(Formed name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes  No 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.:

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Act ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive oﬃcers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant (assuming for purposes of this computation only that the directors and executive officers may be affiliates) at June 30, ~~2021,~~2022, which was the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter was approximately $~~144.9~~162.0 million based on the closing price of ~~$15.04~~$16.41 for one share of common stock, as reported on The Nasdaq Global Market on June 30, ~~2021.~~2022.

The number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and Class B common stock, par value $0.01 per share, as of February 25, ~~2022~~2023 were ~~9,869,101~~9,559,587 and ~~4,593,687~~4,545,380, respectively.

Except where the context requires otherwise and as otherwise set forth herein, in this report, references to the “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our” refer to Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (“Silvercrest”) and its consolidated subsidiary, Silvercrest L.P., the managing member of our operating subsidiary (“Silvercrest L.P.” or “SLP”). SLP is a limited partnership whose existing limited partners are referred to in this report as “principals”.

This report contains, and from time to time our management may make, forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended. For those statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions. These statements are only predictions based on our current expectations and projections about future events. Important factors that could cause actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements include but are not limited to: incurrence of net losses, fluctuations in quarterly and annual results, adverse economic or market conditions, our expectations with respect to future levels of assets under management, inflows and outflows, our ability to retain clients from whom we derive a substantial portion of our assets under management, our ability to maintain our fee structure, our particular choices with regard to investment strategies employed, our ability to hire and retain qualified investment professionals, the cost of complying with current and future regulation coupled with the cost of defending ourselves from related investigations or litigation, failure of our operational safeguards against breaches in data security, privacy, conflicts of interest or employee misconduct, our expected tax rate, and our expectations with respect to deferred tax assets, adverse ~~economic or market conditions, including the continued adverse effects of the coronavirus pandemic, incurrence of net losses, adverse~~ effects of management focusing on implementation of a growth strategy, failure to develop and maintain the Silvercrest brand and other factors disclosed under “Risk Factors” in this annual report on Form 10-K. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as required by law.

Our business is subject to risks of which you should be aware before making an investment decision. The risks described below are a summary of the principal risks associated with an investment in us and are not the only risks we face. These and other risks are discussed more fully in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in Part II, Item IA and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (our “Risk Factors”). Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial may also adversely affect our business and the trading price of our securities, particularly in light of the fast-changing nature of the COVID-19 pandemic, containment measures, the potential for future waves of outbreaks and the related impacts to economic and operating conditions.securities.

We were founded 1920 years ago on the premise that if we staffed and organized our business to deliver a combination of excellent investment performance together with high-touch client service, we would differentiate our business from a crowded field of firms nominally in the wealth management business. We seek to attract and serve a base of individuals and families with $10 million or more of investable assets, and we believe we are well-positioned to offer comprehensive investment and family office service solutions to families with over $25 million of investable assets. As of December 31, ~~2021,~~2022, we had ~~873~~841 client relationships with an average size of ~~$37~~$34 million that represented approximately 99% of our assets under management. Our top 50 relationships averaged ~~$381~~$349 million in size, and such amount represented approximately ~~59%~~60% of our assets under management. As a boutique, we are large enough to provide an array of comprehensive capabilities, yet agile enough to coordinate and deliver highly personalized client service.

Our annual client retention rate has averaged 98% since 2006 and, as shown below, the compound annual growth rate, or CAGR, in our assets under management since inception is ~~30%~~28%. Our growth rate in any 12-month period ending on the last day of a fiscal quarter since inception ranged from (23%) to 1,142%, with a mean of ~~36%~~34%. We believe our record of growth is a direct result of our demonstrated record of delivering excellent performance together with highly personalized service to our clients.

Our organic growth has been complemented by selective hiring and by nine successfully completed strategic acquisitions that have expanded not only assets under management, but also our professional ranks, geographic footprint and service capabilities. We believe additional acquisitions will allow us to extend our geographic presence nationally. As we grow, we will maintain our value proposition to continue to deliver to our clients excellent investment performance together with excellent client service, the essence of what differentiates us from our competitors.

Our clients engage us to advise them on traditional investment strategies focused on equities, fixed income and cash as well as non-traditional investment strategies including hedge funds, private equity funds, real estate and commodities. Our clients receive a full menu of proprietary investment capabilities together with a focused array of complementary non-proprietary capabilities offered by unaffiliated firms selected by us. In addition to our investment capabilities, we also provide our clients with family office services and related administrative services, which include financial planning, tax planning and preparation, partnership accounting and fund administration, and consolidated wealth reporting. Our fees for our investment advisory services, non-proprietary services and family office and related administrative services are structured to align our financial incentives with those of our clients to ensure they receive unconflicted advice. The vast majority of our fees are derived from discretionary assets under management, and are based on the value of the assets we manage for our clients. These fees increase if our clients’ assets grow in value; on the other hand, these fees decrease if our clients’ assets decline in value. Unlike our management fees, our fees for family office services and related administrative services are generally not based on or correlated to market values. For these services, we generally charge our clients a negotiated fee based on the scope of work. These services create strong client relationships and contribute meaningfully to our record of client retention.

As of December 31, ~~2021,~~2022, approximately ~~69%~~68% of our discretionary assets under management were held for individual clients and ~~31%~~32% for institutional clients. Based on the results we have achieved in a number of our equity strategies, we continue to attract a significant amount of institutional investor interest. Our equity capabilities are on the approved lists of several prominent institutional consultants and, as a result, we believe significant institutional growth is likely to continue in future years.

When forming our company, our founders had the objective of creating a large full-service boutique operation focused on managing portfolios and delivering financial advice to wealthy individuals and select institutions. We commenced operations in April of 2002 as a corporation. Our first partners and employees came almost entirely from Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette (“DLJ”) Asset Management Group, which had been acquired by Credit Suisse Asset Management in late 2000. In 2002, we carefully recruited and hired the same equity, fixed income and client service teams with whom our clients had worked at DLJ Asset Management Group. As of December 31, ~~2021,~~2022, approximately ~~nine~~eight percent of our ~~148~~154 employees are veterans of DLJ. Many of our principals, therefore, have worked together for 2526 years and, in some cases, even longer.

On June 26, 2013, Silvercrest completed its corporate reorganization, and on July 2, 2013, Silvercrest closed its initial public offering. Prior to that date, Silvercrest was a private company.

Our headquarters are located in New York City with additional offices in Massachusetts, Virginia, New Jersey, California and Wisconsin. From inception, we have embraced an organizational structure in which the primary functions of client service, investments, technology and operations, and business administration are organized and staffed with professionals who specialize in each of those functions. This structure permits each professional to focus on his or her area of expertise without the distraction of other business responsibilities. At many other firms, the senior professionals are expected to serve multiple roles simultaneously, which we believe dilutes the value to clients and makes scaling the business effectively unachievable. We firmly believe that our business structure represents a better approach and will permit us to greatly expand our business on our existing platform.

To meet our primary objective to deliver strong investment results, we seek to add value through our asset allocation advice, as well as through our proprietary equity and fixed income strategies and outsourced investment capabilities. We recruited and hired a team of seasoned securities analysts who have an institutional caliber approach to security selection and a long record of success in implementing their strategies. We encourage them to focus 100% of their professional time on the task of securities selection. Our in-house growth and value equity analysts are focused on U.S. large cap, small cap, smid cap, multi cap, equity income and focused value equity strategies. On the fixed income side, our analysts are focused on high-grade municipals, high-yield municipals and high-grade taxables.

In order to deliver excellent client service, our portfolio managers are charged with the responsibility of working individually with each client to help define investment objectives, risk tolerance, cash flow requirements and other financial needs. Client-facing portfolio managers, their support staffs and the family office services group, account for ~~64%~~65% of our total employees, a reflection of our high commitment to excellent client service. We are staffed to ensure that each client receives senior level personal attention.

We have a staff of nine professionals who work with our portfolio managers to deliver family office services to interested clients. The fees for family office services are negotiated with the client and generally are not asset-based. For this reason, the revenues generated by our family office services are non-correlated to market movements and provide us with a diversified source of earnings. We believe these family office services have been an attractive component of our overall value proposition and engender a stronger relationship with our clients, leading to greater client retention and the institutionalization of client relationships.

We built our company to take market share from financial services firms whose wealth management models we believe are flawed. Our growth strategy has been and will continue to be to grow our business organically, to complement our organic growth with strategic hires and acquisitions and to expand our presence in the institutional market. In support of each of these initiatives we plan to continue to invest in establishing our brand through continued selective advertising and public relations.

We have a proven ability to identify, attract and retain ultra-high net worth clients who seek a firm designed to deliver excellent investment performance and excellent client service. Our organizational model of separate and distinct business functions has proven scalable and our company’s assets under management have grown to ~~$32.3~~$28.9 billion as of December 31, ~~2021~~2022 without a commensurate increase in headcount. Importantly, we have achieved our growth while maintaining our profitability during one of the most challenging periods in the history of the U.S. financial markets. Going forward, we will continue to execute our business plan for attracting ultra-high net worth clients.

The business of attracting ultra-high net worth clients is the business of obtaining referrals and gaining trust. At our company, these responsibilities reside principally with our portfolio managers. Our senior portfolio managers have on average nearly 3841 years of industry experience and they have developed a wealth of contacts and professional referral sources as a result of that experience. In spearheading the effort to deliver excellent performance and service to their clients, our portfolio managers have developed very close relationships with their clients and in many cases these relationships are much older than our company itself. Much of our new business results from referrals from existing clients. In this regard, it is critical that our portfolio managers work closely with each of their clients to establish and maintain the trust that is at the heart of the relationship.

Where appropriate, our portfolio managers are also encouraged to introduce our clients to our family office services capabilities and we have capacity for growth in client utilization of these services. Five of our ten largest clients use our family office services and some of these clients have closed their own family offices to consolidate those activities with us. This is a profitable business for us and it serves to tighten our ties to those clients who avail themselves of the services we offer. It is also extremely useful to us in new business competitions where we use these services as a differentiator from our competitors. We continue to see the opportunity for greater penetration with our current clients in future years.

Complementing the efforts of our senior portfolio managers to cultivate client referrals, our business development team is charged with identifying newly-formed wealth (resulting from merger, acquisition or corporate finance) and then creating customized solicitations. Our objective is two-fold: we will expand awareness of our company and its capabilities by distributing our marketing materials to this new audience and we will attract a certain amount of new business. The basis of this effort is careful research designed to ascertain if the prospect has any relationship with us-or any of our clients or friends-and then our solicitation is tailored to those circumstances.

In all of our business development efforts we devote a great deal of time and effort to developing highly customized and detailed proposals for our prospects. In order to do so, we spend as much time as is required to thoroughly understand the prospect’s circumstances and goals as well as the sources of its dissatisfaction with its existing adviser. Where appropriate our proposals include the integration of our entire suite of family office services. We believe our customized new business presentations distinguish us from both our much larger competitors, which have substantial resources, but whose size, we believe, may impede them from easily tailoring solutions to suit clients’ needs, as well as from our smaller competitors which, we believe, do not have our depth of resources or capabilities.

From our inception, our organic growth has been complemented by selective hiring and strategic acquisitions, which have served to enlarge our client base, expand our professional ranks, increase our geographic presence and broaden our service capabilities. We therefore expect to continue to recruit and hire senior portfolio managers with significant client relationships as well as successful investment professionals with capabilities currently not available internally to us. We have used acquisitions to extend our presence into new geographies (Boston, Virginia, New Jersey, California and Wisconsin) and to gain new investment expertise. The nine strategic acquisitions we have successfully completed have allowed us to benefit from economies of scale and scope.

In making acquisitions, we look for firms with compatible professionals of the highest integrity who believe in our high service-high performance model for the business. It is important that their clientele be principally clients of high net worth and it is helpful if they have similar value and growth-based investment methodologies. These firms are attracted to our company by the strength of our brand, the breadth of our services and the integrity of our people. Often these firms are extremely limited in the investment products and services they can offer their clients and it is not uncommon that they have succession or other management issues to resolve. In addition, the high and growing cost of compliance with federal and state laws governing their business is often an added inducement. We believe we will become the partner of choice for many such firms.

To continue implementing our growth strategy, we intend to establish additional U.S. offices in major wealth centers on the West Coast, in the Southwest and in the Midwest in order to be closer to both our clients and to prospective clients.

Our past acquisitions have sharpened our ability to integrate acquired businesses, and we believe that once we identify an acquisition target we will be able to complete the acquisition and integrate the acquired business expeditiously.

After ~~thirteen~~fourteen years of effort focused on cultivating relationships with institutional investment consultants, we continue to regularly make new business presentations to institutional investors, including public and corporate pension funds, endowments, foundations, and their consultants.

We are on the “approved” lists of certain prominent institutional investment consultants, which means that these consultants would be permitted to recommend our firm to institutional clients in search of a particular investment strategy for their clients. This has significantly enhanced our ability to win mandates that these consultants seek for their institutional clients and, as a result, we have won institutional mandates in our equity strategies. We expect this trend to continue once it is publicly known that these and other institutions have engaged us to manage significant portfolios for them. The importance of institutional growth to our company is noteworthy: institutional assets will likely expand not only our assets under management but also our profit margins; and the due diligence conducted by these institutions before selecting us will ratify and confirm the decisions to hire us made by our individual clients.

Over the past few years we have deliberately and gradually built our team and capability focused on providing Outsourced Chief Investment Officer services (“OCIO”). These services typically involve management on a discretionary or advisory basis for complex, multi-asset class pools of capital, often for tax exempt entities. On a discretionary engagement, our team provides a full-service approach inclusive of asset allocation, manager selection and due diligence, customized portfolio construction and risk analytics. On an advisory basis, these services can be performed without discretion or on a tailored basis. Traditionally, investment committees of these entities would manage the assets directly. However, with the growth in the size and complexity of many asset pools, these entities are often seeking outside management and advice.

We have invested heavily to build, maintain and extend our brand. We have done so in the belief that creating awareness of our company and its differentiated characteristics would support all aspects of our business, but most notably our growth.

With limited resources, we have created a focused national advertising campaign, which has drawn praise from clients, prospects and competitors alike. We have carefully chosen media outlets that reach our target audience efficiently. This effort has resulted in appearances on CNBC. We estimate that the new business that we get directly as a result of our advertising now finances its cost.

Complementing our advertising strategy, and again, with limited resources, we have also invested in an effort to get media coverage of our company in some of the nation’s most prestigious national publications as well as in industry journals and newsletters. This effort has resulted in press coverage by the Wall Street Journal, Barron’s, Bloomberg, the Financial Times and The New York Times as well as various trade publications distributed within our industry. This public relations effort has proven very helpful in establishing our company as a leader in our industry.

We were founded in 2002 to provide independent investment advisory and related family office services to ultra-high net worth individuals and endowments, foundations and other institutional investors. To this end, we are structured to provide our clients with institutional-quality investment management advice and/or services with the superior level of service expected by wealthy individuals.

To provide this high level of service, we rely on portfolio management teams and our family office services team to provide objective, conflict-free investment management selection and a fully integrated, customized family-centric approach to wealth management. We believe the combination of comprehensive family office service, excellent investment capabilities and a high level of personal service allows us to take advantage of economies of scale to service the needs of our ultra-high net worth clients.

We have dedicated investment management teams tasked with successfully implementing their respective investment strategies. To increase the probability of success in meeting this objective, our analysts are not responsible for client interaction, management of our business, marketing or compliance oversight. This enables us to effectively serve ultra-high net worth clients as well as institutions that typically perform in-depth due diligence before selecting a manager.

The Investment Policy & Strategy Group ~~or IPSG,~~(“IPSG”), which is comprised of our chief strategist and several of our senior portfolio managers, is charged with the responsibility of adding value through asset allocation and manager selection. This is done through the use of our proprietary investment management by our internal analysts, and by those whom we believe are best-of-breed external managers.

The IPSG develops model asset allocations assuming differing levels of risk, liquidity and income tolerance as well as conducting outside manager due diligence. Our proprietary model portfolio structures are not merely a backward-looking, mechanical exercise based on the past performance of different asset classes. Instead, our IPSG overlays our judgment on the likely future performance of different asset classes in arriving at optimal portfolio structures. None of our dedicated investment analysts serves on this committee, which safeguards the independence of the IPSG’s recommendations.

Our portfolio managers are responsible for creating a customized investment program for each client based upon the IPSG’s work. An interactive dialogue ensures that each portfolio plan is based upon each client’s defined written objectives. Each client’s portfolio strategy takes into account that client’s risk tolerance, income and liquidity requirements as well as the effect of diversifying out of low-basis and/or sentimental holdings.

Historically, the IPSG has added value to our clients’ portfolios through asset allocation weightings and manager selection.

From inception, we have employed a system of peer group reviews to ensure that client portfolios have been constructed in a manner consistent with our best collective thinking. In annual peer group reviews, the asset allocation within each client portfolio is compared with such portfolio’s defined objectives and portfolios that are not fully aligned with the investment objective are then singled out for further review and discussion. Our objective is for all clients to receive our best thinking and for portfolio managers to manage portfolios consistently with our policy. As a combination of these various factors, the client relationship is with us and not merely with an individual at our company.

We believe that it is impossible for a single manager to perform all forms of investing equally well. Thus, our core proprietary investment capabilities are focused on a narrow range of highly disciplined U.S. equity and fixed income management strategies. Our investment teams have exhibited strong performance records. With respect to these strategies, roughly ~~66%~~61% of our total assets under management are managed in our proprietary investment strategies.

Our outsourced investment capabilities include alternative investments as well as traditional investment approaches in the categories of domestic large, mid and small cap growth equity, international equities and high-yield bonds.

Our equity strategies rely on a team-based investment approach and a rigorous investment process. This approach has resulted in returns that exceed relevant market benchmarks. We believe this team approach has provided and will continue to provide consistency to our investment process and results over the long-term. Our investment analysts are generalists who employ a “bottom-up” equity selection methodology based upon their respective value, growth and international investment styles. Our analysts collectively monitor a universe of approximately 250 stocks that are deemed to be attractively valued relative to their business outlook and management’s history of creating shareholder value.

Once stocks have been approved for investment from this body of research, they become part of one or more model equity portfolios. These are generally large cap, small cap, smid cap, multi-cap, equity income and focused value. Each stock position is continually monitored against its investment thesis to ensure investment discipline, and, leveraging this discipline, we employ a strict policy to trim or sell securities in the following circumstances:

Below is a breakdown of assets among the various proprietary equity strategies as of December 31, ~~2021:~~2022:1

Each of our equity strategies has outperformed its benchmark since inception as illustrated by the following chart:


PROPRIETARY EQUITY PERFORMANCE 1, 2	ANNUALIZED PERFORMANCE
AS OF 12/31/21	INCEPTION	1-YEAR	3-YEAR	5-YEAR	7-YEAR	INCEPTION

PROPRIETARY EQUITY PERFORMANCE 1, 2							ANNUALIZED PERFORMANCE
AS OF 12/31/22							INCEPTION	1-YEAR		3-YEAR		5-YEAR		7-YEAR		INCEPTION
Large Cap Value Composite	4/1/02	31.7	23.3	16.8	14.2	10.4	4/1/02		-11.6		8.3		9.0		12.0		9.2
Russell 1000 Value Index		25.2	17.6	11.2	9.7	8.2			-7.5		6.0		6.7		9.1		7.4

Small Cap Value Composite	4/1/02	25.8	19.1	9.9	10.7	11.2	4/1/02		-10.8		6.2		4.9		9.3		10.1
Russell 2000 Value Index		28.3	18.0	9.1	9.5	8.8			-14.5		4.7		4.1		8.2		7.5

Smid Cap Value Composite	10/1/05	29.0	19.2	11.4	12.1	10.8	10/1/05		-14.8		4.4		4.9		9.6		9.1
Russell 2500 Value Index		27.8	18.3	9.9	9.6	8.6			-13.1		5.2		4.8		8.3		7.2

Multi Cap Value Composite	7/1/02	32.2	22.2	14.4	12.9	10.8	7/1/02		-17.3		6.0		6.3		9.8		9.3
Russell 3000 Value Index		25.4	17.6	11.0	9.7	8.8			-8.0		5.9		6.5		9.1		8.0

Equity Income Composite	12/1/03	28.4	16.5	12.6	11.9	12.1	12/1/03		-7.3		5.4		6.9		10.9		11.0
Russell 3000 Value Index		25.4	17.6	11.0	9.7	9.0			-8.0		5.9		6.5		9.1		8.1

Focused Value Composite	9/1/04	26.4	17.3	11.5	11.5	11.2	9/1/04		-18.4		2.5		3.5		7.9		9.3
Russell 3000 Value Index		25.4	17.6	11.0	9.7	8.8			-8.0		5.9		6.5		9.1		7.8

Small Cap Opportunity Composite	7/1/04	16.9	22.1	14.6	13.7	12.2	7/1/04		-16.0		6.3		7.7		10.5		10.4
Russell 2000 Index		14.8	20.0	12.0	10.8	9.4			-20.4		3.1		4.1		7.9		7.5

Small Cap Growth Composite	7/1/04	20.5	31.4	22.5	18.2	13.1	7/1/04		-25.0		11.4		12.4		14.4		10.6
Russell 2000 Growth Index		2.8	21.2	14.5	11.7	10.0			-26.4		0.6		3.5		7.1		7.6

Smid Cap Growth Composite	1/1/06	13.4	38.7	26.9	19.6	14.0	1/1/06		-32.8		10.3		13.5		14.6		10.5
Russell 2500 Growth Index		5.0	25.1	17.7	13.8	11.4			-26.2		2.9		6.0		9.0		8.7

In the management of fixed income investments, clients typically give us the mandate to produce stable returns to dampen the volatility of their portfolios as a counter-weight to equities as part of their complete asset allocation. For those investors who can take advantage of the tax exemption of municipal bonds, we have developed two high-yield municipal bond products designed to add value to the returns possible from high-grade bonds in a low interest rate environment. Below is the breakdown of assets under management by strategy as of December 31, ~~2021:~~2022:

Our fixed income strategy employs a bottom-up fundamental value approach designed to minimize the risk of loss. Almost all of our bond portfolios are highly customized and focused on income and liquidity generation as opposed to capital appreciation.

Recognizing the value of diversification to our clients, we offer a variety of outsourced investment capabilities designed to complement our proprietary capabilities. These outsourced capabilities include managers who have long records of success in managing growth equities, international equities, taxable high-yield bonds, hedge funds and other strategies not offered on a proprietary basis by us. In selecting these managers, we utilize an investment manager database for initial screening and then a dedicated staff conducts on-site due diligence. Potential managers are reviewed and selected by our IPSG. Our selection criteria include the following:

For large clients with significant hedge fund exposure, we offer a hedge fund advisory service that creates customized hedge fund portfolios. Each of our funds of funds appears below:

We have two types of fee arrangements with outsourced managers. Clients may either pay a discounted fee, negotiated by us, directly to the manager who retains the entire fee, or pay directly to the manager, who then distributes a portion of the fee to us. Clients are informed of the applicable arrangement and sign a written acknowledgement.

We take a holistic approach to client service, whereby a senior portfolio manager spearheads the coordination of the IPSG recommendations, family office services work and the investment management team in order to deliver the full range of our capabilities to the client.

~~Five~~Four out of our ten largest high net worth clients use one or more components of our family office services. We believe that this is an attractive growth area for our company and we have initiated plans to increase the provision of these services to both broaden relationships with existing clients and to attract potential clients. Our family office services are profitable and are not used as a loss-leader for attracting clients. Our family office capabilities include the following:

For institutional client relationships, contact with our clients is handled by a dedicated institutional client service team headed by a Managing Director who also maintains our relationships with institutional investment consultants. This structure permits our investment professionals to maintain their focus on achieving superior investment results without the distraction of client demands.

The wealth management industry is highly competitive and is comprised of many players. We compete directly with some of the largest financial service companies, as well as some of the smallest. We primarily compete on the basis of several factors, including our level of service, the quality of our advice, independence, stability, performance results, breadth of our capabilities and fees. In general, these competitors fall into one of the following categories:

As a registered investment adviser that is not affiliated with other financial firms, we are free from the conflicts associated with brokerage or investment banking firms. In advising our clients on portfolio strategies, we are motivated to meet our clients’ investment objectives—not to generate commissions or placement fees—and to focus solely on providing excellent service and investment performance.

We have the size and resources to compete with larger organizations, and unlike many smaller firms, to provide our clients with fully customized, full-service wealth management and integrated family office solutions.

While many competitors outsource investment management, we have chosen to compete with excellent proprietary investment capabilities coupled with a focused array of complementary non-proprietary capabilities offered by unaffiliated firms. This combination enables us to compete for and win the business of wealthy investors. We believe this is a key to our past and future success.

As of December 31, ~~2021,~~2022, we had ~~146~~152 full-time employees and two part-time employees. None of our employees are subject to a collective bargaining agreement. We believe that relations with our employees continue to remain strong.

We are a full-service wealth management firm and our most important resources are our employees. We have a long history of low employee turnover which is directly the result of a culture that embraces an organizational structure in which the primary functions of client service, investments, technology, operations, and business administration are organized and staffed with professionals who specialize in each of those functions. This structure permits each professional to focus on his or her area of expertise without the distraction of other business responsibilities.

We attract talented individuals who share our entrepreneurial spirit and embrace our culture which is focused on delivering a combination of excellent investment performance together with high-touch client service.

Employees have opportunities for promotion either within their specific discipline or by joining other groups within the firm. We have also gained expertise in several disciplines as a result of acquisitions that we have completed which has resulted in filling necessary roles within the firm. Furthermore, several employees have been promoted to partner throughout our history.

Our firm also provides employees with opportunities to become members of various committees covering many disciplines including technology, operations and the Silvercrest Academy which provides internal professional development to all members of the firm. Many of our younger employees are provided the opportunity to take on leadership roles in the aforementioned committees as part of their own professional development. This allows employees to participate in firm advancement and encourages further collaboration throughout Silvercrest.

We also offer employees tuition assistance in order to support their educational aspirations and development within the firm.

Our employees and culture differentiate Silvercrest from other firms in the wealth management space and we will continue to attract and develop talent necessary to ultimately deliver on the promise of providing exceptional service to our clients and colleagues.

Our only business is acting as the general partner of Silvercrest L.P. and, as such, we will continue to operate and control all of its business and affairs and consolidate its financial results into our financial statements. The ownership interests of holders of limited partnership interests of Silvercrest L.P. are accounted for as a non-controlling interest in our consolidated financial statements.

Net profits, net losses and distributions of Silvercrest L.P. are allocated and made to each of its partners on a pro rata basis in accordance with the number of partnership units of Silvercrest L.P. held by each of them. In addition, Silvercrest L.P. has issued deferred equity units and restricted stock units exercisable for Class B units that entitle the holders thereof to receive distributions from Silvercrest L.P. to the same extent as if the underlying Class B units were outstanding.

Set forth below is our holding company structure and ownership as of December 31, ~~2021.~~2022.

Our business is subject to extensive regulation in the United States at the federal level and, to a lesser extent, the state level. Under these laws and regulations, agencies that regulate investment advisers have broad administrative powers, including the power to limit, restrict or prohibit an investment adviser from carrying on its business in the event that it fails to comply with such laws and regulations. Possible sanctions that may be imposed include the suspension of individual employees, limitations on engaging in certain lines of business for specified periods of time, revocation of investment adviser license and other registrations, censures and fines.

The legislative and regulatory environment in which we operate has undergone significant changes in recent years. New laws or regulations, or changes in the enforcement of existing laws or regulations, applicable to us, our activities and our clients may adversely affect our business. Our ability to function in this environment will depend on our ability to monitor and promptly react to legislative and regulatory changes. There have been a number of highly publicized regulatory inquiries that have focused on the investment management industry. These inquiries have resulted in increased scrutiny of the industry and new rules and regulations for investment advisers. This regulatory scrutiny may limit our ability to engage in certain activities that might be beneficial to our stockholders.

In addition, as a result of market events, acts of serious fraud in the investment management industry and perceived lapses in regulatory oversight, U.S. and non-U.S. governmental and regulatory authorities may increase regulatory oversight of our businesses. We may be adversely affected as a result of new or revised legislation or regulations imposed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”), other U.S. or non-U.S. regulatory authorities or self-regulatory organizations that supervise the financial markets. We also may be adversely affected by changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws and rules by these governmental authorities and self-regulatory organizations, as well as by U.S. and non-U.S. courts. It is impossible to determine the extent of the impact of any new proposed laws, regulations or initiatives that could apply to markets in which we trade, or whether any of those proposals will become law. Compliance with any new laws or regulations could add to our compliance burden and costs and affect the manner in which we conduct our business.

SAMG LLC is registered with the SEC as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”). The Advisers Act, together with the SEC’s regulations and interpretations thereunder, imposes substantive and material restrictions and requirements on the operations of investment advisers. The SEC is authorized to institute proceedings and impose sanctions for violations of the Advisers Act, ranging from fines and censures to termination of an adviser’s registration.

The Advisers Act imposes substantive regulation on virtually all aspects of our business and relationships with our clients. As a registered investment adviser, we are subject to many requirements that cover, among other things, disclosure of information about our business to clients; maintenance of written policies and procedures; maintenance of extensive books and records; restrictions on the types of fees we may charge, including performance fees; solicitation arrangements; engaging in transactions with clients; maintaining an effective compliance program; custody of client assets; client privacy; advertising; pay-to-play; cybersecurity and proxy voting. The SEC has authority to inspect any registered investment adviser from time to time to determine whether the adviser is conducting its activities (i) in accordance with applicable laws, (ii) consistent with disclosures made to clients and (iii) with adequate systems and procedures to ensure compliance.

As an investment adviser, we have a fiduciary duty to our clients. The SEC has interpreted this duty to impose standards, requirements, and limitations on, among other things: trading for proprietary, personal and client accounts; allocations of investment opportunities among clients; use of soft dollars; execution of transactions; and recommendations to clients. We manage 88% of our accounts on a discretionary basis, with authority to buy and sell securities for each portfolio, select broker-dealers to execute trades and negotiate brokerage commission rates. In connection with these transactions, we receive soft dollar credits from broker-dealers that have the effect of reducing certain of our expenses. Section 28(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, provides a “safe harbor” to an investment adviser against claims that it breached its fiduciary duty under state or federal law (including The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, or ERISA) solely because the adviser caused its clients’ accounts to pay more than the lowest available commission for executing a securities trade in return for brokerage and research services. To rely on the safe harbor offered by Section 28(e), (i) we must make a good-faith determination that the amount of commissions is reasonable in relation to the value of the brokerage and research services being received and (ii) the brokerage and research services must provide lawful and appropriate assistance to us in carrying out our investment decision-making responsibilities. In permissible circumstances, we may receive technology-based research, market quotation and/or market survey services which are paid for in whole or in part by soft dollar brokerage arrangements. If our ability to use soft dollars were reduced or eliminated as a result of the implementation of statutory amendments or new regulations, our operating expenses would increase.

Under the Advisers Act, our investment management agreements may not be assigned without client consent. The term “assignment” is broadly defined and includes direct assignments as well as assignments that may be deemed to occur upon the transfer, directly or indirectly, of a controlling interest in an investment adviser.

The failure of SAMG LLC to comply with the requirements of the Advisers Act, and the regulations and interpretations thereunder, could have a material adverse effect on us.

SAMG LLC is registered with the CFTC and the National Futures Association, or the NFA, as a commodity pool operator and commodity trading advisor. Registration subjects us and our affiliates to substantive and material restrictions and requirements, including, among other things, reporting, recordkeeping, disclosure, self-examination and training requirements. Registration also subjects us to periodic on-site audits, and the CFTC is authorized to institute proceedings and impose sanctions for violations of the Commodity Exchange Act of 1974, as amended (the “Commodity Exchange Act”) and/or CFTC rules.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, or the Dodd-Frank Act, was signed into law on July 21, 2010. The Dodd-Frank Act has not caused us to reconsider our basic strategy. However, certain provisions have, and others may continue to increase regulatory burdens related to compliance costs. The scope of many provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act has been, or will be, determined by implementing regulations, some of which will require lengthy proposal and promulgation periods.

Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, the SEC and the CFTC have adopted certain reporting requirements that require that Silvercrest report certain information about a number of our private funds, commodity pools and commodity trading advisory arrangements, including regulations promulgated under the authority given to the SEC and CFTC under Sections 404 and 406 of the Dodd-Frank Act requiring a Form-PF and/or a CTA-PQR and CTA-PR to be filed by us. These filings have necessitated and will continue to necessitate investments in people and systems to ensure timely and accurate reporting. Further, we will need to monitor compliance with new SEC and CFTC rules concerning swaps and other derivatives, including, among other things, designated trading venues, mandated central clearing arrangements and other conduct requirements.

The Dodd-Frank Act affects a broad range of market participants with whom we interact or may interact. Regulatory changes that will affect other market participants are likely to change the way in which we conduct business with our counterparties. Although many aspects of the Dodd-Frank Act have been implemented, there remains significant uncertainty regarding implementation of other aspects of the Dodd-Frank Act. While its impact on the investment management industry and us cannot be predicted at this time, it will continue to be a risk for our business.

To the extent that SAMG LLC or any other of our affiliates acts as or is considered to be a “fiduciary” under ERISA or similar laws with respect to benefit plan clients (including IRAs), itSAMG LLC or the applicable affiliate is subject to certain applicable provisions of ERISA (and/or applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, referred to as the Internal Revenue Code) and to regulations promulgated thereunder. Among other things, ERISA and applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code impose certain duties on persons who act as or who are considered to be fiduciaries under ERISA, prohibit certain transactions involving benefit plan clients and provide monetary penalties and taxes for violations of these prohibitions. Our failure to comply with these requirements could have a material adverse effect on our business.

~~The Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (“AIFMD”) went into effect in~~Many countries other than the ~~European Union (“EU”) on July 22, 2013. The AIFMD imposes significant regulatory requirements on alternative~~United States have enacted laws, rules, and regulations that apply to investment advisers and private fund managers ~~("AIFMs''), operating within~~that offer their services in those jurisdictions. Though it has client relationships with individuals who reside in jurisdictions other than the ~~EU, and prescribes certain conditions with regard to regulatory standards, cooperation and transparency that will need to be satisfied~~United States, Silvercrest does not market or offer its services in ~~order for non-EU AIFMs to market alternative investment funds ("AIFs'') into EU Member~~any jurisdiction other than the United States. To date, we have not registered any funds in EU Member States pursuant to the AIFMD, but we may do so in the future. Should SAMG LLC or any of our other affiliates market AIFs in the EU, they may be subject to significant conditions on their operations.

Similarly, revisions to the EU’s Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II), which took effect in January 2018, introduced new requirements for certain non-EU portfolio managers who provide certain investment services to EU investors. Should SAMG LLC or any of our other affiliates provide such services in the EU, it and such funds may be subject to the regulatory requirements of MiFID II.

Additionally, the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the EU under Article 50 of the Treaty of Lisbon means that EU law still will have effect in the UK during a transitional period, which is expected to last until December 31, 2020 (unless an extension is agreed to between the United Kingdom and the EU). The terms of the United Kingdom’s exit from the EU are not clear, and the shape of the regulatory landscape is not yet defined. The withdrawal process and the uncertainty concerning the United Kingdom’s legal and economic relationship with the EU could cause a period of instability and market volatility, including with respect to opportunity, pricing, regulation and the tax treatment of any United Kingdom investments. It is not possible to ascertain the precise impact these events may have on SAMG LLC.17

In addition, we and/or our affiliates may become subject to additional regulatory demands in the future to the extent we expand our investment advisory business in existing and new jurisdictions. There are also a number of pending or recently enacted legislative and regulatory initiatives in the United States and in other jurisdictions that could significantly impact our business.

Our legal and compliance functions are integrated into a team of professionals. This group is responsible for all legal and regulatory compliance matters, as well as monitoring adherence to client investment guidelines. Senior management is involved at various levels in all of these functions.

We maintain a website at http://ir.silvercrestgroup.com/. We provide access to our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports free of charge through this website as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with the SEC. Paper copies of annual and periodic reports filed with the SEC may be obtained free of charge upon written request by contacting our headquarters at the address located on the front cover of this report or under Investor Relations on our website. In addition, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, By-Laws, Audit Committee Charter, Compensation Committee Charter and Nominating and Governance Committee Charter are available on our website (under Corporate Governance) and are available in print without charge to any stockholder requesting them. The SEC maintains a website that contains reports, information statements, and other information regarding issuers like us who file electronically with the SEC. The SEC’s website is located at www.sec.gov.

Volatile market conditions could adversely affect our business in many ways, including by reducing the value of our assets under management and causing clients to withdraw funds, either of which could materially reduce our revenues, adversely affect our financial condition and earnings, and expose us to litigation risks.

The fees we earn under our investment management agreements with clients are based on the value of our assets under management. The prices of the securities held in the portfolios we manage and, therefore, our assets under management, may decline due to any number of factors beyond our control, including, among others, a declining stock or bond market, general economic downturn, political uncertainty, natural disasters or pandemics (including the most recent coronavirus outbreak), acts of terrorism or other catastrophic or geopolitical events. In periods of difficult market conditions, we may experience accelerated client redemptions or withdrawals if clients move assets to investments they perceive as offering greater opportunity or lower risk, which could further reduce our assets under management in addition to market depreciation. The economic outlook remains uncertain and we continue to operate in a challenging business environment. If market conditions, or actions taken by clients in response to market conditions, cause a decline in our assets under management, it would result in lower investment management fees and other revenue. If our revenues decline without a commensurate reduction in our expenses, our net income will be reduced, and our business will be negatively affected. In addition, while we seek to deliver long-term value to our clients, volatility may lead to under-performance in the near term, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

If market conditions improve greatly, driving the prices of the securities in our clients’ accounts higher, it may lead to withdrawals or redemptions. In many cases, we advise only a portion of our clients’ complete financial portfolio. This is because many clients prefer to diversify their portfolio among more than one asset manager or investment type. As to those clients, if the portion of their portfolio held by us increases significantly, it may become too large a percentage of their overall portfolio, and they may withdraw assets from our management and invest it elsewhere, thereby rebalancing their overall portfolio and returning their allocation to us to its prior level.

The performance of our investment strategies is critical to retaining existing client assets and to attracting new client assets. Our investment strategies may perform poorly for various reasons, including general market conditions, our investment decisions, and the performance of the companies in which we invest on our clients’ behalf. If our investment strategies perform poorly, on an absolute basis or relative to other investment advisers, or if the rankings of mutual funds we sub-advise decline, our clients may withdraw funds or terminate their relationships with us and investors in the mutual funds we sub-advise may redeem their investments, which may cause the revenues that we generate from investment management and other fees to decline. Further, third-party financial intermediaries, advisers, or consultants may rate our investment products poorly, which may lead our existing clients to withdraw funds from our investment strategies or reduce asset inflows from these third parties or their clients.

While clients do not generally have legal recourse against us due to poor investment results, if our investment strategies perform poorly, we are more likely to be subject to litigation brought by dissatisfied clients. In addition, if clients are successful in claiming that their losses resulted from fraud, gross negligence, willful misconduct, breach of contract or other similar misconduct, these clients may have remedies against us and/or our investment professionals under the federal securities laws and/or state law.

We may not be able to maintain our current fee structure as a result of poor investment performance, competitive pressures or as a result of changes in our business mix, which could have a material adverse effect on our profit margins and results of operations.

In recent years, there has been a general trend toward lower fees in the investment management industry. Some of our investment strategies, because they tend to invest in larger-capitalization companies and are designed with larger capacity and to appeal to larger clients, have lower fee schedules. In order to maintain our fee structure in a competitive environment, we must be able to continue to provide investment returns and service that our clients believe justify our fees. If our investment strategies perform poorly, we may be forced to lower our fees in order to retain and attract assets to manage. Furthermore, if an increased part of our assets under management are invested in our larger capacity, lower fee strategies, our revenue could be adversely affected.

The historical returns of our existing investment strategies may not be indicative of future results or of future results of investment strategies that we may develop.

We have outlined the historical returns of our existing investment strategies under the “Business” heading in this report. The historical returns of our strategies should not be considered indicative of the future results of these strategies or of the results of any other strategies that we may develop in the future. The investment performance we achieve for our clients varies over time and the variance can be wide. The historical performance presented herein is as of December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and for the period then ended. The performance we achieve as of a subsequent date and for a subsequent period may be higher or lower and the difference may be material. Our strategies’ returns have benefited during some periods from investment opportunities and positive economic and market conditions. In certain periods, general economic and market conditions have negatively affected investment opportunities and our strategies’ returns. These negative conditions may occur again, and in the future, we may not be able to identify and invest in profitable investment opportunities within our current or future strategies.

We derive a substantial portion of our revenues from a limited number of strategies and clients.

As of December 31, ~~2021, $24.6~~2022, $20.5 billion of our assets under management were concentrated in discretionary managed accounts, and the revenue from these discretionary managed accounts represented approximately 96% of our investment management fees for the twelve months ended December 31, ~~2021.~~2022. In addition, ~~$0.5~~$0.4 billion of our assets under management were invested in private partnerships as of December 31, ~~2021,~~2022, and the revenue from these private partnerships represented approximately 4% of our investment management fees for the twelve months ended December 31, ~~2021.~~2022. As a result, a substantial portion of our operating results depends upon the performance of a limited number of investment strategies used to manage those discretionary managed accounts and private partnerships, and our ability to retain client assets. If a significant portion of the investors in our larger strategies withdrew their investments or terminated their investment management agreements for any reason, including poor investment performance or adverse market conditions, our revenues from those strategies would decline, which would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Furthermore, certain of our strategies may derive a significant portion of their total assets under management from assets of a single client or a small number of clients. If any such clients withdraw all or a portion of their assets under management, our business would be significantly affected, which would negatively impact our investment management fees and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Substantially all of our revenue generating contracts and relationships may be terminated upon no notice.

We derive our revenues principally from our assets under management, which may be reduced by our clients, or investors in the mutual funds we sub-advise, at any time. Any client may reallocate all or a portion of their assets under management with us at any time, on little to no notice. In addition, investors in the mutual funds we advise can redeem their investments in those funds at any time without prior notice. Further, our investment management agreements may be terminated or not renewed by our clients upon short notice or no notice, for any reason. The decrease in revenues that could result from a reduction in assets under management or the termination of a material client relationship or group of client relationships could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our long-only, equity investment focus may not obtain attractive returns in the short-term or during certain market periods and may expose us to greater risk than if our investment strategies included non-equity securities or hedged positions.

Even when securities prices are rising generally, portfolio performance may be affected by our investment approach. Our investment strategies employ a long-term investment approach, which has outperformed the market in some economic and market environments and underperformed it in others. A prolonged period in which the growth style of investing outperforms the value style may cause portions of our investment strategy to go out of favor with some clients, consultants, or third-party intermediaries. Poor performance relative to peers, coupled with changes in personnel, unfavorable market environments or other difficulties may result in significant withdrawals of client or investor assets, client or investor departures or otherwise result in a reduction in our assets under management.

Our products are best suited for investors with long-term investment horizons. In order for our classic value investment approach to yield attractive returns, we must typically hold securities for an average of over three years. Therefore, our investment strategies may not perform well during short periods of time. In addition, our strategies may not perform well during points in the economic cycle when value-oriented stocks are relatively less attractive. For instance, during the late stages of an economic cycle or during periods where the markets are focused on one investment thesis or sector, investors may purchase relatively expensive stocks in order to obtain access to above average growth, as was the case in the late 1990s.

Our largest equity investment strategies hold long positions in publicly traded equity securities of companies across a wide range of market capitalizations, geographies and industries. Accordingly, when there is a general decline in the value of equity securities, each of our equity strategies is likely to perform poorly on an absolute basis. Aside from our privately managed funds and funds of funds, we do not have strategies that invest in privately held companies or take short positions in equity securities, which could offset some of the poor performance of our long-only, equity strategies. Even if our investment performance remains strong during declining market conditions relative to other long-only, equity strategies, investors may withdraw assets from our management or allocate a larger portion of their assets to non-long-only or non-equity strategies. In addition, the prices of equity securities may fluctuate more widely than the prices of other types of securities, making the level of our assets under management and related revenues more volatile.

The performance of our investment strategies or the growth of our assets under management may be constrained by the unavailability of appropriate investment opportunities.

Our investment performance depends in large part on our investment teams’ ability to identify appropriate investment opportunities. If any of our investment teams are unable to timely identify sufficiently appropriate investment opportunities for existing and new client assets, the investment performance of the relevant investment strategy could be adversely affected. In addition, if we determine that there are insufficient investment opportunities available for a strategy, we may restrict the strategy’s growth by closing the strategy to all or substantially all new investors or otherwise taking action to limit the flow of assets into the strategy. If we misjudge the point at which it would be optimal to limit access to or close a strategy, the strategy’s investment performance could be negatively impacted. The availability of sufficiently appropriate investment opportunities is influenced by a number of factors, including general market conditions. The risk that such opportunities may be unavailable is particularly acute with respect to our small cap and smid cap strategies that focus on small-cap investments, and is likely to increase as our assets under management increase, particularly if these increases occur very rapidly. If we are unable to identify appropriate investment opportunities, our growth and results of operations may be negatively affected. As of the filing of this annual report, our small cap value strategy is closed to new investors. The strategy may be reopened if one or more of our investors elects to rebalance its assets, which may occur at any time.

Our investment process requires us to conduct extensive fundamental research on any company before investing in it, which may result in missed investment opportunities and reduce the performance of our investment strategies.

Before we add any security to our portfolio, we undergo an in-depth research process, which takes a considerable amount of time, in order to understand the company and the business well enough to make an informed decision as to whether we are willing to own a significant position in a company, whose current earnings are below its historic norms and that does not yet have earnings visibility. However, the time we take to make this judgment may cause us to miss the opportunity to invest in a company that has a sharp and rapid earnings recovery. Any such missed investment opportunity could adversely impact the performance of our investment strategies.

Our International Equity Strategies invest principally in the securities of non-U.S. companies, which involve foreign currency exchange, tax, political, social and economic uncertainties and risks.

As of December 31, ~~2021,~~2022, our international equity strategies, which invest primarily in companies domiciled outside of the United States, accounted for approximately ~~1.1%~~0.9% of our assets under management. In addition, some of our other strategies also invest on a more limited basis in securities of non-U.S. companies. Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could negatively affect the returns of our clients who are invested in these strategies. In addition, an increase in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to non-U.S. currencies is likely to result in a decrease in the U.S. dollar value of our assets under management, which, in turn, could result in lower revenue since we report our financial results in U.S. dollars.

Investments in non-U.S. issuers may also be affected by tax positions taken in countries or regions in which we are invested, as well as political, social and economic uncertainty, particularly as a result of the recent decline in economic conditions. Declining tax revenues may cause governments to assert their ability to tax the local gains and/or income of foreign investors (including our clients), which could adversely affect clients’ interests in investing outside the United States. Many financial markets are not as developed, or as efficient, as the U.S. financial markets, and, as a result, those markets may have limited liquidity and higher price volatility. Liquidity also may be adversely affected by political or economic events within a particular country, and our ability to dispose of an investment also may be adversely affected if we increase the size of our investments in smaller non-U.S. issuers. Non-U.S. legal and regulatory environments, including financial accounting standards and practices, also may be different, and there may be less publicly available information about such companies. These risks could adversely affect the performance of our International Equity Strategies and may be particularly acute in the emerging or less developed markets in which we invest.

Our efforts to establish new investment teams and strategies may be unsuccessful and could negatively impact our results of operations and our reputation.

As part of our growth strategy, we may seek to take advantage of opportunities to add new investment teams. To the extent we are unable to recruit and retain investment teams that complement our business model, we may not successfully diversify our investment strategies and client assets, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and future prospects. In addition, the costs associated with establishing a new team and investment strategy initially will exceed the revenues they generate. If any such new strategies perform poorly or fail to attract sufficient assets to manage, our results of operations and reputation and the reputation of our investment strategies may be negatively impacted.

We may enter into new lines of business, make strategic investments or acquisitions or enter into joint ventures, each of which may result in additional risks and uncertainties for our business.

Subject to market conditions, we may choose to grow our business through, among other things, (i) increasing assets under management in existing investment strategies, (ii) pursuing new investment strategies, which may be similar or complementary to our existing strategies or be wholly new initiatives, or (iii) consummating acquisitions of other investment advisers or entering into joint ventures.

Making strategic investments or acquisitions and entering into strategic relationships, joint ventures, or new lines of business, involve numerous risks and uncertainties, including those associated with investment of capital and other resources and with combining or integrating operational and management systems and controls and managing potential conflicts. Entry into certain lines of business may subject us to new laws and regulations and may lead to increased litigation and regulatory risk. If a new business generates insufficient revenues, produces investment losses, or if we are unable to efficiently manage our expanded operations, our results of operations will be adversely affected, and our reputation and business may be harmed. In the case of joint ventures, we are subject to additional risks and uncertainties in that we may be dependent upon, and subject to liability, losses or reputational damage relating to, systems, controls and personnel that are not under our control.

We may be unable to successfully execute strategic investments or acquisitions or enter into joint ventures, and we may fail to successfully integrate and operate new investment teams, which could limit our ability to grow assets under management and adversely affect our results of operations.

Although we periodically consider strategic investments or acquisitions as part of our growth strategy, we have not at this time entered into any binding agreements with respect to any strategic investments or acquisitions or any strategic relationships or joint ventures and we cannot assure you that we will actually make any additional acquisitions. Our ability to execute our acquisition strategy will depend on our ability to identify new lines of businesses or new investment teams that meet our investment criteria and to successfully negotiate with the owners/managers who may not wish to give up control of the target fund general partner or managing member, as the case may be. We cannot be certain that we will be successful in finding new investment teams or investing in new lines of business or that they will have favorable operating results following our acquisitions.

Moreover, our future acquisition strategies may focus on privately-held asset managers that pursue single strategy specialized investments. This approach presents challenges, including the lack of publicly available information, and greater risks than are generally associated with transactions with more traditional asset managers. The asset managers that we may acquire and their financial information may not be subject to the reporting requirements and other rules that govern public companies, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or Sarbanes-Oxley. Moreover, such asset managers may not be subject to regulation under the Advisers Act and/or the Commodity Exchange Act at the time we acquire them. As a result, such asset managers could be more susceptible to irregular accounting or fraudulent practices. The targets we seek to acquire in the future may have shorter operating histories than us on which to estimate future performance and may not have significant or any operating revenues. They also may have a lower capitalization and fewer resources (including cash) and be more vulnerable to failure than traditional asset managers. We will be required to rely on the ability of the professionals employed by us to obtain adequate information to evaluate the manager affiliates we seek to acquire.

In addition, our ability to acquire asset managers on favorable terms and successfully integrate and operate them is subject to the following significant risks:

If we cannot complete acquisitions of such asset managers on favorable terms, or integrate or operate new investment teams to meet our goals or expectations, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, trading price of our common stock and ability to satisfy any debt service obligations and to pay distributions could be adversely affected. Additionally, any acquisitions that we make generally will not be subject to our stockholders’ consent. These factors increase the risk of investing in our Class A common stock.

The due diligence process that we undertake in connection with strategic investments or acquisitions or entry into joint ventures may not reveal all facts that may be relevant in connection with an investment, which could subject us to unknown liabilities.

In connection with strategic investments, acquisitions or entry into joint ventures, we conduct due diligence that we deem reasonable and appropriate based on the facts and circumstances applicable to such investments, acquisitions or joint ventures and expect to use our resources and oversight to enhance the risk management functions and diligence of our business and any investments going forward. When conducting due diligence, we have been required and will be required to evaluate important and complex business, financial, tax, accounting and legal issues. Outside consultants, legal advisers, accountants and investment banks may be involved in the due diligence process in the future in varying degrees depending on the type of investment. When conducting due diligence and making an assessment regarding a strategic investment, acquisition or joint venture, we have and will continue to rely on the resources available to us, including information provided by the target of the strategic investment, acquisition or joint venture, in some circumstances, third-party investigations. The due diligence investigations that we have carried out or will carry out with respect to any strategic investment, acquisition or joint venture may not reveal or highlight all relevant facts that may be necessary or helpful in evaluating the strategic investment, acquisition or joint venture, which could subject us to unknown liabilities that could adversely affect our profitability, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, such investigations will not necessarily result in the strategic investment, acquisition or joint venture being successful.

Our assets under management have increased from $7.8 billion as of December 31, 2006 to ~~$32.3~~$28.9 billion as of December 31, ~~2021.~~2022. The absolute measure of our assets under management represents a significant rate of growth that may be difficult to sustain. The growth of our business will depend on, among other things, our ability to retain key investment professionals, to devote sufficient resources to maintaining existing investment strategies and to selectively develop new investment strategies. Our business growth also will depend on our success in achieving superior investment performance from our investment strategies, as well as our ability to maintain and extend our distribution capabilities, to deal with changing market conditions, to maintain adequate financial and business controls and to comply with new legal and regulatory requirements arising in response to both the increased sophistication of the investment management industry and the significant market and economic events of the last few years. If we believe that in order to continue to produce attractive returns from some or all of our investment strategies we should limit the growth of those strategies, we have in the past chosen, and in the future may choose, to limit or close access to those strategies to some or most categories of new investors or clients or otherwise take action to slow the flow of assets into those strategies.

In addition, we expect there to be significant demand on our infrastructure and investment teams and we may not be able to manage our growing business effectively or be able to sustain the level of growth we have achieved historically, and any failure to do so could adversely affect our ability to generate revenue and control our expenses.

The loss of key investment professionals or members of our senior management team could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We depend on the skills and expertise of our investment professionals and our success depends on our ability to retain the key members of our senior management and investment teams, who possess substantial experience in investing and have been primarily responsible for the historically strong investment performance we have achieved. In particular, we depend on our portfolio managers. As of December 31, ~~2021, $15~~2022, $12.6 billion, representing ~~47%~~44% of our assets under management, were managed using one of our proprietary equity strategies. Our five largest strategies as of December 31, ~~2021~~2022 were Small Cap Value, ~~Equity Income,~~ Large Cap Value, Equity Income, Multi Cap Value and ~~Small~~Smid Cap ~~Opportunity~~Value which represented ~~27%~~23%, ~~18%~~22%, ~~18%~~19%, ~~12%~~11% and 8%10% of assets under management, respectively. Each of these five strategies has been managed by its current portfolio manager since its inception at Silvercrest.

Because of the long tenure and stable track record of our portfolio managers, our clients may attribute the investment performance we have achieved to these individuals. While we have generally experienced very few departures among our portfolio managers, there can be no assurance that this stability will continue in the future. The departure of one of a strategy’s portfolio managers could cause clients to withdraw funds from the strategy, which would reduce our assets under management, our investment management and other fees and, if we were not able to reduce our expenses sufficiently, our net income, and these reductions could be material to our business. The departure of one of a strategy’s portfolio managers also could cause clients or investors to refrain from allocating additional funds to the strategy or delay such allocation of additional funds until a sufficient track record under a new portfolio manager or managers has been established. This would have a negative effect on the future growth of our assets under management and, therefore, our results of operations.

We depend on the contributions of our senior management team led by Richard R. Hough III, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, as well as other members of our senior management team. In addition, our senior marketing and client service personnel have direct contact with our clients and their consultants and advisors and other key individuals within each of our distribution channels. The loss of any of these key professionals could limit our ability to successfully execute our business strategy, prevent us from sustaining the historically strong investment performance and adversely affect our ability to retain or attract client assets.

If any member of our senior management or a key investment professional were to join a competitor or form a competing company, some of our current clients or other prominent members of the investing community could choose to invest with that competitor rather than us.

Certain of our investment or management professionals have resigned and joined a competitor, and others may resign at any time, join our competitors or form competing companies. Although the unvested shares of Class A common stock and Class B units held by our principals are subject to forfeiture, and the vested shares of Class A common stock and Class B units held by our principals are subject to repurchase, if the principal voluntarily resigns or retires and competes with us while employed or during the 12-month period following termination of employment, these forfeiture and repurchase provisions may not be enforceable or may not be enforceable to their full extent. We do not carry “key man” insurance on any of our key investment professionals that would provide us with proceeds in the event of the death or disability of any of the key members of our investment or management teams.

The professional reputations, expertise in investing and client relationships of our senior management and key investment professionals are important elements to executing our business strategy and attracting and retaining clients. Accordingly, the retention of our senior management and key investment professionals is a key element to our future success. There is no guarantee that they will not resign, join our competitors or form a competing company. The terms of the second amended and restated limited partnership agreement of Silvercrest L.P. restrict each of the principals of Silvercrest L.P. from soliciting our clients or other employees during the term of their employment with us and for 18 months thereafter. In addition to the legal rights and remedies available to us to enforce these restrictive covenants, the penalty for a breach of these restrictive covenants or, if a principal voluntarily resigns or retires from our company, for competing with us during the 12-month period following termination of employment, will be the forfeiture of all of the unvested shares of Class A common stock and Class B units of the offending party and his or her permitted transferees and, at the option of Silvercrest L.P., the required sale to Silvercrest L.P. of all of the vested Class B units of the offending party and his or her permitted transferees at a purchase price equal to the lesser of (i) the aggregate capital account balance of the offending party and his or her permitted transferees in Silvercrest L.P. and (ii) the purchase price paid by the offending party to first acquire the Class B units, and, at our option, the required sale to us of all of the Class A common stock collectively held by the offending party and his or her permitted transferees at a purchase price equal to the purchase price paid by the offending party to first acquire the Class B units for which such shares of Class A common stock had been exchanged. Although we also would likely seek specific performance of these restrictive covenants, there can be no assurance that we would be successful in obtaining this relief. Further, after this post-employment restrictive period, we will not be able to prohibit a departed professional from soliciting our clients or employees. If any of our principals were to join a competitor or form a competing company, some of our current clients or other prominent members of the investing community could choose to invest with that competitor rather than us or otherwise withdraw assets from our company which could have a negative impact on our results of operations.

Competition for qualified investment, management and marketing and client service professionals is intense and we may fail to successfully attract and retain qualified personnel in the future.

Our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel will depend heavily on the amount and structure of compensation and opportunities for equity ownership we offer. Historically we have offered key employees equity ownership through interests in Silvercrest L.P. Those key employees who are currently limited partners of Silvercrest L.P. hold these interests in the form of Class B units. We expect our compensation structure to include a combination of cash and equity-based incentives as appropriate. Although we intend for overall compensation levels to remain commensurate with amounts paid to our key employees in the past, we may not be successful in designing and implementing an attractive compensation model. Any cost-reduction initiative or adjustments or reductions to compensation could negatively impact our ability to retain key personnel. In addition, changes to our management structure, corporate culture and corporate governance arrangements could negatively impact our ability to retain key personnel. If we are unable to retain key personnel, our results of operations may be negatively affected.

The rights of holders of Class B units of Silvercrest L.P. may give rise to conflicts of interest.

As a result of our principals holding all or a portion of their ownership interests in our business through Silvercrest L.P., rather than through Silvercrest, these existing owners may have other conflicting interests with holders of our Class A common stock. For example, our principals may have different tax positions from holders of our Class A common stock which could influence their decisions regarding whether and when we should dispose of assets, whether and when we should incur new or refinance existing indebtedness, especially in light of the existence of the tax receivable agreement that was entered into in connection with our initial public offering, and whether and when our company should terminate the tax receivable agreement and accelerate its obligations thereunder. Also, the structuring of future transactions may take into consideration our principals’ tax or other considerations even where no similar benefit would accrue to us.

Our ability to pay regular dividends to our stockholders is subject to the discretion of our board of directors and may be limited by our structure and applicable provisions of Delaware law.

We intend to declare cash dividends on our Class A common stock. However, our board of directors may, in its sole discretion, change the amount or frequency of dividends or discontinue the payment of dividends entirely. In addition, because of our structure, we will be dependent upon the ability of our subsidiaries to generate earnings and cash flows and distribute them to us so that we may pay dividends to our stockholders. We expect to cause Silvercrest L.P., which is a Delaware limited partnership, to make distributions to its partners, including us, in an amount sufficient for us to pay dividends. However, its ability to make such distributions will be subject to its subsidiaries’ operating results, cash requirements and financial condition, the applicable provisions of Delaware law that may limit the amount of funds available for distribution to its partners, its compliance with covenants and financial ratios related to current and future indebtedness (including the credit facility entered into in June 2013 by the subsidiaries of Silvercrest L.P.), its other agreements with third parties, as well as its obligation to make tax distributions under the second amended and restated limited

partnership agreement (which distributions would reduce the cash available for distributions by Silvercrest L.P. to us). As a Delaware corporation, our ability to pay cash dividends to our Class A common stockholders with the distributions received by us as general partner of Silvercrest L.P. also will be subject to the applicable provisions of Delaware law. Also, each of the companies in the corporate chain must manage its assets, liabilities and working capital in order to meet all of its cash obligations, including the payment of dividends or distributions. As a consequence of these various limitations and restrictions, we may not be able to make, or may have to reduce or eliminate, the payment of dividends on our Class A common stock. Any change in the level of our dividends or the suspension of the payment thereof could adversely affect the market price of our Class A common stock.

Our ability to pay taxes and expenses, including payments under the tax receivable agreement, may be limited by our structure.

We have no material assets other than our ownership of Class A units of Silvercrest L.P. and have no independent means of generating revenue. Silvercrest L.P. is treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes and, as such, is not subject to U.S. federal income tax. Instead, taxable income is allocated to holders of its partnership units, including us. Accordingly, we will incur income taxes on our proportionate share of any net taxable income of Silvercrest L.P. and also will incur expenses related to our operations. Under the terms of its second amended and restated limited partnership agreement, Silvercrest L.P. is obligated to make tax distributions to holders of its partnership units, including us. In addition to tax expenses, we also will incur expenses related to our operations, including expenses under the tax receivable agreement, which we expect will be significant. We intend to cause Silvercrest L.P. to make distributions in an amount sufficient to allow us to pay our taxes and operating expenses, including any payments due under the tax receivable agreement. However, its ability to make such distributions will be subject to various limitations and restrictions as set forth in the preceding risk factor. If, as a consequence of these various limitations and restrictions, we do not have sufficient funds to pay tax or other liabilities to fund our operations, we may need to borrow funds, which could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and financial condition. To the extent we are unable to make payments under the tax receivable agreement for any reason, such payments will be deferred and will accrue interest at LIBOR plus 300 basis points until paid.

We will be required to pay principals for certain tax benefits we may claim, and the amounts we may pay could be significant.

The corporate reorganization of Silvercrest L.P. resulted in favorable tax attributes for us. In addition, future exchanges of Class B units of Silvercrest L.P. held by our principals for shares of our Class A common stock are expected to produce additional favorable tax attributes for us. When we acquire Class B units from existing principals, both the existing basis and the anticipated basis adjustments are likely to increase (for tax purposes) depreciation and amortization deductions allocable to us from Silvercrest L.P. and therefore reduce the amount of income tax we would otherwise be required to pay in the future. This increase in tax basis also may decrease gain (or increase loss) on future dispositions of certain capital assets to the extent the increased tax basis is allocated to those capital assets.

The tax receivable agreement, which we entered into with our principals, generally provides for the payment by us to each of them of 85% of the amount of the cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal and state income tax that we actually realize (or are deemed to realize in certain circumstances) in periods after our initial public offering as a result of (i) any step-up in tax basis in Silvercrest L.P.’s assets resulting from (a) the purchases or exchanges of Class B units (along with the corresponding shares of our Class B common stock) for shares of our Class A common stock and (b) payments under this tax receivable agreement; (ii) certain prior distributions by Silvercrest L.P. and prior transfers or exchanges of Class B units which resulted in tax basis adjustments to the assets of Silvercrest L.P.; and (iii) tax benefits related to imputed interest deemed to be paid by us as a result of this tax receivable agreement.

We expect that the payments we will be required to make under the tax receivable agreement will be substantial. Assuming no material changes in the relevant tax law and that we earn sufficient taxable income to realize all tax benefits that are subject to the tax receivable agreement, we expect that the reduction in tax payments for us associated with (i) the purchase of Class B units from certain of the limited partners of Silvercrest L.P. with a portion of the net proceeds of our initial public offering and (ii) exchanges of Class B units subsequent to our initial public offering as described above would aggregate approximately ~~$10.8~~$6.9 million over a 15-year period. Under such scenario we would be required to pay the holders of Class B limited partnership units approximately ~~$9.2~~$8.9 million, over a 15-year period. The actual amounts may materially differ from these hypothetical amounts, as potential future reductions in tax payments for us and tax receivable agreement payments by us will be calculated using the market value of our Class A common stock and the prevailing tax rates at the time of the exchange and will be dependent on us generating sufficient future taxable income to realize the benefit.

The actual increase in tax basis, as well as the amount and timing of any payments under this agreement, will vary depending upon a number of factors, including the timing of exchanges by principals, the price of our Class A common stock at the time of the exchange, the extent to which such exchanges are taxable, the amount and timing of the taxable income we generate in the future and the tax rate then applicable, as well as the portion of our payments under the tax receivable agreement constituting imputed interest or depreciable or amortizable basis. Payments under the tax receivable agreement will be based on the tax reporting positions that we determine. Although we are not aware of any issue that would cause the Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, to challenge a tax basis

increase or other tax attributes subject to the tax receivable agreement, we will not be reimbursed for any payments previously made under the tax receivable agreement. As a result, in certain circumstances, payments could be made under the tax receivable agreement in excess of the benefits that we actually realize in respect of the attributes to which the tax receivable agreement relates.

In certain cases, payments under the tax receivable agreement to our principals may be accelerated and/or significantly exceed the actual benefits we realize in respect of the tax attributes subject to the tax receivable agreement.

The tax receivable agreement provides that upon certain mergers, asset sales, other forms of business combinations or other changes of control, or if, at any time, we elect an early termination of the tax receivable agreement, our (or our successor’s) obligations under the tax receivable agreement (with respect to all Class B units held by our principals, whether or not such Class B units have been exchanged or acquired before or after such transaction) would be based on certain assumptions, including that we would have sufficient taxable income to fully avail ourselves of the deductions arising from the increased tax deductions and tax basis and other benefits related to entering into the tax receivable agreement. As a result, (i) we could be required to make payments under the tax receivable agreement that are greater than or less than the specified percentage of the actual benefits we realize in respect of the tax attributes subject to the tax receivable agreement, and (ii) if we elect to terminate the tax receivable agreement early, we would be required to make an immediate payment equal to the present value of the anticipated future tax benefits, which payment may be made significantly in advance of the actual realization of such future benefits. In these situations, our obligations under the tax receivable agreement could have a substantial negative impact on our liquidity and could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing certain mergers, asset sales, other forms of business combinations or other changes of control. There can be no assurance that we will be able to finance our obligations under the tax receivable agreement. If we were to elect to terminate the tax receivable agreement, we estimate that we would be required to pay approximately ~~$9.2~~$8.9 million in the aggregate under the tax receivable agreement.

If we were deemed an investment company under the Investment Company Act as a result of our ownership interest in Silvercrest L.P., applicable restrictions could make it impractical for us to continue our business as contemplated and could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We do not believe that we are an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act. Because we, as the sole general partner of Silvercrest L.P., control and operate Silvercrest L.P., we believe that our interest in Silvercrest L.P. is not an “investment security” as that term is used in the Investment Company Act. If we were to cease participation in the management of Silvercrest L.P., our interest in Silvercrest L.P. could be deemed an “investment security” for purposes of the Investment Company Act. A person may be an “investment company” if it owns investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items). Our sole asset is our general partner interest in Silvercrest L.P. A determination that such investment was an investment security could cause us to be deemed an investment company under the Investment Company Act and to become subject to the registration and other requirements of the Investment Company Act. In addition, we do not believe that we are an investment company under Section 3(b)(1) of the Investment Company Act because we are not primarily engaged in a business that causes us to fall within the definition of “investment company.” We and Silvercrest L.P. intend to conduct our operations so that we will not be deemed an investment company. However, if we were to be deemed an investment company, restrictions imposed by the Investment Company Act, including limitations on our capital structure and our ability to transact with affiliates, could make it impractical for us to continue our business as contemplated and could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We provide a broad range of services to the Silvercrest Funds and family office services, which may expose us to liability.

We provide a broad range of administrative services to the management of certain of our company’s funds of funds and other investment funds (collectively, the “Silvercrest Funds”), including preparation or supervision of the preparation of some of the Silvercrest Funds’ regulatory filings, provision of shareholder services and communications, accounting services including the supervision of the activities of Silvercrest Funds’ accounting services providers in the calculation of the funds’ net asset values, supervision of the preparation of Silvercrest Funds’ financial statements and coordination of the audits of those financial statements, tax services, including supervision of tax return preparation and supervision of the work of Silvercrest Funds’ other service providers. If it were determined that the Silvercrest Funds failed to comply with applicable regulatory requirements as a result of action or failure to act by our employees, we could be responsible for losses suffered or penalties imposed.

We also provide a range of family office services to some of our clients, including philanthropic, estate and wealth planning services, tax planning and preparation, financial statement, bill paying and record keeping services, bank loan arrangement and payment services and property and casualty insurance review. If we fail to perform these services properly, we could incur costs and reputational harm for which we might be liable. Further, we could have penalties imposed on us, be required to pay fines or be subject to private litigation, any of which could decrease our future income, or negatively affect our current business or our future growth prospects.

The regulatory environment in which we operate is subject to continuous change, and regulatory developments designed to increase oversight may adversely affect our business.

The legislative and regulatory environment in which we operate has undergone significant changes in the recent past, including additional filings with the SEC and the CFTC required by investment advisors, which have resulted in increased costs to the Company. Significant regulatory changes in our industry may to continue, which would likely subject industry participants to additional, more costly and generally more detailed regulation. New laws or regulations, or changes in the enforcement of existing laws or regulations, applicable to us and our clients may adversely affect our business. Our ability to function in this environment will depend on our ability to monitor and promptly react to legislative and regulatory changes. There have been a number of highly publicized regulatory inquiries that have focused on the investment management industry. These inquiries already have resulted in increased scrutiny of the industry and new rules and regulations for investment advisers. This regulatory scrutiny may limit our ability to engage in certain activities that might be beneficial to our stockholders.

In addition, acts of serious fraud in the investment management industry and perceived lapses in regulatory oversight, U.S. and non-U.S. governmental and regulatory authorities may increase regulatory oversight of our businesses. We may be adversely affected as a result of new or revised legislation or regulations imposed by the SEC, the CFTC, other U.S. or non-U.S. governmental regulatory authorities or self-regulatory organizations that supervise the financial markets. We also may be adversely affected by changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws and rules by these governmental authorities and self-regulatory organizations, as well as by U.S. and non-U.S. courts. It is impossible to determine the extent of the impact of any new laws, regulations or initiatives that may be proposed on us or the markets in which we trade, or whether any of the proposals will become law. Compliance with any new laws or regulations could add to our compliance burden and costs and affect the manner in which we conduct business.

Failure to comply with “pay to play” regulations implemented by the SEC and certain states, and changes to the “pay to play” regulatory regimes, could adversely affect our business.

The SEC and several states have initiated investigations alleging that certain private equity firms and hedge funds or agents acting on their behalf have paid money to current or former government officials or their associates in exchange for improperly soliciting contracts with state pension funds. The SEC has also recently initiated a similar investigation into contracts awarded by sovereign wealth funds. The SEC approved Rule 206(4)-5 under the Advisers Act regarding “pay to play” practices by investment advisers involving campaign contributions and other payments to government officials able to exert influence on potential government entity clients. Among other restrictions, the rule prohibits investment advisers from providing advisory services for compensation to a government entity for two years, subject to very limited exceptions, after the investment adviser, its senior executives or its personnel involved in soliciting investments from government entities have made contributions to certain candidates and officials in a position to influence the hiring of an investment adviser by such government entity. Advisers are required to implement compliance policies designed, among other matters, to track contributions by certain of the adviser’s employees and engagements of third parties that solicit government entities (and political action committees controlled by such persons) and to keep certain records in order to enable the SEC to determine compliance with the rule. Additionally, California enacted legislation that requires placement agents (including in certain cases employees of investment managers) who solicit funds from California state retirement systems, such as the California Public Employees’ Retirement System and the California State Teachers’ Retirement System, to register as lobbyists, thereby becoming subject to increased reporting requirements and prohibited from receiving contingent compensation for soliciting investments from California state retirement systems. There also has been similar rulemaking in New York and other states. Such additional regulations may require the attention of senior management and may result in fines if any of our funds are deemed to have violated any regulations, thereby imposing additional expenses on us. Any failure on our part to comply with these rules could cause us to lose compensation for our advisory services or expose us to significant penalties and reputational damage.

We could be subject to regulatory investigations, which could harm our reputation and cause our funds to lose existing investors or us to lose existing accounts or fail to attract new investors or accounts.

If we fail to comply with applicable laws or regulations could result in fines, suspensions of individual employees or other sanctions. Even if an investigation or proceeding did not result in a fine or sanction or the fine or sanction imposed against us or our employees by a regulator were small in monetary amount, the adverse publicity relating to an investigation, proceeding or imposition of these fines or sanctions could harm our reputation and cause our funds to lose existing investors or us to lose existing accounts or fail to attract new investors or accounts.

Ongoing trade negotiations and potential for further regulatory reform may create regulatory uncertainty for our portfolio companies and our investment strategies and adversely affect the profitability of our portfolio companies.

~~Risk Related Generally~~Since March 2018, the United States has imposed, or threatened to impose, a series of various tariffs on a variety of goods imported into the United States, with an emphasis on those imported from China and the EU. These new tariffs, or other changes in U.S. trade policy, have resulted in, and may continue to trigger, retaliatory actions by affected countries, particularly China. In October 2022, the United States Trade Representative (“USTR”) announced the public comment phase of its four-year, statutorily mandated review of the China Section 301 tariffs. Following the announcement, the USTR solicited additional information from interested parties in regard to their investigation. However, it is unclear if any tariffs will be removed, modified, or increased as a result of the investigation. The U.S. government has also implemented and expanded a number of economic sanctions programs and export controls that target Chinese entities and nationals on national security grounds, and has imposed restrictions on our ability to acquire and retain interests in the securities of certain Chinese entities.

Geopolitical tensions globally remain elevated and further changes to foreign direct investment laws remain possible. The U.S. government is advancing plans to create an outbound investment screening regime to prevent U.S. capital from contributing to the development of force-multiplying technologies in certain jurisdictions, such as China. Any governmental action, including such actions noted above, has the potential to increase costs, decrease margins, reduce the competitiveness of products and services offered by current and future portfolio companies and adversely affect the revenues and profitability of companies whose businesses rely on goods imported from or exported to any country impacted by such policies. In addition, these actions may adversely affect our suppliers and certain other customers of our portfolio companies, which could amplify the negative impact on our operating results or future cash flows.

Increasing scrutiny from stakeholders on ESG matters, including our ESG reporting, exposes us to reputational and other risks.

We, our funds and their portfolio companies face increasing public scrutiny related to ESG activities as well as ESG policies, processes and/or performance, including from fund investors, stockholders, regulators and other stakeholders. We and they risk damage to our ~~Business~~brand and reputation, if we or they fail or are perceived to have failed to act responsibly in a number of areas, such as diversity, equity and inclusion, environmental stewardship, support for local communities, corporate governance and transparency and considering ESG factors in our investment processes. In addition, different stakeholder groups have divergent views on ESG matters, including in the countries in which we operate and invest, as well as states and localities where we serve public sector clients. This divergence increases the risk that any action or lack thereof with respect to ESG matters will be perceived negatively by at least some stakeholders and adversely impact our reputation and business. If we do not successfully manage ESG-related expectations across the varied interests of our stakeholders, it could erode stakeholder trust, impact our reputation, and constrain our investment opportunities. Adverse incidents with respect to ESG activities or ESG policies, processes and/or performance, including any statements regarding the investment strategies of our funds or our funds’ ESG efforts or initiatives that are or are perceived to be inaccurate or misleading, could impact the value of our brand, or the brands of our funds or their portfolio companies, the cost of our or their operations and relationships with investors, all of which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Our failure to comply with investment guidelines set by our clients and limitations imposed by applicable law could result in damage awards against us and a loss of our assets under management, either of which could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.

Certain clients who retain us to manage assets on their behalf specify guidelines regarding investment allocation and strategy that we are required to follow in managing their portfolios. In addition, the boards of mutual funds we sub-advise generally establish similar guidelines regarding the investment of assets in those funds. We are also required to invest the mutual funds’ assets in accordance with limitations under the Investment Company Act, and applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. Our failure to comply with any of these guidelines and other limitations could result in losses to clients which, depending on the circumstances, could result in our obligation to make clients whole for such losses. If we believed that the circumstances did not justify a reimbursement, or clients believed the reimbursement we offered was insufficient, they could seek to recover damages from us, withdraw assets from our management or terminate their investment advisory agreement with us. Any of these events could harm our reputation and adversely affect our business.

Operational risks, including the threat of cyber-attacks, may disrupt our business, breach our clients’ security, result in losses or limit our growth.

We are heavily dependent on the capacity and reliability of the communications, information and technology systems supporting our operations, whether developed, owned and operated by us or by third parties. Operational risks, such as trading or operational errors or interruption of our financial, accounting, trading, compliance and other data processing systems, whether caused by the failure to prevent or mitigate data loss or other security breaches, or other cyber security threats or attacks, including breaches of our vendors’ technology and systems, fire or other natural disaster, power or telecommunications failure, act of terrorism or war or otherwise, could result in a disruption of our business, liability to clients, regulatory intervention or reputational damage, and thus have a material adverse effect on our business. Some types of operational risks, including, for example, trading errors, may be increased in periods of increased volatility, which can magnify the cost of an error. Cyber security risks relating to our business primarily involve the potential security breaches of our clients’ personal and financial information and illegal use thereof through system-wide “hacking” or other means. While we have never had any cyber security threat or attack on our technology systems, this may occur in the future.

Although we have back-up systems and cyber security and consumer protection measures in place, our back-up procedures, cyber defenses and capabilities in the event of a failure, interruption, or breach of security may not be adequate. Insurance and other safeguards we use may not be available or may only partially reimburse us for our losses related to operational failures or cyber-attacks. In addition, we may choose to reimburse a client in the event of a trading error or under other circumstances, even if we are not legally required to do so, and any such reimbursements could adversely affect our results of operations.

As a public company and as our client base, number of investment strategies and/or physical locations increase, developing and maintaining our operational systems and infrastructure and protecting our systems from cyber security attacks and threats may become increasingly challenging and costly, which could constrain our ability to expand our businesses. Any upgrades or expansions to our operations and/or technology to accommodate increased volumes of transactions or otherwise may require significant expenditures and may increase the probability that we will suffer system interruptions and failures. We also depend substantially on our New York office where a majority of our employees, administration and technology resources are located, for the continued operation of our business. Any significant disruption to that office could have a material adverse effect on us.

Improper disclosure of personal data could result in liability and harm our reputation.

We and our service providers store and process personal client information. It is possible that the security controls, training and other processes with respect to personal data may not prevent the improper disclosure of client information. Such disclosure could harm our reputation as well and subject us to liability, resulting in increased costs or loss of revenue.

Employee misconduct could expose us to significant legal liability and reputational harm.

We are vulnerable to reputational harm because we operate in an industry in which personal relationships, integrity and the confidence of our clients are of critical importance. Our employees may engage in misconduct that could subject us to regulatory sanctions and to suffer serious reputational harm (as a consequence of the negative perception resulting from such activities), which could adversely affect our financial position, client relationships and ability to attract new clients.

Our business often requires that we deal with confidential information. If our employees were to improperly use or disclose this information, even if inadvertently, we could be subject to legal action and suffer serious harm to our reputation, financial position and current and future business relationships. It is not always possible to deter employee misconduct, and the precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not always be effective. In addition, the SEC has increased its scrutiny of the use of non-public information obtained from corporate insiders by professional investors. Misconduct by our employees, or even unsubstantiated allegations of misconduct, could result in an adverse effect on our reputation and our business.

Failure to properly address conflicts of interest could harm our reputation, business and results of operations.

As we expand the scope of our business and our client base, we must continue to monitor and address any conflicts between our interests and those of our clients. The SEC and other regulators have increased their scrutiny of potential conflicts of interest, and we have implemented procedures and controls that we believe are reasonably designed to address these issues. However, appropriately dealing with conflicts of interest is complex, and if we fail, or appear to fail, to deal appropriately with conflicts of interest, we could face reputational damage, litigation or regulatory proceedings or penalties, any of which may adversely affect our results of operations.

The investment management industry faces substantial litigation risks that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations or cause significant reputational harm to us.

We depend on our network of relationships and on our reputation in order to attract and retain client assets. Our investment decisions could result in substantial losses to our clients. If our clients suffer significant losses or are otherwise dissatisfied with our services, we could be subject to legal liabilities or actions alleging negligent misconduct, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, unjust enrichment and/or fraud. These risks are often difficult to assess or quantify and their existence and magnitude often remain unknown for substantial periods of time, even after an action has been commenced. We may incur significant legal expenses in defending against litigation commenced by a client or regulatory authority. Substantial legal liability or significant regulatory action against us could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations or cause significant reputational harm to us.

The investment management industry is intensely competitive, and our ability to compete effectively could materially impact our results of operations. Competitiveness is based on various factors, including investment performance, investment management fee rates, continuity of investment professionals and client relationships, the quality of services provided to clients, reputation, continuity of selling arrangements with intermediaries and differentiated products. Several additional factors, including the following, increase our competitive risks:

Reductions in business sourced through third-party distribution channels, or their poor reviews of us or our products, could materially reduce our revenue and ability to attract new clients.

Accounts sourced through consultant-led searches have been key to our future growth. We also have accessed the high-net-worth segment of the investing community through relationships with well-respected wealth advisers who use our investment strategies in investment programs they construct for their clients. As of December 31, ~~2021~~2022 we had approximately ~~$5.1~~$5.8 billion in assets under management from third party distribution channels, which constituted approximately ~~16%~~20% of our total assets under management. Our failure to successfully maintain these third-party distribution channels could materially and adversely affect our business. In addition, poor reviews or evaluations by any of these parties, whether of a particular product or of us, could result in client withdrawals and impact our ability to attract new assets through such intermediaries.

A change of control could result in termination of our sub-investment advisory and investment advisory agreements.

Pursuant to the Advisers Act, each of our investment advisory agreements for the separate accounts we manage may not be assigned without the consent of the client. In addition, under the Investment Company Act, each of the investment advisory agreements with SEC registered mutual funds that we sub-advise automatically terminates in the event of its assignment. A sale of a controlling block of our voting securities and certain other transactions would be deemed an “assignment” pursuant to the Advisers Act and the Investment Company Act. Such an assignment may be deemed to occur in the event that the holders of the Class B units of Silvercrest L.P. exchange enough of their Class B units for shares of our Class A common stock and dispose of such shares of Class A common stock such that they no longer own a controlling interest in us, even if no other person or group acquires a controlling interest. If such a deemed assignment occurs, there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain the necessary consents from our clients and, unless the necessary approvals and consents are obtained, the deemed assignment could adversely affect our ability to continue managing client accounts, resulting in the loss of assets under management and a corresponding loss of revenue.

If our techniques for managing risk are ineffective, we may be exposed to material unanticipated losses.

In order to manage the significant risks inherent in our business, we must maintain effective policies, procedures and systems that enable us to identify, monitor and control our exposure to operational, legal and reputational risks. Our risk management methods may prove to be ineffective due to their design, implementation or insufficient scope, or as a result of the lack of adequate, accurate or timely information or otherwise. If our risk management efforts are ineffective, we could suffer losses that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or operating results. Additionally, we could be subject to litigation, particularly from our clients, and sanctions or fines from regulators or self-regulatory organizations. Our techniques for managing risks in client portfolios may not fully mitigate the risk exposure in all economic or market environments, or against all types of risk, including risks that we might fail to identify or anticipate.

Our reliance on prime brokers, custodians, administrators and other agents subjects us to certain risks relating to their execution of transactions and their solvency, and the failure by or insolvency of, any such person could adversely affect our business and financial performance.

Our business generally depends on the services of prime brokers, custodians, administrators and other agents to carry out securities transactions. For example, in the event of the insolvency of a prime broker and/or custodian, our funds might not be able to recover equivalent assets in full as they will rank among the prime broker’s and custodian’s unsecured creditors in relation to assets, which the prime broker or a custodian borrows, lends or otherwise uses. In addition, our funds’ cash held with a prime broker or a custodian will not be segregated from the prime broker’s or custodian’s own cash, and our funds will therefore rank as unsecured creditors in relation thereto.

If we incur indebtedness or issue senior equity securities, we will be exposed to additional risks, including the typical risks associated with leverage.

The amount of leverage that we employ will depend on our board of directors’ assessment of market and other factors at the time of any proposed borrowing. We may also use leverage to make certain investments. There is no assurance that a leveraging strategy will be successful. Leverage involves risks and special considerations that include the following:

In addition, the credit facility entered into in June 2013, as explained below, by all of the subsidiaries of Silvercrest L.P. and guaranteed by Silvercrest L.P. contains financial and other restrictive covenants, including restrictions on distributions, incurrence of additional indebtedness, mergers and certain other dispositions of our business and sale of assets.

Any requirement that we sell assets at a loss to redeem or pay interest on any leverage or for other reasons would reduce our equity value and also make it difficult for our net asset value to recover. Our board of directors, in its best judgment, nevertheless may determine to use leverage if it expects that the benefits to our common stockholders of maintaining the leveraged position will outweigh the risks. General interest rate fluctuations may have a substantial negative impact on our investments and investment opportunities. In addition, an increase in interest rates would make it more expensive for us to use debt to finance these investments.

~~The interest rates under our credit agreement may be impacted by the phase-out of the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”).~~32

LIBOR is the basic rate of interest used in lending between banks on the London interbank market and is widely used as a reference for setting the interest rates on loans globally. We use LIBOR as a reference rate to calculate interest under certain borrowings under our credit facility. In 2017, the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates LIBOR, announced that it intends to phase out LIBOR by the end of 2021. The U.S. Federal Reserve, in conjunction with the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, a steering committee comprised of large U.S. financial institutions, identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) as the preferred alternative reference rate to U.S. dollar LIBOR and recommended a paced transition plan that involves the creation of a reference rate based on SOFR by the end of 2021. SOFR is a more generic measure than LIBOR and considers the cost of borrowing cash overnight, collateralized by U.S. Treasury securities. Given the inherent differences between LIBOR and SOFR or any other alternative benchmark rate that may be established, there are many uncertainties regarding a transition from LIBOR. Our credit facility contains a fallback provision providing for alternative rate calculations in the event LIBOR is unavailable, prior to any LIBOR rate transition. As a result, our level of interest payments we incur may change and the new rates we incur may not be as favorable to us as those in effect prior to any LIBOR phase-out.

Future financings could adversely affect us and our common stockholders by diluting existing stockholders or by placing restrictions on our ability to run our business, including making distributions to unitholders.

The subsidiaries of Silvercrest L.P. entered into a credit facility in June 2013, which was amended in July 2019, pursuant to which the subsidiaries of Silvercrest L.P. will be able to borrow up to $25.5 million in principal amount from time to time for working capital needs and other purposes. Although we believe that available borrowings under our credit facility and future cash flow from operations will be sufficient to meet our working capital requirements for normal operations pursuant to our business plan, these sources of capital may not fully fund our growth strategy in the immediate future. If we decide to pursue future acquisitions, we may draw down proceeds from our existing credit facilities and then raise additional capital through the incurrence of long-term or short-term indebtedness or the issuance of additional equity securities in private or public transactions. This could result in dilution of existing common stockholders’ equity positions, increased interest expense and decreased net income. In addition, significant capital requirements associated with such investments may impair our ability to make distributions to our Class A common stockholders.

Newly enacted laws or regulations and future changes in the taxation of businesses may impact our effective tax rate or may adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Newly enacted laws or regulations, and future changes in the taxation of businesses, may impact our effective tax rate or may adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. For example, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, enacted on December 22, 2017, reduced the corporate income tax rate to 21%, further limited the deductibility of business interest expense, and restricted the use of net operating loss carryforwards arising in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2018. We cannot predict how changes in the laws or regulations, other guidance issued pursuant to such changes, or conforming or non-conforming state tax rules might affect us or our business. In addition, there can be no assurance that tax laws, including the U.S. corporate income tax rate, would not undergo significant changes in the near future.

The market price and trading volume of our Class A common stock may be volatile, which could result in rapid and substantial losses for our stockholders.

The market price of our Class A common stock may be highly volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations. Moreover, the trading volume of our Class A common stock may fluctuate and cause significant price variations to occur. If the market price of our Class A common stock declines significantly, you may be unable to sell your shares of Class A common stock at or above the price at which you purchased it, if at all. The market price of our Class A common stock may fluctuate or decline significantly in the future. Some of the factors that could negatively affect the price of our Class A common stock, or result in fluctuations in the price or trading volume of our Class A common stock, include:

Future issuances and sales of our Class A common stock in the public market could lower our stock price, and any additional capital raised by us through the sale of equity or convertible securities may dilute your ownership in us.

The market price of our Class A common stock could decline as a result of sales of a large number of shares of our Class A common stock available for sale, or the perception that such sales could occur. These sales, or the possibility that these sales may occur, also may make it more difficult for us to raise additional capital by selling equity securities in the future, at a time and price that we deem appropriate.

We have ~~9,869,101~~9,559,587 shares of our Class A common stock outstanding as of February 25, ~~2022.~~2023. The shares of Class A common stock that will be issuable upon exchange of Class B units held by our principals may only be sold in the manner and at the times described in our exchange agreement with our principals. For so long as a principal remains employed by us, during any 12-month period, each principal and his permitted transferees (e.g., family trusts) may collectively exchange vested Class B units that equal 20% of the Class B units such persons collectively held at the beginning of such 12-month period, subject to certain exceptions described under the second amended and restated limited partnership agreement of Silvercrest L.P. Upon a termination of employment other than due to retirement or for cause, all Class B units held by a principal, other than those Class B units forfeited under certain circumstances, will be exchanged automatically for shares of Class A common stock. The shares of Class A common stock received upon exchange for Class B units held by our principals may be sold (i) at any time and in any manner by retired employees and employees or estates of employees terminated due to death or disability, (ii) for any principal whose employment is terminated by us without cause, in an amount equal to 50% of the total shares of Class A common stock held by the principal at the time of termination of employment less any amounts sold for taxes in each 12-month period following the 18-month anniversary of the date of termination of employment, and (iii) for any principal who voluntarily resigns his employment, in an amount equal to one-third of the total shares of Class A common stock held by the principal at the time of termination of employment less any amounts sold for taxes in each 12-month period following the 18-month anniversary of the date of resignation of employment subject to manner of sale restrictions. The estate of our former Chief Executive Officer may sell portions or all of its Class A common shares in Silvercrest in order to diversify its portfolio.

As of December 31, ~~2021,~~2022, we have reserved for issuance ~~192,689~~1,140,265 shares of our Class A common stock pursuant to, upon the exercise of options or other equity awards granted under, or upon exchange of Class B units granted under, our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. We may increase the number of shares registered for this purpose from time to time. Once we register these additional shares, they will be able to be sold in the public market upon issuance.

We cannot predict the size of future issuances of our Class A common stock or the effect, if any, that future issuances and sales of shares of our Class A common stock may have on the market price of our Class A common stock. Sales or distributions of substantial amounts of our Class A common stock (including shares issued in connection with an acquisition), or the perception that such sales could occur, may cause the market price of our Class A common stock to decline.

Stockholders will experience further dilution upon issuance of restricted Class B units or restricted shares of our Class A common stock, or upon the grant of options or equity awards to purchase Class B units or shares of our Class A common stock, in each case under our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan.

The requirements of being a public company may strain our resources and distract our management, which could make it difficult to manage our ~~business, particularly since we are no longer an “emerging growth company.”~~business.

As a public company, we are required to comply with various regulatory and reporting requirements, including those required by the SEC. Complying with these reporting and other regulatory requirements is time-consuming and results in increased costs to us and could have a negative effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and requirements of Sarbanes Oxley. These requirements may place a strain on our systems and resources. The Exchange Act requires that we file annual, quarterly and current reports with respect to our business and financial condition. Sarbanes Oxley requires that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting. To maintain and improve the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, we need to commit significant resources, hire additional staff and provide additional management oversight. We have implemented additional procedures and processes for the purpose of addressing the standards and requirements applicable to public companies. Sustaining our growth also will require us to commit additional management, operational and financial resources to identify new professionals to join our company and to maintain appropriate operational and financial systems to adequately support our expansion. In addition, as a public company, we have enhanced our investor relations, legal and corporate communications functions. All of these activities and additional efforts may increase our costs, strain our resources and divert management’s attention from other business concerns, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

For so long as we remained an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act, we were able to take advantage of certain temporary exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies, including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of Sarbanes Oxley (and rules and regulations of the SEC thereunder, which we refer to as Section 404) and reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements and exemptions from holding a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation . Since we are no longer an emerging growth company, we expect to incur additional expenses and devote increased management effort toward ensuring compliance with those requirements applicable to companies that are not emerging growth companies. Even though we no longer qualify as an emerging growth company, we currently do, and may continue to, qualify as a “smaller reporting company” which allows us to take advantage of many of the same exemptions from disclosure requirements. However, we cannot be certain we will continue to so qualify or predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive because we may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our Class A common stock depends in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. If one or more of the analysts who covers us downgrades our stock or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of us or fails to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our stock could decrease, which could cause our stock price and trading volume to decline.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a negative impact on our revenue ~~levels, which we expect to continue into 2022.~~levels.

Our revenue is highly correlated to securities markets, and we expect that our assets under management and revenue levels will be negatively impacted, on an incremental basis, by the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on securities markets. ~~While the COVID-19 pandemic did not materially affect the Company’s financial results and business operations in the Company’s first fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2020, economic~~Economic and health conditions in the United States and across most of the globe ~~have~~ changed rapidly ~~since the end of the first quarter,~~in 2020, which ~~has~~ led to increased volatility and uncertainty in securities markets in the United States and across the globe. As a result, the COVID-19 pandemic affected our operations in each of the ~~second quarter ended June 30,~~quarters during the period April 1, 2020 through the ~~fourth~~ quarter ended December 31, ~~2021,~~2022, and may continue to do so indefinitely thereafter. While demand for the Company’s services continues given the current capital markets and overall economic environment, such demand may not continue and demand may decrease from historical levels depending on ~~the duration and severity~~a variety of factors related to the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the ~~length~~risk of time it takes for normal economic and operating conditions to resume, additional governmental actions that may be taken and/or extensions of time for restrictions that have been imposed to date, and numerous other uncertainties.resurgence. Such events may result in business disruption, reduced earnings and operations, any of which could materially affect our business, financial condition, ~~and results of operations.~~

The transmission of COVID-19 and efforts to contain its spread have resulted in border closings and other travel restrictions and significant disruptions to business operations, supply chains and customer activity, including event cancellations and restrictions, service cancellations and wide-spread quarantines. These impacts and the uncertainty around the future impact of COVID-19, including the extent and duration of the impact on economies around the world, have caused significant volatility and declines in the global financial markets, which are expected to continue to result in business disruptions, reduced earnings and operations, which could materially affect our business, financial conditions and results of operations.

The Company cannot predict the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on its clients, vendors, and other business partners.

The COVID-19 pandemic is affecting the Company’s clients, vendors, and other business partners, but the Company is not able to assess the full extent of the current impact nor predict the ultimate consequences that will result therefrom. We are working to obtain information about and maintain communications with our clients, vendors and business partners to coordinate efforts related to business continuity which may mitigate some, but not all, of the adverse effects resulting from the pandemic. If the Company’s clients, vendors and business partners are impacted by the pandemic for an extended period of time, the Company’s earnings and operations may be negatively impacted as well.

The amount and mix of our AUM are subject to significant fluctuations, and a shift in our asset mix toward lower-fee products may negatively impact our revenues and income.

Fluctuations in the amount and mix of our AUM may be attributable in part to market conditions outside of our control that have had, and in the future could have, a negative impact on our revenues and income. The level of our revenues depends largely on the level and relative mix of AUM. Our investment management fee revenues are based primarily on a percentage of AUM and vary with the nature and strategies of our products. Any decrease in the value or amount of our AUM because of market volatility or other factors, such as asset outflows or a decline in the price of stocks, in particular market segments or in the securities market generally, negatively impacts our revenues and income. Changing market conditions and investor preferences may cause a shift in our asset mix toward certain lower fee products, such as fixed income products and ETFs, and away from higher fee equity and multi-asset products, which may cause a related decline in our revenues and income. In addition, increases in interest rates, particularly if rapid, as well as uncertainty in

the future direction of interest rates, may have a negative impact on our fixed income products and decrease the total return on bond investments due to lower market valuations of existing bonds. Moreover, we generally derive higher investment management and distribution fees from our international products than from our U.S. products, and higher sales fees from our U.S. products than from our international products. Changing market conditions may cause a shift in our asset mix.

The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has, and will likely continue to, negatively impact the global economy and may have a material adverse effect on our business, operations and financial results.

The military conflict in Ukraine and the ongoing geopolitical tensions have created significant volatility, uncertainty and economic disruption. The United States, European Union and other countries have announced economic sanctions against Russia. While it has not had a material adverse effect on our business, operations and financial results, the extent to which the conflict impacts our business, operations and financial results going forward will depend on numerous evolving factors that we may not be able to accurately predict, including: the duration and scope of the conflict, governmental and business actions that have been and continue to be taken in response to the conflict, the impact of the conflict on economic activity and any retaliatory actions taken by Russia.

Our corporate headquarters are located at 1330 Avenue of the Americas, 38th Floor, New York, New York 10019, where we occupy approximately 41,000 square feet of space under a lease, the extended terms of which expire on September 30, 2028. We also lease space for our other seven offices. We believe our current facilities are adequate for our current needs and that suitable additional space will be available as and when needed.

We are, and will continue to be, subject to litigation from time to time in the ordinary course of business. Currently, there are no material legal proceedings pending or threatened against us.

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our Class A common stock has been listed on The Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “SAMG” since June 27, 2013. Our Class B common stock is not listed on The Nasdaq Global Market and there is no established trading market for such shares.

The following table presents information with respect to purchases of our Class A common stock made during the quarter ended December 31, ~~2021.~~2022.


Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid Per Share	Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased under the Plan or Program	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid Per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased under the Plan or Program
October 1 - December 31	5,886	$	15.97	33,083	$	14,487,749		190,190	$	18.61		508,782	$	5,705,109
Total	5,886	$	15.97	33,083	$	14,487,749		190,190	$	18.61		508,782	$	5,705,109

As of February 25, ~~2022,~~2023, there were five holders of record of our Class A common stock and 58 holders of record of our Class B common stock. A substantially greater number of holders of our Class A common stock are held in “street name” and held of record by banks, brokers and other financial institutions.


					(c)
					Number of
	(a)				securities remaining
	Number of				available for future
	securities to be		(b)		issuance
	issued		Weighted-average		under equity
	upon exercise of		exercise price of		compensation plans
	outstanding		outstanding		(excluding
	options, warrants		options, warrants		securities reflected
Plan Category	and rights		and rights		in column (a))		(a) Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights		(b) Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights		(c) Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders		445,462	$	13.16		192,689		497,804	$	14.33		1,140,265
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total		445,462	$	13.16		192,689		497,804	$	14.33		1,140,265

A total of 1,670,960 shares of Class A common stock were initially registered and an additional 1,050,000 were added when the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan was amended in June 2022, 966,510 restricted stock units were granted in August 2015, 14,373 restricted stock units were granted in May 2016, 105,398 non-qualified stock options were granted in October 2018, 60,742 non-qualified stock options were granted in May 2019, 34,388 restricted stock units were granted in May 2019, 8,242 restricted stock units were granted in March 2020, 86,764 non-qualified stock options were granted in May 2020, 49,116 restricted stock units were granted in May 2020, 21,598 restricted stock units were granted in January 2021, 129,314 restricted stock units were granted in May 2021, 1,827 restricted stock units were granted in August 2021, 10,270 restricted stock units were granted in May 2022, 92,154 restricted stock units were granted in November 2022 and ~~192,689~~1,140,265 remain reserved for issuance under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan as of December 31, ~~2021.~~2022.

As a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to provide this information.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This report contains forward-looking statements relating to present or future trends or factors that are subject to risks and uncertainties. These risks include, but are not limited to: specific and overall impacts of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on our financial condition and results of operations; our ability to achieve our business objectives; our ability to successfully achieve the anticipated results of strategic transactions, including the integration of the operations of acquired assets and businesses; the retention and development of clients and other business relationships; disruptions or delays in our business operations, including without limitation disruptions or delays arising from political unrest, war, labor strikes, natural disasters, public health crises such as the coronavirus pandemic, and other events and circumstances beyond our control; our ability to control costs; general economic conditions; fluctuation in operating results; changes in the securities markets; our ability to maintain compliance with the terms of our credit facility; the availability, integration and effective operation of information systems and other technology, and the potential interruption of such systems or technology; risks related to data security of privacy breaches; and other risks detailed from time to time in our filings with the SEC. Our future financial performance could differ materially from the expectations of management contained herein. Additionally, many of these risks and uncertainties are currently elevated by and may or will continue to be elevated by the COVID-19 pandemic. It is not possible to predict or identify all such risks, but may become material in the future. We undertake no obligation to release revisions to these forward-looking statements after the date of this report.

We are a full-service wealth management firm focused on providing financial advisory and related family office services to ultra-high net worth individuals and institutional investors. In addition to a wide range of investment capabilities, we offer a full suite of complementary and customized family office services for families seeking a comprehensive oversight of their financial affairs. During the twelve months ended December 31, ~~2021,~~2022, our assets under management ~~increased 16.2%~~decreased 10.5% from ~~$27.8~~$32.3 billion to ~~$32.3~~$28.9 billion. ~~On July 1, 2019, we acquired $1.7 billion of assets under management in connection with the acquisition of Cortina Asset Management LLC (“Cortina” and “Cortina Acquisition”).~~

The business includes the management of funds of funds, and other investment funds, collectively referred to as the “Silvercrest Funds”. Silvercrest L.P. has issued restricted stock units exercisable for ~~170,854.~~212,927. Class B units which entitle the holders thereof to receive distributions from Silvercrest L.P. to the same extent as if the underlying Class B units were outstanding. Net profits and net losses of Silvercrest L.P. will be allocated, and distributions from Silvercrest L.P. will be made, to its current partners pro rata in accordance with their respective partnership units (and assuming the Class B units underlying all restricted stock units are outstanding).

The historical results of operations discussed in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations include those of Silvercrest L.P. and its subsidiaries. As the general partner of Silvercrest L.P., we control its business and affairs and, therefore, consolidate its financial position and results with ours. The interests of the limited partners’ collective ~~32.9%~~32.6% partnership interest in Silvercrest L.P. as of December 31, ~~2021~~2022 are reflected in non-controlling interests in our consolidated financial statements.

This Item 7 generally discusses 2022 and 2021 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2022 and 2021. Discussions of 2020 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2021 and ~~2020. Discussions of 2019 items and year-to-year comparisons between~~ 2020 ~~and 2019~~ that are not included in this Form 10-K can be found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2020~~2021 filed with the SEC on March ~~4, 2021.~~2, 2022.

The emergence of the coronavirus (COVID-19) around the world, and particularly in the United States, presents significant risks to us, not all of which we are able to fully evaluate or foresee at the current time. While the COVID-19 pandemic did not materially affect our financial results and business operations in the first fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2020, economic and health conditions in the United States and across most of the globe changed rapidly since the end of the first quarter 2020 and into the second fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2020. Demand for our services continues despite the current capital markets and overall economic environment. Such current demand may not continue and/or demand may decrease from historical levels depending on the duration and severity of the COVID-19 pandemic, the length of time it takes for normal economic and operating conditions to resume, additional governmental actions that may be taken and/or extensions of time for restrictions that have been imposed to date, and numerous other uncertainties.

The COVID-19 pandemic affected our operations in each of the ~~six~~ quarters during the period April 1, 2020 through December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and may continue to do so indefinitely thereafter. All of these factors may have far reaching impacts on our business, operations, and financial results and conditions, directly and indirectly, including without limitation impacts on the health of our

management and employees, client behavior, and on the overall economy. The scope and nature of these impacts, most of which are beyond our control, continue to evolve, and the outcomes of these impacts are uncertain.

Our revenue is highly correlated to securities markets. As a result, we expect that our assets under management and revenue levels will be negatively impacted, on an incremental basis, by the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on securities markets. The decrease in assets under management for the three months ended March 31, 2020 had an impact on our revenue for the second quarter ended June 30, 2020 because most of our revenue is billed in advance based on the value of assets under management on the last day of the preceding calendar quarter. We continue to fully operate with our management and employees working remotely and we have had business continuity plans in place which we were able to seamlessly activate upon actions taken by various governmental authorities suggesting that businesses recommend that their employees work from home as a result of the pandemic.

Due to the above circumstances and as described generally in this Form 10-K, management cannot predict the full impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s earnings and operations nor to economic conditions generally. The ultimate extent of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company is highly uncertain and will depend on future developments, and such effects could exist for an extended period of time even after the pandemic might end.


	For the Years Ended December 31,									For the Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands except as indicated)	2021			2020			2019			2022			2021			2020
Revenue	$	131,603		$	107,983		$	102,152		$	123,217		$	131,603		$	107,983
Income before other income (expense), net	$	30,521		$	22,281		$	18,873		$	38,562		$	30,521		$	22,281
Net income	$	24,946		$	17,478		$	15,412		$	30,793		$	24,946		$	17,478
Net income margin		19.0	%		16.2	%		15.1	%		25.0	%		19.0	%		16.2	%
Net income attributable to Silvercrest	$	14,693		$	9,960		$	8,646		$	18,828		$	14,693		$	9,960
Adjusted EBITDA (1)	$	43,441		$	30,296		$	28,592		$	32,021		$	43,441		$	30,296
Adjusted EBITDA margin (2)		33.0	%		28.1	%		28.0	%		26.0	%		33.0	%		28.1	%
Assets under management at period end (billions)	$	32.3		$	27.8		$	25.1		$	28.9		$	32.3		$	27.8
Average assets under management (billions) (3)	$	30.1		$	26.5		$	22.1		$	30.6		$	30.1		$	26.5

We generate revenue from management and advisory fees, performance fees and family office services fees. Our management and advisory fees are generated by managing assets on behalf of separate accounts and acting as investment adviser for various investment funds. Our performance fees relate to assets managed in external investment strategies in which we have a revenue sharing arrangement and in funds in which we have no partnership interest. Our management and advisory fees and family office services fees income is recognized through the course of the period in which these services are provided. Income from performance fees is recorded at the conclusion of the contractual performance period when all contingencies are resolved. In certain arrangements, we are only entitled to receive performance fees and allocations when the return on assets under management exceeds certain benchmark returns or other performance targets.

The discretionary investment management agreements for our separately managed accounts do not have a specified term. Rather, each agreement may be terminated by either party at any time, unless otherwise agreed with the client, upon written notice of termination to the other party. The investment management agreements for our private funds are generally in effect from year to year, and may be terminated at the end of any year (or, in certain cases, on the anniversary of execution of the agreement) (i) by us upon 30 or 90 days’ prior written notice and (ii) after receiving the affirmative vote of a specified percentage of the investors in the private funds that are not affiliated with us, by the private fund on 60 or 90 days’ prior written notice. The investment management agreements for our private funds may also generally be terminated effective immediately by either party where the non-terminating party (i) commits a material breach of the terms subject, in certain cases, to a cure period, (ii) is found to have committed fraud, gross negligence or willful misconduct or (iii) becomes bankrupt, becomes insolvent or dissolves. Each of our investment management agreements contains customary indemnification obligations from us to our clients. The tables below set forth the amount of assets under management, the percentage of management and advisory fees revenues, the amount of revenue recognized, and the average assets under management for discretionary managed accounts and for private funds for each period presented.


	As of and for the Year Ended December 31,									As of and for the Year Ended December 31,
(in billions)	2021			2020			2019			2022			2021			2020
AUM concentrated in Discretionary Managed Accounts	$	24.6		$	20.2		$	18.3		$	20.5		$	24.6		$	20.2
Average AUM For Discretionary Managed Accounts	$	22.4		$	19.3		$	16.0		$	22.6		$	22.4		$	19.3
Discretionary Managed Accounts Revenue (in millions)	$	122.3		$	99.1		$	92.9		$	114.3		$	122.3		$	99.1
Percentage of management and advisory fees revenue		96	%		96	%		95	%		96	%		96	%		96	%


	As of and for the Year Ended December 31,									As of and for the Year Ended December 31,
(in billions)	2021			2020			2019			2022			2021			2020
AUM concentrated in Private Funds	$	0.5		$	0.4		$	0.5		$	0.4		$	0.5		$	0.4
Average AUM For Private Funds	$	0.5		$	0.5		$	0.5		$	0.5		$	0.5		$	0.5
Private Funds Revenue (in millions)	$	4.7		$	4.6		$	5.1		$	4.4		$	4.7		$	4.6
Percentage of management and advisory fees revenue		4	%		4	%		5	%		4	%		4	%		4	%

Our management and advisory fees are primarily driven by the level of our assets under management. Our assets under management increase or decrease based on the net inflows or outflows of funds into our various investment strategies and the investment performance of our clients’ accounts. In order to increase our assets under management and expand our business, we must develop and market investment strategies that suit the investment needs of our target clients and provide attractive returns over the long term. Our ability to continue to attract clients will depend on a variety of factors including, among others:

The majority of management and advisory fees that we earn on separately-managed accounts are based on the value of assets under management on the last day of each calendar quarter. Most of our management and advisory fees are billed quarterly in advance on the first day of each calendar quarter. Our basic annual fee schedule for management of clients’ assets in separately managed accounts is: (i) for managed equity or balanced portfolios, 1% of the first $10 million and 0.60% on the balance, (ii) for managed fixed income only portfolios, 0.40% on the first $10 million and 0.30% on the balance, (iii) for the municipal value strategy, 0.65%, (iv) for Cortina’s equity portfolios, 1% on the first $25 million, 0.90% on the next $50 million and 0.80% on the balance and (v) for outsourced chief investment officer portfolios, 0.40% on the first $50 million, 0.32% on the next $50 million and 0.24% on the balance. Our fee for monitoring non-discretionary assets can range from 0.05% to 0.01%, but can also be incorporated into an agreed-upon fixed family office service fee. The majority of our client relationships pay a blended fee rate because they are invested in multiple strategies.

Management fees earned on investment funds that we advise are calculated primarily based on the net assets of the funds. Some funds calculate investment fees based on the net assets of the funds as of the last business day of each calendar quarter, whereas other funds calculate investment fees based on the value of net assets on the first business day of the month. Depending on the investment fund, fees are paid either quarterly in advance or quarterly in arrears. For our private funds, the fees range from 0.25% to 1.5% annually. Certain management fees earned on investment funds for which we perform risk management and due diligence services are based on flat fee agreements customized for each engagement.

Average annual management fee is calculated by dividing our actual revenue earned over a period by our average assets under management during the same period (which is calculated by averaging quarter-end assets under management for the applicable period). Our average management fee was ~~0.44%~~0.40%, ~~0.41%~~0.44% and ~~0.46%~~0.41% for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019,~~2020, respectively. Changes in our total average management fee rates are typically the result of changes in the mix of our assets under management and increased concentration in our equities strategies whose fee rates are higher than those of other investment strategies. Advisory fees are also adjusted for any cash flows into or out of a portfolio, where the cash flow represents greater than 10% of the previous quarter-end market value of the portfolio. These cash flow-related adjustments were insignificant for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019.~~2020. Silvercrest L.P. has authority to take fees directly from external custodian accounts of its separately managed accounts.

Our management and advisory fees may fluctuate based on a number of factors, including the following:

Our family office services capabilities enable us to provide comprehensive and integrated services to our clients. Our dedicated group of tax and financial planning professionals provide financial planning, tax planning and preparation, partnership accounting and fund administration, and consolidated wealth reporting, among other services. Family office services income fluctuates based on both the number of clients for whom we perform these services and the level of agreed-upon fees, most of which are flat fees. Therefore, non-discretionary assets under management, which are associated with family office services, do not typically serve as the basis for the amount of family office services revenue that is recognized.

Our expenses consist primarily of compensation and benefits expenses, as well as general and administrative expense including rent, professional services fees, data-related costs and sub-advisory fees. These expenses may fluctuate due to a number of factors, including the following:

Our largest expense is compensation and benefits, which includes the salaries, bonuses, equity-based compensation and related benefits and payroll costs attributable to our principals and employees. Our compensation methodology is intended to meet the following objectives: (i) support our overall business strategy; (ii) attract, retain and motivate top-tier professionals within the investment management industry; and (iii) align our employees’ interests with those of our equity owners. We have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, a general rise in compensation and benefits expense commensurate with growth in headcount and with the need to maintain competitive compensation levels.

The components of our compensation and benefits expenses for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019~~2020 are as follows:


	For the Year Ended December 31,						For the Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)	2021		2020		2019		2022		2021		2020
Cash compensation and benefits (1)	$	71,138	$	61,720	$	57,766	$	70,461	$	71,138	$	61,720
Non-cash equity-based compensation expense		1,426		659		2,272		1,149		1,426		659
Total compensation expense	$	72,564	$	62,379	$	60,038	$	71,610	$	72,564	$	62,379

During 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019,~~2020, Silvercrest L.P. granted restricted stock units (“RSU”) to existing Class B unit holders. During 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019,~~2020, Silvercrest L.P. granted non-qualified options (“NQO”) to an existing Class B unit holder. Information regarding restricted stock units can be found in Note 16. ~~“Equity Based~~“Equity-Based Compensation” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in ~~“— Item~~“Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this filing.

General and administrative expenses include occupancy-related costs, professional and outside services fees, office expenses, depreciation and amortization, sub-advisory fees and the costs associated with operating and maintaining our research, trading and portfolio accounting systems. Our costs associated with operating and maintaining our research, trading and portfolio accounting systems and professional services expenses generally increase or decrease in relative proportion to the number of employees retained by us and the overall size and scale of our business operations. Sub-advisory fees will fluctuate based on the level of management fees from funds that utilize sub-advisors.

Other income is derived primarily from investment income arising from our investments in various private investment funds that were established as part of our investment strategies. We expect the investment components of other income, in the aggregate, to fluctuate based on market conditions and the success of our investment strategies. Performance fees earned from those investment funds in which we have a partnership interest have been earned over the past few years as a result of the achievement of various high water marks depending on the investment fund. These performance fees are recorded based on the equity method of accounting. The majority of our performance fees over the past few years have been earned from our fixed income-related funds.

We are the general partner of Silvercrest L.P. and control its business and affairs and, therefore, consolidate its financial results with ours. In light of the limited partners’ interests in Silvercrest L.P., we reflect their partnership interests as non-controlling interests in our consolidated financial statements.

We are subject to taxes applicable to C-corporations. Our effective tax rate, and the absolute dollar amount of our tax expense, will be offset by the benefits of the tax receivable agreement entered into with our Class B stockholders.

On April 12, 2019, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Cortina Asset Management, LLC, a Wisconsin limited liability company (“Cortina”), and certain interest holders of Cortina (the “Principals”) to acquire, directly or through a designated affiliate, substantially all of the assets of Cortina relating to Cortina’s business of providing investment management, investment advisory, and related services.

Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Purchase Agreement, we agreed to pay to Cortina an aggregate maximum amount of $44.9 million, 80% of which was agreed to be paid in cash at closing by us, and 20% of which was agreed to be paid by us in the form of issuance and delivery to certain Principals at closing of Class B Units in Silvercrest L.P., in each case subject to certain adjustments as described in the Purchase Agreement. In addition, the Purchase Agreement provides for up to an additional $26.2 million to be paid 80% in cash with certain Principals receiving the remaining 20% in the form of Class B Units of Silvercrest L.P. in potential earn-out payments over the next four years.

On July 1, 2019, the acquisition was completed pursuant to the Purchase Agreement. At closing, the Company paid to Cortina an aggregate principal amount of $33.6 million in cash, and Silvercrest L.P. paid an additional $9.0 million in the form of issuance and delivery to certain Principals of 662,713 Class B Units in Silvercrest L.P. Of the $33.6 million paid in cash, $35.1 million represented consideration, partially offset by net closing credits due to the Company for reimbursable expenses from Cortina.

In addition, the Purchase Agreement provides for up to an additional $26.2 million to be paid 80% in cash with certain Principals of Cortina receiving the remaining 20% in the form of Class B Units of Silvercrest L.P. in potential earn-out payments over the next four years.

The foregoing description of the Purchase Agreement is only a summary, does not purport to be complete, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Purchase Agreement, which is attached as Exhibit 2.1 to the Form 8-K filed by Silvercrest on April 15, 2019.

On December 13, 2018, we executed an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Neosho Asset Purchase Agreement”) by and among the Company, Silvercrest L.P. (“SLP”), Silvercrest Asset Management Group LLC (“SAMG LLC”) and Neosho Capital LLC (“Neosho” or the “Seller”), and Christopher K. Richey, Alphonse I. Chan, Robert K. Choi and Vincent G. Pandes, each such individual a principal of Neosho, to acquire certain assets of Neosho. The transaction contemplated by the Neosho Asset Purchase Agreement closed on January 15, 2019 and is referred to herein as the “Neosho Acquisition”.

Information regarding the Cortina and Neosho Acquisitions can be found in Note 3. “Acquisitions” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in ~~“— Item~~“Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this filing.

Our revenues for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019~~2020 are set forth below:


	For the Years Ended December 31,									For the Years Ended December 31,
(in thousands)	2021		2020		2021 vs. 2020 ($)		2021 vs. 2020 (%)			2022		2021		2022 vs. 2021 ($)			2022 vs. 2021 (%)
Management and advisory fees	$	126,976	$	103,775	$	23,201		22.4	%	$	118,725	$	126,976	$	(8,251	)		(6.5	)%
Performance fees and allocations		86		—		86		100.0	%		2		86		(84	)		(97.7	)%
Family office services		4,541		4,208		333		7.9	%		4,490		4,541		(51	)		(1.1	)%
Total revenue	$	131,603	$	107,983	$	23,620		21.9	%	$	123,217	$	131,603	$	(8,386	)		(6.4	)%


	For the Years Ended December 31,										For the Years Ended December 31,
(in thousands)	2020		2019		2020 vs. 2019 ($)			2020 vs. 2019 (%)			2021		2020		2021 vs. 2020 ($)		2021 vs. 2020 (%)
Management and advisory fees	$	103,775	$	97,970	$	5,805			5.9	%	$	126,976	$	103,775	$	23,201		22.4	%
Performance fees and allocations		—		25		(25	)		-100.0	%		86		—		86		100.0	%
Family office services		4,208		4,157		51			1.2	%		4,541		4,208		333		7.9	%
Total revenue	$	107,983	$	102,152	$	5,831			5.7	%	$	131,603	$	107,983	$	23,620		21.9	%

The growth in our assets under management from January 1, ~~2019~~2020 to December 31, ~~2021~~2022 is described below:


	Assets Under Management									Assets Under Management
(in billions)	Discretionary			Non- Discretionary			Total			Discretionary			Non- Discretionary			Total
As of January 1, 2019	$	14.2		$	4.8		$	19.0	(1)

As of January 1, 2020										$	18.8		$	6.3		$	25.1		(1)
Gross client inflows		10.4			0.6			11.0			3.8			0.4			4.2
Gross client outflows		(8.7	)		(0.4	)		(9.1	)		(3.5	)		(0.3	)		(3.8	)
Net client flows		1.7			0.2			1.9			0.3			0.1			0.4

Market appreciation		2.9			1.3			4.2			1.5			0.8			2.3
As of December 31, 2019	$	18.8		$	6.3		$	25.1	(1)

As of December 31, 2020										$	20.6		$	7.2		$	27.8		(1)
Gross client inflows		3.8			0.4			4.2			5.7			0.5			6.2
Gross client outflows		(3.5	)		(0.3	)		(3.8	)		(5.5	)		(0.5	)		(6.0	)
Net client flows		0.3			0.1			0.4			0.2			—			0.2

Market appreciation		1.5			0.8			2.3			4.3			—			4.3
As of December 31, 2020	$	20.6		$	7.2		$	27.8	(1)

As of December 31, 2021										$	25.1		$	7.2		$	32.3		(1)
Gross client inflows		5.7			0.5			6.2			4.4			2.0			6.4
Gross client outflows		(5.5	)		(0.5	)		(6.0	)		(5.8	)		(0.5	)		(6.3	)
Net client flows		0.2			—			0.2			(1.4	)		1.5			0.1

Market appreciation		4.3			—			4.3
As of December 31, 2021	$	25.1		$	7.2		$	32.3	(1)
Market depreciation											(2.8	)		(0.7	)		(3.5	)
As of December 31, 2022										$	20.9		$	8.0		$	28.9		(1)


PROPRIETARY EQUITY PERFORMANCE 1, 2	ANNUALIZED PERFORMANCE						ANNUALIZED PERFORMANCE
AS OF 12/31/2021	INCEPTION	1-YEAR	3-YEAR	5-YEAR	7-YEAR	INCEPTION

AS OF 12/31/2022							INCEPTION	1-YEAR		3-YEAR		5-YEAR		7-YEAR		INCEPTION
Large Cap Value Composite	4/1/02	31.7	23.3	16.8	14.2	10.4	4/1/02		-11.6		8.3		9.0		12.0		9.2
Russell 1000 Value Index		25.2	17.6	11.2	9.7	8.2			-7.5		6.0		6.7		9.1		7.4

Small Cap Value Composite	4/1/02	25.8	19.1	9.9	10.7	11.2	4/1/02		-10.8		6.2		4.9		9.3		10.1
Russell 2000 Value Index		28.3	18.0	9.1	9.5	8.8			-14.5		4.7		4.1		8.2		7.5

Smid Cap Value Composite	10/1/05	29.0	19.2	11.4	12.1	10.8	10/1/05		-14.8		4.4		4.9		9.6		9.1
Russell 2500 Value Index		27.8	18.3	9.9	9.6	8.6			-13.1		5.2		4.8		8.3		7.2

Multi Cap Value Composite	7/1/02	32.2	22.2	14.4	12.9	10.8	7/1/02		-17.3		6.0		6.3		9.8		9.3
Russell 3000 Value Index		25.4	17.6	11.0	9.7	8.8			-8.0		5.9		6.5		9.1		8.0

Equity Income Composite	12/1/03	28.4	16.5	12.6	11.9	12.1	12/1/03		-7.3		5.4		6.9		10.9		11.0
Russell 3000 Value Index		25.4	17.6	11.0	9.7	9.0			-8.0		5.9		6.5		9.1		8.1

Focused Value Composite	9/1/04	26.4	17.3	11.5	11.5	11.2	9/1/04		-18.4		2.5		3.5		7.9		9.3
Russell 3000 Value Index		25.4	17.6	11.0	9.7	8.8			-8.0		5.9		6.5		9.1		7.8

Small Cap Opportunity Composite	7/1/04	16.9	22.1	14.6	13.7	12.2	7/1/04		-16.0		6.3		7.7		10.5		10.4
Russell 2000 Index		14.8	20.0	12.0	10.8	9.4			-20.4		3.1		4.1		7.9		7.5

Small Cap Growth Composite	7/1/04	20.5	31.4	22.5	18.2	13.1	7/1/04		-25.0		11.4		12.4		14.4		10.6
Russell 2000 Growth Index		2.8	21.2	14.5	11.7	10.0			-26.4		0.6		3.5		7.1		7.6

Smid Cap Growth Composite	1/1/06	13.4	38.7	26.9	19.6	14.0	1/1/06		-32.8		10.3		13.5		14.6		10.5
Russell 2500 Growth Index		5.0	25.1	17.7	13.8	11.4			-26.2		2.9		6.0		9.0		8.7

The Russell 2500 Index is a capitalization-weighted, unmanaged index that measures the 2500 smallest companies in the Russell 3000. The Russell 2500 Value Index is a capitalization-weighted, unmanaged index that includes those Russell 2000 Index companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower expected growth values. The Russell 2500 Growth Index is a capitalization-weighted, unmanaged index that includes those Russell 2500 Index companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth.

The Russell 3000 Value Index is a capitalization-weighted, unmanaged index that measures those Russell 3000 Index companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth.

Our total revenue decreased by $8.4 million, or 6.4%, to $123.2 million for year ended December 31, 2022, from $131.6 million for year ended December 31, 2021. This decrease was driven by market depreciation and net client outflows in discretionary assets under management.

Assets under management decreased by $3.4 billion, or 10.5%, to $28.9 billion at December 31, 2022 from $32.3 billion at December 31, 2021. Our decrease in assets under management for the year ended December 31, 2022 was attributable to a decrease in discretionary assets under management of $4.2 billion, partially offset by an increase in non-discretionary assets under management of $0.8 billion. The decrease in our discretionary assets under management was driven by market depreciation and net client outflows. With respect to our discretionary assets under management, equity assets decreased by 15.9% during the year ended December 31, 2022 and fixed income assets increased by 4.7% during the same period. With respect to our discretionary assets under management, most of our decrease came from our smid growth, multi cap growth, REIT and core international strategies with composite returns of -32.7%, -26.6%, -26.3%, and -26.0%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2022. Compared to the year ended December 31, 2021, there was an increase of $0.2 billion of client inflows, an increase of $7.8 billion in market depreciation and an increase of $0.3 billion in client outflows. Our market depreciation during the year ended December 31, 2022 constituted a 12.1% rate of decrease in our total assets under management compared to December 31, 2021, as compared to our market appreciation during the year ended December 31, 2021 which constituted a 13.3% rate of increase in our total assets under management compared to December 31, 2020. Sub-advised fund management revenue increased by $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to the prior year. Proprietary fund management revenue decreased by $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to the prior year as a result of market appreciation. As of December 31, 2022, the composition of our assets under management was 72% in discretionary assets, which includes both separately managed accounts and proprietary and sub-advised funds, and 28% in non-discretionary assets which represent assets on which we provide portfolio reporting but do not have investment discretion.

Family office services revenue remained flat at $4.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.

Performance fee revenue was $0 and $0.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021. These performance fees are primarily related to external investment strategies in which we have a revenue sharing arrangement.

Our total revenue increased by $23.6 million, or 21.9%, to $131.6 million for year ended December 31, 2021, from $108.0 million for year ended December 31, 2020. This increase was driven by net client inflows and market appreciation in discretionary assets under management.

Assets under management increased by $4.5 billion, or 16.2%, to $32.3 billion at December 31, 2021 from $27.8 billion at December 31, 2020. Our increase in assets under management for the year ended December 31, 2021 was attributable to an increase in discretionary assets under management of $4.5 billion. Non-discretionary assets under management remained flat year over year. The increase in our discretionary assets under management was driven by market appreciation and net client inflows. With respect to our discretionary assets under management, equity assets increased by 18.1% during the year ended December 31, 2021 and fixed income assets increased by 6.6% during the same period. With respect to our discretionary assets under management, most of our increase came from our REIT, energy infrastructure, multi cap value and large cap value strategies with composite returns of 38.6%, 36.9%, 32.9% and 31.5%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2021. Compared to the year ended December 31, 2020, there was an increase of $2.0 billion of client inflows, an increase of $2.0 billion in market appreciation and an increase of $2.2 billion in client outflows. Our market appreciation during the year ended December 31, 2021 constituted a 13.3% rate of increase in our total assets under management compared to December 31, 2020, as compared to our market appreciation during the year ended December 31, 2020 which constituted a 8.3% rate of increase in our total assets under management compared to December 31, 2019. Sub-advised fund management revenue decreased by $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 as compared to the prior year. Proprietary fund management revenue increased by $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 as compared to the prior year as a result of market appreciation. As of December 31, 2021, the composition of our assets under management was 78% in discretionary assets, which includes both separately managed accounts and proprietary and sub-advised funds, and 22% in non-discretionary assets which represent assets on which we provide portfolio reporting but do not have investment discretion.

Family office services revenue increased by $0.3 million, or 7.9% to $4.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, from $4.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Performance fee revenue increased from $0 for the year ended December 31, 2020 to $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. These performance fees are primarily related to external investment strategies in which we have a revenue sharing arrangement.

Our total revenue increased by $5.8 million, or 5.7%, to $108.0 million for year ended December 31, 2020, from $102.2 million for year ended December 31, 2019. This increase was driven by net client inflows and market appreciation in discretionary assets under management.

Assets under management increased by $2.7 billion, or 10.8%, to $27.8 billion at December 31, 2020 from $25.1 billion at December 31, 2019. Our increase in assets under management for the year ended December 31, 2020 was attributable to an increase in discretionary assets under management of $1.8 billion and an increase of $0.9 billion in non-discretionary assets under management. The increase in our discretionary assets under management was driven by market appreciation and net client inflows. With respect to our discretionary assets under management, equity assets increased by 9.0% during the year ended December 31, 2020 and fixed income assets increased by 4.3% during the same period. With respect to our discretionary assets under management, most of our increase came from our Smid growth, small cap growth, core international, and small cap opportunity strategies with composite returns of 76.0%, 53.2%, 39.6% and 22.8%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2020. Compared to the year ended December 31, 2019, there was a decrease of $6.8 billion of client inflows, a decrease of $1.9 billion in market appreciation and a decrease of $5.3 billion in client outflows. Our market appreciation during the year ended December 31, 2020 constituted a 8.3% rate of increase in our total assets under management compared to December 31, 2019, as compared to our market appreciation during the year ended December 31, 2019 which constituted a 16.7% rate of increase in our total assets under management compared to December 31, 2018. Sub-advised fund management revenue increased by $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 as compared to the prior year. Proprietary fund management revenue decreased by $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 as compared to the prior year as a result of client redemptions and market performance. As of December 31, 2020, the composition of our assets under management was 74% in discretionary assets, which includes both separately managed accounts and proprietary and sub-advised funds, and 26% in non-discretionary assets which represent assets on which we provide portfolio reporting but do not have investment discretion.

~~Family office services revenue remained flat at $4.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019.~~

Performance fee revenue decreased from $25 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2019 to $0 for the year ended December 31, 2020. These performance fees are primarily related to external investment strategies in which we have a revenue sharing arrangement.

The following table represents a further breakdown of our assets under management for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019:~~2020:


	For the Years Ended December 31,									For the Years Ended December 31,
(in billions)	2021			2020			2019			2022			2021			2020
Total AUM as of January 1,	$	27.8		$	25.1		$	19.0		$	32.3		$	27.8		$	25.1
Discretionary AUM:
Total Discretionary AUM as of January 1,		20.6			18.8			14.2			25.1			20.6			18.8
New client accounts/assets		0.5			0.6			2.4	(1)		0.5			0.5			0.6		(1)
Closed accounts		(0.4	)		(0.2	)		(0.4	) (2)		(0.1	)		(0.4	)		(0.2	)	(2)
Net cash (outflow)/inflow		0.1			(0.1	)		(0.3	) (3)		(1.8	)		0.1			(0.1	)	(3)
Non-discretionary to Discretionary AUM		—			—			—	(4)		—			—			—		(4)
Market appreciation		4.3			1.5			2.9
Market (depreciation)/appreciation											(2.8	)		4.3			1.5
Change to Discretionary AUM		4.5			1.8			4.6			(4.2	)		4.5			1.8
Total Discretionary AUM at December 31,		25.1			20.6			18.8			20.9			25.1			20.6
Change to Non-Discretionary AUM		—			0.9			1.5	(5)		0.8			—			0.9		(5)
Total AUM as of December 31,	$	32.3		$	27.8		$	25.1		$	28.9		$	32.3		$	27.8

Our expenses for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019~~2020, are set forth below:


	For the Years Ended December 31,									For the Years Ended December 31,
(in thousands)	2021		2020		2021 vs. 2020 ($)		2021 vs. 2020 (%)			2022		2021		2022 vs. 2021 ($)			2022 vs. 2021 (%)
Compensation and benefits (1)	$	72,564	$	62,379	$	10,185		16.3	%	$	71,610	$	72,564	$	(954	)		(1.3	)%
General and administrative		28,518		23,323		5,195		22.3	%		13,045		28,518		(15,473	)		(54.3	)%
Total expenses	$	101,082	$	85,702	$	15,380		17.9	%	$	84,655	$	101,082	$	(16,427	)		(16.3	)%


	For the Years Ended December 31,									For the Years Ended December 31,
(in thousands)	2020		2019		2020 vs. 2019 ($)		2020 vs. 2019 (%)			2021		2020		2021 vs. 2020 ($)		2021 vs. 2020 (%)
Compensation and benefits (1)	$	62,379	$	60,038	$	2,341		3.9	%	$	72,564	$	62,379	$	10,185		16.3	%
General and administrative		23,232		23,241		82		0.4	%		28,518		23,323		5,195		22.3	%
Total expenses	$	85,702	$	83,279	$	2,423		2.9	%	$	101,082	$	85,702	$	15,380		17.9	%

Our expenses are driven primarily by our compensation costs. The table included in “—Expenses—Compensation and Benefits Expense” describes the components of our compensation expense for the three years ended December 31, ~~2021.~~2022. Other expenses, such as rent, professional service fees, data-related costs, and sub-advisory fees incurred are included in our general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Total expenses decreased by $16.4 million, or 16.3%, to $84.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 from $101.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. This decrease was attributable to a decrease in compensation and benefits expense of $1.0 million and a decrease in general and administrative expenses of $15.4 million.

Compensation and benefits expense decreased by $1.0 million, or 1.3%, to $71.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 from $72.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in the accrual for bonuses of $2.3 million and a decrease in equity based compensation expense of $0.3 million due to a decrease in the number of unvested restricted stock units and unvested non-qualified stock options outstanding, partially offset by an increase in salaries and benefits expense of $1.7 million primarily as a result of merit-based increases and newly-hired staff.

General and administrative expenses decreased by $15.4 million, or 54.3%, to $13.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 from $28.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The decrease was primarily attributable to decreases in the fair value of contingent consideration related to the Cortina Acquisition of $17.5 million, occupancy and related costs of $0.2 million and trade errors of $0.3 million. These decreases were partially offset by increases in professional fees of $0.6 million, portfolio and systems expenses of $0.3 million, travel and entertainment costs of $1.1 million, charitable donations of $0.1 million, office expenses of $0.1 million, training and conference expenses of $0.1 million, telephone and internet costs of $0.1 million and an increase in the fair value of contingent consideration related to the Neosho Acquisition of $0.1 million. Information regarding acquisitions can be found in Note 3. “Acquisitions” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this filing.

Total expenses increased by $15.4 million, or 17.9%, to $101.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 from $85.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. This increase was attributable to an increase in compensation and benefits expense of $10.2 million and an increase in general and administrative expenses of $5.2 million.

Compensation and benefits expense increased by $10.2 million, or 16.3%, to $72.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 from $62.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in the accrual for bonuses of $7.8 million, an increase in salaries expense of $1.6 million primarily as a result of merit-based increases and newly-hired staff and an increase in equity based compensation expense of $0.8 million due to an increase in the number of unvested restricted stock units and unvested non-qualified stock options outstanding.

General and administrative expenses increased by $5.2 million, or 22.3%, to $28.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 from $23.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase was primarily attributable to increases in the fair value of contingent consideration related to the Cortina Acquisition of $4.6 million, professional fees of $0.1 million, portfolio and systems expenses of $0.4 million, sub-advisory and referrals fees of $0.1 million, insurance costs of $0.1 million, marketing and advertising costs of $0.1 million, administrative costs of $0.1 million and charitable donations of $0.1 million. These increases were partially offset by decreases in the fair value of contingent consideration related to the Neosho Acquisition of $0.3 million and occupancy and related costs of $0.1 million. Information regarding acquisitions can be found in Note 3. “Acquisitions” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in ~~“— Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this filing.~~

Total expenses increased by $2.4 million, or 2.9%, to $85.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 from $83.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. This increase was attributable to an increase in compensation and benefits expense of $2.3 million and an increase in general and administrative expenses of $0.1 million.

Compensation and benefits expense increased by $2.3 million, or 3.9%, to $62.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 from $60.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in the accrual for bonuses of $1.5 million, an increase in salaries expense of $1.8 million primarily as a result of merit-based increases and newly-hired staff, including the addition of Cortina staff, and an increase in benefits costs of $0.6 million, partially offset by a decrease in equity based compensation expense of $1.6 million due to a decrease in the number of unvested restricted stock units and unvested non-qualified stock options outstanding.

General and administrative expenses increased by $0.1 million, or 0.4%, to $23.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 from $23.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. The increase was primarily attributable to increases in the fair value of contingent consideration related to the Cortina Acquisition of $1.1 million, depreciation and amortization expense of $0.8 million related mainly to the amortization of intangible assets related to the Cortina Acquisition and to the renovation of our office space in New York City, occupancy and related expenses of $0.4 million related to the increased costs of cleaning due to the coronavirus pandemic, portfolio and systems expenses of $0.4 million, insurance costs of $0.1 million, the fair value of contingent consideration related to the Neosho Acquisition of $0.2 million and the fair value of contingent consideration related to the Cappiccille Acquisition of $0.2 million. These increases were partially offset by decreases in the fair value of contingent consideration related to the Jamison Acquisition of $0.1 million, travel and entertainment expenses of $0.9 million as a result of the coronavirus pandemic, professional fees of $1.3 million, office expense of $0.1 million as a result of the coronavirus pandemic, printing costs of $0.1 million, charitable donations of $0.1 million, telephone related expenses of $0.1 million and storage and moving expenses of $0.4 million. Information regarding acquisitions can be found in Note 3. “Acquisitions” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in “— Item“Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this filing.


	For the Years Ended December 31,													For the Years Ended December 31,
(in thousands)		2021			2020			2021 vs. 2020 ($)			2021 vs. 2020 (%)			2022			2021			2022 vs. 2021 ($)			2022 vs. 2021 (%)
Other income (expense), net		$	190		$	243		$	(53	)		-21.8	%	$	260		$	190		$	70			36.8	%
Interest income			7			13			(6	)		-46.2	%		24			7			17			242.9	%
Interest expense			(383	)		(563	)		180			32.0	%		(416	)		(383	)		(33	)		8.6	%
Equity income from investments			1,534			898			636			70.8	%		(31	)		1,534			(1,565	)		-102.0	%
Total other income (expense), net		$	1,348		$	591		$	757			128.1	%	$	(163	)	$	1,348		$	(1,511	)		-112.1	%


	For the Years Ended December 31,													For the Years Ended December 31,
(in thousands)		2020			2019			2020 vs. 2019 ($)			2020 vs. 2019 (%)			2021			2020			2021 vs. 2020 ($)			2021 vs. 2020 (%)
Other income (expense), net		$	243		$	255		$	(12	)		-4.7	%	$	190		$	243		$	(53	)		-21.8	%
Interest income			13			169			(156	)		-92.3	%		7			13			(6	)		-46.2	%
Interest expense			(563	)		(481	)		(82	)		17.0	%		(383	)		(563	)		180			-32.0	%
Equity income from investments			898			1,774			(876	)		-49.4	%		1,534			898			636			70.8	%
Total other income (expense), net		$	591		$	1,717		$	(1,126	)		-65.6	%	$	1,348		$	591		$	757			128.1	%

Other income (expense), net decreased by $1.5 million, or 112.1% to ($0.2) million for the year ended December 31, 2022 from $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. There was a $0.2 million adjustment to the fair value of our tax receivable agreement liability as of December 31, 2022. The adjustment in fair value was a result of a reduction in the future effective corporate tax rates at the federal level and in New York City as a result of law changes. Equity income from investments decreased by $1.6 million in 2022 as compared with the same period in the prior year as a result of decreased performance fee allocations. Interest expense increased for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to the prior year as a result of higher interest rates owed on borrowings under the credit facility. Interest income increased as a result of higher balances in interest-bearing accounts during the year.

Other income (expense), net increased by $0.8 million, or 128.1% to $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 from $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. There was a $0.1 million adjustment to the fair value of our tax receivable agreement liability as of December 31, 2021. The adjustment in fair value was a result of a reduction in the future effective corporate tax rates at the federal level and in New York City as a result of law changes. Equity income from investments increased by $0.6 million in 2021 as compared with the same period in the prior year as a result of increased performance fee allocations. Interest expense decreased for the year ended December 31, 2021 as compared to the prior year as a result of interest owed on borrowings under the credit facility. Interest income decreased as a result of lower balances on notes receivable as a result of scheduled repayments.

Year Ended December 31, ~~2020~~2022 versus Year Ended December 31, ~~2019~~2021

~~Other~~The provision for income ~~(expense), net decreased by $1.1~~taxes was $7.6 million ~~or 65.6% to $0.6~~and $6.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Our provision for income taxes as a percentage of income before provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, ~~2020 from $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. There~~2022 and 2021 was a $0.2 million adjustment to the fair value of our tax receivable agreement liability as of December 31, 2020. The adjustment in fair value was a result of a reduction in the future effective corporate tax rates at the federal level19.8% and in New York City as a result of law changes. Equity income from investments decreased by $0.9 million in 2020 as compared with the same period in the prior year as a result of decreased performance fee allocations. Interest expense increased for the year ended December 31, 2020 as compared to the prior year as a result of interest owed on borrowings under the credit facility. Interest income decreased as a result of lower balances on notes receivable as a result of scheduled repayments.

The provision for income taxes was $6.9 million and $5.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Our provision for income taxes as a percentage of income before provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 was 21.7% and 23.6%, respectively.

The provision for income taxes was $5.4 million and $5.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Our provision for income taxes as a percentage of income before provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 was 23.6% and 25.1%, respectively.

To provide investors with additional insight, promote transparency and allow for a more comprehensive understanding of the information used by management in its financial and operational decision-making, we supplement our consolidated financial statements presented on a basis consistent with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, with Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA margin, Adjusted Net Income, and Adjusted Earnings Per Share, which are non-GAAP financial measures of earnings.

These adjustments, and the non-GAAP financial measures that are derived from them, provide supplemental information to analyze our operations between periods and over time. Investors should consider our non-GAAP financial measures in addition to, and not as a substitute for, financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.

The following tables contain reconciliations of net income to Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Earnings Per Share (amounts in thousands except per share amounts).


	Year Ended December 31,									Year Ended December 31,
	2021			2020			2019			2022			2021			2020
Reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measure:
Net income	$	24,946		$	17,478		$	15,412		$	30,793		$	24,946		$	17,478
GAAP Provision for income taxes		6,923			5,394			5,178			7,606			6,923			5,394
Delaware Franchise Tax		200			200			200			200			200			200
Interest expense		383			563			481			416			383			563
Interest income		(7	)		(13	)		(169	)		(24	)		(7	)		(13	)
Depreciation and amortization		3,923			3,968			3,191			3,883			3,923			3,968
Equity-based compensation		1,126			659			2,272			1,149			1,126			659
Other adjustments (A)		5,947			2,047			2,027			(12,002	)		5,947			2,047
Adjusted EBITDA	$	43,441		$	30,296		$	28,592		$	32,021		$	43,441		$	30,296
Adjusted EBITDA Margin		33.0	%		28.1	%		28.0	%		26.0	%		33.0	%		28.1	%
Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Earnings Per Share
Reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measure:
Net income	$	24,946		$	17,478		$	15,412		$	30,793		$	24,946		$	17,478
GAAP Provision for income taxes		6,923			5,394			5,178			7,606			6,923			5,394
Delaware Franchise Tax		200			200			200			200			200			200
Other adjustments (A)		5,947			2,047			2,027			(12,002	)		5,947			2,047
Adjusted earnings before provision for income taxes		38,016			25,119			22,817			26,597			38,016			25,119
Adjusted provision for income taxes:
Adjusted provision for income taxes (26% assumed tax rate)		(9,884	)		(6,531	)		(5,932	)		(6,915	)		(9,884	)		(6,531	)

Adjusted net income	$	28,132		$	18,588		$	16,885		$	19,682		$	28,132		$	18,588

GAAP net income per share (B):
GAAP net income per share (B):
Basic and diluted	$	1.52		$	1.05		$	0.98		$	1.92		$	1.52		$	1.05
Adjusted earnings per share/unit (B):
Adjusted earnings per share/unit (B):
Basic	$	1.95		$	1.29		$	1.18		$	1.40		$	1.95		$	1.29
Diluted	$	1.89		$	1.28		$	1.17		$	1.35		$	1.89		$	1.28
Shares/units outstanding:
Basic Class A shares outstanding		9,869			9,651			9,330			9,560			9,869			9,651
Basic Class B shares/units outstanding		4,594			4,722			5,031			4,545			4,594			4,722
Total basic shares/units outstanding		14,463			14,373			14,361			14,105			14,463			14,373

Diluted Class A shares outstanding (C)		9,891			9,659			9,332			9,592			9,891			9,659
Diluted Class B shares/units outstanding (D)		5,017			4,883			5,066			5,011			5,017			4,883
Total diluted shares/units outstanding		14,908			14,542			14,398			14,603			14,908			14,542


	Year Ended December 31,						Year Ended December 31,
	2021		2020		2019		2022			2021		2020
Acquisition costs (a)	$	363	$	350	$	1,371	$	37		$	363	$	350
Severance		10		—		13		13			10		—
Non-acquisition expansion costs (b)		—		—		97
Other (c)		5,574		1,697		546
Other (b)								(12,052	)		5,574		1,697
Total other adjustments	$	5,947	$	2,047	$	2,027	$	(12,002	)	$	5,947	$	2,047

Historically, the working capital needs of our business have primarily been met through cash generated by our operations. We expect that our cash and liquidity requirements in the next twelve months will be met primarily through cash generated by our operations. The challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact on our business and cash flows are evolving rapidly and cannot be predicted at this time. Consequently, we will continue to evaluate our liquidity and financial position on an ongoing basis.

On June 24, 2013, the subsidiaries of Silvercrest L.P. entered into a $15.0 million credit facility with City National Bank. The subsidiaries of Silvercrest L.P. are the borrowers under such facility and Silvercrest L.P. guarantees the obligations of its subsidiaries under the credit facility. The credit facility is secured by certain assets of Silvercrest L.P. and its subsidiaries. The credit facility consists of a $7.5 million delayed draw term loan that matures on June 24, 2025 and a $7.5 million revolving credit facility that was scheduled to mature on June 21, 2019. On July 1, 2019, the credit facility was amended to increase the term loan by $18.0 million to $25.5 million, extend the draw date on the term loan facility to July 1, 2024, extend the maturity date of the term loan to July 1, 2026 and increase the revolving credit facility by $2.5 million to $10.0 million. On June 17, ~~2021,~~2022, the revolving credit facility was further amended to extend the maturity date to June 18, ~~2022.~~2023 and amended to replace LIBOR terms with SOFR. The loan bears interest at either (a) the higher of the prime rate plus a margin of 0.25 percentage points and 2.5% or (b) the ~~LIBOR~~SOFR rate plus ~~2.75~~2.80 percentage points, at the borrowers’ option. Borrowings under the term loan on or prior to June 30, 2021 are payable in 20 equal quarterly installments. Borrowings under the term loan after June 30, 2021 ~~are~~will be payable in equal quarterly installments through the maturity date. On February 15, 2022, the credit facility was amended and restated to reflect changes to various definitions and related clauses with respect to our subsidiaries. The credit facility contains restrictions on, among other things, (i) incurrence of additional debt, (ii) creating liens on certain assets, (iii) making certain investments, (iv) consolidating, merging or otherwise disposing of substantially all of our assets, (v) the sale of certain assets, and (vi) entering into transactions with affiliates. In addition, the credit facility contains certain financial covenants including a test on discretionary assets under management, maximum debt to EBITDA and a fixed charge coverage ratio. The credit facility contains customary events of default, including the occurrence of a change in control which includes a person or group of persons acting together acquiring more than 30% of the total voting securities of Silvercrest. Any undrawn amounts under this facility would be available to fund future acquisitions or for working capital purposes, if needed. As of December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, we had ~~$9.0~~$6.3 million and ~~$12.6~~$9.0 million outstanding under the term loan. We were in compliance with the covenants under the credit facility as of December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020.~~2021.

Our ongoing sources of cash will primarily consist of management fees and family office services fees, which are principally collected quarterly. We will primarily use cash flow from operations to pay compensation and related expenses, general and administrative expenses, income taxes, debt service, capital expenditures, distributions to Class B unit holders and dividends on shares of our Class A common stock.

Seasonality typically affects cash flow since the first quarter of each year, includes as a source of cash, the prior year’s annual performance fee payments, if any, from our various funds and external investment strategies and, as a use of cash, the prior fiscal year’s incentive compensation. We believe that we have sufficient cash from our operations to fund our operations and commitments for the next twelve months.

The following table sets forth certain key financial data relating to our liquidity and capital resources as of December 31, 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019.~~2020.


	Years Ended December 31,						Years Ended December 31,
(in thousands)	2021		2020		2019		2022		2021		2020
Cash and cash equivalents	$	85,744	$	62,498	$	52,832	$	77,432	$	85,744	$	62,498
Accounts receivable	$	8,850	$	8,341	$	8,958	$	9,118	$	8,850	$	8,341
Due from Silvercrest Funds	$	428	$	1,018	$	1,697	$	577	$	428	$	1,018

We anticipate that distributions to the principals of Silvercrest L.P. will continue to be a material use of our cash resources and will vary in amount and timing based on our operating results and dividend policy. We pay and intend to continue paying quarterly cash dividends to holders of our Class A common stock. We are a holding company and have no material assets other than our ownership of interests in Silvercrest L.P. As a result, we will depend upon distributions from Silvercrest L.P. to pay any dividends to our Class A stockholders. We expect to cause Silvercrest L.P. to make distributions to us in an amount sufficient to cover dividends, if any, declared by us. Our dividend policy has certain risks and limitations, particularly with respect to liquidity. Although we expect to pay dividends according to our dividend policy, we may not pay dividends according to our policy, or at all, if, among other things, we do not have the cash necessary to pay our intended dividends or our subsidiaries are prevented from making a distribution to us under the terms of our current credit facility or any future financing. To the extent we do not have cash on hand sufficient to pay dividends, we may decide not to pay dividends. By paying cash dividends rather than investing that cash in our future growth, we risk slowing the pace of our growth, or not having a sufficient amount of cash to fund our operations or unanticipated capital expenditures, should the need arise.

Our purchase of Class B units in Silvercrest L.P. that occurred concurrently with the consummation of our initial public offering, and the future exchanges of Class B units of Silvercrest L.P., are expected to result in increases in our share of the tax basis of the tangible and intangible assets of Silvercrest L.P. at the time of our acquisition and these future exchanges, which will increase the tax depreciation and amortization deductions that otherwise would not have been available to us. These increases in tax basis and tax depreciation and amortization deductions are expected to reduce the amount of tax that we would otherwise be required to pay in the future. We entered into a tax receivable agreement with the current principals of Silvercrest L.P. and any future employee-holders of Class B units pursuant to which we agreed to pay them 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax that we actually realize as a result of these increases in tax basis and certain other tax benefits related to entering into the tax receivable agreement, including tax benefits attributable to payments thereunder. The timing of these payments is currently unknown. The payments to be made pursuant to the tax receivable agreement will be a liability of Silvercrest and not Silvercrest L.P., and thus this liability has been recorded as an “other liability” on our Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition. For purposes of the tax receivable agreement, cash savings in income tax will be computed by comparing our actual income tax liability to the amount of such taxes that we would have been required to pay had there been no increase in our share of the tax basis of the tangible and intangible assets of Silvercrest L.P.

The actual increase in tax basis, as well as the amount and timing of any payments under the tax receivable agreement, will vary depending upon a number of factors, including the timing of exchanges, the price of shares of our Class A common stock at the time of the exchange, the extent to which such exchanges are taxable, the amount and timing of our income and the tax rates then applicable. Nevertheless, we expect that as a result of the size of the increases in the tax basis of our tangible and intangible assets, the payments that we may make under the tax receivable agreement likely will be substantial. Assuming no material changes in the relevant tax law and that we earn sufficient taxable income to realize the full tax benefit of the increased depreciation and amortization of our assets, we expect that future payments to the selling principals of Silvercrest L.P. in respect of our purchase of Class B units from them will aggregate approximately ~~$9.2~~$8.9 million. Future payments to current principals of Silvercrest L.P. and future holders of Class B units in respect of subsequent exchanges would be in addition to these amounts and are expected to be substantial. We intend to fund required payments pursuant to the tax receivable agreement from the distributions received from Silvercrest L.P.

The following table sets forth our cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019.~~2020. Operating activities consist of net income subject to adjustments for changes in operating assets and liabilities, depreciation, and equity-based compensation expense. Investing activities consist primarily of acquiring and selling property and equipment, distributions received from investments in investment funds, and cash paid as part of business acquisitions. Financing activities consist primarily of contributions from partners, distributions to partners, the issuance and payments on partner notes, other financings, and earnout payments related to business acquisitions.


	Years Ended December 31,									Years Ended December 31,
(in thousands)	2021			2020			2019			2022			2021			2020
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	44,278		$	26,846		$	18,775		$	23,383		$	44,278		$	26,846
Net cash used in investing activities		(908	)		(626	)		(39,380	)		(956	)		(908	)		(626	)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(20,124	)		(16,554	)		4,154
Net cash used in financing activities											(30,739	)		(20,124	)		(16,554	)
Net change in cash	$	23,246		$	9,666		$	(16,451	)	$	(8,312	)	$	23,246		$	9,666

Operating activities provided $23.4 million and $44.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. This difference is primarily the result of increases in net income of $5.8 million, deferred tax expense of $3.1 million, operating lease liabilities of $0.9 million, a decrease in equity income from investments of $1.6 million and distributions received from investment funds of $0.6 million. These increases were partially offset by a change in the TRA liability of $0.1 million, a change in prepaid and other assets of $2.9 million, and decreases in accounts receivable of $0.5 million due to timing of payments received from clients, non-cash lease expense of $1.5 million, equity-based compensation expense of $0.3 million, accounts payable and accrued expenses of $17.8 million, primarily due to a change in the fair value of contingent consideration related to the Cortina Acquisition and accrued compensation of $9.8 million.

Operating activities provided $44.3 million and $26.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. This difference is primarily the result of increases in net income of $11.0 million, non-cash lease expense of $1.6 million, depreciation and amortization expense of $0.9 million primarily as a result of the Cortina Acquisition and the completion of renovations to our offices, equity-based compensation expense of $1.0 million, accounts payable and accrued expenses of $6.8 million, primarily due to a change in the fair value of contingent consideration related to the Cortina Acquisition and accrued compensation of $17.6 million. These increases were partially offset by an increase in equity income from investments of $1.5 million due to higher performance fee allocations, a change in the TRA liability of $0.1 million, and decreases in accounts receivable of $0.1 million due to timing of payments received from clients, deferred tax expense of $0.8 million, distributions received from investment funds of $0.9 million and operating lease liabilities of $1.2 million.

Year Ended December 31, ~~2020~~2022 versus Year Ended December 31, ~~2019~~2021

~~Operating activities provided $26.8 million and $18.8 million for~~For the years ended December 31, ~~2020~~2022 and ~~2019, respectively. This difference is primarily the result of increases in net income of $2.1~~2021, investing activities used $1.0 million ~~distributions received from investment funds of $0.3 million, non-cash lease expense of $3.4 million, depreciation~~ and amortization expense of $0.8 million primarily as a result of the Cortina Acquisition and the completion of renovations to our offices, deferred tax expense of $0.7 million, accounts payable and accrued expenses of $0.5 million, primarily due to a change in the fair value of contingent consideration related to the Cortina Acquisition and accrued compensation of $0.8 million. These increases were partially offset by decreases in equity income from investments of $0.9 million, ~~due to lower performance fee allocations, accounts receivable~~respectively. The primary use of ~~$4.9 million due to timing~~cash during 2022 and 2021was for the acquisition of ~~payments received from clients, equity-based compensation expense of $1.6 million, operating lease liabilities of $3.7 million.~~furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements.

For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, investing activities used $0.9 million and $0.6 million, respectively. The primary use of cash during 2021 was for the acquisition of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements. The primary use of cash during 2020 was for the acquisition of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements mostly related to the renovation of our office space in New York City.

Year Ended December 31, ~~2020~~2022 versus Year Ended December 31, ~~2019~~2021

For the years ended December 31, ~~2020~~2022 and ~~2019, investing~~2021, financing activities used ~~$0.6~~$30.7 million and ~~$39.4~~$20.1 million, respectively. ~~The primary use~~Dividends of ~~cash~~$6.8 million and $6.4 million were paid during ~~2020~~2022 and 2021, respectively, to Class A shareholders. Payments received from partners on notes receivable was ~~for~~$0.2 million in each of 2022 and 2021. Distributions to partners of Silvercrest L.P. of $7.9 million and $6.7 million were paid during 2022 and 2021, respectively. Repayment of borrowings under the ~~acquisition~~credit facility was $2.7 million and $3.6 million in 2022 and 2021, respectively. Payments of ~~furniture, equipment~~contingent purchase price consideration totaled $4.6 million and ~~leasehold improvements mostly related to the renovation~~$3.0 million in 2022 and 2021, respectively. During 2022 and 2021, approximately 476 thousand and 33 thousand shares of ~~our office space in New York City. The primary use~~Class A common stock of ~~cash during 2019 was for cash paid~~Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. were purchased at ~~closing~~a cost of ~~the Neosho~~$8.8 million and ~~Cortina Acquisitions and for the acquisition of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements mostly related to the renovation of our office space in New York City.~~

For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, financing activities used $20.1 million and $16.6 million, respectively. Dividends of $6.4 million and $6.1 million were paid during 2021 and 2020, respectively, to Class A shareholders. Payments received from partners on notes receivable was $0.2 million in 2021 and $0.3 million in 2020. Distributions to partners of Silvercrest L.P. of $6.7 million and $6.3 million were paid during 2021 and 2020, respectively. Repayment of borrowings under the credit facility was $3.6 million in both 2021 and 2020. Payments of contingent purchase price consideration totaled $3.0 million and $0.7 million in 2021 and 2020, respectively.

For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, financing activities used $16.6 million and provided $4.2 million, respectively. Borrowings under the credit facility were $18.0 million in 2019. Dividends of $6.1 million and $5.3 million were paid during each of 2020 and 2019, respectively, to Class A shareholders. Payments received from partners on notes receivable of $0.3 million in 2020 and 2019. Distributions to partners of Silvercrest L.P. of $6.3 million and $7.7 million were paid during 2020 and 2019, respectively. Repayment of borrowings under the credit facility were $3.6 million and $1.8 million in 2020 and 2019, respectively. Payments of contingent purchase price consideration totaled $0.7 million and $0.4 million in 2020 and 2019, respectively.

We anticipate that distributions to principals of Silvercrest L.P. will continue to be a material use of our cash resources, and will vary in amount and timing based on our operating results and dividend policy.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, ~~and 2020, $9.0~~$6.3 million and ~~$12.6~~$9.0 was outstanding under our term loan with City National Bank.

As of December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, there were no borrowings outstanding on our revolving credit facility with City National Bank.

As a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to provide this information.

We did not have any significant off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, ~~2021~~2022 or December 31, ~~2020.~~2021.

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues, expenses and other income reported in the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under current circumstances, our results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily available from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates and assumptions made by management include the fair value of acquired assets and liabilities, impairment of goodwill and intangible assets, revenue recognition, equity based compensation, accounting for income taxes, and other matters that affect the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. Accounting policies are an integral part of our consolidated financial statements. An understanding of these accounting policies is essential when reviewing our reported results of operations and our financial condition. Management believes that the critical accounting policies and estimates discussed below involve additional management judgment due to the sensitivity of the methods and assumptions used.

We account for business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting. The acquisition method of accounting requires that purchase price, including the fair value of contingent consideration, of the acquisition be allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed using the estimated fair values determined by management as of the acquisition date.

We measure the fair value of contingent consideration at each reporting period using a probability-adjusted discounted cash flow method based on significant inputs not observable in the market and any change in the fair value from either the passage of time or events occurring after the acquisition date, is recorded in earnings. In relation to our acquisitions of Milbank and Jamison, the fair value of the contingent consideration was based on discounted cash flow models using projected EBITDA for each earnout period. The discount rate applied to the projected EBITDA was determined based on our weighted average cost of capital and considered that the overall risk associated with the payments was similar to the overall risks of our business as there is no target, floor or cap associated with the contingent payments. In relation to the Neosho acquisition, the fair value of the contingent consideration was based on discounted cash flow models using projected revenue from each earnout period. The discount rate applied to the projected revenue was determined based on the weighted average cost of capital of the Company and took into account that the overall risk associated with the payments was similar to the overall risks of the Company as there is no target, floor of cap associated with the contingent payments. In relation to the Cortina Acquisition, the income approach was used to determine the fair value o the contingent consideration by estimating a range of likely outcomes and payouts given these outcomes. The potential payouts were estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation and discounted back to their present values using a risk-free discount rate adjusted to account for the Company’s credit or counterparty risk to arrive at the present value of the contingent consideration payments. The discount rate for the contingent consideration payment was based on the revenue cost of capital for Cortina’s revenue.

The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the identifiable assets acquired, including intangibles, and liabilities assumed is recorded as goodwill. The Company generally uses valuation specialists to perform appraisals and assist in the determination of the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. These valuations require management to make estimates and assumptions that are critical in determining the fair values of the assets and liabilities. During the measurement period, the Company may record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Any adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period are recorded in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to earnings.

Goodwill is not amortized but is evaluated for impairment at least annually, on October 1st of every year, or whenever events or circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred.

We account for Goodwill under Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) No. 350, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other,” which provides an entity the option to first perform a qualitative assessment of whether a reporting unit’s fair value is more likely than not less than its carrying value, including goodwill. In performing its qualitative assessment, an entity considers the extent to which adverse events or circumstances identified, such as changes in economic conditions, industry and market conditions or entity specific events, could affect the comparison of the reporting unit’s fair value with its carrying amount. If an entity concludes that the fair value of a reporting unit is more likely than not less than its carrying amount, the entity is required to perform the currently prescribed two-step goodwill impairment test to identify potential goodwill impairment and, accordingly, measure the amount, if any, of goodwill impairment loss to be recognized for that reporting unit. We utilized this option when performing our annual impairment assessment in 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019,~~2020, and concluded that our single reporting unit’s fair value was more likely than not greater than its carrying value, including goodwill.

Investment advisory fees are typically billed quarterly in advance at the beginning of the quarter or in arrears after the end of the quarter, based on a contractual percentage of the assets managed. Family office services fees are also typically billed quarterly in advance at the beginning of the quarter or in arrears after the end of the quarter based on a contractual percentage of the assets managed or upon a contractually agreed-upon flat fee arrangement. Revenue is recognized on a ratable basis over the period in which services are performed.

We account for performance-based revenue in accordance with ASC 606-10-32, Accounting for Management Fees Based on a Formula, by recognizing performance fees and allocations as revenue only when it is certain that the fee income is earned and payable pursuant to the relevant agreements. In certain arrangements, we are only entitled to receive performance fees and allocations when the return on assets under management exceeds certain benchmark returns or other performance targets. We record performance fees and allocations as a component of revenue once the performance fee has crystallized. As a result, there is no estimate or variability in the consideration when revenue is recorded.

Because the majority of our revenues are earned based on assets under management that have been determined using fair value methods and since market appreciation/depreciation has a significant impact on our revenue, we have presented our assets under management using the GAAP framework for measuring fair value. That framework provides a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs based on company assumptions (Level 3). A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the instrument’s fair value measurement. The three levels within the fair value hierarchy are described as follows:

The table below summarizes the approximate amount of assets under management for the periods indicated for which fair value is measured based on Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 inputs.


	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(in billions)								(in billions)
December 31, 2022 AUM									$	22.4	$	3.6	$	2.9	$	28.9
December 31, 2021 AUM	$	25.3	$	5.4	$	1.6	$	32.3	$	25.3	$	5.4	$	1.6	$	32.3
December 31, 2020 AUM	$	20.5	$	4.7	$	2.6	$	27.8

As substantially all our assets under management are valued by independent pricing services based upon observable market prices or inputs, we believe market risk is the most significant risk underlying valuation of our assets under management, as discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” in this annual report.

The average value of our assets under management for the year ended December 31, 2022 was approximately $30.6 billion. Assuming a 10% increase or decrease in our average assets under management and the change being proportionately distributed over all our products, the value would increase or decrease by approximately $3.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2022, which would cause an annualized increase or decrease in revenues of approximately $12.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, at a weighted average fee rate for the year ended December 31, 2022 of 0.40%.

The average value of our assets under management for the year ended December 31, 2021 was approximately $30.1 billion. Assuming a 10% increase or decrease in our average assets under management and the change being proportionately distributed over all our products, the value would increase or decrease by approximately $3.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2021, which would cause an annualized increase or decrease in revenues of approximately $13.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, at a weighted average fee rate for the year ended December 31, ~~2020~~2021 of 0.44%.

The average value of our assets under management for the year ended December 31, 2020 was approximately $26.5 billion. Assuming a 10% increase or decrease in our average assets under management and the change being proportionately distributed over all our products, the value would increase or decrease by approximately $2.7 billion for the year ended December 31, 2020, which would cause an annualized increase or decrease in revenues of approximately $10.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, at a weighted average fee rate for the year ended December 31, 2020 of 0.41%.

On November 2, 2012, our board of directors adopted the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan.

Information regarding restricted stock units and stock options can be found in Note 16. ~~“Equity Based~~“Equity-Based Compensation” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in ~~“— Item~~“Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this filing.

In connection with our initial public offering and reorganization of Silvercrest L.P. that was completed on June 23, 2013, we entered into a tax receivable agreement with the partners of Silvercrest L.P. that requires it to pay them 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax that it actually realizes (or is deemed to realize in the case of an early

termination payment by it, or a change in control) as a result of the increases in tax basis and certain other tax benefits related to entering into the tax receivable agreement, including tax benefits attributable to payments under the tax receivable agreement or attributable to exchanges of shares of Class B common stock for shares of Class A common stock. The payments to be made pursuant to the tax receivable agreement are a liability of Silvercrest and not Silvercrest L.P.

The actual amount and timing of any payments under these agreements will vary depending upon a number of factors, including the timing of sales or exchanges by the holders of limited partnership units, the price of the Class A common stock at the time of such sales or exchanges, whether such sales or exchanges are taxable, the amount and timing of the taxable income Silvercrest generates in the future and the tax rate then applicable and the portion of Silvercrest’s payments under the tax receivable agreement constituting imputed interest or depreciable basis or amortizable basis.

Silvercrest L.P., our operating company, is not subject to federal and state income taxes, since all income, gains and losses are passed through to its partners. Our operating company is subject to New York City Unincorporated Business Tax. We, including our affiliated incorporated entities, are subject to federal and state corporate income tax, which requires an asset and liability approach to the financial accounting and reporting of income taxes. With respect to our incorporated entities, the annual tax rate is based on the income, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. Tax laws are complex and subject to different interpretations by the taxpayer and respective governmental taxing authorities. Judgment is required in determining the tax expense and in evaluating tax positions. The tax effects of an uncertain tax position (“UTP”) taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns are recognized only if it is “more likely-than-not” to be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on its technical merits as of the reporting date. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. We recognize estimated interest and penalties related to UTPs in income tax expense.

We recognize the benefit of a UTP in the period when it is effectively settled. Previously recognized tax positions are derecognized in the first period in which it is no longer more likely than not that the tax position would be sustained upon examination.

Information regarding recent accounting developments and their impact on Silvercrest can be found in Note 2. “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in ~~“— Item~~“Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this filing.

Item 7A. ~~Qualitative~~Quantitative and ~~Quantitative~~Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Market Risk

Our exposure to market risk is directly related to our role as investment adviser for the separate accounts we manage and the funds for which we act as sub-investment adviser. Most of our revenue for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019~~2020 was derived from advisory fees, which are typically based on the market value of assets under management. Accordingly, a decline in the prices of securities would cause our revenue and income to decline due to a decrease in the value of the assets we manage. In addition, such a decline could cause our clients to withdraw their funds in favor of investments offering higher returns or lower risk, which would cause our revenue and income to decline further. Due to the nature of our business, we believe that we do not face any material risk from inflation. Please see our discussion of market risks in “—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Revenue Recognition” which is part of Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

See “Index to Consolidated Financial Statements” which appears on page F-1 of this report.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) at December 31, ~~2021.~~2022. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at December 31, ~~2021.~~2022.

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, ~~2021~~2022 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting. We have not experienced any material impact to our internal controls over financial reporting despite the fact that most of our employees are working remotely due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We are continually monitoring and assessing the COVID-19 pandemic situation on our internal controls to minimize the impact on their design and operating effectiveness.

Company management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and includes those policies and procedures that: (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. There are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility that misstatements may not be prevented or detected. Accordingly, even effective internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. Furthermore, the effectiveness of internal controls can change with circumstances. Company management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2021,~~2022, based on the 2013 version of the Internal Control - Integrated Framework set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013). Based on that assessment, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, ~~2021.~~2022.

Deloitte & Touche LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, has audited and issued a report on our internal controls over financial reporting, which is included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Information required by this item will be included in our definitive Proxy Statement for our ~~2022~~2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed within 120 days of the end of our fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2021 (“2021~~2022 (the “2023 Proxy Statement”) and is incorporated herein by reference.

Information required by this item will be included in the ~~2022~~2023 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Information required by this item will be included in the ~~2022~~2023 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director ~~Independence~~Independence.

Information required by this item will be included in the ~~2022~~2023 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

There are no Financial Statement Schedules filed as part of this Annual Report on 10-K, as the required information is not applicable.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the city of New York, state of New York on March 2, ~~2022.~~2023.

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Richard R. Hough III and Scott A. Gerard his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power to act separately and full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and all other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or his substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on the 2nd day of March, ~~2022:~~2023:

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, ~~2021,~~2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, ~~2021,~~2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2021,~~2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 2, ~~2022,~~2023, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Fair Value Adjustment - Cortina Contingent Consideration — Refer to ~~Notes 2 and~~Note 3 to the financial statements

The Company completed the acquisition of Cortina Asset Management, LLC (“Cortina”) on July 1, 2019 for cash consideration of $33.577 million and ~~$8.592~~$8.952 in Class B Units of Silvercrest L.P. In addition, the purchase agreement ~~provides~~provided for up to $26.209 million of potential earn out payments (“contingent consideration”) over ~~the next~~ four years.

A fair value adjustment to contingent purchase price consideration of ($11,780) million was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2022. The Company recognized the estimated contingent consideration for Cortina at fair value ~~on the acquisition date in the amount of $13.8 million and~~ at year end in the amount of ~~$16.3 million,~~$2 thousand, using the income approach.

The ~~fair value of earnout payments are~~change in the Company’s contingent consideration is based on revenue growth, however the payoffs are nonlinear and path-dependent. Accordingly, the Monte Carlo Simulation model is used. Furthermore, the significant inputs used in establishing the fair value include revenue growth rate, discount rate, and volatility rate. These are unobservable and reflect the Company’s own judgements about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the liability.

~~Therefore, the valuation~~These judgments resulted in a significant fair value adjustment of the Cortina contingent ~~consideration is considered complex and requires significant management judgment.~~consideration.

Our audit procedures related to the Cortina contingent consideration included the following:

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.:

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, ~~2021,~~2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2021,~~2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, ~~2021,~~2022, of the Company and our report dated March 2, ~~2022,~~2023, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


	December 31, 2021			December 31, 2020		December 31, 2022			December 31, 2021
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	85,744		$	62,498	$	77,432		$	85,744
Investments		1,588			914		146			1,588
Receivables, net		8,850			8,341		9,118			8,850
Due from Silvercrest Funds		428			1,018		577			428
Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements, net		5,257			5,523		5,021			5,257
Goodwill		63,675			63,675		63,675			63,675
Operating lease assets		26,130			30,068		23,653			26,130
Finance lease assets		247			254		342			247
Intangible assets, net		23,924			26,553		21,349			23,924
Deferred tax asset—tax receivable agreement		10,797			11,397		6,915			10,797
Prepaid expenses and other assets		2,678			3,563		4,447			2,678
Total assets	$	229,318		$	213,804	$	212,675		$	229,318
Liabilities and Equity
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	19,820		$	18,040	$	1,704		$	19,820
Accrued compensation		41,707			33,849		39,734			41,707
Borrowings under credit facility		9,025			12,600		6,337			9,025
Operating lease liabilities		32,371			36,127		29,552			32,371
Finance lease liabilities		253			259		344			253
Deferred tax and other liabilities		9,334			9,530		9,172			9,334
Total liabilities		112,510			110,405		86,843			112,510
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 10)
Equity
Preferred Stock, par value $0.01, 10,000,000 shares authorized; NaN issued and outstanding		—			—
Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 9,902,184 and 9,869,101 issued and outstanding, respectively, as of December 31, 2021; 9,650,692 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2020		99			96
Class B Common Stock, par value $0.01, 25,000,000 shares authorized; 4,593,687 and 4,721,646 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively		45			46
Preferred Stock, par value $0.01, 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding							—			—
Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 10,068,369 and 9,559,587 issued and outstanding, respectively, as of December 31, 2022; 9,902,184 and 9,869,101 issued and outstanding, respectively, as of December 31, 2021							101			99
Class B Common Stock, par value $0.01, 25,000,000 shares authorized; 4,545,380 and 4,593,687 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively							44			45
Additional Paid-In Capital		52,936			51,039		53,982			52,936
Treasury stock, at cost, 33,083 and 0 shares as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively		(512	)		—
Treasury stock, at cost, 508,782 and 33,083 shares as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively							(9,295	)		(512	)
Retained earnings		27,782			19,498		39,761			27,782
Total Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.’s equity		80,350			70,679		84,593			80,350
Non-controlling interests		36,458			32,720		41,239			36,458
Total equity		116,808			103,399		125,832			116,808
Total liabilities and equity	$	229,318		$	213,804	$	212,675		$	229,318

1. ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS

Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (“Silvercrest”), together with its consolidated subsidiary, Silvercrest L.P., a limited partnership, (collectively the “Company”), was formed as a Delaware corporation on July 11, 2011. Silvercrest is a holding company that was formed in order to carry on the business of Silvercrest L.P., the managing member of our operating subsidiary, and its subsidiaries. Effective on June 26, 2013, Silvercrest became the sole general partner of Silvercrest L.P. and its only material asset is the general partner interest in Silvercrest L.P., represented by ~~9,869,101~~9,559,587 Class A units or approximately ~~67.1~~67.4% of the outstanding interests of Silvercrest L.P. Silvercrest controls all of the businesses and affairs of Silvercrest L.P. and, through Silvercrest L.P. and its subsidiaries, continues to conduct the business previously conducted by these entities prior to the reorganization.

Silvercrest L.P., together with its consolidated subsidiaries (collectively “SLP”), provides investment management and family office services to individuals and families and their trusts, and to endowments, foundations and other institutional investors primarily located in the United States of America. The business includes the management of funds of funds and other investment funds, collectively referred to as the “Silvercrest Funds”.

Silvercrest L.P. was formed on December 10, 2008 and commenced operations on January 1, 2009.

On March 11, 2004, Silvercrest Asset Management Group LLC (“SAMG LLC”) acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of James C. Edwards Asset Management, Inc. (“JCE”) and subsequently changed JCE’s name to Silvercrest Financial Services, Inc. (“SFS”). On December 31, 2004, SLP acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of the LongChamp Group, Inc. (now SAM Alternative Solutions, Inc.) (“LGI”). Effective March 31, 2005, SLP entered into an Asset Contribution Agreement with and acquired all of the assets, properties, rights and certain liabilities of Heritage Financial Management, LLC (“HFM”). Effective October 3, 2008, SLP acquired 100% of the outstanding limited liability company interests of Marathon Capital Group, LLC (“MCG”) through a limited liability company interest purchase agreement dated September 22, 2008. On November 1, 2011, SLP acquired certain assets of Milbank Winthrop & Co. (“Milbank”). On April 1, 2012, SLP acquired 100% of the outstanding limited liability company interests of MW Commodity Advisors, LLC (“Commodity Advisors”). On March 28, 2013, SLP acquired certain assets of Ten-Sixty Asset Management, LLC (“Ten-Sixty”). On June 30, 2015, SLP acquired certain assets of Jamison, Eaton & Wood, Inc. (“Jamison”). On January 11, 2016, SLP acquired certain assets of Cappiccille & Company, LLC (“Cappiccille”). On January 1, 2019, SLP acquired certain assets of Neosho Capital LLC (“Neosho”). On July 1, 2019, SLP acquired substantially all assets of Cortina Asset Management (“Cortina”). See Notes 3, 7 and 8 for additional information related to the acquisition, goodwill and intangible assets arising from these acquisitions.

Tax Receivable Agreement

In connection with Silvercrest’s initial public offering (the “IPO”) and reorganization of SLP that was completed on June 23, 2013, Silvercrest entered into a tax receivable agreement (the “TRA”) with the partners of SLP that requires it to pay them 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax that it actually realizes (or is deemed to realize in the case of an early termination payment by it, or a change in control) as a result of the increases in tax basis and certain other tax benefits related to entering into the TRA, including tax benefits attributable to payments under the TRA or attributable to exchanges of shares of Class B common stock for shares of Class A common stock. The payments to be made pursuant to the tax receivable agreement are a liability of Silvercrest and not Silvercrest L.P. As of December 31, ~~2021~~2022 this liability is estimated to be $~~9,224~~8,877 and is included in deferred tax and other liabilities in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Silvercrest expects to benefit from the remaining 15% of cash savings realized, if any.

The TRA was effective upon the consummation of the IPO and will continue until all such tax benefits have been utilized or expired, unless Silvercrest exercises its right to terminate the TRA for an amount based on an agreed upon value of the payments remaining to be made under the agreement. The TRA will automatically terminate with respect to Silvercrest’s obligations to a partner if a partner (i) is terminated for cause, (ii) breaches his or her non-solicitation covenants with Silvercrest or any of its subsidiaries or (iii) voluntarily resigns or retires and competes with Silvercrest or any of its subsidiaries in the 12-month period following resignation of employment or retirement, and no further payments will be made to such partner under the TRA.

~~F-10~~F-11

For purposes of the TRA, cash savings in income tax will be computed by comparing Silvercrest’s actual income tax liability to the amount of such taxes that it would have been required to pay had there been no increase in its share of the tax basis of the tangible and intangible assets of SLP.

Estimating the amount of payments that Silvercrest may be required to make under the TRA is imprecise by nature, because the actual increase in its share of the tax basis, as well as the amount and timing of any payments under the TRA, will vary depending upon a number of factors, including:

•

the timing of exchanges of Silvercrest’s Class B units for shares of Silvercrest’s Class A common stock—for instance, the increase in any tax deductions will vary depending on the fair market value, which may fluctuate over time, of the depreciable and amortizable assets of SLP at the time of the exchanges;

•

the price of Silvercrest’s Class A common stock at the time of exchanges of Silvercrest’s Class B units—the increase in Silvercrest’s share of the basis in the assets of SLP, as well as the increase in any tax deductions, will be related to the price of Silvercrest’s Class A common stock at the time of these exchanges;

•

the extent to which these exchanges are taxable—if an exchange is not taxable for any reason (for instance, if a principal who holds Class B units exchanges units in order to make a charitable contribution), increased deductions will not be available;

•

the tax rates in effect at the time Silvercrest utilizes the increased amortization and depreciation deductions; and

•

the amount and timing of Silvercrest’s income—Silvercrest will be required to pay ~~85%~~85% of the tax savings, as and when realized, if any. If Silvercrest does not have taxable income, it generally will not be required to make payments under the TRA for that taxable year because no tax savings will have been actually realized.

For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019,~~2020, the valuation adjustment to the TRA related to the underlying deferred tax assets was $~~114~~202, $~~186~~114 and $~~200~~186, respectively, and is included in Other income (expense), net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

In addition, the TRA provides that, upon certain mergers, asset sales, other forms of business combinations or other changes of control, Silvercrest’s (or its successors’) obligations with respect to exchanged or acquired Class B units (whether exchanged or acquired before or after such transaction) would be based on certain assumptions, including that Silvercrest would have sufficient taxable income to fully utilize the deductions arising from the increased tax deductions and tax basis and other benefits related to entering into the TRA.

Decisions made by the continuing partners of SLP in the course of running Silvercrest’s business, such as with respect to mergers, asset sales, other forms of business combinations or other changes in control, may influence the timing and amount of payments that are received by an exchanging or selling principal under the TRA. For example, the earlier disposition of assets following an exchange or acquisition transaction will generally accelerate payments under the TRA and increase the present value of such payments, and the disposition of assets before an exchange or acquisition transaction will increase an existing owner’s tax liability without giving rise to any rights of a principal to receive payments under the TRA.

Were the IRS to successfully challenge the tax basis increases described above, Silvercrest would not be reimbursed for any payments previously made under the TRA. As a result, in certain circumstances, Silvercrest could make payments under the TRA in excess of its actual cash savings in income tax. For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019,~~2020, Silvercrest made TRA payments totaling $~~669~~763, $~~610~~669 and $~~583~~610, respectively.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Silvercrest and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, SLP, SAMG LLC, SFS, MCG, Silvercrest Investors LLC, Silvercrest Investors II LLC and Silvercrest Investors III LLC as of and for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019.~~2020. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

The Company evaluates for consolidation those entities it controls through a majority voting interest or otherwise, including those Silvercrest Funds over which the general partner or equivalent is presumed to have control, e.g. by virtue of the limited partners not being able to remove the general partner. The initial step in the Company’s determination of whether a fund for which SLP is the general partner is required to be consolidated is assessing whether the fund is a variable interest entity or a voting interest entity.

SLP then considers whether the fund is a voting interest entity (“VoIE”) in which the unaffiliated limited partners have substantive “kick-out” rights that provide the ability to dissolve (liquidate) the limited partnership or otherwise remove the general partner without cause. SLP considers the “kick-out” rights to be substantive if the general partner for the fund can be removed by the vote of a simple majority of the unaffiliated limited partners and there are no significant barriers to the unaffiliated limited partners’ ability to exercise these rights in that among other things, (1) there are no conditions or timing limits on when the rights can be exercised, (2) there are no financial or operational barriers associated with replacing the general partner, (3) there are a number of qualified replacement investment advisors that would accept appointment at the same fee level, (4) each fund’s documents provide for the ability to call and conduct a vote, and (5) the information necessary to exercise the kick-out rights and related vote are available from the fund and its administrator.

If the fund is a variable interest entity, SLP then determines whether it has a variable interest in the fund, and if so, whether SLP is the primary beneficiary. In determining whether SLP is the primary beneficiary, SLP evaluates its control rights as well as economic interests in the entity held either directly or indirectly by SLP. The consolidation analysis can generally be performed qualitatively; however, if it is not readily apparent that SLP is not the primary beneficiary, a quantitative analysis may also be performed. Amendments to the governing documents of the respective Silvercrest Funds could affect an entity’s status as a VIE or the determination of the primary beneficiary. At each reporting date, SLP assesses whether it is the primary beneficiary and will consolidate or deconsolidate accordingly.

As of December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020~~2021 and for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019,~~2020, each fund is deemed to be a VoIE and neither SLP nor Silvercrest consolidated any of the Silvercrest Funds.

Non-controlling interest

As of December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, Silvercrest holds approximately ~~67.5~~66.8% and ~~66.8~~67.5%, respectively, of the economic interests in SLP. Silvercrest is the sole general partner of SLP and, therefore, controls the management of SLP. As a result, Silvercrest consolidates the financial position and the results of operations of SLP and its subsidiaries, and records a non-controlling interest, as a separate component of equity on its Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition for the remaining economic interests in SLP. The non-controlling interest in the income or loss of SLP is included in the Consolidated Statement of Operations as a reduction or addition to net income derived from SLP.

Segment Reporting

The Company views its operations as comprising 1one operating segment, the investment management industry. Each of the Company’s acquired businesses have similar economic characteristics and have been fully integrated upon acquisition. Furthermore, our chief operating decision maker, which is the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, monitors and reviews financial information at a consolidated level for assessing operating results and the allocation of resources.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenues, expenses and other income reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates and assumptions made by management include the fair value of acquired assets and liabilities, determination of equity-based compensation, accounting for income taxes, determination of the useful lives of long-lived assets and other matters that affect the Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.

~~F-12~~F-13

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid securities with original maturities of 90 days or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Equity Method Investments

The Company accounts for investment activities related to entities over which the Company exercises significant influence but do not meet the requirements for consolidation, using the equity method of accounting, whereby the Company records its share of the underlying income or losses of these entities. Intercompany profit arising from transactions with affiliates is eliminated to the extent of its beneficial interest. Equity in losses of equity method investments is not recognized after the carrying value of an investment, including advances and loans, has been reduced to 0zero, unless guarantees or other funding obligations exist.

The Company evaluates its equity method investments for impairment, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of such investments may not be recoverable. The difference between the carrying value of the equity method investment and its estimated fair value is recognized as an impairment when the loss in value is deemed other than temporary. The Company’s equity method investments approximate their fair value at December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020.~~2021. The fair value of the equity method investments is estimated based on the Company’s share of the fair value of the net assets of the equity method investee. ~~NaN~~No impairment charges related to equity method investments were recorded during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019 .~~2020.

Receivables and Due from Silvercrest Funds

Receivables consist primarily of amounts for management and advisory fees, performance fees and allocations and family office service fees due from clients, and are stated as net realizable value. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful receivables based on estimates of expected losses and specific identification of uncollectible accounts. The Company charges actual losses to the allowance when incurred.

Furniture, Equipment and Leasehold Improvements

Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements consist primarily of furniture, fixtures and equipment, computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements and are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are calculated using the straight-line method over the assets’ estimated useful lives, which for leasehold improvements is the lesser of the lease term or the life of the asset, generally 10 years, and 3 to 7 years for other fixed assets.

Business Combinations

The Company accounts for business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting. The acquisition method of accounting requires that purchase price, including the fair value of contingent consideration, of the acquisition be allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed using the fair values determined by management as of the acquisition date. The method for determining relative fair value varied depending on the type of asset or liability and involved management making significant estimates related to assumptions such as future growth rates used to produce financial projections and the selection of unobservable inputs and other assumptions. The inputs used in establishing the fair value are in most cases unobservable and reflect the Company's own judgments about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Contingent consideration is recorded as part of the purchase price when such contingent consideration is not based on continuing employment of the selling shareholders. Contingent consideration that is related to continuing employment is recorded as compensation expense. Payments made for contingent consideration recorded as part of an acquisition’s purchase price are reflected as financing activities in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

The Company remeasures the fair value of contingent consideration at each reporting period using a probability-adjusted discounted cash flow method based on significant inputs not observable in the market and any change in the fair value from either the passage of time or events occurring after the acquisition date, is recorded in earnings. Contingent consideration payments that exceed the acquisition date fair value of the contingent consideration are reflected as an operating activity in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

~~F-13~~F-14

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill consists of the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill is not amortized but is evaluated for impairment at least annually, on October 1st of each year, or whenever events or circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred.

The Company accounts for goodwill under Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) No. 350, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other,” which provides an entity the option to first perform a qualitative assessment of whether a reporting unit’s fair value is more likely than not less than its carrying value, including goodwill. In performing its qualitative assessment, an entity considers the extent to which adverse events or circumstances identified, such as changes in economic conditions, industry and market conditions or entity specific events, could affect the comparison of the reporting unit’s fair value with its carrying amount. If an entity concludes that the fair value of a reporting unit is more likely than not less than its carrying amount, the entity is required to perform the currently prescribed two-step goodwill impairment test to identify potential goodwill impairment and, accordingly, measure the amount, if any, of goodwill impairment loss to be recognized for that reporting unit. The Company utilized this option when performing its annual impairment assessment in 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019,~~2020, and concluded that its single reporting unit’s fair value was more likely than not greater than its carrying value, including goodwill.

The Company has 1one reporting unit at December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020.~~2021. ~~NaN~~No goodwill impairment charges were recorded during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019.~~2020.

Intangible assets of the Company are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the net carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. In connection with such review, the Company also re-evaluates the periods of amortization for these assets. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to undiscounted future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds their fair value.

Identifiable finite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 20 years. The method of amortization is based on the pattern over which the economic benefits, generally expected undiscounted cash flows, of the intangible asset are consumed. Intangible assets for which no pattern can be reliably determined are amortized using the straight-line method. Intangible assets consist primarily of the contractual right to future management, advisory and performance fees from customer contracts or relationships.

Long-lived Assets

Long-lived assets of the Company are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the net carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. In connection with such review, the Company also re-evaluates the periods of depreciation and amortization for these assets. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to undiscounted future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds their fair value.

F-15

Treasury Stock

On July 29, 2021, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had approved a share repurchase program authorizing the Company to repurchase up to $15,000,000 of the Company’s outstanding Class A common stock (the “Repurchase Program”). Repurchases under the Repurchase Program may be made using either cash on hand, borrowings under the Company’s existing credit facilities or other sources, or (a) one or more 10b5-1 share trading plans, to be established with one or more banks or brokers (the “Trading Plans”), (b) pursuant to accelerated share repurchase programs with one or more investment banks or other financial intermediaries (the “ASR Programs”), or (c) through repurchases to be made outside of the Trading Plans or ASR Programs but in compliance with all applicable requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), including the safe harbor provided by Exchange Act Rule 10b-18, and consummated during an open trading window under the Company’s

~~F-14~~

insider trading policy. The program may be amended, suspended, or discontinued at any time and does not commit the Company to repurchase any shares of Common Stock.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company had purchased 508,782 and 33,083 shares, respectively, of Class A common stock for an aggregate price of approximately $9,295 and $512., respectively.

Treasury stock is accounted for under the cost method and is included as a deduction from equity in the Company’s Equity section of the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition. Upon any subsequent retirement or resale, the treasury stock account is reduced by the cost of such stock.

Partner Distributions

Partner incentive allocations, which are determined by the general partner, can be formula-based or discretionary. Partner incentive allocations are treated as compensation expense and recognized in the period in which they are earned. In the event there is insufficient distributable cash flow to make incentive distributions, the general partner in its sole and absolute discretion may determine not to make any distributions called for under the partnership agreement. The remaining net income or loss after partner incentive allocations is generally allocated to unit holders based on their pro rata ownership.

Redeemable Partnership Units

If a principal of SLP is terminated for cause, SLP has the right to redeem all of the vested Class B units collectively held by the principal and his or her permitted transferees for a purchase price equal to the lesser of (i) the aggregate capital account balance in SLP of the principal and his or her permitted transferees or (ii) the purchase price paid by the terminated principal to first acquire the Class B units.

SLP also makes distributions to its partners of various nature including incentive payments, profit distributions and tax distributions. The profit distributions and tax distributions are accounted for as equity transactions.

Class A Common Stock

The Company’s Class A stockholders are entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of the Company’s stockholders. Also, Class A stockholders are entitled to receive dividends, when and if declared by the Company’s board of directors, out of funds legally available therefor, subject to any statutory or contractual restrictions on the payment of dividends and to any restrictions on the payment of dividends imposed by the terms of any outstanding preferred stock. Dividends consisting of shares of Class A common stock may be paid only as follows: (i) shares of Class A common stock may be paid only to holders of shares of Class A common stock and (ii) shares will be paid proportionately with respect to each outstanding share of the Company’s Class A common stock. Upon the Company’s liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, or the sale of all, or substantially all, of the Company’s assets, after payment in full of all amounts required to be paid to creditors and to holders of preferred stock having a liquidation preference, if any, the Class A stockholders will be entitled to share ratably in the Company’s remaining assets available for distribution to Class A stockholders. Class B units of SLP held by principals will be exchangeable for shares of the Company’s Class A common stock, on a one-for-one basis, subject to customary adjustments for share splits, dividends and reclassifications.

F-16

Class B Common Stock

Shares of the Company’s Class B common stock are issuable only in connection with the issuance of Class B units of SLP. When a vested or unvested Class B unit is issued by SLP, the Company will issue the holder one share of its Class B common stock in exchange for the payment of its par value. Each share of the Company’s Class B common stock will be redeemed for its par value and cancelled by the Company if the holder of the corresponding Class B unit exchanges or forfeits its Class B unit pursuant to the terms of the Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of SLP and the terms of the Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2012 Equity Incentive Plan”). The Company’s Class B stockholders will be entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of the Company’s stockholders. The Company’s Class B stockholders will not participate in any dividends declared by the Company’s board of directors. Upon the Company’s liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, or the sale of all, or substantially all, of its assets, Class B stockholders only will be entitled to receive the par value of the Company’s Class B common stock.

~~F-15~~

Revenue Recognition

The Company generates revenue from management and advisory fees, performance fees and allocations, and family office services fees. Management and advisory fees and performance fees and allocations are generated by managing assets on behalf of separate accounts and acting as investment adviser for various investment funds. Performance fees and allocations also relate to assets managed in external investment strategies in which the Company has a revenue sharing arrangement and in funds in which the Company has no partnership interest. Management and advisory fees and family office services fees income is recognized through the course of the period in which these services are provided. Income from performance fees and allocations is recorded at the conclusion of the contractual performance period when all contingencies are resolved. In certain arrangements, the Company is only entitled to receive performance fees and allocations when the return on assets under management exceeds certain benchmark returns or other performance targets.

The discretionary investment management agreements for the Company’s separately managed accounts do not have a specified term. Rather, each agreement may be terminated by either party at any time, unless otherwise agreed with the client, upon written notice of termination to the other party. The investment management agreements for the Company’s private funds are generally in effect from year to year, and may be terminated at the end of any year (or, in certain cases, on the anniversary of execution of the agreement) (i) by the Company upon 30 or 90 days’ prior written notice and (ii) after receiving the affirmative vote of a simple majority of the investors in the private fund that are not affiliated with the Company, by the private fund on 60 or 90 days’ prior written notice. The investment management agreements for the private funds may also generally be terminated effective immediately by either party where the non-terminating party (i) commits a material breach of the terms subject, in certain cases, to a cure period, (ii) is found to have committed fraud, gross negligence or willful misconduct or (iii) terminates, becomes bankrupt, becomes insolvent or dissolves. Each of the Company’s investment management agreements contains customary indemnification obligations from the Company to their clients.

The management and advisory fees are primarily driven by the level of the Company’s assets under management. The assets under management increase or decrease based on the net inflows or outflows of funds into the Company’s various investment strategies and the investment performance of their clients’ accounts. In order to increase the Company’s assets under management and expand their business, the Company must develop and market investment strategies that suit the investment needs of their target clients and provide attractive returns over the long term. The Company’s ability to continue to attract clients will depend on a variety of factors including, among others:

•

the ability to educate the Company’s target clients about the Company’s classic value investment strategies and provide them with exceptional client service;

•

the relative investment performance of the Company’s investment strategies, as compared to competing products and market indices;

•

competitive conditions in the investment management and broader financial services sectors;

•

investor sentiment and confidence; and

•

The decision to close strategies when the Company deems it to be in the best interests of their clients.

F-17

The majority of management and advisory fees that the Company earns on separately-managed accounts are based on the value of assets under management on the last day of each calendar quarter. Most of the management and advisory fees are billed quarterly in advance on the first day of each calendar quarter. The Company’s basic annual fee schedule for management of clients’ assets in separately managed accounts is generally: (i) for managed equity or balanced portfolios, 1% of the first $10 million and 0.60% on the balance, (ii) for managed fixed income only portfolios, 0.40% on the first $10 million and 0.30% on the balance, (iii) for the municipal value strategy, 0.65%, (iv) for Cortina equity portfolios, 1.0% on the first $25 million, 0.90% on the next $25 million and 0.80% on the balance and (v) for outsourced chief investment officer portfolios, 0.40% on the first $50 million, 0.32% on the next $50 million and 0.24% on the balance. The Company’s fee for monitoring non-discretionary assets can range from 0.05% to 0.01%, but can also be incorporated into an agreed-upon fixed family office service fee. The majority of the Company’s client relationships pay a blended fee rate since they are invested in multiple strategies.

Management fees earned on investment funds that the Company advises are calculated primarily based on the net assets of the funds. Some funds calculate investment fees based on the net assets of the funds as of the last business day of each calendar quarter, whereas other funds calculate investment fees based on the value of net assets on the first business day of the month. Depending on the investment fund, fees are paid either quarterly in advance or quarterly in arrears. For the Company’s private funds, the fees range from 0.25% to 1.5% annually. Certain management fees earned on investment funds for which the Company performs risk management and due diligence services are based on flat fee agreements customized for each engagement.

~~F-16~~

The Company’s management and advisory fees may fluctuate based on a number of factors, including the following:

•

changes in assets under management due to appreciation or depreciation of their investment portfolios, and the levels of the contribution and withdrawal of assets by new and existing clients;

•

allocation of assets under management among their investment strategies, which have different fee schedules;

•

allocation of assets under management between separately managed accounts and advised funds, for which the Company generally earn lower overall management and advisory fees; and

•

the level of their performance with respect to accounts and funds on which the Company is paid incentive fees.

The Company’s performance fees and allocations may fluctuate based on performance with respect to accounts and funds on which the Company is paid incentive fees and allocations.

The Company’s family office services capabilities enable us to provide comprehensive and integrated services to their clients. The Company’s dedicated group of tax and financial planning professionals provide financial planning, tax planning and preparation, partnership accounting and fund administration and consolidated wealth reporting among other services. Family office services income fluctuates based on both the number of clients for whom the Company performs these services and the level of agreed-upon fees, most of which are flat fees. Therefore, non-discretionary assets under management, which are associated with family office services, do not typically serve as the basis for the amount of family office services revenue that is recognized. Family office services fees are also typically billed quarterly in advance at the beginning of the quarter or in arrears after the end of the quarter based on a contractual percentage of the assets managed or upon a contractually agreed-upon flat fee arrangement. Revenue is recognized on a ratable basis over the period in which services are performed.

The Company accounts for performance-based revenue in accordance with ASC 606 by recognizing performance fees and allocations as revenue only when it is certain that the fee income is earned and payable pursuant to the relevant agreements. In certain arrangements, the Company is only entitled to receive performance fees and allocations when the return on assets under management exceeds certain benchmark returns or other performance targets. The Company records performance fees and allocations as a component of revenue once the performance fee which is recognized at a point in time upon crystallization of the performance fee. As a result, there is no estimate or variability in the consideration when revenue is recorded.

Equity-Based Compensation

Equity-based compensation costs relating to the issuance of share-based awards to employees are based on the fair value of the award at the date of grant, which is expensed ratably over the requisite service period, net of estimated forfeitures. The forfeiture assumption is ultimately adjusted to the actual forfeiture rate. Therefore, changes in the forfeiture assumptions may affect the timing of the total amount of expense recognized over the vesting period. The service period is the period over which the employee performs the related services, which is normally the same as the vesting period. Equity-based awards that do not require future service are expensed immediately. Equity-based awards that have the potential to be settled in cash at the election of the employee are classified as liabilities (“Liability Awards”) and are adjusted to fair value at the end of each reporting period.

F-18

Leases

The Company accounts for leases under ASU No. 2016-02, “Topic 842, Leases” (“ASC 842”), which requires lessees to recognize leases on-balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. ASC 842 established a right-of-use model (“ROU”) that requires a lessee to recognize a ROU asset and lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with a term longer than 12 months. Leases are classified as finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern and classification of expense recognition in the ~~consolidated statement~~Consolidated Statement of ~~operations.~~Operations.

Income Taxes

Silvercrest and SFS are subject to federal and state corporate income tax, which requires an asset and liability approach to the financial accounting and reporting of income taxes. SLP is not subject to federal and state income taxes, since all income, gains and losses are passed through to its partners. SLP is, however, subject to New York City unincorporated business tax. With respect to the Company’s incorporated entities, the annual tax rate is based on the income, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available in the various jurisdictions in which the Company operates. Tax laws are complex and subject to different interpretations by the taxpayer and respective governmental taxing authorities. Judgment is required in determining the tax expense and in evaluating tax positions. The tax effects of any uncertain tax position (“UTP”) taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns are recognized only if it is “more likely-than-not” to be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on its technical merits as of the reporting date. The tax

~~F-17~~

benefits recognized in the consolidated financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company recognizes estimated accrued interest and penalties related to UTPs in income tax expense.

The Company recognizes the benefit of a UTP in the period when it is effectively settled. Previously recognized tax positions are derecognized in the first period in which it is no longer more likely than not that the tax position would be sustained upon examination.

Recent Accounting Developments

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Accounting for Credit Losses” which amends the Board’s guidance on the impairment of financial instruments. The ASU adds to U.S. GAAP an impairment model (known as the current expected credit loss (CECL) model) that is based on expected losses rather than incurred losses. Under the new guidance, an entity recognizes as an allowance its estimate of expected credit losses, which the FASB believes will result in more timely recognition of such losses. This amendment became effective for the Company on January 1, 2020. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, “Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That is a Service Contract.” The ASU provides guidance for entities to evaluate the accounting for fees paid by a customer in a cloud computing arrangement which includes a software license. ASU 2018-15 became effective for the Company on January 1, 2020. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, “Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting” which applies to all entities, subject to meeting certain criteria, that have contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform. This ASU is effective for all public entities beginning March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. The ~~Company expects the~~ adoption of this ~~guidance will not~~ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

3. ACQUISITIONS

Cortina:

On April 12, 2019, SAMG LLC and SLP entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Cortina Asset Management, LLC, a Wisconsin limited liability company (“Cortina”), and certain interest holders of Cortina (together, the “Principals of Cortina”) to acquire, directly or through a designated affiliate, substantially all of the assets of Cortina relating to Cortina’s business of providing investment management, investment advisory, and related services (the “Cortina Acquisition”).

Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Purchase Agreement, SAMG LLC agreed to pay to Cortina an aggregate maximum amount of $44,937, 80% of which was agreed to be paid in cash at closing by SAMG LLC, and 20% of which was agreed to be paid by SLP in the form of issuance and delivery to certain Principals at closing of Class B Units in SLP, in each case subject to certain adjustments as described in the Purchase Agreement.

F-19

On July 1, 2019, the acquisition was completed pursuant to the Purchase Agreement. At closing, SAMG LLC paid to Cortina an aggregate principal amount of $33,577 in cash, and SLP paid an additional $8,952, in the form of issuance and delivery to certain Principals of 662,713 Class B Units in SLP. The $33,577 paid in cash represented $35,072 in consideration, partially offset by net closing credits due to SAMG LLC for reimbursable expenses from Cortina.

In addition, the Purchase Agreement provides for up to an additional $26,209 to be paid 80% in cash with certain Principals receiving the remaining 20% in the form of Class B Units of SLP in potential earn-out payments over the next four years. SAMG LLC determined that the preliminary fair value of contingent consideration pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement whereby the sellers of Cortina are potentially entitled to two retention payments and one growth payment contingent upon the achievement of various revenue targets is $13,800. The estimated fair value of contingent consideration is recognized at the date of acquisition, and adjusted for changes in facts and circumstances until the ultimate resolution of the contingency. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration are reflected as a component of general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The income approach was used to determine the fair value of these payments, by estimating a range of likely expected outcomes and payouts given these outcomes. The potential payouts were estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation and discounted back to their present values using a risk-free discount rate adjusted to account for SAMG LLC’s credit or counterparty risk to arrive at the present value of the contingent consideration payments. The discount rate for the contingent consideration payments was based on the revenue cost of capital for Cortina’s revenue.

~~F-18~~

The first retention payment, due if revenue for the 12-month period from July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021 is greater than or equal to 95% of the acquired revenue of $13,027 which represents Cortina’s annual revenue run-rate as of closing (“Acquired Revenue”), is equal to $3,370. If revenue for the period is equal to 75% or less of the Acquired Revenue, there is 0no first retention payment, and if revenue for the period is between 75% and 95%, the first retention payment will be determined using linear interpolation between $0 and $3,370. Cortina’s revenue for the 12-month period from July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021 exceeded 95% of the acquired revenue of $13,027, therefore, a first retention payment of $3,370 was due as of June 30, 2021. The first retention payment was paid on July 30, 2021 in the form of $2,696 in cash and $674 in equity.

The second retention payment is based on revenue for the 12-month period from July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022, with a revenue threshold between 85% and 105% of Acquired Revenue and a maximum retention payment of $5,617. If revenue for the period is equal to 85% or less of the Acquired Revenue, there is 0no second retention payment, and if revenue for the period is between 85% and 105%, the second retention payment will be determined using linear interpolation between $0 and $5,617. Cortina’s revenue for the 12-month period from July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 exceeded 105% of the acquired revenue of $13,027, so therefore a second retention payment of $5,617 was due as of June 30, 2022. The second retention payment was paid on July 29, 2022 in the form of $4,494 in cash and $1,123 in equity.

The growth payment is based on revenue for the 12-month period from July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023, with a revenue threshold between 95% and 140% of Acquired Revenue and a maximum payment of $17,222. If revenue for the period is equal to 95% or less of the Acquired Revenue, there is 0no growth payment, and if revenue for the period is between 95% and 140%, the growth payment will be determined using linear interpolation between $0 and $17,222.

Fair value adjustments to contingent purchase price consideration of $($~~5,670~~11,780), $~~1,100~~5,670 and $~~200~~1,100 were recorded for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019,~~2020, respectively, and are included in general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the years then ended. SAMG LLC has a liability of $~~16,300~~2 and $~~15,100~~17,400 as of December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, respectively, for contingent consideration related to earnout payments to be made in conjunction with the Cortina Acquisition, which is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

In connection with their receipt of the equity consideration, the Principals of Cortina became subject to the rights and obligations set forth in the limited partnership agreement of SLP and are entitled to distributions consistent with SLP’s distribution policy. In addition, the Principals of Cortina became parties to the Exchange Agreement, which governs the exchange of Class B Units for Class A common stock of the Company, the Resale and Registration Rights Agreement, which provides the Principals of Cortina with liquidity with respect to shares of Class A common stock of the Company received in exchange for Class B Units, and the TRA of the Company, which entitles the Principals of Cortina to share in a portion of the tax benefit received by the Company upon the exchange of Class B Units for Class A common stock of the Company.

The Purchase Agreement includes customary representations, warranties and covenants.

The strategic acquisition of Cortina, a long-standing innovative and high-caliber growth equity asset management firm, establishes a growth equity capability for the Company. Furthermore, the Company gains investment professionals that have significant experience and knowledge of the industry and establishes a presence in the Midwest.

F-20

Cortina revenue and income before provision for income taxes for the twelve months ended December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020~~2021 that are included in the Consolidated Statement of Operations are $11,437 and $2,543, and $14,739 and $5,569, ~~and~~ $~~11,642and $3,016~~, respectively.

During ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, the Company incurred ~~$18~~$15 and ~~$90,~~$18, respectively, in costs related to the Cortina Acquisition, and has included these in general, administrative and other in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.


Cash paid on date of acquisition	$	17,072
Term loan with City National Bank drawdown		18,000
Units issued		8,952
Contingent consideration		13,800
Total purchase consideration	$	57,824

Cash paid on date of acquisition
$
17,072
Term loan with City National Bank drawdown

18,000
Units issued

8,952
Contingent consideration

13,800
Total purchase consideration
$
57,824

The Company accounted for the acquisition under the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations. Accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective fair values. The method for determining relative fair value varied depending on the type of asset or liability and involved management making significant estimates related to assumptions such as future growth rates used to produce financial projections for Cortina and the selection of unobservable inputs and other assumptions. The inputs used in establishing the fair value are in most cases unobservable and reflect

the Company's own judgments about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.

The purchase price allocations as presented above were finalized as of December 31, 2019.

The Company believes the recorded goodwill is supported by the anticipated revenues and expected synergies of integrating the operations of Cortina into the Company. Most of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

On December 13, 2018, the Company executed an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) by and among the Company, SLP, SAMG LLC (the “Buyer”) and Neosho Capital LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Neosho” or the “Seller”), and Christopher K. Richey, Alphonse I. Chan, Robert K. Choi and Vincent G. Pandes, each such individual a principal of Neosho (together, the “Principals of Neosho”), to acquire certain assets of Neosho. The transaction contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement closed on January 15, 2019 and is referred to herein as the “Neosho Acquisition”.

Pursuant to the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, SAMG LLC acquired substantially all of the business and assets of the Seller, a provider of investment management and advisory services, including goodwill and the benefit of the amortization of goodwill related to such assets. In consideration of the purchased assets and goodwill, SAMG LLC paid to the Seller and the Principal an aggregate purchase price consisting of (1) a cash payment of $399 (net of cash acquired) and (2) Class B units of SLP issued to the

Principals of Neosho with a value equal to $20 and an equal number of shares of Class B common stock of the Company, having voting rights but no economic interest. The Company determined that the acquisition-date fair value of the contingent consideration was $1,686, based on the likelihood that the financial and performance targets described in the Asset Purchase Agreement will be achieved. SAMG LLC made a payment of $300 to the Principals of Neosho on the first anniversary of the closing date. SAMG LLC will make earnout payments to the Principals of Neosho as soon as practicable following December 31, 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023, in an amount equal to the greater of (i) $100 and (ii) the product obtained by multiplying (x) 50% by (y) the revenue of Neosho as of such payment date less the revenue of Neosho as of the immediately preceding payment date for the prior year. Earnout payments will be paid 75% in cash and 25% in equity. The estimated fair value of contingent consideration is recognized at the date of acquisition, and adjusted for changes in facts and circumstances until the ultimate resolution of the contingency. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration are reflected as a component of general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The fair value of the contingent consideration was based on discounted cash flow models using projected revenue for each earnout period. The discount rate applied to the projected revenue was determined based on the weighted average cost of capital for the Company and took into account that the overall risk associated with the payments was similar to the overall risks of the Company as there is no target, floor or cap associated with the contingent payments.

Fair value adjustments to contingent purchase price consideration of ($~~365~~299), ($75365) and ($~~283~~75) were recorded for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019,~~2020, respectively, and are included in general, and administrative expenses in the Consolidated

Statement of Operations for the years then ended. The Company has a liability of $~~563~~164 and $~~1,028~~563 for contingent consideration related to earnout payments to be made in conjunction with the Neosho Acquisition, which is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, ~~and 2020, respectively~~. respectively. During each of the years ended December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, the Company made contingent purchase price payments to Neosho of $100 in the form of $75 in cash and $~~300~~25~~, respectively.~~ in equity.

On December 15, 2015, the Company executed an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) by and among the Company, SLP, SAMG LLC (the “Buyer”) and Cappiccille & Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Cappiccille” or the “Seller”), and Michael Cappiccille (the “Principal”), to acquire certain assets of Cappiccille. The transaction contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement closed on January 11, 2016 and is referred to herein as the “Cappiccille Acquisition”.

Pursuant to the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, SAMG LLC acquired (i) substantially all of the business and assets of the Seller, a provider of tax services, including goodwill and the benefit of the amortization of goodwill related to such assets, and (ii) the personal goodwill of the Principal. In consideration of the purchased assets and goodwill, SAMG LLC paid to the Seller and the Principal an aggregate purchase price consisting of a cash payment of $148. The Company determined that the acquisition-date fair value of the contingent consideration was $354, based on the likelihood that the financial and performance targets described in the Asset Purchase Agreement will be achieved. SAMG LLC will make earnout payments to the Principal as soon as practicable following December 31, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, and during 2020, in an amount equal to 19% of the revenue attributable to the business and assets of Cappiccille, based on revenue gained or lost post-transaction during the twelve months ended on the applicable determination date, except that the earnout payment for 2016 shall be equal to 19% of the revenue attributable to the Cappiccille for the period between the closing date of the Cappiccille Acquisition and December 31, 2016 and the earnout payment for 2020 shall be equal to ~~19%~~19% of the revenue attributable to the Cappiccille Acquisition for the period between January 1, 2020 and the fifth anniversary of the closing date of the Cappiccille Acquisition. The estimated fair value of contingent consideration is recognized at the date of acquisition, and adjusted for changes in facts and circumstances until the ultimate resolution of the contingency. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration are reflected as a component of general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The fair value of the contingent consideration was based on discounted cash flow models using projected revenue for each earnout period. The discount rate applied to the projected revenue was determined based on the weighted average cost of capital for the Company and took into account that the overall risk associated with the payments was similar to the overall risks of the Company as there is no target, floor or cap associated the contingent payments.

Fair value adjustments to contingent purchase price consideration of $0, $0, $126 ~~and ($~~25) were recorded for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019,~~2020, respectively, and are included in general, and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year then ended. The Company has a liability of $0 ~~and $114~~for contingent consideration related to Cappiccille included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition as of December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, respectively. During the years ended December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, the Company made contingent purchase price payments to Cappiccille of $~~114~~0 and $~~113~~114, respectively.

On March 30, 2015, the Company executed an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”), by and among the Company, SLP, SAMG LLC (the “Buyer”) and Jamison Eaton & Wood, Inc., a New Jersey corporation (“Jamison” or the “Seller”), and Keith Wood, Ernest Cruikshank, III, William F. Gadsden and Frederick E. Thalmann, Jr., each such individual a principal of Jamison (together, the “Principals of Jamison”), to acquire certain assets of Jamison. The transaction contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement closed on June 30, 2015 and is referred to herein as the “Jamison Acquisition”.

Pursuant to the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, SAMG LLC acquired (i) substantially all of the business and assets of the Seller, an investment adviser, including goodwill and the benefit of the amortization of goodwill related to such assets and (ii) the personal goodwill of the Principals of Jamison. In consideration of the purchased assets and goodwill, SAMG LLC paid to the Seller and the Principals of Jamison an aggregate purchase price consisting of (1) cash payments in the aggregate amount of $3,550 (the “Closing Cash Payment”), (2) a promissory note issued to the Seller in the principal amount of $394, with an interest rate of 5% per annum (the “Seller Note”), (3) promissory notes in varying amounts issued to each of the Principals of Jamison for an aggregated total amount of $1,771, each with an interest rate of 5% per annum (together, the “Principals of Jamison Notes”) and (4) Class B units of SLP (the “Class B Units”) issued to the Principals of Jamison with a value equal to $3,562 and an equal number of shares of Class B common stock of the Company, having voting rights but no economic interest (together, the “Equity Consideration”). The Company determined that the acquisition-date fair value of the contingent consideration was $1,429, based on the likelihood that the financial and performance targets described in the Asset Purchase Agreement will be achieved. SAMG LLC will make earnout payments to the Principals of Jamison as soon as practicable following December 31, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 and during 2020, in an amount equal to 20% of the EBITDA attributable to the business and assets of Jamison (the “Jamison Business”), based on revenue gained or lost post-transaction during the twelve months ended on the applicable determination date, except that the earnout payment for 2015 shall be equal to ~~20%~~20% of the EBITDA attributable to the Jamison Business for the period between the closing date of the Jamison Acquisition and December 31, 2015 and the earnout payment for 2020 shall be equal to ~~20%~~20% of the EBITDA attributable to the Jamison Business for the period between January 1, 2020 and the fifth anniversary of the closing date of the Jamison Acquisition. The estimated fair value of contingent consideration is recognized at the date of acquisition, and adjusted for changes in facts and circumstances until the ultimate resolution of the contingency. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration are reflected as a component of general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The fair value of the contingent consideration was based on discounted cash flow models using projected EBITDA for each earnout period. The discount rate applied to the to the projected EBITDA was determined based on the weighted average cost of capital for the Company and took into account that the overall risk associated with the payments was similar to the overall risks of the Company as there is no target, floor or cap associated the contingent payments.

In connection with their receipt of the Equity Consideration, the Principals of Jamison became subject to the rights and obligations set forth in the limited partnership agreement of SLP and are entitled to distributions consistent with SLP’s distribution policy. In addition, the Principals of Jamison became parties to the Exchange Agreement, which governs the exchange of Class B Units for Class A common stock of the Company, the Resale and Registration Rights Agreement, which provides the Principals of Jamison with liquidity with respect to shares of Class A common stock of the Company received in exchange for Class B Units, and the TRA of the Company, which entitles the Principals of Jamison to share in a portion of the tax benefit received by the Company upon the exchange of Class B Units for Class A common stock of the Company.

The Asset Purchase Agreement includes customary representations, warranties and covenants.

The strategic acquisition of Jamison, a long-standing and highly regarded investment boutique, strengthens the Company’s presence in the greater New York market and the Company obtains investment managers that have significant experience and knowledge of the industry. Jamison’s clients will gain access to the Company’s complete investment management, wealth planning and reporting capabilities, including proprietary value equity and fixed income disciplines and alternative investment advisory services.

The Company believes the recorded goodwill is supported by the anticipated revenues and expected synergies of integrating the operations of Jamison into the Company. The goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

Fair value adjustments to contingent purchase price consideration of $0, $700 and $~~214~~70 were recorded for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019,~~2020, respectively, and are included in general, and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for each of the years then ended. The Company has a liability of $0 ~~and $160~~for contingent consideration related to Jamison included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition as of December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, respectively. During the years ended December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, the Company made contingent purchase price payments to Jamison of $~~160~~0 and $~~328~~160, respectively.

4. INVESTMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Investments include $~~1,588~~146 and $~~914~~1,588 as of December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, respectively, representing the Company’s equity method investments in affiliated investment funds which have been established and managed by the Company and its affiliates. The Company’s financial interest in these funds can range up to 2%. Despite the Company’s insignificant financial interest, the Company exercises significant influence over these funds as the Company typically serves as the general partner, managing member or equivalent for these funds. During 2007, the Silvercrest Funds granted rights to the unaffiliated investors in each respective fund to provide that a simple majority of the fund’s unaffiliated investors will have the right, without cause, to remove the general partner or equivalent of that fund or to accelerate the liquidation date of that fund in accordance with certain procedures. At December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, the Company determined that none of the Silvercrest Funds were required to be consolidated. The Company’s involvement with these entities began on the dates that they were formed, which range from July 2003 to July 2014.

Fair Value Measurements

GAAP establishes a hierarchal disclosure framework which prioritizes and ranks the level of market price observability used in measuring investments at fair value. Market price observability is affected by a number of factors, including the type of investment, the characteristics specific to the investment and the state of the marketplace including the existence and transparency of transactions between market participants. Investments with readily available active quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices in an orderly market generally will have a higher degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of judgment used in measuring fair value.

•

Level I: Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical investments as of the reporting date. The type of investments in Level I include listed equities and listed derivatives.

•

Level II: Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date, and fair value is determined through the use of models or other valuation methodologies. Investments which are generally included in Level II include corporate bonds and loans, less liquid and restricted equity securities, certain over-the counter derivatives, and certain fund of hedge funds investments in which the Company has the ability to redeem its investment at net asset value at, or within three months of, the reporting date.

•

Level III: Pricing inputs are unobservable for the investment and includes situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the investment. The inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation.

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the determination of which category within the fair value hierarchy is appropriate for any given investment is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the investment.

At December 31, ~~2020~~2022 and ~~2019,~~2021, the Company did 0not have any financial assets or liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, with the exception of the contingent consideration related to the acquisition earnouts.

Contingent Consideration

For business acquisitions, the Company recognizes the fair value of goodwill and other acquired intangible assets, and estimated contingent consideration at the acquisition date as part of purchase price. This fair value measurement is based on unobservable (Level 3) inputs.

The following table represents changes in the fair value of estimated contingent consideration for the years ended December 31, ~~2020~~2022 and 2021:


Balance at January 1, 2020	$	15,921
Additions to estimated contingent consideration		—
Payments of contingent consideration		(741	)
Non-cash changes in fair value of estimated contingent consideration		1,222
Balance at December 31, 2020		16,402
Balance at January 1, 2021					16,402
Additions to estimated contingent consideration		—			—
Payments of contingent consideration		(3,744	)		(3,744	)
Non-cash changes in fair value of estimated contingent consideration		5,305			5,305
Balance at December 31, 2021	$	17,963		$	17,963
Additions to estimated contingent consideration					—
Payments of contingent consideration					(5,717	)
Non-cash changes in fair value of estimated contingent consideration					(12,080	)
Balance at December 31, 2022				$	166

~~F-23~~F-24

Estimated contingent consideration is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Payments of contingent consideration are included in earn-outs paid related to acquisitions completed on or after January 1, 2009 in financing activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

In determining fair value of the estimated contingent consideration, the acquired business’ future performance is estimated using financial projections for the acquired business. These financial projections, as well as alternative scenarios of financial performance, are measured against the performance targets specified in each respective acquisition agreement. In addition, discount rates are established based on the cost of debt and the cost of equity. The Company uses the Monte Carlo Simulation Model to determine the fair value of the Company’s estimated contingent consideration.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s estimated contingent consideration are the forecasted growth rates over the measurement period and discount rates. Significant increases or decreases in the Company’s forecasted growth rates over the measurement period or discount rates would result in a higher or lower fair value measurement.

Inputs used in the fair value measurement of estimated contingent consideration at December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020~~2021 are summarized below:

Monte Carlo Simulation Model

December 31,
2021

December 31,
2020

Fair Value
Hierarchy

Fair Value

$
17,963

$
16,402

Level 3

Forecasted growth rate

16.70
%

16.40
%

Discount rate

10.74
%

11.70
%


Monte Carlo Simulation Model	December 31, 2022			December 31, 2021			Fair Value Hierarchy
Fair Value	$	166		$	17,963		Level 3
Forecasted growth rate		1.20	%		16.70	%
Discount rate		14.80	%		10.74	%

Please refer to Note 3. Acquisitions for more details on contingent consideration related to acquisition earnouts.

At December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, financial instruments that are not held at fair value are categorized in the table below:


	December 31, 2021				December 31, 2020							December 31, 2022				December 31, 2021
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Fair Value Hierarchy			Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Fair Value Hierarchy
Financial Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	85,744	$	85,744	$	62,498	$	62,498		Level I	(1)	$	77,432	$	77,432	$	85,744	$	85,744	Level I (1)
Investments	$	1,588	$	1,588	$	914	$	914		N/A	(2)	$	146	$	146	$	1,588	$	1,588	N/A (2)

Financial liabilities:
Borrowings under credit facility	$	9,000	$	9,000	$	12,600	$	12,600		Level II	(3)	$	6,300	$	6,300	$	9,000	$	9,000	Level II (3)

(1)

Includes $~~1,398~~1,416 and $1,398 of cash equivalents at December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, respectively, that fall under Level I in the fair value hierarchy.

(2)

Investments consist of the Company’s equity method investments in affiliated investment funds which have been established and managed by the Company and its affiliates. Fair value of investments is based on the net asset value of the affiliated investment funds which is a practical expedient for fair value, which is not included in the fair value hierarchy under GAAP.

(3)

The carrying value of borrowings under the revolving credit agreement and the contingent consideration related to acquisition earnouts approximate fair value, which is determined based on interest rates currently available to the Company for similar debt and the weighted average cost of capital of the Company.

Depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 ~~and 2019~~ was $1,191, $1,175, $~~1,117~~, and $~~978~~1,117, respectively.

During 2022, the Company wrote off leased assets with a cost of $194 and accumulated depreciation of $143. During 2021, the Company wrote off leased assets with a cost of $120 and accumulated depreciation of $95. ~~During 2020, the Company wrote off leased assets with a cost of $209~~ ~~and accumulated depreciation of $180~~.

8. INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The following is a summary of intangible assets as of December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and December 31, ~~2020:~~2021:


	Customer Relationships			Other Intangible Assets			Total			Customer Relationships			Other Intangible Assets			Total
Cost
Balance, January 1, 2022										$	44,060		$	2,461		$	46,521
Balance, December 31, 2022											44,060			2,461			46,521
Useful lives										10-20 years			3-5 years
Accumulated amortization
Balance, January 1, 2022											(20,136	)		(2,461	)		(22,597	)
Amortization expense											(2,575	)		—			(2,575	)
Balance, December 31, 2022											(22,711	)		(2,461	)		(25,172	)
Net book value										$	21,349		$	—		$	21,349
Cost
Balance, January 1, 2021	$	44,060		$	2,461		$	46,521		$	44,060		$	2,461		$	46,521
Balance, December 31, 2021		44,060			2,461			46,521			44,060			2,461			46,521
Useful lives		10-20 years			3-5 years					10-20 years			3-5 years
Accumulated amortization
Balance, January 1, 2021		(17,507	)		(2,461	)		(19,968	)		(17,507	)		(2,461	)		(19,968	)
Amortization expense		(2,629	)		—			(2,629	)		(2,629	)		—			(2,629	)
Balance, December 31, 2021		(20,136	)		(2,461	)		(22,597	)		(20,136	)		(2,461	)		(22,597	)
Net book value	$	23,924		$	—		$	23,924		$	23,924		$	—		$	23,924
Cost
Balance, January 1, 2020	$	44,060		$	2,467		$	46,527
Disposal		—			(6	)		(6	)
Balance, December 31, 2020		44,060			2,461			46,521
Useful lives		10-20 years			3-5 years
Accumulated amortization
Balance, January 1, 2020		(14,833	)		(2,408	)		(17,241	)
Amortization expense		(2,674	)		(59	)		(2,733	)
Disposal		—			6			6
Balance, December 31, 2020		(17,507	)		(2,461	)		(19,968	)
Net book value	$	26,553		$	—		$	26,553

F-26

Amortization expense related to intangible assets was $~~2,629~~2,575, $~~2,733~~2,629 and $~~2,107~~2,733 for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019,~~2020, respectively.

Amortization related to the Company’s finite life intangible assets is scheduled to be expensed over the next five years and thereafter as follows:


2022	$	2,575
2023		2,416	$	2,416
2024		2,289		2,289
2025		2,193		2,193
2026		1,832		1,832
2027				1,828
Thereafter		12,619		10,791
Total	$	23,924	$	21,349

10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Lease Commitments

The Company leases office space pursuant to operating leases that are subject to specific escalation clauses. Rent expense charged to operations for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019~~2020 amounted to $~~6,454~~6,429, $~~6,382~~6,454, and $~~6,214~~6,382, respectively. The Company received sub-lease income from subtenants during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019~~2020 of $154, $154, and $~~106~~154, respectively. Therefore, for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019,~~2020, net rent expense amounted to $~~6,300~~6,275, $~~6,228~~6,300, and $~~6,108~~6,228, respectively, and is included in general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

F-27

As security for performance under the leases, the Company is required to maintain letters of credit in favor of the landlord totaling $506 as of December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020.~~2021. The letter of credit was collateralized by the Company’s revolving credit facility with City National Bank in ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020.~~2021. Furthermore, the Company maintains an $80 letter of credit in favor of its Boston landlord that is collateralized by the Company’s revolving credit facility with City National Bank.

In March 2014, the Company entered into a lease agreement for additional office space in Richmond, VA. The lease commenced on May 1, 2014 and had an original expiration date of July 31, 2019. The lease is subject to escalation clauses and provides for a rent-free period of three months. Monthly rent expense is $5. The Company paid a refundable security deposit of $3. In September 2016, the Company entered into Lease Amendment Number One (“Amendment Number One”) to expand its space and extend its lease. This expansion was to occur on or about October 1, 2017, and the lease was extended to November 30, 2024. This was further amended on January 16, 2018 (“Amendment Number Two”) to update the expansion date to January 12, 2018 and to extend the term of the lease to November 30, 2028. The amended lease provides for a rent credit of $40. Monthly rent expense under the amended lease is $10.

In June 2015, the Company entered into a lease agreement for office space in Charlottesville, VA. The lease commenced on June 30, 2015 and expired, as amended, on June 30, 2019. On June 6, 2019, the Company extended this lease for three years, with the new term beginning on July 1, 2019 and expiring on June 30, 2022. Monthly rent expense is $2. The Company paid a refundable security deposit of $2.

In connection with the Jamison Acquisition, the Company assumed lease agreements for office space in Bedminster and Princeton, NJ. The Bedminster lease, as extended, expires on March 31, 2022. Monthly rent expense on the Bedminster lease is $11. The Bedminster lease is subject to escalation clauses and provides for a rent-fee period of four months. The Princeton lease, as extended, expired on April 30, 2016. In October 2021, the Company extended its Bedminster lease. The amended lease commences on April 1, 2022 and expires on July 31, 2027. Monthly rent expense under this extension is $11. The amended lease is subject to escalation clauses and provides for a rent-free period of four months.

In December 2015, the Company extended its lease related to its New York City office space. The amended lease commenced on October 1, 2017 and expires on September 30, 2028. The lease is subject to escalation clauses, and provides for a rent-free period of twelve months and for tenant improvements of up to $2,080. Monthly rent expense under this extension is $446.

In January 2016, the Company entered into a lease agreement for office space in Princeton, NJ. The lease commenced April 23, 2016 and ~~expires~~expired on August 31, 2022. This lease ~~replaces~~replaced the Princeton lease discussed above that expired on April 30, 2016. Monthly rent expense on this lease iswas $6. The lease iswas subject to escalation clauses, and ~~provides~~provided for a rent-free period of five months.

With the Cappiccille Acquisition, the Company assumed a lease agreement for office space in Livingston, NJ. The lease was month-to-month. Monthly rent expense was $2. This lease was terminated in January 2019.

~~F-27~~

In January 2018, the Company extended its lease related to its Boston, MA office space. The amended lease commenced on January 1, 2018 and expires on April 30, 2023. The lease provides for a rent-free period of one month. Monthly rent expense under this extension is $33.

With the Neosho Acquisition, the Company assumed a lease agreement for office space in La Jolla, CA. The lease expired on January 31, 2020. Monthly rent expense was $3. On November 5, 2019, the Company entered into a lease agreement for office space in San Diego, CA. The lease commenced on February 1, 2020 and expires on June 30, 2025. The lease is subject to escalation clauses and provides for a rent-free period of four months and for tenant improvements of up to $27. Monthly rent expense under this lease is $12.

With the Cortina Acquisition, the Company assumed a lease agreement for office space in Milwaukee, WI. The lease was extended on June 17, 2020 and ~~expires~~expired on December 31, 2022. Monthly rent expense was $12. On December 5, 2022 this lease was amended to extend the termination date to June 30, 2023. Monthly rent is $12.

On November 14, 2022, the Company entered into a lease agreement for office space in Milwaukee, WI. The lease commences once the landlord has completed work on the space and expires 132 months after the commencement date. The lease agreement provides for a rent-free period of 24 months. Monthly rent expense under this lease will be $20.

The components of lease expense for the years ended December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020~~2021 is as follows:

Year ended December 31,

Year Ended December 31,

2021

2020

Operating Lease Cost

$
6,133

$
6,123

Financing Lease Cost:

     Amortization of ROU assets

119

118

     Interest on lease liabilities

11

10

     Total

130

128

F-28


	Year ended December 31,		Year Ended December 31,
	2022		2021
Operating Lease Cost	$	6,108	$	6,133
Financing Lease Cost:
Amortization of ROU assets		116		119
Interest on lease liabilities		9		11
Total		125		130

Future minimum lease payments and rentals under lease agreements for office space which expire through 2028 are as follows:


	Minimum Lease Commitments		Non-cancellable Subleases			Minimum Net Rentals			Minimum Lease Commitments		Non-cancellable Subleases			Minimum Net Rentals
2022	$	6,434	$	(155	)	$	6,279
2023		6,068		(6	)		6,062		$	6,171	$	(36	)	$	6,135
2024		6,150		—			6,150			6,150		—			6,150
2025		6,078		—			6,078			6,209		—			6,209
2026		5,999		—			5,999			6,266		—			6,266
2027										6,219		—			6,219
Thereafter		10,368		—			10,368			6,423		—			6,423
		41,097		(161	)		40,936			37,438		(36	)		37,402
Weighted-average remaining lease term – operating leases (months)							77.2								71.7
Weighted-average discount rate							4.2	%							4.4	%

The Company has finance leases for the following office equipment: (i) a ~~three-year~~three year lease agreement for one copier totaling $11 with monthly minimum payments of $0.3, which began on March 1, 2018 and continued through January 31, 2021, (ii) a ~~three-year~~three year lease agreement for one copier totaling $13 with monthly minimum payments of $0.4, which began on March 1, 2019 and ~~continue~~continued through February 28, 2022, (iii) a 39-month lease agreement for one copier totaling $12 with monthly minimum lease payments of $0.4, which began on March 1, 2019 and ~~continue~~continued through May 31, 2022, (iv) a lease agreement for one copier that was assumed as part of the Cortina Acquisition with monthly minimum lease payments of $1, which began on July 1, 2019 and ~~continue~~continued through November 30, 2021, (v) a three year lease agreement for two copiers totaling $51 with monthly minimum lease payments of $1, which began on August 1, 2019 and ~~continue~~continued through July 31, 2022, (vi) a five year lease agreement for a copier totaling $82 with monthly minimum lease payments of $1, which began on May 1, 2020 and ~~continue through~~ ~~April 30, 2025~~,was disposed in September 2022, (vii) a three year lease agreement for a copier totaling $59 with minimum monthly lease payments of $2, which began on June 1, 2020 and ~~continue through~~ ~~May 31, 2023~~,was disposed in September 2022, (viii) a three year lease agreement for two copiers totaling $43 with minimum monthly lease payments of $1, which began on August 20, 2020 and ~~continue~~continues through August 19, 2023, (ix) a three year lease agreement for two copiers totaling $39 with minimum monthly lease payments of $1, which began on August 20, 2020 and ~~continue~~continues through August 19, 2023, (x) a five year lease agreement for four copiers totaling $94 with minimum monthly lease payments of $2, which began on February 1, 2021 and ~~continue~~continues through January 31, 2026 ~~and~~, (xi) a three year lease agreement for two copiers totaling $52 with minimum monthly lease payments of $1, which begin on July 1, 2021 and ~~continue~~continues through June 30, 2024, (xii) a four year lease for a copier totaling $31 with minimum monthly payments of $1, which began on May 1, 2022 and continues through ~~June~~April 30, ~~2024~~2026, (xiii) a three year lease for a copier totaling $30 with minimum monthly lease payments of $1, which began on September 1, 2022 and continues through August 31, 2025, (xiv) a 39-month lease for a copier totaling $11 with minimum monthly lease payments of $0.3, which began on September 1, 2022 and continues through November 30, 2025, and (xv) a five year lease for office equipment totaling $210 with minimum monthly payments of $4, which begins on October 1, 2022 and continues through September 30, 2027. The aggregate principal balance of finance leases was $~~253~~344 and $~~259~~253 as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, ~~and 2020,~~ respectively.

Depreciation expense relating to finance lease assets was $~~119~~116, $~~118~~119 and $~~106~~118 for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019,~~2020, respectively.

11. EQUITY

SLP historically made, and will continue to make, distributions of its net income to the holders of its partnership units for income tax purposes as required under the terms of its Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement and also made, and will continue to make, additional distributions of net income under the terms of its Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement. Partnership distributions totaled $~~6,680~~7,912, $~~6,297~~6,680 and $~~7,698~~6,297 for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019,~~2020, respectively. Distributions are included in non-controlling interests in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

Pursuant to SLP’s Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement, as amended and restated, partner incentive allocations are treated as distributions of net income. The remaining net income or loss after partner incentive allocations was generally allocated to the partners based on their pro rata ownership. Net income allocation is subject to the recovery of the allocated losses of prior periods. Distributions of partner incentive allocations of net income for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019~~2020 amounted to $~~27,819~~34,429, $~~27,328~~27,819 and $~~27,199~~27,328, respectively. The distributions are included in non-controlling interests in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition and Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019.~~2020. The Company treats SLP’s partner incentive allocations as compensation expense and accrues such amounts when earned. During the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019,~~2020, SLP accrued partner incentive allocations of $~~34,781~~32,262, $~~27,467~~34,781 and $~~27,229~~27,467, respectively.

~~F-29~~

Silvercrest—Equity

Silvercrest has the following authorized and outstanding equity:

Shares at December 31, 2021

Shares at December 31, 2022

Authorized

Outstanding

Voting Rights

Economic
Rights

Authorized

Outstanding

Voting Rights

Economic
Rights

Common shares

Class A, par value $0.01 per share

50,000,000

9,869,101

1 vote per share (1), (2)

All (1), (2)

50,000,000

9,559,587

1 vote per share (1), (2)

All (1), (2)

Class B, par value $0.01 per share

25,000,000

4,593,687

1 vote per share (3), (4)

None (3), (4)

25,000,000

4,545,380

1 vote per share (3), (4)

None (3), (4)

Preferred shares

Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share

10,000,000

See footnote (5)
below

10,000,000

—

See footnote (5)
below

(1)

Each share of Class A common stock is entitled to one vote per share. Class A common stockholders have 100% of the rights of all classes of Silvercrest’s capital stock to receive dividends.

(2)

During ~~2021and 2020,~~2022 and 2021, Silvercrest granted ~~14,318~~10,270 and ~~8,242~~14,318 restricted stock units, respectively, which will vest and settle in the form of Class A shares of Silvercrest, of which ~~21,704~~31,974 remain unvested as of December 31, ~~2021.~~2022.

(3)

Each share of Class B common stock is entitled to one vote per share.

F-30

(4)

Each Class B unit of SLP held by a principal is exchangeable for one share of the Company’s Class A common stock. The principals collectively hold ~~4,593,687~~4,545,380 Class B units, which represents the right to receive their proportionate share of the distributions made by SLP and ~~170,854~~212,927 restricted stock units which will vest and settle in the form of Class B units of SLP. The ~~170,854~~212,927 restricted stock units which have been issued to our principals entitle the holders thereof to participate in distributions from SLP as if the underlying Class B units are outstanding and thus are taken into account to determine the economic interest of each holder of units in SLP. However, because the Class B units underlying the deferred equity units have not been issued and are not deemed outstanding, the holders of deferred equity units have no voting rights with respect to those Class B units. Silvercrest will not issue shares of Class B common stock in respect of deferred equity units of SLP until such time that the underlying Class B units are issued.

(5)

Silvercrest’s board of directors has the authority to issue preferred stock in one or more classes or series and to fix the rights, preferences, privileges and related restrictions, including dividend rights, dividend rates, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption, redemption prices, liquidation preferences and the number of shares constituting any class or series, or the designation of the class or series, without the approval of its stockholders.

Silvercrest is dependent on cash generated by SLP to fund any dividends. Generally, SLP will distribute its profits to all of its partners, including Silvercrest, based on the proportionate ownership each holds in SLP. Silvercrest will fund dividends to its stockholders from its proportionate share of those distributions after provision for income taxes and other obligations.

During the year ended December 31, ~~2021,~~2022, Silvercrest issued the following shares:

Class A Common Stock


	Transaction		# of
	Date			Shares
Class A common stock outstanding - January 1, ~~2021~~2022			~~9,650,692~~9,869,101
Issuance of Class A common stock upon conversion of Class B units to Class A common stock	March ~~2021~~2022		~~7,605~~
~~Issuance of Class A common stock upon vesting of restricted stock units~~	~~May 2021~~		~~856~~2,889
Issuance of Class A common stock upon conversion of Class B units to Class A common stock	May ~~2021~~2022		~~4,743~~31,922
Issuance of Class A common stock upon conversion of Class B units to Class A common stock	June ~~2021~~2022		~~5,864~~
~~Issuance of Class A common stock upon conversion of Class B units to Class A common stock~~	~~August 2021~~		~~10,651~~7,549
Purchase of Class A common stock of Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.	~~September 2021~~August 2022		(~~27,197~~148,579	)
Issuance of Class A common stock upon conversion of Class B units to Class A common stock	~~November 2021~~August 2022	770	~~51,115~~
Purchase of Class A common stock of Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.	September 2022	(136,930	)
Issuance of Class A common stock upon conversion of Class B units to Class A common stock	September 2022	740
Purchase of Class A common stock Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.	November ~~2021~~2022		(~~1,192~~57,000	)
Issuance of Class A common stock upon conversion of Class B units to Class A common stock	~~December 2021~~November 2022		~~170,658~~13,933
Purchase of Class A common stock Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.	December ~~2021~~2022		(~~4,694~~133,190	)
Issuance of Class A common stock upon conversion of Class B units to Class A common stock	December 2022	108,382
Class A common shares outstanding - December 31, ~~2021~~2022			~~9,869,101~~9,559,587

~~F-30~~F-31

Class B Common Stock


	Transaction		# of
	Date			Shares
Class B common stock outstanding - January 1, ~~2021~~2022		4,593,687	~~4,721,646~~
Cancellation of Class B common stock upon conversion of Class B units to Class A common stock	March 2022	(2,889	)
Issuance of Class B common stock in connection with the Neosho Acquisition	April 2022	1,224
Issuance of Class B common stock upon vesting of restricted stock units	~~January 2021~~May 2022		~~21,598~~
~~Issuance of Class B common stock~~	~~January 2021~~		~~34,196~~50,081
Cancellation of Class B common stock upon conversion of Class B units to Class A common stock	~~March 2021~~May 2022		(~~7,605~~31,922	)
Cancellation of Class B common stock upon conversion of Class B units to Class A common stock	~~May 2021~~June 2022		(~~4,743~~7,549	)
Issuance of Class B common stock ~~upon vesting of restricted stock units~~in connection with the Cortina Acquisition	~~May 2021~~July 2022		~~20,876~~66,573
Cancellation of Class B common stock upon conversion of Class B units to Class A common stock	~~June 2021~~August 2022		(~~5,864~~	)
~~Issuance of Class B common stock in connection with the Neosho Acquisition~~	~~June 2021~~		~~1,740~~
~~Issuance of Class B common stock in connection with the Cortina Acquisition~~	~~July 2021~~		~~44,267~~
~~Cancellation of Class B common stock upon conversion of Class B units to Class A common stock~~	~~August 2021~~		(~~10,651~~770	)
Cancellation of Class B common stock upon conversion of Class B units to Class A common stock	~~November 2021~~September 2022		(~~51,115~~740	)
Cancellation of Class B common stock upon conversion of Class B units to Class A common stock	~~December 2021~~November 2022		(~~170,658~~13,933	)
Cancellation of Class B common stock upon conversion of Class B units to Class A common stock	December 2022	(108,382	)
Class B common shares outstanding - December 31, ~~2021~~2022			~~4,593,687~~4,545,380

In ~~January 2021, the Company issued~~ ~~21,598~~ ~~shares of Class B common stock upon the vesting of restricted stock units.~~

~~In January 2021, the Company issued~~ ~~34,196~~ ~~shares of Class B common stock to certain principals in connection with their admission to SLP.~~

In March ~~2021,~~2022, the Company redeemed ~~7,605~~2,889 shares of Class B common stock from certain existing partners, in connection with the exchange of ~~a like number of~~2,889 Class B units to Class A common stock pursuant to the Resale and Registration Rights Agreement.

In ~~May 2021,~~April 2022, in connection with the Neosho Acquisition, the Company ~~redeemed from certain existing partners~~issued ~~4,743~~1,224 shares of Class B common ~~stock in connection with the exchange of a like number of Class B units to Class A common stock pursuant to the Resale and Registration Rights Agreement.~~stock.

In May ~~2021,~~2022, the Company issued ~~856~~ ~~shares of Class A common stock and~~ ~~20,876~~50,081 shares of Class B common stock upon the vesting of restricted stock units.

In ~~June 2021,~~May 2022, the Company redeemed ~~from certain existing partners~~ ~~5,864~~31,922 shares of Class B common stock from certain existing partners, in connection with the exchange of ~~a like number of~~31,922 Class B units to Class A common stock pursuant to the Resale and Registration Rights Agreement.

In June ~~2021, in connection with the Neosho Acquisition,~~2022, the Company ~~issued~~redeemed ~~1,740~~7,549 shares of Class B common ~~stock.~~stock from certain existing partners, in connection with the exchange of 7,549 Class B units to Class A common stock pursuant to the Resale and Registration Rights Agreement.

In July ~~2021,~~2022, in connection with the Cortina Acquisition, the Company issued ~~44,267~~66,573 shares of Class B common stock.

In August ~~2021,~~2022, the Company redeemed ~~from certain existing partners~~ ~~10,651~~770 shares of Class B common stock from certain existing partners, in connection with the exchange of ~~a like number~~770 Class B units to Class A common stock pursuant to the Resale and Registration Rights Agreement.

In September 2022, the Company redeemed 740 shares of Class B common stock from certain existing partners, in connection with the exchange of 740 Class B units to Class A common stock pursuant to the Resale and Registration Rights Agreement.

In November ~~2021,~~2022, the Company redeemed ~~from certain existing partners~~ ~~51,115~~13,933 shares of Class B common stock from certain existing partners, in connection with the exchange of ~~a like number of~~13,933 Class B units to Class A common stock pursuant to the Resale and Registration Rights Agreement.

In December ~~2021,~~2022, the Company redeemed ~~from certain existing partners~~ ~~170,658~~108,382 shares of Class B common stock from certain existing partners, in connection with the exchange of ~~a like number of~~108,382 Class B units to Class A common stock pursuant to the Resale and Registration Rights ~~Agreement.~~Agreement

On July 29, 2021, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had approved a share repurchase program authorizing the Company to repurchase up to $15,000 of the Company’s outstanding Class A common stock (the “Repurchase Program”). Repurchases under the Repurchase Program may be made using either cash on hand, borrowings under the Company’s existing credit facilities or other sources, or (a) one or more 10b5-1 share trading plans, to be established with one or more banks or brokers (the

~~F-31~~

~~“Trading~~ “Trading Plans”), (b) pursuant to accelerated share repurchase programs with one or more investment banks or other financial intermediaries (the “ASR Programs”), or (c) through repurchases to be made outside of the Trading Plans or ASR Programs but in

F-32

compliance with all applicable requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), including the safe harbor provided by Exchange Act Rule 10b-18, and consummated during an open trading window under the Company’s insider trading policy. The program may be amended, suspended, or discontinued at any time and does not commit the Company to repurchase any shares of Common Stock.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company had purchased 508,782 and 33,083 shares, respectively, of Class A common stock for an aggregate price of approximately $9,295 and $512., respectively.

The total number of shares of Class B common stock outstanding and held by employee-principals equals the number of Class B units those individuals hold in SLP. Shares of Silvercrest’s Class B common stock are issuable only in connection with the issuance of Class B units of SLP. When a vested or unvested Class B unit is issued by SLP, Silvercrest will issue to the holder one share of its Class B common stock in exchange for the payment of its par value, subject to the holder’s agreement to be bound by the terms of a stockholders’ agreement amongst the Class B stockholders of the Company. Each share of Silvercrest’s Class B common stock will be redeemed for its par value and cancelled by Silvercrest if the holder of the corresponding Class B unit exchanges or forfeits its Class B unit pursuant to the terms of the Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of SLP, the terms of the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan of Silvercrest, or otherwise.

14. INCOME TAXES

Income before tax expense for 2022 was $38,399. Of this amount $38,789 is from domestic sources and ($390) is from foreign sources. Prior to 2022 there were no amounts that were from foreign sources and all amounts in years prior to 2022 were from domestic sources.


	Year Ended December 31,						Year Ended December 31,
	2021		2020		2019		2022		2021		2020
Current Provision:
Federal	$	3,417	$	1,309	$	1,225	$	1,997	$	3,417	$	1,309
State and local		2,605		1,856		2,378		1,642		2,605		1,856
Foreign								—		—		—
Total Current Provision		6,022		3,165		3,603		3,639		6,022		3,165
Deferred Provision:
Federal		611		1,513		1,014		2,653		611		1,513
State and local		290		716		561		1,314		290		716
Foreign								—		—		—
Total Deferred Provision		901		2,229		1,575		3,967		901		2,229
Total Provision for Income Taxes	$	6,923	$	5,394	$	5,178	$	7,606	$	6,923	$	5,394

Deferred taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and their bases for income tax purposes.

F-34

As of December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, the Company had a net deferred tax asset of $~~10,702~~6,634 and $~~11,305~~10,702, respectively.

~~F-33~~

A summary of deferred tax assets and liabilities as follows:


	As of December 31,				As of December 31,
	2021		2020		2022			2021
Deferred tax assets
Intangible assets	$	12,660	$	13,032	$	10,933		$	12,660
Deferred leases		443		809		440			443
Net operating losses, foreign subsidiary						68			—
Total deferred tax assets	$	13,103	$	13,841	$	11,441		$	13,103
Deferred tax liabilities
Intangible assets	$	142	$	201	$	317		$	142
Right of use assets		357		674		352			357
Investment on underlying SLP partnership		1,863		1,634		4,018			1,863
Other		39		27		52			39
Total deferred tax liabilities	$	2,401	$	2,536		4,739			2,401
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)	$	10,702	$	11,305		6,702			10,702
Less: Valuation allowance						(68	)		—
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)					$	6,634		$	10,702

The following table reconciles the provision for income taxes to the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate:


	Year Ended December 31,									Year Ended December 31,
	2021			2020			2019			2022			2021			2020
Statutory U.S. federal income tax rate		21.00	%		21.00	%		21.00	%		21.00	%		21.00	%		21.00	%
Income passed through to Partners		(7.05	)%		(7.10	)%		(7.78	)%		(6.84	)%		(7.05	)%		(7.10	)%
State and local income taxes		7.56	%		9.32	%		12.01	%		6.30	%		7.56	%		9.32	%
Permanent items		(0.03	)%		(0.13	)%		(0.44	)%		(0.77	)%		(0.03	)%		(0.13	)%
Foreign rate differential											(0.18	)%		—			—
Other		0.24	%		0.49	%		0.36	%		0.12	%		0.24	%		0.49	%
Change in valuation allowance											0.18	%		—			—
Effective income tax rate		21.72	%		23.58	%		25.15	%		19.81	%		21.72	%		23.58	%

AsDuring 2022, the Company has recorded a deferred tax asset associated with net operating losses of its foreign subsidiary. Realization of the deferred tax asset is contingent on the foreign subsidiary generating future taxable income. Given the foreign subsidiary has recently initiated operations and does not yet have a history of sales, the Company has concluded that the deferred tax asset does not currently meet the more-likely-than-not threshold for realizability. Accordingly, a full valuation allowance has been recorded with respect to the net operating losses of the Company’s foreign subsidiary in the amount of $68 at December 31, ~~2021, the Company had net tax receivables of $~~2022. There were ~~641~~no ~~which consisted of net federal and state and local tax receivables of ($~~45~~) and $686, respectively. As of~~valuation allowances at December 31, ~~2020, the Company had net tax receivables of $1,653~~ ~~which consisted of net federal and state and local tax receivables of $949~~ ~~and $704, respectively.~~2021.

Of the total net deferred taxes at December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, $3193 and $3031, respectively, of the net deferred tax liabilities relate to non-controlling interests. These amounts are included in deferred tax and other liabilities on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, respectively.

In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to examination by federal, state, and local tax regulators. As of December 31, ~~2021,~~2022, the Company’s U.S. federal income tax returns for the years ~~2018~~2019 through ~~2021~~2022 are open under the normal three-year statute of limitations and therefore subject to examination.

The impact from the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 is incorporated in the 2022 financials. There was no material impact to the Company.

The guidance for accounting for uncertainty in income taxes prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company does not believe that it has any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax

F-35

benefits will significantly increase or decrease within the next twelve months. Furthermore, the Company does not have any material uncertain tax positions at December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020.~~2021.

16. EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION

Restricted Stock Units and Stock Options

On November 2, 2012, the Company’s board of directors adopted the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan.

A total of 1,687,500 shares were originally reserved and available for issuance under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. On June 8, 2022, the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan was amended to increase the number of shares issuable under the plan by 1,050,000, to a total of 2,737,500. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, ~~and 2020,~~ ~~192,689~~1,140,265 and ~~345,428~~192,689 shares, respectively, were available for grant. The equity interests may be issued in the form of shares of the Company’s Class A common stock and/or Class B units of SLP. (All references to units or interests of SLP refer to Class B units of SLP and accompanying shares of Class B common stock of Silvercrest.)

The purposes of the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan are to (i) align the long-term financial interests of our employees, directors, consultants and advisers with those of our stockholders; (ii) attract and retain those individuals by providing compensation opportunities that are consistent with our compensation philosophy; and (iii) provide incentives to those individuals who contribute significantly to our long-term performance and growth. To accomplish these purposes, the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan provides for the grant of units of SLP. The 2012 Equity Incentive Plan also provides for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, or SARs, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, performance-based stock awards and other stock-based awards (collectively, stock awards) based on our Class A common stock. Awards may be granted to employees, including officers, members, limited partners or partners who are engaged in the business of one or more of our subsidiaries, as well as non-employee directors and consultants.

The Compensation Committee may impose vesting conditions and awards may be forfeited if the vesting conditions are not met. During the period that any vesting restrictions apply, unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee, the recipient of awards that vest in the form of units of SLP will be eligible to participate in distributions of income from SLP. In addition, before the vesting conditions have been satisfied, the transferability of such units is generally prohibited and such units will not be eligible to be exchanged for cash or shares of our Class A common stock.

In May 2016, the Company granted 3,791 RSUs under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan at a fair value of $13.19 per share to existing Class B unit holders. These RSUs will vest and settle in the form of Class B units of SLP. ~~NaN~~Twenty-five percent of the RSUs granted vest and settle on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.

In May 2016, the Company granted 3,000 RSUs under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan at a fair value of $13.19 per share to certain members of the Board of Directors. These RSUs will vest and settle in the form of Class A shares of Silvercrest. ~~NaN~~One hundred percent of the RSUs granted vest and settle on the first anniversary of the grant date.

In May 2016, the Company granted 7,582 RSUs under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan at a fair value of $13.19 per share to an employee. These RSUs will vest and settle in the form of Class A shares of Silvercrest. ~~NaN~~Twenty-five percent of the RSUs granted vest and settle on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.

In October 2018, the Company granted 105,398 non-qualified stock options (“NQOs”) under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan to an existing Class B unit holder. The fair value of the NQOs have been derived using the Black-Scholes method with the following assumptions: Strike price of $13.97, Risk Free rate of 2.94% (5-year treasury rate), expiration of 5 years and volatility of 32.7%. Additionally, the calculation of the compensation expense assumes a forfeiture rate of 1.0%, based on historical experience. These NQOs will vest and settle in the form of Class B units of SLP. One third of the NQOs will vest and settle on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date.

In May 2019, the Company granted 60,742 non-qualified stock options (“NQOs”) under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan to an existing Class B unit holder. The fair value of the NQOs has been derived using the Black-Scholes method with the following assumptions: Strike price of $14.54, Risk Free rate of 2.32% (5-year treasury rate), expiration of 5 years and volatility of 34.2%. Additionally, the calculation of the compensation expense assumes a forfeiture rate of 1.0%, based on historical experience. These NQOs will vest and become exercisable into of Class B units of SLP. One third of the NQOs will vest and become exercisable on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date.

In May 2019, the Company granted 34,388 RSUs under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan at a fair value of $14.54 per share to an existing Class B unit holder. These RSUs will vest and settle in the form of Class B shares of SLP. ~~NaN~~Twenty-five percent of the RSUs granted vest and settle on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.

In March 2020, the Company granted 8,242 RSUs under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan at a fair value of $11.83 per share to a Board member. These RSUs will vest and settle in the form of Class A shares of Silvercrest. All of the RSUs granted vest on the third anniversary of the grant date.

In May 2020, the Company granted 86,764 NQOs under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan to an existing Class B unit holder. The fair value of the NQOs has been derived using the Black-Scholes method with the following assumptions: Strike price of $10.18, Risk

Free rate of 0.64% (10-year treasury rate), expiration of 10 years and volatility of 48.0%. Additionally, the calculation of the compensation expense assumes a forfeiture rate of 1.0%, based on historical experience. These NQOs will vest and become exercisable into of Class B units of SLP. One-third of the NQOs will vest and become exercisable on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date.

In May 2020, the Company granted 49,116 RSUs under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan at a fair value of $10.11 per share to an existing Class B unit holder. These RSUs will vest and settle in the form of Class B shares of SLP. ~~NaN~~Twenty-five percent of the RSUs granted vest and settle on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.

In January 2021, the Company granted 21,598 RSUs under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan at a fair value of $13.89 per share to existing Class B unit holders. These RSUs vested and settled immediately in the form of Class B shares of SLP.

In May 2021, the Company granted 116,823 RSUs under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan at a fair value of $13.91 per share to existing Class B unit holders. These RSUs will vest and settle in the form of Class B shares of SLP. ~~NaN~~Twenty-five percent of the RSUs granted vest and settle on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.

In May 2021, the Company granted 856 RSUs under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan at a fair value of $14.61 per share to an existing Class A unit holder. These RSUs vested and settled immediately in the form of Class A shares of SLP.

In May 2021, the Company granted 11,635 RSUs under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan at a fair value of $14.61 per share to existing Class A unit holders. These RSUs will vest and settle in the form of Class A shares of SLP. One third of the RSUs granted vest and settle on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date.

In August 2021, the Company granted 1,827 RSUs under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan at a fair value of $15.96 per share to an existing Class A unit holder. These RSUs will vest and settle in the form of Class A shares of SLP. The RSUs vest and settle on the third anniversary of the grant date.

In May 2022, the Company granted 10,270 RSUs under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan at a fair value of $21.42 per share to existing Class A unit holders. These RSUs will vest and settle in the form of Class A shares of SLP. The RSUs vest and settle on the third anniversary of the grant date.

In November 2022, the Company granted 92,154 RSUs under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan at a fair value of $18.99 per share to existing Class B unit holders. These RSUs will vest and settle in the form of Class B shares of SLP. Twenty-five percent of the RSUs granted vest and settle on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.

A summary of the NQO grants by the Company as of December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020~~2021 is presented below:

Non-Qualified Options
Granted

Units

Fair Value per unit

Total granted at January 1, 2020

166,140

$
13.97 – 14.54

Granted in May 2020

86,764

10.18

Total granted at December 31, 2020

252,904

$
10.18 – 14.54

Total granted at December 31, 2021

252,904

$
10.18 – 14.54

For the years ended December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, the Company recorded compensation expense related to such RSUs and NQOs of $~~1,426~~1,149 and $~~659~~1,426, respectively, as part of total compensation expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years then ended. As of December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, there was $~~2,047~~2,860 and $~~1,342~~2,047, respectively, of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested awards. As of December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, the unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested awards is expected to be recognized over a period of~~1.22~~ 0.92 and ~~1.44~~1.22 years, respectively.

19. SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

The following is a summary of the quarterly results of operations of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.


	2021								2022
	First Quarter		Second Quarter		Third Quarter		Fourth Quarter		First Quarter		Second Quarter		Third Quarter		Fourth Quarter
Revenue	$	31,237	$	33,101	$	33,461	$	33,804	$	33,510	$	32,173	$	29,042	$	28,492
Income before other income (expense), net	$	5,688	$	7,342	$	8,181	$	9,310	$	15,439	$	11,900	$	7,102	$	4,121
Net income	$	4,335	$	5,661	$	6,354	$	8,596	$	12,396	$	9,473	$	5,643	$	3,281
Net income attributable to Silvercrest	$	2,552	$	3,335	$	3,723	$	5,083	$	7,568	$	5,770	$	3,433	$	2,057
Net income per share/unit - basic	$	0.26	$	0.35	$	0.38	$	0.53	$	0.77	$	0.58	$	0.35	$	0.22
Net income per share/unit - diluted	$	0.26	$	0.35	$	0.38	$	0.53	$	0.77	$	0.58	$	0.35	$	0.22
Weighted average shares/units outstanding - basic		9,651,765		9,662,809		9,670,054		9,709,169		9,869,444		9,887,018		9,815,157		9,603,073
Weighted average shares/units outstanding - diluted		9,660,007		9,678,466		9,691,103		9,730,873		9,891,148		9,913,437		9,847,131		9,635,047


	2020								2021
	First Quarter		Second Quarter		Third Quarter		Fourth Quarter		First Quarter		Second Quarter		Third Quarter		Fourth Quarter
Revenue	$	28,365	$	24,021	$	27,182	$	28,415	$	31,237	$	33,101	$	33,461	$	33,804
Income before other income (expense), net	$	12,614	$	1,357	$	4,949	$	3,361	$	5,688	$	7,342	$	8,181	$	9,310
Net income	$	9,690	$	782	$	3,480	$	3,526	$	4,335	$	5,661	$	6,354	$	8,596
Net income attributable to Silvercrest	$	5,532	$	490	$	2,059	$	1,879	$	2,552	$	3,335	$	3,723	$	5,083
Net income per share/unit - basic	$	0.59	$	0.05	$	0.21	$	0.20	$	0.26	$	0.35	$	0.38	$	0.53
Net income per share/unit – diluted	$	0.59	$	0.05	$	0.21	$	0.20	$	0.26	$	0.35	$	0.38	$	0.53
Weighted average shares/units outstanding - basic		9,391,367		9,511,767		9,532,362		9,576,169		9,651,765		9,662,809		9,670,054		9,709,169
Weighted average shares/units outstanding - diluted		9,396,072		9,520,655		9,540,604		9,584,411		9,660,007		9,678,466		9,691,103		9,730,873


Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Class A common stock, $0.01 par value per share	SAMG	The Nasdaq Global Market


Part I
Item 1.	Description of Business	4
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	19
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	36
Item 2.	Properties	36
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	36
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	36
Part II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	37
Item 6.	[Reserved]	3837
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	3938
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	5958
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	5958
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	58
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	6059
Item 9B.	Other Information	59
Item 9C.	Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections.	59
Part III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	6160
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	6160
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	6160
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	6160
Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	6160
Part IV
Item 15.	~~Exhibits,~~Exhibit and Financial Statement Schedules	6261
Item 16	Form 10-K Summary	6463


Exhibit Number		Description
3.1*		Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed April 19, 2013).

3.2*		Bylaws of Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed April 19, 2013).

4.1*		Specimen Stock Certificate for Shares of Class A Common Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed April 19, 2013).

4.2*		Exchange Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed April 19, 2013).

4.3*		Resale and Registration Rights Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed May 22, 2013).

4.4*+		2012 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed April 19, 2013).

4.5*		Description of Capital Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K filed on March 5, 2019).

4.6*		Eighth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of June 19, 2020, among Silvercrest Asset Management Group LLC, Silvercrest Investors LLC, Silvercrest Investors II LLC and Silvercrest Financial Services, Inc., as borrowers, City National Bank, a national banking association, and acknowledged by Silvercrest L.P., as guarantor, initially filed as exhibit 4.1 on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 19, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on August 3, 2020).

4.7*		Tenth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of February 15, 2022, among Silvercrest Asset Management Group LLC, Silvercrest Investors LLC, Silvercrest Investors II LLC and Silvercrest Financial Services, Inc., as borrowers, City National Bank, a national banking association, and acknowledged by Silvercrest L.P., as guarantor (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's Form 10-Q filed on May 5, 2022).

4.8*		Eleventh Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of June 17, 2022, among Silvercrest Asset Management Group LLC, Silvercrest Investors LLC, Silvercrest Investors II LLC and Silvercrest Financial Services, Inc., as borrowers, City National Bank, a national banking association, and acknowledged by Silvercrest L.P., as guarantor (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's Form 8-K filed on June 17, 2022).

4.9*		Amendment to the Silvercrest Asset Management Group, Inc. 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on June 17, 2022).

10.1*		Form of Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Silvercrest L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed April 19, 2013).



10.2*		Tax Receivable Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed April 19, 2013).

10.3*+		Form of Indemnification Agreement with Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed April 19, 2013).

10.510.4		Credit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed June 25, 2013).


10.610.5		First Amendment to Credit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on December 23, 2016).

10.710.6+		Form of 2012 Equity Incentive Plan Class B Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on August 6, 2015).

10.810.7		First Amendment to Lease, dated December 23, 2015, by and between RXR 1330 Owner LLC and Silvercrest Asset Management Group LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K filed on March 10, 2016).

10.910.8		Third Amendment to Credit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on December 21, 2017).

10.1010.9		Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on August 1, 2018).

10.1110.10+		Employment agreement with Richard R. Hough III dated September 18, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed September 24, 2018).

10.1210.11		Form of Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed September 24, 2018).

10.1310.12		Sixth Amendment to Credit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed June 25, 2019).

10.1410.13		Seventh Amendment to Credit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed July 2, 2019)..

10.1510.14		Eighth Amendment to Credit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant’s Form 8-K filed June 19, 2020).

10.1610.15		Amendment to Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement among Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. and Brian D. Dunn, dated July 28, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on August 3, 2020).

10.1710.16+		Employment agreement with J. Allen Gray dated July 29, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on August 3, 2020).

10.1810.17		Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant’s Form 8-K filed June 17, 2021).

21.1**		List of Subsidiaries

23.1**		Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP

24.1**		Power of Attorney (included in the Form 10-K under "Signatures").

31.1**		Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2**		Certification of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1***		Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


☒	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


Auditor Firm Id:	34	Auditor Name:	Deloitte & Touche LLP	Auditor Location:	New York, New York


(B)	GAAP net income per share is strictly attributable to Class A shareholders. Adjusted earnings per share takes into account earnings attributable to both Class A and Class B shareholders.
(C)	Includes ~~21,704~~31,974 and ~~8,242~~21,704 unvested restricted stock units at December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, respectively.
(D)	Includes ~~170,854~~212,927 and ~~74,907~~170,854 unvested restricted stock units and 252,904 and ~~86,764~~252,904 non-qualified stock options at December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, respectively.


32.2***		Certification of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS**		Inline XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH**		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL**		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB**		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document



101.PRE**		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF**		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

104**		Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)


SILVERCREST ASSET MANAGEMENT GROUP INC.

By:		/s/ Richard R. Hough III
		Richard R. Hough III
		Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President

By:		/s/ Scott A. Gerard
		Scott A. Gerard
		Chief Financial Officer


Signature	Title	Date

/s/ Richard R. Hough III
Richard R. Hough III	(Principal Executive Officer), Chairman and Director	March 2, ~~2022~~2023

/s/ Scott A. Gerard
Scott A. Gerard	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)	March 2, ~~2022~~2023

/s/ Albert S. Messina
Albert S. Messina	Managing Director, Portfolio Manager and Director	March 2, ~~2022~~2023

/s/ Richard J. Burns
Richard J. Burns	Director	March 2, ~~2022~~2023

/s/ Brian D. Dunn
Brian D. Dunn	Director	March 2, ~~2022~~2023

/s/ Darla M. Romfo
Darla M. Romfo	Director	March 2, ~~2022~~2023


Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID Number 34)	F–	2

Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, ~~2021~~2022 and December 31, ~~2020~~2021	F–	5

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019~~2020	F–	6

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019~~2020	F–	7

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 ~~2020~~ and ~~2019~~2020	F–	89

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F–	1011


	Class A Common Stock Shares			Class A Common Stock Amount		Class B Common Stock Shares			Class B Common Stock Amount			Additional Paid-In Capital			Treasury Stock Shares	Treasury Stock Amount			Retained Earnings			Total Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.’s Equity			Non- controlling Interest			Total Equity
January 1, 2019		8,518		$	85		4,934		$	48		$	43,584		—	$	—		$	12,330		$	56,047		$	26,352		$	82,399
Distributions to partners		—			—		—			—			—		—		—			—			—			(7,698	)		(7,698	)
Issuance of Class B shares		—			—		665			7			—		—		—			—			7			8,965			8,972
Equity-based compensation		2			—		242			2			23		—		—			—			25			2,247			2,272
Repayment of notes receivable from partners		—			—		—			—			—		—		—			—			—			291			291
Net Income		—			—		—			—			—		—		—			8,646			8,646			6,766			15,412
Deferred tax, net of amounts payable under tax receivable agreement		—			—		—			—			1,500		—		—			—			1,500			—			1,500
Accrued interest on notes receivable from partners		—			—		—			—			—		—		—			—			—			(13	)		(13	)
Share Conversion		810			8		(810	)		(8	)		4,139		—		—			—			4,139			(4,139	)		—
Dividends paid on Class A common stock - $0.60 per share		—			—		—			—			—		—		—			(5,328	)		(5,328	)		—			(5,328	)
December 31, 2019		9,330		$	85		5,031		$	49		$	49,246		—	$	—		$	15,328		$	65,036		$	32,771		$	97,807
Distributions to partners		—			—		—			—			—		—		—			—			—			(6,297	)		(6,297	)
Equity-based compensation		3			—		9			—			106		—		—			—			106			585			691
Repayment of notes receivable from partners		—			—		—			—			—		—		—			—			—			300			300
Net Income		—			—		—			—			—		—		—			9,960			9,960			7,518			17,478
Deferred tax, net of amounts payable under tax receivable agreement		—			—		—			—			(462	)	—		—			—			(462	)		—			(462	)
Accrued interest on notes receivable from partners		—			—		—			—			—		—		—			—			—			(8	)		(8	)
Share Conversion		318			3		(318	)		(3	)		2,149		—		—			—			2,149			(2,149	)		—
Dividends paid on Class A common stock - $0.64 per share		—			—		—			—			—		—		—			(6,110	)		(6,110	)		—			(6,110	)
December 31, 2020		9,651		$	96		4,722		$	46		$	51,039		—	$	—		$	19,498		$	70,679		$	32,720		$	103,399
Distributions to partners		—			—		—			—			—		—		—			—			—			(6,680	)		(6,680	)
Issuance of Class B shares		—			—		102			1			—		—		—			—			1			1,173			1,174
Issuance of notes receivable from partners		—			—		—			—			—		—		—			—			—			(475	)		(475	)
Equity-based compensation		—			1		21			—			211		—		—			—			212			1,214			1,426
Repayment of notes receivable from partners		—			—		—			—			—		—		—			—			—			228			228
Net Income		—			—		—			—			—		—		—			14,693			14,693			10,253			24,946
Deferred tax, net of amounts payable under tax receivable agreement		—			—		—			—			(283	)	—		—			—			(283	)		—			(283	)
Accrued interest on notes receivable from partners		—			—		—			—			—		—		—			—			—			(6	)		(6	)
Share Conversion		251			2		(251	)		(2	)		1,969		—		—			—			1,969			(1,969	)		—
Purchase of shares of Class A common stock of Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.		(33	)		—		—			—			—		33		(512	)		—			(512	)		—			(512	)
Dividends paid on Class A common stock - $0.66 per share		—			—		—			—			—		—		—			(6,409	)		(6,409	)		—			(6,409	)
December 31, 2021		9,869		$	99		4,594		$	45		$	52,936		33	$	(512	)	$	27,782		$	80,350		$	36,458		$	116,808


Total fair value of tangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed	$	—	$	—
Goodwill		36,324		36,324
Customer relationships (15 years)		21,500		21,500
Total purchase consideration	$	57,824	$	57,824


	Pro Forma Year Ended December 31, 2019
Revenue	$	108,345
Net Income	$	15,990


	2021			2020
Management and advisory fees receivable	$	3,379		$	3,780
Unbilled receivables		5,917			5,107
Other receivables		2			2
Receivables		9,298			8,889
Allowance for doubtful receivables		(448	)		(548	)
Receivables, net	$	8,850		$	8,341


	2021			2020
Leasehold improvements	$	7,859		$	7,936
Furniture and equipment		8,258			7,275
Artwork		505			502
Total cost		16,622			15,713
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(11,365	)		(10,190	)
Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements, net	$	5,257		$	5,523


	December 31, 2021			December 31, 2020
Finance lease assets included in furniture and equipment	$	434		$	417
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(187	)		(163	)
	$	247		$	254


	Future Minimum Lease Commitments			Future Minimum Lease Commitments
2022		108
2023		76			109
2024		43			85
2025		24			75
2026		2			45
2027					31
Thereafter		—			—
Total	$	253		$	345
Weighted-average remaining lease term – finance leases (months)		33.1			44.7
Weighted-average discount rate		3.4	%		3.0	%


	Restricted Stock Units Granted
	Units			Fair Value per unit
Total granted at January 1, 2020		37,234		$	13.19 – 14.54
Granted in March 2020		8,242			11.83
Granted in May 2020		49,116			10.18
Vested in May 2020		(11,442	)		(13.19 – 14.54	)
Total granted at December 31, 2020		83,150		$	10.18 – 14.54
Granted in January 2021		21,598			13.89
Vested in January 2021		(21,598	)		(13.89	)
Granted in May 2021		129,314			13.91 – 14.61
Vested in May 2021		(21,732	)		(10.18 – 14.61	)
Granted in August 2021		1,827			15.96
Total granted at December 31, 2021		192,559		$	10.18 – 15.96

Non-Qualified Options
Granted

Fair Value per unit

Total granted at December 31, 2021

$10.18 – 14.54

Total granted at December 31, 2022

$10.18 – 14.54