UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
______________________
FORM 10-K
______________________
ýANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016.2019.
OR
oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
Commission file number: 0-27544

OPEN TEXT CORPORATIONCORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
______________________
Canada98-0154400
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
275 Frank Tompa Drive,N2L 0A1
Waterloo,OntarioCanada  
275 Frank Tompa Drive,
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
N2L 0A1
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (519) (519888-7111
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Trading Symbol(s)
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common stock without par valueOTEXNASDAQ Global Select Market
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yesý    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.   Yes  ¨Noý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yesý    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yesý    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to item 405 of Regulations S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitionthe definitions of “large accelerated filer”,filer,” “accelerated filer” andfiler,” “smaller reporting company”company,” and “emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filerý  Accelerated filer  ¨Non-accelerated filer  ¨ (Do not check if smaller reporting company)        Smaller reporting company ¨Emerging growth company 
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.      
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨   No  x
Aggregate market value of the Registrant's Common Shares held by non-affiliates, based on the closing price of the Common Shares as reported by the NASDAQ Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”) on December 31, 2015,2018, the end of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $5.7$8.6 billion. The numberAt July 30, 2019, there were 270,011,817 outstanding Common Shares of the Registrant's Common Shares outstanding as of July 25, 2016 was 121,443,442.registrant.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None.


OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Page No
Part I 
Item 1Business
Item 1ARisk Factors
Item 1BUnresolved Staff Comments
Item 2Properties
Item 3Legal Proceedings
Item 4Mine Safety Disclosures
  
Part II  
Item 5Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Item 6Selected Financial Data
Item 7Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationOperations
Item 7AQuantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Item 8Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9Changes in and Disagreements Withwith Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 9AControls and Procedures
   
Part III  
Item 10Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Item 11Executive Compensation
Item 12Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 13Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Item 14Principal Accounting Fees and Services
   
Part IV 
Item 15Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Item 16Form 10-K Summary
Signatures



PART
Part I
Forward-Looking Statements
In addition to historical information, this Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 21E of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 27A of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and is subject to the safe harboursharbors created by those sections. Words such as “anticipates”, “expects”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “seeks”, “estimates”, “may”, “could”, “would”, “might”, “will” and variations of these words or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements that refer to expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, performance or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking statements.statements, and are based on our current expectations, forecasts and projections about the operating environment, economies and markets in which we operate. Forward-looking statements reflect our current estimates, beliefs and assumptions, which are based on management’s perception of historic trends, current conditions and expected future developments, as well as other factors it believes are appropriate in the circumstances. These forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions including the following: (i) countries continuing to implement and enforce existing and additional customs and security regulations relating to the provision of electronic information for imports and exports; (ii) our continued operation of a secure and reliable business network; (iii) the stability of general political, economic and market conditions, currency exchange rates, and interest rates; (iv) equity and debt markets continuing to provide us with access to capital; (v) our continued ability to identify and source attractive and executable business combination opportunities, as well as our ability to continue to successfully integrate any such opportunities, including in accordance with the expected timeframe and/or cost budget for such integration; and (vi) our continued compliance with third party intellectual property rights. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks as well as uncertainties, including those discussed herein and in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended June 30, 2016,2019, which are set forth in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report. The actual results that we achieve may differ materially from any forward-looking statements, which reflect management's current expectations and projections about future results only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to revise or publicly release the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements. A number of factors may materially affect our business, financial condition, operating results and prospects. These factors include, but are not limited to, those set forth in Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report as well as other documents we file from time to time with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). Any one of these factors may cause our actual results to differ materially from recent results or from our anticipated future results. You should not rely too heavily on the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K because these forward-looking statements are relevant only as of the date they were made.
Throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K: (i) the term "Fiscal 2020" means our fiscal year beginning on July 1, 2019 and ending June 30, 2020; (ii) the term “Fiscal 2019” means our fiscal year beginning on July 1, 2018 and ended June 30, 2019; (iii) the term “Fiscal 2018” means our fiscal year beginning on July 1, 2017 and ended June 30, 2018; (iv) the term “Fiscal 2017” means our fiscal year beginning on July 1, 2016 and ended June 30, 2017; and (v) the term “Fiscal 2016” means our fiscal year beginning on July 1, 2015 and ended June 30, 2016. Our Consolidated Financial Statements are presented in U.S. dollars and, unless otherwise indicated, all amounts included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are expressed in U.S. dollars. References herein to the “Company”, “OpenText”, “we” or “us” refer to Open Text Corporation and, unless context requires otherwise, its subsidiaries.
Item 1.    Business
Open Text Corporation was incorporated on June 26, 1991. References herein to the “Company”, “OpenText”, “we” or “us” refer to Open Text Corporation and, unless context requires otherwise, its subsidiaries. Our principal office is located at 275 Frank Tompa Drive, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 0A1, and our telephone number at that location is (519) 888-7111. Our internet address is www.opentext.com. Our website is includedIncorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K as an inactive textual reference only. Except for the documents specifically incorporated by reference into this Annual Report, information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and should not be considered1991, OpenText has grown to be a partleader in providing Enterprise Information Management (EIM) solutions. We offer a comprehensive line of this Annual Report. Throughout this Annual Reportproducts and services that aim to enable businesses to grow faster, obtain lower operational costs and reduce information governance and security risks by improving business insight, impact and process speed.
Our software is offered through traditional on-premises solutions, on Form 10-K: (i) the term "Fiscal 2017" meansOpenText Cloud or a combination of both. We believe our fiscal year beginning on July 1, 2016customers will operate in hybrid on-premises and ending June 30, 2017; (ii)cloud environments, and we are ready to support the term “Fiscal 2016” meansdelivery method the customer prefers. In providing choice and flexibility, we strive to maximize the lifetime value of the relationship with our fiscal year beginning on July 1, 2015 and ended June 30, 2016; (iii) the term “Fiscal 2015” means our fiscal year beginning on July 1, 2014 and ended June 30, 2015; and (iv) the term “Fiscal 2014” means our fiscal year beginning on July 1, 2013 and ended June 30, 2014; and (v) the term "Fiscal 2013" means our fiscal year beginning July 1, 2012 and ended June 30, 2013. Our Consolidated Financial Statements are presented in U.S. dollars and, unless otherwise indicated, all amounts included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are expressed in U.S. dollars.customers.
Business Overview and Strategy
We operateAbout OpenText
For more than 25 years, we have developed enterprise software to help customers create a sustainable information advantage in the Enterprise Information Management (EIM) market.digital economy. We are an independent company providinghave a vision of the "Intelligent and Connected Enterprise" enabling businesses and

governments to accelerate their digital transformation. The comprehensive OpenText EIM platform and suite of software products and services provide secure and scalable solutions for global companies and governments around the world. With our software, organizations manage a valuable asset - information. Information that assistis made more valuable by connecting it to digital business processes, information that is enriched with analytics, information that is protected and secure throughout its entire lifecycle, information that captivates customers, and information that connects and fuels some of the world's largest digital supply chains in manufacturing, retail, and financial services. Our EIM solutions are designed to enable organizations in finding, utilizing,to secure their information so that they can collaborate with confidence, validate endpoints with all machines and sharing businessthe Internet of Things (IoT), stay ahead of the regulatory technology curve, identify threats that cross their networks, leverage discovery with information forensics, and gain insight and action through analytics, artificial intelligence (AI) and automation.
At OpenText, we follow the big workloads and the unstructured content from customer information and case files, to employee information, transactions and interactions along the supply chain, to information used to manage assets such as planes, trains, automobiles, nuclear power plants, and oil rigs, to industry accelerators like information technology (IT) and innovation platforms.
Our Products and Services
We combine digital applications with an information platform, bringing together Content Services, Business Networks (BN), Analytics and AI, Security and the Developer for optimized customer experience, employee engagement, asset utilization, and supply chain efficiency. Our software capabilities bring together information from any deviceboth humans and machines, where it can be securely managed, stored, accessed and mined with analytics for actionable and relevant insights.graphica01.jpg
*Off-cloud is a term we use to describe license transactions

Below is a listing of our EIM solutions. In all of this, the developer is critical to the development of "secure-from-day-1" applications. This is why our EIM platform expands our low-code development capabilities with additional out-of-the-box integrations designed to support the developer with a unified application development environment. In addition, with our cloud-based IoT platform, the enterprise can dynamically integrate multi-tiered supply chain communities and build IoT solutions for greater efficiency, agility, and new value-added services. Information from machines is supported, whether it's a smart machine, industrial machine, or an automotive or medical device.
Content Services
Content Services, such as Extended Enterprise Content Management (ECM) and records management, integrate with platforms, such as SAP, to manage the entire lifecycle of information, in waysits many formats, from creation through to disposition.

Our Content Services help organizations connect content to their digital business to accelerate productivity, improve governance and drive digital transformation. Additionally, OpenText Content Services adhere to the Content Management Interoperability Services (CMIS) standard and support a broad range of operating systems, databases, application servers, and enterprise applications. Our Content Services solutions range from intelligent capture to records management and archiving and are available on-premises, as a subscription in the OpenText Cloud or as a managed service.
Business Network
The OpenText Business Network (BN) supports intelligent connections at a global scale providing a proven foundation for digital business and secure e-commerce.
Our BN is a cloud-based platform that facilitates efficient, secure and compliant collaboration and exchange of information inside and outside of organizations. The platform comprises solutions that simplify the inherent complexities of business-to-business (B2B) data exchange and offer insights that help drive operational efficiencies, accelerate time to transaction and improve customer satisfaction. Our BN enables businesses to accelerate and control how information is delivered which we believe increases the security and reliability of sensitive or complex communications.
Artificial Intelligence and Analytics
The OpenText Artificial Intelligence platform incorporates Apache Spark, the powerful, open source computing foundation that lets customers take advantage of the flexibility, extensibility, and diversity of an open product stack while maintaining full ownership of their data and algorithms. As our enterprise software has historically focused on managing data and content archives, we are intuitive, efficientnow able to turn these archives of data into active “data lakes” and productive. incorporate AI to transform this digital information into useful knowledge and insight for our customers.
Our technologiesanalytics and AI suite helps organizations improve decision-making, gain operational efficiency and increase visibility by enabling IT to place interactive dashboards, reports and data visualizations quickly into the hands of business solutions addressusers. Our AI leverages a comprehensive set of data analytics software to identify patterns, relationships and trends. Our analytics and AI suite can leverage structured or unstructured data to help organizations increase their opportunities for growth.
Security
The OpenText EIM platform offers multi-level, multi-role, multi context security to make it one of the biggest problems encounteredmost secure information platforms in the world. Information is secured at the database level, by enterprises today: the explosive growthuser enrolled security, context rights, and time-based security. Our EIM platform supports single sign-on for system protection and encryption at rest for document-level security.
OpenText security also helps organizations address information security and digital investigation needs with leading digital forensic tools for endpoint detection and response. EncaseTM provides 360-degree visibility across all endpoints, devices and networks, for proactive discovery of information volumesensitive data, identification and formats. remediation of threats and discreet, forensically-sound data collection and investigation.
Digital Process Automation (DPA)
Our software and services allowDPA enables organizations to manage the information that flowstransform into out of,digital, data-driven businesses through automation. Our DPA solutions simplify and throughout thestreamline processes from front office to back office with intelligent automation, artificial intelligence and ready access to valuable enterprise as part of daily operations. Our solutions help to improve customer satisfaction and digital experience, gain analytical insight, improve collaboration with business partners, address the legal and business requirements associated with information governance, and help to ensure that information remains secure and private, as demanded in today's highly regulated climate.information.
Enterprise Information Management
There are two main information management pillars: Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), which typically contains structured data, and Enterprise Information Management (EIM), which typically contains unstructured data. EIM is the moniker given to the discipline of handling all unstructured data within and between an enterprise and other organizations. Unstructured data typically represents a significant amount of an organization's data.
Unstructured data encompasses everything from email and business processes to the handling of office and PDF documents, and even communicative, transient data like fax transfers, collaborative communications, and large managed files. This type of data composes the preponderance of information amassed and managed by today's enterprise systems. It holds

huge volumes of unlocked value for organizations poised to capitalize on their enterprise information strategy. It is our belief that companies will place themselves in an untenable situation for the future if they are not able to capture, preserve and make unstructured data usable.
We envisage a future where unstructured data is easily and seamlessly discovered, captured, managed, governed, secured, leveraged, analyzed and transformed into great value using information based applications. We call this discipline EIM. EIM data is by its nature unstructured and follows the required EIM functional technologies of Enterprise Content Management (ECM), Business Process Management (BPM), Customer Experience Management (CEM), Business Networking (BN), Discovery
CEM is a set of processes used to track customer interactions throughout the customer journey. The purpose of CEM is to gain insight into these customer interactions and Analytics. EIM can be deployedoptimize them to drive loyalty and improve customer lifetime value. Our CEM platform suite offers a set of CEM solutions and extensions that focus on its own to capture, manage,delivering highly personalized content and store enterprise information and integrates with ERP and other information management systems tocustomer engagement along a continuous customer journey. Our CEM suite also helps provide a "single source of truth"solid foundation for the enterprise.implementing a successful customer experience strategy.
ByDiscovery
Our Discovery suite provides leading forensics and unstructured data analytics for searching, collecting, and investigating enterprise data to manage legal obligations and risk. Our Discovery suite has powerful machine learning capabilities to help legal and compliance teams quickly find critical information for litigation discovery, investigations, compliance, data breach response, business projects, and financial contract analysis.

Our Strategy
Growth
As an organization, our management believes in delivering products and technologies capable of addressing entire information flows, our customers get a better-integrated and more agile solution. To manage and secure the flow of information through an enterprise,“Total Growth”, meaning we strive towards delivering value through organic initiatives, innovations and acquisitions, as well as financial performance. This growth is further enhanced through our direct and indirect sales distribution channels. With an emphasis on increasing recurring revenues and expanding our margins, we believe our “Total Growth” strategy will ultimately drive overall cash flow generation, thus helping to deliver well-integrated products that can be deployedfuel our disciplined capital allocation approach and further drive our ability to digitize any business process, managing information through its entire lifecycle.
Customers may align their EIM journey to the information flows illustrated below within their business. By "completing" each information flow, customers ensure the efficient governance, securitydeepen our account coverage and availability of the information that powers their organization. Information may "come online" through a variety of human or machine entry points, then proceed through its lifecycle or "flow" through disposition or destruction.
While we continue to offer on-premises solutions, we realize that the EIM market is broadidentify and execute strategic acquisitions. With strategic acquisitions, we are agnosticbetter positioned to whether a customer prefers an on-premises solution, cloud solution, or combination of both (hybrid).expand our product portfolio and improve our ability to innovate and grow organically, which then further helps us to meet our long-term growth targets. We believe givingthis “Total Growth” strategy is a durable model that will create shareholder value over both the near and long-term.
We are committed to continuous innovation. Our investments in research and development (R&D) drive product innovation, increasing the value of our offerings to our installed customer choicebase, which includes Global 10,000 companies. The Global 10,000 are the worlds largest companies, typically those with greater than $2billion in revenues, as well as the world's largest governments and flexibility willorganizations. More valuable products, coupled with our established global partner program, lead to greater distribution and cross-selling opportunities which further help us to strive to obtain long-term customer value. We measure long-term value by looking at our recurringachieve organic growth. Over the last three fiscal years, we have invested a cumulative total of approximately $926 million in R&D or approximately 11.6% of cumulative revenue earnings and operating cash flow. We define recurring revenue as the sum of our “Cloud services and subscriptions revenue”, “Customer support revenue” and “Professional services revenue”. In Fiscal 2016 recurring revenue was $1,541 million, which represented 84% of our total revenues and was relatively stable (down 1.1%) compared to Fiscal 2015. Our Cloud services and subscriptions revenues was also relatively stable (down 0.7%) in Fiscal 2016 compared to Fiscal 2015. Our net income for Fiscal 2016 was up 21% compared to Fiscal 2015 and our operating cash flow was relatively flat, growing 1% over the same period. We believe customers are looking for choice and flexibility in how they consume technologysuch three year period and we looktypically target to continuespend approximately 11% to provide long-term value to our customers.
Strategy13% of revenues for R&D each fiscal year.
We have historically grown our business and strengthened our service offerings in the EIM market through strategic acquisitions and integration, as well as organic growth. We believe we areremain a value oriented and disciplined acquirer and consolidator, having efficiently deployed $3.7$6.2 billion on acquisitions over the last 10 years. Mergers and acquisitions are one of our leading growth drivers. We believe in creating value by focusing on acquiring strategic businesses, integrating them into our business model and using our acquired assets to innovate. We have developed a philosophy, which we refer to as “The OpenText Business System”, that is designed to create value by leveraging a clear set of operational mandates for integrating newly acquired companies and assets. We see our ability to successfully integrate acquired

companies and assets into our business as a strength and pursuing strategic acquisitions is an important aspect to our growthTotal Growth strategy. We expect to continue to pursue strategic acquisitions in the futureacquire strategically, to integrate and innovate, to deepen and strengthen our service offerings in the EIM market. intelligent information platform for customers.
In Fiscal 2016,2019, we further demonstrated the implementation of thisour strategy by acquiring DaegisLiaison Technologies, Inc. (Daegis), ANXe Business Corporation (ANX),(Liaison) and certain CEM assets acquired from HPCatalyst Repository Systems Inc. (CEM Business)(Catalyst). We regularly evaluate acquisition opportunities on an ongoing basis and at any time may be at various stages of discussion with respect to such opportunities. For additional details on our acquisitions, please see "Acquisitions During the Last Five Fiscal Years", elsewhere in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
While continuingOur OpenText Release 16 platform (Release 16), helps organizations with their digital transformation by digitizing information, experiences, processes and supply chains, to acquire companiescreate a better way to work within their enterprise. Release 16 has a major focus on analysis and reporting across all product lines and use cases. It offers customers a coordinated platform for digital transformation that is our leading growth driver, our growth strategyintended to yield the benefits of scale and single-vendor interaction.
We also includes organic growth through internal innovation. Overintroduced OpenText OT2, the last three fiscal years, we have invested approximately $567 millionnext generation EIM as a service platform. With OT2, organizations can leverage existing investments in researchtheir on-premises platforms and development (R&D)extend solutions where cloud can quickly improve time to value, such as customer, supplier and we typically targetpartner collaboration. Delivering SaaS applications that extend existing solutions prevents new information silos and simplifies technology investment decisions by providing compelling enterprise applications for business users.
We continue to spend approximately 10% to 12% of revenues for R&D. We believe our ability to leverage our global presence is helpfulmake significant investments to our ability to grow organically.
In April, 2016 we introduced "OpenText Release 16" (Release 16), which is an integrated digital information platform that manages and analyzes the entire flow of information, addressing key areas of the user experience, machine-to-machine integration, automation and other aspects of managing unstructured data in a digital first organization.
This release is the most functionally and integration-complete EIM platform that we have released to date and we believe it is well suited to drive our go-to-market plan for years to come.
We see an opportunity to help our customers become “digital businesses”cloud infrastructure, and with products like Release 16 as well asand OT2, virtually all of our recent acquisitions, we believe we have a strong platform to integrate personalized analytics and insights onto our OpenText EIM suites of products which will further our vision to enable “the digital world” and strengthen our position among leadersare available in EIM.the "OpenText Cloud".

Looking Towards the Future
In Fiscal 20172020 we willintend to continue to implement strategies that are designed to:
Broaden Our Reach into EIM B2B Integration, Analytics, Discovery, andthrough the Cloud.Global 10,000. As technologies and customers become more sophisticated, we intend to be a leader in expanding the definition of traditional market sectors. This is the marquee target for EIM and organic growth. We have beencontinue to focus on connecting the G10K to our information platform and we believe we are well positioned to expand our penetration in this market.
Invest in the Cloud. The cloud is quickly becoming a leaderbusiness imperative. What used to be discussed as a potential option for managing budgets, is now a strategic direction that drives competitive positioning, product innovation, business agility, and cost management. We are committed to continue our investment in investingThe OpenText Cloud, which is a purpose-built cloud

environment for enterprise solutions spanning Information Management, Compliance, and B2B Integration. Supported by a global, scalable, and secure infrastructure, OpenText Cloud includes a foundational platform of technology services, and packaged business applications for industry and business processes. The OpenText Cloud enables organizations to protect and manage information in adjacent markets through acquisitions which have provided us with the technologypublic, private or hybrid deployments.
Deepen Existing Customer Footprint. We believe one of our greatest opportunities is to accelerate our time to market and increase our scale. We have also invested insell newly acquired technologies to address the growing influence of analytics and social, mobile, and cloud platforms on corporate information.
Deepen Customer Penetration. We intend to leverage our comprehensive solution set to deepen our existing customer relationships.base, and cross-sell historical OpenText products to newly acquired customers. We have significant expertise in a number of industry sectors and aim to increase our customer penetration based on our strong credentials. We are particularly focused on circumstances where the customer is looking to consolidate multiple vendors with solutions from a single source while addressing a broader spectrum of business problems or equally new or existing customers looking to take a more holistic approach to digital transformation.
Invest in Technology Leadership. We believe we are well-positioned to develop additional innovative solutions to address the evolving market. We plan to continue investing in technology innovation“innovation” by funding internal development as well as collaborating with third-parties.
Deepen Strategic Partnerships. OpenText is committed culturally, programmatically and strategically to be a partner-embracing company. Our partnerships with companies such as SAP SE, Google Cloud, Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Accenture, DeloitteCorporation, Salesforce.com Corporation and others serve as an example of how we are working together with our partners to create next-generation EIM solutions and deliver them to market. We will continue to look for ways to create more customer value from our strategic partnerships.
Broaden Global Presence. As customers become increasingly multi-national and as international markets continue to adopt EIM, we plan to further grow our brand, presence, and partner networks in these new markets. We are focused on using our direct sales for targeting existing customers and plan to address new geographies jointly with our partners.
Selectively Pursue Acquisitions. We expect to continue to pursue strategic acquisitions to strengthen our service offerings in the EIM market. In light of the continually evolving marketplace in which we operate, on an ongoing basis we regularly evaluate acquisition opportunities within the EIM market and at any time may be in various stages of discussions with respect to such opportunities. We plan to continue to pursue acquisitions that complement our existing business, represent a strong strategic fit and are consistent with our overall growth strategy and disciplined financial management. We may also target future acquisitions to expand or add functionality and capabilities to our existing portfolio of solutions, as well as add new solutions to our portfolio.
Products and Services Overview
Our products and services are designed to provide the benefits of maximizing the value of enterprise information while largely minimizing its risks. Our solutions incorporate collaborative and mobile technologies and are delivered for on-premises deployment as well as through cloud, hybrid and managed hosted services models to provide the flexibility and cost efficiencies demanded by the market. In addition, we provide solutions that facilitate the exchange of information and transactions that occur between supply chain participants, such as manufacturers, retailers, distributors and financial institutions, and are central to a company’s ability to effectively collaborate with its partners.

At its core, EIM is about helping organizations get the most out of information. Our EIM offerings include Enterprise Content Management, Business Process Management, Customer Experience Management, Business Network, Discovery and Analytics, and are designed to deliver to our customers:
(i)Increased compliance and information governance resulting in reduced exposure to risk of regulatory sanctions related to how information is handled and protected;
(ii)Improved operating efficiency through process digitization and automation;
(iii)Better customer engagement through improved and integrated digital experiences and content delivery;
(iv)Lower cost of storage and management of information through improved classification and archiving strategies;
(v)Reduced infrastructure costs due to, among other factors, legacy decommissioning capabilities of EIM and cloud and hosted services deployment models;
(vi)Improved innovation, productivity and time-to-market as a result of letting employees, trading partners and customers work with information and collaborate in ways which are intuitive, automated, and flexible; and
(vii)Increased revenue streams with the enablement of easy expansion across new channels and, ultimately, new markets.
*For illustrative purposes only and is not an exhaustive list of our product offerings.

Release 16 helps organizations with their digital transformation by digitizing information, experiences, processes and supply chains, to create a better way to work within their enterprise. Release 16 also has a major focus on analysis and reporting across all product lines and use cases. It offers customers a coordinated platform for digital transformation that is intended to yield the benefits of scale and single-vendor interaction. We have made significant investments to our cloud infrastructure over the past couple of years, and now with Release 16 virtually all of our products are available in the "OpenText Cloud".
Our portfolio is comprised of capabilities in the following areas:
Enterprise Content Management
We facilitate ECM with an integrated set of technologies that manage information throughout its lifecycle and improve business productivity, all while mitigating the risk and controlling the costs of growing volumes of content. Our ECM solutions, which are available on-premises and increasingly in the cloud, include:
Content Management provides a repository for business documents (such as those created with Microsoft Office, AutoCAD and Adobe Acrobat/PDF) and allows for the organizing, displaying, classifying, access control, version control, event auditing, rendition, and search of documents and other content types.
Records Management enables control of the complete lifecycle of content management by associating retention and disposition rules to control if and when content can or must be deleted or archived on storage media.
Archiving helps reduce storage expenses through optimization of storage use. It manages content storage policies according to business context, optimizes storage use, and provides high-end storage services to reduce future storage demands.

Email Management Solutions enable the archiving, control and monitoring of email, regardless of platform, to reduce the size of the email database, improve email server performance, control the lifecycle of email content, and monitor email content to improve compliance.
Capture solutions help bridge the gap between structured and unstructured data by providing the ability to capture and image paper content while applying metadata and applicable policies and schedules. By transforming the information contained in these documents, it can then be used effectively to automate or streamline business processes while being governed consistently alongside digital content.
Core is a software as a service (SaaS)-based, multi-tenant cloud solution that provides efficient ways to share documents and collaborate for teams of any size, from small groups to large enterprises.
Business Process Management
BPM provides the software capabilities for analyzing, automating, monitoring and optimizing structured business processes that typically fall outside the scope of existing enterprise systems. BPM solutions help empower employees, customers and partners. Our BPM solutions include:
Process suite platform puts the business in direct control of its processes and fosters alignment between business and IT, resulting in tangible benefits for both. OpenText Process Suite Platform offers one platform that can be accessed simply through a web browser and is built from the ground up to be truly multi-tenant and to support all of the deployment models required for on-premise, private or public clouds.
Capture and recognition systems convert documents from analog sources, such as paper or facsimile (fax), to electronic documents and apply value-added functions, such as optical / intelligent character recognition (OCR/ICR) and barcode scanning, and then releases these documents into repositories where they can be stored, managed, and searched.
Process suite solutions are packaged applications built on the Process Suite and address specific business problems. This includes Contract Management, Cloud Brokerage Services, Digital Media Supply Chain, and Enterprise App Store, to name a few.
Customer Experience Management
CEM generates improved time-to-market by giving customers, employees, and channel partners personalized and engaging experiences. Our CEM solutions include:
Web Content Management provides software for authoring, maintaining, and administering websites designed to offer a “visitor experience” that integrates content from internal and external sources.
Digital Asset Management provides a set of content management services for browsing, searching, viewing, assembling, and delivering rich media content such as images, audio and video.
Customer Communications Management software makes it possible for organizations to process and deliver highly personalized documents in paper or electronic format rather than a “one message fits all” approach.
Social Software helps companies “socialize” their web presence by adding blogs, wikis, ratings and reviews, and build communities for public websites and employee intranets.
Portal enables organizations to aggregate, integrate and personalize corporate information and applications and provide a central, contextualized, and personalized view of information for executives, departments, partners, and customers.
Business Network
The OpenText Business Network (BN), previously known as Information Exchange (iX), is a set of offerings that facilitate efficient, secure, and compliant exchange of information inside and outside the enterprise. BN solutions include:
Business-to-Business (B2B) Integration services help optimize the reliability, reach, and cost efficiency of an enterprise's electronic supply chain while reducing costs, infrastructure and overhead.
Fax Solutions automate business fax and electronic document distribution to improve the business impact of company information, increase employee productivity and decrease paper-based operational costs.
Secure Messaging helps to share and synchronize files across an organization, across teams and with business partners, while leveraging the latest smartphones and tablets to provide information on the go without sacrificing information governance or security.

Analytics
Analytics solutions help organizations gain insight from their structured and unstructured information, make predictions, visualize and report on business processes, customer interactions and a myriad of other sources of information. This analytical data can then be used to refine business processes or content utilization, make predictions, identify trends, improve customer service or be applied in a multitude of different scenarios. OpenText Analytics solutions include:
Embedded Reporting and Visualization is used to embed reports and visualizations of data in an array of applications, including the OpenText EIM Suites and many third party data sources.
Big Data Analysis is the analysis of large sets of information from databases, files, ERP and Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems and a variety of other sources. Modeling and predictive algorithms may be applied to this data using OpenText solutions to extract meaningful insight or predictive models to solve customer problems or help with operational insight.
Discovery
Discovery solutions organize and visualize all relevant content and make it possible for business users to quickly locate information and make better informed decisions based on timely, contextualized information. Discovery solutions include:
Search addresses information security and productivity requirements by securely indexing all information for fast retrieval and real-time monitoring.
Semantic Navigation improves the end-user experience of websites by enabling intuitive visual exploration of site content through contextual navigation.
Auto-Classification improves the quality of information governance through intelligent metadata extraction and accurate classification of information.
InfoFusion makes it possible for organizations to deal with the issue of so-called “information silos” resulting from, for instance, numerous disconnected information sources across the enterprise. Using a framework of adapters, an information access platform allows organizations to consolidate, decommission, archive and migrate content from virtually any system or information repository.

OpenText Revenues
Our business consists of four revenue streams: license, cloud services and subscriptions, customer support, and professional service and other. For information regarding our revenues and assets by geography for Fiscal 2016,2019, Fiscal 20152018 and Fiscal 2014,2017, see note 19 “Segment Information” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
License
License revenues consist of fees earned from the licensing of software products to our customers. Our license revenues are impacted by the strength of general economic and industry conditions, the competitive strength of our software products, and our acquisitions. The decision by a customer to license our software products often involves a comprehensive implementation process across the customer’s network or networks and the licensing and implementation of our software products may entail a significant commitment of resources by prospective customers. As revenue from cloud services and subscriptions has increased in recent years, license revenues have decreased as a proportion of our total revenues.
Cloud servicesServices and subscriptionsSubscriptions
Cloud services and subscription revenues consist of (i) software as a serviceSaaS offerings, (ii) hosted services and (iii) managed service arrangements and  (iii) subscription revenues relating to on premise offerings.arrangements. These offerings allow customers to transmit a variety of content between various mediums and to securely manage enterprise information without the commitment of investing in related hardware infrastructure.
In addition, weWe offer B2B integration solutions such as messaging services, and managed services. Messaging services allow for the automated and reliable exchange of electronic transaction information, such as purchase orders, invoices, shipment notices and other business documents, among businesses worldwide. Managed services provide an end-to-end fully outsourced B2B integration solution to our customers, including program implementation, operational management, and customer support. These services enableOur cloud-based Business Network enables customers to effectively manage the flow of electronic transaction information with their trading partners and reducereduces the complexity of disparate standards and communication protocols.

Customer Support
The first year of our customer support offering is usually purchased by customers together with the license of our EIM software products. Customer support is typically renewed on an annual basis and historically customer support revenues have been a significant portion of our total revenue. Through our OpenText customer support programs, customers receive access to software upgrades, a knowledge base, discussions, product information, and an online mechanism to post and review “trouble tickets”. Additionally, our customer support teams handle questions on the use, configuration, and functionality of OpenText products and can help identify software issues, develop solutions, and document enhancement requests for consideration in future product releases.
Professional Service and Other
We provide consulting and learning services to customers and generally these services relate to the implementation, training and integration of our licensed product offerings into the customer's systems.
Our consulting services help customers build solutions that enable them to leverage their investments in our technology and in existing enterprise systems. The implementation of these services can range from simple modifications to meet specific departmental needs to enterprise applications that integrate with multiple existing systems.
Our learning services consultants analyze our customers' education and training needs, focusing on key learning outcomes and timelines, with a view to creating an appropriate education plan for the employees of our customers who work with our products. Education plans are designed to be flexible and can be applied to any phase of implementation: pilot, roll-out, upgrade or refresher. OpenText learning services employ a blended approach by combining mentoring, instructor-led courses, webinars, eLearning and focused workshops.
Marketing and Sales
Customers
Our customer base consists of a number of Global 10,000 organizations, as well asenterprise companies, mid-market companies and governmentpublic sector agencies. Historically, including in Fiscal 2016,2019, no single customer has accounted for 10% or more of our total revenues.
Global Distribution Channels
We operate on a global basis and in Fiscal 2016 we generated approximately 58% of our revenues from our “Americas” region, which consists of countries in North, Central, and South America, approximately 33% from our "EMEA" region, which primarily consists of countries in Europe, Africa, and the Middle East, and approximately 9% from our "Asia Pacific" region, which primarily consists of Japan, Australia, China, Korea, Philippines, Singapore and New Zealand. We make direct sales of products and services through our global network of subsidiaries.
Partners and Alliances
We are also market our products and services worldwide through indirect channels. We partner with prominent organizations in the enterprise software and hardware industries in an effortcommitted to enhance the value of our solutions and the investments our customers have made in their existing systems. We strive to create mutually beneficialestablishing relationships with global systems integrators, consultants,the best resellers and softwaretechnology and hardware developers that augment and extend our products and services. Through these relationships,service providers to ensure customer success. Together as partners, we and our partners are better able to fulfill key market objectives to drive new business, establish a competitive advantage, and create demonstrable business value.
Our strategic partners are:
OpenTextGlobal Partner Program enables us to focus on the core roots of our partnerships. The framework offers five distinct programs: Referral, Reseller, Services, Technology, and SAP AG (SAP)
OpenTextSupport. This creates an extended organization to develop technologies, repeatable service offerings, and SAP have shared many years of partnership and close collaboration. Our solutions help customers improvethat enhance the way they manage content from SAP systemsour customers maximize their investment in orderour products and services. Through the Global Partner Program, we are extending market coverage, building stronger relationships, and providing customers with a more complete local ecosystem of partners to assist themmeet their needs. Each distinct program is focused to improve efficiency in key processes, manage compliance and reduce costs. Our targeted solutions let customers create, access, manage and securely archive content for SAP systems, including data, multimedia content, and documents. In addition,provide valuable business benefits to the joint relationship. A complete listing of our solutions for SAP allow customers to address stringent requirements for risk reduction, operational efficiency and information technology consolidation. OpenText products are typically used by SAP customers as part of their key business processes.

OpenText and Microsoft Corporation(Microsoft)partners can be found on our website.
Our strategic alliance with Microsoft offers integration between our EIM solutions and Microsoft's desktop, cloud and server products, such as Microsoft SharePoint and Exchange, as well as Office 365 and SharePoint online. Microsoft and OpenText have partnered to drive the creation of comprehensive business and industry-specific EIM solutions leveraging customers' significant investments in the Microsoft platform and productivity applications. We provide support for Microsoft platforms such as Windows and SQL Server and integration with many Microsoft products such as Exchange, Rights Management and Windows Azure. The integration of our solutions with Microsoft Office and SharePoint allows an OpenText customer to work with information from ERP, CRM, EIM and other enterprise applications from within the Microsoft SharePoint or Microsoft Office interface.partners include:
SAP SE (SAP): Our solutions help SAP customers improve the way they manage content in SAP systems in order to assist them to improve efficiency in key processes, manage compliance, or gain new insights.
Google Cloud: We work together with Google Cloud to deploy our EIM solutions on the Google Cloud Platform. This includes a containerized application architecture for flexible cloud or hybrid deployment models. Deploying our solutions on the Google Cloud Platform allows our customers to scale their deployments as their businesses demand. We also work with the Google Cloud engineering team to explore integrations with Google Analytics, G-Suite and other functions.
Microsoft Corporation (Microsoft): Our partnership enables organizations to connect all aspects of their content infrastructure and take advantage of their most valuable asset - information. This helps organizations to better scale operations with confidence and improve IT and developer efficiency - all with the aim of obtaining a lower total cost of ownership over competitive solutions.
Oracle Corporation (Oracle): We develop innovative solutions for Oracle applications that enhance the experience and productivity of users working with these tools.
OpenText and Oracle Corporation (Oracle)
Salesforce.com Corporation (Salesforce): The company-to-company partnership between OpenText and Salesforce is focused on continuing to grow a full portfolio of EIM solutions to complement the Salesforce ecosystem by uniting the structured and unstructured information experience.
For more than ten years, OpenText has developed innovative solutions for Oracle applications that enhance the experience and productivity of users working with these tools. OpenText is committed to continued development that extends and enhances the Oracle application and technology portfolio. Our partnership extends our enterprise solutions framework with integration between OpenText and Oracle eBusiness Suite, analogous to our integration with SAP.
Ourmain global systems integrators are:
include, but are not limited to, Accenture plc, (Accenture)
Accenture, a global management consulting, technology services and outsourcing company, is one of our systems integrator partners. Together we provide strategic EIM solutions. Accenture's extensive experience with enterprise-rollout planning and design, combined with our EIM technology, provides solutions designed to address an organization's EIM requirements.
Deloitte Consulting LLP, (Deloitte)
Deloitte is also one of our systems integrator partners. Together, we help organizations build value through improved ECM performance. Deloitte's services provide value across human capital, strategyTata Consultancy Services, ATOS and operations, and technology within multiple industries.
Other System Integrators
Other OpenText systems integrator partners include Cap Gemini Inc., CGI Group Inc. (through its acquisition of Logica plc), ATOS SE, EY and others.Ernst & Young.
International Markets
We provide our product offerings worldwide.Our geographic coverage allows us to draw on business and technical expertise from a geographically diverse workforce, providing greater stability to our operations and revenue streams by diversifying our portfolio to better mitigate against the risks of a single geographically focused business.
There are inherent risks to conducting operations internationally. For more information about these risks, see “Risk Factors” included in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Competition
The market for our products and services is highly competitive, subject to rapid technological change and shifting customer needs and economic pressures. We compete with multiple companies, some that have single or narrow solutions and some that have a range of information management solutions, like ourselves.us. Our competitors includeprimary competitor is International Business Machines Corporation (IBM), EMC Corporation (EMC)with numerous other software vendors competing with us in the EIM sector, such as Veeva Systems Inc., Hewlett Packard Enterprisej2 Global Inc., Pegasystems Inc., Hyland Software Inc., SPS Commerce Inc., Box Inc. and Adobe Systems Inc. In certain markets, OpenText competes with Oracle and Microsoft, who are also our partners. In addition, there are numerous, other niche software vendors in the Information Management sector, such as j2 Inc. and Pegasystems Inc., that compete with OpenText in certain segments of the EIM market. Wewe also face competition from systems integrators that configure hardware and software into customized systems. Additionally, new competitors or alliances among existing competitors may emerge and could rapidly acquire additional market share. We also expect that competition will increase as a result of ongoing software industry consolidation.
We believe that the principalcertain competitive factors affectingaffect the market for our software products and services, which may include: (i) vendor and product reputation; (ii) product quality, performance and price; (iii) the availability of software products on multiple platforms; (iv) product scalability; (v) product integration with other enterprise applications; (vi) software functionality and features; (vii) software ease of use; (viii) the quality of professional services, customer support services and training; and (ix) the ability to address specific customer business problems. We believe the relative importance of each of these factors depends upon the concerns and needs of each specific customer.

Research and Development
The industry in which we compete is subject to rapid technological developments, evolving industry standards, changes in customer requirements and competitive new products and features. As a result, our success, in part, depends on our ability to continue to enhance our existing products in a timely and efficient manner and to develop and introduce new products that meet customer needs while reducing total cost of ownership. To achieve these objectives, we have made and expect to continue to make investments in research and development, through internal and third-party development activities, third-party licensing agreements and potentially through technology acquisitions. Our research and developmentR&D expenses were $194.1$321.8 million for Fiscal 2016, $196.52019, $322.9 million for Fiscal 2015,2018, and $176.8$281.2 million for Fiscal 2014.2017. We believe our spending on research and development is an appropriate balance between managing our organic growth and results of operation.operations. We expect to continue to invest in research and developmentR&D to maintain and improve our products and services offerings.
Acquisitions During the Last Five Fiscal Years
Our competitive position in the marketplace requires us to maintain a complex and evolving array of technologies, products, services and capabilities. In light of the continually evolving marketplace in which we operate, we regularly evaluate acquisition opportunities within the EIM market and at any time may be in various stages of discussions with respect to such opportunities.
Pursuing strategic acquisitions is an important aspect to our current and future growth strategy, which we expect to continue, in order to strengthen our service offerings in the EIM market. In Fiscal 2016 we acquired Daegis, ANX and CEM Business. Daegis was a global software and services company. Its acquisition brings a broad range of information governance expertise and technology to OpenText, which we believe better enables our customers to mitigate the risks and costs associated with "information sprawl" and the permanent retention of information. ANX was a leading provider of cloud-based information exchange services to the U.S. automotive and healthcare industries, which we believe complements our existing B2B integration solutions while strengthening our presence in these industries. Lastly, in Fiscal 2016 we also acquired CEM Business that we believe complement our current offerings in CEM and related cloud offerings, while providing our customers with leading software products in marketing optimization, mobile marketing and in “voice” of the customer programs.
Below is a summary of the more material acquisitions we have made over the last five fiscal years.
In Fiscal 2016,2019, we completed the following acquisitions:
On January 31, 2019, we acquired Catalyst for approximately $70.8 million.
On May 1, 2016,On December 17, 2018, we acquired ANXe Business Corporation,Liaison for approximately $310.6 million.


Prior to Fiscal 2019, we completed the following acquisitions:
On February 14, 2018, we acquired Hightail, a leading cloud service for file sharing and creative collaboration, for approximately $20.5 million.
On September 14, 2017, we acquired Guidance, a leading provider of cloud-basedforensic security solutions, for approximately $240.5 million.
On July 26, 2017, we acquired Covisint, a leading cloud platform for building Identity, Automotive,and IoT applications, for approximately $102.8 million.
On January 23, 2017, we acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of the enterprise content division of EMC Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation, and certain of its subsidiaries (ECD Business) for approximately $1.62 billion.
On July 31, 2016, we acquired certain customer communications management software services assets and liabilities from HP Inc. (CCM Business) for approximately $315.0 million.
On July 20, 2016, we acquired Recommind, a leading provider of eDiscovery and information exchange services to the automotive and healthcare industries,analytics, based in Michigan,San Francisco, California, United States. Total considerationStates, for ANX was approximately $104.6$170.1 million.
On May 1, 2016, we acquired ANXe Business Corporation (ANX), a leading provider of cloud-based information exchange services to the automotive and healthcare industries, based in Michigan, United States. Total consideration for ANX was approximately $104.6 million.
On April 30, 2016, we acquired certain customer experience software and services assets and liabilities from HP Inc. (CEM Business) for approximately $160.0 million.
On November 23, 2015, we acquired Daegis Inc. (Daegis), a global information governance, data migration solutions and development company, based in Texas, United States. Total consideration for Daegis was approximately $23.3 million.
Prior to Fiscal 2016, we completed the following acquisitions:
On January 16, 2015, we acquired Actuate Corporation (Actuate), based in San Francisco, California, United States, for $332.0 million, comprised of approximately $322.4 million in cash and shares we purchased of Actuate in the open market with a fair value of approximately $9.5 million as of the date of acquisition. Actuate was a leader in personalized analytics and insights.
On January 2, 2015, we acquired Informative Graphics Corporation (IGC), based in Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, for approximately $40.0 million. IGC was a leading developer of viewing, annotation, redaction and publishing commercial software.
On January 16, 2014, we acquired GXS Group Inc. (GXS), a Delaware corporation and leader in cloud-based B2B integration services for $1.2 billion, inclusive of the issuance of 2,595,042 OpenText Common Shares.
On August 15, 2013, we acquired Cordys Holding B.V. (Cordys), a leading provider of BPM and case management solutions, offered on one platform with cloud, mobile, and social capabilities, based in Putten, the Netherlands for $33.2 million.
On May 23, 2013, we acquired ICCM Professional Services Limited (ICCM), a company based in Malmesbury, United Kingdom, for $18.9 million. ICCM is a provider of IT service management software solutions.
On March 5, 2013, we acquired Resonate KT Limited (RKT), a company based in Cardiff, United Kingdom, for $20.0 million. RKT was a leading provider of software that enables organizations to visualize unstructured data, create new user experiences for ECM and xECM for SAP, as well as build industry-based applications that maximize unstructured data residing within Content Server, a key component of the OpenText ECM suite.

On July 2, 2012, we acquired EasyLink Services International Corporation (EasyLink), a company based in Georgia, United States and a global provider of cloud-based electronic messaging and business integration services for $342.3 million.
On July 13, 2011, we acquired Global 360 Holding Corp. (Global 360), a software company based in Dallas, Texas, United States, for $256.6 million. Global 360 offers case management and document-centric BPM solutions. The acquisition continued our expansion into the BPM market and added to our technology, talent, services, partner and geographical strengths.
We believe our acquisitions support our long-term strategy for growth, strengthen our competitive position, expand our customer base and provide greater scale to accelerate innovation, grow our earnings and provide superior shareholder value. We expect to continue to strategically acquire companies, products, services and technologies to augment our existing business.
Intellectual Property Rights
Our success and ability to compete depends in part on our ability to develop, protect and maintain our intellectual property and proprietary technology and to operate without infringing on the proprietary rights of others. Our software products are generally licensed to our customers on a non-exclusive basis for internal use in a customer's organization. We also grant rights into our intellectual property to third parties that allow them to market certain of our products on a non-exclusive or limited-scope exclusive basis for a particular application of the product(s) or to a particular geographic area.
We rely on a combination of copyright, patent, trademark and trade secret laws, non-disclosure agreements and other contractual provisions to establish and maintain our proprietary rights. We have obtained or applied for trademark registration for most corporate and strategic product names in most major markets. We have a number of U.S. and foreign patents and pending applications, including patents and rights to patent applications acquired through strategic transactions, which relate to various aspects of our products and technology. The duration of our patents is determined by the laws of the country of issuance and for the U.S. is typically 17 years from the date of issuance of the patent or 20 years from the date of filing of the patent application resulting in the patent. From time to time, we may enforce our intellectual property rights through litigation in line with our strategic and business objectives. While we believe our intellectual property is valuable and our ability to maintain and protect our intellectual property rights is important to our success, we also believe that our business as a whole is not materially dependent on any particular patent, trademark, license, or other intellectual property right.
For more information on the risks related to our intellectual property rights, see "Risk Factors" included in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Employees
As of June 30, 2016,2019, we employed a total of approximately 8,90013,100 individuals. The approximate composition of our employee base is as follows: (i) 1,4002,100 employees in sales and marketing, (ii) 2,2003,700 employees in product development, (iii) 2,3003,100 employees in cloud services, (iv) 1,1001,500 employees in professional services, (v) 8001,100 employees in customer support, and (vi) 1,1001,600 employees in general and administrative roles. We believe that relations with our employees are strong. None of our employees are represented by a labour union, nor do we have collective bargaining arrangements with any of our employees. However, in certain international jurisdictions in which we operate, a “Workers' Council” represents our employees.
Available Information
Access toOpenText Corporation was incorporated on June 26, 1991. Our principal office is located at 275 Frank Tompa Drive, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 0A1, and our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these reports filed with or furnished to the SEC may be obtained free of charge through the Investors section of our websitetelephone number at investors.opentext.com as soon asthat location is reasonably practical after we electronically file or furnish these reports.(519) 888-7111. Our internet address is www.opentext.com. Our website is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K as an inactive textual reference only. Except for the documents specifically incorporated by reference into this Annual Report, information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and should not be considered to be a part of this Annual Report.
Access to our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these reports filed with or furnished to the SEC may be obtained free of charge through the Investors section of our website at investors.opentext.com as soon as is reasonably practical after we electronically file or furnish these reports. In addition, our filings with the SEC may be accessed through the SEC's website at www.sec.govand our filings with the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) may be accessed through the CSA's System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR) at www.sedar.com. Except for the documents specifically incorporated by reference into this Annual Report, information contained on the SEC or CSA websites is not incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K and should not be considered to be a part of the Annual Report. All statements made in any of our securities filings, including all forward-looking statements or information, are made as of the date of the document in which the statement is included, and we do not assume or undertake any obligation to update any of those statements or documents unless we are required to do so by applicable law.

Item 1A. Risk Factors
The following important factors could cause our actual business and financial results to differ materially from our current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections. These forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K or made elsewhere by management from time to time are subject to important risks, uncertainties and assumptions which are difficult to predict. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only risks and uncertainties facing us. Additional risks not currently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial may also impair our operating results, financial condition and liquidity. Our business is also subject to general risks and uncertainties that affect many other companies. The risks discussed below are not necessarily presented in order of importance or probability of occurrence.
The length of our sales cycle can fluctuate significantly which could result in significant fluctuations in license revenues being recognized from quarter to quarter
The decision by a customer to license our software products or purchase our services often involves a comprehensive implementation process across the customer's network or networks. As a result, the licensing and implementation of our software products and any related services may entail a significant commitment of resources by prospective customers, accompanied by the attendant risks and delays frequently associated with significant technology implementation projects. Given the significant investment and commitment of resources required by an organization to implement our software products, our sales cycle may be longer compared to other companies within our own industry, as well as companies in other industries. Also, because of changes in customer spending habits, it may be difficult for us to budget, forecast and allocate our resources properly. In weak economic environments, it is not uncommon to see reduced information technology spending. It may take several months, or even several quarters, for marketing opportunities to materialize. If a customer's decision to license our software or purchase our services is delayed or if the implementation of these software products takes longer than originally anticipated, the date on which we may recognize revenues from these licenses or sales would be delayed. Such delays and fluctuations could cause our revenues to be lower than expected in a particular period and we may not be able to adjust our costs quickly enough to offset such lower revenues, potentially negatively impacting our business, operating results and financial condition.

Our success depends on our relationships with strategic partners, distributors and third party service providers and any reduction in the sales efforts by distributors, or cooperative efforts from our partners or service from third party providers could materially impact our revenues
We rely on close cooperation with strategic partners for sales and software product development as well as for the optimization of opportunities that arise in our competitive environment. A portion of our license revenues is derived from the licensing of our software products through third parties. Also, a portion of our service revenues may be impacted by the level of service provided by third party service providers relating to Internet, telecommunications and power services. Our success will depend, in part, upon our ability to maintain access to existing channels of distribution and to gain access to new channels if and when they develop. We may not be able to retain a sufficient number of our existing distributors or develop a sufficient number of future distributors. Distributors may also give higher priority to the licensing or sale of software products and services other than ours (which could include competitors' products)products and services) or may not devote sufficient resources to marketing our software products.products and services. The performance of third party distributors and third party service providers is largely outside of our control, and we are unable to predict the extent to which these distributors and service providers will be successful in either marketing and licensing or selling our software products and services or providing adequate Internet, telecommunication and power services so that disruptions and outages are not experienced by our customers. A reduction in strategic partner cooperation or sales efforts, a decline in the number of distributors, a decision by our distributors to discontinue the licensing of our software products or a decline or disruption in third party services could cause users and the general public to perceive our software products and services as inferior and could materially reduce revenues. In addition, our financial results could be materially adversely affected if the financial condition of our distributors or third party service providers were to weaken. Some of our distributors and third party service providers may have insufficient financial resources and may not be able to withstand changes in business conditions, including economic weakness, industry consolidation and market trends.
If we do not continue to develop technologically advanced products that successfully integrate with the software products and enhancements used by our customers, future revenues and our operating results may be negatively affected
Our success depends upon our ability to design, develop, test, market, license, sell and support new software products and services and enhancements of current products and services on a timely basis in response to both competitive threats and marketplace demands. The software industry is increasingly focused on cloud computing, mobility, social media and software as a service (SaaS)SaaS among other continually evolving shifts. In addition, our software products, services, and enhancements must remain compatible with standard platforms and file formats. Often, we must integrate software licensed or acquired from third parties with our proprietary software to create or improve our products. If we are unable to achieve a successful integration with third party software, we may not be successful in developing and marketing our new software products, services, and enhancements. If we are unable to successfully integrate third party software to develop new software products, services, and enhancements to existing software products and services, or to complete the development of new software products and services which we license or acquire from third parties, our operating results will materially suffer. In addition, if

the integrated or new products or enhancements do not achieve acceptance by the marketplace, our operating results will materially suffer. Moreover, if new industry standards emerge that we do not anticipate or adapt to, or with rapid technological change occurring, if alternatives to our services and solutions are developed by our competitors, our software products and services could be rendered less competitive or obsolete, causing us to lose market share and, as a result, harm our business and operating results, and our ability to compete in the marketplace.
If our software products and services do not gain market acceptance, our operating results may be negatively affected
We intend to pursue our strategy of being a market leading consolidator for cloud-based EIM solutions, and growing the capabilities of our EIM software offerings through our proprietary research and the development of new software product and service offerings, as well as through acquisitions. In response to customer demand, it is important to our success that we continue to enhance our software products and services and to seek to set the standard for EIM capabilities. The primary market for our software products and services is rapidly evolving which means that the level of acceptance of products and services that have been released recently, including Release 16, or that are planned for future release byto the marketplace is not certain. If the markets for our software products and services fail to develop, develop more slowly than expected or become subject to increased competition, our business may suffer. As a result, we may be unable to: (i) successfully market our current products and services, (ii) develop new software products and services and enhancements to current software products and services, (iii) complete customer implementations on a timely basis, or (iv) complete software products and services currently under development. In addition, increased competition could put significant pricing pressures on our products which could negatively impact our margins and profitability. If our software products and services are not accepted by our customers or by other businesses in the marketplace, our business, operating results and financial condition will be materially adversely affected.

Our existing customers might cancel contracts with us, fail to renew contracts on their renewal dates, and/or fail to purchase additional services and products, and we may be unable to attract new customers, which could materially adversely affect our operating results
We depend on our installed customer base for a significant portion of our revenues. We have significant contracts with our license customers for ongoing support and maintenance, as well as significant service contracts that provide recurring services revenues to us. In addition, our installed customer base has historically generated additional new license and services revenues for us. Service contracts are generally renewable at a customer’s option and/or subject to cancellation rights, and there are generally no mandatory payment obligations or obligations to license additional software or subscribe for additional services.
If our customers fail to renew or cancel their service contracts or fail to purchase additional services or products, then our revenues could decrease and our operating results could be materially adversely affected. Factors influencing such contract terminations and failure to purchase additional services or products could include changes in the financial circumstances of our customers, dissatisfaction with our products or services, our retirement or lack of support for our legacy products and services, our customers selecting or building alternate technologies to replace us, the cost of our products and services as compared to the cost of products and services offered by our competitors, our ability to attract, hire and maintain qualified personnel to meet customer needs, consolidating activities in the market, changes in our customers’ business or in regulation impacting our customers’ business that may no longer necessitate the use of our products or services, general economic or market conditions, or other reasons. Further, our customers could delay or terminate implementations or use of our services and products or be reluctant to migrate to new products. Such customers will not generate the revenues we may have anticipated within the timelines anticipated, if at all, and may be less likely to invest in additional services or products from us in the future. We may not be able to adjust our expense levels quickly enough to account for any such revenue losses.
Our investment in our current research and development efforts may not provide a sufficient, timely return
The development of EIM software products is a costly, complex and time-consuming process, and the investment in EIM software product development often involves a long wait until a return is achieved on such an investment. We are making, and will continue to make, significant investments in software research and development and related product and service opportunities. Investments in new technology and processes are inherently speculative. Commercial success depends on many factors, including the degree of innovation of the software products and services developed through our research and development efforts, sufficient support from our strategic partners, and effective distribution and marketing. Accelerated software product introductions and short product life cycles require high levels of expenditures for research and development. These expenditures may adversely affect our operating results if they are not offset by revenue increases. We believe that we must continue to dedicate a significant amount of resources to our research and development efforts in order to maintain our competitive position. However, significant revenues from new software product and service investments may not be achieved for a number of years, if at all. Moreover, new software products and services may not be profitable, and even if they are profitable, operating margins for new software products and services may not be as high as the margins we have experienced for our current or historical software products and services.
Product development is a long, expensive and uncertain process, and we may terminate one or more of our development programs
We may determine that certain software product candidates or programs do not have sufficient potential to warrant the continued allocation of resources. Accordingly, we may elect to terminate one or more of our programs for such product candidates. If we terminate a software product in development in which we have invested significant resources, our prospects may suffer, as we will have expended resources on a project that does not provide a return on our investment and we may have missed the opportunity to have allocated those resources to potentially more productive uses and this may negatively impact our business, operating results and financial condition.
Failure to protect our intellectual property could harm our ability to compete effectively
We are highly dependent on our ability to protect our proprietary technology. We rely on a combination of copyright, patent, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as non-disclosure agreements and other contractual provisions to establish and maintain our proprietary rights. We intend to protect our intellectual property rights vigorously; however, there can be no assurance that these measures will, in all cases, be successful.successful, and these measures can be costly and/or subject us to counterclaims. Enforcement of our intellectual property rights may be difficult, particularly in some countries outside of North America in which we seek to market our software products and services. While U.S.Canadian and CanadianU.S. copyright laws, international conventions and international treaties may provide meaningful protection against unauthorized duplication of software, the laws of some foreign jurisdictions may not protect proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of Canada or the United States. The absence of internationally harmonized intellectual property laws makes it more difficult to ensure consistent

protection of our proprietary rights. Software piracy has been, and is expected to be, a persistent problem for the software industry, and piracy of our software products represents a loss of revenue to us. Where

applicable, certain of our license arrangements have required us to make a limited confidential disclosure of portions of the source code for our software products, or to place such source code into escrow for the protection of another party. Despite the precautions we have taken, unauthorized third parties, including our competitors, may be able to copy certain portions of our software products or reverse engineer or obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. Also, our competitors could independently develop technologies that are perceived to be substantially equivalent or superior to our technologies. Our competitive position may be adversely affected by our possible inability to effectively protect our intellectual property. In addition, certain of our products contain open source software. Licensees of open source software may be required to make public certain source code, to license proprietary software for free or to make certain derivative works available to others. While we monitor and control the use of open source software in our products and in any third party software that is incorporated into our products, and we try to ensure that no open source software is used in such a way as to require us to disclose the source code to the related product or service, there can be no guarantee that such use could not inadvertently occur. If this happened it could harm our intellectual property position and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Other companies may claim that we infringe their intellectual property, which could materially increase costs and materially harm our ability to generate future revenues and profits
Claims of infringement (including misappropriation and/or other intellectual property violation) are becoming increasingly common asin the software industry develops and increasing as related legal protections, including copyrights and patents, are applied to software products. Although we do not believe that our products infringe on the rights of third parties, third parties have and will continue to assert infringement claims against us in the future. Although most of our technology is proprietary in nature, we do include certain third party and open source software in our software products. In the case of third party software, we believe this software is licensed from the entity holding the intellectual property rights. AlthoughWhile we believe that we have secured proper licenses for all third-party intellectual property that is integrated into our products, third parties have and may continue to assert infringement claims against us in the future, including the sometimes aggressive and opportunistic actions of non-practicing entities whose business model is to obtain patent-licensing revenues from operating companies such as us. Any such assertion, regardless of merit, may result in litigation or may require us to obtain a license for the intellectual property rights of third parties. Such licenses may not be available or they may not be available on commercially reasonable terms. In addition, as we continue to develop software products and expand our portfolio using new technology and innovation, our exposure to threats of infringement may increase. Any infringement claims and related litigation could be time-consuming, disruptive to our ability to generate revenues or enter into new market opportunities and may result in significantly increased costs as a result of our defense against those claims or our attempt to license the intellectual property rights or rework our products to avoid infringement of third party rights. Typically our agreements with our partners and customers contain provisions which require us to indemnify them for damages sustained by them as a result of any infringement claims involving our products. Any of the foregoing infringement claims and related litigation could have a significant adverse impact on our business and operating results as well as our ability to generate future revenues and profits.
The loss of licenses to use third-party software or the lack of support or enhancement of such software could adversely affect our business
We currently depend upon a limited number of third-party software products. If such software products were not available, we might experience delays or increased costs in the development of our own software products. For a limited number of our product modules, we rely on software products that we license from third-parties,third parties, including software that is integrated with internally developed software and which is used in our products to perform key functions. These third-party software licenses may not continue to be available to us on commercially reasonable terms and the related software may not continue to be appropriately supported, maintained, or enhanced by the licensors. The loss by us of the license to use, or the inability by licensors to support, maintain, or enhance any of such software, could result in increased costs, lost revenues or delays until equivalent software is internally developed or licensed from another third party and integrated with our software. Such increased costs, lost revenues or delays could adversely affect our business.
Current and future competitors could have a significant impact on our ability to generate future revenues and profits
The markets for our software products and services are intensely competitive and are subject to rapid technological change and other pressures created by changes in our industry. The convergence of many technologies has resulted in unforeseen competitors arising from companies that were traditionally not viewed as threats to our marketplace. We expect competition to increase and intensify in the future as the pace of technological change and adaptation quickens and as additional companies enter our markets, including those competitors who offer solutions similar solutions as we do,to ours, but offer it through a different form of delivery. Numerous releases of competitive products have occurred in recent history and are expected to continue in the future. We may not be able to compete effectively with current competitors and potential entrants into our marketplace. We could lose market share if our current or prospective competitors: (i) develop technologies that are perceived to be substantially equivalent or superior to our technologies, (ii) introduce new competitive products or services, (iii) add new

services, (ii) add new functionality to existing products and services, (iii)(iv) acquire competitive products and services, (iv)(v) reduce prices, or (v)(vi) form strategic alliances or cooperative relationships with other companies. If other businesses were to engage in aggressive pricing policies with respect to competing products, or if the dynamics in our marketplace resulted in increasing bargaining power by the consumers of our software products and services, we would need to lower the prices we charge for the products and services we offer. This could result in lower revenues or reduced margins, either of which may materially and adversely affect our business and operating results. Moreover, our competitors may affect our business by entering into exclusive arrangements with our existing or potential customers, distributors or third party service providers. Additionally, if prospective consumers choose other methods of EIM delivery different from that which we offer, our business and operating results could also be materially and adversely affected.
Acquisitions, investments, joint ventures and other business initiatives may negatively affect our operating results
The growth of our Company through the successful acquisition and integration of complementary businesses is a critical component of our corporate strategy. In light of the continually evolving marketplace in which we operate, on an ongoing basis we regularly evaluate acquisition opportunities within the EIM marketon an ongoing basis and at any time may be in various stages of discussions with respect to such opportunities. We plan to continue to pursue acquisitions that complement our existing business, represent a strong strategic fit and are consistent with our overall growth strategy and disciplined financial management. We may also target future acquisitions to expand or add functionality and capabilities to our existing portfolio of solutions, as well as add new solutions to our portfolio. We may also consider, from time to time, opportunities to engage in joint ventures or other business collaborations with third parties to address particular market segments. These activities create risks such as: (i) the need to integrate and manage the businesses and products acquired with our own business and products; (ii) additional demands on our resources, systems, procedures and controls; (iii) disruption of our ongoing business; and (iv) diversion of management's attention from other business concerns. Moreover, these transactions could involve: (a)(i) substantial investment of funds or financings by issuance of debt or equity or equity-related securities; (b)(ii) substantial investment with respect to technology transfers and operational integration; and (c)(iii) the acquisition or disposition of product lines or businesses. Also, such activities could result in charges and expenses and have the potential to either dilute the interests of existing shareholders or result in the issuance or assumption of debt, which could have a negative impact on the credit ratings of our outstanding debt securities.securities or the market price of our common shares. Such acquisitions, investments, joint ventures or other business collaborations may involve significant commitments of financial and other resources of our Company. Any such activity may not be successful in generating revenues, income or other returns to us, and the resources committed to such activities will not be available to us for other purposes. In addition, while we conduct due diligence prior to consummating an acquisition, joint venture or business collaboration, such diligence may not identify all material issues associated with such activities. We may also experience unanticipated challenges or difficulties identifying suitable new acquisition candidates that are available for purchase at reasonable prices. Even if we are able to identify such candidates, we may be unable to consummate an acquisition on suitable terms. Moreover, if we are unable to access capital markets on acceptable terms or at all, we may not be able to consummate acquisitions, or may have to do so on the basis of a less than optimal capital structure. Our inability (i) to take advantage of growth opportunities for our business or for our products and services, or (ii) to address risks associated with acquisitions or investments in businesses, may negatively affect our operating results.results and financial condition. Additionally, any impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets acquired in an acquisition or in an investment, or charges associated with any acquisition or investment activity, may materially impact our results of operations and financial condition which, in turn, may have ana material adverse material effect on the market price of our Common Shares or credit ratings of our outstanding debt securities.
Businesses we acquire may have disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting, cybersecurity and compliance with data privacy laws that are weaker than or otherwise not in conformity with ours
We have a history of acquiring complementary businesses of varying size and organizational complexity. Upon consummating an acquisition, we seek to implement our disclosure controls and procedures, as well as our internal controls over financial reporting as well as procedures relating to cybersecurity and compliance with data privacy laws and regulations at the acquired company as promptly as possible. Depending upon the nature and scale of the business acquired, the implementation of our disclosure controls and procedures as well as the implementation of our internal controls over financial reporting at an acquired company may be a lengthy process. We conduct due diligence prior to consummating an acquisition; however, such diligenceprocess and may not identify all material issues anddivert our attention from other business operations. Our integration efforts may periodically expose deficiencies in the disclosure controls and procedures as well as inand internal controls over financial reporting as well as procedures relating to cybersecurity and compliance with data privacy laws and regulations of an acquired company.company that were not identified in our due diligence undertaken prior to consummating the acquisition. If such deficiencies exist, we may not be in a position to comply with our periodic reporting requirements and, as a result, our business and financial condition may be materially harmed.

We may be unable to successfully integrate acquired businesses or do so within the intended timeframes,which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and business prospects
Our ability to realize the anticipated benefits of acquired businesses will depend, in part, on our ability to successfully and efficiently integrate acquired businesses and operations with our own. The integration of acquired operations with our existing business will be complex, costly and time-consuming, and may result in additional demands on our resources, systems, procedures and controls, disruption of our ongoing business, and diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns. Although we cannot be certain of the degree and scope of operational and integration problems that may arise, the difficulties and risks associated with the integration of acquired businesses may include, among others:  
the increased scope and complexity of our operations;

coordinating geographically separate organizations, operations, relationships and facilities;
integrating (i) personnel with diverse business backgrounds, corporate cultures and management philosophies, and (ii) the standards, policies and compensation structures, as well as the complex systems, technology, networks and other assets, of the companies;businesses;
preserving important strategic and customer relationships;
retention of key employees;
the possibility that we may have failed to discover liabilitiesobligations of acquired businesses or risks associated with those businesses during our due diligence investigations as part of the acquisition for which we, as a successor owner, may be responsible;responsible or subject to; and
provisions in contracts with third parties that may limit flexibility to take certain actions.
As a result of these difficulties and risks, we may not accomplish the integration of acquired businesses smoothly, successfully or within our budgetary expectations and anticipated timetables, which may result in a failure to realize some or all of the anticipated benefits of our acquisitions.
We may not generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy our unfunded pension obligations
Through our acquisitions, we have assumed certain unfunded pension plan liabilities. We will be required to use the operating cash flow that we generate in the future to meet these obligations. As a result, our future net pension liability and cost may be materially affected by the discount rate used to measure these pension obligations and by the longevity and actuarial profile of the relevant workforce. A change in the discount rate may result in a significant increase or decrease in the valuation of these pension obligations, and these changes may affect the net periodic pension cost in the year the change is made and in subsequent years. We cannot assure that we will generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy these obligations. Any inability to satisfy these pension obligations may have a material adverse effect on the operational and financial health of our business.
For more details see note 11 "Pension Plans and Other Post Retirement Benefits" to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Consolidation in the industry, particularly by large, well-capitalized companies, could place pressure on our operating margins which could, in turn, have a material adverse effect on our business
Acquisitions by large, well-capitalized technology companies have changed the marketplace for our software products and services by replacing competitors which are comparable in size to our Company with companies that have more resources at their disposal to compete with us in the marketplace. In addition, other large corporations with considerable financial resources either have products and/or services that compete with our software products and services or have the ability to encroach on our competitive position within our marketplace. These companies have considerable financial resources, channel influence, and broad geographic reach; thus, they can engage in competition with our software products and services on the basis of price, marketing, services or support. They also have the ability to introduce items that compete with our maturing software products and services. The threat posed by larger competitors and their ability to use their better economies of scale to sell competing products and services at a lower cost may materially reduce the profit margins we earn on the software products and services we provide to the marketplace. Any material reduction in our profit margin may have ana material adverse material effect on the operations or finances of our business, which could hinder our ability to raise capital in the public markets at opportune times for strategic acquisitions or general operational purposes, which may then prevent effective strategic growth, improved economies of scale or put us at a disadvantage to our better capitalized competitors.

We must continue to manage our internal resources during periods of company growth or our operating results could be adversely affected
The EIM market in which we compete continues to evolve at a rapid pace. Moreover, we have grown significantly through acquisitions in the past and expect to continue to review acquisition opportunities as a means of increasing the size and scope of our business. Our growth, coupled with the rapid evolution of our markets, has placed, and will continue to place, significant strains on our administrative and operational resources and increased demands on our internal systems, procedures and controls. Our administrative infrastructure, systems, procedures and controls may not adequately support our operations. In addition, our management may not be able to achieve the rapid, effective execution of the product and business initiatives necessary to successfully implement our operational and competitive strategy. If we are unable to manage growth effectively, our operating results will likely suffer which may, in turn, adversely affect our business.
If we lose the services of our executive officers or other key employees or if we are not able to attract or retain top employees, our business could be significantly harmed
Our performance is substantially dependent on the performance of our executive officers and key employees. We do not maintain “key person” life insurance policies on any of our employees. Our success is also highly dependent on our continuing

ability to identify, hire, train, retain and motivate highly qualified management, technical, sales and marketing personnel. In particular, the recruitment and retention of top research developers and experienced salespeople, particularly those with specialized knowledge, remains critical to our success.success, including providing consistent and uninterrupted service to our customers. Competition for such people is intense, substantial and continuous, and we may not be able to attract, integrate or retain highly qualified technical, sales or managerial personnel in the future. In addition, in our effort to attract and retain critical personnel, we may experience increased compensation costs that are not offset by either improved productivity or higher prices for our software products or services.
The In addition, the loss of the services of any of our executive officers or other key employees could significantly harm our business.business, operating results and financial condition.
Loss of key personnel could impair the integration of acquired businesses, lead to loss of customers and a decline in revenues, or otherwise could have an adverse effect on our operations
Our success as a combined business with any prior or future acquired businesses will depend, in part, upon our ability to retain key employees, especially during the integration phase of the businesses. It is possible that the integration process could result in current and prospective employees of ours and the acquired business to experience uncertainty about their future roles with us, which could have an adverse effect on our ability to retain or recruit key managers and other employees. If, despite our retention and recruiting efforts, key employees depart or fail to continue employment with us, the loss of their services and their experience and knowledge regarding our business or an acquired business could have an adverse effect on our future operating results and the successful ongoing operation of our businesses.
Our compensation structure may hinder our efforts to attract and retain vital employees
A portion of our total compensation program for our executive officers and key personnel includes the award of options to buy our Common Shares. If the market price of our Common Shares performs poorly, such performance may adversely affect our ability to retain or attract critical personnel. In addition, any changes made to our stock option policies, or to any other of our compensation practices, which are made necessary by governmental regulations or competitive pressures could adversely affect our ability to retain and motivate existing personnel and recruit new personnel. For example, any limit to total compensation which may be prescribed by the government or applicable regulatory authorities or any significant increases in personal income tax levels levied in countries where we have a significant operational presence may hurt our ability to attract or retain our executive officers or other employees whose efforts are vital to our success. Additionally, payments under our long-term incentive planplans (the details of which are described in Item 11 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K) are dependent to a significant extent upon the future performance of our Company both in absolute terms and in comparison to similarly situated companies. Any failure to achieve the targets set under our long-term incentive plan could significantly reduce or eliminate payments made under this plan, which may, in turn, materially and adversely affect our ability to retain the key personnel who are subject to this plan.
Unexpected events may materially harm our ability to align when we incur expenses with when we recognize revenues
We incur operating expenses based upon anticipated revenue trends. Since a high percentage of these expenses are relatively fixed, a delay in recognizing revenues from transactions related to these expenses (such a delay may be due to the factors described elsewhere in this risk factor section or it may be due to other factors) could cause significant variations in operating results from quarter to quarter and such a delay could materially reduce operating income. If these expenses are not subsequently matched by revenues, our business, financial condition, or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

We may fail to achieve our financial forecasts due to inaccurate sales forecasts or other factors
Our revenues and particularly our new software license revenues are difficult to forecast, and, as a result, our quarterly operating results can fluctuate substantially. We use a “pipeline” system, a common industry practice, to forecast sales and trends in our business. By reviewing the status of outstanding sales proposals to our customers and potential customers, we make an estimate as to when a customer will make a purchasing decision involving our software products. These estimates are aggregated periodically to make an estimate of our sales pipeline, which we use as a guide to plan our activities and make internal financial forecasts. Our sales pipeline is only an estimate and may be an unreliable predictor of actual sales activity, both in a particular quarter and over a longer period of time. Many factors may affect actual sales activity, such as weakened economic conditions, which may cause our customers and potential customers to delay, reduce or cancel IT related purchasing decisions and the tendency of some of our customers to wait until the end of a fiscal period in the hope of obtaining more favourablefavorable terms from us. If actual sales activity differs from our pipeline estimate, then we may have planned our activities and budgeted incorrectly and this may adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, for newly acquired companies, we have limited ability to immediately predict how their pipelines will convert into sales or revenues following the acquisition and their conversion rate post-acquisition may be quite different from their historical conversion rate.

Our revenue and operating cash flows could be adversely affected in the short term as we continue to see more customers transition to our cloud offerings

Should we continue to see more of our customers selecting our subscription pricing and managed service offerings, with payments made over time rather than a perpetual license with upfront fees, this could, in some cases, result in instances where reported revenue and cash flow could be lower in the short term when compared to our historical perpetual license model, as well as varying between periods depending on our customers' preference to license our products or subscribe to our subscription-based or managed service offerings. While we expect that over time the transition to a cloud and subscription model will help our business to generate revenue growth by attracting new users, keeping our user base current as subscriptions allow users to receive the latest product updates and thereby increase recurring revenue per user, there is no guarantee that our short term revenue and operating cash will not be adversely affected during any ongoing transition period.
The restructuring of our operations may adversely affect our business or our finances and we may incur restructuring charges in connection with such actions
We often undertake initiatives to restructure or streamline our operations, particularly during the period post acquisition. We may incur costs associated with implementing a restructuring initiative beyond the amount contemplated when we first developed the initiative and these increased costs may be substantial. As well,Additionally, such costs would adversely impact our results of operations for the periods in which those adjustments are made. We will continue to evaluate our operations, and may propose future restructuring actions as a result of changes in the marketplace, including the exit from less profitable operations or the decision to terminate products or services which are not valued by our customers. Any failure to successfully execute these initiatives on a timely basis may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could materially affect our financial results
Our Consolidated Financial Statements are presented in U.S. dollars. In general, the functional currency of our subsidiaries is the local currency. For each subsidiary, assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S dollars at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet dates and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates prevailing during the month of the transaction. Therefore, increases or decreases in the value of the U.S. dollar against other major currencies affect our net operating revenues, operating income and the value of balance sheet items denominated in foreign currencies. In addition, unexpected and dramatic devaluations of currencies in developing, as well as developed, markets could negatively affect our revenues from, and the value of the assets located in, those markets.  Transactional foreign currency gains (losses) included in the Consolidated Statements of Income under the line item “Other income (expense) net” for Fiscal 2016,2019, Fiscal 20152018 and Fiscal 20142017 were $(1.9)$(4.3) million, $(31.0)$4.8 million, and $4.0$3.1 million, respectively. While we use derivative financial instruments to attempt to reduce our net exposure to currency exchange rate fluctuations, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, particularly the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against major currencies or the currencies of large developing countries, could continue to materially affect our financial results. These risks and their potential impacts may be exacerbated by Brexit.Brexit and any policy changes, including those resulting from trade and tariff disputes. See “-The vote by the United Kingdom to leave the European Union (EU) could adversely affect us.”
Our international operations expose us to business, political and economic risks that could cause our operating results to suffer
We intend to continue to make efforts to increase our international operations and anticipate that international sales will continue to account for a significant portion of our revenues. These international operations are subject to certain risks and costs, including the difficulty and expense of administering business and compliance abroad, differences in business practices, compliance with domestic and foreign laws (including without limitation domestic and international import and export laws and regulations)regulations and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, including potential violations by acts of agents or other intermediaries), costs related to localizing products for foreign markets, and costs related to translating and distributing software products in a timely manner.manner, costs related to increased financial accounting and reporting burdens and complexities, longer sales and collection cycles for accounts receivables, failure of laws to protect our intellectual property rights adequately, local competition, and economic or political instability and uncertainties, including inflation, recession, interest rate fluctuations and actual or anticipated military or geopolitical conflicts. International operations also tend to be subject to a longer sales and collection cycle. In addition, regulatory limitations regarding the repatriation of earnings may adversely affect the transfer of cash earned from foreign operations. Significant international sales may also expose us to greater risk from political and

economic instability, unexpected changes in Canadian, United States or other governmental policies concerning import and export of goods and technology, regulatory requirements, tariffs and other trade barriers. Additionally, international earnings may be subject to taxation by more than one jurisdiction, which may materially adversely affect our effective tax rate. Also, international expansion may be difficult, time consuming, and costly. These risks and their potential impacts may be exacerbated by Brexit. See “-The vote by the United Kingdom to leave the EU could adversely affect us.” As a result, if revenues from international operations do not offset the expenses of establishing and maintaining foreign operations, our business, operating results and financial condition will suffer.

The vote by the United Kingdom to leave the EUEuropean Union (EU) could adversely affect us
The recentJune 2016 United Kingdom referendum on its membership in the EU resulted in a majority of United Kingdom voters voting to exit the EU (Brexit). We have operations in the United Kingdom and the EU, and as a result, we face risks associated with the potential uncertainty and disruptions that may follow Brexit, including with respect to volatility in exchange rates and interest rates and potential material changes to the regulatory regime applicable to our operations in the United Kingdom. Brexit could adversely affect European or worldwide political, regulatory, economic or market conditions and could contribute to instability in global political institutions, regulatory agencies and financial markets. For example, depending on the terms of Brexit (or a so called "no deal" Brexit), the United Kingdom could also lose access to the single EU market and to the global trade deals negotiated by the EU on behalf of its members. Disruptions and uncertainty caused by Brexit may also cause our customers to closely monitor their costs and reduce their spending budget on our products and services. Any of these effectsContinued uncertainty as to the terms of Brexit and othersmay result in heightened near term economic volatility. While we have not experienced any material financial impact from Brexit on our business to date, we cannot anticipate or that may evolvepredict its future implications. Any impact from Brexit on our business and operations over time,the long term will depend, in part, on the outcome of tariff, tax treaties, trade, regulatory, and other negotiations the United Kingdom conducts (as well as the possibility of a "no deal" Brexit), and could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.
Our software products and services may contain defects that could harm our reputation, be costly to correct, delay revenues, and expose us to litigation
Our software products and services are highly complex and sophisticated and, from time to time, may contain design defects, software errors, hardware failures or other computer system failures that are difficult to detect and correct. Errors, defects and/or other failures may be found in new software products or services or improvements to existing products or services after delivery to our customers. If these defects, errors and/or other failures are discovered, we may not be able to successfully correct such errorsthem in a timely manner. In addition, despite the extensive tests we conduct on all our software products or services, we may not be able to fully simulate the environment in which our products or services will operate and, as a result, we may be unable to adequately detect the design defects or software or hardware errors which may become apparent only after the products are installed in an end-user's network, and after users have transitioned to our services. The occurrence of errors, anddefects and/or other failures in our software products or services could result in the delay or the denial of market acceptance of our products and alleviating such errors, anddefects and/or other failures may require us to make significant expenditure of our resources. Customers often use our services and solutions for critical business processes and as a result, any defect or disruption in our solutions, any data breaches or misappropriation of proprietary information, or any error in execution, including human error or intentional third-party activity such as denial of service attacks or hacking, may cause customers to reconsider renewing their contract with us. The errors in or failure of our software products and services could also result in us losing customer transaction documents and other customer files, causing significant customer dissatisfaction and possibly giving rise to claims for monetary damages. The harm to our reputation resulting from product and service errors, anddefects and/or other failures may be materially damaging.material. Since we regularly provide a warranty with our software products, the financial impact of fulfilling warranty obligations may be significant in the future. Our agreements with our strategic partners and end-users typically contain provisions designed to limit our exposure to claims. These agreements regularly contain terms such as the exclusion of all implied warranties and the limitation of the availability of consequential or incidental damages. However, such provisions may not effectively protect us against claims and the attendant liabilities and costs associated with such claims. Any claims for actual or alleged losses to our customers’ businesses may require us to spend significant time and money in litigation or arbitration or to pay significant settlements or damages. Defending a lawsuit, regardless of merit, can be costly and would divert management’s attention and resources. Although we maintain errors and omissions insurance coverage and comprehensive liability insurance coverage, such coverage may not be adequate to cover all such claims. Accordingly, any such claim could negatively affect our business, operating results or financial condition.
Our software products rely on the stability of infrastructure software that, if not stable, could negatively impact the effectiveness of our products, resulting in harm to our reputation and business
Our development of Internet and intranet applications dependdepends on the stability, functionality and scalability of the infrastructure software of the underlying intranet, such as the infrastructure software produced by Hewlett-Packard, Oracle,

Microsoft and others. If weaknesses in such infrastructure software exist, we may not be able to correct or compensate for such weaknesses. If we are unable to address weaknesses resulting from problems in the infrastructure software such that our software products do not meet customer needs or expectations, our reputation, and consequently, our business may be significantly harmed.
Risks associated with the evolving use of the Internet, including changing standards, competition, and regulation and associated compliance efforts, may adversely impact our business
The use of the Internet as a vehicle for electronic data interchange (EDI), and related services currently raises numerous issues, including reliability, data security, data integrity and rapidly evolving standards. New competitors, which may include media, software vendors and telecommunications companies, offer products and services that utilize the Internet in competition with our products and services and may be less expensive or process transactions and data faster and more efficiently. Internet-based commerce is subject to increasing regulation by Canadian, U.S. federal and state and foreign governments, including in

the areas of data privacy and breaches, and taxation. Laws and regulations relating to the solicitation, collection, processing or use of personal or consumer information could affect our customers’ ability to use and share data, potentially reducing demand for Internet-based solutions and restricting our ability to store, process, analyze and share data through the Internet. Although we believe that the Internet will continue to provide opportunities to expand the use of our products and services, we cannot ensure that our efforts to exploit these opportunities will be successful or that increased usage of the Internet for business integration products and services or increased competition, and regulation will not adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Business disruptions, including those related to data security breaches, may adversely affect our operations
Our business and operations are highly automated and a disruption or failure of our systems may delay our ability to complete sales and to provide services. Business disruptions can be caused by several factors, including natural disasters, terrorist attacks, power loss, telecommunicationtelecommunications and system failures, computer viruses, physical attacks and cyber-attacks. A major disaster or other catastrophic event that results in the destruction or disruption of any of our critical business or information technology systems, including our cloud services, could severely affect our ability to conduct normal business operations. We operate data centrescenters in various locations around the world and although we have redundancy capability built into our disaster recovery plan, we cannot ensure that our systems and data centrescenters will remain fully operational during and immediately after a disaster or disruption. We also rely on third parties that provide critical services in our operations and despite our diligence around their disaster recovery processes, we cannot provide assurances as to whether these third party service providers can maintain operations during a disaster or disruption. Global climate change may furthermore aggravate natural disasters that effect our business operations, thereby compelling us to build additional resiliency in order to mitigate impact. Any business disruption could negatively affect our business, operating results or financial condition.
In addition, if data security is compromised, this could materially and adversely affect our operating results given that we have customers that use our systems to store and exchange large volumes of proprietary and confidential information and the security and reliability of our services are significant to these customers. We have experienced attempts by third parties to identify and exploit product and service vulnerabilities, penetrate or bypass our security measures, and gain unauthorized access to our or our customers' or service providers' cloud offerings and other products and systems. If our products or systems, or the products or systems of third-party service providers on whom we rely, are attacked or accessed by unauthorized parties, it could lead to major disruption or denial of service and access to or loss, modification or theft of our and our customers' data which may involve us having to spend material resources on correcting the breach and indemnifying the relevant parties and/or on litigation, regulatory investigations, regulatory proceedings, increased insurance premiums, lost revenues, penalties, fines and/or other potential liabilities, which could have adverse effects on our reputation, business, operating results and financial condition.
Unauthorized disclosures and breaches of data security data may adversely affect our operations
Most of the jurisdictions in which we operate have laws and regulations relating to data privacy, security and protection of information. We have certain measures to protect our information systems against unauthorized access and disclosure of personal information and of our confidential information and confidential information belonging to our customers. We have policies and procedures in place dealing with data security and records retention. However, there is no assurance that the security measures we have put in place will be effective in every case. Breaches in security could result in a negative impact for us and for our customers, adversely affecting our and our customers' businesses, assets, revenues, brands and reputations and resulting in penalties, fines, litigation, regulatory proceedings, andregulatory investigations, increase insurance premiums, remediation efforts, indemnification expenditures, lost revenues and/or other potential liabilities, in each case depending on the nature of the information disclosed. Security breaches could also affect our relations with our customers, injure our reputation and harm our ability to keep existing customers and to attract new customers. Some jurisdictions have enacted laws requiring

companies to notify individuals of data security breaches involving certain types of personal data, and in some cases our agreements with certain customers require us to notify them in the event of a data security incident. Such mandatory disclosures could lead to negative publicity and may cause our current and prospective customers to lose confidence in the effectiveness of our data security measures. These circumstances could also result in adverse impact on the market price of our Common Shares. These risks to our business may increase as we expand the number of web-based and cloud-based products and services we offer and as we increase the number of countries in which we operate.
Our revenues and operating results are likely to fluctuate, which could materially impact the market price of our Common Shares
We experience significant fluctuations in revenues and operating results caused by many factors, including:
Changes in the demand for our software products and services and for the products and services of our competitors;
The introduction or enhancement of software products and services by us and by our competitors;
Market acceptance of our software products, enhancements and/or services;
Delays in the introduction of software products, enhancements and/or services by us or by our competitors;
Customer order deferrals in anticipation of upgrades and new software products;
Changes in the lengths of sales cycles;
Changes in our pricing policies or those of our competitors;
Delays in software product implementation with customers;
Change in the mix of distribution channels through which our software products are licensed;
Change in the mix of software products and services sold;

Change in the mix of international and North American revenues;
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates, and LIBORLondon Inter-Bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) and other applicable interest rates;rates (including the anticipated replacement of LIBOR as a benchmark rate);
Acquisitions and the integration of acquired businesses;
Restructuring charges taken in connection with any completed acquisition or otherwise;
Outcome and impact of tax audits and other contingencies;
Investor perception of our Company;
Changes in earnings estimates by securities analysts and our ability to meet those estimates;
Changes in laws and regulations affecting our business, including data privacy and cybersecurity laws and regulations;
Changes in general economic and business conditions; and
Changes in general political developments, such as the impact of Brexit, changes to international trade policies and policies taken to stimulate or to preserve national economies.
A general weakening of the global economy or a continued weakening of the economy in a particular region or economic or business uncertainty could result in the cancellation of or delay in customer purchases. A cancellation or deferral of even a small number of license sales or services or delays in the implementation of our software products could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. As a result of the timing of software product and service introductions and the rapid evolution of our business as well as of the markets we serve, we cannot predict whether patterns or trends experienced in the past will continue. For these reasons, you should not rely upon period-to-period comparisons of our financial results to forecast future performance. Our revenues and operating results may vary significantly and this possible variance could materially reduce the market price of our Common Shares.
Our sales to government clients expose us to business volatility and risks, including government budgeting cycles and appropriations, early termination, audits, investigations, sanctions and penalties
We derive revenues from contracts with the U.S. and Canadian governments,federal, state, provincial and local governments, and other foreign governments and their respective agencies, which may terminate most of these contracts at any time, without cause. There is increased pressure on governments and their agencies, both domestically and internationally, to reduce spending. Further, our U.S. federal government contracts are subject to the approval of appropriations made by the U.S. Congress to fund the expenditures under these contracts. Similarly, our contracts with U.S. state and local governments, Canadian federal, provincial and local governmentgovernments and other foreign governments and their agencies are generally subject to government funding authorizations. Additionally, government contracts are generally subject to audits and investigations which could result in various civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including termination of contracts, refund of a portion of fees received, forfeiture of profits, suspension of payments, fines and suspensions or debarment from future government business.

Changes in the market price of our Common Shares and credit ratings of our outstanding debt securities could lead to losses for shareholders and debt holders
The market price of our Common Shares and credit ratings of our outstanding debt securities are subject to fluctuations. Such fluctuations in market price or credit ratings may continue in response to: (i) quarterly and annual variations in operating results; (ii) announcements of technological innovations or new products or services that are relevant to our industry; (iii) changes in financial estimates by securities analysts; (iv) changes to the ratings or outlook of our outstanding debt securities by rating agenciesagencies; or (v) other events or factors. In addition, financial markets experience significant price and volume fluctuations that particularly affect the market prices of equity securities of many technology companies. These fluctuations have often resulted from the failure of such companies to meet market expectations in a particular quarter, and thus such fluctuations may or may not be related to the underlying operating performance of such companies. Broad market fluctuations or any failure of our operating results in a particular quarter to meet market expectations may adversely affect the market price of our Common Shares or the credit ratings of our outstanding debt securities. Occasionally, periods of volatility in the market price of a company's securities may lead to the institution of securities class action litigation against a company. If we are subject to such volatility in our stock price, we may be the target of such securities litigation in the future. Such legal action could result in substantial costs to defend our interests and a diversion of management's attention and resources, each of which would have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.
We may become involved in litigation that may materially adversely affect us
From time to time in the ordinary course of our business, we may become involved in various legal proceedings, including commercial, product liability, employment, class action and other litigation and claims, as well as governmental and other regulatory investigations and proceedings. Such matters can be time-consuming, divert management's attention and resources and cause us to incur significant expenses. Furthermore, because litigation is inherently unpredictable, the results of any such actions may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial condition.

Our provision for income taxes and effective income tax rate may vary significantly and may adversely affect our results of operations and cash resources
Significant judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes. Various internal and external factors may have favorable or unfavorable effects on our future provision for income taxes, income taxes receivable, and our effective income tax rate. These factors include, but are not limited to, changes in tax laws, regulations and/or rates, results of audits by tax authorities, changing interpretations of existing tax laws or regulations, changes in estimates of prior years' items, the impact of transactions we complete, future levels of research and development spending, changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, transfer pricing adjustments, changes in the overall mix of income among the different jurisdictions in which we operate, and changes in overall levels of income before taxes. Changes in the tax laws of various jurisdictions in which we do business could result from the base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) project being undertaken by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The OECD, a coalition of member countries, has been developing recommendations for international tax rules to address different types of BEPS, including situations in which profits are shifted (or payments are made) from higher tax jurisdictions to lower tax jurisdictions. Adoption of these recommendations (or other changes in law or policy) by the countries in which we do business could adversely affect our provision for income taxes and our effective tax rate. Furthermore, new accounting pronouncements or new interpretations of existing accounting pronouncements (such as those that may be described in note 2 “Significant Accounting Policies” in our notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K), and/or any internal restructuring initiatives we may implement from time to time to streamline our operations, can have a material impact on our effective income tax rate. In July 2016, we implemented a reorganization of our subsidiaries worldwide with the view to continuing to enhance operational and administrative efficiencies through further consolidated ownership, management, and development of our intellectual property (IP) in Canada, continuing to reduce the number of entities in our group and working towards our objective of having a single operational legal entity in each jurisdiction. See note 23 "Subsequent Events" to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Tax examinations are often complex as tax authorities may disagree with the treatment of items reported by us and our
transfer pricing methodology based upon our limited risk distributor model, the result of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Although we believe our estimates are reasonable, the ultimate outcome with respect to the taxes we owe may differ from the amounts recorded in our financial statements, and this difference may materially affect our financial position and financial results in the period or periods for which such determination is made.
For more details of tax audits to which we are subject see notes 13 "Guarantees and Contingencies" and 14 "Income Taxes" to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the immediately following risk factor in this section.
As part of a tax examination by the United States Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), we have received a Notice of Proposed Adjustment (“NOPA”) in draft form proposing a material increase to our taxes arising from the reorganization in Fiscal 2010. Based on discussions with the IRS, we expect to receive an additional NOPA that will propose a material increase to our taxes arising in connection with our integration of Global 360 into the structure that resulted from our reorganization. An adverse outcome of these tax examinations could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.
As we have previously disclosed, the IRS is examining certain of our tax returns for our fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 (Fiscal 2010) through our fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 (Fiscal 2012), and in connection with those examinations is reviewing our internal reorganization in Fiscal 2010 to consolidate certain intellectual property ownership in Luxembourg and Canada and our integration of certain acquisitions into the resulting structure. We also previously disclosed that the examinations may lead to proposed adjustments to our taxes that may be material, individually or in the aggregate, and that we have not recorded any material accruals for any such potential adjustments in our Consolidated Financial Statements.
As part of these examinations, on July 17, 2015 we received from the IRS a NOPA in draft form proposing a one-time approximately $280 million increase to our U.S. federal taxes arising from the reorganization in Fiscal 2010 and proposing penalties equal to 20% of the additional taxes, plus interest at the applicable statutory rate (which will continue to accrue until the matter is resolved and may be substantial). A NOPA is an IRS position and does not impose an obligation to pay tax. The draft NOPA may be changed before the final NOPA is issued, including because the IRS reserved the right in the draft NOPA to increase the adjustment. Based on discussions with the IRS, we expect we will receive an additional NOPA proposing an approximately $80 million increase to our U.S. federal taxes for Fiscal 2012 arising from the integration of Global 360 into the structure that resulted from the reorganization, accompanied by proposed penalties and interest (although there can be no assurance that this will be the amount reflected in the NOPA when received, including because the IRS may assign a higher value to our intellectual property). Depending upon the outcome of these matters, additional state income taxes plus penalties and interest may be due. We currently estimate that, as of June 30, 2016, adjustments under the draft NOPA in its present form and the anticipated additional NOPA could result in an aggregate liability of approximately $550 million, inclusive of U.S.

federal and state taxes, penalties and interest.
We strongly disagree with the IRS’ position and intend to vigorously contest the proposed adjustments to our taxable income. We are examining various alternatives available to taxpayers to contest the proposed adjustments. Any such alternatives could involve a lengthy process and result in the incurrence of significant expenses. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have not recorded any material accruals in respect of these examinations in our Consolidated Financial Statements. An adverse outcome of these tax examinations could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.
For more details of tax audits to which we are subject see notes 13 "Guarantees and Contingencies" and 14 "Income Taxes" to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The declaration, payment and amount of dividends will be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on a number of factors
We have adopted a policy to declare non-cumulative quarterly dividends on our Common Shares. The declaration, payment and amount of any dividends will be made pursuant to our dividend policy and is subject to final determination each quarter by our Board of Directors in its discretion based on a number of factors that it deems relevant, including our financial position, results of operations, available cash resources, cash requirements and alternative uses of cash that our Board of Directors may conclude would be in the best interest of our shareholders. Our dividend payments are subject to relevant contractual limitations, including those in our existing credit agreements and to solvency conditions established by the Canada Business Corporations Act (CBCA), the statute under which we are incorporated. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that any future dividends will be equal or similar in amount to any dividends previously paid or that our Board of Directors will not decide to reduce, suspend or discontinue the payment of dividends at any time in the future.
Our operating results could be adversely affected by any weakening of economic conditions
Our overall performance depends in part on worldwide economic conditions. Certain economies have experienced periods of downturn as a result of a multitude of factors, including, but not limited to, turmoil in the credit and financial markets, concerns regarding the stability and viability of major financial institutions, declines in gross domestic product, increases in unemployment and volatility in commodity prices and worldwide stock markets, and excessive government debt. Recently, Brexit and its impact on the United Kingdom and the EU have raised additional concerns regarding economic uncertainties. The severity and length of time that a downturn in economic and financial market conditions may persist, as well as the timing, strength and sustainability of any recovery, are unknown and are beyond our control. Moreover, any instability in the global economy affects countries in different ways, at different times and with varying severity, which makes the impact to our business complex and unpredictable. During such downturns, many customers may delay or reduce technology purchases. Contract negotiations may become more protracted or conditions could result in reductions in the licensing of our software products and the sale of cloud and other services, longer sales cycles, pressure on our margins, difficulties in collection of accounts receivable or delayed payments, increased default risks associated with our accounts receivables, slower adoption of new technologies and increased price competition. In addition, deterioration of the global credit markets could adversely impact our ability to complete licensing transactions and services transactions, including maintenance and support renewals. Any of these events, as well as a general weakening of, or declining corporate confidence in, the global economy, or a curtailment in government or corporate spending could delay or decrease our revenues and therefore have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
Stress in the global financial system may adversely affect our finances and operations in ways that may be hard to predict or to defend against
Financial developments seemingly unrelated to us or to our industry may adversely affect us over the course of time. For example, material increases in LIBOR or other applicable interest rate benchmarks may increase the debt payment costs for our credit facilities. Credit contraction in financial markets may hurt our ability to access credit in the event that we identify an acquisition opportunity or require significant access to credit for other reasons. Similarly, volatility in the market price of our Common Shares due to seemingly unrelated financial developments could hurt our ability to raise capital for the financing of acquisitions or other reasons. Potential price inflation caused by an excess of liquidity in countries where we conduct business may increase the cost we incur to provide our solutions and may reduce profit margins on agreements that govern the licensing of our software products and/or the sale of our services to customers over a multi-year period. A reduction in credit, combined with reduced economic activity, may adversely affect businesses and industries that collectively constitute a significant portion of our customer base such as the public sector. As a result, these customers may need to reduce their licensing of our software products or their purchases of our services, or we may experience greater difficulty in receiving payment for the licenses and services that these customers purchase from us. Any of these events, or any other events caused by turmoil in world financial markets, may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.

Our indebtedness could limit our operations and opportunities.
Our debt service obligations could have an adverse effect on our earnings and cash flows for as long as the indebtedness is outstanding, which could reduce the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes.
As of June 30, 2016,2019, our credit facilities consisted of a $800 million$1.0 billion term loan facility (Term Loan B) and a $300$450 million committed revolving credit facility (the Revolver). Borrowings under Term Loan B and the Revolver, if any, are or will be secured by a first charge over substantially all of our assets.
Repayments made under Term Loan B are equal to 0.25% of the original principal amount in equal quarterly installments for the life of Term Loan B, with the remainder due at maturity. The terms of Term Loan B and the Revolver include customary restrictive covenants that impose operating and financial restrictions on us, including restrictions on our ability to take actions that could be in our best interests. These restrictive covenants include certain limitations on our ability to make investments, loans and acquisitions, incur additional debt, incur liens and encumbrances, consolidate, amalgamate or merge with any other person, dispose of assets, make certain restricted payments, including a limit on dividends on equity securities or payments to redeem, repurchase or retire equity securities or other indebtedness, engage in transactions with affiliates, materially alter the business we conduct, and enter into certain restrictive agreements. Term Loan B and the Revolver includes a financial covenant relating to a maximum consolidated net leverage ratio, which could restrict our operations, particularly our ability to respond to changes in our business or to take specified actions. Our failure to comply with any of the covenants that are included in Term Loan B and the Revolver could result in a default under the terms thereof, which could permit the lenders thereunder to declare all or part of any outstanding borrowings to be immediately due and payable.
As of June 30, 2016,2019, we also have $800 million in aggregate principal amount of our 5.625% senior unsecured notes due 2023 (Senior Notes 2023) and $600$850 million in aggregate principal amount of our 5.875% senior unsecured notes due 2026 (Senior Notes 2026, and with the Senior Notes 2023, the Senior Notes) outstanding, both respectively issued in private placements to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act and to certain persons in offshore transactions pursuant to Regulation S under the Securities Act. Our failure to comply with any of the covenants that are included in the indentures governing the Senior Notes could result in a default under the terms thereof, which could result in all or a portion of the Senior Notes to be immediately due and payable.
Our Term Loan B and Revolver have variable rates of interest, some of which use LIBOR as a benchmark. There is currently uncertainty regarding the continued use and reliability of LIBOR. As a result, any financial instruments or agreements using LIBOR as a benchmark interest rate may be adversely affected. This uncertainty about the future of LIBOR and the potential discontinuance of LIBOR may exacerbate the risk to us of increased interest rates, and our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
The risks discussed above would be increased to the extent that we engage in acquisitions that involve the incurrence of material additional debt, or the acquisition of businesses with material debt, and such incurrences or acquisitions could potentially negatively impact the ratings or outlook of the rating agencies on our outstanding debt securities.securities and the market price of our common shares.
For more details see note 10 "Long-Term Debt" to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We may become involved in litigation that may materially adversely affect us
From time to time in the ordinary course of our business, we may become involved in various legal proceedings, including commercial, product liability, employment, class action and other litigation and claims, as well as governmental and other regulatory investigations and proceedings. Such matters can be time-consuming, divert management's attention and resources and cause us to incur significant expenses. Furthermore, because litigation is inherently unpredictable, the results of any such actions may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial condition.
Our provision for income taxes and effective income tax rate may vary significantly and may adversely affect our results of operations and cash resources
Significant judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes. Various internal and external factors may have favorable or unfavorable effects on our future provision for income taxes, income taxes receivable, and our effective income tax rate. These factors include, but are not limited to, changes in tax laws, regulations and/or rates, results of audits by tax authorities, changing interpretations of existing tax laws or regulations, changes in estimates of prior years' items, the impact of transactions we complete, future levels of research and development spending, changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, transfer pricing adjustments, changes in the overall mix of income among the different jurisdictions in which we operate, and changes in overall levels of income before taxes. Furthermore, new accounting pronouncements or new interpretations of existing accounting pronouncements, and/or any internal restructuring initiatives we may implement from time to time to streamline our operations, can have a material impact on our effective income tax rate.
Tax examinations are often complex as tax authorities may disagree with the treatment of items reported by us and our
transfer pricing methodology based upon our limited risk distributor model, the result of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Although we believe our estimates are reasonable, the ultimate outcome with respect to the taxes we owe may differ from the amounts recorded in our financial statements, and this difference may materially affect our financial position and financial results in the period or periods for which such determination is made.
For more details of tax audits to which we are subject, see notes 13 "Guarantees and Contingencies" and 14 "Income Taxes", respectively, to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
As part of a tax examination by the United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS), we have received a Notice of Proposed Adjustment (NOPA) proposing a material increase to our taxes arising from the reorganization in Fiscal 2010 and an additional NOPA proposing a material increase to our taxes arising in connection with our integration of Global 360 in Fiscal 2012 into the structure that resulted from our reorganization. An adverse outcome of these tax examinations could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.
As we have previously disclosed, the United States IRS is examining certain of our tax returns for our fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 (Fiscal 2010) through our fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 (Fiscal 2012), and in connection with those examinations is reviewing our internal reorganization in Fiscal 2010 to consolidate certain intellectual property ownership in Luxembourg and Canada and our integration of certain acquisitions into the resulting structure. We also previously disclosed that the examinations may lead to proposed adjustments to our taxes that may be material, individually or in the aggregate, and that we have not recorded any material accruals for any such potential adjustments in our Consolidated Financial Statements.
We previously disclosed that, as part of these examinations, on July 17, 2015 we received from the IRS an initial Notice of Proposed Adjustment (NOPA) in draft form, that, as revised by the IRS on July 11, 2018 proposes a one-time approximately $335 million increase to our U.S. federal taxes arising from the reorganization in Fiscal 2010 (the 2010 NOPA), plus penalties equal to 20% of the additional proposed taxes for Fiscal 2010, and interest at the applicable statutory rate published by the IRS.
On July 11, 2018, we also received, consistent with previously disclosed expectations, a draft NOPA proposing a one-time approximately $80 million increase to our U.S. federal taxes for Fiscal 2012 (the 2012 NOPA). arising from the integration of Global 360 Holding Corp. into the structure that resulted from the internal reorganization in Fiscal 2010, plus penalties equal to 40% of the additional proposed taxes for Fiscal 2012, and interest.
On January 7, 2019, we received from the IRS official notification of proposed adjustments to our taxable income for Fiscal 2010 and Fiscal 2012, together with the 2010 NOPA and 2012 NOPA in final form. In each case, such documentation was as expected and on substantially the same terms as provided for in the previously disclosed respective draft NOPAs, with the exception of an additional proposed penalty as part of the 2012 NOPA.
A NOPA is an IRS position and does not impose an obligation to pay tax. We continue to strongly disagree with the IRS’ positions within the NOPAs and we are vigorously contesting the proposed adjustments to our taxable income, along with any proposed penalties and interest.
As of our receipt of the final 2010 NOPA and 2012 NOPA, our estimated potential aggregate liability, as proposed by the IRS, including additional state income taxes plus penalties and interest that may be due, to be approximately $770 million,

comprised of approximately $455 million in U.S. federal and state taxes, approximately $130 million of penalties, and approximately $185 million of interest. Interest will continue to accrue at the applicable statutory rates until the matter is resolved and may be substantial.
As previously disclosed and noted above, we strongly disagree with the IRS’ position and we are vigorously contesting the proposed adjustments to our taxable income, along with the proposed penalties and interest. We are examining various alternatives available to taxpayers to contest the proposed adjustments, including through IRS Appeals and U.S. Federal court. Any such alternatives could involve a lengthy process and result in the incurrence of significant expenses. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have not recorded any material accruals in respect of these examinations in our Consolidated Financial Statements. An adverse outcome of these tax examinations could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.
For details of this and other tax audits to which we are subject, see notes 13 "Guarantees and Contingencies" and 14 "Income Taxes" to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The declaration, payment and amount of dividends will be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on a number of factors
We have adopted a policy to declare non-cumulative quarterly dividends on our Common Shares. The declaration, payment and amount of any dividends will be made pursuant to our dividend policy and is subject to final determination each quarter by our Board of Directors in its discretion based on a number of factors that it deems relevant, including our financial position, results of operations, available cash resources, cash requirements and alternative uses of cash that our Board of Directors may conclude would be in the best interest of our shareholders. Our dividend payments are subject to relevant contractual limitations, including those in our existing credit agreements and to solvency conditions established by the Canada Business Corporations Act (CBCA), the statute under which we are incorporated. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that any future dividends will be equal or similar in amount to any dividends previously paid or that our Board of Directors will not decide to reduce, suspend or discontinue the payment of dividends at any time in the future.
Our operating results could be adversely affected by any weakening of economic conditions
Our overall performance depends in part on worldwide economic conditions. Certain economies have experienced periods of downturn as a result of a multitude of factors, including, but not limited to, turmoil in the credit and financial markets, concerns regarding the stability and viability of major financial institutions, declines in gross domestic product, increases in unemployment, volatility in commodity prices and worldwide stock markets, excessive government debt and disruptions to global trade or tariffs. The severity and length of time that a downturn in economic and financial market conditions may persist, as well as the timing, strength and sustainability of any recovery, are unknown and are beyond our control. Recently, Brexit and its impact on the United Kingdom and the EU, as well as any policy changes resulting from trade and tariff disputes, have raised additional concerns regarding economic uncertainties. Moreover, any instability in the global economy affects countries in different ways, at different times and with varying severity, which makes the impact to our business complex and unpredictable. During such downturns, many customers may delay or reduce technology purchases. Contract negotiations may become more protracted or conditions could result in reductions in the licensing of our software products and the sale of cloud and other services, longer sales cycles, pressure on our margins, difficulties in collection of accounts receivable or delayed payments, increased default risks associated with our accounts receivables, slower adoption of new technologies and increased price competition. In addition, deterioration of the global credit markets could adversely impact our ability to complete licensing transactions and services transactions, including maintenance and support renewals. Any of these events, as well as a general weakening of, or declining corporate confidence in, the global economy, or a curtailment in government or corporate spending could delay or decrease our revenues and therefore have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
Risks associated with data privacy issues, including evolving laws and regulations and associated compliance efforts, may adversely impact our business
Our business depends on the processing of personal data, including data transfer between our affiliated entities, to and from our business partners and customers, and with third-party service providers. The laws and regulations relating to personal data constantly evolve, as federal, state and foreign governments continue to adopt new measures addressing data privacy and processing (including collection, storage, transfer, disposal and use) of personal data. Moreover, the interpretation and application of many existing or recently enacted privacy and data protection laws and regulations in the European Union, the U.S. and elsewhere are uncertain and fluid, and it is possible that such laws and regulations may be interpreted or applied in a manner that is inconsistent with our existing data management practices or the features of our products and services. Any such new laws or regulations, any changes to existing laws and regulations and any such interpretation or application may affect demand for our products and services, impact our ability to effectively transfer data across borders in support of our business

operations, or increase the cost of providing our products and services. Additionally, any actual or perceived breach of such laws or regulations may subject us to claims and may lead to administrative, civil, or criminal liability, as well as reputational harm to our Company and its employees. We could also be required to fundamentally change our business activities and practices, or modify our products and services, which could have an adverse effect on our business.
In the U.S., various laws and regulations apply to the collection, processing, transfer, disposal, unauthorized disclosure and security of personal data. For example, data protection laws passed by most states within the U.S. require notification to users when there is a security breach for personal data. Additionally, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and many state attorneys general are interpreting federal and state consumer protection laws as imposing standards for the online collection, use, transfer and security of data. The U.S. Congress and state legislatures, along with federal regulatory authorities have recently increased their attention to matters concerning personal data, and this may result in new legislation which could increase the cost of compliance. In addition to government regulation, privacy advocacy and industry groups may propose new and different self-regulatory standards that either legally or contractually apply to us or our clients.
Some of our operations are subject to the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which took effect from May 25, 2018. The GDPR introduces a number of new obligations for subject companies and we will need to continue dedicating financial resources and management time to GDPR compliance. The GDPR enhances the obligations placed on companies that control or process personal data including, for example, expanded disclosures about how personal data is to be used, new mechanisms for obtaining consent from data subjects, new controls for data subjects with respect to their personal data (including by enabling them to exercise rights to erasure and data portability), limitations on retention of personal data and mandatory data breach notifications. Additionally, the GDPR places companies under new obligations relating to data transfers and the security of the personal data they process. The GDPR provides that supervisory authorities in the European Union may impose administrative fines for certain infringements of the GDPR of up to EUR 20,000,000 or 4% of an undertaking’s total, worldwide, annual turnover of the preceding financial year, whichever is higher. Individuals who have suffered damage as a result of a subject company’s non-compliance with the GDPR also have the right to seek compensation from such company. Given the breadth of the GDPR, compliance with its requirements is likely to continue to require significant expenditure of resources on an ongoing basis, and there can be no assurance that the measures we have taken for the purposes of compliance will be successful in preventing breach of the GDPR. Given the potential fines, liabilities and damage to our reputation in the event of an actual or perceived breach of the GDPR, such a breach may have an adverse effect on our business and operations.
Outside of the U.S. and the European Union, many jurisdictions have adopted or are adopting new data privacy laws that may impose further onerous compliance requirements, such as data localization, which prohibits companies from storing and/or processing outside the jurisdiction data relating to resident individuals. The proliferation of such laws within the jurisdictions in which we operate may result in conflicting and contradictory requirements, particularly in relation to evolving technologies such as cloud computing. Any failure to successfully navigate the changing regulatory landscape could result in legal liability or impairment to our reputation in the marketplace, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Privacy-related claims or lawsuits initiated by governmental bodies, customers or other third parties, whether meritorious or not, could be time consuming, result in costly regulatory proceedings, litigation, penalties and fines, or require us to change our business practices, sometimes in expensive ways, or other potential liabilities. Unfavorable publicity regarding our privacy practices could injure our reputation, harm our ability to keep existing customers or attract new customers or otherwise adversely affect our business, assets, revenue, brands and reputation.
Certain of our products may be perceived as, or determined by the courts to be, a violation of privacy rights and related laws. Any such perception or determination could adversely affect our revenues and results of operations.
Because of the nature of certain of our products, including those relating to digital investigations, potential customers and purchasers of our products or the public in general may perceive that use of these products may result in violations of their individual privacy rights. In addition, certain courts or regulatory authorities could determine that the use of our software solutions or other products is a violation of privacy laws, particularly in jurisdictions outside of the United States. Any such determination or perception by potential customers, the general public, government entities or the judicial system could harm our reputation and adversely affect our revenues and results of operations.

Stress in the global financial system may adversely affect our finances and operations in ways that may be hard to predict or to defend against
Financial developments seemingly unrelated to us or to our industry may adversely affect us over the course of time. For example, material increases in LIBOR or other applicable interest rate benchmarks may increase the debt payment costs for our credit facilities. There is currently uncertainty regarding the continued use and reliability of LIBOR. As a result, any financial instruments or agreements using LIBOR as a benchmark interest rate may be adversely affected. This uncertainty about the future of LIBOR and the potential discontinuance of LIBOR may exacerbate the risk to us of increased interest rates, and our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Credit contraction in financial markets may hurt our ability to access credit in the event that we identify an acquisition opportunity or require significant access to credit for other reasons. Similarly, volatility in the market price of our Common Shares due to seemingly unrelated financial developments could hurt our ability to raise capital for the financing of acquisitions or other reasons. Potential price inflation caused by an excess of liquidity in countries where we conduct business may increase the cost we incur to provide our solutions and may reduce profit margins on agreements that govern the licensing of our software products and/or the sale of our services to customers over a multi-year period. A reduction in credit, combined with reduced economic activity, may adversely affect businesses and industries that collectively constitute a significant portion of our customer base such as the public sector. As a result, these customers may need to reduce their licensing of our software products or their purchases of our services, or we may experience greater difficulty in receiving payment for the licenses and services that these customers purchase from us. Any of these events, or any other events caused by turmoil in world financial markets, may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.
Item 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2.    Properties
Our properties consist of owned and leased office facilities for sales, support, research and development, consulting and administrative personnel, totaling approximately 336,000 square feet of owned facilities and approximately 1,695,0002.4 million square feet of leased facilities.
Owned Facilities
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Our headquarters is located in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, and it consists of approximately 232,000 square feet. The land upon which the buildings stand is leased from the University of Waterloo for a period of 49 years beginning in December 2005, with an option to renew for an additional term of 49 years. The option to renew is exercisable by us upon providing written notice to the University of Waterloo not earlier than the 40th anniversary and not later than the 45th anniversary of the lease commencement date.
Brook Park, Ohio, United States
As part of our acquisition of GXS we acquiredWe also own a building, along with its land, located in Brook Park, Ohio, that consists of approximately 104,000 square feet. This building is used primarily as a data center.

Leased Facilities
We lease approximately 1,695,000The following table sets forth the location and approximate square feet both domestically and internationally. Our significantfootage of our leased facilities:
Square Footage
Americas (1)
1,143,000
EMEA (2)
582,000
Asia Pacific (3)
705,000
Total2,430,000
(1)Americas consists of countries in North, Central and South America.
(2)EMEA primarily consists of countries in Europe, the Middle East and Africa.
(3)Asia Pacific primarily consists of the countries Japan, Australia, China, Korea, Philippines, Singapore and New Zealand.


Included in the total approximate square footage of leased facilities include the following facilities:
Hyderabad facility, located in India, totalingis approximately 152,000 square feet;
Grasbrunn facility, located in Germany, totaling approximately 123,000279,000 square feet of office and storage;
Makati City facility, located in Manila, Philippines, totally approximately 117,000 square feet;
Richmond Hill facility, located in Ontario, Canada, totaling approximately 101,000 square feet;
Gaithersburg facility, located in Maryland, United States, totaling approximately 84,000 square feet;
Alpharetta facility, located in Georgia, United States, totaling approximately 54,000 square feet;
Reading facility, located in Reading, UK, totaling approximately 53,000 square feet; and
Tinton Falls facility, located in New Jersey, United States, totaling approximately 45,000 square feet;
Due to restructuring and merger integration initiatives, we have vacated approximately 158,000 square feet of our leased properties. The vacated space which has either been sublet or is being actively marketed for sublease or disposition.
In addition we also maintain a customer briefing centre and management office in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Item 3.    Legal Proceedings
In the normal course of business, we are subject to various legal claims, as well as potential legal claims. While the results of litigation and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe that the final outcome of these matters will not have a materially adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations or financial conditions.
For more information regarding litigation and the status of certain regulatory and tax proceedings, please refer to Part I, Item 1A "Risk Factors" and to note 13 “Guarantees and Contingencies” to our Consolidated Financial Statements, which are set forth in Part II,IV, under Item 815 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 4.    Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.

PART
Part II
Item 5.Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Our Common Shares have traded on the NASDAQ stock market since 1996 under the symbol “OTEX” and our Common Shares have traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) since 1998, first under the symbol “OTC”.
The following table sets forth"OTC", and since 2017, trades under the high and low sales prices for our Common Shares, as reported by the TSX and NASDAQ, respectively, for the periods indicated below.
 
NASDAQ
(in USD)
TSX
(in CAD)
 HighLowHighLow
Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016:    
Fourth Quarter$61.97$50.96$79.16$65.39
Third Quarter$52.57$41.93$69.69$57.93
Second Quarter$49.66$42.99$69.07$56.44
First Quarter$47.15$36.65$62.20$47.68
     
Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015:    
Fourth Quarter$58.43$39.93$71.66$49.46
Third Quarter$61.74$52.38$76.71$64.50
Second Quarter$60.44$51.00$69.39$57.29
First Quarter$58.71$46.85$64.72$50.10
symbol “OTEX”.
On July 8, 2016,June 30, 2019, the closing price of our Common Shares on the NASDAQ was $58.93$41.20 per share, and on the TSX was Canadian $76.75$54.04 per share.
As at July 8, 2016,June 30, 2019, we had 353346 shareholders of record holding our Common Shares of which 305294 were U.S. shareholders.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
None.
Dividend Policy
Pursuant to a policy adopted by our Board of Directors in April 2013 to pay non-cumulative quarterly dividends, we paid our first quarterly cash dividend in June 2013. We currently expect to continue paying comparable cash dividends on a quarterly basis. However, future declarations of dividends are subject to the final determination of our Board of Directors, in its discretion, based on a number of factors that it deems relevant, including our financial position, results of operations, available cash resources, cash requirements and alternative uses of cash that our Board of Directors may conclude would be in the best interest of our shareholders. Our dividend payments are subject to relevant contractual limitations, including those in our existing credit agreements and to solvency conditions established under the CBCA,Canada Business Corporations Act (CBCA), the statute under which we are incorporated. We have historically declared dividends in U.S. dollars, but registered shareholders can elect to receive dividends in U.S. dollars or Canadian dollars by contacting the Company's transfer agent.
In Fiscal 2016, our Board of Directors declared the following dividends:
Declaration Date Dividend per Share Record Date Total amount (in thousands of U.S. dollars) Payment Date
4/26/2016 $0.2300
 5/27/2016 $27,635
 6/17/2016
2/8/2016 $0.2000
 3/10/2016 $24,099
 3/31/2016
10/28/2015 $0.2000
 11/27/2015 $24,216
 12/18/2015
7/28/2015 $0.2000
 8/28/2015 $23,312
 9/18/2015

In Fiscal 2015, our Board of Directors declared the following dividends:
Declaration Date Dividend per Share Record Date Total amount (in thousands of U.S. dollars) Payment Date
4/27/2015 $0.2000
 5/29/2015 $24,455
 6/19/2015
1/26/2015 $0.1725
 2/26/2015 $21,075
 3/19/2015
10/22/2014 $0.1725
 11/21/2014 $21,054
 12/12/2014
7/30/2014 $0.1725
 8/29/2014 $21,045
 9/19/2014
Stock Purchases
No shares were repurchased during the three months ended June 30, 2016.
Normal Course Issuer Bid
On July 28, 2015, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $200 million of our Common Shares (Share Repurchase Plan). Common Shares may be repurchased from time to time in the open market, private purchases through forward, derivative, accelerated repurchase or automatic repurchase transactions or otherwise. Certain of our share repurchases may from time to time be effected through repurchase plans. The timing of any repurchases will depend on market conditions, our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and other factors. During Fiscal 2016 we repurchased and cancelled 1,476,248 Common Shares for approximately $65.5 million under the Share Repurchase Plan. On July 26, 2016, our Board of Directors authorized a new share repurchase plan for the repurchase of up to $200 million of our Common Shares, pursuant to a normal course issuer bid.2019.
Stock Performance Graph and Cumulative Total Return
The following graph compares for each of the five fiscal years ended June 30, 20162019, the yearly percentage change in the cumulative total shareholder return on our Common Shares with the cumulative total return on:
an index of companies in the software application industry (S&P North American Technology-Software Index);
the NASDAQ Composite Index; and
the S&P/TSX Composite Index.

Beginning in Fiscal 2016, we included the S&P North American Technology-Software Index to replace the previously used Morningstar Application-Software Index (Morningstar Index), an index of companies in the software application industry, which is exclusively maintained by Zack's Investment Research. The Morningstar Index will no longer be available to the Company upon changing service providers. For comparative purposes, the graph below includes both the Morningstar Index as well as the S&P North American Technology-Software Index.
The graph illustrates the cumulative return on a $100 investment in our Common Shares made on June 30, 2011,2014, as compared with the cumulative return on a $100 investment in the S&P North American Technology-Software Index, the Morningstar Index, the NASDAQ Composite Index and the S&P/TSX Composite Index (the Indices) made on the same day. Dividends declared on securities comprising the respective Indices and declared on our Common Shares are assumed to be reinvested. The performance of our Common Shares as set out in the graph is based upon historical data and is not indicative of, nor intended to forecast, future performance of our Common Shares. The graph lines merely connect measurement dates and do not reflect fluctuations between those dates.

graphr0.jpg
The chart below provides information with respect to the value of $100 invested on June 30, 20112014 in our Common Shares as well as in the other Indices, assuming dividend reinvestment when applicable:
June 30,
2011
June 30,
2012
June 30,
2013
June 30,
2014
June 30,
2015
June 30,
2016
June 30,
2014
June 30,
2015
June 30,
2016
June 30,
2017
June 30,
2018
June 30,
2019
Open Text Corporation$100.00$77.94$107.42$152.61$130.79$194.13$100.00$85.71$127.21$137.67$156.12$185.85
S&P North American Technology-Software Index$100.00$98.69$108.67$138.58$161.20$173.07$100.00$116.33$124.89$163.28$218.94$264.11
Morningstar Application - Software Index$100.00$96.36$114.35$139.18$154.82$155.66
NASDAQ Composite$100.00$106.99$125.83$165.05$188.87$185.70$100.00$114.44$112.51$144.35$178.42$192.30
S&P/TSX Composite$100.00$84.95$88.68$112.60$95.09$91.27$100.00$84.45$81.05$89.92$98.10$102.28
 
To the extent that this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been or will be specifically incorporated by reference into any filing by us under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, the foregoing “Stock Performance Graph and Cumulative Total Return” shall not be deemed to be “soliciting materials” or to be so incorporated, unless specifically otherwise provided in any such filing.
For information relating to our various stock compensation plans, see Item 12 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Canadian Tax Matters
Dividends
Since June 21, 2013 and unless stated otherwise, dividends paid by the Company to Canadian residents are eligible dividends as per the Income Tax Act (Canada).
Non-residents of Canada
Dividends paid or credited to non-residents of Canada are subject to a 25% withholding tax unless reduced by treaty. Under the Canada-United States Tax Convention (1980) (the Treaty), U.S. residents who are entitled to all of the benefits of the Treaty are generally subject to a 15% withholding tax.
Beginning in calendar year 2012, the Canada Revenue Agency has introduced new rules requiring residents of any country with which Canada has a tax treaty to certify that they reside in that country and are eligible to have Canadian non-resident tax withheld on the payment of dividends at the tax treaty rate. Registered shareholders should have completed the

Declaration of Eligibility for Benefits (Reduced Tax) under a Tax Treaty for a Non-Resident Person and returned it to our transfer agent, ComputerShare Investor Services Inc.

United States Tax Matters
U.S. residents
The following discussion summarizes certain U.S. federal income tax considerations relevant to an investment in the Common Shares by a U.S. holder. For purposes of this summary, a “U.S. holder” is a beneficial owner of Common Shares that holds such shares as capital assets under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), and is a citizen or resident of the United States and not of Canada, a corporation organized under the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof, or a person that is otherwise subject to U.S. federal income tax on a net income basis in respect of Common Shares. It does not address any aspect of U.S. federal gift or estate tax, or of state, local or non-U.S. tax laws and does not address aspects of U.S. federal income taxation applicable to U.S. holders holding options, warrants or other rights to acquire Common Shares. Further, this discussion does not address the U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. holders that are subject to special treatment under U.S. federal income tax laws, including, but not limited to U.S. holders owning directly, indirectly or by attribution 10% or more of the Company’s voting power;power or value of the Company's stock; broker-dealers; banks or insurance companies; financial institutions; regulated investment companies; taxpayers who have elected mark-to-market accounting; tax-exempt organizations; taxpayers who hold Common Shares as part of a “straddle,” “hedge,” or “conversion transaction” with other investments; individual retirement or other tax-deferred accounts; taxpayers whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar; partnerships or the partners therein; S corporations; or U.S. expatriates.
The discussion is based upon the provisions of the Code, the Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder, the Convention Between the United States and Canada with Respect to Taxes on Income and Capital, together with related Protocols and Competent Authority Agreements (the Convention), the administrative practices published by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the IRS)IRS and U.S. judicial decisions, all of which are subject to change. This discussion does not consider the potential effects, both adverse and beneficial, of any recently proposed legislation which, if enacted, could be applied, possibly on a retroactive basis, at any time.
Distributions on the Common Shares
Subject to the discussion below under “Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules,” U.S. holders generally will treat the gross amount of distributions paid by the Company equal to the U.S. dollar value of such dividends on the date the dividends are received or treated as received (based on the exchange rate on such date), without reduction for Canadian withholding tax (see “Canadian Tax Matters - Dividends - Non-residents of Canada”), as dividend income for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent of the Company’s current and accumulated earnings and profits. Because the Company does not expect to maintain calculations of its earnings and profits under U.S. federal income tax principles, it is expected that distributions paid to U.S. holders generally will be reported as dividends.
Individual U.S. holders will generally be eligible to treat dividends as “qualified dividend income” taxable at preferential rates with certain exceptions for short-term and hedged positions, and provided that the Company is not during the taxable year in which the dividends are paid (and was not in the preceding taxable year) classified as a “passive foreign investment company” (PFIC) as described below under “Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules.” Dividends paid on the Common Shares generally will not be eligible for the “dividends received” deduction allowed to corporate U.S. holders in respect of dividends from U.S. corporations.
If a U.S. holder receives foreign currency on a distribution that is not converted into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, the U.S. holder will have a tax basis in the foreign currency equal to its U.S. dollar value on the date the dividends are received or treated as received. Any gain or loss recognized upon a subsequent sale or other disposition of the foreign currency, including an exchange for U.S. dollars, will be U.S. source ordinary income or loss.
The amount of Canadian tax withheld generally will give rise to a foreign tax credit or deduction for U.S. federal income tax purposes (see “Canadian Tax Matters - Dividends - Non-residents of Canada”). Dividends paid by the Company generally will constitute “passive category income” for purposes of the foreign tax credit (or in the case of certain U.S. holders, “general category income”). The Code, as modified by the Convention, applies various limitations on the amount of foreign tax credit that may be available to a U.S. taxpayer. The Common Shares are currently traded on both the NASDAQ and TSX. Dividends paid by a foreign corporation that is at least 50% owned by U.S. persons may be treated as U.S. source income (rather than foreign source income) for foreign tax credit purposes to the extent they are attributable to earnings and profits of the foreign corporation from sources within the United States, if the foreign corporation has more than an insignificant amount of U.S. source earnings and profits. Although this rule does not appear to be intended to apply in the context of a public company such as the Company, we are not aware of any authority that would render it inapplicable. In part because the

Company does not expect to calculate its earnings and profits for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the effect of this rule may be to treat all or a portion of any dividends paid by the Company as U.S. source income, which in turn may limit a U.S. holder’s ability to claim a foreign tax credit for the Canadian withholding taxes payable in respect of the dividends. Subject to limitations, the Code permits a U.S. holder entitled to benefits under the Convention to elect to treat any dividends paid by the Company as foreign-source income for foreign tax credit purposes. The foreign tax credit rules are complex. U.S. holders

should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the implications of those rules for their investments in the Common Shares.
Sale, Exchange, Redemption or Other Disposition of Common Shares
Subject to the discussion below under “Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules,” the sale of Common Shares generally will result in the recognition of gain or loss to a U.S. holder in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized and the U.S. holder’s adjusted basis in the Common Shares. A U.S. holder’s tax basis in a Common Share will generally equal the price it paid for the Common Share. Any capital gain or loss will be long-term if the Common Shares have been held for more than one year. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations.
Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules
Special U.S. federal income tax rules apply to U.S. persons owning shares of a PFIC. The Company will be classified as a PFIC in a particular taxable year if either: (i) 75 percent or more of the Company’s gross income for the taxable year is passive income, or (ii) the average percentage of the value of the Company’s assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income is at least 50 percent. If the Company is treated as a PFIC for any year, U.S. holders may be subject to adverse tax consequences upon a sale, exchange, or other disposition of the Common Shares, or upon the receipt of certain “excess distributions” in respect of the Common Shares. Dividends paid by a PFIC are not qualified dividends eligible for taxation at preferential rates. Based on audited consolidated financial statements, we believe that the Company was not treated as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes with respect to its 20152018 or 20162019 taxable years. In addition, based on a review of the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and its current expectations regarding the value and nature of its assets and the sources and nature of its income, the Company does not anticipate becomingbeing treated as a PFIC for the 20172020 taxable year.
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding
Except in the case of corporations or other exempt holders, dividends paid to a U.S. holder may be subject to U.S. information reporting requirements and may be subject to backup withholding unless the U.S. holder provides an accurate taxpayer identification number on a properly completed IRS Form W-9 and certifies that no loss of exemption from backup withholding has occurred. The amount of any backup withholding will be allowed as a credit against the U.S. holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle the U.S. holder to a refund, provided that certain required information is timely furnished to the IRS.

Item 6.Selected Financial Data
The following table summarizes our selected consolidated financial data for the periods indicated. The selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes and “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The selected consolidated statement of income and balance sheet data for each of the five fiscal years indicated below has been derived from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements. Over the last five fiscal years we have acquired a number of companies including, but not limited to Catalyst, Liaison, Hightail, Guidance, Covisint, ECD Business, CCM Business, Recommind, ANX, CEM Business, Daegis, Actuate, GXS, EasyLink, and Global 360.Actuate. The results of these companies and all of our previously acquired companies have been included herein and have contributed to the growth in our revenues, net income and net income per share and such acquisitions affect period-to-period comparability.

Fiscal Year Ended June 30,  
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,  
2016201520142013201220192018201720162015
(In thousands, except per share data)(In thousands, except per share data) (In thousands, except per share data)
Statement of Income Data:  
Revenues(1)$1,824,228
$1,851,917
$1,624,699
$1,363,336
$1,207,473
$2,868,755
$2,815,241
$2,291,057
$1,824,228
$1,851,917
Net income, attributable to OpenText(2)$284,477
$234,327
$218,125
$148,520
$125,174
$285,501
$242,224
$1,025,659
$284,477
$234,327
Net income per share, basic, attributable to OpenText(1)$2.34
$1.92
$1.82
$1.27
$1.08
$1.06
$0.91
$4.04
$1.17
$0.96
Net income per share, diluted, attributable to OpenText(1)$2.33
$1.91
$1.81
$1.26
$1.07
$1.06
$0.91
$4.01
$1.17
$0.95
Weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding, basic121,463
122,092
119,674
117,208
115,780
268,784
266,085
253,879
242,926
244,184
Weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding, diluted122,038
122,957
120,576
118,124
117,468
269,908
267,492
255,805
244,076
245,914
(1) Effective July 1, 2018, we adopted Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 606 "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" (Topic 606) using the cumulative effect approach. We applied the standard to contracts that were not completed as of the date of the initial adoption. Results for reporting periods commencing on July 1, 2018 are presented under the new revenue standard, while prior period results continue to be reported under the previous standard.
(2) Fiscal 2017 included a significant one-time tax benefit of $876.1 million recorded in the first quarter of Fiscal 2017.
As of June 30,  
As of June 30,  
2016201520142013201220192018201720162015
Balance Sheet Data:  
Total assets (1)
$5,154,144
$4,353,330
$3,847,205
$2,615,385
$2,431,992
$7,933,975
$7,765,029
$7,480,562
$5,154,144
$4,353,330
Total Long-term liabilities (1)
$2,503,918
$1,899,086
$1,564,890
$751,421
$777,699
$3,034,588
$3,053,172
$2,820,200
$2,503,918
$1,899,086
Cash dividends per Common Share (2)
$0.8300
$0.7175
$0.6225
$0.1500
$
$0.6300
$0.5478
$0.4770
$0.4150
$0.3588
(1) Includes reclassifications of deferred tax assets and liabilities related to ASU 2015-17 “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes” and reclassification of debt issuance costs from Others assets to Long-term debt related to ASU 2015-03 "Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs". Please refer to Note 2 "Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements" of our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part IV of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(2) Our first dividend was paid in June 2013.



Item 7.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This Annual Report on Form 10-K, including this Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A), contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 21E of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 27A of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and is subject to the safe harboursharbors created by those sections. All statements other than statements of historical facts are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements.
When used in this report, the words “anticipates”, “expects”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “seeks”, “estimates”, “may”, “could”, “would”, "might", "will" and other similar language, as they relate to Open Text Corporation (“OpenText” or the “Company”), are intended to identify forward-looking statements under applicable securities laws. Specific forward-looking statements in this report include, but are not limited to: (i) statements about our focus in the fiscal year beginning July 1, 20162019 and ending June 30, 20172020 (Fiscal 2017)2020) on growth in earnings and cash flows; (ii) creating value through investments in broader Enterprise Information Management (EIM) capabilities; (iii) our future business plans and business planning process; (iv) statements relating to business trends; (v) statements relating to distribution; (vi) the Company’s presence in the cloud and in growth markets; (vii) product and solution developments, enhancements and releases and the timing thereof; (viii) the Company’s financial conditions, results of operations and earnings; (ix) the basis for any future growth and for our financial performance; (x) declaration of quarterly dividends; (xi) future tax rates; (xii) the changing regulatory environment including the tax reform legislation enacted through the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in the United States and its impact on our business; (xiii) annual recurring revenues; (xiv) research and development and related expenditures; (xv) our building, development and consolidation of our network infrastructure; (xvi) competition and changes in the competitive landscape; (xvii) our management and protection of intellectual property and other proprietary rights; (xviii) foreign sales and exchange rate fluctuations; (xix) cyclical or seasonal aspects of our business; (xx) capital expenditures; (xxi) potential legal and/or regulatory proceedings; (xxii) statements about the impact of "Open TextMagellan and Release 16"16; (xxiii) statements about acquisitions and (xxiii)their expected impact; and (xxiv) other matters.
In addition, any statements or information that refer to expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, performance or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking, and based on our current expectations, forecasts and projections about the operating environment, economies and markets in which we operate. Forward-looking statements reflect our current estimates, beliefs and assumptions, which are based on management’s perception of historic trends, current conditions and expected future developments, as well as other factors it believes are

appropriate in the circumstances. The forward-looking statements contained in this report are based on certain assumptions including the following: (i) countries continuing to implement and enforce existing and additional customs and security regulations relating to the provision of electronic information for imports and exports; (ii) our continued operation of a secure and reliable business network; (iii) the stability of general economic and market conditions, currency exchange rates, and interest rates; (iv) equity and debt markets continuing to provide us with access to capital; (v) our continued ability to identify, source and sourcefinance attractive and executable business combination opportunities; and (vi) our continued compliance with third party intellectual property rights. Management’s estimates, beliefs and assumptions are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive and other uncertainties and contingencies regarding future events and, as such, are subject to change. We can give no assurance that such estimates, beliefs and assumptions will prove to be correct.
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from the anticipated results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties that may affect forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: (i) integration of acquisitions and related restructuring efforts, including the quantum of restructuring charges and the timing thereof; (ii) the potential for the incurrence of or assumption of debt in connection with acquisitions and the impact on the ratings or outlooks of rating agencies on our outstanding debt securities; (iii) the possibility that the Company may be unable to meet its future reporting requirements under the Exchange Act, and the rules promulgated thereunder;thereunder, or applicable Canadian securities regulation; (iv) the risks associated with bringing new products and services to market; (v) fluctuations in currency exchange rates (including as a result of the impact of Brexit)Brexit and any policy changes resulting from trade and tariff disputes); (vi) delays in the purchasing decisions of the Company’s customers; (vii) the competition the Company faces in its industry and/or marketplace; (viii) the final determination of litigation, tax audits (including tax examinations in the United States, Canada or elsewhere) and other legal proceedings; (ix) potential exposure to greater than anticipated tax liabilities or expenses, including with respect to changes in Canadian, U.S. or international tax regimes; (x) the possibility of technical, logistical or planning issues in connection with the deployment of the Company’s products or services; (xi) the continuous commitment of the Company’s customers; (xii) demand for the Company’s products and services; (xiii) increase in exposure to international business risks (including as a result of the impact of Brexit)Brexit and any policy changes resulting from the new U.S. administration, including any transition from the North American Free Trade Agreement to the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement) as we continue to increase our international operations; (xiv) inability to raise capital at all or on not unfavorable terms in the future; and (xv) downward pressure on our share price and dilutive effect of future sales or issuances of equity securities (including in connection with future acquisitions); and (xvi) potential changes in ratings or outlooks of rating agencies on our outstanding debt securities. Other factors that may affect forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: (i) the future performance, financial and

otherwise, of the Company; (ii) the ability of the Company to bring new products and services to market and to increase sales; (iii) the strength of the Company’s product development pipeline; (iv) failure to secure and protect patents, trademarks and other proprietary rights; (v) infringement of third-party proprietary rights triggering indemnification obligations and resulting in significant expenses or restrictions on our ability to provide our products or services; (vi) failure to comply with privacy laws and regulations that are extensive, open to various interpretations and complex to implement;implement including General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and Country by Country Reporting; (vii) the Company’s growth and other profitability prospects; (viii) the estimated size and growth prospects of the EIM market; (ix) the Company’s competitive position in the EIM market and its ability to take advantage of future opportunities in this market; (x) the benefits of the Company’s products and services to be realized by customers; (xi) the demand for the Company’s products and services and the extent of deployment of the Company’s products and services in the EIM marketplace; (xii) the Company’s financial condition and capital requirements; (xiii) system or network failures or information security breaches in connection with the Company's offerings;offerings and information technology systems generally; and (xiv) failure to attract and retain key personnel to develop and effectively manage the Company's business.
Readers should carefully review Part I, Item 1A "Risk Factors" and other documents we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and other securities regulators. A number of factors may materially affect our business, financial condition, operating results and prospects. These factors include but are not limited to those set forth in Part I, Item 1A "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Any one of these factors, and other factors that we are unaware of, or currently deem immaterial, may cause our actual results to differ materially from recent results or from our anticipated future results.
The following MD&A is intended to help readers understand our results of operations and financial condition, and is
provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our Consolidated Financial Statements and
the accompanying Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
All dollar and percentage comparisons made herein underrefer to the sections titled "Fiscal 2016year ended June 30, 2019 (Fiscal 2019) compared with the year ended June 30, 2018 (Fiscal 2018). Please refer to Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for Fiscal 2018 for a comparative discussion of our Fiscal 2018 financial results as compared to Fiscal 2015" refer to Fiscal 2016 compared with the twelve months ended June 30, 2015 (Fiscal 2015). All dollar and percentage comparisons made herein under the sections titled "Fiscal 2015 compared to Fiscal 2014" refer to Fiscal 2015 compared with the twelve months ended June 30, 2014 (Fiscal 2014).2017.
Where we say “we”, “us”, “our”, “OpenText” or “the Company”, we mean Open Text Corporation or Open Text Corporation and its subsidiaries, as applicable.

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
We operate in the Enterprise Information Management (EIM) market.market where we enable the intelligent and connected enterprise. We are an independent company providing adevelop enterprise software to support businesses in becoming digital businesses and governments in becoming digital governments. The comprehensive OpenText EIM platform and suite of software products and services provide secure and scalable solutions for global companies and governments around the world. With our software, organizations manage a valuable asset - information. Information that assist organizations in finding, utilizing,is made more valuable by connecting it to digital business processes, information that is enriched with analytics, information that is protected and sharing businesssecure throughout its entire lifecycle, information from any device in ways which are intuitive, efficientthat captivates customers, and productive. Our technologiesinformation that connects and business solutions address onefuels some of the biggest problems encountered by enterprises today: the explosive growth of information volumeworld's largest digital supply chains in manufacturing, retail, and formats.financial services. Our software and services allow organizations to manage the information that flows into, out of, and throughout the enterprise as part of daily operations. OurEIM solutions help to improve customer satisfaction and digital experience, gain analytical insight, improve collaboration with business partners, address the legal and business requirements associated with information governance, and help to ensure that information remains secure and private, as demanded in today's highly regulated climate.
Our products and services are designed to provideenable organizations to secure their information so that they can collaborate with confidence, validate endpoints with all machines and the benefitsInternet of maximizingThings (IoT), stay ahead of the regulatory technology curve, identify threats that cross their networks, leverage discovery with information forensics, and gain insight and action through analytics, artificial intelligence (AI) and automation.
We offer software through traditional on-premises solutions, cloud solutions or a combination of both. We believe our customers will operate in hybrid on-premises and cloud environments, and we are ready to support the delivery method the customer prefers. In providing choice and flexibility, we strive to maximize the lifetime value of enterprise information while largely minimizing its risks. Our solutions incorporate collaborative and mobile technologies and are delivered for on-premises deployment as well as through cloud, hybrid and managed hosted services models to provide the flexibility and cost efficiencies demanded by the market. In addition, we provide solutions that facilitate the exchange of information and transactions that occur between supply chain participants, such as manufacturers, retailers, distributors and financial institutions, and are central to a company’s ability to effectively collaboraterelationship with its partners.our customers.
Our initial public offering was on the NASDAQ in 1996 and we were subsequently listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) in 1998. We are a multinational company and as of June 30, 2016,2019, employed approximately 8,90013,100 people worldwide.
Our ticker symbol on both the NASDAQ and the TSX is "OTEX".
Fiscal 20162019 Summary:
During the first quarter of Fiscal 2019, we adopted Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 606 "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" (Topic 606) using the cumulative effect approach and recorded a net increase of approximately $30 million to retained earnings as of July 1, 2018. Results for reporting periods commencing on July 1, 2018 are presented under Topic 606, while prior periods, unless specifically referred to in this MD&A, continue to be reported under the previous

standard. Please refer to Note 1 "Basis of Presentation" and Note 3 "Revenues" to our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.
During Fiscal 20162019 we saw the following activity:
Total revenue was $1,824.2$2,868.8 million, down 1.5%up 1.9% compared to the prior fiscal year; up 3.0%3.8% after factoring the impact of $79.7$53.2 million of foreign exchange rate changes.
Total annual recurring revenue, which we define as the sum of cloud services and subscriptions revenue and customer support revenue, was $1,540.5$2,155.7 million, down 1.1%up 4.6% compared to the prior fiscal year; up 3.0%6.2% after factoring the impact of $64.6$34.0 million of foreign exchange rate changes.
Cloud services and subscriptions revenue was $601.0$907.8 million, down 0.7%up 9.5% compared to the prior fiscal year; up 2.5%10.8% after factoring the impact of $19.4$10.8 million of foreign exchange rate changes.
License revenue was $283.7$428.1 million, down 3.6%2.2% compared to the prior fiscal year; up 1.5%0.4% after factoring the impact of $15.1$11.2 million of foreign exchange rate changes.
GAAP-based EPS, diluted, was $2.33$1.06 compared to $1.91$0.91 in the prior fiscal year.
Non-GAAP-based EPS, diluted, was $3.54$2.76 compared to $3.46$2.56 in the prior fiscal year.
GAAP-based gross margin was 68.5%67.6% compared to 67.7%66.2% in the prior fiscal year.
Non-GAAP-based gross margin was 74.1% compared to 73.0% in the prior fiscal year.
GAAP-based operating marginnet income attributable to OpenText was 20.2%$285.5 million compared to 18.8%$242.2 million in the prior fiscal year.
Non-GAAP-based operating marginnet income attributable to OpenText was 33.8%$744.7 million compared to 30.9%$683.6 million in the prior fiscal year.
Adjusted EBITDA was $1,100.3 million compared to $1,020.4 million in the prior fiscal year.
Operating cash flow was $525.7$876.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2019, up 1%23.8% from the prior fiscal year.
Cash and cash equivalents was $1,283.8$941.0 million as of June 30, 2016,2019, compared to $700.0$682.9 million as of June 30, 2015. The Company raised $600 million in debt in Fiscal 2016. For more details, refer to the "Liquidity and Capital resources" section below.

2018.
See "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" below for a reconciliationdefinitions and reconciliations of GAAP-based measures to Non-GAAP-based measures.
See "Acquisitions" below for the impact of acquisitions on the period-to-period comparability of results.
Acquisitions
Our competitive position in the marketplace requires us to maintain a complex and evolving array of technologies, products, services and capabilities. In light of the continually evolving marketplace in which we operate, on an ongoing basis we regularly evaluate acquisition opportunities within the EIM market and at any time may be in various stages of discussions with respect to such opportunities.
Acquisition of ANXe Business Corporation
On May 1, 2016, we acquired ANXe Business Corporation (ANX), a leading provider of cloud-based information exchange services to the automotive and healthcare industries, for approximately $104.6 million. We believe this acquisition will strengthen our industry presence and reach in the automotive and healthcare industries through strong customer

relationships and targeted business partner collaboration solutions. The results of operations of ANX have been consolidated with those of OpenText beginning May 1, 2016.
Acquisition of Certain Customer Experience Software Assets from HP Inc.
On April 30, 2016, we acquired certain customer experience software and services assets and liabilities from HP Inc. (CEM Business) for approximately $160.0 million, of which $7.3 million is currently held back and unpaid in accordance with the terms of the purchase agreement. We believe that the acquisition will complement our current software portfolio, particularly our Customer Experience Management and Cloud offerings. The results of operations have been consolidated with those of OpenText beginning April 30, 2016.
Acquisition of Daegis Inc.
On November 23, 2015, we acquired Daegis Inc. (Daegis), a global information governance, data migration solutions and development company, based in Irvine, Texas, United States. Total consideration for Daegis was $23.3 million ($22.1 million - net of cash acquired). We believe this acquisition enables OpenText to strengthen our current information governance capabilities. The results of operations of Daegis have been consolidated with those of OpenText beginning November 23, 2015.
We believe our acquisitions support our long-term strategic direction, strengthen our competitive position, expand our customer base, provide greater scale to accelerate innovation, grow our earnings and provide superior shareholder value. We expect to continue to strategically acquire companies, products, services and technologies to augment our existing business. Our acquisitions, particularly significant ones, can affect the period-to-period comparability of our results. See note 18 "Acquisitions" to our Consolidated Financial Statements for more details.
Catalyst Repository Systems Inc. (Catalyst)
On January 31, 2019, we acquired all of the equity interest in Catalyst, a leading provider of eDiscovery that designs, develops and supports market-leading cloud eDiscovery software, for approximately $70.8 million in an all cash transaction. This acquisition complements and extends our EIM portfolio. The results of operations of this acquisition have been consolidated with those of OpenText beginning January 31, 2019.
Liaison Technologies, Inc. (Liaison)
On December 17, 2018, we acquired all of the equity interest in Liaison, a leading provider of cloud-based business to business integration, for approximately $310.6 million in an all cash transaction. This acquisition complements and extends our EIM portfolio. The results of operations of this acquisition have been consolidated with those of OpenText beginning December 17, 2018.
Outlook for Fiscal 20172020
WhileAs an organization, our management believes in delivering “Total Growth”, meaning we continuestrive towards delivering value through organic initiatives, innovations and acquisitions, as well as financial performance. This growth is further enhanced

through our direct and indirect sales distribution channels. With an emphasis on increasing recurring revenues and expanding our margins, we believe our “Total Growth” strategy will ultimately drive overall cash flow generation, thus helping to offer on-premises solutions, we realize that the EIM market is broadfuel our disciplined capital allocation approach and further drive our ability to deepen our account coverage and identify and execute strategic acquisitions. With strategic acquisitions, we are agnosticbetter positioned to whether a customer prefers an on-premises solution, cloud solution, or combination of both (hybrid).expand our product portfolio and improve our ability to innovate and grow organically, which then further helps us to meet our long-term growth targets. We believe givingthis “Total Growth” strategy is a durable model that will create shareholder value over both the near and long-term.
We are committed to continuous innovation. Our investments in research and development (R&D) drive product innovation, increasing the value of our offerings to our installed customer choicebase, which includes Global 10,000 companies. More valuable products, coupled with our established global partner program, lead to greater distribution and flexibility willcross-selling opportunities which further help us to striveachieve organic growth. This fiscal year we invested approximately $322 million or approximately 11% of revenue in R&D, in line with our target to obtain long-term customer value. We measure long-term value by looking at our recurring revenue, earnings and operating cash flow. We define recurring revenue as the sumspend approximately 11% to 13% of our “Cloud services and subscriptions revenue”, “Customer support revenue” and “Professional services revenue”. In Fiscal 2016 recurring revenue was $1,541 million, which represented 84% of our total revenues and was relatively stable (down 1.1%) compared to Fiscal 2015. Our Cloud services and subscriptions revenues was also relatively stable (down 0.7%) in Fiscal 2016 compared to Fiscal 2015. Our net income for Fiscal 2016 was up 21% compared to Fiscal 2015 and our operating cash flow was relatively flat, growing 1% over the same period. We believe customers are looking for choice and flexibility in how they consume technology and we look to continue to provide long term value to our customers.
Additionally, Customer support revenues, which are a recurring source of income for us, make up a significant portion of our revenue mix. Our management reviews our Customer support renewal rates on a quarterly basis and we use these rates as a method of monitoring our customer service performance. For the three months ended June 30, 2016, our Customer support renewal rate was approximately 90%, consistent with the Customer support renewal rate during the three months ended June 30, 2015.R&D each fiscal year.
We expect to continue to pursue strategic acquisitions in the future to strengthen our service offerings in the EIM market. We believe we areremain a value oriented and disciplined acquirer and consolidator, having efficiently deployed $3.7$6.2 billion on acquisitions over the last 10 years. Mergers and acquisitions are one of our leading growth drivers. We believe in creating value by focusing on acquiring strategic businesses, integrating them into our business model and using our acquired assets to innovate. We have developed a philosophy, which we refer to as “The OpenText Business System”, that is designed to create value by leveraging a clear set of operational mandates for integrating newly acquired companies and assets. We see our ability to successfully integrate acquired companies and assets into our business as a strength and pursuing strategic acquisitions is an important aspect to our growthTotal Growth strategy. We expect to continue to acquire strategically, to integrate and innovate, to deepen and strengthen our intelligent information platform for customers.
In Fiscal 2016,2019, we further demonstrated the implementation of thisour strategy by acquiring Daegis, ANX,Liaison Technologies, Inc. (Liaison) and CEM Business. On June 20, 2016 we announced that we entered into a definitive agreementCatalyst Repository Systems Inc. (Catalyst). We regularly evaluate acquisition opportunities on an ongoing basis and at any time may be at various stages of discussion with respect to acquire customer communication management assets from HP Inc. for approximately $315 million. On July 20, 2016, we closed our previously announced acquisition of Recommind Inc., a leading provider of eDiscovery and Information analytics. For additional details, please refer to note 23 "Subsequent Events" to our Consolidated Financial Statements.such opportunities.
While continuing to acquire companies is our leading growth driver, our growth strategy also includes organic growth through internal innovation. Over the last three fiscal years, we have invested approximately $567 million in research and development (R&D) and we typically target to spend approximately 10% to 12% of revenues for R&D. We believe our ability to leverage our global presence is helpful to our ability to grow organically.
In April, 2016 we introduced "OpenText Release 16" (Release 16), which is an integrated digital information platform that manages and analyzes the entire flow of information, addressing key areas of the user experience, machine-to-machine integration, automation and other aspects of managing unstructured data in a digital first organization.

This release is the most functionally and integration-complete EIM platform that we have released to date and we believe it is well suited to drive our go-to-market plan for years to come.
We see an opportunity to help our customers become “digital businesses” and, with Release 16 as well as our recent acquisitions, we believe we have a strong platform to integrate personalized analytics and insights onto our OpenText EIM suites of products, which will further our vision to enable “the digital world” and strengthen our position among leaders in EIM.
We also believe our diversified geographic profile helps strengthen our position and helps to reduce the impact of a downturn in the economy that may occur in any one specific region.


CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements. These estimates, judgments and assumptions are evaluated on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable at that time, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.time. Actual results may differ materially from those estimates. Note 2 “Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements” to the Consolidated Financial Statements contains a summary of the policies that involve assumptions, judgments and estimates and have the greatest impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements. The policies listed below are areas that may contain key components of our results of operations and are based on complex rules requiring us to make judgments and estimates and consequently, we consider these to be our critical accounting policies. Some of these accounting policies involve complex situations and require a higher degree of judgment, either in the application and interpretation of existing accounting literature or in the development of estimates that reflectaffect our more significant estimates, judgments and assumptions andfinancial statements. The critical accounting policies which we believe are the most criticalimportant to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results include the following:
(i)Revenue recognition,
(ii)Capitalized software,Goodwill,
(iii)Business combinations,Acquired intangibles, and
(iv)Goodwill,Income taxes.
(v)Acquired intangibles,
(vi)Restructuring charges,
(vii)Foreign currency, and
(viii)Income taxes.     
For a full discussion of all our accounting policies, please see Note 2 "Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements" to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Revenue recognition
We recognize revenues inIn accordance with Accounting Standard Codification (ASC) Topic 985-605, “Software606, we account for a customer contract when we obtain written approval, the contract is committed, the rights of the parties, including the payment terms, are identified, the contract has commercial substance and consideration is probable of collection. Revenue Recognition” (Topic 985-605)is recognized when, or as, control of a promised product or service is transferred to our customers in an amount that reflects the consideration we expect to be entitled to in exchange for our products and services (at its transaction price). Estimates of variable consideration and the determination of whether to include estimated amounts in the transaction price are based on readily available information, which may include historical, current and forecasted information, taking into consideration the type of customer, the type of transaction and specific facts and circumstances of each arrangement. We report revenue net of any revenue-based taxes assessed by governmental authorities that are imposed on and concurrent with specific revenue producing transactions.

We record product revenues from softwarehave four revenue streams: license, cloud services and subscriptions, customer support, and professional service and other.
License revenue
Our license revenue can be broadly categorized as perpetual licenses, term licenses and productssubscription licenses, all of which are deployed on the customer’s premises (on-premise).
Perpetual licenses: We sell perpetual licenses which provide customers the right to use software for an indefinite period of time in exchange for a one-time license fee, which is generally paid at contract inception. Our perpetual licenses provide a right to use intellectual property (IP) that is functional in nature and have significant stand-alone functionality. Accordingly, for perpetual licenses of functional IP, revenue is recognized at the point-in-time when persuasive evidencecontrol has been transferred to the customer, which normally occurs once software activation keys have been made available for download.
Term licenses and Subscription licenses: We sell both term and subscription licenses which provide customers the right to use software for a specified period in exchange for a fee, which may be paid at contract inception or paid in installments over the period of an arrangement exists,the contract. Like perpetual licenses, both our term licenses and subscription licenses are functional IP that have significant stand-alone functionality. Accordingly, for both term and subscription licenses, revenue is recognized at the point-in-time when the customer is able to use and benefit from the software, product haswhich is normally once software activation keys have been shipped, theremade available for download at the commencement of the term.
Cloud services and subscriptions revenue
Cloud services and subscriptions revenue are no significant uncertainties surrounding product acceptance byfrom hosting arrangements where, in connection with the licensing of software, the end user doesn’t take possession of the software, as well as from end-to-end fully outsourced business-to-business (B2B) integration solutions to our customers (collectively referred to as cloud arrangements). The software application resides on our hardware or that of a third party, and the customer accesses and uses the feessoftware on an as-needed basis. Our cloud arrangements can be broadly categorized as "platform as a service" (PaaS), "software as a service" (SaaS), cloud subscriptions and managed services.
PaaS/ SaaS/ Cloud Subscriptions (collectively referred to here as cloud-based solutions): We offer cloud-based solutions that provide customers the right to access our software through the internet. Our cloud-based solutions represent a series of distinct services that are fixedsubstantially the same and determinable, and collection is considered probable. We usehave the residual methodsame pattern of transfer to recognize revenues on delivered elements when a license agreement includes one or more elementsthe customer. These services are made available to the customer continuously throughout the contractual period, however, the extent to which the customer uses the services may vary at the customer’s discretion. The payment for cloud-based solutions may be deliveredreceived either at a future date if evidenceinception of the fair valuearrangement, or over the term of all undelivered elements exists. If an undelivered elementthe arrangement.
These cloud-based solutions are considered to have a single performance obligation where the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefit, and as such we recognize revenue for these cloud-based solutions ratably over the arrangement exists underterm of the license arrangement, revenuescontractual agreement. For example, revenue related to cloud-based solutions that are provided on a usage basis, such as the undelivered elementnumber of users, is deferredrecognized based on vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE)a customer’s utilization of the fair valueservices in a given period.
Additionally, a software license is present in a cloud-based solutions arrangement if all of the undelivered element.following criteria are met:
Our multiple-element sales arrangements include arrangements where software licenses and(i) The customer has the associated post contract customer support (PCS) are sold together. We have established VSOEcontractual right to take possession of the fair value of the undelivered PCS element based on the contracted price for renewal PCS included in the original multiple element sales arrangement, as substantiated by contractual termssoftware at any time without significant penalty; and our significant PCS renewal experience, from our existing worldwide base. Our multiple element sales arrangements generally include irrevocable rights
(ii) It is feasible for the customer to renew PCS afterhost the bundled term ends.software independent of us.
In these cases where a software license is present in a cloud-based solutions arrangement it is assessed to determine if it is distinct from the cloud-based solutions arrangement. The revenue allocated to the distinct software license would be recognized at the point in time the software license is transferred to the customer, is not subjectwhereas the revenue allocated to any economic or other penalty for failure to renew. It is our experience that customers generally exercise their renewal PCS option. In the renewal transaction, PCS is soldhosting performance obligation would be recognized ratably on a stand-alonemonthly basis toover the licensees one yearcontractual term unless evidence suggests that revenue is earned, or more afterobligations are fulfilled in a different pattern over the original multiple element salescontractual term of the arrangement. The exercised renewal PCS price is consistent with the renewal price in the original multiple element sales arrangement, although an adjustment to reflect consumer price changes is common.
If VSOE of fair value does not existManaged services: We provide comprehensive B2B process outsourcing services for all undelivered elements, all revenuesday-to-day operations of a customers’ B2B integration program. Customers using these managed services are deferred until sufficient evidence existsnot permitted to take possession of our software and the contract is for a defined period, where customers pay a monthly or all elements have been delivered.
Cloudquarterly fee. Our performance obligation is satisfied as we provide services of operating and subscription revenues consist of (i) software asmanaging a service offerings (ii) managed service arrangements and  (iii) subscription revenuescustomer's electronic data interchange (EDI) environment. Revenue relating to on premise offerings.  The customer contracts for each of these three offerings are long term contracts (greater than twelve months) and areservices is recognized using an output method based on the customer’s usageexpected level of service we will provide over the term of the contract.

In connection with cloud subscription and managed service contracts, we often agree to perform a variety of services before the customer goes live, such as, converting and migrating customer data, building interfaces and providing training. These services are considered an outsourced suite of professional services which can involve certain project-based activities. These services can be provided at the initiation of a contract, period.during the implementation or on an ongoing basis as part of the customer life cycle. These services can be charged separately on a fixed fee or time and materials basis, or the costs associated may be recovered as part of the ongoing cloud subscription or managed services fee. These outsourced professional services are considered to be distinct from the ongoing hosting services and represent a separate performance obligation within our cloud subscription or managed services arrangements. The obligation to provide outsourced professional services is satisfied over time, with the customer simultaneously receiving and consuming the benefits as we satisfy our performance obligations. For outsourced professional services, we recognize revenue by measuring progress toward the satisfaction of our performance obligation. Progress for services that are contracted for a fixed price is generally measured based on hours incurred as a portion of total estimated hours. As a practical expedient, when we invoice a customer at an amount that corresponds directly with the value to the customer of our performance to date, we recognize revenue at that amount.
Customer support revenue
Customer support revenue is associated with such  contractsperpetual, term license and on-premise subscription arrangements. As customer support is recognized once usage has been measured,not critical to the feecustomer's ability to derive benefit from its right to use our software, customer support is fixed and determinable and collection is probable.
In certain managed services arrangements, we sell transaction processingconsidered as a distinct performance obligation when sold together in a bundled arrangement along with implementationthe software.
Customer support consists primarily of technical support and start-up services. The implementationthe provision of unspecified updates and start-up services do not have stand-alone value and, therefore, they do not qualify as separate

units of accounting and are not separated. We believe these services do not have stand-alone value as (i)upgrades on a when-and-if-available basis. Customer support for perpetual licenses is renewable, generally on an annual basis, at the customer only receives value from these services in conjunction with the useoption of the related transaction processing service, (ii) we do not sellcustomer. Customer support for term and subscription licenses is renewable concurrently with such services separately, and (iii)licenses for the outputsame duration of such services cannot be re-sold bytime. Payments for customer support are generally made at the customer. Revenues related to implementation and start-up services are recognized over the longerinception of the contract term or in installments over the estimatedterm of the maintenance period. Our customer life. In some arrangements,support team is ready to provide these maintenance services, as needed, to the customer during the contract term. As the elements of customer support are delivered concurrently and have the same pattern of transfer, customer support is accounted for as a single performance obligation. The customer benefits evenly throughout the contract period from the guarantee that the customer support resources and personnel will be available to them, and that any unspecified upgrades or unspecified future products developed by us will be made available. Revenue for customer support is recognized ratably over the contract period based on the start and end dates of the maintenance term, in line with how we also sellbelieve services are provided.
Professional service and other revenue
Our professional services, which do have stand-alone valuewhen offered along with software licenses, consist primarily of technical services and can be separated from other elements in the arrangement, in which case the revenue relatedtraining services. Technical services may include installation, customization, implementation or consulting services. Training services may include access to these services is recognized as the service is performed. In some arrangements, we also sell professional services asonline modules or delivering a separate single element arrangement. The revenue related to these services is recognized as the service is performed. We defer all direct and relevant costs associated with implementation of long-term customer contractstraining package customized to the extent such costs can be recovered through guaranteed contract revenues.
Service revenues consist of revenues from consulting, implementation, training and integration services. These services are set forth separately incustomer’s needs. At the contractual arrangements such that the total price of the customer arrangement is expected to vary ascustomer’s discretion, we may offer one, all, or a result of the inclusion or exclusionmix of these services. For those contracts where thePayment for professional services are not essential to the functionality of any other element of the transaction, we determine VSOE of fair value for these servicesis generally a fixed fee or is a fee based upon normal pricing and discounting practices for these services when sold separately. These consulting and implementation services contracts are primarilyon time and materials based contracts that are, on average, less than six months in length. Revenues from thesematerials.
Professional services are recognized at the time such services are performed.
Revenue for contracts that are primarily fixed fee arrangements, wherein the services are not essential to the functionality of a software element, are recognized using the proportional performance method.
Revenues from training and integration services are recognizedcan be arranged in the periodsame contract as the software license or in which thesea separate contract.
As our professional services are performed.
We may enter into certain long-term sales contracts involving the sale of integrated solutions that include the modification and customization of software and the provision of services that are essential todo not significantly change the functionality of the license and our customers can benefit from our professional services on their own or together with other elements in this arrangement. As prescribed by ASC Topic 985-605,readily available resources, we recognize revenues from such arrangements in accordance withconsider professional services as distinct within the contract accounting guidelines in ASC Topic 605-35, “Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts” (Topic 605-35), after evaluating for separation of any non-Topic 605-35 elements in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 605-25, “Multiple-Element Arrangements” (Topic 605-25).
When circumstances exist that allow us to make reasonably dependable estimates of contract revenues, contract costs and the progresscontext of the contractcontract.
Professional service revenue is recognized over time so long as: (i) the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits as we perform them, (ii) our performance creates or enhances an asset the customer controls as we perform, and (iii) our performance does not create an asset with alternative use and we have enforceable right to completion, we account for sales under such long-term contracts using the percentage-of-completion (POC) method of accounting. Under the POC method, progress towards completionpayment.
If all of the contract is measured based upon either input measures or output measures. Weabove criteria are met, we use an input-based measure of progress towards completion based upon an input measure and calculate this as the proportion of the actualfor recognizing professional service revenue. For example, we may consider total labor hours incurred compared to the total estimatedexpected labor hours. For training and integration services rendered under such contracts, revenues are recognized as the services are rendered. We will review, onAs a quarterly basis, the total estimated remaining costs to completion for each of these contracts and apply the impact of any changes on the POC prospectively. Ifpractical expedient, when we invoice a customer at any time we anticipatean amount that the estimated remaining costs to completion will exceedcorresponds directly with the value of the contract, the resulting loss will be recognized immediately.
When circumstances exist that prevent us from making reasonably dependable estimates of contract revenues, we account for sales under such long-term contracts using the completed contract method.
We execute certain sales contracts through resellers and distributors (collectively, resellers) and also large, well-capitalized partners such as SAP and Accenture. (collectively, channel partners).
Revenues relating to sales through resellers and channel partners are recognized when all the recognition criteria have been met, in other words, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred in the reporting period, the fee is fixed and determinable, and collectability is probable. In addition we assess the creditworthiness of each reseller and if the reseller is newly formed, undercapitalized or in financial difficulty any revenues expected to emanate from such resellers are deferred and recognized only when cash is received and all other revenue recognition criteria are met.
Capitalized software
We capitalize software development costs in accordance with ASC Topic 350-40 – "Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal-Use". We capitalize costs for software to be used internally when we enter the application development stage. This occurs when we complete the preliminary project stage, management authorizes and commits to funding the project, and it is feasible that the project will be completed and the software will perform the intended function. We cease to capitalize costs related to a software project when it enters the post implementation and operation stage. If different determinations are made with respect to the statecustomer of development of a software project, then the amount capitalized and the amount chargedour performance to expense fordate, we will recognize revenue at that project could differ materially.
Costs capitalized during the application development stage consist of payroll and related costs for employees who are directly associated with, and who devote time directly to, a project to develop software for internal use. We also capitalize theamount.

direct costsMaterial rights
To the extent that we grant our customer an option to acquire additional products or services in one of materialsour arrangements, we will account for the option as a distinct performance obligation in the contract only if the option provides a material right to the customer that the customer would not receive without entering into the contract. For example, if we give the customer an option to acquire additional goods or services in the future at a price that is significantly lower than the current price, this would be a material right as it allows the customer to, in effect, pay in advance for the option to purchase future products or services. If a material right exists in one of our contracts then revenue allocated to the option is deferred and we would recognize that deferred revenue only when those future products or services are transferred or when the option expires.
Based on history, our contracts do not typically contain material rights and when they do, the material right is not significant to our consolidated financial statements.
Arrangements with multiple performance obligations
Our contracts generally contain more than one of the products and services which generally includes outside contractors,listed above. Determining whether goods and interest.services are considered distinct performance obligations that should be accounted for separately or as a single performance obligation may require judgment, specifically when assessing whether both of the following two criteria are met:
the customer can benefit from the product or service either on its own or together with other resources that are readily available to the customer; and
our promise to transfer the product or service to the customer is separately identifiable from other promises in the contract.
If these criteria are not met, we determine an appropriate measure of progress based on the nature of our overall promise for the single performance obligation.
If these criteria are met, each product or service is separately accounted for as a distinct performance obligation and the total transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation on a relative standalone selling price (SSP) basis.
Standalone selling price
The SSP reflects the price we would charge for a specific product or service if it was sold separately in similar circumstances and to similar customers. In most cases we are able to establish the SSP based on observable data. We dotypically establish a narrow SSP range for our products and services and assess this range on a periodic basis or when material changes in facts and circumstances warrant a review.
If the SSP is not capitalize any general and administrative or overhead costs or costs incurred during the application development stage related to training or data conversion costs. Costs related to upgrades and enhancements to internal-use software, if those upgrades and enhancements result in additional functionality, are capitalized. If upgrades and enhancements do not result in additional functionality, those costs are expensed as incurred. If different determinations are made with respect to whether upgrades or enhancements to software projects would result in additional functionality,directly observable, then we estimate the amount capitalized andusing either the expected cost plus a margin or residual approach. Estimating SSP requires judgment that could impact the amount chargedand timing of revenue recognized. SSP is a formal process whereby management considers multiple factors including, but not limited to, expense for that project could differ materially.geographic or regional specific factors, competitive positioning, internal costs, profit objectives, and pricing practices.
We amortize capitalized costsTransaction Price Allocation
In bundled arrangements, where we have more than one distinct performance obligation, we must allocate the transaction price to each performance obligation based on its relative SSP. However, in certain bundled arrangements, the SSP may not always be directly observable. For instance, in bundled arrangements with respect to development projects for internal-use software whenlicense and customer support, we allocate the software is ready for use. The capitalized software development costs are generally amortizedtransaction price between the license and customer support performance obligations using the straight-line method overresidual approach because we have determined that the SSP for licenses in these arrangements are highly variable. We use the residual approach only for our license arrangements. When the SSP is observable but contractual pricing does not fall within our established SSP range, then an adjustment is required and we will allocate the transaction price between license and customer support at a 5-year period. In determiningconstant ratio reflecting the mid-point of the established SSP range.
When two or more contracts are entered into at or near the same time with the same customer, we evaluate the facts and reassessingcircumstances associated with the estimated useful life over whichnegotiation of those contracts. Where the cost incurredcontracts are negotiated as a package, we will account for them as a single arrangement and allocate the consideration for the software should be amortized,combined contracts among the performance obligations accordingly.

In accordance with Topic 606, we consider the effects of obsolescence, technology, competitionbelieve there are significant assumptions, judgments and other economic factors. If different determinations are made with respect to the estimated useful life of the software, the amount of amortization charged in a particular period could differ materially.
Business combinations
We apply the provisions of ASC Topic 805, “Business Combinations” (Topic 805),estimates involved in the accounting for our acquisitions. It requires us to recognize separately from goodwill the assets acquiredrevenue recognition discussed above and the liabilities assumed at their acquisition date fair values. Goodwill as of the acquisition date is measured as the excess of consideration transferred over the net of the acquisition date fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. While we use our best estimates and assumptions to accurately value assets acquired and liabilities, including contingent consideration where applicable, assumed at the acquisition date, our estimates are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement, particularly since these assumptions, judgment and estimates are based in partcould impact the timing of when revenue is recognized and could have a material impact on historical experience and information obtained from the management of the acquired companies. As a result, during the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date, we may record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the corresponding offset to goodwill in the period identified. Furthermore, when valuing certain intangible assets that we have acquired, critical estimates may be made relating to, but not limited to: (i) future expected cash flows from software license sales, cloud SaaS and PaaS contracts, support agreements, consulting agreements and other customer contracts (ii) the acquired company's brand and competitive position, as well as assumptions about the period of time that the acquired brand will continue to be used in the combined company's product portfolio, and (iii) discount rates. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period or final determination of the values of assets acquired or liabilities assumed, whichever comes first, any subsequent adjustments would be recorded to our Consolidated Statements of Income.Financial Statements.
Costs to exit or restructure certain activities of an acquired company or our internal operations are accounted for as one-time termination and exit costs pursuant to Topic 420 and are accounted for separately from the business combination.
For a given acquisition, we generally identify certain pre-acquisition contingencies as of the acquisition date and may extend our review and evaluation of these pre-acquisition contingencies throughout the measurement period in order to obtain sufficient information to assess whether we include these contingencies as a part of the purchase price allocation and, if so, to determine the estimated amounts.
If we determine that a pre-acquisition contingency (non-income tax related) is probable in nature and estimable as of the acquisition date, we record our best estimate for such a contingency as a part of the preliminary purchase price allocation. We often continue to gather information and evaluate our pre-acquisition contingencies throughout the measurement period and if we make changes to the amounts recorded or if we identify additional pre-acquisition contingencies during the measurement period, such amounts will be included in the purchase price allocation during the measurement period and, subsequently, in our results of operations.
Uncertain tax positions and tax related valuation allowances assumed in connection with a business combination are initially estimated as of the acquisition date. We review these items during the measurement period as we continue to actively seek and collect information relating to facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date. Changes to these uncertain tax positions and tax related valuation allowances made subsequent to the measurement period, or if they relate to facts and circumstances that did not exist at the acquisition date, are recorded in our provision for income taxes in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price in a business combination over the fair value of net tangible and intangible assets acquired. The carrying amount of goodwill is periodically reviewed for impairment (at a minimum annually) and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of this asset may not be recoverable.

Our operations are analyzed by management and our chief operating decision maker (CODM) as being part of a single industry segment: the design, development, marketing and sales of Enterprise Information Management (EIM) software and solutions. Therefore, our goodwill impairment assessment is based on the allocation of goodwill to a single reporting unit.
We perform a qualitative assessment to test our reporting unit's goodwill for impairment. Based on our qualitative assessment, if we determine that the fair value of our reporting unit is more likely than not (i.e., a likelihood of more than 50 percent) to be less than its carrying amount, the twosecond step of the impairment test is performed. In the firstsecond step of the impairment test, we compare the fair value of our reporting unit to its carrying value. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is not considered impaired and we are not required to perform further testing. If the carrying value of the net assets of our reporting unit exceeds its fair value, then we must perform the second step of the two step impairment test in order to determine the implied fair value of our reporting unit's goodwill. If the carrying value our reporting unit's goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, then an impairment loss equal to the difference, but not exceeding the total carrying value of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit, would be recorded.
Our annual impairment analysis of goodwill was performed as of April 1, 2019. Our qualitative assessment indicated that there were no indications of impairment and therefore there was no impairment of goodwill required to be recorded for Fiscal 2019 (no impairments were recorded for Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017).
Acquired intangibles
In accordance with business combinations accounting, we allocate the purchase price of acquired companies to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. Such valuations may require management to make significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets. Acquired intangiblesintangible assets typically consist of acquired technology and customer relationships associated with various acquisitions.
Acquired technologyIn valuing our acquired intangible assets, we may make assumptions and estimates based in part on information obtained from the management of the acquired company, which may make our assumptions and estimates inherently uncertain. Examples of critical estimates we may make in valuing certain of the intangible assets that we acquire include, but are not limited to:
future expected cash flows of our individual revenue streams;
historical and expected customer attrition rates and anticipated growth in revenue from acquired customers;
the expected use of the acquired assets; and
discount rates.

As a result of the judgments that need to be made, we obtain the assistance of independent valuation firms. We complete these assessments as soon as practical after the closing dates. Any excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the identifiable net assets acquired is initially recorded atas goodwill.
Although we believe the assumptions and estimates of fair value based on the present value of the estimated net future income-producing capabilities of software products acquired on acquisitions. We amortize acquired technology over its estimated useful life on a straight-line basis.
Customer relationships represent relationships that we have with customersmade in the past have been reasonable and appropriate, they are based in part on historical experience and information obtained from the management of the acquired companies and are either based upon contractual or legal rights or are considered separable; that is, capable of being separated from the acquired entityinherently uncertain and being sold, transferred, licensed, rented or exchanged. These customer relationships are initially recorded at their fair value based on the present value of expected future cash flows. We amortize customer relationships on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives.
We continually evaluate the remaining estimated useful life of our intangible assets being amortizedsubject to determine whetherrefinement. Unanticipated events and circumstances warrantmay occur that may affect the accuracy or validity of such assumptions, estimates or actual results. As a revisionresult, during the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date, we record adjustments to the remaining period of amortization.
Restructuring charges
We record restructuring charges relating to contractual lease obligationsassets acquired and other exit costs in accordance with ASC Topic 420, “Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations” (Topic 420). Topic 420 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized and measured initially at its fair value in the period in which the liability is incurred. In order to incur a liability pursuant to Topic 420, our management must have established and approved a plan of restructuring in sufficient detail. A liability for a cost associated with involuntary termination benefits is recorded when benefits have been communicated and a liability for a cost to terminate an operating lease or other contract is incurred when the contract has been terminated in accordanceliabilities assumed with the contract terms or we have ceased usingcorresponding offset to goodwill, if the right conveyed bychanges are related to conditions that existed at the contract, such as vacating a leased facility.
The recognition of restructuring charges requires us to make certain judgments regarding the nature, timing and amount associated with the planned restructuring activities, including estimating sub-lease income and the net recoverable amount of equipment to be disposed of. At the end of each reporting period, we evaluate the appropriatenesstime of the remaining accrued balances.
Foreign currency
Our Consolidated Financial Statements are presented in U.S. dollars. In general,acquisition. Upon the functional currency of our subsidiaries is the local currency. For each subsidiary, assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S dollars at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet dates and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates prevailing during the monthconclusion of the transaction. The effectmeasurement period or final determination of foreign currency translationthe values of assets acquired or liabilities assumed, whichever comes first, any subsequent adjustments, not affecting net incomebased on events that occurred subsequent to the acquisition date, are includedrecorded in Shareholders' equity under the “Cumulative translation adjustment” account as a componentour consolidated statements of “Accumulated other comprehensive income”. Transactional foreign currency gains (losses) included in the Consolidated Statements of Income under the line item “Other income (expense) net” for Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014 were $(1.9) million, $(31.0) million and $4.0 million, respectively.income.
Income taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes” (Topic 740). Deferred tax assets and liabilities arise from temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the Consolidated Financial Statements that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years. These temporary differences are measured using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce deferred tax assets to the extent that we

consider it is more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will not be realized. In determining the valuation allowance, we consider factors such as the reversal of deferred income tax liabilities, projected taxable income, and the character of income tax assets and tax planning strategies. A change to these factors could impact the estimated valuation allowance and income tax expense.

We account for our uncertain tax provisions by using a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than not, based solely on the technical merits, that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the appropriate amount of the benefit to recognize. The amount of benefit to recognize is measured as the maximum amount which is more likely than not to be realized. The tax position is derecognized when it is no longer more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit. On subsequent recognition and measurement the maximum amount which is more likely than not to be recognized at each reporting date will represent the Company's best estimate, given the information available at the reporting date, although the outcome of the tax position is not absolute or final. We recognize both accrued interest and penalties related to liabilities for income taxes within the "Provision for Income Taxes"(recovery of) income taxes" line of our Consolidated Statements of Income.Income
See Note 2 "Accounting PoliciesThe Company’s tax positions are subject to audit by local taxing authorities across multiple global subsidiaries and Recent Accounting Pronouncements"the resolution of such audits may span multiple years. Since tax law is complex and often subject to varied interpretations, it is uncertain whether some of the Company’s tax positions will be sustained upon audit. Our assumptions, judgments and estimates relative to the current provision for income taxes considers current tax laws, our interpretations of current tax laws and possible outcomes of current and future audits conducted by domestic and foreign tax authorities. While we believe the assumptions and estimates that we have made are reasonable, such assumptions and estimates could have a material impact to our Consolidated Financial Statements includedupon ultimate resolution of the tax positions. For additional details, please see note 14 "Income Taxes" elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more details.10-K.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following tables provide a detailed analysis of our results of operations and financial condition. For each of the periods indicated below, we present our revenues by product type, revenues by major geography, cost of revenues by product type, total gross margin, total operating margin, gross margin by product type, and their corresponding percentage of total revenue. In addition, we provide Non-GAAP measures for the periods discussed in order to provide additional information to investors that we believe will be useful as this presentation is in line with how our management assesses our Company's performance. See "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" below for a reconciliation of GAAP-based measures to Non-GAAP-based measures.

Summary of Results of Operations
 Year Ended June 30,Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands) 2016 Change increase (decrease) 2015 Change increase (decrease) 20142019 Change increase (decrease) 2018 Change increase (decrease) 2017
Total Revenues by Product Type:                   
License $283,710
 $(10,556) $294,266
 $(11,580) $305,846
$428,092
 $(9,420) $437,512
 $68,368
 $369,144
Cloud services and subscriptions 601,018
 (4,291) 605,309
 231,909
 373,400
907,812
 78,844
 828,968
 123,473
 705,495
Customer support 746,409
 14,612
 731,797
 24,773
 707,024
1,247,915
 15,411
 1,232,504
 251,402
 981,102
Professional service and other 193,091
 (27,454) 220,545
 (17,884) 238,429
284,936
 (31,321) 316,257
 80,941
 235,316
Total revenues 1,824,228
 (27,689) 1,851,917
 227,218
 1,624,699
2,868,755
 53,514
 2,815,241
 524,184
 2,291,057
Total Cost of Revenues 574,000
 (24,409) 598,409
 87,667
 510,742
930,703
 (20,296) 950,999
 189,442
 761,557
Total GAAP-based Gross Profit 1,250,228
 (3,280) 1,253,508
 139,551
 1,113,957
1,938,052
 73,810
 1,864,242
 334,742
 1,529,500
Total GAAP-based Gross Margin % 68.5%   67.7%   68.6%67.6%   66.2%   66.8%
Total GAAP-based Operating Expenses 881,665
 (23,132) 904,797
 91,368
 813,429
1,371,042
 13,493
 1,357,549
 182,749
 1,174,800
Total GAAP-based Income from Operations $368,563
 $19,852
 $348,711
 $48,183
 $300,528
$567,010
 $60,317
 $506,693
 $151,993
 $354,700
                   
% Revenues by Product Type:                   
License 15.6%   15.9%   18.8%14.9%   15.6%   16.1%
Cloud services and subscriptions 32.9%   32.7%   23.0%31.7%   29.4%   30.8%
Customer support 40.9%   39.5%   43.5%43.5%   43.8%   42.8%
Professional service and other 10.6%   11.9%   14.7%9.9%   11.2%   10.3%
                   
Total Cost of Revenues by Product Type:                   
License $10,296
 $(2,603) $12,899
 $(262) $13,161
$14,347
 $654
 $13,693
 $61
 $13,632
Cloud services and subscriptions 244,021
 6,711
 237,310
 95,117
 142,193
383,993
 19,833
 364,160
 64,310
 299,850
Customer support 89,861
 (4,595) 94,456
 (1,612) 96,068
124,343
 (9,546) 133,889
 11,324
 122,565
Professional service and other 155,584
 (17,158) 172,742
 (16,661) 189,403
224,635
 (28,754) 253,389
 58,435
 194,954
Amortization of acquired technology-based intangible assets 74,238
 (6,764) 81,002
 11,085
 69,917
183,385
 (2,483) 185,868
 55,312
 130,556
Total cost of revenues $574,000
 $(24,409) $598,409
 $87,667
 $510,742
$930,703
 $(20,296) $950,999
 $189,442
 $761,557
                   
% GAAP-based Gross Margin by Product Type:                   
License 96.4%   95.6%   95.7%96.6%   96.9%   96.3%
Cloud services and subscriptions 59.4%   60.8%   61.9%57.7%   56.1%   57.5%
Customer support 88.0%   87.1%   86.4%90.0%   89.1%   87.5%
Professional service and other 19.4%   21.7%   20.6%21.2%   19.9%   17.2%
                   
Total Revenues by Geography:(1)                   
Americas (1) $1,049,099
 $13,794
 $1,035,305
 $161,885
 $873,420
EMEA (2) 610,947
 (27,351) 638,298
 50,402
 587,896
Asia Pacific (3) 164,182
 (14,132) 178,314
 14,931
 163,383
Americas (2)
$1,683,282
 $63,648
 $1,619,634
 $262,215
 $1,357,419
EMEA (3)
920,422
 2,655
 917,767
 197,207
 720,560
Asia Pacific (4)
265,051
 (12,789) 277,840
 64,762
 213,078
Total revenues $1,824,228
 $(27,689) $1,851,917
 $227,218
 $1,624,699
$2,868,755
 $53,514
 $2,815,241
 $524,184
 $2,291,057
                   
% Revenues by Geography:                   
Americas (1) 57.5%   55.9%   53.8%
EMEA (2) 33.5%   34.5%   36.2%
Asia Pacific (3) 9.0%   9.6%   10.0%
Americas (2)
58.7%   57.5%   59.2%
EMEA (3)
32.1%   32.6%   31.5%
Asia Pacific (4)
9.2%   9.9%   9.3%

  Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands) 2016   2015   2014
GAAP-based gross margin 68.5%   67.7%   68.6%
GAAP-based operating margin 20.2%   18.8%   18.5%
GAAP-based EPS, diluted $2.33
   $1.91
   $1.81
Non-GAAP-based gross margin (4) 72.8%   72.2%   73.0%
Non-GAAP-based operating margin (4) 33.8%   30.9%   30.9%
Non-GAAP-based EPS, diluted (4) $3.54
   $3.46
   $3.37
 Year Ended June 30,
 2019   2018   2017
GAAP-based gross margin67.6%   66.2%   66.8%
GAAP-based EPS, diluted$1.06
   $0.91
   $4.01
Net income, attributable to OpenText$285,501
   $242,224
 
 $1,025,659
Non-GAAP-based gross margin (5)
74.1%   73.0%   72.6%
Non-GAAP-based EPS, diluted (5)
$2.76
   $2.56
   $2.02
Adjusted EBITDA (5)
$1,100,291
   $1,020,351
   $794,285
(1)Total revenues by geography are determined based on the location of our end customer.
(2)Americas consists of countries in North, Central and South America.
(2)(3)EMEA primarily consists of countries in Europe, the Middle East and Africa.
(3)(4)Asia Pacific primarily consists of the countries Japan, Australia, China, Korea, Philippines, Singapore and New Zealand.
(4)(5)See "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" (discussed later in thethis MD&A) for a reconciliationdefinitions and reconciliations of Non-GAAP-basedGAAP-based measures to GAAP-basedNon-GAAP-based measures.
Revenues, Cost of Revenues and Gross Margin by Product Type
1)    License Revenues:License:
License revenues consistOur license revenue can be broadly categorized as perpetual licenses, term licenses and subscription licenses, all of fees earned fromwhich are deployed on the licensing of software products to customers.customer’s premises (on-premise). Our license revenues are impacted by the strength of general economic and industry conditions, the competitive strength of our software products, and our acquisitions. Cost of license revenues consists primarily of royalties payable to third parties.
  Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands) 2016 Change increase (decrease) 2015 Change increase (decrease) 2014
License Revenues:          
Americas $131,638
 $(3,624) $135,262
 $(6,302) $141,564
EMEA 125,924
 (726) 126,650
 1,385
 125,265
Asia Pacific 26,148
 (6,206) 32,354
 (6,663) 39,017
Total License Revenues 283,710
 (10,556) 294,266
 (11,580) 305,846
Cost of License Revenues 10,296
 (2,603) 12,899
 (262) 13,161
GAAP-based License Gross Profit $273,414
 $(7,953) $281,367
 $(11,318) $292,685
GAAP-based License Gross Margin % 96.4%   95.6%   95.7%
           
% License Revenues by Geography: 
          
Americas 46.4%   46.0%   46.3%
EMEA 44.4%   43.0%   41.0%
Asia Pacific 9.2%   11.0%   12.7%
Fiscal 2016 Compared to Fiscal 2015
 Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands)2019 Change increase (decrease) 2018 Change increase (decrease) 2017
License Revenues:         
Americas$215,871
 $8,216
 $207,655
 $29,257
 $178,398
EMEA163,622
 (7,009) 170,631
 23,788
 146,843
Asia Pacific48,599
 (10,627) 59,226
 15,323
 43,903
Total License Revenues428,092
 (9,420) 437,512
 68,368
 369,144
Cost of License Revenues14,347
 654
 13,693
 61
 13,632
GAAP-based License Gross Profit$413,745
 $(10,074) $423,819
 $68,307
 $355,512
GAAP-based License Gross Margin %96.6%   96.9%   96.3%
          
% License Revenues by Geography: 
         
Americas50.4%   47.5%   48.3%
EMEA38.2%   39.0%   39.8%
Asia Pacific11.4%   13.5%   11.9%
License revenues decreased by $10.6$9.4 million inclusiveor 2.2% during the year ended June 30, 2019 as compared to the prior fiscal year; up 0.4% after factoring the impact of the negative impact$11.2 million of foreign exchange of approximately $15.1 million.rate changes. Geographically, the overall decreasechange was attributable to an increase in Americas of $8.2 million, offset by a decrease in Asia Pacific of $6.2 million, a decrease in Americas of $3.6$10.6 million and a decrease in EMEA of $0.7$7.0 million. The number of
During Fiscal 2019, we closed 153 license deals greater than $0.5 million, that closed during Fiscal 2016 was 78 deals, of which 3449 deals were greater than $1.0 million, and is inclusivecontributing approximately $144.1 million of a patent infringement settlement,license revenues. This was compared to 78140 deals ingreater than $0.5 million during Fiscal 2015,2018, of which 3058 deals were greater than $1.0 million. License revenue, as a proportionmillion, contributing $152.2 million of our total revenues, remained stable at approximately 16%.license revenues.
Cost of license revenues decreasedincreased by $2.6$0.7 million primarilyduring the year ended June 30, 2019 as a result of lower third party technology costs. Overall,compared to the prior fiscal year. The gross margin percentage on license revenues remained stable at approximately 96%97%.

Fiscal 2015 ComparedFor illustrative purposes only, had we accounted for revenues under proforma Topic 605, license revenues would have been $390.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2019, which would have been lower by approximately $47.1 million or 10.8% as compared to Fiscal 2014
License revenues decreasedthe prior fiscal year; and would have been lower by $11.68.4% after factoring the impact of $10.4 million inclusive of a negative impact of foreign exchange of approximately $20.2 million.rate changes. Geographically, the overall decrease waschange would have been attributable to a decrease in Americas of $17.7 million, a decrease in EMEA of $15.7 million and a decrease in Asia Pacific of $6.7$13.7 million.
The $37.7 million a decrease in Americas of $6.3 million, offset by an increase in EMEA of $1.4 million. The number ofdifference between license deals greater than $0.5 million that closed during Fiscal 2015 was 78 deals, compared to 77 deals in Fiscal 2014. License revenue, as a proportion of our total revenues decreased from 18.8% in Fiscal 2014 to 15.9% in Fiscal 2015 primarily as arecognized under Topic 606 and those proforma Topic 605 license revenues described above is the result of an increasing proportion in cloud servicestiming differences, where under Topic 605, revenues would have been deferred and subscriptions revenues.
Cost of licenserecognized over time, but under Topic 606 these revenues were relatively stable, with gross margin percentage remaining at approximately 96%.are recognized up front. For more details, see note 3 "Revenues" to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
2)    Cloud Services and Subscriptions:
Cloud services and subscriptionsubscriptions revenues consistare from hosting arrangements where in connection with the licensing of (i)software, the end user doesn’t take possession of the software, as a service offerings (ii) managed service arrangements and  (iii) subscription revenues relating to on premise offerings. These offerings allow our customers to make use of OpenText software, services and content over Internet enabled networks supported by OpenText data centers. These web applications allow customers to transmit a variety of content between various mediums and to securely manage enterprise information without the commitment of investing in related hardware infrastructure. Revenues are generated on several transactional usage-based models, are typically billed monthly in arrears, and can therefore fluctuatewell as from period to period. Certain service fees are occasionally charged to customize hosted software for some customers and are either amortized over the estimated customer life, in the case of setup fees, or recognized in the period they are provided.
In addition, we offerend-to-end fully outsourced business-to-business (B2B) integration solutions suchto our customers (collectively referred to as messaging services,cloud arrangements). The software application resides on our hardware or that of a third party, and the customer accesses and uses the software on an as-needed basis via an identified line. Our cloud arrangements can be broadly categorized as "platform as a service" (PaaS), "software as a service" (SaaS), cloud subscriptions and managed services. Messaging services allow for the automated and reliable exchange of electronic transaction information, such as purchase orders, invoices, shipment notices and other business documents, among businesses worldwide. Managed services provide an end-to-end fully outsourced B2B integration solution to our customers, including program implementation, operational management, and customer support. These services enable customers to effectively manage the flow of electronic transaction information with their trading partners and reduce the complexity of disparate standards and communication protocols. Revenues are primarily generated through transaction processing. Transaction processing fees are recurring in nature and are recognized on a per transaction basis in the period in which the related transactions are processed. Revenues from contracts with monthly, quarterly or annual minimum transaction levels are recognized based on the greater of the actual transactions or the specified contract minimum amounts during the relevant period. Customers who are not committed to multi-year contracts generally are under contracts for transaction processing solutions that automatically renew every month or year, depending on the terms of the specific contracts.
Cost of Cloud services and subscriptions revenues is comprised primarily of third party network usage fees, maintenance of in-house data hardware centers, technical support personnel-related costs, amortization of customer set up and implementation costs, and some third party royalty costs.
  Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands) 2016 Change increase (decrease) 2015 Change increase (decrease) 2014
Cloud Services and Subscriptions:          
Americas $398,713
 $4,242
 $394,471
 $146,716
 $247,755
EMEA 137,788
 (3,685) 141,473
 66,388
 75,085
Asia Pacific 64,517
 (4,848) 69,365
 18,805
 50,560
Total Cloud Services and Subscriptions Revenues 601,018
 (4,291) 605,309
 231,909
 373,400
Cost of Cloud Services and Subscriptions Revenues 244,021
 6,711
 237,310
 95,117
 142,193
GAAP-based Cloud Services and Subscriptions Gross Profit $356,997
 $(11,002) $367,999
 $136,792
 $231,207
GAAP-based Cloud Services and Subscriptions Gross Margin % 59.4%   60.8%   61.9%
           
% Cloud Services and Subscriptions Revenues by Geography:          
Americas 66.3%   65.2%   66.4%
EMEA 22.9%   23.4%   20.1%
Asia Pacific 10.8%   11.4%   13.5%

Fiscal 2016 Compared to Fiscal 2015
 Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands)2019 Change increase (decrease) 2018 Change increase (decrease) 2017
Cloud Services and Subscriptions:         
Americas$616,776
 $61,553
 $555,223
 $70,216
 $485,007
EMEA206,227
 14,707
 191,520
 40,673
 150,847
Asia Pacific84,809
 2,584
 82,225
 12,584
 69,641
Total Cloud Services and Subscriptions Revenues907,812
 78,844
 828,968
 123,473
 705,495
Cost of Cloud Services and Subscriptions Revenues383,993
 19,833
 364,160
 64,310
 299,850
GAAP-based Cloud Services and Subscriptions Gross Profit$523,819
 $59,011
 $464,808
 $59,163
 $405,645
GAAP-based Cloud Services and Subscriptions Gross Margin %57.7%   56.1%   57.5%
          
% Cloud Services and Subscriptions Revenues by Geography:         
Americas67.9%   67.0%   68.7%
EMEA22.7%   23.1%   21.4%
Asia Pacific9.4%   9.9%   9.9%
Cloud services and subscriptions revenues decreasedincreased by $4.3$78.8 million inclusiveor 9.5% during the year ended June 30, 2019 as compared to the prior fiscal year; up 10.8% after factoring the impact of the negative impact$10.8 million of foreign exchange of approximately $19.4 million.rate changes. Geographically, the overall change was attributable to a decrease in Asia Pacific of $4.8 million and a decrease in EMEA of $3.7 million, partially offset by an increase in Americas of $4.2$61.6 million, an increase in EMEA of $14.7 million, and an increase in Asia Pacific of $2.6 million.
The number of Cloud services deals greater than $1.0 million that closed during Fiscal 20162019 was 3146 deals, compared to 31 dealsconsistent with that in Fiscal 2015.2018.
Cost of Cloud services and subscriptions revenues increased by $6.7$19.8 million during the year ended June 30, 2019 as compared to the prior fiscal year, due to an increase in labour-related costs of approximately $12.5$19.1 million and an increase in sales tax liabilities of approximately $0.7 million resulting from the impact of certain adjustments that occurred primarily in Fiscal 2015. These increases were partially offset by a reduction in third party network usage fees of approximately $6.5$1.3 million. These were partially offset by a decrease in other miscellaneous costs of $0.6 million. The increase in labour-related costs was primarily due to increased headcount from recent acquisitions.
Overall, the gross margin percentage on Cloud services and subscriptions revenues decreased slightlyincreased to approximately 59%58% from approximately 61%56%.
Fiscal 2015 Compared to Fiscal 2014
For illustrative purposes only, had we accounted for revenues under proforma Topic 605, Cloud services and subscriptions revenues increasedwould have been $901.5 million for the year ended June 30, 2019, which would have been higher by $231.9approximately $72.5 million which is inclusive ofor 8.7% as compared to the full yearprior fiscal year; and would have been up 10.1% after factoring the impact of our acquisition of GXS Group Inc. (GXS) and a negative impact of $18.0$11.0 million of foreign exchange.exchange rate changes. Geographically, the overall increase waschange would have been attributable to

an increase in Americas of $146.7$56.4 million, and an increase in EMEA of $66.4$12.4 million and an increase in Asia Pacific of $18.8$3.7 million. There were 31 Cloud services deals greater than $1.0
The $6.4 million that closed during Fiscal 2015.
Cost ofdifference between cloud service and subscription revenues recognized under Topic 606 and those proforma Topic 605 cloud services and subscriptions revenues increased by $95.1 million,described above is primarily duethe result of timing differences on professional services related to cloud contracts, where under Topic 605, revenues would have been deferred over the full year impact fromestimated life of the contract, but under Topic 606 these revenues are recognized as services are performed. For more details, see note 3 "Revenues" to our acquisition of GXS and higher revenue attainment, partially offset by a reduction in sales tax liabilities. As a result, the gross margin percentage on Cloud services and subscriptions revenue decreased slightly to approximately 61% from approximately 62%.Consolidated Financial Statements.
3)    Customer Support Revenues:Support:
Customer support revenues consist of revenues from our customer support and maintenance agreements. These agreements allow our customers to receive technical support, enhancements and upgrades to new versions of our software products when and if available. Customer support revenues are generated from support and maintenance relating to current year sales of software products and from the renewal of existing maintenance agreements for software licenses sold in prior periods. Therefore, changes in Customer support revenues do not always correlate directly to the changes in license revenues from period to period. The terms of support and maintenance agreements are typically twelve months, and are renewable, generally on an annual basis, at the option of the customer. Our management reviews our Customer support renewal rates on a quarterly basis and we use these rates as a method of monitoring our customer service performance. For the quarter ended June 30, 2019, our Customer support renewal rate was approximately 91%, stable compared with customerthe Customer support renewal options. rate during the quarter ended June 30, 2018.
Cost of Customer support revenues is comprised primarily of technical support personnel and related costs, as well as third party royalty costs.
  Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands) 2016 Change increase (decrease) 2015 Change increase (decrease) 2014
Customer Support Revenues:          
Americas $428,907
 $25,718
 $403,189
 $29,658
 $373,531
EMEA 260,126
 (10,696) 270,822
 (9,035) 279,857
Asia Pacific 57,376
 (410) 57,786
 4,150
 53,636
Total Customer Support Revenues 746,409
 14,612
 731,797
 24,773
 707,024
Cost of Customer Support Revenues 89,861
 (4,595) 94,456
 (1,612) 96,068
GAAP-based Customer Support Gross Profit $656,548
 $19,207
 $637,341
 $26,385
 $610,956
GAAP-based Customer Support Gross Margin % 88.0%   87.1%   86.4%
           
% Customer Support Revenues by Geography:          
Americas 57.5%   55.1%   52.8%
EMEA 34.9%   37.0%   39.6%
Asia Pacific 7.6%   7.9%   7.6%

Fiscal 2016 Compared to Fiscal 2015
 Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands)2019 Change increase (decrease) 2018 Change increase (decrease) 2017
Customer Support Revenues:         
Americas$718,209
 $12,924
 $705,285
 $122,870
 $582,415
EMEA427,712
 3,939
 423,773
 103,145
 320,628
Asia Pacific101,994
 (1,452) 103,446
 25,387
 78,059
Total Customer Support Revenues1,247,915
 15,411
 1,232,504
 251,402
 981,102
Cost of Customer Support Revenues124,343
 (9,546) 133,889
 11,324
 122,565
GAAP-based Customer Support Gross Profit$1,123,572
 $24,957
 $1,098,615
 $240,078
 $858,537
GAAP-based Customer Support Gross Margin %90.0%   89.1%   87.5%
          
% Customer Support Revenues by Geography:         
Americas57.6%   57.2%   59.4%
EMEA34.3%   34.4%   32.7%
Asia Pacific8.1%   8.4%   7.9%
Customer support revenues increased by $14.6$15.4 million which is inclusiveor 1.3% during the year ended June 30, 2019 as compared to the prior fiscal year; up 3.1% after factoring the impact of the negative impact$23.2 million of foreign exchange of approximately $32.7 million.rate changes. Geographically, the overall increasechange was attributable to an increase in Americas of $25.7$12.9 million, an increase in EMEA of $3.9 million, partially offset by a decrease in EMEA of $10.7 million and a decrease in Asia Pacific of $0.4$1.5 million.
Cost of Customer support revenues decreased by $4.6$9.5 million primarilyduring the year ended June 30, 2019 as compared to the prior fiscal year, due to a reductiondecrease in labour-related costs of approximately $3.5$9.9 million, and a reductionpartially offset by an increase in the installed baseother miscellaneous costs of third party products of approximately $1.2$0.4 million. As a result,Overall, the gross margin percentage on Customer support revenues increased slightly to approximately 88%90% from approximately 87%89%.
Fiscal 2015 Compared to Fiscal 2014
CustomerFor illustrative purposes only, had we accounted for revenues under proforma Topic 605, customer support revenues increasedwould have been $1,246.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2019, which would have been higher by $24.8approximately $13.8 million which is inclusiveor 1.1% as compared to the prior fiscal year; and would have been up 3.0% after factoring the impact of the negative impact$23.3 million of foreign exchange of approximately $33.7 million.rate changes. Geographically, the overall increase waschange would have been attributable to an increase in Americas of $29.7$13.0 million and an increase in Asia PacificEMEA of $4.2$2.7 million, partially offset by a decrease in EMEAAsia Pacific of $9.0$1.9 million.
Cost of customer support revenues were relatively stable during Fiscal 2015. However, as a result of a reduction in technical support personnel related costs, the gross margin percentage on customer support revenues increased slightly to approximately 87% from approximately 86% in Fiscal 2014.
4)    Professional Service and Other Revenues:Other:
Professional service and other revenues consist of revenues from consulting contracts and contracts to provide implementation, training and integration services (professional services). Other revenues consist of hardware revenues. These revenues, which are grouped within the “Professional service and other” category because they are relatively immaterial to our service revenues. Professional services are typically performed after the purchase of new software licenses. Professional service and other revenues can vary from period to period based on the type of engagements as well as those implementations that are assumed by our partner network.
Cost of professional service and other revenues consists primarily of the costs of providing integration, configuration and training with respect to our various software products. The most significant components of these costs are personnel-related expenses, travel costs and third party subcontracting.
  Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands) 2016 Change increase (decrease) 2015 Change increase (decrease) 2014
Professional Service and Other Revenues:          
Americas $89,841
 $(12,543) $102,384
 $(8,184) $110,568
EMEA 87,109
 (12,244) 99,353
 (8,338) 107,691
Asia Pacific 16,141
 (2,667) 18,808
 (1,362) 20,170
Total Professional Service and Other Revenues 193,091
 (27,454) 220,545
 (17,884) 238,429
Cost of Professional Service and Other Revenues 155,584
 (17,158) 172,742
 (16,661) 189,403
GAAP-based Professional Service and Other Gross Profit $37,507
 $(10,296) $47,803
 $(1,223) $49,026
GAAP-based Professional Service and Other Gross Margin % 19.4%   21.7%   20.6%
           
% Professional Service and Other Revenues by Geography:          
Americas 46.5%   46.4%   46.4%
EMEA 45.1%   45.0%   45.2%
Asia Pacific 8.4%   8.6%   8.4%
Fiscal 2016 Compared to Fiscal 2015
 Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands)2019 Change increase (decrease) 2018 Change increase (decrease) 2017
Professional Service and Other Revenues:         
Americas$132,426
 $(19,045) $151,471
 $39,872
 $111,599
EMEA122,861
 (8,982) 131,843
 29,601
 102,242
Asia Pacific29,649
 (3,294) 32,943
 11,468
 21,475
Total Professional Service and Other Revenues284,936
 (31,321) 316,257
 80,941
 235,316
Cost of Professional Service and Other Revenues224,635
 (28,754) 253,389
 58,435
 194,954
GAAP-based Professional Service and Other Gross Profit$60,301
 $(2,567) $62,868
 $22,506
 $40,362
GAAP-based Professional Service and Other Gross Margin %21.2%   19.9%   17.2%
          
% Professional Service and Other Revenues by Geography:         
Americas46.5%   47.9%   47.4%
EMEA43.1%   41.7%   43.4%
Asia Pacific10.4%   10.4%   9.2%
Professional service and other revenues decreased by $27.5$31.3 million or 9.9% during the year ended June 30, 2019 as compared to the prior fiscal year; down 7.4% after factoring the impact of $8.1 million of which approximately $12.5 million was due to the negative impact of foreign exchange.exchange rate changes. Geographically, the overall decreasechange was attributable to a decrease in Americas of $12.5$19.0 million, a decrease in EMEA of $12.2$9.0 million and a decrease in Asia Pacific of $2.7$3.3 million.
Cost of Professional service and other revenues decreased by $17.2$28.8 million primarilyduring the year ended June 30, 2019 as compared to the prior fiscal year as a result of a reductiondecrease in labour-related costs of approximately $16.2$29.0 million and lower revenue attainment. Overall, the gross margin percentage on Professional service and other revenues decreased to approximately 19%resulting primarily from approximately 22%.

Fiscal 2015 Compared to Fiscal 2014
Professional service and other revenues decreased by $17.9 million, of which approximately $12.2 million was due to the negative impact of foreign exchange. Geographically, the overall decrease was attributable to a decrease in EMEA of $8.3 million, a decrease in Americas of $8.2 million, and a decrease in Asia Pacific of $1.4 million.
Cost of Professional service and other revenues decreased by $16.7 million. This was primarily due to lower labour related expenses associated with lower revenue attainment and a reduction in the use of subcontractors. As a result,external labour resources, partially offset by an increase in other miscellaneous costs of $0.2 million.
Overall, the gross margin percentage on Professional service and other revenues increased to approximately 22%21% from approximately 21%20%. This is the result of effectively executing our strategy of optimizing margins by being selective about the professional service engagements we accept.
Professional service and other revenues under proforma Topic 605 were not materially different from those under Topic 606 as discussed above.
Amortization of Acquired Technology-based Intangible Assets
  Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands) 2016 Change increase (decrease) 2015 Change increase (decrease) 2014
Amortization of acquired technology-based intangible assets $74,238
 $(6,764) $81,002
 $11,085
 $69,917
Fiscal 2016 Compared to Fiscal 2015
 Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands)2019 Change increase (decrease) 2018 Change increase (decrease) 2017
Amortization of acquired technology-based intangible assets$183,385
 $(2,483) $185,868
 $55,312
 $130,556
Amortization of acquired technology-based intangible assets decreased during the year ended June 30, 2019 by $6.8 million.$2.5 million, as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year. This was due to the technology-baseda reduction of $20.6 million, relating to intangible assets pertaining tofrom certain previous acquisitions becoming fully amortized. This wasamortized, partially offset by the impactan increase in amortization of new$18.1 million, relating to newly acquired technology-based intangible assets from our recent acquisitions of CEM Business, ANX, Daegis, ActuateCatalyst and

Liaison in Fiscal 2019, as well as Hightail, Guidance Software Inc. (Guidance), and Covisint Corporation (Actuate) and Informative Graphics Corporation (IGC).
(Covisint), which were acquired during Fiscal 2015 Compared to Fiscal 2014
Amortization of acquired technology-based intangible assets increased by $11.1 million, primarily due to the impact of new acquired technology-based intangible assets from our acquisitions of Actuate, IGC, and GXS. This was partially offset by the technology-based intangible assets pertaining to previous acquisitions becoming fully amortized.2018.
Operating Expenses
 Year Ended June 30,Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands) 2016 Change increase (decrease) 2015 Change increase (decrease) 20142019 Change increase (decrease) 2018 Change increase (decrease) 2017
Research and development $194,057
 $(2,434) $196,491
 $19,657
 $176,834
$321,836
 $(1,073) $322,909
 $41,694
 $281,215
Sales and marketing 344,235
 (29,375) 373,610
 26,669
 346,941
518,035
 (11,106) 529,141
 84,687
 444,454
General and administrative 140,397
 (22,331) 162,728
 20,648
 142,080
207,909
 2,682
 205,227
 34,874
 170,353
Depreciation 54,929
 4,023
 50,906
 15,669
 35,237
97,716
 10,773
 86,943
 22,625
 64,318
Amortization of acquired customer-based intangible assets 113,201
 4,962
 108,239
 27,216
 81,023
189,827
 5,709
 184,118
 33,276
 150,842
Special charges 34,846
 22,023
 12,823
 (18,491) 31,314
Special charges (recoveries)35,719
 6,508
 29,211
 (34,407) 63,618
Total operating expenses $881,665
 $(23,132) $904,797
 $91,368
 $813,429
$1,371,042
 $13,493
 $1,357,549
 $182,749
 $1,174,800
                   
% of Total Revenues:                   
Research and development 10.6%   10.6%   10.9%11.2%   11.5%   12.3%
Sales and marketing 18.9%   20.2%   21.4%18.1%   18.8%   19.4%
General and administrative 7.7%   8.8%   8.7%7.2%   7.3%   7.4%
Depreciation 3.0%   2.7%   2.2%3.4%   3.1%   2.8%
Amortization of acquired customer-based intangible assets 6.2%   5.8%   5.0%6.6%   6.5%   6.6%
Special charges 1.9%   0.7%   1.9%
Special charges (recoveries)1.2%   1.0%   2.8%
Research and development expenses consist primarily of payroll and payroll-related benefits expenses, contracted research and development expenses, and facility costs. Research and development assists with organic growth and improves

product stability and functionality, and accordingly, we dedicate extensive efforts to update and upgrade our product offerings. The primary driver is typically budgeted software upgrades and software development.
  Change between Fiscal
 (In thousands)
 2016 and 2015 2015 and 2014
Payroll and payroll-related benefits $(696) $19,828
Contract labour and consulting (1,721) (2,485)
Share-based compensation 260
 100
Travel and communication (266) (1,459)
Facilities 151
 3,883
Other miscellaneous (162) (210)
Total year-over-year change in research and development expenses $(2,434) $19,657
Fiscal 2016 Compared to Fiscal 2015
 Change between Fiscal
increase (decrease)
 (In thousands)
2019 and 2018 2018 and 2017
Payroll and payroll-related benefits$12,629
 $39,119
Contract labour and consulting(6,791) (3,899)
Share-based compensation(385) (1,490)
Travel and communication(588) (343)
Facilities(4,775) 7,834
Other miscellaneous(1,163) 473
Total change in research and development expenses$(1,073) $41,694
Research and development expenses decreased by $2.4$1.1 million during the year ended June 30, 2019 as compared to the prior fiscal year. This was primarily due to a decreasereduction in Contractcontract labour and consulting expenses of $1.7 million resulting from continued efforts to reduce the usage of external services. Additionally, payroll and payroll-related benefits decreased by $0.7$6.8 million and travel and communication expense decreased by $0.3 million. These were partially offset by a $0.2 million increasereduction in the use of facility and related resources.expenses of $4.8 million, partially offset by an increase in payroll and payroll-related benefits of $12.6 million. The increase in payroll and payroll-related benefits was driven primarily by increased headcount from recent acquisitions. Overall, our research and development expenses, as a percentage of total revenues, have remained stable at approximately 11%. compared to prior fiscal year.
Our research and development labour resources increased by 93336 employees, from 2,0753,331 employees at June 30, 20152018 to 2,1683,667 employees at June 30, 2016. Included in this increase are 86 employees from acquisitions that occurred in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2016, which did not have a material impact on our research and development expenses in Fiscal 2016.2019.
Fiscal 2015 Compared to Fiscal 2014
Research and development expenses increased by $19.7 million. Payroll and payroll-related benefits increased by $19.8 million and the use of facility and related resources increased by $3.9 million, primarily as a result of the acquisitions of GXS in the third quarter of Fiscal 2014 and Actuate in the third quarter of Fiscal 2015. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in contract labour and consulting expenses of $2.5 million, resulting from continued efforts to reduce the usage of external services and replace them with internal resources, and a $1.5 million reduction in travel and communication expenses. Overall, our research and development expenses, as a percentage of total revenues, have remained relatively stable at approximately 11%.
Our research and development labour resources increased by 203 employees, from 1,872 employees at June 30, 2014 to 2,075 employees at June 30, 2015.
Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of personnel expenses and costs associated with advertising, marketing events and trade shows.
  Change between Fiscal
(In thousands) 2016 and 2015 2015 and 2014
Payroll and payroll-related benefits $(15,657) $10,550
Commissions (6,635) 9,802
Contract labour and consulting (303) (196)
Share-based compensation 2,072
 2,676
Travel and communication (4,964) (2,727)
Marketing expenses (3,307) 2,290
Facilities (786) 124
Other miscellaneous 205
 4,150
Total year-over-year change in sales and marketing expenses $(29,375) $26,669

Fiscal 2016 Compared to Fiscal 2015
 Change between Fiscal
increase (decrease)
(In thousands)2019 and 2018 2018 and 2017
Payroll and payroll-related benefits$(48) $48,717
Commissions(6,588) 16,993
Contract labour and consulting(871) 609
Share-based compensation(752) (454)
Travel and communication(1,113) 271
Marketing expenses(5,742) 3,880
Facilities808
 8,373
Bad debt expense3,519
 4,013
Other miscellaneous(319) 2,285
Total change in sales and marketing expenses$(11,106) $84,687
Sales and marketing expenses decreased by $29.4 million.$11.1 million during the year ended June 30, 2019 as compared to the prior fiscal year. This was primarily due to (i) a $15.7 million decrease in payroll and payroll-related benefits, a $6.6 million decrease in commissions expense thatof $6.6 million, of which approximately $8.9 million is primarilythe net result of the Company capitalizing more commission expense under Topic 606, whereas previously, under Topic 605, such costs would have been expensed as incurred, (ii) a decrease in connection with lower revenues,marketing expenses of $5.7 million and (iii) a $5.0 million decrease in travel and communication expenses and a $3.3 million decrease in marketing expenses.of $1.1 million. These decreases were partially offset by a $2.1 million increase in share-based compensation expense. Overall, our sales and marketing expenses, as a percentage of total revenues, decreased slightly to approximately 19% from approximately 20%.
Our sales and marketing labour resources decreased by 36 employees, from 1,478 employees at June 30, 2015 to 1,442 employees at June 30, 2016. Absent the impact of acquisitions in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2016, our sales and marketing labour resources decreased by 99 employees. The addition of 63 employees in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2016 from recent acquisitions did not have a material impact on our sales and marketing expenses in Fiscal 2016.
Fiscal 2015 Compared to Fiscal 2014
Sales and marketing expenses increased by $26.7 million. This was due to a $10.6 million increase in payroll and payroll-related benefits, primarily as a result of our acquisitions of GXS and Actuate, and a $9.8 million increase in commission benefits resulting from the increase in total revenues. Additionally, marketing expenses increased by $2.3 million, primarily on account of promotional activity for our global "sales kick off" event held during the first quarter of Fiscal 2015 and our annual user conference held during the second quarter of Fiscal 2015 and other miscellaneous expenses increased primarily due to(i) an increase in bad debt expense of $2.3 million. These increases$3.5 million as certain low dollar receivables were partially offset by a $2.7 million decrease in travel and communication expenses.provided for entirely as they became aged greater than one year. Overall, our sales and marketing expenses, as a percentage of total revenues, decreased to approximately 20%18% from approximately 21%19% in Fiscal 2014.the prior fiscal year.
Our sales and marketing labour resources increased by 83103 employees, from 1,3951,948 employees at June 30, 20142018 to 1,4782,051 employees at June 30, 2015.2019.
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of payroll and payroll related benefits expenses, related overhead, audit fees, other professional fees, contract labour and consulting expenses and public company costs.
  Change between Fiscal
(In thousands) 2016 and 2015 2015 and 2014
Payroll and payroll-related benefits $(9,688) $11,952
Contract labour and consulting 1,036
 (495)
Share-based compensation 1,239
 (1,802)
Travel and communication 2,674
 1,941
Facilities (907) (635)
Other miscellaneous (16,685) 9,687
Total year-over-year change in general and administrative expenses $(22,331) $20,648
Fiscal 2016 Compared to Fiscal 2015
 Change between Fiscal
increase (decrease)
(In thousands)2019 and 2018 2018 and 2017
Payroll and payroll-related benefits$4,089
 $22,908
Contract labour and consulting(618) (1,054)
Share-based compensation768
 (1,709)
Travel and communication794
 80
Facilities(4,537) 5,777
Other miscellaneous2,186
 8,872
Total change in general and administrative expenses$2,682
 $34,874
General and administrative expenses decreasedincreased by $22.3 million. Other$2.7 million during the year ended June 30, 2019 as compared to the prior fiscal year. This was primarily due to an increase in payroll and payroll-related benefits of $4.1 million and an increase in other miscellaneous expenses of $2.2 million, which includes professional fees such as legal, audit and tax related expenses, decreased by $16.7 million primarily on account of lower litigation expenses. Additionally, payroll and payroll-related benefits decreased by $9.7 million. These decreases were partially offset by a $2.7 million increase in travel and communications and a $1.2 million increase in share-based compensation. Overall, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of total revenue decreased slightly to approximately 8% from approximately 9%.
Our general and administrative labour resources increased by 38 employees, from 1,064 employees at June 30, 2015 to 1,102 employees at June 30, 2016. Included in this increase are 10 employees from acquisitions that occurredreduction in the fourth quarteruse of Fiscal 2016, which did not have a material impact onfacility and related expenses of $4.5 million. The remainder of the change was attributable to other activities associated with normal growth in our general and administrative expenses in Fiscal 2016.
Fiscal 2015 Compared to Fiscal 2014
General and administrative expenses increased by $20.6 million. Payroll and payroll-related benefits increased by $12.0 million and travel and communication expenses increased by $1.9 million, primarily as a result of our acquisitions of GXS and Actuate. Additionally, other miscellaneous expenses, which includes professional fees such as legal, audit and tax related

expenses, increased by $9.7 million primarily on account of litigation.business operations. Overall, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of total revenue, remained stable at approximately 9%7%.
Our general and administrative labour resources increased by 80119 employees, from 9841,501 employees at June 30, 20142018 to 1,0641,620 employees at June 30, 2015.2019.

Depreciation expenses:
  Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands) 2016 Change increase (decrease) 2015 Change increase (decrease) 2014
Depreciation $54,929
 $4,023
 $50,906
 $15,669
 $35,237
Fiscal 2016 Compared to Fiscal 2015
 Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands)2019 Change increase (decrease) 2018 Change increase (decrease) 2017
Depreciation$97,716
 $10,773
 $86,943
 $22,625
 $64,318
Depreciation expenses increased during the year ended June 30, 2019 by $4.0$10.8 million but remained relatively stableas compared to the prior fiscal year. Depreciation expense, as a percentage of total revenue, remained at approximately 3%.
Fiscal 2015 ComparedAmortization of acquired customer-based intangibleassets:
 Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands)2019 Change increase (decrease) 2018 Change increase (decrease) 2017
Amortization of acquired customer-based intangible assets$189,827
 $5,709
 $184,118
 $33,276
 $150,842
Amortization of acquired customer-based intangible assets increased during the year ended June 30, 2019 by $5.7 million as compared to Fiscal 2014
Depreciation expenses increased by $15.7 million.the prior fiscal year. This was primarily due to an increase in capital expenditures and the acquisitionsamortization of GXS, and Actuate. Depreciation as a percentage of total revenue increased slightly from approximately 2% in Fiscal 2014$12.6 million, relating to approximately 3% in Fiscal 2015.
Amortization of acquired customer-based intangibleassets:
  Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands) 2016 Change increase (decrease) 2015 Change increase (decrease) 2014
Amortization of acquired customer-based intangible assets $113,201
 $4,962
 $108,239
 $27,216
 $81,023
Fiscal 2016 Compared to Fiscal 2015
Acquired customer-based intangible assets amortization expense increased by $5.0 million. This was primarily due to the impact of newnewly acquired customer-based intangible assets from our recent acquisitions of CEM Business, ANX, Daegis, ActuateCatalyst and IGC. ThisLiaison in Fiscal 2019, as well as of Hightail, Guidance and Covisint, which were acquired during Fiscal 2018. The increase in amortization was partially offset by the customer-baseda reduction of $6.9 million, relating to intangible assets pertaining to previous acquisitions becoming fully amortized.
Fiscal 2015 Compared to Fiscal 2014
Acquired customer-based intangible assets amortization expense increased by $27.2 million. This was primarily due to our acquisitions of Actuate and IGC during the third quarter of Fiscal 2015 and GXS during the third quarter of Fiscal 2014, offset by the customer-based intangible assets pertaining tofrom certain previous acquisitions becoming fully amortized.
Special charges (recoveries):
Special chargestypically relate to amounts that we expect to pay in connection with restructuring plans relating to employee workforce reduction and abandonment of excess facilities, acquisition-related costs and other similar one-time charges.charges and recoveries. Generally, we implement such plans in the context of integrating acquired entities with existing OpenText operations with that of acquired entities.operations. Actions related to such restructuring plans are typically completed within a period of one year. In certain limited situations, if the planned activity does not need to be implemented, or an expense lower than anticipated is paid out, we record a recovery of the originally recorded expense to Special charges.
  Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands) 2016 Change increase (decrease) 2015 Change increase (decrease) 2014
Special charges (recoveries) $34,846
 $22,023
 $12,823
 $(18,491) $31,314

Fiscal 2016 Compared to Fiscal 2015
 Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands)2019 Change increase (decrease) 2018 Change increase (decrease) 2017
Special charges (recoveries)$35,719
 $6,508
 $29,211
 $(34,407) $63,618
Special charges increased by $22.0 million.$6.5 million during the year ended June 30, 2019 as compared to the prior fiscal year. This was primarily due to (i) an increase in restructuring activities of $8.5$11.5 million relating to costs incurred for a one-time ERP implementation project in which we are involved,and (ii) an increase of $6.7$2.8 million relating to a lower net impact of reversals from certain pre-acquisition sales and use tax liabilities and interest being settled, or in certain instances,cases, becoming statute barred, in the current fiscal year compared to the prior year, (iii) a net increase in restructuring charges of $4.1 million, (iv) an increase in acquisition related costs of $3.2 million, and (v) an increase of $4.8 million relating to post-acquisition integration costs necessary to streamline an acquired company into our operations and costs incurred to reorganize certain legal entities including consolidation of intellectual property.barred. These increases were partially offset by (i) a decreasereduction in expense of $2.9$5.3 million relating to the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the repayment of a $600 million credit facility (Term Loan A)in the third quarter of Fiscal 2015, and (ii) a $2.1 million decrease related to post-business combination compensation obligations associated with the acquisition of Actuate in the third quarter of Fiscal 2015.one-time system implementation costs. The remainder of the change is due to miscellaneous items.
Fiscal 2015 Compared to Fiscal 2014
Special charges decreased by $18.5 million. This was due to a $12.2 million decrease in restructuring activities, a $5.6 million decrease in acquisition related costs, and a $0.6 million decrease in other miscellaneous charges.items.
For more details on Special charges (recoveries), see note 17 "Special Charges (Recoveries)" to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net relates to certain non-operational charges primarily consisting primarilyof income or losses in our share of marketable equity securities accounted for under the equity method and of transactional foreign exchange gains (losses). ThisThe income (expense) from foreign exchange is dependent upon the change in foreign currency exchange rates vis-à-vis the functional currency of the legal entity.

 Year Ended June 30,Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands) 2016 Change increase (decrease) 2015 Change increase (decrease) 20142019 Change increase (decrease) 2018 Change increase (decrease) 2017
Other income (expense), net $(1,423) $26,624
 $(28,047) $(31,988) $3,941
Foreign exchange gains (losses)$(4,330) $(9,175) $4,845
 $1,776
 $3,069
OpenText share in net income (loss) of equity investees
(note 8)
13,668
 7,703
 5,965
 13
 5,952
Income from long-term other receivable
 (1,327) 1,327
 (5,099) 6,426
Gain on shares held in Guidance (1)

 (841) 841
 841
 
Gain from contractual settlement (2)

 (5,000) 5,000
 5,000
 
Other miscellaneous income (expense)818
 823
 (5) (301) 296
Total other income (expense), net$10,156
 $(7,817) $17,973
 $2,230
 $15,743

(1) Represents the release to income from other comprehensive income relating to the mark to market on shares we held in Guidance prior to our acquisition in the first quarter of Fiscal 2018.
Fiscal 2016 Compared to Fiscal 2015

Other expense included foreign exchange losses of $1.9 million on our inter-company transactions during Fiscal 2016 compared to $31.0 million in foreign exchange losses during Fiscal 2015. The remainder of the change is primarily due to a $3.1 million gain recorded in Fiscal 2015 as a result of remeasuring to fair value our investment in Actuate shares held before the date of acquisition.

Fiscal 2015 Compared to Fiscal 2014
Other income in Fiscal 2015 included(2) Represents a gain recognized in connection with the settlement of $3.1 million, resulting from remeasuring to fair value our investmenta certain breach of contractual arrangement in Actuate shares held before the datesecond quarter of acquisition. For more details see note 18 "Acquisitions" to our Consolidated Financial Statements.Fiscal 2018.
Other expense included transactional foreign exchange losses of approximately $31.0 million, primarily on account of foreign exchange on our inter-company exposures.














Interest and Other Related Expense, Net
Interest and other related expense, net is primarily comprised of cash interest paid and accrued on our debt facilities, offset by interest income earned on our cash and cash equivalents.
 Year Ended June 30,Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands) 2016 Change (increase) decrease 2015 Change (increase) decrease 20142019 Change increase (decrease) 2018 Change increase (decrease) 2017
Interest and other related expense, net $76,363
 $21,743
 $54,620
 $26,686
 $27,934
Interest expense related to total outstanding debt (1)
$137,487
 $5,106
 $132,381
 $16,202
 $116,179
Interest income(8,014) (6,342) (1,672) 1,443
 (3,115)
Other miscellaneous expense7,119
 (712) 7,831
 3
 7,828
$136,592
 $(1,948) $138,540
 $17,648
 $120,892
Fiscal 2016 Compared to Fiscal 2015
Interest and other related expense, net increased by $21.7 million as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year. This was primarily due to additional interest expense incurred relating to Senior Notes 2023 and to a lesser extent Senior Notes 2026, which were issued on May 31, 2016, offset by a reduction in interest expense resulting from the repayment of our Term Loan A.
Fiscal 2015 Compared to Fiscal 2014
Interest and other related expense, net increased by $26.7 million. This was primarily the result of additional interest expense incurred relating to Senior Notes 2023 and our Term Loan B, offset by a reduction in interest expense resulting from the repayment of our Term Loan A. Additionally, we received investment income of $2.3 million as part of income distributions made from our cost basis investments. We receive such income distributions periodically and do not expect such income distributions to be made regularly.
(1) For more details see note 10 "Long-Term Debt" to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Provision for (Recovery of) Income Taxes
We operate in several tax jurisdictions and are exposed to various foreign tax rates. We also note that we are subject to tax rate discrepancies between our domestic tax rate and foreign tax rates that are significant and these discrepancies are primarily related to earnings in Luxembourg.the United States.
Please also see Part I, Item 1A "Risk Factors" elsewhere isin this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 Year Ended June 30,Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands) 2016 Change increase (decrease) 2015 Change increase (decrease) 20142019 Change increase (decrease) 2018 Change increase (decrease) 2017
Provision for income taxes $6,282
 $(25,356) $31,638
 $(26,823) $58,461
Provision for (recovery of) income taxes$154,937
 $11,111
 $143,826
 $920,190
 $(776,364)
Fiscal 2016 Compared to Fiscal 2015
The effective tax rate (which is the provision for taxes expressed as a percentage of income before taxes) decreased to 2.2%a provision of 35.2% for the year ended June 30, 2016,2019, compared to 11.9%37.2% for the year ended June 30, 2015.2018. The decreaseincrease in tax expense of $25.4$11.1 million was primarily due to the resultincrease in net income taxed at foreign rates of a decrease$10.7 million, an increase of $26.4 million in valuation allowancereserves for unrecognized tax benefits, an increase of $16.1 million arising on the introduction of BEAT in Fiscal 2019, and an increase of $16.3 million relating to our deferredthe tax assetsimpact of internal reorganizations of subsidiaries, partially offset by a the reversal of accruals for undistributed United States earnings of $14.8 million, the Fiscal 2018 impact of United States tax reform of $19.0 million which did not recur in the amount of $41.6 million, offset byFiscal 2019, an increase in the effecttax credits for research and development of permanent differences$9.7 million, an increase of $6.8 million in the amountrelease of $9.4valuation allowance, a decrease of $5.8 million and tax filings in excessthe impact of amounts previously recorded of $8.0 million.withholding taxes in Fiscal 2019. The remainder of the differences aredifference was due to normal course movements and non-material items.
The decreaseOn December 22, 2017, the United States enacted tax reform legislation through the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which significantly changed the existing US tax laws, including a reduction in the valuation allowancefederal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, and the transition of $41.6US international taxation from a worldwide tax system to a partially territorial tax system. As a result of the enactment of the legislation, the Company incurred a one-time tax expense of $19.0 million is in the year ended June 30, 2018,

primarily attributablerelated to the Company's reorganization of intellectual property intransition tax on accumulated foreign earnings and the first quarter of Fiscal 2017, as well as the integration of recently completed acquisitions, supporting the assessment that the Company will more likely than not realize the valuere-measurement of certain deferred tax assets within a reasonable timeframe. For more details see note 23 “Subsequent Events" to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Fiscal 2015 Compared to Fiscal 2014
The effective tax rate (which isand liabilities. During the provision for taxes expressed as a percentage of income before taxes) decreased to 11.9% for Fiscal 2015, from 21.1% for Fiscal 2014, resulting inyear ended June 30, 2019, there was a reduction of $0.9 million to this amount, mainly attributable to evaluating the portion of our existing Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) credit carryforwards expected to be refundable as a result of the repeal of corporate AMT. The portion of the tax expense inattributable to the amounttransition tax is payable over a period of $26.8 million. This decrease was primarilyup to eight years.
In accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 “Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” (SAB 118), the Company completed its analysis of the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act by December 22, 2018. The Company's final determination of the total one-time tax expense as a result of (i) a decrease in the net expense of unrecognized tax benefits with related interest and penalties in the amount of $15.0 million, (ii) a decrease of $6.3 million in expenses not deductible for tax purposes, and (iii)

lower net income, having an impact of $7.2 million. The remainderenactment of the differences are due to normal course movementsTax Cuts and non-material items.Jobs Act is $18.1 million.
For information with regards to certain potential tax contingencies, see note 13 "Guarantees and Contingencies" to our Consolidated Financial Statements and Part I, Item 1A "Risk Factors".Statements.




Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In addition to reporting financial results in accordance with U.S. GAAP, the Company provides certain financial measures that are not in accordance with U.S. GAAP (Non-GAAP). These Non-GAAP financial measures have certain limitations in that they do not have a standardized meaning and thus the Company's definition may be different from similar Non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies and/or analysts and may differ from period to period. Thus it may be more difficult to compare the Company's financial performance to that of other companies. However, the Company's management compensates for these limitations by providing the relevant disclosure of the items excluded in the calculation of these Non-GAAP financial measures both in its reconciliation to the U.S. GAAP financial measures and its Consolidated Financial Statements, all of which should be considered when evaluating the Company's results.
The Company uses these Non-GAAP financial measures to supplement the information provided in its Consolidated Financial Statements, which are presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The presentation of Non-GAAP financial measures are not meant to be a substitute for financial measures presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP, but rather should be evaluated in conjunction with and as a supplement to such U.S. GAAP measures. OpenText strongly encourages investors to review its financial information in its entirety and not to rely on a single financial measure. The Company therefore believes that despite these limitations, it is appropriate to supplement the disclosure of the U.S. GAAP measures with certain Non-GAAP measures defined below.
Non-GAAP-based net income and Non-GAAP-based EPS, areattributable to OpenText, is consistently calculated as GAAP-based net income or earnings per share, attributable to OpenText, on a diluted basis, excludingafter giving effect to the amortization of acquired intangible assets, other income (expense), share-based compensation, and Special charges (recoveries), all net of tax.tax and any tax benefits/expense items unrelated to current period income, as further described in the tables below. Non-GAAP-based gross profit is the arithmetical sum of GAAP-based gross profit and the amortization of acquired technology-based intangible assets and share-based compensation within cost of sales. Non-GAAP-based gross margin is calculated as Non-GAAP-based gross profit expressed as a percentage of total revenue. Non-GAAP-based income from operations is calculated as GAAP-based income from operations, excluding the amortization of acquired intangible assets, Special charges (recoveries), and share-based compensation expense. Non-GAAP-based operating margin
Adjusted earnings (loss) before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (Adjusted EBITDA) is consistently calculated as Non-GAAP-basedGAAP-based net income, from operations expressed as a percentageattributable to OpenText excluding interest income (expense), provision for income taxes, depreciation and amortization of total revenue.acquired intangible assets, other income (expense), share-based compensation and Special charges (recoveries).
The Company's management believes that the presentation of the above defined Non-GAAP financial measures provides useful information to investors because they portray the financial results of the Company before the impact of certain non-operational charges. The use of the term “non-operational charge” is defined for this purpose as an expense that does not impact the ongoing operating decisions taken by the Company's management and ismanagement. These items are excluded based upon the way the Company's management evaluates the performance of the Company's business for use in the Company's internal reports. In the course of such evaluation and for the purpose of making operating decisions, the Company's management excludes certain items from its analysis, including amortization of acquired intangible assets, Special charges (recoveries), share-based compensation, other income (expense), and the taxation impact of these items. These items are excluded based upon the manner in which management evaluates the business of the Companyreports and are not excluded in the sense that they may be used under U.S. GAAP.
The Company does not acquire businesses on a predictable cycle, and therefore believes that the presentation of non-GAAP measures, which in certain cases adjust for the impact of amortization of intangible assets and the related tax effects that are primarily related to acquisitions, will provide readers of financial statements with a more consistent basis for comparison across accounting periods and be more useful in helping readers understand the Company’s operating results and underlying operational trends. Additionally, the Company has engaged in various restructuring activities over the past several years, primarily due to acquisitions, that have resulted in costs associated with reductions in headcount, consolidation of leased facilities and related costs, all which are recorded under the Company’s “Special Charges (recoveries)” caption on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Each restructuring activity is a discrete event based on a unique set of business objectives or circumstances, and each differs in terms of its operational implementation, business impact and scope, and the size of each restructuring plan can vary significantly from period to period. Therefore, the Company believes that the exclusion of these special charges (recoveries) will also better aid readers of financial statements in the understanding and comparability of the Company's operating results and underlying operational trends.
In summary, the Company believes the provision of supplemental Non-GAAP measures allow investors to evaluate the operational and financial performance of the Company's core business using the same evaluation measures that management uses, and is therefore a useful indication of OpenText's performance or expected performance of future operations and facilitates period-to-period comparison of operating performance (although prior performance is not necessarily indicative of future performance). As a result, the Company considers it appropriate and reasonable to provide, in addition to U.S. GAAP measures, supplementary Non-GAAP financial measures that exclude certain items from the presentation of its financial results.
The following charts provide unaudited reconciliations of U.S. GAAP-based financial measures to Non-GAAP-based financial measures for the following periods presented:presented. Results for reporting periods commencing July 1, 2018 are presented


under the new Topic 606 revenue standard, while prior period results continue to be reported under the previous standard. For more details relating to our adoption of Topic 606 please see Note 1 "Basis of Presentation" and Note 3 "Revenues" to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Reconciliation of selected GAAP-based measures to Non-GAAP-based measures for the year ended June 30, 20162019
(in thousands except for per share data)
Year Ended June 30, 2016Year Ended June 30, 2019
GAAP-based Measures
GAAP-based Measures
% of Total Revenue
AdjustmentsNoteNon-GAAP-based MeasuresNon-GAAP-based Measures % of Total RevenueGAAP-based Measures
GAAP-based Measures
% of Total Revenue
AdjustmentsNoteNon-GAAP-based MeasuresNon-GAAP-based Measures % of Total Revenue
Cost of revenues            
Cloud services and subscriptions$244,021
 $(953)(1)$243,068
 $383,993
 $(948)(1)$383,045
 
Customer support89,861
 (900)(1)88,961
 124,343
 (1,242)(1)123,101
 
Professional service and other155,584
 (1,626)(1)153,958
 224,635
 (1,764)(1)222,871
 
Amortization of acquired technology-based intangible assets74,238
 (74,238)(2)
 183,385
 (183,385)(2)
 
GAAP-based gross profit and gross margin (%) /
Non-GAAP-based gross profit and gross margin (%)
1,250,228
68.5%77,717
(3)1,327,945
72.8%1,938,052
67.6%187,339
(3)2,125,391
74.1%
Operating expenses            
Research and development194,057
 (2,824)(1)191,233
 321,836
 (4,991)(1)316,845
 
Sales and marketing344,235
 (12,069)(1)332,166
 518,035
 (7,880)(1)510,155
 
General and administrative140,397
 (7,606)(1)132,791
 207,909
 (9,945)(1)197,964
 
Amortization of acquired customer-based intangible assets113,201
 (113,201)(2)
 189,827
 (189,827)(2)
 
Special charges (recoveries)34,846
 (34,846)(4)
 35,719
 (35,719)(4)
 
GAAP-based income from operations and operating margin (%) / Non-GAAP-based income from operations and operating margin (%)368,563
20.2%248,263
(5)616,826
33.8%
GAAP-based income from operations / Non-GAAP-based income from operations567,010
 435,701
(5)1,002,711
 
Other income (expense), net(1,423) 1,423
(6)
 10,156
 (10,156)(6)
 
Provision for (recovery of) income taxes6,282
 101,793
(7)108,075
 154,937
 (33,680)(7)121,257
 
GAAP-based net income / Non-GAAP-based net income, attributable to OpenText284,477
 147,893
(8)432,370
 285,501
 459,225
(8)744,726
 
GAAP-based earnings per share / Non GAAP-based earnings per share-diluted, attributable to OpenText$2.33
 $1.21
(8)$3.54
 
GAAP-based earnings per share / Non-GAAP-based earnings per share-diluted, attributable to OpenText$1.06
 $1.70
(8)$2.76
 


(1)Adjustment relates to the exclusion of share-based compensation expense from our Non-GAAP-based operating expenses as this expense is excluded from our internal analysis of operating results.
(2)Adjustment relates to the exclusion of amortization expense from our Non-GAAP-based operating expenses as the timing and frequency of amortization expense is dependent on our acquisitions and is hence excluded from our internal analysis of operating results.
(3)GAAP-based and Non-GAAP-based gross profit stated in dollars and gross margin stated as a percentage of total revenue.
(4)Adjustment relates to the exclusion of Special charges (recoveries) from our Non-GAAP-based operating expenses as Special charges (recoveries) are generally incurred in the periods following the relevant acquisitions,to an acquisition and include one-time, non-recurringcertain charges or recoveries andthat are not indicative or related to continuing operations, and are therefore excluded from our internal analysis of operating results. See note 17 "Special Charges (Recoveries)" to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for more details.
(5)GAAP-based and Non-GAAP-based income from operations stated in dollars and operating margin stated as a percentage of total revenue.dollars.
(6)Adjustment relates to the exclusion of Other income (expense) from our Non-GAAP-based operating expenses as Other income (expense) generally relates primarily to the transactional impact of foreign exchange and is generally not indicative or related to continuing operations and is therefore excluded from our internal analysis of operating results. Other income (expense) also includes our share of income (losses) from our holdings in non-marketable securities investments as a limited partner. We do not actively trade equity securities in these privately held companies nor do we plan our ongoing operations based around any anticipated fundings or distributions from these investments. We exclude gains and losses on these investments as we do not believe they are reflective of our ongoing business and operating results.
(7)Adjustment relates to differences between the GAAP-based tax provision rate of approximately 2%35% and a Non-GAAP-based tax rate of 20%approximately 14%; these rate differences are due to the income tax effects of expensesitems that are excluded for the purpose of calculating Non-GAAP-based adjusted net income. Such excluded expensesitems include amortization, share-based compensation, Special charges (recoveries) and other income (expense), net. Also excluded are tax benefits/expense items unrelated to current period income such as changes in reserves for tax uncertainties and valuation allowance reserves, tax arising on internal reorganizations, and “book to return” adjustments for tax return filings and tax assessments (in total “adjusted expenses”).assessments. Included is the amount of net tax benefits arising from the internal reorganization that occurred in Fiscal 2017 assumed to be allocable to the current period based on the forecasted utilization period. In arriving at our Non-GAAP-based tax rate of 20%approximately 14%, we analyzed the individual adjusted expenses and took into consideration the impact of statutory tax rates from local jurisdictions incurring the expense.

(8)Reconciliation of GAAP-based net income to Non-GAAP-based net income:
Year Ended June 30, 2016Year Ended June 30, 2019
 Per share diluted
 Per share diluted
GAAP-based net income, attributable to OpenText$284,477
$2.33
$285,501
$1.06
Add:  
Amortization187,439
1.54
373,212
1.38
Share-based compensation25,978
0.21
26,770
0.10
Special charges (recoveries)34,846
0.29
35,719
0.13
Other (income) expense, net1,423
0.01
(10,156)(0.04)
GAAP-based provision for (recovery of) income taxes6,282
0.05
154,937
0.57
Non-GAAP based provision for income taxes(108,075)(0.89)
Non-GAAP-based provision for income taxes(121,257)(0.44)
Non-GAAP-based net income, attributable to OpenText$432,370
$3.54
$744,726
$2.76
Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA
 Year Ended June 30, 2019
GAAP-based net income, attributable to OpenText$285,501
Add: 
Provision for (recovery of) income taxes154,937
Interest and other related expense, net136,592
Amortization of acquired technology-based intangible assets183,385
Amortization of acquired customer-based intangible assets189,827
Depreciation97,716
Share-based compensation26,770
Special charges (recoveries)35,719
Other (income) expense, net(10,156)
Adjusted EBITDA$1,100,291


Reconciliation of selected GAAP-based measures to Non-GAAP-based measures for the year ended June 30, 20152018
(in thousands except for per share data)
Year Ended June 30, 2015Year Ended June 30, 2018
GAAP-based MeasuresGAAP-based Measures
% of Total Revenue
AdjustmentsNoteNon-GAAP-based MeasuresNon-GAAP-based Measures % of Total RevenueGAAP-based MeasuresGAAP-based Measures
% of Total Revenue
AdjustmentsNoteNon-GAAP-based MeasuresNon-GAAP-based Measures % of Total Revenue
Cost of revenues            
Cloud services and subscriptions$237,310
 $(833)(1)$236,477
 $364,160
 $(1,429)(1)$362,731
 
Customer support94,456
 (832)(1)93,624
 133,889
 (1,233)(1)132,656
 
Professional service and other172,742
 (1,335)(1)171,407
 253,389
 (1,838)(1)251,551
 
Amortization of acquired technology-based intangible assets81,002
 (81,002)(2)
 185,868
 (185,868)(2)
 
GAAP-based gross profit and gross margin (%) /
Non-GAAP-based gross profit and gross margin (%)
1,253,508
67.7%84,002
(3)1,337,510
72.2%1,864,242
66.2%190,368
(3)2,054,610
73.0%
Operating expenses            
Research and development196,491
 (2,496)(1)193,995
 322,909
 (5,659)(1)317,250
 
Sales and marketing373,610
 (9,095)(1)364,515
 529,141
 (9,231)(1)519,910
 
General and administrative162,728
 (7,456)(1)155,272
 205,227
 (8,204)(1)197,023
 
Amortization of acquired customer-based intangible assets108,239
 (108,239)(2)
 184,118
 (184,118)(2)
 
Special charges (recoveries)12,823
 (12,823)(4)
 29,211
 (29,211)(4)
 
GAAP-based income from operations and operating margin (%) / Non-GAAP-based income from operations and operating margin (%)348,711
18.8%224,111
(5)572,822
30.9%
GAAP-based income from operations / Non-GAAP-based income from operations506,693
 426,791
(5)933,484
 
Other income (expense), net(28,047) 28,047
(6)
 17,973
 (17,973)(6)
 
Provision for (recovery of) income taxes31,638
 61,559
(7)93,197
 143,826
 (32,534)(7)111,292
 
GAAP-based net income / Non-GAAP-based net income, attributable to OpenText234,327
 190,599
(8)424,926
 242,224
 441,352
(8)683,576
 
GAAP-based earnings per share / Non GAAP-based earnings per share-diluted, attributable to OpenText$1.91
 $1.55
(8)$3.46
 
GAAP-based earnings per share / Non-GAAP-based earnings per share-diluted, attributable to OpenText$0.91
 $1.65
(8)$2.56
 


(1)Adjustment relates to the exclusion of share-based compensation expense from our Non-GAAP-based operating expenses as this expense is excluded from our internal analysis of operating results.
(2)Adjustment relates to the exclusion of amortization expense from our Non-GAAP-based operating expenses as the timing and frequency of amortization expense is dependent on our acquisitions and is hence excluded from our internal analysis of operating results.
(3)GAAP-based and Non-GAAP-based gross profit stated in dollars and gross margin stated as a percentage of total revenue.
(4)Adjustment relates to the exclusion of Special charges (recoveries) from our Non-GAAP-based operating expenses as Special charges (recoveries) are generally incurred in the periods following the relevant acquisitions,to an acquisition and include one-time, non-recurringcertain charges or recoveries andthat are not indicative or related to continuing operations, and are therefore excluded from our internal analysis of operating results. See note 17 "Special Charges (Recoveries)" to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for more details.
(5)GAAP-based and Non-GAAP-based income from operations stated in dollars and operating margin stated as a percentage of total revenue.dollars.
(6)Adjustment relates to the exclusion of Other income (expense) from our Non-GAAP-based operating expenses as Other income (expense) generally relates primarily to the transactional impact of foreign exchange and is generally not indicative or related to continuing operations and is therefore excluded from our internal analysis of operating results. Other income (expense) also includes our share of income (losses) from our holdings in non-marketable securities investments as a limited partner. We do not actively trade equity securities in these privately held companies nor do we plan our ongoing operations based around any anticipated fundings or distributions from these investments. We exclude gains and losses on these investments as we do not believe they are reflective of our ongoing business and operating results.
(7)Adjustment relates to differences between the GAAP-based tax provision rate of approximately 12%37% and a Non-GAAP-based tax rate of 18%approximately 14%; these rate differences are due to the income tax effects of expensesitems that are excluded for the purpose of calculating Non-GAAP-based adjusted net income. Such excluded expensesitems include amortization, share-based compensation, Special charges (recoveries) and other income (expense), net. Also excluded are tax benefits/expense items unrelated to current period income such as changes in reserves for tax uncertainties and valuation allowance reserves tax arising on internal reorganizations, and “book to return” adjustments for tax return filings and tax assessments (in total “adjusted expenses”).assessments. Included is the amount of net tax benefits arising from the internal reorganization that occurred in Fiscal 2017 assumed to be allocable to the current period based on the forecasted utilization period. In arriving at our Non-GAAP-based tax rate of 18%approximately 14%, we analyzed the individual adjusted expenses and took into consideration the impact of statutory tax rates from local jurisdictions incurring the expense.
We also took into consideration changes in US tax reform legislation that was enacted on December 22, 2017 through the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

(8)Reconciliation of GAAP-based net income to Non-GAAP-based net income:
Year Ended June 30, 2015Year Ended June 30, 2018
 Per share diluted
 Per share diluted
GAAP-based net income, attributable to OpenText$234,327
$1.91
$242,224
$0.91
Add:  
Amortization189,241
1.54
369,986
1.38
Share-based compensation22,047
0.18
27,594
0.10
Special charges (recoveries)12,823
0.10
29,211
0.11
Other (income) expense, net28,047
0.23
(17,973)(0.07)
GAAP-based provision for (recovery of) income taxes31,638
0.26
143,826
0.54
Non-GAAP based provision for income taxes(93,197)(0.76)
Non-GAAP-based provision for income taxes(111,292)(0.41)
Non-GAAP-based net income, attributable to OpenText$424,926
$3.46
$683,576
$2.56


Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA
 Year Ended June 30, 2018
GAAP-based net income, attributable to OpenText$242,224
Add: 
Provision for (recovery of) income taxes143,826
Interest and other related expense, net138,540
Amortization of acquired technology-based intangible assets185,868
Amortization of acquired customer-based intangible assets184,118
Depreciation86,943
Share-based compensation27,594
Special charges (recoveries)29,211
Other (income) expense, net(17,973)
Adjusted EBITDA$1,020,351


Reconciliation of selected GAAP-based measures to Non-GAAP-based measures for the year ended June 30, 20142017
(in thousands except for per share data)
Year Ended June 30, 2014Year Ended June 30, 2017
GAAP-based MeasuresGAAP-based Measures
% of Total Revenue
AdjustmentsNoteNon-GAAP-based MeasuresNon-GAAP-based Measures % of Total RevenueGAAP-based MeasuresGAAP-based Measures
% of Total Revenue
AdjustmentsNoteNon-GAAP-based MeasuresNon-GAAP-based Measures % of Total Revenue
Cost of revenues            
Cloud services and subscriptions$142,193
 $(342)(1)$141,851
 $299,850
 $(1,229)(1)$298,621
 
Customer support96,068
 (754)(1)95,314
 122,565
 (1,079)(1)121,486
 
Professional service and other189,403
 (855)(1)188,548
 194,954
 (1,451)(1)193,503
 
Amortization of acquired technology-based intangible assets69,917
 (69,917)(2)
 130,556
 (130,556)(2)
 
GAAP-based gross profit and gross margin (%) /
Non-GAAP-based gross profit and gross margin (%)
1,113,957
68.6%71,868
(3)1,185,825
73.0%1,529,500
66.8%134,315
(3)1,663,815
72.6%
Operating expenses            
Research and development176,834
 (2,356)(1)174,478
 281,215
 (7,149)(1)274,066
 
Sales and marketing346,941
 (7,312)(1)339,629
 444,454
 (9,680)(1)434,774
 
General and administrative142,080
 (8,287)(1)133,793
 170,353
 (9,919)(1)160,434
 
Amortization of acquired customer-based intangible assets81,023
 (81,023)(2)
 150,842
 (150,842)(2)
 
Special charges (recoveries)31,314
 (31,314)(4)
 63,618
 (63,618)(4)
 
GAAP-based income from operations and operating margin (%) / Non-GAAP-based income from operations and operating margin (%)300,528
18.5%202,160
(5)502,688
30.9%
GAAP-based income from operations / Non-GAAP-based income from operations354,700
 375,523
(5)730,223
 
Other income (expense), net3,941
 (3,941)(6)
 15,743
 (15,743)(6)
 
Provision for (recovery of) income taxes58,461
 9,569
(7)68,030
 (776,364) 867,764
(7)91,400
 
GAAP-based net income / Non-GAAP-based net income, attributable to OpenText218,125
 188,650
(8)406,775
 1,025,659
 (507,984)(8)517,675
 
GAAP-based earnings per share / Non GAAP-based earnings per share-diluted, attributable to OpenText$1.81
 $1.56
(8)$3.37
 
GAAP-based earnings per share / Non-GAAP-based earnings per share-diluted, attributable to OpenText$4.01
 $(1.99)(8)$2.02
 


(1)Adjustment relates to the exclusion of share-based compensation expense from our Non-GAAP-based operating expenses as this expense is excluded from our internal analysis of operating results.
(2)Adjustment relates to the exclusion of amortization expense from our Non-GAAP-based operating expenses as the timing and frequency of amortization expense is dependent on our acquisitions and is hence excluded from our internal analysis of operating results.
(3)GAAP-based and Non-GAAP-based gross profit stated in dollars and gross margin stated as a percentage of total revenue.
(4)Adjustment relates to the exclusion of Special charges (recoveries) from our Non-GAAP-based operating expenses as Special charges (recoveries) are generally incurred in the periods following the relevant acquisitions,to an acquisition and include one-time, non-recurringcertain charges or recoveries andthat are not indicative or related to continuing operations, and are therefore excluded from our internal analysis of operating results. See note 17 "Special Charges (Recoveries)" to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for more details.
(5)GAAP-based and Non-GAAP-based income from operations stated in dollars and operating margin stated as a percentage of total revenue.dollars.
(6)Adjustment relates to the exclusion of Other income (expense) from our Non-GAAP-based operating expenses as Other income (expense) generally relates primarily to the transactional impact of foreign exchange and is generally not indicative or related to continuing operations and is therefore excluded from our internal analysis of operating results. Other income (expense) also includes our share of income (losses) from our holdings in non-marketable securities investments as a limited partner. We do not actively trade equity securities in these privately held companies nor do we plan our ongoing operations based around any anticipated fundings or distributions from these investments. We exclude gains and losses on these investments as we do not believe they are reflective of our ongoing business and operating results.
(7)Adjustment relates to differences between the GAAP-based tax provisionrecovery rate of approximately 21%311% and a Non-GAAP-based tax rate of 14.3%approximately 15%; these rate differences are due to the income tax effects of expensesitems that are excluded for the purpose of calculating Non-GAAP-based adjusted net income. Such excluded expensesitems include amortization, share-based compensation, Special charges (recoveries) and other income (expense), net. Also excluded are tax benefits/expense items unrelated to current period income such as changes in reserves for tax uncertainties and valuation allowance reserves tax arising on internal reorganizations, and “book to return” adjustments for tax return filings and tax assessments (in total “adjusted expenses”assessments. Included is the amount of net tax benefits arising from the internal reorganization (see note 14 "Income Taxes"). assumed to be allocable to the current period based on the forecasted utilization period. In arriving at our Non-GAAP-based tax rate of 14.3%approximately 15%, we analyzed the individual adjusted expenses and took into consideration the impact of statutory tax rates from local jurisdictions incurring the expense.

(8)Reconciliation of GAAP-based net income to Non-GAAP-based net income:
Year Ended June 30, 2014Year Ended June 30, 2017
 Per share diluted
 Per share diluted
GAAP-based net income, attributable to OpenText$218,125
$1.81
$1,025,659
$4.01
Add:  
Amortization150,940
1.25
281,398
1.10
Share-based compensation19,906
0.17
30,507
0.12
Special charges (recoveries)31,314
0.26
63,618
0.25
Other (income) expense, net(3,941)(0.03)(15,743)(0.06)
GAAP-based provision for (recovery of) income taxes58,461
0.48
(776,364)(3.03)
Non-GAAP based provision for income taxes(68,030)(0.57)
Non-GAAP-based provision for income taxes(91,400)(0.37)
Non-GAAP-based net income, attributable to OpenText$406,775
$3.37
$517,675
$2.02



Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA
 Year Ended June 30, 2017
GAAP-based net income, attributable to OpenText$1,025,659
Add: 
Provision for (recovery of) income taxes(776,364)
Interest and other related expense, net120,892
Amortization of acquired technology-based intangible assets130,556
Amortization of acquired customer-based intangible assets150,842
Depreciation64,318
Share-based compensation30,507
Special charges (recoveries)63,618
Other (income) expense, net(15,743)
Adjusted EBITDA$794,285




LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The following tables set forth changes in cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities for the periods indicated:
  As of June 30,
(In thousands) 
 2016 
Change
increase (decrease)
 2015 
Change
increase (decrease)
 2014
Cash and cash equivalents $1,283,757
 $583,758
 $699,999
 $272,109
 $427,890
Marketable Securities* $11,839
 $(8,435) $20,274
 $20,274
 $
*The short-term portion of the marketable securities are recorded within "short-term investments" and the long-term portion of the marketable securities are included within "Other Assets" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(In thousands) 
As of June 30, 2019 
Change
increase (decrease)
 As of June 30, 2018 Change
increase (decrease)
 As of June 30, 2017
Cash and cash equivalents$941,009
 $258,067
 $682,942
 $239,585
 $443,357
Restricted cash included in Other assets2,534
 1,485
 1,049
 (1,804) 2,853
Total Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash$943,543
 $259,552
 $683,991
 $237,781
 $446,210
 Year Ended June 30,Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands)
 2016 Change 2015 Change 20142019 Change 2018 Change 2017
Cash provided by operating activities $525,722
 $2,691
 $523,031
 $105,904
 $417,127
$876,278
 $168,197
 $708,081
 $267,728
 $440,353
Cash used in investing activities $(361,176) $37,219
 $(398,395) $754,973
 $(1,153,368)$(464,526) $(20,085) $(444,441) $1,746,523
 $(2,190,964)
Cash provided by financing activities $430,164
 $259,559
 $170,605
 $(517,339) $687,944
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities$(148,374) $(124,701) $(23,673) $(933,217) $909,544
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents primarily consist of balances with banks as well as deposits with original maturities of 90 days or less.
We continue to anticipate that our cash and cash equivalents, as well as available credit facilities, will be sufficient to fund our anticipated cash requirements for working capital, contractual commitments, capital expenditures, dividends potential acquisitions under our normal course issuer bid, and operating needs for the next 12twelve months. However, anyAny further material or acquisition-related activities may require additional sources of financing and would be subject to the financial covenants established under our credit facilities. For more details, see "Long-term Debt and Credit Facilities" below.
As atof June 30, 2016,2019, we have provided $15.9recognized a provision of $17.4 million (June 30, 2015—2018—$12.128.5 million) in respect of both additional foreign withholding taxes or deferred income tax liabilities for temporary differences related to the undistributed earnings of certain non-United States subsidiaries, and planned periodic repatriations from certain United States and LuxembourgGerman subsidiaries, that will be subject to withholding taxes upon distribution.
Cash flows provided by operating activities
Fiscal 2016 Compared to Fiscal 2015
Cash flows from operating activities increased by $2.7$168.2 million due to an increase in changes from working capital of $157.5 million and an increase in net income before the impact of non-cash items of $17.0 million, partially offset by a decrease in changes from working capital of $14.3$10.7 million. The decreaseincrease in operating cash flow from changes in working capital of $14.3 million was primarily due to the net impact of the following decreases:increases: (i) $34.2$98.1 million relating to a decrease in accounts receivable, and (ii) $11.5$69.9 million relating to deferred revenue. These decreases were partially offset by increases of: (i) $17.0 million relating toan increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, as a result of an active working capital management program, (ii) $7.2 million relating to other assets, (iii) $3.8 million relating to prepaid and other current assets, and (iv) $3.4$58.6 million relating to income taxes payable and (iv) $6.5 million relating to a decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets. These increases in operating cash flows were partially offset by decreases of (i) $37.6 million relating to higher contract assets, (ii) $37.5 million relating to lower deferred chargesrevenues, and credits.(iii) $0.5 million relating to higher balances of other assets.
During the fourth quarter of Fiscal 20162019 our Days Sales Outstandingdays sales outstanding (DSO) was 5356 days, the same ascompared to a DSO of 58 days during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2015 and the2018. The per day impact of our DSO in the fourth quarters of Fiscal 20162019 and Fiscal 20152018 on our cash flows was the same at $3.2 million for each period.
Fiscal 2015 Compared to Fiscal 2014
Cash flows from operating activities increased by $105.9 million due to an increase in net income before the impact of non-cash items of $73.7$8.3 million and $8.4 million, respectively. In arriving at DSO, we exclude contract assets as these assets do not provide an increase in changes from working capital of $32.2 million. The increase in operating cash flow from changes in working capital of $32.2 million was primarily dueunconditional right to the net impact ofrelated consideration from the following changes: (i) $60.4 million relating to accounts receivable, (ii) $13.8 million relating to accounts payable and accrued liabilities and (iii) $0.8 million relating to other assets. These increases were offset by the net impact of the following changes: (i) $18.2 million relating to income taxes and deferred charges and credits, (ii) $14.7 million due to prepaid and other current assets and (iii) $9.9

million relating to deferred revenue. The changes in working capital were largely due to the increased scale of operations resulting from our GXS acquisition.
During the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2015 our Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) was 53 days the same as DSO of 53 days during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2014 and the per day impact of our DSO in the fourth quarters of Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014 on our cash flows was $3.2 million and $3.3 million, respectively.customer.
Cash flows used in investing activities
Our cash flows used in investing activities is primarily on account of acquisitions and additions of property and equipment.
Fiscal 2016 Compared to Fiscal 2015
Cash flows used in investing activities decreasedincreased by $37.2 million.$20.1 million, primarily due to an increase of $63.2 million in consideration paid for acquisitions during Fiscal 2019, as compared to Fiscal 2018. This was primarily because we spent $33.9partially offset by a decrease of $41.5 million less on acquisitions in Fiscal 2016 than we did in Fiscal 2015. We also spent $7.0 million less on additionspurchases of property and equipment and $1.8 million less on other investing activities. These decreases were offset by in an inflowequipment. The remainder of investing cash from the maturity of our short term investments of $5.8 million.change was due to miscellaneous items.
Fiscal 2015 Compared to Fiscal 2014
Cash flows used in investing activities decreasedprovided by $755.0 million. This was primarily due to lower consideration for our acquisitions made during Fiscal 2015 than for our acquisitions made during Fiscal 2014, and proceeds of $17.0 million received from the maturity of short-term investments. These were partially offset by incremental additions to property and equipment of $34.8 million, and a $8.1 million increase in other investing activities.
Cash flows from(used in) financing activities
Our cash flows from financing activities generally consist of long-term debt financing and amounts received from stock options exercised by our employees. These inflows are typically offset by scheduled and non-scheduled repayments of our long-term debt financing and, when applicable, the payment of dividends and/or the repurchases of our Common Shares.
Fiscal 2016 Compared to Fiscal 2015
Cash flows provided byused in financing activities increased by $259.6$124.7 million. This was primarily due to the repayment of Term Loan A which occurred in Fiscal 2015 (with no equivalent event in Fiscal 2016). The reduction in principal payments resulted in(i) a net positive inflowincrease of $522.3 million. Additionally,$56.3 million on long-term debt issuance costs were lower which resulted in a positive inflowrepayments, (ii) $23.2 million relating to higher dividend payments to our shareholders, (iii) $26.5 million relating to funds we provide to an independent agent to facilitate the repurchase of $11.5millionCommon Shares on the open market, for potential reissuance under our long-term incentive and proceedsother plans and (iv) $18.2 million relating to less cash collected from the issuance of Common shares were higher by $4.9 million. These increases were partially offset by (i) lower proceeds received from long term debtShares for the exercise of $200 million, representing the difference between the $800 million of Senior Notes 2023 issued in Fiscal 2015options and the $600 million of Senior Notes 2026 issued in Fiscal 2016, (ii) the repurchase in Fiscal 2016 of approximately 1.5 million Common Shares for approximately $65.5 million under ourOpenText Employee Share RepurchasePurchase Plan and (iii) a $11.6 million increase in dividend payments made to our shareholders in Fiscal 2016. The remainder of the change was due to miscellaneous items.
Fiscal 2015 Compared to Fiscal 2014
Cash flows provided by financing activities decreased by $517.3 million. This was primarily due to the repayment of the outstanding balances of our Term Loan A during the third quarter of Fiscal 2015 and of our mortgage during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2015. Additionally, we increased dividend payments to our shareholders by $12.9 million, we purchased Treasury stock for potential reissuance under our current LTIP plans for $8.9 million, and we incurred approximately $2.0 million in additional debt issuance costs.(ESPP).
Cash Dividends
In Fiscal 2016,During the year ended June 30, 2019, we declared and paid cash dividends of $0.83$0.6300 per Common Share that totaled $99.3in the aggregated amount of $168.9 million. Future declarations of dividends and the establishment of future record and payment dates are subject to the final determination and discretion of the Board. See Item 5 "Dividend Policy" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information.
In Fiscal 2015,During the year ended June 30, 2018, we declared and paid cash dividends of $0.7175$0.5478 per Common Share that totaled $87.6in the aggregate amount of $145.6 million.
In Fiscal 2014,During the year ended June 30, 2017, we declared and paid cash dividends of $0.6225$0.4770 per Common Share that totaled $74.7in the aggregate amount of $120.6 million.

Long-term Debt and Credit Facilities
Senior Unsecured Fixed Rate Notes
Senior Notes 2026
On May 31, 2016 we issued $600 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.875% Senior Notes due 2026 (Senior Notes 2026) in an unregistered offering to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act, and to certain persons in offshore transactions pursuant to Regulation S under the Securities Act. Senior Notes 2026 bear interest at a rate of 5.875% per annum, payable semi-annually in arrears on June 1 and December 1, commencing on December 1, 2016. Senior Notes 2026 will mature on June 1, 2026, unless earlier redeemed, in accordance with their terms, or repurchased.
On December 20, 2016, we issued an additional $250 million in aggregate principal amount by reopening our Senior Notes 2026 at an issue price of 102.75%. The additional notes have identical terms, are fungible with and are a part of a single series with the previously issued $600 million aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes 2026. The outstanding aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes 2026, after taking into consideration the additional issuance, is $850 million.
We may redeem all or a portion of the Senior Notes 2026 at any time prior to June 1, 2021 at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of Senior Notes 2026 plus an applicable premium, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date. In addition, weWe may also, redeem up to 40% of the aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes 2026, on one or more occasions, prior to June 1, 2019, using the net proceeds from certain qualified equity offerings at a redemption price of 105.875% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date, subject to compliance with certain conditions. We may, on one or more occasions, redeem Senior Notes 2026, in whole or in part, at any time on and after June 1, 2021 at the applicable redemption prices set forth in the indenture governing the Senior Notes 2026, dated as of May 31, 2016, among the Company, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, The Bank of New York Mellon, as U.S. trustee, and BNY Trust Company of Canada, as Canadian trustee (the 2026 Indenture), plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date.
If we experience one of the kinds of changes of control triggering events specified in the 2026 Indenture, we will be required to make an offer to repurchase Senior Notes 2026 at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount of Senior Notes 2026, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase.
The 2026 Indenture contains covenants that limit our and certain of our subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things: (i) create certain liens and enter into sale and lease-back transactions; (ii) create, assume, incur or guarantee additional indebtedness of the Company or the guarantors without such subsidiary becoming a subsidiary guarantor of the notes; and (iii) consolidate, amalgamate or merge with, or convey, transfer, lease or otherwise dispose of its property and assets substantially as an entirety to, another person. These covenants are subject to a number of important limitations and exceptions as set forth in the 2026 Indenture. The 2026 Indenture also provides for events of default, which, if any of them occurs, may permit or, in certain circumstances, require the principal, premium, if any, interest and any other monetary obligations on all the then-outstanding notes to be due and payable immediately.

Senior Notes 2026 are initially guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by our existing and future wholly-owned subsidiaries that borrow or guarantee the obligations under our existing senior credit facilities. Senior Notes 2026 and the guarantees rank equally in right of payment with all of our and our guarantors’ existing and future senior unsubordinated debt and will rank senior in right of payment to all of the our and our guarantors’ future subordinated debt. Senior Notes 2026 and the guarantees will be effectively subordinated to all of our and our guarantors’ existing and future secured debt, including the obligations under the senior credit facilities, to the extent of the value of the assets securing such secured debt.
The foregoing description of the 2026 Indenture does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the 2026 Indenture, which is filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 31, 2016.
Senior Notes 2023
On January 15, 2015, we issued $800 million in aggregate principal amount of our 5.625% Senior Notes due 2023 (Senior Notes 2023) in an unregistered offering to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act and to certain persons in offshore transactions pursuant to Regulation S under the Securities Act. Senior Notes 2023 bear interest at a rate of 5.625% per annum, payable semi-annually in arrears on January 15 and July 15, commencing on July 15, 2015. Senior Notes 2023 will mature on January 15, 2023, unless earlier redeemed in accordance with their terms, or repurchased.
We may, redeem all or a portion of the Senior Notes 2023 at any time prior to January 15, 2018 at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of Senior Notes 2023 plus an applicable premium, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date. In addition, we may also redeem up to 40% of the aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes 2023, on one or more occasions, prior to January 15, 2018, using the net proceeds from certain qualified equity offerings at a redemption price of 105.625% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date, subject to compliance with certain conditions. We may, on one or more occasion, redeem Senior Notes 2023, in whole or in part, at any time on and after January 15, 2018 at the applicable redemption prices set forth in the indenture governing the Senior Notes 2023, dated as of January 15, 2015, among the Company, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, The Bank of New York

Mellon (as successor to Citibank N.A.), as U.S. trustee, and BNY Trust Company of Canada (as successor to Citi Trust Company Canada), as Canadian trustee (the 2023 Indenture), plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date.
If we experience one of the kinds of changes of control triggering events specified in the 2023 Indenture, we will be required to make an offer to repurchase Senior Notes 2023 at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount of Senior Notes 2023, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase.
The 2023 Indenture contains covenants that limit our and certain of our subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things: (i) create certain liens and enter into sale and lease-back transactions; (ii) create, assume, incur or guarantee additional indebtedness of the Company or the subsidiary guarantors without such subsidiary becoming a subsidiary guarantor of Senior Notes 2023; and (iii) consolidate, amalgamate or merge with, or convey, transfer, lease or otherwise dispose of its property and assets substantially as an entirety to, another person. These covenants are subject to a number of important limitations and exceptions as set forth in the 2023 Indenture. The 2023 Indenture also provides for events of default, which, if any of them occurs, may permit or, in certain circumstances, require the principal, premium, if any, interest and any other monetary obligations on all the then-outstanding notes to be due and payable immediately.
Senior Notes 2023 are initially guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by our existing and future wholly-owned subsidiaries that borrow or guarantee the obligations under our existing senior credit facilities. Senior Notes 2023 and the guarantees rank equally in right of payment with all of our and our subsidiary guarantors’ existing and future senior unsubordinated debt and will rank senior in right of payment to all of our and our subsidiary guarantors’ future subordinated debt. Senior Notes 2023 and the guarantees will be effectively subordinated to all of ours and our guarantors’ existing and future secured debt, including the obligations under the Revolver and Term Loan B (as defined herein), to the extent of the value of the assets securing such secured debt.
The foregoing description of the 2023 Indenture does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the 2023 Indenture, which is filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 15, 2015.
Term Loan B
In connection with the acquisition of GXS, on January 16, 2014,On May 30, 2018, we entered into a second credit facility, which provides for a $800 million$1 billion term loan facility with certain lenders named therein, Barclays Bank PLC (Barclays), as sole administrative agent and collateral agent, and with Barclays and RBC Capital Markets as lead arrangersarranger and joint bookrunnersbookrunner (Term Loan B). and borrowed the full amount on May 30, 2018 to, among other things, repay in full the loans under our prior $800 million term loan credit facility originally entered into on January 16, 2014. Repayments made under Term Loan B are equal to 0.25% of the original principal amount in equal quarterly installments for the life of Term Loan B, with the remainder due at maturity.
Borrowings under Term Loan B are secured by a first charge over substantially all of our assets on a pari passu basis with the Revolver. We entered into Term Loan B and borrowed the full amount of $800 million on January 16, 2014. Term Loan B has a seven year term.term, maturing in May 2025.
Borrowings under Term Loan B bear interest at a rate per annum equal to an applicable margin plus, at the borrower’s option, either (1) the eurodollar rate for the interest period relevant to such borrowing or (2) an ABR rate determined by reference to the greatest of (i) the prime rate of Barclays, (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% per annum and (iii) the one month eurodollar rate plus 1.00% per annum.rate. The applicable

margin for borrowings under Term Loan B will be 2.5%is 1.75%, with respect to LIBOR borrowingsadvances and 1.5%0.75%, with respect to ABR rate borrowings.
Currently we have chosenadvances. The interest on the current outstanding balance for our borrowings under Term Loan B to bear a floating rate of interest at a rate per annumis equal to 2.5%1.75% plus the higher of LIBOR or 0.75%(subject to a 0.00% floor). As of June 30, 2016,2019, the outstanding balance on the Term Loan B bears an interest rate was 3.25%of approximately 4.19%.
Term Loan B has incremental facility capacity of (i) $250 million plus (ii) additional amounts, subject to meeting a “consolidated senior secured net leverage” ratio not exceeding 2.75:1.00, in each case subject to certain conditions. Consolidated senior secured net leverage ratio is defined for this purpose as the proportion of our total debt reduced by unrestricted cash, including guarantees and letters of credit, that is secured by our or any of our subsidiaries’ assets, over our trailing twelve months net income before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, restructuring, share-based compensation and other miscellaneous charges.
Under Term Loan B, we must maintain a “consolidated net leverage” ratio of no more than 4:1 at the end of each financial quarter. Consolidated net leverage ratio is defined for this purpose as the proportion of our total debt reduced by unrestricted cash, including guarantees and letters of credit, over our trailing twelve months net income before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, restructuring, share-based compensation and other miscellaneous charges. As of June 30, 2016,2019, our consolidated net leverage ratio was 1.3:1.5:1.
For further details relating to our Term Loan B, please see note 10 "Long-Term Debt" to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Revolver
We currently have a $300$450 million committed revolving credit facility (the Revolver). which matures on May 5, 2022. Borrowings under the Revolver are secured by a first charge over substantially all of our assets, and on a pari passu basis with Term Loan B. The Revolver will mature on December 22, 2019 withhas no fixed repayment date prior to the end of the term and has financial covenants consistent with Term Loan B. term. Borrowings under the Revolver bear interest per annum at a floating rate of LIBOR plus a fixed margin dependent on our consolidated net leverage ratio ranging from 1.25% to 1.75%.
As of June 30, 2016,2019, we have not drawn any amountsno outstanding balance on the Revolver.
Employee Share Purchase Plan (ESPP)
In order to encourage further participation by eligible employees in There was no activity during the ESPP,year ended June 30, 2019 and we implemented a number of amendments to our ESPP, including increasing the purchase price discount from 5% to 15% and permitting Common Shares to be purchased on the open market by the trustee of a trust, or by an agent or broker designated by an administrator, and transferred to eligible employees under the ESPP, as an alternative to the issuance of Common Shares from treasury (the Amendments). The Amendments apply to purchase periods commencing on or after January 1, 2016 unless otherwise determined by the Board or the compensation committee of the Board.
In accordance with the Amendments, during Fiscal 2016, we have determined that 80,273 Common Shares are eligible for issuance to employees enrolled in the ESPP, after factoring a purchase price discount of 15%. Any Common Shares that were issued under the ESPP prior to the purchase period commencing on January 1, 2016 were issued at a purchase price discount of 5%.
Share Repurchase Plan
On July 28, 2015, the Board authorized the repurchase of up to $200 million of Common Shares (Share Repurchase Plan). Shares may be repurchased from time to time in the open market, private purchases through forward, derivative, accelerated repurchase or automatic repurchase transactions or otherwise. The timing of any repurchase will depend on market conditions, our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and other factors.recorded no interest expense.
During the year ended June 30, 2016,2018, we repurchased and cancelled approximately 1.5 million Common Shares for approximately $65.5 million, under our Share Repurchase Plan (Fiscal 2015—nil). Of the $65.5 million repurchased, $55.7 million was recorded to retained earnings to reflect the difference between the market price of Common Shares repurchased and their book value.
On July 26, 2016, our Board of Directors authorized a new share repurchase plan for the repurchase of up todrew down $200 million from the Revolver, partially to finance acquisitions (June 30, 2017—$225 million). Additionally, during the year ended June 30, 2018, we repaid $375 million and recorded interest expense of $9.0 million relating to amounts drawn on the Revolver (June 30, 2017—$50 million and $2.6 million, respectively).
For further details relating to our Common Shares, pursuantdebt, please see note 10 "Long-Term Debt" to a normal course issuer bid.our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Shelf Registration Statement
In response to the demand and piggyback registration requests we received pursuant to the registration rights agreement entered into in connection with the acquisition of GXS,On August 30, 2017, we filed a universal shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC, which became effective automatically. On May 10, 2016, we filed a post-effective Amendment No. 1 to the shelf registration statement to make the base prospectus included therein consistent with the updated Canadian base shelf short-form prospectus (as amended, theautomatically (the Shelf Registration Statement). The Shelf Registration Statement allows for primary and secondary offerings from time to time of equity, debt and other securities, including Common Shares, Preference Shares, debt securities, depositary shares, warrants, purchase contracts, units and subscription receipts. A base shelf short-form prospectus qualifying the distribution of such securities has also beenwas concurrently filed with certain Canadian securities regulators.regulators on August 30, 2017. The type of securities and the specific terms thereof will be determined at the time of any offering and will be described in the applicable prospectus supplement to be filed separately with the SEC and such Canadian securities regulators.
Pensions
As of June 30, 2016,2019, our total unfunded pension plan obligations were $64.9$77.5 million, of which $2.9$2.3 million is payable within the next 12twelve months. We expect to be able to make the long-term and short-term payments related to these obligations in the normal course of operations.

Our anticipated payments under our most significant plans for the fiscal years indicated below are as follows:
 Fiscal years ending June 30,
 CDT GXS GER GXS PHP
2017$589
 $772
 $30
2018630
 863
 37
2019705
 922
 96
2020771
 973
 59
2021853
 987
 84
2022 to 20265,041
 5,456
 1,243
Total$8,589
 $9,973
 $1,549
 Fiscal years ending June 30,
 CDT GXS GER GXS PHP
2020$675
 $1,012
 $161
2021758
 1,011
 153
2022832
 1,044
 352
2023933
 1,043
 208
20241,041
 1,050
 272
2025 to 20286,009
 5,308
 2,389
Total$10,248
 $10,468
 $3,535
For a detailed discussion on all pensions, see note 11 "Pension Plans and Other Post Retirement Benefits" to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Commitments and Contractual Obligations
As of June 30, 2016,2019, we have entered into the following contractual obligations with minimum payments for the indicated fiscal periods as follows:
Payments due betweenPayments due between
Total July 1, 2016—
June 30, 2017
 July 1, 2017—
June 30, 2019
 July 1, 2019—
June 30, 2021
 July 1, 2021
and beyond
Total July 1, 2019—
June 30, 2020
 July 1, 2020—
June 30, 2022
 July 1, 2022—
June 30, 2024
 July 1, 2024
and beyond
Long-term debt obligations(1)$2,961,817
 $113,854
 $226,916
 $954,797
 $1,666,250
$3,408,565
 $147,059
 $292,156
 $1,045,567
 $1,923,783
Operating lease obligations*184,798
 42,374
 65,095
 40,738
 36,591
Operating lease obligations (2)
318,851
 72,853
 106,394
 59,441
 80,163
Purchase obligations7,543
 5,635
 1,787
 121
 
11,280
 8,364
 2,747
 169
 
$3,154,158
 $161,863
 $293,798
 $995,656
 $1,702,841
$3,738,696
 $228,276
 $401,297
 $1,105,177
 $2,003,946
*(1) Includes interest up to maturity and principal payments. Please see note 10 "Long-Term Debt" for more details.
(2)Net of $6.9$30.7 million of sublease income to be received from properties which we have subleased to third parties.
The long-term debt obligations are comprised of interest and principal payments on Senior Notes and credit facilities. See note 10 "Long-Term Debt" to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Guarantees and Indemnifications
We have entered into customer agreements which may include provisions to indemnify our customers against third party claims that our software products or services infringe certain third party intellectual property rights and for liabilities related to a breach of our confidentiality obligations. We have not made any material payments in relation to such indemnification provisions and have not accrued any liabilities related to these indemnification provisions in our Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements.
Occasionally, we enter into financial guarantees with third parties in the ordinary course of our business, including, among others, guarantees relating to taxes and letters of credit on behalf of parties with whom we conduct business. Such agreements have not had a material effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Litigation
We are currently involved in various claims and legal proceedings.
Quarterly, we review the status of each significant legal matter and evaluate such matters to determine how they should be treated for accounting and disclosure purposes in accordance with the requirements of ASC Topic 450-20 "Loss Contingencies" (Topic 450-20). Specifically, this evaluation process includes the centralized tracking and itemization of the status of all our disputes and litigation items, discussing the nature of any litigation and claim, including any dispute or claim that is reasonably likely to result in litigation, with relevant internal and external counsel, and assessing the progress of each matter in light of its merits and our experience with similar proceedings under similar circumstances.
If the potential loss from any claim or legal proceeding is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated, we accrue a liability for the estimated loss in accordance with Topic 450-20. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the aggregate of such estimated losses werewas not material to our consolidated financial position or results of operations and we do not believe as of the date of this filing that it is reasonably possible that a loss exceeding the amounts already recognized will be incurred that would be material to our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Contingencies
IRS Matter
As we have previously disclosed, the United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is examining certain of our tax returns for our fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 (Fiscal 2010) through our fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 (Fiscal 2012), and in connection with those examinations is reviewing our internal reorganization in Fiscal 2010 to consolidate certain intellectual property ownership in Luxembourg and Canada and our integration of certain acquisitions into the resulting structure. We also previously disclosed that the examinations may lead to proposed adjustments to our taxes that may be material, individually or in the aggregate, and that we have not recorded any material accruals for any such potential adjustments in our Consolidated Financial Statements.
AsWe previously disclosed that, as part of these examinations, (which are ongoing), on July 17, 2015 we received from the IRS aan initial Notice of Proposed Adjustment (“NOPA”)(NOPA) in draft form, proposingthat, as revised by the IRS on July 11, 2018 proposes a one-time approximately $280$335 million increase to our U.S. federal taxes arising from the reorganization in Fiscal 2010 and proposing(the 2010 NOPA), plus penalties equal to 20% of the additional proposed taxes plusfor Fiscal 2010, and interest at the applicable statutory rate (which will continue to accrue untilpublished by the matter is resolved and may be substantial). A NOPA is an IRS position and does not impose an obligation to pay tax. TheIRS.
On July 11, 2018, we also received, consistent with previously disclosed expectations, a draft NOPA may be changed before the final NOPA is issued, including because the IRS reserved the right in the draft NOPA to increase the adjustment. Based on discussions with the IRS, we expect we will receive an additional NOPA proposing ana one time approximately $80 million increase to our U.S. federal taxes for Fiscal 2012 (the 2012 NOPA) arising from the integration of Global 360 Holding Corp. into the structure that resulted from the internal reorganization accompanied byin Fiscal 2010, plus penalties equal to 40% of the additional proposed taxes for Fiscal 2012, and interest.
On January 7, 2019, we received from the IRS official notification of proposed adjustments to our taxable income for Fiscal 2010 and Fiscal 2012, together with the 2010 NOPA and 2012 NOPA in final form. In each case, such documentation was as expected and on substantially the same terms as provided for in the previously disclosed respective draft NOPAs, with the exception of an additional proposed penalty as part of the 2012 NOPA.
A NOPA is an IRS position and does not impose an obligation to pay tax. We continue to strongly disagree with the IRS’ positions within the NOPAs and we are vigorously contesting the proposed adjustments to our taxable income, along with any proposed penalties and interest (although there can be no assurance that this will beinterest.
As of our receipt of the amount reflected in thefinal 2010 NOPA when received, including becauseand 2012 NOPA, our estimated potential aggregate liability, as proposed by the IRS, may assign a higher value to our intellectual property). Depending upon the outcome of these matters,including additional state income taxes plus penalties and interest that may be due. We currently estimate that, as of June 30, 2016, adjustments under the draft NOPA in its present form and the anticipated additional NOPA could result in an aggregate liabilitydue, was approximately $770 million, comprised of approximately $550$455 million inclusive ofin U.S. federal and state taxes, approximately $130 million of penalties, and approximately $185 million of interest. Interest will continue to accrue at the applicable statutory rates until the matter is resolved and may be substantial.
WeAs previously disclosed and noted above, we strongly disagree with the IRS’ positionpositions and intend towe are vigorously contestcontesting the proposed adjustments to our taxable income.income, along with the proposed penalties and interest. We are examining various alternatives available to taxpayers to contest the proposed adjustments.adjustments, including through IRS Appeals and U.S. Federal court. Any such alternatives could involve a lengthy process and result in the incurrence of significant expenses. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have not recorded any material accruals in respect of these examinations in our Consolidated Financial Statements. An adverse outcome of these tax examinations could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.
For additional information regarding the history of this IRS matter, please see Note 13 "Guarantees and Contingencies" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for Fiscal 2018.
CRA Matter
As part of its ongoing audit of our acquisitionCanadian tax returns, the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) has disputed our transfer pricing methodology used for certain intercompany transactions with our international subsidiaries and has issued notices of GXS,reassessment for Fiscal 2012, Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2014. Assuming the utilization of available tax attributes (further described below), we estimate our potential aggregate liability, as of June 30, 2019, in connection with the CRA's reassessments for Fiscal 2012, Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2014 to be limited to penalties and interest that may be due of approximately $25 million.
The notices of reassessment for Fiscal 2012, Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2014 would, as drafted, increase our taxable income by approximately $90 million to $100 million for each of those years, as well as impose a 10% penalty on the proposed adjustment to income.
We strongly disagree with the CRA's positions and believe the reassessments of Fiscal 2012, Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2014 (including any penalties) are without merit. We have filed notices of objection for Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2013, and we are currently seeking competent authority consideration under applicable international treaties in respect of these reassessments. We intend to file the notice of objection for Fiscal 2014 shortly.

Even if we are unsuccessful in challenging the CRA's reassessments to increase our taxable income for Fiscal 2012, Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2014, or potential reassessments that may be proposed for subsequent years currently under audit, we have inheritedelective deductions available for those years (including carry-backs from later years) that would offset such increased amounts so that no additional cash tax would be payable, exclusive of any assessed penalties and interest, as described above.
We will continue to vigorously contest the proposed adjustments to our taxable income and any penalty and interest assessments. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have not recorded any accruals in respect of these reassessments in our Consolidated Financial Statements. Audits by the CRA of our tax returns for fiscal years prior to Fiscal 2012 have been completed with no reassessment of our income tax liability in respect of our international transactions, including the transfer pricing methodology applied to them. The CRA is currently auditing Fiscal 2015, Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2017 and have proposed to reassess Fiscal 2015 in a tax disputemanner consistent with Fiscal 2012, Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2014. We are engaged in ongoing discussions with the CRA and continue to vigorously contest the CRA's audit positions.
GXS Brazil Matter
As previously disclosed and in connection with the intercompany charges between the Company’sGXS Group, Inc. and its subsidiary, GXS Tecnologia da Informação (Brasil) Ltda. (GXS Brazil), and the municipality of São Paulo, in connection with GXS Brazil’s judicial appeal of a tax claim in the amount of $2.5 million as of June 30, 2016. We currently have in place a bank guarantee in the amount of $3.7 million in recognition of this dispute. However, we believe that the position of the São Paulo tax authorities is not consistent with the relevant facts and based on information available on the case and other similar matters provided by local counsel, we believe that we can defend our position and that no tax is owed. Although we believe that the facts support our position, the ultimate outcome of this matter could result in a loss of up to the claim amount discussed above, plus future interest or penalties that may accrue.
Historically, prior to our acquisition of GXS, GXS would charge certain costs to its subsidiaries, including GXS Brazil, primarily based on historical transfer pricing studies, that were intended to reflect the costs incurred by subsidiariesapproximately $1.5 million accrued in relation to services provided bythis matter became statute barred during the parent company to the subject subsidiary. year ended June 30, 2019 and accordingly was released as a recovery under "Special charges".
GXS recorded taxes on amounts billed, that were considered to be due based on the intercompany charges. GXS subsequently re-evaluated its intercompany charges to GXS Brazil and related taxes and, upon taking into consideration the current environment and judicial proceedings in Brazil, concluded that it was probable that certain indirect taxes would be assessable and payable based upon the accrual of such intercompany charges and has approximately $4.9 million accrued for the probable amount of a settlement related to the indirect taxes, interest and penalties.India Matter
Our Indian subsidiary, GXS India Technology Centre Private Limited (GXS India), is subject to potential assessments by Indian tax authorities in the city of Bangalore. GXS India has received assessment orders from the Indian tax authorities alleging that the transfer price applied to intercompany transactions was not appropriate. Based on advice from our tax advisors, we believe that the facts that the Indian tax authorities are using to support their assessment are incorrect. We have filed appeals and anticipate an eventual settlement with the Indian tax authorities. We have accrued $1.5$1.3 million to cover our anticipated financial exposure in this matter.
Please also see Part I, Item 1A "Risk Factors" elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Subsequent Events
Internal Reorganization
In July 2016, we implemented a reorganization of our subsidiaries worldwide with the view to continuing to enhance operational and administrative efficiencies through further consolidated ownership, management, and development of our intellectual property (IP) in Canada, continuing to reduce the number of entities in our group and working towards our objective of having a single operating legal entity in each jurisdiction. We believe our reorganization also reduces our exposure to global political and tax uncertainties, particularly in Europe. We believe that further consolidating our IP in Canada will continue to ensure appropriate legal protections for our consolidated IP, simplify legal, accounting and tax compliance, and improve our global cash management.
A material tax benefit, currently expected to be several hundred million dollars, associated with the recognition of a net deferred tax asset is expected to be realized upon the completion of the IP reorganization in the first quarter of Fiscal 2017. This is anticipated to have a material impact of reducing our tax provision in Fiscal 2017 as well as our consolidated income tax rate in Fiscal 2017.
Cash Dividends
As part of our quarterly, non-cumulative cash dividend program, we declared, on July 26, 2016, a dividend of $0.23 per Common Share. The record date for this dividend is August 26, 2016 and the payment date is September 16, 2016. Future declarations of dividends and the establishment of future record and payment dates are subject to the final determination and discretion of our Board of Directors.
Acquisition of Recommind Inc.
On July 20, 2016, we closed our previously announced acquisition of Recommind Inc. (Recommind), a leading provider of eDiscovery and information analytics, by acquiring all of its equity interests for approximately $170 million. Recommind's SaaS and managed services solutions deliver insight from unstructured data to help people make better, faster business decisions. The financial results of Recommind will be consolidated from the closing date in our financial statements for the first quarter of Fiscal 2017.
Share Repurchase Plan
On July 26, 2016, our Board of Directors authorized a new share repurchase plan for the repurchase of up to $200 million of our Common Shares, pursuant to a normal course issuer bid.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not enter into off-balance sheet financing as a matter of practice, except for guarantees relating to taxes and letters of credit on behalf of parties with whom we conduct business, and the use of operating leases for office space, computer equipment, and vehicles. None of the operating leases described in the previous sentence has, and we currently do not believe that they potentially may have, a material effect on our financial condition, revenues, expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, neither the lease liability nor the underlying asset is carried on the balance sheet, as the terms of the leases do not meet the criteria for capitalization.



Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are primarily exposed to market risks associated with fluctuations in interest rates on our term loans, revolving loans and foreign currency exchange rates.
Interest rate risk
Our exposure to interest rate fluctuations relate primarily to our Term Loan B.B and, if drawn, the Revolver.
As of June 30, 2016,2019, we had an outstanding balance of $780.0$987.5 million on Term Loan B. Term Loan B bears a floating interest rate of 2.5%1.75% plus the higher of LIBOR or 0.75%.LIBOR. As of June 30, 2016,2019, an adverse change of one percent on the interest rate would have the effect of increasing our annual interest payment on Term Loan B by approximately $7.8$9.9 million, assuming that the loan balance as of June 30, 20162019 is outstanding for the entire period.
At Juneperiod (June 30, 2015, an adverse change of one percent would have had2018—$10.0 million). No amounts were drawn on the effect of increasing our annual interest payments on Term Loan B by approximately $7.9 million, assuming that the loan balance was outstanding for the entire period.Revolver during Fiscal 2019.
Foreign currency risk
Foreign currency transaction risk
We transact business in various foreign currencies. Our foreign currency exposures typically arise from intercompany fees, intercompany loans and other intercompany transactions that are expected to be cash settled in the near term. We expect that we will continue to realize gains or losses with respect to our foreign currency exposures. Our ultimate realized gain or loss with respect to foreign currency exposures will generally depend on the size and type of cross-currency transactions that we

enter into, the currency exchange rates associated with these exposures and changes in those rates. Additionally, we have hedged certain of our Canadian dollar foreign currency exposures relating to our payroll expenses in Canada.
Based on the foreign exchange forward contracts outstanding as atof June 30, 2016,2019, a one cent change in the Canadian dollar to U.S. dollar exchange rate would have caused a change of approximately $0.3$0.6 million in the mark to market on our existing foreign exchange forward contracts.
At Junecontracts (June 30, 2015, a one cent change in the Canadian dollar to U.S. dollar exchange rate would have caused a change of approximately $0.8 million in the mark to market on our existing foreign exchange forward contracts.2018—$0.5 million).
Foreign currency translation risk
Our reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. Fluctuations in foreign currencies impact the amount of total assets and liabilities that we report for our foreign subsidiaries upon the translation of these amounts into U.S. dollars. In particular, the amount of cash and cash equivalents that we report in U.S. dollars for a significant portion of the cash held by these subsidiaries is subject to translation variance caused by changes in foreign currency exchange rates as of the end of each respective reporting period (the offset to which is recorded to accumulated other comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheets).
The following table shows our cash and cash equivalents denominated in certain major foreign currencies as of June 30, 20162019 (equivalent in U.S. dollar):
 U.S. Dollar
Equivalent at
June 30,
(In thousands) 2016 2015 U.S. Dollar
Equivalent at
June 30, 2019
 U.S. Dollar
Equivalent at
June 30, 2018
Euro $182,524
 $125,411
 $120,417
 $120,346
British Pound 29,572
 28,634
 33,703
 31,211
Canadian Dollar 22,103
 21,358
 12,635
 24,590
Swiss Franc 30,298
 12,364
 56,776
 52,652
Other foreign currencies 72,107
 55,996
 105,273
 117,459
Total cash and cash equivalents denominated in foreign currencies 336,604
 243,763
 328,804
 346,258
U.S. dollar 947,153
 456,236
 612,205
 336,684
Total cash and cash equivalents $1,283,757
 $699,999
 $941,009
 $682,942
If overall foreign currency exchange rates in comparison to the U.S. dollar uniformly weakened by 10%, the amount of

cash and cash equivalents we would report in equivalent U.S. dollars would decrease by approximately $33.7$32.9 million (June 30, 2015—2018—$24.434.6 million), assuming we have not entered into any derivatives discussed above under "Foreign Currency Transaction Risk".
Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The response to this Item 8 is submitted as a separate section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. See Part IV, Item 15.
Item 9.    Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.


Item 9A.    Controls and Procedures
(A) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, our management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of June 30, 2016,2019, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act were recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file under the Exchange Act (according to Rule 13(a)-15(e)) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(B) Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). ICFR is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. ICFR includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with the authorizations of our management and our directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.
Our management assessed our ICFR as of June 30, 2016,2019, the end of our most recent fiscal year. In making our assessment, our management used the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Our management has excluded from our evaluation the ICFR of ANXe Business Corporation (ANX)Liaison Technologies Inc. (Liaison), which we acquired on May 1, 2016,December 17, 2018, as discussed in note 18 "Acquisitions" to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Total revenues subject to ANX'sLiaison's ICFR represented 0.4%approximately 1.9% of our consolidated total revenues for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016.2019. Total assets subject to ANX'sLiaison's ICFR represented 2.5%approximately 4.7% of our consolidated total assets as of June 30, 2016.2019 (of which approximately $321.1 million represents goodwill and net intangible assets subject to our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2019).
Based on the results of our evaluation, our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our ICFR was effective as of June 30, 2016.2019.
The results of our management’s assessment waswere reviewed with our Audit Committee and the conclusion that our ICFR was effective as of June 30, 20162019 has been audited by KPMG LLP, anour independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included in Part IV, Item 15 of this Annual Report.
Our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, do not expect that our disclosure controls or our ICFR will prevent or detect all error or all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system's objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute

assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Any evaluation of prospective control effectiveness, with respect to future periods, is subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.


(C) Attestation Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
KPMG LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, has issued a report under Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing Standard No. 5 on the effectiveness of our ICFR. See Part IV, Item 815 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(D) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting (ICFR)
Based on the evaluation completed by our management, in which our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer participated, our management has concluded that there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 20162019 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Other Matters

As of June 30, 2019, in anticipation of our adoption of ASU No. 2016-02 “Leases (Topic 842)”, we were in the process of finalizing certain changes to our policies, procedures, information systems and the related control activities, to monitor and maintain appropriate internal controls over financial reporting. These changes in policies and procedures, information systems and the related control activities were implemented in July 2019.


PART
Part III
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The following table sets forth certain information as to our directors and executive officers as of July 25, 2016.2019.
Name AgeOffice and Position Currently Held With Company
Mark J. Barrenechea5154Vice Chair, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Technology Officer, Director
Steve MurphyMadhu Ranganathan47President
John M. Doolittle5255Executive Vice President, and Chief Financial Officer
Savinay Berry43Senior Vice President, Cloud Service Delivery
Gordon A. Davies5457Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate SecretaryDevelopment
Prentiss Donohue4649Senior Vice President, Professional ServicesPortfolio Group
Paul Duggan44Senior Vice President, Revenue Operations
Simon Harrison4649SeniorExecutive Vice President, EnterpriseWorldwide Sales
Adam Howatson34Chief Marketing Officer
David Jamieson5154Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer
Aditya Maheshwari4245Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
Muhi Majzoub5659Executive Vice President, Engineering
James McGourlay4750SeniorExecutive Vice President, Global Technical ServicesCustomer Operations
Leslie SarauerPatricia E. Nagle54Senior Vice President, Human ResourcesChief Marketing Officer
George SchulzeBrian Sweeney6055Senior Vice President, Business Network Sales
Gary Weiss49Senior Vice President, Cloud ServicesChief Human Resources Officer
P. Thomas Jenkins5659Chairman of the Board
Randy Fowlie (2)(3)
5659Director
Gail E. Hamilton (2)
Major General David Fraser (3)
6662Director
Brian J. Jackman
Gail E. Hamilton (1)
7569Director
Stephen J. Sadler6568Director
Michael Slaunwhite (1)(3)
Harmit Singh (2)
5556Director
Katharine B. Stevenson (2)
Michael Slaunwhite (1)(3)
5458Director
Katharine B. Stevenson (2)
57Director
Carl Jürgen Tinggren (2)
61Director
Deborah Weinstein (1)(3)
5659Director
(1)Member of the Compensation Committee.
(2)Member of the Audit Committee.
(3)Member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.
Mark J. Barrenechea
Mr. Barrenechea joined OpenText in January 2012 as the President and Chief Executive Officer. In January 2016, Mr. Barrenechea stepped down as President and assumedtook on the role of Chief Technology Officer, while remaining the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. In September 2017, Mr. Barrenechea was appointed Vice Chair, in addition to remaining the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Technology Officer. Before joining OpenText, Mr. Barrenechea was President and Chief Executive Officer of Silicon Graphics International Corporation (SGI), where he also served as a member of the Board. During Mr. Barrenechea's tenure at SGI, he led strategy and execution, which included transformative acquisition of assets, as well as penetrating diverse new markets and geographic regions. Mr. Barrenechea also served as a director of SGI from 2006 to 2012. Prior to SGI, Mr. Barrenechea served as Executive Vice President and CTO for CA, Inc. (CA), (formerly Computer Associates International, Inc.) from 2003 to 2006 and was a member of the executive management team. Before going to CA, Mr. Barrenechea was the Senior Vice President of Applications Development at Oracle Corporation from 1997 to 2003, managing a multi-thousand person global team while

serving as a member of the executive management team. From 1994 to 1997, Mr. Barrenechea served as Vice President of Development at Scopus, a software applications company. Prior to Scopus, Mr. Barrenechea was the Vice

President of Development at Tesseract, where he was responsible for reshaping the company's line of CRM and human capital management software. Mr. Barrenechea serves as a member of the Board and Audit Committee of Dick's Sporting Goods.Goods and also serves as a board member of Avery Dennison Corporation. In the past five years, Mr. Barrenechea also served as a director of Hamilton Insurance Group. Mr. Barrenechea holds a Bachelor of Science degree in computer science from Saint Michael's College. Mr. Barrenechea has authored several books includingThe Intelligent and Connected Enterprise, The Golden Age of Innovation, Digital Manufacturing, Digital Financial Services, On Digital, Digital: Disrupt or Die, eGovernment or Out of Government, Enterprise Information Management: The Next Generation of Enterprise Software, Software Rules and e-Business or out of Business.
Steve MurphyMadhu Ranganathan
Mr. MurphyMs. Ranganathan joined OpenText as itsExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer in April 2018. With more than 25 years of financial leadership experience, Ms. Ranganathan most recently served as the Chief Financial Officer for [24]7.ai from June 2008 to March 2018. Ms. Ranganathan also held senior financial roles at Rackable Systems from December 2005 to May 2008, Redback Networks from August 2002 to November 2005, and Backweb Technologies from December 1996 to January 20162000. She also has public accounting experience with PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLC. Ms. Ranganathan currently serves as Board Member for Akamai Technologies. In the past five years she served as a Board Member of ServiceSource and Watermark, a Bay Area organization focused on professional development for women. Ms. Ranganathan holds an MBA in Finance from the University of Massachusetts, is a Certified Public Accountant in California and a Chartered Accountant (India).
Savinay Berry
Mr. Berry has served as the Company's Senior Vice President, Cloud Service Delivery since January 2019. He is responsible for all customer-facing activitiesOpenText Cloud Services, including Sales, Marketing, Partners & Alliances, Global Technicalinfrastructure, Service Delivery, Managed Services, Customer Support,eDiscovery, Security Cloud Services and Professional Services Sales Operationsin the Philippines. Prior to this role, Mr. Berry served as Vice President, Engineering and Cloud Services.Products from 2017 to 2019. Prior to joining OpenText, Mr. Murphy brings more than 20 years of experience in technologyBerry was Vice President, Product Management at Dell EMC from 2015 to 2017 and Director, Advanced Product and Technology at Intuit from 2013 to 2014. He also served as an operations and logistics executive, including leadership positions at Oracle Corporation (Oracle), Sun Microsystems Inc. (Sun Microsystems), Accenture plc (Accenture) and Procter & Gamble Co (P&G). Mr. Murphy held a number of different sales and logistics roles at Oracle and Sun Microsystems, including Senior Vice President of ServicesProduct Management at Empowered Inc (acquired by Qualcomm) from 2011 to 2012 and from 2008 to 2011, Mr. Berry served as Principal, Granite Ventures. Mr. Berry holds both a Bachelor and Master’s Degree in North America for Oracle from June 2013 to December 2015,Electrical and Vice PresidentComputer Engineering and General Manager for Sun Microsystems, which was acquired by Oracle in 2010, from November 2004 to May 2013. Mr. Murphy also held various positions in manufacturing, logistics operations and technology deployment at Accenture from 1998 to 2000 and at P&G from 1991 to 1996. Mr. Murphy has an MBA from Harvard BusinessKellogg School and a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from University California, Davis.
John Doolittle
Mr. Doolittle joined OpenText as Chief Financial Officer in September 2014. Mr. Doolittle has experience in taxation, financial planning and analysis, treasury, and mergers and acquisitions. With more than 20 years of financial experience, Mr. Doolittle was most recently the Chief Financial Officer of Mattamy Homes from 2012 to 2014. Prior to joining Mattamy, Mr. Doolittle held senior financial roles with Nortel Networks Corporation, including serving as its Chief Financial Officer from 2009 to 2012. In the past, Mr. Doolittle has also served as the Vice-President of Finance for the Bank of Montreal’s Global Treasury Group from 1997 to 1999. Mr. Doolittle holds a Bachelor of Commerce degree from McMaster University and is a Chartered Professional Accountant (Ontario) (1988).Management at Northwestern University.
Gordon A. Davies
Mr. Davies joined OpenText as Chief Legal Officer in September 2009. Mr. Davies also serves as the Company's Corporate Secretary and Chief Compliance Officer, and has responsibility for Corporate Development and the Program Management Office.Corporate Secretary Group. Prior to joining OpenText, Mr. Davies was the Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary of Nortel Networks Corporation. During his sixteen years at Nortel, Mr. Davies acted as Deputy General Counsel and Corporate Secretary during 2008, and as interim Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary in 2005 and again in 2007. He led the Corporate Securities legal team as General Counsel-Corporate from 2003, with responsibility for providing legal support on all corporate and securities law matters, and spent five years in Europe supporting all aspects of the Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) business, ultimately as General Counsel, EMEA. Prior to joining Nortel, Mr. Davies practiced securities law at a major Toronto law firm. Mr. Davies holds an LL.B and an MBA from the University of Ottawa, and a B.A. from the University of British Columbia. He is a member of the Law Society of Upper Canada, the Canadian Bar Association, the Association of Canadian General Counsel and the Society of Corporate Secretaries and Governance Professionals.
Prentiss Donohue
Mr. Donohue joined OpenTexthas served as Senior Vice President, Portfolio group since January 2019. Prior to this role, Mr. Donohue served as Senior Vice President of Professional Services infrom April 2016.2016 to January 2019. He brings over 20 years of experience in support and services management. Prior to joining OpenText, Mr. Donohue served as Group Vice President and General Manager of Advanced Customer Services for Oracle Corporation from January 2010 to March 2016, where he was responsible for driving Oracle’s innovative software, systems and cloud services. From April 1998 to December 2010, Mr. Donohue worked at Sun Microsystems in various leadership roles, including in Managed Services Management and Corporate Marketing. Mr. Donohue served on the board of directors of Summit Charter School until May 2016. Mr. Donohue holds a BA from the University of Colorado and has completed executive leadership programs at the University of Michigan’s Ross School of Business and the University of Hong Kong.

Paul Duggan
Mr. Duggan joined OpenText as Senior Vice President of Revenue Operations in January 2017. He is responsible for operations across sales, professional services, business networks, and customer support. Prior to joining OpenText, Mr. Duggan held various roles at Oracle Corporation, including Group Vice President of Support Renewal Sales, North America from December 1999 to January 2017. Previously, Mr. Duggan served on the advisory board for the Technology Services Industry Association from 2016 to 2017. He has completed executive leadership programs at the University of Michigan Ross School of Business and IESE Business School in Barcelona, Spain.
Simon Harrision
Mr. Harrison has served as the Company’s SeniorExecutive Vice President of EnterpriseWorldwide Sales since May 2015.October 2017. Prior to this, Mr. Harrison, who joined the Company through its acquisition of IXOS AG, has held a number of senior leadership roles, including serving as its Senior Vice President of Enterprise Sales from 2015 to 2017, Senior Vice President of Fast Growth Markets from 2014 to 2015 and as the Company’s Senior Vice President of Sales for the EMEA region from 2012 to 2014. Mr. Harrison holds an honors degree in Computer Science from Leeds University.

Adam Howatson
Mr. Howatson has served as the Company's Chief Marketing Officer (CMO) since October 2014. Prior to becoming CMO, Mr. Howatson held a number of positions at OpenText, which include serving in Engineering from March 2013 to September 2014, Office of The President/PMO during 2012, and Product Management from 2006 to 2012. Prior to that, he also held roles in Technical Marketing, Mergers & Acquisitions, and Information Technology. Mr. Howatson currently serves as a director of LogiSense Corporation. Mr. Howatson also served on the national board of directors for the Information Technology Association of Canada (ITAC) from June 2013 to September 2014. Mr. Howatson holds certifications from the University of Waterloo and the Canadian Forces College.
David Jamieson
Mr. Jamieson joined OpenText as the Chief Information Officer in November 2014. He brings over 25 years of experience in leading Information Technology organizations through the ever-changing technology landscape. Prior to joining OpenText, Mr. Jamieson worked at Barrick Gold Corporation, where he served as Director of Information Technology for four years before being appointed as the Vice President of Information Management and Technology in 2005. Mr. Jamieson has held senior positions with companies, such as Universal Studios Canada from 1999 to 2001, EDS/SHL Systemhouse from 1996 to 1999, and Canadian Pacific Railway from 1988 to 1996. Mr. Jamieson holds a Bachelor of Applied Science, Mechanical Engineering from the University of Toronto and received his Professional Engineer designation in 1990.
Aditya Maheshwari
Mr. Maheshwari joined OpenText as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer in February 2016. Prior to joining OpenText, Mr. Maheshwari was an Audit Partner in the Technology, Media and TelecomsTelecommunications practice at KPMG LLP, Canada until February 5, 2016. With 15 years of experience at KPMG including international postings in the UK and India, Mr. Maheshwari has the experience of working with several large multinational companies under U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. Mr. Maheshwari represented Canada on KPMG's global think-tank for the Technology sector and is the co-author of 11 technical and thought-leadership publications, published by KPMG, on revenue recognition for the Technology, Media and TelecomsTelecommunications sector. During his tenure in the UK, Mr. Maheshwari worked in KPMG's technical accounting group, International Standards Group, specializing in revenue recognition. Mr. Maheshwari is a Chartered Professional Accountant (Ontario), Certified Public Accountant (Colorado) and Chartered Accountant (India).
Muhi Majzoub
Mr. Majzoub has served as Executive Vice President, Engineering since January 2016. Prior to that he served as Senior Vice President, Engineering from June 2012 to January 2016. Mr. Majzoub is responsible for managing product development cycles, global development organization and driving internal operations and development processes. Mr. Majzoub is a seasoned enterprise software technology executive having recently served as Head of Products for NorthgateArinso, a private company that provides global Human Resources software and services. Prior to this, Mr. Majzoub was Senior Vice President of Product Development for CA, Technologies from June 2004 to July 2010. Mr. Majzoub also worked for several years as Vice President for Product Development at Oracle Corporation from January 1989 to June 2004. Mr. Majzoub attended San Francisco State University.
James McGourlay
Mr. McGourlay has served as Executive Vice President, Customer Operations since October 2017. Prior to this, Mr. McGourlay was the Company's Senior Vice President of Global Technical Services sincefrom May 2015. Prior2015 to this, Mr. McGourlay was the Company'sOctober 2017 and Senior Vice President of Worldwide Customer Service from February 2012 to May 2015. Mr. McGourlay joined OpenText in 1997 and held progressive positions in information technology, technical support, product support and special projects, including, Director, Customer Service and Vice President, Customer Service in 2005.Service.
Leslie SarauerPatricia Nagle
Ms. Sarauer joined OpenTextNagle has served as Senior Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer since February 2018 and is responsible for all marketing and demand generation initiatives, including field marketing, programs, events, product marketing, industry

marketing, demonstrations, partners and alliances as well as inside sales. Prior to this role, Ms. Nagle held various positions within the Company since joining OpenText in 2007, including Vice President of Global Partners and Strategic Alliances, from January 2007 to February 2018. Prior to joining OpenText, Ms. Nagle was SVP of World Wide Sales, Services and Marketing at Percussion Software, where she was responsible for direct and indirect sales and all customer facing, external media communications, client satisfaction and demand generation activities globally. Ms. Nagle holds a BA in Business Administration, a BA in Economics and a concentration in Marketing from the University of New Hampshire as well as an MBA in Business Administration & Management from Harvard University.
Brian Sweeney
Mr. Sweeney joined OpenText as Chief Human Resources Officer in April 2016. She brings with herOctober 2018. He has over 25 years of diverse experience as a Human Resource (HR) leader in both the corporatehigh growth, global technology businesses, and professional services settings. Prior to joining OpenText, Ms. Sarauer held various senior leadership roles at Agrium Inc., including Senior Director, Corporate HR & Organizational Development from July 2012 to August 2014; Senior Director, Wholesales Human Resources from September 2006 to June 2012; and Senior Director, Total Compensation from January 2004 to August 2006. Ms. Sarauer also held various roles at Mercer Human Resources Consulting, including Principle Consultant, Executive Compensation from April 1997 to August 2002. Ms. Sarauer holds a Bachelor of Arts in Economics and a Bachelor of Laws from Queen’s University. She also attended the Advanced HR Executive Program at the Ross School of Business of the University of Michigan.

George Schulze
Mr. Schulze has served as the Senior Vice President of Business Network Sales (previously Information Exchange Sales) for OpenText since May 2015. Mr. Schulze came to OpenText through its January 2014 acquisition of GXS Inc. (GXS). Mr. Schulze joined GXS in 2005 as Vice President of Sales for the Americas region. During Mr. Schulze’s 30-year career in Information Technology serving Fortune 500 companies, he has performed a wide variety of roles including Vice President and Managing Director of Sales at BearingPoint and Managing Director of KPMG.consulting. He has also previously served as Vice President/General Manager of the Americas for 724 Solutions, Vice President of Global Sales for SCC Communicationsled organizational growth and held various salestransformation initiatives, including international expansion, M&A, global talent management, positions at Tandem Computers Inc., Digital Equipment Corporationcompensation and Wang Laboratories Inc. Mr. Schulze holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering from Lehigh University.
Gary Weiss
Mr. Weiss was appointed to Senior Vice President, Cloud Services in September 2014. Mr. Weiss joined OpenText in 2012 as the SVP of the Information Exchange business unit.benefits, employee engagement, communication and cultural transformation. Prior to joining OpenText, Mr. WeissSweeney worked at CA,Amgen Inc. (formerly Computer Associates International, Inc.) from 2003 to 2011. During his tenure2008, where he served in various HR leadership roles, including Global VP of HR, Head of HR for Global R&D, and VP of International Human Resources. Prior to this, Mr. Sweeney worked at CA,Dell, where he served as Director of Worldwide Compensation and Benefits from 1999 to 1997 and HR Director from 1997 to 2001. From 1989 to 1992, Mr. Weiss held various executive level positions, including SVP of Sales for the Security business, SVP, Business Development and Alliances, andSweeney was a memberHuman Resources consultant at AON Hewitt Associates, working across multiple client industry sectors in the practice areas of employee benefits and executive compensation. Earlier in his professional career, Mr. Sweeney worked in corporate sales and sales management for Steelcase, Inc. Mr. Sweeney holds an MBA from the Senior Leadership team at CAUniversity of Michigan and a Bachelor’s degree in Sociology from 2009 to 2011. Mr. Weiss has also worked as an independent consultant to small- to mid-size security organizations for many years. He began his career in Information Technology in 1993 as one of the first sales executives at Security Dynamics (later renamed RSA Security) before joining e-Security in 2001 to lead the North American Sales, Channel, and Technology Services. Mr. Weiss holds a B.A. from TulaneVanderbilt University.
P. Thomas Jenkins
Mr. Jenkins is ChairmanChair of the Board of OpenText. From 1994 to 2005, Mr. Jenkins was President, then Chief Executive Officer and then from 2005 to 2013, Chief Strategy Officer of OpenText. Mr. Jenkins has served as a Director of OpenText since 1994 and as its Chairman since 1998. In addition to his OpenText responsibilities, Mr. Jenkins is the tenth ChancellorChair of the UniversityWorld Wide Web Foundation, a Commissioner of Waterloo.the Tri-Lateral Commission, founding Chair of the Ontario Global 100 (OG100) and Canadian Co-Chair of the Atlantik Bruecke. Currently, Mr. Jenkins is a board member of Manulife Financial Corporation. In the past five years, Mr. Jenkins also served as a board member of Thomson Reuters Inc., Manulife Financial Corporation, and TransAlta.TransAlta Corporation. He iswas the tenth Chancellor of the University of Waterloo and was the Chair of the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) and Canadian Chair of the Atlantik Bruecke, a director of the C.D. Howe Institute, and a director of the Business Council of Canada (formerly Canadian Council of Chief Executives) and an Executive Fellow at the School of Public Policy at the University of Calgary.. Mr. Jenkins received an M.B.A. from Schulich School of Business at York University, an M.A.Sc. from the University of Toronto and a B.Eng. & Mgt. from McMaster University. Mr. Jenkins received honorary doctorates from the University of Waterloo, Carleton University, Royal Military College, McMaster University and York University.six universities. He is a member of the Waterloo Region Entrepreneur Hall of Fame, a Companion of the Canadian Business Hall of Fame and recipient of the Ontario Entrepreneur of the Year award, the McMaster Engineering L.W. Shemilt Distinguished Alumni Award and the Schulich School of Business Outstanding Executive Leadership award. He is a Fellow of the Canadian Academy of Engineering (FCAE). Mr. Jenkins was awarded the Canadian Forces Decoration (CD) and the Queen's Diamond Jubilee Medal (QJDM). Mr. Jenkins is an Officer of the Order of Canada (OC).
Randy Fowlie
Mr. Fowlie has served as a director of OpenText since March 1998. From March 2011 to April 2017, Mr. Fowlie is currentlywas the President and CEO of RDM Corporation, a leading provider of specialized hardware and software solutions in the electronic payment industry. RDM Corporation trades on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX). Mr. Fowlie operated a consulting practice from July 2006 to December 2010. From January 2005 until July 2006, Mr. Fowlie held the position of Vice President and General Manager, Digital Media, of Harris Corporation, formerly Leitch Technology Corporation (Leitch), a company that was engaged in the design, development, and distribution of audio and video infrastructure to the professional video industry. Leitch was acquired in August 2005 by Harris Corporation. From June 1999 to January 2005, Mr. Fowlie held the position of Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Inscriber Technology Corporation (Inscriber), a computer software company and from February 1998 to June 1999 Mr. Fowlie was the Chief Financial Officer of Inscriber. Inscriber was acquired by Leitch in January 2005. Prior to working at Inscriber Mr. Fowlie was a partner with KPMG LLP, Chartered Accountants, where he worked from 1984 to February 1998. Currently, Mr. Fowlie is also a director at RDM Corporation. Mr. Fowlie received a B.B.A. (Honours) from Wilfrid Laurier University and is a Chartered Professional Accountant. Currently, Mr. Fowlie is also a director of InvestorCom Inc, and Dye & Durham Corporation. In the last five years, Mr. Fowlie also served as a director of Semcan Inc.RDM Corporation.
Major General David Fraser
Major-General (Ret.) David Fraser has served as a director of OpenText since September 2018. Mr. Fraser is the President of Aegis Six Corporation of Toronto. Mr. Fraser was commissioned as an Infantry Officer following graduation from Carleton University with a Bachelor of Arts in 1980. He served in various command and staff positions in the Princess Patricia’s

Canadian Light Infantry from platoon to Division throughout his 30 year career. Most notable, he commanded the NATO coalition in southern Afghanistan in 2006. He is a graduate of the Canadian Forces Command and Staff College in Toronto, holds a Master’s of Management and Policy and is a graduate of the United States Capstone Program (Executive School for generals). His honors and awards including the Commander of Military Merit, the Canadian Meritorious Service Cross, the Meritorious Service Medal, the United States Legion of Honor and Bronze Star (for service in Afghanistan), and awards from the Netherlands, Poland, and NATO. He is the recipient of the Vimy award for contributions to leadership and international affairs and the Atlantic Council Award for international leadership. Upon his departure from the military, Mr. Fraser joined the private sector and, along with his partners, created Blue Goose Pure Foods. Mr. Fraser joined INKAS® Armored Vehicle Manufacturing as their Chief Operating Officer in 2015 until 2017. In 2016, he founded Aegis Six Corporation, which aims at addressing the needs of capacity building abroad and for the private sector within Canada. Mr. Fraser currently works with the Bank of Montreal on their Canadian Defence Community Banking Program, serves as a director of Route1, Inc and the Canadian Forces College Foundation, is a member of The Prince’s Charities Advisory Council as well as the Conference of Defence Association board. Mr. Fraser is also a mentor at the Ivey Business School and is the co-author of Operation Medusa, The Furious Battle that Saved Afghanistan from the Taliban.
Gail E. Hamilton
Ms. Hamilton has served as a director of OpenText since December 2006. For the five years prior thereto, Ms. Hamilton led a team of over 2,000 employees worldwide as Executive Vice President at Symantec Corp (Symantec), an infrastructure software company, and most recently had “P&L” responsibility for their global services and support business. During her five years at Symantec,While leading Symantec's $2B enterprise and consumer business, Ms. Hamilton helped steer the company through an aggressive acquisition strategy. In 2003, Information Security magazine recognized Ms. Hamilton as one of the “20 Women Luminaries” shaping the security industry. Ms. Hamilton has over 20 years of experience growing leading technology and services businesses in the enterprise market. She has extensive management experience at Compaq and Hewlett Packard, as well as Microtec Research. Ms. Hamilton received both a BSEE from the University of Colorado and an MSEE from Stanford University. Currently, Ms. Hamilton is also a director of Arrow Electronics. In the following public companies: Ixia, a provider of application performance and security solutions, Westmoreland Coal Company and Arrow Electronics, Inc, a distributor of components and computer systems.
Brian J. Jackman
Mr. Jackman haspast five years Ms. Hamilton also served as a director of OpenText since December 2002. Mr. Jackman is the PresidentIxia and Westmoreland Coal Company. She was recently named as one of the Jackman Group Inc., a private consulting firm he founded in 2005. From 1982 until his retirement in September 2001, Mr. Jackman held various positions with Tellabs Inc., a U.S. based manufacturer of telecommunications equipment, most recently as Executive Vice President of the company, and President, Global Systems and Technologies division, and as a member of the board of directors of the company. Prior to joining Tellabs Inc., Mr. Jackman worked for IBM Corporation from 1965 to 1982, in a variety of systems, sales and marketing positions. Mr. Jackman also serves as a director of PC-TEL, Incorporated. Mr. Jackman received a B.A from Gannon University and an M.B.A from The Pennsylvania State University.WomenInc.'s 2018 Most Influential Corporate Board Directors.
Stephen J. Sadler
Mr. Sadler has served as a director of OpenText since September 1997. From April 2000 to present, Mr. Sadler has served as the Chairman and CEO of Enghouse Systems Limited, a publicly traded software engineering company that develops geographic information systems as well as contact center systems. Mr. Sadler was previously Chief Financial Officer, President and Chief Executive Officer of GEAC Computer Corporation Ltd. (GEAC). Prior to Mr. Sadler's involvement with GEAC, he held executive positions with Phillips Electronics Limited and Loblaws Companies Limited, and was Chairman of Helix Investments (Canada) Inc. Currently, Mr. Sadler is a director of Enghouse Systems Limited. Mr. Sadler holds a B.A. Sc. (Honours) in Industrial Engineering and an M.B.A. (Dean's List) and he is a Chartered Professional Accountant. In the past five years,
Harmit Singh
Mr. Sadler alsoSingh has served as a director of Frontline TechnologiesOpenText since September 2018. He is the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Levi Strauss & Co., where he is responsible for managing the company’s finance, information technology, strategic sourcing and global business services functions globally. This includes: financial planning and analysis; strategic planning and corporate development; accounting and controls; tax; enterprise risk management; treasury; internal audit; and investor relations. Mr. Singh is a seasoned financial executive with almost 30 years of experience in driving growth for global consumer brands. Prior to joining Levi Strauss & Co. in January 2013, Mr. Singh has served as Chief Financial Officer of Hyatt Hotels Corporation, where he played an instrumental role in successfully establishing a global financial structure, taking the company public, building a strong balance sheet, and driving growth by supporting capital deployment for acquisition and investments. Before Hyatt Hotels Corporation, Mr. Singh held various global leadership roles at Yum! Brands Inc. (formerly Belzberg Technologies, one of the world’s largest restaurant companies, (including acting as Chief Financial Officer of Pizza Hut and Chief Financial Officer of Yum International). Early in his career, Mr. Singh also worked at American Express India and PriceWaterhouse in India. Mr. Singh holds a Bachelor of Commerce from Shri Ram College of Commerce, Delhi University, and is a Chartered Accountant from India. He is also a member of the CNBC Global CFO Council and Wall Street Journal CFO Network. In October 2016, Mr. Singh was named to the board of directors of Buffalo Wild Wings Inc.)., the owner, operator and franchisor of Buffalo Wings® restaurants, where he served as a director and Chair of the Audit Committee until February 2018.


Michael Slaunwhite
Mr. Slaunwhite has served as a director of OpenText since March 1998. Mr. Slaunwhite is presently the Executivehas also been Director and Chairman of HalogenVector Talent Holdings, L.P., the parent holding company of Saba Software, Inc.since 2017. Prior to his appointment at Vector Talent Holdings, Mr. Slaunwhite had served as CEO and Chairman of Halogen Software Inc., a provider of talent management software, from 2000 to August 2006, and as President and Chairman from 1995 to 2000.2000, and as a Director and Chairman from 1995 up to its acquisition by Vector Talent Holdings in 2017. From 1994 to 1995, Mr. Slaunwhite was an independent consultant to a number of companies, assisting them with strategic and financing plans. Mr. Slaunwhite was the Chief Financial Officer of Corel Corporation from 1988 to 1993. Mr. Slaunwhite holds a B.A. Commerce (Honours) from Carleton University.
Katharine B. Stevenson
Ms. Stevenson has served as a director of OpenText since December of 2008. She is a corporate director who has served on a variety of public companyand Not-for-Profit boards in Canada and the United States. Ms. Stevenson is director of the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC). She where she chairs its Corporate Governance Committee and is a member of its Management Resources and Compensation Committee. Ms. Stevenson is also a director of CAE Inc., where she is Chairman of the Audit Committee. and Capital Power Corporation (Audit Committee Chair). CIBC, and CAE Inc., and Capital Power Corporation are all publicly listed companies. She also serves on the St. Michael's Hospital Foundation Board. She was formerly a senior finance executive of Nortel Networks Corporation from 1995 to 2007, serving as global treasurer.2007. Previously, she held a variety of positions in investment and corporate banking at JP Morgan Chase & Co. Ms. Stevenson holds a B.A. (Magna(Magna Cum Laude)Laude) from Harvard University. She is certified with the professional designation ICD.D. granted by the Institute of Corporate Directors (ICD). Previously,Ms. Stevenson was named one of the 2018 Top 100 Most Powerful Women in Canada. In the last five years, Ms. Stevenson also served as a director of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International Inc., currently Bausch Health Companies Inc., and OSI Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Carl Jürgen Tinggren
Mr. Tinggren has served as a director of OpenText since February 2017. Mr. Tinggren is the former Chief Executive Officer of Schindler Group, a European based global industrial corporation, and has over 30 years of international business experience. Previous to Schindler Group, Mr. Tinggren gained extensive management experience at Sika AG, a public specialty chemicals company, based out of Switzerland, Sweden and North America, as well as at Booz Allen & Hamilton. Mr. Tinggren is currently the Chairman of the board of Bekaert SA and a member of the board of directors of Johnson Controls International, where he also serves as lead director and as chair of the audit committee. Previously, Mr. Tinggren also served as a director of Schindler Group, the Conference Board and Sika AG. Mr. Tinggren received an M.B.A. from Stockholm School of Economics and New York University Business School.
Deborah Weinstein
Ms. Weinstein has served as a director of OpenText since December 2009. Ms. Weinstein is a co-founder and partner of LaBarge Weinstein LLP, a business law firm based in Ottawa, Ontario, since 1997. Ms. Weinstein's legal practice specializes in corporate finance, securities law, mergers and acquisitions and business law representation of public and private companies, primarily in knowledge-based growth industries. Prior to founding LaBarge Weinstein LLP, Ms. Weinstein was a partner of the law firm Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP, where she practiced from 1990 to 1997 in Ottawa, and in Toronto from 1985 to 1987.

Ms. Weinstein also serves as a director of Dynex Power Inc., a manufacturer of power semiconductors, and on a number of not-for-profit boards. Ms. Weinstein holds an LL.B. from Osgoode Hall Law School of York University. In the last five years, Ms. Weinstein also served as a director of LW Capital Pool Inc. and Standard Innovation Corporation, a private company.
Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings
Ms. Stevenson served as a director of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. (Valeant), currently Bausch Health Companies Inc., from 2010 until her voluntary resignation in March 2016. During her tenure, Valeant was, and continues to be, the Treasurersubject of Nortel Networks Corporation (Nortel) from 2000 to August 2007. Mr. Doolittle served as the Chief Financial Officer of Nortel from 2009 to 2012. Mr. Davies served as the Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary of Nortel during 2007 and from January to September 2009. In January 2009, Nortel filed petitions under applicable bankruptcy and insolvency laws of the United States,certain putative securities class action claims in Canada and the United Kingdom.States. These claims allege, among other things, misrepresentations by Valeant in certain of its public disclosure documents.
Mr. Fowlie was a director of Meikle Group Inc. (Meikle Group), a private company, from June 2009 to April 2010. Subsequent to Mr. Fowlie's resignation, as part of a restructuring, creditors appointed a receiver to sell the business assets and transfer employees of Meikle Group, as a going concern, to a newly financed company.
Mr. Sadler was a director of Frontline Technologies Inc. (formerly Belzberg Technologies Inc.) from October 1997 to April 2012. Subsequent to Mr. Sadler's resignation, Frontline Technologies Inc. filed an assignment into bankruptcy under applicable bankruptcy and insolvency laws of Canada.

Audit Committee
The Audit Committee currently consists of threefour directors, Mr. Fowlie (Chair), Mr. Tinggren, Mr. Singh and Mses. Hamilton andMs. Stevenson, all of whom have been determined by the Board of Directors to be independent as that term is defined in NASDAQ Rule 5605(a)(2) and in Rule 10A-3 promulgated by the SEC under the Exchange Act, and within the meaning of our director independence standards and those of any exchange, quotation system or market upon which our securities are traded.
The responsibilities, mandate and operation of the Audit Committee are set out in the Audit Committee Charter, a copy of which is available on the Company's website, investors.opentext.com under the Corporate Governance section.
The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Fowlie qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as such term is defined in SEC Regulation S-K, Item 407(d)(5)(ii).
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
We have a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the Ethics Code) that applies to all of our directors, officers and employees. The Ethics Code incorporates our guidelines designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships, and compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. The Ethics Code also incorporates our expectations of our employees that enable us to provide full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in our filings with the SEC and other public communications.
The full text of the Ethics Code is published on our web site at investors.opentext.com under the Corporate Governance section.
If we make any substantive amendments to the Ethics Code or grant any waiver, including any implicit waiver, from a provision of the Ethics Code to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or Chief Accounting Officer, we will disclose the nature of the amendment or waiver on our website at investors.opentext.com or on a Current Report on Form 8-K.
Board Diversity and Term Limits 
The Company, including the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, views diversity in a broad context and considers a variety of factors when assessing nominees for the Board. The Company has established a Board Diversity Policy recognizing that a Board made up of highly qualified directors from diverse backgrounds, including diversity of gender, age, race, sexual orientation, religion, ethnicity and geographic representation, is important. The Company has not established a specific target number or date by which to achieve a specific number of women on the Board, as we consider a multitude of factors, including skills, experience, expertise and character, in determining the best nominee at the time and consider the Company’s objectives and challenges at such time. There are currently three women on the Board which represents approximately 33%27% of the current Board and of the director nominees, and 50%33% of the current independent Board members.
The Company has not set term limits for independent directors because it values the cumulative experience and comprehensive knowledge of the Company that long serving directors possess. The Company does not have a director retirement policy, however the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considers the results of its director assessment process in determining the nominees to be put forward. In conducting director evaluations and nominations, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considers the composition of the Board and whether there is a need to

include nominees with different skills, experiences and perspectives on the Board. This flexible approach allows the Company to consider each director individually as well as the Board composition generally to determine if the appropriate balance is being achieved.
Diversity in Executive Officer Positions
The Company is committed to a diverse and inclusive workplace, including advancing women to executive officer positions. The Company has not adopted specific objectives or targets regarding women at the executive officer level; however, the Company has adopted a formal written Global Diversity and Inclusion Policy which expresses its commitment to fostering a diverse and inclusive workplace for all employees. The Company currently only has one woman (8%two women (17%) on the executive leadership team (ELT), our Senior Vice President, Human Resources, while 20%approximately 21% of existing positions on the senior leadership team (SLT), exclusive of our ELT, are held by women. A principal objective of our Global Diversity and Inclusion Policy is to support and monitor the identification, development and retention of diverse employees, including gender diversity at executive and leadership positions. We will continue to develop a sustainable culture of diversity and inclusion that provides all employees an opportunity to excel.


Item 11.    Executive Compensation
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
Our Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with our management the following Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A). Based on this review and discussion, our Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors (Board) that the following CD&A be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2016.Fiscal 2019.
This report is provided by the following independent directors, who comprise our Compensation Committee:
Michael Slaunwhite (Chair), Brian J. Jackman,Gail E. Hamilton, Deborah Weinstein.
To the extent that this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been or will be specifically incorporated by reference into any filing by us under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), this “Compensation Committee Report” shall not be deemed “soliciting materials”, unless specifically otherwise provided in any such filing.
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The following discussion and analysis of compensation arrangements of the following individuals for the fiscal year which ended on June 30, 20162019 (Fiscal 2016)2019), should be read together with the compensation tables and related disclosures set forth below: (i) our principal executive officer, (ii) our principal financial officer, and (iii) our three most highly compensated executive officers, other than our principal executive officer and principal financial officer (collectively, the Named Executive Officers). This discussion contains forward-looking statements that are based on our current plans, considerations, expectations and projections regarding future compensation programs. Actual compensation programs that we adopt in the future may differ materially from the various planned programs summarized in this discussion.
Payments in Canadian dollars included herein, unless otherwise specified, are converted to U.S. dollars using an average annual exchange rate of 0.755310.0.756489.
Overview of Compensation Program
TheDetermining the compensation of our Named Executive Officers is the responsibility of the Compensation Committee of OpenText's board of directors (the Compensation Committee or the Committee), either alone or in certain circumstances, in consultation with the Board. The Compensation Committee ensures compensation decisions are in line with our goal to provide total compensation to our Named Executive Officers that (i) is fair, reasonable and consistent with our compensation philosophy to achieve our short-term and long-term business goals, and (ii) provides market competitive compensation. The Named Executive Officers who are the subject of this CD&A are:
Mark J. Barrenechea - Vice Chair, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Technology Officer (CEO)
John M. DoolittleMadhu Ranganathan - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (CFO)
Steve Murphy - President
Gordon A. Davies - Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Development
Muhi Majzoub - Executive Vice President, Engineering

Muhi Majzoub - Executive Vice President, Engineering
Gordon A. Davies - Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Development
Simon Harrison - Executive Vice President, Worldwide Sales
Compensation Oversight Process
Role of Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee has responsibility for the oversight of executive compensation within the terms and conditions of our various compensation plans. The Compensation Committee approves the compensation of our executive officers, including all Named Executive Officers with the exception of our CEO.In making compensation decisions relating to, among other things, performance targets, base salary, bonuses, executive benefits, short-term incentives and long-term incentives, the Compensation Committee considers the input of the CEO. With respect to the compensation of our CEO, the Compensation Committee makes recommendations to the Board (excluding the CEO) for approval. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves all equity awards related to executive compensation which are grantedprior to final approval and granting by the Board.
The Board, the Compensation Committee, and our management have instituted a set of detailed policies and procedures to evaluate the performance of each of our Named Executive Officers which help determine the amount of the short-term incentives and long-term incentives to award to each Named Executive Officer.

The Compensation Committee considers previous compensation awards, competitive market practice, the impact of tax, accounting treatments and applicable regulatory requirements when approving compensation programs.
During Fiscal 2016,2019, the Committee’s work included the following:
Executive Compensation Review
Executive Compensation Review - The Compensation Committee continually reviews compensation practices and policies with respect to our senior management team against similar-sized global technology companies, in order to allow us to place our compensation practices for these positions in a market context. This benchmarking may include a review of base salary, short-term incentives and long-term incentives.
Long-Term Incentive Plan - The Compensation Committee reviewed semi-annual analysis provided by Mercer Canada Limited (Mercer) related to performance under all outstanding Performance Share Unit Programs (for details on the programs, refer to the section titled “Long Term Incentives”).
Although the Compensation Committee continually reviewshas responsibility for decisions on executive compensation, practices and policies with respect to our senior management team against similar-sized global technology companies, in order to allow us to place our compensation practices for these positions in a market context. This benchmarking may include a review of base salary, total cash compensation and total direct compensation.
Long-Term Incentive Plan - The Compensation Committee reviewed quarterly analysis provided by Mercer Canada Limited (Mercer) related to performance under all outstanding Performance Share Unit Programs (for details on the programs, refer to the section titled “Long Term Incentives”).
In reaching its decisions, the Compensation Committeeit may consider input from management, analysis provided from the compensation consultant, as well as other factors that the Committee considers appropriate. Decisions made by
Compensation Consultant
NASDAQ standards require compensation committees to have certain responsibilities and authority regarding the retention, oversight and funding of committees' advisors and perform an evaluation of each advisor's independence, taking into consideration all factors relevant to that person's independence from management. NASDAQ standards also require that such rights and responsibilities be enumerated in the compensation committee's charter. While, as a foreign private issuer under the U.S. federal securities laws, we are exempt from these rules, nonetheless, our Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate outside consultants. From time to time, the Compensation Committee areseeks the responsibilityadvice of an outside compensation consultant to provide assistance and guidance on compensation issues. The compensation consultant may provide the Compensation Committee with relevant information pertaining to market compensation levels, alternative compensation plan designs, market trends and best practices and may assist the Compensation Committee with respect to determining the appropriate benchmarks for each Named Executive Officer's compensation.
In Fiscal 2019, the Compensation Committee retained Hugessen Consulting Inc. (Hugessen), an independent consulting firm specializing in executive compensation consulting. During Fiscal 2019 representatives of Hugessen were consulted from time to time by members of the Compensation Committee. Hugessen reviewed relevant information and industry benchmarks and independently advised members of the Compensation Committee on matters relating to CEO and may reflect factors and considerationsexecutive officer compensation. Hugessen did not provide any other thanservices to the information and/or recommendations provided by management and theCompany during Fiscal 2019, outside of its capacity as compensation consultants.
The Compensation Committee met fourfive times during Fiscal 2016.2019. Management assisted in the coordination and preparation of the meeting agenda and materials for each meeting. The agenda is reviewed and approved by the Chairman of the Compensation Committee. The meeting materials are generally posted and made available to the other Committee members and invitees, if any, for review approximately one week in advance of each meeting.
Compensation Consultant
From time to time, the Compensation Committee may seek the advice of an outside compensation consultant to provide assistancePhilosophy and guidance on compensation issues. This consultant has been screened and chosen by the Compensation Committee in discussion with management. The consultant may provide the Compensation Committee with relevant information pertaining to market compensation levels, alternative compensation plan designs, market trends and best practices and assists the Compensation Committee with respect to determining the appropriate benchmarks for each Named Executive Officer's compensation. In Fiscal 2016, the Compensation Committee retained Hugessen Consulting Inc. (Hugessen), an independent consulting firm specializing in executive compensation consulting. Hugessen was not engaged to provide any other services to the Company outside of its capacity as compensation consultants.
NASDAQ standards require compensation committees to have certain responsibilities and authority regarding the retention, oversight and funding of such committees' advisors and perform an evaluation of each advisor's independence, taking into consideration all factors relevant to that person's independence from management. NASDAQ standards also require that such rights and responsibilities be enumerated in the compensation committee's charter. While, as a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from these rules, nonetheless, our Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate outside consultants.


Compensation PhilosophyObjectives
We believe that compensation plays an important role in achieving short and long-term business objectives that ultimately drives business success in alignment with long-term shareholder goals.
Our compensation philosophy is based on three fundamental principles:value creation.
Strong link to business strategy - Our short and long-term goals are reflected in our overall compensation program.
Our compensation philosophy is based on three fundamental principles:The objectives of our compensation program are to:
l
Strong link to business strategy - Our short and long-term goals are reflected in our overall compensation program.
l
Attract and retain highly qualified executive officers who have a history of proven success
Pay for Performance - We aim to reward sustained company performance and individual achievements by aligning a significant portion of total compensation to our financial results and strategic objectives. We believe compensation should fluctuate with financial performance and accordingly, we structure total compensation to be at or above our peer group median when our financial performance exceeds our target performance and likewise, we structure total compensation to be below our peer group median if our financial performance falls below our targets; and
Market relevant - Our compensation program provides market competitive pay in terms of value and structure in order to retain talent who are performing according to their objectives and to attract new talent of the highest caliber. We aim to position our executive officers’ compensation targets at the median in relation to our peer group, however, actual pay depends on performance of the executive officers and the Company.
l
Pay for performance - We aim to reward sustained company performance by aligning a significant portion of total compensation to our financial results and strategic objectives. We believe compensation should fluctuate with financial performance and accordingly, we structure total compensation to be at or above our peer group median when our financial performance exceeds our target performance and likewise, we structure total compensation to be below our peer group median if our financial performance falls below our targets.
l
Align the interests of executive officers with our shareholders' interests and with the execution of our business strategy by evaluatingexecutive performance on the basis of key financial metrics which we believe closely correlate to long-term shareholder value
l
Motivate and reward our high caliber executive team through competitive pay practices and an appropriate mix of short and long-term incentives
l
Market relevant - Our compensation program provides market competitive pay in terms of value and structure in order to retain talent who are performing according to their objectives and to attract new talent of the highest caliber. We aim to position our executive officers’ compensation targets at the median in relation to our peer group, however, actual pay depends on performance of the executive officers and the Company.

l
Tie compensation awards directly to key financial metrics with evaluations based on achieving and overachieving predetermined objectives
Our reward package is based primarily on results achieved by the Company as a whole. In addition, our Named Executive Officers may have a minority element of their reward package determined by their fulfillment of objectives which are specific to their role (Personal Objectives). The Compensation Committee has the flexibility to exercise discretion to ensure total compensation appropriately reflects performance.
The Compensation Objectives
The objectives of our compensation program are to:
Attract and retain highly qualified executive officers who have a history of proven success;
Align the interests of executive officers with our shareholders' interests and with the execution of our business strategy;
Motivate and reward our high caliber executive team through competitive pay practices and an appropriate mix of short and long-term incentives;
Evaluate executive performance on the basis of key financial measurements which we believe closely correlate to long-term shareholder value; and
Tie compensation awards directly to key financial measurements with evaluations based on achieving and overachieving predetermined objectives.Committee rarely exercises said discretion.
Competitive Compensation
Aggregate compensation for each Named Executive Officer is designed to be market competitive. The Compensation Committee researches and refers to the compensation practices of similarly situated companies in determining our compensation policy. Although the Compensation Committee reviews each element of compensation for market competitiveness, and may weigh a particular element more heavily than another based on our Named Executive Officer's role within the Company, the focus remains on being competitive in the market with respect to total compensation remains.compensation.
The Compensation Committee regularlyperiodically reviews data related to compensation levels and programs of a peer group of comparable organizations. In January 2014, aOur last peer group analysis was prepared for management by Radford, an AON Hewitt Company (Radford), in July 2018 using the criteria described in the table below, by Radford, an AON Hewitt Company (Radford) for management, whichand was presented to and approved by the Compensation Committee.Committee at that time. Our peer group consists of 1816 companies that include 1715 US-based companies and one UK basedIsrael-based company. There were no Canadian organizations that fell within all of the criteria noted below. No additional comparable companies were added to our peer group in Fiscal 2016.

2019.
General DescriptionCriteria ConsideredPeer Group List
Global software and service providers that are similar in size, business complexity, and scope of operations to us.Key metrics considered include revenue, market capitalization, number of employees, and net income.



Generally, organizations within our peer group are in a similar softwaresoftware/technology industry with similar revenues, market capitalizationsize and number of employees that fall between one-third and three times that of our market capitalization.employees.
AOL
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
Autodesk, Inc.

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
CA Technologies
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Citrix Systems, Inc.
DST Systems Inc.
Equinix Inc.

Global Payments Inc.
Informatica Corporation
Mentor Graphics Corporation
Micros Systems Inc.

Nuance Communications, Inc.
PTC
Pitney Bowes
Inc.
Red Hat, Inc.
Sage Group
Synopsis
Sabre Corporation
Symantec Corporation
Synopsys,
Inc.

Teradata Corporation
TIBCO Software Inc.
The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation
No adjustmentsTaking into account the benchmarking review performed in July 2018, further efforts were made to compensation foralign our Named Executive OfficersOfficers' compensation packages more closely with our stated compensation objectives. Accordingly, Messrs. Majzoub and Davies received an adjustment to their respective total cash compensation and Mr. Harrison received an adjustment to his short-term incentive compensation during Fiscal 2016. However, the peer group analysis was taken into consideration when offering employment to Mr. Murphy, who joined the Company during Fiscal 2016. Also see “Long-Term Incentives - Other Long-Term Equity Grants” below.2019.

Aligning Officers' Interests with Shareholders' Interests
We believe that transparent, objective and easily verifiedverifiable corporate goals, combined with relevant and measurable individual performance goals play an important role in creating and maintaining an effective compensation strategy for our Named Executive Officers. Our objective is to facilitate an increase in shareholder value, over the longer term, through the achievement of these corporate goals under the leadership of our Named Executive Officers working in conjunction with all of our valued employees.
We use a combination of fixed and variable compensation to motivate our executive officers to achieve our corporate goals. For Fiscal 2016,2019, the basic components of our executive officer compensation program were:
Fixed pay;
Short-term incentives; and
Long-term incentives.
To ensure alignment of the interests of our executive officers with the interests of our shareholders, our executive officers have a significant proportion of compensation “at risk”. Compensation that is “at risk” means compensation that may or may not be paid to an executive officer depending on whether the Company and such executive officer is able to meet or exceed applicable performance targets. Short-term incentives and long-term incentives meet this definition of compensation which is at risk, and long-term incentives are an additional incentive used to promote long-termthe creation of longer-term shareholder value. TheIn general, the greater the executive officer’s influence upon our financial or operational results, the higher is the risk/reward"at risk" portion of histhe executive officer's compensation.
The Compensation Committee annually considers the percentage of each Named Executive Officer's total compensation that is “at risk” depending on the Named Executive Officer's responsibilities and objectives.
The chart below provides the approximate percentage of target total compensation provided to each Named Executive Officer that was either fixed pay or “at risk” for Fiscal 2016:2019:
Named Executive Officer
Fixed Pay Percentage
(“Not At Risk”)
Short-Term Incentive
Percentage (at 100% target)
(“At Risk”)
Long-Term Incentive
Percentage (at 100% target)
(“At Risk”)
Fixed Pay Percentage
(“Not At Risk”)
Short-Term Incentive
Percentage (at 100% target)
(“At Risk”)
Long-Term Incentive
Percentage (at 100% target)
(“At Risk”)
Mark J. Barrenechea14%14%72%12%18%70%
John M. Doolittle26%21%53%
Steve Murphy21%21%58%
Madhu Ranganathan25%50%
Muhi Majzoub21%22%57%
Gordon A. Davies21%14%65%21%22%57%
Muhi Majzoub25%17%58%
Simon Harrison32%34%
Fixed Pay
Fixed pay includes:
Base salary;
Perquisites; and
Other benefits.
Base Salary
The base salary review for each Named Executive Officer takes into consideration factors such as current competitive market conditions and particular skills (such as leadership ability and management effectiveness, experience, responsibility and proven or expected performance) of the particular individual. The Compensation Committee obtains information regarding competitive market conditions through the assistance of management and our compensation consultants.
The performance of each of our Named Executive Officers, other than our CEO, is assessed by our CEO in his capacity as the direct supervisor of the other Named Executive Officers. The performance of our CEO is assessed by the Board.Board (excluding the CEO). The Board conducts the initial discussions and makes the initial decisions with respect to the performance of our CEO in a special session from which management is absent.
For details on the determination of base salary and our benchmarking process, see "Competitive Compensation" above.

Perquisites
Our Named Executive Officers receive a minimal amount of non-cash compensation in the form of executive perquisites. In order to remain competitive in the market place, our Named Executive Officers are entitled to some limited benefits that are not otherwise available to all of our employees, including:
An annual executive medical physical examination;
A base allowance to cover expenses such as financial planning, tax preparation or health club memberships.
Other Benefits
We provide various employee benefit programs on the same terms to all employees, including our Named Executive Officers, such as, but not limited to:
Medical health insurance;
Dental insurance;
Life insurance; and
Tax based retirement savings plans matching contributions.
Short-Term Incentives
In Fiscal 2016,2019, all of our Named Executive Officers participated in our short-term incentive plan, which is designed to motivate achievement of our short-term corporate goals. These short-term corporate goals are typically derived from our annual business plan which is prepared by management and approved by the Board. Awards made under the short-term incentive plan are made by way of cash payments only.
The amount of the short-term incentive payable to each Named Executive Officer, in general, is based on the ability of each Named Executive Officer to meet pre-established, qualitative and quantitative corporate objectives related to improving shareholder and company value, as applicable, which are reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee and the Board. For all Named Executive Officers these objectives consist of worldwide revenues and worldwide adjusted operating income. In addition to these targets, all of our Named Executive Officers,income with the exception of Mr. Murphy, have goals which are specificHarrison. Due to their role, which we referhis responsibilities relating to as Personal Objectives. Personal Objectives are measurablesales, Mr. Harrison's objectives consist of worldwide license and relevant to how we operatecloud revenues and growminimum contract value (MCV) and may include matters such as succession planning, corporate development initiatives and specific operational objectives. Mr. Murphy joined the Company halfway through its fiscal year and as a result was not assigned any Personal Objectives for Fiscal 2016. Mr. Murphy is expected to have Personal Objectives set for the Company's next fiscal year.worldwide adjusted operating income.
Worldwide revenues are derived from the “Total Revenues” line of our audited income statement with certain adjustments relating to the aging of accounts receivable. Worldwide revenues are an important variable that helps us to assess our Named Executive Officers’ rolesperformance in helping us to grow and manage our business.

Worldwide license and cloud revenues are derived from sum of the "License" and "Cloud services and subscriptions" lines of our audited income statement.
MCV is the total projected commissionable incremental revenue defined in a signed and written agreement between the Company and its customer. It represents the minimum amount of revenue that we expect to receive from a contract. For the purposes of calculating the achievement of this performance objective, we only consider MCV that is derived from new business.
Worldwide adjusted operating income, which is intended to reflect the operational effectiveness of our leadership, is calculated as total revenues less the total cost of revenues and operating expenses excluding amortization of intangible assets, special charges and stock-based compensation expense. Worldwide adjusted operating income is also adjusted to remove the impact of foreign exchange.


For Fiscal 2016,2019, the following table illustrates the total short-term target awards for each Named Executive Officer, along with the associated weighting of the related performance measures.
Named Executive OfficerTotal Target
Award
Worldwide RevenuesWorldwide Adjusted Operating IncomePersonal Objectives
Mark J. Barrenechea$945,000
45%45%10%
John M. Doolittle$302,124
45%45%10%
Steve Murphy (1)
$300,000
N/A
N/A
N/A
Gordon A. Davies$219,795
45%45%10%
Muhi Majzoub$249,000
45%45%10%
(1) In accordance with the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Murphy was entitled to be paid 100% of his total target award for Fiscal 2016 only, irrespective of the Company’s performance. The total target award illustrated in the table above has been prorated based on Mr. Murphy's date of hire with the Company in January 2016.

Named Executive OfficerTotal Target
Award
Worldwide RevenuesWorldwide Adjusted Operating IncomeWorldwide License and Cloud Revenues and MCV
Mark J. Barrenechea$1,425,000
50%50%N/A
Madhu Ranganathan$500,000
50%50%N/A
Muhi Majzoub$425,000
50%50%N/A
Gordon A. Davies$389,592
50%50%N/A
Simon Harrison$437,500
N/A40%60%
For the short-term incentive award amounts that would be earned at each of threshold, target and maximum levels of performance, for applicable objectives, see “Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal 2016”2019” below.
For each performance measure noted above, the Compensation Committee approves the total target award eligible to be earned by a Named Executive Officer, and the Board applies a threshold and target level of performance. Where applicable, the Board also applies an objective formula for determining the percentage payout under awards for levels of performance above and below threshold and target, although the Board reserves the right in limited circumstances to make positive or negative adjustments if it considers them to be reasonably appropriate.target. To the extent target performance is exceeded, the award will be proportionately greater. The threshold and target levels and payout formula are set forth below as well as actual performance and payout percentages achieved in Fiscal 2016.2019. The Board has discretion to make positive or negative adjustments if it considers them to be reasonably appropriate. The Board did not make any discretionary adjustments for Fiscal 2019 awards.
Objectives (in millions)Threshold Target
(90% target)
TargetFiscal 2016
Actual (1)
% Target Actually Achieved% of Payment per Fiscal 2016 Payout Table
Threshold 
Target
Target
Fiscal 2019
Actual
(1)
% Target Actually Achieved% of Payment per Fiscal 2019 Payout Table
Worldwide Revenues$1,678
$1,864
$1,823
98%85%$2,639
$2,932
$2,898
99%85%
Worldwide Adjusted Operating Income$542
$602
$608
101%110%$873
$970
$1,012
104%200%
Worldwide License and Cloud Revenues and MCV$1,498
$1,664
$1,600
96%70%
(1)Adjusted to remove the impact of foreign exchange and, in some cases, reflect certain adjustments relating to the aging of accounts receivable.



The tables set forthtable below illustrateillustrates the percentage of the target awards that are paid to our Named Executives Officers, with the exception of Mr. Harrison, in accordance with our actual results achieved during Fiscal 2016.2019.
Worldwide Revenues Calculations
% Attainment% Payment% Attainment% Payment
0 - 89%%102%150%
90 - 91%15%103%175%
92 - 93%40%104%200%
94 - 95%55%105%225%
96 - 97%70%106%250%
98 - 99%85%107%275%
100%100%108% and above300% cap
101%125%  
Formula: 
Actual / Budget = % of AttainmentExample: an attainment of 103% results in a payment of 175%
 Worldwide Revenues and Worldwide Adjusted Operating Income - Attainment and Corresponding Payment
 % Attainment% Payment% Attainment% Payment
 0 - 89%—% 100.0%100%
 90 - 91%15% 100.5%125%
 92 - 93%40% 101.0%150%
 94 - 95%55% 101.5%175%
 96 - 97%70% 102% and above200%
 98 - 99%85%   
 Formula:  
 
Actual / Budget = % of Attainment
Linear x25 for every 0.5% over100%
Example: an attainment of 101.0% results in a payment of 150%
 
In Fiscal 2016,2019, we achieved 98%99% of our worldwide revenue target and 104% of our worldwide adjusted operating income target. The “Worldwide Revenues and Worldwide Adjusted Operating Income Calculations” table above illustrates under the “% Attainment” column that an achievement of 98%99% of target for the worldwide revenue performance criteria results in an award payment of 85% of the target award amount.
Worldwide Adjusted Operating Income Calculations
% Attainment% Payment% Attainment% Payment
0 - 89%%108%180%
90 - 91%15%109%190%
92 - 93%40%110%200%
94 - 95%55%111%210%
96 - 97%70%112%220%
98 - 99%85%113%230%
100%100%114%240%
101%110%115%250%
102%120%116%260%
103%130%117%270%
104%140%118%280%
105%150%119%290%
106%160%120% and above300% cap
107%170%  
Formula:   
Actual / Budget = % of AttainmentExample: an attainment of 103% results in a payment of 130%
In Fiscal 2016, we achieved 101% of our worldwide adjusted operating income target. The “Worldwide Adjusted Operating Income Calculations” table above illustrates under the “% Attainment” column thatamount and an achievement of 101%104% of target for the worldwide adjusted operating income performance criterion results in an award payment of 110%200% of the target award amount.

The table below illustrates the percentage of the target awards paid to Mr. Harrison, as a result of more direct responsibilities relating to sales, in accordance with our actual results achieved during Fiscal 2019.
Worldwide License and Cloud Revenues and MCV and Worldwide Adjusted Operating Income -
Attainment and Corresponding Payment
% Attainment% Payment% Attainment% Payment
0 - 89%—% 102%150%
90 - 91%15% 103%175%
92 - 93%40% 104%200%
94 - 95%55% 105%225%
96 - 97%70% 106%250%
98 - 99%85% 107%275%
100%100% 108% and above300% cap
101%125%   
Formula:    
Actual / Budget = % of Attainment
Linear x25 for every 0.5% over100%
 Example: an attainment of 101% results in a payment of 125%
In Fiscal 2019, Mr. Harrison achieved 96% of his worldwide license and cloud revenue and MCV target and 104% of his worldwide adjusted operating income target. The “Worldwide License and Cloud Revenue and MCV and Worldwide Adjusted Operating Income Calculation” table above illustrates under the “% Attainment” column that an achievement of 96% of target for the worldwide license and cloud revenue and MCV performance criteria results in an award payment of 70% of the target award amount and an achievement of 104% of target for the worldwide adjusted operating income performance criterion results in an award payment of 200% of the target award amount.
The actual short-term incentive award earned by each Named Executive Officer for Fiscal 20162019 was determined in accordance with the formulas described above. We have set forth below for each Named Executive Officer the award amount actually paid for Fiscal 2016,2019, and the percentage of target award amount represented by the actual award paid broken out by performance measure as follows:

Mark J. Barrenechea
Performance Measure:
Payable at
Target
Payable at
Threshold
Actual
Payable
($)
Actual
Payable
(% of Target)
Payable at
Target
Payable at
Threshold
Actual
Payable
($)
Actual
Payable
(% of Target)
Worldwide Revenues$425,250
$63,788
$361,463
85%$712,500
$106,875
$605,625
85%
Worldwide Adjusted Operating Income$425,250
$63,788
$467,775
110%$712,500
$106,875
$1,425,000
200%
Personal Objectives$94,500
$14,174
$94,500
100%
Total$945,000
$141,750
$923,738
98%$1,425,000
$213,750
$2,030,625
143%
John M. DoolittleMadhu Ranganathan
Performance Measure:
Payable at
Target
Payable at
Threshold
Actual
Payable
($)
Actual
Payable
(% of Target)
Payable at
Target
Payable at
Threshold
Actual
Payable
($)
Actual
Payable
(% of Target)
Worldwide Revenues$135,956
$20,393
$115,563
85%$250,000
$37,500
$212,500
85%
Worldwide Adjusted Operating Income$135,956
$20,393
$149,551
110%$250,000
$37,500
$500,000
200%
Personal Objectives$30,212
$4,533
$30,212
100%
Total$302,124
$45,319
$295,326
98%$500,000
$75,000
$712,500
143%
Steve MurphyMuhi Majzoub
Performance Measure:
Payable at
Target
Payable at
Threshold
Actual
Payable
($)
Actual
Payable
(% of Target)
Payable at
Target
Payable at
Threshold
Actual
Payable
($)
Actual
Payable
(% of Target)
Worldwide RevenuesN/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
$212,500
$31,875
$180,625
85%
Worldwide Adjusted Operating IncomeN/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
$212,500
$31,875
$425,000
200%
Personal ObjectivesN/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Total$300,000
$300,000
$300,000
100%$425,000
$63,750
$605,625
143%
In accordance with the terms of his employment agreement, and only for Fiscal 2016, Mr. Murphy was entitled to 100% of his Fiscal 2016 target award, which has been prorated based on Mr. Murphy's date of hire with the Company in January 2016.
Gordon A. Davies
Performance Measure:
Payable at
Target
Payable at
Threshold
Actual
Payable
($)
Actual
Payable
(% of Target)
Payable at
Target
Payable at
Threshold
Actual
Payable
($)
Actual
Payable
(% of Target)
Worldwide Revenues$98,908
$14,836
$84,072
85%$194,796
$29,219
$165,577
85%
Worldwide Adjusted Operating Income$98,908
$14,836
$108,799
110%$194,796
$29,219
$389,592
200%
Personal Objectives$21,979
$3,297
$21,979
100%
Total$219,795
$32,969
$214,850
98%$389,592
$58,438
$555,169
143%
Muhi MajzoubSimon Harrison
Performance Measure: 
Payable at
Target
Payable at
Threshold
Actual
Payable
($)
Actual
Payable
(% of Target)
Worldwide License and Cloud Revenues and MCV$262,500
$39,375
$183,750
70%
Worldwide Adjusted Operating Income$175,000
$26,250
$350,000
200%
Total$437,500
$65,625
$533,750
122%
Performance Measure: 
Payable at
Target
Payable at
Threshold
Actual
Payable
($)
Actual
Payable
(% of Target)
Worldwide Revenues$112,050
$16,808
$95,243
85%
Worldwide Adjusted Operating Income$112,050
$16,808
$123,255
110%
Personal Objectives$24,900
$3,734
$24,900
100%
Total$249,000
$37,350
$243,398
98%
Long-Term Incentives
As with many North American technology companies, we have a general practice of granting variable long-term incentives to executive officers.officers, including our Named Executive Officers. Our long-term incentives represent a significant proportion of our executive officers’Named Executive Officers’ total

compensation, and its purpose is two-fold: (i) as a component of a competitive compensation package; and (ii) to align the interests of our executive officersNamed Executive Officers with the interests of our shareholders. Grants are consistent with competitive market practice, and vesting occurs over time, to ensure alignment with our performance over the longer term. Usually a very high percentage of the long-term incentive is "at risk" indicating we will not provide any compensation to the executive unless shareholders have received a positive return.
Long-Term Incentive Plans (LTIP) - General
AWe incentivize our executive officers, including our Named Executive Officers, in part, with long-term compensation pursuant to our LTIP. For each LTIP grant, a target value is established by the Compensation Committee for each Named Executive Officer, except for the CEO, whose target value is established by the Board, based on competitive market practice and by the respective Named Executive Officer’s ability to influence financial or operational performance. Grants are generally made annually and are comprised of the components outlined in the table below.
The target value of the LTIP is split into three components, with 50% represented by Performance Share Units (PSUs), 25% represented by Restricted Share Units (RSUs) and 25% represented by stock options. PSUs and RSUs are based on a rolling three-year program, which means that assessment of a Named Executive Officer's performance under each grant is made continuously over the period, but payments on that grant may only be made at the end of the applicable three year term in either cash or Common Shares, at the discretion of the Board. Options granted under the LTIP generally vest over four years. The LTIP payments may also be subject to certain payment limitations in the event of early termination of employment or change in control of the Company. As well, LTIP payments are subject to mandatory repayment or “clawback” in the event of fraud, willful misconduct or gross negligence by any executive officer, including a Named Executive Officer, affecting the financial performance or financial statements of the Company or the price of our Common Shares. The performance targets and the weightings of performance targets under each LTIP are first recommended by the Compensation Committee and then approved by the Board. Grants are generally made annually and are comprised of the components outlined in the table below. No dividends are paid or accrued on PSUs or RSUs.

Vehicle% of Total LTIPDescriptionVestingPayout
Performance Share Units (PSU)50% of LTIP target award valueThe value of each PSU is equivalent to one Common Share. The number of PSUs granted is determined by converting the dollar value of the target award to PSUs, based on an average share price determined at time of Board grant. The number of PSUs to vest will be based on the Company’s total shareholder return (TSR) at the end of a three year period as compared to the TSR of companies comprising the constituents of the S&P MidCap400 Software and Services Index.Cliff vesting in the third year following the determination by the Board that the performance criteria have been met.Once vested, units will be settled in either Common Shares or cash, at the discretion of the Board. We expect to settle these awards in Common Shares.
Restricted Share Units (RSU)25% of LTIP target award valueThe value of each RSU is equivalent to one Common Share. The number of RSUs granted is determined by converting the dollar value of the target award to RSUs, based on an average share price determined at time of Board grant.Cliff vesting, generally three years after grant date.Once vested, units will be settled in either Common Shares or cash, at the discretion of the Board. We expect to settle these awards in Common Shares.
Stock Options25% of LTIP target award valueThe dollar value of the target award is converted to a number of options using a Black Scholes model. The exercise price is equal to the closing price of our Common Shares on the trading day preceding the date of grant.Vesting is typically 25% on each of the first four anniversaries of grant date. Options expire seven years after the grant date.Once vested, participants may exercise options for Common Shares.
Fiscal 2018Payouts under LTIP grants
For eachmay also be subject to certain limitations in the event of early termination of employment or change in control of the Company; and
are subject to mandatory repayment or “claw-back” in the event of fraud, willful misconduct or gross negligence by any executive officer, including a Named Executive Officer, affecting the compensation targetfinancial performance or financial statements of the Company or the price of our Common Shares.
Fiscal 2021 LTIP
Grants made in Fiscal 2019 under the Fiscal 2021 LTIP took effect on August 6, 2018 LTIP was determined based onwith the Named Executive Officer's overall compensation and by their ability to influence our financial or operational performance.
The target compensation set for each Named Executive Officer undergoal of measuring performance over the Fiscal 2018 LTIP is comprised of three elements: PSUs, RSUs and stock options and represent 50%, 25% and 25%, respectively, of the Named Executive Officer’s

total LTIP target award.year period starting July 1, 2018. The table below illustrates the target value of each element under the Fiscal 20182021 LTIP for each Named Executive Officer.
Named Executive OfficerPerformance Share UnitsRestricted Share UnitsStock OptionsTotalPerformance Share UnitsRestricted Share UnitsStock OptionsTotal
Mark J. Barrenechea$2,565,000
$1,282,500
$1,282,500
$5,130,000
$2,815,000
$1,407,500
$1,407,500
$5,630,000
John M. Doolittle$392,650
$196,325
$196,325
$785,300
Steve Murphy$425,000
$212,500
$212,500
$850,000
Madhu Ranganathan$500,000
$250,000
$250,000
$1,000,000
Muhi Majzoub$550,000
$275,000
$275,000
$1,100,000
Gordon A. Davies$500,000
$250,000
$250,000
$1,000,000
$500,000
$250,000
$250,000
$1,000,000
Muhi Majzoub$425,000
$212,500
$212,500
$850,000
Simon Harrison$218,750
$109,375
$109,375
$437,500
Awards granted in Fiscal 2016,2019 under the Fiscal 20182021 LTIP were in addition to the awards granted in Fiscal 20142018, Fiscal 2017, and Fiscal 2015.prior years. For details of our previous LTIPs, see Item 11 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the appropriate year.
Fiscal 20182021 LTIP - PSUs
With respect to our PSUs, we use relative TSR to benchmark the Company’s performance against the performance of the corporations comprising the constituents of the S&P Mid Cap 400 Software & Services Index (the Index). The Index is comprised of 400 U.S. public companies with unadjusted market capitalization of $1.2$1.8 billion to $5.1$13.6 billion and is a useful

measure of the performance of mid-sized companies. Relative TSR is the sole measure for each Named Executive Officer's performance over the relevant three year period for the Fiscal 20182021 LTIP with respect to PSUs. If over the three year period, the relative cumulative TSR of the Company compared to the cumulative TSR of the Indexis greater than the 66th percentile, the relative TSR target will be achieved in full. If it is negative at the end of the three year period, no payout will be made. Otherwise, any
If the Company's relative cumulative TSR, compared to the cumulative TSR of the Index is:Then the percentage of the PSU target award that will be paid out will be:
Negative—%
1st percentile1.5%
66th percentile100%
100th percentile150%
Any target percentile achieved between 1%1 and 100%100th percentile will be interpolated to determine a payout that can range from 1.5% to 150% of the target award based on the number of PSUs that were granted in connection with the Fiscal 2018 LTIP.award.
The amounts that may be realized for PSU awards under the Fiscal 20182021 LTIPare as follows, calculated based on the market price of our Common Shares on the NASDAQ as of June 30, 2016,2019, and applied to the number of PSUs to be issued to the Named Executive Officers based on target level achievement.the levels of achievement disclosed above.
Fiscal 2018 LTIP PSUs
Fiscal 2021 LTIP PSUsFiscal 2021 LTIP PSUs
Named Executive Officer1.5% Achievement at June 30, 2018
100% Achievement
at June 30, 2018
150% Achievement
at June 30, 2018
1.5% Payout
at June 30, 2021
100% Payout
at June 30, 2021
150% Payout 
at June 30, 2021
Mark J. Barrenechea$58,409
$3,893,911
$5,840,867
$46,128
$3,075,168
$4,612,752
John M. Doolittle$8,945
$596,333
$894,500
Steve Murphy$8,333
$555,512
$833,268
Madhu Ranganathan$8,195
$546,312
$819,468
Muhi Majzoub$9,010
$600,696
$901,044
Gordon A. Davies$11,385
$759,023
$1,138,535
$8,195
$546,312
$819,468
Muhi Majzoub$9,682
$645,436
$968,154
Simon Harrison$3,584
$238,960
$358,440
Fiscal 20182021 LTIP - RSUs
RSUs vest over three years and do not have any specific performance-based vesting criteria. Provided the eligible employee remains employed throughout the vesting period, all RSUs granted shall become vested RSUs at the end of the Fiscal 20182021 LTIP period.
The amounts that may be realized for RSU awards under the Fiscal 20182021 LTIPare as follows, calculated based on the market price of our Common Shares on the NASDAQ as of June 30, 2016,2019, and applied to the number of equivalent RSUs to be issued to the Named Executive Officers.
Fiscal 2018 LTIP RSUs 
Fiscal 2021 LTIP RSUsFiscal 2021 LTIP RSUs
Named Executive OfficerValue at June 30, 2016Value upon Payout at June 30, 2021
Mark J. Barrenechea$1,946,956
$1,537,584
John M. Doolittle$298,166
Steve Murphy$277,460
Madhu Ranganathan$273,156
Muhi Majzoub$300,348
Gordon A. Davies$379,807
$273,156
Muhi Majzoub$322,422
Simon Harrison$119,480
Fiscal 20182021 LTIP - Stock Options
The stock options granted in connection with the Fiscal 20182021 LTIP vest over four years, do not have any specific performance-based vesting criteria and, if not exercised, expire after seven years. Our Named Executive Officers will only realize value on these stock options with future OpenText share price appreciation from the date of grant. For a discussion of the assumptions used in the valuation of stock options, see note 12 “Share Capital, Option Plans and Share-based Payments” to our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Other Long-Term Equity Grants
In addition to grants made in connection with theour LTIP program, from time to time, we may grant stock options and/or RSUs to new strategic hires and to our employees in recognition of their service, such as for promotions.promotions, retention, or other reasons. In Fiscal 2016,2019, we granted stock options and RSUs to onetwo of our Named Executive Officers, namely, Mr. Murphy,Majzoub and Mr.

Davies in connection with the commencementrecognition of his employment with us.their service. Details of these grants are contained in the table below under “Grants"Grants of Plan Based Awards Fiscal 2016”Awards". Our RSUs and stock options vest over a specified contract date, typically over three and four years, respectively, and do not have any specific performance criteria. With respect to stock option grants, the Board will determine the following, based upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee: the executive officers entitled to participate in our stock option plan, the number of options to be granted, and any other material terms and conditions of the stock option grant.
All stock option grants, whether part of the LTIP or granted separately for new hires, and promotions, of existing employees,retention or other reasons, are governed by our stock option plans. In addition, grants and exercises of stock options are subject to our Insider Trading Policy. For details of our Insider Trading Policy, see “Other Information With Respect to Our Compensation Program - Insider Trading Policy” below.
For details on the determination of targeted awards and our benchmarking process, see "Compensation Objective - Competitive Compensation" above.
Executive Change in Control and Severance Benefits
Our severance benefit agreements are designed to provide reasonable compensation to departing senior executive officers under certain circumstances. While we do not believe that the severance benefits would be a determinative factor in a senior executive's decision to join or remain with the Company, the absence of such benefits, we believe, would present a distinct competitive disadvantage in the market for talented executive officers. Furthermore, we believe that it is important to set forth the benefits payable in triggering circumstances in advance in an attempt to avoid future disputes or litigation.
The severance benefits we offer to our senior executive officers are competitive with similarly situated individuals and companies. We have structured our senior executive officers' change in control benefits as “double trigger” benefits, meaning that the benefits are only paid in the event of, first, a change in control transaction, and second, the loss of employment within one year after the transaction. These benefits attempt to provide an incentive to our senior executive officers to remain employed with the Company in the event of such a transaction.
Other Information With Respect to Our Compensation Program
Pension Plans
We do not provide pension benefits or any non-qualified deferred compensation to any of our Named Executive Officers.
Share Ownership Guidelines
We currently have equity ownership guidelines (Share Ownership Guidelines), the objective of which is to encourage our senior management, including our Named Executive Officers, and our directors to buy and hold Common Shares in the Company based upon an investment target. We believe that the Share Ownership Guidelines help align the financial interests of our senior management team and directors with the financial interests of our shareholders.
The equity ownership levels are as follows:
CEO4x base salary
Other senior management1x base salary
Non-management director3x annual retainer


For purposes of the Share Ownership Guidelines, individuals are deemed to hold all securities over which he or she is the registered or beneficial owner thereof under the rules of Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship or otherwise in which such person has or shares:
voting power which includes the power to vote, or to direct the voting of, such security; and/or

investment power which includes the power to dispose, or to direct the disposition of, such security.
Also, Common Shares will be valued at the greater of their book value (i.e., purchase price) or the current market value. On an annual basis, the Compensation Committee reviews the recommended ownership levels under the Share Ownership Guidelines and the compliance by our executive officers and directors with the Share Ownership Guidelines.
The Board implemented the Share Ownership Guidelines in October 2009 and recommends that equity ownership levels be achieved within five years of becoming a member of the executive leadership team, including Named Executive Officers. The Board also recommends that the executive leadership team retain their ownership levels for so long as they remain members of the executive leadership team.

Named Executive Officers
Named Executive Officers may achieve these Share Ownership Guidelines through the exercise of stock option awards, purchases under the OpenText Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP), through open market purchases made in compliance with applicable securities laws or through any equity plan(s) we may adopt from time to time providing for the acquisition of Common Shares. Until the Share Ownership Guidelines are met, it is recommended that a Named Executive Officer retain a portion of any stock option exercise or LTIP award in Common Shares to contribute to the achievement of the Share Ownership Guidelines. Common Shares issuable pursuant to the unexercised options shall not be counted towards meeting the equity ownership target.
As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, Messrs. Barrenechea, Davies, and Majzouball Named Executive Officers comply with the Share Ownership Guidelines for Fiscal 2016. Messrs. Doolittle2019, as they have either met the share ownership guidelines or, in the case of Ms. Ranganathan and Murphy, each of whom has only become subject to these guidelines within the past five years,Mr. Harrison, have five years from becoming subject to these guidelines to achieve the equity ownership guidelines required by histheir position.
Directors
With respect to non-management directors, both Common Shares and deferred stock units (DSUs) are counted towards the achievement of the Share Ownership Guidelines. Effective February 2, 2010, the Board adopted theThe Company currently has a Directors’ Deferred Share Unit Plan (DSU Plan), whereby any non-management director of the Company may elect to defer all or part of his or her retainer and/or fees in the form of common stock equivalents. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, all non-management directors have exceeded the Share Ownership Guidelines applicable to them, which is three times their annual retainer. For further details, see the table below titled “Director Compensation for Fiscal 2016”2019”.
Insider Trading Policy
All of our employees, officers and directors, including our Named Executive Officers, are required to comply with our Insider Trading Policy. Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits the purchase, sale or trade of our securities with the knowledge of material inside information. In addition, our Insider Trading Policy prohibits our employees, officers and directors, including our Named Executive Officers, from, directly or indirectly, short selling any security of the Company or entering into any other arrangement that results in a gain only if the value of the Company's securities decline in the future, selling a “call option” giving the holder an option to purchase securities of the Company, or buying a “put option” giving the holder an option to sell securities of the Company. The definition of “trading in securities” includes any derivatives-based, monetization, non-recourse loan or similar arrangement that changes the insider’s economic exposure to or interest in securities of the Company and which may not necessarily involve a sale.
All grants of stock options are subject to our Insider Trading Policy and as a result, stock options may not be granted during the “blackout” period beginning on the fifteenth day of the last month of each quarter and ending at the beginning of the second trading day following the date on which the Company’s quarterly or annual financial results, as applicable, have been publicly released. If the Board approves the issuance of stock options during the blackout period, these stock options are not granted until the blackout period is over. The price at which stock options are granted is not less than the closing price of the Company’s Common Shares on the trading day for the NASDAQ market immediately preceding the applicable grant date.
Tax Deductibility of Compensation
Under Section 162(m) of the United States Internal Revenue Code (or Section 162(m)) publicly-held corporations cannot deduct compensation paid in excess of $1,000,000 to certain executive officers in any taxable year. CertainThe Tax Cuts and Jobs Act amended Section 162(m) to expand the corporations and executives to which it applies. Beginning in Fiscal 2019, we are no longer able to deduct under Section 162(m) compensation paid under plans that are “performance-based” (which means compensation paid only if the individual's performance meets pre-established objective goals based upon performance criteria approved by shareowners) are not subject to the $1,000,000 annual limit. Although our compensation policy is designed to link compensation to performance, payments in excess of $1,000,000 made pursuant to any person who served as CEO or CFO during the taxable year and any other Named Executive Officer serving as an executive at the end of our compensation plansthe taxable year (each, a “covered employee”) as well any person who was a covered employee in a preceding taxable year, subject to United States-based executives may not be deductible under Section 162(m).limited transition relief.

Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth summary information concerning the annual compensation of our Named Executive Officers. All numbers are rounded to the nearest dollar or whole share. Changes in exchange rates will impact payments illustrated below that are made in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Any Canadian dollar payments included herein have been converted to U.S. dollars at an annual average rate of 0.7553100.756489, 0.862713, 0.786589, and 0.934857,0.754836, for Fiscal 2016,2019, Fiscal 2015,2018, and Fiscal 2014,2017, respectively. Any British pounds sterling payments included herein have been converted to U.S. dollars at an annual average rate of 1.342283 for Fiscal 2018.
 
Fiscal
Year
Salary
($)
Bonus
($)
Stock
Awards
($) (1)
Option
Awards
($) (2)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($) (3)
Change in
Pension Value
and
Non-qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)
All Other
Compensation
($) (4)
Total ($)
Mark J. Barrenechea2016$945,000

$3,658,934
$1,283,437
$923,738
N/A$22,082
(5)$6,833,191
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Technology Officer2015$847,000

$4,578,866
$8,923,671
$1,115,100
N/A$38,352
(6)$15,502,989
 2014$690,247

$1,262,914
$524,181
$869,090
N/A$19,168
(6)$3,365,600
           
John M. Doolittle2016$377,655

$560,347
$196,449
$295,326
N/A$14,424
(7)$1,444,201
EVP, Chief Financial Officer2015$351,294

$1,233,432
$2,379,500
$339,334
N/A$
(8)$4,303,560
 2014N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/AN/A
(9)N/A
           
Steve Murphy (11)2016$297,727

$1,579,641
$1,834,275
$300,000
N/A$
(8)$4,011,643
President2015N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/AN/A
(9)N/A
 2014N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/AN/A
(9)N/A
           
Gordon A. Davies2016$314,209

$713,431
$250,169
$214,850
N/A$15,276
(10)$1,507,935
EVP, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Development2015$358,889

$636,878
$202,466
$296,238
N/A$17,774
(6)$1,512,245
 2014$380,591

$506,247
$125,222
$253,681
N/A$
(8)$1,265,741
           
Muhi Majzoub2016$356,000

$606,276
$212,632
$243,398
N/A$
(8)$1,418,306
EVP, Engineering2015N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/AN/A
(9)N/A
 2014$338,778

$325,320
$81,398
$232,193
N/A$
(8)$977,689
 
Fiscal
Year
Salary
($)
Bonus
($)
Stock
Awards
($) 
(1)
Option
Awards
($)
(2)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
(3)
Change in
Pension Value
and
Non-qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)
All Other
Compensation
($)
(4)
Total ($)
Mark J. Barrenechea2019$950,000

$3,693,934
$1,407,800
$2,030,625
N/A$17,315
(5) 
$8,099,674
Vice Chair, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Technology Officer2018$950,000

$3,538,963
$1,407,556
$1,211,250
N/A$37,161
(6) 
$7,144,930
 2017$945,000

$3,233,360
$5,821,023
$1,925,625
N/A$13,926
(6) 
$11,938,934
           
Madhu Ranganathan2019$500,000

$656,237
$250,019
$712,500
N/A$
 $2,118,756
EVP, Chief Financial Officer2018$125,000

$315,057
$2,275,143
$106,250
N/A$
(6) 
$2,821,450
 2017N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/AN/A
(8) 
N/A
           
Muhi Majzoub2019$412,500

$721,564
$938,260
$605,625
N/A$
(7) 
$2,677,949
Executive Vice President, Engineering2018$400,000

$691,379
$274,993
$340,000
N/A$
(6) 
$1,706,372
 2017$356,000

$535,825
$212,651
$527,313
N/A$
(6) 
$1,631,789
           
Gordon A. Davies2019$371,310

$656,237
$913,258
$555,169
N/A$14,730
(9) 
$2,510,704
Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Development2018$367,077

$628,627
$249,994
$312,015
N/A$15,969
(6) 
$1,573,682
 2017$314,012

$630,050
$250,270
$464,681
N/A$
(6) 
$1,659,013
           
Simon Harrison2019$400,000

$287,042
$109,361
$533,750
N/A$655,329
(10) 
$1,985,482
Executive Vice President, Worldwide Sales2018$388,916

$221,328
$868,563
$288,972
N/A$11,470
(6) 
$1,779,249
 2017N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/AN/A
(8) 
N/A
(1)Performance Share Units (PSUs)PSUs and Restricted Share Units (RSUs)RSUs were granted pursuant to the Fiscal 2018 LTIP and other non- LTIP related grants.2021 LTIP. The amounts set forth in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value, as computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718 “Compensation-Stock Compensation” (Topic 718). Grant date fair value may vary from the target value indicated in the table set forth above in the section “Fiscal 20182021 LTIP”. For a discussion of the assumptions used in these valuations, see note 12 “Share Capital, Option Plans and Share-based Payments” to our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. For the maximum value that may be received under the PSU awards granted in Fiscal 2019 by each Named Executive Officer, see the “Maximum” column under “Estimated Future Payouts under Equity Incentive Plan Awards” under the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2016”2019” table below.
(2)Amounts set forth in this column represent the amount recognized as the aggregate grant date fair value of stock option awards, as calculated in accordance with Topic 718 for the fiscal year in which the awards were granted. In all cases, these amounts do not reflect whether the recipient has actually realized a financial benefit from the exercise of the awards. For a discussion of the assumptions used in this valuation, see note 12 “Share Capital, Option Plans and Share-based Payments” to our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(3)The amounts set forth in this column for Fiscal 20162019 represent payments under the short-term incentive plan.
(4)Except as otherwise indicated the amounts in “All Other Compensation” primarily include (i) car allowance; (ii) medical examinations; (ii) car allowances, (iii) club memberships reimbursed, and (iv) tax preparation and financial advisory fees paid. “All Other Compensation” does not include benefits received by the Named Executive Officers which are generally available to all our salaried employees.

(5)Represents amounts we paid or reimbursed for Tax, Financial,tax, financial, and Estate Planning.estate planning.

(6)For details of the amounts of fees or expenses we paid or reimbursed please refer to Summary Compensation Table in Item 11 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the corresponding fiscal years ended June 30, 20152018 and June 30, 2014.2017.

(7)Represents amounts we paid or reimbursed for:
a.Taxable benefit on annual sales event ($11,192);
b.Medical Examination ($1,960); and
b.Other miscellaneous expenses or benefits that are less than 10% of the total amount of perquisites and personal benefits related to Mr. Doolittle.
(8)The total value of all perquisites and personal benefits for this Named Executive Officer was less than $10,000, and, therefore, excluded.
(9)(8)The executive officer was not a Named Executive Officer during the fiscal year, and, therefore compensation details have been excluded.
(9)Represents amounts we paid or reimbursed for:
a.Club membership fees ($3,505)
b.Taxable benefit on annual sales event ($11,225)
(10)Represents amounts we paid or reimbursed for:
a.Taxable benefit on annual sales event ($12,204); and
b.Club Membership ($3,072)
(11)a.The amounts set forth forTax equalization in respect of taxes incurred in 2015-2017 in connection with Mr. Murphy's salary and non-equity incentive awards represent a prorated amount basedHarrison's transition from the UK to the United States ($549,403).
b.Housing allowance ($101,368)
c.Taxable benefit on Mr. Murphy's date of hire in January 2016 with the Company.annual sales event ($4,558)
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 20162019
The following table sets forth certain information concerning grants of awards made to each Named Executive Officer during Fiscal 2016.2019.
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards (1)
All Other Option
Awards: Number
of Securities
Underlying (2)
Exercise or
Base Price
of Option
Awards
Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Options (3)
 
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards 
(1)
All Other Option
Awards: Number
of Securities
Underlying (2)
Exercise or
Base Price
of Option
Awards
Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Options
 (3)
Name Grant Date
Threshold
($)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)
Options
(#)
($/share)Awards ($)Grant Date
Threshold
($)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)
Options
(#)
($/share)Awards ($)
Mark J. BarrenecheaJuly 31, 2015$141,750
$945,000
$2,646,000
114,200
$45.73
$1,283,437
August 6, 2018$213,750
$1,425,000
$2,850,000
161,040
$39.27
$1,407,800
John M. DoolittleJuly 31, 2015$45,319
$302,124
$845,947
17,480
$45.73
$196,449
Steve Murphy (4)
February 11, 2016N/A
$300,000
N/A
150,000
$47.01
$1,621,530
Madhu RanganathanAugust 6, 2018$75,000
$500,000
$1,000,000
28,600
$39.27
$250,019
Muhi MajzoubAugust 6, 2018$63,750
$425,000
$850,000
31,460
$39.27
$275,021
February 11, 2016 19,680
$47.01
$212,745
May 7, 2019 75,000
$40.20
$663,239
Gordon A. DaviesJuly 31, 2015$32,969
$219,795
$615,427
22,260
$45.73
$250,169
August 6, 2018$58,438
$389,592
$779,184
28,600
$39.27
$250,019
Muhi MajzoubJuly 31, 2015$37,350
$249,000
$697,200
18,920
$45.73
$212,632
May 7, 2019 75,000
$40.20
$663,239
Simon HarrisonAugust 6, 2018$65,625
$437,500
$1,312,500
12,510
$39.27
$109,361

 

Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards (5)
All Other Stock
Awards: Number
of Securities
Underlying (6)
Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock (3) 
 

Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards (4)
All Other Stock
Awards: Number
of Securities
Underlying (5)
Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock
 (3) 
NameGrant Date
Threshold
(#)
Target
(#)
Maximum
(#)
Stock
(#)
Awards ($)Grant Date
Threshold
(#)
Target
(#)
Maximum
(#)
Stock
(#)
Awards ($)
Mark J. BarrenecheaAugust 23, 2015987
65,820
98,730
32,910
 $3,658,934
August 6, 20181,120
74,640
111,960
37,320
 $3,693,934
John M. DoolittleAugust 23, 2015151
10,080
15,120
5,040
 $560,347
Steve MurphyFebruary 11, 2016141
9,390
14,085
4,690
 $674,241
February 11, 2016 20,000
(7)$905,400
Madhu RanganathanAugust 6, 2018199
13,260
19,890
6,630
 $656,237
Muhi MajzoubAugust 6, 2018219
14,580
21,870
7,290
 $721,564
Gordon A. DaviesAugust 23, 2015192
12,830
19,245
6,420
 $713,431
August 6, 2018199
13,260
19,890
6,630
 $656,237
Muhi MajzoubAugust 23, 2015164
10,910
16,365
5,450
 $606,276
Simon HarrisonAugust 6, 201887
5,800
8,700
2,900
 $287,042
(1)Represents the threshold, target and maximum estimated payouts under our short-term incentive plan for Fiscal 2016.2019. For further information, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Aligning Officers' Interests with Shareholders' Interests - Short-Term Incentives” above.
(2)For further information regarding our options granting procedures, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Aligning Officers' Interests with Shareholders' Interests - Long-Term Incentives” above.
(3)Amounts set forth in this column represent the amount recognized as the aggregate grant date fair value of equity-based compensation awards, as calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 718 for the fiscal year in which the awards were granted. In all cases, these amounts do not reflect whether the

recipient has actually realized a financial benefit from the exercise of the awards. For a discussion of the assumptions used in this valuation, see note 12 “Share Capital, Option Plan and Share-based Payments” to our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(4)In accordance with the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Murphy was entitled to 100% of his Fiscal 2016 target award, which has been prorated based on Mr. Murphy's date of hire with the Company in January 2016.
(5)(4)Represents the threshold, target and maximum estimated payouts under our Fiscal 20182021 LTIP PSUs. For further information, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Aligning Officers' Interests with Shareholders' Interests - Long-Term Incentives - Fiscal 20182021 LTIP” above.
(6)(5)Represents the estimated payouts under our Fiscal 20182021 LTIP RSUs and other non-LTIP related RSUs granted in Fiscal 2016.2019. For further information, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Aligning Officers' Interests with Shareholders' Interests - Long-Term Incentives - Fiscal 20182021 LTIP” above.
(7)On February 11, 2016 Mr. Murphy was granted 20,000 RSUs pursuant to his employment agreement. The RSUs vest over two years.

Outstanding Equity Awards at End of Fiscal 20162019
The following table sets forth certain information regarding outstanding equity awards held by each Named Executive Officer as of June 30, 2016.
2019.
 
Option Awards (1) 
  Stock Awards 
Option Awards (1) 
  Stock Awards
NameGrant Date
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable 
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Non-
exercisable
Option
Exercise
Price ($) 
Option Expiration
Date 
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)
(2)
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)
(2)
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
unearned 
shares,
units or other
rights that have
not vested
(#) (3)
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
payout value of unearned 
shares,
units or other
rights that have not vested ($) (3)
Grant Date
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable 
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Non-
exercisable
Option
Exercise
Price ($) 
Option Expiration
Date 
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(2)
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
($) (2)
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
unearned 
shares,
units or other
rights that have
not vested
(#) (3)
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
payout value of unearned 
shares,
units or other
rights that have not vested ($) (3)
Mark J. BarrenecheaFebruary 3, 2012505,123
160,000
$30.18
February 3, 2019    August 1, 2014127,740

$27.83
August 1, 2021    
May 3, 2012100,000

$26.22
May 3, 2019    January 29, 2015300,000
100,000
$27.09
January 29, 2022    
November 2, 201230,246
15,123
$26.37
November 2, 2019    January 29, 2015
800,000
$27.09
January 29, 2022    
August 2, 201333,802
33,802
$33.17
August 2, 2020    July 31, 2015171,300
57,100
$22.87
July 31, 2022    
August 1, 201415,968
47,902
$55.65
August 1, 2021    July 29, 201698,280
98,280
$29.75
July 29, 2023    
January 29, 2015
200,000
$54.17
January 29, 2022    June 1, 2017
600,000
$32.63
June 1, 2024    
January 29, 2015
400,000
$54.17
January 29, 2022    August 7, 201747,295
141,885
$34.49
August 7, 2024    
July 31, 2015
114,200
$45.73
July 31, 2022    August 6, 2018
161,040
$39.27
August 6, 2025    
November 1, 2013   15,058
$890,831
  August 14, 2016   41,600
$1,713,920
  
November 1, 2013     30,116
$1,781,663
August 14, 2016     83,200
$3,427,840
September 4, 2014   18,320
$1,083,811
  August 7, 2017   41,730
$1,719,276
  
September 4, 2014     36,650
$2,168,214
August 7, 2017     83,470
$3,438,964
January 29, 2015   30,000
$1,774,800
  August 6, 2018   37,320
$1,537,584
  
August 23, 2015   32,910
$1,946,956
  August 6, 2018     74,640
$3,075,168
August 23, 2015     65,820
$3,893,911
        
Madhu RanganathanMay 11, 201873,378
220,132
$34.71
May 11, 2025    
        August 6, 2018
28,600
$39.27
August 6, 2025    
John M. DoolittleSeptember 8, 201437,500
112,500
$57.29
September 8, 2021    
May 11, 2018   3,980
$163,976
  
May 11, 2018     7,960
$327,952
August 6, 2018   6,630
$273,156
  
August 6, 2018     13,260
$546,312
        
Muhi MajzoubNovember 2, 201218,788

$13.19
November 2, 2019    
September 8, 20143,458
10,372
$57.29
September 8, 2021    August 2, 201320,996

$16.58
August 2, 2020    
July 31, 2015
17,480
$45.73
July 31, 2022    August 1, 201423,140

$27.83
August 1, 2021    
September 8, 2014   8,333
$492,980
  July 31, 201528,380
9,460
$22.87
July 31, 2022    
September 8, 2014   3,530
$208,835
  July 29, 201616,280
16,280
$29.75
July 29, 2023    
September 8, 2014     7,050
$417,078
August 7, 20179,240
27,720
$34.49
August 7, 2024    
August 23, 2015   5,040
$298,166
  August 6, 2018
31,460
$39.27
August 6, 2025    
August 23, 2015     10,080
$596,333
May 7, 2019
75,000
$40.20
May 7, 2026    
        August 14, 2016   6,900
$284,280
  
Steve MurphyFebruary 11, 2016
150,000
$47.01
February 11, 2023    
February 11, 2016
19,680
$47.01
February 11, 2023    August 14, 2016     13,780
$567,736
February 11, 2016   4,690
$277,460
  August 7, 2017   8,150
$335,780
  
August 7, 2017     16,310
$671,972
August 6, 2018   7,290
$300,348
  
August 6, 2018     14,580
$600,696
        
Gordon A. DaviesAugust 1, 20147,154

$27.83
August 1, 2021    
July 31, 201511,130
11,130
$22.87
July 31, 2022    
July 29, 20169,580
19,160
$29.75
July 29, 2023    
August 7, 20178,400
25,200
$34.49
August 7, 2024    
August 6, 2018
28,600
$39.27
August 6, 2025    

 February 11, 2016      9,390
$555.512
 February 11, 2016    20,000
$1,183,200
  
          
Gordon A. DaviesNovember 2, 20127,226
3,612
$26.37
November 2, 2019    
 August 2, 20134,038
8,074
$33.17
August 2, 2020    
 August 1, 20143,578
10,732
$55.65
August 1, 2021    
 July 31, 2015
22,260
$45.73
July 31, 2022    
 November 1, 2013    3,598
$212,858
  
 November 1, 2013      7,194
$425,597
 September 4, 2014    4,110
$243,148
  
 September 4, 2014      8,210
$485,704
 August 23, 2015    6,420
$379,807
  
 August 23, 2015      12,830
$759,023
          
Muhi MajzoubJune 11, 201270,000

$23.35
June 11, 2019    
 November 2, 20127,046
2,348
$26.37
November 2, 2019    
 August 2, 20135,250
5,248
$33.17
August 2, 2020    
 August 1, 20142,893
8,677
$55.65
August 1, 2021    
 July 31, 2015
18,920
$45.73
July 31, 2022    
 November 1, 2013    2,338
$138,316
  
 November 1, 2013      4,676
$276,632
 September 4, 2014    3,320
$196,411
  
 September 4, 2014      6,640
$392,822
 August 23, 2015    5,450
$322,422
  
 August 23, 2015      10,910
$645,436
 May 7, 2019
75,000
$40.20
May 7, 2026    
 August 14, 2016    8,100
$333,720
  
 August 14, 2016      16,220
$668,264
 August 7, 2017    7,410
$305,292
  
 August 7, 2017      14,830
$610,996
 August 6, 2018    6,630
$273,156
  
 August 6, 2018      13,260
$546,312
          
Simon HarrisonAugust 2, 20137,266

$16.58
August 2, 2020    
 August 7, 20172,960
8,880
$34.49
August 7, 2024    
 November 6, 201720,000
80,000
$34.48
November 6, 2024    
 August 6, 2018
12,510
$39.27
August 6, 2025    
 August 14, 2016    5,680
$234,016
  
 August 7, 2017    2,610
$107,532
  
 August 7, 2017      5,220
$215,064
 August 6, 2018    2,900
$119,480
  
 August 6, 2018      5,800
$238,960
(1)Options in the table above vest annually over a period of 4 years starting from the date of grant, with the exception of (i) 1,200,000 options granted to the CEO in Fiscal 2015 and 600,000 options granted to the CEO in Fiscal 2015.2017. For additional detail, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Aligning Officers' Interests with Shareholders' Interests - Long-Term Incentives - Long-Term Equity Grants to CEO” above and under Item 11 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for Fiscal 2015.2015 and Fiscal 2017 and (ii) options granted to certain of our executive officers on May 7, 2019 in recognition of their service. These options vest annually over a 5 year period, with the first vesting date being two years from the date of grant.
(2)Represents each Named Executive Officer's target number of RSUs granted pursuant to the Fiscal 2016,2019, Fiscal 2017,2020, and Fiscal 20182021 LTIPs, and other RSU grants, which vest upon the schedules described above in "Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Aligning Officers' Interests with Shareholders' Interests - Long Term Incentives". These amounts illustrate the market value as of June 30, 20162019 based upon the closing price for the Company's Common Shares as traded on the NASDAQ on such date of $59.16.$41.20.
(3)Represents each Named Executive Officer's target number of PSUs granted pursuant to the Fiscal 2016,2019, Fiscal 2017,2020, and Fiscal 20182021 LTIPs, which vest upon the schedules described above in "Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Aligning Officers' Interests with Shareholders' Interests - Long Term Incentives", and the market value as of June 30, 20162019 based upon the closing price for the Company's Common Shares as traded on the NASDAQ on such date of $59.16.$41.20.


As of June 30, 2016,2019, options to purchase an aggregate of 4,177,4087,102,753 Common Shares had been previously granted and are outstanding under our stock option plans, of which 1,607,1882,176,002 Common Shares were vested. Options to purchase an additional 2,749,8309,397,479 Common Shares remain available for issuance pursuant to our 2004 Stock Option Plan and our 1998 Stock Option Plan.stock option plans. Our optionoutstanding options pool represents 3.4%2.6% of the Common Shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2016 on a fully diluted basis.2019.
During Fiscal 2016,2019, the Company granted options to purchase 737,6401,870,340 Common Shares or 0.6%0.7% of the Common Shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2016.

2019.
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal 20162019
The following table sets forth certain details with respect to each of the Named Executive Officers concerning the exercise of stock options and vesting of stock in Fiscal 2016:2019:
 Option AwardsStock Awards (3)Option Awards
Stock Awards (3)
Name
Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
(#) 
Value Realized on
Exercise
(1) ($) 
Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(#) 
Value Realized on Vesting
(2) ($)
Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
(#) 
Value Realized on
Exercise(1) 
($) 
Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(#) 
Value Realized on Vesting(2) 
($)
Mark J. Barrenechea
$
69,472
$3,243,343
135,208
$2,801,023
65,820
$7,625,905
John M. Doolittle
$
4,167
$190,557
Steve Murphy
$

$
Madhu Ranganathan
$

$
Muhi Majzoub100,000
$2,592,411
10,900
$1,263,646
Gordon A. Davies
$
14,208
$658,115

$
12,840
$1,486,870
Muhi Majzoub
$
9,234
$427,719
Simon Harrison26,504
$714,495
8,980
$346,808
(1)“Value realized on exercise” is the excess of the market price, at date of exercise, of the shares underlying the options over the exercise price of the options.
(2)“Value realized on vesting” is the market price of the underlying Common Shares on the vesting date.
(3)Relates to (i) the vesting of PSUs and RSUs under our Fiscal 2015 LTIP, and (ii) the vesting of RSUs for Messrs. Barrenechea and Doolittle in accordance with the terms of their respective contractual agreements.2018 LTIP.


POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL
We have entered into employment contracts with each of our Named Executive Officers. These contracts may require us to make certain types of payments and provide certain types of benefits to the Named Executive Officers upon the occurrence of any of these events:
If the Named Executive Officer is terminated without cause; and
If there is a change in control in the ownership of the Company and subsequent to the change in control, there is a change in the relationship between the Company and the Named Executive Officer.
When determining the amounts and the type of compensation and benefits to provide in the event of a termination or change in control described above, we considered available information with respect to amounts payable to similarly situated officers of our peer groups and the position held by the Named Executive Officer within the Company. The amounts payable upon termination or change in control represent the amounts determined by the Company and are not the result of any individual negotiations between us and any of our Named Executive Officers.
Our employment agreements with our Named Executive Officers are similar in structure, terms and conditions, with the key exception of the amount of severance payments, which is determined by the position held by the Named Executive Officer. Details are set out below of each of their potential payments upon a termination by the Company without cause and upon a change in control event where there is a subsequent change in the relationship between the Company and the Named Executive Officer.
Termination Without Cause
If the Named Executive Officer is terminated without cause, we may be obligated to make payments or provide benefits to the Named Executive Officer. A termination without cause means a termination of a Named Executive Officer for any reason other than the following, each of which provides “cause” for termination:
The failure by the Named Executive Officer to attempt in good faith to perform his duties, other than as a result of a physical or mental illness or injury;
The Named Executive Officer's willful misconduct or gross negligence of a material nature in connection with the performance of his duties which is or could reasonably be expected to be injurious to the Company;
The breach by the Named Executive Officer of his fiduciary duty or duty of loyalty to the Company;
The Named Executive Officer's intentional and unauthorized removal, use or disclosure of information relating to the Company, including customer information, which is injurious to the Company or its customers;
The willful performance by the Named Executive Officer of any act of dishonesty or willful misappropriation of funds or property of the Company or its affiliates;
The indictment of the Named Executive Officer or a plea of guilty or nolo contender to a felony or other serious crime involving moral turpitude;
The material breach by the Named Executive Officer of any obligation material to his employment relationship with the Company; or

The material breach by the Named Executive Officer of the Company's policies and procedures which breach causes or could reasonably be expected to cause harm to the Company;
provided that in certain of the circumstances listed above, OpenText has given the Named Executive Officer reasonable notice of the reason for termination as well as a reasonable opportunity to correct the circumstances giving rise to the termination.
Change in Control
If there is a change in control of the Company and within one year of such change in control event, there is a change in the relationship between the Company and the Named Executive Officer without the Named Executive Officer's written consent, we may be obligated to provide payments or benefits to the Named Executive Officer, unless such a change is in connection with the termination of the Named Executive Officer either for cause or due to the death or disability of the Named Executive Officer.
A change in control includes the following events:
The sale, lease, exchange or other transfer, in one transaction or a series of related transactions, of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets;
The approval by the holders of Common Shares of any plan or proposal for the liquidation or dissolution of the Company;
Any transaction in which any person or group acquires ownership of more than 50% of outstanding Common Shares; or

Any transaction in which a majority of the Board is replaced over a twelve-month period and such replacement of the Board was not approved by a majority of the Board still in office at the beginning of such period.
Examples of a change in the relationship between the Named Executive Officer and the Company where payments or benefits may be triggered following a change in control event include:
A material diminution in the duties and responsibilities of the Named Executive Officer, other than (a) a change arising solely out of the Company becoming part of a larger organization following the change in control event or any related change in the reporting hierarchy or (b) a reorganization of the Company resulting in similar changes to the duties and responsibilities of similarly situated executive officers;
A material reduction to the Named Executive Officer's compensation, other than a similar reduction to the compensation of similarly situated executive officers;
A relocation of the Named Executive Officer's primary work location by more than fifty miles;
A reduction in the title or position of the Named Executive Officer, other than (a) a change arising solely out of the Company becoming part of a larger organization following the change in control event or any related change in the reporting hierarchy or (b) a reorganization of the Company resulting in similar changes to the titles or positions of similarly situated executive officers;
None of our Named Executive Officers are entitled to the payments or benefits described below, or any other payments or benefits, solely upon a change in control where there is no change to the Named Executive Officer's relationship with the Company.
Amounts Payable Upon Termination or Change in Control
Generally, upon termination ofPursuant to our employment without cause or following a change in theagreements with our Named Executive Officer's relationship with the Company, in each case, either within twelve months of a change in control event or absent a change in control event, the Named Executive Officer is entitled to either twelve or twenty-four months of compensation, depending upon the Named Executive Officer's position, including short term incentives equal to 100% of the current year's target bonus, 100% of other long-term equity RSU grants, and a pro-rated portion of the LTIP.
With respect to the LTIP, if the termination of employment occurs either without cause or due to a change in the nature of the relationship between the Named Executive OfficerOfficers and the Company, in each case, within twelve monthsterms of a change in control event, the Named Executive Officer is entitled to 100% of his LTIP.
With respect to options, (a) upon termination of employment without cause or following a change in the Named Executive Officer's relationship with the Company, in each case, absent a change in control event, the Named Executive Officer is entitled to exercise those stock options which have vested as of the date of termination; and (b) upon termination of employment without cause or upon a change in the relationship between the Named Executive Officer and the Company, in each case, within twelve months of a change in control event, the Named Executive Officer is entitled to exercise 100% of all outstanding options, which are all deemed immediately vested. The Named Executive Officer shall have 90 days from the

termination date to exercise vested options. In addition, in the case of Mr. Barrenechea, certain of the options granted to him in Fiscal 2012 (2012 Equity Awards) shall continue to vest for a 27 month period and Mr. Barrenechea shall have 90 days from such 27 month period to exercise the vested awards.
Further details ofour LTIP, each Named Executive Officer’s entitlement upon termination of employment without cause or following a change in the Named Executive Officer’s relationship with the Company, both absent a change in control event and within twelve months of a change in control event, are set forth below.
No Change in Control
 No change in control
 Base
Short term incentives
(1)
LTIP
(2)
Non-LTIP RSUs
Options (3)
Options
(3)
Employee and Medical Benefits (4)
Mark J. BarrenecheaTermination without cause or Change in relationship24 months24 monthsProrated100% VestedVested(5)
24 months(5)
John M. DoolittleMadhu RanganathanTermination without cause or Change in relationship12 months12 monthsProrated100% VestedVested12 months
Steve MurphyMuhi MajzoubTermination without cause or Change in relationship12 months12 monthsProrated100% VestedVested12 months
Gordon A. DaviesTermination without cause or Change in relationship12 months12 monthsProratedN/AVested12 months
Muhi MajzoubSimon HarrisonTermination without cause or Change in relationship12 months12 monthsProratedN/AVested12 months
(1)Assuming 100% achievement of the expected targets for the fiscal year in which the triggering event occurred.
(2)LTIP amounts are prorated for the number of months of participation at termination date in the applicable 38 month performance period. If the termination date is before the commencement of the 19th month of the performance period, a prorated LTIP will not be paid.
(3)Already vested as of termination date with no acceleration of unvested options. For a period of 90 days following the termination date, the Named Executive Officer has the right to exercise all options which have vested as of the date of termination.
(4)Employee and medical benefits provided to each Named Executive Officer immediately prior to the occurrence of the trigger event.
(5)In additionaccordance with the terms of his employment agreement, as amended, Mr. Barrenechea is entitled to Mr. Barrenechea’s rightparticipate until the age of 65 in healthcare benefits substantially similar to exercise all options which have vestedwhat he currently receives as Vice Chair, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Technology Officer of the dateCompany. These benefits will be provided at the cost of termination for 90 days following such termination, all options granted tothe Company, provided that Mr. Barrenechea during Fiscal 2012 (Fiscal 2012 Awards) shall continuecontinues to vest during the 27 month period following the date of termination and Mr. Barrenechea shall have another 90 days following this periodbe responsible for funding an amount that is equal to exercise the Fiscal 2012 Awards. Following these deadlines, all unvested options shall terminate. However, if the triggering event occurs within twelve months of a change in control event, then 100% of all outstanding options and the Fiscal 2012 Awards vest and Mr. Barrenechea shall have 90 days to exercise these options.his

employee contribution as Vice Chair, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Technology Officer, unless he becomes employed elsewhere, at which point this benefit will terminate. In the event that the employee or company contribution funding increases, Mr. Barrenechea would be responsible for that increase.
Within 12 Months of a Change in Control
 Within 12 Months of a Change in Control
 Base
Short term incentives
(1)
LTIPNon-LTIP RSUs
Options (2)
Options
(2)
Employee and Medical Benefits (3)
Mark J. BarrenecheaTermination without cause or Change in relationship24 months24 months100% Vested100% Vested100% Vested(4)
24 months(4)
John M. DoolittleMadhu RanganathanTermination without cause or Change in relationship24 months24 months100% Vested100% Vested100% Vested24 months
Steve MurphyMuhi MajzoubTermination without cause or Change in relationship24 months24 months100% Vested100% Vested100% Vested24 months
Gordon A. DaviesTermination without cause or Change in relationship24 months24 months100% VestedN/A100% Vested24 months
Muhi MajzoubSimon HarrisonTermination without cause or Change in relationship24 months24 months100% VestedN/A100% Vested24 months
(1)Assuming 100% achievement of the expected targets for the fiscal year in which the triggering event occurred.
(2)For a period of 90 days following the termination date, the Named Executive Officer has the right to exercise all options which are deemed to have vested as of the date of termination.
(3)Employee and medical benefits provided to each Named Executive Officer immediately prior to the occurrence of the trigger event.
(4)ForIn accordance with the terms of his employment agreement, as amended, Mr. Barrenechea is entitled to participate until the accelerated vesting includes 100% vestingage of 65 in healthcare benefits substantially similar to what he currently receives as Vice Chair, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Technology Officer of the Company. These benefits will be provided at the cost of the Company, provided that Mr. Barrenechea continues to be responsible for funding an amount that is equal to his Fiscal 2012 Awards.employee contribution as Vice Chair, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Technology Officer, unless he becomes employed elsewhere, at which point this benefit will terminate. In the event that the employee or company contribution funding increases, Mr. Barrenechea would be responsible for that increase.
In addition to the information identified above, each Named Executive Officer is entitled to all accrued payments up to the date of termination, including all earned but unpaid short-term incentive amounts and earned but unpaidunsettled LTIP. Except as otherwise required by law, we are required to make all these payments and provide these benefits over a period of 12 months or 24 months, depending on the Named Executive Officer’s entitlement and the circumstances which triggered our obligation to make such payments and provide such benefits, from the date of the event which triggered our obligation. With respect to payments to Mr. Barrenechea, the Company intends to make all required payments to Mr. Barrenechea no later than two and a half months after the end of the later of the fiscal year or calendar year in which the payments are no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture.
In return for receiving the payments and the benefits described above, each Named Executive Officer must comply with certain obligations in favour of the Company, including a non-disparagement obligation. Also, each Named Executive Officer is bound by a confidentiality and non-solicitation agreement where the non-solicitation obligation lasts 6 months from the date of termination of his employment.
Any breach by a Named Executive Officer of any provision of his contractual agreements may only be waived upon the review and approval of the Board.
Quantitative Estimates of Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
Further information regarding payments to our Named Executive Officers in the event of a termination or a change in control may be found in the table below. This table sets forth the estimated amount of payments and other benefits each Named Executive Officer would be entitled to receive upon the occurrence of the indicated event, assuming that the event occurred on June 30, 2016.2019. Amounts (i) potentially payable under plans which are generally available to all salaried employees, such as life and disability insurance, and (ii) earned but unpaid, in both cases, are excluded from the table. The values related to vesting of stock options and awards are based upon the fair market value of our Common Shares of $59.16$41.20 per share as reported on the

NASDAQ on June 30, 2016,2019, the last trading day of our fiscal year. The other material assumptions made with respect to the numbers reported in the table below are:
Payments in Canadian dollars included herein are converted to U.S. dollars using an exchange rate, as of June 30, 2016,2019, of 0.755310; and0.756489;
The salary and incentive payments are calculated based on the amounts of salary, incentive and incentivebenefit payments which were payable to each Named Executive Officer as of June 30, 2016;2019; and

Payments under the LTIPs are calculated as though 100% of Fiscal 20182021 LTIP (granted in Fiscal 2016)2019), Fiscal 20172020 LTIP (granted in Fiscal 2015)2018), and Fiscal 20162019 LTIP (granted in Fiscal 2014)2017) have vested with respect to a termination without cause or change in relationship following a change in control event, and as though a pro-rated amount have vested with respect to no change in control event.
Actual payments made at any future date may vary, including the amount the Named Executive Officer would have accrued under the applicable benefit or compensation plan as well as the price of our Common Shares.
Named Executive OfficerNamed Executive Officer
Salary
($) 
Short-term
Incentive
Payment
($) 
Gain on Vesting of LTIP and Non-LTIP RSUs
($)
Gain on
Vesting of
Stock Options
($) 
Employee
Benefits
($) 
Total
($)
Named Executive Officer
Salary
($) 
Short-term
Incentive
Payment
($) 
Gain on Vesting of LTIP and Non-LTIP RSUs
($)
Gain on
Vesting of
Stock Options
($) 
Employee
Benefits
($) 
Total
($)
Mark J. BarrenecheaTermination Without Cause / Change in Relationship with no Change in Control$1,890,000
$1,890,000
$5,752,399
$4,637,600
$44,163
$14,214,162
Termination Without Cause / Change in Relationship with no Change in Control$1,900,000
$2,850,000
$8,128,977
$
$45,008
(1) 
$12,923,985
Termination Without Cause / Change in Relationship, within 12 months following a Change in Control$1,890,000
$1,890,000
$12,948,586
$10,708,008
$44,163
$27,480,757
Termination Without Cause / Change in Relationship, within 12 months following a Change in Control$1,900,000
$2,850,000
$14,912,752
$21,281,081
$45,008
 $40,988,841
John M. DoolittleTermination Without Cause / Change in Relationship with no Change in Control$377,655
$302,124
$888,294
$
$17,882
$1,585,955
Madhu RanganathanTermination Without Cause / Change in Relationship with no Change in Control$500,000
$500,000
$310,691
$
$3,581
 $1,314,272
Termination Without Cause / Change in Relationship, within 12 months following a Change in Control$755,310
$604,248
$2,013,393
$464,527
$35,764
$3,873,242
Termination Without Cause / Change in Relationship, within 12 months following a Change in Control$1,000,000
$1,000,000
$1,311,396
$1,483,855
$7,162
 $4,802,413
Steve MurphyTermination Without Cause / Change in Relationship with no Change in Control$600,000
$600,000
$1,183,200
$
$1,544
$2,384,744
Muhi MajzoubTermination Without Cause / Change in Relationship with no Change in Control$412,500
$425,000
$1,443,648
$
$10,515
 $2,291,663
Termination Without Cause / Change in Relationship, within 12 months following a Change in Control$1,200,000
$1,200,000
$2,016,174
$2,061,612
$3,088
$6,480,874
Termination Without Cause / Change in Relationship, within 12 months following a Change in Control$825,000
$850,000
$2,760,812
$681,656
$21,029
 $5,138,497
Gordon A. DaviesTermination Without Cause / Change in Relationship with no Change in Control$314,209
$219,795
$1,061,226
$
$18,594
$1,613,824
Termination Without Cause / Change in Relationship with no Change in Control$371,310
$389,592
$1,527,956
$
$16,208
 $2,305,066
Termination Without Cause / Change in Relationship, within 12 months following a Change in Control$628,418
$439,590
$2,506,135
$664,942
$37,188
$4,276,273
Termination Without Cause / Change in Relationship, within 12 months following a Change in Control$742,620
$779,183
$2,737,740
$722,836
$32,417
 $5,014,796
Muhi MajzoubTermination Without Cause / Change in Relationship with no Change in Control$356,000
$249,000
$762,687
$
$5,622
$1,373,309
Simon HarrisonTermination Without Cause / Change in Relationship with no Change in Control$400,000
$437,500
$425,444
$
$107,088
 $1,370,032
Termination Without Cause / Change in Relationship, within 12 months following a Change in Control$712,000
$498,000
$1,972,039
$497,965
$11,244
$3,691,248
Termination Without Cause / Change in Relationship, within 12 months following a Change in Control$800,000
$875,000
$915,052
$621,329
$214,176
 $3,425,557
(1)In accordance with the terms of his employment agreement, as amended, Mr. Barrenechea is entitled to participate until the age of 65 in healthcare benefits substantially similar to what he currently receives as Chief Executive Officer of the Company. These benefits will be provided at the cost of the Company, provided that Mr. Barrenechea continues to be responsible for funding an amount that is equal to his employee contribution as Chief Executive Officer, unless he becomes employed elsewhere, at which point this benefit will terminate. In the event that the employee or company contribution funding increases, Mr. Barrenechea would be responsible for that increase.

Director Compensation for Fiscal 20162019
The following table sets forth summary information concerning the annual compensation received by each of the non-management directors of OpenText for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016.
2019.
 
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($) (1)
Stock
Awards
($) (2)
Option
Awards
($)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
Change in Pension Value and Non-qualified
Deferred Compensation
Earnings
($)
All Other
Compensation
($)
 Total
($)
P. Thomas Jenkins (3)$
$530,136
$
$
N/A$
 $530,136
Randy Fowlie (4)$61,750
$306,708
$
$
N/A$
 $368,458
Gail E. Hamilton (5)$79,000
$240,239
$
$
N/A$
 $319,239
Brian J. Jackman (6)$65,000
$228,709
$
$
N/A$
 $293,709
Stephen J. Sadler (7)$
$296,749
$
$
N/A$770,279
(11)$1,067,028
Michael Slaunwhite (8)$8,250
$334,898
$
$
N/A$
 $343,148
Katharine B. Stevenson (9)$
$314,803
$
$
N/A$
 $314,803
Deborah Weinstein (10)$
$333,602
$
$
N/A$
 $333,602
 
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash
($) (1)
Stock
Awards
($) (2)
Option
Awards
($)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
Change in Pension Value and Non-qualified
Deferred Compensation
Earnings
($)
All Other
Compensation
($)
 Total
($)
P. Thomas Jenkins (3)
$
$559,776
$
$
N/A$
 $559,776
Randy Fowlie (4)
$57,500
$336,309
$
$
N/A$
 $393,809
David Fraser (5)
$75,000
$253,999
$
$
N/A$
 $328,999
Gail E. Hamilton (6)
$91,000
$267,520
$
$
N/A$
 $358,520
Stephen J. Sadler (7)
$
$345,754
$
$
N/A$638,401
(13) 
$984,155
Harmit Singh (8)
$104,083
$247,241
$
$
N/A$
 $351,324
Michael Slaunwhite (9)
$3,500
$386,414
$
$
N/A$
 $389,914
Katharine B. Stevenson (10)
$
$369,904
$
$
N/A$
 $369,904
Carl Jurgen Tinggren (11)
$95,000
$234,915
$
$
N/A$
 $329,915
Deborah Weinstein (12)
$
$382,796
$
$
N/A$
 $382,796
Brain Jackman (14)
$
$15,609
$
$
N/A$
 $15,609
(1)Non-management directors may elect to defer all or a portion of their retainer and/or fees in the form of Common Share equivalent units under our Directors' Deferred Share Unit Plan (DSU Plan) based on the value of the Company's shares as of the date fees would otherwise be paid. The DSU Plan, becameoriginally effective February 2, 2010, and amended and restated in October 2018, is available to any non-management director of the Company and is designed to promote greater alignment of long-term interests between directors of the Company and its shareholders. DSUs granted as compensation for directors fees vest immediately whereas the annual DSU grant vests at the Company’s next annual general meeting. No DSUs are payable by the Company until the director ceases to be a member of the Board.
(2)In Fiscal 2016, Messrs. Jenkins, Fowlie, Jackman, Sadler, and Slaunwhite and Mses. Hamilton, Stevenson and Weinstein received 11,491, 6,615, 4,941, 6,405, 7,222, 5,181, 6,804, and 7,199 DSUs, respectively. The amounts set forth in this column represents the amount recognized as the aggregate grant date fair value of equity-based compensation awards, inclusive of DSU dividend equivalents, as calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 718. These amounts do not reflect whether the recipient has actually realized a financial benefit from the awards. For a discussion of the assumptions used in this valuation, see note 12 “Share Capital, Option Plan and Share-based Payments” to our consolidated financial statements. In Fiscal 2019, Messrs. Jenkins, Fowlie, Fraser, Sadler, Singh, Slaunwhite and Tinggren and Mses. Hamilton, Stevenson and Weinstein received 16,559, 9,844, 7,588, 10,192, 7,398, 11,303, 7,007, 7,875, 10,859, and 11,206 DSUs, respectively.
(3)As of June 30, 2016,2019, Mr. Jenkins holds no options and 28,415107,560 DSUs. Mr. Jenkins serves as Chairman of the Board.
(4)As of June 30, 2016,2019, Mr. Fowlie holds no options and 29,28088,141 DSUs.
(5)As of June 30, 2016, Ms. Hamilton2019, Mr. Fraser holds 12,200 options and 23,1977,588 DSUs.
(6)As of June 30, 2016, Mr. Jackman2019, Ms. Hamilton holds 36,600 options and 18,07769,792 DSUs.
(7)As of June 30, 2016,2019, Mr. Sadler holds no options and 26,86183,405 DSUs.
(8)As of June 30, 2016,2019, Mr. SlaunwhiteSingh holds no options and 34,2007,398 DSUs.
(9)As of June 30, 2016, Ms. Stevenson2019, Mr. Slaunwhite holds 11,000 options and 25,189101,417 DSUs.
(10)As of June 30, 2016,2019, Ms. WeinsteinStevenson holds no options and 31,87382,330 DSUs.
(11)As of June 30, 2019, Mr. Tinggren holds 17,499 DSUs.
(12)As of June 30, 2019, Ms. Weinstein holds 96,712 DSUs.
(13)During Fiscal 2016,2019, Mr. Sadler received $770,279$638,401 in consulting fees, paid or payable in cash, for assistance with acquisition-related business activities. Mr. Sadler abstained from voting on all transactions from which he would potentially derive consulting fees.
(14)Mr. Jackman retired from the board of directors effective September 5, 2019, being the date of our annual general meeting.



Directors who are salaried officers or employees receive no compensation for serving as directors. Mr. Barrenechea was the only employee director in Fiscal 2016.2019. The material terms of our director compensation arrangements are as follows:
Description
Amount and Frequency of Payment
Annual Chairman retainer fee payable to the Chairman of the Board$200,000 per year payable following our Annual General Meeting
  
Annual retainer fee payable to each non-management director$50,00070,000 per director payable following our Annual General Meeting
Annual Independent Lead Director fee payable to the Independent Lead Director$25,000 payable following our Annual General Meeting
  
Annual Audit Committee retainer fee payable to each member of the Audit Committee$25,000 per year payable at $6,250 at the beginning of each quarterly period.
  
Annual Audit Committee Chair retainer fee payable to the Chair of the Audit Committee$10,000 per year payable at $2,500 at the beginning of each quarterly period.
  
Annual Compensation Committee retainer fee payable to each member of the Compensation Committee$15,000 per year payable at $3,750 at the beginning of each quarterly period.
  
Annual Compensation Committee Chair retainer fee payable to the Chair of the Compensation Committee$10,000 per year payable at $2,500 at the beginning of each quarterly period.
  
Annual Corporate Governance Committee retainer fee payable to each member of the Corporate Governance Committee$8,000 per year payable at $2,000 at the beginning of each quarterly period.
  
Annual Corporate Governance Committee Chair retainer fee payable to the Chair of the Corporate Governance Committee$6,000 per year payable at $1,500 at the beginning of each quarterly period.


The Board has adopted a DSU Plan which is available to any non-management director of the Company. In Fiscal 2016,2019, certain directors elected to receive DSUs instead of a cash payment for his or hertheir directors’ fees. In addition to the scheduled fee arrangements set forth in the table above, whether paid in cash or DSUs, non-management directors also receive an annual DSU grant representing the long term component of their compensation. The amount of the annual DSU grant is discretionary; however, historically, the amount of this grant has been determined and updated on a periodic basis with the assistance of the Compensation Committee and the compensation consultant and benchmarked against director compensation for comparable companies. For Fiscal 2019, the annual DSU grant was approximately $225,000 for each non-management director and approximately $295,000 for the Chairman of the Board. As newly elected members of our board, Mr. Singh and Mr. Fraser each also received a pro rata portion of the annual DSU grant to compensate for their initial month of service of approximately $18,750. DSUs granted as compensation for directors fees vest immediately whereas the annual DSU grant vests at the Company’s next annual general meeting. No DSUs are payable by the Company until the director ceases to be a member of the Board.
As with its employees, the Company believes that granting compensation to directors in the form of equity, such as DSUs, promotes a greater alignment of long-term interests between directors of the Company and the shareholders of the Company. DuringCompany and since Fiscal 2016, no stock options were granted to non-management directors and2013 the Company has taken the position that non-management directors will receive DSUs instead of stock options where granting of equity awards is appropriate. All non-management directors have exceeded the Share Ownership Guidelines applicable to them, which is three times their annual retainer. For further details of our Share Ownership Guidelines as they relate to directors, see “Share Ownership Guidelines” above.
The Company does not have a retirement policy for its directors; however, the Company does review its director performance annually as part of its governance process.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The members of our Compensation Committee consist of Messrs.Mr. Slaunwhite (Chair) and JackmanMses. Hamilton and Ms. Weinstein. None of the members of the Compensation Committee have been or are an officer or employee of the Company, or any of our subsidiaries, or had any relationship requiring disclosure herein. None of our executive officers served as a member of the

compensation committee of another entity (or other committee of the board of directors performing equivalent functions, or in the absence of any such committee, the entire board of directors) one of whose executive officers served as a director of ours.

Board's Role in Risk Oversight
The Board has overall responsibility for risk oversight. On an annual basis,The Board is responsible for overseeing management’s implementation and operation of enterprise risk management, reviews oureither directly or through its committees, which shall report to the Board with respect to risk oversight undertaken in accordance with their respective charters.  At least annually, the Board shall review reports provided by management on the risks inherent in the business of the Company (including appropriate crisis preparedness, business continuity, information system controls, cybersecurity and disaster recovery plans), the appropriate degree of risk mitigation and risk control, overall compliance with and the effectiveness of the Company’s risk management policies, and practices and presents the resultsresidual risks remaining after implementation of this review to the Board.risk controls. In addition, each committee reviews and reports to the Board on risk oversight matters, as described below.
The Audit Committee oversees risks related to our accounting, financial statements and financial reporting process. On a quarterly basis, the Audit Committee also reviews reports provided by management on the risks inherent in the business of the Company, including those related to cybersecurity and disaster recovery plans, and reports to the Board with respect to risk oversight undertaken.
The Compensation Committee oversees risks which may be associated with our compensation policies, practices and programs, in particular with respect to our executive officers. The Compensation Committee assesses such risks with the review and assistance of the Company's management and the Compensation Committee's external compensation consultants.
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee monitors risk and potential risks with respect to the effectiveness of the Board, and considers aspects such as director succession, Board composition and the principal policies that guide the Company's overall corporate governance.
The members of each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee are all “independent” directors within the meaning ascribed to it in Multilateral Instrument 52-110-Audit52-110-Audit Committees as well as the listing standards of NASDAQ, and, in the case of the Audit Committee, the additional independence requirements set out by the SEC.
All of our directors are kept informed of our business through open discussions with our management team, including our President and CEO, who serves on our Board. The Board also receives documents, such as quarterly and periodic management reports and financial statements, as well our directors have access to all books, records and reports upon request, and members of management are available at all times to answer any questions which Board members may have.

Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The following table sets forth certain information as of June 30, 20162019 regarding Common Shares beneficially owned by the following persons or companies: (i) each person or company known by us to be the beneficial owner of approximately 5% or more of our outstanding Common Shares, (ii) each director of our Company, (iii) each Named Executive Officer, and (iv) all directors and executive officers as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, we believe that the beneficial owners of the Common Shares listed below have sole investment and voting power with respect to such Common Shares, subject to community property laws where applicable.
The number and percentage of shares beneficially owned as exhibited in Item 12 is based on filings made in accordance with the rules of the SEC, and is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under these rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which a person has sole or shared voting or investment power and also any shares of Common Shares underlying options or warrants that are exercisable by that person within 60 days of June 30, 2016.2019. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each person or entity named in the table is “care of” Open Text Corporation, 275 Frank Tompa Drive, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, N2L 0A1.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership 
Percent of Common
Shares Outstanding 
Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership 
Percent of Common
Shares Outstanding 
Caisse de Depot et Placement du Quebec (1)
1000 Place Jean-Paul Riopelle, Montreal H2Z 2B3
15,956,800
5.91%
Jarislowsky, Fraser Ltd. (1)
1010 Sherbrooke St. West, Montreal QC H3A 2R7
8,587,438
7.07%15,808,651
5.86%
Caisse de Depot et Placement du Quebec (1)
1000 Place Jean-Paul Riopelle, Montreal H2Z 2B3
7,278,400
6.00%
FMR LLC (1)
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
5,708,688
4.70%
P. Thomas Jenkins (2)1,869,289
1.52%3,204,859
1.18%
Mark J. Barrenechea (3)838,258
*1,666,571
*
Michael Slaunwhite (4)246,442
*562,874
*
Randy Fowlie (5)138,522
*292,398
*
Muhi Majzoub (6)111,447
*222,124
*
Stephen J. Sadler (7)97,503
*211,662
*
Brian J. Jackman (8)74,319
*
Katharine B. Stevenson (9)55,631
*
Gail E. Hamilton (10)38,039
*
Deborah Weinstein (11)37,515
*
John M. Doolittle (12)47,453
*
Gordon A. Davies (13)44,555
*
Steve Murphy
*
All executive officers and directors as a group (14)3,784,054
3.08%
Katharine B. Stevenson (8)
128,202
*
Gordon A. Davies (9)
119,746
*
Deborah Weinstein (10)
109,969
*
Madhu Ranganathan (11)
81,615
*
Gail E. Hamilton (12)
77,049
*
Simon Harrison (13)
53,076
*
Carl Jürgen Tinggren (14)
10,756
*
David Fraser (15)
284
*
Harmit Singh (16)
94
*
All executive officers and directors as a group (17)
6,957,189
2.56%


*Less than 1%
(1)Information regarding the shares outstanding is based on information filed in Schedule 13G, 13F, or Schedule 13G/A with the SEC. The percentage of Common Shares outstanding is calculated using the total shares outstanding as of June 30, 2016.2019.
(2)Includes 1,847,3023,106,139 Common Shares owned and 21,98798,720 deferred stock units (DSUs) which are exercisable.
(3)Includes 91,700728,161 Common Shares owned, 685,139744,615 options which are exercisable and 61,419193,795 options which will become exercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2016.2019.
(4)Includes 216,600468,200 Common Shares owned and 29,84294,674 DSUs which are exercisable.
(5)Includes 113,600211,000 Common Shares owned and 24,92281,398 DSUs which are exercisable.
(6)Includes 16,01170,595 Common Shares owned, 85,189116,824 options which are exercisable and 10,24734,705 options which will become exercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2016.2019.
(7)Includes 75,000135,000 Common Shares owned and 22,50376,662 DSUs which are exercisable.
(8)Includes 24,00052,615 Common Shares owned 36,600 options which are exercisable, and 13,71975,587 DSUs which are exercisable.
(9)Includes 23,80047,222 Common Shares owned, 11,00036,264 options which are exercisable and 20,831 DSUs36,260 options which are exercisable.will become exercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2019.
(10)Includes 7,00020,000 Common Shares owned 12,200 options which are exercisable, and 18,83989,969 DSUs which are exercisable.
(11)Includes 10,0001,087 Common Shares owned, and 27,515 DSUs which are exercisable.
(12)Includes 2,125 Common Shares owned, 40,95873,378 options which are exercisable and 4,3707,150 options which will become exercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2016.2019.
(12)Includes 14,000 Common Shares owned and 63,049 DSUs which are exercisable.
(13)Includes 16,53316,762 Common Shares owned, 14,84230,226 options which are exercisable and 13,1806,088 options which will become exercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2016.2019.
(14)Includes 2,455,37510,756 DSUs which are exercisable.
(15)Includes 284 DSUs which are exercisable.
(16)Includes 94 DSUs which are exercisable.
(17)Includes 4,892,004 Common Shares owned, 1,019,0461,139,091 options which are exercisable, 129,475334,901 options which will become exercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2016,2019, and 180,158591,193 DSUs which are exercisable.






Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table sets forth summary information relating to our various stock compensation plans as of June 30, 2016:2019:
Plan Category
Number of securities
to be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants, and rights  
Weighted average
exercise price
of outstanding options,
warrants, and rights 
Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuance
under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column a) 
Number of securities
to be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants, and rights  
Weighted average
exercise price
of outstanding options,
warrants, and rights 
Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuance
under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column a) 
(a)(b)(c)(a)(b)(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:4,177,408$43.872,749,8307,102,753$31.829,397,479
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders :  
Under deferred stock unit awards217,092n/a661,842N/A
Under performance stock unit awards241,232n/a420,323N/A
Under restricted stock unit awards486,994n/a615,966N/A
Total5,122,726n/a2,749,8308,800,884N/A9,397,479
For more information regarding stock compensation plans, please refer to note 12 "Share Capital, Option Plans and Share-Based Payments" to our Consolidated Financial Statements, under Part IV, Item 815 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Related Transactions Policy and Director Independence
We have adopted a written policy that all transactional agreements between us and our officers, directors and affiliates will be first approved by a majority of the independent directors. Once these agreements are approved, payments made pursuant to the agreements are approved by the members of our Audit Committee.
Our procedure regarding the approval of any related party transaction is that the material facts of such transaction shall be reviewed by the independent members of our Audit Committee and the transaction approved by a majority of the independent members of our Audit Committee. The Audit Committee reviews all transactions wherein we are, or will be a participant and any related party has or will have a direct or indirect interest. In determining whether to approve a related party transaction, the Audit Committee generally takes into account, among other facts it deems appropriate: whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances; the extent and nature of the related person's interest in the transaction; the benefits to the company of the proposed transaction; if applicable, the effects on a director's independence; and if applicable, the availability of other sources of comparable services or products.
The Board has determined that all directors, except Messrs. Barrenechea Jenkins and Sadler, meet the independence requirements under the NASDAQ Listing Rules and qualify as “independent directors” under those Listing Rules. Mr. Barrenechea is not considered independent by virtue of being our Vice Chair, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Technology Officer. Subject to compliance with the rules of NASDAQ and the Canadian Securities Administrators, Mr. Jenkins will be considered an “independent director” as of January 1, 2017 (which is three years following termination of his last employment with the Company). See “Transactions with Related Persons” below with respect to payments made to Mr. Sadler. Each of the members of our Compensation Committee, Audit Committee and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is an independent director.
Transactions With Related Persons
One of our directors, Mr. Sadler, received consulting fees for assistance with acquisition-related business activities pursuant to a consulting agreement with the Company. Mr. Sadler's consulting agreement, which was adopted by way of boardBoard resolution effective July 1, 2011, is for an indefinite period. The material terms of the agreement are as follows: Mr. Sadler is paid at the rate of Canadian dollars (CAD) $450 per hour for services relating to his consulting agreement. In addition, he is eligible to receive a bonus fee equivalent to 1.0% of the acquired company's revenues, up to CAD $10.0 million in revenue, plus an additional amount of 0.5% of the acquired company's revenues above CAD $10.0 million. The total bonus fee payable, for any given fiscal year, is subject to an annual limit of CAD $450,000 per single acquisition and an aggregate annual limit of

CAD $980,000. The acquired company's revenues, for this purpose, is equal to the acquired company's revenues for the 12 months prior to the date of acquisition.

During Fiscal 2016,2019, Mr. Sadler received approximately CAD $1.0$0.9 million in consulting fees from OpenText (equivalent to $0.8$0.6 million USD), inclusive of CAD $0.8 million bonus fees for assistance with acquisition-related business activities. Mr. Sadler abstained from voting on all transactions from which he would potentially derive consulting fees.
Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The aggregate fees for professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, for Fiscal 20162019 and Fiscal 20152018 were:
Audit Fees
Audit fees were $3.8 million for Fiscal 2016 and $2.5 million for Fiscal 2015. Such fees were primarily for professional services rendered for (a) the annual audits of our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying attestation report regarding our ICFR contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, (b) the review of quarterly financial information included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, (c) audit services related to mergers and acquisitions, and (d) services related to statutory audits where applicable.
 Year ended June 30,
(In thousands)2019 2018
Audit fees (1)
$4,598
 $4,701
Audit-related fees (2)

 
Tax fees (3)
108
 116
All other fees (4)
40
 101
Total$4,746
 $4,918
(1)Audit fees were primarily for professional services rendered for (a) the annual audits of our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying attestation report regarding our ICFR contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, (b) the review of quarterly financial information included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, (c) audit services related to mergers and acquisitions and offering documents, and (d) annual statutory audits where applicable.
(2)Audit-related fees were primarily for assurance and related services, such as the review of non-periodic filings with the SEC.
(3)Tax fees were for services related to tax compliance, including the preparation of tax returns, tax planning and tax advice.
(4)All other fees consist of fees for services other than the services reported in audit fees, audit-related fees, and tax fees.
Audit-Related Fees
Audit-related fees were approximately $0.1 million for Fiscal 2016 and $0.2 million for Fiscal 2015. Audit-related fees were primarily for assurance and related services, such as the review of non-periodic filings with the SEC.
Tax Fees
The total fees for tax services were approximately $0.03 million for Fiscal 2016 and $0.04 million for Fiscal 2015. These fees were for services related to tax compliance, including the preparation of tax returns, tax planning and tax advice.
Other Fees
None.
Pre-Approval Policy
OpenText's Audit Committee has established a policy of reviewing, in advance, and either approving or not approving, all audit, audit-related, tax and other non-audit services that our independent registered public accounting firm provides to us. This policy requires that all services received from our independent registered public accounting firm be approved in advance by the Audit Committee or a delegate of the Audit Committee (in this regard).Committee. The Audit Committee has delegated the pre-approval responsibility to the Chair of the Audit Committee. All services that KPMG LLP provided to us in Fiscal 20162019 and Fiscal 20152018 have been pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee has determined that the provision of the services as set out above is compatible with the maintaining of KPMG LLP's independence in the conduct of its auditing functions.

PART
Part IV


Item 15.    Exhibits and Financial Statements Schedules


(a) Financial Statements and Schedules

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Item 8)
Page Number
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets atas of June 30, 20162019 and 20152018
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended June 30, 2016, 2015,2019, 2018, and 20142017
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended June 30, 2016, 2015,2019, 2018, and 20142017
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the years ended June 30, 2016, 2015,2019, 2018, and 20142017
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended June 30, 2016, 2015,2019, 2018, and 20142017
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(b) The following documents are filed as a part of this report:
1) Consolidated financial statements and Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and the related notes thereto are included under Item 8, in Part II.
2) Valuation and Qualifying Accounts; see note 34 "Allowance for Doubtful Accounts" and note 14 "Income Taxes" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8, in Part II.
3) Exhibits: The following exhibits are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or are incorporated by reference to exhibits previously filed with the SEC.
Exhibit
Number
  Description of Exhibit
2.1 
2.2 
2.3 
2.4 
2.5 
2.6
3.1 Articles of Amalgamation of the Company. (1)
3.2 Articles of Amendment of the Company. (1)
3.3 Articles of Amendment of the Company. (1)
3.4 Articles of Amalgamation of the Company. (1)
3.5 Articles of Amalgamation of the Company, dated July 1, 2001. (2)
3.6 
3.7 
3.8 
3.9 
3.10 
3.11 
4.1 Form

4.2 Form of Common Share Certificate. (1)
4.3
4.34.4 
4.44.5 
4.54.6 
4.7
4.8
10.1* 1998 Stock Option Plan. (8)
10.2* 
10.3* 
10.4* Open Text
10.5 
10.6* 
10.7* 
10.8* 
10.9* 
10.10* 
10.11 
10.12 
10.13 
10.14 
10.15 
10.16* 
10.17* Employment Agreement, dated July 30, 2014, between John M. Doolittle and the Company. (23)
10.18*
10.20*10.18* 
10.21*10.19* 

10.20
10.21
10.22*
10.23*
10.24
10.25*
10.22*10.26 
12.110.27 Statement
10.28*
18.1 

21.1 
23.1 
31.1  
31.2  
32.1  
32.2  
101.INS  XBRL instance document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
101.SCH  Inline XBRL taxonomy extension schema.
101.CAL  Inline XBRL taxonomy extension calculation linkbase.
101.DEF  Inline XBRL taxonomy extension definition linkbase.
101.LAB  Inline XBRL taxonomy extension label linkbase.
101.PRE  Inline XBRL taxonomy extension presentation.

*    Indicates management contract relating to compensatory plans or arrangements


(1)Filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Registration Statement on Form F-1 (Registration Number 33-98858) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on November 1, 1995 or Amendments 1, 2 or 3 thereto (filed on December 28, 1995, January 22, 1996 and January 23, 1996 respectively), and incorporated herein by reference.
(2)Filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on September 28, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference.
(3)Filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on September 28, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference.
(4)Filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on September 29, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference.

(5)Filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on September 13, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference.
(6)Filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on September 27, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
(7)Filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as filed with the SEC on February 3, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
(8)Filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on August 20, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference.
(9)Filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on September 12, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
(10)Filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on August 26, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
(11)Filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as filed with the SEC on April 30, 2010January 31, 2019 and incorporated herein by reference.
(12)Filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on November 9, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference.
(13)Filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as filed with the SEC on February 2, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference.
(14)Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on July 3, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference.
(15)Filed as an Exhibitexhibit to the Company’s Current ReportCompany's Registration Statement on Form 8-K,S-8, as filed with the SEC on October 2, 2012November 4, 2016, and incorporated herein by reference.
(16)Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as filed with the SEC on November 1, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference.
(17)Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as filed with the SEC on January 25, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.

(18)Filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on August 1, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.
(19)Filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on September 26, 201323, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference.
(20)Filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K/A, as filed with the SEC on November 6, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.
(21)Filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on December 20, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.
(22)Filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on January 16, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.
(23)Filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on July 31, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.
(24)Filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on December 5, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.
(25) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, as fined with the SEC on December 23, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.
(26) Filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on September 13, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference.
(27) Filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on January 15, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference.
(27)(28) Filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on July 29, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference.
(28) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on December 24, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference.
(29) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on October 2, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference.
(30) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on May 31, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference.

(31) Filed as an Exhibit to the Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, as filed with the SEC on December 12, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference.
(32) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on February 22, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference.
(33) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as filed with the SEC on May 8, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference.

(34) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on June 6, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference.
(35) Filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on August 3, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference.
(36) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as filed with the SEC on November 2, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference.
(37) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on February 1, 2018 and incorporated herein by reference.
(38) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on May 30, 2018 and incorporated herein by reference.
(39) Filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on September 26, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.
(40) Filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on August 2, 2018 and incorporated herein by reference.



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





TheTo the Shareholders and Board of Directors and Shareholders of Open Text Corporation

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Open Text Corporation (the Company) as of June 30, 20162019 and June 30, 2015, and2018, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2016. 2019, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2019, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated July 31, 2019 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Changes in Accounting Principles

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, Open Text Corporation adopted two new accounting standards, “Revenues from Contracts with Customers” and "Income Taxes: Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory" on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment to opening retained earnings, in the year ended June 30, 2019.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includesmisstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An auditOur audits also includes assessingincluded evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion,

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements referredthat were communicated or required to above present fairly, in allbe communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material respects,to the consolidated financial positionstatements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of Open Text Corporationcritical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as of June 30, 2016a whole, and June 30, 2015, and its consolidated results of operations and its consolidated cash flows for each ofwe are not, by communicating the years incritical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the three-year period ended June 30, 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.








Allocation of the contract’s transaction price to identified performance obligations
As discussed in Note 23 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company generally sells or licenses its software in combination with other products and services such as customer support and professional services. The accounting for contracts with multiple performance obligations (units of accounting) which include a software license requires an allocation of the contract’s transaction price to the identified performance obligations based on whether the product or service is distinct from some or all of the other products or services in the contract.
The Company generally does not sell or license its products on a standalone basis and as such is required to estimate standalone selling price (SSP) for each performance obligation within these customer contracts with the residual of the contract’s transaction price allocated to the software license performance obligation. This allocation affects the amount and timing of revenue recognized for each performance obligation. SSP for a performance obligation in a contract is an estimate of the price that would be charged for the specific product or service if it was sold separately in similar circumstances and to similar customers.
Considering the nature and volume of contracts with multiple performance obligations including a license product, we identified the evaluation of the allocation of the contract price to the identified performance obligations within these contracts as a critical audit matter because a higher degree of auditor judgment was required in evaluating the methodology and frequency used to establish SSP (observable data, or cost plus margin approach) for the non-license performance obligations of a contract. In addition there was auditor subjectivity in evaluating the assumptions that were used in determining the SSP for each non-license performance obligation. The sensitivity of reasonably possible changes to those assumptions could have a significant impact on the determination of SSP thereby impacting the contract’s transaction price allocation conclusion and the amount and timing of revenues recognized for both the license and non-license performance obligations. Typical assumptions include the basis for stratification of the underlying population for purposes of the SSP evaluation and the impact of geographic or regional specific factors, competitive positioning, internal costs, profit objectives and pricing practices for different performance obligations.
The primary procedures we performed to address the critical audit matter included the following: We tested certain internal controls over the Company’s process to (1) identify the appropriateness of the methodology used to determine SSP over identified non-license performance obligations in contracts that include software licenses (2) compile a complete listing of historical standalone transactions included in the SSP evaluation (3) stratify the complete population of historical standalone transactions based on factors such as geography and level of employee for professional services and (4) capture the relevant information for purposes of establishing a range of observable pricing for the underlying SSP evaluation.
We evaluated the appropriateness of the methodology used to determine SSP by comparing to historical analysis completed by the Company and practices observed in the industry. We evaluated whether there was management bias in the selection of the assumptions used to perform the SSP evaluation. We assessed the stratification of the population used in the SSP evaluation based on our knowledge of factors such as historical period, geography, product category and level of employee for professional services. We inspected a sample of contracts from the population to assess whether attributes such as price and employee consultant level were properly evaluated. For software license contracts with multiple performance obligations, we tested the allocation of the transaction price to each performance obligation.

Assessment of recognition of uncertain tax positions
As discussed in Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements, as of June 30, 2019 the Company has recognized uncertain tax positions including associated interest and penalties. The Company’s tax positions are subject to audit by local taxing authorities across multiple global subsidiaries and the resolution of such audits may span multiple years. Tax law is complex and often subject to varied interpretations, accordingly, the ultimate outcome with respect to taxes the Company may owe may differ from the amounts recognized.
We identified the evaluation of uncertain tax positions as a critical audit matter because a higher degree of auditor judgment was required in evaluating the Company’s interpretation of, and compliance with tax law globally across its multiple subsidiaries. In addition, a higher degree of auditor judgment was required in evaluating the Company’s estimate of the ultimate resolution of its tax positions.
The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following: We tested certain internal controls over the Company’s process to assess uncertain tax positions to (1) interpret tax law and identify uncertain tax

positions (2) evaluate which of the Company’s tax positions may not be sustained upon audit and (3) estimate the uncertain tax positions.

We involved domestic and international tax professionals with specialized skills and knowledge who assisted in obtaining an understanding and assessing tax filed positions, transfer pricing studies and the Company’s compliance with applicable laws and regulations. We evaluated the Company’s interpretation of tax laws by developing an independent assessment based on our understanding and interpretation of tax laws. We inspected settlement documents with applicable taxing authorities, and assessed the expiration of statutes of limitations.



/s/ KPMG LLP

Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2001.
Toronto, Canada
July 31, 2019



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Open Text Corporation adopted new accounting pronouncements, related to the retrospective presentationCorporation:
Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited Open Text Corporation’s (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of deferred income tax assets and liabilities as non-current and the retrospective presentation of debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, in the year ended June 30, 2016.2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), Open Text Corporation’sthe consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of June 30, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2019 and related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated July 31, 2019 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
The Company acquired Liaison Technologies, Inc. on December 17, 2018, and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated July 26, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of Open Text Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ KPMG LLP
Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
Toronto, Canada
July 26, 2016


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Open Text Corporation

We have audited Open Text Corporation’s2019, Liaison Technology, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting associated with total assets of $376.8 million (of which approximately $321.1 million represents goodwill and net intangible assets included within the scope of the assessment) and total revenues of $53.4 million included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended June 30, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee2019. Our audit of Sponsoring Organizationsinternal control over financial reporting of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Open Text Corporation’sCompany also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Liaison Technologies, Inc.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Part II, Item 9A of thisthe accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Open Text Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Open Text Corporationacquired ANXe Business Corporation during Fiscal 2016, and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of Open Text Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2016, ANXe Business Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting associated with total assets of $131 million and total revenues of $7 million included in the consolidated financial statements of Open Text Corporation as of and for the year ended June 30, 2016. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of Open Text Corporation also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of ANXe Business Corporation./s/ KPMG LLP
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of theChartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Open Text Corporation as of June 30, 2016 and June 30, 2015, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2016,and our report dated Accountants
Toronto, Canada
July 26, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.31, 2019



/s/ KPMG LLP
Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
Toronto, Canada
July 26, 2016



OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
June 30, 2016 June 30, 2015June 30, 2019 June 30, 2018
ASSETS      
Cash and cash equivalents$1,283,757
 $699,999
$941,009
 $682,942
Short-term investments11,839
 11,166
Accounts receivable trade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $6,740 as of June 30, 2016 and $5,987 as of June 30, 2015 (note 3)285,904
 284,131
Accounts receivable trade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $17,011 as of June 30, 2019 and $9,741 as of June 30, 2018 (note 4)463,785
 487,956
Contract assets (note 3)20,956
 
Income taxes recoverable (note 14)31,752
 21,151
38,340
 55,623
Prepaid expenses and other current assets59,021
 53,191
97,238
 101,059
Total current assets1,672,273
 1,069,638
1,561,328
 1,327,580
Property and equipment (note 4)183,660
 160,419
Goodwill (note 5)2,325,586
 2,161,592
Acquired intangible assets (note 6)646,240
 679,479
Property and equipment (note 5)249,453
 264,205
Long-term contract assets (note 3)15,386
 
Goodwill (note 6)3,769,908
 3,580,129
Acquired intangible assets (note 7)1,146,504
 1,296,637
Deferred tax assets (note 14)241,161
 181,587
1,004,450
 1,122,729
Other assets (note 7)53,697
 54,946
Deferred charges (note 8)22,776
 37,265
Other assets (note 8)148,977
 111,267
Deferred charges
 38,000
Long-term income taxes recoverable (note 14)8,751
 8,404
37,969
 24,482
Total assets$5,154,144
 $4,353,330
$7,933,975
 $7,765,029
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY      
Current liabilities:      
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (note 9)$257,450
 $241,370
$329,903
 $302,154
Current portion of long-term debt (note 10)8,000
 8,000
10,000
 10,000
Deferred revenues373,549
 358,066
641,656
 644,211
Income taxes payable (note 14)32,030
 17,001
33,158
 38,234
Total current liabilities671,029
 624,437
1,014,717
 994,599
Long-term liabilities:      
Accrued liabilities (note 9)29,848
 34,682
49,441
 52,827
Deferred credits (note 8)8,357
 12,943
Deferred credits
 2,727
Pension liability (note 11)61,993
 56,737
75,239
 65,719
Long-term debt (note 10)2,137,987
 1,549,370
2,604,878
 2,610,523
Deferred revenues37,461
 28,223
46,974
 69,197
Long-term income taxes payable (note 14)149,041
 151,484
202,184
 172,241
Deferred tax liabilities (note 14)79,231
 65,647
55,872
 79,938
Total long-term liabilities2,503,918
 1,899,086
3,034,588
 3,053,172
Shareholders’ equity:      
Share capital (note 12)   
121,404,677 and 122,293,986 Common Shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2016 and June 30, 2015, respectively; Authorized Common Shares: unlimited817,788
 808,010
Additional paid-in capital147,280
 126,417
Share capital and additional paid-in capital (note 12)   
269,834,442 and 267,651,084 Common Shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018, respectively; authorized Common Shares: unlimited1,774,214
 1,707,073
Accumulated other comprehensive income46,310
 51,828
24,124
 33,645
Retained earnings992,546
 863,015
2,113,883
 1,994,235
Treasury stock, at cost (633,647 shares at June 30, 2016 and 625,725 at June 30, 2015, respectively)(25,268) (19,986)
Treasury stock, at cost (802,871 shares at June 30, 2019 and 690,336 shares at June 30, 2018, respectively)(28,766) (18,732)
Total OpenText shareholders' equity1,978,656
 1,829,284
3,883,455
 3,716,221
Non-controlling interests541
 523
1,215
 1,037
Total shareholders’ equity1,979,197
 1,829,807
3,884,670
 3,717,258
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$5,154,144
 $4,353,330
$7,933,975
 $7,765,029
Guarantees and contingencies (note 13)
Related party transactions (note 22)
Subsequent eventsevent (note 23)
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)


 Year Ended June 30,Year Ended June 30,
 2016 2015 20142019 2018 2017
Revenues:           
License $283,710
 $294,266
 $305,846
$428,092
 $437,512
 $369,144
Cloud services and subscriptions
601,018
 605,309
 373,400
907,812
 828,968
 705,495
Customer support 746,409
 731,797
 707,024
1,247,915
 1,232,504
 981,102
Professional service and other 193,091
 220,545
 238,429
284,936
 316,257
 235,316
Total revenues 1,824,228
 1,851,917
 1,624,699
2,868,755
 2,815,241
 2,291,057
Cost of revenues:           
License 10,296
 12,899
 13,161
14,347
 13,693
 13,632
Cloud services and subscriptions 244,021
 237,310
 142,193
383,993
 364,160
 299,850
Customer support 89,861
 94,456
 96,068
124,343
 133,889
 122,565
Professional service and other 155,584
 172,742
 189,403
224,635
 253,389
 194,954
Amortization of acquired technology-based intangible assets (note 6) 74,238
 81,002
 69,917
Amortization of acquired technology-based intangible assets (note 7)183,385
 185,868
 130,556
Total cost of revenues 574,000
 598,409
 510,742
930,703
 950,999
 761,557
Gross profit 1,250,228
 1,253,508
 1,113,957
1,938,052
 1,864,242
 1,529,500
Operating expenses:           
Research and development 194,057
 196,491
 176,834
321,836
 322,909
 281,215
Sales and marketing 344,235
 373,610
 346,941
518,035
 529,141
 444,454
General and administrative 140,397
 162,728
 142,080
207,909
 205,227
 170,353
Depreciation 54,929
 50,906
 35,237
97,716
 86,943
 64,318
Amortization of acquired customer-based intangible assets (note 6) 113,201
 108,239
 81,023
Special charges (note 17) 34,846
 12,823
 31,314
Amortization of acquired customer-based intangible assets (note 7)189,827
 184,118
 150,842
Special charges (recoveries) (note 17)35,719
 29,211
 63,618
Total operating expenses 881,665
 904,797
 813,429
1,371,042
 1,357,549
 1,174,800
Income from operations 368,563
 348,711
 300,528
567,010
 506,693
 354,700
Other income (expense), net (1,423) (28,047) 3,941
10,156
 17,973
 15,743
Interest and other related expense, net (76,363) (54,620) (27,934)(136,592) (138,540) (120,892)
Income before income taxes 290,777
 266,044
 276,535
440,574
 386,126
 249,551
Provision for income taxes (note 14) 6,282
 31,638
 58,461
Provision for (recovery of) income taxes (note 14)154,937
 143,826
 (776,364)
Net income for the period $284,495
 $234,406
 $218,074
$285,637
 $242,300
 $1,025,915
Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests (18) (79) 51
(136) (76) (256)
Net income attributable to OpenText $284,477
 $234,327
 $218,125
$285,501
 $242,224
 $1,025,659
Earnings per share—basic attributable to OpenText (note 21) $2.34
 $1.92
 $1.82
$1.06
 $0.91
 $4.04
Earnings per share—diluted attributable to OpenText (note 21) $2.33
 $1.91
 $1.81
$1.06
 $0.91
 $4.01
Weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding—basic 121,463
 122,092
 119,674
Weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding—diluted 122,038
 122,957
 120,576
Dividends declared per Common Share $0.8300
 $0.7175
 $0.6225
Weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding—
basic (in '000's)
268,784
 266,085
 253,879
Weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding—diluted (in '000's)269,908
 267,492
 255,805
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)



  Year Ended June 30,
  2016 2015 2014
Net income for the period $284,495
 $234,406
 $218,074
Other comprehensive income—net of tax:      
Net foreign currency translation adjustments (3,318) 15,690
 (2,779)
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges:      
Unrealized (loss) (2,574) (6,064) (357)
Loss reclassified into net income 2,956
 5,710
 3,242
Actuarial gain (loss) relating to defined benefit pension plans:      
Actuarial loss (3,374) (3,302) (841)
Amortization of actuarial loss into net income 347
 357
 294
Unrealized net gain (loss) on short-term investments 445
 (12) 
Unrealized gain on marketable securities (Actuate) 
 1,906
 
Release of unrealized gain on marketable securities (Actuate) 
 (1,906) 
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net, for the period (5,518) 12,379
 (441)
Total comprehensive income 278,977
 246,785
 $217,633
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests (18) (79) 51
Total comprehensive income attributable to OpenText $278,959
 $246,706
 $217,684

 Year Ended June 30,
 2019 2018 2017
Net income for the period$285,637
 $242,300
 $1,025,915
Other comprehensive income (loss)—net of tax:     
Net foreign currency translation adjustments(3,882) (9,582) (4,756)
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges:     
Unrealized gain (loss) - net of tax expense (recovery) effect of $6, ($171) and $34 for the year ended June 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively
16
 (476) 95
(Gain) loss reclassified into net income - net of tax (expense) recovery effect of $539, ($489) and $67 for the year ended June 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively1,494
 (1,357) 186
Actuarial gain (loss) relating to defined benefit pension plans:     
Actuarial gain (loss) - net of tax expense (recovery) effect of ($2,004), ($1,846) and $840 for the year ended June 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively(7,421) (3,383) 6,216
Amortization of actuarial (gain) loss into net income - net of tax (expense) recovery effect of $292, $183 and $241 for the year ended June 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively272
 260
 565
Unrealized net gain (loss) on marketable securities - net of tax effect of nil for the year ended June 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017 respectively
 
 184
Release of unrealized gain on marketable securities - net of tax effect of nil for the year ended June 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017 respectively
 (617) 
Total other comprehensive income (loss) net, for the period(9,521) (15,155) 2,490
Total comprehensive income276,116
 227,145
 1,028,405
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests(136) (76) (256)
Total comprehensive income attributable to OpenText$275,980
 $227,069
 $1,028,149
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements




OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(In thousands of U.S. dollars and shares)

OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(In thousands of U.S. dollars and shares)
 Common Shares Treasury Stock 
Additional
Paid in
Capital
 
Accumulated
Retained
Earnings
 
Accumulated  Other
Comprehensive
Income
 Non-Controlling Interest Total
Shares Amount Shares Amount Common Shares and Additional Paid in Capital Treasury Stock Retained
Earnings
 Accumulated  Other
Comprehensive
Income
 Non-Controlling Interests Total
Balance as of June 30, 2013 118,058
 $651,642
 (1,222) $(29,074) $101,865
 $572,885
 $39,890
 $
 $1,337,208
Shares Amount Shares Amount Retained
Earnings
 Accumulated  Other
Comprehensive
Income
 Non-Controlling Interests Total
Balance as of June 30, 2016242,810
 $965,068
 (1,268) $(25,268) 
Issuance of Common Shares                                 
Under employee stock option plans 1,043
 22,221
 
 
 
 
 
 
 22,221
1,012
 20,732
 
 
 
 
 
 20,732
Under employee stock purchase plans 62
 2,338
 
 
 
 
 
 
 2,338
427
 11,604
 
 
 
 
 
 11,604
In connection with acquisitions 2,595
 116,777
 
 
 
 
 
 
 116,777
Under the public Equity Offering19,811
 604,223
 
 
 
 
 
 604,223
Income tax effect related to public Equity offering
 5,077
 
 
 
 
 
 5,077
Equity issuance costs 
 (144) 
 
 
 
 
 
 (144)
 (19,574) 
 
 
 
 
 (19,574)
Share-based compensation 
 
 
 
 19,906
 
 
 
 19,906

 30,507
 
 
 
 
 
 30,507
Income tax effect related to share-based compensation 
 
 
 
 1,844
 
 
 
 1,844

 1,534
 
 
 
 
 
 1,534
Purchase of treasury stock 
 
 (25) (1,275) 
 
 
 
 (1,275)
 
 (244) (8,198) 
 
 
 (8,198)
Issuance of treasury stock 
 
 484
 11,217
 (11,217) 
 
 
 

 (5,946) 410
 5,946
 
 
 
 
Dividend 
 
 
 
 
 (74,693) 
 
 (74,693)
Other comprehensive income (loss) - net 
 
 
 
 
 
 (441) 
 (441)
Dividends declared
($0.4770 per Common Share)

 
 
 
 (120,581) 
 
 (120,581)
Other comprehensive income - net
 
 
 
 
 2,490
 
 2,490
Non-controlling interest 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 352
 352

 229
 
 
 
 
 164
 393
Net income for the year 
 
 
 
 
 218,125
 
 (51) 218,074

 
 
 
 1,025,659
 
 256
 1,025,915
Balance as of June 30, 2014 121,758
 $792,834
 (763) $(19,132) $112,398
 $716,317
 $39,449
 $301
 $1,642,167
Balance as of June 30, 2017264,060
 $1,613,454
 (1,102) $(27,520) $1,897,624
 $48,800
 $961
 $3,533,319
Issuance of Common Shares                                 
Under employee stock option plans 476
 12,159
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12,159
2,870
 54,355
 
 
 
 
 
 54,355
Under employee stock purchase plans 59
 3,017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 3,017
721
 20,458
 
 
 
 
 
 20,458
Share-based compensation 
 
 
 
 22,047
 
 
 
 22,047

 27,594
 
 
 
 
 
 27,594
Income tax effect related to share-based compensation 
 
 
 
 1,675
 
 
 
 1,675
Purchase of treasury stock 
 
 (240) (10,557) 
 
 
 
 (10,557)
Issuance of treasury stock 
 
 377
 9,703
 (9,703) 
 
 
 

 (8,788) 411
 8,788
 
 
 
 
Dividends 
 
 
 
 
 (87,629) 
 
 (87,629)
Dividends declared
($0.5478 per Common Share)

 
 
 
 (145,613) 
 
 (145,613)
Other comprehensive income - net 
 
 
 
 
 
 12,379
 
 12,379

 
 
 
 
 (15,155) 
 (15,155)
Non-controlling interest 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 143
 143
Net income for the year 
 
 
 
 
 234,327
 
 79
 234,406

 
 
 
 242,224
 
 76
 242,300
Balance as of June 30, 2015 122,293
 $808,010
 (626) $(19,986) $126,417
 $863,015
 $51,828
 $523
 $1,829,807
Balance as of June 30, 2018267,651
 $1,707,073
 (691) $(18,732) $1,994,235
 $33,645
 $1,037
 $3,717,258
Issuance of Common Shares 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                 
Under employee stock option plans 468
 14,576
 
 
 
 
 
 
 14,576
1,472
 35,626
 
 
 
 
 
 35,626
Under employee stock purchase plans 120
 5,027
 
 
 
 
 
 
 5,027
711
 21,835
 
 
 
 
 
 21,835
Share-based compensation 
 
 
 
 25,978
 
 
 
 25,978

 26,770
 
 
 
 
 
 26,770
Income tax effect related to share-based compensation 
 
 
 
 230
 
 
 
 230
Purchase of treasury stock 
 
 (225) (10,627) 
 
 
 
 (10,627)
 
 (726) (26,499) 
 
 
 (26,499)
Issuance of treasury stock 
 
 217
 5,345
 (5,345) 
 
 
 

 (16,465) 614
 16,465
 
 
 
 
Common Shares repurchased (1,476) (9,825) 
 
 
 (55,684) 
 
 (65,509)
Dividends 
 
 
 
 
 (99,262) 
 
 (99,262)
Dividends declared
($0.6300 per Common Share)

 
 
 
 (168,859) 
 
 (168,859)
Cumulative effect of ASU 2016-16
 
 
 
 (26,780) 
 
 (26,780)
Cumulative effect of Topic 606
 
 
 
 29,786
 
 
 29,786
Other comprehensive income - net 
 
 
 
 
 
 (5,518) 
 (5,518)
 
 
 
 
 (9,521) 
 (9,521)
Non-controlling interest 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 (625) 
 
 
 
 42
 (583)
Net income for the year 
 
 
 
 
 284,477
 
 18
 284,495

 
 
 
 285,501
 
 136
 285,637
Balance as of June 30, 2016 121,405
 $817,788
 (634) $(25,268) $147,280
 $992,546
 $46,310
 $541
 $1,979,197
Balance as of June 30, 2019269,834
 $1,774,214
 (803) $(28,766) $2,113,883
 $24,124
 $1,215
 $3,884,670


See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
 Year Ended June 30,
 2019 2018 2017
Cash flows from operating activities:     
Net income for the period$285,637
 $242,300
 $1,025,915
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization of intangible assets470,928
 456,929
 345,715
Share-based compensation expense26,770
 27,594
 30,507
Excess tax (benefits) expense on share-based compensation expense
 
 (1,534)
Pension expense4,624
 3,738
 3,893
Amortization of debt issuance costs4,330
 4,646
 5,014
Amortization of deferred charges and credits
 4,242
 6,298
Loss on sale and write down of property and equipment9,438
 2,234
 784
Release of unrealized gain on marketable securities to income
 (841) 
Deferred taxes47,425
 89,736
 (871,195)
Share in net (income) loss of equity investees(13,668) (5,965) (5,952)
Write off of unamortized debt issuance costs
 155
 833
Other non-cash charges
 
 1,033
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:     
Accounts receivable75,508
 (22,566) (126,784)
Contract assets(37,623) 
 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets(819) (7,274) (7,766)
Income taxes and deferred charges and credits27,291
 (31,323) (1,683)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities(21,732) (91,650) 53,490
Deferred revenue(1,827) 35,629
 3,484
Other assets(4) 497
 (21,699)
Net cash provided by operating activities876,278
 708,081
 440,353
Cash flows from investing activities:     
Additions of property and equipment(63,837) (105,318) (79,592)
Proceeds from maturity of short-term investments
 
 9,212
Purchase of Catalyst Repository Systems Inc.(70,800) 
 
Purchase of Liaison Technologies, Inc.(310,644) 
 
Purchase of Hightail, Inc., net of cash acquired
 (20,535) 
Purchase of Guidance Software, Inc., net of cash acquired(2,279) (229,275) 
Purchase of Covisint Corporation, net of cash acquired
 (71,279) 
Purchase of ECD Business
 
 (1,622,394)
Purchase of HP Inc. CCM Business
 
 (315,000)
Purchase of Recommind, Inc.
 
 (170,107)
Purchase consideration for acquisitions completed prior to Fiscal 2017
 
 (7,146)
Other investing activities(16,966) (18,034) (5,937)
Net cash used in investing activities(464,526) (444,441) (2,190,964)
Cash flows from financing activities:     
Excess tax benefits (expense) on share-based compensation expense
 
 1,534
Proceeds from long-term debt and Revolver
 1,200,000
 481,875
Proceeds from issuance of Common Shares from exercise of stock options and ESPP57,889
 75,935
 35,593
Proceeds from issuance of Common Shares under the public Equity Offering
 
 604,223
Repayment of long-term debt and Revolver(10,000) (1,149,620) (57,880)
Debt issuance costs(322) (4,375) (7,240)
Equity issuance costs
 
 (19,574)
Purchase of Treasury Stock(26,499) 
 (8,198)
Purchase of non-controlling interests(583) 
 (208)
Payments of dividends to shareholders(168,859) (145,613) (120,581)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities(148,374) (23,673) 909,544
Foreign exchange gain (loss) on cash held in foreign currencies(3,826) (2,186) 1,767
Increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash during the period259,552
 237,781
 (839,300)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of the period683,991
 446,210
 1,285,510
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of the period$943,543
 $683,991
 $446,210





OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)

 Year Ended June 30,
 2016 2015 2014
Cash flows from operating activities:     
Net income for the period$284,495
 $234,406
 $218,074
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization of intangible assets242,368
 240,147
 186,177
Share-based compensation expense25,978
 22,047
 19,906
Excess tax benefits on share-based compensation expense(230) (1,675) (1,844)
Pension expense4,577
 4,796
 3,232
Amortization of debt issuance costs4,678
 4,556
 3,191
Amortization of deferred charges and credits9,903
 10,525
 11,307
Loss on sale and write down of property and equipment1,108
 1,368
 15
Release of unrealized gain on marketable securities to income
 (3,098) 
Write off of unamortized debt issuance costs
 2,919
 
Deferred taxes(54,461) (14,578) (12,334)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:     
Accounts receivable8,985
 43,189
 (17,186)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets316
 (3,534) 11,146
Income taxes6,294
 2,933
 11,308
Deferred charges and credits
 
 9,870
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities(5,671) (22,714) (36,478)
Deferred revenue(4,781) 6,775
 16,601
Other assets2,163
 (5,031) (5,858)
Net cash provided by operating activities525,722
 523,031
 417,127
Cash flows from investing activities:     
Additions of property and equipment(70,009) (77,046) (42,268)
Proceeds from maturity of short-term investments11,297
 17,017
 
Purchase of CEM Business(152,711) 
 
Purchase of ANXe Business Corporation(104,570) 
 
Purchase of Daegis Inc., net of cash acquired(22,146) 
 
Purchase of Actuate Corporation, net of cash acquired(8,153) (291,800) 
Purchase of Informative Graphics Corporation, net of cash acquired(3,464) (35,180) 
Purchase of GXS Group, Inc., net of cash acquired
 
 (1,076,886)
Purchase of Cordys Holding BV, net of cash acquired
 
 (30,588)
Purchase of ICCM Professional Services Limited, net of cash acquired(2,027) 
 
Purchase of a division of Spicer Corporation
 (222) 
Purchase of patents
 
 (192)
Purchase consideration for prior period acquisitions
 (590) (887)
Other investing activities(9,393) (10,574) (2,547)
Net cash used in investing activities(361,176) (398,395) (1,153,368)
Cash flows from financing activities:     
Excess tax benefits on share-based compensation expense230
 1,675
 1,844
Proceeds from issuance of Common Shares20,097
 15,240
 24,808
Proceeds from long-term debt600,000
 800,000
 800,000
Repayment of long-term debt and revolver(8,000) (530,284) (45,911)
Debt issuance costs(6,765) (18,271) (16,685)
Equity issuance costs
 
 (144)
Common Shares repurchased(65,509) 
 
Purchase of Treasury Stock(10,627) (10,126) (1,275)
Payments of dividends to shareholders(99,262) (87,629) (74,693)
Net cash provided by financing activities430,164
 170,605
 687,944
Foreign exchange gain (loss) on cash held in foreign currencies(10,952) (23,132) 5,742
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents during the period583,758
 272,109
 (42,555)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period699,999
 427,890
 470,445
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period$1,283,757
 $699,999
 $427,890
Reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash:June 30, 2019 June 30, 2018 June 30, 2017
Cash and cash equivalents$941,009
 $682,942
 $443,357
Restricted cash included in Other assets2,534
 1,049
 2,853
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash$943,543
 $683,991
 $446,210
Supplemental cash flow disclosures (note 20)
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Year Ended June 30, 20162019
(Tabular amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

NOTE 1—BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Open Text Corporation and our subsidiaries, collectively referred to as "OpenText" or the "Company". We wholly own all of our subsidiaries with the exception of Open Text South Africa Proprietary Ltd. (OT South Africa), GXS, Inc. (GXS Korea) and EC1 Pte. Ltd. (GXS Singapore), which as of June 30, 2016,2019, were 90%, 85%70% and 81% owned, respectively, by OpenText. All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Previously, our ownership in GXS Inc. (GXS Korea) was 85%. During the first quarter of Fiscal 2019, we acquired all of the outstanding non-controlling interests in GXS Korea for $0.6 million in cash.
These Consolidated Financial Statements are expressed in U.S. dollars and are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP). The information furnished reflects all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the periods presented and includes the financial results of DaegisLiaison Technologies, Inc. (Daegis)(Liaison), with effect from November 23, 2015, certain customer experience softwareDecember 17, 2018, and services assets and liabilities acquired from HPCatalyst Repository Systems Inc. (CEM Business)(Catalyst), with effect from April 30, 2016, and ANXe Business Corporation (ANX) with effect from May 1, 2016January 31, 2019 (see note 18)18 "Acquisitions").
Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements. These estimates, judgments and assumptions are evaluated on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable at that time, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from those estimates. In particular, significantkey estimates, judgments and assumptions include those related to: (i) revenue recognition, (ii) allowanceaccounting for doubtful accounts,income taxes, (iii) testing of goodwill for impairment, (iv) the valuation of acquired intangible assets, (v) the valuation of long-lived assets, (vi) the recognition of contingencies, (vii) restructuring accruals, (viii) acquisition accruals and pre-acquisition contingencies, (ix) the realization of investment tax credits, (x) the valuation of stock options granted and obligations related to share-based payments, including the valuation of our long-term incentive plan,plans, and (xi) the valuation of pension obligations.
Impact of Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
Revenue Recognition
Effective July 1, 2018, we adopted Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 606 "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" (Topic 606) using the cumulative effect approach. We applied the accounting standard to contracts that were not completed as of the date of the initial adoption. Results for reporting periods commencing on July 1, 2018 are presented under the new revenue standard, while prior period results continue to be reported under the previous revenue standard. As a result of this adoption, we recorded a net increase of approximately $30 million to retained earnings as of July 1, 2018 on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, with the following corresponding impacts:
A decrease to deferred revenues of approximately $31 million;
A decrease to other assets of approximately $22 million in connection with deferred implementation costs;    
An increase to other assets of approximately $14 million in connection with the capitalization of sales commission costs;
An increase in contract assets of approximately $18 million representing future billings in excess of revenues; and obligations, and (xii) accounting
An increase in net deferred tax liabilities of approximately $11 million.    


Please refer to Note 3 "Revenues" for income taxes.additional information relating to Topic 606, including our updated revenue recognition policies.
Reclassifications
CertainAdditionally, certain prior period balances have been reclassified within other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, to conform to the current period presentation includingas a result of this adoption. Please refer to Note 8 "Other Assets" for details.
Income Taxes
Effective July 1, 2018, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-16, "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory" (ASU 2016-16) which requires entities to recognize the reclassification relatedincome tax consequence of an intra-entity transfer of an asset, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs. We adopted ASU 2016-16 on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment to a change inopening retained earnings. Results for reporting periods effective as of July 1, 2018 are presented under the method of allocating certain operating expenses withinnew standard, while prior period results continue to be reported under the Company.previous standard. As a result of such reclassifications,this adoption, we recorded a net decrease of approximately $27 million to retained earnings as of July 1, 2018 on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, with the following expensescorresponding impacts:
A decrease to deferred charges of approximately $38 million;
An increase to deferred tax assets of approximately $8 million; and
A decrease to deferred credits of approximately $3 million.
There was no impact to the Consolidated Statements of Income, Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income or Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as a result of this adoption.
Restricted Cash
Effective July 1, 2018, we adopted ASU No. 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash” (ASU 2016-18), which requires amounts described as restricted cash and cash equivalents to be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts in the statement of cash flows. We adopted ASU 2016-18 using the retrospective method. As a result, certain prior period comparative figures in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows have been reclassified for Fiscal 2015adjusted to conform to current period presentation as follows:
 Year Ended June 30, 2018 Year Ended June 30, 2017
 As Previously Reported Adjustments As Adjusted As Previously Reported Adjustments As Adjusted
            
Net cash provided by operating activities$709,885
 $(1,804) $708,081
 $439,253
 $1,100
 $440,353
            
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period443,357
 2,853
 446,210
 1,283,757
 1,753
 1,285,510
Increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash during the period239,585
 (1,804) 237,781
 (840,400) 1,100
 (839,300)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period$682,942
 $1,049
 $683,991
 $443,357
 $2,853
 $446,210

There was no impact to the Consolidated Balance Sheets, Consolidated Statements of Income, Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity or Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income as a result of this adoption.
Pension Expense
Effective July 1, 2018, we adopted ASU No. 2017-07, “Retirement Benefits - Presentation of Net Period Pension Costs (Topic 715)” (ASU 2017-07), which provides guidance on the capitalization, presentation and Fiscal 2014disclosure of net benefit costs related to postretirement benefit plans. Upon adoption, only service-related net periodic pension costs will be recorded within operating expense. All other non-service related net periodic pension costs will be classified under "Interest and other related expense" on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. We adopted ASU 2017-07 on a retrospective basis. As a result, certain prior period comparative figures in the Consolidated Statements of Income have been adjusted to conform to current period presentation as follows:
 Year Ended June 30,
 2015 2014
Reclassifications within cost of revenue   
Decrease to cost of revenue - Cloud services and subscriptions$(2,409) $(473)
Increase (decrease) to cost of revenue - Customer support$(310) $89
Decrease to cost of revenue - Professional services and other$(657) $(544)
Reclassifications within operating expenses   
Decrease to operating expense - General and administrative$(314) $(370)
Increase to operating expense - Sales and marketing$3,690
 $1,298

 Year Ended June 30, 2018 Year Ended June 30, 2017
 As Previously Reported Adjustments As Adjusted As Previously Reported Adjustments As Adjusted
Cost of revenues - Cloud services$364,091
 $69
 $364,160
 $300,255
 $(405) $299,850
Cost of revenues - Customer Support$134,089
 $(200) $133,889
 $122,753
 $(188) $122,565
Cost of revenues - Professional service and other$253,670
 $(281) $253,389
 $195,195
 $(241) $194,954
Total cost of revenues$951,411
 $(412) $950,999
 $762,391
 $(834) $761,557
Gross profit$1,863,830
 $412
 $1,864,242
 $1,528,666
 $834
 $1,529,500
Research and Development$323,461
 $(552) $322,909
 $281,680
 $(465) $281,215
Sales and Marketing$529,381
 $(240) $529,141
 $444,838
 $(384) $444,454
General and administrative$205,313
 $(86) $205,227
 $170,438
 $(85) $170,353
Total operating expense$1,358,427
 $(878) $1,357,549
 $1,175,734
 $(934) $1,174,800
Income from operations$505,403
 $1,290
 $506,693
 $352,932
 $1,768
 $354,700
Interest and other related expense, net$(137,250) $(1,290) $(138,540) $(119,124) $(1,768) $(120,892)

There was no change to income from operations, net income or net incomeearnings per share in any of the periods presented as a result of these reclassifications.this adoption.Additionally, there was no impact to the Consolidated Balance Sheets, Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity or Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as a result of this adoption.

NOTE 2—ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Accounting Policies
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include balances with banks as well as deposits that have terms to maturity of three months or less. Cash equivalents are recorded at cost and typically consist of term deposits, commercial paper, certificates of deposit and short-term interest bearing investment-grade securities of major banks in the countries in which we operate.
Short-Term Investments
In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 320 "Investments - DebtAccounts Receivable and Equity Securities" (Topic 320) related to accounting for certain investments in debt and equity securities, and based on our intentions regarding these instruments, we classify our marketable securities as available for sale and account for these investments at fair value. Marketable securities consist primarily of high quality debt securities with original maturities over 90 days, and may include corporate notes, United States government agency notes and municipal notes.
Allowance for doubtful accounts
From time to time, we may sell certain accounts receivable to a financial institution on a non-recourse basis for cash, less a discount. Proceeds from the sale of receivables approximate their discounted book value are included in operating cash flows on the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.
We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of customers to make payments. We evaluate the creditworthiness of our customers prior to order fulfillment and based on these evaluations, we adjust our credit limit to the respective customer. In addition to these evaluations, we conduct on-going credit evaluations of our customers' payment history and current creditworthiness. The allowance is maintained for 100% of all accounts deemed to be uncollectible and, for those receivables not specifically identified as uncollectible, an allowance is maintained for a specific percentage of those receivables based upon the aging of accounts, our historical collection experience and current economic expectations. To date, the actual losses have been within our expectations. No single customer accounted for more than 10% of the accounts receivable balance as of June 30, 20162019 and 2015.2018.
Property and equipment
Property and equipment are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value, and shown net of depreciation which is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Gains and losses on asset disposals are taken into income in the year of disposition. Fully depreciated property and equipment are retired from the consolidated balance sheet when they are no longer in use. We did not recognize any significant property and equipment impairment charges in Fiscal 2016,2019, Fiscal 2015,2018, or Fiscal 2014.2017. The following represents the estimated useful lives of property and equipment: equipment as of June 30, 2019:

Furniture and fixtures5 years
Office equipment5 years
Computer hardware3 years
Computer software3 to 7 years
Capitalized software3 to 5 years
Leasehold improvementsLesser of the lease term or 5 years
Building40 years

Capitalized Software
We capitalize software development costs in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 350-40 – Accounting"Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal-Use.Internal-Use". We capitalize costs for software to be used internally when we enter the application development stage. This occurs when we complete the preliminary project stage, management authorizes and commits to funding the project, and it is feasible that the project will be completed and the software will perform the intended function. We cease to capitalize costs related to a software project when it enters the post implementation and operation stage. If different determinations are made with respect to the state of development of a software project, then the amount capitalized and the amount charged to expense for that project could differ materially.
Costs capitalized during the application development stage consist of payroll and related costs for employees who are directly associated with, and who devote time directly to, a project to develop software for internal use. We also capitalize the direct costs of materials and services, which generally includes outside contractors, and interest. We do not capitalize any general and administrative or overhead costs or costs incurred during the application development stage related to training or data conversion costs. Costs related to upgrades and enhancements to internal-use software, if those upgrades and

enhancements result in additional functionality, are capitalized. If upgrades and enhancements do not result in additional functionality, those costs are expensed as incurred. If different determinations are made with respect to whether upgrades or enhancements to software projects would result in additional functionality, then the amount capitalized and the amount charged to expense for that project could differ materially.
We amortize capitalized costs with respect to development projects for internal-use software when the software is ready for use. The capitalized software development costs are generally amortized using the straight-line method over a 5-year3 to 5 year period. In determining and reassessing the estimated useful life over which the cost incurred for the software should be amortized, we consider the effects of obsolescence, technology, competition and other economic factors. If different determinations are made with respect to the estimated useful life of the software, the amount of amortization charged in a particular period could differ materially.
As of June 30, 20162019 and 20152018 our capitalized software development costs were $53.5$95.7 million and $38.6$81.1 million, respectively. Our additions, relating to capitalized software development costs, incurred during Fiscal 20162019 and Fiscal 20152018 were $14.9$14.3 million and $18.6$14.6 million, respectively.
Acquired intangibles
Acquired intangibles consist of acquired technology and customer relationships associated with various acquisitions.
Acquired technology is initially recorded at fair value based on the present value of the estimated net future income-producing capabilities of software products acquired on acquisitions. We amortize acquired technology over its estimated useful life on a straight-line basis.
Customer relationships represent relationships that we have with customers of the acquired companies and are either based upon contractual or legal rights or are considered separable; that is, capable of being separated from the acquired entity and being sold, transferred, licensed, rented or exchanged. These customer relationships are initially recorded at their fair value based on the present value of expected future cash flows. We amortize customer relationships on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives.
We continually evaluate the remaining estimated useful life of our intangible assets being amortized to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining period of amortization.

Impairment of long-lived assets
We account for the impairment and disposition of long-lived assets in accordance with ASC Topic 360, “Property, Plant, and Equipment” (Topic 360). We test long-lived assets or asset groups, such as property and equipment and definite lived intangible assets, for recoverability when events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. Circumstances which could trigger a review include, but are not limited to: significant adverse changes in the business climate or legal factors; current period cash flow or operating losses combined with a history of losses or a forecast of continuing losses associated with the use of the asset; and a current expectation that the asset will more likely than not be sold or disposed of before the end of its estimated useful life.
Recoverability is assessed based on comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the aggregate pre-tax undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposal of the asset or asset group. Impairment is recognized when the carrying amount is not recoverable and exceeds the fair value of the asset or asset group. The impairment loss, if any, is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds fair value, which for this purpose is based upon the discounted projected future cash flows of the asset or asset group.
We have not recorded any significant impairment charges for long-lived assets during Fiscal 2016,2019, Fiscal 20152018 and Fiscal 2014.2017.
Business combinations
We apply the provisions of ASC Topic 805, “Business Combinations” (Topic 805), in the accounting for our acquisitions. It requires us to recognize separately from goodwill the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at their acquisition date fair values. Goodwill as of the acquisition date is measured as the excess of consideration transferred over the net of the acquisition date fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. While we use our best estimates and assumptions to accurately value assets acquired and liabilities, including contingent consideration where applicable, assumed at the acquisition date, our estimates are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement, particularly since these assumptions and estimates are based in part on historical experience and information obtained from the management of the acquired companies.Ascompanies. As a result, during the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date, we may record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the corresponding offset to goodwill in the period identified. Furthermore, when valuing certain intangible assets that we have acquired, critical estimates may be made relating to, but not limited to: (i) future expected cash flows from software license sales, cloud SaaS, DaaS and PaaS contracts, support agreements, consulting agreements and other

customer contracts (ii) the acquired company's brandtechnology and competitive position, as well as assumptions about the period of time that the acquired brandtechnology will continue to be used in the combined company's product portfolio, and (iii) discount rates. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period or final determination of the values of assets acquired or liabilities assumed, whichever comes first, any subsequent adjustments would be recorded to our consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of operations.Income.
For a given acquisition, we generallymay identify certain pre-acquisition contingencies as of the acquisition date and may extend our review and evaluation of these pre-acquisition contingencies throughout the measurement period in order to obtain sufficient information to assess whether we include these contingencies as a part of the purchase price allocation and, if so, to determine the estimated amounts.
If we determine that a pre-acquisition contingency (non-income tax related) is probable in nature and estimable as of the acquisition date, we record our best estimate for such a contingency as a part of the preliminary purchase price allocation. We often continue to gather information and evaluate our pre-acquisition contingencies throughout the measurement period and if we make changes to the amounts recorded or if we identify additional pre-acquisition contingencies during the measurement period, such amounts will be included in the purchase price allocation during the measurement period and, subsequently, in our results of operations.
Uncertain tax positions and tax related valuation allowances assumed in connection with a business combination are initially estimated as of the acquisition date. We review these items during the measurement period as we continue to actively seek and collect information relating to facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date. Changes to these uncertain tax positions and tax related valuation allowances made subsequent to the measurement period, or if they relate to facts and circumstances that did not exist at the acquisition date, are recorded in our provisionthe "Provision for (recovery of) income taxes intaxes" line of our Consolidated Statements of Income.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price in a business combination over the fair value of net tangible and intangible assets acquired. The carrying amount of goodwill is periodically reviewed for impairment (at a minimum annually) and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of this asset may not be recoverable.

Our operations are analyzed by management and our chief operating decision maker (CODM) as being part of a single industry segment: the design, development, marketing and sales of Enterprise Information Management (EIM) software and solutions. Therefore, our goodwill impairment assessment is based on the allocation of goodwill to a single reporting unit.
We perform a qualitative assessment to test our reporting unit's goodwill for impairment. Based on our qualitative assessment, if we determine that the fair value of our reporting unit is more likely than not (i.e., a likelihood of more than 50 percent) to be less than its carrying amount, the twosecond step of the impairment test is performed. In the firstsecond step of the impairment test, we compare the fair value of our reporting unit to its carrying value. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is not considered impaired and we are not required to perform further testing. If the carrying value of the net assets of our reporting unit exceeds its fair value, then we must perform the second step of the two step impairment test in order to determine the implied fair value of our reporting unit's goodwill. If the carrying value our reporting unit's goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, then an impairment loss equal to the difference, but not exceeding the total carrying value of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit, would be recorded.
Our annual impairment analysis of goodwill was performed as of April 1, 2016.2019. Our qualitative assessment indicated that there were no indications of impairment and therefore there was no impairment of goodwill required to be recorded for Fiscal 20162019 (no impairments were recorded for Fiscal 20152018 and Fiscal 2014)2017).
Derivative financial instruments
We use derivative financial instruments to manage foreign currency rate risk. We account for these instruments in accordance with ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” (Topic 815), which requires that every derivative instrument be recorded on the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value as of the reporting date. Topic 815 also requires that changes in our derivative financial instruments' fair values be recognized in earnings; unless specific hedge accounting and documentation criteria are met (i.e. the instruments are accounted for as hedges). We recorded the effective portions of the gain or loss on derivative financial instruments that were designated as cash flow hedges in accumulated"Accumulated other comprehensive income,income", net of tax, in our accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Any ineffective or excluded portion of a designated cash flow hedge, if applicable, was recognized in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

Asset retirement obligations
We account for asset retirement obligations in accordance with ASC Topic 410, “Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations” (Topic 410), which applies to certain obligations associated with “leasehold improvements” within our leased office facilities. Topic 410 requires that a liability be initially recognized for the estimated fair value of the obligation when it is incurred. The associated asset retirement cost is capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset and depreciated over the remaining life of the underlying asset and the associated liability is accreted to the estimated fair value of the obligation at the settlement date through periodic accretion charges recorded within general and administrative expenses. When the obligation is settled, any difference between the final cost and the recorded amount is recognized as income or loss on settlement in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
Revenue recognition
License revenues
We recognize revenues inIn accordance with ASC Topic 985-605, “Software Revenue Recognition” (Topic 985-605).
We record product revenues from software licenses and products606, we account for a customer contract when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,we obtain written approval, the software product has been shipped, there are no significant uncertainties surrounding product acceptance bycontract is committed, the customer, the fees are fixed and determinable, and collection is considered probable. We use the residual method to recognize revenues on delivered elements when a license agreement includes one or more elements to be delivered at a future date if evidencerights of the fair value of all undelivered elements exists. If an undelivered element forparties, including the arrangement exists under the license arrangement, revenues related to the undelivered element is deferred based on vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) of the fair value of the undelivered element.
Our multiple-element sales arrangements include arrangements where software licenses and the associated post contract customer support (PCS) are sold together. We have established VSOE of the fair value of the undelivered PCS element based on the contracted price for renewal PCS included in the original multiple element sales arrangement, as substantiated by contractual terms and our significant PCS renewal experience, from our existing worldwide base. Our multiple element sales arrangements generally include irrevocable rights for the customer to renew PCS after the bundled term ends. The customer is not subject to any economic or other penalty for failure to renew. Further, the renewal PCS options are for services comparable to the bundled PCS and cover similar terms.
It is our experience that customers generally exercise their renewal PCS option. In the renewal transaction, PCS is sold on a stand-alone basis to the licensees one year or more after the original multiple element sales arrangement. The exercised renewal PCS price is consistent with the renewal price in the original multiple element sales arrangement, although an adjustment to reflect consumer price changes is common.
If VSOE of fair value does not exist for all undelivered elements, all revenues are deferred until sufficient evidence exists or all elements have been delivered.
We assess whether payment terms, are customaryidentified, the contract has commercial substance and consideration is probable of collection. Revenue is recognized when, or extendedas, control of a promised product or service is transferred to our customers in accordance with normal practice relativean amount that reflects the consideration we expect to the marketbe entitled to in which the sale is occurring. Our sales arrangements generally include standard payment terms. These terms effectively relate to all customers,exchange for our products and arrangements regardlessservices (at its transaction price). Estimates of customer type, product mix or arrangement size. Exceptions are only madevariable consideration and the determination of whether to these standard terms for certain salesinclude estimated amounts in parts of the world where local practice differs. In these jurisdictions, our customary payment terms are in line with local practice.
Cloud services and subscriptions revenues
Cloud services and subscription revenues consist of (i) software as a service offerings (ii) managed service arrangements and  (iii) subscription revenues relating to on premise offerings.  The customer contracts for each of these three offerings are long term contracts (greater than twelve months) andtransaction price are based on readily available information, which may include historical, current and forecasted information, taking into consideration the customer’s usage overtype of customer, the contract  period. Thetype of transaction and specific facts and circumstances of each arrangement. We report revenue associated with such  contracts is recognized once usage has been measured, the fee is fixed and determinable and collection is probable.
In certain managed services arrangements, we sell transaction processing along with implementation and start-up services. The implementation and start-up services do not have stand-alone value and, therefore, they do not qualify as separate units of accounting and are not separated. We believe these services do not have stand-alone value as the customer only receives value from these services in conjunction with the use of the related transaction processing service, we do not sell such services separately, and the output of such services cannot be re-sold by the customer. Revenues related to implementation and start-up services are recognized over the longer of the contract term or the estimated customer life. In some arrangements, we also sell professional services which do have stand-alone value and can be separated from other elements in the arrangement. The revenue related to these services is recognized as the service is performed. In some arrangements, we also sell professional

services as a separate single element arrangement. The revenue related to these services is recognized as the service is performed.
We defer all direct and relevant costs associated with implementation of long-term customer contracts to the extent such costs can be recovered through guaranteed contract revenues.
Service revenues
Service revenues consist of revenues from consulting, implementation, training and integration services. These services are set forth separately in the contractual arrangements such that the total price of the customer arrangement is expected to vary as a result of the inclusion or exclusion of these services. For those contracts where the services are not essential to the functionalitynet of any other element of the transaction, we determine VSOE of fair value for these services based upon normal pricing and discounting practices for these services when sold separately. These consulting and implementation services contracts are primarily time and materials based contractsrevenue-based taxes assessed by governmental authorities that are imposed on average, less than six months in length. Revenues from these services are recognized at the time such services are performed.
We also enter into contracts that are primarily fixed fee arrangements wherein the services are not essentialand concurrent with specific revenue producing transactions. Refer to the functionality of a software element. In such cases, the proportional performance method is applied to recognize revenues.
Revenues from training and integration services are recognized in the period in which these services are performed.
Customer support revenues
Customer support revenues consist of revenues derived from contracts to provide PCS to license holders. These revenues are recognized ratably over the term of the contract. Advance billings of PCS are not recorded to the extent that the term of the PCS has not commenced and payment has not been received.
Deferred revenues
Deferred revenues primarily relate to support agreements which have been paidnote 3 "Revenues" for by customers prior to the performance of those services. Generally, the services will be provided in the twelve months after the signing of the agreement.
Long-term sales contracts
We may enter into certain long-term sales contracts involving the sale of integrated solutions that include the modification and customization of software and the provision of services that are essential to the functionality of the other elements in this arrangement. As prescribed by ASC Topic 985-605, we recognize revenues from such arrangements in accordance with the contract accounting guidelines in ASC Topic 605-35, “Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts” (Topic 605-35), after evaluating for separation of any non-Topic 605-35 elements in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 605-25, “Multiple-Element Arrangements” (Topic 605-25).
When circumstances exist that allow us to make reasonably dependable estimates of contract revenues, contract costs and the progress of the contract to completion, we account for sales under such long-term contracts using the percentage-of-completion (POC) method of accounting. Under the POC method, progress towards completion of the contract is measured based upon either input measures or output measures. We measure progress towards completion based upon an input measure and calculate this as the proportion of the actual hours incurred compared to the total estimated hours. For training and integration services rendered under such contracts, revenues are recognized as the services are rendered. We will review, on a quarterly basis, the total estimated remaining costs to completion for each of these contracts and apply the impact of any changes on the POC prospectively. If at any time we anticipate that the estimated remaining costs to completion will exceed the value of the contract, the resulting loss will be recognized immediately.
When circumstances exist that prevent us from making reasonably dependable estimates of contract revenues, we account for sales under such long-term contracts using the completed contract method.
Sales to resellers and channel partners
We execute certain sales contracts through resellers and distributors (collectively, resellers) and also large, well-capitalized partners such as SAP AG and Accenture Inc. (collectively, channel partners).
We recognize revenues relating to sales through resellers and channel partners when all the recognition criteria have been met, in other words, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred in the reporting period, the fee is fixed and determinable, and collectability is probable. In addition we assess the creditworthiness of each reseller and if the reseller is newly formed, undercapitalized or in financial difficulty any revenues expected to emanate from such resellers are deferred and recognized only when cash is received and all otherour full revenue recognition criteria are met.

Rights of return and other incentives
We do not generally offer rights of return or any other incentives such as concessions, product rotation, or price protection and, therefore, do not provide for or make estimates of rights of return and similar incentives.policy.
Research and development costs
Research and development costs internally incurred in creating computer software to be sold, licensed or otherwise marketed are expensed as incurred unless they meet the criteria for deferral and amortization, as described in ASC Topic 985-20, “Costs of Software to be Sold, Leased, or Marketed” (Topic 985-20). In accordance with Topic 985-20, costs related to research, design and development of products are charged to expense as incurred and capitalized between the dates that the product is considered to be technologically feasible and is considered to be ready for general release to customers. In our historical experience, the dates relating to the achievement of technological feasibility and general release of the product have substantially coincided. In addition, no significant costs are incurred subsequent to the establishment of technological

feasibility. As a result, we do not capitalize any research and development costs relating to internally developed software to be sold, licensed or otherwise marketed.
Income taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes” (Topic 740). Deferred tax assets and liabilities arise from temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the Consolidated Financial Statements that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years. These temporary differences are measured using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce deferred tax assets to the extent that we consider it is more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will not be realized. In determining the valuation allowance, we consider factors such as the reversal of deferred income tax liabilities, projected taxable income, and the character of income tax assets and tax planning strategies. A change to these factors could impact the estimated valuation allowance and income tax expense.
We account for our uncertain tax provisions by using a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than not, based solely on the technical merits, that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the appropriate amount of the benefit to recognize. The amount of benefit to recognize is measured as the maximum amount which is more likely than not to be realized. The tax position is derecognized when it is no longer more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit. On subsequent recognition and measurement the maximum amount which is more likely than not to be recognized at each reporting date will represent the Company's best estimate, given the information available at the reporting date, although the outcome of the tax position is not absolute or final. We recognize both accrued interest and penalties related to liabilities for income taxes within the "Provision for Income Taxes"(recovery of) income taxes" line of our Consolidated Statements of Income (see note 14 "Income Taxes" for more details).
Fair value of financial instruments
Carrying amounts of certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable (trade and accrued liabilities) approximate their fair value due to the relatively short period of time between origination of the instruments and their expected realization.
The fair value of our total long-term debt approximates its carrying value since the interest rate is at market.
We apply the provisions of ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, to our derivative financial instruments that we are required to carry at fair value pursuant to other accounting standards (see note 15 "Fair Value Measurement" for more details).
Foreign currency
Our Consolidated Financial Statements are presented in U.S. dollars. In general, the functional currency of our subsidiaries is the local currency. For each subsidiary, assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S dollars at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet dates and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates prevailing during the previous month of the transaction. The effect of foreign currency translation adjustments not affecting net income are included in Shareholders' equity under the “Cumulative translation adjustment” account as a component of “Accumulated other comprehensive income”. Transactional foreign currency gains (losses) included in the Consolidated Statements of Income under the line item “Other income (expense), net” for Fiscal 2016,2019, Fiscal 20152018 and Fiscal 20142017 were $(1.9)$(4.3) million, $(31.0)$4.8 million and $4.0$3.1 million, respectively.

Restructuring charges
We record restructuring charges relating to contractual lease obligations and other exit costs in accordance with ASC Topic 420, “Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations” (Topic 420). Topic 420 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized and measured initially at its fair value in the period in which the liability is incurred. In order to incur a liability pursuant to Topic 420, our management must have established and approved a plan of restructuring in sufficient detail. A liability for a cost associated with involuntary termination benefits is recorded when benefits have been communicated and a liability for a cost to terminate an operating lease or other contract is incurred, when the contract has been terminated in accordance with the contract terms or we have ceased using the right conveyed by the contract, such as vacating a leased facility.
The recognition of restructuring charges requires us to make certain judgments regarding the nature, timing and amount associated with the planned restructuring activities, including estimating sub-lease income and the net recoverable amount of

equipment to be disposed of. At the end of each reporting period, we evaluate the appropriateness of the remaining accrued balances (see note 17 "Special Charges (Recoveries)" for more details).
LitigationLoss Contingencies
We are currently involved in various claims and legal proceedings. Quarterly, we review the status of each significant legal matter and evaluate such matters to determine how they should be treated for accounting and disclosure purposes in accordance with the requirements of ASC Topic 450-20 "Loss Contingencies" (Topic 450-20). Specifically, this evaluation process includes the centralized tracking and itemization of the status of all our disputes and litigation items, discussing the nature of any litigation and claim, including any dispute or claim that is reasonably likely to result in litigation, with relevant internal and external counsel, and assessing the progress of each matter in light of its merits and our experience with similar proceedings under similar circumstances.
If the potential loss from any claim or legal proceeding is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated, we accrue a liability for the estimated loss in accordance with Topic 450-20. As of the date of this filing on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2016,2019, we do not believe that the outcomes of any of these matters not already disclosed, individually or in the aggregate, will result in losses that are materially in excess of amounts already recognized (see note 13 "Guarantees and Contingencies" for more details).
Net income per share
Basic net income per share is computed using the weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding including contingently issuable shares where the contingency has been resolved. Diluted net income per share is computed using the weighted average number of Common Shares and stock equivalents outstanding using the treasury stock method during the year (see note 21 "Earnings Per Share" for more details).
Share-based payment
We measure share-based compensation costs, in accordance with ASC Topic 718, “Compensation - Stock Compensation” (Topic 718) on the grant date, based on the calculated fair value of the award. We have elected to treat awards with graded vesting as a single award when estimating fair value. Compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the employee requisite service period, which in our circumstances is the stated vesting period of the award, provided that total compensation cost recognized at least equals the pro ratapro-rata value of the award that has vested. Compensation cost is initially based on the estimated number of options for which the requisite service is expected to be rendered. This estimate is adjusted in the period once actual forfeitures are known (see note 12 "Share Capital, Option Plans and Share-based Payments" for more details).
Accounting for Pensions, post-retirement and post-employment benefits
Pension expense is accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic 715, “Compensation-Retirement Benefits” (Topic 715). Pension expense consists of: actuarially computed costs of pension benefits in respect of the current year of service, imputed returns on plan assets (for funded plans) and imputed interest on pension obligations. The expected costs of post retirement benefits, other than pensions, are accrued in the Consolidated Financial Statements based upon actuarial methods and assumptions. The over-funded or under-funded status of defined benefit pension and other post retirement plans are recognized as an asset or a liability (with the offset to “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income”other comprehensive income”, net of tax, within “Shareholders' equity”), respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets (see note 11 "Pension Plans and Other Post Retirement Benefits" for more details).
Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in Fiscal 2019
During Fiscal 2019, we adopted the following ASU's, in addition to those discussed in note 1 "Basis of Presentation". These ASU's did not have a material impact to our reported financial position, results of operations or cash flows:
ASU 2016-15 "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) - Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments". When classifying distributions received from equity method investees, the Company uses the cumulative earnings approach.
ASU 2017-01 "Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business"
ASU 2018-05 "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118"


Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
Retirement Benefits
In August 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU No. 2018-14 “Compensation-Retirement Benefits-Defined Benefit Plans - General (Topic 715-20): Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans” (ASU 2018-14), which modifies the disclosure requirements for defined benefit pension plans and other post retirement plans. ASU 2018-14 is effective for us in the first quarter of our fiscal year ending June 30, 2021. We are currently evaluating the impact of our pending adoption of ASU 2018-14 on our consolidated financial statements.
Implementation Costs in a Cloud Computing Arrangement
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-15 “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement that is a Service Contract” (ASU 2018-15). ASU 2018-15 clarifies the accounting treatment for implementation costs incurred as a customer in cloud computing arrangements. We will adopt ASU 2018-15 in the first quarter of our fiscal year ending June 30, 2020. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2018-15 will have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.
Financial Instruments
In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU)ASU No. 2016-13 “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (ASU 2016-13), which” and also issued subsequent amendments to the initial guidance under ASU 2018-19, ASU 2019-04 and ASU 2019-05 (collectively Topic 326). Topic 326 requires the measurement and recognition of expected credit losses for financial assets held. ASU 2016-13held at amortized cost. This replaces the existing incurred loss model with an expected loss model and requires the use of forward looking information to calculate credit loss estimates. Topic 326 is effective for us in our first quarter forof our fiscal year ending June 30, 2021 with earlier adoption permitted beginning in the first quarter of our fiscal year ending June 30, 2020. Topic 326 must be adopted by applying a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings. We are currently evaluating Topic 326, including its potential impact to our process and controls. We believe the impacteffect on our consolidated financial statements will largely depend on the composition and credit quality of our pending adoption of ASU 2016-13 on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01 “Financial Instruments - Overall (Topic 825): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (ASU 2016-01). This update requires that all equity investments be measured at fair value with changes in the fair value recognized through net income (other than those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee). This update also requires an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments. Additionally, this update eliminates the requirement to disclose the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost for entities that are not public business entities and eliminates the requirement to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet for public entities. ASU 2016-01 is effective for our fiscal year ending June 30, 2019. We are currently evaluating the impact of the pending adoption of ASU 2016-01 on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Share-based Compensation
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, "Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718)." This standard makes several modifications to Topic 718 related to the accounting for forfeitures, employer tax withholding on share-based compensationassets and the financial statement presentationeconomic conditions at the time of excess tax benefits or deficiencies. ASU 2016-09 also clarifies the statement of cash flows presentation for certain components of share-based awards. The standard is effective for us during the first quarter of our fiscal year ending June 30, 2018, with early adoption permitted. We are currently assessing how the adoption of this standard will impact our Consolidated Financial Statements.adoption.
Leases
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02 “Leases (Topic 842)” (ASU 2016-02), whichand issued subsequent amendments to the initial guidance under ASU 2017-13, ASU 2018-10, ASU 2018-11 and ASU 2018-20 (collectively, Topic 842). Topic 842 supersedes the guidance in former ASC Topic 840 “Leases”. TheTopic 842 requires companies to generally recognize on the balance sheet operating and financing lease liabilities and corresponding right-of-use (ROU) assets. For OpenText, the most significant change will result in the recognition of lease assets for the right to use the underlying asset and lease liabilities for the obligation to make lease payments by lessees, for those leases classified as operating leases under current guidance. Upon adoption, we expect to recognize ROU assets ranging from approximately $218 million to $228 million and lease liabilities ranging from approximately $255 million to $265 million. The new guidance will also require significant additional disclosures about the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows from leases. This standard is effective for us for our fiscal year ending June 30, 2020, with early adoption permitted. Upon adoption of ASU 2016-02, entities are required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. We believe adoption of this standard will have a significant impact on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Although we have not completed our assessment, we do not expect the adoption to change the recognition, measurement or presentation of lease expenses within the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Cash Flows.
Income Taxes - Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17 “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes” (ASU 2015-17). This update eliminates the current requirement to present deferred tax liabilities and assets as current and noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. Instead, under ASU 2015-17, entities will be required to classify all deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent. We have early adopted this standard in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2016 on a retrospective basis. Prior periods have been retrospectively adjusted. As a result of the adoption of ASU 2015-17, the following adjustments were made:

 Year Ended June 30, 2015
Reclassifications within Total Assets 
Decrease to current deferred tax assets$(30,711)
Increase to long-term deferred tax assets$26,176
Reclassifications within Total Liabilities 
Decrease to current deferred tax liabilities$997
Decrease to long-term deferred tax liabilities$3,538
Business Combinations - Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments
In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16 “Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments” (ASU 2015-16). This update amended Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 805 “Business Combinations” to simplify the presentation of adjustments to the initial purchase price allocation identified during the measurement period of a business combination. ASU 2015-16 requires that the acquirer record, in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization or their income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. An entity must present separately on the face of the income statement, or disclose in the notes, the portion of the amount recorded in current-period earnings by line item that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the provisional amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition date. ASU 2015-16 eliminates the requirement to retrospectively account for adjustments made to provisional amounts recognized in a business combination. During the third quarter of Fiscal 2016 we early adopted ASU 2015-16. The early adoption of ASU 2015-16 did not have an impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements for this period.
Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03 "Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs" (ASU 2015-03). This update amended the ASC Subtopic 835-30, "Interest - Imputation of Interest" to simplify the presentation of debt issuance costs by requiring that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this update.leases. We early adopted ASU 2015-03 in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2016 and reclassified $34.0 million and $30.6 million of debt issuance costs from Other assets to Long-term debt in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2016 and June 30, 2015, respectively.
Revenue Recognition
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers:will adopt Topic 606” (ASU 2014-09) and issued subsequent amendments to the initial guidance in August 2015, March 2016, April 2016 and May 2016 within ASU 2015-04, ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10 and ASU 2016-12, respectively. These updates supersede the revenue recognition requirements in ASC Topic 605, "Revenue Recognition" and nearly all other existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. The core principal of ASU 2014-09 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 identifies five steps to be followed to achieve this core principal, which include (i) identifying contract(s) with customers, (ii) identifying performance obligations in the contract(s), (iii) determining the transaction price, (iv) allocating the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract(s) and (v) recognizing revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. In August 2015, the FASB voted to defer the effective date of ASU 2014-09 for one year. The new guidance will now be effective for us842 in the first quarter of our fiscal year ending June 30, 2019. Early adoption, prior2020 using the modified retrospective transition and by applying the new standard to the original effective date, is not permitted. When applying ASU 2014-09 we can either apply the amendments: (i) retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented with the option to elect certain practical expedients as defined within ASU 2014-09 or (ii) retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying ASU 2014-09 recognizedall leases existing at the date of initial adoption and not restating comparative periods, as allowed for under Topic 842. Upon adoption, we will also elect the transition provisions of permitted practical expedients, which among other things, allows the carryforward of the historical lease classification. Furthermore, upon adoption, we will make an accounting policy election that will keep leases with an initial term of 12 months or less off our Consolidated Balance Sheets and we will recognize these short-term lease payments in the Consolidated Statements of Operations on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
NOTE 3—REVENUES
In accordance with Topic 606, we account for a customer contract when we obtain written approval, the contract is committed, the rights of the parties, including the payment terms, are identified, the contract has commercial substance and consideration is probable of collection. Revenue is recognized when, or as, control of a promised product or service is transferred to our customers in an amount that reflects the consideration we expect to be entitled to in exchange for our products and services (at its transaction price). Estimates of variable consideration and the determination of whether to include estimated amounts in the transaction price are based on readily available information, which may include historical, current and forecasted information, taking into consideration the type of customer, the type of transaction and specific facts and circumstances of each arrangement. We report revenue net of any revenue-based taxes assessed by governmental authorities that are imposed on and concurrent with specific revenue producing transactions.

We have four revenue streams: license, cloud services and subscriptions, customer support, and professional service and other.
License revenue
Our license revenue can be broadly categorized as perpetual licenses, term licenses and subscription licenses, all of which are deployed on the customer’s premises (on-premise).
Perpetual licenses: We sell perpetual licenses which provide customers the right to use software for an indefinite period of time in exchange for a one-time license fee, which is generally paid at contract inception. Our perpetual licenses provide a right to use intellectual property (IP) that is functional in nature and have significant stand-alone functionality. Accordingly, for perpetual licenses of functional IP, revenue is recognized at the point-in-time when control has been transferred to the customer, which normally occurs once software activation keys have been made available for download.
Term licenses and Subscription licenses: We sell both term and subscription licenses which provide customers the right to use software for a specified period in exchange for a fee, which may be paid at contract inception or paid in installments over the period of the contract. Like perpetual licenses, both our term licenses and subscription licenses are functional IP that have significant stand-alone functionality. Accordingly, for both term and subscription licenses, revenue is recognized at the point-in-time when the customer is able to use and benefit from the software, which is normally once software activation keys have been made available for download at the commencement of the term.
Cloud services and subscriptions revenue
Cloud services and subscriptions revenue are from hosting arrangements where in connection with the licensing of software, the end user doesn’t take possession of the software, as well as from end-to-end fully outsourced business-to-business (B2B) integration solutions to our customers (collectively referred to as cloud arrangements). The software application resides on our hardware or that of a third party, and the customer accesses and uses the software on an as-needed basis. Our cloud arrangements can be broadly categorized as "platform as a service" (PaaS), "software as a service" (SaaS), cloud subscriptions and managed services.
PaaS/ SaaS/ Cloud Subscriptions (collectively referred to here as cloud-based solutions): We offer cloud-based solutions that provide customers the right to access our software through the internet. Our cloud-based solutions represent a series of distinct services that are substantially the same and have the same pattern of transfer to the customer. These services are made available to the customer continuously throughout the contractual period, however, the extent to which the customer uses the services may vary at the customer’s discretion. The payment for cloud-based solutions may be received either at inception of the arrangement, or over the term of the arrangement.
These cloud-based solutions are considered to have a single performance obligation where the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefit, and as such we recognize revenue for these cloud-based solutions ratably over the term of the contractual agreement. For example, revenue related to cloud-based solutions that are provided on a usage basis, such as the number of users, is recognized based on a customer’s utilization of the services in a given period.
Additionally, a software license is present in a cloud-based solutions arrangement if all of the following criteria are met:
(i) The customer has the contractual right to take possession of the software at any time without significant penalty; and
(ii) It is feasible for the customer to host the software independent of us.
In these cases where a software license is present in a cloud-based solutions arrangement it is assessed to determine if it is distinct from the cloud-based solutions arrangement. The revenue allocated to the distinct software license would be recognized at the point in time the software license is transferred to the customer, whereas the revenue allocated to the hosting performance obligation would be recognized ratably on a monthly basis over the contractual term unless evidence suggests that revenue is earned, or obligations are fulfilled in a different pattern over the contractual term of the arrangement.
Managed services: We provide comprehensive B2B process outsourcing services for all day-to-day operations of a customers’ B2B integration program. Customers using these managed services are not permitted to take possession of our software and the contract is for a defined period, where customers pay a monthly or quarterly fee. Our performance obligation is satisfied as we provide services of operating and managing a customer's electronic data interchange (EDI) environment. Revenue relating to these services is recognized using an output method based on the expected level of service we will provide over the term of the contract.

In connection with cloud subscription and managed service contracts, we often agree to perform a variety of services before the customer goes live, such as for example, converting and migrating customer data, building interfaces and providing training. These services are considered an outsourced suite of professional services which can involve certain additional disclosuresproject-based activities. These services can be provided at the initiation of a contract, during the implementation or on an ongoing basis as definedpart of the customer life cycle. These services can be charged separately on a fixed fee or time and materials basis, or the costs associated may be recovered as part of the ongoing cloud subscription or managed services fee. These outsourced professional services are considered to be distinct from the ongoing hosting services and represent a separate performance obligation within ASU 2014-09. Weour cloud subscription or managed services arrangements. The obligation to provide outsourced professional services is satisfied over time, with the customer simultaneously receiving and consuming the benefits as we satisfy our performance obligations. For outsourced professional services, we recognize revenue by measuring progress toward the satisfaction of our performance obligation. Progress for services that are currently evaluatingcontracted for a fixed price is generally measured based on hours incurred as a portion of total estimated hours. As a practical expedient, when we invoice a customer at an amount that corresponds directly with the effectvalue to the customer of our performance to date, we recognize revenue at that amount.
Customer support revenue
Customer support revenue is associated with perpetual, term license and on-premise subscription arrangements. As customer support is not critical to the customer's ability to derive benefit from its right to use our software, customer support is considered as a distinct performance obligation when sold together in a bundled arrangement along with the software.
Customer support consists primarily of technical support and the provision of unspecified updates and upgrades on a when-and-if-available basis. Customer support for perpetual licenses is renewable, generally on an annual basis, at the option of the customer. Customer support for term and subscription licenses is renewable concurrently with such licenses for the same duration of time. Payments for customer support are generally made at the inception of the contract term or in installments over the term of the maintenance period. Our customer support team is ready to provide these maintenance services, as needed, to the customer during the contract term. As the elements of customer support are delivered concurrently and have the same pattern of transfer, customer support is accounted for as a single performance obligation. The customer benefits evenly throughout the contract period from the guarantee that the pending adoptioncustomer support resources and personnel will be available to them, and that any unspecified upgrades or unspecified future products developed by us will be made available. Revenue for customer support is recognized ratably over the contract period based on the start and end dates of the maintenance term, in line with how we believe services are provided.
Professional service and other revenue
Our professional services, when offered along with software licenses, consists primarily of technical services and training services. Technical services may include installation, customization, implementation or consulting services. Training services may include access to online modules or delivering a training package customized to the customer’s needs. At the customer’s discretion, we may offer one, all, or a mix of these services. Payment for professional services is generally a fixed fee or is a fee based on time and materials.
Professional services can be arranged in the same contract as the software license or in a separate contract.
As our professional services do not significantly change the functionality of the license and our customers can benefit from our professional services on their own or together with other readily available resources, we consider professional services as distinct within the context of the contract.
Professional service revenue is recognized over time so long as: (i) the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits as we perform them, (ii) our performance creates or enhances an asset the customer controls as we perform, and (iii) our performance does not create an asset with alternative use and we have enforceable right to payment.
If all of the above mentioned ASUscriteria are met, we use an input-based measure of progress for recognizing professional service revenue. For example we may consider total labor hours incurred compared to total expected labor hours. As a practical expedient, when we invoice a customer at an amount that corresponds directly with the value to the customer of our performance to date, we will recognize revenue at that amount.

Material rights
To the extent that we grant our customer an option to acquire additional products or services in one of our arrangements, we will account for the option as a distinct performance obligation in the contract only if the option provides a material right to the customer that the customer would not receive without entering into the contract. For example if we give the customer an option to acquire additional goods or services in the future at a price that is significantly lower than the current price, this would be a material right as it allows the customer to, in effect, pay in advance for the option to purchase future products or services. If a material right exists in one of our contracts then revenue allocated to the option is deferred and we would recognize revenue only when those future products or services are transferred or when the option expires.
Based on history, our contracts do not typically contain material rights and when they do, the material right is not significant to our consolidated financial statements.
Arrangements with multiple performance obligations
Our contracts generally contain more than one of the products and services listed above. Determining whether goods and services are considered distinct performance obligations that should be accounted for separately or as a single performance obligation may require judgment, specifically when assessing whether both of the following two criteria are met:
the customer can benefit from the product or service either on its own or together with other resources that are readily available to the customer; and
our promise to transfer the product or service to the customer is separately identifiable from other promises in the contract.
If these criteria are not met, we determine an appropriate measure of progress based on the nature of our overall promise for the single performance obligation.
If these criteria are met, each product or service is separately accounted for as a distinct performance obligation and the total transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation on a relative standalone selling price (SSP) basis.
Standalone selling price
The SSP reflects the price we would charge for a specific product or service if it was sold separately in similar circumstances and to similar customers. In most cases we are able to establish the SSP based on observable data. We typically establish a narrow SSP range for our products and services and assess this range on a periodic basis or when material changes in facts and circumstances warrant a review.
If the SSP is not directly observable, then we estimate the amount using either the expected cost plus a margin or residual approach. Estimating SSP requires judgment that could impact the amount and timing of revenue recognized. SSP is a formal process whereby management considers multiple factors including, but not limited to, geographic or regional specific factors, competitive positioning, internal costs, profit objectives, and pricing practices.
Transaction Price Allocation
In bundled arrangements, where we have more than one distinct performance obligation, we must allocate the transaction price to each performance obligation based on its relative SSP. However, in certain bundled arrangements, the SSP may not always be directly observable. For instance, in bundled arrangements with license and customer support, we allocate the transaction price between the license and customer support performance obligations using the residual approach because we have determined that the SSP for licenses in these arrangements are highly variable. We use the residual approach only for our Consolidated Financial Statementslicense arrangements. When the SSP is observable but contractual pricing does not fall within our established SSP range, then an adjustment is required and we will allocate the transaction price between license and customer support at a constant ratio reflecting the mid-point of the established SSP range.
When two or more contracts are entered into at or near the same time with the same customer, we evaluate the facts and circumstances associated with the negotiation of those contracts. Where the contracts are negotiated as a package, we will account for them as a single arrangement and allocate the consideration for the combined contracts among the performance obligations accordingly.
Sales to resellers
We execute certain sales contracts through resellers, distributors and channel partners (collectively referred to as resellers). For these type of agreements, we assess whether we are considered the principal or the agent in the arrangement. We consider factors such as, but not limited to, whether or not the reseller has the ability to set the price for which they sell our software products to end users and whether or not resellers distribution rights are limited such that any potential sales are subject to OpenText’s review and approval before delivery of the software product can be made. If we determine that we are the

principal in the arrangement, then revenue is recognized based on the transaction price for the sale of the software product to the end user at the gross amount. If that is not known, then the net amount received from the reseller is the transaction price. If we determine that we are the agent in the agreement, then revenue is recognized based on the transaction price for the sale of the software product to the reseller, less any applicable commissions paid or discounts or rebates, if offered. Costs or commissions paid to the reseller would be recognized as a reduction of revenue unless we received a distinct good or service in return. Similarly, any discounts or rebates offered by the reseller would be recognized as a reduction of revenue.
Typically, we conclude that we are the principal in our reseller agreements, as we have control over the service and products prior to being transferred to the end customer.
We also assess the creditworthiness of each reseller and if they are newly formed, undercapitalized or in financial difficulty, we defer any revenues expected to emanate from such reseller and recognize revenue only when cash is received, and all other revenue recognition criteria under Topic 606 are met.
Rights of return and other incentives
We do not generally offer rights of return or any other incentives such as concessions, product rotation, or price protection and, therefore, do not provide for or make estimates of rights of return and similar incentives. In some contracts, however, discounts may be offered to the customer for future software purchases and other additional products or services. Such arrangements grant the customer an option to acquire additional goods or services in the future at a discount and therefore are evaluated under guidance related disclosures. Although it isto “material rights” as discussed above.
Other policies
Payment terms and conditions vary by contract type, although terms generally include a requirement of payment within 30 to 60 days of the invoice date. In certain arrangements, we will receive payment from a customer either before or after the performance obligation to which the invoice relates has been satisfied. As a practical expedient, we do not account for significant financing components if the period between when we transfer the promised good or service to the customer and when the customer pays for the product or service will be one year or less. On that basis, our contracts for license and maintenance typically do not contain a significant financing component, however in determining the transaction price we consider whether we need to adjust the promised consideration for the effects of the time value of money if the timing of payments provides either the customer or OpenText with a significant benefit of financing. Our managed services contracts may not include an upfront charge for outsourced professional services performed as part of an implementation and are recovered through an ongoing fee. Therefore, these contracts may be expected to have a financing component associated with revenue being recognized in advance of billings.
We may modify contracts to offer customers additional products or services. The additional products and services will be considered distinct from those products or services transferred to the customer before the modification and will be accounted for as a separate contract. We evaluate whether the price for the additional products and services reflects the SSP adjusted as appropriate for facts and circumstances applicable to that contract. In determining whether an adjustment is appropriate, we evaluate whether the incremental consideration is consistent with the prices previously paid by the customer or similar customers.
Performance Obligations
A summary of our typical performance obligations and when the obligations are satisfied are as follows:

Performance ObligationWhen Performance Obligation is Typically Satisfied
License revenue:
Software licenses (Perpetual,Term, Subscription)When software activation keys have been made available for download (point in time)
Cloud services and subscriptions revenue:
Outsourced Professional ServicesAs the services are provided (over time)
Managed Services / Ongoing HostingOver the contract term, beginning on the date that service is made available (i.e. "Go live") to the customer (over time)
Customer support revenue:
When and if available updates and upgrades and technical supportRatable over the course of the service term (over time)
Professional service and other revenue:
Professional servicesAs the services are provided (over time)


Disaggregation of Revenue
The following table disaggregates our revenue by significant impactgeographic area, based on the location of our end customer, and by type of performance obligation and timing of revenue recognition for the periods indicated:
 Year Ended June 30, 2019
Total Revenues by Geography: 
Americas (1)
$1,683,282
EMEA (2)
920,422
Asia Pacific (3)
265,051
Total Revenues$2,868,755
  
Total Revenues by Type of Performance Obligation: 
Recurring revenue (4)
 
    Cloud services and subscriptions revenue
$907,812
    Customer support revenue
1,247,915
Total recurring revenues$2,155,727
License revenue (perpetual, term and subscriptions)428,092
Professional service and other revenue284,936
Total revenues$2,868,755
  
Total Revenues by Timing of Revenue Recognition 
Point in time428,092
Over time (including professional service and other revenue)2,440,663
Total revenues$2,868,755
(1) Americas consists of countries in North, Central and South America.
(2) EMEA primarily consists of countries in Europe, the Middle East and Africa.
(3) Asia Pacific primarily consists of the countries Japan, Australia, China, Korea, Philippines, Singapore and New Zealand.
(4) Recurring revenue is defined as the sum of cloud services and subscriptions revenue and customer support revenue.

Contract Balances
A contract asset will be recorded if we have recognized revenue but do not have an unconditional right to the related consideration from the customer. For example, this will be the case if implementation services offered in a cloud arrangement are identified as a separate performance obligation and are provided to a customer prior to us being able to bill the customer. In addition, a contract asset may arise in relation to subscription licenses if the license revenue that is recognized upfront exceeds the amount that we are able to invoice the customer at that time. Contract assets are reclassified to accounts receivable when the rights become unconditional.
The balance for our contract assets and contract liabilities (i.e. deferred revenues) for the periods indicated below were as follows:
 As of June 30, 2019 As of July 1, 2018
Short-term contract assets$20,956
 $5,474
Long-term contract assets$15,386
 $12,382
Short-term deferred revenue$641,656
 $618,197
Long-term deferred revenue$46,974
 $64,743


The difference in the opening and closing balances of our contract assets and deferred revenues primarily results from the timing difference between our performance and the customer’s payments. We fulfill our obligations under a contract with a customer by transferring products and services in exchange for consideration from the customer. During the year ended June 30, 2019, we reclassified $19.2 million of contract assets to receivables as a result of the right to the transaction consideration becoming unconditional. During the year ended June 30, 2019, there was no significant impairment loss recognized related to contract assets.

We recognize deferred revenue when we have received consideration or an amount of consideration is due from the customer for future obligations to transfer products or services. Our deferred revenues primarily relate to customer support agreements which have been paid for by customers prior to the performance of those services. The amount of revenue that was recognized during the year ended June 30, 2019 that was included in the deferred revenue balances at July 1, 2018 was approximately $617 million.
Incremental Costs of Obtaining a Contract with a Customer
Incremental costs of obtaining a contract include only those costs that we incur to obtain a contract that we would not have incurred if the contract had not been obtained, such as sales commissions. We have determined that certain of our commission programs meet the requirements to be capitalized. Some commission programs are not subject to capitalization as the commission expense is paid and recognized as the related revenue is recognized. In assessing costs to obtain a contract, we apply a practical expedient that allows us to assess our incremental costs on a portfolio of contracts with similar characteristics instead of assessing the incremental costs on each individual contract. We do not expect the financial statement effects of applying this practical expedient to the portfolio of contracts to be materially different than if we were to apply the new standard to each individual contract.
We pay commissions on the sale of new customer contracts as well as for renewals of existing contracts to the extent the renewals generate incremental revenue. Commissions paid on renewal contracts are limited to the incremental new revenue and therefore these payments are not commensurate with the commission paid on the original sale. We allocate commission costs to the performance obligations in an arrangement consistent with the allocation of the transaction price. Commissions allocated to the license performance obligation are expensed at the time the license revenue is recognized. Commissions allocated to professional service performance obligations are expensed as incurred, as these contracts are generally for one year or less and we apply a practical expedient to expense costs as incurred if the amortization period would have been one year or less. Commissions allocated to maintenance, managed services, on-going hosting arrangements or other recurring services, are capitalized and amortized consistent with the pattern of transfer to the customer of the services over the period expected to benefit from the commission payment. As commissions paid on renewals are not commensurate with the original sale, the period of benefit considers anticipated renewals. The benefit period is estimated to be approximately six years which is based on our customer contracts and the estimated life of our technology.
Expenses for incremental costs associated with obtaining a contract are recorded within sales and marketing expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Our short term capitalized costs to obtain a contract are included in "Prepaid expenses and other assets", while our long-term capitalized costs to obtain a contract are included in "Other assets" on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The following table summarizes the changes since July 1, 2018:
Capitalized costs to obtain a contract as of July 1, 2018$35,151
New capitalized costs incurred24,347
Amortization of capitalized costs(11,003)
Adjustments on account of foreign exchange(211)
Capitalized costs to obtain a contract as of June 30, 2019$48,284


During the year ended June 30, 2019 there was no significant impairment loss recognized in relation to costs capitalized.
Transaction Price Allocated to the Remaining Performance Obligations
As of June 30, 2019, approximately $1.1 billion of revenue is expected to be recognized from remaining performance obligations on existing contracts. We expect to recognize approximately 40% over the next 12 months and the remaining balance thereafter. We apply the practical expedient and do not disclose performance obligations that have original expected durations of one year or less.
Impact on financial statements
The following tables summarize the impacts of adopting Topic 606 on our consolidated balance sheets, statements of income and cash flows, all as compared to proforma balances illustrating if ASC Topic 605 "Revenue Recognition" (Topic 605) had still been in effect. Financial statement line items that were not impacted by the adoption of Topic 606 have been excluded from the tables below.


Consolidated Balance Sheet
 As of June 30, 2019
 As reported under
Topic 606
 Adjustments Proforma as if Topic 605 was in effect
ASSETS     
Contract assets$20,956
 $(20,956) $
Prepaid expenses and other current assets97,238
 4,428
 101,666
Total current assets1,561,328
 (16,528) 1,544,800
Long-term contract assets15,386
 (15,386) 
Deferred tax assets1,004,450
 16,631
 1,021,081
Other assets148,977
 (5,614) 143,363
Total assets$7,933,975
 $(20,897) $7,913,078
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY    

Current liabilities:    

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities$329,903
 $(55) $329,848
Deferred revenues641,656
 24,635
 666,291
Total current liabilities1,014,717
 24,580
 1,039,297
Long-term liabilities:    

Deferred revenues46,974
 32,170
 79,144
Deferred tax liabilities55,872
 (8,178) 47,694
Total long-term liabilities3,034,588
 23,992
 3,058,580
Shareholders’ equity:    

Accumulated other comprehensive income24,124
 1,260
 25,384
Retained earnings2,113,883
 (70,729) 2,043,154
Total OpenText shareholders' equity3,883,455
 (69,469) 3,813,986
Non-controlling interests1,215
 
 1,215
Total shareholders’ equity3,884,670
 (69,469) 3,815,201
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$7,933,975
 $(20,897) $7,913,078


Consolidated Statements of Income
 Year Ended June 30, 2019
 As reported under
Topic 606
 Adjustments Proforma as if Topic 605 was in effect
Revenues:     
License$428,092
 $(37,709) $390,383
Cloud services and subscriptions907,812
 (6,361) 901,451
Customer support1,247,915
 (1,605) 1,246,310
Professional service and other284,936
 24
 284,960
Total revenues2,868,755
 (45,651) 2,823,104
Cost of revenues:     
Cloud services and subscriptions383,993
 (338) 383,655
Professional service and other224,635
 5
 224,640
Total cost of revenues930,703
 (333) 930,370
Gross profit1,938,052
 (45,318) 1,892,734
Operating expenses:     
Sales and marketing518,035
 8,945
 526,980
Total operating expenses1,371,042
 8,945
 1,379,987
Income from operations567,010
 (54,263) 512,747
Interest and other related expense, net(136,592) (801) (137,393)
Income before income taxes440,574
 (55,064) 385,510
Provision for (recovery of) income taxes154,937
 (14,121) 140,816
Net income for the period$285,637
 $(40,943) $244,694
The adjustment on license revenue for the year ended June 30, 2019 of $37.7 million is primarily due to new contracts entered into during Fiscal 2019 for which a timing difference of revenue recognition policiesexists between Topic 606 and disclosures, weTopic 605. See above for an explanation of how license revenues are recognized under Topic 606. The Fiscal 2019 contracts pertaining to the respective adjustments are recognized up front under Topic 606, whereas such revenues would have not yet selected a transition method nor have we determined the effectbeen recognized over time under Topic 605.

Consolidated Statement of the standard on our ongoing financial reporting.Cash Flows
 Year Ended June 30, 2019
 
As reported under
Topic 606
 Adjustments Proforma as if Topic 605 was in effect
Cash flows from operating activities:     
Net income for the period$285,637
 $(40,943) $244,694
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Deferred taxes47,425
 (14,165) 33,260
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:     
Accounts receivable75,508
 (18,883) 56,625
Contract assets(37,623) 37,623
 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets(819) 3,319
 2,500
Income taxes and deferred charges and credits27,291
 101
 27,392
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities(21,732) 173
 (21,559)
Deferred revenue(1,827) 26,841
 25,014
Other assets(4) 5,934
 5,930
Net cash provided by operating activities$876,278
 $
 $876,278





NOTE 3—4—ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
Balance as of June 30, 2016$6,740
Bad debt expense5,929
Write-off /adjustments(6,350)
Balance as of June 30, 20176,319
Bad debt expense9,942
Write-off /adjustments(6,520)
Balance as of June 30, 20189,741
Bad debt expense13,461
Write-off /adjustments(6,191)
Balance as of June 30, 2019$17,011
Balance as of June 30, 2013$4,871
Bad debt expense3,081
Write-off /adjustments(3,225)
Balance as of June 30, 20144,727
Bad debt expense5,346
Write-off /adjustments(4,086)
Balance as of June 30, 20155,987
Bad debt expense5,908
Write-off /adjustments(5,155)
Balance as of June 30, 2016$6,740

Included in accounts receivable are unbilled receivables in the amount of $35.6$56.1 million as of June 30, 20162019 (June 30, 2015—2018—$26.755.5 million).
NOTE 4—5—PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
As of June 30, 2016As of June 30, 2019
Cost 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 NetCost 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 Net
Furniture and fixtures$20,462
 $(12,505) $7,957
$40,260
 $(26,492) $13,768
Office equipment823
 (226) 597
1,993
 (1,576) 417
Computer hardware134,688
 (89,351) 45,337
258,802
 (177,402) 81,400
Computer software51,991
 (25,134) 26,857
119,018
 (87,240) 31,778
Capitalized software development costs53,540
 (16,830) 36,710
95,729
 (56,205) 39,524
Leasehold improvements57,061
 (30,743) 26,318
113,510
 (66,520) 46,990
Land and buildings48,529
 (8,645) 39,884
49,557
 (13,981) 35,576
Total$367,094
 $(183,434) $183,660
$678,869
 $(429,416) $249,453


 As of June 30, 2018
 Cost 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 Net
Furniture and fixtures$34,647
 $(21,488) $13,159
Office equipment1,467
 (687) 780
Computer hardware207,381
 (134,906) 72,475
Computer software97,653
 (59,485) 38,168
Capitalized software development costs81,073
 (41,556) 39,517
Leasehold improvements118,200
 (55,172) 63,028
Land and buildings47,880
 (10,802) 37,078
Total$588,301
 $(324,096) $264,205

 As of June 30, 2015
 Cost 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 Net
Furniture and fixtures$17,571
 $(11,334) $6,237
Office equipment1,532
 (879) 653
Computer hardware110,076
 (72,479) 37,597
Computer software37,981
 (17,525) 20,456
Capitalized software development costs38,576
 (7,353) 31,223
Leasehold improvements53,391
 (29,458) 23,933
Land and buildings47,525
 (7,205) 40,320
Total$306,652
 $(146,233) $160,419


NOTE 5—6—GOODWILL
Goodwill is recorded when the consideration paid for an acquisition of a business exceeds the fair value of identifiable net tangible and intangible assets. The following table summarizes the changes in goodwill since June 30, 2014:2017:
Balance as at June 30, 2017$3,416,749
Acquisition of Hightail (note 18)7,293
Acquisition of Guidance (note 18)129,800
Acquisition of Covisint (note 18)26,905
Adjustments relating to acquisitions prior to Fiscal 2018 that had open measurement periods (note 18)(1,458)
Adjustments on account of foreign exchange840
Balance as of June 30, 20183,580,129
Acquisition of Catalyst Repository Systems Inc. (note 18)30,973
Acquisition of Liaison Technologies, Inc. (note 18)163,592
Adjustments on account of foreign exchange(4,786)
Balance as of June 30, 2019$3,769,908
Balance as of June 30, 2014$1,940,082
Acquisition of Informative Graphics Corporation (note 18)23,936
Acquisition of Actuate Corporation (note 18)197,352
Adjustments relating to prior acquisitions222
Balance as of June 30, 20152,161,592
Acquisition of Daegis Inc. (note 18)8,045
Acquisition of CEM Business (note 18)90,712
Acquisition of ANXe Business Corporation (note 18)65,237
Balance as of June 30, 2016$2,325,586


NOTE 6—7—ACQUIRED INTANGIBLE ASSETS
 As of June 30, 2019
 Cost Accumulated Amortization Net
Technology assets$835,498
 $(349,259) $486,239
Customer assets1,397,937
 (737,672) 660,265
Total$2,233,435
 $(1,086,931) $1,146,504
      
 As of June 30, 2018
 Cost Accumulated Amortization Net
Technology assets$985,226
 $(439,774) $545,452
Customer assets1,348,510
 (597,325) 751,185
Total$2,333,736
 $(1,037,099) $1,296,637

 As of June 30, 2016
 Cost Accumulated Amortization Net
Technology Assets$359,573
 $(155,848) $203,725
Customer Assets790,506
 (347,991) 442,515
Total$1,150,079
 $(503,839) $646,240
      
 As of June 30, 2015
 Cost Accumulated Amortization Net
Technology Assets$428,724
 $(210,862) $217,862
Customer Assets716,525
 (254,908) 461,617
Total$1,145,249
 $(465,770) $679,479
TheWhere applicable, the above balances as of June 30, 20162019 have been reduced to reflect the impact of intangible assets relating to acquisitions where the gross cost has become fully amortized during the year ended June 30, 2016.2019. The impact of this resulted in a reduction of $129.3$49.5 million related to Customer assets and $273.9 million related to Technology Assets and $20.1 million related to Customer Assets.assets.
The weighted average amortization periods for acquired technology and customer intangible assets are approximately fivesix years and seveneight years, respectively.
The following table shows the estimated future amortization expense for the fiscal years indicated. This calculation assumes no future adjustments to acquired intangible assets:
 
Fiscal years ending
June 30,
2017$191,523
2018178,804
2019151,405
202079,891
202111,575
2022 and beyond33,042
Total$646,240
Fiscal years ending June 30, 
2020$322,009
2021230,648
2022211,093
2023144,128
202495,876
2025 and beyond142,750
Total$1,146,504


NOTE 7—8—OTHER ASSETS
 As of June 30, 2019 As of June 30, 2018
Deposits and restricted cash$13,671
 $9,479
Deferred implementation costs
 13,740
Capitalized costs to obtain a contract35,593
 13,027
Investments67,002
 49,635
Long-term prepaid expenses and other long-term assets32,711
 25,386
Total$148,977
 $111,267
 As of June 30, 2016 As of June 30, 2015
Deposits and restricted cash$10,715
 $12,137
Deferred implementation costs18,116
 13,736
Cost basis investments18,062
 11,386
Marketable securities
 9,108
Long-term prepaid expenses and other long-term assets6,804
 8,579
Total$53,697
 $54,946

Deposits and restricted cash primarily relate to security deposits provided to landlords in accordance with facility lease agreements and cash restricted per the terms of certain contractual-based agreements.
Deferred implementation costs relate to deferred direct and relevant costs on implementation of long-term contracts, to the extent such costs can be recovered through guaranteed contract revenues.
Cost basis investments As a result of the adoption of Topic 606, deferred implementation costs are no longer capitalized, but rather expensed as incurred as these costs do not relate to investmentsfuture performance obligations. Accordingly, these costs were adjusted through opening retained earnings as of July 1, 2018 (see note 3 "Revenues").
Capitalized costs to obtain a contract relate to incremental costs of obtaining a contract, such as sales commissions, which are eligible for capitalization on contracts to the extent that such costs are expected to be recovered (see note 3 "Revenues").
Investments relate to certain non-marketable equity securities in which the Company holds less than a 20% interest, iswe are a limited partner and does not exert significant influence over operationalpartner. Our interests in each of these investees range from 4% to below 20%. These investments are accounted for using the equity method. Our share of net income or investment decisions.
Marketable securities are classified as available for sale securities and are recordedlosses based on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value with unrealized gains or losses reportedinterest in these investments is recorded as a separate component of Accumulated Other Comprehensiveother income (expense), net in our Consolidated Statements of Income. As ofDuring the year ended June 30, 2016, all2019, our share of our marketable securities are recorded as short-term investments.income (loss) from these investments was $13.7 million (year ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 — $6.0 million and $6.0 million, respectively).
Long-term prepaid expenses and other long-term assets primarily relate toincludes advance payments on long-term licenses that are being amortized over the applicable terms of the licenses.
NOTE 8—DEFERRED CHARGES AND CREDITS
Deferred chargeslicenses and credits relate to cash taxes payable and the elimination of deferred tax balances relating to legal entity consolidations completed as part of internal reorganizations of our international subsidiaries. Deferred charges and credits are amortized to income tax expense over a period of 6 to 15 years.other miscellaneous assets.
NOTE 9—ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities are comprised of the following:
 As of June 30, 2019 As of June 30, 2018
Accounts payable—trade$46,323
 $41,722
Accrued salaries and commissions131,430
 118,024
Accrued liabilities117,551
 108,903
Accrued interest on Senior Notes24,786
 24,786
Amounts payable in respect of restructuring and other Special charges8,153
 5,622
Asset retirement obligations1,660
 3,097
Total$329,903
 $302,154

 As of June 30, 2016 As of June 30, 2015
Accounts payable—trade*$35,804
 $15,558
Accrued salaries and commissions77,813
 83,888
Accrued liabilities113,272
 107,870
Accrued interest on Senior Notes23,562
 20,625
Amounts payable in respect of restructuring and other Special charges5,109
 12,065
Asset retirement obligations1,890
 1,364
Total$257,450
 $241,370
*Accounts payable - trade has increased primarily as a result of an active working capital management program.
Long-term accrued liabilities
 As of June 30, 2019 As of June 30, 2018
Amounts payable in respect of restructuring and other Special charges$4,804
 $4,362
Other accrued liabilities*30,338
 35,874
Asset retirement obligations14,299
 12,591
Total$49,441
 $52,827
 As of June 30, 2016 As of June 30, 2015
Amounts payable in respect of restructuring and other Special charges$3,986
 $2,034
Other accrued liabilities*19,138
 24,826
Asset retirement obligations6,724
 7,822
Total$29,848
 $34,682

* Other accrued liabilities consist primarily of tenant allowances, deferred rent and lease fair value adjustments relating to certain facilities acquired through business acquisitions.

Asset retirement obligations
We are required to return certain of our leased facilities to their original state at the conclusion of our lease. As of June 30, 2016,2019, the present value of this obligation was $8.6$16.0 million (June 30, 2015—2018—$9.215.7 million), with an undiscounted value of $9.2$17.6 million (June 30, 2015—2018—$9.817.7 million).
NOTE 10—LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt
Long-term debt is comprised of the following:
 As of June 30, 2019 As of June 30, 2018
Total debt   
Senior Notes 2026$850,000
 $850,000
Senior Notes 2023800,000
 800,000
Term Loan B987,500
 997,500
Total principal payments due2,637,500
 2,647,500
    
Premium on Senior Notes 20265,405
 6,018
Debt issuance costs(28,027) (32,995)
Total amount outstanding2,614,878
 2,620,523
    
Less:   
Current portion of long-term debt   
Term Loan B10,000
 10,000
Total current portion of long-term debt10,000
 10,000
    
Non-current portion of long-term debt$2,604,878
 $2,610,523
 As of June 30, 2016 As of June 30, 2015
Total debt   
Senior Notes 2026$600,000
 $
Senior Notes 2023800,000
 800,000
Term Loan B780,000
 788,000
Total principal payments due2,180,000
 1,588,000
Less:   
Debt issuance costs(34,013) (30,630)
Total amount outstanding2,145,987
 1,557,370
    
Less:   
Current portion of long-term debt   
Term Loan B8,000
 8,000
 

 

Non-current portion of long-term debt$2,137,987
 $1,549,370

Senior Unsecured Fixed Rate Notes
Senior Notes 2026
On May 31, 2016, we issued $600 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.875% Senior Notes due 2026 (Senior Notes 2026) in an unregistered offering to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (Securities Act), and to certain persons in offshore transactions pursuant to Regulation S under the Securities Act. Senior Notes 2026 bear interest at a rate of 5.875% per annum, payable semi-annually in arrears on June 1 and December 1, commencing on December 1, 2016. Senior Notes 2026 will mature on June 1, 2026, unless earlier redeemed, in accordance with their terms, or repurchased.
On December 20, 2016, we issued an additional $250 million in aggregate principal amount by reopening our Senior Notes 2026 at an issue price of 102.75%. The additional notes have identical terms, are fungible with and are a part of a single series with the previously issued $600 million aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes 2026. The outstanding aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes 2026, after taking into consideration the additional issuance, is $850 million.
For the year ended June 30, 2016,2019, we recorded interest expense of $2.9$49.9 million relating to Senior Notes 2026.2026 (year ended June 30, 2018 and 2017—$49.9 million and $43.1 million, respectively).
Senior Notes 2023
On January 15, 2015, we issued $800 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.625% Senior Notes due 2023 (Senior Notes 2023) in an unregistered offering to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act, and to certain persons in offshore transactions pursuant to Regulation S under the Securities Act. Senior Notes 2023 bear interest at a rate of 5.625% per annum, payable semi-annually in arrears on January 15 and July 15, commencing on July 15, 2015. Senior Notes 2023 will mature on January 15, 2023, unless earlier redeemed, in accordance with their terms, or repurchased.

For the year ended June 30, 2016,2019, we recorded interest expense of $45.0 million relating to Senior Notes 2023 (year ended June 30, 2015—2018 and 2017—$20.6 million)45.0 million, respectively).
Term Loan B
In connection with the acquisition of GXS Group, Inc. (GXS), on January 16, 2014,On May 30, 2018, we enteredrefinanced our existing term loan facility, by entering into a creditnew $1 billion term loan facility which provides for a(Term Loan B), whereby we borrowed $1 billion on that day and repaid in full the loans under our prior $800 million term loan facility (Term Loan B).
originally entered into on January 16, 2014. Borrowings under Term Loan B are secured by a first charge over substantially all of our assets on a pari passu basis with the Revolver (defined below). We entered into Term Loan B and borrowed the full amount on January 16, 2014.

Term Loan B has a seven year term, maturing in May 2025, and repayments made under Term Loan B are equal to 0.25% of the original principal amount in equal quarterly installments for the life of Term Loan B, with the remainder due at maturity. Borrowings under Term Loan B currently bear a floating rate of interest at a rate per annum equal to 2.5%1.75% plus LIBOR. As of June 30, 2019, the higheroutstanding balance on the Term Loan B bears an interest rate of LIBOR or 0.75%approximately 4.19%.
For the year ended June 30, 2016,2019, we recorded interest expense of $25.9$41.1 million, respectively, relating to Term Loan B (year ended June 30, 2015—2018 and 2017—$26.1 million; June 30, 2014—$11.9 million)27.9 million and $24.8 million, respectively).
Revolver
We currently have a $300$450 million committed revolving credit facility (the Revolver). with a maturity date of May 5, 2022. Borrowings under the Revolver are secured by a first charge over substantially all of our assets, and on a pari passu basis with Term Loan B. The Revolver will mature on December 22, 2019 withhas no fixed repayment date prior to the end of the term. Borrowings under the Revolver bear interest per annum at a floating rate of LIBOR plus a fixed margin dependent on our consolidated net leverage ratio ranging from 1.25% to 1.75%.
As of June 30, 2016,2019, we have not drawn any amountsno outstanding balance on the Revolver. There was no activity during the year ended June 30, 2019 and we recorded no interest expense.
During the year ended June 30, 2018, we drew down $200 million from the Revolver, partially to finance acquisitions (year ended June 30, 2017—$225 million). Additionally, during the year ended June 30, 2018, we repaid $375 million and recorded interest expense of $9.0 million relating to amounts drawn on the Revolver (year ended June 30, 2017—$50 million and $2.6 million, respectively).
Debt Issuance Costs and Premium on Senior Notes
Debt issuance costs relate primarily to costs incurred for the purpose of obtaining our credit facilities and issuing our Senior Notes 2023 and Senior Notes 2026 (collectively referred to as the Senior Notes) and are being amortized over the respective terms of the Senior Notes and Term Loan B and the Revolver using the effective interest method.
The premium on Senior Notes 2026 represents the excess of the proceeds received over the face value of Senior Notes 2026. This premium is amortized as a reduction to interest expense over the term of Senior Notes 2026 using the effective interest method.
NOTE 11—PENSION PLANS AND OTHER POST RETIREMENT BENEFITS
The following table provides details of our defined benefit pension plans and long-term employee benefit obligations for Open Text Document Technologies GmbH (CDT), GXS GmbH (GXS GER) and, GXS Philippines, Inc. (GXS PHP) and other plans as of June 30, 20162019 and June 30, 2015:2018:
As of June 30, 2016As of June 30, 2019
Total benefit
obligation
 
Current portion of
benefit obligation*
 
Non-current portion of
benefit obligation
Total benefit
obligation
 
Current portion of
benefit obligation*
 
Non-current portion of
benefit obligation
CDT defined benefit plan$29,450
 $589
 $28,861
$35,836
 $675
 $35,161
GXS Germany defined benefit plan24,729
 772
 23,957
GXS Philippines defined benefit plan7,341
 30
 7,311
GXS GER defined benefit plan26,739
 1,012
 25,727
GXS PHP defined benefit plan6,904
 124
 6,780
Other plans3,330
 1,466
 1,864
8,052
 481
 7,571
Total$64,850
 $2,857
 $61,993
$77,531
 $2,292
 $75,239
 

As of June 30, 2015As of June 30, 2018
Total benefit
obligation
 
Current portion of
benefit obligation*
 
Non-current portion of
benefit obligation
Total benefit
obligation
 
Current portion of
benefit obligation*
 
Non-current portion of
benefit obligation
CDT defined benefit plan$26,091
 $575
 $25,516
$32,651
 $655
 $31,996
GXS Germany defined benefit plan22,420
 774
 21,646
GXS Philippines defined benefit plan7,025
 26
 6,999
GXS GER defined benefit plan25,382
 1,027
 24,355
GXS PHP defined benefit plan3,853
 138
 3,715
Other plans2,751
 175
 2,576
6,095
 442
 5,653
Total$58,287
 $1,550
 $56,737
$67,981
 $2,262
 $65,719

*The current portion of the benefit obligation has been included within "Accrued salaries and commissions", all within "Accounts payable and accrued liabilities" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets (see Note 9)note 9 "Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities").
Defined Benefit Plans
CDT Plan
CDT sponsors an unfunded defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all CDT employees (CDT pension plan) which provides for old age, disability and survivors’ benefits. Benefits under the CDT pension plan are generally based on age at retirement, years of service and the employee’s annual earnings. The net periodic cost of this pension plan is determined using the projected unit credit method and several actuarial assumptions, the most significant of which are the discount rate and estimated service costs. No contributions have been made since the inception of the plan. Actuarial gains or losses in excess of 10% of the projected benefit obligation are being amortized and recognized as a component of net periodic benefit costs over the average remaining service period of the plan's active employees. As of June 30, 2016,2019, there is approximately $0.6$0.9 million in accumulated other comprehensive income related to the CDT pension plan that is expected to be recognized as a component of net periodic benefit costs over the next fiscal year.
GXS GermanyGER Plan
As part of our acquisition of GXS Group, Inc. (GXS) in Fiscal 2014, we acquiredassumed an unfunded defined benefit pension plan covering certain German employees which provides for old age, disability and survivors' benefits. The GXS GER plan has been closed to new participants since 2006. Benefits under the GXS GER plan are generally based on a participant’s remuneration, date of hire,

years of eligible service and age at retirement. The net periodic cost of this pension plan is determined using the projected unit credit method and several actuarial assumptions, the most significant of which are the discount rate and estimated service costs. No contributions have been made since the inception of the plan. Actuarial gains or losses in excess of 10% of the projected benefit obligation are being amortized and recognized as a component of net periodic benefit costs over the average remaining service period of the plan’s active employees. As of June 30, 2016,2019, there is approximately $0.2$0.3 million in accumulated other comprehensive income related to the GXS GER plan that is expected to be recognized as a component of net periodic benefit costs over the next fiscal year.
GXS PhilippinesPHP Plan
As part of our acquisition of GXS in Fiscal 2014, we acquiredassumed a primarily unfunded defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all of the GXS Philippines employees which provides for retirement, disability and survivors' benefits. Benefits under the GXS PHP plan are generally based on a participant’s remuneration, years of eligible service and age at retirement. The net periodic cost of this pension plan is determined using the projected unit credit method and several actuarial assumptions, the most significant of which are the discount rate and estimated service costs. Aside from an initial contribution which has a fair value of approximately $35.2 thousand$0.03 million as of June 30, 2016,2019, no additional contributions have been made since the inception of the plan. If actuarialActuarial gains or losses are in excess of 10% of the projected benefit obligation such gains or losses will beare being amortized and recognized as a component of net periodic benefit costs over the average remaining service period of the plan’s active employees. As of June 30, 2019, there is approximately $0.3 million in accumulated other comprehensive income related to the GXS PHP plan that is expected to be recognized as a component of net periodic benefit costs over the next fiscal year.

The following are the details of the change in the benefit obligation for each of the above mentioned pension plans for the periods indicated:
 As of June 30, 2019 As of June 30, 2018
 CDT GXS GER GXS PHP Total CDT GXS GER GXS PHP Total
Benefit obligation—beginning of period$32,651
 $25,382
 $3,853
 $61,886
 $28,881
 $23,730
 $4,495
 $57,106
Service cost550
 566
 771
 1,887
 501
 472
 832
 1,805
Interest cost642
 489
 300
 1,431
 607
 489
 241
 1,337
Benefits paid(626) (996) (140) (1,762) (580) (974) (141) (1,695)
Actuarial (gain) loss3,365
 1,872
 1,957
 7,194
 2,442
 997
 (1,313) 2,126
Foreign exchange (gain) loss(746) (574) 163
 (1,157) 800
 668
 (261) 1,207
Benefit obligation—end of period35,836
 26,739
 6,904
 69,479
 32,651
 25,382
 3,853
 61,886
Less: Current portion(675) (1,012) (124) (1,811) (655) (1,027) (138) (1,820)
Non-current portion of benefit obligation$35,161
 $25,727
 $6,780
 $67,668
 $31,996
 $24,355
 $3,715
 $60,066

 As of June 30, 2016 As of June 30, 2015
 CDT GXS GER GXS PHP Total CDT GXS GER GXS PHP Total
Benefit obligation—beginning of period$26,091
 $22,420
 $7,025
 $55,536
 $29,344
 $24,182
 $5,276
 $58,802
Service cost422
 359
 1,628
 2,409
 452
 360
 1,518
 2,330
Interest cost610
 543
 314
 1,467
 735
 625
 289
 1,649
Benefits paid(534) (770) (190) (1,494) (495) (793) (78) (1,366)
Actuarial (gain) loss3,299
 2,564
 (1,145) 4,718
 1,676
 2,701
 201
 4,578
Foreign exchange (gain)(438) (387) (291) (1,116) (5,621) (4,655) (181) (10,457)
Benefit obligation—end of period29,450
 24,729
 7,341
 61,520
 26,091
 22,420
 7,025
 55,536
Less: Current portion(589) (772) (30) (1,391) (575) (774) (26) (1,375)
Non-current portion of benefit obligation$28,861
 $23,957
 $7,311
 $60,129
 $25,516
 $21,646
 $6,999
 $54,161


The following are details of net pension expense relating to the following pension plans:
 Year Ended June 30,
 2019 2018
Pension expense:CDT GXS GER GXS PHP Total CDT GXS GER GXS PHP Total
Service cost$550
 $566
 $771
 $1,887
 $501
 $472
 $832
 $1,805
Interest cost642
 489
 300
 1,431
 607
 489
 241
 1,337
Amortization of actuarial (gains) and losses696
 130
 (562) 264
 541
 72
 (241) 372
Net pension expense$1,888
 $1,185
 $509
 $3,582
 $1,649
 $1,033
 $832
 $3,514

  Year Ended June 30,
  2016 2015 2014
Pension expense: CDT GXS GER GXS PHP Total CDT GXS GER GXS PHP Total CDT GXS GER GXS PHP Total
Service cost $422
 $359
 $1,628
 $2,409
 $452
 $360
 $1,518
 $2,330
 $458
 $173
 $724
 $1,355
Interest cost 610
 543
 314
 1,467
 735
 625
 289
 1,649
 877
 408
 125
 1,410
Amortization of actuarial gains and losses 425
 23
 
 448
 403
 
 
 403
 278
 
 
 278
Net pension expense $1,457
 $925
 $1,942
 $4,324
 $1,590
 $985
 $1,807
 $4,382
 $1,613
 $581
 $849
 $3,043



In determining the fair value of the pension plan benefit obligations as of June 30, 20162019 and June 30, 20152018, respectively, we used the following weighted-average key assumptions:
 As of June 30, 2019 As of June 30, 2018
 CDT GXS GER GXS PHP CDT GXS GER GXS PHP
Assumptions:           
Salary increases2.50% 2.50% 6.50% 3.50% 3.50% 6.50%
Pension increases2.00% 2.00% N/A 2.00% 2.00% N/A
Discount rate1.32% 1.32% 5.00% 2.00% 2.00% 7.25%
Normal retirement age65-67 65-67 60 65-67 65-67 60
Employee fluctuation rate:           
to age 20—% —% 12.19% —% —% 12.19%
to age 25—% —% 16.58% —% —% 16.58%
to age 301.00% —% 13.97% 1.00% —% 13.97%
to age 350.50% —% 10.77% 0.50% —% 10.77%
to age 40—% —% 7.39% —% —% 7.39%
to age 450.50% —% 3.28% 0.50% —% 3.28%
to age 500.50% —% —% 0.50% —% —%
from age 511.00% —% —% 1.00% —% —%

 As of June 30, 2016 As of June 30, 2015
 CDT GXS GER GXS PHP CDT GXS GER GXS PHP
Assumptions:           
Salary increases2.00% 2.00% 6.20% 2.00% 2.00% 7.00%
Pension increases1.75% 2.00% 4.75% 1.75% 2.00% 3.50%
Discount rate1.56% 1.56% 4.25% 2.36% 2.54% 4.75%
Normal retirement age65 65-67 60 65 65-67 60
Employee fluctuation rate:           
to age 20—% N/A 7.90% —% N/A 7.90%
to age 25—% N/A 5.70% —% N/A 5.70%
to age 301.00% N/A 4.10% 1.00% N/A 4.10%
to age 350.50% N/A 2.90% 0.50% N/A 2.90%
to age 40—% N/A 1.90% —% N/A 1.90%
to age 450.50% N/A 1.40% 0.50% N/A 1.40%
to age 500.50% N/A —% 0.50% N/A —%
from age 511.00% N/A —% 1.00% N/A —%

Anticipated pension payments under the pension plans for the fiscal years indicated below are as follows:

Fiscal years ending June 30,

CDT
GXS GER
GXS PHP
2020$675

$1,012

$161
2021758

1,011

153
2022832

1,044

352
2023933

1,043

208
20241,041

1,050

272
2025 to 20286,009

5,308

2,389
Total$10,248

$10,468

$3,535

Fiscal years ending June 30,

CDT
GXS GER
GXS PHP
2017$589

$772

$30
2018630

863

37
2019705

922

96
2020771

973

59
2021853

987

84
2022 to 20265,041

5,456

1,243
Total$8,589

$9,973

$1,549

Other Plans
Other plans include defined benefit pension plans that are offered by certain of our foreign subsidiaries. Many of these plans were assumed through our acquisitions or are required by local regulatory requirements. These other plans are primarily unfunded, with the aggregate projected benefit obligation included in our pension liability. The net periodic costcosts of these plans are determined using the projected unit credit method and several actuarial assumptions, the most significant of which are the discount rate and estimated service costs.
NOTE 12—SHARE CAPITAL, OPTION PLANS AND SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
Cash Dividends
For the year ended June 30, 20162019, pursuant to the Company’s dividend policy, we declared total non-cumulative dividends of $0.8300,$0.6300 per Common Share in the aggregate amount of $99.3$168.9 million, which we paid during the same period.
For the year ended June 30, 2015,2018, pursuant to the Company’s dividend policy, we paid total non-cumulative dividends of $0.7175,$0.5478 per Common Share in the aggregate amount of $87.6$145.6 million.
For the year ended June 30, 2014,2017, pursuant to the Company’s dividend policy, we paid total non-cumulative dividends of $0.6225,$0.4770 per Common Share in the aggregate amount of $74.7$120.6 million.

Share Capital
Our authorized share capital includes an unlimited number of Common Shares and an unlimited number of Preference Shares. No Preference Shares have been issued.
Treasury Stock
Repurchase
From time to time we may provide funds to an independent agent to facilitate repurchases of our Common Shares in connection with the settlement of awards under the Long-Term Incentive Plans (LTIP) or other plans.
During the year ended June 30, 2016,2019, we repurchased 225,000726,059 of our Common Shares forin the open market, at a cost of approximately $10.6$26.5 million for potential reissuance under our LTIP or other plans. (June 30, 2015—repurchased 240,222 Common Shares for $10.6 million,plans (year ended June 30, 2014—repurchased 25,760 Common Shares for $1.3 million)2018 and 2017—nil and 244,240, respectively, at a cost of nil and $8.2 million, respectively). See below for more details on our various plans.
Reissuance
During the year ended June 30, 2016,2019, we reissued 217,078and 613,524 Common Shares respectively, from treasury stock (June 30, 2015—377,775,(year ended June 30, 2014—484,2382018 and 2017—411,276 and 409,922 Common Shares)Shares, respectively), in connection with the settlement of our LTIP and other awards.
Share Repurchase Plan
On July 28, 2015, our board of directors (the Board) authorized the repurchase of up to $200 million of Common Shares (Share Repurchase Plan). Shares may be repurchased from time to time in the open market, private purchases through forward, derivative, accelerated repurchase or automatic repurchase transactions or otherwise.
During the year ended June 30, 2016, we repurchased and cancelled 1,476,248 Common Shares for approximately $65.5 million under our Share Repurchase Plan (June 30, 2015—nil, June 30, 2014—nil). Of the $65.5 million repurchased, $55.7 million was recorded to retained earnings to reflect the difference between the market price of Common Shares repurchased and its book value.
On July 26, 2016, our Board of Directors authorized a new share repurchase plan for the repurchase of up to $200 million of our Common Shares, pursuant to a normal course issuer bid.
Option Plans
A summary of stock options outstanding under our various2004 stock option plansplan is set forth below. All numbers shown in the chart below have been adjusted, where applicable, to account for the two-for-one stock splits that occurred on October 22, 2003, and February 18, 2014.2014 and January 24, 2017.
2004 Stock Option Plan
Date of inceptionOct-04
EligibilityEligible employees, as determined by the Board of Directors
Options granted to date32,398,418
Options exercised to date(17,663,048)
Options cancelled to date(7,632,617)
Options outstanding7,102,753
Termination grace periodsImmediately “for cause”; 90 days for any other reason; 180 days due to death
Vesting schedule25% per year, unless otherwise specified
Exercise price range$13.19 - $40.20
Expiration dates11/2/2019 to 5/7/2026
 1998 Stock
Option Plan
2004 Stock
Option Plan
Date of inceptionJun-98Oct-04
EligibilityEligible employees and directors,
as determined by the Board of Directors
Eligible employees and directors,
as determined by the Board of Directors
Options granted to date15,828,58013,463,382
Options exercised to date(10,718,360)(6,154,402)
Options cancelled to date(5,110,220)(3,131,572)
Options outstanding4,177,408
Termination grace periodsImmediately “for cause”;
90 days for any other
reason; 180 days due to death
Immediately “for cause”;
90 days for any other
reason; 180 days due to death
Vesting schedule25% per year, unless other-
wise specified
25% per year, unless other-
wise specified
Exercise price rangen/a$18.67 - $57.30
Expiration datesn/a10/29/2016 to
4/30/2023


The following table summarizes information regarding stock options outstanding at June 30, 2016:2019:
    
Options Outstanding 
 
Options Exercisable  
Range of Exercise
Prices
 Number of options
Outstanding as of
June 30, 2019
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (years) 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price 
 Number of options
Exercisable as of
June 30, 2019
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
$13.19
-$24.78
 516,429
2.72$21.81
 354,551
$21.33
24.79
-26.53
 562,200
1.7625.18
 562,200
25.18
26.54
-27.46
 1,230,000
1.3927.09
 330,000
27.09
27.47
-30.06
 768,566
3.5228.96
 466,254
28.61
30.07
-32.75
 680,000
3.7332.36
 27,500
30.37
32.76
-34.48
 760,620
5.1133.79
 224,875
33.66
34.49
-35.61
 849,118
5.5134.61
 204,372
34.61
35.62
-38.26
 380,000
6.5437.19
 6,250
36.50
38.27
-39.51
 730,820
6.1039.27
 

39.52
-40.20
 625,000
6.8540.10
 

$13.19
-$40.20
 7,102,753
4.10$31.82
 2,176,002
$27.44
    
Options Outstanding 
 
Options Exercisable  
Range of Exercise
Prices
 Number of options
Outstanding as of
June 30, 2016
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (years) 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price 
 Number of options
Exercisable as of
June 30, 2016
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
$18.67
-$26.37
 412,823
2.44$24.80
 383,488
$24.68
27.26
-29.64
 130,000
3.4128.47
 87,500
28.51
30.18
-30.19
 665,123
2.6030.18
 505,123
30.18
31.76
-45.73
 563,132
5.3941.35
 90,836
32.96
47.01
-49.04
 256,680
6.2047.48
 28,750
49.04
50.08
-50.09
 816,250
4.5850.08
 366,250
50.08
51.16
-54.17
 790,500
5.5253.65
 47,625
52.03
55.12
-55.65
 226,570
5.2755.50
 56,658
55.50
55.99
-56.00
 152,500
6.8355.99
 

57.29
-57.30
 163,830
5.1957.29
 40,958
57.29
$18.67
-$57.30
 4,177,408
4.56$43.87
 1,607,188
$36.03

Share-Based Payments
Total share-based compensation expense for the periods indicated below is detailed as follows:
 Year Ended June 30,
 2019 2018 2017
Stock options$10,232
 $9,828
 $12,196
Performance Share Units (issued under LTIP)3,461
 3,553
 3,624
Restricted Share Units (issued under LTIP)5,917
 6,602
 6,452
Restricted Share Units (other)175
 936
 2,804
Deferred Share Units (directors)3,133
 2,921
 2,849
Employee Share Purchase Plan3,852
 3,754
 2,582
Total share-based compensation expense$26,770
 $27,594
 $30,507

  Year Ended June 30,
  2016 2015 2014
Stock options $13,202
 $12,193
 7,883
Performance Share Units (issued under LTIP) 2,688
 2,287
 4,643
Restricted Share Units (issued under LTIP) 5,086
 4,574
 2,062
Restricted Share Units (fully vested) 
 
 3,300
Restricted Share Units (other) 1,573
 955
 470
Deferred Share Units (directors) 2,764
 2,038
 1,548
Employee Share Purchase Plan 665
 
 $
Total share-based compensation expense $25,978
 $22,047
 $19,906

Summary of Outstanding Stock Options
As of June 30, 2016,2019, an aggregate of 4,177,4087,102,753 options to purchase Common Shares were outstanding and an additional 2,749,8309,397,479 options to purchase Common Shares were available for issuance under our stock option plans. Our stock options generally vest over four years and expire between seven and ten years from the date of the grant. Currently we also have options outstanding that vest over five years, as well as options outstanding that vest based on meeting certain market conditions. The exercise price of all our options is set at an amount that is not less than the closing price of our Common Shares on the NASDAQ on the trading day immediately preceding the applicable grant date.
A summary of activity under our stock option plans for the year ended June 30, 2016 and 20152019 is as follows:

Options 
Weighted-
Average Exercise
Price
 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
(years)
 
Aggregate Intrinsic  Value
($’000s)
Options 
Weighted-
Average Exercise
Price
 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
(years)
 
Aggregate Intrinsic  Value
($’000s)
Outstanding at June 30, 20154,375,365
 $42.26
    
Outstanding at June 30, 20187,078,435
 $28.41
    
Granted737,640
 48.17
  1,870,340
 38.81
  
Exercised(468,295) 31.13
  (1,472,031) 24.20
  
Forfeited or expired(467,302) 48.33
  (373,991) 32.33
  
Outstanding at June 30, 20164,177,408
 $43.87
 4.56 $63,862
Exercisable at June 30, 20161,607,188
 $36.03
 3.41 $37,167
Outstanding at June 30, 20197,102,753
 $31.82
 4.10 $66,656
Exercisable at June 30, 20192,176,002
 $27.44
 3.03 $29,950
Options 
Weighted-
Average Exercise
Price
 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
(years)
 
Aggregate Intrinsic  Value
($’000s)
Options 
Weighted-
Average Exercise
Price
 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
(years)
 
Aggregate Intrinsic  Value
($’000s)
Outstanding at June 30, 20144,273,226
 $36.35
    
Outstanding at June 30, 20178,977,830
 $24.57
    
Granted1,368,410
 54.33
  1,322,340
 34.60
  
Exercised(476,103) 25.54
  (2,869,569) 18.94
  
Forfeited or expired(790,168) 41.25
  (352,166) 30.81
  
Outstanding at June 30, 20154,375,365
 $42.26
 4.96 $22,153
Exercisable at June 30, 20151,309,484
 $32.32
 3.48 $13,635
Outstanding at June 30, 20187,078,435
 $28.41
 4.43 $48,405
Exercisable at June 30, 20182,482,288
 $24.50
 3.13 $26,539
We estimate the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model or, where appropriate, the Monte Carlo Valuation Method, consistent with the provisions of ASC Topic 718, "Compensation—Stock Compensation" (Topic 718) and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107. The option-pricing models require input of subjective assumptions, including the estimated life of the option and the expected volatility of the underlying stock over the estimated life of the option. We use historical volatility as a basis for projecting the expected volatility of the underlying stock and estimate the expected life of our stock options based upon historical data.
We believe that the valuation techniques and the approach utilized to develop the underlying assumptions are appropriate in calculating the fair value of our stock option grants. Estimates of fair value are not intended, however, to predict actual future events or the value ultimately realized by employees who receive equity awards.

For the periods indicated, the weighted-average fair value of options and weighted-average assumptions were as follows:
 Year Ended June 30,Year Ended June 30,
 2016 2015 20142019 2018 2017
Weighted–average fair value of options granted $11.38
 $13.46
 $11.55
$8.39
 $7.58
 $7.06
Weighted-average assumptions used:           
Expected volatility 31.76% 31.74% 32.00%25.72% 26.95% 28.32%
Risk–free interest rate 1.31% 1.41% 1.34%2.57% 2.18% 1.46%
Expected dividend yield 1.62% 1.23% 1.32%1.54% 1.50% 1.43%
Expected life (in years) 4.33
 4.33
 4.36
4.44
 4.38
 4.51
Forfeiture rate (based on historical rates) 5% 5% 5%6% 6% 5%
Average exercise share price $48.17
 $54.33
 $46.52
$38.81
 $34.60
 $31.75
Derived service period (in years)* N/A
 2.07
 N/A
N/A
 N/A
 1.79

*Options valued using Monte Carlo Valuation Method

As of June 30, 2016,2019, the total compensation cost related to the unvested stock option awards not yet recognized was approximately $24.7$24.1 million, which will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.33.0 years.
No cash was used by us to settle equity instruments granted under share-based compensation arrangements.arrangements in any of the periods presented.
We have not capitalized any share-based compensation costs as part of the cost of an asset in any of the periods presented.

For the year ended June 30, 2016,2019, cash in the amount of $14.6$35.6 million was received as the result of the exercise of options granted under share-based payment arrangements. The tax benefit realized by us during the year ended June 30, 20162019 from the exercise of options eligible for a tax deduction was $0.8$2.9 million.
For the year ended June 30, 2015,2018, cash in the amount of $12.2$54.4 million was received as the result of the exercise of options granted under share-based payment arrangements. The tax benefit realized by us during the year ended June 30, 20152018 from the exercise of options eligible for a tax deduction was $1.0$1.5 million.
For the year ended June 30, 2014,2017, cash in the amount of $22.2$20.8 million was received as the result of the exercise of options granted under share-based payment arrangements. The tax benefit realized by us during the year ended June 30, 20142017 from the exercise of options eligible for a tax deduction was $1.8$2.2 million.
Long-Term Incentive Plans
We incentivize our executive officers, in part, with long termlong-term compensation pursuant to our LTIP. The LTIP is a rolling three year program that grants eligible employees a certain number of target Performance Share Units (PSUs) and/or Restricted Share Units (RSUs). Target PSUs become vested upon the satisfactionachievement of certain financial and/or operational performance criteria (the Performance Conditions) that are determined at the time of the grant. Target RSUs become vested when an eligible employee remains employed throughout the vesting period. LTIP grants that have recently vested, or have yet to vest, are described below. LTIP grants will be referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K based upon the year in which the grants are expected to vest.
Fiscal 2015 LTIP
Grants made in Fiscal 2013 under the LTIP (collectively referred to as Fiscal 2015 LTIP), took effect in Fiscal 2013 starting on November 2, 2012 for the RSUs and December 3, 2012 for the PSUs. We settled the Fiscal 2015 LTIP by issuing 202,078 Common Shares from our treasury stock during the three months ended December 31, 2015, with a cost of $5.0 million.
Fiscal 2016 LTIP
Grants made in Fiscal 2014 under the LTIP (collectively referred to as Fiscal 2016 LTIP) consisting of PSUs and RSUs, took effect in Fiscal 2014 starting on November 1, 2013. The Performance Conditions for vesting of the PSUs are based solely upon market conditions. RSUs granted are employee service-based awards and vest over the life of the Fiscal 2016 LTIP. We expect to settle the Fiscal 2016 LTIP awards in stock.
Fiscal 2017 LTIP
Grants made in Fiscal 2015 under the LTIP (collectively referred to as Fiscal 2017 LTIP), consisting of PSUs and RSUs, took effect in Fiscal 2015 starting on September 4, 2014. The Performance Conditions for vesting of the PSUs are based solely upon market conditions. The RSUs are employee service-based awards and vest over the life of the Fiscal 2017 LTIP. We expect to settle the Fiscal 2017 LTIP awards in stock.
Fiscal 2018 LTIP
Grants made in Fiscal 2016 under the LTIP (collectively referred to as Fiscal 2018 LTIP), consisting of PSUs and RSUs, took effect in Fiscal 2016 starting on August 23, 2015. The Performance Conditions for vesting of the PSUs are based solely upon market conditions. The RSUs are employee service-based awards and vest over the life of the Fiscal 2018 LTIP. We expect to settle the Fiscal 2018 LTIP awards in stock.
PSUs and RSUs granted under the LTIPs have been measured at fair value as of the effective date, consistent with Topic 718, and will be charged to share-based compensation expense over the remaining life of the plan. Stock options granted under the LTIPs have been measured using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, consistent with Topic 718. We estimate the fair value of PSUs using the Monte Carlo pricing model and RSUs have been valued based upon their grant date fair value.
As of June 30, 2016,2019, the total expected compensation cost related to the unvested LTIP awards not yet recognized was $12.9$13.3 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.8 years.
LTIP grants that have recently vested, or have yet to vest, are described below. LTIP grants are referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K based upon the year in which the grants are expected to vest.
Fiscal 2018 LTIP
Grants made in Fiscal 2016 under the LTIP (collectively referred to as Fiscal 2018 LTIP), consisting of PSUs and RSUs, took effect in Fiscal 2016 starting on August 23, 2015. We settled the Fiscal 2018 LTIP by issuing 539,103 Common Shares from treasury stock during the three months ended December 31, 2018, with a cost of $13.8 million.

Fiscal 2019 LTIP
Grants made in Fiscal 2017 under the LTIP (collectively referred to as Fiscal 2019 LTIP), consisting of PSUs and RSUs, took effect in Fiscal 2017 starting on August 14, 2016. The Performance Conditions for vesting of the PSUs are based solely upon market conditions. The RSUs are employee service-based awards and vest over the life of the Fiscal 2019 LTIP. We expect to settle the Fiscal 2019 LTIP awards in stock.
Fiscal 2020 LTIP
Grants made in Fiscal 2018 under the LTIP (collectively referred to as Fiscal 2020 LTIP), consisting of PSUs and RSUs, took effect in Fiscal 2018 starting on August 7, 2017. The Performance Conditions for vesting of the PSUs are based solely upon market conditions. The RSUs are employee service-based awards and vest over the life of the Fiscal 2020 LTIP. We expect to settle the Fiscal 2020 LTIP awards in stock.
Fiscal 2021 LTIP
Grants made in Fiscal 2019 under the LTIP (collectively referred to as Fiscal 2021 LTIP), consisting of PSUs and RSUs, took effect in Fiscal 2019 starting on August 6, 2018. The Performance Conditions for vesting of the PSUs are based solely upon market conditions. The RSUs are employee service-based awards and vest over the life of the Fiscal 2021 LTIP. We expect to settle the Fiscal 2021 LTIP awards in stock.
Restricted Share Units (RSUs)
During the year ended June 30, 2016,2019, we granted 61,036did not grant any RSUs to employees in accordance with employment and other agreements (June 30, 2015—45,000,(year ended June 30, 2014—nil)2018 and 2017—4,464 and 19,300 RSUs, respectively). The RSUs vest over a specified contract date, typically three years from the respective date of grants. We expect to settle the awards in stock.

During the year ended June 30, 2016,2019, we issued 15,00022,627 Common Shares from our treasury stock, with a cost of $0.3$0.7 million in connection with the settlement of these vested RSUs (June(year ended June 30, 2015—22,2222018 and 2017—98,625 and 70,000 Common Shares, respectively, with a cost of $1.3$2.1 million June 30, 2014—22,222 with a cost of $0.5 million)and $1.5 million, respectively).
Deferred Stock Units (DSUs)
During the year ended June 30, 2016,2019, we granted 55,858100,271 DSUs to certain non-employee directors (June 30, 2015—38,052,(year ended June 30, 2014—42,298)2018 and 2017—87,501 and 91,680 DSUs, respectively). The DSUs were issued under our Deferred Share Unit Plan. DSUs granted as compensation for directorsdirector fees vest immediately, whereas all other DSUs granted vest at our next annual general meeting following the granting of the DSUs. No DSUs are payable by us until the director ceases to be a member of the Board.
During the year ended June 30, 2019, we issued 51,794 Common Shares from treasury stock, with a cost of $2.0 million in connection with the settlement of vested DSUs (year ended June 30, 2018 and 2017—nil DSUs, respectively).
Employee Share Purchase Plan (ESPP)
We recently implementedOur ESPP offers employees a number of amendments to our ESPP, including increasing the purchase price discount from 5% toof 15% and permitting Common Shares to be purchased on the open market by the trustee of a trust, or by an agent or broker designated by an administrator, and transferred to eligible employees under the ESPP, as an alternative to the issuance of Common Shares from treasury (the Amendments). The Amendments apply to purchase periods commencing on or after January 1, 2016 unless otherwise determined by the Board or the compensation committee of the Board.
In accordance with the Amendments, duringDuring the year ended June 30, 2016, 80,2732019, 696,091 Common Shares were eligible for issuance to employees enrolled in the ESPP after factoring a purchase price discount of 15%. Any(year ended June 30, 2018 and 2017—729,521 and 530,170 Common Shares, that have been issued under the ESPP prior to the purchase period commencing on January 1, 2016 were issued at a purchase price discount of 5%respectively).
During the year ended June 30, 2016,2019, cash in the amount of approximately $5.5$22.2 million was received from employees relating to the ESPP (June 30, 2015—$3.1 million,(year ended June 30, 2014—2018 and 2017—$2.6 million)21.5 million and $14.8 million, respectively).

NOTE 13—GUARANTEES AND CONTINGENCIES
We have entered into the following contractual obligations with minimum payments for the indicated fiscal periods as follows:
 Payments due between
 Total July 1, 2019—
June 30, 2020
 July 1, 2020—
June 30, 2022
 July 1, 2022—
June 30, 2024
 July 1, 2024
and beyond
Long-term debt obligations (1)
$3,408,565
 $147,059
 $292,156
 $1,045,567
 $1,923,783
Operating lease obligations (2)
318,851
 72,853
 106,394
 59,441
 80,163
Purchase obligations11,280
 8,364
 2,747
 169
 
 $3,738,696
 $228,276
 $401,297
 $1,105,177
 $2,003,946

 Payments due between
 Total July 1, 2016—
June 30, 2017
 July 1, 2017—
June 30, 2019
 July 1, 2019—
June 30, 2021
 July 1, 2021
and beyond
Long-term debt obligations$2,961,817
 $113,854
 $226,916
 $954,797
 $1,666,250
Operating lease obligations*184,798
 42,374
 65,095
 40,738
 36,591
Purchase obligations7,543
 5,635
 1,787
 121
 
 $3,154,158
 $161,863
 $293,798
 $995,656
 $1,702,841
(1) Includes interest up to maturity and principal payments. Please see note 10 "Long-Term Debt" for more details.
*(2)Net of $6.9$30.7 million of sublease income to be received from properties which we have subleased to third parties.
Guarantees and Indemnifications
We have entered into customer agreements which may include provisions to indemnify our customers against third party claims that our software products or services infringe certain third party intellectual property rights and for liabilities related to a breach of our confidentiality obligations. We have not made any material payments in relation to such indemnification provisions and have not accrued any liabilities related to these indemnification provisions in our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Occasionally, we enter into financial guarantees with third parties in the ordinary course of our business, including, among others, guarantees relating to taxes and letters of credit on behalf of parties with whom we conduct business. Such agreements have not had a material effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Litigation
We are currently involved in various claims and legal proceedings.
Quarterly, we review the status of each significant legal matter and evaluate such matters to determine how they should be treated for accounting and disclosure purposes in accordance with the requirements of ASC Topic 450-20 "Loss Contingencies" (Topic 450-20). Specifically, this evaluation process includes the centralized tracking and itemization of the status of all our disputes and litigation items, discussing the nature of any litigation and claim, including any dispute or claim

that is reasonably likely to result in litigation, with relevant internal and external counsel, and assessing the progress of each matter in light of its merits and our experience with similar proceedings under similar circumstances.
If the potential loss from any claim or legal proceeding is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated, we accrue a liability for the estimated loss in accordance with Topic 450-20. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the aggregate of such estimated losses was not material to our consolidated financial position or resultresults of operations and we do not believe as of the date of this filing that it is reasonably possible that a loss exceeding the amounts already recognized will be incurred that would be material to our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Contingencies
IRS Matter
As we have previously disclosed, the United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is examining certain of our tax returns for our fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 (Fiscal 2010) through our fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 (Fiscal 2012), and in connection with those examinations is reviewing our internal reorganization in Fiscal 2010 to consolidate certain intellectual property ownership in Luxembourg and Canada and our integration of certain acquisitions into the resulting structure. We also previously disclosed that the examinations may lead to proposed adjustments to our taxes that may be material, individually or in the aggregate, and that we have not recorded any material accruals for any such potential adjustments in our Consolidated Financial Statements.
AsWe previously disclosed that, as part of these examinations, (which are ongoing), on July 17, 2015 we received from the IRS aan initial Notice of Proposed Adjustment (NOPA) in draft form, proposingthat, as revised by the IRS on July 11, 2018 proposes a one-time approximately $280$335 million increase to our U.S. federal taxes arising from the reorganization in Fiscal 2010 and proposing(the 2010 NOPA), plus penalties equal to 20% of the additional proposed taxes plusfor Fiscal 2010, and interest at the applicable statutory rate (which will continue to accrue untilpublished by the matter is resolved and may be substantial). A NOPA is an IRS position and does not impose an obligation to pay tax. TheIRS.

On July 11, 2018, we also received, consistent with previously disclosed expectations, a draft NOPA may be changed before the final NOPA is issued, including because the IRS reserved the right in the draft NOPA to increase the adjustment. Based on discussions with the IRS, we expect we will receive an additional NOPA proposing ana one time approximately $80 million increase to our U.S. federal taxes for Fiscal 2012 (the 2012 NOPA) arising from the integration of Global 360 Holding Corp. into the structure that resulted from the internal reorganization accompanied byin Fiscal 2010, plus penalties equal to 40% of the additional proposed taxes for Fiscal 2012, and interest.
On January 7, 2019, we received from the IRS official notification of proposed adjustments to our taxable income for Fiscal 2010 and Fiscal 2012, together with the 2010 NOPA and 2012 NOPA in final form. In each case, such documentation was as expected and on substantially the same terms as provided for in the previously disclosed respective draft NOPAs, with the exception of an additional proposed penalty as part of the 2012 NOPA.
A NOPA is an IRS position and does not impose an obligation to pay tax. We continue to strongly disagree with the IRS’ positions within the NOPAs and we are vigorously contesting the proposed adjustments to our taxable income, along with any proposed penalties and interest (although there can be no assurance that this will beinterest.
As of our receipt of the amount reflected in thefinal 2010 NOPA when received, including becauseand 2012 NOPA, our estimated potential aggregate liability, as proposed by the IRS, may assign a higher value to our intellectual property). Depending upon the outcome of these matters,including additional state income taxes plus penalties and interest that may be due. We currently estimate that, as of June 30, 2016, adjustments under the draft NOPA in its present form and the anticipated additional NOPA could result in an aggregate liabilitydue, was approximately $770 million, comprised of approximately $550$455 million inclusive ofin U.S. federal and state taxes, approximately $130 million of penalties, and approximately $185 million of interest. Interest will continue to accrue at the applicable statutory rates until the matter is resolved and may be substantial.
WeAs previously disclosed and noted above, we strongly disagree with the IRS’ positionpositions and intend towe are vigorously contestcontesting the proposed adjustments to our taxable income.income, along with the proposed penalties and interest. We are examining various alternatives available to taxpayers to contest the proposed adjustments.adjustments, including through IRS Appeals and U.S. Federal court. Any such alternatives could involve a lengthy process and result in the incurrence of significant expenses. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have not recorded any material accruals in respect of these examinations in our Consolidated Financial Statements. An adverse outcome of these tax examinations could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.
For additional information regarding the history of this IRS matter, please see Note 13 "Guarantees and Contingencies" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for Fiscal 2018.
CRA Matter
As part of its ongoing audit of our acquisitionCanadian tax returns, the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) has disputed our transfer pricing methodology used for certain intercompany transactions with our international subsidiaries and has issued notices of GXS,reassessment for Fiscal 2012, Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2014. Assuming the utilization of available tax attributes (further described below), we estimate our potential aggregate liability, as of June 30, 2019, in connection with the CRA's reassessments for Fiscal 2012, Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2014 to be limited to penalties and interest that may be due of approximately $25 million.
The notices of reassessment for Fiscal 2012, Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2014 would, as drafted, increase our taxable income by approximately $90 million to $100 million for each of those years, as well as impose a 10% penalty on the proposed adjustment to income.
We strongly disagree with the CRA's positions and believe the reassessments of Fiscal 2012, Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2014 (including any penalties) are without merit. We have filed notices of objection for Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2013, and we are currently seeking competent authority consideration under applicable international treaties in respect of these reassessments. We intend to file the notice of objection for Fiscal 2014 shortly.
Even if we are unsuccessful in challenging the CRA's reassessments to increase our taxable income for Fiscal 2012, Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2014, or potential reassessments that may be proposed for subsequent years currently under audit, we have inheritedelective deductions available for those years (including carry-backs from later years) that would offset such increased amounts so that no additional cash tax would be payable, exclusive of any assessed penalties and interest, as described above.
We will continue to vigorously contest the proposed adjustments to our taxable income and any penalty and interest assessments. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have not recorded any accruals in respect of these reassessments in our Consolidated Financial Statements. Audits by the CRA of our tax returns for fiscal years prior to Fiscal 2012 have been completed with no reassessment of our income tax liability in respect of our international transactions, including the transfer pricing methodology applied to them. The CRA is currently auditing Fiscal 2015, Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2017 and have proposed to reassess Fiscal 2015 in a tax disputemanner consistent with Fiscal 2012, Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2014. We are engaged in ongoing discussions with the CRA and continue to vigorously contest the CRA's audit positions.
GXS Brazil Matter
As previously disclosed and in connection with the intercompany charges between the Company’sGXS Group, Inc. and its subsidiary, GXS Tecnologia da Informação (Brasil) Ltda. (GXS Brazil), and the municipality of São Paulo, in connection with GXS Brazil’s judicial appeal of a tax claim in the amount of $2.5 million as of June 30, 2016. We currently have in place a bank guarantee in the amount of $3.7 million in recognition of this dispute. However, we believe that the position of the São Paulo tax authorities is not consistent with the relevant facts and based on information available on the case and other similar matters provided by local counsel, we believe that we can defend our position and that no tax is owed. Although we believe that the facts support our position, the ultimate outcome of this matter could result in a loss of up to the claim amount discussed above, plus future interest or penalties that may accrue.
Historically, prior to our acquisition of GXS, GXS would charge certain costs to its subsidiaries, including GXS Brazil, primarily based on historical transfer pricing studies, that were intended to reflect the costs incurred by subsidiariesapproximately $1.5 million

accrued in relation to services provided bythis matter became statute barred during the parent company to the subject subsidiary. year ended June 30, 2019 and accordingly was released as a recovery under "Special charges".
GXS recorded taxes on amounts billed, that were considered to be due based on the intercompany charges. GXS subsequently re-evaluated its intercompany charges to GXS Brazil and related taxes and, upon taking into consideration the current environment and judicial proceedings in Brazil, concluded that it was probable that certain indirect taxes would be assessable and payable based upon the accrual of such intercompany charges and has approximately $4.9 million accrued for the probable amount of a settlement related to the indirect taxes, interest and penalties.India Matter
Our Indian subsidiary, GXS India Technology Centre Private Limited (GXS India), is subject to potential assessments by Indian tax authorities in the city of Bangalore. GXS India has received assessment orders from the Indian tax authorities alleging that the transfer price applied to intercompany transactions was not appropriate. Based on advice from our tax advisors, we believe that the facts that the Indian tax authorities are using to support their assessment are incorrect. We have filed appeals

and anticipate an eventual settlement with the Indian tax authorities. We have accrued $1.5$1.3 million to cover our anticipated financial exposure in this matter.
Please also see Item 1A "Risk Factors" elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
NOTE 14—INCOME TAXES
Our effective tax rate represents the net effect of the mix of income earned in various tax jurisdictions that are subject to a wide range of income tax rates.
The following is a geographical breakdown of income before the provision for income taxes:
 Year Ended June 30,
 2019 2018 2017
Domestic income (loss)$269,331
 $238,405
 $110,562
Foreign income171,243
 147,721
 138,989
Income before income taxes$440,574
 $386,126
 $249,551

 
Year Ended June 30,  
 2016 2015 2014
Domestic income (loss)$(80,066) $(26,927) $(11,623)
Foreign income370,843
 292,971
 288,158
Income before income taxes$290,777
 $266,044
 $276,535
The provision for (recovery of) income taxes consisted of the following:
 Year Ended June 30,
 2019 2018 2017
Current income taxes (recoveries):     
Domestic$7,862
 $5,313
 $12,238
Foreign99,650
 48,777
 82,593
 107,512
 54,090
 94,831
Deferred income taxes (recoveries): 
  
  
Domestic52,889
 61,678
 (851,683)
Foreign(5,464) 28,058
 (19,512)
 47,425
 89,736
 (871,195)
Provision for (recovery of) income taxes$154,937
 $143,826
 $(776,364)


 
Year Ended June 30,  
 2016 2015 2014
Current income taxes (recoveries):     
Domestic$(3,119) $(839) $1,424
Foreign63,862
 47,055
 69,371
 60,743
 46,216
 70,795
Deferred income taxes (recoveries): 
  
  
Domestic(44,569) 3,390
 5,901
Foreign(9,892) (17,968) (18,235)
 (54,461) (14,578) (12,334)
Provision for income taxes$6,282
 $31,638
 $58,461
A reconciliation of the combined Canadian federal and provincial income tax rate with our effective income tax rate is as follows:
 Year Ended June 30,
 2019 2018 2017
Expected statutory rate26.5% 26.5% 26.5%
Expected provision for income taxes$116,752
 $102,323
 $66,131
Effect of foreign tax rate differences(1,344) 2,352
 8,647
Change in valuation allowance(5,045) 1,779
 520
Amortization of deferred charges
 4,242
 6,298
Effect of permanent differences(577) 4,332
 3,673
Effect of changes in unrecognized tax benefits31,992
 5,543
 14,427
Effect of withholding taxes2,097
 7,927
 3,845
Difference in tax filings from provision(250) 1,321
 (7,836)
Effect of U.S. tax reform
 19,037
 
Effect of tax credits for research and development(13,550) (3,875) (2,643)
Effect of accrual for undistributed earnings(13,112) (1,154) 5,613
Effect of Base Erosion and Anti-Abuse Tax (BEAT)16,030
 
 
Other Items5,473
 (1) 1,075
Impact of internal reorganization of subsidiaries16,471
 
 (876,114)
 $154,937
 $143,826
 $(776,364)

 
Year Ended June 30,  
 2016 2015 2014
Expected statutory rate26.5% 26.5% 26.5%
Expected provision for income taxes$77,056
 $70,501
 $73,282
Effect of foreign tax rate differences(71,478) (57,017) (52,577)
Change in valuation allowance(34,999) 6,617
 3,281
Amortization of deferred charges11,316
 10,525
 11,307
Effect of permanent differences10,711
 1,321
 7,643
Effect of changes in unrecognized tax benefits(264) (1,800) 13,214
Effect of withholding taxes3,457
 3,045
 2,234
Difference in tax filings from provision8,959
 1,657
 (2,581)
Other items1,524
 (3,211) 2,658
 $6,282
 $31,638
 $58,461
SubstantiallyIn Fiscal 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, substantially all the tax rate differential for international jurisdictions was driven by earnings in Luxembourg.the United States.
The effective tax rate decreased to 2.2%a provision of 35.2% for the year ended June 30, 2016,2019, compared to 11.9%37.2% for the year ended June 30, 2015.2018. The decrease toincrease in tax expense of $25.4$11.1 million was primarily due to the resultincrease in net income taxed at foreign rates of a decrease$10.7 million, an increase of $26.4 million in valuation allowancereserves for unrecognized tax benefits, an increase of $16.1 million arising on the introduction of BEAT in Fiscal 2019, and an increase of $16.3 million relating to our deferredthe tax assetsimpact of internal reorganizations of subsidiaries, partially offset by a the reversal of accruals for undistributed United States earnings of $14.8 million, the Fiscal 2018 impact of United States tax reform of $19.0 million which did not recur in the amount of $41.6 million, offset byFiscal 2019, an increase in the effecttax credits for research and development of permanent differences$9.7 million, an increase of $6.8 million in the amountrelease of $9.4valuation allowance, a decrease of $5.8 million and tax filings in excessthe impact of amounts previously recorded of $8.0 million.withholding taxes in Fiscal 2019. The remainder of the differences weredifference was due to normal course movements and non-material items.

The decrease in the valuation allowance of $41.6 million is primarily attributable to the Company'sIn July 2016, we implemented a reorganization of our subsidiaries worldwide with the view to continuing to enhance operational and administrative efficiencies through further consolidated ownership, management, and development of our intellectual property (IP) in Canada, continuing to reduce the number of entities in our group and working towards our objective of having a single operating legal entity in each jurisdiction. A significant tax benefit of $876.1 million, associated primarily with the recognition of a net deferred tax asset arising from the entry of the IP into Canada, was recognized in the first quarter of Fiscal 2017, as well as the integration of recently completed acquisitions, supporting the assessment that the Company will more likely than not realize the value of certain deferred tax assets within a reasonable timeframe.2017. For more details see note 23 “Subsequent Events".information relating to this, please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2017.
WeAs of June 30, 2019, we have approximately $53.3$242.3 million of domestic non-capital loss carryforwards. In addition, we have $621.8$387.6 million of foreign non-capital loss carryforwards of which $63.2$53.8 million have no expiry date. The remainder of the domestic and foreign losses expires between 20172020 and 2036.2039. In addition, investment tax credits of $45.9$58.6 million will expire between 20272020 and 2036.2039.

The primary components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows, for the periods indicated below:
 June 30,
 2019 2018
Deferred tax assets   
Non-capital loss carryforwards$161,119
 $129,436
Capital loss carryforwards155
 417
Undeducted scientific research and development expenses137,253
 123,114
Depreciation and amortization683,777
 829,369
Restructuring costs and other reserves17,845
 17,202
Deferred revenue53,254
 62,726
Other59,584
 57,461
Total deferred tax asset$1,112,987
 $1,219,725
Valuation Allowance$(77,328) $(80,924)
Deferred tax liabilities   
Scientific research and development tax credits$(14,482) $(13,342)
Other(72,599) (82,668)
Deferred tax liabilities$(87,081) $(96,010)
Net deferred tax asset$948,578
 $1,042,791
Comprised of:   
Long-term assets1,004,450
 1,122,729
Long-term liabilities(55,872) (79,938)
 $948,578
 $1,042,791
 June 30,  
 2016 2015
Deferred tax assets   
Non-capital loss carryforwards$230,936
 $223,812
Capital loss carryforwards473
 3,470
Undeducted scientific research and development expenses92,595
 80,804
Depreciation and amortization20,977
 25,974
Restructuring costs and other reserves16,008
 17,271
Deferred revenue72,537
 75,067
Other41,985
 47,581
Total deferred tax asset$475,511
 $473,979
Valuation allowance$(88,208) $(133,459)
Deferred tax liabilities   
Scientific research and development tax credits$(11,478) $(6,831)
Acquired intangibles(145,891) (180,457)
Other(68,004) (37,292)
Deferred tax liabilities$(225,373) $(224,580)
Net deferred tax asset$161,930
 $115,940
Comprised of:   
Long-term assets241,161
 181,587
Long-term liabilities(79,231) (65,647)
 $161,930
 $115,940

We believe that sufficient uncertainty exists regarding the realization of certain deferred tax assets that a valuation allowance is required. We continue to evaluate our taxable position quarterly and consider factors by taxing jurisdiction, including but not limited to factors such as estimated taxable income, any historical experience of losses for tax purposes and the future growth of OpenText.
The aggregate changes in the balance of our gross unrecognized tax benefits (including interest and penalties) were as follows:
Unrecognized tax benefits as of July 1, 2017$174,530
Increases on account of current year positions6,483
Increases on account of prior year positions17,794
Decreases due to settlements with tax authorities
Decreases due to lapses of statutes of limitations(20,995)
Unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2018$177,812
Increases on account of current year positions25,642
Increases on account of prior year positions15,024
Decreases due to settlements with tax authorities
Decreases due to lapses of statutes of limitations(9,236)
Unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2019$209,242

Unrecognized tax benefits as of July 1, 2014$190,219
Increases on account of current year positions5,881
Increases on account of prior year positions1,376
Decreases due to settlements with tax authorities(3,084)
Decreases due to lapses of statutes of limitations(14,143)
Unrecognized tax benefits as of July 1, 2015$180,249
Increases on account of current year positions4,669
Increases on account of prior year positions8,366
Decreases due to settlements with tax authorities(1,147)
Decreases due to lapses of statutes of limitations(17,652)
Unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2016$174,485

Included in the above tabular reconciliation are unrecognized tax benefits of $23.5$11.2 million relating to deferred tax assets in jurisdictions in which these deferred tax assets are offset with valuation allowances. The net unrecognized tax benefit excluding these deferred tax assets is $150.9approximately $198.1 million as of June 30, 20162019 (June 30, 2015—2018—$155.1167.2 million).
We recognize interest expense and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.
For the yearsyear ended June 30, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, we recognized the following amounts as income tax-related interest expense and penalties:

 Year Ended June 30,Year Ended June 30,
 2016 2015 20142019 2018 2017
Interest expense $6,534
 $4,451
 $6,969
$10,512
 $6,233
 $13,028
Penalties expense (recoveries) (2,761) (2,032) 287
945
 (191) 438
Total $3,773
 $2,419
 $7,256
$11,457
 $6,042
 $13,466

As of June 30, 2016 and 2015, theThe following amounts have been accrued on account of income tax-related interest expense and penalties:
As of June 30, 2016 As of June 30, 2015As of June 30, 2019 As of June 30, 2018
Interest expense accrued *$34,476
 $28,827
$64,530
 $54,058
Penalties accrued *$1,615
 $5,040
$2,525
 $2,438
*
* These balances have been included within "Long-term income taxes payable" within the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
These balances have been included within "Long-term income taxes payable" within the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
We believe that it is reasonably possible that the gross unrecognized tax benefits, as of June 30, 2016,2019, could decrease tax expense in the next 12 months by $3.8$17.5 million, relating primarily to the expiration of competent authority relief and tax years becoming statute barred for purposes of future tax examinations by local taxing jurisdictions.
Our four most significant tax jurisdictions are Canada, the United States, Luxembourg and Germany. Our tax filings remain subject to audits by applicable tax authorities for a certain length of time following the tax year to which those filings relate. The earliest fiscal years open for examination are 20082012 for Germany, 2010 for the United States, 20112012 for Luxembourg, and 2012 for Canada.
We are subject to tax audits in all major taxing jurisdictions in which we operate and currently have tax audits open in Canada, the United States, France, Germany, India, the NetherlandsUnited Kingdom and Japan.Belgium. On a quarterly basis we assess the status of these examinations and the potential for adverse outcomes to determine the adequacy of the provision for income and other taxes. Statements regarding the United States and Canada audits are included in note 13.13 "Guarantees and Contingencies".
The timing of the resolution of income tax audits is highly uncertain, and the amounts ultimately paid, if any, upon resolution of the issues raised by the taxing authorities may differ from the amounts accrued. It is reasonably possible that within the next 12 months we will receive additional assessments by various tax authorities or possibly reach resolution of income tax audits in one or more jurisdictions. These assessments or settlements may or may not result in changes to our contingencies related to positions on tax filings. The actual amount of any change could vary significantly depending on the ultimate timing and nature of any settlements. We cannot currently provide an estimate of the range of possible outcomes. For more information relating to certain tax audits, please refer to note 13.13 "Guarantees and Contingencies".

As at June 30, 2016,2019, we have provided $15.9recognized a provision of $17.4 million (June 30, 2015—2018—$12.1 million)28.5 million) in respect of both additional foreign withholding taxes or deferred income tax liabilities for temporary differences related to the undistributed earnings of certain non-United States subsidiaries and planned periodic repatriations from certain United States and LuxembourgGerman subsidiaries, that will be subject to withholding taxes upon distribution. During the year ended June 30, 2019, we reversed previous accruals related to the undistributed earnings of our United States subsidiaries in the amount of $14.8 million. These earnings are now considered to be permanently reinvested in the United States, as there is no expectation of future distributions of earnings in the foreseeable future. We have not provided for additional foreign withholding taxes or deferred income tax liabilities related to undistributed earnings of all other non-Canadian subsidiaries, since such earnings are considered permanently invested in those subsidiaries or are not subject to withholding taxes. It is not practicable to reasonably estimate the amount of additional deferred income tax liabilities or foreign withholding taxes that may be payable should these earnings be distributed in the future.
On December 22, 2017, the United States enacted tax reform legislation through the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which significantly changed the existing US tax laws, including a reduction in the federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, and the transition of US international taxation from a worldwide tax system to a partially territorial tax system. As a result of the enactment of the legislation, the Company incurred a one-time tax expense of $19.0 million in the year ended June 30, 2018, primarily related to the transition tax on accumulated foreign earnings and the re-measurement of certain deferred tax assets and liabilities. During the year ended June 30, 2019, there was a reduction of $0.9 million to this amount, mainly attributable to evaluating the portion of our existing Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) credit carryforwards expected to be refundable as a result of the repeal of corporate AMT. The portion of the tax expense attributable to the transition tax is payable over a period of up to eight years.
In accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 “Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” (SAB 118), the Company completed its analysis of the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act by December 22, 2018. The Company's final determination of the total one-time tax expense as a result of the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is $18.1 million.

NOTE 15—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
ASC Topic 820 “Fair Value Measurement” (Topic 820) defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and addresses disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. Fair value is the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid upon transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date and in the principal or most advantageous market for that asset or liability. The fair value, in this context, should be calculated based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, not on assumptions specific to the entity. In addition, the fair value of liabilities should include consideration of non-performance risk, including our own credit risk.
In addition to defining fair value and addressing disclosure requirements, Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three levels based on the extent to which inputs used in measuring fair value are observable in the market. Each fair value measurement is reported in one of the three levels which are determined by the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. These levels are:
Level 1—inputs are based upon unadjusted quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.
Level 2—inputs are based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3—inputs are generally unobservable and typically reflect management’s estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The fair values are therefore determined using model-based techniques that include option pricing models, discounted cash flow models, and similar techniques.


Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis:
Our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis consisted of the following types of instruments as of June 30, 20162019 and June 30, 2015:2018:
 June 30, 2019 June 30, 2018
   Fair Market Measurements using:   Fair Market Measurements using:
 June 30, 2019 
Quoted prices
in active
markets for
identical
assets/
(liabilities)
 
Significant
other
observable
inputs
 
Significant
unobservable
inputs
 June 30, 2018 
Quoted prices
in active
markets for
identical
assets/
(liabilities)
 
Significant
other
observable
inputs
 
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
Financial Assets:               
Derivative financial instrument asset
(note 16)
$736
 N/A $736
 N/A $
 N/A $
 N/A
 $736
 N/A $736
 N/A $
 N/A $
 N/A
                
Financial Liabilities:               
Foreign currency forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges (note 16)$
 N/A $
 N/A $(1,319) N/A $(1,319) N/A
 $
 N/A $
 N/A $(1,319) N/A $(1,319) N/A
 June 30, 2016 June 30, 2015
   Fair Market Measurements using:   Fair Market Measurements using:
 June 30, 2016 
Quoted prices
in active
markets for
identical
assets/
(liabilities)
 
Significant
other
observable
inputs
 
Significant
unobservable
inputs
 June 30, 2015 
Quoted prices
in active
markets for
identical
assets/
(liabilities)
 
Significant
other
observable
inputs
 
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
Financial Assets:               
Short-term investments*$11,839
 n/a $11,839
 n/a $20,274
 n/a $20,274
 n/a
Derivative financial instrument asset (note 16)792
 n/a 792
 n/a 273
 n/a 273
 n/a
 $12,631
 n/a $12,631
 n/a $20,547
 n/a $20,547
 n/a
*These assets in the table above are classified as Level 2 as certain specific assets included within may not have quoted prices that are readily accessible in an active market or we may have relied on alternative pricing methods that do not rely exclusively on quoted prices to determine the fair value of the investments.


Our valuation techniques used to measure the fair values of the derivative instruments, the counterparty to which has high credit ratings, were derived from pricing models including discounted cash flow techniques, with all significant inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market data, as no quoted market prices exist for these instruments. Our discounted cash flow techniques use observable market inputs, such as, where applicable, foreign currency spot and forward rates.

Our cash and cash equivalents, along with our accounts receivable and accounts payable and accrued liabilities balances, are measured and recognized in our Consolidated Financial Statements at an amount that approximates their fair value (a Level 2 measurement) due to their short maturities.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
We measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These assets are recognized at fair value when they are deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired. During the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, no indications of impairment were identified and therefore no fair value measurements were required.
If applicable, we will recognize transfers between levels within the fair value hierarchy at the end of the reporting period in which the actual event or change in circumstance occurs. During the yearsyear ended June 30, 20162019 and 2015,2018, we did not have any transfers between Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3.
Short-term InvestmentsAssets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
Short-term investments are classified as available for sale securitiesWe measure certain assets and are recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheetsliabilities at fair value with unrealized gains or losses reported ason a separate component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.
A summary of our short-term investments outstanding as ofnonrecurring basis. These assets and liabilities are recognized at fair value when they are deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired. During the year ended June 30, 20162019 and 2015 is as follows:
 As of June 30, 2016 As of June 30, 2015
 Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized (Losses) Estimated Fair Value Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized (Losses) Estimated Fair Value
Short-term investments$11,406
 $436
 $(3) $11,839
 $20,286
 $2
 $(14) $20,274

2018, no indications of impairment were identified and therefore no fair value measurements were required.
NOTE 16—DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
Foreign Currency Forward Contracts
We are engaged in hedging programs with relationshipvarious banks to limit the potential foreign exchange fluctuations incurred on future cash flows relating to a portion of our Canadian dollar payroll expenses. We operate internationally and are therefore exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations in the normal course of our business, in particular to changes in the Canadian dollar on account of large costs that are incurred from our centralized Canadian operations, which are denominated in Canadian dollars. As part of our risk management strategy, we use foreign currency forward contracts to hedge portions of our payroll exposure with typical maturities of between one and twelve months. We do not use derivativesforeign currency forward contracts for speculative purposes.
We have designated these transactions as cash flow hedges of forecasted transactions under ASC Topic 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” (Topic 815). As the critical terms of the hedging instrument and of the entire hedged forecasted transaction are the same, in accordance with Topic 815, we have been able to conclude that changes in fair value or cash flows attributable to the risk being hedged are expected to completely offset at inception and on an ongoing basis. Accordingly, quarterly unrealized gains or losses on the effective portion of these forward contracts have been included within other comprehensive income. The fair value of the contracts, as of June 30, 20162019, is recorded within "Prepaid expenses and other current assets”.
As of June 30, 20162019, the notional amount of forward contracts we held to sell U.S. dollars in exchange for Canadian dollars was $33.2$62.0 million (June 30, 20152018$76.447.1 million).
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments and Effect of Derivative Instruments on Financial Performance
The effect of these derivative instruments on our Consolidated Financial Statements for the periods indicated below were as follows (amounts presented do not include any income tax effects).

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments in the Consolidated Balance Sheets (see note 15)15 "Fair Value Measurement")
  As of June 30, 2019 As of June 30, 2018
DerivativesBalance Sheet LocationFair Value
Asset (Liability)
 Fair Value
Asset (Liability)
Foreign currency forward contracts designated as cash flow hedgesPrepaid expenses and other current assets (Accounts payable and accrued liabilities)$736
 $(1,319)

  As of June 30, 2016 As of June 30, 2015
DerivativesBalance Sheet LocationFair Value
Asset (Liability)
 Fair Value
Asset (Liability)
Foreign currency forward contracts designated as cash flow hedgesPrepaid expenses and other current assets$792
 $273

Effects of Derivative Instruments on Income and Other Comprehensive Income (OCI)
Year Ended June 30, 2019
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging RelationshipAmount of Gain or (Loss)
Recognized in OCI on
Derivatives 
(Effective
Portion)
 Location of
Gain or (Loss)
Reclassified
from
Accumulated
OCI into
Income
(Effective
Portion)
 
Amount of Gain or
(Loss) Reclassified from
Accumulated OCI into
Income (Effective
Portion)
 Location of
Gain or (Loss)
Recognized
in Income on
Derivatives
(Ineffective
Portion and
Amount
Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing)
 
Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in
Income on Derivatives
(Ineffective Portion
and Amount Excluded
from Effectiveness
Testing)
Foreign currency forward contracts$22
 Operating
expenses
 $(2,033) N/A $
          
Year Ended June 30, 2018
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging RelationshipAmount of Gain or (Loss)
Recognized in OCI on
Derivatives 
(Effective
Portion)
 Location of
Gain or (Loss)
Reclassified
from
Accumulated
OCI into
Income
(Effective
Portion)
 Amount of Gain or
(Loss) Reclassified from
Accumulated OCI into
Income (Effective
Portion)
 Location of
Gain or (Loss)
Recognized
in Income on
Derivatives
(Ineffective
Portion and
Amount
Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing)
 Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in
Income on Derivatives
(Ineffective Portion
and Amount Excluded
from Effectiveness
Testing)
Foreign currency forward contracts$(647) Operating
expenses
 $1,846
 N/A $
Year Ended June 30, 2016
Derivatives in Cash Flow
Hedging Relationship
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
Recognized in OCI on
Derivatives 
(Effective
Portion)
 
Location of
Gain or (Loss)
Reclassified
from
Accumulated
OCI into
Income
(Effective
Portion)
 
Amount of Gain or
(Loss) Reclassified from
Accumulated OCI into
Income (Effective
Portion)
 
Location of
Gain or (Loss)
Recognized
in Income on
Derivatives
(Ineffective
Portion and
Amount
Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing)
 
Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in
Income on Derivatives
(Ineffective Portion
and Amount Excluded
from Effectiveness
Testing)
Foreign currency forward contracts$(3,502) Operating
expenses
 $(4,021) N/A $
          
Year Ended June 30, 2015
Derivatives in Cash Flow
Hedging Relationship
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
Recognized in OCI on
Derivatives 
(Effective
Portion)
 Location of
Gain or (Loss)
Reclassified
from
Accumulated
OCI into
Income
(Effective
Portion)
 Amount of Gain or
(Loss) Reclassified from
Accumulated OCI into
Income (Effective
Portion)
 Location of
Gain or (Loss)
Recognized
in Income on
Derivatives
(Ineffective
Portion and
Amount
Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing)
 Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in
Income on Derivatives
(Ineffective Portion
and Amount Excluded
from Effectiveness
Testing)
Foreign currency forward contracts$(8,252) Operating
expenses
 $(7,769) N/A $


NOTE 17—SPECIAL CHARGES (RECOVERIES)
Special charges (recoveries) include costs and recoveries that relate to certain restructuring initiatives that we have undertaken from time to time under our various restructuring plans, as well as acquisition-related costs and other miscellaneous charges.
 Year Ended June 30,
 2019 2018 2017
Fiscal 2019 Restructuring Plan$28,318
 $
 $
Fiscal 2018 Restructuring Plan515
 10,154
 
Fiscal 2017 Restructuring Plan898
 7,207
 33,827
Restructuring Plans prior to Fiscal 2017 Restructuring Plan(620) 279
 (340)
Acquisition-related costs5,625
 4,805
 15,938
Other charges (recoveries)983
 6,766
 14,193
Total$35,719
 $29,211
 $63,618

  Year Ended June 30,
  2016 2015 2014
Fiscal 2015 Restructuring Plan $22,179
 $8,218
 $
OpenText/GXS Restructuring Plan (3,427) 8,163
 19,306
Restructuring Plans prior to OpenText/GXS Restructuring Plan (108) (1,809) 7,492
Acquisition-related costs 7,710
 4,462
 10,074
Other charges (recoveries) 8,492
 (6,211) (5,558)
Total $34,846
 $12,823
 $31,314
Fiscal 20152019 Restructuring Plan
In the third quarter ofDuring Fiscal 2015 and in the context of the acquisition of Actuate Corporation (Actuate),2019, we began to implement restructuring activities to streamline our operations (OpenText/Actuate(Fiscal 2019 Restructuring Plan). We subsequently announced, on May 20, 2015 that we were initiating a restructuring program, including in conjunctionconnection with organizational changesour recent acquisitions of Catalyst and Liaison, to supporttake further steps to improve our cloud strategy and drive further operational efficiencies. These charges are combined with the OpenText/Actuate Restructuring Plan (collectively referred to as the Fiscal 2015 Restructuring Plan) and are presented below.efficiency. The Fiscal 2015

2019 Restructuring Plan charges relate to workforce reductions and facility consolidations. These charges require management to make certain judgments and estimates regarding the amount and timing of restructuring charges or recoveries. Our estimated liability could change subsequent to its recognition, requiring adjustments to the expense and the liability recorded. On a quarterly basis, we conduct an evaluation of the related liabilities and expenses and revise our assumptions and estimates as appropriate.
As of June 30, 2016,2019, we expect total costs to be incurred in conjunction with the Fiscal 20152019 Restructuring Plan to be approximately $32.0 to $35.0$30.0 million, of which $30.4$28.3 million has already been recorded within Special"Special charges (recoveries)" to date. We do not expect to incur any further significant charges relatedrelating to this plan.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending liability for the yearsyear ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 are2019 is shown below.
Fiscal 2015 Restructuring Plan
Workforce
reduction
 Facility costs Total
Balance as of June 30, 2015$3,842
 $2,126
 $5,968
Fiscal 2019 Restructuring Plan
Workforce
reduction
 Facility costs Total
Balance payable as at June 30, 2018$
 $
 $
Accruals and adjustments17,249
 4,930
 22,179
12,460
 15,858
 28,318
Cash payments(17,290) (2,361) (19,651)(10,420) (4,739) (15,159)
Non-cash adjustments
 (3,393) (3,393)
Foreign exchange(656) 351
 (305)(221) (2,438) (2,659)
Balance as of June 30, 2016$3,145
 $5,046
 $8,191
Balance payable as at June 30, 2019$1,819
 $5,288
 $7,107
*non-cash adjustments primarily relate to the write-off of fixed assets associated with a restructured facility.
Fiscal 2015 Restructuring Plan
Workforce
reduction
 Facility costs Total
Balance as of June 30, 2014$
 $
 $
Accruals and adjustments6,015
 2,203
 8,218
Cash payments(2,135) (61) (2,196)
Foreign exchange(38) (16) (54)
Balance as of June 30, 2015$3,842
 $2,126
 $5,968
OpenText/GXSFiscal 2018 Restructuring Plan
In the third quarter ofDuring Fiscal 20142018 and in the context of the acquisitionour acquisitions of GXS,Covisint, Guidance and Hightail (each defined below), we began to implement restructuring activities to streamline our operations (OpenText/GXS(collectively referred to as the Fiscal 2018 Restructuring Plan). TheseThe Fiscal 2018 Restructuring Plan charges relate to workforce reductions and facility consolidations and other miscellaneous direct costs.consolidations. These charges require management to make certain judgments and estimates regarding the amount and timing of restructuring charges or recoveries. Our estimated liability could change subsequent to its recognition, requiring adjustments to the expense and the liability recorded. On a quarterly basis, we conduct an evaluation of the related liabilities and expenses and revise our assumptions and estimates as appropriate.
Since the inception of the plan, $24.1approximately $10.7 million has been recorded within Special charges."Special charges (recoveries)" to date. We do not expect to incur any further significant charges relatedrelating to this plan.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending liability for the yearsyear ended June 30, 20162019 and 2015 are2018 is shown below.
Fiscal 2018 Restructuring Plan
Workforce
reduction
 Facility costs Total
Balance payable as at June 30, 2017$
 $
 $
Accruals and adjustments8,511
 1,643
 10,154
Cash payments(8,845) (489) (9,334)
Foreign exchange and other non-cash adjustments892
 11
 903
Balance payable as at June 30, 2018$558
 $1,165
 $1,723
Accruals and adjustments(20) 535
 515
Cash payments(337) (928) (1,265)
Foreign exchange and other non-cash adjustments(51) (286) (337)
Balance payable as at June 30, 2019$150
 $486
 $636

Fiscal 2017 Restructuring Plan
OpenText/GXS Restructuring Plan
Workforce
reduction
 Facility costs Other Total
Balance as of June 30, 2015$2,846
 $4,436
 $
 $7,282
Accruals and adjustments(1,878) (1,549) 
 (3,427)
Cash payments(648) (1,715) 
 (2,363)
Foreign exchange(205) (566) 
 (771)
Balance as of June 30, 2016$115
 $606
 $
 $721
During Fiscal 2017 and in the context of acquisitions made in Fiscal 2017, we began to implement restructuring activities to streamline our operations (collectively referred to as the Fiscal 2017 Restructuring Plan). The Fiscal 2017 Restructuring Plan charges relate to workforce reductions and facility consolidations. These charges require management to make certain judgments and estimates regarding the amount and timing of restructuring charges or recoveries. Our estimated liability could change subsequent to its recognition, requiring adjustments to the expense and the liability recorded. On a quarterly basis, we conduct an evaluation of the related liabilities and expenses and revise our assumptions and estimates as appropriate.
OpenText/GXS Restructuring Plan
Workforce
reduction
 Facility costs Other Total
Balance as of June 30, 2014$5,051
 $6,028
 $
 $11,079
Accruals and adjustments5,244
 1,159
 1,760
 8,163
Cash payments(6,848) (2,914) (1,760) (11,522)
Foreign exchange(601) 163
 
 (438)
Balance as of June 30, 2015$2,846
 $4,436
 $
 $7,282
Since the inception of the plan, $41.9 million has been recorded within "Special charges (recoveries)". We do not expect to incur any further significant charges relating to this plan.


A reconciliation of the beginning and ending liability for the year ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 is shown below.
Fiscal 2017 Restructuring Plan
Workforce
reduction
 Facility costs Total
Balance payable as at June 30, 2017$10,045
 $1,369
 $11,414
Accruals and adjustments3,432
 3,775
 7,207
Cash payments(12,342) (1,627) (13,969)
Foreign exchange and other non-cash adjustments455
 (86) 369
Balance payable as at June 30, 2018$1,590
 $3,431
 $5,021
Accruals and adjustments(254) 1,152
 898
Cash payments(213) (1,290) (1,503)
Foreign exchange and other non-cash adjustments(77) (344) (421)
Balance payable as at June 30, 2019$1,046
 $2,949
 $3,995

Acquisition-related costs
Included within "Special charges (recoveries)" for the year ended June 30, 20162019 are costs incurred directly in relation to acquisitions in the amount of $7.7$5.6 million (June 30, 2015—$4.5 million,(year ended June 30, 2014—2018 and 2017—$10.1 million)4.8 million and $15.9 million, respectively).
Other charges (recoveries)
ERP Implementation Costs
We are currently involved in a one-time project to implement a broad enterprise resource planning (ERP) system. The project is expected to be completed within our fiscal year ended June 30, 2017.
For the year ended June 30, 2016, we incurred costs of $8.52019, "Other charges" include (i) $1.1 million relating to this project (June 30, 2015—nil, June 30, 2014—nil).
Otherone-time system implementation costs and (ii) $1.4 million relating to miscellaneous other charges. These charges were partially offset by a recovery of $1.5 million relating to certain pre-acquisition sales and use tax liabilities becoming statute barred.
For the year ended June 30, 2016,2018, "Other costs"charges" primarily include (i) $6.4 million relating to the set up of a broad ERP system and other system implementation costs and (ii) $4.9 million relating to miscellaneous other charges. These charges were partially offset by (i) $2.3 million relating to certain pre-acquisition sales and use tax liabilities that were recovered outside of the acquisition's one year measurement period and (ii) $2.2 million relating to certain pre-acquisition sales and use tax liabilities becoming statute barred.
For the year ended June 30, 2017, "Other charges" primarily include (i) $11.0 million relating to the set up of a broad ERP system, (ii) a net charge of $4.8$6.5 million relating to commitment fees, (iii) $1.4 million relating to post-acquisition integration costs necessary to streamline an acquired company into our operations and costs incurred to reorganize certain legal entities including consolidation of intellectual property, (ii) $1.1(iv) $0.8 million relating to assets disposed in connection with a restructured facility and (iii) $0.3 million of other miscellaneous charges.facility. These charges were partially offset by (i) a recovery of $5.7$4.5 million relating to certain pre-acquisition sales and use tax liabilities being released upon settlement or becoming statute barred and (ii) a recovery of $0.5 million relating to interest and pre-acquisition liabilities being released on becoming statute barred.
Included within "Other charges (recoveries)" for the year ended June 30, 2015 is (i) a recovery of $11.5 million relating to certain pre-acquisition sales and use tax liabilities being released upon settlement or becoming statute barred and (ii) a recovery of $1.4 million relating to interest released on certain pre-acquisition liabilities. These recoveries were offset by (i) $2.9 million relating to the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the repayment of a $600 million term loan facility, (ii) $2.1 million relating to post-business combination compensation obligations associated with the acquisition of Actuate Corporation and (iii) $1.2$1.3 million relating to a reduction in leasehold improvements associated with a restructured facility.recovery on certain interest on pre-acquisition liabilities becoming statute barred. The remaining amounts relate to miscellaneous other charges.
Included within "Other charges (recoveries)" for the year ended June 30, 2014 is a net recovery of $7.0 million relating to a reduction of certain pre-acquisition tax liabilities, along with the associated interest accrual. This recovery was offset by a charge of $1.4 million relating to a settlement agreement reached in connection with the acquisition of IXOS Software AG in February 2004.
NOTE 18—ACQUISITIONS
Fiscal 20162019 Acquisitions
Acquisition of ANXe Business CorporationCatalyst Repository Systems Inc.
On May 1, 2016,On January 31, 2019, we acquired all of the equity interest in ANXe Business Corporation (ANX),Catalyst for approximately $70.8 million in an all cash transaction. Catalyst is a leading provider of cloud-based information exchange services to the automotiveeDiscovery that designs, develops and healthcare industries, for approximately $104.6 million.supports market-leading cloud eDiscovery software. In accordance with ASC Topic 805 "Business Combinations" (Topic 805), this acquisition was accounted for as a business combination. We believe this acquisition will strengthencomplements and extends our industry presence and reach in the automotive and healthcare industries through strong customer relationships and targeted business partner collaboration solutions.Enterprise Information Management (EIM) portfolio.
The results of operations of ANXthis acquisition have been consolidated with those of OpenText beginning May 1, 2016.January 31, 2019.
Preliminary Purchase Price Allocation
The recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based upon their preliminary fair values as of May 1, 2016,January 31, 2019, are set forth below:

Current assets$9,699
Non-current tangible assets5,754
Intangible customer assets30,607
Intangible technology assets11,658
Liabilities assumed(17,891)
Total identifiable net assets39,827
Goodwill30,973
Net assets acquired$70,800
Current assets$9,712
Non-current tangible assets511
Intangible customer assets49,700
Intangible technology assets5,600
Liabilities assumed(26,190)
Total identifiable net assets39,333
Goodwill65,237
Net assets acquired$104,570


The goodwill of $65.2approximately $31.0 million is primarily attributable to the synergies expected to arise after the acquisition. Of this goodwill, approximately $7.0$3.1 million is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
Included in total identifiable net assets is acquired deferred revenue with a fair value of $0.8 million, which represents our estimate of the fair value of the contractual obligations assumed based on a preliminary valuation. In arriving at this fair value, we reduced the acquired company’s original carrying value by an insignificant amount.
The fair value of current assets acquired includes accounts receivable with a fair value of $5.7$10.8 million. The gross amount receivable was $5.8$11.8 million, of which $1.0 million is expected to be uncollectible.
Acquisition-related costs for Catalyst included in "Special charges (recoveries)" in the Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended June 30, 2019 were $1 million.
The acquisition had no significant impact on revenues or net earnings for the year ended June 30, 2019 since the date of acquisition.
Pro forma results of operations for this acquisition have not been presented because they are not material to the consolidated results of operations.
The finalization of the purchase price allocation is pending the finalization of the valuation of fair value for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including tax balances. We expect to finalize this determination on or before our quarter ending December 31, 2019.
Liaison Technologies, Inc.
On December 17, 2018, we acquired all of the equity interest in Liaison, a leading provider of cloud-based business to business integration, for approximately $310.6 million in an all cash transaction. In accordance with Topic 805, this acquisition was accounted for as a business combination. We believe this acquisition complements and extends our EIM portfolio.
The results of operations of this acquisition have been consolidated with those of OpenText beginning December 17, 2018.
Preliminary Purchase Price Allocation
The recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based upon their preliminary fair values as of December 17, 2018, are set forth below:
Current assets$23,006
Non-current tangible assets5,168
Intangible customer assets68,300
Intangible technology assets107,000
Liabilities assumed(56,423)
Total identifiable net assets147,051
Goodwill163,592
Net assets acquired$310,643

The goodwill of approximately $163.6 million is primarily attributable to the synergies expected to arise after the acquisition. Of this goodwill, approximately $2.2 million is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
Included in total identifiable net assets is acquired deferred revenue with a fair value of $7.6 million, which represents our estimate of the fair value of the contractual obligations assumed based on a preliminary valuation. In arriving at this fair value, we reduced the acquired company’s original carrying value by an insignificant amount.

The fair value of current assets acquired includes accounts receivable with a fair value of $20.5 million. The gross amount receivable was $22.2 million, of which $1.7 million is expected to be uncollectible.
Acquisition-related costs for Liaison included in "Special charges (recoveries)" in the Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended June 30, 2019 were $3.7 million.
The acquisition had no significant impact on revenues or net earnings for the year ended June 30, 2019 since the date of acquisition.
Pro forma results of operations for this acquisition have not been presented because they are not material to the consolidated results of operations.
The finalization of the purchase price allocation is pending the finalization of the valuation of fair value for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including tax balances. We expect to finalize this determination on or before our quarter ending December 31, 2019.
Fiscal 2018 Acquisitions
Acquisition of Hightail, Inc. (Hightail)
On February 14, 2018, we acquired all of the equity interest in Hightail, a leading cloud service provider for file sharing and creative collaboration, for approximately $20.5 million in an all cash transaction. In accordance with Topic 805, this acquisition was accounted for as a business combination. We believe this acquisition complements and extends our EIM portfolio.
The results of operations of this acquisition have been consolidated with those of OpenText beginning February 14, 2018.
Purchase Price Allocation
The recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based upon their fair values as of February 14, 2018, are set forth below:
Current assets$1,290
Non-current tangible assets1,270
Intangible customer assets12,900
Intangible technology assets4,200
Liabilities assumed(6,418)
Total identifiable net assets13,242
Goodwill7,293
Net assets acquired$20,535

The goodwill of approximately $7.3 million is primarily attributable to the synergies expected to arise after the acquisition. No portion of this goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
Included in total identifiable net assets is acquired deferred revenue with a fair value of $5.2 million, which represents our estimate of the fair value of the contractual obligations assumed. In arriving at this fair value, we reduced the acquired company’s original carrying value by $2.0 million.
The fair value of current assets acquired includes accounts receivable with a fair value of $0.7 million. The gross amount receivable was $0.8 million of which $0.1 million of this receivable is expected to be uncollectible.
The finalization of the purchase price allocation during the year ended June 30, 2019 did not result in any significant changes to the preliminary amounts previously disclosed.
Acquisition of Guidance Software, Inc. (Guidance)
On September 14, 2017, we acquired all of the equity interest in Guidance, a leading provider of forensic security solutions, for approximately $240.5 million. In accordance with Topic 805, this acquisition was accounted for as a business combination. We believe this acquisition complements and extends our EIM portfolio.
The results of operations of this acquisition have been consolidated with those of OpenText beginning September 14, 2017.
The following tables summarize the consideration paid for Guidance and the amount of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as well as the goodwill recorded as of the acquisition date:

Cash consideration*$237,291
Guidance shares already owned by OpenText through open market purchases (at fair value)3,247
Purchase consideration$240,538
* Inclusive of $2.3 million previously accrued, but since paid as of September 30, 2018. See "Appraisal Proceedings" below for more information.

Purchase Price Allocation
The recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based upon their fair values as of September 14, 2017, are set forth below:
Current assets (inclusive of cash acquired of $5.7 million)$24,744
Non-current tangible assets11,583
Intangible customer assets71,230
Intangible technology assets51,851
Liabilities assumed(48,670)
Total identifiable net assets110,738
Goodwill129,800
Net assets acquired$240,538

The goodwill of approximately $129.8 million is primarily attributable to the synergies expected to arise after the acquisition. Of this goodwill, approximately $1.9 million is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
Included in total identifiable net assets is acquired deferred revenue with a fair value of $26.6 million, which represents our estimate of the fair value of the contractual obligations assumed. In arriving at this fair value, we reduced the acquired company’s original carrying value by $7.6 million.
The fair value of current assets acquired includes accounts receivable with a fair value of $10.3 million. The gross amount receivable was $11.8 million of which $1.5 million of this receivable is expected to be uncollectible.
An amount of $0.8 million, representing the mark to market gain on the shares we held in Guidance prior to the acquisition, was recorded to "Other income" in our Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended June 30, 2018.
The finalization of the purchase price allocation during the year ended June 30, 2019 did not result in any significant changes to the preliminary amounts previously disclosed.

Appraisal Proceedings
Under Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, shareholders who did not tender their shares in connection with our tender offer were entitled to have their shares appraised by the Delaware Court of Chancery and receive payment of the “fair value” of such shares. On August 31, 2017 we received notice from the record holder of approximately 1,519,569 shares or 5% of the issued and outstanding Guidance shares as of the date of acquisition, demanding an appraisal of the fair value of Guidance shares as they believed the price we paid for Guidance shares was less than its fair value. We accrued $10.8 million in connection with these claims, which is equivalent to paying $7.10 per Guidance share, the amount these Guidance shareholders otherwise would have received had they tendered their shares in our offer. During the second quarter of Fiscal 2018, we paid $8.5 million to the trust account of dissenting shareholders’ attorney, leaving $2.3 million previously accrued. During the three months ended September 30, 2018, these amounts were settled and released. On August 27, 2018, the appraisal petition was dismissed with prejudice.
Acquisition of Covisint Corporation (Covisint)
On July 26, 2017, we acquired all of the equity interest in Covisint, a leading cloud platform for building Identity, Automotive, and Internet of Things applications, for approximately $102.8 million in an all cash transaction. In accordance with Topic 805, this acquisition was accounted for as a business combination. We believe this acquisition complements and extends our EIM portfolio.
The results of operations of this acquisition have been consolidated with those of OpenText beginning July 26, 2017.

Purchase Price Allocation 
The recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based upon their fair values as of July 26, 2017, are set forth below:
Current assets (inclusive of cash acquired of $31.5 million)$41,586
Non-current tangible assets3,426
Intangible customer assets36,600
Intangible technology assets17,300
Liabilities assumed(23,033)
Total identifiable net assets75,879
Goodwill26,905
Net assets acquired$102,784

The goodwill of approximately $26.9 million is primarily attributable to the synergies expected to arise after the acquisition. Of this goodwill, approximately $26.8 million is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
Included in total identifiable net assets is acquired deferred revenue with a fair value of $12.2 million, which represents our estimate of the fair value of the contractual obligations assumed. In arriving at this fair value, we reduced the acquired company’s original carrying value by $4.6 million.
The fair value of current assets acquired includes accounts receivable with a fair value of $7.8 million. The gross amount receivable was $7.9 million of which $0.1 million of this receivable was expected to be uncollectible.
The finalization of the purchase price allocation is pendingwas completed during Fiscal 2018 and did not result in any significant changes to the finalization of the fair value for taxation-related balances and for potential adjustments to assets and liabilities. We expect to finalize this determination on or before March 31, 2017.preliminary amounts previously disclosed.
Acquisition-related costs for ANX included in Special charges (recoveries) in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended June 30, 2016 were $0.9 million.
The acquisition had no significant impact on revenues and net earnings for the year ended June 30, 2016, since the date of acquisition.Fiscal 2017 Acquisitions
Purchase of an Asset Group Constituting a Business - ECD Business
On January 23, 2017, we acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of the enterprise content division of EMC Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation, and certain of its subsidiaries, collectively referred to as Dell-EMC (ECD Business) for approximately $1.62 billion. In accordance with Topic 805, this acquisition was accounted for as a business combination. ECD Business offers OpenText a suite of leading Enterprise Content Management solutions with deep industry focus, including the DocumentumTM, InfoArchiveTM, and LEAPTM product families. We believe this acquisition complements and extends our EIM portfolio.
The results of operations of this acquisition were consolidated with those of OpenText beginning January 23, 2017.
Purchase Price Allocation 
The recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based upon their fair values as of January 23, 2017, are set forth below:
Current assets$11,339
Non-current tangible assets103,672
Intangible customer assets407,000
Intangible technology assets459,000
Liabilities assumed(182,301)
Total identifiable net assets798,710
Goodwill823,684
Net assets acquired$1,622,394

The goodwill of $823.7 million is primarily attributable to the synergies expected to arise after the acquisition. Of this goodwill, approximately $378.5 million is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
Included in total identifiable net assets is acquired deferred revenue with a fair value of $163.8 million, which represents our estimate of the fair value of the contractual obligations assumed. In arriving at this fair value, we reduced the acquired company’s original carrying value by $52.0 million.

Further, included within total identifiable net assets are also certain contract assets which represent revenue earned by the ECD Business on long-term projects for which billings had not yet occurred as of January 23, 2017. As these long-term projects have now been inherited by OpenText, we are responsible for billing and collecting cash on these projects at the appropriate time, yet we do not and will not recognize revenue for these billings. The fair value assigned to these contract assets as of January 23, 2017 was $8.4 million.
Purchase of an Asset Group Constituting a Business - CCM Business
On April 30,July 31, 2016, we acquired certain customer experiencecommunications management software and services assets and liabilities from HP Inc. (CEM(CCM Business) for approximately $160.0 million, of which $7.3 million is currently held back and unpaid in accordance with the terms of the purchase agreement.$315.0 million. In accordance with Topic 805, this acquisition was accounted for as a business combination. We believe this acquisition will complementcomplements our current software portfolio, particularlyand allows us to better serve our Customer Experience Management and Cloud offerings.customers by offering a wider set of CCM capabilities.
The results of operations of this acquisition have beenwere consolidated with those of OpenText beginning April 30,July 31, 2016.
Preliminary Purchase Price Allocation 
The recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based upon their preliminary fair values as of April 30,July 31, 2016, are set forth below:
Current assets$683
Non-current deferred tax asset11,861
Non-current tangible assets2,348
Intangible customer assets64,000
Intangible technology assets101,000
Liabilities assumed(38,090)
Total identifiable net assets141,802
Goodwill173,198
Net assets acquired$315,000
Current assets$2,333
Non-current tangible assets12,041
Intangible customer assets33,000
Intangible technology assets47,000
Liabilities assumed(25,086)
Total identifiable net assets69,288
Goodwill90,712
Net assets acquired$160,000

The goodwill of $90.7$173.2 million is primarily attributable to the synergies expected to arise after the acquisition. Of this goodwill, approximately $77.0$105.1 million is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
The finalization of the purchase price allocation is pending the finalization of the fair value for assets acquired, including intangible assets and liabilities assumed.
Acquisition-related costs for CEM Business included in Special charges (recoveries) in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended June 30, 2016 were $2.8 million.
The acquisition had no significant impact on revenues and net earnings for the year ended June 30, 2016 since the date of acquisition.

Acquisition of DaegisRecommind, Inc.
On November 23, 2015,On July 20, 2016, we acquired all of the equity interest in DaegisRecommind, Inc. (Daegis)(Recommind), a globalleading provider of eDiscovery and information governance, data migration solutions and development company, based in Texas, United States. Total considerationanalytics, for Daegis was $23.3 million ($22.1 million - net of cash acquired).approximately $170.1 million. In accordance with Topic 805, this acquisition was accounted for as a business combination. We believe this acquisition enables OpenText to strengthencomplements our current information governance capabilities.
We recognized $8.0 million of goodwill associated with this acquisition, which is primarily attributable to the synergies that are expected to arise after the acquisition. This goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
Acquisition-related costs for Daegis included in Special charges (recoveries) in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended June 30, 2016 was $1.1 million.EIM solutions, and through eDiscovery and analytics, provides increased visibility into structured and unstructured data.
The results of operations of Daegis have been consolidated with those of OpenText beginning November 23, 2015.
The acquisition had no significant impact on revenues and net earnings for the year ended June 30, 2016 since the date of acquisition.
Pro forma results of operations for these acquisitions have not been presented because they are not material to the consolidated results of operations either individually or in aggregate.
Fiscal 2015 Acquisitions
Acquisition of Actuate Corporation
On January 16, 2015, we acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Actuate, based in San Francisco, California, United States. Actuate was a leader in personalized analytics and insights and we believe the acquisition complements our OpenText EIM Suite. In accordance with Topic 805, this acquisition was accounted for as a business combination.
The results of operations of ActuateRecommind, were consolidated with those of OpenText beginning January 16, 2015.
The following tables summarize the consideration paid for Actuate and the amount of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as well as the goodwill recorded as of the acquisition date:
Cash consideration$322,417
Fair value, at date of acquisition, on shares of Actuate already owned through open market purchases9,539
Purchase consideration$331,956
July 20, 2016.
Purchase Price Allocation 
The recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based upon their fair values as of January 16, 2015,July 20, 2016, are set forth below:
Current assets$30,034
Non-current tangible assets1,245
Intangible customer assets51,900
Intangible technology assets24,800
Long-term deferred tax liabilities(1,780)
Other liabilities assumed(27,497)
Total identifiable net assets78,702
Goodwill91,405
Net assets acquired$170,107

Current assets (inclusive of cash acquired of $22,463)$78,150
Non-current tangible assets13,540
Intangible customer assets62,600
Intangible technology assets60,000
Liabilities assumed(79,686)
Total identifiable net assets134,604
Goodwill197,352
Net assets acquired$331,956
The goodwill of $91.4 million is primarily attributable to the synergies expected to arise after the acquisition. No portion of thethis goodwill recorded upon the acquisition of Actuate is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

The fair value of current assets acquired includes accounts receivable with a fair value of $23.4$28.7 million. The gross amount receivable was $23.6$29.6 million of which $0.2$0.9 million of this receivable was expected to be uncollectible.
We recognized a gain of $3.1 million as a result of remeasuring to fair value our investment in Actuate held before the date of acquisition. The gain was included in "Other income" in our Consolidated Financial Statements during the year ended June 30, 2015.

Acquisition of Informative Graphics Corporation
On January 2, 2015, we acquired all of the equity interest in Informative Graphics Corporation (IGC), based in Scottsdale, Arizona, United States. IGC was a leading developer of viewing, annotation, redaction and publishing commercial software. Total consideration for IGC was $40.0 million ($38.7 million - net of cash acquired). In accordance with Topic 805, this acquisition was accounted for as a business combination. We believe this acquisition enables OpenText to engineer solutions that further increase a user's experience within our OpenText EIM Suite.
The results of operations of IGC were consolidated with those of OpenText beginning January 2, 2015.
No portion of the goodwill recorded upon the acquisition of IGC is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
Fiscal 2014 Acquisitions
GXS Group, Inc.
On January 16, 2014, we acquired all of the equity interest in GXS, a Delaware corporation and leader in cloud-based, business-to-business (B2B) integration. The acquisition combined OpenText's Information Exchange portfolio with GXS' portfolio of B2B integration services and managed services. Total consideration for GXS was $1.2 billion, inclusive of the issuance of 2,595,042 OpenText Common Shares. In accordance with Topic 805, this acquisition was accounted for as a business combination.
The results of operations of GXS have been consolidated with those of OpenText beginning January 16, 2014.
The following tables summarize the consideration paid for GXS and the amount of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as well as the goodwill recorded as of the acquisition date:
Cash consideration paid$1,101,874
Equity consideration paid116,777
Purchase consideration$1,218,651
Purchase Price Allocation
The purchase price of GXS has been allocated to GXS' tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based on their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. For certain assets and liabilities, the book values as of the balance sheet date have been determined to reflect fair values. The excess of the purchase price over the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets has been recorded as goodwill.
Our purchase price allocation for GXS is as follows:
Current assets (inclusive of cash acquired of $24,382)$127,406
Non-current tangible assets36,139
Intangible customer assets364,600
Intangible technology assets123,200
Liabilities and non-controlling interest assumed(105,459)
Total identifiable net assets545,886
Goodwill672,765
Net assets acquired$1,218,651
No portion of the goodwill recorded upon the acquisition of GXS is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
The fair value of current assets acquired includes accounts receivable with a fair value of $94.3 million. The gross amount receivable was $108.2 million of which $13.9 million of this receivable was expected to be uncollectible.
Cordys Holding B.V.
On August 15, 2013, we acquired all of the equity interest in Cordys Holding B.V. (Cordys), a leading provider of Business Process Management (BPM) and case management solutions, offered on one platform with cloud, mobile, and social capabilities, based in Putten, the Netherlands. Total consideration for Cordys was $33.2 million paid in cash ($30.6 million - net of cash acquired). In accordance with Topic 805, this acquisition was accounted for as a business combination.
The results of operations of Cordys have been consolidated with those of OpenText beginning August 15, 2013.

NOTE 19—SEGMENT INFORMATION
ASC Topic 280, “Segment Reporting” (Topic 280), establishes standards for reporting, by public business enterprises, information about operating segments, products and services, geographic areas, and major customers. The method of determining what information, under Topic 280, to report is based on the way that an entity organizes operating segments for making operational decisions and how the entity’s management and chief operating decision maker (CODM) assess an entity’s financial performance. Our operations are analyzed by management and our CODM as being part of a single industry segment: the design, development, marketing and sales of Enterprise Information Management software and solutions.
The following table sets forth the distribution of revenues, by significant geographic area, for the periods indicated:
 Year Ended June 30,
 2019 2018 2017
Revenues:     
Canada$153,890
 $149,812
 $227,115
United States1,490,863
 1,425,244
 1,090,049
United Kingdom182,815
 201,821
 159,817
Germany203,403
 198,253
 166,611
Rest of Europe534,204
 517,693
 394,132
All other countries303,580
 322,418
 253,333
Total revenues$2,868,755
 $2,815,241
 $2,291,057

 Year Ended June 30,
 2016 2015 2014
Revenues:     
Canada$107,217
 $113,780
 $117,225
United States915,615
 887,895
 725,852
United Kingdom185,631
 201,059
 169,511
Germany155,201
 169,538
 162,966
Rest of Europe270,114
 267,702
 255,419
All other countries190,450
 211,943
 193,726
Total revenues$1,824,228
 $1,851,917
 $1,624,699
The following table sets forth the distribution of long-lived assets, representing property and equipment and intangible assets, by significant geographic area, as of the periods indicated below.
 As of June 30, 2019 As of June 30, 2018
Long-lived assets:   
Canada$799,928
 $1,027,858
United States502,844
 441,940
United Kingdom10,068
 13,253
Germany6,310
 8,282
Rest of Europe31,455
 17,104
All other countries45,352
 52,405
Total$1,395,957
 $1,560,842
 As of June 30,
2016
 As of June 30,
2015
Long-lived assets:   
Canada$145,927
 $64,622
United States546,788
 653,576
United Kingdom20,042
 10,988
Germany4,878
 5,320
Rest of Europe76,560
 73,905
All other countries35,705
 31,487
Total$829,900
 $839,898

NOTE 20—SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES
 Year Ended June 30,
 2019 2018 2017
Cash paid during the period for interest$138,631
 $132,799
 $115,117
Cash received during the period for interest$8,014
 $1,672
 $3,115
Cash paid during the period for income taxes$80,583
 $73,437
 $83,086

 Year Ended June 30,
 2016 2015 2014
Cash paid during the period for interest$72,058
(1) 
$34,658
 $26,697
Cash received during the period for interest$3,659
 $3,905
 $2,463
Cash paid during the period for income taxes$40,431
 $25,870
 $39,834
(1) We issued Senior Notes 2023 on January 15, 2015. Interest owing on Senior Notes 2023 is payable semi-annually, with the first payment of $22.5 million made on July 15, 2015 (see note 10).


NOTE 21—EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net income, attributable to OpenText, by the weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share are computed by dividing net income, attributable to OpenText, by the shares used in the calculation of basic earnings per share plus the dilutive effect of Common Share equivalents, such as stock options, using the treasury stock method. Common Share equivalents are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share if their effect is anti-dilutive.
 Year Ended June 30,
 2019 2018 2017
Basic earnings per share      
Net income attributable to OpenText$285,501
 $242,224
 $1,025,659
(1) 
Basic earnings per share attributable to OpenText$1.06
 $0.91
 $4.04
 
Diluted earnings per share      
Net income attributable to OpenText$285,501
 $242,224
 $1,025,659
(1) 
Diluted earnings per share attributable to OpenText$1.06
 $0.91
 $4.01
 
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding (in 000's)      
Basic268,784
 266,085
 253,879
 
Effect of dilutive securities1,124
 1,407
 1,926
 
Diluted269,908
 267,492
 255,805
 
Excluded as anti-dilutive(2)
2,759
 2,770
 1,371
 

 Year Ended June 30,
 2016 2015 2014
Basic earnings per share     
Net income attributable to OpenText$284,477
 $234,327
 $218,125
Basic earnings per share attributable to OpenText$2.34
 $1.92
 $1.82
Diluted earnings per share     
Net income attributable to OpenText$284,477
 $234,327
 $218,125
Diluted earnings per share attributable to OpenText$2.33
 $1.91
 $1.81
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding     
Basic121,463
 122,092
 119,674
Effect of dilutive securities575
 865
 902
Diluted122,038
 122,957
 120,576
Excluded as anti-dilutive*2,729
 1,859
 880
(1) Please also see note 14 "Income Taxes" for details relating to a one-time tax benefit of $876.1 million recorded during the three months ended September 30, 2016 in connection with an internal reorganization of our subsidiaries.
*(2) Represents options to purchase Common Shares excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise price of the stock options was greater than or equal to the average price of the Common Shares during the period.
NOTE 22—RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Our procedure regarding the approval of any related party transaction requires that the material facts of such transaction be reviewed by the independent members of the Audit Committee and the transaction be approved by a majority of the independent members of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee reviews all transactions in which we are, or will be, a participant and any related party has or will have a direct or indirect interest.interest in the transaction. In determining whether to approve a related party transaction, the Audit Committee generally takes into account, among other facts it deems appropriate, whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances; the extent and nature of the related person’s interest in the transaction; the benefits to the Company of the proposed transaction; if applicable, the effects on a director’s independence; and if applicable, the availability of other sources of comparable services or products.
During the year ended June 30, 2016,2019, Mr. Stephen Sadler, a director, earned approximately $0.6 million (year ended June 30, 2018 and 2017—$0.8 million, (June 30, 2015—$0.5 million, June 30, 2014—$0.7 million) respectively) in consulting fees from OpenText for assistance with acquisition-related business activities. Mr. Sadler abstained from voting on all transactions from which he would potentially derive consulting fees.
NOTE 23—SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Internal Reorganization
In July 2016, we implemented a reorganization of our subsidiaries worldwide with the view to continuing to enhance operational and administrative efficiencies through further consolidated ownership, management, and development of our intellectual property (IP) in Canada, continuing to reduce the number of entities in our group and working towards our objective of having a single operating legal entity in each jurisdiction. We believe our reorganization also reduces our exposure to global political and tax uncertainties, particularly in Europe. We believe that further consolidating our IP in Canada will continue to ensure appropriate legal protections for our consolidated IP, simplify legal, accounting and tax compliance, and improve our global cash management.
A material tax benefit, currently expected to be several hundred million dollars, associated with the recognition of a net deferred tax asset is expected to be realized upon the completion of the IP reorganization in the first quarter of Fiscal 2017. This is anticipated to have a material impact of reducing our tax provision in Fiscal 2017 as well as our consolidated income tax rate in Fiscal 2017.

EVENT
Cash Dividends
As part of our quarterly, non-cumulative cash dividend program, we declared, on July 26, 2016,31, 2019, a dividend of $0.23$0.1746 per Common Share. The record date for this dividend is August 26, 201630, 2019 and the payment date is September 16, 2016.20, 2019. Future declarations of dividends and the establishment of future record and payment dates are subject to the final determination and discretion of our Board of Directors.Board.


Acquisition of Recommind Inc.
On July 20, 2016, we closed our previously announced acquisition of Recommind Inc. (Recommind), a leading provider of eDiscovery and information analytics, by acquiring all of its equity interests for approximately $170 million. Recommind's SaaS and managed services solutions deliver insight from unstructured data to help people make better, faster business decisions. The financial results of Recommind will be consolidated from the closing date in our financial statements for the first quarter of Fiscal 2017.

Item 16.    Form 10-K Summary
Share Repurchase PlanNone.
On July 26, 2016, our Board of Directors authorized a new share repurchase plan for the repurchase of up to $200 million of our Common Shares, pursuant to a normal course issuer bid.






SIGNATURES




Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
Date: July 27, 2016August 1, 2019
By:/s/ MARK J. BARRENECHEA
 
Mark J. Barrenechea
Vice Chair, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Technology Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
 /s/ JOHN M. DOOLITTLEMADHU RANGANATHAN
 
John M. DoolittleMadhu Ranganathan
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
 /s/ ADITYA MAHESHWARI
 Aditya Maheshwari

Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer

(Principal Accounting Officer)




DIRECTORS
Signature Title Date
     
/s/ MARK J. BARRENECHEA 
Director,Vice Chair, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Technology Officer
 (Principal Executive Officer)
 July 27, 2016August 1, 2019
Mark J. Barrenechea
    
/S/ P. THOMAS JENKINS Chairman of the Board July 27, 2016August 1, 2019
P. Thomas Jenkins    
/S/ RANDY FOWLIE Director July 27, 2016August 1, 2019
Randy Fowlie
/S/ DAVID FRASERDirectorAugust 1, 2019
David Fraser    
/S/ GAIL E. HAMILTON Director July 27, 2016August 1, 2019
Gail E. Hamilton
/S/ BRIAN J. JACKMANDirectorJuly 27, 2016
Brian J. Jackman
/S/ DEBORAH WEINSTEINDirectorJuly 27, 2016
Deborah Weinstein    
/S/ STEPHEN J. SADLER Director July 27, 2016August 1, 2019
Stephen J. Sadler
/S/ HARMIT SINGHDirectorAugust 1, 2019
Harmit Singh    
/S/ MICHAEL SLAUNWHITE Director July 27, 2016August 1, 2019
Michael Slaunwhite    
/S/ KATHARINE B. STEVENSON Director July 27, 2016August 1, 2019
Katharine B. Stevenson    
/S/ CARL JÜRGEN TINGGRENDirectorAugust 1, 2019
Carl Jürgen Tinggren
/S/ DEBORAH WEINSTEINDirectorAugust 1, 2019
Deborah Weinstein




    153167