 15, 2006
10.182006 Annual Incentive Plan, dated March 13, 2006Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 of the Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, dated March 15, 2006
10.19Executive Enhanced Incentive Plan dated January 25, 2006Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of the Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, dated March 15, 2006
10.20Trust Company Agreement and Plan of Mergerwith James T. Rudgers Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K, dated April 3, 2006September 24, 2008
     
10.2110.22 2007 Annual Incentive Plan, dated March 13, 2007Amendment to Voluntary Retirement Agreement with James T. Rudgers Filed HerewithIncorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K, dated July 1, 2009
     
10.2210.23 2007 Director (Non-Management) CompensationVoluntary Retirement Agreement with Ronald A. Miller Filed HerewithIncorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Form 8-K, dated September 24, 2008
     
10.24Amendment to Voluntary Retirement Agreement with Ronald A. MillerIncorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K, dated March 3, 2010
10.25Letter Agreement, dated December 23, 2008, including the Securities Purchase Agreement-Standard Terms attached thereto, by and between the Company and the United States Department of the TreasuryIncorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K, dated December 19, 2008
11.1 Statement of Computation of Per Share Earnings Incorporated by reference to Note 15 of the Registrant’s audited consolidated financial statements under Item 8 filed herewith.
     
12Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred DividendsFiled Herewith
21 Subsidiaries of Financial Institutions, Inc. Filed Herewith
     
23 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Filed Herewith
     
31.1 Certification of Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 -CEO— Principal Executive Officer Filed Herewith
     
31.2 Certification of Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 -CFO— Principal Financial Officer Filed Herewith
     
32.132 Certification of Annual Report on Form 10-Kpursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 -CEO Filed Herewith
     
32.299.1 Certification of Annual Report on Form 10-KChief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906111(b)(4) of the Sarbanes-OxleyEmergency Economic Stabilization ActFiled Herewith
99.2Certification of 2002 -CFOChief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 111(b)(4) of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act Filed Herewith

95

- 107 -


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act, of 1934, the Registrant has dulyregistrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
     
 FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC.
March 12, 2010 /s/ Peter G. Humphrey   
 
Date: March 13, 2007By:Peter G. Humphrey  
 President & Chief Executive Officer  
Peter G. Humphrey
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:Ronald A. Miller
Ronald A. Miller
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrantregistrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated have signed this report below.dates indicated.
     
Signatures Title Date
     
Erland E. Kailbourne/s/ Peter G. Humphrey
 
Erland E. KailbournePeter G. Humphrey
 Chairman of the Board of Directors Director, President and Chief Executive Officer 
(Principal Executive Officer)
 March 13, 200712, 2010
     
Peter G. Humphrey/s/ Karl F. Krebs
 
Peter G. HumphreyKarl F. Krebs
 Executive Vice President and Chief ExecutiveFinancial Officer
(Principal Financial and DirectorAccounting Officer)
 March 13, 200712, 2010
     
/s/ Karl V. Anderson, Jr.
 
Karl V. Anderson, Jr.
 Director  March 13, 200712, 2010
     
/s/ John E. Benjamin
 
John E. Benjamin
 Director  March 13, 200712, 2010
     
/s/ Thomas P. Connolly
 
Thomas P. Connolly
 Director  March 13, 200712, 2010
     
/s/ Barton P. Dambra
 
Barton P. Dambra
 Director  March 13, 200712, 2010
     
/s/ Samuel M. Gullo
 
Samuel M. Gullo
 Director  March 13, 200712, 2010
     
/s/ Susan R. Holliday
 
Susan R. Holliday
 Director  March 13, 200712, 2010
     
Joseph F. Hurley/s/ Erland E. Kailbourne
 
Joseph F. HurleyErland E. Kailbourne
 Director, Chairman  March 13, 200712, 2010
     
/s/ Robert N. Latella
 
Robert N. Latella
 Director  March 13, 200712, 2010
     
John R. Tyler, Jr./s/ James L. Robinson
 
John R. Tyler, Jr.James L. Robinson
 Director  March 13, 200712, 2010
     
/s/ James H. Wyckoff
 
James H. Wyckoff
 Director  March 13, 200712, 2010

96

- 108 -