Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K


ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (D)(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008

2010


Commission File No.: 001-16767


Westfield Financial, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Massachusetts

73-1627673

(State or other jurisdiction

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

of incorporation or organization)


Massachusetts73-1627673
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
141 Elm Street, Westfield, Massachusetts 01085

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)


(413) 568-1911

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Common Stock, $.01 par value per share

The NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC

(Title of each class)

(Name of each exchange on which registered)

Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share
The NASDAQ Global Select Market
(Title of each class)(Name of each exchange on which registered)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:    None.


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes [ ]o   No [X]

x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes [ ]o   No [X]

x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes [X]x   No [ ].

o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the proceeding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such filed).  Yes o   No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  [ ]

o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.

  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one):


Large accelerated filer [ ]o   Accelerated filer [X]x   Non-accelerated filer [ ]o   Smaller reporting company [ ]

o


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  Yes [ ]o   No [X].

x


The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2008,2010, was $284,017,851.$243,599,838.  This figureamount was based on the closing price as of June 30, 20082010 on The NASDAQ StockGlobal Select Market for a share of the registrant’s common stock, which was $9.05$8.33 on June 30, 2008.

2010.


As of March 6, 2009,4, 2011, the registrant had 31,218,96028,164,901 shares of common stock, $0.01 per value, issued and outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:


Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 20092010 Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders are incorporated by reference into Part II and Part III of this report.








WESTFIELD FINANCIAL, INC.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2008

2010


TABLE OF CONTENTS


ITEM

PART I

PAGE

 

 

 

1

BUSINESS

2

1A

RISK FACTORS

41

1B

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

45

2

PROPERTIES

46

3

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

47

4

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

47

 

 

 

 

PART II

 

 

 

 

5

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

48

6

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

51

7

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

53

7A

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

78

8

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

78

9

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

78

9A

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

78

9B

OTHER INFORMATION

79

 

 

 

 

PART III

 

 

 

 

10

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

80

11

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

80

12

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

80

13

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

80

14

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

80

 

 

 

 

PART IV

 

 

 

 

15

EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

81

 

 

 

 

SIGNATURES

 






ITEMPAGE
    
2 
25 
28 
29 
30 
30 
    
   
    
31 
34 
36 
51 
51 
51 
51 
52 
   
    
53 
53 
53 
53 
53 
    
   
    
54 

FORWARD - LOOKING STATEMENTS


We may, from time to time, make written or oral “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including statements contained in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), our reports to shareholders and in other communications by us. This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” which may be identified by the use of such words as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “estimated,” and “potential.”  Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to our financial condition, results of operation and business that are subject to various factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from these estimates.  These factors include, but are not limited to:


changes in the real estate market or local economy;


changes in interest rates;


changes in laws and regulations to which we are subject; and


competition in our primary market area.


●  changes in the real estate market or local economy;
●  changes in interest rates;
●  changes in laws and regulations to which we are subject; and
●  competition in our primary market area.
Any or all of our forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and in any other public statements we make may turn out to be wrong.  They can be affected by inaccurate assumptions we might make or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties.  Consequently, no forward-looking statements can be guaranteed.  We disclaim any obligation to subsequently revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements, or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.




Unless the context indicates otherwise, all references in this prospectus to “Westfield Financial,” “we,” “us,” “our company,” “corporation” and “our” refer to Westfield Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries (including the Bank, Elm Street Securities Corporation, WFD Securities, Inc. and WB Real Estate Holdings, LLC).  References to the “Bank” are to Westfield Bank, our wholly owned bank subsidiary.
1



PART I


ITEM 1.

BUSINESS


BUSINESS
General.  Westfield Financial is a Massachusetts-chartered stock holding company and the parent company of Westfield Bank (the “Bank”).  Westfield Financial was formed in 2001 in connection with its reorganization from a federally-chartered mutual holding company to a Massachusetts-chartered stock holding company with the second step conversion being completed in 2007.  The Bank was formed in 1853 and reorganized into a mutual holding company structure without a stock offering in 1995. In July 2004, Westfield Bank converted from a Massachusetts-chartered savings bank tois a federally-chartered savings bank regulated by the Office of Thrift Supervision.  Westfield Financial, Inc. (“Westfield Financial”) was organized asAs a Massachusetts-chartered stock holding company in November 2001 in connection with the reorganization of Westfield Mutual Holding Company, a federally-chartered mutual holding company. As part of the reorganization, Westfield Financial offered for sale 47% of its common stock. The remaining 53% of Westfield Financial’s shares were issued to Westfield Mutual Holding Company. The reorganization and related stock offering were completed on December 27, 2001.


On January 3, 2007, Westfield Financial completed its stock offering in connection with the second step conversion of Westfield Mutual Holding Company. As part of the conversion, New Westfield Financial, Inc. succeeded Westfield Financial as the stock holding company of Westfield Bank, and Westfield Mutual Holding Company was dissolved. In the stock offering, a total of 18,400,000 shares representing Westfield Mutual Holding Company’s ownership interest in Westfield Financial were sold by New Westfield Financial in a subscription offering, community offering and syndicated offering. In addition, each outstanding share of Westfield Financial as of January 3, 2007 was exchanged for 3.28138 new shares of New Westfield Financial common stock. New Westfield Financial, Inc. changed its name to Westfield Financial, Inc. effective January 3, 2007.


Historically, Westfield Bank has been a community-oriented provider of banking products and services to businesses and individuals, including traditional products such as residential and commercial real estate loans, consumer loans and a variety of deposit products. In recent years, however, Westfield Bank has developed and implemented a lending strategy that focuses less on residential real estate lending and morebank, we focus on servicing commercial customers, including increased emphasis on commercial and industrial lending and commercial deposit relationships, extending its branch network and broadening its product lines and services. Westfield Bank believesrelationships.  We believe that this business strategyfocus is best for itsour long term success and viability, and complements itsour existing commitment to high quality customer service.


Westfield Bank refers substantially all of the originations of its residential real estate loans to a third party mortgage company. Residential real estate borrowers submit applications to Westfield Bank, but the loan is approved by and closed on the books of the mortgage company. The third party mortgage company owns the servicing rights and services the loans. Westfield Bank retains no residual ownership interest in these loans. Westfield Bank receives a fee for each of the loans originated by the third party mortgage company. Westfield Bank may purchase residential real estate loans from the third party mortgage company depending on market conditions. To date, Westfield Bank has not purchased a significant amount of loans from the third party mortgage company.




2


Westfield Bank’s revenues are derived principally from interest on its loans and interest and dividends on its investment securities. Its primary sources of funds are deposits, short-term borrowings, long-term debt, scheduled amortization and prepayments of loan principal and mortgage-backed securities, maturities and calls of investment securities, and funds provided by operations.


Elm Street Securities Corporation, a Massachusetts-chartered corporation, was formed by Westfield Financialus for the primary purpose of holding qualified investment securities.  In February 2007, Westfield Financial alsowe formed WFD Securities, Inc., a Massachusetts-chartered corporation, for the primary purpose of holding qualified investment securities.


Unless  In October 2009, we formed WB Real Estate Holdings, LLC, a Massachusetts-chartered limited liability company, for the context otherwise requires, all references in this document to Westfield Financial or Westfield Bank include Westfield Financial, Westfield Bank, Elm Street Securities Corporation and WFD Securities, Inc. on a consolidated basis.


primary purpose of holding real property acquired as security for debts previously contracted by the Bank.

Market Area. Westfield Bank operates through  We operate 11 banking offices in Agawam, East Longmeadow, Holyoke, Southwick, Springfield, West Springfield and Westfield, Massachusetts. ItWe also has sixhave twelve free-standing ATM locations in Agawam, Feeding Hills, Holyoke, Springfield, West Springfield and Westfield, Massachusetts.  Westfield Bank’sOur primary deposit gathering area is concentrated in the communities surrounding these locations and itsour primary lending area includes all of Hampden County in western Massachusetts.  In addition, Westfield Bank provideswe provide online banking services through itsour website located atwww.westfieldbank.com.


The markets served by Westfield Bank’sour branches are primarily suburban in character, as Westfield Bank operateswe operate only two officesone office in Springfield, the Pioneer Valley’s primary urban market.  Westfield, Massachusetts, is located in the Pioneer Valley near the intersection of U.S. Interstates 90 (the Massachusetts Turnpike) and 91. Interstate 90 is the major east-west highway that crosses Massachusetts. Interstate 91 is the major north-south highway that runs directly through the heart of New England. The Pioneer Valley of western Massachusetts encompasses the fourth largest metropolitan area in New England.  The Springfield Metropolitan area covers a relatively diverse area ranging from densely populated urban areas, such as Springfield, to outlying rural areas. Westfield is located approximately 90 miles west of Boston, Massachusetts, 70 miles southeast of Albany, New York and 30 miles north of Hartford, Connecticut. The populati on estimates for Westfield, Springfield and Hampden County were 40,160, 149,938 and 457,908, respectively, in 2007.


The economy of Westfield Bank’s market area historically has been supported by a variety of industries. Its primary market area has benefited from the presence of large employers centered in insurance, health care, warehousing, manufacturing and education. Among the largest employers currently in its market area are Bay State Health Systems, Big Y Foods, Friendly Ice Cream Corporation, Mass Mutual Life Insurance Company, Mestek, Noble Hospital, the University of Massachusetts, Westfield State College, American International College, and the Sullivan Paper Company. In addition, other employment and economic activity is provided by a substantial number of small and medium size businesses in the area.




3


Westfield Bank’s future growth opportunities will be influenced by the growth and stability of the statewide and regional economies, other demographic population trends and the competitive environment. Westfield Bank believes that it has developed lending products and marketing strategies to address the diverse credit-related needs of the residents in its market area.


Median household and per capita income levels in Hampden County are below the state average, which is dominated by relatively high income levels prevailing in the populous Boston metropolitan area. Similarly, the median household and per capita income levels in Westfield Bank’s markets more closely approximate but also fall below the national averages.


As of December 2008, the unemployment rate of Hampden County and Massachusetts was 7.2% and 6.9%, respectively, compared to 4.6% and 4.5%, respectively, in December 2007.


Competition.Westfield Bank faces  We face intense competition both in making loans and attracting deposits.  ItsOur primary market area is highly competitive and it faceswe face direct competition from approximately 1921 financial institutions, many with a local, state-wide or regional presence and, in some cases, a national presence.  Many of these financial institutions are significantly larger than us and have greater financial resources than Westfield Bank. Westfield Bank’sresources. Our competition for loans comes principally from commercial banks, savings institutions, mortgage banking firms, credit unions, finance companies, mutual funds, insurance companies and brokerage and investment banking firms.  Historically, Westfield Bank’sour most direct competition for deposits has come from savings and commercial banks. Westfield Bank facesWe face additional competition for deposits from internet-based institutions, credit unions, brokerage firms and insurance companies.


Lending Activities


Loan Portfolio Composition.Westfield Bank’s Our loan portfolio primarily consists of commercial and industrialreal estate loans, commercial real estateand industrial loans, residential real estate loans, home equity loans, and consumer loans.


At December 31, 2008, Westfield Bank2010, we had total loans of $480.3$508.6 million, of which 65.4%71.8% were adjustable rate loans and 34.6 %28.2% were fixed rate loans.  Commercial real estate loans and commercial and industrial loans totaled $223.9$221.6 million and $153.9,$135.3 million, respectively.  The remainder of itsour loans at December 31, 20082010 consisted of residential real estate loans, home equity loans and consumer loans.  Residential real estate and home equity loans outstanding at December 31, 20082010 totaled $98.4$148.8 million.  Consumer loans outstanding at December 31, 20082010 were $4.2$2.9 million.


The interest rates Westfield Bank chargeswe charge on loans are affected principally by the demand for loans, the supply of money available for lending purposes and the interest rates offered by itsour competitors.  These factors are, in turn, affected by general and local economic conditions, monetary policies of the federal government, including the Federal Reserve Board, legislative tax policies and governmental budgetary matters.  The following table presents the composition of Westfield Bank’sour loan portfolio in dollar amounts and in percentages of the total portfolio at the dates indicated.



4



 

At December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

Amount

 

Percent of
Total

 

Amount

 

Percent of
Total

 

Amount

 

Percent of
Total

 

Amount

 

Percent of
Total

 

Amount

 

Percent of
Total

 

(Dollars in thousands)

Real estate loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Commercial

$223,857 

 

46.61

%

 

$189,964 

 

45.22

%

 

$174,556 

 

44.74

%

 

$169,564 

 

44.17

%

 

$144,336 

 

38.65

%

    Residential

62,810 

 

13.08

 

 

72,170 

 

17.18

 

 

79,308 

 

20.33

 

 

82,279 

 

21.43

 

 

101,098 

 

27.07

 

    Home equity

35,562 

 

7.40

 

 

35,940 

 

8.56

 

 

30,232 

 

7.75

 

 

24,639 

 

6.42

 

 

21,724 

 

5.82

 

        Total real estate loans

322,229 

 

67.09

 

 

298,074 

 

70.96

 

 

284,096 

 

72.82

 

 

276,482 

 

72.02

 

 

267,158 

 

71.54

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Commercial and industrial

153,861 

 

32.03

 

 

116,514 

 

27.74

 

 

100,237 

 

25.69

 

 

100,019 

 

26.06

 

 

94,726 

 

25.36

 

    Consumer, other

4,248 

 

0.88

 

 

5,479 

 

1.30

 

 

5,841 

 

1.49

 

 

7,372 

 

1.92

 

 

11,565 

 

3.10

 

        Total other loans

158,109 

 

32.91

 

 

121,993 

 

29.04

 

 

106,078 

 

27.18

 

 

107,391 

 

27.98

 

 

106,291 

 

28.46

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

        Total loans

480,338 

 

100.00

%

 

420,067 

 

100.00

%

 

390,174 

 

100.00

%

 

383,873 

 

100.00

%

 

373,449 

 

100.00

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unearned premiums and net deferred
  loan fees and costs, net

593 

 

 

 

 

561 

 

 

 

 

447 

 

 

 

 

386 

 

 

 

 

429 

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses

(8,796)

 

 

 

 

(5,726)

 

 

 

 

(5,437)

 

 

 

 

(5,422)

 

 

 

 

(5,277)

 

 

 

        Total loans, net

$472,135 

 

 

 

 

$414,902 

 

 

 

 

$385,184 

 

 

 

 

$378,837 

 

 

 

 

$368,601 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




5


2

  At December 31, 
  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006 
     Percent of     Percent of     Percent of     Percent of     Percent of 
  Amount  Total  Amount  Total  Amount  Total  Amount  Total  Amount  Total 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
Real estate loans:                              
Commercial $221,578   43.57% $229,061   48.08% $223,857   46.61% $189,964   45.22% $174,556   44.74%
Residential  112,680   22.17   64,299   13.50   62,810   13.08   72,170   17.18   79,308   20.33 
Home equity  36,116   7.09   34,755   7.29   35,562   7.40   35,940   8.56   30,232   7.75 
Total real estate loans  370,374   72.83   328,115   68.87   322,229   67.09   298,074   70.96   284,096   72.82 
                                         
Other loans                                        
Commercial and industrial  135,250   26.59   145,012   30.44   153,861   32.03   116,514   27.74   100,237   25.69 
Consumer, other  2,960   0.58   3,307   0.69   4,248   0.88   5,479   1.30   5,841   1.49 
Total other loans  138,210   27.17   148,319   31.13   158,109   32.91   121,993   29.04   106,078   27.18 
                                         
Total loans  508,584   100.00%  476,434   100.00%  480,338   100.00%  420,067   100.00%  390,174   100.00%
                                         
Unearned premiums and net deferred                                        
loan fees and costs, net  742       360       593       561       447     
Allowance for loan losses  (6,934)      (7,645)      (8,796)      (5,726)      (5,437)    
Total loans, net $502,392      $469,149      $472,135      $414,902      $385,184     
                                         
3


Loan Maturity and Repricing.  The following table shows the repricing dates or contractual maturity dates as of December 31, 2008.2010.  The table does not reflect prepayments or scheduled principal amortization.  Demand loans, loans having no stated maturity, and overdrafts are shown as due in within one year.


 

At December 31, 2008

 

Residential
Real Estate
Loans

 

Home Equity
Loans

 

Commercial
Real Estate
Loans

 

Commercial
and Industrial
Loans

 

Consumer
Loans

 

Totals

 

(In thousands)

Amount due:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Within one year

$       21,902 

 

$       11,517 

 

$       37,529 

 

$       81,324 

 

$        839 

 

$153,111 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

After one year:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

        One to three years

8,942 

 

825 

 

56,151 

 

12,790 

 

1,565 

 

80,273 

        Three to five years

2,223 

 

1,694 

 

83,112 

 

50,175 

 

1,588 

 

138,792 

        Five to ten years

5,449 

 

8,700 

 

42,063 

 

9,572 

 

14 

 

65,798 

        Ten to twenty years

6,748 

 

12,826 

 

4,277 

 

 

 

23,851 

        Over twenty years

17,546 

 

 

725 

 

 

242 

 

18,513 

Total due after one year

40,908 

 

24,045 

 

186,328 

 

72,537 

 

3,409 

 

327,227 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total amount due:

62,810 

 

35,562 

 

223,857 

 

153,861 

 

4,248 

 

480,338 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unearned premiums and
    deferred loan fees and
    costs, net

84 

 

294 

 

 

206 

 

 

593 

Allowance for loan losses

(295)

 

(167)

 

(2,216)

 

(6,062)

 

(56)

 

(8,796)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans, net

$       62,599 

 

$       35,689 

 

$     221,642 

 

$     148,005 

 

$      4,200 

 

$472,135 




6

  At December 31, 2010 
  Residential     Commercial  Commercial       
  Real Estate  Home Equity  Real Estate  and Industrial  Consumer    
  Loans  Loans  Loans  Loans  Loans  Totals 
  (In thousands) 
Amount due:                  
Within one year $14,806  $18,050  $21,929  $76,355  $639  $131,779 
                         
After one year:                        
                         
One to three years  3,062   437   51,961   30,025   916   86,401 
Three to five years  722   1,604   114,873   19,872   980   138,051 
Five to ten years  5,812   7,605   13,617   4,429   -   31,463 
Ten to twenty years  33,752   8,420   15,354   -   -   57,526 
Over twenty years  54,526   -   3,844   4,569   425   63,364 
Total due after one year  97,874   18,066   199,649   58,895   2,321   376,805 
                         
Total amount due:  112,680   36,116   221,578   135,250   2,960   508,584 
                         
                         
Net deferred loan origination
costs
  314   297   (150)  275   6   742 
Allowance for loan losses  (664)  (213)  (3,182)  (2,849)  (26)  (6,934)
                         
Loans, net $112,330  $36,200  $218,246  $132,676  $2,940  $502,392 


The following table presents, as of December 31, 2008,2010, the dollar amount of all loans contractually due or scheduled to reprice after December 31, 20092011, and whether such loans have fixed interest rates or adjustable interest rates.

  Due After December 31, 2011 
  Fixed  Adjustable  Total 
  (In thousands) 
Real estate loans:         
Residential $94,470  $3,404  $97,874 
Home equity  18,066   -   18,066 
Commercial real estate  48,500   151,149   199,649 
Total real estate loans  161,036   154,553   315,589 
             
Other loans:            
Commercial and industrial  46,892   12,003   58,895 
Consumer  2,321   -   2,321 
Total other loans  49,213   12,003   61,216 
             
Total loans $210,249  $166,556  $376,805 

 

Due After December 31, 2009

 

Fixed

 

Adjustable

 

Total

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate loans:

 

 

 

 

 

    Residential

$     32,846

 

$        8,062

 

$      40,908

    Home Equity

24,045

 

-

 

24,045

    Commercial real estate

33,523

 

152,805

 

186,328

    Totat real estate loans

90,414

 

160,867

 

251,281

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other loans:

 

 

 

 

 

    Commercial and Industrial

58,260

 

14,277

 

72,537

    Consumer

3,409

 

-

 

3,409

    Total other loans

61,669

 

14,277

 

75,946

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total loans

$    152,083

 

$    175,144

 

$    327,227

 

 

 

 

 

 




7


4

The following table presents our loan originations, purchases sales and principal payments for the years indicated:

  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2010  2009  2008 
  (In thousands) 
Loans:         
Balance outstanding at beginning of year $476,434  $480,338  $420,067 
             
Originations:            
Real estate loans:            
Residential  1,830   1,378   2,807 
Home equity  13,167   16,601   12,120 
Commercial  19,174   39,805   40,367 
              Total mortgage originations  34,171   57,784   55,294 
             
     Commercial and industrial loans  41,029   47,492   84,300 
     Consumer loans  1,550   1,299   1,624 
                 Total originations  76,750   106,575   141,218 
     Purchase of one-to-four family mortgage loans  61,880   16,381   1,648 
   138,630   122,956   142,866 
             
Less:            
Principal repayments, unadvanced funds and other, net  96,846   121,809   82,212 
Loan charge-offs, net  9,634   5,051   383 
Total deductions  106,480   126,860   82,595 
Ending balance $508,584  $476,434  $480,338 

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

(In thousands)

Loans:

 

 

 

 

 

    Balance outstanding at beginning of year

$    420,067

 

$    390,174

 

$    383,873

 

 

 

 

 

 

Originations:

 

 

 

 

 

    Real estate loans:

 

 

 

 

 

        Residential

2,807

 

3,692

 

4,337

        Home Equity

12,120

 

17,158

 

15,336

        Commericial

40,367

 

44,811

 

52,807

            Total mortgage originations

55,294

 

65,661

 

72,480

 

 

 

 

 

 

        Commercial and industrial loans

84,300

 

59,812

 

34,864

        Consumer loans

1,624

 

3,161

 

3,657

            Total originations

141,218

 

128,634

 

111,001

        Purchase of one-to-four family mortgage loans

1,648

 

1,759

 

11,845

 

142,866

 

130,393

 

122,846

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less:

 

 

 

 

 

    Principal repayments, unadvanced funds and
      other, net

 

 

 

 

 

82,212

 

100,389

 

116,170

    Loan charge-offs, net

383

 

111

 

375

        Total deductions

82,595

 

100,500

 

116,545

    Ending balance

$    480,338

 

$    420,067

 

$    390,174


Commercial and Industrial Loans. Westfield Bank offers  We offer commercial and industrial loan products and services which are designed to give business owners borrowing opportunities for modernization, inventory, equipment, construction, consolidation, real estate, working capital, vehicle purchases and the financing of existing corporate debt.  Westfield Bank offersWe offer business installment loans, vehicle and equipment financing, lines of credit, equipment leasing and other commercial loans.  At December 31, 2008, Westfield Bank’s2010, our commercial and industrial loan portfolio consisted of 877986 loans, totaling $153.9$135.3 million or 32.0%26.6 % of itsour total loans.  Since 2004,2006, commercial and industrial loans have grown $59.2$35.1 million, or 62.5 %,35.0%, from $94.7$100.2 million at December 31, 20042006 to $153.9$135.3 million at December 31, 2008. Westfield Bank’s2010.  Our commercial loan team includes sevennine commercial loan officers, one business development manager, four cred itfive credit analysts and twoone portfolio managers. Westfield Bankmanager.  We may hire additional commercial loan officers on an as needed basis.




8


As part of Westfield Bank’sour strategy of increasing itsour emphasis on commercial lending, Westfield Bank seekswe seek to attract itsour business customers’ entire banking relationship.  Most commercial borrowers also maintain commercial deposits at Westfield Bank. Westfield Bank providesdeposits.  We provide complementary commercial products and services, a variety of commercial deposit accounts, cash management services, internet banking, sweep accounts, a broad ATM network and night deposit services.  Westfield Bank offersWe offer a remote deposit capture product whereby commercial customers can receive credit for check deposits by electronically transmitting check images from their own locations.  Commercial loan officers are based in itsour main and branch offices, and Westfield Bank views itswe view our potential branch expansion as a means of facilitating these commercial relationships.  Westfield Bank intendsWe intend to continue to expand the volume of its com mercialour commercial business products and services within itsour current underwriting standards.


Westfield Bank’s

5

Our commercial and industrial loan portfolio does not have any significant loan concentration by type of property or borrower. The largest concentration of loans was for manufacturing, which comprisecomprises approximately 5.84%5.32% of the total loan portfolio as of December 31, 2008.2010. At December 31, 2008, Westfield Bank’s2010, our largest commercial and industrial loan relationship was $19.8$24.8 million to a private New England college. The loan relationship is secured by business assets and financial instruments.  The loans ofto this borrower have performed to contractual terms.


Commercial and industrial loans generally have terms of seven years or less, however, on an occasional basis, may have terms of up to ten years.  Among the $153.9$135.3 million Westfield Bank haswe have in itsour commercial and industrial loan portfolio as of December 31, 2008, $84.32010, $81.7 million have adjustable interest rates and $69.6$53.6 million have fixed interest rates.  Whenever possible, Westfield Bank seekswe seek to originate adjustable rate commercial and industrial loans.  Borrower activity and market conditions, however, may influence whether Westfield Bank iswe are able to originate adjustable rate loans rather than fixed rate loans.  Westfield BankWe generally requiresrequire the personal guarantee of the business owner.  Interest rates on commercial and industrial loans generally have higher yields than residential or commercial real estate loans.


Commercial and industrial loans are generally considered to involve a higher degree of risk than residential or commercial real estate loans because the collateral may be in the form of intangible assets and/or inventory subject to market obsolescence.  Please see “Risk Factors –Our loan portfolio includes loans with a higher risk of loss.”  Commercial and industrial loans may also involve relatively large loan balances to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers, with the repayment of such loans typically dependent on the successful operation and income stream of the borrower.  These risks can be significantly affected by economic conditions.  In addition, business lending generally requires substantially greater oversight efforts by Westfield Bank’sour staff compared to residential or commercial real estate lending.  In order to mitigate this risk, Westfield Bank monitors itswe monitor our loan concentration and i tsour loan policies generally to limit the amount of loans to a single borrower or group of borrowers.  Westfield BankWe also utilizesutilize the services of an outside consultant to conduct credit quality reviews of the commercial and industrial loan portfolio.




9


Commercial Real Estate Loans. Westfield Bank originates  We originate commercial real estate loans to finance the purchase of real property, which generally consists of apartment buildings, business properties, multi-family investment properties and construction loans to developers of commercial and residential properties.  In underwriting commercial real estate loans, consideration is given to the property’s historic cash flow, current and projected occupancy, location and physical condition.  At December 31, 2008, Westfield Bank’s2010, our commercial real estate loan portfolio consisted of 408393 loans, totaling $223.9$221.6 million, or 46.6%43.6 %, of total loans.  Since 2004,2006, commercial real estate loans have grown by $79.6$47.0 million, or 55.2%,26.9 %, from $144.3$174.6 million at December 31, 20042006 to $223.9$221.6 million at December 31, 2008.

2010.


The majority of the commercial real estate portfolio consists of loans which are collateralized by properties in the Pioneer Valley of Massachusetts and northern Connecticut.  Westfield Bank’sOur commercial real estate loan portfolio is diverse, and does not have any significant loan concentration by type of property or borrower.  Westfield BankWe generally lendslend up to a loan-to-value ratio of 80%75% on commercial properties, Westfield Bank,properties. We, however, will lend up to a maximum of 85% loan-to-value ratio but will generally requiresrequire a minimum debt coverage ratio of 1.15 times. Its1.15.  Our largest non-owner occupied commercial real estate loan relationship had an outstanding balance of $20.1$11.7 million at December 31, 20082010, which wasis secured by one commercial investment property located in Massachusetts, and one commercial investment property located in Rhode Island.  The loans of this borrower have performed to contractual terms.


Westfield Bank

We also offersoffer construction loans to finance the construction of commercial properties located in itsour primary market area.  At December 31, 2008, Westfield Bank2010, we had $14.9 million$309,000 in commercial construction loans and commitments that are committed to refinance into permanent mortgages at the end of the construction period. Westfield Bank had $13.9period and $4.0 million in commercial construction loans and commitments at December 31, 2008 that are not committed to permanent financing at the end of the construction period.


Commercial real estate lending involves additional risks compared with one-to-four family residential lending.  Payments on loans secured by commercial real estate properties often depend on the successful management of the properties, on the amount of rent from the properties, or on the level of expenses needed to maintain the properties.  Repayment of such loans may therefore be adversely affected by conditions in the real estate market or the general economy.  Also, commercial real estate loans typically involve large loan balances to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers.  In order to mitigate this risk, Westfield Bank monitors itswe monitor our loan concentration risk on a quarterly basis and itsour loan policies generally limit the amount of loans to a single borrower or group of borrowers.


6


Because of increased risks associated with commercial real estate loans, Westfield Bank’sour commercial real estate loans generally have higher rates than residential real estate loans.  Please see“RiskFactors – Our loan portfolio includes loans with a higher risk of loss.”  Commercial real estate loans generally have adjustable rates with repricing dates of five years or less; however, occasionally repricing dates may be as long as ten years.  Whenever possible, Westfield Bank seekswe seek to originate adjustable rate commercial real estate loans.  Borrower activity and market conditions, however, may influence whether Westfield Bank iswe are able to originate adjustable rate loans rather than fixed rate loans.



10


Residential Real Estate Loans and Originations. Westfield Bank refers  We process substantially all of theour originations of its residential real estate loans tothrough a third partythird-party mortgage company.  Residential real estate borrowers submit applications to Westfield Bank,us, but the loan is approved by and closed on the books of the mortgage company.  The third partythird-party mortgage company owns the servicing rights and services the loans.  Westfield Bank retainsWe retain no residual ownership interest in these loans.  Westfield Bank receivesWe receive a fee for each of these loans originated by the third partythird-party mortgage company.


Even though substantially all residential real estate loan originations are referred to a third partythird-party mortgage company, Westfield Bankwe still holdshold residential real estate loans in itsour loan portfolio.  The loans consist primarily of loans originated by Westfield Bank,us prior to the commencement of the third partythird-party residential mortgage referral program in September 2001, or are loans purchased by Westfield Bank. Westfield Bankwe purchased.  We occasionally purchasespurchase adjustable rate mortgages, which are serviced by the originating institutions, from other banks located in Massachusetts.  At December 31, 2008,2010, loans on one-to-four family residential properties, including home equity lines, accounted for $98.4$148.8 million, or 20.5%29.3%, of Westfield Bank’sour total loan portfolio.


Westfield Bank’s

Our residential adjustable rate mortgage loans generally are fully amortizing loans with contractual maturities of up to 30 years, payments due monthly.  ItsOur adjustable rate mortgage loans generally provide for specified minimum and maximum interest rates, with a lifetime cap and floor, and a periodic adjustment on the interest rate over the rate in effect on the date of origination.  As a consequence of using caps, the interest rates on these loans are not generally as rate sensitive as itsour cost of funds.  The adjustable rate mortgage loans that Westfield Bank originateswe originate generally are not convertible into fixed rate loans.


Adjustable rate mortgage loans generally pose different credit risks than fixed rate loans, primarily because as interest rates rise, the borrower’s payments rise, increasing the potential for default.  To date, Westfield Bank haswe have not experienced difficulty with payments for these loans.  At December 31, 2008, its2010, our residential real estate and home equity loan portfolio included $41.4$35.9 million in adjustable rate loans, or 8.6%7.1%, of itsour total loan portfolio, and $57.0$112.9 million in fixed rate loans, or 11.9%22.2%, of itsour total loan portfolio.


Westfield Bank’s

Our home equity loans totaled $35.6$36.1 million, or 7.4%7.1%, of total loans at December 31, 2008.2010.  Home equity loans include $24.1$18.1 million in fixed rate loans, or 5.0%3.6%, of total loans, and $11.5$18.0 million in adjustable rate loans, or 2.4%3.5%, of total loans.  These loans may be originated in amounts of the existing first mortgage, or up to 80% of the value of the property securing the loan.  The term to maturity on Westfield Bank’sour home equity and home improvement loans may be up to 15 years.


Consumer Loans.  Consumer loans are generally originated at higher interest rates than residential and commercial real estate loans, but they also generally tend to have a higher credit risk than residential real estate loans because they are usually unsecured or secured by rapidly depreciable assets. Management, however, believes that offering consumer loan products helps to expand and create stronger ties to Westfield Bank’sour existing customer base by increasing the number of customer relationships and providing cross-marketing opportunities.




11


Westfield Bank offers

We offer a variety of consumer loans to retail customers in the communities it serves.we serve.  Examples of itsour consumer loans include automobile loans, secured passbook loans, credit lines tied to deposit accounts to provide overdraft protection, and unsecured personal loans.  At December 31, 2008,2010, the consumer loan portfolio totaled $4.2$2.9 million, or 0.9%0.6%, of total loans.  Westfield Bank’sOur consumer lending will allow itus to diversify itsour loan portfolio while continuing to meet the needs of the individuals and businesses that it serves.

we serve.


Loans collateralized by rapidly depreciable assets such as automobiles or that are unsecured entail greater risks than residential real estate loans.  In such cases, repossessed collateral for a defaulted loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance, since there is a greater likelihood of damage, loss or depreciation of the underlying collateral.  The remaining deficiency often does not warrant further substantial collection efforts against the borrower beyond obtaining a deficiency judgment.  Further, collections on these loans
7

are dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial stability and, therefore, are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy.  There was no repossessed collateral relating to consumer loans at December 31, 2008.2010.  Finally, the application of various federal and state laws, including federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount which can be recovered on such loans if a borrower defaults.


Loan Approval Procedures and Authority.Individuals authorized to make loans on our behalf of Westfield Bank are designated by Westfield Bank’sour Senior Lending Officer and approved by the Board of Directors.  Each loan officer has loan approval authority up to prescribed limits that depend upon the officer’s level of experience.


Upon receipt of a completed loan application from a prospective borrower, Westfield Bank orderswe order a credit report and verifiesverify other information.  If necessary, Westfield Bank obtainswe obtain additional financial or credit related information.  Westfield BankWe also requiresrequire an appraisal for all commercial real estate loans greater than $250,000, which is performed by licensed or certified third partythird-party appraisal firms and reviewed by Westfield Bank’sour lending department.

Appraisals for home equity loans are required for loans in excess of $250,000;$100,000; otherwise, a designated employee of Westfield Bank conducts an inspection of the property.  Westfield Bank requiresWe require title insurance on most commercial real estate loans.  Westfield BankWe also requiresrequire borrowers to obtain flood insurance, if applicable, prior to closing, for all loans secured by real estate within a designated flood zone.


Commercial and Industrial Loans and Commercial Real Estate Loans. Westfield Bank lends  We lend up to a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 85% on commercial properties and the majority of these loans require a minimum debt coverage ratio of 1.15.  Commercial real estate lending involves additional risks compared with one- to four-familyone-to-four-family residential lending.  Because payments on loans secured by commercial real estate properties are often dependent on the successful operation or management of the properties, and/or the collateral value of the commercial real estate securing the loan, repayment of such loans may be subject, to a greater extent, to adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy.  Also, commercial real estate loans typically involve large loan balances to single borrowers or groups orof related borrowers.  Westfield Bank’sOur loan policies limit the amounts of loans to a single borrower or group of borrowers to r educereduce this risk.



12


Westfield Bank’s

Our lending policies permit itsour underwriting department to review and approve commercial and industrial loans and commercial real estate loans up to $1$1.0 million.  Any commercial and industrial or commercial real estate loan application that exceeds $1$1.0 million or that would result in the borrower’s total credit exposure with Westfield Bankus to exceed $1$1.0 million, or whose approval requires an exception to Westfield Bank’sour standard loan approval procedures, requires approval of the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors.  An example of an exception to Westfield Bank’sour standard loan approval procedures would be if a borrower was located outside Westfield Bank’sour primary lending area.  For loans requiring Board approval, management is responsible for presenting to the Board information about the creditworthiness of a borrower and the estimated value of the subject equipment or property.  Generally, these determinations are based on financial statements, corporate and personal tax returns, as well as any other necessary information, including real estate and or equipment appraisals.


Home Equity Loans. Home  We originate and fund our home equity loans are originated and funded by Westfield Bank.loans.  These loans may be originated in amounts of the existing first mortgage, or up to 80% of the value of the property securing the loan.  Westfield Bank’sOur underwriting department may approve home equity loans up to $200,000.  Home equity loans in amounts greater than $200,000 and up to $350,000 may be approved by certain officers of Westfield Bank who have been approved by the Board of Directors.  Home equity loans over $350,000, or whose approval requires an exception to Westfield Bank’sour standard loan approval procedures, are reviewed and approved by the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors.


Asset Quality


One of Westfield Bank’sour key operating objectives has been and continues to be the achievement of a high level of asset quality.  Westfield Bank maintainsWe maintain a large proportion of loans secured by residential and commercial properties, setsset sound credit standards for new loan originations and followsfollow careful loan administration procedures.  Westfield BankWe also utilizesutilize the services of an outside consultant to conduct credit quality reviews of Westfield Bank’sour commercial and industrial and commercial real estate loan portfolio on a semi-annualat least an annual basis.




13


8

Nonaccrual Loans and Foreclosed Assets. Westfield Bank’s  Our policies require that management continuously monitor the status of the loan portfolio and report to the Board of Directors on a monthly basis.  These reports include information on nonaccrual loans and foreclosed real estate, as well as Westfield Bank’sour actions and plans to cure the nonaccrual status of the loans and to dispose of the foreclosed property.


The following table presents information regarding nonperforming mortgage, consumer and other loans, and foreclosed real estate as of the dates indicated.  All loans where the interest payment is 90 days or more in arrears as of the closing date of each month are placed on non-accrual status.  At December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, 2007, and 2006, Westfield Bankwe had $8.8$3.2 million, $1.2$5.5 million, and $1.0$8.8 million, respectively, of nonaccrual loans.  If all nonaccrual loans had been performing in accordance with their terms, Westfield Bankwe would have earned additional interest income of $200,000, $65,000,$159,000   $94,000, and $67,000$200,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.

  Included in nonperforming loans at December 31, 2010 is one loan in the amount of $125,000 which was modified in a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”).  We had no TDR’s at December 31, 2009 or 2008.


 

At December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

(Dollars in thousands)

Nonaccrual real estate loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Residential

$       905

 

 

$       820

 

 

$       803

 

 

$       321

 

 

$       492

 

    Home equity

239

 

 

175

 

 

103

 

 

108

 

 

139

 

    Commercial real estate

1,460

 

 

177

 

 

69

 

 

1,285

 

 

1,341

 

Total nonaccrual real estate loans

2,604

 

 

1,172

 

 

975

 

 

1,714

 

 

1,972

 

Other loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Commercial and industrial

6,195

 

 

19

 

 

44

 

 

173

 

 

170

 

    Consumer

6

 

 

11

 

 

9

 

 

32

 

 

29

 

Total nonaccrual consumer and other loans

6,201

 

 

30

 

 

53

 

 

205

 

 

199

 

Total nonperforming loans

8,805

 

 

1,202

 

 

1,028

 

 

1,919

 

 

2,171

 

Foreclosed real estate, net

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

Total nonperforming assets

$    8,805

 

 

$    1,202

 

 

$    1,028

 

 

$    1,919

 

 

$    2,171

 

Nonperforming loans to total loans

1.83

%

 

0.29

%

 

0.26

%

 

0.50

%

 

0.58

%

Nonperforming assets to total assets

0.79

 

 

0.12

 

 

0.10

 

 

0.24

 

 

0.27

 

  At December 31, 
  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
Nonaccrual real estate loans:               
Residential $629  $784  $905  $820  $803 
Home equity  144   225   239   175   103 
Commercial real estate  1,892   782   1,460   177   69 
Total nonaccrual real estate loans  2,665   1,791   2,604   1,172   975 
Other loans:                    
Commercial and industrial  539   3,675   6,195   19   44 
Consumer  -   4   6   11   9 
Total nonaccrual other loans  539   3,679   6,201   30   53 
Total nonperforming loans  3,204   5,470   8,805   1,202   1,028 
Foreclosed real estate, net  223   1,662   -   -   - 
Total nonperforming assets $3,427  $7,132  $8,805  $1,202  $1,028 
Nonperforming loans to total loans  0.63%  1.15%  1.83%  0.29%  0.26%
Nonperforming assets to total assets  0.28   0.60   0.79   0.12   0.10 
9




14


Allowance for Loan Losses.  The following table presents the activity in Westfield Bank’sour allowance for loan losses and other ratios (annualized as applicable) at or for the dates indicated.

 

At or for Years Ended December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of year

$        5,726 

 

 

$        5,437 

 

 

$        5,422 

 

 

$        5,277 

 

 

$        4,642 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Charge-offs:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Residential

(131)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Commercial real estate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Home equity loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Commercial and industrial

(284)

 

 

(255)

 

 

(505)

 

 

(431)

 

 

(14)

 

    Consumer

(34)

 

 

(62)

 

 

(79)

 

 

(181)

 

 

(390)

 

        Total charge-offs

(449)

 

 

(317)

 

 

(584)

 

 

(612)

 

 

(404)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recoveries:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Residential

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Commercial real estate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Home equity loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Commercial and industrial

 

 

54 

 

 

 

 

 

 

65 

 

    Consumer

58 

 

 

149 

 

 

195 

 

 

279 

 

 

220 

 

        Total recoveries

66 

 

 

206 

 

 

209 

 

 

292 

 

 

289 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net charge-offs

(383)

 

 

(111)

 

 

(375)

 

 

(320)

 

 

(115)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for loan losses

3,453 

 

 

400 

 

 

390 

 

 

465 

 

 

750 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at end of year

$        8,796 

 

 

$        5,726 

 

 

$        5,437 

 

 

$        5,422 

 

 

$        5,277 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total loans receivable (1)

$    480,338 

 

 

$    420,067 

 

 

$    390,174 

 

 

$    383,873 

 

 

$    373,449 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average loans outstanding

$    444,492 

 

 

$    398,281 

 

 

$    386,039 

 

 

$    383,436 

 

 

$    366,677 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses as a
  percent of total loans
  receivable

1.83 

%

 

1.36 

%

 

1.39 

%

 

1.41 

%

 

1.41 

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loans charged-off as a
  percent of average loans
  outstanding

0.09 

 

 

0.03 

 

 

0.10 

 

 

0.08 

 

 

0.03 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1) Does not include unearned premiums, deferred costs and fees, or allowance for loan losses.

Westfield Bank maintains

  At or for Years Ended December 31, 
  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
    
Balance at beginning of year $7,645  $8,796  $5,726  $5,437  $5,422 
                     
Charge-offs:                    
Residential  (36)  -   (131)  -   - 
Commercial real estate  (7,536)  (50)  -   -   - 
Home equity loans  -   (117)  -   -   - 
Commercial and industrial  (2,129)  (4,910)  (284)  (255)  (505)
Consumer  (16)  (22)  (34)  (62)  (79)
Total charge-offs  (9,717)  (5,099)  (449)  (317)  (584)
                     
Recoveries:                    
Residential  7   -   -   -   4 
Commercial real estate  8   -   -   -   - 
Home equity loans  4   6   4   3   3 
Commercial and industrial  21   2   4   54   7 
Consumer  43   40   58   149   195 
Total recoveries  83   48   66   206   209 
                     
Net charge-offs  (9,634)  (5,051)  (383)  (111)  (375)
                     
Provision for loan losses  8,923   3,900   3,453   400   390 
                     
Balance at end of year $6,934  $7,645  $8,796  $5,726  $5,437 
                     
Total loans receivable (1) $508,584  $476,434  $480,338  $420,067  $390,174 
                     
Average loans outstanding $482,215  $476,214  $444,492  $398,281  $386,039 
                     
Allowance for loan losses as a                    
percent of total loans receivable  1.36%  1.60%  1.83%  1.36%  1.39%
                     
Net loans charged-off as a percent                    
of average loans outstanding  2.00   1.06   0.09   0.03   0.10 
_________________________                    
(1) Does not include unearned premiums, deferred costs and fees, or allowance for loan losses.         

We maintain an allowance for loan losses to absorb losses inherent in the loan portfolio based on ongoing quarterly assessments of the estimated losses. Westfield Bank’sOur methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance consists of a review of the components, which include a specific valuation allowance for impaired loans and a general allowance for non-impaired loans. Fluctuations in the balances of impaired loans affect the specific valuation allowance while fluctuations in volume and concentrations of loans affects the general reserve and the allocation of the allowance of the loan losses among loan types. Other factors considered in the allowance calculation include general economic or industry conditions that might impact the loan portfolio along with trends in the quality of the portfolio as measured by delinquency, non-performing and charge-offs.



15


The specific valuation allowance incorporates the results of measuring impairment for specifically identified non-homogenous problem loans in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 114, “Accounting By Creditors for Impairment of a Loan,” and SFAS No. 118, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan - Income Recognition and Disclosures.” In accordance with SFAS No. 114 and No. 118, theloans.  The specific allowance reduces the carrying amount of the impaired loans to their estimated fair value.value if collateral dependent.  A loan is recognized as impaired when it is probable that principal and/or interest are not collectible in accordance with the loan’s contractual terms.  A loan is not deemed to be impaired if there is a short delay in receipt of payment or if, during a longer period of delay, Westfield Bank expects to collect all amounts due including interest accrued at the contractual rate during the period of delay. Measurement of impairment can be based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent. Measurement of impairment does not apply to large groups of smaller balance homogenous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment such as Westfield Bank’s portfolios of consumer and residential real estate loans.


The general allowance is calculated by applying loss factors to outstanding loans by type, excluding loans for which a specific allowance has been determined.  As part of this analysis, each quarter Westfield Bank prepareswe prepare an allowance for loan losses worksheet which categorizes the loan portfolio by risk characteristics such as loan type and loan grade.  The general allowance is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant

10

change. There are a number of factors that are considered when evaluating the appropriate level of the allowance.  These factors include current economic and business conditions that affect our key lending areas, of the company, new loan products, collateral values, loan volumes and concentrations, credit quality trends such as nonperforming loans, delinquency and loan losses, and specific industry concentrations within the portfolio segments that may impact the collectabili tycollectability of the loan portfolio.

  For information on our methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses please see Footnote 1 – “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of our notes to consolidated financial statements.


In addition, management employs an independent third partythird-party to perform a semi-annualan annual review of all of Westfield Bank’sour commercial and industrial loans and owner occupied commercial real estate loans with balances or commitments equal to or greater than $750,000.  The third partythird-party also reviews all commercial investment real estate loans in excess of $750,000, as well as all adversely rated loans.


Westfield Bank’s

Our methodologies include several factors that are intended to reduce the difference between estimated and actual losses.losses; however, because these are management’s best estimates based on information known at the time, estimates may differ from actual losses incurred.  The loss factors that are used to establish the allowance for pass graded loans are designated to be self-correcting by taking into account changes in loan classification, loan concentrations and loan volumes and by permitting adjustments based on management’s judgments of qualitative factors as of the evaluation date.  Similarly, by basing the pass graded loan loss factors on loss experience over the prior threesix years, the methodology is designed to take Westfield Bank’s recent loss experience into account.




16


Westfield Bank’s

Our allowance methodology has been applied on a consistent basis.  Based on this methodology, Westfield Bank believeswe believe that it haswe have established and maintained the allowance for loan losses at adequateappropriate levels.  Future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses, however, may be necessary if economic, real estate and other conditions differ substantially from the current operating environment resulting in estimated and actual losses differing substantially.  Adjustments to the allowance for loan losses are charged to income through the provision for loan losses.


A summary of the components of the allowance for loan losses is as follows:

  December 31, 2010  December 31, 2009  December 31, 2008 
  Specific  General  Total  Specific  General  Total  Specific  General  Total 
  (In thousands) 
Real estate mortgage:                           
 Residential and home equity $-  $877  $877  $-  $487  $487  $-  $462  $462 
 Commercial  -   3,182   3,182   -   2,371   2,371   -   2,216   2,216 
                                     
Commercial and industrial  19   2,830   2,849   875   3,873   4,748   2,286   3,776   6,062 
                                     
Consumer  -   26   26   -   39   39   -   56   56 
Total $19  $6,915  $6,934  $875  $6,770  $7,645  $2,286  $6,510  $8,796 
                                     
                                     
  December 31, 2007  December 31, 2006             
  Specific  General  Total  Specific  General  Total             
  (In thousands)             
Real estate mortgage:                                    
 Residential and home equity $-  $456  $456  $-  $422  $422             
 Commercial  -   1,756   1,756   13   2,004   2,017             
                                     
Commercial and industrial  -   3,436   3,436   7   2,912   2,919             
                                     
Consumer  -   78   78   -   79   79             
Total $-  $5,726  $5,726  $20  $5,417  $5,437             

 

December 31, 2008

 

December 31, 2007

 

December 31, 2006

 

Specific

 

General

 

Total

 

Specific

 

General

 

Total

 

Specific

 

General

 

Total

 

(In thousands)

Real Estate Mortgage:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Residential and
      home equity

$          -

 

$     462

 

$     462

 

$       -

 

$     456

 

$     456

 

$       -

 

$     422

 

$    422

    Commercial

-

 

2,216

 

2,216

 

-

 

1,756

 

1,756

 

13

 

2,004

 

2,017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial and
  Industrial

2,286

 

3,776

 

6,062

 

-

 

3,436

 

3,436

 

7

 

2,912

 

2,919

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer

-

 

56

 

56

 

-

 

78

 

78

 

-

 

79

 

79

Total

$  2,286

 

$  6,510

 

$  8,796

 

$       -

 

$  5,726

 

$  5,726

 

$    20

 

$  5,417

 

$  5,437

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2005

 

December 31, 2004

 

 

 

Specific

 

General

 

Total

 

Specific

 

General

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real Estate Mortgage:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Residential and
      home equity

$          -

 

$     355

 

$     355

 

$       -

 

$     421

 

$     421

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Commercial

218

 

2,400

 

2,618

 

264

 

2,097

 

2,361

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial and
  Industrial

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32

 

2,334

 

2,366

 

236

 

2,078

 

2,314

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer

-

 

83

 

83

 

-

 

181

 

181

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

$     250

 

$  5,172

 

$  5,422

 

$  500

 

$  4,777

 

$  5,277

 

 

 

 

 

 

11


In addition, the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”), as an integral part of its examination process, periodically reviews Westfield Bank’sour loan and foreclosed real estate portfolios and the related allowance for loan losses and valuation allowance for foreclosed real estate.  The Office of Thrift SupervisionOTS may require Westfield Bankus to adjust the allowance for loan losses or the valuation allowance for foreclosed real estate based on their judgmentsjudgment of information available to them at the time of their examination, thereby adversely affecting Westfield Bank’sour results of operations.


For the year ended December 31, 2008, Westfield Bank2010, we provided $3.5$8.9 million to the allowance for loan losses based on itsour evaluation of the items discussed above.  Westfield Bank believesWe believe that the allowance for loan losses accurately reflects the level of riskincurred losses in the current loan portfolio as of December 31, 2008.




17


2010.

12

Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses.  The following tables set forth the allowance for loan losses allocated by loan category, the total loan balances by category, and the percent of loans in each category to total loans indicated.

loans.

 

At December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

Loan Category

Amount of
Loan Loss

 

Loan
Balances by
Category

 

Percent of
Loans in Each
Category to
Total Loans

 

Amount of
Loan Loss

 

Loan
Balances by
Category

 

Percent of
Loans in Each
Category to
Total Loans

 

Amount of
Loan Loss

 

Loan
Balances by
Category

 

Percent of
Loans in Each
Category to
Total Loans

 

(Dollars in thousands)

Real estate mortgages:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Commercial

$    2,216

 

$    223,857

 

46.61

%

 

$    1,756

 

$    189,964

 

45.22

%

 

$    2,017

 

$    174,556

 

44.74

%

    Residential and home equity

462

 

98,372

 

20.48

 

 

456

 

108,110

 

25.74

 

 

422

 

109,540

 

28.08

 

Commercial loans

6,062

 

153,861

 

32.03

 

 

3,436

 

116,514

 

27.74

 

 

2,919

 

100,237

 

25.69

 

Consumer loans

56

 

4,248

 

0.88

 

 

78

 

5,479

 

1.30

 

 

79

 

5,841

 

1.49

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total allowance for loan losses

$    8,796

 

$    480,338

 

100.00

%

 

$    5,726

 

$    420,067

 

100.00

%

 

$    5,437

 

$    390,174

 

100.00

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount of
Loan Loss

 

Loan
Balances by
Category

 

Percent of
Loans in Each
Category to
Total Loans

 

Amount of
Loan Loss

 

Loan
Balances by
Category

 

Percent of
Loans in Each
Category to
Total Loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate mortgages:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Commercial

$    2,618

 

$    169,564

 

44.17

%

 

$    2,361

 

$    144,336

 

38.65

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Residential and home equity

355

 

106,918

 

27.85

 

 

421

 

122,822

 

32.89

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial loans

2,366

 

100,019

 

26.06

 

 

2,314

 

94,726

 

25.36

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer loans

83

 

7,372

 

1.92

 

 

181

 

11,565

 

3.10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total allowance for loan losses

$    5,422

 

$    383,873

 

100.00

%

 

$    5,277

 

$    373,449

 

100.00

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




18


  December 31, 2010 December 31, 2009 December 31, 2008 
Loan Category 
Amount of
Loan Loss
  
Loan
Balances by
Category
  
Percent of
Loans in
Each
Category
to Total
Loans
 
Amount of
Loan Loss
  
Loan
Balances by
Category
  
Percent of
Loans in
Each
Category
to Total
Loans
 
Amount of
Loan Loss
  
Loan
Balances by
Category
  
Percent of
Loans in
Each
Category
to Total
Loans
 
  (In thousands) 
Real estate mortgage:                           
 Commercial $3,182  $221,578   43.57% $2,371  $229,061   48.08% $2,216  $223,857   46.61%
 Residential and home equity  877   148,796   29.26   487   99,054   20.79   462   98,372   20.48 
Commercial loans  2,849   135,250   26.59   4,748   145,012   30.44   6,062   153,861   32.03 
Consumer loans  26   2,960   0.58   39   3,307   0.69   56   4,248   0.88 
Total allowances for loan losses $6,934  $508,584   100.00% $7,645  $476,434   100.00% $8,796  $480,338   100.00%
                                     
                                     
  December 31, 2007 December 31, 2006            
  Amount of
Loan Loss
  Loan
Balances by
Category
  Percent of
Loans in
Each
Category
to Total
Loans
 Amount of
Loan Loss
  Loan
Balances by
Category
  Percent of
Loans in
Each
Category
to Total
Loans
            
  (In thousands)             
Real estate mortgage:                                    
 Commercial $1,756  $189,964   45.22% $2,017  $174,556   44.74%            
 Residential and home equity  456   108,110   25.74   422   109,540   28.08             
Commercial loans  3,436   116,514   27.74   2,919   100,237   25.69             
Consumer loans  78   5,479   1.30   79   5,841   1.49             
Total allowances for loan losses $5,726  $420,067   100.00% $5,437  $390,174   100.00%            

13


Potential Problem Loans. Westfield Bank hasWe have a commercial lineand industrial term loan of credit of $1.1$1.2 million with a borrower primarily engaged in the production and distribution of automotive parts and accessories.machine parts.   This potential problem loan was not delinquent as of December 31, 2008 or as2010.  In February of March 9, 2009. During 2008,2011, however, the borrower experiencedBank was notified that a decreasemajor contract to produce machined parts was in revenue. Westfield Bank intendsjeopardy and is not expected to restructure $470,892 ofbe obtained by our customer.  We intend to modify the debt to a real estate holding companyterm loan and an operating company affiliatedwork with the borrower whichto sell equipment and pay off the term loan.  A collateral analysis has been performed and no impairment is evident at this time.  The loan has been classified as a TDR for the ability to service the debt. After the restructure, the remaining balance on the linefirst quarter of credit is estimated to be $666,766 and is collateralized by inventory and accounts receivable.


2011.

Investment Activities.The Board of Directors reviewsreview and approves Westfield Bank’sapprove our investment policy on an annual basis. The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as authorized by the Board of Directors, implement this policy based on the established guidelines within the written policy.


Westfield Bank’s

Our investment policy is designed primarily to manage the interest rate sensitivity of itsour assets and liabilities, to generate a favorable return without incurring undue interest rate and credit risk, to complement itsour lending activities and to provide and maintain liquidity within the range established by policy.  In determining Westfield Bank’sour investment strategies, it considers itswe consider our interest rate sensitivity, yield, credit risk factors, maturity and amortization schedules, and other characteristics of the securities to be held.


Federally-chartered savings banks have authority to invest in various types of assets, including U.S. Treasury obligations, securities of various government-sponsored enterprises, mortgage-backed securities, certain certificates of deposit of insured financial institutions, repurchase agreements, overnight and short termshort-term loans to other banks and corporate debt instruments.


Securities Portfolio.Westfield Financial classifies In August 2010, we transferred all of our held-to-maturity securities as held to maturity or available for sale at the date of purchase. Westfield Financial does not have anyavailable-for-sale category.  We determined that we no longer had the positive intent to hold our securities classified as trading. Heldheld-to-maturity for an indefinite period of time because of our desire to maturityhave more flexibility in managing the investment portfolio.  The securities are reportedtransferred had a total amortized cost of $287.1 million and a fair value of $299.7 million, and the net unrealized gain of $12.6 million was recorded as other comprehensive income at cost, adjusted for amortizationthe time of premium and accretion of discount.transfer.  Available for sale securities are reported at fair value.  At December 31, 2008, held to maturity securities totaled $247.6 million, or 49.0% of2010, the totalentire securities portfolio was classified as available-for-sale and available for sale investments totaled $258.2 million, or 51.0% of Westfield Financial’s total securities portfolio.

$644.1 million.


Westfield Financial invests

We invest in Government-sponsoredgovernment-sponsored enterprise debt securities, the majority of which have average lives of less than five years.  Westfield FinancialWe also investsinvest in municipal bonds issued by cities and towns in Massachusetts andthat are rated as investment grade by Moody’s, Standard and Poor’s, or Fitch, and the majority of which are also independently insured.  These securities generally have maturities between seven and 20 years; however, many have earlier call dates.  In addition, Westfield Financial haswe have investments in Federal Home Loan Bank stock and mutual funds that invest only in securities allowed by the Office of Thrift Supervision.

OTS.




19


Westfield Financial’s

Our mortgage-backed securities, the majority of which are directly or indirectly insured or guaranteed by Freddie Mac, Ginnie Mae or Fannie Mae, consist of both fixed rate and adjustable rate securities primarily with average lives of less than five years.  At December 31, 2008, Westfield Financial2010, we owned $37.5$7.6 million in Collateralized Mortgage Obligations which were rated AAA by Standard and Poors, the majority of which are privately issued. The securities have gross unrealized losses of $11.4 million at December 31, 2008. Management has determined that an orderly and active market for these securities did not exist based upon a reduction in trading volume and widening spreads during the third quarter of 2008. Based upon detailed analysis, management believes it is probable that all principal and interest will be collected according to the contractual terms of the securities and no d eclines are other than temporary at December 31, 2008. Management will continually monitor these securities for deterioration in delinquency, loss rates and real estate values as this may increase the probability that a loss will be incurred.


private-label residential mortgage-backed securities.

14

The following table sets forth the composition of Westfield Bank’sour securities portfolio at the dates indicated.


 

At December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Fair
Value

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Fair
Value

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Fair
Value

 

(In thousands)

Debt Securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Government-sponsored enterprises

$    60,924

 

$    64,105

 

$  101,906

 

$  103,638

 

$    81,916

 

$    81,242

Municipal bonds

36,354

 

36,655

 

32,993

 

33,402

 

30,204

 

30,387

Total securities

97,278

 

100,760

 

134,899

 

137,040

 

112,120

 

111,629

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage-backed securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fannie Mae

195,307

 

196,080

 

176,416

 

176,928

 

150,547

 

148,310

Freddie Mac

120,596

 

122,078

 

141,662

 

142,535

 

90,972

 

90,477

Ginnie Mae

48,293

 

47,977

 

15,882

 

15,883

 

22,060

 

21,695

Collateralized mortgage obligations

48,916

 

36,328

 

45,844

 

45,382

 

27,336

 

27,169

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total mortgage-backed securities

413,112

 

402,463

 

379,804

 

380,728

 

290,915

 

287,651

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Marketable equity securities

6,301

 

6,127

 

7,364

 

6,840

 

7,260

 

6,996

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total securities

$  516,691

 

$  509,350

 

$  522,067

 

$  524,608

 

$  410,295

 

$  406,276




20


  At December 31, 
  2010  2009  2008 
  Amortized  Fair  Amortized  Fair  Amortized  Fair 
  Cost  Value  Cost  Value  Cost  Value 
  (In thousands) 
Debt securities:                  
Government-sponsored enterprises $18,447  $17,864  $45,884  $47,358  $60,924  $64,105 
Municipal bonds  42,119   43,077   36,316   37,774   36,354   36,655 
Total debt securities  60,566   60,941   82,200   85,132   97,278   100,760 
                         
Mortgage-backed securities:                        
Government sponsored residential mortgage-backed  381,436   380,984   494,324   500,659   315,903   318,158 
U.S. government guaranteed residential mortgage-backed  192,609   187,676   17,364   17,333   48,293   47,977 
Private label residential mortgage-backed  8,251   7,578   15,317   13,068   48,916   36,328 
Total mortgage-backed securities  582,296   576,238   527,005   531,060   413,112   402,463 
                         
Marketable equity securities                        
Mutual funds  6,949   6,913   6,561   6,489   6,231   6,088 
Common and preferred stock  70   47   70   59   70   39 
Total marketable equity securities  7,019   6,960   6,631   6,548   6,301   6,127 
                         
Total securities $649,881  $644,139  $615,836  $622,740  $516,691  $509,350 
                         
                         
15

Mortgage-Backed Securities.  The following table sets forth the amortized cost and fair value of Westfield Bank’sour mortgage-backed securities, which are classified as available for sale or held to maturity at the dates indicated.


 

At December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Percent of
Total

 

Fair
Value

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Percent of
Total

 

Fair
Value

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Percent of
Total

 

Fair
Value

 

(Dollars in thousands)

Mortgage-backed securities available
    for sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fannie Mae

$  105,397

 

25.51

%

 

$  105,304

 

$    74,062

 

19.50

%

 

$    74,658

 

$    47,203

 

16.23

%

 

$    46,730

Freddie Mac

56,529

 

13.68

 

 

56,972

 

86,411

 

22.75

 

 

87,202

 

49,554

 

17.03

 

 

49,378

Ginnie Mae

40,401

 

9.78

 

 

40,424

 

5,674

 

1.49

 

 

5,687

 

8,635

 

2.97

 

 

8,543

Collateralized mortgage obligations

42,453

 

10.28

 

 

31,047

 

39,063

 

10.28

 

 

38,631

 

22,430

 

7.71

 

 

22,291

Total mortgage-backed securities
    available for sale

244,780

 

59.25

 

 

233,747

 

205,210

 

54.02

 

 

206,178

 

127,822

 

43.94

 

 

126,942

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage-backed securities held to
    maturity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fannie Mae

89,910

 

21.77

 

 

90,776

 

102,354

 

26.95

 

 

102,270

 

103,344

 

35.52

 

 

101,580

Freddie Mac

64,067

 

15.51

 

 

65,106

 

55,251

 

14.55

 

 

55,333

 

41,418

 

14.24

 

 

41,099

Ginnie Mae

7,892

 

1.91

 

 

7,553

 

10,208

 

2.69

 

 

10,196

 

13,425

 

4.61

 

 

13,152

Collateralized mortgage obligations

6,463

 

1.56

 

 

5,281

 

6,781

 

1.79

 

 

6,751

 

4,906

 

1.69

 

 

4,878

Total mortgage-backed securities
    held to maturity

168,332

 

40.75

 

 

168,716

 

174,594

 

45.98

 

 

174,550

 

163,093

 

56.06

 

 

160,709

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total mortgage-backed securities

$  413,112

 

100.00

%

 

$  402,463

 

$  379,804

 

100.00

%

 

$  380,728

 

$  290,915

 

100.00

%

 

$  287,651

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




21


indicated.

  At December 31, 
   2010   2009   2008 
  Amortized
Cost
  Percent of
Total
  Fair
Value
  Amortized
Cost
  Percent of
Total
  Fair
Value
   Amortized
Cost
  Percent of
Total
  Fair
Value
 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
Available for sale:                           
Government sponsored residential $381,436   65.50% $380,984  $289,840   55.00% $290,248  $161,926   39.20% $162,276 
U.S. government guaranteed residential  192,609   33.08   187,676   1,030   0.19   1,047   40,401   9.78   40,424 
Private label residential  8,251   1.42   7,578   10,368   1.97   8,510   42,453   10.28   31,047 
Total available for sale  582,296   100.00   576,238   301,238   57.16   299,805   244,780   59.26   233,747 
                                     
Held to maturity:                                    
Government sponsored residential  -   -   -   204,484   38.80   210,411   153,977   37.27   155,882 
U.S. government guaranteed residential  -   -   -   16,334   3.10   16,286   7,892   1.91   7,553 
Private label residential  -   -   -   4,949   0.94   4,558   6,463   1.56   5,281 
Total held to maturity  -   -   -   225,767   42.84   231,255   168,332   40.74   168,716 
                                     
Total mortgage-backed securities $582,296   100.00% $576,238  $527,005   100.00% $531,060  $413,112   100.00% $402,463 
                                     
16

Securities Portfolio Maturities.  The composition and maturities of the debt securities portfolio (debt securities) and the mortgage-backed securities portfolio at December 31, 20082010 are summarized in the following table.  Maturities are based on the final contractual payment dates, and do not reflect the impact of prepayments or redemptions that may occur.


 

One Year or Less

 

More than One Year
through Five Years

 

More than Five Years
through Ten Years

 

More than Ten Years

 

Total Securities

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Weighted
Average
Yield

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Weighted
Average
Yield

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Weighted
Average
Yield

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Weighted
Average
Yield

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Fair
Value

 

Weighted
Average
Yield

 

(Dollars in thousands)

Securities available for sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Government-sponsored enterprises

$           -

 

 -

%

 

$      5,018

 

 5.41

%

 

$              -

 

 -

%

 

$    11,000

 

 5.00

%

 

$    16,018

 

$    16,299

 

 4.52

%

Municipal bonds

-

 

 -

 

 

-

 

 -

 

 

 850

 

 4.04

 

 

 1,107

 

 4.04

 

 

 1,957

 

 1,970

 

 3.89

 

Total securities

-

 

 -

 

 

5,018

 

 5.41

 

 

 850

 

 4.04

 

 

 12,107

 

 4.91

 

 

 17,975

 

 18,269

 

 4.45

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage-backed securities
  available for sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ginnie Mae

-

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 40,401

 

 5.46

 

 

 40,401

 

 40,424

 

 5.46

 

Fannie Mae

-

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 3,411

 

 4.65

 

 

 101,986

 

 5.31

 

 

 105,397

 

 105,304

 

 5.28

 

Freddie Mac

-

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 56,529

 

 5.28

 

 

 56,529

 

 56,972

 

 5.21

 

Collateralized mortgage obligations

-

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 2,091

 

 5.39

 

 

 40,362

 

 5.18

 

 

 42,453

 

 31,047

 

 9.56

 

Total mortgage-backed securities

-

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 5,502

 

 4.93

 

 

 239,278

 

 5.31

 

 

 244,780

 

 233,747

 

 5.86

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

$           -

 

 -

%

 

$      5,018

 

 5.41

%

 

$      6,352

 

 4.81

%

 

$  251,385

 

5.29

%

 

$  262,755

 

$  252,016

 

 5.76

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Securities held to maturity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Government-sponsored enterprises

$           -

 

 -

%

 

$    15,092

 

 5.56

%

 

$    29,814

 

 5.08

%

 

$              -

 

 -

%

 

$    44,906

 

$    47,806

 

 3.95

 

Municipal bonds

-

 

 -

 

 

5,838

 

 3.61

 

 

 14,300

 

 4.07

 

 

 14,259

 

 4.33

 

 

 34,397

 

 34,685

 

 3.87

 

Total investment securities

-

 

 -

 

 

 20,930

 

 5.02

 

 

 44,114

 

 4.75

 

 

 14,259

 

 4.33

 

 

 79,303

 

 82,491

 

 3.92

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage-backed securities
  held to maturity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ginnie Mae

1

 

(1.42)

 

 

 203

 

 4.17

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 7,688

 

 4.02

 

 

 7,892

 

 7,553

 

 4.44

 

Fannie Mae

825

 

(2.60)

 

 

 5,550

 

 3.02

 

 

 5,185

 

 4.44

 

 

 78,350

 

 5.08

 

 

 89,910

 

 90,776

 

 4.82

 

Freddie Mac

138

 

(41.98)

 

 

 2,270

 

 1.26

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 61,659

 

 5.33

 

 

 64,067

 

 65,106

 

 4.79

 

Collateralized mortgage obligations

-

 

-

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 6,463

 

 5.45

 

 

 6,463

 

 5,281

 

 7.70

 

Total mortgage-backed securities

964

 

(8.24)

 

 

 8,023

 

 2.55

 

 

 5,185

 

 4.44

 

 

 154,160

 

 5.14

 

 

 168,332

 

 168,716

 

 4.88

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

$      964

 

(8.24)

%

 

$    28,953

 

 4.33

%

 

$    49,299

 

 4.72

%

 

$  168,419

 

 5.07

%

 

$  247,635

 

$  251,207

 

 4.56

%




22



  One Year or Less  
More than One Year
through Five Years
  More than Five Years
through Ten Years
   More than Ten Years   Total Securities 
   Amortized
Cost
  Weighted
Average
Yield
  Amortized
Cost
  Weighted
Average
Yield
  Amortized
Cost
  Weighted
Average
Yield
  Amortized
Cost
  Weighted
Average
Yield
  Amortized
Cost
  Fair
Value
  Weighted
Average
Yield
 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
Debt securities:                                 
Government-sponsored
   enterprises
 $-  -% $8,497  2.02% $-  -% $9,950  3.24% $18,447  $17,864  2.68%
Municipal bonds  896  3.43   9,814  3.69   21,361  3.94   10,048  4.39   42,119   43,077  3.98 
Total debt
    securities
  896  3.43   18,311  2.92   21,361  3.94   19,998  3.82   60,566   60,941  3.59 
                                        
Mortgage-backed securities:                                       
Government sponsored
   residential mortgage-
   backed
  3  5.00   981  4.11   17,476  3.28   362,976  3.10   381,436   380,984  3.11 
U.S. government
   guaranteed residential
   mortgage-backed
  -  -   74  1.95   -  -   192,535  2.92   192,609   187,676  2.92 
Private label residential
    mortgage-backed
  -  -   -  -   -  -   8,251  5.73   8,251   7,578  5.73 
    Total mortgage-
       backed securities
  3  5.00   1,055  3.96   17,476  3.28   563,762  3.07   582,296   576,238  3.08 
                                        
Total $899  3.44% $19,366  2.97% $38,837  3.64% $583,760  3.10% $642,862  $637,179  3.13%
                                        
17

Sources of Funds


General.  Deposits, short-term borrowings, long-term debt, scheduled amortization and prepayments of loan principal, maturities and calls of investments securities and funds provided by operations are Westfield Bank’sour primary sources of funds for use in lending, investing and for other general purposes.  See“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources.”


Deposits. Westfield Bank offers  We offer a variety of deposit accounts having a range of interest rates and terms.  Westfield BankWe currently offersoffer regular savings deposits (consisting of passbook and statement savings accounts), NOW accounts, noninterest-bearing demand accounts, money market accounts and time deposits. Westfield Bank hasWe have expanded the types of deposit products that it offerswe offer to include jumbo certificates of deposit, tiered money market accounts and customer repurchase agreements to compliment itscomplement our increased emphasis on attracting commercial banking relationships.


Deposit flows are influenced significantly by general and local economic conditions, changes in prevailing interest rates, pricing of deposits and competition.  Westfield Bank’sOur deposits are primarily obtained from areas surrounding itsour offices.  Westfield Bank reliesWe rely primarily on paying competitive rates, service and long-standing relationships with customers to attract and retain these deposits. Westfield Bank does not use brokers to obtain deposits.


When Westfield Bank determines itswe determine our deposit rates, it considerswe consider local competition, U.S. Treasury securities offerings and the rates charged on other sources of funds.  Core deposits (defined as regular accounts, money market accounts, NOW accounts and demand accounts) represented 44.3%49.5% of total deposits on December 31, 20082010 and 41.4%47.1% on December 31, 2007.2009.  At December 31, 20082010 and December 31, 2007,2009, time deposits with remaining terms to maturity of less than one year amounted to $245.9$236.9 million and $266.2$242.3 million, respectively.  See“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Net Interest and Dividend Income” for information relating to the average balances and costs of Westfield Bank’sour deposit accounts for the years ended December 31, 2008, 20072010, 2009 and 2006.




23


2008.

Deposit Distribution and Weighted Average.Average Rates.  The following table sets forth the distribution of Westfield Bank’sour deposit accounts, by account type, at the dates indicated.

indicated
.


 

 

 

At December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

Amount

 

Percent

 

Weighted
Average
Rates

 

Amount

 

Percent

 

Weighted
Average
Rates

 

Amount

 

Percent

 

Weighted
Average
Rates

 

(Dollars in thousands)

Demand deposits

$    50,860

 

 8.65

%

 

 -

%

 

$    42,408

 

 7.04

%

 

 -

%

 

$    42,383

 

 6.75

%

 

 -

%

NOW accounts

 83,788

 

 14.25

 

 

 1.17

 

 

 85,316

 

 14.15

 

 

 1.62

 

 

 80,527

 

 12.83

 

 

 1.40

 

Regular Accounts

 68,085

 

 11.58

 

 

 1.05

 

 

 47,072

 

 7.81

 

 

 1.24

 

 

 36,110

 

 5.76

 

 

 0.50

 

Money Market Accounts

 57,655

 

 9.80

 

 

 0.94

 

 

 74,601

 

 12.38

 

 

 1.24

 

 

 94,441

 

 15.05

 

 

 1.51

 

Total non-certificated accounts

 260,388

 

 44.28

 

 

 0.86

 

 

 249,397

 

 41.38

 

 

 1.16

 

 

 253,461

 

 40.39

 

 

 1.08

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Time certificates of deposit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Due within 1 year

 245,939

 

 41.83

 

 

 3.30

 

 

 266,234

 

 44.18

 

 

 4.49

 

 

 270,026

 

 43.04

 

 

 4.40

 

Over 1 year through 3 years

 78,627

 

 13.37

 

 

 3.82

 

 

 79,806

 

 13.24

 

 

 4.26

 

 

 91,201

 

 14.53

 

 

 4.33

 

Over 3 years

 3,075

 

 0.52

 

 

 3.43

 

 

 7,239

 

 1.20

 

 

 4.50

 

 

 12,778

 

 2.04

 

 

 4.56

 

Total certificated accounts

327,641

 

 55.72

 

 

 3.43

 

 

 353,279

 

 58.62

 

 

 4.44

 

 

 374,005

 

 59.61

 

 

 4.39

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

$  588,029

 

 100.00

%

 

2.29

%

 

$  602,676

 

100.00

%

 

 3.08

%

 

$  627,466

 

 100.00

%

 

 3.05

%



24

  At December, 31 
  2010  2009  2008 
  Amount  Percent  Weighted
Average
Rates
  Amount  Percent  Weighted
Average
Rates
  Amount  Percent  Weighted
Average
Rates
 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
                                     
Demand deposits $85,217   12.17%  -% $80,110   12.36%  -% $50,860   8.65%  -%
Now accounts  83,621   11.94   1.08   70,462   10.87   1.42   83,788   14.25   1.17 
Regular accounts  101,333   14.47   0.62   104,650   16.15   0.88   68,085   11.58   1.05 
Money market accounts  76,184   10.88   0.57   50,120   7.74   0.74   57,655   9.80   0.94 
Total non-certificate accounts  346,355   49.46   0.57   305,342   47.12   0.75   260,388   44.28   0.86 
                                     
Time certificates of deposit:                                    
Due within the year  236,926   33.83   1.79   242,318   37.40   2.41   245,939   41.83   3.30 
Over 1 year through 3 years  72,582   10.36   2.22   85,867   13.25   2.65   78,627   13.37   3.82 
Over 3 years  44,472   6.35   2.62   14,448   2.23   2.02   3,075   0.52   3.43 
Total certificate accounts  353,980   50.54   1.98   342,633   52.88   2.45   327,641   55.72   3.43 
                                     
Total $700,335   100.00%  1.28% $647,975   100.00%  1.65% $588,029   100.00%  2.29%


18




Certificate of Deposit Maturities.At December 31, 2008, Westfield Bank2010, we had $ 86.7$115.5 million in time certificates of deposit with balances of $100,000 and over maturing as follows:

Maturity Period Amount  Weighted
Average
Rate
 
  (In thousands)    
       
 3 months or less $24,971   2.21%
 Over 3 months through 6 months  18,187   1.80 
 Over 6 months through 12 months  31,929   1.55 
 Over 12 months  40,458   2.40 
 Total $115,545   2.03%

Maturity Period

 

Amount

 

Weighted
Average
Rate

 

 

(Dollars in Thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three months or less

 

$            11,134

 

 3.36

%

Over three months through six months

 

24,274

 

 3.22

 

Over six months through 12 months

 

30,388

 

 3.50

 

Over 12 months

 

20,904

 

 3.91

 

Total

 

$            86,700

 

 3.50

%


Certificate of Deposit Balances by Rates.  The following table sets forth, by interest rate ranges, information concerning Westfield Bank’sour time certificates of deposit at the dates indicated.


 

At December 31, 2008

 

Period to Maturity

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less than
One Year

 

One to Two
Years

 

Two to
Three Years

 

More than
Three Years

 

Total

 

Percent
of Total

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

2.00% and under

$      11,805

 

$             6

 

$           10

 

$           4

 

$      11,825

 

 3.61

%

2.01% to 3.00%

 55,063

 

 4,484

 

 3,769

 

 189

 

 63,505

 

 19.38

 

3.01% to 4.00%

 134,020

 

 27,022

 

 16,344

 

 2,207

 

 179,593

 

 54.82

 

4.01% to 5.00%

 38,269

 

 17,042

 

 7,260

 

 675

 

 63,246

 

 19.30

 

5.01% and over

 6,782

 

 2,690

 

 -

 

 -

 

 9,472

 

 2.89

 

Total

$    245,939

 

$    51,244

 

$    27,383

 

$    3,075

 

$    327,641

 

 100.00

%

  At December 31, 2010 
  Period to Maturity       
  Less than
One Year
  One to
Two Years
  Two to
Three Years
  More than
Three Years
  Total  Percent of
Total
 
  (Dollars in thousands)    
                         
2.00% and under $187,799  $16,659  $16,011  $8,853  $229,322   64.78%
2.01% to 3.00%  23,161   12,373   24,771   35,481   95,786   27.06 
3.01% to 4.00%  18,895   2,001   45   138   21,079   5.96 
4.01% to 5.00%  7,071   323   399   -   7,793   2.20 
Total $236,926  $31,356  $41,226  $44,472  $353,980   100.00%



25




Short-term borrowings and long-term debt. Westfield Bank  We also utilizesutilize short-term borrowings and long-term debt as an additional source of funds to finance Westfield Bank’sour lending and investing activities and to provide liquidity for daily operations.  Short-term borrowings are made up of Federal Home Loan BankFHLBB advances with an original maturity of less than one year as well as customer repurchase agreements, which have an original maturity of one day.  Short-term borrowings issued by the Federal Home Loan BankFHLBB were $28.5$50.6 million at December 31, 20082010 and $18.4$58.0 million at December 31, 2007. Westfield Bank’s2009.  Our repurchase agreements are with commercial customers.  These agreements are linked to customers’ checking accounts.  Excess funds are swept out of certain commercial checking accounts and into repurchase agreements where the customers can earn interest on their funds.  By law, a bank cannot pay interest on commercial checking accounts; however, interest can be paid on non-deposit products such as repurchase agreements.  At December 31, 20082010 and 2007,2009, such repurchase agreementsagreement borrowings totaled $21.3$12.3 million and $16.8$16.5 million, respectively.


Long-term debt consists of FHLBFHLBB advances, and securities sold under repurchase agreements and customer repurchase agreements with an original maturity of one year or more.  At December 31, 2008, Westfield Bank2010, we had $115.0$151.6 million in long-term debt with the FHLB and $58.3FHLBB, $81.3 million in securities sold under repurchase agreements with an approved broker-dealer.broker-dealer and $5.2 million in long-term customer repurchase agreements.  This compares to $105.0$127.5 million in FHLBFHLBB advances and no$81.3 million in securities sold under repurchase agreements with an approved broker-dealer and $5.0 million in long-term customer repurchase agreements at December 31, 2007.2009.  At December 31, 2008,2010, securities sold under repurchase agreements of $58.3$81.3 million were executed with a weighted average interest rate of 2.62%2.8% and final maturities of $9.8$14.8 million in the year 2013, $28.0 million in the year 2014, and $48.5$38.5 million in the year 2018.  The securities sold under agreements to repurchase are callable at the issuer’s option beginning in the years 20092011 to 2012.


19

Personnel


As of December 31, 2008, Westfield Bank2010, we had 140153 full-time employees and 4739 part-time employees. The employees are not represented by a collective bargaining unit, and Westfield Bank considers itswe consider our relationship with itsour employees to be excellent.


REGULATION


26




TAXATION

Federal


General. The following discussion is intended as only a summary and does not purport to be a comprehensive description of the tax rules applicable to Westfield Bank or Westfield Financial. For federal income tax purposes, Westfield Bank reports its income on the basis of a taxable year ending December 31, using the accrual method of accounting, and Westfield Financial is generally subject to federal income taxation in the same manner as other corporations. Since December 27, 2001, Westfield Bank and Westfield Financial have constituted an affiliated group of corporations and, therefore, have reported their income on a consolidated basis. The tax years up to and including the year ended December 31, 2004 are closed.


Distributions. To the extent that Westfield Bank makes “non-dividend distributions” to stockholders, such distributions will be considered to result in distributions from Westfield Bank’s unrecaptured tax bad debt reserve “base year reserve” (i.e. its reserve as of December 31, 1987), to the extent thereof and then from its supplemental reserve for losses on loans, and an amount based on the amount distributed, but no more than the amount of these reserves, will be included in Westfield Bank’s taxable income. Non-dividend distributions include distributions in excess of Westfield Bank’s current and accumulated earnings and profits, distributions in redemption of stock and distributions in partial or complete liquidation. However, dividends paid out of Westfield Bank’s current or accumulated earnings and profits, as calculated for federal income tax purposes, will not constitute non- dividend distributions and, therefore, will not be included in Westfield Bank’s income.


The amount of additional income created from a non-dividend distribution is equal to the lesser of Westfield Bank’s base year reserve and supplemental reserve for losses on loans or an amount that, when reduced by the tax attributable to the income, is equal to the amount of the distribution. Thus, in some situations, approximately one and one-half times the non-dividend distribution would be includible in gross income for federal income tax purposes, assuming a 34% federal corporate income tax rate. Westfield Bank does not intend to pay dividends that would result in the recapture of any portion of the bad debt reserves.


Corporate Alternative Minimum Tax. The alternative minimum tax rules have been devised to ensure that at least a minimum amount of income tax is paid by high-income corporate taxpayers who take advantage of substantial tax savings due to the use of certain tax deductions and exemptions. In essence, the alternative minimum tax functions as a recapture mechanism, reclaiming some of the tax deductions and credits utilized by these taxpayers when calculating their regular federal income tax liability. In general, a corporation’s alternative minimum taxable income is equal to its regular taxable income, increased by its preference items for the year and adjusted by computing certain items under special rules that negate the acceleration of certain tax benefits which are available under the regular tax rules. The alternative minimum tax rate is 20%. Such preference items include adjustments for tax exempt interest, inside build-up of life insurance policies and accelerated depreciation deductions. During the past five years, we have not been subject to alternative minimum tax and therefore have no alternative minimum tax net operating losses or credit to utilize.



27





Elimination of Dividends; Dividends Received Deduction. Westfield Financial may exclude from its income 100% of dividends received from Westfield Bank as a member of the same affiliated group of corporations.


Net Operating Losses. A financial institution may carry back net operating losses to the preceding two taxable years and forward to the succeeding twenty taxable years. At December 31, 2008, Westfield Financial had no net operating loss carry forwards for federal income tax purposes.


State


Until 2009, financial institutions in Massachusetts were not allowed to file consolidated income tax returns. Instead, each entity in the consolidated group files a separate annual income tax return. Beginning in 2009, Westfield Financial and Westfield Bank will be required to file a combined return pursuant to a Massachusetts law change enacted in July 2008. The security corporation subsidiaries will continue to file separately. The Massachusetts excise tax rate for savings banks is currently 10.5% of federal taxable income, adjusted for certain items. Taxable income includes gross income as defined under the Internal Revenue Code, plus interest from bonds, notes and evidences of indebtedness of any state, including Massachusetts, less deductions, but not the credits, allowable under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, except for those deductions relating to dividends received and income or franchise taxes imposed by a state or political subdivision. Carryforwards and carrybacks of net operating losses and capital losses are not allowed.


Due to the legislative change referred to above, beginning in 2010 the Massachusetts financial institution tax rate will decrease by 0.5% each year for three years until 2012, when it will become 9% and will remain at that rate. Westfield Financial’s subsidiaries, Elm Street Securities Corporation and WFD Securities Corporation are taxed as Massachusetts security corporations, and are subject to a state tax rate of 1.32% of gross income.


Westfield Financial’s state tax returns, as well as those of its subsidiaries, are not currently under audit.




28




REGULATION


General.  As a federally-chartered savings bank, Westfieldthe Bank is currently subject to regulation, examination, and supervision by the Office of Thrift SupervisionOTS as its chartering authority, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) as its deposit insurer.  WestfieldThe Bank must file reports with the Office of Thrift SupervisionOTS and the FDIC describing itsour activities and financial condition.  WestfieldThe Bank is also subject to certain reserve and other requirements promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board.  This supervision and regulation is intended primarily for the protection of depositors’ funds, federal deposit insurance funds and the banking system as a whole, not shareholders.


As the holding company of a savings bank, Westfield Financial is a savings and loan holding companyalso regulated by the Office of Thrift Supervision.OTS.  As such, Westfield Financial is registered with and subject to Office of Thrift SupervisionOTS examination and supervision, as well as certain Office of Thrift SupervisionOTS reporting requirements.  In addition, the Office of Thrift SupervisionOTS has enforcement authority over Westfield Financial and Westfield Financial’s non-savings associationnon-savings-association subsidiaries.  Among other things, this authority permits the Office of Thrift SupervisionOTS to restrict or prohibit activities that are determined to be a serious risk to the financial safety, soundness or stability of a subsidiary savings association.  Unlike bank holding companies, federal savings and loan holding companies are currently not subject to any regulatory capital requirements or to supervision by the Federal Reserve Board.  Westfield Financial also is required to file reports with the Office of Thrift SupervisionOTS and the Securities and Exchange Commission,SEC, and otherwise comply with the rules and regulations of the Office of Thrift SupervisionOTS and the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC under federal securities laws.


The Office

Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act” or “Dodd-Frank”), enacted on July 21, 2010, the OTS will be abolished as of Thrift SupervisionJuly 21, 2011 (the “Transfer Date”) and the FDIC have significant discretion in connection with their supervisoryits powers and enforcement activities and examination policies. Any change in such policies, whether byduties transferred to the Office of Thrift Supervision, the FDIC,Comptroller of the SecuritiesCurrency (“OCC”) as to savings banks and Exchange Commission orother thrifts, and to the United States Congress, could have a material adverse impactFederal Reserve Board as to the holding companies of thrifts.  Therefore, Westfield Financial will be regulated by the Federal Reserve Board, and the Bank will be regulated by the OCC.  We cannot predict, at this point, what effect on Westfield Bank and Westfield Financial’sour operations and stockholders.

will result from this change in supervision.


The following discussion is intended to be a summary of theselected material statutes and regulations currently applicable to federal savings banks and their holding companies, and it does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all such statutes and regulations.

  Federal and state regulators also have significant discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities and examination policies.  Any change in such policy, whether by the OTS, the FDIC, the Federal Reserve Board, the OCC, the SEC, the United States Congress, or any other governmental or regulatory authority, could have a material adverse impact on the Bank and Westfield Financial’s operations and shareholders.  We also cannot predict what if any changes to our obligations under these statutes and regulations may be made by our new regulators.




29




Regulation of Federal Savings Banks


OCC Regulation.  As of July 21, 2011, the Bank will be regulated by the OCC rather than the OTS, as the OTS will be abolished as of that date pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act.  On that date, the powers of the OTS as to thrift holding companies will be transferred to the Federal Reserve Board, and to the OCC as to thrifts.  Until July 21, 2011, the Bank will continue to be regulated by the OTS.

Business Activities. Westfield  The Bank derives its lending and investment powers from the Home Owners’ Loan Act, as amended, and Officethe regulations of Thrift Supervision regulations. The Home Owners’ Loan Actthe OTS thereunder.  Those laws and the Office of Thrift Supervision regulations also limit Westfieldthe Bank’s authority to invest in certain types of loans or other investments.assets and to make certain types of loans.  Permissible investments include, but are not limited to, mortgage loans secured by residential and commercial real estate, commercial and consumer loans, certain types of debt securities, and certain other assets.  WestfieldThe Bank may also establish service corporations that may engage in activities not otherwise permissible for Westfieldthe Bank, including certain real estate equity investments and securities and insurance brokerage.


Loans to One Borrower.  Westfield Bank is generally subject to the same limits on loans to one borrower as isGenerally, a national bank. With specified exceptions, Westfield Bank’s total loansfederal savings bank may not make a loan or extensions ofextend credit to a single borrower cannot exceedor related group of borrowers in excess of 15% of Westfield Bank’sunimpaired capital and surplus.  An additional amount may be loaned, equal to 10% of unimpaired capital and surplus, if the loan is secured by readily marketable collateral, which generally does not include accumulated other comprehensive income. Westfield Bank may lend additional amounts upreal estate.  As of December 31, 2010, we were in compliance with these limitations on loans to 10% of its unimpaired capital and surplus which does not include accumulated other comprehensive income, if the loans or extensions of credit are fully-secured by readily-marketable collateral. Westfield Bank currently complies with applicable loans-to-one borrower limitations.

one borrower.

20


Qualified Thrift Lender Test.  The Home Owners’ Loan Act requires that Westfield Bank as a savings association, comply with the qualified thrift lender test. Under the qualified thrift lender test, Westfield Bank is required to maintain at least 65% of its portfolio assets in certain “qualified thrift investments” in at least nine months of the most recent twelve-month period. “Portfolio assets” means, in general, Westfield Bank’s total assets less the sum of:


specified liquid assets up to 20% of total assets;

goodwill and other intangible assets; and

the value of property used to conduct Westfield Bank’s business.

Westfield Bank also may satisfy the qualified thrift lender test by qualifyingmust either qualify as a domestic building and loan association as defined inunder the Internal Revenue Code, or maintain an appropriate level of 1986. If Westfieldcertain investments, called “Qualified Thrift Investments” (“QTIs”), to remain a “Qualified Thrift Lender” (“QTL”). QTIs must represent 65% or more of portfolio assets on a monthly average basis during 9 out of every 12 months on a continuous basis. Failure by the Bank to maintain its status as a QTL would result in the following restrictions on operations: (i) we would not be able to engage in any new activity or make any new investment, directly or indirectly, unless such activity or investment was permissible for both national banks and thrift institutions; (ii) the branching powers of the Bank would be restricted to those of a national bank; and (iii) payment of dividends would be subject to the rules regarding payment of dividends by a national bank. Additional restrictions would apply three years after we ceased to be a QTL, including requirements to dispose of certain assets not permissible for national banks and to cease engaging in activities not permissible for national banks. A thrift institution that fails to maintain its QTL status will be permitted to requalify once, and if it fails the qualified thrift lenderQTL test and is unable to correct that failure for a period ofsecond time, it must either operate under certainwill become immediately subject to all restrictions on its activities or convertdescribed above as if all time periods prior to a bank charter.


Westfield Bank met the qualified thrift lender test atsuch restrictions becoming effective had expired.  At December 31, 2008 and in each of2010, our QTL ratio was 80.0%, which exceeded the prior 12 months, and, therefore, is a “qualified thrift lender.”

requirement.


Capital Requirements. Office of Thrift Supervision  The OTS regulations require Westfieldthe Bank to meet threethe following minimum capital standards:


(1)

a tangible capital ratio requirement of 1.5% of total assets as adjusted under Office of Thrift Supervision regulations;

  (1)a tangible capital ratio requirement of 2.0% of total assets as adjusted under OTS regulations;

  (2)a leverage ratio of 3% of core capital to such adjusted total assets, if a savings association has been assigned the highest composite rating of 1 under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System; otherwise, the minimum leverage capital ratio for any other depository institution that does not have a composite rating of 1 will be 4%, unless a higher leverage capital ratio is warranted by the particular circumstances or risk profile of the depository institution;
  (3)  a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 4.0%; and

30

  (4)
a risk-based capital ratio requirement of 8% of core and supplementary capital to total risk-based assets, provided that the amount of supplementary capital used to satisfy this requirement may not exceed the amount of core capital.




(2)

a leverage ratio requirement of 3% of core capital to such adjusted total assets, if a savings association has been assigned the highest composite rating of 1 under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System; and


(3)

a risk-based capital ratio requirement of 8% of core and supplementary capital to total risk-based assets, provided that the amount of supplementary capital used to satisfy this requirement may not exceed the amount of core capital.


The minimum leverage capital ratio for any other depository institution that does not have a composite rating of 1 will be 4%, unless a higher leverage capital ratio is warranted by the particular circumstances or risk profile of the depository institution.

In determining the amount of risk-weighted assets for purposes of the risk-based capital requirement, a savings association must compute its risk-based assets by multiplying its assets and certain off-balance sheet items by risk-weights,risk weights, which range from 0% for cash and obligations issued by the United States Government or its agencies to 100% for consumer and commercial loans, as assigned by the Office of Thrift SupervisionOTS capital regulation based on the risks found by the Office of Thrift SupervisionOTS to be inherent in the type of asset.


Tangible capital is defined, generally, as common stockholders’ equity (including retained earnings), certain; non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock and related earnings,earnings; nonwithdrawable accounts and pledged deposits that would qualify as core capital; and minority interests in equity accounts of fully consolidated subsidiaries, less intangibles (other thandeductions such as certain mortgage servicing rights), and investments in and loans to subsidiaries engaged in activities not permissible for a national bank.intangible assets.  Core capital (or Tier 1 capital) is defined similarly to tangible capital, but core capital also includes other elements such as certain qualifying supervisory goodwill and certain purchased credit card relationships.goodwill.  Supplementary capital (or Tier 2 capital) currently includes elements such as cumulative and other preferred stock,stock; mandatory convertible debt securities,securities; subordinated debt and intermediate preferred stockdebt; and the allowance for loan and lease losses.losses (“ALLL”).  In addition, up to 45% of unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with a readi lyreadily determinable fair value may be included in Tier 2 capital.  The allowance for loan and lease lossesALLL includable in Tier 2 capital is limited to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets.


At December 31, 2008, Westfield Bank met2010, we exceeded each of its capital requirements, in each case on a fully phased-in basis. The table below presents Westfield Bank’sthe applicable regulatory capital as compared to the OTS regulatory capital requirements at December 31, 2008:

requirements.  


 


Bank

Capital
Requirements

Excess
Capital

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

Tangible capital

20.51%

16,070

203,674

Core capital

20.51%

42,854

176,890

Risk-based capital

35.55%

50,930

175,387




31




Community Reinvestment.  Under the Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”), as implemented by Office of Thrift Supervisionthe OTS regulations, Westfieldthe Bank has a continuing and affirmative obligation, consistent with safe and sound banking practices, to help meet the credit needs of its entire community, including low and moderate income neighborhoods.low-and moderate-income neighborhoods (“LMI”).  The Community Reinvestment ActCRA does not establish specific lending requirements or programs for financial institutions, nor does it limit an institution’s discretion to develop the types of products and services that it believes are best suited to its
21

particular community, so long as such practices are consistent with the Community Reinvestment Act.CRA.  The Community Reinvestment ActCRA requires the Office of Thrift Supervision,OTS, in connection with its examination of a savings association, to assess Westfieldthe Bank’s record of meeting the credit needs of its community and to take such record into account in its evaluation of certain applications by Westfieldthe Bank.


The Community Reinvestment ActCRA regulations establish an assessment system that bases an association’s rating on its actual performance in meeting community needs.  In particular, the assessment system focuses on three tests:


a lending test, to evaluate the institution’s record of making loans in its assessment areas;

  ●a lending test, to evaluate the institution’s record of making loans in its assessment areas;

an investment test, to evaluate the institution’s record of investing in community development projects, affordable housing, and programs benefiting low or moderate income individuals and businesses in its assessment area or a broader area that includes its assessment area; and

  ●an investment test, to evaluate the institution’s record of investing in community development projects, affordable housing, and programs benefiting low or moderate income individuals and businesses in its assessment area or a broader area that includes its assessment area; and

a service test, to evaluate the institution’s delivery of services through its retail banking channels and the extent and innovativeness of its community development services.

  ●a service test, to evaluate the institution’s delivery of services through its retail banking channels and the extent and innovativeness of its community development services.

Westfield

The Bank received a “Satisfactory” Community Reinvestment Act rating in its most recent examination.


Transactions with Affiliates. Westfield  The Bank’s authority to engage in transactions with its “affiliates”affiliates is limited by Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and the Federal Reserve Board’s Regulation W, as made applicable to federal savings associations by the Home Owners’ Loan Act and the Office of Thrift Supervision regulations.OTS regulations, which impose certain additional restrictions on affiliate transactions.  In general, these transactions must be on terms that are at least as favorable to Westfield Bank as comparable transactions with non-affiliates.  In addition, certain types of these transactions are restricted to an aggregate percentage of Westfieldthe Bank’s capital.  Collateral in specified amounts must usually be provided by affiliates in order to receive loans from Westfieldthe Bank.  In addition, Office of Thrift Supervisionthe OTS regulations prohibit a savings association from lending to any of its affiliates that engage in activities not permissible for bank holdi ngholding companies and from purchasing the securities of any affiliate, other than a subsidiary.




32




Loans to Insiders. Westfield  The Bank’s authority to extend credit to its directors, executive officers and principal stockholders,shareholders, as well as to entities controlled by such persons, is currently governed by the requirements of Sections 22(g) and 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation O of the Federal Reserve Board, as made applicable to federal savings associations by the Home Owners’ Loan Act and the Office of Thrift SupervisionOTS regulations.  Among other things, these provisions require that extensions of credit to insiders: (i) be made on terms that are substantially the same as, and follow credit underwriting procedures that are not less stringent than, those prevailing for comparable transactions with unaffiliated persons and that do not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features; and (ii) not exceed certain limitations on the amount of c reditcredit extended to such persons, individually and in the aggregate, which limits are based, in part, on the amount of Westfieldthe Bank’s capital.  In addition, extensions for credit in excess of certain limits must be approved by Westfieldthe Bank’s Board of Directors.


Enforcement.  The Office of Thrift SupervisionOTS has primary enforcement responsibility over savings associations, including Westfieldthe Bank.  This enforcement authority includes, among other things, the ability to assess civil money penalties, to issue cease and desist orders and to remove directors and officers.  In general, these enforcement actions may be initiated in response to violations of laws and regulations as well as in response to unsafe or unsound practices.


Standards for Safety and Soundness. Pursuant  The Bank is subject to certain standards designed to maintain the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, the Office of Thrift Supervision has adopted a set of guidelines prescribing safety and soundness standards. These guidelines establish general standards relating to internal controlsof individual banks and information systems, internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate risk exposure, asset growth, asset quality, earnings standards, compensation, fees and benefits. In general, the guidelines require appropriate systems and practices to identify and manage the risks and exposures specified in the guidelines.

In addition, the Office of Thrift Supervision adopted regulations that authorize, but do not require, the Office of Thrift Supervision to order a savings association thatbanking system.  The OTS has been given notice that it is not satisfying theseprescribed safety and soundness guidelines relating to (i) internal controls, information systems and internal audit systems; (ii) loan documentation; (iii) credit underwriting; (iv) interest rate exposure; (v) asset growth, concentration, and quality; (vi) earnings; and (vii) compensation and benefit standards for officers, directors, employees and principal stockholders.  A savings institution not meeting one or more of the safety and soundness guidelines may be required to submitfile a compliance plan. If, after being notified, a savings association fails to submit an acceptable plan of compliance or fails in any material respect to implement an accepted plan,with the Office of Thrift Supervision must issue an order directing action to correctOTS.


Prompt Corrective Action.  The federal banking agencies have established by regulation, for each capital measure, the deficiency, may issue an order directing other actions of the types tolevels at which an undercapitalized associationinsured institution is subject under the “prompt corrective action” provisions of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act. If a savings association fails“well capitalized,” “adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized,” or “critically undercapitalized.”  The federal banking agencies are required to comply with such an order, the Office of Thrift Supervision may seek to enforce such order in judicial proceedings and to impose civil money pen alties.

Prompt Corrective Regulatory Action. Pursuant to the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and the Office of Thrift Supervisiontake prompt corrective action regulations,with respect to insured institutions that fall below the Office“adequately capitalized” level. Any insured depository institution that falls below the “adequately capitalized” level must submit a capital restoration plan, and, if its capital levels further decline or do not increase, will face increased scrutiny and more stringent supervisory action.  As of Thrift Supervision is required to take certain, and is authorized to take other, supervisory actions against undercapitalized savings associations. For this purpose, a savings association would be placed in one ofDecember 31, 2010, the following four categories based onmost recent notification from the association’s capital:

well-capitalized;



33




adequately capitalized;


undercapitalized; or


critically undercapitalized.


When appropriate,OTS categorized us as “well capitalized” under the Office of Thrift Supervision can requireprompt corrective action by a savings and loan holding company under the “prompt corrective action” provisions of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.

framework.  

22


At December 31, 2008, Westfield Bank met the criteria for being considered “well-capitalized.”


Capital Distributions. The Office of  Thrift Supervision imposes various restrictions or requirementsinstitutions are subject to limitations on Westfield Bank’stheir ability to make capital distributions includingsuch as dividends, stock redemptions or repurchases, cash-out mergers, and other transactions charged to the payment of cash dividends. A savings association that is the subsidiarycapital account of a savings and loan holding company must file a notice withthrift institution. In general, an application to the Office of Thrift Supervision at least 30 days before making a capital distribution. Westfield Bank must file an applicationOTS for prior approval ifto pay a dividend is required when that dividend, combined with all distributions made during the total amount of its capital distributions for the applicable calendar year, would exceed an amount equal to Westfield Bank’sa thrift institution’s net income for that yearyear-to-date plus Westfield Bank’s retained net income for the previousproceeding two years.


The Office of Thrift Supervision may disapprove of a notice of application if:


Westfield Bankyears, or that would cause the thrift institution to be undercapitalized following the distribution;


the proposed capital distribution raises safety and soundness concerns; or


the capital distribution would violate a prohibition containedless than adequately capitalized.  We are currently in any statute, regulation, or agreement.

compliance with this requirement.


Liquidity. Westfield  The Bank is required to maintain a sufficient amount of liquid assets to ensure its safe and sound operation.


Insurance of Deposit Accounts.  The deposits of the Bank are insured by the FDIC is an independent federal agency that insures deposits, up to prescribed statutorythe applicable limits of federally insured banksestablished by law and savings institutions and safeguardsare subject to the safety and soundnessdeposit insurance premium assessments of the banking and savings industries. Previously, the FDIC administered two separate insurance funds, the Bank Insurance Fund (“BIF”), which generally insured commercial bank and state savings bank deposits, and the Savings Association Insurance Fund (“SAIF”), which generally insured savings association deposits.


Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005 (the “Reform Act”), which was signed into law on February 15, 2006, the Bank Insurance Fund and the Savings Association Insurance Fund were merged into a new combined fund, called the Deposit Insurance Fund (the “DIF”(“DIF”).  The FDIC was also given greater latitude in setting thecurrently maintains a risk-based assessment system under which assessment rates for insured depository institutions which could be used to impose minimum assessments.



34




Pursuant to the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, the maximum deposit insurance amount has been increased from $100,000 to $250,000 until December 31, 2009. On October 13, 2008, the FDIC established a Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program under which the FDIC will fully guarantee all non-interest-bearing transaction accounts and all senior unsecured debt of any insured depository institutions or their qualified holding companies that did not opt out of the program issued between October 14, 2008 and June 30, 2009. Senior unsecured debt includes federal funds purchased and certificates of deposit outstanding to the credit of the bank with a maturity of 30 days or greater.

The FDIC is authorized to set the reserve ratio for the Deposit Insurance Fund annually at between 1.15% and 1.50% of estimated insured deposits. If the Deposit Insurance Fund’s reserves exceed the designated reserve ratio, the FDIC is required to pay out all or, if the reserve ratio is less than 1.50%, a portion of the excess as a dividend to insured depository institutionsvary based on the percentagelevel of insured deposits held on December 31, 1996 adjusted for subsequently paid premiums. Insured depository institutions that were in existence on December 31, 1996 and paid assessments prior to that date (or their successors) are entitled to a one-time credit against future assessments based on their past contributions to the BIF or SAIF. At December 31, 2008, Westfield Bank’s credit was substantially utilized to offset its 2008 deposit insurance assessment.

Pursuant to the Reform Act, the FDIC has determined to maintain the designated reserve ratio at its current 1.25%. The FDIC has also adopted a new risk-based premium system that provides for quarterly assessments based on an insured institution’s ranking in one of four risk categories based on their examination ratings and capital ratios. Under these regulations, all insured depository institutions are placed into one of four risk categories. Westfield Bank is in Risk Category I, the most favorable category. As of January 1, 2009, all insured institutions will pay a base rate assessment of 12 to 50 basis points for the first quarter of 2009 of assessable deposits based on the risk of loss to the DIF posed by the particular institution.

Institutions, such as Westfield Bank, in Risk Category I will be assessed within a range of 12 to 14 basis points for the first quarter of 2009. This is a substantial increase from the base rate assessment of 2 to 4 basis points that was in effect during 2008. The increase in the base rate assessment from 2008 to 2009 is dueinstitution to the financial crises affectingDIF.  The assessment rate may, therefore, change when that level of risk changes.


In February 2011, the bankingFDIC adopted a final rule making certain changes to the deposit insurance assessment system, many of which were made as a result of provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act.  The final rule also revises the assessment rate schedule effective April 1, 2011, and financial markets. For institutions such as Westfield Bank, which do not have a long-term public debt rating,adopts additional rate schedules that will go into effect when the individual riskDIF reserve ratio reaches various milestones.  The final rule changes the deposit insurance assessment system from one that is based on its supervisory ratings and certain financial ratios and other measurements of its financial condition. For institutionsdomestic deposits to one that have a long-term public debt rating, the individual risk assessment is based on its supervisory ratings and its debt rating.

On February 27, 2009, the FDIC issued new rules to take effect April 1, 2009 that will change the way the FDIC differentiates risk and appropriate assessment rates. Base assessment rates set to take effect on April 1, 2009 will range from 12 to 45 basis points, but giving effect to certain risk adjustments in the rule issued by the FDIC on February 27, 2009, assessments may range from 7 to 77.5 basis points.average consolidated total assets minus average tangible equity.  In addition, the rule suspends FDIC also issued an interimdividend payments if the DIF reserve ratio exceeds 1.5 percent but provides for decreasing assessment rates when the DIF reserve ratio reaches certain thresholds.


The rule on February 27, 2009 that will impose an emergency special assessment of 20 basis points in addition to its risk-based assessment. This assessmenttake effect for the quarter beginning April 1, 2011, and will be imposed on June 30, 2009 and collected onreflected in the invoices for assessments due September 30, 2009.

2011.



35




Due to the full utilization of the Bank’s credit and the systemic increase in deposit insurance assessments, Westfield Bank will be subject to increased deposit premium expenses in future periods.


In addition, all institutions with deposits insured by the FDIC are required to pay assessments to fund interest payments on bonds issued by the Financing Corporation (“FICO”), an agency of the Federal government established to recapitalize the predecessor to the Savings Association Insurance Fund. The FICO assessment rate for 2008 is approximately .0110% of insured deposits. These assessments will continue until the Financing CorporationFICO bonds mature in 2017.

  The FDIC’s FICO assessment authority is separate from its authority to assess risk-based premiums for deposit insurance.  The FICO assessment rate is adjusted quarterly to reflect changes in the assessment bases of the fund and is not risk-based by institution.  The FICO assessment rate for the first quarter of 2011, due December 30, 2010, was 0.0102% of insured deposits.


Federal Home Loan Bank System.  WestfieldThe Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (the “FHLBB”(“FHLBB”), which is one of the regional Federal Home Loan Banks composingcomprising the Federal Home Loan Bank System.  Each Federal Home Loan Bank serves as a central credit facility primarily for its member institutions.  WestfieldThe Bank, as a member of the FHLBB, is required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in the FHLBB.  While the required percentages of stock ownership are subject to change by the FHLBB, Westfieldthe Bank was in compliance with this requirement with an investment in FHLBB stock at December 31, 20082010 of $8.2million.$12.0 million.  Any advances from a Federal Home Loan Bank must be secured by specified types of collateral, and all long-term advances may be obtained only for the purpose of providing funds for residential housing finance.  InIf there are any developments that cause the past, Westfield Bank has received dividends on its Federal Home Loan Bank stock. The average dividend yield for fiscal 2008value of our stock investment in the FHLBB to become impaired, we would be required to write down the value of our investment, which in turn could affect our net income and 2007 was 3.4% and 5.8%, respectively.shareholders’ equity. On January 28, 2009,February 22, 2011, the FHLBB notified its members that it would be paying a fourth quarter dividend and that it anticipates paying modest cash dividends through 2011.  FHLBB had previously suspended payment of its focusdividends on preserving capital in response to the ongoing market volatility. That letter outlined that actions taken by the FHLBB included an excess stock repurchase moratorium, an increased retained earnings target, and suspension of its quarterly dividend payment. ThereJanuary 28, 2009.  However, there can be no guarantee of future dividends.


Federal Reserve System. Westfield  The Bank is subject to certain provisions of the Federal Reserve Act and the Federal Reserve Board’s regulations, such as those under which depository institutions may be required to maintain non-interest-earning reserves against their deposit accounts and certain other liabilities.  Currently, reserves must be maintained against transaction accounts (primarily NOW and regular checking accounts).  The Federal Reserve
23

Board’s regulations currently require reserves equal to 3% on transaction account balances over $10.3 million and up to $44.4 million, plus 10% on the excess over $44.4 million. These requirements are subject to adjustment annually by the Federal Reserve Board. Because required reserves must be maintained in the form of vault cash or in a noninterest bearing account at a Federal Reserve Bank, the effect of the reserve requirement is to reduce the amount of the institution’s interest-earnin ginterest-earning assets. WestfieldThe Bank is in compliance with the foregoing reserve requirements.  On October 9, 2008, the Federal Reserve Banks began paying interest on reserve balances. The balances maintained to meet the reserve requirements imposed by the Federal Reserve Board may be used to satisfy liquidity requirements imposed by the Office of Thrift Supervision.  Federal Home Loan Bank System members are also authorized to borrow from the Federal Reserve Board discount window, but Federal Reserve Board regulations require such institutions to exhaust all Federal Home Loan Bank sources before borrowing from the Federal Reserve Board.




36




Prohibitions Against Tying Arrangements.  Federal savings associations are subject to prohibitions on certain tying arrangements.  A savings association is prohibited, subject to some exceptions, from extending credit or offering any other service, or fixing or varying the consideration for such extension of credit or service, on the condition that the customer obtain some additional service from the institution or its affiliates or not obtain credit or services from a competitor of the institution.


The Bank Secrecy Act. Westfield Bank and Westfield Financial  We are subject to the Bank Secrecy Act, as amended by the USA PATRIOT Act, which gives the federal government powers to address money laundering and terrorist threats through enhanced domestic security measures, expanded surveillance powers, and mandatory transaction reporting obligations.  By way ofFor example, the Bank Secrecy Act imposes an affirmative obligation on Westfieldthe Bank to report currency transactions that exceed certain thresholds and to report other transactions determined to be suspicious.


Title III of the USA PATRIOT Act takes measures intended to encourage information sharing among financial institutions, bank regulatory agencies and law enforcement bodies.  Further, certain provisions of Title III impose affirmative obligations on a broad range of financial institutions, including banks, thrifts, brokers, dealers, credit unions, money transfer agents and parties registered under the Commodity Exchange Act.  Among other requirements,provisions, the USA PATRIOT Act imposesand the following obligations on financial institutions:


financial institutions must establish anti-money laundering programs that include, at minimum: (i) internal policies, procedures,related regulations of the OTS and controls, (ii) specific designationthe United States Department of an anti-money laundering compliance officer, (iii) ongoing employee training programs, and (iv) an independent audit function to test the anti-money laundering program;

financial institutions must establish and meet minimum standards for customer due diligence, identification and verification;

financial institutions that establish, maintain, administer, or manage private banking accounts or correspondent accountsTreasury require savings banks operating in the United States for non-United States persons or their representatives (including foreign individuals visitingto supplement and enhance the United States) must establish appropriate, specific, and, where necessary, enhancedanti-money laundering compliance programs, due diligence policies procedures, and controls designed to detect and report money laundering through those accounts;

financial institutions are prohibited from establishing, maintaining, administering or managing correspondent accounts for foreign shell banks (foreign banks that do not have a physical presence in any country), and are subject to certain recordkeeping obligations with respect to correspondent accounts of foreign banks; and

bank regulators are directed to consider a depository institution’s or holding company’s effectiveness in combating money laundering when ruling on Federal Reserverequired by the Bank Secrecy Act and Bank Merger Act applications.



37




Office of Foreign AssetAssets Control. Westfield Bank regulations to ensure the detection and reporting of money laundering.


Holding Company Regulation

Federal Reserve Board Regulation.  As of July 21, 2011, Westfield Financial are, like all United Stateswill be regulated by the Federal Reserve Board rather than the OTS, as the OTS will be abolished on that date pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act.  On that date, the powers of the OTS as to thrift holding companies will be transferred to the Federal Reserve Board, and individuals, prohibited from transacting business with certain individuals and entities named onto the Office of Foreign Asset Control’s list of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons. FailureOCC as to comply may result in fines and other penalties. The Office of Foreign Asset Control has issued guidance directed at financial institutions in which it asserts that it may, in its discretion, examine institutions determinedthrifts.  Until July 21, 2011, Westfield Financial will continue to be high-risk or to be lacking in their efforts to comply with these prohibitions.

regulated by the OTS.


Holding Company Regulation


Activities Restrictions Applicable to Westfield Financial.  Under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Westfield Financial is prohibited from engaging in or acquiring an entity engaged in non-financial activities.  As a result, Westfield Financial’s activities are restricted to:


furnishing or performing management services for a savings institution subsidiary of such holding company;


conducting an insurance agency or escrow business;


holding, managing, or liquidating assets owned or acquired from a savings association subsidiary of such company;


holding or managing properties used or occupied by a savings association subsidiary of such company;


acting as trustee under a deed of trust;


any other activity (i) that the Federal Reserve Board, by regulation, has determined to be permissible for bank holding companies under Section 4(c) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, unless the Director of the Office of Thrift Supervision, by regulation, prohibits or limits any such activity for savings and loan holding companies, or (ii) in which multiple savings and loan holding companies were authorized by regulation to directly engage in on March 5, 1987;


purchasing, holding, or disposing of stock acquired in connection with a qualified stock issuance if the purchase of such stock by such holding company is approved by the Director of the Office of Thrift Supervision; and


any activity permissible for financial holding companies under Section 4(k) of the Bank Holding Company Act.




38




Permissible activities which are deemed to be financial in nature or incidental thereto under Section 4(k) of the Bank Holding Company Act include:


lending, exchanging, transferring, investing for others, or safeguarding money or securities;


insurance activities or providing and issuing annuities, and acting as principal, agent, or broker;


financial, investment, or economic advisory services;


issuing or selling instruments representing interests in pools of assets that a bank is permitted to hold directly;


underwriting, dealing in, or making a market in securities;


activities previously determined by the Federal Reserve Board to be closely related to banking;


activities that bank holding companies are permitted to engage in outside of the U.S.; and


portfolio investments made by an insurance company.


In addition, we cannot be acquired unless the acquirer is generally engaged solely in financial activities.


Restrictions on Acquisition of Control Applicable to Westfield Financial. The Home Owners’ Loan  Under the federal Change in Bank Control Act, prohibits all savingsa notice must be submitted to the OTS if any person, or persons acting in concert, seeks to acquire control of WSB, as “control” is defined in the OTS’s regulations.  In reviewing a notice, the OTS is required to take into consideration certain statutory factors, including the financial and loan holding companies, including Westfield Financial, from acquiring, directly or indirectly:


control (as defined under the Home Owners’ Loan Act) of another savings association (or a holding company parent) without prior Office of Thrift Supervision approval;


through merger, consolidation, or purchase of assets, another savings association or a holding company thereof, or acquiring all or substantially allmanagerial resources of the assetsacquirer, the competitive effects of such savings association (orthe proposed acquisition and any adverse effect on the DIF.  If a holding company) without prior Officecompany, an individual who owns or controls more than 25% of Thrift Supervision approval; or


controlthe voting shares of any depository institution not insured by the FDIC (except through a merger with and into the holding company’s savings association subsidiary that is approved by the Office of Thrift Supervision).




39




A savings and loan holding company may not acquire asor a separate subsidiarydirector or officer of a savings association that has a principal office outside of the state where the principal office of its subsidiary savings association is located, except:


in the case of certain emergency acquisitions approved by the FDIC;


if such holding company controls a savings association subsidiary that operated a home or branch office in such additional state as of March 5, 1987; or


if the laws of the state in which the savings association to be acquired is located specifically authorize a savings association chartered by that state to be acquired by a savings association chartered by the state where the acquiring savings association or savings and loan holding company is located or by a holding company that controls such a state-chartered association.


Federal Securities Laws. Westfield Financial’s common stock is registered withseeks to acquire control of us, an application for approval must be submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission under Section 12(b)OTS instead of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Westfield Financial is subject to information, proxy solicitation, insider trading restrictions, and other requirements undernotice described above.  In reviewing an application, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


The Sarbanes-Oxley Act. As a public company, Westfield Financial is subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Act”), which implements a broad range of corporate governance and accounting measures for public companies designed to promote honesty and transparency in corporate America and better protect investors from corporate wrongdoing. In general, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act mandated important new corporate governance and financial reporting requirements intended to enhance the accuracy and transparency of public companies’ reported financial results. It established new responsibilities for corporate chief executive officers, chief financial officers and audit committees in the financial reporting process, and it created a new regulatory body to oversee auditors of public companies. It backed these requirements with new SEC enforcement tools, increased criminal penalties for federal mail, wire and securit ies fraud, and created new criminal penalties for document and record destruction in connection with federal investigations. It also increased the opportunity for more private litigation by lengthening the statute of limitations for securities fraud claims and providing new federal corporate whistleblower protection.


Section 402 of the Act prohibits the extension of personal loans to directors and executive officers of issuers (as defined in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act). The prohibition, however, does not apply to mortgages advanced by an insured depository institution, such as Westfield Bank, that are subject to the insider lending restrictions of Section 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act.


The Act also required that the various securities exchanges, including The Nasdaq Stock Market, prohibit the listing of the stock of an issuer unless that issuer complies with various requirements relating to their committees and the independence of their directors that serve on those committees.




40




Quotation on Nasdaq. Westfield Financial’s common stock is quoted on The Nasdaq Stock Market. In order to maintain such quotation, Westfield Financial is subject to certain corporate governance requirements, including:


a majority of its board must be composed of independent directors;


itOTS is required to have an audit committee composedtake into consideration certain statutory factors in addition to those considered under the Change in Bank Control Act, including the convenience and needs of at least three directors, each of whom is an independent director, as such term is defined by the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules and by the Exchange Act regulations;


its nominating committee and compensation committee must alsocommunity to be composed entirely of independent directors; and

served.

24


each of its audit committee and nominating committee must have a publicly available written charter.


AVAILABLE INFORMATION


We maintain an Internet website atwww.westfieldbank.com. The website contains information about us and our operations.  Through a link to the Investor Relations section of our website, copies of each of our filings with the SEC, on Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports, can be viewed and downloaded free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after the reports and amendments are electronically filed with or

furnished to the SEC.


In addition, copies of any document we file with or furnish to the SEC may be obtained from the SEC at its public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549.  You may obtain information on the operation of the SEC's public reference room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.  You can request copies of these documents, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by writing to the SEC at its principal office at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The SEC maintains an Internet website atwww.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file or furnish such information electronically with the SEC. Our SEC filings are accessible through the Internet at that website.


RISK FACTORS


41




ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS


Our loan portfolio includes loans with a higher risk of loss.Westfield Bank originatesWe originate commercial and industrial loans, commercial real estate loans, consumer loans, and residential mortgage loans primarily within our market area.  In recent years, Westfield Bank haswe have developed and implemented a lending strategy that focuses less on residential real estate lending and more onas well as servicing commercial customers, including increased emphasis on commercial and industrial lending and commercial deposit relationships.  Commercial and industrial loans, commercial real estate loans, and consumer loans may expose a lender to greater credit risk than loans secured by residential real estate because the collateral securing these loans may not be sold as easily as residential real estate.  In addition, commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans may also involve relatively large loan balances to individual borrowers or group sgroups of borrowers.  These loans also have greater credit risk than residential real estate for the following reasons:


Commercial and Industrial Loans.Repayment is generally dependent upon the successful operation of the borrower's business.

  ●
Commercial and Industrial Loans. Repayment is generally dependent upon the successful operation of the borrower's business.

Commercial Real Estate Loans.Repayment is dependent on income being generated in amounts sufficient to cover operating expenses and debt service.

  ●
Commercial Real Estate Loans. Repayment is dependent on income being generated in amounts sufficient to cover operating expenses and debt service.

Consumer Loans.Consumer loans are collateralized, if at all, with assets that may not provide an adequate source of payment of the loan due to depreciation, damage or loss.

  ●
Consumer Loans. Consumer loans are collateralized, if at all, with assets that may not provide an adequate source of payment of the loan due to depreciation, damage or loss.

Due to the ongoing economic recession, the real estate market and local economy are continuing to deteriorate which has adversely affected the value of the properties securing the loans or revenues from the borrower’s business, thereby increasing the risk of non-performing loans. The decreases in real estate values have adversely affected the value of property used as collateral for our commercial real estate loans.  The continued deterioration in the economy may also have a negative effect on the ability of our commercial borrowers to make timely repayments of their loans, which could have an adverse impact on our earnings. In addition, if poor economic conditions continue to result in decreased demand for loans, our profits may decrease because our alternative investments may earn less income for us than loans.


If our allowance for loan losses is not sufficient to cover actual loan losses, our earnings could decrease.  Our loan customers may not repay their loans according to their terms and the collateral securing the payment of these loans may be insufficient to pay any remaining loan balance.  We therefore may experience significant loan losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.




42




Material additions to our allowance for loan losses also would materially decrease our net income, and the charge-off of loans may cause us to increase the allowance.  We make various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of our loan portfolio, including the creditworthiness of our borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment of many of our loans.  We rely on our loan quality reviews, our experience and our evaluation of economic conditions, among other factors, in determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses.  If our assumptions prove to be incorrect, our allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to cover losses inherent in our loan portfolio, resulting in additions to our allowance.

25


If dividends are not paid on our investment in the FHLBB, or if our investment is classified as other-than-temporarily impaired, our earnings and/or shareholders’ equity could decrease. We own common stock of the FHLBB to qualify for membership in the Federal Home Loan Bank System and to be eligible to borrow funds under the FHLBB’s advance program. There is no market for our FHLBB common stock. After suspending all dividend payment in 2009, on February 22, 2011, the FHLBB reinstated the payment of dividends on its common stock.  There can be no assurance that such dividends will be declared in the future. Further, there can be no assurance that the impact of recent or future legislation on the Federal Home Loan Banks also will not cause a decrease in the value of the FHLBB stock held by us.

It is possible that the capitalization of a Federal Home Loan Bank, including the FHLBB, could be substantially diminished or reduced to zero. Consequently, we believe that there is a risk that our investment in FHLBB common stock could be deemed other-than-temporarily impaired at some time in the future, and if this occurs, it would cause our earnings and shareholders’ equity to decrease by the after-tax amount of the impairment charge.

Changes in interest rates could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.  Our profitability, like that of most financial institutions, depends substantially on our net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income earned on our interest-earning assets and the interest expense paid on our interest-bearing liabilities.  Increases in interest rates may decrease loan demand and make it more difficult for borrowers to repay adjustable rate loans.  In addition, as market interest rates rise, we will have competitive pressures to increase the rates we pay on deposits, which will result in a decrease of our net interest income.

We also are subject to reinvestment risk associated with changes in interest rates.  Changes in interest rates may affect the average life of loans and mortgage-related securities.  Decreases in interest rates can result in increased prepayments of loans and mortgage-related securities as borrowers refinance to reduce borrowing costs.  Under these circumstances, we are subject to reinvestment risk to the extent that we are unable to reinvest the cash received from such prepayments at rates that are comparable to the rates on existing loans and securities.


Changes in the national and local economy may affect our future growth possibilities.Our current market area is principally located in Hampden County, Massachusetts.  Our future growth opportunities depend on the growth and stability of our regional economy and our ability to expand our market area.  The continued downturn in our local economy may limit funds available for deposit and may negatively affect our borrowers’ ability to repay their loans on a timely basis, both of which could have an impact on our profitability.


Dramatic declines in the housing market, with decreasing home prices and increasing delinquencies and foreclosures, have negatively impacted the credit performance of mortgage loans and resulted in significant write-downs of assets by many financial institutions. In addition, the values of real estate collateral supporting many loans have declined and may continue to decline. The ongoing economic recession, reduced availability of commercial credit and increasing unemployment have negatively impacted the credit performance of commercial and consumer credit, resulting in additional write-downs. Concerns over the stability of the financial markets and the economy have resulted in decreased lending by financial institutions to their customers and to each other. This market turmoil and tightening of credit has led to increased commercial and consumer delinquencies, lack of customer confidence, increased market volatility and widespread red uctionreduction in general business activity. We do not believe these difficult conditions are likely to improve in the near future. A worsening of these conditions would likely exacerbate the adverse effects of these difficult market and economic conditions on us, our customers and the other financial institutions in our market. As a result, we may experience increases in foreclosures, delinquencies and customer bankruptcies, as well as more restricted access to funds and decrease in our stock price.



43




We depend on our executive officers and key personnel to continue the implementation of our long-term business strategy and could be harmed by the loss of their services.  We believe that our continued growth and future success will depend in large part upon the skills of our management team.  The competition for qualified personnel in the financial services industry is intense, and the loss of our key personnel or an inability to continue to attract, retain and motivate key personnel could adversely affect our business.  We cannot assure you that we will be able to retain our existing key personnel or attract additional qualified personnel.  We have employment agreements with our Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer, and Executive Vice President and General Counsel and change of control agreements with several other senior executive officers, and the loss of the services of one or more of our executive officers and key personnel could impair our ability to c ontinuecontinue to develop our business strategy.

26


We operate in a highly regulated environment, and changes in laws and regulations to which we are subject may adversely affect our results of operations. Westfield  The Bank is subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination by the Office of Thrift Supervision,OTS, as its chartering authority, and by the FDIC as the insurer of its deposits up to certain limits.  In addition, the Office of Thrift SupervisionOTS regulates and oversees Westfield Financial.  We also belong to the Federal Home Loan Bank System and, as a member of such system, we are subject to certain limited regulations promulgated by the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston.  This regulation and supervision limits the activities in which we may engage.  The purpose of regulation and supervision is primarily to protect our depositors and borrowers and, in the case of FDIC regulation, the FDIC’s insurance fund.  Regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in the exercise of their supervisory and enforcement powers.  They may, among other things, impose restrictions on the operation of a banking institution, the classification of assets by such institution and such institution’s allowance for loan losses.  Regulatory and law enforcement authorities also have wide discretion and extensive enforcement powers under various consumer protection and civil rights laws, including the Truth-in-Lending Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act, and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act.


As discussed above under the caption “Regulation,” pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, the OTS will be abolished as of July 21, 2011 and its powers and duties will be transferred to the OCC as to the Bank and to the Federal Reserve Board as to Westfield Financial.  Therefore, Westfield Financial and the Bank will no longer be regulated by the OTS, but by the Federal Reserve Board and the OCC, respectively.  We cannot predict, at this time, what effect on our operations will results from this change in supervision.  We will have to devote increased resources to ensuring compliance with this new supervisory regime, including compliance with any new requirements the Federal Reserve Board and the OCC may impose.  The Dodd-Frank Act also creates a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) as an independent bureau of the Federal Reserve Board, which will begin operations on July 21, 2011.  The CFPB will have broad authority to write regulations regarding consumer financial products and services, and certain examination and enforcement powers.

We will have to devote resources to evaluating any regulations proposed by the CFPB and to complying with any such regulations after they are finalized.

In addition, financial institutions have been the subject of significant legislative and regulatory changes and willcould continue to be the subject of further significant legislation or regulation in the future, none of which is within our control. These changes as well as any future change in the laws or regulations applicable to us, or in banking regulators’ supervisory policies or examination procedures, whether by the Office of Thrift Supervision,OTS, the FDIC, other state or federal regulators, or the United States Congress could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, the cost and burden of compliance, over time, could significantly increase and adversely affect our ability to operate profitably.




44




Competition in our primary market area may reduce our ability to attract and retain deposits and originate loans.We operate in a competitive market for both attracting deposits, which is our primary source of funds, and originating loans.  Historically, our most direct competition for deposits has come from savings and commercial banks.  Our competition for loans comes principally from commercial banks, savings institutions, mortgage banking firms, credit unions, finance companies, mutual funds, insurance companies and brokerage and investment banking firms.  We also face additional competition from internet-based institutions, brokerage firms and insurance companies.  Competition for loan originations and deposits may limit our future growth and earnings prospects.

Recent legislative


Compliance with the recently enacted Dodd-Frank Act will alter the regulatory regime to which we are subject, and regulatory initiativesmay increase our costs of operations and adversely impact our business. On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Act into law. The Dodd-Frank Act represents a significant overhaul of many aspects of the regulation of the financial-services industry. Among other things, the Dodd-Frank Act creates a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau as an independent bureau of the Federal Reserve, tightens capital standards, imposes clearing and margining requirements on many derivatives activities, and generally increases oversight and regulation of financial institutions and financial activities. It requires depository institution holding companies with assets greater than $500 million to address these difficult market and economic conditions may not stabilize the U.S. banking system.The U.S. Congress enacted the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (the “EESA”) in responsebe subject to the impactsame capital requirements as insured depository institutions, meaning, for instance, that such holding companies will no longer be able to count trust preferred securities issued on or after May 19, 2010 as Tier 1 capital.
As discussed above, the Dodd-Frank Act abolishes the OTS as of July 21, 2011, and transfers its powers and duties to the OCC and Federal Reserve Board.  As of that date, the CFPB will also come into existence.   We will have to apply resources to prepare for our new supervisory regime under these regulators.  We cannot predict what new requirements these regulators may impose that will affect us.
27

In addition to the self-implementing provisions of the volatilitystatute, the Dodd-Frank Act calls for over 200 administrative rulemakings by various federal agencies to implement various parts of the legislation.  While some rules have been finalized and/or issued in proposed form, many have yet to be proposed.  It is impossible to predict when all such additional rules will be issued or finalized, and disruptionwhat the content of such rules will be. We will have to apply resources to ensure that we are in compliance with all applicable provisions of the capitalDodd-Frank Act and credit marketsany implementing rules, which may increase our costs of operations and adversely impact our earnings.

The Dodd-Frank Act and any implementing rules that are ultimately issued could have adverse implications on the financial sector. The U.S. Department ofindustry, the Treasury (the “Treasury”)competitive environment, and the federal banking regulators are implementing a number of programs under this legislation that are intendedour ability to address these conditionsconduct business.

Increases in FDIC deposit insurance premiums and the asset quality, capital and liquidity issues they have caused for certain financial institutions and to improve the general availability of credit for consumers and businesses. In addition, the U.S. Congress recently enacted the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (“ARRA”) in an effort to save and create jobs, stimulate t he U.S. economy and promote long-term growth and stability. There can be no assurance that EESA, ARRA or the programs that are implemented under them will achieve their intended purposes. The failure of EESA, ARRA or the programs that are implemented under them to achieve their intended purposes could result in a continuation or worsening of current economic and market conditions, and thisassessments could adversely affect our financial condition, resultscondition.  FDIC insurance premiums increased substantially in 2009 and we expect to continue to pay high FDIC premiums in the future. FDIC insured bank failures have significantly depleted the insurance fund of operations, and/or the trading priceFDIC and reduced the ratio of our common stock.

reserves to insured deposits. The FDIC adopted a revised risk-based deposit insurance premiums have increased andassessment schedule on February 27, 2009, which raised deposit insurance premiums. On May 22, 2009, the FDIC also implemented a five basis point special assessment of each insured depository institution’s assets minus Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009, but no more than 10 basis points times the institution’s assessment base for the second quarter of 2009, which was collected on September 30, 2009. Additional special assessments may increase furtherbe imposed by the FDIC for future periods.


In December 2009, the FDIC enacted a proposal that required most FDIC-insured banks to prepay their projected insurance assessments for the years 2010 through 2012.  In December 2009, we advanced approximately $2.5 million of such prepaid assessments.  The actual FDIC insurance expense could be higher if the balance in the future.Underdeposit insurance fund reaches levels that cause the FDIC to implement additional special assessments or take other actions that result in an increase to the amounts paid by banks under the FDIC insurance program.

The Dodd-Frank Act also broadens the base for Federal Deposit Insurance Act,Corporation insurance assessments. Assessments will now be based on the FDIC, absent extraordinary circumstances, must establish and implementaverage consolidated total assets less tangible equity capital of a plan to restore the deposit insurance reserve ratio to 1.15% of insured deposits, over a five-year period, at any time that the reserve ratio falls below 1.15%. The FDIC’s reserve ratio has continued to decline due to costs associated with bank failures and FDIC-assisted transactions, and the reserve ratio is expected to continue to decline due to future bank failures and FDIC-assisted transactions.

Pursuant to the EESA, the maximum deposit insurance amount has been increased from $100,000 to $250,000 until December 31, 2009, and certain types of deposit accounts will have unlimited deposit insurance coverage through that date. On October 13, 2008, the FDIC established a Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program under which the FDIC will fully guarantee all non-interest-bearing transaction accounts and all senior unsecured debt of any insured depository institutions or their qualified holding companies that did not opt out of the program issued between October 14, 2008 and June 30, 2009. Senior unsecured debt includes federal funds purchased and certificates of deposit outstanding to the credit of the bank with a maturity of 30 days or greater. These increases have increased the aggregate amount of deposits that the FDIC insures and thus have exposed the FDIC’s deposit insurance fund to potentially gre ater losses. Westfield Bank will be subject to increased deposit premium expenses in 2009 and futures years which may have an adverse impact on our results of operations.

financial institution.



45




ITEM 1B.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.



46




UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
28

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES


Westfield Bank

We currently conducts itsconduct our business through itsour eleven banking offices and sixtwelve off-site ATMs.  As of December 31, 2008,2010, the properties and leasehold improvements owned by us had an aggregate net book value of $12.1$11.6 million.


Location

Ownership

Year
Opened

Year of Lease or
License
Expiration

 

 

 

 

Main Office:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

141 Elm St.
Westfield, MA

Owned

1964

N/A

 

 

 

 

Branch Offices:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

206 Park St.
West Springfield, MA

Owned

1957

N/A

 

 

 

 

655 Main St.
Agawam, MA

Owned

1968

N/A

 

 

 

 

26 Arnold St.
Westfield, MA

Owned

1976

N/A

 

 

 

 

300 Southampton Rd.
Westfield, MA

Owned

1987

N/A

 

 

 

 

462 College Highway
Southwick, MA

Owned

1990

N/A

 

 

 

 

382 North Main St.
E. Longmeadow, MA

Leased

1997

2012

 

 

 

 

1500 Main St.
Springfield, MA

Leased

2006

2016

 

 

 

 

1642 Northampton St.
Holyoke, MA

Owned

2001

N/A

 

 

 

 

1342 Liberty St.
Springfield, MA

Owned

2001

N/A

 

 

 

 

560 East Main St.
Westfield, MA

Leased

2007

2046

 

 

 

 

ATMs:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

337 N. Westfield St.
Feeding Hills, MA

Leased

1988

2013

 

 

 

 

516 Carew St.
Springfield, MA

Tenant at will

2002

N/A

 

 

 

 

1000 State St.
Springfield, MA

Tenant at will

2003

N/A

 

 

 

 

788 Memorial Ave.
West Springfield, MA

Leased

2006

2016

 

 

 

 

2620 Westfield St.
West Springfield, MA

Leased

2006

2020

 

 

 

 

98 Southwick Rd.
Westfield, MA

Leased

2006

2021


LocationOwnership  Year OpenedYear of Lease
or License
Expiration
    
Main Office:   
141 Elm St.Owned1964N/A
Westfield, MA   
    
Branch Offices:   
206 Park St.Owned1957N/A
West Springfield, MA   
    
655 Main St.Owned1968N/A
Agawam, MA   
    
26 Arnold St.Owned1976N/A
Westfield, MA   
    
300 Southampton Rd.Owned1987N/A
Westfield, MA   
    
462 College HighwayOwned1990N/A
Southwick, MA   
    
382 North Main St.Leased19972012
E. Longmeadow, MA   
    
1500 Main St.Leased20062016
Springfield, MA   
    
1642 Northampton St.Owned2001N/A
Holyoke, MA   
    
560 East Main St.Leased20072046
Westfield, MA   
    
241 South Westfield St.Leased20092038
Feeding Hill, MA   
29

ATMs:   
337 N. Westfield St.Leased19882013
Feeding Hills, MA   
    
516 Carew St.Tenant at will2002N/A
Springfield, MA   
    
1000 State St.Tenant at will2003N/A
Springfield, MA   
    
788 Memorial Ave.Leased20062016
West Springfield, MA   
    
2620 Westfield St.Leased20062020
West Springfield, MA   
    
98 Southwick Rd.Leased20062021
Westfield, MA   
    
115 West Silver St.Tenant at will2005N/A
Westfield, MA   
    
1342 Liberty St.Owned2001N/A
Springfield, MA   
    
98 Lower Westfield Rd.Leased20102020
Holyoke, MA   
    
Westfield State University   
577 Western Ave.   
Westfield, MA   
Woodward CenterLeased20102015
Wilson HallLeased20102015
Ely HallLeased20102015


47




ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS


Westfield Financial is

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are not involved in any pending legal proceeding other than routine legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business.  In the opinion of management, no legal proceedings will have a material effect on Westfield Financial’sour consolidated financial position or results of operations.

[REMOVED AND RESERVED]
30


ITEM 4.

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS


None.




48




PART II


ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES


Effective on August 21, 2007, Westfield Financial switched the listing of its

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common stock from the American Stock Exchange tois currently listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market and retainedunder the symbol “WFD”.“WFD.”  Prior to August 21, 2007, we were listed on the American Stock Exchange.  At December 31, 2008,2010, there were 31,307,88128,166,419 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, and there were approximately 5,1974,785 shareholders of record.


On January 3, 2007, Westfield Financial completed its stock offering in connection with the second step conversion of Westfield Mutual Holding Company. As part of the conversion, New Westfield Financial, Inc. succeeded Westfield Financial as the stock holding company of Westfield Bank, and Westfield Mutual Holding Company was dissolved. In the stock offering, a total of 18,400,000 shares representing Westfield Mutual Holding Company’s ownership interest in Westfield Financial were sold by New Westfield Financial in a subscription offering, community offering and syndicated offering. In addition, each outstanding share of Westfield Financial as of January 3, 2007 was exchanged for 3.28138 new shares of New Westfield Financial common stock. New Westfield Financial, Inc. changed its name to Westfield Financial, Inc. effective January 3, 2007.


The table below shows the high and low sales price during the periods indicated as well as dividends declared per share. The information set forth in the table below was provided by the American Stock Exchange and NASDAQ.


 

 

Price Per Share

 

Cash
Dividends
Declared

For the Year Ended December 31, 2008

 

High

 

Low

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 2008

 

$        10.36

 

$        8.89

 

$        0.30

Third Quarter ended September 30, 2008

 

 11.30

 

 8.76

 

 0.05

Second Quarter ended June 30, 2008

 

 9.86

 

 9.05

 

 0.20

First Quarter ended March 31, 2008

 

 10.53

 

 8.95

 

 0.05

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Price Per Share

 

Cash
Dividends
Declared

For the Year Ended December 31, 2007

 

High

 

Low

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 2007

 

$        10.18

 

$        9.49

 

$        0.25

Third Quarter ended September 30, 2007

 

 10.25

 

 8.73

 

 0.05

Second Quarter ended June 30, 2007

 

 10.83

 

 9.97

 

 0.05

First Quarter ended March 31, 2007

 

 11.02

 

 10.16

 

 0.05




49




A quarterly

  Price Per Share  Cash
Dividends
Declared
 
2010 High ($)  Low ($)  ($) 
Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 2010  9.37   7.70   0.21*
Third Quarter ended September 30, 2010  8.84   7.33   0.06 
Second Quarter ended June 30, 2010  10.12   7.95   0.20*
First Quarter ended March 31, 2010  9.25   7.98   0.05 
  Price Per Share  Cash
Dividends
Declared
 
2009 High ($)  Low ($)  ($) 
Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 2009  8.50   7.85   0.20*
Third Quarter ended September 30, 2009  9.82   8.43   0.05 
Second Quarter ended June 30, 2009  9.86   8.62   0.20*
First Quarter ended March 31, 2009  10.34   8.27   0.05 
*Includes a special cash dividend of $0.05 per share was declared on January 22, April 22, July 22, and October 28, 2008 by$0.15 in addition to the Board of Directors. In addition, the Board of Directors declared specialregular quarterly cash dividends of $0.15 per share and $0.25 per share on April 22, 2008 and October 28, 2008, respectively. dividend.
The continued payment of dividends depends upon our debt and equity structure, earnings, financial condition, need for capital in connection with possible future acquisitions and other factors, including economic conditions, regulatory restrictions and tax considerations. Westfield FinancialWe cannot guarantee the payment of dividends or that, if paid, that dividends will not be reduced or eliminated in the future.


The only funds available for the payment of dividends on theour capital stock of Westfield Financial will be cash and cash equivalents held by Westfield Financial,us, dividends paid by Westfieldto us by the Bank, to Westfield Financial, and borrowings.  WestfieldThe Bank will be prohibited from paying cash dividends to Westfield Financialus to the extent that any such payment would reduce Westfieldthe Bank’s capital below required capital levels or would impair the liquidation account to be established for the benefit of Westfieldthe Bank’s eligible account holders and supplemental eligible account holders at the time of the reorganization and stock offering.


There were no sales by Westfield Financialus of unregistered securities during the year ended December 31, 2008.

2010.

31

The following table sets forth information with respect to purchases made by us of our common stock during the three months ended December 31, 2010.


50




Period Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
  Average Price
Paid per
Share ($)
  
Total Number of
Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Programs
  
Maximum Number
of Shares that May
Yet Be Purchased
Under the Program
(1)
 
             
October 1 - 31, 2010  61,882(2)  7.94   33,947   1,666,031 
                 
November 1 - 30, 2010  111,844   8.01   111,844   1,554,187 
                 
December 1 - 31, 2010  1,671   8.25   1,671   1,552,516 
                 
Total  175,397   7.99   147,462   1,552,516 
              
(1)  On May 25, 2010, the Board of Directors voted to authorize the commencement of a repurchase program, authorizing the repurchase of 2,924,367 shares, or ten percent of its outstanding shares of common stock.
(2)  In October 2010, we repurchased 27,935 shares from certain executives as repayment of their tax obligations for shares of restricted stock that vested on October 20, 2010 under our 2002 and 2007 Recognition and Retention Plans.  These repurchases were reported by each reporting person on October 20, 2010.
32

Performance Graph


The following graph compares Westfield Financial, Inc.’sour total cumulative shareholder return by an investor who invested $100.00 on December 31, 20032005 to December 31, 2008,2010, to the total return by an investor who invested $100.00 in each of the Russell 2000 Index and the Nasdaq Bank Index for the same period.



COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN

Among Westfield Financial, Inc., The Russell 2000 Index and the

NASDAQ Bank Index




 

Period Ending

Index

12/31/03

12/31/04

12/31/05

12/31/06

12/31/07

12/31/08

Westfield Financial, Inc.

100.00

110.16

106.29

158.82

152.10

171.81

Russell 2000

100.00

118.33

123.72

146.44

144.15

95.44

NASDAQ Bank

100.00

110.99

106.18

117.87

91.85

69.88




51




     Period Ending 
Index 12/31/05  12/31/06  12/31/07  12/31/08  12/31/09  12/31/10 
Westfield Financial, Inc.  100.00   149.42   143.10   161.64   136.74   163.05 
Russell 2000  100.00   118.37   116.51   77.15   98.11   124.46 
NASDAQ Bank  100.00   113.82   91.16   71.52   59.87   68.34 
33

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The summary information presented below at or for each of the years presented is derived in part from theour consolidated financial statements of Westfield Financial.statements.  The following information is only a summary, and you should read it in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes beginning on page F-1.

 

At December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

(In thousands)

Selected Financial Condition Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

$1,109,056

 

$1,039,784

 

$   996,829

 

$   805,095

 

$   796,903

Loans, net(1)

 472,135

 

 414,902

 

 385,184

 

 378,837

 

 368,601

Securities available for sale

 24,396

 

 38,051

 

 41,687

 

 28,321

 

 14,968

Securities held to maturity

 79,303

 

 104,025

 

 77,299

 

 73,323

 

 71,298

Mortgage-backed securities available for sale

 233,747

 

 206,178

 

 126,942

 

 101,138

 

 73,316

Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity

 168,332

 

 174,594

 

 163,093

 

 152,127

 

 175,302

Deposits

 588,029

 

 602,676

 

 627,466

 

 623,045

 

 612,621

Short-term borrowings

 49,824

 

 32,268

 

 17,919

 

 14,441

 

 14,615

Long-term debt

 173,300

 

 105,000

 

 55,000

 

 45,000

 

 45,000

Total stockholders’ equity (2)

 259,919

 

 286,532

 

 289,408

 

 115,842

 

 118,051

Allowance for loan losses

 8,796

 

 5,726

 

 5,437

 

 5,422

 

 5,277

Nonperforming loans

 8,805

 

 1,202

 

 1,028

 

 1,919

 

 2,171

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Years Ended

 

December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

(In thousands, except per share data)

Selected Operating Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest and dividend income

$     54,056

 

$     53,584

 

$     42,435

 

$     37,306

 

$     34,428

Interest expense

 22,304

 

 23,408

 

 19,551

 

 13,597

 

 10,913

Net interest and dividend income

 31,752

 

 30,176

 

 22,884

 

 23,709

 

 23,515

Provision for loan losses

 3,453

 

 400

 

 390

 

 465

 

 750

Net interest and dividend income after

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  provision for loan losses

 28,299

 

 29,776

 

 22,494

 

 23,244

 

 22,765

Total noninterest income

 3,520

 

 4,561

 

 3,073

 

 3,372

 

 3,896

Total noninterest expense

 23,333

 

 21,825

 

 19,390

 

 18,464

 

 17,776

Income before income taxes

 8,486

 

 12,512

 

 6,177

 

 8,152

 

 8,885

Income taxes

 1,795

 

 3,812

 

 1,523

 

 1,933

 

 2,562

Net income

$       6,691

 

$       8,700

 

$       4,654

 

$       6,219

 

$       6,323

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per share

$         0.23

 

$         0.29

 

$         0.15

 

$         0.20

 

$         0.20

Diluted earnings per share

$         0.23

 

$         0.29

 

$         0.15

 

$         0.20

 

$         0.20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends per share paid (3)

$         0.60

 

$         0.40

 

$         0.32

 

$         0.27

 

$         0.10

(1)

Loans are shown net of deferred loan costs, allowance for loan losses and unadvanced loan funds.

(2)

Stockholders’ equity includes $171.7 million in capital from the net proceeds raised in the stock offering. Westfield Financial completed its second step stock offering on January 3, 2007. Consequently, the proceeds were recognized by Westfield Financial and reported in its balance sheet as of December 31, 2006. Proceeds, net of stock issuance costs, received directly by Westfield Financial or held by the underwriter for the convenience of Westfield Financial were recorded by increasing cash, the capital stock, and the paid-in capital accounts.

(3)

Per share amounts related to periods prior to the date of completion of the conversion (January 3, 2007) have been restated to give retroactive recognition to the exchange ratio applied in the conversion.

  At December 31, 
  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006 
  (In thousands) 
Selected Financial Condition Data:               
Total assets $1,239,489  $1,191,410  $1,109,056  $1,039,784  $996,829 
Loans, net (1)
  502,392   469,149   472,135   414,902   385,184 
Securities available for sale  644,139   319,121   258,143   244,229   168,629 
Securities held to maturity (2)
  -   295,011   247,635   278,619   240,392 
Deposits  700,335   647,975   588,029   602,676   627,466 
Short-term borrowings  62,937   74,499   49,824   32,268   17,919 
Long-term debt  238,151   213,845   173,300   105,000   55,000 
Total stockholders’ equity  221,245   247,299   259,919   286,532   289,408 
Allowance for loan losses  6,934   7,645   8,796   5,726   5,437 
Nonperforming loans  3,204   5,470   8,805   1,202   1,028 
                     
  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006 
  (In thousands, except per share data) 
Selected Operating Data:               
Interest and dividend income $46,147  $52,530  $54,056  $53,584  $42,435 
Interest expense  16,765   20,022   22,304   23,408   19,551 
Net interest and dividend income  29,382   32,508   31,752   30,176   22,884 
Provision for loan losses  8,923   3,900   3,453   400   390 
Net interest and dividend income after
provision for loan losses
  20,459   28,608   28,299   29,776   22,494 
Total noninterest income  7,390   3,218   3,579   4,609   3,123 
Total noninterest expense  24,809   25,100   23,392   21,873   19,440 
Income before income taxes  3,040   6,726   8,486   12,512   6,177 
Income taxes  34   1,267   1,795   3,812   1,523 
Net income $3,006  $5,459  $6,691  $8,700  $4,654 
                     
Basic earnings per share (3)
 $0.11  $0.19  $0.22  $0.29  $0.15 
Diluted earnings per share (3)
 $0.11  $0.18  $0.22  $0.28  $0.15 
                     
Dividends per share paid (3)
 $0.52  $0.50  $0.60  $0.40  $0.32 
_________________________________
(1)      Loans are shown net of deferred loan costs, allowance for loan losses and unadvanced loan funds.
(2)      In August 2010, we transferred all of our held-to-maturity securities to the available-for-sale category.  We determined that we no longer had the positive intent to hold our securities classified as held-to-maturity for an indefinite period of time because of our desire to have more flexibility in managing the investment portfolio.  The securities transferred had a total amortized cost of $287.1 million, fair value of $299.7 million and a net unrealized gain of $12.6 million, which was recorded as other comprehensive income at the time of transfer.
(3)      Per share amounts related to periods prior to the date of completion of the conversion (January 3, 2007) have been restated to give retroactive recognition to the exchange ratio applied in the conversion.
34


  At or for the Years Ended December 31, 
  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006 
                
Selected Financial Ratios and               
Other Data(1)
               
Performance Ratios:               
Return on average assets  0.25%  0.47%  0.63%  0.86%  0.56%
Return on average equity  1.25   2.12   2.43   3.00   3.99 
Average equity to average assets  19.63   22.16   25.75   28.74   14.08 
Equity to total assets at end of year  17.85   20.76   23.44   27.56   29.03 
Average interest rate spread  2.22   2.41   2.44   2.23   2.61 
Net interest margin (2)
  2.64   3.04   3.23   3.25   3.05 
Average interest-earning assets to average
interest-earning liabilities
  128.51   134.62   135.36   141.05   117.37 
Total noninterest expense to average assets  2.03   2.16   2.18   2.16   2.34 
Efficiency ratio (3)
  75.53   68.49   65.83   64.55   73.68 
Dividend payout ratio  4.73   2.63   2.73   1.38   2.13 
Regulatory Capital Ratios:                    
Total risk-based capital  34.05   38.07   42.56   50.29   29.07 
Tier 1 risk-based capital  33.03   36.94   41.31   49.30   54.38 
Tier 1 leverage capital  18.07   20.92   23.97   27.48   55.39 
Asset Quality Ratios:                    
Nonperforming loans to total loans  0.63   1.15   1.83   0.29   0.26 
Nonperforming assets to total assets  0.28   0.60   0.79   0.12   0.10 
Allowance for loan losses to total loans  1.36   1.60   1.83   1.36   1.39 
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming assets  202   107   100   476   529 
Number of:                    
Banking offices  11   11   11   11   10 
Full-time equivalent employees  180   168   180   177   155 
                     
_________________________________                    
(1) Asset quality ratios and regulatory capital ratios are end of period ratios. 
(2) Net interest margin represents tax-equivalent net interest and dividend income as a percentage of average interest earning assets. 
(3) The efficiency ratio represents the ratio of operating expenses divided by the sum of net interest and dividend income and noninterest income less gain on sale and losses on other than temporary impairment of securities and sale of premises and equipment. 
35

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

52





 

At or for the Years Ended December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selected Financial Ratios and
  Other Data(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Performance Ratios:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Return on average assets

 0.63

%

 

 0.86

%

 

 0.56

%

 

 0.77

%

 

 0.79

%

Return on average equity (2)

 2.43

 

 

 3.00

 

 

 3.99

 

 

 5.27

 

 

 5.24

 

Average equity to average assets (2)

 25.75

 

 

 28.74

 

 

 14.08

 

 

 14.66

 

 

 15.14

 

Equity to total assets at end of year (3)

 23.44

 

 

 27.56

 

 

 29.03

 

 

 14.39

 

 

 14.83

 

Average interest rate spread

 2.44

 

 

 2.23

 

 

 2.61

 

 

 2.89

 

 

 2.94

 

Net interest margin (4)

 3.23

 

 

 3.25

 

 

 3.05

 

 

 3.24

 

 

 3.25

 

Average interest-earning assets to average
    interest-earning liabilities

 135.36

 

 

 141.05

 

 

 117.37

 

 

 119.22

 

 

 121.47

 

Total noninterest expense to
    average assets

 2.18

 

 

 2.16

 

 

 2.34

 

 

 2.29

 

 

 2.24

 

Efficiency ratio (5)

 65.77

 

 

 63.91

 

 

 73.63

 

 

 68.23

 

 

 66.99

 

Dividend payout ratio

 2.61

 

 

 1.38

 

 

 2.13

 

 

 1.35

 

 

 0.50

 

Regulatory Capital Ratios:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total risk-based capital

 42.56

 

 

 50.29

 

 

 29.07

 

 

 14.48

 

 

 14.69

 

Tier 1 risk-based capital

 41.31

 

 

 49.30

 

 

 54.38

 

 

 24.54

 

 

 25.75

 

Tier 1 leverage capital

 23.97

 

 

 27.48

 

 

 55.39

 

 

 25.68

 

 

 26.90

 

Asset Quality Ratios:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nonperforming loans as a percent of
  total loans

 1.83

 

 

 0.29

 

 

 0.26

 

 

 0.50

 

 

 0.58

 

Nonperforming assets as a percent of
  total assets

 0.79

 

 

 0.12

 

 

 0.10

 

 

 0.24

 

 

 0.27

 

Allowance for loan losses as a percent of
  total loans

 1.83

 

 

 1.36

 

 

 1.39

 

 

 1.41

 

 

 1.41

 

Allowance for loan losses as a percent of
  nonperforming assets

 100

 

 

 476

 

 

 529

 

 

 283

 

 

 243

 

Number of:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Banking offices

 11

 

 

 11

 

 

 10

 

 

 10

 

 

 10

 

Full-time equivalent employees

 180

 

 

 177

 

 

 155

 

 

 142

 

 

 144

 


____________________________

(1)

Asset Quality Ratios and Regulatory Capital Ratios are end of period ratios.

(2)

Average equity includes $171.7 million in capital from the net proceeds raised in the stock offering. Westfield Financial completed its second step stock offering on January 3, 2007. Consequently, the proceeds were recognized by Westfield Financial and reported in its balance sheet as of December 31, 2006 and therefore affected the balance of stockholders’ equity for one calendar day. Proceeds, net of stock issuance costs, received directly by Westfield Financial or held by the underwriter for the convenience of Westfield Financial were recorded by increasing cash, the capital stock, and the paid-in capital accounts.

(3)

Stockholders’ equity includes $171.7 million in capital from the net proceeds raised in the stock offering. Westfield Financial completed its second step stock offering on January 3, 2007. Consequently, the proceeds were recognized by Westfield Financial and reported in its balance sheet as of December 31, 2006. Proceeds, net of stock issuance costs, received directly by Westfield Financial or held by the underwriter for the convenience of Westfield Financial were recorded by increasing cash, the capital stock, and the paid-in capital accounts.

(4)

Net interest margin represents tax equivalent net interest and dividend income as a percentage of average interest earning assets.

(5) The efficiency ratio represents the ratio of operating expenses divided by the sum of net interest and dividend income and noninterest income less gain on sale and losses on other than temporary impairment of securities and sale of premises and equipment.



53




ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


Overview.Westfield Financial strives We strive to remain a leader in meeting the financial service needs of the local community and to provide quality service to the individuals and businesses in the market areas that it haswe have served since 1853.  Historically, Westfield Bank haswe have been a community-oriented provider of traditional banking products and services to business organizations and individuals, including products such as residential and commercial real estate loans, consumer loans and a variety of deposit products.  Westfield Bank meetsWe meet the needs of itsour local community through a community-based and service-oriented approach to banking.


On January 3, 2007, Westfield Financial completed its stock offering in connection with the second step conversion of Westfield Mutual Holding Company. As part of the conversion, New Westfield Financial, Inc. succeeded Westfield Financial as the stock holding company of Westfield Bank, and Westfield Mutual Holding Company was dissolved. In the stock offering, a total of 18,400,000 shares representing Westfield Mutual Holding Company’s ownership interest in Westfield Financial were sold by New Westfield Financial in a subscription offering, community offering and syndicated offering. In addition, each outstanding share of Westfield Financial as of January 3, 2007 was exchanged for 3.28138 new shares of New Westfield Financial common stock. New Westfield Financial, Inc. changed its name to Westfield Financial, Inc. effective January 3, 2007. Proceeds, net of stock issuance costs, were approximately $171.7 million.


Westfield Financial has

We have adopted a growth-oriented strategy that has focused on increasedincreasing commercial lending.  Westfield Financial’sOur strategy also calls for increasing deposit relationships and broadening itsour product lines and services.  Westfield Financial believesWe believe that this business strategy is best for itsour long term success and viability, and complements itsour existing commitment to high quality customer service.  In connection with itsour overall growth strategy, Westfield Bank seekswe seek to:

grow our commercial and industrial and commercial real estate loan portfolio by targeting businesses in our primary market area and in northern Connecticut as a means to increase the yield on and diversify our loan portfolio and build transactional deposit account relationships;
focus on expanding our retail banking franchise and increase the number of households served within our market area; and

continue to grow its commercial and industrial and commercial real estate loan portfolio by targeting businesses in its primary market area and in northern Connecticut as a means to increase the yield on and diversify its loan portfolio and build transactional deposit account relationships;

to supplement the commercial focus, grow the residential loan portfolio to diversify risk and deepen customer relationships.  We will maintain our arrangement with a third-party mortgage company which assists in originating and servicing residential real estate loans.  By doing this, we reduce the overhead costs associated with these loans.

focus on expanding its retail banking franchise and increase the number of households served within its market area; and


depending on market conditions, refer substantially all of the fixed-rate residential real estate loans to a third party mortgage company which underwrites, originates and services these loans in order to diversify its loan portfolio, increase fee income and reduce interest rate risk.


You should read ourthe following financial results for the year ended December 31, 20082010 in the context of this strategy.




54




Net income was $6.7 million, or $0.23 per diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to $8.7 million, or $0.29 per diluted share for the same period in 2007. The results for the year ended December 31, 2008 showed increases in net interest income and a lower provision for income taxes; however this was offset by an increase in the provision for loan losses and noninterest expenses and a decrease in noninterest income.


Westfield Bank provided $3.5 million for loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to $400,000 for the same period in 2007. This was the result of an increase in nonperforming loans, an increase in commercial and industrial loans and commercial real estate loans, and an increase in charged-off loans. The allowance was $8.8 million, or 1.83% of total loans, at December 31, 2008 and $5.7 million, or 1.36% of total loans, at December 31, 2007.


Net interest income increased $1.6 million to $31.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to $30.2 million for the same period in 2007. The net interest margin, on a tax equivalent basis, was 3.23% for the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to 3.25% for the same period in 2007. The increase in net interest income was primarily due to increases in average earning assets of $56.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Also contributing to the increase in net interest income was a decrease in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. The cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased 48 basis points to 3.02% for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007.


The year ended December 31, 2008 also includes a net loss of $205,000 on the sale and write-down of securities. Westfield Financial recorded write-downs of $1.3 million on securities deemed to be other than temporary impaired. This was primarily due to write-downs of $961,000 on preferred stock issued by Freddie Mac. Freddie Mac was placed into conservatorship by the United States Treasury in September 2008. Westfield Financial’s book value remaining on preferred stock issued by Freddie Mac was $39,000 at December 31, 2008. The write-downs were partially offset by net gains of $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 on the sale of other investment securities.


Net loans increased by $57.2 million, to $472.1 million at December 31, 2008 from $414.9 million at December 31, 2007. The increase in net loans was primarily the result of an increase in commercial and industrial loans and commercial real estate loans. Commercial and industrial loans increased $37.3 million to $153.9 million at December 31, 2008 from $116.5 million at December 31, 2007. Commercial real estate loans increased $33.9 million to $223.9 million at December 31, 2008 from $190.0 million at December 31, 2007.


Nonperforming loans increased $7.6 million to $8.8 million at December 31, 2008 compared to $1.2 million at December 31, 2007. This represented 1.83% of total loans at December 31, 2008 and 0.29% of total loans at December 31, 2007. The increase was primarily the result of a manufacturing commercial loan relationship of $5.5 million and an agricultural commercial loan relationship of $1.7 million.



55




Net income was $3.0 million, or $0.11 per diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to $5.5 million, or $0.18 per diluted share for the same period in 2009.  The results for the year ended December 31, 2010 showed an increase in the provision for loan losses and a decrease in net interest income; however, this was offset by an increase in noninterest income and a decrease in noninterest expense and the provision for income taxes.
We provided $8.9 million for loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to $3.9 million for the same period in 2009.  This was the result of an increase in net loan charge-offs due to a $7.2 million charge-off on a single commercial real estate loan relationship.  The allowance was $6.9 million, or 1.36% of total loans at December 31, 2010 and $7.6 million, or 1.60% of total loans at December 31, 2009.  In 2010, total loans increased $32.5 million, with the increase primarily in residential real estate loans which contain less credit risk and market risk than both commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans.
Net interest and dividend income decreased $3.1 million to $29.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to $32.5 million for the same period in 2009.  The net interest margin, on a tax-equivalent basis, was 2.64% for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to 3.04% for the same period in 2009.  The margin decreased because the yield on interest-earning assets decreased more than the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. The decrease in interest rates during 2010 caused an increase in prepayments on loans and investments and the funds were reinvested in a lower rate environment, thus reducing yields.
Noninterest income increased $4.2 million to $7.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to $3.2 million for the same period in 2009.  The increase was primarily the result of an increase in net gains on the sale of securities of $4.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2010.
36

Nonperforming loans decreased $2.3 million to $3.2 million at December 31, 2010, compared to $5.5 million at December 31, 2009.  This represented 0.63% of total loans at December 31, 2010 and 1.15% of total loans at December 31, 2009.  At December 31, 2010, nonperforming loans were primarily made up of three commercial relationships totaling $2.4 million.
General. Westfield Financial’s  Our consolidated results of operations are comprised of earnings on investments and loans and the net income recorded by its principal operating subsidiary, Westfieldthe Bank.  Westfield Bank’sOur consolidated results of operations depend primarily on net interest and dividend income.  Net interest and dividend income is the difference between the interest income earned on interest-earning assets and the interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities.  Interest-earning assets consist primarily of securities, commercial real estate loans, commercial and industrial loans and residential real estate loans, consumer loans, mortgage-backed securities and investment securities.loans.  Interest-bearing liabilities consist primarily of certificates of deposit and money market account, NOW account and savings account deposits, and borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston.Boston and securities sold under repurchase agreements.  The consolidated results of operations als oalso depend on the provision for loan losses, noninterest income, and noninterest expense.  Noninterest expense includes salaries and employee benefits, occupancy expenses and other general and administrative expenses.  Noninterest income includes service fees and charges, income on bank-owned life insurance, and gains (losses) on securities.


Critical Accounting Policies.Westfield Financial’s Our accounting policies are disclosed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.  Given Westfield Financial’sour current business strategy and asset/liability structure, the more critical policies are accounting for nonperforming loans, the allowance for loan losses and provision for loan losses, the classification of securities as either held to maturity or available for sale, other than temporary impairment of securities, and the valuation of deferred taxes.  In addition to the informational disclosure in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Westfield Financial’sour policy on each of these accounting policies is described in detail in the applicable sections of“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”  Senior management has discussed the development and selection of these ac counting estimatesaccounting policies and the related disclosures with the Audit Committee of Westfield Financial’sour Board of Directors.


On a quarterly basis, Westfield Financial reviews investment securities with unrealized depreciation

Our general policy regarding recognition of interest on a judgmental basis to assess whether the decline in fair value is temporary or other than temporary. Declines in the fair value of held to maturity and available for sale securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses. In estimating other than temporary impairment losses, management considers (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of Westfield Financial to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.




56




Securities, including mortgage-backed securities, which management has the positive intent and ability to hold until maturity are classified as held to maturity and are carried at amortized cost. Securities, including mortgage-backed securities, that have been identified as assets for which there is not a positive intent to hold to maturity are classified as available for sale and are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, net of income taxes, reported as a separate component of equity. Accordingly, a misclassification would have a direct effect on stockholders’ equity. Sales or reclassification as available for sale (except for certain permitted reasons) of held to maturity securities may result in the reclassification of all such securities to available for sale. Westfield Financial has never sold held to maturity securities or reclassified such securities to available for sale other than in specifically permitt ed circumstances. Westfield Financial does not acquire securities or mortgage-backed securities for purposes of engaging in trading activities.


Westfield Financial’s general policyloans is to discontinue the accrual of interest when principal or interest payments are delinquent 90 days or more, or earlier if the loan is considered impaired. Any unpaid amounts previously accrued on these loans are reversed from income. Subsequent cash receipts are applied to the outstanding principal balance or to interest income if, in the judgment of management, collection of principal balance is not in question. Loans are returned to accrual status when they become current as to both principal and interest and when subsequent performance reduces the concern as to the collectability of principal and interest. Loan fees and certain direct loan origination costs are deferred, and the net fee or cost is recognized as an adjustment to interest income over the estimated average lives of the related loans.


The process of evaluating the loan portfolio, classifying loans and determining the allowance and provision is described in detail in Part I under “Business of Westfield Financial and WestfieldBank – Lending Activities - Allowance for Loan Losses.” Westfield Financial’s  Our methodology for assessing the allocation of the allowance consists of two key components, which are a specific allowance for identified problems or impaired loans and a formula allowance for the remainder of the portfolio.  Measurement of impairment can be based on present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant change.  The allocation of the allowance is also reviewed by mana gementmanagement based upon itsour evaluation of then-existing economic and business conditions affecting Westfield Financial’sour key lending areas and other conditions, such as new loan products, credit quality trends (including trends in nonperforming loans expected to result from existing conditions), collateral values, loan volumes and concentrations, specific industry conditions within portfolio segments that existed as of the balance sheet date and the impact that such conditions were believed tohaveto have had on the collectability of the loan portfolio.  Although management believes it has established and maintained the allowance for loan losses at adequate levels, if management’s assumptions and judgments prove to be incorrect due to continued deterioration in economic, real estate and other conditions, and the allowance for loan losses is not adequate to absorb inherent losses, the Company’sour earnings and capital could be significantly and adversely affected.
37

On a quarterly basis, we review securities with a decline in fair value below the amortized cost of the investment to determine whether the decline in fair value is temporary or other than temporary.  Declines in the fair value of marketable equity securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than temporary based on the severity and duration of the impairment are reflected in earnings as realized losses.  In estimating other than temporary impairment losses for securities, impairment is required to be recognized if (1) we intend to sell the security; (2) it is “more likely than not” that we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis; or (3) for debt securities, the present value of expected cash flows is not sufficient to recover the entire amortized cost basis.  For all impaired available for sale securities that we intend to sell, or more likely than not will be required to sell, the full amount of the other than temporary impairment is recognized through earnings.  For other impaired debt securities, credit-related other than temporary impairment is recognized through earnings, while non-credit related other than temporary impairment is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes.




57




Westfield FinancialWe must make certain estimates in determining income tax expense for financial statement purposes.  These estimates occur in the calculation of the deferred tax assets and liabilities, which arise from the temporary differences between the tax basis and financial statement basis of the Company’sour assets and liabilities.  The carrying value of our net deferred tax asset is based on the Company’sour historic taxable income for the two prior years as well as our belief that it is more likely than not that the Companywe will generate sufficient future taxable income to realize these deferred tax assets.  Judgments regarding future taxable income may change due to changes in market conditions, changes in tax laws or other factors which could result in a change in the assessment of the realization of the net deferred tax asset.


Average Balance Sheet and Analysis of Net Interest and Dividend Income


The following table sets forth information relating to Westfield Financial’sour condition and net interest and dividend income for the years ended December 31, 2008, 20072010, 2009 and 20062008 and reflect the average yield on assets and average cost of liabilities for the years indicated.  The yields and costs were derived by dividing income or expense by the average balance of interest-earning assets or interest-bearing liabilities, respectively, for the years shown.  Average balances were derived from actual daily balances over the years indicated.  Interest income includes fees earned from making changes in loan rates or terms, and fees earned when commercial real estate loans were prepaid or refinanced.


The interest earned on tax exempttax-exempt assets is adjusted to a tax equivalenttax-equivalent basis to recognize the income tax savings which facilitates comparison between taxable and tax exempttax-exempt assets.




58







 

For the Years Ended December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

Average
Balance

 

Interest

 

Average
Yield/Cost

 

Average
Balance

 

Interest

 

Average
Yield/Cost

 

Average
Balance

 

Interest

 

Average
Yield/Cost

 

(Dollars in thousands)

ASSETS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-earning assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term investments(1)

$       33,674

 

$       594 

 

 1.76

%

 

$       53,624

 

$    2,800 

 

 5.22

%

 

$    18,658

 

$       872 

 

 4.67

%

Securities(5)

 521,767

 

 26,752 

 

 5.13

 

 

 491,968

 

 24,332 

 

 4.95

 

 

 372,519

 

 16,764 

 

 4.50

 

Loans(2)(5)

 444,492

 

 27,280 

 

 6.14

 

 

 398,281

 

 26,993 

 

 6.78

 

 

 386,039

 

 25,586 

 

 6.63

 

        Total interest-earning assets

 999,933

 

 54,626 

 

 5.46

 

 

 943,873

 

 54,125 

 

 5.73

 

 

 777,216

 

 43,222 

 

 5.56

 

        Total noninterest-earning assets

 68,831

 

 

 

 

 

 

 65,194

 

 

 

 

 

 

 50,535

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

        Total assets

$  1,068,764

 

 

 

 

 

 

$  1,009,067

 

 

 

 

 

 

$  827,751

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-bearing liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOW accounts

$       85,558

 

 1,205 

 

 1.41

 

 

$       80,613

 

 1,340 

 

 1.66

 

 

 $ 73,256

 

 908 

 

 1.24

 

Savings accounts

 60,515

 

 748 

 

 1.24

 

 

 41,266

 

 329 

 

 0.08

 

 

 45,241

 

 226 

 

 0.50

 

Money market deposit accounts

 67,017

 

 763 

 

 1.14

 

 

 85,045

 

 1,301 

 

 1.53

 

 

 109,710

 

 1,684 

 

 1.53

 

Time certificates of deposit

 330,892

 

 12,417 

 

 3.75

 

 

 369,516

 

 16,574 

 

 4.49

 

 

 368,901

 

 14,450 

 

 3.92

 

        Total interest-bearing deposits

 543,982

 

 15,133 

 

 

 

 

 576,440

 

 19,544 

 

 

 

 

 597,108

 

 17,268 

 

 

 

Short-term borrowings and long-tern debt

 194,750

 

 7,171 

 

 3.68

 

 

 92,750

 

 3,864 

 

 4.17

 

 

 65,062

 

 2,283 

 

 3.51

 

Interest-bearing liabilities

 738,732

 

 22,304 

 

 3.02

 

 

 669,190

 

 23,408 

 

 3.50

 

 

 662,170

 

 19,551 

 

 2.95

 

Non-interest-bearing deposits

 45,009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 39,387

 

 

 

 

 

 

 41,134

 

 

 

 

 

Other noninterest-bearing liabilities

 9,828

 

 

 

 

 

 

 10,495

 

 

 

 

 

 

 7,927

 

 

 

 

 

        Total noninterest-bearing liabilities

 54,837

 

 

 

 

 

 

 49,882

 

 

 

 

 

 

 49,061

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

        Total liabilities

 793,569

 

 

 

 

 

 

 719,072

 

 

 

 

 

 

 711,231

 

 

 

 

 

        Total equity

 275,195

 

 

 

 

 

 

 289,995

 

 

 

 

 

 

 116,520

 

 

 

 

 

        Total liabilities and equity

$  1,068,764

 

 

 

 

 

 

$  1,009,067

 

 

 

 

 

 

$  827,751

 

 

 

 

 

Less: Tax-equivalent adjustment(5)

 

 

 (570)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 (541)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 (787)

 

 

 

Net interest and dividend income

 

 

$  31,752 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$  30,176 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$  22,884 

 

 

 

Net interest rate spread(3)

 

 

 

 

 2.44

 

 

 

 

 

 

 2.23

 

 

 

 

 

 

 2.61

 

Net interest margin(4)

 

 

 

 

 3.23

%

 

 

 

 

 

 3.25

%

 

 

 

 

 

 3.05

%

Ratio of average interest-earning
  assets to average interest-bearing liabilities

 

 

 

 

 135.4

x

 

 

 

 

 

 141.0

x

 

 

 

 

 

 117.4

x

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1) Short-term investments include federal funds sold.

(2) Loans, including non-accrual loans, are net of deferred loan origination costs, and unadvanced funds.

(3) Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.

(4) Net interest margin represents tax equivalent net interest and dividend income as a percentage of average interest earning assets.

(5) Investment securities, loan income and net interest income are presented on a tax equivalent basis using a tax rate of 34%. The tax equivalent adjustment is deducted from tax
equivalent net interest and dividend income to agree to the amount reported in the statements of income.



59




38

      For the Years Ended December 31,    
 2010  2009   2008 
                        
 
Average
Balance
 Interest 
Avg Yield/
 Cost
  Average
Balance
  Interest 
Avg Yield/
Cost
  
Average
Balance
  Interest  
Avg Yield/
 Cost
 
                        
ASSETS:                       
Interest-earning assets                       
Loans(1)(2)
$482,215 $24,887  5.16% $476,214  $25,834 5.42% $444,492  $27,280  6.14%
Securities(2)
 647,462  22,079  3.41   597,811   27,286 4.56   521,767   26,752  5.13 
Short-term investments(3)
 13,948  8  0.06   15,051   11 0.07   33,674   594  1.76 
Total interest-earning assets 1,143,625  46,974  4.11   1,089,076   53,131 4.88   999,933   54,626  5.46 
Total noninterest-earning assets 78,811         72,267         68,831        
                               
                               
Total assets$1,222,436        $1,161,343         $1,068,764         
                               
                               
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY:                              
Interest-bearing liabilities                              
NOW accounts$76,954  933  1.21  $68,967   1,238 1.80  $85,558   1,205  1.41 
Savings accounts 112,546  824  0.73   89,185   955 1.07   60,515   748  1.24 
Money market accounts 56,082  358  0.64   53,100   467 0.88   67,017   763  1.14 
Time certificates of deposit 347,590  7,735  2.23   337,692   10,034 2.97   330,892   12,417  3.75 
Total interest-bearing deposits 593,172  9,850      548,944   12,694     543,982   15,133    
Short-term borrowings and long-term debt 296,752  6,915  2.33   260,083   7,328 2.82   194,750   7,171  3.68 
Interest-bearing liabilities 889,924  16,765  1.88   809,027   20,022 2.47   738,732   22,304  3.02 
Noninterest-bearing deposits 83,077         80,186         45,009        
Other noninterest-bearing liabilities 9,513         14,789         9,828        
Total noninterest-bearing liabilities 92,590         94,975         54,837        
                               
                               
Total liabilities 982,514         904,002         793,569        
Total equity 239,922         257,341         275,195        
Total liabilities and equity$1,222,436        $1,161,343 $        $1,068,764        
Less: Tax-equivalent adjustment(2)
    (827)         (601)        (570)   
Net interest and dividend income   $29,382         $32,508        $31,752    
Net interest rate spread(4)
       2.22%        2.41%         2.44%
Net interest margin(5)
       2.64%        3.04%         3.23%
Ratio of average interest-earning
assets to average interest-bearing liabilities
       128.5         134.6          135.4 
                               
____________________________________________
(1)Loans, including non-accrual loans, are net of deferred loan origination costs, and unadvanced funds.
(2)Securities income, loan income and net interest income are presented on a tax-equivalent basis using a tax rate of 34%.  The tax-equivalent adjustment is deducted from tax-equivalent net interest and dividend income to agree to the amount reported in the statements of income.
(3)Short-term investments include federal funds sold.
(4)Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
(5)Net interest margin represents tax-equivalent net interest and dividend income as a percentage of average interest-earning-assets.
39

Rate/Volume Analysis.  The following table shows how changes in interest rates and changes in the volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities have affected Westfield Financial’sour interest and dividend income and interest expense during the periods indicated.  Information is provided in each category with respect to:  (1) interest income changes attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate); (2) interest income changes attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume); and (3) the net change.


The changes attributable to the combined impact of volume and rate have been allocated proportionately to the changes due to volume and the changes due to rate.


 

Year Ended December 31, 2008
Compared to Year Ended December 31,
2007

 

Year Ended December 31, 2007
Compared to Year Ended December 31,
2006

 

Increase/(Decrease) Due to

 

 

 

Increase/(Decrease) Due to

 

 

 

Volume

 

Rate

 

Net

 

Volume

 

Rate

 

Net

 

(In thousands)

Interest-Earning Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term investments

$  (1,042)

 

$  (1,164)

 

$  (2,206)

 

$  1,634 

 

$     294 

 

$  1,928 

Investment securities(1)

 1,474 

 

 946 

 

 2,420 

 

 5,375 

 

 2,193 

 

 7,568 

Loans(1)

 3,132 

 

 (2,845)

 

 287 

 

 811 

 

 596 

 

 1,407 

Total interest-earning assets

 3,564 

 

 (3,063)

 

 501 

 

 7,820 

 

 3,083 

 

 10,903 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-bearing liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOW accounts

 82 

 

 (217)

 

 (135)

 

 91 

 

 341 

 

 432 

Savings accounts

 153 

 

 266 

 

 419 

 

 (20)

 

 123 

 

 103 

Money market deposit accounts

 (276)

 

 (262)

 

 (538)

 

 (379)

 

 (4)

 

 (383)

Time certificates of deposit

 (1,732)

 

 (2,425)

 

 (4,157)

 

 24 

 

 2,100 

 

 2,124 

Short-term borrowings and long-
    term debt

 4,249 

 

 (942)

 

 3,307 

 

 972 

 

 609 

 

 1,581 

Total interest-bearing
    liabilities

 2,476 

 

 (3,580)

 

 (1,104)

 

 688 

 

 3,169 

 

 3,857 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in net interest and
    dividend income

$   1,088 

 

$      517 

 

$   1,605 

 

$  7,132 

 

$      (86)

 

$  7,046 


_________________

(1) Securities and loan income and net interest income are presented on a tax equivalent basis using a tax rate of 34%. The tax equivalent adjustment is deducted from tax equivalent net interest income to agree to the amount reported in the statements of income.




60




  
Year Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to Year
Ended December 31, 2009
  
Year Ended December 31, 2009 Compared to Year
Ended December 31, 2008
 
       
  Increase (Decrease) Due to  Increase (Decrease) Due to 
  Volume  Rate  Net  Volume  Rate  Net 
Interest-earning assets (In thousands) 
Loans (1)
 $326  $(1,273) $(947) $1,947  $(3,393) $(1,446)
Securities (1)
  2,266   (7,473)  (5,207)  3,899   (3,365)  534 
Short-term investments  (1)  (2)  (3)  (329)  (254)  (583)
Total interest-earning assets  2,591   (8,748)  (6,157)  5,517   (7,012)  (1,495)
                         
Interest-bearing liabilities                        
NOW accounts  143   (448)  (305)  (234)  267   33 
Savings accounts  250   (381)  (131)  354   (147)  207 
Money market accounts  26   (135)  (109)  (158)  (138)  (296)
Time deposits  294   (2,593)  (2,299)  255   (2,638)  (2,383)
Short-term borrowing and long-time debt  1,033   (1,446)  (413)  2,406   (2,249)  157 
Total interest-bearing liabilities  1,746   (5,003)  (3,257)  2,623   (4,905)  (2,282)
Change in net interest and dividend income $845  $(3,745) $(2,900) $2,894  $(2,107) $787 
(1)Securities and loan income and net interest income are presented on a tax-equivalent basis using a tax rate of 34%.   The tax-equivalent adjustment is deducted from tax-equivalent net interest income to agree to the amount reported in the statements of income. 
40

Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 20082010 and December 31, 2007

2009


Total assets increased $69.3$48.1 million to $1.1$1.2 billion at December 31, 2008 from $1.0 billion at December 31, 2007. Securities and mortgage-backed securities decreased $17.02010.  Net loans increased by $33.2 million to $505.8$502.3 million at December 31, 20082010 from $522.8$469.1 million at December 31, 2007. Investment securities2009.  Securities increased $31.9 million to $656.4 million at December 31, 2010 from $624.5 million at December 31, 2009.  Cash and cash equivalents decreased $17.1 million to $11.6 million at December 31, 2010 from $28.7 million at December 31, 2009, as funds receivedwere reinvested into securities and loans.

Securities increased $31.9 million to $656.4 million at December 31, 2010 from securities that matured, sold, or paid down$624.5 million at December 31, 2009.  Securities increased as funds from deposits and long-term debt were used to originate loans.reinvested in securities.  The securities portfolio is primarily comprised of mortgage-backed securities, which totaled $402.1$576.2 million at December 31, 2008,2010, the majority of which were issued by government-sponsored enterprises such as Fannie Mae.the Federal National Mortgage Association.  Privately issued mortgage-backed securities comprised 9.3%$7.6 million, or 1.32%, of the mortgage-backed securities portfolio at December 31, 2008 and are rated investment grade by Standard & Poors.

2010.


Debt securities issued by government-sponsored enterprises decreased $41.0$27.7 million to $61.2$17.9 million at December 31, 20082010 from $102.2$45.6 million at December 31, 2007.2009.  Securities issued by government-sponsored enterprises consist entirely of bonds issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and the Federal Home Loan Bank. Westfield FinancialCorporation.  We also investsinvest in municipal bonds issued by cities and towns in Massachusetts andthat are rated as investment grade by Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s or Fitch, and the majority of which are also independently insured.  Municipal bonds were $36.4$43.1 million at December 31, 20082010 and $33.0$36.4 million at December 31, 2007.2009.  In addition, Westfield Financial haswe have investments in Federal Home Loan BankFHLB stock and mutual funds that invest only in securities allowed by the OfficeOTS.

In August 2010, we transferred all of Thrift Supervision.

our held-to-maturity securities to the available-for-sale category.  We determined that we no longer had the positive intent to hold our securities classified as held-to-maturity for an indefinite period of time because of our desire to have more flexibility in managing the investment portfolio.  The securities transferred had a total amortized cost of $287.1 million, fair value of $299.7 million and a net unrealized gain of $12.6 million which was recorded as other comprehensive income at the time of transfer.


Net loans increased by $57.2$33.2 million to $472.1$502.3 million at December 31, 20082010 from $414.9$469.1 million at December 31, 2007. This2009.  The increase in net loans was primarily the result of an increase in residential real estate loans, partially offset by decreases in commercial real estate loans and commercial and industrial loans and commercialloans.  Residential real estate loans. Commercial and industrial loans increased $37.4$49.7 million to $153.9$148.8 million at December 31, 20082010 from $116.5$99.1 million at December 31, 2007. Commercial real estate2009.  We have begun to purchase more residential loans increased $33.9 million to $223.9 million at December 31, 2008 from $190.0 million at December 31, 2007. The increases in commercialas a means of diversifying our loan portfolio.

Commercial and industrial and commercial real estate loans were due to increased loan originations in the Bank’s market area.


Residential real estate loans decreased $9.7 million to $98.4$135.3 million at December 31, 20082010 from $108.1$145.0 million at December 31, 2007. Since September 2001, Westfield Bank has referred substantially all2009.  While we continue to originate commercial and industrial loans, new originations were offset by customers decreasing their balances on lines of the originations of its residentialcredit and normal loan payments and payoffs.


Commercial real estate loans decreased $7.5 million to $221.6 million at December 31, 2010 from $229.1 million at December 31, 2009.  In addition to normal loan payments and payoffs, the decrease in commercial real estate loans from December 31, 2009 included the full charge-off of $7.2 million related to one commercial real estate loan.  During the second quarter of 2010, the initial $3.6 million of the loan was charged-off and the final $3.6 million was charged-off in the third quarter of 2010.  The loan, a leasehold mortgage, was related to a third party mortgage company. Residentialretail building which lost its tenant, a national chain store, due to bankruptcy.  We have minimal exposure to commercial real estate borrowers submit applications to Westfield Bank, but the loan is approved byloans which involve similar leasehold mortgages.  Owner occupied commercial real estate loans totaled $107.0 million at December 31, 2010 and closed on the books of the mortgage company. The third party mortgage company owns the servicing rights$99.3 million at December 31, 2009, while non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans totaled $114.6 million at December 31, 2010 and services the loans. Westfield Bank retains no residual ownership interest in these loans.

$129.7 million at December 31, 2009. 




61




Asset growth was funded primarily through a $68.3$52.3 million increase in long-term debt,deposits, which totaled $173.3$700.3 million at December 31, 2008.2010, compared to $648.0 million at December 31, 2009.  Regular savings accounts and money market accounts increased $22.7 million to $177.5 million at December 31, 2010.  NOW and checking accounts increased $18.3 million to $168.8 million at December 31, 2010.  In addition, time deposits increased $11.3 million to $354.0 million.  Sales emphasis was placed on relationship-based products, which resulted in increases in all deposit product categories.
41


  Long-term debt consists of FHLB advances, and securities sold under repurchase agreements and customer repurchase agreements with an original maturity of one year or more.  At December 31, 2008, Westfield Bank2010, we had $115.0$151.6    million in long-term debt with the FHLB, and $58.3$81.3 million in securities sold under repurchase agreements with a broker-dealer approved by the Company’s management and Board of Directors.$5.2    million in customer repurchase agreements.  This compares to $105.0$127.5 million in FHLB advances, and no$81.3 million in securities sold under repurchase agreements at December 31, 2007. Securities sold under repurchase agreements were executed with a weighted average interest rate of 2.62%2009 and final maturities of $9.8$5.0 million in the year 2013 and $48.5 million in the year 2018. The securities sold undercustomer repurchase agreements are callable at the issuer’s option beginning in the years 2009 to 2012.agreements.  Current interest rates permit Westfield Bankus to earn a more advantageous spread by borrowing funds and reinvesting in loans and securities.


Short-term borrowings increased $14.6decreased $11.6 million to $49.8$62.9 million at December 31, 20082010 from $35.2$74.5 million at December 31, 2007.2009.  Short-term borrowings are made up of FHLB advances with an original maturity of less than one year as well as customer repurchase agreements, which have an original maturity of one day.  Short-term borrowings issued by the FHLB were $28.5$50.6 million and $18.4$58.0 million at December 31, 20082010 and 2007,2009, respectively.  Customer repurchase agreements increased $4.5decreased $4.2 million to $21.3$12.3 million at December 31, 20082010 from $16.8$16.5 million at December 31, 2007.2009.  A customer repurchase agreement is an agreement by Westfield Bankus to sell to and repurchase from the customer an interest in specific securities issued by or guaranteed by the United States government.government or government-sponsored enterprises.  This transaction settles immediately on a same day basis in immediately available funds.  Interest paid is commensurate with other products of equal interest and credit risk.  At Dec emberDecember 31, 2008,2010, all of Westfield Bank’sour customer repurchase agreements were held by commercial customers.


Total deposits

Shareholders’ equity decreased $14.7$26.1 million to $588.0$221.2 million at December 31, 20082010 from $602.7$247.3 million at December 31, 2007. The decrease in deposits was due to a decrease in time deposit and money market accounts, partially offset by an increase in regular savings and checking accounts. Time deposits decreased $25.6 million to $327.6 million at December 31, 2008. Management placed less emphasis on gathering time deposits in favor of using other types of funding, such as securities sold under repurchase agreements. Management believes that doing so helped control funding costs.


Money market accounts decreased $16.9 million to $57.7 million at December 31, 2008. These decreases were partially offset by increases of $21.0 million in regular savings and $6.9 million in checking accounts. The increases in both regular savings and checking accounts were fueled by new products with higher interest rates than the Bank’s other comparable products.




62




Stockholders’ equity decreased $26.6 million to $259.9 million at December 31, 2008 from $286.5 million at December 31, 2007.2009.  This represented 23.4%17.8% of total assets as of December 31, 20082010 and 27.6%20.8% of total assets as of December 31, 2007.2009.  The decrease in stockholders’shareholders’ equity is the result ofreflects the repurchase of 1,058,7781,988,634 shares of our common stock at a cost of $10.5$16.1 million, pursuant to Westfield Financial’sour current stock repurchaserepurchases plan, paying outthe payment of regular and special dividends amounting to $17.9$14.3 million, or $0.60$0.52 per share, and a decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income of $10.0$3.2 million.  This was partially offset by an increase of $4.6 million related to the recognition of share-based compensation and the exercise of stock options and net income of $6.7$3.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the issuance of 433,110 shares of common stock amounting to $1.9 million in connection with stock option exercises. All of the stock options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2008 were granted in 2002.

2010.


Comparison of Operating Results for Years Ended December 31, 20082010 and 2007

2009


General.Net income for the year ended December 31, 20082010 was $6.7$3.0 million, or $0.23$0.11 per diluted share, compared to $8.7$5.5 million, or $0.29$0.18 per diluted share for the same period in 2007.

2009.


Interest and Dividend Income.Total interest and dividend income increased $473,000decreased $6.4 million to $54.1$46.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008,2010, compared to $53.6$52.5 million for the same period in 2007.

2009.


The increasedecrease in interest income was primarily the result of a $56.1 million increasedecrease in the average interest-earningsyield on interest-earning assets for the twelve monthsyear ended December 31, 2008. Average2010, which was partially offset by an increase in the average balance of interest-earning assets were $1.0 billion for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008 compared to $943.9 million for the same period in 2007.period.  The average yield on interest-earning assets, on a tax-equivalent basis, decreased 2777 basis points to 5.46%4.11% for the twelve monthsyear ended December 31, 20082010 from 5.73%4.88% for the same period in 2007.

2009.  The cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased 59 basis points to 1.88% for the year ended December 31, 2010 from 2.47% for the same period in 2009.


Interest and dividendsincome on securities increased $2.4decreased $5.4 million to $26.3$21.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to $23.9 million for the same period in 2007. The average balance on securities increased $29.8 million to $521.8 million at December 31, 20082010 from $492.0 million at December 31, 2007. In addition, the tax-equivalent yield on securities increased from 4.95% for the year 2007 to 5.13% for the same period in 2008. The increase in interest and dividend income on securities was partially offset by a decrease in the tax-equivalent yield on and average balance of short-term investments. The tax-equivalent yield on short-term investments decreased 346 basis points to 1.76% for the year ended December 31, 2008 from 5.22% for the same period in 2007 due to the falling interest rate environment. In addition, the average balance of short-term investments decreased $20.0 million from $53.6 million for the year ended December 3 1, 2007 to $33.6$26.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.


Interest income2009.  The tax-equivalent yield on securities decreased 115 basis points from loans increased $287,0004.56% for the year 2009 to $27.33.41% for the same period in 2010 due to the enduring low interest rate environment.  The decrease in interest rates during 2010 caused an increase in prepayments on investments and the funds were reinvested in a lower rate environment, thus reducing yields.  This was partially offset by a $49.7 million increase in the average balance of securities from $597.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 from $27.02009 to $647.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. The average balance of2010.


Interest income on loans increased $46.2 milliondecreased $993,000 to $444.5$24.7 million for the year ended December 31, 20082010 from $398.3$25.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2007




63




2009.  The tax-equivalent yield on loans decreased 26 basis points from 5.42% for the year 2009 to 5.16% for the same period in 2010 due to the enduring low interest rate environment.  The decrease in interest rates during 2010 caused an increase in interest income resulting fromprepayments on loans and the volume of average loan balances of $3.1 millionfunds were reinvested in a lower rate environment, thus reducing yields.  This was partially offset by a decrease$6.0 million increase in the yield onaverage balance of loans of $2.8from $476.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The falling interest rate environment in 2008 caused a decrease in the average yield on loans of 64 basis points2009 to 6.14%$482.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 from 6.78% for the comparable 2007 period.

2010.

42


Interest Expense.Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 20082010 decreased $1.1$3.3 million to $22.3$16.7 million from the comparable 20072009 period.  This was attributable to a decrease in the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities of 4859 basis points to 3.02%1.88% for the year ended December 31, 20082010 from 3.50%2.47% for the same period in 2007. In addition, the average balance of total interest-bearing liabilities increased $69.5 million to $738.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 from $669.2 million for the same period in 2007.2009.  The decrease in the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities was primarily due to the falling interest rate environment. Additionally, management placed less emphasisa decrease in rates on gathering time deposits, in order to take advantage of other sources of lower-cost funding, such as long-term debtrepurchase agreements and short-term borrowings, to control funding costs.

borrowings.


Net Interest and Dividend Income.Net interest and dividend income increased $1.6decreased $3.1 million to $31.8$29.4 million for the year ended December 31, 20082010 as compared to $30.2$32.5 million for same period in 2007.2009.  The net interest margin, on a tax-equivalent basis, was 3.23%2.64% and 3.25%3.04% for the years ended December 31, 20082010 and 2007,2009, respectively.  The change in net interest and dividend income for the year ended December 31, 20082010 was primarily the result of a decrease in interest expense of $1.1 million from the comparable 2007 period resulting from a decrease inyield on interest-earning assets decreasing more than the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities, partially offset by an increase in interest and dividend income of $473,000 resulting from an increase in the average balance of interest-earning assets of $56.1 million for the year ending December 31, 2008.

liabilities.


Provision for Loan Losses.The provision for loan losses is reviewed by management based upon itsour evaluation of then-existing economic and business conditions affecting theour key lending areas of Westfield Financial and other conditions, such as new loan products, credit quality trends (including trends in nonperforming loans expected to result from existing conditions), collateral values, loan volumes and concentrations, specific industry conditions within portfolio segments that existed as of the balance sheet date and the impact that such conditions were believed to have had on the collectability of the loan portfolio.


The amount that Westfield Bankwe provided for the provision for loan losses during the year ended December 31, 20082010 was based upon the changes that occurred in the loan portfolio during that same period as well as the continued weakening of the local and national economy.  The changes in the loan portfolio, described in detail below, include an increase in net loan charge-offs, partially offset by decreases in commercial and industrial loans and commercial real estate loans an increase in impaired loans and nonperforming loans, and an increase in net charged-offresidential real estate loans.  After evaluating these factors, Westfield Bankwe provided $3.5$8.9 million for loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2008,2010, compared to $400,000$3.9 million for the same period in 2007.2009.  The allowance was $8.8$6.9 million at December 31, 20082010 and $5.7$7.6 million at December 31, 2007.2009.  The allowance for loan losses was 1.83%1.36% of total loans at December 31, 20082010 and 1.36%1.60% at December 31, 2007.

2009.


For the year ended December 31, 2010, we recorded net charge-offs of $9.6 million compared to net charge-offs of $5.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009.  The 2010 period was comprised of charge-offs of $9.7 million partially offset by recoveries of $83,000.  For the year ended December 31, 2010, charge-offs were primarily made up of a $7.2 million charge-off on a single commercial real estate loan relationship.  The loan, a leasehold mortgage, was related to a retail building which lost its tenant, a national chain store, due to bankruptcy.  We have minimal exposure to commercial real estate loans which involve similar leasehold mortgages.  We are currently in the process of initiating a recovery action against the borrower.

The 2009 period was comprised of charge-offs of $5.1 million partially offset by recoveries of $48,000.  Charge-offs for the 2009 period were primarily due to three unrelated commercial loan relationships which resulted in charge offs totaling $4.7 million.

64




Nonperforming loans decreased $2.3 million to $3.2 million at December 31, 2010 from $5.5 million at December 31, 2009.  This represented 0.63% of total loans at December 31, 2010 and 1.15% of total loans at December 31, 2009.  At December 31, 2008,2010, nonperforming loans were primarily made up of three commercial and industrialrelationships totaling $2.4 million.

At December 31, 2010, residential real estate loans increased $37.4$49.7 million to $153.9$148.8 million compared toat December 31, 2007. Westfield Bank considers2010.  We consider these types of loans to contain moreless credit risk and market risk than both commercial real estate loans and conventional residential real estate mortgages.commercial and industrial loans.  Commercial real estate loans increased by $33.9decreased $7.5 million to $223.9$221.6 million at December 31, 2008.


For the year ended2010.  Commercial and industrial loans decreased $9.7 million to $135.3 million compared to December 31, 2008, Westfield Bank recorded net charge-offs of $383,000 compared to net charge-offs of $111,000 for the year ended December 31, 2007. The 2008 period was comprised of charge-offs of $449,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008, partially offset by recoveries of $66,000 for the same period. The 2007 period was comprised of charge-offs of $317,000 for the year ended December 31, 2007, partially offset by recoveries of $206,000 for the same period.


Nonperforming loans increased $7.6 million to $8.8 million at December 31, 2008 from $1.2 million at December 31, 2007. This represented 1.83% of total loans at December 31, 2008 and 0.29% of total loans at December 31, 2007. The increase was primarily the result of a manufacturing commercial loan relationship of $5.5 million and an agricultural commercial loan relationship of $1.7 million.


The manufacturing commercial loan relationship is secured by real estate and other business assets. Additionally, all debt is cross-collateralized, defaulted, and guaranteed with the exception of the SBA guaranteed notes. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, a valuation allowance of $2.1 million was allocated on the relationship of $5.5 million based on the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral.


The agricultural commercial loan relationship is primarily secured by real estate. Management does not anticipate incurring significant losses on this relationship. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, a valuation allowance of $138,000 was allocated on the loan relationship of $1.7 million based on the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral.


Nonperforming residential real estate loans increased $149,000 to $1.1 million at December 31, 2008 from $995,000 at December 31, 2007. The majority of nonperforming residential real estate loans are collateralized by first liens.


Impaired loans increased $5.4 million to $5.6 million at December 31, 2008 primarily as a result of the two commercial loan relationships consisting of an agricultural commercial loan relationship of $1.7 million and a manufacturing commercial loan relationship of $5.5 million, as discussed above. The manufacturing commercial loan relationship is secured by real estate and other business assets. Additionally, all debt is cross-collateralized, defaulted, and guaranteed with the exception of the SBA guaranteed notes. Management estimates a $1.9 million loss on this relationship. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, a valuation allowance of $138,000 was allocated on the loan relationship of $1.7 million and a valuation allowance of $1.9 million was allocated on the loan relationship of $5.5 million based on the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral.



65




2009.

43

Although management believes it has established and maintained the allowance for loan losses at adequateappropriate levels, future adjustments may be necessary if economic, real estate and other conditions differ substantially from the current operating environment.


Noninterest Income.Noninterest income decreased $1.1increased $4.2 million to $3.5$7.4 million for the year ended December 31, 20082010 compared to $4.6$3.2 million for the same period in 2007. The 2007 results include a pre-tax gain of $546,0002009.

Net gains on the salesales of a piece of vacant land in Feeding Hills, Massachusetts. The results for the 2007 year also include a pre-tax gain of $315,000 resulting from the curtailment of a defined benefit plan, specifically pertaining to providing a life insurance benefit to employees who retire from Westfield Bank.

The year ended December 31, 2008 included a net loss of $205,000 on the sale and write-down of securities. Westfield Financial recorded write-downs of $1.3 million on securities deemed to be other than temporarily impaired. This was primarily due to write-downs on preferred stock issued by Freddie Mac of $961,000. Freddie Mac was placed into conservatorship by the United States Treasury in September 2008. Westfield Financial’s book value remaining on preferred stock issued by Freddie Mac was $39,000 at December 31, 2008. The write-downs were partially offset by net gains of $1.1$4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 20082010, compared to a net loss of $383,000 for the same period in 2009.  The increase in net gains on the salesales of other investment securities. securities for the year ended 2010 is primarily the result of management wanting to take advantage of unrealized gains within the portfolio as well as wanting to restructure the securities portfolio.  


For the year ended December 31, 2007, Westfield Financial reported net gains2010, income from service charges and fees decreased $676,000 to $1.9 million, compared to $2.6 million for the comparable 2009 period. This decrease was the result of $41,000decreases in income from the third-party mortgage program and fees collected on sales of securities.

overdraft or insufficient customer accounts.  Income from bank-owned life insurance increased $98,000the third-party mortgage program decreased $485,000 to $1.4 million$87,000 for the year ended December 31, 20082010, compared to the same period in 2007. This was primarily the result of a $2.8 million increase$572,000 in the average balancecomparable 2009 period.  We have begun to buy back more residential loans from a third-party mortgage company as a means of bank-owneddiversifying our loan portfolio.  As a result, we forgo receiving referral fee income on these loans but instead earn interest income for the life insuranceof the loans.  In addition, net checking account processing fee income decreased $198,000 to $961,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010, primarily due to a decrease in 2008 compared to 2007.

overdraft fee income.


Noninterest Expense.Noninterest expense for the twelve monthsyear ended December 31, 20082010 was $23.3$24.8 million compared to $21.8$25.0 million for the same period in 2007.2009.  This increasedecrease was primarily due to an increasea decrease of $921,000$383,000 in salariesFDIC insurance expense to $751,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to $1.1 million during the same period in 2009.  The decrease was due to a special assessment of $453,000 for the 2009 period.  Salaries and benefits decreased $306,000 to $14.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Expenses2010, primarily the result of a $317,000 decrease in costs related to share-based compensation increased $702,000stock-based compensation.  This was partially offset by a $327,000             increase in expenses associated with other real estate owned (“OREO”).  OREO expenses were related to write-downs and maintenance of foreclosed properties.

Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes decreased $1.2 million to $34,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008 as a result of new grants of restricted stock2010, compared to $1.3 million for the comparable 2009 period.  The effective tax rate was 1.1% for the year ended December 31, 2010 and stock options awarded18.8% for the same period in 2009.  The decrease in the third quartertax provision and effective tax rate in the 2010 period is due primarily to lower pre-tax income while maintaining the same level of 2007. In addition, expenses relatedtax-advantaged income such as BOLI and tax-exempt municipal obligations.
44

Comparison of Operating Results for Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008

General.  Net income for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $5.5 million, or $0.18 per diluted share, compared to employee health insurance increased $150,000 due$6.7 million, or $0.22 per diluted share for the same period in 2008.

Interest and Dividend Income. Total interest and dividend income decreased $1.6 million to normal increases in this area.

Data processing expense increased $270,000 to $1.7$52.5 million for the year ended December 31, 20082009, compared to $1.4$54.1 million for the same period in 2007. This2008.


The decrease in interest income was primarily the result of new software licensing agreements and new technology relateda decrease in the average yield on interest-earning assets for the year ended December 31, 2009, which was partially offset by an increase in the average balance of interest-earning assets for the same period.  The average yield on interest-earning assets, on a tax-equivalent basis, decreased 58 basis points to branch deposit imaging.

Professional services expense4.88% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 from 5.46% for the same period in 2008.  While the decrease in the average yield on the balance of interest-earning assets, on a tax-equivalent basis, decreased interest income by $7.0 million, the average balance of interest-earning assets increased $225,000$89.1 million, resulting in a partial offset of $5.5 million to $1.6the decrease in interest income for the year ended December 31, 2009.


Interest income on loans decreased $1.4 million to $25.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to $1.4 million for the same period in 2007. This was primarily the result of expenses related to fees paid to consultants for work performed reviewing internal Bank procedures in order to improve efficiencies.

Income Taxes.The provision for income taxes decreased $2.0 million to $1.82009 from $27.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.  The tax-equivalent yield on loans decreased 72 basis points from 6.14% for the year 2008 to 5.42% for the same period in 2009 due to the falling interest rate environment.  The decrease in interest income resulting from the decrease in the provision for income taxaverage yield on loans was primarily due to lower income before taxes. The effective tax rate was 21.2%partially offset by a $31.7 million increase in the average balance of loans from $444.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 and 30.5% for the same period in 2007.



66




Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006


Total assets increased $43.0 million to $1.0 billion at December 31, 2007 from $996.8 million at December 31, 2006. Cash and cash equivalents decreased $116.9 million, to $37.6 million at December 31, 2007 from $154.5 million at December 31, 2006. The decrease in cash and cash equivalents was the result of management investing the proceeds of Westfield Financial’s second step stock offering, which was completed on January 3, 2007, in investment securities and loans.


Securities and mortgage-backed securities increased $113.8 million to $522.8 million at December 31, 2007 from $409.0 million at December 31, 2006. Investment securities increased as management invested the proceeds of Westfield Financial’s second step stock offering, which was completed on January 3, 2007. The securities portfolio is primarily comprised of mortgage-backed securities, which totaled $380.8 million at December 31, 2007, the majority of which were issued by government-sponsored enterprises such as Fannie Mae. Privately issued mortgage-backed securities comprised 11.9% of the mortgage-backed securities portfolio at December 31, 2007, are rated AAA by Standard & Poors, and contain no sub-prime collateral.


Debt securities issued by government-sponsored enterprises increased by $20.4 million to $102.2 million at December 31, 2007 from $81.8 million at December 31, 2006. Securities issued by government-sponsored enterprises consist entirely of bonds issued by the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston. Westfield Financial also invests in municipal bonds issued by cities and towns in Massachusetts and are AAA rated by Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s, or Fitch, and the majority of which are also independently insured. Municipal bonds were $33.0 million at December 31, 2007 and $30.2 million at December 31, 2006. In addition, Westfield Financial has investments in Federal Home Loan Bank stock and mutual funds that invest only in securities allowed by the Office of Thrift Supervision.


Net loans increased by $29.7 million to $414.9 million at December 31, 2007 from $385.2 million at December 31, 2006. This was primarily the result of an increase in commercial and industrial loans and commercial real estate loans. Commercial and industrial loans increased $16.3 million to $116.5 million at December 31, 2007 from $100.2 million at December 31, 2006. Commercial real estate loans increased $15.4 million to $189.9 million at December 31, 2007 from $174.5 million at December 31, 2006. The increase in commercial and industrial loans and commercial real estate loans were due to increased loan originations.


Residential real estate loans decreased $1.4 million to $108.1 million at December 31, 2007 from $109.5 million at December 31, 2006. Since September 2001, Westfield Bank has referred substantially all of the originations of its residential real estate loans to a third party mortgage company. Residential real estate borrowers submit applications to Westfield Bank, but the loan is approved by and closed on the books of the mortgage company. The third party mortgage company owns the servicing rights and services the loans. Westfield Bank retains no residual ownership interest in these loans.




67




Asset growth was funded primarily through a $68.4 million increase in Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings and debt, which totaled $123.4 million at December 31, 2007. Customer repurchase agreements decreased $1.1 million to $16.8 million at December 31, 2007 from $17.9 million at December 31, 2006. A customer repurchase agreement is an agreement by Westfield Bank to sell to and repurchase from the customer an interest in specific securities issued by or guaranteed by the United States Government. This transaction settles immediately on a same day basis in immediately available funds. Interest paid is commensurate with other products of equal interest and credit risk. At December 31, 2007, all of Westfield Bank’s customer repurchase agreements were held by commercial customers.

Total deposits decreased $24.8 million to $602.7 million at December 31, 2007 from $627.5 million at December 31, 2006. The decrease in deposits was due to a decrease in time deposit and money market accounts, partially offset by an increase in regular savings and checking accounts. Time deposits decreased $20.7 million to $353.3 million at December 31, 2007. Management placed less emphasis on gathering time deposits in favor of using other types of funding, such as borrowings and debt.

Money market accounts decreased $19.8 million to $74.6 million at December 31, 2007. These decreases were partially offset by increases of $11.0 million in regular savings and $4.9 million in checking accounts. The increases in both regular savings and checking accounts were fueled by new products with higher interest rates than Westfield Bank’s other comparable products.

Stockholders’ equity decreased $2.9 million to $286.5 million at December 31, 2007 from $289.4 million at December 31, 2006. This represented 27.6% of total assets as of December 31, 2007 and 29.0% of total assets as of December 31, 2006. The change is primarily comprised of paying out regular and special dividends amounting to $0.40 per share in 2007 for a total of $12.1 million, partially offset by net income of $8.7$476.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Comparison2009.


The tax-equivalent yield on and average balance of Operating Results for Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006

General.Net incomeshort-term investments decreased for the year ended December 31, 2007 was $8.7 million, or $0.29 per diluted share, compared2009.  The tax-equivalent yield on short-term investments decreased 169 basis points to $4.7 million, or $0.15 per diluted share0.07% for the year ended December 31, 2009 from 1.76% for the same period in 2006. The increase in earnings was primarily2008 due to the resultenduring low interest rate environment.  In addition, the average balance of increase in net interest income, partially offset by increased noninterest expenses.

Interest and Dividend Income.Total interest and dividend income increased $11.2short-term investments decreased $18.6 million or 26.3%, to $53.6from $33.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, compared2008 to $42.4 million for the same period in 2006.

The increase in interest income was primarily the result of a $166.7 million increase in average earnings assets as a result of funds raised in Westfield Financial’s second step stock offering, which was completed on January 3, 2007. Average earning assets were $943.9$15.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared2009.  Management actively reinvested available funds during the year into securities and loans in order to $777.2 million for the same period in 2006. The averageearn a more favorable yield on earning assets, on a tax equivalent basis, increased 17 basis points to 5.73% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 from 5.56% for the same periodour interest-earning assets.


These decreases were partially offset by an increase in 2006.



68





Interestinterest and dividends on securities was $23.9of $500,000 to $26.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 and $16.12009 compared to $26.3 million for the same period in 2006. The average balance on securities increased $119.5 million to $492.0 million at December 31, 2007 from $372.5 million at December 31, 2006. In addition, the tax equivalent yield on securities increased to 4.95% for the year 2007 from 4.50% for the year 2006.2008.  The increase in interest and dividend income on securities was primarilydue to an increase in the result ofaverage balance on securities, which increased $76.0 million to $597.8 million at December 31, 2009 from $521.8 million at December 31, 2008.  The increase was partially offset by a decrease in the reinvestment of the proceeds of Westfield Financial’s second step stock offering,tax-equivalent yield on securities, which was completed on January 3, 2007. In addition, as lower yielding investments purchased in a higher rate environment matured, were called or paid down in 2007, the funds were reinvested at higher rates.


Interest income from commercial and industrial loans and commercial real estate loans increased $1.2 milliondecreased 57 basis points to 4.56% for the year ended December 31, 20072009 from the year ended December 31, 2006. In accordance with Westfield Bank’s strategic plan, the average balance of commercial and industrial loans and commercial real estate loans increased $13.7 million to $282.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to $269.2 million5.13% for the same period in 2006.


Interest income from residential real estate loans increased $250,0002008 due to $6.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $6.4 million for the same period in 2006. The average balance of residential real estate loans decreased $664,000 to $109.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 from $110.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. The average balance of home equity loans increased $6.4 million to $33.4 million but was offset by payments and payoffs in other areas.

enduring low interest rate environment.

Interest Expense.Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2007 increased $3.82009 decreased $2.3 million to $23.4$20.0 million from the comparable 20062008 period.  This was attributable to a decrease in the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities increasingof 55 basis points to 3.50%2.47% for the year ended December 31, 20072009 from 2.95%3.02% for the same period in 2006. In addition, the average balance of total interest-bearing liabilities increased $7.0 million to $669.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 from $662.2 million for the same period in 2006.2008.  The increasedecrease in the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities was primarily due to an increase in the cost of time deposits resulting from the risingenduring low interest rate environment.  Interest expense onAdditionally, management utilized sources of lower-cost funding, such as long-term debt and short-term borrowings, to control overall funding costs.

Net Interest and long-term debtDividend Income.  Net interest and dividend income increased $1.6$756,000 to $32.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007.2009 as compared to $31.8 million for same period in 2008.  The average balance of short-term borrowingsnet interest margin, on a tax-equivalent basis, was 3.04% and long-term debt increased $27.7 million to $92.8 millio n at3.23% for the years ended December 31, 2007. In addition, the average cost of short-term borrowings2009 and long-term debt increased 66 basis points to 4.17%2008, respectively.  The change in net interest and dividend income for the year ended December 31, 2007 from 3.51% for the same period in 2006.


Net Interest and Dividend Income.Net interest and dividend income increased $7.3 million to $30.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 as compared to $22.9 million for same period in 2006. The net interest margin, on a tax equivalent basis, was 3.25% and 3.05% for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase in net interest margin2009 was primarily the result of a decrease in interest expense of $2.3 million from the reinvestmentcomparable 2008 period resulting from a 55 basis point decrease in the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities, partially offset by an decrease in interest and dividend income of $1.6 million resulting from a 58 basis point decrease in the proceedsaverage yield of Westfield Financial’s second step stock offering, whichinterest-earning assets.  The enduring low rate environment was completedthe cause for the basis point decrease in both the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities and the average yield on January 3, 2007.




69




interest-earning assets.

45

Provision for Loan Losses.The provision for loan losses is reviewed by management based upon itsour evaluation of then-existing economic and business conditions affecting theour key lending areas of Westfield Financial and other conditions, such as new loan products, credit quality trends (including trends in nonperforming loans expected to result from existing conditions), collateral values, loan volumes and concentrations, specific industry conditions within portfolio segments that existed as of the balance sheet date and the impact that such conditions were believed to have had on the collectability of the loan portfolio.


The amount that Westfield Bankwe provided for the provision for loan losses during the year ended December 31, 20072009 was based upon the changes that occurred in the loan portfolio during that same period.period as well as the continued weakening of the local and national economy. The changes in the loan portfolio, described in detail below, include a decreasean increase in net loan charge-offs, temperedpartially offset by an increasea decrease in commercial and industrial loans and commercial real estate loans and an increase in nonperformingcommercial real estate loans.  After evaluating these factors, Westfield Bankwe provided $400,000$3.9 million for loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2007,2009, compared to $390,000$3.5 million for the same period in 2006.2008.  The allowance was $5.7$7.6 million at December 31, 20072009 and $5.4$8.8 million at December 31, 2006.

2008.  The allowance for loan losses was 1.60% of total loans at December 31, 2009 and 1.83% at December 31, 2008.  At December 31, 2008, the allowance for loan losses included a specific valuation allowance of $2.1 million related to a manufacturing commercial loan relationship.  This amount was charged off in the first quarter of 2009 and contributed to the decrease in the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for loan losses as a percent of total loans.


For the year ended December 31, 2007, Westfield Bank2009, we recorded net charge-offs of $111,000$5.1 million compared to net charge-offs of $375,000$383,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006.2008.  The 20072009 period was comprised of charge-offs of $317,000$5.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2007,2009, partially offset by recoveries of $206,000$48,000 for the same period.  The 2006increase in charge offs for the year 2009 was primarily due to three unrelated commercial loan relationships which resulted in charge offs totaling $4.7 million, the majority of which occurred in the first half of 2009.  The 2008 period was comprised of charge-offs of $584,000$449,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006,2008, partially offset by recoveries of $209,000$66,000 for the same period.


Nonperforming loans increased $174,000 to $1.2 million at

At December 31, 2007 from $1.0 million at December 31, 2006. Nonperforming residential real estate loans increased $89,000 to $995,000 at December 31, 2007 from $906,000 at December 31, 2006. The majority of nonperforming residential real estate loans have balances under $80,000, are collateralized by first liens and are seasoned, i.e. originated more than five years ago. Nonperforming2009, commercial and industrial loans decreased $25,000 to $19,000 at December 31, 2007 from $44,000 at December 31, 2006. The balance of nonperforming commercial and industrial loans as of December 31, 2007 was comprised of a single loan relationship.


At December 31, 2007, commercial and industrial loans increased $16.3$8.8 million to $116.5$145.0 million compared to December 31, 2006. Westfield Bank considers2008.  We consider these types of loans to contain more credit risk and market risk than both commercial real estate loans and conventional residential real estate mortgages.  Commercial real estate loans increased by $15.4$5.2 million to $189.9$229.1 million at December 31, 2007.

2008.


Nonperforming loans decreased $3.3 million to $5.5 million at December 31, 2009 from $8.8 million at December 31, 2008.  This represented 1.15 % of total loans at December 31, 2009 and 1.83% of total loans at December 31, 2008.  The decrease in nonperforming loans was related to the previously mentioned single commercial manufacturing relationship of $5.5 million.  The underlying business was sold in 2009 and resulted in a charge-off of $3.1 million.

Although management believes it has established and maintained the allowance for loan losses at adequate levels, future adjustments may be necessary if economic, real estate and other conditions differ substantially from the current operating environment.




70




Noninterest Income.Noninterest income increased $1.5 milliondecreased $365,000 to $4.6$3.2 million for the year ended December 31, 20072009 compared to $3.1$3.5 million for the same period in 2006. 2008.

The 2007 results include a pre-tax gainyears ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 included net impairment losses of $546,000$278,000 and $1.3 million, respectively, on securities that were determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired.  The 2009 impairment losses were on two private-label residential mortgage-backed securities.  The fair value of these securities was $4.5 million at December 31, 2009.  The 2008 impairment loss was primarily due to write-downs of $961,000 on preferred stock issued by Freddie Mac, which was placed into conservatorship by the U. S. Treasury in September 2008.  Our book value remaining on preferred stock issued by Freddie Mac was $39,000 at December 31, 2009.  In addition, we recorded net losses on the salesales of a piecesecurities of vacant land in Feeding Hills, Massachusetts. The results for the 2007 year also include a pre-tax gain of $315,000 resulting from the curtailment of a defined benefit plan, specifically pertaining to providing a life insurance benefit to employees who retire from Westfield Bank. The results$383,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006 included2009.  For the year ended December 31, 2008, net gains on sales of securities were $1.1 million.
46


For the year ended December 31, 2009, income from service charges and fees increased $248,000 to $2.6 million, compared to $2.4 million for the comparable 2008 period.   This increase was due to income from the third-party mortgage program and bank-owned life insurance.  Income from the third-party mortgage program increased $473,000 to $572,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to $99,000 in the comparable 2008 period.  During the year, we experienced an increase in mortgage referrals due to a pre-tax loss of $378,000 on the sale of premises, which was the result of the sale of a building that previously housed Westfield Bank’s branchdecrease in downtown Springfield, Massachusetts.


Incomeinterest rates.  In addition, income from bank-owned life insurance increased $459,000$103,000 to $1.3$1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 20072009 compared to the same period in 2006.2008.  This was primarily the result of a $11.2$2.6 million increase in the average balance of bank-owned life insurance in 20072009 compared to 2006.

2008.


Net checking account processing fee income decreased $301,000

Noninterest Expense.  Noninterest expense for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $25.0 million compared to $23.3 million for the same period in 2008.  This increase was primarily due to an increase of $1.0 million in FDIC insurance expense to $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 20072009, compared to $1.4 million for$89,000 during the same period in 2006. This was primarily the result of a decrease in fees collected from customers who overdraw their checking accounts.


Noninterest Expense.Noninterest expense for the year ended December 31, 2007 was $21.8 million compared to $19.4 million for the same period in 2006. This2008.  The increase was primarily due to an increasehigher FDIC insurance assessments nationwide and a special assessment of $1.8 million in salaries$453,000 at June 30, 2009.  Salaries and benefits increased $295,000 to $13.7$15.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. Salaries expense increased $1.2 million as a2009, primarily the result of hiring new employees and normal increasesa $526,000 increase in costs related to the employee salaries. A portion of the new hiringdefined benefit pension plan.  This was partially offset by a $207,000 decrease in salary expenses associated with a new Westfield Bank branch which openedemployee bonuses.


Income Taxes. The provision for business during the second quarter of 2007. Expenses relatedincome taxes decreased $500,000 to share-based compensation increased $848,000 for the year ended December 31, 2007 as a result of new grants of restricted stock and stock options in the third quarter of 2007, along with expenses related to Westfield Financial’s tax-qualified employee stock ownership plan.


Professional services expense increased $319,000 to $1.4$1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 20072009, compared to $1.1$1.8 million for the same period in 2006. This was primarily the result of expenses related to corporate legal matters and fees paid to an industry consultant.


Income Taxes.Income taxes increased $2.3 million to $3.8 million primarily as a result of an increase in income before income taxes.comparable 2008 period.  The effective tax rate was 30.5%18.8% for the year ended December 31, 20072009 and 24.7%21.2% for the same period in 2006.2008.  The increasedecrease in the tax provision and effective tax rate in the 2009 period is due primarily to a reduction in tax advantagedlower pre-tax income while maintaining the same level of tax-advantaged income such as a percentageBOLI and tax-exempt municipal obligations.  The 2008 period also includes the utilization of income before income taxes.

prior years’ loss carry forwards against gains on the sales of securities.




71




Liquidity and Capital Resources


The term “liquidity” refers to Westfield Financial’sour ability to generate adequate amounts of cash to fund loan originations, loan purchases, deposit withdrawals and operating expenses.  Westfield Financial’sOur primary sources of liquidity are deposits, scheduled amortization and prepayments of loan principal and mortgage-backed securities, maturities and calls of investment securities and funds provided by our operations.  Westfield BankWe also can borrow funds from the Federal Home Loan BankFHLB based on eligible collateral of loans and securities.  Outstanding borrowings from the Federal Home Loan BankFHLB were $143.5$202.2 million at December 31, 20082010 and $123.4$185.5 million at December 31, 2007.2009.  At December 31, 2008, Westfield Bank2010, we had $188.7$57.0 million in available borrowing capacity with the Federal Home Loan Bank. Westfield Bank hasFHLB.  We have the ability to increase itsour borrowing capacity with the Federal Home Loan BankFHLB by pledging investment secu ritiessecurities or loans.  In addition, Westfield Bankwe may enter into reverse repurchase agreements with approved broker-dealers.  Reverse repurchase agreements are agreements that allow Westfield Bankus to borrow money using itsour securities as collateral.


Westfield Bank

We also hashave outstanding at any time, a significant number of commitments to extend credit and provide financial guarantees to third parties.  These arrangements are subject to strict credit control assessments.  Guarantees specify limits to Westfield Bank’sour obligations.  Because many commitments and almost all guarantees expire without being funded in whole or in part, the contract amounts are not estimates of future cash flows.  Westfield Bank isWe are also obligated under agreements with the Federal Home Loan BankFHLB to repay borrowed funds and isare obligated under leases for certain of itsour branches and equipment.  A summary of lease obligations, borrowings, and credit commitments at December 31, 20082010 follows:

47


 

Within
1 Year

 

After 1 Year
but Within
3 Years

 

After 3 Years
but Within
5 Years

 

After
5 Years

 

Total

 

(In thousands)

Lease Obligations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Operating lease obligations

$         524

 

$    1,014

 

$       809

 

$  10,667

 

$    13,014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Borrowings and Debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Federal Home Loan Bank

 73,550

 

 45,000

 

 20,000

 

 5,000

 

 143,550

    Securities sold under agreements
      to repurchase

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 58,300

 

 58,300

        Total borrowings and debt

 73,550

 

 45,000

 

 20,000

 

 63,300

 

 201,850

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Credit Commitments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Available lines of credit

 54,319

 

 -

 

 -

 

 14,903

 

 69,222

    Other loan commitments

 17,905

 

 -

 

 -

 

-

 

 17,905

    Letters of credit

 5,703

 

 -

 

 -

 

 243

 

 5,946

        Total credit commitments

 77,927

 

 -

 

 -

 

 15,146

 

 93,073

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

$  152,001

 

$  46,014

 

$  20,809

 

$  89,113

 

$  307,937

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




72




   
Within 1
Year
  
After 1
Year
But Within
3 Years
  
After 3
Year
But Within
5 Years
  
After 5
Years
  Total 
Lease Obligations               
Operating lease obligations $565  $939  $898  $10,137  $12,539 
                     
Borrowings and Debt                    
Federal Home Loan Bank  55,751   66,254   66,224   14,000   202,229 
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase  17,559   14,800   28,000   38,500   98,859 
Total borrowings and debt  73,310   81,054   94,224   52,500   301,088 
                     
Credit Commitments                    
Available lines of credit  60,305   -   -   20,073   80,378 
Other loan commitments  6,804   -   50   -   6,854 
Letters of credit  2,527   -   -   505   3,032 
Total credit commitments  69,636   -   50   20,578   90,264 
                     
Total $143,511  $81,993  $95,172  $83,215  $403,891 
Maturing investment securities are a relatively predictable source of funds.  However, deposit flows, calls of securities and prepayments of loans and mortgage-backed securities are strongly influenced by interest rates, general and local economic conditions and competition in the marketplace.  These factors reduce the predictability of the timing of these sources of funds.


Westfield Financial’s

Our primary investing activities are the origination of commercial real estate, commercial and industrial and consumer loans, and the purchase of mortgage-backed and other investment securities.  During the year ended December 31, 2008, Westfield Bank2010, we originated loans of approximately $141.2$76.8 million, and during the comparable period of 2007, Westfield Bank2009, we originated loans of approximately $128.6$106.6 million.  Under Westfield Bank’sour residential real estate loan program, Westfield Bank refers itswe refer our residential real estate borrowers to a third partythird-party mortgage company and substantially all of Westfield Bank’sour residential real estate loans are underwritten, originated and serviced by a third partythird-party mortgage company.  Purchases of securities totaled $223.0$717.0 million for the year ended December 31, 20082010 and $230.7$426.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2007.2009.  At December 31, 2008, Westfield Bank2010, we had loan commitments to bo rrowersborrowers of approximately $ 12.6$9.9 million, and available home equity and unadvanced lines of credit of approximately $80.5$80.4 million.


Deposit flows are affected by the level of interest rates, by the interest rates and products offered by competitors and by other factors.  Total deposits decreased $14.7increased $52.3 million and $24.860.0 million during the years ended December 31, 20082010 and 2007,2009, respectively.  Time deposit accounts scheduled to mature within one year were $245.9$236.9 million at December 31, 2008.2010.  Based on Westfield Bank’sour deposit retention experience and current pricing strategy, it anticipateswe anticipate that a significant portion of these certificates of deposit will remain on deposit.  Westfield Bank monitors itsWe monitor our liquidity position frequently and anticipatesanticipate that it will have sufficient funds to meet itsour current funding commitments.


At December 31, 2008,2010, Westfield Financial and the Bank exceeded each of the applicable regulatory capital requirements.  Westfield Bank’sFinancial had tier 1 leverage capital was $219.7of $224.3 million, or 20.51%18.1% to adjusted total assets. Westfield Bank’sassets, tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets was $219.7of $224.3 million, or 34.52%. Westfield Bank had33.0%, and total capital to risk weighted assets of $226.3$231.3 million or 35.55%34.1%.


Westfield Financial does  The Bank had tier 1 leverage capital of $214.7 million, or 17.4% to adjusted total assets, tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets of $214.7 million or 31.7%, and total capital to risk weighted assets of $221.6 million or 32.7%.  See Footnote 10, Regulatory Capital, of our notes to consolidated financial statements for further information on our regulatory requirements.

48

We do not anticipate any material capital expenditures during calendar year 2009,2010, nor do we have any balloon or other payments due on any long-term obligations or any off-balance sheet items other than the commitments and unused lines of credit noted above.


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements


Westfield Financial does

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, other than noted above, that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.




73




Management of Market Risk

As a financial institution, Westfield Financial’sour primary market risk is interest rate risk since substantially all transactions are denominated in U.S. dollars with no direct foreign exchange or changes in commodity price exposure.  Fluctuations in interest rates will affect both our level of income and expense on a large portion of our assets and liabilities.  Fluctuations in interest rates will also affect the market value of all interest-earning assets.

The primary goal of Westfield Financial’sour interest rate management strategy is to limit fluctuations in net interest income as interest rates vary up or down and control variations in the market value of assets, liabilities and net worth as interest rates vary. Westfield Financial seeksWe seek to coordinate asset and liability decisions so that, under changing interest rate scenarios, net interest income will remain within an acceptable range.


To achieve the objectives of managing interest rate risk, Westfield Bank’sthe Asset and Liability Management Committee meets monthly to discuss and monitor the market interest rate environment relative to interest rates that are offered on itsour products.  The Asset and Liability Management Committee presents periodic reports to theour Board of Directors of Westfield Bank and Westfield Financial, Inc. at their regular meetings.

In recent years, Westfield Bank’s lending activities have emphasized commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans.Commercial real estate loans have grown $33.9 million or 17.8% since December 31, 2007. Commercial and industrial loans have grown $37.3 million or 32.1% since December 31, 2007. Management believes that Westfield Bank’s increased emphasis on commercial lending has allowed it to diversify its loan portfolio while continuing to meet the needs of the businesses and individuals that it serves.

Westfield Bank’s


Our primary source of funds has been deposits, consisting primarily of time deposits, money market accounts, savings accounts, demand accounts and NOWinterest bearing checking accounts, which have shorter terms to maturity than the loan portfolio.  Several strategies have been employed to manage the interest rate risk inherent in the asset/liability mix, including but not limited to:

maintaining the diversity of Westfield Bank’s existing loan portfolio through the origination of commercial loans and commercial real estate loans which typically have variable rates and shorter terms than residential mortgages; and

emphasizing investments with an expected average duration of five years or less.

maintaining the diversity of our existing loan portfolio through the origination of commercial loans and commercial real estate loans which typically have variable rates and shorter terms than residential mortgages; and
emphasizing investments with an expected average duration of five years or less.
In addition, emphasis on commercial loans has reduced the average maturity of Westfield Bank’sour loan portfolio.  Moreover, the actual amount of time before loans are repaid can be significantly affected by changes in market interest rates.  Prepayment rates will also vary due to a number of other factors, including the regional economy in the area where the loans were originated, seasonal factors, demographic variables and the assumability of the loans.  However, the major factors affecting prepayment rates are prevailing interest rates, related financing opportunities and competition.  Westfield Financial monitorsWe monitor interest rate sensitivity so that itwe can adjust itsour asset and liability mix in a timely manner and minimize the negative effects of changing rates.




74




Each of Westfield Bank’sour sources of liquidity is vulnerable to various uncertainties beyond the control of Westfield Bank.our control.  Scheduled loan and security payments are a relatively stable source of funds, while loan and security prepayments and calls, and deposit flows vary widely in reaction to market conditions, primarily prevailing interest rates. Asset sales are influenced by pledging activities, general market interest rates and unforeseen market conditions. Westfield Bank’sOur financial condition is affected by itsour ability to borrow at attractive rates, retain deposits at market rates and other market conditions. Management considers Westfield Bank’sWe consider our sources of liquidity to be adequate to meet expected funding needs and also to be responsive to changing interest rate markets.


49

Net Interest and Dividend Income Simulation.  We use a simulation model to monitor interest rate risk.  This model reports the net interest income at risk primarily under seven different interest rate environments.  Specifically, net interest income is measured in one scenario that assumes no change in interest rates, and six scenarios where interest rates increase 100, 200, 300 and 300400 and decrease 100 200 and 300200 basis points, respectively, from current rates over the one year time period following the current consolidated financial statements.


The changes in interest income and interest expense due to changes in interest rates reflect the rate sensitivity of our interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities.  For example, in a rising interest rate environment, the interest income from an adjustable rate loan is likely to increase depending on its repricing characteristics while the interest income from a fixed rate loan would not increase until the funds were repaid and loaned out at a higher interest rate.


The tables below set forth as of December 31, 20082010 the estimated changes in net interest and dividend income that would result from incremental changes in interest rates over the applicable twelve-month period.


For the Year Ending December 31, 2009

(Dollars in thousands)

Changes in
Interest Rates
(Basis Points)

 

Net Interest and
Dividend
Income

 

% Change

300

 

35,127

 

3.5%

200

 

34,613

 

2.0%

100

 

34,058

 

0.4%

0

 

33,925

 

0.0%

-100

 

33,669

 

-0.8%

-200

 

33,217

 

-2.1%

-300

 

32,868

 

-3.1%


 
For the Year Ending December 31, 2011
 
Changes in
Interest Rates
(Basis Points)
 
Net Interest and
Dividend
Income
  
 
% Change
 
(Dollars in thousands) 
        
400  33,600  4.5% 
300  33,369  3.8% 
200  33,087  2.9% 
100  32,896  2.3% 
0  32,143  0.0% 
-100  31,838  -0.9% 
-200  29,567  -8.0 % 
Market rates were assumed to increase 100, 200, 300 and 300400 basis points and decrease 100 200 and 300200 basis points, in even increments over the twelve month period.  The repricing and/or new rates of assets and liabilities moved in tandem with market rates.  However, in certain deposit products, the use of data from a historical analysis indicated that the rates on these products would move only a fraction of the rate change amount.




75




We have developed consolidated balance sheet growth projections for the twelve month period.  The same product mix and growth strategy was used for all rate change simulations, except for the shift into term deposits in certain scenarios as described in the previous paragraph. Income from tax-exempt assets is calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis.


Pertinent data from each loan account, deposit account and investment security was used to calculate future cash flows.  The data included such items as maturity date, payment amount, next repricing date, repricing frequency, repricing index and spread.  Prepayment speed assumptions were based upon the difference between the account rate and the current market rate.


The income simulation analysis was based upon a variety of assumptions.  These assumptions include but are not limited to balance sheet growth, asset mix, prepayment speeds, the timing and level of interest rates, and the shape of the yield curve.  As market conditions vary from the assumptions in the income simulation analysis, actual results will differ.  As a result, the income simulation analysis does not serve as a forecast of net interest income, nor do the calculations represent any actions that management may undertake in response to changes in interest rates.


Recent Accounting Pronouncements


In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The definition of fair value retains the exchange price notion in earlier definitions of fair value. This Statement clarifies that the exchange price is the price in an orderly transaction between market participants

Refer to sell the asset or transfer the liability in the market in which the reporting entity would transact for the asset or liability, that is, the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability. Emphasis is placed on fair value being a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement, and therefore a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assu mptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering these market participant assumptions, a fair value hierarchy has been established to distinguish between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from sources independentNote 1 of the reporting entity (observable inputs) and (2) the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). In February 2008, the FASB issued a Staff Position which delays the effective date of Statement No. 157 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis,Notes to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. Westfield Financial adopted this statement, except for items covered by the Staff Position, as of January 1, 2008 and the adoption did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.




76




In October 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When The Market for That Asset Is Not Active (“FSP 157-3”). FSP 157-3 clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157 in a market that is not active and provides an example to illustrate key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that financial asset is not active. FSP 157-3 was effective immediately upon issuance, and includes prior periods for which financial statements have not been issued. This Statement did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2008.


In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115.” This Statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value, which the objective of improving financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions, and is expected to expand the use of fair value measurement. An entity will report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. The fair value option may generally be applied instrument by instrument and is irrevocable. This Statement was adopted by Westfield Financial on January 1, 200 8 and did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.


In June 2007, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 06-11, “Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards,” which requires an entity to recognize, as an increase to additional paid-in capital, the income taxes benefits related to dividends that are charged to retained earnings for unvested equity shares or options. This EITF was adopted on January 1, 2008 and did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements of Westfield Financial.


In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“Statement No. 141(R)”). Statement No. 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer in a business combination recognizes and measures identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and noncontrolling interests in the acquiree. Statement No. 141(R) further addresses how goodwill acquired or a gain from a bargain purchase is to be recognized and measured and determines what disclosures are needed to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the effects of the business combination. Statement No. 141(R) is effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier application is not permitted.


In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an amendmentfor a summary of ARB No. 51.” This Statement establishesthe recent accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. This Statement is on January 1, 2009 and did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements of Westfield Financial.

pronouncements.

50


In March of 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.” This Statement changes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses



77




derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. This Statement is effective for on January 1, 2009 and did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements of Westfield Financial.


In December 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 132(R)-1, “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets” (“FSP 132(R)-1”). FSP 132(R)-1 amends FASB Statement No. 132 (revised 2003), “Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits”, to provide guidance on an employer’s disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. This staff position requires disclosure of information about how investment allocation decisions are made, the fair value of each major category of plan assets and the inputs and valuation techniques used to develop fair value measurements. Also, an employer shall provide users of financial statements with an understanding of significant concentrations of risk in plan assets. In addition, it requires a nonpublic entity that sponsors one or more defined benefit pension or postretireme nt plans to disclose the net periodic benefit cost recognized for each annual period for which an annual statement of income is presented. The disclosures about plan assets are required for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009 and are not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements of Westfield Financial. The requirement to disclose the net periodic benefit cost is effective as of December 31, 2008. This disclosure has been provided in these consolidated financial statements and did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2008. Upon initial adoption of FSP 132(R)-1, disclosures are not required for earlier periods that are presented for comparative purposes.


In January 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. EITF 99-20-1, “Amendments to the Impairment Guidance of EITF Issue No. 99-20” (“FSP 99-20-1”). FSP 99-20-1 amends the impairment guidance in EITF Issue No. 99-20, “Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests That Continue to Be Held by a Transferor in Securitized Financial Assets,” to achieve more consistent determination of whether an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred. The FSP also retains and emphasizes the objective of an other-than-temporary impairment assessment and the related disclosure requirements in FASB Statement No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,” and other related guidance. FSP 99-20-1 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after December 15, 2008. This Statement did not have a material impact o n the consolidated financial statements of Westfield Financial at December 31, 2008.




78




Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices


The

Our Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Notes of Westfield Financial have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).  GAAP generally requires the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without consideration for changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation.  The impact of inflation is reflected in the increased cost of Westfield Financial’sour operations.  Unlike industrial companies, Westfield Financial’sour assets and liabilities are primarily monetary in nature.  As a result, changes in market interest rates have a greater impact on performance than do the effects of inflation.


ITEM 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

See Item 7,“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Management of Market Risk,” for a discussion of quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk.


ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA


The

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Our Consolidated Financial Statements of Westfield Financial may be found on pages F-1 through F-44 of this report.


ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ONACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE


None.


ITEM 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES


CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures


Management, including Westfield Financial’sour President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, has evaluated the effectiveness of Westfield Financial’sour disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report.  Based upon that evaluation, Westfield Financial’sour Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports Westfield Financial fileswe file and submitssubmit under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required and (ii) accumulated and communicated to Westfield Financial’sour management including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, as appropriate to allow timely discussion regarding required disclosure.




79




There have been no changes in Westfield Financial’sour internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation that occurred during Westfield Financial’sour last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or that is reasonably likely to materially affect, Westfield Financial’sour internal control over financial reporting.


Management Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting


The management of Westfield Financial is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Westfield Financial’s internal control system is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance to Westfield Financial’s management and board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.  Our internal control system is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance to our management and board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.

Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurances that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the directors; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.
51

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010.  In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework.  Based on our assessment we believe that, as of December 31, 2010, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm

Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm has issued an audit report on our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, which appears on page F-1.

ITEM 9B.                      OTHER INFORMATION

None.
52

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The following information included in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference: “Information About Our Board of Directors,” “Information About Our Executive Officers,” “Corporate Governance,” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.”
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following information included in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference: “Corporate Governance – Compensation Committee Interlocks,” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Compensation Committee Report,” and “Compensation of Directors and Executive Officers.”
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following information included in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference: “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Securities Authorized For Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans.”

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The following information included in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference: “Transactions with Certain Related Persons” and “Board of Directors Independence.”
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The following information included in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference: “Principal Accounting Fees and Services.”
53


EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)(1)
Financial Statements
Reference is made to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II hereof.
(a)(2)
Financial Statement Schedules
Consolidated financial statement schedules have been omitted because the required information is not present, or not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedules, or because the required information is provided in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
(a)(3)
Exhibits
The exhibits required to be filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K are listed in the Exhibit Index attached hereto and are incorporated herein by reference.

54

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on March 11, 2011.
Westfield Financial, Inc.
By:/s/ James C. Hagan
James C. Hagan
Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ Leo R. Sagan, Jr.
Leo R. Sagan, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
55

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and any rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
NameTitleDate
/s/ James C. HaganChief Executive Officer, President and DirectorMarch 11, 2011
 James C. Hagan(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Donald A. WilliamsChairman of the BoardMarch 11, 2011
Donald A. Williams
/s/ Victor J. CarraDirectorMarch 11, 2011
Victor J. Carra
/s/ David C. Colton, Jr.DirectorMarch 11, 2011
David C. Colton, Jr.
/s/ Robert T. Crowley, Jr.DirectorMarch 11, 2011
Robert T. Crowley, Jr.
/s/ Harry C. LaneDirectorMarch 11, 2011
Harry C. Lane
/s/ Richard C. PlacekDirectorMarch 11, 2011
Richard C. Placek
/s/ Paul R. PohlDirectorMarch 11, 2011
Paul R. Pohl
/s/ Philip R. SmithDirectorMarch 11, 2011
Philip R. Smith
/s/ Charles E. SullivanDirectorMarch 11, 2011
Charles E. Sullivan

EXHIBIT INDEX


2.1  Amended and Restated Plan of Conversion and Stock Issuance of Westfield Mutual Holding Company, Westfield Financial, Inc. and Westfield Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Registration Statement No. 333-137024 on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 31, 2006).
3.1  Articles of Organization of Westfield Financial, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 5, 2007).
3.2†Amended and Restated Bylaws of Westfield Financial, Inc.
4.1  Form of Stock Certificate of Westfield Financial, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Registration Statement No. 333-137024 on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 31, 2006).
10.1*Form of Employee Stock Ownership Plan of Westfield Financial, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registration Statement No. 333-68550 on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 28, 2001).
10.2*Amendment to the Employee Stock Ownership Plan of Westfield Financial, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003).
10.3*Amendment No. 1 to the Employee Stock Ownership Plan of Westfield Financial, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2004).
10.4*Amendment No. 3 (incorporating Amendment Nos. 1 and 2) to the Employee Stock Ownership Plan of Westfield Financial, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 25, 2005).
10.5*Amendment No. 4 to the Employee Stock Ownership Plan of Westfield Financial, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2010).
10.6†Amendment No. 5 to the Employee Stock Ownership Plan of Westfield Financial, Inc.
10.7*Form of Director’s Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 22, 2005).
10.8*The 401(k) Plan adopted by Westfield Bank (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement No. 333-73132 on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 28, 2006).
10.9*Amendment to the 401(k) Plan adopted by Westfield Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 13, 2006).
10.10*Amended and Restated Benefit Restoration Plan of Westfield Financial, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 25, 2007).
10.11Form of Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Agreement with Donald A. Williams (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 22, 2005).
10.12Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between James C. Hagan and Westfield Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 5, 2009).
10.13Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between James C. Hagan and Westfield Financial, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 5, 2009).
10.14Agreement between Westfield Bank and Village Mortgage Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 of Amendment No. 1 of the Registration Statement No. 333-137024 on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 31, 2006).

10.15*Employment Agreement between Leo R. Sagan, Jr. and Westfield Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 5, 2009).
10.16*Employment Agreement between Leo R. Sagan, Jr. and Westfield Financial, Inc (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 of the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 5, 2009).
10.17*Employment Agreement between Gerald P. Ciejka and Westfield Bank  (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 of the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 5, 2009).
10.18*Employment Agreement between Gerald P. Ciejka and Westfield Financial, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 of the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 5, 2009).
10.19*Employment Agreement between Allen J. Miles, III and Westfield Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 5, 2009).
10.20*Employment Agreement between Allen J. Miles, III and Westfield Financial, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 of the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 5, 2009).
10.21*2002 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix B of the Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 24, 2002).
10.22*Amendment to the 2002 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix A of the Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 25, 2003).
10.23*2002 Recognition and Retention Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix C of the Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 24, 2002).
10.24*Amendment to the 2002 Recognition and Retention Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix B of the Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 25, 2003).
10.25*2007 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix A of the Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 18, 2007).
10.26Amendment to the 2007 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix B of the Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 14, 2008).
10.27*2007 Recognition and Retention Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix B of the Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 18, 2007).
10.28Amendment to the 2007 Recognition and Retention Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix C of the Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 14, 2008).
21.1†Subsidiaries of Westfield Financial
23.1†Consent of Wolf & Company, P.C.
31.1†Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2†Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1†Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2†Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

†           Filed herewith.
*           Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Westfield Financial, Inc.


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Westfield Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010.  We also have audited Westfield Financial, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).  Westfield Financial, Inc.’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.  Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk.  Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America,accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the directors of Westfield Financial’s;the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of Westfield Financial’sthe company's assets that could have a material effect on ourthe financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


Westfield Financial, Inc.’s management assessed the effectiveness of Westfield Financial’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission inInternal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on our assessment we believe that, as of December 31, 2008, Westfield Financial’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.


Westfield Financial Inc.’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm has issued an audit report on the effective operation of Westfield Financial’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008. This report appears on pages F-45 and F-46.


ITEM 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION


None.




80




PART III


ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


The following information included in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference: “Information About Our Board of Directors,” “Information About Our Executive Officers,” “Corporate Governance,” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.”


ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


The following information included in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference: “Transactions with Related Persons – Compensation Committee Interlocks,” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Compensation Committee Report,” and “Executive and Director Compensation Tables.”


ITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS


The following information included in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference: “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans.”


ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE


The following information included in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference: “Transactions with Certain Related Persons” and “Board of Directors Independence.”


ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES


The following information included in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference: “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees and Services.”




81




PART IV


ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES


a.

Financial Statements


Reference is made to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II hereof.


b.

Exhibits


2.1

Amended and Restated Plan of Conversion and Stock Issuance of Westfield Mutual Holding Company, Westfield Financial, Inc. and Westfield Bank. (1)

3.1

Articles of Organization of Westfield Financial, Inc. (2)

3.2

Bylaws of Westfield Financial, Inc. (2)

4.1

Form of Stock Certificate of Westfield Financial, Inc. (1)

10.1

Form of Employee Stock Ownership Plan of Westfield Financial, Inc. (3)

10.2

Amendments to the Employee Stock Ownership Plan of Westfield Financial, Inc. (4)

10.3

Form of Director’s Deferred Compensation Plan. (5)

10.4

The 401(k) Plan adopted by Westfield Bank. (6)

10.5

Amended and Restated Benefit Restoration Plan of Westfield Financial, Inc. (7)

10.6

Form of Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Agreement with Donald A. Williams. (5)

10.7

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Donald A. Williams and Westfield Bank. (7)

10.8

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Michael J. Janosco, Jr. and Westfield Bank. (7)

10.9

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between James C. Hagan and Westfield Bank. (8)

10.10

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Donald A. Williams and Westfield Financial, Inc. (7)

10.11

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Michael J. Janosco, Jr. and Westfield Financial, Inc. (7)



82





10.12

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between James C. Hagan and Westfield Financial, Inc. (8)

10.13

Form of Amended and Restated Change in Control Agreement by and among certain officers, Westfield Financial, Inc. and Westfield Bank. (7)

10.14

Agreement between Westfield Bank and Village Mortgage Company. (1)

10.15

Employment Agreement between Leo R. Sagan, Jr. and Westfield Bank (8)

10.16

Employment Agreement between Leo R. Sagan, Jr. and Westfield Financial, Inc. (8)

10.17

Employment Agreement between Gerald P. Ciejka and Westfield Bank (8)

10.18

Employment Agreement between Gerald P. Ciejka and Westfield Financial, Inc. (8)

10.19

Employment Agreement between Allen J. Miles, III and Westfield Bank (8)

10.20

Employment Agreement between Allen J. Miles, III and Westfield Financial, Inc. (8)

23.1

Consent of Wolf & Company, P.C.

31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*


 *

Filed herewith.


(1)

Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement No. 333-137024 on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 31, 2006, as amended.

(2)

Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 5, 2007.

(3)

Incorporated herein by reference to the Registration Statement No. 333-68550 on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 28, 2001, as amended.

(4)

Incorporated by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.

(5)

Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 22, 2005.

(6)

Incorporated herein by reference to the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement No. 333-73132 on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 28, 2006.

(7)

Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 29, 2007.

(8)

Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 5, 2009.



83




SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on March 13, 2009.


WESTFIELD FINANCIAL, INC.

By:

/s/ James C. Hagan

James C. Hagan
Chief Executive Officer








Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and any rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


Name

Title

Date

/s/ James C. Hagan

Chief Executive Officer and President

March 13, 2009

 James C. Hagan

(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Leo R. Sagan, Jr.

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

March 13, 2009

Leo R. Sagan, Jr.

(Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/ Donald A. Williams

Chairman of the Board

March 13, 2009

Donald A. Williams

/s/ Victor J. Carra

Director

March 13, 2009

Victor J. Carra

/s/ David C. Colton, Jr.

Director

March 13, 2009

David C. Colton, Jr.

/s/ Robert T. Crowley, Jr.

Director

March 13, 2009

Robert T. Crowley, Jr.

/s/ Harry C. Lane

Director

March 13, 2009

Harry C. Lane

/s/ Mary C. O’Neil

Director

March 13, 2009

Mary C. O’Neil

/s/ Richard C. Placek

Director

March 13, 2009

Richard C. Placek

/s/ Paul R. Pohl

Director

March 13, 2009

Paul R. Pohl

/s/ Charles E. Sullivan

Director

March 13, 2009

Charles E. Sullivan







REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Westfield Financial, Inc.



We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Westfield Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008.  These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.  


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


F-1

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Westfield Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20082010 and 2007,2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 20082010 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


We also have audited, Also in accordance with the standards of the Public Accounting Oversight Board (United States),our opinion, Westfield Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries’maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008,2010, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated March 10, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of Westfield Financial, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting.

(COSO).



/s/ WOLF & COMPANY, P.C.


Boston, Massachusetts

March 10, 2009



F-1




WESTFIELD FINANCIAL INC., AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

 

December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

ASSETS

 

 

 

Cash and due from banks

$       11,525 

 

$       16,603 

Federal funds sold

42,338 

 

21,017 

Interest-bearing deposits and other short-term Investments

2,670 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

56,533 

 

37,623 

 

 

 

 

SECURITIES :

 

 

 

Available for sale - at estimated fair value

24,396 

 

38,051 

 

 

 

 

Held to maturity - at amortized cost (estimated fair value of
$82,491 at December 31, 2008, and $105,829  at December 31, 2007)

79,303 

 

104,025 

 

 

 

 

MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES:

 

 

 

Available for sale - at estimated fair value

233,747 

 

206,178 

 

 

 

 

Held to maturity - at amortized cost (estimated fair value of $168,716 at
December 31, 2008, and $174,550 at December 31, 2007)

168,332 

 

174,594 

 

 

 

 

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF BOSTON AND OTHER
RESTRICTED STOCK - AT COST

8,456 

 

7,510 

 

 

 

 

LOANS - Net of allowance for loan losses of $8,796 at December 31, 2008
and $5,726 at December 31, 2007

472,135 

 

414,902 

 

 

 

 

PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT, Net

12,066 

 

12,712 

 

 

 

 

ACCRUED INTEREST RECEIVABLE

5,261 

 

5,761 

 

 

 

 

BANK-OWNED LIFE INSURANCE

36,100 

 

32,398 

 

 

 

 

DEFERRED TAX ASSET, Net

10,521 

 

3,776 

 

 

 

 

OTHER ASSETS

2,206 

 

2,254 

TOTAL ASSETS

$  1,109,056 

 

$  1,039,784 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

 

 

 

LIABILITIES:

 

 

 

DEPOSITS

 

 

 

Noninterest-bearing

$       50,860 

 

$       42,408 

Interest-bearing

537,169 

 

560,268 

Total deposits

588,029 

 

602,676 

 

 

 

 

SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS

49,824 

 

35,268 

 

 

 

 

LONG-TERM DEBT

173,300 

 

105,000 

 

 

 

 

DUE TO BROKER

27,603 

 

2,258 

 

 

 

 

OTHER LIABILITIES

10,381 

 

8,050 

TOTAL LIABILITIES

849,137 

 

753,252 

 

 

 

 

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTE 14)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:

 

 

 

Preferred stock - $.01 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized,

 

None outstanding at December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007

 

 

 

Common stock - $.01 par value, 75,000,000 shares authorized,
31,307,881 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2008;
31,933,549 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2007

313 

 

319 

Additional paid-in capital

204,866 

 

209,497 

Unearned compensation - ESOP

(10,913)

 

(11,542)

Unearned compensation - Equity Incentive Plan

(4,337)

 

(5,493)

Retained earnings

78,898 

 

92,702 

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income

(8,908)

 

1,049 

Total stockholders' equity

259,919 

 

286,532 

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

$  1,109,056 

 

$  1,039,784 


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.



11, 2011

F-2





WESTFIELD FINANCIAL, INC., AND SUBSIDIARIES 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS 
(Dollars in thousands, except share data) 
  December 31, 
  2010  2009 
ASSETS      
Cash and due from banks $9,247  $12,204 
Federal funds sold  13   2 
Interest-bearing deposits and other short-term investments  2,351   16,513 
Cash and cash equivalents  11,611   28,719 
         
SECURITIES :        
Available for sale - at fair value  644,139   319,121 
         
Held to maturity - at amortized cost (fair value of $303,619)  -   295,011 
         
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF BOSTON AND OTHER RESTRICTED STOCK - AT COST  12,251   10,339 
         
LOANS - Net of allowance for loan losses of $6,934 at December 31, 2010 and $7,645 at December 31, 2009  502,392   469,149 
         
PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT, Net  11,603   12,202 
         
ACCRUED INTEREST RECEIVABLE  4,279   5,198 
         
BANK-OWNED LIFE INSURANCE  40,494   38,970 
         
DEFERRED TAX ASSET, Net  8,811   6,995 
         
OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED  223   1,662 
         
OTHER ASSETS  3,686   4,044 
TOTAL ASSETS $1,239,489  $1,191,410 
         
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY        
LIABILITIES:        
DEPOSITS :        
Noninterest-bearing $85,217  $80,110 
Interest-bearing  615,118   567,865 
Total deposits  700,335   647,975 
         
SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS  62,937   74,499 
         
LONG-TERM DEBT  238,151   213,845 
SECURITIES PENDING SETTLEMENT  7,791   - 
OTHER LIABILITIES  9,030   7,792 
TOTAL LIABILITIES  1,018,244   944,111 
         
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 13)        
         
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:        
Preferred stock - $.01 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding at
December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009
  -   - 
Common stock - $.01 par value, 75,000,000 shares authorized, 28,166,419 shares issued
and outstanding at December 31, 2010; 29,818,526 shares issued and outstanding at
December 31, 2009
  282   298 
Additional paid-in capital  181,842   193,609 
Unearned compensation - ESOP  (9,701)  (10,299)
Unearned compensation - Equity Incentive Plan  (2,158)  (3,248)
Retained earnings  56,496   69,253 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (5,516)  (2,314)
Total shareholders' equity  221,245   247,299 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY $1,239,489  $1,191,410 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 
F-3

WESTFIELD FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME 
(Dollars in thousands, except share data) 
  Years Ended December 31, 
  2010  2009  2008 
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME:         
Debt securities, taxable $19,648  $25,090  $24,362 
Residential and commercial real estate loans  18,023   18,312   18,783 
Commercial and industrial loans  6,496   7,150   8,032 
Debt securities, tax-exempt  1,533   1,470   1,389 
Consumer loans  213   263   322 
Equity securities  226   234   574 
Federal funds sold, interest-bearing deposits and other short-term investments  8   11   594 
Total interest and dividend income  46,147   52,530   54,056 
INTEREST EXPENSE:            
Deposits  9,850   12,694   15,133 
Long-term debt  6,538   6,984   6,291 
Short-term borrowings  377   344   880 
Total interest expense  16,765   20,022   22,304 
Net interest and dividend income  29,382   32,508   31,752 
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES  8,923   3,900   3,453 
Net interest and dividend income after provision for loan losses  20,459   28,608   28,299 
             
NONINTEREST INCOME (LOSS):            
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses on equity securities  -   -   (1,283)
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses on debt securities  (590)  (1,754)  - 
Portion of other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in accumulated
other comprehensive loss on debt securities
  443   1,476   - 
Net other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in income  (147)  (278)  (1,283)
Service charges and fees  1,940   2,616   2,368 
Income from bank-owned life insurance  1,524   1,523   1,416 
Loss on sales of premises and equipment, net  -   (8)  - 
Loss on prepayment of borrowings  -   (142)  - 
Gain (loss) on sales of securities, net  4,072   (383)  1,078 
Gain (loss) on disposal of OREO  1   (110)  - 
Total noninterest income  7,390   3,218   3,579 
NONINTEREST EXPENSE:            
Salaries and employees benefits  14,712   15,018   14,719 
Occupancy  2,620   2,583   2,448 
Computer operations  1,940   1,760   1,717 
Professional fees  1,671   1,705   1,625 
OREO expense  374   47   - 
FDIC insurance assessment  751   1,134   89 
Other  2,741   2,853   2,794 
Total noninterest expense  24,809   25,100   23,392 
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES  3,040   6,726   8,486 
INCOME TAX PROVISION  34   1,267   1,795 
NET INCOME $3,006  $5,459  $6,691 
             
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:            
Basic earnings per share $0.11  $0.19  $0.22 
Weighted average shares outstanding  27,595,014   29,308,996   29,838,347 
Diluted earnings per share $0.11  $0.18  $0.22 
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding  27,793,409   29,577,622   30,190,532 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 
F-4

WESTFIELD FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
  Common Stock        Unearned     Accumulated    
  Shares  
Par
Value
  
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  
Unearned Compensation-
ESOP
  
Compensation-
Equity Incentive
Plan
  
Retained
Earnings
  
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
  Total 
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2007  31,933,549  $319  $209,497  $(11,542) $(5,493) $92,702  $1,049  $286,532 
Comprehensive loss:                                
Net income  -   -   -   -   -   6,691   -   6.691 
Net unrealized losses on securities available for sale arising during the period net of reclassification adjustment and tax effects  -   -   -   -   -   -   (7,376)  (7,376)
Change in pension gains or losses and transition assets, net of
      tax
  -   -   -   -   -   -   (2,581)  (2,581)
             Total comprehensive loss                      -   -   (3,266)
Common stock held by ESOP committed to be released (93,947
            shares)
  -   -   291   629   -   -   -   920 
Share-based compensation – stock options  -   -   770   -   -   -   -   770 
Share-based compensation – equity incentive plan  -   -   -   -   1,156   -   -   1,156 
Excess tax shortfalls from equity incentive plan  -   -   (11)  -   -   -   -   (11)
Common stock repurchased  (1,058,778)  (10)  (10,473)  -   -   -   -   (10,483)
Issuance of common stock in connection with stock option exercises  433,110   4   4,447   -   -   (2,550)  -   1,901 
Excess tax benefits in connection with stock option exercises  -   -   345   -   -   -   -   345 
Cash dividends declared (0.$60 per share)  -   -   -   -   -   (17,945)  -   (17,945)
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2008  31,307,881   313   204,866   (10,913)  (4,337)  78,898   (8 ,908)  259,919 
Comprehensive income:                                
Net income  -   -   -   -   -   5,459   -   5,459 
Noncredit portion of other-than-temporary impairment losses on                                
   available for sale securities net of reclassification and tax effects  -   -   -   -   -   -   (872)  (872)
Net unrealized gains on securities available for sale arising
   during the period, net of reclassification adjustment and tax
    effects
                          6,791   6,791 
Change in pension gains or losses and transition assets, net of
   tax
  -   -   -   -   -       675   675 
             Total comprehensive income                              12,053 
Common stock held by ESOP committed to be released (91,493
         shares)
  -   -   210   614   -   -   -   824 
Share-based compensation - stock options  -   -   899   -   -   -   -   899 
Share-based compensation - equity incentive plan  -   -   -   -   1,285   -   -   1,285 
Excess tax benefit from equity incentive plan  -   -   5   -   -   -   -   5 
Common stock repurchased  (1,591,733)  (16)  (13,674)  -   -   -   -   (13,690)
Issuance of common stock in connection with stock option exercises  102,378   1   957   -   -   (509)  -   449 
Issuance of common stock in connection with equity incentive plan  -   -   205   -   (205)  -   -   - 
Forfeiture of common stock in connection with equity incentive plan  -   -   (9)  -   9   -   -   - 
Excess tax benefits in connection with stock option exercises  -   -   150   -   -   -   -   150 
Cash dividends declared ($0.50 per share)  -   -   -   -   -   (14,595)  -   (14,595)
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2009  29,818,526   298   193,609   (10,299)  (3,248)  69,253   (2,314)  247,299 
Comprehensive loss:                                
     Net income  -   -   -   -   -   3,006   -   3,006 
     Net unrealized losses on securities available for sale arising                                
         during the period, net of reclassification adjustment and tax
           effects
  -   -   -   -   -   -   (11,163)  (11,163)
     Net unrealized gains on securities resulting from transfer from                                
          held-maturity to available-for-sale, net tax effects  -   -   -   -   -   -   8,351   8,351 
     Change in pension gains or losses and transition assets, net of tax  -   -   -   -   -   -   (390)  (390)
             Total comprehensive loss:                              (196)
Common stock held by ESOP committed to be released (89,039
           shares)
  -   -   149   598   -   -   -   747 
Share-based compensation - stock options  -   -   798   -   -   -   -   798 
Share-based compensation - equity incentive plan  -   -   -   -   1,159   -   -   1,159 
Excess tax shortfalls from equity incentive plan  -   -   (18)  -   -   -   -   (18)
Common stock repurchased  (1,988,634)  (19)  (16,108)  -   -   -   -   (16,127)
Issuance of common stock in connection with stock option exercises  336,527   3   2,942   -   -   (1,468)  -   1,477 
Issuance of common stock in connection with equity incentive plan  -   -   69   -   (69)  -   -   - 
Excess tax benefits in connection with stock option exercises  -   -   401   -   -   -   -   401 
Cash dividends declared ($0.52 per share)  -   -   -   -   -   (14,295)  -   (14,295)
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2010  28,166,419  $282  $181,842  $(9,701) $(2,158) $56,496  $(5,516) $221,245 
                                 
See the accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 
F-5

WESTFIELD FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASHFLOWS 
(Dollars in thousands) 
  Years Ended December 31, 
  2010  2009  2008 
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:         
Net income $3,006  $5,459  $6,691 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:            
Provision for loan losses  8,923   3,900   3,453 
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment  1,261   1,252   1,182 
Net amortization of premiums and discounts on securities and mortgage loans  6,053   1,909   178 
Share-based compensation expense  1,957   2,184   1,926 
Amortization of ESOP expense  747   824   920 
Excess tax shortfalls (benefits) from equity incentive plan  18   (5)  11 
Excess tax benefits in connection with stock option exercises  (401)  (150)  (345)
Net (gains) losses on sales of securities  (4,072)  383   (1,078)
Other-than-temporary impairment losses on securities  147   278   1,283 
Write-downs of other real estate owned  285   17   - 
(Gain) loss on sale of other real estate owned, net  (1)  110   - 
Loss on disposition of premises and equipment, net  -   8   - 
Loss on prepayment of borrowings  -   142   - 
Deferred income tax benefit  (389)  (112)  (1,098)
Income from bank-owned life insurance  (1,524)  (1,523)  (1,416)
Changes in assets and liabilities:            
Accrued interest receivable  928   37   526 
Other assets  358   (2,863)  107 
Other liabilities  1,059   (1,411)  (1,245)
Net cash provided by operating activities  18,355   10,439   11,095 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:            
Securities held to maturity:            
Purchases  (62,111)  (128,489)  (33,379)
Proceeds from calls, maturities, and principal collections  69,075   80,215   61,927 
Securities available for sale:            
Purchases  (654,889)  (297,683)  (164,275)
Proceeds from sales  496,990   149,809   109,195 
Proceeds from calls, maturities, and principal collections  122,598   66,911   56,880 
Purchase of residential mortgages  (61,880)  (16,381)  (1,648)
Loan originations and principal payments, net  19,122   13,473   (59,074)
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock  (1,912)  (1,883)  (946)
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned  1,693   148   - 
Purchases of premises and equipment  (662)  (1,396)  (536)
Purchase of bank-owned life insurance  -   (320)  (2,345)
Net cash used in investing activities  (71,976)  (135,596)  (34,201)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:            
Net increase (decrease) in deposits  52,360   59,946   (14,647)
Net change in short-term borrowings  (11,562)  24,675   14,556 
Repayment of long-term debt  (20,852)  (80,142)  (20,000)
Proceeds from long-term debt  45,129   120,545   88,300 
Cash dividends paid  (14,295)  (14,595)  (17,945)
Common stock repurchased  (16,127)  (13,690)  (10,483)
Issuance of common stock in connection with stock option exercises  1,477   449   1,901 
Excess tax (shortfalls) benefits in connection with equity incentive plan  (18)  5   (11)
Excess tax benefits in connection with stock option exercises  401   150   345 
Net cash provided by financing activities  36,513   97,343   42,016 
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:  (17,108)  (27,814)  18,910 
Beginning of year  28,719   56,533   37,623 
End of year $11,611  $28,719  $56,533 
Supplemental cash flow information:            
Transfer of loans to other real estate owned $538  $1,937  $- 
Increase (decrease) due from broker  7,791   (27,603)  27,603 
Securities reclassified from held-to-maturity to available-for-sale  287,074   -   - 
See the accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements 
F-6

WESTFIELD FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)


 

Years Ended December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME:

 

 

 

 

 

Debt securities, taxable

$  24,362 

 

$  21,983 

 

$  14,396 

Residential and commercial real estate loans

18,783 

 

18,193 

 

17,551 

Commercial and industrial loans

8,032 

 

8,301 

 

7,475 

Debt securities, tax-exempt

1,389 

 

1,303 

 

1,230 

Equity securities

574 

 

643 

 

501 

Consumer loans

322 

 

361 

 

410 

Federal funds sold

591 

 

2,700 

 

770 

Interest-bearing deposits and other short-term
  investments

 

100 

 

102 

Total interest and dividend income

54,056 

 

53,584 

 

42,435 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INTEREST EXPENSE:

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits

15,133 

 

19,544 

 

17,268 

Short-term borrowings

880 

 

728 

 

627 

Long-term debt

6,291 

 

3,136 

 

1,656 

Total interest expense

22,304 

 

23,408 

 

19,551 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest and dividend income

31,752 

 

30,176 

 

22,884 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES

3,453 

 

400 

 

390 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest and dividend income after
provision for loan losses

28,299 

 

29,776 

 

22,494 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NONINTEREST INCOME:

 

 

 

 

 

Income from bank-owned life insurance

1,357 

 

1,259 

 

800 

Service charges and fees

2,368 

 

2,400 

 

2,651 

Gain (loss) on sales of premises and equipment, net

 

546 

 

(378)

Gain on sales of securities, net

1,078 

 

41 

 

Other than temporary impairment of securities

(1,283)

 

 

Curtailment of defined benefit life insurance plan

 

315 

 

Total noninterest income

3,520 

 

4,561 

 

3,073 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NONINTEREST EXPENSE:

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries and employees benefits

14,660 

 

13,739 

 

11,985 

Occupancy

2,448 

 

2,368 

 

2,060 

Professional fees

1,625 

 

1,400 

 

1,081 

Data processing

1,717 

 

1,447 

 

1,446 

Stationery, supplies and postage

484 

 

498 

 

510 

Other

2,399 

 

2,373 

 

2,308 

Total noninterest expense

23,333 

 

21,825 

 

19,390 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES

8,486 

 

12,512 

 

6,177 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INCOME TAXES

1,795 

 

3,812 

 

1,523 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET INCOME

$    6,691 

 

$    8,700 

 

$    4,654 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per share

$      0.23 

 

$      0.29 

 

$      0.15 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding

29,302,296 

 

29,896,686 

 

30,656,584 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per share

$      0.23 

 

$      0.29 

 

$      0.15 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average diluted shares outstanding

29,710,063 

 

30,397,691 

 

31,199,823 


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.



F-3




WESTFIELD FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unearned
Compensation -
Equity
Incentive Plan

 

Retained
Earnings

 

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income

 

Total

 

Common Stock

 

Additional
Paid-in
Capital

 

Unearned
Compensation -
ESOP

 

 

Shares

 

Par
Value

BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2005

9,754,757 

 

$    98 

 

$    30,120 

 

$    (5,127)

 

$     (861)

 

$  92,789 

 

$  (1,177)

 

$  115,842 

Comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     Net income

 

 

 

 

 

4,654 

 

 

4,654 

     Net unrealized gains on securities available for sale arising during the
      year, net of tax effects

 

 

 

 

 

 

374 

 

374 

Comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,028 

Net proceeds from sale of common stock

 

 

177 

 

171,535 

 

 

 

 

 

171,712 

Common stock held by ESOP committed to be released (60,729 shares)

 

 

229 

 

292 

 

 

 

 

521 

Adjustment to initially apply FASB Statement No. 158, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

77 

 

77 

Share-based compensation - stock options

 

 

317 

 

 

 

 

 

317 

Share-based compensation - equity incentive plan

 

 

 

 

456 

 

 

 

456 

Excess tax benefits from equity incentive plan

 

 

260 

 

 

 

 

 

260 

Common stock repurchased

(65,000)

 

(1)

 

(1,582)

 

 

 

 

 

(1,583)

Issuance of common stock in connection with stock option exercises

39,155 

 

 

857 

 

 

 

(294)

 

 

563 

Cash dividends declared ($0.32 per share)

 

 

 

 

 

(3,785)

 

 

(3,785)

BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2006

9,728,912 

 

274 

 

201,736 

 

(4,835)

 

(405)

 

93,364 

 

(726)

 

289,408 

Comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     Net income

 

 

 

 

 

8,700 

 

 

8,700 

     Net unrealized gains on securities available for sale arising during the
      period, net reclassification adjustment and tax effects

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,298 

 

1,298 

     Change in pension gains or losses and transition assets, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

477 

 

477 

Comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,475 

Exchange of common stock pursuant to reorganization (9,728,912 shares
     exchanged at a 3.28138 ratio for 31,923,903 shares)

21,458,993 

 

38 

 

(358)

 

 

 

 

 

(320)

Capital contribution pursuant to dissolution of Mutual Holding Company

 

 

 

 

 

2,713 

 

 

2,713 

Common stock held by ESOP committed to be released (96,182 shares)

 

 

320 

 

653 

 

 

 

 

973 

Share-based compensation - stock options

 

 

418 

 

 

 

 

 

418 

Share-based compensation - equity incentive plan

 

 

 

 

751 

 

 

 

751 

Establishment of equity incentive plan - restricted stock

 

 

5,839 

 

 

(5,839)

 

 

 

Excess tax benefits from equity incentive plan

 

 

222 

 

 

 

 

 

222 

Purchase of ESOP Shares

736,000 

 

 

7,353 

 

(7,360)

 

 

 

 

Purchase of common stock in connection equity incentive plan

 

 

(6,075)

 

 

 

 

 

(6,075)

Issuance of common stock in connection with stock option exercises

9,644 

 

 

42 

 

 

 

 

 

42 

Cash dividends declared ($0.40 per share)

 

 

 

 

 

(12,075)

 

 

(12,075)

BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2007

31,933,549 

 

319 

 

209,497 

 

(11,542)

 

(5,493)

 

92,702 

 

1,049 

 

286,532 

Comprehensive loss:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     Net income

 

 

 

 

 

6,691 

 

 

6,691 

     Net unrealized gains on securities available for sale arising during the
      period, net reclassification adjustment and tax effects

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7,376)

 

(7,376)

     Change in pension gains or losses and transition assets, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,581)

 

(2,581)

Comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,266)

Common stock held by ESOP committed to be released (93,947 shares)

 

 

291 

 

629 

 

 

 

 

920 

Share-based compensation - stock options

 

 

770 

 

 

 

 

 

770 

Share-based compensation - equity incentive plan

 

 

 

 

1,156 

 

 

 

1,156 

Excess tax shortfalls from equity incentive plan

 

 

(11)

 

 

 

 

 

(11)

Common stock repurchased

(1,058,778)

 

(10)

 

(10,473)

 

 

 

 

 

(10,483)

Issuance of common stock in connection with stock option exercises

433,110 

 

 

4,447 

 

 

 

(2,550)

 

 

1,901 

Excess tax benefits in connection with stock option exercises

 

 

345 

 

 

 

 

 

345 

Cash dividends declared ($0.60 per share)

 

 

 

 

 

(17,945)

 

 

(17,945)

BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2008

31,307,881 

 

$  313 

 

$  204,866 

 

$  (10,913)

 

$  (4,337)

 

$  78,898 

 

$  (8,908)

 

$  259,919 

 

See the accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.



F-4




WESTFIELD FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASHFLOWS

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 Years Ended December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

    Net Income

$              6,691 

 

$               8,700 

 

$               4,654 

    Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided

 

 

 

 

 

              by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

          Provision for loan losses

3,453 

 

400 

 

390 

          Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment

1,182 

 

1,096 

 

1,030 

          Net amortization of premiums and discounts on securities, mortgage-

 

 

 

 

 

              backed securities and mortgage loans

178 

 

321 

 

657 

          Share-based compensation expense

1,926 

 

1,169 

 

773 

          Amortization of ESOP expense

920 

 

973 

 

521 

          Excess tax shortfalls (benefits) from equity incentive plan

11 

 

(222)

 

(260)

          Excess tax benefits in connection with stock option exercises

(345)

 

 

          Net gains on sales of securities

(1,078)

 

(41)

 

          Other than temporary impairment of securities

1,283 

 

 

          (Gain) loss on sale of premises and equipment, net

 

(546)

 

378 

          Deferred income tax benefit

(1,098)

 

(184)

 

(256)

          Income from bank-owned life insurance

(1,357)

 

(1,259)

 

(800)

    Changes in assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

          Accrued interest receivable

526 

 

(1,259)

 

(649)

          Other assets

48 

 

376 

 

(436)

          Other liabilities

(1,245)

 

1,236 

 

530 

              Net cash provided by operating activities

11,095 

 

10,760 

 

6,532 

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

    Securities, held to maturity:

 

 

 

 

 

          Purchases

(2,290)

 

(41,738)

 

(17,097)

          Proceeds from calls, maturities, and principal collections

27,010 

 

15,000 

 

13,000 

    Securities, available for sale:

 

 

 

 

 

          Purchases

(22,346)

 

(26,281)

��

(21,295)

          Proceeds from sales

20,304 

 

15,147 

 

5,000 

          Proceeds from calls, maturities, and principal collections

14,992 

 

15,023 

 

3,000 

    Mortgage-backed securities, held to maturity:

 

 

 

 

 

          Purchases

(31,089)

 

(49,078)

 

(48,727)

          Principal collections

34,917 

 

39,560 

 

37,368 

    Mortgage-backed securities, available for sale:

 

 

 

 

 

          Purchases

(141,929)

 

(111,304)

 

(51,720)

          Proceeds from sales

88,891 

 

272 

 

          Principal collections

41,888 

 

33,634 

 

26,307 

     Purchase of residential mortgages

(1,648)

 

(1,759)

 

(11,845)

     Net other (increase) decrease in loans

(59,074)

 

(28,388)

 

5,080 

     Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock

(946)

 

(3,481)

 

(9)

     Proceeds from redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock

 

217 

 

     Purchases of premises and equipment

(536)

 

(1,935)

 

(2,618)

     Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment

 

920 

 

10 

     Purchase of bank-owned life insurance

(2,345)

 

(10,520)

 

              Net cash used in investing activities

(34,201)

 

(154,711)

 

(63,546)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

     Net (decrease) increase in deposits

(14,647)

 

(24,790)

 

4,421 

     Net change in short-term borrowings

14,556 

 

7,349 

 

13,478 

     Repayment of long-term debt

(20,000)

 

(20,000)

 

(10,000)

     Proceeds from long-term debt

88,300 

 

80,000 

 

10,000 

     Cash dividends paid

(17,945)

 

(12,075)

 

(3,785)

     Net proceeds from sale of common stock

 

 

171,712 

     Exchange of common stock pursuant to reorganization

 

(320)

 

     Capital contribution pursuant to dissolution of MHC

 

2,713 

 

     Common stock repurchased

(10,483)

 

 

(1,583)

     Issuance of common stock in connection with stock option exercises

1,901 

 

42 

 

563 

     Excess tax (shortfalls) benefits in connection with equity incentive plan

(11)

 

222 

 

260 

     Excess tax benefits in connection with stock option exercises

345 

 

 

     Purchase of common stock in connection with equity incentive plan

 

(6,075)

 

              Net cash provided by financing activities

42,016 

 

27,066 

 

185,066 

NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:

18,910 

 

(116,885)

 

128,052 

     Beginning of period

37,623 

 

154,508 

 

26,456 

     End of period

$            56,533 

 

$             37,623 

 

$           154,508 

Supplemental cash flow information:

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash due to broker for purchase of mortgage-backed securities,

 

 

 

 

 

available for sale

$           (27,603)

 

$                      - 

 

$                      - 

 

See the accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements




F-5




WESTFIELD FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007,2010, 2009, AND 2006

2008



1.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES


Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation - Westfield Financial, Inc. (the “Company”(“Westfield Financial,” “we” or “Westfield Financial”“us”) was organized as a Massachusetts-chartered stockis the bank holding company in November 2001 in connection with the reorganization offor Westfield Mutual Holding Company, a federally-chartered mutual holding company. As part of the reorganization, Westfield Financial offered for sale 47% of its common stock. The remaining 53% of Westfield Financial's shares were issued to Westfield Mutual Holding Company. The reorganization and related stock offering were completed on December 27, 2001.


On January 3, 2007, Westfield Financial completed its stock offering in connection with the second step conversion of Westfield Mutual Holding Company. As part of the conversion, New Westfield Financial, Inc. succeeded Westfield Financial as the stock holding company of Westfield Bank, and Westfield Mutual Holding Company was dissolved. In the stock offering, a total of 18,400,000 shares representing Westfield Mutual Holding Company's ownership interest in Westfield Financial were sold by New Westfield Financial in a subscription offering, community offering and syndicated offering. In addition, each outstanding share of Westfield Financial as of January 3, 2007 was exchanged for 3.28138 new shares of New Westfield Financial common stock. New Westfield Financial, Inc. changed its name to Westfield Financial, Inc. effective January 3, 2007.  


The conversion was accounted for as a reorganization in corporate form with no change in the historical basis of Westfield Financial's assets, liabilities, and equity. All references to the number of shares outstanding, including references for purposes of calculating per share amounts, are restated to give retroactive recognition to the exchange ratio applied in the conversion.


Westfield Bank is a federally-chartered stock savings bank subsidiary of (the “Bank”).


Westfield Financial. Westfield Bank'sBank’s deposits are insured to the limits specified by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC"(“FDIC”).  WestfieldThe Bank operates eleven branches in Western Massachusetts. Westfield Bank'swestern Massachusetts and its primary sourcesources of revenue isare income from securities and earnings on loans to small and middle-market businesses and to residential property homeowners.


Elm Street Securities Corporation and WFD Securities Corporation, Massachusetts-chartered security corporations, were formed by Westfield Financial for the primary purpose of holding qualified investment securities.  

In October 2009, WB Real Estate Holdings, LLC, a Massachusetts-chartered limited liability company was formed for the primary purpose of holding real property acquired as security for debts previously contracted by the Bank.


Principles of Consolidation - The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Westfield Financial, Westfield Bank, Elm Street Securities Corporation, WB Real Estate Holdings and WFD Securities Corporation.  All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.




F-6




Estimates- The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses for each.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.  Estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near-term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, and other than temporaryother-than-temporary impairment of investment securities and the valuation of deferred tax assets.


Reclassifications – Certain amounts in the prior year financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

Cash and Cash Equivalents - Westfield Financial definesWe define cash on hand, cash due from banks, federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits having an original maturity of 90 days or less as cash and cash equivalents.  Cash and due from bankscash equivalents at December 31, 20082010 and 2007 includes2009 include partially restricted cash of $386,000,$2,496,000, and $351,000$2,460,000, respectively, for Federal Reserve Bank of Boston cash reserve requirements.


Securities and Mortgage-Backed Securities- Debt securities, including mortgage-backed securities, which management has the positive intent and ability to hold until maturity are classified as held to maturity and are carried at amortized cost.  Securities, including mortgage-backed securities, which have been identified as assets for which there is not a positive intent to hold to maturity are classified as available for sale and are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, net of income taxes, reported as a separate component of comprehensive income.  Westfield Financial doesincome/loss.  We do not acquire securities and mortgage-backed securities for purposes of engaging in trading activities.


Realized gains and losses on sales of securities and mortgage-backed securities are computed using the specific identification method and are included in noninterest income.income on the trade date.  The amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts is determined by using the level yield method to the maturity date.


Other than Temporary

F-7

Other-than-Temporary Impairment of Securities - On a quarterly basis, Westfield Financial reviews investmentwe review securities with unrealized depreciation on a judgmental basisdecline in fair value below the amortized cost of the investment to assessdetermine whether the decline in fair value is temporary or other than temporary.other-than-temporary.  Declines in the fair value of held to maturity and available for salemarketable equity securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than temporary based on the severity and duration of the impairment are reflected in earnings as realized losses.  In estimating other-than-temporary impairment losses for securities, impairment is required to be recognized if (1) we intend to sell the security; (2) it is “more likely than not” that we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis; or (3) for debt securities, if the present value of expected cash flows is not sufficient to recover the entire amortized cost basis.  For all impaired debt securities that we intend to sell, or more likely than not will be required to sell, the full amount of the other-than-temporary impairment is recognized through earnings.  For all other impaired debt securities, credit-related other than temporary impairment losses, management considers (1)is recognized through earnings, while non-credit related other than temporary impairment is recognized in other comprehensive income/loss, net of applicable taxes.

Fair Value Hierarchy - We group our assets generally measured at fair value in three levels, based on the length of timemarkets in which the assets are traded and the extentreliability of the assumptions used to whichdetermine fair value.

Level 1 – Valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 assets generally include debt and equity securities that are traded in an active exchange market. Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets.

Level 2 – Valuation is based on observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets.

Level 3 – Valuation is based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3)assets. Level 3 assets include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the intent and abilitydetermination of Westfield Financial to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.


value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock- WestfieldThe Bank, as a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) system, is required to maintain an investment in capital stock of the FHLB.  Based on the redemption provisions of the FHLB, the stock has no quoted market value and is carried at cost.  Presently, there is a moratorium on redemption of the stock. At its discretion, the FHLB may declare dividends on the stock.  Westfield BankOn February 22, 2011, the FHLB notified its members that it would be paying a fourth quarter dividend and that it anticipates paying dividends through 2011.  The FHLB had previously suspended paying dividends on January 28, 2009.  Management reviews for impairment based on the ultimate recoverability of the cost basis in the FHLB stock.  As of December 31, 2008,2010, no impairment has been recognized.



F-7




  The recorded investment in FHLB stock is $12.0 million and $10.1 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Loans - Loans are recorded at the principal amount outstanding, adjusted for charge-offs, unearned premiums and deferred loan fees and costs.  Interest on loans is calculated using the effective yield method on daily balances of the principal amount outstanding and is credited to income on the accrual basis to the extent it is deemed collectible.  Westfield Financial’sOur general policy is to discontinue the accrual of interest when principal or interest payments are delinquent 90 days or more based on the contractual terms of the loan, or earlier if the loan is considered impaired.  Any unpaid amounts previously accrued on these loans are reversed from income.  Subsequent cash receipts are applied to the outstanding principal balance or to interest income if, in the judgment of management, collection of the principal balance is not in question.  Loans are returned to accrual status when they become current a sas to both principal and interest and when subsequent performance reduces the concern as to the collectability of principal and interest.  Loan fees and certain direct loan origination costs are deferred, and the net fee or cost is recognized as an adjustment to interest income over the estimated average lives of the related loans.


F-8

Allowance for Loan Losses - The allowance for loan losses is established through provisions for loan losses charged to expense.  Loans are charged offcharged-off against the allowance when management believes that the collectability of the principal is unlikely.  Recoveries of amounts previously charged-offSubsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.


Westfield Bank maintains an

The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management.  This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to absorb losses inherent in the loan portfolio based on ongoing quarterly assessments of the estimated losses. Westfield Bank’s methodology for assessing the appropriateness of thesignificant revision as more information becomes available.  The allowance consists of two keygeneral and allocated components, which are a specific allowance for impaired loans and a formula allowance for the remainderas further described below.

General component

The general component of the portfolio. The appropriateness of the formula allowance is reviewed by management based upon its evaluation of then-existing economic and business conditions affecting the key lending areas of the Westfield Financial and other conditions, such as new loan products, credit quality trends (including trends in nonperforming loans expected to result from existing conditions), collateral values, loan volumes and concentrations, specific industry conditions within portfolio segments that existed as of the balance sheet date and the impact that such conditions were believed to have had on the collectability of the loan portfolio. Although management believes it has established and maintained the allowance for loan losses atis based on historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors stratified by the following loan segments: residential real estate, commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, and consumer.  Management uses a rolling average of historical losses based on a time frame appropriate levels, future adjustments may be necessary ifto capture relevant loss data for each loan segment.  This historical loss factor is adjusted for the following qualitative factors: trends in delinquencies and nonperforming loans; trends in volume and terms of loans; effects of changes in risk selection and underwriting standards and other changes in lending policies, procedures and practices; and national and local economic trends and industry conditions.  There were no changes in our policies or methodology pertaining to the general component of the allowance for loan losses during 2010.

The qualitative factors are determined based on the various risk characteristics of each loan segment.  Risk characteristics relevant to each portfolio segment are as follows:

Residential real estate – We require private mortgage insurance for all loans originated with a loan-to-value ratio greater than 80 percent and do not grant subprime loans.  All loans in this segment are collateralized by owner-occupied residential real estate and other conditions differ substantiallyrepayment is dependent on the credit quality of the individual borrower.  The overall health of the economy, including unemployment rates and housing prices, will have an effect on the credit quality in this segment.

Commercial real estate – Loans in this segment are primarily income-producing investment properties throughout New England.  The underlying cash flows generated by the properties are adversely impacted by a downturn in the economy as evidenced by increased vacancy rates, which in turn, will have an effect on the credit quality in this segment.  Management obtains rent rolls and tax returns annually and continually monitors the cash flows of these loans.

Commercial and industrial loans – Loans in this segment are made to businesses and are generally secured by assets of the business.  Repayment is expected from the current operating environment.

cash flows of the business.  A weakened economy, and resultant decreased consumer spending, will have an effect on the credit quality in this segment.


Consumer loans – Loans in this segment are generally unsecured and repayment is dependent on the credit quality of the individual borrower.

Allocated component

The specific allowance incorporatesallocated component relates to loans that are classified as impaired. Impaired loans are identified by analysis of loan performance, internal credit ratings and watch list loans that management believes are subject to a higher risk of loss.  Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis for commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans by either the results of measuring impaired loans as provided in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan,” and SFAS No. 118, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan –Income Recognition and Disclosures.” These accounting standards prescribe the measurement methods, income recognition and disclosures related to impaired loans.  A loan is recognized as impaired when it is probable that principal and/or interest are not collectible in accordance with the loan’s contractual terms.  A loan is not deemed to be impaired if there is a short delay in receipt of payment or if, during a longer period of delay, Westfield Financial expects to collect all amounts due including interest accrued at the contractual rate during the period of delay.  Measurement of impairment can be based on present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.  This evaluationAn allowance is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant change.  Ifestablished when the fair valuediscounted cash flows (or collateral value) of the impaired loan is lesslower than the related recorded amount, a specific valuation allowance is established within the allowance for loan losses or a writedown is charged against the allowance for loan losses if the impairment is considered to be permanent.  Measurementcarrying value of impairment does not apply to largethat loan. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment such as Westfield Financials’s portfolios ofimpairment.  Accordingly, we do not separately identify individual consumer and residential real estate loans.





F-8




In addition,loans for impairment disclosures, unless such loans are subject to a troubled debt restructuring agreement.

F-9

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect the Officescheduled payments of Thrift Supervision,principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.  Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due.  Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as an integral partimpaired.  We determine the significance of its examination process, periodically reviewspayment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and foreclosed real estate portfoliosthe borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the related allowance for loan losses and valuation allowance for foreclosed real estate. The Officeamount of Thrift Supervision may require adjustmentthe shortfall in relation to the allowance forprincipal and interest owed.

We may periodically agree to modify the contractual terms of loans.  When a loan losses based on their judgments of information availableis modified and a concession is made to them ata borrower experiencing financial difficulty, the time of their examination, thereby adversely affecting results of operations.

modification is considered a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”).  All TDRs are initially classified as impaired.


Management believes that the allowance for loan losses accurately reflects estimated credit losses for specifically identified loans, as well as probable credit losses inherent in the remainder of the portfolio as of the end of the years presented.


We also maintain a reserve for unfunded credit commitments to provide for the risk of loss inherent in these arrangements.  This reserve is determined using a methodology similar to the analysis of the allowance for loan losses, taking into consideration probabilities of future funding requirements.  This reserve for unfunded commitments is included in other liabilities and was $60,000 at December 31, 2010 and 2009.

Bank-Owned Life Insurance –Bank-owned life insurance policies are reflected on the consolidated balance sheetsheets at cash surrender value. Changes in the net cash surrender value of the policies, as well as insurance proceeds received, are reflected in non-interest income on the consolidated statements of income and are not subject to income taxes.


Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets – Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales, when control over the assets has been surrendered.  Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (1) the assets have been isolated from Westfield Financial,us, (2) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and (3) Westfield Financial doeswe do not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity.


Effective January 1, 2010, we adopted accounting guidance pertaining to transfers of financial assets.  During the normal course of business, we may transfer a portion of a financial asset, for example, a participation loan or the government-guaranteed portion of a loan.  In order to be eligible for sales treatment, the transfer of the portion of the loan must meet the criteria of a participating interest.  If it does not meet the criteria of a participating interest, the transfer must be accounted for as a secured borrowing.  In order to meet the criteria for a participating interest, all cash flows from the loan must be divided proportionately, the rights of each loan holder must have the same priority, the loan holders must have no recourse to the transferor other than standard representations and warranties and no loan holder has the right to pledge or exchange the entire loan.

Premises and Equipment – Land is carried at cost.  Buildings and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization, computed on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, or the expected lease term, if shorter.  Expected terms include lease option periods to the extent that the exercise of such options is reasonably assured.  The estimated useful lives of the assets are as follows:


Years

Years

Buildings

39

Buildings

Leasehold Improvements

39

5-20

Leasehold Improvements

5-20

Furniture and Equipment

3-7


The cost of maintenance and repairs is charged to expense when incurred.  Major expenditures for betterments are capitalized and depreciated.


F-10

Other Real Estate Owned - Other real estate owned (“OREO”) represents property acquired through foreclosure or deeded to Westfield Financialus in lieu of foreclosure.  Other real estate ownedOREO is initially recorded at the lower of the carrying value of the related loan, or the estimated fair value of the real estate acquired, net of estimated selling costs.costs, establishing a new cost basis.  Initial write-downs are charged to the allowance for loan losses at the time the loan is transferred to other real estate owned.OREO.  Subsequent valuations are periodically performed by management and the carrying value is adjusted by a charge to expense to reflect any subsequent declines in the estimated fair value.  Operating costs associated with other real estate ownedOREO are expensed as incurred.  There was no other real estate owned at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.



F-9




Retirement Plans and Employee Benefits-Westfield Financial provides We provide a defined benefit pension plan for eligible employees through membership in the Savings Banks Employees Retirement Association (“SBERA”).  Westfield Financial’sOur policy is to fund pension costs as accrued.  Employees are also eligible to participate in a 401(k) plan through the Principal Financial Group.  Westfield Financial makesWe make matching contributions to this plan at 50% of up to 6% of the employees’ eligible compensation.

  The compensation cost of an employee’s pension benefit is recognized on the projected unit credit method over the employee’s approximate service period.  The aggregate cost method is utilized for funding purposes.


Westfield Financial

We currently offersoffer postretirement life insurance benefits to retired employees.  Such postretirement benefits represent a form of deferred compensation which requires that the cost and obligations of such benefits are recognized in the period in which services are rendered.


In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Post Retirement Plans” (“SFAS 158”), which requires employers to (a) recognize in its statement of financial position the funded status of a benefit plan, (b) measure a plan’s assets and its obligations that determine its funded status as of the end of the employer’s fiscal year, (c) recognize, through other comprehensive income, net of tax, changes in the funded status of the benefit plan that are not recognized as net periodic benefit costs, and (d) disclose additional information about certain effects on net periodic benefit cost for the next fiscal year that relate to the delayed recognition of certain benefit cost elements.  The requirement to measure plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of the employer’s fiscal year-end is effective for the year ended December 31, 2008.


Share-Based Compensation PlansWestfield Financial measuresWe measure and recognizesrecognize compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions based on the grant-date fair value of the equity instruments issued.  Share-based compensation is recognized over the period the employee is required to provide services for the award.  Westfield Financial usesReductions in compensation expense associated with forfeited options are estimated at the date of grant, and this estimated forfeiture rate is adjusted based on actual forfeiture experience.  We use a binomial option-pricing model to determine the fair value of the stock options granted.


Employee Stock Ownership Plan – Compensation expense for the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) is recorded at an amount equal to the shares allocated by the ESOP multiplied by the average fair market value of the shares during the period.  Westfield Financial recognizesWe recognize compensation expense ratably over the year based upon itsour estimate of the number of shares expected to be allocated by the ESOP.  Unearned compensation applicable to the ESOP is reflected as a reduction of stockholders’shareholders’ equity in the consolidated balance sheet.sheets.  The difference between the average fair market value and the cost of the shares allocated by the ESOP is recorded as an adjustment to additional paid-in capital.


Advertising Costs – Advertising costs are expensed as incurred.

Income Taxes - Westfield Financial usesWe use the asset and liability method for income tax accounting, whereby, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates applied to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.  A valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets is established when, in the judgment of management, it is more likely than not that all or a portion of such deferred tax assets will not be realized.



F-10




realized based on the available evidence including historical and projected taxable income.  We do not have any uncertain tax positions at December 31, 2010 which require accrual or disclosure.  We record interest and penalties as part of income tax expense.  No interest or penalties were recorded for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008.

F-11

Earnings per Share– Basic earnings per share represents income available to common stockholdersshareholders divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period.  If rights to dividends or unvested awards are non-forfeitable, these unvested awards are considered outstanding in the computation of basic earnings per share.  Diluted earnings per share reflects additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued, as well as any adjustment to income that would result from the assumed issuance.  Potential common shares that may be issued by Westfield Financialus relate solely to outstanding stock awards and options and are determined using the treasury stock method.  Unallocated ESOP shares are not deemed outstanding for earnings per share calculations.


Earnings per common share for the years ended December 31, have been computed based on the following:

   Years Ended December 31, 
   2010  2009  2008 
   (In thousands, except per share data) 
           
 Net income applicable to common stock $3,006  $5,459  $6,691 
              
 Average number of common shares issued  29,063   30,873   31,509 
 Less: Average unallocated ESOP Shares  (1,426)  (1,513)  (1,606)
           Average ungranted equity incentive plan shares  (42)  (51)  (65)
              
 Average number of common shares outstanding used            
 to calculate basic earnings per common share(1)  27,595   29,309   29,838 
              
 Effect of dilutive stock options  198   269   352 
              
 Average number of common shares outstanding used            
 to calculate diluted earnings per common share  27,793   29,578   30,190 
              
 Basic earnings per share $0.11  $0.19  $0.22 
              
 Diluted earnings per share $0.11  $0.18  $0.22 

(1) Weighted-average shares outstanding for 2008 have been adjusted retrospectively for restricted shares that were determined to be “participating” in accordance with an amendment to Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC 260, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities.”

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income applicable to common stock

$     6,691 

 

$     8,700 

 

$     4,654 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average number of common shares issued

31,509 

 

31,927 

 

31,884 

Less: Average unallocated ESOP Shares

(1,610)

 

(1,701)

 

(1,043)

Less: Average nonvested equity incentive plan shares

(597)

 

(329)

 

(184)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average number of common shares outstanding used
    to caculate basic earnings per common share

29,302 

 

29,897 

 

30,657 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effect of dilutive unvested restricted stock awards

56 

 

51 

 

127 

Effect of dilutive stock options

352 

 

450 

 

416 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average number of common shares outstanding used
    to caculate diluted earnings per common share

29,710 

 

30,398 

 

31,200 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per share

$       0.23 

 

$       0.29 

 

$       0.15 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per share

$       0.23 

 

$       0.29 

 

$       0.15 


Stock options and awards that would have an anti-dilutive effect on diluted earnings per share are excluded from the calculation.  AtFor the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, 1,576,024 shares, 1,543,100 shares and 2007, 1,501,857 shares were anti-dilutive.  No shares were anti-dilutive, at December 31, 2006.

respectively.


Reclassifications –Certain amounts in the prior year financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.



F-11




Comprehensive Income/Loss


Accounting principles generally require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in net income.  Although certain changes in assets and liabilities are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the balance sheet, such items, along with net income, are components of comprehensive income.


income/loss.

F-12

The components of other comprehensive (loss) income (loss) and related tax effects are as follows:

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2010  2009  2008 
  (In thousands) 
Unrealized holding (losses) gains on available for sale securities $(12,766) $8,548  $(11,899)
Reclassification adjustment for securities transferred from held-to-maturity to available-for-sale  12,653   -   - 
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses realized in income  (4,072)  383   (1,078)
Other-than-temporary impairment losses on available-for-sale securities  147   278   1,283 
Net unrealized (losses) gains on available for sale securities  (4,038)  9,209   (11,694)
Tax effect  1,226   (3,290)  4,318 
Net-of-tax amount  (2,812)  5,919   (7,376)
             
Gains and losses arising during the year pertaining to defined benefit plans  (670)  898   (3,852)
Reclassification adjustments for items reflected in earnings:            
Actuarial loss (gain)  91   137   (45)
Transition asset  (12)  (12)  (13)
Net adjustments pertaining to defined benefit plans  (591)  1,023   (3,910)
Tax effect  201   (348)  1,329 
Net-of-tax amount  (390)  675   (2,581)
             
Net other comprehensive (loss) income $(3,202) $6,594  $(9,957)

 

Years Ended  December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized holding (losses) gains on available for sale

$ (11,899)

 

$    2,096 

 

$      578 

    securities

 

 

 

 

 

Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains)

 

 

 

 

 

    realized in income

205 

 

(41)

 

Net unrealized (losses) gains on available for sale securities

(11,694)

 

2,055 

 

578 

Tax effect

4,318 

 

(757)

 

(204)

       Net-of-tax amount

(7,376)

 

1,298 

 

374 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gains and losses arising during the period pertaining

 

 

 

 

 

to defined benefit plans

(3,897)

 

734 

 

25 

Reclassification adjustment for transition asset recognized

 

 

 

 

 

in net periodic benefit cost pertaing to defined benefit plans

(13)

 

(11)

 

92 

Net adjustments pertaining to defined benefit plans

(3,910)

 

723 

 

117 

Tax effect

1,329 

 

(246)

 

(40)

       Net-of-tax amount

(2,581)

 

477 

 

77 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net other comprehensive (loss) income

$   (9,957)

 

$    1,775 

 

$      451 


The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss),loss, included in stockholders’shareholders’ equity are as follows:


 

December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

(In thousands)

Net unrealized (loss) gain on securities

 

 

 

   available for sale

$    (10,913)

 

$          781 

Tax effect

4,032 

 

(286)

         Net-of-tax amount

(6,881)

 

495 

 

 

 

 

Unrecognized transition asset pertaining

 

 

 

    to defined benefit plan

68 

 

81 

Unrecognized deferred (loss) gain pertaining

 

 

 

    to defined benefit plan

(3,138)

 

759 

 

(3,070)

 

840 

Tax effect

1,043 

 

(286)

         Net-of-tax amount

(2,027)

 

554 

 

 

 

 

Net accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income

$      (8,908)

 

$       1,049 


  December 31, 
  2010  2009 
  (In thousands) 
Net unrealized loss on securities available for sale $(5,299) $(228)
Tax effect  1,817   138 
Net-of-tax amount  (3,482)  (90)
         
Noncredit portion of other-than-temporary impairment losses on available for sale securities  (443)  (1,476)
Tax effect  151   604 
Net-of-tax amount  (292)  (872)
         
Unrecognized transition assets pertaining to defined benefit plans  44   56 
Unrecognized deferred loss pertaining to defined benefit plan  (2,682)  (2,103)
Net accumulated other comprehensive loss pertaining to defined benefit plans  (2,638)  (2,047)
Tax effect  896   695 
Net-of-tax amount  (1,742)  (1,352)
         
Net accumulated other comprehensive loss $(5,516) $(2,314)
F-13

An actuarial loss of $136,000$116,000 is included in accumulated other comprehensive incomeloss at December 31, 2008,2010, and is expected to be recognized as a component of net periodic pension cost for the year ending December 31, 2009.2011.  A transition asset of $11,000$12,000 is included in accumulated other comprehensive incomeloss at December 31, 2008,2010, and is expected to be recognized as a component of net periodic pension cost for the year ending December 31, 2009.

2011.



F-12




Recent Accounting Pronouncements


In September 2006,June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued StatementAccounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements" (“SFAS No. 157”).2009-16, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860) Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets.  This Statement defines fair value, establishesASU makes several significant amendments to ASC Topic 860, Transfers and Servicing, including the removal of the concept of a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  qualifying special-purpose entity. The definition of fair value retains the exchange price notion in earlier definitions of fair value. This Statementnew guidance also clarifies that a transferor must evaluate whether it has maintained effective control of a financial asset by considering its continuing direct or indirect involvement with the exchange price is the price in an orderly transaction between market participants to sell the asset or transfer the liability in the market in which the reporting entity would transacttransferred financial asset. The new authoritative accounting guidance became effective for the asset or liability, that is, the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability.  Emphasis is placed on fair value being a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurem ent, and therefore a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering these market participant assumptions, a fair value hierarchy has been established to distinguish between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs) and (2) the reporting entity's own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs).In February 2008, the FASB issued a Staff Position which delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis, to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008.  Westfield Financial2009. We adopted this statement, except for items covered by the Staff Position, as ofnew guidance under ASU No. 2009-16 on January 1, 2008 and the2010. The adoption did not have a material impact on theour consolidated financial statements (seestatements.  We have provided the disclosures required as of December 31, 2010 in Note 16).

3.


In October 2008,January 2010, the FASB issued FASB Staff PositionASU No. 157-3, Determining the2010-06, Fair Value of a Financial Asset When The Market for That Asset Is Not Active (“FSP 157-3”).  FSP 157-3Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820), Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. This ASU requires new disclosures and clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157 in a market that is not activeexisting disclosures regarding recurring and provides an example to illustrate key considerations in determining thenonrecurring fair value measurements to provide increased transparency to users of athe financial asset whenstatements. The new disclosures and clarification of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the marketdisclosures pertaining to the roll forward of activity for that financial asset is not active.  FSP 157-3 was effective immediately upon issuance, and includes prior periods for which financial statements have not been issued.  This Statement did not have an material impact on the consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2008.


In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115.”  This Statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items atLevel 3 fair value withmeasurements, which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. We adopted this statement, except for the objectiveroll forward of improving financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions, and is expected to expand the use ofactivity for Level 3 fair value measurement.  An entity will report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date.  The fair value option may generally be applied instrument by instrument and is irrevocable.   This S tatement was adopted by Westfield Financial onmeasurements, as of January 1, 20082010 and this adoption did not have a material impact on theour consolidated financial statements.


In June 2007,April 2010, the FASB ratified EITF Issueissued ASU No. 06-11, “Accounting2010-18, Receivables (Topic 310): Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan is Part of a Pool that is Accounted for Income Tax Benefitsas a Single Asset—a consensus of Dividendsthe FASB Emerging Issues Task Force. This ASU provides guidance on Share-Based Payment Awards,” which requires an entity to recognize,the accounting for loan modifications when the loan is part of a pool of loans accounted for as an increase to additional paid-in capital, the income taxes benefits related to dividendsa single asset such as acquired loans that have evidence of credit deterioration upon acquisition that are chargedaccounted for under the guidance in ASC 310-30. This ASU addresses diversity in practice on whether a loan that is part of a pool of loans accounted for as a single asset should be removed from that pool upon a modification that would constitute a troubled debt restructuring or remain in the pool after modification. This ASU clarifies that modifications of loans that are accounted for within a pool under ASC 310-30 do not result in the removal of those loans from the pool even if the modification of those loans would otherwise be considered a troubled debt restructuring. An entity will continue to retained earningsbe required to consider whether the pool of assets in which the loan is included is impaired if the expected cash flows for unvested equity sharesthe pool change. The amendments in this update do not require any additional disclosures and are effective for modifications of loans accounted for within pools under ASC 310-30 occurring in the first interim or options.  This EITF was adoptedannual period ending on January 1, 2008 andor after July 15, 2010. The adoption of the ASU did not have a material impact on theour consolidated financial statements of Westfield Financial.

statements.



F-13




In December 2007,July 2010, the FASB issued StatementASU No. 141 (revised 2007)2010-20, Receivables (Topic 310), “Business Combinations” (“Statement No. 141(R)”). Statement No. 141(R) establishes principlesDisclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and requirementsthe Allowance for howCredit Losses. This ASU requires an entity to provide disclosures that facilitate financial statement users’ evaluation of (1) the acquirer in a business combination recognizes and measures identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and noncontrolling interestsnature of credit risk inherent in the acquiree. Statement No. 141(R) further addressesentity’s loan portfolio (2) how goodwill acquired or a gain from a bargain purchasethat risk is to be recognizedanalyzed and measuredassessed in arriving at the allowance for loan and determines whatlease losses and (3) the changes and reasons for those changes in the allowance for loan and lease losses. For public entities, the disclosures are needed to enable usersas of the financial statements to evaluate the effects of the business combination. Statement No. 141(R) is effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier application is not permitted.


In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No.51 (“ARB No. 51”).  This Statement amends ARB No. 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidationend of a subsidiary.  It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements.  This Statement is effective on January 1, 2009 and did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements of Westfield Financial.


In March of 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.” This Statement changes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entitiesreporting period are required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. This Statement is effective on January 1, 2009 and did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements of Westfield Financial.


In December 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 132(R)-1, “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets” (“FSP 132(R)-1”). FSP 132(R)-1 amends FASB Statement No. 132 (revised 2003), “Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits”, to provide guidance on an employer’s disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. This staff position requires disclosure of information about how investment allocation decisions are made, the fair value of each major category of plan assets and the inputs and valuation techniques used to develop fair value measurements. Also, an employer shall provide users of financial statements with an understanding of significant concentrations of risk in plan assets. In addition, it requires a nonpublic entity that sponsors one or more defined benefit pension or postretirement plans to di sclose the net periodic benefit cost recognized for each annual period for which an annual statement of income is presented. The disclosures about plan assets are required for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009 and are not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements of Westfield Financial.  The requirement to disclose the net periodic benefit cost is effective as of December 31, 2008.  This disclosure has been provided in these consolidated financial statements and did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2008.  Upon initial adoption of FSP 132(R)-1, disclosures are not required for earlier periods that are presented for comparative purposes.


In January 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. EITF 99-20-1, “Amendments to the Impairment Guidance of EITF Issue No.99-20” (“FSP 99-20-1”).  FSP 99-20-1 amends the impairment guidance in EITF Issue No. 99-20, “Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests That Continue to Be Held by a Transferor in Securitized  Financial Assets,” to achieve more consistent determination of whether an other than temporary impairment has occurred.  The FSP also retains and emphasizes the objective of an other than temporary impairment assessment and the related disclosure requirements in FASB Statement No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,” and other related guidance.  FSP 99-20-1 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2008. This Statement did2010. The disclosures about activity that occurs during a reporting period are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. We have provided the disclosures required as of December 31, 2010 in Note 3.

F-14

In January 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-01, Receivables (Topic 310) Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in ASU No. 2010-20. The amendments in this ASU temporarily delay the effective date of disclosures about troubled debt restructurings as required by ASU No. 2010-20 for public entities in order to allow FASB to complete deliberations on what constitutes troubled debt restructuring. At that point, the effective date for such disclosures and guidance for determining what constitutes troubled debt restructurings will be coordinated. Currently, that guidance is anticipated to be effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2011. We do not believe the adoption of this ASU will have a material impact on theour consolidated financial statements of Westfield Financial at December 31, 2008.

statements.

F-15

2.        SECURITIES


F-14




2.

SECURITIES


Securities are summarized as follows:

  December 31, 2010 
  
Amortized
Cost
  
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
  
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value 
  (In thousands) 
Available for sale:            
Government-sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities $381,436  $4,967  $(5,419) $380,984 
U.S. government guaranteed  residential mortgage-backed securities  192,609   396   (5,329)  187,676 
Private-label residential mortgage-backed securities  8,251   -   (673)  7,578 
Government-sponsored enterprise obligations  18,447   193   (776)  17,864 
Municipal bonds  42,119   1,298   (340)  43,077 
Mutual funds  6,949   25   (61)  6,913 
Common and preferred stock  70   -   (23)  47 
                 
Total $649,881  $6,879  $(12,621) $644,139 
                 

 

December 31, 2008

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Gross
Unrealized
Gains

 

Gross
Unrealized
Losses

 

Estimated
Fair Value

 

(In thousands)

Held to maturity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Government-sponsored enterprises

$     44,906

 

$       2,900

 

$              -

 

$     47,806

    Municipal bonds

34,397

 

467

 

179

 

34,685

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total held to maturity

79,303

 

3,367

 

179

 

82,491

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available for sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Government-sponsored enterprises

16,018

 

281

 

-

 

16,299

    Municipal bonds

1,957

 

27

 

14

 

1,970

    Equity securities

6,301

 

-

 

174

 

6,127

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total available for sale

24,276

 

308

 

188

 

24,396

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total securities

$    103,579

 

$       3,675

 

$          367

 

$    106,887

  December 31, 2009 
  
Amortized
Cost
  
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value 
  (In thousands) 
Available for sale:            
Government-sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities $289,840  $2,696  $(2,288) $290,248 
U.S. government guaranteed  residential mortgage-backed securities  1,030   17   -   1,047 
Private-label residential mortgage-backed securities  10,368   -   (1,858)  8,510 
Government-sponsored enterprise obligations  11,000   -   (302)  10,698 
Municipal bonds  1,956   114   -   2,070 
Mutual funds  6,561   1   (73)  6,489 
Common and preferred stock  70   -   (11)  59 
                 
Total available for sale  320,825   2,828   (4,532)  319,121 
                 
Held to maturity:                
Government-sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities  204,484   6,111   (184)  210,411 
U.S. government guaranteed  residential mortgage-backed securities  16,334   95   (143)  16,286 
Private-label residential mortgage-backed securities  4,949   44   (435)  4,558 
Government-sponsored enterprise obligations  34,884   1,776   -   36,660 
Municipal bonds  34,360   1,353   (9)  35,704 
                 
Total held to maturity  295,011   9,379   (771)  303,619 
                 
Total securities $615,836  $12,207  $(5,303) $622,740 
F-16

In August 2010, we transferred all of our held-to-maturity investments to the available-for-sale category.  We determined that we no longer had the positive intent to hold our securities classified as held-to-maturity for an indefinite period of time because of our desire to have more flexibility in managing the investment portfolio.  The securities transferred had a total amortized cost of $287.1 million, fair value of $299.7 million and the net unrealized gain of $12.6 million was recorded as other comprehensive income at the time of transfer.

 

December 31, 2007

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Gross
Unrealized
Gains

 

Gross
Unrealized
Losses

 

Estimated
Fair Value

 

(In thousands)

Held to maturity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Government-sponsored enterprises

$     71,884

 

$       1,444

 

$            20

 

$     73,308

    Municipal bonds

32,141

 

442

 

62

 

32,521

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total held to maturity

104,025

 

1,886

 

82

 

105,829

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available for sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Government-sponsored enterprises

30,022

 

308

 

-

 

30,330

    Municipal bonds

852

 

29

 

-

 

881

    Equity Securities

7,364

 

-

 

524

 

6,840

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total available for sale

38,238

 

337

 

524

 

38,051

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Securities

$    142,263

 

$       2,223

 

$          606

 

$    143,880

The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities, excluding mortgage-backed securities, at December 31, 2010, by maturity, are shown below.  Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because certain issuers have the right to call or repay obligations.

  December 31, 2010 
  
Amortized
Cost
  Fair Value 
  (In thousands) 
Available for sale:      
Due in one year or less $896  $902 
Due after one year through five years  18,311   18,811 
Due after five years through ten years  21,361   21,960 
Due after ten years  19,998   19,268 
         
   Total available for sale $60,566  $60,941 

Gross realized gains and losses on sales of securities for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
  Years Ended Decmeber 31, 
  2010  2009  2008 
  (In thousands) 
Gross gains realized $6,346  $2,033  $1,246 
Gross losses realized  (2,274)  (2,416)  (168)
Net gain (loss) realized $4,072  $(383) $1,078 

F-15

Proceeds from the sale of securities available for sale amounted to $497.0 million, $149.8 million and $109.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

The tax provision applicable to net realized gains and losses were $1.4 million, $197,000 and $407,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.


One security with a carrying value of $2.2 and $5.0 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, was pledged as collateral to the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston to secure public deposits.
F-17

Information pertaining to securities with gross unrealized losses at December 31, 20082010 and 2007,2009, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position, follows:


 

December 31, 2008

 

Less Than Twelve Months

 

Over Twelve Months

 

Gross
Unrealized
Losses

 

Fair Value

 

Gross
Unrealized
Losses

 

Fair Value

 

(In thousands)

Held to maturity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Municipal bonds

$         155

 

$      6,677

 

$           24

 

$      1,585

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total held to maturity

155

 

6,677

 

24

 

1,585

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available for sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Municipal bonds

14

 

1,093

 

-

 

-

Equity securities

-

 

-

 

174

 

3,842

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total available for sale

14

 

1,093

 

174

 

3,842

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

$         169

 

$      7,770

 

$         198

 

$      5,427


 

December 31, 2007

 

Less Than Twelve Months

 

Over Twelve Months

 

Gross
Unrealized
Losses

 

Fair Value

 

Gross
Unrealized
Losses

 

Fair Value

 

(In thousands)

Held to maturity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Government-sponsored enterprises

$             -

 

$             -

 

$           20

 

$      7,992

Municipal bonds

27

 

3,131

 

35

 

2,777

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total held to maturity

27

 

3,131

 

55

 

10,769

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available for sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Equity Securities

-

 

-

 

524

 

5,477

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total available for sale

-

 

-

 

524

 

5,477

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

$           27

 

$      3,131

 

$         579

 

$     16,246


  December 31, 2010 
  Less Than Twelve Months  Over Twelve Months 
  
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value  
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value 
  (In thousands) 
Available for sale:            
Government-sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities $(5,419) $225,105  $-  $- 
U.S. government guaranteed  residential mortgage-backed securities  (5,329)  145,430   -   - 
Private-label residential mortgage-backed securities  -   -   (673)  7,578 
Government-sponsored enterprise obligations  (776)  15,674   -   - 
Municipal bonds  (340)  8,856   -   - 
Mutual funds  -   -   (61)  1,548 
Common and preferred stock  -   -   (23)  16 
                 
Total $(11,864) $395,065  $(757) $9,142 
                 
  December 31, 2009 
  Less Than Twelve Months  Over Twelve Months 
  
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value  
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value 
  (In thousands) 
Available for sale:                
Government-sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities $(2,287) $170,741  $(1) $128 
Private-label residential mortgage-backed securities  -   -   (1,858)  8,510 
Government-sponsored enterprise obligations  (302)  10,698   -   - 
Mutual funds  (19)  2,597   (54)  1,479 
Common and preferred stock  (11)  28   -   - 
                 
Total available for sale  (2,619)  184,064   (1,913)  10,117 
                 
Held to maturity:                
Government-sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities  (159)  21,227   (25)  1,677 
U.S. government guaranteed  residential mortgage-backed securities  (143)  9,760   -   - 
Private-label residential mortgage-backed securities  -   -   (435)  3,123 
Municipal bonds  (9)  356   -   - 
                 
Total held to maturity  (311)  31,343   (460)  4,800 
                 
Total $(2,930) $215,407  $(2,373) $14,917 
F-18

At December 31, 2008, eleven debt2010, forty-nine government-sponsored and U.S. government guaranteed mortgage-backed securities havehad gross unrealized losses with aggregate depreciation of 2.1%2.8% from Westfield Financial’sour amortized cost basis which have existedexisting for less than twelve months.  Because these losses relate to highly rated municipal obligations, are the result of fluctuations in interest rates, and management has the intent and ability to hold these securities for the foreseeable future, no declines are deemed to be other than temporary.



F-16




At December 31, 2008, three debt securities have2010, two government-sponsored enterprise obligations had gross unrealized losses with aggregate depreciation of 1.5%4.7% from Westfield Financial’sour amortized cost basis which have existedexisting for greaterless than twelve months.  Because theseThese losses relate to highly rated municipal obligations, are the result of fluctuations in interest rates and management hasnot credit quality.  Because we do not intend to sell the intentsecurities and abilityit is more likely than not that we will not be required to hold thesesell the securities for the foreseeable future,before recovery of their amortized cost basis, no declines are deemed to be other than temporary at December 31, 2008.

other-than-temporary.


At December 31, 2008, two equity securities have2010, one mutual fund had a gross unrealized lossesloss with aggregate depreciation of 3.6%3.8% from Westfield Financial’sour cost basis which have existedexisting for greater than twelve months and arewas principally related to fluctuations in interest rates.  These losses relateThis loss relates to a mutual fundsfund which investinvests primarily in short-term debt instruments and adjustable rate mortgage-backed securities.  Because these losses arewe do not intend to sell the resultsecurity and it is more likely than not that we will not be required to sell it prior to the recovery of fluctuations in interest rates, and management hasits amortized cost basis, the intent and ability to hold these securities for the foreseeable future,no declines areloss is deemed to be other than temporary at December 31, 2008.

temporary.


At December 31, 2008, one preferred equity security had a gross unrealized loss with aggregate depreciation of 80.0% from Westfield Financial’s cost basis which existed for greater than twelve months.  In 2008, Westfield Financial recorded write-downs on preferred stock issued by Freddie Mac of $961,000.  Freddie Mac was placed into conservatorship by the United States Treasury in September 2008.  Westfield Financial’s book value remaining on preferred stock issued by Freddie Mac was $39,000 at December 31, 2008.


The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities at December 31, 2008, by maturity, are shown below.  Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because certain issues have the right to call or repay obligations.


 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2008

 

 

 

 

 

Amortized

 

Estimated

 

 

 

 

 

Cost

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

Held to maturity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Due in one year or less

 

$           -

 

$              -

 

Due after one year through five years

20,930

 

21,332

 

Due after five years through ten years

44,114

 

46,983

 

Due after ten years

 

14,259

 

14,176

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total held to maturity

 

 

$    79,303

 

$       82,491

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available for sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Due in one year or less

 

$           -

 

$              -

 

Due after one year through five years

5,018

 

5,161

 

Due after five years through ten years

850

 

877

 

Due after ten years

 

12,107

 

12,231

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total available for sale

 

 

$    17,975

 

$       18,269


Proceeds from the sale of securities available for sale amounted to $ 20.3 million, $15.1 million and $5.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.


Gross realized gains of $293,000, $51,000 and $0, and gross realized losses of $11,000, $13,000, and $0 were recorded on securities during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.  Westfield Financial recorded gross losses of $1.3 million due to other than temporary impairment in value of securities during the year ended December 31, 2008.  There were no impairment losses recognized during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.


At December 31, 2008 and 2007, one security with a carrying value of $4.9 million was pledged as collateral to the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston to secure public deposits.



F-17




3.

MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES


Mortgage-backed securities are summarized as follows:


 

December 31, 2008

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Gross
Unrealized
Gains

 

Gross
Unrealized
Losses

 

Estimated
Fair Value

 

(In thousands)

Held to maturity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fannie Mae

$     89,910

 

$       1,207

 

$          341

 

$      90,776

Freddie Mac

64,067

 

1,264

 

225

 

65,106

Ginnie Mae

7,892

 

1

 

340

 

7,553

Collateralized mortgage obligations

6,463

 

-

 

1,182

 

5,281

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total held to maturity

168,332

 

2,472

 

2,088

 

168,716

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available for sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fannie Mae

105,397

 

476

 

569

 

105,304

Freddie Mac

56,529

 

642

 

199

 

56,972

Ginnie Mae

40,401

 

181

 

158

 

40,424

Collateralized mortgage obligations

42,453

 

-

 

11,406

 

31,047

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total available for sale

244,780

 

1,299

 

12,332

 

233,747

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total mortgage-backed securities

$    413,112

 

$       3,771

 

$     14,420

 

$    402,463


 

December 31, 2007

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Gross
Unrealized
Gains

 

Gross
Unrealized
Losses

 

Estimated
Fair Value

 

(In thousands)

Held to maturity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fannie Mae

$    102,354

 

$          669

 

$          753

 

$    102,270

Freddie Mac

55,251

 

341

 

259

 

55,333

Ginnie Mae

10,208

 

18

 

30

 

10,196

Collateralized mortgage obligations

6,781

 

35

 

65

 

6,751

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total held to maturity

174,594

 

1,063

 

1,107

 

174,550

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available for sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fannie Mae

74,062

 

669

 

73

 

74,658

Freddie Mac

86,411

 

917

 

126

 

87,202

Ginnie Mae

5,674

 

29

 

16

 

5,687

Collateralized mortgage obligations

39,063

 

75

 

507

 

38,631

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total available for sale

205,210

 

1,690

 

722

 

206,178

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total mortgage backed securities

$    379,804

 

$       2,753

 

$       1,829

 

$    380,728






F-18




Proceeds from the sale of mortgage-backed securities available for sale amounted to $88.9 million, $272,000 and $0 at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.


Gross realized gains of $953,000, $3,000 and $0 and gross realized losses of $157,000, $0, and $0 were recorded on sales of mortgage-backed securities during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.


Information pertaining to securities with gross unrealized losses at December 31, 2008 and 2007 aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position, follows:


 

December 31, 2008

 

Less Than Twelve Months

 

Over Twelve Months

 

Gross
Unrealized
Losses

 

Fair Value

 

Gross
Unrealized
Losses

 

Fair Value

 

(In thousands)

Held to maturity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fannie Mae

$          216

 

$      14,402

 

$          125

 

$       8,662

Freddie Mac

141

 

13,742

 

84

 

2,667

Ginnie Mae

266

 

5,482

 

74

 

1,867

Collateralized mortgage obligations

1,182

 

5,282

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total held to maturity

1,805

 

38,908

 

283

 

13,196

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available for sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fannie Mae

479

 

42,746

 

90

 

11,416

Freddie Mac

147

 

9,802

 

52

 

10,794

Ginnie Mae

147

 

3,842

 

11

 

251

Collateralized mortgage obligations

6,953

 

28,423

 

4,453

 

2,624

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total available for sale

7,726

 

84,813

 

4,606

 

25,085

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

$       9,531

 

$    123,721

 

$       4,889

 

$     38,281




F-19





 

December 31, 2007

 

Less Than Twelve Months

 

Over Twelve Months

 

Gross
Unrealized
Losses

 

Fair Value

 

Gross
Unrealized
Losses

 

Fair Value

 

(In thousands)

Held to maturity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fannie Mae

$             2

 

$          484

 

$          751

 

$     43,522

Freddie Mac

27

 

3,612

 

232

 

10,717

Ginnie Mae

5

 

2,376

 

25

 

3,115

Collateralized mortgage obligations

65

 

4,458

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total held to maturity

99

 

10,930

 

1,008

 

57,354

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available for sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fannie Mae

2

 

2,294

 

71

 

13,070

Freddie Mac

67

 

8,624

 

59

 

6,803

Ginnie Mae

1

 

236

 

15

 

2,585

Collateralized mortgage obligations

471

 

23,104

 

36

 

2,596

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total available for sale

541

 

34,258

 

181

 

25,054

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

$          640

 

$     45,188

 

$       1,189

 

$     82,408


At December 31, 2008, eighty-eight mortgage-backed securities have gross unrealized losses with aggregate depreciation of 7.2% from Westfield Financial’s amortized cost basis which have existed for less than twelve months.  At December 31, 2008, thirty-two2010, four private label mortgage-backed securities have gross unrealized losses of 1.2%8.2% from Westfield Financial’sour amortized cost basis which existed for greater than twelve months.  Because these losses relate toOn a quarterly basis, Management uses a third party that is experienced in analyzing private-label mortgage-backed securities which were primarily issued by government-sponsored enterprises,to determine if credit losses existed for these securities.  The third party incorporated a number of factors to estimate the performance and possible credit loss of the underlying assets.  These factors include but are thenot limited to: loans in various stages of delinquency i.e. 30, 60, 90 days delinquent, loans in foreclosure, projected prepayment rates (15 voluntary prepayment rate), severity of loss on defaulted loans (40% -55%), current levels of subordination, current credit enhancement (3.55% - 7.87%), vintage (2006), geographic location and projected default rates.  As a result of an illiquid market,this analysis, two private label mortgage-backed securities were deemed to have other-than- temporary impairment losses during the year ended December 31, 2010, which resulted in writedowns of $590,000 due to other-than-temporary impairment on mortgage-backed securities, of which $443,000 was recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss and management has$147,000 was recognized as a credit loss and charged to income.  During the intentyear ended December 31, 2009, we had writedowns of $1.8 million due to other-than-temporary impairment on mortgage-backed securities, of which $1.5 million was recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss and ability$278,000 was recognized as a credit loss and charged to hold theseincome.


The following table presents a roll-forward of the amount of credit losses on mortgage-backed securities for the foreseeable future, no declineswhich a portion of other-than-temporary impairment was recognized in other comprehensive income:

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2010  2009 
  (In thousands) 
       
Balance at beginning of year $278  $0 
         
Additional credit losses for which other-than-temporary impairment charge was previously recorded  147   278 
         
Balance at end of year $425  $278 
F-19

3.        LOANS

Loans consisted of the following amounts: December 31, 
  2010  2009 
  (In thousands) 
       
Commercial real estate $221,578  $229,061 
Residential real estate  112,680   64,299 
Home equity  36,116   34,755 
Commercial and industrial  135,250   145,012 
Consumer  2,960   3,307 
    Total Loans  508,584   476,434 
Unearned premiums and deferred loan fees and costs, net  742   360 
Allowance for loan losses  (6,934)  (7,645)
  $502,392  $469,149 

During 2010, we purchased residential real estate loans aggregating $61.9 million.

We have transferred a portion of our originated commercial real estate loans to participating lenders.  The amounts transferred have been accounted for as sales and are deemed to be other than temporary at December 31, 2008.


At December 31, 2008 two mortgage-backed securities had gross unrealizedtherefore not included in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets.  We share ratably with our participating lenders in any gains or losses that may result from a borrower’s lack of 62.9% from Westfield Financial’s amortized cost basis of temporarily impaired debt securities which existed for greater than twelve months. The securities are privately issued collateralized mortgage obligations. Management determined that an orderly and active market for these securities did not exist based on a significant reduction in trading volume and widening spreads during the third quarter of 2008. Westfield Financial’s internal model estimates expected future cash flows discounted using a rate management believes is representative of current market conditions. Factors in determining the discount rate include the current level of deferrals and/or defaults, changes in credit rating and the financial condition of the debtors within the underlying securities, broker quotes for securitiescompliance with similar structure and credit risk, interest rate movements an d pricing of new issuances. Based upon the above analysis, management believes it is probable that all principal and interest will be collected in accordance with the contractual terms of the securities. Westfield Financial hasloan.  We continue to service the intentloans on behalf of the participating lenders and, abilityas such, collect cash payments from the borrowers, remit payments (net of servicing fees) to holdparticipating lenders and disburse required escrow funds to relevant parties.  At December 31, 2010 and 2009, we serviced loans for participants aggregating $5.2 million and $5.4 million, respectively.


An analysis of changes in the allowance for loan losses is as follows: 
  Years Ended December 31, 
  2010  2009  2008 
  (In thousands) 
          
Balance, beginning of year $7,645  $8,796  $5,726 
Provision  8,923   3,900   3,453 
Charge-offs  (9,717)  (5,099)  (449)
Recoveries  83   48   66 
             
Balance, end of year $6,934  $7,645  $8,796 

Further information pertaining to the securities. No declines are deemed to be other than temporaryallowance for loan losses by segment at December 31, 2008.

2010 follows:



  
Residential
Real
Estate
  
Commercial
Real
Estate
  
Commercial
and
Industrial
  Consumer  Total 
  (In thousands) 
Amount of allowance for loan losses for
loans deemed to be impaired
 $-  $-  $19  $-  $19 
Amount of allowance for loan losses not
deemed to be impaired
  877   3,182   2,830   26   6,915 
Loans deemed to be impaired  125   1,891   539   -   2,555 
Loans not deemed to be impaired  148,671   219,687   134,711   2,960   506,029 
F-20




4.

LOANS


Loans consisted of the following amounts:


 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

2008

 

2007

 

 

 

 

 

 (In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial real estate

 

 

$    223,857 

 

$    189,964 

Residential real estate

 

 

62,810 

 

72,170 

Home equity

 

 

 

 

35,562 

 

35,940 

Commercial and industrial

 

 

153,861 

 

116,514 

Consumer

 

 

 

 

4,248 

 

5,479 

    Total loans

 

 

 

 

480,338 

 

420,067 

Unearned premiums and deferred loan fees and costs, net

593 

 

561 

Allowance for loan losses

 

 

(8,796)

 

(5,726)

 

 

 

 

 

$    472,135 

 

$    414,902 



The following tables summarizeis a summary of past due and non-accrual loans by class at December 31, 2010:
                   
  
30 – 59
Days Past
Due
  
60 – 89
Days Past
Due
  
Greater
than 90
Days Past
Due
  
Total Past
Due
  
Past Due
90 Days or
More and
Still
Accruing
  
Loans in
Non-
Accrual
 
  (In thousands) 
Residential real estate:                  
Residential 1-4 family $196  $459  $172  $827  $-  $629 
Home equity  121   -   138   259   -   144 
Commercial real estate  14,797   -   919   15,716   -   1,891 
Commercial and industrial  204   1,000   150   1,354   -   539 
Consumer  7   -   -   7   -   1 
Total $15,325  $1,459  $1,379  $18,163  $-  $3,204 

Loans in non-accrual were $5.5 million at December 31, 2009.  At December 31, 2010 and 2009, no loans were delinquent for ninety days or more and still accruing.

The following table summary of impaired loans by class at December 31, 2010
  December 31, 2010 
  
Recorded
Investment
  
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
  
Related
Allowance
 
  (In thousands) 
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance:         
Residential real estate $125  $127  $- 
Commercial real estate  1,891   1,939   - 
Commercial and Industrial  389   1,374   - 
Total  2,405   3,440   - 
             
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance:            
Commercial and Industrial  150   150   19 
             
Total impaired loans $2,555  $3,590  $19 

The following is a summary of information regardingpertaining to impaired loans:

loans at December 31, 2009.


 

Years Ended December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

Impaired loans without a valuation allowance

$        753

 

$        196

Impaired loans with a valuation allowance

7,095

 

-

Total impaired loans

$     7,848

 

$        196

 

 

 

 

Valuation allowance related to impaired loans

$     2,286

 

$             -

 

 

 

 

Impaired loans in nonaccrual status

$     7,848

 

$        196

  December 31, 
  2009 
  (In thousands) 
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance $192 
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance  4,450 
Total impaired loans $4,642 
     
Valuation allowance related to impaired loans $875 
     
Impaired loans in nonaccrual status $4,642 
F-21

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2010  2009  2008 
  (In thousands) 
Average recorded investment in impaired loans $3,378  $4,875  $2,134 
Income recorded on cash basis during the period for impaired loans  -   -   - 

 

Years Ended

 

December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

(Dollars in Thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average recorded investment in impaired loans

$     1,717

 

$        119

 

$        490

Income recorded on cash basis during the period for

-

 

28

 

300

  impaired loans

 

 

 

 

 


No additional funds are committed to be advanced in connection with impaired loans.


There were no restructured loans during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.



F-21




Nonaccrual loans at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 and related interest income are summarized as follows:


 

At of For the Years Ended

 

December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nonaccrual loans

 $     8,805

 

 $     1,202

 

 $     1,028

Interest income that would have been recorded under the

 

 

 

 

 

original contract terms

           200

 

             65

 

             67


Mortgage loans serviced for others are not included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.  The unpaid balances of these loans totaled $8.4$3.9 million and $10.5$5.7 million at December 31, 20082010 and 2007,2009, respectively.  Net service fee income of $11,000, $15,000, $17,000, and $22,000$15,000 was recorded for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007,2010, 2009, and 2006,2008, respectively, and is included in service charges and fees on the consolidated statements of income.


An analysis

Credit Quality Information

We utilize an eight-grade internal loan rating system for commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans as follows:

Loans rated 1 – 3: Loans in these categories are considered “Pass” rated loans with low to average risk.

Loans rated 4: Loans in this category are considered “Pass Watch,” which represent loans to borrowers with declining earnings, losses, or strained cash flow.

Loans rated 5: Loans in this category are considered “Special Mention.” These loans exhibit potential credit weaknesses or downward trends and are being closely monitored by us.

Loans rated 6: Loans in this category are considered “Substandard.” Generally, a loan is considered substandard if the borrower exhibits a well-defined weakness that may be inadequately protected by the current net worth and cash flow capacity to pay the current debt.

Loans rated 7: Loans in this category are considered “Doubtful.” Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of changescurrently existing facts, highly questionable and improbable and that a partial loss of principal is likely.

Loans rated 8: Loans in this category are considered uncollectible (“Loss”) and of such little value that their continuance as loans is not warranted.

On an annual basis, or more often if needed, we formally review the allowance for loan losses isratings on all commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans. Construction loans are reported within commercial real estate loans and total $4.3 million at December 31, 2010.  We engage an independent third-party to review a significant portion of loans within these segments on at least an annual basis. We use the results of these reviews as follows:

part of our annual review process.


 

Years Ended December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

 (In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

        Balance, beginning of year

 $     5,726 

 

 $     5,437 

 

 $     5,422 

        Provision

        3,453 

 

           400 

 

           390 

        Charge-offs

          (449)

 

          (317)

 

          (584)

        Recoveries

             66 

 

           206 

 

           209 

 

 

 

 

 

 

        Balance, end of year

 $     8,796 

 

 $     5,726 

 

 $     5,437 

The following table presents our loans by risk rating at December 31, 2010.

  
Commercial
Real
Estate
  
Commercial and
Industrial
 
Loans rated 1 – 3 $174,137  $83,650 
Loans rated 4  24,149   32,723 
Loans rated 5  3,164   7,424 
Loans rated 6  20,128   11,453 
Loans rated 7  -   - 
  $221,578  $135,250 


F-22




5.


4.        PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT


Premises and equipment are summarized as follows:


 

 

Years Ended

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

2008

 

2007

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

Land

 $         1,826 

 

 $         1,826 

Buildings

          11,769 

 

          11,751 

Leasehold improvements

            1,435 

 

            1,435 

Furniture and equipment

            7,629 

 

            7,173 

Construction in process

                90 

 

                28 

Total

          22,749 

 

          22,213 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated depreciation and amortization

         (10,683)

 

           (9,501)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Premises and equipment, net

 $       12,066 

 

 $       12,712 

  December 31, 
  2010  2009 
  (In thousands) 
       
Land $1,826  $1,826 
Buildings  12,572   12,393 
Leasehold improvements  1,435   1,435 
Furniture and equipment  8,947   8,462 
Construction in process  -   2 
Total  24,780   24,118 
         
Accumulated depreciation and amortization  (13,177)  (11,916)
         
Premises and equipment, net $11,603  $12,202 

Depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007,2010, 2009, and 20062008 amounted to $1.3 million, $1.3 million, and $1.2 million, $1.1 million, and $1.0 million, respectively.


6.

5.        DEPOSITS


Deposit accounts by type and weighted average rates are summarized as follows:


 

At December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

Amount

 

Rate

 

Amount

 

Rate

 

(Dollars in thousands)

Demand and NOW:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOW accounts

$     83,788

 

1.17

%

 

$     85,316

 

1.62

%

Demand deposits

50,860

 

-

 

 

42,408

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Savings:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regular accounts

68,085

 

1.05

 

 

47,072

 

1.24

 

Money market accounts

57,655

 

0.94

 

 

74,601

 

1.24

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Time certificates of deposit

327,641

 

3.43

 

 

353,279

 

4.44

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total deposits

$    588,029

 

2.29

%

 

$    602,676

 

3.08

%

  December 31, 
  2010  2009 
  Amount  Rate  Amount  Rate 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
Demand and NOW:            
NOW accounts $83,621   1.08% $70,462   1.42%
Demand deposits  85,217   -   80,110   - 
                 
Savings:                
Regular accounts  101,333   0.62   104,650   0.88 
Money market accounts  76,184   0.57   50,120   0.74 
                 
Time certificates of deposit  353,980   1.98   342,633   2.49 
                 
Total deposits $700,335   1.28% $647,975   1.65%

Time deposits of $100,000 or more totaled $86.7$115.5 million and $90.8$97.8 million at December 31, 20082010 and 2007,2009, respectively.  Interest expense on such deposits totaled $3.3$2.2 million, $4.4$2.8 million and $3.6$3.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, 2007, and 2006 respectively.




F-23




Cash paid for interest on deposits and borrowings was:


 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits

 

 $     15,141

 

 $     19,429

 

 $     17,249

Short-term borrowings

 

             928

 

             720

 

             581

Long-term debt

 

          6,075

 

          2,892

 

          1,642

 

 

 $     22,144

 

 $     23,041

 

 $     19,472



At December 31, 2008,2010, the scheduled maturities of time certificates of deposit (in thousands) are as follows:


2009

 

$       245,939

2010

 

51,244

2011

 

27,383

2012

 

2,637

2013

 

438

 

 

$       327,641

Year Ending
December 31,
 Amount 
  (In thousands) 
    
2011 $236,926 
2012  31,356 
2013  41,226 
2014  36,540 
2015  7,932 
  $353,980 

Interest expense on deposits for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007,2010, 2009, and 20062008 is summarized as follows:


 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Savings

 

 $          748

 

 $          329

 

 $          226

Money market

 

             763

 

          1,301

 

          1,684

Time

 

        12,417

 

        16,574

 

        14,450

Other interest bearing

 

          1,205

 

          1,340

 

             908

 

 

 $     15,133

 

 $     19,544

 

 $     17,268

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2010  2009  2008 
  (In thousands) 
Savings $823  $955  $748 
Money market  358   467   763 
Time  7,735   10,034   12,417 
Other interest-bearing  934   1,238   1,205 
  $9,850  $12,694  $15,133 

7.

Cash paid for interest on deposits totaled $9.8 million, $12.8 million and $15.1 million for years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.


6.        SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS


Federal Home Loan Bank

FHLB AdvancesFederal Home Loan Bank FHLB advances with an original maturity of less than one year, amounted to $25.0$50.6 million and $18.0$58.0 million at December 31, 20082010 and 2007,2009, respectively, at a weighted average rate of 0.53%0.30% and 4.68%0.23%, respectively.


Westfield Financial has

We have an “Ideal Way” line of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank of BostonFHLB for $9,541,000$9.5 million for the years ended December 31, 20082009 and 2007.2010.  Interest on this line of credit is payable at a rate determined and reset by the Federal Home Loan BankFHLB on a daily basis.  The outstanding principal shall be due daily but the portion not repaid will be automatically renewed.  At December 31, 2008 and 2007, there was $3.5 million and $444,000, respectively,2010, $101,000 in advances were outstanding under this line.  Theline with a weighted average interest rate on outstanding principal balance was 0.46%of 0.52%, and 4.20% atis reported in short-term borrowings.  At December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

2009, there were no advances outstanding under this line.


Federal Home Loan Bank

FHLB advances are collateralized by a blanket lien on Westfield Financial’sour residential real estate loans and certain mortgage-back securities.



F-24





Customer Repurchase Agreements – The following table summarizes information regarding repurchase agreements:

  Years Ended 
  December 31, 
  2010  2009 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
Balance outstanding, end of year $12,336  $16,499 
Maximum amount outstanding at any month end during year  20,321   25,834 
Average amount outstanding during year  14,459   22,835 
Weighted average interest rate, end of year  0.40%  1.29%
Amortized cost of collateral pledged, end of year (1)  30,787   37,640 
Fair value of collateral pledged, end of year (1)  32,086   39,376 
(1)Includes collateral pledged toward $5.0 million in long-term customer repurchase agreements.

 

Years Ended
December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

Balance outstanding, end of year

 $         21,274

 

 $         16,824

Maximum amount outstanding at any month end during year

            21,693

 

            23,619

Average amount outstanding during year

            18,079

 

            19,967

Weighted average interest rate, end of year

1.40%

 

2.65%

Amortized cost of collateral pledged, end of year

            35,317

 

            44,477

Fair value of collateral pledged, end of year

            37,338

 

            45,299


Westfield Financial‘s

Our repurchase agreements are collateralized by government-sponsored enterprises and certain mortgage-backed securities.  The weighted average interest rate on the pledged collateral was 4.60% and 4.92% at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Cash paid for interest on short-term borrowings totaled $375,000, $341,000, and certain mortgage-backed securities.  The weighted average interest rate on the pledged collateral was 4.97% at$928,000 for years ended December 31, 2008.

2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.


8.

7.        LONG-TERM DEBT


Federal Home Loan Bank

FHLB Advances– The following fixed rate advances are collateralized by a blanket lien on Westfield Financial’sour residential real estate loans and certain mortgage-backed securities.

        Weighted Average 
  Amount  Rate 
  December 31,  December 31, 
  2010  2009  2010  2009 
    (In thousands)   
Fixed rate advances maturing:            
2010 $5,150  $25,000   1.7%  2.6%
2011  34,605   21,650   2.0   2.1 
2012  31,650   39,150   2.5   3.6 
2013  29,887   16,650   3.0   3.1 
2014  27,000   15,000   3.6   3.8 
2015  14,000   10,000   2.7   3.8 
   142,292   127,450   2.7   3.1 
Variable rate advances maturing:                
2015  9,336   -   2.4   - 
                 
Total advances $151,628  $127,450   2.7%  3.1%

 

Amount
December 31,

 

Weighted Average
Rate
December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

2008

 

2007

Year of Maturity

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2008

$              -

 

$    20,000

 

-

%

 

4.7

%

2009

45,000

 

30,000

 

4.2

 

 

4.8

 

2010

40,000

 

30,000

 

4.3

 

 

4.5

 

2011

5,000

 

-

 

3.5

 

 

-

 

2012

20,000

 

20,000

 

4.6

 

 

4.6

 

2014

5,000

 

5,000

 

5.0

 

 

5.0

 

Total advances

$  115,000

 

$  105,000

 

4.3

%

 

4.7

%

No FHLB advances were callable at December 31, 2010.

At December 31, 2008, Westfield Financial2010 and 2009, mortgage-backed securities pledged as collateral to the FHLBB had $20.0a carrying value of $233.7 million and 240.3 million, respectively.
F-25

Customer Repurchase Agreements - At December 31, 2010, we had one long-term customer repurchase agreement for $5.2 million with a rate of 2.50% and a final maturity in callable Federal Home Loan Bank2011.  At December 31, 2009, we had one long-term customer repurchase agreement for $5.0 million with a rate of Boston advances callable2.5% and a final maturity in March 2009.

2010.




F-25




Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase– The following securities sold under agreements to repurchase  mature on a daily basis and are secured by government sponsoredgovernment-sponsored enterprise securities with a carrying value of $67.6$97.6 million.

        Weighted Average 
  Amount  Rate 
  December 31,  December 31, 
  2010  2009  2010  2009 
  (In thousands)    
Fixed rate advances maturing:            
2013 $14,800  $14,800   2.5%  2.5%
2014  28,000   28,000   3.1   3.1 
2018  29,500   29,500   2.9   2.9 
   72,300   72,300   2.9   2.9 
Variable rate advances maturing:                
2018  9,000   9,000   3.8   1.9 
                 
Total advances $81,300  $81,300   3.0%  2.8%

 

Amount Due

 

Weighted
Average
Rate

Year of Maturity  

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

2013

$    9,800

 

2.4

%

2018

48,500

 

2.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total advances

$  58,300

 

2.6

%

At December 31, 2010, we had $48.3 million in callable securities sold under agreements to repurchase.  At December 31, 2010, the years in which securities sold under agreements to repurchase are callable are as follows:

Westfield Financial had no securities sold under agreements to repurchase at

     Weighted Average
  Amount  Rate
  (In thousands)    
       
2011 $38,300   2.9%
2012  10,000   3.1 
  $48,300   2.9%

Cash paid for interest on long-term debt totaled $6.5 million, $7.0 million and $6.1 million for years ended December 31, 2007.


At December 31,2010, 2009, and 2008, Westfield Financial had $58.3 million in callable securities sold under agreements to repurchase.  At December 31, 2008, the years in which securities sold under agreements to repurchase are callable are as follows:  

respectively.


 

 

 (In thousands)

2009

 

 $        10,000

2010

 

           28,800

2011

 

             9,500

2012

 

           10,000

 

 

 $        58,300




F-26




9.

8.        STOCK PLANS AND EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN


Stock Options -Under Westfield Financial’sour 2002 Stock Option Plan and 2007 Stock Option Plan, Westfield Financialwe may grant options to itsour directors, officers, and employees offor up to 1,631,682 shares and 1,560,101, respectively, shares respectively, of common stock.stock, of which 1,631,682 and 1,425,869, respectively, have been granted.  At December 31, 134,232 were available for future grants under these plans.  Both incentive stock options and non-statutory stock options may be granted under the plan.  The exercise price of each option equals the market price of Westfield Financial’sour stock on the date of grant with a maximum term of ten years.  All options currently outstanding vest at 20% per year.


The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the binomial option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:


Year Ended
December 31,

2007

Options granted under the 2002 Stock Option Plan:

Expected dividend yield low

1.98

%

Expected dividend yield high

3.00

%

Expected life

10

years

Expected volitility

16.39

%

Risk-free interest rate

4.83

%

Options granted under the 2007 Stock Option Plan:

Expected dividend yield low

1.99

%

Expected dividend yield high

3.00

%

Expected life

10

years

Expected volitility

20.39

%

Risk-free interest rate

4.53

%


No stock options were granted

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2010  2009 
Expected dividend yield 7.04% 6.35%
Expected volatility 35.83% 36.09%
Risk-free interest rate 2.48% 2.78%
Expected life 10 years 10 years
       
No stock options were granted during the year ended December 31, 2008. 
F-26

The expected volatility is based on historical volatility.  The risk-free rates for period consistent with the expected term of the awards are based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in 2008 or 2006.

effect at the time of grant.  The expected term is based on historical exercise.  The dividend yield assumption is based on our history and expectation of dividend payouts.


A summary of the status of Westfield Financial’sour stock options at December 31, 20082010 is presented below:

  Shares  
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
  
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 
        (In years)  (In thousands) 
Outstanding at December 31, 2009  2,223,012  $8.36       
Granted  25,000   10.04       
Exercised  (336,527)  4.39       
Outstanding at December 31, 2010  1,911,485   9.08   5.84   1,578 
                 
Exercisable at December 31, 2010  1,271,141  $8.59   5.37   1,578 

 

Shares

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

 

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term

 

Aggregate
Intrinsic Value

 

 

 

 

 

(In years)

 

(In thousands)

Outstanding at December 31, 2007

2,709,333 

 

$   7.54

 

 

 

 

Exercised

(433,110)

 

4.39

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2008

2,276,223 

 

8.15

 

6.9

 

$      4,950

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercisable at December 31, 2008

1,073,097 

 

$   6.02

 

5.0

 

$      4,617




F-27




The weighted average fair value of the options granted in 20072010 and 2009 was $2.67$1.27 and $2.36 per share.option, respectively.  The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 2007,was $1.3 million, $502,000 and 2006 was $2.4 million, $57,000, and $526,000, respectively.  Cash received for options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 2007,was $1.5 million, $449,000, and 2006 was $1.9 million, $42,000, and $563,000, respectively.


For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007,2010, 2009, and 2006,2008, share-based compensation expense applicable to stock options was $798,000, $899,000, and $770,000, $418,000, and $317,000, respectively, and awith related tax benefitbenefits of $212,000, $242,000, and $185,000, $101,000, and $69,000, respectively.


At December 31, 2008,2010, total unrecognized share-based compensation cost related to unvested stock options was $3.1$1.5 million.  This amount is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.81.9 years.


Restricted Stock Awards– During 2002 and 2007, Westfield Financialwe adopted equity incentive plans under which 652,664 and 624,041 shares, respectively, were reserved for issuance as restricted stock awards to directors and employees.  Of these totals, 652,664 and 589,100 shares, respectively, are currently issued and outstanding. Shares issued upon vesting may be either authorized but unissued shares or reacquired shares held by Westfield Financial.us.  Any shares not issued because vesting requirements are not met will again be available for issuance under the plans.  Shares awarded vest ratably over five years.  The fair market value of shares awarded, based on the market price at the date of grant, is recorded as unearned compensation and amortized over the applicable vesting period.  The fair value of stock awards granted in 2007 was $10.  There were no grants in 2008.


A summary of the status of unvested restricted stock awards at December 31, 20082010 is presented below:


 

Shares

 

Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair Value

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2007

582,966 

 

$    7.54

Shares vested

(117,774)

 

10.00

Balance at December 31, 2008

465,192 

 

$    6.92


Westfield Financial

  Shares  
Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair
Value
 
       
Balance at December 31, 2009  358,573  $10.00 
Shares granted  9,000   7.67 
Shares vested  (118,961)  10.00 
Balance at December 31, 2010  248,612  $9.92 
F-27

We recorded total expense for restricted stock awards of $1.2 million, $751,000,$1.3million, and $456,000$1.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, 2007,respectively.  Tax shortfalls related to equity incentive plan expense were $18,000 and 2006,$11,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2008, respectively.  A tax shortfallbenefit of $11,000$5,000 related to this expense was recognized for the year ended December 31, 2008.  Tax benefits related to equity incentive plan expense were $42,000 and $260,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.2009.  Unrecognized compensation cost for stock awards was $4.3$2.2 million at December 31, 2008,2010, with a remaining life of 3.82.0 years.


In 2007 and 2006, 559,000 and 3,2812009, 22,000 restricted stock awards were granted, having a fair value of $10.04 and $7.59$9.34 per share, respectively.share.  No restricted stock awards were granted in 2008.  Total fair value of the stock awards vested was $1.2 million, for the year ended December 31, 2008,$1.3 million and $477,000$1.2 million for the years ended December 31, 20072010, 2009 and 2006.

2008, respectively.



F-28




Employee Stock Ownership Plan -Westfield FinancialWe established an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “ESOP”)ESOP for the benefit of each employee that has reached the age of 21 and has completed at least 1,000 hours of service in the previous twelve-month period.  In January 2002, as part of the initial stock conversion, Westfield Financialwe provided a loan to the Westfield Financial Employee Stock Ownership PlanESOP Trust which was used to purchase 8%, or 1,305,359 shares, of the common stock sold in the initial public offering.


In January 2007, as part of the second step stock conversion, Westfield Financialwe provided aan additional loan to the Westfield Financial Employee Stock Ownership PlanESOP Trust which was used to purchase 4.0%, or 736,000 shares, of the 18,400,000 shares of common stock sold in the offering.  The 2002 and 2007 loans bear interest equal to 8.0% and provide for annual payments of interest and principal.


At December 31, 20082010, the remaining principal balance is payable as follows:


Years Ending
December 31,

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

2009

 

$       447

2010

 

447

2011

 

447

2012

 

447

2013

 

447

Thereafter

 

9,268

 

 

 

 

 

$  11,503

Year Ending   
December 31, Amount 
    
2011 $446,782 
2012  446,782 
2013  446,782 
2014  446,782 
2015  446,782 
Thereafter  8,375,176 
  $10,609,086 

Westfield Bank has

We have committed to make contributions to the ESOP sufficient to support the debt service of the loans.  The loans are secured by the shares purchased, which are held in a suspense account for allocation among the participants as the loans are paid.  Total compensation expense applicable to the ESOP amounted to $920,000, $973,000$747,000, $824,000, and $521,000$920,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.


Shares held by the ESOP include the following at December 31, 20082010 and 2007:

2009:


 

2008

 

2007

 

 

 

 

Allocated

361,644

 

278,861

Committed to be allocated

93,947

 

96,182

Unallocated

1,551,466

 

1,645,413

 

2,007,057

 

2,020,456

 

 

 

 


  2010  2009 
       
Allocated  504,462   437,626 
Committed to be allocated  89,039   91,493 
Unallocated  1,370,934   1,459,973 
   1,964,435   1,989,092 
F-28

Cash dividends declared and received on allocated shares are allocated to participants and charged to retained earnings.  Cash dividends declared and received on unallocated shares are held in suspense and are applied to repay the outstanding debt of the ESOP.  The fair value of unallocated shares was $16.0$12.7 million and $12.0 million at December 31, 20082010 and 2007.2009, respectively.  ESOP shares are considered outstanding for earnings per share calculations as they are committed to be allocated.  Unallocated ESOP shares are excluded from earnings per share calculations.  The value of unearned shares to be allocated to ESOP participants for future services not yet performed is reflected as a reduction of stockholders’shareholders’ equity.




F-29




10.

9.        RETIREMENT PLANS AND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS


Pension Plan - Westfield Financial providesWe provide basic and supplemental pension benefits for eligible employees through the SBERA Pension Plan (the “Plan”).  Employees must work a minimum of 1,000 hours per year to be eligible for the Plan.  Eligible employees become vested in the Plan after five years of service.


The following table provides information for the Plan at or for the years ended December 31:


 

Years Ended December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in benefit obligation:

 

 

 

 

 

Benefit obligation, beginning of year

 $  10,804 

 

 $ 10,103 

 

 $ 10,430 

Service cost

817 

 

701 

 

724 

Interest

756 

 

581 

 

600 

Actuarial loss (gain)

628 

 

(419)

 

(594)

Benefits paid

(307)

 

(162)

 

(1,057)

Benefit obligation, end of year

12,698 

 

10,804 

 

10,103 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in plan assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year

9,504 

 

8,081 

 

7,453 

Actual return (loss) on plan assets

(2,423)

 

1,049 

 

1,109 

Employer contribution

1,671 

 

536 

 

576 

Benefits paid

(307)

 

(162)

 

(1,057)

Fair value of plan assets, end of year

8,445 

 

9,504 

 

8,081 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Funded status and accrued benefit, end of year

 $    4,253 

 

 $   1,300 

 

 $   2,022 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated benefit obligation

 $    6,824 

 

 $   5,941 

 

 $   5,188 

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2010  2009  2008 
  (In thousands) 
          
Change in benefit obligation:         
Benefit obligation, beginning of year $14,057  $12,698  $10,804 
Service cost  930   862   817 
Interest  773   730   756 
Actuarial loss  1,079   26   628 
Benefits paid  (648)  (259)  (307)
Benefit obligation, end of year  16,191   14,057   12,698 
             
Change in plan assets:            
Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year  9,793   8,445   9,504 
Actual return (loss) on plan assets  1,205   1,607   (2,423)
Employer contribution  600   -   1,671 
Benefits paid  (648)  (259)  (307)
Fair value of plan assets, end of year  10,950   9,793   8,445 
             
Funded status and accrued benefit, end of year $5,241  $4,264  $4,253 
             
Accumulated benefit obligation, end of year $9,842  $7,579  $6,824 

The following actuarial assumptions were used in determining the pension benefit obligation for the years ended December 31:


 

December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discount rate

       5.75

 %

 

       6.00

%

Rate of compensation increase

       5.00

 

 

       5.00

 


     
  2010 2009
       
Discount rate  5.50%  5.50%
Rate of compensation increase  5.00   5.00 
F-29

Net pension cost includes the following components for the years ended December 31:


 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service cost

$      817 

 

$      701 

 

$      724 

 

Interest Cost

756 

 

581 

 

600 

 

Expected return on assets

(887)

 

(646)

 

(596)

 

Actuarial (gain) loss

(13)

 

(1)

 

43 

 

Transition obligation

(45)

 

(12)

 

(12)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net periodic pension cost

$      628 

 

$      623 

 

$      759 

 

  2010  2009  2008 
  (In thousands) 
          
Service cost $930  $862  $817 
Interest cost  773   730   756 
Expected return on assets  (783)  (676)  (887)
Actuarial loss (gain)  91   137   (45)
Transition asset amortization  (12)  (12)  (13)
             
Net periodic pension cost $999  $1,041  $628 



F-30




The following actuarial assumptions were used in determining the service costs for the years ended December 31:


 

Years Ended December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

Weighted average assumptions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discount rate

6.00

%

 

5.75

%

 

5.75

%

Expected return on plan assets

8.00

 

 

8.00

 

 

8.00

 

Rate of compensation increase

5.00

 

 

5.00

 

 

5.00

 

  Years Ended December 31,
  2010 2009 2008
          
Discount rate  5.50%  5.75%  6.00%
Expected return on plan assets  8.00   8.00   8.00 
Rate of compensation increase  5.00   5.00   5.00 

The expected long term rate of return on plan assets is based on prevailing yields of high quality fixed income investments increased by a premium of 3.00% to 5.00% for equity investments.  We have not yet determined what we expect to contribute to our pension plan in 2011.


The fair value of major categories of our pension plan assets are summarized below:

  December 31, 2010 
Plan Assets Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Fair Value 
  (In thousands) 
             
Collective funds $3,004  $2,043  $-  $5,047 
Equity securities  3,038   -   -   3,038 
Mutual funds  1,608   -   -   1,608 
Hedge funds  -   -   786   786 
Short-term investments  -   471   -   471 
  $7,650  $2,514  $786  $10,950 

  December 31, 2009 
  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Fair Value 
  (In thousands) 
             
Collective funds $2,400  $1,633  $-  $4,033 
Equity securities  2,522   -   -   2,522 
Mutual funds  1,419   -   -   1,419 
Hedge funds  -   -   756   756 
Short-term investments  -   1,063   -   1,063 
  $6,341  $2,696  $756  $9,793 
F-30

The plan assets measured at fair value in Level 1 are based on quoted market prices in an active exchange market. Plan assets measured at fair value in Level 2 are based on pricing models that consider standard input factors such as observable market data, benchmark yields, interest rate volatilities, broker/dealer quotes, credit spreads and new issue data.  Plan assets measured at fair value in Level 3 are based on unobservable inputs, which include assumptions and the best information under the circumstance.

The asset or liability fair value measurement level within fair value hierarchy is based on prevailing yieldsthe lowest level of high quality fixed incomeany input that is significant to the fair value measurement.  Valuation techniques used need to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.  The Plan reports bonds and other obligations, short-term investments increasedand equity securities at fair value based on published quotations.  Collective funds and hedge funds (“Funds”) are valued in accordance with valuations provided by such Funds, which generally value marketable equity securities at the last reported sales price on the valuation date and other investments at fair value, as determined by each Fund’s manager.

The preceding methods described may produce a premiumfair value calculation that may not be indicative of 3%net realizable value or reflective of future values.  Furthermore, although the Plan believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies to 5%determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date.

The following is a reconciliation of Level 3 investments for equity investments.  Westfield Financial expectswhich significant unobservable inputs were used to contribute $466,000 todetermine fair value:

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2010  2009 
  (In thousands) 
Balance at beginning of year $756  $659 
         
Unrealized appreciation  30   97 
         
Balance at end of year $786  $756 

The defined benefit plan offers a common and collective trust as the underlying investment structure for its retirement structure for the pension plan in 2009.



Westfield Financial’s pension plan asset allocation at December 31, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:


 

Percentage of Plan Assets
At December 31,

Asset Category

2008

 

2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Bonds

22.7

%

 

17.2

%

Total Equity

43.7

 

 

61.3

 

Total Other

28.0

 

 

19.2

 

Total Money Market

5.6

 

 

2.3

 

 

100.0

%

 

100.0

%


plan.  The target allocation mix for the pension plan for 20082010 was an equity-based investment deployment range from 40% to 64% of total portfolio assets.  The remainder of the portfolio is allocated to fixed income from 15% to 25% and other investments including global asset allocation and hedge funds from 20% to 30%36%.

  The investment objective is to diversify investments across a spectrum of investment types to limit risks from large market swings.


Trustees of SBERAthe Plan select investment managers for the portfolio and a special investment advisory firm is retained to provide allocation analysis.  The overall investment objective is to diversify equity investments across a spectrum of types, small cap, large cap and international, along with investment styles such as growth and value.


Westfield Financial estimates

We estimate that the benefits to be paid from the pension plan for years ended December 31 are as follows:


Year

Benefit Payments to Participants

 

(In Thousands)

2009

 

 

$       46

 

 

2010

 

 

676

 

 

2011

 

 

820

 

 

2012

 

 

320

 

 

2012

 

 

959

 

 

In Aggregate for 2014 - 2017

 

 

2,707

 

 

 

 

 

$  5,528

 

 




Year Benefit Payments to Participants
  (In thousands)
    
2011  1,801 
2012   710 
2013   237 
2014   963 
2015   504 
In aggregate for 2016 – 2020   3,265 
   7,480 
F-31





Postretirement Benefits - Westfield FinancialWe provided postretirement life insurance benefits to employees based on the employee’s salary at time of retirement.  As of December 31, 20082010 and 2007,2009, the accrued liability recorded in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheetsheets amounted to $399,000$393,000 and $335,000,$407,000, respectively.  Total expense associated with this plan amounted to $25,000, $19,000 and $88,000$26,000 for each of the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007,2010 and 2006, respectively.


In 2007, Westfield Financial curtailed its postretirement life insurance benefits2009, and $25,000 for active employee to offset rising compensation costs.  The curtailment resulted in a pre-tax gain of $315,000.

the year ended December 31, 2008.


Supplemental Retirement Benefits- Westfield Financial providesWe provide supplemental retirement benefits to certain key officers.  At December 31, 20082010 and 2007, Westfield Financial2009, we had accrued $2.6 million$102,000 and $2.4 million,$183,000, respectively, relating to these benefits.  Amounts charged to expense were $347,000, $350,000,$12,000, $127,000, and $270,000$347,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.


401(k)- Employees are eligible to participate in a 401(k) plan.  Westfield Financial makesWe make a matching contribution of 50% with respect to the first 6% of each participant’s annual earnings contributed to the plan.  Westfield Financial’sOur contributions to the plan were $169,000, $161,000$184,000, $171,000 and $149,000,$169,000, for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.


11.

10.      REGULATORY CAPITAL


Westfield

The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the Office of Thrift Supervision.OTS.  Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on Westfield Bank’sour consolidated financial statements.  Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, Westfieldthe Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices.  The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.  Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable to savings and loan holding companies.


Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require Westfield Financial and Westfield Bankus to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), Tier 1 capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined) and of tangible capital (as defined) to tangible assets (as defined).  Management believes,We believe, as of December 31, 20082010 and 2007,2009, that Westfield Financial and Westfield Bankwe met all capital adequacy requirements to which theywe are subject.


As of December 31, 2008,2010, the most recent notification from the Office of Thrift SupervisionOTS categorized Westfieldthe Bank as “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.  To be categorized as “well capitalized” Westfieldthe Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk based and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the following table.  There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed Westfieldthe Bank’s category.  Westfield Financial’s and Westfield Bank’sOur actual capital ratios as of December 31, 20082010 and 20072009 are also presented in the table.



F-32





 

Actual

 

Minimum for Capital
Adequacy Purposes

 

Minimum To Be Well
Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective
Action Provisions

 

Amount

 

Ratio

 

Amount

 

Ratio

 

Amount

 

Ratio

 

(Dollars in thousands)

December 31, 2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Capital(to Risk Weighted Assets):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

$  276,857

 

42.56

%

 

$  52,042

 

8.00

%

 

N/A

 

-

 

Bank

226,314

 

35.55

 

 

50,930

 

8.00

 

 

$  63,662

 

10.00

%

Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

268,725

 

41.31

 

 

26,021

 

4.00

 

 

N/A

 

-

 

Bank

219,744

 

34.52

 

 

25,465

 

4.00

 

 

38,197

 

6.00

 

Tier 1 Capital (to Adjusted Total Assets):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

268,725

 

23.97

 

 

44,836

 

4.00

 

 

N/A

 

-

 

Bank

219,744

 

20.51

 

 

42,854

 

4.00

 

 

53,567

 

5.00

 

Tangible Equity (to Tangible Assets):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

N/A

 

-

 

 

N/A

 

-

 

 

N/A

 

-

 

Bank

219,744

 

20.51

 

 

16,070

 

1.50

 

 

N/A

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Capital(to Risk Weighted Assets):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

$  290,900

 

50.29

%

 

$  46,276

 

8.00

%

 

N/A

 

-

 

Bank

218,118

 

38.76

 

 

45,021

 

8.00

 

 

$  56,277

 

10.00

%

Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

285,174

 

49.30

 

 

23,138

 

4.00

 

 

N/A

 

-

 

Bank

212,392

 

37.74

 

 

22,511

 

4.00

 

 

33,766

 

6.00

 

Tier 1 Capital (to Adjusted Total Assets):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

285,174

 

27.48

 

 

41,506

 

4.00

 

 

N/A

 

-

 

Bank

212,392

 

21.95

 

 

38,696

 

4.00

 

 

48,370

 

5.00

 

Tangible Equity (to Tangible Assets):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

N/A

 

-

 

 

N/A

 

-

 

 

N/A

 

-

 

Bank

212,392

 

21.95

 

 

14,511

 

1.50

 

 

N/A

 

-

 



  Actual  
Minimum for Capital
Adequacy Purposes
  
Minimum To Be Well
Capitalized Under Prompt
Corrective Action
Provisions
 
  Amount  Ratio  Amount  Ratio  Amount  Ratio 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
December 31, 2010                  
                   
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets):
                  
Consolidated $231,272   34.05% $54,339   8.00%  N/A   - 
Bank  221,643   32.69   54,238   8.00  $67,797   10.00%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets):
                        
Consolidated  224,338   33.03   27,169   4.00   N/A   - 
Bank  214,668   31.66   27,119   4.00   40,678   6.00 
Tier 1 Capital (to Adjusted Total Assets):
                        
Consolidated  224,338   18.07   49,662   4.00   N/A   - 
Bank  214,668   17.37   49,434   4.00   61,793   5.00 
Tangible Equity (to Tangible Assets):
                        
Consolidated  N/A   -   N/A   -   N/A   - 
Bank  214,668   17.37   24,717   2.00   N/A   - 
                         
December 31, 2009                        
                         
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets):
                        
Consolidated $257,209   38.07% $54,052   8.00%  N/A     
Bank  236,940   35.29   53,706   8.00  $67,132   10.00%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets):
                        
Consolidated  249,564   36.94   27,026   4.00   N/A   - 
Bank  230,109   34.28   26,853   4.00   40,279   6.00 
Tier 1 Capital (to Adjusted Total Assets):
                        
Consolidated  249,564   20.92   47,713   4.00   N/A   - 
Bank  230,109   19.56   47,059   4.00   58,824   5.00 
Tangible Equity (to Tangible Assets):
                        
Consolidated  N/A   -   N/A   -   N/A   - 
Bank  230,109   19.56   23,530   2.00   N/A   - 
The following is a reconciliation of our GAAP capital to regulatory Tier 1 and total capital:
  December 31, 
  2010  2009 
  (In thousands) 
Consolidated GAAP capital $221,245  $247,299 
Unrealized losses on certain available for sale        
securities, net of tax  3,774   913 
Unrealized losses on defined benefit pension plan  1,742   1,352 
Disallowed deferred tax asset  (2,423)  - 
Tier 1 capital  224,338   249,564 
         
Plus: allowance for loan losses  6,934   7,645 
         
Total regulatory capital $231,272  $257,209 
F-33

In January 2008, Westfield Financialwe announced that the Board of Directors had approved a share repurchase program (the “Repurchase Program”) which authorized the repurchase of up to 3,194,000 shares or ten percent of itsour outstanding shares of common stock, continuing until its completion.stock.  This program was completed during the second quarter of 2010.  On May 25, 2010 the Board of Directors voted to authorize the commencement of a second repurchase program, authorizing the repurchase of an additional 2,924,367 shares, or ten percent of our outstanding shares of common stock.  At December 31, 2008, Westfield Financial2010, we had 2,154,9791,552,516 shares remaining to be purchased under this program.




F-33




Westfield Financial and Westfield Bank

We are subject to dividend restrictions imposed by various regulators, including a limitation on the total of all dividends that Westfieldthe Bank may pay to Westfield Financialus in any calendar year, to an amount that shall not exceed Westfieldthe Bank’s net income for the current year, plus Westfield Bank’sits net income retained for the two previous years, without regulatory approval.  In addition, Westfieldthe Bank may not declare or pay dividends on, and Westfield Financialwe may not repurchase, any of itsour shares of common stock if the effect thereof would cause stockholders’shareholders’ equity to be reduced below applicable regulatory capital maintenance requirements or if such declaration, payment or repurchase would otherwise violate regulatory requirements.  At December 31, 20082010 and 2007, Westfield2009, the Bank’s retained earnings available for payment of dividends was $20.4$1.9 million and $1 9.2$12.3 million, respectively.  Accordingly, $52.0$54.3 million and $46.3$54.1 million of Westfield Financial’sour equity in the net assets of Westfieldthe Bank werewas restricted at December 31, 20082010 and 2007,2009, respectively.


The only funds available for the payment of dividends on theour capital stock of Westfield Financial will be cash and cash equivalents held by Westfield Financial,us, dividends paid from Westfieldthe Bank to Westfield Financial,us, and borrowings.  WestfieldThe Bank will be prohibited from paying cash dividends to Westfield Financialus to the extent that any such payment would reduce Westfieldthe Bank’s capital below required capital levels.


The following is a reconciliation of Westfield Financial’s GAAP capital to regulatory Tier 1 and total capital:


 

December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

Consolidated GAAP capital

$    259,919

 

$    286,532 

Unrealized losses (gains) on certain available-for-sale
  securities, net of tax

6,779

 

(804)

Unrealized losses (gains) on defined benefit pension plan

2,027

 

(554)

Tier 1 Capital

268,725

 

285,174 

 

 

 

 

Plus: Allowance for loan losses

8,132

 

5,726 

 

 

 

 

Total Regulatory Capital

$    276,857

 

$    290,900 


12.

11.      INCOME TAXES


Income taxes consist of the following:


 

Years Ended December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current tax provision:

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

$    2,774 

 

$    3,612 

 

$    1,631 

State

119 

 

384 

 

148 

Total

2,893 

 

3,996 

 

1,779 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax (benefit) provision:

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

(1,153)

 

(136)

 

(257)

State

55 

 

(48)

 

Total

(1,098)

 

(184)

 

(256)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

$    1,795 

 

$    3,812 

 

$    1,523 




F-34




  Years Ended December 31, 
  2010  2009  2008 
     (In thousands)    
          
Current tax provision:         
    Federal $302  $1,213  $2,774 
    State  121   166   119 
Total  423   1,379   2,893 
             
Deferred tax (benefit) provision:            
    Federal  (387)  (108)  (1,153)
    State  (2)  (4)  55 
Total  (389)  (112)  (1,098)
             
Total $34  $1,267  $1,795 
The reasons for the differences between the statutory federal income tax rate and the effective rates are summarized below:


 

Years Ended December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statutory federal income tax rate

34.0 

%

 

34.0 

%

 

34.0 

%

Increase (decrease) resulting from:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

State taxes, net of federal tax benefit

1.3 

 

 

1.8 

 

 

1.6 

 

Tax exempt income

(5.8)

 

 

(4.0)

 

 

(8.0)

 

Bank-owned life insurance

(5.7)

 

 

(3.6)

 

 

(4.7)

 

Dividends received deduction

(0.1)

 

 

(0.1)

 

 

(0.2)

 

Other, net

(2.5)

 

 

2.4 

 

 

2.0 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effective tax rate

21.2 

%

 

30.5 

%

 

24.7 

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


  Years Ended December 31, 
  2010  2009  2008 
          
Statutory federal income tax rate  34.0%  34.0%  34.0%
Increase (decrease) resulting from:            
     State taxes, net of federal tax benefit  2.6   1.6   1.3 
     Tax exempt income  (17.0)  (7.1)  (5.8)
     Bank-owned life insurance  (17.0)  (7.7)  (5.7)
     Dividends received deduction  -   -   (0.1)
     Other, net  (1.5)  (2.0)  (2.5)
             
Effective tax rate  1.1%  18.8%  21.2%
F-34

Cash paid for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 2007,was $177,000, $1.8 million, and 2006 was $3.4 million, $3.8 million, and $1.8 million, respectively.


The tax effects of each item that gives rise to deferred taxes included in other assets, are as follows:


 

December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

(In thousands)

 

 

Net unrealized loss (gain) on securities available for sale

$      4,032

 

$      (286)

Defined benefit plan

1,043

 

(286)

Allowance for loan losses

2,991

 

1,947 

Employee benefit and stock-based compensation plans

2,060

 

2,007 

Other

395

 

394 

 

 

 

 

Net deferred tax asset

$    10,521

 

$    3,776 


A summary

  December 31, 
  2010  2009 
  (In thousands) 
       
Net unrealized loss on securities available for sale $1,968  $742 
Defined benefit plan  896   695 
Allowance for loan losses  2,357   2,599 
Employee benefit and share-based compensation plans  2,327   2,094 
Other-than-temporary impairment write-down  581   531 
Other  682   334 
         
Net deferred tax asset $8,811  $6,995 
The federal income tax reserve for loan losses at the Bank’s base year is $5.8 million.  If any portion of the changereserve is used for purposes other than to absorb loan losses, approximately 150% of the amount actually used, limited to the amount of the reserve, would be subject to taxation in the netfiscal year in which used.  As the Bank intends to use the reserve solely to absorb loan losses, a deferred tax asset is as follows:

liability of $2.4 million has not been provided.

Our income tax returns are subject to review and examination by federal and state tax authorities.  We are currently open to audit under the applicable statutes of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service for the years ended December 31, 2007 through 2009.  The years open to examination by state taxing authorities vary by jurisdiction; however, no years prior to 2007 are open.

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

(In thousands)

 

 

Balance at beginning of year

$    3,776

 

$    4,595 

 

$    4,583 

Deferred tax benefit

1,098

 

184 

 

256 

Net unrealized loss (gain) on securities
  available for sale

4,318

 

(757)

 

(204)

Defined benefit plan

1,329

 

(246)

 

(40)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at end of year

$    10,521

 

$    3,776 

 

$    4,595 





F-35




13.

12.      TRANSACTIONS WITH DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


Westfield Financial has

We have had, and expectsexpect to have in the future, loans with itsour directors and executive officers.  Such loans, in theour opinion of management do not include more than the normal risk of collectability or other unfavorable features.  Following is a summary of activity for such loans:


 

Years Ended December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 Balance, beginning of year

$  12,893 

 

$  13,415 

 Principal distributions

7,457 

 

3,913 

 Repayments of principal

(4,811)

 

(4,435)

 

 

 

 

 Balance, end of year

$  15,539 

 

$  12,893 


14.

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2010  2009 
  (In thousands) 
       
 Balance, beginning of year $17,626  $15,539 
 Principal distributions  187   4,061 
 Repayments of principal  (2,503)  (1,974)
 Balance, end of year $15,310  $17,626 
F-35

13.      COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES


In the normal course of business, various commitments and contingent liabilities are outstanding, such as standby letters of credit and commitments to extend credit with off-balance-sheet risk that are not reflected in the consolidated financial statements.  Financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk involve elements of credit, interest rate, liquidity and market risk.


Management does

We do not anticipate any significant losses as a result of these transactions.  The following summarizes these financial instruments and other commitments and contingent liabilities at their contract amounts:


 

December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

(In thousands)

Commitments to extend credit:

 

 

 

Unused lines of credit

$  69,222

 

$  61,975

Loan commitments

16,826

 

19,163

Existing construction loan agreements

1,079

 

8,419

Standby letters of credit

5,946

 

7,364


Westfield Financial uses

  December 31, 
  2010  2009 
  (In thousands) 
Commitments to extend credit:      
Unused lines of credit $80,378  $78,173 
Loan commitments  6,637   13,482 
Existing construction loan agreements  217   882 
Standby letters of credit  3,032   3,745 
We use the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on balance sheet instruments.


Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract.  Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee.  Since some commitments expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.  Westfield Financial evaluatesWe evaluate each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis.  The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by Westfield Financialus upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty.  Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, and income-producing commercial properties.



F-36




Standby letters of credit are written conditional commitments issued by Westfield Financialus that guaranteesguarantee the performance of a customer to a third party.  Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements.  The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.


At December 31, 20082010, outstanding commitments to extend credit totaled $93.1$90.3 million, with $9.2$5.6 million in fixed rate commitments with interest rates ranging from 6.00%4.25% to 12.00% and $83.9$84.7 million in variable rate commitments.  At December 31, 2007,2009, outstanding commitments to extend credit totaled $96.9$96.3 million, with $13.3$9.6 million in fixed rate commitments with interest rates ranging from 5.25%4.25% to 12.00% and $83.6$86.7 million in variable rate commitments.


In the ordinary course of business, Westfield Financial iswe are party to various legal proceedings, none of which, in theour opinion, of management, will have a material effect on Westfield Financial’sour consolidated financial position or results of operations.


Westfield Financial leases

We lease facilities and certain equipment under cancelable and noncancelable leases expiring in various years through the year 2046.  Certain of the leases provide for renewal periods for up to forty years at the discretion of Westfield Financial.our discretion.  Rent expense under operating leases was $401,000, $363,000,$523,000, $481,000, and $246,000$401,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.


F-36

Aggregate future minimum rental payments under the terms of thenon-cancelable operating leases at December 31, 2007,2010, are as follows:


Years Ending

(In thousands)

 

 

2009

$           524

2010

509

2011

505

2012

409

2013

400

Thereafter

10,667

 

$      13,014

Year Ending
December 31,
 Amount 
  (In thousands) 
    
2011 $565 
2012  473 
2013  466 
2014  463 
2015  435 
Thereafter  10,137 
  $12,539 

15.

Employment and change of control agreements
We have entered into employment and change of control agreements with certain senior officers. The initial term of the employment agreements is for three years subject to separate one-year extensions as approved by the Board of Directors at the end of each applicable fiscal year. Each employment agreement provides for minimum annual salaries, discretionary cash bonuses and other fringe benefits as well as severance benefits upon certain terminations of employment that are not for cause. The change of control agreements expire one year following a notice of non-extension and only provide for severance benefits upon certain terminations of employment that are not for cause and that are related to a change of control of the Company or the Bank.
14.      CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK


Most of Westfield Financial’sour loans consist of residential and commercial real estate loans located in Western Massachusetts.  As of December 31, 20072010 and 2006, Westfield Financial’s2009, our residential and commercial related real estate loans represented 60%72.8% and 68.9% of total loans.  Westfield Financial’sloans, respectively.  Our policy for collateral requires that the amount of the loan may not exceed 100% and 85% of the appraised value of the property for residential and commercial real estate, respectively, at the date the loan is granted.  For residential loans, in cases where the loan exceeds 80%, private mortgage insurance is typically obtained for that portion of the loan in excess of 80% of the appraised value of the property.



F-37




16.

15.      FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

ASSETS AND LIABLITIES


Determination of Fair Value


Westfield Financial uses

We use fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. In accordance with SFAS No. 157, theThe fair value of a financial instrument is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for Westfield Financial’sour various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.


Fair Value Hierarchy


In accordance with SFAS No. 157, Westfield Financial groups its financial assets and financial liabilities generally measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value.


Level 1 – Valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 assets and liabilities generally include debt and equity securities that are traded in an active exchange market. Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.


Level 2 – Valuation is based on observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. For example, Level 2 assets and liabilities may include debt securities with quoted prices that are traded less frequently than exchange-traded instruments or mortgage loans held for sale, for which the fair value is based on what the securitization market is currently offering for mortgage loans with similar characteristics.


Level 3 – Valuation is based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation. This category generally includes certain asset-backed securities, certain private equity investments, residential mortgage servicing rights, and long-term derivative contracts.


Methods and assumptions for valuing Westfield Financial’sour financial instruments are set forth below for financial instruments that have fair values different than their carrying values.below.  Estimated fair values are calculated based on the value without regard to any premium or discount that may result from concentrations of ownership of a financial instrument, possible tax ramifications or estimated transaction cost.



F-38




Cash and cash equivalents - The The carrying amounts of cash and short-term instruments approximate fair values based on the short-term nature of the assets.


Interest-bearing deposits in banks - The carrying amounts of interest-bearing deposits maturing within ninety days approximate their fair values. Fair values of other interest-bearing deposits are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on current market rates for similar types of deposits.


F-37

Securities and mortgage-backed securities - The securities measured at fair value in Level 1 are based on quoted market prices in an active exchange market. These securities include marketable equity securities.  All other securities are measured at fair value in Level 2 and are based on pricing models that consider standard input factors such as observable market data, benchmark yields, interest rate volatilities, broker/dealer quotes, credit spreads and new issue data.

These securities include government sponsored enterprise obligations, state and municipal obligations, residential mortgage-backed securities guaranteed and sponsored by the U.S. government or an agency thereof, and private label residential mortgage-backed securities.  At December 31, 2010, all fair value measurements are obtained from a third-party pricing service and are not adjusted by management.


Federal Home Loan Bank and other stock- These investments are carried at cost which is their estimated redemption value.


Loans receivable - For variable-rateadjustable rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. Fair values for certain mortgage loans (e.g., one-to-four family residential), credit card loans, and other consumer loans are based on quoted market prices of similar loans sold in conjunction with securitization transactions, adjusted for differences in loan characteristics.  Fair values for other loans (e.g., commercial real estate and investment property mortgage loans, commercial and industrial loans) are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using market interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. Fair values for non-performing loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses or underlying collateral values, where applicable.


Accrued interest -The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair value.


Deposit liabilities -The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g., interest and non-interest checking, passbook savings, and certain types of money market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). The carrying amounts of variable-rate, fixed-term money market accounts and certificates of deposit approximate their fair values at the reporting date. Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies market interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.


Short-term borrowings - For short-term borrowings maturing within ninety days, carrying values approximate fair values. Fair

Long-term debt - The fair values of other short-term borrowings areour long-term debt is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the current incremental borrowing rates in the market for similar types of borrowing arrangements.


Long-term debt - The fair values of Westfield Financial’s long-term debt are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the current incremental borrowing rates in the market for similar types of borrowing arrangements.


Commitments to extend credit - The stated value of commitments to extend credit approximates fair value as the current interest rates for similar commitments do not differ significantly.  For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates.  Such differences are not considered significant.



F-39




Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis


Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:


 

December 31, 2008

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Securities available for sale

$  6,127

 

$    18,269

 

$      -

 

$    24,396

Mortgage-backed securities available

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

for sale

-

 

233,747

 

-

 

233,747

Total assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$  6,127

 

$  252,016

 

$      -

 

$  258,143

  December 31, 2010 
  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 
Securities available for sale: (In thousands) 
Mutual funds $5,272  $1,641  $-  $6,913 
Common and preferred stock  47   -   -   47 
Government-sponsored enterprise obligations  -��  17,864   -   17,864 
State and municipal bonds  -   43,077   -   43,077 
Government sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities  -   380,984   -   380,984 
U.S. government guaranteed residential mortgage-backed securities  -   187,676   -   187,676 
Private label residential mortgage-backed securities  -   7,578   -   7,578 
Total assets $5,319  $638,820  $-  $644,139 
F-38

   December 31, 2009
  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 
  (In thousands)
Securities available for sale:            
Mutual funds $5,037  $1,452  $-  $6,489 
Common and preferred stock  59   -   -   59 
Government-sponsored enterprise obligations  -   10,698   -   10,698 
State and municipal  -   2,070   -   2,070 
Government-sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities  -   290,248   -   290,248 
U.S. government guaranteed residential mortgage-backed securities  -   1,047   -   1,047 
Private-label residential mortgage-backed  -   8,510   -   8,510 
Total assets $5,096  $314,025  $-  $319,121 
There were no transfers to or from Level 1 and 2 for assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the year ended December 31, 2010.

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis


Westfield Financial

We may also be required, from time to time, to measure certain other financial assets on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. These adjustments to fair value usually result from application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets. The following table summarizes the fair value hierarchy used to determine each adjustment and the carrying value of the related individual assets as of December 31, 2008.

2010 and 2009.


 

At December 31, 2008

 

Year Ended
December 31,
2008

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Gains (Losses)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impaired loans

 $            -

 

 $            -

 

 $     4,809

 

 $           (2,286)

Total assets

 $            -

 

 $            -

 

 $     4,809

 

 $           (2,286)

  At  Year Ended 
  December 31, 2010  December 31, 2010 
           Total 
  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Gains (Losses) 
  (In thousands)    
Impaired loans $-  $-  $1,661  $(714)
Other real estate owned  -   -   223   (157)
Total assets $-  $-  $1,884  $(871)
                 
                 
  At  Year Ended 
  December 31, 2009  December 31, 2009 
              Total 
  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Gains (Losses) 
  (In thousands)     
Impaired loans $-  $-  $3,575  $(875)
Total assets $-  $-  $3,575  $(875)
F-39

The amount of loans represents the carrying value and related write-down and valuation allowance of impaired loans for which adjustments are based on the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral.  The fair value of impaired loans with specific allocations of the allowance for loan losses is generally based on real estate appraisals performed by independent licensed or certified appraisers.  These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach.  Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available.  Management will discount appraisals as deemed necessary based on the date of the appraisal and new information deemed relevant to the valuation.  Such adjustments are typically significant and result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value. The resulting losses were recognized in earnings through the provision for loan losses.

Westfield Financial does

The amount of other real estate owned represents the carrying value of the collateral based on the appraised value of the underlying collateral using the market approach less selling costs.

We do not measure any liabilities at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis on the consolidated balance sheets.


Summary of Fair Values of Financial Instruments

F-40




The estimated fair values of the Westfield Financial’sour financial instruments at December 31 are as follows:


 

2008

 

2007

 

Carrying

 

Estimated

 

Carrying

 

Estimated

 

Value

 

Fair Value

 

Value

 

Fair Value

 

(In thousands)

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

$    56,533

 

$    56,533

 

$    37,623

 

$    37,623

Securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available for sale

24,396

 

24,396

 

38,051

 

38,051

Held to maturity

79,303

 

82,491

 

104,025

 

105,829

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage backed securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available for sale

233,747

 

233,747

 

206,178

 

206,178

Held to maturity

168,332

 

168,716

 

174,594

 

174,550

Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and other stock

8,456

 

8,456

 

7,510

 

7,510

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans - net

472,135

 

492,121

 

414,902

 

432,901

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued interest receivable

5,261

 

5,261

 

5,761

 

5,761

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits

588,029

 

591,244

 

602,676

 

603,780

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term borrowings

49,824

 

49,824

 

35,268

 

35,268

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt

173,300

 

177,567

 

105,000

 

106,063

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued interest payable

762

 

762

 

602

 

602


  2010  2009 
  Carrying  Estimated  Carrying  Estimated 
  Value  Fair Value  Value  Fair Value 
  (In thousands) 
Assets:            
Cash and cash equivalents $11,611  $11,611  $28,719  $28,719 
Securities:                
Available for sale  644,139   644,139   319,121   319,121 
Held to maturity  -   -   295,011   303,619 
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston                
and other restricted stock  12,251   12,251   10,339   10,339 
Loans - net  502,392   505,791   469,149   474,554 
Accrued interest receivable  4,279   4,279   5,198   5,198 
                 
Liabilities:                
Deposits  700,335   697,815   647,975   649,473 
Short-term borrowings  62,937   62,936   74,499   74,499 
Long-term debt  238,151   243,800   213,845   214,669 
Accrued interest payable  720   720   730   730 
Limitations - Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument.  These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time Westfield Financial’sour entire holdings of a particular financial instrument.  Where quoted market prices are not available, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors.  These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment.  Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.


17.

F-40

16.      SEGMENT INFORMATION


Westfield Financial has

We have one reportable segment, “Community Banking.”  All of Westfield Financial’sour activities are interrelated, and each activity is dependent and assessed based on how each of the activities of Westfield Financial supports the others.  For example, commercial lending is dependent upon the ability of Westfieldthe Bank to fund itself with retail deposits and other borrowings and to manage interest rate and credit risk.  This situation is also similar for consumer and residential mortgage lending.  Accordingly, all significant operating decisions are based upon our analysis of Westfield Financial as one operating segment or unit.


Westfield Financial operates

We operate only in the U.S. domestic market, primarily in Western Massachusetts.  For the years ended December 31, 2008, 20072010, 2009 and 20062008, there is no customer that accounted for more than 10% of Westfield Financial’sour revenue.




F-41




18.

17.      CONDENSED PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


The condensed balance sheets of the Westfield Financial parent company are as follows:


 

December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

(In thousands)

ASSETS:

 

 

 

Due from banks

$         2,700

 

$         2,691

Federal funds sold

10,518

 

10,979

Securities held to maturity

6,885

 

6,885

Securities available for sale

-

 

10,163

Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity

9,937

 

11,964

Mortgage-backed securities available for sale

13,503

 

27,331

Investment in subsidiaries

212,277

 

213,574

Other assets

4,227

 

3,072

TOTAL ASSETS

260,047

 

286,659

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY:

 

 

 

Liabilities

128

 

127

Equity

259,919

 

286,532

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

$     260,047

 

$     286,659


  December 31, 
  2010  2009 
  (In thousands) 
ASSETS:      
Due from banks $1,236  $5,237 
Federal funds sold  3   - 
Securities held to maturity  -   1,917 
Securities available for sale  4,544   8,130 
Investment in subsidiaries  210,886   227,680 
Other assets  4,633   4,371 
TOTAL ASSETS  221,302   247,335 
         
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY:        
Liabilities  57   36 
Equity  221,245   247,299 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY $221,302  $247,335 
F-41

The condensed statements of income for the Westfield Financial parent company are as follows:


 

Years Ended December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME:

 

 

 

 

 

Securities

 $     2,231 

 

 $     2,605 

 

 $        248 

Federal funds sold

           290 

 

        1,559 

 

             40 

Gain on sale of securities, net

           303 

 

               - 

 

               - 

Other income

              9 

 

              9 

 

              6 

Total interest income

        2,833 

 

        4,173 

 

           294 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NONINTEREST EXPENSE:

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries and employee benefits

        2,857 

 

        2,200 

 

        1,331 

Other

           491 

 

           493 

 

           160 

Total noninterest expense

        3,348 

 

        2,693 

 

        1,491 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE EQUITY IN UNDISTRIBUTED

 

 

 

 

 

INCOME OF SUBSIDIARIES AND INCOME TAXES

          (515)

 

        1,480 

 

       (1,197)

 

 

 

 

 

 

EQUITY IN UNDISTRIBUTED INCOME OF

 

 

 

 

 

SUBSIDIARIES

        7,144 

 

        7,882 

 

        5,434 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INCOME TAX PROVISION (BENEFIT)

            (62)

 

           662 

 

          (417)

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET INCOME

 $     6,691 

 

 $     8,700 

 

 $     4,654 





  Years Ended December 31, 
  2010  2009  2008 
  (In thousands) 
INCOME (LOSS):         
Dividends from subsidiaries $19,500  $9,078  $- 
Interest income from securities  247   1,499   2,231 
Interest income from federal funds sold  -   4   290 
(Loss) gain on sale of securities, net  (22)  (2,079)  303 
Other income  2   6   9 
Total income  19,727   8,508   2,833 
             
OPERATING EXPENSE:            
Salaries and employee benefits  2,710   3,100   2,857 
Other  426   470   491 
Total operating expense  3,136   3,570   3,348 
             
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE EQUITY IN UNDISTRIBUTED            
INCOME OF SUBSIDIARIES AND INCOME TAXES  16,591   4,938   (515)
             
EQUITY IN UNDISTRIBUTED (LOSS) INCOME OF            
SUBSIDIARIES  (13,600)  (767)  7,144 
             
NET INCOME BEFORE TAXES  2,991   4,171   6,629 
             
INCOME TAX BENEFIT  (15)  (1,288)  (62)
             
NET INCOME $3,006  $5,459  $6,691 
F-42





The condensed statements of cash flows of the Westfield Financial parent company are as follows:


 

 Years Ended December 31,

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

 (In thousands)

OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

Net Income

 $    6,691 

 

 $    8,700 

 

 $    4,654 

Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries

     (7,144)

 

     (7,882)

 

     (5,434)

Net amortization of premiums and discounts on securities

           10 

 

           21 

 

           12 

Net realized securities gains

        (303)

 

             - 

 

             - 

Change in other liabilities

             1 

 

           55 

 

          (42)

Change in other assets

         414 

 

     (1,565)

 

        (535)

Net transfers from subsidiaries

             - 

 

             - 

 

         236 

Other, net

      2,327 

 

      2,780 

 

      2,074 

 

 

 

 

 

 

        Net cash provided by operating activities

      1,996 

 

      2,109 

 

         965 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase of securities

             - 

 

    (58,179)

 

             - 

Proceeds from principal collections

      5,331 

 

      4,395 

 

         530 

Transfer of stock offering proceeds to subsidiaries

             - 

 

    (90,797)

 

             - 

Sale of securities

     18,414 

 

             - 

 

             - 

 

 

 

 

 

 

        Net cash provided (used) by investing activities

     23,745 

 

  (144,581)

 

         530 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash dividends paid

    (17,945)

 

    (12,075)

 

     (3,785)

Purchase of common stock for equity incentive plan

             - 

 

     (6,075)

 

             - 

Capital contribution pursuant to dissolution of MHC

             - 

 

      2,713 

 

             - 

Common stock repurchased

    (10,483)

 

             - 

 

     (1,583)

Net proceeds from sale of common stock

             - 

 

             - 

 

   171,712 

Exchange of common stock pursuant to reorganization

             - 

 

        (320)

 

             - 

Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation

         334 

 

         222 

 

         260 

Issuance of common stock in connection with stock

 

 

 

 

 

option exercises

      1,901 

 

           42 

 

         563 

Other, net

             - 

 

        (738)

 

         783 

 

 

 

 

 

 

        Net cash (used) provided by financing activities

    (26,193)

 

    (16,231)

 

   167,950 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND

 

 

 

 

 

    CASH EQUIVALENTS

        (452)

 

  (158,703)

 

   169,445 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:

 

 

 

 

 

        Beginning of year

     13,670 

 

   172,373 

 

      2,928 

 

 

 

 

 

 

        End of year

 $  13,218 

 

 $  13,670 

 

 $172,373 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transfer of securities to Westfield Bank

 $            - 

 

 $            - 

 

 $ (10,153)




F-43




19.

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2010  2009 2008 
  (In thousands) 
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:         
Net Income $3,006  $5,459  $6,691 
Undistributed equity in subsidiaries  13,600   767   (7,144)
Net amortization of premiums and discounts on securities  14   39   10 
Net realized securities losses (gains)  22   2,079   (303)
Change in other liabilities  21   (92)  1 
Change in other assets  367   (789)  414 
Other, net  2,110   2,610   2,327 
             
        Net cash provided by operating activities  19,140   10,073   1,996 
             
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:            
Purchase of securities  -   (5,276)  - 
Proceeds from principal collections  1,160   10,509   5,331 
Sale of securities  4,264   4,394   18,414 
             
        Net cash provided by investing activities  5,424   9,627   23,745 
             
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:            
Cash dividends paid  (14,295)  (14,595)  (17,945)
Common stock repurchased  (16,127)  (13,690)  (10,483)
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation  383   155   334 
Issuance of common stock in connection with stock            
option exercises  1,477   449   1,901 
             
        Net cash used in financing activities  (28,562)  (27,681)  (26,193)
             
DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  (3,998)  (7,981)  (452)
             
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:            
        Beginning of year  5,237   13,218   13,670 
             
        End of year $1,239  $5,237  $13,218 
18.      OTHER NONINTEREST EXPENSE


There is no item that as a component of other noninterest expense exceeded 1% of the aggregate of total interest income and noninterest income for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, 2007 and 2006 respectively.


20.

F-43

19.      SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)


 

2008

 

First Quarter

 

Second
Quarter

 

Third
Quarter

 

Fourth
Quarter

 

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest and dividend income

$      13,769

 

$      13,547

 

 $      13,504 

 

 $      13,236 

Interest expense

6,061

 

5,594

 

            5,405 

 

            5,244 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest and dividend income

7,708

 

7,953

 

            8,099 

 

            7,992 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for loan losses (1)

175

 

240

 

               275 

 

            2,763 

Noninterest income

875

 

932

 

               964 

 

               954 

Gain on sales of securities, net

300

 

19

 

486

 

273

Other than temporary impairment of securities

(310)

 

-

 

(651)

 

(322)

Noninterest expense

5,784

 

5,733

 

            5,783 

 

            6,033 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

2,614

 

2,931

 

            2,840 

 

               101 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income taxes

753

 

811

 

               793 

 

             (562)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

$        1,861

 

$        2,120

 

 $        2,047 

 

 $           663 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per share

$          0.06

 

$          0.07

 

 $          0.07 

 

 $          0.03 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per share

$          0.06

 

$          0.07

 

 $          0.07 

 

 $          0.03 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2007

 

First Quarter

 

Second
Quarter

 

Third Quarter

 

Fourth
Quarter

 

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest and dividend income

$      12,844

 

$      13,059

 

 $      13,752 

 

 $      13,929 

Interest expense

5,323

 

5,646

 

            6,173 

 

            6,266 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest and dividend income

7,521

 

7,413

 

            7,579 

 

            7,663 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for loan losses

100

 

75

 

                 50 

 

               175 

Noninterest income

819

 

974

 

               964 

 

               943 

Loss on sales of premises and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    equipment, net

-

 

-

 

                     - 

 

               546 

Curtailment of defined benefit life insurance plan

-

 

-

 

                     - 

 

               315 

Noninterest expense

5,306

 

5,581

 

            5,351 

 

            5,587 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

2,934

 

2,731

 

            3,142 

 

            3,705 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income taxes

913

 

826

 

               970 

 

            1,103 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

$        2,021

 

$        1,905

 

 $        2,172 

 

 $        2,602 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per share

$          0.07

 

$          0.06

 

 $          0.07 

 

 $          0.09 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per share

$          0.07

 

$          0.06

 

 $          0.07 

 

 $          0.09 


(1) The fourth quarter provision for loan losses includes a specific valuation allowance of $1.9 million relating to a single commercial loan relationship deemed to be impaired.



  2010 
  First Quarter  Second Quarter  Third Quarter  Fourth Quarter 
  (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) 
Interest and dividend income $11,955  $11,595  $11,550  $11,047 
Interest expense  4,264   4,171   4,201   4,129 
                 
Net interest and dividend income  7,691   7,424   7,349   6,918 
                 
Provision for loan losses  500   4,120   3,928   375 
Noninterest income  867   878   836   883 
                 
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses in securities  (1,071)  -   -   (490)
Portion of impairment losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss  971   -   -   443 
Net impairment losses recognized in income  (100)  -   -   (47)
                 
Loss on sales of premises and equipment, net  -   -   -   - 
Loss on prepayment of borrowings  -   -   -   - 
Loss on disposal of OREO  7   (6)  -   - 
Gain (loss) on sales of securities, net  186   1,132   2,609   145 
Noninterest expense  6,395   5,941   6,184   6,289 
                 
Income before income taxes  1,756   (633)  682   1,235 
Income taxes  402   (247)  (17)  (104)
Net income $1,354  $(386) $699  $1,339 
                 
Basic earnings per share $0.05  $(0.01) $0.03  $0.04 
Diluted earnings per share $0.05  $(0.01) $0.03  $0.04 
                 
                 
   2009
  First Quarter  Second Quarter  Third Quarter  Fourth Quarter 
  (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) 
Interest and dividend income $13,102  $12,975  $13,298  $13,155 
Interest expense  5,084   5,169   5,056   4,713 
                 
Net interest and dividend income  8,018   7,806   8,242   8,442 
                 
Provision for loan losses  1,150   590   620   1,540 
Noninterest income  1,060   1,098   951   967 
                 
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses in securities  -   -   (1,343)  (411)
Portion of impairment losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss  -   -   1,157   319 
Net impairment losses recognized in income  -   -   (186)  (92)
                 
Loss on sales of premises and equipment, net  (8)  -   -   - 
Loss on prepayment of borrowings  -   (142)  -   - 
Loss on disposal of OREO  -   -   (110)  - 
Gain (loss) on sales of securities, net  87   122   (774)  182 
Noninterest expense  6,408   7,007   6,064   5,558 
                 
Income before income taxes  1,599   1,287   1,439   2,401 
Income taxes  394   214   197   462 
Net income $1,205  $1,073  $1,242  $1,939 
                 
Basic earnings per share $0.04  $0.04  $0.04  $0.07 
Diluted earnings per share $0.04  $0.04  $0.04  $0.06 
F-44




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

Westfield Financial, Inc.



We have audited Westfield Financial, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.  Westfield Financial Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.


We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.  Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk.  Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.


A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  Also, because management’s assessment and our audit were conducted to meet the reporting requirements of Section 112 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (FDICIA), our audit of Westfield Financial, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting included controls over the preparation of financial statements in accordance with the instructions to the Consolidated Financial Statements for Bank Holding Companies (Form FR Y-9C) and the Office of Thrift Supervision Instructions for Thrift Financial Reports. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (a) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (b) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (c) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.




F-45




In our opinion, Westfield Financial, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.


We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the December 31, 2008 consolidated financial statements of Westfield Financial, Inc. and our report dated March 10, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion.




Wolf and Company, P.C.


Boston, Massachusetts

March 10, 2009




F-46